Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1996/05/15 - Minutes May 15, 1996 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Re(~ular Meetin~ A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, May 15, 1996, in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 7:26 p.m. by Mayor William J. Alexander. Present were Councilmembers: Paul Biane, James Curatalo, Rex Gutierrez, Diane Williams, and Mayor William J. Alexander. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Jerry B. Fulwood, Deputy City Manager; Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Manager; Rick Gomez, Community Development Director; Brad Buller, City Planner; Larry Henderson, Principal Planner; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Shintu Bose, Deputy City Engineer; Dave Blevins, Public Works Maintenance Manager; Cindy Hackett, Associate Engineer; Bob Zetterberg, Integrated Waste Coordinator; Bill Makshanoff, Building Official; Robert Dominguez, Administrative Services Director; Susan Stark, Finance Officer; Ingrid Blair, GIS Supervisor; Jim Frost, City Treasurer; Diane O'Neal, Management Analyst II; Chief Dennis Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS B1. Presentation of a Proclamation Declaring the Week of May 19 through May 25, 1996 as National Public Works Week. Mayor Alexander presented the Proclamation to Dave Blevins, Public Works Maintenance Manager. Dave Blevins thanked the Council and the maintenance workers who work so hard for the residents of the City to make this a better place to live. B2. Presentation to the Award Winners of Waste Prevention Week Essay and Coloring Contest. Mayor Alexander and Bob Zetterberg, Integrated Waste Coordinator, presented the awards to the students. Co COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC No communications were made from the public. City Council Minutes May 15, 1996 Page 2 D. CONSENT CALENDAR Jack Lam, City Manger, stated that with regard to Item D14 there was a clarification that the contract was being awarded to Calfon Construction Incorporated per the memorandum distributed this evening. D1. Approval of Minutes: March 20, 1996 April 17, 1996 D2. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 4/24/96 and 5/1/96; and Payroll ending 4/18/96 for the total amount of $1,608,441.03. D3. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of April 30, 1996. D4. Alcoholic Beverage Application for On-Sale Beer and Wine for Burgers 4-U, Louis Williams, Jr., 10707 Town Center Drive, Suite 110. D5. Alcoholic Beverage Application for On-Sale Beer and Wine for A Chen's Restaurant, Chuan Chuan Chang and Weibin Chen, 9799 D Base Line Road. D6. Approval to amend Fiscal Year 1995/96 Appropriations. D7. Approval of the Environmental Initial Study, Parts I and II for the proposed Metrolink Corridor BeautificatJon Project at locations along the Metrolink Corridor between Archibald Avenue and Milliken Avenue, and issuance of a Categorical Exemption therefore. RESOLUTION NO. 96-065 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL STUDY AND ISSUANCE OF A CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION FOR THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA METROLINK CORRIDOR BEAUTIFICATION PROJECT BETWEEN ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND MILLIKEN AVENUE D8. Approval of Landmark Designation 96-01 - SANBAG - A request to designate an existing residence and accessory structures (Sam and Alfreda Maloof residence and workshop - National Register eligible), located at 9553 Highland Avenue - APN: 202-101-18. Related files: Landmark Alteration Permit 96-01, Conditional Use Permit 96-09, and Design Review 96-03. RESOLUTION NO. 96-066 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING HISTORIC LANDMARK 96-01, TO DESIGNATE THE MALOOF RESIDENCE AND WORKSHOPS, LOCATED AT 9553 HIGHLAND AVENUE, AS A LANDMARK, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 202-101-18 D9. Approval to execute a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement for DR 95-08, located at 5550 Crooked Creek Drive, APN: 1074-171-21, submitted by Thomas Aaron Gifford and Jodi Ann Gifford. City Council Minutes May 15, 1996 Page 3 RESOLUTION NO. 96-067 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM THOMAS AARON GIFFORD AND JODI ANN GIFFORD AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND THE CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME D10. Approval to execute Program Supplement Nos. 012,013, 014, 015, 016,017 and 019 (CO 96-017, 96-018, 96-019, 96-020, 96-021,96-022 and 96-023) to Local Agency-State Master Agreement No. SLTPP- 5420 for the State-Local Transportation Partnership Program between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the State of California for the improvement of portions of Base Line Road, Fourth Street, Hermosa Avenue, Milliken Avenue, Hellman Avenue and Jersey Boulevard. Reimbursable Funding from the Supplement Agreement shall be deposited to the SB140 Account. RESOLUTION NO. 96-068 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND SIGNING OF PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT NOS. 012, 013, 014, 015, 016,017 AND 019 TO LOCAL AGENCY-STATE MASTER AGREEMENT NO. SLTPP-5420 FOR THE STATE- LOCAL TRANSPORTATION PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF PORTIONS OF BASE LINE ROAD, FOURTH STREET, HERMOSA AVENUE, MILLIKEN AVENUE, HELLMAN AVENUE AND JERSEY BOULEVARD D11. Approval to execute an Agreement (CO 96-024) with San Bernardino County Foodbank to continue to serve as a distribution site for U.S.D.A. commodities. D12. Approval to execute a Professional Services Agreement (CO 96-025) with Austin-Foust Associates for updalJng of the City Traffic Model and Transportation Fee Schedule. Project to be funded from Account Nos. 32-4637-9109 and 09-4637-8780 for $30,000.00. D13. Approval to execute a Cooperative Agreement (CO 96-026) between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and San Bernardino County Transportation Authority for the funding of the Haven Avenue Street and Storm Drain Improvement Project from Deer Creek Channel to Base Line Road, and authorizing the Mayor to sign same. RESOLUTION NO. 96-069 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND EXECUTING THE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (SANBAG) FOR THE FUNDING OF THE DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, AND CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION FOR THE HAVEN AVENUE STREET AND STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FROM DEER CREEK CHANNEL TO BASE LINE ROAD D14. Approval to award and authorization for execution of contract (CO 96-027) for Haven Avenue Storm Drain and Street Improvements, from Deer Creek Channel to Base Line Road, to be funded from SB140 Funds Account No. 35-4637-9027 and Measure I Funds Account Nos. 32-4637-9027 and 32-4637-9537. City Council Minutes May 15, 1996 Page 4 D15. Approval to award and authorization for execution of contract (CO 96-028) for the Replacement of Cobblestone Curb along the east side of Etiwanda Avenue, to Camino In/ine Company, in the amount of $48,970.57 (44,581.70 plus 10% contingency) to be funded from Beautification Funds Account No. 21-4647- 8822. D16. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance Distdct No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance Distdct Nos. I and 6 for CUP 95-15, located on the north side of Arrow Route, east of Rochester Avenue, submitted by Howard D. Chastain. RESOLUTION NO. 96-070 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL 'OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR CUP 95-15 RESOLUTION NO. 96-071 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 8 FOR CUP 95-15 D17. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance Distdct No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. I and 6 for CUP 95-19, located at 11167 White Birch Place, east of Elm Avenue, submitted by Regis Contractors, L.P. RESOLUTION NO. 96-072 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR CUP 95-19 RESOLUTION NO. 96-073 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR CUP 95-19 D18. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 13759, located on the west side of Haven Avenue south of Victoria Street, submitted by Fu Mai Limited. RESOLUTION NO. 96-074 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13759 D19. Approval to Release Bonds and Notice of Completion for CUP 93-13, located on the east side of Hermosa Avenue, south of Eighth Street. Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $ 88,000.00 No. 172602S City Council Minutes May 15, 1996 Page 5 RESOLUTION NO. 96-075 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR CUP 93-13 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Curatalo to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports contained in the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. No items were submitted. E. CONSENT ORDINANCES F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS Fl. CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 95-16 - SACRED HEART CHURCH - Appeal of the Planning Commission's approval of the bell schedule for a proposed church and school facility in the Very Low Residential designation (1-2 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue, between Summit and Highland Avenues - APN: 225-171-12, 20, 22 and 23. Staff report presented by Brad Buller, City Planner. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council were: Mike Cockrell stated he is one of the few residents that was notified for the January 24, 1996 Planning Commission meeting. He stated he did not feel it was noticed properly. He stated he had conducted a survey that was presented at the Planning Commission workshop. He continued to state he had moved here because of the quiet he was expecting to have in the Etiwanda area. He asked that the Council find that this facility is not in the best interest of the City and that the bells are not allowed as per the Etiwanda Specific Plan. James Markman, City Attorney, clarified that both of the appeals are about the bell schedule only. Jim Frost, 12996 Victoria Avenue, stated he was part of the Etiwanda Specific Plan Advisory Committee, and that Etiwanda is not the sleepy community it once was. He stated he felt the Planning Commission did a good job in reaching a compromise. He asked for the Council to accept the Planning Commission's decision. Father Gaglia, Pastor of Sacred Heart Church, stated the residents near the church and the Village of Heritage are appealing the restricted use of the bells for the church. He talked about the compromises they agreed to make to be within the City's noise ordinance. He asked that the Council accept their proposal. He stated that page 55 of the Eftwanda Specific Plan does state there will be churches and schools for this area. He asked for those to stand that support their proposal. (The appropriate audience stood.) He asked that the Council approve their appeal as so submitted. City Council Minutes May 15, 1996 Page 6 Doug Peterson, 6771 Blue Gum, stated had he known when he bought his house that they were going to have a bell tower so close to him, he never would have bought it. He stated he did not agree with the bell schedule. He asked that those that live within one quarter mile of the proposed church to stand. (The appropriate audience stood.) He asked that the Planning Commission be given direction to go back and eliminate all of the bells. Larry Matejka stated he filed the appeal and that he did not feel the residents were notified properly. He felt the bell schedule was unreasonable to be dnging as much as they have been approved to ring. He felt the Council was going to have to mitigate this issue. David Berger, Sr., stated they have been members of the Sacred Heart Church for some years now and felt the bells must continue to ring. Shelly Cockrell, resident of Eliwanda for three and a half years, stated she has a problem with the bells because she is Jewish and does not want to listen to bells for another religion. She pointed out that St. Peter and St. Paul does not ring bells. She did not feel this should be allowed so that she is a prisoner in her own house. She stated she is also concerned about the traffic. Cathy Bazaki stated she felt the bells have always been a tradition in the neighborhood. She stated there is a lot of traffic already in this area from the schools. She stated she is a wedding coordinator for the Sacred Heart Church and is concerned about all of the horns honking from the wedding. Rick Andonigas stated just because the bells are a tradition for Catholics, it is not a tradition for everyone else. He stated people that mow their lawns are not allowed to do this late at night and did not think the bells should be allowed. Gina Johnson quoted Justice Black of the Supreme Court. She told about the compromises the church is willing to make with the bell ringing. She felt if they are within the boundaries of the Ordinance, what is the purpose of stopping them from ringing. Barbara Foot stated she would like to hear the bells. She stated she lives in Etiwanda and deserves the right to hear the bells. JoAnn Hunt stated she does not want to have to hear the bells and did not feel she should have to be a prisoner of her own home. She felt this would disturb the quiet in her neighborhood. She also was concerned about the traffic. Don Delugas stated he was notified of the first hearing. He felt the noticing was not done properly. He felt it should go back to the Planning Commission. James Markman, City Attorney, stated every City has a 300 foot noticing requirement. He agreed this did not reach a lot of people because of the lot sizes in this area. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated the site was also posted and notices were mailed. He stated there was a traffic analysis done also. He felt the Planning Commission should have gotten more input from the local residents. Jeanene Tibbits, Shasta Drive, stated because of the position of the church on the lot and the bell tower, and because people are running their air conditioning units most of the time and with grandfather clocks chiming, she did not think people would really hear the bells that much. She really did not think the traffic would be that much of a problem. City Council Minutes May 15, 1996 Page 7 Cecilia Fink stated she did not think the bells should be ringing each day. She felt special occasions and on Sunday was acceptable. She felt her rights will be taken away from her and that she would be trapped in her own house. She felt no one took her opinion into consideration, and felt people would not have any peace and quiet. Tammy Ness and Christina Braden (students) felt someone was going to have to be unhappy no matter what the decision. They felt everyone needed to compromise. Brenda Glasco of Etiwanda stated she does not want to hear the bells after she has commuted four hours each day. She did notwantto have to hear them ringing every hour. She also commented that she did not receive any notification on this matter. Casey Woodbury, Cherokee, felt the bells dnging all of the time was not good and that it would disrupt her family. Becky Fosten stated she liked to hear the bells ringing. Larry Lucasic, Cherokee Road, felt there was a safety issue near the church because of the traffic. He felt there needed to be a compromise for the bell ringing. John Baker, student, stated he did not feel there was really an issue if the church was within the law. Ed Baginero stated he is a fireman and gets called out at the fire station by bells. He stated he did not think he would want to have to hear this at home also because he would be thinking he was supposed to go to work. Mark Edder, Cherokee, stated nobody is here to punish the church. He did not think the bells should be allowed to ring every 15 minutes. Berry Samboll, Blue Gum Court, stated nobody is against the church, but only something they believe in. He did not think the neighbors should be disturbed by the bells and felt their privacy should be respected. AI Tibbits, Shasta Drive, stated he was not notified about this issue. He felt the sound from the bells should be put into context with all of the other noises of the neighborhood. There being no further response, the public hearing was closed. Councilmember Curatalo felt this group was definitely divided and the City was in the middle. He stated this was well debated, but that he agreed with the Planning Commission's compromise. Councilmember Biane stated this was an emotional issue. He stated he would not have a problem with hearing the bells ring every 15 minutes. He stated the Planning Commission has worked very hard to get this compromise and that he would agree with the Planning Commission's decision. Councilmember Gutierrez stated there is a lot of noise in this area that people complain about. He stated he finds the bells now ringing at the church across from the Price Club very peaceful. He felt with the property being posted that people in the area knew about the church going in. He stated if he votes no, it is because he does not feel it is right to do any regulating of the bells. He stated if he votes yes, the bells will be ringing. He felt the Planning Commission's decision was valid, but that he does agree with Commissioner Melcher and did not think the Council should decide how to regulate the bells. Councilmember Williams asked if the bell schedule was part of the CUP. City Council Minutes May 15, 1996 Page 8 Brad Buller, City Planner, stated yes. Councilmember Williams asked if this is a problem in the future, can it be brought back. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated that any condition can be evaluated if there is a problem. Councilmember Williams stated she has a problem with the 6:00 a.m. start for the ringing of the bells. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated that can be changed if the Council would like it to. James Markman, City Attorney, stated this can be checked like any other use, that it is not considered a freedom of religion issue. He pointed out that the check can also be used for a possible modification of the CUP. Mayor Alexander stated he agreed with Councilmember Gutierrez if this is really an issue for the Council to be considering. He stated he did not feel there is a way to make everyone happy on this. He stated he would like to see it brought back for review in six months after the church is built for an evaluation. He felt notification boundaries should be extended to between 600 and 800 feet. Councilmember GulJerrez stated he is disappointed to hear people criticizing a religion which is different from what they believe in. He stated he is making his decision with respect for this church and any other church. RESOLUTION NO. 96-076 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE BELL SCHEDULE FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 95-16, A CHURCH AND SCHOOL FACILITY, IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATION (1-2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, BETWEEN SUMMIT AND HIGHLAND AVENUES, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 225-171-12, 20, 22 AND 23 MOTION: Moved by Curatalo, seconded by Alexander to accept the Planning Commission's decision and to return the matter to the Council for review in six months after the church is completed. Motion carried 3-2 (Williams and Gutierrez no). A recess was taken at 9:27 p.m. The Council reconvened at 9:45 p.m. with all Councilmembers present. F2. CONSIDERATION OF CONDITION USE PERMIT 96-04 - FRANCIS BALCHAK - An appeal of the Planning Commission's denial of a request to establish a 1,075 square foot video arcade and a 2,207 square foot pool room in conjunction with a 2,100 square foot restaurant within the Neighborhood Commercial (NC) shopping center located at the southwest corner of Hellman Avenue and Base Line Road - APN: 208-202-17. {TO BE CONTINUED TO JUNE $, 1996) Brad Buller, City Planner, stated there is a request to continue this item to June 5, 1996. MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Williams to continue Item F2 to June 5, 1996. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. City Council Minutes May 15, 1996 Page 9 F3. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 15732 - LEWIS HOMES - Appeal of a condition of approval regarding school facility financing for a proposed subdivision of 33 single family homes on 9.46 acres of land in the Community Service designation, located at the northwest corner of Base Line Road and Etiwanda Avenue - APN: 277-522-05, 07, and 08. (TO BE CONTINUED TO JUNE 5, 1996) MOTOIN: Moved by Gutierrez, seconded by Biane to continue Item F3 to June 5, 1996. Motion carded unanimously, 5-0. F4. CONSIDERATION OF THE FINAL DRAFT ANNUAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDING ALLOCATIONS FOR FY 1996-97 - The review of the Federally required Annual Action Plan for Fiscal Year 1996/97, including the final selection of projects for the Community Development Block Grant annual application, based on an estimate of $1,024,000 (current year's allocation). Staff report presented by Larry Henderson, Principal Planner. Councilmember Gutierrez stated he felt this was a good start to begin this program. Councilmember Biane thanked Larry Henderson for his work on this project and thought this was a good program. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council was: Nacho Gracia, of Northtown Housing Development Corporation, thanked the Council and the Ad Hoc Task Force for their work on this. Steve Baer, 7599 Cerrito Rojo, thanked the Council and Task Force for considering their project. There being no further response, the public hearing was closed. MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Biane to approve the final draft annual Community Development Block Grant Funding Allocations for Fiscal Year 1996/97. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. ITEMS FS, F6, AND F7 WERE CONSIDERED AT THE SAME TIME. F5. CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT AND RESOLUTION FOR THE LEVY OF THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN THE PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT ('PD-85) FOR FISCAL YEAR 1996/97. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE IS PROPOSED Staff report presented by Joe O'Neil, City Engineer. Jack Lam, City Manager, pointed out that the City is very proud of the program for the installation of the water sensor devices. He stated over the years it has shown to produce quite a bit of savings while yet providing the adequate amount of water for the parkways. He stated the City is in the last phases of installation for this program. He stated it has really helped stabilize the Districts and that this is the fourth year which these Districts have not been increased. He reported that they are at the "A" level of service. He brought to the Council's attention that several years ago they had gone down to a much lower level of service. He stated the City Council Minutes May 15, 1996 Page 10 rates have stabilized as of four years ago. He stated with the Jarvis initiative that will be on the ballot in November, who knows what challenges this will produce in regards to being able to keep up with growth in the future as far as maintenance in the Districts. He stated this will be a future challenge. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. Councilmember VVilliams asked if we could check into retrofitting the mowed turf area so there is not such a high maintenance cost. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, stated they are currently working on something for Haven Avenue. He stated it is not only labor intensive, but uses a lot of water. Councilmember Gutierrez stated he is happy with the Engineering staff for all of their hard work. RESOLUTION NO. 96-077 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN THE PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. PD-85 (HERITAGE AND RED HILL COMMUNITY PARKS) MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Gutierrez to approve Resolution No. 96-077. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. F6. CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT AND RESOLUTION FOR THE LEVY OF THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1.2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 FOR FISCAL YEAR 1996/97. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE IS PROPOSED SEE ITEM F5 FOR DISCUSSION. RESOLUTION NO. 96-078 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Gutierrez to approve Resolution No. 96-078. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. F7. CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT AND RESOLUTION FOR THE LEVY OF THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4.5, 6, 7 AND 8 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1997/97. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE IS PROPOSED SEE ITEM F5 FOR DISCUSSION. City Council Minutes May 15, 1996 Page 11 RESOLUTION NO. 96-079 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPE AND STREET LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Gutierrez to approve Resolution No. 96-079. Motion carded unanimously, 5-0. No items were submitted. G. PUBLIC HEARINGS H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS H1. DISCUSSION OF SKATEBOARDING CONSIDERATIONS AS PRESENTED BY THE PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION Staff report presented by Suzanne Ota, Community Services Manager. Mark Whitehead, Chairman of the Park and Recreation Commission, stated they have done a lot of work on this. He talked about the other skateboard parks they have checked out in other cities. He stated the City Council was given information from the City of Santa Rosa about their skateboard park. He stated they would like to continue working on this matter by possibly setting up a Task Force to involve the community on developing this project. Bruce Ann Hahn, Park and Recreation Commissioner, stated she thought Temecula has a video on their skateboard park. She stated at the CPRS Conference in San Diego she went to a session on fund raising. She stated she went to Active, a store in the Terra Vista Town Center, where they sell all types of skateboard equipment. She stated she learned by talking with the owner of this store that the manufacturers of all of this equipment will sponsor a skater. The owner also told her he thought the manufacturers might be a good source of fund raising for a skateboard park. He said they were very excited about the possibility of a skateboard park. Councilmember Biane thanked the Park and Recreation Commission for their work on this. He realized they had done a lot of work. Councilmember Gutierrez asked if Marcus Solomon had been contacted. Bruce Ann Hahn, Commissioner, stated he was the one that suggested that funds be sought out from the crime bill. Councilmember Williams felt they also needed a hockey rink to be included in this project. ACTION: Park and Recreation Commission to continue pursuing this matter. City Council Minutes May 15, 1996 Page 12 H2. UPDATE FROM ROUTE 30 AD HOC TASK FORCE Engineer. ACTION: Report received and filed. No items were submitted. J1. Staff report presented by Joe O'Neil, City I. COUNCIL BUSINESS J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING Councilmember Williams stated she would like clarification on the notification requirements for public hearing items. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated he would provide this information in a memo to the Council. K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC No communications were made from the public. L. ADJOURNMENT MOTOIN: Moved by Gutierrez, seconded by Williams to adjourn to an Executive Session to discuss Labor Negotiations per Government Code Section 54957.6 to give Robert Dominguez, Administrative Services Director, diredon in regards to the Meet and Confer Process. Executive Session will adjourn to a Joint Meeting with the Planning Commission to be held Wednesday, May 29, 1996, 6:30 p.m. in the Tri-Communities Conference Room atthe Civic Center. Motion carded unanimously, 5-0. The meeting adjourned at 10:21 p.m. No action was taken in Executive Session. R7~jctfully submitted, 'C'~bra J. Adarrt~, CMC City Clerk Approved: June 19, 1996