The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2013-10-23 - Agenda Packet - HPC / PC • THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA THE REGULAR MEETINGS OF R 1NCHO CUCAMONGA THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 23, 2013 - 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER • Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call Chairman Howdyshell _ Vice Chairman Fletcher Munoz_ Wimberly_ Oaxaca II. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Historic Preservation Commission or Planning Commission, not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. • HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RANoHo OCTOBER 23, 2013 CUCAMONM Page 2 III. CONSENT CALENDAR/HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION A. Approval of minutes dated October 9, 2013 B. VACATION OF A PORTION OF CENTER AVENUE AND 24TH STREET, LOCATED AT 10312 24TH STREET, WEST OF HAVEN AVENUE AND SOUTH OF ARROW ROUTE (V-222) — JAZMIN BRISENO — A request to vacate a portion of Center Avenue and a portion of 24th Street, located at 10312 24th Street, west of Haven Avenue and south of Arrow Route -APN 209-122-01 Related File: DRC2012-00694 IV. DIRECTOR'S REPORTS/PLANNING COMMISSION C. WEST SIDE DISTRICTS AND STREET LIGHTING DISTRICTS • V. PUBLIC HEARINGS/PLANNING COMMISSION The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chairman will open the public hearing to receive testimony. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. Please sign in after speaking. D. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19433 - FOUNTAINHEAD DEVELOPMENT - A request to create two parcels from one existing parcel (APN 0227-151-38) located within an existing shopping center at the northwest corner of Rochester Avenue and Foothill Boulevard in the Community Commercial (CC) District of the Terra Vista Community Plan on property located at 11884 Foothill Boulevard. Related Files: Design Review DRC2013- 00458 and Conditional Use Permit Modification DRC2013-00459. This project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to state CEQA guidelines sections 15315 (Class 15 Exemption — Minor Land Divisions). E. DESIGN REVIEW DRC2013-00458 - FOUNTAINHEAD DEVELOPMENT - A request to develop a 4,994 square foot building within an existing shopping center at the northwest corner of Rochester Avenue and Foothill Boulevard in the Community Commercial (CC) District of the Terra Vista Community Plan on property located at 11884 Foothill Boulevard • -APN: 0227-151-38. Related Files: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19433 and Conditional Use Permit Modification DRC2013-00459. This project is categorically exempt from the • HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA W,cao OCTOBER 23, 2013 CMAMGNGA Page 3 requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to state CEQA guidelines section 15332 (Class 32 Exemption - In-Fill Development Projects). F. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT MODIFICATION DRC2013-00459 - FOUNTAINHEAD DEVELOPMENT - A request to amend Conditional Use Permit CUP95-11 to modify an existing master plan to allow for the construction of a 4,994 square foot building within an existing shopping center at the northwest corner of Rochester Avenue and Foothill Boulevard in the Community Commercial (CC) District of the Terra Vista Community Plan on property located at 11884 Foothill Boulevard - APN: 0227-151-38. Related Files: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19433 and Design Review DRC2013-00458. This project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to state CEQA guidelines sections 15332 (Class 32 Exemption - In-Fill Development Projects). G. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2012-01202 - LENNAR HOMES OF CALIFORNIA: A review of 291 single-family homes that will be constructed in conjunction with a proposed • subdivision of a parcel of about 3,047,614 square feet (79.67-acres) in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan (South Overlay), located about 525 feet east of Etiwanda Avenue at the north side of Arrow Route; APN: 0229-041-09. Related files: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18870 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00483. On July 10, 2013, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was adopted by the Planning Commission for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18870. Per Section 15162, no further environmental review is required for subsequent projects or minor revisions to projects within the scope of a previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19448 - MIG/HOGLE-IRELAND FOR GOODMAN RANCHO SPE, LLC - A review of a tentative parcel map in conjunction with a proposal to construct two (2) industrial warehouse buildings of 555,664 square feet (Building 1/Phase 1) and 1,033,565 square feet (Building 2/Phase 2) on a property comprised of three (3) parcels with a combined area of 3,255,834 square feet (74.7 acres) which is currently developed with a concrete pipe manufacturing/storage facility (operated by Ameron International) in the Heavy Industrial (HI) District located at the southwest corner of Arrow Route and Etiwanda Avenue; APNs: 0229-131-04, -17, and -25. Related files: Development Review DRC2013-00155, Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00315, and Uniform Sign Program DRC2013-00316. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. I. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00155 - MIG/HOGLE-IRELAND FOR GOODMAN RANCHO SPE, LLC -A review of a proposal to construct two (2) industrial warehouse buildings of 555,664 square feet (Building 1/Phase 1) and 1,033,565 square feet (Building 2/Phase 2) on a property comprised of three (3) • parcels with a combined area of 3,255,834 square feet (74.7 acres) which is currently developed with a concrete pipe manufacturing/storage facility (operated by Ameron International) in the Heavy Industrial (HI) District located at the southwest corner of Arrow HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA FANCHO OCTOBER 23, 2013 CUCAMONGA Page 4 Route and Etiwanda Avenue; APNs: 0229-131-04, -17, and -25. Related files: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19448, Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00315, and Uniform Sign Program DRC2013-00316. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. J. TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2013-00315 - MIG/HOGLE-IRELAND FOR GOODMAN RANCHO SPE, LLC- A request to remove trees in conjunction with a proposal to construct two (2) industrial warehouse buildings of 555,664 square feet (Building 1/Phase 1) and 1,033,565 square feet (Building 2/Phase 2) on a property comprised of three (3) parcels with a combined area of 3,255,834 square feet (74.7 acres) which is currently developed with a concrete pipe manufacturing/storage facility (operated by Ameron International) in the Heavy Industrial (HI) District located at the southwest corner of Arrow Route and Etiwanda Avenue; APNs: 0229-131-04, -17, and -25. Related files: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19448, Development Review DRC2013-00155, and Uniform Sign Program DRC2013-00316. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. K. UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM DRC2013-00316-MIG/HOGLE-IRELAND FOR GOODMAN • RANCHO SPE, LLC - A request to establish a Uniform Sign Program in conjunction with a proposal to construct two (2) industrial warehouse buildings of 555,664 square feet (Building 1/Phase 1) and 1,033,565 square feet (Building 2/Phase 2) on a property comprised of three (3) parcels with a combined area of 3,255,834 square feet (74.7 acres) which is currently developed with a concrete pipe manufacturing/storage facility (operated by Ameron International) in the Heavy Industrial (HI) District located at the southwest corner of Arrow Route and Etiwanda Avenue; APNs: 0229-131-04, -17, and -25. Related files: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19448, Development Review DRC2013-00155, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00315. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. L. DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2013-00817 AND ADDENDUM TO GENERAL PLAN FINAL PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (FPEIR) (SCH #2000061027)- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA-A supplement to Development Code Update (DRC2010-00571) amending Title 17 (Development Code) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to clarify definitions, administrative procedures and correct prior errors and omissions. An Addendum to the General Plan FPEIR has been prepared for this project. This item will be forwarded to the City Council for final action. M. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00530 — FH II — FRONTIER 12 — A request to construct 12 single family residences on 3.6 acres of land within the Low Residential (2-4 Dwelling Units per acre) in the Etiwanda North Specific Plan, located on the southwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Vintage Drive — APN: 0225-161-13. On March 13, 2013, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was adopted by the Planning Commission for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18709. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that • HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION - AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO OCTOBER 23, 2013 C`AMONGA Page 5 no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects or minor revisions to projects within the scope of a previous Negative Declaration. VI. COMMISSION CONCERNS/HISTORIC PRESERVATION AND PLANNING COMMISSION VII. ADJOURNMENT • 1, Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, ormy designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on October 17, 2013, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After speaking, please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium. It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. • If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under"Public Comments." There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO OCTOBER 23, 2013 CUCAMONGA Page 6 Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. A copy of any such materials should also be provided to the Secretary to be used for the official public record. All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. Requests for scheduling agenda items will be at the discretion of the Commission and the Planning Director. AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., except for legal City holidays. APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of$2,486 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas, staff reports and minutes can be found at www.CityofRC.us • Vicinity Map Historic Preservation and Planning Commission Meeting October 23 , 2013 m m E a X00F c 1 U O v C f Y CL 10 a x x F CL m � � I U i c � l m AD i 19 St i Base Line /Base t J /V Church Church t FoothillothIII N i � m o I Arnow E ° Arro c o m J rsey C 8th I F 0 cc $ I o W t9 th H = 6t w € Y M B 4th a x N 4th * Meeting Location: G City Hall/Council Chambers 10600 Civic Center Drive • Item A: Approval of Regular Meeting Minutes dated October 9, 2013 Item C: West Side Districts and Street Lighting Districts Item L: Development Code Amendments (Citywide) THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AANCHOP, THE MINUTES OF C1CAMONGA THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 9, 2013 - 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER Pledge of Allegiance 7.00 PM • Roll Call Chairman Howdyshell X Vice Chairman Fletcher X Munoz X Wimberly X Oaxaca X Additional Staff Present: Candyce Burnett, Planning Manager, Jeff Bloom, Deputy City ManagerlEconomic and Community Development; Steven Flower Assistant City Attorney,- Lois ttorney;Lois Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary; Mike Smith, Associate Planner II. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Historic Preservation Commission or Planning Commission, not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any activity which might None • Item A-1 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION • - AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES C OCTOBER 9, 2013 UCAMONGA Page 2 III. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND PRESENTATIONS None IV. CONSENT CALENDAR/HISTORIC PRESERVATION 11 COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION A. Approval of minutes dated September 25, 2013 Moved by Wimberly and seconded by Oaxaca, to adopt the Consent Calendar. Carried 5-0 V. DIRECTOR'S REPORTS/PLANNING COMMISSION B. ADOPTION OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION ADMINISTRATIVE GUIDELINES Lois Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary gave the report. • Moved by Munoz and seconded by Wimberly to adopt the Amended Guidelines. Carried 5-0. VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS/PLANNING COMMISSION The following items have been advertised and/orposted as public hearings as required by law. The Chairman will open the public hearing to receive testimony. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project Please sign in after speaking. C. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19481 — BONALDO ENGINEERING FOR PV RANCHO, LLC: A request to subdivide a parcel of about 98,900 square feet (2.27 acres) that is currently developed with two(2) buildings with a combined floor area of about 26,700 square feet into thirteen (13) units for condominium purposes in the Industrial Park (IP) District located at 10801 and 10803 Foothill Boulevard; APN: 0208-353-24. Related files: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16488 and Development Review DRC2003-00988. On May 12, 2004, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was adopted by the Planning Commission for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16488 and Development Review DRC2003-00988. Per Section 15162, no further environmental review is required for subsequent projects or minor revisions to projects within the scope of a previous Negative Declaration. Mike Smith, Associate Planner, presented the staff report and PowerPoint presentation (copy on file) • Item A-2 • HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OCTOBER 9, 2013 CUtZOMA Page 3 Vice Chairman Fletcher confirmed that this is a subdivision of existing buildings and no new development is occurring and no new parking needs will have to be addressed. Serge Bonaldo, Bonaldo Engineering appeared on behalf of the applicant and stated that he accepts all the conditions of approval. Chairman Howdyshell opened the public hearing and seeing and hearing no comment, closed the public hearing. Moved by Munoz, seconded by Wimberly to adopt Resolution 13-41 to adopt Tentative Parcel Map SUB TPM19481. Carried 5-0 VII: COMMISSION CONCERNWHISTORIC PRESERVATION AND PLANNING COMMISSION • None VIII. ADJOURNMENT 715 PM 1, Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on October 3, 2013, at least 72 hours poor to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. enE10If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting wall enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to -sure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak,given • Item A-3 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION • AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES CRAMHO OCTOBER 9, 2013 Page 4 the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others,the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After speaking, please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium. It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under"Public Comments." There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda. Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. A copy of any such materials should also be provided to the Secretary to be used for the official public record. All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. Requests for scheduling agenda items will be at the discretion of the Commission and the Planning Director. AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS • Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., except for legal City holidays. APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of$2,486 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas, staff reports and minutes can be found at www.CitvofRC.us • Item A-4 STAFF REPORT • ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Date: October 23, 2013 RANCHO To: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission CUCAMONGA From: Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer By: Carlo Cambare, Engineering Technician Subject: VACATION OF A PORTION OF CENTER AVENUE AND 24th STREET, LOCATED . AT 10312 24TH STREET, WEST OF HAVEN AVENUE AND SOUTH OF ARROW ROUTE (V-222) - JAZMIN BRISENO - A request to vacate a portion of Center Avenue and a portion of 24th Street, located at 10312 24th Street, west of Haven Avenue and south of Arrow Route - APN 209-122-01 Related File: DRC2012-00694 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission make the finding through minute action that the proposed Vacation is in conformance with the General Plan. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: In conjunction with the development review for a new single family residence at 10312 24th Street, it was determined that there is an excess right-of-way of 10 feet, located on • the east side of Center Avenue and the north side of 24th Street, west of Haven Avenue, south of Arrow Route. Said excess right-of-way was previously dedicated under the North Cucamonga Township Map. Once vacated, said excess right-of-way will be part of Lots 1, 2, 3, and 4 of Block 58 of the North Cucamonga Township. The Vacation is consistent with the General Plan and the Development Code because said excess right-of-way is not required for streets, highways and related purposes anymore and therefore will be part of Lots 1, 2, 3, and 4 of Block 58 of the North Cucamonga Township. Respectfully submitted, Dan Jam Senior Civil Engineer Attachments: Exhibit"A" -Vicinity Map DJ:CC/rlf • Item B-1 �_ ,. , a 120911!220 0911208 20910421 20910407 \/ m 20910322 3 20910428 /\ n m m 20911209 20910633 20910321 _� W m N 3 �' N No 4 20911210 y 20970418 2091043220910320 W A N J N NN N N 20910440 Q $ N J N N IJ N N N N A y Q G u Z, j 4N1 H .a N GJ s A A O m 20910441 A J N u s -t:Nrl-R AV CENTER A'•' N N N N N N N \ N N N N N N N O m u .o m goo rt N J J JJN NNJ wJl NrN r , J J NJ J r W pe W N N N N N N N O V N P O tl N + N u O V A V N f 20912328 20912309 '" 20912223 _ 20912126 20912224 20912325 20812310 20912222 20912125 20912324 20912311 20912227 20912208 20912124 o o c N 4 20812325 20972372 20912220 20912209 20912123 ;$ 20912322 20912313 20912219 20912210 20912122 jso a �•'- 20912321 20912314 - 20912218 20912211 20912721 y 1 ,f ^' 20912320 209123t5 r 2091221720912212 20912120 8 - ' 20912319 20912316 20912216 20912179 o 20912225 3 20912318 20812317 20912215 20912118 a n '� MARINE AV MAMNL Av P:I • ITEM C PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION • • Item C-1 4 � ani fl LA rim N • ^ � tA Z � ` i What is the Issue? • Local parks, greenery, trails and street lighting help maintain the safety and character of our neighborhoods, schools, parks, and commercial areas. • Unfortunately there are not sufficient funds to continue to maintain these ° . neighborhood benefits. What Areas are Impacted? i A� These issues �o affect much of �s -TIT WW WLtiN the City's F�a West Side O p I 3 3 & W Impacts to Local Parks • Hundreds of children and ■ Additional funding is needed to ensure families enjoy local that park bathrooms are clean, neighborhood parks. playgrounds are safe, park lighting is maintained , and other park facilities can continue to be enjoyed for years to come. £J- Ir M d 7 Y w Maintaining Community Trails • Our miles of trails are used for recreation away from speeding cars. • Whether used as equestrian trails or to provide our kids with safe paths to school , we need to ensure they are maintained for safety. Street Lighting and Safety Needs • Street lighting assists in keeping the City's neighborhood streets safe. • Additional funds are needed to: continue to: • Repair/replace damaged street lights • Maintain lighting to ensure safe, walkable neighborhoods and deter crime. • Street lights allow police officers and firefighters to easily locate a resident's _ i home in an emergency. Are there local business needs? • Maintaining the safety and • Businesses need to maintain a character of local welcoming, safe environment for neighborhoods and customers and employees, with: commercial districts is • Well-maintained street lighting critical to supporting and • Graffiti abatement in parks retaining local businesses. . Removing trash from medians • Upkeep of commercial corridor landscaping What can be done? • Property owner assessments for parks and street lighting have not changed since 1993 • They are no longer sufficient to address the needs. • We are seeking to: • Simplify and streamline our neighborhood-based parks and lighting districts • Provide greater equity and transparency Equity for Property Owners • S new neighborhood- based Parks and Lighting Districts are being MERRAI(;EPARKZONE 3 proposed . r7 , BERYL PARK ZONE • Each property owner A" HER—ND CHURCHPARK assessment will go ZONE BYE LM 1tl Bw Lme FO directly to support LIONS AND REDHILL PARK ZONE services in each . F � unique area only for BEAR if /Nw GULCH wa.w PARK OL ZONE - D TOWN GENTRY its specific needs. �s, AND BUSINESS `q GOLDEN ZONE 5 OAK ;SOUTH RANCHO PARK S BUSINESS ZONE ZONE .n Increased Transparency _ • This process ensures that each ' property owner: • Pays a fair rate I • Understands the services they are receiving for their assessment dollars • Allows owners to support the neighborhood parks and street lights that their homes and businesses directly benefit from Fiscal Accountability and Oversight • All revenues must be deposited into a separate fund. • By law, funds can only be spent to maintain or improve the local area's parks, trails, greenery, and street lighting. • Annual independent audits will be published for public review. v A Citizens' Oversight Committee will monitor expenditures and ensure all funds are spent as promised. How would additional funds maintain local parks and street lighting? • Removing graffiti from park buildings, — street lights and along trails • Maintaining parks, sports fields, playground equipment • Cleaning park restrooms • Fixing broken sprinklers in parks • Cleaning up trash n • Repairing and replacing burnt-out street lights • Keeping street lights on • Maintaining landscaping along busy thoroughfares What can you do to help? r. ✓ Fill out the feedback form now and hand it in . Tell us your priorities for parks and lighting in your neighborhood ✓ Do you belong to other organizations that need this information? SIJ Let us know. ✓ Sign up to stay informed and help in the future. M For • re information. . . Lands ?pAp 1 '• ? Vii,.Y� .� q�w '.T s ' •{ r 7r 1 - .AMR Feedback Survey on Parks and Lighting Needs ❑■ r�0■ Please take a moment to let us know your priorities for parks and street lighting in your neighborhood. Please check any priorities that apply: ❑� ❑ Removing graffiti from park buildings, street lights and along trails Scan to take the ❑ Maintaining parks, playground equipment & cleaning park restrooms survey online! ❑ Fixing broken sprinklers in parks and along trails ❑ Cleaning up trash ❑ Repairing and replacing damaged or burnt-out street lights ❑ Keeping street lights on ❑ Maintaining landscaping along busy thoroughfares ❑ Ensuring all property owners pay a fair rate ❑ Ensuring assessments go directly to my local area for its specific needs ❑ Other: ❑ I have the following questions: Select your closest neighborhood: ❑ Heritage Park ❑ Beryl Park ❑ Hermosa and Church Street Parks ❑ Lions Park and Red Hill ❑ Bear Gulch Park ❑ Old Town/Golden Oak Park ❑ South Rancho Business Zone ❑ Gentry Business Zone Contact Information: ❑ Yes, please keep me updated! Name: Organizational Affiliation (if any): Address: City/State/Zip: Phone (day): (eve) Email: Please return this form by fax or mail to: City of Rancho Cucamonga Dean Rdia, Paks &Landscape Mintenance Supeintendent 8794 Lion Street, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: (909)477-2730 ex.4137 Fax: 909-477-2731 City Council looks forward to getting feedback on this updated system to simplify and streamline community maintenance districts to provide greater equity and transparency and to effectively address the lack of funding for parks and street lighting needs. Q. How is fiscal accountability and oversight being addressed? A: All revenues from these local maintenance districts must be deposited into a separate fund that, by law, can only be spent to maintain or improve the local area's parks, trails, greenery, and street lighting. All funds must stay in Rancho Cucamonga and can't be taken by Sacramento. Annual independent audits will be published for public review, and a Citizens' Oversight Committee will monitor expenditures and ensure all funds are spent as promised. Q: How would additional funds maintain local parks and street lighting? A: Additional funds would continue to maintain and improve local parks and street lights by: • Removing graffiti from park buildings, street lights and along trails • Maintaining parks, playground equipment and cleaning park restrooms • Fixing broken sprinklers in parks and along trails • Cleaning up trash • Maintaining street lights for safety • Repairing and replacing damaged or burnt-out street lights • Keeping street lights on • Maintaining landscaping along busy thoroughfares Q: How can my neighborhood benefit specifically? A: Impacted neighborhoods have been organized into eight community areas that have similar parks and lighting needs. Key neighborhood needs include: => Heritage Park: Continuing to keep this beautiful park well-maintained and well-lit; ensuring recreation facilities like the equestrian center, ball fields, picnic shelters, and park playgrounds are well cared for; preserving neighborhood greenery and "open-space" way of life => Beryl Park: Keeping park sports fields, tennis courts, playgrounds, and restrooms clean and well- maintained; keeping trails well-maintained; and maintaining neighborhood green belts and lighting => Hermosa and Church Street Parks: Keep neighborhoods well-lit and safe; maintain neighborhood parks for sports and recreation programs; ensure commercial corridor greenery is well-maintained => Lions Park and Red Hill: Keeping roads on The Hill well-lit and safe; ensuring Red Hill Park's sports fields, facilities and beautiful landscaping is kept clean and well-maintained; maintaining Lions Park and its tennis courts; maintaining street lighting in neighborhoods for safety => Bear Gulch Park: Ensuring park and facilities are clean, graffiti free and well-maintained and that surrounding neighborhood streets are well-lit for safety => Old Town/Golden Oak Park: Ensuring parks remain clean, graffiti free and well-maintained neighborhood gathering spaces and that surrounding neighborhoods are well-lit for safety => South Rancho Business Zone: Maintaining essential street lighting for safety for apartment buildings, local businesses and industrial properties =:> Gentry Business Zone: Maintaining essential street lighting for safety of homeowners adjacent to industrial areas and to protect local business properties. Q: How can I find out more information? A: For information about these issues, please visit www.cityofrc.us/districts or contact Dean Rodia, Parks & Landscape Maintenance Superintendent at (909) 477-2730. Updated 1013113 Frequently Asked Questions about Neighborhood Parks and Street Lighting RANCHO Q: What is the issue? C,UCAMONGA A: Local parks, street lighting, greenery, trails help maintain the safety and character of our neighborhoods, schools, parks, and commercial areas —keeping them vibrant, beautiful and desirable places to live and do business. Unfortunately many of Rancho Cucamonga's community maintenance districts that support these neighborhood benefits no longer have sufficient funds to adequately maintain local street lighting, parks, and landscaping. Q: How are local parks and trails What areas of the City are affected? impacted? r� ' A: Rancho Cucamonga is a family-friendly community, with hundreds of childrenf and families enjoying local neighborhood XERITAGE PARK ZONE A parks. Additional funding is needed to ensure that park bathrooms are clean, RERYL ZONE playgrounds are safe,park lighting is - CHURCH PARKS maintained, and other park facilities can ZONE continue to be enjoyed for years to come. UONRARD Our miles of trails are used for recreation M=AW, N w away from speeding cars. Whether used -. ... as equestrian trails or to provide our kids PEARGULCH , with safe paths to school, we need to OUB IOAR GENTRY BUSS Y Y ' ensure the are maintained for safety. D EN 1 " SINE H PARK OARS.. SOUTX RANO ,.. RlISINES52bllE Q: What are neighborhood street lighting SONE safety needs? A: Street lighting assists in keeping the City's neighborhood streets safe. Additional funds are needed to continue to repair and replace damaged street lights and maintain them to ensure safe,walkable neighborhoods and deter crime. Well-lit neighborhood streets allow drivers to better see traffic signs, pedestrians and bicyclists at night—avoiding serious injuries. Properly maintained street lighting also helps police officers and firefighters easily locate a resident's home in an emergency. Q: Are there local business needs? A: Maintaining the safety and character of local neighborhoods and commercial districts is critical to supporting and retaining local businesses and encouraging new businesses to locate here. Our city supports a diverse business community with neighborhood-serving retail, corporate offices, and industrial facilities whose property assessments fund essential street lighting and commercial corridor landscaping to maintain a welcoming, safe environment for customers and employees. Q: What can be done? A: The assessments paid by property owners to maintain local parks, street lighting, trails, and greenery along neighborhood thoroughfares have not changed since 1993 and are no longer sufficient to address the needs. Additionally, we must ensure that unique neighborhood priorities are addressed and that each property owner is paying a fair rate, while clearly understanding the services they are receiving for their assessment dollars. The City will be gathering input from homeowners and local businesses on their priorities for parks and street lights in their area. We are developing a plan to ensure that every property owner assessment goes directly to support services only for their local area and its specific needs. The STAFF REPORT - PLANNING DEPARTMENT • RANCHO Date: October 23, 2013 C,,UCAMONGA To: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission From: Candyce Burnett, Planning Manager By: Dominick Perez, Planning Technician Subject: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19433 - FOUNTAINHEAD DEVELOPMENT - A request to create two parcels from one existing parcel (APN: 0227-151-38) located within an existing shopping center at the northwest corner of Rochester Avenue and Foothill Boulevard within the Community Commercial (CC) District of the Terra Vista Community Plan, on property located at 11884 Foothill Boulevard. Related files: Design Review DRC2013-00458 and Conditional Use Permit Modification DRC2013-00459. This action is categorically exempt per the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15315, minor land divisions. DESIGN REVIEW DRC2013-00458 - FOUNTAINHEAD DEVELOPMENT - A request to develop a 4,994 square foot building within an existing shopping center at the northwest comer of Rochester Avenue and Foothill Boulevard within the Community Commercial (CC) District of the Terra Vista Community Plan, on property located at 11884 Foothill Boulevard - APN: 0227-151-38. Related files: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19433 and Conditional Use Permit Modification DRC2013-00459. This project • is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to state CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 (CLASS 32 EXEMPTION - IN-FILL DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS). CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT MODIFICATION DRC2013-00459 - FOUNTAINHEAD DEVELOPMENT - A request to amend Conditional Use Permit CUP95-11 to modify an existing master plan to allow for the construction of a 4,994 square foot building within an existing shopping center at the northwest corner of Rochester Avenue and Foothill Boulevard within the Community Commercial (CC) District of the Terra Vista Community Plan, on property located at 11884 Foothill Boulevard - APN: 0227-151-38. Related files: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19433 and Design Review DRC2013-00458. This project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Sections 15332 (CLASS 32 EXEMPTION - IN-FILL DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS). RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Design Review DRC2013-00458, Conditional Use Permit Modification DRC2013-00459, and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19433 through the adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval with Conditions. • Items D-F 1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM19433, DRC2013-00458, AND DRC2013-00459 — FOUNTAINHEAD DEVELOPMENT October 23, 2013 Page 2 • PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Single-Family Residences — Low Medium (LM) Residential District within the Terra Vista Community Plan South - Commercial Retail Buildings — Community Commercial (CC) District within the Terra Vista Community Plan East - Retail Commercial Center and Single-Family Residences — Community Commercial (CC) District and Low Residential (L) District West - Vacant Land — Community Commercial (CC) District within the Terra Vista Community Plan B. General Plan Designations: Project Site - General Commercial North - Low Medium Residential South - General Commercial East - Community Commercial and Low Residential West - Mixed Use C. Site Characteristics: The project area is located on an 11.18-acre parcel within an existing shopping center within the Community Commercial (CC) District of the Terra Vista Community Plan at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue. The site is currently developed and contains a large retail building and parking lot occupied by Home Depot. The site is surrounded to the south by smaller parcels that make up the subject shopping center; to the west by a vacant dirt lot; to the east across Rochester Avenue by a • retail shopping center and single-family homes; and to the north, across Malaga Drive, by single-family homes. ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant, Fountainhead Development, proposes to subdivide an 11.18-acre parcel into two parcels creating a .47-acre parcel at the southwest corner of Home Depot's property. The .47-acre parcel is approximately 85 feet wide by 240 feet long. The remaining parcel, which Home Depot occupies, will be 10.71 acres in size. Section 17.36 (Table 17.36.030-1) of the Development Code states that parcels created within shopping centers are exempt from minimum lot area, lot width and lot depth requirements. Therefore, since the subdivision takes place within an existing shopping center, the proposed Tentative Parcel Map is in compliance with this requirement. Parcel No. Size Acres Parcel 1 0.47 Parcel 2 10.71 In addition to the two-lot subdivision of the subject property, the applicant proposes the removal of 66 parking spaces for the development of a 4,994 square foot tire center on the newly created .47-acre parcel. The Floor Plan indicates that the building will include an automotive servicing area that will accommodate a maximum of 8 vehicles, a tire storage room, as well as a sales, and waiting area. The dimensions of the building footprint will be • Items D-F 2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM19433, DRC2013-00458, AND DRC2013-00459— FOUNTAINHEAD DEVELOPMENT October 23, 2013 • Page 3 approximately 150 feet wide by 36 feet deep. The architecture of the building will generally match the established theme throughout the shopping center and will incorporate stucco coated walls, concrete S-tile roof on the tower at the south end of the building, EI Dorado stone veneer placed on the columns at various locations of the building, a wood decorative awning, clear anodized aluminum storefront, and metal roll up doors to provide access to the service bays. The building will have a maximum height of 28 feet. The proposal also includes the installation of a detached accessory structure that will be used to house the trash bins as well as used tire storage. The accessory structure will match the material, color, and style of the primary building. The parcel includes a total of 17 parking spaces that are located along the west and south perimeter of the site adjacent to the proposed building. A pedestrian walkway will be installed along the western perimeter of the property that will provide off-site pedestrian access to the facility. Section 17.56 of the Development Code requires that a minimum of 10 percent of the site be landscaped. The site will have a total of 4,195 square feet of landscaped area, which will cover approximately 20 percent of the site. This project involves the modification of previously approved Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 95-11. CUP 95-11 was approved by the Planning Commission on September 27, 1995, allowing for the development of a shopping center that now consists of various businesses including a fast food drive-thru restaurant, a sit-down restaurant, a gas station, a home improvement store, a tire store as well as other auto and commercial retail stores. Resolution No. 95-45, which was adopted with the approval of Conditional Use Permit CUP95-11, states that a modified Conditional Use Permit application shall be submitted for review and approval for any modifications to the conceptually approved master plan. Staff has included a copy of • the previously approved Master Site Plan for reference (Exhibit P). Since this proposal involves a modification to this master plan, the applicant is requesting approval of the entitlement under CUP Modification DRC2013-00459. B. Parking: Per Section 17.64 of the Development Code, parking is calculated for vehicle service uses at 2.5 spaces for every 1,000 square feet of building area. Therefore, a total of 13 parking spaces are required for this use. Since the project includes a total of 17 parking spaces, the site will contain sufficient parking. Furthermore, although the proposed development will require the removal of 66 parking spaces throughout the shopping center, 936 overall parking spaces will be provided, 174 of which are surplus parking stalls. C. Grading and Technical Review Committees: The Grading and Technical Review Committees met with the applicant on October 1, 2013, to discuss the preliminary conditions of approval on the project. There were no major issues presented to the applicant and the project received approval. D. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee met with the applicant on October 1, 2013, to discuss this project. Various aspects of the design of this project were discussed including site and architectural design. Staff presented a minor concern relating to a proposed canvas awning adjacent to the storefront entrance of the sales and waiting area. The initial submittal incorporated a red canvas awning at the main pedestrian entrance of the front elevation. However, all buildings within the shopping center incorporate a wood trellis and decorative column element along visible building elevations, which is prominent through the center. Staff expressed that this architectural element should be added to the building in • Items D-F 3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM19433, DRC2013-00458, AND DRC2013-00459— FOUNTAINHEAD DEVELOPMENT October 23, 2013 Page 4 place of the red canvas awning along the storefront. The Committee concurred with staff's • recommendations and added that additional elements should be added to the east (rear) building elevation. The applicant and Committee agreed on additional design features to the proposed building, such as diamond tile insets along the east (rear) building elevation, additional decorative cornice treatments at the south end of the building, and the attachment of vertical metal trellises to two recessed wall planes on the east side of the building. The applicant's architect has since revised the architectural elevations to reflect the Committee's enhancements. E. Environmental Assessment: The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19433 qualifies as a Class 15 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15315 (Minor Land Divisions) because the project consists of the division of commercial property into four or fewer parcels, it conforms with the General Plan and zoning, no variances or exceptions are required, and there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Design Review DRC2013-00458 and Conditional Use Permit Modification DRC2013-00459 qualify as Class 32 exemptions under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 (In-Fill Development Projects) as the projects are consistent with the applicable General Plan designation and all applicable General Plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations, the proposed development occurs within City limits on a project site of no more than 5 acres substantially surrounded by urban uses, the project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species, approval of the projects would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality, and the site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. • CORRESPONDENCE: These items were advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. Respectfully submitted, Candyc rnett Planning Manager CB:DP/ge Attachments: Exhibit A - Aerial Photo of Project Site Exhibit B - Site Utilization Map Exhibit C - Site Plan Exhibit D - Roof Plan/Floor Plan Exhibit E - Architectural Elevations Exhibit F - Building Section Exhibit G - Photometric Site Plan Exhibit H - Preliminary Landscape Plan Exhibit I - Tentative Parcel Map • Items D-F 4 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM19433, DRC2013-00458, AND DRC2013-00459— FOUNTAINHEAD DEVELOPMENT October 23, 2013 • Page 5 Exhibit J - Topography Exhibit Exhibit K - Conceptual Grading Exhibit Exhibit L - Cut/Fill Exhibit Exhibit M - Preliminary Demo Exhibit Exhibit N - WQMP Site Plan Exhibit O - Site Photos Exhibit P - Master Site Plan for previously approved CUP95-11 Draft Resolution of Approval for Design Review DRC2013-00458 Draft Resolution of Approval for Conditional Use Permit Modification DRC2013-00458 Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19433 • • Items D-F 5 -ov k I larl wt- 1, 3w� 2 44 Ile, Mti 14 1 1. QLI TIP i3i TORiA VITA Ta V TARAM® ' .' 7 '••�• _ ` 4PC-TV) I 1 i ` Y CD I TOIwA VITA I I I ..e�....: RAM® • mwYa..rry ' — T�-'-•--- , i PCL, 1 I:.. . ' 11 1 I I PSA, �Nown,:rry 1 S I I IA,e.v�oTA {.•' T6D.A VITA F 11 C�MUUNTV i 'rj 1 IPOTVI 1 i- _ t � pol; k1 1 F 600• :r 1, 1 i •.I •,r I �I�'� � E-fir rr��i� • �t : � 1�5 - PCL Y �i — .__ f L •I •. ,.�......,.d..o�.�. - Tw�v1.rA 'a i . ._ .. - Ra,®��u"�.n, _sg�, t tee) � Cu��owe , F _ PLAN• t ' F o F . ,!Par .. r t P.—W 3 Eil [�ED E�l 645 - — o ., o w � °� w � PCCTKL.C{A/VAIO 1-�-,„ �-_j ._.._.. T--�• ' <— -- � ------ -- - - - ---- - — - --- c .ou.TL.L P—I I�TIiYL PAPIC 1 , PpJt♦9.1 1 eaw 1 �: I P 1 ] , ! - ' wC1l.TY.I � s I.I 1 I IOOO) i . COI„k,OiC,1L I ac SITE UTILIZATION MAP — ` ---—--- .w. __ ,� �``---____--/ .1al.,SO.L PAiYCI�' '�- ' ;��;:.. •....' �_ ' SUM O�IIt C=i � - �FILE NUMBERS:SUBTPM79033,ORCY013-OOOSB,DRC2013-00059 I j �I al ---- IIIIIITiII ll7/7jajTrTM � ---— 1� Uf: - 11M 110MB DEPOT 130,400 S.F, hIII ---------------- _ 1 ! CD y E_ 00 TIRE 4- r6EE eHr oto 1 POPTf7 i e O a E R-AFiOED L®'�PLAN _J _ ! _ — _ — am sr.*v, 1 TTiTT1TT1TI1TT�jT11� YYY��411 �� TU I UKUM v n 00 219 � l UIIII�HN �At/Ry wa«.-wem IJ _ i- - � PAC[10RY '645, DCgW! _ 1 148 S.F w.�aean - -------------FOOTHILL- - - ---- BLVD.-------- y -- ---� OVERALL SITE PLAN �� •- ,� SD1.0 FILE NUMBERS:SUSTPM19433,DRC2013-00458,ORC2013-00459 s m _� 11 ! 1 i ---------------------------- ---------------------'---------- _ ® 1�� «w•rwmn Mc 1�'1�-gym' 4 t �.',��J, U Y 4 v . • oe:; In•1R�• n--E ac mWa.a. m'n 1 law,urtpe I . i CD TRELLIS PLAN R O O F P L A N y 5 Tl i M.1 M 1 — -- - ; lid i —— -- -- — -- --- P 1 ® +ur 1 1 1 5 i 0 4 � t sas R.n mmmn Yee R.n ; FLOOR/ROOF PI/111 M.1 • of ti , TRASH ENCL. PLAN �F L O O R P L A N Al FILE NUMBERS.SU8TI.1.33,DRC20130W58,DRC201300a59 rn rn o WEST, ELEVATION CD 3 BAN=119 I /I NORTH, ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION SCI PROJECT FOUNTAINHEAD DEVELOPMENT RAMONA TIRE / FIRESTONE NO. S C H U S S C LAR K Date 11-211.23 / AN ARCHITECTURAL CORPORATION 10/03113 1401 QUAIL STREET,SUITE 100 11884 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD 9474 Kearny� Villa Road.Suite 215 NEWPORT BEACH,CA 92960 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA 91730 SCHEME _ San Diego, California 92126-4597 Sheet (949)752-2313 4 a TEL(858)578-2950 FAX(858)578-6346 1 of 1 ARCHrtECTURE•PLANNING • 0 0 M KEYNOTES r 1 w 1 w K� w 0..e,.ma.vrraca�c I I i..anc 1 1 I �,------ ; ; � ❑r ovn.sa�mu+w ors mmlammnnw vlr—T ❑j �sNawr®r<earMn.mra+im � Y� rn®sneuarwml..wto� I 8 ! aA` 1 I 1 - •o 1 I I O I sys ; ' lu•�.r ❑mnucw MolwmalMcv ! Il .Ni ' i i i umoa ❑+ ...-na.a+r.ora � r'�1f,e�SY I i 1 1 u I I , 0 asum.ms¢m+n � 1 Nj I I I t I 1 i t 1 1 1 � �meuwlulr�Wo� -- I I I 1 1 I 1 I l e • m- E I 1 I I I 1 I I I I i i r t ! co ► 3 BUILDING SECTION-F----114 BUILDING SECTION �� - 6 "Tl � 1 Fpoll i i I 1 � 1 1 ' ' I 1.7.71 . ..�.. '1'- 1 I BUIDNG �s , SECTIONS 1 � ! 1 1 f 1 r 1 1 1 F __ — ®IgllYroaaMsenPvonaos ---- J to K . •p4 w I A4.1 BUILDING SECTION v t A-0 SLUall J1181HX3i 4,......... . . .. . . a P. 1-4 ..... ..... I. r------- ------- ----------- -------- w .4 —----- ---- ....... . . I ------------ Z ---------- ---------- ----------- ........ 1 0 ?s z o T m CD ml o U) w 4-y CD . .......... ------------ -------- . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. .... ................................... . . . . . . . . . .. e � - w .'�u' b o� u_:_W;.�. d¢" E-4 •`Y•. a d_V"�d,, • N ... ... ........ .................................... . ..................... (13 ju, ----V7-1-79 SOUTHWEST Ff T GROUP UM) v Ll m till A -4J ———— -——JJ rain Wr. n-V FIRESTONE TIRE CENTER u U: 4,978 SP. ..:.: I I v E TYPE VB SPRINKLERED,1 STORY.$1/8 A TO lN0.Oe J6 T A., AA TO 'X FrA, .-N! --.rue—TO _7 10 Q- 4� PLANTING LEGEND PLANTING NOTE5 gel; AXtM92L MQ1AHr.&_NAM in om =Mwa UK= � M TOMA �R=TM W W�� OU� CTS A;:A D5GAFE CALCULATION5 TOTAL nage TOTALLAT ar;�ftLM AA LAN TREF . —=::,___ALL 1_.. 0 —MAM L- 1. -TALLAT= TOTAL —A. __AA ALL owc mreo—T WT.—1 ea—TAL— ruxwT9= A I u I..' LN you eee.MOOT L— .1.1-LAT.. ALA A .1 TO AT— 645 TIT A=11Z=IL A-—L AS =1=A-_-_—TO =-A .1 ]roc rco TO PREUMHARY LANDSCAM T:!l TIL _A TO eN .Nd]TN17-- =r-.10w rO.0' PLM —AT— 1A1. —.1. TO Li rn TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 19433 RAMONA TIRE/FIRESTONE L_ — — _ ROCHESTER AVENUE zw � I wrto zd[nrmz«Jsrx's i �tl• c�i z 5" "o �N" OLDso.pgJp r.crd. I I I w Z>-u I £ I caaaxwz/xcra I I I "w z E i4 eoommt x]a.a— I I oo F I II �I 4 It ff PARMpAlhfi.I ISI v3 ELL Y :I l I E.0 I ap a. ..; " RI vAnccc r �S xromao[I .a"^0v s L-3.xY 1.03, p.]r TBVTATNE PARCEL BASIS OF BEARING I ASAP Z.—a.:m.,..a.M.Suri�c..•�me,�rlr'c rox.n' v..• UNDERGROUND SERV/CEALER T Artr[ss, ENGINEER OF WORK BENCHMARK °"s n • -—A MC�aMYS�ttC]'.pdS Cd MKS�KrK Mr Y.S COa5r u.0 YtvwT lO Cit'a va Kv.l4 rtw OO.yryT NT � Kr ]b rtC>[.SI d rM11) S[ If.COv5(>rvcC.uCFT rOu • ' �rt"Ycnwµwss�ar at w�u4 vcnCr p.0 d—1r,urw 6.SN pD_tuC�JJ r+v I)1 w�+w O.vS Brmvr a4 NE -=50 : /'/'� Sd�MO: I.aRNYr(e5G 5[u"YD V exJ rHx"eOSt' '1=2-41. yC_I_ O.pr.x.wxba R[T xsnes[p Ir"[pro Igrq pYpeCT 50 Ca rHx O 10 ID b e0 nwet5 fir. drC rn TOPOGRAPHY EXHIBIT HOME DEPOT NOTES , µrwr+,rrtx vac,ra.,,r,Ar�wr arbr�arr RAM O NA TIRE/FIRESTONE e`� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA �nr UA,(wr vutc2 evr w Mr MY[prPor '� V,e[F',Sti�ralOW'nr Mo.(aPor 9R�FR,C,a,v /CrtN[x¢rpe GxK wre .. W N w I I I'• I I ' { j I II OLD SPAONI EAcroR NODE OEPO CENTER I' I -1. COMMERCIAL/RETAIL {, PARKING AREA COMMERC4IL/RETNL JP, /i ,a • � I ; I � , 1 i I- I I _ ! I '�I I p � ,_I i F a �v�o v I I ;FI_EL CD I R+vRA 1 �• ! Isar\ R f. DISCOUNT TRE COMMERCIAL/RETAIL v>Iar L I r roe p R l�y ISa 1 __ .e c `o rr.serv=e. J ` rr Kaw I 7"XA 57REET zcION or 645 FOO7ML B[W w srxr Ra°O BMW UNDERGROUND SERMEALERr ® smmn au staMe�ce0ra-cmerCx,,u4[)v�.,[TMVKA�1GS1Sra,n'rw!5w[ecuK[�[varanwts Re[rWrMar<e ENC/NEER OF WORK sarsaxsA u ,U o.�vsr ,,• `{/ rnADDRESS&APN- CONCEPTUAL GRADING EXHIBIT LEGEND EXISTING I E��°° i RAM 0 N A T I RE/F I R E S T O N E EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS 2 w„�a,G,�,G..r1� � s� ! .9e•.Slr-r DE RANCHO CU AMONGA LEGAL DESCRIPTION: rnia..�r._----------------- • nm9cramw__ _s-_-, °wm a=.wcn.,w no,.011«nK nn a no n.onc..mx rr KEY NOTES' KEY NOTES CONT' KEY NOTES CONT. sr.R Or G4.pae„S v[.a.i HCP.ae«Hoot,m O• 1 s.wosED .nr 7;Ya[....nro.YOG C,Rat MXv,«MwrrtNAPv uK..nr.., .BOK 21. .wrw ai .uv[ L.111n4 NI —_ ___ _+ .wLn..ux w.as r.n«aecn I:.nuvK.wrcaos a suo ttwrv.,.o.s .'n.a wrc n.u+osc..r �: rwcvoso K c vKrr ca rw anm erw rr0.o�N+IVFCnM x[[MRD R8«u/r W. 99i. /«94D A.6.rL,W rMtCAM ro E[rs'aca tw.w�srr ata .awL sno.,w a..s anp4 vECOmS vNtsVYD CrMfrLlC n¢t.Poi t0'r.a,..IO.'au(Rw. Si[EI[-x arJR.n.mubur _ [+RPI N.L Ol.ut.s(R.ti n,i«orulBSr.M xwO.rD IJ [nsnw aF[ro n( amD1FCr«a,tC ��v,�per.a I _ SG95r TT t rw4'MO..avm(Y!W rttr.nUr.MNr ME MG.r O• 1 K.IP,X.[M10XF(nM rA(t!/x.nOK(rrtnAKC 92LD rPP i, vASY,Sm.[C[SS w..r.i,T.,.rrr n.W w,l SLM, f«IRr.��,niED ro.ESILnn S,wRv Cp9a Bra[D wrC09ae he i0 G r.ovWSrCM M,«.a a9ECr4r -� sm rn scot,n:.wur,IO2 ah,.t wLco9ex nr. „ <wa.osm wruxs..0 aw CONCEPTUAL GR40/NG NOTES' [sm.,a Enttosra[.rn mrtt/s.mK ra cnosuK \.ssa n w�wm 1: i« wwo=asro oK�mo.ta.e.nxv nn9annc..n..r<awrcn ro rtx nwn..cr mattsrs ro..OK trss nun m crac..wz a ru a, -[xOtUXK GSr«[xn CpP veru wOPESS w,nx«e.UiUlr t«Ls u.O s wvwOPoSrD CRTAE4.rnY««rnovr a rw.5n fM105W[nowt x J'SIX.4x,,.grCwp..« dll«D.aa..e srlw.I.0 nOr nL wraw[0 Y.R 1.r£nY r„) t..N E.CUi45.rT t,MSGG«e,!Yr/Morin«a..¢.�wrG.wa.t L,sLKnr 6"n.Gw v.e?'."[B.M N e.,ws,r,!'0.C.mnr..rS .,R.Yww¢ • � z j tj oarw.rr0«,atrrurr.V�,n:D r[�,r n.r99n .fGMOED.,,.9ipr w. �6. ..MoSro 20'9,yts t«USC,K a«.rm.M,.0'Cu.n atM.c I. �S Nulu.OSc,v[�.5 u,[c4lED Ni W M _ __ _ 1 ,9�.6 «SiMd£Ni� 00l,rp0� uo..(.or0 er s K.0.[elae.t mwYom[w w Ca.Mf>[vo up,1x!'O[rn t'®X[ srE rtr woi[Il. M,«MCT p f"f5 to CO 2 r9.r iiia«SMw(N�no � x25,.9 r J4 1W�S M Vtnrw 2, r+.vn'1p.i ro RLY... �� 1 ,tt,KrlvM/rr,[xYSS M'ouPCKnn n,K!rM uri.wp•wr .Sn.,rr v��wiG ? wa Im,ms.x2, wwmosm is orr+wG«aae.m M,...a na.ro t«ov.n vw+«a n.s aw9rvrvu rn,r..9 a.w 1 � r�c>:z z os u n [x r«E nrpru,r ro w[.u«arorzcr«a.tz. •w[•.wwosn[ixrus"orEn c999tr.r unto. ,MY,K+nr. � Z W �o�. OWNER INFORMATION.' • . a,,,,,,,,r.,w,s..0 avaosro,-wa cavcnL¢.ux ers..9 Lx.a.rn ecwrm,nm'"rE•.n9 Mm.er ar s.a[vro.+M srtrr ur2sun a,.n 04343 r.09C 9rv0i 0.5...2'. r9M0YD CU.B w.va. 3 .ao M.«9fw,�i w[WOFo eE[WY n.o,(Gi Rt asnMe [Yv.[wr+I v.IwG' � �V s d�Cq Jm0 K5L!MMrw,K. ,0 ,.laM M[vTTLCr vR Ii9v CM.aCRM 6 M r[.C..'.M r55 ,- .taut r X4n.r Y4 �� Z z()^g M.,K.[. ,91an n6l.Q xmw.0 a�aC.Klar tw.IS Y Y4. Mi.rEer. 10. MiPW49 pP,«,Q 9K.MNr,.S.r U W Z t In./..o-,.,s 1,. a000•oYn awrssro uwX.,r.uc..n,sura,mar .�ornr«nu„.w[. a rc o m o „ vai6C9 m curd ais+.o sLn..e.rm �.,�p us 5 t RSr a.ni[w aMe. OLD SPAGHETTI FACTORY - ' '•—` � _ I � I v< COMMERCIAL/.RUA0. I I HOME DEPOT CENTER PARKING AREA I 7 I I I s yKr r PJ. COMMERCIAL/RETAIL I a I J m. /. 1 r-F I .. I .. j� . �..-� _ •. � I� I �I ��.N r.n,xi � W I . rvosn wiww usewn " yss" _ .00aor agile I�I fi'c-«m is 0 "TI I uta n n2is n x00atnoT 120.0!' .AL>f n Rom 10. — PJ i rzI, I $ t->< ;"►.� R :\ F W ;Tl namLai oil IRE �4.I .scorn �77tlAtc \A �./r I I 1 �qa� -p@ 2� ;mA n A ^�. ' _ e•;�. - DISCOUNT TIRE j I ! CEJ pppg COMIIERCML/RETAIL ` i i qg as is IF. v xn L 4`a g } i .... ... e -.. ...� .. .�. tut• J V / Lo N SITE 8 1 SCAIf: t'-20' icor BAS HOME DEPOT NOTES: EARTHWORK OUANTIT/ES' 10 m u w I� w9�Gr Nr: .,Gr. I�DIM I� Ov-C9nlauCnox utiM1.e.i•.dtixe 5n4l�atE a.C[ ht: "3 9rFN n(CYMne.erov M.tG. uaMr/Fapvr O 5 W :. r.a Nmor a a[G.wK ar v nc r,ar aw na G.r. .1. IAP EQ1,V11 ) -..� Sw[CrIC�rKW n[r[wrnrL EM[,nK aR On.k ,�f := < UNDERGROUNOSERV/CEALERT r9s, ENGINEER OF WORK 9.urs 3 PREPARED Sr' ® tarrnw+ryovsY¢ I� C9rlCC Ynlnl r52-IJ➢J `r-}pyYl-.,L r.o/S/,mv«G o.r5 MbT ra aG .. .. .. .' .fn•tac .e.r . �S�nrquf.RE AGC.3rit2 O,r[ C4 m CUT/FILL SECTION EXHIBIT L GEND �.w. X RAMONA TIRE/FIRESTONE T RANCHO CUCAMONGA , >s E - Z i 5 .. a DETAIL t •,xos •�•• Q5'Y41m • i1' � C4KFF,F B.,Y ��77 U'O B/ORETENTION AREAS NTS y K( . —. .f•1 Ey ls�� "-�\ ,c3CK R.w �OKslow 9Pe[TMnpI UG rn \ 5' ' r { L r _ - � I }o•e or[WK 0}.waNi snaMl B,Y S SECTION E— H Ma T/- tltltlYYY � p rt,a m,wmr 61ORETENTION AREAS $a e, .ss er .N.arc ,n sues NTs # 6_ No oam Noo.,c a Nola '� awel w,_rw u..c im\ sxem. ,roam m�enntwQa.urcr euro oa \i\\ (\\.\/ 4+ ��\�\�\\/\\��\\(�\ \/.�i•/� � a,.r waar avnv aro,ecu .c mK ,row m.rrw.w roost .u, �i SECTTOIVA SECTIONS '---- -"----""' K�rom DETAIL 'D• 645 e e G4TCH BA5/N CONNECTION NTS CUrlr-L. oonc°weM` «+a^o°wm as e^ w nrN UNDERGROUND SERV/CEALERT ,emcss,� ENGINEER OF WORK � SECTION C SSECT'OND ,,.,sr.""�,naw.oYwwr."`"'"""„` �v'n• "` Ko-,}}-.,L I}I�o„',w'o,rs enm[r[Y:(FG SCILE: '•20 � „2` mows v.nrt�NAc[ [L vtsl Y2 rte m,[Siwww . N C_5 X Z' HOME DEPOT NOTES PRELIMINARY DEMOLITION EXHIBITAl A3 I µ:��[r��[�r•°�� a�rr RAMONA TIRE/FIRESTONE �� At[iwt S,WI [RA[[W9?a plf[Ylv5nv10.-rpv CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - .xi[.irsc'rr ro cvK wrs I I I I E a HOME DEPOT CENTER ! I LOMMERCIAL/RETaI t, PARKING AREA I / i I ! V z N' COMMERCIAL/RETAI V o-a•__ I I ; a=n�a um / I�' IIi ! II �I c�zcs r-6 II jI I N PARCEL 2 o �["M.." ro'. / e•" ! ' -. a"..,.a%/ /// /. -v� A � .. '.�„f � a` •C swa.osm Amr["rr ,snw r mows i 1 'A CD 3 in U , N W� L laxro�curosuw[ PARCEL 1 WI - s+w:ur<ue M D15CWNT nRE COMMERCIAL/RETAIL _ I I I 16 IgSC Jigi .a. .[sroK a.cur 6 DEMOL177ON NOTES I”, I . i ` wmwrrw .1 ..� 1 "_I ` s. [��.m ar,urr..srw[m num m sr..r a• .. ..-- 1 s s sa,n[,w rac.¢ca«rcrwe e[rwoss..c un,rrs s",rn ro•. carom uAxc�wraro.m.. A. a[uaK A——n•K" 1-1 ro rasnw n.um.erre ro mw 645 .a r DEMO j EXHIBIT ——--——— UNDERGROUND SERWCEALERT ass, ENGINEER Of WORK A,[nr a[Anr+rpv A�A4>,er�AIRd?� a•e+M SCALE: '�r0 - "^n" __�K[- —-- V � MA,SOr c•((UAaaGMAAm SAw[•tp1 tat M[[s rrta -ROPY[-aJS np!%IbRAxt w rs BC/uPr rov PG 0 ,0 10 q b Jn war O AOOs[SS Ylr" [I.raF C-7 I 6waS M/I2Wuat]f t4r SSRI d? � 7 x WOMP SiTE PLAN i eEsrMANacrvrEacncEs ' III. RAM 0 NA TIRE/FIRESTONE SOURCE CONTROL GYPS TREATMENT CONTROL BMPS Cil Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HOME DEPOT ® ei LRETAIL TCEWER fE .. ba -�s' _ '�^2 _ K a- 2F."NII-en`�°e o m t!C� Olglr Ill��i WI IGLJVLG IgIM IIL[\� ......_ ... qty aw. � a BNP INSPECTIONANNUAL LOCATION ACTIVITYDETAIL E ,1 I.xosc.ir xRelT1R .�_ , _" FREQUENCY COST so.lan.."s BIORETENT/ON AREAS wmw"s 1 o dr" 1 ` I r JD/SD r4 b"xrux<, SIM nnwl[ Ast..IYAMR ARrOS i/O r0[S fa MS .. - � � ' .. -G:'`�' :• v-arxnrD r�roea.xo n'x-x xawxrz cRawn wKwxtC"r'R Rxx �a �ra)Ox.0 '+, -, ,_,_ j arRsalr � 4.anac Kx[M R[R.wi urr rao:<o.wcxs __ .... ��'! 'S1;It.Q / F.�S;1. ;..+'fir' `4:✓'•. 4Fi.R0 TY'!i x xLWK w,OGD 41 by"YD KRi"Mw /wDxDD[ Ee 1�'KtLS FADMK Y4Y0[tt[5 6 . ••J� �. 5 AC USO+ID-rO!OR xplC xiRRxRr¢ IwrRSLIK .i`• � ..__..... M0.Ou1rO'[xnbm Rtw(.WOOrb(. S1 •S r 1... e-xv"rssa ro HrcR ' ... ..,t � ,I 1 -r}, pN "nDL( ir9'rrrla OKR-ROUDOr[iExtS m[sx rDR wiwxr[:Y. 1 rDCIN[P u1O N�M'M 4Datxi MAl bL roCOKZxM"r[D S I i.'� O 4 - ..., I .ilial i r[O[ ROUrIOa wwCWrz[,CpR[Cr , rITS)'Sr• SYS Kx4wSbi Cbrb45 a[ID[0.VpM'ro T.. .. _ Stt C"SOLI I I .. S ,- ) ]1 1_ ! rz rzxwa foc1OD[:ro x RM CRS R llArtb"gtO. pao T I [ nn .xrx st.was"w Ras r4♦.o<b..a bvo-[x r Rov. w. rrs '1 .. 11TD'S]• GgwO[OKR..cY,v0 R.w KUM MrD x"Ip-4.. y wa, NEW ^� 1 BUILDING PL i ID.i[ w RESPONSIBILITY FOR MAINTENANCE: s k $ Du ruw[D O Kiv[x� SECTION £—£'SCK AT/C a r IwDxor . �a TIO BIORETEN N AREAS o aslavxn,ro wrai(wr,rzKU Ws 6�� 1 r FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR MAINTENANCE: E� ramssmir srarr+wxr xD D[.RRD' '� -1_.A.L1 sn°°rs}w.rrsraarru ... I ': I D I } (rurlwr T huKrr R[WOSRun ro M4TRn iDtf.) Kw aaO[ At.- ID -® b4'Srtxrra O ib0r[na Dvxx mD>u . Col ,. ........... xRE" Es__, , �er� ---- WOW BW AS-BUST QggBgrA7 : }� - r KR[B,<1wK,Dur D4 K[tiSSM,wi r[R waUM1 x.x"Lrtxf Rw B[ST � ... .:1 i: xxx.¢rxr nR.en¢4rxers xiK arx msnncrm uaxw xc Svrwn9a x.R"R( �� [ 1s-pb [ma.u[. .... wa ORaD[D'A4K2 K u naKRr- I NRD rIWCN'M1 I _- - ._._ —_— i._ DETAIL 19. CATCH BASIN CONNECAON t. Is x s ENG/NEER OF WORK ..� ._..._ - _ , ) \ 8" � .'c4Dwt xr.r[aa i - _- o w m ro m vxn. '•• 1 js SCYE: t'-}Q innx r I nmRRv 4D) WQMP I .-_ .f,, l..... i ruin. SITE PLAN +:ipA r ,� y • #3 . t,I #2 a y �: •s �� i.�,7-<' :tri; -ct t �:� •sem � �� —:t � ��i (, f <t��-;yam u ^.n � t '{�/4/{� 1 C �� f��q.��5 Y .r'. J� � ".tw'.� d 3 P "5�5 ��.�,. t•i r- �Str ��di1 E Via: it r JTv. ,�.. d.t.� ax v�.g; ( E '� n ts�3 i� 1;��i �, . .� ,�c Ic }./.i;.l} � v r . ,�... i r •ry y'n�r � Y�fi � Sy T'' �1. � .e�j 5 i �f e" r �.t y '� r � � r }. fit! ±+1 ti, i 4, ..,.1 tit y. 7 ;¢ti. v � �'� 1'! Y i+. Fi< � !:. .,..� 5 � . 1 � �+ r. J b j �j}{lo" ,1�,.�r`7'��i-!j..+}'i�' C'iM j i Z,n:i P i '�^ .y;.. .. � a.�,!. � � b �� ¢ q ux 1 i.. .e �dt�. E"� ix•:� {- 5� • r:�'-sq"^:iul�'f Kr Cfx.;4 �",� _ ��. . � � s�as.c .K��Y'i�� p v1.�t� '�.�Y.. �, �y �j�F k(�tMM 4' � 1`Y - � a � :� � x i J iaJ .1,..,� -r _ r 4ex ..,,,�yy k>,.Y 1 rfr+Y m.l� t5'alt�` � �l�.J' 9�ntl`Y.5 1(F.J �'Y5.Y1 � :uh r.... { v t'� 4 `1 J '� y s x5ri , � ' � �, "�' Al �I. ; Jam- 4 M 1.n� ✓A cif .I y YFi > .Lllo � •. ?!: }` ray*,F.Y,? fi..,�!• E-�'Qr is t1. 't" » r�sMA'..Y.�x�7-:jr:� LIP j� 1,..'. MA pmw �' -:.x""��r•—+a" a r yf .. Lr�.:.c,ww" ^n. '� �� TJ �iN' �r.>:. n w a , A r L r �f �� .+c ♦ Y Y 'I f G� fid-": ST �• ajf w j. { Y v �kf "5�i+r- ,vf x Y rr 4 Y 5 N•' ' ' r+ � •'@j (� � St4t \t } `�� f� "�. 113 . r v x, { ! rp t z�?C`+�,�.5,��+^+�' r L.a, '(�4 en r,,, � �ky,�.r-.7,.,�� is• "n' ,rct!,�,.w�e,`�. yf�..h ',i f t^ A i.¢.'4 •('s. l �'X •Y ((+v Rf _Y .0>lt;si �� C,✓_. Y.; j" w.. -q-,ate.-r., s^. _ �..ice""•" ,. � Cit ��! ' ; • _• I • m R DRIVE XYOMAYMII•IUl' nrmTI'l lmTrImm U or.. it - --� THE HOME DEPOT GAR [N 103,000 sl s CEN FR s� n .ur J i I H UIM Z - W1 Ud U nn j O PHASE ONE / ) SfTE PLAN --------- --------- - - -! L TWA VISTA PROMENADE Goon `- FOO-TRILL —BOULEVARD _ EEou SIC" IIGHI $KNAL ULHT AROIUIFTA • CH LET s 9 gZ J-p swa}I C � TN AR D Lt i ::L%1 ► E I I L Eg _y _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ B O - NES- E N _ A V E N CLT__ f g p I S I 6F � e d888Etd � f g � � i � � � •�if : SitiSii, !i RESOLUTION NO. 13-44 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA,APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 19433, A REQUEST TO CREATE TWO PARCELS FROM ONE EXISTING PARCEL (APN 0227-151-38) LOCATED WITHIN AN EXISTING SHOPPING CENTER AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF ROCHESTER AVENUE AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD WITHIN THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL(CC)DISTRICT OF THE TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN, ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 11884 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF-APN: 0227-151-38. A. Recitals. 1. Fountainhead Development filed an application for the approval of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19433, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 23rd day of October 2013, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning • Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on October 23, 2013, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The project area is located on an 11.18-acre parcel located at 11884 Foothill Boulevard within an existing shopping center within the Community Commercial(CC) District of the Terra Vista Community Plan at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue; and b. The property to the north of the subject site contains single-family residences and is within the Low Medium (LM) Residential District within the Terra Vista Community Plan;the property to the south consists of commercial retail buildings and is within the Community Commercial (CC) District within the Terra Vista Community Plan;the property to the east contains a retail commercial center within the Community Commercial(CC) District as well as single-family residences within the Low Residential (L) District; and the property to the west is vacant land within the Community Commercial (CC) District; and C. The project proposes the subdivision of one existing 11.18-acre parcel into two parcels consisting of a .47-acre parcel and a 10.71-acre parcel; and • Items D-F 29 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-44 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19433—FOUNTAINHEAD DEVELOPMENT October 23, 2013 Page 2 d. Section 17.36 (Table 17.36.030-1) of the Development Code states that parcels • created within shopping centers are exempt from minimum lot area, lot width, and lot depth requirements. Therefore, since the subdivision takes place within an existing shopping center,the proposed Tentative Parcel Map is in compliance with this requirement; and e. The proposed subdivision is in connection with the proposed development of a 4,994 square foot building on the newly created .47-acre parcel. The development will provide sufficient parking and landscaping per the requirements indicated in the Development Code. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the tentative parcel map is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and Terra Vista Community Plan,which allow for the subdivision of land in conjunction with proposed development; and b. The design or improvements of the subdivision is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and Terra Vista Community Plan. Section 17.36 (Table 17.36.030-1) of the Development Code states that parcels created within shopping centers are exempt from minimum lot area, lot width, and lot depth requirements. Therefore, since the subdivision takes place within an existing shopping center, the proposed tentative parcel map is in compliance with this requirement; and C. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed. The proposed • subdivision is in connection with the proposed development of a 4,994 square foot building on the subject .47-acre parcel. The development will provide sufficient parking and landscaping, per the requirements indicated in the Development Code; and d. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage, avoidable injuryto humans and wildlife or their habitat,and serious public health problems. The existing site has already been developed in accordance with a previously approved project. Furthermore, this subdivision along with the proposed development is consistent with the establish surrounding development; and e. The design of the tentative parcel map will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record,for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 4. The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies under the Class 15 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15315 (Minor Land Divisions) because the project consists of the division of commercial property into four or fewer parcels, it conforms with the General Plan and zoning, no variances or exceptions are required. In addition, there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staffs determination of exemption. • Items D-F 30 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-44 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19433— FOUNTAINHEAD DEVELOPMENT October 23, 2013 Page 3 • 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) Approval is for the subdivision of one existing 11.18-acre parcel into two parcels consisting of a .47-acre parcel and a 10.71-acre parcel within the existing shopping center at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue-APN: 0227-151-38. 2) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development and Municipal Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances. 3) Prior to recordation of the final map, the applicant shall submit to the City applicable recorded documentation that establishes, and/or ensures continuation of, agreements,easements, etc. for the purpose of mutual/reciprocal use, access, parking, and maintenance. Statements noting these agreements shall be included on the final map. 4) Any revision to the design of the approved subdivision shall require review and approval by the Planning Manager. • Engineering Services Department 1) The final parcel map shall be submitted for review and approval. Plan check fees will be required and determined at the time of submittal. 2) Prior to the issuance of Building Permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50 percent of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills,and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department when the first Building Permit application is submitted to Building and Safety. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. 3) Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map. 4) Reciprocal parking agreements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all common roads,drives or parking areas shall be provided by CC&Rs or deeds and shall be recorded prior to, or concurrent with the final parcel map. • Items D-F 31 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-44 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19433—FOUNTAINHEAD DEVELOPMENT October 23, 2013 Page 4 Grading • 1) The applicant shall prepare or amend the existing CC&Rs as needed to clarify how maintenance responsibilities will be shared between the newly created parcels and the remaining existing parcels of Parcel Map (SUBTPM19433) prior to approval of the Parcel Map. The Grading and Drainage Plan and the CC&Rs shall address shared access to Foothill Boulevard, private storm drains, surface drainage, and maintenance of common areas, including landscaping within the public rights-of-way and BMPs identified in the WQMP. WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN 1) A Storm Water Quality Management Plan shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. 2) The Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) submitted with the application does not follow current WQMP templates/guidance and regulations set forth by the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control board (RWQCB). Access the following website for an updated San Bernardino County Water Quality Management Plan(WQMP)for New Development and Redevelopment Projects: http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/rwqcb8/html/sb wgmp html. • 3) This site provides Guidance and Templates that can be filled out electronically and printed. Adhere to these guidelines and use the templates provided. Also, include the BMPs identified in the plan on the Grading Plans when submitted for plan check. 4) The Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared by Fitzmaurice Consulting-Civil Engineering, dated July 24, 2013, is deemed "Incomplete." The following comments are required to be completed prior to issuance of a Building Permit: Section Page ; .,'rs `,, - ,;,;A,s}"<£;,. Comments w,.. This document shall be completed using the current adopted San Bernardino County model template for the Water Quality Management Plan. • Items D-F 32 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-44 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19433—FOUNTAINHEAD DEVELOPMENT October 23, 2013 Page 5 • 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF OCTOBER 2013. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Frances Howdyshell, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed,and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 23rd day of October 2013, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: • ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: • Items D-F 33 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT#: SUBTPM19433 SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP APPLICANT: FOUNTAINHEAD DEVELOPMENT NORTHWEST CORNER OF ROCHESTER AVENUE AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD - LOCATION: APN: 0227-151-38. ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General Requirements Completion Date • 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Approval of Tentative Parcel Map No. 19433 is granted subject to the approval of the Planning Commission. 3. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. 13-44 and Standard Conditions shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 4. The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below. The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Manager hearing. a) Notice of Exemption -$50 X • 1 Items D-F 34 Project No. SUBTPM19433 Completion Date B. Time Limits 1. This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the _/_/_ • Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the Engineering Services Department within 3 years from the date of the approval. C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which Include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, the Development Code regulations, and the Terra Vista Community Plan. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager. 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Services Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance and final acceptance granted prior to occupancy. 4. Revised Site Plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Planning Manager review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development _/_/_ • Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 7. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Manager and Police Department(477-2800) prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 8. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, and the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to Planning Manager review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 9. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 10. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination and in conformance with Building and Safety Services Department standards, the Municipal Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department (RCFD) Standards. 11. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Manager and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 2 • Items D-F 35 Project No. SUBTPM19433 Completion Date D. SHOPPING CENTERS • 1. Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours. 2. The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and in no event shall trash and debris remain for more than 24 hours. 3. Signs shall be conveniently posted for"no overnight parking". 4. All operations and businesses shall be conducted to comply with the following standards which shall be incorporated into the lease agreements for all tenants: a. Noise Level - All commercial activities shall not create any noise that would exceed an exterior noise level of 60 dB during the hours of 10 p.m. until 7 a.m. and 65 dB during the hours of 7 a.m. until 10 p.m. (Table 17.66.050-1) b. Loading and Unloading - No person shall cause the loading, unloading, opening, closing, or other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials, garbage cans, or other similar objects between the hours of 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. unless otherwise specified herein, in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to a residential area. 5. The lighting fixture design shall compliment the architectural program. It shall include the plaza area lighting fixtures, building lighting fixtures (exterior), and parking lot lighting fixtures. E. Building Design • 1. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections shall be screened from all sides and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically more than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet, shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent nature with the building design and is detailed consistent with the building. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically less than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet shall be painted consistent with the color scheme of the building. Details shall be included in building plans. 2. For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main building colors F. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 17 feet long with a required 1-foot overhang (e.g., over a curb stop). 2. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet. 3. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. • 3 Items D-F 36 Project No SUBTPM19433 Completion Date G. Landscaping 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect _�_�_ • and submitted for Planning Manager review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development. 2. Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in accordance with the Development Code Section 17.80.050, and so noted on the grading plans. The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown•on the detailed landscape plans. The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods. 3. A minimum of 20 percent of trees planted within industrial projects, and a minimum of 30 percent within commercial and office projects, shall be specimen size trees - 24-inch box or larger. 4. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls. 5. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building. 6. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Manager review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Services Department. 7. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water efficient landscaping per Development Code Chapter 17.82. H. Signs • 1. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with Uniform Sign Program #124 and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs. I. Building and Safety Industrial and Commercial Standard Conditions 1. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan; C. Floor Plan; d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan; e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and g. Planning Department Project Number (SUBTPM19433) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 4 • Items D-F 37 Project No. SUBTPM19433 Completion Date 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, two sets of energy conservation calculations, and • a soils report. Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance. 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. _/—/- 5. Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the Building and Safety Services Department. 6. Developers wishing to participate in the Community Energy Efficiency Program (CEEP) can contact the Building and Safety Services Department staff for information and submittal requirements. Site Development 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be marked with the project file number (SUBTPM19433). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Services Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of Building Permits for a new residential project or major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees. The applicant shall provide a copy of the • School Fees receipt to the Building and Safety Services Department prior to permit issuance 3. Prior to issuance of permit issuance for a new residential project or major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, and Transportation Development Fee. 4. Prior to issuance of Building Permits for a new commercial or industrial development project or major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees. The applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Services Department prior to permits issuance. 5. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tract/parcel map recordation and prior to issuance of Building Permits. 6. For projects using septic tank facilities, shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval prior to the issuance of Septic Tank Permits, and prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 7. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. B. Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Department public counter). • 5 Items D-F 38 Project No. SUBTPM19433 Completion Date 9. All commercial/public/multi-family development swimming pool plans shall be submitted to the County of San Bernardino's Environmental Health Services Department for review and approval prior to approval from the City of Rancho Cucamonga. • 10. The following is required for side yard use for increase in allowable area: _/—/— a. Provide a reduced Site Plan (8 1/2-inches by 11 inches), which indicates the non- buildable easement. b. Recorded "Covenant and Agreement for the Maintenance of a Non-Buildable Easement,"which is signed by the appropriate property owner(s). New Structures 1. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness. 2. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. 3. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's"high wind" instructions. 4. Plans for food preparation areas shall be approved by County of San Bernardino Environmental Health Services prior to issuance of Building Permits. 5. Provide draft stops in attic areas in accordance with CBC Section 1505. —/_/- 6. Roofing materials shall be Class"A." —/—/- 7. Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with CBC 8. Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC. —/_/— • 9. Walls and floors separating dwelling units in the same building shall be in accordance with the CBC. 10. Provide smoke and heat venting in accordance with CBC. —/—/— 11. Upon plan check submittal, additional requirements may be needed. J. Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The grading and drainage plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual grading and drainage plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 3. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 4. A separate Grading and Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards 6 • Items D-F 39 Project No. SUBTPM19433 Completion Date or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, • stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer. 5. If human remains are discovered on-site before or during grading, no further disturbance shall occur occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98 and California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5. 6. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and —�—�— place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit. 7. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a Grading Permit. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. 8. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage easements prior prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit. 9. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the latest adopted California Plumbing Plumbing Code. 10. The maximum parking stall gradient is 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per per the current adopted California Building Code. 11. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Building Code. 12. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy the engineer of record shall certify the —�—�— • functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) best management practices(BMP) devices K. Water Quality Management Plan 1. A Storm Water Quality Management Plan shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official and and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be recorded prior to the Issuance of a Grading Permit 2. The Water Quality Management Plan shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. L. L. Commercial Fire Standard Conditions FSC -1 Public and Private Water Supply 1. Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants: Reference the RCFPD Standard 5-10. FSC-2 Fire Fire Flow 1. The required fire flow for this project is calculated gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of of 20 pounds per square inch. This requirement is made in accordance with California Fire Code Appendix, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances. The required minimum fire flow for this project may be reduced by 50 percent when automatic fire sprinklers are installed. • 7 Items D-F 40 Project No. SUBTPM19433 Completion Date 2. Public fire hydrants located within the immediate vicinity of the proposed project may be used to provide the required fire flow subject to Fire District review and approval. Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow. • 3. Fire protection water supply plans are required for all projects that must extend the existing —/—/— water supply to or onto the site. Building Permits will not be issued until the fire protection water supply plans are approved. 4. On all Site Plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of —/—/— the proposed project site. FSC-3 Prerequisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems —/—/— Prior to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire sprinkler system, the applicant shall —/—/— submit plans, specifications and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground supply piping. Approval of the underground supply piping system must be obtained prior to submitting the overhead fire sprinkler system plans. FSC-4 Requirements for Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Automatic fire sprinklers shall be installed in buildings as required by the current editions of the —/—/— California Fire Code, the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance and/or any other applicable standards that require an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed. FSC-5 Fire Alar System &Sprinkler Monitoring The current edition California Building/Fire Codes, the RCFPD Ordinance and Fire Alarm —/—/— Standard require most fire sprinkler systems to be monitored by a Central Station sprinkler monitoring system. A manual and or automatic fire alarm system may also be required based on the use and occupancy of the building. Plan check approval and a Building Permit are required • prior to the installation of a fire alarm or a sprinkler monitoring system. Plans and specifications shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services in accordance with RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard. Refer to the specified documents for the system requirements. FSC-6 Fire District Site Access: Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private roads, drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes. Please reference the RCFPD Fire Department Access Roadways Standard. 1. Location of Access: All portions of the structures 1st story exterior wall shall be located —/—/— within 150-feet of Fire District vehicle access, measured on an approved route around the exterior of the building. Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates and fences are deemed obstructions. 2. Specifications for private Fire District Access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are: —/—/— a. The minimum unobstructed width is 26 feet. b. The maximum inside turn radius shall be 24 feet. c. The minimum outside turn radius shall be 50 feet. d. The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 45 feet. e. The minimum vertical clearance is 14 feet, 6 inches. f. At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20 feet on each side. g. The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9 degrees or 20 percent. h. The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12 percent. • 6 Items D-F 41 Project No. SUBTPM19433 Completion Date i. Support a minimum load of 80,000 pounds gross vehicle weight(GVW). • j. Trees and shrubs planted adjacent to the fire lane shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14-feet, 6-inches from the ground up. Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus. 3. Access Doorways Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be —/—/— provided as follows: a. In buildings without high-piled storage, access shall be provided in accordance with the current edition of California Building/Fire Codes and/or any other applicable standards. b. In buildings with high-piled storage access doors shall be provided in each 100 lineal feet or major fraction thereof, of the exterior wall that faces the required access roadways. When railways are installed provisions shall be made to maintain Fire District access to all required openings. 4. Access Walkways: Hardscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus —/—/— access road to all required building exterior openings. 5. Building Access: Knox boxes for site and building access are required in accordance with —/—/— RCFPD Standard 5-9. 6. Commercial/Industrial Gates: Any gate installed across a Fire Department access road —/—/— shall be in accordance with the Fire District Standard. The following design requirements apply: a. Prior to the fabrication and installation of the gates, plans are required to be submitted to Fire Construction Services (FCS) for approval. Upon the completion of the • installation and before placing the gates in service, inspection and final acceptance must be requested from FCS. b. Gates must slide open horizontally or swing inward. c. Gates may be motorized or manual. d. When fully open, the minimum clearance dimension of drive access shall be 20 feet. e. Manual gates must be equipped with a RCFPD lock. The lock must be purchased at the Fire Administration Office. f. Motorized gates must open at the rate of one-foot per second. g. The motorized gate actuation mechanism must be equipped with a manual override device and a fail-safe or battery backup feature to open the gate or release the locking Mechanism in case of power failure or mechanical malfunction. h. Motorized gates shall be equipped with a Knox override key switch. The switch must be installed outside the gate in a visible and unobstructed location. i. For motorized gates, a traffic loop device must be installed to allow exiting from the complex. j. If traffic pre-emption devices (TPD) are to be installed, the device, location and operation must be approved by the Fire Chief prior to installation. Bi-directional or multiple sensors may be required due to complexity of the various entry configurations. 7. Fire Lane Identification: Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes. A Site Plan —/—/— illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department for approval. • 9 Items D-F 42 Project No. SUBTPM19433 Completion Date 8. Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly —/—/— noted on the Site Plan. A copy of the approved Alternative Method application, if • applicable, must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to B&S for plan review. 9. Roof Access: Must be in accordance with the RCFPD Roof Access Standard 5-6. There —/—/— shall be a means of Fire Department access from the exterior walls of the buildings onto the roofs of all commercial, industrial, and multi-family residential structures more than 10,000 square feet or with roof more than 15 feet in height and less than 75 feet above the level of the fire access road. a. This access must be reachable by the Fire Department aerial ladder. b. A minimum of one ladder point with a fixed ladder shall be provided in buildings with construction features, or high parapets that inhibit roof access. c. The number of ladder points may be required to be increased, depending on the building size and configuration. d. Regardless of the parapet height or construction features the approved ladder point shall be identified in accordance to the roof access standard. e. Where the entire roof access is restricted by high parapet walls or other obstructions, a permanently mounted access ladder is required. f. Multiple access ladders may be required for larger buildings. g. Ladder construction must be in accordance with the RCFPD Roof Access Standard Appendix. h. A Site Plan showing the locations of the roof ladder shall be submitted during plan check. i. Ladder points shall face a fire access roadway(s). FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits —/—/— • Listed are those Fire Code permits commonly associated with the business operations and/or building construction. Plan check submittal is required with the permit application for approval of the permit; field inspection is required prior to permit issuance. General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not specifically described below, which in the judgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property. • Candles and open Flames in public assemblies • Compressed Gases • Dry Cleaning Plants • Explosive or Blasting Agents • Repair Garages • Refrigeration Systems • Public Assembly • Tents, Canopies and/or Air Supported Structures • LPG or Gas Fuel Vehicles in Assembly Buildings FSC-12 Hazardous Materials – Submittal to Fire Construction Services. Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction of buildings and/or the installation of equipment designed to store, use or dispense hazardous materials in accordance with the current editions of the California Building, Fire, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical Codes, RCFPD Ordinances and other implemented and/or adopted standards. 10 • Items D-F 43 Project No. SUBTPM19433 Completion Date FSC -13 Alternate Method Application - Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal _/_/_ . will review all requests for alternate method, when submitted. The request must be submitted on the Fire District "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the review fee. Map Recordation 1. Reciprocal Agreements for Fire Department Emergency Access and Water Supply are required on this project. The project appears to be located on a property that is being subdivided. The reciprocal agreement is required to be recorded between property owners and the Fire District. The recorded agreement shall include a copy of the Site Plan. The Fire Construction Services shall approve the agreement, prior to recordation. The agreement shall be recorded with the County of San Bernardino, Recorder's Office. 2. Reciprocal Access Agreement — Please provide a permanent access agreement between the owners granting irrevocable and a non-exclusive easement, favoring the Fire District to gain access to the subject property. The agreement shall include a statement that no obstruction, gate, fence, building or other structure shall be placed within the dedicated access, without Fire Department approval. The agreement shall have provisions for emergency situations and the assessing of cost recovery to the property by the Fire District. 3. Reciprocal Water Covenant — Please provide a permanent maintenance and service covenant between the owners granting an irrevocable and non-exclusive easement, favoring the Fire District for the purpose of accessing and maintaining the private water mains, valves and fire hydrants (fire protection systems facilities in general). The covenant shall have provisions for emergency situations and the assessing of cost recovery to the property by the Fire District. FSC-15 Annexation of the parcel map: Annexation of the parcel map Into the Community Facilities District#85-1 or#88-1 is required prior to the issuance of Grading or Building Permits. • Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS - Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any Building Permits: 1. Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit construction plans, _/_/_ specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District. Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District Standards. Approval of the on-site (private) fire underground and water plans is required prior to any Building Permit issuance for any structure on the site. Private on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards. The Building and Safety Services Department and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections. All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. Fire construction Services will inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 2. Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CVWD. On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the project. Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard. All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. CVWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing. Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CVWD. Fire Construction Services • must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 11 Items D-F 44 Project No. SUBTPM19433 Completion Date 3. Construction Access: The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the _/_ requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14'6"above the finished surface of the road. • 4. Fire Flow: A current fire flow letter from CVWD must be received. The applicant is _/_/_ responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CVWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services. 5. Easements and Reciprocal Agreements: All easements and agreements must be recorded with the County of San Bernardino. PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The building construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services' "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures." PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION—Please complete the following: 1. Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers". On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location. 2. Private Fire Hydrants: For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on-site fire hydrants. The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for hiring the company to perform the test. A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available. The fire flow available must meet or exceed the required fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code. 3. Fire Sprinkler System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler _/_/_ • system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. 4. Fire Sprinkler Monitoring: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler monitoring system must be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. The fire sprinkler monitoring system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system (subject to the release of power). 5. Fire Suppression Systems and/or other special hazard protection systems shall be inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services before occupancy is granted and/or equipment is placed in service. 6. Fire Alarm System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm system shall be installed, inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. 7. Access Control Gates: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards by Fire Construction Services. 8. Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services. 9. The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways. 12 • Items D-F 45 Project No. SUBTPM19433 Completion Date 10. Address: Must be in accordance with the RCFPD Standard 5-7, 5-8 and/or 5-5. Prior to the —/—/— • issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commercial/industrial and multi-family buildings shall post the address in accordance to the appropriate RCFPD addressing Standard. 11. Hazardous Materials: The applicant must obtain inspection and acceptance by Fire —/—/— Construction Services. 12. Confidential Business Occupancy Information: The applicant shall complete the Rancho —/—/— Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form. This form provides contact information for Fire District use in the event of an emergency at the subject building or property. This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector. 13. Mapping Site Plan: Must be in accordance with the RCFPD Standard 5-11. Prior to the —/—/— issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a 8 1/2-inch by 11-inch or 11-inch by 17-inch Site Plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and building features as required in the standard. The Site Plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector. THE APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: M. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1. Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs or —/—/— by deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or prior to the issuance of Building Permits, where no map is involved. 2. Reciprocal parking agreements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint —/—/— • maintenance of all common roads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by CC & R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to, or concurrent with, the final parcel map. N. Street Improvements 1. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. O. Utilities 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, —/—/— gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. —/—/- 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the —/—/— Cucamonga Valley Water District(CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and • the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, 13 Items D-F 46 Project No. SUBTPM19433 Completion Date whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. • 4. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. —/—/— Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. P. General Requirements and Approvals 1. Prior to the issuance of Building Permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative —/—/— fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50 percent of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department when the first Building Permit application is submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. • 14 • Items D-F 47 RESOLUTION NO. 13-42 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT/DESIGN REVIEW DRC2013-00458, A REQUEST TO DEVELOP A 4,994 SQUARE FOOT BUILDING WITHIN AN EXISTING SHOPPING CENTER AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF ROCHESTER AVENUE AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD IN THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL (CC) DISTRICT OF THE TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 11884 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0227-151-38. A. Recitals. 1. Fountainhead Development filed an application for the approval of Development Review DRC2013-00458, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as"the application." 2. On the 23rd day of October 2013, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. • NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on October 23, 2013, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The project area is located on an 11.18-acre parcel located at 11884 Foothill Boulevard within an existing shopping center within the Community Commercial(CC) District of the Terra Vista Community Plan at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue; and b. The subject shopping center currently consists of various businesses including a fast food drive-thru restaurant, a sit-down restaurant, a gas station, a home improvement store, a tire store as well as other auto and commercial retail stores; and C. The property to the north of the subject site contains single-family residences and is within the Low Medium (LM) Residential District within the Terra Vista Community Plan;the property to the south consists of commercial retail buildings and is within the Community Commercial (CC) Districtwithin the Terra Vista Community Plan;the property to the east contains a retail commercial center within the Community Commercial(CC) District as well as single-family residences within the Low Residential (L) District; and the property to the west is vacant land within the Community Commercial (CC) District; and • Items D-F 48 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-42 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2013-00458— FOUNTAINHEAD DEVELOPMENT October 23, 2013 Page 2 d. The project proposes the development of a.47-acre parcel with a 4,994 square foot • building. The building will include an automotive servicing area that will accommodate a maximum of 8 vehicles, a tire storage room, as well as a sales and waiting area. The dimensions of the building footprint will be approximately 150 feet wide by 36 feet deep; and e. The architecture of the building will generally match the established theme throughout the shopping center and will incorporate stucco coated walls,concrete S-tile roof on the tower at the south end of the building, EI Dorado stone veneer placed on the columns at various locations of the building,a wood decorative awning, clear anodized aluminum storefront, and metal roll up doors to provide access to the service bays. The building will have a maximum height of 28 feet; and f. The proposal also includes the installation of a detached accessory structure that will be used to house the trash bins as well as used tire storage.The accessory structure will match the material, color, and style of the primary building; and g. Per Section 17.64 of the Development Code, parking is calculated for vehicle service uses at 2.5 spaces for every 1,000 square feet of building area. Therefore, a total of 13 parking spaces are required for this use. Since the project includes a total of 17 parking spaces, the site will contain sufficient parking. Furthermore, although the proposed development will require the removal of 66 parking spaces throughout the shopping center,936 overall parking spaces will be provided, 174 of which are surplus parking spaces. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: • a. The proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan, which encourages in-fill commercial development. The General Plan states that attention to the design of infill development is essential to ensure that the new development fits in with the established physical context and gains acceptance from the surrounding neighborhoods. This project fits with the established character of the built environment; and b. The proposed project is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located in that the architecture and improvements will meet the standards and guidelines established in the Development Code; and C. The proposed project is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. In addition to the installation of a 4,994 square foot building, the site will contain sufficient landscaping and parking; and d. The proposed project, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The proposed development is compatible with the surrounding shopping center. 4. The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies under the Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 (In-Fill Development Projects) because as the project is consistent with the • Items D-F 49 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-42 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2013-00458— FOUNTAINHEAD DEVELOPMENT October 23, 2013 Page 3 • applicable General Plan designation and all applicable General Plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations,the proposed development occurs within City limits on a project site of no more than 5 acres substantially surrounded by urban uses, the project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species, approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality, and'the site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. In addition, there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staffs determination of exemption. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Plannin 1) Approval is for the development of a 4,994 square foot building located on a .47-acre site within the existing shopping center at the northwest comer of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue-APN: 0227-151-38. 2) The design of the proposed building shall be consistent with the plans submitted and reviewed by the Design Review Committee and approved by the Planning Commission. Final design review shall be subject to Planning Manager review and approval at Building Permit • plan check review. 3) The tower element shall incorporate concrete tile roof material to match the concrete tile used throughout the shopping center. 4) EI Dorado stone veneer shall be incorporated on the proposed building as shown on the elevations reviewed by the Planning Commission. 5) The wood framing element indicated on the tower feature of the proposed building shall be designed and constructed to match the architecture used on the existing buildings throughout the shopping center. 6) All roof drain downspouts shall be routed through the interior of the building. 7) The color of the metal doors shown on the south and west building elevations shall match the colors indicated on the building elevations reviewed by the Planning Commission. 8) The interior of the raised roof parapets and cornice shall be painted to match the exterior colors. 9) The proposed trees, shrubs, ground cover, and planters shall be consistent with the Landscape Plan reviewed by the Planning • Commission. Items D-F 50 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-42 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2013-00458— FOUNTAINHEAD DEVELOPMENT October 23, 2013 Page 4 10) The proposed trash enclosure/tire storage accessory building shall be • architecturally compatible with the primary building on this parcel. Final design review shall be subject to Planning Manager review and approval at Building Permit plan check review. 11) The height of any relocated parking lot lights shall remain consistent with the height of the existing parking lot lights. 12) All parking lot striping shall be double striped to match the existing parking lot striping. 13) All proposed retaining walls shall be stucco coated with texture and paint to match the primary building on this parcel. 14) Any new ground-mounted equipment and utility boxes, including transformers, back-flow devices,etc., shall be screened by a minimum of two rows of shrubs spaced 18-inches on center. This equipment shall be painted forest green. 15) Any new Double Detector Checks (DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) that are required and/or proposed shall be screened behind a 4-foot high block wall. These walls shall have a decorative finish to match the architecture of the primary building on this parcel. 16) All proposed signs shall comply with the Uniform Sign Program (USP) • #124. 17) All signs shall require review and approval of a Sign Permit application by the Planning Manager prior to installation. 18) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations Uniform Building Code, or any other City ordinances. 19) Any revision to the approved plans shall require review and approval by the Planning Manager. Engineering Services Department 1) The final parcel map shall be submitted for review and approval. Plan check fees will be required and determined at the time of submittal. 2) Prior to the issuance of Building Permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50 percent of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department when the first Building Permit • Items D-F 51 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-42 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2013-00458 —FOUNTAINHEAD DEVELOPMENT October 23, 2013 Page 5 • application is submitted to Building and Safety Services Department. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. 3) Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC & Rs) or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map. 4) Reciprocal parking agreements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all common roads,drives or parking areas shall be provided by CC & Rs or deeds and shall be recorded prior to, or concurrent with the final parcel map. Gradin 1) The applicant shall prepare or amend existing CC&Rs as needed to clarify how maintenance responsibilities will be shared between the newly created parcels and the remaining existing parcels of Parcel Map (SUBTPM19433) prior to approval of the Parcel Map. The Grading and Drainage Plan and the CC&Rs shall address shared access to Foothill Boulevard, private storm drains, surface drainage and maintenance of common areas, including landscaping within public rights-of-way and Best Management Practices identified in the Water • Quality Management Program (WQMP). WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN 1) A Storm Water Quality Management Plan shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. 2) The WQMP submitted with the application does not follow current WQMP templates/guidance and regulations set forth by the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control board (RWQCB). Access the following website for an updated San Bernardino County Water Quality Management Plan(WQMP)for New Development and Redevelopment Projects: hftp://www.swrcb.ca.gov/rwqcb8/html/sb wgmp html. 3) This site provides Guidance and Templates that can be filled out electronically and printed. Adhere to these guidelines and use the templates provided. Also, include the BMPs identified in the plan on the Grading Plans when submitted for plan check. 4) The Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared by Fitzmaurice Consulting-Civil Engineering, dated July 24, 2013, is deemed "Incomplete." The following comments are required to be • completed prior to issuance of a Building Permit: Items D-F 52 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1342 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2O13-0O458— FOUNTAINHEAD DEVELOPMENT October 23. 2O13 Page This document shall be completed using the current adopted San Bernardino County model template for the Water Quality Management G. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RDDAY OFOCTOBER 2O13. PLANNING COMMISSION OFTHE CITY OFRANCHO CUCAM{}NGA BY: Frances Howdyshell, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary 1, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 23rd day of October 2013, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Items D'F53 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT#: DRC2013-00458 SUBJECT: DESIGN REVIEW APPLICANT: FOUNTAINHEAD DEVELOPMENT NORTHWEST CORNER OF ROCHESTER AVENUE AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD — LOCATION: APN: 0227-151-38. ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General Requirements Completion Data • 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, is agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. 13-42 and Standard Conditions shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 3. The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below. The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Manager hearing. a) Notice of Exemption -$50 X B. Time Limits 1. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. • 1 Items D-F 54 Project No. DRC2013-00458 Completion Date C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which _/_/_ • include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, the Development Code regulations, and the Terra Vista Community Plan. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager. 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Services Department to show compliance The buildings shall be inspected for compliance and final acceptance granted prior to occupancy. 4. Revised Site Plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Planning Manager review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 7. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Manager and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method • of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 8. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, and the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to Planning Manager review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 9. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 10. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination and in conformance with Building and Safety Services Department standards, the Municipal Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department (RCFD) Standards. 11. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Manager and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits. D. SHOPPING CENTERS 1. Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours. —/—/- 2 • Items D-F 55 Project No. DRC2013-00458 Completion Date 2. The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and in no event shall —/—/— • trash and debris remain for more than 24 hours. 3. Signs shall be conveniently posted for"no overnight parking". —/—/- 4. All operations and businesses shall be conducted to comply with the following standards —/—/— which shall be incorporated into the lease agreements for all tenants: a. Noise Level - All commercial activities shall not create any noise that would exceed an exterior noise level of 60 dB during the hours of 10 p.m. until 7 a.m. and 65 dB during the hours of 7 a.m. until 10 p.m. (Table 17.66 050-1) b. Loading and Unloading - No person shall cause the loading, unloading, opening, _/—/— closing, or other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials, garbage cans, or other similar objects between the hours of 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. unless otherwise specified herein; in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to a residential area. 5. The lighting fixture design shall compliment the architectural program. It shall include the _/—/— plaza area lighting fixtures, building lighting fixtures (exterior), and parking lot lighting fixtures. E. Building Design 1. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or —/—/— projections shall be screened from all sides and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the • Planning Manager. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically more than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet, shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent nature with the building design and is detailed consistent with the building. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically less than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet shall be painted consistent with the color scheme of the building. Details shall be included in building plans. 2. For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main —/—/— building colors. F. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 17 feet long with a required 1-foot overhang (e.g., —/_/— over a curb stop). 2. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet. —/—/- 3. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, _/—/— entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. G. Landscaping 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect —/—/— and submitted for Planning Manager review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development. • 2. Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in accordance accordance with the Development Code Section 17.80.050, and so noted on the grading 3 Items D-F 56 Project No. DRC2013-00458 Completion Date plans. The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans. The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and • trimming methods. 3. A minimum of 20 percent of trees planted within industrial projects, and a minimum of 30 —/—/— percent within commercial and office projects, shall be specimen size trees - 24-inch box or larger. 4. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three —/—/— parking stalls. 5. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of —/—/— one tree per 30 linear feet of building. 6. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be —/—/— included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Manager review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Services Department. 7. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of —/—/— water efficient landscaping per Development Code Chapter 17.82. H. Signs 1. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this —/—/— approval. Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with Uniform Sign Program #124 and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs. I. Building and Safety Industrial and Commercial Standard Conditions —/—/— • 1. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: —/—/— a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan; C. Floor Plan; d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan; e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and g. Planning Department Project Number (DRC2013-00458) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, two sets of energy conservation calculations, and —/—/— a soils report. Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation —/—/— coverage to the City prior to permit issuance. 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. —/—/- 4 • Items D-F 57 Project No. DRC2013-00458 Completion Date 5. Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by • the Building and Safety Services Department. 6. Developers wishing to participate in the Community Energy Efficiency Program (CEEP) can contact the Building and Safety Services Department staff for information and submittal requirements. Site Development 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be marked with the project file number (DRC2013-00458). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Services Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of Building Permits for a new residential project or major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees. The applicant shall provide a copy of the School Fees receipt to the Building and Safety Services Department prior to permit issuance. 3. Prior to issuance of permit issuance for a new residential project or major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, and Transportation Development Fee. 4. Prior to issuance of Building Permits for a new commercial or industrial development project • or major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees. The applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Services Department prior to permits issuance. 5. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tract/parcel map recordation and prior to issuance of Building Permits. 6. For projects using septic tank facilities, shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval prior to the issuance of Septic Tank Permits, and prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 7. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. 8. Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Department public counter). 9. All commercial/public/multi-family development swimming pool plans shall be submitted to the County of San Bernardino's Environmental Health Services Department for review and approval prior to approval from the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 10. The following is required for side yard use for increase in allowable area: _/—/— a. Provide a reduced Site Plan (8 1/2-inches by 11 inches), which indicates the non- buildable easement. • 5 Items D-F 58 Project No DRC2013-00458 Completion Date b. Recorded "Covenant and Agreement for the Maintenance of a Non-Buildable Easement,"which is signed by the appropriate property owner(s). New Structures • 1. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances considering use,use, area, and fire-resistiveness. 2. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. 3. Roofing Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's"high wind" instructions. 4. Plans Plans for food preparation areas shall be approved by County of San Bernardino Environmental Health Health Services prior to issuance of Building Permits. 5. Provide draft stops in attic areas in accordance with CBC Section 1505. 6. Roofing materials shall be Class"A." 7. Exterior Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with CBC 8. Openings Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC. 9. Walls Walls and floors separating dwelling units in the same building shall be in accordance with the CBC. CBC. 10. Provide smoke and heat venting in accordance with CBC. 11. Upon Upon plan check submittal, additional requirements may be needed. —f_f— • J. Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code,Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The grading and drainage plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual grading and drainage plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 3. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed,completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 4. A separate Grading and Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer. 5. If human remains are discovered on-site before or during grading, no further disturbance shall occur occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98 and California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5. 6 • Items D-F 59 Project No. DRC2013-00458 Completion Date 6. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and —�—�— . place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit. 7. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a Grading Permit. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. 8. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage easements prior prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit. 9. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the latest adopted California Plumbing Plumbing Code. 10. The maximum parking stall gradient is 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per per the current adopted California Building Code. 11. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Building Code. 12. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) best management practices (BMP) devices. K. Water Quality Management Plan 1. A Storm Water Quality Management Plan shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official and and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit • 2. The Water Quality Management Plan shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. L. L. Commercial Fire Standard Conditions FSC -1 Public and Private Water Supply 1. Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants: Reference the RCFPD Standard 5-10. FSC-2 Fire Fire Flow 1. The required fire flow for this project is calculated gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of of 20 pounds per square inch. This requirement is made in accordance with California Fire Code Appendix, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances. The required minimum fire flow for this project may be reduced by 50 percent when automatic fire sprinklers are installed. 2. Public fire hydrants located within the immediate vicinity of the proposed project may be used to to provide the required fire flow subject to Fire District review and approval. Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow. 3. Fire protection water supply plans are required for all projects that must extend the existing water supply supply to or onto the site. Building Permits will not be issued until the fire protection water supply plans are approved. 4. On all Site Plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed proposed project site. • 7 Items D-F 60 Project No. DRC2013-00458 Completion Date FSC-3 Prerequisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems —/—/— Prior to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire sprinkler system, the applicant shall —/—/— • submit plans, specifications and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground supply piping. Approval of the underground supply piping system must be obtained prior to submitting the overhead fire sprinkler system plans. FSC-4 Requirements for Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Automatic fire sprinklers shall be installed in buildings as required by the current editions of the —/—/— California Fire Code, the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance and/or any other applicable standards that require an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed. FSC-5 Fire Alarm System & Sprinkler Monitoring The current edition California Building/Fire Codes, the RCFPD Ordinance and Fire Alarm —/—/— Standard require most fire sprinkler systems to be monitored by a Central Station sprinkler monitoring system. A manual and or automatic fire alarm system may also be required based on the use and occupancy of the building. Plan check approval and a Building Permit are required prior to the installation of a fire alarm or a sprinkler monitoring system. Plans and specifications shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services in accordance with RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard. Refer to the specified documents for the system requirements. FSC-6 Fire District Site Access: Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private roads, drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes. Please reference the RCFPD Fire Department Access Roadways Standard. 1. Location of Access: All portions of the structures 1st story exterior wall shall be located —/—/— within 150-feet of Fire District vehicle access, measured on an approved route around the exterior of the building. Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates and • fences are deemed obstructions. 2. Specifications for private Fire District Access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are: —/—/— a. The minimum unobstructed width is 26 feet. b. The maximum inside turn radius shall be 24 feet. c. The minimum outside turn radius shall be 50 feet. d. The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 45 feet. e. The minimum vertical clearance is 14 feet, 6 inches. f. At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20 feet on each side. g. The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9 degrees or 20 percent. h. The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12 percent. I. Support a minimum load of 80,000 pounds gross vehicle weight(GVW). j. Trees and shrubs planted adjacent to the fire lane shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14-feet, 6-inches from the ground up. Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus. 3. Access Doorways Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be —/—/— provided as follows: a. In buildings without high-piled storage, access shall be provided in accordance with the current edition of California Building/Fire Codes and/or any other applicable standards. • 8 Items D-F 61 Project No. DRC2013-00458 Completion Date • b. In buildings with high-piled storage access doors shall be provided in each 100 lineal feet or major fraction thereof, of the exterior wall that faces the required access roadways When railways are installed provisions shall be made to maintain Fire District access to all required openings. 4. Access Walkways: Hardscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus —/—/— access road to all required building exterior openings. 5. Building Access: Knox boxes for site and building access are required in accordance with —/—/— RCFPD Standard 5-9. 6. Commercial/Industrial Gates: Any gate installed across a Fire Department access road —/—/— shall be in accordance with the Fire District Standard. The following design requirements apply: a. Prior to the fabrication and installation of the gates, plans are required to be submitted to Fire Construction Services (FCS) for approval. Upon the completion of the installation and before placing the gates in service, inspection and final acceptance must be requested from FCS. b. Gates must slide open horizontally or swing inward. c. Gates may be motorized or manual. d. When fully open, the minimum clearance dimension of drive access shall be 20 feet. e. Manual gates must be equipped with a RCFPD lock. The lock must be purchased at the Fire Administration Office. f. Motorized gates must open at the rate of one-foot per second. • g. The motorized gate actuation mechanism must be equipped with a manual override device and a fail-safe or battery backup feature to open the gate or release the locking Mechanism in case of power failure or mechanical malfunction. h. Motorized gates shall be equipped with a Knox override key switch. The switch must be installed outside the gate in a visible and unobstructed location. i. For motorized gates, a traffic loop device must be installed to allow exiting from the complex. j. If traffic pre-emption devices (TPD) are to be installed, the device, location and operation must be approved by the Fire Chief prior to installation. Bi-directional or multiple sensors may be required due to complexity of the various entry configurations. 7. Fire Lane Identification: Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes. A Site Plan —/—/— illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department for approval. 8. Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly —/—/— noted on the Site Plan. A copy of the approved Alternative Method application, if applicable, must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to B&S for plan review. 9. Roof Access: Must be in accordance with the RCFPD Roof Access Standard 5-6. There —/—/— shall be a means of Fire Department access from the exterior walls of the buildings onto the roofs of all commercial, industrial, and multi-family residential structures more than 10,000 square feet or with roof more than 15 feet in height and less than 75 feet above the level of the fire access road. a. This access must be reachable by the Fire Department aerial ladder. • 9 Items D-F 62 Project No. DRC2013-00458 Completion Date b. A minimum of one ladder point with a fixed ladder shall be provided in buildings with construction features, or high parapets that inhibit roof access. • c. The number of ladder points may be required to be increased, depending on the building size and configuration. d. Regardless of the parapet height or construction features the approved ladder point shall be identified in accordance to the roof access standard. e. Where the entire roof access is restricted by high parapet walls or other obstructions, a permanently mounted access ladder is required. f. Multiple access ladders may be required for larger buildings. g. Ladder construction must be in accordance with the RCFPD Roof Access Standard Appendix. h. A Site Plan showing the locations of the roof ladder shall be submitted during plan check. i. Ladder points shall face a fire access roadway(s). FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits Listed are those Fire Code permits commonly associated with the business operations and/or building construction. Plan check submittal is required with the permit application for approval of the permit, field inspection is required prior to permit issuance. General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not specifically described below, which in the judgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property. • Candles and open flames in public assemblies • Compressed Gases • Dry Cleaning Plants • Explosive or Blasting Agents • • Repair Garages • Refrigeration Systems • Public Assembly • Tents, Canopies and/or Air Supported Structures • LPG or Gas Fuel Vehicles in Assembly Buildings FSC-12 Hazardous Materials — Submittal to Fire Construction Services. Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction of buildings and/or the installation of equipment designed to store, use or dispense hazardous materials in accordance with the current editions of the California Building, Fire, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical Codes, RCFPD Ordinances and other implemented and/or adopted standards. FSC -13 Alternate Method Application - Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal _/_/_ will review all requests for alternate method, when submitted. The request must be submitted on the Fire District "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the review fee. Map Recordation 1. Reciprocal Agreements for Fire Department Emergency Access and Water Supply are required on this project. The project appears to be located on a property that is being subdivided The reciprocal agreement is required to be recorded between property owners and the Fire District. The recorded agreement shall include a copy of the Site Plan, The Fire Construction Services shall approve the agreement, prior to recordation. The agreement shall be recorded with the County of San Bernardino, Recorder's Office. 10 • Items D-F 63 Project No. ORC2013-00458 Completion Date 2. Reciprocal Access Agreement — Please provide a permanent access agreement between • the owners granting irrevocable and a non-exclusive easement, favoring the Fire District to gain access to the subject property. The agreement shall include a statement that no obstruction, gate, fence, building or other structure shall be placed within the dedicated access, without Fire Department approval. The agreement shall have provisions for emergency situations and the assessing of cost recovery to the property by the Fire District. 3. Reciprocal Water Covenant — Please provide a permanent maintenance and service covenant between the owners granting an irrevocable and non-exclusive easement, favoring the Fire District for the purpose of accessing and maintaining the private water mains, valves and fire hydrants (fire protection systems facilities in general). The covenant shall have provisions for emergency situations and the assessing of cost recovery to the property by the Fire District. FSC-15 Annexation of the parcel map: Annexation of the parcel map into the Community Facilities District#85-1 or#88-1 is required prior to the issuance of Grading or Building Permits. Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS - Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any Building Permits: 1. Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District. Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District Standards. Approval of the on-site (private) fire underground and water plans is required prior to any Building Permit issuance for any structure on the site. Private on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards, The Building and Safety Services Department and Fire Construction Services • will perform plan checks and inspections. All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. Fire construction Services will inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 2. Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CVWD. On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the project. Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard. All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. CVWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing. Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CVWD. Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 3. Construction Access: The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard. All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14'6"above the finished surface of the road. 4. Fire Flow: A current fire flow letter from CVWD must be received. The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CVWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services. 5. Easements and Reciprocal Agreements: All easements and agreements must be recorded with the County of San Bernardino. • 11 Items D-F 64 Project No. DRC2013-00458 Completion Date PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The building construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services' "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures." • PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION—Please complete the following: 1. Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers". On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location. 2. Private Fire Hydrants: For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on-site fire hydrants. The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for hiring the company to perform the test. A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available. The fire flow available must meet or exceed the required fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code. 3. Fire Sprinkler System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. 4. Fire Sprinkler Monitoring: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler monitoring system must be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. The fire sprinkler monitoring system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system (subject to the release of power). 5. Fire Suppression Systems and/or other special hazard protection systems shall be inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services before occupancy is granted and/or equipment is placed in service. • 6. Fire Alarm System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm system shall be installed, inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. 7. Access Control Gates: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards by Fire Construction Services. 8. Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services. The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways. 9. Address: Must be in accordance with the RCFPD Standard 5-7, 5-8 and/or 5-5. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commercial/industrial and multi-family buildings shall post the address in accordance to the appropriate RCFPD addressing Standard. 10. Hazardous Materials: The applicant must obtain inspection and acceptance by Fire Construction Services. 12 • Items D-F 65 Project No. DRC2013-00458 Completion Date 11, Confidential Business Occupancy Information: The applicant shall complete the Rancho —/—/— . Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form. This form provides contact information for Fire District use in the event of an emergency at the subject building or property. This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector. 12. Mapping Site Plan: Must be in accordance with the RCFPD Standard 5-11. Prior to the —/—/— issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a 8 1/2-inch by 11-inch or 11-inch by 17-inch Site Plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and building features as required in the standard. The Site Plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector. THE APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: M. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1. Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CCBRs or —/—/— by deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or prior to the issuance of Building Permits, where no map is involved. 2. Reciprocal parking agreements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint —/—/— maintenance of all common roads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by CC& R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to, or concurrent with, the final parcel map. N. Street Improvements 1. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a —/—/— source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical • codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. O. Utilities 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, —/—/— gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV(all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. —/—/- 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the —/—/— Cucamonga Valley Water District(CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. • 13 Items D-F 66 Project No. DRC2013-00458 Completion Date 4. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. —/—/— Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received • from them. P. General Requirements and Approvals 1. Prior to the issuance of Building Permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative —/—/— fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50 percent of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department when the first Building Permit application is submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. • 14 • Items D-F 67 RESOLUTION NO. 13-43 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT MODIFICATION DRC2013-00459, A REQUEST TO AMEND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CUP95-11 TO MODIFY AN EXISTING MASTER PLAN TO ALLOW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 4,994 SQUARE FOOT BUILDING WITHIN AN EXISTING SHOPPING CENTER AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF ROCHESTERAVENUE AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD WITHIN THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL (CC) DISTRICT OF THE TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN, ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 11884 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD;AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF—APN: 0227-151-38. A. Recitals. 1. Fountainhead Development filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit Modification DRC2013-00459, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit Modification request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 23rd day of October 2013, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. • NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on October 23, 2013, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The project area is located on an 11.18-acre parcel located at 11884 Foothill Boulevard within an existing shopping center within the Community Commercial(CC) District of the Terra Vista Community Plan at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue; and b. The subject shopping center currently consists of various businesses including a fast food drive-thru restaurant, a sit-down restaurant, a gas station, a home improvement store,a tire store as well as other auto and commercial retail stores; and C. The property to the north of the subject site contains single-family residences and is within the Low Medium (LM)Residential District within the Terra Vista Community Plan;the property to the south consists of commercial retail buildings and is within the Community Commercial (CC) District within the Terra Vista Community Plan;the property to the east contains a retail commercial center within the Community Commercial(CC)District as well as single-family residences within the Low Residential (L) District; and the property to the west is vacant land within the Community • Commercial (CC) District; and Items D-F 68 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-43 DRC2013-00459— FOUNTAIHEAD DEVELOPMENT October 23, 2013 Page 2 d. The project proposes the development of a .47-acre parcel with a 4,994 square • building.The building will include an automotive servicing area that will accommodate a maximum of 8 vehicles, a tire storage room, as well as a sales and waiting area. The dimensions of the building footprint will be approximately 150 feet wide by 36 feet deep; and e. The architecture of the building will generally match the established theme throughout the shopping center and will incorporate stucco coated walls, concrete S-tile roof on the tower at the south end of the building, EI Dorado stone veneer placed on the columns at various locations of the building, a wood decorative awning, clear anodized aluminum storefront ,and metal roll up doors to provide access to the service bays. The building will have a maximum height of 28 feet; and f. The proposal also includes the installation of a detached accessory structure that will be used to house the trash bins as well as used tire storage. The accessory structure will match the material, color, and style of the primary building; and g. Per Section 17.64 of the Development Code, parking is calculated for vehicle service uses at 2.5 spaces for every 1,000 square feet of building area. Therefore, a total of 13 parking spaces are required for this use. Since the project includes a total of 17 parking spaces, the site will contain sufficient parking. Furthermore, although the proposed development will require the removal of 66 parking spaces throughout the shopping center, 936 overall parking spaces will be provided, 174 of which are surplus parking spaces. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and • 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan, which encourages in-fill commercial development is encouraged. The General Plan states that attention to the design of infill development is essential to ensure that the new development fits in with the established physical context and gains acceptance from the surrounding neighborhoods. This project fits with the established character of the built environment; and b. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The proposed development is compatible with the surrounding shopping center; and C. The proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. In addition to the installation of a 4,994 square foot building,the site will contain sufficient landscaping and parking. 4. The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies under the Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 (In-Fill Development Projects) because as the project is consistentwith the applicable General Plan designation and all applicable General Plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations, the proposed development occurs within City limits on a project site of • Items D-F 69 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-43 DRC2013-00459— FOUNTAIHEAD DEVELOPMENT October 23, 2013 Page 3 • no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses, the project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species, approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, orwater quality, and the site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. In addition, there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staffs determination of exemption. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) Approval is for the modification of Conditional Use Permit CUP95-11 to allow for the development of a 4,994 square foot building located on a .47-acre site within the existing shopping center at the northwest comer of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue - APN: 0227-151-38. 2) The design of the proposed building shall be consistent with the plans submitted and reviewed by the Design Review Committee and approved by the Planning Commission. Final design review shall be subject to Planning Manager review and approval at Building Permit plan check review. • 3) The tower element shall incorporate concrete tile roof material to match the concrete tile used throughout the shopping center. 4) EI Dorado stone veneer shall be incorporated on the proposed building as shown on the elevations reviewed by the Planning Commission. 5) The wood framing element indicated on the tower feature of the proposed building shall be designed and constructed to match the architecture used on the existing buildings throughout the shopping center. 6) All roof drain downspouts shall be routed through the interior of the building. 7) The color of the metal doors shown on the south and west building elevations shall match the colors.indicated on the building elevations reviewed by the Planning Commission. 8) The interior of the raised roof parapets and cornice shall be painted to match the exterior colors. 9) The proposed trees, shrubs, ground cover, and planters shall be consistent with the Landscape Plan reviewed by the Planning Commission. • Items D-F 70 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-43 DRC2013-00459— FOUNTAIHEAD DEVELOPMENT October 23, 2013 Page 4 10) The proposed trash enclosure/tire storage accessory building shall be • architecturally compatible with the primary building on this parcel. Final design review shall be subject to Planning Manager review and approval at Building Permit plan check review. 11) The height of any relocated parking lot lights shall remain consistent with the height of the existing parking lot lights. 12) All parking lot striping shall be double striped to match the existing parking lot striping. 13) All proposed retaining walls shall be stucco coated with texture and paint to match the primary building on this parcel. 14) Any new ground-mounted equipment and utility boxes, including transformers, back-flow devices,etc., shall be screened by a minimum of two rows of shrubs spaced 18-inches on center. This equipment shall be painted forest green. 15) Any new Double Detector Checks (DDC) and Fire Department Connections(FDC)that are required and/or proposed shall be screened behind a 4-foot high block wall. These walls shall have a decorative finish to match the architecture of the primary building on this parcel. 16) All proposed signs shall comply with Uniform Sign Program (USP) #124. • 17) All signs shall require review and approval of a Sign Permit application by the Planning Manager prior to installation. 18) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations Uniform Building Code, or any other City ordinances. 19) Any revision to the approved plans shall require review and approval by the Planning Manager. Engineering Services Department 1) The final parcel map shall be submitted for review and approval. Plan check fees will be required and determined at the time of submittal. 2) Prior to the issuance of Building Permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50 percent of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department when the first Building Permit application is submitted to Building and Safety Services Department. Form CD-2 shall be • Items D-F 71 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-43 DRC2013-00459— FOUNTAIHEAD DEVELOPMENT October 23, 2013 Page 5 • submitted to the Engineering Services Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. 3) Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC & Rs) or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map. 4) Reciprocal parking agreements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all common roads, drives or parking areas shall be provided by CC & Rs or deeds and shall be recorded prior to, or concurrent with the final parcel map. Gradin 1) The applicant shall prepare or amend the existing CC&Rs as needed to clarify how maintenance responsibilities will be shared between the newly created parcels and the remaining existing parcels of Parcel Map (SUBTPM19433)prior to approval of the Parcel Map. The Grading and Drainage Plan and the CC&Rs shall address shared access to Foothill Boulevard, private storm drains, surface drainage and maintenance of common areas, including landscaping within public rights-of-way and Best Management Practices identified in the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP). • WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN 1) A Storm Water Quality Management Plan shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. 2) The WQMP submitted with the application does not follow current WQMP templates/guidance and regulations set forth by the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control board (RWQCB). Access the following website for an updated San Bernardino County Water Quality Management Plan(WQMP)for New Development and Redevelopment Projects: http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/rwqcb8/html/sb womp html. 3) This site provides Guidance and Templates that can be filled out electronically and printed. Adhere to these guidelines and use the templates provided. Also, include the BMPs identified in the plan on the Grading Plans when submitted for plan check. 4) The Water Quality Management Plan(WQMP)prepared by Fitzmaurice Consulting-Civil Engineering, dated July 24, 2013, is deemed "Incomplete." The following comments are required to be completed prior to the issuance of a Building Permit: • Items D-F 72 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-43 DRC2013-00459 — FOUNTAIHEAD DEVELOPMENT October 23, 2013 Page 6 Section Page. Comments • This document shall be completed using the current adopted San Bernardino County model template for the Water Quality Management Plan. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF OCTOBER 2013. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Frances Howdyshell, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 23rd day of October 2013, by the following vote-to-wit: • AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Items D-F 73 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT#: DRC2013-00459 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT MODIFICATION APPLICANT: FOUNTAINHEAD DEVELOPMENT NORTHWEST CORNER OF ROCHESTER AVENUE AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD - LOCATION: APN: 0227-151-38. ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General Requirements Completion Date • 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. 13-43 and Standard Conditions shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 3. The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below. The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Manager hearing. a) Notice of Exemption-$50 X B. Time Limits 1. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. • 1 Items D-F 74 Project No. DRC2013-00459 Completion Date C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which _/_/_ • include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, the Development Code regulations, and the Terra Vista Community Plan. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager. 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Services Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance and final acceptance granted prior to occupancy. 4. Revised Site Plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Planning Manager review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for _ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 7. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Manager and Police Department(477-2800) prior to the issuance • of Building Permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 8. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, and the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to Planning Manager review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 9. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 10. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination and in conformance with Building and Safety Services Department standards, the Municipal Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department (RCFD) Standards. 11. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Manager and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits. D. SHOPPING CENTERS 1. 1 Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours. 2 • Items D-F 75 Project No, DRC2013-00459 Completion Date 2. The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and in no event shall • trash and debris remain for more than 24 hours. 3. Signs shall be conveniently posted for"no overnight parking". 4. All operations and businesses shall be conducted to comply with the following standards which shall be incorporated into the lease agreements for all tenants: a. Noise Level - All commercial activities shall not create any noise that would exceed an exterior noise level of 60 dB during the hours of 10 p.m. until 7 a.m. and 65 dB during the hours of 7 a.m. until 10 p.m. (Table 17 66.050-1) b. Loading and Unloading - No person shall cause the loading, unloading, opening, closing, or other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials, garbage cans, or other similar objects between the hours of 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. unless otherwise specified herein, in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to a residential area. 5. The lighting fixture design shall compliment the architectural program. It shall include the plaza area lighting fixtures, building lighting fixtures (exterior), and parking lot lighting fixtures. E. Building Design 1. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections shall be screened from all sides and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the • Planning Manager. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically more than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet, shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent nature with the building design and is detailed consistent with the building. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically less than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet shall be painted consistent with the color scheme of the building. Details shall be included in building plans. 2. For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main building colors. F. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 17 feet long with a required 1-foot overhang (e.g., over a curb stop). 2. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet. 3. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. G. Landscaping 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Manager review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development. 2. Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier • in accordance with the Development Code Section 17.80.050, and so noted on the grading 3 Items D-F 76 Project No. DRC2013-00459 Completion Date plans. The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans. The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and • trimming methods. 3. A minimum of 20 percent of trees planted within industrial projects, and a minimum of 30 percent within commercial and office projects, shall be specimen size trees - 24-inch box or larger. 4. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls. 5. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building. 6. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Manager review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Services Department, 7. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water efficient landscaping per Development Code Chapter 17.82. H. Signs 1. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with Uniform Sign Program #124 and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs. I. Building and Safety Industrial and Commercial Standard Conditions —/—/— • 1. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan; C. Floor Plan; d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan; e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and g. Planning Department Project Number (DRC2013-00459) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, two sets of energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance. 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. 4 • Items D-F 77 Project No. DRC2013-00459 Completion Date 5. Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by • the Building and Safety Services Department. 6. Developers wishing to participate in the Community Energy Efficiency Program (CEEP) can contact the Building and Safety Services Department staff for information and submittal requirements. Site Development 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be marked with the project file number (DRC2013-00459). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Services Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of Building Permits for a new residential project or major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees. The applicant shall provide a copy of the School Fees receipt to the Building and Safety Services Department prior to permit issuance. 3. Prior to issuance of permit issuance for a new residential project or major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, and Transportation Development Fee. 4. Prior to issuance of Building Permits for a new commercial or industrial development project • or major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees. The applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Services Department prior to permits issuance. 5. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tract/parcel map recordation and prior to issuance of Building Permits. 6. For projects using septic tank facilities, shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval prior to the issuance of Septic Tank Permits, and prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 7. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. 8. Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Department public counter). 9. All commercial/public/multi-family development swimming pool plans shall be submitted to the County of San Bernardino's Environmental Health Services Department for review and approval prior to approval from the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 10. The following is required for side yard use for increase in allowable area: a. Provide a reduced Site Plan (8 1/2-inches by 11 inches), which indicates the non- buildable easement. • 5 Items D-F 78 Project No. DRC2013-00459 Completion Date b. Recorded "Covenant and Agreement for the Maintenance of a Non-Buildable Easement,"which is signed by the appropriate property owner(s). New Structures . 1. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness. 2. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. 3. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's"high wind' instructions. 4. Plans for food preparation areas shall be approved by County of San Bernardino Environmental Health Services prior to issuance of Building Permits. 5. Provide draft stops in attic areas in accordance with CBC Section 1505. 6. Roofing materials shall be Class"A." 7. Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with CBC . 8. Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC. 9. Walls and floors separating dwelling units in the same building shall be in accordance with the CBC. 10. Provide smoke and heat venting in accordance with CBC. 11. Upon plan check submittal, additional requirements may be needed. _!_!_ • J. Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The grading and drainage plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual grading and drainage plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 3. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 4. A separate Grading and Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer. 5. If human remains are discovered on-site before or during grading, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98 and California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5. 6 • Items D-F 79 Project No. DRC2013-00459 Completion Date 6. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and —�—�— • place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit. 7. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a Grading Permit. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. 8. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage easements prior prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit. 9. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the latest adopted California Plumbing Plumbing Code. 10. The maximum parking stall gradient is 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per per the current adopted California Building Code. 11. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Building Code. 12. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) best management practices(BMP)devices. K. Water Quality Management Plan 1. A Storm Water Quality Management Plan shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official and and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit • 2. The Water Quality Management Plan shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. L. L. Commercial Fire Standard Conditions FSC -1 Public and Private Water Supply 1. Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants: Reference the RCFPD Standard 5-10. FSC-2 Fire Fire Flow 1. The required fire flow for this project is calculated gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of of 20 pounds per square inch. This requirement is made in accordance with California Fire Code Appendix, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances. The required minimum fire flow for this project may be reduced by 50 percent when automatic fire sprinklers are installed. 2. Public fire hydrants located within the immediate vicinity of the proposed project may be used to to provide the required fire flow subject to Fire District review and approval. Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow. 3. Fire protection water supply plans are required for all projects that must extend the existing water supply supply to or onto the site. Building Permits will not be issued until the fire protection water supply plans are approved. 4. On all Site Plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of —�—�— • the proposed project site. 7 Items D-F 80 Project No. DRC2013-00459 Completion Date FSC-3 Prerequisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems —/—/— Prior to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire sprinkler system, the applicant shall —/—/— • submit plans, specifications and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground supply piping. Approval of the underground supply piping system must be obtained prior to submitting the overhead fire sprinkler system plans. FSC4 Requirements for Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Automatic fire sprinklers shall be installed in buildings as required by the current editions of the —/—/— California Fire Code, the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance and/or any other applicable standards that require an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed. FSC-5 Fire Alarm System &Sprinkler Monitoring The current edition California Building/Fire Codes, the RCFPD Ordinance and Fire Alarm —/—/— Standard require most fire sprinkler systems to be monitored by a Central Station sprinkler monitoring system. A manual and or automatic fire alarm system may also be required based on the use and occupancy of the building. Plan check approval and a Building Permit are required prior to the installation of a fire alarm or a sprinkler monitoring system. Plans and specifications shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services in accordance with RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard. Refer to the specified documents for the system requirements. FSC-6 Fire District Site Access: Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private roads, drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes. Please reference the RCFPD Fire Department Access Roadways Standard. 1. Location of Access: All portions of the structures 1st story exterior wall shall be located —/—/— within 150-feet of Fire District vehicle access, measured on an approved route around the exterior of the building. Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates and • fences are deemed obstructions. 2. Specifications for private Fire District Access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are: —/—/— a. The minimum unobstructed width is 26 feet. b. The maximum inside turn radius shall be 24 feet. c. The minimum outside turn radius shall be 50 feet. d. The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 45 feet. e. The minimum vertical clearance is 14 feet, 6 inches. f. At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20 feet on each side. g. The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9 degrees or 20 percent. h. The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12 percent. I. Support a minimum load of 80,000 pounds gross vehicle weight(GVW). j. Trees and shrubs planted adjacent to the fire lane shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14-feet, 6-inches from the ground up. Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus. 3. Access Doorways Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be —/—/— provided as follows: a. In buildings without high-piled storage, access shall be provided in accordance with the current edition of California Building/Fire Codes and/or any other applicable standards. • 8 Items D-F 81 Project No. DRC2013-00459 completion Date • b. In buildings with high-piled storage access doors shall be provided in each 100 lineal feet or major fraction thereof, of the exterior wall that faces the required access roadways. When railways are installed provisions shall be made to maintain Fire District access to all required openings. 4. Access Walkways: Hardscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road road to all required building exterior openings. 5. Building Access: Knox boxes for site and building access are required in accordance with RCFPD Standard Standard 5-9. 6. Commercial/Industrial Gates: Any gate installed across a Fire Department access road shall be be in accordance with the Fire District Standard. The following design requirements apply: a. Prior to the fabrication and installation of the gates, plans are required to be submitted to Fire Construction Services (FCS) for approval. Upon the completion of the installation and before placing the gates in service, inspection and final acceptance must be requested from FCS. b. Gates must slide open horizontally or swing inward. c. Gates may be motorized or manual. d. When fully open, the minimum clearance dimension of drive access shall be 20 feet. e. Manual gates must be equipped with a RCFPD lock. The lock must be purchased at the Fire Administration Office. I. Motorized gates must open at the rate of one-foot per second. • g. The motorized gate actuation mechanism must be equipped with a manual override device and a fail-safe or battery backup feature to open the gate or release the locking Mechanism in case of power failure or mechanical malfunction. h. Motorized gates shall be equipped with a Knox override key switch. The switch must be installed outside the gate in a visible and unobstructed location. i. For motorized gates, a traffic loop device must be installed to allow exiting from the complex. j. If traffic pre-emption devices (TPD) are to be installed, the device, location and operation must be approved by the Fire Chief prior to installation. Bi-directional or multiple sensors may be required due to complexity of the various entry configurations. 7. Fire Lane Identification: Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes. A Site Plan illustrating the the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department for approval. 8. Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly —/—/— noted on the Site Plan. A copy of the approved Alternative Method application, if applicable, must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to B&S for plan review. 9. Roof Access: Must be in accordance with the RCFPD Roof Access Standard 5-6. There —/—/— shall be a means of Fire Department access from the exterior walls of the buildings onto the roofs of all commercial, industrial, and multi-family residential structures more than 10,000 square feet or with roof more than 15 feet in height and less than 75 feet above the level of the fire access road. a. This access must be reachable by the Fire Department aerial ladder. • 9 Items D-F 82 Project No. DRC2013-00459 Completion Date b. A minimum of one ladder point with a fixed ladder shall be provided in buildings with construction features, or high parapets that inhibit roof access. c. The number of ladder points may be required to be increased, depending on the • building size and configuration. d. Regardless of the parapet height or construction features the approved ladder point shall be identified in accordance to the roof access standard. e. Where the entire roof access is restricted by high parapet walls or other obstructions, a permanently mounted access ladder is required. f. Multiple access ladders may be required for larger buildings. g. Ladder construction must be in accordance with the RCFPD Roof Access Standard Appendix. In. A Site Plan showing the locations of the roof ladder shall be submitted during plan check. i. Ladder points shall face a fire access roadway(s). FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits —/—/— Listed are those Fire Code permits commonly associated with the business operations and/or building construction. Plan check submittal is required with the permit application for approval of the permit; field inspection is required prior to permit issuance. General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not specifically described below, which in the judgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property. • Candles and open flames in public assemblies • Compressed Gases • Dry Cleaning Plants • Explosive or Blasting Agents • • Repair Garages • Refrigeration Systems • Public Assembly • Tents, Canopies and/or Air Supported Structures • LPG or Gas Fuel Vehicles in Assembly Buildings FSC-12 Hazardous Materials – Submittal to Fire Construction Services. Plans shall be —/—/— submitted and approved prior to construction of buildings and/or the installation of equipment designed to store, use or dispense hazardous materials in accordance with the current editions of the California Building, Fire, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical Codes, RCFPD Ordinances and other implemented and/or adopted standards. FSC -13 Alternate Method Application - Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will review all requests for alternate method, when submitted. The request must be submitted on the Fire District "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the review fee. Map Recordation 1. Reciprocal Agreements for Fire Department Emergency Access and Water Supply are —/—/— required on this project. The project appears to be located on a property that is being subdivided. The reciprocal agreement is required to be recorded between property owners and the Fire District. The recorded agreement shall include a copy of the Site Plan. The Fire Construction Services shall approve the agreement, prior to recordation. The agreement shall be recorded with the County of San Bernardino, Recorder's Office. 10 • Items D-F 83 Project No. DRC2013-00459 Completion Date 2. Reciprocal Access Agreement — Please provide a permanent access agreement between • the owners granting irrevocable and a non-exclusive easement, favoring the Fire District to gain access to the subject property. The agreement shall include a statement that no obstruction, gate, fence, building or other structure shall be placed within the dedicated access, without Fire Department approval. The agreement shall have provisions for emergency situations and the assessing of cost recovery to the property by the Fire District. 3. Reciprocal Water Covenant — Please provide a permanent maintenance and service _/—/— covenant between the owners granting an irrevocable and non-exclusive easement, favoring the Fire District for the purpose of accessing and maintaining the private water mains, valves and fire hydrants (fire protection systems facilities In general). The covenant shall have provisions for emergency situations and the assessing of cost recovery to the property by the Fire District. FSC-15 Annexation of the parcel map: Annexation of the parcel map into the Community Facilities District#85-1 or#88-1 is required prior to the issuance of Grading or Building Permits. Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS - Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any Building Permits: 1. Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District. Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District Standards. Approval of the on-site (private) fire underground and water plans is required prior to any Building Permit issuance for any structure on the site. Private on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards, The Building and Safety Services Department and Fire Construction Services • will perform plan checks and inspections. All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. Fire construction Services will inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 2. Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CVWD. On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the project. Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard. All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. CVWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing. Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CVWD. Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 3. Construction Access: The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard. All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14'6"above the finished surface of the road. 4. Fire Flow: A current fire flow letter from CVWD must be received. The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CVWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services. 5. Easements and Reciprocal Agreements: All easements and agreements must be recorded with the County of San Bernardino. • 11 Items D-F 84 Project No. DRC2013-00459 Completion Date PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The building construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services' "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures." • PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION—Please complete the following: 1. Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers". On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location. 2. Private Fire Hydrants: For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on-site fire hydrants. The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for hiring the company to perform the test. A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available. The fire flow available must meet or exceed the required fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code. 3. Fire Sprinkler System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. 4. Fire Sprinkler Monitoring: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler monitoring system must be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. The fire sprinkler monitoring system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system (subject to the release of power). 5. Fire Suppression Systems and/or other special hazard protection systems shall be inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services before occupancy is granted and/or equipment is placed in service. • 6. Fire Alarm System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm system shall be installed, inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. 7. Access Control Gates: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards by Fire Construction Services. 8. Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services. The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways. 9. Address: Must be in accordance with the RCFPD Standard 5-7, 5-8 and/or 5-5. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commercial/industrial and multi-family buildings shall post the address in accordance to the appropriate RCFPD addressing Standard. 10. Hazardous Materials: The applicant must obtain inspection and acceptance by Fire Construction Services. 12 • Items D-F 85 Project No. DRC2013-00459 Completion Date 11. Confidential Business Occupancy Information: The applicant shall complete the Rancho —/—/— • Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form. This form provides contact information for Fire District use in the event of an emergency at the subject building or property. This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector. 12. Mapping Site Plan: Must be in accordance with the RCFPD Standard 5-11. Prior to the —/—/— issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a 8 1/2-inch by 11-inch or 11-inch by 17-inch Site Plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and building features as required in the standard. The Site Plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector. THE APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: M. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1. Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs or —/—/— by deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or prior to the issuance of Building Permits, where no map is involved. 2. Reciprocal parking agreements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint —/—/— maintenance of all common roads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by CC & R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to, or concurrent with, the final parcel map. N. Street Improvements 1. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a —/—/— source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, • regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. O. Utilities 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, —/—/— gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV(all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. —/—/- 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the —/—/— Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. • 13 Items D-F 86 Project No. DRC2013-00459 Completion Date 4. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. —/—/— Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received • from them. P. General Requirements and Approvals 1. Prior to the issuance of Building Permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative —/—/— fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50 percent of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department when the first Building Permit application is submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. • 14 • Items D-F 87 Project No. SUBTPM19433 Completion Date D. SHOPPING CENTERS 1. Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours. 2. The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and in no event shall trash and debris remain for more than 24 hours 3. Signs shall be conveniently posted for"no overnight parking". 4. All operations and businesses shall be conducted to comply with the following standards which shall be incorporated into the lease agreements for all tenants: a. Noise Level - All commercial activities shall not create any noise that would exceed an exterior noise level of 60 65 dB during the hours of 10 p.m. until 7 a.m and 65 70 dB during the hours of 7 a m. until 10 p.m (Table 17 66.058 1) b. Loading and Unloading - No person shall cause the loading, unloading, opening, closing, or other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials, garbage cans, or other similar objects between the hours of 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. unless otherwise specified herein, in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to a residential area. 5. The lighting fixture design shall compliment the architectural program. It shall include the plaza area lighting fixtures, building lighting fixtures (exterior), and parking lot lighting fixtures. E. Building Design 1. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections shall be screened from all sides and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically more than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet, shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent nature with the building design and is detailed consistent with the building. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically less than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet shall be painted consistent with the color scheme of the building. Details shall be included in building plans. 2. For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main building colors F. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 17 feet long with a required 1-foot overhang (e.g , over a curb stop) 2. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet 3. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. -J - F 3 'v 3 Project No. DRC2013-00458 Completion Date 2. The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and in no event shall trash and debris remain for more than 24 hours. 3. Signs shall be conveniently posted for"no overnight parking". _/_/_ 4. All operations and businesses shall be conducted to comply with the following standards which shall be incorporated into the lease agreements for all tenants: a. Noise Level - All commercial activities shall not create any noise that would exceed an exterior noise level of 69 65 dB during the hours of 10 p.m. until 7 a.m. and 65 70 dB during the hours of 7 a.m. until 10 p.m. (Table 17.66.050 1) b. Loading and Unloading - No person shall cause the loading, unloading, opening, closing, or other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials, garbage cans, or other similar objects between the hours of 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. unless otherwise specified herein, in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to a residential area. 5. The lighting fixture design shall compliment the architectural program. It shall include the plaza area lighting fixtures, building lighting fixtures (exterior), and parking lot lighting fixtures. E. Building Design 1. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections shall be screened from all sides and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically more than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet, shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent nature with the building design and is detailed consistent with the building. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically less than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet shall be painted consistent with the color scheme of the building. Details shall be included in building plans. 2. For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main building colors. F. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 17 feet long with a required 1-foot overhang (e.g., over a curb stop). 2. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet. 3. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. G. Landscaping 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Manager review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development. 2. Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in accordance with the Development Code Section 17.80.050, and so noted on the grading 3 D F S` Project No. DRC2013-00459 Completion Date 2. The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and in no event shall _ trash and debris remain for more than 24 hours. 3. Signs shall be conveniently posted for"no overnight parking". 4. All operations and businesses shall be conducted to comply with the following standards which shall be incorporated into the lease agreements for all tenants' a. Noise Level - All commercial activities shall not create any noise that would exceed an exterior noise level of 60 65 dB during the hours of 10 p.m. until 7 a.m. and 65 70 dB during the hours of 7 a m. until 10 p.m. X050 13 b. Loading and Unloading - No person shall cause the loading, unloading, opening, closing, or other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials, garbage cans, or other similar objects between the hours of 10 p.m. and 7 a m. unless otherwise specified herein, in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to a residential area. 5. The lighting fixture design shall compliment the architectural program. It shall include the plaza area lighting fixtures, building lighting fixtures (exterior), and parking lot lighting fixtures. E. Building Design 1. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections shall be screened from all sides and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically more than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet, shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent nature with the building design and is detailed consistent with the building. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically less than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet shall be painted consistent with the color scheme of the building Details shall be included in building plans. 2. For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main building colors. F. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 17 feet long with a required 1-foot overhang (e.g., over a curb stop). 2. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet. 3. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. G. Landscaping 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Manager review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development. 2. Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in accordance with the Development Code Section 17.80.050, and so noted on the grading 3 D - F `� NORM GCHQ Design Review uRINM, DRC2O13-00458, M . Conditional Use Permit Modification DRC2O13-004599 & Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19433 Applicant: Fountainhead Development Hearing Date: October 23, 2013 �i PNCHOProject Description 14 R VCAMQNGA ;AL IFORNIA Fountainhead Development is requesting to: • Subdivide property to create two parcels from one existing parcel (APN 0227-151 -38) • Develop a 4,994 square foot building on a 0.47-acre parcel • Amend Conditional Use Permit 95-11 to modify an existing master plan to allow for the proposed building i! IR �' I'� i 1�Plllllifll li IHIiIIi IIIH'il f . j161 �i V )IIII I11U �E Fl tl kll Ti r.tll lll1U lull N I1IIII IIIii frill 1 —'UI c 57 + _� i ,f !IfIHilHfflllliRl l h'I''kl�`.I�,i " r � ��ll °� t611F IIIIIIIY 1'11111' ,11111 t14k Y�.Lrk' �; .� 11 a o - I r.L c y i 19,_ i r NOR FMMM EuveHo Project Details UCAMONOA �AIHORNU • Site Characteristics: • Located at northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue. • Within the Community Commercial District of the Terra Vista Community Plan. • Subject parcel is 11 .18 acres in size. • The shopping center consists of various businesses including a fast food drive-thru restaurant, a sit-down restaurant, a gas station, a home improvement store, an auto service business as well as other auto and commercial retail stores. • Project Characteristics: • Subdivision of one existing parcel into two parcels: • Parcel 1 - 0.47 Acres • Parcel 2 - 10.71 Acres • Meets Municipal Code subdivision requirements • Categorically exempt from CEQA review under Section 15315 (Minor Land Divisions of four or fewer parcels). Tentative Parcel Map MIR aNCHO UCAMONGA TWTAT F PARCEL MAP� ALIFORN1A RAMONA TIRE/FIRESTONE Ar BI ft3m l t tw CQiCI ••— `v PK1C•_P I fel QI � IttTiifiifif✓Vi p v III 11 ❑❑ •II11111U11111`A PAM Pats s ._ PARCEL 2 -- eMa PARCEL 1 G2 MIRProject Details Cont. . . ANCu0 UC.AMONOA GLEFORNIA • Project Characteristics: • Development of a 4,994 square foot building, which includes: • Automotive Servicing Area • Tire Storage Room • Sales and Waiting Area • Architecture will match the established theme throughout the center. • Per Resolution No. 95-45 (Original Mater Site Plan), a Modification of Conditional Use Permit 95-11 is required for the building addition. • Sufficient parking will be provided. • Complies with Development Code and General Plan. • Categorically exempt from CEQA review under Section 15332 (In-Fill Development Projects). C■J V �i 11 (� � � ��. Proposed • • v l 7L WEST ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION w 1 Staff Recommendation 0 and Conclusion UCAMONGA CA IFOR-NIA ' Staff Recommends Approval of: *Design Review DRC2013-00458, *Conditional Use Permit Modification DRC2013-00459, and *Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19397 Subject to the Resolutions of Approval with Conditions �a Development Code Amendment DRC2013-00873 L Nature of Changes s • Reinstate omitted development standards • Clarify existing regulations i Incorporate required changes consistent with State law • " Fix it" changes ; no substantial revisions or new standards proposed i Proposed Changes Article Chapter Topic Change Proposed Reason III 17.30 Emergency Need to allow for Emergency shelters Consistency with State law; I Shelters "by right" in GC zone. unintentionally omitted from Development Code. 111 17.32 Definition Review the definition of "Service Consistency with prior definition Stations" to include convenience of gas/service stations stores. III 17.36 Industrial Revise front setback on the table to Error in transcription from old to Building Height max 70 feet, set max building height to new code 75 feet (or more with a CUP). III 17.36 Rail Standards Reincorporate Rail Service Standards. Unintentionally omitted from the old code III 17.36 Backup distance Reincorporate the language that Unintentionally omitted from the for vehicles requires 24 feet clearance from old code driveways for backup purposes. III 17.36 Equipment Reinstate development requirement Unintentionally omitted from the Screening that equipment screening to be old code architecturally compatible and integrated with the building design. i Proposed Changes Article Chapter Topic Change Proposed Reason IV 17.48 FenceMall Correct inconsistency between text Clarifying text to eliminate an Height and definition of Clear Visibility inconsistency Triangle for fence/wall/hedge height IV 17.48 Recreational Add development standards for Unintentionally omitted from Fencing recreational court fencing from the the old code old code. IV 17.56 Landscape Plan Clarification needed on when final Clarifying text to eliminate an Review Process landscape plans are required to be inconsistency submitted (after entitlement approval, not before). IV 17.58 Outdoor Lighting Clarify that this chapter applies to Clarifying text to eliminate an existing development, not just new inconsistency development. IV 17.58 Industrial Dock Reinstate development standards Unintentionally omitted from Lighting for wall mounted industrial dock the old code lighting i Proposed Changes P� *� Article Chapter Topic Change Proposed Reason IV 17.64 Parking stall Inconsistency between the text and Clarifying text to eliminate an length table for minimum parking stall inconsistency length dimension IV 17.64 Parking Reinstate the language that Unintentionally omitted from ! exempts restrooms, hallways, the old code stairwells, etc. from parking calculations I IV 17.64 Double striping Add typical standards for double Unintentionally omitted from striping of parking spaces from the the old code old code 1 , Environmental Review • General Plan Program EIR prepared in 2010 ' No new or increased significant effects not previously considered Addendum to the General Plan EIR is the appropriate level of environmental review Recommendation to City Council • Resolution No . 13-50 — Adopt an addendum to the General Plan Program Environmental Impact Report j — Recommend approval of Development Code Amendment DRC2013-00873 • STAFF REPORT PIANMNG DEPARrMENT Date: October 23, 2013 RANCHO To: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission C,,UCAMONGA From: Candyce Burnett, Planning Manager By: Mike Smith, Associate Planner Subject: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2012-01202 - LENNAR HOMES OF CALIFORNIA - A review of 291 single-family homes that will be constructed in conjunction with a proposed subdivision of a parcel of about 3,047,614 square feet (79.67 acres) within the Low Medium (LM) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan (South Overlay), located about 525 feet east of Etiwanda Avenue at the north side of Arrow Route - APN: 0229-041-09. Related files: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18870 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00483. On July 10, 2013, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was adopted by the Planning Commission for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18870. Per Section 15162, no further environmental review is required for subsequent projects or minor revisions to projects within the scope of a previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Development Review DRC2012-01202 by adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with conditions. • PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Multi-Family Apartment Complex; Medium (M) Residential District, Foothill Boulevard Overlay Zoning District (Subarea 4) South - Varies; General Industrial (GI) District East - Etiwanda/San Sevaine Flood Control Channel; Floodway (FW) (unincorporated San Bernardino County) West - Single-Family Residences/Multi-Family Apartment Complex; Low (L), Low Medium (LM), and Medium (M) Residential Districts, Etiwanda Specific Plan (South Overlay) B. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Low Medium Residential and Flood Control/Utility Corridor North - Low Medium South - General Industrial East - n/a (unincorporated San Bernardino County) West - Low, Low Medium, and Medium C. Site Characteristics: The project site is a vacant parcel located approximately 525 feet east of Etiwanda Avenue at the north side of Arrow Route (Exhibit B). A subdivision of the parcel into 291 lots was approved by the Planning Commission on July 10, 2013 (Related file: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18870; Exhibits E and K). The project site is an irregularly-shaped vacant parcel with an overall area of approximately 3.5 million square feet (80.8 acres). The site is approximately 1,900 feet deep (north to south); because of its irregular shape, it is approximately 1,300 feet wide • (east to west) at the north property line and approximately 2,100 feet wide at the south property Item G 1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2012-01202—LENNAR HOMES OF CALIFORNIA October 23, 2013 Page 2 • line. There is a "dog leg" extension that is approximately 232 feet in width and 688 feet in length at the northwest corner of the property that extends to Foothill Boulevard. The project site was previously used by Ameron, a concrete pipe manufacturer located nearby at the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Arrow Route, for outdoor storage (of, for example, finished pipe segments). To the west of the project site are the Victoria Woods apartment complex and a single- family residential subdivision. To the north is the San Sevaine Villas apartment complex. Immediately to the east, and parallel to the east property line of the project site, is the Etiwanda/San Sevaine flood control channel. To the south are legal, non-conforming single-family residences, industrial uses (principally outdoor storage), and several vacant parcels. The principal street frontage will be along Arrow Route with a length of approximately 2,100 feet. The secondary street frontage will be along Foothill Boulevard with a length of approximately 232 feet (at the north end of the aforementioned "dog leg"). Within the project site, is a corridor comprised of easements in favor of Southern California Edison (SCE) and Southern California Gas Company (SCGC), and associated improvements such as transmission lines. This corridor is located parallel to the west property line of the project site and is approximately 22 acres in area. The "dog leg" portion of the property is entirely within this corridor. Because of the presence of this utility corridor, the actual area of the project site that is available for development is approximately 64 acres. The zoning of the majority of the site is Low Medium (LM) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan (South Overlay); the portion of the site that is within the utility corridor described above is zoned Open Space (OS) District. The zoning of the properties to the west beyond the utility corridor are Low (L), Low Medium (LM), and Medium (M) Residential Districts, Etiwanda Specific Plan (South Overlay). The zoning of the property to the north is Medium (M) Residential District, Foothill Boulevard Overlay Zoning District (Subarea 4). The zoning of the properties to the south is • General Industrial (GI) District. The zoning of the flood control channel to the east is Floodway (FW) (unincorporated San Bernardino County). The subject property is generally level with an elevation at the north and south sides of approximately 1,180 feet and 1,155 feet, respectively. ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant proposes to construct a single-family residence on each lot of the previously approved subdivision for a total of 291 single-family residences. Seventy-three (73) of the houses will be single-story, while the houses on the remainder of the lots will be two-story. This equates to 25 percent of the lots having single-story houses. This mix of one- and two-story homes is consistent with the policy adopted by the Planning Commission requiring that 25 percent (minimum) of the proposed houses be single-story. The project will comply with Section 5.42.606 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan which requires that 50 percent of the garages to be oriented or situated in a manner that minimizes the visual presence of the garage. The houses on all corner lots will be single-story as required per Section 5.42.608 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The applicant proposes nine (9) types of architectural themes (elevations) —Santa Barbara Revival, Bungalow, Ranch, Country, Monterey, Spanish, Prairie, European, and Italian. The applicant proposes thirteen (13) distinct footprints — Plans 55 (1 - 4), 65 (1 - 4), and 70 (1 - 5) — and reverse footprints of each for a total of twenty-six (26) footprints. Plans 55-1, 65-1, 70-1, and 70-2 will be single-story, while the others will be two-story. The number of available footprints will comply with Figure 545 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The architecture of each home will be consistent with Section 17.120.030(A)(1)(a) of the Development Code which specifies that architectural treatment shall be provided on all elevations, • i.e. 360-degree architecture. Each house will have a prominent, well-defined front entrance and a Item G 2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2012-01202—LENNAR HOMES OF CALIFORNIA October 23, 2013 • Page 3 covered porch area. Decorative veneers, such as stone or brick, and/or wood siding will be present on the front and rear elevations. The architectural theme that is primarily represented by the front elevation of each house will be continued on the other elevations through the use of matching colors, materials, and finishes. Depending on the plans/themes, on all elevations there will be details such as wood brackets or corbels beneath roof overhangs and wall projections; molding around windows and doors; window shutters; wrought iron accent features; and pot shelves. Consistent with Section 17.120.030(A)(2) of the Development Code, the rear elevations of each house will have articulation of the building plane and vertical variation of the roofline. Depending on the plans/themes at the side and rear elevations, the wall planes will be articulated with projections — either a second floor pop-out or a full height projection of the first and second floors that minimize the expansiveness of the blank walls. Texture and shadow patterns through the use of recessed windows will be provided on some elevation surfaces, as well. B. Neighborhood Meeting: A neighborhood meeting for both Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18870 and this application was conducted to gather input and comments from the owners of the surrounding properties within 660 feet of the project site. This meeting was held at Perdew Elementary School at 13051 Miller Avenue on April 29, 2013. No objections to the project were presented by those who attended. As only the architecture was revised in response to revisions requested by the Design Review Committee (on April 30, 2013 - Exhibit H and discussed below), it was determined that a second neighborhood meeting for this application was not necessary. C. Grading and Technical Review Committees: The Grading Review Committee (Addington and • Miller) and Technical Review Committee reviewed both Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18870 and this application on May 30, 2013. All of the grading and technical aspects of the overall project were analyzed at that time. The Committees accepted the proposal and recommended approval. As only the architecture was revised in response to revisions requested by the Design Review Committee (on April 30, 2013 - Exhibit H and discussed below), it was determined that a second set of meetings for review by the Grading and Technical Review Committees for this application was not necessary. D. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee (Fletcher, Oaxaca, and Granger) reviewed the application on April 30, 2013 (Exhibit H). The Committee reviewed the subdivision layout, private open space/landscaping design, and architecture of the homes. The Committee accepted the subdivision layout and private open space/landscaping as proposed and recommended approval. However, the architecture was generally considered to be unacceptable. The Committee directed the applicant to extensively revise the architecture of the houses. The applicant subsequently revised the architecture and submitted the proposal for a follow-up review by the Committee at a meeting held on August 20, 2013 (Exhibit 1). The Committee reviewed the revised architecture and recommended approval subject to the applicant completing some minor changes. In the interim period since then, the applicant submitted revised plans, and staff verified that they are consistent with the Committee's direction. The Committee's conditions have been incorporated into the Resolution of Approval. E. Trails Advisory Committee: The Trails Advisory Committee reviewed both Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18870 and this application on May 8, 2013 (Exhibit J). All of the design and technical aspects of the trail were analyzed at that time. The Committee accepted the proposal and recommended approval. As only the architecture was revised in response to revisions requested • by the Design Review Committee (on April 30, 2013 - Exhibit H), a second meeting for review by this committee of this application was determined to be not necessary. Item G 3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2012-01202—LENNAR HOMES OF CALIFORNIA October 23, 2013 Page 4 • F. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration on July 10, 2013, in connection with the City's approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18870. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project. No substantial changes are proposed to the project that indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment; no substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicates new or more severe environmental impacts; no new important information shows the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered; and no additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts. There have been no substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previous Negative Declaration. Staff further finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Negative Declaration, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less-than-significant. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. No correspondence has been received. Respectful] submitted, Candyce B nett Planning Manager CB:MS/ge Attachments: Exhibit A - Location Map Exhibit B - Aerial Photo Exhibit C - Site Utilization Map Exhibit D - Site Plan Exhibit E - Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18870 (for reference only) Exhibit F - Conceptual Grading Plan and Sections (for reference only) Exhibit G - Floor Plans and Elevations Exhibit H - Design Review Committee Action Comments (April 30, 2013) Exhibit I - Design Review Committee Action Comments (August 20, 2013) Exhibit J - Trails Advisory Committee Action Comments (May 8, 2013) (without exhibits) Exhibit K - Staff Report (without exhibits) and Resolution of Approval No. 13-26 for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18870 Draft Resolution of Approval for Development Review DRC2012-01202 • Item G 4 jV Lima— MP f r — LI W, E ab AM— vw�- A UTIWANDA" : BLVD NNW. PROJECT SITE FONTANA 4a'-2 FOCrrMLL BLVD n. EXHIBIT A Item G 5 t71 �. •_�`�__ _ .`4{'� �� a. • �� _�� .� ,'lit A� �,.5;'�'S,� - ' x c. '•tl �+r '� v v>y C i 7 7 rt�ti •.. � � �` w r�uv �•F�� E, , G `�l o A CC;COW Nwni.i . .• 117 N(.C4Nt A-+�7Y i• _MMM +»,.•fff _ - .; 1�. ��"._. �'•.�� { '• %•t�r�•n �'�H;.,F�� p �`'?�y,Y.1+•i #Ss-Tt[ [D.1Es, x"•i��i' �i i� R ..•.`o At fD UP tit girl t' '{'fit.' ir`rri�AlV I` 777 ?? :.,.'T1 +k.�t�` Cl 'd da i i76> h '��t�•"' i } :+ t!� Ky i Y:'1+��) :4�+,• �'T ` . •}. s �a s i H/CNORYmw .... �.,�..�w.r�. ♦ , t�`� .1.�. iF�� `T .� ;. -•e,:.>.:ra:.r..,s. s�..: :t;-.•.cv.:.=.-,:y.'.�fi-+c �_n.,,::xar�.•�-x.,..•-�'�'_ � - ' ,-. g-•x- �� N :7^'' R'W� .,^7. ^'�"�,.c"yt)-rli::: ':".^..:. :�t1,��..••y�''-�.�••t....,�_• .r;t+:__C, a .t t`,� �i w a.`.! 1 ,11110 w _ fJ � .�mws�c pit 114",�r � yti0. .• e = XF/'tr\xLrM ' � r' Irt yP �� / Y ,x 1 �• I Peen,.�p$r ✓ � 9 ' � Y��'Z• �i'�, r :r ,# +.�R.'R,tr� •�$ki'At$W7 vow. r' ,tix,,. 1 h ��•11t r-.>` .l;1 9ph'` �. r` 7' [ '`'?;'b' rj�'�.,fP�¢ at �, `'!I+�M'�f t♦ 'F ='it �" }a ' k•L' : i ,• �L7[r r r> �~'` �•R ti It .:xr,► lx�l �Pf ? r 1�. Tl��►"� �.x .�„� .�l\ }•. �• � i Xie ��+. 1 / ;Y 'lC ti61��, '4•�/`$ '�� t �L 1 �1 �, I}/+.�-i'rI �11� •tom` 1�•. p t � 1 .t �G: Ito �c 11 tJ{'.- ..;,ti1�►644 J. �,Y I, R .. jl ..�'� e r'P ',+.•.a. IW ,It7� r'i4}C7'. 1 ^lit .� i:. t�.' ' � IT"iw:L' �I �YIALS r ,(^'3 fir,..•i r:— ry .. ! I^t• 1! � '' '�d� r . ma I ✓;, 4 tYl RSn��` �. ; .1 < r a.�t' ; La �,r Y#4"`'1N r��i=3 tid • r vrr- L r I �iQ"�} yl}-�r�li(r lay 4 �� liV•L � �6- ..• r -�[ �14'' LJL'J'-' M x4xg t�< , �✓ Yf 1'1+ � aav� �.,..�A •tea �.�. •six �.+_�vrss��wap�,� ♦ Ft '� yIr4 ,WCLr/i�[- ' j .r• -.zr.l1/ --W3M y - ,,•�yy sn Nx% , w3..:� I� `R �' �i`,,.,�:� �-•ii��-- 1111100@00000@0000@0@00@0@00 @@0111@I@@@@@@@I0@@@9@@@@9 Illifll@8@@@B8@0@0B@0@@@@@0@@@@0110000000880@0@000@@809 • 8' 1 - �,�7'i� /'�//,, i�t��.slI'l� IiL�,�I�irlr �isl6 ��>r�kii�i�iik�lil■N. r��' j �''I �i�`-�i1�.� nNJ �� '� ` �pplt ut' I ��l 4.:11:r�H,i OEM. Imi,rig WAR �`'�►!.�►'yils'�rii'.��y�:rI'��lt).;i i(IIWyy�l�'LMt1��e\\t�.'�::'.1''1l��•�4Rti��iI��eIa�ti �rt� �hnl�rls�TlIi� t:M1 .�MA Rwaia,a) � � I ',�I/II'�I�r1s■�,[1a-r,IM"jr'tR-7RRs ,- ' l 1 . 1, /.; ib URM �•� , �r►� -- -------- '----- •--- -- -°- - -- -__ '�`�11 �'�� ;'- '+qls<-'�'•_�=�Ip!'�w��—iy�f!��"�l r'-�; dao■-=- � i-�� 'J a t i..� t t• .: _. a I M .r t� a ■ t a�- i OA inal pjkF4I ..lit. rrrt�ilfl?_■�rr�' �•.i�l�_■!_4=df�r�lryll� ��i ik M1k Ural II �Li'� �Z 1 iia k1_1 111 uwm Ilia �15,EWPI MU I IMF id"M .03 M 110M //Limililg deem `„�!�" ��I�n/ks71�n1`t!1►��n1�nI�7�•I�It��,J i:� all 01 POP.oK NIN AIA ' m It7 nl'_ �et� 'R' `a 1 'li N� �' %l�ti��i• �_11�nrd�t11�1:fir. rin�WnN1.J�t Sr�J ' ` 0 US W1 MW A ® I alitWHO i 01 9 wail [ 311131HX3 tl,v ! , oil All AL AL �t ( t i+ Iq '! 711 1 [ I 11111itrt oil I t'all(l 1�III Ili I y!! r/----wlu loll III i011 ll tl �l'.'1 ... . . . . .,a . a. . . .. :a_., ..- '.lj N�li� iljf!� i�� I� 511, F Will!1111 1,*%!111111111illiillllllllalili Ici ''� d§��t •pt��l� i'1 it I.p� ! �Ft •;:[t• et {te[f ete Se[e [e[{I _ laa, [,a,[aa,aa as aa[aa •[ at ` ,t 1 11 11 ill 1111 1 1 11 111il11 1 11111111. 1111 � iiiii c F ;tG:Gt e[ee R •{ •'tSF SC: FeF {G: f• i al,14141 IlimiliHII'll; 'i isil jililf laai' _ - ii li 1111114� a 1.1111 I fitit1111111111t1t1111 11115 I llta ilii tl hili 11 i fi 1114 Ilii iil2 tit lir t 1`1 illFt CF ee tial lila 1 3171 1'tlllillllllllllliiilllii ! ) ec F F mc [ CCF [Fat fte GCCF[ctl J ti'111,01111,11,1111 I PI it 1tlilt G 3 11 111111IMI la Ilii le al ieillli al ill:•1i 1 1111111x111 t•e cF a ss{c. c• eFce.:•e[::Fc •F eecF c[: <ee i `111 lilts It i]1] 31111111111111 2 QIoff 1 I91a9 tliiallilai ilia lllilllilllii iii • t :;c•eeee[eet ee{;c::F cc t•[t a e[[tt a Icc O f L E N N A R TENTATIVE TRACT YAP 7171E SHEET Ab es CORNERSTONE •TRACT 14070 DRC2012.01202 leen , or L 1 9 wall ETIWANDA AVE , COA , I I ,I•c ��I ill I 'rl I � � 5 �,1•`. ,.,\��.��_ o o y., ..�, ,.\ �,T� \LTJ; i V � I III L — 1s�cr.c2 pwl '1 Ji�tT 7�"ii -G,�" I. .!i ',na'ri r' .N a ',li '+i 1i,� ss i I new yrr.�nF; t �a�tl cq:;, 5: :c , a. :o: �"q°•y7•->q., ' �I;, . . ,fl d 'rg �{ F �'� i'iF �� t;�f�- .;t : � �� { � �1}} !' rF FF "� � l�R ��• 'xet.,. f 5 i 5 5 71 �i ��.5' ;ie i. .i fi ti ��9 S , 5 5i� 5� �� i 1 3 '• 5A5i'` �� 5 {i3�1':r b1311f > vplI IL q5 4 _ V 15 11 I•i•5 li1 Sq�xiI3j1L1 DiI [11iy5'JI>IC1�C5uIA will 41 ^ li I I 4a i',yI1Ci i 't .l ii' M1 I It G II{@� i.�l `r-�. a�+L''C Li`YE';I'• '7+ ", . t'I, iu `-.` r4T `;i '-2-, It. I� •,45�''t�`.->. {, 'i• i .. • '•'dS 1-Y 0`W••µ; .I•(�'yv d i e . � :Y vypn Ike �.>.{•s•�.a. Il '155'1 � 1 . 71 ti5. Y5511.11�1!.Ill t11l.�.11.r.laliC7.t1YC�lLL •tl�•.5'1•li t.:Il..i yl:,lli.l�L� ' SY '' J` ii � 't''• 51Y, ff f a •l•u 1 4 (1• ,,,N , .k• • i r , , .. >f> ., u' S ,i "v 'i•� i �1,� • �+ 1..1.,'t:� i.�:$`7s S✓,' •� F4 i SfLfRC1R {f4 :... . •r .,�9�.....4.. . r,{r iiR3Cy T �q 3t { '• H:.�vua%��;ni , vY9+1 � g �'. 1"�iy• �•, 3 I ;�;.. •.•'�-,t.- Y,;;l�,L1�J4 L'rliLS'�.:�•L:':L�I'1.��. 1'� -i �I' , .•1��LL:-.111'C-�i�� I ii j5r`C�i.ii•� •: •f ti.!.0 C.. %C.iC,'J �Y�::,:. '{Cid:CC,iC:•°yiC�V'Y�S`Ri�..pC�4:ICS,C:, CtC: •1 -arca'_ L E N N A R TENTATIVE TRACT MAP INDEX SHEET CORNERSTONE -TRACT 18070 DRC2012-01202 roan 1 0• • �c �• •,! � MATCH LINE SEE SHEET ♦ OF ♦ r •' Lo 0 / '"; r-—-- -- ——- -—"—r--fes•"'-——- - -- �-�"--� _ ,s � . ;i � Vic, 2 '- � - � -�' �� "; • 'm.-��-�,�-��-�a ,��-�t—� m, I: INC A ! - " t L E N N A R TENTATIVE TRACT MAR 90UTMERLT PORTION = CORNERSTONE-TRACT 10070 DRC2012-01202 ♦MEET ♦ or .�j / �, / ' 7 i J- f.r k;.. i� Y• A(V. ' � %� � "` - •�- - - - - - '"-, -tea -- ----?;-- -- - ,, � - 3 ' i zi MATCH LINE SEE SHEET S OF . L E N N A R TENTATIVE TRACT YAP NORTHERLY PORTION CORNERSTONE-TRACT I8970 ORC2012-01202 •.a•r . of � r r� 7 Liu 1H f X Ali -+f rI yp • i� if�F.f iJ� • l..�S.�J�� s` -�.(�pf��.;ti f'.r( � I � j��tlt� ■'�"`��(r��1't til �I ++ L IIIIi �i . i if�r• � y:t11 .�I. J� /y. ° � '. 'r't 7 :�` :a f ,�r�i.a• mw� ' -Z22�LLLLL----t. M, Nr IF �•ia rf, 1 �-1 •� J � ..f � -a •.2 L 9= L� .,!n"" 1�JS� ' rf y.gyw�i} o�.A� Z� Y i�aJ .r r`• � /�:..Jl -. r ri ; --..�? � S 7 '. Nt �. l rr t M Ml t• �1..�' �' ''il I'!� 'J7iy i�� 11 c�ru�.l�u�A�, .e i... I�+,�•� pl �J�1 �►= •�lJ�•''�/�� ' Biu.r,a'�ir��i��i��3�',��,.�e�;�. it i lu n • •.[ ' inr�J ir.. awl:• �� Hia 1� +O! iRL r.""1M'�� N' ��1 •� ,,. �T�_�n-.rrsr��r.�.��wr•.r�wa�o !ate wl v r.- — Orrly �k ^ �t� {f r , SII ' r L•'r►-.-R- A " 1 t.+ � . I tib•*:- �.i i ht4� IIl�i ;'r; Sr { I, { V. I�rt't'.� . : '� a� /'•� 'aid, ri ► ��M+jlr € . .�+'"'w1 ,1 3� a, IN 471 �r 3a t i t i�is7�'31r CIO 'li. l 1 i!E"'rLL jjQ- ��1t--,. i" ILII ' _ Iv\ w F9 AM pi M�Olga �•yeta testi 95 v! p -_�� t �•r t i �,F,t I ,ice.lN,I,t �'�� 'I Iuitt;�f~'"� t{; I�i Iliil,"''Iy IuI j, �.Mq MOT 15. i '- '� _ _ Il�el!1 J`I,14 lid '�i� F+ MIIiRkI F�WAS�R.,,�.`� iy �y`�i~ �� I �;�■�� y�j , r�, '�I.ae, ►� ��,,��, 7 r;;�,l �i'Y'�� '��i 1�,�'^*ti � , ;ICS �'�, ), .SIN � � t� I 1 , � l 1 LT1»-+ � � l•-rat l ,� � s� it 1 r +jn •i/- r. . .1 It LL YL .0 �t 8'Ir L ,� I. �• irr �/ �4rt l- ,i��h� �INOT-w-PN�f .r. A , yYr1F"•[ 1j v - _ 7 i `dT• yam" '� r � /'� Q ,./t //, -'r'(b •d� o 3 µ9` i /~r `��/ � ,/ ~' �!`• r ' ' '/l' �� `�j, '/- `ter -" "�' � i• 5' .�1 7` _ �I • 1 � MATCH LINE SEE SWEET 0 wnrc.rw�rwi r L E N N A R CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN g CORNERSTONE TRACT 16670 OR06016-01606 iyT ��` ' i ..,,��-�.��wr �.- .a.�w r.-_rte 1p�,■�� ■-�_ ''I�� yMioW g ' �� h aIh ' I'ITM`! �� `� N NP 11 Lam up _ _- - ------- i li■ _ ilk } T J �i� •� T , �.il � a�.ai � Il li Iq 'I dry1.. ION] -I� "711F," •. �I�.hilf,�j'cL�-r',I� ,{'91• 'JNI — Ji� ' 111I •1 IM ■ �'-:-� ` _ M *cT pFMC,NM. gm •,_ M — cl Vr � � I i � I I SECTION A - A L E N N A R CONCEPTUAL GRADING PTAH - CROSS SECTIONS ��= CORNERSTONE TRACT 181310 DRC2012-01202 8.991 a Or I• 4,1 .7'77A am SECTION B - B L E N N A R CONCEPTUAL ORAOINO PLAN CROSS SECTIONS CORNERSTONE-TRACT 1111170 ORC2012-01202 MEET 10 or .. I 'T fT T r i = -1 - ; � �.�._.f- .r _.__- SECTON K VN SIM7 nW.^ SICTION, W STREET TYPCx Moo nw-4L 11C m SWTJON , 1111114111 L E N N A R CONCEPTUAL ORAWING PLAN - CROSS SECTIONS CORNERSTONE -TRACT 10070 DIFIC2012-011202 IH99T It Of 14 Boil I , l � I I I _ — m 3 .� �I'` r- -res �_• s-T-_ ��s > ♦�e� L E N N A R CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN - CROSS SECTIONS ( Jr' CORNERSTONE-TRACT 18570 DRC2012-01202 9.617 .7 Or .. SZ D wall J IISIHXP p p P o 8 • f qE s F s a ss s s to KEVIN L.CROOK PLAN 55.1 ARCHITECT - L E N N A RLANDMARK AT CORNERSTONE .:V r, mc.-I u u x JI. > ----------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------- - ------------- -------- - --------- ------ - LEFT ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION SNF z eb0 SMCvI cc Z 0' 0 U ROOF PLAN ROOFPITCH:5:12 cc Z < ------- -- -- ----- - ------------------------ ------- M < < Emil- A Z Z Z :5 w RIGHT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION IL � SANTA BARBARA REVIVAL 55-1.2 u- r ux zy< y WY WY WY v T4�, ai`- ------------------------------- --------------- --- i------ - - - Y]} LEFT ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION tua un aaMrewui wrEs ]ur ma 11mF Caowa WlY Ned RCa 0.1] 4.a li Meas 11' Wgawga te'-tva W aW Sam.lfrap pva Z O saM.rw rwMov cao V W Z ce LZ ' Q U ROOFPLAN ~ Q ROOF PITCH:5:12 Y K Q F Z Q } J .. ffM . . 11Ti m n Z1 Z ` RIGHT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION d J BUNGALOW 55-1.3 gau! •+4 ! A J 4. / IALM w'f O 3�A=V J•y • C I E LEFT ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION fl � vrurz a.xePw wmEs Puttu � war coca.w n 9.it IIx EPaw nr Paa�T W �1a nit ASa IYo15bvY1 fiP OSP Z m s,®Ea.e O 9Yia w�a Pauli CY EP®fawPe Pas lin Pl OOPi E`Ma�P N ap W Z ccO U F ROOF PLAN Q ROOF PITCH:6.12 Y Q E O Z Q J [C 0&jwgAN Z _ -- Z Z W RIGHT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION d J COUNTRY 55-IA Flultl:U m-iuu 4' to M10. ......... --------- -- . LEFT ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION Z 0 cl tirttan ata D.ir it 4 M r tar r4 pr j z 0 u ROOF PLAN ROOF PITCH:5:17 ............... Z -------------- - ----- - ---- Z Z RIGHT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION RANCH 55-1.5 w � 0 m_ t at B xtl � � o ; mill Irli Kw YYw,Ybtlw � Yd Lv rf A 3 BEDROOM 5 — " 1 ' O OPTION s N T K� O ___- W Z ( I ____ _ Iv _m m O u I tiV 1 7 Y J E SECOND FLOOR PLAN FIRST FLOOR PLAN p ..,a ... . ,< Z First Floor: 1,042 sq. ft. r`+ Second Floor: 1,287 sq. ft. Total Living Area: 2,329 sq. ft. ^ °� Garage: 424 sq. ft. Z Z Q Z J W O_ J 55-2.1 LE D wall E� i A > I i O t� z 1 1 Z 1 I I F • I I I I I � 1 ,Ir V, I� D I I li 1�-EL 8 1 L LsT _ O I DUZ11 cc re D • W D X Y� D m s`titt < 1 1 _ m im > I i H Q I H Z I Q I Z I 1 1 I I I� 1 • 1 li V7 V1 N Mark Gross & Associates. Inc.PLAN 5 5 - 2 A CASE NUMBER (SUM s DRC2012-012021 .. w .II wn n.� r.Iwl n-we N LENNAR - LANDMARK AT CORNERSTONE Z£ E) wall ;T 1 Fn � zz I O Z El I I I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 I 5 A-jp, ,, EW C • D OG C I - I 1 1 I E1 1 II fj 1 IP � fill IClif f€if Hill $ z jy■ilst A i If ! i Let I • 1� I i5 V1 Mark Gross & Associates, Inc. N PLAN 5 S - 2B CASE NUMBERS I SUMI$8206 DRC2012-012021 MI .:I SII w LENNAR - LANDMARK AT CORNERSTONE - " " uu NO I' o. ��• ilii I•� Ilr: Iii. ��n = nu i ' n=i ..y .H�\ �� •Biu �� __ ■��u : loo uo - EE D wall uo — ool .... ,;��._ L.0 •�a-e_9 �� _ Ln Ln Mark Gross Associates. Inc. PLAN 55 - 2C CASE NUMBERS (SU1FrT18$70&DRC2012-01202 :4. LENNAR - LANDMARK AT CORNERSTONE \1: u I/ VE D wall oi •�_� -117 [fill _I ssij�.,�1'• jz • ii liir��nrcaa �s?C=? I� wo Mark Gross Associates, Inc. PLAN 55 - 21D CASENUMARS (SUM13870ADRC2012-01202) LENNAR - LANDMARK AT CORNERSTONE Iwo � ■�.i, '•:Ioo }h . \�.: S£ D wall • 0 o O ' w.nr w+ir w.ur FO Y € 9 E _ o 0 E � "i a� z 6 z v'� • e5 F :G 66 6 65� as a r y, KEVIN L.CROOKJ6 u PLAN 55.3 �� ARCHITECT »�' '° INC. - — L E N N A RLANDMARK AT CORNERSTONE � 8FFE{ USS 1 in ry t � @ n; 9 LEFT ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION I t� WiF111IL M1F8 _ xmrwe.art 4Yly rYya aa'a W YrrY]�nl Cr40m. ,y r ra l�tir Z ro amrar O 3 a®<..rev�.rrw � W 0 U ROOF PLAN H ROOF PITCH:5:12 Q Y mum aC Q i Z Q cc J ®® ..... ............ ___-___ r0 _ Z ..... .. ... ... .. ..�___ _______ ' Z - z Z W RIGHT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION g J SANTA BARBARA REVIVAL 55-3.2 •..111\!1111.11111\11. w - - LEFT ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION ROOFPLAN ROOF PITCH:4:12 .III��III.IIII.IIII.nI.- _ �i�5.":��:•:i5si.:i.i'r�''�:�ei't"' � �:::'I I•III'iii '—..II =iii ?I ,. 1ac ..I��, �� ■ ■i ice■ - - - RIGHT • ELEVATION IIIA I I _ iiL ii ••• •• LEFT ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION ��. 00 cr ROOF PLA? 0 ROOF PITCH:6:12 u Aa ::.,.;. I T .. .. Iil.... ..a. II .----nrl--- 1L �� RIGHT ELEVATiON REAR ELEVATION .. ............................ ... ------------------------ LEFT ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION . _ . . 10 wu ROOFPLAN I I : i I _ I i i I : •ss-zss z: � ::�:: I!r ELEVATIONRIGHT ELEVATION u m 0 0 m t m- a� p 0t, 4 orq O r � i wTf 1 0 f i I I 777 1 Z eD T r1 o O LI penis 4: Yi - - F p� • iiy e y n 1n A g K O m Z m K . , p.R. ® O i Y, Y J � Q at u F SECOND FLOOR PLAN FIRST FLOOR PLAN Z First Floor: 1.171 sq. h. v Second Floor: 1,509 sq. h. Ln Total Living Area: 2.680 sq. h. p^ at Garage: 421 sq. h. Z Q Z Q Z J W d J 55-4.1 • == i_i: '= == St _� 4 4 - } sea I� .. :�C�: • ____ __ •I�I� •61 _ ICC) ED Mark Gross & Associates, Inc. PLAN 55 - 4A C�ENUMBEkS (SUMI$970&DRC2012-01202� ml�. 4 \�:�': • 11 FT-1 ni ■ • ° • iii: _- — H {M e Mark Gross & Associates, Inc. PLAN y,w CORNERSTONE uu ie_i (ou •��• I:. lie _ Ln Mark Gross Associates, Inc. PLAN 55 -4C CASE NUMBERS (SUFrTIRS70 A,DRC2012-01202 Ir•= �Y �a I� • • • NE B1 .L. =rah •S Lr E) wall • �- �.. -------------------- Lai- fill Wif iz iz -4E CASE NUMBERS (SUIRT18870&MC2012-01202 Mark Gross & Asseei'ates, Inc. PLAN 55 Ln LENNAR - LANDMARK AT CORNERSTONE 1 Sb 9 wall • Vil F-1 rj!4m J11 CW M� YR _ � I � 5zlasii s 5 Z 66 8 6 • KEVIN L.CROOK '6 PLAN 65-1 ARCHITECT i - L E N N A RHERITAGE AT CORNERSTONE �--INC. I --------------- ........... -............... .......... - ------------- --- - ---- ----- ------- --------- ---• e e 9'f ° ° r,. LEFT ------- ------ LEFT ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION Z 0 aim caw tarn rr.r f,Z ROOF PLAN cc0 PrFCH 4.12 U < ------------------- ................... 0 --- - --------- ac ---------- u -7 W < � z z RIGHT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION :5 w SPANISH 9L � 65-1.2 8�a! s .*�:• r i t Lj -------------------------- i LEFT ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION # ♦unsc wr[nw.ons m N � , , 4.123 T p 4fY.f IVnY�r Z am Falb O V — Y®raw iwn nrr M v.. 1 SY W Z GC. ROOFPLAN O PFFCH 4 12 u F- < l7 F< - ------ - - fif - - tlF LL cc < _ N Z Z RIGHT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION g w PRAIRIE d -+ 65-1.3 uu 8WEI 19t I u u 44� I Y. �• � 'v ` �a `Y Jr - ------------ -- - -------- - IT r' LEFT ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION turma WiFAM MR] � Ibf CanoMv AI M1' � Pml M1fw Lll w o �Y..d..l.r. N � 1 r`basp�a.m se. cc wpy��M.LtYrsle W z cc ROOFPLAN O PrICH 6 12 U H Q Q F W � a N z p z Z RIGHT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION S "' EUROPEAN d 65-1.44 um ! s -.i n1 1 ° a may,.•:t1 t •: 4 LEFT ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION F41 Z .®�..a..,�. W _ Z w O ROOF PLAN u PtrcH 412 r l7 H c c 2 = Z J, Z RIGHT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION g '+' ITALIAN 65-I.5 OS 9 wall • i o O v y p c ' i i Y., • My Yv Iv Y T h co) zE s r-, a KEVIN L.CROOK S PLAN 65-2 ARCHITECT INC. L E N N A RHERITAGE AT CORNERSTONE •-- �= 1 j. orf r 1;y •�T i LEFT ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION rm� w*�roms h / ► wgFc°r.orn N xm wu an 3 Fn 1Ytl�5.~db frp pevF W j / rfY.Tq YqW Z Stm Ebb ► LUYY�F�� O � 9.®fi�wlFanTM� / Daa WF6w• y SlnawF � W Z ROOF PLAN ce PITCH a 12 O U ', Q w 0 0 x K _ 0 _ t W _ _ Co0 0 Q N ZZ RIGHT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION g w SPANISH a 65-22 FRONTPsi • VI z Us cc l0 � Id' • .. PITCH 4.12 0 ce ILI w ACZce x ' ELEVATIONRIGHT ELEVATION REAR ',_ . .. . .. • .ell 1 _ ;ICO, , I j j \� a �I/ ,..I mw � nxa►x� L ux Ilill I� III 10 y.. i .... \ ' -� I <�u1 8s 1 F LEFT ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION ,Lkr TIF xvlue � wluuu xoTea � , , NooCCac•wWM1 .,r Eatl E lr 3 � w•...lr Ll , IW9m NY• W •I rY•Tro l �• Z a®ware•..*w.• � N W ROOF PLAN Z oc rircn 4 is O u HM a a x H W - - - e = r- - - - ...---"-' -- - -- ------ -- - ------ - -- - ----- - - - -- - � - -- -ilk` = a NZ ZZ RIGHT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION ITALIAN d 65-2.5 • 0 • �s ;U z°� 9'• wwl; j RML`. o ----- ----- O m NOl! W Off,BEDROOM S Q SECOND FLOOR PLAN OPT OFFICE FIRST FLOOR PLAN W AREA TAbULA1N)N = m ago n n Q M ao inn ZZ W 6. J 65-3.1 �F u= 1 sg . z< 4 V I' a •�-` l - -------- e-- ----------- - e e h moi -... r, i LEFT ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION �vnan m .or jr 3 1 �r &uq Iry.N'Jfa W .� Yrr Ldlarl GrY Dma � / _ .Ifr.iuVVwl Z / Sam Awa rrr nrr � cc Oma M.esr.♦ N s r.. fF in r W ROOFPLAN Z PITCH 4:12 K 0 U H --------------------- Q W o o Q ad a ad W B = ------------- T--M _ ___ _____ ___--...-_-__ _ _ - ---- .. __ - ----------- .-- --- __ _ __ nR K W Q _—_- N Z Z 2 RIGHT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION g "' SPANISH J 65-3.2 ............. U m - ----------- - ---- ----- LEFT ELEVATION • ELEVATION CI IP z 0 ROOFPLAN PrrCH 4 12 z cz 0 . ............... ....... .............. ------ --------- ------------ ------ --- - --- A Z z RIGHT • z REAR ELEVATION :5 . PRAHUE 4L � 65-3.3 WV - ; 04 ir -- .; LEFT ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION uj f; p\= cc e�� . •. PITCH 6 12 z Of :::: J =�1�RIGHT ELEVATION REAR EUROPEAN • • 91W u4 •«.?• i tit. ^ �•; . � e.. z< LLLLI • 4 -ti« 'Y�'�Y• • �KE. .................... .... ..........._ d....._.._.._. D D ,'rIA' Fid i• H „ i F i LEFT ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION •vauu +ur WiElNl 110,E5 Your cdw.Y,w n E—ir u 3 w...Y r •W 9WJ+pOm• r fi••lq YAW Z lO CaWYrE�� Oev.WYb�� &Yr+ N ROOFPLAN PRCH a 12 W Z O u EM IHAI t� h H W 16� Iii` C RIGHT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION g W ITALIAN a 65-3.5 09D wall M� G G I� nt G � , a �p 0 T � r � rr9 Z ' • ---------- ---------- T A -vI 1 g t � A 9 C ®C1 o � t E s ; • 'J I! IIY �-�. C6 8 6F T ]I]] P KEVIN L.CROOK ! PLAN 65-4 ARCHITECT i — L E N N A RHERITAGE AT CORNERSTONE INC. Abu 8WKI U5 1 . .... ............... ....... ----- ----- h.... . .......... -------- *'A ------- -------- - momm LEFT ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION E.YT r Z ROOF PLAN z PrrCH 4.12 cl: 0 I WE m cc .......... ---------------- {iT` ------ ---- ----- --- --- ---- cc Z z z RIGHT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION SPANISH 65-4.1 wzl ir _: Aja i tit-� ��-�� ■ LEFT ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION D eD cl ROOFPLAN ac d. iZA RIGHT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION w PRAIIUE 65-4.3 e� Iv .. _ __ -_ 'I!i�•iii�L'I: / - . ..u�...'I `I,...1,.,1 ............................. I iii iI:ii (a _ :, ,.,`., I■ uu ■ .. 1111 � � 111 1 ?w. gym_+'w' ELEVATION--------------- LEFT • ELEVATION 7 it PfTCH 4:12 :.�._ ...... • ,,� 11 1.1.. I �1■11 Ira�l��l .� 11 11 ' 1111=� 1� ■�� ul _ nn on nrr nU ELEVATIONRIGHT • US i U � c 4 �f I 'E'SPANISH 'F PRAIRIE 'G'EUROPEAN 'H'ITALIAN FRONT DOOR FRONT DOOR FRONT DOOR FRONT DOOR CASCAU 111 RAIN LUAUS U STOCKTUN 1 STIX.'KTIIN I 71 0 -Ni SONONA RANCH LEXINGTON COLON W 'E'SPANISH 'F PRAIRIE 'G'EUROPEAN 'H'ITALIAN Z ac GARAGE DOOR GARAGE DOOR GARAGE DOOR GARAGE DOOR 0 GARAGE DOORS U WAYNE DALTONUAL F 'E'SPANISH 'F PRAIRIE 'G'EUROPEAN 'H'ITALIAN Z EXTERIOR LIGHTING EXTERIOR LIGHTING EXTERIOR LIGHTING EXTERIOR LIGHTING Z EXTERIOR LIGHTING 1++ SEA GULL LIGHTING 99 9 wall v A � , P Z C 12 i a c i sst e x exx x x • a� n o v KEVIN L.CROOK S Q PLAN 70-1 ARCHITECT - LENNARVINTAGEAT CORNERSTONE-TRACT18870 .0 INC. 1. ---------- - ----------------- -- ----------- - - LEFT ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION sma Teww carts SO NO.FW Lm ESYr Z 0 ROOF PLAN z 0� PITCH 4:12 0 u < Z --------- --------- < cc Z Z z 5w RIGHT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION SANTA BARBARA REVIVAL 70.1.2 _. / 11111 1 .` 1 1 1 '-, i•l• II II' II II '/flu._.�� •1'.: .11.11.11 Ila lal. 111111 �l..•. .a� _: _ .:-: ?c a; ELEVATIONLEFr • ELEVATION .1 cl 00 ".. • • • • PITCH 4:12 w • .,....•......�.�....�.•......... .... .1.ni �i� ,iiri ° Ilau.�a .... ..... .... .. ........ IIid6�l cava s _� - ......._......-......-......-......_....... .� iili i�n L. •q IILI ? � III Up1'aO0•011i.n IIIIWnIW111�1111JI _ ELEVATIONRIGHT • BUNGA,LOW1 ...............:.I...,......:.. : '� �;:; 1111 ..,,.,....,......,..,...,..,......,...,..,......,..........,.. " . II I-....r..: ..7.. II ■Iai.I-01�L _ �I of n_ - - - - n_ =n= —— . ' ` i_ ��•i� �i�i%'� ';: rr�;• I�•'_ ._. '� ��I�iT.aa... . .aa. I�f �_'.mielIi,i I illil ----------------- L.�i..... _, ■... L - es —n— _ = I LL 9 Wall • am c.nr , S MF� g a � gyp{ i t AE c i S 0 d�5 z _Y: Y 4 • 96E b 6€ V KEVIN L.CROOK S N PLAN 70.2 ARCHITECT — LENNARVINTAGEAT CORNERSTONE-TRACTIS870 �° •--INC. WEI u jU z < .......... ---------—------ ....... . 14 le ------------- ............ -------------- ---------------: 4� LEFT ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION ob Raul RSgt1] lrwr F. 4-j Z 0 ROOF PLAN z PITCH 4:12 cc 0 u ....................... o ----— - —----- ---------- ---------- ---------—--------------- ..... ..... z --- ---------- 5 Z ZZ RIGHT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION :5 w SANTA BARBARA REVIVAL 742.2 :,, 1 r 111.:; 1 .dl 111111 _ 1 Hili 1 ... 1- ,. ..IrI. Ip„IrI.. I I�1IILY 71 •'MYWY !i JIiY .::,;:; .r..I..rnnn.m,u...nr..f.. } � .. — 1i — ...,,..:... ell =- En�i�ls u.ini 1111 ��il�� '�■■1i� �11 YIT�■■�TI II I� i �� II�III��■■�I�IIl f � .' C 111111 .. :_ 11i,, '' m inumu ... 'unm,�i:'il1mrrl .,;. .......-�� IM II�� IVol ell .,.........,...,.. .............._....... IlAilnd _ ,' I� ... mcnne mwurul — L. ..I a mn, noun un.n n n. uu �r1E■� nn "1111' 1111 • .,..Illl,,.i ..•I•'.. •--r:..... �r: ,.:.�� r .,,. „�. }. : ;: Ld .,, .,,. �.I� . llBll '1.ii1.fil�:.l�:i��'i4• moi:••. � ..� —nom`` --- -n- -n_ _ ;: , 41111 �I ;:. ._ — ................................. - - n =n- �Il I. IIS (iIlow�i„lnu—I1 KK 1 r - ❑ tt ED 'L_ I I 4n440T -fit Ib m I 1 Ma1� 1 1 JM O 4] I f " � ]Z q I I •w�i. i i fpllNl llmll T _ I CII I ❑ tt N pa Z 3 .., O ci Cv N N 01 y W S � Z 0 • � e O � U � Q I � W �2f H Q SECOND FLOOR PLAN FIRST FLOOR PLAN f Z First Floor: 1595 sq. h. m Second Floor: 1523 sq. h. n � Total Living Area: 3118 sq. h. Q Garage: 586 sq. h. Z Z Q Z J W a J 70-3.1 Ilil� IIT � ui� ..= (illi ��i=I=�l�I .Ili �11� • '------------ AA _�Il •,. �...:. ..',. d� EY�� . 11!1111! ' il.11ll.il ,�l III �I 111 I LEFT ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION MATERIAL NOTES 4 12 Ir ROOF PLAN r� . ... M- 1 1�lII�i'll in¢molnnilnminm,oni,iiomnu — — -- — -- I iimm�momoomiinooioonuom .. nm I ................::av:::....M,:.......::::..a. �1 x.7.1...: // ......... . .:. .'.So:.......... Y :' ::•%•-�••• ==It��n , Jul Ili=III • �I IIID■■■■ 'un ...II I/ uuu )Jnn� II II '! i�� }}ini��hlnn ISI ..,,I•� ,".. �i +.. nl�u, Sn5fii iii............ �G+A•. :: ::::::::. I. k� . ..... R ti �.: : : W ... ::. .w..L ::; .. ::.:::z....., �. 1111,•, 11 nnIN 11 OV" I 1 -_mac IeI III •,I •• lie °nin. 1��•. tom= �■�I �� ,I B. 'I�_.I __ .�uut i k : ., Belli1'. . ......................... Ion Mill. . � �9*1 :::s:i .r...... iss ..... � a.0 lunnn.:iiiiiiiiin .Io�^"—.N. u� Ian Ill�l•llmn �-•,' . n _--.��..I... I�■ .m.'� i' nn�. Mel ■ ■■ ■■ n U.. / uuin n nmI LI ..., ,. li■I.,... Ili Olp■ h.SSSt'RRh::: .,5.- tiL" nu inti �M71t81CS51G1 aakS} u"u'oVu7uau& '' ■■ ❖: }� w 1., 1 ql In 1 i . II U ill 7 `I 1011Mil l II�� 'll ouiu. i ..u.a'i 11.1111. illi �� Iwlwlwlriaerk�`■■ ■ ■ ISI "•°'� III m _Alile �Iwlwlwl nun _/.__-_ --_ -_ Ill ___ Ilio n1—�n ��wlwl�■r�nr�m-__ un_u. R31 — �•53L5hRRR555..555:...- .•Y:.::":::::t:.'•':::.:SYS.:�:::::SNa.. ....................:. :S5155S5Y:::.555:51.:..LiS•..:::::••5:::... -7: !L'••::........!..Q.. .::........55585:::::;�7:... 6,1. • n�;.n-. ohm Vin;,4nnu �nm5�u.•. a amu uuuu n;�n _ 11111 ��111 ��:i�� F -��! ., n ::' Illu='III Lri�� r-•• r AMAMM.................................. n'iu: :uu.'iui ..... liillllili 1111,1II��II ' • �� I .■ i. 1�1� Wif ... .:.. . .............. .......... ::... ...............:.;;................................. . :.:.r: '� I�� LI==II 11111' 1l,But �� IIIIII1111 IIIIIIIIII m�• ::ti::��titititititititii'r.}itiiti:•:•5{;.Lu�J - - II - - ON f. l I I .� MIN E:�E:� • 1 /� . .�;mitisiidvrrrttii�iiidsiu:'x:r•::::s:r:is:::::•••••••••'s::s•••••••:... '� ?t.l �i6 ana�5 � `�� :I • _ •L=i:iU �I". ! ';LiC= I• , �� . — _ � umglmu_ il� � mililpuiull --------------------- FRONT ELEVATION LEFT ELEVATION �r fir' MATERIAL NOTES CONCRETE'FLAr TILE �~Tft 1215 00 cc ROOF PLAN u •iii: 'iiiiiiis ' •�siii{; :fit:; REAR ELEVATION CL RIGHT ELEVATION RANCH 70-3.5 .ossa:.;isiiiii:�iiiiiE;iiii:i:::••— _ ii ��::i?Iii�I i:'ii'r:�?:iii::'.�•. nS.�Ln.:ii:inn�ninninnunb•"••- � - ■I■LLLLLLI 7�,■I■LLLia■Llys-�� , .. - wa- A m Y Xt ruw rm � 1 It 1. I � m ❑ i e a w q . a a O E 77 c.unwe I I- I e I I (D Ya f I i wmxllem — W 3 i., I Z 0 m O 0 I � W a Z I°Oraem f �_ K u m 2 Q W SECOND FLOOR PLAN FIRST FLOOR PLAN 1- Z First Floor: 1696 sq. ft. v j Second Floor: 1692 sq. ft. o Total Living Area: 3388 sq. ft. ^ °e Garage: S09 sq. ft. Z Z Z Q Z J W a J 70-4.1 iV J • ' „1.. ~!'�".` ilii I■ ■■ Ip�l� • ni mu nnUinunuunpnm',nm Ir�p:l III I■ ■■ ,•. i'. All IIIII IIIIIJIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIiIII'.IIIII ,••, m I IeTC: 1 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII'lltlll.11lllllllll - !` 1 illi IIIII IIIIIIIIIII,IIIIIIIIIIf,1111111110. _ 1 p Ii LEFT ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION ONCRETE TILE MATERIAL NOTES I Ta 0 12 Ir Z wr �Aw ilii. �-- - • 00 to ILI,� ROOF PLAN • im ?M!t Ill .11; Ir�� - 11,1 11_� '' I� 'a'S'Sn55iu5iii5'nn�u'�:o:'i5nnuunnu.upnunuum y .n.��uJ.. �� • �- i:'::.....n..i.55.....55.::ii:n 5555:::1 nuu:ni:::ii��nin�n "J =• •. ..I..uu •�. . . i ..� //// �. rI■■ ISI -','��- � ■■ LI 1 ��z�a 'Li/. ".• ; �.L tA..�A.55S.L A L4151Sn ./_ "•!5; 4• .. 1 ' _ ' ._L_.—._ -• ■ ■ , I I I r� ■'�■II'`' x11 _ E • l' All Lot all I •'• �•a•- '-'•/ S7N :L\SV:.VL5LS.31h5h4YS:S.R1 :..::isrtitisitiav::...: ..:.. ..�r::nnnnnnnunu. .Snomn'�ui55. ��- ni:.55 ' 1 s 554•• :i va��yn:.. saw'\ ..' 111'. ?'+• III1111�� iyn ti�u wn L�� _ III ulllll 11.. ::.. �; :::::::. ..........:::::::.::::ti . i:::..:::.::: r .^ ..... J • `'��'��"' � IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII_ •x1.555'::......5:..... • _ _ •x 1::.5�:::. ........5•:::r•- ::::��.�•:��i':f'r:5:55:::55•::::...i'::.5'::... .•1i'�.ir5:':i'::.��5�::555:::::�•:::I:i':��::.u•� �rfl :::_._51::1 P. •'�\4......�� ... �.....rr........-yi ..r ......r..................Ir ...... •'� .. ull Ill��ENlll " II;;'II II;;II LlpppLl Illliiil1111 - ." ' 11 111 11111111 11111111I11 1 111 1 1 IIIA _ nnnnnuuuuuuuuuumnunnuuunnnnuuunnnnnm �. }i.••` u,,,.mn.n.4.:n �tiu.• iii�:u:::i • J - iAti.✓• MATERIAL NOTESCONCRETELEFT ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION 00 Ln ce us ROOF :a • P,5,. ttitivir t— RIGM az vw RANCH 0 , 98 E) wall • r7l C, c F-1 KEVIN L.CR PLAN 70-5 ARCHITECT k INC. �- LENNARVINTAGEAT CORNERSTONE-TPLACT18870 L u -- --------- --- 1111 ----------------------- --------- ----------------- --------------- - ------------------------- LEFT ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION 00 z 0 ROOF PLAN z PITCH 4:12 cit 0 U ................. .......... ------Mm. ----------- ---------------------------- w z ----------- ---------------------------------- ------ ---------- acz Z z RIGHT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION IL 1� SANTA BARBARA REVIVAL 70-5.2 .I i ��•• �,1 '__ IIIIUIIIL•■a11.-14�x1111■IIIiLIIIL■111 111'■11111\ IIIILIIII `:.. .. 1u11.n.u_.1...._..... 1r.1.01111�.II q i■�. !nrl1l�1�l1ll�1l 1�uu II\' II n1 � nu■nunnu�In 1. �i�.mn -�nul il• wll 111 If-' 1�i11 (��I I I�1111111 I��I�IIII LEFT ml �1��1-� ■ 1 In ELEVATION 00 00 La S�Moo • O PITCH 4:12 CC• ce RIGHT .. .. 1nll nl n 1 :nll nl l•::::�:::::' 11■III ■II III II� IP�ItI .11 �!�x,_,p Ir.gl I rill• Ir.1 1. 11.1111.1111 x1111-.n �iin�ii�:::::• 1111.1111 ILIOrxIp1■11;1 nIW III u..... uum 1 u 1 Il nl PII■1111■1111 x111111 1 I • • BUNGALOW1 - - .........,...........,....,......,......,... .::.::..,,.....,.........:.........,..,...,..........................,........ ... N�VVY�i1V�\Y Y�ILIZ., IIII 111 1111 .....� :IIIIIIII :.:�'::, IIIc 1 1I I III 111 - _ 111 ��i��l� '. •.• • I: e:�:ap::me .. ...1111,.,. .. . ....._..._ ,.. s.... II ' [..:.....Ti.. Ull • /w ''....................s i'' ....M, : ��.' 111111 .:vl; _ . El E1 ' ,,,,,,. III)111111 IIII ` � moll Bill " � mill I . --- — _I —n �. 2 o — Qr Iaij _rtJ. _ :.......:::.:..................... ......................,.,.. ,..,...,.......,.,.... ,,.. ............................................. —nom smog IIJ :- IL- =1i _—_ �i ��' .' — is"ri5' ' :",'is 5 ;i;: 2127!eii � ... = e_ Foull li .o$. .OR: . . tri x:---=-Y_�.3; • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS April 30, 2013 Mike Smith April 30, 2013 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18870 — LENNAR HOMES OF CALIFORNIA - A request to subdivide a vacant parcel of approximately 3,047,614 square feet (79.67 acres) into 291 lots within the Low Medium (LM) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan (South Overlay), located approximately 525 feet east of Etiwanda Avenue at the north side of Arrow Route-APN: 0229-041-09. Related file: Development Review ORC2012-01202. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2012-01202 LENNAR HOMES OF CALIFORNIA - A review of 291 single-family homes that will be constructed in conjunction with a proposed subdivision of a parcel of approximately 3,047,614 square feet(79.67-acres) within the Low Medium (LM) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan (South Overlay), located approximately 525 feet east of Etiwanda Avenue at the north side of Arrow Route -APN: 0229-041-09. Related file: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18870. Site Characteristics: The project site is an irregularly-shaped vacant parcel with an overall area of approximately 3.5 million square feet (80.8 acres). The site is approximately 1,900 feet deep (north to south); because of its irregular shape, it is approximately 1,300 feet wide (east to west) at the north property line and approximately 2,100 feet wide at the south property line. There is a 'dog leg'extension that is approximately 232 feet in width and 688 feet in length at the northwest corner of the property that extends to Foothill Boulevard. • The project site was previously used by Ameron, a concrete pipe manufacturer located nearby at the southwest comer of Etiwanda Avenue and Arrow Route, for outdoor storage (finished pipe segments). To the west of the project site are the Victoria Woods apartment complex and a single-family residential subdivision. To the north is the San Sevaine Villas apartment complex. To the east are single-family residences, a mobile home park, and some minor industrial uses within the unincorporated San Bernardino County. To the south are legal, non-conforming single-family residences, industrial uses (principally outdoor storage), and several vacant parcels. Principal street frontage will be along Arrow Route with a length of approximately 2,100 feet. Secondary street frontage will be along Foothill Boulevard with a length of approximately 232 feet (at the north end of the aforementioned "dog leg'). A corridor comprised of easements in favor of Southern California Edison (SCE) and Southern California Gas Company (SCGC), and associated improvements, such as transmission lines, are located parallel to the west property line of the project site. This corridor is approximately 22 acres in area. The 'dog leg' portion of the property is entirely within this corridor. Because of the presence of this utility corridor, the actual area of the project site that is available for development is approximately 64 acres. The Etiwanda/San Sevaine flood control channel is located parallel to the east property line of the project site. The zoning of the majority of the site is Low Medium (LM) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan (South Overlay); the portion of the site that is within the utility corridor described above is zoned Open Space (OS) District The zoning of the properties to the west beyond the utility corridor are Low (L), Low Medium (LM), and Medium (M) Residential Districts, and Etiwanda Specific Plan (South Overlay). The zoning of the property to the north is Medium (M) Residential District, Foothill Boulevard Overlay Zoning District (Subarea 4). The zoning of the properties to the south is General Industrial (GI) District. The subject property is generally level with an elevation at the north and south sides of approximately 1,180 feet and 1,155 feet, respectively. EXHIBIT H Item G 91 DRC ACTION AGENDA • SUBTT18870 AND DRC2012-01202 April 30, 2013 Page 2 General: The applicant proposes to subdivide the property into 291 numbered lots for a private (gated) single-family residential development. There will be an additional eleven (11) lettered lots for an existing, unrelated Souther California Gas Company facility (Lot A) and common areas as follows: open space along the Arrow Route street frontage (Lots B — D); two private parks (Lots E and F); pedestrian access pathways (Lots G and H), and private streets (Lot 1). All lots will comply with the development standards applicable to this zoning district as described in Figure 5-2 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Individual lot areas will range between 5,000 square feet to 13,450 square feet, which are in excess of the minimum of 5,O00 square feet that is required. The minimum average lot area is 8,738 square feet, which is in excess of the minimum 6,000 square feet that is required. The depth of each lot will be at least 90 feet, and the width of each let at the required front setback will be at least 50 feet (with 50 percent of the lots being a minimum of 55 feet in width as required by the Ethvands Specific Plan). Included in the proposal is a network of private streets and two (2) gated entrances that will link the site to Arrow Route. As streets are not permitted within the utility corridor, there will not be any vehicle access directly to Foothill Boulevard. Along the south side of the project site, along the Arrow Route street frontage, there will be a series of community entry monument signs, decorative vehicle gates, omate wood trellis structures, and extensive landscaping. In addition to aesthetically enhancing the entrance into the project site, these features will, in combination with a continuous perimeter block wall, buffer the project site from existing/potential industrial land uses on the properties on the other side of Arrow Route. Two private parks are proposed within the interior of the subdivision. These parks will include typical playground equipment, open lawn areas, benches, and decorative entry trellises. • Within the utility corridor a 20-foot wide trail will be constructed per Figure CS-3 — Hiking and Riding Trails Master Plan — of the General Plan. This trail will be a part of the Community Trail network. The alignment of this trail will extend from Arrow Route to Foothill Boulevard. Per the General Plan, Arrow Route will be the south terminus of the trail, i.e. the trail will not continue further south. At Foothill Boulevard the trail will eventually conned with the trail segment that will be constructed by other . in conjunction with future development on the other side of that street. As the trail will be located within the easements of both SCE and SCGC, trail-related improvements will be restricted based on meetings with representatives of both utilities. Therefore, the installation of fences, light standards, landscaping, etc. that are typically required for Community Trails may be very limited or not present altogether along this segment of the Community Trail system. In conjunction with the tentative tract map, the applicant proposes to construct a single-family residence on each lot for a total of 291 single-family residences. Seventy-three (73) of the houses will be one-story, while the houses on the remainder of the lots will be two-story. This equates to 25 percent of the lots having single-story houses. This mix of one- and two-story homes is consistent with the policy adopted by the Planning Commission requiring that 25 percent (minimum) of the proposed houses be single-story. The project will comply with Section 5.42.606 of the Etiwanda Speck Plan which requires that 50 percent of the garages to be oriented or situated in a manner that minimizes its visual presence. The houses on all comer lots will be single-story as required per Section 5.42.608 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The applicant proposes nine (9) types of architectural themes (elevations) — Santa Barbara Revival, Bungalow, Ranch, Country, Monterey, Spanish, Prairie, European, and Italian. Each house will • Item G 92 • DRC ACTION AGENDA SUBTT18870 AND DRC2012-01202 April 30, 2013 Page 3 incorporate a variety of materials to varying degrees depending on the theme. Each house will have an articulated footprint/floor plan and profile. The applicant proposes thirteen (13) distinct footprints -Plans 55 (1 to 4), 65 (1 to 4), and 70 (1 to 5) - and reverse footprints of each for a total of twenty-six (26) footprints. Plans 55-1, 65-1, 70-1, and 70-2 will be one-story, while the others will be two-story. The number of available footprints will comply with Figure 5-45 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Because the footprints and profiles of each house differ, there will be a variety of movement in the wall planes and roof lines. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Major Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project. 1. All themes (all plans) -Where a decorative stone veneer wainscot and trimcap is provided at the front elevation, add a decorative stone veneer wainscot and trimcap to the entire width of the rear elevation to match it. Alternate solutions such as adding stone veneer to an entire section of wall plane may be considered. Note: At the comer of each house, where the side elevation intersects with the rear elevation, the veneer shall wrap around the comer and terminate at a logical point along the side elevation. At the comer of each house, where the side elevation intersects with the front elevation, the veneer shall wrap around the comer and terminate at the return well. • 2. All themes (all plans) - On plans that have a decorative wood siding at the front elevation, where the side elevation intersects with the front elevation, the siding shall wrap around the comer and terminate at the return wall. 3. All themes (all plans) - Provide additional shutters on the windows on both floors on all elevations (it is ngi necessary to provide them on ao windows). Note: Some plans, for example Plans 65 and 70, already have shutters on all windows. On the plans where shutters have already been provided, it is not necessary to add more. 4. All themes (all two-story plans) - Add corbels beneath the areas of the second floor that project beyond the primary wall plane. No: Some plans, for example Plans 65 and 70, already have corbels or have a clearly defined trim at the bottom of the projection. On the plans where corbels or trim has already been provided, it is not necessary to add anything. 5. All themes (all plans) -Add decorative wrought iron metalwork or pot shelves at the windows (it is not necessary to provide them at all windows). YqLeSome plans, for example Plans 7042, -3.3, -3.4, and-4.2, already have these features. On the plans where these features have already been provided, d may not be necessary to add more. 6. Bungalow, Ranch, and Country (all plans) - Increase the height of the decorative stone veneer wainscot and trimcap that is proposed at the garages to a line that is 6 feet above the finished surface. • Item G 93 DRC ACTION AGENDA • SUBTT18870 AND ORC2012-01202 April 30, 2013 Page 4 7. Bungalow (all Plans) -Add/increase the number of rafter tails at the eaves of the gabled roofs on all elevations. 8. Ranch (all Plans)-Increase the application of the board and batten siding so that it covers more of the primary wall plane beneath the gabled roofs on at the rear elevation of the one-story plan and both the left and right elevations of the two-story plans so that the area of this wall plane that is only finished with stucco is reduced. 9. Bungalow (all Plans except Plan 70-1.3) - Increase the application of the wood shingle siding so that it covers more of the primary wall plane beneath the gabled roofs on at the rear elevation of the one-story plan and both the left and right elevations of the two-story plans so that the area of this wag plane that is only finished with stucco is reduced. 10. Prairie (Plan 65-1.3) -Add more rectangular insets beneath the hip roof at the rear elevation so that their number is proportional to the area where they are located. 11. Santa Barbara Revival (all plans) -Where shutters have been provided, the general shape of the shutter shall match the general shape/outline of the window area they would enclose, e.g. arched window openings should have arched shutters. 12. Bungalow(all plans)-Continue the wood siding that has been applied to the front elevation around • to the right side elevation. The wood siding shall terminate directly above the where the stone veneer terminates. NQ,@: Both the stone veneer and the siding wrap shall terminate at the return wag. 13. Bungalow (Plan 55-4.3) - The design of the columnstbases that support the porch cover shall match the design of the same feature in, for example, Plans 552.3 and 70-3.3. 14. Country (Plan 55-2.4) -The design of the columnstbases that support the porch cover shall match the design of the same feature in, for example, Pians 55.4.4 and 70.2.4. 15. Italian (all Plans) - The belt-line at the front elevation and part of the left elevation shall be continued along all elevations. 16. Italian (Plan 65.4.5) -The sets of square corbel pairs at the front elevation beneath the area of the second floor that projects beyond the primary wall plane shall be repeated on the similar projections located at the rear and left elevations. 17. European (Plan 65-1.4) - The application and design of the decorative stone veneer projection beneath the front window shall be duplicated on the rear elevation. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues. 1. The molding along the top of the stone or brick veneer wainscots shall also be stone or brick and not foam. • Item G 94 • DRC ACTION AGENDA SUBTT18870 AND DRC2012-01202 April 30, 2013 Page 5 2. All rock veneer shall be real river rock and not synthetic. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the project be revised and resubmitted for follow-up review by the Committee prior to forwarding it to the Planning Commission for review and action. Desian Review Committee Action: Staff presented a brief overview of the project and summarized the major/secondary issues relating to the architecture and site development. Staff noted that the content and direction of the report prepared for this meeting took into consideration the feedback that was received by staff during the Planning Commission's Design Workshop held on April 10, 2013. The Committee then reviewed some of the proposed elevations of various models and indicated where the applicant needed to provide more enhancements to the architecture(using the Comments Report as a template for discussion). They were in agreement that the front elevations needed only limited enhancements (or none at all). They also agreed with the staff observation that extensive architectural embellishment on the lower part of the side elevations, where the building setbacks from the side property line could be as low as 5 feet, limited the "value' of such enhancements as they would have limited visibility to the public or the homeowner. Instead, the enhancements that would normally be provided along the lower pan of the side elevations should be applied to the rear elevations. They noted that the upper part of the side elevations should still have enhancements. The Committee considered the rear elevations, as proposed, to be generally unacceptable. More specifically, they pointed out to the applicant that the architectural theme that the • front of the house implied needed to be continued on the rear elevation. As proposed, the features, trim, and/or details that were typical of a particular theme were not present on the rear elevations. In the absence of such enhancements, the rear elevations of each house were practically the same, and the theme that the architects were attempting to convey was not apparent. The applicant's architects, using tissue paper, illustrated several solutions. Some of the solutions presented by the architects were consistent with staffs recommendations. When they were not, the alternative achieved similar objectives. The Committee responded favorably with the understanding that each model and elevation would have a unique solution. For example, when a wainscot of stone veneer would be impractical along the full horizontal width of the rear elevation, the architects proposed veneers that were applied vertically to support a pop-out feature directly above ft. Similarly, altering the design of the trim around some windows would provide the illusion of a window inset without significant restructuring of the window area. Other solutions not previously suggested by staff but forwarded by the applicant inGuded revisions to the roof design to interrupt relatively large wall planes. The applicant and his architects accepted that more details such as shutters, pot shelves, etc. needed to be provided and would incorporate them accordingly. Because of the number of models and corresponding elevations that needed to be revised, all parties recognized that the design issues would not be fully resolved at this meeting and that additional effort and time would be necessary. The Committee directed the applicant to consult with staff on the revisions. When the revised proposal is ready, the applicant shall resubmit it to the Committee for review and action at a later, regularly scheduled meeting. Members Present: Fletcher, Oaxaca, Granger Staff Planner: Mike Smith • Item G 95 DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS • 7:00 p.m. Mike Smith August 20, 2013 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2012-01202 — LENNAR HOMES OF CALIFORNIA - A review of 291 single-family homes that will be constructed in conjunction with a proposed subdivision of a parcel of about 3,047,614 square feet (79.67 acres) within the Low Medium (LM) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan (South Overlay), located about 525 feet east of Etiwanda Avenue at the north side of Arrow Route - APN: 0229-041-09. Related file: Tentative Tract Map SUBT718870 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00483. Background: The proposed project was reviewed by the Committee on April 30, 2013. At that time the subdivision application, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18870, was accepted as submitted and recommended for approval to the Planning Commission. However, the application for the review of the design of the proposed homes, Development Review DRC2012-01202, was not accepted. The Committee determined that the certain details of the architecture of each house modeVplan needed to be revised before they could forward the application. The applicant was directed to revise the proposal for a follow-up review by the Committee (Exhibit A). Staff Comments: Staff has conducted a side-by-side comparison of the original and revised plans and has concluded, in general, that the applicant has completed the revisions as discussed at the Design Review Committee meeting on April 30, 2013. The applicant has made the following changes identified in italics. Note: Staff will provide a set of both the original and revised plans and show the changes that were made to the Committee during the meeting. • 1. All themes (all Plans) — Where a decorative stone veneer wainscot and trimcap is provided at the front elevation, add a decorative stone veneer wainscot and trimcap to the entire width of the rear elevation to match it. Alternate solutions such as adding stone veneer to an entire section of wall plane may be considered. Note: At the comer of each house, where the side elevation intersects with the rear elevation, the veneer shall wrap around the comer and terminate at a logical point along the side elevation. At the corner of each house, where the side elevation intersects with the front elevation, the veneer shall wrap around the comer and terminate at the return wall. Proposed revision(s) by the applicant: • Added stone or brick veneer to part of the rear elevation in the area at the sliding door and/or rear windows. The veneer will correspond with the veneer that is proposed to be on the front elevation of each house. Where no veneer is proposed on the front elevation, such as on the Santa Barbara Revival, Spanish, and Italian themes, no veneer has been added. • For Plans 70-1.2 through -1.5 and 70-2.2 through -2.5, the applicant has articulated the walls around the patio cover at the rear elevation so that this area slightly projects from the primary wall plane. • For Plans 55-2.2 through -2.5, the wall plane at the right elevation has been articulated in the area near the second floor window. However, on some other plans, the articulated wall plane was eliminated. Staff recommends that, where applicable, these pop-outs that were originally proposed near the second floor windows on the side elevation be restored to that location. OEXHIBIT Item G 96 DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTION AGENDA DRC2012-01012— LENNAR HOMES OF CALIFORNIA • August 20, 2013 Page 2 2. All themes (all Plans) — On Plans that have a decorative wood siding at the front elevation, where the side elevation intersects with the front elevation, the siding shall wrap around the corner and terminate at the return wall. Proposed revision(s) by the applicant: The applicant agreed to do this where wood siding has been proposed. 3. All themes (all Plans) — Provide additional shutters on the windows on both floors on all elevations (it is not necessary to provide them on all windows). Note: Some Plans, for example Plans 65 and 70, already have shutters on all windows. On the plans where shutters have already been provided, it is not necessary to add more. Proposed revision(s) by the applicant: • Removed the shutters from the side elevations where, as discussed during the review meeting, it was agreed by all participants that they would have limited aesthetic value. • Removed the shutters at the second floor windows on the rear elevations of some two-story plans and at the first floor windows on the rear elevation of some one-story plans. Staff recommends that, where applicable, the shutters that were originally proposed at these • windows on the rear elevation be restored to those locations. • Relocated the shutters from the First floor windows to the second floor windows at the rear elevations. Staff recommends that, where applicable, the shutters that were originally proposed at the first floor windows on the rear elevation be restored to that location, i.e. the shutters at the second floor windows should be an addition to the shutter at the first floor windows, not a one-to-one replacement. 4. All themes (all two-story Plans) — Add corbels beneath the areas of the second floor that project beyond the primary wall plane. Note: Some Plans, for example Plans 65 and 70, already have corbels or have a clearly defined trim at the bottom of the projection. On the plans where corbels or trim has already been provided, it is not necessary to add anything. Proposed revision(s) by the applicant: • Added corbels beneath the areas of the second floor that project beyond the primary wall plane of, for example, the theme. • Added scallops beneath the areas of the second floor that project beyond the primary wall plane at the rear and side elevations of the Spanish and Santa Barbara Revival themes. • Added support columns beneath the areas of the second floor that project beyond the primary wall plane at the rear elevations. These columns also include a decorative veneer. • Item G 97 DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTION AGENDA • DRC2012-01012— LENNAR HOMES OF CALIFORNIA August 20, 2013 Page 3 Modified the areas of the second floor that project beyond the primary wall plane so that the projections are on both the first and second floors 5. All themes (all Plans) —Add decorative wrought iron metalwork or pot shelves at the windows (it is not necessary to provide them at all windows). Note: Some Plans, for example Plans 70-3.2, -3.3, -3.4, and-4.2, already have these features. On the plans where these features have already been provided, it may not be necessary to add more. Proposed revision(s) by the applicant: Alternate solutions were presented during the previous Committee meeting — see the proposed solutions discussed for Issue #4. 8. Bungalow, Ranch, and Country (all Plans) — Increase the height of the decorative stone veneer wainscot and trimcap that is proposed at the garages to a line that is 8 feet above finished surface. Proposed revision(s) by the applicant: Not completed, staff recommends that this revision be completed as a condition of approval. • 7. Bungalow (all Plans) —Addfincrease the number of rafter tails at the eaves of the gabled roofs on all elevations. Proposed revision(s) by the applicant: Completed as requested; the applicant also added rafter tails where necessary to balance the corresponding rafter tails on the other elevations. 8. Ranch (all Plans) — Increase the application of the board and batten siding so that it covers more of the primary wall plane beneath the gabled roofs at the rear elevation of the one-story plan and both the left and right elevations of the two-story plans so that the area of this wall plane that is only finished with stucco is reduced. Proposed revision(s) by the applicant: Completed as requested in limited areas; staff recommends that this revision be completed as a condition of approval. 9. Bungalow (all Plans except Plan 70-1.3) — Increase the application of the wood shingle siding so that it covers more of the primary wall plane beneath the gabled roofs on at the rear elevation of the one-story plan and both the left and right elevations of the two-story plans so that the area of this wall plane that is only finished with stucco is reduced. Proposed revision(s) by the applicant. Completed as requested in limited areas; staff recommends that this revision be completed as a • condition of approval. Item G 98 DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTION AGENDA DRC2012-01012— LENNAR HOMES OF CALIFORNIA August 20, 2013 • Page 4 10. Prairie (Plan 65-1.3) — Add more rectangular insets beneath the hip roof at the rear elevation so that their number is proportional to the area where they are located. Proposed revision(s)by the applicant: Completed as requested. 11. Santa Barbara Revival (all Plans) —Where shutters have been provided, the general shape of the shutter shall match the general shape/outline of the window area they would enclose, e.g. arched window openings should have arched shutters. Proposed revision(s) by the applicant: Completed as requested; this has also been done for other themes/plans, as well, where applicable. 12. Bungalow (all Plans) — Continue the wood siding that has been applied to the front elevation around to the right side elevation. The wood siding shall terminate directly above where the stone veneer terminates. Note: Both the stone veneer and the siding shall wrap and terminate at the return wall. Proposed revision(s) by the applicant: • Completed as requested where applicable. 13. Bungalow (Plan 55-4.3) — The design of the columns/bases that support the porch cover shall match the design of the same feature in, for example, Plans 55-2.3 and 70-3.3. Proposed revision(s) by the applicant: Completed as requested. 14. Country (Plan 55-2.4) —The design of the columns/bases that support the porch cover shall match the design of the same feature in, for example, Plans 55-4.4 and 70-2.4. Proposed revision(s) by the applicant: Completed as requested. 15. Italian (all Plans) — The belt-line at the front elevation and part of the left elevation shall be continued along all elevations. Proposed revision(s) by the applicant: The Committee did not deem this necessary; the applicant did not make this revision. • Item G 99 DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTION AGENDA • DRC2012-01012— LENNAR HOMES OF CALIFORNIA August 20, 2013 Page 5 16. Italian (Plan 65.4.5) —The sets of square corbel pairs at the front elevation beneath the area of the second floor that projects beyond the primary wall plane shall be repeated on the similar projections located at the rear and left elevations. Proposed revision(s) by the applicant: Completed as requested. 17. European (Plan 65-1.4) — The application and design of the decorative stone veneer projection beneath the front window shall be duplicated on the rear elevation. Proposed revision(s) by the applicant: Completed as requested,• also, the edges of the projection have been modified slightly so that it is more distinctive. 18. General Comment: The applicant has also curved the top edge of some of the shutters to match the curve of the adjacent windows and the top edge of the decorative trim above the windows and doors have been curved. In some instances, the size of the shutters has been enlarged. • 19. General Comment: On the side elevations of some themes, projections beyond the primary wall plane have been added. For examples, see Plans 55-2.2, -2.3, -2.4, and -2.5. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues. None. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the project be approved, with the above-noted revisions incorporated by the applicant, and those recommended by staff, and forwarded to the Planning Commission for review and action. Desinn Review Committee Action: The Committee accepted the proposal as submitted, subject to the satisfactory completion of revisions that the Committee requested during the meeting and recommended approval to the Planning Commission. The applicant is to coordinate the revisions with staff to verify compliance with their direction prior to Planning Commission review and action Members Present: Fletcher, Oaxaca, Granger Staff Planner: Mike Smith • Item G 100 • TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMENT SHEET May 8, 2013 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18870 - LENNAR HOMES OF CALIFORNIA-A request to subdivide a vacant parcel of about 3,047,814 square feet (79.87-acres) into 291 lots in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District, Etiwanda Speck Plan (South Overlay), located about 525 feet east of Etiwanda Avenue at the north side of Arrow Route; APN: 0229-041.09. Related file: Development Review DRC2012-01202. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2012-01202-LENNAR HOMES OF CALIFORNIA - A review of 291 single-family homes that will be constructed in conjunction with a proposed subdivision of a parcel of about 3,047,814 square feet(79.87-aass)in the Low Medium(LM) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan(South Overlay), located about 525 feet east of Etiwanda Avenue at the north side of Arrow Route;APN:0229-041-09. Related file: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT1870. Site Characteristics: The project site is an irregularly shaped vacant parcel with an overall area of about 3.5 million square feet (80.8 acres). The site is approximately 1,900 feet deep (north to south); because of its irregular shape,it is approximately 1,300 feet wide(east to west)at the north property line and approximately 2,100 feet wide at the south property line. There is a 'dog leg' extension that is approximately 270 feet in width and 888 feet in length at the northwest corner of the property that extends to Foothill Boulevard. The project site was previously used by Ameron,a concrete pipe manufacturer located nearby at the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Arrow Route, for outdoor storage (of, for example, finished pipe segments). To the west of the project site are the Victoria Woods apartment complex • and a single-family residential subdivision. To the north is the San Sevaine Villas apartment complex. To the east are single-family residences,a mobile home park,and some minor industrial uses located within a portion of unincorporated San Bernardino County(Exhibit &Ariel Map). To the south are legal, non-conforming single-family residences, industrial uses (principally outdoor storage), and several vacant parcels. Principal street frontage will be along Arrow Route with a length of approximately 2,100 feet. Secondary street frontage YA be along Foothill Boulevard with a length of approximately 270 feet (at the north end of the aforementioned "dog leg). A corridor comprised of easements in favor of Southern California Edison(SCE)and Southern California Gas Company(SCGC),and associated improvements such as transmission lines,are located parallel to the west property line of the project site. The width of the easement for SCE is 250 feet while the width of three (3) separate easements for SCGC is 110 feet (combined). This corridor is approximately 22 acres in area. The'dog leg'portion of the property is entirety within this corridor. Because of the presence of this utility corridor,the actual area of the project site that is available for development is approximately 84 acres. The Etiwanda/San Sevaine flood control channel is located parallel to the east property line of the project site. The zoning of the majority of the site is Low Medium (LM) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan(South Overlay);the portion of the site that is within the utility corridor described above is zoned Open Space(OS) District. The zoning of the properties to the west beyond the utility corridor are Low (L), Low Medium (LM), and Medium(M) Residential Districts, Etiwanda Specific Plan (South Overlay). The zoning of the property to the north is Medium (M) Residential District, Foothill Boulevard Overlay Zoning District(Subarea 4). The zoning of the properties to the south is General Industrial (GI) District. The subject property is generally level with an elevation at the north and south sides of about 1,180 feet and 1,155 feet, respectively. There are no trails (Local or Community) that link the project site to existing trails. OXHIBIT J Item G 101 TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18870 AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2012-01202— LENNAR HOMES OF CALIFORNIA May 8, 2013 • Page 2 Desion Parameters: The applicant proposes to construct a north-south segment of the Community Trail within the aforementioned utility corridor per Figure CS-3— Hiking and Riding Trails Master Plan—of the General Plan in conjunction with subdivision of the property into 291 numbered lots for a private (gated) single-family residential development. There will be an additional eleven (11) lettered lots for an existing,unrelated Southern Gas Company facility(Lot A)and common areas as follows: open space along the Arrow Route street frontage(Lots B—D); two private parks(Lots E and F); pedestrian access pathways(Lots G and H), and private streets (Lot 1). This Community Trail segment will extend the full distance between Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Route. It will be located generally adjacent,and parallel,to the eastern limit of the utility corridor and the rear property lines of proposed Lots 1—21, 138, 137,and 141-146. The total length of the trail will be about 2,700 feet. Per the General Plan,Arrow Route will be the south terminus of the trail, i.e.,the trail will not continue further south. At Foothill Boulevard the trail will eventually conned with the trail segment that will be constructed by others in conjunction with future development on the other side of that street. Two(2)pedestrian connections,with decorative features such as overhead trellises, will link the subdivision to the Community Trail. These connections are located between Lots 20 and 21, and Lots i and 137 (identified as Lots G and H, respectively). Based on separate meetings with representatives of SCE and SCGC, as the trail will be located within the overlapping easements of both utilities where infrastructure is present(SCE transmission towers and lines above-ground and a SCGC pipeline below ground), the design of the trail will be subject to their authority and restrictions. Trail-related improvements such as fences, light standards, landscaping, etc.that are typically required for Community Trails may be very limited or • not present altogether along this segment of the Community Trail system. For example,trees that could encroach into the clear area required around SCE's power lines while the roots of the trees could damage SCGC's pipeline. Therefore,trees are not permitted within the corridor. Similarly, fences would affect both utilities'maintenance vehicle access to their respective infrastructure and are,therefore,prohibited. Potential expansion of either company's infrastructure could be affected by semi-permanent improvements such as benches and fight poles. Thus,these improvements are also not permitted. Both SCE and SCGC will require that the applicant submit plans for their respective review and approval. Staff anticipates that the trail most likely will be limited to a pathway composed of decomposed granite, a concrete mow strip to define its edges, and ground cover. Staff proposes planting trees within the rear yard area of Lots 1 —21, 138, 137,and 141 —146. This would offset the lack of trees within the trail and would be located completely outside of the limits of the utility corridor. Trees would be planted at a rate of two(2)trees per yard for a total of sixty-two (62)trees. Staff Recommendation: Staff requests that the Trails Advisory Committee members review the proposed Tentative Tract Map and recommend approval to the Planning Commission with the following conditions: 1. The Community Trail and entry points at Arrow Route and Foothill Boulevard shall be designed and constructed per the City Standard for Community Trails to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and Planning Manager. The design of the trail and associated improvements shall be coordinated with, and are subject to the approval of, Southern California Edison and Southern California Gas Company. • Item G 102 TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18870 AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2012-01202— • LENNAR HOMES OF CALIFORNIA May 8, 2013 Page 3 2. A copy of any comments and/or corrections in response to plans submitted to SCE and SCGC shall be provided to the City for determination of alternate solutions,if necessary,and for the file record. 3. Install two (2) trees within the rear yard area of Lots 1 — 21, 138, 137, and 141 — 148. The species and minimum box size of these trees shall match the tree requirements described in the City Standard applicable to Community Trails as established by the Engineering Department. 4. Landscaping planted along the trail shall be located on the east side of the trail pathway, between the pathway and the perimeter wall of the subdivision. 5. A copy of the final design of the Community Trail shall be provided to the Planning Department for the file record. Staff Planner: Mike Smith, Associate Planner Attachments: A—Trails Exhibit B—Arial Map C—Correspondence from Southern California Edison (SCE) D—Conceptual Trail Cross Section Exhibit E—Copy of Pians • Trails Advhwry Committee Action: • Item G 103 STAFF REPORT PIANNINGDEPARITENr Date: July 10, 2013 RANCHO To: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission C,UCAMONGA From: Candyce Burnett, Planning Manager By: Mike Smith, Associate Planner Subject: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18870- LENNAR HOMES OF CALIFORNIA - A request to subdivide a vacant parcel of about 3,047,814 square feet (79.87 acres) into 291 lots and eleven (11) lettered lots within the Low Medium (LM) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan (South Overlay), located about 525 feet east of Etiwanda Avenue at the north side of Arrow Route - APN: 0229-041-09. Related files: Development Review DRC2012-01202 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00483. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2013-00483 - LENNAR HOMES OF CALIFORNIA - A request to remove trees in conjunction with a proposal to subdivide a vacant parcel of about 3,047,814 square feet (79.87 acres) into 291 lots and eleven (11) lettered lots within the Low Medium (LM) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan (South Overlay), located about • 525 feet east of Etiwanda Avenue at the north side of Arrow Route - APN: 0229-041-09. Related file: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18870 and Development Review DRC2012-01202. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18870 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00483 by adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval with conditions. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surroundina Land Use and Zonina: North - Mutti-Famiy Apartment Complex; Medium (M) Residential District, Foothill Boulevard Overlay Zoning District (Subarea 4) South- Varies; General Industrial (GI) District East - Etiwanda/San Sevaine Flood Control Channel; Floodway (FW) (unincorporated San Bernardino County) West - Single-Family Residences/Multi-Family Apartment Complex; Low (L), Low Medium (LM), and Medium (M) Residential Districts, Etiwanda Specific Plan (South Overlay) B. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Low Medium Residential and Flood Control/Utility Corridor North - Low Medium South- General Industrial East - n/a (unincorporated San Bernardino County) West - Low and Medium C. Site Characteristics: The project site is a vacant parcel located about 525 feet east of Etiwanda Avenue at the north side of Arrow Route (Exhibit B). The project site is an %H1131T K Item G 104 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT18870 AND DRC2013-00 —LENNAR HOMES OF CALIFORNIA July 10, 2013 Page 2 . irregularly-shaped vacant parcel with an overall area of about 3.5 million square feet (80.8 acres). The site is approximately 1,900 feet deep (north to south); because of its irregular shape, it is approximately 1,300 feet wide (east to west) at the north property line and approximately 2,100 feet wide at the south property line. There is a 'dog leg' extension that is approximately 232 feet in width and 688 feet in length at the northwest corner of the property that extends to Foothill Boulevard. The project site was previously used by Ameron, a concrete pipe manufacturer located nearby at the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Arrow Route, for outdoor storage (of, for example, finished pipe segments). To the west of the project site are the Victoria Woods apartment complex and a single-family residential subdivision. To the north is the San Sevaine Villas apartment complex. Immediately to the east, and parallel to the east property line of the project site, is the Etiwanda/San Sevaine flood control channel. To the south are legal, non-conforming single-family residences, industrial uses (principally outdoor storage), and several vacant parcels. Principal street frontage will be along Arrow Route with a length of approximately 2,100 feet. Secondary street frontage will be along Foothill Boulevard with a length of approximately 232 feet(at the north end of the aforementioned 'dog leg'). Within the project site is a corridor comprised of easements in favor of Southem California Edison (SCE) and Southern California Gas Company (SCGC), and associated improvements such as transmission lines. This corridor is located parallel to the west property line of the project site and is approximately 22 acres in area. The 'dog leg' portion of the property is entirely within this corridor. Because of the presence of this utility corridor, the actual area of the project site that is available for development is approximately 64 acres. The zoning of the majority of the site is Low Medium (LM) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan (South Overlay); the portion of the site that is within the utility corridor described above is zoned Open Space (OS) District. The zoning of • the properties to the west beyond the utility corridor are Low (L), Low Medium (LM), and Medium (M) Residential Districts, Etiwanda Specific Plan (South Overlay). The zoning of the property to the north is Medium (M) Residential District, Foothill Boulevard Overlay Zoning District (Subarea 4). The zoning of the properties to the south is General Industrial (GI) District. The zoning of the flood control channel to the east is Floodway (FW) (unincorporated San Bernardino County). The subject property is generally level with an elevation at the north and south sides of approximately 1,180 feet and 1,155 feet, respectively. ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant proposes to subdivide the property into 291 numbered lots for a private (gated) single-family residential development (Exhibit D and E). There will be an additional eleven (11) lettered lots for an existing, unrelated Southern Gas Company facility (Lot A) and common areas as follows: open space along the Arrow Route street frontage (Lots B, C, and D); two private parks (Lots E and F); pedestrian access pathways (Lots G and H), and private streets (Lot 1). All lots will comply with the development standards applicable to this zoning district as described in Figure 5-2 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Individual lot areas will range between 5,000 square feet to 13,450 square feet which are in excess of the minimum of 5,000 square feet that is required. The minimum average lot area is 6,738 square feet which is in excess of the minimum 6,000 square feet that is required. The depth of each lot will be at least 90 feet, and the width of each lot at the required front setback will be at least 50 feet (with 50 percent of the lots being a minimum of 55 feet in width as required by the Etiwanda Speck Plan). Included in the proposal is a network of private streets and two (2) gated entrances that will link the site to Arrow Route. As streets are not permitted within the utility corridor, there will not be any vehicle access directly to Foothill Boulevard. • Item G 105 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT18870 AND DRC2013-00483—LENNAR HOMES OF CALIFORNIA • July 10, 2013 Page 3 Along the south side of the project site, along the Arrow Route street frontage, there will be a series of community entry monument signs, decorative vehicle gates, omate wood trellis structures, and extensive landscaping. In addition to aesthetically enhancing the entrance into the project site, these features will, in combination with a continuous perimeter block wall, buffer the project site from existing/potential industrial land uses on the properties on the south side of Arrow Route. Two private parks are proposed within the interior of the subdivision. These parks will include typical playground equipment, open lawn areas, benches, and decorative entry trellises (Exhibit G). Within the utility corridor a 20-foot wide trail will be constructed per Figure CS-3—Hiking and Riding Trails Master Plan — of the General Plan. This trail will be a part of the Community Trail network. The alignment of this trail will extend from Arrow Route to Foothill Boulevard. Per the General Plan, Arrow Route will be the south terminus of the trail, i.e. the trail will not continue further south. At Foothill Boulevard, the trail will eventually connect with the trail segment that will be constructed by others in conjunction with future development on the other side of the street. It will be located generally adjacent, and parallel, to the eastern limit of the utility corridor and the rear property lines of proposed Lots 1 through 21, 138, 137, and 141 through 146 (Exhibit A of Exhibit 1). The total length of the trail will be approximately 2,700 feet. Two (2) pedestrian connections, with decorative features such as overhead trellises, will link the subdivision to the Community Trail. These connections are located between Lots 20 and 21, and Lots 1 and 137 (identified as Lots G and H, respectively). Based on separate meetings with representatives of SCE and SCGC, as the trail will be located within the overlapping easements of both utilities where infrastructure is present (SCE transmission towers and lines above-ground and a SCGC pipeline below ground), the design of the trail will be subject to their authority and restrictions (Exhibit C of Exhibit 1). Trail-related • improvements such as fences, light standards, landscaping, etc. that are typically required for Community Trails may be very limited or not present altogether along this segment of the Community Trail system. The applicant and the City's Engineering Services Department are currently in negotiations with SCE for the construction of a master storm drain (to mitigate incremental water runoff from the project site) within a segment of the utility corridor that is located "downstream', i.e. to the south of the project site. As SCE has easement rights within the corridor, SCE may deny or delay the installation of the storm drain. In the event that this occurs, the construction of alternate drainage improvements, including an interim detention basin, may be required. The interim detention basin will be located at the southwest area of the project site at Lots 144 through 153 (Sheet 2 of Exhibit D). Grading and construction of the proposed homes for those lots, as a result, will be postponed. All costs associated with the construction of the detention basin will be bome by the developer and maintenance will be provided by the homeowners association. Temporary detention basins for similar reasons are not uncommon; as with other detention basins that are located within other subdivisions in the City, a wrought iron fence and landscaping will be provided along the perimeter of this potential detention basin. B. Development Review DRC2012-01202: In conjunction with the tentative tract map, the applicant proposes to construct a single-family residence on each lot for a total of 291 single-family residences. As the Design Review Committee did not accept the architecture of the homes as proposed (further discussed below), the Planning Commission public hearing for the development review application will occur at a later, regularly scheduled date. C. Neighborhood Meeting: A neighborhood meeting was conducted to gather input and comments from the owners of the surrounding properties within 660 feet of the project site. This meeting was • Item G 106 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT18870 AND DRC20l a-W483—LENNAR HOMES OF CALIFORNIA July 10, 2013 Page 4 • held at Perdew Elementary School located at 13051 Miller Avenue on April 29, 2013. Three individuals from the surrounding community attended. None of them had any specific objections to the project and generally attended for the purpose of obtaining information such as construction schedules and home prices. D. Grading and Technical Review Committees: The Grading Review Committee (Addington and Miller) and Technical Review Committee reviewed the application on April 30, 2013. The Committees accepted the proposal and recommends approval. Their conditions have been incorporated into the Resolution of Approval. E. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee (Fletcher, Oaxaca, and Granger) reviewed the application on April 30, 2013 (Exhibit H). Staff presented a brief overview of the project and summarized the major/secondary issues relating to the architecture and site development. During the presentation Staff noted that the content and direction of the report prepared for this meeting took into consideration the feedback that was received by staff during the Planning Commission's Design Workshop held on April 10, 2013. The Committee reviewed the subdivision layout, private open space/landscaping design, and architecture of the homes. The architecture was generally considered to be unacceptable. The Committee directed the applicant to extensively revise the architecture of the houses. When the revised proposal is ready, the applicant will resubmit it to the Committee for review and action at a later, regularly scheduled meeting. The Committee accepted the subdivision layout and private open space/landscaping as proposed and recommends approval. Their conditions that apply to the tentative tract map have been incorporated into the Resolution of Approval. F. Trails Advisory Committee: The Trails Advisory Committee reviewed the application on • May 8, 2013 (Exhibit 1). The Committee acknowledged that there are significant design constraints that apply to the proposed segment of the Community Trail because of it's alignment within the utility corridor and the authority/restrictions of Southern California Edison and Southern California Gas Company. The Committee accepted the proposal and recommends approval. Their conditions have been incorporated into the Resolution of Approval. G. Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00483: The proposed project includes the removal of nine (9) Southern California black walnut trees that are at various locations within the project site (Exhibit J). The applicant has submitted a Tree Removal Permit for the removal of these trees. It is necessary to remove the trees in order to grade the site, and construct future single-family residences and associated improvements which will allow economic enjoyment of the property. Replacement trees of a minimum size of 15 gallons will be required to be planted on a one-to-one basis elsewhere within the project site. H. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA'� and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, Staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures related to, for example, air quality (including greenhouse gases), biological resources, hydrology/water quality, and noise there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation measures for the project. • Item G 107 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT18870 AND DRC2013-00483—LENNAR HOMES OF CALIFORNIA • July 10, 2013 Page 5 CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. No correspondence has been received. Respectfully submitted, C4 �J V Candyce Wriett Planning Manager CB:MS/ge Attachments: Exhibit A - Location Map Exhibit B - Aerial Photo Exhibit C - Site Utilization Map Exhibit D - Site Plan Exhibit E - Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18870 Exhibit F - Conceptual Grading Plan and Sections Exhibit G - Conceptual Landscape/Entry/Private Park Plans and Wall/Fence Elevations Exhibit H - Design Review Committee Action Comments (April 30, 2013) Exhibit I - Trails Advisory Committee Action Comments (May 8, 2013) • Exhibit J - Tree Removal Permit Locations Exhibit K - Initial Study Parts I and II Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18870 Draft Resolution of Approval for Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00483 • Item G 108 RESOLUTION NO. 13-26 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA,APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18870,A REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE A VACANT PARCEL OF ABOUT 3,047,614 SQUARE FEET (79.67 ACRES) INTO 291 LOTS AND ELEVEN (11) LETTERED LOTS WITHIN THE LOW MEDIUM (LM) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN (SOUTH OVERLAY), LOCATED ABOUT 525 FEET EAST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE AT THE NORTH SIDE OF ARROW ROUTE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF—APN: 0229-041-09. A. Recitals. 1. Lennar Homes of California filed an application for the issuance of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18870, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution,the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as"the application." 2. On the 10th day of July 2013 the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the • Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting on July 10, 2013, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a vacant parcel located approximately 525 feet east of Etiwanda Avenue at the north side of Arrow Route; and b. The project site is an irregularly shaped vacant parcel with an overall area of approximately 3.5 million square feet(80.8 acres). The site is approximately 1,900 feet deep(north to south); because of its irregular shape, it is approximately 1,300 feet wide (east to west) at the north property line and approximately 2,100 feet wide at the south property line. There is a"dog leg" extension that is approximately 232 feet in width and 688 feet in length at the northwest corner of the property that extends to Foothill Boulevard; and C. To the west of the project site are the Victoria Woods apartment complex and a single-family residential subdivision. To the north is the San Sevaine Villas apartment complex. Immediately to the east, and parallel to the east property line of the project site, is the Etiwanda/San Sevaine flood control channel. To the south are legal, non-conforming single-family residences, industrial uses (principally outdoor storage), and several vacant parcels; and • Item G 109 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-26 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18870— LENNAR HOMES OF CALIFORNIA July 10, 2013 Page 2 d. Within the project site is a utility corridor comprised of easements in favor of • Southern California Edison(SCE)and Southern California Gas Company(SCGC), and associated improvements such as transmission lines. This corridor is located parallel to the west property line of the project site and is approximately 22 acres in area. The "dog leg" portion of the property is entirely within this corridor; and e. The zoning of the majority of the site is Low Medium (LM) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan (South Overlay); the portion of the site that is within the utility corridor is zoned Open Space(OS) District. The zoning of the properties to the west beyond the utility corridor are Low(L), Low Medium(LM),and Medium(M)Residential Districts, Etiwanda Speck Plan(South Overlay). The zoning of the property to the north is Medium (M) Residential District, Foothill Boulevard Overlay Zoning District(Subarea 4). The zoning of the properties to the south is General Industrial (GI) District. The zoning of the flood control channel to the east is Floodway (FW) (unincorporated San Bernardino County); and f. The proposal is to subdivide the property into 291 numbered lots for a private (gated)single-family residential development. There will be an additional eleven(11)lettered lots for an existing, unrelated Southern Gas Company facility (Lot A) and common areas as follows: open space along the Arrow Route street frontage(Lots B, C, and D); two private parks (Lots E and F); pedestrian access pathways (Lots G and H), and private streets(Lot 1); and g. All lots will comply with the development standards applicable to this zoning district as described in Figure 5-2 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Individual lot areas will range between 5,000 square feet to 13,450 square feet,which are in excess of the minimum of 5,000 square feet that is required. The minimum average lot area is 6,738 square feet, which is in excess of the • minimum 6,000 that is required; and h. The applicant submitted Development Review DRC2012-01202, a review of the architecture for the proposed single-family homes that are to be constructed with the subject tentative tract map. As the Design Review Committee did not accept the architecture of the homes as proposed and directed the applicant to revise the proposal, the Planning Commission public hearing for the development review application will occur separately at a later, regularly scheduled date; and i. This application is in conjunction with Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00483. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed subdivision is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code and the Etiwanda Specific Plan, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The proposal is to subdivide a property with an area of approximately 3.5 million square feet (80.8 acres) into 291 numbered lots and eleven (11) lettered lots for a private (gated) single-family residential development. The underlying General Plan designation is Low Medium (LM) Residential. b. The proposed development,together with the conditions applicable thereto,will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The project site is vacant; the proposed land use is consistent with the land uses within the vicinity where it is located and the expectations of the community. The zoning • Item G 110 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-26 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18870—LENNAR HOMES OF CALIFORNIA July 10, 2013 Page 3 . of the majority of the site is Low Medium (LM) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan (South Overlay); the portion of the site that is within the utility corridor described above is zoned Open Space(OS) District. The zoning of the properties to the west beyond the utility corridor are Low(L), Low Medium (LM), and Medium (M) Residential Districts, Etiwanda Speck Plan (South Overlay). The zoning of the property to the north is Medium(M)Residential District, Foothill Boulevard Overlay Zoning District (Subarea 4). C. The proposed development complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code and the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The proposed development meets all standards outlined in the Development Code and the Etiwanda Specific Plan and the design and development standards and policies of the Planning Commission and the City. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration,together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA")and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that,with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative • Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i)that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii)that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Manager of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. • Item G 111 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-26 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18870— LENNAR HOMES OF CALIFORNIA July 10, 2013 Page 4 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, • this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) Approval is for the subdivision of a vacant parcel of about 3,047,614 square feet(79.67 acres)into 291 lots and eleven(11)lettered lots within the Low Medium (LM)Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan(South Overlay), located approximately 525 feet east of Etiwanda Avenue at the north side of Arrow Route-APN: 0229-041-09. 2) Development of all lots shall be in accordance with the standards and requirements applicable to the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (South Overlay) as described in Figure 5-2 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. 3) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, Etiwanda Specific Plan,State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances. 4) Prior to recordation of the Final Map, all lots shall be rough graded to include building pads and interim improvements (for example, drainage) as deemed necessary by the City. 5) The Community Trail and entry points at Arrow Route and Foothill • Boulevard shall be designed and constructed per the City Standard for Community Trails to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and Planning Manager. The design of the trail and associated improvements shall be coordinated with and are subject to the approval of Southern California Edison and the Southern California Gas Company. 6) A copy of any comments and/or corrections in response to plans submitted to SCE and SCGC shall be provided to the City for determination of alternate solutions, if necessary, and for the file record. 7) Install two (2)trees within the rear yard area of Lots 1 through 21, 138, 137, and 141 —through 146. The species and minimum box size of these trees shall match the tree requirements described in the City Standard applicable to Community Trails as established by the Engineering Services Department. 8) The landscaping planted along the trail shall be located on the east side of the trail pathway, between the pathway and the perimeter wall of the subdivision. 9) A copy of the final design of the Community Trail shall be provided to the Planning Department for the file record. • Item G 112 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-26 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18870—LENNAR HOMES OF CALIFORNIA July 10, 2013 Page 5 • 10) Prior to construction, all future homes and associated improvements shall require the review and approval by the City and the issuance of applicable Building Permits by the Building and Safety Services Department. The site plotting and architecture of these homes (and accessory structures) are subject to the review and approval of Development Review DRC2012-01202 by the Design Review Committee and Planning Commission. 11) All Conditions of Approval for Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00483 shall apply. Enaineerina Services Department 1) Arrow Route frontage improvements,extending from east City Limits to west edge of Edison easement (west property line), to be in accordance with Etiwanda Specific Plan "Major Arterial" standards as required and including: a) Provide curb and gutter, curvilinear sidewalk, street trees, curbside drain outlets, and access ramps as required. b) Construct asphalt pavement to the centerline of the street. c) Provide 9500 Lumen HPSV street lights as required. • d) Provide traffic striping and signage, as required. e) Provide R26(s) "No Stopping" signs as required. f) Dedication shall be made a total of 50 feet measured from street centerline of Arrow Route. g) Provide additional widening on the south side of Arrow Route sufficient to install a left-turn lane for the project entry. h) Provide off-site transition to the existing edge of pavement east of the east tract boundary to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. PermiVreview shall be processed by County of San Bernardino. i) The pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. 2) The interior private streets shall conform to City "Local Street" standards as required and including: a) Provide curb,gutter, sidewalk, street trees and drive approaches as required. b) Provide 5800 lumen HPSV street lights as required. • c) Provide traffic striping and signage as required. Item G 113 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-26 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18870— LENNAR HOMES OF CALIFORNIA July 10, 2013 Page 6 3) Widen the culvert over Etiwanda Creek. The developer will receive • Transportation and or Drainage Development Fee credit for widening the culvert to accommodate the ultimate "Major Arterial" full street width. 4) Install traffic signal at the intersection of Arrow Route and Pecan Avenue. 5) The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical except for the 66 kV electrical)on the project side of Arrow Route shall be undergrounded along the entire frontage,extending to the first pole off-site (east and west), prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy,whichever occurs first. All services crossing Arrow Route shall be undergrounded at the same time. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development (or redevelopment) as k occurs on the opposite side of the street. If the developer fails to submit said reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public improvements being accepted by the City,all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. a) The City shall provide the collected monies from the developer on the south side of Arrow Route, east of Pecan Avenue, DRC2006-00692, paid for as an in-lieu fee for future • undergrounding of said overhead utilities. 6) All gated accesses shall conform to the City's "Residential Project Gated Entrance Design Guide'. 7) Development shall apply for Southern California Edison Company and Southern California Gas Company permits for the construction of the Community Trail. a) Construct Community Trail per City Standards. 8) Developer will be required to complete master storm drain improvements per the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Drainage Policy or provide aftemative drainage facilities subject to the approval of the City Engineer. The developer shall make a good faith effort to obtain all the necessary storm drain easements from the affected property owners, south of Arrow Route and if he/she should fail to do so, the developer shall, at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final map for approval, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code Sections 66462 and 66462.5 at such time as the City decides to acquire the property interests required for the improvements. Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developer of all costs incurred by the City if the City decides to acquire the off-site property interests required in connection with the subdivision. Security for a portion of these costs shall be in the form of • a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by Item G 114 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-26 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18870— LENNAR HOMES OF CALIFORNIA July 10, 2013 Page 7 • the City, at developer's cost. The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal. This condition applies in particular,but not limited to: Construction of the Master Plan Storm Drain Area No. 10 Lines XVI-1b & 2 from the Project Site to south of Whittram Avenue. a) Development shall apply for SCE permit for construction of Master Plan Storm Drain within its easement. 9) Master Plan Line XVI-1 b& 2 is eligible for fee crediUreimbursement in accordance with the City Policy. In addition, reconstruction of Whittram Avenue crossing is eligible for Transportation Fee credit/reimbursement. 10) Since this is a private gated community, the homeowners association will maintain all frontage landscaping, including street trees. Private landscaping along Arrow Route frontage shall reflect line-of-sight designs for all project driveways. 11) An in-lieu fee as contribution for the future installation of the median island and landscaping on Foothill Boulevard from the existing median to the east per City Drawing 2255-L to Cornwall Avenue. The fee shall be one-half the City adopted unit amount times the length of the project frontage. • a) The developer shall also pay a fair share for any frontage portions installed by others. 12) An in-lieu fee as contribution for the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical, except for the 66 kV electrical)on the opposite side of Foothill Boulevard shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of Building Permits. The fee shall be one-half the City adopted unit amount times the length of the Foothill Boulevard property frontage. Environmental Mitigation Air Quality 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers'specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits,the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be • utilized,or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction Item G 115 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-26 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18870— LENNAR HOMES OF CALIFORNIA July 10, 2013 Page 8 measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District • (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if • silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds(i.e.,wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB])daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter(PM10)emissions,in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. is Item G 116 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-26 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18870— LENNAR HOMES OF CALIFORNIA July 10, 2013 . Page 9 10) Landscape with native and/or drought-resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 11) Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planting programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC-01 measure. 12) All residential structures shall be required to incorporate high- efficiency/low-polluting heating,air conditioning,appliances, and water heaters. 13) All residential structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. 14) All new development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District's Rule 445, Wood Burning Devices. Rule 445 was adopted in March 2008 to reduce emissions of PM2,5 and precludes the installation of indoor or outdoor wood burning devices (i.e. fireplaces/hearths) in new development on or after March 9, 2009. Biological Resources 1) The applicant shall purchase at a 1:1 ratio 4.8 acres of Riversidean • alluvial fan sage scrub(RAFSS)habitat designated for conservation or pay in-lieu fees. Evidence of applicable mitigation agreements approved by California Department of Fish and Wildlife(CDFW)shall be submitted to the City prior to issuance of grading permits. 2) Trees that are removed shall be replaced on a one-to-one basis with a matching species of a minimum 15-gallon size. 3) Burrowing owl mitigation: a) Avoidance during the breeding season - Breeding season avoidance measures, including but not limited to those as follows shall be implemented. A pre-construction survey for resident burrowing owls shall be conducted by a qualified biologist within 30 days prior to construction activities. If ground-disturbing activities are delayed or suspended for more than 30 days after the pre-construction survey, the site will be resurveyed for owls. Pre-construction survey methodology shall be based on Appendix D (Breeding and Non-breeding Season Surveys and Reports)of the CDFW Staff Report. Results of the pre-construction survey shall be provided to CDFW and the City. If the pre-construction survey does not identify burrowing owls on the project site, then no further mitigation would be required. If burrowing owls are found to be utilizing the project site during the pre-construction survey, measures shall be developed by the qualified biologist in • coordination with CDFW to avoid impacting occupied burrows during the nesting period.These measures shall be based on the Item G 117 l PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-26 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18870— LENNAR HOMES OF CALIFORNIA July 10, 2013 Page 10 most current CDFW protocols and would minimally include • establishment of buffer setbacks from occupied burrows and owl monitoring. b) Burrow exclusion and/or closure during the non-breeding season - During the non-breeding season (September 1 through January 31), if burrows occupied by migratory or non-migratory resident burrowing owls are detected during a pre-construction survey, then burrow exclusion and/or closure may be used to exclude owls from those burrows. Burrow exclusion and/or closure should only be conducted by a qualified wildlife biologist in coordination with CDFW using the most current CDFW guidelines. c) Nesting Birds - If vegetation removal, soil disturbance, or any other construction related activity is to occur during the avian nesting season (February 1 through August 31), a preconstruction nesting survey shall be conducted prior to initiation of construction. If nests are discovered, they should be avoided through establishment of an appropriate buffer setback, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. The temporary"no construction"area would have to be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and left the nest, then construction in the area could resume. If • initial ground disturbing activities or site clearing is proposed to occur outside of the nesting season (September 1 through January 31),then a preconstruction survey would not be required and construction could commence unimpeded. 4) Prior to approval by the City of any grading and/or construction permits, the applicant shall consult with the Army Corp of Engineers(Corps)to obtain an approved Jurisdictional Determination and, if necessary, acquire the applicable permits from the Corps and any applicable authorization(s) from the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board, the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, and/or the United States Fish and Wildlife Service. Copies of any correspondence and/or permits received shall be submitted to the City for review and record. Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities,to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Itr+m G Ila PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-26 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18870— LENNAR HOMES OF CALIFORNIA July 10, 2013 Page 11 • • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments,using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. • Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with Section 21083.2 Archaeological resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, including but not limited to, avoiding archaeological sites, capping or covering sites with soil, planning the site as a park or green space or paying an in-kind mitigation fee. • Prepare a technical resources management report,documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading,the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., • paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate,the program must include,but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. Geology and Soils 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent • (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB)daily to reduce PM10 emissions, Item G 119 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-26 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18870— LENNAR HOMES OF CALIFORNIA July 10, 2013 Page 12 in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought • resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM10 emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM10 emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. Greenhouse Gas Emissions 1) The project must comply with all rules that assist in reducing short-term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAQMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil-stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 2) The construction contractor shall select construction equipment based • on low-emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures specification. 3) Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 minutes. 4) Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline- or diesel-powered engines where feasible. 5) Construction should be timed so as not to interfere with peak-hour traffic. 6) Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be supported and encouraged for construction crew. 7) Construction and Building materials shall be produced and/or manufactured locally. Use "Green Building Materials" such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled, and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low-volatile-organic-compound (VOC) materials. 8) Design all buildings to exceed California Building Code Title 24 energy standard including, but not limited to, any combination of: Increased insulation, • Item G 120 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-26 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18870— LENNAR HOMES OF CALIFORNIA July 10, 2013 Page 13 • • Limit air leakage through the structure, • Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances, • Landscape and develop site utilizing shade, prevailing winds and landscaping, • Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems, • Install light colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements, • Install solar or light emitting diodes (LED's)for outdoor lighting. 9) Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and include the following: • Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. • Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available • and/or install the infrastructure to deliver and use reclaimed water. • Design buildings to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low-flow faucets, dual flush toilets, and waterless urinals/water heaters. • Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non-vegetated surfaces. 10) Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educate employees about reducing waste and about recycling. 11) To reduce energy consumption, the Project shall install Energy Star-rated appliances. Hydrology and Water Quality 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. • 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific Item G 121 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-26 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18870— LENNAR HOMES OF CALIFORNIA July 10, 2013 Page 14 measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground • disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by Dan Guerra & Associates on February 22, 2013,to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 6) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and • minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. 7) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 8) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent(NOI)to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System(NPDES)General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number)shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. • Item G 122 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-26 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18870—LENNAR HOMES OF CALIFORNIA July 10, 2013 Page 15 • Noise 1) For noise attenuation purposes, the applicant shall construct a 6-foot high block wall along the south perimeter of the project site. These walls shall be constructed of masonry block or other material of sufficient weight(3.5 pounds per square foot of face area)and have no decorative cutouts or line-of-sight openings between the project site and adjacent land uses. All gaps(except for weep holes)shall be filled with grout or caulking. These walls shall be fully constructed simultaneously with the development of the site and prior to occupancy of any of the homes on Lots 147-151, 174-183, 186-188, and 193-197. 2) Provide standard dual-glazed windows with a Sound Transmission Class (STC) rating of 26 or higher and a windows closed condition requiring a means of mechanical ventilation (e.g. air conditioning)for Lots 147-151, 174-183, 186-188, and 193-197. 3) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 4) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to perform • weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or hafted. 5) Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the Project Proponent shall submit a construction-related noise control plan to the City for review and approval, which demonstrates that construction or grading noise levels will not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Sections 17.66.050-C & 17.66.050-D.4.a. The Plan shall: depict the location of construction equipment staging areas; require that construction contractors equip construction equipment(fixed or mobile) with properly operating and maintained mufflers consistent with manufacturers' standards; require that the construction contractor place stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from noise sensitive receptors nearest the Project site; and describe other noise control measures that will be implemented during Project-related construction activities. The construction supervisor shall ensure compliance with the noise control plan and the City shall conduct periodic inspection at its discretion. • 6) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in the first phase. Item G 123 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-26 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18870–LENNAR HOMES OF CALIFORNIA July 10, 2013 Page 18 • 7) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally,if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips(counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF JULY 2013. PLANNING COMMISSION OFA T/HE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: —414ta 6 rances Howdyshell, Chairman ATTEST: A it Candyce ur e , ecretary • I, Candyce Bumett, Secretary of the Planning Commission for the City of Rancho Cucamonga,do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of July 2013, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: - FLETCHER,HOWDYSHELL,MUNOZ,OAXACA,WIMBERLY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: NONE • Item G 124 RESOLUTION NO. 13-45 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2012-01202, A REVIEW OF 291 SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES THAT WILL BE CONSTRUCTED IN CONJUNCTION WITH A PROPOSED SUBDIVISION OF A PARCEL OF APPROXIMATELY 3,047,614 SQUARE FEET (79.67 ACRES) WITHIN THE LOW MEDIUM (LM) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN (SOUTH OVERLAY), LOCATED ABOUT 525 FEET EAST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE AT THE NORTH SIDE OF ARROW ROUTE;AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF— APN: 0229-041-09. A. Recitals. 1. Lennar Homes of California filed an application for the issuance of Development Review DRC2012-01202, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 23rd day of October 2013, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. • NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on October 23, 2013, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a vacant parcel located approximately 525 feet east of Etiwanda Avenue at the north side of Arrow Route; and b. The project site is an irregularly-shaped vacant parcel with an overall area of approximately 3.5 million square feet(80.8 acres). The site is approximately 1,900 feet deep(north to south); because of its irregular shape, it is approximately 1,300 feet wide (east to west) at the north property line and approximately 2,100 feet wide at the south property line. There is a"dog leg" extension that is approximately 232 feet in width and 688 feet in length at the northwest corner of the property that extends to Foothill Boulevard; and C. To the west of the project site are the Victoria Woods apartment complex and a single-family residential subdivision. To the north is the San Sevaine Villas apartment complex. Immediately to the east, and parallel to the east property line of the project site, is the Etiwanda/San Sevaine flood control channel. To the south are legal, non-conforming single-family residences, industrial uses (principally outdoor storage), and several vacant parcels; and • Item G 125 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-45 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2012-01202— LENNAR HOMES OF CALIFORNIA October 23, 2013 Page 2 d. Within the project site is a utility corridor comprised of easements in favor of • Southern California Edison(SCE)and Southern California Gas Company(SCGC), and associated improvements such as transmission lines. This corridor is located parallel to the west property line of the project site and is approximately 22 acres in area. The "dog leg" portion of the property is entirely within this corridor; and e. The zoning of the majority of the site is Low Medium (LM) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan (South Overlay); the portion of the site that is within the utility corridor is zoned Open Space(OS)District. The zoning of the properties to the west beyond the utility corridor are Low (L), Low Medium (LM), and Medium (M) Residential Districts, Etiwanda Specific Plan (South Overlay). The zoning of the property to the north is Medium (M) Residential District, Foothill Boulevard Overlay Zoning District(Subarea 4). The zoning of the properties to the south is General Industrial(GI) District. The zoning of the flood control channel to the east is Floodway(FW) (unincorporated San Bernardino County); and f. The proposal is to construct a single-family residence on each lot of a 291-lot subdivision (Related file: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18870),that was previously approved by the Planning Commission on July 10, 2013, for a total of 291 single-family residences; and g. The applicant proposes thirteen (13)distinct footprints—Plans 55(1 -4),65(1 -4), and 70(1 -5)—and reverse footprints of each for a total of twenty-six(26)footprints. The number of available footprints will comply with Figure 5-45 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan; and h. Plans 55-1,65-1,70-1, and 70-2, and 43 will be single-story,while the remainder of the lots will be two-story. The mix of one-and two-story homes is consistent with the policy adopted • by the Planning Commission requiring that 25 percent(minimum) of the proposed houses must be single-story. The houses on all corner lots will be single-story as required per Section 5.42.608 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan; and i. The project will comply with Section 5.42.606 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan that requires that 50 percent of the garages to be oriented or situated in a manner that minimizes the visual presence of the garage; and j. The proposed houses will comply with the development standards applicable to this zoning district as described in Figure 5-2 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The architecture of each house will be consistent with the general design requirements outlined in the Development Code and the Etiwanda Specific Plan. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed development is in accord with the General Plan,the objectives of the Development Code and the Etiwanda Specific Plan, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The proposal is to construct a single-family residence on each lot of a 291-lot subdivision (Related file: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18446), that was previously approved by the Planning Commission on July 10, 2013, for a total of 291 single-family residences. The underlying General Plan designation is Low Medium Residential. b. The proposed development,togetherwith the conditions applicable thereto,will not • be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or Item G 126 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1345 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2012-01202 — LENNAR HOMES OF CALIFORNIA October 23, 2013 • Page 3 improvements in the vicinity. The project site is vacant;the proposed land use is consistent with the land uses within the vicinity where it is located and the expectations of the community. The zoning of the majority of the site is Low Medium (LM) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan (South Overlay); the portion of the site that is within the utility corridor described above is zoned Open Space(OS) District. The zoning of the properties to the west beyond the utility corridor are Low(L), Low Medium (LM), and Medium (M) Residential Districts, Etiwanda Specific Plan (South Overlay). The zoning of the property to the north is Medium(M)Residential District, Foothill Boulevard Overlay Zoning District (Subarea 4). C. The proposed development complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code and the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The proposed development meets all standards outlined in the Development Code and the Etiwanda Specific Plan and the design and development standards and policies of the Planning Commission and the City. 4. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA")and the City's local CEQA Guidelines,the City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration on July 10, 2013 in connection with the City's approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18870. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project. No substantial changes are proposed to the project that indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment; no substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicates new or more severe environmental impacts; no new important information shows the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered; and no • additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts. There have been no substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previous Negative Declaration. Staff further finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Negative Declaration, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less-than-significant. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) Approval is for the development of 291 single-family residences in conjunction with a previously approved 291-lot subdivision of a parcel of about 3,047,614 square feet (79.67-acres) within the Low Medium (LM) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan (South Overlay), located approximately 525 feet east of Etiwanda Avenue at the north side of Arrow Route-APN: 1100-131-01. 2) Development of all lots shall be in accordance with the standards and requirements applicable to the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (South Overlay) as described in Figure 5-2 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. • Item G 127 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-45 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2012-01202— LENNAR HOMES OF CALIFORNIA October 23, 2013 Page 4 3) The molding along the top of the stone or brick veneer wainscots shall • also be stone or brick, not foam. 4) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, Etiwanda Specific Plan, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances. 5) Model homes shall require the review of a separate Temporary Use Permit (Model Home) and fee prior to the submittal of documents for plan check and construction. Note: Parking in the street will not be permitted for this purpose. A temporary off-street parking area that complies with all applicable parking requirements will be required and must be shown on the plans for this permit. 6) All Conditions of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18870 (including all Mitigation Measures for associated Mitigated Negative Declaration) and Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00483 shall apply. Engineering Services Department 1) Arrow Route frontage improvements, extending from east City Limits to the west edge of Edison easement (west property line), to be in accordance with Etiwanda Specific Plan "Major Arterial" standards as required and including: a) Provide curb and gutter, curvilinear sidewalk, street trees, • curbside drain outlets, and access ramps as required. b) Construct asphalt pavement to the centerline of the street. c) Provide 9500 Lumen HPSV street lights as required. d) Provide traffic striping and signage, as required. e) Provide R26(s) "No Stopping" signs as required. f) Dedication shall be made a total of 50 feet measured from the street centerline of Arrow Route. g) Provide additional widening on the south side of Arrow Route sufficient to install a left-turn lane for the project entry. h) Provide off-site transition to the existing edge of pavement east of the east tract boundary to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Permit/review shall be processed by County of San Bernardino. i) The pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. 2) The interior private streets shall conform to City "Local Street" • standards as required and including: Item G 128 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-45 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2012-01202—LENNAR HOMES OF CALIFORNIA October 23, 2013 • Page 5 a) Provide curb,gutter, sidewalk, street trees and drive approaches as required. b) Provide 5800 Lumen HPSV street lights as required. c) Provide traffic striping and signage as required. 3) Widen the culvert over Etiwanda Creek. The developer will receive Transportation and or Drainage Development Fee credit for widening the culvert to accommodate the ultimate "Major Arterial" full street width. 4) Install traffic signal at the intersection of Arrow Route and Pecan Avenue. 5) The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical except for the 66 kV electrical)on the project side of Arrow Route shall be undergrounded along the entire frontage,extending to the first pole off-site (east and west), prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy,whichever occurs first. All services crossing Arrow Route shall be undergrounded at the same time. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City adopted cost • for undergrounding from future development (or redevelopment) as it occurs on the opposite side of the street. If the developer fails to submit said reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. a) The City shall provide the collected monies from the developer on the south side of Arrow Route, east of Pecan Avenue, DRC2006-00692, paid for as an in-lieu fee for future undergrounding of said overhead utilities. 6) All gated accesses shall conform to the City's "Residential Project Gated Entrance Design Guide." 7) The developer shall apply for Southern California Edison Company (SCE) and Southern California Gas Company permits for the construction of the Community Trail. a) Construct the Community Trail per the City Standards. 8) The developer will be required to complete the master storm drain improvements per the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Drainage Policy or provide alternative drainage facilities subject to the approval of the City Engineer. The developer shall make a good faith effort to obtain all the necessary storm drain easements from the affected property owners, south of Arrow Route and if he/she should fail to do so, the developer • shall, at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final map for approval, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Itpm G 12q PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-45 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2012-01202 — LENNAR HOMES OF CALIFORNIA October 23, 2013 Page 6 Government Code Sections 66462 and 66462.5 at such time as the • City decides to acquire the property interests required for the improvements. Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developer of all costs incurred by the City if the City decides to acquire the off-site property interests required in connection with the subdivision. Security for a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the City, at developer's cost. The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal. This condition applies in particular, but not limited to: Construction of the Master Plan Storm Drain Area No 10 Lines XVI-1b & 2 from the Project Site to south of Whittram Avenue. a) The developer shall apply fora SCE permit for the construction of a Master Plan Storm Drain within its easement. 9) Master Plan Line XVI-1 b &2 is eligible for fee credit/reimbursement in accordance with the City Policy. In addition, reconstruction of Whittram Avenue crossing is eligible for Transportation Fee credit/reimbursement. 10) Since this is a private gated community, the homeowners association will maintain all frontage landscaping, including street trees. Private landscaping along Arrow Route frontage shall reflect line-of-sight designs for all project driveways. • 11) An in-lieu fee as contribution for the future installation of the median island and landscaping on Foothill Boulevard from the existing median to the east per City Drawing 2255-L to Cornwall Avenue. The fee shall be one-half the City adopted unit amount times the length of the project frontage. a) The developer shall also pay a fair share for any frontage portions installed by others. An in-lieu fee as contribution for the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical, except for the 66 kV electrical) on the opposite side of Foothill Boulevard shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of Building Permits. The fee shall be one-half the City adopted unit amount times the length of the Foothill Boulevard property frontage. • Item G 130 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-45 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2012-01202— LENNAR HOMES OF CALIFORNIA October 23, 2013 • Page 7 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF OCTOBER 2013. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Frances Howdyshell, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed,and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 23rd day of October 2013, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: • ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: • Itam C 111 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT#: DRC2012-01202 SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICANT: LENNAR HOMES OF CALIFORNIA APPROXIMATELY 525 FEET EAST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE AT THE NORTH SIDE OF LOCATION: ARROW ROUTE-APN: 0229-041-09. ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General Requirements Completion Date 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. 13-45 or Approval Letter, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. B. Time Limits 1. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign • program, and grading on Ile in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, the Development Code regulations, and the Etiwanda Specific Plan. 1 Itpm C; 117 Project No. DRC2012-01202 Completion Date 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager. 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building _/_/_ • Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Services Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance and final acceptance granted prior to occupancy. 4. Revised Site Plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Planning Manager review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 7. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. B. Street names shall be submitted for Planning Manager review and approval in accordance with the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map 9. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, _/_/_ • including proper illumination and in conformance with Building and Safety Services Department standards, the Municipal Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department (RCFD)Standards. 10. A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing, and weed control, in accordance with City Master Trail drawings, shall be submitted for Planning Manager review and approval prior to approval and recordation of the Final Tract Map and prior to approval of street improvement and grading plans. Developer shall upgrade and construct all trails, including fencing and drainage devices, in conjunction with street improvements. 11. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Manager and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 12. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for Planning Manager and Engineering Services Department approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. 13. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owners at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/fences along the project perimeter. 2 • Item G 133 Project No. DRC2012-01202 Completion Date 14. Construct block walls between homes (i.e., along interior side and rear property lines), • rather than wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency. 15. Access gates to the rear yards shall be constructed from a material more durable than wood gates. Acceptable materials include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC. 16. For residential development, return walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry. _/—/- 17. On corner side yards, provide minimum 5-foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk. The 5-foot wall/fence setback and the parkway shall have landscape and irrigation in addition to the required street trees. Detailed landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning Manager review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. The parkway landscaping including trees, shrubs, ground covers and irrigation shall be maintained by the property owner. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the parkway maintenance requirement, in a standard format as determined by the Planning Manager, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 18. Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock. Other stone veneers may be --- manufactured products. products. D. SHOPPING CENTERS 1. Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours. —/—/- 2. The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and in no event shall trash and debris remain for more than 24 hours. E. Building Design • 1. For all residential development, provide conduit from each unit/lot and a pull box to connect to the street. Provide interior structured wiring for each house/building with minimum Category 5 copper wire, Radio Grade 6 coaxial cable, and a central distribution panel, prior to release of occupancy (fiber-to-the building, FTTB). Plans shall be submitted for Planning Manager and Building Official review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. F. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1. Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the Planning Manager, City Engineer, and Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. For residential development, private gated entrances shall provide adequate turn-around space in front of the gate and a separate visitor lane with call box to avoid cars stacking into the public right-of-way. G. Landscaping 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Manager review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. For development occurring in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, the landscape plans will also be reviewed by Fire Construction Services. 2. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, • 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope 3 Itpm r, 114 Project No. DRC2012-01202 Completion Date shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed • by the developer prior to occupancy. 3. For single-family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Department to determine that they are in satisfactory condition. 4. Front yard and corner side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be required per the Development Code and/or Etiwanda Specific Plan. This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting. 5. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Manager review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Services Department. 6. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 7. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Services Department. 8. Landscaping and Irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water efficient landscaping per Development Code Chapter 17.82. H. Signs • 1. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs. I. Environmental 1. Noise levels shall be monitored after construction to verity the adequacy of the mitigation measures. Noise levels shall be monitored by actual noise level readings taken on-and off- site. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for Planning Manager review and approval prior to final occupancy release. The final report shall also make recommendations as to additional mitigation measures to reduce noise levels to below City standards, such as, residential exterior noise levels to below 60 dBA and interior noise attenuation to below 45 dBA. J. Other Agencies 1. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to Planning Manager review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. • 4 Item f. 1:15 Project No. DRC2012-01202 Completion Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY SERVICES DEPARTMENT, 9 09) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: :NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S). K. Building and Safety Single-Family Residential Standard Conditions General Requirements 1. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan and reverse foundation plan (when applicable); c. Floor Plan; d. Roof and Floor Framing Plan and reverse Roof and Floor Framing Plan (when applicable); e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and g. Planning Department Project Number (DRC2012-01202) clearly identified on the outside of all plans. 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, two sets of energy conservation calculations, and —/_/— • a soils report. Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation —/—/— coverage to the City prior to permit issuance. 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. Site Development 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall —/—/— be marked with the project file number (DRC2012-01202). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Services Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to the issuance of Building Permits for a new residential project or major addition, the _/—/— applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, and School Fees. The applicant shall provide a copy of the School Fees receipt to the Building and Safety Services Department prior to permit Issuance. 3. The Building and Safety Official shall provide street addresses after tract/parcel map _/—/— recordation and prior to issuance of Building Permits. 4. Construction activity shall occur in accordance with the standards as stated in Chapter • 17.66.050 D-4 of the Development Code. 5 Itom r. 17fi Project No. DRC2012-01202 Completion Date New Structures 1. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances —�—�— • considering use, area, and fire-resistive requirements. 2. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. 3. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's"high wind" instructions. 4. The The home must be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers in accordance with NFPA 13D. 5. Annexation Annexation of the parcel: Annexation of the parcel into the Community Facilities District #85-1 or#88-1 is required prior to the issuance of grading or Building Permits. L. Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The grading and drainage plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual grading and drainage plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 3. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or engineering geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 4. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall —f_�— • be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 5. As a custom-lot subdivision, the following requirements shall be met: a. Surety Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed guaranteeing completion of all on- site drainage facilities necessary for dewatering all parcels to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Official prior to final map approval and prior to the issuance of Grading Permits. b. Appropriate easements for safe disposal of drainage water that are conducted onto or over adjacent parcels, are to be delineated and recorded to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of grading and Building Permits. C. On-site drainage improvements, necessary for dewatering and protecting the subdivided properties,properties, are to be installed prior to issuance of Building Permits for construction upon any parcel that may be subject to drainage Flows entering, leaving, or within a parcel relative to which a Building Permit is requested. d. Final grading plans for each parcel are to be submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department for approval prior to the issuance of grading and Building Permits (this may be on an incremental or composite basis). e. All slope banks in excess of 5 feet in vertical height shall be seeded with native grasses or planted with ground cover for erosion control upon completion of grading or some other alternative method of erosion control shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Official. In addition, a permanent irrigation system shall be provided. This requirement does not release the applicant/developer from compliance with the slope planting requirements of Section 17.08.040 of the Development Code. • 6 Itom r: 117 Project No DRC2012-01202 Completion Date 6. A separate Grading and Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects • and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer. 7. If human remains are discovered on-site before or during grading, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98 and California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5. 8. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit. 9. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, that plan shall be a separate plan/permit from the Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 10. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a Grading Permit. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. 11. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit. 12. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage acceptance letter(s) from adjacent downstream property owner(s) or discharge flows in a natural condition (concentrated flows are not accepted) and shall provide the Building and Safety Official a drainage study showing the proposed flows do not exceed the existing • flows prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit. 13. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to obtain written permission from the adjacent property owners owners to construct walls on property lines or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s)to be constructed off-set from the property line. 14. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on-site construction where possible,possible, and provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 15. All slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot off-set from the public right-of-way or adjacent private property. 16. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the latest adopted California Plumbing Code. 17. The final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100 feet beyond the the project boundary. 18. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a Grading Permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official 19. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 20. The precise Grading and Drainage Plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout"Information for Grading Plans and Permit." • 7 Item G 138 Project No. DRC2012-01202 Completion Date 21. Grading Inspections: —/—/— a. Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall • request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the Grading Permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b. The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Services Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i. The bottom of the over-excavation; ii. Completion of rough grading - The grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Services Department front counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iii. The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. 22. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy the engineer of record shall certify the —/—/— functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) best management practices(BMP)devices. 23. Private streets for multi-family developments will include street plans as part of the Grading and Drainage Plan set. Plan view to show typical street sections. Profile view to show • centerline and top of curb profiles. M. Water Quality Management Plan 1. A Storm Water Quality Management Plan shall be approved by the Building and Safety —/—/— Official and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit 2. The Water Quality Management Plan shall include a copy of the project Conditions of _/—/— Approval. THE APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT, (909)477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: N. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline): 50 total feet on Arrow Route —/—/- 2. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. —/—/- 8 • Item G 139 • Project No. DRC2012-01202 Completion Date 3. All existing easements tying within future rights-of-way shall be quitclaimed or delineated on • the final map. 4. Easements for public sidewalks placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City. O. Street Improvements 1. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. 2. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Curb 8 A.C. Side- Drive StreetStreet Comm Median Bike Street Name Gutter Pvmt walk Appr. Lights Trees Trail Island Trail Other Arrow Route X X (c) X X X (b) Interior Streets X X X X X X SCE Easement Area I I L I #X ::# (e) • Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item. (e) Community Trail Related Improvements acceptable by SCE. 3. Improvement Plans and Construction: —/—/— a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department In addition to any other permits required. C. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. • 9 Item G 140 Project No. DRC2012-01202 Completion Date Notes: —/—/- 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum • of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to submittal for first plan check. 4. Street improvement plans per City Standards for all private streets shall be provided for _/_/_ review and approval by the City Engineer. Prior to any work being performed on the private streets, fees shall be paid and construction permits shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. 5. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 6. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the • street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet_ (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Min. Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space spacing Size MY. Arrow Route Gingko biloba Maidenhair Tree 5' 25' 15 Gal "Fairmount" 0.C. Interior Streets SELECT APPROPRIATE TREE FROM THE APPROVED STREET Provide Street TREE LIST FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA. LIST EACH STREET AS Names A SEPARATE LINE ITEM WITHIN THIS LEGEND. Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 10 • Item G 141 ' Project No. DRC2012-01202 Completion Date 7. Intersection fine of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance —/—/— • with adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. P. Public Maintenance Areas 1. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and —/—/— Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. Q. Drainage and Flood Control 1. It shall be the developer's responsibility to have the current FIRM Zone AE designation —/—/— removed from the project area. The developer shall provide drainage and/or flood protection facilities sufficient to obtain a Zone "X" designation. The developer's engineer shall prepare all necessary reports, plans, and hydrologic/hydraulic calculations. A Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) shall be obtained from FEMA prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. A Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) shall be issued by FEMA prior to occupancy or improvement acceptance, whichever occurs first. 2. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final —/—/— map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. 3. A permit from the San Bernardino County Flood Control District is required for work within —/—/— its right-of-way. O• Utilities 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, —/—/— gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV(all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. —/—/- 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the —/—/— Cucamonga Valley Water District(CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 4. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. —/—/— Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. • 11 Itam C; tdJ Project No. DRC2012-01202 Completion Date S. General Requirements and Approvals 1. Permits shall be obtained from the following agencies for work within their right of-way: —/—/— • Southern California Edison, Southern California Gas Company, and County of San Bernardino. 2. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs —/—/— for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to Building Permit issuance if no map is involved. 3. Prior to the issuance of Building Permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees —/—/— shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable 9 at least 50 percent of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department when the first Building Permit application is submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: The project must comply in design and constructed in accordance with the 2010 California Building and Fire Codes, the RCFPD Ordinance FD50 and the RCFPD Standards. The RCFPD ordinance, procedures & standards which are referenced in this document can be access on the web at www citvofrc.us. T. Single-Family Tract Standard Conditions FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply 1. The public water supply and fire hydrants shall be design in accordance with RCFPD and —/—/— • CVWD Standards and Policies. 2. The private water supply (when applicable) and fire hydrants shall be design in accordance with the RCFPD Ordinance, Standard 5-10 and the current edition of the California Fire Code. FSC-2 Fire Flow 1. Fire review and approval of the public water plans to be submitted to CVWD for permit —/—/— issuance. 2. Building Permits will not be issued until public fire protection water plans are approved and —/—/— adequate water supply is provided for construction purposes. 3. On all architectural plan sets to be submitted for building plan check provide a Site Plan that —/—/— illustrate all the proposed public and private fire hydrants located on/and within 600-feet of the project site. 4. The required fire flow for this project is calculated gallons per minute at a minimum residual —/—/— pressure of 20-pounds per square inch. This requirement is made in accordance with California Fire Code Appendix, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances. The required minimum fire flow for this project may be reduced by 50 percent when automatic fire sprinklers are installed. 5. Public fire hydrants located within the immediate vicinity of the proposed project may be used —/—/— to provide the required fire flow subject to Fire District review and approval. Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow. • 12 Itpm C; 143 Project No. DRC2012-01202 Completion Date FSC-9 Single-family Residential Sales Model homes require approved Fire District vehicle • access and water supply from a public or private water main system before construction. FCS-10 Fire Sprinklers: All structures must be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers in accordance with NFPA 13D and the current edition of the California residential Code. FSC-13 Alternate Method Application: Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will review all requests for alternate method, when submitted. The request must be submitted on the Fire District "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the review fee. FCS-15 Annexation of the parcel map: the project must be annexed into the Community Facilities District #85-1 or #88-1. The annexation must be completed prior to the issuance of grading or Building Permits. Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS—Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any Building Permits: 1. Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CVWD. On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the project. Please reference the RCFPD Standard#10-5. 2. Construction Access: The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #14-1. All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14'6" above the finished surface of the road. • 3. Fire Flow: A current fire flow letter from CVWD must be received. The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CVWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services. PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION—Please complete the following: 1. Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers". On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location. 2. Public Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be Installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services. 3. Address: Prior to the granting of occupancy, single-family dwellings shall post the address with minimum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting background. The numbers shall be internally or externally illuminated during periods of darkness. The numbers shall be visible from the street. When building setback from the public roadway exceeds 100-feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry. • 13 Itpm r 1dd STAFF REPORT • PLANNING DEP.ARTTIENT RANCHO DATE: October 23, 2013 CUCAMONGA TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Candyce Burnett, Planning Manager BY: Mike Smith, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19448 - MIG/HOGLE-IRELAND FOR GOODMAN RANCHO SPE, LLC: A review of a tentative parcel map in conjunction with a proposal to construct two (2) industrial warehouse buildings of 555,664 square feet (Building 1/Phase 1) and 1,033,565 square feet (Building 2/Phase 2) on a property comprised of three (3) parcels with a combined area of 3,255,834 square feet (74.7 acres) which is currently developed with a concrete pipe manufacturing/storage facility (operated by Ameron International) in the Heavy Industrial (HI) District located at the southwest corner of Arrow Route and Etiwanda Avenue; APNs: 0229-131-04, -17, and -25. Related files: Development Review DRC2013- 00155, Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00315, and Uniform Sign Program DRC2013- 00316. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. • ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00155 - MIG/HOGLE-IRELAND FOR GOODMAN RANCHO SPE, LLC: A review of a proposal to construct two (2) industrial warehouse buildings of 555,664 square feet (Building 1/Phase 1) and 1,033,565 square feet (Building 2/Phase 2) on a property comprised of three (3) parcels with a combined area of 3,255,834 square feet (74.7 acres) which is currently developed with a concrete pipe manufacturing/storage facility (operated by Ameron International) in the Heavy Industrial (HI) District located at the southwest corner of Arrow Route and Etiwanda Avenue; APNs: 0229-131-04, -17, and -25. Related files: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19448, Tree Removal Permit DRC2013- 00315, and Uniform Sign Program DRC2013-00316. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2013-00315 - MIG/HOGLE-IRELAND FOR GOODMAN RANCHO SPE, LLC: A request to remove trees in conjunction with a proposal to construct two (2) industrial warehouse buildings of 555,664 square feet (Building 1/Phase 1) and 1,033,565 square feet (Building 2/Phase 2) on a property comprised of three (3) parcels with a combined area of 3,255,834 square feet (74.7 acres) which is currently developed with a concrete pipe manufacturing/storage facility (operated by Ameron International) in the Heavy Industrial (HI) District located at the southwest corner of Arrow Route and Etiwanda Avenue; APNs: 0229-131-04, -17, and -25. Related files: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19448, Development Review DRC2013- 00155, and Uniform Sign Program DRC2013-00316. UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM DRC2013-00316 - MIG/HOGLE-IRELAND FOR • GOODMAN RANCHO SPE, LLC: A request to establish a Uniform Sign Program in conjunction with a proposal to construct two (2) industrial warehouse buildings of 555,664 square feet (Building 1/Phase 1) and 1,033,565 square feet (Building 2/Phase 2) on a property comprised of three (3) parcels with a combined area of 3,255,834 Items H-K 1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM19448, DRC2013-00155, DRC2013-00315, DRC2013-00316 - MIG/HOGLE-IRELAND FOR GOODMAN RANCHO SPE, LLC • October 23, 2013 Page 2 square feet (74.7 acres) which is currently developed with a concrete pipe manufacturing/storage facility (operated by Ameron International) in the Heavy Industrial (HI) District located at the southwest corner of Arrow Route and Etiwanda Avenue; APNs: 0229-131-04, -17, and -25. Related files: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19448, Development Review DRC2013-00155 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2013 00315 These applications were originally scheduled for review and action by the Planning Commission on October 23, 2013 and are now scheduled for hearing at the November 13, 2013 meeting. The rescheduling is because there was a technical error in the public notification process. The number of posted notices on the subject property was not in compliance with Section 17.14.050(B)(4) of the Development Code. At the direction of the Assistant City Attorney, the public hearing for these applications must be re-advertised with new mailed notices, postings, and newspaper advertising. The notification period for the re-advertised public hearing is 10 days. Therefore, the Planning Commission public hearing for these applications has been scheduled for November 13, 2013. RespectfuP submitted, Candyce urnett Planning Manager • CB:MS/Is • Items H-K 2 STAFF REPORT • PLiNNING DEPARn,,[ENT Date: October 23, 2013 RANCHO CUCAMONGA To: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission From: Candyce Burnett, Planning Manager By: Jennifer Nakamura, Associate Planner Subject: DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2013-00817 AND ADDENDUM TO GENERAL PLAN FINAL PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (FPEIR) (SCH #2000061027) - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A supplement to the Development Code Update (DRC2010-00571) amending Title 17 (Development Code) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to clarity definitions, administrative procedures and correct prior errors and omissions. An Addendum to the General Plan FPEIR has been prepared for this project. This item will be forwarded to the City Council for final action. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission make the following recommendations to the City Council: 1. Adoption of an addendum to the General Plan Program Environmental Impact Report for Development Code Amendment DRC2013-00817; and 2. Approval of Development Code Amendment DRC2013-00817. • BACKGROUND: On July 18, 2012, the City Council, on the recommendation of the Planning Commission, adopted the City's updated Development Code. The updated Development Code became effective on September 4, 2012. At the City Council hearing, staff proposed to present Code updates on a regular basis to deal with issues that were discovered after the Code became effective. In December, the City Council, on the recommendation of the Planning Commission, adopted the first supplemental updates to the Development Code. The changes proposed at this time will (1) reinstate development standards that were unintentionally omitted from the Development Code, (2) revise conflicting information across sections and chapters of the Code and (3) Permit Emergency Shelters as a "by right" use in the General Commercial zoning district. These standards existed in the Development Code prior to the 2012 comprehensive Development Code Update. After working with the Code for the past year, staff has identified several items that were inadvertently left out and are important to creating consistency between new and prior development. In addition, a change to the land use table for Emergency Shelters, consistent with State law, is included in this update. This change should have been included in the 2012 comprehensive update and was unintentionally omitted. SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGES: Staff recommends the changes to the Development Code summarized below. Attachment 1 of the Resolution prepared for the Commission's consideration includes the actual text changes to the Development Code. All spelling, grammatical and formatting errors that have been discovered since the publishing of the Development Code will be corrected. Typographic and grammatical errors are not included in the summary of proposed changes, but are included in the body of Attachment 1. • Item L 1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT CODE UPDATE DRC2013-00817 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA October 23, 2013 Page 2 • Article III Zoning Districts, Allowed Uses. and Development Standards 1. Allowed Use Modifications. Amend allowed use regulations in Table 17.30.030-1 for consistency with state law to allow Emergency Shelters as a permitted use in the GC District. State law requires all jurisdictions to permit Emergency Shelters "by right' in at least one zoning district. They will continue to be conditionally permitted in the GI District. Staff will put forth for consideration more specific development standards for this use in a future code update. 2. Allowed Use Descriptions. Amend Section 17.32.020 to amend the definition of Service Stations to include convenience sales, consistent with previous descriptions of gas/service stations. Sales of alcohol will continue to be regulated separately, with a Conditional Use Permit. 3. Industrial Building Height. Amend Table 17.36.040-1 and 17.36.040-2 as follows: • Revise the maximum setback to 70 feet, with a minimum based on the street type, and additional 1 foot setback required for every 1 foot of height over 35 feet. • Revise the maximum height limit to 75 feet while allowing for heights over 75 feet with a Conditional Use Permit. These tables, as currently written, are difficult to interpret and do not adequately reflect the standards that were to be carried over from the old code. 4. Rail Service Standards. Amend Section 17.36.040 to include all rail standards from the old • code. Some were incorporated in a recent update, but some were left out. 5. Vehicle Back Up Distance. Amend Section 17.36.010 to reincorporate the requirement for 24 feet of back up clearance for driveways. This standard was unintentionally omitted from the code. 6. Equipment Screening. Amend Sections 17.36.030 and 17.36.040 to reinstate equipment screening standards for roof, wall and ground mounted equipment. These were unintentionally omitted from the code. Article IV Site Development Provisions 7. Fence/Wall Height. Amend Table 17.48.050-1 to limit walls, fences, or shrubs within the clear visibility triangle to 36 inches. This table in inconsistent with past practice and the current definition of the clear visibility triangle. 8. Outdoor Recreation Courts Fencing. Amend Section 17.48.050 to reinstate fence height requirements for outdoor recreation courts (i.e. tennis or basketball) on residential properties. These standards were unintentionally omitted from the Code. 9, Landscape Plan Review. Amend Section 17.56.040 to clarify that final landscape plans are required to be submitted after entitlement approval, not before as currently indicated. 10. Outdoor Lighting Standards. Amend Section 17.58.020 to clarify that this chapter applies to both new and existing development. • Item L 2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT CODE UPDATE DRC2013-00817 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA October 23, 2013 • Page 3 11. Industrial Dock Lighting. Amend Section 17.58.050 to reinstate development standards for wall mounted industrial dock lighting that were unintentionally omitted from the code. Wall mounted dock lighting was previously permitted with standards for height and glare. 12. Parking Stall Length. Amend Section 17.64.040 to eliminate an inconsistency between the text of the code and the associated table indicating the minimum parking stall length dimension. 13. Parking Calculations. Amend Section 17.64.050 to exempt square footage dedicated to restrooms, hallways and stairwells from total square footage to calculate the number of parking spaces required in non-residential uses. This was unintentionally omitted and allows marginally used spaces to provide relief from required parking. 14. Double Striping of Parking Spaces. Amend Section 17.64.040 to provide dimensional standards For the double striping of parking spaces. These standards were unintentionally omitted from the code. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, an addendum to the General Plan Program Environmental Impact Report (SCH #2000061027) has been prepared. This Development Code Amendment does not propose any substantial changes in the City's development regulations that were not analyzed in the General Plan EIR or that will require major revisions of the EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects, or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. As a consequence, an addendum is the appropriate level of environmental review. • The addendum is provided and shown as Attachment 2 of the Resolution prepared for the Commission's consideration. NOTICE: Pursuant to Government Code Section 65090, this item was advertised 14 days in advance as a public hearing (1/8 page ad) in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper. No individual notice to property owners was provided. Respectfully submitted, Candyce urnett Planning Manager CB:JN/Is Attachments: Planning Commission Resolution Recommending Approval of DRC2013-00817 • Item L 3 RESOLUTION NO. 13-50 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2013-00817,A SUPPLEMENTAL UPDATE TO THE DEVELOPMENT CODE. A. Recitals. 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for Development Code Amendment DRC2013-00817 for a supplemental update to the City's Development Code found in Title 17 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. 2. On October 23, 2013, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. The Planning Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to the Planning Commission during the • above-referenced public hearing on October 23, 2013, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The City Council adopted a comprehensive update to the City's Development Code that implements the policies of the General Plan, in July 2012. The new Development Code became effective on September 4, 2012. b. Based on feedback received since the effective date of the Development Code,the City prepared a set of amendments(the"Amendments"),which is included as Attachment A to this Resolution and is hereby incorporated by this reference as if set forth in full. C. Development Code Amendment DRC2013-00817 conforms to and does not conflict with the General Plan, including without limitation, the Land Use Element thereof, and will provide for development in a manner consistent with the General Plan. d. The City has prepared an Addendum (the "Addendum") to the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Environmental Impact Report (SCH#2000061027) (the "Final EIR"), attached hereto as Attachment B to this Resolution,which confirms that the environmental impacts stemming from Development Code Amendment DRC2012-01056 were adequately addressed in the Final EIR and that a subsequent EIR or Negative Declaration is not required for the Development Code Update. The Planning Commission finds that the Addendum complies with the California Environmental Quality Act, its implementing regulations at 14 California Code of Regulations § 15000 at seq., and the City's local CEQA guidelines (collectively"CEQA"). • 1 Item L 4 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-50 DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT- DRC2013-00817 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA October 23, 2013 Page 2 3. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, the • Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt Development Code Amendment DRC2013-00817. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF OCTOBER 2013. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Frances Howdyshell, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission for the City of Rancho Cucamonga,do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced,passed,and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 23rd day of October 2013, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: • ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: 2 • Item L 5 Proposed Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Development Code • Staff is recommending the following amendments to the Development Code. These amendments are shown in track changes as excerpts from relevant sections of the Development Code with new language shown with underlined text and existing language to be removed shown with strike out text. Article III Zoning Districts, Uses and Standards Chapter 17.30 Allowed Land Use by Base Zoning District TABLE 17.30.030-1 ALLOWED LAND USES AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS BY BASE ZONING DISTRICT N X' IL :;Use2onln9 O . z. C7 ' v vi s " t� x . O x. ResideMiahUses•; '� "` ` .i Emergency N N N N N N N N N GP N N N N N c N N N N NI Shelter Chapter 17.32 Allowed Use Descriptions Section 17.32.020 Allowed Use Descriptions 9. Service Station. A retail business selling gasoline or other motor vehicle fuels. May include a convenience store. Vehicle services which are incidental to fuel services are included under Vehicle Services— Minor. Section 17.36.030 Development Standards for Commercial and Office Zoning Districts D. Other Miscellaneous Commercial and Office Development Standards. 9A. Equipment Screening. Any equipment whether on the roof, side of building, or ground shall be screened. The method of screening shall be architecturally integrated in terms of material, color, shape and size. The screening design shall blend with the building design. Where individual equipment is provided, a continuous screen is desireable. Section 17.36.040 Development Standards for Industrial Districts TABLE 17.36.040-1 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS Development Standard/Zoning District' IP GI MUHI ' HI Lot Area(minimum)(') 0.5 ac 0.5 ac 5a� o 5 ac • Attachment A Item L 6 Proposed Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Development Standard/ZonIng District- IP- G1 MI/HI HI Lot Width (minimum)13) 100 ft 100 ft 100 ft 100 ft • Setback(minimum distance between structure and property line in feet)(4) Front Yard See Table 17.36.040-2 Side Yard 5 ft(5) 5 ft(5) 1 5 ft(5) 5 ft j5> Street Side Yard (and rear yard abutting street) See Table 17.36.040-2 Rear Yard oft(5) O ft(5) O ft(5) O ft(5) Distance Between Buildings Primary Buildings Must meet current Building Code requirements Accessory Buildings Building Height(maximum in feet) 35 ft at the front setback. plus 1 it for every 1 Primary Buildings add1 Maximum height is 750 feet.(D Accessory Buildings 14 ft 18 ft 18 ft 24 it Floor Area Ratio(maximum ratio of building to lot square footage) Floor Area Ratio 1 40-60% 1 50-60% n/a 40-509/6 Open Space Requirement(minimum percentage of open space per parcel or project) Open Space/Landscape Area 15% 10% 10%(2)/ Other Performance Standards (see Chapter 17.66) A B C/B(�) C • Table Notes: (1) Condominium Lots. Condominium lots and lots within an approved Master Planned Development are exempt from required minimum parcel size and dimension requirements. (2) The following applies within 1,000 feet of Arrow Route:minimum 2-acre lot area; 10%minimum landscape area;and the W level Performance Standards(Chapter 17.66). (3) Setbacks shall be the minim um required under the City's currently adopted Building Code. (4) Setback shall be increased to 45 feet when abutting a residential property line. (5) See Table 17.36.040-2 for parcels abutting special boulevards as indicated in Figure 17.36.040-1 (Special Streetscape Requirements). (6) Buildings exceedrng 35 feet high shall be set back an additional 1 ft from the front setback for each I ft of height up to a maximum setback of 70 feet. t7) Heights over 75 feet may be Permitted with a Conditional Use Permit D. Other Miscellaneous Industrial Development Standards. 1. Special Streetscape. Future development and redevelopment within industrial areas shall be consistent with the special streetscape standards listed in Table 17.36.040-2 (Streetscape Setback Requirements) and as depicted in Figure 17.36.040-1 (Special Streetscape Requirements). TABLE 17.36.040-2 STREETSCAPE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS Average Depth of, t;i,ay te. StieetType .', t1 =) : Building Setback Parking Setback Landscape,, Major Arterial & Special 45 ft 45 it 25 ft • Item L 7 Proposed Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Boulevard • Secondary 35 ft 35 ft 20 ft LocaVCollector 25 ft 25 ft 15 ft Table Notes: (1) The average depth shall be uninterrupted from the face of curb, except for sidewalks,pedestrian hardscape,plazas and courtyards,and monument signs. (2) Parcels less than 225 feet in depth from the ultimate curb face on special boulevards are not required to provide an average depth of landscaping or building setback greater than 25 feet or 20% the depth of the property, whichever is greater. (3) As determined from ultimate face of curb. (4) Average depth of landscaping must still be provided. (5) Street frontage wells and fences over 3 feet in height are subject to building setbacks. (6) Setback may be increased based on budding height See Table 17 35 040-1 6. Rail Service. Properties which adjoin existing or proposed lead or spur lines shall provide rail service access. Rail crossings and any spur construction must be approved by the railroad and the Public Utilities Commission. The following rail service standards, unless modified by the railroad or the Public Utilities Commission, shall apply: a. Minimum easement width for a lead line, single track shall be thirty two (32) feet. b. Minimum easement width for a double rail track shall be forty one (41) feet. • C. The minimum radius of curvature for a track shall be one hundred eighty (180)feet. d. The maximum gradient along spur tracks shall not exceed two (2) percent. e. Dock height shall be no less than four and one half (4.5) feet above the top of the spur track. f. Road crossings at grade should be avoided wherever possible. a Spur trackage is not permitted along any building frontage and must be confined to the side or rear portions of the buildings. h Lot divisions and building layouts for properties which adioin existing or proposed lead and sour lines shall be done in a manner to ensure full potential of future rail access and use and should not preclude rail access to other properties adiacent to such rail lines. Subdivisions, which could reduce a property's ability to accommodate potential rail served developments may not be authorized. i. Building design shall include rail service features to ensure the potential use of available spur lines. • Item L 8 Proposed Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Development Code j Finished floor elevations and dock height door or "kick out' wall panels shall be provided in all properties abutting rail lines. k The above-referenced rail service development standards may be • amended or deleted on a site-by-site basis during the development review process. The following must be determined by the Planning Commission in order to authorize any modification of the rail service standard: i. That the installation of a lead or spur track cannot be accomplished due to physical constraints on or adjacent to the project site; and ii. Other existing or potential rail service properties will not be negatively affected in their ability to accommodate rail service activity as a result of modifications to the standards. 7. Equipment Screening. The following equipment screening standards shall apply: a. All roof, wall and ground mounted equipment shall be screened from all sides within the Industrial Park (IP) and General Industrial (GI) zoning districts. b. Wherever possible all roof, wall and ground mounted equipment shall be screened from all sides within the Minimum Impact/Heavy Industrial (MIMI) and Heavy Industrial (HI) zoning districts. Vic. All screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building • design and where possible a roof parapet wall shall be used to screen roof or wall mounted equipment. Where roof mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork proiects more than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet, it shall be screened by an architecturally design enclosure which exhibits a permanent nature with the building design and is detailed consistent with the building. Where roof mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork projects less than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet it shall be painted consistent with the color scheme of the building. Article IV Site Development Provisions Chapter 17.48 Fences, Walls, and Screening Section 17.48.050 Requirements by Land Use Type C. Residential. • Item L 9 Proposed Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Development Code 1. Trail fences and gates shall be kept in good repair at all times, including • replacing damaged members and maintaining plumb. This shall not preclude the property owner from replacing the existing trail fence with another fence or wall material. 2. Height. The height of fences in residential district is limited according to the following table. TABLE 17.48.050-1 MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF FENCES AND WALLS IN REQUIRED YARD AREA _..-. . - Location or: Location of FenceiWalUScreening . Minimum 8etbi cll Maxlmum Height(1) 4 c1 Fango Required front yard area 0 ft(2) 3 fV 6 ft(3) Required rear and interior side yard area (along rear 0 ft 6 ft and interior property lines) Required street side yard area (along corner side 5 ft(2) 6 ft property lines) At intersections of streets, alleys, and driveways within varies(4) 360 in the clear visibility triangle All other areas of lot 0 it 6 It Table Notes: (1) As part of Site Development Review, Design Review(Minor or Major), or other discretionary entitlement, the designated approving authonty may grant additional height or location requirements to enclose or screen specific areas or uses or for fences and wells designed for noise attenuation. • (2) Setback area for street side yard is measured property line to the fence or wall. (3) Height of front yard fence or wall may be increased to a maximum of B feet it the top 3 feet of fencing is constructed of material that is 90%visually open and transparent(e.g.,picket fence, open wood slats, open wrought iron)including any architectural features designed as part of the fence(e g.,pilasters and lights). (4) See definition of clear vision Mangle in Section 17.120(Universal Definitions). 3. Outdoor Recreation Courts. Fencing for outdoor recreation courts (e.g. tennis courts, basketball courts) shall not exceed twelve (12) feet in height and shall be located five (5) feet from any rear or side property lines, except when adjacent to outdoor recreation courts on adjacent properties. Chapter 17.56 Landscaping Standards Section 17.56.040 Landscape Plan Review Process A. Landscaping Plans Subject to Review. When the requirements of this Chapter are applicable as established in Section 17.56.020 (Applicability), the following landscape plan review process shall be conducted in conjunction with design review for the proposed action, pursuant to the requirements of Section 17.16.140 (Design Review). 3. Approving Authority. The designated approving authority shall be the same as the designated approving authority of the entitlement for new projects or existing development as identified in Section 17.56.020 (Applicability). For • Item L 10 Proposed Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Development Code projects in the wildland-urban interface fire area, the Fire Chief is an additional approving authority. 4. Approval of Preliminary and Final Plans. The designated approving authority • shall review and approve the preliminary landscape and irrigation plan. Upon approval of the preliminary landscape and irrigation plan, a final landscape and irrigation plan shall be submitted to the approving authority prior to issuance of Building Permits 9F plaRRing eRtitleppeRtS for new projects or applicable expansions to existing development as established in Section 17.56.020 (Applicability). 5. Approval Required. The landscaping shall not be installed until the applicant receives approval of the final landscape and irrigation plan by the approving authority and any applicable permits have been issued. 6. Changes to Final Plans. Changes to the approved final landscape and irrigation plans that affect the character or quantity of the plant material or irrigation system design are required to be resubmitted for approval before installation. Chapter 17.58 Outdoor Lighting Standards Section 17.58.020 Applicability The requirements of this Chapter apply to all new and existing development. Whenever • a person is required to obtain a Building Permit, Electrical Permit, and/or approval of a planning entitlement, the applicant shall submit sufficient information for the approving authority to determine whether the proposed lighting will comply with the requirements of this Chapter. Chapter 17.64 Parking and Loading Standards Section 17.64.040 General Parking and Loading Requirements B. Parking Space and Drive Aisle Dimensions. 1. When outdoors (e.g., parking lot), each parking space shall have a minimum size of nine feet (9') by seventeen feet (18T) with a required one foot (1') overhang (e.g., over a curb stop) and shall be free of obstructions such as columns or walls. 4-.2 All parking stalls shall be permanently maintained with double lines, with two lines located an equal of nine inches (9") on either side of the stall sidelines. • Item L 11 Proposed Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Development Code TABLE 17.64.040-1: ANGLED PARKING SPACE AND DRIVE AISLE DIMENSIONS • V , Sta i.:: Two Rows+ llWldth . .Still�toCurb• Aisle"Angle: Aisle a r':: ti', c, 19'-0" 25'-0"(1) 63'-0" 900 9'-6" 19'-0" 24'-8"(1) 62,-6„ 101-0" 191-0" 24'-0"111 62,-0" 9'-0" 21'0" 20'-0"0> 62"-0" 914" 21'-0" 19'-0111�1 61,-0" 600 9,.6„ 21,-3„ 18'-611(2) 61'-0" 101-0" 21'-6" 18'-0"(�) 61'-0" 9'-0" 19'-10" 20'-0"01 59'-8" V-0" 19'-10" 16'-411(2) 56'-0" 450 9,-6„ 20,-2„ 15,-211(2) 55'-6" 10'-0" 20'-6" 14'-0"(2) 55'-0" Table Nates: (1) Two-way aisle (2) One-way aisle Section 17.64.050 Number of Parking Spaces Required C. The following number of parking spaces shall be required to serve the uses or • buildings listed, as established in Table 17.64.050-1 (Parking Requirements by Land Use). Multiple property owners may apply for a use permit for shared parking pursuant to Section 17.64.060 (Reductions in Parking Requirements). Otherwise, all uses must provide the sum of the requirements for each individual use. Where the requirements result in a fractional space, the next larger whole number shall be the number of spaces required. In addition, the requirements listed below shall apply. 7. "Square feet" means "gross square feet" and refers to the sum gross square feet of the Floor area of a building and its accessory buildings unless otherwise specified. 8. For the purpose of calculating residential parking requirements, dens, studies, or other similar rooms that may be used as bedrooms shall be considered bedrooms. 9. Where the number of seats is listed to determine required parking, seats shall be construed to be fixed seats. Where fixed seats provided are either benches or bleachers, one seat shall be construed to equal eighteen (18) linear inches for pews and twenty-four inches (24") for dining, but in no case shall seating be less than determined as required by the Building Code. 10. When the calculation of the required number of off-street parking spaces results in a fraction of a space, the total number of spaces shall be rounded up to the nearest whole number. • Item L 12 Proposed Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Development Code 11. Where private streets are proposed for residential development, resident and guest parking shall be provided as determined by the approving authority in conjunction with the required planning entitlement(s). • �1 _12 For projects on commercial office and industrial zoned properties square footage dedicated to restrooms hallways and stairwells may be deducted from the gross square footage for parking stall calculation purposes. • • Item L 13 Addendum to the Rancho Cucamonga 1010 General Plan Update Environmental Impact Report • ADDENDUM This Addendum to the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Environmental Impact Report (SCHft2000061027)(the"EIR")has been prepared in connection with the City's supplemental amendment to the Development Code (the "Project"). The Addendum confirms that the environmental impacts stemming from the Project were adequately addressed in the EIR and that a subsequent EIR or Negative Declaration is not required for the Project. Proposed Supplemental Development Code Amendments The Project consists of supplemental amendments to the City's recently adopted comprehensive Development Code,which was in turn adopted to implement the policies of the recently completed 2010 General Plan Update. Since adoption of the Development Code Update in July 2012, City staff has identified several errors and omissions in the Development Code that were never intended to be eliminated from the Code. Staff has also identified areas where text is inconsistent or incomplete and requires further clarification to properly communicate the intended development requirements. Further, staff identified one land use, Emergency Shelters that as currently written, is inconsistent with State law. State law requires all jurisdictions to allow Emergency Shelters"by right" in at least one zoning district. In the Housing Element of the General Plan, we identified the GC (General Commercial) zone as the appropriate zone to allow this type of land use "by right"; however, the Development Code was not updated accordingly. The purpose of the Project is to correct these errors and omissions and clarify text where necessary. It is therefore considered to be largely procedural in nature. The Project will not affect the current methods of conducting environmental review for new development applications. Table A-1 summarizes the changes proposed in the project and the reason for including into the Development Code. • Table A-1:Summary of Proposed Changes to the Development Code Article Chapter Topic Change Proposed Reason III 17.30 Emergency Need to allow for Emergency Consistency with State law; Shelters Shelters"by right" in GC zone. unintentionally omitted from Development Code. III 17.32 Definition Review the definition of "Service Consistency with prior Stations" to determine if it is definition of gas/service appropriate to include convenience stations. stores, or create a unique service station definition with convenience stores. III 17.36 Industrial Revise front setback on the table Error in transcription from Building Height to max 70 feet, set max building old to new code. • Attachment B Page Iof6 Item L 14 Addendum to the Rancho Cucamonga 2010 General Plan Update Environmental Impact Report Article Chapter Topic Change Proposed Reason • height to 75 feet(or more with a CUP). III 17.36 Rail Standards Reincorporate Rail Service Standards. Unintentionally omitted from the old code. III 17.36 Backup Reincorporate the language that Unintentionally omitted from distance for requires 24 feet clearance from the old code. vehicles driveways for backup purposes. IV 17.48 Fence/Wall Correct inconsistency between text Clarifying text to eliminate Height and definition of Clear Visibility an inconsistency. Triangle for fence/wall/hedge height IV 17.48 Recreational Add development standards for Unintentionally omitted from Fencing recreational court fencing from the old code. the old code. • IV 17.56 Landscape Plan Clarification needed on when Clarifying text to eliminate Review Process final landscape plans are an inconsistency. required to be submitted (after entitlement approval, not before). IV 17.58 Outdoor Clarify that this chapter applies Clarifying text to eliminate Lighting to existing development, not just an inconsistency. new development. IV 17.58 Industrial Dock Reinstate development standards Unintentionally omitted from Lighting for wall mounted industrial dock the old code. lighting. IV 17.64 Parking stall Inconsistency between the text Clarifying text to eliminate length and table for minimum parking an inconsistency stall length dimension Page 2 of 6 • Item L 15 Addendum to the Rancho Cucamonga 1010 General Plan Update Environmental Impact Report • Article Chapter Topic Change Proposed Reason IV 17.64 Parking Reinstate the language that Unintentionally omitted from exempts restrooms, hallways, the old code. stairwells, etc. from parking calculations. IV 17.64 Double striping Add typical standards for double Unintentionally omitted from striping of parking spaces from the old code. the old code III 17.36 Equipment Reinstate development requirement Unintentionally omitted Screening that equipment screening to be from the old code. architecturally compatible and integrated with the building design. The 2010 General Plan Update and Environmental Impact Report • On May 19, 2010, the City Council adopted the 2010 General Plan Update and certified the EIR. The updated plan serves as the foundation for many of the City's regulatory documents, including the Development Code,specific plans,community plans, master plans,and design guidelines. With the 2010 General Plan Update, the City's focus shifted to infill development (development of remaining vacant properties within developed business districts and residential neighborhoods). The EIR evaluated potential for the 2010 General Plan Update to result in environmental impacts, as summarized in the following table: No Mitigation Mitigation Measures Significant and Unavoidable Agricultural Resources Cultural Resources Aesthetics Biological Resources Hazards and Hazardous Agricultural Resources Geology and Soils Materials Air Quality Population, Housing and Hydrology and Water Quality Climate Change Employment Land Use and Planning Mineral Resources Public Services Noise Parks and Recreation Transportation and Traffic Utilities and Service Systems The City made findings regarding the environmental impacts of adopting the General Plan as well as overriding considerations for significant and unavoidable impacts, both individually and cumulatively, for • Page 3 of 6 Item L 16 Addendum to the Rancho Cucamonga 2010 General Plan Update Environmental Impact Report the following issues: Aesthetics, Agricultural Resources, Air Quality, Climate Change, and Mineral • Resources. The findings made by the City necessary to certify the EIR and adopt the General Plan also included a mitigation monitoring and reporting program. For impacts to Land Use and Planning,the City determined that changes or alterations have been incorporated into the General Plan that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects identified in the EIR resulting in a less than significant impact. More specifically the City's findings stated there would be no conflict between the General Plan and the Development Code because updates to the Development Code, as well as adherence to standard conditions related to consistency of future development with the proposed 2010 General Plan Update and the City's Development Code, will reduce the potential impacts related to plan consistency to a less than significant level. CEQA Review Requirements The California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") generally requires agencies to analyze the possible environmental impacts of a project prior to approval. Depending on the nature and extent of the potential impacts, the agency may be required to adopt a Negative Declaration or Environmental Impact Report (EIR). Under Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines, when an EIR has been certified or a Negative Declaration adopted for a project, no subsequent EIR shall be prepared for that project unless the lead agency determines, on the basis of substantial evidence in the light of the whole record, one or more of the following: (1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous • EIR or Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; (2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or (3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete or the Negative Declaration was adopted,shows any of the following: a. The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or Negative Declaration; b. Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR; c. Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible,and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project,but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or Page 4 of 6 • Item L 17 Addendum to the Rancho Cucamonga 2010 General Plan Update Environmental Impact Report • d. Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. If the none of these conditions calling for the preparation of a subsequent EIR or Negative Declaration are met, but minor technical changes or additions are necessary to a previously adopted environmental document are needed, Section 16164 of the CECIA Guidelines allow the lead agency to prepare an addendum to the prior environmental document. A brief explanation of the decision not to prepare a subsequent EIR pursuant should be included in the addendum,the lead agency's findings on the project, or elsewhere in the record. The explanation must be supported by substantial evidence. The addendum need not be circulated for public review but can be included in or attached to the final EIR or adopted Negative Declaration,and must be considered by the decision-making body prior to making a decision on the project. Analysis This addendum to the EIR has been prepared for the Project because none of the conditions specified in Section 15162 of the CECIA Guidelines requiring the preparation of a subsequent EIR or Negative Declaration are met. • First, the Project does not propose substantial changes in the City's development regulations that were not analyzed in the EIR or that will require major revisions of the EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. The Project simply implements the goals and policies adopted in the City's General Plan and analyzed in the General Plan EIR. The General Plan specifically mentions revising and updating the Development Code,as shown in the following table. The Development Code shall be updated to reflect the density and LU-1.1, LU-2.2, LU-3.3, LU- intensity ranges (especially along Foothill Boulevard) as specified in 3.8, LU-4.2, LU-4.3, LU-4.5, the General Plan including updating the development standards to be LU-5.1, LU-9.5, ED-2.1, ED- consistent with the General Plan provisions. (Table LU-2 of Chapter 2) 2.4 ED-4.4 The Development Code shall be updated to develop guidelines or LU-2.4, LU-9.1, LU-9.2, LU- standards that will guide infill development and make it compatible 9.4, ED-1.4, ED-4.1 with the surrounding neighborhood communities. The proposed project does not change either the policies or the figures shown in both the EIR and the General Plan. The project does not change any densities, intensities, land uses, or designations beyond those analyzed in the EIR. As a result, there is no change in the project and no new significant environmental effects, or increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects is anticipated as a result of the proposed project. • Page 5 of 6 Item L 18 Addendum to the Rancho Cucamonga 2010 General Plan Update Environmental Impact Report Second, there have been no substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under which the • Project is undertaken that will require major revisions of the EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. The EIR, which addressed the impacts of adopting the City's General Plan and revisions to the Development Code, was adopted on May 10, 2010. The existing conditions reported in the EIR are very similar to those currently in existence. Since adoption of the General Plan in 2010, the City has not processed any amendments to the plan. As a result,there are no substantial changes to the environment which would require a modification of the EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. Third,there is no new information of substantial importance that was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the EIR was certified that shows(a)the Project will have any significant effects not discussed in the EIR; (b)the significant effects examined in the EIR will be substantially more severe than previously shown; (c) mitigation measures or alternatives previously found to be infeasible would now be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project; or (d) considerably different mitigation measures or alternatives than those analyzed in the EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment are now available. As the Project is consistent with the General Plan there are no new effects that were not discussed in the EIR. Similarly, the Project will not result in changes to the impacts identified in the EIR that could be considered substantially more severe. The Project does not alter any of the review processes in place for new projects, nor does it exempt new uses in the zoning ordinance from review. The Project addresses areas of responsibility for development review and affirms the appropriate body to make recommendations clarifies appeal procedures and establishes project review timelines. None of these • changes will result in physical changes to the environment inconsistent with the General Plan as analyzed in the EIR. No additional mitigation measures are necessary. Summary In summary,the General Plan EIR sufficiently analyzed the potential impacts associated with the proposed Development Code Update. The City has a thorough development review process that is fully documented in the General Plan EIR,and that will remain in place following the proposed project. Page 6 of 6 • Item L 19 STAFF REPORT _ • PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE: October 23, 2013 RANCHO TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission C,UCAMONGA FROM: Candyce Burnett, Planning Manager BY: Steve Fowler, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00530 - FH II - FRONTIER 12 - A request to construct 12 single-family residences on 3.6 acres of land within the Low Residential (2-4 Dwelling Units per acre) in the Etiwanda North Specific Plan, located on the southwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Vintage Drive - APN: 0225-161-13. On March 13, 2013, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was adopted by the Planning Commission for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18709. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects or minor revisions to projects within the scope of a previous Negative Declaration. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Development Review DRC2013-00530 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval and Standard Conditions. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: • A. Project Density: 3.3 Dwelling Units per acre B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Single-Family Residences - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre), Etiwanda North Specific Plan South - Single-Family Residences - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre), Etiwanda North Specific Plan East - Day Creek Boulevard and Single-Family Residences - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre), Etiwanda North Specific Plan West - Single-Family Residences - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre), Etiwanda North Specific Plan C. General Plan Desionations: Project Site - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) North - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) East - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) West - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) D. Site Characteristics: The project is located south of Vintage Drive, on the west side of Day Creek Boulevard. The project site is vacant. To the north, south, west, and east across Day Creek Boulevard, are single-family residential dwelling units. • Item M 1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2013-00530 — FRONTIER HOMES October 23, 2013 Page 2 • ANALYSIS: General: On March 13, 2013, the Planning Commission approved Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18709 for the subdivision of 3.6-acres of land into 12 single-family lots. This entitlement request is for the design and plotting of 12 single-family homes. The applicant is required to develop within substantial compliance of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan (ENSP), incorporating the architecture and design details of the Etiwanda area. Requirements include side-on garages, recessed garages, exterior siding, and specific architectural styles. Design Parameters: The site falls within the Etiwanda North Specific Plan, just outside the boundaries of the Rancho Etiwanda planned development, a 1,238-residential unit development approved by the County in May 1991, and subsequently annexed into the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The streets surrounding the project site were installed when the Rancho Etiwanda area was mass graded, infrastructure was installed, and adjacent subdivisions were built. The project site is located within the "Day Creek" neighborhood, which has its own unique architectural design guidelines per the ENSP. The ENSP requires that a mix of the following primary architectural styles be used for at least two-thirds of the units: Victorian, Country, Bungalow, or Ranch. Up to one-third of the units may use these styles: Santa Barbara Revival, Monterey, or San Juan. The proposed homes are consistent with the required architectural styles and include floor plans that range from a 2,708 square foot plan to a 3,154 square foot plan. These plans provide a large • yard area to meet the demand of the current housing market with lots ranging from 8,118 square feet to 17,833 square feet. A total of 5 (41 percent) of the proposed house product will be single-story. The two-story plan has been designed with three architectural styles. The proposed architectural styles are San Juan, Bungalow, and Country. The San Juan elevation incorporates recessed windows, decorative shutters, wrought iron details, S concrete tile roofing, and an arched patio/entryway. The Bungalow incorporates flat tile concrete roofing, stucco finish, shutters, lap siding, and stone veneer. The Country style incorporates stone veneer wainscoting, shutters, recessed windows, and accents of vertical siding in the gables along with out lookers and knee braces. Some of the plans incorporate a modest amount of wall plane articulation, and all plans incorporate decorative garage doors to match the architectural style of the home. Plan Two has a garage recessed 10 feet to meet the 30 percent requirement that houses have side-on or recessed garages. There are two points of access to the tract. One entry point is located off of Saddle Tree Place and the other point of access is off of Driftwood Place; the access point off of Driftwood Place was master planned when Tract 18032 was approved in April of 2008. The landscape along Day Creek Boulevard will match the themed landscape that is on the east side of the street with the exception of certain tree species, such as Palm trees. Because this project is within the High Fire Zone, the landscaping must be consistent with the new High Fire Zone landscape palette which does not permit Palm trees. The site will include Day Creek themed neighborhood community walls and a monument sign that matches the other three corners at the intersection of Day Creek Boulevard and Vintage Drive. The wall will be constructed using river rock battened pilasters with a concrete cap and slump stone block painted white. This is consistent with existing walls and monument signs along Day Creek Boulevard. • Item M 2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2013-00530— FRONTIER HOMES October 23, 2013 • Page 3 There will be no driveways permitted along Saddle Tree Place or along Vintage Drive. A minimum 5-foot wide setback for landscape planters is to be provided where side yards and rear yards abut a street. A. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee (Fletcher, Oaxaca, Granger) reviewed the elevations on October 1, 2013. During the meeting, the Committee requested the following changes to the architecture: • The Committee requested that the applicant add corbels to the Craftsman Bungalow style houses in the gable ends. The Committee stated that the elevations did not truly represent the Craftsmen Bungalow Style without this element. • The Committee affirmed that the applicant should keep the style of the windows consistent all the way around the two-story Craftsman Style house by continuing the style of the windows in the front to the other three elevations. • The Committee suggested that the applicant look at removing the grids in the windows of the San Juan Style house as they appeared too busy. The Committee and the applicant agreed that the applicant would make the above changes and the Design Review Committee would recommend that the project move forward to the Planning Commission. • B. Technical Review and Grading Committees: The Technical Review and Grading Committees reviewed the project on October 1, 2013, and recommended approval. C. Neighborhood Meeting: The neighborhood meeting was held on September 23, 2013, and approximately three residents attended. The residents were pleased with the size of the homes and that the vacant field will be improved. D. Environmental Assessment: On March 13, 2013, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was adopted by the Planning Commission for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18709. Staff finds, in finds, in connection with the Development Review, that substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project have not occurred, which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. The review of the architecture and plotting of the homes for the original tract map (SUBTT18709) were discussed and anticipated at the time of the original approval. Staff further finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less-than-significant. The review of this project has shown that the homes are compatible in size and plotting as the other homes in the area, and the previous subdivision (SUBTT18709) adequately analyzed and addressed the potential environmental impacts for 12 single-family dwelling units. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects or minor revisions to projects within the scope of a previous Negative Declaration. • Item M 3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2013-00530—FRONTIER HOMES October 23, 2013 Page 4 • CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. Respectfully submitted, me Candyce urnett Planning Manager DB:SF/ge Attachments: Exhibit A - Site Utilization Map Exhibit B - Elevations Exhibit C - Floor Plans Exhibit D - Grading Plans Exhibit E - Design Review Committee Action Comments, dated October 1, 2013 Draft Resolution of Approval for DRC2013-00530 • • Item M 4 s t ___ M .n '1 d.-:%: " c `Wi=t. •.�»e X. - 1 u'° < < a ♦ �� f] y �. ✓�J�+:' nqy j' ' t.. c — rlf 'i �. i � v. lJ-^„F, Tr c; ` '4'1us' '.17� 's"` - + ) � _�14 1f �if• v - Y' f � - a-e":a.- '+ r iitH.fra`t J"r tCcl + •r,•� ri r f,, 1'2 r4�i. 1 +Fs•.}i. r 1 ` "ry 7�, r a. f.... Ye w+�t Ft y :14dC.'' k. .. / y . t"�.i �'�'"'� /�a,,,�..FF.�♦� � Z. - J k M•�tv 'T�ItY1" �Ja �,y, hr �-C' ,� t.. err ( � _ R '-' 1� I 1E�k,a. . L1� e•.a . . :� +..: 46 i, lulummilp v 3 73. i K { � H' .. i- x z"§`i �' :�• '� � fir,.. m x _ A 00 , _.. ..._.. _ PLASTER RECE59'� W/METAL DETAIL CONCRETE$ 1 ROOF TILEoplill _ „ ONE ■ mm II PLASTER DETAIL TO MASONRY BUILT UP PLASTER RETURN WALL,TYP WINGWALL RICHT SIDE ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION CONCRETE S PLASTER RECESS W/ ROOFTILE PLASTER RECESS W/ METAL DETAIL ROLL UP SECTIONAL METAL DETAIL I"F GARAGE DOOR WITH GLAZING INSERTS COACX LIGXT _ ,c ,�,^ } lam; SMOOTH FINISH -! ,^��I.��ry.( 1 L '� PLASTER BEVEL ,�LI]'.�r Rn -��.. � �^. ❑P Hv _ _ _ u5��wf;,�,I� I"aq��n,,.F, DETAILING „ "—DIRECT " ■ oO 1 VENT I, — J AC UNITS STUCCO POTSHELF PLASTER LEFT SIDE ELEVATION DETAIL FRONT ELEVATION to RESIDENCE No.I / EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS "A" SCALE 114•=1a RANCHO HIGHLAND 12 i , FRONTIER FOMES R � fs Al-2 e Einge lAtChitect, ORC2013-00530 Zx I \...m...��:. I / ATTIC VENT ROOF FLAT M-T.%--T-L DETAIL OF TILE PATTERN 1JL SIDING TVP .1��■ . ■■ 'r■ ■■ ■■ ■ _ it ■■ ■ ■ � � � .� ' �� ' ■■ - STONE VENEER W/PLASTER C1p STONE VENEER BASE TO MASONRY RETURN WALL,TYR MU STUCCO CAP RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION CONCRETE FLAT ROLL UP SECTIONAL ROOF TILE GARAGE DOOR W/ XU ERS Iy GLAZING INSERTS TYPh IGN COACH C L i DI� ■■ ON o=TCT -- ■■ � �� 000000 00000 000F71 AC UNITS MORIIONTAL WOOD POTSNELF STONE VENEER BASE PATTERN W/OUTLOORERS W/STUCCO CAP LEFT SIDE ELEVATION SIDING,TYR. FRONT ELEVATION �n RESIDENCE No.I / EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS RBII SCALE RANCHO HIGHLAND 12 FRONTIER HOMES e [ R _ Al-3 e dl Ryer Are h I lecls ORC2013-00530 _ yj-t.i'T iLSi•r '3•r tt, i i.Si ..fi�ee.. �'�, `Y= frr s s£.-"�:f'=�`f �4�' *z� E. -.��rx�i,-'F'S.''��'S�'si'��'��. ��Ra;�- tJS�i �Fi '` `€�€ ♦J{ i'" r_-fm's r 'r "ifi r'fix- 'r£i• E. fc=i '*s SL vs�'Fa. ='+��s��s�i�{�srx s�y� s}4s�r5'Y��L'�� x �Yx.{�_arm x 'lkir� •�r iii-�._,y�ri� r�5�� x x-c. 7ss r a � a �S � 3-�k�:R k=.',� k:x. .-4.'F<�3�'3�3,�� 5�,k�`�^��jfiFRE'�•Fi-��s`s+4�,a.. CONCRETE FLAT HORIZONTAL GASILE END Moor T PATTERN ENTAIL gimme - r! ■� ■ lC]O � 1 CC7C� 4U C7 i Cl'CO r 8 ■U ■ �� I Ah lil: �CZt Idol TO MASONRY RETU N ALL.Tyr. RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION CONCRETE FLAT SHUTTERS.. } ` ROOF TILE3 r� TAIL COACH PATTERN . ��cc�f��ygi�-s 31�i ice. y 23s 3rvi s�' s s"`Ls s y� Tyr 00 ��i '�`�';�.. ��_ i.r�i. �s�� ❑\i=ems'=xrz-'i�3_.izzs:i...,ss�t�� Z�'v�*'t`'a* c s`,�1iL � J w:I�J�L �' c yi�, LlOO . ■ A nO ■ S� yaM ,s�r.�s..�S: 2}�/=.rte s.-�s_il,''� ■ �� ■ 0 n000 00 o r m a` �I y 1 rt Jt I .�1n 1ltOl fl��, {I� H s�tl{��I�IIi FRONT ELEVATION AN VAN IA RESIDENCE No.t / FRONT ELEVATION "A" .cAle.v.'.1.1 e RANCHO HIGHLAND 12 g c FRONTIER HOMES � a A js Al-S e din 9er A rc h l tec is ORC2013-00530 r �cm •a _ � e�. r 17 FRONT ELEVATION MAN 8 N IL•ll I. ��:yl i, FRONT ELEVATION FRONTRESIDENCE No I ACCENT COLOR FAINTED...TT... s TILE PETC q GF-.^ � _ I �f= I : � PLASTER 00 .AnD ' II RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION 1 �yT� 1, • • CONCRETE 5 PESTER PECEa6 W/ �F y •^"""""P ROOF TILE METAL DETAIL PL.STCVP MCTAL DETAIL Ilt'It:t�9Tl _ ~ - I1�-__I1I S F ■ `—T 1OCO.CN LNi li I T Al.YNITs OPLASTER TEa W YUILT- .FOAM TPI � TM F PLASTER WAINSCOTVE.T TFPLASTER BEVEL MOLL U.SECTIONAL LEFT SIDE ELEVATION DETAILIN0 FRONT ELEVATION O.RASF DOOR 1A RESIDENCE No.2/ EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS"A" .c.LE Y.-1I RANCHO HIGHLAND 12 6 FRONTIER HOMES A2-3 e d I Ag A I AIc A l l eels ORC2013-00530 ACC ENT COLOR 'PLAY'TILE R ry �LSTUCCOFOAM TRIM PLASTER OVER-- C, L :tAN ICORBELS �__ .._.. j� Y TlC II Y= HELP W/ 00 RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION �Tiz4SL' 3�. �• �o� . .ursI I� _ - 'a _r t.s sem'•. 3Ft.' ' _ 3s�zsaFYa�iVENT DETAIL MAL CONY NJ Ilmll II�11 IIIA X111 IIIIII �� J•JF3��YYJ�=1si� � � t i - - m •. I�I III_J�LJI Ir.nn�h. • w n-,a a_ go p�. '� I III� � III_a ...... ITACTI FRONTTYR A/CUN'IS \-DIRECT STONE VENEER W/PLASTER CAP--/ IN... /-ST...V......ARE ROLL UP SECTIONAL VENT TO MASONRY RETURN WALL,TIP. PDT...LlW/STUCCO LEFT • • '2 S�IT2. Wit.L?'S�L^•S.� S.•L 3:Ml- NZ S It •:sem::•e.��s_ _ '- r_ :r3:is_r�__ :,. rr__'rrti• ' 'fir--- L -- MLOU Cil J`r n. ... ILE in rit 3 �'II • 'IIC'0 I III III L "I I7�mFro oil�1L1L1J21 f'CJ�L'_ �f y� �`� �`, �-`•-�'- F if IiI- - so 4 1111 11�1_I IUI w I t � •1Y 3j '�i2 i,� 4' 7 if �s.n ami sr�T• �r� `�j y� 3� Ti--y 3 I �T -r �I�O� ui�. m SOW OCYk7 6200 00.10 r o _ IEN f 'i�a .�, �r f�_r Rif•"_, _'�� i.� —��:�t , !S r�f.'pLI� IT�y3T_iele�3r:•y:•�'�- .: IY,— ��fj • rt (D FRONT ELEVATION sm] m 2A RESIDENCE No.2 FRONT ELEVATION "A" SCALE.1/4-�I.W RANCHO HIGHLAND 12 ...TIER HOMES A2-5 C dtnger A ,C h, t,c is DRCZO 13-00530 _ q i r.JK MI J ., � II I.az�� Ili : i`? >• r--��- ��`�'�yli �"`"yy-,�� ..`limon r.nyty- `C 1 1 4 Itl LlL i I . A J�� I '•��.L4r I I �• f r.�: rl: 1 •L.f.•.tl a� i. r_{�a Y�� /l r �. 4V�` ! � a � �l1 r�cK`� 1 ' r •rt w� � .._- . .. _ 1,�1 � � A f. �5�' ham. i'� 1�� ; r / t �� . . 1, _ l"".� I :°J .��Q Sy,� F�� •i �Lli [Jr i� .� � '�C 1 J.i 1 FRONT • FRONT m x50'-0" (TOTAL BUILDING WIDTH) 2 W i— _- ❑1 -- ,� FNOOK, I I GR ET R00141 MASTER BEDROOM 1—, L Ll 7KITCH EN � \` •�/\• I � � L i n..• � j..�... .•....• ••.. MASTER O U BATH 2 - k-k ---- - _ �-- -- W 1@I elate R'LL Ali wxLrc-In '�'_- O m T-�II"il I-- < PWD I F BEDROOM 2 O L6UNDRv_ ..t_{ _ Q BATH V1 / ENTRY ti �-ht- , i e11�Ih�iNrs�1' Ii I1:YLLiEII{Iq.1{ �. ❑ 2�AR GAR�.GE m 3o'o xao' """•' BEDROO M�3 I BE aROgM•4 ❑ II ------------------------- RESIDENCE No.1 / 2.708 S.F. RANCHO HIGHLAND 12 £ - FRONTIER HOMES z ^ Al-1 edingerA eehileels DRC2013-00530 50'-0e I e., I : I : : �I(��• (A�� r ---r SFS �> ,"^ 1 C BE 4 ORO M.3 BEI,%07= %0 l \, BNTR 2 ��•'q'a a-. MASTER BEDROOM Jl :FI Fi,{, A/c UN.,4 �e - - \ 11 �- y K �- SUPEP AM ROOM HALL ITC 1 1 _ xl I PT 4DROOM A. '�.•.._ __ LOFT/OPT S - I^ -C-:—I F r BEDROOM 5 y ,,.,n - y - LOO�n^ OPT. EN/OPT. ILNORY IS-J R 11 Y ,� � u^[x �- I e - p6 ALIROOM S •x R MASTER BATH [a '" S IT AR GwR G Gox:umn WING ROOM n^ COVERED W/ O DZMOPA�E �Ig' ,R I COV EROEO PATIO 1 z ---' r? ENiR X11.. Via.�T ' ' L-1 r _ L VIN. ROOM ;� __________________________ a�O YY ro :1 l�i0 RESIDENCE No.2/3,154 S.F. 5[cowo F[ooR-I.SYO Rr SCALE 114-1e F:ReT 1L 1.36^er RANCHO HIGHLAND 12 £ _ FRONTIER HOMES 5 s A2-1 ° ' a E:0 g e,A I C h:I e c I a DRC201 3-00530 - - - - - - - - - - HALL DEN I 1 L Ica'x Io'-e I BATH 3 OPTION 1 r- I - - - - - — - - - I DEN OPTION r_ (1 L O SUPER FAMILY ROOM) HALL ' BEOOROOM 5 � ' I - I - L (D I ? BEDROOM 5OPTION IBQ8GOa6 . (I.L.O.BOPER FAMILY ) 1-1I 71 iL�l a� +il•ILI n" O STORAGE BEDROOM 4 ,', ^+x 1 J �`-'•� >� BEDROOM 6 OPTION (+181 S.F.) (I L 0 TANDEM CAR SPACE) BED 4 OPTION O.L. LOFT) RESIDENCE No.2/ 3,154 S.F. p RANCHO AH I GHLAND 12 e_ FRONTIER HOMES , R At A2-2 cdingcrArchllc cts DRC2013-00530 -------177 - -_- -- - - - - - -,a I � _ ' vlxrAoe oxm- 3, I . - - - - - - -rSI�- p ' o how i I _ uceuxR onlv_e ----------- lo i --- _—•_— 6 —_`- _�-a� __ �J�J a =u 8:.'o°"K`.e.�ow 1- 1 -- ----- ----- = vt TJ{:ia4 rnurr NryE�OW coxeraurnox xmes eAxnexrorx ouAxnnu rn•ee�s •°r ue�a IX x rwrxc wit ��, w 'w �•, •,•. �� -� w lm rnvuuae)nroeeunox p�..e�e��..�. /��..,m •_ r-+�—I = ® s•.o.. e a =_�� LTJ Imo.. I anff wnn arPM mnxo ew �'""�""� "� rrel••,eul�x°°Ir°xu°x° �nri rtc�auwa xix 0 -��•� DETAIL -"U*CHANNEL .: .uc .•w SEC I'IONPF-F ewo uro K wrz m RwM[:LW.fA U 9:)JO e.art xo I�sl)w-ewe SECTION AA SECTION B-B SECTION GC DETA W-TVP ALL LOTS fD 3 3 r. vias: SECTION D-D SECTION E-E LACEBARK DRIVE Orth RYGOOfvOOe r 111ILf Iq W OOMf81U SM(lg SR1[!F]fL/N SELiIOnS av¢mie IaMcl Nk,M R gmBIIHs r. ® vm wu rta K$vau `00 exo unu ai vrt m — PYpW GIUMiY/A 4 911P -r-r ry a..r _t_ WrtK� rtwn �xo Iswl eH-ene ZZ W wail - "DO"TRIED PL�CE t-'_-___-___ ___ _-_-.____- _- i 1-77 i . , P it a i s --------- ---------- ------------ --- s -- —ao .. ... e i i i .I i Pi L j j } Oki pv L----------- i ft i �',f�• I to t� , I " Ifi�I ' �' Jul � a E4Y CEEEM lLVO. 1 ;ti —6 _—_—_g—_—_y— __—_ �� a�� a•f� , � � §psi � a�,i a � � . 'I'vii q i ii€IeEeE:iei @� a S @��f i# ae �64j;' Ss5'v tP� pi��ES '`�p � s — { S a i "E& i`31 ii ilii iadiEiil i 9 $ _ •.``� f . — 1 t fill f99 � 0 E 7 s P+ ' ISITE immommi �I : ,.7% -6---- _ g y • � - � � 1 _0 �'';•'�] I i LEOLL DEECIUTOM •f h M.V w..•u 1 u ' • � i I ' n i . JS — r_;i_—_ cEaano � ewNnewawN ss ..... urPeec scut anvE�NolacwEEEae, I Ywwcr Nu tnm CUf I ial 1111E OA¢OIW IC[x) iNMIP PRNMHS �. EYA VIU.KK YAR%91 o W[M OYwd d 91 gnlCl Au Rem _ exile eo Ime)ss.-ewe • • 0 2LOT 11 UrTmo : `FVCINITY MAP T" LOT 7 PROJECT INFORMATION -2W 1111 TV till J/l LEGAL DESCRIPTION BENCHMARK IPI It LOT 1 LOT 2 Of'3 LOT 4 4�1 OT5 LOT AREAS It SITE AREAS oLIM [OT COVERAGE I INFORMATION 0, millW&E. WQ PL iEND F—I LEGEND 3 CTION C SECTION F F WOUP EG W. .11 I pill Lil )II -- — -- — — — - — — — SECT �A"11 IC N B-\B --,"VINTAGE DRIVE ----------- PLAN 2 OAI ............ PLAN 1 0 - ea L----: 0 TYPICAL FRONT YARD PLANTING V Ly� r OVERALL SITE PLAN AND WALL AND FENCING PLAN = -:-::---7�- �:=-- ......... 2.... D Ac W- TYPICAL SLOPE PLANTING V=20--O- mcmum" .1. Cbmla TR 18709 RANCHO 12 CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN L A N D S C A P E 310 e0e1x I�IT I 1�x, FCNIr T 1�1 1�1 1 l�l I I 1,� PREPARED FOR FRONTIER ENTERPRISES DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS • 7:00 p.m. Steve Fowler October 1, 2013 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00530 - FH II - FRONTIER 12 - A request to construct 12 single-family residences on 3.6 acres of land within the Low Residential (24 Dwelling Units per acre) in the Etiwanda North Specific Plan, located on the southwest comer of Day Creek Boulevard and Vintage Drive - APN: 0225-161-13. On March 13, 2013, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was adopted by the Planning Commission for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18709. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects or minor revisions to projects within the scope of a previous Negative Declaration. Background: On March 13, 2013, the Planning Commission approved Tentative Tract Map 18709 for the subdivision of 12 lots on 3.6 acres within the Low Residential District (24 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan, located on the southwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Vintage Drive. At the time of the subdivision, no housing product was proposed. The site falls within the Etiwanda North Specific Plan, just outside the boundaries of the Rancho Etiwanda planned development, a 1,238-residential unit development approved by the County in May 1991 and subsequently annexed into the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The streets surrounding the project site were installed when the Rancho Etiwanda area was mass graded, infrastructure was installed, and the adjacent subdivisions were built. The site is bordered by single-family homes to the north, west, and across Day Creek Boulevard. To the south is the SR-210 Freeway. • Design Parameters: The applicant is required to develop within substantial compliance with the Etiwanda North Speck Plan (ENSP) Day Creek Neighborhood, incorporating the architecture and design details of the Etiwanda area. This project includes 12 homes. Requirements include side-on garages, recessed garages, and exterior siding. The specific architectural styles shall include enough materials, elements, and details that reflect the character of the style. The "Day Creek" neighborhood, which has its own unique architectural design guidelines per the ENSP, requires that a mix of the following primary architectural styles be used for at least two-thirds of the units: Bungalow, Ranch, Country, or Victorian. Up to one-third of the units may use these styles: Santa Barbara Revival, Monterey, or San Juan. The proposed homes are consistent with the required architectural styles and include floor plans that range from a 2,708 square foot plan to a 3,154 square foot plan. These plans provide a large yard area to meet the demand of the current housing market with lots ranging from 8,118 square feet to 17,833 square feet. A total of 5 (41 percent) of the proposed homes will be single-story. The two-story plan has been designed with three architectural styles. The proposed architectural styles are San Juan, Bungalow, and Country. The San Juan elevation incorporates recessed windows, decorative shutters, wrought iron details, S concrete tile roofing, and an arched patio/entryway. The Bungalow incorporates flat tile concrete roofing, stucco finish, shutters, lap siding, and stone veneer. The Country style incorporates stone veneer wainscoting, shutters, recessed windows, and accents of vertical siding in the gables along with out lookers and knee braces. Some of the plans incorporate a modest amount of wall plane articulation, and all plans incorporate decorative garage doors to match the architectural style of the home. Plan two has a garage recessed 10 feet to meet the 30 percent requirement that houses have side-on or recessed garages. �XHIBIT E Item M 26 DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTION AGENDA DRC2013-00530— FH 11— FRONTIER 12 October 1, 2013 Page 2 • Access into the housing tract is accomplished at two points. One point off Saddle Tree Place and the other off of Driftwood Place, which was master planned when Tract 18032 was approved in April of 2008. The landscape along Day Creek Boulevard will match the themed landscape that is on the east side of the street except it will not have certain varieties of trees such as Palms because they are not allowed within the new High Fire Zone permitted landscape material. The site will include Day Creek themed neighborhood community walls and a monument sign that matches the other three comers at the intersection of Day Creek Boulevard and Vintage Drive. The wall has river rock battened pilasters with a concrete cap and slump stone block painted white. This is consistent with the Etiwanda North Specific Plan requirements along Day Creek Boulevard. There will be no driveways permitted along Saddle Tree Place or along Vintage Drive. A minimum 5-foot wide setback for landscape planters is to be provided where side yards and rear yards abut a street. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for the Committee discussion regarding this project. Major Issues: The applicant worked hard with staff to follow the criteria outlined in the Development Code. There are no major issues regarding this project at this time. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues: There are no secondary issues regarding this project at this time. Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be • incorporated into the project design without discussion: 1. Boulders from the project site shall be utilized and integrated as part of the front yard Landscape Plan, per the Master Plan Resolution of Approval. 2. The driveways shall be colored and scored in a diagonal pattern for additional entryway detail. 3. Coach lights shall match the architectural style of the residence around the exterior of the residence. Staff recommendation: Staff recommends that the Design Review Committee recommend approval of this application to the Planning Commission. Desian Review Committee Action: The Committee members reviewed the project and requested that the applicant address the following issues: • The Committee requested that the applicant add corbels to the Craftsman Bungalow themed houses in the gable ends. The Committee stated that the elevations did not truly represent the Craftsmen Bungalow style without this element. • Item M 27 DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTION AGENDA DRC2013-00530 — FH II — FRONTIER 12 October 1, 2013 • Page 3 • The Committee affirmed that the applicant should keep the style of the windows consistent all the way around the two-story Craftsman Style house by continuing the style of the windows in the front to the other three elevations. • The Committee suggested that the applicant look at removing the girds in the windows of the San Juan Style house as they appeared too busy. The Committee and the applicant agreed that the applicant would make the above changes and the Design Review Committee would recommend the project move forward to Planning Commission. Members Present: Fletcher, Oaxaca, Granger Staff Planner. Steve Fowler • • Item M 28 RESOLUTION NO. 13-51 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00530 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF 12 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCES ON 3.6ACRES OF LAND WITHIN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT OF THE ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD AND VINTAGE DRIVE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 0225-161-13. A. Recitals. 1. FHI I, LLC filed an application for the approval of Development Review DRC2013-00530, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution,the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 23rd day of October 2013, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning • Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting on October 23, 2013, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to the property located at the southwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Vintage Drive with a street frontage of approximately 302 feet and lot depth of approximately 531 feet and is presently vacant land; and b. The properties to the north of the subject site across Vintage Drive are existing single-family residences;the properties to the south consist of existing single-family residences;the properties to the east across Day Creek Boulevard are existing single-family residences; and the properties to the west across Saddle Tree Place are existing single-family residences; and C. The project consists of a Development Review of 12 lots; and d. The project conforms to the basic Development Standards of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan with required architectural elevations, slope requirements, and overall project density. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 • and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: Item M 29 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 51 DRC2013-00530— FRONTIER HOMES October 23, 2013 Page 2 • a. The proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan by providing a variety of housing units that are compatible with the surrounding area; and b. The proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located by adhering to all setback, height,and density regulations that govern the area where these homes are being constructed; and C. The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code in that single-family residences are an approved use within the Low Residential Zoned District; and d. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application,the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA")and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration in March 13, 2013, in connection with the City's approval of Tentative Tract Map 18709. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines • Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project unless: (i) substantial changes are proposed to the project that indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment; (ii)substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicates new or more severe environmental impacts;or(iii)new important information shows the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered; or (iv) additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts. b. The Planning Commission finds, in connection with the Development Review,that substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project have not occurred which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. The review of the architecture and plotting of the homes for the original tract map (SUBTT18709) were discussed and anticipated at the time of the original approval. Staff further finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less-than-significant. The review of this project has shown that the homes are compatible in size and plotting as the other homes in the area, and the previous subdivision (SUBTT18709) adequately analyzed and addressed the potential environmental impacts for 12 single-family dwelling units. C. Based on these findings and all evidence in the record, the Planning Commission concurs with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required pursuant to CEQA in connection with the City's consideration of the Development Review DRC2013-00530. • Item M 30 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO, 51 DRC2013-00530— FRONTIER HOMES October 23, 2013 Page 3 • 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) Approval is for the Development Review of 12 single-family homes within Tract 18709. Changes to the plotting, architecture, landscape, or Grading Plan shall require review and approval by the Planning Department. 2) The applicant shall adhere to all conditions of approval for SUBTT18709. 3) The applicant shall implement all mitigation measures adopted for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18709, as shown in Planning Commission Resolution No. 13-0. 4) The applicant shall pay an in lieu of fee of$1,000.00 for the 12 lots that do not exceed 20,000 square feet within the Equestrian Overlay per the Etiwanda North Specific Plan. 5) Boulders from the project site shall be utilized and integrated as part of • the front yard landscape plan, per the Master Plan Resolution of Approval. 6) Man doors leading from the garage to the rear yard shall be raised panel to compliment the architectural style of the residence. 7) Coach light styles that are utilized in the front of the homes shall also be utilized around the rest of the house to compliment the architectural style of the residence. 8) The driveways that do not use pavers shall be scored in a horizontal pattern for additional entryway detail. Engineering Services Department 1) All pertinent conditions of approval of Planning Commission Resolution No. 13-11 approving Tentative Tract Map 18709 shall apply. Grading 1) The applicant shall provide a copy of EPA Form 7520-16(Inventory of Injection Wells) with the Facility ID Number assigned to the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of the Grading Permit for any underground Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Best • Management Practices (BMPs) deeper than 10 feet. Item M 31 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 51 DRC2013-00530— FRONTIER HOMES October 23, 2013 Page 4 • 2) The conditions of approval for SUBTT18709 are in effect for this project. 3) Prior to removing fences or walls along common lot lines and prior to constructing walls along common lot lines, the applicant shall provide a letter from the adjacent property owner(s) allowing work on the adjacent property. 4) The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project.All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 5) Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit, the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID). 6) A Grading Bond will be required to be submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval prior to issuance of a Grading Permit. 7) Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit, the City of Rancho • Cucamonga Planning Services Department shall approve the project Landscape Architecture Plan. The Landscaping Plan shall be in conformance with a project approved Water Quality Management Plan. 8) Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit,the applicant shall submit the Codes, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) to the Engineering Services Department for approval. The CC&Rs shall include a listing of the "Restricted Activities" referenced in the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), Page 16 "Justification for Source Control BMPs not incorporated into the project WQMP." 9) Prior to the issuance of the Grading Permit, the applicant shall provide a letter from Cucamonga Valley Water District(CVWD) noting that the public sewer and water plans are 90 percent (or better) completed. 10) All proposed walls along the south property line of the Tract shall be designed so as to not add any loading surcharges onto existing retaining walls for Tract 18032. 11) Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit, the grading plans shall provide a specification to fill-in the existing weep holes along the existing common block wall with Tract 18032 (as shown on the Grading Plan PMT2011-00556). All storm water discharges shall be conveyed through the subject Tract and shall not discharge onto any adjacent private lots within Tract 18032. • Item M 32 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 51 DRC2013-00530— FRONTIER HOMES October 23, 2013 Page 5 • 12) A Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) was approved and the Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan was recorded on September 18, 2013. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF OCTOBER 2013. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Frances Howdyshell, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary 1, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed,and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,at a regular meeting of the Planning • Commission held on the 23rd day of October 2013, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: • Item M 33 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT#: DRC2013-00530 SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICANT: FHII, LLC SOUTHWEST CORNER OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD AND VINTAGE DRIVE - LOCATION: APN: 0225-161-13 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General Requirements Completion Date 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. 13-51, Standard _/_/_ Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 3. The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below. _/_/_ The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Manager hearing. a) Notice of Exemption -$50 X B. Time Limits 1. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. • 1 Item M 34 Project No. DRC2013-00530 Completion Date C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which _/_/_ • include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, the Development Code regulations, and the Etiwanda North Specific Plan. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager. 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Services Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance and final acceptance granted prior to occupancy. 4. Revised Site Plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Planning Manager review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 7. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of • concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 8. Street names shall be submitted for Planning Manager review and approval in accordance with the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map 9. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a Gear and concise manner, including proper illumination and in conformance with Building and Safety Services Department standards, the Municipal Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department (RCFD)Standards. 10. Where corner side, interior side or rear yard property lines are adjacent to local equestrian trails, construct minimum 6-foot high decorative masonry walls. Decorative masonry shall mean split-face double sided block, 'slump stone' or an alternative material that is acceptable to the Design Review Committee. 11. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall not prohibit the keeping the equine animals where zoning requirements for the keeping of said animals have been met. Individual lot owners in subdivisions shall have the option of keeping said animals without the necessity of appealing to boards of directors of homeowners' associations for amendments to the CC&Rs. 12. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Services Department and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer. The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Department a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said • information changes. 2 Item M 35 Project No. DRC2013-00530 Completion Date 13. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property • owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Manager and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 14. Solar access easements shall be dedicated for the purpose of assuming that each lot or dwelling unit shall have the right to receive sunlight across adjacent lots or units for use of a solar energy system. The easements may be contained in a Declaration of Restrictions for the subdivision which shall be recorded concurrently with the recordation of the final map or issuance of permits, whichever comes first. The easements shall prohibit the casting of shadows by vegetation, structures, fixtures, or any other object, except for utility wires and similar objects. 15. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for Planning Manager and Engineering Services Department approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. 16. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. The developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owners at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/fences along the project perimeter. 17. Construct block walls between homes (i.e., along interior side and rear property lines), _/—/— rather than wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency. 18. Access gates to the rear yards shall be constructed from a material more durable than wood gates. Acceptable materials include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC. 19. For residential development, return walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry. 20. Slope fencing along side property lines may be wrought iron or black plastic coated chain link to maintain an open feeling and enhance views. 21. On corner side yards, provide minimum 5-foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk. The 5-foot wall/fence setback and the parkway shall have landscape and irrigation in addition to the required street trees. Detailed landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning Manager review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. The parkway landscaping including trees, shrubs, ground covers and irrigation shall be maintained by the property owner. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the parkway maintenance requirement, in a standard format as determined by the Planning Manager, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 22. Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock. Other stone veneers may be manufactured products. 23. Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours. 24. The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and in no event shall trash and debris remain for more than 24 hours. D. Building Design 1. All dwellings shall have the front, side and rear elevations upgraded with architectural treatment, detailing and increased delineation of surface treatment subject to Planning • Manager review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. 3 Item M 36 Project No. DRC2013-00530 Completion Date 2. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections shall be screened from all sides and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent • properties and streets as required by the Planning Department. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically more than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet, shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent nature with the building design and is detailed consistent with the building. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically less than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet shall be painted consistent with the color scheme of the building. Details shall be included in building plans. 3. For all residential development, provide conduit from each unittlot and a pull box to connect to the street. Provide interior structured wiring for each house/building with minimum Category 5 copper wire, Radio Grade 6 coaxial cable, and a central distribution panel, prior to release of occupancy (fiber-to-the building, FTTB). Plans shall be submitted for Planning Manager and Building Official review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. E. Landscaping 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Manager review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. For development occurring in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, the landscape plans will also be reviewed by Fire Construction Services. 2. All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than 2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground • cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 3. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 4. For single-family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Department to determine that they are in satisfactory condition. 5. Front yard and corner side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be required per the Development Code. This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting. 6. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Manager review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Services Department. • 4 Item M 37 Project No. DRC2013-00530 Completion Date 7. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on • the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 8. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Services Department. 9. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water efficient landscaping per Development Code Chapter 17.82. F. Environmental 1. Noise levels shall be monitored after construction to verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. Noise levels shall be monitored by actual noise level readings taken on-and off- site. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for Planning Manager review and approval prior to final occupancy release. The final report shall also make recommendations as to additional mitigation measures to reduce noise levels to below City standards, such as, residential exterior noise levels to below 60 dBA and interior noise attenuation to below 45 dBA. 2. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for Planning Manager review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report. 3. The applicant shall submit certification from an acoustical engineer that all recommendations of the acoustical report were implemented in construction, including measurements of interior and exterior noise levels to document compliance with City • standards. Certification shall be submitted to he Building and Safety Services Department and the Planning Department prior to final occupancy release of the affected homes. 4. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Manager in the amount of $ 581 prior to the issuance of Building Permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. G. Other Agencies 1. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to Planning Manager review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY SERVICES DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S). H. Building and Safety VHFHSZ Tract Standard Conditions • NOTE: The construction of this tract must be in accordance with the approved Fire Protection Plan and/or the California Building; this tract is located in the VHFHSZ. 5 Item M 38 Project No. DRC2013-00530 Completion Date General Requirements 1. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: • a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan and reverse foundation plan (when applicable); C. Floor Plan; d. Roof and Floor Framing Plan and reverse Roof and Floor Framing Plan (when applicable); e. Electrical Plans(2 sets, detached) including the size of main switch, number and size .of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and g. Planning Department Project Number (DRC2013-00530) clearly identified on the outside of all plans. 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, two sets of energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance. 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. 5. Developers wishing to participate in the Community Energy Efficiency Program (CEEP)can _/_/_ • contact the Building and Safety Services Department staff for information and submittal requirements. Site Development 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. Al plans shall be marked with the project file number (DRC2013-00530). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Services Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of Building Permits for a new residential project or major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, and School Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Services Department prior to permit issuance. 3. The Building and Safety Official shall provide street addresses after tract/parcel map recordation and prior to issuance of Building Permits. 4. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. • 6 Item M 39 Project No. DRC2013-00530 Completion Date New Structures • 1. Provide compliance with the California Residential/Code Building Code (CBC/CRC) for —/—/— property line clearances considering use, area, and fire-resistive construction. 2. Construction of the home must be in accordance with the approved Fire protection Plan —/—/— and/or Chapter 7A of the CBC; this tract is located in the VHFHSZ. 3. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. —/ /- 4. The structures in this tract must be equipped with automatic fire sprinkler in accordance with —/—/— the approved Fire protection Plan and The California Residential Code. 5. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's"high wind" instructions. —/—/— APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: I. Security Lighting 1. All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle —/—/— power. These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo censored cell. 2. All buildings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the —/—/— buildings, with direct lighting to be provided by all entryways. The lighting shall be consistent around the entire development. 3. The lighting in exterior areas shall be in vandal-resistant fixtures. —/—/— �. Security Hardware 1. A secondary locking device shall be installed on all sliding glass doors. —/—/- 2. One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors. If windows are —/—/— within 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used. 3. All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices. —/—/— K. Windows 1. All sliding glass windows shall have secondary locking devices and should not be able to be —/—/— lifted from frame or track in any manner. 2. Security/burglar bars are not recommended, particularly in residences, due to the delay or —/—/— prevention of a speedy evacuation in case of fire. L. Building Numbering 1. Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for —/—/— nighttime visibility. • 7 Item M 40 Project No. DRC2013-00530 Completion Date M. Alarm Systems 1. Install a burglar alarm system and a panic alarm if needed. Instructing management and —/—/— • employees on the operation of the alarm system will reduce the amount of false alarms and in turn save dollars and lives. 2. Alarm companies shall be provided with the 24-hour Sheriffs dispatch number: —/—/— (909) 941-1488. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: The project must comply in design and constructed in accordance with the 2010 California Building and Fire Codes, the RCFPD Ordinance FD50 and the RCFPD Standards. The RCFPD ordinance, procedures & standards which are referenced in this document can be access on the web at www.citvofrc.us. N. Fire Conditions for Single-Family Tracts/Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply 1. Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants: The following provides design guidelines for the —/—/— spacing and location of fire hydrants: a. For single-family residential projects in the designated Hazardous Fire Area, the fire hydrant design & installation shall be in accordance to RCFPD Policies and Standards. b. If any portion of a facility or building is located more than 150 feet from a public fire hydrant measured on an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, • additional private or public fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided. C. Provide one fire hydrant for each 1000 gpm of required fire flow or fraction thereof. FSC-2 Fire Flow 1. The required fire flow for this project will be determined in gallons per minute at a minimum —/—/— residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch. This requirement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix B, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances. The Fire flow has been established in the approved FPP 2. Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed project may be used to —/—/— provide the required fire flow subject to Fire District review and approval. Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow. 3. Fire service plans are required for all projects that must extend the existing water supply to —/—/— or onto the site. Building Permits will not be issued until fire service plans are approved. On all Site Plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed project site. FCS-3 Fire Access Roadway 1. Public and private roads shall be improved as approved by the fire district in the Fire /—/— Protection plan before an occupancy release can be granted by the Fire District • 8 Item M 41 Project No. DRC2013-00530 Completion Date FSC-4 Hazardous Fire Area • This project is located within the "State Responsibility Area" (SRA), the "Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone" (VHFHSZ), City of Rancho Cucamonga "Hillside District", and/or within the area identified on the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan, Exhibit V-7 as High Probability-High Consequence for Fire Risk. These locations have been determined to be within the "Hazardous Fire Area" as defined by the Fire District. The Hazardous Fire Area is based on maps produced by the California Department of Forestry as adopted by the RCFPD. 1. Hazard Reduction Plans: The applicant shall prepare a Fire Protection Plan and obtain approval of the plan by RCFPD. The FPP addresses the following: a. Fire protection water supply b. Fire resistive non-combustible roof assemblies c. Fuel Modification by vegetation management d. Fire District access roadways e. Ignition resistive construction and protection of openings f. Fire sprinkler systems g. Fire flow criteria h. For construction requirements in the "Hazard Fire Area" refer to the current editions of the CBC Chapter 7A, The California Residential Code, the RCFPD Ordinance, and the applicable, standards and policies. 2. The architectural plans for the construction of the buildings must be in accordance with the current editions of the CBC Chapter 7A, The California Residential Code, the RCFPD Ordinance, the applicable standards and policies, the County of San Bernardino's • Development Code and the approved Fire Protection Plan. 3. Mobile, stationary or portable power-operated equipment in the Hazardous Fire Area shall not be used without the Fire Safety Division's written approval. Specific fire protection measures that may be required to mitigate the hazard include, but are not limited to: a. A stand-by water tender, equipped with a pump,fire hose and nozzle. b. Pre-wetting of the site to avoid the production of sparks between blades or tracks and rocks. c. Conducting a fire watch for a minimum of one-hour following the cessation of operations each day. d. For welding, cutting or grinding work, dear away all combustible material from the area around such operation for a minimum distance of 10-feet. A "hot-work" permit must be obtained from Fire Construction Services prior to cutting, welding or grinding work. e. Maintain one serviceable round point shovel with an overall length of not less than forty-six (46) inches and one five(5) gallon backpack water pump-type fire extinguisher fully equipped and ready for use at the immediate area during the operation. FCS-5 Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit the applicant shall record the approved Fire Protection plan with the county's recorded office. FCS-6 Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the property must be inspected and accepted by the Fire District staff. Schedule the inspection with Fire Construction Services at 909-477-2713. FSC-7 Single-family Residential Sales Model homes require approved Fire District vehide access • and water supply from a public or private water main system before construction. 9 Item M 42 Project No. DRC2013-00530 Completion Date FCS-8 Fire Sprinklers: The Current editions of Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Ordinance, the —/—/— California Residential Code and/or any other applicable standards require an approved automatic fire • sprinkler system to be installed in all Buildings with R and U occupancy fire areas. All structures must be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers in accordance with NFPA 13D, 13R or 13. FCS-9 Annexation of the parcel map: Annexation of the parcel into the Community Facilities —/—/— District#85-1 or#88-1 is required prior to the issuance of grading or Building Permits. FSC-10 Alternate Method Application: Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will review all requests for alternate method, when submitted. The request must be submitted on the Fire District "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the review fee. Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION–Please complete the following: 1. Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating —/—/— the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers". On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location. 2. Private Fire Hydrants: For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in —/—/— the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on-site fire hydrants. The underground fire line contractor, developer, and/or owner are responsible for hiring the company to perform the test. A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available. The fire flow available must meet or exceed the required fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code. • 3. Fire Sprinkler System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler _/—/— system(s)shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. 4. Fire sprinkler monitoring must be installed tested and final by FCS. 5. Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire —/—/— access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services. The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways. 6. Address: Prior to the granting of occupancy, single-family dwellings shall post the address —I—/— with noncombustible 4-inch tall numbers on a contrasting background. The numbers shall be internally or externally illuminated during periods of darkness. The numbers shall be visible from the street. When building setback from the public roadway exceeds 100-feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry. 7. The Fire Protection Plan: The approved plans shall be recorded with the county recorder's office. 8. Vegetation Management: The landscaping shall be installed and/or modified in accordance with approved FPP and or the RCFPD Standard. 9. All requirements of the FPP or the RCFPD Standard must be completed before an —/—/— • occupancy release may be granted. 10 Item M 43 Design Review h . / , / DEVELOPA REQUEST TO 12 SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES tti I I Agenda • History • Zoning • Elevations • Recommendation } _Lf.:d i ol f - r I � y f -1 FOR { PF 4f, 71,10 o ... I / ice `// , r 1 Zoning • Low Residential • Etiwanda North Specific Plan • Etiwanda Day Creek themed neighborhood q - _ y � y M RD Zoning n. -K CA19 elm �iii� ��I�I�1��• Iiiiil � •Y. � ' r Standard Requirements ALFDAiAI� • 7,200 Square Foot Minimum Net Lot Size • The smallest lot is 7,671 and the largest is 16,805 square feet • 10,000 Square Foot Minimum Net Average Lot Area • Lots in the tract will average approximately 10, 135 square feet • 100 foot Minimum Depth • 65 foot Minimum Average Width, 70 foot Minimum width at corners i n / � J Tract Map L= M : � • ` TRACT CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO oSTATE OF .• �r— ,�. .� r r s�.�.¢.� _�•_�_•.� cru---.uc�� l I r. Standard Requirements MDWA • 30 Percent single-story — 5 Residences 41 % • 30 Percent recessed or side-on garages — 7 Residences 59% • Houses range from 2 , 708 to 3, 154 square feet • Primary architectural styles: Bungalow, Ranch , Country or Victorian . • Secondary architectural styles: Santa Barbara Revival , Monterey, or San Juan Site Map b LOT 7 LOT 6 jL ,y r♦ 1` r� �I lil I n I Single - StoryElevations • San Juan r, ITi MXI FIEVAICN _µuw./.� ✓��,4. cSM��i.}t.r�Y , • Bungalow A flM1E1FVA11gi • Country 9 � v Single - Story Elevations a e vim_ c • San Juan — Concrete S roof tile � -© — Plaster recess w/ metal detail — Stucco pot shelf — Recessed windows �IN ti Single -StoryElevations Bungalow — Concrete flat roof the — Stone veneer — Horizontal siding pattern in gables — Shutters � � n • e� l �'I FEt:ro �� oc0000 oma; GCJL]00 Single-Story Elevations P • Country — Concrete flat roof tile 6: 12 ' — Stone veneer — Horizontal siding pattern in gables — Shutters FF 1 EW m_ Two -Story El . • IJ "MUM San Juan C. Bungalow Country r»7 7-� s Two -Story Elevations ■�IlA I • San Juan — Concrete S roof the L — Windows with no grids — Iron pot shelves — Shutters it LMI i Two -Story Elevations C ' • Bungalow r . — Concrete flat roof the � .._ — Pot shelves — Horizontal siding — Shutters t �� yL r J r.. Two -Story Elevations • Country — Concrete flat roof the — Stone veneer — Balcony — Outlookers � `N a s; i� h �-MRecommendation �F 1 Approve Design Review DRC2013-00530 with conditions IF kW N �ii�'�- �� ,3��i 1►s't' , 11,11_ kki , /��\ SIGN-IN SHEET L—•�� PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING RANCHO October 23 2013 CUCAMONGA ' NAME COMPANY ADDRESS/EMAIL