The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1986/05/21 - MinutesMay 21, 1986 CITY OF RANCBO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Regular Meeting A. C&TJ. TO ORD~m A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga met on Wednesday, May 21, 1986, in the Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga. The meeting was called to orderat 7:35 p.m. by Mayor Jeffrey King. Present were Councilmembers: Charles J. Buquet II, Richard M. Dahl, Pamela J. Wright, and Mayor Jeffrey King. Also present were: City Manager, Lauren M. Wasserman; City Clerk, Beverly A. Authelet; City Attorney, James Markman; Assistant City Manager, Robert Rizzo; Community Development Director, Jack Lam; City Planner, Brad Bullet; City Engineer, Lloyd Hubbs; Community Services Director, Bill Holley; Administrative Services Director, Jim Hart; Administrative Analyst, Mark Lorimer; Sr. Planner, Otto Kroutil; and St. Planner, Dan Coleman. Absent: Councilmember Jon MikeIs B. AmNOU!ICRMmaTS/PitI~qmaTATX(iMS El. Thursday, May 22, 1986 - 7:30 p.m. - ADVISORY COMMISSION - Lions Park Commenity Center, 9161 Base Line Road. B2. Wednesday, May 28, 1986 - 7:00 p.m. - PLANNING COMMISSION - Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road. B3. Presentation of a Proclamation declaring May Business Week in the City of Rancho Cucamenga. 19 - 23, 1986, as Small C. CrasSaRT Cl. Approval of Warrants, Register No's. 5-21-86 and Payroll ending 1-9-B6 and 5-1-86 for the total amount of $903,950.73. C2. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of May 14, 1986. C3. Receive Claim (CL 86-22) against the City by Susan Elizabeth Lawson for personal injuries near the corner of Base Line and Vineyard. (0704-06 CLAIM) C4. Receive Claim (CL 86-23) against the City by Brian J. and Lisa Lessard for an automobile accident at the intersection of Base Line and Spruce. (0704-06 CLAIM) C5. Receive Claim (CL 86-24) against the City by Dwight D. Martin personal property damages at 7583 Archibald. (0704-06 CLAIM) C6. Receive Claim (CL 86-25) against the City by Joey Ray Alice for injuries at the intersection of Campus and 19th Street. (0704-06) personal C7. Approval to purchase traffic signal controllers for 1985-86 traffic signal construction program for $35,509.50 from Traconex, Inc., the low bidder. (0601-01 BID & 1162-02 TRAFFIC SIGNAL) C8. Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion. (0602-01 BOND RELEASE & 0704-18 NOT COMPLT) (~) (2) (3) (4) 5) 6) 7) 8) City Council Minutes May 21, 1986 Page 2 (9) (~o) (~2) TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY - LEHIS EOMES Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bonds Tr. 12316, 12317, 12364, (Medians, Parkways, Interior Planting & Local Street Trees) Tr. 12315-1, 12317-1, 12364-1 (Medians, Parkway & Trails) Tr. 12364-1 (Street Improvement and Landscaping Tr. 12316-1 (Street Improvement and Landscaping $36,000.00 Tr. 12317-1 (Street Improvement and Medians) $18,400.00 $ 9,000.00 $11,600.00' $17,470.00 Release: Faithful Performonce Bonds Tr. 12316, 12317, 12364 (Medians, Parkways, Interior Planting & Local Street Trees) Tr. 12316-1, 12317-1, 12364-1 (Medians and Trails) Tr. 12364-1 (Street Improvement and Landscaping) Tr. 12316-1 (Street Improvement and Landscaping) Tr. 12317-1 (Street Improvement and Medians) $ 90,000.00 $116,000.00 $174,700.00 $360,000.00 $159,500.00 M. J. BROCK AND SOBS - TRACTS 11173 AND 11173-1 (LOCATED AT CORNER OF 19TH STREET AND ARCHXBALD AVm~VE) THE SOUTHFAST Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Tr. 11173) Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Tr. 11173-1) $15,000.00 $22,500.00 C9. Approval to release T.O.P. Bonds in the amount of $2,500 for Tract 12090, USA Properties, Inc. for Sales Office located at Archibald and Feron. (0602-O1 BOND RELEASE) C10. Approval of Lien Agreement between the Foothill Communities Church of the Nazarene and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for street frontage improvements at 9944 Highland Avenue. (0602-01 AGREE LIB~) RESOLUTION NO. 86-142 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOBGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A LIRN AGREENRNT FROM THE FOOTHILL COMMUNITIES CHURCH OF THE NAZARBXqE AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYORAND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME Cll. Approval of Resolution establishing fees in lieu of undergrounding utilities required by Planning Commission approval. Councilman D-hi pulled item. (0401-12 FEES) RESOLUTION NO. 86-143 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TEE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOBCA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING FEES IN LIEU OF UNDERGROUNDING OVERHEAD UTILITY LINES WH~lq Rff~UIRED BY PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL C12. Approval of Parcel Map 7441 located on the north side of Lomita Drive, 321 feet west of Amethyst Avenue, submitted by Donald Tackerr. (1002-09 MAP PARCEL) City Council Minutes May 21, 1986 Page 3 RESOLOTIOB NO. 86-144 A RESOLUTI08 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP 7441 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 7441) C13. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, and Improvement Security for Tract 13027, located on the southwest corner of HiEbland and Etiwanda Avenues, submitted by The Hilliam Lyon Company. Item teeeyed - to coeeback at s later tim, (1002-09 MAP FINAL & 0602-01 AGREE IMPR) RESOLUTION NO. 86-145 A RESOLUTION OF TEE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREENEST, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT 13027 C14. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreements and Improvement Security for Tract (]5) 12832 located on the north side of Victoria Park Lane and the west side of (]6) Victoria Hindrows Loops, submitted by the William Lyon Company. (1002-09 MAP FINAL & 0602-01 AGREE IMPR) RESOLUTION NO. 86-1415 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREENNqTS, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES, AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT 12832 C15. Approval of intention to annex Tract 12833 into Street Lighting District #1, as annexation No. 15, and Street Lighting District ~3 as annexation No. 1. (1002-09 ST LIGHT 141)) RESOLUTION NO. 86-147 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCNO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY BNGINEER'S REPORT FORANNEXATION NO. IS TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 86-148 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTESANCE DISTRICT NO. I, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION NO. 15 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTION THERETO RESOLUTION NO. 86-149 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENCINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION NO. I TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 RESOLUTION NO. 8~ -150 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RABCHO CUCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTESTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATION NO. 1 TO STREET LIGETING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO, 3; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LICHTINC ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR NEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO C16. Approval to accept "Street Or Highway Easement" (CO 86-049) Southern Pacific Transportation Company for the Archibald Avenue Crossing (No. BBO-522.90) widening nortb of Base Line Road. (0602-01 & 1002-02 EASEMENT) from the Railroad CONTRACT City Council Minutes May 21, 1986 Page 4 (2o) (22) (23) (24) (26) (27) (28) RESOLUTION NO. 86-1 51 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPR0VING AND ACCEPTING THE GRANT OF EASEN~IqT BETWE~ THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION CONPANY AND THE CITY OF RABCHO CUCANONGA FOR THE ARCHIBALD AVENUE RAILROAD CROSSING (NO. BBO-522.90) WIDENING NORTH OF BASE LIB E ROAD C17. Approval to seek bids for the construction of the Archibald Avenue Sidewalks, from Foothill to Base Line and to fund this project from TDA Article 3 and Archibald Beautification Funds. Item tessowed - to come back at a later time. (0602-O1 BID) RESOLUTION NO. 86-152 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "ARCHIBALD AV~ltUE SID~ALKS, FROM FOOTRILL TO BASE LINE", IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING TEE CITY CLEI~ TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS C18. Approval to seek bids for Base Line Sidewalk Improvement, north side from 600 feet east to 1300 feet east of Hermosa Avenue. (0601-01 BID) RESOLUTION NO. 86-153 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RABCHO CUCANONGA, CALIFOENIA, APPROVINC PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE BASE LINE SIDEWALK IMPROVENENT, IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTIS E TO RECEIVE BIDS C19. Approval of amendment to 1985-86 [busing Repair/Rehabilitation Loan with San Bernardino County (CO 85-256), (0602-01 CONTRACT) C20. Approval of agreement (CO 86-053) with the West Valley Vector Control District for services in the amount of $37,000.00. Councilmen Dabl pulled item. (0602-01 CONTRACT) C21. Approval of acquisition of an IBM Personal Computer/AT (Advanced Technology) system, enhanced color graphics subsystem and software for Assessment district management reporting and teleprocessing access to County Assessor and T~x Collector databases. Total cost not to exceed $8,800.00. (0606-01 E~UIP L/P) C22. Approval of Park and Recreation Improvement District (Heritage and Red Hill Community Park) (CO 86-054) ordering the preparation of the required Eogineer's Report, approving Report of Engineer, declaring its intention to provide for an annual levy and collection of assessments in a special assessment district and setting time and place for public hearing for June 4, 19~. (0602-01 CONTRACT & 0~d)1-03 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT) RESOLUTION NO. ~-154 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, INITIATING PROCEEDINGS FOR THEANNUAL LEVY OF ASSESSMENTS AND ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF AN ~IQGINEER'S "REPORT" FOR A SPECIAL ASSESSMRNT DISTRICT RESOLUTION NO. 86-155 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE [IQGINBER'S "REPORT" FOR PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT RESOLUTION NO. 86-137 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO PROVIDE FOR AN ANNUAL LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMUTS IN A SPECIAL ASSESSMUT DISTRICT ABD SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR PUBLIC HFARING THEREON ~y Council Mluu=es May 21, 1986 Page 5 C23. Approval to grant sanitary se~er easement to CCWD to allow California Retirement Villas service their property located in the northwest corner of Red Hill Community Park. (1002-02 EASEMElqT) C24. Approval park located (1404-05 PARK) of the conceptual park design for the six acre plus neighborhood in Victoria Groves phase of the Victoria Planned Community. C25. Approval of Resolution supporting the 1986 State Park Bond Act (Proposition 43). Councilman Dabl pulled item. (0704-00 LEGAL) RESOLUTIQq NO. 86-156 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF I~CHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING PROPOSITION 43 WHICH PLACES BEFORE THE VOTERS OF CALIFORNIA, JUNE 3, 1986, A BOND MEASURE TO PROVIDE FUNDING FOR PARKS AND RECREATIONAL LAND ACQUISITION, DEVELOPMENT AND OTHER RELATED PURPOSES C26. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for Tract 13066 located on the south side of 19tb Street, east of Amethyst, submitted by Hill Willjams Development. (0602-01 AGREE IMPR & 1002-09 MAP FINAL) Faithful Performance Bond: $306,000.00 Labor and Material Bond: $153,000.00 RESOLUTION NO. 86-122 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMRNT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT NO. 13066 C27. Set public bearing for June 4, 1986, for approval of Annual Engineer's Report and to levy and collect assessments for Landscape Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5. (0401-03 LANDSCAPE MD) RESOLUTION NO. 86-140 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TNE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENCINEER'S ANNUAL REPORT FOR LANDSCAPE MAINT[BANCE DISTRICT NO. I , LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 , LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3, LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4, AND LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 5 RESOLUTION NO. 86-139 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IL~CHO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INT~IqTIUN TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSN~I~TS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I , LANDSCAPE MAIleT[NANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 , LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3, I.*,BDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4, AND L/~DSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 5 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1986-87 PURSUANT TO TRE L~DSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO C28. Set public hearing for June 4, 1986 for approval of Annual Engineer's Report and to levy and collect assessments for Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4. (0401-03 ST LIGHT MD) RESOLUTION NO. 86-141 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CIT'/OF RAIqCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORT POR STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I, STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2, STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 , AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 (30) City Council Minutes May 21, 1986 Page 6 (37) (38) (39) (40) (41) RESOLUTION NO. 86-138 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1, STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2, STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3, STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4, FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1986-87 PURSUANT TO TEE LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARINC OBJECTIONS THERETO C29. Set public hearing for June 4, 1986 - Appeal of Planning Commission decision - Environmental Assessment and Tentative Tract 12902 - Woodland Pacific. (0701-06 APPEAL) C30. Set public hearing for June 4, 1986 - Environmental Assessment and Development Code Amendment 86-01. (0203-05 DC AMENDMENT) C31. Set June 4, 1986 - Appeal of Planning Commission (non-advertised) decision - Environmental Assessment and Development Review 85-53 - Anderson. (0701-06 APPEAL) C32. Set June 4, 1986 - Appeal of Planning Commission (non-advertised) decision - Environmental Assessment and Development Revie~ 85-22 - Edwards Cinema. (0701-06 APPEAL) ' MOTION: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Wright to approve Consent Calendar minus Items 11, 13, 17, 20 and 25. Motion carried 4-0-1 (Mikels absent)· Discussion of Item Cll. Approval of Resolution establishing fees in lieu of undergrounding utilities required by Planning Commission approval. Councilmsn Dahl asked if this allowed for other methods of funding, or is it just by the in lieu fee. Mr. Hubbs responded stating establish that fee. There and etc. that where an in lieu fee was allowed, this would are other methods of obtaining fees such as bonding Councilman Dahl stated that answered his question. MOTION: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Wright to approve item and Resolution No. 86-143. Motion carried 4-0-1 (Mikels absent). RESOLUTION NO. 86-143 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISNINC FEES IN LIEU OF UNDERGROGNDING OVERHEAD UTILITY LINES WHEN REQUIRED BY PLANNING CONNISSION APPROVAL Discussion of Item C20. Approval of agreement with the West Valley Vector Control District for services in the amount of $37,000.00. Councilman Dahl said that be decided to have a report on this since there were several different agreements in front of them. Mark Lorimer, Administrative Analyst, stated that a revised copy of an agreement bad been given to Council tonight. There are still several changes to be added to that which are as follows: On page 3 of the contract, item #9, the following sentence should be added: "Response by District shall not account for more than 10Z of the District's man hours necessary to provide services herein." Pa~e 7 On page 4, section 3, the eeqQence should read: "City shall hold harmless District from any and all claims or court action of whatsoever kind or nature for damage to property or personal injury, including death, which may arise from any act carried on pursuant to paragraph B and parUraoh C (should be added) of ..... etc." Councilman Buquet pointed out that this was an eighteen (18) month contract at $36,720 per year. We would have to add the cost of an additional six (6) months to that contract for a total cost. When the City Attorney was asked if there were any additional problems, Mr. Markman responded that the problems which were in the packet bave,J been resolved. Bowever, be stated that Councilwoman Wright bad asked a question concerning section 8 regarding the fees, fines and liens that were collected by the District. She questioned why they vanted to retain the fines and etc. wben the City was paying for the service. Cene Zdunowski, Consultant, stated that this was a requirement under the California Health and Safety Code would go into effect in the absence of an ordinance adopted by the City. He bad submitted a numbe~ ef~ord~nanCe~ to the City and bad suggested the City adopt such an ordinance. Included in these were the enforcing codes. A representative from West Valley Vector Control resp~nded~that in-the past eleven (11) years, they bad collected very little in fees. He did not feel the Board would object to deleting section 8 from the contrac~ [iitch Bernstein from the County was present and stated he was willing to answer any of Council's questions ..... Council followed up by asking questions regarding the price of the contract, what would be included in those services, and what would be included with the supplemental contract for rodent control versus what we were presently receiving. After much discussion regarding sectica~e,~f the Vector Control:Contract, the City Attorney recommended the following language be added as the last sentence of that section: "Any such amount retained by the District shall be deducted from any fees otherwisa owing the District from the City". [iOTIOB: [loved by Wright, seconded by Buquet, to approve the contract with the West Valley Vector Control District for services in the amount of $37,000.00. [iotlon carried ~-0-1. (Mikels absent). Discussion of Item C25. Approval of Resolution supporting t'be 1986 ~tate Park Bond Act (Proposition 43). Councilman Dabl stated he simply wanted to remove this ~o tbm ti.~e~ld be read to emphasize this item. He read the title of Resolution No. 86-156. RKSOLHTIOB NO. 86-156 :, .... A RESOLUTIOB OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RABCHO CUCA~OBGA, CALIFOBBIA, SUPPORTING PROPOSITIOB 43 WHICH PLACES BEFORE TaB VOTERS OF CALIFORI~IA, JUNE 3, 1986, A BOBD [IFASUR2 TO PROVIDE FUNDING FOR PARKS AND RECREATIUNAL LAND ACQUISITIO8, DEVELOP[iSleT AND OTH~ RELATED PURPOSES MOTlOB: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Dahl, to approve Resolution No. 86-156. [lotion carried ~-0-1. (MikeIs absent). City Council Minutes May 21, 1986 Page 8 (42) (43) D. CO(J~CTT- BUS'I'81~S DI. MINIMUM LOT SIZES FOR SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED AND ZERO LOT LINE HOUSIN{ (DA~). - It is suggested that all single family detached and zero lot line developments have at least a 6000 sq. ft. minimum size. (0203-03 DEVEL CODE) Councilman Dahl presented a report stating that the added requirements he was recommending would only increase the price of the home approximately $2,400. Mayor King stated that at the last meeting, they had discussed unit sizes, and tonight they were discussing lot sizes. We had decided at the last meeting to have the B.I.A. get with staff for their input. He felt this item should also go to the B.I.A. for their input. Councilman Dahl stated that it was his idea that this would require an ordinance and would need to be forwarded to the Planning Commission for public hearing. Councilwoman Wright stated she did not believe we should sit down with the B.I.A. We already know what the developers want. Councilman Buquet felt staff should investigate this, bring the item back so Council could make a policy and then direct it back to the Planning Commission for public hearings. Mr. Bullet, City Planner, stated that they needed more time than the two (2) weeks in order to do this. Councilman Dahl suggested that we could defer this to the CAC for community input. MOTION: Moved by Dab1, seconded by Wright, to refer this to the CAC and staff, with staff reporting their findings at the first meeting in July. Motion failed because of a tie vote: AYES: Dahl, Wright NOES: Buquet, King ABSENT: MikeIs After much discussion, Mayor King directed staff to refer to the Planning Commission and to bring the item back to Council the first meeting in August under non-advertised public hearings. Council concurred. D2. PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS TO MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS - Council will consider modifications of development standards to bring apartments to condominium standards. The Council will also consider minimum dwelling sizes for all residential units, and modifications of parking standards to include garages. Staff report by Otto Kroutil, St. Planner. (0203-03 DEVEL CODE) Councilmun Dahl stated that after the last meeting, he thought about Councilwoman Wright's suggestion on garages and felt that the utilization of garages on the basis of square footage was a good plan. As far as law enforcement, he had contacted the San Bernardino Sheriff's Department and discovered it actually was a deterrent to crime. MOTION: Moved by Wright, seconded by Dahl, to refer the issue of apartment and condominium standards and garages to the Planning Commission for public hearing. Motion carried 4-0-1. (Mikels absent). Mayor King asked about the minimum dwelling sizes. Mr. Kroutil responded that it was their understanding they were to draft a report after they had talked with the B.I.A. He stated we have talked by phone, but have not had an opportunity to actually sit down with the B.I,A. to discuss in greater detail and write up a written report. Mr. Bullet stated that he had bad a phone conversation with Tom Kohl of the B.I.A. Mr. Kohl did not have any problems with the basics of what we were talking about, but we have not had the time to sit down and talk in detail. May 21, 1986 Page 9 Mayor King responded the issue of lot sizes and unit sizes were inter-related, and if there were no objections by the Council, this could be included with the former issue and brought back with the lot size issue on August 1. MOTION: Moved by Wright, seconded by Dahl, to bring the matter back August 1. Motion carried 4-0-1. (MikeIs absent). Councilwoman Wright explained that she was not in favor of delaying this. She felt we should discuss this and make a decision now. She felt the only option to get this item moving was to make a motion, so she did. D3. CONSIDEBATION OF APPOINTMFRTS TO TSE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AD HOC COMMITTEE. (0701-01 COMMITTEE) Mr. Bullet, City Planner, stated that Mr. Kelbe~ would not be able to make evening meetings and asked to be deleted from the list. The following is a list the Subcommittee came up with from the names Council submitted: Lynn Cross, John Nolt and Gary Mitchell MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Dabl, to approve the above names. Motion carried 4-0-1. (Mikels absent). It was announced that the first meeting was tentatively scheduled for May 27, 1986. Mayor King called a recess at 9:lSp.m. The meeting reconvened at 9:25 p.m., with all members of Council present except Councilman Mikels. Mayor King announced that those who wish to place items on the agenda under Council Business should announce their intent at the previous meeting. Mayor King announced he wanted added to the next meeting's agenda "Timing and Method of Planning Commission Appointment, and Library Services within the City of Rancho Cucamonga". Councilman Buquet stated that he wanted the CAC also included. Councilman Dahl stated that we should include all Commissions in this discussion. E. AnVl~'mTXftn PUBLIC gnu'rmGS El. ADDITION OF C~P, PTER 8.18 TO THE RANCBO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE CONCERNING (45) COMMERCTAL AND INDUSTRIAL REFUSE COLLECTION - Establishing of performance standards and criteria for commarcial and industrial refuse collection permit. Staff report by Robert Rizzo, Assistant City Manager. (1170-04 REFUSE) Mayor King opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. City Clerk Authelet read the title of Ordinance No. 291. ORDINANCE N0. 291 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF TEE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCRO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADDING CHAPTER 8.18 TO TEE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE CONCERNING COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL REFUSE COLLECTION MOTION: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Buquet, to waive full reading of Ordinance No. 291 and adopt. Motion carried 4-0-1. (Mikels absent). City Council Minutes May 21, 1986 Page 10 (46) (47) ~.!CI-AI~TKB~ZSIm IIKARTICS F1. ENTERTAINMENT ORDINANCE DI~INING PERMIT PROCEDURES FOR BUSINESSES DESIRIN( TO OFFER LIVE FaqTERTAINMFNT WITHIN THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAHOBGA. Staff report by James Markman, City Attorney. (0203-05 ADULT BUSINESS) Mr. Markman stated his office has received a number of calls from some who felt the Ordinance was targeting a certain business. He stated that this was not the case. This Ordinance can be found in 95% of tbe cities in California. It is totally incorrect for anyone to believe that their particular business would be denied a licensing Permit on the basis of this ordinance. Mayor King opened the meeting for public bearing. Addressing Council were: Bob Casaletti, Poker Palace in Etiwanda. the small businessman out of business. He felt that Counc.il Was texing Mayor King responded that this wasn't a revenue raising method, but was regulatory in nature. The fee would simply be to cover the cost of expenses for processing the permit. Jim Frost, City Treasurer, stated he did not see this as serving the purpose for which it was intended. He did not feel the Ordinance accomplished any goal. There being no further public response, Mayor King closed the public hearing. City Clerk Authelet read the title of Ordinance No. 290. ORDINANCE NO. 290 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA AMDqDING TITLE 5 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMO~GA MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING A ND4 CHAPTER 5.12 EI~TITLRD *'REGULATION OF ENTERTAINMENT" MOTION: Moved by Wright, seconded by Dahl, to waive full reading of Ordinance No. 290. Motion carried 4-0-1. (Mikels absent). MOTION: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Buquet, to adopt Ordinance No. 290. carried 4-0-1. (Mikels absent). Motion F2. AMF~DM~T TO ORDINANCE NO. 30 DgLETING REOUIREMENT FOR COLLECTION OF SB 201 FEES. Staff report by Jack Lam, Community Development Director. (0401-12 FEES) Mr. Lam stated the Ordinance would simplI delete the fees, although the SB 201 Ordinance would still remain on the books. Mayor King opened the meeting for public bearing. Addressing Council was: Bob Salazar, B.I.A, expressed the City Council should be the body people come to for justifying their fees. The City Attorney stated that since the Candid case, the cities can't control what the school districts and developers work out. There being no further response, the public hearing was closed. City Clerk Authelet read the title of Ordinance No. 30B ORDINAliCE NO. 30~'(first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY ~F' RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 8 OF ITS ORDINANCE NO. 30, AS HERETOFORE AMENDED, PERTAINING TO THE FINANCING OF INTERIM SCHOOL FACILITIES MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Dahl, to waive full reading of Ordinance No. 30B. Motion carried 4-0-1. (Mikels absent). City ~v~.~ May 21~ i986 Page 11 MOTION: Mayor King set second reading for June 4, 1986. G. CTTT NAEAGIB'S SI'A!~I RK!~OBI~ GI. RANCHO CUCANONGA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION REPORT - Status of the non-profit Community Foundation to be created for the benefit of cultural services and other community enhancement projects. Staff report by Mark Lorimer, Administrative Analyst. (0701-01 COMMISSION) The meeting was turned over to John Francis, Attorney, who will be working to set up the Foundation. The meeting was opened for public input. Addressing Council was Jim Barton. Mr. Barton cautioned Council that the selection of people was very important. He suggested that Council set up separate foundations for each project; one for the Cultural Center, one for the Library, etc. Mr. Francis responded that it was true that the selection of the people would be very important. As to whether there should be one foundation or several, he felt it was difficult to find five (5) people, but to find more of the quality you would want would be impossible. He did not advise forming more than one {1) foundation until you had one project well under way. Addressing Council was Myrna Patrick who asked questions regarding the community foundation. There being no further public input, the public hearing was closed. MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Wright, to approve the documents and direct staff and Mr. Francis to proceed with incorporation of the foundation. Motion carried 4-0-1. (Mikels absent). Mayor King directed staff discussion of the selection Center. to place on the next agenda under Council Business process for the Board of Directors of the Cultural C2. SET BUDGET WOPXSHOP DATES. (0205-01 BUDGET) MOTION: Moved by King, seconded by Dahl to set Thursday, May 29, 7:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m., Thursday, June 5, 6:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m., with adoption for June 18. Motion carried 4-0-1. (Mikels absent). G3. CULTURAL CFIqTER REPORT. Staff report by Lauren Wasserman, City Manager. (0~02-01 CULT ONTR) Mayor King opened the meeting for public input. Addressing Council was: Jim Frost, City Treasurer, pointed out there was one additional item to be included in the list, and that was the Charley Garcia House. Jim Barton, Barton Development, stated the Task Force was weighted heavily on the Library side in his opinion, and the report came back that way. He felt that we were lacking libraries, but where we were lacking them was at the grade school level. Diane Williams, Task Force Member, did not feel the committee was weighted on the library side because at the first meeting, she was the only one who mentioned the need for libraries. She also expressed that no school could afford the necessary library material. We needed to have a public library. After some discussion by City Council, the report was received and filed. City Council Minutes May 21, 1986 Page 12 R. Cfwee~,~Slrm BUSYm~S NONE SUBMITTED Xo A11-T(X]12mMIUr[ MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Dahl, to adjourn regarding property negotiations, not to reconvene. (Mikels absent). The meeting adjourned at 10:50 p.m. to a closed session Motion carried 4-0-1. Respectfully submitted Beverly A. Autbelet City Clerk Approved: June 18, 1986