HomeMy WebLinkAbout2013-05-22 - Agenda Packet - HPC / PC THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
THE REGULAR MEETINGS OF
RANCHO
CUCAMONGA THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
AND
THE PLANNING COMMISSION
MAY 22, 2013 - 7:00 PM
Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center
Council Chambers
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, California
I. CALL TO ORDER
• Pledge of Allegiance
Roll Call
Chairman Howdyshell _ Vice Chairman Fletcher
Munoz_ Wimberly_ Oaxaca
II. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
This is the time and place for the general public to address the Historic Preservation Commission or the
Planning Commission on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Historic
Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission from addressing any issue not previously
included on the Agenda. The Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission may
receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting.
Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair,
depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed
directly to the Historic Preservation Commission or Planning Commission, not to the members of the
audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please
refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises,or engaging in any activity
which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting.
III. CONSENT CALENDARMISTORIC PRESERVATION
COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION
AHISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA
P�NCHO MAY 22r 2013
CUCAMONGA Page 2
A. Approval of minutes dated May 8, 2013
IV. DIRECTOR'S REPORTS/PLANNING COMMISSION
B. CONSIDERATION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013/2014.
V. COMMISSION CONCERNS/HISTORIC PRESERVATION
AND PLANNING COMMISSION
VI. ADJOURNMENT •
1, Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby
certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on May 16, 2013, at least 72 hours prior to
the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga.
If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting,
please contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750. Notification of 48
hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to
ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired.
INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC
TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION
The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak,given
the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you
may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the
views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others,the audience should refrain
from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience.
The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission,
please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and
speak into the microphone. After speaking, please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium.
It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are
generally limited to 5 minutes per individual.
r
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA
;PeNCHO MAY 22, 2013
CUCAMONGA Page 3
If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under"Public Comments." There is
opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda.
Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for
distribution to the Commissioners. A copy of any such materials should also be provided to the Secretary to be
used for the official public record.
All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. Requests for
scheduling agenda items will be at the discretion of the Commission and the Planning Director,
AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS
Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning
Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. These
documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7:00
a.m. to 6:00 p.m., except for legal City holidays.
APPEALS
• Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's
decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office
and must be accompanied by a fee of$2,486.06 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and
governed by the City Council).
Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session.
Copies of the Planning Commission agendas, staff reports and minutes can be found at
www.CitvofRC.us
•
Vicinity Map
Historic Preservation and
Planning Commission Meeting
May 22 , 2013
- - - -------------------, �- ----------------, ---------------------_ ............
- -
i ; .._.._.._
I
i ° c 10 ----- - -• — i
i m m E M Fo c i !
I t m u € > I
! a U ¢ x x m !
U I
m
19th St
S
:1
Base Line '' /Base
Church
I Church
Foothill Foothill N
v
Arrow B " I Arrow
c m = c 1
J4 rse
o
6th W _ 1
d -a
U 6th a c 6th W
—
4th Q 4th
* Meeting Location:
City HalUCouncil Chambers
10500 Civic Center Drys
Item A: Approval of Regular Meeting Minutes dated May 8, 2013
Item B: Capital Improvement Program (Citywide)
• THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
PP6AMCHOTHE MINUTES OF
CUCAMONGA THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
AND
THE PLANNING COMMISSION
MAY 8, 2013 - 7:00 PM
Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center
Council Chambers
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, California
I. CALL TO ORDER
Pledge of Allegiance 7:03 PM
• Roll Call
Chairman Howdyshell A Vice Chairman Fletcher X
Munoz X Wimberly X Oaxaca X
Additional Staff Present Jeff Bloom, Deputy City Manager/Economic and Community Development:
Steven Flower, Assistant City Attorney: Dan James. Senior Civil Engineer: Lois Schrader, Planning
Commission Secretary:Jennifer Nakamura, Associate Planner,Mike Smith Associate Planner:Donald
Granger, Senior Planner
11 II. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
This is the time and place for the general public to address the Historic Preservation Commission or the
Planning Commission on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Historic
Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission from addressing any issue not previously
included on the Agenda. The Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission may
receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting.
Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair,
depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed
directly to the Historic Preservation Commission or Planning,Commission, not to the members of the
audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please
refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any activity
which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting.
•
Item A—1
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION •
AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA
C� a, MAY 812013
Page 2
Gino Felippi commented on the community garden and vineyard located south of Foothill Boulevard and
west of Sears Grand. He said there is a master plan for the garden and they are attempting to transplant
historic vines on the property. He said the property does have a well with water and they are working
through the process to access the water.
Mario Di Carlo said his ancestors have been residents of Rancho Cucamonga since the 1800s. He said
he is a home winemaker and would love to preserve old vines, only of which about 500 acres remain
here. He said much of that acreage where the old vines exist will be graded for future development. He
pointed out that our logo has grapes but our City may not have any grapes in the future. He said they
are seeking help from the City to get a portion of land to transplant and restore with old vines and new
propagation.
Dee Matrayek said the community garden has a vineyard to help preserve the grape growing heritage of
the region. She said the vines could provide a cash crop to sustain the garden overall. She said they
still need more water. She said they are discovering vines are being plowed up because of new
developments going in. She asked that the old vines be given a historic designation and she would like
help rescuing them so they can be transplanted and even preserve entire plots.
Vice Chairman Fletcher asked what the success rate is in transplanting old vines, if they produce the
same, and how many there are.
Mr. De Carto said they successfully transplanted 60 vines, need lots of water and 70-75%survived and •
produced. He noted there are about 250 vines and the characteristic of the grapes may change some
from those that were dry farmed.
Ms. Matrayek said there are about 400 old vines and 250 new but perhaps 1,000 total possible vines.
She said they would like advance warning to coordinate their vine removal with developers so they can
be removed at the right time of year for better success. She said it costs about 520-25 per plant to
remove.
Mr Filippi noted that Mr. Di Carto lives in the old stone Agazatti home which has about 60 vines. He
noted the garden site is 15 acres.
IF-111, ANNOUNCEMENTS AND PRESENTATIONS
A. GOVERNMENT REFERRAL DRC2013-00319 - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS
COMPANY-An informational presentation to the Planning Commission of an upgrade
to the Southern California Gas Company's system by adding advanced meter
communications devices to residential and business natural gas meters which will
require the installation of data collectors mounted on poles 24 feet in height at various
locations throughout the Company's service area that includes the City of Rancho
Cucamonga.
Kristine Scott, Public Affairs Manager made the presentation.
The Secretary received and filed the presentation materials (PowerPoint on file).
In response to Commissioner Wimberly. she said the customer benefit of the new system will be •
similar to Edison in that the customer can track their gas usage at any time to allow for
Item A—2
AHISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA
P�NCHO MAY 89 2013
CtXAMOr'a" Page 3
conservation and it will eliminate the need for meter readers which will save gas emissions from
their vehicles. She said the readers are being trained to install the new systems. In response to
Commissioner Munoz she said their outreach on the program will include briefings with local
officials and mailings to their customers beginning in 2014. She said the locations of the units
will be in the public right of way and some areas may be found to not be appropriate, they are
working with City staff. In response to Commissioner Oaxaca she said this equipment does not
generally fall under any City ordinances with requirements for review as they are just upgrading
their infrastructure. In response to Vice Chairman Fletcher. Robert Shaw of Southern California
Gas stated the transmission range is about 1.5 miles and overlap is built in between DCU's.
IV. CONSENT CALENDAR/HISTORIC PRESERVATION
COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION
B. Approval of minutes dated April 24, 2013
Moved by Munoz, seconded by Wimberly, the Consent Calendar was adopted 4-0-1
• (Howdyshell absent)
V. PUBLIC HEARINGS/PLANNING COMMISSION
The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law.
The Chairman will open the public hearing to receive testimony. All such opinions shall be
limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. Please sign in after speaking.
C. DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2013-00101 AND ADDENDUM TO THE
GENERAL PLAN FINAL PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT(FPEIR)
(SCH#2000061027)-CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA-A supplemental update to
the Development Code Update (DRC2010-00571) to amend Article II (Land Use and
Development Procedures),Article III (Zoning Districts,Allowed Uses and Development
Standards), Article IV (Site Development Provisions), Article V (Specific Use
Requirements), Article VII (Design Standards and Guidelines) and Article VII
(Glossary) of Title 17 (Development Code) as well as a proposed addendum to the
General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report(FPEIR).This action will be
forwarded to the City Council for final action.
Jennifer Nakamura, Associate Planner, presented the staff report and gave a PowerPoint
presentation(copy on file). In response to Commissioner Munoz. she reported that the medical
services category changes mostly affect Doctor and Dentist offices. In response to Vice
Chairman Fletcher, she said no specific criteria has been landed on yet for outdoor sales activity
with respect to cottage food businesses but in general the Code dictates all activity be done
indoors: the intent was for customers to pick up their ordered items. She said the Code has
. always allowed for home grown produce.
Item A —3
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA
RANCHO MAY 812013
UCAMONGA Page 4
Steven Flower, Assistant City Attorney said there is no language in the bill that addresses this
and all the cities are working to make sense of what was written.
Vice Chairman Fletcher opened the public hearing.
Seeing and hearing none, Vice Chairman Fletcher closed the public hearing.
Ms Nakamura reported that another round of bigger changes is expected later in the year. a
prioritized list is being maintained.
The Commission complimented Ms. Nakamura on the report and presentation.
Motion by Munoz seconded by Oaxaca adopted 4-0-1 (Howdyshell absent)
VI. COMMISSION CONCERNWHISTORIC PRESERVATION
AND PLANNING COMMISSION
Commissioner Munoz offered kudos to our Library as they won a National Award. He said our
Library is world class and the award is well-deserved. All the Commissioners agreed. •
Donald Granger. Senior Planner announced the Local History Night (National Historic
Preservation Month) celebration being held at the Biane Library 7-9 pm on Friday, May 10.
Commissioner Oaxaca reflected on the viticulture of the city and said it would be a shame to
have no grapes to reflect our logo and grape producing history. He said we have taken steps to
rescue structures but now he is asking staff to research and report on what exists in the form of
an ordinance that would address the old grapevines in the City. He said we should take a more
active role as our agriculture has either disappeared or is slated to disappear He supports
organized. orderly preservation and asked staff to begin a process or prepare a draft for an
ordinance to propose to the City Council for this type of preservation. He noted that Manning
Homes is working with Tom Grahn, Associate Planner towards rescuing the vines from their
property for transplantation.
Vice Chairman Fletcher said that now that we have interest in transplanting and a property for
transplantation and he thought the Commission could probably agree on this.
Commissioner Munoz said he has read and heard about contention regarding the Commission
decision with respect to the China House. He asked staff for an update.
Jeff Bloom, Deputy City Manager said in addition to the Planning Department's standard letter
following the Commission's decision, the Building Official sent an amended order to CVWD
requiring stabilization of the building and it also proposes the.environmental work be done. He
said CVWD filed an appeal of the Commission's action and we are in the process of setting the
date for the hearing.
VII. ADJOURNMENT •
Item A—4
1
• HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA
C� a MAY 8, 2013
Page 5
8:00 PM
•
•
Item A -5
STAFF REPORT
ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
• Date: May 22, 2013
RANCHO
To: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission C,UCAMONGA
From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer
By: Jerry A. Dyer, Senior Civil Engineer
Subject: CONSIDERATION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013/14
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that by minute action the Planning Commission find the Capital Improvement Program
for Fiscal Year 2013/14 in conformity with the adopted General Plan.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
The Capital Improvement Program (CIP) as attached as Exhibit "B" is required per Government Code
65401, Exhibit "A", to be adopted by the City Council. The Planning Commission is required to find the
CIP in conformity with the adopted General Plan.
The CIP is a vital piece of the City's Annual Operating Budget as it dictates major capital expenditures
obligated in any given year. The CIP consists of a multi-year plan for citywide infrastructure
• improvements. Each year, the City budgets for"funded" projects which will occur during said fiscal year.
The list of projects contained in the CIP addresses both the City's long and short-term capital needs. It
identifies projects that reflect the desires of the community, as well as projects that serve operational and
maintenance needs.
The City's Engineering staff works with all Departments within the City to develop and implement an
economically feasible CIP that embodies the City's public infrastructure needs. The CIP is the product of
joint planning, taken from the City's General Plan, local residents, the business community, the local
development community, and external government agencies.
The projects have been categorized by type of project (Beautification, Drainage, Facilities, etc.), which
are in alphabetical order within each category. The individual project sheets include a short summary,
cost, year funded, and a map showing the project location.
Projects are funded from a variety of sources including Development Impact Fees, Measure "I", Gas Tax,
and miscellaneous grants. There are 61 projects totaling just over $53,000,000 to be executed in the
upcoming fiscal year. Apart from the 61 projects previously indentified, 25 projects just over$80,000,000
are identified as future and unfunded.
espectfu submitted,
Mark A. euer
Dtretfor of Engineering Services/City Engineer
• Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Government Code 65401
Exhibit "B" - Fiscal Year 2013/2014 Capital Improvement Program (distributed under
separate cover)
Item B-1
Government Code
65401. If a general plan or part thereof has been adopted, within such time as may be
fbred by the legislative body, each county or city officer, department, board, or
commission, and each governmental body, commission, or board, Including the
governing body of any special district or school district, whose jurisdiction lies wholly or
partially within the county or city, whose functions Include recommending, preparing
plans for, or oonstructIM, major public works, shall submit to the official agency, as
designated by the respective county board of supervisors or city council, a list of the
proposed public works recommended for planning, Initiation or construction during the
ansulrg fiscal year. The official agency receiving the list of proposed public works shall
list and classify all such recommendations and shall prepare a coordinated program of
proposed public works for the ensuing fiec al year. Such coordinated program shell be
submitted to the county or olty planning agency for review and report to said official
agency as to conformity with the adopted general plan or part thereof.
kXHIBIT A
Item B-2
TO BE DISTRIBUTED UNDER SEPARATE COVER.
EXHIBIT B
Item B-3
1
1 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
1 PLAN
1 FISCAL YEAR 2013/2014
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 RANCHO
CUCAMONGA
1
1
1
1 10500 CIVIC CENTER DUIVE
1 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 91730
(909) 477 - 2700
WWW.CI'I'1'OFRC.COM
1
1
r
i
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
' COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
I CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
FISCAL YEAR 2013/14
SUMMARY
Categories Budgeted Unfunded General Plan: Policy Reference
A. Beautification........................... (2) $ 1,000 $ 228,000 GP:CM-3.10,CM-3.11,PS-12.7
' B. Drainage.................................. (2) $ 1,000 $ 3,945,000 GP:CM4.4
C. Facilities...................................(11) $ 3,131,000 $ 16,240,000 GP:ED-3.1,PF-1.1,PF-1.4,PF-1.5
D. Miscellaneous.......................... (6) $ 2,630,570 $ 719,360 GP:CM-1.4,CM-2.1,CM-3.7,CS-6.3,
I LU-11.2,PS-12.4
E. Municipal Utility..................... (1) $ 469,040 $ - GP:PF-1.4,RC4.2
F. Parks........................................ (7) $ 669,600 $ 3,960,090 GP:CS-1.8
G. Railroad Crossings.................. (1) $ 25,000 $ 440,000 GP:CM-1.2,CM4.4
H. Streets..................................... (27) $ 46,221,330 $ 12,350,200 GP:CM-1.1,CM-2.1,CM4.4,ED4.3
I. Traffic....................................... (4) $ 325,000 $ GP:CM-4.1,CM4.2
TOTAL............................... (61) $ 53,473,540 $ 37,882,650
' J. Future&Unfunded Projects.... (25) $ 80,364,100 GP:CM-1.1,CM4.4,CS-1.8,ED-3.1,
PF-3.1,PS-12.4
r
t
z
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA- CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM- FISCAL YEAR 2013114
No. Project Fund Account Amount(5)
' A. Beautification
1 Archibald Ave from N/0 Norbrook to Carred St-Community Trail West Side Beautification 1110316565011830110-0 500
(Continuation of Design,with Construction FY14/15 if funds are available) Unknown xxxxxxxxiooJ1830xxx-0 103.000
103,500
' 2 Haven Ave from Wilson to Vivienda-Community Trail on the West Side Beautification 1110316565011829110-0 500
(Continuation of Design,with Construction FY14/15 if funds are available) Unknown xxxxxxxx xxJ1829xxx-0 125.000
125,500
' Beautification UnFunded Total. 228,000
Beautification Funded Total: 1,000
B. Drainage
' 1 Hermosa Ave from the Alta Loma Basin to Wilson-Storm Drain General Drainage 1112303565011810112-0 500
(Continuation of Design,with Construction FY15/16 if funds are available) Unknown xxxxxxxxxta/1810xxx-0 2,245,000
Related to Hermosa pavement rehabilitation 2,245,500
2 Lemon Avenue from Haven to 1300 feet west-Storm Drain General Drainage 11123035650/1791112-0 500
' (Continuation of Design,with Construction FY17/18 if funds are available) Unknown xxxxxxxxxxx/1810xxx-0 1,79,0,000
Related to Lemon pavement rehabilitation 1,700,500
Drainage UnFunded Total'. 3.945,000
' Drainage Funded Total: 1,000
C. Facilities
1 Central Park-Replace Floonng Capital Reserve 1025001-5602 130,000
' 2 Civic Center-Landscape Renovation Design Capital Reserve 1025001-5607 30,000
3 Civic Center-Parking and Exterior Lighting Capital Reserve 1025001-5607 170,500
4 Civic Center-Roof and Patio Replacement Capital Reserve 1025001-5602 1,050,000
5 Corporate Yard-Additional CNG Compressor,Fuel Management System, AB 2766 Air Quality Impr 1105208-5603 238,000
and Time Fill Posts Equip/Veh Replacement 1712001-5603 233,000
471,000
' 6 Corporate Yard and Sports Complex-Retrofit of Gasoline Above Storage Tanks AB 2766 Air Quality Impr 1105208-5607 39,500
7 Council Chamber-Audio-visual redesign Capital Reserve 1025001-5602 300,000
8 Cultural Arts Center-Paint Lobby Capital Reserve 1025001-5602 90,000
9 Fire District-Jersey Station 174 Training Facility Fire Capital Projects 3288501565011735288-0 500,000
(Design,with Construction FY14/15 if funds are available) Fire Capital Projects 32885015650/1735288-0 10.000.000
' 10,500.000
10 Paul A.Biane Library-2nd Floor Rancho KIDS Project Library Capital Fund 13296015650/1867329-0 250,000
(Construction funded FY14115 to FY16117-multi-phased) Library Capital Fund 13296015650/1867329-0 6,240,000
6,490,000
' 11 Public Safety Building-HVAC IAQ Law Enforcement Reserve 1017701-5602 100,000
Facilities UnFunded Total: 16,240,000
Facilities Funded Total: 3,131,000
D. Miscellaneous
1 ADA Ramps at Vanous Locations Measure 1 1176303565011150176-0 100,000
(Survey,Design and Construction) Measure 1 11773035650/1150177-0 200.000
' Note: combine 3 fiscal years for large scale project encompassing 300,000
123 kxabons
II
1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM- FISCAL YEAR 2013/14
No. Project Fund Account Amount(Sj
2 Arrow Route Utility Underground-Bear Gulch to West of Archibald Ave Underground Utilities 11293035650/1777129-0 1,000
' (Continuation of Design,with Construction funded FY14/15) Underground Utilities 11293035650/1777129-0 719,360
720,360
3 Base Line Rd at 1-15 Freeway-Ublity Underground Transportation 11243035650/1848124-0 252,200
(Design and Construction) Underground Utilities 11293035650/1848129-0 5,600
' Related to the Base Line at 1-15 Freeway Interchange Improvements Citywide Infrastructure 11983035650/1848198-0 242,200
500,000
4 Base Line Rd Utility Underground-Camelian St to Vineyard Ave Underground Utilities 11293035650/1776129-0 554,570
5 LED Street Light Enhancement Project SLD 8 11583035650/1866158-0 1,000,000
6 Pacific Electric Trail at Day Creek Channel Connection Citywide Infrastructure 11983035650/1827198-0 150,000
Ped Grant Anide 3 12143035650/1827214-0 12&000
' 275,000
Miscellaneous UnFunded Total: 719.360
Miscellaneous Funded Total: 2,830,570
E. Municipal Utility-Electrical
1 Church Street-Line Extension from Bass Pro Shop to Etiwanda Avenue Municipal Utility 1705303565011857705-0 469,040
(Service for Lerner Housing Tract)
Municipal Utility UnFunded Total: 0
Municipal Utility Funded Total: 469,040
F. Parks
1 Central Park-Hardscape 8 Landscape Improvements Park Development 11203055650/1803120-0 25,000
' 2 Coyote Canyon Park-Playground ADA and CPSC Improvements LMD 4R 11343035650/1859134-0 150,000
3 Etiwanda Creek Park-Sidewalk Improvements Park Development 11203055650/1861120-0 25,000
(Design,with Construction FY14/15 if funds are available) Unknown ranato oowlsel a -o 325,000
350.000
4 Legacy Park-Playground Seat Wall CFD 2002-03 Park Maint 1868203-5607 20,000
t 5 LMD 4R-Lighting Retrofits at Various Parks LMD 4R 1134303565011858134-0 150,000
(Milliken,Mountain View,Ralph Lewis and West Greenway Parks)
6 Rancho Summit Park-Restore Playground Rubber Surface CFD 2002-03 Park Maint 1868203-5607 16,100
7 South"st Cucamonga Park-Nev,Park Prop 84 State Grant 12353055650/1754235-0 283,500
(Confinuation M Design,construction FY 14/15) Prop 84 State Grant 12353055650/1754235-0 3,655,090
3,918,590
' Parks UnFunded Total: 3,960,090
Parks Funded Total: 669,500
G. Railroad Crossings
1 6th Street al BNSF Spur-Improve at Grade Crossing Transportation 11243035650/1839124-0 25,000
(Survey and Design,with Construction FY15/16 if funds are available) Transportation 11243035650/1839124-0 440,000
465,000
Railroad Crossings UnFunded Total'. 440,000
Railroad Crossings Funded Total: 25,000
III
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM - FISCAL YEAR 2013/14
No. Project Fund Account Amount(5)
H. Streeffi
' 1 4th Street from Archibald to Haven-North Side Pavement Rehabilitation Measure 1 11763035650/1853176-0 10,000
(Survey and Design,with Construction funded FY15/16) Measure 1 11773035650/1853177-0 10,000
Note. possible CalRecycle 3 Rebate Measure 1 11773035650/1853177-0 305.000
325,000
2 4th Street from Milliken to Richmond-North Side Pavement Rehabilitation Gas Tax R&T 7360 11743035650/1817174-0 2061000
(Design and Construction)
3 6th Street from Hermosa to Haven-Pavement Rehabilitation Gas Tax R&T 7360 11743035650/1849174-0 15,000
(Survey and Design,with Construction funded FY14/15) Gas Tax R&T 7360 11743035650/1849174-0 300.000
Note: possible CalRecycle 2 Rebate 315,000
4 8th Street from Baker to Hellman-Pavement Rehabilitation Gas Tax R&T 7360 11743035650/1851174-0 15,000
(Survey and Design,with Construction funded FY14/15) Gas Tax R&T 7360 11743035650/1851174-0 300,000
Note: possible CalRecycle 2 Rebate 315,000
5 9th Street from Railroad Spur to Hellman and Baker Ave from 8th to 9th Citywide Infrastructure 11983035650/1856198-0 70,000
Sidewalk Improvements(Design and Construction) Safe Rte To School Grant 12343035650/1856234-0 233.600
Note:SRTS State Cycle 10 Grant 303,800
6 9th Street north side from 100'west to 800'west of Vineyard-Sidewalk Citywide Infrastructure 11983035650/1808198-0 27,500
Improvements(Design and Construction) Safe Rte To School Grant 12343035650/1808234-0 90.800
Note:SRTS Federal Cycle 3 Grant 118,300
7 19th Street from West City Limit to Haven-Pavement Rehabilitation Measure 1 11773035650/1836177-0 300
(Continuation of Survey and Design.with Construction funded FY14/15) Measure 1 11773035650/1836177-0 1.375.000
Note'. possible CalRecycle 2 Rebate 1,375,500
8 Archibald Ave from 4th to Foothill-Pavement Rehabilitation Measure 1 11763035650/1852176-0 50,000
(Survey and Design,with Construction funded FW 5/16) Measure 1 11773035650/1852177-0 1,201,000
Note: possible CalRecycle 3 Rebate 1,251,000
9 Archibald Ave from Hillside to North City Limit-Pavement Rehabilitation Measure I 11773035650/1727177-0 500
(Continuation of Survey and Design,with Construction funded FY15/16) Measure I 11773035650/1727177-0 550,000
Note: possible CalRecycle 3 Rebate 550.500
' 10 Banyan Street from Merlot to Cantabda-Sidewalk North Side(1480 ft) Gas Tax RT7360 11743035650/1862174-0 66,000
(Design and Construction)
11 Base Line Rd-at 1-15 Interchange Transportation 11243035650/1361124-0 3,250,000
(Complete PS&E and start Construction) Citywide Infrastructure 11983035650/1361198-0 1,350,000
Tax Allocation Bonds 26608015650/1361260-0 31,400,000
MID Federal) xx=coo xxx/1361xxx-0 3,000,000
SAFETFA-LU(Federal) xx=000 xxx/1361xxx-0 40. 00.000
43,000,000
' 12 Beryl Street from Base Line to 19th-Sidewalk West Side(1155 ft) Gas Tax RT7360 11743035650/1863174-0 127,000
(Design and Construction)
13 Camelian St from Lemon Ave to Wilson Ave-Pavement Rehabilitation Measure 1 11773035650/1722177-0 500
' (Continuation of Survey and Design,with Construction funded FY15/16) Measure 1 11773035650/1722177-0 500 000
Note: possible CalRecycle 3 Rebate 500,500
14 Etiwanda Ave at Whittram-Widen Intersection and Install a Traffic Signal Transportation 11243035650/1840124-0 10,000
(Survey and Design,RAN FY14/15,with Construction funded FY15/16) Transportation 11243035650/1840124-0 510.000
' 520,000
15 Etiwanda Ave from 6th to Arrow Route-Street Widening Transportation 11243035650/1076124-0 25,000
(Survey and Design,with Construction FY15116 if funds are available) Citywide Infrastructure 1198303565011078198-0 25,000
' Unknown mcc000000W1076xxx-0 1,100,000
Unknown xxxxzn oomll076xxx-0 1,000,000
2,150,000
16 Foothill Blvd from Vineyard to Archibald-Pavement Rehabilitation Measure 1 11763035650/1855176-0 13,000
(Survey and Design,with Construction funded FYI 5/16) Measure 1 11773035650/1855177-0 80$000
Note: possible CalRecycle 3 Rebate 817,000
17 Haven Ave from Banyan to Wilson-Sidewalk East Side(2480 ft) Gas Tax RT7360 11743035650/1864174-0 110,860
(Design and Construction)
TV II
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA- CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM - FISCAL YEAR 2013/14
' No. Project Fund Account Amount(S)
18 Haven Ave from Wlson to North City Limit-Pavement Rehabilitation Measure 1 11763035650/1854176-0 15,000
' (Survey and Design,with Construction funded FY15/16) Measure I 11773035650/1854177-0 750,000
Note: possible CalRecycle 3 Rebate 765,000
19 Hellman Ave from Base Line Rd to 19th St-Pavement Rehabilitation Gas Tax RT7360 11743035650/1816174-0 500
1 (Continuation of Survey and Design,with Construction funded FY14/15) Gas Tax RT7360 11743035650/1816174-0 410.000
Note: possible CalRecycle 2 Rebate 410,500
20 Hermosa Ave from Banyan to W11son-Pavement Rehabilitation Gas Tax R5T 7360 11743035650/1815174-0 500
(Continuation of Design,with Construction FYI 5/16 if funds are available) Unknown xxxxxx xxxx/1815xxx-0 260 000
Related to Hermosa Storm dram 260.500
21 Hermosa Ave from Main Street to Arrow Route-Pavement Rehabilitation Gas Tax RT7360 11743035650/1850174-0 203,000
(Survey.Design and Construction)
' 22 Lemon Ave from Archibald to Haven-Pavement Rehabilitation Gas Tax RST 7360 11743035650/1793174-0 500
(Continuation of Design,with Construction FY17/18 if funds are available) Unknown r00000000a1u1793xxx-0 560-000
Related to Lemon storm drain 560,500
t 23 Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation at Various Locations Gas Tax RT73W 11743035650/1022174-0 1,721,380
(Survey,Design and Construction) Prop 42 11903035650/1022190-0 71.390
1,792,770
24 Madrone Ave Norm of 9m St-Widening with Southwest Cucamonga Park Gas Tax R&T 7360 11743035650/1818174-0 500
(Continuation of Survey and Design,With Construction funded FY14/15) Gas Tax R5T 7360 11743035650/1818174-0 127.200
127,700
25 Rochester from Foothill Blvd to Base Line Rd-Pavement Rehabilitation Measure 1 11773035650/1821177-0 500
(Continuation of Design,with Construction funded FYi6/17) Measure I 11773035650/1821177-0 590.000
590,500
26 Victoria Street from Etivranda to East City Limit-Wdening and Pavement Transportation 11243035650/1838124-0 25,000
Rehabilitation Measure 1 11763035650/1838176-0 15,000
' (Survey and Design,with Construction FY14/15 0 funds are available) Measure I 11773035650/1838177-0 10,000
Unknown xxxxxxxxx x/1838xxx-0 360.000
410,000
27 Youngs Canyon Road from Koch Place to Cherry Ave-Street Extension AD 88-2 Etiwanda/Highlnd 18133035650/1601813-0 501000
' (Environmental,conceptual design and Flood Control basins review/study, AD 58-2 Etmanda/Highlnd 18133035650/1501813-0 1,350,000
with Construction funded FY15/16) 1.400.000
Streets Un Funded Total: 12.350.200
Streets Funded Total: 46,221,330
I. Traffic
1 Day Creek Blvd at Silverbery St-Upgrade Traffic Signal Left Tum Phases Transportation 11243035650/1845124-0 25.000
' 2 Day Creek Blvd at Victoria Park Ln-Upgrade Traffic Signal Left Tum Phases Transportation 11243035650/1846124-0 25,000
3 Haven Ave at Valencia Ave-Left Tum Pocket Extension Transportation 11243035650/1841124-0 75,000
4 Traffic Management Center-Upgrade Project Citywide Transportation 11243035650/1831124-0 200,000
Traffic UnFunded Total. 0
Traffic Funded Total: 325,000
1
t
V
1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA- CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM - FISCAL YEAR 2013/14
tNo. Project Fund Account Amount(S)
J. Future&Unfunded Projects
' 1 Archibald Ave from Church to Palo Alto-Storm Drain Unknown xxxxxx Xx 0805xxx-0 1,215,000
(Design and Construction)
2 Arrow Route at Railroad Spur-New Concrete Panels Gas Tax R&T 7360 11743035650/1819174-0 75,000
' (Survey,Design and Construction)
3 Civic Center and Public Safety Building-Retrofit of Exterior Glass Doors Capital Reserve 1025001-5602 10,000
' 4 Civic Center-Earthquake Strapping Capital Reserve 1025001-pax 50,000
5 Etiwanda Ave-Grade Separation at Metrolink Tracks Unknown xxxxx=000i/1076xxx-0 35,000,000
between 6th St and Arrow Route(Prelim Design Study)
' 6 Ethvanda Creek Park-Phase II Park Development 11203055650/1664120-0 5,580,000
7 Fire District-Banyan Station 175 Expansion Fire Capital Projects 32885015650/1779288-0 2,500,000
8 Fire District-Central Station 178(New Fire Station) Fire Capital Projects 32885015650/1645288-0 8,000,000
9 Fire District-Operation/Dispatch Building Fire Capital Projects 32885015650/xxxx288-0 11,000,000
10 Fire District-San Bernardino Station 172 Demolition and Relocation Fire Capital Projects 32885015650/1733288-0 6,500,000
' 11 Foothill Blvd across SCE Corridor West of Day Creek Channel-Sidewalk Citywide Infrastructure 11983035650/1826198-0 145,000
(Surrey,Design and Construction)
12 Foothill Blvd from Grove Ave to San Bernardino Rd-Widening with Median Unknown Moocoabau/1189ro -o 4,830,000
' Island including Landscaped Median to Vineyard
(Right-of-Way and Construction FYI 5/16 if Ponds are available)
13 Hellman Avenue at Metrolink Tracks-Widen Crossing Unknown xxb0000c=11847x -I) 790,000
(Design,with Construction FY14/15 if funds are available)
14 Hermosa Park-Light Pole Replacements LMD 1 1130303-5607 25,000
15 Lions Park East Community Center-Replace Flooring Capital Reserve 1025001-5602 60,000
' 16 LMD 1 Trail-Concrete Drainage Improvement Beautification 11103165650/1551110-0 19,100
17 LMD 4R-Water Conservation and Landscape Renovations LMD 4R 11343035650/1787134-0 400,000
(Design and Construction of second phase of multi-phased project)
' 18 Milliken Ave at Mountain View Dr-Upgrade Traffic Signal Left Turn Phases Transportation 11243035650/1843124-0 25,000
19 Milliken Ave at Terre Vista Pkwy-Upgrade Traffic Signal Left Tum Phases Transportation 11243035650/1644124-0 25,000
' 20 Milliken Ave at Vintage-Upgrade Traffic Signal Left Tum Phases Transportation 11243035650/1253124-0 25,000
21 Pacific Electric Trail Enhancements-West to East City Limits Beautification 11103165650/1775110-0 10,000
Citywide Infrastructure 11983035650/1775198-0 100.000
110,000
22 Red Hill Park-Pe lestnan Paseo PD 85 Redemption 18483035650/1621848-0 100,000
23 Upper Cucamonga Stortn Drain Phase 3-East of Hellman to Base Line to Unknown Unknown 3,900,000
Roberds,North on Amethyst to 19th St,and Easterly 300 fast
(Construction FY14/15 if funds are available)
24 Vanous Intersections-Safety Light Upgrades Transportation 11243035650/1842124-0 150,000
' 25 Windrows Park-Fire Lane Repair Unknown Unknown 30,000
Future&Unfunded Total: 80,364,100
VI
oil
' Beautification
111111111111010.1
Typical Beautification projects include parkway
' landscape, median islands, plant material replacement, community
trail landscape and open space preservation. The City strives to plan and budget
for projects that exemplify Rancho Cucamonga's aesthetic standards, particularly in areas of the
City that are older and undergoing rehabilitation. Many Beautification projects bring these areas into alignment with the
rest of the City.
' The City adheres to a Xeriscape policy in all of its plant material selection, ensuring current water conservation stan-
dards, as well as the adaptability of plants, trees, flowers and shrubs to Southern California's warm and dry climate. This
practice helps to reduce ongoing maintenance and irrigation costs.
Beautification projects are typically funded via the Beautification Fund, which is a product of new residential and commer-
cial development fees. Other examples of funding include Park Development, Capital Reserves and Park and Landscape
Maintenance District funds.
fSources of Funding for FY 2013-14
' Project List& FY 2013-14 Expenditures
I. Archibald Ave from NIO Norbrook $500
to Carrari-Community Trail
' west side
2. Haven Ave from Wilson to Vivienda $500
Community Trail west side
Total $1,000
' $1,000
' ■Beautification
A
' JI Key: 1830
Archibald Avenue from North of Norbrook to Carrari Street-Community Trail West Side
Project Location:
West side of Archibald Avenue,
' north of Norbrook to Carrarl - - --
Street.
FARRARI ST
NORBROOK PROJECT LOCATION
Est.Construction Start/End: _HILLSIDE RD_ _
05/2015-06/2015 - -- - --—- - -
' Project Status: WILSONAVwE — WILSONikVE —
Design
Department:
Engineering
Project Manager:
Romeo David - -
Description: Construction of an equestrian trail on the west side of Archibald Avenue.Project includes the installation of a two rail PVC fence,
decomposed granite and mow curbs.
Justification: This project will connect to the existing community trail at the west side of Achibald Avenue and is part of the trail master plan.It
will also Improve the appearance of the west side of Archibald Avenue.
' Project Cost Estimate($):
Expenditure/Cate¢ory Prior Year, 2013114 201415 201516 201617 201718 TOTAL
' Environmental/NPDES $0 $o 50 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design/Plan Review 510,000 $500 $0 5o $0 So $10,500
' Right-of-Way So 5o $0 $0 $0 So So
Construction 50 50 $88,200 $0 $0 $0 $88,200
Inspection&Administration 50 $0 $5,000 $0 50 5o $5,000
' Contingency $0 $0 $9,800 $0 50 $0 591800
Total Costs: $10,000 $500 $103,000 $0 $0 $0 $113,500
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Year 201314 201415 201516 201617 201718 Tal"AL
' Beautification Fund(110) $10,000 $500 5o $0 $0 $o $10,500
Unfunded 50 50 $103,000 $0 $0 $0 $103,000
' Total Costs: $10,000 $5o0 $103,000 50 50 $0 $113.500
Impact on Operations: This project will add an additional quarter mile to the City's trail system which will require trash removal,weed
abatement, and routine maintenance. However, it will also remove 1,000 linear feet of City maintained public
landscape,saving the City approximately$1,100 per year. Staff is currently seeking grant funds for construction.
A-1
A Key: 1829 i
Haven Avenue from Wilson Avenue to Vivienda Street - Community Trail on the West Side
Project Location: i
West side of Haven Avenue from PROJECT LOCATION
Wilson Avenue to Vivienda Street — ---s----- ------- ------ —� t
Est.Construction Start/End:
04/2015-06/2015 -
VIVIENDA ST
HILLSIDE RD
Project Status:
Design -- -
-.._WILSON AVE
Department:
Engineering - _ __`- -- L
Project Manager: -
Romeo David --- - - - - r—r
Description: Construction of an equestrian trail on the west side of Haven Avenue. Project includes the installation of a two rail PVC fence,
decomposed granite and mow curbs.
Justification: This protect will connect to the existing community trail west of Haven Avenue and is part of the trail master plan. It will also
improve the appearance of the west side of Haven Avenue.
Project Cost Estimate($): ,
Expenditure/Cateaory Prior Years 2013114 2014/15 2015/1 2016117 2017/18 TOTAL ,
Environmental/NPDES 5o $o $o 50 $o $0 $0
Design/Plan Review $2,000 $500 $0 50 $0 $0 $2,500 '
Right-of-Way $o $o $0 So $0 $o $0
Construction $0 So 511,500 So $0 $0 $1111500
Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $2,500 $0 $0 so $2,500 '
Contingency $o s0 $11,000 $0 So so 511,000
Total Costs: 52,000 $500 $125,0110 $0 $0 $0 $17,500
Project Funding: ,
Funding Source Prior Years 2013114 2014/15 201511 2016/17 2017/1 TOTAL '
Beautification Fund(110) $50,000 $500 $0 $0 $0 $o $so,s00
Unfunded 5o $0 $125,000 $0 $0 So $125,000
Total Costs: $50,000 $5110 $15,000 $o $o $o $175,500 '
Impact on Operations: This project will add an additional quarter mile to the City's trail inventory, requiring trash removal, weed
abatement,and routine maintenance. ,
A-2 ,
rqo
l _
Drainage
Drainage projects include the construction of
new storm drains, storm drain lateral connections, flood control
channels, catch basins, debris racks and other forms of infrastructure that protect
the public right-of-way from hazards caused by flooding and severe weather events.
' Drainage projects are scheduled and planned due to the availability of funding, safety concerns, new development, and
weather/emergency events. In extreme circumstances, inadequate drainage can prevent development from taking place.
The City consults with many other agencies when constructing new drainage improvements, including utility companies,
the Cucamonga Valley Water District, the San Bernardino Flood Control District and the Army Corps of Engineers, as
needs dictate.
' Drainage projects are typically funded from Drainage Funds and eligible street funding sources such as Measure I or Gas
i
Tax.
Sources of Funding for FY 2013-14
' $1.000
Project List & FY 2013-14 Expenditures
' I. Hermosa Ave - Alta Loma Basin $500
to Wilson Ave Storm Drain
' 2. Lemon Ave - Haven to 1,300' $500
west Storm Drain
' Total $1,000
■General Drainage
B
JL Key'. 1810
Hermosa Avenue from the Alta Loma Basin to Wilson Avenue - Storm Drain
Project Location:
Hermosa Avenue, from Alta Loma _
Basin to Wilson Avenue - -
HILLSIDE RD
i
WILSON AVE — -- -- -- —
a� _ P [JEC7 W
Est Construction 5tart/End: '-o - a �� w04/2016-09/2016 -- -� - Nz0
¢Project Status: - - = BANYAN ST -- -
' Design
Department:
Engineering -
Project Manager:
' Curt eillings -
Description: Construct a master plan storm drain, install mainline, catch basins and manholes.The entire street Alta Loma Basin to Wilson
Avenue will be resurfaced upon completion.
' Justification: This project will improve drainage and extend pavement life,use,and rideability.Also,during rain events it will provide improved
pedestrian access to the Hermosa Intermediate School at Wilson Avenue and Hermosa Avenue.
' Project Cost Estimate($):
' Expenditure/Catezory Prior Year 2013/1 2014/15 2015/1 2016/17 2017/18 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design/Plan Review $10,DOo $500 $500 $0 $0 $0 $11,000
' Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $0 $0 $1,900,000 $0 $0 $1,900,000
t
Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $0 $45,000 $0 $0 $45,000
Contingency $0 $0 $D $300,000 $0 $0 $300,000
Total Costs: $10,000 $500 $500 $2,245,000 $0 $0 $2,256,000
Project Funding:
' Fundine Source Prior Years 2013/1 2014115 2015/16 2016/17 2017/1 TOTAL
Drainage General Fund(112) $10,000 SSW $500 $0 $0 $0 $1000
Unfunded $0 $0 $0 $2,245,000 $0 $0 $2,245,000
' Total Costs: $10,000 $500 $500 $2,245,000 $0 $0 $2,256,000
Impact on Operations: Elimination of storm water protection costs for placing sand bags and cleanup,and a reduction of street repair
' maintenance costs for pothole and crack repairs,thus freeing up maintenance crews for other areas.
B-f
JL Key: 1791 '
Lemon Avenue from Haven Avenue to 1,300 feet west -Storm Drain
Project Location:
Lemon Avenue,Haven Avenue to -- -_-.. ---
1300 ft west -- - -- - _ _
- - . . _ .
--- _ _ HILLSIDE RD
WILSONAVE _-- - — - _
Est.Construction Start/End: a FY 2017/18
— PROJECT LO ATJO
U
Project Status: ¢ - -_
Design -_ BANYAN ST
Department: LEMON-AVE-
Engineering
VE_Engineering
Project Manager: `" -
Curt Billings _ /
Description: Construct a master plan storm drain,install mainline,catch basins and manholes.The entire street from Archibald Avenue to
Haven Avenue will be resurfaced upon completion. '
Justification: This project will improve drainage and extend pavement life,use,and rideability.Also,during rain events it will provide improved
pedestrian access
1
Project Cost Estimate($1:
Expenditure/Category Prior-Years 2013/1 2014/15 2015/1 2016/1 2017/1 TOTAL ,
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design/Plan Review $2,000 $500 $500 $500 $500 $0 $4,000 '
Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,520,000 $1,520,000
Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000 $10,000 '
Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $170,000 $170,000
Total Costs: $2,000 $500 $500 $500 $500 $1,700,000 $1,704,000 '
Project Funding:
Funding Prior Years 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016/1 2017/18 TOTAL '
Drainage General Fund(112) $2,000 $500 $500 $500 $500 $0 $4,000
Unfunded $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,700,000 $1,700,000
Total Costs: $2,000 $500 $500 $500 $500 $1,700,000 $1,704,000 '
Impact on Operations: Elimination of storm water protection costs for placing sand bags and cleanup, and a reduction of street repair ,
maintenance casts for pothole and crack repairs,thus freeing up maintenance crews for other areas.
B-2 '
i �
1 Facilities
1
Projects that construct new buildings or that ei-
ther improve, add on to, or renovate existing buildings and ancillary
structures are typically classified as Facilities Projects. These
projects ultimately result in new structures being added to the City's fixed facility inventory;
1 however, some projects placed in this category are considered capital rehabilitation as they focus on the
remodeling or restoration of existing facilities.
1 The majority of these projects are funded via City Reserve funds. Major projects may qualify for state, federal and/or
grant funding.
1 Typical operating expenses for facilities include increases in staffing, building and systems maintenance costs, overhead
expenses and utilities.
1 Project List& FY 2013-14 Expenditures Sources of Funding for FY 2013-14
I. Central Park - Replace Flooring $130,000
1 2. Civic Center- Landscape Renovation $30,000 $233 000 $UO 000
Design
sz7so0
3. Civic Center- Parking and Exterior $170,500
1 Lighting
4. Civic Center- Roof and Patio Re- $1,050.000 5250 000 ,..
placement
1 5. Corporate Yard-Additional $471,000 $1,70500
CNG Compressor, Fuel
Management System,and Time Fuel W0,00o
Posts
' 6. Corporate Yard and Sports $39,500
Complex- Retrofit Gasoline
Above Ground Storage Tanks
' 7. Council Chambers-Audio-Visual $300,000
Redesign ■Capital Reserves ■Fire Capital Projects
8. Cultural Arts Center- Paint Lobby $90.000
' 9. Fire District-jersey Station 174 $500,000 ®Library Capital Reserve ■Equip/Vehicle Replacemet
Training Facility
10.Paul A. Biane Library-Second Floor $250,000
1 Rancho KIDS Project AB 2766 ❑Law Enforcement Resery
11.Public Safety Building- HVAC IAQ $100,000
1 Total $3,131,000
C
1
' Central Park - Replace Flooring JL Key:
' Project location: Liu
Central Park,Goldy S.Lewis
Comm unity Center' l C�0 11200 Base Line Road V �I � v
(f s
LOCA ON
t Est Construction Start/End: ��� '-� F �+
08/2013-05/2014
Project Status:
Requested FY 2013-2014 D� CENTRAL ® oo`��
PARK \� o
Department: Fl�j a UC 0
Public Works Services21 'f
Project Manager: (�
Ty Quaintance � � �f7F cl
Description: Replace Flooring in the Drier Hall and the Rancho Cucamonga Hall at the Goldy S.Lewis Community Center.
' Justification: The Flooring in these two meeting halls are deteriorating as a result of heavy use. For safety and aesthic reasons, the flooring
needs to be replaced.
' Project Cost Estimate(S):
' Expenditure/Catecory Prior years 2013/1 2014/15 2015/1 2016/17 2017/1 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 SO $0 $0 $0 $0
Design/Plan Review $o SO $0 $0 50 $0 so
Right-of-Way $0 $0 So $o $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $130,000 $0 $0 50 $0 $130,000
' Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Contingency $0 $0 $0 SO $0 $0 50
Total Costs: $0 $130,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $130,000
' Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior years 2013/1 2014115 2015/1 2016/17 2017/28 TOTAL
Capital Reserve(025) $0 S1301000 SO $0 $0 $0 $130,000
Total Costs: 50 $130,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $130,000
Impact on Operations: Less staff time and effort will be needed to maintain the new Flooring.
1
' C-1
JL Key: 1
Civic Center - Landscape Renovation Design
Project Location: ,
Civic Center v L/ �u.� w
LE
J ate; Oa �
Est.Construction Start/End: _ PROJ CT LOC ION
Fall 2013-Spring 2014 88
Project Status:
Requested FY 2013-2014 ❑ ,
tt
Department:
Public Works Services '
Project Manager.
Dean Rodia '
Description: Retrofit low water use landscaping around Civic Center.
Justification: Cost savings for maintenance and reduced water usage for irrigation. '
Project Cost Estimate($): 1
Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2013/14 2014/15 2015/1 2016/17 2017/1 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $0 1
Design/Plan Review $0 $30,000 $0 $0 50 $0 $30,000
Right-of-Way $o $0 W $0 $0 $o So
Construction $o $o $o $o $o $o So
Inspection&Administration $o $o $0 $o $o $0 so
Contingency $0 $0 $0 So $0 $0 so '
Total Costs: $o $30,000 $o $0 $o $0 $30,000
Project Funding: '
Funding Source Prior Years 201314 201415 201516 201617 21718 TOTAL
Capital Reserve(025) $0 $30,000 $0 $0 $o $o $30,000 1
Total Costs: $0 $30,000 $0 50 $0 50 $30,000
Impact on Operations: The new landscaping will require less time and personnel to maintain. Likewise, less water will be needed to '
irrigate the new landscaping. Finally,the new landscaping will comply with State Low Water Use Requirements.
1
C-2 1
1 JL Key:
Civic Center - Parking and Exterior Lighting
1 Project location:
Civic Center Parking Lots(3) 10500 I�1 L/Civic Center Drive uu
t -J -� O
PROJ CT LOC ION
Est.Construction Start/End: 88
08/2013-05/2014 �7
Project Status:
tRequested FY 2013-2014 ❑
Department:
Public Works Services Jo —
Project Manager:
1 Ty Quaintance
Description: Replace the existing City Hall parking lot light fixtures with LED lighting fixtures.
1
Justification: Currently, there are forty eight (48) - 250 watt HPS lighting fixtures in the City Hall parking lots. These fixtures total twelve
thousand(12,000)watts. The new 140 watt LED fixtures require only six thousand seven hundred(6,700)watts.
1 Project Cost Estimate(S):
Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2013/1 2014/15 2015/1 2016/1 2017/18 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
1 Design/Plan Review $0 $0 $0 50 $0 $0 $0
Right-of-Way $o $0 $0 $0 $0 50 $0
1 Construction $o $170,500 $0 50 $0 $o $170,500
Inspection&Administration $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $o $0
Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $o $0 $0
' Total Costs: $0 $170,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $170,500
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 201314 201415 201516 201617 201718 TOTAL
Capital Reserve(025) $0 $170,500 $0 $0 $0 50 $170,500
Total Costs: $0 $170,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $170,500
Impact on Operations: The new LED fixtures consume less electricity, resulting in a reduction in utility costs. The new LED fixtures also
1 have a longer service life,which will ultimately result in the reduction of maintenance costs. Because of these cost
savings,the payback time for using LED fixtures is approximately 4 years.
1
1 C-3
JL Key: ,
Civic Center - Roof and Patio Replacement
Project location:
Civic Center
U J
10500 Civic Center Drive 1 ��y
R �I
11
C
Est.Construction Start/End: PROJ CT LOC ION
86
08/2013-05/2014
Project Status:
Requested FY 2013-2014
Public Works Services
1Io '
Project Manager:
Ty Quaintance
Description: Replace the existing roof and patio membrane at the Civic Center.
1
Justification: The roof is 17 yeah old and is showing signs of failure. The existing membrane on the patios are also failing. For safety reasons,
both Items need to be replaced.
Project Cost Estimate I$):
Expenditure/Categon Prior Years 2013/1 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 TOTAL ,
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $o $o $o
Design/Plan Review $0 $o % $0 $o $0 $0 ,
Right-of-way $o $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $1,050,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,050,000
Inspection&Administration $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 '
Contingency 5o $o $0 $0 $o $0 $0
Total costs: $o $1,050,000 $o $0 $0 $0 51,050,000 '
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 201314 201415 201516 201617 201718 TOTAL ,
Capital Reserve(025) $0 $1,050,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,050,000
Total Costs: $0 $1,050,0011 $o $0 5o $0 $1,050,000
Impact on Operations: With the replacement of the roof and patio membrane, water leakage into various offices and their time '
consuming cleanup will cease.
C-
A Key:
Corporate Yard - Additional CNG Compressor, Fuel Management System, and Time Fill Posts
Project Location:
Corporate Yard OU
NTRY � ( —
' 91539th Street LUB �,.IU
Est.Construction Start/End: J
08/2013-10/2013 I - JECT LO TI 41P (��=l
l
Project status. IkySu��nn1 n
Requested FY 2013-2014 i o �I I
Department: -1 �1�ILJIC�
Public Works Services
IF 1�7-
Project Manager: 1 -
Ernest Ruiz
I
Description: Compressed Natural Gas Fuel Station Expansion to include compressor,spare parts kit for compressor,fuel management system for
fast fill dispenser,5 quad time fill posts,2light posts,concrete pad,and bollards.
Justification: The City fleet has grown in size and continues to purchase both heavy-duty and light-duty CNG vehicles.The expansion of the CNG
1 Fueling Station will double its output of 400 DGE to 800 DGE during an eight hour period.
Project Cost Estimate($):
Expenditure/Catesory Prior Years 2013/14 2014115 2015/1 2016/17 201711 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES 50 $0 00 50 5o 00 $0
Design/Plan Review $24,000 $0 50 $0 $0 $0 $24,000
Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 So $o $0 $o
Construction $0 $421,000 50 So $o 50 $421,000
Inspection&Administration $0 57,900 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,900
Contingency So $42,100 $0 $0 $0 $0 $42,100
Total costs: $24,000 $471,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $495,000
Project Funding:
' Funding Source Prior Years 201314 201415 201516 2016/17 201718 TOTAL
Equip/Vehicle Replacement(712) $12,000 $233,000 5o $o $0 $0 $245,000
Ag 2766 Air Quality lmpv(105) $12,000 $238,000 00 so SO $0 $250,000
Total Costs: $24,000 $471,000 $0 So $0 $0 $495,000
Impact on Operations: None
' C-5
IL Key
Corporate Yard and Sports Complex - Retrofit of Gasoline Above Ground Storage Tanks
Project Location: OUNTRY 'I� T
Corporate Yard&Sports Complex CLUBL �I
Est.Construction Start/End: nI I ECT L TI r^� ISI
07/2013-09/201310f C Q
Project Status:
U 7 1 ,
Requested FY 2013-2014
n
� U��JM m
4
Department: I� LL=1L7FR
Public Works Services I u< U
Project Manager:
I�
Ernie Ruiz
Description: Replace existing Phase I emergency vent valves,install Enhanced Vapor Recovery(EVR)overfill prevention valves,new EVR drop
tubes,new EVR fill adapters with lockable dust caps,and install EVR top fill spill containers,etc.
Justification: Currently,Above ground Storage Tanks(AST)meet California Air Resources Board Enhanced Vapor Recovery(CARS EVR)Phase I
regulations. CARS regulations require AST to be upgraded to meet new EVR Phase 11 regulations by end of 2014.
Project Cost Estimate(S):
Exoenditure/Cateeory Prior Years 2013/14 2014115 201511 2016/17 2017/1 TOTAL
Environmentai/NPDE$ so so so so $0 so $0
Design/Plan Review so so so $0 $0 $0 so '
Right-of-Way so $0 $0 50 $0 $0 so
Construction so $35,000 $0 $0 50 $0 $35,000
Inspection&Administration so $1,000 $0 50 $0 $0 $1,000
Contingency $0 53,500 So $0 50 $o $3,500
Total Costs: $o $39,Soo $0 $0 $0 $0 $39,500
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 2013/14 2014/1 2015/1 2016/1 2017/1 TOTAL '
AB2766 Air Qual lmprv(105) $0 539,500 $0 $o $0 $0 $39,500
Total Costs: $0 $39,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $39,500
Impact on Operations: There will be temporary restrictions for use of the AST's while they are being brought into compliance with CARB '
EVR phase II regulations.
C- '
' JL Key:
Council Chamber - Audio-Visual Redesign
' Project Location:
Civic Center City Council Chamber �
_]I
10500 Civic Center Drive ( j�j \�)IUU() l l
Est.Construction Start/End: PROJ CT LOC ION
Fall/Winter 2013 68
Project Status:
Requested FY 2013-2014 ❑
O
Department:
J N
Public Works Services
Project Manager:
Bill Wittkopf
Description: Redesign of the audio-visual system in the City Council Chambers.
Justification: The existing audio-visual system has been failing on a regular basis- microphones go silent,electric vote tabulator stops working
during meetings requiring council or commission members to hand vote,feed to meeting broadcast is disrupted,etc.
Project Cost Estimate($):
' Expenditure/Category Prior Year 2013 14 1014/1 2015 16 1016/17 2017/1 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design/Plan Review $0 $0 $0 $0 So $0 $0
Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $300,000 $0 50 $0 $0 $300,000
Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Costs: $0 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 2013/14 2014/15 2015/1 2016/17 2017118 TOTAL
' Capital Reserve(025) $0 $300,000 $0 so $0 $0 $300,000
Total Costs: $0 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000
Impact on Operations: With a fully functional audio-visual system, council/commission meetings will go smoother, disruptions of the
electronic meeting broadcast will cease,and the cable system will a receive consistent feed.
t
t C-7
JL Key: '
Cultural Arts Center - Paint Lobby
Project Location:
Cultural Arts Center j
12505 Cultural Center Drive
RAL CENT
a
Est.Construction Start/End:
08/2013-05/2014 PROJECT LOC ION
J
Project Status: I1.1
Requested FY 2013-2014 V '
}
Department: Q
Public Works Services
Project Manager:
Ty Ouaintance
Description: Paint main lobby and walls along main staircase of Culteral Arts Center(CAC).
Justification: The Cultural Arts Center(CAC)building has been open for six(6)years. High traffic from public attendance of various Community t
Services Department events has diminished the appearance of these areas. Anew coat of paint will restore luster to these public
areas. ,
Project Cost Estimate ISI:
Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2013/14 2014/15 2015/1 2016/17 2017/1 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES SO $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design/Plan Review $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 '
Right-of-Way $0 $0 $o SO So $0 $0
Construction $0 $90,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $90,000
Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $o $0 $0
Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $o $0 $0
Total Costs: $0 $90,000 $0 $o $0 $0 $90,000
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 2013114 2014/15 2015/1 2016/17 2017/1 TOTAL '
Capital Reserve Fund(025) $0 $90,OOo $0 $0 $0 $0 590,000
Total Costs: $0 $90,000 SO $0 $0 $0 $90,000
Impact on Operations: Painting will be scheduled around the Community Services Department theater season to minimize impact.
1
C-8 '
' JL Key: 1735
Fire District - Jersey Station 174 Training Facility
Project Location: - 'L — UL
Jersey Station(174)
' 11297 Jersey Boulevard iL =� 86 a
' Est.Construction Start/End: P OJEC LO ATION
2014/15-2015/16 ISI
uu r
Project Status:
RFP for Architect for Design LE
7
Department:
' Fire Protection District
Project Manager:
tChief Cloughesy/Pamela Pane
Description: Design concepts only of a training facility for the Fire Protection District at Fire Station 174.
Justification: A training facility has been included in the current and previous Strategic Plan and has been part of the Jersey Station Master Plan since its
Inception. Several multi-story hotels have been constructed and additional mid-rise professional offices are proposed in the future
necessitating this training tower. It will include expanded classrooms,a live bum building,multi-story training building and other props.
Could potentially include a Dispatch component and back-up Emergency Operations Center(EOC).
Project Cost Estimate S):
' Expenditure/Category Prior Year 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016/1 201711 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 50 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design/Plan Review $0 $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000
Right-of-Way 50 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $0 $10,000,000 $0 so $0 $10,000,000
Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Costs: $0 $500,000 $10,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $30,500,000
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Year 2013114 2014/15 2015 16 2016117 2017/18 TOTAL
Fire Capital Projects(288) $0 $500,000 $10,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $10,500,000
Total Costs: $0 $500,000 $10,000,000 $0 $0 s0 $10,500,000
Impact on Operations: Fire District operations and maintenance costs will increase. The cost wil be better determined after the design
phase is complete. Opportunities may exist for regional partnerships that could help affect operational costs.
C-9
,Paul A. Biane Library - Second Floor Rancho KIDS Project 1L Key: 1867
Project location: '
Paul A.Biane Library
12505 Cultural Center Drive CHURCH STREET .�
m I�
PROJECT LOCATION a ,
Est.Construction Start/End: 2,
FY 2013/14 N�rvau caner Harr
o _ ,O
Project Status:
NLNYL ,'f^ Ikvrrmo
Design/Construction luarrewroerevcrme� _cnns, enucrw
i
Department:
Library tz -
xm - I_ oaao L
Project Manager:
Robert Karatsu =
Description: Rancho KIDS is a project that will build out the second floor of the Paul A. Biane Library at Victoria Gardens. Rancho KIDS is '
envisioned as an interactive children's museum combined with traditional library services to create a new type of learning
experience for children ages 0-7(and their parents)in our community. ,
Justification: Demand for library services In the community continues to increase,particularly for the ages 0-7. Rancho KIDS Is being designed
to provide a new,unique service model that will combine the features of interactive children's museum exhibits with traditional '
library services. Rancho KIDS should also be a regional draw that will provide additional visitors to both the Victoria Gardens
Shopping District and the Lewis Family Playhouse.
Project Cost Estimate($): '
Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/1 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 50 $0 $0 $0 50 t
Design/Plan Review $90,000 $250,000 $0 $150,000 $0 $0 $490,000
Right-of-Way $0 $0 So 50 $o $0 $0
Construction $0 $D $2,000,1300 $0 $3,500,000 $4 $5,500,000
Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $0 50 $0 $0 $0
Contingency $0 $0 $200,000 $0 5300,000 $0 $500,000
Total costs: $90,000 $250,000 $2,200,000 $150,000 $3,800,000 so $6,490,000
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 201611 2017/1 TOTAL
Library Services Fund(290) $900000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $90,000
Library Capital Reserve(329) $0 $250,000 $2,200,000 $150,000 $3,800,000 50 56,400,000
Total Costs: $90,000 $250,000 $2,200,000 $1501000 $3,800,000 $0 56,490,000
Impact on Operations: Feasibility study projects an approximate$250,000 per year cost for operations and maintenance. (The project is
designed to be revenue-generating.)
C-10 '
' A Key'.
Public Safety Building- HVAC IAQ
Project Location: SII
Public Safety Building
10510 Civic Center Drive
Est Construction Start/End: PROJ CT LOC ION
08/2013-05/2014 86
Project Status:
Requested FY 2013-2014
Department:
Public Works Services
Project Manager.
Ty Quaintance
Description: Mechanical design and specifications for altering Air Handlers 1 and 2,which are located in the Public Safety building.
t
Justification: The intake and exhaust systems of Air Handlers 1 and 2 need to be redone to meet current standards.
Project Cost Estimate($):
Expenditure/Category Prior Year 2013/1 2014/15 2015/1 201611 2017/1 TOTAL
EnvironmentaVNPDES $o $0 $0 50 $0 $o 50
Design/Plan Review $o $100,000 s0 s0 $0 $0 $100,000
Right-of-Way $0 50 $0 50 $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $o $0 so $0 $0 $0
' Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $o $0 5o $0 So
Contingency $0 $0 $0 50 $o $0 so
Total Costs: $o $100,000 $0 $0 $o $0 $100,000
Project Funding:
' Funding Source Prior Years 2013114 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017 18 TOTAL
Law Enforcement Reserve(017) $0 $100,000 $0 $0 50 5o $100,000
Total Costs: $0 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000
Impact on Operations: None
C-11
1
' f
Miscellaneous
Miscellaneous projects are the capital
undertakings that do not qualify for classification into the other pro-
ject categories. These are often one-time projects that are prompted by factors
such as:
- State or Federal Mandates
- Community Health and Safety Issues
- Council Goals and Priorities
- Regional Needs Assessments
- Interagency Agreements
- External Funding Arrangements
These projects may or may not have maintenance obligations and they are typically funded from a variety of special fund-
ing sources: they are rarely funded via the General Fund.
Sources of Funding for FY 2013-14
' $300.000
$392.200
tProject List& FY 2013-14 Expenditures
1.ADA Ramps at Various Locations $300,000
2.Arrow Route Utility Underground $1,000
3. Base Line Rd @ I—I S -Utility $500,000 $561.170
Underground
4. Base Line Rd Utility Underground $554,570
-Carnelian to Vineyard
$1,000,000
S. LED Street Light Enhancement $1,000,000
Project
$125,000
6. Pacific Electric Trail @ Day Creek $275,000
Channel Connection
Total $2,630,570 ■Underground Utilities ■Transportation
Citywide Infrastructure ■SLD 8
■Measure"I" ■ Ped Grant Article 3
D
r
JL Key: 1150
Americans With Disabilities Act - Ramps at Various Locations
Project Location:
Various locations City Wide --
Est.Construction Start/End:
' 01/2014-02/2014
1
0
Y
Project Status: '
Design and Construction
Department:
Engineering
PROJECT LOCATION:
C I T Y W I D E
Project Manager:
' Curt Billings
Description: Construct Americans With Disabilities Act(ADA)compliant ramps at various locations citywide. Locations for ramp installations
' come from the AOA Transition Plan,which is updated annually.This capital project encompasses all ADA compliance issues that
cannot be incorporated into other improvement projects,but must be addressed in a timely fashion.
Justification: Meets the City's ongoing commitment to install ADA ramps where they are missing and are required by law.
' Project Cost Estimate($):
Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2013/1 2014/15 2015/1 2016117 2017/18 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design/Plan Review $0 $0 $0 $5,400 $5,400 $5,400 $16,200
Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 So $0 $0 $0
Construction $2,000 $268,000 $0 $86,000 $86,000 $86,000 $528,000
Inspection&Administration $0 $12,000 $0 50 $0 $0 512,000
Contingency $o $20,000 50 $8,600 $8,600 58,600 $45,800
Total Costs: $2,000 $300,000 $0 $100,000 $1001000 $100,000 $602,000
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 2013/14 2014/15 201511 2016117 2017/1 TOTAL
Measure l Fund(176) $0 $100,000 $o $0 50 $0 $100,000
Measure I Fund(177) $2,000 5200,000 $0 5100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $502,000
Total Costs: $2,000 $300,000 so $100,000 $1001000 $100,000 $602,000
Impact on Operations: None
i
D-1
iL Key: 1777
Arrow Route Utility Underground - Bear Gulch to West of Archibald Avenue
Project Location:
Arrow Route from Bear Gulch to
west of Archibald Avenue
FOOTHILL BLVD
Est.Construction Start/End:
09/2013-03/2015 S - — - x
ARROW ROUTE
Project status: - - - - —--- a
Budget 9TH STREET PIRJECT LOCATION: -
Department: YARD ----
Engineering
Project Manager:
Walt Stickney '
Description: This project will underground a stretch of existing overhead utilities along Arrow Route from Bear Gulch to west of Archibald
Avenue.
Justification: The removal of the overhead utilities,by placing them underground,improves the aesthetic appearance of the area. '
Project Cost Estimate($): ,
Expenditure Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2013/14 2014/15 2015/1 2016/1 2017/1 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 50 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design/Plan Review $0 $1,000 $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $16,000
Right-of-Way $o 50 $0 $0 $o $0 $0
Construction $0 $0 $626,690 $0 $0 $0 $626,690
Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $15,000 $0 50 $0 $15,000
Contingency So so $62,670 $0 $0 $0 $62,670
Total Costs: $0 $1,000 $719,360 $0 $0 $0 $720,360
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 2013/14 2014/15 201S/16 2016/17 2017/1 TOTAL
Underground Utilities(129) 50 $1,000 $719,360 $0 $0 $0 $720,360
Total Costs: $0 $1,000 $719,360 $0 $0 $0 $720,360
Impact on Operations: None
D-2
' JL Key 1848
Base Line Road at 1-15 Freeway - Utility Underground
Project Location:
On Base Line Road between
Etiwanda Avenue and East Avenue
ROJECT I-ty
'f
CATION_%%; %i
Est.Construction Start/End:
08/2013-10/2013
' Project Status:
Design and Construction lri
Department:
Engineering
J L_Project Manager:
W Stickney
Description: The project places overhead utilities undground in the vicinity of the Base Line Road at I-15 Interchange.
Justification: In coordination with the improvements to the Base Line Road at 1-15 Interchange being proposed for FY 2013/14,the overhead
SCE lines on Base Une Road and East Avenue will be placed underground.
Project Cost Estimate($):
Exoencirture/Category Prior Year 2013/1 2014115 2015/1 2016/17 2017/1 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES So $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design/Plan Review $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 50
Right-of-Way $0 $o $0 $o $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000
Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $0 $o $0 $o $0
Contingency So $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $o
Total Costs: $0 $500,000 $o $0 $0 $0 5500,000
project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 2013/1 2014115 2015/1 201611 2017/18 TOTAL
Transportation(124) $o $252,200 $0 $0 $0 $0 $252,200
Underground Util(129) $0 $5,600 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,600
City-wide Infrastructure(198) $0 $242,200 $0 $0 $0 $0 $242,200
Total Costs: $0 $500,000 $0 50 $0 $0 $500,000
Impact on Operations: None
' D-3
JL Key 1776
Base Line Road Utility Underground - Carnelian Street to Vineyard Avenue
Project Location: 19TH ST
Base Line Road from Carnelian �— --- ---�-_ - -- - ---
Street to Vineyard Avenue
z IIYY m
Or _ -
Est.Construction Start/End: _
07/2014-03/2015 n - BASE LINE RD
Project Status: I _ RED
HILL
r
Budget f - q ARK 3H P oitc LOC TION ,
Department: - =—NITIMI ? CHURCH ST
Engineering
RED S
b _
HILL - -
Project Manager: COUNTR --- — - - , _-
CLUB
Jerry A.Dyer - - - - - - -
Description: This project will underground a stretch of existing overhead utilities along Base Line Road from Carnelian Street to Vineyard
Avenue.
Justification: The removal of the overhead utilities by placing them underground improves the aesthetic appearance of the area.
Project Cost Estimate($j: '
Expenditure/Cateaory Prior Years 2013/14 2014/15 201511 2016/17 2017/18 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $o $0
Design/Plan Review $0 $10,000 $0 $o $0 $0 $10,000
Right-of-Way $o $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $o $481,470 $0 $0 $0 $0 $081,420
Inspection&Administration $0 $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,000
Contingency $0 $4$150 $o So $0 $0 $48,150
Total Costs: $0 $554,570 $0 $0 $0 $0 $554,570
Project Funding: '
Funding Source Prior Years 2013/14 2014/15 201511 2016/1 2017118 TOTAL ,
Underground Utilities(129) $o $550,570 $0 $0 $0 $0 $554,570
Total Costs: $0 $554,570 $0 $0 $0 $0 $554,570
Impact on Operations: None
1
1
D-4 '
t
Project Number:
1L Key: 1866
LED Street Light Enhancement Project
Project Location: --�
Street Lighting District N8
Ll p
7
Est.Construction Start/End:
icTOia a
10/2013-01/2014 ' R 0111 EJC T
Project Status: h �■(,��■I��/�.JA�I�'J�NI
Construction 5 �^ / U v.:/J' EON
1 Department:
Engineering 6 6
' Project Manager: E F/
CB��
W 5tickney
' Description: Replace the existing street light cobra head fixtures to LED.
' Justification: In coordination with Southern California Edison replacing the existing street light cobra fixtures to LED will result In annual energy
savings,which will pay for the one-time investment over time.
Project Cost Estimate ISI:
Expenditure/Category Prior years 2013/14 2014 1 2015116 2016/17 2017 18 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design/Plan Review $0 $0 $0 $o $0 $0 So
Right-of-way $0 SO $0 $o $0 so $0
Construction $0 51,000.000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,000.000
Inspection&Administration $o So $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Contingency $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Costs: 50 5?OOOA00 $0 $0 $0 $0 51,000.000
' Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 2013/1 2014/1 201511 2016/1 2017/18 TOTAL
SLD#8(158) 50 $I,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000
Total Costs: $0 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000
Impact on Operations: Overall annual energy savings.
' D-5
JL Key: 1827 '
Pacific Electric Trail at Day Creek Channel Connection
Project Location: v
Pacific Electric Trail at Day Creek ��
Channel L '
s.
� I�� !
PMN
C �
Est.Construction Start/End: v. JECT LOC 1 � �.
11/2013-01/2014 vw
NORO
ARK
�4 Cyt
ProjectStatus:
IU O
Construction /_3LJIUI
[J� \U�U(LI( [310)
Department: O
Engineering (\\ \
Ip L t
Project Manager:
Walt Stickney I=
Description: The project will connect the Pacific Electric Trail with the Day Creek Channel path.
Justification: The City and County have worked out an agreement which will permit the pedestrian use of the Day Creek Channel maintenance
path. This project will tie that channel path into the existing Pacific Electric Trail.
Project Cost Estimate($): '
Exoenditure/CateRory Prior Years 2013/14 2014/15 201S/1 2016117 201711 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 50 $0 $0 $0 SD $0
Design/Plan Review $36,600 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $36,600
Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 50 $250,000
Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $o $0
Contingency $0 525,000 $0 So $0 $0 $25,000
Total Costs: $36,600 $275,000 $0 50 $0 $0 $311,600
Project Funding: '
Funding Source Prior Years 2013/ 201415 201516 201617 201718 TOTAL
City-wide Infrastructure(198) $36,600 $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $186,60D
Ped Grant Article 3(214) $0 $125,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $125,000
Total Costs: $36,600 $275,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $311,600
Impact on Operations: Maintenance will be minimal. The connection will be a durable surface such as concrete which will require
sweeping.
D-6 '
rr, --rir
f�x
I
Municial U
p tili
t
Y
The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility
(RCMU) was formed by the City Council in 2001 in response to the
California Energy Crisis of 2000-2001. RCMU served its first customers in 2003
and finished construction of the Victoria Arbors substation in 2004. Currently, RCMU services
' approximately 500 customers in its service area. Annually, more than 72,000 megawatt-hours of electricity are
distributed to our customers via 20 circuit miles of wire spread across the roughly 4-square miles of service territory.
RCMU's historical peak demand is 17.5 megawatts, set in August 2011.
' RCMU capital projects are related to the maintenance, expansion and improvement of the RCMU distribution system.
RCMU's distribution system was designed to minimize maintenance and operating costs and ensure maximum reliability
of service.
Sources of Funding for FY 2013-14
$469,040
Project List & FY 2013-14 Expenditures
1. Church Street- Line Extension $469,040
from Bass Pro to Etiwanda (Service
for Lennar Housing Tract)
Total $469,040
■ Municipal Utility
E
JL Key: 1857
Church Street - Line Extension from Bass Pro Shop to Etiwanda Avenue
tProject location: — -.
Church Street from Bass Pro Shopr/A
to Etiwanda Avenue
BASE LINE RD/VICTORIA
Est.Construction Start/End: GARDENS PROJECT
07/2013 -09/2013 LOCATION/ IV
Protect Status: /
Design/Construction CHURCH ST
/VICTORIA/ 6A15 PRO /
Department: SHOP -
' Engineering GARDENS
Project Manager. / GARCIA
tFred Lyn VICTORIA
Description: Distribution Line Extension east of the 1-15 Freeway to service Lennar Housing Tract with electricity.
Justificartlon: Line extension is needed to extend power service to new residential construction.Once lines are extended,Rancho Cucamonga
Municipal Utility(RCMU) will also have accessibility to run lines down Etiwanda Avenue to service vacant parcels on the comer of
Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. The City paid SCE exit fees for the right to service vacant parcels never served by Edison;
these all fall under that category. The return on investment for the line extension cost will be around B years for this project;
RCMU believes this is a good turnaround period to pursue this project.
Project Cost Estimate($):
' Exoenciiture/Category Prior Years 2013/14 201411 2015/1 2016/17 2017/1 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design/Plan Review 50 $2,500 So $0 $0 $0 $2,500
Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 50 $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $456,540 $0 $0 50 $0 $456,540
' Inspection&Administration $0 $10,000 $0 So $0 $0 $10,000
Contingency $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $0 so
Total Costs: $0 5469,040 $0 $0 50 $0 $469,040
' Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 2013114 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 201711 TOTAL
' Municipal Utility(Fund 705) $0 $469,040 $0 $0 $0 $0 $469,040
Total Costs: $0 5469,040 $0 $0 $0 $0 $469,040
' Impact on Operations: The increased customer base will provide additional revenue to RCMU.
E-1
' i Olin=
9 ,
1
Parks
i
Any capital project that is located in, on, or
' adjacent to a park is classified as a Park Project. These include the
construction of new park facilities, as well as the expansion or rehabilitation of
existing park facilities. Improvements include playing fields, play ground equipment, park land-
scaping, other miscellaneous recreational amenities, restroom facilities and parking lot improvements.
Many of these projects require ongoing maintenance, and all field rehabilitation projects and renovations are performed
' on an annual or bi-annual basis due to extensive wear from local league play.
The majority of Park Projects are funded via the Park Development Fund, which is collected through park development
' fees, park improvements are also funded through grants and Special District funds.
t
Sources of Funding for FY 2013-14
' Project List & FY 2013-14 Expenditures
$36,100
I. Central Park- Hardscape& Landscape $25,000 $50,000
Improvements
2. Coyote Canyon Park-ADA&CPSC $150,000
Improvements
' 3. Etiwanda Creek Park-Sidewalk $25,000 $300,000
Improvements $283500
4. Legacy Park- Playground Seat Wall $20,000
S. LMD 4R- Lighting Retrofits (Milliken, $150,000
Mountain View, Ralph Lewis and West
Greenway Parks)
' 6. Rancho Summit Park- Restore Play $16,100
ground Rubber Surface
7. Southwest Cucamonna Park $283.500 ■ LMD 4R ❑ Prop 84 State Grant
' Total $669,600
■Park Development ❑ CFD 2002-03
F
' A Key: 1803
Central Park - Hardscape and Landscape Improvements
tProject Location: LJ —, =2
Central Park
11200 Base Line Road —'�P VP
DL ULI
LOCA ON
Est.Construction Start/End:
D
07/2013-10/2013
Project Status: JJ
Design/Construction �!; CEP A R KA L�� `; lU"J�
NT
Department:
' Community Services/Parks
D v(�
Project Manager: 1 /— ��.� F-11
Karen McGuire-Emery �ni n
Description: This project will modify hardscape and landscape at Central Park to accommodate the Pavilion Project.
Justification: This project is necessary to repair and replace improvements at Central Park.
' Project Cost Estimate($):
' Expenditure/Cateaory Prior Years 201314 201415 201516 201617 201718 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
' Design/Plan Review $0 $0 $0 $0 50 $0 $0
Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $75,000 $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000
'
Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $o $0
Contingency $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Costs: $75,000 $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 201314 201415 201516 201617 201718 TOTAL
Park Development(120) $75,000 $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000
Total Costs: $75,000 $25,000 $0 so $0 $0 $100,000
Impact on Operations: This project will require maintenance such as cleaning and replacing any damaged portions as needed.
1
1
' F-1
JL Key: 1859 '
Coyote Canyon Park - Playground ADA and CPSC Improvements
Project Location: 81
Coyote Canyon Park
10987 Terra Vista Parkway uE O(
N�T CENTRAL®
P A R K
SELINERD
Est Construction Start/End: DO
09/2013-11/2013
i
Project Status: CANYO
ON
ANVOrzwaw
OYOTE
Construction \ PARK E scEi oi"r C '
MTM
Department:
Community Services/Parks "I. N (� '
avvutE"rE
Project Manager: PROJECT LOCATION
Karen McGuire-Emery
Description: This project includes the installation of new playground equipment which complies with current Consumer Products Safety
Commission(CPSC)and Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA)Standards at Coyote Canyon Park. '
Justification: This project will improve accessibility and safety.
Project Cost Estimate ISI:
Expenditure/Cate¢ory Prior years 2013/1 2014115 2015/1 2016/17 2017/1 TOTAL '
Environmental/NPDES SO 50 $0 50 50 $0 $0
Design/Plan Review $0 50 $0 $0 $0 $o $0 ,
Right-of-Way $0 $0 $o $0 $0 So 5o
Construction $0 $150,000 50 50 $0 So $150,000
Inspection&Administration $0 5o $0 $0 50 50 So '
Contingency $0 $0 50 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Costs: $0 $150,1100 $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000 '
Project Funding:
Funding Sou Prior Years 2013/1 2014/1 2015/1 2016/1 2017118 TOTAL '
LMD 4R(Fund 134) $0 $150,000 SO $o $0 $0 $150,000
Total Costs: $o $150,000 $o $0 $0 So $150,000
Impact on Operations: This project reduces the amount of maintenance performed on playground equipment. '
1
F-2 '
' J L Key: 1861
Etiwanda Creek Park-Sidewalk Improvements
Project Location:
Etiwanda Creek Park 5939 l
' East Avenue
' PROJECT L CATION
Est.Construction Start/End:
' 7/2013-9/2014
TA EiM' P jD CREEK PMN
Project Status: �S.M a
Design
I 1
Department:
Community Services/Parks a
1
Project Manager: -
Karen McGuire-Emery nt 11 C� n
Description: This project involves the modification of existing sidewalks and provisions for new sidewalks to accommodate ADA standards.
' Justification: Currently,there is no sidewalk access to the north side of the soccer/football fields. In addition,the sidewalks and access points
in the dog park are not accessible from the parking lot.
Project Cost Estimate($I:
Expenditure/Cateeory Prior years 2013/1 2014/15 2015/16 2016117 2 17 18 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $0
' Design/Plan Review $0 $25,000 $0 50 50 $0 $25,000
Right-cf-Way $0 $o $0 So So $0 So
' Construction $o $0 $305,000 $0 $0 So $305,000
Inspection&Administration 50 $0 $20,000 50 $0 $0 $20,000
Contingency 50 $0 $0 so $0 50 $0
tTotal Costs: $0 $25,000 $325,000 $0 $0 $0 $350,000
Project Funding:
' Funding Source Prior years 2013/1 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 TOTAL
Park Development(120( $0 $25,000 5o $0 $0 $0 $25,000
Unknown So $0 $325,000 $0 $0 $o 5325,000
Total Costs: $0 $25,000 $325,000 $0 $0 $0 $350,000
' Impact on Operations: Completion of this project will allow access to the soccer/football fields,as well as the dog park area to comply
with ADA standards.
' F-3
A Ivey: '
Legacy Park - Playground Seat Wall
Project Loation: ,
Legacy Park
5858 Santa Ynez Place - WILSON
PROJECT
LOCATION Vii. •i
EWA ETIWANDA
Est.Construction Start/End: LE WE -&REEK PARK 2
08/2013-05/2014 ) SUttAMA�EMppITYOUN
�
NT JRHI6RATE �� j.J '
Project Status: I' 1 —•-^ --°- f
Requested FY 2013-2014 s
K
Department: w
Public Works Services / I =
J U
Project Manager: _ 1
Dean Rodia
Desnlptbn: Construe a seat wall around the playground.
Justification: Seat wall will confine sand within playground and prevent erosion from adjacent landscaping from entering the playground.
Project Cost Estimate($): '
Expenditure/Cateaory Prior Year 2013/1 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/1 TOTAL '
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design/Plan Review $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $0 t
Right-of-Way $0 $o $o $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $20,000
Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $0 So '
Contingency so $o $o $a $o $0 $0
Total Costs: $0 $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $20,000 1
Project Funding:
Fundina Source Prior Years 2013/1 2014/15 2015/1 201611 2017/1 TOTAL
CFD 2002-03 Park Maim(868) $0 $20,000 $o $0 $0 $0 $20,000
Total Costs: $0 $20,000 $o $0 $o $0 $20,000
Impact on Operations: Seat wall will decrease maintenance and the crews no longer need to replace lost sand or clean up erosion that '
entered playground area.
1
F-4 '
' 1L Key: 1858
LMD 4R - Lighting Retrofits at Various Parks
Project location:
Milliken Park,Mountain View Park,
Ralph M. Lewis Park and West '
Greenway Parkin LMD 4R.
1 ( �
I
Est.Construction Start/End:
' 08/2013-06/2014 l -
Project Status:
Requested FY 2013-2014
3CN.E:NONE
7
Department:
' Public Works Services PROJECT
LOCATION
Project Manager: _
' Dean Rodia
Description: Remove existing park lighting fixtures and replace with Spaulding inductive lighting fixtures
Justification: The existing park lighting fixtures are nearing the end of their service life. The new Spaulding inductive lighting fixtures use only
' one third the amount of electricity and have a longer service life while maintaining the same level of illumination.
Project Cost Estimate($):
' Expenditure/Categortory Prior Years 2013 14 2014115 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
' Design/Plan Review $0 $0 $0 so $0 $0 $0
Right-of-way $0 $o $o $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000
Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $0
Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $o
Total Costs: $0 $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $o $150,000
Project Funding:
' Funding Source Prior Years 201314 201415 201516 201617 201718 TOTAL
LID 411 Terra Vista(134) $0 $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 5150,000
Total Costs: $0 $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $o $150,000
Impact on Operations: The new inductive lighting fixtures with their longer service life and lower electricity usage will significantly reduce
the cost of park light maintenance in LMD 4R.
F-5
A Key:
Rancho Summit Park - Restore Playground Rubber Surface
Project Location:
Rancho Summit Park 5958
5oledad Way O - - WILSON AME. —CfIT
N.Tsa PROJECT 1 ,
LOCATIO NKE
-`WA ETIWANDA
E{E EN i V .-GREEK PARK e `% 4
OUN
Est.Construction Start/End: SUMMIT
NTER[��D1,ATE
08/2013-05/2014 JR^^'+^
I • i
NYAN 9T.
ZIA
Project Status: _-
Requested FY 2013-2014cc
~ '
W_
III
Department: -� U
Public Works Services ,
Project Manager: I I
Dean Rodia
Description: Extensive use has resulted in existing rubber surface being worn awaythroughout playground area. Pits and uneven surfaces have
resulted. This project will restore a uniform rubber surface.
Justification: Pits and uneven surfaces are hazards to playground users. Also,State playground codes require uniform rubber surface to meet
Americans With Disabilities Act(ADA)requirements. '
Project Cost Estimate IS):
Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2013/1 2014/15 2015/1 2016/17 2017118 TOTAL t
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design/Plan Review $0 $0 $0 $0 $o s0 $0 '
Right-of-Way $0 50 $0 $0 $0 $0 $o
Construction $0 $16,100 $0 $0 $0 $0 $16,100
Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 50 $0
Contingency $0 $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $0
Total Costs: $0 $16,100 So $0 $o $0 $16,100
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 201314 201415 201516 201617 201718 TOTAL t
CFD 2002-03 Park Maint(868) $0 $16,100 $0 s0 $0 $0 $16,100
Total Costs: $0 $16,100 SO $0 $0 $0 $16,100
Impact on Operations: Uniform rubber surface for playground will result in less maintenance. Temporary repairs will no longer be '
needed.
F-6 '
' JL Key: 1754
Southwest Cucamonga Park- New Park
1 Project location:
East side of Madrone Avenue a
between Arrow Route and 9th
Street .8.
s's nn
Est.Construction Start/End: DB rl U1 1�
03/2014-12/2014 IUl U
Project Status: �oo PRO ECT OCATION
Preliminary Grant Awarded
11/1/2010
Full Grant Expenditure on Hold
Pending Property Transfer From >
w
' RDA � O
Department: LJ LJ� CTy
' Community Services Y�RD L.J
CITY LIMITS
Project Manager.
' Karen McGuire-Emery
Description: The City was awarded $3,941,136 to design and construct a 3.4 acre neighborhood park for the local residents in Southwest
Cucamonga.
Justification: No other neighborhood park within a 1/2 mile radius. Park will serve low Income neighborhood.
Project Cost Estimate($):
' Expenditure/Category Prior Years 11111/14 2014 15 2015/1 2016/17 2017 16 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $2.282.00 So $0 $0 so $0 $2,282
Design/Grant Prep $67,772.00 $283,500 $0 so $0 50 $351,272
' Site Remediation $40,000.00 $0 $0 $0 50 5o $40,000
Construction $0.00 $o $3469,910 50 50 $0 $3,469,910
'
Inspection&Administration $0.00 $o $165,180 $0 $0 $0 5165,180
Contingency $0.00 $0 $0 $o $0 $0 Sc)
Total Costs: $110,054 $283,500 $3,635,090 $0 $0 $0 $4,028,644
' Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Year 2013/14 2014115 2015 16 2016/17 2017118 TOTAL
' Park Development(120) $47,500 so So $0 $0 $0 $47,500
Prop 114 State Grant(235) $22,554 $283,500 $3,635,090 $0 $0 $0 $3,941,144
Rops Funding S40,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $40,000
' Total Costs: $110,054 $283,500 $3,635,090 $0 $0 $0 $4,028,644
Impact on Operations: This project will provide a new neighborhood park and will require park maintenance such as mowing,cleaning of
bathrooms,as well as maintenance of all other amenities and landscape irrigation. It will increase operational and
maintenance costs by about$60,000 per year.
' F-7
tTA. ..
Railroad Crossings
Railroad Crossings are extremely expensive and
' infrequent projects, requiring large funding commitments, lengthy
construction schedules and inevitably causing some inconvenience to the local
community during the construction period. They are, however, also one of the best ways to
' ensure the safety of drivers, pedestrians and rail users by providing two separate crossings, thereby minimizing the possi-
bility of train versus automobile, or train versus pedestrian accidents.
' Railroad Crossings are identified in the City's General Plan document, and they are also frequently illustrated in regional
planning documents held by the County of San Bernardino, SANBAG and Caltrans.
' Sources of Funding for FY 2013-14
$25.000
' Project List & FY 2013-14 Expenditures
I. 6th Street @ BNSF Spur- Improve $25,000
' Grade Crossing
Total $25,000
' ■Transportation
G
' JL Key: 1839
6th Street at BNSF Spur- Improve at Grade Crossing
' Project Location:
Intersection of Etiwanda and ftp
Whiltram Avenues. ILI AA KION OA RONTANA
a
ARROW ROUTE
' Est.Construction Start/End: WHITT M AVE.
10/2015-06/2016 SCALE'NONE
' METROLINK RAILROAD
Project Status:
' Design
6TH ST
Department:
' Engineering PROJECT
LOCATION
Project Manager:
Curt Billings
Description: Prepare preliminary design drawings and cost estimates for an at grade crossing on 6th Street at the BNSF Railroad Spur.
JustiRcation: This project will complete 6th Street,between Santa Anka Avenue and Etiwanda Avenue,
Project Cost Estimate(S):
' Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2013114 2014 15 201S/1 2016117 2017 18 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $o 50
' Design/Plan Review $0 $25,000 $0 $0 $o $0 $25,000
Right-of-Way $0 $o $0 $o $0 $0 $0
' Construction $0 $D $0 $350,000 $0 $0 $350,000
Inspection&Administration $0 $o $0 $50,000 $0 $0 $50,000
Contingency $0 $0 $0 $40,000 $0 $0 $40,000
Total Costs: $0 $25,000 $0 $440,000 $0 $0 $465,000
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 2013/1 2014/1 2015/1 2016117 2017/1 TOTAL
Transportation Fund(124) $0 $25,000 $0 5440,000 $0 50 $465,000
Total Costs: $0 $25,000 50 5440,000 $0 50 5465,000
Impact on Operations: None.
G-1
ems.
� ._� ,,esu �� _,; : r•� �_',�.
� 0.„t:....
Streets
' Streets projects are the most common type of projects undertaken
by the City. The City receives annual funding from Measure I and gasoline sales
' taxes for use on resurfacing projects for local arterial and residential streets in order to extend pavement
life and improve driving conditions. Besides street rehabilitation projects, the City also undertakes many widening
and extension projects as need dictates via new development, community needs and the City's General Plan.
' Project List& FY 2013-14 Expenditures Project List& FY 2013-14 Expenditures
I. 4th St-Archibald to Haven North Side- $20,000
Pavement Rehab 21. Hermosa Ave from Main to $203,000
' Arrow-Pavement Rehab
2. 4th St, Milliken to Richmond, North $206,000 22. Lemon Ave Archibald to Haven- $500
Side-Pavement Rehab
Pavement Rehab
3. 6th St, Hermosa to Haven-Pavement $15,000
Rehab 23. Local Streets- Pavement Rehab $1,792,770
4. 8th St, Baker to Hellman-Pavement24. Madrone Ave,north of 9th Sc- $500
Rehab $15,000 Widening
' S. 9th St.Railroad Spur to Hellman and $303,600 25. Rochester Ave, Foothill Blvd to $500
Baker,8th to 9th-Sidewalk Base Line Rd-Pavement Rehab
6. 9th St, North Side from 100' west to $118,300 26. Victoria St, Etiwanda to E.City $50,000
800'west of Vineyard-Sidewalk Limits-Widening&Pavement
' 7. 19th St,from West City Limit to $500 27. Youngs Canyon, Koch PI,to $50,000
Haven -Pavement Rehab Cherry Ave-Street Extension
' 8. Archibald Ave,4th to Foothill- $50,000 Total $46,221,330
Pavement Rehab
9. Archibald Ave, Hillside to North City $500 Sources of Funding for FY 2013-14
Limit-Pavement Rehab $324.400 $71760
10.Banyan St-Merlot to Cantabria-Side- $tst7.5oo $47,000 gso,o0o
ya $66,000 $2,290,670
walk north side
11. Baseline Ave at I-15 Interchange $43,000,000 $3,000,000
t 12. Beryl St,Baseline to 19th-Sidewalk $127,000
west side $3,340.000
13.Carnelian St,Lemon to Wilson- $500
Pavement Rehab
14. Etiwanda Ave @ Whitman-Widen $10,000 $4,000.000
intersection& Install Traffic Signal
' 15.Etiwanda Ave,6th to Arrow- $50,0000
50 0003[400.000
Street Widening
16.Foothill Blvd,Vineyard to Archibald- $15.000
Pavement Rehab
■Tax Allocation Bonds SAFETEA-LU(Federal)
17. Haven Ave, Banyan to Wilson- $1 10.660
Sidewalk east side .Transportation ® IMD(Federal)
'
18. Haven Ave,Wilson to N.City Limits- $15,000
Pavement Rehab Gas Tax RT7360 ■ Citywide Infrastructure
19. Hellman Ave, Baseline to 19th- $500
Pavement Rehab
' Safe Route to Schools . Measure I
20.Hermosa Ave,Banyan to Wilson- $500
Pavement Rehab ®Proposition 42 - AD 88.2
H
1
t1L Key: 1853
4th Street from Archibald Avenue to Haven Avenue - North Side Pavement Rehabilitation
' Project Location:
4th Street from Archibald Avenue
' to Haven Avenue
W Iy1
Q
Z
( V
Est.Construction Start/End: Q U
08/2015-10/2015 U) O Zr)
Project Status: 4TH ST.
il ! F=////
' Design "' �L
�j
Department: BOUDARY LINE PROJECT LOCATION
Engineering CITY OF ONTARIO
Project Manager:
Romeo David
Description: This project involves cold planing,localized asphalt removal and replacement,crack sealing,asphalt rubber hot mix overlay,traffic
' signal loop replacement,utility valves and manhole adjustments,and pavement striping.
Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition,extending pavement life,use,and rideability. In
' addition,the project is using asphah rubber and is therefore eligible for a CalRecycle 3 rebate.
Project Cost Estimate(S):
' Expenditure/Catecory Prior Year 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016/1 2017/1 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 50 $0 $0 $0
Design/Plan Review So $20,000 $500 $o $0 $0 $20,500
Right-of-Way So $0 $0 $o 50 $o $o
Construction $0 $0 $0 $272,000 $0 $o $272,000
Inspection&Administration So $o $0 $6,000 $o $0 $6,000
Contingency $0 $0 $0 $27,000 $0 $0 $27,000
' Total Costs: $0 $20,000 $500 $305,000 $0 $0 $325,500
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 2013/1 2014/15 2015116 2016117 201711 TOTAL
Measure I Fund(176) $0 $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000
Measure I Fund(177) $0 $101000 SSW $305,000 $o $0 $315,500
' Total Costs: $0 $20,000 $500 $305,000 $0 $0 $325,500
Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance like pothole repairs,weed abatement and crack seal,thus freeing up maintenance crews
' to attend to other needed areas.
H-1
A Key: 1817 '
4th Street from Milliken Avenue to Richmond Place - North Side Pavement Rehabilitation
Project Location: '
JERSEY BLVD
4th Street From Milliken Avenue to
Richmond Place
- 1
i
Est.Construction Start/End: 6TH ST
08/2013-09/2013 --
> J u '
< a
a
0
Project Status: z�
i
Design
LL
g a LL
4TH$T m
Department: --- -- _— - -- -
Engineering '
Project Manager: PROJECT LOCATION
Romeo David
Description: This project involves cold planing,localized asphalt removal and replacement,crack sealing,asphalt rubber hot mix overlay,traffic
signal loop replacement,utility valves and manhole adjustments,and pavement striping.
1
lurtlflcatlon: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition,extending pavement life,use,and rideability.
Project Cost Estimate($): '
Expenditure/Category Prior years 2013/14 2014/15 2015/1 2016/17 2017/1 TOTAL '
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 so $0 $0 $0
Design/Plan Review $o $6,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,000
Right-of-Way $0 $0 50 $o $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $170,000 $0 So 50 $0 $170,000
Inspection&Administration $0 $11,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $11,000 '
Contingency $0 $17,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $17,000
Total Costs: $o $206,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $206,000
Project Funding: '
Funding Source Prior years 2013/14 2014115 2015 16 2016/17 201711 TOTAI
Gas Tax RT7360 Fund(174) $0 $206,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $206,000
Total Costs: $0 $206,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $206,000
Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance like pothole repairs,weed abatement and crack seal,thus freeing up maintenance crews '
to attend to other needed areas.
H-2 t
' JL Key: 1849
6th Street from Hermosa Avenue to Haven Avenue- Pavement Rehabilitation
' Project Location:
6th' Streetfrom Hermosa Avenue W to Haven
AvenueQLi Q 7TH ST
Q W W
W'
O Z Q Z U j
Est.Construction Start/End: 2 _
' 08/2014-10/2014
Project status: 61-H ST.
' Design PR JECT LOC TION
V >
Department: V Q
' Engineering � 0
Project Manager:
Romeo David
Description: This project involves cold planing,localized asphalt removal and replacement,crack sealing,asphalt rubber hot mix overlay,traffic
' signal loop replacement,utility valves and manhole adjustments,and pavement striping.
Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition,extending pavement life,use,and rideability. In
' addition,the project is using asphalt rubber and is therefore eligible for a CalRecycle 2 rebate.
Project Cost Estimate 13j:
' Expenditure/Category Prior years 2013/24 2014/1 2015/1 2016/17 2017/1 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES 50 $0 $0 $0 s0 $0 $0
' Design/Plan Review $0 $15,000 $0 $0 $o $0 $15,000
Right-of-Way $0 $0 $o $o 5o so $0
Construction $0 $0 $267,500 $0 $0 50 $267,500
' Inspection&Administration SO $0 $6,000 50 $0 $0 $6,000
Contingency $0 50 $26,500 $0 $0 $0 $26,500
Total Costs: $0 $15,000 $300,000 $0 50 50 $315,000
Project Funding:
' Funding Source Prior years 201314 201415 201516 201617 201718 TOTAL
Gas Tax R&T 7360 Fund(174) $0 $15,000 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $315,000
Total Costs: $0 $15,000 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $315,000
Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance like pothole repairs,weed abatement and crack seal,thus freeing up maintenance crews
to attend to other needed areas.
1
' H-3
JL Key: 1851 '
8th Street from Baker Avenue to Hellman Avenue - Pavement Rehabilitation
Protectn:
8th Street,et, from Baker Avenue to
Hellman Avenue I '
I u ARROW RTE. A
a LLJJ LLL _�JJJ
Ui
Q
Est Construction Start/End: 0
08/2014-10/2014 0 9TH ST. sW
s t
Project Status: r
Design �_ O CITY u
6TH ST. YARD t
Department:
Engineering '
PROJECT LOCATION
Project Manager: BOUDARY LINE
Romeo David CITY OF ONTARIO
1
Description: This project involves cold planing,localized asphalt removal and replacement,crack sealing,asphalt rubber hot mix overlay,traffic
signal loop replacement,utility valves and manhole adjustments,and pavement striping.
Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition,extending pavement life,use,and rideability. In '
addition,the project is using asphalt rubber and is therefore eligible for a CalRecycle 2 rebate.
1
Project Cost Estimate($J:
Expenditure/Category Prior years 2013/14 2024/15 201511 2016/17 2017 18 TOTAL '
Environmental/NPDES 50 $0 5o 5o $0 $o $o
Design/Plan Review 50 $15,000 $0 So $0 $0 $15,000 '
Right-of-Way $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $0 $o
Construction SO $0 $267,500 $D $0 $0 $267,SW
Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $6,000 So $0 $0 $6,000 ,
Contingency $0 $0 $26,500 $0 $0 $0 526,500
Total Costs: $0 $15,000 $30D,000 $0 $0 $0 $315,000
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 201314 201415 2015116 201617 201718 TOTAL '
Gas Tax R&T 7360 Fund(174) $0 $15,000 $300,000 $0 so 50 $315,000
Total Costs: 50 $15,000 $300,000 $0 $0 50 $315,000
Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance like pothole repairs,weed abatement and crack seal,thus freeing up maintenance crews i
to attend to other needed areas.
H-4 ,
' JL Key: 1856
9th Street from Railroad Spur to Hellman Avenue and Baker Avenue from 8th Street to 9th Street
' Sidewalk Improvements
Project Location: „Y
' 9th Street,from spur to Hellman L11
Avenue and Baker Avenue,from r
8th street to 9th Street. Q ARROW RTE. nRFqRx C
z
' Est.Construction Start/End: LU
J
05/2014-06/2014 m =
9TH ST.
' Project Status:
Design and Construction C
' Department: PROJECT LOC - N CITY
Engineering
8TH ST. YARD
' Project Manager: F
Romeo David
' Description: This project will install 1,750 feet of sidewalk to close a gap between two existing sections of sidewalk.
' Justification: This project was requested by the Cucamonga School District.The improvements will improve pedestrian circulation,as well as
bringing the area into ADA compliance.
' Project Cost Estimate($):
Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2013/1 2014/15 201511 2016/17 2017/18 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $o
Design/Plan Review $0 515,000 $0 so $0 $0 $15,000
Right-of-Way s0 $0 $0 s0 $0 s0 s0
' Construction $0 $250,000 s0 $0 s0 s0 $250,0011
Inspection&Administration s0 $13,600 s0 $0 $0 $0 $13,600
Contingency $0 $25,000 s0 $0 $0 s0 $25,000
Total Costs: so $303,600 $0 $0 $0 $0 S303,W0
' Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 2013/14 2014/15 2015/1 2016/1 2017/1 TOTAL
Citywide Infrastructure Fund(198) $0 $70,000 s0 $0 $0 $0 $70,000
' Safe Routes to School Program(234) $0 $233,600 so s0 s0 $0 $233,600
Total Costs: s0 $303,600 so so s0 $0 $303,600
Impact on Operations: This project will reduce maintenance and weed abatement costs from General Fund and LMD 38.
1
' H-5
A Key: 1808 t
9th Street North Side from 100 feet West to 800 feet West of Vineyard Avenue - Sidewalk
Improvements
Protect location: / w W5 '
9th Street,north side,from 100 4
YARROW ROUTE o: < ARROW ROUTE
feet west of vineyard Avenue to — --
x gg w
800 feet west of Vineyard Avenue ARROW ROUTE Z I g Q
9TH ST _ i 9TH ST
O ._.,.. C -— m
Est-Comtructlon Start/End:
12/2012-01/2013 8TH ST 8 TH ST -
PROJECT a
LOCATION
Project status:
Design and Construction --
a STH ST
ONN O
Department: m '
Engineering
1 a
Project Manager: N.T.S. 4TH ST '
Curt Billings _
Description: Project to construct 700 feet of sidewalk an the north side of 9th Street. t
Justification: To provide students a safe and direct route walking to school.The poject goal is to reduce the need for bus services and its
benefits are measured by student surveys taken before and after the project. The City was awarded a Federal Safe Routes To
School grant to fund 75%of the construction costs.Funding becomes available in FY 2013/2014,beginning October 1,2013
1
Project Cost Estimate($):
Expenditure/Category Prior years 2013/1 2014115 2015/16 2016/1 2017/1 TOTAL '
EnvironmentaVNPDES $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $0
Design/Plan Review $5,760 So $0 50 $0 So $5,760 ,
Right-of-Way $0 $0 $o $0 $o $0 SO
Construction $0 $105,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $105,500
Inspection&Administration $0 $2,300 $o $0 $0 $0 $2,300
Contingency $0 $10,500 so $0 $0 $0 $10,500
Total Costs: $5,760 $118,300 $0 $0 $0 $0 $124,060 '
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Year 2013 14 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/1 TOTAL '
Citywide Infrastructure(198) $5,760 $27,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $33,260
Safe Route School Fund(234) $0 $90,800 $o $0 $o $0 $9000
Total Costs: $5,760 $118,300 50 $0 $0 $0 $124.060 '
Impact on Operations: Reduction in parkway maintenance costs.
H-6 ,
' It Key: 1836
19th Street from West City Limit to Haven Avenue- Pavement Rehabilitation
Project Location:
19th Street, from the west city
' limit to Haven Avenue
1 �o� tJL��1J 1(JiJ�S Vo��!���u[��JIJ�' -�
Est Construction Start/End: -- '
' 08/2014-10/2014 i 19THST O—I C
_ —
Project Status: L w
Design Q y 7 �
Department:
' Engineering
Project Manager:
' Romeo David
Description: This project involves cold planing,localized asphalt removal and replacement,crack sealing,asphalt rubber hot mix overlay,traffic
' signal loop replacement,utility valves and manhole adjustments,and pavement striping.
Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition,extending pavement life,use,and rideability. In
' addition,the project is using asphalt rubber and is therefore eligible for a Calltecycle 2 rebate.
Project Cost Estimate(SI
' Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 201611 2017/1 TOTAL
Envlronmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 50
Design/Plan Review $49,000 $500 $o $0 $0 $0 $49,500
' Right-of-Way So $o So So $o $0 50
Construction 50 50 $1,225,000 $o $0 $o $1,225,000
' Inspection&Administration $0 So $27,500 $0 $0 50 527,500
Contingency $0 $0 $122,500 $o $o $0 $122,500
Total Costs: $49,000 $500 $1,375,000 So So $0 $1,424,500
Project Funding:
' Funding Source Prior Years 2013/1 2014/15 2015/1 2016/17 2017/18 TOTAL
Measure I Fund(177) $49,000 $S00 $1,375,000 $0 $0 $0 51,424,500
Total Costs: $49,000 $500 $1,375,000 50 So $0 $1,424,500
' impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance like pothole repairs,weed abatement and crack seal,thus freeing up maintenance crews
to attend to other needed areas.
' H-7
JL Key 1852
Archibald Avenue from 4th Street to Foothill Boulevard - Pavement Rehabilitation
Project Location: JI s,
Archibald Avenue,from 4th Street
to Foothill
to Foothill Boulevard "JJOu��u�"I� IIJn(JnLJI
ARROWRIE-
PR CTL T1014 '
Y 9T,
Est.Construction Start/End: _
08/2015—10/2015 inn UU 9 B
E '
Project Status:
s
Design
—flJl Ore,ST,
Department:
Engineering
t
Project Manager:
�rR car.
Romeo David ,
Description: This project involves cold planing,localized asphalt removal and replacement,crack sealing,asphalt rubber hot mix overlay,traffic
signal loop replacement,utility valves and manhole adjustments,and pavement striping. '
Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition,extending pavement life,use,and rideability. In
addition,the project is using asphalt rubber and is therefore eligible for a CalRecycle 3 rebate.
Project Cost Estimate(5):
Expenditure/Category Prior years 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 TOTAL '
Environmental/NPDES $0 $o $0 $p $0 $0 $0
Design/Plan Review $0 $50,000 $500 $0 $0 $0 $501500 '
Right-of-Way s0 $0 $0 $0 $p $o $0
Construction $0 $0 $0 $1,070,000 $0 $o $1,070,000
Inspection&Administration $0 $0 50 $24,000 $0 $0 $24,000 '
Contingency $D $0 $0 $107,000 $0 $o $107,000
Total Costs: $o $50,000 $500 $1,201,000 $0 $o $1,251,500
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior years 2013114 2014115 201511 2016117 2017/1 TOTAL ,
Measure I Fund(176) $o $501000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,000
Measure I Fund(177) $0 $0 $500 $1,201,000 $0 $0 $1,201,500
Total Costs: $0 $50,000 $500 $1,201,000 $0 $0 $1,251,500 '
Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance like pothole repairs,weed abatement and crack seal,thus freeing up maintenance crews
to attend to other needed areas. ,
1
H-8 '
' IL Key. 1727
Archibald Avenue from Hillside Road to North City Limit - Pavement Rehabilitation
Project Location:
Archibald Avenue,from Hillside
Road to North City Limit
PROJECT LOCATION
CITY LIMIT
Est.Construction Start/End: - - - -
__ - - — - - w
08/2015-10/2015
e 0 —
Project Status: -' - - tc w
Design -- - _
- - _- _HILLSIDE RD -
Department - - -- -- _ ---_ - -
w
' Engineering
ZWILSON AVE-
Project tManage
Rom
8omeo David — - - --__
Description: This project involves cold planing,localized asphalt removal and replacement,crack sealing,asphalt rubber hot mix overlay,traffic
signal loop replacement,utility valves and manhole adjustments,and pavement striping.
Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition,extending pavement life,use,and rideability. In
' addition,the project is using asphalt rubber and is therefore eligible for a CalRecycle 3 rebate.
Project Cost Estimate
Expenditure/Cate¢ory Prior Years 2013/14 2014/15 2015/1 2016117 2017/18 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
' Design/Plan Review $16,720 $500 $500 $0 $0 $0 $17,720
Right-of-Way $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $0 $0 $490,000 $0 $0 $490,000
Inspection&Administration $0 $0 So $11,000 $0 $0 $11,000
Contingency $0 $0 50 $49,000 $0 $0 $49,000
Total Costs: $16,720 $500 $500 $5501000 $0 $0 $567,720
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 201314 201415 201516 201617 201718 TOTAL
Measure I Fund(177) $550,000 $500 $500 $550,000 $0 $0 $1,101,000
Total Costs: $550,000 $500 $500 $550,000 $0 $0 $1,101,000
Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance like pothole repairs,weed abatement and crock seal,thus freeing up maintenance crews
to attend to other needed areas.
' H-9
JL Key: 1862 '
Banyan Street from Merlot Court to Cantabria Avenue-Sidewalk North Side
Project Location:
North side of Banyan Street.from
Merlot Court to East of Cantabria HILLSIDE RD _
Avenue.
WILSON AVE
Est.Construction Start/End:
Unknown , - '
BANYAN ST
Project Status:
Design
Department: - - -- - -
Engineering
P ROJECT LOCATION-
Project Manager: /-- -
Curt Billings
Description: This proposed sidewalk project along the north side of Banyan Street will fill a gap where sidewalks are missing and provide
improved AOA access to Banyan Elementary School and Los Osos High School.
Justification: This project is part of the City Master Plan.The improvements will improve pedestrian circulation as well as bring the area into t
ADA compliance.
Project Cost Estimate($): ,
Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2013/14 201411 2015/16 201611 2017/1 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 '
Design/Plan Review $0 $7,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,500
Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $50,000 So $0 $0 $0 $50100(1
Inspection&Administration $0 $8,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,500
Contingency $o 5o $0 $D $0 $0 $0 '
Total Costs: $0 $66,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $66,000
Project Funding: '
Funding Source Prior Years 2013/14 2014/15 2015/1 2016/17 2017118 TOTAL
Gas Tax RT 7360(174) $0 $66,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $66,000
Total Costs: $(1 $66,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $66,D00
Impact on Operations: Reduction in parkway maintenance costs. '
H-10 '
Base Line Road- at 1-15 Interchange 1L Key: 1361
Project Location: E 0
Base Line Road at the 1-15 Freeway
WN
R
Est.Construction Start/End:
12/2013-12/2015 `
' Project Status: a
Design P OJ CT LOC TION
3
C
i
Department: m �
Engineering
Project Manager: 322TWILL 18L'
Walt Stickney 6 6
' Description: Construction of a modification to the on and off ramps for the I-15 Freeway at Base Line Road.
Justification: Due to the current and projected congestion of the streets around the interchange,it is necessary to Improve access to and from
the 1-15 freeway at Base Line Road. Up to 50 percent of the project costs are eligible for reimbursement through Federal funds.
' Project Cost Estimate($):
Expenditure/CateRory Prior Years 2013/1 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/1 TOTAL
Environmental/NPOES $1,065,033 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,065,033
Design/Plan Review $4,576,400 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,576,400
' Right-of-Way $6,396,387 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,396,387
Construction $0 $35,000.000 $200,000 $D $0 $0 $35,200,000
'Oft Costs $0 $7.000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7.000,0OD
Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Costs: $12,037,820 $43,000,000 $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $55,237,820
Project Funding:
' Funding Source Prior Year 2013/1 2014/15 2015116 2016/17 2017/18 TO7AL
' Transportation(124) $898,571 $3,250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,148,571
RDA(660) $11,116,482 $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $11,116,482
Tax Allocation Bonds $31,400,000 50 $0 $0 $0 $31,400,000
City Infrastructure(198) $1,350,000 $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,550,000
General Fund(001) $18,996 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $18,996
RDA(650) $3,771 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,771
Subtotal qty Budget Costs: $12,037,820 $36,000,000 $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $48,237,820
IMD(Federal) $0 $3,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,000,000
SAFETEA-LU(Federal) $0 $4,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,000,000
Subtotal Other costs: $0 $7,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,000,000
Grand Total Costs: $12,037,820 $43,000,000 $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $55,237,820
' Impact on Operations: City is expected to take over maintenance of the landscaping within the interchange. Area of landscaping has not
yet been determined.
H-11
JL Key: 1863 ,
Beryl Street from Base Line Road to 19th -Sidewalk West Side
Project Location: r
Seryl Street,Base Line Road to _ .J U(�LJ}I 19TH ST "-- -`,
19th Street - ----1 L �U I- — --
(k
PR J E
� UL
�Tl Qrt
l' � fv
�J �
Est.Construction Start/End. —� pJ
Unknown
I LU
Project Status:
Design -
Department: - I - ��
Engineering
BASE LINE k)3J
Project Manager.
Romeo David '
Description: This project will install a sidewalk to close a gap between existing sections of sidewalks on the west side of Beryl Street.
1
Justification: This project is part of the City Master Plan.The improvements will improve pedestrian circulation as well as bring the area into
ADA compliance.
1
Project Cost Estimate($):
Expenditure/Category Prior years 2013/1 2014/15 2015/1 2016/17 2017/1 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design/Plan Review $0 $15,000 $0 s0 $0 $0 $15,000 r
Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $85,000 $o $o $o $0 $85,000
Inspection&Administration $0 $18,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $18,500 ,
Contingency $0 $8,500 s0 $0 $0 $0 $8,500
Total Costs: $0 $127,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $127,000 r
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior years 201314 201415 201516 201617 201718 TOTAL '
Gas Tax RT7360(174) $0 $127,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $127,000
Total Costs: $0 $127,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $127,000
Impact on Operations: Reduction in parkway maintenance costs. r
1
r
H-12 r
' A Key: 1722
Carnelian Street from Lemon Avenue to Wilson Avenue - Pavement Rehabilitation
' Project location: ELI (�
Carnelian Street,Lemon Avenue to � IL
' Wilson Avenue
�Xi
PR JECT LOC
Est.Construction Start/End:
' 08/2015-10/2015
ALTA LOMA
Project Status: JR. HIGH
Design
Department:
' Engineering
PARKRYL EAPARKrIIL
Project Manager: t
Romeo David — 0 Q
Description: This project involves cold planing,localized asphalt removal and replacement,crack sealing,asphalt rubber hot mix overlay,traffic
signal loop replacement,utility valves and manhole adjustments,and pavement striping.
Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition,extending pavement life,use,and rideability. In
' addition,the project is using asphalt rubber and is therefore eligible for a CalRecycle 3 rebate.
Project Cost Estimate($):
' ExpenditureExO�ryendlture/Categoory Prior Years 2013/14 2014/15 2015/1 2016/17 2027/1 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 50 $0 $0 $0 $o
Design/Plan Review $10,000 $500 $500 5o $0 $0 $11,000
Right-of-way so $0 So $o $0 $o $o
Construction $0 $0 $0 $445,500 $0 $0 $445,500
' Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $0 $10,000 $0 $0 $10,000
Contingency $0 50 $0 $44,500 $0 $0 $44,500
Total Costs: $10,000 $500 $500 $500,000 50 $0 $511,000
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016Z1 2017/1 TOTAL
Measure l Fund(177) 510,000 $500 $500 5500,000 $0 $0 $511,000
Total Costs: $10,000 $500 $500 $500,000 $0 so 5511,000
Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance like pothole repairs,weed abatement and crack seal,thus freeing up maintenance crews
to attend other needed areas.
1
' H-13
JL Key 1840
Etiwanda Avenue at Whittram Avenue- Widen Intersection and Install a Traffic Signal
Project location: I '
Intersection of Etiwanda and / I FONTANA
Whittram Avenue. AODLT < 1
OMPLE Q
ARROW ROUTE
WHITTRAM AVE.
Est.Construction Start/End: — — I scue NONe
06/2016-06/2016 RAILROAD _
Project Status:
Design
6TH ST U
Department:
Engineering
P�20JECT '
Project Manager: L CATION
Curt Billings
Description: Prepare preliminary design drawings for widening the intersection of Etiwanda Avenue and Whittram Avenue and the installation
of a traffic signal.
Justification: This project will widen the intersection of Etlwanda Avenue and Whittram Avenue and install a traffic signal to improv:safety and
traffic circulation at the intersection.The project will be constructed concurrently with the Etiwanda Avenue storm drain and '
widening project from 6th Street to Arrow Route,
Project Cost Estimate ISI: ,
Expenditure/Cateaory Prior Years 2013/1 2014/15 2015/1 201611 2017/1 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $5,000
Design/Plan Review so S10,00D $0 $0 $0 $0 510,000 '
Right-Of-Way $0 $0 $75,000 $0 $0 $0 $75,000
Construction $0 so $0 $350,000 $0 s0 $350,000
Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $0 $40,000 $0 $0 $40,000
Contingency $0 $0 so $40,000 so $0 $40,000
Total Costs: $0 530,000 $801000 $430,000 $0 $0 $520,000
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Year 2013/14 2 14 2015/1 201617 201718 TOTAI
Transportation Fund(124) $0 $10.000 $80,000 5430,000 $0 50 $520,000
Total Costs: $0 $10,000 $80,000 $430.000 $0 $0 $520,000
Impact on Operations: Increased cost for signal operation and maintenance.
1
H-14
' IL Key: 1076
Etiwanda Avenue from 6th Street to Arrow Route - Street Widening
' Project Location:
Etiwanda Avenue from 6th Street RANCHO FONTANA
- CUCAMONGA
' to Arrow Route
ARROW ROUTE ��
Est.Construction Start/End: WHIT_TR 'M AVE. SCALE:NONE
10/2015-06/2016 RAILROAD _ _
7
Project Status:
Design
6TH ST
Department: - -- -
Engineering
PROJECT
Project Manager: LOCATION
Curt Billings
Description: Prepare preliminary design drawings for the widening of Etiwanda Avenue from 6th Street to Arrow Route.This project will also
install a storm drain along Etiwanda Avenue.
lustificatlon: This project will improve safety,drainage and traffic circulation on Etiwanda Avenue from 6th Street to Arrow Route.The project
will be constructed concurrently with intersecton and signal installation at Whittram Avenue and Etiwanda Avenue.
Project Cost Estimate($):
Expenditure/Cateeory Prior Years 2013/1 2014/15 2015/16 2016117 2017/18 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 S0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design/Plan Review $63,000 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $113,000
Right-of-Way 00 $0 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $50,000
Construction $0 $0 $0 $1,850,000 SO $0 $1,850,000
Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $0 $0 $50,000
Contingency $0 $0 $0 $200,000 $0 $0 $200,000
Total Costs: $63,000 $50,000 $50,000 $2,100,000 $0 $0 $2,263,000
Project Funding:
Funding Prior Years 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 201711 TOTAL
Transportation Fund(124) $63,000 $25,000 $50,000 51,100,000 $0 $0 $1,238,000
Infrastructure Fund(198) $0 $25,000 $0 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $110251000
Total Costs: $63,000 $50,000 $50,000 $2,100,000 $0 $0 $2,263,000
Impact on Operations: Reduction in street maintenance and repair costs.
' H-15
JL Key: 1855
Foothill Boulevard from Vineyard to Archibald - Pavement Rehabilitation
Project Location: '
Foothill Boulevard,from Vineyard
Avenue to Archibald Avenue I \•\ ti, i �L_1„��( � RD
r�/�J l.�L�IkCd1�Rr'Ytrtu �uJIJ
�r > FO HILL
¢ [BLVD '
Est.Construction Start/End: 6 6
08/2015-10/2015 r
ESQ I III\
Project Status: W
Design Survey >
PR T ION
Department: I I II
Engineering
Project Manager:
Romeo David
Description: This project involves cold planing,localized asphalt removal and replacement,crack sealing,asphalt rubber hot mix overlay,traffic
signal loop replacement,utility valves and manhole adjustments,and pavement striping.
Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition,extending pavement life,use,and rideability. In ,
addition,the project is using asphalt rubber and is therefore eligible for a CalRecycle 3 rebate.
Project Cost Estimate($): 1
Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2013/14 2014/15 2015/1 2016/17 2017/18 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design/Plan Review $0 $15,000 $500 $0 $0 $0 $15,500
Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $0 $0 $715,000 $0 $a $715,000
Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $0 $16,000 $0 $0 $16,000 '
Contingency $0 $0 $0 $71,000 $0 $0 $71,000
Total Costs: $0 $15,000 $500 $802,000 $0 $0 $817,500
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 2013/1 2014/1S 2015/1 2016/17 2017/18 TOTAL ,
Measure 1 Fund(176) $0 $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,000
Measure I Fund(177) $0 $0 $500 $802,000 $0 $0 $802,500
Total Costs: $0 $15,000 $500 $802,000 $0 $0 $817,500
Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance like pothole repairs,weed abatement and crack seal,thus freeing up maintenance crews
to attend to other needed areas.
H-16 ,
' JLKey', 1864
Haven Avenue from Banyan to Wilson - Sidewalk East Side
' Project Location:
East Side of Haven Avenue.from ._�.
Banyan Street to Wilson Avenue —' HILLSIDE RD _.j
WILSON AVE
Est.Construction Start/End: w _
' Unknown 0 _ —— _— ----
i BANYAN ST
Project Status:
Design
Department:
Engineering
OJECT LOCATION
Project Manager. --- - ✓ _ r""`r
Curt Billings - 1 J - U
r
Description: The proposed sidewalk project along east side of Haven Avenue will fill a gap where sidewalks are missing and provide improved
' ADA accessible access to Chaffey College.
Justification: This project is part of the City Master Plan.The improvements will improve pedestrian circulation as well as bring the area into
ADA compliance.
' Project Cost Estimate($j:
Expenditure/Cate¢ory Prior Years 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design/Plan Review $0 $13,000 $0 $0 $0 $13,000
Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
' Construction $0 $84,920 $0 $0 $0 $0 $84,920
Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Contingency $0 $12,740 $0 $0 $0 $0 $12,740
' Total Costs: $0 $110,660 $0 $0 $0 $0 $110,660
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 201314 201415 201516 201617 201718 TOTAL
Gas Tax RT7360(174) $0 $110,660 $0 $0 $0 $0 $110,660
Total Costs: $0 $110,660 $0 $0 $0 $0 $110,660
Impact on Operations: Reduction in parkway maintenance costs.
' H-17
JL Key: 1854 ,
Haven Avenue from Wilson to North City Limit - Pavement Rehabilitation
Project Location: ,
Haven Avenue,from Wilson
Avenue to North City Limit
HIDDE
)PROJI CATI N oFgR
SNI
Est.Construction Start/End: Q
08/2015-10/2015 STA ROJL S
2
Project Status: 2
Design
HILLSIDE R_D. IL—Jrs�l
Department:
Engineering F-7 �[a
Project Manager: (� WILSON ST.
Romeo David ----
Description: This project involves cold planing,localized asphalt removal and replacement,crack sealing,asphalt rubber hot mix overlay,traffic
signal loop replacement,utility valves and manhole adjustments,and pavement striping.
Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition,extending pavement life,use,and rideability. In
addition,the project is using asphalt rubber and is therefore eligible for a CalRecycle 3 rebate.
Project Cost Estimate
Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/1 TOTAL ,
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design/Plan Review $0 $15,000 $so0 $0 $0 $0 $15,500
Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $0 $0 $668,500 $0 $0 $668,500
Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $0 $15,000 $0 $0 $15,000
Contingency $0 $0 $0 $66,500 $0 $0 $66,500
Total Costs: $0 $15,000 $500 $750,000 $0 $0 $765,500
Project Funding: '
Funding Source Prior Years 2013/1 2014/15 2015/16 2016117 2017/1 TOTAL
Measure I Fund(176) $0 $15,000 $500 $0 $0 $0 $15,500
Measure I Fund(177) $0 $0 $0 $750,000 $0 $0 $750,000
Total costs: $0 $15,000 $500 $750,000 50 $0 $765,500 ,
Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance like pothole repairs,weed abatement and crack seal,thus freeing up maintenance crews
to attend to other needed areas.
H-18
' A Key: 1816
Hellman Avenue from Base Line Road to 19th Street - Pavement Rehabilitation
tProject Location:
Hellman Avenue,from Base Line 99TH I ST ¢ L®� L
Road to 19th Street
H
r�a Est.Construction Start/End: E VISTA Sly
08/2014—10/2014 ,
Project Status:
' Design W
Department: �—
Engineering
PW
ON
Project Manager: AR
Romeo David
Description: This project involves cold planing,localized asphalt removal and replacement,crack sealing,asphalt rubber hot mix overlay,traffic
signal loop replacement,utility valves and manhole adjustments,and pavement striping.
Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition,extending pavement life,use,and rideability. In
addition,the project is using asphalt rubber and is therefore eligible for a CalRecycle 2 rebate.
Project Cost Estimate($):
' Expenditure/Cateaory Prior Years 2013/14 2014115 2015116 2016/17 2017/1 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES 50 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design/Plan Review $25,000 $500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $25,500
Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $0 $365,500 $0 $0 $0 $365,500
' Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $8,000 $0 $0 $0 $8,000
Contingency $0 $0 $36,500 $0 $0 $0 $36,500
Total Costs: $25,000 $500 $410,000 $0 $0 $0 $435,500
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 2013114 2014/15 2015/16 2016/1 201711 TOTAL
Gas Tax R&T 7360 Fund(174) $25,000 $500 $410,000 $0 $0 $0 $435,500
Total Costs: $25,000 $500 $410,000 50 $0 $0 $435,500
' Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance like pothole repairs,weed abatement and crack seal,thus freeing up maintenance crews
to attend to other needed areas.
' H-19
JL Key: 1815 i
Hermosa Avenue from Banyan to Wilson - Pavement Rehabilitation
Project Location: ,
Hermosa Avenue,from Banyan
Street to Wilson Avenue _
HILLSIDE RD i
I WILSON AVE—
R
E=R JECT LOCATI N
Est.Construction Start/End: -
09/2016-10/2016 m - Zi _
z
V
ll �
Q 1L
Project Status: = BANYAN S� acx�xoxe - --
Design .. I-,__„�... -
Department
Engineering
t
Project Manager: - - - --
Curt Billings
Description: This project involves cold planning and localized asphalt removal and replacement, crack sealing,asphalt pavement overlay and
striping.
Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition,extending pavement life,use,and rideability.
Project Cost Estimate($):
Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2013/14 2014/15 2015116 2016/17 2017/18 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design/Plan Review $10,000 $500 $500 $0 $0 $0 $11,000
Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $0 $0 $230,000 $0 $0 $230,000
Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $0 $10,000 $o $0 $10,000
Contingency $0 $0 $0 $20,000 $0 $o $20,000
Total Costs: $10,000 $500 $500 $260,000 $0 $0 $271,000
Project Funding: '
Funding Source Prior Years 2013/1 2014/15 2015/1 2016/17 2017/1 TOTAL
Gas Tax RT7360(174) $10,000 $500 $500 $0 $0 $o $11,OOD
Unfunded $o $0 $0 $260,000 $O $0 $260,00D
Total Costs: $101000 $500 $500 $260,000 $0 $0 $11,000 ,
Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance like pothole repairs,weed abatement and crack seal,thus freeing up maintenance crews
to attend to other needed areas. ,
1
H-20
fJL Key: 1850
Hermosa Avenue from Main Street to Arrow Route - Pavement Rehabilitation
Project Location:
Hermosa Avenue, from Main
' Street to Arrow Route
ARRO TE.
ACLLd L
' Est.Construction Start/End: tOJECT LC CATIOP
04/2014—06/1014
�LuOW LL
O ❑ �o
Project Status: W ❑
' Design J I� _
MAIN ST.
Department:
Engineering
1 �
Project Manager:
Romeo David
Description: This project involves cold planing,localized asphalt removal and replacement,crack sealing,asphalt rubber hot mix overlay,traffic
signal loop replacement,utility valves and manhole adjustments,and pavement striping.
Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition,extending pavement life,use,and rideability.
i
Project Cost Estimate($):
' Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2013/14 2014115 2015/16 2016/1 2017/1 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
' Design/Plan Review $a $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $20,000
Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $160,000 $0 $0 $0 SO $160,000
Inspection&Administration $p $7,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,000
Contingency $0 $16,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $16,000
' Total costs: $0 $203,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $203,000
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 2013/14 2014115 2015/16 2016/17 2017/1 TOTAL
Gas Tax R&T 7360 Fund(174) $0 $203,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $203,000
Total Costs: $0 $203,000 $a $0 $0 $0 $203,000
1 Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance like pothole repairs,weed abatement and crack seal,thus freeing up maintenance crews
to attend to other needed areas.
' H-21
JL Key: 1793 t
Lemon Avenue from Archibald to Haven - Pavement Rehabilitation
Project Location:
Lemon Avenue, from Archibald _-
Avenue to Haven Avenue -
PROJECT LOCATION
_ _LEMON ST
Est.Construction Start/End: —
FY 2017/18 - - --- -_ - -
Project Status: - -- -
Design _ 19TH ST
>
Department:
y
Engineering - w - D - - -- '
_ W
Project Manager: . .. _¢
Curt Billings - permir n crTeir mmi - -
Description: This project involves,cold planning and localized asphalt removal and replacement,crack sealing,asphalt pavement overlay and
striping.
Justification: This projectwill restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition,extending pavement life,use,and rideability.
Project fast Estimate(SI:
Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2013/14 2014115 2015/1 2016/17 201711 TOTAL ,
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 So $0 $0
Design/Plan Review $10,000 $500 $500 $500 $500 $0 $12,000 '
Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $500,000
Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000 $10,000 '
Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $50,000
Total Costs: $10,000 $500 $500 $500 SSW $560,000 $572,000
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 2013/1 2014/1 201511 2016117 2017/1 TOTAL '
Prop 42 Fund(190) $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000
Gas Tax R&T 7360 Fund(174) $0 $500 $500 $500 $500 $0 $2,000
Unfunded $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $560,000 $560,000
Total Costs: $10,000 $500 $500 $500 $500 $560,000 $572,000
Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance like pothole repairs,weed abatement and crack seal,thus freeing up maintenance crews
to attend to other needed areas.
1
H-22 '
' JL Key: 1022
Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation at Various Locations
IProject Location:
Various Locations
-
1J T
Est.Construction Start/End: - - - -
04/2014-06/2014
Project Status:
Design and Construction 4�oWq,urE __
_ 1 BlVC
Department: -
Engineering -
erher PROJECT LOCATIONS
VARIOUS
project Manager. 4T STST
Romeo David
Description: This project involves either a slurry seal or asphalt overlay.
Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition,extending pavement life,use,and rideability.
Project Cost Estimate($):
ExpenditureExoenditure/Cates gory Prior Years 2012113 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016/1 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $o $0 $0 So $0 $0 $0
Design/Plan Review $0 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,000
Right-of-Way $o $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction 50 $1,500,000 $0 $0 $o $0 $115001000
' Inspection&Administration $0 $92,770 $0 $0 $0 $0 $92,770
Contingency 50 $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000
Total Costs: so $1,792,770 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,792,720
Project Funding:
' Funding Source Prior Years 201Z/13 2013/1 2014/15 2015/1 2016/17 TOTA
Gas Tax R&T 7360 Fund(174) $o $1,721,380 5o $0 $0 $0 $1,721,380
Prop 42 Fund(190) $0 $71,390 $o $0 $0 $0 $71,390
Total Costs: $0 $1,792,770 $u $0 50 $0 $1,792,770
Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance like pothole repairs,weed abatement and crack seal,thus freeing up maintenance crews
to attend to other needed areas.
' H-23
JL Key'. 1818
Madrone Avenue North of 9th Street - Widening with Southwest Cucamonga Park
Project Location:
Madrone Avenue, north of 9thC ---66 - - -
Street _
-- ARROW RTE. o - _—RO
�1.
Est Construction Start/End: I —_—
06/2014-07/2014 — -- ST
Project Status:
Design and Construction - 8TF1 ST - -- ---- —
a
Department:
Engineering
w -
SCALE NONE
Project Manager.
Curt Billings
Description: This project adds 320 linear feet of street widening and 3 street lights along the frontage of the new Southwest Cucamonga Park
that will be constructed concurrently.
Justification; This project will provide ADA accessibility and inprove pedestrian and vehicle safety along the sleet frontage of the new Southwest
Cucamonga Park.
Project Cost Estimate
Expenditure/Cateaory Prior Years 2013/1 2014/15 2015/1 2016/17 2017/1 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES 50 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design/Plan Review $10,000 $500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,500
Right-of-Way 50 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $o
Construction $0 $0 $114,200 $0 $0 So $114,200
Inspection&Administration $0 50 $0 $0 $0 So So '
Contingency $0 $0 $13,000 $0 $0 $o $13,000
Total Costs: $10,000 $500 $127,200 $0 $0 $0 $137,700
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Year 201311 2014/15 2015/1 201611 2017/1 TOTAL '
Gas Tax RT7360(174) $10,000 $500 $127,200 $0 $0 $0 $137,700
Total Costs: $10,000 $SW $127,200 $0 $0 $0 $137,700
Impact on Operations: This project adds 3 street lights into Street Light Maintenace districts SLD 2 and SLD 6.
H-24 ,
A Key: 1821
Rochester Avenue from Foothill Boulevard to Base Line Road - Pavement Rehabilitation
Project Location: ( y =_—
Rocnester Avenue from Foothill _ _ BASE LINE RD
Boulevard to Base line Road
.. CNURSH OT SCNIE ANNE
I
Est.Construction Start/End:
09/201fi-10/201,16 =_ _PRId�f
j+dd mT
Project Status: � I
Design ---
�' FOOTHILL _BLVD_
Department:
Engineering ! y
i
Project Manager - _ 1 ARROW ROUTE
Curt Billings
Description: This project involves cold planning and localized asphalt removal and replacement,crack sealing,asphalt pavement overlay and
striping.
t
JustiRatlon: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition,extending pavement life,use,and rideability.
Project Cost Estimate($):
Expenditure/Category Prior Year 2013/1 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/1 TOTAL
EnvironmentaVNPDES $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $D
Design/Plan Review $10,000 $500 $500 $500 $0 $0 511,500
Right-of-Way $0 $o $o $0 $o $0 $o
Construction $0 $0 50 50 $520,000 $0 $520,000
1 Inspection&Administration $0 $o $o So $10,000 $0 510,000
Contingency $0 $0 So $o $60,000 $0 $60,000
Total Costs: $101000 $500 $500 $500 $5901000 $0 $601,500
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Year 201314 201415 201516 201617 201718 TOTAL
Measure I Fund(177) $10,000 $500 $500 $4,000 $590,000 $0 $605,000
Total Costs: $10,000 $500 $500 $4.000 $590,000 $o $605,000
Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance like pothole repairs,weed abatement and crack seal,thus freeing up maintenance crews
to attend to other needed areas.
lil ' H-25
J,Key. 1838
Victoria Street from Etiwanda Avenue to East City Limit - Widening and Pavement Rehabilitation
Project Location:
Victoria Street, from Etiwanda BAN VAN 57
Avenue to East City Limit
a >
Est Construction Start/End: _
06/201506/2015
FONTANA
Project Status: - - -- I -
Design VICTORIA ST.
Department: -
Engineering
SCALE:NONE
Project Manager. BASE LINE D —
P JECT LOCATION
Curt Billings -
Description: This project involves curb and gutter,asphalt pavement,cold planing,and ac overlay and striping. t
JustNiotion: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition,extending pavement life,use,and rideability.
The project may widen areas lacking sidewalks for improved pedestrian access.
Project Cost Estimate($):
Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2013114 2014115 2015/16 2016/17 2017/1 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 50 $0 50 s0 50 $0
Design/Plan Review 50 550,000 50 50 $0 50 $50,000 ,
Right-of-Way 5o $0 $o 50 $0 $o $o
Construction 50 $0 $300,000 $o So $0 5300,000
Inspection&Administration $o $0 $30,000 50 $0 $0 $30,000
Contingency s0 so $30,000 $0 50 $0 $30,000
Total Costs: $0 $50,000 $360,000 50 50 $0 $610,000
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 201314 201415 2015/1 201617 20171 TOTAL
Transportation Fund(124) $0 $25,000 $0 $0 $0 50 $25,000
Measure I Fund(176) $0 $15,000 $0 50 $0 50 $15,000 '
Measure I Fund(177) 50 $10,000 50 $0 $0 $0 $10,000
Unfunded $0 $0 $360,000 50 s0 $0 $360,000
Total Costs: $0 $50,000 $360,000 $0 50 $0 $610,000
Impact on operations: Less routine maintenance like pothole repairs,weed abatement and crack seal,thus freeing up maintenance crews
to attend to other needed areas.
H-26 t
JLKey 1601
Youngs Canyon Road from Koch Place to Cherry Avenue - Street Extension
' Project Location:
Youngs Canyon Road,Koch Place
' to Cherry Avenue u
a
I = PROJE ATION
AVE
Est.Construction Start/End: -
04/2015-10/2015 -
' C EKAPMKI y0UNG5 CANYON
Project Status: - — /
BANYAN ST
' Design
Department: F
y
Engineering
Project Manager: - ---- —
Curt Billings
Description: The extension of Youngs Canyon Road between Koch Place and Cherry Avenue will construct a 4 lane road across a flood control
' basin and connect to Cherry Avenue.
Justification: This extension of Youngs Canyon Road will provide a secondary access to development west of Cherry Avenue and an easterly
extension of Banyan Street which connects to Youngs Canyon Road to the west.It will also relieve traffic congestion on Wilson
Avenue to the north.
Project Cost Estimate($):
Expenditure/Catexory Prior Years 2013/14 2014115 2015/1 2016/17 2017/18 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 so $100,000 $0 $0 $100,000
Design/Plan Review $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $150,000
Right-of-Way So so $0 $525,000 50 50 S525,OD0
Construction $0 $0 5o $600,000 $0 $0 5600,000
' Inspection&Administration So so so $25,000 $0 $0 $25,000
Contingency $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $0 $0 $100,000
Total Costs: $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $1,350,000 $0 $0 $1,500,000
Project Funding:
' Funding Source Prior Years 201314 201415 201516 201617 201718 TOTAL
AD 88-2 Etiw/Highlnd Impry(813) $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $1,350,000 $0 50 51,500,000
Total Costs: $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $1,350,000 $0 $0 $1,500,000
' Impact on Operations: Adds 1,000 feet of roadway to the City's street maintenance program. A more detailed cost estimate will be
available after the design phase is complete.
' H-27
Elm-in � -I
u
{j
Y
' Traffic =�
Projects included in this section are typically
those that will promote safe and efficient traffic circulation per State
and local design standards. Many of these projects include new signals, upgrades to
intersections - such as additional turn pockets or signal timing upgrades - as well as synchroni-
zation and coordination projects that promote traffic flows along the City's heaviest traveled arterial streets.
Traffic Projects are typically funded via Transportation Development Funds. However, Measure I, Gas Tax Funds, Street
' Lighting Districts and some grant funding are also possible funding sources.
' Sources of Funding for FY 2013-14
Project List& FY 2013-14 Expenditures
' g3zs.000
I. Day Creek Blvd. @ Silverberry $25.000
Upgrade Traffic Signal Left Turn
Phases
' 2. Day Creek Blvd. @ Victoria Park $25,000
Lane-Upgrade Traffic Signal Left
Turn Phases
3. Haven Ave. @ Valencia- Left Turn $75.000
Pocket Extension
4. Traffic Management Center- $200,000
Upgrade Project Citywide
Total $325,000
' ■Transportation
I
1
' JL Key: 1845
Day Creek Boulevard at Silverberry Street- Upgrade Traffic Signal Left Turn Phases
Project Location:
Day Creek Boulevard at Silverberry Q to BANYAN ST _
Street uWi
Q
Amok
Est.Construction Start/End: - __—
' 01/2014-04/2014 - HIGHLANDAVE
Project Status: - 8k PROJECT ST PROJECT LOCATION
' Design '
Department _ VICTORIA PARK LN \"
' Engineering
i
PACIFIC ELECTRIC TRAIL
Project Manager: --__ --
Jason Welday
Description: The scope of work to be performed in general consists of,but is not limited to,removing protected-permissive left turn phasing
' and replacing with protected left turn phasing on Day Creek Boulevard for the traffic signal at this location.
Justification: The project will improve safety for vehicles and pedestrians by providing an exclusive phase for left turn vehicle movements.In
' addition, pedestrian crossings will occur separate from left turn movements, which previously occurred simultaneously with
protected-permissive traffic signal equipment.
Project Cost Estimate($):
' Expenditure/Cateaory Prior Year 2013/1 2014/15 2015/16 2016/1 201711 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
' Design/Plan Review $D $1,000 $0 $0 So $0 $1,000
Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $o So $0 $o
Construction $0 $20,000 $o $0 $0 $0 $20,000
' Inspection&Administration $0 $2,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,000
Contingency $0 $2,000 $0 $0 $0 $o $2,000
' Total Costs: $0 $25,000 $0 $0 SO $0 $25,000
Project Funding:
' Funding Source Prior Years 201314 201415 201516 201617 201718 TOTAL
Transportation(124) $0 $25,000 $0 $o $0 $0 $25,000
Total Costs: $0 $25,000 $0 $0 50 $0 $25,000
Impact on Operations: After installation and configuration of the protected left turn traffic signal equipment, no additional impacts on
operations will be present.
I-1
JL Key. 1846 '
Day Creek Boulevard at Victoria Park Lane - Upgrade Traffic Signal Left Turn Phases
Project Location: w -- - ,
Day Creek Boulevard at victoria ¢ L BANYAN ST
Park Lane of
QU
Est.Construction Start/End:
01/2014-04/2014 - HIGHLAND AVE
Project Status: -_. _ Sl<v�RQFRRY ,
Design ,, ST
PROJECT LOCATION '
Department: VICTORIA PARK L
Engineering
Protect Manager. - - PACIFIC ELECTRIC TRAIL ---t+OT TO SCALE
Jason Welday a,.e- --..—_ _
Description: The scope of work to be performed in general consists of,but is not limited to,removing protected-permissive left turn phasing
and replacing with protected left turn phasing on Day Creek Boulevard for the traffic signal at this location.
1
Justification: The project will improve safety for vehicles and pedestrians by providing an exclusive phase for left turn vehicle movements.In
addition, pedestrian crossings will occur separate from left turn movements, which previously occurred simultaneously with
protected-permissive traffic signal equipment. '
Project Cost Estimate(SI:
Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2013/14 2014/15 2015/1 2016117 2017/18 TOTAL '
Environmental/NPDES $o $0 SO $0 So SO $0
Design/Plan Review $0 $1,000 So $0 $0 $0 $1,000 '
Right-of-Way so $o $0 $o $o $o $o
Construction $0 $20,000 so $0 $0 $o $20,000
Inspection&Administration $0 $2,000 $0 $0 $o $0 $2,000 '
Contingency $0 $2,000 $0 $o $0 $o $2,000
Total Costs: $o $25,000 $o $0 $0 $0 $25,000
Project Funding: '
Funding Source Prior Years 2013/1 2014/15 2015/16 2016/1 201711 TOTAL '
Transportation(124) $0 $25,000 $0 $o so So $25,000
Total Costs: $0 $25,000 $0 50 $0 $0 $25,000
Impact on operations: After installation and configuration of the protected left tum traffic signal equipment, no additional impacts on ,
operations will be present.
1-2
' JL Key: 1841
Haven Avenue at Valencia Avenue - Left Turn Pocket Extension
1 Project location: - -
Haven Avenue southbound left ---
turn pocket at Valencia Avenue --
PAR
i
Ep Q
Est.Construction Start/End: Q + - Q — - Z
' 09/2013-10/2013 0 -_--- _ IZjJ
Project status: -PACIFIC ELECTRIC TRATE -�R9.�ECiT L�+/�1�ON= -
Design - --" -
VALENCIAAVE - .
CENTRAL
Department: PAR A
Engineering -- - - - ASE LINE ` - RD_
' NOT TO SCALE
Project Manager -
' Jason Welday - -- - —- - - --- - -
Description: The scope of work to be performed in general consists of, but is not limited to,extending the left turn pocket to increase the
' queuing capacity.
Justification: The project will improve safety by providing additional space for left turn stacking and decreasing the amount of vehicles queuing
in the southbound through lane.
Project Cost Estimate($):
' Expenditure/Category Prior years 2013/1 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/1 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
' Design/Plan Review $0 $1,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,500
Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $65,000 $D $0 $0 $0 $65,000
'
Inspection&Administration $0 $2,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,000
Contingency $0 $6,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,500
tTotal CASK: $0 $75,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $75,000
Project Funding:
' Funding Source Prior years 2013 14 2014/15 2015/1 2016/17 2017/1 TOTAL
Transportation(124) $0 $75,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $75,000
Total Costs: $0 $75,000 $0 $0 $0 SD $75,000
' Impact on Operations: The median landscaping will decrease with the additional space constructed for the left turn pocket,which reduces
irrigation and maintenance costs forthe median.
' 1-3
A Key 1831 '
Traffic Management Center - Upgrade Project Citywide
Project Location:
Citywide - CHURCH ST -- - Pm
-
Z
z
33
—- FOO7HtCL BLVD FOOTHILL BLVD
Est.Construction Start/End:
12/2013-06/2013 -- --- PROJECT --
- �- LOCATION ,
Project Status: . CIVIC CANTER DR
Design
-, ARROW ROUTE < t
Department:
Engineering - - _ - --- .moi
-- -----. JERSEY BLVD '
Project Manager: _ --_ .A
—_
Craig Cruz
Description: The scope of work to be performed in general consists of, but not limited to, upgrading system software, educating staff with
operations and maintenance of the traffic management center, troubleshooting and upgrading traffic signals that are not
communicating with the traffic management center. ,
Justification: The project will upgrade communications to enable better monitoring,re-timing and coordination of the City's traffic signals for
improved traffic flow and safety.
Project Cost Estimate($): '
Expenditure/Cateeory Prior Years 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016/1 2017/18 TOTAL ,
Consultant Services $o $40,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $40,000
Staff Training $595 $12,000 $0 $0 50 $0 $12,595 '
Design/Equipment Specifications $0 $16,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $16,000
Procurement/Construction $99,405 $110,000 $0 $0 50 $0 $209,405
System Testing and Integration $0 $16,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $16,000 ,
Contingency $0 $6,000 $o $o $0 $0 $6,000
Total Costs: $100,000 $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 201314 201415 201516 201611 201718 TOTAL
Transportation(124( $100,000 $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000 '
Total Costs: $100,000 $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,OOD
Impact on Operations: The traffic management center over time will improve maintenance staff efficiencies and reduce related costs.
These system upgrades will also provide substantial improvements in system-wide signal timing and coordination, '
improving operational efficiencies,while also resulting in fewer citizen complaints.
1-4
Future & Unfunded
iProjects included in this section are those that have been identified
as being a priority project, but lack dedicated funding for the upcoming fiscal year.
Projects designated as 'Unfunded' could be waiting on grant approval, or until new special fund monies become available.
Projects showing dedicated funding sources, but which are slated to occur in future fiscal years have mostly likely been
delayed due to issues with the future funding of operating expenses. In many cases, funds can be found for the capital
' construction of a project like a new library or community center, but City management has not yet devised a way to fund
the necessary staff or overhead expenses required to run a new facility.
This section illustrates those priority projects that did not make it into the FY 2013/14 budget for either of these
' reasons. Staff is actively pursuing grant or other fundraising opportunities for several of the projects in this section.
Project List& FY 2013-14 Expenditures Project List& FY 2013-14 Expenditures
' I. Archibald Ave,Church to Palo Alto- $1,215,000 20.Milliken Ave at Vintage-Upgrade $25,000
Storm Drain Traffic Signal Lek Turn Phases
2. Arrow Rte at Railroad Spur- New $75,000 21. Pacific Electric Trail Enhance- $110,000
' Concrete Panels menu-West to East City Limits
3. Civic Center and Public Safety Bldg- $10,000 22. Red Hill Park-Pedestrian Paseo $100,000
Retrofit of Exterior Glass Doors
23. Upper Cucamonga Storm $3,900,000
4. Civic Center-Earthquake Strapping $50,000 Drain Phase 3
S. Etiwanda Ave-Grade Separation at $35,000,000 24.Various Intersections-Safety Light $150,000
Metrolink Tracks Upgrades
' 6. Etiwanda Creek Park-Phase II $5,580,000 25.Windrows Park-Fire Lane Repair $30,000
7. Fire District- Banyan Station $2,500,000 Total $80,364,100
8. Fire District-Central Station 178 $8,000,000 Sources of Funding for FY 2013-14
' 9. Fire District-Operation/Dispatch $11,000,000 $225,000 $75,000$1e0,000
Building $245.000 $90.000 $29.90
$5,580,00 21 000
10. Fire District-San Bernardino $6,500,000
' Station 172
11.Foothill Blvd across SCE Corridor w/o $145,000
Day Creek Channel-Sidewalk
' 12.Foothill Blvd,Grove to San Bernardino $4,630,000
- Widening and Median
$28,000,000
13.Hellman Ave at Metrolink Tracks- $790,000
Widen Crossing 45,565000
' 14.Hermosa Park-Light Pole Replace- $25,000
ment
15.Lions Park East Community Center- $60,000
' Flooring Replacement
16. LMD I Trail-Concrete Drainage $19,100 ■Unknown Fire Capital Project
Improvement
' 17. LMD 411-Water Conservation and ®$400,000 Park Development LMD 411
Renov
ons
Landscape uta Citywide Infrastructure . Transportation
18.Milliken Ave at at Mountain View Dr- $25,000
' Upgrade Traffic Signal Leh Turn F:1 PD 85 Redemption ■ Gas Tax RT7360
Phases
19.Milliken Ave at Terra Vista Pkwy- $25,000 J Capital Reserves Beautification
' Upgrade Traffic Signal Left Turn
Phases .LMD I
1 Ill.Key: 1805
Archibald Avenue from Church Street to Palo Alto Street- Storm Drain
1 Project Location: PACIFIC ELECTRIC TZIL.- —_
Archibald Avenue,Foothill - -� _
1 Boulevard to Baseline Road
VH _ - _ BASE LINE RDALOALTO -RROJECT LOCATION
Est.Construction Start/End:To be determinedProject Status:Design and Construction
- FOOTHILL BLVD
Department.
1 Engineering - - -- --
I �
Project Manager:
1 Romeo David
Description: Construct a Master Plan Storm Drain,install catch basins,manholes,and laterals.
i
Justification: This project will improve drainage within the area.
1 Project Cost Estimate($):
1 Expenditure/Category Prior years 202311 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 TBD TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $o $0
1 Design/Plan Review $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $35,000 $35,000
Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000 $1,000,000
1
Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $80,000 $80,000
Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $100,000
Total Costs: $0 $0 So $0 $0 $1,215,000 $1,215,000
1 Project Funding:
1 Funding Source Prior years 2013/1 2014/15 2015/1 2016/17 TBD TOTAL
Unknown Fund Name(xxx) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,215,000 $1,215,000
Total Costs: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,215,000 $1,215,000
Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance, potholes and sand bags for storm water protection and storm water cleanup, thus
freeing up maintenance crews to attend to other needed areas.
1
IL Key: 1819 ,
Arrow Route at Railroad Spur- New Concrete Panels
Project Location:
Arrow Route at Railroad Spur west - - -of Milliken Avenue /
I
FOOTHILL BLVD
a PROJECT LOCATION
Est.Construction Start/End: -- —- i dillin _ ADULT w
05/2014-07/2014 - > COMPLEX O
a
g
_ ARROW ROUTE
Project Status:
—
Design and Construction _. - Z t
- — — JERSEY BLVD
�1- J
Department:
Engineering RAIL ROAD p/ '
Project Manager: - TIE7
Romeo David
Description: Replace existing uneven rubber panels to concrete panels.
Justification: The existing rubber panels are uneven and damaged due to heavy traffic used,replacing two concrete panels will give smoother
ride and safety for the vehicles.
Project Cost Estimate($1:
Expenditure/Cateaory Prior Years 2013/1 2014/15 2015/1 2016117 2017/18 TOTAL ,
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 50 50 $0 $0 $0
Design/Plan Review $0 $0 $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $10,000 ,
Right-of-Way $0 $0 50 $0 $0 So $0
Construction $0 $0 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $50,000
Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $10,oD0 ,
Contingency $0 $0 $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $5,000
Total Costs: so $o $75,000 $0 $0 $0 $75,000
Project Funding: '
Funding Source Prior Years 2013/14 2014/15 2015/1 2016/1 2017/18 TOTAL '
Gas Tax RT7360 Fund(174) $0 $0 $75,000 $0 $0 $0 $75,D00
Total Costs: $0 $0 $75,000 $0 50 $0 $75,000
Impact on Operations: Uneven rubber panels create damage along the edges of the existing asphalt pavement.This project will reduce
maintenance for asphalt replacement.
t
J-2 '
1 JL Key:
Civic Center and Public Safety Building - Retrofit of Exterior Glass Doors
1 Project Location:
Civic Center and Public Safety
Buildings � � � � � � � ' � 33333V"S Lltico
1 10500 Civic Center Drive
o O
1L �
Esc.Construction start/End: PROD CT LOC ION
' 08/2013-05/2014 68
Project Status:
1 Requested FY 2013-2014 ❑
O
Department:
1 Public Works Services
Project Manager:
1 Ty quaintance
Description: Replace existing glass doors at main entrance of the Civic Center and the Public Safety Buildings.
Justification: The existing glass doors do not meet current ADA access standards.
1
Project Cost Estimate($):
1 Expenditure/Catecory Prior Years 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 201711 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
1 Design/Plan Review $10,000 $0 $10,000 $o $0 $0 $20,000
Right-of-Way $0 $0 so $0 $0 $0 $o
Construction $0 $0 So $0 $0 $0 $0
1
Inspection&Administration So $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Contingency $o $0 $0 $o $o $0 So
1 Total Costs: $10,000 $0 $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $20,000
Project Funding:
1 Funding Source Prior Years 201311 2014/15 2015/1 2016/17 2017/1 TOTAL
Capital Reserve(025) $10,000 $0 $10,000 $0 $o $0 $20,000
Total Costs: $10,000 $0 $10,000 $0 So $0 $20,000
iImpact on Operations: Temporary inconvenience when new doors are installed.
1
1
1 J-3
A Key: '
Civic Center - Earthquake Strapping
Project Location:
Civic Center (1����qi,\��V uuv °o
10500 Civic Center Drive �uu� � t
sem, J
Est.Construction start/End: PROJ CT LOC ION
86
August/2013-May/2014 '
Project Status: _
Requested FY 2013-2014 1❑
Department:
Public Works Services
o
Project Manager:
Ty Quaintance
Description: Install earthquake strapping to City equipment(including file cabinets)throughout the Civic Center.
Justification: Shaking caused by a strong earthquake may tip over or move office equipment thereby increasing chances of injury or damage.
Installation of earthquake strapping will secure equipment in place.
Project Cost Estimate ISI:
Expenditure/Category Prior years 2013/1 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 TBD TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $o $0
Design/Plan Review $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 s0 $0
Right-of-Way $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction So $D $0 $o $0 $50,000 $50,000
Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 '
Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 so $0 $0
Total Costs: $0 $0 $0 $o So $50,000 $50,000
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior years 2013/14 2014/15 2015/1 201611 TBD TOTAL
Capital Reserve(025) $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $50,000 $50,000
Total Costs: $0 $0 $0 % $0 $50,000 $50,000
Impact on Operations: Temporary inconvenience to Civic Center personnel while earthquake strapping being installed to their equipment. '
J-4
' JL Key: 1076
Etiwanda Avenue - Grade Separation at Metrolink Tracks
' Project Location: - --
Etiwanda Avenue from 6th Street RANCHO FONTANA
GUCAMONGA !
to Arrow Roue
I
ARROW ROUTE
Est.Construction Start/End: WHITTRAM AVE. � scare:rvorve
To be determined RAILROAD
Project Status:
' Design
6TH ST
Department:
Engineering
PROJECT
Project Manager: LOCATION
Curt Billings
Description: Prepare preliminary design drawings for a future grade separation on Etiwanda Avenue at the Metrolink Railroad Crossing south
of Whitram Avenue.
' Justification: This project will improve safety and traffic circulation on Etiwanda Avenue.
' Project Cost Estimate($1�
Expenditure/Cateaory Prior Years 2013/14 2014/1S 2015/1 2016/17 T8o TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES 50 SO 50 $0 $0 $0 $0
' Design/Plan Review $337,000 $100,000 $50,000 550,000 $50,000 $0 $587,000
Right-of-Way 50 50 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
' Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $32,000,000 $32,000,000
Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,000,000 $3,000,000
Total Costs: $337,000 $100,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $35,000,000 $35,587,000
Project Funding:
' Funding Prior Years 2013/14 2014/15 2015/1 2016/17 TBD TOTAL
Transportation Fund(124) $337,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $337,000
Unfunded So $100,000 $50,000 $50,000 S50,000 $35,000,000 $35,250,000
Total Costs: $337,000 $100,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $35,000,000 $35,587,000
Impact on Operations: Added maintenance costs for a new bridge will be determined during design phase.
t J-5
A Key 1664
Etiwanda Creek Park - Phase II
Project location: '
Etiwanda Creek Park 5939 D
East Avenue
Est.construction start/End: PROJECT L CATION �j
unknown L—JLJ
e i
Project Status: aaaR /
eHxa
Design �6
Department:
Community Services/Parks L
Project Manager: __- - --------
Karen McGuire-Emery �n`ll _
Description: This project involves the construction of additional athletic fields which include mufti-use recreation fields,tennis courts,a"wet"
play area,a 10,000-15,000 sq.ft.community building,storage/maintenance facility and additional parking.
Justification: The City Council identified this project as a goal for Fy2007-08.
Project Cost Estimate($): '
Expenditure/Category Prior years 2013/14 2014115 2015/1 2016/17 2017/1 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $o $0 $0 50 50 50 $0 '
Design/Plan Review $159,230 $0 $300,000 $o $0 $0 $459,230
Right-of-Way $o $0 $o $o $o $0 $0
Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 55,280,000 $0 $5,280,000
Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 So 50 $0
Contingency $0 $0 So $0 50 $0 50 '
Total Costs: $159,230 $0 $300.000 50 $5,250,000 $0 $5,739,230
Project Funding: ,
Funding Source Prior Year 2013/14 2014115 2015/1 2016/17 2016/17 TOTAL
Park Development(120) $159,230 $0 $300,000 $0 $5,280,000 $0 $5,739,230 '
Total Costs: $159,230 $0 $300,000 $0 $5,280,000 $0 $5,739,230
Impact on Operations: Completion of this project will add a new facility to the City's inventory which will require operational extenditures
for maintenance,staffing,overhead and utilities. Initial estimates place the cost of maintaining two addional fields
at$300,000-$400,000.
1
J-6 '
1 JL Key: 1779
Fire District- Banyan Station 175 Expansion
1 Project location: L
Banyan Station(175)
1 11108 Banyan Street
7L
H s.
O
ROJECT
1 L CATION CHAFFEY
Est.Construction Start/End: --�^—� COLLEGE
2016/17-2017/18 TATZZLy DR
1 LOS OSOS
HIGH SCHOO
Project Status: Tivµ
1 Design pending-project on hold [�
Department: D
1 Fire Protection District
D U
Project Manager: t
Mike Bell/Pamela Pane
Description: Expansion of the existing facility to accommodate additional services operating out of that facility, primarily apparatus storage.
1 Utilized for the Technical Rescue and Wildland Fire Response programs.
Justification: The Banyan Station houses specialized service resources that are currently parked outside and subject to wear and tear from the
elements.
1 Project Cost Estimate($):
1 Expenditure/Category Prior Year 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017118 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES SO $0 $0 $0 $0 SO $0
1 Design/Plan Review $0 $0 $0 $500,000 SO $0 $500,000
Right-of-Way SO $0 $0 $0 $0 so $0
Construction $0 $0 $0 $7,000,000 $0 $2,000,000
1 Inspection&Administration $o $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 50
Contingency $0 $0 $o So $0 So $0
Total Costs: $0 So $0 $500,000 $2,000,000 50 52,500,000
1 Project funding:
1 Funding Source Prior years 2013/1 2014115 2015/16 2016/17 2017/1 TOTAL
Fire Capital Projects(288) so $0 $0 $500,000 $2,000,000 SO $2,500,000
Total Costs: SO $0 $0 $50D,000 $2,000,000 $0 S2,50D,000
1 Impact on Operations: No additional personnel costs. Slightly increased operations and maintenance costs for utilities due to increased
square footage.
1
1 J7
JL Key: 1645
Fire District - Central Station 178 (New Fire Station)
Project Location: iLJLULU
Within the boundary of south of C E N T R A L oo �D
Base Line Road,north of Foothill P A R K ® �.. o '
Boulevard,east of Haven Avenue
a.
and west of Milliken Avenue � //� 0�
d`
a 1
Est.Construction Start/End: Uu
UnknownUU(jC
1
Project Status: PROJECT
Design/Choose New Location O LOCATIO
Department: r /
fire Protection District 1
THILL LVD.
Project Manager:
Chief Mike Bell/Pamela Pane rtr"'LLc
i
Description: New Fire Station construction. New property for this station is being identified.
1
Justification: New Fire Station was recommended in the Fire District's 2005 Strategic Plan. This station will serve the center of the Rancho
Cucamonga community,providing the area with emergency services for fire suppression and life safety.
Project Cost Estimate
Expenditure/Category Prior Year 2013/14 2014/15 2015/1 2016/17 TBD TOTAL 1
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 50 SO $0 $0 5o
Design/Plan Review $0 50 50 SO $0 $0 $0
Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 S0 so
Construction 50 50 $0 $0 50 58,000,000 $8,000,000
Inspection&Administration $o $o $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 1
Contingency $0 $0 50 $0 5o $0 $0
Total Costs: $0 $D SO $0 S0 $8,000,000 58,000,000
Project Funding: 1
Funding Source Prior years 2013/14 2014/15 2015/1 2016/1 TBD TOTAL 1
Fire Capital Projects(288) $0 $0 so $0 $0 $8,000,000 $8,001
Total Costs: 50 $0 $0 50 50 $8,000,000 $8,000,000
impact on Operations: Annual station operations and maintenance costs will depend on the station size and staffing costs at the time of 1
construction. Designs with greater active/passive energy conservation and greater xeriscape will cost less to
operate. Capital equipment purchase of an engine.
i
J-8 ,
1 A Key'
Fire District - Operations/Dispatch Building �\
1 ProjectLocation:
Northwest corner
of Civic Center
Drive and Utica Avenue LEI
P CT TION
Est.Construction$tart/Eruf. L �6 6
Unknown
1
Project Status:
1 Re-design pending �❑
Department:
Fire Protection District
Project Manager: IE3F—
1 Chief Mike Bell/Pamela Pane
Description: This project will construct a building to house Fire District Headquarters personnel and a possible dispatch center.
1
Justification: Fire District Administration personnel have outgrown the current area in the Civic Center building. A new facility was recommended In the
2005 Strategic Plan to consolidate Fire Administration functions. There may be a future need to add a dispatch center.
1
Project Cost Estimate($):
Expenditure/Category Prior Years 201311 2014/15 2015 16 2016/1 TRD TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
1 Design/Plan Review $0 $0 $0 $0 So $1,000,000 S1,00D,000
Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $o $0
Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 SO $10,000,000 $10,000,000
1 Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Contingency $0 $o $0 So $D $0 $o
Total Costs: $0 So $0 $0 $0 $11,000,000 $11,000,000
1 Project Funding:
1 Funding Source Prior Years 201314 201415 201516 201617 TBD TOTAL
Fire Capital Projects(288) $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $11,000,000 $11,000,000
Total Costs: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $11,000,000 $11,000,000
1 Impact on Operations: Fire District operations and maintenance costs will increase with increased square footage, but will be unknown
until final design is complete.
1
1
1 J9
A Key: 1733 '
Fire District - San Bernardino Station 172 Demolition and Relocation
Project Location: '
San Bernardino station(172) n
9612 San Bernardino Road ui
CHURCH ST -
-Q SEFiFNF allaal ,djj Z
G --z 3 ppR6lTyT-Ft >
Est.Construction Start/End: - ¢
SAN BERNARDINO _ _ -; -. sAFFORosr �
Unknown - - --
Project status: FOOTHILL LVD. 86
�_
On Hold a ' 6.......r -- - — - - — Hxws -1
- �-_ a -PROJECT LOCATION '
z
Department:
Fire Protection District
xuxocn ar = - --
-msnrz.
Proles Manager: AF- _ --AR1t=RIILLTJ=
Chief Mike Bell/Pamela Pane
Description: Construction to relocate and rebuild the fire station. Alternate locations are being explored,If none are found,station will be rebuilt at
San Bernardino Road location. Project placed on hold pending the completion of other higher priority capital projects.
Justification: The Fire District's 2005 Strategic Plan recommended the 55-year old fire station be rebuilt. This station serves the southwestern portion '
of the Rancho Cucamonga community,providing the area with emergency services for fire suppression and life safety.
Project Cost Estimate($):
Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2013/14 2014/15 2015/1 2016117 TBD TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $o $o $0 $o $0
Design/Plan Review $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $5001000
Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $o
Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,000,000 $6,000,000
Inspection&Administration $o $o $o $0 So $o 50
Contingency $0 $0 $o $0 So $0 $0
Total Costs: $0 $0 $0 $0 $o $6,500,000 $6,500,000
Project Funding: '
Funding Source Prior Years 2013/1 2014/1S 2015/1 2016/17 TBD TOTAL '
Fire Capital Projects(288) $0 $0 $o $0 50 $6151101000 $6,500,000
Total Costs: $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $6,500,000 $6,500,000
Impact on Operations: No additional personnel costs are anticipated. The current San Bernardino Station personnel will move to the new '
station when complete. Larger station design could create an increase in maintenance costs,but greater efficiency
in station equipment could make it a wash. ,
1
J-10
JL Key: 1826
Foothill Boulevard across SCE Corridor West of Day Creek Channel -Sidewalk
' Project Location:
Foothill Boulevard,SCE Corridor — ——
Westof Day Creek Channel - -- --- CHURCH$T
U fYy, i
Est.Construction Start/End:
' 1/2014-2/2014 '_CIS,
I
Project status:
' Design and Construction ADULT
SIP PLE PROJECT LOCATION
W COMPLE
Q
Department:
Engineering
f
Project Manager:
' Romeo David -
Description: This project will install 600 feet of sidewalk to close a gap between two existing sections of sidewalk.
Justification: This project was requested by handicap residents using this route everyday.The improvements will Improve pedestrian circulation
' as well as bring the area into ADA compliance.
Project Cost Estimate($):
' Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2013/14 2014115 201S/1 2016/17 2017118 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 50 $0
Design/Plan Review $0 $0 $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $10,1100
Right-of-Way $0 So $0 $0 $o $0 $0
Construction $0 $0 $110,000 $0 $o $0 $110,000
' Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $14,000 $0 $0 $0 $14,000
Contingency $0 $0 $11,000 $0 $0 $0 $11,000
' Total Cos": $0 50 $145,000 $0 $0 $0 $145,000
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 2013/1 2014115 2015/16 2016/17 2017/1 TOTAL
Infastructure Fund(198) $0 $0 $145,000 $0 $0 $0 $145,000
Total Costs: $0 $0 $145,000 $0 $0 $0 $145,000
' Impact on Operations: This project will reduce maintenance and weed abatement costs from General Fund and LMD 3B.
J-11
JL Key: 1189
Foothill Boulevard from Grove Avenue to San Bernardino Road -Widening with Median Island
including Landscaped Median to Vineyard '
Project Location: OHILL
Foothill Boulevard from Grove Avenue to San Bernardino Road,including landscaped median to _ PROJECT-LOCATION
Vineyard Avenue -
FOOTHILL BLVD
zz - 66
Q > Q
Est.Construction Start/End:
To be determined
Q Q�. W W _
Y w
> U
Project Status: J - -_ -- > Q '
Design
W ROUTE
Department:
UI McF<INLEY STREET
Engineering
Project Manager. CITY _
Curt Billings __ 8-MSTREETCITY LIMIT YARD '
Description: This project is the last phase of the multi phased Foothill Boulevard street and bridge Improvements and Includes right-of-way
acquisition,utility relocation,street widening,storm drain and landscape improvements,including arches at both the west and
east City limits.
Justification: This project will provide increased traffic and pedestrian circulation including safety and visual enhancements. The project is '
identified in the City's General Plan,the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan and has been marked as a City Council goal.
Project Cost Estimate S): '
Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2013114 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $o $o $o
Design/Plan Review $3,096,000 SO $0 $30,000 $0 $0 $3,126,000
Right-of-Way $713,000 $0 $0 $141,000 $0 $0 $854,000
Construction $9,884,000 $0 $0 $4,059,000 $0 $0 $13,943,000 '
Inspection&Administration $613,000 $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $613,000
Contingency $1,289,000 $0 $0 $400,000 $0 $0 $1,689,000 '
Total Costs: $15,595,000 $0 $0 $4,630,000 50 $0 $20,225,000
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior years 2013/14 2014/1 201516 201617 20171 TOTAL
RDA-2001 TAB)650) $3,504,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,504,000
RDA-2004 TAB)660) $11,684,000 $0 $0 $0 50 $0 $11,684,000 ,
Transportation Fund)124) 5407,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $407,000
Unfunded So $o $0 54,630,000 $0 $0 $4,630,000 '
Total Costs: $15,595,000 $0 $o $4,630.000 5o $0 $20,225,000
Impact on operations: This project adds one mile of additional landscape maintenance costs along Foothill Blvd,as well as some additional
street lights Into SLD 1.
J-12 '
' 1L Key: 1847
Hellman Avenue at Metrolink Tracks -Widen Crossing
Project Location: L+
Hellman Avenue at Metrolink Q� 9TH ST. Ute®
' Tracks
0
}
W CITY YARD
ILI L��-
Est.Construction Start/End: Z
' 01/2014-05/2014
Project status: 8TH ST. ] ETROLINK
Q
' Design and Construction TRACK
PROJECT L TION
Q
Department:
Engineering J
7TH ST.
Project Manager:
' Romeo David
Description: Construction of traffic signal and widen the road at the Metrolink tracks.
Justification: This project will improve the flow of traffic,circulation and pedestrian safety due to a new traffic signal,wider road and sidewalks.
Protect Cost Estimate($):
' Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2013/1 2014115 2015/16 2016117 2017/1 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 50 $0 $0
' Design/Plan Review $0 $0 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $50,000
Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $0 $659,000 $0 $0 $0 $659,000
' Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $15,600 $0 $0 $0 $15,600
Contingency $0 $0 $65,400 $o So $0 $65,400
Total Costs: $0 $0 $790,000 $0 $0 $0 $790,000
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 2013/14 2014115 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 TOTAL
Unknown $0 % $790,000 $0 $0 $0 $790,000
Total Costs: $0 $0 $790,000 $0 $0 $0 $790,000
' Impact on Operations: The City will be responsible to pay for the cost of electricity and maintenance. The estimated cost of electricity and
maintenance for a traffic signal is$2,500 per year. In addition,the street widening,sidewalks and new pavement
will mean less routine maintenance like pothole repairs, weed abatement and crack seal, thus freeing up
' maintenance crews to attend to other needed areas.
' J-13
JL Ivey: '
Hermosa Park - Light Pole Replacements
LLI
Project Location: Li Li > '
ANYM
Hermosa Park eMENT
6787 Hermosa Avenue
N '
TO o � �
��
Est.Construction Start/End:
08/2013-06/2014 p T
ST �
Project Status: 19TH [�
Requested FY 2013-2014 '
Q v,awK c
Department: w
Public Works Services FLEE
�CJ V
O
0
Project Manager: EO
Dean Rodia
Description: Remove and replace existing park light poles and conduit.
Justification: Safety-the existing light poles are rotting. Several light poles have already fallen over. Likewise,the electrical wiring and conduit
need to be replaced. Hermosa Park has gone dark several times when the electrical system suddenly failed.
Project Cost Estimate(SI:
Expenditure/Category Prior years 2013/14 2014/15 2015/1 2016/17 TBD TOTAL ,
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design/Plan Review $0 $0 $D $0 $0 $0 $0 '
Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $25,000 $25,000
Inspection&Administration $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $o $0 '
Contingency $o so $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Costs: $o $0 $0 $0 $o $25,000 $25,000 '
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 2013/1 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 TBD TOTAL
LIVID 1 General City(130) $o $0 $0 $0 $0 $25,000 $25,000
Total Costs: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $25,000 $25,000
Impact on Operations: With new park light poles and conduit,the constant and significant demands for maintenance at Hermosa Park will '
be greatly reduced.
1
J-14 ,
A Key.
Lions Park East Community Center - Replace Flooring
PmJe
Lions arkLocation:stC �i L-iLJU C
Lions Park East Community Center U -;i 7 � ��J �. �JUL�- -
' 9163 Base Line Road LJ�U ILL
�—r
0000 Q o r�
� a c
Est Construction Start/End: j O S
' 08/2013-05/2014 LJ �
RED L
HILL
Protect Status: MUN
PARK
' Requested FY 2013-2014 /11
n aLL
Department: QLl Lim c
Public Works Services � �L� ,`J�I II�IIIII II(I�III rN §11II�1III 11Project Manager: r��,�l Irk -, f�I rL
' Ty Quaintance
Description: Replace existing VCT flooring tiles in Lions East Community Center. Flooring tiles will be replaced on a room by room basis
' depending on available funds.
lustifiwtion: The existing floor tiles are cracked and brittle and need to be replaced.
' Project Cost Estimate($):
' Expenditure/Cateeory Prior years 2013/1 2014115 2015/1 2016/1 2017/18 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $o $o $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
' Design/Plan Review $5,000 $0 $o $o $0 $0 $5,000
Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 50 $0
Construction $0 $0 $60,000 $0 So $0 $60,000
' Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $0 50 5o So 5o
Contingency $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Costs: $5,000 $0 $601000 50 $0 $0 $65,000
' Project Funding:
' Funding:source Prior years 2013 Y4 2014/15 2015/1 2016/17 2017 18 TOTAL
Capital Reserve(025) $o $0 $60.000 $0 $0 $o $60,000
Total Costs: $0 $0 $60,000 50 $0 $o $60,000
Impact on Operations: The new floor tiles will require less maintenance.
1
t J-15
JL Key: 1551 '
LIVID 1 Trail - Concrete Drainage Improvement
Project Location: '
Various locations in LM 1.
Est.Construction Start/End:
08/2013-03/2014 )
Project Status:
Requested FY 2013-2014
Department:
Public Works Services
Project Manager: ®= PROJECT LOCATI
Dean Rodia �-
Description: Project includes the installation of 158 linear feet of water deflector ban at 4 orations and 320 square feet of concrete slab at 1
location along several communtiy trails in LIVID 1. t
Justification: This project will Improve drainage,prevent costly and hazardous trail washouts,and improve public safety.
Project Cost Estimate($): '
Expenditure/Category Prior years 2013/14 2014115 2015/1 201611 2017/1 TOTAL '
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 50 $0 $0
Design/Plan Review $0 $0 $o 50 $0 50 $o '
Right-of-Way $0 $o $0 So $0 $0 $o
Construction $98,530 $0 $19,100 $0 $0 $0 $117,630
Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 so $0 $0 '
Contingency $o $0 $0 $0 So $0 So
Total Costs: $98,530 $0 $19,100 $0 $0 $0 $117,630 '
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior years 2013/14 2014/15 2015/1 2016117 2017118 TOTAL '
Beautification(110) $98,530 $0 $19,100 $0 $0 $0 $117,630
Total Costs: $98,530 $0 $19,100 $0 $o $0 $117,630
Impact on Operations: This project will reduce the ongoing maintenance costs of the LIVID 1 community trail system. '
1
J-16 '
' JL Key: 1787
LMD 4R - Water Conservation and Landscape Renovations
tProject Location:
LMD 4R
I I
Est.Construction Start/End: eT I
02/2014-05/2014
Project Status: _ 04Ili
Design 1 I
t
SCALE NONE
9
Department:
' Engineering PROJECT
( LOCATION
Project Manager: IPFIT� F
' Curt Billings
Description: Second phase of a multi-phased landscape retrofit forimproved water conservation.
1
Justification: This project will replace high maintenance turf areas in the existing LMD 4R landscaping with more efficient drought tolerant
shrubs and hardscape.This retrofit project will improve compliance with the City's current water conservation policy.
' Project Cost Estimate(Sj:
' Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2013/14 2014/15 2015/1 2026/17 TBD TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 50 $0 $0 $0
t Design/Plan Review $0 $0 $0 W $0 $0 50
Right-of-Way $0 $0 00 50 $0 $0 $0
Construction $355,000 $0 $355,000 5355,000 50 $0 $1,065,000
'
Inspection&Administration $10,000 $0 $10,000 $10,000 $0 $0 $30,000
Contingency $35,000 $0 $35,000 $35,000 50 $0 $105,000
' Total Costs: $400,000 50 $400,000 $400,000 $0 $0 $1,200.000
Project Funding:
' Funding Source Prior Years 2013/1 2014/15 2015/1 2016117 2017/18 TOTAL
LMD 4R(134) $400,000 50 5400,000 $400,000 so 0 $1,200,000
Total Costs: $400,000 50 5400,000 5100.000 50 $0 $1,200,000
' Impact on Operations: This project will reduce landscape maintenace costs for LMD 4R.
' J-17
A Key. 1843 '
Milliken Avenue at Mountain View Drive - Upgrade Traffic Signal Left Turn Phases
Project Location: ,
Milliken Avenue at Mountain View _
Drive
R_AEIFIC�LECTRT$AIL = — _
VALENCIA AVE
CE N T e A L® 'E -'
BASE LINE RD r w a x
_ � r
Est.Construction Start/End: W
Tom: a -
01/2014-04/2014 - _ - - — TERRA Vim "
O
R '
Project Status: 8T - MOUtJTPIN �j li%O _
Design '
- — PROJECT LOCATION
Department _ � CH
URC
H ST
Engineering - g '
FOOTHILL BLVD - wTro SCALE
Project Manager:
Jason Welday a
Description: The scope of work to be performed in general consists of,but is not limited to,removing protected-permissive left turn phasing
and replacing with protected left turn phasing on Milliken Avenue for the traffic signal at this location.
Justification: The project will improve safety for vehicles and pedestrians by providing an exclusive phase for left tum vehicle movements. In
addition, pedestrian crossings will occur separate from left tum movements, which previously occurred simultaneously with
protected-permissive traffic signal equipment. '
Project Cost Estimate(SI:
Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2013114 2014 15 2015/1 201611 2017/18 TOTAL '
Environmental/NPOES $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $0 I"
Design/Plan Review $0 $0 $1,000 so $0 $0 $1,000 '
Right-of-way $o $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $o $0 $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $20,000
Inspection&Administration - $0 $0 $2,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,000 '
Contingency $0 $0 $2,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,000
Total Costs: $o $0 $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $25,000 '
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 201314 201415 201516 201617 201718 TOTAL '
Transportation(124) $0 $0 $25,000 $0 $0 $0 525,000
Total Costs: $0 $0 $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $25,000
Impact on Operations: After installation and configuration of the protected left turn traffic signal equipment, no additional impacts on '
operations will be present.
J-18 ,
' .
Milliken Avenue at Terra Vista Parkway- Upgrade Traffic Signal Left Turn Phases 1L Key1844
' Project Location: P=EMEMProjecn Avenue at Terra Vista 'Parkway _
BASE LINE RD
Q '
Z LU
PKVyy
Est.Construction Start/End: _ TEl VVSTP, _ _ U
' 01/2014-04/2014
%-- PROJECT LOCATION
Project Status: Y
Design
J
J_
T
Department: GI-1URGH S
' Engineering
FOOTHILL BLVD NOT TO SCALE
Jason Welda
Project Manager:
— — _ - - - - _ -- - - — ---
' Y
Description: The scope of work to be performed in general consists of,but is not limited to,removing protected-permissive left turn phasing
and replacing with protected left turn phasing on Milliken Avenue for the traffic signal at this location.
Justification: The project will improve safety for vehicles and pedestrians by providing an exclusive phase for left turn vehicle movements.in
addition, pedestrian crossings will occur separate from left turn movements, which previously occurred simultaneously with
protected-permissive traffic signal equipment.
Project Cost Estimate
to(SI'
' Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2013114 2014/15 2015/1 2016/1 201711 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES 50 W $0 $0 50 $0 $o
Desi n/Plan Review $D $0 $1000 $0 50 1000
B So 5 ,
Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
t Construction $0 s0 $20,000 $0 W $0 $20,000
Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $2,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,000
Contingency s0 $0 $2,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,000
Total Costs: $0 $D $25,000 $o $D $D $25,000
Project Funding:
' Funding Source Prior Years 201311 2014/15 2015 16 2016/1 2017/1 IM
Transportation(124) so $o $25,0D0 $0 So $0 $25,000
Total Coats: 50 $o $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $25,000
Impact on operations: After installation and configuration of the protected left tum traffic signal equipment, no additional impacts on
operations will be present.
' J-19
JL Key: 1253 '
Milliken Avenue at Vintage Drive - Upgrade Traffic Signal Left Turn Phases
Project Location: WILSON AVE '
Milliken Avenue at Vintage Drive — - -- -- W
Q>
Q Q �
Q NOT TO SCALE -- LLI
Z
2 Y t=1
BANYAN ST
Est Construction Start/End: __�_ - X
01/2014-04/2014 = Q PROJECT LOCATION '
Project Status: -- _ VINTAGE
Design
Department:
Engineering
Project Manager.
Jason Welday
1
Description: The scope of work to be performed in general consists of,but is not limited to,removing protected-permissive left turn phasing
and replacing with protected left turn phasing on Milliken Avenue for the traffic signal at this location.
Justification: The project will improve safety for vehicles and pedestrians by providing an exclusive phase for left turn vehicle movements. In
addition, pedestrian crossings will occur separate from left turn movements, which previously occurred simultaneously with
protected-permissive traffic signal equipment. '
Project Cost Estimate I$):
Expenditure/Category renditure/Cate)oryory Prior Years 201314 201415 201516 201617 201718 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $o
Design/Plan Review $0 $0 53,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,000 '
Right-of-Way $0 $0 s0 $0 $0 $0 $D
Construction $0 $0 $20,000 $0 $0 $0 S20,000
Inspection&Administration $o $0 $2,000 $0 $D So 52,000 '
Contingency so 50 $2,000 $0 so 5o $2,000
Total Costs: $0 $0 $25,000 $0 $0 50 $2S,000
Project Funding: '
Funding Source Prior Years 2013/1 2014115 2015/1 2016/17 201711 TOTAL
Transportation(124) $0 $0 $25,000 $0 $0 $0 525,000
Total Costs: $0 $0 $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $25,001)
Impact on Operations: After installation and configuration of the protected left turn traffic signal equipment, no additional impacts on
operations will be present.
J-20 '
' A Key: 1775
Pacific Electric Trail Enhancements-West to East City Limits
Project Location:
Pacific Electric Trail from West City -
Limits to East City Limits
� f.T
1 Est.Construction Start/End: a
09/2014-12/2014
t LJ €
Project Status:
Design .. .�, f� = cV /'.
86
Department: n. P OJ ,J.Qw>j', -�
Engineering
' Project Manager:
Walt Stickney
' Description: This project includes the addition of various amenities along the trail. These amenities consist of replacing plaques and installing
- other trail improvements such as truncated domes at wheel chair ramps.
Justification: The trail from the west to east end was constructed in different phases,at different times,and by different contractors. Issues
have come up during the course of the last couple years by users of the trail that has prompted the need for this enhancement
' Project Cost Estimate($):
Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 TOTAL
' Environmental/NPDES $o $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Design/Plan Review $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $o $0
' Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $o $0 $0 $110pw $0 $110,000
Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $o $0
' Contingency $0 s0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Costs: $o $0 $0 $0 $110,000 $0 $110,000
' Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 201314 201415 201516 201617 201718 TOTAL
Beautification(110) $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000 $0 $10,000
City-wide Infrastructure Imp(198) $o $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $o $100,000
Total Costs: $0 $0 $0 $0 $110,000 $0 $110,000
' Impact on Operations: Minimal impact on operations
' J-21
JL Key: 1621 '
Red Hill Park - Pedestrian Paseo
Project Location: —
Red Hill Park7484 Vineyard Avenue o� ,
4.�5
. u
Est.Construction Start/End:
08/2012-11/2012 RED la ��u���❑��
HILL UUU
COUNTRY '
Project Status: CLUB
Design
Department:
Engineering
o
Project Manager: Qaa�aaaa
Walt Stickney �fI la� as �,= '
Description: Construction of a concrete sidewalk and lightsin the south west corner between Red Hill Park and Carnelian Avenue.
Justification: Adds a pedestrian access to Red Hill Park from Carnelian Avenue
Project cost Estimate(5):
Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2013/14 2014115 2015/1 2016/17 TBD TOTAL t
Environmental/NPDES 50 $0 SD $0 $0 $0 $0
Design/Plan Review $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,000 t
Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $90,000 $90,000
Inspection&Administration $o $0 $0 $0 $0 SO $0 ,
Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000 $10,000
Total Costs: $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $115,000 '
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Years 2013/14 2014115 2015/16 2016/17 TBD TOTAL ,
PD-85 Redemption(848) 5151000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,000
Unknown $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $100,000
Total Costs: $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $115,000 '
Impact on Operations: Minor impact.
1
J-22 '
1LKey. TRD
Upper Cucamonga Storm Drain Phase 3 - East of Hellman Ave to Base Line Rd to Roberds, North
on Amethyst to 19th St, and Easterly 300 feet
Project Location: _ - - --W` - --
East of Hellman Avenue along the
' north side of the Pacific Electric 19TH ST Q
Trail, along Base Line Road to
ROberds Street, north in Amethyst --
' Street to 19th street and easterly _ - r - _ w w
300 feet. r C (Q > >
N
z <
G
> it = z N
Est.Construction Start/End: - -- _ m .F 0
a
LU' 4/2015-11/2015 _ . LU �. MostEMTA tt w
Q -- _
Projectstatra: - -- - -- —_-_-
' Construction PROJECT LOCATION = PACIFIC ELECTRIC TRAIL
Department: -- — W
' '
Engineering Q
BASE LINE RD BASE LINE RD
ProjectManager. J
Romeo David Q
Description: Construct a Master Plan Storm Drain;install catch basins and manholes. In addition,Amethyst Street will be widened with curb&
' gutter and sidewalks where necessary and the entire streets within the storm drain limits will be resurfaced upon completion.
Justification: This project will improve drainage and extend pavement life,use,and rideability.Also,during rain events R will provide improved
pedestrian access along Amethyst Street which serves Aha Loma Elementary School. In addition,a FEMA Flood Zone Letter of
' Map Revision(LOMR)will be processed after completion removing the properties around the area from Zone A requiring
additional Rood insurance.
Project Cost Estimate(SI:
Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2013/1 2014/15 2015/1 201611 2017/1 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES $0 so s0 $0 50 s0 so
' Design/Plan Review 5o $0 s0 s0 50 s0 s0
Right-of-Way $0 $0 s0 so $0 $0 s0
Construction 50 s0 $3,500,000 $0 50 s0 53,500,000
Inspection&Administration $o $0 so so $0 $o $0
Contingency 50 $0 $40,00 s0 so s0 $400,000
' Total Costs: $o s0 $3,900,000 s0 $0 $0 $3,90,000
Project Funding:
' Funding Source Prior Years 201314 201415 201516 201617 201718 TOTAL
Unknown $0 $0 $3,90,00 $0 $0 so $3,90,00
' Total Costs: $0 $0 $3,900,000 50 $0 So $3,900,000
Impact on Operations: Elimination of storm water protection costs for placing sand bags and cleanup,and a reduction of street repair
maintenace costs for pothole and crack repairs,thus freeing up maintenance crews for other areas.
' J-23
JL Key: 1842 '
Various Intersections - Safety Light Upgrades
Project Location:
Foothill Boulevard at the SE LINE RD _. BASE LINE RD '
intersections ofVineyard Avenue, - oq
Archibald Avenue,and Haven RED
Avenue HILL -
MU ITr - --
PAR _
- _ = CHURCH S7
Est.Construction Start/End:
09/2013-11/2013
PROJECT LOCATION '
Project Status: _ --
Design - - _ - '
- -FOOTHILL BLVD
-88
Department: �a 5mic
Engineering -j Ca --- d t
u a2_a z
Project Manager: -- _ARROW i
uor ro sca�� - ROUTE _
Jason Welday -- - - - - -- - '
Description: The scope of work to be performed in general consists of, but is not limited to, installing additional safety fighting at existing
signalized intersections.
Justification: The project will improve safety for vehicles and pedestrians by enhancing the visibility at the intersection.
1
Project Cost Estimate ISj:
Expenditure/Catea oory Prior Years 2013/14 2014/15 2015/1 2016/17 2017/1 TOTAL
Environmental/NPDES 50 So So s0 $0 $o $0
Design/Plan Review $0 $0 $3,000 $0 So $0 $3,000 '
Right-of-Way $0 $o So $0 So $o $0
Construction % $0 5130,000 $0 So $0 5130,000
Inspection&Administration $0 50 $4,000 $0 $0 $0 $4,0110
Contingency $0 So $13,000 $0 So Sa $13,000
Total Costs: $0 $0 $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $150,000 t
Project Funding:
Funding Source Prior Year 201314 201415 201516 2016117 201718 TOTAL '
Transportation(124) $0 $0 $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $150,000
Total Costs: $0 $0 $1501000 $0 so $0 $150,000
Impact on Operations: The project will increase the cost for electrical service,and maintenance to replace lamps will occur approximately '
every 5 years.
1
J-24 ,
'
Windrows Park- Fire Lane Repair 1L Key:
' Project location: �a
Windrows Park
6849 victoria Park lane
PROJECT
Est.Construction Start/End: n LOCATIO
Unknown ILLQ
iAR
1 ARK
Project status:
Unfunded 0 /
Department:
_ F
' Public Works
Project Manager:
a
Tim Faulkner
' Description: Removal of the existing "Turf Block"fire lane and replacing it with poured concrete. The fire lane is accessed from Bougainvilla
Way.
' Justification: This Fire lane serves as pedestrian and emergency services access to the Park as well as the adjacent elementary school.It was
constructed In the 1980s and over the past 20 years has become extremely uneven due to adjacent tree roots pushing up the turf
block. Replacement with poured concrete should prevent further damage and mitigate the existing trip hazards.
1
Project Cost Estimate I51:
' Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2013/14 2014/15 2015/1 2016117 2017/18
T
Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 $0
' Design/Plan Review $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 $0
Right-of-Way So $0 so $0 $o so s0
Construction so s0 $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $30,000
' Inspection&Administration s0 s0 s0 $0 $0 s0 so
Contingency so $0 so $o $0 $0 s0
' Total Costs: $0 $0 $30.000 $0 $0 so $30.000
Project Funding:
' Funding Source Prior Years 201314 20141 201516 2016/17 201718 roru
Unfunded $0 $0 $30,000 so so $0 $30,000
Total Costs: $0 $0 $30,000 so so so $30,000
Impact on Operations: The project will be coordinated with The Windrows Elementary School,the Community Services Department and
the Fire District so that all are aware of the timing and the lark of access for the construction period. With the
' paving of this path,maintenance cost would be reduced.
' J-25
i
1 GENERAL PLAN
1 POLICIES
1
1
1
1
1
1
i RANCHO
CUCAMONGA
1
1
1
i CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
1 FISCAL YEAR 2013/2014
1
1
1
1
i
i
1
1
i BEAUTIFICATION
1
i
1
1
1
1
1
i
1
1
i
1
Action
Ty rie a
General Pian Policy
- o. u
c
T ° _ o
1
oo � D
eg Implementation Action(s) E a uai o
IL a m a rn W a`
Implement the Bicycle Plan pursuant to Figure CM-8. Update the City's
Bicycle Circulation Plan in a format suitable for obtaining public funding.
Develop the planning, implementation, and design details of the bicycle
' facility and amenity elements of the Community Mobility Chapter,
including the setting of implementation priorities and the identification of
both capital and operating funding sources. Implementation should
focus on adding a north-south trail along either Deer Creek or
' Cucamonga Creek as a first priority.
Update the City's Trails Implementation Plan to maintain consistency A. D,
with the General Plan. ENG PL E F 1 4
Review City ordinances to ensure that an adequate mechanism exists to
manage the use of trails only by authorized categories of users.
Implementation of the Bicycle Plan may require traffic signalization at the
crossing of bike paths with arterial roadways to facilitate the safe
' crossing of those arterials by bicyclists and pedestrians. Signals should
be convenient to bicyclists with accessible push-buttons to activate the
signal. Provide traffic control push button devices at convenient
locations for bicyclists at signalized intersections on the identified Bicycle
' Network.
CM-3.8 O O Continue to encourage the provision of bicycle facilities, such as
bicycle lockers and secure bike parking,throughout the City.
' Identify existing locations where bicycle lockers and secure bicycle
parking could be provided at key locations throughout put the City, and
develop a funding and implementation plan.
' Encourage/require the provision of bicycle lockers and secure bike
parking for major development projects, as defined in the Development PL ENG A' D. 4
Code. E, F. H
Modify the Development Code to require provision of bicycle parking
spaces, bicycle lockers,and, as appropriate,showers for bicycle riders at
new buildings providing significant employment, at transit stations, in the
commercial districts, and at recreational destinations in the City.
Identify and implement a dedicated funding source for
CM-3.9 O implementation and completion of the Bicycle Network as identified
in the Bicycle Plan.
' Same action as identified for CM-3.7. ENG E, F 4
CM- O Continue to complete the installation of sidewalks and require new
3.10 development to provide sidewalks.
Use the CIP to identify a schedule for installing new and replacement
sidewalks throughout the City, placing priority on installing missing ENG B' C' 4
sidewalks near schools and activity centers,and replacing sidewalks that D,
thave been identified as hazardous to public safety.
' Appendix A:Implementation Plan
A-24 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN
1
1
Amon L
TV pe a
' d General Plan Policy 0 _ m
E ; ' ain L �'
'o
o a L
c Implementation Action(s) C `o_
Q. a rn a w K u. IL
' CM-11 Continue to provide pedestrian amenities on sidewalks on major
3 O streets that are key pedestrian routes, including the provision of
benches,shade trees,and trash cans.
t Identify key pedestrian travel corridors citywide, and prepare a Citywide
Pedestrian Circulation Study to determine pedestrian amenity needs,
capital and operating funding sources, and a phased implementation
program. Develop a program for gradually installing public amenities A B
such as streetlights, benches, trash containers, art, drinking fountains, ENG PL C D 5
' landscaping, etc. that will enhance the pedestrian environment and
encourage increased use of transit. Use both the CIP process and other
funding sources, including a program whereby businesses dr residents
may sponsor street furniture and/or landscaped areas.
CM- Continue to require that the siring and architectural design of new
312 O development promote safety, pedestrian-friendly design, and
access to transit facilities.
' Develop standards to be applied to development projects along transit PL ENG I 4
corridors that require transit and pedestrian accessibility.
' Establish a number of bike hubs in the City (centralized locations
CM- O with convenient bike parking for trip destinations or transfer to
3.13 other transportation modes), at key transit nodes, and at
commercial nodes.
Conduct a study to determine the best locations for bike hubs in the City,
and develop a plan,wayfinding program, and implementation process for ENG PL, RD A. B, 4
providing bike hubs that provide secure bicycle lockers, bike racks, and C, D
' connections to transit at key locations in the City.
CM- O Enhance pedestrian and bicycle access to local and regional
3.14 transit,including facilitating connections to transit
' Same action as identified for CM-3.7. ENG PL 1 4
CM- Coordinate the provision of the non-motorized networks (bicycle
3.15 O and pedestrian) with adjacent jurisdictions to maximize sub- z
regional connectivity.
Same action as identified for CM-3.7. ENG PL A, E, F 4
' CM- O Establish fixed-route local circulator bus service connecting major
3.16 activity centers.
Explore development of a fixed-route local circulator bus system, station ENG PL A. E, H 5
location, and funding mechanisms.
' Continue to implement traffic management and traffic signal
CM-4.1 O operations measures along the arterial roadway to minimize delay
and congestion for all modes, without adversely impacting transit,
' bicycles,and pedestrians.
Appendix A:Implementation Plan
A25
RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN
Action '
Te `•a , x
' 3 o General Plan Policy. l , ate" ; c
w
K N
Ix
O O S A
eo n Implementation Action(s) E c o
Q. Q. N a N e-' v_ a`
' PL,AS, A, B,
Same actions as identified for RC-4.1 to RC-4.5. ENG ENG, C, E, 3
CM, BS, G,
PW, FIN
' Encourage development of transit-oriented and infill development,
PS-12.3 O and encourage a mix of uses that foster walking and alternative
transportation.
Same action as identified for RC-4.4. PL ENG A, 1 3
Provide enhanced bicycling and walking infrastructure,and support
PS-12.4 O public transit, including public bus service, the Metrolink, and the
potential for Bus Rapid Transit(BRT).
Same action as identified for RC-4.4. PL ENG A. 1 3
Provide green building incentives, assess green building
techniques as a formal stage of project review,and develop a green
' PS-12.5 O building ordinance or program that addresses both new and
existing buildings.Adaptation strategies will also include increased
water efficiency in buildings.
' Same actions as identified for RC-6.1 to RC-6.4 PL ENG A, I, K 4
Encourage efforts to reduce waste generation and re-use and
PS-12.6 O support increased recycling and composting opportunities with a
focus on large commercial and industrial waste producers.
Same action as identified for PF-7.1. ENG PL A 3
PS-12.7 O O Support tree planting, planting more vegetation (including native
and drought-resistant planting),and preservation of open space.
Same actions as identified for RC-1.1, RC-8.1 to RC-8.7. PL PW A, 1 4
' PS-12.8 O Develop green procurement plans and ensure energy savings in
City operations and maintenance.
Same actions as identified for RC-5.1 to RC-5.3. AS CM, FIN, A,B, C,PW E, K 4
Develop energy- or climate change-themed publications and
workshops,facilitating energy audits for residents,and establishing
PS-12.9 O partnerships to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Increase public
awareness about climate change, and encourage residents and
businesses to become involved in activities and lifestyle changes
that help reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
Same action as identified for RC-5.1. CM ENG A, K 4
Consider the compatibility of proposed land uses with the noise
environment when preparing or revising community and/or specific
PS-13.1 O plans and when reviewing development proposals. The contour
map depicting future noise levels (Figure PS-10)should be used by
the City as a guide to land use/noise compatibility.
Appendix A:Implementation Plan
A57
RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN
w
A
� � ■�■� � � � � r � � � r � r � � � r �
1
' Action
Ty De a
' d m General Plan Policy c v
>u m g m
d K C C N H
N O O C
T
2 c .� Implementation Action(s) E a w c o
Q_ a` w a in rY a a
' Complete intersection capacity improvements, coordinate traffic signals
utilizing Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS), and improve striping
and signage. Striping shall maximize room for bike lanes where feasible
and consistent with the Bicycle Plan. Modernize traffic signal equipment
as necessary, and continue to update traffic signal timing and ENG PW A, D 3
synchronization plans to optimize traffic flow along the key arterial
corridors, taking into account the needs of transit, bicyclists, and
pedestrians as well. Invest in the communications infrastructure
' necessary to operate a Citywide traffic signal control system.
Continue to design and operate arterials and intersections for the
CM-4.2 O safe operation of all modes, including transit, bicyclists, and
pedestrians.
Same action as identified for CM-4.1, ENG A, D 3
CM-4.3 O Continue to implement Intelligent Transportation System Measures
and advanced traffic management technologies where appropriate.
Same action as identified for CM-4.1. ENG PW E, D' 3
' Maintain the City's transportation infrastructure in good condition;
CM-4A O O develop and maintain adequate funding sources for it's ongoing
maintenance and upkeep.
' Continue to implement and follow the schedule for resurfacing streets ENG A, D, 4
and streets improvements per the CIP. E, F
' Continue to require that new development participates in the cost of _
CM-5.1 O transportation mitigation and improvements necessitated by new
development,including non-automobile solutions.
Require payment of Traffic Impact Fees as approved by the City Council,
used to finance specific improvements made necessary by new
development. The relationship between the fees, the cost of the ENG PL D 4
improvements, and new development has been established in fee
' analyses approved by the City Council. These fees shall be reviewed
from time to time and adjusted as needed.
Require evaluation of potential traffic and transportation impacts
CM-5.2 O associated with new development prior to project approval, and
' require adequate mitigation measures, including non-automobile
solutions,prior to,or concurrent with,project development.
Require applicants to prepare traffic and transportation impact
t assessments consistent with adopted City guidelines and standards.
Continue to require sidewalks, pedestrian paths, and connections to be ENG D 4
provided as part of new development projects to improve and enhance
access between neighborhoods, and from neighborhoods to schools,
Iparks,trails, commercial centers, and other activity centers.
Appendix A:Implementation Plan
A-26 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN
1
m
W
FSI
MSI
M-�
w
rr r r r■ r r r �r r r r� r r r r �r r r r
' Action
Type a
u v General Plan Policy c a,
U
� d � 6
`w K c a N
u A 0 0 C '
o Implementation Action(s) Ea m ,`o_
a. a N a` m a`
Expand recreation and cultural attractions to enhance
ED-2.3 O tourism/visitor potential and to boost sales and transient
occupancy tax.
' Develop brochures or links from the City's web site to showcase the
various recreational and cultural venues to attract visitors to the City.
Enhancement of cultural amenities, including regional entertainment RD CS A 7
options, recreation, and historic preservation, will help to embellish the
City's reputation as a destination for a wide range of visitors.
Expand lodging choices In the City through the recruitment and
ED-2.4 O placement of full-service hotels that will complement the existing
select-service hotel portfolio. -
Review and update marketing strategies (land surveys, infrastructure
availability, and modes of transportation)to solicit the development of a RD PL A,G 4
' full-service lodging facility. Make sure that zoning regulations can
accommodate a full-service hotel at desired locations.
ED-3.1 O O Continue to make public safety a priority.
Use the annual budgeting process to allocate funding for public safety
services, equipment, and facilities commensurate with the City's service CM PD, FD A 6
objectives.
ED-3.2 O Provide community and cultural amenities.
Same action as identified for ED-2.3. CS CM, RD A 4
' ED-3.3 O Maintain a healthy fiscal balance.
Use the annual budgeting process to check that revenues from all CM AS, FIN A, G 1
sources continue to more than match projected spending.
ED-3.4 O O Improve internal circulation for all modes of transportation,
consistent with the concept of"Complete Streets".
Same action as identified for LU-3.1 to 3.8. ENG PL A, G' 4
' ED-3.5 O Facilitate development of additional local and regional
entertainment venues.
1 Focus a special economic development team on the task of working
towards attracting developers and investors interested in responding to RD PL A. G 6
local and regional demand for new entertainment options.
' ED-3.6 O Leverage the City's quality of life amenities to attract more
knowledge-based workers.
Expand the Economic Development Strategy to market Rancho
' Cucamonga's civic assets, including parks, recreation and community RD PL, CS A. G 4
enrichment facilities and programs,trails,and quality school districts.
' Appendix A:Implementation Plan
A-30 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN
1
Action
Ty pe a
' aGeneral Plan Policy c
U
C d - 6
d > S — O
w m as 0
=
0
C
O
T
c o a Implementation Action(s) o
o. a N a` y LL a
' RC-8.7 O O Support protection of natural habitat areas for ecological,
educational,and other scientific study purposes.
Same action as identified for RC-8.3. PL ENG A, 1 4
'
PF-1.1 O Continue to implement high-quality standards for new public
facilities and improvements to existing buildings.
Design and build all City buildings to serve as a model for quality
architectural treatment and green building design in all new and PL ENG A, B,C 5
remodeled civic facilities.
PF-1.2 O Promote community facilities as focal points for gatherings,events,
and celebrations. -,y- .y
Maintain all public facilities and buildings to address the needs of the
various neighborhoods within the City. Advertise the availability of civic PW CS, LIB A, B. C 3
facilities to community groups.
' PF-1.3 O Locate new community facilities in neighborhoods and centers
where they will serve populations with the greatest needs. _
Review and assess the needs for the location of community facilities as CS ENG, PL A 6
neighborhoods evolve.
PF-1.4 O O Maintain public facilities and optimize their usefulness during their
lifespan.
Continue with proper maintenance programming and funding levels for PW CS, LIB, A, B, C 4
existing public facilities. AC
PF-1.5 O O Continue to incorporate low-maintenance features into public
facilities consistent with the City's sustainability plan.
Replace features of public facilities with lower maintenance types as part PW PL, CS, A, B, C 3
of the on-going maintenance program. BS
1 PF-1.6 O Maintain multi-functional, flexible, and complementary space at
community facilities.
Same action as identified for PF-1.2. CS PW A, B, C 3
Maximize public facility use by sharing with nonprofit
organizations, school districts, and community organizations. Look
PF-1.7 O for opportunities to create joint-use community space at facilities
owned by private organizations such as faith-based groups and
service clubs.
Same action as identified for CS-2.5. CS A 4
Consult with local school districts to enhance the development of
PF-2.1 O O joint-use agreements, allowing for optimum use of school facilities,
to provide broad community benefits such as public safety and
education.
Continue and expand joint use of facilities to achieve even greater CS SD A. K 5
optimization of school facilities to service the entire community.
Appendix A:Implementation Plan
A-44 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN
1
W
w
I--1
1
tAction Z'
Tv pe z
' General Plan Policy c. `
e �
A N
a d d
a E K C N N
W Z
ec a Implementation Action(s) ,E� `o_
a a w a to X LL 0.
' Continue to provide a safe and efficient street system in the City,to •_ _
CM-1.1 O support mobility goals, all transportation modes, and the goals of
Managing the Land Use, Community Design, and Historic
Resources Chapter.
' Add the intersection improvements listed below to the Capital
Improvement Program (CIP) or appropriate equivalents identified and
approved by the City Engineer in the future that would offset the
identified impacts; implement the improvements as funding becomes
available. Prepare a report on the need for the improvements and their
relationship to the impacts caused by new development in Rancho
Cucamonga.
Work with Caltrans and SANBAG to implement a new freeway
interchange at 1-15 and Arrow Highway.
• Complete Wilson Avenue between Milliken Avenue and Day
Creek Boulevard. ENG A, D, 1 7
Complete Rochester Avenue between Banyan Street and
Wilson Avenue.
• Pursue Federal funds for a grade separation of the SPRR at
Etiwanda Avenue.
' Complete storm drain and widening of Hellman Avenue from
Foothill Boulevard to Cucamonga Creek.
Complete Wilson Avenue from East Avenue to Wardman
Bullock.
Improve the Base Line Road at 1-15 Freeway Interchange.
• Complete Youngs Canyon from Cherry Avenue to Banyan
Street.
Provide an integrated network of roadways that provides for
CM-1.2 O convenient automobile, transit, bicycle, and pedestrian circulation
movement around the City.
I Same actions as identified for CM-2 1 and CM-3 7 ENG i PL A D 1 4
Completethe circulation system by constructing new roadway
CM-1.3 O facilities and freeway interchanges pursuant to the Circulation Plan
(Figure CM-2).
Identify in the CIP future projects and new roadways based on available ENG PL A. D, a
funding.
CM-1.4 O O Provide access for seniors and those with physical disabilities in all
elements of the transportation system.
Continue to operate the Silver Fox Express. Consult with Omnitrans
regarding providing ACCESS transportation services. ENG CS A, E. 4
Require that all new future transportation facilities have appropriate and F, H, I
adequate access for seniors and people with physical disabilities.
Appendix A:Implementation Plan A_19
RANCHO CUCAMONGA G E NERAL PLAN
1
Action
TY De a
' m y General Plan Policy
v
i m a o
d c a in
d C y
'r w v Implementation Action(s) E n w 'c o
o 'o a ❑ m o T
a a` w a` yr tt LL o.
Implement street design standards per this General Plan, except
that modified standards may be applied where appropriate on
CM-1.5 O arterial corridors relating to transit, bicycle facilities, sidewalks,and
on-street parking to be context sensitive to adjacent land uses and
districts, and to all roadway users, including transit, bicycles, and
pedestrians.
Integrate into the CIP process the planning of modified standards for
Foothill Boulevard to accommodate BRT and for other arterials as ENG PL A, D, 1 4
appropriate to reflect the bikeway plan and pedestrian improvements
necessary to support Mixed Use districts.
CM-1.6 O Pursue a railroad grade separation at Etiwanda Avenue and the
BNSF Railway line.
Grade separations currently exist at Haven and Milliken Avenues. Due to
truck traffic associated with the southeast industrial area, the City ENG PL A, E, 1 4
supports creating a railroad grade separation at Etiwanda Avenue and
the BNSF Railway line
' CM-2.1 O O Facilitate bicycling and walking citywide. ?+q
Implement the Bicycle Master Plan included in the Community Mobility
Chapter.
' Require that pedestrian facilities and connections be provided as part of
all development projects, with an emphasis on connections within Mixed
Use districts. Implement all bicycling and walking policies and Mobility ENG PL, RD A, D, 1 4
Element components.
Preparation and distribute bike route maps and bike facilities information.
Publish and make readily available pedestrian route maps and
pedestrian facilities information.
Encourage all feasible measures to reduce total vehicle miles
CM-2.2 O traveled by automobiles, Including enhanced transit access and
land use approaches that provide compact and focused
' development along major transit corridors.
Same actions as identified for LU-2.1, LU-5.4, LU-5.6, and CM-2.1. ENG PL A, D, 1 4
CM-2.3 O Support the use of hybrid,electric,and low/zero emission vehicles.
tContinue to maintain the Green Team Sustainability Action Matrix that
identifies current and proposed efforts that procure vehicles that includes
providing gas-efficient vehicles. CM PL,AS' A, E, F 7
' Amend the Development Code as appropriate to accommodate
alternative fuel service stations and charging facilities.
CM-2.4 O Replace City vehicles with energy-efFlclent and alternative fuel
source models when replacing vehicles or adding to the City's fleet.
Appendix A:Implementation Plan
A-20 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN
Action L
TV pe Z
d m General Plan Policy c m
in
m
u m m o o
o c Implementation Action(s) E
IQ, ? ? .0
' a a rn a rn K u. a
Explore the Feasibility of Extending Local Transit Service
1 Explore the possibility of extending to adjacent jurisdictions in
cooperation with such jurisdictions who could also participate in funding,
if beneficial to the City.
Work with Regional Transit Operators(Omnitrans)
t Develop the optimum coordination and integration of bus transit services
between the local City circulator system and the regional service.
Consult with Omnitrans to establish and maintain transit hubs at
CM-3.4 O Victoria Gardens, Chaffey College, the Metrolink Station, and other
locations as appropriate to facilitate use of transit and transfers
between transit services.
Same action as identified for CM-3.1. ENG PL A 4
Consider and evaluate the possible relocation of the Metrolink
CM-3.5 O Station to Haven Avenue to provide improved connections to transit
and to support planned transit-oriented land uses along Haven
Avenue.
Work with Metrolink and Southern California Regional Rail Authority
(SCRRA)to study the feasibility of moving the Metrolink Station from its ENG,
current location to Haven Avenue. Explore options for alternative funding PL RD E, F 6
from sources other than the General Fund, such as grants, and
' specifically grants that promote transit-oriented development.
In addition to requiring private development to provide transit
amenities, consult with regional transit operators to provide
CM-3.6 O attractive and convenient bus stops, including shade/weather
protection, seats, transit information, and bus shelters as
appropriate.
Same action as identified for CM-3.1. Also, develop a program, with
identified funding sources, for providing amenities at bus stops in the ENG PL D 4
City.
Continue to develop and maintain a citywide bicycle network of off-
street bike paths, on-street bike lanes, and bike streets to provide
CM-3.7 O O connections between neighborhoods, schools, parks, civic
centerifacilities, recreational facilities, and major commercial
centers.
i
t
1
' Appendix A:Implementation Plan
R A N C H 0 CUCAMONGA G E N E RAL PLAN A-23
Action D
Ty pe s
t m d General Plan Policy W
U
W y
a lz N
N
2T V W O O L'
.o Q Y Implementation Action(s) E a w c o
3 � m
a`
Strategize with Foundation members to increase the range of CS A. H
involvement in Foundation events.
Provide a comprehensive, interconnected off-road trail system that
' CS-6.1 O provides alternative mobility choices throughout the entire City and
increases connectivity.
Continue to implement the principles of the Trails Implementation Plan. PL CS ENG A, 1 4
' Connect trails in Rancho Cucamonga to trails in the San Bernardino
CS-6.2 O National Forest and other hillside open space areas. These trails
shall include trailheads with vehicle parking and other amenities.
' Coordinate with Federal and State agencies to facilitate funding and CS
acquisition of trail connections from the City to the San Bernardino PL ENG A 5
National Forest. Connect new trails with the North Etiwanda Preserve.
t CS-6.3 O Continue to Incorporate, where feasible, regional and community
trails along utility corridors and drainage channels.
Continue to make trail connections within the City on existing public- PL CS' A 5
agency owned properties. ENG
Continue to maintain and pursue the development of planned trails
' CS-6.4 O and facilities for equestrian use within the Equestrian/Rural Area
designation.
Continue to ensure that trails accommodate equestrian users through
details outlined in the Trails Implementation Plan within north Alta Loma PL ENG C,B 4
' and Etiwanda.
Improve existing trails by removing barriers, applying sustainability
CS-6.5 O concepts, improving safety and function, and providing access to
adjacent trails.
Continue to program funding into the CIP for the improvements to ENG PL, BS A 4
deficient equestrian trails, as outlined in the Trails Implementation Plan.
Require new development to provide access to adjacent trails and
CS-6.6 O provide appropriate trail amenities (e.g., benches, drinking
fountains, hitching posts, bike stands, and other amenities) for all
new projects located adjacent to regional or community trails.
Require new development projects adjacent to Regional or Community PL ENG A, K 4
Trails to provide access to and amenities for trails.
' CS-6.7 O Continue to credit publically accessible trailway acreage towards
meeting parkland dedication standards.
Continue to allow parkland credit for trails within development projects, PL ENG A, K 4
subject to adopted criteria.
Appendix A:Implementation Plan
A-36 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN
Action A
Ty pe a
d d General Plan Policy _ y
B S m
m d a m rn•— o
aj, u mo o C
a° a rn Implementation Action(s) a` U=) ' a
Develop a listing of acceptable fire-resistant plant types to be PW'
incorporated into new and rehabilitated development sites. PL ENG, A 3
FD
Encourage streetscape design and landscaping programs for
ILIA 0.4 O commercial frontages that create vibrant places which support
walking,bicycling,transit,and sustainable economic development.
Same action as identified for LU-3.4. PL ERNOG, A 4
Consult with and coordinate with the Santa Fe Railway to develop
LU-10.5 O and install a landscape plan for the enhancement of the railroad
right-of-way.
Inventory and assess the landscaping needs of the rail corridor, and PL ENG, A 6
consult with the rail agency to develop a plan. RD
' Continue to pursue strategies to reduce long-term operation and
LU-10.6 O maintenance costs within the City's Landscape Maintenance
Districts and other publicly funded areas.
Inventory and prioritize the removal of turf areas within landscape
' medians to be replaced with plantings that reduce long-term operations PW ENG A 5
and maintenance costs.
Continue to implement and update as necessary the City's Sign
LU-11.1 O O Ordinance in order to provide for a reasonable system of review
and incentives for well-designed signs throughout the City.
Establish a periodic review schedule of all City ordinances that govern
aesthetics to determine if industry standards have changed or if other PL RD A, K 4
objectives are desirable that require amendments.
Continue to require the undergrounding of utility lines and facilities
LU-11.2 O O wherever feasible to minimize the unsightly appearance of
overhead utility lines and utility enclosures.
Require undergrounding of utilities for new development. Develop a A B
' strategy and prioritization list for the undergrounding utilities in developed ENG PL C, 1 4
areas.
LU-11.3 O O Require communication towers to be located and designed to blend
with the surrounding environment.
Review and update design guidelines for the siting and general
appearance of communication towers to facilitate the least amount of PL A 4
visual intrusion. Emphasize use of stealth and architecturally integrated
antenna.
Ensure that streetscape design along roadways creates a strong
LU-12.1 O landscaped edge, provides a coherent high-quality appearance
' along each route, and enhances the image of adjacent
development.
Appendix A:Implementation Plan
RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN A-13
1
1
Action
Ty pe a
w General Plan Policy —
d
A A 0
y Ix 'S K c N
0
O O C *C
W
Q P n Implementation Action(s) E
IL o- H M yr W u. a
PL,AS, A B
Same actions as identified for RC-4.1 to RC-4.5. ENG ENG, C. E, 3
CM, BS, G,
PW, FIN
' Encourage development of transit-oriented and infill development,
PS-12.3 O and encourage a mix of uses that foster walking and alternative
transportation.
Same action as identified for RC-4.4. PL ENG A, 1 3
Provide enhanced bicycling and walking infrastructure,and support
PS-12.4 O public transit, including public bus service, the Metrolink, and the
potential for Bus Rapid Transit(BRT).
Same action as identified for RC-4.4. PL ENG A. 1 3
Provide green building incentives, assess green building
techniques as a formal stage of project review, and develop a green
PS-12.5 O building ordinance or program that addresses both new and
existing buildings. Adaptation strategies will also include increased
water efficiency in buildings.
' Same actions as identified for RC-6.1 to RC-6.4 PL BNG A, I, K 4
Encourage efforts to reduce waste generation and re-use and
PS-12.6 O support increased recycling and composting opportunities with a
focus on large commercial and industrial waste producers.
Same action as identified for PF-7.1. ENG PL A 3
Support tree planting, planting more vegetation (including native
PS-12.7 O O
' and drought-resistant planting),and preservation of open space.
Same actions as identified for RC-1.1, RC-8.1 to RC-8.7. PL ENG' A, 1 4
PS-12.8 O Develop green procurement plans and ensure energy savings in
City operations and maintenance.
Same actions as identified for RC-5.1 to RC-5.3. AS CM, FIN, A,B,C, 4
PW E, K
Develop energy- or climate change-themed publications and
workshops,facilitating energy audits for residents,and establishing
'
PS-12.9 O partnerships to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Increase public
awareness about climate change, and encourage residents and
businesses to become involved in activities and lifestyle changes
that help reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
Same action as identified for RC-5.1. CM ENG A, K 4
Consider the compatibility of proposed land uses with the noise
environment when preparing or revising community and/or specific
' PS-13.1 O plans and when reviewing development proposals. The contour
map depicting future noise levels (Figure PS-10) should be used by
the City as a guide to land use/noise compatibility.
' Appendix A:Implementation Plan
RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN A57
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
� MUNICIPAL LPi`ILITY
' Action
Ty Pe a
' a m General Plan Policy c e
dis
m K c c p N
Ir t ie A O O C '
T Y
0 o c Implementation Action(s) c
0. a H a w a' o.
' RC-8.7 O O Support protection of natural habitat areas for ecological,
educational,and other scientific study purposes.
Same action as identified for RC-8.3. PL ENG A, 1 4
' PF-1.1 O Continue to Implement high-quality standards for new public
facilities and Improvements to existing buildings.
Design and build all City buildings to serve as a model for quality
' architectural treatment and green building design in all new and PL ENG A, B, C 5
remodeled civic facilities.
PF-1.2 O Promote community facilities as focal points for gatherings,events,
and celebrations.
' Maintain all public facilities and buildings to address the needs of the
various neighborhoods within the City. Advertise the availability of civic PW CS, LIB A, B, C 3
facilities to community groups.
' PF-1.3 O Locate new community facilities in neighborhoods and centers
where they will serve populations with the greatest needs.
Review and assess the needs for the location of community facilities as CS ENG, PL A 6
' neighborhoods evolve.
PF-1.4 O O Maintain public facilities and optimize their usefulness during their
lifespan.
' Continue with proper maintenance programming and funding levels for PW CS, LIB, A, B, C 4
existing public facilities. AC
PF-1.5 O O Continue to Incorporate low-maintenance features Into public
' facilities consistent with the City's sustainability plan.
Replace features of public facilities with lower maintenance types as part PW PL, CS, A B,C 3
of the on-going maintenance program. BS
' PF-1.6 O Maintain multifunctional, flexible, and complementary space at
community facilities.
Same action as identified for PF-1.2. CS PW A, B, C 3
' Maximize public facility use by sharing with nonprofit
organizations, school districts,and community organizations. Look
PF-1.7 O for opportunities to create joint-use community space at facilities
owned by private organizations such as faith-based groups and
' service clubs.
Same action as identified for CS-2.5. CS A 4
Consult with local school districts to enhance the development of
' PF-2.1 O O joint-use agreements,allowing for optimum use of school facilities,
to provide broad community benefits such as public safety and
education.
' Continue and expand joint use of facilities to achieve even greater CS SD A, K 5
optimization of school facilities to service the entire community.
' Appendix A:Implementation Plan
A-44 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN
1
' Action L'
Ty pe a
' d d General Plan Policy — y
Y. m a'
0
K � .0
N G C C
Y m d Implementation Action(s) En m c o
o : n ` v ._
o. a U) aur X a a
' Pursue efforts to reduce energy consumption through appropriate
RC-0.1 O energy conservation and efficiency measures throughout all
segments of the community.
' As it becomes economically practical, identify sources and replace A B
imported, non-renewable energy resources with domestic renewable PL C. E. 5 ENG,
energy sources such as solar and wind energy, recycled municipal solid CM G
waste, and green waste.
t Promote the use of renewable energy and alternative energy
technology, and support efforts to develop small-scale, distributed
energy generation (e.g. solar, wind, cogeneration, and biomass) to
RC-4.2 O reduce the amount of electricity drawn from the regional power grid
' and reduce the use of natural gas, while providing Rancho
Cucamonga with a greater degree of energy and economic self-
sufficiency.
' Provided that there would not be a decline in services to City residents or A El
undue tax burden, use of energy efficiency and renewable energy ENG AS,CM, C, D, 6
resources will be employed for approving capital and operational PL E, G, I
expenditures.
' RC-4.3 O Encourage the use of solar energy systems In homes and
commercial businesses.
' Establish design criteria for active and passive solar applications within PL ENG, A 5
development proposals. BS
Reduce operational energy requirements through sustainable and
' RC-4.4 O O complementary land use and circulation planning. Support
implementation of State mandates regarding energy consumption
and greenhouse gas reduction,including AB32 and SB375.
' Promote land use and circulation patterns that result in multi-purpose
automobile trips and that facilitate the use of local and regional transit;
continue to advance land use patterns that provide employment and PL ENG A, 1 3
housing opportunities for City residents in a manner that allows for
practical options for mobility other than by automobile.
' Support the development of private sources of sustainable and
RC-0.5 O O environmentally friendly energy supplies, provided these are
consistent with City aesthetic and public safety goals.
' Continue to make the recruitment and retention of 'green" industries a RD CM, A. G 4
priority in conjunction with economic development strategies. PL
' Serve as a role model by adopting recognizable standards and
incorporating the use of sustainable strategies for new and existing
RC-5.1 O public buildings that maximize occupant health and productivity,
minimize operating costs, and provide good environmental
tstewardship.
' Appendix A:Implementation Plan
A-40 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL P L 4N
N�
W
a
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
1
tAction L
TY De a
' w General Plan Policy d
e m m 0
0
t
` C C
u ? W O O
Y o d Implementation Action(s) E a w c o
a° a rn 0.. U) W ri a
' Continue to assess that the recreational needs of the City's residents are
consistent with the City's parkland standard, and determine possible re- CS PL, ENG A 4
use or conversion of infill sites for recreational uses to serve areas within
the City with a disproportionate amount of parkland.
' Develop parks that contribute to active and healthy lifestyles, and
CS-1.2 O allow for a balanced commitment to both organized recreation
activities and passive park environments.
' Move forward with plans to continue to develop Central Park, expand
Etiwanda Creek Park, add one new Community park, one new Special CS CM, A 4
Use Facility, and two new Neighborhood parks. Incorporate active and ENG
' passive facilities into new parks.
CS-1.3 O Continue to develop Central Park as envisioned in the Central Park
Master Plan.
' Continue to prioritize implementation of the improvements for Central CS ENG, PL A 4
Park as part of the City's CIP process.
CS-1.4 O Pursue developing an outdoor special use facility that Includes a
' multi-field sports complex.
Continue to prioritize development of a sports complex and determine CS ENG, A 4
funding mechanisms, including corporate sponsorships/partnerships. RD, PL
' Continue to require new development to provide needed park
CS-1.5 O facilities through the various measures and tools available to the
City(e.g.,In-lieu fees and/or land dedication).
' Continue to make the provision of turn-key park and recreational facilities PL ENG, A, D, I, 4
the first priority over in-lieu fees for new residential development. CS K
' Pursue and expand joint-use of public lands that are available and
CS-1.6 O suitable for recreational purposes, including school district
properties and flood control district,water district,and other utility
properties.
' Continue to coordinate with other agencies holding public lands for CS
possible joint-use, trail easements, or re-use to serve park/recreation PL ENG A, K 4
particularly with school district properties.
' Encourage public safety and compatibility with adjacent uses
CS-1.7 O through park location and design, Including the location of
buildings, lighting, parking, public transit, emergency access, and
pedestrian/bicycle access. _
' Continue to utilize the Recreation Needs and System Recommendation CS PL, ENG A, K 4
Study and the park master plan concept in park planning.
O Continue to build, renovate,and maintain parks in a manner that Is
environmentally sustalnable.
' Appendix A:Implementation Plan
A-32 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN
1
' Action
TV Re s
v ; o General Plan Policy d
' v
W m a m as o
v It m u
v
e a c
B Q c Implementation Action(s) E C m o`
a. a to a H LL 0.
Continue to provide for maintenance, renovation and new construction of
' City parks in compliance with City policies, upgrading wastewater ENG CS PL, A B C 4
systems as needed, and as technology evolves, substitute material that PW
could reduce maintenance costs and is environmentally friendly.
Develop intermediate sized (10-12 acre) parks with lighted athletic
' CS-1.9 O fields and appropriate parking to accommodate community sports
programs.
Update the City's Recreation Needs and Systems Recommendation
Study to determine the location for intermediate-sized park sites CS PL, ENG A, B, C 7
specifically developed for athletic field use. This may include joint-use
facilities with a school district.
' Integrate Healthy RC activities, classes, and programs with
CS-2.1 O recreational services that contribute to the health, fitness, and
minds of participants.
' Continue to provide City-sponsored recreational programs and classes at CS CM A, 1 4
recreational centers/parks.
CS-2.2 O O Provide high-quality Community Services programs that are flexible
' and responsive to the community's changing needs.
Continue to provide active recreational opportunities through leagues CS CM A, 1 4
and organized sports.
' Plan and conduct community special events that bring residents
CS-2.3 O together to create an enhanced quality of life and promote
economic development.
' Plan for community events through the annual budgeting process. CS RD, CM A, 1 4
Continue to consult with non-profit sports organizations and
CS-2.4 O recreational groups to support their offering of diverse recreational
programs that complement and supplement those of the City.
Continue to serve as a clearinghouse to coordinate among the various CS A. 1 4
' sport leagues to make fields and facilities available.
Continue to make community facilities and park amenities available
CS-2.5 O for rental by community residents, non-profit groups and
businesses to meet their recreational and business needs.
' Continue to promote the City's various rental facility types by ensuring
that a complete summary of locations, facilities, services, fees, and CS A 4
applications are available.
' Continue broad-based public outreach activities that inform
CS-2.6 O residents of all available Community Services programs and
services, and obtain input from the community regarding program
' and service needs.
' Appendix A:Implementation Plan
R A N C H 0 CUCAMONGA G EN ERAL P L A N A-33
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 RAILROAD CROSSINGS
1
1
i
1
i
1
f
1
f
f
1
1
' Action
Ty pe a
m m General Plan Policy
c a o
' n L
h
m
2 E o o
e i Implementation Action(sj E a w a `o
ao a rn Q. w' z a IL
Continue to provide a safe and efficient street system in the City, to
CM-1.1 O support mobility goals, all transportation modes, and the goals of
t Managing the Land Use, Community Design, and Historic
Resources Chapter.
' Add the intersection improvements listed below to the Capital
Improvement Program (CIP) or appropriate equivalents identified and
approved by the City Engineer in the future that would offset the
identified impacts; implement the improvements as funding becomes
available. Prepare a report on the need for the improvements and their
' relationship to the impacts caused by new development in Rancho
Cucamonga.
• Work with Caltrans and SANBAG to implement a new freeway
' interchange at 1-15 and Arrow Highway.
• Complete Wilson Avenue between Milliken Avenue and Day
Creek Boulevard. ENG A, D, 1 7
• Complete Rochester Avenue between Banyan Street and
' Wilson Avenue.
• Pursue Federal funds for a grade separation of the SPRR at
Etiwanda Avenue.
• Complete stone drain and widening of Hellman Avenue from
' Foothill Boulevard to Cucamonga Creek.
• Complete Wilson Avenue from East Avenue to Wardman
Bullock.
• Improve the Base Line Road at I-15 Freeway Interchange.
' Complete Youngs Canyon from Chert' Avenue to Banyan
Street.
Provide an integrated network of roadways that provides for
CM-1.2 O convenient automobile, transit, bicycle, and pedestrian circulation
movement around the City.
Same actions as identified for CM-2.1 and CM-3.7. ENG PL A, D, 1 4
' Complete the circulation system by constructing new roadway
CM-1.3 O facilities and freeway interchanges pursuant to the Circulation Plan
(Figure CM-2).
Identify in the CIP future projects and new roadways based on available ENG PL A, D, 1 4
funding.
CM-1 4 O O Provide access for seniors and those with physical disabilities In all
elements of the transportation system.
Continue to operate the Silver Fox Express. Consult with Omnitrans
regarding providing ACCESS transportation services. ENG CS A, E. 4
' Require that all new future transportation facilities have appropriate and F. H, I
adequate access for seniors and people with physical disabilities.
' Appendix A:Implementation Plan
RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN A-19
' Action
TY pea
General Plan Policy c m
' m n a D 0
e m a m as o
C .N to
r ^ O O C
t e o Implementation Action(s) E n w c `o
a° a` to a y r � a
Complete intersection capacity improvements, coordinate traffic signals
utilizing Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS), and improve striping
and signage. Striping shall maximize room for bike lanes where feasible
and consistent with the Bicycle Plan. Modernize traffic signal equipment
as necessary, and continue to update traffic signal timing and ENG PW A, D 3
' synchronization plans to optimize traffic flow along the key arterial
corridors, taking into account the needs of transit, bicyclists, and
pedestrians as well. Invest in the communications infrastructure
necessary to operate a Citywide traffic signal control system.
Continue to design and operate arterials and Intersections for the
CM-4.2 O safe operation of all modes, Including transit, bicyclists, and
pedestrians.
' Same action as identified for CM-4.1. ENG A. D 3
CM-4.3 O Continue to implement Intelligent Transportation System Measures
' and advanced traffic management technologies where appropriate.
Same action as identified for CM-4.1. ENG PW E. FD, 3
' Maintain the City's transportation infrastructure in good condition;
CM-4.4 O O develop and maintain adequate funding sources for it's ongoing
maintenance and upkeep.
' Continue to implement and follow the schedule for resurfacing streets ENG A. D. 4
and streets improvements per the CIP. E. F
Continue to require that new development participates in the cost of
CM-5.1 O transportation mitigation and improvements necessitated by new
development,Including non-automobile solutions.
Require payment of Traffic Impact Fees as approved by the City Council,
' used to finance specific improvements made necessary by new
development. The relationship between the fees, the cost of the ENG PL D 4
improvements, and new development has been established in fee
analyses approved by the City Council. These fees shall be reviewed
from time to time and adjusted as needed.
Require evaluation of potential traffic and transportation impacts
CM-5.2 O associated with new development prior to project approval, and
' require adequate mitigation measures, including non-automobile
solutions, prior to,or concurrent with, project development.
Require applicants to prepare traffic and transportation impact
assessments consistent with adopted City guidelines and standards.
' Continue to require sidewalks, pedestrian paths, and connections to be ENG D 4
provided as part of new development projects to improve and enhance
access between neighborhoods, and from neighborhoods to schools,
' parks,trails,commercial centers, and other activity centers.
' Appendix A:Implementation Plan
A-26 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN
w
Nw
W
� � � � � � r � r � � � � � i ! � � �
Action L
T a
m m General Plan PolicyCc
3 _>
c . p « 0
rn
Yc
u m .0 Implementation Action(s) E a s c o
°
' o _`
aa` rn ah rc
Continue to provide a safe and efficient street system in the City,to
CM-1.1 O support mobility goals, all transportation modes, and the goals of
Managing the Land Use, Community Design, and Historic
Resources Chapter.
Add the intersection improvements listed below to the Capital
' Improvement Program (CIP) or appropriate equivalents identified and
approved by the City Engineer in the future that would offset the
identified impacts; implement the improvements as funding becomes
available. Prepare a report on the need for the improvements and their
' relationship to the impacts caused by new development in Rancho
Cucamonga.
• Work with Caltrans and SANBAG to implement a new freeway
' interchange at 1-15 and Arrow Highway.
• Complete Wilson Avenue between Milliken Avenue and Day
Creek Boulevard. ENG A. D. 1 7
• Complete Rochester Avenue between Banyan Street and
' Wilson Avenue.
• Pursue Federal funds for a grade separation of the SPRR at
Etiwanda Avenue.
• Complete storm drain and widening of Hellman Avenue from
' Foothill Boulevard to Cucamonga Creek.
• Complete Wilson Avenue from East Avenue to Wardman
Bullock.
• Improve the Base Line Road at 1-15 Freeway Interchange.
' Complete Youngs Canyon from Cherry Avenue to Banyan
Street.
Provide an integrated network of roadways that provides for
' CM-1.2 O convenient automobile, transit, bicycle, and pedestrian circulation
movement around the City.
Same actions as identified for CM-2.1 and CM-3.7. ENG PL A, D, 1 4
' Complete the circulation system by constructing new roadway
CM-1.3 O facilities and freeway interchanges pursuant to the Circulation Plan
(Figure CM-2).
Identify in the CIP future projects and new roadways based on available ENG PL A, D, 1 4
funding.
CM-1.4 O O Provide access for seniors and those with physical disabilities in all
elements of the transportation system.
Continue to operate the Silver Fox Express. Consult with Omnitrans
regarding providing ACCESS transportation services. ENG CS' A' E" 4 Require that all new future transportation facilities have appropriate and F, H. I
adequate access for seniors and people with physical disabilities.
' Appendix A:Implementation Plan
RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN A-19
! Action
TY PCa
m m General Plan Policy °
! m > °
7V y 0
`w c (ifma
N
Y A Q
.�
p
lJ.
! u ro Impementation Action(s) E
o ° a m
a a m 0-
Implement street design standards per this General Plan, except
! that modified standards may be applied where appropriate on
CM-1.5 O arterial corridors relating to transit, bicycle facilities, sidewalks,and
i on-street parking to be context sensitive to adjacent land uses and
districts, and to all roadway users, including transit, bicycles, and
! pedestrians.
Integrate into the CIP process the planning of modified standards for
Foothill Boulevard to accommodate BRT and for other arterials as! ENG PL A, D, I 4 appropriate to reflect the bikeway plan and pedestrian improvements
necessary to support Mixed Use districts.
CM-1.6 O pursue a railroad grade separation at Etiwanda Avenue and the
! BNSF Railway line.
Grade separations currently exist at Haven and Milliken Avenues. Due to
truck traffic associated with the southeast industrial area, the City ENG PL A, E, 1 4
! supports creating a railroad grade separation at Etiwanda Avenue and
the BNSF Railway line.
CM-2.1 O O Facilitate bicycling and walking citywide.
' Implement the Bicycle Master Plan included in the Community Mobility
Chapter.
! Require that pedestrian facilities and connections be provided as part of
all development projects, with an emphasis on connections within Mixed
Use districts. Implement all bicycling and walking policies and Mobility ENG PL, RD A, D, 1 4
Element components.
! Preparation and distribute bike route maps and bike facilities information.
Publish and make readily available pedestrian route maps and
pedestrian facilities information.
! Encourage all feasible measures to reduce total vehicle miles
CM-2.2 O traveled by automobiles, including enhanced transit access and
land use approaches that provide compact and focused
development along major transit corridors.
! Same actions as identified for LU-2.1, LU-5.4, LU-5.6, and CM-2.1. ENG PL A, D, I 4
CM-2.3 O Support the use of hybrid,electric,and lowizero emission vehicles.
! Continue to maintain the Green Team Sustainability Action Matrix that
identifies current and proposed efforts that procure vehicles that includes
providing gas-efficient vehicles. CM PL AS
PW ' A, E, F 7
!
Amend the Development Code as appropriate to accommodate
alternative fuel service stations and charging facilities.
CM-24 OReplace City vehicles with energy-efficient and alternative fuel
! source models when replacing vehicles or adding to the City's fleet.
' Appendix A:Implementation Plan
A-20 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN
' Action
TY Pea
m ; General Plan Policy c m
' m
OR
> A 0
K c K c N W
; ^ mo o
' e ro Implementation Actlon(s) E n m c `o
Q. IL WQ. a. w' W ri a
Complete intersection capacity improvements, coordinate traffic signals
' utilizing Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS), and improve striping
and signage. Striping shall maximize room for bike lanes where feasible
and consistent with the Bicycle Plan. Modernize traffic signal equipment
as necessary, and continue to update traffic signal timing and ENG PW A, D 3
' synchronization plans to optimize traffic flow along the key arterial
corridors, taking into account the needs of transit, bicyclists, and
pedestrians as well. Invest in the communications infrastructure
necessary to operate a Citywide traffic signal control system.
Continue to design and operate arterials and intersections for the
CM-4 2 01 safe operation of all modes, including transit, bicyclists, and
pedestrians.
' Same action as identified for CM-4.1. ENG A. D 3
CM-4.3 O Continue to implement Intelligent Transportation System Measures
' and advanced traffic management technologies where appropriate.
Same action as identified for CM-4.1. ENG PW E. �' 3
' Maintain the City's transportation infrastructure in good condition;
CM-4.4 O O develop and maintain adequate funding sources for it's ongoing
maintenance and upkeep.
' Continue to implement and follow the schedule for resurfacing streets ENG A, D' 4
and streets improvements per the CIP. E, F
Continue to require that new development participates in the cost of
' CM-5.1 O transportation mitigation and improvements necessitated by new
development, including non-automobile solutions.
Require payment of Traffic Impact Fees as approved by the City Council,
I used to finance specific improvements made necessary by new
development. The relationship between the fees, the cost of the ENG PL D 4
improvements, and new development has been established in fee
analyses approved by the City Council. These fees shall be reviewed
' from time to time and adjusted as needed.
Require evaluation of potential traffic and transportation Impacts
CM-5.2 O associated with new development prior to project approval, and
require adequate mitigation measures, including non-automobile
' solutions, prior to, or concurrent with,project development.
Require applicants to prepare traffic and transportation impact
assessments consistent with adopted City guidelines and standards.
Continue to require sidewalks, pedestrian paths, and connections to be ENG D 4
provided as part of new development projects to improve and enhance
access between neighborhoods, and from neighborhoods to schools,
parks,trails,commercial centers, and other activity centers.
' Appendix A:Implementation Plan
A-26 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN
1
' Action L
Ty pe c
a m General Plan Policy c m
' v0
W
0 Af
c c a rn
m
u 0 0 5
6 a .0 Implementation Actions) E a m c
' 0. a W a to rc a' a`
ED-3.7 O O Support access to local and regional educational resources that
provide educational opportunities to local residents and workers.
Coordinate with local and regional centers for higher education to RD PL,CM A 4
promote access to and programs for additional educational opportunities.
' ED-4.1 O Encourage high-quality design for infill development and continue
to support now high quality uses.
Same action as identified for LU-5.1 to 5.6. PL RD
ENG A, I, K 4
' ED-4.2 O Make green building and green business a priority.
' Same action as identified for LU-7.1 to 7.3. PL RD A, G 3
ED-4.3 O O Improve connectivity between development projects to create a
more cohesive atmosphere.
' Same action as identified for LU-2.3. PL ENG A 5
ED-4.4 O Focus on enhancements to Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue.
' Same action as identified for LU-5.1 to 5.6. PL RD ENG A, I, K 5
ED-4.5 O Review and understand the fiscal, job creation, and economic
' benefits of new proposed uses in the City's industrial-zoned areas.
Focus a special economic development effort on assessing where re-use
or conversion of industrial properties to other uses could occur. Identify RD PL A, G 5
' potential conflicts in order to develop a strategy for when such
conversions could be considered a benefit versus a cost.
ED-5.1 O1 1 Engage in regional transit planning efforts.
' Continue to be involved in planning efforts to address regional
transportation solutions, particularly those providing transit options. In PL ENG A, K 4
particular, work with Omnitrans in its efforts to establish BRT service in
' Rancho Cucamonga.
ED-5.2 O Continue to capitalize on proximity to Interstate 10, Interstate 15,
State Route 210,and the LA/Ontario International Airport.
' Review and assess the effectiveness of way-finding signage to ensure
that the City's accessibility to 1-10, 1-15 and SR-210 from major areas of
City commerce hubs is easily ascertained and facilitated. Begin RD PL, ENG A, G 4
programs to improve such signage where it is deficient or confusing.
Maximize the benefits of a major airport just outside of the City's borders.
Provide adequate park and recreational facilities that meet the City
CS-1.1 O standard of 5.0 acres of parkland (including trails and special
facilities)for every 1,000 persons.
Appendix A:Implementation Plan A-31
R A N C H 0 CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN
H
w
N
1 i
' Ac on L
Ty pe
u m General Plan Policy c m
c m o
ca rn
m
Y c .O Implementation Action(s) E ra w c o
o° o. w Q. in X LL a.
CM- Continue to provide pedestrian amenities on sidewalks on major
311 O streets that are key pedestrian routes, including the provision of
' benches,shade trees,and trash cans.
Identify key pedestrian travel corridors citywide, and prepare a Citywide
Pedestrian Circulation Study to determine pedestrian amenity needs,
capital and operating funding sources, and a phased implementation
program. Develop a program for gradually installing public amenities A B
such as streetlights, benches, trash containers, art, drinking fountains, ENG PL C D 5
landscaping, etc. that will enhance the pedestrian environment and
' encourage increased use of transit. Use both the CIP process and other
funding sources, including a program whereby businesses or residents
may sponsor street furniture and/or landscaped areas.
' CM- Continue to require that the siting and architectural design of new
312 O development promote safety, pedestrian-friendly design, and
access to transit facilities.
' Develop standards to be applied to development projects along transit PL ENG 1 4
corridors that require transit and pedestrian accessibility.
Establish a number of bike hubs in the City (centralized locations
' CM- O with convenient bike parking for trip destinations or transfer to
3.13 other transportation modes), at key transit nodes, and at
commercial nodes.
' Conduct a study to determine the best locations for bike hubs in the City,
and develop a plan,wayfinding program, and implementation process for A. B,
providing bike hubs that provide secure IFcycle lockers, bike racks, and ENG PL, RD C D 4
connections to transit at key locations in the City.
1 CM- O Enhance pedestrian and bicycle access to local and regional
3.14 transit,Including facilitating connections to transit.
Same action as identified for CM-3.7. ENG PL 1 4
CM- Coordinate the provision of the non-motorized networks (bicycle
3.15 O and pedestrian) with adjacent jurisdictions to maximize sub-
regional connectivity.
iSame action as identified for CM-3.7. ENG PL A, E, F 4
CM- O Establish fixed-route local circulator bus service connecting major
' 3.16 activity centers.
Explore development of a fixed-route local circulator bus system, station ENG PL A, E, H 5
location, and funding mechanisms.
' Continue to implement traffic management and traffic signal
CM-.1 O operations measures along the arterial roadway to minimize delay
and congestion for all modes, without adversely impacting transit,
bicycles, and pedestrians.
1 Appendix A:Implementation Plan
RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN A-25
' Action
Ty pea
C ; General Plan Policy o D `
mo d rna N
n Z Y c c
.0 `Implementation Action(s) E a a C .`o_
O 6 0 `
Q. o .w am o: LL a
Complete intersection capacity improvements, coordinate traffic signals
utilizing Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS), and improve striping
and signage. Striping shall maximize room for bike lanes where feasible
and consistent with the Bicycle Plan. Modernize traffic signal equipment
as necessary, and continue to update traffic signal timing and ENG PW A. D 3
synchronization plans to optimize traffic flow along the key arterial
corridors, taking into account the needs of transit, bicyclists, and
pedestrians as well. Invest in the communications infrastructure
necessary to operate a Citywide traffic signal control system.
' Continue to design and operate arterials and intersections for the
CM-4.2 O safe operation of all modes, including transit, bicyclists, and
pedestrians.
tSame action as identified for CM-4.1. ENG A, D 3
CM-4.3 O Continue to Implement Intelligent Transportation System Measures
' and advanced traffic management technologies where appropriate.
Same action as identified for CM-4.1. ENG PW A. D' 3
E.Maintain the City's transportation infrastructure in good condition;
CM-4.4 O O develop and maintain adequate funding sources for We ongoing
maintenance and upkeep.
Continue to implement and follow the schedule for resurfacing streets ENG A, D' 4
and streets improvements per the CIP. E, F
Continue to require that new development participates in the cost of
CM-51 O transportation mitigation and improvements necessitated by new
development, including non-automobile solutions.
Require payment of Traffic Impact Fees as approved by the City Council,
' used to finance specific improvements made necessary by new
development. The relationship between the fees, the cost of the ENG PL D 4
improvements, and new development has been established in fee
analyses approved by the City Council. These fees shall be reviewed
from time to time and adjusted as needed.
Require evaluation of potential traffic and transportation impacts
CM-5.2 O associated with new development prior to project approval, and
require adequate mitigation measures, including non-automobile
solutions,prior to,or concurrent with, project development.
Require applicants to prepare traffic and transportation impact
assessments consistent with adopted City guidelines and standards.
Continue to require sidewalks, pedestrian paths, and connections to be ENG D 4
provided as part of new development projects to improve and enhance
access between neighborhoods, and from neighborhoods to schools,
parks,trails,commercial centers, and other activity centers.
Appendix A:Implementation Plan
A-26 R A N C H 0 C U C A M 0 N G A G E N E R A L P L A N
A
w
A
w
A
w
N
w
Action L
Typea
m funeral Plan Policy c m
' n a 0
d C C.a N
'_' Implementation Action(s) a a v
o m E am c o`
a a N d N lY u_ O.
Continue to provide a safe and efficient street system in the City,to
CM-1.1 O support mobility goals, all transportation modes, and the goals of
Managing the Land Use, Community Design, and Historic
Resources Chapter.
Add the intersection improvements listed below to the Capital
Improvement Program (CIP) or appropriate equivalents identified and
approved by the City Engineer in the future that would offset the
Identified impacts; implement the improvements as funding becomes
available. Prepare a report on the need for the improvements and their
relationship to the impacts caused by new development in Rancho
Cucamonga.
• Work with Caltrans and SANBAG to implement a new freeway
interchange at 1-15 and Arrow Highway.
• Complete Wilson Avenue between Milliken Avenue and Day
Creek Boulevard. ENG A, D, 1 7
• Complete Rochester Avenue between Banyan Street and
Wilson Avenue.
• Pursue Federal funds for a grade separation of the SPRR at
Etiwanda Avenue.
• Complete storm drain and widening of Hellman Avenue from
Foothill Boulevard to Cucamonga Creek.
• Complete Wilson Avenue from East Avenue to Wardman
Bullock.
• Improve the Base Line Road at 1-15 Freeway Interchange.
' Complete Youngs Canyon from Cherry Avenue to Banyan
Street.
Provide an integrated network of roadways that provides for
CM-1.2 O convenient automobile, transit, bicycle, and pedestrian circulation
movement around the City.
Same actions as identified for CM-2.1 and CM-3.7. ENG PL A. D, 1 4
t Complete the circulation system by constructing new roadway
CM-1.3 O facilities and freeway interchanges pursuant to the Circulation Plan
(Figure CM-2).
' Identify in the CIP future projects and new roadways based on available ENG PL A, D, 1 4
funding.
CM-1.4 O O Provide access for seniors and those with physical disabilities in all
elements of the transportation system.
Continue to operate the Silver Fox Express. Consult with Omnitrans
regarding providing ACCESS transportation services. A' E
ENG CS ' 4
Require that all new future transportation facilities have appropriate and F, H, I
adequate access for seniors and people with physical disabilities.
1
Appendix A:Implementation Plan
RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN A-19
1
' Action D
Ty Pe
m m General Plan Policy c o
' c m °
A _ 0
01 o
ff
0 C C C .y W
e .0 Implementation Action(s) E a °' c o
ao Q .m a AQ LL a
Complete intersection capacity improvements, coordinate traffic signals
' utilizing Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS), and improve striping
and signage. Striping shall maximize room for bike lanes where feasible
and consistent with the Bicycle Plan. Modernize traffic signal equipment
as necessary, and continue to update traffic signal timing and ENG PW A, D 3
synchronization plans to optimize traffic flow along the key arterial
corridors, taking into account the needs of transit, bicyclists, and
pedestrians as well. Invest in the communications infrastructure
necessary to operate a Citywide traffic signal control system.
' Continue to design and operate arterials and Intersections for the
CM-4.2 O safe operation of all modes, including transit, bicyclists, and
pedestrians.
Same action as identified for CM-4.1. ENG A, D 3
CM-4.3 p Continue to implement Intelligent Transportation System Measures
and advanced traffic management technologies where appropriate.
Same action as identified for CM-4.1. ENG PW E' ED' 3
Maintain the City's transportation infrastructure in good condition;
CM-4.4 O O develop and maintain adequate funding sources for We ongoing
maintenance and upkeep.
Continue to implement and follow the schedule for resurfacing streets ENG A, D, 4
and streets improvements per the CIP. E F
Continue to require that new development participates in the cost of
CM-5.1 O transportation mitigation and improvements necessitated by new
development,including non-automobile solutions.
Require payment of Traffic Impact Fees as approved by the City Council,
used to finance specific improvements made necessary by new
development. The relationship between the fees, the cost of the ENG PL D 4
improvements, and new development has been established in fee
analyses approved by the City Council. These fees shall be reviewed
from time to time and adjusted as needed.
' Require evaluation of potential traffic and transportation impacts
CM-5.2 O associated with new development prior to project approval, and
require adequate mitigation measures, including non-automobile
' solutions, prior to,or concurrent with, project development.
Require applicants to prepare traffic and transportation impact
assessments consistent with adopted City guidelines and standards.
Continue to require sidewalks, pedestrian paths, and connections to be ENG D 4
provided as part of new development projects to improve and enhance
access between neighborhoods, and from neighborhoods to schools,
parks,trails,commercial centers, and other activity centers.
1
Appendix A:Implementation Plan
A-26 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN
I
1
' Action
Ty pe8
m General Plan Policy m
C N > O y
v m a o
w
R W O o
' .2 o d Implementation Action(s) E a s c `o
. w IL in W U. a.
0 a
Continue to assess that the recreational needs of the City's residents are
consistent with the City's parkland standard, and determine possible re- CS PL, ENG A 4
use or conversion of infill sites for recreational uses to serve areas within
the City with a disproportionate amount of parkland.
Develop parks that contribute to active and healthy lifestyles, and
CS-1.2 O allow for a balanced commitment to both organized recreation
activities and passive park environments.
Move forward with plans to continue to develop Central Park, expand
1 Etiwanda Creek Park, add one new Community park, one new Special CM, A 4
Use Facility, and two new Neighborhood parks. Incorporate active and CS ENG
passive facilities into new parks.
CS-1.3 O Continue to develop Central Park as envisioned in the Central Park
Master Plan.
Continue to prioritize implementation of the improvements for Central CS ENG, PL A 4
' Park as part of the City's CIP process.
CS-1.4 O Pursue developing an outdoor special use facility that Includes a
multi-field sports complex.
Continue to prioritize development of a sports complex and determine ENG,
funding mechanisms, including corporate sponsorships/partnerships. CS RD, PL A 4
Continue to require new development to provide needed park
CS-1.5 O facilities through the various measures and tools available to the
City(e.g.,in-Qeu fees and/or land dedication).
Continue to make the provision of turn-key park and recreational facilities PL ENG, A, D, I, 4
the first priority over in-lieu fees for new residential development. CS K
Pursue and expand joint-use of public lands that are available and
' CS-1.6 O suitable for recreational purposes, including school district
properties and flood control district, water district, and other utility
properties.
Continue to coordinate with other agencies holding public lands for
possible joint-use, trail easements, or re-use to serve park/recreation PL CS ENG A, K 4
particularly with school district properties.
Encourage public safety and compatibility with adjacent uses
' CS-1.7 O through park location and design, including the location of
buildings, lighting, parking, public transit, emergency access, and
pedestrianibicycle access.
Continue to utilize the Recreation Needs and System Recommendation CS PL, ENG A, K 4
Study and the park master plan concept in park planning.
CS-1.8 O O Continue to build, renovate,and maintain parks in a manner that is
environmentally sustainable.
' Appendix A:Implementation Plan
A-32 R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A G E N E R A L P L A N
1
1
' Action D
Ty Pe a
m m General Plan Policy c m
@ • a 0
' C 'c c a ai
w
m
lox o o c Z'
•o .� Implementation Action(s) E a H c `o _
y i rn 0
Continue to provide for maintenance, renovation and new construction of
City parks in compliance with City policies, upgrading wastewater ENG CS, PL, A, B, C 4
systems as needed, and as technology evolves, substitute material that PW
could reduce maintenance costs and is environmentally friendly.
Develop intermediate sized (10-12 acre) parks with lighted athletic
' CS-1.9 O fields and appropriate parking to accommodate community sports
programs.
Update the City's Recreation Needs and Systems Recommendation
' Study to determine the location for intermediate-sized park sites CS PL, ENG A, B, C 7
specifically developed for athletic field use. This may include joint-use
facilities with a school district.
' Integrate Healthy RC activities, classes, and programs with
CS-2.1 O recreational services that contribute to the health, fitness, and
minds of participants.
' Continue to provide City-sponsored recreational programs and classes at CS CM A, 1 4
recreational centers/parks.
CS-2.2 O O Provide high-quality Community Services programs that are Flexible
' and responsive to the community's changing needs.
Continue to provide active recreational opportunities through leagues CS CM A, 1 4
and organized sports.
' Plan and conduct community special events that bring residents
CS-2.3 O together to create an enhanced quality of life and promote
economic development.
' Plan for community events through the annual budgeting process. CS RD, CM A. 1 4
Continue to consult with non-profit sports organizations and
CS-2.4 O recreational groups to support their offering of diverse recreational
' programs that complement and supplement those of the City.
Continue to serve as a clearinghouse to coordinate among the various CS A, 1 4
sport leagues to make fields and facilities available.
' Continue to make community facilities and park amenities available
CS-2.6 O for rental by community residents, non-profit groups and
businesses to meet their recreational and business needs.
' Continue to promote the City's various rental facility types by ensuring
that a complete summary of locations, facilities, services, fees, and CS A 4
applications are available.
' Continue broad-based public outreach activities that inform
CS-2.6 O residents of all available Community Services programs and
services, and obtain input from the community regarding program
' and service needs.
' Appendix A:Implementation Plan
RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN A-33
1
Action
TV Pe n
m ; General Plan Policy m
w m v rna o
m LL' C 0!' C •y N
T V W N OO O
' e m Implementation Action(s) E a w c .`o_
Q. Q. m d N X a
Expand recreation and cultural attractions to enhance
ED-2.3 O tourismlvisitor potential and to boost sales and transient
occupancy tax.
Develop brochures or links from the City's web site to showcase the
various recreational and cultural venues to attract visitors to the City.
' Enhancement of cultural amenities, including regional entertainment RD CS A 7
options, recreation, and historic preservation, will help to embellish the
City's reputation as a destination for a wide range of visitors.
' Expand lodging choices in the City through the recruitment and
ED-2.4 O placement of full-service hotels that will complement the existing
select-service hotel portfolio.
' Review and update marketing strategies (land surveys, infrastructure
availability, and modes of transportation) to solicit the development of a RD PL A, G 4
full-service lodging facility. Make sure that zoning regulations can
accommodate a full-service hotel at desired locations.
ED-3.1 O O Continue to make public safety a priority.
Use the annual budgeting process to allocate funding for public safety
' services, equipment, and facilities commensurate with the City's service CM PD, FD A 6
objectives.
ED-3.2 O Provide community and cultural amenities.
' Same action as identified for ED-2.3. CS CM, RD A 4
ED-3.3 O Maintain a healthy fiscal balance.
' Use the annual budgeting process to check that revenues from all CM AS, FIN
sources continue to more than match projected spending.
' ED-3.4 O O Improve internal circulation for all modes of transportation,
consistent with the concept of"Complete Streets".
Same action as identified for LU-3.1 to 3.8. ENG PL A, G 4
' ED-3.5 O Facilitate development of additional local and regional
entertainment venues.
Focus a special economic development team on the task of working
towards attracting developers and investors interested in responding to RD PL A, G 6
local and regional demand for new entertainment options.
' ED-3.6 O Leverage the City's quality of life amenities to attract more
knowledge-based workers.
Expand the Economic Development Strategy to market Rancho
Cucamonga's civic assets, including parks, recreation and community RDPL, CS A, G 4
enrichment facilities and programs,trails,and quality school districts. TI
Appendix A:Implementation Plan
A-30 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GEN ERAL PLAN
1
1 Action
Ty pea
m m General Plan Policy c m
m m m n
m - o
m m W'
E a h
1 " 4 z OO C
r m
c CL CL
c n Implementation Action(s) E m oc
1 a a w o` w z LL o.
PF-Q. O Consider the needs of the school districts that serve Rancho
Cucamonga in future planning and development activities.
1 Continue a collaborative approach involving City and school district CS SD A, K 4
facilities.
1 Partner with local public and private schools and Chaffey
PF-2.3 O Community College to maintain effective educational programs for
residents of all ages.
1 Plan for regular consultation with local public and private schools and
Chaffey Community College to identify populations that most need CS SD A, K 5
educational programs. Supplement the efforts of those agencies with
City programs as needed and as resources allow.
1 PF-2.4 O O Consult with school districts to explore grant funding opportunities
for Joint City and school district partnerships and programs.
Same action as identified for PF-2.2. CS SD A. K 4
1 Continue to provide high-quality library services to the community,
PF-3.1 O Including supporting the Archibald Library and Paul A. Biane
Library.
1 Continue to employ short-, intermediate- and long-term strategies to A B
sustain quality library services to the community. Expand current levels C. E,
of service by expanding collections, implementing innovative programs, LIB F, G, 4
1 continually improving existing facilities, providing expanded hours of H
operation, and providing continuous on-line access.
Continue to improve the local Libraries system, complete with
community facilities that provide knowledgeable, service-oriented
1 PF-3.2 O staff and offer access to information, books, and other materials in
a variety of formats, including emerging technologies. Consider
future options for providing library services that are flexible, and
will maximize library services while keeping costs affordable.
1
Same action as identified for PF-3.1. LIB C, G, 4
H
1 PF-3.3 O Continue to foster pride in the Library as a place for the entire
community.
A, B,
1 Same action as identified for PF-3.1. LIB C, G, 4
H
Lead by example by successfully considering the full "lifecycle"
1 PF-3.4 O cost for new public library facilities and improvements to existing
library facilities.
Utilize green building approaches in the design of all new and remodeled LIB PL, BS A. K 6
1 library facilities.
1 Appendix A:Implementation Plan
RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN A-45
1
1
' Action L'
Ty Pe a
v d General Plan Policy c
U
N y
' d K EIr
K N N
a V 5 m O O
u e .m Implementation Action(s) E a s a `o
' o o d o
0 a vi) Q.
Z
L m W a`
PL,AS, A B
Same actions as identified for RC-41 to RC-.5. ENG ENG
CM, B, S, C, E, 3
' PW, FIN G, I
Encourage development of transit-oriented and infill development,
PS-12.3 O and encourage a mix of uses that foster walking and alternative
' transportation.
Same action as identified for RC-4.4. PL ENG A, 1 3
' Provide enhanced bicycling and walking infrastructure, and support
PS-12.4 O public transit, including public bus service, the Metrolink, and the
potential for Bus Rapid Transit(BRT).
Same action as identified for RC-4.4 PL ENG A, 1 3
' Provide green building incentives, assess green building
techniques as a formal stage of project review, and develop a green
PS-12.5 O building ordinance or program that addresses both new and
' existing buildings. Adaptation strategies will also include increased
water efficiency in buildings.
Same actions as identified for RC-6.1 to RC-6.4 PL BS ENG A, I, K 4
' Encourage efforts to reduce waste generation and re-use and
PS-12.6 O support increased recycling and composting opportunities with a
focus on large commercial and industrial waste producers.
' Same action as identified for PF-7.1. ENG PL A 3
PS-12.7 O O support tree planting, planting more vegetation (including native
and drought-resistant planting),and preservation of open space.
' Same actions as identified for RC-1.1, RC-8.1 to RC-8.7. PL PW' A, 4
' PS-12.8 O Develop green procurement plans and ensure energy savings in
City operations and maintenance.
Same actions as identified for RC-5.1 to RC-5.3. AS CM, FIN, A,B, C. 4
PW E, K
' Develop energy- or climate change-themed publications and
workshops,facilitating energy audits for residents, and establishing
PS-12.9 O partnerships to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Increase public
' awareness about climate change, and encourage residents and
businesses to become involved in activities and lifestyle changes
that help reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
' Same action as identified for RC-5.1. CM ENG A, K 4
Consider the compatibility of proposed land uses with the noise
environment when preparing or revising community and/or specific
PS-13.1 O plans and when reviewing development proposals. The contour
' map depicting future noise levels (Figure PS-10)should be used by
the City as a guide to land use/noise compatibility.
' Appendix A:Implementation Plan A 57
RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN
I J-%
Table of Contents:
RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN
Chapter 1: An Introduction to the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan
OurCity Our Future............................................................................................................................1-1
Roleof the General Plan.....................................................................................................................1-2
HealthyRC: Mind, Body, and Earth.....................................................................................................1-3
The General Plan Community Collaboration Process.........................................................................1-4
Defining the Spirit of Rancho Cucamonga..........................................................................................1-6
GeneralPlan Framework...................................................................................................................1-10
Usingthe General Plan .....................................................................................................................1-12
Chapter 2: Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources
Introduction......................................................................................................................................LU-1
AchievingOur Vision.......................................................................................................................LU-2
LandUse.........................................................................................................................................LU-4
LandUse Goals and Policies........................................................................................................LU-56
CommunityDesign........................................................................................................................LU-69
Community Design Goals and Policies.........................................................................................LU-94
HistoricResources......................................................................................................................LU-100
Historic Preservation Goals and Policies....................................................................................LU-113
Chapter 3: Community Mobility
Introduction.....................................................................................................................................CM-1
AchievingOur Vision......................................................................................................................CM-2
CommunityMobility Strategies.......................................................................................................CM-2
Community Mobility: The Street System........................................................................................CM-4
Transit...........................................................................................................................................CM-17
IncreasingBicycle Use.................................................................................................................CM-25
Accommodating Pedestrians........................................................................................................CM-31
Freightand Goods Movement......................................................................................................CM-32
Aviation.........................................................................................................................................CM-37
Related Transportation Plans.......................................................................................................CM-37
CommunityMobility Issues...........................................................................................................CM-39
Community Mobility Goals and Policies.......................................................................................CM-40
Chapter 4: Economic Development
Introduction......................................................................................................................................ED-1
AchievingOur Vision.......................................................................................................................ED-2
EconomicOverview.........................................................................................................................ED-3
Redevelopment and Investment......................................................................................................ED-3
Diverse and Sustainable Economic Base .......................................................................................ED-5
Long-Term Fiscal Sustainability......................................................................................................ED-9
RANCHO CUCAMONGA G E N E RAL PLAN j
Qualityof Life.................................................................................................................................ED-10
Economic Development Issues.....................................................................................................ED-12
Economic Development Goals and Policies..................................................................................ED-13
Chapter 5: Community Services
Introduction......................................................................................................................................CS-1
AchievingOur Vision.......................................................................................................................CS-2
Parks and Special Use Facilities.....................................................................................................CS-3
Hikingand Riding Trails.................................................................................................................CS-14
Community Services Programs.....................................................................................................CS-21
HealthyLifestyles...........................................................................................................................CS-30
CommunityServices Issues..........................................................................................................CS-33
Community Services Goals and Policies.......................................................................................CS-34
Chapter 6: Resource Conservation
Introduction..................................................................................................................................... RC-1
AchievingOur Vision...................................................................................................................... RC-2
OpenSpace'Resources................................................................................................................. RC-3
MineralResources.......................................................................................................................... RC-6
Agricultural and Cultural Resources............................................................................................. RC-13
WaterResources.......................................................................................................................... RC-15
EnergyResources........................................................................................................................ RC-22
GreenBuildings............................................................................................................................ RC-24
WildlifeResources........................................................................................................................ RC-26
Resource Conservation Issues..................................................................................................... RC-33
Resource Conservation Goals and Policies................................................................................. RC-35
Chapter 7: Public Facilities and Infrastructure
Introduction......................................................................................................................................PF-1
AchievingOur Vision.......................................................................................................................PF-2
PublicFacilities................................................................................................................................PF-3
Schools and Educational Facilities..................................................................................................PF-9
LibraryServices.............................................................................................................................PF-14
AnimalCare and Services.............................................................................................................PF-16
Infrastructure..................................................................................................................................PF-17
Public Facilities and Infrastructure Issues.....................................................................................PF-25
Public Facilities and Infrastructure Goals and Policies..................................................................PF-27
Chapter 8: Public Health and Safety
Introduction......................................................................................................................................PS-1
AchievingOur Vision.......................................................................................................................PS-2
Fireand Emergency Services.........................................................................................................PS-3
CrimePrevention.............................................................................................................................PS-9
Seismicand Geologic Hazards.....................................................................................................PS-12
FloodHazards and Inundation ......................................................................................................PS-21
WindHazards................................................................................................................................PS-26
Aviation Hazards and Airport Compatibility Planning....................................................................PS-29
Air Quality, Atmosphere, and Climate...........................................................................................PS-33
Noise..............................................................................................................................................PS-35
Public Health and Safety Issues....................................................................................................PS-43
Public Health and Safety Goals and Policies................................................................................PS-47
ii RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN
Chapter 9: Housing
Introduction......................................................................................................................................HE-1
HousingNeeds Assessment...........................................................................................................HE-5
HousingConstraints......................................................................................................................HE-35
HousingResources.......................................................................................................................HE-61
HousingPlan .................................................................................................................................HE-86
Appendices:
Appendix A: Implementation Plan
Appendix B: 2000-2005 Housing Element Program Evaluation
Appendix C: Vacant Uncommitted Residential Land Inventory
Appendix D: Glossary
List of Tables
Table 1-1: General Plan Chapters that Reference Healthy RC..................................................................I-3
Table LU-1: Land Use Distribution-2009.................................................................................................LU-4
Table LU-2: Victoria Gardens/Victoria Arbors Land Use Mix..................................................................LU-22
Table LU-3: Mixed Use:Town Center(Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue).....................................LU-26
Table LU-4: Mixed Use:Terra Vista........................................................................................................LU-27
Table LU-5: Mixed Use: Foothill Boulevard between Hermosa Avenue and Center Avenue.................LU-27
Table LU-6: Mixed Use: Western Foothill Corridor between Archibald Avenue and Hellman Avenue...LU-29
Table LU-7: Mixed Use: Foothill Boulevard at Helms Avenue and Hampshire Street............................LU-30
Table LU-8: Mixed Use: Foothill Boulevard and Mayten Avenue............................................................LU-31
Table LU-9: Mixed Use: Industrial Area Specific Plan/Sub Area 18........................................................LU-32
Table LU-10: Mixed Use: Foothill Boulevard and Deer Creek Channel....................................................LU-32
Table LU-11: Mixed Use: Haven Avenue and Church Street Site.............................................................LU-33
Table LU-12: Mixed Use:Western Foothill Gateway Bear Gulch Area.....................................................LU-34
Table LU-13: Mixed Use: Foothill Boulevard-Cucamonga Channel Site ................................................LU-34
Table LU-14: Mixed Use:Alta Loma (Amethyst Site)................................................................................LU-35
TableLU-15: Build-Out Summary..............................................................................................................LU-36
Table LU-16: Land Use Plan Summary-Residential Designations............................................................LU-37
Table LU-17: Land Use Plan Summary-Non-Residential Designations....................................................LU-38
Table LU-18: Build Out Summary by Land Use........................................................................................LU-39
Table LU-19: Slope Development Guidelines ...........................................................................................LU-47
Table LU-20: General Plan Land Use Designations and Development District Consistency Matrix........LU-49
Table LU-21: Adopted Specific Plans and Planned Communities............................................................LU-50
Table LU-22: General Plan Special Boulevards........................................................................................LU-78
Table LU-23: Beautification Master Plans.................................................................................................LU-80
Table LU-24: Entry Monuments Design Elements....................................................................................LU-83
Table CM-1: Classifications of General Plan Roadways.........................................................................CM-11
Table CM-2: Roadway Functional Design Guidelines.............................................................................CM-15
Table ED-1: Top Industries in Rancho Cucamonga versus Top Industries
WhereResidents Work..........................................................................................................ED-6
Table CS-1: Established Parks and Special Use Facilities(2009)............................................................CS-4
TableCS-2: Park Standards....................................................................................................................CS-10
Table CS-3: Base Level Park Development Guidelines for Neighborhood Parks...................................CS-11
Table CS-4: Base Level Park Development Guidelines for Community Parks.......................................CS-12
Table CS-5: Base Level Park Development Guidelines for Special Use Facilities..................................CS-13
Table CS-6: Recreation Facility Needs Ratio for Rancho Cucamonga...................................................CS-14
Table CS-7: Sports Programs and Activities............................................................................................CS-23
Table CS-8: RC Family Resource Center Programs and Services.........................................................CS-28
Table CS-9: Older Adult Programs and Activities....................................................................................CS-29
Table RC-1: Areas of Designated Regionally Significant Aggregate Resources.................................... RC-11
Table RC-2: Significant Agricultural Lands............................................................................................. RC-14
RANCHO CUCAMONGA GE NE RAL PLAN iii
Table RC-3: Water Sources(Acre-Feet per Year).................................................................................. RC-16
Table PF-1: Community Facilities..............................................................................................................PF-5
Table PF-2: Schools Serving Rancho Cucamonga.................................................................................PF-10
Table PF-3: School District Student Capacity.........................................................................................PF-13
Table PF-4: Drainage Facility Type.........................................................................................................PF-21
Table PF-5: Recycling Programs.............................................................................................................PF-23
TablePF-6: Disposal Rates.....................................................................................................................PF-24
TablePS-1: Fire Stations...........................................................................................................................PS-4
TablePS-2: Police Stations.....................................................................................................................PS-10
Table PS-3: Suitability of Development in Seismic/Geologic Hazard Areas...........................................PS-26
Table PS-4: Typical Sound Levels...........................................................................................................PS-36
TableHE-1: Population Growth.................................................................................................................HE-5
TableHE-2: Age Distribution......................................................................................................................HE-7
TableHE-3: School Enrollment..................................................................................................................HE-7
Table HE-4: Educational Attainment(Age 25+)...................................................... .. ... ...........................HE-7
Table HE-5: Racial Characteristics............................................................................................................HE-8
TableHE-6: MSA Statistics........................................................................................................................HE-9
Table HE-7: Employment Characteristics by Occupation..........................................................................HE-9
Table HE-8: Employment Characteristics by Industry.............................................................................HE-10
TableHE-9: Employment Status..............................................................................................................HE-10
TableHE-10: Per Capita Income...............................................................................................................HE-11
TableHE-11: Poverty Status......................................................................................................................HE-11
Table HE-12: Household Characteristics...................................................................................................HE-12
Table HE-13: Household Income Profile by Household Type...................................................................HE-14
Table HE-14: Overcrowding by Tenure .....................................................................................................HE-15
Table HE-15: Housing Cost Burden (Overpayment(>30%)).....................................................................HE-15
Table HE-16: Housing Cost Burden (Severe Overpayment(>50%))........................................................HE-16
Table HE-17: Housing Cost Burden (Total Households)...........................................................................HE-16
Table HE-18: Incidence of Substandard Factors.......................................................................................HE-17
Table HE-19: Large Families by Tenure....................................................................................................HE-20
TableHE-20: Housing Growth...................................................................................................................HE-22
TableHE-21: Housing Unit Type...............................................................................................................HE-23
TableHE-22: Housing Tenure...................................................................................................................HE-23
Table HE-23: Vacancy Rate by Unit Type.................................................................................................HE-24
TableHE-24: Age of Housing Stock..........................................................................................................HE-24
Table HE-25: Change in Median Home Prices..........................................................................................HE-25
Table HE-26: Median Sale Prices by Unit Type.........................................................................................HE-25
TableHE-27: Housing Rents.....................................................................................................................HE-26
Table HE-28: Housing Affordability in Rancho Cucamonga......................................................................HE-26
Table HE-29: Subsidized Multi-Family Housing.........................................................................................HE-28
Table HE-30: Estimated Market Value of Units At-Risk.............................................................................HE-29
Table HE-31: Unit Replacement Cost........................................................................................................HE-30
TableHE-32: Affordable Units...................................................................................................................HE-30
Table HE-33: Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA), 2006 to 2014 ...............................................HE-34
Table HE-34: General Plan Designations and Development Code Districts.............................................HE-35
Table HE-35: Permitted Housing Types by Land Use District...................................................................HE-36
Table HE-36: Basic Development Standards............................................................................................HE-42
Table HE-37: Optional Development Standards........................................................................................HE-43
Table HE-38: Terra Vista Community Plan Development Standards........................................................HE-44
Table HE-39: Victoria Community Plan Development Standards..............................................................HE-45
Table HE-40: Multi-Family Parking Standards...........................................................................................HE-46
Table HE-41: Density Bonus Provisions Parking Standards.....................................................................HE-46
Table HE-42: Planning Department Application Fees...............................................................................HE-50
Table HE-43: Residential Development Fees............................................................................................HE-51
Table HE-44: Proportion of Fee In Overall Development Cost for a Typical Residential Development....HE-52
Table HE-45: Development Review Timeline............................................................................................HE-54
Table HE-46: Regulatory Concessions......................................................................................................HE-57
Table HE-47: Credits Towards the RHNA.................................................................................................HE-62
iv RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN
Table HE-48: Projected Unit Development from Vacant Uncommitted Land............................................HE-65
Table HE-49: Estimated Housing Units Available at Build-Out..................................................................HE-66
Table HE-50: Demonstrating Capacity—Developable Vacant Residential Sites......................................HE-67
Table HE-51: Affordable Housing Development Regulatory Concessions................................................HE-69
Table HE-52: Mixed Use Residential Development Potential....................................................................HE-70
Table HE-53: Housing Production Requirement December 23, 1981 to August 6, 2027..........................HE-76
Table HE-54: RDA 20 Percent Housing Set-Aside Fund Projections........................................................HE-78
TableHE-55: RDA Land Bank...................................................................................................................HE-79
Table HE-56: RDA Vacant Land Resources..............................................................................................HE-80
List of Figures
Figure 1-1: Rancho Cucamonga, Regional Context..................................................................................1-10
Figure1-2: Planning Area ..........................................................................................................................1-11
Figure LU-1: Floor-Area Ratio(FAR)..........................................................................................................LU-9
FigureLU-2: Land Use Plan.....................................................................................................................LU-11
FigureLU-3: Mixed Use Areas..................................................................................................................LU-23
FigureLU-4: Focus Areas.........................................................................................................................LU-43
Figure LU-5: Specific Plans and Planned Communities...........................................................................LU-51
Figure LU-6: Community Design Framework...........................................................................................LU-75
Figure LU-7: Entry Monument Locations..................................................................................................LU-82
Figure LU-8: Historic Resources.............................................................................................................LU-109
Figure CM-1: General Roadway Hierarchy.................................................................................................CM-7
Figure CM-2: Circulation Plan.....................................................................................................................CM-9
Figure CM-3: Typical Roadway Cross Sections.......................................................................................CM-13
FigureCM-4: Transit Plan.........................................................................................................................CM-19
Figure CM-5: Local Transit Service Areas................................................................................................CM-23
Figure CM-6: Bicycle Cross Sections.......................................................................................................CM-27
FigureCM-7: Bicycle Plan ........................................................................................................................CM-29
FigureCM-8: Truck Routes.......................................................................................................................CM-35
Figure ED-1: Redevelopment Project Area.................................................................................................ED-4
Figure CS-1: Parks and Facilities Plan .......................................................................................................CS-7
Figure CS-2: Trail Credit Graph................................................................................................................CS-18
Figure CS-3: Hiking and Riding Trails Plan...............................................................................................CS-19
Figure RC-1: Open Space and Conservation Plan.................................................................................... RC-5
Figure RC-2: Regionally Significant Aggregate Resources....................................................................... RC-9
Figure RC-3: Water Resources................................................................................................................ RC-19
Figure RC-4: Sensitive Biological Resources........................................................................................... RC-31
Figure PF-1: Public Facilities......................................................................................................................PF-7
Figure PF-2: Schools and School Districts...............................................................................................PF-11
Figure PS-1: Fire Hazards Severity Zones.................................................................................................PS-5
FigurePS-2: Fault Hazards Map...............................................................................................................PS-13
Figure PS-3: Geotechnical Hazards .........................................................................................................PS-17
FigurePS-4: Slopes..................................................................................................................................PS-19
Figure PS-5: Flood Hazard Zones............................................................................................................PS-23
Figure PS-6: Dam Inundation Hazards.....................................................................................................PS-27
Figure PS-7: Airspace Protection Areas...................................................................................................PS-31
Figure PS-8: Noise Compatibility Matrix...................................................................................................PS-39
Figure PS-9: Existing Noise Contours-2009...........................................................................................PS-41
Figure PS-10:Future Noise Contours-2030 .............................................................................................PS-45
Figure HEA: Population Distribution by Age...............................................................................................HE-6
Figure HE-2: Mean Income Levels............................................................................................................HE-13
Figure HE-3: Vacant Uncommitted Residential Land................................................................................HE-65
Figure HE-4: Terra Vista Community Plan—High Residential District Development Potential................HE-68
Figure HE-5: Victoria Community Plan—High Residential District Development Potential .....................HE-68
FigureHE-6: Planning Areas.....................................................................................................................HE-75
Figure HE-7: Existing vs. Projected Units December 23, 1981, to Build-Out...........................................HE-75
RANCHO CUCAMONGA GEN E RAL PLAN v
Figure HE-8: Production Units Required December 23, 1981, to Build-Out.............................................HE-76
Figure HE-9: Redevelopment Area—Mandated Production Units, December 23, 1981 to Build-Out.....HE-77
FigureHE-10:RDA Land Bank Map...........................................................................................................HE-79
Figure HE-11:RDA Vacant Land Resources Map......................................................................................HE-80
vi RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN
\ 1
Appendix A:
Implementation Plan
RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENER A L P L A N
Introduction
This Implementation Plan will guide City elected officials, Commissions and
Committees, staff, and the public in the overall effort to put into practice the adopted
General Plan goals and policies. The Implementation Plan identifies the programs
and procedures that will be used to put General Plan goals and policies into action.
Each implementation action is a procedure, program, or approach that requires City
action, either independently or in collaboration with other government and private
organizations and agencies. Some of the implementation measures are processes
or procedures that the City currently administers on a day-to-day basis (such as
development project reviews), while others identify new programs or projects.
Completion of the identified measures will be subject to funding availability and
priorities set by the City Council as part of the annual budgeting process.
Thus, the Implementation Actions will be reviewed annually as part of the budget
review and adjusted as necessary. Changes to Implementation Actions do not
constitute an amendment to the General Plan. Rather, this Implementation Plan will
assist the City Council and Department heads in the strategic allocation of budget
resources to achieve the goals, policies, and objectives set forth in the General
Plan.
Implementation Plan Tables
The Implementation Plan is structured in a table format, with the table identifying
the following for each Implementation Action:
Policy Reference Provides the specific Policy citation or reference number as it is
listed in the main body of the General Plan document.
Indicates whether a Policy is to be carried out through the City's
Action Type project review process or through a specific initiative. Both may be
applicable in some cases.
General Plan Policy/ Provides the complete text of the policy statement as it is listed in
Implementation the main body of the General Plan document, with the proposed
Action(s) action to be taken indicated beneath the policy.
Primary Shows the organization or department primarily responsible for
Responsibility carrying out the action.
Supporting Shows the organization or department supporting the primary
Responsibility organization or department responsible for carrying out the action.
Funding Source Indicates the general categories of funding that may be used to
carry out a proposed action.
Priority Indicates the priority attached to an action.
Appendix A:Implementation Plan
RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN A-1
Implementation Plan Tables Codes
The Implementation Plan table uses codes to represent certain words,
organizations, departments, funding sources, and descriptions of intended
prioritization. These codes are:
Action Type is noted with a circle (0) in the appropriate column(s). These
notations are always shown on the policy line because implementation actions
may vary over time even if the policy remains the same.
Primary and Supporting Responsibilities are indicated by abbreviations for the
corresponding organizations:
City Departments
AC Animal Care and Services Department
AS Administrative Services Department
BS Building and Safety Department
CM City Manager's Office
CS Community Services Department
ENG Engineering Department
FD Fire Department
FIN Finance Department
LIB Library Services Department
PD Police Department
PL Planning Department
PW Public Works Services Department
RD Redevelopment/Community and Economic Development
Non-Rancho Cucamonga Agencies/Organizations
AQ South Coast Air Quality Management District
CA State of California
CW Cucamonga Valley Water District
FC Flood Control District
LFO Local Agency Formation Commission
SBC San Bernardino County
SBG San Bernardino Associated Governments
SD School District
Us Federal Government Agency
Funding Sources are indicated as follows:
A General Fund
B Special Assessment District
C Community Facilities District
D Impact Fee/Service Fee
E State Loan or Grant
F Federal Grant
G Redevelopment Tax Increment
H Public/Private Partnership
I User/Application Fees
J Enterprise Funds
K Minimal/Absorbed Cost
Appendix A:Implementation Plan
A-Z RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN
Priorities are described as follows:
1. Current. The action is already underway and should be completed as
soon as possible. This is an action or activity that has already been
initiated, for example, a special study that simply needs to be finished.
2. Urgent.The action should be initiated within this or the next fiscal year. It
is required by law or critical for completion of other important tasks. An
example would be a change in the Development Code to implement the
Mixed Use designation in the General Plan.
3. Important. The action is necessary to prevent an urgent condition in the
near future. It is usually necessary for completion of other tasks. An
example would be the determination of infrastructure maintenance cost
requirements to prevent even more costly repairs in the future.
4. Ongoing. The action is a continuous one or continuation of an existing
program or activity within that program. This policy is brought to bare on
future decisions and requires no further implementation activity prior to that
time. This designation does not imply a low level of priority; rather, it is
something that is already being done or has a repetitive pattern that reflects
a basic function that is always performed. An example would be the
processing of zone change and subdivision/parcel map applications.
6. Desirable. The action would serve the community well and should be
undertaken if at all possible. It may require completion of other actions first.
Failure to do so within a reasonable period of time would move this up the
priority scale.
6. Optional. This action is of relatively low priority, but desirable. It is not
critical to other tasks. An example would be the exploration of the potential
for joint historic preservation programs with adjacent jurisdictions.
7. Completed. The action has been taken or the program initiated. This
designation is a way to track status, and a particular entry may be dropped
after any necessary reporting related to it is completed. An example would
be the completion of Development Code changes related to the General
Plan update and dropping the listing once it is included in an annual report
to the State on General Plan implementation.
Appendix A:Implementation Plan
RANCHO CUCAMONGA G E N E RAL PLAN A 3
,� \
Wool
J SIGN-IN SHEET
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
RANCHO
CUCAMONGA MAY 22, 2013
NAME COMPANY ADDRESS/EMAIL