Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984/09/05 - Minutes September 5, 1984 CITY OF RANClIO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Regular Meetin2 1. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga met on Hednesday, September 5, 1984, in the Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road. The meeting was called to order at 7:35 p.m. by Mayor Jon D. Mikels. Present were Councilmembers: Pamela J. Hright, Charles J. Buquet II, Richard M. Dahl, Jeffsty King, and Mayor Jon D. Mikels. Also present were: City Manager, Lauren M. Wasserman; City Attorney, Robert Dougherty; City Clerk, Beverly A. Authelet; Community Development Director, Jack Lam; City Planner, Rick Gomez; Senior Civil Engineer, Paul Rougeau; Bill Rolley, Community Services Director; and Mark Lorimer, Administrative Analyst. Approval of Minutes: MOTION: Moved by King, seconded by Buquet to approve the minutes as amended. (The votes on August 14th minutes should be 4-0-1 -- Buquet absent). Motion carried unanimously 5-0. 2. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS 2A. Thursday, September 6, 1984, 7:00 p.m. - HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION, Lions Park Community Center. 2B. Hednesday, September 12, 1984, 7:00 p.m. - PLANNING COMMISSION HEETING, Lions Park Community Center. 2C. Applications are being accepted for Advisory Commission through September 27, 1984: Potential of seven commission positions available--three in Alta Loma, two in Cucamonga, and two in Etiwanda. 2D. Presentation of Five Year Service Awards to: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner, and Jim Mendez, member of the CAC. 3. CONSENT CALENDA~ Councilman King requested Items M and N removed for discussion. 3A. Approval of Warrants, Register No's. 84-09-05 and Payroll ending 8/19/84 for the total amount of $610,140.53. 3B. Alcoholic Beverage Application No. AB 84-21 for On-Sale Beer & Wine Eating Place License, Linda S. & Robert B. Hermes, 8798 19th Street. 3C. Alcoholic Beverage Application No. AB 84-22 for Off-Sale Beer & Hine Eating Place License, Jasminderjit & Manjest Grewal, 6075 Archibald Avenue. 3D. Release of Bonds: 9833 Highland Avenue - Single Family House; owner, Joe & Maria Dias. Faithful Performance Bond (road) $5,000.00 City Council Minutes September 5, 1984 Page 2 RESOLUTION NO. 84-230 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCliO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR 9833 HIGHLAND AVENUE AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORN 3E. Approval of acceptance of the Improvements of Bear Gulch Place, Arrov Route and Arrow Park Grading (20-4532-8005). Accept: Maintenance Bond $ 8,749.00 Release: Faithful Performance Bond $87,490.50 RESOLUTION NO. 84-231 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING TNE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR IMPROVEMENTS OF BEAR GULCH PLACE, ARROW ROUTE AND ARROW PARK GRADING AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLBTION FOR THE WORN 3F. Approval of acceptance of Street Improvements for CUP 83-04 at 6386 Sapphire. RESOLUTION NO. 84-232 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR CUP 83-04 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 3G. Approval to award contract (C084-50) for design services of Amethyst Avenue Sidewalk Improvement (East side) between Base Line Road and Monte Vista Street to Wilson-Bryant & Associates for the amount of $6,500.00 plus 10Z for contingencies. 3H. Approval to award (C084-51) contract for design services for the reconstruction of Ramona Avenue to Derbish, Guerra & Associates for an amount not to exceed $5,580.00 and will be funded by Gas Tax 206 and 207 funds. 3I. Approval of Subordination Agreement submitted by Kenco Machine Inc. for DR 81-33, located at 10234 4th Street. RESOLUTION NO. 84-233 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, APPROVING A SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT FROM KENCO MACHINE INC. AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERN TO SIGN SAM~ 33. Approval of Deferred Compensation Contract & Resolution. RESOLUTION NO. 84-234 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ADOPTING AN EMPLOYEES' DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AGREEMENTS RELATED TO SAID PLAN BY THE DEFERRED COMPENSATION ADMINISTRATOR 3K. Approval of Resolution proclaiming Rancho Cucamonga's official belt buckle. RESOLUTION NO. 84-235 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PROCLAIMING RANCHO CUCAHONGA'S OFFICIAL BELT BUCKLE City Council Minutes September 5, 1984 Page 3 3L. Set public hearing for October 17, decision approving private open space 12414. 1984 for appeal of Planning Commission credit to the A-M Company for Tract 3M. Set public hearing for October 17, 1984 for approval of Environmental Assessment and Development District Amendments 84-02 A, B, and C, 19th Street corridor land use amendments. (IT~i~ ~O~1} FOR DISCUSSION). 3N. Set public hearing for October 17, 1984 for approval of Environmental Assessment and General Plan Amendments 84-02 A, B, and C, 19th Street corridor land use amendments. (ITI~ III~OVED FOR DISCUSSION). MOTION: Moved by Dahl, seconded by King to approve the Consent Calendar with items M and N removed for discussion. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. DISCUSSION OF ITEMS M AND N: Mr. King stated on October 3rd he would not be present, and he would like another date set for these items so he could be present to participate. MOTION: Moved by King, seconded by Wright to set items M and N for October 17, 1984. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. 4. NON-ADVERTISED HEARINGS 4A. CONSIDERATION OF MOBILE HOME PARK RENT ADJUSTMENT ORDINANCE - The City Council will continue discussion of an ordinance providing for a maximum rent adjustment allowed annually in mobile home parks. Item continued from August 15, 1984 meeting. Reports presented to Council by Jeffery King and Pamela Wright, members of the Council Subcommittee working on this item. Before Council for consideration was the second reading of Ordinance No. 231 and a new version of Ordinance No. 231 to be considered as an urgency measure. Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council were: Jack Williams, representing RCMORE and the designated spokesman for the tenants, stated that although they had presented some changes to the Council, in order to avoid confusion, they were requesting that Council move forward with the second reading and adoption of Ordinance No. 231. Judy Upton, Western Mobilehome Association, representing the park owners, stated they have developed a fair and acceptable lease. There is good communication with the residents and city staff. They wanted to be given a chance to move forward with the lease without the intervention of government. Bill Schniwahlt, general manager of Alta Laguna, felt there are some things the tenants are uncomfortable with. They are willing to make some changes in the lease. They have committed to work with residents to iron out all problems. According to GSMOL, there has never been an incident in California that all owners and residents have gotten together to form a lease to resolve their problems. He felt that adoption of ordinances was what usually stopped this. Just the series of meetings which we have had is an accomplishment. Their park agreed they would like their rent increase to be extended to January 1st instead of in October in order to continue with these negotiations. They do not see any reason for Council adopting the ordinance, and would like to have the ordinance continued to the first available date in November in order for the owners to iron out all problems with the residents. Then by that time they would deserve the ordinance if things were not in order. There being no further response from the public, Mayor Mikels closed the public hearing. ~ouncil Minutes September 5, 1984 Page 4 After much discussion by Council as to whether to proceed with the second reading of Ordinance No. 231, the following motions were made: MOTION: Moved by King, seconded by Dahl to adopt Ordinance No. 231. Mr. Dahl requested that the motion be amended to include the section in bold that states, "not covered under an insurance policy." After some discussion, Council concurred to include this. Mr. King pointed out this was not included in the original ordinance. Councilwoman Wright expressed that the addition was out of order since it was not included in the original ordinance and it was only put before them for consideration just before the meeting and not made public. MOTION: Moved ~y Wright to delete section 8.10.110 and add the words, "Review Clause" instead of "Termination Clause." Motion failed for lack of second. City Clerk Authelet read the title of Ordinance No. 231. ORDINANCE NO. 231 (urgency) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 8.10 OF THE R~CHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE, PROVIDING FOR AN ANNDA~ MAXIMUM RENT ADJUSTMENT AND DECLARING ~E URGENCY THEREOF MOTION: '~oved by King, seconded by Dahl to waive full reading of urgency Ordinanc~ No. 231. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. MOTION: Moved by King, seconded by Dahl to adopt Ordinance No. 231 as an urgency measure which includes the wording presented by Councilnmn Dahl, "not covered by insurance," and provides a sunset clause of November 21, 1984. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Buquet, Mikels, Dahl, King NOES: Wright ABSENT: None (15) 4B. CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE IMPOSING A MORATORIUM ON THE INCREASE OF MOBILE HOME PARE SPACE RENTS - The City Council will discuss an Ordinance imposing a moratorium on rent increases through December 19, 1984. ACTION: Because of the preceeding action in Item 4A, Council concurred proceed with this item. ORDINANCE NO. 232 (urgency) (not adopted) not to AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF R~CHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, IMPOSING A MORATORIUM ON THE INCREASE OF MOBILE HOME PARK SPACE RENTS, AND DECLARING THE URGENCY THEREOF Mayor Mikels called a recess at 8:45 p.m. with all members of Council present. The meeting reconvened at 9:08 p.m. , , , , , , City Council Minutes September 5, 1984 Page 5 5. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS 5A. APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION DENYING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 84-08 - R.J. INVESTMENTS - The development of a 126 unit apartment complex on 9.03 acres of land in the Medium Residential District (8-14 du/ac), located on the west side of Baker, south of Foothill - APN 207-580-57, 58 and APN 207-571-79. Applicant had requested the item be withdrawn. Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public hearing in case someone had come to address the issue. Addressing Council was: Sherry Konya stated she had come to address the item and was pleased this had been withdrawn. She would take this information back to the homeowners. There being no further public response, Mayor Mikels closed the public hearing. ACTION: Item had been withdrawn by applicant. , , , , , 5B. APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION TO REQUIRE A FOCUSED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 84-22 - BENTSEN - The development of a 924 unit apartment complex to be built in 3 phases on approximately 58.3 acres of land on the north side of Highland Avenue, east of Haven in the MH Development District - APN 202-271-59, 60. Staff report presented by Rick Gomez, City Planner. Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council were: John Mannerino, representing Lan Bentsen Interest, stated they were here to determine whether or not the Planning Commission was in error in requiring a focused environmental impact report specifically on the issues of land use, traffic and circulation, density, and the identification of other land uses. Also to determine whether or not it would have been more appropriate to give a negative declaration or to consider whether or not the resolutions of those issues are more appropriately determined in design review and not in environmental review. They were requesting that they be allowed to proceed to design review since they felt the project complied with the General Plan pursuant to an Environmental Impact Report certified by the City Council in 1981. Donald King, planning consultant located at 9375 Archibald Avenue, addressed the issue of adequacy of information. The City did have an Environmental Impact Report prepared by Sedway Cooke in 1979 and 1980 that was certified by the City in 1980. There was a study area which included this project site from approximately Highland Avenue to the northern city limits from Haven Avenue to Milliken Avenue. The immediate project vicinity projected 1200 plus apartment units which should come in under some growth management procedure by which the urban facilities and services required could be provided, there would be no significant impact. Their proposal is for 328 units. They felt that 1200 units would not create a significant impact and that same information is still valid. A traffic analysis was done at the same time by DKS Associates, transportation engineers, for the circulation element of the General Plan. For this particular area they found no significant traffic and transportation impact. Relative to land use alternatives, the State law states that if you do an EIR you must look at alternatives. For the Environmental Assessment which is required by the City, they felt went beyond and provided a report equivalent to a draft environmental impact report. City Council Minutes September 5, 1984 Page 6 Lan Bentsen, Chairman of the Board of Lan Bentsen Interest, developers of high-quality family communities. They felt they were not the typical apartment developer. They provided high-quality, multi-family, long-term housing for people who could not afford homes. Developments include security systems, both in-unit and parameter security systems, substantial level of on-site amenities. The first site in California which they chose to develop in was Rancho Cucamonga. They first did their research, determined they wanted to be here, hired consultants to be sure they were doing everything right. They want to be provided the opportunity to proceed in a timely fashion to perform as they would like to. Jack Sylvester, former owner of the property who sold the property to Lan Bentsen. He urged Council to considering letting this project go forward. Mr. Mannerino requested that a negative declaration be issued for this project, an~ that it be placed on the next design review hearing so they may proceed with design modifications if necessary. David Barker, vice chairman of the Planning Commission, stated that the Planning Commission felt strongly about their decision and recommendation to Council. The Planning Commission does not always come to an unanimous decision, but in this instance their decision was made on a 5-0 vote. They questioned the adequacy of the information so they have asked that a third party, an independent agent, present a focused EIR in the areas outlined in the staff report. Dennis Stout, Chairman of the Planning Commission, stated the Planning Commission felt very strongly about this project. He stressed that they needed the proper tools to effectively evaluate ~his and encouraged Council to uphold the Planning Commission's decision to require a focused EIR. Bruce Ann Hahn, 9910 La Vine Street, Alta Loma, stated that she had attended the neighborhood meetings when Lan Bentsen had their traffic engineer present. When he was asked what the best way was to move the traffic out of there, he answered that ultimately the best way would be to go through the commercial site and up in through the project. This does not show up on the plans at this time; they show it all going out onto Haven. In Exhibit 3 of the traffic analysis it does show this option. She felt this area should be studied because of the additional traffic. Jeff Sceranka, 6211 Phillips Way, expressed that the City has already gone through the General Plan and EIR approval process. Specific site plan mitigation measures for circulation, design issues and relationship to surrounding uses should be done in design and development review. This is the process which needs to be followed. The environmental assessments have shown the information which was necessary to take the project to the next step and it is a moral obligation for the City to consider seriously why they would refuse at this point to not allow the project to go forward to the legitimate process. Concerns of the residents can be met through design review. Darrell Nicolay, 6245 DeCota, spokesman for the neighborhood, stated they were concerned about the density level in that area, and feel that in 1980 when the General Plan was adopted but in the past 4-5 years there have been many changes. They feel t~e area does not warrant this type of development right now and felt there should be an EIR should be done. James Barton, 552 Canistel, Barton Development, expressed that the City has gone through master planning and environmental impact reports in order to do planning for future city growth. As the City grows, changes occur. The City Council and Planning Commission has within its power to review these areas and say there is a change which is taking place from what our original intent was. As a result, we must look at the specific areas and re-review our decision of the past. The City Council should decide which areas are in question and make them special study areas, then make it know publicly so a developer will know before he purchases the property. Darrell Nicolay also opposed the shopping center which was supposed to go in adjacent to the apartment complex. He felt there were too many shopping centers in that area. City Council Minutes September 5, 1984 Page 7 Dr. Borran, expressed opposition of the requirement of the EIR and felt the development should proceed. Chris Borcarol, 6214 Valinda Street, did not want apartments or multi family units near his home. There being no further response, Mayor Mikels closed the public hearing. Councilman King expressed concern as it relates to transportation, ingress, and egress, but was not sure an EIR was necessary to get this information since the information could be provided by further study by staff and more information provided by the applicant. Mayor Mikels read the report and was concerned basically with traffic. He felt there was ~oo much traffic coming out onto Lemon Avenue. He felt he needed more information regarding this before he could make a decision. Councilman Dahl stated he had problems regarding the project as a whole and the balance of density within the project and how it will impact the surrounding areas. On one hand he supported the Planning Commission's decision but on the other hand he could not see why require an EIR on the project when he felt the problems could be mitigated in design review and Planning Commission level. He did want Council adhere to the Master Storm Drain Plan for this project. Mayor Mikels stated there are four areas identified which were concerns by the Planning Commission which were: land use, density, traffic/circulation, and alternative land uses. The EIR for the General Plan was done specifically to identify alternative land uses. It does not take an EIR to identify density and land use alternatives. However, he needed more information for traffic and circulation. Councilwoman Wright felt the only question was that the Planning Commission felt so strongly that they needed it that it was requested on a 5-0 vote. Therefore, it should be granted. Councilman Buquet expressed he had some concerns with the project, but not to the extent that he felt that a focused EIR needed to be done. MOTION: Moved by King to grant the appellant's appeal as it relates to land use, density, and other land use alternatives; deny appellant's appeal and affirm the Planning Commission's decision as it relates to traffic and circulation; and require a focused EIR for this one issue. Motion failed for lack of a second. Mr. Mannerino stated that Council has only raised questions relating to design, not concerns which would be the subject of an environmental impact report. MOTION: Moved by King, seconded by Buquet to uphold the appeal as it relates to land use, density, and alternative land uses, but require an independent analysis of the traffic and circulation element of the development and that the analysis can occur at the same time as the planning and design process and that the Planning Commission can proceed with a negative declaration. Council asked Mr. Stout if this would provide the Planning Commission the information they needed. Mr. Stout felt the traffic and circulation information would be needed before the development review. Mr. King stated the intent of the motion was that everything should not come to a screeching halt while the analysis was being done. MOTION: Previously made by King, seconded by Buquet was passed by the following vote: AYES: Buquet, Mikels, Dahl, King NOES: Wright City Council Minutes September 5, 1984 Page 8 Mayor Mikels called a recess at 11:15 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 11:35 p.m. with all members of Council present. Because of the lateness of the hour, Council changed the order of the meeting as follows: 6A, 5E, 5C, 5D, 5F, 6B, 6C, 6D, 6E, 6F, 6G, 7A, 7B, 7C. (The minutes are recorded in published sequence. Councilman Buquet left the meeting at 12:00 midnight.) (~8) 5C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 84-02 - Amendments to the Rancho ~ucamonga Development Code, Sections 17.02.110, 17.08.090, 17.08.050 and 17.02.020, Title 17 of the Municipal Code, in relation to time extensions, public hearing notification, transition of density, neighborhood compatibility (site plan design, landscaping, open space, grading, architecture), and preservation of viewshed. Staff report by Dan Coleman, Associate Planner. Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council was: James Barton, Barton Development, encouraged the Council to write something formally so staff will have guidelines and therefore be able to eliminate 90% of debating time. He felt staff could identify the areas which should be looked at as special study areas. Mr. Wasserman suggested that this should be directed back to staff to look at and come back to Council for recommendations. There being no further public response, Mayor Mikels closed the public hearing. City Clerk Authelet read the title of Ordinance No. 233. ORDINANCE NO. 233 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 16, SECTION 1.401.11.2 OF THE CITY'S MUNICIPAL CODE, IN RELATION TO TENTATIVE MAP TIME EXTENSIONS. MOTION: Moved by Dahl, seconded by King to waive full reading of Ordinance No. 233. Motion carried 4-0-1 (Buquet absent). Mayor Mikels set second reading for October 3, 1984. City Clerk Authelet read the title of Ordinance No. 234. ORDINANCE NO. 234 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 17, SECTIONS 17.02.110, 17.08.090, 17.08.050, AND 17.02.020 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE, IN RELATION TO TIME EXTENSIONS, PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION, TRANSITION OF DENSITY, NEIGHBORHOOD COMPATIBILITY (SITE PLAN DESIGN, LANDSCAPING, OPEN SPACE, GRADING AND ARCHITECTURE), AND PRESERVATION OF VIEWSHED MOTION: Moved by King, seconded by Dahl to waive full reading of Ordinance No. 234. Motion carried 4-0-1 (Buquet absent). Mayor Mikels set October 3, 1984 for second reading of Ordinance No. 234. , ** , ~ Minutes September 5, 1984 Page 9 5D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 84-03 An amendment to the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code, Title 17 of the Municipal Code, amending Chapter 17.08 Residential Districts, regarding residential development standards and, in particular, amendments to the Low-Medium residential development standards. Staff report by Dan Coleman, Associate Planner. Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council was: Larry Bliss, 6634 Carnelian, expressed this ordinance would present problems for one of his developments east of Haven where he is trying to be creative and get rid of the usual "cookie cutter" type layout. Discussion followed regarding this matter. Concern was that this development only required a 28 foot wide street as opposed 36 feet wide for public streets. On the other hand Council was concerned about making this flexible enough in order to allow for creative development. ACTION: Council directed back to staff to come forth at second reading with some language options which would allow for some flexibility. City Clerk Authelet read the title of Ordinance No. 235. ORDINANCE NO. 235 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 84-03, AMENDING TITLE 17 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE, CHAPTER 17.08, RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, REGARDING RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS MOTION: Moved by King, seconded by Wright to waive full reading of Ordinance No. 235. Motion carried 4-0-1 (Buquet absent). Mayor Mikels set second reading for September 19, 1984. 5E. FORMATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 3 ALONG BASE LINE ROAD FROM TEAK WAY TO EAST OF HERMOSA AVENUE - A public hearing to determine whether the public necessity, health, safety or welfare requires the formation of Underground Utility District No. 3 along Base Line Road from Teak Way to East of Hermosa Avenue. Staff report presented by Blane Frandsen, Senior Civil Engineer. Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. City Clerk Authelet read the title of Resolution No. 84-236. RESOLUTION NO. 84-236 A RESOLUTION OF .THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FORMING UNDERGROUND UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 3 ALONG BASE LINE ROAD FROM TE~d( WAY TO EAST OF HERMOSA AVENUE MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Wright to adopt Resolution No. 84-236 finding that the public necessity, health, safety and welfare requires the formation of Underground Utility District No. 3 along Base Line Road from Teak Way to east of Hermosa Avenue. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. (Items 5F and 5G were handled together). City Council Minutes September 5, 1984 Page 10 (21) (22) (23) (24) 5F. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR CUP 84-06 - HFA ASSOCIATES - Review and consideration of a supplemental Environmental Impact Report (EIR) prepared for development of a regional shopping center on 100 acres of land in the Victoria Planned Community to be located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, west of Interstate 15 - APN 227-201-35 and APN 227-211-30. Item continued to September 19, 1984 meeting. 5G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CUP 84-06 - HFA ASSOCIATES - Conceptual review of a master plan for the development of a regional shopping center on 100 acres of land in the Victoria Planned Community to be located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, west of Interstate 15 - APN 227-201-35 and APN 227-201-30. Item continued to September 19, 1984 meeting. MOTION: Moved by Wright, seconded by King to continue items 5F and 5G to September 19, 1984. Motion carried 4-0-1 (Buquet absent). , , , , , , 6. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS 6A. REQUEST FROM R.G. BARTHOLOMEUSZ FOR CITY COUNCIL TO CONSIDER WAIVING DRAINAGE AND PARK FEES ON RESIDENTIAL DWELLING ADDITION. Staff report presented by Lauren Wasserman, City Manager. Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public comments. Addressing Council were: Mr. Bartholomeusz presented his request to have drainage and park fees waived. Jim Glass, representing Mrs. Adams, who lives on Hillside and has a similar situation. Mrs. Adams is building a two story addition to her home. They felt that the amount over 600 square feet which is above ground on a second story should not be assessed. There being no further response, Mayor Mikels closed the public portion of the meeting. After some discussion regarding the issue, Council took the following action: MOTION: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Buquet to deny the request. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. 6B. BASE LINE ROAD CLOSURE REQUEST - Request from William Lyon Company to close Base Line Road in the vicinity of Day Creek for a period of 45 days to construct box culvert under the road. Staff report presented by Paul Rougeau, Senior Civil Engineer. Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public input. Addressing Council were: Steven Ford, William Lyon ~ompany, requested the closure. James Barton, Barton Development, stated that detours are most hazardous. There being no further comments from the public, Mayor Mikels closed the public portion of the meeting. MOTION: Moved by King to allow the road closure for 45 days. For lack of second, the motion failed. MOTION: Moved by Wright, seconded by Dahl to deny the request for road closure and to require a temporary detour. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Wright, Mikels, Dahl NOES: King ABSENT: Buquet City Council Minutes September 5, 1984 Page i1 (Items 6C, 6D, and 6E were handled together). 6C. APPROVAL OF FINAL PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND AUTHORIZATION TO SOLICIT CONSTRUCTION BIDS FOR THE BEAR GULCH PARK DEVELOPMENT 6D. APPROVAL OF FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR "UNNAMED" PARK (CHURCH, EAST OF HAVEN) AND ISSUANCE OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR PARK IMPROVEMENT PROJECT. 6E. APPROVAL OF FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR WINDROWS PARK IN THE VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY AND ISSUANCE OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE PARK CONSTRUCTION PROJECT. Staff report presented by Bill Holley, Community Services Director. Mayor Mikeis opened the meeting for public input. There being no response, the public portion of the meeting was closed. MOTION: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Wright to approve items 6C, 6D, 6E approving the final plans and specifications for Bear Gulch Park, Unnamed Church Street Park, and Windrows Park; authorize advertisement for construction bids; and approve negative declarations for the parks since they will have no significant effect on the environment. Motion carried 4-0-1 (Buquet absent). 6F. CHANGE OF MUNICIPAL ELECTION DATE ACTION: Council concurred to bring item back on September consideration. Ordinance was not given a reading. ORDINANCE NO. 236 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING THAT THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SHALL BE HELD ON THE SAME DAY AS THE STATEWIDE GENERAL ELECTION, NAMELY, THE FIRST TUESDAY AFTER THE FIRST MONDAY OF NOVEMBER IN EACH EVEN NUMBERED YEAR 19, 1984 for 6G. CITIES AND SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY ANNUAL INFORMATIONAL EXCHANGE CONFERENCE, OCTOBER 11-12, 1984 - The City Council will discuss participation in this year's conference. Councilman Dahl stated he would be attending, but would not be staying overnight. 7. COUNCIL BUSINESS 7A. RESIDENT-OWNED MOBILEHOME PARK DEVELOPMENT ALTERNATIVES - City Council will consider discussing potential alternatives to the development of resident owned mobile home parks. Councilman King stated that since the one requesting the item was not present and there was no one present who was interested in the matter, that the item be continued at such time as is requested. Council concurred. , , , , , , 7B. LOCATION OF WEST VALLEY COURT FACILITIES - The City Council will consider urging the San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors to utilize the Foothill Communities Law and Justice Center as the sole court facility in the West Valley area exclusive of the Chino court facility. Mayor Mikels presented the request. City Council Minutes September 5, 1984 Page 12 (32) City Clerk Authelet read the title of Resolution No. 84-237. RESOLUTION NO. 84-237 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, STRONGLY URGING THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS TO UTILIZE THE FOOTHILL COMENITIES LAW AND JUSTICE CENTER AS THE SOLE COURT FACILITY IN THE WEST VALLEY AREA EXCLUSIVE OF THE CHINO COURT FACILITY MOTION: Moved by Wright, seconded by King to adopt Resolution No. 84-237 urging the Board of Supervisors to utilize the new Foothill Communities Law and Justice Center as the sole West Valley Court facility and to waive full reading. Motion carried 4-0-1 (Buquet absent). 7C. ADDED ITEM: DEER CANYON SCHOOL. Councilman Dahl requested that Council take a look at the road at Deer Canyon School and direct staff to come for with some recommendations. (33) , , , , , 7D. ADDED ITEM: ZONING AT CASALETTI'S. Councilman Dahl requested that the Planning Commission review the zoning for the Casalecti property in Etiwanda. 8. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Moved by King, seconded by Wright to adjourn to a Closed Session on September 13, 1984 at 6:00 p.m. to discuss personnel matters. Motion carried 4-0-1 (Buquet absent). The meeting adjourned at 1:00 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Beverly A. Authelet City Clerk