Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995/08/23 - Agenda PacketCITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA WEDNESDAY II. IlL IV. AUGUST 23, 1995 7:00 P.M. RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBER 10500 CMC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call Chairman Barker Vice Chairman McNiel Commissioner Lumpp Commissioner Melcher Commissioner Tolstoy __ Announcements Approval of Minutes July 12, 1995 August 9, 1995 Public Hearings The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. Please sign in after speaking. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 95-21 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - An appeal of a request to operate a playschool program for approximately 150 preschool children within the existing classrooms of Hillside Community Church, in the Very Low Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units per acre), located at 5354 Haven Avenue - APN: 1074-271-01. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 14806 - WESTERN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY - A subdivision of 25 acres offand into 8 parcels in the Community Commercial District of the Tetra Vista Community Plan, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard between Spruce and Elm Avenues - 1077-421-58 and 63. Staff Recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. Related file: Conditional Use Permit 93-49 previously approved. VII. VIII. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 95-15 - HOBIN - The proposed development of a 75,192 square foot public storage facility with caretaker's residence on 5.48 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 8) of the InduZstrial Area SpeCific Plan, located on the north side of Arrow Route, east of Rochester Avenue - APN: 229-021-36. MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 87-17 AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 88-28 - RANCHO CUCAMONGA HOSPITAL - A request to modify condif~ous relative to the design of a required outdoor p}aTa and the timing of its construction for an existing vacant hospital complex totaling approximately 99,000 square feet on 6.2 acres of land in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 7) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, located at 10841 White Oak Avenue - APN: 208-351-61. Ev MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 93-46 - FLORES -A request to modify the approved site plan and certain conditions of approval for a previously approved gas station and mini-market in the Community Commercial designation (Subarea 2) of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, located at the southeast comer of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue - APN 208-192-06 and 07. Public Comments This is the time andplace for the genera[public to address the Commission. Items to be discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agendct Commission Business Adjournment The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11.'00 P.M. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission. 1, Gall Sanchez, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby certidS? that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on/lugust 17, 1995, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Ran~ho Cucamonga. VICINITY MAP I AT,& S,F. P~n · k CITY HALL CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA T H E C I T Y .0 F UCANONG July 25, 1995 Doug Wamer 5291 Ozark Mountain Alta Loma, CA 91737 Dear Mr. Warher: RECEIVED AUG 2 3 1995 City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning OMsion I have been advised that several neighbors in the area of the Hillside Community Church have expressed concerns about the Cogunity Services Depazhnent's proposed Playschool Program at Hillside Community Church. This caught us by surprise since the program is very well received by the public and parents. I would like to schedule a meeting with you and your neighbors to discuss the concerns which have been raised. Your phone number was not listed on the sign in sheet from the Planning Department. Could you please call me at 989-1851, ext: 2101 at your earliest convenience. I apologize for not meeting with the neighbors prior to the hearing. Hopefully, we will be able to address the concerns which were raised about the Playschool Program. Sincerely, ~Manager so/hillsidehrg Mayor William J. Alexander Mayor Pro-Tern Rex Gutierrez JaCK Lam, AICP, City Manager . Councilmember Paul Biane Councilmember James V. Curatalo Councilmember Diane Willjams 10500 Civic Center Drive · P.O. Box 807 * Rancho Cucamonga. CA 91729 · (909) 989-1851 · FAX (909) 987-6499 T H E C ~ T Y O F ANCHO CUCAMONC A August 3, 1995 RECEIVED Tsaqi-Tsong Lin 320 E Rodell Place Arcadia, CA 91006 City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division Dear Mr. Lin: Recently, you were sent a notice of a public hearing regarding a proposed rental agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Hillside Community Church. At the hearing on July 25, we received input from several residents who had questions or expressed concerns about the arrangement. The City of Rancho Cucamonga is requesting temporary use of five classrooms and a small fenced in grass area directly adjacent to the classrooms at Hillside Community Church until our community centers are renovated. The program that will be housed at the church is the Playschool program, a recreational program for children ages one to five. This is not a day care program, classes meet for as little as 50 minutes once a week, up to two hours per day, four days per week. Class times are staggered to conla'ol traffic and congestion. Classes begin at 8:45 a.m. and end by 2:00 p.m. Parents sign up for the program that starts in September and stay in until June, so it is possible for us to control their access and lighten their impact upon the surrounding area. This program is sponsored by the City and is not affiliated with the church. I have attached some details about the program, including the types of classes offered, the background of our search for suitable facilities and the dates and times of oar usage. I hope that you will read the enclosed information and call with any concerns that you may have. You may contact Kathy Sorensen, the Recreation Superintendent at 989-1858 extension 2110 or Nellie Nielsen, the Recreation Supervisor at extension 2104. We hope to work together with the church and the community to make this arrangement a success. Sincerely, SuTarwle Ota Community Services Manager Mayor William J. Alexander Mayor Pro-Tern r~ex Gufierrez Jack Lain, AICR Cit,/Manager A Councilmember Paul Blane Councilmember James V. Curatalo Councilmember Diane Willlares 10500 Civic Center Ddve · P.O. BOx 807 · Rancho Cucamonga. CA 91729 · (90g) 989-1851 · FAX (909) 987-6499 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT PLAYSCHOOL PROGRAM Program Background/Description The City of Rancho Cu, camonga Community Services Department has been offering classes for pre- schoolers since 1977. Over the past five years the Playschool program has grown to over 30 classes (accommodating about 500 children) at three sites, the Lions Park Community Center, Rancho Cucamonga Neighborhood Center and the former Ruth Musser Middle School. We have a reputation for providing a high quality program, with high quality staff, at an affordable price. Because of the demand for our program, we have long waiting lists for most of our classes. We currently offer the following classes: One-derful Ones Terrific Twos Terrific Twos II Thrilling Threes Fabulous 4's & 5's A Fabulous 4's & 5's B School Days For one year olds and a parent For two year olds For two and a half year olds For three year olds For four and five year olda For four and five year olds For four and five year olds Meets once per week for 50 minutes Meets once per week for 50 minutes Meets twice per week for 50 minutes Meets twice per week for 1 hr., 50 re_in. Meets twice per week for 1 hr., 50rain. Meets twice per week for 2 hr., 50 g Meets four days per week, 2-3 hrs./day. These are non-licensed recreational classes designed to enhance a child's self-esteem and socialization skills. We use trained and experienced instructors and aids. The staff ratios are as follows: One-derful Ones Terrific Twos I & II Thrilling Threes Fabulous 4's & 5's School Days teacher: 12 students and parents teacher: 12 students teacher & 1 aide: 17 students teacher & I aide: 20 students teacher & I aide: 20 students Loss of Program Space As of June 1995, we will be losing two of our three sites. The portables at the old school site have been sold and will no longer be available for our use. The Rancho Cucamonga Neighborhood Center is being converted to a senior center during the morning and early afternoon hours.,. The City is also in the process of renovating two buidlings at Lions Park, the Lions Park Community Center, and the building that housed the county branch library. These buildings are anticipated to be completed in the Spring of 1997, and will offer the oppommity to move more Playschool classes to these newly renovated facilities. In the meantime, in preparation for the loss of the current classrooms, staff conducted a search for new classroom space. Contact was made with several churches because they often have classroom space that is unused during the week. The classroom spaces at Hillside Community Church ended up being the most feasible based on classroom size and compatible use. Playschool Program Calendar The Playschool calendar year is from September to June each year with one week off at Thanksgiving, two weeks off at Christmas, one week off for spring break and various City holidays. We also offer a summer program during the months of july and August called Play Camp which will not be conducted at Hillside Community Church. Classrooms to be Rented At Hillside Church We are primarily interested in five (5) classrooms that could accommodate 12 -20 children. We also will have access to bathrooms for the children and a small fenced in grass area. Dates of Usage The program begins Monday, September 18, 1995. We would request at least one week prior to the program start date to bring in supplies. The program ends Friday, June 8, 1996. We would not use the facility for the remainder of June, July, and August, and would resume use when classes began on September 16, 1996. Use is expected to continue until beth of the City facilities at Lions Park are renovated. Expected completion date is Spring of 1997. Days/Times of Usage Mondays through Thursdays Fridays 8:30 a.m. - 2:00 p.m. Cleaning staff only Class times are staggered to reduce the flow of traffic. Parents will be directed to enter the church off Haven Avenue, to reduce the impact to the residential area. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIVIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: August 23, 1995 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Dan Coleman, Principai Planner CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 95-21 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - An appeai of a request to operate a playschool program for approximately 150 preschool children within the existing classrooms of Hillside Community Church, in the Very Low Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units per acre), located at 5354 Haven Avenue - APN: 1074-271-01 BACKGROUND: Following a public hearing on July 25, the project was conditionally approved by the Acting City Planner. The approval was timely appealed by area residents (Exhibit "A"). APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: Preschools and daycare facilities are allowed within all residential zones subject to the granting of a Conditional Use Permit became of their unique operating characteristics. Preschools are allowed within residential neighborhoods in order to provide convenient child care oppommities. ANALYSIS: General: The City ofRancho Cucamonga's Community Services Department proposes to lease five of the portable classrooms from the church (see City Planner Staff Report, Exhibit "B"). The classrooms will be used to offer its Playschool Program similar to those currently offered at Lions Community Center. This request was necessitated by the City's loss of two portable classrooms at the Old Ruth Musser Middle School site, the relocation of one classroom from the Rancho Cueamonga Neighborhood Center, and the need to provide classes to reduce the waiting list for the program. The temporary lease would be for approximately 18 months pending renovation of the Lions East (Old County Library) and existing Lions Community Center facilities. The Playschool Program is structured with youth educational classes for 1 to 5 year-old children. The classes meet at various times on different days, Mondays through Thursdays, for approximately I to 2 hours (see Exhibit "I"). The City anticipates enrollment of up to 150 children; however, the total number of children on the property at any time would not exceed 83 because of the staggered class schedules. ITEM A PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 95-21 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA August 23, 1995 Page 2 Land Use Compatibility: The proposed use would be similar to the existing church functions in these buildings as Sunday school classrooms. The difference would be that the use would operate on weekdays and increase the number of preschool age children. However, the total number of children would not be greater than the intensity of the primary church use. The church is already approved for a preschool of up to 120 children (see Planning Commission Resolution No. 83-18, Exhibit "H"). However, the church never began the preschool use. The outdoor playground area is adequately buffered from neighbors by its location interior to the church property, existing buildings, landscaping, and slopes. There are several preschools within single family residential neighborhoods, including some located on church property, which have successfully operated for years without complaints from neighbors. Therefore, staff does not anticipate any compatibility issues with the primary church use or the surrounding neighborhood. Traffic: A primary concern of the surrounding residents is the potential increase in vehicle trips and speeding on Haven Avenue and Vista Grove Street. The residents believe that traffic flow is already congested with traffic traveling at excessive speeds. Because of the church's location towards the northerly end of Haven Avenue, both Haven Avenue and Vista Grove Street serve local resident traffic. Vista Grove Street is a through street connecting Haven with Hermosa Avenues and is primary access for only about 30 homes on the north side. Other homes in the area have more direct access to other streets. Existing traffic volumes are low compared to other areas of Alta Loma because of the site location near the top of Haven Avenue. Staff finds that the trips generated by this use will be spread throughout the day because of the schedule of classes thus reducing the perceived impact of additional cars. Both streets are fully improved and capable of supporting the increase in traffic associated with this request. Although the issue of existing speeding is not related to this application, the concern has been forwarded to the Traffic Division for investigation. The City Traffic Engineer's report is attached (see Exhibit "J"). ~ Ample parking exists on the site for the proposed use. There are approximately 100 parking spaces located next to the classrooms. Environmental Assessment: The application is exempt per Section 15301 of the Califomia Environmental Quality Act. CORRESPONDENCE: This public hearing item was advertised in the Inland Valley Dally Bulletin newspaper, and the property has been posted. In addition, public heating notices were mailed to an expanded notification area using a 600 foot radius (Exhibit "G"). Several letters and petitions were received from surrounding residents opposing the proposed use (Exhibit "E" & "F"). Information packets were mailed by Community Services to all property owners within 300 feet of the proposed site. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 95-21 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA August 23, 1995 Page 3 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends denial of the appeal through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions. Respectfully submitted, Principal Planner DC:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Exhibit "B" - Exhibit "C" - Exhibit "D" Exhibit "E" Exhibit "F" - Exhibit "G" Exhibit "H" Exhibit 'T' Exhibit "J" Appeal letter Staff Report dated July 25, 1995 City Planner Resolution No. 95-15 Draft City Planner Minutes dated July 25, 1995 Correspondence Neighborhood Petitions Notification Map for August 23, 1995, hearing Planning Commission Resolution No. 83-18 Proposed Class Schedule Traffic Analysis Resolution of Approval with conditions Douglas D. and Cynthia B. Warner 5291 Ozark Mountain Place Alta Loma, CA 91737-6828 August 7, 1995 RECEIVED Planning Division Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA AUG 0 7 1995 City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division Anention: Rancho Cucamonga City Planner Re: Conditional Use Permit 95-21 This letter represents our formal appeal opposing the proposed playschool program at Hillside Church located at 8455 Hillside Road, Alta Loma. The following outlines our immediate concerns: · Increased traffic flow on Haven and Vista Grove. This community is already congested with traffic driving at excessive speed, creating a dangerous environment for our children. Although currently presented as a temporary need, up to two years with five years of renewal, there are no definite answers as to what might happen at the expiration of this permit. As residents, we have moved to this area in search of more open space and quieter setting. To achieve this, we spent a considerable amount of our earnings for our homes and large spacious lots. This section of the city wasn't developed for a public day care center(s). This is not a church program managed at a small level acting to support our immediate community. This is a program offered to up to 150 children and to the entire city of Rancho Cucamonga. What will the number be in the near and distant future? Is this daycare only the start of the next growth phase of the Church? Although meetings have taken place between city officials and Hillside Community Church, and an agreement made, the City nor the Church saw the need or benefit in contacting local residents for our receptivity. Residents were sent a notice in the mail providing very little detail, advising if we have concerns or questions to show up at a meeting held at 2:00 in the alternoon. There was a very low attendance due to the fact that most residents were unaware of the meeting and/or unable to attend because of conflicting work schedules. Page 2 This formal appeal is to ensure local residents have an opportunity to have our questions and concerns addressed. Attached are several pages with signatures of local residents supporting one or all, but not limited to the questions and concerns as described in this letter. We look forward to a formal public hearing to be held in the evening when more residents are able to attend. Please respond by phone or in writing to Doug and Cynthia Warner at (909)989-1020 (address on page one). Thank you for your consideration. Dougla~.~'d Cynthia B. Wamer Concerned Residents CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIVlONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: BY: SUBJECT: July 25, 1995 Dan Coleman, Acting City Planner Steve Ross, Planner CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 95-21 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to operate a playschool program for approximately 150 preschool children within the existing classrooms of Hillside Community Church, in the Very Low Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units per acre), located at 5354 Haven Avenue - APN: 1074-271-01 ANALYSIS: General: The City of Rancho Cucamonga's Community Services Department proposes to lease five of the portable classrooms from the church (see Exhibit "B"). The classrooms will be used to offer its Playschool Program similar to those currently offered at Lions Community Center. The temporary lease would be for approximately 18 months pending renovation of the Lions East (Old County Library) and existing Lions Community Center facilities. The Playschool Program is structured with youth educational classes for 1 to 5 year- old children (see Exhibit "C"). The classes meet Mondays through Thursdays, approximately 1 to 2 hours. This request was necessitated by the City's loss of two portable classrooms at the Old Ruth Musser Middle School site, the relocation of one classroom from the Rancho Cucamonga Neighborhood Center, and the need to provide classes to reduce the waiting list for the program, Land Use Compatibility: The proposed use would be similar to the existing church functions in these buildings as Sunday school classrooms. The difference would be that the use would operate on weekdays and increase the number of preschool age children. However, the total number of children would not be greater than the intensity of the primary church use. Therefore, staff does not anticipate any compatibility issues with the primary church use or the surrounding neighborhood. CITY PLANNER STAFF REPORT CUP 95-21 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA July 25, 1995 Page 2 Parking: Ample parking exists on the site for the proposed use. There are approximately 100 parking spaces located next to the classrooms. Environmental Assessment: The application is exempt per Section 15301 of the California Environmental Quality Act. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions. Respectfully submitted, Steve Ross Planner SR:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Description of Use Resolution of Approval with Conditions Public Information City of Rancho Cucamonga I ~ ' ---- 5554 Haven ParCel c.~,) ~ 107427101 -- / 0 parcels N _.1 500 1000 Feet L ~LJ L_/ J CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT PROPOSED CITY PLAYSCHOOL PROGRAM AT HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH PART I Introduction The City of Rancho Cucamonga has offered classes for pre-schoolers in the Terra Vista area at the former Ruth Musser Middle School. The current site is on Terra Vista Parkway, adjacent to Coyote Canyon Park. We will be losing this site in June and are interested in relocating our classes. The Terra Vista site currently accommodates approximately 100 children and is in need of expansion. We feel that the classrooms located at the Hillside Community Church would be an ideal site due to the location and classroom arrangement. The following is an outline of the Playschool program proposed at the Church utilizing five (5) portable classrooms. Background on the Playschool Program The City ofRancho Cucamonga Community Services DeparUnent has been offering classes for pre- schoolers since 1977. Over the past five years the Playschool program has grown to over 500 children at three sties. We have long waiting lists for most of our classes. We currently offer the following classes: One-derful Ones Terrific Twos Terrific Twos II Thrilling Threes Fabulous 4's & 5's A Fabulous 4's & 5's B School Days For one year olds and a parent For two year olds For two and a half year olds For three year olds For four and five year olds For four and five year olds For four and five year olds Meets once per week for 50 minutes Meets once per week for 50 minutes Meets twice per week for 50 minutes Meets twice per week for 1 hr., 50 min. Meets twice per week for 1 hr., 50 rain. Meets twice per week for 2 hr., 50 min. Meets four days per week, 2-3 hrs./day. These are non-licensed recreational classes designed to enhance a child's self-esteem and socialization skills. We use trained and experienced instructors and aids. The staff ratios are as follows: One-derful Ones Terrific Twos I & II Thrilling Threes Fabulous 4's & 5's School Days School Days I teacher: 12 students and parents 1 teacher: 12 students I teacher & 1 aide: 17 students 1 teacher & 1 aide: 20 students I teacher & 1 aide: 20 students or 1 teacher: 12 students Playschool Program Calendar The Playschool calendar year is from September to June each year with one week off at Thanksgiving, two weeks off at Christmas, one week off for spring break and various City holidays. We also offer a summer program during the months of July and August called Play Camp. Proposed City Playschool Program Page 2 Classrooms to be Rented We are primarily interested in five (5) classrooms that could accommodate 12 -20 children. We also need access to bathrooms for the children and sink areas for classroom cleanup, etc. Dates of Usage The program begins Monday, September 18, 1995. We would request at least one week prior to the program start date to bring in supplies. The program ends Friday, June 8, 1996. Summer usage would depend upon the availability of the facility during the months of July and August. Days/Times of Usage Mondays through Thursdays Fridays (optional) 8:00 a.m. - 2:00 p.m. 8:00 a.m. - 2:00 p.m. Phone Service For the safety of the children and the convenience for our parents, we would like to request permission to install a phone line (at our expense) in one of the classrooms. Maintenance Typically our staff vacuums and cleans their rooms after each class. They also clean tables and chairs if necessary and put away supplies. We would want the rooms clean and ready to use on Monday momings. We would have to discuss bathroom maintenance. We would supply some paper products for the restrooms. Storage We would like to place locking storage containers (2 per classroom) inside the classroom for art and other supplies. We would offer to share tables and chairs and other toys we may have that will not be locked up. Rental Fee The City proposes to pay for five (5) classroom spaces requested on an annual basis, however, the rental fee can be paid monthly or quarterly, whichever is preferred. The amount can be negotiated once we determine what areas are available to use. Due to the difficulty in calculating utility costs, we would like the rental fee to include all utilities except phone service. Benefits We feel that this arrangement can be beneficial to both parties. For the City, it allows us to continue our successful program and accommodate the need in the community. For Hillside Community Church, it would provide additional revenues and exposure for the organization. /4 ll RESOLUTION NO. 95-15 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNER OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 95-21 FOR A PLAYSCHOOL PROGRAM, LOCATED AT 5354 HAVEN AVENUE IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF- APN: 1074- 271-01 A. Recitals. 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit No. 95-21, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 25th day of July 1995, the City Planner of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public headng on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Planner of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. The City Plahner hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to the City Planner dudng the above- referenced public hearing on July 25, 1995, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, the City Planner hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located at 5354 Haven Avenue which is presently improved with a church, including portable classrooms and related parking; and b. The property to the north, south, east, and west is zoned Very Low Residential District and is developed with single family residences; and c. The application contemplates the operation by the City of a Playschool Program for approximately 150 preschool children, within existing portable classroom facilities, on weekdays between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 2:00 p.m. CITY PLANNER RESOLUTION NO. 95-15 CUP 95-21 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA July 25, 1995 Page 2 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to the City Planner during the above-referenced public hearing, and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2 above, the City Planner hereby finds and concludes as follows: a, The proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and b. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and c. The application, which contemplates operation of the proposed use, complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. 4. The City Planner hereby finds and determines that the project identified in this Resolution is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15301 of the State CEQA Guidelines. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, the City Planner hereby approves the application, subject to each and every condition set forth below: Planninq Division 1) Approval shall expire, unless extended by the City Planner, if approved use has not commenced within 24 months of this date. 2) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State F re Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances. 3) If operation of the facility causes adverse effects upon adjacent businesses or operations, the Conditional Use Permit shall be brought before the City Planner for consideration and possible termination of the use. 4) The facility shall be operated in conformance with the performance standards as defined in the Development Code including, but not limited to, noise levels. 5) Any signs proposed for the facility shall be designed in conformance with the City's Sign Ordinance and shall require review and approval by the City Planner prior to installation. 6) Approval is granted for a preschool Playschool Program, Mondays through Thursdays (Fridays optional) from 8:00 a.m. until 2:00 p.m. CITY PLANNER RESOLUTION NO. 95-15 CUP 95-21 * CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA July 25, 1995 Page 3 6. The Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF JULY 1995. BY: ~ne ~' r A'I'FEST: ~re , Secretary I, Shelley A. Petrelli, Secretary to the Planning Division for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the City Planner of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a.regular meeting of the City Planner held on the 25th day of July 1995. DRAFT- FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Ce CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 95-21 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to operate a playschool program for approximately 150 preschool children within the existing classrooms of Hillside Community Chumh, in the Very Low Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units per acre), located at 5354 Haven Avenue - APN: 1074-271 - 01. Brad Buller, City Planner, announced that he was a member of Hillside Community Church and would step out of the room during the public hearing for this item. Nancy Fong, Senior Planner, presented the staff report. Dan Coleman, Principal Planner, asked the Commun ty Services staff for an explanation of how this request came about. Kathy Sorensen, Recreation Superintendent, stated that Community Services was experiencing difficulty obtaining space for one of their large preschool programs because the three main City-owned facilities, where classes are held, are either undergoing renovation or due for renovation in the next several months (the Lions Center is due for renovation in the next 18 months; the old County Library building has been turned over to the City, but won't be available for 12 months; and the Neighborhood Center has been undergoing Block Grant renovations for the last few months). She stated that the school facilities that have been used in the past were only supplemental to the City-owned facilities and they were surplus space to the schools. She stated that the City had been able to use portable buildings, forreedy used for kindergarten at Coyote Canyon Elementary, because when Ruth Musser Middle School took over the elementary school building, they did not use the portables. She further stated that the school district and the City had a joint use agreement, which has reverted back to Lewis Homes, and now those portables are to be sold to Fontana School District. She said the City does not own any land to put portables on, nor does it have funds to construct any portables, leaving the City with the option of using commercial property for classes. She stated that them were discussions with Lewis Homes, but their land uses were not compatible with the vacancies they had available for the City's program. She went on to say that left the City with two options: to use church facilities or cancel the program (which has a large waiting list). She said that letters were sent out to local churches and Hillside Church responded. She commented that when she inspected the facility, it seemed to be the least likely to be impacted, of the five to six churches they checked, as far as not interfering with other commercial uses, offsite parking and portables, and good access. CITY PLANNER MINUTES - 2 - JULY 25,1995 DRAFT- FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Dan Coleman, Principal Planner, stated that he understood there were about 500 children enrolled in the program citywide, with an extensive waiting list. Ms. Sorensen responded affirmatively. Mr. Coleman asked if the church site would house only the 150 children that were previously at the Terra Vista School site. Ms. Sorensen replied it would be for those children and the children previously at the Neighborhood Center. Mr. Coleman asked if the church facility would only be needed for approximately 18 months. Ms. Sorensen responded affirmatively. Mr. Coleman asked what the sign-in policy was for the children when they arrived. Nettle Nielsen, Recreation Supervisor, responded that the parent or guardian signs in the child. Mr. Coleman asked if the classes were from 8:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m., with one class taking place after the previous class let out. Ms. Nellsen stated that was correct. Mr. Coleman asked if, there were ever 150 children present at one time during the five ClaSS SeSSiOnS. Ms. Nielsen responded that the schedule varied, but generally there could be three or four classes at one time with 12 to 20 students each. Mr. Coleman asked if car pooling was a common practice among the parents or caretakers who drove the children. Ms. Nielsen stated that does happen after parents get to know each other, but it does have to be verified with the instructor that this is permissible with the child's parents. Mr. Coleman opened the public hearing. CITY PLANNER MINUTES - 3 - JULY 25, 1995 DRAFT- FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Doug Warner, 5291 Ozark Mountain, stated his house was immediately north of the church and asked if staff visited any of the residents in the area when they visited the church site. Ms. Sorensen replied negatively. Mr. Warner asked why the residents had not been contacted. Ms. Sorensen stated that this was the first time the City had to go to out to this type of facility and, because of the age of the children and the fact that they are inside most of the time, staff did not feel this would impact the neighborhood. Mr. Warner stated he felt that, after staff found a church that was responsive, a neighborhood meeting should have been held. Mr. Coleman stated the City solicits public comment by sending notices to the surrounding properties, within 300 feet of the site, and also by holding a public hearing on the proposed project. Mr. Warner stated that they have experienced numerous problems since the church was built. He stated he had bought a house in that area for privacy, large lot sizes, and the quiet, traffic-free environment. He commented that since the chumh was built, traffic had increased considerably, mainly on weekends, but also during the week. He stated that during the late afternoon and evening hours, teenagers are speeding in the neighborhood, coming into the parking lot of the church and ddnking beer, playing loud music, and leaving trash in the lot. He stated he did not want the additional traffic this program would bring; even if the traffic were to come in below where he lives. He asked where the traffic was supposed to enter the church for the program. Mr. Coleman stated parents would be using the lot along Haven. Mr. Warner stated his certainty that drivers would be exiting from the north side as it is an open parking lot from Haven through Vista Grove. He commented he had small children riding bikes each day, and he reiterated, he did not want the extra traffic. He stated that the program is supposed to last 18 months, but there is no guarantee that it won't be extended beyond that because of additional budget constraints and/or overflow needs. He asked if the children participated in outside activity. Ms. Sorensen responded affirmatively. CITY PLANNER MINUTES - 4 - JULY 25, 1995 DRAFT- FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Mr. Warner stated that concerned him for a number of reasons. He asked what other churches were checked out for the program. Ms. Sorensen responded that Water of Life, New Hope, Northkirk, and several others. Mr. Warner asked if any of those churches were receptive and/or acceptable. Ms. Sorensen responded that some churches were receptive, but were not acceptable because of their location or the size of their available rooms. Mr. Warner asked what church would be a second choice, or if there was one. Ms. Sorensen responded at this point there was not a second choice that staff had any extensive contact with, as Hillside Church was responsive and also a good facility for the program. She stated that staff had negotiated with Water of Life Church and Lewis Homes for approximately four months without success because of compatibility issues in the commercial business area. She stated that Water of Life had been the first choice and with it not being a compatible use, Hillside Church was the next choice. Mr. Warner stated he had spoken to several people in the neighborhood and no one felt comfortable about the situation. He stated his wife had written a letter and was having it signed by the concerned residents and asked who they should give the letter to and what the deadline was. Mr. Coleman stated it should be submitted at this public hearing today to be considered part of the evidentiary record. Mr. Warner stated that his public hearing notice indicated that interested residents could contact City staff Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.., and that was what they were going by. Mr. Coleman stated that if it was submitted after the hearing it would be considered after the fact. He asked if he could make a copy of the letter now. Mr. Warner replied he did not have it with him as it was still being circulated for signatures. He asked if he did not present the letter now, if it would be considered. CITY PLANNER MINUTES - 5 - JULY 25, 1995 DRAFT- FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Mr. Coleman stated that if a decision was reached today, that decision would be appealable to the Planning Commission. Mr. Warner asked if that meeting was in the evening. He stated that was another concern because it was hard for neighbors to take off work for a daytime meeting. Mr. Coleman responded affirmatively. Mr. Warner stated he would bring in the letter when it was ready. He stated that he understood the City's concerns for the program and that options were limited for the classes, but he stated he was concerned for his neighborhood and that he would like to see the program canceled until the City facilities are ready for use. Ms. Rebeca Alanis, 5270 Ozark Mountain Place, stated that she was also concerned with increased traffic and the teenagers hanging around in the parking lot. She reiterated that they had paid quite a bit of money for their houses and did not expect the kind of problems that have been associated with the church. She commented that the afternoon meeting made it difficult for people to attend. Mr. Coleman responded that was one reason notices were sent out, to let people know they could also write or call with questions or concerns. Ms, Barbara Langon, 10516 Silver Spur, stated that she did not understand from the notice that this would be a temporary situation, but she was also concerned about the increased traffic. Mr. Warner asked what type of guarantees would be put into place to ensure that this would be a temporary situation if the project were approved, appealed, and the appeal was denied. Mr. Coleman then closed the public hearing. He mentioned he had received a letter from another resident concerning the potential to increase traffic and then summarized the concems for the surroundings residents as follows: 1) traffic increase; 2) problems with teenagers drinking and littering the existing north parking lot by Vista Grove; 3) drivers speeding on Vista Grove; 4) time limits placed on the project and the potential to extend those limits and what mechanism would be placed to guarantee that this program would be operated in such a way that it would not be a detriment to surrounding neighbors. CITY PLANNER MINUTES -6- JULY 25, 1995 DRAFT- FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Mr. Coleman also stated, with regard to a potential for increased traffic, that traffic would increase to some degree on Haven and Vista Grove. He stated he did not have specific information regarding where people would be coming from, but he stated he assumed they would be traveling from all over the City and he noted for the record, that Haven Avenue is a major arterial street, fully improved with four lanes, and Vista Grove is a fully improved street across the frontage of the church property. He commented the concerns he heard regarding teenagers drinking and littering in the parking lot was an existing problem, unrelated to this request, that needed to be addressed directly with the church. He commented it was unfortunate that a church representative was not present at the hearing to address concerns, but he commented residents' concerns would be passed along to the church by City staff, as well as expressing the City's concern with these situations. He stated that if the problem is a severe one, more drastic measures could be taken, such as installing gates on the parking lot. He commented that the program could be extended beyond the 18 months, at one-year increments, to a maximum of five years from the original approval, and the original approval would be for two years. He said, in regard to assurances that the program would not be extended beyond the original time frame, that if the Conditional Use Permit was granted and problems arose later, it could be reviewed and another public hearing held by the City Planner (with additional testimony), and additional modifications could be made to the original Conditions of Approval. He stated he could not respond to the issue of speeding along Vista Grove and that concern should be addressed directly with the Police Department. He said staff would mention to the church the concerns regarding speeding so they could pass that along to their members. Mr. Coleman approved Conditional Use Permit 95-21 and explained the appeal process to those present. Mr. Warner asked what the appeal fee was and where the appeal was to be sent. Mr. Coleman replied that a $62 check should be made out and sent to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, attention of the Planning Commission Secretary, within 10 days from the date of this meeting. CITY PLANNER MINUTES - 7 - JULY 25, 1995 July 21, 1995 Planning Division City ofKancho Cucarnonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91729 RECEIVED JUL 3 4 1995 City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division Re: Conditional Use Permit 95-21 Attention: Kancho Cucamonga City Planner This letter is in response to the conditional use permit request fbr the 150 child preschool program to be located at the Hillside Chumh on Haven Avenue. First, we are residents ofRancho Cucamonga (north of the Hillside Church off Vista Grove) and have enjoyed the tranquil, quiet lifestyle that this community provides its residents. We chose this community specifically for the atmosphere, scenic beauty and peaceful surroundings. We are just two residents ofRancho Cucamonga. We're not speaking for a group nor do we feel we may be in the majority on this issue, but our hope is that our voice may speak for many who remain silent. We are a~ainst the ~ronosed olavschool nro~ram at the Hillside Church. We realize that the City Planner may receive many letters of support from the members of the church that requested the permit. Hopefully, this letter in some small way will be weighed with the concerns of what makes a residential community a g~eat place to live. It's not by adding businesses to a residential neighborhood. This preschool is a business and will add traffic and employees to the church. The community is already congested with traffic that additional businesses will only complicate. Haven avenue already has three churches within one mile and each has grown over the years but each church is somewhat "land-locked" by residential homes. The Hillside church is no exception. The increase in membership is great for the church but we believe that the chumh planning process has not had the foresight to keep up with the growth. The recent new construction at Hillside Church has created traffic congestion every Sunday. The parking is inadequate, the members park on side streets. Adding a preschool may increase the membership due to the added services of the church but where will the new members park. Will this require more construction for new buildings? Construction of multi-story or high profile buildings and/or creative buildings i.e. churches should be absolutely restricted in a residential area. This blocks scenic views and reduces property values and lifestyle enjoyment. Our concern is that this preschool request is only the start of the next growth phase of the church. In summary, we hope the City Planners make the decision on the general lifestyle and restrict the growth of businesses in residential areas. We are strongly against the preschool at Hillside Church. SincerelYCC,~ Robert and Deborah Simon Concerned Residents '' / City. Planner C/O Mr. Steve Ross Planning Division City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Raneho Cucamonga, CA 91729 RECEIVED JUL ~ 5 1995 Ci{y o1 Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division RE: Proposal for Conditional Use Permit 95-21 - City of Rancho Cucamonga to develop a day care center at Hillside Community Church, located at 5354 Haven Ave., Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91737 Dear Sirs: I will be unable to attend the meeting slated for July, 25, 1995 to consider the above referenced project I would like to have this letter read as a protest to this project being allowed to be permitted.. My residence is within 300 feet of the proposed project Currently, North Haven Avenue, in the vicinity of the proposed project, is a heavily driven area, with a great deal of traffic in and out of the area both in the morning and evening. The majority of the traffic on Haven Avenue is from residents, building contractors, concrete and dump trucks, lawn maintenance people and students attending Chaffey College. Consequently, there is a great deal noise from vehicle traffic in an area that was originally designed by the city as a very low residence area. Because of the steep incline of Haven Avenue, there is an ever-present danger from speeding vehicles. Currently there no traffic control lights in ~e area (only stop signs), and numerous traffic accidents have occurred and are an ever-present danger at the intersections of Haven at Hillside Road and Haven at Wilson Road. Entrance in and out of this area is limited at best The addition of possibly over 100 additional vehicles in the heavy traffic hours of morning and evening would only compound the traffic and noise problem in this area. With the great deal of traffic in this area, especially during the weekday morning and afternoon hours, there would also be a danger to the children being dropped-off and picked-up. I realize that there may be a need for a day-care to help members of the church who work, but the church should also be considerate to the neighbors in the area of where their church is located. P.O. Box 1224 Alto Loma, CA 91701 (909) 989-1554 NAME SIGNATURE ADDRESS PH.# DATE ~7,~v o~k Mn. qgq-o5H,4 7fii f~ /t ,I tI ,~ 2/s r / fS- (/,Hle, n' "P" ZONE,XLS 7,05 AM 8/2195 PETITION TO REJECT PERMIT AT HILLSIDE CHURCH LN PRINTED NAME SIGN TURE ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 ZONE.XLS 7:O6 AM 8/2/96 PETITION TO REJECT PERMIT AT HILLSIDE CHURCH 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 City of Rancho Cucamonga CHURCH NOTICE AREA PARCELS Public Information 0 480 960 Feet N A RESOLUTION NO. 83-18 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONC~A PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 82-29 FOR HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF hU~VEN AVENUE, BETWEEN HILLSIDE ROAD AND CARP~RI STREET IN THE R-1-20,000 ZONE WHEREAS, on the lOth day of December, 1982, a complete application was filed by Hillside Community Church for review of the above-described project; and Planning project. WHER~S, on the 9th day of February, 1983, the Rancho Cucamonga Commission held a public hearing to consider the above-described NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as follows: SECTION 1: That the following findings can be met: That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, and the purposes of the zone in which the use is proposed; and That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and That the proposed use will comply with each of the applicabl~ provisions of the Zoning Ordinance. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and that a Negative Declaration is issued on February g, lg83. SECTION 3: That Conditional Use Permit No. 82-2g is approved subject to the following conditions and attached standard conditions: PLANNING DIVISION The final location and height of all retaining walls shall be subject to review and approval by the City Planner prior to issuance of any grading permit. Retaining walls higher than 4' may require special design features and shrub planting in front of the wall to reduce the visual impact. Resolution No. 83-18 Page 2 A trail connection shall be'provided from the west property line to the community trail on Haven Avenue. The final design and location shall be determined by the City Planner. Said details shall be accomplished prior to issuance of grading or building permits. The circulation aisle on the east side of the sanctuary shall be reduced in width to 20' except in those areas where additional width is necessary for proper turning radius and maneuverabilfty. The temporary relocatable buildings are approved and shall be removed within two years from issuance of building permits, or shall be removed from the site upon occupancy of Phase II, whichever occurs first, unless extended by the Planning Conmnission. 5. Building permits shall be issued for Phase I within eighteen months from Planning Commission approval, or the CUP shall become null and void. All laws and regulations of the State Department of Social Services relating to licensing of children's day care facilities shall be complied with prior to opening of the school. 7. Expansion of the preschool beyond 120 students will require the approval of a modified conditional use permit. 8. If the operation of this school causes adverse effects upon adjacent properties, the Conditional Use Permit shall be brought before the Planning Commission for their consideration and possible termination of such use. g. Operation of the preschool shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building'~'~de and Title 19 of the State Fire Marshall's Regulations have been complied with. Plans shall be submitted to the Foothill Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance~ 10. The grass parking area shall be provided with a compacted subsurface adequate to accommodate automobile parking in adverse weather conditions. The final design and details shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Planner and Building Official prior to issuance of a grading or building permit for any portion of Phase II. Resolution No. 83-18 Page 3 ENGINEERING DIVISION 11. The future half-street along the north property line shall be constructed at time of development of project to the west or until construction of either the Sanctuary or Nursery and Christian Education, whichever occurs first. A Lien Agreement shall be executed prior to issuance of building permit to guarantee construction of the street. 12. The entry lane on each drive approach shall be reduced to 15' in width. APPROVED AND. ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1983. PLANNI~G~/M ISSION OF THE ITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the gth day of February, 1983, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: REMPEL, STOUT, BARKER, MCNIEL, KING NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE .f, ctasspLAySCHOOL 1995/96 ROOM SCHEDULE HILLSIDE COMMU~ CH~CH MONDAY ~ESDAY ~D~$DAY ~URSDAY (J Z~,PS2A-003 21 9:10 - 10:00 Vivian Johnson (,z~ PS01-005 (i~)PS2A-004 (.~) PS01-006 Ones 9 - 9:50 21 9:10 - 10:00 Ones 9 - 9:50 No Instructor Vivian Johnson No Instractor ROOM 1 (tt)PS2B-003 211 10:10 - 11:00 Vivian Johnson ~iz)PS2B-004 2II 10 - 10:50 Ci ~.'x, PS2B-003 (I () PS2B-004 21I 10:10 - 11:00 2II 10 - 10:50 Vivlan JohnIon No In~ructor ~2C~) PS4A-603 4/5A 11:30 - 1:20 Vivian Johnson ~Zb~PS4A-003 4/5A 11:30 - 1:20 Vivian Johnson ROOM 2 (2C>)PS4B-004 4/5B 9:00 - 11:50 Cheryl Br~nnnan ( F l) PS3A-005 3A 9:00 - 10:50 Cheryl Brennnan (ao~rs4B-oo,t 4/5B 9:00 - 11:50 Che~yl Brennnan ~ ~)PS3A-005 3A 9:00 - 10:50 Cheryl B~nnnan ROOM 3 (~)P54A-005 4/5A lh00 - 12:50 Cheryl Brennnin 3A&45 - 10:35 3B 9 - 11:50 NicheHe Cask'has (~O,)PS4A-005 4/5A 11:00 - 12:50 Cheryl Brenanan O'~PS3~-~ O~)PSSS-00~ 3A 8:4.6 - 10:35 3B 9 - 11:50 Michel]e Cardthai Michelle Cardena~ ~tlcheHe Carck, nal ~O~P54B-003 4/5B 11 - 1:50 Michelle Carlima, 4/5B 11 - 1:50 l'41ehelle Cardenas ROOM 4 3A 9:30 - 11:20 Co~tney Gibson 6'~PS3A-006 3A 9:30 - 11:20 Courthey Gih~on ROOM 5 ' ~ ~0) PS4A-004 4/5A 11:30 - 1:20 Confinn Gil~son (2o) PS4A-O04 4/5A 11:30 - 1:20 Courthey Gibson CEd]STEP-001 '~ STEP.-001 STEP-001 STEP-001 The Next Step The Next Step The N~xt Step The Next Step 8:46 - 10:35 8:45 - 10:35 8:45 - 10:35 8:45 - 10:35 lse[a Lopes labia Lope: lsela Lapez Isela Lopez ~'ll:P-002 ~ t l:P-002 The Next Step The Next 5re. 10:45 - 12:35 10:46 - 12:35 Isela Lom Isela Lopez ;ZD) STEP-002 ~ STEP-002 The Next Ste~ The Next St~ 10:46 - 12:35 10:45 - 12:35 Ise]a Lopez Isela Lopez FRIDAY r CITY OF RANCH0 CUCAIVlONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: August 15, 1995 Dan Coleman, Principal Planner Paul A. Rougeau, Traffic Engineer APPEAL OF CUP 95-21 - TRAFFIC INFORMATION This CUP is for a play school program in a church on the southwest comer of Haven Avenue and Vista Grove Street. The program will use existing rooms on the south part of the property and access will be via the existing south driveway connecting directly with Haven Avenue. Very few, if any cars will use the driveway onto Vista Grove Street. Haven Avenue in this area carries 4,500 cars per day and is currently unposted for a speed limit (55 maximum). Traffic volume on Vista Grove Street is about 50 during the peak hours; on Vivienda Street peak hour volume is about 10. All of these traffic volumes are very light. There has been one single-car accident reported in the area during the last three years (February 1995). For the proposed program, a staff of eight to ten will arrive at 8:00 a.m. and leave at about 2:00 p.m. On the average day about 84 students will arrive and depart between the same two limes so the total trips produced by the program is about 190 during the six hours. More specifically, for the seven dally classes of one to three hours each, a maximum of 60 arrivals and departures in an hour would be expected. An average number would be less than half of that. Such activity would take place in about a ten minute period, with very few cars present at other times. All this activity will take place during the off peak times, so conflict with Haven Avenue traffic will not occur. During these hours Haven Avenue traffic will be about 280 per hour, half of that, or 140 per hour, going south past the driveway. The volumes of 140 per hour on Haven vs. 25 to 60 from the driveway in a ten minute period could be viewed alternatively as two to three cars per minute on Haven vs. two to six per minute from the driveway. This results in traffic gaps, which will actually be of a random nature, adequate for safe use of the driveway and a good level of service. PAR:Iy cc: Dan James, Sr. Civil Engineer RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 95-21 FOR A PLAYSCHOOL PROGRAM, LOCATED AT 5354 HAVEN AVENUE IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1074-271-01 1. The City of Rancho cucamonga has filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit No. 95-21, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 25th day of July 1995, the City Planner of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and, following the conclusion of that hearing, adopted Resolution No. 95-15 approving the application upon certain stated conditions. 3. The decision represented by said City Planner Resolution was timely appealed to this Planning Commission. 4. On August 23, 1995, this Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said public hearing on that date. 5. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption Of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. The Planning Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to the Planning Commission during the above-referenced August 23, 1995, hearing, including written and oral staff reports, the minutes of the above-referenced City Planner meeting, and the contents of City Planner Resolution No. 95-15, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located at 5354 Haven Avenue which is presently improved with a church, including portable classrooms and related parking, and full street improvements; and b. The subject property was approved in February 1983 for a preschool of up to 120 children in the portable classrooms as part of the original Conditional Use Permit No. 82-29, when this Commission adopted its Resolution No. 83-18; and c. The properties to the north, south, east, and west are zoned Very Low Residential and are developed with single family residences; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 95-21 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA August 23, 1995 Page 2 d. The use proposed in the application is a permitted use in the Very Low Residential District subject to the issuance of a conditional Use Permit; and e. The application complies with all requirements of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and f. The application contemplates the operation by the City of a playschool program for up to 150 preschool children, within existing portable classrooms, on various weekdays between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 2:00 p. m. The total number of children anticipated on the site at any given time would not exceed 83 children because of the staggered class schedules, which is far less than the existing approval for up to 120 preschool children; and g. The use proposed at the application site has been conducted in the City of Rancho Cucamonga for approximately eight years at three locations elsewhere in the community. The Community Services Department, which operates the playschool program, is pursuing the subject property because two of those locations are not available at this time. The application site fulfills the connnunity need to relocate the use for a limited period of time of approximately 18 months until permanent facilities become available; and h. The application applies to property containing existing classroom and playground facilities and parking, which will accommodate the use without further improvements; and i. The applied for use will'be responsive to the demand for preschool programs within the community; and j. There is existing access from a drive approach on Haven Avenue to a 100 car parking lot located directly east of the classrooms, with secondary access from the site's northerly frontage on Vista Grove Street; and k. Existing and projected traffic volumes on Haven Avenue and Vista Grove Street are significantly lower than their design capacity. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to the Planning Commission during the above-referenced public hearing, and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, the Planning Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and b. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and c. The application, which contemplates operation of the proposed use, complies with each of the applicable provisions Of the Development Code. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 95-21 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA August 23, 1995 Page 3 4. The Planning Commission hereby finds and determines that the project identified in this Resolution is categorically exempt from the requirements Of the california Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15301 of the State CEQA Guidelines. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, the Planning commission hereby approves the application, subject to each and every condition set forth below: Planning Division 1) Approval shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, if approved use has not commenced within 24 months of this date. 2) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances. 3) If Operation Of the facility causes adverse effects upon adjacent businesses or operations, the Conditional Use Permit shall be brought before the Planning Commission for consideration and possible termination of the use. 4) The facility shall be operated in conformance with the performance standards as defined in the Development code including, but not limited to, noise levels. 5) Any signs proposed for the facility shall be designed in conformance with the City's Sign Ordinance and shall require review and approval by the City Planner prior to installation. 6) Approval is granted for a preschool Playschool Program, Mondays through Thursdays (Fridays optional) from 8:00 a.m. until 2:00 p.m. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF AUGUST 1995. BY: E. David Barker, Chairman PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 95-21 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA August 23, 1995 Page 4 ATTEST: Brad Bullet, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the city Of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 23rd day of August 1995, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: August 23, 1995 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer Betty A. Miller, Associate Engineer ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 14806 - WESTERN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY - A subdivision of 25 acres of land into 8 parcels in the Community Commercial District of the Terra Vista Community Plan, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard between Spruce and Elm Avenues - APN: 1077-421 - 58 and 63. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. Related files: Conditional Use Permit 93-49 previously approved. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPT/ON: A. Action Requested: Approval of the proposed Tentative Parcel Map as shown on Exhibit "B". Adoption of a Negative Declaration. Parcel I 5.38 acres Parcel 5 2.99 acres Parcel 2 0.39 acres Parcel 6 0.82 acres Parcel 3 4.99 acres Parcel 7 7.23 acres Parcel 4 0.93 acres Parcel 8 2.25 acres Total 24.98 acres C. Existing Zoning: Community Commercial, Terra Vista Planned Community D. Surrounding Land Use: North South East West - Vacant, approved tentative tract and park - Vacant and hotel - Vacant - Terra Vista Town Center E. SurroundingGeneraIPlanandDevelopmentCodeDesignations: North South East West - Medium Residential, Terra Vista Planned Community - Industrial Park, Subarea 7, Industrial Specific Plan - Mixed Use, Terra Vista Planned Community - Community Commercial, Terra Vista Planned Community ITEM B PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 14806 - WESTERN DEVELOPMENT CO. August 23, 1995 Page 2 Site Characteristics: The site has been graded for a shopping center. Parcel 1 is developed; Parcels 3 and 7 are under construction. Perimeter street improvements have been installed, including all project driveways, and parkway improvements are under construction. ANALYSIS: The purpose of this parcel map is to create eight parcels consistent with Conditional Use Permit 93-49 for Town Center Square, which was approved in July of 1994 and modified in January of 1995. It replaces Parcel Map 14331. Best Buy has already opened on Parcel I and Home Express is now open on Parcel 7. Additional construction is underway on parcels 3 and 7. The developer has chosen to make the 60-foot non-buildable easement, which surrounds the in-line major tenants forthe shopping center, contiguous with the existing drive aisle. When a Design Review is processed for satellite buildings on Parcel 5, they will be required to stay outside this easement. Exhibit "C" shows the northeast comer of Building 10 encroaching about 5 feet into the easement, but the building footprint is only conceptual at this time. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The applicant completed Part I of the Initial Study. Staff conducted a field investigation and completed Part II of the Initial Study. No adverse impacts upon the environment are anticipated as a result of this project. Therefore, adoption of a Negative Declaration is appropriate. CORRESPONDENCE: Notices of Public Hearing have been sent to surrounding property owners and placed in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin. Posting at the site has also been completed. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider all input and elements of the Tentative Parcel Map 14806. If after such consideration, the Commission deems approval appropriate, then adoption of the attached Resolution would be in order. Respectfully submitted, Senior Civil Engineer Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Vicinity Map Exhibit "B" - Tentative Map Exhibit "C" - CUP 93-49 Site Plan Resolution and Recommended Conditions of Approval CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA EN(]INEERIN{] DIVISION I I ".,/ODD N PARCEL 7 i~ 911 lel ,e~G,I~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION I "= ZDD ~ N rrBM: PttfeCEL M FtP I~II~0[~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINF, ERING DIVISION N frrl. R: 'n l/P q3-q9 I q~.t3l-, -~tTE RJ~IV RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLy APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NUMBER 14806, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BETWEEN SPRUCE AND ELM AVENUES, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1077-421-58 AND 63 WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 14806, submitted by Western Development Company, applicant, for the purpose Of subdividing into 8 parcels, the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, identified as APNS 1077-421-58 and 63, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard between Spruce and Elm Avenues; and WHEREAS, On August 23, 1995, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing for the above-described map. NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCANONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made: 1. That the map is consistent with the General Plan. 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage or public health problems or. have adverse effects on abutting properties. SECTION 2: Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows: That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application. That, based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAp 14806 August 23, 1995 Page 2 Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. ZE_CJJ~L/: Tentative Parcel Map Number 14806 is hereby approved subject to the attached Standard Conditions and the following Special Conditions: Enoineerinu Division 1. Complete all frontage improvements on Foothill Boulevard, Spruce Avenue, Church Street and Elm Avenue. All street lights along right turn lanes and/or bus bays shall have 8-foot mast arms. 3. Development shall comply with the Tetra Vista Park Implementation Plan. Buildin~ & Safety Division Prior to approval of the final parcel map, the Cc&Rs shall address the following to the satisfaction of the Building Official: a. The Omission of property line wall and opening protection as required for independent buildings, Approval Of buildings affected is based upon the "unlimited area" provisions of the 1991 edition of the Uniform Building Code, Easement restricts expansion of the affected structures, d. The outer easement line is to be considered a property line for adjacent buildings, and e. Easement and CC&R language cannot be changed without approval of the Building Official. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAp 14806 August 23, 1995 Page 3 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF AUGUST 1995. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: E. David Barker, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 23rd day of August 1995, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STANDARD CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. Those items checked are Conditions of Anoroval. A. Dedications and Vehicular Access Rights-of-way and easements shah be dedicated to the City for all interior public su~ets, community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, suet trees, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder Wails, etc.) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. 2. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way for the perimeter sweets (measured from centerline): total feet on total feet on total feet on total feet on An irrevocable offer of dedication for roadway purposes shall be made for the private streets. Comer property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. Vehicular access rights shall be dedicated to the City for the following streets, except for approved openings: Reciprocal access e~em~ ~s~g ~cess m all p~els sh~l be ~corded prior to ~ conc~ent wi~ · e final p~cel map. Reciprocal p~g ~emenB for all p~els ~d ma~ten~ce ~menB ens~g jolt ma~ten~ce of all colon ~, ~ves, or p~g mE shall ~ p~vided by C C & R's or dee~ ~d shall be recorded prior ~ or conc~nt wi~ ~e fmat p~el m~. m 8. All existing easements lying within future right-of-way are to be quitclaimed or delineated on the fmal parcel map per the City Engineer's requirements. 9. Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City. I0. Privatedrainageeasementsf~rcr~ss~~~tdrainageshal~be~mvidedandshal~bede~ineated~rn~ted~nthe final parcel map. 11. Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum of 7 feet measured from the face of curbs. If curb adjacent sidewalk is used along the right turn lane, a parallel street tree easement shall be provided. 1 12. The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property interests necessary to construct the required public improvements and, if he/she should fail to do so, the developer shall at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final parcel map for approval, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code Section 66462 at such time as the City acquires the property interests required for the improvements. Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developer of all costs incurred by the City to acquire the off-site property interests required in connection with the subdivision. Security for a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the developer, at developer's cost. The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal. This condition applies in particular, but not limited, to: B. Street Improvements All public improvements, (interior s~eets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc. ) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be consreacted to City Standards. Interior sweet improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and sueet ~ees. 2. Aminimum, of26-footwide pavement within a 40- foot wide dedicated right-of-way shail beconsmlcted for all half-section streets. 3. Consffuct the following missing perimeter sueet improvements including, but not limited to: Street Name Curb AC & Pvmt Gutter Side- Drive Stlz~t Stseet Cornre. Median Bike Other walk Appr. Lights Trees Trail Island Trail e, / Notes: (a) Median Island includes landscaping and in'igation on meter. (b) Pavement construction and ove~ays will be determined during plan check. (c) Is so marked, sidewalk will be curvilinear per STD. # 114. (d) If so tunated, an in-lieu of consu~ction f~e shall be provided for this item. 2 4. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans including street trees and street lights, prepared by a registered Civil Engineer, shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineei. b. Prior to any work being performed in the public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's office in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic, street name signing, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed on any new construction or reconstruction of major, secondary or collector sweets for future signals. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCIL ECR or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: (I) All pull boxes shall be No. 6 unless offerwise specified by the City Engineer. (2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pullrope. e. Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all comers of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to tnffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. A sweet closure permit may be required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check. 5. Street improvement plans per City Standards for all private sweets shall be provided for review and approval by the City Engineer. Prior to any work being performed on the private streets, fees shall be paid and construction permits shall be obtained from the City Engineers office in addition to any other permits required. 6. Street trees, a minimum of 15 - gallon size or larger shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's sweet tree program. 7. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. On collector or large street, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. 8. A Permit shall be obtained from CA LTRANS for any work within the following right-of-way. 9. All public improvements on the following streets shall be operationally complete prior to the issuance of building permits. 3 ll' C$ Public Maintenance Areas 1. A separate set of landscape and inigation plans per Engineering Publ i~ Works Standards shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to final parcel map approval. The following landscaped parkways, medians, paseos, easements, nails, or other areas shall be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance District: Dm 2. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting DisUicts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final parcel map approval. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 3. All required public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the developer until accepted by the City. 4. Parkway landscaping on the following slnet(s) shall conform to the results of the respective Beautification Master Plan: ~"~T'141L.L. ,~{~.cIFIt_ l:~ '~'~l(.~ ~'pPL~ t4~N'F' Drainage and Flood Control 1. The project (or portions thetoo0 is located within a Flood lJnTard Zone; therefore, flood protection measures shall be provided as certified by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer. 2. It shall be the developers responsibility to have the current FIRM Zone designation removed from the project area. The developer's engineer shall prepare all necessary reports, plans, and hydrologic/hydraulic calculations. A Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) shall be obtained from FEMA, prior to occupancy or improvement acceptance, whichever occurs fu~'t. 3. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to Final parcel map approval. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. 4. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. 5. A penit from the San Bemardino County Flood Control Disuict is required for work within it's fight-of- way. 6. Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured from the outer edge of a mature nee trunk. 7. Public storm drain easements shall be graded to convey overflows in the event of blockage in a sump condition. 4 Improvement Completion 1..4('fi~'required public improvements.,a~-not completed prior to approval of the final parcel map,-a~.- iml~ro,~:-~nt ~ari~,/nc~ompeaied by an a~,e~ilx~..~ ,.,,.,.atcd bz ~,~ D,..,.l'uF~t o~d ,1,~ Cit? .,ill be 2. If ~e requked public ~provemen5 ~e not completed prior to approval of ~e final p~cel map, ~ improvement certificate shall be placed upon ~e F~al Map, stating ~at ~ey will be completed upon developmentfor:~ ~O~6E P~K~ /~P~a~ ~aA~ ~ F, Utilities J 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, elecn-ical power, telephone and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards, Easements shall be provided as required. 2, Water and sewer plans shall be designed and consl~ucted to meet requirements of the Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection DisUict, and the Environmental Health DeparUnent of the County of San Bernardino. 3. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. 4. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. General Requirements and Approvals 1. The tentative map approval is valid for the 24 month period following the approval date. Time extensions may be granted by the Planning Commission, if raquested prior to the expiration date. 2, Final grading plans for each parcel shall be as requind by the Building and Safety Division prior to issuance of grading permits. 3. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (C C & R's) approved by the City Attorney is required prior to approval of the final parcel map. 4. An easement for a joint use driveway shall be provided prior to final parcel map approval for: 5. Prior to approval of the final parcel map a deposit shall be posted with the City coveting the estimated cost of apportioning the assessments under Assessment Disl~ict . among the newly created parcels. 6. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new su'eet lights for the fast 6 months of operation, prior to final parcel map approval. 5 7. Prior to fmalization of any development phase, sufficient improvement plans shall be completed beyond the phase boundaries to assUre secondary access and drainage protection to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Phase boundaries shall correspond to lot lines shown on the approved tentative map. 8. Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Regional Mainline, Secondary Regional, and Master Plan Drainage Fees shall be paid prior to final parcel map approval. 9. Permits shall be obtained ~'om the following agencies for work within their right-of-way. 10. A~ignedc~nsentandwaiverf~rmt~~~inand/~rf~rmtheLawEnf~mementC~mmunityFaci~itiesDistrict shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final parcel map approval. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 11. Prior to mcordation of the final parcel map, the applicant shall consent to, or participate in, the establishment ofa Mello-Roos Community Facilities District for the cons~uction and maintenance of necessary school facilities. However, if any school dislrict has previously established such a Community Facilities Dislrict,.the applicant shall, in the alternative, consent to the annexation of the project site into the ierritory of such existing district prior to the recordation of the final parcel map. Further, if the affected school district has not formed a Mello-Roos Community Facilities Dislrict within twelve months from the date of approval of the project and prior to the recordation of the f'mal parcel map for said project, this condition shall be deemed null and void. This condition shall be waived if the City receives notice that the applicant and all affected school disn'icts have entered into an agreement to privately accommodate any and all school impacts as a result of this project. 12. Mello Roos Community Facilities Disu'ict requirements for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District shall apply to this project. 13. Pursuant to provisions of California Resources Code Section 21089(b), this application shall not he operative, vested or final, nor will building permits be issued or a map recorded, until (I) the Notice of Determination (NOD) regarding the associated environmental action in filed and posted with Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the County of~an Bernardino; and (2) any and all mluired handling charges, are paid to the County Clerk of the County of San Bcmardino. The applicant shall provide the Engineering Department with a stamped and copy of the NOD together with a receipt showing that all fees have been paid. In the event this application is determined exempt from such filing fees pursuant to the provision of the California Code, or the guidelines promulgated thereunder, except for payment of any required handling charge for filing a Certificate of Fee Exemption, this condition shall be deemed null and void. Rev. 8/1/95 6 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIVIONGA ' STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: August 23, 1995 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Steve Hayes, AICP, Associate Planner ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 95-15 - HOBIN - The proposed development of a 75,192 square foot public storage facility with caretaker's residence on 5.48 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 8) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, located on the north side of Arrow Route, east of Rochester Avenue - APN: 229-021-36. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A, Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - South - East - West - Vacant; Industrial Area Specific Plan, Subarea 8 (General Industrial) Office Park; Industrial Area Specific Plan, Subarea 8 (General Industrial) SCE Corridor/Nursery; Industrial Area Specific Plan, Subarea 8 (General Industrial) Vacant; Industrial Area Specific Plan, Subarea 8 (General Industrial ) General Plan Designations: Project Site - General Industrial North - General Industrial South - General Industrial East - General Industrial West - General Industrial Site Characteristics: The site is currently vacant and does not have any structures or significant vegetation. The site slopes gently from north to south and does not have any public improvements completed along the project frontage at this time. 'k, ITEM C PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 95-15-HOBIN August23,1995 Page 2 ANALYSIS: General: The applicant is proposing to develop a 75,192 square foot public storage facility. The facility will contain an office and caretaker's residence in the two-story building along the Arrow Route frontage, near the main entrance. Primary and emergency vehicle access to the site will be from Arrow Route. The perimeter buildings will be single story and take on the appearance of being a decorative block wall from the perimeter. The project takes its architectural cues from the nearby Rancho Cucamonga Sports Complex: simple Stucco arches, accent tile, and gable and hip standing seam metal roofs. Open parking in the middle of the site, behind Building E, is provided for recreational vehicle storage. In the future, another storage building to match the exterior of other buildings on the property may be constructed in this area. A master plan has also been developed for the westerly portion of the parcel. The master plan shows a 14,355 square foot building and related parking facilities, with a shared access to Arrow Route with the adjacent parcel to the west. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee (Lumpp, McNiel, Fong) reviewed the application on July 18, 1995, and recommended approval subject to conditions contained in the attached Design Review Committee Action Comments (see Exhibit "F"). A majodty of the comments have already been incorporated into the revised conceptual plans for Planning Commission review. Those items which have not been completely addressed to the satisfaction of the Planning Division have been incorporated into the attached Resolution of Approval as Conditions of Approval. Technical Review Committee: On July 19 1995, the Committee reviewed the project and determined that, with the recommended standard and special Conditions of Approval, the project is consistent with all applicable standards and ordinances. The project was reviewed and conceptually approved by the Grading Committee on July 18. 1995. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been completed by the applicant. Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study, the Environmental Checklist, and found that, with the recommended Conditions of Approval, there will be no significant adverse environmental impacts as a result of development of this project. If the Commission concurs with staffs findings, then adoption of a Negative Declaration would be in order. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property has been posted, and notices were sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the site. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 95-15-HOBIN August23,1995 Page 3 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Conditional Use Permit 95-15 through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions and issue a Negative Declaration. Respectfully submitted, BB:SH:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Exhibit "B" - Exhibit "C" - Exhibit "D" - EXhibit "E" - Exhibit "F" - Location Map Site Plan Landscape Plan Building Elevations Floor Plans Design Review Committee Action Comments Resolution of Approval with Conditions C3 VACANT STADIUM SELF STORAGE RANCHO CUCAMONGA ARROW ROUE SITEPtAN-SCHEMEH ARROW ROUTE T T SITE PLAN - SCHEME H ell FUTURE PLANT LEGEND PREUMINARY LANDSCAPE BUiLDiNG C ELEVATION OFFICE ELEVAllON . ~ ARROWROUI~m BUILDING ~ ELL~I~ON ~UlLDIN(3 D /,~,.~!.~!.~'AR,~NC,O~P STADIUM SELF STORAGE INTERNAL 0RNE OFFICE ELEVATION MANAGER'S COURI'~RD ELEVATION / BUILDING C ELEVAllON BUILDING C ELEVAllON STADIUM SELF STORAGE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 3A STADIUM SELF STORAGE RANCHOCUCAMONGA, CA MANAGER'$ RPAR'RMENT STADIUM SELF STORAGE RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CA SITE SECTION ~.,,~o. 2 DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 5:40 p.m Steve Hayes July 18, 1995 ENVIRONMF~.NTAI. ASSESSIVfI~.NT AND CONDITIONAl, USE PERMIT 95-15 - HOBIN - The proposed development of a 75,192 square foot public storage facility with caretakers residence on 5.48 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 8) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, located on the north side of Arrow Route, east ofRochester Avenue-APN: 229-021-36. Design Parameters: The site is currently vacant and does not have any structures or significant vegetation. To the north is the parIcing lot expansion for the Quakes baseball stadium, to the south is existing industrial development, and land to the east and west is currently vacant. The site slopes gently from noah to south and does not include any public improvements at this time, Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Maj. or Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project. The exterior design ofthe proposed facility closely matches the exterior treatments used at Quakes Stadium and the Animal Shelter. Given the close proximity of the public storage facility to these buildings, staff feels the material use and design will complement each other. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues. The landscape area on the south side of Building E should be increased in depth to allow for sufficient room for trees to mature. Additional trees should be provided in the benned portion of the s~reetscape area to further screen the parking areas from view. Trees should be provided along the entire len~h of the west property line, including the area slated for a future industrial building. 4. Additional thorny vines should be used on the exposed perimeter walls to discourage graffiti. 5. A cap or fascia element should be provided on the exposed sides of the storage unit buildings. Poli~ Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission polls7 and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion. ' Stucco over wood trim should be provided around all windows exposed to public view on the caretakers residence. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Design Review Committee recorrunend approval of Conditional Use Permit 95-15 with the recommendations contained therein as conditions of approval. C 12 DRC COMMENTS CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 95-15 - HOBIN July 18, 1995 Page 2 Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Heinz Lumpp, Larry McNiel, Nancy Fong Staff Planner: Steve Hayes The Design Review Committee recommended approval of the project subject to the following conditions: 1. Shrub hedgerows and additional vining should be added along the base of the exposed perimeter walls to prevent graffiti. 2. The proposed vine arbors should he composed of a 2-inch thick metal perimeter frame with members on the inside being a minimum of 1-inch thick. 3. The north elevation should be upgraded to include additional articulation, to the satisfaction of th~ Planning Division. 4. All other secondary and policy design issues included in the Design Review Committee Comments should be addressed by the applicant. The Committee recommended that these issues be shown on the revised plans to the satisfaction of the Planning Division. Once addressed, the item can be scheduled for a Planning Commission Public Heating. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCNO CUQAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 95-15 FOR THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF A 75,192 SQUARE FOOT PUBLIC STORAGE FACILITY WITH CARETAKER'S RESIDENCE ON 5.48 ACHES OF LAND IN THE GENER/~L INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 8) OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF ARROW ROUTE, EAST OF ROCHESTER AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 229-021-36. 1. William Hobin of the William Warren Group has filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit No. 95-15, as described in the title Of this Resolution. Nereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 23rd day of August 1995, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on August 23, 1995, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located on the north side of Arrow Route, east of Rochester Avenue, with a street frontage of 684.53 feet along Arrow Route and lot depth of 337.01 feet and is presently unimproved; and b. The property to the north of the subject site is vacant, the property to the south consists of office/industrial buildings, the property to the east is a Southern California Edison transmission corridor with a plant nursery, and the property to the west is vacant; and c. The development of a public storage facility is consistent with the General Industrial designation of the Industrial Area Specific Plan and General Plan; and d. The application contemplates the use of a residence within the proposed development as a caretaker's residence, which is conditionally permitted in the General Industrial District; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 95-15 - HOBIN August 23, 1995 Page 2 e. The application, along with conditions contained in the attached Resolution of Approval, is consistent with all applicable standards of the Development Code and Industrial Area Specific Plan. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. b. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. c. The proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows: a. The Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. Based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur. C. Pursuant to the provisions Of section 753.5(c) Of Title 14 Of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 95-15 - HOBIN AuguSt 23, 1995 Page 3 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Division 1) Shrub hedgerows and additional thorny vines shall be added along the base of all exposed perimeter walls to prevent graffiti, to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 2) The north elevation shall be upgraded with additional articulation, to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 3) The landscape area on the south side of Building E shall be increased in depth to allow for sufficient room for trees to mature, to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 4) Additional trees shall be provided in the bermed portion of the streetscape area to better screen the parking areas from view, to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 5) Trees shall be provided along the entire length of the west side of Building B at a minimum ratio of one tree per 30 linear feet of building, to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 6) A cap or fascia element shall be provided on the exposed sides of the storage unit buildings, to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 7) Exterior windows on the caretaker's residence shall be of a similar design to those used on the Animal Shelter building west of the site on Arrow Route, to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 8) Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours. 9) Approval is for Phase 1 only at this time, as shown on the site development plans. The development of future phases or of the master planned portion of the parcel will require separate design/development review by the City. Engineering Division 1) Right-of-way shall be dedicated along the Arrow Route frontage per the ultimate right-of-way as indicated on City Drawing No. 1431, sheet 42 of 273 and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 95-15 - HOEIN AuguSt 23, 1995 Page 4 2) The Arrow Route striping plan shall be revised to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 3) The easterly driveway shall be constructed as an emergency access only with a limited access curb per City Standard Drawing No. 105-C. 4) A deposit shall be made for the full improvements for the Rochester Avenue frontage and right-of-way shall be dedicated to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 5) Future driveways on Arrow Route and Rochester Avenue shall conform with City Standard Drawing No. 101-C. They shall also conform with the Driveway Policy for spacing with driveways on the opposite side of each respective street and function as a joint driveway with the adjacent properties. 6) A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated cost of operating all street lights during the first six months of operation. 7) An in-lieu fee as reimbursement for the previously undergrounded overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical, except for the 66 kV electrical) on the opposite side of Arrow Route shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of building permits. The fee shall be in conformance with the approved Underground Reimbursement Agreement UR-007. The amount for APN 229-021-36 is $36,311.85 plus 10 percent interest per year from the approval Of the Agreement in August of 1990. 8) The limits of construction shall be to join the existing improvements at the easterly project boundary. Construct full improvements to the beginning of the curb return on the east side of the future driveway at the westerly project boundary. The improvements shall transition to join the existing improvements to the west to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 9) Reciprocal access shall be provided from APN 229-021-36 to APN 229-021-24 along the westerly property line and the flag portion of APN 229-021-36, fronting Rochester Avenue, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Building & Safety Division l) A drainage device shall be provided along the north property line to handle approximately 20 cubic feet per second of sheet flow from the north. A drainage easement shall be dedicated or other means acceptable to the Building Official shall be provided to take drainage through or around the site. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 95-15 - HOBIN August 23, 1995 Page 5 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED TBIS 23RD DAY OF AUGUST 1995. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCNO CUCAMONGA BY: E. David Barker, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 23rd day of August 1995, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Rall~,rlgl COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENt STANDARD CONDITIONS SUBJECT: Those items che~ are ~ions ol ~pmval. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION , (909) 989-1861, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. TIme LImits 1. Approval shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, if building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 24 months from the date of approval. 2. Development/Design Review shell be approved pfior to / / 3. Approval of Tentative Tract No. is granted subject to the approval of -~/ /.__ J / __/ / 4. The cleveioPershell comrnence, partioipate in, aed consurnmate orcause to be comrnenced, participated in, or consummated, a Melio-Roos Community Facilities District (CFD) for the Ranche Cucamonga Fire Protection District to finance construction and/or maintenance of a fire station to serve the development. The station shell be ionated, designed, and built to all specifications of the Ranche Cucarnonga Fire Protsction District, and shall become the District's proparty upon completion. The equipment shall be selected by the District in accordance with its needs. In any building of a station, the deveiober shall comply with all applicable laws and regulations. The CFD shell be formed by the District and the developer by the time recordation of the final map occurs. 5. Prior to recordation of the final map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes first, the applicant shall consent to, or partioipate in, the establishment of a Mello,Roos Community Facilities District for the construction and maintenance of necessary SChool facilities. However, if any school district has previously established such a Community Facilities District, the applicant shell, in the alternative, consent to the annaxatien of the project site into the territory of such existing District priorto the recordation of the final map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comas first. Further, ff the affected school district has not formed a Melio-Floos Community Facilities District within twelve months from the date of approval of the project ae:l p~or to the recordlion of the final map or issuance of building permits for said project, this coediticn shall be peerned null and void. __/ / __/ / This condition shall be waived if the City receives notice that the applicant and all affected .school districts have entered into an agreement to privately accommodate any and all school ampacts as a result of this project. Prior to mcordation of the final map or prior to issuance of building permits when no map is involved, written certification from the affected water district that adequate sewer and water facilities are or will be available to serve the pmpesed project shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subd ivisicn or prior to issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. B. Site Development V'/' 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the appmved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on tile in the Pinning Division, the conditions contained herein, eveiopment Code regulations, and I~--~v .~,Jr-ri*, ~ Specific Plan and Planned Community. / 8. __/ / ~ / 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all J / Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. J / Occupancy of the facility shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and State Fire Marshall's regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Ranche Cucamunga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance. The building shall be inspected for compliance pdor to occupancy. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be ___/ / submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. _._/ / All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shell be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.), or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has.commenced, whichever cernes lirst. Approval of this request shall not waive cempliance with all sections of the Deveiopmant Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicabla Community Plans or Specific Plans in effect at the time of Building Pen'nit issuance. A detailed on-site lighting plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner and Sheriff's Department (989-6611 ) prior to the issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. __J / _,J / If no cantrelized trash receptacles are provided, all trash plc~-up shall be for individual units J / with all receptacles shielded from public: view. __J / Trash receptacle(s) are required and shell meet City standards. The final design, locations, and the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 10. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transtormers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, betruing, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner. __/ / sc- lo/~4 2 11. Street names shell be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with __/ / the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map. 'v/' 12. All building numbers and individual units shall be ldentitied in a clear and concise manner, _._/ / including proper illumination. 13. A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing, and weed control, in accordance with City Master Trail drawings, shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to approval and recordation of the Final Tract Map and prior to approval of street improvement and grading plans. Developer shall upgrade and construct all trails, including fencing and drainage devices, in conjunction with street improvements, 14. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shell not prohibit the keeping of equine animals where zoning requ iremerits for the keeping of sald animals heve been met. Individual lot owners in subdivisions shall have the option of keeping said animals without the necessity of appealing to beards of directors or homeowners' associations tor amendments to the CC&Rs. 15. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Divisions and the City Attorney. They shell be recorded conojrrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer. 16. All perkways, open areas, and landscaping shell be permanently maintained by Ihe property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of Ibis landscape maintenance shell be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 17. Solar access easements shell be dedicated for the purpose of assuming that each lot or dwelling unit shell heve the right to receive sunlight across adjacent lots or units for use of a solar energy system. The easements may be contained in a Declaration of Restrictions for !he subdivision which shell be recorded concurrently with the recordation of the final map or msuance of permits, whichever comes first. The easements shall prohibit the casting of shedows by vegetation, structures, fixtures or any other object, except for utility wires and similar objects, pursuant to Development Code Section 17.08,060-G-2. 18. The project centaine a designated Historical Landmark. The site shell be pereloped and maintained in ~acco_rdance with the Historic Lanclrnak Alteration Permit No. · Any further modifications to the site including, but not limited to, exterior aiteratione and/or interior aiteratione which affect the exterior of the buildings or structures, removal of landmark trees, de malition, relocation, reconstruction of build ings or structures, or changes to the site, shall require a modification to the Historic Landmark Alteration Permit subject to Historic Preservation Cornmission review and approval. C. Building Design sc - to/~4 1. An alternative energy system is required to provide domestic hot water for all dwelling units and for heating any swimming pool or spa, unlaas other alternative energy systems are demenetrated to be of equivalent capacity and efficiency. All swimming pools installed at the time of initial development shell be supplemented with solar heating. Details shell be included in the building plans and shell be submitted for City Ranner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. All dwellings shall have the frort, side and rear elevatibna upgraded with architectural tra.atment, detailing and increased delineation of sudace treatment subject to City Planner revww and approval prior to issuance of building permits. ,_/ /, ,_/ / __/ / ~ / / / ~ / ,_/ / ./ 3. Standard patio cover plans for use by the Homeowners' Association shall be submitted for City Planner and Building Official review and approval prior to issuance Of building permits. 4. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound 13,jffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Division. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constnjcteq to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Details shall be included in building plans. D. Parking and Vehlculsr Access (Indicate details on building plans) 1, AII Parking lot landscape islands shall have a minirnum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb). Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/u nits/buildings with open spaces/ plazas/recreational uses. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be stdped per City standards. 4. All units shall be provided with garage door openers if driveways are less than 18 feet in depth from back of sidewalk. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions shall restrict the storage of recreational vehicles on this site unless they are the principal source of transportation for the owner and prohibit parking on interior circulation aisles other than in designated visitor perking areas. Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the City Planner, City Engineer, and Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval pdorto issuance of building permits. E. Landscaping (for publlcly malntalned landscape areas, mter to Sectlon N.) J/1. A detailed andscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscap- ing in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. .Existing trees required to be presented in place shall be protected with a oonsfroctlon berder in accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19.08.110, and so noted onthe grading plane. The tocatlon of those trees to be presented in place and new locations fortransplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plane. The applicant shall follow all of the arborisrs recommendations regarding presentation, transplanting and trimming methods. 5. A minimum of trees pergross acre, comprised of the following sizes, shall be provided within the project: % - 48- inch box or larger, % - 36- inch box or larger, __ % - 24- inch box or larger, % - 15-gallon, and % - 5 gallon. VroiectNo.:Lt,,/P Completion Date: J / __J / J / / / / J / _J / .~/ / ,~/ / A minimum of ~ 0 % of trees planted within the project shall be specimen size trees - _,J / 24-inch box or larger. Within perking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three J / parking stalls, sufficient to shade 50% of the perking area at solar noon on August 21. sc- lo/94 4 V/ 6. Trees shell be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of I~jiiding. All private slope banks 5 feet or less in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than 2:1 slope, Shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. AllPrivate siopesinexcessofSfeet,butlessthan8 feet invedical height andof2:l orgreater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as fo. llows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1 -gallon or larger s,-e shrub per each 100 eq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and van/slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation syslem to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. ,/ For single family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continu- ously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the deveioper until each individual u n it is sold and occupied by the buyer. Priorto releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Ranning Division to determine that they are in satistacton/ 10. For rnuiti*family residential and ncn-residentlal development, proparty owners are respen- sibla for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shell be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in a healthy and thriving codditlon, add shell receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, deed, diseased, or decaying plant matehal shell be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. 11. Front yard landscaping shell be required perthe Deveiopmant Code and/or · This requirement shell be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting. 12. The final design of the pealmater barkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shell be subject to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan wh ioh may be required by the Engineering Division. 13. Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, apeciman size trees, meander- ing chang.,. and,.te.....land=plng. lsrequ,,ed along 'v/' 14. Landscaping and iffigation systems required to be inslalled within the public right-of*way on the perimeter of this project area shell be continuously maintained by the developer. V/ 15.A~~wallsshe~~bepr~videdwithdec~rativetreatmant~~~~ca~edinpub~icmeintenanceareas' the design shell de coordinated with the Engineering Division. 16. Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. These criteria shell encourage the natural growth charactedstios of the selected tree species. 17. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of Xerisc, a,oe as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucemonga Municipal Code. sc- ~o/94 /.__/ /.__/ J / _._/ / ___/ / .__/ / .__/ / __./ / / / / .__/ F, SIgns 1. Thesignsindioatedonthesubmittedplansareconceptualonlyandnotapartofthisapproval. ,.,_/ / Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of any signs. 2. A Uniform Sign Program for this development shall be submitted for City Planner review and ._./ / approval pdor to issuance of building permits. ~ / Directory monument sign(s) shall be provided for apartment, condominium, or townhomes prior to occupancy and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. G. Environmental The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Fourth Street Rock Crusher project in a standard lotmat as delermined by the City Planner, priorto accepting a cash deposit on any property. The developer shell provide each prospective buyer written notice of the City Adopted Special Studies Zone for the Red Hill Fault, in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. The developer shell provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Foothill Freeway project in a standard formal as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 4. A final acoustical report shell be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. The final report shell discuss the level of interior noise attenuatldnto beiow45CNEL, thebuildiog materiaisand constructiontechnk:luesprovided, and ff appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report. H. Other Agencies 1. EmergencYsecondaryaccessshellbeprovidedinaccordancewithRanchoCucamongaFire Protection District ,Standards. 3. Emergency access shell be provided, rnalnfensnce !ree and clear, a minimum of 26 feet wide at all times dudng construction in accordance with Rancho Cucamenga Fire Protection District requirements. Prior to issuance ol building parrnits for combustible ccnetructidn, evidence shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamenga Fire Protection District that temporary water supply for fire protection is available, pending completion of required fire protection system. The applicant shell contact the U. S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mail boxes. Multi-family residential developments shell provide a suiid overhead structure for mail boxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mail boxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building parrnits. ~J 4. ~ / __J / __J / __/ / ~ / ~ / __J / sc- 10/94 For projects using septic tank facilities, written certification of acceptability, including all supportive information, shall be obtained from the San Bemardino County Department of Environmemal Health and submitted to the Building Offiolal priorto the issuance of Septic Tank Permits, and prior to issuance of building parrnits. I / APPLICANTS SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 989-1863, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: I. Site Development V/ 1. The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Cede, Uniform Mechani- cat Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Eledric Code, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of issuance of relative permits. Please contact the Building and Safely Division for copies of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. ,_/ /. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or major addition ---/ / to existing un it(s), the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but am not limited to: City Beautffication Fee. Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Systems Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fees. / 3. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commemlal or industrial development or ~ / addition to an existing development. the applicant shell bey doveiopment fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: Systems Develupmant Fee, Drainage Fee, School Fees, Permit and Plan Checking Fees. 4. Street addresses shall he provided by the Building Official, aftertract/bercel map recordatisn / / and prior to issuance of building permits. J. Existing Structures Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for the property line clearances considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness of existing buildings. Existing buildings shall be made to comply with correct building and zoning regulations for the intended use or the building shell be demolished. K. Grading v'/1. 3. Existing sewage disposa facilities shall be removed, filled and/or capped to co reply with the Uniform Plumbing Code and Uniform Building Code. 4. Underground on-~ite utilities am to be located and shown on building plans submitted for building permit application. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shell be in substantial conformance with the approvad grading plan. A soils report shell be prebered by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of Califomla to bedorm such work. The development is located within the soil erosion control buundahes; a SOil Disturbance Permit is required. Please contact San Bemardino County Depadment of Agriculture at (714) 387-2111 for permit application. Documentation of such permit shell be submitted to the City prior to the issuance of rough grading permit. 4. A geological report shall be preberad by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check. L,//5. The final grading plans shall be completed and approved prbr to issuance of building permits. sc- xo/9~ 7 / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / 6. As a costom-lit subdivision, the following requirements shall be met: a. Surety shall be ~ 4r(l an agreement executed guaranteeing completion of all on-site ---/ / drainage facilities necessary for dewatedng all parcels to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division prior to final map approval and prior to the issuance of grading permits. b. Appropriate easements for safe disposal of drainage water that are conducted onto or over adjacent parcels, am to be delineated and recorded to the smisfaction of the Building and Safety Division prior to issuance of grading and building permits. c. On-site drainage improvements, necessary for dewatering and protecting the subdivided ---/.---J proparties, am to be installed prior to issuance of building pan'nits for construction upon any parcel that may be subject to drainage flows entering, leaving, or within a parcel relative to which a building parroll ts requested. d. Final grading plane for each parcel are to be submitted to the Building and Safety --/---J pivlsic n for approval prior to issuanceof building and grading parrnits. (This may be on an incremental or composite basis.) e. All siopa hanks in excess of 5 feet in vertical heigll~ shall be seeded with native grasses __J / or planted with ground cover for erosion control upon completion of grading or some other alternative method of erosion control shall be completed to the satlsfactlin of the Building Official. In addition a parnmnenl irrigation system shall be provided. This requirement does not release the applicant/developer from compliance with the slibe planting requirements of Section 17.08.040 1 of the Development Code. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 981-1862, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: I Dedlcatlon ant Vehicular Accee~ 1. Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, community trails, public paseo8, public landscape areas, street trees, and public drainage fadlilies as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. Private easements for non-public facllilles (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc.) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or leNarive map. 2. Dedication shell be made of the following rightS-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street camedine): total feet on tmaf feet on total feet on 3. An irrevocabfo offerofdedioationfor for all private streets Or ddvas. -font wide roadway easement shell be made sc- 10/94 4. Non-vehiouler ~:~ss shall be dedicated to the City for the following sireats: ~ 5. Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs or by deeds and shall be recoKled concurrently with the map or prior to the issuance of building permits, where no map is involved. 8 -_/ / J / .,_/ / / / 6. Privatedrainageeasementsforcross*lotdrainageshallbeprovidedandshallbedelineated or noted on the final map. 7. The lioal map shah clearly delineate a 10-toot minimum building.ressriclion area on the neighboring let adjoining the zero let line wall and contain the Iollewing language: "l/We hereby dedicate to the City of Rancho Cucamonga the fight to prohibit the construction of (residential) buildings (or other structures) within those areas designated on the map as building restriction areas." A maintenance agreement shall also be granted from each let to the adjacent lot through the CC&R's. 8. Al~existingeasements~yingwithinfuturerights-~f`.waysha~~bequitc~aimed~rde~ineated~n the final map. 9. Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside Ihe public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City wherever they encroach onto private properly. 10. Additional street right-of-way shell he dedicated along dght tum lanes, to provide a minimum of 7 feet measured from the face of curbs, If curb adjacent sidewalk is used along the right turn lane, a parallel street tree maintenance easerneht shall be provided. 11. The develeper shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site probe rty interests necessary to construct the required public improvements, and If he/she should fail to do so, the daveleper shall, at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final map for approval, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code Section 66462 atsuchtimeastheCitYacquiresthepropertyinterestSrequiredfortheimprovements. Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developerof all costs incurred by the City to acquire the off-site proparty interests required in connection with the subdivision. Security for a partion of these costs shell be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the doveleper, at developers coat. The appraiser shell have been approved by the City prior to commencement of Ihe appraisal. M. Street ImproveIReNe 1. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, commenity trails, pass)s, landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentmire map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and atraet trees. J 2. A minimum of 26- foot wide pavement, within a 40 -foot wide dedicated right-of-way shall be constmctad for all hall-section streels. 3. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited STREET NAME Cues A.C. Si)E* o~n45 mEET S'mEET CadU MED4AN 6~E GUTrER PVMT W,~.X APf~. I.I3HTS 'f~EES TRAL 19,.ANI) 'f~,eJL d vCe ,__/ / J / J /.. __/ / __/ / ___/ / to: _/ / OTHER Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and ovedays will be ~d~ rmined during plan check. (c) ff so marked, side- walk shall be curvilinear per STD. 7,,,~d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided tot lhis item/ ~) 'T'H'e T)FT-tk, E' z~'J;9~.~l¢~-[ ,~H'A-CL- 4. Improvement plans and construction: Street improvement plans including street trees and street lights, prepared by a regis- tered Civil Engineer. shall be submitted to and appruved by the City Engineer. Secudty shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or pdvate street improve- ments, priorto final map approval orthe issuance of building bennits, whichever occurs first. Prior to any work being pedormed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineers Office in addition to any other permits required. .__/ / __/ / c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic, street name signing, and interconnect conduit _.J / shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signalconduitwithpullbexesshallbeinstalledonanynewconstruotionorreconstructicn __/ / of major, secondary or collector streets which intersect with other major, secondary or collector streets for future traffic signals. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides bt the street at 3 feet outside of BC R, ECR or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: /_._/ (1) All pull boxes shall be No. 6 unless othenNise specified by the City Engineer. (2) Conduit shall be 3-inch gaivanizeq steel with pullrope. e. Wheel chair ramPs shall be installed on all four comers of intersections per City /---J Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiting construction sham remain open to traffic at all times with / / adequate detours dudrig construction. A street closure permit may be required. A cash dsbo~ shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon complation of the construction to the satislaclion ot the City Engineer. g, Concentrated drainage flows shall not c, mss sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be .__/ / installed to City Standards, excel;x lot single family lots. h. Handicap _8cce__ss ramp design shall be as specified by the City Engineer. .J / i. Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check. .J / 5. Street improvement plans per City Standards for all I:mvate streets shall be provided for __/ / review and approval by the City Engineer. Prior to any work being parlormeal on the pri- vate streets, fees shall be paid and constnjctlen permits shall be obtained from the City Engineers Office in addition to any other permits required. 6. Street trees, a minimum of 15..gaiidn size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in __J / accordance with the City's street tree program. 7. Intersection line of site designs styall be reviewed by the City Engineer for COnforrnance with adopted policy. a. On coUector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Walls, signs, and slopes shall be located outside the lines of sight. Landscaping and other obetructidns within the lines of sight shall be approved by the City Engineer. b. Local residential street intersections shall have their noticeability improved, usually by moving the 2 +/- closest street trees on each side away from t he street and placed in a street tree easement. _.J / __/ / _J / 8. A permit shall be obtained from CALTRANS for any won~ within the following right-of-way: _.J /. 9..All public improvements on the following streets shall be oporatlonally complete prior to the Issuance of building porrnits: _._/ / N. Public Maintenance Area~ 1. A separate set of lendscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards shell be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. The following landscape pad<ways, medians, pasees, easements, trails, or other areas are required to be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance District: 2. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the apFoprlate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer priortofinal map appmval or issuanceof building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be berne by the developer. ,__/ / 4. Parkway lar~___,~':aplng on the following street(s) shall conlorm to the results of the respective Beautificatlon Master Ran: .__/ / 3. AitrequiredlNbliclandscapingandiffigationsystems shallbeconlinuouslyrnaintainedbythe .__/ / developer until accepted by the City. __,/ O. Drainage and Flood Comrol .1. The Project (or portions thereol) is located within a FIood Hazard Zone; therefore, ficod ._.J / protection measures shall be provided as certified by a registered Civit Engineer and alpproved by the City Engineer. 2. It shell be the developer's resp3neibitify to have the current FIRM Zone designation removed from the project area. The deveicper's engineer shell prepare all necessary reparls, plans, and hydrologiC/hydraulic calculations. A Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) shall be obtained from FEMA prior Io final map aprN'oval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) shall he issued by FEMA prior to _oc~_jpancy or improvement acceptance, whiChever occurs first. 3. A final drainage study shell be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the L_~d_jance of building parrnits, whichever occure fimt. All drainage facilities shell be installed as required by the City Engineer. ~ / 4. A permit from the County Flood Control District is required for work within its right-of-way. 5. Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any publid storm drain pipe measured from !he outer edge of a mature tree trunk. 6. Public storm drain easements shall be graded to convey overflows in the event of a blockage in a sump Catch basin on the public street. P. Utilities 1. Provide separate ulilily sendices to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and Cable 'IV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility StandamLs. Easements shall be provided as required. N/yt._2.The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the CuCamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho CuCamonga Fire Protection District, ' ' and the Environmemal Health Department of the County of San Bemardino. A letter of compliance from the CCWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first.. .1/ / __J / __/ / Q. General Requirements and Approval~ 1. The separate parcels comained within the project boundaries shall be legally combined into one parcel prior to issuance of building permits. 2. An easement for a joint use driveway shall be provided prior to final map approval or issuance of building perTnits, whichever occurs first, lot: ,_J / __/ / 3. Prior to approval of the final map a deposit shag be posted with the City covering the estimated cost Of apportioning the assessments under Assessment District among the newly created parcels. 4. Etiwanda/San Sevaina Area Regional Mainline, Secondary Regional, and Master Plan Drainage Fees shall be paid I~lor to final map ~al or pelor to building permit issuance if no map is involved. 5. Permits shall be obtained from the following agencies for work within their right-of-way: ._/ / __/ / /,__/ 6. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the Law Enforcement COmmunity Facilities Dislrk~ shall be filed with the City Engineer I:mor to final map al:q:~oval or the issuance Of building permits, whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall he borne by the Developer. 7. Prior to finalization Of any development phase, sufficient iml~ovement plans shall be com- pleted beyond the phase bo~jndarlas to =__~_~jre secondary access and drainage protection to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Phase boundaries sharl correspond to lot lines shown on the approved tentative map. /___/ __/ / APPUCANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 987-6405, FOR COMPUANCE iNITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. Mello Rcos COmmunity Facilities District requirements shall al:q:~ to this project. v/2. Fire flow requirement shall be A previous fire flow, conducted gpm availa~ at 20 psi,, gallons per minute. revealed A fire flow shall be conducted by the builder/developer and witnessed by fire depadment personnel prior to water plan approval. For the IcxJrpose of final acceptance, an additional fire flow'test of the on-site hydrants shall be conducted by the builder/developer and witnessed by the fire department personnel after construction and prior to occupancy. V/' 3.Firehydr~ntsarerequired.AJ~r~quiredbublic~r~n~sit~firehydrantssha~~beinsta~ied~f~ushed and operahie prior to delivery of any combustible building mate dais 0 n site (i .e., lumber, roofing materials, atc.). Hydrants flushing shell be witnessed by fire department personnel. 4~Exlstingfirehydrannt~~catloneshe~~bepr~videdpri~r~~waterp~anappr~vaLRequiredhydrants~ if any, will be determined by this department. Fire District standards require a 6" deer with a 4' and a 2-1/2" outlet. Substandard hydrants shell be upgraded to meet this standard. Contact the Fire Safety Division for speciticatlons on approved brands and model numbers. ,5. Pdor to the issuance of building permits for combustible construction,evidence shall he submitted to the Fire District Ihat temporary water supply forfire protection is available, pending completion of required fire protection system. 6. Hydrant reflective markers (blue Pots) shell be required for all hydrants and installed prior to final inspection. .7. An automatic fire extinguishing system(s) will be required as noted below: /Per Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance 15. Qher /._.._/ _J / Note: Special sprinkler Ponsifies are required for such hazardous operations as woodworking, plastics manufacuring, spray painting, flammable liquids storage, high piled stock, etc. Contact Rre Safely Divisioh to determine if sprinkler system is adequate Ior proposed operations. 8. Sprinkler system monitoring shal/be installed and operational immediately uPon completion of sprinkler system. .9. A fire alarm system(s) shall be required as noted below: Per Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance 15. California Code Regulation~ Tie 24. NFPA 101. other ._/ / / 10. Ro aye within project shaft comply with the *'lAIIroadways. Fire Districts fire lane standards, as noted: Other CuP 11. Fire department access shall be amended to facilitate emergency apparatus. ---/ / 12. Emergency secondary access shall be provided in accordance with Fire District standards. .---/ ~ 13, EmergencY access shall be Provided, maintenancefreeandclear, aminimumof26feetwide __/ / at all times dudng construction in accordance with Fire District requirements, v/14 All trees planted in any median shall be kept tdmmed a minimum of 14'6" from ground up so /.__/ as not to impede fire apparelus. 15. A building directory shall be required, as noted below: ---/---/ Lighted director within 20 feet of main entrance(s). Standard Directory in main lobby. Other 6. A Knox rapid entry key vault shall be installed priorto final inspection. Proof of bumhase shall be submitted prior to final building plan approval. Contact the Fire Safety Division for specific details and ordedng information. 17~Gafed/restrictedentry(s)requireinsta~~afion~faKn~xrapldentrykeysystem~ContacttheFire j...._j Safety Division for specific details and ordering information. 18. A tenant use letter shall be submitted prior to final building plan approval. __/..__/ shall be paid: Prior to wafer plan approval. /Prior to final plan approval. Note: Separate plan check fees for fire protection system (spririlers. hood systems, alarms, etc.) and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed upon submittal of plans. 20. Special permits may be required, depending on intended use, as noted below: A. General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not sbedfically described below, which in the judgement of the Fire Chte~ is likely to produce conditions hazardous to li~e or properly. B. Storage of readily combustible rnateltal. Places of assembly (except churches, schools and other non-profit organizations) Bowling alley and pin refinishing. E. Cellulose Nitrate plastic (Pyroxylin). Combustible fibers storage and handling exceeding 100 cubic feet. Garages Motor vehicle repair (H-4) sc- 10/94 Lumber yards (over 100,000 beard feet). 14 c He ,_] / I. Tim rebuilding plants. J. Auto wrecking yards. Junk or waste rnaletial handling plants. K. Flammable finishes. Spraying or dipping operations, spray booths, dip tanis, electrostatic apparatus, automobile undercoating, powder mating and organic peroxides and dual com- ponent coatings (per spray booth). L. Magnesium (more tha 10 pounds per day). Oil burning equipment operations. N. Ovens (industrial baking and drying). O. Mechanical refrigeration (over 20 pounts of rofrigerant). P. Compressed gases (store. handle or use exceeding 1 O0 cubic feet). Q. Cryogenic.fluids (storage, handling or use). R. Dust-producing processes and equipment. S. Flammable and combustible liquids (storage, handling or use). T. High piled combustible stod<. U. Lk:luifled petroleum gas (store, handle, transport or use more than 120 gallons). V. Matches (more than 60 Matchrnan's gross). W. Welding and cutting operations: to conduct welding and/or cutting operations in any occupancy, C (.;/" y,.l'-/~' sc - to/94 15 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAlVlONGA ' STAFF REPORT DATE: August 23, 1995 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Steve Hayes, AICP, Associate Planner SUBJECT: MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 87-17 AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 88-28 - RANCHO CUCAMONGA HOSPITAL - A request to modify conditions relative to the design of a required outdoor plaza and the timing of its construction for an existing vacant hospital complex totaling approximately 99,000 square feet on 6.2 acres of land in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 7) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, located at 10841 White Oak Avenue - APN: 208-351-61. ABSTRACT: The purpose of this modification is to consider the applicant's request to create three art focal points in-lieu of constructing, at this time, the outdoor plaza originally approved for this project. Because the plaza was master planned to be split with the adjacent property (see Exhibit "C") and the adjacent property is under different ownership with no immediate plans to construct the master planned building in the near future, the applicant contends that construction of the entire plaza at this time is not feasible. It should also be noted that the existing situation requires emergency fire access through the area originally specified as the plaza to the rear of the site, thereby preventing the developer from constructing certain key elements approved for the plaza (i.e., fountain, screen walls, landscape planters) until such time that the other building is developed and the permanent emergency access plan for the entire master planned area completed. The approved plaza design is shown in Exhibit "D." BACKGROUND: Conditional Use Permit 87-17 was originally approved by the Planning Commission on July 8, 1987, with a modification to the original design, including a revision to the plaza design, approved by the Planning Commission on October 12, 1988. Since that time, the medical office building and hospital have been constructed but not occupied. The half of the plaza on this properly was developed with only the special paving and bench seating specified from the approved p!aTa design. For more background information, please refer to the applicant's letter (Exhibit "A"). ANALYSIS: General: The applicant is proposing to use public art pieces in three locations on the property in-lieu of completing the outdoor plaza as originally presented and approved by the Planning Commission, for reasons stated earlier. The proposal consists of 1) combination monument sign/art piece at the primary vehicular entrance, with the art piece consisting of three individual ITEM D PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 87-17/DR 88-28 - RANCHO CUCAMONGA HOSPITAL August 23, 1995 Page 2 metal wind vanes with colored metal "flags;" 2) water pool with three colored wind vanes near the main pedestrian entrance to the medical office building; and 3) water pool with a metal medical insignia that appears to be floating above the pool at the east end of the medical office building. Outdoor plaTas, especially for potentially user intensive uses such as a hospital, are recommended to be integral design features for buildings within the industrial area to promote energy conservation by providing a nice, pedestrian-scale space for people to eat and break on- site. The Industrial Area Specific Plan recommends the use of street furniture within these areas, such as bench seating, overhead shade structures, trash receptacles, lighting, and drinking fountains. It is staffs opinion that some of these elements should be incorporated on- site, possibly in conjunction with the two proposed fountains, to provide usable outdoor areas for employees and visitors to the hospital. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee (Barker, Lumpp, Fong) reviewed the request on a consent calendar basis on August 15, 1995, and recommended approval subject to the following: 1) the entry monument be modified to the satisfaction of the City Planner and 2) the applicant make a good faith effort to complete the plaza area at such time that the adjacent property develops. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin Newspaper, the property has been posted, and notices were sent to all property owners within a 300 foot radius of the site. RECOMMENDATION: Staffmcommends that the Planning Commission approve the Modi~cation to Conditional Use Permit 117-17 and Development Review 88-28 through adoption oft he attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions. City Planner BB:SH:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Applicant's Letter Exhibit "B" - Existing Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Approved Master Plan Exhibit "D" - Approved Outdoor PlaTa Design Exhibit "E" - Proposed Design Supplement Resolution of Approval for Conditional Use Permit 87-17 Resolution of Approval for Development Review 88-22 Background Information This document is requesting a conditional use amendment to the Rancho Cucamonga Medical Center project located at 10841 White Oak Ave, The site consisis of 2.21 acres with two attached structures· See the enctosed drawing identified as "Existing Site Plan"· The most visible structure is a three story Medical Office Building and it has a one story 49 bed hospital attached on the southeast side· Neither building has been occupied since completion of construction· The Medical Office Building has been available for occupancy for approximalely 36 months. The Hospital has been completed for approximately 24 months. 'The owner is Kajima Development Corporation, (KDC) with offices located in Monterey Park. California. This project was initially presented to Ihe Rancho Cucamonga Ranning Commission in · 1987 by KDC and their partner at that lime. Continenlal Health Properties (CRP). The '~projecl representatives presented their master plan which showed hNo idenlical (mirror- ~JO image) buildings with a plaza area between them with the main vehicle entrance centered on the overall site See the allached site plan noted as "Original Master Plan - Proposed in 1987", Upon entering the site from the north ihe focal point is a half cimle "plaza area". The plaza design concept was approved by the Planning Commission in 1988 based on this total site development· The specific "Plaza" design elements were reviewed in detail with the Design Review Committee in 1989 prior to starting construction on the (Phase II) hospital structure. The owners presented the actual land ownership facts at that lime, slating thai they did not purchase the adjacent land Io the west where the Phase III, 3 story Medical Office Building was shown to be built per the original master pian, Therefore, the concept of a cenlral "Plaza Area" was compromised. The Design Review Committee approved an interinVpartiat plaza be constructed with the stipulation that when the adjacent land owner, to ihe west, develops their site il must comptele the remaining half of the Plaza Area design· Background Information Continued The City of Rancho Cucamonga provided a temporary occupancy permil in Oclober 1991 for the MOB with the condition that the permit would be revoked if the owner did not complete the construction of the total Plaza Area as approved or somehow assure the City that the plaza will be completed in/he future as previously agreed This issue has remained unresolved due to the fact that lhe owners original tenants, a physician group, chose not to finalize their lease agreemenl and move into the new medical office building. This physician group has dissolved their partnership and is not in a posilion ~o occupy the building KDC has sustained a major financial loss to date on this project However, Kajima Development has located an organization to purchase this site and buildings. The buy - sell agreement has been in escrow for the last several monlhs and the sale is scheduled to close September 6th, except the purchaser is not willing to close escrow without having the plaza issue completely resolved. Design Proposal The purchaser is proposing a design concept different from the "Plaza Design" to bring ether design interest into the site There are several basic reasons for modifying the design feature: 1 ) The land to the west may not be developed for some lime, due to current economic conditions. 2) The adjacent land owner may develop Ihe land for a use other than KDC-CHP considered. 3) The location of the original plaza is not very visible from Spruce Ave. at the site main entrance We are proposing at least two separate design features on site to provide visual interest and site identity· The proposed design sketches are included in this information package 1 ) A special landmark to be built adjacent to Ihe main entrance. This will be located back from the property lina with adequate line-of-sight Io permit a safe view ot oncoming vehicles.. 2) A waler pool with three bright colored flag shaped wind vanes Ioca ed outside, at the cenler of the medical office building main entrance. 3) A possible alternate location of a design element, could be at the east end of the medical office building where a large scored concrete area occurs· This area may have anolher cluster of three bright colored flags with a circular base at walkway level made of a different material than concrete, possibly brick pavers; or a with a medical insigna scurptured on a single pole· ~i LR l;!, ! Existhg Site Plan - Rancho Cucamonga Medical Center Existing Vehicle Ent~y~, ,90 y/ rutuwe Buid~g Shown on Neighbors Property Ofigional Master Plan Proposed In 1987 .- t2:r 1EDICAL OFFICE BL _DING SERVICE AREA ................. STEPPED SCREEN WALL .......... 'STEPPED PLANTER WALLS FLOWERING ACCENT TREE FOUNTAIN/WAfER FEATURE -- RADIATING PAVING PATTERN --LOW PLANTER WALL Pedestrain Entrance Nodes A VEHICULAR ENTRANCE "'1 n n Signage Setback ~,~c~o cuc.~lowc.~ M~IC~L C~rr~ ~ I I ~ R~NCHO CUCAMONGA MEDICAL CENTER Main Entrance Water Element Sculpture RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 87-17, A REQUEST TO MODIFY CONDITIONS RELATIVE TO THE DESIGN OF A REQUIRED OUTDOOR PLAZA AND THE TIMING OF ITS CONSTRUCTION FOR AN EXISTING VACANT HOSPITAL COMPLEX TOTALING APPROXIMATELy 99,000 SQUARE FEET ON 6.2 ACRES OF LAND IN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK DISTRICT (SUBAREA 7) OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED AT 10841 WHITE OAK AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 208-351-61. 1. Steve Josee has filed an application for a modification to Conditional Use Permit No. 87-17, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject modification request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 23rd day of August 1995, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the Substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on August 23, 1995, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located at 10841 White Oak Avenue with a street frontage of 581 feet and lot depth of 673 feet and is presently improved with a three-story medical office building, a one-story hospital, and curb, gutter, and landscaping along the entire length of the project frontage; and b. The property to the north of the subject site is an existing hotel, the property to the south consists of vacant land, and the properties to the east and west are vacant; and c. The property is designated as Industrial Park by the Industrial Area specific Plan; and d. The applicant is proposing to add three focal point art pieces to the project in lieu of construction of the outdoor plaza as originally approved for the project; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 87-17 - JOSEE AuguSt 23, 1995 Page 2 e. Emergency fire access is required through the area designated for plaza in the interim. The adjacent parcel, which includes one-half of the plaza area in question, is under different ownership. Both of these conditions prevent the plaza from being constructed as originally approved. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs i and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. b. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. c. The proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. 4. On July 8, 1987, the Planning Commission issued a Negative Declaration in conjunction with its review, of the development herein and the approval of Conditional Use Permit 87-17. This Commission hereby finds on the basis of substantial evidence that the project herein does not result in any substantial changes or new circumstances (as described in State CEQA Guidelines Section 15162) in the project as previously reviewed to require further environmental documentation. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below. Planning Division 1) All conditions of approval contained in Planning Commission Resolutions 87-110 and 88-206 shall still apply to this project. 2) The proposed secondary and tertiary focal points shall include elements typically found in outdoor plaza/eating areas, as recommended by the Industrial Area Specific Plan to include elements such as, but not limited to, bench seating and/or picnic tables, shade structures, trash receptacles, lighting, and drinking fountains. The final design Of the amenity package for the secondary and tertiary plaza areas shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of any necessary permits for work within the three designated focal point areas. 3) The final design of the entry monument shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of any permits of the sign or occupancy of the building, whichever occurs first. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 87-17 - JOSEE August 23, 1995 Page 3 4) The applicant shall agree to make a good faith effort to coordinate with the property owner Of the adjacent property to complete the plaza as originally designed. 6. The secretary to this Comission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23rd DAY OF AUGUST 1995. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: E. David Barker, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting Of the Planning Commission held on the 23rd day of August 1995, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A MODIFICATION TO DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO.88-28, A REQUEST TO MODIFY CONDITIONS RELATIVE TO THE DESIGN OF A REQUIRED OUTDOOR PLAZA AND THE TIMING OF ITS CONSTRUCTION FOR AN EXISTING VACANT HOSPITAL COMPLEX TOTALING APPROXIMATELy 99,000 SQUARE FEET ON 6.2 ACHES OF LAND IN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK DISTRICT (SUBAREA 7) OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED AT 10841 WHITE OAK AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 208-351-61. 1. Steve Josee has filed an application for a modification to Development Review No. 88-28, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject modification request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 23rd day of August 1995, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamanga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Conunission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on August 23, 1995, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located at 10841 White Oak Avenue with a street frontage of 581 feet and lot depth of 673 feet and is presently improved with a three-story medical office building, a one-story hospital, and curb, gutter, and landscaping along the entire length of the project frontage; and b. The property to the north of the subject site is an existing hotel, the property to the south consists of vacant land, and the properties to the east and west are vacant; and c. The property is designated as Industrial Park by the Industrial Area Specific Plan; and d. The applicant is proposing to add three focal point art pieces to the project in lieu of construction of the Outdoor plaza as originally approved for the project; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR 88-28 - STEVE JOSEE August 23, 1995 Page 2 e. Emergency fire access is required through the area designated for plaza in the interim. The adjacent parcel, which includes one-half of the plaza area in question, is under different ownership. Both of these conditions prevent the plaza from being constructed as Originally approv~d. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. b. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. c. The proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. 4. On October 12, 1988, the Planning Commission issued a Negative Declaration in conjunction with its review, of the development herein and the approval of Development Review 88-28. This Commission hereby finds on the basis of substantial evidence that the project herein does not result in any substantial changes or new circumstances (as described in State CEQA Guidelines Section 15162) in the project as previously reviewed to require further environmental documentation. B. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below. Planning Division l) All conditions of approval contained in Planning Commission Resolutions 87-110 and 88-206 shall still apply to this project. 2) The proposed secondary and tertiary focal points shall include elements typically found in outdoor plaza/eating areas, as recommended by the Industrial Area Specific Plan to include elements such as, but not limited to, bench seating and/or picnic tables, shade structures, trash receptacles, lighting, and drinking fountains. The final design Of the amenity package for the secondary and tertiary plaza areas shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of any necessary permits for work within the three designated focal point areas. 3) The final design of the entry monument shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of any permits of the sign or occupancy of the building, whichever occurs first. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR 88-28 - STEVE JOSEE AugUst 23, 1995 Page 3 4) The applicant shall agree to make a good faith effort to coordinate with the property owner of the adjacent property to complete the plaza as originally designed. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23rd DAY OF AUGUST 1995. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: E. David Barker, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 23rd day Of August 1995, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 759 N. Mountain Avenue P.O. Box 281 Upland, CA 91786 (909) 985-0958 Fax (909) 985-0950 August 23, 1995 City ofRancho Cucamonga Planning Division P.O. BOX 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 RECEIVED AUG 2 3 1995 City of Rancho Cucamonga Ranning Oivision RE: Conditional Use Permit 93-46 Hores Dear Planning Department: Please be advised that the subject project being proposed has a dangerous problem that I believe has been over looked by both the develol:~' and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The current alley driveway on Vineyard Ave. is extremely dangerous. On two occasions last week I was exiting the drive way fi'om parcel 207-211-12 ( a.k. a The Klusman House ) on to the Vineyard Ave. left turn lane going north. On those two occasions I was confromed in a head on position with cars that were also making a left turn ( ~com parcel 208-192-06,07) on to Vineyard Ave. going south. I am sere that there have been other cars in the same circumstance. Eventually when traffic increases on Vineyard Ave. south of Foothill Blvd. there wig be more accidents, some possibly fatal. The solutions I propose are as follows: I ) Completely close off the drive way to Vineyard, except for emergency vehicles or trash trucks. 2) Right turn in and Right turn out only drive way, similar to the Miller's Outpost Center on Archibald Ave. If there is another solution to this issue I would ha happy to discuss it with the developer of the project. Sincerely, U.S. PROPERTIES cc: Engineering Dept. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIVIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: August 23, 1995 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commissior Brad Buller, City Planner Scott Murphy, AICP, Associate Planner MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 93-46 - FLORES - A request to modi~ the appreved site plan and certain conditions of approval for a previously appreved gas station and mini-market in the Community Commercial designation (Subarea 2) of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, located at the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue - APN: 208-192-06 and 07. BACKGROUND: On July 27, 1994, the Planning Commission appreved Conditional Use Permit 93-46 for the construction of gas station and mini-market on a .63 acre parcel at the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue. At the time of approval, the applicant owned both the gas station site and the adjoining Red Hill Liquor site. Because of the size of the gas station site and the dependence on the liquor store for access to Foothill Boulevard, the two sites were considered as part of the same application. The applicant proposed improvements to the liquor store site that would bring the site into closer conformance with the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan development standards. Street improvements, formal hardscape and street tree planting would be provided along the property frontage. Landscaping and a rock screen wall would be provided behind the public right-of-way to screen the parking area. The parking area would be restriped consistent with Code requirements. The access to In-N-Out Burger would be revised to access through the liquor store site, thereby eliminating a drive approach on Foothill Boulevard. In October 1994, the applicant sold the Red Hill Liquor store to the current property owner. In the process of transferring title, the applicant obtained easements for the construction of the trash enclosures and for reciprocal access across the liquor store site. The escrow instructions for the sale indicated that the applicant would be constructing improvements across the front of the liquor store site and that the buyer was aware of these improvements. Prior to the close of escrow, however, the applicant did not obtain the ITEM PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 9346 - FLORES August 23, 1995 Page 2 necessary legal documents (e.g. dedications, easements, right-of-entry) to allow construction of the street and on-site improvements. The applicant has indicated that the liquor store property owner has been unwilling to provide the necessary agreements to the applicant. ANALYSIS: Because of their inability to obtain the necessary agreements to complete the improvements across the liquor store site, the applicant is requesting two actions by the City. First, the applicant is requesting the City initiate condemnation proceedings against the liquor store site. Condemnation of the right-of-way would allow the applicant to install the street improvements, including curb, gutter, sidewalk, and drive approach. These improvements would combine the three drive approaches on the liquor store and In-N-Out Burger sites into one approach on the liquor store site. The majority of the street trees and formal landscaping will be installed within the public right-of-way. A Condition of Approval has been incorporated into the Resolution stating that the applicant shall make a good faith effort to obtain the dedication prior to the City's initiating condemnation proceedings. The cost of the condemnation would be paid by the applicant. The second action requested by the applicant is a modification to the approved site plan to eliminate those improvements on the liquor store site. As noted previously, the approved plans call for the construction of landscaping and a screen wall behind the public right-of-way, restriping the parking lot, the installation of landscaping adjacent to the liquor store building, and the construction of a median at the Foothill Boulevard drive approach. VVhile the majority of these improvements are aesthetic in nature, the opportunity to bring the site into closer conformity with the development standards, as previously agreed to by the applicant, will be greatly reduced. With previous applications, the Planning Commission required the applicant to obtain the consent of the liquor store owner for the improvements necessary to complete the street and parkway improvements. The applicants for Conditional Use Permit 88-03, the prior application approved in September 14, 1988, had reached an agreement with the property owner to install the improvements consistent with the required improvements of this application. Without the property owner's consent, the applicant would not have the ability to complete the project and, in essence, have "no project." Rather than simply waiving the requirements, staff recommends that the applicant be 'required to enter into an agreement requiring the posting of a cash deposit to cover the cost of the on-site improvements. The applicant must then make a good faith effort to obtain the right-of-entry to install the improvements in conformance with the originally approved plans. Only after the applicant has exhausted all reasonable efforts without success would the deposit be returned to the applicant. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 93-46 - FLORES August 23, 1995 Page 3 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the modification to Conditional Use Permit 93-46 with the condition that the applicant post a cash deposit to cover the on-site improvement costs. A Resolution of Approval containing this condition has been attached for your adoption, Respectfully submitted, Br Buller City Planner BB:SM:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Letter from Applicant Exhibit "B" - Original Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Revised Site Plan Resolution Approving Modification to CUP 93-46 August 13, 1995 Planning Commission City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive 'Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91729 Re: Vineyard Shell 8919 Foothill Blvd. Rancho CUcamonga, CA C.U.P. #93-46 RECEIVED AUG 15 1995 City ot Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division Dear Commissioners: The: developers, Art and Diana F/ores are submitting a revised site plan for consideratfon and approval to amend the existing Conditional Use Permit for the above referenced project. This recluest is necessary for the project to proceed. The: C.U.P. approval encompasses the common vehicular ingress and egress involving three separate parcels. Unfortunately, the owner of parcel two illustrated his unwillingness to agree to the conditions of approval. The owner parCel two was in attendance at the planning commission meeting for the presentation of the project. No objecrions were voiced at this time. The F/ores have made repeated attempts to obtain the easement document approval from the owner of parcel two. These easements would include on-site and off-site improvements and. access. The lack of cooperation from the owner of parcel two have left the Floras with no other alternative but to file for this amended C.U.P. We are requesting that the C.U.P. be amended to omit the requirements of on-site improvements to parcel two. Your. understanding and approval will be greatly appreciated. Wesley Okamoto CC,' ,4rt and Diana F/ores Horatio Santoe Jim Brennan Scott Murphy WESLEY OKAMOTO, ARCHITECT 15675 dramira dr/ve, chi~o hills, ca 91709 f909) 393-8934 pager f909J 482-3112 fax (909) 597-5444 ,/ '1'1 ~ C N UTILIZATION SITE PLAN 5.cl.r. ). z NE, I 6A5 5TATI(~I RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 93-46, A REQUEST TO MODIFY THE APPROVED SITE PLAN AND CERTAIN CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED GAS STATION AND MINI-MARKET IN THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL DESIGNATION OF THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN (SUBAREA 2) OF THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND VINEYARD AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF APN: 208-192-06 AND 07. 1. Art and Diana Flores have filed an application for a modification to Conditional Use Permit No. 93-46, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On July 27, 1994, the Planning Commission approved Conditional Use Permit 93-46, subject to Certain conditions, through adoption of Planning Commission Resolution No. 94-67. 3. On the 23rd day of August 1995, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission Of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this commission during the above-referenced public hearing on August 23, 1995, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located at the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue with a street frontage of 140 feet along Foothill Boulevard and 155 feet along Vineyard Avenue and is presently vacant; and b. The property to the north of the subject site is designated for commercial uses and is developed with a retail center. The property to the south is designated for residential uses and is developed with a residential condominium project. The property to the east is designated for commercial uses and is developed with a liquor store. The property to the west is designated for commercial uses and is vacant; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 93-46 - FLORES AuguSt 23, 1995 Page 2 c. The development of the gas station and mini-market is consistent with the Community Commercial designation of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan and the commercial designation of the General Plan; and d. The application, together with the attached conditions of approval, will comply with the standards of the Development Code; and e. The application maintains the same parking setback along Foothill Boulevard of 40 feet as approved as part of Variance 88-09. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the July 27, 1994, and the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the Objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. b. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. c. The proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the state CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; and a Negative Declaration was issued by this Commission on July 27, 1994. Further this Commission finds that the application is in substantial compliance with the original approval for which a Negative Declaration was issued. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Division 1) The applicant shall make a good-faith effort to obtain a right-of-entry agreement to install on-site improvements on the liquor store site (APN 208-192-07) in accordance with the originally approved site plan, as shown on the attached Exhibit "A." The applicant shall post a cash deposit with the City to cover the cost of the on-site improvements prior to the issuance of building permits. If, after exhausting all reasonable efforts to obtain the agreements determined by the City Planner, the applicant is unable to acquire the property owner's permission to complete the improvements, the deposit shall be refunded. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 93-46 - FLORES AuguSt 23, 1995 Page 3 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) 8) 9) lo) The street trees along Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue shall be planted at 30 feet on center consistent with the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan (FBSP). The final plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner and City Engineer prior to building permit issuance. The sidewalks along Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue shall extend to the raised planters. That portion of the sidewalk outside of the public right-of-way shall be maintained by the property owner. Decorative light fixtures, benches, potted plants, and trash receptacles shall be provided consistent with the FBSP. The final plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to building permit issuance. The canopy fascia lighting shall be eliminated. The final plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to building permit issuance. Architectural details of the project shall be worked out with staff prior to building permit issuance. A comprehensive sign program shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to building permit issuance. The parallel parking stall on the west side of the site shall be modified to expand the landscape area on the south end and replace the landscaping on the north end with a painted stripe. The final plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to building permit issuance. Extensive landscaping shall be provided along the south property line. The final plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to building permit issuance. Provisions for the following design features in the trash enclosure shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Planner: a) Architecturally integrated into the design of the project. b) Separate pedestrian access that does not require the opening of the main doors. c) Large enough to accommodate two trash bins. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 93-46 - FLORES August 23, 1995 Page 4 d) Roll-up doors. e) Trash bins with counter-weighted lids. f) Architecturally treated overhead shade trellis. g) Chain link screen on the top to prevent trash from blowing out of the enclosure and designed to be hidden from view. 11) Oraffiti shall be removed within 72 hours. 12) Trash collection shall occur between the hours of 9 a.m. and 10 p.m. only. 13) The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times, and in no event shall trash and debris remain for more than 24 hours. 14) Signs shall be conveniently posted for "no overnight parking" at the site entries and for "employee parking only" along the south row of parking. All operations and businesses shall be conducted to comply with the following standards which shall be incorporated into the lease agreements of all tenants: a) Noise level - All commercial activities shall not create any noise that would exceed an exterior noise level of 60 dB during the hours of 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. and 65 dB during the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. b) Loading and unloading - No person shall cause the loading, unloading, opening, closing, or other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials, garbage cans, or other similar objects between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m., unless otherwise specified herein, in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to a residential area. Engxneering Division 1) The existing overhead utilities (telecommunication and electrical, excluding 66 kV lines) on Vineyard Avenue shall be undergrounded from the first pole south of the south project boundary to the first pole on the north side of Foothill Boulevard. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half of the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development or redevelopment as it occurs on the adjacent parcel to the south or on the opposite side of Vineyard Avenue. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 93-46 - FLORES August 23, 1995 Page 5 2) An in-lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overbead utilities (telecommunication and electrical) at the south property line shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of building permits. The amount shall be the City adopted unit amount times the length of the project frontage. 3) Foothill Boulevard: d) a) b) An additional 15-foot dedication of right-of-way shall be required for a total distance of 75 feet as measured from the street centerline fronting APN 208-192-06 and 208-192-07. c) Full public improvements on the south side fronting APN 208-192-06 and 208-192-07 from Vineyard Avenue to the east property line of APN 208-192-07. Provide necessary public improvements fronting APN 208-192-08 to the east of the project for transitioning, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and Caltrans. The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property interests for street dedication and a construction easement from APN 208-192-07 necessary to construct the required public improvaments. If he/she should fail to do so the developer shall, prior to the issuance of a building permit, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code Section 66462 at such time as the City acquires the property interests required for the improvements. Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developer of all costs incurred by the City to acquire the off-site property interests required in connection with the proposed project. Security for a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the developer, at the developer's cost. The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal. The developer shall be eligible for reimbursement for permanent public improvements installed on the frontage of APN 208-192-07 upon development or redevelopment of that parcel. A request for a reimbursement agreement shall be submitted within the six months following City acceptance of the public improvements. If the developer fails to submit a request for the reimbursement agreement within the 6 month period, all right of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 93-46 - FLORES AuguSt 23, 1995 Page 6 e) Acquire necessary additional right-of-way to transition public improvements fronting APN 208-192-08 adjacent to the east of the proposed project. f) A contribution in lieu of construction for one-half the cost of the median island within Foothill Boulevard, including landscaping and irrigation, shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of building permits. The value of the median island shall be based on the distance from the centerline of Vineyard Avenue to the easterly property line of APN 208-192-06. g) The parkway activity center shall be constructed per the. Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan fronting APN 208-192-06 and 208-192-07 to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and Caltrans. 4). Vineyard Avenue shall be constructed as follows: 5) 6) 7) a) Full improvements on the east side from Foothill Boulevard to the south property line with a transition to the south of the project to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. b) All improvements shall be constructed with respect to the new centerline of construction as it was determined for the required improvements of Parcel Map 12596 on the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue. c) The parkway activity center shall be constructed per the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. Sidewalk easements shall be provided for as necessary. Modification and reloCation, as necessary, Of the traffic signal at the Foothill Boulevard/vineyard Avenue intersection shall be the responsibility of the developer. The relocation and modification shall be to the satisfaction of the city Engineer and Caltrans. "NO Parking/Stopping" signs shall be posted along the frontages of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue on APN 208-192-06 and 208-192-07. A cash contribution in-lieu of construction towards one-fourth the cost of constructing special pavers within the Foothill Boulevard/Vineyard Avenue intersection shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of building permits and shall be based on the square footage of the intersection. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 93-46 - FLORES August 23, 1995 Page 7 8) 9) io) n) 12) 6. The Resolution. The developer shall obtain a right-of-entry for driveway removal and parking lot reconstruction from the owner of APN 208-192-07 prior to the issuance of building permits. The Foothill Boulevard driveway shall serve as a joint access for APN 208-192-06, 208-192-07 and 208-192-08. A signed and recorded agreement between the owners of all affected parcels shall be submitted prior to the issuance of building permits. On Foothill Boulevard, the sidewalk shall be extended to the curb within the bus stop area. The length will be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The band Of decorative pavement within the Vineyard Avenue access shall be located behind the public sidewalk. A corner cut-off for the right-of-way at the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue shall be dedicated to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF AUGUST 1995. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: E. David Barker, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 23rd day of August 1995, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMEN'II STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: SUBJECT: APPLICANT: LOCATION: Those items checked are Conditions of Approval. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION , (909) 989-1861, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. T[RIO LImits Completion Date 1. Approval shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, if building permits are ----/ / not issued or approved use has not commenced within 24 months from the date of 2. Development/Design Review shall be approved prbr to / / , ~ / 3. Approval of Tentative Tract No. is granted subject to the approval of __./ / The deveioper shall commence, participate in, and consummate or cause to be commenced, participated in, or consummated, a Melic-Roos Community Facilities District (CFD) for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District to finance construction and/or maintenance of a fire station to serve the development. The station shall be ioceted, designed, and built to all specifications of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and shall become the District's property upon completion. The equipment shall be selected by the District in accordance with its needs. In any building of a station, the developer shall comply with all applicable laws and regulations. The CFD shall be formed by the District and the developer by the time recordation of the final map occurs. 5. Prior to recordation of the final map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes first, the applicant shall consent to, or participate in, the establishment of a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District for the construction and maintenance of necessary school facilities. However, if any school district has previously established such a Community Facilities District, the applicant shall, in the alternative, consent to the annexation of the project site into the territory of such existing District prior to the recordation of the final map or the issuance of building permits. whichever comes lirst. Further, if the affected school district has not formed a Melio-Roos Community Facilities District within twelve months from the date of approval of the project and prior to Ihe mcordation of the final map or issuance of building permits for said project, this condition shall be deemed null and void. .__/ / _J / 10/94 1 This condition shall be waived if lhe City receives notice that the applicant and all affected .school districts have entered into an agreement to private y accommodate any and all school ~mpacts as a result of this project. 6. Prior to recordation of the final map or prior to issuance of building permits when no map is ~ / involved, written certification from the affected water district that adequate sewer and water facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed project shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development. Such letter must have been issued by the water districtwithing0dayspriortofinal maPaPProvalinthecaseofsubdivislonorpriortoissuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. B. Site Development t/' 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the appmved plans which __/ / include site plans, amhitectural elevations, extedor materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, and ."¢~I~/'AI//-Z·/9rc::r~Z<E'y.4~_.~ specific Plan and Planned Community. ,/ 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon. all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Occupancy of the facility shall not cornroe nce until such time as all Uniform Building Code and State Fire Marshall's regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitled to the Rancho Cucamenga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance, The building shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. __ 4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency pdorto issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.), or pdor to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced. whichever comes first. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community Plans or Specific Plans in effect st the time of Building Permit issuance. A detailed on-site lighting plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner and Sherifrs Department (989-6611 ) pdor to lhe issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. __./ / __/ / J / / / / / L__/ ,/ 8. if no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units with all receptacles shielded from public view. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, and the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to City Plannor review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. /___/ /__/ 10. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be localed out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 2 / / ,/ 11. Slreet names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map. 12. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination. 13. A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing, and weed control. in accordance with City Master Trail drawings, shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval priorto approval and recordation of the Final Tract Map and prior to approval of street improvement and grading plans. Developer shall upgrade and construct all trails, including fencing and drainage devices, in conjunction with street improvements. 14. Th? Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall not prohibit the keeping of equine an~ mals where zoning requirements for the keeping of said animals have been met. Individual lot ownere in subdivisions shall have the option of keeping said animals without the necessity of appealing to boards of directors or homeowners' associations for amendments to the CC&Rs. 15. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Divisions and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuar',ce of building permits, whichever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer. 16. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping sha II be permanently maintained by the property owner, homoowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 17. Solar access easements shall be dedicated for the purpose of assuming that each lot or dwelling unit shall have the right to receive sunlight across adjacent lots or units for use of a solar energy system· The easements may be contained in a Declaration of Restrictions for !he subdivision which shall be recorded concurrently with the recordation of the final map or Jssuance of permits, whichever comos first. The easements shall prohibit the casting of shadows by vegetation, structures, fixtures or any other object, except Ior utility wires and similar objects, pursuant to Development Code Section 17.08.060-G-2. 18. The project contains a designated Historical Landmark. The site shall be deveiopad and maintained in accordance with the Historic Landmark Alteration Permit No. · Any further modifications to the site including, but not limited to, extedor alterations and/or interior alterations which affect the exteriorof the buildings or structures, removal of landmark trees, demolition, relocation, reconstruction of buildings or structures, or changes to the site, shall require a modification to the Historic Landmark Alteration Permit subject to Historic Preservation Commission review and approval. C. Building Design 1. An alternative energy system is required to provide domestic hot water for all dwelling units and for heating any swimming pool or spa, unless other aitemative energy systems are demonstrated to be of equivalent capacity and efficiency. All swimming pools installed at the time of initial development shall be supplemonted with solar heating. Details shall be included in the building plans and shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. sc- 1o/~ All dwellings shat have the fronl, side and rear elevations upgraded with architectural treatment, detailing and increased delineation of su~ace treatmoht subject to City Planner review and approval pdor to issuance of building permits. El? 3 Completion Date: __./ / __/ / _d /. __/ / .__J / ~ / __J / _J / ._J / __/ / Com~|cdon Date: 3. Standard patio cover plans for use by the Homeowners' Association shall be submitted for __/ / City Planner and Building Official review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. / 4. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or __/ / projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Division. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Details shall be included in building plans. D. Parking and Vehicular Access (Indicate details on building plans) v"" 1. AIIParkingiotlandscaPeislandsshallhaveaminimumoutsldedimensionof6feetandshall .__/...._/ contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb). v/' 2. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwe Ilings/units/bu ild ings with open spaces/ plazas/recreational uses. 3. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, ._J / entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. 4. All units shait be Provided with garage door openers if ddveways are less than18 feet in .--/ / depth from beck of sidewalk. 5. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions shall restrict the storage of recreational vehicles ---J / on this site unless they are the pdncipel sourco of transportation for the owner and prohibit perking on interior circulation aisles other than in designated visitor parking areas. Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the City Planner, City Engineer, and Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval pdorto issuance of building permits. __/ / E. Landscaping (for publicly matmalned landscape areas, refer to Section N.) v/ 1..A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope plant ng and model home landscap- __J / ~ng in the case of residential development, shall be prepered by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a cuslom lot subdivision. 2..Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction berder J / m accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19.08.110, and so noted o n the grading plans. The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans. The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting and tdmming methods. 3. Aminimumof treespergrossacre,compdsedofthefoliowingsizes, shallbeprevided __/ / within the project: % - 48- inch box or larger, % - 36- inch box or larger, __ % - 24- inch box or larger, % - 15-gallon, and __.% - 5 gallon. v'/ 4. A minimum of ,~ .% of trees planted within the project shall be specimen size trees - 24-inch box or larger. 5. Within perking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 1S-gallon tree for every three parking stalls, sufficient to shade 50% of the perking area at solar noon on August 21. __/ / __] / sc- 10/~4 6. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of oneCi)mpledorl Date: tree per 30 linear feet of building. .__/ / All private slope banks 5 feet or less in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope ,-but less than 2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. AIIPrivatesiopesinexcessof5feet,butlessthan8 feet inverticatheightandof2:l orgreater slope shaft be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15-galicn or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1 -gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 eq. ft. of siobe area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shaft also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree par each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. For single family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continu- .ously maintained in a healthy and th dying condition by the developer until each individual unit s soil and occupied by the buyer. Priorto releasing occupancy forthose units, an inspection shall be conducted by-the Planning Division to determine that they are in satisfactory condition. 10, For multi-family residential and non-residential development, probere/owners are respon- sible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the publio right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debds and maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. 11. Front yard landscaping shall be required par the Development Code and/or · This requirement shell be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting. 12. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls. landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shell be subject to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Division. 13. Special landscape features such as mounding alluvial rock specimen size trees meander- eng sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is required along ,/ ,/ 14. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shell be continuously maintained by the developer. 15. All walls shall be provided with decorative tremment. If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division. 16. Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. These criteria shall encourage the natural growth charactedstics of the selected tree species. 17. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of Xedscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. sc- ~o/94 ,_J / __/ / J / __/ / J / __/ / __/ / J / J / J / _J / F. SIgns ,/ The signs indicated on t he submitted plans are conceptual on ly and not a part of th is approval. Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall r~quire separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of any signs. Completion Date: __/ / 2. A Uniform Sign Program for this development shall be submitted for City Planner review and __/ / approval prior to issuance of building permits. __J / 3. Directory monument sign(s) shall be provided for apartment, condominium, or townhomes prior to occupancy and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Division pdor to issuance of building permits. G. Environmental The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Fourth Street Rook Crusher project in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the City Adopted Special Studies Zone forthe Red Hill Fault, in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Foothill Freeway project in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, pdor to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 4, .A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval pdor to the ~ssuance of building permits. The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuationtobeiow45CNELthebuitdingmaterialsand constructiontechniquesprovided, and if apprepdate, verify the adequacy of the mittgallon measures. The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report. H, Other Agencies 1. EmergencYsecondaryaccessshallbeprovidedinaccordancewlthRanchoCucamengaFire Protection District Standards. Emergency access shall be provided, maintenance Iree and clear, a minimum of 26 feet wide at all times dudng construction in accordance with Ranche Cucamonga Fire Protection District requirements. Prior to issuance of building permits for combustible construction, evidence shall be submitted to the Ranche Cucamenga Fire Protection District that temporary water supply for fire protection is available, pending completion of required fire protection system. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mail boxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mail boxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mail boxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. ,__/ / ,_J / ~ / ~ / _._/ / __/ / ~ / .__/ / .so - lo/94 For projects using septic tank facilities, written certification of acceptability, including all supportive information, shall be obtained from the San Bemardino County Department of Environmental Health and submitted to the Building Official pdor to the issuance of Septic Tank Permits, and prior to issuance of building permits. 6 ~ / APPLICANTS SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 989-1863, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: I. Site Development v/ 1. TheaPPlicantshallcomPlywiththelatestadoptedUniformBuildingCode, UniformMechani. cal Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of issuance of relative permits. Please contact the Building and Safety Division for copies of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. ,/ v/ 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or major addition to existing u n it(s), the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: City Beaulificatlon Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Systems Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fees. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development or addition to an existing development, the applicant shall pay doveldpment fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: Systems Development Fee, Drainage Fee, School Fees, Permit and Plan Checking Fees. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building Official, aftertract/parcel map recordation and prior to issuance of building permits. J. Existing Structures Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for the properly line clearances considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness of existing buildings. Existing buildings shall be made to comply with corred building and zoning regulations for the intended use or the building shall be demolished. ,/ Existing sewage disposal faci if es shall be removed, filled and/or cabped to comply with the Uniform Plumbing Cede and Uniform Building Code. Underground on-site utilities are to be located and shown on building plans submitted for building permit application. K. Grading V/ 1. Grading of the subject properly shell be in accordance with the Uniform Building Cede, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the appmved grading plan. A SOils repofl shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to pedorm such work. ¸3. The development is located within the SOil ereslon control boundaries; a Soil Disturbance Permit is requ irad. Please contact San Bemardino County Department of Agriculture at (714) 387-2111 for permit application. Documentation of such permit shall be submitted to the City prior to the issuance of rough grading permit. 4. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check. 5. Thefinalgradingplansshallbecompletedandapprovedphortoissuanceofbuildingpermits. Cornple~on Date: .__/ / .__/ / .__/ / J / J / J / J / __/ / J / J / J / .~/ / J / sc- 1o/94 7 6. As a custom-lit subdivision, the lollowing requirements shall be met: a. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed guaranteeing completion of all on-site drainage facilities necessary for dewatedng all parcels to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division priorto final map approval and priorto the issuance of grading permits. b. Appropriate easements for safe disposal of drainage water that are conducted onto -.-J / or over adjacent parcels, are to be delineated and recorded to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division prior to issuance of grading and building permits. c. On-site drainage improvements, necessary for dewatedng and protecting the subdivided ---J / properties, are to be installed prior to issuance of building permits for construction upon any parcel that may be subject to drainage flows entering, leaving, or within a parcel relative to which a building permit is requested. d. Final grading plans for each parcel are to be submitted to the Building and Safety ----/ /- F)ivision for approval prior to issuance of building and grading permits. (This may be on an ~ncremental or composite basis.) e. All slipe banks in excess of 5 feet in vertical height shall be seeded with native grasses or planted with ground cover for erosion control upon completion of grading or some other alternative method of erosion control shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Building Official. In addition a permanent irrigation system shall be provided. This requirement does not release the applicant/deveicpor from compliance with the slope planting requirements of Section 17.08.040 1 of the Development Code. L. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1. Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all intedor public streets, community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. Pdvate easements for non-public facilities (cross-lit drainage, local feeder trails, etc.) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. 2. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way On the perimeter streets (measured from street centedine): ~_~I4/~V~ total feet on total feet on total feet on totalfeeton 3. An irrevocableofferofdedicatlonfor for all private streets or drives. -foot wide roadway easement shall be made 4. Non-vehicular access shall be dedicated to the City for the following streets: .sc- z0/94 5. Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensudng access to all parcels by CC&Rs or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or pdor !o the issuance of building permits, where no map is involved. _._/ / J / _J / J / __/ / J t 6. Privatedrainageeasernentsforcross-lotdrainageshallbeprovided and shallbe delineated or noted on the final map. 7. The final map shall clearly delineate a 10-foot minimum building restriction area on the neighbOring 10t adjoining the zero lot line wall and COntain the following language: "l/We hereby dedicate to the City of Rancho Cucamonga the right to prohibit the construction ef (residential) buildings (or ether structures) within those areas designated on the map as building restriction areas." A maintenance agreement shall also be granted from each lot to the adjacent lot through the CC&R's. ___/ / 8. All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be quitclaimed or delineated on ~ / the final map. t/' 9. Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees plaCed outside the public right-of-way __/ / shall be dedicated to the City wherever they encroach onto pdvate properly. 10. Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum __/ / of 7 feet measured from the face of curbs. If curb adjacent sidewalk is used along the right turn lane, a parallel street tree maintenance easement shall be provided. 11. The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property interests _.J / necessary to construct the required public improvements, and it he/she should fail to do so, the developer shall, at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final map for approval, enter into an agreernent to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code Section 66462 atsuchtimeastheCityacquiresthepropertyinterestsrequiredfortheimprovements. Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developer of ait costs incurred by the City to acquire the off-site property interests required in connection with the subdivision. Security for a pertion of these COsts shell be in the form of a Cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the developer, at deveioper's cost. The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to commencement of Ihe appraisal. M. Street Improvements t/ 1. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, .__/ / landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shell include, bOt are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, ddve approaches. sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. 2, A rain mum of 26- foot wide pavement, within a 40 -fool wide dedicated right-of-way shall be constructed for all half-section streets. ~ / ~ / 3. Construct the foliowing perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: STREET NAME CURe & A.C. SIDtE- DRIVE STREET ~TIqEET CQMM ,MEDIAN BIKE GUTTER PVMT WALK APPR, LIGHTS TREES TRAIL ISLAND TRAIL OTHER ,/ Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstructicn and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, side- walk shall be curvilinear (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall 4. Improvement plans and Construction: Street improvement plans including street trees and street lights, prepared by a regis- tered Civil Engineer, shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Secudty shall be pasted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improve- ments, priorto final map approval orthe issuance of building permits, whichever ocoure first. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineers Office in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, 'marking. traffic, street name signing, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. SignalconduitwithPullbexesshallbeinstalledonanynewconstructionorreconstructldn of major, secondary or collector streets which intersect with other major, secondary or collector streets for future traffic signals. Pull boxes shall be placed on beth sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR or any other locations approveq by the City Engineer. Notes: (1) All pull boxes shall be No. 6 unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. (2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with bullrobe. e. Wheel chair ramps shall be installed on all four comers of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads raquidng construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. A street cios-ra permit may be required. A cash depasit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upan completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family lots. h. Handicap access ramp design shall be as specified by the C~ Engineer. i. Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check. 5. Street improvement plans per City Standards for all private streets shell be provided for review and approval by the City Engineer. Prior. to any work being performed on the pri- vate streets, fees shall be paid and construction permits shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. ComDledon Date: /___/ __/ / _J / ___/ / J / J / _._/ / __J / J / __J / __J / sc- 1o/~,4 ,/' 7. Interseclion line of site designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy, a. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Walls, signs, and slopes shall be located outside the lines of sight. Landscaping and other obstructions within the lines of sight shall be approved by the City Engineer. b. Local residential street intersections shall have their noticeability improved, usually by moving the 2 +/- close st st reet trees on each side away from t he street and placed in a street tree easement. 8. A permit shall be obtained from CALTRANS for any work within the following right-of-way: 9. All public improvements on the following streets shall be operationally complete pdor to the issuance of building permits: Completion Dale: __/ / /___/ ~ / __/ / .__/ / N. Public Maintenance Areas 1. A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards sh.all be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to final map approval or fssuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. The following landscape parkways, medians, paseos, easements, trails, or other areas are required to be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance District: _J / 2. A signed consent and waiver fomq to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting DistriCts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be pome by the developer. ~ / 4. Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective Beautification Master Plan: 3. All required public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained bythe _._J / developer until accepted by the City. __/ / O. Drainage and Flood Control 1. The project (or portions thereof) is iocateq within a Flood Hazard Zone; therefore, flood protection measures shall be provided as certified by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer. 2. It shall be the deveioper's responsibility to have the current FIRM Zone designation removed from the project area. The developer's engineer shall prepare all necessary reports, plans, and hydrologic/hydraullo calculations. A Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) shall be obtained from FEMA prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) shall be issued by FEMA prior to occupancy or improvement acceptance, whichever occurs first. ,so- 10/94 3. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. 11 .._/ / .__/ / 4. A permit from the County Flood Control District is required for work within its right-of-way. 5. Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk. 6. Public storm drain easements shall be graded to convey overflows in the event of a blockage in a sump catch basin on the public street. P. Utilities ,/ 1.Provide separate utility services to each pamel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. __/ / __/ / __/ / _._/ ! 2. The developer shall be responsible for the rolocation of existing utilities as necessary. ._J / 3.Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the ---J----/ Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bemardino. A letter of compliance from the CCWD is required pdor to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs firsl. Q. General Requlraments and Approvals 1. The separate parcels contained within the project beundades shall be legally combined into ~ / one parcel prior to issuance of building permits. 2. An easement for a joint use driveway shall be provided prior to final map approval or .--] / issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first, for: 3. Prior to approval of the final map a deposit shell be posted with the City covedng the estimated cost of apportioning the assessments under Assessment District among the newly created parcels. 4. Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Regional Mainline, Secondary Regional, and Master Plan Drainage Fees shall be paid prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance it no map is involved. ~ / __.J / 5. Permits shall be obtained from the following agencies for work within their right-of-way: __J / 6. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the Law Enforcement Community .Facilities Distdct shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to f nal map approval or the ~ssuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be berne by the Developer. 7. Prior to finalizatidn of any development phase, sufficient improvement plans shall be com- pleted beyond the phase boundaries to assure secondary access and drainage protection to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Phase boundaries shall correspond to lot lines shown on the approved tentative map. _.J / ~ / .1. Mello Rcos Community Facilities District requirements shall apply to this project. sc- ~0/94 12 ,/ 2. Fire flow requirement shall be A. A previous fire flow, conducted gpm available at 20 psi. ~'B. t/'C. gallons per minute. revealed __J / A fire flow shall be conducted by the builder/developer and witnessed by fire department personnel prior to water plan approval. For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional fire flow lest of the on-site hydrants shall be conducted by the builder/developer and witnessed by the fire department personnel after construction and prior to occupancy. t/' 3. Fire hydrants are required. All required public or on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed.--/ / and opsrable priorto deliven/of any combustible building materials on site (i.e., lumber, roofing materials, etc,). Hydrants flushing shall be witnessed by fire department personnel. V/ 4~Existingfirehydrant~~cati~nsshal~bepr~vldedprlort~waterp~anappr~va~~Requiredhydrants~ / / it any, will be determined by this department. Fire District standards require a 6" dser with a 4" and a 2-1/2" outlet. Substandard hydrants shall be upgraded to meet this standard. Contact the Fire Safety Division for speciticatlons on approved brands and model numbers. V/ 5. Prior to the issuance of building permits for combustible construction ,evidence shall be .__/. / submitted to the Fire Distdct that te roperan/water supply for fire protection is available, pending completion of required fire protection system. V/ 6. Hydrant reflective markere (blue dots) shall be required for all hydrants and installed prior to ---/ / final inspection. v' --J / .7. An automatic fire extinguishing system(s) will be required as noted below: I//Per Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance 15. Other ,/ Note: Special sprinklerdensities are required for such hazardous operations as woodworking, plastics manufacuhhg, spray painting, flammable liquids storage, high piled stock, etc. Contact Fire Safety Division to determine if sprinkler system is adequate Ior proposed operations. 8. Sprinkler system monifodng shall be installed and operational immediately upon completion of sprinkler system. 9. A fire alarm system(s) shall be required as noted below: Per Rancho Cucamanga Fire Protection District Ordinance 15. California Code Regulations Title 24. NFPA 101. Other ~ / .__/ / 10. Roadways within project shall comply with the Fire Distdcrs fire lane standards, as noted: All roadways. Other / / 11. Fire department access shall be amended to facilitate emergency apparatus. 12. Emergency secondary access shall be provided in accordance with Fire District standards. 13. Emergency access shall be provided, maintenance tree and clear, a minimum of 26 feet wide at all times dudng construction in accordance with Fire District requirem, ents. 14. All trees planted in any median shall be kept trimmed a minimum of 14'6" from ground up so as not to impede fire apparatus. 15. A building directory shall be required, as noted below: Lighted director within 20 feet of main entrance(s). Standard Directory in main lobby. Other 16. A Knox rapid entry key vault shall be installed prior to final inspection. Proof of purchase shall be submitted prior to final beiiding plan approval. Contact the Fire Safety Division for specific details and ordering information. V/' .17. Gate{l/rastricted entry(s) require installation of a Knox rapid entry key system. Contact the Fire Safety Division for specific details and ordering ihtormatlon. 18. A tenant use letter shall be submitted prior to final building plan approval. v/ 19. Plan check fees in the amount of $ ~ have been paid. An additional $ (o~. -- shall be paid: v" Prior to water plan approval. I/' Prior to final plan approval. Note: Separate plan check fees for fire protection systems (sprinklers, hood systems, alarms. etc.) and/or any consuitaht reviews will be assessed upon submittal of plans. 20. Special permits may be required, depending on intended use, as noted below: .. v" A. General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or oparatidn not specifically described below, which in the judgement of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions hazardous to life or property. B. Storage of readily combustible material. D. E. F. G. Places of assembly (except churches, schools and other non-profit organizations) Bowling alley and pin refinishing. Cellulose Nitrate plastic (Pyroxylin). Combustible fibers storage and handling exceeding 100 cubic feet. Garages Motor vehicle repair (H-4) sc - Lumber yards (over 100,000 board feet).E C::~,~ 14 _.J / J / /__J _J / __/ / .__/ / I / / /___/¸ M. N. O. v/p. V/Q. R. V/S. T. '/'U. V. W. Tire rebuilding plants. Auto wrecking yards. Junk or waste material handling plants, Flammable finishes. Spraying or dipping operations, spray booths, dip tanIs, electrostatic apparatus, aulomobile undercoating, powder coaling and organic peroxides and dual com- penent coatings (per spray booth). Magnesium (mare tha 10 pounds per day). Oil burning equipment operations. Ovens (industrial baking and drying). Mechanical refrigeration (over 20 peunts of mfrigerant). Compressed gases (store, handle or use exceeding 100 cubic feet), Cryogenic fluids (storage, handling or use). Dust-producing processes and equipment. Flammable and combustible liquids (storage, handling or use). High piled combustible mock. Liquified petroleum gas (store, handle, transport or use more than 120 gallons). Matches (more than 60 Matchman's gross). Welding and cutting operations: to conduct welding and/or cutting operations in any occupancy. sc- ~0/94 ¼! / \ [] I I.