Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984/10/29 - Minutes - AdjournedOctober 29, 1984 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Adiourned Meetin~ An adjourned meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga met on Monday, October 29, 1984, in the Library Conference Room, 9191 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga. The meeting was called to order at 6:40 p.m. by Mayor Jon D. Mikels. Present were Councilmembers: Pamela J. Wright, Richard M. Dahl, Jeffcry King, and Mayor Jon D. Mikels. Also present were: City Manager, Lauren M. Wasserman; City Clerk, Beverly A. Authelet; Assistant to City Manager, Robert Rizzo; Community Development Director, Jack Lam; Finance Director, Harry Empey; Community Services Director, Bill Molley. Absent: Councilmember Charles J. Buquet II (who arrived late at 7:10 p.m.). 2A. CLASSIFICATION AND COMPENSATION STUDY. The City Council will discuss the comprehensive personnel classification and compensation study prepared by Halph Andersen & Associates. Staff report presented by Lauren M. Waseerman, City Manager. The meeting was turned over to John Shannon, from Ralph Andersen & Associates, who made a formal presentation to the Council. He went over the three specific areas which they considered: To bring the classification plan up to date; Conduct a compensation survey; and Develop compensation recommendations for administration pay practices He then went over the process of formulating the Plan. Council adjourned to a Closed Session at 6:50 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 8:55 p.m. Mayor MikeIs stated they had gone over the Plan with the Consultant and had come to a conclusion. City Clerk Authelet read the title of Resolution No. 84-272. RESOLUTION NO. 84-272 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 84-190 AND RESOLUTION NO. 190A RELATING TO SALARY RANGES AND BENEFITS FOR ALL FULL TIME AND PART TIME EMPLOYEES OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FOR FISCAL YEAR 1984-85 MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by King to adopt Resolution No. 84-272 with the provisions for Executive Management not exceed the control point step until further review by the City Council, and to waive full reading of Resolution No. 84-272. Mayor Mikeis stated the intent of the motion was to review compensation for management personnel beyond control point. Councilman Buquet stated he was not convinced that the Executive Management should be treated across the board as everyone else. He wanted to review and maintain flexibility, not put this off indefinitely, but to resolve this shortly. Mr. Wasserman went over some corrections to the Resolution. Council had copies of the corrections before them. (~) City Council Minutes October 29, 1984 Page 2 (2) (3) (4) Previous motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Wright, Buquet, Mikels, King NOES: Dahl Councilman Dahl stated he felt the Resolution has some points not explained at the Executive Management level; and without supporting data, he could not support the Resolution. Councilman Buquet felt the other Resolution (not n,-.bered) should be dealt with since it had been presented at the last meeting and was part of the whole program. Councilman King stated he had some basic problems with Subsection A in each category. Mayor MikeIs felt he would like to look at this further and to defer to a later meeting to discuss. He felt the action taken by Council has recognized the concept. Mr. Shannon, consultant, responded that Resolution No. 84-272 defines the levels of classification, but this is the Resolution which spells out those classifications. Councilman Buquet felt the benefits could be reworked, but Council should proceed with the concept. MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Wright to approve the concept of the three management categories, direct staff to bring item back in November to discuss the benefit compensations. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. Mayor Mikels stated at one of the next two meetings in November, the Council would meet in a Closed Session to discuss this. ADDED ITEM: SETTING DATE FOR COUNCIL WORKSHOP. Councilman King stated he would like Council to set a time to get together to discuss how to improve the Council. Mr. Wasserman informed the Council that he had just received a letter from a consultant that is working with the City with a program for Council. After some discussion, the following motion was made: MOTION: Moved by King, seconded by Dahl to set Saturday, December 8, 1984 for a Council workshop. Place to be announced. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. ADDED ITEM: RETAIN ATTORNEY TO APPEAL LAFCO DECISION. Mayor Mikels stated Council needed to approve retaining Wynn Furth, Attorney from the law firm of Allen, Shelton & O'Connor, for the appeal of LAFCO's decision of the negative declaration. MOTION: Moved by King, seconded by Dahl to approve retaining Wynn Furth from Allen, Shelton & O'Connor to represent the City in appealing the negative declaration. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. City Council Minutes October 29, 1984 Page 3 MOTION: Moved by Dahl, carried unanimously 5-0. ADJOURNHENT seconded by Buquet to adjourn the meeting. The meeting adjourned at 9:20 p.m. [~espectful ly submitted, Beverly A. Authelet City Clerk Motion