Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2013-10-09 - Agenda Packet - HPC / PC i FOA�L • THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA THE REGULAR MEETINGS OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 9, 2013 - 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER • Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call Chairman Howdyshell _ Vice Chairman Fletcher_ Munoz_ Wimberly_ Oaxaca _ II. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Historic Preservation Commission or Planning Commission, not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any activity which might III. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND PRESENTATIONS • HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION • AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA CCHO� OCTOBER 9, 2013 Page 2 IV. CONSENT CALENDAR/HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION A. Approval of minutes dated September 25, 2013 V. DIRECTOR'S REPORTS/PLANNING COMMISSION B. ADOPTION OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION ADMINISTRATIVE GUIDELINES VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS/PLANNING COMMISSION The following items have been advertised and/orposted as public hearings as required bylaw. The • Chairman will open the public hearing to receive testimony. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. Please sign in after speaking. C. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19481 — BONALDO ENGINEERING FOR PV RANCHO, LLC: A request to subdivide a parcel of about 98,900 square feet (2.27 acres) that is currently developed with two (2) buildings with a combined floor area of about 26,700 square feet into thirteen (13) units for condominium purposes in the Industrial Park (IP) District located at 10801 and 10803 Foothill Boulevard; APN: 0208-353-24. Related files: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16488 and Development Review DRC2003-00988. On May 12, 2004, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was adopted by the Planning Commission for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16488 and Development Review DRC2003-00988. Per Section 15162, no further environmental review is required for subsequent projects or minor revisions to projects within the scope of a previous Negative Declaration. VII. COMMISSION CONCERNS/HISTORIC PRESERVATION AND PLANNING COMMISSION • • HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO OCTOBER 9, 2013 CUCAMONGA Page 3 VIII. ADJOURNMENT 1, Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on October 3, 2013, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. • INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak,given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After speaking, please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium. It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under"Public Comments." There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda. Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. A copy of any such materials should also be provided to the Secretary to be used for the official public record. All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. Requests for scheduling agenda items will be at the discretion of the Commission and the Planning Director. AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning • Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7'00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., except for legal City holidays. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION • AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA g�rcxo OCTOBER 9, 2013 CuceeroNw Page 4 APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of$2,486 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas, staff reports and minutes can be found at www.CityofRC.us • • Vicinity Map Historic Preservation and Planning Commission Meeting October 9 , 2013 E E a2 ttyaa AD 19th St Base Lin e J' O rI Base Line nChurch Church Foothill Foothill N E ix Arrow A Arrow m J rsey = 8th a° w __ I m � h a a c 6th w t € m s V ? - � O A C 4th a _ 4th * Meeting Location: City Hall/Council Chamber! 10500 Civic Center Drive Item A: Approval of Regular Meeting Minutes dated September 25, 2013 Item B: Adoption of an Amendment to the Planning Commission and Historic Preservation Commission Guidelines THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA THE MINUTES OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 25, 2013 - 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER Pledge of Allegiance 70OPM • Roll Call Chairman Howdyshell X Vice Chairman Fletcher X Munoz X Wimberly X Oaxaca X II. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to rive minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Historic Preservation Commission or Planning Commission, not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. None • Item A—t HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION • AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES SEPTEMBER 25, 2013 CocnewNGA Page 2 III. CONSENT CALENDAR/HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION A. Approval of Special Meeting Minutes Dated August 14, 2013 Moved by Wimberly, seconded by Fletcher to adopt the minutes of August 14, 2013. Carried 5-0 B. Approval of Regular Meeting Minutes Dated August 28, 2013 Moved by Wimberly, seconded by Fletcher to adopt the minutes of August 28, 2013, Carried 4-0-1 (Oaxaca abstain) IV. DIRECTOR'S REPORTS/PLANNING COMMISSION C. PRESENTATION ON THE HEALTHY RC STRATEGIC PLAN • Michael Parmer, gave a PowerPoint presentation (copy on file) and facilitated the discussion. He noted that the data was collected from various sources. In response to Commissioners Fletcher and Wimberly, he said he would provide the source of the 57% obesity rate. In response to Vice Chairman Fletcher he said programs have originated from various places such as Mrs. Obama and the"Let's Move"campaign. He said our initiative is City lead and community driven. He said promoting healthy living is multifaceted including school programs and that our effort is looking for a collective impact. He noted that this program is 100%grant funded. In response to Chairman Howdyshell, he said the medical community is at the table including Kaiser, San Antonio Hospital and IEHP as well as representatives for farmers markets and restaurants. He said the October 10 event will include the City's health plan providers as well and community members will be given opportunities to weigh in interactively, participate in group discussions, have children's' activities and receive a free meal all towards the goal of gathering information that will influence the development of the Healthy RC Strategic Plan. In response to Commissioner Oaxaca, Mr. Parmer said success is defined more from quantitative analysis and that an evaluation is part of a grant that will be completed in December. He also noted that there is a Healthy RC dining program that encourages restaurants to participate. He said with respect to specific efforts towards young children that funding for two more years has been secured for the First Five program and within the City, we now have rooms for nursing mothers, a baby supply vending machine and spots on the healthy living TV show whereby the first 5 minutes of the show is dedicated to very young children and their needs. He said this is on Charter Channel 3 TV. Commissioner Munoz asked what part addresses the needs of seniors such as isolation, medication and in some cases, abuse. Mr. Farmer said there is a focus on healthy eating • Item A-2 • HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES SEPTEMBER 25, 2013 C§MNOA Page 3 and living classes and that the reach out process to find out their concerns such as accident prevention and healthcare issues, will include the VIP group and the Senior Advisory Board, Candyce Burnett, Planning Manager, noted they are a target focus group on the survey. Mr. Parmer encouraged the Commission to add any ideas on how to reach out or communicate with more people on the survey form. Chairman Howdyshell said it was a great report and she learned a lot. She asked that he come back after the event. Ms. Burnett said we can bring back more on the Strategic Plan as it develops and additional documents and lists of members that have been at the meetings can also be made available. V. PUBLIC HEARINGS/PLANNING COMMISSION The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required bylaw. The Chairman will open the public hearing to receive testimony. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 • minutes per individual for each project Please sign In after speaking. D. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00018 - PULTE HOMES - STEVEN FORD - A request to construct 53 single-family homes within Tentative Tract 18741 on 40.12 acres of land within the Very Low Residential District of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan at the northwest corner of Wilson avenue and Wardman Bullock Road -APN: 0226-081-05 and 06. Related files: Minor Exception DRC2013-00780 and Tentative Tract SUBTT18741. On January 9, 2013, a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts was adopted by the Planning Commission for Tentative Tract Map 18741. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects or minor revisions to projects within the scope of the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. E. MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2013-00780- PULTE HOMES-A request to allow for an 8-foot tall wall along the north and west tract boundary within Tentative Tract 18741 for compliance with the proposed Fire Protection Plan on 40.12 acres of land in the Very Low Residential (VL) District of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan, located at the northwest corner of Wardman Bullock Road and Wilson Avenue-APN: 0226-081-05&06.On January 9, 2013, a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts was adopted by the Planning Commission for Tentative Tract Map 18741, The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects or minor revisions to projects within the scope of the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. Related Files: Development Review 2013-00018 and Tentative Tract SUBTT18741. • Item A-3 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION . AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES SEPTEMBER 25, 2013 C"CA"ON0A Page 4 Steve Fowler, Assistant Planner, gave the staff report and PowerPoint presentation (copy on file). In response to Commissioner Oaxaca asked about the implementation of the Fire Protection Plan. Mr. Fowler said the requirement is related to the location of the project. Candyce Burnett, Planning Manager said the site is located in a very high fire zone and the plan stipulates special measures such as the wall height. Commissioner Munoz said the plan even specifies what you can plant and where. Steve Ford said he is representing Pulte. He said it was a long process and the Fire Protection Plan caused much discussion and a modification of their plans. He said with grading changes a great deal of hauling was eliminated. Chairman Howdyshell opened the public hearing. Thomas Gooch, a resident of the Brentwood development indicated his support of the project but asked about the Wilson extension because of the school traffic congestion. • Dan James, Senior Engineer, said the Wilson extension is on the list for Capital improvement projects. He said essentially the design work is done from Wardman Bullock to East Avenue. He said they hope to start construction next May or June. He said there have been challenges with respect to the environmental clearances needed and the timeline is dependent upon that. He said for the section beyond East Avenue to Etiwanda Avenue, the developer of that property is aware of our concerns and they have indicated they plan to move forward with their project. The street improvements for that section will be a requirement for that developer. Nancy Millet said she is-in favor of the project because of the larger homes and better quality development. She said she too would like Wilson to go through to remedy the traffic. Chairman Howdyshell closed the public hearing Commissioner Munoz said it is a good project, well designed, and he's glad it is all single story with a good level of design. He offered kudos to staff and the DRC. Moved by Munoz, seconded by Wimberly, to adopt Resolutions 13-39 and 13-40 approving Development Review DRC2013-00018 and Minor Exception DRC2013-00780. Carried 5-0. • Item A-4 • HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES WwHO SEPTEMBER 25, 2013 CUCAMONGA Page 5 F. ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT DRC2013-00519 - MCALANS PUB AND GRILL - JASON SHAW -A request to have live entertainment such as a DJ, six piece band, and dancing within an existing restaurant in the Neighborhood Commercial District located at 6321 Haven Avenue-APN: 0201-272-06. This action is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301, existing facilities. Steve Fowler, Assistant Planner, gave the staff report and PowerPoint presentation (copy on file). He noted a letter was received in opposition from neighboring homeowners because of noise issues. Candyce Burnett, Planning Manager noted a condition can be added to the resolution requiring a review in 6 months if the Commission desires it. Jason Shaw stated he is the new owner. In response to Chairman Howdyshell, he said this is his first time to run a restaurant with alcohol service and entertainment. He said his experience is as a LAPD officer in the Hollywood entertainment district and he has trained security staff. He said he has not had any incidents thus far and will not allow the prior • incidents to happen again. In response to Vice Chairman Fletcher, he said the doors are closed 90% of the time. He confirmed the occupancy is 196 persons and there is no amplification in the patio area. Chairman Howdyshell opened the public hearing. Hearing and seeing no comment, she closed the public hearing. Moved by Fletcher, seconded by Munorto adopt Resolution 13-38 approving Entertainment Permit DRC2013-00519 with the added condition for a review by the Commission in 6 months. VI. COMMISSION CONCERNS/HISTORIC PRESERVATION AND PLANNING COMMISSION Commissioner Munoz reported that he attended the League of California Cities conference. He noted that the league acts as an advocacy agency that City Managers and Mayors look to for needed changes in legislation, specifically when City funds are affected. He asked if the question raised by Chairman Howdyshell in the minutes regarding ADA facilities found on page B-2 had been answered by staff He also mentioned the great photo of the Planning staff at the Maloof complex. Chairman Howdyshell responded that the question had not been answered as yet. • Item A-5 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION • AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANcHO SEPTEMBER 25, 2013 CUCAMONGA Page 6 Candyce Burnett, Planning Manager said staff would make the contact and gain a response and report back to the Commission. Commissioner Wimberly thanked staff and the City Council for the lovely event honoring the Boards and Commissions. Chairman Howdyshell noted that she saw the RC Spotlight and offered kudos to the Planning Department for their being highlighted in this presentation. Commissioner Oaxaca acknowledged and commended Manning Homes for opening up their property to the community for a "vine rescue". He said this was an example of how we worked effectively with an applicant to preserve what is important about Rancho Cucamonga's heritage. Vice Chairman Fletcher said he was pleased to see the ad about the vine rescue and also commended Jim Manning for their part in restoring the Toews House. He asked if the City can facilitate traffic on routes to schools or if schools regulate that. Steven Flower,Assistant City Attorney noted that our jurisdiction is limited with the schools'sites • and schedules; we try to work with them to reconfigure their parking lots forbetter circulation, but the City cannot directly control the school sites.. Jeff Bloom, Deputy City Manager, Economic&Community Development noted that the City does meet regularly with the school districts. The Engineering department will try to resolve specific traffic issues with them. He mentioned that we again have a full time traffic engineer and we have more staff time to keep addressing these issues. He said with the losses of bus service, there are more cars and therefore a higher degree of traffic. He said there is progress related to the Wilson Avenue extension project; the timeline is dependent upon the review from the regulatory agencies. VII. ADJOURNMENT 8:45PM If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. • Item A-fi • HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES SEPTEMBER 25, 2013 CUCMoNw Page 7 INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak,given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position,you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After speaking, please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium. It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak conceming an item not on the agenda, you may do so under"Public Comments." There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda. • Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. A copy of any such materials should also be provided to the Secretary to be used for the official public record. All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. Requests for scheduling agenda items will be at the discretion of the Commission and the Planning Director. AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., except for legal City holidays. APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of$2,486 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas, staff reports and minutes can be found at www.CitvofRC.us. • Itam G_7 • STAFF REPORT PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE: October 9, 2013 RANCHO TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission C,UCAMONGA FROM: Candyce Burnett, Planning Manager BY: Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION ADMINISTRATIVE GUIDELINES RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Commissioners adopt the amendment to their Administrative Guidelines. BACKGROUND: The Planning Commission Administrative Guidelines were first adopted by the City Council in 1979. They were amended twice in 1988 and 1993, and various other policies have been implemented from time to time. A major update to the regulations was prepared and presented to the Planning Commission August 22, 2012 shown as Exhibit A. That update included a streamlining of meetings and procedural rules, a new agenda format and procedures related to the preparation of minutes. Since that time, a correction to the Chair term limits was noted. The draft revised document is shown as Exhibit B. Chair Term Limits • In November of 2002, a memorandum recommending a policy to limit the Chairman holding his/her position for no more than three consecutive years was presented to the City Council. The original recommendation of the memo was changed and adopted by the City Council to limit the chair position to only 2 consecutive years instead of 3 years as stated in the memo. This policy was misstated in the 2012 updated version of the Planning Commission Regulations as 3 years. A text revision to correct the term limit of the Chairman's position to two years is proposed to be in conformance with the adopted City Council policy. CONCLUSION: Staff concludes that the current Planning Commission Regulations are in need of a corrective amendment. Staff encourages the Commission to review the change presented by staff and to adopt the new revised Guidelines by minute action. Added text is shown in bold, deleted text in ski. Respectf t submitted, Candyce nett Planning Manager CB:LS Attachments: Exhibit A Current Planning Commission Administrative Guidelines (2012) Exhibit B Draft revised Planning Commission and Historic Preservation Commission Guidelines • Item B-1 • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION GUIDELINES 1. Purpose: These guidelines are intended to help the Planning Commission, the Historic Preservation Commission (collectively "Commission"), and staff function more efficiently and effectively and are designed to comply with the Municipal Code and applicable State law, including the Ralph M. Brown Act. 2. Election and Duties of Officers: The Commission shall elect a Chair and a Vice-Chair from its appointed members, who shall serve for a term of one year and until their successors are elected. The Chair and Vice-Chair of the Planning Commission shall also serve as the respective Chair and Vice-Chair of the Historic Preservation Commission. No Commissioner shall serve as Chair for more than three consecutive terms. Elections shall occur at the first regular Commission meeting in July of each year, or as soon thereafter as is practical. Any vacancy shall be filled by an election held at the first regular meeting after the occurrence of the vacancy. • The Chair shall preside at all meetings of the Commission and may move, second, and debate from the chair in the same manner as all other Commissioners. The Vice-Chair shall act as the Chair in the Chair's absence. In the event of absence of both the Chair and Vice-Chair, the remaining members of the Commission shall elect a temporary Chair from among the remaining members. 3. Meetings: Regular meetings of the Commission shall be held the second and fourth Wednesdays of each month at 7:00 p.m., unless modified by City Council action. Meetings of the Planning Commission and the Historic Preservation Commission may be held concurrently. The Commission may call Special meetings as necessary, consistent with the noticing requirements of the Ralph M. Brown Act. 4. Minutes The Planning Director shall be responsible for preparing the minutes of each Commission Meeting. Approval of the minutes may occur as part of the Commission's consent calendar. A Commissioner may abstain from voting on the approval of minutes for meetings for which he or she is absent. • EXHIBIT A Item B-2 5. Order of the Agenda: • Matters shall be heard in the order printed on the agenda, provided that the Chair may reorder the agenda if it determines that it is in the public interest to do so. The standard agenda format is as follows: • Pledge of Allegiance • Roll Call • Public Communications • Consent Calendar/Historic Preservation Commission • Consent Calendar/Planning Commission • Director's Reports/Historic Preservation Commission • Director's Reports/Planning Commission • Scheduled Matters/Historic Preservation Commission • Scheduled Matters/Planning Commission • Public Hearings/Historic Preservation Commission • Public Hearings/Planning Commission • Commission Concerns • Adjournment 6. Setting the Agenda: The Chair shall work with the Planning Director to set the Commission agenda. • Any Commissioner may request an item be placed on an upcoming agenda with the Chair's concurrence. Staff shall schedule matters pursuant to the requirements and timeframes of the Municipal Code and all other legal requirements. 7. Voting: Each Commissioner who is present at a meeting shall vote on all agenda items unless he or she has a conflict of interest. Unless a Commissioner states a reason for not voting, failure to vote shall be recorded as an affirmative vote. A tie vote on any motion shall be construed as follows: A. On any matter where the Commission is acting in an advisory capacity on a legislative action (i.e., General Plan, Specific Plan, etc.) the action shall be forwarded to the City Council with no recommendation. B. On any other matter, including where the Commission is acting in a quasi- judicial capacity on a discretionary action (i.e., conditional use permit, variance, etc.), the motion shall fail. • 2 Item B-3 • 8. Meeting Time Limits: The Commission shall not consider any new agenda item after 11:00 p.m. No later than 10:45 p.m., the Commission shall vote on whether to continue the meeting until the remaining agenda items are resolved or to a future date. The Commission shall adjourn all meetings no later than 11:59 p.m. on the date the meeting started. The Commission may waive or modify these time limits by majority vote. 9. Rules of Order: A. The Chair shall preserve order and decorum at all meetings, state questions coming before the Commission, announce its decisions on all subjects, and rule on all points of order. Any Commissioner may appeal the rulings of the Chair on points or order to the entire Commission. Such appeals shall be decided by a majority vote of the Commission. B. All persons in attendance at a Commission meeting, including Commissioners, shall preserve the order and decorum of the meeting and shall neither by conversation or otherwise, delay or interrupt the orderly and peaceful proceedings of the meeting. • C. The Chair may establish such rules as are necessary to control public debate to avoid irrelevant or repetitive remarks. No member of the public shall speak more than once during the same meeting as to the same question, nor longer than 5 minutes at a time without leave of the Chair. The Chair may establish a shorter time period for speakers if announced before the beginning of the agenda item or public hearing thereon. D. A motion to adjourn shall always be in order and shall be decided without debate. 10. Absences: Every Commissioner shall attend every regular or special meeting of the Commission unless otherwise unavailable. As soon as any Commissioner has reason to believe that he or she will not be able to attend a meeting, the Commissioner shall notify the Planning Director of the anticipated absence. 11. Planning Commission Information Requests: Commissioners may from time to time seek information about general issues within the community. Staff shall follow-up and provide information to the Planning Commission in order to keep it informed. This may be done outside a Planning Commission meeting and should not be construed as the Planning • Commission directing the work of staff. 3 Item B-4 12. Conflicts of Interests: • It is the responsibility of each Planning Commissioner to know and understand the conflict of interest rules. Whenever a Commissioner has reason to believe he or she has a conflict of interest involving any item on a Commission agenda, the Commissioner shall, to the extent, possible notify the Planning Director and the City Attorney in advance of the meeting. • • 4 Item B-5 • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION GUIDELINES 1. Purpose: These guidelines are intended to help the Planning Commission, the Historic Preservation Commission (collectively "Commission"), and staff function more efficiently and effectively and are designed to comply with the Municipal Code and applicable State law, including the Ralph M. Brown Act. 2. Election and Duties of Officers: The Commission shall elect a Chair and a Vice-Chair from its appointed members, who shall serve for a term of one year and until their successors are elected. The Chair and Vice-Chair of the Planning Commission shall also serve as the respective Chair and Vice-Chair of the Historic Preservation Commission. No Commissioner shall serve as Chair for more than t# two consecutive terms. Elections shall occur at the first regular Commission meeting in July of each year, or as soon thereafter as is practical. Any vacancy shall be filled by an election held at the first regular meeting after the occurrence of the vacancy. • The Chair shall preside at all meetings of the Commission and may move, second, and debate from the chair in the same manner as all other Commissioners. The Vice-Chair shall act as the Chair in the Chair's absence. In the event of absence of both the Chair and Vice-Chair, the remaining members of the Commission shall elect a temporary Chair from among the remaining members. 3. Meetings: Regular meetings of the Commission shall be held the second and fourth Wednesdays of each month at 7:00 p.m., unless modified by City Council action. Meetings of the Planning Commission and the Historic Preservation Commission may be held concurrently. The Commission may call Special meetings as necessary, consistent with the noticing requirements of the Ralph M. Brown Act. 4. Minutes The Planning Director shall be responsible for preparing the minutes of each Commission Meeting. Approval of the minutes may occur as part of the Commission's consent calendar. A Commissioner may abstain from voting on the approval of minutes for meetings for which he or she is absent. • v Revised October 9, 2013 1 EXHIBIT B Item B-6 5. Order of the Agenda: • Matters shall be heard in the order printed on the agenda, provided that the Chair may reorder the agenda if it determines that it is in the public interest to do so. The standard agenda format is as follows: • Pledge of Allegiance • Roll Call Public Communications Consent Calendar/Historic Preservation Commission • Consent Calendar/Planning Commission • Director's Reports/Historic Preservation Commission • Director's Reports/Planning Commission • Scheduled Matters/Historic Preservation Commission • Scheduled Matters/Planning Commission • Public Hearings/Historic Preservation Commission • Public Hearings/Planning Commission • Commission Concerns Adjournment 6. Setting the Agenda: The Chair shall work with the Planning Director to set the Commission agenda. • Any Commissioner may request an item be placed on an upcoming agenda with the Chair's concurrence. Staff shall schedule matters pursuant to the requirements and timeframes of the Municipal Code and all other legal requirements. 7. Voting: Each Commissioner who is present at a meeting shall vote on all agenda items unless he or she has a conflict of interest. Unless a Commissioner states a reason for not voting, failure to vote shall be recorded as an affirmative vote. A tie vote on any motion shall be construed as follows: A. On any matter where the Commission is acting in an advisory capacity on a legislative action (i.e., General Plan, Specific Plan, etc.) the action shall be forwarded to the City Council with no recommendation. B. On any other matter, including where the Commission is acting in a quasi- judicial capacity on a discretionary action (i.e., Conditional Use Permit, Variance, etc.), the motion shall fail. • Revised October 9, 2013 2 Item B-7 • 8. Meeting Time Limits: The Commission shall not consider any new agenda item after 11:00 p.m. No later than 10:45 p.m., the Commission shall vote on whether to continue the meeting until the remaining agenda items are resolved or to a future date. The Commission shall adjourn all meetings no later than 11:59 p.m. on the date the meeting started. The Commission may waive or modify these time limits by majority vote. 9. Rules of Order: A. The Chair shall preserve order and decorum at all meetings, state questions coming before the Commission, announce its decisions on all subjects, and rule on all points of order. Any Commissioner may appeal the rulings of the Chair on points of order to the entire Commission. Such appeals shall be'decided by a majority vote of the Commission. B. All persons in attendance at a Commission meeting, including Commissioners, shall preserve the order and decorum of the meeting and shall neither by conversation or otherwise, delay or interrupt the orderly and peaceful proceedings of the meeting. • C. The Chair may establish such rules as are necessary to control public debate to avoid irrelevant or repetitive remarks. No member of the public shall speak more than once during the same meeting as to the same question, nor longer than 5 minutes at a time without leave of the Chair. The Chair may establish a shorter time period for speakers if announced before the beginning of the agenda item or public hearing thereon. D. A motion to adjourn shall always be in order and shall be decided without debate. 10. Absences: Every Commissioner shall attend every regular or special meeting of the Commission unless otherwise unavailable. As soon as any Commissioner has reason to believe that he or she will not be able to attend a meeting, the Commissioner shall notify the Planning Director of the anticipated absence. 11. Planning Commission Information Requests: Commissioners may from time to time seek information about general issues within the community. Staff shall follow-up and provide information to the Planning Commission in order to keep it informed. This may be done outside a Planning Commission meeting and should not be construed as the Planning • Commission directing the work of staff. Revised October 9, 2013 3 Item B-8 12. Conflicts of Interest: • It is the responsibility of each Planning Commissioner to know and understand the conflict of interest rules. Whenever a Commissioner has reason to believe he or she has a conflict of interest involving any item on a Commission agenda, the Commissioner shall, to the extent, possible notify the Planning Director and the City Attorney in advance of the meeting. • • Revised October 9, 2013 4 Item B-9 0 STAFF REPORT PLANNINGDEPARTN ENT Date: October 9, 2013 RANCHO To: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission CUCAMONGA From: Candyce Burnett, Planning Manager By: Mike Smith, Associate Planner Subject: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19481 — BONALDO ENGINEERING FOR PV RANCHO, LLC: A request to subdivide a parcel of about 98,900 square feet (2.27 acres) that is currently developed with two (2) buildings with a combined floor area of about 26,700 square feet into thirteen (13) units for condominium purposes in the Industrial Park (IP) District located at 10801 and 10803 Foothill Boulevard; APN: 0208-353-24. Related files: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16488 and Development Review DRC2003-00988. On May 12, 2004, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was adopted by the Planning Commission for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16488 and Development Review DRC2003-00988. Per Section 15162, no further environmental review is required for subsequent projects or minor revisions to projects within the scope of a previous Negative Declaration. • PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Commercial Pad Buildings; Industrial Park (IP) District South - Office Complex; Industrial Park (IP) District East - Office Building; Industrial Park (IP) District West - Restaurant Pad Building; Industrial Park (IP) District B. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Industrial Park North - Industrial Park South - Industrial Park East - Industrial Park West - Industrial Park C. Site Characteristics: The project site is a set of two (2) multi-tenant commercial/office buildings with a combined floor area of about 26,700 square feet located on a parcel (APN: 0208-353-24) of about 98,900 square feet (2.27 acres) with general dimensions of about 500 feet (east to west) by about 210 feet (north to south). The buildings are located between Foothill Boulevard and Laurel Street at 10801 and 10803 Foothill Boulevard (Building 1 and 2, respectively). They were approved by the Planning Commission on May 12, 2004 (related files: Development Review DRC2003-00988 and Tentative Parcel Map SUBPMT16488). Together, with an additional seven (7) buildings located to the west, north, and east of the project site, the subject buildings form part of a larger commercial/office complex. The complex is comprised of seven (7) parcels with a combined area of about 373,000 square feet (8.56 acres) and overall dimensions of about 850 feet • (east to west) by about 370 feet (north to south). The building located to the southeast at 10832 Laurel Street was submitted by the applicant at the same time for review and approval by the Planning Commission (related files: Development Review DRC2003-00987 and Tentative Parcel Item C-1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19481 — BONALDO ENGINEERING FOR PV RANCHO, LLC October 9, 2013 • Page 2 Map SUBTPM16487). The other buildings within the complex were approved by the Planning Commission and constructed at different times by others and are generally unrelated. The zoning of the project site and the properties in all directions is Industrial Park (IP) District. ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant, Bonaldo Engineering on behalf of PV Rancho, LLC, proposes to subdivide the subject parcel into thirteen (13) units for condominium purposes (Exhibit D). Fallowing the subdivision, Building 1 will consist of eight (8) units while Building 2 will consist of five (5) units. The applicant does not propose any physical changes to the site such as modifications to the parking lot, landscaping, or vehicular access/circulation. As the site is fully developed, new construction of, for example, a building or installation of new minor improvements such as parking lot lights, is not proposed. To minimize the potential for problems regarding site maintenance, use, and/or access, a condition of approval has been included in the Resolution of Approval requiring the submittal to the City applicable recorded documentation that establishes, and/or ensures the continuation of, agreements, easements, etc. for the purpose of mutual/reciprocal use, access, parking, and maintenance. B. Grading Technical, and Design Review Committees: As the project is only for the creation of individual units for condominium purposes on a fully developed commercial property and development of the site, i.e. grading, public improvements and/or construction of new buildings is not proposed nor required, staff determined that review by the Committees is not necessary. • C. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQK) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration on May 12, 2004 in connection with the City's approval of Development Review DRC2003-00988 and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16488. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project. No substantial changes are proposed to the project that indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment; no substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicates new or more severe environmental impacts; no new important information shows the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered; and no additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts. There have been no substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previous Negative Declaration. Staff further finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Negative Declaration, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less than significant. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. No comments have been received. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19481 by adoption • of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions. Item C-2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19481 — BONALDO ENGINEERING FOR PV RANCHO, LLC October 9, 2013 • Page 3 Respectfully miffed, Candyce dt4ett Planning Manager CB:MS/Is Attachments: Exhibit A - Location Map Exhibit B - Aerial Photo Exhibit C - Site Utilization Map Exhibit D - Tentative Parcel Map SUBTT19481 Exhibit E - Floor Plans for Buildings 1 and 2 Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19481 • • Item C-3 _ S1YM(AP �+ m BANYAN ST i.. ._IF _ .� — - .�F.. m _—�t!ww._"- '�— "a-��eANrAH �' `� W�ve i .[ -.M .. %cola _ 'mom y¢y¢jX�I FYI p f 31 J01 i _'S�` Lm1'.;ALJ �� �� �; �I y �i _ �imu? s��a• w I� y f p xlcxuxolwG —�� T�la�/ I,vre�-' F IwN �� ] ^_ � ''E �y 1 �• y '� �'�, has zrwuc ninon C. �yp� I c. o 1 19TH ST GA �v[ c1 C, 1Ca I .IP .d @ /ilcrm' [uoa -'°P93xP z 't °� ' _ � Iq } mac ,��•� �_ a� dfi KI Jf 4a t is an 7 • ,'&'leery_ c -�` p � czrc � Ir� � • � _s � tt M^3F a A� .EI I � k iJl� �> Sfallon3 Jml 1-- - '' [MXFmPrt,P w% Nl$TOflIC �r I � vem, mr .�4'�c Z�'1JY,' ��t�•i fTF Ftl, la . � �nwu[evon w•1I WINE MU6�M it � ����� li '� �• ��F.'� PAlO In�'S ,rF U ..mnwrtuR nl' :. L ro ni I PROJECT SITE -4MfYIiAW �.� r [ •�� mms YUSSEA E y � fst St —� Ta ek �iu'wife"Nn �o/qf"��-JU�IV/ APE gyp, -' s . r-- aarvrxmmno� L`9 A. ��. y1 I' I VICTORIA Nc( / GN •Y.M.C.A. TTERRA VISTA mm � F .\ nPsuus n RANCHO .gmrBOQI TOWN CENTER O Mo NC N$TOMEDICAL f II `y � CENTER NDU$E COURT f wormu cPOF»n F, CITY WA I N 9h :ALL.PCUCE HERITAGE' Nil Q— STATIC HOSPITAL M a R isw. wi�n E � w ii.ro FP irrm T S W nmo n mnn r oll Iq1 [ �' DN�a.�� ty` IkRI n Q ,ulCf MD m $ [ n RANCH, nna �q •.ftaNan I ae Menollnk METROLINK TAAIN swnon erH sr e w nnram � w xnuowun I = • PA 1 ¢F 2F (� w �zCOUASA' _ 1 9 p •L_ . , EXHIBIT A I , . 1 V Item.64 ' .i w iti ,... aw d— z Y.' M:.i vazafwis �""s"" ^}; y^w+' ?....,i..µ•i, xwwp-.��,if#lt.%•y`6' 44 F ni • � �� 3. � y .. S,i .. +rte '� e. �� � '^ a " a r..f.w-. ,t+� �.�_ .. .+.. .. E s .rca ,.fir,<•u a•:..ins'1'tt► r _ -♦.., "�: toes •{ ter. �� �£✓ \ , ..-�,� ' r t t n'i"+1 4} �} u*,�N r �` r � e �� , a� 'a.Y N� �' rr � .z •r` �,,..�'"' �i � �„� � r fT Ay 19" ca IC t��•t`..'ayt* r' ,-w "7�.,`�.1ar{ 77 0 71 a a 1SAPt ° vim.. F SaYif is VA i�x,. . c > r• " ''• ,pit >_ ,� s.�1A� .. ° �� '�` rf..{Ifi t' 1 .... s1 e .��S ���= ���;� ,, • :.. •' .'"�t" �� w 'h ��, ' t }'IM rss •Y '� 6p ': ♦ -jy, dd�? ff � ,�. f + 1-X13i1x .r r �.•! 1 -.:.,n. .+Y..�.a..•yy e '+-.."�+mY+�^ aYar ' " `�s'""Y" M sG- .. � m ,# tN 74* k as : 4,Y rl ., • r � sLi� y tk• �1 1, i $., .,'ate .y�,^�'�y.F'" t 6'iTll��. ��il •� I t i+ t ��. M 4- X • 2 IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LnwPw,,.r/rr.]RR s ow,.D.n R Xmr.R uR..r,r,r COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA ,.R.�r ,wrwPR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 19481 HITn NI I.u0. Oxw RaENa 1°7OMIa LI 9q.;92 ]VJ IL - C 522.W 522.W 66 1 P`PMCfL 1 CY PAP'(L Ml✓MJ IGaN AS SMO.w PY YV RfCUKKO W RLY.w IID ML6 9l IMpLw N OI CJ 2L29 9 3 IB II 2 luxe LYDDI MRtEt rWS RROROS M uv¢ERNwPw cwMn✓ C{ 9M 00 1' 6ER9.IXC JW.3OL3 k LR 'souw ez DS I"Iie FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES l Bu A § X R PARCEL4 5�I t q 4I r 11 �A1 y . n t _ di (r✓,�1 'OtK�PRONO ,L ma • d I� 'ti 4 Y "i d • 1 �� -ry r :..1 F L P ECT DESLRIPTHJN }� __ __ 1 � :•• mi¢,.wxann.uwn wrvca BUILDING CODE 61TA - b' FONciRUCTION rvPE _ . fww 1 cIT/vB IL�UIN OWER, fl r•a ✓ I .1 BU/CUING SPRINKLERED. rNa_�inn OCCUPANCY.. Q p m W � ~ - \ S Y P�aaRwcRma nss iON1�rwV 4 •um v •� a rwr� � LAUREL STREET ® o •� ion cc,rr am IO]WVFRAGE Xorono mcr Ra. r°r rr r�. m.rRnr F anr�,w�:vr:.�mu.o'�' � a 5 .R.0 Reev Raw a�MJym °I�d a�aJ mwALmBLDC AREA: TOTAL LANDSCAPE AREA: ALLOWABLE BUILDING ARU: n Iry MWN /UEITLOPER. X PARKINGMSU«MARY 'r ,,� a®mi uo lSr nooR�Av M1W m<� r/rre IFr�r D c RIPIION. w XUi vn�- W c }�� IR.JL FOR M OFME USE aD®Amnll UW nl°F RUG AY e ' yrr mr r+ m s - O L�•/m NOS wu waum aw.rrw..ca �rJ a rr m A 5ESSO SS PA R NO: '!D SOr.RUwrRLE OF WPOGRARHYE 'O- IJc ^r S R OU.AD ° MRP �0 °°'a w'd a�Ro IST FLOOR PLAu � �]I R� (,n�eisi,.-rE rn m,or, nwvr .ry s rar .x� O,I °U STA ASR 4 ' P ��ICR ELEVATION. a'a' _ .u+ww•w W r�nX B4$I5 OF BURING. RMS uarwru wvu.i rMs w (RECCIID PER RI) �Mim nii�i ZONING AND eND 5: yj- Cwn° a°oLR DLI°ne° G"Cb M yrya�a R09D ���� TENTATNE PARCEL MAP NO.IBRR1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA _.namR.r. m'a�ra"�`�co"u.aiw cw, e.oma DLII. SAKE fir_ - _ _.roea nom RXo'.�. x aoeD v w IR 3 L-0 Wa71 a 1191HX3 • B� 6� i5 3 r && iB s §§ • Z y� i i� 1 o !, 9pp p0e 6 F1771Pi c e ttPPPtP 14 1 ! v E ' i '+!i lw9 p fGv y • p ] f o 10801 8 10803 FOOTHILL BLVD. };p 1-1p• � i o D p f ! P 3 °'0 o TEMA�VE PARCEL MAP j�i ll�i! o,•ea n. P ?�'o z o%o � / e i / bonaldo f � engineering r II IDBD3 FOOTHILL BLVD -SECOND BOOB DEMISINO WALL PLAN m 3 d 0 cd o an a ta€ �g a �^ 10803 FOOTHILL f BLVD. DEMISING fWS� WALL PLAN 10803 FOOTHILL SUP, RRST rL DEN;;4'0 WALL P LAN `3 A-2 RESOLUTION NO. 13-41 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19481, A REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE A PARCEL OF ABOUT 98,900 SQUARE FEET(2.27 ACRES)THAT IS CURRENTLY DEVELOPED WITH TWO(2) BUILDINGS WITH A COMBINED FLOOR AREA OF ABOUT 26,700 SQUARE FEET INTO THIRTEEN (13) UNITS FOR OFFICE CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES IN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK (IP) DISTRICT LOCATED AT 10801 AND 10803 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF-APN: 0208-353- 24. A. Recitals. 1. Bonaldo Engineering, on behalf of PV Rancho, LLC, filed an application for the approval of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19481, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Parcel Map request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 9th day of October 2013, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: • 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on October 9, 2013, including written and oral staff reports,together with public testimony,this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to two(2) multi-tenant commercial/office buildings located between Foothill Boulevard and Laurel Street at 10801 and 10803 Foothill Boulevard (Building 1 and 2, respectively); b. The buildings have a combined floor area of about 26,700 square feet and are located on a parcel (APN: 0208-353-24) of about 98,900 square feet(2.27 acres) with general dimensions of about 500 feet (east to west) by about 210 feet (north to south); C. Together with an additional seven (7) buildings located to the west, north, and east of the project site,the subject buildings form part of a larger commercial/office complex. The complex is comprised of seven (7) parcels with a combined area of about 373,000 square feet(8.56 acres)and overall dimensions of about 850 feet (east to west) by about 370 feet (north to south); d. The zoning of the project site and the properties in all directions is Industrial Park (IP) District; e. The application contemplates the subdivision of the subject parcel into thirteen(13)units for condominium purposes; and f. The applicant only proposes the creation of individual units for condominium purposes on a fully developed commercial property and development of the site, i.e. grading, public improvements and/or construction of new buildings is not proposed. Item C-9 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-41 SUBTPM19481 —BONALDO ENGINEERING FOR PV RANCHO, LLC October 9, 2013 Page 2 • 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above,this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed subdivision is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The proposed project is to subdivide the property, specifically the office buildings, into thirteen(13)units for condominium purposes—no development of the site is proposed. The underlying General Plan designation is Industrial Park. b. The proposed subdivision, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety orwelfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The proposed project is to subdivide the property, specifically the office buildings, into thirteen (13) units for condominium purposes— no development of the site is proposed. C. The proposed subdivision complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. The proposed subdivision meets all standards outlined in the Development Code and the technical and development standards and policies of the Planning Commission and the City. 4. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines,the City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration on May 12, 2004 in connection with the City's approval of Development Review DRC2003-00988 and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16488. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project. No substantial changes are • proposed to the project that indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment; no substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicates new or more severe environmental impacts; no new important information shows the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered; and no additional mitigation measures are nowfeasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts. There have been no substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the projectwhich would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previous Negative Declaration. Staff further finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Negative Declaration, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less than significant. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) Approval is for the subdivision of a parcel of about 98,900 square feet (2.27 acres) that is currently developed with two (2) buildings with a combined floor area of about 26,700 square feet into thirteen (13) units for office condominium purposes in the Industrial Park(IP) District located at 10801 and 10803 Foothill Boulevard; APN: 0208-353-24. 2) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the • Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code,or any other City Ordinances. Item C-10 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-41 SUBTPM19481 — BONALDO ENGINEERING FOR PV RANCHO, LLC October 9, 2013 • Page 3 3) Prior to recordation of the Final Map, the applicant shall submit to the City applicable recorded documentation that establishes, and/or ensures the continuation of, agreements, easements, etc. for the purpose of mutual/reciprocal use, access, parking, and maintenance. Statements noting these agreements, easements, etc. shall be included on the Final Map. 4) Any proposals for development within the project site or the surrounding commercial/office complex shall require the review and approval of the City's Planning Department prior to construction and/or installation. 5) All Conditions of Approval for Development Review DRC2003-00988 and Tentative Parcel Map SUBPMT16488 shall apply. 6) All signs shall comply with Chapter 17.74(Sign Regulations for Private Property) of the Development Code and Uniform Sign Program #174. No additional ground or mounted signs shall be allowed by virtue of creating the condominium units. Engineering Department 1) The final parcel map shall be submitted for review and approval. Plan check fees will be required and determined at the time of submittal. • 2) Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&R's or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map. 3) Reciprocal parking agreements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all common roads, drives or parking areas shall be provided by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to or concurrent with the final parcel map. Fire Construction Services Maintenance and repair responsibilities of the water supply, fire sprinkler and fire alarm systems must be incorporated into the CC&R's of the owner's association.The system must be maintained in accordance with State and Local Laws. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2013. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Frances Howdyshell, Chairman • ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary Item C-11 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-41 SUBTPM19481 — BONALDO ENGINEERING FOR PV RANCHO, LLC October 9, 2013 Page 4 • I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 9th day of October 2013, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: • • Item C-12 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT#: SUBTPM19481 SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP APPLICANT: BONALDO ENGINEERING FOR PV RANCHO, LLC LOCATION: 10801 AND 10803 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD; APN: 0208-353-24 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR OMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: General Requirements Completion Date 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. 13-41 or Approval Letter, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 3. The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below. The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Manager hearing. a) Notice of Exemption -$50 • 1 Item C-13 Project No. SUBTPM19481 Completion Date B. Time Limits • 1. This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the Engineering Services Department within 3 years from the date of the approval. C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager. 3. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. D. SHOPPING CENTERS 1. Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours. 2. The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and in no event shall trash and debris remain for more than 24 hours. • • 2 Item C-14 R��H° Tentative Parcel Ma UCAMONGA �' `�°` �^ S U BT P M 19481 A request to subdivide a parcel of about 98,900 square feet (2.27 acres) that is currently developed with two (2) buildings with a combined floor area of about 26,700 square feet into thirteen ( 13) units for condominium purposes in the Industrial Park (IP) District located at 10801 and 10803 Foothill Boulevard ; APN : 0208-353-24. i RANCHO Project Background UCAMONGA tALIFORNUI • The project site is a set of two multi-tenant commercial/office buildings with a combined floor area of about 26,700 square feet located on a parcel of about 2.27 acres with general dimensions of about 500 feet (east to west) by about 210 feet (north to south); • They were approved by the Planning Commission on May 12, 2004 following the review of Development Review DRC2003-00988 and Tentative Parcel Map SUBPMT16488. i RANCHO Project Description UCAMONCA ALIFORNIA • The applicant, Bonaldo Engineering on behalf of PV Rancho, LLC, proposes to subdivide the subject parcel into thirteen ( 13) units for condominium purposes; • Following the subdivision , Building 1 will consist of eight (8) units while Building 2 will consist of five (5) units. ; • The applicant does not propose any physical changes to the site such as modifications to the parking lot, landscaping , or vehicular access/circulation , or any new construction . lr�'J.JSLWJ � _ ir dLX I \� �, . gra wJM►.._..• .�r.. r�..•.ytt �.. :s I � - p��lam " M r.w - ' •1 ' ` =.. , l i'! ;, j y N07ES• IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA EWITAA'6 an a PAAnro aLCNlavra NJ IN AT ME sc cux A¢ww RT.:wI6N Alc DEY. I Ise%9. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA z TW SDUTN ule a PMYFL 7 NW'o x esvSerwn As slow:DA PN.9=0/9]-9a P. TE(263C0'iLPD7 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 19481 P. W/M a L9AE35 oa9]NSE xmEn. q,7ye Radius Length Delta .P. W/TW 15 MW R PER PL9. C7 305.00 147.92 274716 -� C2 522.00 90.25 9'54 24 OF PARCEL I OF PARCEL NAP N0. I6 A.S SI60WN ON NAP RECORDED 96 6008 220 PACES 97 INROUDH 96 OF C3 294.00 93.35 16'1132 PARCEL NAPS RECORDS O SN4 9fRNAROW COMM C4 946.00 7663 43753 .9REE EdOR ms'INC. JULY,20L3 C5 967.00 1 265 OS 15'4215 C6 500.00 1 22.01 2.3116 FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES __ ITbti+'SYI RN J '13 E mffi�em x OWD___ W N OJAJ01'W PAD _ TR PYB ]20/9]-0 PARCEL 4 I:.:J - IT kk srif; Vis. I 1"'4ON"7o I I NNW VNi♦ UNIT UNIT 6 Ali W VYII R UNIT 3 UNIT] MIT I R Il N N - UNIi 8 `"f,•i�, .u�U' h ?pq a 0 Is Icy bn. "J r .gym, ow` e RU 'IR J54Y w . ...... ..... .., . . _. ,,. iL '•4F177"fa ' PER P.US,J30/9J-9e Q �' Don.u4m♦unnR ";^t LAUREL STREET rrar.nL�a tuna x esm'Se-E ° 4 JAww.w colt'.. Lb LS /GYEp1ED �1"LP. W/ Jett' m. won TIES av ux RN PER ®e®Y 'D'cnoSe — an>e sxuT am R srtE7 !113In�m 8 9UITEJ49 sm, 9E¢ l SUITE, s a a / FwI L6rl m 1.716 m 1.]16 m W,m Sm Ins1.619 m. 1,519 m 1.437 mR R R, C910eri :R/DEVELOPER: ]e�R' 9% uc 1ST fLOOR PLAN ra^r^^^.' .A'MLA m m/rlo se 0 m CA 931= Just rw IA69 ass. r.sN m .Irr rre 7671 -60 Jun tIs iAll us7. R L346 m LEG4L DESCRIPTION: SATE 1W AT`oW' R. 1'9�90-1� s°v7m IN IAV LL uu PMYAL 1 v 7xmxE v+P 7.n 16139 4s 7i 9MRf$K 9M)WM dI IW FCLYN6iD W NAM 1M PMIS Jurt rp Ms SF. � 61NJ12 RAvaw m`£ 5IE 1D3 a�Jlw��mnum xw9 rrtenros a Just rm :,6r9 ass. � / L69Q m 0 I 0 w. V. ------------ I im u 10801.FOOTHILL BLVD.__DEMISINO WALL PLAN U 10803 FOOTHILL BLVD.-SECOND FLOOR DEMISING WALL PLAN 12 ramnse� u m r y� ` liaf iCnLL iw �¢{ pOf LrniLiw ✓� �O CM NirxLL6W LtliI�lyLw. �(COGSd� tl9C1119.1IP8 10803 FOOTHILL BLVD.-FIRST FLOOR DEMISING WALL PLAN RANCHO Environmental Assessment UCAMONGA CALIFORNIA • Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQK) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration on May 12, 2004 in connection with the City's approval of Development Review DRC2003-00988 and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16488. 1 Environmental Assessment RANCHO (continued) UCAMONGA CALIFORNIA • Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 , no subsequent or supplemental environmental review is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project; • There have been no substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration . RANCHO Correspondence UCAMONCA CALIF©RMA • This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper; • The property was posted ; • Notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site; • No correspondence or comments have been received . OWNi RANCHO Staff Recommendation UC,AMONGA CALIFORNIA Staff Recommends Approval of: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19481 by adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with conditions. LJ SIGN-IN SHEET PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING RANCHO CUCAMONGA October 9, 2013 NAME COMPANY ADDRESS/EMAIL