Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2013-11-13 - Agenda Packet - HPC / PC
• THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA THE REGULAR MEETINGS OF P�+NCHO CUCAMONGA THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION NOVEMBER 13, 2013 - 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER • Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call Chairman Howdyshell _ Vice Chairman Fletcher_ Munoz_ Wimberly_ Oaxaca II. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Historic Preservation Commission or Planning Commission, not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. III. CONSENT CALENDAR/HISTORIC PRESERVATION • COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA WNCHo NOVEMBER 13, 2013 °N°A Page 2 A. Approval of minutes dated October 23, 2013 IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS/PLANNING COMMISSION The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required bylaw. The Chairman will open the public hearing to receive testimony. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. Please sign in after speaking. B. TIME EXTENSION DRC2013-00811- CCI LOT 9 HAVEN LLC C/O DREW WILLOCK - A request for a 2-year time extension for a previously approved project (Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00464) to expand the Haven Village commercial center with two multi- tenant retail buildings with a drive-thru totaling 6,484 square feet on a 41,821 square foot site in the Neighborhood Commercial (NC) Development District, located at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and the 210 Freeway - APN: 0201-272-23. The Planning Commission determined that the project was categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)and the City CEQA Guidelines pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 In-Fill Development Projects. Per Section 15162, no • further environmental review is required as there are no changes to the project. C. ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT DRC2013-00563 - STEVE RAWLINGS FOR 909 SPORTS GRILL INC. -A request to provide live entertainment comprised of karaoke, live bands, and dancing within an existing restaurant of about 5,300 square feet in the Industrial Park (IP) District, Industrial Commercial Overlay District(ICOD), located at 11849 Foothill Boulevard, Unit A; APN: 0229-012-22. Related file: Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-00673. Staff has determined this project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City CEQA Guidelines pursuant to Section 15301 - Existing Facilities. No further environmental review is required. D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19448 - MIG/HOGLE-IRELAND FOR GOODMAN RANCHO SPE, LLC - A review of a tentative parcel map in conjunction with a proposal to construct two(2)industrial warehouse buildings of 555,664 square feet(Building 1/Phase 1)and 1,033,565 square feet(Building 2/Phase 2) on a property comprised of three(3) parcels with a combined area of 3,255,834 square feet (74.7 acres)which is currently developed with a concrete pipe manufacturing/storage facility (operated by Ameron International) in the Heavy Industrial (HI) District located at the southwest corner of Arrow Route and Etiwanda Avenue; APNs: 0229-131-04, -17, and -25. Related files: Development Review DRC2013-00155, Tree Removal Permit DRC2013- 00315, and Uniform Sign Program DRC2013-00316. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00155 - • MIG/HOGLE-IRELAND FOR GOODMAN RANCHO SPE, LLC -A review of a proposal to construct two (2)industrial warehouse buildings of 555,664 square feet(Building 1/Phase 1) • HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA NOVEMBER 13, 2013 CM=ONcu Page 3 and 1,033,565 square feet(Building 2/Phase 2)on a property comprised of three(3)parcels with a combined area of 3,255,834 square feet (74.7 acres) which is currently developed with a concrete pipe manufacturing/storage facility(operated by Ameron International)in the Heavy Industrial (HI) District located at the southwest corner of Arrow Route and Etiwanda Avenue; APNs: 0229-131-04, -17, and -25. Related files: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19448, Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00315, and Uniform Sign Program DRC2013-00316. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. F. TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2013-00315 - MIG/HOGLE-IRELAND FOR GOODMAN RANCHO SPE, LLC- A request to remove trees in conjunction with a proposal to construct two (2) industrial warehouse buildings of 555,664 square feet (Building 1/Phase 1) and 1,033,565 square feet (Building 2/Phase 2) on a property comprised of three (3) parcels with a combined area of 3,255,834 square feet (74.7 acres) which is currently developed with a concrete pipe manufacturing/storage facility(operated by Ameron International)in the Heavy Industrial (HI) District located at the southwest corner of Arrow Route and Etiwanda • Avenue; APNs: 0229-131-04, -17, and -25. Related files: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19448, Development Review DRC2013-00155, and Uniform Sign Program DRC2013-00316. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. G. UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM DRC2013-00316 - MIG/HOGLE-IRELAND FOR GOODMAN RANCHO SPE, LLC- A request to establish a Uniform Sign Program in conjunction with a proposal to construct two(2)industrial warehouse buildings of 555,664 square feet(Building 1/Phase 1) and 1,033,565 square feet (Building 2/Phase 2) on a property comprised of three (3) parcels with a combined area of 3,255,834 square feet (74.7 acres) which is currently developed with a concrete pipe manufacturing/storage facility (operated by Ameron International)in the Heavy Industrial(HI) District located at the southwest corner of Arrow Route and Etiwanda Avenue; APNs: 0229-131-04, -17, and -25. Related files: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19448, Development Review DRC2013-00155, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00315. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. V. COMMISSION CONCERWHISTORIC PRESERVATION AND PLANNING COMMISSION VI. ADJOURNMENT • 1, Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby • certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on November 7, 2013, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak,given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others,the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After speaking, please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium. It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under"Public Comments." There is • opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda. Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. A copy of any such materials should also be provided to the Secretary to be used for the official public record. All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. Requests for scheduling agenda items will be at the discretion of the Commission and the Planning Director. AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., except for legal City holidays. APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of $2,486 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas, staff reports and minutes can be found at www.CityofRC.us • a Vicinity Map Historic Preservation and Planning Commission Meeting November 13 , 2013 o --• E a --�•—• 1 L � I L a p f y P I 4 U � c � � o 1 V19st 1 CL i Base Line /Bass Or' Church Church 1 FoothillN � Foothill Arrow o a Arrow J4 rsey L 8th Iao. I o I U� 6th w 6th W L € y Y B 4th < _ _ 4th * Meeting Location: © D, E, F, G City Hall/Council Chambers 10600 Civic Center Drive IA: Approval of Regular Meeting Minutes dated October 23, 2013 THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA THE MINUTES OF C�HO ONCA THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 23, 2013 - 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER Pledge of Allegiance 700 PM Roll Call Chairman Howdyshell X Vice Chairman Fletcher X Munoz X Wimberly A Oaxaca X Additional Staff Present., Candyce Burnett, Planning Manager, Jeff Bloom, Deputy City Manager/Economic and Community Development; Steven Flower, Assistant City Attorney,- Steve ttorney;Steve Fowler, Assistant Planner, Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer, Jennifer Nakamura, Associate Planner, Lois Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary, Mike Smith, Associate Planner, Dominick Perez, Planning Technician II. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Historic Preservation Commission or Planning Commission, not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. There were no communications from the public. • Item A-1 1� V HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Wm„o OCTOBER 23, 2013 Ctr" ONa" Page 2 III. CONSENT CALENDAR/HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION A. Approval of minutes dated October 9, 2013 B. VACATION OF A PORTION OF CENTER AVENUE AND 24th STREET, LOCATED AT 10312 24TH STREET, WEST OF HAVEN AVENUE AND SOUTH OF ARROW ROUTE (V-222) — JAZMIN BRISENO — A request to vacate a portion of Center Avenue and a portion of 24th Street, located at 10312 24th Street, west of Haven Avenue and south of Arrow Route -APN 209-122-01 Related File: DRC2012-00694 Moved by Munoz seconded by Oaxaca to adopt the Consent Calendar. Carried 4-al(Wmberfy absent) IV. DIRECTOR'S REPORTS/PLANNING COMMISSION C. WEST SIDE DISTRICTS AND STREET LIGHTING DISTRICTS . Lon Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services gave the PowerPoint Presentation (copy on file) and lead the discussion. In response to Commissioner Oaxaca, she clarified that currently there are several different types of districts, all within the same boundary. She said this series of actions would dissolve the old districts and 8 new districts would be formed that are independent of each other. In response to Vice Chairman Fletcher, she clarified that with the cut backs in services, the current yearly gap is 1.2 million but the real deficit would be 3 million per year if services were fully restored. She said as a general rule of thumb, the cost per household may be around $100 more per year. In response to Chairman Howdyshell, she said the City maintains the 9,000 lighting fixtures around town but they are owned by Edison, the taxpayer pays the bil for the maintenance. She noted that the approval actions would have to be supported by the community. V. PUBLIC HEARINGSIPLA.NNING COMMISSION The following Items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chairman will open the public hearing to receive testimony. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. Please sign In after speaking. D. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19433 - FOUNTAINHEAD DEVELOPMENT - A request to create two parcels from one existing parcel (APN 0227-151-38) located within an existing shopping center at the northwest corner of Rochester Avenue and Foothill Boulevard in the Community Commercial (CC) District of the Terra Vista Community • Item A-2 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES „o OCTOBER 23, 2013 NC CUCAMONGA Page 3 Plan on property located at 11884 Foothill Boulevard. Related Files: Design Review DRC2013-00458 and Conditional Use Permit Modification DRC2013-00459. This project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to state CEQA guidelines sections 15315 (Class 15 Exemption- Minor Land Divisions). E. DESIGN REVIEW DRC2013-00458 - FOUNTAINHEAD DEVELOPMENT - A request to develop a 4,994 square foot building within an existing shopping center at the northwest comer of Rochester Avenue and Foothill Boulevard in the Community Commercial (CC) District of the Terra Vista Community Plan on property located at 11884 Foothill Boulevard - APN: 0227-151-38. Related Files: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19433 and Conditional Use Permit Modification DRC2013-00459. This project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to state CEQA guidelines section 15332 (Class 32 Exemption - In-Fill Development Projects). F. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT MODIFICATION DRC2013-00459 - FOUNTAINHEAD DEVELOPMENT - A request to amend Conditional Use Permit CUP95-11 to modify an existing master plan to allow for the construction of a 4,994 square foot building within an existing shopping center at the northwest corner of Rochester Avenue and Foothill Boulevard in the Community Commercial (CC) District of the Terra Vista Community Plan on property located at 11884 Foothill Boulevard -APN: 0227-151-38. Related Files: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19433 and Design Review DRC2013-00458. This project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to state CEQA guidelines sections 15332 (Class 32 Exemption - In-Fill Development Projects). Dominick Perez, Planning Technician, gave the report and PowerPoint presentation (copy on file). He noted changes in the standard conditions with respect to acceptable noise levels. He said the corrections have been made in the resolutions drafted for signature. Steven Flower, Assistant City Attorney said the changes occur on pages D-F 36, 56, and 76 of the agenda packet. He read the noted change in conditions for the record and stated the exterior noise level of 60 is changed to 65 dB from 10pm to 7am and 65dB is now 70 dB 7am-10pm and the reference to Table 17.66.050-1 has been deleted. Kurt Kurtti of Fountainhead Development said they are excited and he offered thanks to Mr. Perez for his assistance and the DRC. He said they are comfortable with the conditions of approval. Chairman Howdyshell opened the public hearing and hearing no comment, closed the public hearing. • Item A-3 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RHO OCTOBER 23, 2013 C10A"'ONOA Page 4 Items D, E, F: Moved by Fletcher, seconded by Munoz carried 4-0-1 to adopt Resolutions 13-42, 13-43 & 13-44 with the incorporated corrections in the noise conditions. G. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2012-01202 - LENNAR HOMES OF CALIFORNIA: A review of 291 single-family homes that will be constructed in conjunction with a proposed subdivision of a parcel of about 3,047,614 square feet (79.67-acres) in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan (South Overlay), located about 525 feet east of Etiwanda Avenue at the north side of Arrow Route; APN: 0229-041-09. Related files: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18870 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00483. On July 10, 2013, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was adopted by the Planning Commission for Tentative Tract Map SUBT718870. Per Section 15162, no further environmental review is required for subsequent projects or minor revisions to projects within the scope of a previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. Mike Smith, Associate Planner presented the staff report and PowerPoint presentation. (copy on file). Ryan Combe of Lennar Homes offered thanks to Mr. Smith and the DRC for their diligent • help. In response to Vice Chairman Fletcher, he reported the size of the homes range from 1839 square feet to about 3400 square feet and it is a gated community. Chairman Howdyshell said she is impressed with the 13 footprints, and said the project proposal is quite attractive. Chairman Howdyshell opened the public hearing and hearing none, Chairman Howdyshell closed the public hearing. She noted the project is in good time as we need more housing stock. Vice Chairman Fletcher said it was a difficult property but the development offers a good product with lots of variety. Item G: Moved by Oaxaca, seconded by Fletcher, carried 4-0-1 (Wimberly absent) to adopt Resolution 13-45. H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19448 - MIG/HOGLE-IRELAND FOR GOODMAN RANCHO SPE, LLC - A review of a tentative parcel map in conjunction with a proposal to construct two (2) industrial warehouse buildings of 555,664 square feet (Building 1/Phase 1) and 1,033,565 square feet (Building 2/Phase 2) on a property comprised of three (3) parcels with a combined area of 3,255,834 square feet (74.7 acres) which is currently developed with a concrete pipe manufacturing/storage facility (operated by Ameron International) in the Heavy Industrial (HI) District located at the southwest corner of Arrow Route and Etiwanda Avenue; APNs: 0229-131-04, -17, and -25. Related files: Development Review DRC2013-00155, Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00315, and Uniform Sign Program DRC2013-00316. Item A-4 h HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANC „o OCTOBER 23, 2013 CUCAMONGA Page 5 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. I. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00155 - MIG/HOGLE-IRELAND FOR GOODMAN RANCHO SPE, LLC -A review of a proposal to construct two (2) industrial warehouse buildings of 555,664 square feet (Building 1/Phase 1) and 1,033,565 square feet (Building 2/Phase 2) on a property comprised of three (3) parcels with a combined area of 3,255,834 square feet (74.7 acres) which is currently developed with a concrete pipe manufacturing/storage facility (operated by Ameron International) in the Heavy Industrial (HI) District located at the southwest corner of Arrow Route and Etiwanda Avenue; APNs: 0229-131-04, -17, and -25. Related files: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19448, Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00315, and Uniform Sign Program DRC2013-00316. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. J. TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2013-00315 - MIG/HOGLE-IRELAND FOR GOODMAN RANCHO SPE, LLC - A request to remove trees in conjunction with a proposal to construct two (2) industrial warehouse buildings of 555,664 square feet (Building • 1/Phase 1) and 1,033,565 square feet (Building 2/Phase 2) on a property comprised of three (3) parcels with a combined area of 3,255,834 square feet (74.7 acres) which is currently developed with a concrete pipe manufacturing/storage facility (operated by Ameron International) in the Heavy Industrial (HI) District located at the southwest corner of Arrow Route and Etiwanda Avenue; APNs: 0229-131-04, -17, and -25. Related files: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19448, Development Review DRC2013-00155, and Uniform Sign Program DRC2013-00316. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. K. UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM DRC2013-00316 - MIG/HOGLE-IRELAND FOR GOODMAN RANCHO SPE, LLC - A request to establish a Uniform Sign Program in conjunction with a proposal to construct two (2) industrial warehouse buildings of 555,664 square feet (Building 1/Phase 1) and 1,033,565 square feet (Building 2/Phase 2) on a property comprised of three (3) parcels with a combined area of 3,255,834 square feet (74.7 acres) which is currently developed with a concrete pipe manufacturing/storage facility (operated by Ameron International) in the Heavy Industrial (HI) District located at the southwest comer of Arrow Route and Etiwanda Avenue; APNs: 0229-131-04, -17, and -25. Related files: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19448, Development Review DRC2013-00155, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00315. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. Items H, 1, J, K., These items are re-advertised to be heard at the November 13, 2013 meeting. No action was taken. Item A-5 i HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANc,O OCTOBER 23, 2013 CONGA Page 6 L. DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2013-OOSd7-873 AND ADDENDUM TO GENERAL PLAN FINAL PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (FPEIR) (SCH #2000061027) - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A supplement to Development Code Update (DRC2010-00571) amending Title 17 (Development Code) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to clarify definitions, administrative procedures and correct prior errors and omissions. An Addendum to the General Plan FPEIR has been prepared for this project. This item will be forwarded to the City Council for final action. Jennifer Nakamura, Associate Planner presented the report and PowerPoint presentation (copy on file). She noted an error in the case file number that has been corrected since the distribution of the original agenda. The correct case number is DRC2013-00873 as opposed to DRC2013-00817 as shown on the report and agenda. She said the correction will be carried through to the resolution and Official Record documents. She said there is a total of 14 amendments. Chairman Howdyshell opened the public hearing and seeing and hearing none, closed • the public hearing. Item L: Moved by Fletcher, seconded by Oaxaca to recommend approval by adoption of Resolution 13-50 and forward the proposed amendments and Addendum to the General Plan FPEIR to the City Council for final action. Carried 4-0-1 (Wimberty absent). M. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00530 - FH II - FRONTIER 12 - A request to construct 12 single family residences on 3.6 acres of land within the Low Residential (2-4 Dwelling Units per acre) in the Etiwanda North Specific Plan, located on the southwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Vintage Drive -APN: 0225-161-13. On March 13, 2013, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was adopted by the Planning Commission for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18709. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects or minor revisions to projects within the scope of a previous Negative Declaration. Shelly Jordan of Frontier Communities said this is their second tract in Rancho. Chairman Howdyshell opened the public hearing. Seeing and hearing no comment, she closed the public hearing. Item M: Moved by Munoz, seconded by Fletcher to adopt Resolution 13-51. Carried 4-0-1. Item A-6 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES WNc„o OCTOBER 23, 2013 CUCAMONGA Page 7 VI. COMMISSION CONCERNS/HISTORIC PRESERVATION AND PLANNING COMMISSION Commissioner Munoz gave kudos to staff for the great Healthy RC event. He noted the great participation and said it was very enjoyable. Chairman HowdysheU echoed the comment and noted how organized it was and how many members of the public attended. VII. ADJOURNMENT 8.'00 PM • Item A-7 STAFF REPORT PLaNNuvG DUARTMENvc Date: November 13, 2013 RANCHO To: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission C,,UCAMONGA From: Candyce Burnett, Planning Manager By: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner Subject: TIME EXTENSION DRC2013-00811- CCI LOT 9 HAVEN LLC C/O DREW WILLOCK - A request for a two-year time extension for a previously approved project (Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00464) to expand the Haven Village commercial center with two multi- tenant retail buildings with a drive-thru totaling 6,484 square feet on a 41,821 square foot site within the Neighborhood Commercial (NC) Development District, located at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and the SR-210 Freeway - APN: 0201-272-23. The Planning Commission determined that the project was categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 In-Fill Development Projects. Per Section 15162, no further environmental review is required as there are no changes to the project. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of a two-year Time Extension of Conditional Use • Permit DRC2013-00811 (original case number DRC2008-00464) by adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval with conditions. ANALYSIS: A. Background: On January 28, 2009, the Planning Commission approved Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00464 for the Development of a two-building, 6,464 square foot addition to the Haven Village commercial center. That approval was valid for 5 years from the January 28, 2008, Planning Commission hearing date, with an expiration date of January 28, 2014. Development Code Section 17.14.090(C) provides the applicant with the opportunity to apply for a 2-year time extension when the request is made not less than 30 days prior to the expiration date. The applicant submitted a time extension request to the City on September 18, 2013. All time extension requests are subject to the review and approval by the same approving authority as the original project, which in this case was the Planning Commission. The new expiration date will be January 28, 2016, with the approval of this 2-year time extension. The applicant is eligible for an additional 1-pyear time extension if permits are not approved by the new expiration date. B. Time Extension Request: The applicant has submitted a letter stating that because of the negative economic outlook for commercial development, they have postponed starting construction on the approved project. They estimate that they will begin construction 36 months from the current expiration date. Staff has informed the applicant that the proposed timeline will require the approval of a second time extension in the future. The letter also states that no changes are proposed to the approved project. C. Entitlement Discussion: The recent Development Code Update changed the type of approvals that • would be required for the applicant's project. At the time of the original application, only a Item B-1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TIME EXTENSION DRC2013-00811 - CCI LOT 9 HAVEN LLC November 13, 2013 Page 2 • Construction Conditional Use Permit was required for this applicant. With the new Development Code Update, a Development Review and Conditional Use Permit applications would be required for this type of development request. Because the project was approved prior to this change, the applicant is permitted to extend the expiration date of the existing Conditional Use Permit. No other changes were made to the Development Code that would affect the approved project. Staff, for this reason, finds it reasonable to approve the Time Extension request as presented. D. Design Review Committee: The project was reviewed by the Committee (Stewart, Munoz, Nicholson) on December 16, 2008. The Committee was supportive of the proposed commercial development. Staff raised a question regarding the proposed signs facing the freeway, and both Commissioners stated that they did not have an issue with these signs facing the freeway. Staff also questioned whether they would rather have the applicant use manufactured stone on the buildings and walls to match the existing center or real river rock; both Commissioners stated that they preferred real river rock. The Design Review Committee recommended that the project be forwarded to the Planning Commission as presented. E. Grading and Technical Review Committees: The project was reviewed by these Committees on December 16, 2008. The Committee's comments were integrated into the Resolution of Approval. F. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the Planning Commission determined that the original project was categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 (In-Fill Development • Projects) in connection with the City's approval of Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-000464 on January 28, 2009. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental environmental review is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project. No changes are proposed to the project; no substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicates new or more severe environmental impacts; and no new important information shows that the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered. There are no changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated when concluding the project was categorically exempt. Staff further finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not analyzed in the previous environmental review, and will not have more severe effects than previously analyzed. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. No correspondence has been received with respect to the Time Extension request. Respectfully submitted, Candyce rnett Planning anager CB:TV/ge • Item B-2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TIME EXTENSION DRC2013-00811 - CCI LOT 9 HAVEN LLC November 13, 2013 • Page 3 Attachments: Exhibit A - Time Extension Request Letter(prepared by the Applicant) Exhibit B - Staff Report dated January 28, 2009 for Development Review DRC2008- 00464 Exhibit C - Resolution of Approval No. 09-07 for Development Review DRC2008-00464 Draft Resolution of Approval for Time Extension DRC2013-00811 • • Item B-3 CCI LOT 9 HAVEN LLC • September 24, 2013 Mr. Tabe Van Der Zwaag City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: DRC 2013-00811 Time Extension for CUP Allowing Construction of Approximately 6,484 Square Feet of Retail Space approved under Planning Commission Resolution No. 09-07 Dear Mr. Van Der Zwaag: CCI Lot 9 Haven LLC ("CCP) owns a parcel of land ("Pareei") located in the Haven Village Shopping Center ("Shopping Center). On January 28, 2009, The City of Rancho Cucamonga ("City') approved DRC2008-00464 granting CCI a Conditional Use Permit ("CUP) to construct approximately 6,484 square feet of space and related site improvements on the Parcel pursuant to Planning Commission Resolution No. 09-07 ("Resolution'). At the time of the Resolution's adoption in early 2009, the retail • environment in the Inland Empire was anemic. As a result. CCI could not viably construct new retail space given the existence of a large amount of retail vacancy in the Shopping Center and other local centers and an overall lack of demand from quality tenants seeking high quality, new retail space. Due to these unfortunate circumstances, CCI opted not to proceed with the final construction drawings for construction of improvements under the Resolution and CUP. With recent improvement in the general economy and the retail environment in the Inland Empire area, CCI expects to commence final construction drawings for the Improvements and commencement of construction within 36 months following the current expiration of the CUP on January 27, 2014. As a result CCI is requesting an extension of CUP and entitlements approved under the Resolution for three years, until January 27, 2017. CCI is not requesting any changes to the project or entitlements approved to the Resolution other than an extension of time to proceed under the entitlements approved in the Resolution. 8480 E Orchard Road,Suite 4350,Greenwood Village,CO 80111 ;EXHIBIT A T 720 493 5100 F 720 493 3801 E www.cadencecepitalinvestmeats.com Item B-4 Please do not hesitate to call me with any questions or comments. • Sincerely, CCI LOT 9 HAVEN LLC �d T. Andrew Willock General Counsel • Item B-5 • STAFF REPORT PL41SIN VG3EPAMMIN1 Date: January 28, 2009HO UCAMONGA To: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission From: James R. Troyer,AICP, Planning Director By: Tabs van der Zweag,Associate Planner Subject: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2008-004134 - CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to construct two mull-tenant retail buildings with a drive-thru totaling 6,484 square feet on a 41,821 square foot site in the Neighborhood Commercial (NC) District, located at the northeast comer of Haven Avenue and the 210 Freeway - APN: 0201-272-23. Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from CEQA review and qualifies as a Class 32 exemption under State CEt7A Guidelines Section 15332. SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Site Characteristics: The 41,821 square foot site is located at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and the 210 Freeway, and generally slopes from north to south. The parcel was purchased from Caltrans and is now being incorporated into the existing Haven Village Commercial Center. The triangularly shaped site Is bordered by Haven Avenue to the west, the 210 Freeway to the south and the existing Haven Village commercial center to the north. • B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Existing Haven Viliaga Commercial Center-Neighborhood Commercial South - Existing Storage Facility (across the 210 Freeway) — Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) West - Existing Commercial (across Haven Avenue), (Office Professional) East - Existing Mull-Family Residences — Medum-High (14-24 dwelling units per acre) C. General Plan Designations Project Site - Neighborhood Commercial North - Neighborhood Commercial South - Low Residential (across the 210 Freeway, 2-4 dwelling units per acre) West - Office Professional East - Medium-High(14-24 dwelling units per ave) ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant proposes constructing two mufti-tenant retail buildings totaling 44,14 6,484 square feet, one of which will include a drive-thru lane. One building will be adjacent to Haven Avenue and the other will be adjacent to the 210 Freeway exit ramp. The architecture of the buildings is designed to compliment the existing buildings on the site and Includes the use of wood siding and a river rock wainscoting. The buildings most all applicable Development Code standards, including setbacks and building and wall heights. The two EXHIBIT B Item B-6 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2008.00484—CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES JANUARY 28, 2009 Page 2 buildings will be connected by a wood sided tower element, through which access will be provided to an outdoor seating area. The seating area will Include table and chairs, landscaping and a shade tree surrounded by a seat wall. Freeway noise in the seating area will be attenuated by a river rock wall topped with transparent sound panels. The existing parking spaces located adjacent to the south property line of the Haven Village retail center will be reoriented to provide two points of access and to increase the total number of parking spaces. There Is a shared parking and access agreement in place between the subject site and all the other parcels In the center. The applicant has submitted a preliminary sign program which proposes signs that are identical in color and size to the existing center, with halo Illumination being the only deviation from the approved sign program. S. Use Descrlotion: The Neighborhood Commercial District is Intended to provide the surrounding neighborhood with day-today convenience shopping and services. The existing center includes a variety of food stores, small restaurants and service businesses. The applicant proposes subdividing the two buildings into 8 tenant spaces, one of which will include a vehicle drive-thru. The applicant does not have a prospective tenant for the drive- thru suite and did not provide a parking study to determine the maximum vehicle capacity of the drive-thru. Staff has added a condition to the Draft Resolution of Approval requiring that use of the drive-thru will require the future tenant to submit a Conditional Use Permit and do a parking study. Staff believes, though that the design of the drive-thru is well-Integrated Into the overall layout of the parking lot end provides adequate stacking fora small fast food restaurant, pharmacy or similar business. No conflict in land uses is anticipated as the two proposed commercial buildings will be of a size and intensity that Is consistent with the existing commercial center. Additionally,the applicant hes agreed to modify the existing traffic signal at Haven Avenue andlta ALoma Drive with a dedicated signaled left tum lane to assist • traffic flow out of ft existing center, C. Parkino Calculatims: Haven Village will have a total of 808 parking spaces upon completion of the proposed project, 20 parking spaces over the minimum requirement The existing center currently has 589 parking spaces and the project area will Include an additional 39 parking spaces. The parking along the aouM property line of the existing center will be reoriented in order to provide two points of access Into the site. The Site Plan shows 3 parking spaces in the existing center which do not exist and have been subtracted from the overall parking court. Required parking in the existing center was calculated at 4.5 parking spaces for each 1,000 square feet of gross leasable floor area. Required parking for the proposed project was calculated at 1 parking space for each 200 square feet of gross leasable floor area.Taken as a whole(existing center and proposed project), the center will require 588 spaces. This takes Into consideration the additional parking required for food uses (restaurants, cafA, etc.) over 15 percent of the overall gross leasable area. Staff has determined that the center will have 20 excess parking spaces, which will permit an additional 2,000 square feet of leasable new restaurant space In the center as a whole. • Item B-7 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC200840464-CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES • JANUARY 28,2009 Page 3 P6. . Ales . .; GtruTea"se6le:Rloor'4isaa Gode�SYandeid " 'R aedA_ _ . _._ Existing Center 119,122 SF f 4.5 spaces/1.000 SF 537 spaces Proect Site 1 6484 1 s ace/200 SF 32 spaces Total Percents g!ift Restaurant Tenants 16.5% Paddng S eces R ulnad/cur Restaurants Over 15%of Total SF19 Total B Required 58a Total Parka provided 608 Excess Parkin S 20 Additional 3quare Feet of Restaurant Spam Permitted 2,000 D. Deslon Review Committee: The Project was reviewed by the Committee (Stewart, Munoz, and Nicholson) on December 16, 2008. The Committee was supportive of the proposed commercial development. Staff raised a question regarding the proposed signs facing the freeway and both Commissioners stated that they did not have an issue with these signs facing the freeway. Staff also questioned whether they would rather have the applicant use manufactured stone on the buildings and walls to match the existing center or real river rock;. both Commissioners stated that they preferred real river rock. The Design Review Committee recommended that the Project be forwarded to the Planning Commission as presented, E. Grad6 anti Technical Review s,.nmetees The project was reviewed by these committees on December 16. 2008. The Approval. Committees comments were Integrated into the Resolution of • F. Environmental Assessmen The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332, which covers In-fill development which meet the following criteria: 1) The project Is consistent with the General Plan and Development Code; 2) The project site Is less than 5 acres In size; 3)The project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species; 4) The project site will not result In any signifleard effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality or water quality; and 5)The site Is adequately served by all required uOlities and public services. The project entails developing two buildings totaling 6,484 square feet on site that is less than an acre in size. Staff finds that there Is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment in that proposed development is part of a much larger existing development and Will be fully integrated into that development The Planning Director has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemptlon, and based on Its own independent judgment,concurs with the staffs determination of exemption. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Del Bulletin newspaper. the Property was posted, and notices were mailed to all Property owners within a 660-fool radius of the project site. • Item B-8 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2008-00484-CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES JANUARY 28, 2009 • Page 4 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00464 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions. Respectfully submitted, R- 4-�-) J4nr R Troyer,AICP Plg Director JT-.TV/ds Attachments: Exhibit A Overall Site Plan of Haven Village Exhibit 8 -Detailed Site Plan Exhibit C - Floor Plans Exhibit D - Plaza Detail Exhibit E - Elevations Exhibit F - Grading Plans Exhibit G - Landscape Plan Exhibit H - Design Review Comments dated December 16, 2008 Draft Resolution of Approval for Development Review DRC2008-00484 • • Item B-9 W i \ • � �NV • p o iD • EXHIBIT A H Item B-10 MR x V Summary, �j `. ! _.. ....... .... .. i.a=ldo par* 5.45(1 fs..� 154% (D� j• .t 79 OW& w.a si.•sdb..e F.= bbsdi.d i]Sba dbd 3 I = 0, I ` - o� '. 30 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN - Scheme'& CAMCE – — – SEC HAVEN AVE. AND LEMON ST. AL. LLC 8460 E. ORCHARD RD. STE. 6900 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. DR[ENw00D VILLAGE, CO. 60111 00� t 1,,lI SF I . ryl M rD3 W EFUI EFruL EEW CORN t 1,191 SF 3 991 SF 2 MI SF s 1pM SF SCALE - T-111P MAIOWA WEl EE EQLWKD WRN AN AUTOAIATC FIEF"411M MUM IN ACCORDANCE WUHNIM 13 •—_�— ___` AND A l61®CIRMAL STATION M ALARA SVSMKTO A10N1102 THE SPMM SVU" PREUMINARY FLOOR PLAN CAOENCE CAPITAL, LLC ettf� HAVEN AND LEMON B4W E. ORCHARD R0. STE. 6900 MHCHO CUCAMONW,CALIFORNIA GREENWOOD VILLAGE, CO. 50111 ---- oho / 31' :3 (:S TRASH REGEPT v PATIO TAD Arm ASH u�R I- C= / C- -- C= R- ITH IT AN1E C= 5 ;T P 3cmb V«1• rD 3 LIG:' }' PLAZA PATTERAW NTH l.OLO!RW ��. .. GoI:GVETE u u U U U U U J �Nn PLAZA DETAIL - Schsme '8' SEC HAVEN AVE. AND LEMON ST, 11480 E..°Oacw�ft sT 6900 Rik Nfalf l RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CA- OKENWOOD VILLAGE. CO. 80111 IEllll TT TT r--w ��' i -Z!E� 191 AjjXAG§kLfj6lUjfG' 14ORTH ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION 'D rFTYTTTTFYFTFTTTITJP��F�� 1 3 EAST ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION MATERIALS AND FINISHES TO MATCH EYJSTING C04M ' VIOM SlW* a wom InysimmmC110 C310 2 - SAM MON 9 Gae%45CRM 3 VK=TwI I n 4 SHWa ROOF mn 3 UAL ffm am VENM(NW&W"AMAW SX*lq 6 ALWA&W SIONFRONT 7 rREC"UM TOWER ELEVATION MUMINARY ELEVATIONS CADENCE CAPHAL. LLC NROR 8480 E. CROWW FA SlE. 69M HAVEN & LEMON Rik L414CHO CLICAMONCTA,CALIFORNIA GREENWOOD VILLArE. CO. 80111 r "t 0 1 7J , li o 21 I, �1 � '. I 1 IIIIIIIL v v�p�0arti i.�o+.. pp rn� /� -_ - - - - - - - - - --� E 77 a7it IL , 0 y e Rh•� M < .. 3 _ ! I I I�tiJ�l 30 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN - Scheme 'Ll __ C ea. CADENCE CAPITAL. LLC AVaqua•;n!•�ayn.nu.; SEC HEN AVE. AND LEMON $T. 8480 E. ORCHARD RD. 51E. 6900 RANCHO GUCAMONGA,CA. GREENWOOD VILLAGE. CO. 80111 • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:20 p.m. Tabe van der Zwagg December 16, 2008 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2008-00464 - CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to construct two multi-tenant retail buildings with a drive-thru totaling 6,484 square feet on a 41,821 square foot site in the Neighborhood Commercial (NC) District, located at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and the 1-210 Freeway -APN: 0201-272-23. Site Characteristics: The site is located at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and the 1-210 Freeway and generally slopes from north-to-south. The parcel was purchased from Caltrans and is now being incorporated into the existing Haven Village commercial center. The triangularly shape site is bordered by Haven Avenue to the west, the 1-210 Freeway to the south and the existing center to the north. Project Overview: The applicant proposes the construction of two multi-tenant retail buildings totaling 41,821 square feet, one of which will include a drive-thru lane. One building will be adjacent to Haven Avenue and the other will be adjacent to the 1-210 Freeway exit ramp. The architecture of the buildings is designed to compliment the existing buildings on the site including the use of wood siding and a river rock wainscoting. The two buildings will be connected by a wood-sided tower element, through which access will be provided to an outdoor seating area. The seating area will include table and chairs, landscaping, and a shade tree surrounded by a seat wall. Freeway noise in the seating area will be attenuated by a river rock wall topped with transparent sound panels. The existing parking . spaces located adjacent to the south property line of the Haven Village retail center will be re-oriented to provide two points of access and to increase the total number of parking spaces. There is a shared parking and access agreement in place between the subject site and all the other parcels in the center. The applicant has submitted a preliminary sign program which proposes signs that are identical in color and size to the existing center, with halo illumination being the only deviation from the approved sign program. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Major Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project. 1. There are no Major Issues. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues. 1. Staff feels that the design and layout of the proposed project will be well-integrated into the overall design of the existing center. The applicant proposes wall signs facing the freeway on the rear elevation of the building adjacent to the freeway exit ramp. The general policy has been for signs to not face the freeway. The carwash on the entrance ramp across Haven Avenue (west), though, has signs facing the freeway entrance, while the self storage facility on the south side of the freeway was not permitted to have freeway signs. 2. The concrete in the plaza area should be colored concrete, and the rafters at the trellis feature �Qq should have decorative tails. EXHIBIT H Item B-17 DRC ACTION AGENDA SUBTT18710 AND DRC2008-00306—LEWIS OPERATING CORP. December 16, 2008 Page 2 • Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion. 1. All light fixtures shall have glare shields in order to confine the area of illumination within the project site. 2. All signs shall meet the City's Sign Ordinance requirements. 3. Where river rock is used, it shall be real or native fieldstone. Manufactured river rock is not permitted. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Design Review Committee provide direction and input regarding wall signs facing the freeway on the rear elevation of the building adjacent to the freeway exit ramp. Staff also recommends that the project be forwarded to the Planning Commission for final review. Desian Review Committee Action: Members Present: Munoz, Stewart, Nicholson Staff Planner. Tabe van der Zwagg Commissioners Stewart and Munoz were supportive of the proposed commercial development. Staff • raised a question regarding signs facing the freeway and both Commissioners stated that they did not have an issue with the proposed signs facing the freeway. Staff also questioned whether they would rather have the applicant use manufactured stone on the buildings and walls to match the existing center or real river rock and both Commissions stated that they preferred real river rock. The Design Review Committee recommended that the project be forwarded to the Planning Commission as presented. • Item B-18 RESOLUTION NO, 09-07 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2008-00464, FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF TWO MULTI-TENANT RETAIL BUILDINGS WITH A DRIVE-THRU TOTALING 6,484 SQUARE FEET ON AN EXISTING 41,821 SQUARE FOOT SITE IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL (NC) DISTRICT, LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF HAVEN AVENUE AND THE 210 FREEWAY;AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF-APN: 0201-272-23. A. Recitals. 1. Charles Joseph Associates filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00464,as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution,the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as the application.' 2. On the 28th day of January 2009, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW,THEREFORE,It Is hereby found,determined,and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamongs as follows: • 1. This Commission hereby specificalfy finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,Part A. of this Resolution are true and correct 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on January 28,2009,including written and oral staff reports,together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The 41,821 square foot site is located at the northeast comer of Haven Avenue and the 210 Freeway and generally stapes from north to south. The parcel was purchased from Caltrans and is now being incorporated into the existing Haven Village commercial center.The triangularly shaped site is bordered by Haven Avenue to the west,the 210 Freeway to the south and the existing Haven Village commercial center to the north;and b. The applicant proposes constructing two multi-tenant retail buildings totaling 8,484 square feet, one of which will include a drive-thru lane. One building wig be adjacent to Haven Avenue and the other will be adjacent to the 210 Freeway exit ramp;and C. The architecture of the buildings is designed to compliment the existing buildings on the site and includes the use of wood siding and a river rock wainscoting. The buildings meet all applicable Development Code standards including setbacks and building and wall heights. The two buildings will be connected by a wood sided tower element,through which access will be provided to an outdoor seating area;and d. With the development of the subject site,the required parking will be 588 stalls. With completion of the two buildings,the project site will have 608 stalls,thereby having 20 surplus parking spaces in the Haven Village Commercial Center, thereby exceeding the minimum requirement;and SEXHIBIT C Item R-1q PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 09-07 DRC2008-00464—CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES January 28, 2009 Page 2 • e. There is a shared parking and access agreement in place between the subject site and all the other parcels in the center, thereby ensuring adequate parking distribution for all uses. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above,this Commission hereby finds and concludes as fallows: a. The proposed use Is In accord with the General Plan, the objectives of Ute Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. b. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health,safety,or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. C. The proposed use complies with each of Ute applicable provisions of fife Development Code. 4. The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from Me requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332, which covers In-fill development which meal the following criteria:1)The project is consistent with the General Plan and Development Code;2)The project site is less than 5 acres In size;3)The project site has no value as habitat for endangered,rare or threatened species;4)The development of the project will not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality or water quality;and 5)The site Is adequately served by all required utilities and public services. The project entails developing two buildings totaling 8,484 square feet on a site that is less than an acre in size. Staff finds that there is no • substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on fits environment in that the proposed development is part of a much larger existing development and will be fully Integrated Into that development. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own Independent judgment, concurs in the staffs determination of exemption. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1,2,3,and 4 above,this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and Incorporated herein by this reference. 1) The trash enclosure shall be built per the Planning Department's standard drawing for commercial developments and use materials and finishes that are compatible with the proposed buildings. 2) Plans submitted for plan check will indicate 4-foot high dear sound reduction panels at the top of the river rock walls surrounding the outdoor eating area. 3) The outdoor eating area was designed for use by the tenants and customers of the Haven Village commercial center. Any change will require verification that there Is adequate available parking and approval by the Planning Director. • Item B-20 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 09-07 ORC2008-00464-CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES January 28, 2009 • Page 3 4) Where rock cobble Is used,it shall be real River rock. Manufactured River rock Is not permitted. 5) A total of 39 parking stalls shall be constructed on the proposed site,for a total of 608 stalls at the Haven Village Commercial Center. 6) The use of the drive-duu sults(s)by future tenants shall require the filing and approval of a Conditional Use Permit and the submission of a traffic study to verify adequate vehlde stacking. 7) The Landscape Pian submitted for plan check shall be updated to show the two missing parldng lot trees for which planter wells aro shown. Enaineerino Department 1) Modify the traffic signal at Haven Avenue and Alta Loma Drive to provide (1)left tum and(1)left/through shared lanes for westbound traffic(prior to building permit Issuance): a) Signal phasing In the eastbound and westbound directions shall be SPOL b) Modify signing and striping as required. 2) Install'Keep ClearO pavement markings and'Do Not Block IntersecOW • signs at die first on-site'intersection. 3) Plan check fees for above revision required. 4) Development Impact Fees due at Building Permit Issuance (Subject to Change/Periodic Increases): a) Transportation Fees: $41,856 b) Construction and Demolition: $5,000 deposit c) Construction and Demolition: $500 fee Buildina Department(Grading) 1) The applicant shag provide a copy of EPA Form 7520.16 (Inventory of Injection Wells)with the Facility ID Number assigned prior to issuance of the grading permIL 2) An HCOC exists for the downstream receiving water. The downstream receiving water (Mill Creek, Prado Area) is experiencing significant degradation of It banks. The project must Implement a volume-based treatment control BMP(retention/detention facility)on each lot. WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN 1) The submitted Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) dated August 6,2008, prepared by EKN Engineering, Inc. is substantially • Item B-21 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 09-07 DRC2008-00464-CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES January 28, 2009 Page 4 • complete.Include the Best Management Practices(BMPs)identified in the W OMP on the grading plan submitted for plan check.The following items need to be completed: Section Pa Correction Item Project Site A-3 Provide SIC Codes:httQ#wWw.osha.aov/Dlsrmis/siC manual.html.SIC Information code 5990 is not a valid code. Section 1.2 A-0 Provide it numbers t Tractor Parcel Ma DRC# and PMT# . Section 2.2 A-1 The table should read as follows: 1.A-'No' 1.B-'Yes' Section 2.2 A-1 An HCOC exists for the downstream receiving water. The downstream receiving water (Mill Creek, Prado Area) is experiencing significant degradation of Its banks. The project must implement a volume-based treatment control BMP retention/datention fadi on each lot Section 3.4 A-16 Section 3.4 must match Section 3.3. Please revise this section accordingly.Water Quality Inlets are used In Section 3.3 and must be noted In Section 3.4. Section 3.4.2 A-16 Provide BMP design calculations per the revised June 9. 2006 template.Show Bre volume based BMP on the conceptual grading and drainage plan to the size noted In the Attachment D volume calculations. Section 6 A-19 Notarize and record the City of Rancho Cucamonga's'Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan'. Copies are available at the Building and Safety front counter. R is recommended • that a draft copy Is sent to Matthew Addington in Building and Safety for review prior to recordirM the document Plan Review Locate the proposed BMP's on the conceptual grading and drainage 2) The Water Quality Management Plan should be completed,approved and recorded prior to Planning Commission approval,and must be completed, approved and recorded prior to Issuance of a grading permit 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF JANUARY 2009. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Richard B. Fletcher,Chairman ATTEST: J, Jam . Troyer,AICP, to • Item B-22 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.09-07 ORC2008-00404—CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES • January 28,2009 Page 5 I,James R.Troyer,AICP,Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duty and regularly Introduced,passed,and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of January 2008, by the following vote-to-wit AYES: COMMISSIONERS: PLETCHER, HOWDYSHELL, MUNOZ, STEWART NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NOHS ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: WIMBERLY • • Item B-23 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT f, DRC2008-00464 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICANT: CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES LOCATION: NEC HAVEN AVENUE-210 FREEWAY ALL OP THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General Requirements • 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sob expense any action broughl against the City.Its _l—l— agents, xRcers.or employees,geealrse of the Issuance of such approval.or in the alternative.to relnqubh such approval. The applicant shat reknbume the City, its agents, oftkers, or employees, for any Court costs and affomeys fees which the City. its agents. oRkem. or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may,at lts sole dlacretlon,participate at its own expense In the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relive applicant of his obligatbna under this condition. 2. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sob expense any action brought against ft City.its Jam_ agents.officers.or employees,because of the issuance of such approval,or In the alternative,to relinquish such approval. The applicant shag reimburse the Ciy, Its agents. offloars, or employees, for any Court costs and attorneys fees which the City, Its agents. officers. or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The Cly may.at Its sole discretion,participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shag ncil relieve applicant of his obligations under this eordgion. 3. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. 09-07, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shag be included on the plans(full size). The sheets)are for information only to all parties involved in the cot tnrction/tpadng activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed EngkteerlArchlted. 4. The applicant shell be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below. The project planner will confirm which fees appy to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Director hearing: a) Notice of Exemption-$50 X SC-12-0e t • 1'.V"NNINrW1NALWLNGC0MMt2009 Reii A StlFWDRC2009-0"WtdC0nd.d0G Item R-74 Project No.ORC200600sa4 canaftow WN B. Time Limits • 1. Conditions! Use Permit Review approval shall expire if building permits are not Issued or approved use has riot commenced within S years from tie date of approval. No extensions are allowed. C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plana which Include site plans.architectural elevations,exterior materials and colors,landscaping,sign program,and grading on file In the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon,at Conditions /_/ of Approval shall be completed to the calefaction of the Planning Director. 3. Occupancy of One facilities shag not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations neve been compiled with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be Inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4. Revised eta plans and building elevations Incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submttad for Planning Director review and approval prior to the Issuance of building permits. S. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be owdireted for 1_! consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building,etc.)or prior to find map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision,or approved use has commenced,whichever comes flrst. 8. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with Al sections of the Development Code,all otter applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Cor munity or Specific Plans In affect at tie • time of buildtg permit Issuance. T. A detailed on-site lighting plan,Including a photometric diagram,shal be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of building permits. Such plan shag Indicate style,illumination,location,height,and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 8. Trash receptacle(*)aro required and shall meet City standards. The final design,locations,and the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the Issuance of building permits, 9. AN ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers.AC condensers,etc..shat be located out of pudic view and adequately screened through the use of a combo oton of concrete or masonry wells,bermng,and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single-family residential developments,transformers shag be placed In underground vaults. 10. AN building numbers and Individual units shag be kle nti ied in a dear and concise manner, including proper illumination. 11. AN parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property I_J_ owner,homeowner'association.or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this fandscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of building permits. 12. Whom rock cobble is used,t shill be real river rock. Other stone veneers may be manufactured products. 2 IMIL JNINGnFINALIPLNGCOMM12009 Res a StfRpM RC200600sa`St$Cdnd.doe • Item R—JS PrOW No.DRC200"0464 comaftflon D. Shopping Canters —/--/-- • 1. Provide for the following design features in each trash enclosure, to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. a. Architecturally Integrated Into the design of(the shopping center/the project). b. Separate pedestrian access that does not require the opening of the main doors and to Include self-dosing pedestrian doors. a Largs enough to accommodate two trash bins. d. Rot-up doors. /— e. Trash Dina with counterweighted lids. f. Architecturally treated overhead shade Deilie. g. Chain link screen on top to prevent trash from blowing out of the enclosure and designed to be hidden from view. 2. Graffiit shat be removed within 72 hours. _J^/ 3. The entire site shat be kept free from trash and debris at all times and in no event shall bash and debris remain for mora than 24 hours. 4. Signs shall be conveniently posted for*no overnight parking'and for*employes parking only.' 5. All operations and businesses shall be conducted to comply with the following standards which shat be Incorporated into the lease agreements for at tenants: a. Noise Level-All commercial activities shat not create any noise that would exceed an • exterior noise level of 00 dS during the hours of 10 p.m.until 7 am.and 65 dB during the hours of 7 a.m.until 10 p.m. b. Loading and Unloading-No person dud cam to ktadkS unloading.ole %closing.or _I other handling of boxes, crates.containers, building materials, garbage cans, or other similar objects between the hours of 10 p.m.and 7 a.m.unless otherwise speeded herein. In a menner which would cause a notes disturbance to a residential ares. S. Textured pavement shall be provided across circulation aisle.pedestrian walkway,and plaza. —/—/— They shat be of brickltile pavers,exposed aggregate,integral calor concrete.or any combination thereof. Full samples shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 7. The lighting fbdurs design shall compliment the architecDual program. It shall include the plaza amlightinglighting fixtures.building lighting fixtures(exterior),and parking lot lighting fixtures. B. The design of store fronts shall compliment the architectural program and shall have subtle _/_/ variations subject to Design Review Committee approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 9. All future project within the shopping center shall be designed to be compatible and consistent with the architectural program established. 10. Any outdoor vending machines shall be recessed Into the budding faces and shall not extend irhto the pedestrian walkways. The design details shat be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director prior to the issuance of building permits. 3 • INPIANNINGTINALIPLNGGOMMh2M Res 6 SMRWIDRC200600464SWCond.doC Item B-26 vroioa No.ORC2009-MV14 Comdarbn onto B. Building Design —�—� 1. For commercial and Industrial projects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main JJ_ • building colors. F. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) J--� 1. M parking spaces shall be g feet wide by 18 fee long. When aside of any parking space abuts JJ._ a building.well, support column,or other obstruction,the space shat be a minimum of 11 feet wide. 2. AB parking lot landscape islands shag have a minimum outside dimension of 8 feet and shall JJ_ contain a 12-inch walk adiacent to the parking stall(including curb). 3. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation alsles shall be provkled JJ_ throughout the development to connect dwellings//units/buildings with open spaces/plan recreational uses. 4. AN parking spaces shag be double striped per city standards and all driveway alai",entrances, JJ_ and exits shall be striped per City standards. S. Handicap accessible stags shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more parking stele. Designate two percent or ore$tat whichever is greater,of the total number of stalls for use by the handcapped. S. Motorcycle parking area shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more J_J parking stele.Developments with over 100 parking stags shall provide motorcycle parking at the rate of one percent The area for motorcycle parking shall be a minimum of lib square feet. G. Landscaping JJ- 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan,including slope planting and model home landscaping In J_J • the cane of residential developmeM, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. 2. A minimum of 20%of tress planted within Industrie projects, and a minimum of 30%within commercial and office projects,shag be specimen Am tracts-24-Inch box or larger. 3. Within parking kms,trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking JJ— Oells. 4. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view ediacent to and along strictures at a rate of ona tree J/J_ per 30 Kneen feel of building. S. All private slopes of 5 lee or more In venial height and of 5:1 or greater slope,but Ione than 2:1 slope,shall be,at minimum,Irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be Installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 6. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet,but legs than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater cope shalt be landscaped and Irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq.ft.of slope arae.t-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq.ft.of slope area,and appropriate ground cover. In addition,slope hanks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater elope shag also Include one S-gallan or larger size tree per each 250 sq. h, of slope area Trees and shrubs shag be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shag include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 4 I:T~1Na%FINAl1P GCOM#"M R"6 Apo • Item B-27 Pmjecl No.DAC200840404 rArryWim Date 7. The final design of the perimeter parkways.walls,landscaping,and skfewaks shelf be included in JJ_-. • the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Plannh g Director review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Department 8. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be Installed within the public right-of-way on the JJ_ perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintatrned by the developer. 9. All web shell be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas,the JJ_ design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Department. 10. Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for Planning Director review and _I—J_ approval prior to issuance of building permits.These criteria shall encourage the natural growth characteristics of the selected tree species. H. Signs —J—J- 1. J1. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval —/J- Any signs proposed for this development shah comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by dw Planning Department prior to Installation of any signs. 2. A Uniform Sign Program for this development shall be submitted for Planning Director review and —/J— approval prior to issuance of building permits. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT,(909)477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REOYIREMDfTs AND NECESMATE ADDmONAL REVIEWS) JJ_ 1. General Reguilrements • 1. Submit five complete sets Of plans including the following: JJ� a. Site/Plot Aslan; b. Foundation Plan; C. Floor Plan; d. Ceiling and Root Framing Plan; e. Electrical Plans(2 sets,detached)including the size at the main switch,number and size of service entrance conductors.panel schedules.and single line diagrams; L Plumbing and Sewer Plans,including isometrics,underground diagrams,water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture unite,gas pipkhg, and heating and air conditioning;and g. Planning Department Project Number (i.e.. DRC2008-00484) clearly identified on the outside of all plans. 2. Submit two aete of structural calculations,energy conservation calculations,and a soils report. JJ— Architact's/Engkheers stamp and'wet'signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers'Compensation coverage to _/_/_ the City prior to pertain issuance. 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. JJ_ S • lAPLANNINOhFINAUPLN0C0MWQ0W RM a$T1R9WRC20MW46461AC0nd.d0c Item B-28 Proluct No.DRC2M-0040a complown an 5. Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the -_J-_J_ Building and Safety Department. • J. Site Development 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. Ali plans shall be JJ_ marked with it*project file number(I.e.,DRC2008-00464). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes,and all other applicable codes,ordinances,and regulations In affect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Department for availability of tits Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development project or JJ_ major addition,the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee,Park Fee, Drainage Fee,Transportation Development Fee,Parnit and Plan Check Fees,ConsWction and Demolition Ddveralon Program deposit and fees and School Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school lase receipt to the Building and Safety Department prior to permits Issuance. 3. Street addressee shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tract1parcel map --J--I— recordation and prior to Issuance of bulkfing permits. 4. Construction activity shalt not occur between the hours of 13:00 p.m. and 6:30 am. Monday —J—J— through Saturday,with no construction on Sunday or ho0days. 5. Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard(avellabie at the Planning Departme irs public JJ— countar). K New Strubttuea JJ- 1. Provide compliance with the California Budding Code (CBC) for property line clearances JJ— considering use,area,and fire-realadveness. 2. Play Me compliance with the California Budding Code for required occupancy separations. JJ— • 3. Provide draft stops In attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square fast, in accordance with CBC J�J Section 1505. 4. Exterior wells shall be constructed of the required fire rating in aocordance with CBC Table 5•A --J—J— S. —J5. Openings in exterior walls shall be protected In accordance with CBC Table 5•A. J� & Upon tenant Improvement plan check submitted,additional requirements may be needed. J� L Geading 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with California Building Code,City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be In subetentlal conformance with the approved grading per• 2. A soils report shat be prepared by qualified Engineer Licensed by the State of California to JJ— perform such work Two copies will be provided at plat submittal for review. Plans shell Implement design recommendations per said report. 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 4. The final Grading and Drainage Plan appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be JJ— completed,submitted,and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 8 IADUNNIN6hFINAL\PLNGC10WMk 00a Rc4 a S1fipMRC20080 WMCoWAoo • Item R_7Q PMIW No.DRC2QW-W404 Candatlon Date S. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal Is required for all new construction • projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will gerwrate 50 cubic stamped and wet signed try CalNomrds or more of combined cut and fllThe Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, registered Civil Engineer. 8. Comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures. 7. Rough Grading and Drainage Plans/Permits are separate from Precise Grading and Drainage JJ_ Plans/Permite. 8. A drainage study showing a 100-year,AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building Official for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage.All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. 9. Acquire off-site drainage easements. JJ- 10. Acquire off-site drainage acceptance letter from acQacent downstream property owner or discharge flows In a natural condition(concentrated lbws are not accepted)b provide a drairfage a"showing the proposed flows do not exceed the exissmg nows. 11. Obtain written permission to construct wag on property line or provide a detall(s)showing the wall JJ— offset from the property line. 12. Implement City Standards for on-site construction where possible,provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 13. All slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the pudic right of way. JJ- 14. Private sewer, water and storm drain improvements wig be designed per the, latest adopted J-1— Canforria Plumb"Code. 15. Roof storm water Is riot permitted to flow over the pudic parkway. JJ_ • 1& Show existing topography I00•feet beyond project boundary. 17. Provide a grading agreement for cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards. . J J- 18. The precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided In the City of Rancho JJ_ Cucamonga handout'IMormation for Grading Pians and Perrmir. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: M. Sttwt Improvements 1. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street Improvement plans,including street trees.and traffic signal plans shall be revised by JJ_ a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City rgineer and se City Attorney guaranteeing Completion of the public street improvements,prior to to Issuance of building perms. b. Prior to any word being performed in public right-of-way, fees shelf be paid and a JJ._ construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineers Office In addition to any otter permits required. (Prior to buik/rtg permd occupancy). o. Pavement striping,marking,traffic signing,street name signing.traffic signal conduit,and JJ— interconnect conduit shall be Installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 7 • IAPLA11NI116\ANAi.\PLNDC0rd"(X)9 Rp a SII1'pM1P1C200"404SMC0r1A.d0e Itam R-30 Project No.ORC2004•OGI64 completion Dela 2. Install street from par City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed _JJ legend (box below) and construction Was shall appear on the title page of the street • improvement plans. Street improvement plane shelf include a line item within the construction legend stating: 'Street tree*shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheat—(typically ghost 1).' Where public landscape plans are required,tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. The City Engineer reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables. For additional Information,contact the Project Engineer. Mln Grow *deet NNW Botanical Maurine Cammml Nemo apace spow"O $be Oly. Hawn Ave Maproae Grew" NCH 8.100 8C O.C. is Flo Forearornd P.A B or 'Melestic Beady ssaepr+o, Gal. In Greeter.Generally In spaced hard Of Sk*W&k this far art PA Lou Then g' Mecnoas Onaxasore NON 3' 20'O.C. 16 Fill '9L May Gal. In Preryry Tree M Wlon&@ov# Popueulls ue BoTree 8' W O.C. 16 FIII Meows M" Gal. in wgr Benkd sfde g2Q1tnx.&Notes for Street Trow 1) All street tress are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) All'street trees are subject to Inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Department. 3) Any private landscape plans that show street trees: 'All improvements within the public rightohway,Including street trees,shall be installed per the public improvement piens.' t then is a discrepancy bstweert the public and private plena,the street improvement plans will govern. N. Public Maintenance Areas • 1, A signed consent and waiver forth to join andla form Bis appropriate Landscape and Lighting _J—J— Distdeta*half be filed with the City Engineer prior to issuance of building perrnk. O. Mainage and Flood Control 1. Storm drain lateral must be constructed under an Engineering Const lon Permit prior to —i�— building occupancy. P. Utilities JJ 1. The developer shall be responelbie for the relocation of existing utlIM"as necessary. J� O. General Requirements and Approvals 1. Prior to the Issuance of bulking permits,a Diversion Deposit and relaxed administrative fees shat be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable 4 at least 50% of all wastes generated during constnucdon and demolition aro diverted from landfills,and appropriate documentation Is provided to the City. Font CD-1 shat be submitted to the Engineering Department when the first building permit application is submitted to Bulldimg and Safety. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department within 00 days following the completion of the constniefion andlor demolition project e 1APaANNING4FINALIPLNGCOMW,M Res 8 SdRpWRC200600161SWCond.dm • Itpm R-31 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Fire Construction Services STANDARD CONDITIONS Haven and Lemon Build-out (2) Retail/Food Service Buildings SEC Haven& 210 FWY(S/O Lemon) DRC2008-00484 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT The RCFPD Procedures & Standards which are referenced In this document can be access on the web at under the Fire Safety Division & Fire Construction Services section. Search by article; the preceding number of the standard refers to the article. Chose the appropriate article number then a drop down menu will appear, select the corresponding standard. FSG-11 Public and Private Water supply 1. Design guidelines for Flre Hydrants: The following provides design guidelines for • the spacing and location of fire hydrants: a The maximum distance between fire hydrants in commercial/industrial projects is 300-feet. No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 150-feet from an approved fire hydrant. For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 100-feet. b. The preferred locations for fire hydrants are: 1. At the entrance(s) to a commercial, industrial or residential project from the public roadways. 2. At intersections. 3. On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible. 4. As required by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs of the Fire District. 5. A minimum of forty-feet (4(Y) from any building. c. If any portion of a facility or building is located more than 150-feet from a public fire hydrant measured on an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, additional private or public fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided. d. Provide one fire hydrant for each 1000 gpm of required fire flow or fraction thereof. FSC-2 Fire Flow 1. The required fire flow for this project is 1750 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square Inch. This requirement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances. Item B-32 2. The required minimum fire flow for this project, when automatic fire sprinklers are Installed Is 1500 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds • per square inch. This flow reflects a 50-percent reduction for the installation of an approved automatic fire sprinkler system in accordance with NFPA 13 with central station monitoring. This requirement Is made In accordance with the California Fire Code Appendix, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances. 3. Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed project may be used to provide the required fire flow subject to Fire District review and approval. Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow. 4. Fre protection water plans are required for all projects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site. Building permits will not be Issued until fire protection water plans aro approved 5. On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed project site. FSC-3 Prerequlsite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkier Systems 1. Prior to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire sprinkler system, the appilcant shall submit plans, specifications and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground supply piping. Approval of the underground supply piping system must be obtained prior to submitting the overhead fire sprinkler system plans. FSC-4 Requlrsments for Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Automatic fire sprinklers shall be Installed In build" as required by the2007 Calffomia Fire Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance FD46 and/or any other applicable standards require an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to • be installed. FSC-6 Fire Alarm System 3 Sprinkler Monitoring 1. The 2007 California Building Code, the RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard, Ordinance FD46 and/or the 2007 California Fire Code require most fire sprinkler systems to be monitoring by Central Station sprinkler monitoring system. A manual and or automatic; fire alarm system fire may also be required based on the use and occupancy of the building. Plan check approval and a building permit are required prior to the installation of a fire alarm or a sprinkler monitoring system. Plans and specifications shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services in accordance with RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard. FSC-6 Fire District Site Access Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as p►Ivate roads, streets drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes. Please reference the RCFPD Fire Department Access Roadways Standard. I. Location of Access. All portions of the structures 161 story exterior wall shall be located within 150-feet of Fire District vehicle access, measure on an approved route around the exterior of the building. Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates and fences are deemed obstructions. 2. Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are: -2- • Item R-33 L The minimum unobstructed width Is 26-feet. • b. The maximum inside tum radius shall be 24-feet. c. The minimum outside tum radius shall be 50-feet. d. The minimum radius for cul-desacs is 45-feet. e. The minimum vertical clearance is 14-feet, 6-Inches. f. At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet on each side. g. The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9-degrees or 20 percent. h. The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12%. I. Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight(GVW). j. Trees and shrubs planted adjacent to the fire lane shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14-feet, 6-inches from the ground up. Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus. 3. Access Doorways: Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be provided as follows: a In buildings without high-piled storage, access shall be provided In accordance with the 2001 Califomia Building Code, Fire and/or any other applicable standards. b. In buildings with high-piled storage access doors shaft be provided in each 100 lineal feet or major fraction thereof, of the exterior wap that faces the required access roadways. When railways are Installed provisions shall be made to maintain Fire District access to all required openings. 4. Access Walkways: Hardscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to all required building exterior openings. 5. CommsrctaNndustrlal Gates: Any gate installed across a Fire Department access road shall be In accordance with Fire District Standard. The following . design requirements appy: a. Prior to the fabrication and Installation of the gates, plans are required to be submitted to Fre Construction Services (FCS) for approval. Upon the completion of the Installation and before placing the gates in service, inspection and final acceptance must be requested from FCS. b. Gates must slide open horizontally or swing inward. c. Gates may be motorized or manual. d. When fully open, the minimum clearance dimension of drive access shall be 20 feet. e. Manual gates must be equipped with a RCFPD lock available at the Fire Safety Office for$20.00. f. Motorized gates must open at the rate of one-foot per second. g The motorized gate actuation mechanism must be equipped with a manual override device and a fail-safe or battery backup feature to open the gate or release the locking Mechanism in rase of power failure or mechanical malfunction. h. Motorized gates shall be equipped with a Knox override key switch. The switch must be installed outside the gate in a visible and unobstructed location. I. For motorized gates, a traffic loop device must be Installed to allow exiting from the complex. j, If traffic pre emption devices (TPD) are to be Installed, the device, location and operation must be approved by the Fire Chief prior to Installation. Bi-directional or multiple sensors may be required due to complexity of the various entry configurations. $tom R—IA 7. Fire Lane Identification; Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes. A site plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District • standards shalt be Included In the architecture] plans submitted to B&S for approval. 8. Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly noted on the site plan. A copy of the approved Alternative Method application, if applicable, must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to B&S for plan review. 6. Roof Access: There shall be a means of fire department access from the exterior walls of the buildings on to the roofs of all commercial, industrial and mull-family residential structures with roofs less than 75' above the level of the fire access road. L This access must be reachable by either fire department ground ladders or by an aerial ladder. b. A minimum of one ladder point with a fixed ladder shall be provided in buildings with construction features, or high parapets that inhibit roof access. c. The number of ladder points may be required to be increased, depending on the building size and configuration. d. Regardless of the parapet height or construction features the approved ladder point shall be Identified In accordance to the roof access standard. e. Where the entire roof access is restricted by high parapet walls or other obstructions,a permanently mounted access ladder is required. C Multiple access ladders may be required for larger buildings. g. Ladder construction must be in accordance with the RCFPD Roof Access Standard Appendix A. h. A ale plan showing the locations of the roof ladder shall be submitted during plan check. I. Ladder points shall face a fire access roadway(s). FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits • Listed are those Fre Code permits commonly associated with the business operations arKVor building constriction. Plan check submittal Is required with the peri application for approval of the permit; field inspection is required prior to pert Issuance. General Use Permit shag be required for any activity or operation not specifically described below, which In the Judgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce Conditions that may be hazardous to Me or property. • Candles and open flames in public assemblies • Compressed Gases Public Assembly Dry Cleaning Plants Refrigeration Systems • Explosive or Blasting Agents Repair Garages Tents, Canopies and/or Air Supported Structures LPG or Gas Fuel Vehicles In Assembty Buildings FSC-12 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to Fire Construction Servkes Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction of buildings and/or the installation of equipment designed to store, use or dispense hazardous materials in accordance with the 2007 California Building, Flre, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical Codes, RCFPD Ordinances FD46and other Implemented and/or adopted standards. -4- • Item B-35 FSC-13 Altemate Method Application . Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will review all requests for ahemate method, when submitted. The request must be submitted on the Fre District "Application for Alternate Method' form along with supporting documents and payment of the $92 review fee. FCS-15 Annexation of the parcel map: Annexation of the parcel map Into the Community Facilities District #85-1 or #88.1 is required prior to the Issuance of grading or building permits. Chronolosalcal Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS — Please complete the following prior to the Issuance of any building permits: 1. Private Water Supply (Firs) Systems: The appikant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District. Plans and installation shall comply with Fre District Standards. Approval of the on-site (private) fire underground and water plans is required prior to any building permit issuance for any structure on the site. Private on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards. The Building 6 Safety Division and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and • inspections. All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. Fire construction Services will Inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 2. Public Water Supply(Domestle/Fire)Systems: The applicant shall submit a plan stowing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CCWD. On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 800-foot radius of the project. Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard. All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. CCWD personnel shall Inspect the installation and witness the hydrant Hushing. Fire Construction Services shah inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD. Fire Constriction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 3. Construction Access: The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard. All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6* above the finished surface of the road. 4. Fire Flow: A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received. The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire How information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services. 5. Easements and Reelprocal Agreements: All easements and agreements must be recorded with the County of San Bernardino. • -5- Item B-36 PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The building construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire • Construction Services' 'Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures'. PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION—Please complete the following: 1. Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, 'Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers'. On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location. 2. Private Fire Hydrants: For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Constriction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on-site fire hydrants. The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for hiring the company to perform the test. A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available. The fire flow available must meet or exceed the required fire flow In accordance with the California Fire Code. 3. Fire Sprinkler System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Constriction Services. 4. Fire Sprinkler Monitoring: Prior to the issuance•of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler monitoring system must be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. The fire sprinkler monitoring system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system (subject to the release of power). 5. Fire Suppression Systems and/or other special hazard protection systems shall be inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services before occupancy • is granted and/or equipment Is placed in service. G. Fire Alarm System: Prior to the Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm system shall be installed, inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. 7. Access Control Oates: Prior to the Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards by Fire Construction Services. 8. Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fre Construction Services. The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and Identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways. 9. Address: Prior to the Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commerciaUlndustrial and multi-family buildings shall post the address in accordance to the appropriate RCFPD addressing Standard. 10. Hazardous Materials: The applicant must obtain Inspection and acceptance by Fire Construction Services. 11. Confidential Business Occupancy Information: The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District 'Confidential Business Occupancy Information" Itpm R-'37 form. This form provides contact Information for Fire District use in the event of an • emergency at the subject building or property. This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector. 12. Mapping Sib Plan: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a a %a x 11' or 11' x 17' site plan of the she In accordance with RCFPO Standard shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and building features as required in the standard. The site plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector. • • -7- Item B-38 RESOLUTION NO. 13-52 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TIME EXTENSION DRC2013-00811,A REQUEST TO EXTEND THE APPROVAL PERIOD OFA PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PROJECT (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2008-00464) TO EXPAND THE HAVEN VILLAGE COMMERCIAL CENTER WITH TWO MULTI-TENANT RETAIL BUILDINGS WITH A DRIVE-THRU TOTALING 6,484 SQUARE FEET ON A 41,821 SQUARE FOOT SITE WITHIN THE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL (NC) DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT,LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF HAVEN AVENUE AND THE SR-210 FREEWAY;AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 0201-272-23. A. Recitals. 1. Drew Willock, on behalf of CCI Lot 9 Haven, LLC,filed an application for the approval of Time Extension DRC2013-00811, extending the original approval of Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00464, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this.Resolution, the subject Time Extension request is referred to as"the application." 2. On January 28, 2009, this Commission adopted its Resolution No. 09-07, thereby approving the application subject to specific conditions and time limits. 3. On November 13, 2013, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. • 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on November 13, 2013, including written and oral staff reports,this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The applicant does not propose any changes to the original project in conjunction with this time extension request; b. The previously approved Conditional Use Permit is in substantial compliance with the City's current General Plan, specific plans, ordinances, plans, codes, and policies; C. The extension of the Conditional Use Permit approval will not cause significant inconsistencies with the current General Plan,specific plans, ordinances, plans,codes,and policies; d. The extension of the Conditional Use Permit approval will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; • and Item B-39 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-52 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TIME EXTENSION DRC2013-00811 -CCI LOT 9 HAVEN LLC November 13, 2013 Page 2 e. The extension is within the time limits established by State law and local ordinance. • 3. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)in connection with the review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA")and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the Planning Commission determined that the original project was categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 In-Fill Development Projects in connection with the City's approval of Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-000464 on January 28, 2009. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental environmental review is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project. No changes are proposed to the project; no substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicates new or more severe environmental impacts; and no new important information shows that the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered. There are no changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated when concluding the project was categorically exempt. Staff further finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not analyzed in the previous environmental review, and will not have more severe effects than previously analyzed. b. Based on these findings and all evidence in the record,the Planning Commission • concurs with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required pursuant to CEQA in connection with the City's consideration of the Time Extension DRC2013-00811 for Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00646. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above,this Commission hereby extends the duration of an existing entitlement approval by an additional 2 years and modifies the conditions of approval contained in Resolution No. 09-07 and the Standard Conditions, attached thereto and incorporated herein by this reference,to read as follows: Planning Department 1) Approval is for a 2-year time extension of the original approval of Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00464 and modification of the applicable approval time limit as described in Standard Condition B.2 contained in Resolution No. 09-07 that was adopted by the Planning Commission on January 28, 2009. 2) The new expiration date for Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00464 is January 28, 2016. 3) Any requests for future time extensions shall be subject to the procedures, conditions,and findings as set forth in Section 17.14.090 of the Development Code. • Item B-40 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-52 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TIME EXTENSION DRC2013-00811 - CCI LOT 9 HAVEN LLC November 13, 2013 Page 3 • 4) All other conditions of approval, including all of the Standard/Special Conditions of Approval from other City departments, for Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00464 under Resolution 09-07 and associated Standard Conditions shall apply. 5) An updated Water Quality Management Plan shall be submitted at the time of grading plan check that complies with the most current MS4 Permit requirements. 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2013 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Frances Howdyshell, Chairman . ATTEST: • Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced,passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of November 2013, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: • Item R-41 STAFF REPORT • PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE: November 13, 2013 RANCHO TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission cUCAMONGA FROM: Candyce Burnett, Planning Manager BY: Mike Smith, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT DRC2013-00563 - STEVE RAWLINGS FOR 909 SPORTS GRILL INC.: A request to provide live entertainment comprised of karaoke, live bands, and dancing within an existing restaurant of about 5,300 square feet in the Industrial Park (IP) District, Industrial Commercial Overlay District (ICOD), located at 11849 Foothill Boulevard, Unit A; APN: 0229-012-22. Related file: Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-00673. This action is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 — Existing Facilities. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Entertainment Permit DRC2013-00563 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions. BACKGROUND: The subject location has been the site of two previous restaurants with bars. The first, Bellissimo Pizza and Pasta, was granted the approval to operate under Conditional Use Permit • DRC2002-00785 on October 22, 2002. Following the closing of that restaurant in 2009, the entitlement to operate expired. Tropica Restaurant and Bar was granted a new approval to operate under Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-00673 on September 27, 2011 (Exhibit K). The business license for that restaurant expired on November 27, 2012 and, as a result, was presumed to be closed. The tenant space was verified as vacant during an inspection by the Business License Department on April 18, 2013. 909 Sports Grill, Inc. (dba 909 Pub & Grill) is currently operating a restaurant with a bar at the subject location under Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-00673. Per Section 17.14.090(D) of the Development Code, all permits and entitlements expire when a business is closed for more than one calendar year. Their business license to operate the restaurant with the bar was approved within this one-year timeframe in August 2013 following receipt of confirmation that they will comply with the conditions of approval of the existing Conditional Use Permit (Exhibit J) and described in Resolution No. 11-18 (Exhibit Q. As entertainment is proposed in conjunction with this restaurant and bar, in accordance with Section 17.20.020 of the Development Code and Condition of Approval #8 of the above-noted Resolution, an Entertainment Permit application for review and action by the City was submitted on July 8, 2013. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: Site - Commercial/Office Complex — Industrial Park (IP) District, Industrial Commercial Overlay District (ICOD) North - Commercial Center — Community Commercial (CC) District, Terra Vista • Community Plan South - Epicenter and Adult Sports Complex—General Industrial (GI) District Item C-1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT DRC2013-00563- STEVE RAWLINGS FOR 909 SPORTS GRILL, INC. November 13, 2013 • Page 2 East - Legal, Non-Conforming Residence and Commercial/Office Complex — Industrial Park (IP) District and General Commercial (GC) District West - Varies (commercial, industrial, and vacant property) —Industrial Park (IP) District B. General Plan Designations: Site - General Commercial North - General Commercial South - Parks East - General Commercial West - Industrial Park C. Site Characteristics: The project site is a tenant space located within Masi Plaza, a commercial/office complex of about 1,030,000 square feet (23.6 acres) that is about 1,250 feet (east to west) by about 915 feet (north to south) located at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue (Exhibit B). The commercial complex is divided by two minor streets, Masi Drive and Sebastian Way, into two (2) parts. The larger, 15-acre part is generally rectangular in shape and is bound by Foothill Boulevard to the north and Rochester Avenue to the east, with the minor streets on the west and south, respectively. On the opposite side of these minor streets is the remaining, 'L'-shaped, 8.6-acre part. The complex is comprised of numerous buildings with a combined floor area of about 267,500 square feet. The specific location of the project site is one of the in-line tenant spaces at 11849 Foothill Boulevard, Unit A, in the largest building that is situated in the center of the • complex (Exhibit C). The largest tenant within this building is 24 Hour Fitness. Other tenants within this building include Roger Dunn Golf and Vista Paint. The other buildings are single- tenant pad buildings or multi-tenant buildings situated along the above-noted streets (Exhibit 1). The buildings along Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue are occupied by restaurants such as Denny's, Wabi Sabi, and Jack in the Box. The buildings along Masi Drive and Sebastian Way are occupied by automotive repair shops and commercial offices. To the north of the subject commercial/office complex is a commercial center that includes Home Depot, The Spaghetti Factory, and ARCO. To the east is a legal, non-conforming residence and a commercial/office complex. To the south is the Epicenter and Adult Sports Complex operated by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. To the west is a vacant property, an industrial building, and Carrow's Restaurant. The commercial/office complex is zoned Industrial Park (IP) District, Industrial Commercial Overlay District (ICOD). The properties to the west is zoned Industrial Park (IP) District while the properties to the south are zoned General Industrial (GI) District. The properties to the east are zoned Industrial Park (IP) District and General Commercial (GC) District. D. Parking Calculations: The parking requirements for the restaurant and bar, and parking availability within the commercial complex, were analyzed during the review of Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-00673. At that time, it was concluded that there was a sufficient amount of parking for the restaurant and the other tenants within the complex. As this Entertainment Permit request does not include an increase in the floor area of the restaurant, the results of the previous analysis still apply and no new parking calculation is necessary. For reference, the parking calculations from the Staff Report for the Planning Director public hearing on September 27, 2011 are as follows: • Item C-2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT DRC2013-00563 -STEVE RAWLINGS FOR 909 SPORTS GRILL, INC. • November 13, 2013 Page 3 Type Floor Parking # of Spaces # of Spaces of Use Area (SF) Ratio Required Provided Food Uses (<15%) 22,500 5/1000 112.5 113 Food Uses 7,360 1/100 73.6 74 (>15%) Fitness Center 42,000 6.6/1000 277.2 278 Retail/Service/ 81,340 5/1000 406.5 412 Office Totals 153,200' 869.8 8772 'This total Floor area calculation is only for the area of the commercial complex between Foothill Boulevard and Sebastian Way and east of Masi Drive. 2 This total parking stall calculation is only for the area of the commercial complex between Foothill Boulevard and Sebastian Way and east of Masi Drive. • ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant, on behalf of 909 Sports Grill, Inc., proposes to provide entertainment consisting of live music, dancing, and karaoke to complement their restaurant and bar. The televisions will be mounted throughout the dining and bar area. The live music will range from solo musicians to five-piece bands who will perform on a stage of 108 square feet near the bar area. Dancing will be in an area of about 84 square feet immediately in front of the stage — the two (2) tables located there will be moved to make room during the hours when there is entertainment. Karaoke also will be performed on this stage when there are no live music performances (Exhibit E). The floor plan that was originally approved under Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-00673 was revised to meet the current applicant's business plan but is substantially similar. The principal dining area is located near the front of the restaurant while the bar and associated seating/service areas are located in the middle of the restaurant. An office, the kitchen, and restrooms comprise the remainder of the restaurant's floor area (Exhibit D). With the exception of the addition of the stage, the floor plan of the restaurant will not be altered by the addition of entertainment. Furthermore, the restaurant will serve a full menu of items, i.e. the menu includes a variety of food that is typical of a full-service restaurant (Exhibit H). B. Number of Employees and Hours of Operation/Activity: The applicant states that there will be eight (8) to (10) employees per shift. This number does not include the security guards. The operating hours of the restaurant and bar are currently between 11:00am and 12:00am • (midnight) Monday through Thursday, and between 11:00am and 1:00am Friday through Sunday. This is consistent with the hours of operation that were approved under the original Item C-3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT DRC2013-00563- STEVE RAWLINGS FOR 909 SPORTS GRILL, INC. November 13, 2013 • Page 4 Conditional Use Permit. The hours when live entertainment will be provided are proposed to be between 8:00 p.m. and 12:00 a.m. (midnight) on Thursday, between 8:00 p.m. and 1:00 a.m. Friday and Saturday, and between 11:00 a.m. and 1:00 a.m. on Sunday (Exhibit E). C. Security Procedures: The applicant will have two (2) licensed security guards on the premises when live music is performed. One of these security guards will be posted outside the restaurant to monitor activity in the parking lot and general vicinity. The applicant submitted a document to the City that describes their operations and outlines the restaurant's proposed security procedures. The documents describe the procedures for the use of force, incident report writing, firearms/weapons, and uniforms for security staff, door policy, and security rules (Exhibit F). Staff forwarded this document to the Police Department for their review. The Police Department accepted the procedures as submitted with the condition that each security guard's uniform have the word "Security" on it instead of the word "Regulator" as proposed by the applicant. This revision has been incorporated as a condition of approval in the Resolution of Approval. The applicant has indicated that all managers, bartenders, and servers will complete the Licensee Education on Alcohol and Drugs (LEAD) Program offered by the California Department of Alcohol Beverage Control within 30 days of being hired (Exhibit E and G). D. Land Use Compatibility: The use will be consistent with the site's development district and the surrounding land uses. The restaurant is within a commercial complex that is comprised of a variety of commercial tenants including retailers, personal services, and restaurants. There are no sensitive land uses in the vicinity of the restaurant. The entertainment activity will be • conducted indoors. The restaurant will be required to operate in compliance with the performance standards that are described in Section 17.66 of the Development Code, including noise limits which are described in Section 17.66.050(G). The hours of operation are consistent with operating hours of the commercial center. If operation of this Entertainment Permit causes adverse effects upon adjacent residences, businesses, or operations including, but not limited to noise, loitering, parking, or disturbances, the Entertainment Permit can be brought before the Planning Commission for consideration and possible suspension or revocation of the permit. E. Environmental Assessment: The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies under as a Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 - Existing Facilities - which covers the permitting of existing structures that involve negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of the lead agency's original determination. The project is for entertainment consisting of large screen televisions, live music, dancing, and karaoke at an existing restaurant and bar; no expansion or significant change to the existing tenant space is proposed. Staff finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. • Item C-4 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT DRC2013-00563 -STEVE RAWLINGS FOR 909 SPORTS GRILL, INC. • November 13, 2013 Page 5 CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. No correspondence has been received. Respectfully submitted, Candyce Bur tt Planning Manager CB:MS/Is Attachments: Exhibit A - Location Map Exhibit B - Aerial Photo Exhibit C - Site Plan Exhibit D - Floor plan Exhibit E - Business Description Exhibit F - Security Procedures Exhibit G - Brief Description of Licensee Education on Alcohol and Drugs (LEAD) Program (from ABC website) Exhibit H - Restaurant/Bar Menu • Exhibit 1 - Tenant List (within the 15-acre part of the commercial center only) Exhibit J - Letter Confirming Compliance with Conditions of Approval for Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-00673 Exhibit K - Staff Report for Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-00673 (September 27, 2011) Exhibit L - Resolution No. 11-18 for Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-00673 (September 27, 2011) Draft Resolution of Approval for Entertainment Permit DRC2013-00563 • Item C-5 a a a ��' LU5414D A0 EELn I'l } nn oOLOEN y m VTMCN,, R 'YqJ F rc i IfNN.KV Ti : MM ��0 y►�+ L u g# BANYAN STS. ,�'.` 9 auen sw u &J!YM Si 9 r - ` -� - ss E.1F": rts Wren.- swwr¢ seas T-_.. s - _ j B wNUL ; r 6rh_a ��AN q ab "'mpn"opvayr.n"..M tD9vxur naf r< r +l °.q Mo r q E[l.jMt Mp�m Ii IT 111r�NJg3 aG mnxRs n swllEa�ul, IT wrwsowsx a � L $S MrR p w"k' nLgRra IYLIrtr� Nqr n'3 Y n P pVL6t M1RNW wlnu�n �ar"°s'w o.`rpEc. a... a'^+L " v` IT. i rr a. _. .�--T,. +.. t xluxuvo eve rx[P W i 3S C4 WNY Mx.OI1L gggg gyeg, E q C9rIY C i navS Aw 7°T r r t r g E MIMxo slow +a5£y D �N f WAN. rf° if I. '— r esravn L"c� r. Yi� 'tlp 44 6 t own R Mw somw;ea € ":"a !° aweYu uvsxurr awu wa� 1. p .csr 1 S-J emnwn yW n ,wwra PARK nom' u'r• All M .qwa r ,yx rYu1 w 'p> GALA AVE a■YW:C 61 p mP� P� /.TARTI.R4or ~', NEm SS 4T yy"r"O ra pQ GIW6 m sl ,MW b GALA E eVE {Pi.o- �� Ta`a'"�n p mrw pMCIp T wn rWM. •�'n. a 0 ^ivp ,E" @i""a CYCAYOMOA �'xrann wr^• g `�v arv.. on { n ErRLys "Frs rnawR cy gg 1= =x c O$`,,,•�ioxr y I .aas rrw �wa w.r�MllOwossS wn < u o �, PwnEMnn $�X;?ny� ss ' Y.rL 13,v rr��suan+, nnmsrox U F s � . r dwwrn W`N� : rxY a..is .!-_ 9i7r ° IW'w¢G' 'Fwe°psi\ W VCiDI §, ' :purr MLuer mos �<l .s.G.",p ?!I-EIM.rrp n yw`ww urw.i E B 3r, WMIOOr j ,w$ Nlmr y'x mLluWnxra 1 �, i o,u ugKKEl . 5 .�_ 6rxgo g –a4 .uYa3 2k f E s,,�xp,�INraW'ub".a r r"c�n{' mw s �E �ruyA.r�*iiwrrxr ` U. 'Y TIT rr.a8x 7 °ELII aw E° ASF� s9 men COr IR4gm � F iL. Ow [t YAG S r i .iLw"r a d 4w xxxrxrr ',xum E/I it Tt� i SNA '? r irlono�'wrPulu c mwa �j9 r o-n `� t�,� ^xr '( \Cht'(1i,1,V;L INbA S A 4 9atUsl< •a�''�f ° �''R� Fi3 �a.ta B 'Q a J1 CEN MALI'AMKCop q 9 'C aig xu qa. !. a @ 9 y.P. l!°rG°� T Nml� sr 3 �:r G4no,ErrExusM r_f. RD rS sxrwd wr rm [ Ifvg[f.((Y i i„T, - u Ppn 'I I. �n gr Iwe wi' IT nrnxn n a ; c %as a�KB. br- --� s'wo-NEin " RIS IOR3ic r. r €e y Mw, LWT YMr1EM $ [ 3' �`slv�Y p e1^ 5 xp11WN . WINE MUSEUM BASE UNE po.w�Gr" r p.y{ nr pE[r n F .•tn R„ ,Flr• '�,nm IT� i �ye, sw Er +tl!Yvbn'. rsiw,nKs ol: wR i9 r " irr _mv[M roan IT x.�ry(mYay eao I j _.v ��.. .morn F jR.a r- usgw n _ y� J`q,1. .Y. vYro WwWIR a. 9p })u g) !'a:.�a/S }'A n� F r�wuiuxo ox aMl ola e wnyq. kArr Wlal OVV 'p j 'S W'm,vvo LVwIwYAI r%.�' ,yn Wr,p"��a,,L.lr�1 [ [W tl 8rf P LOrn MFSWWM 9rY PVxE. RR w, M 'rl cMuswRdn M wlxaroo-it woval� wmr F --lUHNMLl N ".Y�aM ,i° vLwP xmxu PROJECT SITE � 'MI��, ""a6 _ a, CHURCH - p \.f-K �; ' oannu � \ , VICTORIA GARDENS ;. I �•1i5 -xw h .�IUIERu-. i_ IOMxiwar I H ♦ I .Lwpu91 / CA .T��a�si aNYON •VM.C.A. S� y..aFP� xa'.� i' i • �WNM W.W6r'Y n pT8[ Y EW -. 9 47� I' 9Ps t g EKTILEI ann, f 'TA wwnun IT 3 _ on TERRA VISTA TOWNCENTER OSANANTO O wa�c IT MEDICALCENTER R 3 COURT I' P ,OUSE LWRElBi J' ���y�yy��y{I CITY ' II HALL r O NluexluNn. t 6F N TaeleE �� RENnacE�'. xTuas'e�. IEPICSTTERQ p sra I'C r/oSPOat Q / S, jr, x-._._.' AwL NCxR - (RANCFIO I , c CUCAMONGR O I�`i1R rl iWl.51YW i I ANIMA[ F \S EI TdR �umo W Rsurwn mean _. �sumn ss aun s$r . nnsr G S JERSEY 8LV8 ''METROLINK TRAIN 8THST �—__-- _.—. ,--�_._..iT�-•--._.�_.-.._.��.�-...--.-�-^. ^I r 'pC r(WRgTM Puvu 9 R r ynaxn wL S' 6TH Si! h'INI'Iltl:' i k REST � j R.SC C ]/ oi1 EXHIBIT AItem C-6 r } Wi X ENTERTAINMENT POMIT DRC2013-00563 � (y UD PH - P. FOOTHILL BLVD _ sk I -15r'4 tar Jt LU riv Pwr6jec A s } a - - -�-- .Site �T/• iR it ro 1 V/A sdtct Tenant, w LL ,Space t< " VWPM - IC - all , i ; . y ; _ Jt�s= _ SEBASTIAN WAY , -�` IL �. • —1 -3 L 'WA - 77 ,. - CI 'a'0- RMcow C,�C�??t�rC ADA ACCESSIBILITY r=T '. NGA DISABLED PARKMG J Q_ JUL L 0 8 2013 RTFIVED PLANNING am U& >: ail � m�••.•j1p•• W W ®+� AY111 MrLLSYB! 0 0 0 LTTO° n ; m c0 ! ❑ ffiI �- zm FI 8 fn .TµgE � CL v S TYPICAL PLAN Il\I � d V) V U, TYPICAL SECTION A-A •_ it 0I CBC FIG.I18-23A-TRUNCATED DOMES CBC 117M.5,7 _1_)_3 1_)_3 re.s.TrnuNutE000r,�s aETEcr,.c.uwNc..a.e n,LPs.WLIMVE,aEtgTNiE•"mlo nwreRTeo= 9 �, M ARL wmr.MRl OBt II a M d1A RNP.FJ4211M0 M RNA 1R9.NrCE M maw®eamea oErEcr,aE wNNNaemwla¢a+v�.ysrwrtNom�ra I t 'J Ulf� MN]m TmNUTED aa.es wary,wrETERmN..INODNW(>vl+,)TMR,! Tw�.En^w�ro.0 NOI1�..e.i„MTa.,H ar.p...y yip — — roar}ru=rNsnaMor.IKxarrxa wrrw Aaulw.IsaR roorwu•Naa m.,Ll aEN Watrazznen u ,.n s.m,RTNE aEssIENaEo eTNo.we ome MaEhtrN�+wwowu mrtnRSTvslwlr wnN RppN.aewr�,eT�Lwrtawa.INmu.RR.dauo,T. � r M N.TE..4L u�o ro rrlviaE eaN.wr Nwl E N.N.Em.LgwT a MwNgq Am•N�.Maa.�w,r eEcrosmacTTEa N,vrmxarEnmaNr wwwr � J_ o AwcE msrNPm.mwreEawra,w�,wew,Eo.�y,�>gw, ,. F oavwanw®m+nc aETECTN11E w.W=I.a NIOOUI.•IDNo mac.aaRIM.,LE! E NW1lrN=T,LIIDN Wa.L®NMfX1ON114 V�Ea w®ilAT41B�G1, r i 0 Z� TITLE H,rMt 1.MTICIE9;)N1D..IRFFA ro am TILRY,ANT 12 PNPIHO f-11,NOl,tm Nl4aNGNDfK=1}V MSEl9lRL6.`ATIOMI RMI RNCUCi Nr.!)rK O D Q EaR aETECTNtf WNL.q MmU;f9 Mp a.ECTraMN 9t.r,cA. caoU aEfRTNLEwNpNp rlbaUati NOOr3CTIU.KBWRQ.I N!!Nt®Y191.WRWw J 1.AM.Mol RE EVNwIEa Bv.uNmFwErr ENTT''.L9EC1®BYM GEPMIIE �m aENa,L .anelan a M er,rE N�cr..GrBv oo.nl.cE.wn NL aTMwn.hcEe.wuNOTRNI.vtuto.No oT.eL alnoom aw+�exra.Ems. ME..rRmUC�D..09M,CE.N1!Fm ILE N r.y�AWL WaL.a.Ev4L,naN N441 pE N COMIAT,idl..a.l M aEgRA.Na WINp..,p aOWIT' G£YfLaIEM.SEE awfMBlf CODE 9EC101..0. . BLDG DEPT NOTES 3 .� ,.., ..... I..,m.a..�.a......m....�.��....W..m.�. �,o..,�.w.,m...B .. . .,s.Mia: i3 - 6oS�3 w m • • PROPOSED AREA OF WORK PROPOSED AREA OF WORK 1T DEEP WALL TRUE T•aBFG NUND BOOKSHELF GLASS 2 DOOR NOT FGODTWr HO 67`NO PLUS ABDVE 1N MflV MpIER — ARR6AlO W DISK FlAT IOP. i mp. WASHER DESK LIQU '. WOMEN'S RR . `O� r f STO GE ePOA W K SINK (Q(D w.m •�Z SJF�/du 7F7YTMNO, Pa7A i ! AD SNKDFS ' � „^ xwa, WATER WEA B "� O "°'sFRONT � �i vPATIO AREA 0 j DIRswDIRmREFDBE °0 D" SODA DUMP (E)WALK lEl Ow SINK °IN COOLER STORAGE O 'Rau - (E)'p BO'Dla °0'•°'"` S 1 mBEER wuB( momwarNS ' Q MEN'S RR Y+RECEPTION am''� DOOR 0 W%IrMPDCWAY ar tea'' SFA BFNDI r 4I¢cFrTnK BAR (I —� as WI/(IEA y� t�yp�rtr l�q�pp W�pD�p AIR J _ "DRUMM" YVFP 3558M DIBRAT 1Y9 SIDxISE II MICRO AIM O a Qip'1BWp ♦A as V _ O '"COI I;reL,OP ® ® ® ® ® ® ® _ m FRONT e fid I ev0" i BAR AREA"� vW I'f QO� FL— Bva" `O Aw;T PATIO AREA 2 eo-Du ` r ji, _ OFFICE d' O � � 0 LL VIP BOTTLE SERVICE AREAVIP BOTTLE SERVICE AREA (E) PATIO AREAO® � BUILDING ® wNaB - O TAG O O co PLOY FIRE SPRINKLER -- - RISER ROOM — LOLIO:RS, a PROPOSED AREA OF WORK Z x oT.wauwwrcvoe«eew. ADA VAN w.ro.KA«xaaawns,aanf o FLOOR PLAN PARKING Qm m oACCESSIBLE PARTITION PLAN LEGEND DOOR SCHEDULE Fes-o SWIM m °roEwwmnaTr x. ' T�Iu, .mr•.eo,maa:uru o xm+.o...me.mac«w. .mxsmo..eaer. O O O LL U O ,�. � •.,a,v��..,.romw,..��.em m «'�'°°.e%°rwiaeE _xa«mx ac �2 waDcn.rowxX u°w« numrn«areao.c aro aw:w';'=«",..SO�iI«`.'v,"'2x°ealiw«,mHax°m.`ua"^^KwcoN>a'°�a w=maamral«x°r,'O "`ioe K: � xxmwBLcs.nxxsneuuLAT «ax.FiM1«DOE FTU.aiE mNtLDINLq ««m. m a O O NarNN,xrEwu on. eR wFnwu,c�alwn arm m«omrceAa. a ,•sxxaracwu ec�ws. /� I IkTER6Ym,I mKIKa«accacaN xcaw®. "I'ao.O.c..ax0DF2fX,O4.4m°aLc . O O °FXST.WUnM°aDaE CQMMTACTILE EXIT ROUTE SWN E Wnrtmnwq,laaTuaLLxlTaa„w I°,sur„ � mq CIXr.°Or1CYlRK 9°M IMbET .m—mrrw°Ol MO90 aGGOM If"F]11000Ei� .G�«E ® ADA axN.T]x�DaER-m.Taa.nm «mw ua s romv BOr sa OCOgE1E 0.00R YR11, ACCESSIBLE O -m^maE. m«.=a..a•,y- IAKA.axxSR.iOpxEAa 0�0°O�ApmgI�M�o.4V p° /J1aOr�11pa9HElOMfE PARKING xwB-aLEncona.am,suN �rKa„�I�.o a,,.«wnx� ma�»o«,raa�rA�m«� ..— ..... •— l�nnm«o-asERnn,r.Ias,nAn xa�q�UJ.nEA.xx«w�'mlaaOYV.`rx' O °”"cI(«M°„'a1O”"m..",'°",..r°,°F�al,la°a�rx,ar LOW PARTITION TYPE'D'DETAILG A-03 . 909 Pub & Grill CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 11849 E. Foothill Blvd., Unit A G0�3 Rancho Cucamonga, CA SEP 2 5 2013 Statement of Operations RECEIVED , PLANNING September 15, 2013 The proposed use will be pub and grill style restaurant with live entertainment and Type 47 ABC license. Restaurant Hours of Operations- Monday-Thursday: l lam to 12:00am Friday-Sunday: Ilam to 1:00am Live Entertainment Hours- Thursday- Saturday Spm- 1:00am Sundays- l lam - 1:00am Entertainment- 909 Sports Grill will have large screen TVs mounted throughout the dining and bar areas. In addition, there will be 12'x 9'stage for live bands and karaoke entertainment Music will range from soloists up to 5 piece bands and genre will vary from jazz to blues to country to Top • 40 sounds. Employee Information: All 909 Pub and Grill managers,bartenders and servers will complete the CA Dept of Alcoholic Beverage Control's L.E.A.D.Training program within 30 days of being hired. Estimated employees on-site: 8 to 30 per shift not including security guards Security Personnel- 909 Pub&Grill will employ 2 licensed security guards anytime that live music is featured. i security guard will be outside the building monitoring activity in the parking lot and around the building.Attached is the detailed Security Procedures that will be in place for the restaurant Dress Code:A dress code will be strictly enforced whenever live music is featured.The dress code will be posted in a conspicuous place near the front door.The dress code will read as follows: • No Gang Attire • No Cuts&Colors • No hats • No holes in pants • Dress shoes and collared shirts required for men. • EXHIBIT E Item C-10 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA lyc'L013 066) 909 Pub s Grill SEP 25 2013 11949 8. Foothill Blvd., Unit A Rancho Cucamonga, CA SECURITY PROCEDURES RECEIVED - PLANNING The purpose of security personnel,, is to provide a safe environment in the Restaurant. Our top priority is to finish our security personnel with the appropriate knowledge to handle any situation that may arise in the course of employment.The tools provided here are based on principles expertly designed to provide a safe environment for our staff,patrons,and property. Use of Foree Regardless of the number of security staff,all contact with our patrons should follow the basic guidelines of the Use of Force Matrix. This Matrix is broken into 5 steps: I. Apparent Force This Force is created by the visual sense of authority our staff projects. It is our staffs appearance,attitude,demeanor and body postures These elements should be professional and create a sense of authority to all patrons observing us. This enables the patrons to know who is an employee and that when the employee approaches them,they should pay heed to any inshilctions or requests. This level of force is not achieved by intimidation,but rather by courteous professionalism. 11. Constructive Force This Force is the result of the spoken word; what our staff says to our • patrons. This level should continue the line of professionalism and helpfulness. Profanity used towards the patron expressly forbidden. The goal here is to give the patron the impression that our staff is here to help. We know that as long as the patron feels our staff is hying to help them,they will continue to let our staff try. The moment the patron feels intimidated,insulted or offended,then they become defensive and our staffs job of gaining compliance is greatly hamper M. Physical Force This Force is where our staff would place their hands on our patrons to restrain and or remove them from our venue. This force is only authorized when a patron presets an unquestionably unsafe element to our environment or other patrons. We do not create a fight; we prevent them. All holds will be implemented with the intent of restraining rather than inflicting pati[. No pain compliant holds should be utilized. Choke holds or any holds around the neck are not authorized. Whenever feasible, two employees should approach the unruly patron and work as a team. Though individual holds may be necessary, it is always better to have two employees restrain/remove a patron. IV. Defensive Force This Force provides for an employee to defend himself against a physical attack. There are three options our employee has if he or she is attacked: 1)Push away from the patron and create distance while calling for assistance. 2) Immediately EXHIBIT F Page 1 of 6 Item C-11 grab the attacker and restrain them with the least amount of force necessary. 3)As a last resort, strike the patron to stun them and immediately grab the attacker to restrain them. Continued strikes,be either fist or feet,without regard to restraint,will constitute excessive force for which we, the venue and our employee may be held civilly and/or criminally responsible. V. Deadly Force This Force is to be used only if a patron expresses the intent to kill or cause grievous bodily injury to another,has a weapon(either personal such as fist or feet or mechanical such as a knife or gun),and has the capability to carry out the threat. In situations where deadly force is real,our staff is instructed to immediately call 9-1-1 and remove all potential victims from the attacker. It is not recommended that our staff attempt to disarm the attacker,but instead to safeguard other patrons and employees. This Matrix serves as a constant reference tool for security. Our staffs reactions are required to be congruent to the incident in displaying the appropriate level of response. Any physical contact should be based on the least amount of force necessary to accomplish the objective of restraint. Pain compliant holds and choke holds are expressly forbidden. A quick role of thumb is to respond to non-physical incidents in a non-physical manner and to respond to physical incidents in a physical manner,using the least amount of physical response as is necessary to ensure everyone's safety. However,there are those times when a non-physical incident may result in a physical response. At times like those,out security has been trained to • utilize a technique referred to as C.RO.C. which is outlined below: • Command Ask or tell the patron to do or stop doing something—This is to be done in a stern,but pleasant manner.(e.g. Good Evening,sir. My name is Shane;I'm security here at the bar. I'm going to need you to put your shirt back on while inside the bar. Thank you very much.). • Reasons Why you need the patron to do or stop doing something, if they do not comply with your command—Umuly patrons may respond to our request if given a reason why we require their compliance.(e.g. 1 know it's but in here and you don't want to put your shirt on sir,but it's a house policy that guys must wear shirts while in the bar. So,if you could just put your shirt back on,I'd appreciate it.Thanks.). • Options Explain what options the patron has and the potential outcomes of those options—People do not want to be forced to do anything,but if given options,a patron is likely to comply. (e.g.OK, sir. I understand you don't want to put your shirt back on,but that really only leaves us two options:One,you put the shirt back on and stay inside the bar and continue to have a good time,or Two,if you choose to keep the shirt off, I'm going to have to ask you to leave and I really don't want you to Page 2 of 6 • Item C-12 go. I'm glad you're here. So why don't you just put the shirt on and stay in the Restaurant? Thanks.). • Confirmation—Again,we understand that people want to be treated with respect and want their opinions heard.Ask patron if they have any suggestions to amicably rectify this issue(e.g.Sir is there anything I can do to get you to put your shirt on so you can stay in the bar?) If the patron refuses to comply with the laws of the city of Rancho Cucamonga and the state of California OR to follow the house policy established to maintain a safe environment and security has used C.RO.C.,then security is now authorized to use minimal physical force to remove the patron from our venue. Hands-on is still, always,a last resort Incident Report Wrldn¢ All staff needs to provide a thorough account of any incident Examples of when reports should be completed are fights,injury,medical or law enforcement involvement,severely intoxicated patrons,and any crimes(e.g. Larceny from a patron,refusing to pay for services,destruction of property). These reports must include the date and time of the incident names of the employees involved, participants and any witnesses. The reports of all staff need to be clear and chronologically organized so that the reader can get a clear picture of not only the incident,but the response to the incident. These reports are required to be completed • by the end of the employee's shift and faxed to the insurance provider by close of that business day. Firearms/Weapons At no time are employees allowed to carry and guns,knives,other weapons,or chemical agents. This prohibition includes flashlights that are larger than 2 AA batteries. Uniform The uniform consists of a colored shirt that reads"Regulator'in a solid script not less than 2"so that patrons can easily identify who is in charge.The uniform must be wom at all times while our security personnel are on the clock. The uniform must be tucked in and pressed so that their appearance is professional. Door Poll No patron will be served alcohol without providing a valid form of identification when requested. We comply with suggested guidelines of the California Alcohol Beverage Control Commission which states that establishments granted liquor licenses are only to accept"bona fide"identification which is defined as ID that is Page 3 of 6 e JJdTf : rAOE S 13 A • bVFLIDTrc �r PAgE ? Item C-13 currently valid and issued by a governmental agency.Valid forms of identification include: a state driver's license with photo, a military ID, a Passport, or a state-issued identification card with photo. In accordance with California law,we do not accept foreign ID. Each ID will be checked at the door before the patron is allowed to enter the establishment, and should be checked again at the bar if the server feels a patron may be underage.We follow the California guidelines which suggest carding anyone who looks under 30. Any employee who is responsible for checking identification is required to adequately handle the identification. They must read the ID and feel for raised pictures or fraying laminate on the card. The card must also be inspected to ensure the person presenting the card looks like the person on the ID,and that the ID is not expired. Simply looking at an ID for the birth date is not an adequate ID check. If there is any question as to the authenticity of the ID,we may ask the patron questions about the card such as what is your address,what is your astrological sign, what day were you born,etc.. Anytime we suspect an ID is a fake we will deny entry to a patron. Also, a patron will be refused entry into the restaurant if they aro visibly intoxicated or otherwise impaired before they eater the restaurant. Basic Security Roles 1. Force will only be used when it is necessary to ensure the safety of the venue, • other employees,or patrons.All use of force should be aimed at restraining the patron,not for fighting or hurting them. No hand-strikes are to be used unless an employee or patron is faced with serious physical injury or deadly force. 2. Security employees must not leave their post unless they are relieved by another employee. 3. Cell phones are not to be used when the security employee is at their post. 4. Security employees are not allowed to consume alcohol or use drugs during their Shift. 5. Security employees are responsible for keeping their area of the Restaurant clean from spills and debris which could cause injury to another person. 6. If two combatants from a fight are separated,they are to be ejected through separate doors. The combatants should also be ejected at different times(i.e. eject the most aggressive combatant and wait 10 minutes to eject the other combatant). Always treat patrons with respect and courtesy. Use phrases like"please"and"thank you"often. Be stem but patient Page 4 of 6 1f PACE t 3, NC't-i CATS cF PA4'b • Item C-14 California ABC - Licensee Education on Alcohol and Drugs Page I of l Search :'(j' HOME A13OUT US BUSINESS I.AWS, RULES AND REGS [SERVICES 01HER Licensee Education on Alcohol and Drugs Popular Links (L.E.A.D) Press Releases Application I Selection&Forms To view the 2013 LEAD Training Schedule click here Industry Advisories License Types I Fees What is the LEAD Program? License Query System The LEAD Program is a free,voluntary prevention and education program for retail licensees. Licensing Reports their employees and applicants.It began on January 1,1991 with a grant from the California Public Records Requests Office of Traffic Safety. Server Awareness(LEAD)Training Since February 1995,the Department M Alcoholic Beverage Control has funded the program. License Application,Protest and Disciplinary Sin.1991,the LEAD Program has trained over 100,000 people. Protease. The curriculum is designed for licensees,managers,and employees.There is no separate Annual Reports management curriculum,Program length is}1/2 hours,except for Fairs/Special Events Training,which i.2 hours. W Prevention/Education Programs Participation is limited to persona per class.Moro on training.... Responsible Beverage Service(RBS)Training LEAD's Mission Provider Program The mission of the LEAD Program is to provide high quality,effective and educationally sound Licensee Education on Alcohol and Drugs(LEAD) training on alcohol responsibility and the law to California retail licensees and their employees. Program(ABC's award winning server awareness hearing program for licensees) The Department of to t Alcoholic a Beverage Controveragel expels and encourages licensees to act Informed Merchants Preventing AI.ho4Refated responsibly relative to their alrghplic beve2ge license privileges. Crimes and Tendencies(IMPACT) The LEAD Program provides the licensee and applicant with practical information an serving Retail Operating Standards Task For.(ROSTF) alcoholic beverages sorely,responsibly,and legally,and preventing illicit drug actively at the Alcohol Issues Partnership licensed establishment. p Pro tett with CA University Systema Statements of Support The Governors Prevention Advisory Counclrs Underage Drinking Prevention Nbrkgroup • 'On behalf of the Board Of Directors and Awards that the al of o National nt OrAlcoholic l oh Against Drunk Driving,itis my pleasureel confirm that the Annual ducadmeM or Aeventi c Beverage Control has loam selected to receive our Eleventh Annual Education and Prevention Award.Among a field of very strong contenders,your submission of the LEAD Project was deemed the best example of the outstanding work being done across the country to redo.the incidence of drunk and impaired driving' Terrance D.Schiavone,President National Commission Against Drunk Driving September 29, 1995 We are fortunate to have a program like LEAD to assist us In promoting cooperation between licensees and law enforcement.... James Cost ChIM or Police Campbell Police Department 'The LEAD Program is an absolutely remains:Program.As a retailer I can't tell you how invaluable it is to have thew continuous training programs far our management and staff.By educating our management and staff we can operate our business in a truly professional manner" Jim Kavanagh Kavanagh Liquors Home I Privacy Policy) Technical Support I Site Map Off ice of Governor I BCSH Agency) ABL Executive Staff I Back to Top I Conditions of Use I Accesslbillty I Email Us Copyright J 2012 State of California *XHIBIT G ams/lead.html Item C-15 11/5/2013 nine - 0 — nine sports grill 1234 foothill blvd rancho cucamonga, c. a. 91786 open daily- weekdays 11 : 00 am brunch - lunch - dinner - late Night • 909-123-4567 small plates house made potato chips $5- soaked in beer, fresh herbs, served w/ malt vinegar aioli devil'e on horseback $7 - blue cheese stuffed dates wrapped in apple wood smoked bacon grilled artichoke $8- wood fired artichoke w/ myer lemon aioli sizzling garlic shrimp $10- white prawns with garlic, chili, lemon, parsley, grilled sourdough bread. cheese fondue pot $B- gruyere tine cheese pagne. served with bread, pink lady apple wedges, veggi , a hard Salam build your own guacamole $7 house made mozzarella sticks p osciutto and zz rella wrapped in spring roll and topped with panko bread cr ahi poke $10 - Kauai style ahi o e with sushi ri e honey -sriracha glazed buffalo i gs $10 - twist he classic buffalo wings. if you like extra spicy ask for s CHa dressing. • roasted eggplant dip w/ spiced pita crisp $8 charcuterie late $10 - as ed sa i, 4 p pate roti;" use pickle, artisan bread prosciutto wrapped melon portobello fries $8- ligh atter ortobel ^mro us m served w/garlic aioli lamb chop lollipops $10- h Iney worces yf7prshire oeg�n rinade, grilled smashed potatoes. J 909 fried quesadilla $8- crisp tortilla filled with-meat, peppers, onion, and cheese soup/salad daily house soup - in-house, farm-fresh ingredients. ask server for details french onion $6 - caramelized onion stock, spanish sherry, gruyere and provolone, sourdough crouton. caesar - $8 baby romaine, parsley, parmesan reggiano, tossed in our House Made caesar dressing. add grilled natural chicken breast or shrimp $4 heirloom tomato salad $10 - heirloom tomatoes, watermelon, burrata, arugula, balsamic, and micro basil beet salad $8 - candy striped beets, goat cheese, arugula , shallot champagne vinaigrette farmers market $8- asparagus, artichoke, avocado, mint, corn, manchego, champagne vinaigrette #XHIBIT H Item C-16 between bread the 909 burger $9 - pickled red onion, tallegio, wild rocket, • house made ketchup, rosemary bun, garlic fries short rib tacos $8 - slow braised short ribs, pickled red onions, cotija cheese, salsa borracho pork belly sliders $8 - pickled carrots, cucumber, sesame aioli and cilantro w/ slow roasted pork belly b&b sliders $8 - caramelized onions, blue cheese & nueske bacon. bbq pulled chicken or pork sliders $8 - our spicy house made bbq sauce tossed with your choice of meat, pickle, ranch brick oven flatbread fresh mozzarella / parmigianino reggiano / ricotta / arugula $9 house sliced peppe i fresh mozz Ila micro basil $10 roasted r t / fresh b it urrata $9 prosciutto de parma r sted garlic rash egg / garden • herbs, ricotta s r cream / whi ffle oil $11 roasted crimini mush a /sautged lee white truffle oil, pa ianino reggiano $ 2 Spanish choriz sausage / sal / house made spicy t sauce / house c ae blend X'.day flatbread "ek ates asian style breis short r a $24- t�ejder �h t ribs, asparagus, jasmine xice I i house chicken $14 - free r9 jidori c� icke , garden fresh herbs, garlic, coked under a brick fish & chips $14 - Newcastle beer battered cod, caper remoulade, malt vinegar pan seared wild sockeye salmon $22- organic succotash, roasted red pepper colis • bbq baby back ribs $21 - slow iie'rRe-g7ribs, garlic smashed Draft Beers Bud Light/Newcastle/Stella/ Deadlift IPA • Shock Top/312 Goose Island Honkers Goose Island Bottled Beers Budweiser/Bud Light/ Budweiser Black Crown Coors Light/Miller Lite/Michelob Ultra Negra Modelo/ Corona/Corona Light/ Dos XX Fat Tire/New Belgium 1554 Heineken/Heineken Light/Blue Moon/ Amstel Ligh Arrogant Bastard/Sam Adams/Sam Summer Ale Stone Pale Ale/ Stone IPA/Levitation/Ruination Guinness/Blue Moon/Chimay Blue/Sierra Nevada Ace Pear Cider/Ace Berry Cider/Ace Apple Cider Coors N/A Red Wine House Cabernet 7/21 Smith&Hook Cabernet 12/45 Apothic (Blend) 8.5/32 Gnarly Head Merlot 10/35 909 Red Sangria 8 White Wine./Champapne House Chardonnay 7/21 Hess Select Chardonnay 10/40 • Francias Coopola 10/40 Stellina di Norte Pinot Grigio 8/30 909 White Sangria 8 Korbel Split 8 Chandon Half Bottle$25 Champagne Drinks Bellini:Champagne&Mathilde Peach Liqueur Hibiscus: Champagne w/Cranberry Juice Mimosa: Champagne&01 Kir Royale:Chambord&Champagne The Ghost:Melon Liqueur&Champagne La Rosette:St. Germaine&Champagne PLEASE DON'T DRINK AND DRIVE Shots 7 Birthday Cake Vanilla Vodka and Hazelnut Liqueur Served with a sugar rimmed lemon wedge • Washington Apple Crown Royal,DeKuyper Apple Pucker and Cranberry Juice Kool Aid Vodka,DeKuyper Melon,Amaretto and Cranberry Juice Pear Kamikaze Absolut Pear,Triple Sec,and fresh Lime Juice White Gummy Bear Bacardi Raz,Peach Schnapps,fresh Lime Juice,and a splash of Sprite Grape Gumdrop Vodka,Grape Schnapps,and a splash of Sprite Pineapple Upside Cake Vanilla Vodka,Pineapple Juice,and Grenadine Cherry Lifesaver Amaretto,Southern Comfort,and Cranberry Juice Sexy Alligator Layered Melon&Pineapple,Chambord,and topped with Jagermeister Ask Your Favorite Bartender to make you their Favorite Shot!!!! Bomb Shots $8 Jager Bomb/Blasters • Jagermeister and Red Bull Energy Drink Skinny Bomb Chilled Vodka and Sugar Free Red Bull Raspberry Bomb Raspberry Vodka and Red Bull Energy Drink Cherry Bomb Cherry Flavored Vodka and Red Bull Tuaca Bomb Shot of Chilled Tuaca and Red Bull Sunkist Orange Flavored Vodka,Orange Soda,and a Splash of OJ Irish Car Bomb Shot of Jameson and Irish Cream with Guinness Orange Tic Tac Orange Flavored Vodka and Red Bull Energy Drink Grape Escape Three Olives Grape and Red Bull Energy Drink Shoot The Root Root Beer Schnapps and light beer Southern Comfort,Watermelon Schnapps and Red Bull Virginia Vag Red Bull and Cranberry Juice with Gin,Stoli Blueberry, Black Raspberry Liqueur • Cocktails Hawaiian Malibu Rum,splash of Blue Curacao,Pineapple Juice,and topped with Myers Rum-$9 • 909 Surfer Malibu Rum,Amaretto,Pineapple Juice and Cranberry Juice garnished with an Orange-$8 White Gummy Bear Bacardi Raz,Peach Schnapps,fresh Lime Juice&Sprite-$7 Adult Sweet Tea Seagram's Sweet Tea flavored Vodka mixed with Lemonade-$8 909 Mango Margarita Tres Sietes Tequila mixed with our Mango Margarita mix and topped with Patron Citronage-$8 Rum Runner Malibu Coconut Rum,House Rum,mixed with Orange Juice,and Pineapple Juice and topped with Myers and a splash of 151 Bacardi Rum-$10 Berry Press Ciroc Red Berry,Club Soda,and a splash of Sprite-$8 Naughty School Girl Pear Vodka,X-Rated,Pineapple Juice,Cranberry Juice and • Sprite$8 Adult Lemonade Citrus Vodka, Muddled Lemons,Lemonade$8 Slap Yo Mama Margarita Jose Traditional Muddled w/Fresh Oranges and Jalapenos,Agave,Sweet&Sour,topped with Patron Citronage.(Spicy)$8 Peach Jamboree Ciroc Peach,Orange Juice, Sauvignon Blanc,Soda$8 rancho Drama Queen Berry Rum,Cherry Rum,Muddled with Fruit,Cranberry, Orange Juice,and Sweet&Sour$8 Dark&Stormy Kracken Spiced Rum and Ginger Beer$8 Root Beer Float 3 Olives Root Beer Vodka,with Whipped Cream Vodka, Topped w/Coca Cola 8 • MASIPLAZA • Engrave N Embrodier Things 8188 Rochester Avenue Suite A Rancho Computer 881M1688 Rochester Avenue Suite B ,'sP3=RQChseNlAYy[MIR The Vapour Lounge 8188 Rochester Avenue,Suite D ~` Jack in the Box 11787 Foothill Blvd. 24 Hour Fitness 11787 Foothill BIW. Popeyes 11815 Foothill BIW.,Suite A Manila Sunset-H 8 L Finest.Inc. 11815 Foothill Blvd.,Suite a Bobalicious Tea House 11815 Foothill BIW.,Suite C Taw Hut 11815 Foothill Blvd.,Suite E Legend Nails 11819 Foothill BIW.,Suite A Jurrask Pets 11819 Foothill BIW.,Suite B Yen Jiang MullerSunshine Foot 11819 Foothill Blvd.,Suite C Nutrition 4 Less 11819 Foothill Blvd.,Suite D Designer$u9 Outlet 11819 Foothill Blvd.,Suite F EKY 11819 Foothitl Blv11.,Suite H . Wad Sabi 11837 Foothill Blvd.,Suite B Gard's Musk: 11837 Foothill Blvd.,Suite C 909 Spall Bar&Grill 11849 Foothill Blvd.,Suits A Roger Dunn Goll 11849 Foothill Blvd.,Suite D \Asia Paint 11849 Foothill Blvd.,Suite E Stadium Dental 11897 Foothill Blvd.,Suite A No. 1 Pho Noodle&Grill 11897 Foothill Blvd.,Suite B 0ig Mike Barber Shop 11897 Foothill Blvd.,Suite C Denys 11899 Foothill Blvd. 4EXHIBIT I Item C-21 • S P O R T S G R I L L City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91730 Re: CUP NO. DRC2011-00673 To Whom It May Concern: 1, Leon Fregoso, owner of 909 Sports Grill,have leased the space located at 11849 Foothill Blvd, #A, Rancho Cucamonga and will comply with the previous CUP No. DRC2011-00673 in its entirety. 1 recognize the need to obtain an Entertainment permit before any live entertainment is to be conducted. Should you need further information,please contact Melinda at 909-231-9274. Respectfully, CEO ifXH I B IT J 11849 Foothill Blvd, #A Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Item C-22 STAFF REPORT Planning Department RANCHO DATE: September 27, 2011 CUCAMONGA TO: James R. Troyer,AICP, Planning Director FROM: Lawrence J. Henderson,AICP, Principal Planner BY: Steve Fowler,Assistant Planner SUBJECT: NON-CONSTRUCTION CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2011-00873-GHOMRI RESTAURANT GROUP, INC-A request to re-establish a restaurant and bar within a 5,000 square foot unit located at Masi Plaza in the Industrial Park District(Subarea 7) at 11849 Foothill Boulevard, Unit A. APN: 229-011-47. Related File: Public, Convenience or Necessity DRC2011-00880.This action is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301, existing facilities. SITE DESCRIPTION: ® A. Surroundina Land Use and Zonina: North - Commercial center—Community Commercial District,Terra Vista Community Plan South - Epicenter Sports Complex—General Industrial Subarea 8 • East - Single-family home and retail/office center—General Commercial West - Partially developed commercial center—industrial Park Subarea 7 B. General Plan Designations: Project Site- General Commercial North - General Commercial South - Park East - General Commercial West - General Commercial C. Site Characteristics: Ghomri Restaurant Group, Inc. for Tropics Restaurant and Bar is proposing a restaurant and bar within Building 13 in the Masi Plaza commercial development, located at 11849 Foothill Boulevard,UnitA.The Conditional Use Permit application includes a restaurant with a bar. Unit A is approximately 5,000 square feet and is located within a 287,500 square foot mixed use center with retail, auto service, multi-tenant commercial and industrial uses. `' ,IXHIBIT K Item B Item C-23 roft10 Ij PLANNING DIRECTOR STAFF REPORT DRC2011-00673-GHOMRI RESTAURANT GROUP, LLC September 27, 2011 Page 2 I • D. Parking Calculations: Number of Number of Square Parking Spaces Spaces Tvoe of Use Footage Ratio Required Provided Food Uses (15%) 22,500 5/1000 112.5 113 Food Uses 7,360 10/1000 73.6 74 (Exceeds 15%) Fitness Center 42,000 6.6/1000 277.2 278 Retail/Service/Office 81,340 5/1000 406.5 412 Totals 153,200' 869.8 877•' 'This square footage total is only for the area between Foothill Boulevard and Sebastian Way and east of Masi Drive. "This parking space total is only for the lots between Foothill Boulevard and Sebastian Way and east of Masi Drive. • ANALYSIS: A. Background: Conditional Use Permit DRC2002-00785 was previously approved for this location for the sale of distilled spirits in conjunction with a restaurant with a bar.The hours of operation for that approval were from 10:00 a.m.to 12:00 a.m.,7 days a week with extended hours until 1:00 a.m. Wednesday through Saturday. The tenant was requested to submit a new Conditional Use Permit application due to a change in business hours and the previous operator had ceased business for more than 180 days. The business license for Bellissimo Pizza and Pasta was closed in early 2009. B. General: The applicant, Ghomh Restaurant Group, LLC for Tropica Restaurant and Bar has applied for a Non-Construction Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-00673 in order to operate a restaurant with bar to sell distilled spirits for on site consumption within Masi Plaza at 11849 Foothill Boulevard, Unit A, in the Industrial Park District Subarea 7. The floor plan of the restaurant will remain virtually the same as the previous restaurant as will the hours of operation. f he applicant is proposing the operating hours to be Monday through Thursday 11:00 a.m. to 12:00 a.m. and Friday through Sunday 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 a.m. B-1 • Item C-24 Alk PLANNING DIRECTOR STAFF REPORT ORC2011-00673—GHOMRI RESTAURANT GROUP, LLC September 27, 2011 Page 3 C. Land Use Comnatibility: The property is in the Masi Plaza commercial center within Industrial Park (IP) Subarea 7, which allows for a variety of retail, personal and professional services, including sit-down restaurants with the service of distilled spirits. As such, the Tropica Restaurant and Bar will be a compatible land use consistent with other restaurant uses in the center. A restaurant with bar use was previously approved under Conditional Use Permit DRC2002-00785 and conducted business until early 2009 within this unit.No entertainment is proposed for this site and the hours of operation are consistent with the center.The Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) agency was contacted and the area is over saturated with Type 47 (On-Sale General for Bona Fide Public Eating Place License); accordingly a Public Convenience or Necessity application (DRC2011-00880) has been filed for review and consideration. D. Parking: The site currently contains 877 total parking spaces. With the current tenants and vacant spaces being calculated as retail,there is a surplus of 7 parking spaces.The surplus has been calculated using the parking requirement for shopping centers under 600,000 square feet but more than 25,000 square feet of leasable area(Section 17.12.040-B-1-b(1). This Section of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code allows for the parking requirement to be 5 spaces for each 1,000 square feet of gross leasable space. Section 17.12.040-B-1-b(3)(a)of the Development Code states that 15 percent of the gross leasable area can be food services and may utilize the requirement of 5 spaces for each 1,000 square feet, but any food service uses over the 15 percent will be required to utilize the 1 space for ® every 100 square feet of leasable area. E. Environmental Assessment: The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is • categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 3 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301,which covers the operation and minor alteration of an existing facility.The project entails the operation of a restaurant with barwithin a 5,000 square foot unit within a multi-tenant building.Staff finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment since the building was intended to be used as a retail-type use and the proposed restaurant's operational characteristics will create the same or less of an environmental impact as retail use. The Planning Director has reviewed the Planning Department staff's determination of exemption,and based on his own independent judgment, concurs in the staffs determination of exemption. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper,the property was posted,and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. Staff has not received any letters or phone calls expressing concern over the Conditional Use Permit. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the approval of Non-Construction Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-00673 to allow a 5,000 square foot restaurant with a bar to sell distilled sprits within an existing building through the adoption of the attached Resolution with Conditions. • B-2 Item C-25 PLANNING DIRECTOR STAFF REPORT DRC2011-00673-GHOMRI RESTAURANT GROUP, LLC September 27, 2011 Page 4 • Respectfully submitt , Ja Troyer,AICP Pla er Director JT/SF/vv Attachments: ExhibitA - Site Plan Exhibit B - Floor Plan Exhibit C - Site parking calculations Exhibit D - Business Plan Letter Draft Resolution of Approval for Non-Construction Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-00673 • B-3 • Item C-26 RESOLUTION NO.11-18 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING DIRECTOR OF THE CITY OF • RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. DRC2011-00673, A REQUEST TO ESTABLISH A BAR FOR ON-SITE CONSUMPTION OF DISTILLED SPIRITS IN CONJUNCTION WITH A RESTAURANT LOCATED IN A LEASED SPACE OF 5,000 SQUARE FEET WITHIN BUILDING 13 OF MASI PLAZA, IN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK DISTRICT SUBAREA 7, LOCATED AT 11849 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, UNIT A - AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF-APN: 229-011-47. A. Recitals, 1. The applicant,Ghomri Restaurant Group,LLC.for Tropics Restaurant and Bar,filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit No.DRC2011-00673,as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as"the application." 2. On the 27th day of September 2011, the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW,THEREFORE, it is hereby found,determined,and resolved by the Planning Director of • the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. The Planning Director hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and cored. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to the Planning Director during the above-referenced public hearing on September 27, 2011, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, the Planning Director hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located at the southwest comer of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue,with a street frontage of 933 feet along Foothill Boulevard, and lot depth of approximately 691 feet, and is presently improved with a mixed use center including restaurants with bars serving distilled spirits; and b. The property to the north of the subject site across Foothill Boulevard is developed with a commercial center;the property to the south is the Epicenter Sports Complex;the property to the east contains a single-family residence and a retail/office complex;and the property to the west is partially developed with a commercial center; and C. The site is physically suitable for the type of use proposed.The site is located in a single-story, multi-tenant commercial building in which this tenant space was previously approved for a similar type use; and d. The applicant proposes the sale of alcoholic beverages for on-site consumption within a sit down restaurant requiring a Type 47 Liquor License issued by the California State Department of Alcoholic Beverages Control (ABC); OXHIBIT L Item C-27 PLANNING DIRECTOR RESiTION NO. 11-18 IV DRC2011-00673—GHOMRI RESTAURANT GROUP, LLC September 27, 2011 Page 2 • e. The applicant proposes the sale and on-site consumption of alcoholic beverages at a restaurant that serves lunch and dinner seven days a week. The bar area will be located in the middle of the restaurant and will be open to the rest of the restaurant. The applicant does not propose offering any entertainment or dancing; and f. The hours of operation will be Monday through Thursday from 11:00 a.m. to 12:00a.m.; Friday through Sunday from 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 a.m.; and g. Staff does not anticipate that the sale of distilled spirits will have a detrimental effect on the surrounding property owners as long as the business is appropriately managed and is in conformance with the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control regulations. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to the Planning Director during the above-referenced public hearing, and upon the speck findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, the Planning Director hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of Development Code,and the purposes of the district in which the site is located as it is a commercial use that provides choice and competition for merchants and residence; and b. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materialty injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity since the use is compatible with surrounding land uses; and C. The application,which contemplates operation of the proposed use,complies with • each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code as it requires a Conditional Use Permit to serve distilled spirits for on-site consumption with a meal and this application satisfies that requirement. 4. The Planning Director hereby finds and determines that the project identified in this Resolution is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970,as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder,pursuant to Section 15301 of the State CEQA Guidelines. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, the Planning Director hereby approves the application,subject to each and every condition set forth below: Planning Department: 1) Approval is hereby granted for the sale and service of distilled spirits in conjunction with a full-service restaurant use located at 11849 Foothill Boulevard,Unit A. The restaurant use shall be a"bona fide eating place" as defined in California Business and Professions Code Section 23038. 2) Approval shall expire,if the permits are not issued or the approved use has not commenced, within 5 years of this date. • Item C-28 PLANNING DIRECTOR RESCTION NO. 11-18 4011 ORC2011-00673—GHOMRI RESTAURANT GROUP, LLC September 27, 2011 Page 3 • 3) Approval of this application is contingent on the approval of the Public Convenience or Necessity application DRC2011-00880 by City Council. 4) Any modification or any intensification of the use beyond what is specifically approved by Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-00673 and the Conditions of Approval shall require review and approval by the Planning Director. Revisions to the hours of operation, request to operate an ABC license other than a Type 47, change in operation of the activities/operations as stated in this Resolution of Approval and Conditions of Approval are subject to the review and approval of the Planning Director. 5) The 5,000 square foot restaurant shall not be enlarged or intensified without Planning Director review and approval. The restaurant shall operate and be maintained in accordance with the Floor Plan as shown in the Staff Report for DRC2011-00673, Exhibit B, and as attached to this Resolution as Attachment A, and hereby referenced in the Conditions of Approval. 6) The sale and service of alcoholic beverages shall occur only when food items are served at the restaurant and shall cease when full listed menu items are not available to the customers. • 7) The serving of alcoholic beverages shall be limited to Monday through Thursday from 11:00 a.m. to 12:00 a.m.; Friday through Sunday 11:00a.m.to 1:00 a.m. Changes to the closing hours of the restaurant shall not occur prior to review and approval of the Planning Director. 8) This permit does not allow live music or staged entertainment. Entertainment activities as defined by Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Chapter 5.12 shall require the applicant to obtain a separate Entertainment Permit approval from the Planning Commission. 9) Approval of this Conditional Use Permit shall be contingent upon the applicants ability to secure approval of a Type 47 Liquor License issued by the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC)for this location. 10) The restaurant shall adhere to all food service requirements and operation regulations for a Type 47 Liquor License as prescribed by the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control(ABC). Failure to abide by all applicable ABC regulations or all Conditions of Approval shall result in Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-00673 being brought before the Planning Director for review. • Item C-29 PLANNING DIRECTOR RESTION NO. 11-18 DRC2011-00673-GHOMRI RESTAURANT GROUP, LLC September 27, 2011 Page 4 11) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any • regulations as set forth in the Uniform Building Code and/or City Ordinances or by the San Bernardino County Health Department and/or California State Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC). 12) If the approved operation of the business creates law enforcement and/or fire safety problems, such as but not limited to, loitering and disturbances, noise, overcrowding, intoxication at the premises, blocked fire exits, etc., the Conditional Use Permit shall be brought before the Planning Director for consideration of modification and/or revocation. 13) The facility shall be operated in conformance with all applicable performance standards as defined in the Development Code including, but not limited to, noise levels. 14) Any signs proposed for the restaurant shall be designed in conformance with the City's Sign Ordinance and the Uniform Sign Program for the complex and shall require review and approval by the Planning Director prior to installation. 15) The facility shall be operated in conformance with the performance standards as defined in the Industrial Area Specific Plan including,but not limited to, noise levels. If the operation of the business causes adverse effects upon adjacent businesses,the Conditional Use Permit • shall be brought before the Planning Director for consideration and possible termination of the use. 16) The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City,its agents,officers,or employees,because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City,its agents,officers,or employees, for any court costs and attorney's fees,which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may,at its sole discretion,participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve the applicant of his obligations under this condition. Building and Safetv Any alterations to the restaurant will require a building permit and the following standard conditions apply: TENANT IMPROVEMENTS STANDARD CONDITIONS NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW (S). A) General Requirements for Tenant Improvements: • Item C-30 PLANNING DIRECTOR RESCTION NO. 11-18 13 DRC2011-00673—GHOMRI RESTAURANT GROUP, LLC September 27, 2011 Page 5 • 1) Submit five complete sets of plans including (if applicable): a) Site/Plot Plan; b) Foundation Plan; C) Floor Plan; d) Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan; e) Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) Q Plumbing and Sewer Plans, g) Planning Department Project Number (i.e., DRC201 1- 00673) clearly identified on the outside of all plans. 2) Submit two sets of structural calculations and energy conservation calculations. (if applicable) 3) Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance. 4) Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the • Certificate of Occupancy issued by the Building and Safety Department. 5) Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:OOp.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. 6) Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Departments public counter). 7) Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC)for fire-resistive construction. 8) Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations and mix occupancy ratios. 9) Provide documentation and calculation for compliance with the California Energy Standard regulations. 10) Provide draft stops in combustible attics and concealed spaces, in accordance with CBC. 11) Upon tenant improvement plan check submittal, additional requirements may be needed. • Item C-31 PLANNING DIRECTOR RESTION NO. 11-18 r DRC2011-00673-GHOMRI RESTAURANT GROUP, LLC September 27, 2011 Page 6 Fire Construction Services • Fire Standard Conditions 1) Any restaurant alteration must be permitted by the Building Department. It is the responsibility of the owner to contact the health and building departments to obtain all the required permits and inspection. 2) Changes in the cook line must be submitted for review by the Fire Department. The fire suppression alterations require a permit. 3) The restaurant shall not open for business until obtaining an Assembly Use Permit from the Fire Department. 6. The Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2011. BY: Jan . Troyer, Planning Director ATTEST: 1)11'11e� ^ c -'�� • Valerie Victorino, Planning Department Secretary 1, Valerie Victorino, Secretary to the Planning Department, for the City of Rancho Cucamonga,do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced,passed,and adopted by the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Director held on the 27th day of September 2011. • Item C-32 3s • M' Q n � I MprtN ) fEN ; WS.F. DINING 1315.F/ f3p 250 S.F. CORRIDOR COR1. FSS S.F. 12.0 S.F. ELEC. SO S.F. t0 S.F 3M' STOR. DINING CORR. 3 ' 120 S.F. 70 S.F. PREP q M.I. COOLER I — eo q BAR S A WA INS DINING 3S3.S.F. n N!' • KITCHEN 1210 S.F. —'— ---� � CORR EXIT PATH'OF TRAVEL• ® n A r-- DINING i 110 S.F. I /LORR.S RECEPTION . 122 5.F. i DINING —'--� DINING 315 S.F. 320 S.F. Attachment A Item C-33 RESOLUTION NO. 13-50 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA,APPROVING ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT DRC2013-00563, A REQUEST TO PROVIDE LIVE ENTERTAINMENT COMPRISED OF KARAOKE, LIVE BANDS, AND DANCING WITHIN AN EXISTING RESTAURANT OF ABOUT 5,300 SQUARE FEET IN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK(IP) DISTRICT, INDUSTRIAL COMMERCIAL OVERLAY DISTRICT (ICOD), LOCATED AT 11849 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, UNITA;AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF—APN: 0229-012-22. A. Recitals. 1. On May 21, 1986,the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Ordinance No. 290 providing for the regulation of entertainment. 2. Steve Rawlings, on behalf of 909 Sports Bar& Grill, Inc., dba 909 Pub & Grill, filed an application for the issuance of Entertainment Permit DRC2013-00563 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution,the subject Entertainment Permit request is referred to as "the application." 3. On the 131' day of November, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. • 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on November 13, 2013 including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a tenant space located within Masi Plaza, a commercial complex of about 1,030,000 square feet(23.6 acres)that is about 1,250 feet(east to west)by about 915 feet (north to south) located at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue; and b. The complex is divided by two minor streets, Masi Drive and Sebastian Way, into two (2) parts. The larger, 15-acre part is generally rectangular in shape and is bound by Foothill Boulevard to the north and Rochester Avenue to the east, with the minor streets on the west and south, respectively; and Item C-34 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-50 ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT DRC2013-00563—STEVE RAWLINGS FOR 909 SPORTS GRILL INC. November 13, 2013 . Page 2 C. The complex is comprised of numerous buildings with a combined floor area of about 267,500 square feet. The specific location of the project site is one of the in-line tenant spaces at 11849 Foothill Boulevard, Unit A, in the largest building that is situated in the center of the complex; and d. To the north of the subject commercial/office complex is a commercial center. To the east is a legally, non-conforming residence and a commercial/office complex. To the south is the Epicenter and Adult Sports Complex operated by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. To the west there is a vacant property, an industrial building, and a restaurant; and e. The commercial/office complex is zoned Industrial Park (IP) District, Industrial Commercial Overlay District(ICOD). The properties to the west is zoned Industrial Park(IP)District while the properties to the south are zoned General Industrial (GI) District. The properties to the east are zoned Industrial Park (IP) District and General Commercial (GC) District; and f. Tropica Restaurant and Bar was granted the approval to operate under Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-00673 on September 27, 2011. The business license for that restaurant expired on November 27, 2012 and, as a result,was presumed to be closed. The tenant space was verified as vacant during an inspection by the Business License Department on April 18,2013. 909 Sports Grill, Inc. (dba 909 Pub & Grill) is currently operating a restaurant with a bar under this Conditional Use Permit. Per the Development Code, all permits and entitlements expire when a business is closed for more than one calendar year. Their business license to operate the restaurant with the barwas approved within this one-year timeframe in August 2013 following receipt • of confirmation that they will comply with the conditions of approval of the existing Conditional Use Permit and described in Resolution No. 11-18; and g. The applicant,on behalf of 909 Sports Grill, Inc.,proposes to provide entertainment consisting of large screen televisions, live music, dancing, and karaoke to complement their restaurant and bar. The televisions will be mounted throughout the dining and bar area. The live music will range from solo musicians to five-piece bands who will perform on a stage of 108 square feet near the bar area. Dancing will be in an area of about 84 square feet immediately in front of the stage—the two(2)tables located there will be moved to make room during the hours when there is entertainment. Karaoke also will be performed on this stage when there are no live music performances; and h. The floor plan that was originally approved under Conditional Use Permit DRC2011-00673 was revised to meet the current applicant's business plan but is substantially similar. The principal dining area is located near the front of the restaurant while the bar and associated seating/service areas are located in the middle of the restaurant. An office,the kitchen, and restrooms comprise the remainder of the restaurant's floor area. With the exception of the addition of the stage, the floor plan of the restaurant will not be altered by the addition of entertainment; and i. The restaurant will serve a full menu of items, i.e. the menu includes a variety of food that is typical of a full-service restaurant; and • Item C-35 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-50 • ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT DRC2013-00563—STEVE RAWLINGS FOR 909 SPORTS GRILL INC. November 13, 2013 Page 3 j. There will be eight(8)to (10)employees per shift. This number does not include the security guards; and k. The operating hours of the restaurant and bar are currently between 11:00am and 12:00 a.m. (midnight) Monday through Thursday, and between 11:00 a.m. and 1:00 a.m. Friday through Sunday. This is consistent with the hours of operation that were approved under the original Conditional Use Permit. The hours when live entertainment will be provided are proposed to be between 8:00 p.m. and 12:00 a.m. (midnight) on Thursday, between 8:00 p.m. and 1:00 a.m. Friday and Saturday, and between 11:00 a.m. and 1:00 a.m. on Sunday; and I. There will be two (2) licensed security guards on the premises when live music is performed. One of these security guards will be posted outside the restaurant to monitor activity in the parking lot and general vicinity. The applicant submitted a security plan that describes the procedures for the use of force, incident report writing, firearms/weapons, and the uniforms for security staff, door policy, and security rules. The Police Department reviewed this plan and generally accepted the procedures as submitted subject to revisions; and m. The applicant has indicated that all managers, bartenders, and servers will complete the Licensee Education on Alcohol and Drugs(LEAD) Program offered by the California Department of Alcohol Beverage Control within 30 days of being hired. • 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing, and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The conduct of the establishment and the granting of the application is consistent to the public health, safety, morals or welfare; and b. The premises or establishment is likely to be operated in an legal, proper or orderly manner; and C. Granting the application would not create a public nuisance; and d. That the normal operation of the premises would not interfere with the peace and quiet of any surrounding residential neighborhood; and e. The applicant has not made any false, misleading, or fraudulent statement of material fact in the required application. 4. The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies under as a Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 - Existing Facilities -which covers the permitting of existing structures that involve negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of the lead agency's original determination. The project is for entertainment consisting of large screen televisions, live music, dancing, and karaoke at an existing restaurant and bar; no expansion or significant change to the • Item C-36 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-50 ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT DRC2013-00563—STEVE RAWLINGS FOR 909 SPORTS GRILL, INC. November 13, 2013 Page 4 existing tenant space is proposed. Staff finds that there is no substantial evidence thatthe project will • have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staffs determination of exemption. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2,3,and 4 above,this Commission hereby approves the application, subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the standard conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference: Planning Department 1) Approval is for live entertainment comprised of karaoke,live bands and dancing within an existing restaurant of about 5,300 square feet in the Industrial Park (IP) District, Industrial Commercial Overlay District (ICOD), located at 11849 Foothill Boulevard, Unit A; APN: 0229-012- 22. 2) The modifications to the site and interior of the building shall be as shown on the plans received by the City on September 25,2013 and as shown in the Floor Plan as Exhibit D in the Staff Report for DRC2013- 00563,dated November 13,2013,and as attached to this Resolution as Attachment A, and hereby referenced in the Conditions of Approval. Any revisions shall be subject to the review and approval of the Planning Manager and/or Planning Commission. • 3) Any modification or intensification of the use such as a revision to the days and hours of entertainment,any improvements such as expansion of the stage and/or dance floor,and/or other modifications/intensification beyond what is specifically approved by this Entertainment Permit shall require the review and approval by the Planning Manager and/or Planning Commission prior to submittal of documents for plan check/occupancy, construction, commencement of the activity, and/or issuance of a Business License. 4) The days and hours of operation for the entertainment shall be limited to between 8:00 p.m. and 12:00 a.m. (midnight) on Thursday, between 8:00 p.m. and 1:00 a.m. Friday and Saturday, and between 11:00 a.m. and 1:00 a.m. on Sunday. 5) Entertainment shall be limited to karaoke, live bands, and dancing. 6) Adult entertainment, as defined in Section 17.128.020 of the Development Code, is not permitted. 7) All entertainment activity shall be conducted inside the building. 8) While entertainment is being conducted all doors and windows shall remain closed for noise attenuation purposes. • Item C-37 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-50 ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT DRC2013-00563—STEVE RAWLINGS FOR 909 SPORTS GRILL, INC. November 13, 2013 Page 5 • 9) The business operations shall be in compliance with the performance standards that are described in Section 17.66 of the Development Code, including noise limits which are described in Section 17.66.050(G). 10) The business operations shall be in compliancewith the regulations and requirements of the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control that apply to Type 47 Liquor Licenses. 1 1) Access to the lounge/entertainment area must be from the main entrance to the restaurant and not from a separate exterior entrance. Other exits shall be used for emergency purposes only. 12) If operation of this Entertainment Permit causes adverse effects upon adjacent residences, businesses,or operations including,but not limited to noise, loitering, parking, or disturbances, the Entertainment Permit shall be brought before the Planning Commission for consideration and possible suspension or revocation of the permit. 13) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances. • 14) The applicant shall submit an annual renewal statement and fee,due on or before January 1 of each and every year per Section 17.20.20(G) of the Development Code. 15) All conditions of approval for Conditional Use Permit DRC2013-00673 shall apply. 16) All signs shall comply with Chapter 17.74(Sign Regulations for Private Property) of the Development Code and Uniform Sign Program#125. 17) Applicant must use an identity card scanner (ID Scanner) anytime the premises is selling alcoholic beverages and has entertainment. (Definition of ID Scanner: An ID Scanner automates and documents the age verification process by scanning the ID through a card reader). The ID Scanner should record and timestamp the name, identification number, and date of birth on the identity card provided by patrons.This information should be recorded and maintained for a minimum of thirty (30) days. The business will provide the ID Scanner records to law enforcement upon request. 18) Any patron who (1) fights or challenges another person to fight, (2) maliciously and willfully disturbs another person by loud or unreasoned noise, or(3)uses offensive words which are inherently likely to provoke an immediate violent reaction shall be removed from the premises. • Item C-38 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-50 ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT DRC2013-00563-STEVE RAWLINGS FOR 909 SPORTS GRILL, INC. November 13, 2013 Page 6 • 19) An incident log shall be maintained at the licensed premises on a continual basis with at least one year of entries and be readily available for inspection by a police officer. The log is for recording any physical altercations, injuries, and objectionable conditions that constitute a nuisance occurring in, on, or at the licensed premises, including the immediately adjacent area that is owned, leased, or rented by the licensee. The log will indicate date, time, description of incident, and action taken. "Objectionable conditions that constitute a nuisance" means disturbance of the peace, public drunkenness,drinking in public, harassment of passersby, gambling, prostitution, loitering, public urination, lewd conduct, drug trafficking, or excessive loud noise. 20) Security guards shall maintain order and enforce the establishment's no loitering policy and shall take"reasonable steps"(as that term is defined in subparagraph (3) of Section 24200 of the California Business and Professions Code)to correct objectionable conditions that constitute a nuisance. 21) There shall be no flashing lights, disco lights, or similar lighting during the hours of entertainment that prevents the ability to clearly distinguish and identify patrons, security personnel, or other individuals in the restaurant in order to ensure the safety of patrons. Police Department • 1) A minimum of eight (8) surveillance cameras shall be installed in the premises as follows: two (2) at the bar area (one on each end); two(2) in the primary dining areas; two (2) at the VIP bottle service areas; one (1) at the front door; and one(1) at the stage. 2) The video recordings shall be of nothing less than NTSC 4SIF with a minimum of 704X480 resolution. A minimum of 30 days surveillance video shall be kept. 3) The uniform of the security guards shall have the word"Security"clearly visible on it. 4) All managers, bartenders, and servers shall complete the Licensee Education on Alcohol and Drugs (LEAD) Program offered by the California Department of Alcohol Beverage Control within 30 days of being hired. Fire District/Buildinq & Safety Department 1) Any proposed floor plan,seating,occupancy and/or furnishing changes must be submitted to Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District for review and approval. Do not increase the approved occupant load. • Item C-39 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-50 ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT DRC2013-00563—STEVE RAWLINGS FOR 909 SPORTS GRILL, INC. November 13, 2013 Page 7 • 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2013 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Frances Howdyshell, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced,passed,and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of November by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: • NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: • Item C-40 0 PROPOSED AREA OF WORK • • r"F PROPOSED AREA OF WORK �. o.• , .s ... 4. ... IWA L NVIEI15 RR RO e AIM Y FRONT J_Ll w '.moo u.: w p •' - PATIO AREA IN GOOIER O O MENS RR O RECEPTION C,. BAR II Q _ _J I _ I a_e a lww aye 0 z m� � a RI � ✓�.f WC6 K FRONT r r- l r-I I rR` BAR AREA � F PATIO AREA 2 .+ ' p LL I O VIP BOTTLE SERVICE AREA VIP BOTTLE SERVICE AREA p PATIO AREA O® ®Oo ®O� ®O .0 FIRRISSu WM P 9I J J W,- PROPOSED AREA OF WORK 00 9 ® ADA VAN .e �<-•— FLOOR PLAN m ACCESSIBLE m I y PARKING PARTITION PLAN LEGEND DOOR SCHEDULE FN-g • - O N (LZ o ME Mu ® ACCESSIBLE m :�: �R:.:� _ m.dRe.a O PARKING _ — .• LOW PARTITION TYPE T)'DETAIL p O m A-03 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Olin DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT#: DRC2013-00563 SUBJECT: ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT APPLICANT: STEVE RAWLINGS FOR 909 SPORTS GRILL, INC. LOCATION: 11849 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, UNIT A-APN: 0229-012-22. ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General Requirements Completion Date • 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. 13-50 or Approval Letter, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 3. The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below. The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Manager hearing. a) Notice of Exemption -$50 X • 1 Item C-42 Project No. DRC2013-00563 Completion Date B. Time Limits 1. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not _/_/_ • commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager. 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Services Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance and final acceptance granted prior to occupancy. 4. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 5. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination and in conformance with Building and Safety Services Department standards, the Municipal Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department (RCFD)Standards. D. SHOPPING CENTERS • 1. Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours. 2. The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and in no event shall trash and debris remain for more than 24 hours. 3. Signs shall be conveniently posted for "no overnight parking" and for "employee parking _ only." 4. All operations and businesses shall be conducted to comply with the following standards which shall be incorporated into the lease agreements for all tenants: a. Noise Level -All commercial activities shall not create any noise that would exceed an exterior noise level of 65 dB during the hours of 10 p.m. until 7 a.m. and 70 dB during the hours of 7 a.m. until 10 p,m. b. Loading and Unloading - No person shall cause the loading, unloading, opening, closing, or other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials, garbage cans, or other similar objects between the hours of 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. unless otherwise specified herein, in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to a residential area. 2 • Item C-43 STAFF REPORT • PLANNING DEPARTTTIENT 91 RANCHO C,UCAMONGA DATE: November 13, 2013 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Candyce Burnett, Planning Manager BY: Mike Smith, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19448 - MIG/HOGLE-IRELAND FOR GOODMAN RANCHO SPE, LLC - A review of a tentative parcel map in conjunction with a proposal to construct two (2) industrial warehouse buildings of 555,664 square feet (Building 1/Phase 1) and 1,033,565 square feet (Building 2/Phase 2) on a property comprised of three (3) parcels with a combined area of 3,255,834 square feet (74.7 acres) which is currently developed with a concrete pipe manufacturing/storage facility(operated by Ameron Intemational) in the Heavy Industrial (HI) District located at the southwest comer of Arrow Route and Etiwanda Avenue; APNs: 0229-131-04, -17, and -25. Related files: Development Review DRC2013- 00155, Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00315, and Uniform Sign Program DRC2013- 00316. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. • ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00155 - MIG/HOGLE-IRELAND FOR GOODMAN RANCHO SPE, LLC - A review of a proposal to construct two (2) industrial warehouse buildings of 555,664 square feet (Building 1/Phase 1) and 1,033,565 square feet (Building 2/Phase 2) on a property comprised of three (3) parcels with a combined area of 3,255,834 square feet (74.7 acres) which is currently developed with a concrete pipe manufacturing/storage facility (operated by Ameron International) in the Heavy Industrial (HI) District located at the southwest comer of Arrow Route and Etiwanda Avenue; APNs: 0229-131-04, -17, and -25. Related files: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19448, Tree Removal Permit DRC2013- 00315, and Uniform Sign Program DRC2013-00316. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2013-00315 - MIG/HOGLE-IRELAND FOR GOODMAN RANCHO SPE, LLC - A request to remove trees in conjunction with a proposal to construct two (2) industrial warehouse buildings of 555,664 square feet (Building 1/Phase 1) and 1,033,565 square feet (Building 2/Phase 2) on a property comprised of three (3) parcels with a combined area of 3,255,834 square feet (74.7 acres) which is currently developed with a concrete pipe manufacturing/storage facility (operated by Ameron International) in the Heavy Industrial (HI) District located at the southwest comer of Arrow Route and Etiwanda Avenue; APNs: 0229-131-04, -17, and -25. Related files: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19448, Development Review DRC2013- 00155, and Uniform Sign Program DRC2013-00316. • UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM DRC2013-00316 - MIG/HOGLE-IRELAND FOR GOODMAN RANCHO SPE, LLC - A request to establish a Uniform Sign Program in conjunction with a proposal to construct two (2) industrial warehouse buildings of D,E,F,G-1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM19448, DRC2013-00155, DRC2013-00315, ORC2013-00316 - MIG/HOGLE-IRELAND FOR GOODMAN RANCHO SPE, LLC November 13, 2013 • Page 2 555,664 square feet (Building 1/Phase 1) and 1,033,565 square feet (Building 2/Phase 2) on a property comprised of three (3) parcels with a combined area of 3,255,834 square feet (74.7 acres) which is currently developed with a concrete pipe manufacturing/storage facility (operated by Ameron International) in the Heavy Industrial (HI) District located at the southwest corner of Arrow Route and Etiwanda Avenue; APNs: 0229-131-04, -17, and -25. Related files: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19448, Development Review DRC2013-00155, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00315. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19448, Development Review DRC2013-00155, Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00315, and Uniform Sign Program DRC2013-00316 by adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval with conditions. BACKGROUND: These applications were originally scheduled for review and action by the Planning Commission on October 23, 2013. However, there was a technical error in the public notification process. The number of posted notices on the subject property was not in compliance with Section 17.14.050(8)(4) of the Development Code. At the direction of the Assistant City Attorney, the public hearing was re-scheduled for the November 13, 2013 Planning Commission meeting. The public hearing for these applications was re-advertised with new mailed notices, postings, and newspaper advertising with a notification period of 10 days (Exhibit U). PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: • North - Manufacturing Facility and Metropolitan Water District(MWD)Water Storage Facility; General Industrial (GI) District South- Manufacturing Facilities; Heavy Industrial (HI) District East - Various Commercial and Industrial Businesses; General Industrial (GI) District West - Manufacturing Facilities; Heavy Industrial (HI) District B. General Plan Designations: Project Site- Heavy Industrial North - General Industrial South - Heavy Industrial East - General Industrial West - Heavy Industrial C. Site Characteristics: The project site is a property comprised of five (5) parcels with a combined area of 3,255,834 square feet (74.7 acres) located at the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Arrow Route (Exhibit B). The street frontage along Arrow Route is about 2,600 feet while the street frontage along Etiwanda Avenue is about 1,700 feet. Currently, the site is a concrete pipe manufacturing/storage facility operated by Ameron International, Inc. There are several buildings (of various size and purpose), outdoor equipment, areas for parking and storage, and associated infrastructure on the site. Most of the existing buildings are located at the north side of the site near Arrow Route. The southeastern part of the site is primarily used for the storage of finished concrete pipes. Paving on the site is generally limited to the parking areas and the associated access driveways. • D,E,F,G-2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM19448, DRC2013-00155, DRC2013-00315, DRC2013-00316 - MIG/HOGLE-IRELAND FOR GOODMAN RANCHO SPE, LLC • November 13, 2013 Page 3 To the west and south are manufacturing facilities operated by Tree Island Wire, Inc. and Gerdau, respectively. To the north, across Arrow Route, are a chemical manufacturing facility operated by Air Liquide and a water storage facility operated by the Metropolitan Water District(MWD). To the east, across Etiwanda Avenue, are several small commercial (e.g. ARCO and Tole-House Caf6) and industrial businesses. The Victoria Woods apartment complex is located northeast of the site at the northeast corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Arrow Route. Primary access is currently via a private, north-south driveway along the west perimeter of the project site. This private driveway is shared with Tree Island Wire, Inc. and Gerdau. The subject property and the properties to the west and south are zoned Heavy Industrial (HI) District while the properties to the east and north are zoned General Industrial (GI) District. The property at the northeast corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Arrow Route is zoned Medium (M) Residential, Etiwanda Specific Plan (South Overlay). Landscaping on-site is limited to numerous trees (of various species) and small shrubs along Arrow Route and along the aforementioned private driveway. An additional north-south row of trees is located parallel to (and about 300 feet west of) Etiwanda Avenue. The site is generally level with an elevation of about 1,160 feet and 1,125 feet at the northwest and southeast comers, respectively, of the site. ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant, on behalf of Goodman Rancho SPE, LLC, proposes to redevelop the site in two (2) phases by constructing two (2) industrial warehouse buildings of 555,664 square • feet (Building 1/Phase 1) and 1,033,565 square feet (Building 2/Phase 2) with a combined floor area of 1,589,229 square feet (Exhibit E). No tenants have been specified at this time. The basic layout of each building will be typical for warehouse buildings. The primary (or long) axis of Building 1 will be aligned east-west and the primary axis of Building 2 will be aligned north- south. There will be three (3) potential office areas in each building. These potential offices are located at the northwest, northeast, and southwest corners of Building 1, and at the northwest, northeast, and southeast corners of Building 2 (Exhibit F and G). Outdoor employee eating areas with overhead shade structures will be provided at each office area (Exhibit L). The proposed buildings will be of concrete tilt-up construction and will be painted with a palette of four (4) colors. The boldest of the three colors will be "The Goodman Green" which is the applicant's custom corporate color. This color will be utilized primarily on the wall planes at the office areas of the building and at intervals along the north and south elevations of Building 1 and east and west elevations of Building 2. An additional primary material will be sandblasted concrete. Sandblasted concrete will appear as sets of three horizontal bands. Each band will have a vertical dimension of(2) feet. These bands will be applied at various locations along all elevations of each building. Glass panels will serve as a secondary material. These glass panels will be extensively used at the office areas. At the primary entrance to each office there will be a combination of spandrel and vision glass that will be applied to the full height of the wall plane with only metal canopies visually interrupting the glass facade. Glass panels are also proposed at various locations along all elevations of each building. Wall articulation will be most significant at the office comers of the building. On the east and west elevations of Building 1 and the north and south elevations of Building 2, there will be insets, five (5) feet in width and two (2) feet in depth, at regular intervals between the offices areas that will interrupt the • relatively flat wall planes of these elevations. The top of the parapets will be articulated, as well, at the office areas, at regular intervals where the insets are located, and at various locations where the wall planes have been embellished with glass and/or sandblasted bands (Exhibit 1). D,E,F,G-3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM19448, DRC2013-00155, DRC2013-00315, DRC2013-00316 - MIG/HOGLE-IRELAND FOR GOODMAN RANCHO SPE, LLC • November 13, 2013 Page 4 The dock loading areas for Building 1 will be located on the south and north sides of the building. The dock loading areas for Building 2 will be located on the west and east sides of the building. Of note is that the north dock loading area and associated trailer parking for Building 1 and the east dock loading area and associated trailer parking of Building 2 will be located adjacent to, and therefore 'facing', Arrow Route and Etiwanda Avenue, respectively. Although the orientation of the dock areas is towards streets and, therefore, public view, is generally not preferred, the dock areas for this project will be screened by walls constructed of concrete tilt-up panels and, at the entrances to the dock areas, 8-foot high metal sliding gates. These walls will be a minimum of 8 feet in height. The top edge of the screen walls will be articulated to reflect the articulation of the parapets on the buildings. The walls also will be painted and finished to match the color and materials theme of the buildings (Exhibit J and K). In some areas along Arrow Route the finished surface elevation of the dock area at Building 1 will be up to 6 feet below the finished surface elevation of the street. Visibility of the dock areas will be further reduced as each dock area will be a minimum of 45 feet from the respective streets they adjoin (measured from the curb). The buildings and corresponding dock doors will be setback about 235 feet from the respective streets they face (measured from the curb). Parking for employees and visitors will be arranged near the office areas. Five (5) points of direct access from the public right-of-way will be provided to the project site: three (3) driveways along Arrow Route and two (2) driveways along Etiwanda Avenue. An additional two (2) points • of access will be provided via the aforementioned private driveway along the west side of the site. The required landscape coverage within the Heavy Industrial (HI) District is 5 percent of the project site area (the minimum is 10 percent within 1,000 feet of Arrow Route). The project will have a landscape coverage of 10 percent within 1,000 feet of Arrow Route and a landscape coverage 17.9 percent on the remainder of the site. The overall landscape coverage will be 12.31 percent. Between the wall and Arrow Route there will be landscaping comprised of ground cover, shrubs, and trees. Landscaping between the wall and Etiwanda Avenue will be similar. However, the landscaping along Etiwanda Avenue will be limited to shrubs and ground cover due to an existing Metropolitan Water District (MWD) pipeline and easement. The MWD's technical/maintenance requirements and easement restrictions prohibit the planting of trees, including street trees, along Etiwanda Avenue. At the southwest comer of the intersection .of Arrow Route and Etiwanda Avenue the applicant will provide enhanced landscaping (Exhibit M). A bus shelter will be provided on Etiwanda Avenue about 300 feet south of this intersection. The proposal includes the reconstruction/reconfiguration of the intersection of Arrow Route, the aforementioned private driveway, and (future) Yellow Wood Court at the northwest corner of the project site. Additional improvements at this intersection include the installation of traffic signals. These improvements will be generally consistent with previously reviewed conceptual plans for this intersection that were proposed with development projects at the northwest and northeast corners of this intersection (Development Review DRC2007-00440 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00664 — Omnitrans, and Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00632 — Air Liquide, • respectively) and were reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission in October 2009. D,E,F,G-4 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM19448, DRC2013-00155, DRC2013-00315, DRC2013-00316 - MIG/HOGLE-IRELAND FOR GOODMAN RANCHO SPE, LLC • November 13, 2013 Page 5 The proposal also includes the reconstruction/reconfiguration of the intersection of Etiwanda Avenue and Whittram Avenue at the southeast corner of the project site. The installation of traffic signals at this intersection are also included. Consistent with the City's General Plan, a, future overpass for Etiwanda Avenue, to be constructed by the City, is proposed at the existing railroad tracks that are located about 460 feet south of the site. The applicant has been coordinating with the City's Engineering Department in order to minimize any conflicts between the improvements associated with this project and improvements associated with the overpass. As the reconstruction/reconfiguration of this intersection will affect neighboring properties at the northeast.(APN: 0229-161-03) and southeast (APN: 0229-162-14) corners of this intersection, the applicant has been in contact with the owners/tenants of those properties and informed them accordingly (Exhibit P). An easement for a potential drive aisle that will link the adjacent property to the south (APN: 0229-131-16) with Etiwanda Avenue will be provided at the southeast comer of the site. B. Floor Area Analysis: Per Chapter 2, Figure LU-2 Land Use Plan of the General Plan, the maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) in the Heavy Industrial (HI) land use category is 50 percent. Following the completion of the buildings, the total building floor area will be 555,664 square feet (Building 1) and 1,033,565 square feet (Building 2) with a combined floor area of 1,589,229 square feet. The calculated FAR will be 46.8 percent (Building 1) and 50 percent (Building 2) with a combined FAR of 48.4 percent. • C. Parkins Calculations: Per Table 17.64.050-1 of the Development Code, the parking calculations for the proposed project, based on the proposed mix of office and warehouse floor areas in each building, are as follows: Floor Area Number of Spaces Number of Spaces Type of Use SF Parking Ratio Required Provided Building 1 Parcel 1 Warehouse 545,664 varies' 157 Office 10,000 1/250 40 Total 555,664 197 198 Building 2 Parcel 2 Warehouse 1,023,565 varies' 276 Office 10,000 1/250 40 Total 1,033,565 316 320 Total Re uired5132 Total Provided 5182 'For warehouse uses, the parking calculations are 1 space per 1,000 square feet for the first 20,000 square feet; 1 space per 2,000 square feet for the second 20,000 square feet; and 1 space per 4,000 • square feet for additional floor area in excess of the first 40,000 square feet. 2The trailer parking requirement is calculated separately from the 'standard' parking requirement and is based on a ratio of one stall per dock door. The number of trailer parking spaces that is required D,E,F,G-5 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM19448, DRC2013-00155, DRC2013-00315, DRC2013-00316 - MIG/HOGLE-IRELAND FOR GOODMAN RANCHO SPE, LLC • November 13, 2013 Page 6 for the overall project is 297 parking spaces (130 spaces for Building 1 and 167 spaces for Building 2); the number of trailer parking spaces that will be provided for the overall project is 397 parking spaces (130 spaces for Building 1 and 267 spaces for Building 2). D. Tentative Parcel Mao SUBTPM19448: The proposal includes a tentative parcel map to consolidate the five (5) existing parcels that comprise the project site into two (2) parcels of 1,187,270 square feet (27.3 acres, Parcel 1) and 2,068,564 square feet (47.5 acres, Parcel 2). The new parcels will correspond with the location of each building and their respective, associated improvements (Exhibit C). Each parcel will comply with the required minimum parcel size of 5 acres for projects in this development district. As a part of this tentative parcel map process, the applicant will revise the various easements that affect the project site in order to make them consistent with current technical and legal standards/requirements. The applicant has coordinated with the entities that have an interest in these easements to ensure that they will accept the revisions to the easements and the physical improvements that will occur as a result of this project. For example, Tree Island Wire, Inc. and Gerdau share access through, and have easements within, the private driveway along the west side of the project site. Staff has received signed documents from representatives of both Tree Island Wire, Inc. and Gerdau indicating acceptance of the project as it applies to them (Exhibit O). E. Land Use Compatibility: The project will be consistent with the site's development district and the surrounding land uses. The most sensitive land use adjoining the project site is the • aforementioned apartment complex located to the northeast of the project site. The most significant impacts will be noise caused by on-site activities and traffic, and glare from on-site lighting. The anticipated land use associated with this project is logistics (warehouse, storage, and distribution). Most of the activities associated with logistics are conducted indoors. Although truck loading and unloading will occur outdoors in the dock areas, the impact of this outdoor activity will be limited. Because of the location of the buildings on the site and overall site layout, the buildings themselves will partly buffer the apartment complex from noise and glare. Impacts will be further mitigated by the presence of screen walls that enclose the dock areas along Etiwanda Avenue and Arrow Route. Traffic will be most significant at the intersection of the private driveway and Arrow Route according to the Noise Assessment prepared by Mestre Greve Associates on February 15, 2013 — this intersection is located about 2,700 feet west of the perimeter of the apartment complex. Manufacturing, or similarly intense uses, if proposed, would be required to be conducted indoors. If an applicant proposes outdoor operations, the City will review such uses and conduct a thorough analysis to establish additional mitigations, if necessary, to ensure compatibility with the surrounding area and land uses. F. Grading and Technical Review Committees: The Grading Review Committee (Addington and Miller) and Technical Review Committee reviewed the proposal on September 17, 2013. The Committees accepted the proposal and recommend approval. The Committees' conditions have been incorporated into the Resolutions of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19448 and Development Review DRC2013-00155. G. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee (Fletcher, Oaxaca, and Granger) • reviewed the proposal on September 17, 2013 (Exhibit Q). The Committee reviewed the architecture of the buildings, building plotting, site layout, and the design of the open space, D,E,F,G-6 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM19448, DRC2013-00155, DRC2013-00315, DRC2013-00316 - MIG/HOGLE-IRELAND FOR GOODMAN RANCHO SPE, LLC • November 13, 2013 Page 7 landscaping, and uniform sign program (the sign program is discussed further below). The Committee accepted the proposal as submitted and recommend approval. The Committee's conditions have been incorporated into the Resolutions of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19448 and Development Review DRC2013-00155. H. Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00315: The applicant submitted a Tree Removal Permit to allow the removal of the trees that are located at various locations within and along the perimeter of the site. The applicant submitted an Arborist Report, prepared by Earthwise Arborists on April 23, 2013, that included description and health of the individual trees, their overall health and condition, and viability of relocation (Exhibit R). The report stated that due to the location and/or health of the trees, none were suitable for relocation or protection in-place and recommended removal of the trees. The proposed project includes the planting of new trees along the perimeter of the project site and in the parking areas of each building. I. Uniform Sign Program DRC2013-00316: The applicant submitted a draft Uniform Sign Program that will regulate the technical characteristics of the building and monument signs. (Exhibit S). This sign program was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (Fletcher, Oaxaca, and Granger) on September 17, 2013 (Exhibit Q). The applicant proposes a sign program comprised of a combination of monument and wall signs for the building addresses of each tenant space, tenant identification, and corporate ownership/management of the project site. These signs are typical for industrial warehouse buildings. The potential size, location, and • placement of the signs will be integrated and compatible with the architecture of the buildings and the site. The Committee accepted the Uniform Sign Program as proposed subject to technical corrections relating to the height and area of the monument signs. Of note is a proposed monument sign that was to be located at the southwest corner of the intersection of Arrow Route and Etiwanda Avenue. This sign did not comply with the Development Code as it exceeded the maximum allowable height and area for monument signs. In response, the applicant proposed modifying it by separating it into two components. The first component would be a 21-foot high concrete pillar/column designed in a manner that is more aesthetic in nature, i.e. an art installation. It would have no text or logos on it. The second component would be a standard monument sign that fully complies with the City's design and technical standards/guidelines. Staff added that the art installation and the monument sign would be physically separated by 20 to 30 feet so that the separate purpose of each feature would be obvious and distinct. The Committee accepted this concept and agreed to allow the applicant to develop the design of the art installation in coordination with staff. The attached exhibit of this installation is only conceptual as its design has not been finalized (Exhibit T). J. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. • Staff received written comments from three (3) agencies. Based on discussions with the applicant's consultant, MIG/Hogle-Ireland and City Staff, special conditions of approval have D,E,F,G-7 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM19448, DRC2013-00155, DRC2013-00315, DRC2013-00316 - MIG/HOGLE-IRELAND FOR GOODMAN RANCHO SPE, LLC • November 13, 2013 Page 8 been added to the Resolution of Approval that address the comments raised by these agencies. Staff believes that with these special conditions, additional mitigations are not necessary and that the project would have no significant effect on the environment. The comments and responses are further described below. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. No correspondence has been received in response to these notices. As noted above, Staff received written comments in response to the public notice of intent to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration from three (3) agencies: the Native American Heritage Commission, City of Ontario, and San Bernardino County Department of Public Works (Exhibit W). 1. The Native American Heritage Commission — Comment regarding Archaeological [Cultural] Resources: this agency stated that mitigations should be provided to address impacts to archaeological resources. Staff Response: The site is fully developed with a concrete pipe manufacturing/storage facility comprised of several buildings (of various size and purpose), outdoor equipment, areas for parking and storage, and associated infrastructure. A standard mitigation is already provided in the Initial Study Parts II and III that addresses the potential discovery of archaeological resources, and discusses the steps that must be completed by the applicant in the event of a discovery. This • mitigation is included in the Resolution of Approval (Environmental Mitigations, Cultural Resources, Mitigation #1). Therefore, no additional mitigations for archaeological [cultural] resources are necessary. 2. City of Ontario — Comment regarding Hydrology and Water Quality: this agency stated that until the ultimate storm drain system downstream of the site is constructed, the subject project must detain the Q-100 flow onsite such that the post condition flow is less than the existing condition flow. Staff Response: Special conditions of approval are included that requires the applicant to install storm drain improvements in Etiwanda Avenue from Arrow Route to 6th Street during the first phase of development. These mitigations are included in the Resolution of Approval (Engineering Special Conditions #13 and 18). Therefore, no additional mitigations for hydrology and water quality are necessary. 3. City of Ontario and San Bernardino County Department of Public Works — Comment regarding Transportation/Traffic: these agencies stated that the Initial Study Parts II and III a)did not include an analysis of several specific intersections (in 2035); b) had incomplete/inaccurate analyses of some intersections; and c) did not include a warehouse in the City of Ontario that is currently under construction. Staff Response: The applicant's traffic consultant, Kunzman Associates, Inc., provided a Supplemental Traffic Analysis prepared on November 4, 2013. The analysis determined that (in 2035), with the exception of two (2) street intersections — Etiwanda Avenue and 4th Street, and • Etiwanda Avenue and Napa Street—all intersections cited in the response letters would operate at acceptable levels of service (LOS) consistent with the General Plans of both Rancho Cucamonga and Ontario. Therefore, there would be no impact to those intersections. For the intersections D,E,F,G-8 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM19448, DRC2013-00155, DRC2013-00315, DRC2013-00316 - MIG/HOGLE-IRELAND FOR GOODMAN RANCHO SPE, LLC • November 13, 2013 Page 9 that would not operate at acceptable levels of service (LOS), the traffic consultant identified street improvements (street widening and lane striping)that would be necessary to address the impacts. The applicant's traffic consultant recommends that the applicant be required to pay a fair share of the costs for these street improvements to ensure that each intersection operates at an acceptable Level of Service in 2035. Staff has incorporated into the Resolution of Approval the following special condition: Prior to issuance of construction permits, the applicant shall coordinate with the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the City of Ontario the fees and method of payment for constructing the street improvements identified in the Supplemental Traffic Analysis prepared by Kunzman Associates, Inc. on November 4, 2013 to ensure that the street intersections of Etiwanda Avenue and 4th Street, and Etiwanda Avenue and Napa Street, operate at levels of service (LOS) consistent with the General Plans of both the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the City of Ontario. 4. San Bernardino County Department of Public Works — Comment regarding Biological Resources: this agency stated that the Initial Study does not address impacts to nesting birds that would be protected by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918 and California Department of Fish and Game Code 3513. Staff Response: According to the General Plan Figure RC-4, and Section 4.4 of the General Plan FPEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources. Therefore, development • will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals. Although the existing vegetation on site is of low quality, the project site may still support nesting of some native bird species. Generally, all birds (as listed) are protected under the Federal Migratory Bird Treaty of 1918 and/or California Fish and Game Code Sections 3503,3503.5, and 3513. The applicant's consultant states that based on the project construction schedule, removal of landscaping will occur in January 2014 and, therefore, will not occur during the avian breeding season (generally February through September). The applicant's consultant acknowledges that if demolition occurs during the avian breeding season due to construction delays, the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) recommends that nest surveys be conducted and active nests avoided and provided with a minimum buffer as determined by a biological monitor in order to be compliant with Federal and/or State law. Staff has incorporated into the Resolution of Approval the following special condition: if vegetation removal, soil disturbance, or any other construction related activity is to occur during the avian nesting season (February 1 through August 31), a preconstruction nesting survey shall be conducted prior to initiation of construction. If nests are discovered, they should be avoided through establishment of an appropriate buffer setback, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist and consistent with CDFW protocols. The temporary "no construction"area would have to be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and left the nest, then construction in the area could resume. if initial ground disturbing activities or site clearing is proposed to occur outside of the nesting season (September 1 through January 31), then a preconstruction survey would not be required and construction could commence unimpeded. SUMMARY: The proposed project is to construct two (2) industrial warehouse buildings with a • combined floor area of 1,589,229 square feet. The proposal will be in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the D,E,F,G-9 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM19448, DRC2013-00155, DRC2013-00315, DRC2013-00316 - MIG/HOGLE-IRELAND FOR GOODMAN RANCHO SPE, LLC • November 13, 2013 Page 10 potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. During public comment period for the Mitigated Negative Declaration, staff received comments from several agencies. In response, special conditions of approval have been added to the Resolution of Approval that address the comments raised by these agencies. Staff believes that with these special conditions the project will have no significant effect on the environment. Respectfully submitted, r Candyce eft Planning Manager CB:MS/Is Attachments: Exhibit A - Location Map Exhibit B - Aerial Photo/Site Utilization Map Exhibit C - Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19448 • Exhibit D - Conceptual Grading Plan and Sections Exhibit E - Overall Site Plan Exhibit F - Site Plan and Detail Site of Office Comers Exhibit G - Floor Plans Exhibit H - Roof Plans Exhibit I - Building Elevations Exhibit J - Screen Wall Elevations Exhibit K - Combined Building and Screen Wall Elevations Exhibit L - Trash Enclosure and Pump House Details (typical) Exhibit M - Landscape Plans Exhibit N - Photometric Plans Exhibit O - Correspondence from Tree Island Wire and Gerdau Exhibit P - Summary of Meetings and Correspondence with Property Owners Exhibit Q - Design Review Committee Action Comments (September 17, 2013) Exhibit R - Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00315 (Description of Trees and Site Plan) Exhibit S - Uniform Sign Program DRC2013-00316 Exhibit T - Art Installation (not finalized) Exhibit U - Planning Commission Staff Report(October 23, 2013) Exhibit V - Initial Study Parts 1, 2 and 3 Exhibit W - Comments in Response to the draft Mitigated Negative Declaration Exhibit X - Supplemental Traffic Excerpt provided by Kunzman Associates, Inc (November 4, 2013) Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19448 • Draft Resolution of Approval for Development Review DRC2013-00155 Draft Resolution of Approval for Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00315 Draft Resolution of Approval for Uniform Sign Program DRC2013-00316 D.E.F.G-10 PIC) A° J na0% I JAY 15(' 5 i • 4,$� 'AI1 [eera�vAteW. .pt 1 __lvnil>F -,a `l N 1 n. .I r •• �G ,` I � U 9� J � _ 1 00 I \.a, Gpuy�v��* /g i6�jFa�+mp •< , uAvo_' �� � �. 9 _ �� >- n 3AMN3MIlll N.wa yy �hwm+ 9* .1 C pq MmONmSiOON Jim PRiSBURGHAyE_j� I ' Am ) 13HIlll zox33� a bay euEEuoAve" It a i" �evR rfl6�xs9a 6L ` 1 -� iall rip!]x�� n JII L a=gL R WOCu x .AE •� I I - SIN —�JlYssue_ue_ .��L_ AqY fA _J� 9 L5Id9 Y � o rwumtX•6ermX. Q- - qq S k �. E Xaa J.ln m fll FlKXN6FR $ty if H. i T GAXiAAHIIAAYE BAf �a?55d .°�- r% 4011 � JX,�c !� A -- -_ _- -- 9a cmc( -nit / -DAY--- In D dr, � �uxEeERRVGR �`�.. y I:.,�t, uanlwXAve. iA : EN �--�gL wnulsll �g9' :V r �r P 691 oar a JLYIl � E " 1� .�- JL_ OAY_:: my 9 • ' e VI _. I _ ... 't�'{y •°AAtt`vwa'��'S Glia r19-;ix_�i_ -w<iw6u<r9$vlsn�7�l �1�� ��vPv 1°{r�-1"�wn� s%��_ut �FF�m2 w'. F " Lxr1 5 �L 9 Rma ,a mow•>t n l �'��b'S'V'9 �.v'�{` y ^'°m°n a yg, d _nma AnSAb _ s rv.en� A E dMlnnn.nn -,w---\ 'f�uaoolNu �.� � �rtf��n6R i � �I• Xtiu'�iNO.k�mn�i � p�� � �� �� �9�� � 9" ETIWANDA AVE um w a nr II' Ig P � ETIWANDA If $ 9 >m 4—, �r II afw pXMXYF XrN'- yyfi77 yL n lN� ,ArrL l.i el 5 .I �n i '� r �`19 o' II fvaAR—_— ied .��_ 1 �$ $ R£AL ncwht2 a pi $ °n�d9 :hrnre�doe� D a p ; _ D v a wtin . .... -- HICxORYAVE 9.3�103KX�1 $�iwwlHUTn {kn°.mn wrnsrn II �,� " ruao� gg JL.-EAUAVYi, � '� EASIA 17 9r- I1t i'3 s o a � T �9 o Mis C�a'.'�i'�t�°% t a'>•• r r;• +. '3�; {"+. � rd Vit, r � '�'+i r �.p � }�h�'�,g�r �' ww,++ �: � �s ::�• f �-`.rM JF�dr'��,•,_,fi,.,� js+t.uJ`� �,�,.:v{� 43" ^i't i'�'A. �'� V ekY • 3' � ii'' + � W { '� + #a�.b'N }-*** t +�k''�R��S?� �. 2£.ti' dao- + i �iN�f i'� y��� W»�th��, 'rr,.�"+"7 } .�,>k4�ro✓ �� €� rx"'» >x*c`_"• ®i e N • it y • aS � � 711 fh .� • 5qg 3,- t",ytypyy'°a ,",:ark . +�.�ph�� '#" •(��s..,: � ��r �'s f'r`re•-T. F' � 'lr `� .x;}��'"sw�ar. S� • l to • • I �� s�1e�1 f! 'lye Y M �� 11� ��v,,,• � � �Y �5" ' �" 5 �� 9v�"'E` �� a��x �._� �'t1Tt, i'� � ',�>is� 'z"_ `ys,��, �� .y�'� a ��. "� ''�" �, yam""' fix, a3:r•. � r .. „�'� "p}'� rh . r;. T'A e S vttac'•�'_ 3"smY.' t r ^7.{, +fit r��r t ;i #f n E' ��1!'IM • �y ,+x ���xE p`"S� # ,� g wi'h �Sd #.J.yz• � ! Yy�'� � i .h �L.�'. SY"'P�#` '• � "% pfd St y � 1,�.. A .�' ' f --.� Y`r �': �'. �. ,I .. I ��' f�'r.'y� ;' �tt"SyC� � waii 1�`�'�, �ur'�.L��'yt^� r• r �' ��,. '`� '�«�t 6 � �. a. t ^• �� I'. � srr'a� a�, x by '� ^ r�.3�-c•� .� >..:,,kr`.i•R fW F ( Aa �4r L.r 4 t� ..:. t'.+�" 7.9�-�,.Ta'*• ,�. �� r'. �k. �1L ';u�F{Y� � �y� i f� � I y• � ri ��HY�` �T�11$ R �^ � i ?"y'.Ayy-} t C' � �p � ."� x -• �. � e � �f �' � `4��CVy ♦ » ,� r � � t � 3 ,p ,� �� r t i' 'r�r �s V _r- 'y:.`�y �-i�1�`ter• "S�'�`< � � 'M'',; t�'"' `., { ^M- _ ��-Y'$.„� � , ��,�v„g.�.. .`�19,; = E _ #t. w��sp�'•k �,1 �j �n' sv .C'� �S�i�� �. }. ""° ., 1 i �, r"Ly� .� tt���•'� � �: ""-cTkl�..-� �rr i s •� .�, � �"'%S�i`��_ `3�Jf 3r�st t�d�) �Z i !.� S. ril! } �. .� y r+i�i1'^�.�u.. -x-r arr„�•,x,..art-re•'as a... �e•r�- '+r• , ,r -r*v+c.rt�.^rFer.:a-^r^�.c�R4}.a �MT»r.Y 10 Ul Fit u 77.r. .`_...��„"• vS"'_'"'_' ., 3. 'a."""_'•'"..�i.,'�' r .. ... Rey XS,„ 1��� ,� 1 r<*r � �`.�,ey�,� '• � � vn�.tfki..�`.".J�*'�.+rxrr� r.� �� ' � .� :r+.� ..r 1 > E NiT: _ _ a LEGAL DESCRIP.Tm10N w..e..me.e.w.nru«m _ . ------- - �` TENTATIVE PARCEL ..a s a...�_r._.n_ _.n..... MAP NO. 19448 77. BENCHMARK BASIS OF BENUNGS RECORD DATA REFERENCES PROJECT LOCATION .x rnum�... _.e. ....e e_au� m �•�e..e.+... PROJECTINFORA. TION L.a ....._.n.....«..�._....._..._... n. aw., wa.u.«n..r.m..m n.a u.....m.r a _.........._.._.......__.__ �. LEGEND: ..a....m• vu r._.n an._.m..mcer« �_ .w> �...._. LOTSUMMAAY NOTES... p:,.. _,_�........�.�.._..-._.. O�� BOUNDARY MAP TOPOGRAPHY NOTE FLOOD NOTE W m ...... —T—AA1 COMBINATION FACTOR AP.N. e_— _0_.•..a.®.._ ._._._ ,I € am. O ♦ �C «w�. p.O.�.iL C, u..a....w....e.aev...u.e OWNERIBUBDNIOERa._n. .•..._...w..n_. —�n...._.._.._...n.a......m T ; «�� _ n _ _ :,r��ir'Fau.�. 3! ;�'_...'°..�.vn���a OYMERSHIP STATEMENT All wr._w wu. w �{xn ♦rnw, mn.....omr m.v...n i^I ::..:-. ..e........,.�. ... ... O~m __ ..�I tip•"'® ........—.....® L__j w_IM r� a.m.�^—.�wr� 'o+w. PREPARED BY Jµ ^...._......_...m..•..�_�•e� li "' ' 4' uuA p` 1BifA71VE PAFICEi � MW NO.WA t1. r9I1®R FM4 --- LEGEND: ROUTS 1 .1.. T- it VOR. LOT 1 _ I ems• �� 1 I I IIA T .--: "TRACT NO. 5377if d PARCEL] ' I A ' _ . .. I , . . I . . II _ � i ZI I 1 sziso r 4 It PARCEL C oil 11 L TWATM PARC& 77. WNQ SM --- LEGEND: • ARROW RMttG f:77 ----------- -------------- PARCEL 2 ,C) Un W0 W EAST 25 AC. OF THE NORTH SO AC. 2 THE eEf. BEG 8. TIS'now, 8mm t 7 ON I PARCEL 4 L SEE SHEET 4 OF 4 TWATW PAFM W ND.SM FUSCOE 3�4_ SEE SHEET 3 OF 4 LEGEND: Qf .�.� W ,• i1 PARCEL 'B' R .._< P .... Iz rigPARCELa 0 66 Pr4P 38 t , ' e s LpL NO 438 FOR LLA V "' 'WRT. NO 19990386326 MR. l _ i I a jj 14 '. - • PARCEL 3 • .. _ - INDEX IMP tai � \I - � "vminruu _ I ` •I AVENUE - I _ TENTATIVE PARCEL WP N0.A/18 -- CONCEPTUAL GRADING AND UTILITY PLAN TPM NO. 19448 GOODMAN LOGISTICS CENTER, RANCHO CUCAMONGA W ARROW ROUTE AND ETIWANDA AVENUE SITE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA I...I .. .� `32 ..... ,� .... ......r............................. IT �1 TIT TIL:z. 'SHEET 4SHEET 2 SHEET 3 ....... w y/.. a. � - UTILITY PROVIDERS L ____ ___ �I �OEET15 L' ] • LOT SUNWRYp�c��,ry 0 -gym ua L_ 'I t f BENCNpN1ARN" o u.. I AP.N. RECORD BOUNDARY NOTE: UTILITY NOTE: ..wi...e WDID , ENGINEER: OT : su i FUSCOE _ KNRwNCNO SPE LLC ' 5nr�wwu,vc.sw.i�Im k Y...m _ vx2 E m W1LA1] ARROW .mn, I 1 I 1 ,I I 1 T II pF� Iw T Iw S i \'— I BUILDING 1 w i, r . , 555;664 S.F. I ' 1 Nlli lt� N .. 1 1 1 1 _ T 1 7 Is r mc-.� �N� I - - CONCEPTUAL GRADING&STORM DRAIN PLAN ENGINEEq: OWNER: WEI: ~ FUSCOE w°°D�+R CHO SCE,uC 2 ume,i 12 cwrt.c.: wum wcc 0 • W N13 1 _ r .y .... .... I I r 1 _ m wl BUILDING 1j 555,864 SF.5 I ' I x � I CONCEPTUAL GRADING&STORM DRAIN PLAN ENGINEER: OWNElL Sllg/,� N GOOGN/:N RMICNG SPE LLC FUSCOE - u�. .E.a. ,,, 3 �Ek o �- - - -- Ll I " ' I ! 1 C,Lig: I N � O � Ll I BUILDING 2 1.033.565 S.F. - I # � r I { • 1$kq I I . ; ------- o� m SEE SHEET 5 CONCEPTUAL GRADING&STORM DRAIN PLAN ENGNEER PLANER SIHl. ~ IFUSCOE �omw Ha�r]cra .uc 4 _ IFL�YSY�31e •"[. N 12 • • m 0 0 0 _ SEE SHEET 4 I i '�• A (� V /—T--,------ �?777---- .r I it \ TE?1 III — 1*i I11 ill I: h i BUILDING 2 i , IIII Ifl 1;033'565S,F t .. _ -i II I _ ' i , III 1 I f,:� I I I 0 ... r , I Iii All� 1 iH I 'V I ---------------------------------------------- mr I o y II �•h � Ifl I `"""' 1 CONCEPTUAL GRADING 8 STORM DRAIN PLAN ENGWEER: OWNER: 5114T. ~ fFUSCOE C) :°°°""'N NFN°"o .um Jr u 4"H 12 Cp1i,Ll: WIM OYIl/A1) wIN.mrz _ ___ =L I �I -- a . . - --- - _lt I SECTION AA t L . _ _ SECLigN Bd --EE Olvev u. -- ------------------ --- ----I- ------- - -- vl-- � q SECTI C.0 v �`~ MM IIIINW A'h �.... _ - � SECTION 60 _ I I _ - - I iYL7 I Dov I II wl � rt6 1 SECTIONE-E .Ilr �.e.,.— ,.. --------- --------------------------- - ------------------- SECT Ff . 1 'a-h'.SN.K•3.EI..tL 5'NA'S.Y$d.S='�9C�ra ... .w ___-. . __—tee+-._ .i SECTI " oxcm�am�a v � .e vervu�Mu m .. SITE SECTIONS ENG WEER LOMM &(FI: AN^ SFE LLC 6FUSCOE cSET �� • � � OM7/Nn - - ;' Jim ] nn 7t,� ,III 55.064 SF 155.5.o6L S.F 'f '.'°'• "` ..._ ..a. L03.1.565 GF _, . . I'll T rI I I Jill i la N NNYYy L III t �II JIM ui IMLca%cz I I III{,11111 565 s:: I I I I I 111.f I L–_---1 \ rL �,. I� ��..•] .: I I� r111 - I� I ) l I _ •.— wT. aae - .. : w>�u ♦vain I CONCEPTUAL WATER 8 SEWER PLAN ENGMEER OWNER SKET. ~ i�l FUSCOE _ o„000uulNalcno vEE uc Sq p'Yw�Y2.Wl ��q a { su. • 1F1:4Y.W.SW _ MIRY.MCF 12 OIZIAt] 1.k e� III � i _ � � ... � � {�_— — — — <I ItII 555664 SF SF ffJLDM 2 1 -.565 5F 03Z .............. Ca.rn II K�4r 2 IL---------------------------------------- - - a ---------- ..... lk EASEMENTPLAN J C mm wm s FF I BIJ"c I (, 555.664 S F. O 505664 SF. -1 I m viii ... . . .. _ T l ih I. a IV Ln ' I r, . - - 1 L_______________________ -------------------- iii � I L----- /nr CI� I 1 1 � EASEMENT PLAN(PHASE ) ENGINEER OWNER SIl4l. HR11CIq 5PE LLC ~ r FUSCOE N, .N,..�..,..,,, 9 m WMO WfE 121] i ' I -�asAi WILDNC 2 ,`. 4057.565 SFpill T i I ;'EKXDMG2 I Q - EASEMENT PLAN(PHASE 2) NGNEER OWNER SIFEl.' ~ FUSCOE coowuwwwcNosrE.uc 10 12• • oemaon STA. 13+00 I BEGIN p WALL/ _ • I STA 17+00 i I I I•e ' ; STA 20+00 I I • l i 1 I `(s_ END WALL21+55.34 r pj IE r e pp h i A - f STA.20+00 bn D Oil jk i Y N6 w f�1Q" m j STA 13+00 STA. 17+DD 8Z-E)Ij131G SDTA. 7+55.23 STA.3+55.23 • t BEGIN ,—WALL I I it it ll I 'BE4 WALL I , i E i i E I i � I • m 0 i � I i I �3• J END WALLY STAG 1+3600 ij t; n m I 'N 2 m I n , b i f I ! Gi f ' I � -STA'. 3+55.23 m x END WALL STA. 11+44.54 STA. 7+55.23 1 fUN0.E I TEIIOWWOOD 1 `5 1 IhU_. 1; F Ik I Y C) I � i _ � i uC� �•� RFS 8o_�.�.E: t --- ---- I I I 1 — coNCEPTuu cPnolNC PLNI ( _ • .. A1 r TPM M.19I _.._ GOOOM. LOGI9tIC$CENTEfl FMICIq CUCNMONW GOODM NNCHO$P ,LLC I _ _ - _ IYCNx.n .stare um I I :I.. .reUm°�eoo i m T.T: E GINE M .yIFE(,• M �I FUSCOE r : OY!]1A13 v 9 ..m..WY m'""'.. .m i.0 �ub,4�0�1y,5•�1d ...>r�...A.....ea. � tz � w ....,�k.;X,T t:-'k _.� wulur.mutw�r ....�.�........_.,."�.��.........•.--•.- Ilk �.'n�kN •.� mr3��3us ... 3tls .,�' A. Ikk ■ —smn Sl- __ � -. z v' .. _�_ o� .- m_e Ilk I. .• ..r.�.r. tee. .m-..v.v_ I (l: ^� F m •}W ® � . 1, E +H-41 a:� r�mwo� �C E C _,. _ - ■ vilk —vmn ill pp r T�-m- t— -I m i .. a I M Ilk O nNormn0 �il 1 r T� -m r—r- i" 1 -""' i. ...w ...., u.n LL 831 30W SOUS ........ 1I l OOI NVWa rwaooD + — s B is ._,.. yam NILsL �� ��.�. -�1 �' , • k�f _�_ k�� I` -<YeEI is _ I i, rr I I "iT r Tr Tr 1 , 1 JJ----ll ILL—JJIJJJ 1L--JJ--..11 _1"t �• I_{�— L i - - - - - N HUEW lk kIllk I ' � ' i X r � 1 mat *I 771itl ses'F I I Ig ° I I IG0 1 1 ml I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ➢ ( V I I I „„mm, 4, -4' � � -j -I -F-r-f � L°STICS ➢ Y T RANCHO ! I ♦ w c AMONGA BUILDING 1 w �. - T DE„Y 91LM F7 naw,n o.aN. ApP9u111 � S i%//: %/1°,�sy ■ Z. rlauulgY mfif M t um NAY ') i AppIN 8 np.Y<NYr. rl A� �. '�'w� °��•" 911E PLAN YEYNOIE9 511E EIOEA SRE LEYEIO VIfMM1YAP a AU of duf p.P.<fY - m.....o '.. _ Os,4.:_. A.e.P.I<M NmnfY< e _ m�Am^... ®V...•�iw�o.v o'er. Q,.,n .. . ,..Y : T I i Ucxr. C> PNjRI: GOODMAN - r - - YLOGISTICS RANCHO T - yy _ g CUCAMONCAMONGA �DUILDWO I v^ W 4 t t f gal i ( 1 Co..W.. 'Ii:TY It�Sf.H1t81' �IIBIffi ml®fA51 fll®' SIiE ftIN EEYMOTE9 WEOSIE% SIZE IEGEMD 1-A1.2 .. ..... ... _ »P�: nr,.•.wr.~i. M3da 3IIS ...^.. �' ,`. `•.-.a ....•� a 4i,'. w•n m i w ^ awro .n, w.. .®ns,..,.w... n.t— 1`•. YFFik�F'-'--raife#.'Fi _ - _ y -�_•...: .•L2 _ .-.. _.. .._ __ _ r pomrme.i I is i 0 _ .- a� �-- ; I - -I- T-7-T- - �I-fJ -T-T - I IT -IT-TTI _1 (j �l-fJT T_T 1-1-I-I J T �l-fJ T T T T T z�wamre °., �• - — — - - - 1RJNOWV�fYJ - - — OIgNVtl - a x IEa S LL SJLLSY'J01WIND "OOM _ 9 I�� I I TTTT _ _ w m m= L_1_L_L_LJ-LJ_-i 1_L L I-1_I_L_ 1 L_LJ-L� T _i_1_L_LJ-1J_�_ m.v n.. a• •'nom ill � � �' i JI . . _ . . . -- - - - 'wY. o III ; `:A•. t U \\�\\ RRNR \\*� 1 ) _ _ NIOl 09_ wnn. , / L � \ snMA"r d_._ I _ _ _ Mrc L / / FIFIF i mm m - � o > OSA m I I _ CUCAMONGA BALDING... / �. ♦ ' � r /' t� O ; V / i CunuAunm - �� j� ._ v A Pt IF ■ Sitz PIAN zzyxOTE9 511E SIOEi SRE LEOEIz) 2-A1.2 rn � • KEINGTES-FLOGPftAN • . . . . . . J— —_I—_�_ _�_�_ �_ _�_�_�_�_�_�_�_�_ �__�_�_—I__L—� • GENERAL NGTES-FLGGN PLAN OuILaiWlc 1 1 1 I ' • 1 1--I— I— r--r-�-fi r-�-�-�--�- rt -t--t--rt-�-�--1 —I--I--� C`,' y . � �=��Te- Y _ RGGP 9lAB ANG Pg1P STPoPS PEQ • a. GOODMAN � .... LOGISTIC S fT CENTER RANCHO BUILDING 1 W .D rccEss nom / WE INDEX ■ TIENTUFO L O ,ICE LJ j /. iyy+oe"..J m m m c Irl ® 1-A2.1 t a . . . . a • . YETNOTES-MOOR PIAN • a- o "'-" o i— I i IT7TTTl fTTTTTI i IT7T >— Tl f I o • p __ 7—f TT aF GENERAL NOTES-FLOOR — PWI rt I-� T r-(-1 f _ I-1-7-T-T-V f l a � T�T l in l T_T T '- ° ` 1_L_�1_L�_ _-- t •MOORSIA.ANDD RSTWPS R10. L__ll_-_1.1_L,,,LJ_LJ_L_1_L_l—_I_ll_ C_1_L_L_LJ_L�_ - "�`� ■ • P ,jac �-.....t ....__��..,_,.....o. aGOODMAN I'fl P a .�'--'•'� LOGISTICS�L'..k.—,....... P CENTER 1 "I RANCHO "I l CUCAMONGA BUILDING 2 Lu rn Drum-BYGBnA1�V POTENTIAL OFFICE 1 ~`�� «` ��—�- -M ■ WE INDEX ,_YYwoy I I � ' I 1 I E 2-A2.1 i --- -- r---- oma..-.,..r-..�..-,�..a..�..... � 841LDING ; 1 J T_ m • .� �L • �uuv....n,u. Ll4�wnw,e.nn ■ • II vwno m. 0.= _ f= _ _ ___ __II 1 • amxHi�`.ar varu..noxs _ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I • • �� �� ;' r.�,: m ' 0 j GOOD"n CE TE T . • • • • • r • • - �a; RANCHO . »-..-... CUCAWNGA — __—__-_._.___.-_______ __..—_-- —____ ..oTA1•LL•44f PMU ® ® BUILDING 1 W V • I I I I I I I I I -^�- I c I I I • -- I I I — G I I I ■ _. _. . . .POTEITIAL•OFFICE I I i i I - ;.,. ® 1-A2.2 a • T — 77 Toma • [ `� — - a • - 'r- � - If_....._,._ a SRE NUE[ I„ 0n •. : ! GOODMAN _ -- y.itL� LOGISTICS T a - CENTER LnRANCHOCUCAMONGAu 00 Lal ■ CwuWu u: POTENTIAL OFFICE - I ■ m= r° I I I I I I I I I I I I EMS r-r-- (a 0 IPA liplill pal • owl owl* 9 NOW 0, x= Ij ! i I 0 000 °' O 00 ooe eeoo ; e EEEE� s ! Gn � Cf o n5 4-1 - , I �1 C' � ° �WIQZIaR�c e'm ° s \ XV ° e.. 1=• �o .. � o o �-�o ate:. C,, �®h' ice\ k C r L. e , o f I: mmmm- ZEM r1i; 71 O a u 71 ° Sid �i3 o T yam} O .mo:m .N m: win __Laeeoea.EsA=IA1k.E{LYA1mN%.l - L -'- _..._ _ ■ _MIAW CQ \,m,,, c''Q ■ GOODMAN c LOGISTICS T CENTER T RANCHO - UCwDING II� _R �. 'i.:it 1 .. � .. ...- _ ■ ._pLAE9Ep_IAy.Ap9A1[IIEYd71WHl le\ NEYHOTE9-FLEVATNIN.9 N m GEN NOM-ELEVATNINR m' COLOR RCHEO:-ELEVATNIHS ---------- _nsLE19.LE6NLLV T _____ Uw w 1-A4.1 A 171.71:Ili rt-1�THE J ..• --� 11—i t 11 — �_ j: I , __ , !("cif . ..�'�'(... .,.•.r' '' j,+ - � " 1 It '' _ -- TE8-aEVAiZW C i KEYKO L1•a� fit'. ills 11 It III +.. it I wE: 9?_s:c�.p• 44 +�wm i "'FS* E , J I U ' ili 1I �� _ F. ��S�1:^C�.�.:- � ■� _. .._ .. . . ..-... . . O \5 AN OEMEMLIM)TE9-FLEVATKNI9 LOGISTICS T ..�.-..- - CENTER RANCHO CUCAMONGA .n en �cmforer BUILDING 2 COLOR SCRED.-ELEVA1 ■ ❑O-.u.-� __ _ Cwuduns coo 14 .. - ■ i ego L F or �n.,R s F� it`t -;.t.... .. 1 rel■ '.` --------------------------------- ----- - - — -- -- - - ------- ------------------------------------ 2-A4.1 wr c > , um �u�e� 9 —��■���"I ' 777,777-77.57, •�g,� 9.� .Ibdf" � ° �6 Imo® gg ���Y�Y�p�fl�ll��� -���I�Il�ll�l�i�� �� ■II■B�I�1 _..�,......._,_....__..d _.xt 71 wt,-z. .._ % {....._.._ ...�,..�._ .rix,�.''i, t FFFF=75, • ■II■1�1 �$�!!!I!l��. _..__.._�YI�Y■IIY �.._. ._,.:...:.� rm _ EYIII■YY�� 1a11��9a ® ;.�: yll■Il�lltt xaa�,, Y■RIN ! 8..o-.! y b IAYlwdF ETi 4 � "' .�� y'd � a a •r^s '.:� e.�..se. = :y...,..:, � s '� a xa� a� `3 :4!ky c ', �: HPA n , Jobk1211200 COLORED ELEVATIONS :11th SC REE NWA LLS - BUILDING 1 02.112013 ' x tL z z» °sp�lllll�lt �'��© ��c���R�ll�d�ll�ll�ll��� �[]['Jp�p�">• ��•II�II�N �d�9��A� ���_1�1 �u�ll�ll�u�ll�li� uuS <s . h'sd eyes t 3="'q C" .# r S - �" _ x - r� a1 w r 's .:.��u�IIII�Y�1�1� s rrt �� �� _.+-� r �t .�..s -.1..t t.:'._ :aka:ae�.�!@'.k'.�...,ax».s.>c�!."..'!+L.mzziwxii4'R,S�,'�..ax.,.w il':n31F]{�7a#('1!sa�..o w� vnw,sc�.�.'d :vn»•:xms�n�w�"b:�'�uwnwrs.,�:5�1,,lS�ml mua�',hG'�t^�.r....crt�,._..�ra�'._.'1�.._ ou���i' �!•`'W�HOM Fillass 1 .v�. "-' kf�a'...'C...CZs,�� r r :r a c t x.s 'i _'�."a'rks..� `° xt o I,._.,�-TGpa'iwa� t''i b ali ftl' i =•.t � ' ���Cir•ol� CSE����IIPa' _.k3,'.�.,. _ z4. (._ » ?.�€a tl��_F.-L,_. e ,S"i"a� t_._._ ev } ♦ . l*'x-. zc fix`- a3�x Ysw. �iit z'' 'T �-- .t' 'y �t:��S*�'z*�.r,k�xr'iv �`r..k'z�' ''� \ yx` mn"pil a1�M i r H.. f h t iMINIONS 9139 . �}} NRi'� I ' <"'� -0 - '� mr G^ Gcd' S_1w.dma L �S: °k`". G, H PA .. a rY Jo6u12112.00 COLORED ELEVATIONS mth SCREENWALLS - BUILDING 2 02.11.'_013 X .., a _ F 9 H EVAWN m-uaa r.n GOODMAN T .—. __ _- - --_ ..__-- :...... _ ..,. ..,I' CENTER RANCHO T _ _ _ _ - _ _ ___ CAMON GA BUILDING :.. it 0 it ■ I � � H rn • • • XARROW ROUTE WI _ �rfiAlunuNrfslc•n i(Fl r i • - I = Building 1 9 µgRMMw _ ..................,...�a _ o xx --------------------------------------------- __ _____ _ In RMITING LEGEND In Building 2 O Overall Site Plan Sheet 1 kaYx 1111 kr ti 'r s A �G'ood ran` Loglstics�Center Rancho Cucamonga Goodman Birtcher 9 ����P HDNIERLANDSCAPE �1.,,:;. "" •+` 'z, - 3 Rancho Cucamonga.Caliloma 't v s.mnw ` PIANlING LEGEND ARROW ROUTE i t willusp, III II I � i ; ; i � lll III � � QD ®-_ ' 11 I 11 +WK a i A � ® �_ IT— IT o..ti. Iuuu- Ou�T,T, OODOoi juuu olwveoi� -� o- 0uuuo--u.uuo -....Iuu I / �f ocooao� /d� Building 1 mm In �a _.�ppp.�C�pC�pp.�pppppp.�ppp�p.�pnpp� �ppppp�. ��pp.,�pppp�_, i 11 � r Building 1 Site Plan Sheet 2 CC7 � Y s Goodman Lo "t."s gc ppt6rvRancho Cucarnonga Goodman Birtcher HuxreRLArvuscAre .,. °`�`ag`'gG. x'x' T Rancho Cucamonga.California n v.wrNw • RANTING IEC£NU •+a a...n®re a an ..m•wrn !% �uti Mr • , B r_ T a Ln -P. ---------- $ a..a• a e _ - oo —_� III Building 2 o== ��- ❑ ❑ ' ❑ l / x f p Building 2 Site Plan Sheet Goodman ,L'ogistics Ceniter Rancho Cucamonga Goodman Birtcher M HENLA,uscAe RonCho Cucamonga.California � PL 11 LEGEND i n 9 a n , It o _ .. . Building 2 ® _ I . I �d 1 ! amici h xocr x�P I Building 2 Site Plan Sheet 4 4I'y x Gootlrnan Logistics Center Rancho Cucgrnon a Goodman Birtcner HUNTER LANDSCAPE xxl�N[,_n Rancho Cucamonga.California •~� Nn,~ • • uaoi.emx .mr. o�omm� W - . c 'C�� �`. ° 4�5� -v ie)e� �.5 i �� ��i �o A'��k ti �5'i k� - i.mcn.�■T.J® pb°�a d • � .x3'1,+1 .�....,,( C � n /� :,�� / � .. ».:.! n�rc.xs..• ab 55q; a i • • d ' �_ cif yle+e 0es4y < S a G d .;y,7Dai,y�Ya'a♦•"+e`Yx.P'eJ 000000 .J0000�.900"O:P 0y0 OOa700 �'P �'7�0� .���`eer��o • •• • ©mom i (P OBD r .y;Do 0 _,,,,/�00000000�rl y� az� v Dau" c�••i - "1l'lt'1.f'�"R"` •"""L"YS �t"��'��'�IP'b 1�Wy9 e+++°Bc ct�•+a'"oti,+��+�+,Mi+y��eo�oiq+Rei v w/x e'r'��. 1(, Q"•^"9C'e od%weq�` �.s wee p.��im t% f, .+::v.$cl�"111DtaQaCiblk2_FJaACBffiC_� e>� rn _ l 2 �y}Vii\ • / �. �., N n �{-� s .'. ■ .. . l oN Y `If N Vii , ST DAL UNG 2 10,1 n.• GOODMAN LOGISTICS i I I 1'1'1 ,_ I CENTER ° x ti RANCHO T n CUCAMONGA ' d ? MtdE�w G�56,Yrs4 yj I , .. (uroulnmv I 517E LIGHTING PLAN FIXTURE LEGEND LIGHTING 5TATISTIGS roeN., r•^ o I SL 1 I Z 1 f c 9 t .a � P SNOI1Vn3l OI 31X Z �7NI4 I Ip ..:-,. —;t•4 r �+�.." F taF i e i�_ %F ..b.+ A w fi ,.� ,.M• lfl �tlONOWtl000 OHOWU n L W 831N30 9011SIO01 NYW0000 �.wn...,�. a ... .... ....... a a �jgz .r•-.,:eta-.�: Fre re.= .._..i',a., i.�,,.�. :- - .._:w.�. 00 TREE ISLAND WIRE (USA), INC. 3880 W.Valley Blvd. •Walnut,CA 97789 tel 800.255.8974 fax 909.595.0439 treelsland.com August 8, 2013 The City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department: 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 .Attention: Mr. Mike Smith Re Planning Department Case No. DRC 2 01 3-001 55, SUBTPM 19448 and DRC 2013- 001; APNs 0229-137-25 and 0229:131-04 I Dear Mr. Smith:. This letter regards the access to the properties of Goodman Logistics, Gerdau and • Tree Island located on Arrow.Route near Etiwanda Avenue:We understand that Goodman Logistics is processing plan approvals with the City for a development on their site.Those plans,with the above referenced case number, include relocating the access into the parcels owned by Goodman Logistics, Gerdau and Tree Island. I Tree island Wire USA, Inc. and Goodman Logistics have met and discussed various scenarios for'altering the access to our properties, and the enclosed concept plan is acceptable to Tree Island:. The parties have not finalized a revised reciprocal easement agreement. Nevertheless,Tree Island did not wish to delay informing the City that the concept plans are agreeable. Please call me if you would like to discuss. Sincerely, eBruce Yost r Director of obal Procurement. 909-594 7 11 K LATH EXHIBIT NI. WIT" THE DEBT O M •Il D.E.F.G-54 1 4 1 - pig1 � 1 � I I � I II � ia�i+l�n I I Il ; I I � I I I � I { I I 1 1 D,E,F,G-55 i m GERDAU • July 19, 2013 The City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attention: Mr. Mike Smith Re: Planning Department Case No. DRC 2013-00155, SUBTPM 19448 and DRC 2013- 001; APNs 0229-131-25 and 0229-131-04 Dear Mr. Smith: This letter regards the access to the properties of Goodman Logistics, Gerdau and Tree Island located on Arrow Route near Etiwanda Avenue. We understand that Goodman Logistics is processing plan approvals with the City for a development on their site. Those plans, with the above referenced case number, include relocating the access into the parcels owned by Goodman Logistics, Gerdau and Tree Island. Gerdau and Goodman Logistics have met and discussed various scenarios for altering the access to our properties, and the enclosed concept plan is acceptable to Gerdau. It involves (and is contingent upon) the location of three CVWD meters on public right of way adjacent to the Goodman property, • with backflows through the Goodman Property connecting to Gerdau property, as shown on the concept plan. The parties are still discussing cost allocation and maintenance responsibility for the relocated driveway, and final plans and specifications will need to be approved. Nevertheless, Gerdau did not wish to delay informing the City that the concept plans are agreeable. Please call me if you would like to discuss. Sincerely, Michael Boyken, PMP i Project Engineer Gerdau—Rancho Cucamonga Mill Office: (909) 646-7832 Mobile: (909) 296-0473 Email : michael.boyken@gerdau.com • Rancho Cucamonga Mill 12459-B Arrow Route Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 I i D,E,F,G-56 �An -—--—--—-- — It--—-- - - ---------------- -- ------ -- r�RT m ---------------- N�\ ±no I'VA RJISCOE .......... iTr a TIES -- —- — Page-1 of 2 Smith, Michael • From: Pam Steele[pams@migcom.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2013 8:42 AM To: Smith, Michael Cc: Ward Mace Subject: Rancho Cucamonga Goodman Logistics Center meetings re:Whittram intersection Mike, Ward Mace and I had two very productive meetings yesterday afternoon with the business owners of the two properties at the intersection of Etiwanda and Whittram. The following is a brief summary: Southeast corner, Tony's Landscape & Co We met with Gene De Biase at his property to discuss the upcoming street improvements in Etiwanda and in the intersection with Whittram. We noted that the first construction in the street will most likely be the installation of the master plan storm drain line. We provided 11 x 17 exhibits showing the intersection layout that has been tentatively approved by the City Traffic and Engineering staff. We pointed out that for his property the ultimate street right-of-way has been dedicated and the street improvements will stay within that right-of-way. However, since some of the trees and utility appurtenances are in the right-of-way in the right-of-way where improvements are needed, those will be removed or relocated when the street improvements are made. Mr. De Biase asked that we give him notification in advance of the street improvements- as well as mark the right-of-way so that he can relocate any of the palm trees that may be encroaching into the right-of-way. He noted that • he is not concerned about the eucalyptus trees, but the palm trees are related to his business. We confirmed that we will let him know well in advance. Northeast corner,Tole House Cafe We met with Mike Colles, owner of the cafe operation. .Mr. Colles stated that he is not the owner of the property and that we should contact Sarah Music who is the manager of the property for Donna Columbaro. Again we described the upcoming storm drain installation and provided 1 Ix17 exhibits to Mr. Colles to review the proposed street improvements with him. We noted that even though the ultimate right-of-way has not been dedicated, the proposed street improvements will, therefore,be interim in nature and will stay within the existing right-of-way and will not impact the operation of the cafe as it is currently configured. There will, obviously,be disruption during construction, however, that will be a temporary condition. Mr. Colles noted that the cafe is open for breakfast and lunch only - from 5 a.m. to 3 p.m. He asked that we notify him in advance of the start of construction for the street improvements so they can be prepared. I have also placed a call to Mrs. Columbaro's property manager to discuss the street improvements. I will update you after I speak with her. Please let me know if you have any questions regarding our meetings. Thank you for your assistance with this project, Pam • Pam Steele EXHIBIT P DT-F.G—SR - —- ---- - - - --- ._... - Page 2 of 2 Principal Please note my new e-mail address is DamsOmigcom.com • MIG I Hogle Ireland 1500 Iowa Avenue, Suite #110 Riverside, California 92507 0: 951 787 9222 1 C: 951 733 5240 1 www.migcom.com This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are Intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are NOT the Intended recipient, be advised that you have received this e-mail in error and that any use, dissemination, posting, forwarding, printing or copying of this e-mail and any attachments is Illegal and strictly prohibited by law. • • 10/15/2013 D,E,F,G-59 Page l of 4 Smith, Michael • From: Pam Steele [pams@migcom.com) Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2013 12:08 PM To: Smith, Michael Subject: Fwd: Goodman Rancho project, west side of Etiwanda Please see below for my e-mail conversation with Ms. Musich. Pam ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Pam Steele<pams(a migcom.com> Date: Mon,Aug 19, 2013 at 9:22 AM Subject: Re: Goodman Rancho project, west side of Etiwanda To: Sarah Musich<Sarahni city-commercial com> Cc: Ward Mace<ward.mace0)goodman com> Sarah, Thank you for letting us know of your concerns. Please see below for our responses in red to each: • 1. Interruption of traffic flow to the businesses during and after construction. With any construction project in the street, there will be traffic lanes closed or shifted, however,traffic flow in both directions will be maintained and access to each business will also be maintained during construction. Following construction the traffic flow should be improved because there will be a traffic signal at the intersection which will help. 2. Blocking visibility to the businesses during construction. Visibility to the businesses will be maintained as much as possible. We will also request from the City that a sign be posted stating"Businesses open during construction"-or something similar. 3. Loss of any of our property(parking spaces, driveways, etc) during or after construction The street improvements were specifically designed so that there will be no loss of parking spaces or driveway access either during or after construction. Hopefully this addresses your concerns. If you need additional information or would like to meet with us, please let us know. Pam On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Sarah Musich <Sarah ct city-commercial com>wrote: • Hi Pam, i 10/15/2013 n F I: r,-An Page 2 of 4 Thanks for the information, although I'm having a hard time determining the exact impact to our property. But here are our general concerns: • 1. Interruption of traffic flow to the businesses during and after construction. 2. Blocking visibility to the businesses during construction. 3. loss of any of our property(parking spaces, driveways, etc)during or after construction We want to be workable,so long as our client isn't negatively impacted in any way. Please let me know what measures are being taken to minimize the problems that could arise from our concerns above. Thanks, Sarah Musich, Property Manager Rancho Cucamonga Industrial Center • Sarah Musich,Property Manager CityCom Real Estate Services,Inc. City Commercial Management 9489 Haven Avenue,Suite 200 P.O.Box 548 Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91729 C9Q9)_94B-1fl52 (800)578.2409 toll free (909)948-1349 Fax email:sarahglicitiLtommemial com • 10/15/2013 D.E.F.G-61 - - - Page 3 of 4 From: Pam Steele [mailto:pam_s@migcomcom] Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2013 12:20 PM is To: Sarah Musich Cc: Ward Mace Subject: Goodman Rancho project, west side of Etiwanda Sarah, It was a pleasure to talk with you on the phone late yesterday. As we discussed, attached is an exhibit which shows the required street improvements at the intersection of Whittram and Etiwanda. One thing I forgot to mention on the phone is that we will also be installing a traffic signal at the intersection. On the exhibit the black dashed line depicts the right-of-way and the red lines show the proposed street improvements - as well as pointing out some existing conditions such as power poles and utility features. As you can see, the proposed improvements will not encroach onto the current parking spaces or drive aisles for the Tole House Cafe. The fuschia dashed line shows the ultimate right-of- way- in other words, the right-of-way that will be required at some future date if the property owner proposes to redevelop the property. • If you have questions about the exhibitor the improvements,please call or e-mail me. Thank you, Pam Pam Steele Principal Please note my new e-mail address is pams@migcom..com MIG I Hogle Ireland 1500 Iowa Avenue, Suite #110 Riverside, California 92507 • O: 951 787 9222 1 C: 951 733 5240 1 www.migcom.com This e-mail and any Flies transmitted with it are confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to 10/15/2013 D.E.F.G-62 _...... - _- _ . - - _ Page 4of4 whom they are addressed. If you are NOT the Intended recipient, be advised that you have received this e-mail in error and that any use, dissemination, posting, forwarding, printing or copying of this e-mail and any attachments Is illegal and strictly prohibited by law. • Pam Steele Principal Please note my new e-mail address is pams@miccom.com MIG I Hogle Ireland 1500 Iowa Avenue, Suite #110 Riverside, California 92507 O: 951 787 92221 C: 951 733 5240 1 www.miaCom.com This e-mail and any files transmitted with It are confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are NOT the Intended recipient, be advised that you have received this e-mail in error and that any use, dissemination, posting,forwarding, printing or copying of this e-mail and any attachments is illegal and strictly prohibited by law. Pam Steele Principal Please note my new e-mail address is yams@migcom.com MIG I Hogle Ireland 1500 Iowa Avenue, Suite #110 Riverside, California 92507 0: 951 787 9222 1 C: 951 733 5240 1 www.migcom.com This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are Intended solely for the use of the Individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are NOT the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this e-mail in error and that any use, dissemination, posting, forwarding, printing or copying of this e-mail and any attachments is illegal and strictly prohibited by law. • 10/15/2013 D.E.F.G-63 • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:00 p.m. Mike Smith September 17, 2013 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19448 - MIG/HOGLE- IRELAND FOR GOODMAN RANCHO SPE, LLC -A review of a tentative parcel map in conjunction with a proposal to construct two (2) industrial warehouse buildings of 555,664 square feet (Building 1/Phase 1) and 1,033,565 square feet (Building 2/Phase 2) on a property comprised of three (3) parcels with a combined area of 3,255,834 square feet (74.7 acres), which is currently developed with a concrete pipe manufacturing/storage facility (formerly operated by Ameron International) in the Heavy Industrial (HI) District located at the southwest corner of Arrow Route and'Etiwanda Avenue -APN: 0229-131-04, -17, and -25. Related files: Development Review DRC2013-00155, Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00315, and Uniform Sign Program DRC2013-00316. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00155 - MIG/HOGLE- IRELAND FOR GOODMAN RANCHO SPE, LLC - A review of a proposal to construct two (2) industrial warehouse buildings of 555,664 square feet (Building 1/Phase 1) and 1,033,565 square feet (Building 2/Phase 2) on a property comprised of three (3) parcels with a combined area of 3,255,834 square feet (74.7 acres), which is currently developed with a concrete pipe manufacturing/storage facility (formerly operated by Ameron International) within the Heavy Industrial (HI) District, located at the southwest comer of Arrow Route and Etiwanda Avenue -APN: 0229-131-04, -17, and -25. Related files: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19448, Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00315, and Uniform Sign Program DRC2013-00316. • Site Characteristics: The project site is a property comprised of five (5) parcels with a combined area of 3,255,834 square feet (74.7 acres) located at the southwest comer of Etiwanda Avenue and Arrow Route. The street frontage along Arrow Route is approximately 2,600 feet, while the street frontage along Etiwanda Avenue is approximately 1,700 feet. The site is an inactive concrete pipe manufacturing/storage facility that was operated by Ameron International, Inc. There are several buildings (of various sizes and purpose), outdoor equipment, areas for parking and storage, and associated infrastructure on the site. Most of the existing buildings are located at the north side of the site near Arrow Route. The southeastern part of the site was primarily used for the storage of finished concrete pipes. Paving on the site is generally limited to the parking areas and the associated access driveways. To the west and south, are manufacturing facilities operated by Tree Island Wire and Gerdau, respectively. To the north, are a chemical manufacturing facility operated by Air Liquide and a water storage facility operated by the Metropolitan Water District (MWD). To the east, are several small commercial (e.g. ARCO and Tole-House Caf6) and industrial businesses. The Victoria Woods apartment complex is located northeast of the site at the northeast comer of Etiwanda Avenue and Arrow Route. The subject property and the properties to the west and south are zoned Heavy Industrial (HI) District, while the properties to the east and north are zoned General Industrial (GI) District. The property at the northeast comer of Etiwanda Avenue and Arrow Route is zoned Medium (M) Residential, Etiwanda Specific Plan (South Overlay). The landscaping is generally limited to trees and small shrubs along Arrow Route and along the private driveway that is shared with the adjacent properties at the west side of the site. An additional north to south row of trees is located parallel to (and approximately 300 feet west of) Etiwanda Avenue. The site is generally level with an elevation of approximately 1,160 feet and 1,125 feet at the northwest and • southeast comers, respectively, of the site. EXHIBIT Q D.E.F.G-64 DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTION AGENDA SUBTPM19448 AND DRC2013-0155—MIG/HOGLE-IRELAND FOR GOODMAN RANCHO SPE, LLC • September 17, 2013 Page 2 Design Parameters: The applicant proposes to redevelop the site in two (2) phases by constructing two (2) industrial warehouse buildings of 555,664 square feet(Building 1/Phase 1)and 1,033,565 square feet (Building 2/Phase 2) with a combined floor area of 1,589,229 square feet. No tenants have been specified at this time. The basic layout of each building will be typical for warehouse buildings. The primary (or long) axis for Building 1 will be aligned east to west, and the primary axis of Building 2 will be aligned north to south. There will be three (3)potential office areas in each building. These offices could potentially be located at the northwest, northeast, and southwest comers of Building 1, and at the northwest, northeast, and southeast comers of Building 2. The outdoor employee eating areas with overhead shade structures will be provided at each office area. The proposed buildings will be of concrete tilt-up construction and will be painted with a palette of four(4) colors. The boldest of the three colors will be "The Goodman Green," which is the applicant's custom corporate color. This color will be utilized primarily on the wall planes at the office areas of the building and at intervals along the north and south elevations of Building 1 and the east and west elevations of Building 2. An additional primary material will be sandblasted concrete. Sandblasted concrete will appear as sets of three horizontal bands. Each band will have a vertical dimension of (2) feet. These bands will be applied at various locations along all the elevations of each building. Glass panels will serve as a secondary material. These glass panels will be extensively used at the office areas. At the primary entrance to each office, there will be a combination of spandrel and vision glass that will be applied to the full height of the wall plane with only metal canopies visually interrupting the glass facade. Glass panels are also proposed at various locations along all elevations of each building. Wall • articulation will be most significant at the office comers of the building. On the east and west elevations of Building 1 and the north and south elevations of Building 2, there will be insets, five (5) feet in width and two (2)feet in depth, at regular intervals between the offices areas that will interrupt the relatively flat wall planes of these elevations. The top of the parapets will be articulated, as well, at the office areas, at regular intervals where the insets are located, and at various locations where the wall planes have been embellished with glass and/or sandblasted bands. The dock loading areas for Building 1 will be located on the north and south sides of the building. The dock loading areas for Building 2 will be located on the east and west sides of the building. Note that the north dock loading area and associated trailer parking for Building 1, and the east dock loading area and associated trailer parking of Building 2 will be located adjacent to, and therefore facing, Arrow Route and Etiwanda Avenue, respectively. The orientation of the dock areas face towards the streets, which is in public view and is generally not preferred. The dock areas for this project will be screened by walls constructed of concrete tilt-up panels with 8-foot high metal sliding gates at the entrances to the dock areas. These walls will be a minimum of 8 feet in height. In some areas along Arrow Route, the finished surface elevation of the dock area at Building 1 will be up to 6 feet below the finished surface elevation of the street. Visibility of the dock areas will be further reduced as each dock area will be a minimum of 45 feet from the respective streets they adjoin (measured from the curb). The buildings and corresponding dock doors will be setback approximately 235 feet from the respective streets they face (measured from the curb). Between the wall and Arrow Route there will be landscaping comprised of ground cover, shrubs, and trees. The landscaping between the wall and Etiwanda Avenue will be similar. However, the landscaping along Etiwanda Avenue will be limited to shrubs and ground cover because of an existing Metropolitan Water District (MWD) pipeline and easement. The District's technical/maintenance requirements and easement restrictions prohibit the planting of trees, including street trees, along Etiwanda Avenue. The top edge of the screen walls will be articulated to reflect the articulation of the • parapets on the buildings. The walls also will be painted and finished to match the color and material theme of the buildings. D.E.F.G-65 DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTION AGENDA • SUBTPM19448 AND ORC2013-0155— MIG/HOGLE-IRELAND FOR GOODMAN RANCHO SPE, LLC September 17, 2013 Page 3 Parking for the employees and visitors will be arranged near the office areas. Five (5) points of direct access from the public right-of-way will be provided to the project site - three (3) driveways along Arrow Route and two (2) driveways along Etiwanda Avenue. An additional two (2) points of access will be provided via the private driveway along the west side of the site. The parking requirement for the project, based on the proposed mix of office and warehouse floor areas in each building is 513 parking stalls (197 stalls for Building 1 and 316 parking stalls for Building 2); the project will have 518 parking stalls (198 stalls for Building 1 and 320 parking stalls for Building 2). The trailer parking requirement, based on a ratio of one stall per dock door, is 297 parking stalls (130 stalls for Building 1 and 167 stalls for Building 2); the project will have 397 parking stalls (130 stalls for Building 1 and 267 parking stalls for Building 2). The required landscape coverage within the Heavy Industrial (HI) District is 5 percent of the project site 'area (the minimum is 10 percent within 1,000 feet of Arrow Route). The project will have landscape coverage of 10 percent within 1,000 feet of Arrow Route and landscape coverage 17.9 percent on the remainder of the site. The overall landscape coverage will be 12.31 percent. At the southwest corner of the intersection of Arrow. Route and Etiwanda Avenue, the applicant will provide enhanced landscaping. A bus shelter will also be provided near this intersection. The proposal includes a tentative parcel map to consolidate the five (5) parcels that comprise the project site into two (2) parcels that will correspond with each building. The new parcels will comply with the City's standards. As a part of the tentative parcel map application, the applicant will be revising the various easements that affect the project site including those relating to access. The applicant • coordinated with Tree Island Wire and Gerdau, the property owners that share access through, and have easements within, the private driveway along the west side of the site, to ensure that all interested entities accept the revisions to the easements and the physical improvements that will occur as a result of this project. Staff has received signed documents from representatives of both Tree Island Wire and Gerdau indicating acceptance of the project as it applies to them. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Major/Secondary Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project. None. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues. None. Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion. 1. All ground-mounted equipment and utility boxes including transformers, back-flow devices, etc. shall be screened by a minimum of two rows of shrubs spaced a minimum of 18 inches on center. This equipment shall be painted dark green. 2. All Double Detector Checks (DDCs) and Fire Department Connections (FDCs) shall be screened • on three sides behind 4-foot high walls. The walls shall incorporate the design and materials used on the buildings. D.E.F.G-66 DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTION AGENDA SUBTPM19448 AND DRC2013-0155— MIG/HOGLE-IRELAND FOR GOODMAN RANCHO SPE, LLC • September 17, 2013 Page 4 3. The overhead trellis within employee lunch areas shall have cross members with minimum dimensions of 4 inches by 12 inches. 4. All wrought iron fences and sliding gates shall be painted black or a similarly dark color. 5. Decorative paving shall be provided at all vehicular access points onto the site. 6. All doors (roll-up, dock doors, emergency access) shall be painted to match the color of the adjacent wall or glass panel. 7. All trash enclosures shall be constructed per City standard. The design of the trash enclosures shall incorporate the materials, finish, color, and trim used on the buildings. 8. All doors, including roll-up and dock doors, shall match the color of the adjacent wall. 9. All signs are subject to Chapter 17.74 (Sign Regulations for Private Property) of the Development Code and review and approval of the associated Uniform Sign Program DRC2013-00316. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Committee recommend approval and forward the project to the Planning Commission for review and action. Design Review Committee Action: • The Committee accepted the proposal as submitted and recommended approval to the Planning Commission. Members Present: Fletcher, Oaxaca, Granger Staff Planner. Mike Smith • D.E.F.G-67 • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:00 p.m. Mike Smith September 17, 2013 UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM DRC2013-00316—MIG/HOGLE-IRELAND FOR GOODMAN RANCHO SPE, LLC - A request to establish a Uniform Sign Program in conjunction with a proposal to construct two (2) industrial warehouse buildings of 555,664 square feet (Building 1/Phase 1) and 1,033,565 square feet (Building 2/Phase 2) on a property comprised of three (3) parcels with a combined area of 3,255,834 square feet (74.7 acres)which is currently developed with a concrete pipe manufacturing/storage facility (formerly operated by Ameron International) within the Heavy Industrial (HI) District, located at the southwest corner of Arrow Route and Etiwanda Avenue - APN: 0229-131-04, -17, and -25. Related files: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19448, Development Review DRC2013-00155, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00315. Background: The proposed sign program is for a project that will consist of two (2) industrial warehouse buildings of 555,664 square feet (Building 1/Phase 1) and 1,033,565 square feet (Building 2/Phase 2). The combined floor area of all the buildings will be 1,589,229 square feet. No tenants have been specified at this time. The basic layout of each building will be typical for warehouse buildings. The primary(or long) axis for Building 1 will be aligned east to west and the primary axis of Building 2 will be aligned north to south. There will be three(3)potential office areas in each building. These offices could potentially be located at the northwest, northeast, and southwest comers of Building 1, and at the northwest, northeast, and southeast comers of Building 2. • Design Parameters: The program proposes a combination of monument and wall signs. Eight(8)wall signs(identified as B-1) are proposed for the building addresses of each tenant space, while eight (8) wall signs (identified as B-2) are proposed for the purpose of identifying the tenant. All wall signs will be located generally near the respective office areas of the buildings. As the wall signs will be for tenants that are not specified at this time, they are "potential" sign locations. Three (3) monument signs (identified as P-1 and P-2) are proposed to identify the corporate ownership and management of the project site. The "primary" monument sign for this purpose (identified as P-1) will be located at the northeast comer of the site near the intersection of Etiwanda Avenue and Arrow Route. The other two(2)"secondary'monument signs for this purpose (identified as P-2) will be located at the northwest and southeast corners of the project site. An additional two (2) monument signs (identified as T-1) for the purpose of identifying tenants are proposed along Arrow Route and Etiwanda Avenue. The wall signs of the proposed sign program comply with the design and technical standards and guidelines set forth in the Development Code. The wall signs will be constructed of channel letters, reverse channel letters, or push-pin letters. Each potential sign location will have a maximum vertical dimension of 24 inches. The horizontal dimension of each sign location will be limited bythe maximum sign area allowed by the Code which is calculated as two (2)square feet to one(1)linear foot with a maximum of 150 square feet (total) per tenant. Although the monument signs of the proposed sign program comply with the design standards/guidelines of the Development Code, they do not comply with the technical standards of the Development Code. The height of the proposed primary monument sign (P-1) exceeds the maximum allowable height for monument signs in industrial districts. Per Table 17.74.080-1 of the • Development Code, the maximum allowable height of monument signs is eight(8)feet. As sign P-1 is 21 feet in height(including the base),the applicant must reduce its height in order to comply. The D,E,F,G-68 DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTION AGENDA DRC 2013-00316—MIG/HOGLE-IRELAND FOR GOODMAN RANCHO SPE, LLC • September 17, 2013 Page 2 proposed secondary and tenant monument signs(P-2 and T-1)exceed the maximum allowable area for monument signs in industrial districts. Per Table 17.74.080-1 of the Development Code, the maximum allowable area of monument signs(not including the base)is 24 square feet. As signs P-2 have an area of approximately 48 square feet and signs T-1 have an area of approximately 40 square feet, the applicant must reduce the area of the signs in order to comply. The last type of sign (identified as B-4)proposed by the applicant is a roof-top sign on each building. These signs will be painted directly onto the generally flat roof of each building. Staff notes to the Committee that there is no discussion of such signs in the Development Code. Nevertheless, staff believes that these signs will have no significant,aesthetic impact as no actual sign structures will be constructed, and otherwise will not be visible from the ground as they will be screened from view by parapet walls. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Major Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project. Revise the design of the all monument signs to complywith the technical standards, specifically the height of sign P-1 and sign area of signs P-2 and T-1, applicable to monument signs within the industrial districts as described in the Development Code. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the • Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues. None. Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion. 1. The option of channel letters, reverse channel letters, and push-pin letters should be eliminated. Staff recognizes the concept of using channel letters for face illuminated signs, reverse channel letters for halo lighting, and push-pin letters for non-illuminated signs. However, staff believes that all signs should have the same construction under all circumstances to ensure that the design of all signs is uniform. 2. Add a statement indicating that each tenant is limited to a maximum number of three(3)signs (wall and/or monument signs). 3. Add a statement indicating that can or box signs are prohibited. 4. Add a statement indicating that all raceways shall be mounted on the opposite side of the building wall where the sign is installed, i.e. not visible from the exterior of the building. 5. Provide additional information within the proposed sign program that discusses double-line signs and logos and the corresponding technical requirements for both. 6. Revise the proposed sign program to generally state that all "possible sign locations" are limited to the tenant that is within the office area located immediately adjacent to the wall plane • where the sign is attached. D.E.F.G-69 DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTION AGENDA DRC 2013-00316 —MIG/HOGLE-IRELAND FOR GOODMAN RANCHO SPE, LLC September 17, 2013 Page 3 7. The applicant is advised that the addition of any tenants which will warrant additional sign locations orany modifications to the location and physical dimensions of signs and will require an amendment to this Uniform Sign Program for review and approval by the Planning Manager and/or the Design Review Committee. Note: The number of monument signs per street frontage shall comply with Table 17.74.080-1 of the Development Code. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Uniform Sign Program be approved with the corrections/revisions as described above to be verified by staff. The revised sign program incorporating this information and corrections shall be provided prior to forwarding the document to the Planning Commission for review and action. Design Review Committee Action: The Committee accepted the proposal as submitted subject to the revisions/corrections that were described in the Design Review Committee Comments Report and recommended approval to the Planning Commission. In regards to the proposed 21-foot high monument sign located at the southwest comer of the intersection of Arrow Route and Etiwanda Avenue,to address staffs comments that it did not comply with the Table 17.74.080-1 of the Development Code, in particular,the overall height and sign area, the applicant proposed modifying it by separating it into two components. The first component would be a large concrete pillar/column with a height that is similar to the height of the original monument • sign,designed in a manner that was more aesthetic in nature, i.e. an art installation,while still having the presence at the street intersection that the originally proposed monument sign would have had. The art installation would have no text or logos on it. The second component would be a monument sign that fully complied with the Citys design and technical standards/guidelines. Staff added that the art installation and the monument sign would be physically separated by 20 to 30 feet so that the separate purpose of each feature would be obvious and distinct. The Committee accepted this concept and agreed to allow the applicant to develop the design of the art installation with staff. As the applicant was concerned about the time it would take to develop the art installation and the potential delay that it could cause, staff noted to both the Committee and the applicant that it was not necessary to fully resolve all of the aspects of the art installation and have it finalized prior to review by the Planning Commission - the overall project, including the Uniform Sign Program, could be forwarded to the Planning Commission for review and action. The Committee accepted this review timeframe. Members Present: Fletcher, Oaxaca, Granger Staff Planner: Mike Smith • D.F.F.G-70 7o 86.. °. _ I � f s.WiFpELgqItFIl FSIUM E7 IV' ' F#3 Fj7 - LU © [a Gl M Q7 W LDLU E MUMO`Q7fiD ° y����• M W FSI CO Fil _ dr �i®EI]E] ELIF�IE,�7iT] W s "E ',.tc .. s$'-+I.1 } Q b .� - _. '� '�' ,xi '•'ty it IFri g"; tit 1wEs "I_4. :�teJ'l�3 , cc F7 '* v "^ .�•-`c ..�.i� L. - .l' jM _,� :' >• -{ � l.� ..'fit I .++ IIj ' +yfi ._.._�. c.. 1 �Y .IYv--1,x 1 S '��, 91, r 11 i y 4 y _.:j A t t,1-a .^... t j4`sSl.t.`�'*. c � 1�4 ,YT1 $ai+ 'Svl nii ,e' jt�. - ��tr� `r � i i 'F I ,., ���f� .��*p�✓ t�js�-nnk�� s.�'.. w .,� ' sae .. � fi.-.i,,;� S� i•Tw� • . • - _ _ ,��t$1Ct �t�"t,� _ .+� .��i�t�,yh��,_'��+i�'���'�i`r',t� ) ... � �.i,y- _ s, (,{?S i� �..i..I e e • e • a z. Goodman Logistics Center -Tree Information Tree No. Species DBH Height Location 1 Eldarica Pine 23 30 Etiwanda Avenue(Inside of Property) 2 Eldarica Pine 22 35 lEtiwanda Avenue(Inside of Property) 3 Eldarica Pine 20.5 40 Etiwanda Avenue(Inside of Property) 4 Eldarica Pine 18.5 35 Etiwanda Avenue(Inside of Property) 5 Eldarica Pine 17.5 30 Etiwanda Avenue(Inside of Property) 6 Eldarica Pine 14 20 Etiwanda Avenue(Inside of Property) 7 Eldarica Pine 18 40 Etiwanda Avenue(Inside of Property) 8 Eldarica Pine 18.5 15 Etiwanda Avenue(Inside of Property) 9 Eldarica Pine 26 35 Etiwanda Avenue(Inside of Property) 10 Eldarica Pine 17.5 35 Etiwanda Avenue(Inside of Property) 11 Eldarica Pine 11 25 Etiwanda Avenue(Inside of Property) 12 Eldarica Pine 12 25 Etiwanda Avenue(Inside of Property) 13 Eldarica Pine 17.5 30 Etiwanda Avenue(Inside of Property) 14 Eldarica Pine 18 40 Etiwanda Avenue(Inside of Property) 15 Eldarica Pine 21 40 Etiwanda Avenue(Inside of Property) 16 Eldarica Pine 32.5 40 Etiwanda Avenue(Inside of Property) 17 Eldarica Pine 13 30 Etiwanda Avenue(Inside of Property) 18 Eldarica Pine 21 45 Etiwanda Avenue(Inside of Property) 19 Eldarica Pine 32 50 Etiwanda Avenue(Inside of Property) 20 Eldarica Pine 27 25 Etiwanda Avenue(Inside of Property) 21 Eldarica Pine 19.5 45 Etiwanda Avenue(Inside of Property) 22 Eldarica Pine 19 45 Etiwanda Avenue(Inside of Property) 23 Eldarica Pine 22 40 Etiwanda Avenue(Inside of Property) • 24 Eldarica Pine 19 40 Etiwanda Avenue(Inside of Property) 25 Eldarica Pine 14 35 Arrow Route 26 Eldarica Pine 18 35 Arrow Route 27 Eldarica Pine 15.5 35 Arrow Route 28 Eldarica Pine 22.5 35 Arrow Route 29 Eldarica Pine 18 35 Arrow Route 30 Eldarica Pine 19 35 Arrow Route 31 Eldarica Pine 17.5 35 Arrow Route 32 Eldarica Pine 16 35 Arrow Route 33 Eldarica Pine 16 35 Arrow Route 34 Eldarica Pine 18.5 35 Arrow Route 35 Eldarica Pine 18 35 Arrow Route 36 Eldarica Pine 18 35 lArrow Route 37 Eldarica Pine 14.5 35 Arrow Route 38 Eldarica Pine 14 35 Arrow Route 39 Eldarica Pine 16 35 Arrow Route 40 Eldarica Pine 19 35 Arrow Route 41 Eldarica Pine 16 35 Arrow Route D,E,F,G-72 42 Eldarica Pine 14 35 Arrow Route 43 Eldarica Pine 24 35 Arrow Route 44 Mexican Fan Palm N.A. 3 Arrow Route 45 Mexican Fan Palm N.A. 3 Arrow Route 46 Koelreuteria 6 10 Arrow Route 47 California Pepper 13 25 Arrow Route 48 California Pepper 12 25 Arrow Route 49 Eldarica Pine 12 30 Arrow Route SO Koelreuteria 4 10 Arrow Route 51 Koelreuteria 4 10 Arrow Route 52 Koelreuteria 6 10 Arrow Route 53 Koelreuteria 3 8 Arrow Route 54 Koelreuteria 6 10 Arrow Route 55 Koelreuteria 6 10 1 Arrow Route 56 Koelreuteria 5 8 Arrow Route 57 Eldarica Pine 18 35 Arrow Route 58 Eldarica Pine 19 35 Arrow Route 59 Mexican Fan Palm N.A. 3 Arrow Route 60 Mexican Fan Palm N.A. 3 Arrow Route 61 Mexican Fan Palm N.A. 3 Arrow Route 62 Mexican Fan Palm N.A. 3 Arrow Route 63 Eldarica Pine 17.5 30 Arrow Route 64 Eldarica Pine 18 35 Arrow Route 65 Eldarica Pine 16 35 Arrow Route 66 Eldarica Pine 6 10 Arrow Route • 67 Eldarica Pine 10 15 Arrow Route 68 Eldarica Pine 28 35 Arrow Route 69 Eldarica Pine 24 35 Arrow Route 70 Eldarica Pine 30 35 Arrow Route 71 Eldarica Pine 4.5 10 Arrow Route 72 Koelreuteria 6 10 Arrow Route 73 Koeireuteria 6 10 Arrow Route 74 Eldarica Pine 18 35 Arrow Route 75 Eldarica Pine 14 30 Arrow Route 76 Eldarica Pine 18 35 Arrow Route 77 Eldarica Pine 10.5 15 Juneberry Drive(Inside of Property) 78 Eldarica Pine 39.5 40 Juneberry Drive 79 Eldarica Pine 9 15 Juneberry Drive 80 Eldarica Pine 19 40 Juneberry Drive 81 Eldarica Pine 14.5 30 Juneberry Drive 82 Eldarica Pine 18 30 Juneberry Drive 83 Eldarica Pine 21.5 35 Juneberry Drive 84 Eldarica Pine 24 40 Juneberry Drive 85 Eldarica Pine 24 35 Juneberry Drive 86 Eldarica Pine 38 40 Juneberry Drive 87 Eldarica Pine 14 25 Juneberry Drive 88 Eldarica Pine 31 25 Juneberry Drive 89 Eldarica Pine 24 40 Juneberry Drive • D,E,F,G-73 90 Eldarica Pine 19.5 35 Juneberry Drive • 91 Eldarica Pine 19.5 35 Juneberry Drive 92 Eldarica Pine 22 35 Juneberry Drive 93 Eldarica Pine 23 35 Juneberry Drive 94 Eldarica Pine 18 35 Juneberry Drive 95 Eldarica Pine 21 35 Juneberry Drive 96 Eldarica Pine 17.5 40 Juneberry Drive 97 Eldarica Pine 18.5 40 IJuneberry Drive 98 Eldarica Pine 22.5 40 JJuneberry Drive 99 Liquidambar 14 30 Juneberry Drive(Inside of Property) 100 Liquidambar 14 30 Juneberry Drive(Inside of Property) 101 Liquidambar 10 30 Juneberry Drive(Inside of Property) 102 Liquidambar 17 40 Juneberry Drive(Inside of Property) 103 1 Olive 1 18.5 25 Juneberry Drive(Inside of Property) 104 Eucalyptus 29 60 Juneberry Drive(Inside of Property) 105 Eucalyptus 19 60Juneber Drive(Inside of Property) 106 Eucalyptus 18 60 Juneberry Drive(Inside of Property) 107 Mexican Fan Palm 18 25 jInside of property behind two buildings • • D,E,F,G-74 M • • • 00 ,� s,r �.,y3 � a Go ran� Lo . �St csCe ts t a � as € � carna v T • T L Uniform Sign Program Rancho Cucamonga, CA P R O J E C T DI R E C T O R Y T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S Owner: Goodman Rancho SPE,LLC 00 Cover page 18201 Von Kerman Avenue,Suite 1170 01 Table of Contents Irvine CA 92612 02 Sign-Typeface 949-502-3602 03 Sign-Colors 04 City of Rancho Cucamonga Signage Requirements Architect: HPA,Inc. 05 Sign Criteria 18831 Bardeen Avenue,Suite 100 06 Site Plan-Sign Locations Irvine,CA 92612 07 Project Main Monument Signelntlgr 949-863-1770 08 Project Main Monument Sign-Requirements 09 Project Main Monument Sign-Landscape 10 Project Main Monument Sign-Goodman Logo Sky Light Box City City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Project Secondary Monument Sign Planning: 10500 Civic Center Drive 12 Project Secondary Monument Sign-Requirements • Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91730 13 Project Secondary Monument Sign-Landscape Planning Department 14 Freestanding Tenant Sign v 909-477-2750 15 Freestanding Tenant Sign-Requirements 16 Freestanding Tenant Sign-Landscape M 17 Wall Sign-Building Address 8 Tenant Sign-Bldg 1 • .n 18 Wall Sign-Building Address&Tenant Sign-Bldg 2 Gl 19 Wall Sign-Building Address Sign-Requirements I 1.1 20 Wall Sign-Building Tenant Sign-Requirements 01 21 Roof Sign r • • • • NOTE: PERSUANT TO SECTION 17.74 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA DEVELOPMENT CODE,A SIGN PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR THE PLACEMENT OF SIGNS. Page 01 T Y P E F A C E Helvetica Neue abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz+ Helvetica This isABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ This is the preferred typeface and weight for all possible 123456789 a.�a communications. Helvetica Neue 55 Roman , v • T Helvetica Neue 75 Bold abcdefghijkimnopgrstuvwxyz+ I This is only used for occasional �• 14 highlighting. ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ 123456789 ' HeM4t4a,N%*75 Sold ' Helvetica Neue 45 Light abcdefghijklmnopgrstuvwxyz+ This is only used in extreme situations ABCDEFGHIJKLM NOPQRSTUVWXYZ when the versatility of a lighter weight is crucial to the design. 123456789 HeNKics Neue 45 tight Page 02 C O L O R S FINISHES SCHEDULE SWATCH DESCRIPTION COLOR CODE 2 PACK PAINT VINYL(OPAQUE) ��ertw 1' ® SILVER WA Pi FINISH:2 PACK POLYURETHANE SATIN V1 WA COLOR:TO MATCH DIBOND SILVER METALLIC cu ALUMINIUM FINISH(TBC). • • 22' . GREEN PMS 369 C P2 FINISH:2 PACK POLYURETHANE SEMI GLOSS V2 AVERY 900 SUPER CAST co COLOR:TO MATCH PMS 369 C AVERY 956 v T • T ?' ■ GREY PMS 46 C P3 FINISH:2 PACK POLYURETHANE SEMI GLOSS V3 AVERY 900 SUPER CAST COLOR:TO MATCH PMS 446 C AVERY 962 M V e 00 WHITE NIA P{ FINISH:2 PACK POLYURETHANE SEMI GLOSS V3 AVERY 900 SUPER CAST ' COLOR:WHITE AVERY 900 s; ■ BLACK WA PS FINISH:2 PACK POLYURETHANE SEMI GLOSS V3 AVERY 900 SUPER CAST • COLOR:BLACK AVERY901 co • • • Page 03 eBuoweono 000 bod eu . . . Apo to !,} •!, 1111 } ' ! ,1 1 u i , i I i , ,4 rn Ir } 15 '{. '! {1 i ! ,I 141 1111 e• Il ! ! 1,1 1, •fii 111:4444 i i i' t i; , , 1 111.'1 1 !•! f, f!!I i! ! IjI' Oil I„( !Ili, ,' i 1,.1 11 r, r!.�t , III; Ifni j �y I It +4 i� i�i !� �: F!I�{i ! ! 114�4�1,{ ! j il�iy11 j i!,r( ?h!!� !I 1 4 I if i�! !, ,! 1111 !i{ +'!!`I I!}!I ) 1+; t, I I l s l 114';.1(' ',}{ I,I d,Ill ! d! Ir r t Il , ! (! ,t It ! I,I [l(!• i t 111}•j i t {!ie!i'III• Ii II'It Irl�1 i I I{ell ,1i411littl �. I t „i. , tl H',i' t•1 I l}r it -"2 I t' �I I ;1 n I i!NI; 'i I}I it , '� 1 ii+ { i' ` lf!iil + , ')'"'! ill 1111 j I.. 1 '� �I,+ L,. I• II I! ,I„i II' 1 p , • t r 1,11, 1 , 11111 1111 II, hq:, I , 14 I � Iil 1 ( I 1( 'I L NVqIiIIIuI I 19,Hi9,14 1.11.4.1 '!�!)}.GI dI I�I"1 I!TII IIII'III. �{INuiil'•rl i 1I 1 ti{}l IIiI!r �I a1,' ' i(tlK•iI r' !d1,! tI l;j!.!I, II 1'4 1111H11•; ,I}I 4lllili ', il,l IIII !Iijlll'411ir1!IIl!{. r. Il1�liII�I III dll d'J�_IlI11Il, I �IIIIISh: 1 !!!I' II {{}! ti,llll!li 41 , r I` 'itr 1144.` � 111) 41.11 !l{Ild lu4 x ll!�'Ill,�lltill4 _!. . !9,l 11'1 lir I• 11 I , 1 I r• t , r,)!; I , „ ,; i , 11 [,111 ,=1;! f !IIlf . ii !1 ` � '! Il 'r; I Orli! ir !J' { t ; ! I I , i•iiil'' 1 ! { 11. 1 1 1 111 1 !, I•I ,1 I'I 4' 111 I , 1 ii I ilii' !'1±1)illi }1114' r '�ii ti! ! 1111.!1111 'I}I i N{ jl l !Ill I�i 11!J{l' �F } p III i I '1111 i (i till kr" 'I i ',I }} ( l I I 1 1•,11,11, ! F !Itll :I Ill i It 4111;4[it i},n9, [{I It If Ir , Ir; I,[!r l!j'{f 1111 yqj' t9,:I ,I;1 };,.( 11'11 t!r•1{l, i IP It! 1111 Ir(II d r ,'; } I l'I II !I i., ,1 k ii'+1 111111 I!1 Ilr}!, ;I �!Itltt'i1 111111 4114 ,,f1!. 14•,' ' iln jI}! I , rilll'lEil 11 ii! IIIt,; i , 14 ,tlt!a{ u 1 t9, 1 r !•[, , 4! 1 I ►,;,; , , , ! l I' f,1111 r 111 III{ ' liJ if •I 44411► ' 'i I'Ill,{�1rJ + ly 11 r'vl!) ' y l'„s II I:I '17 i. P. r} , II'1'Itgd II • 1, ,111!)n=11 } !, !!}II{ (111 114 a 1 11 .La L.I�. III rJl t 1111 H}I t[I. !r 1.4444 II},! d,,,, d,lM IJ Ill! 1114(14 I. ill it(, , Ir1. . 1144. !. IIIt. 1 L 4414144 edt�Ir. I• Ir 1111 ;9,l ii I i 1' II R { E 4114' t„ i I Ilii I ! I Ir41tr4ill Rill4114 111 II! 1 i 14111! iii} ! if i 1 t' 1 1 } 1 ! I }! ' I II 1411 i! 1 ' l I I'I t is ': II I VIII i ! I,Ii{I' t Irij i{ 1111 },! f f! 1111 ,1 ( ! i ',i 1 1111 It•,,, ! I glli'�1111'1 c g It lt, t f , ' r l f"' '(' ! 1 It l �(� � I} fl I i• ! I j}, I 1 ,, Ir, u, 1t •hly. :;it;!,! ' 1111 l 1 , !I ml;I 1•, 1 it'1111 I I},:Ill ' " 4444 , ! I 1,1 ;•L; 1111 l d 'I 1 Ijl 1 1 1 !• (i 1, 14 t I {I j �( , d in 1111} t 11111 , I I,i1' { I }f h,, 1;(4e 171 Irl i Itl 11111 Ii{4 1111 } „' r!t 111114 Ill E lijl! if !I!:.!r;rltl I i RI I 1 4111 Itil JIM 1111 4111 t.,l,Il,.tl I f i� ! I) I+j illi)tail I i!Ijli I.li i 111 I I 14 a Ill 4:!. }t41Jr . I I it' ,1 1 lI 11114 d:{aIG Id.11 d JLI.al t9,, ; 1)Htllllilll - ,Irl!}Illi� {:11444 I .i ' n I 1 !-'III if)I Ia , , I r•!1 I ! l ;!} !.r tttd �i 11,11 I if , 1, ,a It; {1114 r f j 14,11 Ile },i ,d ui III!4 II 1, 1�1 II Irl; ' I '11 'I ! ll 1141; I ; 11 I I I'q 1 if! 11111:1(! 11141}; I}Ir 41111 Ill,114114 i, i,I! Ir} 1444 I•,ta,{I I.I 1114 11111111 {rd' I!f{., it 1t 1111 ii h1,. , 1, { tot 11 1!' Ir[ I r I it!t9, 1 t'!1 }!" } nrl( I 9,i{i, ;14}!11 Nr1 l It't'r Iklj fill 111!1 I'I 41' '•t II I'!9, 1}d r 1 1! I LI, !1 f , I , II}.r (.' , Ij r t I e. 1} a• t I , } t ,11.1 f 11111• Irl l ,!{I 1 FI,,r !,i ,,r I,P I"I t•I! 1!11' r,1111 11111 j9,. I ,1 I, ! ! a1i 1''11111"1111/[l(j,, Id II Ils, it , t , 1,1 1 ! i I I I.I I!I 'r It ,,11 „.}, Irl .1 . 6 I 1 r ' If., „I ! 'Hi•, ,,M r ,' Ir n „ ! i ,1 it Iu , 1111 f Il i-' ,11,11 IIIIII 1I!a n, . I 1 p 't!j . { t ,I I' lllal,1"II I)I 1' '1111 i 11411 ! 19,j,9,l:,1114,•t 4411;4 I, 111 It•i i 1 1 t:! (I ill,!•1 Il:rl II' 1 }Id ,'r:r t,l lra l ! y l'! [I r,9,1,1 1.11.1 t, 111•I f.`l! `I ' 1 I'll 11,:111.1 I , I'i I N 1 I { 9, } l 1• J i", t, I. !fll ! 1111 i !r. ii I l h .111411111.11 ; L. ,• t•41)111,114- 1;!I I ,, 11 HIR 1' JLt{,:all Id 1 I !iilli Iiillh 1111111 Illi 111411111!1 11 ill 1!I I. t I; 111'1441111 t 11'61 w 1,Ilfl I!+,I Il 11,11a 11111 4 111 11{t 11 i . 1164 Illl I- !1it11. td- 4hili if I- I 1 1 { 11+j!, 4;4 til( i, ,[,;• 111 , t ,I'9, Iq .1!,1Fe, 9,l ; • I II,! ; 1911. t4lr; , r 4 i! 11 1 11 111111 �, I ,111.114 I.1 I( 1!I+1' I i 1 4'I I} {4: r (' 11!1 crit 1111 1111 'I 114 1111 11.11 I d 1;,;, I l 11 ; 1 Ir• t• 1 114,1411 I I 1 ( Ili r, 9,l 1' it }1111 I [i q 1 14!1 ,•1 III .1;111 f 1 '4, 1 Ili 1111 111, all 1 1. {I 1 1 {14 l' I l i1, I ! I, 1 ( , 1 1' 4 } II r1l ILII j 1 1 l I 1 9, l E , le, rt l I' I I !r Id,g,lt Gt 1114 !ll' } Il 1' }. 111 ! 1 I . Izll�•1 I It111 ' �4 411111 1 tl l II I{1111 1 !1 1 •!}illi tl Ir 1 , ! 11 }n 11111 Il 1 1. 1 a I' 17'1+ l J1Il4ll, rt! ;,':111' �' I ! ! 111 `:4• Bil11) .t l 4 1, 1141 1 1111 t!1 t G 14: 11 ' , 4 . :9, 11 Ili 1111 141111 Ili , .il3llifl;llrl [_ I(i���1Y,��I!I!Il 3� 4; i Ili l�i! rrlllili,li!li:l ll it 9 !;;i . . . . . I . (Y Itl'IIIrS' $ ; 1114 " 1444!411!1!}I SIGN CRITERIA BUILDING 1 (563.601 SO,FT.) ® ® "Kill Gal 47III fillet 8 Project Main Project Secondary Freestanding Bldg.Address Bldg.Tenant Building BUILDING 2(1.033,565 so.FT.) Monument Sign Monument Sign Tenant Sign Wall Sign Wall Sign Roof Sign SIGN WIDTH 6 ft. 6 ft. 6 ft. Proportion to Typeface ht. 300 ft. I ervA. SIGN HEIGHT (Not including base) (Not including base) (Not including base) min.1 ft./max.2 ft. min.1 ft.I max.2 ft. 300 ft. SIGN AREA 24 ft.approx. 24 sf.ft.approx. 24 sf.ft.approx. 2 sf:1 if,max. 90,000 sq.ft. 150 sf.per bldg. per bldg. • COLORS Goodman Std. Goodman Std. Goodman Std. Goodman Std. Tenant Custom Goodman Std. • LOGO(GRAPHICS) Goodman Logorrypeface Goodman Logorrypeface Goodman Logo/typeface Goodman Logorlypeface Tenant LegorTypeface Goodman Logo/Typeface SIGN STYLE Freestanding ! Freestanding Freestanding Goodman Std.Typeface Tenant Logo/Typeface Surface Painted NO.of SIGNS 2 total 2 total 2 total 8 total 8 total 2 total • !'Tt (1 facing Edwanda Ave.) (1 for Building#1) (1 for Building#1) (4 for Buildi #1 ?7 (1 faring Avow Route) (1 for Building#2) (1 for Building#2 4 for Building#2) (4 for Building#1) (1 for Building#1) 9 ) ( ng ) (4 for Building#2) (1 for Building 42) I ' 0 r CD • co • Page 05 P-' R =1 R",I R'_ R'- HPt 1 oil Y . llntuu 3■1y��y �y y LLp , �i� 7 ,v R _ _ q a hb� P i t 7 SE NAM PANm *11M.. . 11 R ' ? 10911 11 } d c to ' ! co f i P4� t m sl�n�ocaoYv��e�nm & T'yd r C �'jid' 1101Iilill rtllll llll 1, lpllllt,l4glllllll U,4lallllJill y1141, R9 �I I t my �noav <rrr.:�9>�t�r 7 .niiu ao • t� WPZOro9*� 9 U � Um c U � m o c a` P-i 0 Signs Allowed at Location: Monument Sign: General Standard.All sites shall be limited to a maximum of one sign type,i.e.; The maximum height of a free standing sign$hall not exceed eight(8)feet. Excluding Note:All signs shall conform to the county/city requirements in which the The maximum surface area of a freestanding sign shall not exceed twerdyfour(24) project is located square fest Excluding base. Malarial: Individual cul out numbers tabdrated from 1-112 inch foam. One sign per street frontage. Quantities: One per site area Monument Sign Color: Typeface: All Typeface will meet within the Goodman Logo std. Sea Color Schedule for details. Helvetica Ne (use He ca 65 Roman weight) Color: contrasting a ■ ColoTo be painted i co n ntrastingtingDolor to We building within Goodman Logo std.colors Lighting: Combination of Non-illumination&illumination types, �� s ? CaKle. TM GooCman ;5':e W C—% Yitwe Apptl W nak� �m:Fnise. Y<.RP1Lx - ft"wM rwSFEttax+iw iam ra«ro EWMOwa Smwm. Rxtl maw PMs%8 Ew-sb55 VJ.nwr a00 Typeface Illumination in:Routed Pushed Through Cop cNrx so,o,+ou,sr wwwa sw cm Size: min.6 inch ht.linea. 12 inch high address letter M. ace na,rra,z$ xww ww • (Final location to be approved by Fire Oepanment) P4 FINISH:2 PACK POLYURETHANE SEMI GLOSS V3 AVERY 900 SUPER CAST 0 Artwork Monumentation: COLOR:WHITE AVERY 900 T • T ODI W —;S painted concrete r illuminated Goodman Logo Light box • • Fu (10 � . � • • • Side View Page 08 --------- - - -- ----- -- --- H RN vm'R L t w I „ r x F ,t O _ / r eY 'Yf� 'G'V tl'Y♦ er'� ' � U D ��00 �^ '�'v3�3�tldlah�<�Jw sy �'�'��,�e� •R_ � c� (0 , liQEl m N M a- V a Goodman logo sky lightbox specifications Figure 1 - Logo+symbol(Figure 2) Sign case(Figure 1) Material:Fabricated opal acrylic face. Material Fabricated aluminium sign case. ---------- +Fabricated aluminium support frame. +Flexface extrusion with self tensioning banner system. Finish:Aluminium support frame. +Structural design of supporting frame to local ]--- +Retums paint finished in two pack polyurethane to Engineers specifications. n. � —i match corporate colours. Finish:Two pack polyurethane paint. +All internal surfaces painted white. +To match corporate colour. +Fabricated opal acrylic face laminated with translucent vinyl film. �°y1Of +All internal surfaces painted white. +Film colour Avery Yellow Green 5562 QM Illumination:Tridonic Atco LEDs. +Returns are painted to match support frame. •Tridonic Crystal Premium P560 Modula € +Tridonic LCU 150/12 D010 Converter. Illumination:Tridonic Atco LEDs. All electrical work to comply with local statutory •.m.mwuu..;>uw • requirements. Figure 2 `Converters are serviceable items and should be _ D installed remotely For ease of access. I M ss • T 'Note:Tridonic Atco specifications regarding maximum • R placement distances to prevent voltage drop. 00 Flexface face Material:Backlit Flexface PVC. r +Fixed to sign case extrusion by appropriate method. +Typically this is via rope sawn into the edge of the PVC r banner. �r i Finish:Translucent vinyl film. +Laminated to face of Flexface PVC. , +Colour Avery Yellow Green 5562 QM I • • T The Goodman lettering is cut out of film allowing it to '" �... .. ... .... .... ......... ....._ .. illuminate white. `See following page for application detail. ` Installation - A thorough inspection of the site should be done to assess the most appropriate installation method.Signs • • � may be installed from the ground via crane and access _ equipment or from the rooftop via direct or rope access. -=7 - Consult with local authorities to ensure compliance with n engineering and other statutory requirements as well as health and safety requirements. Page 10 H� M c 0 E m U 7 � U 0 s U C f9 c i m N � C c N E U c U P-2 Signs Allowed at Location: Monument Sign: General Standard.All sites shall be limited to a maximum of one sign type.i.e.; The maximum height of a free-scantling sign shall not exceed bur(4)feat. Excluding Base. The maximum surface area of a free-standing sign shall not exceed forty-eight(48)square feet. Note:All signs shall conform to the county/city requirements in which the project is located. Excluding Base. Material: seeiegend Monument Sign Color. Quantities: Two(2) See Color Schedule for details. Typeface: All Typeface will meet within the Goodman Logo std. Helvetica Neue(use Helvetica 55 Roman weight) Color: To be painted in Contrasting color to the building within Goodman Logo aid.colors Lighting: Non-illumination Size: min.6 inch ht./max.12 inch high address letter ht. (Final location to be approved by Fire Department) to• LEGEND FACE(FRONT AND BACK PANELS) :T ��—"-FACE PANEL 3mm ACM SHEET • T STEEL FABRICATED HOT DW GRLVMIISED FINISH:P1 ANCHOR POSTS Iym � �He %� RETURNS AND TOP CAPr 00 4ADO50aB BASE PLATE 3mm ALUMINIUM SHEET , e V / MAIN ALUMINIUM FABRICATED FRAME FINISH:Pt 5N5003M5 r % MhSme AHOLD TO ANC LOGO HICK ACOUARE AND EQUI FIXING BOLTED TO ANCHOR Posts ISmm THICK ACRVLOX OR EQUIVALENT NOTE:NYLON WASHERS AND OM VHB WE PRECOLOURED ACRYLIC MATERIAL F )TCo. (011 EQUIVALENT) LOGO PANEL PIN FIXED TO CLADOING TO ENSURE TO BE USED TO AVOID CONTACT BETWEEN MAXIMUM ADHESION INCOMPATIBLE METALS FINISH:A2 IZ LOGO TEXT TEXT LOGO PANEL SQUARE fimm THICK CLEAR ACRYLIC LASER CUT • LOGO TEXT PIN FIXED TO LOGO PANEL TO ENSURE mI • • • MAXIMUM ADHESION FINISH:P4 ' LOGO TEXT SKIRTING PANEL 3mm ACM SHEET • FINISH:P5 • /.�SKIRTING PANEL CT • ALUMINIUM FABRICATED FRAME TEXT A/ Wx50v165H9 COMPUTER CUT VINYL FIXING TEN SCREW TO ANCHOR POSTS FONT:HELVETICANEUE FRAIETOBEINSTALLYDPRORTOMMNFIbwiE COLOUR:V3 INSTALLATION Page 12 E-2 q9 Planting Legend �- III 11�j�l +ra' , ti1d�iaf1 TPEE9 ! �Jl I Illi'I�� 51.EM1 BOTNI1GLLlYNYOMNN 513E QTY YN S EEYMN9 cluxMiLmNT, Wift 9 Y YW • r Y A 1 ® L•YL9ATl1Mu•ru Nloo 6 Y Mq CYW\Y•1 / O FFwn•uvle N9b Y) L Fr F pnJCrw nmo .Y10o 1 ,••.. CYbnY19Y�r LL 1Bo 1• �•i611i1� N1b N L � ! • �9Fan1 FnY ' ® TWiMmM • NYG,•1Y tAfr N L O• Q•Y�8urN4 N9Eo Y L v T `ni Ywu9s Mom% SOTN11GLYL0YYmm Ws W S _ Ib O wm11\'Gix�I Cb AW L a 00 Tus\P•qe p Nmm•Y1u\•\'irf�n Bl ma L om+r p SMxn n•°°I ma L ae.•,1s•9 O �•^^•`•^•'"Yti°• mY. LB„EB Plan View with Landscape FY ry W ' Q Fab1.Wi•i mM Y 9YYBQ1 BOLIJYI'KYLp1Y]MM WE SIM(:INp WLCfL9 9CdO:N.T4. a .y1�,r1 MY.r1tY.B 110• B10GL .11" .10C L �.., THtmrl•gmO\\!lh•narlAYr O O EE•rl•"•� Afy L • CgaY1Br O TOwNr ME .'�.'.'. P•ns.win11m61 Bun I1CY MGG L •'�� 'NEEM LY\9nry.FOM\pe O E .1CCENT! Lu0YY1,n\'GW\Ru 1\GF N'10.0 l NOTES. CO E lYNBOl1 BJLIJIIGLYCWYCNIHI, WE WJ=3 '�,' WYxi1.1Yn 1T\NL\1PEE91WITIWISOSNNWXliPe6HNl\BE\IM•\ELNWE 'MMU EFt O �•� AE} L p•ryygl•\'6WYY 1\Cw yIOL L 2k%f 11M.TOB1lq W5TNLICONCNETE1Yg WWBET MP • O Fonabl0m OMVEI\MFA618Efl RIMW010E1N119 • • Mm•lnnemm AO. L S1\KL1PU1lIEMM Ta FsUr Mn. YEEEMEEEOYYI B BYw B�rMI.\e 'Vivhr, TO• ,1110.E L 1N11-t Y! O OnNvm\Ywr mq L `mBBY`NCMm• 111TXE9E\ftNISIWLL1CpBLY\WIIMTXEILIIY9\\W.TEM EF£IGENT OrrllSWo OROYMHCEIBU p IlnnrMwlwmb mW L �m•�•T• 1\fr N10C L !.\\STBEET1PEEs\WEICCNCEP1WL10NLYIANG WLL18FY1$ iM�Yui APPNVrLB 91PEET YWBOVEYENIIRA p M1nNUNm1e1'MnW m(I• L T.•Fm,elAtls 5Mf N g IN.WL IEMWT P�l FwrvaACrr �•�••'m• WN91:9FE1PLW51 LOYPLY\WIIMCRYINNTERI EFF LNICffiYPe MOPNNCfl B1 Page 13 .d � § �amm age a c n r �eb c«e_ga \ > \ � • Signs Allowed at Location: Monument Sign: General Standard.All sites shall be limited to a maximum of one sign type,i.e.; The maximum height of a free-standing sign shall not exceed four(20)feet. Excluding base. The maximum surface area of a free-standing sign shall not exceed twenty-four(24) Note:All signs shall conform to the county/city requirements in which the project is located, square feat. Excluding bass. Material: see legend Monument Sign Color. Quantities: Two(2) See Color Schedule for details. Typeface: All Typeface will meet within the Goodman Logo std. HelveDca Neue(use Helvetica 55 Roman weight) Color: To be painted in contrasting color to the building within Goodman Logo std.colors Lighting: Non-illumination Size: min.6 inch in./max. 72 inch high address loner ht. (Final location to be approved by Fire Department) • LEGEND Q FACE(FRONT AND BACK PANELS) Ill - 3mm ACM SHEET FINISH:P1 • T RETURNS AND TOP CAP I FACE PANEL 3mm ALUMINIUM SHEET r tp STEEL FABNCATED NOT DW OALVANtSED FINISH:P1 a O LOGO PANEL SQUARE " OflP M t0Dx1BLLNnm sNs LOGO PANEL SQUARE AND r /r LOGO TEXT 1 gOLE pub igmm THICK ACRYLOX OR EQUIVALENT / PRECOLOURED ACRYLIC MATERIAL MAW ALUMINIUM FAORICATED FRAME / WA sNs LOGO PANEL PIN FIXED TO CLADDING TO ENSURE / Sei 6ANGIEBRAC s MAXIMUM ADHESION RXING BOLTED TO ANCH17fl P S FINISH:A2 NOTE:NYLON WASHERS AND SM Me TAPE (OR EOUNALENT) LOGO TEXT TODEUSEDTGAVOIDCONTACTBE 14 emm THICK CLEAR ACRYUC LASER CUT • INCOMPATIBLE ME ALR LOGO TEXT PIN FIXED TO LOGO PANEL TO ENSURE • MAXIMUM ADHESION TENANT LOGO FINISH:Pa / SKIRTING PANEL F 3mm ACM SHEET SKIRTING PANEL FINISH:P5 ' ALUMINW FAwLLATEO FRAME TEXT • COMPUTER CUT VINYL FI%W6 TErc SCREW TO ANCHDfiPQ91S FONT:HELVETICA NEUE FRAME TO BE INSTAl1E0 PWORTO MAM FNAME INSTALLATIDN COLOUR:V3 Front View Page 15 Planting Legend iXEES SYNSOL\ SOTNIIC OMMOMNA 512E QW IWOCms 1PFAMNNS ah ki9B7 �,1 ]E�ee ] M LYN CYnMIFWM1Tl ® RL�BO B N ^ LMa�FvOsm�\l'MUYme MW CnFa\MFN Ogmil Mrc U1. 147 L AMuM M gtlawa\nonm CYYnIN\SNnv 74'\60 12 M 14Y L 241 O L Mue\brce o ], • AMVJ dImL • ® iWmrvtl mnbrt 1StL M l BriMIM1 BO O DYMMIMSReeSTI 241W b L 0 T • T "Um i E SYMBOl1 BOTNIMILVCCMMOMNA 91LE WUCOLS S Q Lr liWwYLI' n\Ch L a J T.Ro Q BpylNdYu�e\Tuon\BI SC» L L Plan View with Landscape wb\m e AUYmn151y sfr L $Gln'.N.T.S. O SEMa\nhmbdM Sw L F�mw\tom MaaouXocoT FbulFeYwWn SYMBCLI BOT.VUCILKOMMOM IN WE SPACNIG YNLOL9 pL.ypggF\GYv SOn YOtOC L TRW O A y� ]J1'1wFInP�m!\\T MYm1mwIM► tlaM1rnwlw IWYaY SG L �:•'`••:• , '�'' ' FARM • TO BnWWb1eLLX nw ]]TO.0 L • CRpW1Su O neww L��^ ^ItYJY\&nn 1\(iF Moc L LNN aN.Ir\FRWrx\a O b\MNiRN b ACCENTS LmWu m.•GeNflu NOTES' Y yIOG SYMBq.I BOiN4CK4COMMONI NO SIZE WUCIXS ' ', YY»11WSn 111KL1111EES WRXW.51pgiVAOSGFe 9FV11\BF IMNSIWYf NOOIBMNIEA. • ObnhllmlXon Sfy Lim pNbbNUMaI'pilnW 110, ]0100 L 01\CONIMCTOM1011NSTALLI CONCREhI MOLNG1FSlBETWEEM PLW • Ainw° PaFYM1� OMVEL\MFA4.I SFFNIHTNO\pfTNL\9 • O �'ry\�A1tl°Y" AGS L gM AOw Bp[IMmnl of Pimb� 11 IL r%o.0 L (MI LL O WSNron\Wwbr ]I� L W^ 1n4Yn� A\lTME5E1q.W51 WILL\CCMPLY\WIIIM1INe Cf1Y5\WATFFEGFIGENT p�05pm ONgXMR Im +® Sfr L erg- 11G N\OC L 0.1151NF£IIiPEESARfl CONCEVfWl10FKY\ANDI WILL13E11N3 XeaosWxlo�nM ' �Yus APPNOVe118iNEET IWNOYEMENTRA 0 RnnMuml t\'(MiYiW SCL L X iYl.im�1'Nnb e" oNOIW.M NMWT F.1 LANOSGPE\g MCd K0. MTMCIM EMEFF W06f/JE\OflotlU110E\!i ' Page 16 iAwlHPA N3 d 4 «whFY.-. ISna NaN..n Awmv .Ylltl t ?, X h F..• Xn1. IIx 77, 4 _ „ sol, -_...�...,..'F+.� t`Y ia� 'hV®iX CM AN cu $! , a t{.a� l..„,„a#^t....v..!_.. ' �+---.>rw ,-._.. s a xs_,,Ri ks..��..ii is _ -• z s,�"7 't' O B 2 g_2 coo _ s Tt ?y�r'yk x 'r” 3 I ���������� r 'y'"`bn �..'��` 3 +fir'e�" a • c L «y 7y777 � { U m Pi 00i � y ikl.E5�5qe4 �. a u.rv �� B-2 HPA 5- iT'r�l, r•'.. ���� ^ (bell 11 .4 A.�vw I ry, 'Y•t U fig W 'LINA s�, ;F•' •w�fi��,�� k5:� rY �' e3 t e�a"r al, E•Y,�r" :,rt., .. aoao o o� o' o� • S q _ 9 C N� LL ^L W U N U � Arrow Route ti to Plan View Rendering Y :. n PIAS W9 Ir `� { d i•2CMYK W,O. I�'i'RGB > J 3 > C v y) d Y 10 McIlch ri Zi i V a Front View Side View it • STAFF REPORT PUNNING DEPARTMENT 1 RANCHO C,UCAMONGA DATE: October 23, 2013 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Candyce Burnett, Planning Manager BY: Mike Smith, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19448 - MIG/HOGLE-IRELAND FOR GOODMAN RANCHO SPE, LLC: A review of a tentative parcel map in conjunction with a proposal to construct two (2) industrial warehouse buildings of 555,664 square feet (Building 1/Phase 1) and 1,033,565 square feet (Building 2/Phase 2) on a property comprised of three (3) parcels with a combined area of 3,255,834 square feet (74.7 acres) which is currently developed with a concrete pipe manufacturing/storage facility (operated by Ameron International) in the Heavy Industrial (HI) District located at the southwest comer of Arrow Route and Etiwanda Avenue; APNs: 0229-131-04, -17, and -25. Related files: Development Review DRC2013- 00155, Tree Removal Permit ORC2013-00315, and Uniform Sign Program DRC2013- 00316. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. • ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00155 - MIG/HOGLE-IRELAND FOR GOODMAN RANCHO SPE, LLC: A review of a proposal to construct two (2) industrial warehouse buildings of 555,664 square feet (Building 1/Phase 1) and 1,033,565 square feet (Building 2/Phase 2) on a property comprised of three (3) parcels with a combined area of 3,255,834 square feet (74.7 acres) which is currently developed with a concrete pipe manufacturing/storage facility (operated by Ameron International) in the Heavy Industrial (HI) District located at the southwest comer of Arrow Route and Etiwanda Avenue; APNs: 0229-131-04, -17, and -25. Related files: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19448, Tree Removal Permit DRC2013- 00315, and Uniform Sign Program DRC2013-00316. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2013-00315 - MIG/HOGLE-IRELAND FOR GOODMAN RANCHO SPE, LLC: A request to remove trees in conjunction with a proposal to construct two (2) industrial warehouse buildings of 555,664 square feet (Building 1/Phase 1) and 1,033,565 square feet (Building 2/Phase 2) on a property comprised of three (3) parcels with a combined area of 3,255,834 square feet (74.7 acres) which is currently developed with a concrete pipe manufacturing/storage facility (operated by Ameron International) in the Heavy Industrial (HI) District located at the southwest corner of Arrow Route and Etiwanda Avenue; APNs: 0229-131-04, -17, and -25. Related files: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19448, Development Review DRC2013- 00155, and Uniform Sign Program DRC2013-00316. UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM DRC2013-00316 - MIG/HOGLE-IRELAND FOR GOODMAN RANCHO SPE, LLC: A request to establish a Uniform Sign Program in conjunction with a proposal to construct two (2) industrial warehouse buildings of • 555,664 square feet (Building 1/Phase. 1) and 1,033,565 square feet (Building 2/Phase 2) on a property comprised of three (3) parcels with a combined area of 3.255,834 EXHIBIT U D,E,F,G-94 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM19448, DRC2013-00155; DRC2013-00315, DRC2013-00316 -MIG/HOGLE-IRELAND • FOR GOODMAN RANCHO SPE, LLC October 23, 2013 Page 2 square feet (74.7 acres) which is currently developed with a concrete pipe manufacturing/storage facility(operated by Ameron International) in the Heavy Industrial (HI) District located at the southwest corner of Arrow Route and Etiwanda Avenue; APNs: 0229-131-04, -17, and -25. Related files: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19448, Development Review DRC2013-00155 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00315 These applications were originally scheduled for review and action,by the Planning Commission on October 23, 2013 and are now scheduled for hearing at the November 13, 2013 meeting. The rescheduling is because there was a technical error in the public notification process. The number of posted notices on the subject property was not in compliance with Section 17.14.050(8)(4) of the Development Code. At the direction of the Assistant City Attorney, the public hearing for these applications must be re-advertised with new mailed notices, postings, and newspaper advertising. The notification period for the re-advertised public hearing is 10 days. Therefore, the Planning Commission public hearing for these applications has been scheduled for November 13, 2013. Respectfu submitted, Candyce • Planning Manager CB:MS/Is • D,E,F,G-95 r City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Mitigated Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: SUBTPM19448 AND DRC2013-00155 Public Review Period Closes: November 13, 2013 Project Name: Project Applicant: Pam Steele MIG/Hogle- Ireland Project Location (also see attached map): Located at the southwest corner of Arrow Route and Etiwanda Avenue - APN: 0229-131-04, -17, and -25. Related files: Development Review DRC2013-00155, Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00315, and Uniform Sign Program DRC2013-00316. Project Description: A review of a tentative parcel map in conjunction with a proposal to construct two (2) industrial warehouse buildings of 555,664 square feet(Building 1/Phase 1) and 1,033,565 square feet(Building 2/Phase 2)on a property comprised of three(3)parcels with a combined area of 3,255,834 square feet (74.7 acres) which is currently developed with a concrete pipe manufacturing/storage facility (formerly operated by Ameron International) within the Heavy Industrial (HI) District. • FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga,acting as the lead agency,has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Mitigated Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but: (1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project, as revised, may have a significant effect on the environment. If adopted,the Mitigated Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Reportwill not be required. The factual and analytical basis for this finding is included In the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909)477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration during the • review period. November 13. 2013 nates of Determination Adopted By EXHIBIT V D,E,F,G-96 f \ �/�/�/� � DIIASTI ODUAOF^NOLE °"`�•' ELM � STATE OF CAUFOPNIA if iE aFFIFa f Wr DwnFir�wi Of VATEP nlwuPC£S vn . . v(iP RAPHICI .S `. n . t Project Site "t SS 3 'f. y Win` . -� ` `I ^•.�, ,. Scale 1:24,000 it 1,jig VA; - e - ait 21 ,c�o�—r —��� , �' � ..\I y..:�✓r v:r �� is E?;. jff " .•fsA a , ;� x k`+—ti':f :t �y �`..\�]. y .r, \�_/_�` •�^F'i.. 1 • . 1_�\ 4✓1.'� .. IiS.' as /... - "�1 •^° µ � _ ��_. __ _�'A ,,, _ ' 1 l •j {j -. 'Y �.,IPOVTANA t � ,_ I � � . 1 J i I I ®III ��'� I � W. 4—•'_i • 1. ,, � .. / ....j :' n i �, 1 1 1 ._ .• � l- :I . .a _ lF1 Y sir- Y lu-...._vnni, j - .__._... r nl. wr'•� �:�. uO11A8T.CALIF. r:w xnwi.uw.,..,•:.:.s..mµs N r.......:..:.....s...pn..•...: m •wv cervi:oor:.c:w.n v.wav•..r�o- wr,.n:�:ss'.ue.. D,E,F,G-97 *z a "' G1. A A . �` P "��. l .�"--IJrO-�.f`� pp l�Mf�.._. • — 22 ' .. � l .�..� ... �. J,Jit :: Y lam" ■ Nb O\` VN u �•" k 11 % ' Project Site ^-_—_� � .m � ..,_.... _jam-- "".. A �--i✓\._..� `� /, •. S !'r xxa MO f 9V IF —.'�i':ir— d l 9 Pv, FEET 151 91.Y J , f • ++n J _ II2 rtTT _ of i1L _J �___ ___ tii _- A•ehrue- —`� ' .P _ • •p,„e,i,l �� -w u,_i.r,Y e . _ 2 ::'ar .3�. r Scale = 1:24,000 x '�, f \ . +J wen �-- + ---'--• _. P " - o - �" �. w n -.... + -- _•__. lQt. SSS _ - � r -_ - .'_-�-'�--�. i �., ---;-;--r -}-h L�•� �-` `` lel - - 5• • II �• ,�• ILAN I: e w ' N1AIf1U _ .OUM {' ie: :> afar irulme 5w,.:: - ,� . .•�t: .n....atii t��+ n I lLn �nwlu f� �,s!.= i "<:rdr... c „' PGFForm ENVIRONMENTAL • - INFORMATION FORM (Part I - Initial Study) City otRancho Cucamonga (Please type or print clearly using ink. Use the tab key to move from one line to the next line.) Planning Department (909)477-2750 The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed project so that the City may review the project pursuant to City Policies,Ordinances,and Guidelines; the California Environmental Quality Act; and the City's Rules and Procedures to Implement CEQA. It is important that the information requested in this application be provided in full. Upon review of the completed Initial Study Part I and the development application, additional Information such as, but not limited to,traffic, noise, biological,drainage,and geological reports may be required. The project application will not be deemed complete unless the identified special studies/reports are submitted for review and accepted as complete and adequate. The project application will not be scheduled for Committees' review unless all required reports are submitted and deemed complete for staff to prepare the Initial Study Part II as required by CEQA. In addition to the filing fee, the applicant will be responsible to pay or reimburse the City, its agents, officers, and/or consultants for all costs for the preparation, review, analysis, recommendations, mitigations, etc., of any special studies or reports. • GENERAL INFORMATION: INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED. Please note that it is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the application is complete at the time of submittal; City staff will not be available to perform work required to provide missing information. �,/� Application Number for the project to which this form pertains: JY�I-? " VV(��Yk�� I Project Title: Goodman Logistics Center, Rancho Cucamonga Name&Address of project owner(s): Goodman Rancho SPE, LLC Ward Mace,Vice President Entitlements &Construction, Southwest Region 18201 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 1170 Irvine, CA 92612 Name 8 Address of developer or project sponsor. Same as Project Owner. • Contact Person 8 Address: MIG I Hogle-Ireland: Pam Steele (951)787-9222 I:\PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\Initial Study Partl.doc Page 1 of 10 D,E,F,G-99 1500 Iowa Avenue, Suite 110 Riverside, CA 92507 • Name 8 Address of person preparing this form(if different from above): MIG I Hogle-Ireland: Bulmaro Canseco Same address as Contact Person. Telephone Number. (951) 787-9222 PROJECT •R • I • Information indicated by an asterisk()is not required of non-construction CUP's unless otherwise requested by staff. '1; Provide a full scale(8-1/2 x 11)copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s)which includes the project site, and indicate the site boundaries. Please see enclosed USGS maps. 2,' Provide a set of color photographs that show representative views into the site from the north, south, east, and west; views into and from the site from the primary access points that serve the site;and representative views of significant features from the site. Include a map showing location of each photograph. Please see enclosed Site Photos. 3) Project Location(describe): The project site is located at the southwest comer of Arrow Route and Etiwanda Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 4) Assessor's Parcel Numbers(attach additional sheet if necessary): • Assessor's Parcel Numbers(APN): 0229-131-04, -17, and-25 •5) Gross Site Area(acrsq. It): 77.5 acres(3,375,900 sq. ft.) '6) Net Site Area(total site size minus area of public streets 8 proposed 75 acres . ft.3 268 762 s dedications): ( q ) 7 Describe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change which would affect the project site (attach additional sheet if necessary): None required. 8 Include a description of all permits which will be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental • I:\PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\Initial Study Partl.doc Page 2 of 10 D,E,F,G-100 agencies in order to fully implement the project: fi (5 I22ti 1)A Tentative Parcel Map to subdivide the 75-acre site into two(2) parcels. • 2)A Design Review(Commercial/Industrial)application to construct L,6671Msquare feet of warehouse/distribution space. 8)A MiReF Exreplie, applicalies te allew a higher Rear Area Ratio fe Buildimu 2 (Pareel 2) by-3% J111 � 4)Grading and building permits for site construction. ml� 9 Describe the physical setting of the site as it exists before the project including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals,mature trees,trails and roads,drainage courses,and scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on site(including age and condition)and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of significant features described. In addition,cite all sources of information(i.e.,geological andror hydrologic studies,biotic and archeological surveys,traffic studies): The project site consists of an V-shaped parcel encompassing 75-acres of land currently occupied by Ameron International, Water Transmission Group(Ameron). Ameron manufactures concrete and steel pipe products for long-term water conveyance systems at the project site. A number of buildings/structures have been constructed on-site. The site has been disturbed and is partially paved with minimal ornamental landscape features. Mature trees include pine and eucalyptus trees located along the western and eastern sections of the site. The Ameron facility was constructed in 1966 and has been in continual operation since • then. The topography of the site and surrounding area is characterized as relatively flat. The project site is bound by Arrow Route to the north, Etiwanda Avenue to the east, and Juneberry Drive(a private street)to the west. All three(3) roadways are paved. No trails currently exist within the project site or vicinity. The project site is located within a developed industrial hub, which includes manufacturing, recycling, and warehouse and distribution uses; as such, drainage courses, scenic resources, and sensitive plant or animal species are not located on-site or within the vicinity. For a more detailed description of the existing use and operations of the Ameron facility, including detailed site soiUgeologic conditions, please see the enclosed Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, Phase II Soil Sampling, Geotechnical Investigation, and Site Photos included in the project submittal. 10 Describe the known cultural and/or historical aspects of the site. Cite all sources ofinformation(books,published reports and oral history): Please see the project Phase I Environmental Site Assessment(ESA). Per the ESA, "according to review of available historical data, the subject property appears to have been vacant land used for agricultural purposes prior to its original development with some of the current improvements in 1966. The site has been expanded • by Ameron since that time over the years to include the current process areas." I:\PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\InHial Study Partl.doc - Page 3 of 10 D,E,F,G-101 11, Describe any noise sources and their levels that now affect the site(aircraft,roadway noise,etc.)and how they will affect proposed uses: Please see the project Noise Assessment. Per the Noise Assessment, the dominant noise source at the • vicinity of the project site is roadway traffic. The average noise levels measured between 62.9 and 72.4 dBA. A logistics center is not considered to be sensitive to noise; therefore, the project will not be affected by existing ambient noise. 12, Describe the proposed project in detail. This should provide an adequate description of the site in terms of ultimate use that will result from the proposed project. Indicate if there are proposed phases for development, the extent of development to occur with each phase, and the anticipated completion of each increment. Attach additional sheet(s)if necessary.- Please see the enclosed Project Description included in the project submittal. • 13 Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use(residential,commercial,etc.),intensity of land use(one-family,apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.)and scale of development(height, frontage, setback, rear yard, etc.): The project site is located within an industrial hub, which includes manufacturing, recycling, warehouse, and distribution uses to the north, east, south, and west. Properties to the north also include the Metropolitan Water District's Etiwanda Control Facilityand Reservoir, properties to the northeast include the Victoria Woods Apartments, and properties to the east include an ARCO gas station and the Tole House Cafe. The nearest apartments are located approximately 350 feet northeast from the perimeter of the project site. 14 Will the proposed project change the pattern, scale, or character of the surrounding general area of the project? The proposed industrial project will not change the pattern, scale, or character of the surrounding area, as the project site is located within an industrial hub, which includes manufacturing, recycling, warehouse, and distribution uses. The project will significantly enhance the aesthetic look of the site and area, as the project proposes to construct attractive warehouse buildings to house industrial uses and minimize outdoor storage. • (:\PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\Initial Study Partl.doc Page 4 of 10 D,E,F,G-102 15 Indicate the type of short-term and long-term noise to be generated, including source and amount. How will these noise levels affect adjacent properties and on-site uses? What methods of soundproofing are proposed? • Please see the project Noise Assessment. Short-term project noise includes noise generated by construction activities and long-term noise includes traffic noise and noise generated by on-site activities. Per the Noise Assessment, "no significant noise impacts are anticipated for the project, although the project will need to comply with the limits on the hours of construction as specified in the City's Noise Ordinance." '16, Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenic trees: The site has been disturbed and is partially paved with no scenic trees. Mature trees include 59 pine trees,three (3)eucalyptus trees, and five(5) deciduous trees located along the western and eastern sections of the site, as shown on the Tentative Parcel Map. The project proposes to remove all existing trees,which range in diameter between 12"and 36". The project proposes 259 24"-box trees and 72 36%box trees, as shown on the Conceptual Landscape Plan. 17, Indicate any bodies of water(including domestic water supplies)into which the site drains: Please see the project Preliminary WQMP. The project site is located in the larger Santa Ana River watershed. Runoff from a portion of the site flows westerly to Day Creek and runoff from the remaining portions of the site flows easterly to the San Sevaine Channel. Both the Day Creek and San Sevaine Channels are tributary to the Santa Ana River Watershed, Reach 3,which drains into the Prado Flood Control Basin. • 18 Indicate expected amount of water usage. (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification, please contact the Cucamonga Valley Water District at 987-2591. a. Residential(gaUday) N/A Peak use(galrDay) N/A b. CommerciaOnd. (gaUday/ac) 1'863 Peak use(gaUmin/ac) 1,863 19 Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal. ❑ Septic Tank Sewer. If septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests. If discharge to a sanitary sewage system is proposed indicate expected daily sewage generation: (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification,please contact the Cucamonga Valley Water District at 987-2591. a. Residential(gal/day) N/A b. CommerciaUlndustrial1,863 (gaUday/ac) RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20, Number of residential units:_ Detached(indicate range of parcel sizes, minimum lot size and maximum lot size: Attached(indicate whether units are rental or for sale units).' • I:\PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\Initial Study Partl.doc Page 5 of 10 D,E,F,G-103 21, Anticipated range of sale prices and/or rents: Sale Price(s) $ to $ • Rent(per month) $ to $ 22, Specify number of bedrooms by unit type: 23, Indicate anticipated household size by unit type: 24. Indicate the expected number of school children who will be residing within the project: Contact the appropriate School Districts as shown in Attachment B: a. Elementary: b. Junior High: • c. Senior High COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL, AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25, Describe type of use(s)and major function(s)of commercial, industrial or institutional uses: The industrial buildings are intended to be used as warehouse/distribution facilities; however, end users have not been identified at this time, as such, specific details about the future operation of the facilities are not currently available. 26, Total floor area of commercial, industrial, or institutional uses by type: Building 1 includes 10,000 sq. ft. of office space&580,168 sq. ft. of warehouse space totaling 590,168 sq. ft. of building area. Building 2 includes 10,000 sq. ft. of office space& 1,066,920 sq. ft. of warehouse space totaling 1,076,920 sq. ft. of building area. 27, Indicate hours of operation: Even though the end users are not known at this time, we request approval for future businesses to be open 24 hours a dayf7 days per week depending on their businessloperational needs. 28) Number of employees: Total:The project includes the construction of speculative Maximum Shift: industrial buildings. This information is not known at this •Time of Maximum Shift: time. I:\PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\Initial Study Pant.doc Page 6 of 10 D,E,F,G-104 29. Provide breakdown of anticipated job classifications, including wage and salary ranges, as well as an indication of the rate o hire for each classification(attach additional sheet if necessary): • The project includes the construction of speculative industrial buildings. This information is not known at this time. 30, Estimation of the number of workers to be hired that currently reside in the City: Not known at this time. "31 For commercial and industrial uses only, indicate the source, type, and amount of air pollution emissions. (Data should bf verified through the South Coast Air Quality Management District, at(818)572-6283): Please seethe project Air Quality and Climate Change Assessment. Per the Assessment, 'The project will not result in substantial emissions of oxides of nitrogen, volatile organic compounds (with mitigation incorporated), or particulate matter and would not exceed the regional growth assumptions used in the AQMP. The project will not individually cause or cumulatively contribute to an air quality standard violation. Emissions of carbon monoxide and localized construction emissions will not substantially impact sensitive receptors" ALL PROJECTS 32 Have the water,sewer,fire,and flood control agencies serving the project been contacted to determine theirability to providt adequate service to the proposed project? If so,please indicate their response. • Water and wastewater/sewage services are currently provided to the Ameron site by the Cucamonga Valley Water District and they will continue to provide these services to the proposed development. The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District has been contacted regarding the proposed project and they have indicated their ability to serve the proposed development. The Flood control district has not been contacted regarding the proposed project. 33 In the known history of this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous andror toxic materials; Examples of hazardous and/or toxic materials include,but are not limited to PCB's;radioactive substances;pesticides an( herbicides;fuels,oils,solvents,and other flammable liquids and gases. Also note underground storage of any of the above Please list the materials and describe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, i known. Please see the project Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, Phase It Soil Sampling, Brine Pond Cap Inspection and Maintenance Program (Compliance Documents), and Project Description. The former brine pond was closed in place as a landfill in 1994 and final closure of the concrete cap was completed in 2006. The project has been designed around the brine pond cap, which is to remain in place. Per the Phase II report, the property can be redeveloped as proposed with minimal soil removal. • I:\PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\Initial Study Partl.doc Page 7 of 10 D,E,F,G-105 34. Kill the proposed project involve the temporary or long-term use,storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials including but not limited to those examples listed above? If yes, provide an inventory of all such materials to be used anc proposed method of disposal. The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown anc • labeled on the application plans. The industrial buildings are intended to be used as warehouse/distribution facilities; however, end users have not been identified at this time, as such, specific details about the future operation of the facilities are not currently available. 35 The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fee. The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning CommissionlPlanning Director hearing.' I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for adequate evaluation of this project to the best of my ability,that the facts,statements,and information presented are true and correct tot he best of my knowledge and belief I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Date:2/26/13 Signature: — Title:ProjectAssociate, MIG Ho le-Ireland • • I:\PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\Inkial Study Pard.doc Page 8 of 10 D,E,F,G-106 ATTACHMENT "A" • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTIMATED WATER USE AND SEWER FLOWS FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT (Data Provided by Cucamonga Valley Water District February 2003) Water Usage Single-Family 705 gallons per EDU per day Multi-Family 256 gallons per EDU per day Neighborhood Commercial 1000 gal/day/unit (tenant) General Commercial 4082 gal/day/unit (tenant) Office Professional 973 gal/day/unit (tenant) Institutional/Government 6412 gal/day/unit (tenant) Industrial Park 1750 gal/day/unit (tenant) Large General Industrial 2020 gal/day/unit (tenant) Heavy Industrial (distribution) 1863 gal/day/unit (tenant) Sewer Flows • Single-Family 270 gallons per EDU per day Multi-Family 190 gallons per EDU per day General Commercial 1900 gal/day/acre Office Professional 1900 gal/day/acre Institutional/Government Industrial Park 3000 gal/day/acre Large General Industrial 2020 gal/day/acre Heavy Industrial (distribution) 1863 gal/day/acre Source: Cucamonga Valley Water District Engineering & Water Resources Departments, Urban Water Management Plan 2000 • (:\PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\Initial Study Partl.doc Page 9 of 10 D,E,F,G-107 ATTACHMENT B Contact the school district for your area for amount and payment of school fees: • Elementary School Districts Alta Loma 9350 Base Line Road, Suite F Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)987-0766 Central 10601 Church Street, Suite 112 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)989-8541 Cucamonga 8776 Archibald Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 987-8942 Etiwanda 6061 East Avenue P.O. Box 248 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 (909)899-2451 High School Chaffey High School • 211 West 5th Street Ontario, CA 91762 (909) 988-8511 • I:\PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\Initial Study Partl.doc Page 10 of.10 D,E,F,G-108 10 9 9 11 8 10 7 8 C I 6 8 � D I s E v 2 , _..aE •..... 000 32 1 IO 8 B 3 2 4 00 4 I 3 5 2 3 4 5 2 .2 .I 6 0 A I I s s s � F GIN _ 6 6 4 7 000 5 I • I II ;A 6 to H ,e G s 9 7 4 wAdOm 8 11 10 Source:Google Earth 2012 Photos taken by MIGIHogle-Ireland. January CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FEE 2 6 phi? 000as Not to Scale R'CEIVED - FLANNINGPhoto Location Map Hogle-Irelan Goodman Logistics Center Rancho Cucamonga, CA D,E,F,G-109 �1 Y Goodman •• center r R A.3 A.4 • ' M Hogle Ireland Site Photographs Goodman Logistics Center Rancho Cucamonga, CA D,E,F,G-111 _ JII f • I r` GoodmanHogle-Ireland Site Photographs .. Rancho Cucamonga, f� !e' ! 1Wj Hogle-Ireland Site Photographs M ' Goodman LogisticsCenter. g B.2 • F . M Z ® HO -71(- Ireland - - __ _ Site Photographs Goodman Logistics Center Rancho Cucamonga, CA D,E,F,G-114 i r ; a a fk •a J f L it 41, a M3 G •• - Goodman •• Rancho Cucamonga, F s� t: "� ,•*yam F` f i y �y; +.A. o Y , •�. i � � • , r •• - • Site Photographs GoodmanRanchoLogisticsCucamonga, '� •K , l�� ' ♦ 1A 1� �;i � ry_:�`�...) � I y� ' xis •,III `I's �i �J � 1j— ,yw, a rpt .: ♦�M1"` ,) .`.. . �t � �•,}�s �'. g � �rS �:t � ' + yy1, R ��!!X� a� is �. •. � � � 1.. i C t MGHogle-Ireland Site Photographs Goodman .. � s I" +r I+ CD Hogle-Ireland Site Photographs GoodmanLogistics Rancho • •. i O 1 tl I Site Photographs Goodman .. Rancho Cucamonga, i A ~" 1 I`I 1 M1 ik�i•" T y C.6 Hogle-Ireland Site Photographs Goodman Logistics Center Rancho Cucamonga, CA D,E,F,G-120 I d. . C.7 c.a • © Hogie-Ireland Site Photographs Goodman Logistics Center Rancho Cucamonga, CA D,E,F,G-121 I • I � I ' C.9 • C.10 fwi .9 Hogle-Ireland Site Photographs • Goodman Logistics Center Rancho Cucamonga, CA D,E,F,G-122 rr i 1 i i e Goodman .. Center } V T • a D.2 r 1115 t. or; „ vim T D.3 !' Hogle-Ireland Site Photographs Goodman Logistics Center Rancho Cucamonga, CA D,E,F,G-124 Y• !a s .y d M G •• - • Photographs .Site Goodman .. Rancho • •. ,i � t t' A tI'A#n/ � I'F'S �y '• 1 2 . FJ V MJ , t Y A ` a { GoodmanHogle-Ireland Site Photographs .. Rancho • .. a 1 F i'• D.8 • D.9 Hogle-Ireland Site Photographs Goodman Logistics Center Rancho Cucamonga, CA D,E,F,G-127 a r r - 8" + r, D.10 • E.1 © Hogle-Ireland Site Photographs Goodman Logistics Center Rancho Cucamonga, CA D,E,F,G-128 wA;'�'�-, Al ' \ . � � Al ����� E.2 E.a Ho bdeGnd Site Photographs Goodman Logistics Center Rancho Cucamonga, c %E,RG-1» 1 r.7 M r •• , Site Photographs Goodman .. Center • Cucamonga, • "� ray r a � r. _y Site Photographs M G •. - • Goodman •• Rancho Cucamonga, u I . rf" r Site Photographs G og GoodmanLogistics RanchoCucamonga, r .ir Sf !i 15k s t • ty„ , ° p�•i [ 1 • k 4 M 1 G •• - • Site Photographs Goodman .. Cucamonga,Rancho v a' f.Y.. Photographso GoodmanHogle-Ireland Site •• Rancho Cucamonga, I i 6, y F . F.4 F.5 • Ho le-Ireland Site Photographs g Goodman Logistics Center Rancho Cucamonga, CA D,E,F,G-135 f i I M G •• • Site ' Goodman .. Rancho Cucamonga, x 4 r _ W I M G •• - • Site Photographs Goodman .. Rancho Cucamonga, F v G.2 • _ t G.3 d l I l Ho® � Site Photographse- rean� g Goodman Logistics Center Rancho Cucamonga, CA D,E,F,G-138 r G.4 • k,t G.5 • Ho le-Ireland Site Photographs �' 9 Goodman Logistics Center Rancho Cucamonga, CA D,E,F,G-139 5F" ' G.6 G.7 i Site Photographs Ho le-Ireland Goodman Logistics Center g Rancho Cucamonga, CA D,E,F,G-140 s , A +• �� �R'" t �a a YY a, M PhotographsG •• • Site Goodman •. Rancho Cucamonga, ' ; Sa`✓y IIiT'w y n .c r r Y G •• - • PhotographsSite GoodmanLogistics , , /. 2< ) \ » H., � ., . . . , . H.2 ! Site Photographs Ho QdmGnd Goodman Logistics Center Rancho Cucamonga, CA %tRGwa r _ E I r}, 1 � f . X17 �4.y J$ ED r�4- Site Photographs •• • Goodman •• Rancho Cucamonga, rA ll y' M .. - . PhotographsG Goodman .. Cucamonga,Rancho is +'yrs' 'Y •T w M GHogle-Ireland Site Photographs Goodman .. �F •\ ' Pe M G •• - • Site Photographs Goodman .. CenterRancho . g z ., , � y, w• :, N Ohl �s Apse Ak6-; ED M G •• - • Site Photographs 53oodman Logistics Rancho Cucamonga, i i I 1.2 q �A h q 1.3 .. • Hogle Ireland Site Photographs Goodman Logistics Center Rancho Cucamonga, CA D,E,F,G-149 i AAaat! a Fey. ..,.�� �• _ �� H. eta F 4`t/rF 1.4 • i' 1.5 �j Hogle-Ireland Site Photographs Goodman Logistics Center Rancho Cucamonga, CA D,E,F,G-150 1.6 •^''a as . - s I.7 • Hogle-Ireland Site Photographs Goodman Logistics Center Rancho Cucamonga, CA D,E,F,G-151 a pr. 1 ` C v tY T� Site Photographs M ; G •• • GoodmanCucamonga,Logistics Rancho . •. E F �h 1 rt� iwnw 4 a , Site Photographs M G •. - - . • Goodman .. Rancho Cucamonga, �y • i i f I � 4 • 1 3 . f 2N,• Z'4 k. j♦ f� J.6 ` Hogle Ireland Site Photographs J.aGoodman Logistics Center Rancho Cucamonga, CA D,E,F,G-154 � J Lf� f y+ ` -•-M ,� � - - � it 1 1 CD PhotographsHogle-Ireland Site Goodman .. Cucamonga,Rancho • ..tai} — Y 'ev M+ s �i gd' �9 as i N \ GoodmanHogle-Ireland Site Photographs .. Center Rancho Cucamonga, City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND 1. Project File: Development Review DRC2013-00155 2. Related Files: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19448 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00315 3. Description of Project: A review of a proposal to construct two (2) industrial warehouse buildings of 555,664 square feet (Building 1/Phase 1) and 1,033,565 square feet (Building 2/Phase 2) on a property comprised of three(3) parcels with a combined area of 3,255,834 square feet (74.7 acres) which is currently developed with a concrete pipe manufacturing/storage facility (operated by Ameron International) in the Heavy Industrial (HI) District located at the southwest corner of Arrow Route and Etiwanda Avenue; APNs: 0229-131-04, -17, and -25. 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Pam Steele MIG/Hogle-Ireland 1500 Iowa Avenue, Suite#110 Riverside, California 92507 • 5. General Plan Designation: Heavy Industrial 6. Zoning: Heavy Industrial (HI) District 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The project site is a property comprised of three (3) parcels with a combined area of 3,255,834 square feet (74.7 acres) located at the southwest corner''of Etiwanda Avenue and Arrow Route. The street frontage along Arrow Route is about 2,600 feet while the street frontage along Etiwanda Avenue is about 1,700 feet. The site is a concrete pipe manufacturing/storage facility that is operated by Ameron International, Inc. There are several buildings (of various size and purpose), outdoor equipment, areas for parking and storage, and associated infrastructure on the site. Most of the existing buildings are located at the north side of the site near Arrow Route. The southeastern part of the site is primarily used for the storage of finished concrete pipes. Paving on the site is generally limited to the parking areas and the associated access driveways. To the west and south are manufacturing facilities operated by Tree Island Wire and Gerdau, respectively. To the north are a chemical manufacturing facility operated by Air Liquide and a water storage facility operated by the Metropolitan Water District (MWD). To the east are several small commercial (e.g. ARCO and Tole-House Caf6) and industrial businesses. The Victoria Woods apartment complex is located northeast of the site at the northeast corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Arrow Route. The subject property and the properties to the west and south are zoned Heavy Industrial (HI) District while the properties to the east and north are zoned General Industrial (GI) District. The property at the northeast corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Arrow Route is zoned Medium (M) Residential, Etiwanda Specific Plan (South Overlay). Landscaping is generally limited to trees and small shrubs along Arrow Route and along the private driveway that is shared with the adjacent properties at the west side-of the site. An additional north-south row of trees is located parallel to (and about 300 feet west of) Etiwanda Avenue. The site is generally level with an elevation of about 1,160 feet and 1,125 feet at the northwest and southeast corners, respectively, of the site. • 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga D,E,F,G-157 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00155 Page 2 Planning Department • 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Mike Smith, Associate Planner (909)477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement): GLOSSARY—The following abbreviations are used in this report: CVWD—Cucamonga Valley Water District EIR— Environmental Impact Report FEIR—Final Environmental Impact Report FPEIR - Final Program Environmental Impact Report NPDES— National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NOx—Nitrogen Oxides ROG—Reactive Organic Gases PM10— Fine Particulate Matter RWQCB— Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD—South Coast Air Quality Management District SWPPP—Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan URBEMIS7G— Urban Emissions Model 7G ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED • The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a 'Potentially Significant Impact," 'Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated,"or"Less Than-Significant-Impact' as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. (x)Aesthetics ( )Agricultural Resources (x)Air Quality (x) Biological Resources (x) Cultural Resources (x) Geology& Soils (x) Greenhouse Gas (x) Hazards&Waste Materials (x) Hydrology &Water Quality Emissions ( ) Mineral Resources (x) Noise ( ) Land Use& Planning ( ) Public Services ( ) Recreation ( ) Population & Housing ( ) Utilities & Service Systems ( ) Mandatory Findings of ( )Transportation/Traffic Significance DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: (x) I find that although the propo a project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effec i is cape because revisions in the project have been made by, or agreed to, by the project pro n n ITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATIO will be prepared. Prepared By: Date: 9 z Reviewed By: Date: ( /� �✓ • Rev 2-26-13 D,E,F,G-158 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00155 Page 3 • Less Than Slgnficant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Wdh Then Slpnfrant Mitigaton Signfnant No en act Inco ete0 trn act M acl EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway? C) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, ( ) ( ) (✓) ( ) which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Comments: a) There are no significant vistas within or adjacent to the project site. The site is not within a view corridor according to General Plan Figure LU-6. b) The project site contains no scenic resources and no historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway. There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho • Cucamonga. C) The project site is located at the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Arrow Route. The site is characterized by industrial development to the north, east, south, and west. At the northeast corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Arrow Route is an apartment complex. The visual quality of the area will not degrade as a result of this project. The site is in an area that is developed with buildings that generally do not conform to the City's current design standards as they were built prior to the incorporation of the City and adoption of the current design standards and guidelines. The site will be developed with two (2) industrial buildings that will be similar to the newer buildings in the industrial areas of the City. Staff has determined that the architecture of the buildings is consistent with the design standards, guidelines, and policies established by the Planning Commission and City Council. The project complies with the City's technical requirements including floor area ratio; minimum building, parking lot, and wall setbacks; dock and storage area screening; and landscape coverage as described in the Development Code. Approval by the Design Review Committee and Planning Commission is required prior to construction of the buildings. City standards require the applicant to underground existing and new utility lines and facilities to minimize unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No. 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution. d) The project will increase the number of street lights in the immediate vicinity and the amount of industrial lighting used within the site - particularly within the dock and storage areas. The design and placement of street lights will be required to comply with City standards including requirements for shielding, diffusing, or indirect lighting to avoid glare. Although industrial lighting can be a source of substantial glare, such lighting will be • required to comply with the City standards for maximum height applicable to light poles and wall-mounted lights. Due to the bulk of the buildings, the general layout of the buildings and associated screen walls, and existing, surrounding industrial development, Rev 2-26-13 D,E,F,G-159 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00155 Page 4 eaa Than • Signifranl Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Parente r wnn Than SgMirant Mifgatgn Signdicant No M t Inco ated an act h the impact of the lights on sensitive receptors such as residences will be limited. The impact is not considered significant. 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Williamson Act contract? C) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause re-zoning of, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓ ) forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220 (g), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code Section 51104(g))? d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) land to non-forest use? e) Involve other changes in the existing environment, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) • which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? Comments: a) The site is not designated as Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance. The site is located at the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Arrow Route. The site is characterized by industrial development to the north, east, south, and west. At the northeast corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Arrow Route is an apartment complex. There are approximately 209 acres of Farmland of Local Importance, Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga according to the General Plan and the California Department of Conservation Farmland Map 2010. Concentrations of Important Farmland are sparsely located in the southern and eastern parts of the City that is characterized by existing and planned development. Farmland in the southern portion of the City is characterized by industrial, residential, and commercial land uses and Farmland in the eastern portion of the City is within the Etiwanda area and planned for development. Further, a large number of the designated farmland parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic viability is doubtful; therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan. The General Plan FPEIR identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. There are no • Williamson Act contracts within the City. Rev 2-26-13 D,E,F,G-160 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00155 Page 5 • Less Than Sgnilkant Leas Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than Slgnficant MitgSg atpn nftant No Im act Incor aced an act Mn ad C) There are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that is zoned as forest land or timberland. Therefore no impacts would occur related to the conversion of forest land to non-forest use. Further, there are no areas within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that are zoned as forest land, timberland, or Timberland Production. No mitigation is required. d) There are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that qualify as forest land or timberland. Therefore no impacts would occur related of the loss or conversion of forest land to non-forest use. Further, there are no areas within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that are zoned as forest land, timberland, or Timberland Production. e) The site is located at the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Arrow Route. The site is characterized by industrial development to the north, east, south, and west. At the northeast corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Arrow Route is an apartment complex. The nearest agricultural use is about 0.50-mile to the west-northwest of the project site within the utility corridor located between Foothill Boulevard and Jack Benny Drive. Furthermore, there are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that qualify as forest land. Therefore, there is no potential for conversion of forest land to a non-forest use. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 3. AIR QUALITY. Would the project: • a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? C) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) number of people? Comments: a) As noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.3), the proposed project would not interfere with the region's ability to comply with Federal and State air quality standards for Criterion 1 Increase in the Frequency or Severity of Violations (local air quality impacts) or Criterion 2 Exceed Assumptions in the AQMP (consistency with the 2003 AQMP). Therefore the project is consistent with the 2003 AQMP and is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. b) Both the State of California and the federal government have established health-based • ambient air quality standards (AAQS) for seven air pollutants. These pollutants include ozone (03), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), coarse particulate matter with a diameter or 10 microns or less (PM10), fine particulate matter less Rev 2-26-13 D,E,F.G-161 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00155 Page 6 Lees That • Sgndicant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentlatly wmt Than Sgndcant Wgation Signdicant No Fn t Incw raeO kn a:l Ir, act than 2.5 (PM2.5) microns in diameter and lead. Among these pollutants, ozone and particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5) are considered regional pollutants while the others have more localized effects. In addition, the State of California has set standards for sulfates, hydrogen sulfide (142S), vinyl chloride and visibility reducing particles. These standards are designed to protect the health and welfare of the populace with a reasonable margin of safety. The City of Rancho Cucamonga area is within the South Coast Air Basin, which is under the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). The California Clean Air Act (CCAA) provides the SCAQMD with the authority to manage transportation activities at indirect sources. Indirect sources of pollution are generated when minor sources collectively emit a substantial amount of pollution. Examples of this include motor vehicles at an intersection, a mall and on highways. SCAQMD also regulates stationary sources of pollution within a jurisdictional area. Direct emissions from motor vehicles are regulated by the Air Resources Board (ARB). The combination of topography, low mixing height, abundant sunshine, and emissions from the second largest urban area in the United States gives the Basin the worst air pollution problem in the nation. The Basin experiences a persistent temperature inversion (increasing temperature with increasing altitude); this inversion (coupled with low wind speeds) limits the vertical dispersion of air contaminants, holding them relatively near the ground. • Pursuant to the Federal Clean Air Act (FCAA) of 1970, the EPA established national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for six major pollutants, termed criteria pollutants: ozone (03), coarse particulate matter with a diameter or 10 microns or less (PM10), fine particulate matter less than 2.5 (PM2,5) microns in diameter, carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), and lead. Criteria pollutants are defined as those pollutants for which the Federal and State governments have established AAQS, or criteria, for outdoor concentrations in order to protect public health. Data collected at permanent monitoring stations are used by the EPA to classify regions as "attainment" or "non-attainment" depending on whether the regions met the requirements stated in the primary NAAQS. Nonattainment areas have additional restrictions as required by the EPA. The EPA has designated the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) as the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) responsible for ensuring the Basin's compliance with the FCAA. The South Coast Air Basin is in Non-Attainment Status for Ozone, PM10 and PM2.5. Specific criteria for determining whether the potential air quality impacts of a project are significant are set forth in the SCAQMD's CEQA Air Quality Handbook. The criteria include daily emissions thresholds, compliance with State and national air quality standards, and consistency with the current AQMP. As prescribed by SCAQMD, an Air Quality and Climate Change Assessment was prepared by MIG/Hogle-Ireland in February 2013 that utilizes the CaIEEMod methodology and CEQA Air Quality Handbook, April 1993 to evaluate short-term construction emissions and short-term construction emissions for localized significant thresholds, long-term operational emissions, operation emissions for localized significant thresholds, and Green House Gas Emissions. • Rev 2-26-13 D.E.F.G-162 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00155 Page 7 • Leas Than SignRiwnt Lena Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potant�ly wan Than spndiwrn Mitigation SgnRicarn No M act I area Ln act hn L Short Term (Construction) Impacts Per the Air Quality and Climate Change Assessment prepared by MIG/Hogle-Ireland, the project will be constructed in two phases. Phase 1 includes demolition and grading of the entire project site, followed by construction of Building 1. Construction of Building 2 will occur after construction of Building 1. It is estimated that construction of the Building 1 will take approximately two years to complete beginning in early 2014. Building 2 is anticipated to take approximately three years beginning in mid 2016. Soil import and export will not be required during grading activities. Em�ssfons`Ibstd� with-mita atioris ,Sumrner r :fin ra3 ROG NOx CO Sox PM10 PM2.5 2014 11.32 90.75 52.02 0.10 13.12 7.50 2015 6.73 43.42 44.50 0.10 6.48 2.37 2016 (unmitigated) 391.03 50.56 59.16 0.14 10.05 2.57 2016 (mitigated) 59.16 50.56 59.16 0.14 10.05 2.57 2017 1 7.41 46.31 56.24 0.14 9.78 2.31 2018 6.84 42.45 53.61 0.14 9.54 2.07 2019 (unmitigated) 453.99 39.07 51.43 0.14 9.32 1.85 • 2019 (mitigated) 68.99 39.07 51.43 0.14 9.32 1.85 «tis Ein'i$s3_nsijfbs/ aY� _ mitigaswWinte'r, ," .. s v. O ROG NOx C 'sox' PM10 PM2.5 2014 11.33 90.77 51.94 0.10 13.12 7.50 2015 6.85 44.09 44.73 0.09 6.49 2.38 2016 (unmitigated) 391.05 51.60 59.61 0.13 10.06 2.56 2016 (mitigated) 59.17 51.60 59.61 0.13 10.06 2.56 2017 7.63 47.19 56.73 0.13 9.80 2.32 2018 7.05 43.18 54.15 0.13 9.55 2.08 2019 (unmitigated) 454.01 39.67 52.01 0.13 9.33 1.86 2019 (mitigated) 68.64 39.67 52.01 0.13 9.33 1.86 Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55 Substantial? No No No No No No ROG= reactive organic gases; N0.=oxides of nitrogen; CO=carbon monoxide; SO.=oxides of sulfur; PM10 and PM2.5=particulate matter Source: Air Quality and Climate Change Assessment-(Table 11) (CalEEMod Output) MIG/Hogle-Ireland, February 2013 Equipment Exhausts and Related Construction Activities Construction activities produce combustion emissions from various sources such as site • grading, utility engines, on-site heavy-duty construction vehicles, asphalt paving, and motor vehicles transporting the construction crew. Exhaust emissions from construction activities envisioned on site would vary daily as construction activity levels change. The use of construction equipment on site would result in localized exhaust emissions. Rev 2-26-13 D,E,F,G-163 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00155 Page 8 Lou Then • SgnfcantLen Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentialy wah Than SpnLic Mitigation Sign/cant No IM ated "Bact on ect Fuqitive Dust Fugitive dust emissions are generally emissions that are generally associated with land clearing and exposure of soils to the air and wind, and cut-and-fill grading operations. Dust generated during construction varies substantially on a project-by project basis, depending on the level of activity, the specific operation and weather conditions at the time of construction. Construction emissions can vary greatly depending on the level of activity, the specific operations taking place, the equipment being operated, local soils, weather conditions and other factors. The proposed project will be required to comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 to control fugitive dust. Architectural Coatings Architectural coatings contain VOCs that are similar to ROCS and are part of the 03 precursors. There are two (2) industrial buildings proposed for the project. Per the Air Quality and Climate Change Assessment prepared by MIG/Hogle-Ireland, based on the results of the model, maximum daily emissions from the construction of the warehouses will result in excessive emissions of volatile organic chemicals (identified as reactive organic gases) associated with interior and exterior coating activities (see Appendix B). To compensate for excessive VOC emissions from coating activities, the model includes use of a minimum 25 grams per liter (gll) VOC content for interior coatings and 75 gA VOC • content for exterior surfaces. Use of low-VOC coatings during construction activities will reduce VOC emissions to 59.17 lbs/day (59.16 lbs/day in summer) for Building 1 and 68.64 Ibsrday (68.62 lbs/day during summer) for Building 2, less than the threshold established by SCAQMD. The requirement for use of low-VOC coatings has been included as Mitigation Measure AQ1 in Section 8 of this report, and as follows: 1) Prior to issuance of building permits, the project proponent shall submit, to the satisfaction of the Planning Department, a Coating Restriction Plan (CRP), consistent with South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) guidelines and a letter agreeing to include in any construction contracts and/or subcontracts a requirement that the contractors adhere to the CRP. The CRP measures shall be implemented to the satisfaction of City Building Director. These may include the following: • That volatile organic compounds (VOC) of proposed architectural coatings not exceed 25 for interior applications. • That volatile organic compounds (VOC) of proposed architectural coatings not exceed 75 g/I for exterior applications. This measure shall conform to the performance standard that emissions of volatile organic compounds from application of interior or exterior coatings shall not exceed the daily emissions thresholds established by the South Coast Air Quality Management District. The CRP shall specify use of High- Volume, Low Pressure (HVLP)spray guns for application of coatings. Odors • Heavy-duty equipment in the project area during construction would emit odors. However, the construction activity would cease to occur after individual construction is completed. Rev 2-26-13 D.E.F.G-164 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00155 Page 9 • Lm Then Sign9canl Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PO aalally wnh Than Signircanl Miligatm Signsicant No xporatocl IMPWA k act No other sources of objectionable odors have been identified for the proposed project, and no mitigation measures are required. In compliance with SCAQMD Rule 402 the expected uses are not anticipated to emit any objectionable odors. Therefore, objectionable odors posing a health risk to potential on-site and existing off-site uses would not occur as a result of the proposed project. Naturally Occurring Asbestos The proposed project is located in San Bernardino County, and it is not among the counties that are found to have serpentine and ultramafic rock in their soils. In addition, there has been no serpentine or ultramafic rock found in the project area. Therefore, the potential risk for naturally occurring asbestors (NOA) during project construction is small and less than significant. 2010 General Plan FPEIR Air Quality Analysis and Mitigation Measures (short term) Short Term (Construction) Emissions - Continued development will contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions. In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and • construction activities. While most of the dust would settle on or near the project site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area. Construction is an on-going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area. Construction workers and equipment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete. Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment emissions are required to be assessed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) on a project- specific basis and in conformance with the General Plan FPEIR. Therefore, the following mitigation measures as identified in the FPEIR shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels: 2) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 3) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District(SCAQMD)as well as City Planning Staff. 4) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or • high-volume, low-pressure spray. 5) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. Rev 2-26-13 D,E,F,G-165 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00155 Page 10 Les.Than • Sgnilicanl L.I. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Mh Than SgnMiranl maigalion Sgnllbanl No )MLXaletl Im ml Im ecl 6) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 7) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 8) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. 9) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 10) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of Air Quality based on the future build out of the City. Based upon on the Urban Emissions Model (URBEMIS7G) estimates in Table 4.3-3 of the General Plan (FPEIR), Nitrogen Dioxide (NOA Ozone (03), .and Particulate Matter (PM2.5 and PM10) would exceed SCAQMD thresholds for significance; therefore, they would all be cumulatively considerable if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less-than-significant. • Rev 2-26-13 D.E.F.G-166 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00155 Page 11 • Less Than Sghficanl Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Pctenlaly Ann man SipnRicaM Mitigatbn Sip ffnant I Na kn act Incorpvatea Impact hn as Long Term (Operational) Impacts Long Term Proiect Operational Emissions Long-term air pollutant emission impacts are those associated with stationary sources and mobile sources involving any project-related changes. The site is a concrete pipe manufacturing/storage facility that is operated by Ameron International, Inc. There are several buildings (of various size and purpose), outdoor equipment, areas for parking and storage, and associated infrastructure on the site. Most of the existing buildings are located at the north side of the site near Arrow Route. The southeastern part of the site is primarily used for the storage of finished concrete pipes. Paving on the site is generally limited to the parking areas and the associated access driveways. The proposed project, the construction and operation of two (2) industrial warehouse buildings of 555,664 square feet (Building 1/Phase 1) and 1,033,565 square feet (Building 2/Phase 2), would result in a net reduction in the number of buildings but an increase in the size of industrial buildings in the project area; therefore, the proposed project would result in net increases in both stationary and mobile source emissions. The stationary source emissions would come from additional natural gas consumption for on-site buildings and electricity for the lighting in the buildings and at the parking area. ter . „ e1 •._� drfa.Dhi . inisslonfl ' da =;Sgm►rier•.-.. ,�V ` ROG/VOC NOX CO SOX PM10 PM2.5 Area 15.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Energy 0.04 0.34 0.25 0.00 0.03 0.03 Mobile 3.97 24.16 34.00 0.10 9.43 1.17 Total 19.44 24.50 34.25 0.10 9.46 1.20 Significant 55 Threshold 55 550 150 150 55 Significant No No No No No No Impact MI `t3 (tilingK Nbillit- ROGNOCI NOx I CO Sox PM10 PM2.5 Area 12.11V16. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Energy -0.09 -0.69 -0.01 -0.06 -0.06 Mobile 2.39 21.55 0.07 5.6 0.67 Total 2.39 21.55 0.07 5.60 0.67 Significant 55 550 150 150 55 Threshold Significant Impact No No No No No No Source: Air Quality and Climate Change Assessment-(Table 12) (CalEEMod Output) MIG/Ho le-Ireland, February 2013 • Rev 2-26-13 D,E,F,G-167 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00155 Page 12 Less Than • Significant Lass Issues and Supporting Information Sources: sotea�inwnn Than Significant Magaton Significant M, "Pact in area m m t 91 Bri 9i`""d' (bu.d ati s. et era dna(Datl : sib' d °Sm ir, ROGNOC NOx CO Sox PM10 PM2.e Area 40.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Ener -0.02 -0.20 -0.17 0.00 -0.02 -0.02 Mobile 7.98 56.88 68.44 0.24 22.63 2.63 Total 48.22 56.68 68.44 0.24 22.63 2.63 Significant Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55 Significant No Yes No No No No Impact "`.d "sx1 �nr�: , ill�ut 3Neti0""''atiiiri dai ;E'rttiss orf 1. a ROGNOC NOx CO sox PMtg PM2.5 Area 40.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Ener -0.02 -0.20 -0.17 -0.01 -0.02 -0.02 Mobile 7.90 59.77 78.71 0.23 22.68 2.68 Total 48.147 59.56 78.54 0.23 22.66 2.66 Significant Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55 Significant No Yes No No No No IM act Source: Air Quality and Climate Change Assessment-(Table 13)(CalEEMod Output) Feb • MIG/H le-Ireland, February 2013 Per Table 13, the operational emission of NO, will exceed the threshold of significance. Per the Air Impact and Climate Change Assessment prepared by MIG/Hogle-Ireland on February 2013, to mitigate operational emissions of NOx, pursuant to the on-road engines mitigation guidance provided by SCAQMD, NOx emissions were analyzed with application of a NOx filter. Emissions reduction technology has the capability to remove a minimum of 25 percent NOx emissions from on-road diesel vehicles. Emissions with use of NOx reducing filters are summarized in Table 14 (Mitigated Operational Emissions). With emissions reductions in effect, or similar emissions levels through other technology or engine emissions factors, NOx emissions will not exceed the daily threshold established by SCAQMD. The requirement for incorporation of filter or other technology upon occupation of Building 2 is incorporated as Mitigation Measure AQ2, and as follows: 11) Prior to issuance of occupancy permits or business licenses, future tenants of the proposed project shall submit a report to the Planning Department identifying all diesel engine powered trucks within the occupant's fleet and verification that vehicles have been equipped with a filter that reduces oxides of nitrogen by a minimum of 25 percent below typical operating conditions as verified by the California Air Resources Board through executive order, or that vehicles have been equipped with control technologies or powered by engines that emit oxides of nitrogen at levels that will not otherwise cause the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) daily threshold for oxides of nitrogen. This report shall be updated upon occupancy by a new tenant. • Rev 2-26-13 D_E_F.G-168 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00155 Page 13 • Leaa han SpnAieam Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Pae^'ala wah Then significant Mdigatbn Spnilicanl No MPwt Inc ata0 Im a<t Im act MlUgally mission;,fibs/d'ayj Source NOx Summer Winter Area 0.00 0.00 Energy -0.20 -0.20 Mobile 42.66 44.83 Total 42.51 44.67 Threshold 55 Substantial? No Source: Air Quality and Climate Change Assessment-(Table 14) (CalEEMod Output) MIG/Ho le-Ireland February 2013 2010 General Plan FPEIR Air Quality Analysis and Mitigation Measures (long term) Long Term (Operational) Emissions- The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report(FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of Air Quality based on the future build out of the City. In the long-term, development consistent with the General Plan would result in significant operational vehicle emissions based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 4.3-3 of the General Plan FPEIR; therefore, would all be cumulatively • significant if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less-than-significant. The following mitigation measures as identified in the FPEIR shall be implemented: 12) Provide preferential parking to high occupancy vehicles and shuttle services. 13) Improve thermal integrity of the buildings and reduce thermal load with automated time clocks or occupant sensors. 14) Landscape with native and/or drought-resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 15) Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planting programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC-01 measure. 16) All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i.e., in excess of 10 minutes). 17) All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools. 18) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas. 19) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible. • After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, the General Plan FPEIR identified the citywide increase in operational emissions as a significant unavoidable Rev 2-26-13 D,E,F,G-169 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00155 Page 14 Less Then • SipWF, Lass Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Powntially wan Then Sipnirranl Mitipalgn Sipnili'anI No Im xt Inw aleE kn W bn acl adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council as noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.3). C) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 4.3), continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. The General Plan FPEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The project proposed is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large. The SCAQMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors: long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities. According to the SCAQMD, projects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401. The project site is located within 1/4 mile of a sensitive receptor-an apartment complex located at the northeast corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Arrow Route. Per the Health Risk Assessment prepared by MIG/Hogle- Ireland on February 2013, discrete and grid receptor concentrations are detailed in the AERMOD output files. The highest concentration of diesel particulate matter (DPM) will occur at SA Recycling, located at the northwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue at the BNSF • railroad. Incremental increases at this facility are less than the threshold of 10 in one million established by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). The non-cancer hazard index at this facility is 0.005. This hazard index values are less than the threshold of 1.0 established by SCAQMD. The cancer and non-cancer risk calculations provided in the Goodman Logistics Center Health Risk Assessment show that no receptor will be exposed to an increase in cancer or non-cancer health risks in excess of SCAQMD thresholds. Potential impacts to air quality are consistent with the Public Health and Safety Super- Element within the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. During construction, there is the possibility of fugitive dust to be generated from grading the site. The mitigation measures listed under 3.b above will reduce impact to less-than-significant levels. e) Construction Odors (Short-term) may include odors associated with equipment use including diesel exhaust or roofing, painting and paving. These odors are temporary and would dissipate rapidly. Operation Odors (Long-term) are typically associated with the type of use. The proposed project is the construction and operation of two (2) industrial warehouse buildings of 555,664 square feet (Building 1/Phase 1) and 1,033,565 square feet (Building 2/Phase 2). Typically, warehouse/distribution activities do not create objectionable odors that are normally associated with heavy manufacturing operations. No adverse impacts are anticipated. • Rev 2-26-13 D,E,F,G-170 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00155 Page 15 • Lese Tranfic SlgnaM Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Po1Bn1°"Y wnn Than Signf"m Wigation Signficam No MXNarea M act Meq 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? C) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with • established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan? Comments: a) The project site is located at the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Arrow Route. The site is characterized by industrial development to the north, east, south, and west. At the northeast corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Arrow Route is an apartment complex. The site is a concrete pipe manufacturing/storage facility that is operated by Ameron International, Inc. According to the General Plan Figure RC-4, and Section 4.4 of the General Plan FPEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources; therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals. There are several buildings (of various size and purpose), outdoor equipment, areas for parking and storage, and associated infrastructure on the site. Most of the existing buildings are located at the north side of the site near Arrow Route. The southeastern part of the site is primarily used for the storage of finished concrete pipes. Paving on the site is generally limited to the parking areas and the associated access driveways. To the west and south are manufacturing facilities operated by Tree Island • Wire and Gerdau, respectively. To the north are a chemical manufacturing facility operated by Air Liquide and a water storage facility operated by the Metropolitan Water District (MWD). To the east are several small commercial (e.g. ARCO and Tole-House Caf6) and industrial businesses. The Victoria Woods apartment complex is located Rev 2-26-13 D.E.F.G-171 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00155 Page 16 Leas Than • Sgnl"M Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially wan Thea Sgnic Mitgstion Significant No M act hcowateE an as M t northeast of the site at the northeast corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Arrow Route. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan. b) The project site is located in an urban area with no natural communities and no riparian habitat exists on-site due to the on-site and surrounding improvements and characteristics as described in 4.a above. As a result, project implementation would have no impact on these resources. C) No wetland habitat is present on-site due to the on-site and surrounding improvements and characteristics as described in 4.a above. As a result, project implementation would have no impact on these resources. d) The City is primarily located in an urban area that does not contain large, contiguous natural open space areas due to the on-site and surrounding improvements and characteristics as described in 4.a above. Wildlife potentially may move through the north/south trending tributaries in the northern portion of the City and within the Sphere of Influence. As a result, project implementation would have no impact on these resources. e) There are heritage trees along Arrow Route and along a private driveway that is shared with the adjacent properties at the west side of the project site. An additional north-south row of trees is located parallel to (and about 300 feet west of) Etiwanda Avenue. Project • implementation will result in the removal of these trees. Therefore, the proposed project is in conflict with the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance. The following mitigation measure shall reduce the impact to less-than-significant. 1) The trees that are removed shall be replaced with new trees, on a one-to-one basis, of a minimum 15-gallon size. f) Neither the City nor the SOI are within an adopted HCP, NCCP, or other approved State Habitat Conservation Plan area. The project site is not located within a local conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Figure RC-1. No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur. 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project, a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) significance of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5? C) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) outside of formal cemeteries? Comments: • a) The project site has not been identified as a "Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code 17.18 (Historic Preservation). There will be no impact. Rev 2-26-13 D.E.F.G-172 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00155 Page 17 • Lev Thin SigndicantLeas Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Polentally we) Than Signiswa Mnigatbn Signdicare No M I ?Mated Mew 4n wt b) There are no known archaeological sites or resources recorded on the project site; however, the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.6). Construction activity, particularly grading, soil excavation, and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of Cultural Resources based on the future build out of the City. The following mitigation measures as identified in the FPEIR shall be implemented: 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special • qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. • Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with Section 21083.2 Archaeological resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, including but not limited to, avoiding archaeological sites, capping or covering sites with soil, planning the site as a park or green space or paying a in-kind mitigation fee. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. C) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.6) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan. According to the research performed at the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County and the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the Sphere-of- Influence, including the project site; however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources. The older alluvium, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last "Ice Age" and the appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils. The project site is underlain by Quaternary alluvium per the Public Safety Element of the General Plan; therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented: • 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading,the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or Rev 2-26-13 nFcr._»1 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00155 Page 18 Lou Thin • Spnimm, Lua Issues and Supporting Information Sources: '..'•'ly Wd' T SgTnircarn maigation Sqp 21' No M Inc Ib M act M preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to,the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. d) The project site is a concrete pipe manufacturing/storage facility that is operated by • Ameron International, Inc. There are several buildings (of various size and purpose), outdoor equipment, areas for parking and storage, and associated infrastructure on the site. The project site is surrounded by industrial development. Public improvements such as streets and most associated public infrastructure are already in-place. No known religious or sacred sites exist within the project area. No evidence is in place to suggest the project site has been used for human burials. The California Health and Safety Code (Section 7050.5) states that if human remains are discovered on-site, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. As adherence to State regulations is required for all development, no mitigation is required in the unlikely event human remains are discovered on-site. No adverse impacts are anticipated. 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) • iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) liquefaction? Rev 2-26-13 D.E.F.G-174 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00155 Page 19 • Less Than SignBicanl Lasa Issues and Supporting Information Sources: ping �"Y W"" Tha^ Spnd¢ant Milipah Sipnfcent No In act I aleC Im W Im iv) Landslides?. ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) C) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? Comments: a) No known faults pass through the site and it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault, according to the General Plan Figure PS-2, and Section 4.7 of the General Plan FPEIR. The Red Hill Fault • is about 3 miles to the northwest of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies about 5 miles to the north of the site. These faults are both capable of producing MW, 6.0-7.0 earthquakes. Also, the San Jacinto fault, capable of producing up to Mw,7.5 earthquakes is about 14.5 miles northeasterly of the site and the San Andreas, capable of up to Ma, 8.2 earthquakes, is about 16.5 miles northeasterly of the site. Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking. Adhering to the Uniform Building Code and Standard Conditions will ensure that geologic impacts are less-than-significant b) The City of Rancho Cucamonga is within a designated Soil Erosion Control Area Exhibit 4.7-4 of the General Plan FPEIR. The proposed project will require the excavation, stockpiling, and/or movement of on-site soils. The Rancho Cucamonga area is subject to strong Santa Ana wind conditions during September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems. Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust control; however, development of this project under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area as pavement, roads, buildings, and landscaping are established. Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels: 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM10 emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off- site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM10 emissions from the site during such episodes. Rev 2-26-13 D.E.F.G-175 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00155 Page 20 Lass Than • Signkcant Lass Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PMentiaky Wah Than Signd"nt Mkigatm Significant No kn ad Inwr atatl kn acl M 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. C) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.7) indicates that there is a potential for the hillside areas at the northern end of the City and in the SOI for slope failure, landslides, and/or erosion. Areas subject to slope instability contain slopes of 30 percent or greater. Landslides may be induced by seismic activity, rain, or construction. The site is not on a slope of 30 percent or greater, or within an Earthquake hazard zone or other unstable geologic unit or soil type according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-2. Soil types on-site consist of Tujunga Loamy Sand (TuB) (0 - 5 percent slopes) and Hanford Coarse Sandy Loam (HaC) (2 - 9 percent slopes) Soil associations according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-3. No adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The majority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the project site, is located on alluvial soil deposits. These types of soils are not considered to be expansive. Soil types on-site consist of Tujunga Loamy Sand (TuB) (0 - 5 percent slopes) and Hanford Coarse Sandy Loam (HaC) (2 - 9 percent slopes) Soil associations according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-3. These soils are typically stable. No adverse impacts are anticipated. e) The project will connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for • wastewater disposal. No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed. No impacts are anticipated. 7. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. Would the project: a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or 0 indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? Comments: a) Regulations and Significance - The Federal government began studying the phenomenon of global warming as early as 1979 with the National Climate Protection Act(92 Stat. 601). In June of 2005, Governor Schwarzenegger established California's Green House Gas ("GHG") emissions reduction target in Executive Order (EO) 5-3-05. The EO created goals to reduce GHG emissions for the State of California to 2000 levels by 2010; GHG emissions reduced to 1990 levels by 2020; and GHG emissions reduced to 80 percent below 1990 levels b 2050. Additional) on December 7 2009 the U.S. Environmental Y Y. ental Protection Agency (USEPA) issued findings regarding GHGs under rule 202(a) of the Clean Air Act: (1) that GHGs endanger human health; and (2) that this will be the first steps to regulating GHGs through the Federal Clean Air Act. The USEPA defines six key GHGs (carbon dioxide [CO2], methane [CH4], nitrous oxide [N2O], hydrofluorocarbons [HFCs], perfluorocarbons [PFCs], and sulfur hexafluoride [SFB]. The combined emissions of these well-mixed greenhouse gases from new motor vehicles and engines contribute to • GHG pollution. Rev 2-26-13 D.E.F.G-176 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00155 Page 21 • Lesa Tlwn Signdeanl Lev Issues and Supporting Information Sources: P°'en'iaIlr wN """ Than 5pndicant Mitpation SpnMicmll No Mn Inw araC Yn Mn The western States, including Arizona, California, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, and Washington, already experience hotter, drier climates. California is a substantial contributor of GHGs and is expected to see an increase of three to four degrees Fahrenheit (°F) over the next century. Assembly Bill (AB) 32 requires that the California Air Resources Board (ARB), the lead agency for implementing AB 32, determine what the statewide GHG emission level was in 1990 and approve a statewide GHG emissions limit (427 million metric tons of CO2 equivalent) to be achieved by 2020 and prepare a Scoping Plan to outline the main strategies for meeting the 2020 deadline. Significant progress can be made toward the 2020 goal through existing technologies and improving the efficiency of energy use. Other solutions would include improving the State's infrastructure, and transitioning to cleaner and more efficient sources of energy. The ARB estimates that 38 percent of the State's GHG emissions in 2004 was from transportation sources followed by electricity generation (both in-State and out-of-State) at 28 percent and industrial at 20 percent. Residential and commercial activities account for 9 percent, agricultural uses at 6 percent, high global warming potential gases at 3 percent, and recycling and waste at 1 percent. It is not anticipated that any single development project would have a substantial effect on • global climate change but that GHG emissions from the project would combine with emissions across California, the United States, and the world to cumulatively contribute to global climate change. Therefore, consistent with the ARB's Climate Change Scoping Plan, the proposed project was evaluated for consistency with the Early Action Measures (Scoping Plan is a recommendation until adopted through normal rulemaking).. The proposed project is assessed by determining its consistency with the 37 Recommended Actions identified by ARB. In compliance with Senate Bill (SB) 97 and CEQA, the project has been analyzed based on a qualitative analysis (CEQA 15064.4). Additionally, the ARB was directed through SB 375 to develop regional GHG emission reduction targets to be achieved within the automobile and light truck sectors for 2020 and 2035. SCAQMD and ARB maintain ambient air quality monitoring stations in the Basin. The stations closest to the project site are the Upland station and the Fontana-Arrow Highway station. The Upland station monitors all criteria pollutant except PM10, PM2,5, and SO2 which are monitored at the Fontana-Arrow Highway station. The ambient air quality in the project area for CO, NO2, and SO2 are consistently below the relevant State and Federal standards (based on ARB and EPA from 2007, 2008, and 2009 readings). Ozone, PM1o, and PM2.5 levels all exceed State and Federal standards regularly. Project Related Sources of GHG's- Based on the Guidelines for the Implementation of California Environmental Quality Act, Appendix G, a project would normally be considered to have a significant effect on air quality if the project would violate any ambient air quality standards, contribute substantially to an existing air quality violation, expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations, or conflict with adopted environmental plans and goals of the community. However, neither the CEQA statutes, Office of Planning and Research (OPR) guidelines, nor the draft proposed changes to the CEQA Guidelines • prescribe thresholds of significance or a particular methodology for performing an impact analysis. Significance criteria are left to the judgment and discretion of the Lead Agency. Rev 2-26-13 D.E.F.G-177 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00155 Page 22 Leas Thm • Signiri t Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: TPS "°"Y NMi T"d" canl M4ipelon Sgnrticant No act IncXWalae m acl m Project related GHG's would include emissions from direct and indirect sources. Based on the Air Quality and Climate Change Assessment that was prepared by MIG/Hogle-Ireland in February 2013 the project would result in the following emissions of (list identified emission here, 6 possible emissions include carbon dioxide [CO2], methane [CH4], nitrous oxide [N20], hydrofluorocarbons [HFCsj, perfluorocarbons [PFCs], and sulfur hexafluoride [SF61) and would not result in the other GHG's. As seen in the tables below, the proposed project would result in a total of 239.50 MTCO2eq/yr from construction activities and 44,180.65 MTCO2eq/yr for area sources and 4,398.30 MTCO2eq/yr for mobile sources. Total project related direct operation emission would result in 48,578.95 MTCO2eq/yr. Short Term (Construction) GHG Emissions - The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.5) indicates that GHG emissions result from construction activities associated with diesel- powered construction equipment and other combustion sources (i.e. Generators, workers vehicles, material delivery, etc.). The GHG emitted by construction equipment is primarily carbon dioxide (CO2). The highest levels of construction related GHG's occur during site preparation including demolition, grading and excavation. Construction related GHG's are also emitted from off-site haul trucks and construction workers traveling to the job site. Exhaust emissions from construction activities would vary each day with the changes in construction activity on site. The combustion of fossil-based fuels creates GHG's such as CO2, Cho, and N20. CH4 is emitted during the fueling of heavy equipment. Construction greenhouse gas emissions are • "�4, ,Short Term(Constructbn)Greenhouse Gas Emissions(MTlyear)v_ , CO2 CH4 N20 Total Phase 1 2014 1,146.94 0.10 0.00 1,149.01 2015 1,075.76 0.07 0.00 1,077.21 2016 467.21 0.03 0.00 467.87 Phase 2 2016 556.19 0.03 0.00 556.79 2017 1,545.19 0.07 0.00 1,546.75 2018 1,541.78 0.07 0.00 1,54322 2019 843.38 0.04 0.00 844.23 Subtotal 7,176.45 0.41 0.00 7,185.08 Amortized Total 239.22 0.01 0.00 239.50 1: MTCO2E 2: Amortized over 30-years Source: Air Quality and Climate Change Assessment-(Table 17) (CalEEMod Output) MIG/H le-Ireland, February 2013 Although the emissions are less than the de facto SCAQMD threshold of 3,000 MT/year, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented to further reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels: • 1) The project must comply with all rules that assist in reducing short-term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAQMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive Rev 2-26-13 D.E.F.G-178 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00155 Page 23 • Less Than S9naicant Lees Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially wan Than signdicant hNigaton signffcant No an t Inc aletl 4n act Meq dust including treating the site with water or other soil-stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 2) The construction contractor shall select construction equipment based on low-emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures' specification. 3) Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 minutes. 4) Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline- or diesel-powered engines where feasible. 5) Construction should be timed so as not to interfere with peak-hour traffic. 6) Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be supported and encouraged for the construction crew. Lona Term (Operational) GHG's Emissions - The primary source of GHG emissions generated by the proposed project would be from motor vehicles, combustion of natural gas for space and water heating, as well as off-site GHG emissions from generation of • electricity consumed by the proposed land use development over a long term. CEQA requires the Lead Agency to review the project for "adequacy, completeness, and a good faith effort at full disclosure," to determine potential impacts of GHG's. Therefore the project has been analyzed based on methodologies and information available to the City at the time this document was prepared. Estimates are based on past performance and represent a scenario that is a worst case with the understanding that technology changes may reduce GHG emissions in the future. To date, there is no established quantified GHG emission threshold. Operational greenhouse gas emissions are: �} „,y 5� Long-Term'(Ope�atlonal),t'areenhouse Gss Emissions(MTtyear), CO2 CH4 N20 Total Energy 999.76 0.05 0.02 1,006.03 Mobile 4,396.53 0.08 0.00 4,398.30 Solid Waste 3,376.58 199.55 0.00 7,567.14 Water/Wastewater 28,795.92 232.46 6.23 35,607.48 Total 37,846.97 432.14 6.25 48,578.98 1: MTCO2E Source: Air Quality and Climate Change Assessment- (Table 18) (CalEEMod Output) MIG/Ho le-Ireland, February 2013 The project is the construction of two (2) industrial warehouse buildings of 555,664 square feet (Building 1/Phase 1) and 1,033,565 square feet (Building 2/13hase 2) on a property comprised of three (3) parcels with a combined area of 3,255,834 square feet (74.7 acres) • which is currently developed with a concrete pipe manufacturing/storage facility (operated by Ameron International) and therefore potentially would result in an increase in the net increases of both stationary and mobile source emissions. The majority of energy Rev 2-26-13 D,E,F,G-179 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00155 Page 24 Les.Than • sodcant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially wM Than signlicant MltigaWn signbcant No hPW InewwaleG M hn consumption typically occurs during project operation (more than 80 percent and less than 20 percent during construction activities). The proposed project will incorporate several design features that are consistent with the California Office of the Attorney General's recommended measures to reduce GHG emission including: water efficient landscaping; shade trees; bike racks; walkways that provide accessibility to public sidewalks; and preferential parking for carpools/vanpools. The project is consistent with the California Environmental Protection Agency Climate Action Team proposed early action measures to mitigate climate change included in the CARB Scoping Plan mandated under AB 32. The proposed project will incorporate several design features including: water efficient landscaping; shade trees; bike racks; walkways that provide accessibility to public sidewalks; and preferential parking for carpools/vanpools. Additionally, the City is participating in the development of a Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) with SANBAG for the San Bernardino County area pursuant to Senate Bill (SB) 375. The project's long term operation emissions will contribute to area pollutants but will not exceed any of the SCAOMD's thresholds. The proposed project would have less than a significant tong term impact with the following mitigation measures: 1) Construction and Building materials shall be produced and/or manufactured locally. Use "Green Building Materials" such as materials that are resource • efficient, recycled and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way Including low-volatile-organic-compound (VOC) materials. 2) Design all buildings to exceed California Building Code Title 24 energy standard Including but not limited to any combination of; • Increased Insulation, • Limit air leakage through the structure, • Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances, • Landscape and develops site utilizing shade, prevailing winds and landscaping, • Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems, • Install light colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements, • Install solar or light emitting diodes(LED's)for outdoor lighting. 3) Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and Include the following; • Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in • compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. Rev 2-26-13 D.E.F.G-1 R0 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00155 Page 25 • Less Than Sgnficans Leas Issues and Supporting Information Sources: P°'anon, wnh hi^ Sgniticant M,egwksn Sgnlicam No knpav nco ate0 M M t • Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available and/or install the infrastructure to deliver and use reclaimed water. • Design building to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets, dual flush toilets and waterless urinals/water heaters. • Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non-vegetated surfaces. 4) Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educate employees about reducing waste and about recycling. Per the Air Impact and Climate Change Assessment prepared by MIG/Hogle-Ireland on February 2013, "with implementation of project design features...as follows: • Reclaimed Water(WSW-1) The proposed buildings will be connected to non-potable recycled water as provided by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency. Sixty percent of outdoor water(landscaping) • demand will be served by reclaimed water. • Low-Flow Fixtures(WUW-1) Pursuant to CALGREEN requirements, the proposed buildings will be required to meet a minimum indoor water use reduction performance standard of 20 percent. This will include use of low-flow fixtures in restrooms (faucets and toilets) and kitchen faucets in break areas. The CaIEEMod defaults for percentage of flow reduction have been utilized at 32 percent for bathroom faucets, 20 percent for toilets, and 18 percent for kitchen faucets. • Recycling Services(SW-1) Pursuant to the mandatory commercial recycling requirements of AB341, a minimum of 50 percent of all solid waste will be recycled at each of the proposed warehouses GHG emissions will be reduced from 48,818.45 MTCO2E to 38,712.05, as summarized in Table 20 (Reduced Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory). Project design features and regulatory requirements will result in a 20 percent reduction in greenhouse gas emissions when compared to BAU conditions and therefore meets the 13 percent reduction threshold. No additional mitigation is required." Reduced;:Greenh. semTtyea�) +°�,.'ouGaE CO2 CH4 N20 Total Business-As- Usual 37,846.97 432.14 6.25 48,578.98 • Reduced 31,397.82 284.91 5.20 38,712.05 \ Difference -6,449.15 -147.23 -1.05 -9,866.90 Rev 2-26-13 D.E.F.G-181 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00155 Page 26 Less Tb • Sip lrc Lou Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially wM T a spnfcant Minga9m SgnfcaM No M Inco aced M onpav Percent Change -17 -34 -17 -20 1: MTCO2E Source: Air Quality and Climate Change Assessment- (Table 20) (CalEEMod Output) MIG/Ho le-Ireland, February 2013 b) The proposed project is the construction of two (2) industrial warehouse buildings of 555,664 square feet (Building 1/Phase 1) and 1,033,565 square feet (Building 2/Phase 2) on a property comprised of three (3) parcels with a combined area of 3,255,834 square feet (74.7 acres) which is currently developed with a concrete pipe manufacturing/storage facility (operated by Ameron International). No other applicable plans, policies, or regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emission apply to the project. The 2010 General Plan Update included adopted policies and Standard Conditions that respond to the Attorney General and the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA). The General Plan policies and Standard Conditions guide infill and sustainable development reliant on pedestrian connections, re-use and rehabilitation of existing structures, link transportation opportunities, promote development that is sensitive to natural resources and incentivizes denser mixed use projects that maximizes diverse opportunities. The proposed project will incorporate several design features including: water efficient landscaping; shade trees; bike racks; walkways that provide accessibility to public sidewalks; and preferential parking for carpools/vanpools and therefore is consistent with the policies of the General Plan. The General Plan Final • Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of GHG's and determined that GHG emissions would be cumulatively considerable, which would be a significant unavoidable adverse cumulative impact. A Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed project would not hinder the State's GHG reduction goals established by Assembly (AB) 32 and therefore would be less than a significant impact. 8. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? C) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of ( ) ( ) (✓) ( ) hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? • Rev 2-26-13 D.E.F.G-182 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00155 Page 27 • Lass Then Signdi nt Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potwhany WON Than Spnftant MAigation Signifx- No M acl Inc aleE Yn acl M ect e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Comments: a) The proposed project does not include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition, which is considered a full • service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive that any other in the State. The City has an Emergency Operations Plan that meets State and Federal requirements and is in the process of updating the approved 2005 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant. The proposed industrial buildings are to be constructed as speculative with no definitive users at this time. However, at the time of occupancy the Planning Department will review each Business License for each tenant to determine the potential impacts to the surrounding residential uses and elementary schools. No adverse impacts are expected. b) The proposed project does not include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition, which is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the State. The City has an Emergency Operations Plan that meets State and Federal requirements and is in the process of updating the approved 2005 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant. The proposed industrial buildings are to be constructed as speculative with no definitive users at this time. However, at the time of occupancy the Planning Department will review each Business License for each tenant to determine the potential impacts to the surrounding residential uses and elementary schools. The redevelopment of the site will require the developer to comply with SCAQMD Rule 1403, CAL-OSHA regulations for asbestos and lead abatement and other State and Federal regulations prior to their redevelopment and reuse of the site. No adverse impacts are anticipated. • c) There are no schools located within 1/4 mile of the project site. The nearest school to the project site, Perdew Elementary School, is about 0.50-mile to the north at 13051 Miller Avenue. No impacts are anticipated. Rev 2-26-13 D.E.F.G-183 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00155 Page 28 Los Then • Sig nffc Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: voremaiiT wdh Than Signdbent Mdgation SgnftW No ' Yn 1 Inco eleC M 1 m t d) The site is a concrete pipe manufacturing/storage facility that is operated by Ameron International, Inc. There are several buildings (of various size and purpose), outdoor equipment, areas for parking and storage, and associated infrastructure on the site. According to the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment prepared by URS on July 25, 2012: At the time of the site visit, URS observed less than 1-gallon to 55-gallon containers of the following hazardous materials: Paints Used Oil Thinners Compressed Gases Hydraulic Oils Polyken 1039 Primer Lubricants/Grease Coal Tar Motor Oils Concrete Release A ent(Strip 3.3 Antifreeze/Coolant Adhesives Solvents Epoxy Resins Batteries Cement admixtures Up to 5-gallon containers were stored in flammable materials cabinets throughout the subject property at points of use. Bulk drum storage areas were observed inside Building 5, outside Building 5 and in 90-day accumulation points throughout the subject property. • All drums were observed on top or within secondary containment structures. Minor staining from regular use and spills was observed in the maintenance building on the concrete surface. Other evidence of spills was observed within the secondary containment of bulk oil storage areas and is considered de minimis. Heavy staining was observed on the unpaved ground surface in the area of coal tar application. According to review of available historical data, the subject property appears to have been vacant land used for agricultural purposes prior to its original development with some of the current improvements in 1966. The site has been expanded by Ameron since that time over the years to include the current process areas. Groundwater beneath the site is present in extensive regional aquifers within the valley fill. Based on the topography of the site vicinity, groundwater flow is inferred to be to the southwest. According to information provided by the Cucamonga Water District, the depth to ground water, as measured on January 14, 2005 in a well located approximately 1.5 miles northeast of the subject property, was 472 feet below ground surface (bgs). Storm water at the subject property appears to be directed via sheet flow toward the southeast comer of the site. Storm water drains and vaults were observed in the south central and south eastern portions of the subject property. Newly constructed storm water swales were also present in the southern portion of the subject property. Storm water is directed to a retention basin located in the southeast corner of the subject property. According to the most recent Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) available for review, dated February 10, 2011, the catch basins and retention basin located in the southeast portion of the site were installed last year. Prior to installation of these features, storm water was allowed to run offsite onto adjacent properties during heavy storm events. No other drains were observed on the subject property. • Waste water generated during batch plant operation and mortar pipe coating process is conveyed to an aboveground recycling unit...which separates the waste concrete and Rev 2-26-13 D.E.F.G-184 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00155 Page 29 • Lasa Than Slpndirant Lass Issues and Supporting Information Sources: P t dally wan Than Spnea:ant MRipation Spnai nt No an eE M hn slurry water. The separated water then enters into a sump... [and then]...sent out via underground piping to the cure yard sump. The water is then used for sprinkling on cement pipes during the curing process out in the cure yard areas. Waste water used in the cure yard is conveyed through a series of unlined ditches and underground pipes to the cure yard sump located in the southern portion of the subject property. The sump is cleaned out of its sediment about once a year. Reportedly, the sediment clean-out is spread across the subject property as road base. In the event of evaporation, municipal water can be added to the cure yard sump for use in the curing process. A Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) memorandum dated April 27, 2007 indicated that because of evaporation and the number of times water is used and recirculated throughout the subject property, the waste water generated onsite is in constant violation of limits for Total Dissolved Solids (TDS), Hardness, Chloride, and pH. However, the RWQCB also stated it is unlikely the water permeates the ground surface because by its nature, the water forms a semi-permeable cementatious or plasticized layer on the ground. There are five sanitary wastewater septic tanks that lead to pits on the subject property. Reportedly, no leach-lines are present at the subject property...the septic tanks are pumped out on a regular basis by an outside contractor. • A former evaporation pond located in the south central portion of the site was used to collect water softener regeneration brine. The brine was found to have a general mineral and electrical conductivity level high enough to pose a threat to water quality. The former brine pond was closed in place as a landfill under the direction of the RWQCB, Santa Ana Region, Land Disposal Section in 1994. All the liquid was removed and the salt-affected soils had been backfilled and capped under concrete to minimize water infiltration. Final closure of the concrete cap was completed in 2006. As a condition of closure, a quarterly inspection of the concrete cap is required under a Brine Pond Cap Inspection and Maintenance Program. In addition, an annual report summarizing the inspection and monitoring program is to be submitted to the RWQCB. A deed restriction was put in place at the subject property in 2007 which pertains to the operations and maintenance of the former brine pond area. Ameron International is listed in the HAZNET and TRIS databases. According to the HAZNET database, the subject property disposed of asbestos-containing waste from the site in 2005. The Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System (TRIS) database indicates that the subject property generated a large amount of manganese metal waste for recycling in 2009. Ameron So CA Division is listed in the RCRA-SQG, FINDS, and HIST UST databases. According to the EDR Report, the subject property is a small-quantity generator. No generator violations were reported. The HIST UST database indicates that a total of nine USTs were located onsite. URS reviewed a UST closure report prepared by ENCON Corporation (ENCON) dated October 30, 1998 and a letter dated May 7, 1999 from the San Bernardino County Fire Department, Hazardous Materials Division regarding No Further Action for the removal of tanks from the subject property. The report and NFA letter are related to the removal of 3 tanks adjacent to the southeast of Building 5. No • other information regarding the closure of remaining USTs reportedly removed in 1987 from the subject property was provided for review. Rev 2-26-13 D.E.F.G-1 R5 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00155 Page 30 Less Tun • sivl= less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: '°'°n`m"y wM Than Sgnii mdgwm sgnfc No M Inco atop trn Meq Ameron Pipe Div, Arrow Plt is listed in the AST and SWEEPS UST databases. URS noted numerous ASTs at the subject property. The SWEEPS UST database lists three USTs at the subject property including two 10,000-gallon diesel tanks and one 12,000-gallon product tank. These tanks have since been removed from the site. Brine Fac, Etiwanda - Closing is listed in the INDS, NPOES, WMUDS/SWAT, CHMIRS, LDS, ENF, San Bernardino Co. Permit, and HAZNET databases. According to the EDR Report, the subject property has an active general industrial NPDES permit. In addition, the subject property processed a Notice of Intent (NOI) with the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) to comply with the terms of the General Permit to Discharger Storm Water Associated with Industrial Activity, Their Waste Discharger Identification (WDID) number is: 8 361007020. As such, the subject property prepares and maintains a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). The subject property is listed in the WMUDS/SWAT, LDS, and ENF databases for the construction, regulation, inspection, and monitoring of the former brine pond. The CHMIRS database indicates that a release of approximately 50-gallons of fuel spilled onto the ground surface in 2007. The incident was reported to the Office of Emergency Services a year later as a 'historical report'. Based on observations made during the Phase I site visit, potential recognized environmental conditions (RECs) as well as potential environmental concerns that could require remedies were identified in connection with historic and current operations at the site. Areas of concern included former underground storage tank locations, areas where • lead solder is shaved off piping onto the ground, area where copper grit is used for sandblasting, area where maintenance fluids are allowed to run onto the ground, area where gunite is applied to pipe, area where coal tar is applied to pipe, and areas where cure water and waste water is allowed to run across the ground. Project implementation will result in the removal of the equipment, storage facilities, and associated improvements(unless otherwise required to remain in-place) that were used to conduct the previous operations on the property to allow the construction of two (2) industrial warehouse buildings of 555,664 square feet (Building 1/Phase 1) and 1,033,565 square feet (Building 2/Phase 2) for warehouse/distribution purposes. The impact will be less than significant. e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan according to the General Plan Figure PS-7 and General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.8-1 and is not within 2 miles of a public airport. The project site is located about 4 miles northeast of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. No impact is anticipated. f) There are no private airstrips within the City. The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located about 2.5 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated. g) The City has a developed roadway network that provides emergency access and evacuation routes to existing development. The site has access to existing roadways. The City's Emergency Operation Plan, which is updated every three years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in the event of a disaster. Because the project includes at least two points of public street access and is required to comply with all applicable City codes, including local fire • ordinances, no adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 2-26-13 D.E.F.G-186 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00155 Page 31 • Less Than Sgniiicanl Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Tft'ne..' nla�ly WM man Miligalbn Signifkanl No M t Inco algid Mpsct kn 1 h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from wind-driven fires in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone found in the northern part of the City; however, the proposed project site is not located within a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone according to General Plan Figure PS-1. 9. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? C) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would • result in substantial erosion or siltation on-or off-site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on-or off-site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) mapped on a Federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) that would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Comments: a) Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD). • The project is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems. The State of California is authorized to administer various aspects of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act. The Rev 2-26-13 D,E,F,G-187 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00155 Page 32 Leas T un • SprldY6n1 La9b Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Fotantagy wm man SlgnR"nt MApalion Significant No W-1 In, atetl Nn aci Im aCt General Construction Permit treats any construction activity over 1 acre as an industrial activity, requiring a permit under the State's General NPDES permit. The State Water Resource Control Board (SWRCB), through the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), Santa Ana Region, administers these permits. Construction activities covered under the State's General Construction permit include removal of vegetation, grading, excavating, or any other activity for new development or significant redevelopment. Prior to commencement of construction of a project, a discharger must submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to obtain coverage under the General Permit. The General Permit requires all dischargers to comply with the following during construction activities, including site clearance and grading: • Develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that would specify Best Management Practices (BMPs) to prevent construction pollutants from contacting storm water and with the intent of keeping all products of erosion from moving off-site into receiving waters. • Eliminate or reduce non-storm water discharges to storm sewer systems and other waters of the nation. • Perform inspections of all BMPs. • Waste discharges include discharges of storm water and construction project discharges. A construction project for new development or significant redevelopment requires an NPDES permit. Construction project proponents are required to prepare an SWPPP. To comply with the NPDES, the project's construction contractor will be required to prepare an SWPPP during construction activities, and a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for post-construction operational management of storm water runoff. The applicant has submitted a WQMP, prepared by Fuscoe Engineering, Inc. on February 13, 2013 (and subsequently revised on April 23 and July 3, 2013) which identifies BMPs to minimize the amount of pollutants, such as eroded soils, entering the drainage system after construction. Runoff from driveways, roads and other impermeable surfaces must be controlled through an on-site drainage system. BMPs include both structural and non- structural control methods. Structural controls used to manage storm water pollutant levels include detention basins, oil/grit separators, and porous pavement. Non-structural controls focus on controlling pollutants at the source, generally through implementing erosion and sediment control plans, and various Business Plans that must be developed by any businesses that store and use hazardous materials. Practices such as periodic parking lot sweeping can substantially reduce the amount of pollutants entering the storm drain system. The following mitigation measures are required to control additional storm water effluent: Construction Activities: 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities • entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. Rev 2-26-13 D.E.F.G-188 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00155 Page 33 • Less Than Signfkant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PMentially wmt Than Signfitant Mitigation Signfnanl No Yn act Incgm,ted Im ad Im t 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by Fuscoe Engineering, Inc. on February 13, 2013 • (and subsequently revised on April 23 and July 3, 2013) to reduce pollutants during construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. Post- Construction Operational: 6) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by Fuscoe Engineering, Inc. on February 13, 2013 (and subsequently revised on April 23 and July 3, 2013) to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 7) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two year;, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. b) According to CVWD, approximately 35 percent of the City's water is currently provided from water supplies coming from the underlying Chino and Cucamonga Groundwater Basins. CVWD complies with its prescriptive water rights as managed by the Chino Basin Watermaster and will not deplete the local groundwater resource. The proposed project will not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will it interfere with recharge because it is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Pian Figure RC-3. Development of the site will require the grading and excavation, but would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 300 to 470 feet below the • ground surface. As noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.9), continued development citywide will increase water needs but will not be a significant impact. Rev 2-26-13 D.E.F.G-189 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00155 Page 34 Less Than • SignftamLess Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially wm Than SignMkant Mitigation SignC"nt No Im a<t IncXWateA M act Im act CVWD has plans to meet this increased need to the year 2030. No impacts are anticipated. C) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on the site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The project design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, the project will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site. The impact is not considered significant. d) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on-or off-site. No impacts are anticipated. e) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and • amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The project will not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site. No impacts are anticipated. f) Grading activities associated with the construction period could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surface flows during a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in surface water quality impacts. The site will be undergoing significant redevelopment; therefore, the project is required to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to minimize water pollution. The following mitigation measures shall be implemented: Grading Activities: 1) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 2) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a • Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Rev 2-26-13 D.E.F.G-190 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00155 Page 35 • Less Than Sgndkanl Lee. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Fe�entially wnn Tnan SiBndkant MI�IBdI'an Signdicanl No Im acl Inco ion Im act M act Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. g) No housing units are proposed with this project. No adverse impacts are expected. h) The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS-5. No adverse impacts are expected. i) The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm drain system designed to adequately convey floodwaters from a 100-year storm event. The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete-lined channels, and underground storm drains as shown in General Plan Figure PS-6. The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS-5. No adverse impacts are expected. D There are no oceans, lakes, or reservoirs near the project site. The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams. Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to • reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non-significance within the City. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City. No adverse impacts are expected. 10. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project. a) Physically divide an established community? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? C) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) or natural community conservation plan? Comments: a) The site is located at the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Arrow Route. The site is characterized by industrial development to the north, east, south, and west. At the northeast corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Arrow Route is an apartment complex. The site is in an area that is developed with buildings that generally do not conform to the City's current design standards as they were built prior to the incorporation of the City and adoption of the current design standards and guidelines. The site will be developed with two (2) industrial buildings that will be similar to the newer buildings in the industrial areas of the City and will be become a part of the larger community. No adverse impacts are • anticipated. b) The project site land use designation is Heavy Industrial. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan and does not interfere with any policies for environmental Rev 2-26-13 D.E.F_G-191 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00155 Page 36 Less Than • Signftsnt Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: FuteMlally wnh Than PP g Signftant Mitigation SignN"nt No Im I.. aleC kn Im ecl protection, SCAG's Compass Blueprint, or SCAG's Regional Comprehensive Plan. The proposal is for the construction of two (2) industrial warehouse buildings of 555,664 square feet (Building 1/Phase 1) and 1,033,565 square feet (Building 2/Phase 2) which is currently developed with a concrete pipe manufacturing/storage facility (operated by Ameron International). The development of the site with industrial buildings will be consistent with the land use designations as described in the Development Code and General Plan. The minimum building, parking lot, and wall setbacks; dock and storage area screening; and landscape coverage are consistent with the Development Code and the General Plan. As such, no impacts are anticipated. C) The project site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area. According to General Plan Figure RC-4 and Section 4.10 of the General Plan FPEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources; therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals. The site is a concrete pipe manufacturing/storage facility that is operated by Ameron International, Inc. There are several buildings (of various size and purpose), outdoor equipment, areas for parking and storage, and associated infrastructure on the site. Most of the existing buildings are located at the north side of the site near Arrow Route. The southeastern part of the site is primarily used for the storage of finished concrete pipes. Paving on the site is generally limited to the parking areas and the associated access driveways. To the west and south are manufacturing facilities operated by Tree Island • Wire and Gerdau, respectively. To the north are a chemical manufacturing facility operated by Air Liquide and a water storage facility operated by the Metropolitan Water District (MWD). To the east are several small commercial (e.g. ARCO and Tole-House Caf6) and industrial businesses. The Victoria Woods apartment complex is located northeast of the site at the northeast corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Arrow Route. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan. 11. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important ( ) O O (✓) mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? Comments: a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure RC-2 and Table RC-1; therefore, there is no impact. b) The site is not designated by the General Plan, Figure RC-2 and Table RC-1, as a valuable mineral resource recovery site; therefore, there is no impact. • Rev 2-26-13 n F F r._Iol Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00155 Page 37 • Leas Than Sip fficanl Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially wnnThan Significant MAigation SgnNicant No M as Inco atetl pn 1 Im acl 12. NOISE. Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in ( ) ( ) (✓) ( ) excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels? C) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? • f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, O O O (✓) would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Comments: a) The project site is within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to General Plan Figure PS-9 at build-out. The project site is located at the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Arrow Route. The street frontage along Arrow Route is about 2,600 feet while the street frontage along Etiwanda Avenue is about 1,700 feet. The principal source of noise that would impact the project site is traffic. Generally, warehouse/distribution operations are not sensitive to noise impacts. The office uses associated with such operations would be the most sensitive to noise impacts. However, due to the concrete wall construction of the buildings and the setbacks between the buildings and the streets, noise impacts will be less than significant. Noise from the site will most likely be generated by truck traffic and dock area activities— all other activities will be conducted within the buildings. The dock areas will be screened from the street(and neighboring properties) by a concrete tilt-up wall of a minimum 8 feet in height. There are no sensitive receptors immediately adjacent to the project site. Per the Noise Assessment prepared by Mestre Greve Associates on February 15, 2013, the City of Rancho Cucamonga Noise Ordinance requires that noise levels remain below 60 dBA during nighttime hours. The nearest noise sensitive area is the apartment complex, which is diagonal to the proposed project. The nearest apartments are about 350 feet from the perimeter of the project. At this distance, the proposed logistics center noise will be 49 dBA, which is well below the City requirements. Another consideration is whether the proposed activity will be substantially higher than current ambient conditions. Ambient • noise levels were measured at two sites within the apartment complex. The ambient noise levels were 62.9 dBA and 65.6 dBA (Leq) at Sites 2 and 3, respectively. Therefore, the noise levels generated by the proposed project will be well below the existing ambient noise levels. Rev 2-26-13 D.E.F.G-193 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00155 Page 38 Less Thm • SignMkant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially wM Then Sgn'fcam Mitgation Slgndioant No ".t Imorpmal Im ecl M t There will be truck traffic and, therefore, added traffic noise generated along the streets by the project. Per the Noise Assessment prepared by Mestre Greve Associates on February 15, 2013, only one of the roadway links(between the site and the surrounding area] indicates that there would be traffic noise increase greater than 3 dB due to the project. The impacted road is[a private driveway referred to as]Juneberry Drive south of Arrow Boulevard. This is a short roadway that serves industrial uses. No noise sensitive receptors are close to the roadway. Therefore, the project will not result in significant traffic noise impacts. Six of the roadway links...show potential cumulative impacts. These are roadway links that show a cumulative increase greater than 3 dB and a significant contribution due to the project of 1 dB or more. The first link listed is Arrow Boulevard between Juneberry Drive and Etiwanda Avenue. This area is bordered by the project on the south, and industrial/commercial uses on the north. Therefore, due to the lack of sensitive receptors this area will not experience a significant cumulative impact. The second highlighted line is Juneberry Drive, which due to the lack of sensitive receptors, will not be impacted. The final four links are all along Etiwanda Avenue from Arrow Boulevard to the 1-10 Freeway. This area is commercial, industrial, and undeveloped, except for the West Valley Detention Center. The detention center is surrounded by a high concrete block wall, and will not be impacted by high noise levels. The remaining area along Etiwanda Avenue is devoid of sensitive receptors. Therefore, the project will not contribute significantly to any cumulative traffic noise impacts. In any event, the mitigation measures listed below will further reduce exterior and interior • noise levels to less-than-significant levels: 1) Prior to the issuance of any grading plans a construction-related noise mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. The Plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction. 2) Business operations shall maintain a noise level at 60dB or less during the hours of 10 PM until 7 AM. No loading and unloading activities including opening, closing, or other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials, garbage cans, or other similar objects between the hours of 10 PM and 7 AM in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to residential areas. b) The proposed industrial buildings are to be constructed as speculative with no definitive users at this time. The City's Development Code requires that all industrial uses be conducted within an enclosed building; hence, no adverse operational impact to nearby uses is expected. However, at the time of occupancy the Planning Department will review each Business License for each tenant to determine the potential impacts to the surrounding residential uses and elementary schools. Per the Noise Assessment prepared by Mestre Greve Associates on February 15, 2013, as noted previously, the nearest sensitive land use is the existing apartments on the northeast corner of Arrow Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue. From the nearest apartment to the nearest building construction area is about 600 feet. Based on a distance of 600 feet, the worst-case unmitigated peak construction noise levels could be 48 to 73 dBA at the nearest homes. The average noise levels are typically 15 dB lower than the peak noise levels. Average • noise levels at the nearest existing residential buildings could be in the range of 43 to 58 dBA These are low levels of noise...the projected construction noise levels are less than the ambient noise levels at the residences. Although the noise levels associated with Rev 2-26-13 r) F F G-194 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00155 Page 39 • Leas T1µb+ Sign' Lass Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Pot tla"Y r rnan PP 9 SignK", Mnpelbn Sgndranl No h In atetl Im ' eei construction will be low at existing residences, the limits on hours contained in the City's Noise Ordinance should be considered. The City's Noise Ordinance does set limits for construction operations. As long as the project does not construct within these hours it will be consistent with the City's Noise Ordinance and no noise impacts would be anticipated. The measures listed under 12.d will mitigate the short-term noise impacts to a level of less-than-significant. C) The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic. Noise from the site will most likely be generated by truck traffic and dock area activities — all other activities will be conducted within the buildings. The dock areas will be screened from the street (and neighboring properties) by a concrete tilt-up wall of a minimum 8 feet in height. There are no sensitive receptors immediately adjacent to the project site. Per the Noise Assessment prepared by Mestre Greve Associates on February 15, 2013, the City of Rancho Cucamonga Noise Ordinance requires that noise levels remain below 60 dBA during nighttime hours. The nearest noise sensitive area is the apartment complex, which is diagonal to the proposed project. The nearest apartments are about 350 feet from the perimeter of the project. At this distance, the proposed logistics center noise will be 49 dBA, which is well below the City requirements. Another consideration is whether the proposed activity will be substantially higher than current ambient conditions. Ambient noise levels were measured at two sites within the apartment complex. The ambient noise levels were 62.9 dBA and 65.6 dBA (Leq) at Sites 2 and 3, respectively. Therefore, the • noise levels generated by the proposed project will be well below the existing ambient noise levels. There will be truck traffic and, therefore, added traffic noise generated along the streets by the project. Per the Noise Assessment prepared by Mestre Greve Associates on February 15, 2013, only one of the roadway links [between the site and the surrounding area] indicates that there would be traffic noise increase greater than 3 dB due to the project. The impacted road is [a private driveway referred to as] Juneberry Drive south of Arrow Boulevard. This is a short roadway that serves industrial uses. No noise sensitive receptors are close to the roadway. Therefore, the project will not result in significant traffic noise impacts. Six of the roadway links...show potential cumulative impacts. These are roadway links that show a cumulative increase greater than 3 dB and a significant contribution due to the project of 1 dB or more. The first link listed is Arrow Boulevard between Juneberry Drive and Etiwanda Avenue. This area is bordered by the project on the south, and industrial/commercial uses on the north. Therefore, due to the lack of sensitive receptors this area will not experience a significant cumulative impact. The second highlighted line is Juneberry Drive, which due to the lack of sensitive receptors, will not be impacted. The final four links are all along Etiwanda Avenue from Arrow Boulevard to the 1-10 Freeway. This area is commercial, industrial, and undeveloped, except for the West Valley Detention Center. The detention center is surrounded by a high concrete block wall, and will not be impacted by high noise levels. The remaining area along Etiwanda Avenue is devoid of sensitive receptors. Therefore, the project will not contribute significantly to any cumulative traffic noise impacts. In any event, the measures listed in 12.a will mitigate the short-term noise impacts to a level of less than significant. • d) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.12) indicates that during a construction phase, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction equipment, will Rev 2-26-13 D.F.F.G-195 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00155 Page 40 Lass Then • Spnftant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: so,R alt M Yuen sqn m ,, M Inco aced tr M act generate noise exceeding City standards. The following measures are provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts: 3) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 4) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 5) The perimeter screen wall shall be constructed as early as possible In the first phase. The preceding mitigation measures will reduce the disturbance created by on-site • construction equipment but do not address the potential impacts because of the transport of construction materials and debris. The following mitigation measures shall then be required: 6) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes and include appropriate noise mitigation measures. To the extent feasible,the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport. The Project is located approximately 4 miles northeast of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. No impact is anticipated. f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2.5 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated. 13. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? • b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Rev 2-26-13 D.F.F.G-196 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00155 Page 41 • Leas man Signifcant L... Issues and Supporting Information Sources: °oten0aRy wM man sgnfcant MAigatm Signftent No trn ate M t an act c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Comments: a) The project is located in a predominantly developed area and will not induce population growth. Once constructed, the proposed project will have a limited number of employees; hence, will not create a demand for additional housing as a majority of the employees will likely be hired from within the City or surrounding communities. No significant impacts are anticipated. b) The project site is a concrete pipe manufacturing/storage facility that is operated by Ameron International, Inc. There are several buildings (of various size and purpose), outdoor equipment, areas for parking and storage, and associated infrastructure on the site and therefore contains no existing housing units. No impacts are anticipated. C) The project site is a concrete pipe manufacturing/storage facility that is operated by Ameron International, Inc. There are several buildings (of various size and purpose), outdoor equipment, areas for parking and storage, and associated infrastructure on the site. No impacts are anticipated. • 14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: a) Fire protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) b) Police protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) C) Schools? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) d) Parks? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) e) Other public facilities? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Comments: a) The project site, located at the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Arrow Route, would be served by Fire Station #3 at 12158 Base Line Road located about 2 miles northwest of the site and Fire Station #4 at 11297 Jersey Boulevard located about 1.4 miles to the west of the site. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the project to lessen the future demand and impacts to fire services. No impacts are anticipated. b) Additional police protection is not required as the addition of the project will not change • the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled as the project site is within an area that is regularly patrolled. Rev 2-26-13 D.E.F.G-197 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00155 Page 42 Less Then • Signftwt Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: S°�,, 'n", M otio„ sognf� I. M M h C) The site is in a developed area currently served by the Etiwanda School District and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District. The project will be required to pay School Fees as prescribed by State law prior to the issuance of building permits. No impacts are anticipated. d) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park is Garcia Park at 13150 Garcia Drive located approximately 0.75-mile northeast of the project site The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees. No impacts are anticipated. e) The proposed project will utilize existing public facilities. The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services. According to the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.14), there will be a projected increase in library space demand but with the implementation of standard conditions the increase in Library Services would be mitigated to less than significant impact. Additionally, the Paul A. Biane Library has an additional 14,000 square foot shell of vacant library space that is planned for future Library use. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan • for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. Therefore no adverse impact is expected. 15. RECREATION. Would the project: a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Comments: a) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park is Garcia Park at 13150 Garcia Drive located approximately 0.75-mile northeast of the project site. This project is not proposing any new housing or large employment generator that would cause an increase in the use of parks or other recreational facilities. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees. No impacts are anticipated. b) See a) response above. • Rev 2-26-13 D.E.F.G-198 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00155 Page 43 • Saaa Than SipWfth Leas Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: aaemxny wan Than PP g Spndwn rpation Sgniftant M No act Mwoco ted pn t Mn act 16. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project: a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non-motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) program, including, but not limited to a level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? C) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that result in substantial safety risks? • d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses(e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities. Comments: a) Implementation of the proposed project will generate 1,735 vehicle trips daily. The proposed project is the construction of two (2) industrial warehouse buildings of 555,664 square feet (Building 1/Phase 1) and 1,033,565 square feet (Building 2/Phase 2). According to the Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by Kunzman Associates, Inc. on August 6, 2013, Phase 1 is projected to generate approximately 1,220 daily vehicle trips in Passenger Car Equivalents [all trucks have been multiplied by passenger car equivalents 1.5, 2.0, and 3.0 for 2-, 3-, and 4-axle trucks respectively], 80 Passenger Car Equivalents of which will occur during the morning peak hour and 86 Passenger Car Equivalents of which will occur during the evening peak hour; Phase 11 development is projected to generate approximately 2,242 additional daily vehicle trips in Passenger Car Equivalents, 143 additional Passenger Car Equivalents of which will occur during the morning peak hour and 162 additional Passenger Car Equivalents of which will occur during the evening peak hour. As noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.16), continued development will contribute to the traffic load in the Rancho Cucamonga area. The proposed project is consistent with • the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. The project is in an area that is mostly developed with street improvements existing or included in project design. The project will not create a substantial increase in the number of vehicle Rev 2-26-13 D,E,F,G-199 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00155 Page 44 S Tftan • SgnRirant Less Issues and Suppg Send cant M ortin Information Sources: 1=mantwny wm Tnan iBa on SBn an No IMPW Inco eted Im act Mn act trips, traffic volume, or congestion at intersections. The project site will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per City roadway standards. In addition, the City has established a Transportation Development fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of building permits. Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation. No impacts are anticipated. b) According to the Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by Kunzman Associates, Inc. on August 6, 2013, each 1,000 square feet of building floor area will generate 1.68 two-way peak hour trips daily. In November 2004, San Bernardino County voters passed the Measure I extension which requires local jurisdictions to impose appropriate fees on development for their fair share toward regional transportation improvement projects. On May 18, 2005, the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted a Comprehensive Transportation Fee Schedule updating these development impact fees. As a result, the San Bernardino County Congestion Management Agency waived the Congestion Management Plan (CMP)Traffic Impact Analysis reporting requirement. This project will be required, as a condition of approval, to pay the adopted transportation development fee prior to issuance of building permit. The project is in an area that is mostly developed with all street improvements existing. The project will not negatively impact the level of service standards on adjacent arterials. The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk)along the street frontage of the site. No impacts are anticipated. C) Located about 4 miles northeasterly of the Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the • flight path and will not change air traffic patterns. No impacts are anticipated. d) The project is in an area that is mostly developed. The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. The project design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming uses. The project will, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards because of a design feature. No impacts are anticipated. e) The project will be designed to provide access for all emergency vehicles during construction and upon completion of the project and will therefore not create an inadequate emergency access. No impacts are anticipated. f) The design of the project includes, or the project will be conditioned to provide, features supporting transportation and vehicle trip reduction including a bus bay and bus stop shelter at Etiwanda Avenue (near the intersection with Arrow Route), bicycle racks at each office area, preferential parking for car/vanpools, pedestrian connections to the public sidewalks, etc. No impacts are anticipated. 17. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? • Rev 2-26-13 D,E,F,G-200 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00155 Page 45 • LesaifThen Sgncant Lesa Issues and Supporting Information Sources: 1.0.11, wnh Than PP g Sgnd and MRiBal on Sgn raM No hn xt htc ateE Nn t M act C) Require or result in the construction of new storm ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) regulations related to solid waste? Comments: • a) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-1 and RP-4 treatment plants. The RP-1 capacity is sufficient to exceed the additional development within the western and southern areas of the City. The RP-4 treatment plant has a potential ultimate capacity of 28 mgd which is considered more than adequate to capacity to treat all increases in wastewater generation for buildout of the General Plan. The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated. b) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within the City of Ontario, neither of which is at capacity. The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated. C) All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. No impacts are anticipated. d) The project is served by the CVWD water system. There is currently a sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this project. No impacts are anticipated. e) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which is at capacity. No impacts are anticipated. • Rev 2-26-13 D,E,F,G-201 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00155 Page 46 Lee.Than • SignKnant Le.. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially wnn Than pP 9 Significant MRigation Signdicant No IrnIncoMEatw Im act hn 1 f) Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs. No impacts are anticipated. g) This project complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste. The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939. No impacts are anticipated. 18. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a • project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? C) Does the project have environmental effects that will ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Comments: a) The site is not located in an area of sensitive biological resources as identified on the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Figure RC-4. The project site is located at the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Arrow Route. The site is characterized by industrial development to the north, east, south, and west. At the northeast corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Arrow Route is an apartment complex. The site is a concrete pipe manufacturing/storage facility that is operated by Ameron International, Inc. According to the General Plan Figure RC-4, and Section 4.4 of the General Plan FPEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources; therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals. There are several buildings(of various size and purpose), outdoor equipment, areas for parking and storage, and associated infrastructure on the site. Most of the existing buildings are located at the north side of the site near Arrow Route. The southeastern part of the site is primarily used for the storage of finished concrete pipes. Paving on the site is generally limited to the parking areas and the associated access driveways. To the west and south are manufacturing facilities operated by Tree Island Wire and Gerdau, respectively. To the north are a chemical manufacturing facility operated by Air Liquide and a water storage facility operated by the Metropolitan Water District (MWD). To the east are several small • commercial (e.g. ARCO and Tole-House Cafe) and industrial businesses. The Victoria Woods apartment complex is located northeast of the site at the northeast corner of Rev 2-26-13 D,E,F,G-202-. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00155 Page 47 • Lass Than Signircant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially wish Than PP 9 SgnAicant Muigation Sign6cant No his act IncorWsted his P= y wt Etiwanda Avenue and Arrow Route. Based on previous development, surrounding development, and the construction of infrastructure in the immediate vicinity, it is unlikely that any endangered or rare species would inhabit the site. No impacts are anticipated. b) If the proposed project were approved, then the applicant would be required to develop the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. The 2010 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of build-out in the City and Sphere-of-Influence. The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to Aesthetics, Agriculture and Forest Resources, Air Quality, Climate Change and Mineral Resources. Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources; however, they would not reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels. As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)). These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use projects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space. With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is required. C) Development of the site under the proposed land use change would not cause substantial • adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. The Initial Study identifies construction-related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact. Proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels. Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality would be short-term and would cease once construction activities were completed. The Initial Study identified potentially significant impacts associated with the exposure of people to increased noise levels. Mitigation measures contained in this Initial Study will ensure impacts are at less-than-significant levels. EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier PEIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive and/or have been attached (on a CD) to this document for review: (T) General Plan FPEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified May 19, 2010) (T) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) • (T) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH#88020115, certified January 4, 1989) Rev 2-26-13 D,E,F,G-203 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00155 Page 48 (T) Industrial Area Specific Plan EIR • (Certified September 19, 1981) (T) Air Impact and Climate Change Assessment (MIG/Hogle-Ireland, February 2013) (T) Arborist Evaluation/Report (Earthwise Arborist, April 23, 2013) (T) Health Risk Assessment (MIG/Hogle-Ireland, February 2013) (T) Noise Assessment (Mestre Greve Associates, February 15, 2013) (T) Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (URS, July 25, 2012) (T) Phase II Soil Sampling (URS, August 30, 2012) (T) Traffic Impact Analysis (Kunzman Associates, Inc., August 6, 2013) (T) Water Quality Management Plan (Fuscoe Engineering, Inc., July 3, 2013) • • Rev 2-26-13 D,E,F,G-204 • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00155 Page 49 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study. 1 acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures. Further, I have revised the project plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects would occur. Applicants Signature: Date: 11���J PrintName and Title: 1s�iNM- -A— < • • Rev 2-26-13 D,E,F,G-205 City of Rancho Cucamonga in MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: Development Review DRC2013-00155 This Mitigation Monitoring Program(MMP)has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed project. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components - This MMP contains the following elements: 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project. 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring • progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management- The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project planner, assigned by the Planning Director, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures - The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants'fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. 2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action,what action will be taken and when,and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address: City of Rancho Cucamonga - Lead Agency Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive • Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 D,E,F,G-206 Mitigation Monitoring Program DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00155 Page 2 • 3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed, as determined by the project planner or responsible City department,to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner. 4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development. 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. 7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to • hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The Department shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time. 9. In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or Planning Director prior to the issuance of building permits. • D,E,F,G-207 0 0 0 MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART 111) Project File No.: Development Review DRC2013-00155 Applicant: MIG/Hoole-Ireland for Goodman Rancho SPE. LLC Initial Study Prepared by: Mike Smith, Associate Planner Date: September 10, 2013 Mitigation Measures No./ Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Momtorm Fre uenc Verification Verification Date/Initials Non-Com liance Short Term(Construction)Emissions 1) Prior to issuance of building permits, the PD/BO B Review of plans D 2 project proponent shall submit, to the satisfaction of the Planning Department, a Coating Restriction Plan (CRP), consistent with South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) guidelines and a letter agreeing to include in any construction p contracts and/or subcontracts a requirement M that the contractors adhere to the CRP. The CRP measures shall be implemented to the 61 satisfaction of City Building Director. These N may include the following: 0 oD • That volatile organic compounds(VOC) of proposed architectural coatings not exceed 25 for interior applications. • That volatile organic compounds(VOC) of proposed architectural coatings not exceed 75 g/I for exterior applications. This measure shall conform to the performance standard that emissions of volatile organic compounds from application of interior or exterior coatings shall not exceed the daily emissions thresholds established by the South Coast Air Quality Management District. The CRP shall specify use of High- Volume, Low Pressure (HVLP) spray guns for application of coatings. Page 1 of 13 Mitigation Measures No.l Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/Initials Non-Compliance 2) All construction equipment shall be maintained PD C Review of plans A/C 2/4 in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 3) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, PD/BO C Review of plans C 2 the developer shall submit Construction Plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South m Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD)as well as City Planning staff. Ll N4) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed PD C Review of plans A/C 2/4 c performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 5) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance BO B Review of plans A/C 2 standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 6) All construction equipment shall comply with BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 roads. • Phase grading to prevent the BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. Page 2 of 13 • 0 0 Mitigation Measures No./ Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/Initials Non-Compliance • Schedule activities to minimize the BO C Review of plans A/C 214 amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in BO C Review of plans A 4 accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering ractices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule B0 C During construction q 4 established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high BO C During construction A 4 winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard BO C During Construction A 4 p ratio on soils haul trucks or cover m payloads using tarps or other suitable ?� means. 7) The site shall be treated with water or other N B0 C During construction A q soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD CI and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce Particulate Matter (PMio) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 8) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by B0 C During construction A q SCAQMD and RWQCB)shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. 9) The construction contractor shall utilize BO C Review of plans A/C 4 electric or clean alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible. 10) The construction contractor shall ensure that 80 C Review of plans A/C 2/4 construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. Page 3 of 13 Mitigation Measures No.I Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/Initials Non-Compliance Long Term Emissions 11) Prior to issuance of occupancy permits or PD B Review of plan C 2/3 business licenses, future tenants of the and/or proposed project shall submit a report to the Planning Department identifying all diesel business license engine powered trucks within the occupant's fleet and verification that vehicles have been equipped with a filter that reduces oxides of nitrogen by a minimum of 25 percent below typical operating conditions as verified by the California Air Resources Board through executive order, or that vehicles have been equipped with control technologies or powered by engines that emit oxides of nitrogen at levels that will not otherwise cause the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) daily threshold for oxides M of nitrogen. This report shall be updated upon n occupancy by a new tenant. Ll 12) Provide preferential parking to high occupancy PD B Review of plan C 2 1 vehicles and shuttle services. N 13) Improve thermal integrity of the buildings and PD B Review of plan C 2 reduce thermal load with automated time clocks or occupant sensors. 14) Landscape with native and/or drought- PD B Review of plan C 2 resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 15) Provide lighter color roofing and road PD B Review of plan C 2 materials and tree planting programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC-01 measure. 16) All industrial and commercial facilities shall BO C Review of plans A 4 post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods(i.e., in excess of 10 minutes). 17) All industrial and commercial facilities shall PD C Review of plans A/C 2/3 designate preferential parking for vanpools. Page 4 of 13 0 0 0 Mitigation Measures No.1 Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/Initials Non-Compliance 18) All industrial and commercial site tenants with PD C Review of plans D 2/3 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas. 19) All industrial and commercial site tenants with PD C Review of plans D 2/3 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible. =trees, moved shall be replaced PD B Review of plans C/D 2/3 one-to-one basis, of a Mill ze. 111 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources 0 are encountered before or during grading, the ^' developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take i appropriate measures to protect or preserve ^� them for study. With the assistance of the J N archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect PD/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to PD/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the PD/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 archaeological heritage of the area. • Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with P/D B/C Review of A/D Section 21083.2 Archeological Plans/Report During resources of CEOA to eliminate adverse Construction project effects on significant, important, Page 5 of 13 Mitigation Measures No.I Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/Initials Non-Compliance and unique prehistoric resources, including but not limited to, avoiding archeological sites, capping or covering site with soil, planning the site as a park or green space or paying an in-kind miti ation fee. • Prepare a technical resources PD C Review of report A/D 3/4 management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report, with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or PD B Review of report A/D 4 animal fossils) are encountered before or D during grading, the developer will retain a :" qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate I measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a w report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained PD rB Review of report A/D 4 and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbingactivities. • Should fossils be found within an area BO Review of report A/D 4 being cleared or graded, divert earth- disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should Page 6 of 13 0 0 0 Mitigation Measures No./ Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/initials I Non-Compliance immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all PD D Review of report D 3 recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of PD D Review of report D 3 Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy to the report to San Bernardino Count Museum. 1) The site shall be treated with water or other BO C During construction A 4 soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant it landscaping as soon as possible. ?� 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept BO C During construction A 4 according to a schedule established by the N City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with A vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when BO C During construction A 4 wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM10 emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by BO C During construction A 4 SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. Short Term(Construction) GHG Emissions 1) The project must comply with all rules that BO CA assist in reducing short-term air pollutant During construction 4 emission in compliance with SCAWMD Rule Page 7 of 13 Mitigation Measures No./ Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/Initials Non-Compliance 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil-stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 2) The construction contractor shall select BO C During construction A 4 construction equipment based on low- emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures'specification. 3) Trucks shall not idle continuously for more BO C During construction A 4 than 5 minutes. 4) Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be BO C During construction A 4 utilized in lieu of gasoline- or diesel-powered engines where feasible. p 5) Construction should be timed so as not to BO C During construction A 4 m interfere with peak-hour traffic. 6) Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be BO C During construction A 4 i supported and encouraged for construction ^j crew. J Ln Long Term(Operational) GHG Emissions 7) Construction and Building materials shall be BO A During Construction C 2 produced and/or manufactured locally. Use "Green Building Materials" such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled, and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low-volatile-organic-compound (VOC) materials. 8) Design all buildings to exceed California BO A During Construction C 2 Building Code Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of: • Increased insulation • Limit air leakage through the structure • Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling Page 8 of 13 0 0 . Mitigation Measures No.I Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/initials Non-Compliance equipment, light fixtures, and appliances • Landscape and developed site utilizing shade, prevailing winds and landscaping • Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems • Install light colored 'cool" roofs and cool pavements • Install solar or light emitting diodes (LED's)for outdoor lighting. 9) Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and include the following: • Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in p compliance with the City of Rancho m Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape ?� Ordinance. Ll N • Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available and/or install O) the infrastructure to deliver and use reclaimed water. • Design building to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets, dual flush toilets and waterless urinals/water heaters. • Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non-vegetated surfaces. 10) Reuse and recycle construction and CE A Review of plans C 2 demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educated employees about reducing waste and about recycling. Page 9 of 13 Mitigation Measures No.I Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/initials Non-Compliance Construction Activities 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 permit applicant shall submit to Building Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are 0 initiated through completion of grading. This m Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil N exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern Cafrfomia, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, BO B/C/DA/C 214 street cleaning will be performed prior to Review of plans storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 214 identified in the Water Quality Management Page 10 of 13 0 0 0 Mitigation Measures No.I Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/Initials Non-Compliance Plan prepared by Fuscoe Engineering, Inc. on July 3, 2013) to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 6) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. Grading Activities 7) Prior to issuance of building permits, the BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 p applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for m approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and G1 identifying Best Management Practices I (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce r1' pollutants into the storm drain system to the 00 maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 8) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Page 11 of 13 Mitigation Measures No./ Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/Initials Non-Compliance 1) Prior to the issuance of any grading plans a construction-related noise mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. The Plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction. 2) Business operations shall maintain a noise level at 60dB or less during the hours of 10 PM until 7 AM. No loading and unloading activities including opening, closing, or other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials, garbage cans, or other similar objects between the hours of 10 PM and 7 AM in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to residential areas. 3) Construction or grading shall not take place BO C A 4 n between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. During construction L) on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any I time on Sunday or a national holiday. N 4) Construction or grading noise levels shall not BO CA 4 exceed the standards specked in Development Code Section 17.66.050, as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specked in Development Code Section 17.66.050. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. Page 12 of 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mitigation Measures No.I Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/Initials Non-Compliance 5) The perimeter screen wall shall be PD C During construction A A constructed as early as possible in the first phase. 6) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place PO/BO C During construction A 4/7 between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. v Key to Checklist Abbreviations n in CDD-CommunityDevelopment Director or designee A-With Each New Development A-On-site Inspection 1 -Withhold Recordation of Final Map N PD-Planning Director or designee B-Prior To Construction B-Other Agency Permit/Approval 2-Withhold Grading or Building Permit N O CE-City Engineer or designee C-Throughout Construction C-Plan Check 3-Withhold Certificate of Occupancy BO-Building Official or designee D-On Completion D-Separate Submittal(Reports/Studies/Plans) 4-Stop Work Order PO-Police Captain or designee E-Operating 5-Retain Deposit or Bonds FC-Fire Chief or designee 6-R voke CUP 7-Citation Page 13 of 13 • TATE OF CALIFORNIA EdMUnd O Brown, i �'ovemnr NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE COMMISSION 1550 Harbor Boulevard RANCHO ''/�nu( s West Sacramento,CA 95691 CRY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (916)373-3715 V (916)373-5471 —FAX e-mail: ds_nahc®pacbell.net September 25, 2013 SEP 3 0 2013 Mr. Mike Smith, Associate Planner GCEIYG� _ PLANNING City of Rancho Cucamonga RICG P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 RE: SCH#2013091067 CEQA Notice of Preparation (NOP); proposed Negative Declaration for the 'Development Review (DRC2013-00155; 2 Industrial/Warehouse Buildings at SWC Ettwanda/Arrow (Ameron Sites) Project; " located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga; San Bernardino County, California Dear Mr. Smith: The Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) has reviewed the Court decision (170 Cal App 3rd 604), the court held that the NAHC has • jurisdiction and special expertise, as a state agency, over affected Native American resources impacted by proposed projects, including archaeological places of religious significance to Native Americans, and to Native American burial sites. The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) states that any project which includes archeological resources, is a significant effect requiring the preparation of an EIR (CEQA guidelines 15064.5(b). To adequately comply with this provision and mitigate project-related impacts on archaeological resources, the Commission recommends the following actions be required: Contact the appropriate Information Center for a record search to determine :If a part or all of the area of project effect (APE) has been previously surveyed for cultural places(s), The NAHC recommends that known traditional cultural resources recorded on or adjacent to the APE be listed in the draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR). If an additional archaeological inventory survey is required, the final stage is the preparation of a professional report detailing the findings and recommendations of the records search and field survey. We suggest that this be coordinated with the NAHC, if possible. The final report containing site forms, site significance, and mitigation measurers should be submitted immediately to • the planning department. All information regarding site locations, Native EXHIBIT W D,E,F,G-221 American human remains, and associated funerary objects should be in a separate confidential addendum, and not be made available for pubic disclosure • pursuant to California Government Code Section 6254.10. A list of appropriate Native American Contacts for consultation concerning the project site has been provided and is attached to this letter to determine if the proposed active might impinge on any cultural resources. Lack of surface evidence of archeological resources does not preclude their subsurface existence. Lead agencies should include in their mitigation plan provisions for the identification and evaluation of accidentally discovered archeological resources, pursuant to California Health & Safety Code Section 7050.5 and California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) §15064.5(f). In areas of identified archaeological sensitivity, a certified archaeologist and a culturally affiliated Native American, with knowledge in cultural resources, should monitor all ground-disturbing activities. Also, California Public Resources Code Section 21083.2 require documentation and analysis of archaeological items that meet the standard in Section 15064.5 (a)(b)(f). Lead agencies should include in their mitigation plan provisions for the disposition of recovered artifacts, in consultation with culturally affiliated Native Americans. Lead agencies should include provisions for discovery of Native American human remains in their mitigation plan. Health and Safety Code §7050.5, CEQA §15064.5(e), and Public Resources Code §5097.98 mandates the process to be followed in the event of • an accidental discovery of any human remains in a location other than a dedicated cemetery. i cerely, Dave Singl Program An CC: State Clearinghouse Attachment: Native American Contacts list • D,E,F,G-222 Native American Contacts San Bernardino County September 25, 2013 changa Band of Mission Indians Gabrielino/Tongva Nation ul Macarro, Cultural Resources Manager Sandonne Goad, Chairperson O. Box 1477 Luiseno P.O. Box 86908 Gabrielino Tongva Temecula , CA 92593 Los Angeles , CA 90086 (951) 770-8100 sgoad(Pgabrielino-tongva.com pmacarro @ pechanga-nsn. 951-845-0443 gov (951) 506-9491 Fax Ramona Band of Cahuilla Mission Indians Morongo Band of Mission Indians Joseph Hamilton, Chairman William Madrigal, Jr.,Cuitural Resources Manager P.O. Box 391670 Cahuilla 12700 Pumarra Road Cahuilla Anza , CA 92539 Banning , CA 92220 Serrano admin@ ramonatribe.com (951) 201-1866- cell (951) 763-4105 wmadrigal@morongo-nsn. (951) 763-4325 Fax gov (951) 572-6004 Fax San Manuel Band of Mission Indians San Manuel Band of Mission Indians Carla Rodriguez, Chairwoman Daniel McCarthy, M.S.., Director-CRM Dept. 26569 Community Center Drive Serrano 26569 Community Center. Drive Serrano Highland , CA 92346 Highland , CA 92346 (909) 864-8933 (909) 864-8933, Ext 3248 909) 864-3724 - FAX dmccarthy@sanmanuel-nsn. 9) 864-3370 Fax gov 6 (909) 862-5152 Fax abrieleno/TongvtSan Gabriel Band of Mission Serrano Nation of Mission Indians Anthony Morales, hairperson Goldie Walker, Chairwoman PO Box 693 Gabrielino Tongva P.O. Box 343 Serrano San Gabriel , CA 91778 Patton CA 92369 GTTri balcou nci I @aol.com (626) 286-1632 (909) 528-9027 or (626) 286-1758 - Home (909) 528-9032 (626) 286-1262 -FAX This list Is current only as of the data of this document. Disidbutldn of this MA dos not rellsva any parson of the statutory responsibility ae deflned In Section 7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code, Section 5097.94 of Drs Public Resources Cods and Section 5087.90 of the Public Resources Cods. S 0-S s list a only applicable for contacting local Native Americans with regard to cultural resources for the proposed CHM2013091067;CERA Notice of Completion;proposed Negative Declaration for the Development Review(DRC2013-00155)(Ameron Sites)Project;located In the City of Rancho Cucamonga;San Bernardino County,California. D,E,F,G-223 Native American Contacts San Bernardino County September 25, 2013 Ernest H. Siva • Morongo Band of Mission Indians Tribal Elder 9570 Mias Canyon Road Serrano Banning I CA 92220 Cahuilla siva@dishmail.net (951) 849-4676 SOBOBA BAND OF LUISENO INDIANS Joseph Ontiveros, Cultural Resource Department P.O. BOX 487 Luiseno San Jacinto . CA 92581 jontiveros @ soboba-nsn.gov (951) 663-5279 (951) 654-5544, ext 4137 Gabrielino frongva Nation Sam Dunlap, Cultural Resorces Director P.O. Box 86908 Gabrielino Tongva Los Angeles , CA 90086 samdunlap(P earthlink.net 909-262-9351 • This list Is wmnt only as of the data of this locum rlL Distribution of this flat does not relieve any person of the sMuilory neponsibi ty as dNlned In Section 7555.5 of the Hedth and Sally Code, Section 5597.4 of the Public Resources Code and section 5557.95 of the Public Resources Code, his list a only applicable for contacting local Native Americans with regard to cultural resources for the proposed • SCHs2013091057;CEGA Notice of completion;proposed Negative Declaration for the Development Review(DRC2013-00165)(Ameron Sites) Project;located In the City of Rancho Cucamonga;Sen Bernardino County,California. D,E,F,G-224 T CITY OF _ _ ;; = ONTARIO EAST"B" STREET, CIVIC CENTER ONTARIO ''kb . �A CALIFORNIA 91764-4105 909 395-2000 �oaaEo ( ) FAX(909)395-2070 PAUL S.LEON CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOM CHRIS HUGHES MAYOR GTY MANAGER JIM W. BOWMAN OCT 2 4 2013 MARY E.WIRTES, MMC MAYOR PRO TEM CITY CLERK October 21, 201 CENED - pLANNINCAME qRR. MIIERHISER ALAN D.WAPNER DEBRA DORST-PORADA PAUL VINCENT AVILA COUNCIL MEMBERS City of Rancho Cucamonga Attn: Planning Department P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91729 RE: NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR SUBTPM19448 AND DRC2013-00155 LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ARROW ROUTE AND ETIWANDA • AVENUE (APN:0229-131-04,-17,AND-25) IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Thank you for allowing the City of Ontario an opportunity to review and comment on the above referenced project. After reviewing the mitigated negative declaration, the City requests the following comments pertaining to the Traffic Impact Analysis submitted with the project by Kurtzman Associates, Inc. dated August 6, 2013 be addressed: I. In general, please make sure that all of your turning movements are properly coded in the modeling software. For example, Etiwanda Avenue at Fourth Street should show all left turn movements as protected, not permitted. Please revise accordingly. 2. In general, please make sure that all movements pertaining to the freeway on/off ramps are appropriately coded in the model. For example, at intersection #12, the southbound right-tum should be free, not included. Please revise accordingly. 3. The traffic impact analysis does not show the intersection at Distribution Way and Etiwanda Avenue, or Ontario Mills Parkway and Etiwanda Avenue. Please verify that the study accurately places traffic from these two locations onto Etiwanda Avenue. 4. The study includes the Wal-Mart Project to the north; however, is the traffic included • in the future for the project that is currently under construction at the southwest comer of Ontario Mills Parkway and Etiwanda Avenue? Please verify. www.di.ontario.ca.us D,E,F,G-225 ®Printed on recycled paper. Planning Department October 21, 2013 • Page 2 In addition, until such time as the ultimate storm drain system downstream of the site is constructed, the subject project must detain the Q-100 flow onsite such that the post condition flow is less than the existing condition flow. We appreciate being involved in the environmental review of the project and look forward to continued communications regarding this project. If you have any questions regarding our comments, please contact me at (909) 395-2036, or Richard Ayala, Senior Planner, at(909) 395-2421. Sincerely, ONTARIO PLANNING DEPARTMENT �y�L� cS�1 ann g Director • JLB/RA • D,E,f,G-226 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS FLOOD CONTROL • LAND DEVELOPMENT&CONSTRUCTION a OPERATIONS SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT • SURVEYOR • TRANSPORTATION COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO East Third Street • San Bernardino,CA 92415-0835 . (909)3878104 GERRY NEWCOMBE Fax (9D9)387.8130 Director of Public Works October 16, 2013 File: 10(ENV)4.01 City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA. 91729 RE: CEQA - NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 19448 FOR THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA To whom it may concern: Thank you for giving the San Bernardino County Department of Public Works the opportunity to comment on the above-referenced project. We received this Notice on September 23, 2013. Pursuant to our review, the following comments are provided: Traffic Division (Eloy Ruvalcaba. PWE 111, 909-387-8186): 1. The traffic study should analyze the signalized intersections of Etiwanda Ave at Valley Blvd • and Etiwanda Ave at Napa St which will be affected by the proposed development. Environmental Manaaement Division (Brandy Wood. Ecoloaist, 909-387-7971) 1. The Initial Study does not address impacts to nesting birds that would be protected by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918 and California Department of Fish and Game Code 3513. If you have any questions, please contact the individuals who provided the specific comment, as listed above. Sincerely, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONQ ANNESLEYIGN IUS, P.E. Deputy Director- Environmental & Construction OCT 2 1 2013 ARI:PE:nh/CEOAComments_MND_RanchoCucamonga_TPM19448 RECEIVED - PLANNING • Board of Supervisors GREGORY C.DEVEREAUX ROBERT A.LOVINGOOD ... ...First DisVict JAMES RAMOS........ .. .... .. . .Third District Chief Executive Officer JANICE RUTHERFORD........... ..Second District GARY C.OVITT. .... ..... .. ..Fourth District JOSIE GONZALES .... ...._... .......Fifth District D,E,F,G-227 a� KUNZMA N AS�*, kATT-S-* IKQ OVER 35 YEARS OF EXCELLENT SERVICE November 4, 2013 Mr.Ward Mace GOODMAN BIRTCHER 18201 Von Karman Avenue,Suite 1170 Irvine,CA 92612 Dear Mr. Mace: INTRODUCTION The firm of Kunzman Associates, Inc. is pleased to submit this supplemental traffic analysis for the Goodman Logistics Center, Rancho Cucamonga, Traffic Imoact Analysis prepared by Kunzman Associates, Inc. (August 6, 2013). The project location map is provided on Figure 1. This supplemental analysis is in response to a comment letter from the County of San Bernardino Department of Public Works dated October 16, 2013 and a comment letter from the City of Ontario Planning Department dated October 21,2013. This report summarizes our methodology, analysis, and findings. Although this is a technical report, • every effort has been made to write the report clearly and concisely. To assist the reader with those terms unique to transportation engineering,a glossary of terms is provided within Appendix A. SUMMARY OF IMPACTS Improvements that will eliminate all anticipated roadway operational deficiencies throughout the study area have been identified. Etiwanda Avenue(NS)at: 4th Street(EW)-#11 - Construct an additional northbound through travel lane (General Plan improvement) - Construct an additional southbound through travel lane (General Plan improvement) Etiwanda Avenue(NS)at: Napa Street(EW)-#1 Construct an additional northbound through travel lane(Requires spot widening) Construct an additional southbound through travel lane (Requires spot widening) Illi To &Cou y ROAD,Sulu 34 • ORAW(-CALIMRNM 92868 (714)9738383 W W WSRAMC-ENGINEER.COM EXHIBIT X D,E,F,G-228 Mr.Ward Mace • GOODMAN BIRTCHER November 4,2013 Ontario Mills Parkway/Valley Boulevard (EW)-k3 - Restripe an additional southbound left turn lane(Currently constructed but needs to be restriped) The project fair share percentages have been calculated for the improvement locations. The project share is based on the proportion of project peak hour traffic contributed to the improvement location relative to the total new peak hour traffic volumes. As mitigation for the potential traffic impacts;the proposed project shall contribute on a fair share basis. COMMENT LETTERS The County of San Bernardino Department of Public Works and the City of Ontario Planning Department comment letters are provided in Appendix B. County of San Bernardino Department of Public Works: Comment 1: The traffic study should analyze the signalized intersections of Etiwanda Avenue at Valley Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue at Napa Street which will be affected by the proposed development. • Response 1: The supplemental traffic analysis includes Etiwanda Avenue (NS) at Napa Street(EW)and Etiwanda Avenue(NS)at Valley Boulevard(EW). City of Ontario Planning Department: Comment 1: In General,please make sure that all your turning movements are properly coded in the modeling software. For example, Etiwanda Avenue at Fourth Street should show all left turn movements as protected, not permitted. Please revise accordingly. Response 1: Etiwanda Avenue (NS) at 4th Street (EW) traffic signal phasing has been updated and the analysis is provided in this supplemental traffic analysis. Comment 2: In general, please make sure that all movements pertaining to the freeway on/off ramps are appropriately coded on the model. For example, at intersection #12, the southbound right-turn should be free, not included. Please revise accordingly. Response 2: Etiwanda Avenue (NS) at 1-10 Freeway WB Ramps (EW) and Etiwanda Avenue (NS) at 1-10 Freeway EB Ramps (EW) intersection geometry has been updated and the analysis is provided in this supplemental traffic analysis. Comment 3: The traffic impact analysis does not show the intersection at Distribution Way and Etiwanda Avenue, or Ontario Mills Parkway and Etiwanda Avenue. Please verify that the study accurately places traffic from these two locations onto Etiwanda Avenue. • WWW.TRAFFIC-ENCINEER.COM 2 D,E,F,G-229 Mr.Ward Mace GOODMAN BIRTCHER • November 4, 2013 Response 3: The supplemental traffic analysis includes Etiwanda Avenue (NS) at Distribution Way (EW) and Etiwanda Avenue (NS) at Ontario Mills Parkway/Valley Boulevard (EW). Comment 4: The study includes the Wal-Mart Project to the north; however, is the traffic included in the future for the project that is currently under construction at the southwest corner of Ontario Mills Parkway and Etiwanda Avenue? Please verify. Response 4: Per discussions with the City of Ontario and the traffic modeler,the project currently under construction at the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Ontario Mills Parkway/Valley Boulevard is included in the future traffic data. EXISTING CONDITIONS The study area intersections currently operate within acceptable Levels of Service during the peak hours (see Table 1). Existing delay worksheets are provided in Appendix E. EXISTING PLUS PROJECT-PHASES I&II CONDITIONS For Existing Plus Project— Phases I & II traffic conditions, the study area intersections are projected to operate within acceptable Levels of Service during the peak hours (see Table 2). Existing Plus Project— • Phases I&II delay worksheets are provided in Appendix E. OPENING YEAR(2014)WITHOUT PROJECT CONDITIONS For Opening Year(2014)Without Project traffic conditions,the study area intersections are projected to operate within acceptable Levels of Service during the peak hours (see Table 3). Opening Year (2014) Without Project delay worksheets are provided in Appendix E. OPENING YEAR(2014)WITH PROJECT—PHASE I CONDITIONS For Opening Year (2014) With Project — Phase I traffic conditions, the study area intersections are projected to operate within acceptable Levels of Service during the peak hours (see Table 4). Opening Year(2014)With Project—Phase I delay worksheets are provided in Appendix E. OPENING YEAR(2015)WITHOUT PROJECT CONDITIONS For Opening Year(2015)Without Project traffic conditions,the study area intersections are projected to operate within acceptable Levels of Service during the peak hours (see Table 5). Opening Year (2015) Without Project delay worksheets are provided in Appendix E. W W W.TRAFFIC-ENGINEER.COM • 3 D,E,F,G-230 Mr.Ward Mace • GOODMAN BIRTCHER November 4,2013 OPENING YEAR(2015)WITH PROJECT—PHASES I&II CONDITIONS For Opening Year (2015) With Project—Phases I & II traffic conditions, the study area intersections are projected to operate within acceptable Levels of Service during the peak hours (see Table 6). Opening Year(2015)With Project—Phases I&II delay worksheets are provided in Appendix E. YEAR 2035 WITHOUT PROJECT CONDITIONS For Year 2035 Without Project traffic conditions, the study area intersections are projected to operate within acceptable Levels of Service during the peak hours, except for the following study area intersections that are projected to operate at unacceptable Levels of Service during the peak hours (see Table 7): Etiwanda Avenue(NS)at: 4th Street(EW)-#11 Etiwanda Avenue(NS)at: Napa Street(EW)-#1 Ontario Mills Parkway/Valley Boulevard (EW)-#3 • For Year 2035 Without Project traffic conditions, the study area intersections are projected to operate within acceptable Levels of Service during the peak hours, with improvements. Year 2035 Without Project delay worksheets are provided in Appendix E. YEAR 2035 WITH PROJECT—PHASES I&11 CONDITIONS For Year 2035 With Project—Phases I&II traffic conditions,the study area intersections are projected to operate within acceptable Levels of Service during the peak hours, except for the following study area intersections that are projected to operate at unacceptable Levels of Service during the peak hours(see Table 8): Etiwanda Avenue(NS)at: 4th Street(EW)-#11 Etiwanda Avenue(NS)at: Napa Street(EW)-#1 Ontario Mills Parkway/Valley Boulevard(EW)-#3 For Year 2035 With Project—Phases I&II traffic conditions,the study area intersections are projected to operate within acceptable Levels of Service during the peak hours, with improvements. Year 2035 With Project—Phases I&II delay worksheets are provided in Appendix E. • WWW.TRAFFIC-ENGINEER.COM 4 D,E,F,G-231 Mr.Ward Mace GOODMAN BIRTCHER • November 4,2013 RECOMMENDATIONS Improvements that will eliminate all anticipated roadway operational deficiencies throughout the study area have been identified (see Table 9). Etiwanda Avenue(NS)at: 4th Street(EW)-#11 - Construct an additional northbound through travel lane (General Plan improvement) - Construct an additional southbound through travel lane (General Plan improvement) Etiwanda Avenue(NS)at: Napa Street(EW)-#1 - Construct an additional northbound through travel lane(Requires spot widening) - Construct an additional southbound through travel lane(Requires spot widening) Ontario Mills Parkway/Valley Boulevard(EW)-#3 - Restripe an additional southbound left turn lane(Currently constructed but needs to be restriped) The project fair share percentages have been calculated for the improvement locations. The project share is based on the proportion of project peak hour traffic contributed to the improvement location • relative to the total new peak hour traffic volumes. Year 2035 With Project — Phases I & II fair share calculations are provided within Table 10. As mitigation for the potential traffic impacts, the proposed project shall contribute on a fair share basis. It has been a pleasure to service your needs on this project. Should you have any questions or if we can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to call at(714)973-8383. Sincerely, KUNZMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. ESKUNZMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. S/pQA � 0 y p?t A. KV,�ry FyR Carl Ballard, LEED GA 3 No.TR00� Z r" William Kunzman, P.E. Principal Associate - Principal * TRA FF #5276a OF WVW.TRAFFIC-ENGINEER.COM • 5 D,E,F,G-232 RESOLUTION NO. 13-46 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19448, A REVIEW OF A TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP IN CONJUNCTION WITH A PROPOSAL TO CONSTRUCT TWO (2) INDUSTRIAL WAREHOUSE BUILDINGS OF 555,664 SQUARE FEET (BUILDING 1/PHASE 1) AND 1,033,565 SQUARE FEET (BUILDING 2/PHASE 2) ON A PROPERTY COMPRISED OF THREE (3) PARCELS WITH A COMBINED AREA OF 3,255,834 SQUARE FEET (74.7 ACRES) WHICH IS CURRENTLY DEVELOPED WITH A CONCRETE PIPE MANUFACTURING/STORAGE FACILITY (OPERATED BY AMERON INTERNATIONAL)IN THE HEAVY INDUSTRIAL(HI)DISTRICT LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ARROW ROUTE AND ETIWANDA AVENUE;AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF—APN: 0229- 131-04, -17, AND -25. A. Recitals. 1. MIG/Hogle-Ireland,on behalf of Goodman Rancho SPE, LLC,filed an application forthe approval of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19448 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Parcel Map request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 13th day of November 2013 the Planning Commission of the City of • Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on November 13, 2013, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a property located at the southwest comer of Etiwanda Avenue and Arrow Route; b. The property is comprised of five (5) parcels with a combined area of 3,255,834 square feet (74.7 acres) and street frontage along Arrow Route of about 2,600 feet and street frontage along Etiwanda Avenue of about 1,700 feet; • C. The property is a concrete pipe manufacturing/storage facility operated byAmeron International, Inc. There are several buildings (of various size and purpose), outdoor equipment, areas for parking and storage, and associated infrastructure on the site. Most of the existing D,E,F,G-233 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-46 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19448— MIG/HOGLE-IRELAND FOR GOODMAN RANCHO SPE, LLC November 13, 2013 • Page 2 buildings are located at the north side of the site near Arrow Route. The southeastern part of the side is primarily used for the storage of finished concrete pipes. Paving on the site is generally limited to the parking areas and the associated access driveways; d. To the west and south are manufacturing facilities operated by Tree Island Wire, Inc. and Gerdau, respectively. To the north are a chemical manufacturing facility operated by Air Liquide and a water storage facility operated by the Metropolitan Water District(MWD). To the east are several small commercial (e.g. ARCO and Tole-House Caf6) and industrial businesses. The Victoria Woods apartment complex is located northeast of the site at the northeast comer of Etiwanda Avenue and Arrow Route. e. The subject property and the properties to the west and south are zoned Heavy Industrial GI Industrial (HI) District while the properties to the east and north are zoned General ndus ( ) District. The property at the northeast comer of Etiwanda Avenue and Arrow Route is zoned Medium (M) Residential, Etiwanda Specific Plan(South Overlay); f. The applicant proposes to consolidate the five(5)parcels that comprise the project site into two(2)parcels of 1,187,270 square feet(27.3 acres, Building 1)and 2,068,564 square feet (47.5 acres, Building 2)that will correspond with each proposed building; g. Each parcel will comply with the required minimum parcel size of 5 acres for projects in this development district; h. Both parcels will be contiguous and will be fully developed with buildings and • associated improvements; i. This application is in conjunction with Development Review DRC2013-00155,Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00315, and Uniform Sign Program DRC2013-00316. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed tentative parcel map is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The proposed tentative parcel map is in conjunction with a proposal to construct, in two(2)phases, two(2)industrial warehouse buildings of 555,664 square feet(Building 1/Phase 1)and 1,033,565 square feet (Building 2/Phase 2) with a combined floor area of 1,589,229 square feet. The underlying General Plan designation is Heavy Industrial. b. The proposed tentative parcel map,together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The project site is currently developed with a concrete pipe manufacturing/storage facility operated byAmeron International, Inc. There are several buildings(of various size and purpose), outdoor equipment, areas for parking and storage, and associated infrastructure on the site. Most of the existing buildings are located at the north side of the site near Arrow Route. The southeastern part of the side is primarily used for the storage of finished concrete pipes. Paving on the site is generally limited to the parking areas and the associated access • driveways—these improvements will be removed to allow the construction of the proposed project; the potential land uses are consistent with the land uses within the vicinity where it is located and the D.E.F.G-234 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-46 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19448— MIG/HOGLE-IRELAND FOR GOODMAN RANCHO SPE, LLC November 13, 2013 • Page 3 expectations of the community. The subject property and the properties to the west and south are zoned Heavy Industrial (HI) District while the properties to the east and north are zoned General Industrial(GI)District. The property at the northeast corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Arrow Route is zoned Medium (M) Residential, Etiwanda Specific Plan (South Overlay); C. The proposed tentative parcel map complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. The proposed tentative parcel map meets all standards outlined in the Development Code and the design and development standards and policies of the Planning Commission and the City including minimum parcel area, dimensions, and access. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration,together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application,the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA")and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that,with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative • Declaration was prepared. Thereafter,the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole recons before it,finds: (i)that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii)that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Manager of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909)477-2750. • 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached standard conditions incorporated herein by this reference. D,E,F,G-235 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-46 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19448— MIG/HOGLE-IRELAND FOR GOODMAN RANCHO SPE, LLC November 13, 2013 • Page 4 Planning Department 1) Approval is for the construction of two(2)industrial warehouse buildings of 555,664 square feet (Building 1/Phase 1) and 1,033,565 square feet (Building 2/Phase 2) on a property comprised of three (3) parcels with a combined area of 3,255,834 square feet (74.7 acres) which is currently developed with a concrete pipe manufacturing/storage facility(operated by Ameron International) in the Heavy Industrial (HI) District located at the southwest comer of Arrow Route and Etiwanda Avenue;APN: 0229-131- 04, -17, and -25. 2) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code,State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances. 3) Easements for the purpose of shared access,use,and maintenance of the parking lot areas, driveways, and drive aisles shall be provided. Documents for these easements shall be submitted for review by the City and the easement recorded with the County of San Bernardino(and other agencies/entities as may be required)prior to the issuance of grading and building permits. 4) All Conditions of Approval for Development Review DRC2013-00155,Tree • Removal Permit DRC2013-00315, and Uniform Sign Program DRC2013- 00316 shall apply. 5) If vegetation removal, soil disturbance, or any other construction related activity is to occur during the avian nesting season (February 1 through August 31), a preconstruction nesting survey shall be conducted prior to initiation of construction. If nests are discovered, they should be avoided through establishment of an appropriate buffer setback,as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist and consistent with CDFW protocols. The temporary "no construction" area would have to be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and left the nest,then construction in the area could resume. If initial ground disturbing activities or site clearing is proposed to occur outside of the nesting season (September 1 through January 31), then a preconstruction survey would not be required and construction could commence unimpeded. Engineering Department 1) Arrow Route frontage improvements shall be in accordance with City "Major Arterial" standards including but not limited to, curb and gutter, asphalt pavement, ADA access ramps, 9500 Lumen HPSV streetlights, commercial drive approaches, curvilinear sidewalk and street trees to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. • D.E.F.G-236 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-46 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19448— MIG/HOGLE-IRELAND FOR GOODMAN RANCHO SPE, LLC • November 13, 2013 Page 5 a. Shared driveway on the west property line shall align with a future "Local Industrial"cul-de-sac on the north side of Arrow Route. Drive approach shall be street-type with ADA access ramps with curb returns to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. b. Remove existing drive approach and replace with curb, gutter and sidewalk. On site fencing and gate for the existing driveway location should also be removed. c. Modify on-site drive aisles as required to utilize the new driveway. d. Additional driveways on Arrow Route shall be per Standard Drawing 101, Type C, with a minimum width of 35 feet, a maximum width of 50 feet and curb returns to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. e. The most easterly proposed driveway on Arrow Route shall be right tum only. f. Widen south side of Arrow Route to allow for dual left tum lanes and a right tum lane at the Etiwanda Avenue intersection. Widening at the intersection shall be 48 feet from existing centerline to curb at the BCR, with an additional 7 feet of right-of-way for curb adjacent sidewalk along the right tum lane. Maintain a 480-foot right tum lane and transition back to a standard half street section, of 36 feet in a 50-foot right-of-way, approximately 600 feet west of the Etiwanda • Avenue centerline. g. Modify existing traffic signal and equipment to allow for dual left tum lanes and an eastbound overlapping right tum at the Etiwanda Avenue intersection. h. Protect existing streetlights. Provide additional 9500 Lumen HPSV streetlights, as required. i. Protect existing curb and gutter, repair or relocate as required. j. Protect existing R26(S), "No Stopping" signs. k. Provide traffic signing and striping as required, including 100 feet of double yellow line on site on the centerline of the new shared driveway and any other required on-site striping. 2) Provide an easement on the final map,following the new shared driveway alignment along the west property line for all adjacent properties currently using the common drive aisle to access the relocated drive approach. a. Show existing Traffic Signal easement on the final map. Modify as needed to accommodate actual signal design. 3) Install a traffic signal at the intersection of the private drive and the future Yellow Wood Court on Arrow Route. Interim signal design shall accommodate an existing offset driveway on the north side of Arrow until the property at the northwest corner of the future street develops. • 4) Provide private drainage easements between the parcels on the map. D,E,F,G-237 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-46 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19448— MIG/HOGLE-IRELAND FOR GOODMAN RANCHO SPE, LLC November 13, 2013 Page 6 • 5) Etiwanda Avenue frontage improvements shall be in accordance with City "Major Arterial" standards including but not limited to, curb and gutter, asphalt pavement, ADA access ramps, 9500 Lumen HPSV streetlights, commercial drive approaches,sidewalk and street trees to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. a. Widen west side of Etiwanda Avenue to allow for dual left tum lanes at the Arrow Route intersection. Widening at the intersection shall be 38 feet from existing centerline to curb at the ECR,with an additional 12 feet for right-of-way. Maintain approximately 350 feet for northbound left tum median deceleration plus storage and transition back to a standard half street section, of 36 feet in a 50-foot right-of- way, approximately 550 feet south of the Arrow Route centerline. b. Modify traffic signal and equipment to allow for dual left tum lanes and a northbound overlapping right tum at the Arrow Route intersection. c. Transition to existing curb and gutter south of the south project boundary to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. The developer shall receive credit against, and reimbursement of costs in excess of,the Transportation Development Fee for widening necessary to achieve a southbound number two lane(asphalt only). The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover • costs in excess of impact fees. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public improvements being accepted by the City,all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. e. Provide 9500 lumen HPSV streetlights, as required. f. Provide traffic striping and signage, as required. g. Protect existing R26(S), "No Stopping" signs. h. Provide a curbside drain outlet for BMP basin overflow channel. 6) Provide a Bus Bay—Right Tum Lane, per Standard Drawing 119, for the northerly driveway on Etiwanda Avenue, in addition to the intersection widening. Right-of-way along the right tum lane shall provide at least 7 feet for curb adjacent sidewalk. 7) Modify the Traffic Signal at the Etiwanda/Arrow Route intersection to accommodate the widening and additional turning lanes on both streets including upgrading to full protected left turns. a. Install interim striping to match up with existing single left tum lanes on opposing legs of this intersection. Also provide an ultimate striping plan for dual left turn lanes on all four legs. 8) Install a traffic signal at the intersection of Etiwanda and Whittram • Avenues. D,E,F.G-238 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-46 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19448— MIG/HOGLE-IRELAND FOR GOODMAN RANCHO SPE, LLC November 13, 2013 • Page 7 b. Project drive approach on west side shall be street-type with ADA access ramps and curb returns to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. C. Whittram Avenue interim street improvements on east side shall be to City "Industrial Collector" standards. South curb line shall align with south edge of project driveway. d. Curb return at southeast comer of the intersection shall be installed at its ultimate location. Interim 44-foot width of Whittram Avenue will result in a centerline offset 10 feet south of ultimate. Provide pavement transition and lane striping to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. A power pole may need to be relocated. e. Provide ADA access ramps on all four comers, including the interim curb return on the northeast comer. f. The developer shall receive credit against, and reimbursement of costs in excess of, the Transportation Development Fee for permanent improvements installed in their ultimate locations, in conformance with City policy. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. • 9) Provide a construction easement in favor of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and an access easement to the drive approach that aligns with Whittram Avenue, in favor of properties to the south and southeast (APN 0229-131-07,-15,-16,-26&-27 and 0229-162-14&-15),the City for maintenance purposes and all applicable utilities. These easements will only be utilized when the City reconstructs the Etiwanda/Whittram intersection to accommodate an overpass of the Metrolink right-of-way. 10) Parkways shall slope at 2 percent from the top of curb to one foot behind the sidewalk along all street frontages. 11) Metropolitan Water District(MWD)shall approve all plans that impact their easement, including utilities, storm drains, slopes, street trees, and landscaping. A note shall be included on all pertinent plans requiring Metropolitan Water District Operations Maintenance Branch to be notified two working days prior to starting any work in the vicinity of their easement. 12) A permit shall be obtained from Metropolitan Water District for any work within their right-of-way, including grading. 13) Install Area 10 Master Plan Storm Drain facilities in Etiwanda Avenue,from 6th Street to Arrow Route, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Standard drainage fees for the site shall be credited to the cost of permanent master plan facilities, in accordance with City policy. The • developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover over sizing costs, in excess of fees,from future development within the same tributary area. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement D.E.F.G-239 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-46 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19448— MIG/HOGLE-IRELAND FOR GOODMAN RANCHO SPE, LLC November 13, 2013 • Page 8 within 6 months of the public improvements being accepted by the City,all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. a. Replace City Drawing No. 1661 with Drawing No.2335-D currently in plan check. b. Drainage fees have already been collected for 11 acres(developed portion of APN 229-131-25) so the developer's fee requirement (credit)will be reduced accordingly. 14) General City Master Plan drainage fees shall be paid for the portion of APN 229-131-17 that falls within that drainage area. 15) The existing overhead utilities(telecommunications and electrical, except for 66 kV electrical) on the project side of Arrow Route shall be undergrounded from the first pole on the east side of Etiwanda Avenue to the first pole off site west of the west project boundary, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. All services crossing Arrow Route shall be undergrounded at the same time. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one- half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future redevelopment as it occurs on the opposite side of the street. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public • improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. a. 66 kV poles may need to be relocated for the intersection widening. 16) An in-lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical, except for 66 kV electrical) on the opposite side of Etiwanda Avenue shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of building permits. The fee shall be one half the City adopted unit amount times the length from the center of Arrow Route to the south project boundary. a. In-lieu fees have already been collected for the 658-foot frontage of APN 229-131-25. b. All services crossing Etiwanda Avenue shall be removed or placed underground. 17) Public improvement plans shall be 90 percent complete prior to the issuance of grading permits. Public improvement plans shall be 100 percent complete, signed by the City Engineer, and an improvement agreement and bonds executed by the developer, prior to building permit issuance. 16) If developer decides to phase installation of the public improvements, the following improvement certificate shall be included on the parcel map: • D.F.F.G-240 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-46 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19448— MIG/HOGLE-IRELAND FOR GOODMAN RANCHO SPE, LLC • November 13, 2013 Page 9 a. Complete the master plan storm drain in Etiwanda Avenue with the first development phase. b. Complete full intersection improvements at Arrow Route and Etiwanda Avenue with the first development phase. This will include the traffic signal modification, relocation of existing catch basins and transitions back to existing pavement widths to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. C. All frontage improvements on Arrow Route shall be completed with development of Parcel 1, including the traffic signal for the shared project driveway at the west property line. d. All frontage improvements on Etiwanda Avenue shall be completed with development of Parcel 2, including the traffic signal at W hittram Avenue and related improvements on the east side of Etiwanda Avenue. 19) Prior to issuance of construction permits, the applicant shall coordinate with the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the City of Ontario the fees and method of payment for constructing the street improvements identified in the Supplemental Traffic Analysis prepared by Kunzman Associates, Inc. on November 4, 2013 to ensure that the street intersections of Etiwanda Avenue and 4th Street,and Etiwanda Avenue and Napa Street,operate at • levels of service(LOS)consistent with the General Plans of both the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the City of Ontario. Building and Safety Department—Grading Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit 1) Prior to the issuance of a grading permit a non-category Water Quality Management Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official. 2) Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a drainage easement or letter from the downstream property owners accepting concentrated drainage flows. 3) Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 4) Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number(WDID). 5) A Grading Bond will be required to be submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department Official for review and approval prior to issuance of a • Grading Permit. D,E,F,G-241 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-46 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19448— MIG/HOGLE-IRELAND FOR GOODMAN RANCHO SPE, LLC November 13, 2013 • Page 10 6) All roof drainage flowing to the public right of way(Etiwanda Avenue)must drain under the sidewalk through a parkway culvert approved by the Engineering Services Department. 7) The applicant shall provide a copy of EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells)with the Facility ID Number assigned to the Building and Safety Services Department Official prior to issuance of the Grading Permit. Prior to issuance of a Wall Permit 1) On engineered combination garden/retaining walls along the property boundary the structural calculations for the wall shall assume a level toe/heel at the adjacent off-site property(i.e. a manufactured slope is not present). 2) A copy of the Grading Special Conditions of Approval shall be included within the engineered wall plans and calculations. Environmental Mitigation Air Quality • 1) Prior to issuance of building permits,the project proponent shall submit,to the satisfaction of the Planning Department, a Coating Restriction Plan (CRP), consistent with South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD)guidelines and a letter agreeing to include in any construction contracts and/or subcontracts a requirement that the contractors adhere to the CRP. The CRP measures shall be implemented to the satisfaction of City Building Director. These may include the following: • That volatile organic compounds (VOC) of proposed architectural coatings not exceed 25 for interior applications. • That volatile organic compounds (VOC) of proposed architectural coatings not exceed 75 gill for exterior applications. This measure shall conform to the performance standard that emissions of volatile organic compounds from application of interior or exterior coatings shall not exceed the daily emissions thresholds established by the South Coast Air Quality Management District.The CRP shall specify use of High- Volume, Low Pressure (HVLP)spray guns for application of coatings. 2) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at • the construction site for City verification. D,E,F,G-242 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-46 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19448— MIG/HOGLE-IRELAND FOR GOODMAN RANCHO SPE, LLC November 13, 2013 • Page 11 3) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit Construction Plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated .and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff. 4) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 5) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 6) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 7) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent(approved • by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board[RWQCB])daily to reduce Particulate Matter(PM10)emissions,in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. D.E.F.G-243 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-46 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19448— MIG/HOGLE-IRELAND FOR GOODMAN RANCHO SPE, LLC November 13, 2013 • Page 12 8) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. 9) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel- powered equipment where feasible. 10) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. Long Tenn Emissions 11) Prior to issuance of occupancy permits or business licenses,future tenants of the proposed project shall submit a report to the Planning Department identifying all diesel engine powered trucks within the occupant's fleet and verification that vehicles have been equipped with a filter that reduces oxides of nitrogen by a minimum of 25 percent below typical operating conditions as verified by the California Air Resources Board through executive order, or that vehicles have been equipped with control technologies or powered by engines that emit oxides of nitrogen at levels that will not otherwise cause the South Coast Air Quality Management District(SCAQMD)daily threshold for oxides of nitrogen. This report shall • be updated upon occupancy by a new tenant. 12) Provide preferential parking to high occupancy vehicles and shuttle services. 13) Improve thermal integrity of the buildings and reduce thermal load with automated time clocks or occupant sensors. 14) Landscape with native and/or drought-resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 15) Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planting programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC-01 measure. 16) All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods(i.e., in excess of 10 minutes). 17) All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools. 18) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas. • D.E.F.G-244 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-46 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19448— MIG/HOGLE-IRELAND FOR GOODMAN RANCHO SPE, LLC • November 13, 2013 Page 13 19) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible. Biological Resources 1) The trees that are removed shall be replaced with new trees, on a one-to- one basis, of a minimum 15-gallon size. Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading,the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities,to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special • qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. • Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with Section 21083.2 Archeological resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important,and unique prehistoric resources, including but not limited to, avoiding archeological sites, capping or covering site with soil, planning the site as a park or green space or paying an in-kind mitigation fee. • Prepare a technical resources management report,documenting the inventory,evaluation,and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report, with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 2) If any paleontological resource(i.e.plant or animal fossils)are encountered before or during grading,the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities,to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate,the program must • include, but not be limited to, the following measures: D.F.F_G-245 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-46 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19448— MIG/HOGLE-IRELAND FOR GOODMAN RANCHO SPE, LLC November 13, 2013 • Page 14 • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared orgraded,divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository(i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy to the report to San Bernardino County Museum. Geology and Soils 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent(approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB)daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping • as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM10 emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Short Term (Construction) GHG Emissions 1) The project must comply with all rules that assist in reducing short-term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAWMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil-stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 2) The construction contractor shall select construction equipment based on • low-emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on D.E.F.G-246 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-46 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19448— MIG/HOGLE-IRELAND FOR GOODMAN RANCHO SPE, LLC • November 13, 2013 Page 15 the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures' specification. 3) Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 minutes. 4) Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline-or diesel-powered engines where feasible. 5) Construction should be timed so as not to interfere with peak-hour traffic. 6) Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be supported and encouraged for construction crew. Long Term (Operational) GHG Emission 7) Construction and Building materials shall - be produced and/or manufactured locally. Use "Green Building Materials" such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled, and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low-volatile-organic-compound (VOC) materials. • 8) Design all buildings to exceed California Building Code Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of: • Increased insulation • Limit air leakage through the structure • Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances • Landscape and developed site utilizing shade, prevailing winds and landscaping • Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems • Install light colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements • Install solar or light emitting diodes(LED's)for outdoor lighting. 9) Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and include the following: • Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. is • Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available and/or install the infrastructure to deliver and use reclaimed water. D.E.F.G-247 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-46 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19448—MIG/HOGLE-IRELAND FOR GOODMAN RANCHO SPE, LLC November 13, 2013 • Page 16 • Design building to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets, dual flush toilets and waterless urinals/water heaters. • Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non- vegetated surfaces. 10) Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educated employees about reducing waste and about recycling. Hydrology and Water Quality Construction Activities 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Building Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP)specifically identifying Best Management Practices(BMPs)that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the stone drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared,included in the Grading Plan,and implemented for the proposed project that identifies speck measures to • control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b)An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction,to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by Fuscoe Engineering, Inc. on July 3, 2013) to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 6) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be • monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring D.E.F.G-248 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-46 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19448—MIG/HOGLE-IRELAND FOR GOODMAN RANCHO SPE, LLC • November 13, 2013 Page 17 provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. Grading Activities 7) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 8) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits,the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent(NOI)to comply with obtaining coverage underthe National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number)shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Noise • 1) Prior to the issuance of any grading plans a construction-related noise mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. The Plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction. 2) Business operations shall maintain a noise level at 60dB or less during the hours of 10 PM until 7 AM. No loading and unloading activities including opening, closing, or other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials, garbage cans, or other similar objects between the hours of 10 PM and 7 AM in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to residential areas. 3) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 4) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050, as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards,then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. • If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. D,E,F,G-249 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-46 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19448— MIG/HOGLE-IRELAND FOR GOODMAN RANCHO SPE, LLC November 13, 2013 • Page 18 5) The perimeter screen wall shall be constructed as early as possible in the first phase. 6) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF OCTOBER 2013. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Frances Howdyshell, Chairman • ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced,passed,and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of November 2013, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: • D.E.F.G-250 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT#: SUBTPM19448 SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP APPLICANT: MIG/HOGLE-IRELAND FOR GOODMAN RANCHO SPE, LLC LOCATION: SWC ETIWANDA AVENUE AND ARROW ROUTE; APN: 0229-131-04, 17, 25 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General Requirements Completion Date 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorneys fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 13-46, Standard _/_/_ Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 3. The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below. The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Manager hearing. a) Mitigated Negative Declaration -$2,206.25 • 1 D.E.F.G-251 Project No. SUBTPM19448 Completion Date B. Time Limits • 1. This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the Engineering Services Department within 3 years from the date of the approval. C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager. 3. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 4. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. D. Environmental 1. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of _/ /_ • implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Manager in the amount of $ 581 prior to the issuance of Building Permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY SERVICES DEPARTMENT, (909)477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S). E. Building and Safety Industrial and Commercial Standard Conditions —/—/- 1. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan; C. Floor Plan; d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan; e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; • f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and 2 D.E.F.G-252 Project No. SUBTPM19448 Completion Date g. Planning Department Project Number(i.e., SUBTT, SUBTPM, MDR, CUP, DRC, etc.) • clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, two sets of energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance. 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. 5. Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the Building and Safety Services Department. 6. Developers wishing to participate in the Community Energy Efficiency Program (CEEP) can contact the Building and Safety Services Department staff for information and submittal requirements. Site Development 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be marked with the project file number (i.e., SUBTPM19448). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Services Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. • 2. Prior to issuance of Building Permits for a new commercial or industrial development project or major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees. The applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Services Department prior to permits issuance. 3. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tract/parcel map _/ recordation and prior to issuance of Building Permits. 4. For projects using septic tank facilities, shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Official _/_/_ for review and approval prior to the issuance of Septic Tank Permits, and prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 5. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. 6. Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Department public counter). 7. All commercial/public/multi-family development swimming pool plans shall be submitted to the County of San Bernardino's Environmental Health Services Department for review and approval prior to approval from the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 8. The following is required for side yard use for increase in allowable area: • a. Provide a reduced Site Plan (8 1/2-inches by 11 inches), which indicates the non- buildable easement. 3 D.E,F,G-253 Project No. SUBTPM19448 Completion Date b. Recorded "Covenant and Agreement for the Maintenance of a Non-Buildable • Easement,"which is signed by the appropriate property owner(s). New Structures 1. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness. 2. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. --- 3. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's"high wind" instructions. 4. Plans for food preparation areas shall be approved by County of San Bernardino Environmental Health Services prior to issuance of Building Permits. 5. Provide draft stops in attic areas in accordance with CBC Section 1505. 6. Roofing materials shall be Class"A." 7. Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with CBC . 8. Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC. 9. Walls and floors separating dwelling units in the same building shall be in accordance with the CBC. 10. Provide smoke and heat venting in accordance with CBC. /_/_ • 11. Upon plan check submittal, additional requirements may be needed. F. Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The grading and drainage plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual grading and drainage plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 3. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or engineering geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 4. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 5. A separate Grading and Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer. 6. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and /_/_ • place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit. 4 D.E.F.G-254 Project No. SUBTPM19448 Completion Date • 7. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, that plan shall be a separate plan/permit from the Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 8. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a Grading Permit. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. 9. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit. 10. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to obtain written permission from the adjacent property owners to construct walls on property tines or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s)to be constructed off-set from the property line. 11. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on-site construction where possible, and provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 12. All slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot off-set from the public right-of-way or adjacent private property. 13. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the latest adopted California Plumbing Code. 14. The maximum parking stall gradient is 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the current adopted California Building Code. • 15. The final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100 feet beyond the project boundary. 16. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a Grading Permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 17. The precise Grading and Drainage Plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout"Information for Grading Plans and Permit." • 5 D.E.F.G-255 Project No. SUBTPM19448 Completion Date 18. Grading Inspections: —/—/_ • a. Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the Grading Permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b. The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Services Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i. The bottom of the over-excavation; ii. Completion of rough grading - The grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Services Department front counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv. The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. 19. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy the engineer of record shall certify the _/_/_ functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) best management practices(BMP)devices. 20. Roof storm water is not permitted to flow over the public parkway and shall be directed to an _I_/_ • under parkway culvert per City of Rancho Cucamonga requirements prior to issuance of a Grading Permit. G. Water Quality Management Plan 1. A Storm Water Quality Management Plan shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit 2. The Water Quality Management Plan shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. THE APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: H. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline): 50-55 total feet on Arrow Route 50 total feet on Etiwanda Avenue 2. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. • 6 D.E.F.G-256 Project No. SUBTPM19448 Completion Date • 3. Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or prior to the issuance of Building Permits, where no map is involved. 4. Reciprocal parking agreements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all common roads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by CC &R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to, or concurrent with, the final parcel map. 5. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or noted on the final map. 6. All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be quit-claimed or delineated on the final map. 7. Easements for public sidewalks placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City. 8. Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum of 7 feet measured from the face of curbs. I. Street Improvements 1. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may • have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. 2. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Curb ti A.C. Side- Drive Street Street Comm Median Bike Street Name Gutter Pvmt walk Appr. Lights Trees Trail Island Trail J(e Arrow Route X X (c) X X Etiwanda Avenue X X X X X X Whittram Avenue X X Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item. (e) ADA Access Ramps. 3. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street • improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, .. whichever occurs first. 7 r).F.F.C;-257 Project No. SUBTPM19448 Completion Date b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a —/—/— • construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. C. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, �— and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or —/—/— reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: —/—/- 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 8 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specked. e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with �— adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A provided to cover the cost of radio and paving, which shall be cash deposit shall be p grading P 9 refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall —/—/— • be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to submittal for first �— plan check. 4. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with with the Citys street tree program. 5. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The /—/— completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet—(typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. e Min. Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing Size Uty. Arrow Route Gingko biloba Maidenhair Tree 5' 20' 15 "Fairmount" O.C. Gal Eitwanda Avenue Geijera parviflora Australian Willow 5' 25' 15 O.C. Gal Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may • require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. 8 D.F.F.G-258 Project No. SUBTPM19448 Completion Date 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. • 6. Add the following note to any private landscape plans that show street trees: "All —/—/— improvements within the public right-of-way, including street trees, shall be installed per the public improvement plans' If there is a discrepancy between the public and private plans, the street improvement plans will govern. 7. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. J. Public Maintenance Areas 1. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and —/—/— Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. K. Drainage and Flood Control 1. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final —/—/— map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. 2. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage �— entering the property from adjacent areas. • 3. Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe �— measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk. L. Improvement Completion 1. If the required public improvements are not completed prior to approval of the final parcel —/—/— map, an improvement security accompanied by an agreement executed by the Developer and the City will be required for: ALL PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS M. Utilities 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, —/—/— gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV(all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. —/—/- 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District(CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. • 4. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. —/—/— Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. 9 D.E.F.G-259 Project No. SUBTPM19448 Completion Date 5. Developer shall execute a Line Extension Agreement for electric service and shall construct —/�— • electrical distribution facilities in accordance with such agreement and shall construct electrical distribution facilities in accordance with such agreement and Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility requirements and dedicate such facilities to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility. The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility shall be the electrical service provider for all project related development. N. General Requirements and Approvals 1. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs —/—/— for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to Building Permit issuance if no map is involved. 2. Prior to the issuance of Building Permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative �— fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable If at least 50 percent of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department when the first Building Permit application is submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: The project must Comply in design and constructed in accordance with the 2010 California Building and Fire Codes, the RCFPD Ordinance FD50 and the RCFPD Standards. The RCFPD ordinance, procedures&standards which are referenced in this document can be access on the • web at www.citvofrc.us. O. INDUSTRIAL FIRE STANDARD CONDITIONS FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply Design Guidelines for Fire Hydrants: Reference the RCFPD Standard 5-10. FSC-2 Fire Flow 1. The required fire flow for this project is calculated gallons per minute at a minimum residual �— pressure of 20 pounds per square inch. This requirement is made in accordance with California Fire Code Appendix, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances. The required minimum fire flow for this project may be reduced by 50 percent when automatic fire sprinklers are installed. 2. Public fire hydrants located within the immediate vicinity of the proposed project may be used to provide the required fire flow subject to Fire District review and approval. Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow. 3. Fire protection water supply plans are required for all projects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site. Building Permits will not be issued until the fire protection water supply plans are approved. 4. On all Site Plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600 feet of —/— the proposed project site. FSC-3 Pre-requisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems • Prior to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire sprinkler system, the applicant shall —/—/— submit plans, specifications and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground supply 10 D.E.F.G-260 Project No. SUBTPM19448 Completion Date piping. Approval of the underground supply piping system must be obtained prior to submitting • the overhead fire sprinkler system plans. FSC-4 Requirements for Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Automatic fire sprinklers shall be installed in buildings as required by the current editions of the —/—/— California Fire Code, the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance and/or any other applicable standards that require an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed. FSC-5 Fire Alarm System &Sprinkler Monitoring 1. The current edition of California Building/Fire Codes, the RCFPD Ordinance and Fire Alarm —/—/— Standard 9-3 require most fire sprinkler systems to be monitored by a Central Station sprinkler monitoring system. A manual and or automatic fire alarm system may also be required based on the use and occupancy of the building. Plan check approval and a Building Permit are required prior to the installation of a fire alarm or a sprinkler monitoring system. Plans and specifications shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services in accordance with RCFPD Fire Alarm Standards. Refer to the specified documents for the system requirements. FSC-6 Fire District Site Access: Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private roads, drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes. Please reference the RCFPD Fire Department Access Roadways Standard 5-1. 1. Location of Access: All portions of the structures 1 st story exterior wall shall be located �— within 150-feet of Fire District vehicle access, measured on an approved route around the exterior of the building. Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates and • fences are deemed obstructions. 2. Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are: �— a. The minimum unobstructed width is 26 feet. b. The maximum inside turn radius shall be 24 feet. C. The minimum outside turn radius shall be 50 feet. d. The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 45 feet. e. The minimum vertical clearance is 14 feet, 6 inches. f. At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20 feet on each side. g. The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9 degrees or 20 percent. h. The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12 percent. I. Support a minimum load of 80,000 pounds gross vehicle weight(GVW). j. Trees and shrubs planted adjacent to the fire lane shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14 feet, 6 inches from the ground up. Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus. 3. Access Doorways: -Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be —/—/— provided as follows: a. In buildings without high-piled storage, access shall be provided in accordance with the current edition of California Building/Fire Codes and/or any other applicable • standards. b. In buildings with high-piled storage access doors shall be provided in each 100 lineal feet or major fraction thereof, of the exterior-wall that faces the required access 11 D.E.F.G-261 Project No. SUBTPM19448 Completion Date roadways. When railways are installed provisions shall be made to maintain Fire • District access to all required openings. 4. Access Walkways: Hardscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus �— access road to all required building exterior openings. 5. Building Access: Knox boxes for site and building access are required in accordance with —/—/— RCFPD Standard 5-9. 6. Commercial/Industrial Gates: Any gate installed across a Fire Department access road —/—/— shall be in accordance with Fire District Standards. The following design requirements apply: a. Prior to the fabrication and installation of the gates, plans are required to be submitted to Fire Construction Services (FCS) for approval. Upon the completion of the installation and before placing the gates in service, inspection and final acceptance must be requested from FCS. b. Gates must slide open horizontally or swing inward. C. Gates may be motorized or manual. d. When fully open, the minimum clearance dimension of drive access shall be 20 feet. e. Manual gates must be equipped with a RCFPD lock. The lock must be purchased at the Fire Administration Office. f. Motorized gates must open at the rate of one-foot per second. g. The motorized gate actuation mechanism must be equipped with a manual override • device and a fail-safe or battery backup feature to open the gate or release the locking Mechanism in case of power failure or mechanical malfunction. h. Motorized gates shall be equipped with a Knox override key switch. The switch must be installed outside the gate in a visible and unobstructed location. I. For motorized gates, a traffic loop device must be installed to allow exiting from the complex. j. If traffic pre-emption devices (TPD) are to be installed, the device, location and operation must be approved by the Fire Chief prior to installation. Bi-directional or multiple sensors may be required due to complexity of the various entry configurations. 7. Fire Lane Identification: Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes. A Site Plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department for approval. 8. Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly —/—/— noted on the Site Plan. A copy of the approved Alternative Method application, if applicable, must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department for plan review. 9. Roof Access: must be in accordance with the RCFPD Roof Access Standard. There shall —/—/— be a means of fire department access from the exterior walls of the buildings on to the roofs of all commercial, industrial and multi-family residential structures more than 10,000 square • feet or with roof more than 15 feet in height and less than 75 feet above the level of the fire access road. a. This access must be reachable by the Fire Department aerial ladder. 12 D.E.F.G-262 Project No. SUBTPM19448 Completion Date • b. A minimum of one ladder point with a fixed ladder shall be provided in buildings with construction features, or high parapets that inhibit roof access. C. The number of ladder points may be required to be increased, depending on the building size and configuration. d. Regardless of the parapet height or construction features the approved ladder point shall be identified in accordance to the roof access standard. e. Where the entire roof access is restricted by high parapet walls or other obstructions, a permanently mounted access ladder is required. f. Multiple access ladders may be required for larger buildings. g. Ladder construction must be in accordance with the RCFPD Roof Access Standard Appendix. h. A Site Plan showing the locations of the roof ladder shall be submitted during plan check. i. Ladder points shall face a fire access roadway(s). FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits �— Listed are those Fire Code permits commonly associated with the business operations and/or building construction. Plan check submittal is required with the permit application for approval of the permit; field inspection is required prior to permit issuance. General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not specifically described below, which in the judgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property. • . Aerosol Products . Magnesium Working • Application of Flammable Finishes Motor Vehicle Fuel-Dispensing Operation . Automobile Wrecking Yards • Open Burning Battery Systems • Organic Coating • Candles and open flames in public assemblies • Ovens • Cellulose Nitrate • Powder Coating • Compressed Gases . Public Assembly • Cryogenics . Pyrotechnical Special Effects • Dry Cleaning Plants . Radioactive Materials e Dust-Producing Processes and Operations Refrigeration Systems • • Explosive or Blasting Agents • Repair Garages • Flammable and Combustible Liquids 13 D.F.F_G-2Fi3 Project No. SUBTPM19448 Completion Date • Rubbish Handling Operations • • Fruit Ripening Plants • Spraying or Dipping Operations • Hazardous Materials • Tents, Canopies and/or Air Supported Structures • High-Pile Combustible Storage(HPS) • Tire Storage • Liquefied Petroleum Gases • Welding and Cutting Operations • LPG or Gas Fuel Vehicles in Assembly Buildings • Wood Products/Lumber Yards FSC-11 Hazardous Materials-Submittal to the County of San Bernardino �— The San Bernardino County Fire Department shall review your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan for compliance with minimum standards. Contact the San Bernardino County Fire, Hazardous Materials Division at (909) 387-4631 for fors and assistance. The County Fire Department is the Cal/EPA Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. If the facility is a NEW business, a Certificate of Occupancy issued by the Building and �— Safety Services Department will not be finalized until the San Bernardino County Fire Department reviews your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan. California Government Code, Section 65850.2 prohibits the City from issuing a final Certificate of Occupancy unless the applicant has met or is meeting specific hazardous materials disclosure • requirements. A Risk Management Program (RMP) may also be required if regulation substances are to be used or stored at the new facility. 2. Any business that operates on rented or leased property which is required to submit a plan —/—/— is also required to submit a notice to the owner of the property in writing stating that the business is subject to the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan mandates and has complied with the provisions. The tenant must provide a copy of the Plan to the property owner within five(5)working days, if requested by the owner. FSC-12 Hazardous Materials-Submittal to Fire Construction Services �- 1. Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction of buildings and/or the installation of equipment designed to store, use or dispense hazardous materials in accordance with the current editions of the California Building, Fire, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical Codes, RCFPD Ordinances and other implemented and/or adopted standards. FSC-13 Alternate Method Application - Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal --- will review all requests for alternate method, when submitted. The request must be submitted on the Fire District "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the review fee. • 14 D.F_F.G-264 Project No. SUBTPM19448 Completion Date FCS-14 Map Recordation —/—/— • 1. Reciprocal Agreements for Fire Department Emergency Access and Water Supply are required on this project. The project appears to be located on a property that is being subdivided. The reciprocal agreement is required to be recorded between property owners and the Fire District. The recorded agreement shall include a copy of the Site Plan. The Fire Construction Services shall approve the agreement, prior to recordation. The agreement shall be recorded with the County of San Bernardino, Recorder's Office. 2. Reciprocal Access Agreement – Please provide a permanent access agreement between —/—/— the owners granting irrevocable and a non-exclusive easement, favoring the Fire District to gain access to the subject property. The agreement shall include a statement that no obstruction, gate, fence, building or other structure shall be placed within the dedicated access, without Fire Department approval. The agreement shall have provisions for emergency situations and the assessing of cost recovery to the property by the Fire District. 3. Reciprocal Water Covenant – Please provide a permanent maintenance and service �— covenant between the owners granting an irrevocable and non-exclusive easement, favoring the Fire District for the purpose of accessing and maintaining the private water mains, valves and fire hydrants (fire protection systems facilities in general). The covenant shall have provisions for emergency situations and the assessing of cost recovery to the property by the Fire District. FCS-15 Annexation of the Parcel Map: Annexation of the parcel map into the Community --- Facilities District#85-1 or#88-1 is required prior to the issuance of Grading or Building Permits. • Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS – Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any Building Permits: 1. Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District. Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District Standards. Approval of the on-site (private) fire underground and water plans is required prior to any Building Permit issuance for any structure on the site. Private on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards. The Building and Safety Services Department and Fire Construction Services. will perform plan checks and inspections. All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. Fire construction Services will inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 2. Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CVWD. On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the project. Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard. All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. CVWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing. Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CVWD. Fire Construction Services must grant a • clearance before lumber is dropped. 15 D.E.F.G-265 Project No. SUBTPM19448 Completion Date 3. Construction Access: The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard. All temporary utilities over access roads • must be installed at least 14 feet, 6 inches above the finished surface of the road. 4. Fire Flow: A current fire flow letter from CVWD must be received. The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CVWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services. 5. Easements and Reciprocal Agreements: All easements and agreements must be recorded with the County of San Bernardino. PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The building construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services' 'Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures." PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION-Please complete the following: 1. Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers". On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location. 2. Private Fire Hydrants: For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in —/—/— the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on-site fire hydrants. The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner • are responsible for hiring the company to perform the test. A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available. The fire flow available must meet or exceed the required fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code. 3. Fire Sprinkler System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler �— system(s)shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. 4. Fire Sprinkler Monitoring: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire �— sprinkler monitoring system must be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. The fire sprinkler monitoring system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system (subject to the release of power). 5. Fire Suppression Systems and/or other special hazard protection systems shall be —/—/— inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services before occupancy is granted and/or equipment is placed in service. 6. Fire Alarm System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm system shall be installed, inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. 7. Access Control Gates: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates �— must be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards by Fire Construction Services. • 16 D,E,F,G-266 Project No. SUBTPM19448 Completion Date • 8. Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire —/—/— access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services. The CCBR's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways. 9. Address: Must be in accordance with the RCFPD Standard 5-7, 5-8 and/or 5-5. Prior to the —/—/— issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commercial/industrial and multi-family buildings shall post the address in accordance to the appropriate RCFPD addressing Standard. 10. Hazardous Materials: The applicant must obtain inspection and acceptance by Fire —/—/— Construction Services. 11. Confidential Business Occupancy Information: The applicant shall complete the Rancho —/—/— Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form. This form provides contact information for Fire District use in the event of an emergency at the subject building or property. This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector. 12. Mapping Site Plan: Must be in accordance with the RCFPD Standard 5-11. Prior to the —/—/— issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a 8 '/2" x 11" or 11" x 17" Site Plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual • location of all devices and building features as required in the standard. The Site Plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector. • 17 D.E.F.G-267 RESOLUTION NO. 13-47 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00155,A REVIEW OFA PROPOSAL TO CONSTRUCT TWO (2) INDUSTRIAL WAREHOUSE BUILDINGS OF 555,664 SQUARE FEET(BUILDING 1/PHASE 1)AND 1,033,565 SQUARE FEET(BUILDING 2/PHASE 2) ON A PROPERTY COMPRISED OF THREE (3) PARCELS WITH A COMBINED AREA OF 3,255,834 SQUARE FEET (74.7 ACRES) WHICH IS CURRENTLY DEVELOPED WITH A CONCRETE PIPE MANUFACTURING/STORAGE FACILITY (OPERATED BY AMERON INTERNATIONAL)IN THE HEAVY INDUSTRIAL(HI)DISTRICT LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ARROW ROUTE AND ETIWANDA AVENUE;AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF—APN: 0229- 131-04, -17, AND -25. A. Recitals. 1. MIG/Hogle-Ireland,on behalf of Goodman Rancho SPE,LLC,filed an application for the approval of Development Review DRC2013-00155 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 13th day of November 2013 the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said • hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on November 13, 2013, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a property located at the southwest comer of Etiwanda Avenue and Arrow Route; b. The property is comprised of five (5) parcels with a combined area of 3,255,834 square feet (74.7 acres) and street frontage along Arrow Route of about 2,600 feet and street frontage along Etiwanda Avenue of about 1,700 feet; C. The property is a concrete pipe manufacturing/storage facility operated byAmeron International, Inc. There are several buildings (of various size and purpose), outdoor equipment, • areas for parking and storage, and associated infrastructure on the site. Most of the existing buildings are located at the north side of the site near Arrow Route. The southeastern part of the D,E,F,G-268 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-47 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00155— MIG/HOGLE-IRELAND FOR GOODMAN RANCHO SPE, LLC November 13, 2013 Page 2 is site is primarily used for the storage of finished concrete pipes. Paving on the site is generally limited to the parking areas and the associated access driveways; d. To the west and south are manufacturing facilities operated by Tree Island Wire, Inc. and Gerdau, respectively. To the north are a chemical manufacturing facility operated by Air Liquide and a water storage facility operated by the Metropolitan Water District(MWD). To the east are several small commercial (e.g. ARCO and Tole-House Caf6) and industrial businesses. The Victoria Woods apartment complex is located northeast of the site at the northeast comer of Etiwanda Avenue and Arrow Route. e. The subject property and the properties to the west and south are zoned Heavy Industrial (HI) District while the properties to the east and north are zoned General Industrial (GI) District. The property at the northeast comer of Etiwanda Avenue and Arrow Route is zoned Medium (M) Residential, Etiwanda Specific Plan (South Overlay); f. The applicant proposes to redevelop the site in two(2)phases by constructing two (2) industrial warehouse buildings of 555,664 square feet (Building 1/Phase 1) and 1,033,565 square feet(Building 2/Phase 2)with a combined floor area of 1,589,229 square feet; g. The proposed buildings will be of concrete tilt-up construction. The basic layout of each building will be typical for warehouse buildings. The primary(or long)axis for Building 1 will be aligned east-west and the primary axis of Building 2 will be aligned north-south. There will be three (3) potential office areas in each building. These offices could potentially be located at the • northwest, northeast, and southwest comers of Building 1, and at the northwest, northeast, and southeast comers of Building 2; h. The application contemplates "wholesale, storage, and distribution" uses. As defined in Section 17.32.020 of the Development Code, all categories of wholesale, storage, and distribution uses are permitted in this development district. Other potential uses that are permitted, subject to the availability of parking on-site, including "heavy", "heavy-minimum impact," and (with some restrictions)"medium" manufacturing; i. The parking requirement for the project, based on the proposed mix of office and warehouse floor areas in each building, is 513 parking stalls (197 stalls for Building 1 and 316 parking stalls for Building 2); the project will have 518 parking stalls (198 stalls for Building 1 and 320 parking stalls for Building 2). The trailer parking requirement, based on a ratio of one stall per dock door, is 297 parking stalls (130 stalls for Building 1 and 167 stalls for Building 2); the project will have 397 parking stalls (130 stalls for Building 1 and 267 parking stalls for Building 2); j. Following the completion of the buildings, the total building floor area will be 555,664 square feet(Building 1)and 1,033,565 square feet(Building 2)with a combined floor area of 1,589,229 square feet. The calculated FAR will be 46.8 percent (Building 1) and 50 percent (Building 2)with a combined FAR of 48.4 percent. Per Chapter 2, Figure LU-2 Land Use Plan of the General Plan,the maximum Floor Area Ratio(FAR)in the Heavy Industrial(HI)land use category is 50 percent; k. A review and request for approval of land uses are not included in this application; I. This application is in conjunction with Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19448,Tree • Removal Permit DRC2013-00315, and Uniform Sign Program DRC2013-00316. D,E,F,G-269 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-47 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00155— MIG/HOGLE-IRELAND FOR GOODMAN RANCHO SPE, LLC November 13, 2013 • Page 3 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The proposal is to construct, in two(2)phases,two(2)industrial warehouse buildings of 555,664 square feet(Building 1/Phase 1)and 1,033,565 square feet(Building 2/Phase 2)with a combined floor area of 1,589,229 square feet. The underlying General Plan designation is Heavy Industrial. b. The proposed project, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The project site is currently developed with a concrete pipe manufacturing/storage facility operated byAmeron International, Inc. There are several buildings(of various size and purpose), outdoor equipment, areas for parking and storage, and associated infrastructure on the site. Most of the existing buildings are located at the north side of the site near Arrow Route. The southeastern part of the side is primarily used for the storage of finished concrete pipes. Paving on the site is generally limited to the parking areas and the associated access driveways. The buildings, the equipment, and associated improvements will be removed to allow the construction of the proposed project. The potential land uses that would be associated with this project are consistent with the land uses within the vicinity where it is located and the expectations of • the community. The subject property and the properties to the west and south are zoned Heavy Industrial (HI) District while the properties to the east and north are zoned General Industrial (GI) District. The property at the northeast comer of Etiwanda Avenue and Arrow Route is zoned Medium (M) Residential, Etiwanda Specific Plan (South Overlay); C. The proposed development complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. The proposed development meets all standards outlined in the Development Code and the design and development standards and policies of the Planning Commission and the City including building and parking setbacks; average landscape depth; floor area ratio; parking; dock and storage area screening, landscape coverage, site planning, and architecture. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration,together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application,the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA")and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that,with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. • b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record D,E,F,G-270 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-47 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00155— MIG/HOGLE-IRELAND FOR GOODMAN RANCHO SPE, LLC November 13, 2013 Page 4 • before it, finds: (i)that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii)that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Manager of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone(909)477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached standard conditions incorporated herein by this reference. • Planning Department 1) Approval is for the construction of two (2) industrial warehouse buildings of 555,664 square feet(Building 1/Phase 1)and 1,033,565 square feet(Building 2/Phase 2)on a property comprised of three(3) parcels with a combined area of 3,255,834 square feet (74.7 acres) which is currently developed with a concrete pipe manufacturing/storage facility(operated by Ameron International)in the Heavy Industrial (HI)District located at the southwest comer of Arrow Route and Etiwanda Avenue; APN: 0229-131-04, -17, and -25. 2) Proposed land uses requiring a Conditional Use Permit as identified in Table 17.30.030-1 of the Development Code, shall require a separate review and approval by the Planning Manager and/or Planning Commission prior to submittal of documents for plan check, issuance of a Business License, and building occupancy. 3) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances. 4) Easements for the purpose of shared access, use,and maintenance of the parking lot areas, driveways, and drive aisles shall be provided. Documents for these easements shall be submitted for review by the • City and the easement recorded with the County of San Bernardino D,E,F,G-271 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-47 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00155— MIG/HOGLE-IRELAND FOR GOODMAN RANCHO SPE, LLC November 13, 2013 • Page 5 (and other agencies/entities as may be required)prior to the issuance of grading and building permits. 5) Downspouts shall not be visible from the exterior on any elevations of the buildings. All downspouts shall be routed through the interior of the building walls. 6) The output surface (face) of all lamp heads on wall-mounted light fixtures and the light standards shall be parallel to the ground in order to eliminate glare and minimize lighting on adjacent properties. The maximum height of light standards,including the base,measured from the finished surface is 25 feet. 7) New walls, including retaining walls,shall be constructed of decorative masonry block such as slumpstone or stackstone or poured in-place concrete with design elements incorporated to match the buildings. 8) All wrought iron fences and sliding gates shall be painted black or a similarly dark color. 9) At all vehicle entrances along Etiwanda Avenue and Arrow Route decorative paving shall be provided behind the public right-of-way. • These decoratively paved areas shall extend from the front property line to the setback line and have a width equal to that of the driveway. At the private driveway at the west side of the project site, the decorative paving shall be installed at the vehicle entrances that connect this driveway to the site. The final design of the enhanced pavement including, but not limited to, concrete color and geometric dimensions,shall be subject to Planning Manager reviewand approval. 10) All ground-mounted equipment and utility boxes including transformers, back-flow devices,etc. shall be screened by a minimum of two rows of shrubs spaced a minimum of 18 inches on center. This equipment shall be painted dark green. 11) All Double Detector Checks(DDC)and Fire Department Connections (FDC)required and/or proposed shall be installed at locations generally in front of,and along,the screen walls that enclose the dock areas and not within direct view or line-of-sight of the office comers of each building. The specific locations of each DDC and FDC shall require the review and approval of the Planning Department and Fire Construction Services/Fire Department. All Double Detector Checks(DDC)and Fire Department Connections (FDC) screened behind a 4-foot high block wall. These walls shall be constructed of decorative masonry block such as slumpstone or stackstone or poured in-place concrete with design elements incorporated to match the buildings. • 12) The employee lunch areas shall have overhead trellises with cross members spaced no more than 18 inches on center with minimum dimensions of 4 inches by 12 inches. D,E,F,G-272 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-47 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00155 —MIG/HOGLE-IRELAND FOR GOODMAN RANCHO SPE, LLC November 13, 2013 Page 6 • 13) All doors (roll-up, dock doors, emergency access)shall be painted to match the color of the adjacent wall or glass panel. 14) Outdoor furniture shall be provided in the outdoor employee eating areas. All outdoor furniture (tables, benches, trash receptacles, bollards, etc.)shall be permanent, uniform, and of durable materials. 15) All trash enclosures shall be constructed per City standard. The design of the trash enclosures shall incorporate the materials, finish, color, and trim used on the buildings. 16) The final design of the art installation that is proposed at the northeast comer of the project site near the southwest comer of the intersection of Etiwanda Avenue and Arrow Route shall be submitted to the City for review and approval by the Planning Department prior to the submittal of construction plans to the Building and Safety Department, and the installation and construction of the feature. 17) All Conditions of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19448, Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00315, and Uniform Sign Program ORC2013-00316 shall apply. 18) If vegetation removal, soil disturbance, or any other construction • related activity is to occur during the avian nesting season(February 1 through August 31), a preconstruction nesting survey shall be conducted prior to initiation of construction. If nests are discovered, they should be avoided through establishment of an appropriate buffer setback, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist and consistent with CDFW protocols. The temporary "no construction" area would have to be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and left the nest, then construction in the area could resume. If initial ground disturbing activities or site clearing is proposed to occur outside of the nesting season (September 1 through January 31), then a preconstruction survey would not be required and construction could commence unimpeded Ennineerina Department 1) Arrow Route frontage improvements shall be in accordance with City "Major Arterial"standards including but not limited to, curb and gutter, asphalt pavement,ADA access ramps,9500 Lumen HPSV streetlights, commercial drive approaches, curvilinear sidewalk and street trees to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. a. Shared driveway on the west property line shall align with a future • "Local Industrial" cul-de-sac on the north side of Arrow Route. D,E,F,G-273 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-47 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00155—MIG/HOGLE-IRELAND FOR GOODMAN RANCHO SPE, LLC November 13, 2013 • Page 7 Drive approach shall be street-type with ADA access ramps with curb returns to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. b. Remove existing drive approach and replace with curb, gutter and sidewalk. On site fencing and gate for the existing driveway location should also be removed. C. Modify on-site drive aisles as required to utilize the new driveway. d. Additional driveways on Arrow Route shall be per Standard Drawing 101, Type C, with a minimum width of 35 feet, a maximum width of 50 feet and curb returns to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. e. The most easterly proposed driveway on Arrow Route shall be right tum only. f. Widen south side of Arrow Route to allow for dual left tum lanes and a right tum lane at the Etiwanda Avenue intersection. Widening at the intersection shall be 48 feet from existing centerline to curb at the BCR,with an additional 7 feet of right-of- way for curb adjacent sidewalk along the right tum lane. Maintain a 480-foot right tum lane and transition back to a standard half street section, of 36 feet in a 50-foot right-of-way, approximately 600 feet west of the Etiwanda Avenue centerline. • g. Modify existing traffic signal and equipment to allow for dual left tum lanes and an eastbound overlapping right tum at the Etiwanda Avenue intersection. h. Protect existing streetlights. Provide additional 9500 Lumen HPSV streetlights, as required. i. Protect existing curb and gutter, repair or relocate as required. j. Protect existing R26(S), "No Stopping" signs. k. Provide traffic signing and striping as required, including 100 feet of double yellow line on site on the centerline of the new shared driveway and any other required on-site striping. 2) Provide an easement on the final map, following the new shared driveway alignment along the west property line for all adjacent properties currently using the common drive aisle to access the relocated drive approach. a. Show existing Traffic Signal easement on the final map. Modify as needed to accommodate actual signal design. 3) Install a traffic signal at the intersection of the private drive and the future Yellow Wood Court on Arrow Route. Interim signal design shall accommodate an existing offset driveway on the north side of Arrow until the property at the northwest comer of the future street develops. • 4) Provide private drainage easements between the parcels on the map. D,E,F,G-274 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-47 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00155— MIG/HOGLE-IRELAND FOR GOODMAN RANCHO SPE, LLC November 13, 2013 Page 8 • 5) Etiwanda Avenue frontage improvements shall be in accordance with City "Major Arterial" standards including but not limited to, curb and gutter, asphalt pavement, ADA access ramps, 9500 Lumen HPSV streetlights,commercial drive approaches, sidewalk and street trees to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. a. Widen west side of Etiwanda Avenue to allow for dual left tum lanes at the Arrow Route intersection. Widening at the intersection shall be 38 feet from existing centerline to curb at the ECR, with an additional 12 feet for right-of-way. Maintain approximately 350 feet for northbound left tum median deceleration plus storage and transition back to a standard half street section, of 36 feet in a 50-foot right-of-way, approximately 550 feet south of the Arrow Route centerline. b. Modify traffic signal and equipment to allow for dual left tum lanes and a northbound overlapping right tum at the Arrow Route intersection. C. Transition to existing curb and gutter south of the south project boundary to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. The developer shall receive credit against,and reimbursement of costs in excess of, the Transportation Development Fee for widening necessary to achieve a southbound number two lane • (asphalt only). The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover costs in excess of impact fees. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. e. Provide 9500 lumen HPSV streetlights, as required. f. Provide traffic striping and signage, as required. g. Protect existing R26(S), "No Stopping" signs. h. Provide a curbside drain outlet for BMP basin overflow channel. 6) Provide a Bus Bay— Right Tum Lane, per Standard Drawing 119, for the northerly driveway on Etiwanda Avenue, in addition to the intersection widening. Right-of-way along the right tum lane shall provide at least 7 feet for curb adjacent sidewalk. 7) Modify the Traffic Signal at the Etiwanda/Arrow Route intersection to accommodate the widening and additional turning lanes on both streets including upgrading to full protected left turns. a. Install interim striping to match up with existing single left tum lanes on opposing legs of this intersection. Also provide an ultimate striping plan for dual left tum lanes on all four legs. • D,E,F,G-275 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-47 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00155— MIG/HOGLE-IRELAND FOR GOODMAN RANCHO SPE, LLC November 13, 2013 • Page 9 8) Install a traffic signal at the intersection of Etiwanda and Whittram Avenues. a. Project drive approach on west side shall be street-type with ADA access ramps and curb returns to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. b. Whittram Avenue interim street improvements on east side shall be to City"Industrial Collector" standards. South curb line shall align with south edge of project driveway. C. Curb return at southeast comer of the intersection shall be installed at its ultimate location. Interim 44-foot width of Whittram Avenue will result in a centerline offset 10 feet south of ultimate. Provide pavement transition and lane striping to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. A power pole may need to be relocated. d. Provide ADA access ramps on all four comers, including the interim curb return on the northeast comer. e. The developer shall receive credit against,and reimbursement of costs in excess of, the Transportation Development Fee for permanent improvements installed in their ultimate locations, in conformance with City policy. If the developer fails to submit for • said reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. 9) Provide a construction easement in favor of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and an access easement to the drive approach that aligns with Whittram Avenue, in favor of properties to the south and southeast (APN 0229-131-07, -15, -16, -26 & -27 and 0229-162-14 & -15), the City for maintenance purposes and all applicable utilities. These easements will only be utilized when the City reconstructs the Etiwanda/Whittram intersection to accommodate an overpass of the Metrolink right-of-way. 10) Parkways shall slope at 2 percent from the top of curb to one foot behind the sidewalk along all street frontages. 11) Metropolitan Water District(MWD)shall approve all plans that impact their easement, including utilities, storm drains, slopes, street trees, and landscaping. A note shall be included on all pertinent plans requiring Metropolitan Water District Operations Maintenance Branch to be notified two working days prior to starting any work in the vicinity of their easement. 12) A permit shall be obtained from Metropolitan Water District for any work within their right-of-way, including grading. • 13) Install Area 10 Master Plan Storm Drain facilities in Etiwanda Avenue, from 6th Street to Arrow Route,to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. D,E,F,G-276 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-47 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00155—MIG/HOGLE-IRELAND FOR GOODMAN RANCHO SPE, LLC November 13, 2013 Page 10 • Standard drainage fees for the site shall be credited to the cost of permanent master plan facilities, in accordance with City policy. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover over sizing costs, in excess of fees, from future development within the same tributary area. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public improvements being accepted by the City,all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. a. Replace City Drawing No. 1661 with Drawing No. 1335-D currently in plan check. b. Drainage fees have already been collected for 11 acres (developed portion of APN 229-131-25) so the developer's fee requirement(credit)will be reduced accordingly. 14) General City Master Plan drainage fees shall be paid for the portion of APN 229-131-17 that falls within that drainage area. 15) The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical, except for 66 kV electrical)on the project side of Arrow Route shall be undergrounded from the first pole on the east side of Etiwanda Avenue to the first pole off site west of the west project boundary, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. All • services crossing Arrow Route shall be undergrounded at the same time. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future redevelopment as it occurs on the opposite side of the street. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. a. 66 kV poles may need to be relocated for the intersection widening. 16) An in-lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical, except for 66 kV electrical)on the opposite side of Etiwanda Avenue shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of building permits. The fee shall be one half the City adopted unit amount times the length from the center of Arrow Route to the south project boundary. a. In-lieu fees have already been collected for the 658-foot frontage of APN 229-131-25. b. All services crossing Etiwanda Avenue shall be removed or placed underground. 17) Public improvement plans shall be 90 percent complete prior to the issuance of grading permits. Public improvement plans shall be 100 • percent complete, signed by the City Engineer, and an improvement D,E,F,G-277 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-47 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00155— MIG/HOGLE-IRELAND FOR GOODMAN RANCHO SPE, LLC November 13, 2013 • Page 11 agreement and bonds executed by the developer, prior to building permit issuance. 18) If developer decides to phase installation of the public improvements, the following improvement certificate shall be included on the parcel map: a. Complete the master plan storm drain in Etiwanda Avenue with the first development phase. b. Complete full intersection improvements at Arrow Route and Etiwanda Avenue with the first development phase. This will include the traffic signal modification, relocation of existing catch basins and transitions back to existing pavement widths to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. C. All frontage improvements on Arrow Route shall be completed with development of Parcel 1, including the traffic signal for the shared project driveway at the west property line. d. All frontage improvements on Etiwanda Avenue shall be completed with development of Parcel 2, including the traffic signal at W hittram Avenue and related improvements on the east side of Etiwanda Avenue. • 19) Prior to issuance of construction permits,the applicant shall coordinate with the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the City of Ontario the fees and method of payment for constructing the street improvements identified in the Supplemental Traffic Analysis prepared by Kunzman Associates, Inc. on November 4, 2013 to ensure that the street intersections of Etiwanda Avenue and 4th Street, and Etiwanda Avenue and Napa Street,operate at levels of service(LOS)consistent with the General Plans of both the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the City of Ontario. Building and Safety Department—Grading Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit 1) Prior to the issuance of a grading permit a non-category Water Quality Management Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official. 2) Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a drainage easement or letter from the downstream property owners accepting concentrated drainage flows. 3) Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho • Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. D,E,F,G-278 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-47 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00155— MIG/HOGLE-IRELAND FOR GOODMAN RANCHO SPE, LLC November 13, 2013 Page 12 • 4) Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number(WDID). 5) A Grading Bond will be required to be submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department Official for review and approval prior to issuance of a Grading Permit. 6) All roof drainage flowing to the public right of way(Etiwanda Avenue) must drain under the sidewalk through a parkway culvert approved by the Engineering Services Department. 7) The applicant shall provide a copy of EPA Form 7520-16(Inventory of Injection Wells) with the Facility ID Number assigned to the Building and Safety Services Department Official prior to issuance of the Grading Permit. Prior to issuance of a Wall Permit 1) On engineered combination garden/retaining walls along the property boundary the structural calculations for the wall shall assume a level toe/heel at the adjacent off-site property(i.e. a manufactured slope is not present). Is 2) A copy of the Grading Special Conditions of Approval shall be included within the engineered wall plans and calculations. Environmental Mitigation Air Quality 1) Prior to issuance of building permits, the project proponent shall submit, to the satisfaction of the Planning Department, a Coating Restriction Plan (CRP), consistent with South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) guidelines and a letter agreeing to include in any construction contracts and/or subcontracts a requirement that the contractors adhere to the CRP. The CRP measures shall be implemented to the satisfaction of City Building Director. These may include the following: • That volatile organic compounds(VOC)of proposed architectural coatings not exceed 25 for interior applications. • That volatile organic compounds(VOC)of proposed architectural coatings not exceed 75 g/I for exterior applications. This measure shall conform to the performance standard that emissions of volatile organic compounds from application of interior or • exterior coatings shall not exceed the daily emissions thresholds established by the South Coast Air Quality Management District. The D.E.F.G-279 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-47 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00155 —MIG/HOGLE-IRELAND FOR GOODMAN RANCHO SPE, LLC • November 13, 2013 Page 13 CRP shall specify use of High-Volume, Low Pressure (HVLP) spray guns for application of coatings. 2) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers'specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 3) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits,the developer shall submit Construction Plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized,or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD)as well as City Planning staff. 4) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. • 5) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 6) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • D.E.F.G-280 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-47 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00155— MIG/HOGLE-IRELAND FOR GOODMAN RANCHO SPE, LLC November 13, 2013 • Page 14 • Suspend grading operations during high winds(i.e.,wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 7) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce Particulate Matter (PM10) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 8) Chemical soil-stabilizers(approved by SCAQMD and RW QCB)shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. 9) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel- powered equipment where feasible. 10) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shutoff equipment when not in use. Long Term Emissions • 11) Prior to issuance of occupancy permits or business licenses, future tenants of the proposed project shall submit a report to the Planning Department identifying all diesel engine powered trucks within the occupant's fleet and verification that vehicles have been equipped with a filter that reduces oxides of nitrogen by a minimum of 25 percent below typical operating conditions as verified by the California Air Resources Board through executive order, or that vehicles have been equipped with control technologies or powered by engines that emit oxides of nitrogen at levels that will not otherwise cause the South Coast Air Quality Management District(SCAQMD)daily threshold for oxides of nitrogen. This report shall be updated upon occupancy by a new tenant. 12) Provide preferential parking to high occupancy vehicles and shuttle services. 13) Improve thermal integrity of the buildings and reduce thermal load with automated time clocks or occupant sensors. 14) Landscape with native and/or drought-resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 15) Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planting • programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC-01 measure. D.E.F.G-281 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-47 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00155— MIG/HOGLE-IRELAND FOR GOODMAN RANCHO SPE, LLC November 13, 2013 • Page 15 16) All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods(i.e., in excess of 10 minutes). 17) All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools. 18) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas. 19) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible. Biological Resources 1) The trees that are removed shall be replaced with new trees,on a one- to-one basis, of a minimum 15-gallon size. Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or • during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities,to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. • Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with Section 21083.2 Archeological resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, including but not limited to, avoiding archeological sites, capping or covering site with soil, planning the site as a park or green space or paying an in-kind mitigation fee. • Prepare a technical resources management report,documenting • the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report, D,E,F,G-282 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-47 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00155—MIG/HOGLE-IRELAND FOR GOODMAN RANCHO SPE, LLC November 13, 2013 Page 16 • with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures(i.e., paleontological monitoring)that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay,to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for • documentation in the . summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository(i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy to the report to San Bernardino County Museum. Geology and Soils 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB)daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM10 emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 • hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. D,E,F,G-283 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-47 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00155— MIG/HOGLE-IRELAND FOR GOODMAN RANCHO SPE, LLC • November 13, 2013 Page 17 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Short Term (Construction) GHG Emissions 1) The project must comply with all rules that assist in reducing short-term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAW MD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil- stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 2) The construction contractor shall select construction equipment based on low-emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures' specification. 3) Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 minutes. 4) Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline- or diesel-powered engines where feasible. • 5) Construction should be timed so as not to interfere with peak-hour traffic. 6) Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be supported and encouraged for construction crew. Long Term (Operational) GHG Emission 7) Construction and Building materials shall be produced and/or manufactured locally. Use "Green Building Materials" such as materials that are resource efficient,recycled,and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low-volatile-organic-compound (VOC) materials. 8) Design all buildings to exceed California Building Code Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of: • Increased insulation • Limit air leakage through the structure • Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances • Landscape and developed site utilizing shade, prevailing winds and landscaping • Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems D,E,F,G-284 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-47 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00155 — MIG/HOGLE-IRELAND FOR GOODMAN RANCHO SPE, LLC November 13, 2013 • Page 18 • Install light colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements • Install solar or light emitting diodes (LED's)for outdoor lighting. 9) Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and include the following: • Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. • Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available and/or install the infrastructure to deliver and use reclaimed water. • Design building to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets, dual flush toilets and waterless urinals/water heaters. • Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non- vegetated surfaces. 10) Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste. Provide interior • and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educated employees about reducing waste and about recycling. Hydrology and Water Quality Construction Activities 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Building Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)specifically identifying Best Management Practices(BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared,included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California,and b)An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that • any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this D.E.F.G-285 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-47 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00155— MIG/HOGLE-IRELAND FOR GOODMAN RANCHO SPE, LLC • November 13, 2013 Page 19 project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by Fuscoe Engineering, Inc. on July 3, 2013)to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 6) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be • submitted to the City for review acid approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. Grading Activities 7) Prior to issuance of building permits,the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices(BMPs)that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 8) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent(NOI)to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System(NPDES)General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained(i.e.,a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Noise 1) Prior to the issuance of any grading plans a construction-related noise • mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. The Plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and D.E.F.G-286 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13.-47 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00155— MIG/HOGLE-IRELAND FOR GOODMAN RANCHO SPE, LLC November 13, 2013 • Page 20 how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction. 2) Business operations shall maintain a noise level at 60dB or less during the hours of 10 PM until 7 AM. No loading and unloading activities including opening, closing, or other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials, garbage cans, or other similar objects between the hours of 10 PM and 7 AM in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to residential areas. 3) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m.and 6:30 a.m.on weekdays, including Saturday,or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 4) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050,as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then • construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 5) The perimeter screen wall shall be constructed as early as possible in the first phase. 6) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m.and 6:30 a.m.on weekdays, including Saturday,or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. • D.E.F.G-287 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-47 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00155—MIG/HOGLE-IRELAND FOR GOODMAN RANCHO SPE, LLC • November 13, 2013 Page 21 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2013. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Frances Howdyshell, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced,passed,and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of November 2013, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: • NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: • D.E.F.G-288 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT#: DRC2013-00155 SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICANT: MIG/HOLGLE-IRELAND FOR GOODMAN RANCHO SPE, LLC LOCATION: SWC ETIWANDA AVENUE AND ARROW ROUTE; APN: 0229-131-04, 17- 25 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: �. General Requirements Completion Date 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees,. because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 13-47 or Approval Letter, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 3. The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below. —I-1— The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Manager hearing. a) Mitigated Negative Declaration -$2,206.25 • 1 D,E.F,G-289 Project No.DRC2013-00155 Completion Date B. Time Limits 1. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not —/—/— commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which —/—/— include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all —/—/— Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager. 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building —/—/— Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Services Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance and final acceptance granted prior to occupancy. 4. Revised Site Plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be —/—/— submitted for Planning Manager review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for —/—/— consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, • building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development —/—/— Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 7. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall —/—/— be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 8. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, —/—/— including proper illumination and in conformance with Building and Safety Services Department standards, the Municipal Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department (RCFD) Standards. 9. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property —/—/— owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Manager and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits. D. SHOPPING CENTERS 1. Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours. —/—/- 2. The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and in no event shall —/—/— • trash and debris remain for more than 24 hours. 2 D,E,F,G-290 Project No.DRC2013-00155 Completion Date • 3. Signs shall be conveniently posted for "no overnight parking" and for "employee parking only." 4. All operations and businesses shall be conducted to comply with the following standards which shall be incorporated into the lease agreements for all tenants: a. Noise Level - All commercial activities shall not create any noise that would exceed an exterior noise level of 65 dB during the hours of 10 p.m. until 7 a.m. and 70 dB during the hours of 7 a.m. until 10 p.m. b. Loading and Unloading - No person shall cause the loading, unloading, opening, closing, or other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials, garbage cans, or other similar objects between the hours of 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. unless otherwise specified herein, in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to a residential area. E. Building Design 1. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections shall be screened from all sides and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically more than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet, shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent nature with the building design and is detailed consistent with the building. Any roof-mounted mechanical • equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically less than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet shall be painted consistent with the color scheme of the building. Details shall be included in building plans. 2. For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main building colors. F. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 17 feet long with a required 1-foot overhang (e.g., over a curb stop). 2. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet. 3. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. G. Trip Reduction 1. Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided at a rate equivalent to 5 percent of all required motorized vehicle parking, with a minimum of one rack with a capacity for two bicycles. 2. All development projects subject to TDM (Transportation Demand Management) provisions shall reserve and designate at least 10 percent of the employee parking spaces for the project for ridesharing vehicles by marking such spaces"CarpooINanpool Only.". 3. Category 5 telephone cable or fiber optic cable shall be provided for office buildings and • other non-residential development. 3 D,E,F,G-291 Project No.DRC2013-00155 Completion Date 4. Transit improvements such as bus shelters, bus pullouts, and bus pads shall be provided. _/_/_ • Bus shelters shall also include a bench, a trash receptacle, and an adjoining bike rack (minimum 3 capacity) on a concrete pad. Bus shelters shall be located outside public right- of-way and shall be privately maintained. 5. All development projects where TDM (Transportation Demand Management) provisions apply shall provide shower and locker facilities for use by employees or tenants who commute to the site by bicycle or walking. Such facilities shall be clearly indicated on all development/improvement plans. One shower and eight lockers with minimum dimensions of twelve inches (12") by eighteen inches (18") by thirty-six inches(36") shall be provided for each two hundred (200) employees or fraction thereof, based on the equivalent development size data. The shower and locker facilities must be located convenient to one another and should be located near the employee bicycle parking facilities whenever possible. 6. Office parks where TDM requirements apply shall provide onsite video conference facilities. H. Landscaping 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Manager review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. For development occurring in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, the landscape plans will also be reviewed by Fire Construction Services. 2. A minimum of 20 percent of trees planted within industrial projects, and a minimum of 30 percent within commercial and office projects, shall be specimen size trees -24-inch box or • larger. 3. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls. 4. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building. 5. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Manager review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Services Department. 6. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 7. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Services Department. 8. Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for Planning Manager review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. These criteria shall encourage the natural growth characteristics of the selected tree species. 9. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water efficient landscaping per Development Code Chapter 17.82. I. Signs • 1. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance 4 D.F.F_G-29? Project No.DRC2013-00155 Completion Date • and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs. J. Environmental 1. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Manager in the amount of $ 581 prior to the issuance of Building Permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. K. Other Agencies 1. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to Planning Manager review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY SERVICES DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S). �. Building and Safety Industrial and Commercial Standard Conditions 1. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan; C. Floor Plan; d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan; e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and g. Planning Department Project Number(i.e., SUBTT, SUBTPM, MDR, CUP, DRC, etc.) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, two sets of energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance. • 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. 5. Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the Building and Safety Services Department. 5 D.E.F.G-293 Project No.DRC2013-00155 Completion Date 6. Developers wishing to participate in the Community Energy Efficiency Program (CEEP) can _/_/_ • contact the Building and Safety Services Department staff for information and submittal requirements. Site Development 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be marked with the project file number (i.e., DRC2013-00155). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Services Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of Building Permits for a new commercial or industrial development project or major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees. The applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Services Department prior to permits issuance. 3. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tract/parcel map recordation and prior to issuance of Building Permits. 4. For projects using septic tank facilities, shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval prior to the issuance of Septic Tank Permits, and prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 5. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday _/_/_ • through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. 6. Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Department public counter). 7. All commercial/public/multi-family development swimming pool plans shall be submitted to the County of San Bernardino's Environmental Health Services Department for review and approval prior to approval from the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 8. The following is required for side yard use for increase in allowable area: _/—/— a. Provide a reduced Site Plan (8 1/2-inches by 11 inches), which indicates the non- buildable easement. b. Recorded "Covenant and Agreement for the Maintenance of a Non-Buildable Easement," which is signed by the appropriate property owner(s). New Structures 1. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness. 2. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. 3. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's"high wind" instructions. _/—/_ • 6 D.E.F.G-294 Project No.DRC2013-00155 Completion Date • 4. Plans for food preparation areas shall be approved by County of San Bernardino Environmental Health Services prior to issuance of Building Permits. 5. Provide draft stops in attic areas in accordance with CBC Section 1505. 6. Roofing materials shall be Class"A." —/—/- 7. Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with CBC . 8. Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC. 9. Walls and floors separating dwelling units in the same building shall be in accordance with the CBC. 10. Provide smoke and heat venting in accordance with CBC. 11. Upon plan check submittal, additional requirements may be needed. M. Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The grading and drainage plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual grading and drainage plan. • 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 3. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or engineering geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 4. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 5. A separate Grading and Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer. 6. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit. 7. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, that plan shall be a separate plan/permit from the Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 8. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a Grading Permit. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. • 9. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit. 7 D.E.F.G-295 Project No.DRC2013-00155 Completion Date 10. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to obtain written permission from the adjacent —/—/— • property owners to construct walls on property lines or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s)to be constructed off-set from the property line. 11. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on-site construction —/—/— where possible, and provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 12. All slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot off-set from the public right-of-way or adjacent private —/—/— property. 13. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the latest adopted —/—/— California Plumbing Code. 14. The maximum parking stall gradient is 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be —/—/— constructed per the current adopted California Building Code. 15. The final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100 feet —/—/— beyond the project boundary. 16. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill —/—/— combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a Grading Permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 17. The precise Grading and Drainage Plan shall follow the format provided in the City of —/—/— Rancho Cucamonga handout"Information for Grading Plans and Permit." 18. Grading Inspections: —/—/— a. Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall • request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the Grading Permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b. The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Services Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i. The bottom of the over-excavation; ii. Completion of rough grading - The grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Services Department front counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv. The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. 19. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy the engineer of record shall certify the —/—/— functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) best management practices (BMP) devices. 20. Roof storm water is not permitted to flow over the public parkway and shall be directed to an —/—/— • under parkway culvert per City of Rancho Cucamonga requirements prior to issuance of a Grading Permit. 8 D,E,F,G-296 Project No.DRC2013-00155 Completion Date � HE APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT, (909) 77-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: N. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline): 50-55 total feet on Arrow Route 50 total feet on Etiwanda Avenue 2. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. 3. Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or prior to the issuance of Building Permits, where no map is involved. 4. Reciprocal parking agreements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all common roads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by CC & R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to, or concurrent with, the final parcel map. 5. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or noted on the final map. • 6. All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be quit-claimed or delineated on the final map. 7. Easements for public sidewalks placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City. 8. Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum of 7 feet measured from the face of curbs. O. Street Improvements 1. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the .City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. , 2. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Curb 8 A.C. Side- Drive Street Street Comm Median Bike Street Name Gutter Pvmt walk Appr. Lights Trees Trail I Island Trail Other • Arrow Route X X © X X X (e) Etiwanda Avenue X X X X X X (e) Whittram Avenue X I X (e) 9 D.E.F.G-297 Project No.DRC2013-00155 Completion Date Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction • and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (e)ADA Access Ramps 3. Improvement Plans and Construction: —/—/— a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety —!—/— lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a —/—/— construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. C. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, —/—/— and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or —/—/— reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: —1—/- 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum • of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City —/—!— Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with —/—/— adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be I-1— be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to submittal for first plan check. check. 4. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in —I—I— accordance with the City's street tree program. 5. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The —/—!— completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on - Sheet— (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. • 10 D,E,F,G-298 Project No.DRC2013-00155 Completion Date Min. • Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing Size Qty. Arrow Route Gingko biloba Maidenhair Tree 5' 20' 15 "Fairmount" O.C. Gal Etiwanda Avenue Gijera parviflora Australian Willow 5' 25' 15 O.C. Gal Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 6. Add the following note to any private landscape plans that show street trees: "All —/—/— improvements within the public right-of-way, including street trees, shall be installed per the public improvement plans." If there is a discrepancy between the public and private plans, the street improvement plans will govern. 7. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. or. Public Maintenance Areas 1. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and —/—/— Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. Q. Drainage and Flood Control 1. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final —/—/— map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. 2. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage —/—/— entering the property from adjacent areas. 3. Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe —/—/— measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk. R. Improvement Completion 1. If the required public improvements are not completed prior to approval of the final parcel —/—/— map, an improvement security accompanied by an agreement executed by the Developer and the City will be required for: ALL PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS • 11 D,E,F,G-299 Project No.DRC2013-00155 Completion Date • S. Utilities 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 3. Water Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Valley Water District(CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 4. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. 5. Developer shall execute a Line Extension Agreement for electric service and shall construct electrical distribution distribution facilities in accordance with such agreement and shall construct electrical distribution facilities in accordance with such agreement and Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility requirements and dedicate such facilities to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility. The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility shall be the electrical service • provider for all project related development. T. General Requirements and Approvals 1. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to Building Permit issuance if no map is involved. 2. Prior to the issuance of Building Permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50 percent of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department when the first Building Permit application is submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: The project must comply in design and constructed in accordance with the 2010 California Building and Fire Codes, the RCFPD Ordinance FD50 and the RCFPD Standards. The RCFPD ordinance, procedures & standards which are referenced in this document can be access on the web at www.citvofrc.us. U. INDUSTRIAL FIRE STANDARD CONDITIONS • FSC -1 Public and Private Water Supply Design Guidelines for Fire Hydrants: Reference the RCFPD Standard 5-10. —/—/- 12 D,E.F.G-300 Project No.DRC2013-00155 Completion Date • FSC -2 Fire Flow 1. The required fire flow for this project is calculated gallons per minute at a minimum residual —/—/— pressure of 20 pounds per square inch. This requirement is made in accordance with California Fire Code Appendix, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances. The required minimum fire flow for this project may be reduced by 50 percent when automatic fire sprinklers are installed. 2. Public fire hydrants located within the immediate vicinity of the proposed project may be used to provide the required fire flow subject to Fire District review and approval. Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow. 3. Fire protection water supply plans are required for all projects that must extend the existing —/—/— water supply to or onto the site. Building Permits will not be issued until the fire protection water supply plans are approved. 4. On all Site Plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600 feet of —/—/— the proposed project site. FSC-3 Pre-requisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Prior to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire sprinkler system, the applicant shall —/—/— submit plans, specifications and Calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground supply piping. Approval of the underground supply piping system must be obtained prior to submitting the overhead fire sprinkler system plans. • FSC-4 Requirements for Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Automatic fire sprinklers shall be installed in buildings as required by the current editions of the —/—/— California Fire Code, the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance and/or any other applicable standards that require an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed. FSC-5 Fire Alarm System &Sprinkler Monitoring 1. The current edition of California Building/Fire Codes, the RCFPD Ordinance and Fire Alarm —/—/— Standard 9-3 require most fire sprinkler systems to be monitored by a Central Station sprinkler monitoring system. A manual and or automatic fire alarm system may also be required based on the use and occupancy of the building. Plan check approval and a Building Permit are required prior to the installation of a fire alarm or a sprinkler monitoring system. Plans and specifications shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services in accordance with RCFPD Fire Alarm Standards. Refer to the specified documents for the system requirements. FSC-6 Fire District Site Access: Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private roads, drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes. Please reference the RCFPD Fire Department Access Roadways Standard 5-1. 1. Location of Access: All portions of the structures 1st story exterior wall shall be located —/—/— within 150-feet of Fire District vehicle access, measured on an approved route around the exterior of the building. Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates and fences are deemed obstructions. • 2. Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are: —/—/— a. The minimum unobstructed width is 26 feet. b. The maximum inside turn radius shall be 24 feet. 13 D,E,F,G-301 Project No.DRC2013-00155 Completion Date C. The minimum outside turn radius shall be 50 feet. • d. The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 45 feet. e. The minimum vertical clearance is 14 feet, 6 inches. f. At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20 feet on each side. g. The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9 degrees or 20 percent. h. The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12 percent. i. Support a minimum load of 80,000 pounds gross vehicle weight(GVW). j. Trees and shrubs planted adjacent to the fire lane shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14 feet, 6 inches from the ground up. Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus. 3. Access Doorways: "Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be —/—/— provided as follows: a. In buildings without high-piled storage, access shall be provided in accordance with the current edition of California Building/Fire Codes and/or any other applicable standards. b. In buildings with high-piled storage access doors shall be provided in each 100 lineal feet or major fraction thereof, of the exterior wall that faces the required access roadways. When railways are installed provisions shall be made to maintain Fire District access to all required openings. 4. Access Walkways: Hardscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus —/—/— • access road to all required building exterior openings. 5. Building Access: Knox boxes for site and building access are required in accordance with —/—/— RCFPD Standard 5-9. 6. Commercial/Industrial Gates: Any gate installed across a Fire Department access road —/—/— shall be in accordance with Fire District Standards. The following design requirements apply: a. Prior to the fabrication and installation of the gates, plans are required to be submitted to Fire Construction Services (FCS) for approval. Upon the completion of the installation and before placing the gates in service, inspection and final acceptance must be requested from FCS. b. Gates must slide open horizontally or swing inward. C. Gates may be motorized or manual. d. When fully open, the minimum clearance dimension of drive access shall be 20 feet. e. Manual gates must be equipped with a RCFPD lock. The lock must be purchased at the Fire Administration Office. f. Motorized gates must open at the rate of one-foot per second. g. The motorized gate actuation mechanism must be equipped with a manual override device and a fail-safe or battery backup feature to open the gate or release the locking Mechanism in case of power failure or mechanical malfunction. h. Motorized gates shall be equipped with a Knox override key switch. The switch must • be installed outside the gate in a visible and unobstructed location. 14 D,E,F,G-302 Project No.DRC2013-00155 Completion Date • i. For motorized gates, a traffic loop device must be installed to allow exiting from the complex. j. If traffic pre-emption devices (TPD) are to be installed, the device, location and operation must be approved by the Fire Chief prior to installation. Bi-directional or multiple sensors may be required due to complexity of the various entry configurations. 7. Fire Lane Identification: Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes. A Site Plan —/—/— illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department for approval. 8. Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly —/—/— noted on the Site Plan. A copy of the approved Alternative Method application, if applicable, must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department for plan review. 9. Roof Access: must be in accordance with the RCFPD Roof Access Standard. There shall —/—/— be a means of fire department access from the exterior walls of the buildings on to the roofs of all commercial, industrial and multi-family residential structures more than 10,000 square feet or with roof more than 15 feet in height and less than 75 feet above the level of the fire access road. a. This access must be reachable by the Fire Department aerial ladder. b. A minimum of one ladder point with a fixed ladder shall be provided in buildings with construction features, or high parapets that inhibit roof access. • C. The number of ladder points may be required to be increased, depending on the building size and configuration. d. Regardless of the parapet height or construction features the approved ladder point shall be identified in accordance to the roof access standard. e. Where the entire roof access is restricted by high parapet walls or other obstructions, a permanently mounted access ladder is required. f. Multiple access ladders may be required for larger buildings. g. Ladder construction must be in accordance with the RCFPD Roof Access Standard Appendix. h. A Site Plan showing the locations of the roof ladder shall be submitted during plan check. i. Ladder points shall face a fire access roadway(s). FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits —/—/— Listed are those Fire Code permits commonly associated with the business operations and/or building construction. Plan check submittal is required with the permit application for approval of the permit; field inspection is required prior to permit issuance. General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not specifically described below, which in the judgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property. • Aerosol Products • • Magnesium Working • Application of Flammable Finishes • Motor Vehicle Fuel-Dispensing Operation 15 D,E,F,G-303 Project No.DRC2013-00155 Completion Date • Automobile Wrecking Yards • • Open Burning • Battery Systems • Organic Coating • Candles and open flames in public assemblies • Ovens • Cellulose Nitrate • Powder Coating • Compressed Gases • Public Assembly • Cryogenics • Pyrotechnical Special Effects • Dry Cleaning Plants • Radioactive Materials • Dust-Producing Processes and Operations • Refrigeration Systems • Explosive or Blasting Agents • Repair Garages • Flammable and Combustible Liquids • Rubbish Handling Operations • Fruit Ripening Plants • Spraying or Dipping Operations • • Hazardous Materials • Tents, Canopies and/or Air Supported Structures • High-Pile Combustible Storage (HPS) • Tire Storage • Liquefied Petroleum Gases • Welding and Cutting Operations • LPG or Gas Fuel Vehicles in Assembly Buildings • Wood Products/Lumber Yards / I FSC-11 Hazardous Materials—Submittal to the County of San Bernardino --- The San Bernardino County Fire Department shall review your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan for compliance with minimum standards. Contact the San Bernardino County Fire, Hazardous Materials Division at (909) 387-4631 for forms and assistance. The County Fire Department is the Cal/EPA Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. If the facility is a NEW business, a Certificate of Occupancy issued by the Building and Safety Services Department will not be finalized until the San Bernardino County Fire Department reviews your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan. California Government Code, Section 65850.2 prohibits the City from issuing a final Certificate of Occupancy unless the applicant has met or is meeting specific hazardous materials disclosure requirements. A Risk Management Program (RMP) may also be required if regulation • substances are to be used or stored at the new facility. 16 D,E,F,G-304 Project No.DRC2013-00155 Completion Date • _/ / 2. Any business that operates on rented or leased property which is required to submit aplan -- is also required to submit a notice to the owner of the property in writing stating that the business is subject to the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan mandates and has complied with the provisions. The tenant must provide a copy of the Plan to the property owner within five (5) working days, if requested by the owner. FSC-12 Hazardous Materials - Submittal to Fire Construction Services --- 1. Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction of buildings and/or the installation of equipment designed to store, use or dispense hazardous materials in accordance with the current editions of the California Building, Fire, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical Codes, RCFPD Ordinances and other implemented and/or adopted standards. FSC-13 Alternate Method Application - Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will review all requests for alternate method, when submitted. The request must be submitted on the Fire District "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the review fee. FCS-14 Map Recordation --- 1. Reciprocal Agreements for Fire Department Emergency Access and Water Supply are required on this project. The project appears to be located on a property that is being subdivided. The reciprocal agreement is required to be recorded between property owners and the Fire District. The recorded agreement shall include a copy of the Site Plan. The Fire Construction Services shall approve the agreement, prior to recordation. The • agreement shall be recorded with the County of San Bernardino, Recorder's Office. — 2. Reciprocal Access Agreement - Please provide a permanent access agreement between —/—/ the owners granting irrevocable and a non-exclusive easement, favoring the Fire District to gain access to the subject property. The agreement shall include a statement that no obstruction, gate, fence, building or other structure shall be placed within the dedicated access, without Fire Department approval. The agreement shall have provisions for emergency situations and the assessing of cost recovery to the property by the Fire District. 3. Reciprocal Water Covenant - Please provide a permanent maintenance and service covenant between the owners granting an irrevocable and non-exclusive easement, favoring the Fire District for the purpose of accessing and maintaining the private water mains, valves and fire hydrants (fire protection systems facilities in general). The covenant shall have provisions for emergency situations and the assessing of cost recovery to the property by the Fire District. I / FCS-15 Annexation of the Parcel Map: Annexation of the parcel map into the Community --- Facilities District#85-1 or#88-1 is required prior to the issuance of Grading or Building Permits. Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS - Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any Building Permits: • 1. Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District. Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District Standards. Approval of the on-site (private) fire underground and water plans is required prior to any Building Permit issuance for any structure on the site. Private on-site 17 D,E,F,G-305 Project No.DRC2013-00155 Completion Date combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD • Standards. The Building and Safety Services Department and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections. All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. Fire construction Services will inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 2. Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CVWD. On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the project. Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard. All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. CVWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing. Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CVWD. Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 3. Construction Access: The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard. All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14 feet, 6 inches above the finished surface of the road. 4. Fire Flow: A current fire flow letter from CVWD must be received. The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CVWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services. 5. Easements and Reciprocal Agreements: All easements and agreements must be recorded _I_I_ • with the County of San Bernardino. PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The building construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services' 'Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures." PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION - Please complete the following: 1. Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, 'Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers". On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location. 2. Private Fire Hydrants: For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on-site fire hydrants. The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for hiring the company to perform the test. A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available. The fire flow available must meet or exceed the required fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code. 3. Fire Sprinkler System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. • 4. Fire Sprinkler Monitoring: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire I_/ sprinkler monitoring system must be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. 18 D,E,F,G-306 Project No.DRC2013-00155 Completion Date • The fire sprinkler monitoring system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system (subject to the release of power). 5. Fire Suppression Systems and/or other special hazard protection systems shall be —/—/— inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services before occupancy is granted and/or equipment is placed in service. 6. Fire Alarm System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm —/—/— system shall be installed, inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. 7. Access Control Gates: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates —/—/— must be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards by Fire Construction Services. 8. Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire —/—/— access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services. The CCBR's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways. 9. Address: Must be in accordance with the RCFPD Standard 5-7, 5-8 and/or 5-5. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commercial/industrial and multi-family buildings • shall post the address in accordance to the appropriate RCFPD addressing Standard. 10. Hazardous Materials: The applicant must obtain inspection and acceptance by Fire —/—/— Construction Services. 11. Confidential Business Occupancy Information: The applicant shall complete the Rancho —/—/— Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form. This form provides contact information for Fire District use in the event of an emergency at the subject building or property. This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector. 12. Mapping Site Plan: Must be in accordance with the RCFPD Standard 5-11. Prior to the —/—/— issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a 8 '/2" x 11" or 11" x 17" Site Plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and building features as required in the standard. The Site Plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector. • 19 D,E,F,G-307 RESOLUTION NO. 13-48 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2013-00315, A REQUEST TO REMOVE TREES IN CONJUNCTION WITH A PROPOSAL TO CONSTRUCT TWO(2)INDUSTRIAL WAREHOUSE BUILDINGS OF 555,664 SQUARE FEET(BUILDING 1/PHASE 1)AND 1,033,565 SQUARE FEET(BUILDING 2/PHASE 2)ON A PROPERTY COMPRISED OF THREE (3) PARCELS WITH A COMBINED AREA OF 3,255,834 SQUARE FEET (74.7 ACRES) WHICH IS CURRENTLY DEVELOPED WITH A CONCRETE PIPE MANUFACTURING/STORAGE FACILITY (OPERATED BY AMERON INTERNATIONAL) IN THE HEAVY INDUSTRIAL(HI)DISTRICT LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ARROW ROUTE AND ETIWANDA AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF—APN: 0229-131-04, -17, AND-25. A. Recitals. 1. MIG/Hogle-Ireland, on behalf of Goodman Rancho SPE, LLC, filed an application for the approval of Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00315 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tree Removal Permit request is referred to as"the application." 2. On the 13th day of November 2013 the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. • 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW,THEREFORE, it is hereby found,determined,and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on November 13,2013, including written and oral staff reports,together with public testimony,this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a property located at the southwest comer of Etiwanda Avenue and Arrow Route; b. The property is comprised of five(5)parcels with a combined area of 3,255,834 square feet (74.7 acres) and street frontage along Arrow Route of about 2,600 feet and street frontage along Etiwanda Avenue of about 1,700 feet; C. The property is a concrete pipe manufacturing/storage facility operated by Ameron International, Inc. There are several buildings(of various size and purpose), outdoor equipment, areas for parking and storage, and associated infrastructure on the site. Most of the existing buildings are located at the north side of the site near Arrow Route. The southeastern part of the side is primarily used for the storage of finished concrete pipes. Paving on the site is generally limited to the parking areas and • the associated access driveways; D,E,F,G-308 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-48 TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2013-00315— MIG/HOGLE-IRELAND FOR GOODMAN RANCHO SPE, LLC November 13, 2013 • Page 2 d. To the west and south are manufacturing facilities operated by Tree Island Wire, Inc. and Gerdau, respectively. To the north are a chemical manufacturing facility operated by Air Liquide and a water storage facility operated by the Metropolitan Water District(MWD). To the east are several small commercial(e.g.ARCO and Tole-House Caf6)and industrial businesses. The Victoria Woods apartment complex is located northeast of the site at the northeast comer of Etiwanda Avenue and Arrow Route. e. The subject property and the properties to the west and south are zoned Heavy Industrial(HI)District while the properties to the east and north are zoned General Industrial(GI)District. The property at the northeast comer of Etiwanda Avenue and Arrow Route is zoned Medium (M) Residential, Etiwanda Specific Plan (South Overlay); and f. The applicant submitted an Arborist Report, prepared by Earthwise Arborists on April 23, 2013, that included description and health of the individual trees,their overall health and condition, and viability of relocation. The report stated that due to the location and/or health of the trees,none were suitable for relocation or protection in-place and recommended removal of the trees; and g. It is necessary to remove the trees in order to redevelop the site in two(2) phases by constructing two (2) industrial warehouse buildings of 555,664 square feet (Building 1/Phase 1) and 1,033,565 square feet(Building 2/Phase 2)with a combined floor area of 1,589,229 square feet; and h. Although the project area and the surrounding area is primarily industrial in character, there are a significant number of trees along the south side of Arrow Route to the west of the project site, along the north side of Arrow Route and directly across the street from the project site, and within the apartment complex at the northeast comer of the intersection of Etiwanda Avenue; and • i. Some of the trees along Arrow Route must be removed in order to widen and/or reconstruct the south side of the street and construct public improvements such as sidewalks; and j. The trees cannot be preserved by pruning and proper maintenance or by relocation rather than removal; and k. The trees do not constitute a significant natural resource of the City; and I. The trees are no required to be preserved by any Specific Plan, Community Plan, condition of approval, or designation as a Historic Landmark; and m. This application is in conjunction with Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19448, Development Review DRC2013-00155, and Uniform Sign Program DRC2013-00316. and 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and b. The proposed project is in accord with the objectives of the Municipal Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and C. The proposed project is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and • D,E,F,G-309 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-48 TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2013-00315— MIG/HOGLE-IRELAND FOR GOODMAN RANCHO SPE, LLC November 13, 2013 • Page 3 d. The proposed project, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health,safety orwelfare,or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 4. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19448 and Development Review DRC2013-00155 — the primary development projects with which this Tree Removal Permit is associated. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures related to air quality/greenhouse gases, hydrology/water quality,and noise there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination,a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation measures for the project. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below. Planning Department 1) Approval is for the removal of trees in conjunction with a proposal to construct two (2) industrial warehouse buildings of 555,664 square feet • (Building 1/Phase 1)and 1,033,565 square feet(Building 2/Phase 2)on a property comprised of three(3)parcels with a combined area of 3,255,834 square feet(74.7 acres)which is currently developed with a concrete pipe manufacturing/storage facility (operated by Ameron International) in the Heavy Industrial (HI) District located at the southwest comer of Arrow Route and Etiwanda Avenue; APN: 0229-131-04, -17, and -25. 2) All trees that are to be removed shall be replaced on a one-to-one basis with a tree of not less than 15 gallon size per Section 17.80.040— Tree Replacement Policy—of the City's Development Code. The replacement trees shall be shown on the Landscape and Irrigation Plans for Development Review DRC2013-00155. The species of each tree and the location where they are installed/planted shall be at the discretion of the applicant. 3) This permit shall be valid for a period of 90 days, unless an extension is requested in writing at least 14 days prior to the expiration date. Where this permit is associated with development, the effective date begins, and the 90 days shall start from the date of final map recordation or Building Permit issuance, whichever occurs first. 4) All Conditions of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19448 and Development Review DRC2013-00155 shall apply. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. • APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2013. D,E,F,G-310 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-48 TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2013-00315— MIG/HOGLE-IRELAND FOR GOODMAN RANCHO SPE, LLC November 13, 2013 • Page 4 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Frances Howdyshell, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary I,Candyce Burnett,Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of November 2013, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: • • D,E,F,G-311 RESOLUTION NO. 13-49 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM DRC2013-00316,A REQUEST TO ESTABLISH A UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM IN CONJUNCTION WITH A PROPOSAL TO CONSTRUCT TWO (2) INDUSTRIAL WAREHOUSE BUILDINGS OF 555,664 SQUARE FEET (BUILDING 1/PHASE 1)AND 1,033,565 SQUARE FEET(BUILDING 2/PHASE 2) ON A PROPERTY COMPRISED OF THREE (3) PARCELS WITH A COMBINED AREA OF 3,255,834 SQUARE FEET (74.7 ACRES) WHICH IS CURRENTLY DEVELOPED WITH A CONCRETE PIPE MANUFACTURING/STORAGE FACILITY (OPERATED BY AMERON INTERNATIONAL)IN THE HEAVY INDUSTRIAL(HI)DISTRICT LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ARROW ROUTE AND ETIWANDAAVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF—APN: 0229-131-04, -17, AND -25. A. Recitals. 1. MIG/Hogle-Ireland, on behalf of Goodman Rancho SPE, LLC, filed an application for the approval of Uniform Sign Program DRC2013-00316 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Uniform Sign Program request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 13th day of November 2013 the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. • 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW,THEREFORE,it is herebyfound,determined,and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,PartA, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on November 13,2013,including written and oral staff reports,together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a property located at the southwest comer of Etiwanda Avenue and Arrow Route; and b. The property is comprised of five(5)parcels with a combined area of 3,255,834 square feet (74.7 acres) and street frontage along Arrow Route of about 2,600 feet and street frontage along Etiwanda Avenue of about 1,700 feet; and C. The property is a concrete pipe manufacturing/storage facility operated by Ameron International, Inc. There are several buildings(of various size and purpose),outdoor equipment,areas for parking and storage, and associated infrastructure on the site. Most of the existing buildings are • located at the north side of the site near Arrow Route. The southeastern part of the side is primarily used for the storage of finished concrete pipes. Paving on the site is generally limited to the parking areas and the associated access driveways; and D,E,F,G-312 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-49 UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM DRC2013-00316— MIG/HOGLE-IRELAND FOR GOODMAN RANCHO SPE, LLC November 13, 2013 • Page 2 d. To the west and south are manufacturing facilities operated by Tree Island Wire, Inc. and Gerdau,respectively. To the north are a chemical manufacturing facility operated by Air Liquide and a water storage facility operated by the Metropolitan Water District(MWD). To the east are several small commercial(e.g.ARCO and Tole-House Cafe)and industrial businesses. The Victoria Woods apartment complex is located northeast of the site at the northeast comer of Etiwanda Avenue and Arrow Route;and e. The subject property and the properties to the west and south are zoned Heavy Industrial(HI)District while the properties to the east and north are zoned General Industrial(GI)District. The property at the northeast comer of Etiwanda Avenue and Arrow Route is zoned Medium (M) Residential, Etiwanda Specific Plan (South Overlay); and f. The applicant proposes a sign program comprised of a combination of monument and wall signs for the building addresses of each tenant space, tenant identification, and corporate ownership/management of the project site; and g. These signs are typical for industrial warehouse buildings; and h. The potential size, location, and placement of the signs will be integrated and compatible with the architecture of the buildings and the site; and i. This application is in conjunction with Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19448, Development Review DRC2013-00155, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00315. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the • above-referenced public hearing and upon the speck findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed Uniform Sign Program is consistent with the development standards for signs as provided in Chapter 17.74—Sign Regulations for Private Property; and b. The design,location,and scale of proposed signs forthe integrated development are in keeping with the architectural character of the development. 4. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19448 and Development Review DRC2013-00155 — the primary development projects with which this Uniform Sign Program is associated. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures related to air quality/greenhouse gases,hydrology/water quality,and noise there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination,a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation measures for the project. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below. • D,E,F,G-313 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 13-49 UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM DRC2013-00316— MIG/HOGLE-IRELAND FOR GOODMAN RANCHO SPE, LLC November 13, 2013 Page 3 Planning Department 1) Approval is forthe establishment of a Uniform Sign Program in conjunction with a proposal to construct two (2) industrial warehouse buildings of 555,664 square feet (Building 1/Phase 1) and 1,033,565 square feet (Building 2/Phase 2) on a property comprised of three (3) parcels with a combined area of 3,255,834 square feet (74.7 acres) which is currently developed with a concrete pipe manufacturing/storage facility(operated by Ameron International) in the Heavy Industrial (HI) District located at the southwest comer of Arrow Route and Etiwanda Avenue;APN: 0229-131- 04, -17, and -25. 2) The applicant shall submit a final draft of the Uniform Sign Program for the City's records prior to issuance of building permits. The final draft shall include all applicable technical corrections/revisions as described in the Design Review Committee's action/comments report for the Design Review Committee meeting held on September 17, 2013. All signs shall require review and approval of a separate Sign Permit application by the Planning Manager prior to installation. 3) All Conditions of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19448 and Development Review DRC2013-00155 shall apply. • 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2013. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Frances Howdyshell, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett,Secretaryof the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of November 2013, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: is ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: D,E,F,G-314 &ecamCZ eeP 11 MWDfS U METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Executive Office November 13, 2013 Via Electronic and Regular Mail Ms. Candyce Burnett City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Dear Mrs. Burnett: Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Goodman Logistics Center SUBTPM19448 and DRC2013-00155 The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California(Metropolitan)has reviewed the Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Goodman Logistics Center, Project File No. SUBTPMl9448 and DRC2013-00155. The proposed project consists of the construction of two industrial warehouse buildings of 555,664 square feet (Building 1/Phase 1) and 1,033,565 square feet (Building,2/Phase 2). The project would be located on a property comprised of three parcels zoned for Heavy Industrial, with a combined area of 3,255,834 square feet(74.7 acres). The proposed project site is currently developed with a concrete pipe manufacturing and storage facility operated by Ameron International. The project site is located at the southwest comer of Arrow Route and Etiwanda Avenue in Rancho Cucamonga, California. Metropolitan owns and operates the 144-inch-inside-diameter Etiwanda Pipeline,the 12-foot-by-l2-foot reinforced concrete box Etiwanda Emergency Discharge Pipeline, and the Etiwanda Control Facility in the immediate vicinity of the proposed project site. The Etiwanda Pipeline extends along the eastern boundary of the proposed project boundary in a-generally north to south direction and is located within a varied width(30- and 40- foot-wide)permanent easement. The Etiwanda Emergency Discharge Pipeline extends along the northern boundary of the proposed project site in a generally east to west direction and is located within a 50-foot-wide permanent easement. The Etiwanda Control Facility and appurtenant facilities are located just north of the proposed project site. The attached map shows 700 N.Alameda Street,Los Angeles,California 90012•Mailing Address:P.O.Box 54153,Los Angeles,California,90054-0153•Telephone:(213)217-6000 Mr. Guerin Page 2 November 13,2013 Metropolitan's facilities that are located immediately adjacent to the proposed project site. This letter contains Metropolitan's comments to the proposed project as a potentially affected public agency. Based on a review of the proposed project boundaries, the project has potential to impact Metropolitan's Etiwanda Pipeline, Etiwanda Emergency Discharge Pipeline and Etiwanda Control Facility. Metropolitan must be allowed to maintain its rights-of-way and requires unobstructed access to its facilities in order to maintain and repair its system. In order to avoid potential conflicts with Metropolitan's facilities and rights-of-way, we require that any design plans for any activity in the area of Metropolitan's pipelines or facilities be submitted for our review and written approval. Approval of the project should be contingent on Metropolitan's approval of design plans for portions of the proposed project that could impact its facilities. Detailed prints of drawings of Metropolitan's pipelines and rights-of-way may be obtained by calling Metropolitan's Substructures Information Line at(213)217-6564. To assist the applicant in preparing plans that are compatible with Metropolitan's facilities and easements, we have enclosed a copy of the"Guidelines for Developments in the Area of Facilities, Fee Properties, and/or Easement of The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California." Please note that all submitted designs or plans must clearly identify Metropolitan's facilities and rights-of-way. We appreciate the opportunity to provide input to your planning process and we look forward to receiving future documentation on this project. For further assistance, please contact Ms. Brenda Marines at(213) 217-7902. Very truly yours, Deirdre West Manager, Environmental Planning Team AR:BM:rdl (JAEnvironmrnlel Planning&Compliancc%Complead JobMovembtt 20131EPT Job No.2013111308) Enclosures: 1. Planning Guidelines 2. Map I_\n ! '�;•�'> `M'l ° ' 7z ®ry .eJ xt tom•!,! !'j frl n � , t - ♦ �tGtY` / ♦1/,� A- s't: �; 7 of "}' I `i ,�,�..,•C�n�.�¢>1.�>s'_�Qf�+`�"a*�� ��r� p �i7 � it $ �.. r. _ '� - \.11 4 �*�';_ '. - y_ � °,e rix•� , 0 4 c r �_,_ -{ `I . �s.„- I�if..l C7v._"�j } -'e RF [y(-�' �•N L, #,.� y�7f ��11 ! fit/:"'^<., ill Y"' •wKyr.-i �� rQ�f"•8rw Imo. � H: ( � ! jr�" •-a; x vr�.. ir(jq(.L i � � I'r �.�r �aO�a��'����fr�� +iiJ��• `�±'e_?� d t: h�7r`.1�, . fr h�r�'.a;���..oh,y{{Py \` (7/! �-s,+« Lz� yr SL''j�`� -n'r"o•��\� �� .tu•.� t: ! �•i�'+�ta .'•kyr� Jr .I/lJ ! Wr � �� !`�r-� S��. kCy . c S�r!-L \ •-��u G � � �'^l�,t�'( (`y �i�-3-r... -� r � � " �( �• lU � 'llr t v, 1; T 'T'.r_ .�� .1 l♦ Y�\ +q rh',� r,�(y�> �.• �+,,,.;r� 1 � r i �: j/ � ! �'- -'•t- r `7n 1 \+r'r .. `- ' �FI 'a:r ►. ^ i.v 1/ r!' .� cl e 1, . ' \f / v..eq a •��1aa�. ' +II ( i ^♦t �;I *'�,� �•.,,_ U`,yy A.s`' �"-, `�xy.. r � i mai\���;?{>ti.' (+/fit , l-}• ) +;� i -. .. f.Vii, r 17 �"..-•�l 4:.1{� d® ? f r'.,-.' C v� �r t 1! _ 1 n: . 1 y�” iRl r't (lr .'•'.'.'- � !` �-•. 1c ;a® s,=5.+ t. �f�.. , `i"'�...� -_„�,•-K»'r.'+ A� 'J[r J�i J ��/RjU'�4 >< ��1 '����ij'1 i(r• F�� � !�,-...--t" �,^^ 1 _r � � r�(fF) J r #'f• � �._ r^ ;�2�JjtvA.b�epue °; r �b r v•r 1 ! �. F! �. n.`,Y�� t �•� Irl �, ..A11J� {..I ��, �y � :� ;� r�;R,ri-•.��,, ����- r ,t,� ♦ : '�'�( � j {fir=; All Ir Al P 71 ,l f�.. 1 � f. 1(t � j� �S b• ��ill,.,.� f 4 �"1 �'.f I , r Guidelines for Developments in the Area of Facilities, Fee Properties, and or Easements of The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California 1. Introduction a. The following general guidelines should be followed for the design of proposed facilities and developments in the area of Metropolitan' s facilities , fee properties, and/or easements. b. We require that 3 copies of your tentative and final record maps, grading, paving, street improvement, landscape, storm drain, and utility plans be submitted for our review and written approval as they pertain to Metropolitan's facilities, fee properties and/or easements, prior to the commencement of any construction work. 2. Plans, Parcel and Tract Maps The following are Metropolitan's requirements for the identification of its facilities, fee properties, and/or easements on your plans, parcel maps and tract maps: a. Metropolitan's fee properties and/or easements and its pipelines and other facilities must be fully shown and identified as Metropolitan's on all applicable plans. b. Metropolitan's fee properties and/or easements must be shown and identified as Metropolitan' s with the official recording data on all applicable parcel and tract maps. C. Metropolitan's fee properties and/or easements and existing survey monuments must be dimensionally tied to the parcel or tract boundaries. d. Metropolitan' s records of surveys must be referenced on the parcel and tract maps. 2 _ 3. Maintenance of Access Along Metropolitan's Rights-of-Way a. Proposed cut or fill slopes exceeding 10 percent are normally not allowed within Metropolitan's fee properties or easements. This is required to facilitate the use of construction and maintenance equipment, and provide access to its aboveground and belowground facilities. b. We require that 16-foot-wide commercial-type driveway approaches be constructed on both sides of all streets crossing Metropolitan' s rights-of-way. Openings are required in any median island. Access ramps, if necessary, must be at least 16-feet-wide. Grades of ramps are normally not allowed to exceed 10 percent. If the slope of an access ramp must exceed 10 percent due to the topography, the ramp must be paved. We require a 40-foot-long level area on the driveway approach to access ramps where the ramp meets the street. At Metropolitan's fee properties, we may require fences and gates. C. The terms of Metropolitan' s permanent easement deeds normally preclude the building or maintenance of structures of any nature or kind within its easements, to ensure safety and avoid interference with operation and maintenance of Metropolitan's pipelines or other facilities. Metropolitan must have vehicular access along the easements at all times for inspection, patrolling, and for maintenance of the pipelines and other. facilities. on a routine basis. We require a 20-foot-wide clear zone around all above-ground facilities for this routine access. This clear zone should slope away from our facility on a grade not to exceed 2 percent. We must also have access along the easements with construction equipment. An example of this is shown on Figure 1. d. The footings of any proposed buildings adjacent to Metropolitan's fee properties and/or easements must not encroach into the fee property or easement or impose additional loading on Metropolitan's pipelines or other facilities therein. A typical situation is shown on Figure 2. Prints of the detail plans of the footings for any building or structure adjacent to the fee property or easement must be submitted for our review and written approval as they pertain to the pipeline or other facilities therein. Also, roof eaves of buildings adjacent to the easement or fee property must not overhang into the fee property or easement area. 3 - e. Metropolitan's pipelines and other facilities, e.g. structures, manholes, equipment, survey monuments, etc. within its fee properties and/or easements must be protected from damage by the easement holder on Metropolitan' s property or the property owner where Metropolitan has an easement, at no expense to Metropolitan. If the facility is a cathodic protection station it shall be located prior to any grading or excavation. The exact location, description and way of protection shall be shown on the related plans for the easement area. 4. Easements on Metropolitan's Property a. We encourage the use of Metropolitan' s fee rights- of-way by governmental agencies for public street and utility purposes, provided that such use does not interfere with Metropolitan's use of the property, the entire width of the property is accepted into the agency's public street system and fair market value is paid for such use of the right-of-way. b. Please contact the Director of Metropolitan's Right of Way and Land Division, telephone (213) 250-6302, concerning easements for landscaping, street, storm drain, sewer, water or other public facilities proposed within Metropolitan's fee properties. A map and legal description of the requested easements must be submitted. Also, written evidence must be submitted that shows the city or county will accept the easement• for the specific purposes into its public system. The grant of the easement will be subject to Metropolitan's rights to use its land for water pipelines and related purposes to the same extent as if such grant had not been made. There will be a charge for the easement. Please note that, if entry is required on the property prior to issuance of the easement, an entry permit must be obtained. There will also be a charge for the entry permit. S. Landscaping Metropolitan' s landscape guidelines for its fee properties and/or easements are as follows: a. A green belt may be allowed within Metropolitan's fee property or easement. b. All landscape plans shall show the location and size of Metropolitan's fee property and/or easement and the location and size of Metropolitan' s pipeline or other facilities therein. 4 _ C. Absolutely no trees will be allowed within 15 feet of the centerline of Metropolitan' s existing or future pipelines and facilities. d. Deep-rooted trees are prohibited within Metropolitan's fee properties and/or easements. Shallow- rooted trees are the only trees allowed. The shallow-rooted trees will not be permitted any closer than 15 feet from the centerline of the pipeline, and such trees shall not be taller than 25 feet with a root spread no greater than 20 feet in diameter at maturity. Shrubs, bushes, vines, and ground cover are permitted, but larger shrubs and bushes should not be planted directly over our pipeline. Turf is acceptable. We require submittal of landscape plans for Metropolitan' s prior review and written approval. (See Figure 3) . e. The landscape plans must contain provisions for Metropolitan' s vehicular access at all times along its ' rights-of-way to its pipelines or facilities therein. Gates capable of accepting Metropolitan's locks are required in any fences across its rights-of-way. Also, any walks or drainage facilities across its access route must be constructed to AASHTO H-20 loading standards. f. Rights to landscape any of Metropolitan's fee properties must be acquired from its Right of Way and Land Division. Appropriate entry permits must be obtained prior to any entry on its property. There will be a charge for any entry permit or easements required. 6. Fencing Metropolitan requires that perimeter fencing of its fee properties and facilities be constructed- of universal chain link, 6 feet in height and topped with 3 strands of barbed wire angled upward and outward at a 45 degree angle or an approved equal for a total fence height of 7 feet. Suitable substitute fencing may be considered by Metropolitan. (Please see Figure 5 for details) . 7. Utilities in Metropolitan's Fee Properties and/or Easements or Adjacent to Its Pipeline in AYR Streets Metropolitan' s policy for the alinement of utilities permitted within its fee properties and/or easements and street rights-of-way is as follows: a. Permanent structures, including catch basins, manholes, power poles, telephone riser boxes, etc. , shall not be located within its fee properties and/or easements. b. We request that permanent utility structures within public streets, in which Metropolitan's facilities are constructed under the Metropolitan Water District Act, be placed as far from our pipeline as possible, but not closer than 5 feet from the outside of our pipeline. C. The installation of utilities over or under Metropolitan's pipeline (s) must be in accordance with the requirements shown on the enclosed prints of Drawings Nos. C-11632 and C-9547. Whenever possible we request a minimum of one foot clearance between Metropolitan' s pipe and your facility. Temporary support of Metropolitan's pipe may also be required at undercrossings of its pipe in an open trench. The temporary support plans must be reviewed and approved by Metropolitan. d. Lateral utility crossings of Metropolitan' s pipelines must be as perpendicular to its pipeline alinement as practical. Prior to any excavation our pipeline shall be located manually and any excavation within two feet of our pipeline must be done by hand. This shall be noted on the appropriate drawings. e. Utilities constructed longitudinally within Metropolitan's rights-of-way must be located outside the theoretical trench prism- for uncovering its pipeline and must be located parallel to and as close to its rights- of-way lines as practical. f. When piping is jacked or installed in jacked casing or tunnel under Metropolitan's pipe, there must be at least two feet of vertical clearance between the bottom of Metropolitan's pipe and the top of the jacked pipe, jacked casing or tunnel. We also require that detail drawings of -the shoring for the jacking or tunneling pits be submitted for our review and approval. Provisions must be made to grout any voids around the exterior of the jacked pipe, jacked casing or tunnel. If the piping is installed in a jacked casing or tunnel the annular space between the piping and the jacked casing or tunnel must be filled with grout. g. Overhead electrical and telephone line requirements: 1) Conductor clearances are to conform to the California State Public Utilities Commission, General Order 95, for Overhead Electrical Line Construction or at a greater clearance if required by Metropolitan. Under no circumstances shall clearance be less than 35 feet. 2) A marker must be attached to the power pole showing the ground clearance and line voltage, to help prevent damage to your facilities during maintenance or other work being done in the area. 3) Line clearance over Metropolitan's fee properties and/or easements shall be shown on the drawing to indicate the lowest point of the line under the most adverse conditions including consideration of sag, wind load, temperature change, and support type. We require that overhead lines be located at least 30 feet laterally away from all above-ground structures on the pipelines. 4) When underground electrical conduits, 120 volts or greater, are installed within Metropolitan' s fee property and/or easement, the conduits must be incased in a minimum of three inches of red concrete. Where possible, above ground warning signs must also be placed at the right-of-way lines where the conduits enter and exit the right-of-way. h. The construction of sewerlines in Metropolitan's fee properties and/or easements must conform to the California Department of Health Services Criteria for the Separation of Water Mains and Sanitary Services and the local City or County Health Code Ordinance as it relates to installation of sewers in the vicinity of pressure waterlines. The construction of sewerlines .should also conform to these standards in street rights-of- way. i. Cross sections shall be provided for all pipeline crossings showing Metropolitan's fee property and/or easement limits and the location of our pipeline(s) . The exact locations of the crossing pipelines and their elevations shall be marked on as-built drawings for our information. 7 - j . Potholing of Metropolitan's pipeline is required if the vertical clearance between a utility and Metropolitan's pipeline is indicated on the plan to be 'one foot or less. If the indicated clearance is between one and two feet, potholing is suggested. Metropolitan will provide a representative to assists others in locating and identifying its pipeline. Two-working days notice is requested. k. Adequate shoring and bracing is required for the full depth of the trench when the excavation encroaches within the zone shown on Figure 4. 1. The location of utilities within Metropolitan's fee property and/or easement shall be plainly marked to help prevent damage during maintenance or other work done in the area. Detectable tape over buried utilities should be placed a minimum of 12 inches above the utility and shall conform to the following requirements: 1) Water pipeline: A two-inch blue warning tape shall be imprinted with: "CAUTION BURIED WATER PIPELINE" 2) Gas, oil, or chemical pipeline: A two-inch yellow warning tape shall be imprinted with: "CAUTION BURIED PIPELINE" 3) Sewer or storm drain pipeline: A two-inch green warning tape shall be imprinted with: "CAUTION BURIED PIPELINE" 4) Electric, street lighting, or traffic signals conduit: A two-inch red warning tape shall be imprinted with: "CAUTION BIIRIED CONDUIT" 5) Telephone, or television conduit: A two-inch orange warning tape shall be imprinted with: "CAUTION BIIRIED CONDUIT" 8 - M. Cathodic Protection requirements: 1) If there is a cathodic protection station for Metropolitan's pipeline in the area of the proposed work, it shall be located prior to any grading or excavation. The exact location, description and manner of protection shall be shown on all applicable plans. Please contact Metropolitan's Corrosion Engineering Section, located at Metropolitan' s F. E. Weymouth Softening and Filtration Plant, 700 North Moreno Avenue, La Verne, California 91750, telephone (714) 593-7474, for the locations of Metropolitan's cathodic protection stations. 2) If an induced-current cathodic protection system is to be installed on any pipeline crossing Metropolitan' s pipeline, please contact Mr. Wayne E. Risner at (714) 593-7474 or (213) 250-5085. He will review the proposed system and determine if any conflicts will arise with the existing cathodic protection systems installed by Metropolitan. 3) Within Metropolitan's rights-of-way, pipelines and carrier pipes (casings) shall be coated with an approved protective coating to conform to Metropolitan's requirements, and shall be maintained in a neat and orderly condition as directed by Metropolitan. The application and monitoring of cathodic protection on the pipeline and casing shall conform to Title 49 of the Code of Federal, Regulations, Part 195. 4) If a steel carrier pipe (casing) is used: (a) Cathodic protection shall be provided by use of a sacrificial magnesium anode (a sketch showing the cathodic protection details can be provided for the designers information) . (b) The steel carrier pipe shall be protected with a coal tar enamel coating inside and out in accordance with AWWA C203 specification. n. All trenches shall be excavated to comply with the CAI,/OSHA Construction Safety Orders, Article 6, beginning with Sections 1539 through 1547. Trench backfill shall be placed in 8-inch lifts and shall be compacted to 95 percent relative compaction (ASTM D698) across roadways and through protective dikes. Trench backfill elsewhere will be compacted to 90 percent relative compaction (ASTM D698) . 9 - o. Control cables connected with the operation of Metropolitan's system are buried within streets, its fee properties and/or easements. The locations and elevations of these cables shall be shown on the drawings. The drawings shall note that prior to any excavation in the area, the control cables shall be located and measures shall be taken by the contractor to protect the cables in place. p. Metropolitan is a member of Underground Service Alert (USA) . The contractor (excavator) shall contact USA at 1-800-422-4133 (Southern California) at least 48 hours prior to starting any excavation work. The contractor will be liable for any damage to Metropolitan's facilities as a result of the construction. 8. Paramount Right Facilities constructed within Metropolitan's fee properties and/or easements shall be subject to the paramount right of Metropolitan to use its fee properties and/or easements for the purpose for which they were acquired. If at any time Metropolitan or its assigns should, in the exercise of their rights, find it necessary to remove any of the facilities from the fee properties and/or easements, such removal and replacement shall be at the expense of the owner of the facility. 9. Modification of Metropolitan's Facilities When a manhole or other of Metropolitan's facilities must he modified to accommodate your construction or recons- truction, Metropolitan will modify the facilities with its forces. This should be noted on the construction plans. The estimated cost to perform this modification will be given to you and we will require a deposit for this amount before the work is performed. Once the deposit is received, we will schedule the work. Our forces will coordinate the work with your contractor. Our final billing will be basedon actual cost incurred, and will include materials, construction, engineering plan review, inspection, and administrative overhead charges calculated in accordance with Metropolitan's standard accounting practices. If the cost is less than the deposit, a refund will be made; however, if the cost exceeds the deposit, an invoice will be forwarded for payment of the additional amount. - 10 - 10. Drainage a. Residential or commercial development typically increases and concentrates the peak storm water runoff as well as the total yearly storm runoff from an area, thereby increasing the requirements for storm drain facilities downstream of the development. Also, throughout the year water from landscape irrigation, car washing, and other outdoor domestic water uses flows into the storm drainage system resulting in weed abatement, insect infestation, obstructed access and other problems. Therefore, it is Metropolitan's usual practice not to approve plans that show discharge of drainage from developments onto its fee properties and/or easements. b. If water must be carried across or discharged onto Metropolitan's fee properties and/or easements, Metropolitan will insist that plans for development provide that it be carried by closed conduit or lined open channel approved in writing by Metropolitan. Also the drainage facilities must be maintained by others, e.g. , city, county, homeowners association, etc. If the development proposes changes to existing drainage features, then the developer shall make provisions to provide for replacement and these changes must be approved by Metropolitan in writing. 11. Construction Coordination During construction-, Metropolitan's field representative will make periodic inspections. We request that a stipulation be added to the plans or specifications for notification of Mr. of Metropolitan's Operations Services Branch, telep one 213) 250- , at least two working days prior to any work in the vicinity of our facilities. 12. Pipeline Loading Restrictions a. Metropolitan's pipelines and conduits vary in structural strength, and some are not adequate for AASHTO H-20 loading. Therefore, specific loads over the specific sections of pipe or conduit must be reviewed and approved by Metropolitan. However, Metropolitan' s pipelines are typically adequate for AASHTO H-20 loading provided that the cover over the pipeline is not less than four feet or the cover is not substantially increased. If the temporary cover over the pipeline during construction is between three and four feet, equipment must restricted to that which imposes loads no greater than AASHTO H-10 . If the cover is between two and three feet, equipment must be restricted to that of a Caterpillar D-4 tract-type tractor. If the cover is less than two feet, only hand equipment may be used. Also, if the contractor plans to use any equipment over Metropolitan' s pipeline which will impose loads greater than AASHTO H-20, it will be necessary to submit the specifications of such equipment for our review and approval at least one week prior to its use. More restrictive requirements may apply to the loading guideline over the San Diego Pipelines 1 and 2, portions of the Orange County Feeder, and the Colorado River Aqueduct. Please contact us for loading restrictions on all of Metropolitan's pipelines and conduits. b. The existing cover over the pipeline shall be maintained unless Metropolitan determines that proposed changes do not pose a hazard to the integrity of the pipeline or an impediment to its maintenance. 13. Blasting a. At least 20 days prior to the start of any drilling for rock excavation blasting, or any blasting, in the vicinity of Metropolitan's facilities, a two-part preliminary conceptual plan shall be submitted to Metropolitan as follows: b. Part 1 of the conceptual plan shall include a complete summary of .proposed transportation, handling, storage, and use of explosions. C. Part 2 shall include the proposed general concept for blasting, including controlled blasting techniques and controls of .noise, fly rock, airblast, and ground vibration. 14. CEQA Requirements a. When Environmental Documents Have Not Been Prepared 1) Regulations implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) require that Metropolitan have an opportunity to consult with the agency or consultants preparing any environmental documentation. We are required to review and consider the environmental effects of the project as shown in the Negative Declaration or Environmental Impact Report (EIR) prepared for your project before committing Metropolitan to approve your request. 12 - 2) In order to ensure compliance with the regulations implementing CEQA where Metropolitan is not the Lead Agency, the following minimum procedures to ensure compliance with the Act have been established: a) Metropolitan shall be timely advised of any determination that a Categorical Exemption applies to the project. The Lead Agency is to advise Metropolitan that it and other agencies participating in the project have complied with the requirements of CEQA prior to Metropolitan's participation. b) Metropolitan is to be consulted during the preparation of the Negative Declaration or EIR. c) Metropolitan is to review and submit any necessary comments on the Negative Declaration or draft EIR. d) Metropolitan is to be indemnified for any costs or liability arising out of any violation of any laws or regulations including but not limited to the California Environmental Quality Act and its implementing regulations. b. When Environmental Documents Have Been Prepared If environmental documents have been prepared for your project, please furnish us a copy for our review and files in a timely manner so that we may have sufficient time to review and comment. The following steps must also be accomplished: - 1) The Lead Agency is to advise Metropolitan that it and other agencies participating in the project have complied with the requirements of CEQA prior to Metropolitan's, participation. 2) You must agree to indemnify Metropolitan, its officers, engineers, and agents for any costs or liability arising out of any violation of any laws or regulations including but not limited to the California Environmental Quality Act and its implementing regulations. 15. Metropolitan' s Plan-Review Cost a. An engineering review of your proposed facilities and developments and the preparation of a letter response giving Metropolitan ' s comments , requirements and/or approval that will require 8 man-hours or less of effort is typically performed at no cost to the developer, unless a facility must be modified where Metropolitan has superior rights. If an engineering review and letter response requires more than 8 man-hours of effort by Metropolitan to determine if the proposed facility or development is compatible with its facilities, or if modifications to Metropolitan ' s manhole (s) or other facilities will be required, then all of Metropolitan's costs associated with the project must be paid by the developer, unless the developer has superior rights. b. A deposit of funds will be required from the developer before Metropolitan can begin its detailed engineering plan review that will exceed 8 hours. The amount of the required deposit will be determined after a cursory review of the plans for the proposed development. C. Metropolitan's final billing will be based on actual cost incurred, and will include engineering plan review, inspection, materials, construction, and administrative overhead charges calculated in accordance with Metropolitan' s standard accounting practices. If the cost is less than the deposit, a refund will be made; however, if the cost exceeds the deposit, an invoice will be forwarded for payment of the additional amount. Additional deposits may be required if the cost of Metropolitan's review exceeds the amount of the initial deposit. 16. Caution We advise you that Metropolitan's plan reviews and responses are based upon information available to Metropolitan which was prepared by or on behalf of Metropolitan for general record purposes only. Such information may not be sufficiently detailed or accurate for your purposes. No warranty of any kind, either express or implied, is attached to the information therein conveyed as to its accuracy , and no inference should be drawn from Metropolitan' s failure to comment on any aspect of your project. You are therefore cautioned to make such surveys and other field investigations as you may deem prudent to assure yourself that any plans for your project are correct. 14 - 17 . Additional Information Should you require additional information, please contact: Civil Envineerina Substructures Section Metropolitan Water District of Southern California P.O. Box 54153 Los Angeles, California 90054-0153 (213) 217-6000 JEH/MRW/lk Rev. January 22; 1989 Encl. i s 3 1 9 . BACKHOE OR TRENCHER 1. � p -e--LAYING CRANE f r ek F ' .a• . 21'—d" NEEDED VOR TRENCHER Y�'.' r. ALSO DUMP TRUCK PARKING 1 MINIMUM WIDTH FOR \ i Al B�0"I.O, X 20'-0"LENGTH FULLY TIMBEREDWEIGHT 90,000 LBS. TRENCH 4 4, 1_ „ 2. WE MEJROPOUTAN WATER 013TRICT P'JWfNUn f1(MM14 6'-0" 28=0" REQUIRED CONSTRUCTION 44 0" WIDTHS en.wr. uu ertqv............._........ re.reo.............. rMrrta.............. fflmo.............................. FIGURE I mw re u•uee u.o r.o.ws,uusr ' A a i f i NO PERMANENT STRUCTURES PERM/TIED M.W.D. PERMANENT RIGHT OF WAY NO ROOF OVERHANG PERMITTED —+—r BUILD/NG FOOTING MUST NOT. ADJACENT ENCROACH INTO TO RIGHT RIGHT OF WAY OF WAY f/N/SHEJ SURFACE I �� tn I � • I Q 1 REOU/RED I I DEPTH Of FOOTING I I IO 45' 1 i _�►IP� _ TYPICAL 1 I M.W.D. PIPELINE I THE METROPOLITAN WATER WTR/CT REOUIREMENTS FOR NOTE. MWD. PIPELINE S/ZE,DEPTH,LOCAT/ON BUILDINGS AND FOOTINGS AND W/DTH OF PERMANENT RIGHT OF ADJACENT TD M.W.D. WAY VARIES. RIGHT OF WAY FIGURE 2 ea C Fi M.W.D. PERMANENT RIGHT OF WAY a NO DEEP NO TREES NO DEEP ROOTED TREES' ONLY APPROVED SHALLOW ROOTED TR££S ROOTING SHRUBS OR GRASSES 15, FIN/SHED SURFACE E MWD PIPE IHC MCTROPOamnLITAM ATE-DISTRICT d w uurom LANDSCAPE GUIDELINES FOR M.W.D. RIGHT OF WAY ......rrnwnum_........ nurro...... .......... FIGURE 3 a i j - STREET 8 I v •l.:� J1.RC-� 4�J TRENCH 0• 4 5�0 oQQ\Q�` 45° TYPICAL /�ADEOUATE SHORING AND BRACING \ REQUIRED FOR THE FULL DEPTH OF TRE METROPOLITAN WAMI?DISTRICT THE TRENCH WHEN THE EXCAVATION ENCROACHES WITHIN THIS ZONE SHORING AND BRACING REOUIREMENTS W,.............. ----------------... CWCO°............. ...................... FIGURE 4 ro•x we v o Knee u.o ne.xn a vnr —•_ .---- , SPECIFICATIONS NO. SHEET NO. I EL Srltrtl&A' lormcr Po. EX WALL END,CORNER.ANO P rypxxg atc—L954off Al gAl, nr AT,IWIr j" MrAq 6NwIv,NfrM/wvy 1. C- OA rvr L -T M WIN•e.QLA ELEVATION Ar SmAjtcmmwv r w Jr P., 7,— C." 'Wrow 'sramdew AN rr strwN w VATI'VerAl �mewN..exA.rY ON, C 0115H)) err/kw) fffff"L"rfs —oArr msr pa". 1;7 0'.14 41 fflw figArrorrAlL OF curour Q'rNry nm /N rq FOR CHAIN AND LOCK e.Nv 5'1=�ZZ�plll iM 0 Mg AITMOPO&IFAM WAYIN DISFRICF CHAIN itsly FENCE OMILS OWOLE SWING SArt OMIL FIGURE 5 e Dc a i � B . U..WD. Pipeline orf 0 axe"premolded ! -* ——--—--r exponsion Joint fillet 4 Dmin. E Apertures os, directed by,• ti a • ' the £nyineer,total volume �'•'4• not ro exceed 2 the volume ------- ,', of the supporting wall 1 Concrete support wall to be placed against undis- turbed ground I----Q----I SECT/ON "A-A" CROSS SECT/ON 1. Supporting wall shot/have a firm bearing on the subgrade and against the side of the excavation. 2. Premo/ded expansion Joint filler per ASTM D-1751-73 ?.. to be used in support for steel pipe only. i J. If trench width is 4 feet or greater,measured o/ong F I centerline of M.WD. pipe,concrete support must °' I be constructed. 4. /f french width is less than 4 feet,clean sand bock- fi/l,compacted to 90% density In accordance with the provisions of ASTM Standard D-/557-70 may :•' t.:'. be•used in lieu of the concrete support wall. SECT/ON "B-B" TNF mrmopaaurA wwA DI377t/CT TYPICAL SUPPORT FOR M.WD. PIPELINE G9547 O.3, DIRi4d.W/T Ct{.ww4wT 1030 a i Trench width .F a a a � 4 h 3"Preformed exponsion :::•.:; ;•: :: joint filler r� NOTES I. This method to be•used where the M.W.D. pipe utility line is 24"or greater in diameter and the clearance between the utility line and M.W.D. pipe is I2"or less. 2. Special protection may be required SECTION If the utility fine diameter is greater than M.W D. pipe or if the cover over the utility line to the street surface is minimal and there is 12"or less clearance betweenM.WO. I_ pipe and the Wilily line. ; J. Preformed expansion joint filler to comply with ASTM designation A D-/751-73• 4. M.W.D. requests 12"minimum clearance whenever possible. i 0.750 Excavation limits Sond bockfil/ Preformed expansion joint filler CROSS SECTION T)X MEnWMfnw WATER D477WT TYPICAL EXPANSION JOINT FILLER PROTECTION FOR OVERCROSSING OF M.W.O. PIPEL INE i ' C•//632 1.�1 ptt[�6•.I'M�ri.1.Wr-AMY O CALIFORNIA LEAGUE 1400 K Street, Suite 400 • Sacramento, California 95814 CITIES Phone: 916.658.8200 Fax: 916.658.8240 www.cacities.org 2014 LEAGUE STRATEGIC GOALS Meeting in joint session November 7 - 8, 2013 the officers and directors of the divisions, departments, diversity caucuses, policy committees and board of directors of the League of California Cities adopted the following strategic goals for 2014:1 1 1. Provide New Options for Infrastructure Investment and Economic Development. Advocate for new tools, authority and funding to enable increased investment in state and local infrastructure and economic development to support expanded job growth and economic opportunity for all Californians. 2. Expand Reform of Pension and Other Post-Employment Benefits (OPEB) Policies to Better Contain Long-Term Costs. Build on recent pension reforms and urge the adoption of additional measures to contain and manage the long-term growth of pension and OPEB costs, ensure the sustainability of these employee benefits, and protect the capacity of cities to adequately fund vital public safety and other community services. 3. Build Effective Partnerships to Help Respond to Growing Community Needs. Build effective partnerships with state and local officials and other organizations to promote local authority and funding sufficient to meet growing community needs. These strategic priorities are intended to encompass and supplement the resolutions adopted at the General Assembly at the League's 2013 Annual Conference concerning the important needs of cities in the area of water infrastructure and improved implementation of AB 109 public safety realignment. Ly� SIGN-IN SHEET s•g.. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING RANCHO NOVEMBER 13, 2013 CUCAMONGA AME '' ` COMPANY = . ` ADDRESS/EMAIL RlAlp N~7 1t!M1K Oa o�.�( Jf OW .k-54V•GoH- .