Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1983/06/01 - Minutes June 1, 1983 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Regular Meeting I. CALL TO ORDF_,R A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga was held in the Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road on Wednesday, June 1, 1983. The meeting was called to order at 7:40 p.m. by Mayor Jon D. Mikeis. Present were: Council members Richard M. Dahl, Charles J. Buquet II, Phillip D. Schlosser, James C. Frost, and Mayor Jon D. Mikeis. Also present were: City Manager, Lauren M. Wasserman; Assistant City Manager, Jim Robinson; City Attorney, Robert Dougherty; Community Development Director, Jack Lam; City Engineer, Lloyd Hubbs; Finance Director, Harry Empey; and Community Services Director, Bill Holley. Approval of Minutes: Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Frost to approve the minutes of April 19 and April 20, 1983- Motion carried unanimously 5-0- 2. ~iNOU~C~IE~rS a. Thursday, June 2, 7:00 p.m. - HISTORICAL COMMISSION - Lions Park Community Center. b. Tuesday, June 7, at Red Lion Inn, Opportunity '83, Economic Development Conference from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. c. Friday, June 10, West End Board of Realtors will challenge the Mayors of the West End at a donkey basketball game to be held at Alta Loma High School. d. Mr. Wasserman requested item "j" and "n" be removed from the Consent Calendar. e. Mr. Dahl requested item "g" be removed; Mayor Mikeis requested item "p" be removed; and Mr. Buquet requested item "o" be removed for discussion. 3- CONSENT CALENDAR a. Approval of Warrants, Registers No. 83-05-17 and 83-6-q and payroll ending 5-q5-83 in the amount of $498,621.68. b. Forward Claim against the City by Insurance Company of North America to (1) the City Attorney and Carl Warren Co. for handling. (CL83-15) c. Forward Claim against the City by Carol Ann Brendel to the City Attorney (2) and Carl Warren Co. for handling. (CL83-16) d. Alcoholic Beverage License Application for on-sale beer and wine public (3) premise license to Darlene H. Schultz, Scotty's BAr, 8890 Eighth Street. e. Request approval to advertise for bids for construction of a 'storm drain (4) on Beryl Street from Alta Loma Park to 19th Street. (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (~) (~2) (13) City Council Minutes June 1, 1983 Page 2 f. Request approval to advertise for bids for construction of a sidewalk on Base Line from Hellman Avenue to Alta Loma High School. ~Pa.e~eP e~ a~ Ase~e~a~ g~v~ ~.eePt ~ Peq.ee~ a.~eP~sa~e. ~e PeeP.~ ~eP ~e ¥aea~ Aeeee~e~e G~v~ ~.~eeP pee~e~. Item removed by Council for discussion. h. Request authorization of $6,216, from Beautification Funds, to fund sidewalk extensions at bridge crossings of the Cucamonga Creek. i. Approval of Parcel Map 7646, surety, and agreement submitted by Calvin Morgan located on the south side of Hillside between Carnelian and Beryl. RESOLUTION NO. 83-71 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NO. 7646, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY. av Req~ee~ appPeva~ ~e Pemeve e~ea~e~ e~e p~a~e~ a~e~8 ~e ~Pa~ a~ 9~9g Me~a~&~a DP~ve a~ R~O~g~tON NOv ~-~ A RE~G~GN O~ ~E G~ GG~NGt~ OR ;RE gt~ O~ RANGNO G~GAMGNGAT GA~$~GRNSAT ~$~AB~SR~NG A RG~G~ ;H~ R~AN~NG 9~ ;O~G R~AN;S A~ONG GOH)~jN~;~ W~;H~N ;HB G~;~ Q~ RANGHG G~GAMGNGA, Item removed by staff. k. Acceptance of Parcel Map 7834 located on the north side of Via E1 Dorado and the west siBe of Sunstone, submitted by Jensen. RESOLUTION NO. 83-73 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP 7834. 1, Approval of improvement extension agreement for Minor Development Review 82-08 located at 8270 Foothill Blvd, RESOLUTION NO, 83-74 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT EXTENSION AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 82-08. m. Acceptance of Parcel Map 7832 located at the northwest corner of Hillside and Moonstone Avenue, RESOLUTION NO. 83-75 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP 7832, Rv Ae®ep%aRee e~ ~aPee~ )lap ~T beRdet a~Peeme~t aRd ~&e~ a~PeemeR~ B~v~v a,d Rame,a AveR,e. item removed by staff. RESOLUTION NO. 83-76 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 6114, BONDS, AGREEMENT, AND A REAL PROPERTY CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT. City Council Minutes June 1, 1983 Page 3 e. A.~eP~sa~en ~e e,~e,d G~ e~eee~ ~ease a8peeme,~ ~ep ere add~e~a~ yeaPT ~ e~s~B FaCeT ~e e~p~Pe J.~e ~gT ~9~4, Item removed for discussion by Council. (C0101) p, Req~ee% ~eP~a~&e~ ~eP emeP~e~e~ Pee~ Pepa~P e~ 6&e~s RaP~ Gee~eP -- ee~ ~e eMeeed $4,eee, Item removed by Council for discussion. q. Set public hearing date for June 15, 1983 for Environmental Assessment and Sign Ordinance Revisions. An amendment to the sign regulations contained in Title 14 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. This is a comprehensive amendment intended to improve the administration and to provide for more effective signing. The basic regulations are not being changed. Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Frost to approve the balance of the Consent Calendar (items g, j, n, o, and p removed). Motion carried unanimously 5-0. Discussion of Ires *g*: Mr. Dahl stated that the staff report only mentioned the Assistant Civil Engineer position. He asked what the salary of the Associate Civil Engineer was and what the cost impact would be. Mr. Hubbs stated that the Associate position is currently an approved position. By filling this position, then the budget picture would not be changed from what was currently approved. This is why that item was not discussed. Mr. Hubbs also stated that we had an Associate position reclassified to an Assistant position. Therefore, when the reclassification occurred, it opened up an Associate position. In other words, Mr. Dahl stated that what we are doing is moving the Assistant Engineer which is presently performing the position of an Associate Engineer at an Assistant Engineer's salary base. Then we will be moving the Assistant Engineer into a position of Traffic Analyst with an increased salary rate over what °a Traffic Analyst normally receives. Mr. Hubbs stated this was correct; it would amount to approximately a 5 percent rate increase. Mr. Wasserman pointed out that we would also be eliminating a part time student aid position. The net result would be about an $8,000 a year savings. Dlsoussion of Ire. *o*: Mr. Buquet expressed we should not be locked into a two year lease. He felt we should be exploring some other alternatives. Mr. Wasserman stated that the only alternative was to build something. It would take us about the same length of time to do so. If Council is looking at other rental facilities, then we would be precluded. Mr. Buquet did not want to lock us into this point of time, but he felt a decision should not be made tonight off the Consent Calendar. After further discussion, Council concurred to discuss this at the June 15 meeting. Disoussion of Ite~ *p*: Mayor Mikeis wanted to know what the emergency was that the money was being requested from reserves. Mr. Wasserman responded that Lion's Center roof leaked. Since we can't have contingency funds any longer, then the amount will have to come from reserves. Discussion of Ire. *3*: Mr. Dahl requested that we proceed to have the oleanders removed. Mr. Frost requested that staff work with the people to give them some time to remove the oleanders themselves before the City went in to remove them. Staff had previously requested to have Resolution No. 83-72 removed since, according to the City Attorney, it would not have enforcing powers. Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Frost to approve Consent Calendar items "g", "p", and part of "j". Motion carried unanimously (x4) (x5) (~6) 4. JJ)IFBIiTT-~BD PUBLIC H]~ARINC~ A. ~TI~ANDA SPECIFIC PLJtN AND A~OCIITED ITB~. Staff report by Otto Kroutil and Tim Beedie. (~7) (is) City Council Minutes June 1, 1983 Page h (1) ETIWAM])A SPECIFIC PLAM REVIEW. Mr. Kroutil briefly reviewed changes made to date. He stated there were three new items for consideration. (a) Water Conservation. A request has been received from the Cucamonga County Water District to include some additional text regarding water conservation. Mayor Mikels asked if there was any discussion on the suggested revisions by Council. Council had none. (b) Fire Protection. The request had been handed out just prior to the meeting this evening. Mr. Kroutil stated that staff has gone through the text and there appears to be no substantive change to the intent of the Plan. It was more in terms of clarification. It states the need to follow fire codes, etc. Mayor Mikels asked if there was any discussion by Council regarding the communication from the Fire District. There was none. (e) Interim Agricultural Uses. Mayor Mikels asked if there were any question on the language proposed. Mr. Frost stated he could see some potential problems with some types of permitted uses in infill areas. Generally the 2 1/2 acre criteria was not a problem, but there were some examples where this would be too small to adequately address surrounding areas insofar as raising hogs as an example. Mr. Kroutil pointed out that the language presented is part of the development code and this would not be any different in Etiwanda than elsewhere in the City. Staff's intent was to include the langage here since the questions would come up. Mr. Frost stated his question was did they feel we had sufficient control over future uses. After further discussion, Council concurred that if this needed to be addressed further, then it should be addressed as a General Plan Change. Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public hearing on the previous items relating to the Specific Plan and for the new items by the Water District and Fire District and for the interim agricultural uses. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Dahl to approve the language revisions as submitted by the Water District and Fire District, and the proposed language for interim agriculture uses. Motion carried unanimously 5- O. (2) FINAL E~IROM~E~L ]I~PACT REPORT. Mr. Kroutil stated the Final 'Environmental Impact Report was required by State law. Mr. Kroutil stated that the text changes were reflected in the EIR. Mayor MikeIs opened the meeting for public hearing for comments on the EIR. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. City Clerk Wasserman read the title of Resolution No. 83-77- RESOLUTION NO. 83-77 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING THAT THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT PREPARED FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 83-01B AND FOR THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN IS COMPLETE AND ADEQUATE. City Council Minutes June 7, 1983 Page 5 Mr. Frost stated that the only complication he could preceive is whether it adequately reflects some of the changes in circulation and land uses and whether the EIR should be altered the reflect the impact of those changes. Mr. Kroutil stated this had to do with traffic and other impacts. As far as other impacts are concerned, staff has looked at the project within the limitations of the General Plan which would allow a bit more in terms of total population in future development. As far as specific traffic patterns resulting from specific land use decisions, he would have to refer this to the city engineer. Mr. Hubbs stated they have analyzed various traffic impacts at various levels of development and basically ended up with the same conclusions. The current plan is lower in intensity than some of the earlier plans. He felt their concerns regarding Etiwanda Avenue has been dealt with adequately in the EIR. Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Schlosser to approve the Environmental Impact Report and to waive full reading of Resolution No. 83-77. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. (3) GEMERAL PLAM ~ 83-O1B. Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public hearing on the General Plan Amendment 83-01B. Addressing Council were: Dr. Roland Smith, owner of property on the southwest corner of Etiwanda and Base Line, and which is currently zoned residential. Mr. Smith stated in light of the changes that are proposed, the property will be heavily impacted not only with respect to the fair market value, but also disposal of the property would be impaired. Mr. and Mrs. Smith felt their concerns had not been properly addressed. If these concerns are not properly addressed, they would be taking the necessary action to have a judgement filed until they feel properly heard to their satisfaction. Mayor Mikels asked him to summarized his concerns. Mr. Smith stated that his concern was that a commercial zone came in that they were not aware of across the street from them which will impact their area and depreciate their value. Their property is designated low-medium and all around them is commercial. They had tried several times to obtain a commercial designation for their property and have been turned down. He also has another ten acres which has been designated as a school area off Pecan. He feels all of this is unfair. Anne Smith stated that they felt they had been discriminated against since they had not been notified about the other area being designated commercial. There being no further response, Mayor Mikels closed the public hearing. City Clerk Wasserman read the title of Resolution No. 83-78. RESOLUTION NO. 83-78 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT OF THE CITY'S GENERAL PLAN. Mr. Frost stated that item 4 should be heard before item 3. Mr. Beedle pointed out that State law requires that prior to the adoption of a Specific Plan, it must be found to be consistent with the General Plan. Therefore, it is a matter that the General Plan should be in place first prior to actual adoption of a Specific Plan. Mr. Dougherty concurred with Mr. Beedie. (~9) City Council Minutes June 1, 1983 Page 6 Mayor Mikels felt that perhaps Council should hold Resolution No. 83-79 to be approved at the same time as Ordinance No. 203. Motion: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Schlosser to approve Resolution No. 83- 78. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. (20) (4) ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN: ADOPTION. Mr. Dougherty pointed out that a new first reading of the Ordinance would be required. Action on Resolution No. 83-79 could be taken tonight or at the time action is taken on the Ordinance. Mayor Mikeis felt the approval of the Specific Plan should be done at the same as the regulating ordinance. Mayor Mikeis opened the meeting for public hearing to consider Ordinance No. 203. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. City Clerk Waserman read the title of Ordinance No. 203. ORDINANCE NO. 203 (seeend first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE REGULATORY PROVISIONS SECTION OF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AND AMENDING THE CITY'S ZONING MAP FOR THE ETIWANDA AREA ACCORDING TO THESE PROVISIONS. RESOLUTION NO. 83-79 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN. Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Schlosser to waive full reading of Ordinance No. 203. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. Mayor Mikeis set June 15 for second reading and consideration of Resolution No. 83-79. (21) (22) B. SENIOR HOUSING OVERLAI DISTRICT: DRAFT GENERAL DEVELOPMENT AGRE~I~NT. Lauren Wasserman requested item be continued to July 6, 1983- RESOLUTION NO. 83-54 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A GENERAL DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT TO BE USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH HOUSING UNITS PRODUCED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE SENIOR HOUSING OVERLAY DISTRICT. Motion: Moved by Schlosser, soeonded by Dahl to continue to July 6. Motion carried unanimously 5-0- C. APPEAL OF PLANNING Cae4IBSION DECISION ON GENERAL PLAN ~ND!~JIT 83-01A - KANOK~ECHA~ANT. A request to amend the General Plan Land Use Plan for medium density residential (4-14 dwelling units per acre) to medium-high residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) on approximately 15.5 acres of land located at the northeast corner of Base Line and Rochester Avenue APN 227'091'45- Staff report by Rick Gomez, City Planner. City Council Minutes June 1, 1983 Page 7 Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council were: Tom Davis, 9581 Business Center Drive, architect retained to prepare some exhibits which he went over. Jim Banks, Etiwanda resident, stated that Don Baer had opposed this at the Planning Commission public hearing. As of a week ago, Mr. Baer stated he hadl not changed his mind. Mr. Banks stated the only reason he would be in favor of a development like this was that he did not like to see the small landowners having to have second hand treatment compared to the large landowners. But for all other reasons, he would definitely be opposed to this. He expressed concern with the 4-14 category and did not want to see this increased to 16. People in Etiwanda do not want the higher density, and felt that Council should draw the line and it should be drawn now. There being no further public response, Mayor Mikels closed the public hearing. Mr. Buquet expressed that a 4-14 range was ridiculous, but that was another issue. One of his concerns is the present land use north of the subject property. He was not sure how conducive that site would be to develop around. If nothing else, this project would help hide that use. He also expressed concern over the density of 16 and wanted something done to prohibit this from coming in higher. Mr. Dahl agreed that density was an issue in the City, but he felt that of all areas in the City, this one which was adjacent to a channel, railroad track, and a lumber yard deserved a higher density. However, if this is built, it should be built at the low end of the density scale. Discussion followed by Council regarding the density designation. Motion: Moved by Sehlosser, seconded by Frost to leave the density as is, uphold the Planning Commission's decision, and deny the appeal. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Schlosser, Frost, Mikels NOES: Dahl, Buquet ABSENT: None D. VACATION OF SER~I~E ROAD. Located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard in connection with Parcel Map 6114 submitted by Vista Investment. Item originally set for the March 16 city council meeting. Lloyd Hubbs, city engineer, requested the item be continued to July 6, 1983. Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Schlosser to continue to July 6. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. RESOLUTION NO. 83-80 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ORDERING TO BE VACATED A PORTION OF THE FRONTAGE ROAD ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, WEST OF RAMONA AVENUE (PARCEL MAP 6114). (23) E. ~IROM~TaL aSSESSMUT ~MD zoMnm ORDMCM m~ame~ 83-03. An amendment to the residential use standards to allow for second dwelling units on single family zoned residential lots. Staff report by Rick Gomez, City Planner. (24) City Council Minutes June 1, 1983 Page 8 Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. City Clerk Wasserman read the title of Ordinance No. 204. ORDINANCE NO. 204 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 61.024A (b) OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA INTERIM ZONING ORDINANCE TO ALLOW FOR SECOND DWELLING UNITS IN SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONES. Motion: Moved by Frost, seconded by Dahl to waive further reading of Ordinance No. 204. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Schlosser to approve Ordinance No. 204. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Dahl, Buquet, Sehlosser, Frost, Mikels NOES: None ABSENT: None Mayor Mikeis called a recess at 9:00 p.m. with all members of the Council present. The meeting reconvened at 9:20 p.m. None submitted. 5- ORDINANCES FOR CONSIDERATION 6. CITY~AGKR'3 STAFF REPORTS (25) (26) A. CONSIDERATION OF CO~I'RaCT FOR AMIMAL COS~OL SERVICES. Staff report by Lauren Wasserman, City Manager. (CO83-028) Pat English of the San Bernardino County Animal Control was present to answer questions of Council. Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public input. David Flocker asked if animal control provided for the licensing of cats as well. Staff responded no. There being no further input, the public portion of the meeting was closed. Discussion followed between Council and Mr. English regarding the contract. Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Buquet to accept the staff proposal and approve the Agreement with the County of San Bernardino for animal control. Motion eartied unanimously 5-0. B. REGIONAL HOUSING ALLOCATIOM MODEL (RMAM). S~aff report by Rick Gomez, City Planner. Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public input. Addressing Council was: City Council Minutes June 1, 1983 Page 9 Ralph Lewis, Lewis Homes, asked why were they concerned. Was it better to have too high a figure or too low a figure. Mayor Mikels responded that the population numbers, especially during the current five-year period, are important in the determination of the number of very low and low cost housing which the City would have to provide to maintain the consistency of its housing element with its housing assistance plan and the regional housing allocation model thats being developed. The SCAG projections were based upon growth projections which were developed when SCAG '82 was in process and the first three years of that process show relatively little growth. When they developed the RHAM model, they compressed the growth from the growth whieh had been anticipated in those two years plus the growth which was anticipated in the next five into one five-year period. Because of that, the numbers of very low and lost cost housing that would have to be provided under that growth curve would have been beyond the capabilities of the City to provide; over 4,000 units in one year. There being no further public input, the public portion of the meeting was closed. Motion: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Frost to adopt Resolution No. 83-81 and to waive full reading. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. City Clerk Wasserman read title of Resolution No. 83-81. RESOLUTION NO. 83-81 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING REVISION OF THE GROWTH PROJECTIONS CONTAINED WITHIN SCAG '82 AND RHAM HOUSING MODEL. C. ST&TI~ OF PROPO~ COD~ SOLID WASTE REFUSE RATE ADJUSTS. Oral staff report by Robert Rizzo, Administrative Analyst. Mr. Ed. Burr, Rancho Disposal, expressed that those in the industry supported what CounciI was attempting to do. If the Board of Supervisors raised the rates, then the refuse c~mpanies will want to come back at the June 15th meeting to request a rate increase. (27) D. C~RI~ ~(~M REQUEST. A request Christmas House to a Bed and Breakfast Inn. City Manager. to review proposal to convert the Staff report by Lauren Wasserman, Addressing Council were Janice Toews and Jay Illsey who were requesting a response from Council regarding their proposal as to whether there is some merit in the concept. Chief Feuerstein pointed out there was a difference in what would be allowable for a residential use and what would be required for commercial use in terms of alarms systems, wiring, sprinkler systems, etc. Mr. Dougharty stated the property is now located in a R-1 zone and at the present time the use would not be permitted in this zone. He stated he noticed there was a request for a zone variance. The State law was amended several years ago to preclude the granting of use variances. This would be a use variance and as such would be prohibited. Mayor Mikels stated they could not do any m~re than give them their receptivity to the concept. There was no legal binding action by Council. Mr. Frost stated he would like to see the structure maintained, and would like the City to be somewhat flexible in helping that to happen. However, he needed the assurance that it would be done well, otherwise he would vote against it. (28) (29) City Council Minutes June 1, 1983 Page !0 Mr. Schlosser stated, "no comment." Mr. Dahl stated he had problems with the type of use being recommended for the area being recommended. He would not be real favorable at the moment, but could be subject to change with a better presentation. Mr., Buquet stated he strongly cautioned against bidding on the House that is basically in a residential spot zone. He felt they should be concerned with the actual cost of renovation of the house. He felt their estimates were too low. Mayor Mikels stated the house is in a R-1 zone, but it has commercial across the street. The lot is of sufficient size to provide for use like is being suggested. He would not rule it out. It could be made compatible in concept. But what actually came in in actual plan was a different story. E. SETTING OF HEARINGB FOR CONSIDERATION OF FISCAL YEAR 83-84 PROGRAM OF SERVICE. Staff report by Lauren Wasserman, City Manager. Council set the following dates: June 14 at 6:00 p.m. for supper at Lions Park Center to discuss the Program of Service. June 30 at 6:00 p.m. for supper. Advertise the public hearing for 7:00 p.m. for Revenue Sharing. 7- CIT~ ATTORNEY'S REPORTS There were none submitted. 8. COOMCIL BUSINESS There were none submitted. Motion: not to reconvene this evening. adjourned at 10:40 p.m. 9 · ~/)JOUPJ~'MERT Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Dahl to adjourn to Executive Session, Motion carried unanimously 5-0. The meeting Respectfully submitted, Beverly Authelet Deputy City Clerk