Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2017/10/04 - Agenda Packet
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AGENDAS FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD — HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY — SUCCESSOR AGENCY — PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY - CITY COUNCIL WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 4, 2017 REGULAR MEETINGS: 1st d 3rd Wednesdays - 7:00 P.M. ORDER OF BUSINESS: CLOSED SESSION Tapia Conference Room REGULAR MEETINGS Council Chambers MEMBERS: MAYOR MAYOR PRO TEM COUNCIL MEMBERS L. Dennis Michael Lynne B. Kennedy William Alexander Sam Spagnolo Diane Williams 5:00 P.M. 7:00 P.M. CITY MANAGER CITY ATTORNEY CITY CLERK CITY TREASURER John R. Gillison James L. Markman Janice C. Reynolds James C. Frost Rancho Cucamonga City Council Mission Statement Make decisions, and be perceived as making decisions, for the general welfare of the community. Always work to improve existing services and develop policies to meet the expected as well as anticipated needs of the community. Work together cooperatively to respect all persons and their ideas in order to develop and maintain the trust of the community. Reflect the community's desires and priorities by assuring that decisions accurately reflect the community's interests by fairly translating public feedback into public policy. Enhance the quality of life of all Rancho Cucamonga residents through the continued pursuit of excellence and commitment to the City's core values and goals. Set the vision for the community for the future. Have a professional, objective, and respectful relationship with each other in order to more effectively address the challenges of the future. INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC ..Ailekio eoCAMONGA TO ADDRESS THE FIRE BOARD, HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL The Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council encourage free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the Agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council by filling out a speaker card and submitting it to the City Clerk. The speaker cards are located on the wall at the back of the Chambers, at the front desk behind the staff table and at the City Clerk's desk. Any handouts for the Fire Board, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority or City Council should be given to the City Clerk for distribution. During "Public Communications," your name will be called to speak on any item listed or not listed on the agenda in the order in which it was received. The "Public Communications" period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these business items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the agenda commences. Any other "Public Communications" which have not concluded during this one-hour period may resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. If you are present to speak on an "Advertised Public Hearing" or on an "Administrative Hearing" Item(s), your name will be called when that item is being discussed, in the order in which it was received. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. AGENDA BACK-UP MATERIALS Staff reports and back-up materials for agenda items are available for review at the City Clerk's counter, the City's Public Libraries and on the City's website. A complete copy of the agenda is also available at the desk located behind the staff table during the Council meeting. LIVE BROADCAST Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council meetings are broadcast live on Channel 3 for those with cable television access. Meetings are rebroadcast on the second and fourth Wednesdays of each month at 11:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. Streaming Video on Demand is available on the City's website at www.cityofrc.us/cityhall/council/videos.asp. The Fire Board, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council meet regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive. Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, and Public Financing Authority. Copies of the agendas and minutes can be found @ www.cityofrc.us If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's office at (909) 477-2700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. Please silence all cell phones and devices while the meeting is in session. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA OCTOBER 4, 2017 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 5:00 P.M. — CLOSED SESSION CALL TO ORDER — TAPIA CONFERENCE ROOM Roll CaII: Mayor Michael Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy Council Members Alexander, Spagnolo and Williams CLOSED SESSION CALLED TO ORDER AS THE CITY COUNCIL. A. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) C. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS (NO DISCUSSION OR ACTION WILL OCCUR) D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION — TAPIA CONFERENCE ROOM D1. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR ROBERT NEIUBER, HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54954.2 REGARDING LABOR NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEE GROUP. — CITY D2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(A) — SOUTHWEST VOTERS REGISTRATION EDUCATION PROJECT AND LOUISA OLLAGUE V. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; CASE NO. CIVRS 1603632. — CITY D3. CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT 6230 HAVEN AVE. (APN: 0201-321-14-0000), AND 8590 MALVERN AVE. (APN: 0209-041-54-0000); NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND STEVE PONTELL, PRESIDENT AND CEO, NATIONAL COMMUNITY RENAISSANCE; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS. — HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY D4. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — PENDING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(A) — LAURA LOPEZ; SARYNA LOPEZ; AND M.L. VS. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, CASE NUMBER CIVDS 1613264 - CITY Page 1 of 6 OCTOBER 4, 2017 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA E. RECESS CLOSED SESSION TO RECESS TO THE REGULAR FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY, AND CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS AT 7:00 P.M. IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS AT CITY HALL, LOCATED AT 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. REGULAR MEETING CALL TO ORDER — 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS THE REGULAR MEETINGS OF THE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY, AND CITY COUNCIL WILL BE CALLED TO ORDER. IT IS THE INTENT TO CONCLUDE THE MEETINGS BY 10:00 P.M., UNLESS EXTENDED BY CONCURRENCE OF THE FIRE BOARD, AGENCIES, AUTHORITY BOARD AND COUNCIL. Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call: Mayor Michael Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy Council Members Alexander, Spagnolo and Williams A. ANNOUNCEMENT / PRESENTATIONS Al. Presentation of the 2017 Helen Putnam Award from the League of California Cities in the category of Enhancing Public Trust, Ethics, and Community Involvement to the Community Services Department for Los Amigos Park. A2. Presentation by the Cucamonga Valley Water District on their Environmental Learning Center partnership with the City. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Council on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Mayor, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Fire Board, Agencies, Successor Agency, Authority Board, or City Council not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these business items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the Page 2 of 6 OCTOBER 4, 2017 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA agenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this one hour period may resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed. CONSENT CALENDARS: The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non -controversial. They will be acted upon by the Fire Board/Housing Successor Agency/Successor Agency/Authority Board/Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Fire Board/Housing Successor Agency/Successor Agency/Authority Board/Council Member for discussion. C. CONSENT CALENDAR — FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 01. Consideration of Minutes: September 20, 2017 (Regular Meeting) C2. Consideration to approve Check Register dated September 12, 2017 through September 26, 2017 for the total of $351,938.68. 1 C3. Consideration to extend the contract agreement with Medley Fire for Fire Suppression Services for all Fire Stations (CO# 14-239) and approve the spending limit of $8,000 annually; not to exceed $32,000 11 over a four-year period. D. CONSENT CALENDAR — HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY D1. Consideration of Minutes: September 20, 2017 (Regular Meeting) E. CONSENT CALENDAR — SUCCESSOR AGENCY El. Consideration of Minutes: September 20, 2017 (Regular Meeting) F. CONSENT CALENDAR — PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY F1. Consideration of Minutes: September 20, 2017 (Regular Meeting) G. CONSENT CALENDAR — CITY COUNCIL G1. Consideration of Minutes: September 20, 2017 (Special and Regular Meeting) G2. Consideration to approve Check Register and Payroll dated September 12, 2017 through September 44 26, 2017 for the total of $7,755,085.92. G3. Consideration to receive and file a report in conformance with California Government Code 65858 on 54 measures taken to alleviate the need for Interim Ordinance 900-A. G4. Consideration to purchase "Pesticides and Fertilizer Supplies on an As Needed Basis" from Univar Environmental Services, Target Specialty Products, and Wilbur -Ellis Company in an amount not to 62 exceed $140,000 for Fiscal Year 17/18. Page3of6 OCTOBER 4, 2017 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA G5. Consideration to extend the award for the purchase of "Irrigation Parts and Supplies on an As Needed Basis" from SiteOne Landscape Supply, Logans Marketing, and Pool & Electrical Products, Inc. in an 79 amount not to exceed $120,000 annually for a maximum of $240,000 over a two-year period. G6. Consideration to extend the contract agreement with Medley Fire for Citywide Fire Suppression Services (CO#14-239) and approve the spending limit of $41,900 annually; not to exceed $167,600 92 over a four-year period. G7. Consideration of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security, and to order the Annexation to the Landscape Maintenance District No. 3b and Street Light Maintenance Districts Nos. 1 and 6 related to the development of a warehouse at the northwest corner of Hermosa Avenue and 6th Street (Case No. DRC2016-00522), submitted by Phelan Development Company, LLC. 124 RESOLUTION NO. 17-095 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE 127 DISTRICT NO. 3B (COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL MAINTENANCE DISTRICT) FOR PROJECT CASE NO. DRC2016-00522 RESOLUTION NO. 17-096 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS) FOR PROJECT CASE NO. DRC2016-00522 RESOLUTION NO. 17-097 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL) FOR PROJECT CASE NO. DRC2016-00522 132 137 G8. Consideration to receive and file a letter of approval for Sunday Commercial Waste Collection Service. 142 H. CONSENT ORDINANCES The following Ordinances have been introduced for First Reading. Second Readings are expected to be routine and non -controversial. The City Council will act upon them at one time without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be removed for discussion by a Council Member. No items. I. ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING ITEM Speaker cards may be submitted for all those who wish to speak on the following topic. The following item has no legal publication or posting requirements. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Mayor, depending upon the number of individuals wishing to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the City Council, not to members of the audience. No items. Page 4 of 6 OCTOBER 4, 2017 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA J. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS CITY COUNCIL The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Mayor will open the meeting to receive public testimony. J1. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2016-00206 - PACIFIC SUMMIT FOOTHILL, LLC - A REQUEST TO AMEND TABLES AND TEXT, INCLUDING CLARIFYING TEXT AS NECESSARY, IN THE GENERAL PLAN TO ALLOW THE DEVELOPMENT OF LAND THAT CONTAINS SLOPES OF 30 PERCENT OR GREATER. ON AUGUST 23, 2017, THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDED APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2016-00206 AMENDING TABLES AND TEXT, INCLUDING CLARIFYING TEXT AS NECESSARY, IN THE GENERAL PLAN TO ALLOW THE DEVELOPMENT OF LAND THAT CONTAINS SLOPES OF 30 PERCENT OR GREATER. CONSIDERATION OF AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2016-00206 AND APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP MODIFICATION SUBTT16605M, DESIGN REVIEW DRC2012-00672, VARIANCE DRC2016-00207, AND TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2012-00673 — HANK STOY — A REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE 24.19 ACRES INTO 6 PARCELS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF 175 ATTACHED CONDOMINIUM UNITS, TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM 30 -FOOT BUILDING HEIGHT, AND TO REMOVE 180 TREES IN THE MIXED USE (MU) DISTRICT, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, BETWEEN RED HILL COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE AND THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC TRAIL RIGHT-OF- WAY — APNS: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, AND 41 AND 0207-112-09 AND 10. STAFF HAS PREPARED A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS FOR CONSIDERATION. ON AUGUST 23, 2017, THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDED APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2016-00206 AND APPROVED THE RELATED APPLICATIONS CONTINGENT UPON CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF THE GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT. RESOLUTION NO. 17-098 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2016-00206 TO AMEND TABLES AND TEXT, INCLUDING CLARIFYING TEXT AS NECESSRY, IN THE GENERAL PLAN TO ALLOW THE DEVELOPMENT OF LAND THAT CONTAINS SLOPES OF 30 PERCENT OR GREATER; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF 145 475 RESOLUTION NO. 17-099 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, UPHOLDING THE DECISION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP MODIFICATION NO. 16605M, DESIGN REVIEW DRC2012-00672, VARIANCE DRC2016-00207 AND TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2012-00673, TO SUBDIVIDE 24.19 ACRES INTO 6 PARCELS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF 175 ATTACHED CONDOMINIUM UNITS, INCLUDING THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION, A VARIANCE FOR THE BUILDING 482 ENVELOPE HEIGHT AND A REQUEST TO REMOVE 180 TREES IN THE MIXED USE (MU) DISTRICT LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, BETWEEN RED HILL COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE AND PACIFIC ELECTRIC TRAIL RIGHT-OF-WAY; DENYING THE APPEAL; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, AND 41 AND 0207-112-09 AND 10 Page5of6 OCTOBER 4, 2017 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA K. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS CITY COUNCIL The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. K1. Verbal Report on the California Air Resources Board (CARB) Community Meetings about Minimizing Community Health Impacts from Freight. K2. Consideration to adopt Urgency Interim Zoning Ordinance No. 919, to require a Conditional Use Permit for new hotels in all zones for a period of 45 days. 490 URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 919 AN INTERIM ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ENACTED PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65858 493 REQUIRING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF HOTELS OR THE EXPANSION OF EXISTING HOTELS, DECLARING THE URGENCY THEREOF, AND MAKING A DETERMINATION OF EXEMPTION UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT K3. Status update regarding preparation of the North Eastern Sphere Annexation Project including General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00749, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00752, North Eastern Sphere Annexation Specific Plan DRC2015-00751, Etiwanda North Specific Plan Amendment DRC2015-00750, North Eastern Sphere Annexation DRC2015-00732, and related Environmental Impact Report. L. COUNCIL BUSINESS The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. L1. INTER -AGENCY UPDATES (Update by the City Council to the community on the meetings that were attended.) L2. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Council Member.) M. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING N. ADJOURNMENT CERTIFICATION I, Linda A. Troyan, MMC, City Clerk Services Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify under penalty of perjury that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on September 28, 2017, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and on the City's website. inda A. Troyan, MMC City Clerk Services Director City of Rancho Cucamonga Page6of6 497 ***DRAFT*** SEPTEMBER 20, 2017 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CLOSED SESSION, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETINGS MINUTES 5:00 P.M. - CLOSED SESSION CALL TO ORDER - TAPIA CONFERENCE ROOM The City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council held a closed session on Wednesday, September 20, 2017 in the Tapia Conference Room at the Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor Michael called the meeting to order at 5:OOp.m. Present were Council Members: Bill Alexander, Diane Williams, Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy and Mayor L. Dennis Michael. Absent: Council Member Spagnolo Also present were: John Gillison, City Manager; James L. Markman, City Attorney; Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services; and Jeff Bloom, Deputy City Manager/Economic and Community Development. A. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) No public communications were made. C. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS No discussion or actions were taken. D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION - TAPIA CONFERENCE ROOM D1. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR ROBERT NEIUBER, HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54954.2 REGARDING LABOR NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEE GROUP, RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION, TEAMSTERS LOCAL 1932. — CITY D2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(A) — SOUTHWEST VOTERS REGISTRATION EDUCATION PROJECT AND LOUISA OLLAGUE V. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; CASE NO. CIVRS 1603632. — CITY D3. CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT 6230 HAVEN AVE. (APN: 0201-321- 14-0000), AND 8590 MALVERN AVE. (APN: 0209-041-54-0000); NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND STEVE PONTELL, PRESIDENT AND CEO, NATIONAL COMMUNITY RENAISSANCE; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS. — HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY September 20, 20171 Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Page 1 of 8 ***DRAFT*** D4. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT 12467 BASE LINE ROAD IDENTIFIED AS PARCEL NUMBERS 1090-331-03 AND 04, AND 1089-581-04; NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND JOSEPH FILIPPI REPRESENTING FILIPPI WINERY, REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS FOR NEGOTIATING THE PRICE, TERMS OF PAYMENT, OR BOTH — CITY E. RECESS The closed session recessed at 5:50 p.m. A. SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL ONLY CALL TO ORDER - 6:00 P.M. - COUNCIL CHAMBERS The special meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on September 20, 2017 in the Council Chambers at City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor Michael called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Present were Council Members: Bill Alexander, Diane Williams, Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy and Mayor L. Dennis Michael. Absent: Council Member Spagnolo Also present were: John Gillison, City Manager; James L. Markman, City Attorney; and Linda A. Troyan, City Clerk Services Director. Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy led the Pledge of Allegiance. B. ITEMS OF BUSINESS B1. Presentation of Certificates of Recognition to Taekwondo National Poomsae Black Belt Team; Little League Baseball All-Star Teams; and RC Ace Softball All Stars. 1. USA Taekwondo Poomsae Black Belt Gold Medalist Team Mayor Michael, Members of the City Council, Park & Recreation Commission Chair Victoria Jones and Commissioner Michael Sweetland along with Caroline Cruz -Contreras, Team Representative presented Certificates of Recognition to the following team members: Trystan Haley Contreras; Chiara Francesca Flotildes; and Victoria Love Hsu. 2. Vineyard Little League 10/11 All -Stars - District 71 and Section -8 Champions Mayor Michael, Members of the City Council, Park & Recreation Commission Chair Victoria Jones and Commissioner Michael Sweetland along with Doug Morris, District 71 Little League Representative presented Certificates of Recognition to the following team members: Josh Dunn, Manager; Adam DeLeon and Marcel Fajardo, Coaches; and Team Members: Preston Anderson, Eric Burt, Aidan Cube, Jonas DeLeon, Owen Dunn, Brady Ebel, Dylan Escobar, Jackson Fajardo, Brody Foulds, Trent Jurado, Bryce McAninch, Jake Monsen, and Mason Overacker. September 20, 20171 Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Page 2 of 8 ***DRAFT*** 3. Citrus Little League Senior All -Stars - District 71 Champions Mayor Michael, Members of the City Council, Park & Recreation Commission Chair Victoria Jones and Commissioner Michael Sweetland along with Doug Morris, District 71 Little League Representative, presented Certificates of Recognition to the following team members: Armando Bermudez, Manager; Jeff Albright and Alex Bermudez, Coaches; and Team Members: Gavin Albright, John Allbecker, Ethan Bermudez, Gregory Clavesilla, Andrew Flores, Jacob Gabaldon, Alonzo Gonzalez, Dominic Gonzalez, Hayden Hernandez, Gage Lahr, Matthew Leon, Gerardo Martinez, and Joseph Torres. 4. Deer Canyon Little League Junior All -Stars - District 71 and Section -8 Champions Mayor Michael, Members of the City Council, Park & Recreation Commission Chair Victoria Jones and Commissioner Michael Sweetland along with Doug Morris, District 71 Little League Representative, presented Certificates of Recognition to the following team members: Eddie Bustamante, Manager; Scott Conaway and Rudy Maldonado, Coaches; Team Members: Blake Boggs, Gabe Bustamante, Aidan Conaway, Elijah Johnson, Mason Kidder, Gabe Lara, Alva Lee, Raquel Maldonado, Dylan Mead, Rudy Ortiz, Korey Reed, Cole Seanoa and Robby Wheeler. 5. RC Ace Softball 8U Gold All-Star Team — USA Softball State Tournament 3rd place & Northeast District Champions Mayor Michael, Members of the City Council, Park & Recreation Commission Chair Victoria Jones and Commissioner Michael Sweetland along with Lolita Harper, Rancho Cucamonga Ace Softball Board Member presented Certificates of Recognition to the following team members: Mark Reel, Manager; Charles Baum, Rigo Diaz, Ricky Mena, Tony Munoz, Jackie Wright and Rudy Maldonado; Team Members: Charlotte Baum, Logan Bester, Nicole Diaz, Caylee Lewis, Maryann Mena, Aryana Munoz, Jaylen Peraza, Peyton Reel, Sophia Tice, Jordin Washington, Jemma Wright and Sophie Zabala. 6. RC Ace Softball 6U All-Star Team — All-Star Summer of Championships Mayor Michael, Members of the City Council, Park & Recreation Commission Chair Victoria Jones and Commissioner Michael Sweetland along with Lolita Harper, Rancho Cucamonga Ace Softball Board Member presented Certificates of Recognitions to the following team members: Greg Galindo, Manager; Miguel Aleman, Rob Contreras, Jeff Falomir, Lalo Gutierrez, Nick Transito and Juan Vasquez, Coaches; Team Members: Kayleen Aleman, Aubree Almeda, Brooklyn Burley, Nevaeh Contreras, Bianca Falomir, Zoey Galindo, Alyssa Gutierrez, Peyton Rachuy Mischin, Elise Pina, Aubree Reyes, Amberly Transito and Alicia Vasquez. Mayor Michael congratulated and thanked the teams, volunteers and Park & Recreation Commissioners for their dedication and commitment. B2. PUBLIC COMMUNICATION ON ITEM LISTED ON THE SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA. No Public Communications were made. C. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Michael adjourned the Special Meeting at 6:43 p.m. September 20, 20171 Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Page 3 of 8 ***DRAFT*** REGULAR MEETING - 7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER - COUNCIL CHAMBERS The regular meetings of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council were held on September 20, 2017 in the Council Chambers at City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor Michael called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Present were Council Members: Bill Alexander, Diane Williams, Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy and Mayor L. Dennis Michael. Absent was: Council Member Spagnolo Also present were: John Gillison, City Manager; James L. Markman, City Attorney; and Linda A. Troyan, City Clerk Services Director. Council Member Williams led the Pledge of Allegiance. A. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS Al. Presentation of a Proclamation declaring September as "Prostate Cancer Awareness Month". Mayor Michael and Members of the City Council presented a Proclamation to Shanita Perry, Founder & CEO of Team Joseph Movement and Advocate for the ZERO Cancer Foundation, declaring the month of September as "Prostate Cancer Awareness Month". A2. Presentation of the 2017 Los Angeles County Fair Community Hero Award to the Rancho Cucamonga Quakes in recognition of their 25 years of community support. Mayor Michael and Members of the City Council presented the 2017 Los Angeles County Fair Community Hero Award to Rancho Cucamonga Quakes Representatives: Grant Griddle, Vice President- General Manager; Linda Rathfon, Assistant General Manager — Groups; and Mike Lindskog, Voice of the Quakes, in recognition of their 25 years of community support. A3. Presentation of a Proclamation to the Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce recognizing October 6th, 2017 as "National Manufacturing Day". Mayor Michael and Members of the City Council presented a Proclamation to Ruby Huey, President — Chair of Citizens Business Bank; Ernie Braunwalder, Immediate Past President -Chair of Farmers Insurance & Financial Solutions; and Marlene Fulfer, Director of Operations & Membership (CEO), Members of the Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce recognizing October 6, 2017 as "National Manufacturing Day". A4. Announcing 2017 Rancho Cucamonga Fire District's Open House. Kelley Donaldson, Community Affairs Coordinator, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department, invited the public to attend the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District's Open House taking place on October 14, 2017 from 10:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. at Day Creek Fire Station. B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS Janet Walton offered a prayer. Jim Frost spoke on prostate cancer, investment schedules and shared salary information from various cities for the position of City Treasurer from a survey done in 1989. September 20, 20171 Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Page 4 of 8 ***DRAFT*** CONSENT CALENDARS C. CONSENT CALENDAR - FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT C1. Consideration of Minutes: September 6, 2017 (Regular Meeting) C2. Consideration to approve Check Register dated August 29, 2017 through September 11, 2017 and Electronic Debit Register for the month of August for the total of $753,270.40. C3. Consideration to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of August 31, 2017. MOTION: Moved by Vice -President Kennedy, seconded by Board Member Williams, to approve Consent Calendar Items C1. through C3. Motion carried, 4-1; Council Member Spagnolo, Absent. D. CONSENT CALENDAR - HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY D1. D2. Consideration of Minutes: September 6, 2017 (Regular Meeting) MOTION: Moved by Agency Member Alexander, seconded by Agency Member Williams, to approve Consent Calendar Item D1. Motion carried, 4-1; Council Member Spagnolo, Absent. E. CONSENT CALENDAR - SUCCESSOR AGENCY E1. Consideration of Minutes: September 6, 2017 (Regular Meeting) MOTION: Moved by Vice -Chair Kennedy, seconded by Agency Member Alexander, to approve Consent Calendar Item E1. Motion carried, 4-1; Council Member Spagnolo, Absent. F. CONSENT CALENDAR - PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY F1. Consideration to approve Minutes of: September 6, 2017 (Regular Meeting) MOTION: Moved by Agency Member Williams, seconded by Vice -Chair Kennedy, to approve Consent Calendar Item F1. Motion carried, 4-1; Council Member Spagnolo, Absent. G. CONSENT CALENDAR - CITY COUNCIL G1. Consideration of Minutes: September 6, 2017 (Regular Meeting) G2. Consideration to approve Check Register and Payroll dated August 29, 2017 through September 11, 2017 and Electronic Debit Register for the month of August for the total of $12,549,840.59. G3. Consideration to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of August 31, 2017. G4. Consideration to cancel the Regular Meetings of the Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council on January 3, 2018. G5. Consideration to accept and to allocate $18,000 awarded by the California State Library to directly support the Adult Literacy Tutoring Program. September 20, 20171 Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Page 5 of 8 ***DRAFT*** G6. Consideration of Amendment No. 005, the Contract with ConvergeOne for Network Maintenance and Monitoring Services for one (1) additional year in the amount of $198,620. G7. Consideration to authorize release of Maintenance Guarantee Bond for the Victoria Street Pavement Rehabilitation from Etiwanda Avenue to East City Limits Project. G8. Consideration of Professional Services Agreements for Annual On -Call Soils and Materials Testing Services. G9. Consideration of Professional Services Agreements for Annual On -Call Survey Services. G10. Consideration of Resolution No. 17-093, Declining to Establish a Procurement Target for Energy Storage Systems for the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility. RESOLUTION NO. 17-093 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLINING TO ESTABLISH A PROCUREMENT TARGET FOR ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEMS FOR THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITY G11. Consideration of a Contract to Roadway Engineering & Constructing, Inc. for the construction of the Heritage Park Handicap Parking and Pavement Rehabilitation Project and to Authorize the Appropriation of $20,000 from the Park Development and PD 85 Funds. G12. Consideration of Resolution No. 17-094, Adopting Updated Salary Schedules including the Addition of the Senior Veterinary Technician Classification. RESOLUTION NO. 17-094 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE SALARY SCHEDULES, INCLUDING THE ADDITION OF THE SENIOR VETERINARY TECHNICIAN CLASSIFICATION MOTION: Moved by Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy, seconded by Council Member Williams, to approve Consent Calendar Items G1 through G12. Motion carried, 4-1; Council Member Spagnolo, Absent. H. CONSENT ORDINANCES H1. Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance No. 917, Amending Title 8 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, Excluding Operation of Transportation Network Companies from Regulations Applicable to Taxicabs. ORDINANCE NO. 917 (2nd READING) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 8 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE, EXCLUDING OPERATION OF TRANSPORTATION NETWORK COMPANIES FROM REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO TAXICABS H2. Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance No. 918, Amending Section 2.16.030 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Pertaining to Salaries for Members of the City Council. ORDINANCE NO. 918 (2nd READING) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 2.16.030 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO SALARIES FOR MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL September 20, 20171 Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Page 6 of 8 ***DRAFT*** MOTION: Moved by Council Member Williams, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy, to waive full reading and adopt Ordinance No. 917 and 918. Linda Troyan, City Clerk Services Director, read the title of Ordinance No. 917 and 918. VOTES NOW CAST ON MOTION: Moved by Council Member Williams, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy, to waive full reading and adopt Ordinance No. 917 and 918. Motion carried, 4-1; Council Member Spagnolo, Absent. I. ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING ITEM No Items. J. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS CITY COUNCIL No Items. K. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS CITY COUNCIL K1. Consideration of the City's Fiber Optic Master Plan. City Manager Gillison introduced Fred Lyn, Utility Division Manager, who gave the staff report. MOTION: Moved by Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy, seconded by Council Member Williams, to determine that the Fiber Optic Master Plan project is categorically exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per Section 15301 and 15305 and adopt the Fiber Optic Master Plan prepared by Magellan Advisors. Motion carried, 4-1; Council Member Spagnolo, Absent. K2. Presentation of the Updated RC2Go Mobile Application. City Manager Gillison introduced Darryl Polk, Director/Chief Innovation Officer, who gave the staff report. Mayor Michael and Members of the City Council received and filed the report. L. COUNCIL BUSINESS L1. Consideration of the City Council Library Subcommittee's recommendation to appoint a new member to the Library Board of Trustees. On behalf of the Library Sub -Committee, Council Member Williams thanked Mr. Robert Coberly, previous Board Member, for his long term service to the community and library. Council Member Williams and Mayor Pro -Tem Kennedy interviewed applicants and recommended Mary Hannah be appointed to the Library Board of Trustees. MOTION: Moved by Council Member Williams, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy, to approve the appointment of Mary Hannah to the Library Board of Trustees for a four year term. Motion carried, 4-1; Council Member Spagnolo, Absent. L2. Consideration of Resolution No. 17-095, Adjusting the Salary of the City Treasurer and City Clerk. RESOLUTION NO. 17-095 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADJUSTING THE SALARY OF THE CITY TREASURER AND CITY CLERK AND REPEALING RESOLUTIONS 84-84 AND 84-84A September 20, 20171 Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Page 7 of 8 ***DRAFT*** City Manager Gillison reported that the item was brought forward at the request of Council at their last meeting. The salary adjustment is the same percentage the Council received recently. Staff to bring a report back at a future date on a comparison of City Clerk/City Treasurer salaries in other cities. MOTION: Moved by Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy, seconded by Council Member Williams, to approve staff's recommendation. Motion carried, 4-1; Council Member Spagnolo, Absent. L3. INTER -AGENCY UPDATES Council Member Williams reported on her attendance at a Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) hearing that morning. L4. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS None. M. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING N. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Michael adjourned the meeting at 8:25 p.m. Approved: **************** Respectfully submitted, Linda A. Troyan, MMC City Clerk Services Director September 20, 20171 Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Page 8 of 8 of FRIENDSHIP is the only mai/ex& that will ever hold OWORLD TOGETHER. -Woodrow Wilson Upcycling Raw Material - AA Cucamonga Valley, Water District Service Beyond Expectation Cucamonga Valley Water District Student Education Programs Partnership Recap PRESENTATION TO THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL Who is CVWD? Cucamonga Valley t Nater District Service Beyond Expectation Our Mission: To provide high quality, safe and reliable water and wastewater services, while good stewardship of natural and financial resources CVWD Service Area: City of Rancho Cucamonga,theVillage of Heritage in Fontana, of Ontario and Upland, and some unincorporated areas of San Bernardino County CVWD offers education programs, teacher resources and materials and is actively involved in community events. practicing portions Current Partners ➢ City of Rancho Cucamonga ➢ Inland Empire Resource Conservation District ➢ Arrowhead Mountain Spring Water ➢ Edison International RANCHO CUCAMONGA I► LA N D Elul P I R E Pd RESOURCE CONSERVATION DIS'A16T ARROWHEAD -o-r,,ppNTM1LN SI RIlL k'I, LLH 7 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON' An EDISON INTERNATIONALR: Company History of Partnership 10 years educating the community Numerous programs and tours since 2007 Thousands of Rancho Cucamonga residents and students Cucamonga ValleY. Wateter District Service Beyond Expectation Vp. A Environmental Learning Center Developed to provide students with a hands-on environmental -focused field trip Opened in 2006 Educated over 15,000 students grades 1 St through 6th Activities: Water Cycle States of Water Vermicomposting Growing Native It's Nice to Use it Twice Water Treatment Plant Tours Succulent Garden Make a Rainstick Enviroscape Tap Water Challenge Water -Borne Lab Owl Pellet Dissection Cucamonga Valley t Nater District Service Beyond Expectation 2016-2017 ELC Recap • Over 400 students participated in the City's Reusing and Recycling, through It's Nice to Use • City staff dedicated 50 hours of staff time to education on Reducing, it Twice environmental The City provided giveaways for over 1,400 students rnwu toes Cucamonga Valley t Nater District Service Beyond Expectation Plans for 2017-2018 Environmental Learning Center: Field Trip Calendar is open! Expect 1,500 students this year Integration of iPad technology Continue hands-on, experimental learning Career exploration for 5th grade and up Grant & scholarship opportunities ACucamonga Val ley: 1Nater District Service Beyond Expectation Cucamonga Valley t Nater District RANCHO Service Beyond Expectation CUCAMONGA Thank you City of Rancho Cucamonga! For your support and commitment to educate the students of our community! For additional resources of questions: CVWDwater.com OR Facebook.com/CVWDwater Joanna Gonzalez Community Outreach Representative JoannaG(a7CVWDwater.com (909) 483-7464 Kristeen Farlow Communications & Outreach Manager Kristeen F(c�CVW Dwater.com (909) 987-2591 2 01 6 for educating our community Cucamonga Valley. District Service Beyond Expectation P thetrontierproject RECAP SUMMARY Since 2006, the Environmental Learning Center (ELC) has educated over 15,000 students from the Rancho Cucamonga region. Thanks to a shared vision of environmental education, the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Environmental Programs Division established itself as one of the ELC's Education Partners early on, and has greatly contributed to enhancing environmental awareness in our community. The City's contributions have resulted in enhancing the environmental education of those who live, work, and play in the region. Teachers and educators throughout the Inland Empire look forward to scheduling a field trip to the ELC, resulting in a fully booked field trip calendar for the past 5 years. Thanks to the ongoing partnership, the ELC continues to be a fun, interactive educational opportunity for students from kindergarten through sixth grade. 2016-2017 SCHOOL YEAR ACHIEVEMENTS INCLUDE: THANK YOU! • 31 field trips to CVWD's Environmental Learning Center- equaling nearly 1,400 students educated on environmental topics; • During 2016-2017 school year, City of RC educated over 400 students! • City of RC provided giveaways for all students, including rulers, pencils and seeds (cucumber, carrots, radishes); • City of RC dedicated 50 hours of staff time to environmental education! It's Nice to Use it Twice: Learning about natural resources & conservation EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP WITH CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA The ELC field trip offers opportunities to create lifelong learners by allowing students to step out of the classroom and learn about science. Students literally get their hands dirty (in soil and owl pellets!) as they learn about the water cycle, life cycle, natural resources, recycling, vermicomposting, microorganisms, water quality, and much more. During the 2016-2017 school year, the partnership with City of Rancho Cucamonga was very successful as field trip requests for 'It's Nice to Use it Twice' increased significantly. City staff taught students every Thursday from October 2016 through February 2017. This resulted in over400 Kindergarten through 6th grade students educated on natural resources, recycling, and re -using materials. EDUCATING THE NEXT GENERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDS THANK YOU OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA! The Cucamonga Valley Water District appreciates the City's support and commitment to educate the students in our community this past year. We look forward to educating more students for the upcoming school year through our education partnership with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Programs Division. PLANS FOR 2017 - 2018 SCHOOL YEAR The Cucamonga Valley Water District anticipates educating over 1,400 students in the upcoming school year! RAM IIO CI TCANIONCA Cucamonga Valley: Water District Service Beyond Expectation F P - i::frontier • Integration of new iPad technology • Integration of energy conservation concepts • Continued hands-on, experimental learning • Career exploration for 5th grade and up • Grant & Scholarship opportunities CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 9/12/2017 through 9/26/2017 P1 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name _c_i Fire Amount AP 00007333 09/13/2017 BUREAU OF RECLAMATION 873.07 0.00 873.07 AP 00007334 09/13/2017 CALIF GOVERNMENT VEBA/RANCHO CUCAMONGA 11,370.00 0.00 11,370.00 AP 00007335 09/13/2017 EXELON GENERATION CO. LLC. 201,482.20 0.00 201,482.20 AP 00007336 09/13/2017 POWEREX CORP 6,485.60 0.00 6,485.60 AP 00007337 09/13/2017 RCCEA 1,850.50 0.00 1,850.50 AP 00007338 09/13/2017 RCPFA 11,400.32 0.00 11,400.32 AP 00007339 09/20/2017 RE ASTORIA 2 LLC 41,933.55 0.00 41,933.55 AP 00007340 09/20/2017 RIVERSIDE, CITY OF 6,484.00 0.00 6,484.00 AP 00007341 09/20/2017 SAN BERNARDINO CTY SHERIFFS DEPT 2,927,876.00 0.00 2,927,876.00 AP 00007342 09/26/2017 AHUMADA, ALEXANDER R 0.00 651.52 651.52 AP 00007343 09/26/2017 ALMAND, LLOYD 0.00 651.52 651.52 AP 00007344 09/26/2017 BANTAU, VICTORIA 0.00 651.52 651.52 AP 00007345 09/26/2017 BAZAL, SUSAN 0.00 240.93 240.93 AP 00007346 09/26/2017 BELL, MICHAEL L. 0.00 1,303.76 1,303.76 AP 00007347 09/26/2017 BERRY, DAVID 0.00 1,019.78 1,019.78 AP 00007348 09/26/2017 BROCK, ROBIN 0.00 977.64 977.64 AP 00007349 09/26/2017 CAMPBELL, GERALD 0.00 746.37 746.37 AP 00007350 09/26/2017 CAMPBELL, STEVEN 0.00 1,407.17 1,407.17 AP 00007351 09/26/2017 CARNES, KENNETH 0.00 472.96 472.96 AP 00007352 09/26/2017 CLABBY, RICHARD 0.00 1,019.78 1,019.78 AP 00007353 09/26/2017 CLOUGHESY, DONALD R 0.00 1,733.29 1,733.29 AP 00007354 09/26/2017 CORCORAN, ROBERT 0.00 587.88 587.88 AP 00007355 09/26/2017 COX, KARL 0.00 651.52 651.52 AP 00007356 09/26/2017 CRANE, RALPH 0.00 1,020.45 1,020.45 AP 00007357 09/26/2017 CROSSLAND, WILBUR 0.00 472.96 472.96 AP 00007358 09/26/2017 DAGUE, JAMES 0.00 1,303.76 1,303.76 AP 00007359 09/26/2017 DE ANTONIO, SUSAN 0.00 587.88 587.88 AP 00007360 09/26/2017 DEANS, JACKIE 0.00 630.69 630.69 AP 00007361 09/26/2017 DOMINICK, SAMUEL A. 0.00 977.64 977.64 AP 00007362 09/26/2017 EAGLESON, MICHAEL 0.00 1,303.76 1,303.76 AP 00007363 09/26/2017 EGGERS, BOB 0.00 1,733.29 1,733.29 AP 00007364 09/26/2017 FRITCHEY, JOHN D. 0.00 472.96 472.96 AP 00007365 09/26/2017 HEYDE, DONALD 0.00 1,303.76 1,303.76 AP 00007366 09/26/2017 INTERLICCHIA, ROSALYN _ 0.00 261.76 261.76 AP 00007367 09/26/2017 KILMER, STEPHEN 0.00 1,364.11 1,364.11 AP 00007368 09/26/2017 LANE, WILLIAM 0.00 1,303.76 1,303.76 AP 00007369 09/26/2017 LEE, ALLAN J. 0.00 1,300.86 1,300.86 AP 00007370 09/26/2017 LENZE, PAUL E 0.00 1,223.96 1,223.96 AP 00007371 09/26/2017 LONGO, JOE 0.00 172.48 172.48 AP 00007372 09/26/2017 LUTTRULL, DARRELL 0.00 472.96 472.96 AP 00007373 09/26/2017 MACKALL, BEVERLY 0.00 445.89 445.89 AP 00007374 09/26/2017 MAYFIELD, RON 0.00 1,389.38 1,389.38 AP 00007375 09/26/2017 MCKEE, JOHN 0.00 651.52 651.52 AP 00007376 09/26/2017 MCNEIL, KENNETH 0.00 651.52 651.52 AP 00007377 09/26/2017 MICHAEL, L. DENNIS 0.00 977.64 977.64 AP 00007378 09/26/2017 MORGAN, BYRON 0.00 2,317.74 2,317.74 AP 00007379 09/26/2017 MYSKOW, DENNIS 0.00 1,019.78 1,019.78 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 1 Current Date: 09/27/2017 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 07:51:08 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 9/1 2/201 7 through 9/26/2017 P2 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name fi_ Fire Amount AP 00007380 09/26/2017 NAUMAN, MICHAEL 0.00 472.96 472.96 AP 00007381 09/26/2017 NEE, RON 0.00 630.69 630.69 AP 00007382 09/26/2017 NELSON, MARY JANE 0.00 172.48 172.48 AP 00007383 09/26/2017 O'BRIEN, TOM 0.00 1,733.29 1,733.29 AP 00007384 09/26/2017 PLOUNG, MICHAEL J 0.00 579.26 579.26 AP 00007385 09/26/2017 POST, MICHAEL R 0.00 1,628.59 1,628.59 AP 00007386 09/26/2017 PROULX, PATRICK 0.00 1,733.29 1,733.29 AP 00007387 09/26/2017 ROEDER, JEFF 0.00 1,303.76 1,303.76 AP 00007388 09/26/2017 SALISBURY, THOMAS 0.00 651.52 651.52 AP 00007389 09/26/2017 SMITH, RONALD 0.00 472.96 472.96 AP 00007390 09/26/2017 SPAGNOLO, SAM 0.00 472.96 472.96 AP 00007391 09/26/2017 SPAIN, WILLIAM 0.00 746.37 746.37 AP 00007392 09/26/2017 SULLIVAN, JAMES 0.00 472.96 472.96 AP 00007393 09/26/2017 TAYLOR, STEVE 0.00 1,629.55 1,629.55 AP 00007394 09/26/2017 TULEY, TERRY 0.00 1,303.76 1,303.76 AP 00007395 09/26/2017 VANDERKALLEN, FRANCIS 0.00 1,064.00 1,064.00 AP 00007396 09/26/2017 VARNEY, ANTHONY 0.00 977.64 977.64 AP 00007397 09/26/2017 WALTON, KEVIN 0.00 1,364.11 1,364.11 AP 00007398 09/26/2017 YOWELL, TIMOTHY A 0.00 1,389.38 1,389.38 AP 00383581 09/13/2017 10-8 RETROFIT INC. 586.09 0.00 586.09 AP 00383582 09/13/2017 10-8 RETROFIT INC. 581.55 0.00 581.55 AP 00383583 09/13/2017 A & A AUTOMOTIVE AND TIRE INC. 2,333.24 0.00 2,333.24 AP 00383584 09/13/2017 ACTION AWARDS INC. 882.47 0.00 882.47 AP 00383585 09/13/2017 AFLAC GROUP INSURANCE 40.97 0.00 40.97 AP 00383586 09/13/2017 ALBERTSON, MICHAEL 0.00 20.41 20.41 AP 00383587 09/13/2017 ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT 403,716.45 0.00 403,716.45 AP 00383588 09/13/2017 ALPHAGRAPHICS 376.55 0.00 376.55 AP 00383589 09/13/2017 ASSI SECURITY 1,305.00 0.00 1,305.00 AP 00383590 09/13/2017 BARNES AND NOBLE 124.02 0.00 124.02 AP 00383591 09/13/2017 BAUER COMPRESSORS 0.00 3,929.87 3,929.87 AP 00383592 09/13/2017 BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS TRAINING INSTITUTE 481.00 0.00 481.00 AP 00383593 09/13/2017 BOOT BARN INC. 5,161.53 0.00 5,161.53 AP 00383594 09/13/2017 BUQUET, CHARLES 256.00 0.00 256.00 AP 00383595 09/13/2017 C V W D 150.91 0.00 150.91 AP 00383596 09/13/2017 C V W D 537.28 0.00 537.28 AP 00383597 09/13/2017 C V W D 0.00 292.20 292.20 AP 00383600 09/13/2017 C V W D 91,684.51 1,582.56 93,267.07 *** AP 00383601 09/13/2017 CAL FIRE/STATE MARSHAL 0.00 150.00 150.00 AP 00383602 09/13/2017 CAL OSHA REPORTER 395.00 0.00 395.00 AP 00383603 09/13/2017 CAL PERS LONG TERM CARE 286.21 0.00 286.21 AP 00383604 09/13/2017 CALIFORNIA BANK & TRUST 17,886.95 0.00 17,886.95 AP 00383605 09/13/2017 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 8.44 0.00 8.44 AP 00383606 09/13/2017 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 60.00 0.00 60.00 AP 00383607 09/13/2017 CAPITAL ONE COMMERCIAL 734.82 0.00 734.82 AP 00383608 09/13/2017 CAPITAL ONE COMMERCIAL 0.00 597.04 597.04 AP 00383609 09/13/2017 CCPOA REGISTRATION COMMITTEE 675.00 0.00 675.00 AP 00383610 09/13/2017 CCS ORANGE COUNTY JANITORIAL INC. 55,848.52 0.00 55,848.52 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 2 Current Date: 09/27/2017 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAITCONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 07:51:08 Check No. Check Date AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP 00383611 00383612 00383613 00383614 00383615 00383616 00383617 00383618 00383619 00383620 00383621 00383622 00383623 00383624 00383625 00383626 00383627 00383628 00383629 00383630 00383631 00383632 00383633 00383634 00383636 00383637 00383638 00383639 00383640 00383641 00383642 00383643 00383644 00383645 00383646 00383647 00383648 00383649 00383650 00383651 00383652 00383653 00383654 00383655 00383656 00383657 00383658 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 9/12/2017 through 9/26/2017 Vendor Name CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS CINTAS CORPORATION #150 CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION COMMERCIAL TRANSPORTATION SERVICES INC. COMMUNITY BANK CONVERGEONE INC. CROWN CASTLE USA INC D & D SERVICES INC. DELTA DENTAL DELTA DENTAL DEPENDABLE COFFEE INC. DUMBELL MAN FITNESS EQUIPMENT, THE EARPHONE GUY LLC, THE ECONOLITE CONTROL PRODUCTS INC ERICKSON HALL CONSTRUCTION ESTEVENE, AMADOR EXECUTIVE AUTO DETAIL EXPERIAN FASTAIRE HAND DRYERS INC. FAUST MEDIA SERVICES FONTANA RADIATOR SERVICE FORTIN LAW GROUP FRANKLIN TRUCK PARTS FRONTIER COMM FRONTIER COMM FRONTIER COMM FRONTIER COMM FRONTIER COMM G AND M BUSINESS INTERIORS GATEWAY PET CEMETERY AND CREMATORY GEOGRAPHICS GEORGE HILLS COMPANY GLOBAL PRESENTER GOODYEAR TIRE AND RUBBER CO. GRAINGER GRAYDON, RONALD GTFO GAMES LLC HILLS PET NUTRITION SALES INC HILTI INC HOSE MAN INC IECIAA INLAND VALLEY EMERGENCY PET CLINIC INTELESYS ONE INC INTERWEST CONSULTING GROUP INC JRC HOUSING JRC HOUSING C 0.00 5,637.52 2,200.28 75.00 8,509.70 21,248.23 43,325.88 1,000.00 430.00 1,605.98 41,336.68 51.00 607.86 464.94 57,723.19 0.00 500.00 1,775.00 52.00 149.23 1,823.13 0.00 12,663.97 0.00 3,639.50 728.38 398.41 744.11 2,834.53 8,349.99 725.00 774.50 1,568.38 0.00 4,995.70 1,184.65 91.30 295.00 473.37 1,036.77 41.79 395.00 297.00 3,789.25 1,330.00 7,290.00 3,595.00 Fire 1,069.80 0.00 294.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 10,831.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 121,161.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,985.39 0.00 300.32 1,800.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,221.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 775.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 P3 Amount 1,069.80 5,637.52 2,494.61 *** 75.00 8,509.70 21,248.23 54,157.35 *** 1,000.00 430.00 1,605.98 41,336.68 51.00 607.86 464.94 57,723.19 121,161.41 500.00 1,775.00 52.00 149.23 1,823.13 2,985.39 12,663.97 300.32 5,439.86 *** 728.38 398.41 744.11 2,834.53 12,571.34 *** 725.00 774.50 1,568.38 775.05 4,995.70 1,184.65 91.30 295.00 473.37 1,036.77 41.79 395.00 297.00 3,789.25 1,330.00 7,290.00 3,595.00 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 3 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PO Current Date: 09/27/2017 RTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 07:51:08 Check No. Check Date AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP 00383659 00383660 00383661 00383662 00383663 00383664 00383665 00383666 00383667 00383670 00383671 00383672 00383673 00383674 00383675 00383676 00383677 00383678 00383679 00383680 00383681 00383682 00383683 00383684 00383685 00383686 00383687 00383688 00383689 00383690 00383691 00383692 00383693 00383694 00383695 00383696 00383697 00383698 00383699 00383700 00383701 00383702 00383703 00383704 00383705 00383706 00383707 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 9/12/2017 through 9/26/2017 Vendor Name KENT HARRIS TRUCKING & MATERIALS KIMBALL MIDWEST KIWANIS CLUB OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDCARE USA LLC LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC. LEVERAGE INFORMATION SYSTEMS INC LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE LIFE ASSIST INC LOUIE'S NURSERY LOWES COMPANIES INC. LVD RANCHO CUCAMONGA LLC MARIPOSA LANDSCAPES INC MARLINK SA INC MCFADDEN DALE HARDWARE MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY MD7 MIDWEST TAPE MIJAC ALARM COMPANY MISSION REPROGRAPHICS MOORE FLOORING INC MSA INLAND EMPIRE/DESERT CHAPTER MUNSON, MICHELLE NAPA AUTO PARTS NATIONAL CNG & FLEET SERVICE NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION RENTALS INC NORMAN, BRETT NPI PRODUCTION SERVICES INC NUNNALLY, DONALD OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CTRS OF CA OCLC INC ONTARIO WINNELSON CO PETES ROAD SERVICE INC PHYSIO CONTROL INC PLUMMER, JACQUES PRE -PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC PRO -LINE INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS INC QUICK LANE TIRE & AUTO CENTER RANCHO SMOG CENTER RED WING SHOE STORE RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON ROADRUNNER PHARMACY ROTARY CORPORATION ROYAL WHOLESALE ELECTRIC SAFE -ENTRY TECHNICAL INC SAN BERNARDINO CTY SBPEA SC FUELS 1,377.76 69.61 175.00 47,734.49 1,702.46 24,993.17 3,505.00 0.00 645.16 7,424.71 600.00 27,240.28 0.00 930.96 102.18 487.00 157.53 3,224.00 84.48 104,966.22 20.00 0.00 0.00 1,300.67 120.00 0.00 52,500.00 341.30 229.41 55.41 195.56 911.66 0.00 0.00 96.59 1,817.75 242.65 210.00 2,103.35 33,719.75 679.43 301.01 1,677.18 0.00 15,096.90 1,580.95 40,737.08 P4 Fire Amount 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,606.00 4,782.48 0.00 1,287.69 0.00 0.00 162.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 155.67 377.02 0.00 0.00 370.00 0.00 0.00 247.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 30,240.00 589.53 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 34,517.94 0.00 0.00 0.00 200.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,377.76 69.61 175.00 47,734.49 1,702.46 24,993.17 5,111.00 *** 4,782.48 645.16 8,712.40 *** 600.00 27,240.28 162.00 930.96 102.18 487.00 157.53 3,224.00 84.48 104,966.22 20.00 155.67 377.02 1,300.67 120.00 370.00 52,500.00 341.30 476.84 *** 55.41 195.56 911.66 30,240.00 589.53 96.59 1,817.75 242.65 210.00 2,103.35 68,237.69 *** 679.43 301.01 1,677.18 200.00 15,096.90 1,580.95 40,737.08 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 4 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PO Current Date: 09/27/2017 RTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 07:51:08 Check No. Check Date AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP 00383708 00383709 00383710 00383711 00383712 00383715 00383716 00383717 00383718 00383719 00383720 00383724 00383725 00383726 00383727 00383728 00383729 00383730 00383731 00383732 00383733 00383734 00383735 00383736 00383737 00383738 00383739 00383740 00383741 00383742 00383743 00383744 00383745 00383746 00383747 00383748 00383749 00383750 00383751 00383752 00383755 00383756 00383758 00383759 00383760 00383761 00383762 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/14/2017 09/14/2017 09/14/2017 09/14/2017 09/14/2017 09/14/2017 09/14/2017 09/14/2017 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 9/12/2017 through 9/26/2017 Vendor Name SC FUELS SC FUELS SCHAEFER, PAUL SERRATO & ASSOCIATES SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES SHOETERIA SIGN SHOP, THE SKILLPATH SEMINARS SO CALIF GAS COMPANY SONSRAY MACHINERY LLC SOUTH COAST AQMD SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SPRINT STREAMLINE PRESS INC SUPERION LLC TARGET SUPPLIES THE COUNSELING TEAM INTERNATIONAL THOMPSON PLUMBING SUPPLY INC THOMSON REUTERS WEST PUBLISHING CORP TICKET ENVELOPE COMPANY TOVEY/SHULTZ CONSTRUCTION INC TOXGUARD FLUID TECHNOLOGIES INC U.S. BANK PARS ACCT #6746022500 U.S. BANK PARS ACCT #6746022500 U.S. BANK PARS ACCT #6746022500 UPS VALLEY POWER SYSTEMS INC VASTA, WILLIAM VERIZON BUSINESS VICTOR MEDICAL COMPANY VIRTUAL PROJECT MANAGER INC VIVERAE INC WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY WESTERN UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCE WOLFBROWN LLC YORK INSURANCE SERVICES GROUP INC ZOETIS US LLC ABC LOCKSMITHS BRODART BOOKS DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION EMCOR SERVICE EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS FASTENAL COMPANY INTERSTATE BATTERIES KME FIRE APPARATUS 2,429.83 0.00 971.25 245.00 446.95 20,129.48 0.00 149.00 1,225.49 4,610.24 1,768.04 38,283.22 49.61 78.09 0.00 225.20 102,200.92 135.46 0.00 462.88 347.55 660.00 339,852.11 787.69 19,859.85 6,605.00 1,582.96 167.97 0.00 525.00 30.03 3,739.02 500.00 1,238.40 1,136.35 330.00 1,500.00 13,791.50 179.73 530.53 1,271.93 222.99 69,718.73 194.31 72.55 85.73 0.00 P5 Fire Amount 0.00 2,429.83 804.21 804.21 0.00 971.25 0.00 245.00 0.00 446.95 0.00 20,129.48 169.92 169.92 0.00 149.00 0.00 1,225.49 0.00 4,610.24 0.00 1,768.04 2,545.95 40,829.17 *** 0.00 49.61 0.00 78.09 131.97 131.97 0.00 225.20 0.00 102,200.92 0.00 135.46 360.00 360.00 0.00 462.88 0.00 347.55 0.00 660.00 0.00 339,852.11 0.00 787.69 0.00 19,859.85 0.00 6,605.00 0.00 1,582.96 0.00 167.97 1,321.60 1,321.60 0.00 525.00 0.00 30.03 0.00 3,739.02 0.00 500.00 0.00 1,238.40 0.00 1,136.35 0.00 330.00 0.00 1,500.00 0.00 13,791.50 0.00 179.73 0.00 530.53 0.00 1,271.93 0.00 222.99 0.00 69,718.73 0.00 194.31 0.00 72.55 103.42 189.15 *** 9,600.54 9,600.54 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 5 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PO Current Date: 09/27/2017 RTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 07:51:08 Check No. Check Date AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP 00383763 00383764 00383765 00383766 00383767 00383768 00383769 00383770 00383771 00383772 00383773 00383774 00383775 00383776 00383777 00383778 00383779 00383780 00383781 00383782 00383783 00383784 00383785 00383786 00383787 00383792 00383793 00383794 00383795 00383796 00383797 00383798 00383799 00383800 00383801 00383802 00383803 00383804 00383805 00383806 00383807 00383808 00383809 00383810 00383811 00383812 00383813 09/14/2017 09/14/2017 09/14/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 9/12/2017 through 9/26/2017 Vendor Name OFFICE DEPOT ORKIN PEST CONTROL VISTA PAINT A & A AUTOMOTIVE AND TIRE INC. A AND R TIRE SERVICE A.Y. NURSERY INC. ACTION AWARDS INC. ADOBE ANIMAL HOSPITAL AFLAC GROUP INSURANCE ALBERT A. WEBB ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT ALL SPEC WELDING SOLUTIONS INC. ALLIED NETWORK SOLUTIONS INC ALLSTAR AUTO CENTER ALSHAMISI, SAIF AQUABIO ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES INC. ARROW TRAILER SUPPLIES INC AUTO AND RV SPECIALISTS INC. BERMINGHAM, GENEVIEVE G. BERNELL HYDRAULICS INC BOTROS, GEORGE BRAUER, EDWARD BRAUN BLAISING SMITH WYNNE P.C. BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERVICES INC. CVWD CVWD CABLE INC. CAJAS, THALIA CALIFORNIA, STATE OF CAMPOS, ENMA P. CARDENAS, MARIA CCS ORANGE COUNTY JANITORIAL INC. CDW GOVERNMENT INC. CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS CHEMSEARCH CHINO MOWER AND ENGINE SERVICE CINTAS CORPORATION #150 CLIENT FIRST CONSULTING GROUP CLIMATEC LLC COMMUNITY BANK COMPRESSED AIR SPECIALTIES COPIES & INK PRINTING INC. CORELOGIC SOLUTIONS LLC CORODATA MEDIA STORAGE INC CROP PRODUCTION SERVICES INC 1,215.19 234.70 232.15 1,924.62 2,706.01 271.88 17.01 200.00 6,177.54 1,187.50 47,257.75 303.86 9,964.72 618.77 64.21 1,250.00 244.43 57.92 192.00 949.20 12.85 192.00 2,660.25 54,998.72 6,736.48 120,921.61 3,738.50 54.00 1,656.00 1,900.00 64.00 5,216.20 1,090.11 3,231.77 2,310.77 0.00 526.75 50.43 0.00 8,716.17 1,350.75 1,994.75 0.00 641.87 250.00 2,227.30 1,402.80 P6 Fire Amount 710.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 937.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 668.62 0.00 0.00 232.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,099.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,925.97 234.70 232.15 1,924.62 2,706.01 271.88 17.01 200.00 6,177.54 1,187.50 47,257.75 303.86 9,964.72 618.77 64.21 1,250.00 244.43 57.92 192.00 949.20 12.85 192.00 2,660.25 54,998.72 6,736.48 121,859.38 3,738.50 54.00 1,656.00 1,900.00 64.00 5,216.20 1,090.11 3,231.77 2,310.77 668.62 526.75 50.43 232.33 8,716.17 1,350.75 1,994.75 2,099.28 641.87 250.00 2,227.30 1,402.80 *** *** User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 6 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PO Current Date: 09/27/2017 RTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 07:51:08 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 9/12/2017 through 9/26/2017 P7 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name C Fire Amount AP 00383814 09/20/2017 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 980.53 0.00 980.53 AP 00383815 09/20/2017 D M CONTRACTING INC 47,164.24 0.00 47,164.24 AP 00383816 09/20/2017 DATAMARS INC. 1,354.96 0.00 1,354.96 AP 00383817 09/20/2017 DAVISON, JD 1,238.83 0.00 1,238.83 AP 00383818 09/20/2017 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 2,249.00 0.00 2,249.00 AP 00383819 09/20/2017 DESER, ABIGAIL 1,400.00 0.00 1,400.00 AP 00383820 09/20/2017 DUMBELL MAN FITNESS EQUIPMENT, THE 150.00 0.00 150.00 AP 00383821 09/20/2017 EMBROIDME 3,150.41 0.00 3,150.41 AP 00383822 09/20/2017 ENTERSECT CORP 79.00 0.00 79.00 AP 00383823 09/20/2017 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS 0.00 126.02 126.02 AP 00383824 09/20/2017 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 12.49 0.00 12.49 AP 00383825 09/20/2017 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 29.75 0.00 29.75 AP 00383826 09/20/2017 FLATWOODS PRODUCTIONS INC 16,275.00 0.00 16,275.00 AP 00383827 09/20/2017 FLEET SERVICES INC. 0.00 200.74 200.74 AP 00383828 09/20/2017 FLINT TRADING INC 2,651.52 0.00 2,651.52 AP 00383829 09/20/2017 FOYER, MATT 192.00 0.00 192.00 AP 00383830 09/20/2017 G AND M BUSINESS INTERIORS 15,935.50 0.00 15,935.50 AP 00383831 09/20/2017 GAIL MATERIALS 1,210.47 0.00 1,210.47 AP 00383832 09/20/2017 GALE, BRIAN 833.00 0.00 833.00 AP 00383833 09/20/2017 GILKEY, JOHN 5,595.00 0.00 5,595.00 AP 00383834 09/20/2017 GOLDEN STATE RISK MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY 101,669.00 1,306.00 102,975.00 *** AP 00383835 09/20/2017 GRAINGER 640.33 0.00 640.33 AP 00383836 09/20/2017 GREAVES, JANET 192.00 0.00 192.00 AP 00383837 09/20/2017 GTFO GAMES LLC 295.00 0.00 295.00 AP 00383838 09/20/2017 GYROSCOPE INC 19,000.00 0.00 19,000.00 AP 00383839 09/20/2017 HARVEY, DOUG 192.00 0.00 192.00 AP 00383840 09/20/2017 HDL SOFTWARE LLC. 13,345.88 0.00 13,345.88 AP 00383841 09/20/2017 HENRY SCHEIN ANIMAL HEALTH SUPPLY 46.15 0.00 46.15 AP 00383842 09/20/2017 HI WAY SAFETY INC 6,029.58 0.00 6,029.58 AP 00383843 09/20/2017 HILL, MATT 0.00 26.89 26.89 AP 00383844 09/20/2017 HILLS PET NUTRITION SALES INC 441.24 0.00 441.24 AP 00383845 09/20/2017 HMC ARCHITECTS 0.00 13,185.00 13,185.00 AP 00383846 09/20/2017 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 645 2,089.35 0.00 2,089.35 AP 00383847 09/20/2017 HOSE MAN INC 16.16 0.00 16.16 AP 00383848 09/20/2017 HOSSEINIFAR, NEGAR 7.11 0.00 7.11 AP 00383849 09/20/2017 INTERNATIONAL CREATIVE MANAGEMENT PARTNEI 10,000.00 0.00 10,000.00 AP 00383850 09/20/2017 INTERNATIONAL LINE BUILDERS INC 113,523.25 0.00 113,523.25 AP 00383851 09/20/2017 KLINGER, MARY K 224.00 0.00 224.00 AP 00383852 09/20/2017 LANDCARE USA LLC 47,376.48 0.00 47,376.48 AP 00383853 09/20/2017 LANG, BRITTANY 50.84 0.00 50.84 AP 00383854 09/20/2017 LAWSON, DESIREE 29.99 0.00 29.99 AP 00383855 09/20/2017 LEIGHTON CONSULTING INC 10,323.30 0.00 10,323.30 AP 00383856 09/20/2017 LEIGHTON CONSULTING INC 4,700.00 0.00 4,700.00 AP 00383857 09/20/2017 LEON, LYDIA 48.77 0.00 48.77 AP 00383858 09/20/2017 LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS LLC 10,583.14 0.00 10,583.14 AP 00383859 09/20/2017 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 3,668.50 135.00 3,803.50 *** AP 00383860 09/20/2017 LINARES, JOSHUA 500.00 0.00 500.00 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 7 Current Date: 09/27/2017 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 07:51:08 Check No. Check Date AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP 00383861 00383862 00383863 00383864 00383865 00383866 00383867 00383868 00383869 00383870 00383871 00383872 00383873 00383874 00383875 00383876 00383877 00383878 00383879 00383880 00383881 00383882 00383883 00383884 00383885 00383886 00383887 00383888 00383889 00383890 00383891 00383892 00383893 00383894 00383895 00383896 00383897 00383898 00383899 00383900 00383901 00383902 00383903 00383904 00383905 00383906 00383911 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 9/12/2017 through 9/26/2017 Vendor Name LINNELL, SHERRY LSQ FUNDING GROUP LC MAGELLAN ADVISORS LLC MAIN STREET SIGNS MARIPOSA LANDSCAPES INC MARK CHRISTOPHER INC MC AVOY & MARKHAM MCKINNEY, ALAYA MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL INC MIJAC ALARM COMPANY MISSION REPROGRAPHICS MOORE, RACHEL MORE THAN MEETS THE EYE TOURING INC MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR NATIONAL QUARTERS NEWCOMB ANDERSON MCCORMICK INC NUNEZ, CLAUDIA OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CTRS OF CA OPTION ONE PLUMBING PEPSI -COLA PETROVICH, VICTORIA PINES MOBILE HOME PARK, THE PIONEER MANUFACTURING PRO -LINE INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS INC PSA PRINT GROUP R AND R AUTOMOTIVE RANCHO SMOG CENTER RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE RESOURCE BUILDING MATERIALS RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON RJM DESIGN GROUP INC ROSS, TAYLOR JACKSON ROTO ROOTER RUBENS AUTO COLLISION CENTER SAN BERNARDINO CO FIRE DEPT SAN BERNARDINO CTY SANFT, THOMAS SARGENT TOWN PLANNING INC SEXTON, QUINT SHRED PROS SILVER & WRIGHT LLP SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC SMITH, JOHANNA SMITH, MICHAEL SO CALIF GAS COMPANY SOUTH COAST AQMD SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 833.00 0.00 28,977.27 86.09 30,413.26 0.00 2,711.80 33.50 11,270.00 26,934.00 8.40 733.00 37,200.00 1,131.62 8.57 2,614.39 5,933.20 386.95 495.00 687.30 833.00 400.00 1,924.85 351.65 205.80 2,235.85 350.00 513.71 926.23 411.79 18,290.05 192.00 700.00 2,115.88 2,842.00 0.00 242.24 267,957.93 207.50 0.00 1,762.28 7,518.71 833.00 36.73 888.71 0.00 194,340.59 P8 Fire Amount 0.00 523.32 0.00 0.00 1,208.16 261.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,502.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 38.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 812.87 0.00 0.00 11,709.53 0.00 0.00 0.00 35.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 245.27 505.74 0.00 833.00 523.32 28,977.27 86.09 31,621.42 *** 261.23 2,711.80 33.50 11,270.00 26,934.00 8.40 733.00 37,200.00 1,131.62 8.57 5,116.77 *** 5,933.20 386.95 495.00 687.30 833.00 400.00 1,924.85 351.65 244.59 *** 2,235.85 350.00 513.71 926.23 411.79 18,290.05 192.00 1,512.87 *** 2,115.88 2,842.00 11,709.53 242.24 267,957.93 207.50 35.00 1,762.28 7,518.71 833.00 36.73 1,133.98 *** 505.74 194,340.59 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 8 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PO Current Date: 09/27/2017 RTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 07:51:08 Check No. Check Date AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP 00383912 00383913 00383914 00383915 00383916 00383917 00383918 00383919 00383920 00383921 00383922 00383923 00383924 00383925 00383926 00383927 00383932 00383933 00383934 00383935 00383936 00383937 00383938 00383939 00383940 00383941 00383942 00383943 00383944 00383945 00383946 00383947 00383948 00383949 00383950 00383951 00383952 00383953 00383954 00383955 00383958 00383959 00383960 00383961 00383962 00383963 00383964 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/21/2017 09/21/2017 09/21/2017 09/21/2017 09/21/2017 09/21/2017 09/21/2017 09/21/2017 09/21/2017 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 9/12/2017 through 9/26/2017 Vendor Name SOUTHLAND SPORTS OFFICIALS SUN BADGE CO SWANK MOTION PICTURES INC SYCAMORE VILLA MOBILE HOME PARK THEATRICAL LIGHTING & SCENIC SERVICES LLC TORRENCE, STEVEN TWIN BUSCH LP UNITED PACIFIC SERVICES INC UNITED WAY UPBEAT PARADE PRODUCTIONS UPS UPTERGROVE, PATRICK UTILIQUEST VAN DER POL, SARAH VAN SCOYOC ASSOCIATES INC VERIZON VERIZON WIRELESS - LA VERIZON WIRELESS - LA VERIZON WIRELESS - LA VERIZON WIRELESS - LA VERIZON WIRELESS - LA VERIZON WIRELESS - LA VERIZON WIRELESS - LA VICTOR MEDICAL COMPANY VICTOR MEDICAL COMPANY VICTORINO, VALERIE WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY WELLS, JUDITH WEST COAST LIGHTS & SIRENS WEST END MATERIAL SUPPLY WESTLAND GROUP INC WHITE CAP CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY WILSON, PRINCESS WIRZ AND COMPANY XEROX FINANCIAL SERVICES ZALEWSKI, JOHN ZOETIS US LLC ASSI SECURITY AIRGAS USA LLC BRODART BOOKS CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO INC EMCOR SERVICE EMCOR SERVICE HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN INTERSTATE BATTERIES 480.00 458.82 1,348.00 200.00 400.00 0.00 261.96 47,362.00 124.00 12,000.00 28.04 0.00 2,565.07 192.00 4,000.00 27.76 5,671.98 60.12 100.70 182.81 573.15 107.48 5,101.94 6,911.85 4,405.67 25.86 6,889.85 3,939.68 67.41 0.00 297.99 15,750.00 965.56 32.90 533.36 298.38 833.00 135.88 0.00 79.61 3,646.17 450.88 0.00 11,039.00 7,705.05 600.00 535.57 P9 Fire Amount 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,300.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 60.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 404.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 405.00 270.60 0.00 0.00 2,526.00 7,141.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 480.00 458.82 1,348.00 200.00 400.00 2,300.00 261.96 47,362.00 124.00 12,000.00 28.04 60.00 2,565.07 192.00 4,000.00 27.76 5,671.98 60.12 100.70 182.81 573.15 107.48 5,101.94 6,911.85 4,405.67 25.86 6,889.85 3,939.68 67.41 404.42 297.99 15,750.00 965.56 32.90 533.36 298.38 833.00 135.88 405.00 350.21 *** 3,646.17 450.88 2,526.00 18,180.00 *** 7,705.05 600.00 535.57 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 9 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PO Current Date: 09/27/2017 RTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 07:51:08 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Agenda Check Register 9/12/2017 through 9/26/2017 AP 00383965 09/21/2017 LIMS AUTO INC AP 00383968 09/21/2017 OFFICE DEPOT AP 00383969 09/21/2017 ORKIN PEST CONTROL AP 00383970 09/21/2017 SUNRISE FORD AP 00383971 09/21/2017 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION AP 00383972 09/26/2017 CURATALO, JAMES AP 00383973 09/26/2017 KIRKPATRICK, WILLIAM AP 00383974 09/26/2017 LONCAR, PHILIP AP 00383975 09/26/2017 TOWNSEND, JAMES AP 00383976 09/26/2017 WALKER, KENNETH Note: *** Check Number includes both City and Fire District expenditures P10 C Fire Amount 581.85 6,910.42 0.00 962.12 1,979.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total City: Total Fire: Grand Total: 0.00 581.85 185.10 7,095.52 *** 298.00 298.00 0.00 962.12 639.56 2,619.11 * * * 1,733.29 1,733.29 1,629.55 1,629.55 1,019.78 1,019.78 1,733.29 1,733.29 261.76 261.76 $6,613,190.82 $351,938.68 $6,965,129.50 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 10 Current Date: 09/27/2017 Report: CK AGENDA_REG_PORTRAITCONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 07:51:08 P11 DATE: October 4, 2017 TO: RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT STAFF REPORT President and Members of the Board of Directors FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: William Wittkopf, Public Works Services Director Mike Costello, Fire Chief 4)' -.c ----- Ty Quaintance, Facilities Superintendent Ruth Cain, CPPB, Procurement Manager SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO EXTEND THE CONTRACT AGREEMENT WITH MEDLEY FIRE FOR FIRE SUPPRESSION SERVICES FOR ALL FIRE STATIONS (CO 14-239) AND APPROVE THE SPENDING LIMIT OF $8,000 ANNUALLY; NOT TO EXCEED $32,000 OVER A FOUR-YEAR PERIOD RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Fire Board approve Amendment No. 004 to contract CO 14-239 with Medley Fire for fire suppression services for all fire stations in an amount of $8,000 per year, not to exceed $32,000, for the four-year contract period. BACKGROUND: On September 3, 2014, the Public Works Services Department and Fire District initiated a contract service agreement with Medley Fire for testing, repair, and preventive maintenance to water based fire protection systems, clean agent suppression systems, kitchen hood systems, and all fire extinguishers in all fire stations pursuant to RFB #14/15-002. The contract was awarded for a maximum of seven (7) years. Fiscal Year 17/18 is the fourth year of the contract. ANALYSIS: Medley Fire has submitted a letter of intent expressing their desire to continue providing service for the City of Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District during FY 2017/2018. The Fire District is requesting the existing contract be renewed for the next four years, through June 30, 2021 which represents the remaining term of the contract as bid in RFB #14/15-002. Staff recommends the Board of Directors extend the contract with Medley Fire and approve a spending limit of $8,000 annually; not to exceed $32,000 for a maximum of four years. An additional $167,600 for citywide fire suppression services will be considered separately by the City Council. FISCAL IMPACT: Fire suppression service and maintenance is included in the FY 2017/2018 Fire Facilities budget account 3281529-5304. Page 1 of 2 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT STAFF REPORT CONTRACT EXTENSION FOR FIRE SUPPRESSION SERVICES WITH MEDLEY FIRE OCTOBER 4, 2017 COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: None. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1- Contract CO 14-239 for "Fire Suppression Services Attachment 2 - Amendments No. 001-004 to Contract CO 14-239 for "Fire Suppression Services" Page 2of2 P12 P13 C --C) 1 - 2, 3 9 AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 03 day of September, 2014, by and between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation ("City") and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District ("RCFPD") and Medley Fire Protection Inc., a Commercial fire suppression service provider ("Contractor"). RECITALS A. City and RCFPD has heretofore issued its request for proposals to perform the following services: Perform all maintenance, testing, repair and preventative maintenance to water based fire protection systems, clean agent suppression systems, kitchen hood systems and all fire extinguishers through out the City and Fire District Facilties. Per the latest guidelines of California Code of Regulations, title 19 and all (NFPA) codes applicable to the referenced requirements. ("the Project"). B. Contractor has submitted a proposal to perform the services described in Recital "A", above, necessary to complete the Project. C. City and RCFPD desires to engage Contractor to complete the Project in the manner set forth and more fully described herein. D. Contractor represents that it is fully qualified and licensed under the laws of the State of California to perform the services contemplated by this Agreement in a good and professional manner. AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of performance by the parties of the mutual promises, covenants, and conditions herein contained, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Contractor's Services. 1.1 Scope and Level of Services. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement, City and RCFPD hereby engages Contractor to perform all services described in Recitals "A" and "B" above, including, but not limited to performing all maintenance to water based fire protection systems, clean agent suppression systems, kitchen hood systems and all fire extinguishers through out the City and Fire District Facilites. Per the latest guidelines of California Code of Regulations, title 19 and all (NFPA) codes applicable to the referenced requirements, all as more fully set forth in the Contractor's proposal, dated September 3, 2014 and entitled "Scope of Work", attached hereto as Exhibit "A", and incorporated by reference herein. The nature, scope, and level of the services required to be performed by Contractor are set forth in the Scope of Work and are referred to herein as "the Services." In the event of any PSA without professional liability insurance (contractor) Last Revised: 10/02/13 Vendor Initials Page ! Attachment 1 P14 inconsistencies between the Scope of Work and this Agreement, the terms and provisions of this Agreement shall control. 1.2 Revisions to Scope of Work. Upon request of the City and RCFPD, the Contractor will promptly meet with City and RCFPD staff to discuss any revisions to the Project desired by the City and RCFPD. Contractor agrees that the Scope of Work may be amended based upon said meetings, and, by amendment to this Agreement, the parties may agree on a revision or revisions to Contractor's compensation based thereon. A revision pursuant to this Section that does not increase the total cost payable to Contractor by more than ten percent (10%) of the total compensation specified in Section 3, may be approved in writing by City's Manager without amendment. 1.3 Time for Performance. Contractor shall perform all services under this Agreement in a timely, regular basis consistent with industry standards for professional skill and care, and in accordance with any schedule of performance set forth in the Scope of Work, or as set forth in a "Schedule of Performance", if such Schedule is attached hereto as Exhibit "A". 1.4 Standard of Care. As a material inducement to City and RCFPD to enter into this Agreement, Contractor hereby represents that it has the experience necessary to undertake the services to be provided. In light of such status and experience, Contractor hereby covenants that it shall follow the customary professional standards in performing the Services. 1.5 Familiarity with Services. By executing this Agreement, Contractor represents that, to the extent required by the standard of practice, Contractor (a) has investigated and considered the scope of services to be performed, (b) has carefully considered how the services should be performed, and (c) understands the facilities, difficulties and restrictions attending performance of the services under this Agreement. Contractor represents that Contractor, to the extent required by the standard of practice, has investigated any areas of work, as applicable, and is reasonably acquainted with the conditions therein. Should Contractor discover any latent or unknown conditions, which will materially affect the performance of services, Contractor shall immediately inform City and RCFPD of such fact and shall not proceed except at Contractor's risk until written instructions are received from the City and RCFPD Representative. 2. Term of Agreement. The term of this Agreement shall be 7 year(s) and shall become effective as of the date of the mutual execution by way of both parties signature (the "Effective Date"). No work shall be conducted; service or goods will not be provided until this Agreement has been executed and requirements have been fulfilled. Parties to this Agreement shall have the option to renew in one (1) year increments to a total of 7 years, unless sooner terminated as provided in Section 14 herein. Options to renew are contingent upon the City Manager's approval, subject to pricing review, and in Vendor Initials PSA without professional liability insurance (contractor) Page 2 Last Revised: 10/02/13 P15 accordance to all Terms and Conditions stated herein unless otherwise provided in writing by the City and RCFPD. 3. Compensation. 3.1 Compensation. City and RCFPD shall compensate Contractor as set forth in Exhibit A, provided, however, that full, total and complete amount payable to Contractor shall not exceed $49,900 (forty nine thousand nine hundred), including all out of pocket expenses, unless additional compensation is approved by the City Manager or City Council. City and RCFPD shall not withhold any federal, state or other taxes, or other deductions. However, City and RCFPD shall withhold not more than ten percent (10%) of any invoice amount pending receipt of any deliverables reflected in such invoice. Under no circumstance shall Contractor be entitled to compensation for services not yet satisfactorily performed. The parties further agree that compensation may be adjusted in accordance with Section 1.2 to reflect subsequent changes to the Scope of Services. City and RCFPD shall compensate Contractor for any authorized extra services as set forth in Exhibit A. 4. Method of Payment. 4.1 Invoices. Contractor shall submit to City and RCFPD monthly invoices for the Services performed pursuant to this Agreement. The invoices shall describe in detail the Services rendered during the period and shall separately describe any authorized extra services. Any invoice claiming compensation for extra services shall include appropriate documentation of prior authorization of such services. All invoices shall be remitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. 4.2 City and RCFPD shall review such invoices and notify Contractor in writing within ten (10) business days of any disputed amounts. 4.3 City and RCFPD shall pay all undisputed portions of the invoice within thirty (30) calendar days after receipt of the invoice up to the not -to -exceed amounts set forth in Section 3. 4.4 All records, invoices, time cards, cost control sheets and other records maintained by Contractor relating to services hereunder shall be available for review and audit by the City and RCFPD. 5. Representatives. 5.1 City and RCFPD Representative. For the purposes of this Agreement, the contract administrator and City and RCFPD's representative shall be Mike Courtney- Jeff Geith, or such other person as designated in writing by the City and RCFPD ("City and RCFPD Representative"). It shall be Contractor's responsibility to assure that the City and RCFPD Representative is kept informed of the progress of the performance of the services, and Contractor shall refer any decisions that must be made by City and RCFPD to the City and RCFPD Representative. Unless otherwise specified Vendor Initials PSA without professional liability insurance (contractor) Page 3 Last Revised: 10/02/13 P16 herein, any approval of City and RCFPD required hereunder shall mean the approval of the City and RCFPD Representative. 5.2 Contractor Representative. For the purposes of this Agreement, Shelly Beach is hereby designated as the principal and representative of Contractor authorized to act in its behalf with respect to the services specified herein and make all decisions in connection therewith ("Contractor's Representative"). It is expressly understood that the experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of the Contractor's Representative were a substantial inducement for City and RCFPD to enter into this Agreement. Therefore, the Contractor's Representative shall be responsible during the tern of this Agreement for directing all activities of Contractor and devoting sufficient time to personally supervise the services hereunder. Contractor may not change the Responsible Principal without the prior written approval of City and RCFPD. 6. Contractor's Personnel. 6.1 All Services shall Contractor's direct supervision, and all permits, and licenses required by State and without limitation, a City and RCFPD Municipal Code. be performed by Contractor or under personnel shall possess the qualifications, local law to perform such Services, including, business license as required by the City's 6.2 Contractor shall be solely responsible for the satisfactory work performance of all personnel engaged in performing the Services and compliance with the standard of care set forth in Section 1.4. 6.3 Contractor shall be responsible for payment of all employees' and subcontractors' wages and benefits, and shall comply with all requirements pertaining to employer's liability, workers' compensation, unemployment insurance, and Social Security. By its execution of this Agreement, Contractor certifies that it is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code that require every employer to be insured against liability for Worker's Compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and agrees to comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the Services. 6.4 Contractor shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless City and RCFPD and its elected officials, officers and employees, servants, designated volunteers, and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City and RCFPD officials, from any and all liability, damages, claims, costs and expenses of any nature to the extent arising from Contractor's violations of personnel practices and/or any violation of the California Labor Code. City and RCFPD shall have the right to offset against the amount of any fees due to Contractor under this Agreement any amount due to City and RCFPD from Contractor as a result of Contractor's failure to promptly pay to City and RCFPD any reimbursement or indemnification arising under this Section 6. 7. Ownership of Work Product. Vendor Initials PSA without professional liability insurance (contractor) Page 4 Last Revised: 10/02/13 P17 7.1 Ownership. All documents, ideas, concepts, electronic files, drawings, photographs and any and all other writings, including drafts thereof, prepared, created or provided by Contractor in the course of performing the Services, including any and all intellectual and proprietary rights arising from the creation of the same (collectively, "Work Product"), are considered to be "works made for hire" for the benefit of the City and RCFPD. Upon payment being made, and provided Contractor is not in breach of this Agreement, all Work Product shall be and remain the property of City and RCFPD without restriction or limitation upon its use or dissemination by City and RCFPD. Basic survey notes, sketches, charts, computations and similar data prepared or obtained by Contractor under this Agreement shall, upon request, be made available to City and RCFPD. None of the Work Product shall be the subject of any common law or statutory copyright or copyright application by Contractor. In the event of the return of any of the Work Product to Contractor or its representative, Contractor shall be responsible for its safe return to City and RCFPD. Under no circumstances shall Contractor fail to deliver any draft or final designs, plans, drawings, reports or specifications to City and RCFPD upon written demand by City and RCFPD for their delivery, notwithstanding any disputes between Contractor and City and RCFPD concerning payment, performance of the contract, or otherwise. This covenant shall survive the termination of this Agreement. City and RCFPD's reuse of the Work Product for any purpose other than the Project, shall be at City and RCFPD's sole risk. 7.2. Assignment of Intellectual Property Interests: Upon execution of this Agreement and to the extent not otherwise conveyed to City and RCFPD by Section 7.1, above, the Contractor shall be deemed to grant and assign to City and RCFPD, and shall require all of its subcontractors to assign to City and RCFPD, all ownership rights, and all common law and statutory copyrights, trademarks, and other intellectual and proprietary property rights relating to the Work Product and the Project itself, and Contractor shall disclaim and retain no rights whatsoever as to any of the Work Product, to the maximum extent permitted by law. City and RCFPD shall be entitled to utilize the Work Product for any and all purposes, including but not limited to constructing, using, maintaining, altering, adding to, restoring, rebuilding and publicizing the Project or any aspect of the Project. 7.3 Title to Intellectual Property. Contractor warrants and represents that it has secured all necessary licenses, consents or approvals to use any instrumentality, thing or component as to which any intellectual property right exists, including computer software, used in the rendering of the Services and the production of the Work Product and/or materials produced under this Agreement, and that City and RCFPD has full legal title to and the right to reproduce any of the Work Product. Contractor shall defend, indemnify and hold City and RCFPD, and its elected officials, officers, employees, servants, attorneys, designated volunteers, and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City and RCFPD officials, harmless from any loss, claim or liability in any way related to a claim that City and RCFPD's use is violating federal, state or local laws, or any contractual provisions, relating to trade names, licenses, franchises, patents or other means of protecting intellectual property rights and/or interests in products or inventions. Contractor shall bear all costs arising from the use of patented, copyrighted, trade secret or trademarked documents, materials, software, Vendor Initials PSA without professional liability insurance (contractor) Page 5 Last Revised: /0/02/13 P18 in California Government Code §§1090 and 87100) in any decision made by City and RCFPD on any matter in connection with which Contractor has been retained. 10.2 Contractor further represents that it has not employed or retained any person or entity, other than a bona fide employee working exclusively for Contractor, to solicit or obtain this Agreement. Contractor has not paid or agreed to pay any person or entity, other than a bona fide employee working exclusively for Contractor, any fee, commission, gift, percentage, or any other consideration contingent upon the execution of this Agreement. Upon any breach or violation of this warranty, City and RCFPD shall have the right, at its sole and absolute discretion, to terminate this Agreement without further liability, or to deduct from any sums payable to Contractor hereunder the full amount or value of any such fee, commission, percentage or gift. 10.3 Contractor has no knowledge that any officer or employee of City and RCFPD has any interest, whether contractual, noncontractual, financial, proprietary, or otherwise, in this transaction or in the business of Contractor, and that if any such interest comes to the knowledge of Contractor at any time during the term of this Agreement, Contractor shall immediately make a complete, written disclosure of such interest to City and RCFPD, even if such interest would not be deemed a prohibited "conflict of interest" under applicable laws as described in subsection 10.1. 11. Indemnification. 11.1 To the maximum extent permitted by law, the Contractor shall defend, indemnify and hold the City and RCFPD, and its elected officials, officers, employees, servants, volunteers, and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials and RCFPD, (collectively, "Indemnitees"),free and harmless with respect to any and all damages, liabilities, losses, reasonable defense costs or expenses (collectively, "Claims"), including but not limited to Claims relating to death or injury to any person and injury to any property, which arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the acts, omissions, activities or operations of Contractor or any of its officers, employees, subcontractors, Contractors, or agents in the performance of this Agreement. Contractor shall defend Indemnitees in any action or actions filed in connection with any such Claims with counsel of City and RCFPD's choice, and shall pay all costs and expenses, including actual attorney's fees and experts' costs incurred in connection with such defense. The indemnification obligation herein shall not in any way be limited by the insurance obligations contained in this Agreement provided, however, that the Contractor shall have no obligation to indemnify for Claims arising out of the sole negligence or willful misconduct of any of the Indemnitees. 11.2 Nonwaiver of Rights. Indemnitees do not, and shall not, waive any rights that they may possess against Contractor because of the acceptance by City and RCFPD, or the deposit with City and RCFPD, of any insurance policy or certificate required pursuant to this Agreement. 11.3 Waiver of Right of Subrogation. Except as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement, Contractor, on behalf of itself and all parties claiming under Vendor Initials PSA without professional liability insurance (contractor) Page 7 Last Revised: 10/02/13 P19 or through it, hereby waives all rights of subrogation against the Indemnitees, while acting within the scope of their duties, from all claims, losses and liabilities arising out of or incident to activities or operations performed by or on behalf of the Contractor. 11.4 Survival. The provisions of this Section 11 shall survive the termination of the Agreement and are in addition to any other rights or remedies which Indemnitees may have under the law. Payment is not required as a condition precedent to an Indemnitee's right to recover under this indemnity provision, and an entry of judgment against Contractor shall be conclusive in favor of the Indemnitee's right to recover under this indemnity provision. 12. Insurance. 12.1 Liability Insurance. Contractor shall procure and maintain in full force and effect for the duration of this Agreement, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the services hereunder by Contractor, and/or its agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors. 12.2 Minimum Scope of Insurance. Unless otherwise approved by City and RCFPD, coverage shall be at least as broad as: (1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage (occurrence form CG 0001). (2) Insurance Services Office form number CA 0001 (Ed. 1/87) covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto). Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of California, and Employer's Liability Insurance. (3) 12.3 Minimum Limits of Insurance. Contractor shall maintain limits no less than: (1) Commercial General Liability: $2,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this Agreement or the general limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. (2) Automobile Liability: $2,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage. (3) Employer's Liability: $1,000,000 per accident and in the aggregate for bodily injury or disease and Workers' Compensation Insurance in the amount required by law. Vendor Initials PSA without professional liability insurance (contractor) Page 8 Last Revised: 10/02/13 P20 (4) The Insurance obligations under this Agreement shall be the greater of (i) the Insurance coverages and limits carried by the Contractor; or (ii) the minimum Insurance coverages and limits shown in this Agreement. Any insurance proceeds in excess of the specified limits and coverage required which are applicable to a given loss, shall be available to the City and RCFPD. No representation is made that the minimum Insurance requirements of this Agreement are sufficient to cover the obligations of the Contractor under this agreement. 12.4 Deductibles and Self -Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self- insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City and RCFPD and shall not reduce the limits of coverage. City and RCFPD reserves the right to obtain a full certified copy of any required insurance policy and endorsements. 12.5 Other Insurance Provisions. (1) The commercial general liability and automobile liability policies are to contain the following provisions on a separate additionally insured endorsement naming the City , RCFPD, its officers, officials, employees, designated volunteers and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City and RCFPD officials, as additional insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of Contractor; products and completed operations of Contractor; premises owned, occupied or used by Contractor; and/or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by Contractor. The coverage shall contain no limitations on the scope of protection afforded to City, RCFPD, its officers, officials, employees, designated volunteers or agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City and RCFPD officials which are not also limitations applicable to the named insured. (2) For any claims related to this Agreement, Contractor's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects City, RCFPD, its officers, officials, employees, designated volunteers and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City and RCFPD officials. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by City , RCFPD, its officers, officials, employees, designated volunteers or agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City and RCFPD officials shall be in excess of Contractor's insurance and shall not contribute with it. Vendor hiilials PSA without professional liability insurance (contractor) Page 9 Last Revised: 10/02/13 P21 (3) Contractor's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. (4) Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be canceled except after 30 days prior written notice by first class mail has been given to City and RCFPD (ten (10) days prior written notice for non-payment of premium). Contractor shall provide thirty (30) days written notice to City and RCFPD prior to implementation of a reduction of limits or material change of insurance coverage as specified herein. (5) Each insurance policy required by this clause shall expressly waive the insurer's right of subrogation against City and RCFPD, its elected officials, officers, employees, servants, attorneys, designated volunteers, and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City and RCFPD officials. (6) Each policy shall be issued by an insurance company approved in writing by City and RCFPD, which is admitted and licensed to do business in the State of California and which is rated A:VII or better according to the most recent A.M. Best Co. Rating Guide. (7) Each policy shall specify that any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the required policy, including breaches of warranty, shall not affect the coverage required to be provided. (8) (9) Each policy shall specify that any and all costs of adjusting and/or defending any claim against any insured, including court costs and attorneys' fees, shall be paid in addition to and shall not deplete any policy limits. Contractor shall provide any and all other insurance, endorsements, or exclusions as required by the City and RCFPD in any request for proposals applicable to this Agreement. 12.6 Evidence of coverage. Prior to commencing performance under this Agreement, the Contractor shall furnish the City and RCFPD with certificates and original endorsements, or copies of each required policy, effecting and evidencing the insurance coverage required by this Agreement including (1) Additional Insured Endorsement(s), (2) Worker's Compensation waiver of subrogation endorsement, and (3) General liability declarations or endorsement page listing all policy endorsements. The endorsements shall be signed by a person authorized by the insurer(s) to bind coverage on Vendor Initials PSA without professional liability insurance (contractor) Page 10 Last Revised: 10/02/13 its behalf. All endorsements or policies shall be received and approved by the City and RCFPD before Contractor commences performance. If performance of this Agreement shall extend beyond one year, Contractor shall provide City and RCFPD with the required policies or endorsements evidencing renewal of the required policies of insurance prior to the expiration of any required policies of insurance. 12.7 Contractor agrees to include in all contracts with all subcontractors performing work pursuant to this Agreement, the same requirements and provisions of this Agreement including the indemnity and insurance requirements to the extent they apply to the scope of any such subcontractor's work. Contractor shall require its subcontractors to be bound to Contractor and City and RCFPD in the same manner and to the same extent as Contractor is bound to City and RCFPD pursuant to this Agreement, and to require each of its subcontractors to include these same provisions in its contract with any sub -subcontractor. 13. Cooperation. In the event any claim or action is brought against City and RCFPD relating to Contractor's performance or services rendered under this Agreement, Contractor shall render any reasonable assistance and cooperation that City and RCFPD might require. City and RCFPD shall compensate Contractor for any litigation support services in an amount to be agreed upon by the parties. 14. Termination. City and RCFPD shall have the right to terminate this Agreement at any time for any or no reason on not less than ten (10) days prior written notice to Contractor. In the event City and RCFPD exercises its right to terminate this Agreement, City and RCFPD shall pay Contractor for any services satisfactorily rendered prior to the effective date of the termination, provided Contractor is not then in breach of this Agreement. Contractor shall have no other claim against City and RCFPD by reason of such termination, including any claim for compensation. City and RCFPD may terminate for cause following a default remaining uncured more than five (5) business days after service of a notice to cure on the breaching party. Contractor may terminate this Agreement for cause upon giving the City and RCFPD ten (10) business days prior written notice for any of the following: (1) uncured breach by the City and RCFPD of any material term of this Agreement, including but not limited to Payment Terms; (2) material changes in the conditions under which this Agreement was entered into, coupled with the failure of the parties to reach accord on the fees and charges for any Additional Services required because of such changes. 15. Notices. Any notices, bills, invoices, or reports authorized or required by this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed received on (a) the day of delivery if delivered by hand or overnight courier service during Contractor's and City and RCFPD's regular business hours; or (b) on the third business day following deposit in the United States mail, postage prepaid, to the addresses set forth in this Section, or to such other addresses as the parties may, from time to time, designate in writing pursuant to the provisions of this Section. All notices shall be addressed as follows: PSA without professional liability insurance (contractor) Last Revised: 10/02/13 Vendor Initials Page 11 P22 P23 If to City and RCFPD: Michael Courtney, RCFD Facilty Supervisor 9153 9th Street Rancho Cucamonga CA, 91730 If to Contractor: Shelly Beach, Representative 10700 Jersey Blvd #380 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 16. Non -Discrimination and Equal Employment Opportunity. In the performance of this Agreement, Contractor shall not discriminate against any employee, subcontractor, or applicant for employment because of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin, ancestry, age, physical or mental handicap, medical condition, or sexual orientation. Contractor will take affirmative action to ensure that subcontractors and applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment, without regard to their race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin, ancestry, age, physical or mental handicap, medical condition, or sexual orientation. 17. Assignment and Subcontracting. Contractor shall not assign or transfer any interest in this Agreement or subcontract the performance of any of Contractor's obligations hereunder without City and RCFPD's prior written consent. Except as provided herein, any attempt by Contractor to so assign, transfer, or subcontract any rights, duties, or obligations arising hereunder shall be null, void and of no effect. 18. Compliance with Laws. Contractor shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, ordinances, codes and regulations in force at the time Contractor performs the Services. Contractor is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Section 1720, et seq., and 1770, et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000, et seq., ("Prevailing Wage Laws"), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and compliance with other requirements on "public works" and "maintenance" projects. If the Services are being performed as part of an applicable "public works" or "maintenance" project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, and if the total compensation is $1,000 or more, Contractor agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws. The applicable prevailing wage rate determinations can be found at http://www.dir.ca.gov/dlsr/DPreWageDetermination.htm Contractor shall make copies of the prevailing rates of per diem wages for each craft, classification or type of worker needed to execute the Services, available to interested parties upon request, and shall post copies at the Contractor's principal place of business and at the Project site. Contractor shall defend, indemnify and hold the City and RCFPD, its elected officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claim or Vendor Initials PSA without professional liability, insurance (contractor) Page 12 Last Revised: /0/02/13 P24 liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws. 19. Non -Waiver of Terms, Rights and Remedies. Waiver by either party of any one or more of the conditions of performance under this Agreement shall not be a waiver of any other condition of performance under this Agreement. In no event shall the making by City and RCFPD of any payment to Contractor constitute or be construed as a waiver by City and RCFPD of any breach of covenant, or any default which may then exist on the part of Contractor, and the making of any such payment by City and RCFPD shall in no way impair or prejudice any right or remedy available to City and RCFPD with regard to such breach or default. 20. Attorney's Fees. In the event that either party to this Agreement shall commence any legal action or proceeding to enforce or interpret the provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party in such action or proceeding shall be entitled to recover its costs of suit, including reasonable attorney's fees and costs of experts. 21. Exhibits; Precedence. All documents referenced as exhibits in this Agreement are hereby incorporated in this Agreement. In the event of any material discrepancy between the express provisions of this Agreement and the provisions of any document incorporated herein by reference, the provisions of this Agreement shall prevail. 22. Applicable Law and Venue. The validity, interpretation, and performance of this Agreement shall be controlled by and construed under the laws of the State of California. Venue for any action relating to this Agreement shall be in the San Bernardino County Superior Court. 23. Construction. In the event of any asserted ambiguity in, or dispute regarding the interpretation of any matter herein, the interpretation of this Agreement shall not be resolved by any rules of interpretation providing for interpretation against the party who causes the uncertainty to exist or against the party who drafted the Agreement or who drafted that portion of the Agreement. 24. Entire Agreement. This Agreement consists of this document, and any other documents, attachments and/or exhibits referenced herein and attached hereto, each of which is incorporated herein by such reference, and the same represents the entire and integrated agreement between Contractor and City and RCFPD. This Agreement supersedes all prior oral or written negotiations, representations or agreements. This Agreement may not be amended, nor any provision or breach hereof waived, except in a writing signed by the parties which expressly refers to this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties, through their respective authorized representatives, have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above. Contractor Name: Medley Fire Protection Inc. City of ' ho Cuc ong' 1" By ► t • Vendor Initials PSA without professional liabilih, insurance (contractor) Page 13 Last Revised: /0/02//3 P25 Name Title Date\�l,c By: 0,1,:n Name -m nrrl oo Title (two signatures required if corporation) Name Date D Title l 0 - 2_c)—t(( City of Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District By: l �-- Name /.0 21- /IV Date Title EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF SERVICES Exhibit A: Scope of Services incorporated within Agreement Vendor Initials PSA iridtout professional liability insurance (contractor) Page /4 Last Revised: /0/02/13 EXHIBIT B SCHEDULE FOR PERFORMANCE Exhibit B: Schedule for Performance incorporated within Agreement PSA without professionl liability insurance (connector) Last Revised: 10/02/13 Vendor Initials Page /5 P26 PSA without professional liability insurance (contractor) Last Revised: 10/02/13 Vendor Initials Page 16 P27 iGGGiv&&&LavLLG L 1. LJLi1L11JiV T Gil V V1 V1 LJ L4L/1 VSGlLLVll (Sample Only — Not all forms will look identical to this Sample) TRAVELERSJ POLICY NUMBER. WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS LIABILITY POLICY ENDORSEMENT WC 00 03 13 (00)-01 WAIVER OF OUR RIGHT TO RECOVER FROM OTHERS ENDORSEMENT We have the right to recover our payments from anyone liable for an Injury covered by this policy. We will not enforce our right against the person or organization named in the Schedule. (This agreement applies only to the extent that you perform work under a written contract that requires you to obtain this agreement from us.) This agreement shall not operate directly or Indirectly to benefit any one not named In the Schedule. SCHEDULE DESIGNATED PERSON: The City of Rancho Cucamonga, its officers, officials, employees, designated volunteers and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City or officials. DESIGNATED ORGANIZATION: PSA without professional liability insurance (contractor) Last Revised: 10/02/13 Vendor Initials Page 17 P28 P29 tivacniuent is — ampie tiaamonaii tnsurea for un -going rrojects POLICY NUMBER: COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CG 20 10 07 04 THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. ADDITIONAL INSURED — OWNERS, LESSEES OR CONTRACTORS — SCHEDULED PERSON OR ORGANIZATION This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following: COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART SCHEDULE Name Of Additional Insured Person(s) Or Organization(s): Location(s) Of Covered Operations The City of Rancho Cucamonga, its officers, officials, employees, designated volunteers and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City or officials. Information required to complete this Schedule, if not shown above, will be shown in the Declarations. A. Section II — Who Is An Insured Is amended to include as an additional insured the person(s) or organization(s) shown in the Schedule, but only with respect to liability for "bodily Injury", "property damage" or "personal and advertising injury" caused, in whole or in part, by: 1. Your acts or omissions; or 2. The acts or omissions of those acting on your behalf; In the performance of your ongoing operations for the additional insured(s) at the location(s) desig- nated above. CG 20 10 07 04 B. With respect to the Insurance afforded to these additional insureds, the following additional exclu- sions apply: This insurance does not apply to "bodily injury" or "property damage" occurring after: 1. All work, Including materials, parts or equip- ment furnished in connection with such work, on the project (other than service, maintenance or repairs) to be performed by or on behalf of the additional insured(s) at the location of the covered operations has been completed; or 2. That portion of "your work" out of which the injury or damage arises has been put to its in- tended use by any person or organization other than another contractor or subcontractor en- gaged in performing operations for a principal as a part of the same project. C ISO Properties, Inc., 2004 Page 1 of 1 �a Vendor Initials PSA without professional liability insurance (contractor) Page 18 Last Revised: 10/02/13 MEDLE-2 P30 OP ID: VCOS `'moi/Y CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE DATE(MMIDDYYY) 09/29/2014 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). . PRODUCER Orr and Associates Ins. Serv. CA License #0E63493 28780 Single Oak Drive #255 Temecula, CA 92590 CONTACT NAME: PHONE 951-506-5859 FAX 951-506-9299 INC. Ext): {AIC, No): 11Lo. ADDRESS: INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC # INSURER A : LANDMARK AMERICAN INS. CO. A- k 33138 INSURED Medley Fire Protection, Inced' PO Box 8334 r� Alta Loma, CA 91701 v P`n VCm A nc-------._._-__ _-- -- -- `�11�I INSURERB:INTEGON NATIONAL INS CO i4'-- INSURERC:GREATAMERICAN INS CO A- \-- 16691 INSURERD:WESCO INSURANCE CO t. INSURER E : j INSURER F : ----..._...—.- RCVIJIutV DI Unil t3 tK: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. INSR LTR TYPE OF INSURANCE ADDL INSD SUBR WVD POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFF IMMIDDIYYYY) POLICY EXP IMMIDD/YYYY) LIMITS A X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY S 1,000,000 EACH OCCURRENCE CLAIMS -MADE X OCCUR X X LHA137560 04/25/2014 04/25/2015 PREM $ 50,000 SES (Ea occurrience) MED EXP 5 0 (Any one person) PERSONAL B 5 1,000,000 ADV INJURY GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES X PER: GENERAL AGGREGATE $ 2,000,000 POLICY I I' Tei LOC PRODUCTS - COMP/OPAGG 5 2,000,000 OTHER: $ B AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT (Ea accident) $ 1,000,000 ANY AUTO ALL OWNED X SCHEDULED X X 12001416 05/16/2014 05/16/2015 BODILY INJURY (Per person) 5 AUTOS AUTOS BODILY INJURY (Per accident) $ HIRED AUTOS AUT SEED PROPERTY DAMAGE (Per accident) $ $ X UMBRELLA LIAB X OCCUR EACH OCCURRENCE $ 2,000,000 C EXCESS LIAR CLAIMS -MADE XS3304897-FOLLOWS GUM UTO 04/25/2014 04/25/2015 AGGREGATE 5 2,000,000 DED RETENTION 5 5 WORKERS COMPENSATION_ AND AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY YIN X SPTATUTE OTH- ANYPROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? N / A X WWC3087910 04/01/2014 04/01/2015 E.LEACHACCIDENT 5 1,000,000 (Mandatory In NH) If yes, describe under E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE S 1,000,000 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT S 1,000,000 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS 1 VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached If mo a space is required) City of Rancho Cucamonga, Rancho Cucamonga Fire District, its elected officials, officers, employees, servants, attorneys, designated volunteers, and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials are named as additional insured. Excess follows General Liability and Auto. inn1-1TIrIP.11T, I I," e" --r, CANCELLATION CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, A 91730 SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE aeliaApirruz ACORD 25 (2014/01) © 1988-2014 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD POLICY NUMBER: LHA137560 COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CG 20 10 0413 THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. ADDITIONAL INSURED - OWNERS, LESSEES OR CONTRACTORS - SCHEDULED PERSON OR ORGANIZATION This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following: COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART SCHEDULE Name Of Additional Insured Person(s) Or Organization(s) Location(s) Of Covered Operations City of Rancho Cucamonga, Rancho Cucamonga Fire District, its elected officials, officers, employees, servants, attorneys, designated volunteers, and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials Information required to complete this Schedule, if not shown above, will be shown in the Declarations. A. Section II — Who Is An Insured is amended to include as an additional insured the person(s) or organization(s) shown in the Schedule, but only with respect to liability for "bodily injury", "property damage" or "personal and advertising injury" caused, in whole or in part, by: 1. Your acts or omissions; or 2. The acts or omissions of those acting on your behalf; in the performance of your ongoing operations for the additional insured(s) at the location(s) designated above. However: 1. The insurance afforded to such additional insured only applies to the extent permitted by law; and 2. If coverage provided to the additional insured is required by a contract or agreement, the insurance afforded to such additional insured will not be broader than that which you are required by the contract or agreement to provide for such additional insured. CG 20 10 0413 B. With respect to the insurance afforded to these additional insureds, the following additional exclusions apply: This insurance does not apply to "bodily injury" or "property damage" occurring after: 1. All work, including materials, parts or equipment furnished in connection with such work, on the project (other than service, maintenance or repairs) to be performed by or on behalf of the additional insured(s) at the location of the covered operations has been completed; or 2. That portion of "your work" out of which the injury or damage arises has been put to its intended use by any person or organization other than another contractor or subcontractor engaged in performing operations for a principal as a part of the same project. © Insurance Services Office, Inc., 2012 Page 1 of 2 P31 C. With respect to the insurance afforded to these additional insureds, the following is added to Section III — Limits Of Insurance: If coverage provided to the additional insured is required by a contract or agreement, the most we will pay on behalf of the additional insured is the amount of insurance: 1. Required by the contract or agreement; or Page 2 of 2 2. Available under the applicable Limits of Insurance shown in the Declarations; whichever is less. This endorsement shall not increase the applicable Limits of Insurance shown in the Declarations. © Insurance Services Office, Inc., 2012 CG 20 10 0413 P32 P33 LANDMARK AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY This Endorsement Changes The Policy. Please Read It Carefully. WAIVER OF TRANSFER OF RIGHTS OF RECOVERY AGAINST OTHERS TO US This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following: COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE FORM PRODUCTS/COMPLETED OPERATIONS LIABILITY COVERAGE FORM SCHEDULE Name of Person or Organization: City of Rancho Cucamonga, Rancho Cucamonga Fire District, its elected officials, officers, employees, servants, attorneys, designated volunteers, and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials. The following is added to SECTION IV — CONDITIONS, 8. TRANSFER OF RIGHTS OF RECOVERY AGAINST OTHERS TO US: We waive any right of recovery we may have against the person or organization shown in the SCHEDULE above because of payment we make for injury or damage arising out of your ongoing operations, "your product" or "your work" done under a written contract with that person or organization and included in the "product -completed operations hazard". This waiver applies only to the person or organization shown in the SCHEDULE above. This endorsement effective 09/24/2014 forms part of Policy Number LHA137560 issued to MEDLEY FIRE PROTECTION, INC. by Landmark American Insurance Company RSG 14048 1008 Includes copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office, Inc. 1992 with its permission. r P34 POLICY NUMBER: 12001416 COMMERCIAL AUTO CA 20 48 02 99 THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. DESIGNATED INSURED This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following: BUSINESS AUTO COVERAGE FORM GARAGE COVERAGE FORM MOTOR CARRIER COVERAGE FORM TRUCKERS COVERAGE FORM With respect to coverage provided by this endorsement, the provisions of the Coverage Form apply unless modified by this endorsement. This endorsement identifies person(s) or organization(s) who are "insureds" under the Who Is An Insured Provision of the Coverage Form. This endorsement does not alter coverage provided in the Coverage Form. This endorsement changes the policy effective on the inception date of the policy unless another date is indicated below. Endorsement Effective: 09/29/2014 Countersigned By: d.... . . VNamed (Authorized Representative) Insured: Medley Fire Protection, Inc. SCHEDULE Name of Person(s) or Organization(s): City of Rancho Cucamonga, Rancho Cucamonga Fire District, its officials, officers, employees, servants, attorneys, designated volunteers, and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of city officials 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 All projects for this additional insured during this policy term (If no entry appears above, information required to complete this endorsement will be shown in the Declarations as applicable to the endorsement.) Each person or organization shown in the Schedule is an "insured" for Liability Coverage, but only to the extent that person or organization qualifies as an "insured" under the Who Is An Insured Provision contained in Section II of the Coverage Form. CA 20 48 02 99 Copyright, Insurance Services Office, Inc., 1998 Page 1 of 1 POLICY NUMBER: COMMERCIAL AUTO 12001416 CA 04 44 03 10 THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. WAIVER OF TRANSFER OF RIGHTS OF RECOVERY AGAINST OTHERS TO US (WAIVER OF SUBROGATION) This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following: BUSINESS AUTO COVERAGE FORM BUSINESS AUTO PHYSICAL DAMAGE COVERAGE FORM GARAGE COVERAGE FORM MOTOR CARRIER COVERAGE FORM TRUCKERS COVERAGE FORM With respect to coverage provided by this endorsement, the provisions of the Coverage Form apply unless modi- fied by the endorsement. This endorsement changes the policy effective on the inception date of the policy unless another date is indicated below. Named Insured: Medley Fire Protection, Inc. Endorsement Effective Date: 09/29/2014 SCHEDULE Name(s) Of Person(s) Or Organization(s) City of Rancho Cucamonga, Rancho Cucamonga Fire District, its officials, officers, employees, servants, attorneys, designated volunteers, and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of city officials Information required to complete this Schedule, if not shown above, will be shown in the Declarations. The Transfer Of Rights Of Recovery Against Others To Us Condition does not apply to the person(s) or organization(s) shown in the Schedule, but only to the extent that subrogation is waived prior to the "accident" or the "loss" under a contract with that person or organization. CA 04 44 03 10 © Insurance Services Office, Inc., 2009 Page 1 of 1 P35 P36 WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS LIABILITY INSURANCE POLICY WC 04 03 06 (Ed. 4-84) WAIVER OF OUR RIGHT TO RECOVER FROM OTHERS ENDORSEMENT—CALIFORNIA We have the right to recover our payments from anyone liable for an injury covered by this policy. We will not enforce our right against the person or organization named in the Schedule. (This agreement applies only to the extent that you perform work under a written contract that requires you to obtain this agreement from us.) You must maintain payroll records accurately segregating the remuneration of your employees while engaged in the work described in the Schedule. The additional premium for this endorsement shall be 0% of the California workers' compensation premium otherwise due on such remuneration. Schedule Person or Organization Job Description City of Rancho Cucamonga All CA Operations Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 This endorsement changes the policy to which it is attached and is effective on the date issued unless otherwise stated. Endorsement Effective 4/1/2014 Policy No. WWC3087910 Endorsement No. WC040306 Insured Medley Fire Protection, Inc. (Corporation) Premium $ 4031 Insurance Company Wesco Insurance Company Countersigned by AMENDMENT NO. 001 to Professional Services Agreement (CO #14-239) between Medley Fire Protection Inc. (hereinafter "Contractor") and City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter the "City") This Amendment No. 001 will serve w amend the Professional Services Agreement (hereinafter "Agreement"), CO# 14-239, to incorporate the following: The above mentioned PSA has been in effect for one (1) years and has an option to renew in one (1) year increments to a total of seven (7) years. Contractor and City would like to exercise the option to renew CO#14-239 for one (1) additional year (FY 15-16) extending the Agreement date to June 30, 2016. Said extension will be in accordance with the Contractor's Letter of Intent attached hereto. This will be the second year of the Agreement. All other Terms and Conditions of the original Agreement CO#14-239, will remain in full effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties, through their respective authorized representatives, have executed this Amendment by way of signature by both parties and on the date indicated below. Please return two (2) original signed copies to the City no later than March 30, 2015. The City will process both copies for signature and provide Medley Fire Protection Inc. with one (1) fully executed copy of the Amendment. Medley Fire Protection Inc. By: Name Date 13y: Nam City of R `cho Cucamor ga By: -8--r5 I Name Date Title By: Date Name Date Title (two signatures required if corporation) Last Revised: 09/28/2012 Title P37 Page 1 of! Attachment 2 P38 9kledtey Fire Protection Inc. Fire Alarm /Fire Sprinkler/Fire Extinguisher/ Emergency Lighting /Restaurant / Industrial & Clean Agent Fire Suppression Systems Letter of Intent Renew. March 11, 2015 City Of Rancho Cucamonga Purchasing Department 10500 Civic Center Dr Rancho Cucamonga CA 91730 Attn: Inge Tunggaldjaja, At this time Medley Fire Protection would like to renew for the 2015/16 year for our Fire Alarm and Water Based Fire, Protection System Maintenance, Testing, Repair and Preventative Maintenance Services per specification and RFP terms and conditions. No price increase for the contract period July 1, 2015- June 30, 2016. Thank you, Si -W4j eutc,k, Shelly Beach President Medley Fire Protection, Inc. P. 0. Box 8334 Alta Loma, CA 91701 * License 11706851 C-16 (877) 463-3539 / (909) 581-0915 / FAX (909) 354-3168 P39 AMENDMENT NO. 002 to Professional Services Agreement (CO 414-239) between Medley Fire Protection Inc. (hereinafter "Contractor") and City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter the "City") This Amendment No. 002 will serve to amend the Professional Services Agreement (hereinafter "Agreement"), CO# 14-239, to incorporate the following: The above mentioned PSA has been in effect for two (2) years and has an option to renew in one (I) year increments to a total of seven (7) years. Contractor and City would like to exercise the option to renew CO#14-239 for one (1) additional year (FY 16-17) extending the Agreement date to June 30, 2017. Said extension will be in accordance with the Contractor's Letter of Intent attached hereto. This will be the third year of the Agreement. All other Terms and Conditions of the original Agreement CO#14-239, will remain in full effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties, through their respective authorized representatives, have executed this Amendment by way of signature by both parties and on the date indicated below. Please return two (2) original signed copies to the City no later than May 17, 2016. The City will process both copies for signature and provide Medley Fire Protection Inc. with one (1) fully executed copy of the Amendment. Medley Fire Protection Inc. B Name Title City of ncho Cucamonga \-1) By: L /. 5 Date Name ? Date Title Byc',-, d...(sRs, (5\ � l D By: Name Date Name Date Title (two signatures required if corporation) Title Last Revised: 09/28/2012 Page 1 of 1 P40 Medley Fire Protection Inc. Fire Alarm /Fire Sprinkler/ Fire Extinguisher/ Emergency Lighting /Restaurant/ Industrial & Clean Agent Fire Suppression Systems Letter of Intent Renew. May 3, 2016 City Of Rancho Cucamonga Purchasing Department 10500 Civic Center Dr Rancho Cucamonga CA 91730 Attn: Inge Tunggaldjaja, At this time Medley Fire Protection would like to renew for the 2016/17 year for our Fire Alarm and Water Based Fire, Protection System Maintenance, Testing, Repair and Preventative Maintenance Services per specification and RFP terms and conditions. No price increase for the contract period July 1, 2016- June 30, 2017. Thank you, Skel.(j 6eac44. Shelly Beach President Medley Fire Protection, Inc. P. 0. Box 8334 Alta Loma, CA 91701 * License #706851 C-16 (877) 463-3539 / (909) 581-0915 / FAX (909) 354-3268 P41 AMENDMENT NO. 003 to Professional Services Agreement (CO #14-239) between Medley Fire Protection Inc. (hereinafter "Contractor") and City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter the "City") This Amendment No. 003 will serve to amend the Professional Services Agreement (hereinafter "Agreement"), CO# 14-239, to incorporate the following: The above mentioned PSA has been in effect for three (3) years and has an option to renew in one (1) year increments to a total of seven (7) years. Contractor and City would like to exercise the option to renew CO#14-239 for one (1) additional year (FY 17-18) extending the Agreement date to June 30, 2018. Said extension will be in accordance with the Contractor's Letter of Intent attached hereto. This will be the forth year of the Agreement. All other Terms and Conditions of the original Agreement CO#14-239, will remain in full effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties, through their respective authorized representatives, have executed this Amendment by way of signature by both parties and on the date indicated below. Please return two (2) original signed copies to the City no later than June 22, 2017. The City will process both copies for signature and provide Medley Fire Protection Inc. with one (1) fully executed copy of the Amendment. Medley Fire Protection Inc. BY: Name !.,+ �r Date Title By: ///_e• 4 - /7-17 Name / Date Title (two signatures required if corporation) City of ' : cho Cucampnga By: Name 7/(2/% Date Title By: '1/1 Name Title F e1Eg 7-rr^/1 Date Last Revised: 09/28/2012 Page 1 of 1 P42 ,Medley Fire Protection Inc. Fire Alarm / Fire Sprinkler / Fire Extinguisher/ Emergency Lighting / Restaurant / Industrial & Clean Agent Fire Suppression Systems Letter of Intent Renew. June 13, 2017 City Of Rancho Cucamonga Purchasing Department 10500 Civic Center Dr Rancho Cucamonga CA 91730 Attn: Inge Tunggaldjaja, At this time Medley Fire Protection would like to renew for the 2017/18 year for our Fire Alarm and Water Based Fire, Protection System Maintenance, Testing, Repair and Preventative Maintenance Services per specification and RFP terms and conditions. No price increase for the contract period July 1, 2017- June 30, 2018. Thank you, Ske,U.y bear in. Shelly Beach President Medley Fire Protection, Inc. P. 0. Box 8334 Alta Loma, CA 91701 * License #706851 C-16 (877) 463-3539 / (909) 581-0915 / FAX (909) 354-3268 P43 AMENDMENT NO. 004 to Professional Services Agreement (CO #14-239) between Medley Fire Protection Inc. (hereinafter "Contractor") and City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter the "City") This Amendment No. 004 will serve to amend the Professional Services Agreement (hereinafter "Agreement"), CO# 14-239, to incorporate the following: The above mentioned PSA has been in effect for three (3) years and has an option to renew in one (1) year increments to a total of seven (7) years. Separate compensation amount in the Contract Agreement between the City and Fire District to: $41,900 for the City and $8,000 for the Fire district for a total of $49,900. Contractor and City would like to exercise the option to renew CO#14-239 for one (1) additional year (FY 17-18) extending the Agreement date to June 30, 2018. This will be the forth year of the Agreement. All other Terms and Conditions of the original Agreement CO#14-239, will remain in full effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties, through their respective authorized representatives, have executed this Amendment by way of signature by both parties and on the date indicated below. Please return two (2) original signed copies to the City no later than September 28, 2017. The City will process both copies for signature and provide Medley Fire Protection Inc. with one (1) fully executed copy of the Amendment. Medley Fire Protection Inc. City of Rancho Cucamonga By: By: Name Date Name Date Title Title By: Name Date Name Date Title Title (two signatures required if corporation) By: Last Revised: 09/28/2012 Page 1 of 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Agenda Check Register 9/12/2017 through 9/26/2017 P44 City Fire Amount AP 00007333 09/13/2017 BUREAU OF RECLAMATION 873.07 0.00 873.07 AP 00007334 09/13/2017 CALIF GOVERNMENT VEBA/RANCHO CUCAMONGA 11,370.00 0.00 11.370.00 AP 00007335 09/13/2017 EXELON GENERATION CO. LLC. 201,482.20 0.00 201.482.20 AP 00007336 09/13/2017 POWEREX CORP 6,485.60 0.00 6.485.60 AP 00007337 09/13/2017 RCCEA 1,850.50 0.00 1.850.50 AP 00007338 09/13/2017 RCPFA 11,400.32 0.00 11,400.32 AP 00007339 09/20/2017 RE ASTORIA 2 LLC 41,933.55 0.00 41.933.55 AP 00007340 09/20/2017 RIVERSIDE, CITY OF 6,484.00 0.00 6,484.00 AP 00007341 09/20/2017 SAN BERNARDINO CTY SHERIFFS DEPT 2,927,876.00 0.00 2,927,876.00 AP 00007342 09/26/2017 AHUMADA, ALEXANDER R 0.00 651.52 651.52 AP 00007343 09/26/2017 ALMAND, LLOYD 0.00 651.52 651.52 AP 00007344 09/26/2017 BANTAU, VICTORIA 0.00 651.52 651.52 AP 00007345 09/26/2017 BAZAL, SUSAN 0.00 240.93 240.93 AP 00007346 09/26/2017 BELL, MICHAEL L. 0.00 1,303.76 1,303.76 AP 00007347 09/26/2017 BERRY, DAVID 0.00 1,019.78 1.019.78 AP 00007348 09/26/2017 BROCK, ROBIN 0.00 977.64 977.64 AP 00007349 09/26/2017 CAMPBELL, GERALD 0.00 746.37 746.37 AP 00007350 09/26/2017 CAMPBELL, STEVEN 0.00 1,407.17 1,407.17 AP 00007351 09/26/2017 CARNES, KENNETH 0.00 472.96 472.96 AP 00007352 09/26/2017 CLABBY, RICHARD 0.00 1,019.78 1,019.78 AP 00007353 09/26/2017 CLOUGHESY, DONALD R 0.00 1,733.29 1,733.29 AP 00007354 09/26/2017 CORCORAN, ROBERT 0.00 587.88 587.88 AP 00007355 09/26/2017 COX, KARL 0.00 651.52 651.52 AP 00007356 09/26/2017 CRANE, RALPH 0.00 1,020.45 1,020.45 AP 00007357 09/26/2017 CROSSLAND, WILBUR 0.00 472.96 472.96 AP 00007358 09/26/2017 DAGUE, JAMES 0.00 1,303.76 1,303.76 AP 00007359 09/26/2017 DE ANTONIO, SUSAN 0.00 587.88 587.88 AP 00007360 09/26/2017 DEANS, JACKIE 0.00 630.69 630.69 AP 00007361 09/26/2017 DOMINICK, SAMUEL A. 0.00 977.64 977.64 AP 00007362 09/26/2017 EAGLESON, MICHAEL 0.00 1,303.76 1.303.76 AP 00007363 09/26/2017 EGGERS, BOB 0.00 1,733.29 1,733.29 AP 00007364 09/26/2017 FRITCHEY, JOHN D. 0.00 472.96 472.96 AP 00007365 09/26/2017 HEYDE, DONALD 0.00 1,303.76 1,303.76 AP 00007366 09/26/2017 INTERLICCHIA, ROSALYN _ 0.00 261.76 261.76 AP 00007367 09/26/2017 KILMER, STEPHEN 0.00 1,364.11 1,364.11 AP 00007368 09/26/2017 LANE, WILLIAM 0.00 1,303.76 1,303.76 AP 00007369 09/26/2017 LEE, ALLAN J. 0.00 1.300.86 1,300.86 AP 00007370 09/26/2017 LENZE, PAUL E 0.00 1.223.96 1.223.96 AP 00007371 09/26/2017 LONGO, JOE 0.00 172.48 172.48 AP 00007372 09/26/2017 LUTTRULL, DARRELL 0.00 472.96 472.96 AP 00007373 09/26/2017 MACKALL, BEVERLY 0.00 445.89 445.89 AP 00007374 09/26/2017 MAYFIELD, RON 0.00 1,389.38 1,389.38 AP 00007375 09/26/2017 MCKEE, JOHN 0.00 651.52 651.52 AP 00007376 09/26/2017 MCNEIL, KENNETH 0.00 651.52 651.52 AP 00007377 09/26/2017 MICHAEL, L. DENNIS 0.00 977.64 977.64 AP 00007378 09/26/2017 MORGAN, BYRON 0.00 2,317.74 2,317.74 AP 00007379 09/26/2017 MYSKOW, DENNIS 0.00 1.019.78 1,019.78 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 1 Current Date: 09/27/2017 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 07:51:08 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Agenda Check Register 9/12/2017 through 9/26/2017 P45 Fire Amount AP 00007380 09/26/2017 NAUMAN, MICHAEL 0.00 472.96 472.96 AP 00007381 09/26/2017 NEE, RON 0.00 630.69 630.69 AP 00007382 09/26/2017 NELSON, MARY JANE 0.00 172.48 172.48 AP 00007383 09/26/2017 O'BRIEN, TOM 0.00 1,733.29 1,733.29 AP 00007384 09/26/2017 PLOUNG, MICHAEL J 0.00 579.26 579.26 AP 00007385 09/26/2017 POST, MICHAEL R 0.00 1,628.59 1,628.59 AP 00007386 09/26/2017 PROULX, PATRICK 0.00 1,733.29 1,733.29 AP 00007387 09/26/2017 ROEDER, JEFF 0.00 1,303.76 1,303.76 AP 00007388 09/26/2017 SALISBURY, THOMAS 0.00 651.52 651.52 AP 00007389 09/26/2017 SMITH, RONALD 0.00 472.96 472.96 AP 00007390 09/26/2017 SPAGNOLO, SAM 0.00 472.96 472.96 AP 00007391 09/26/2017 SPAIN, WILLIAM 0.00 746.37 746.37 AP 00007392 09/26/2017 SULLIVAN, JAMES 0.00 472.96 472.96 AP 00007393 09/26/2017 TAYLOR, STEVE 0.00 1,629.55 1.629.55 AP 00007394 09/26/2017 TULEY, TERRY 0.00 1,303.76 1.303.76 AP 00007395 09/26/2017 VANDERKALLEN, FRANCIS 0.00 1,064.00 1.064.00 AP 00007396 09/26/2017 VARNEY, ANTHONY 0.00 977.64 977.64 AP 00007397 09/26/2017 WALTON, KEVIN 0.00 1,364.11 1,364.11 AP 00007398 09/26/2017 YOWELL, TIMOTHY A 0.00 1,389.38 1,389.38 AP 00383581 09/13/2017 10-8 RETROFIT INC. 586.09 0.00 586.09 AP 00383582 09/13/2017 10-8 RETROFIT INC. 581.55 0.00 581.55 AP 00383583 09/13/2017 A & A AUTOMOTIVE AND TIRE INC. 2,333.24 0.00 2,333.24 AP 00383584 09/13/2017 ACTION AWARDS INC. 882.47 0.00 882.47 AP 00383585 09/13/2017 AFLAC GROUP INSURANCE 40.97 0.00 40.97 AP 00383586 09/13/2017 ALBERTSON, MICHAEL 0.00 20.41 20.41 AP 00383587 09/13/2017 ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT 403,716.45 0.00 403,716.45 AP 00383588 09/13/2017 ALPHAGRAPHICS 376.55 0.00 376.55 AP 00383589 09/13/2017 ASSI SECURITY 1,305.00 0.00 1,305.00 AP 00383590 09/13/2017 BARNES AND NOBLE 124.02 0.00 124.02 AP 00383591 09/13/2017 BAUER COMPRESSORS 0.00 3,929.87 3,929.87 AP 00383592 09/13/2017 BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS TRAINING INSTITUTE 481.00 0.00 481.00 AP 00383593 09/13/2017 BOOT BARN INC. 5,161.53 0.00 5,161.53 AP 00383594 09/13/2017 BUQUET, CHARLES 256.00 0.00 256.00 AP 00383595 09/13/2017 C V W D 150.91 0.00 150.91 AP 00383596 09/13/2017 C V W D 537.28 0.00 537.28 AP 00383597 09/13/2017 C V W D 0.00 292.20 292.20 AP 00383600 09/13/2017 C V W D 91,684.51 1,582.56 93,267.07 *** AP 00383601 09/13/2017 CAL FIRE/STATE MARSHAL 0.00 150.00 150.00 AP 00383602 09/13/2017 CAL OSHA REPORTER 395.00 0.00 395.00 AP 00383603 09/13/2017 CAL PERS LONG TERM CARE 286.21 0.00 286.21 AP 00383604 09/13/2017 CALIFORNIA BANK & TRUST 17,886.95 0.00 17,886.95 AP 00383605 09/13/2017 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 8.44 0.00 8.44 AP 00383606 09/13/2017 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 60.00 0.00 60.00 AP 00383607 09/13/2017 CAPITAL ONE COMMERCIAL 734.82 0.00 734.82 AP 00383608 09/13/2017 CAPITAL ONE COMMERCIAL 0.00 597.04 597.04 AP 00383609 09/13/2017 CCPOA REGISTRATION COMMITTEE 675.00 0.00 675.00 AP 00383610 09/13/2017 CCS ORANGE COUNTY JANITORIAL INC. 55.848.52 0.00 55,848.52 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 2 Current Date: 09/27/2017 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAITCONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 07:51:08 Check No. Check Date AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP 00383611 00383612 00383613 00383614 00383615 00383616 00383617 00383618 00383619 00383620 00383621 00383622 00383623 00383624 00383625 00383626 00383627 00383628 00383629 00383630 00383631 00383632 00383633 00383634 00383636 00383637 00383638 00383639 00383640 00383641 00383642 00383643 00383644 00383645 00383646 00383647 00383648 00383649 00383650 00383651 00383652 00383653 00383654 00383655 00383656 00383657 00383658 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 9/12/2017 through 9/26/2017 Vendor Name CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS CINTAS CORPORATION 4150 CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION COMMERCIAL TRANSPORTATION SERVICES INC. COMMUNITY BANK CONVERGEONE INC. CROWN CASTLE USA INC D & D SERVICES INC. DELTA DENTAL DELTA DENTAL DEPENDABLE COFFEE INC. DUMBELL MAN FITNESS EQUIPMENT, THE EARPHONE GUY LLC, THE ECONOLITE CONTROL PRODUCTS INC ERICKSON HALL CONSTRUCTION ESTEVENE, AMADOR EXECUTIVE AUTO DETAIL EXPERIAN FASTAIRE HAND DRYERS INC. FAUST MEDIA SERVICES FONTANA RADIATOR SERVICE FORTIN LAW GROUP FRANKLIN TRUCK PARTS FRONTIER COMM FRONTIER COMM FRONTIER COMM FRONTIER COMM FRONTIER COMM G AND M BUSINESS INTERIORS GATEWAY PET CEMETERY AND CREMATORY GEOGRAPHICS GEORGE HILLS COMPANY GLOBAL PRESENTER GOODYEAR TIRE AND RUBBER CO. GRAINGER GRAYDON, RONALD GTFO GAMES LLC HILLS PET NUTRITION SALES INC HILTI INC HOSE MAN INC IECIAA INLAND VALLEY EMERGENCY PET CLINIC INTELESYS ONE INC INTERWEST CONSULTING GROUP INC JRC HOUSING JRC HOUSING P46 C Fire Amount 0.00 5,637.52 2,200.28 75.00 8,509.70 21,248.23 43,325.88 1,000.00 430.00 1,605.98 41,336.68 51.00 607.86 464.94 57,723.19 0.00 500.00 1,775.00 52.00 149.23 1,823.13 0.00 12,663.97 0.00 3,639.50 728.38 398.41 744.11 2,834.53 8,349.99 725.00 774.50 1,568.38 0.00 4,995.70 1,184.65 91.30 295.00 473.37 1,036.77 41.79 395.00 297.00 3,789.25 1,330.00 7,290.00 3,595.00 1,069.80 1,069.80 0.00 5,637.52 294.33 2.494.61 *** 0.00 75.00 0.00 8,509.70 0.00 21,248.23 10,831.47 54,157.35 *** 0.00 1,000.00 0.00 430.00 0.00 1,605.98 0.00 41,336.68 0.00 51.00 0.00 607.86 0.00 464.94 0.00 57.723.19 121,161.41 121.161.41 0.00 500.00 0.00 1,775.00 0.00 52.00 0.00 149.23 0.00 1.823.13 2,985.39 2,985.39 0.00 12.663.97 300.32 300.32 1,800.36 5,439.86 *** 0.00 728.38 0.00 398.41 0.00 744.11 0.00 2,834.53 4,221.35 12,571.34 *** 0.00 725.00 0.00 774.50 0.00 1,568.38 775.05 775.05 0.00 4,995.70 0.00 1,184.65 0.00 91.30 0.00 295.00 0.00 473.37 0.00 1,036.77 0.00 41.79 0.00 395.00 0.00 297.00 0.00 3,789.25 0.00 1,330.00 0.00 7,290.00 0.00 3,595.00 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 3 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PO Current Date: 09/27/2017 RTRAIT CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait 1 Time: 07:51:08 Check No. Check Date AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP 00383659 00383660 00383661 00383662 00383663 00383664 00383665 00383666 00383667 00383670 00383671 00383672 00383673 00383674 00383675 00383676 00383677 00383678 00383679 00383680 00383681 00383682 00383683 00383684 00383685 00383686 00383687 00383688 00383689 00383690 00383691 00383692 00383693 00383694 00383695 00383696 00383697 00383698 00383699 00383700 00383701 00383702 00383703 00383704 00383705 00383706 00383707 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 9/12/2017 through 9/26/2017 Vendor Name KENT HARRIS TRUCKING & MATERIALS KIMBALL MIDWEST KIWANIS CLUB OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDCARE USA LLC LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC. LEVERAGE INFORMATION SYSTEMS INC LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE LIFE ASSIST INC LOUIE'S NURSERY LOWES COMPANIES INC. LVD RANCHO CUCAMONGA LLC MARIPOSA LANDSCAPES INC MARLINK SA INC MCFADDEN DALE HARDWARE MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY MD7 MIDWEST TAPE MIJAC ALARM COMPANY MISSION REPROGRAPHICS MOORE FLOORING INC MSA INLAND EMPIRE/DESERT CHAPTER MUNSON, MICHELLE NAPA AUTO PARTS NATIONAL CNG & FLEET SERVICE NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION RENTALS INC NORMAN, BRETT NPI PRODUCTION SERVICES INC NUNNALLY, DONALD OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CTRS OF CA OCLC INC ONTARIO WINNELSON CO PETES ROAD SERVICE INC PHYSIO CONTROL INC PLUMMER, JACQUES PRE -PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC PRO -LINE INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS INC QUICK LANE TIRE & AUTO CENTER RANCHO SMOG CENTER RED WING SHOE STORE RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON ROADRUNNER PHARMACY ROTARY CORPORATION ROYAL WHOLESALE ELECTRIC SAFE -ENTRY TECHNICAL INC SAN BERNARDINO CTY SBPEA SC FUELS Fire 1.377.76 0.00 69.61 0.00 175.00 0.00 47,734.49 0.00 1,702.46 0.00 24,993.17 0.00 3,505.00 1,606.00 0.00 4,782.48 645.16 0.00 7,424.71 1,287.69 600.00 0.00 27,240.28 0.00 0.00 162.00 930.96 0.00 102.18 0.00 487.00 0.00 157.53 0.00 3,224.00 0.00 84.48 0.00 104,966.22 0.00 20.00 0.00 0.00 155.67 0.00 377.02 1,300.67 0.00 120.00 0.00 0.00 370.00 52,500.00 0.00 341.30 0.00 229.41 247.43 55.41 0.00 195.56 0.00 911.66 0.00 0.00 30,240.00 0.00 589.53 96.59 0.00 1,817.75 0.00 242.65 0.00 210.00 0.00 2,103.35 0.00 33,719.75 34,517.94 679.43 0.00 301.01 0.00 1,677.18 0.00 0.00 200.00 15,096.90 0.00 1,580.95 0.00 40,737.08 0.00 P47 Amount 1,377.76 69.61 175.00 47,734.49 1,702.46 24,993.17 5,111.00 *** 4,782.48 645.16 8,712.40 *** 600.00 27.240.28 162.00 930.96 102.18 487.00 157.53 3,224.00 84.48 104,966.22 20.00 155.67 377.02 1,300.67 120.00 370.00 52,500.00 341.30 476.84 *** 55.41 195.56 911.66 30.240.00 589.53 96.59 1,817.75 242.65 210.00 2,103.35 68,237.69 *** 679.43 301.01 1,677.18 200.00 15,096.90 1,580.95 40,737.08 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 4 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PO RTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait 1 Current Date: 09/27/2017 Time: 07:51:08 Check No. Check Date 00383708 00383709 00383710 00383711 00383712 00383715 00383716 00383717 00383718 00383719 00383720 00383724 00383725 00383726 00383727 00383728 00383729 00383730 00383731 00383732 00383733 00383734 00383735 00383736 00383737 00383738 00383739 00383740 00383741 00383742 00383743 00383744 00383745 00383746 00383747 00383748 00383749 00383750 00383751 00383752 00383755 00383756 00383758 00383759 00383760 00383761 00383762 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/13/2017 09/14/2017 09/14/2017 09/14/2017 09/14/2017 09/14/2017 09/14/2017 09/14/2017 09/14/2017 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 9/12/2017 through 9/26/2017 Vendor Name SC FUELS SC FUELS SCHAEFER, PAUL SERRATO & ASSOCIATES SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES SHOETERIA SIGN SHOP, THE SKILLPATH SEMINARS SO CALIF GAS COMPANY SONSRAY MACHINERY LLC SOUTH COAST AQMD SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SPRINT STREAMLINE PRESS INC SUPERION LLC TARGET SUPPLIES THE COUNSELING TEAM INTERNATIONAL THOMPSON PLUMBING SUPPLY INC THOMSON REUTERS WEST PUBLISHING CORP TICKET ENVELOPE COMPANY TOVEY/SHULTZ CONSTRUCTION INC TOXGUARD FLUID TECHNOLOGIES INC U.S. BANK PARS ACCT #6746022500 U.S. BANK PARS ACCT #6746022500 U.S. BANK PARS ACCT #6746022500 UPS VALLEY POWER SYSTEMS INC VASTA, WILLIAM VERIZON BUSINESS VICTOR MEDICAL COMPANY VIRTUAL PROJECT MANAGER INC VIVERAE INC WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY WESTERN UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCE WOLFBROWN LLC YORK INSURANCE SERVICES GROUP INC ZOETIS US LLC ABC LOCKSMITHS BRODART BOOKS DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION EMCOR SERVICE EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS FASTENAL COMPANY INTERSTATE BATTERIES KME FIRE APPARATUS P48 C Fire Amount 2,429.83 0.00 971.25 245.00 446.95 20,129.48 0.00 149.00 1,225.49 4,610.24 1,768.04 38,283.22 49.61 78.09 0.00 225.20 102,200.92 135.46 0.00 462.88 347.55 660.00 339,852.11 787.69 19,859.85 6,605.00 1,582.96 167.97 0.00 525.00 30.03 3,739.02 500.00 1,238.40 1,136.35 330.00 1,500.00 13,791.50 179.73 530.53 1,271.93 222.99 69,718.73 194.31 72.55 85.73 0.00 0.00 804.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 169.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,545.95 0.00 0.00 131.97 0.00 0.00 0.00 360.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,321.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 103.42 9,600.54 2,429.83 804.21 971.25 245.00 446.95 20,129.48 169.92 149.00 1,225.49 4,610.24 1,768.04 40,829.17 49.61 78.09 131.97 225.20 102,200.92 135.46 360.00 462.88 347.55 660.00 339,852.11 787.69 19,859.85 6,605.00 1,582.96 167.97 1.321.60 525.00 30.03 3,739.02 500.00 1.238.40 1.136.35 330.00 1.500.00 13,791.50 179.73 530.53 1,271.93 222.99 69,718.73 194.31 72.55 189.15 9,600.54 *** *** User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 5 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PO Current Date: 09/27/2017 RTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait L Time: 07:51:08 Check No. Check Date 00383763 00383764 00383765 00383766 00383767 00383768 00383769 00383770 00383771 00383772 00383773 00383774 00383775 00383776 00383777 00383778 00383779 00383780 00383781 00383782 00383783 00383784 00383785 00383786 00383787 00383792 00383793 00383794 00383795 00383796 00383797 00383798 00383799 00383800 00383801 00383802 00383803 00383804 00383805 00383806 00383807 00383808 00383809 00383810 00383811 00383812 00383813 09/14/2017 09/14/2017 09/14/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 9/12/2017 through 9/26/2017 Vendor Name OFFICE DEPOT ORKIN PEST CONTROL VISTA PAINT A & A AUTOMOTIVE AND TIRE INC. A AND R TIRE SERVICE A.Y. NURSERY INC. ACTION AWARDS INC. ADOBE ANIMAL HOSPITAL AFLAC GROUP INSURANCE ALBERTA. WEBB ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT ALL SPEC WELDING SOLUTIONS INC. ALLIED NETWORK SOLUTIONS INC ALLSTAR AUTO CENTER ALSHAMISI, SAIF AQUABIO ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES INC. ARROW TRAILER SUPPLIES INC AUTO AND RV SPECIALISTS INC. BERMINGHAM, GENEVIEVE G. BERNELL HYDRAULICS INC BOTROS, GEORGE BRAUER, EDWARD BRAUN BLAISING SMITH WYNNE P.C. BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERVICES INC. CVWD CVWD CABLE INC. CAJAS, THALIA CALIFORNIA, STATE OF CAMPOS, ENMA P. CARDENAS, MARIA CCS ORANGE COUNTY JANITORIAL INC. CDW GOVERNMENT INC. CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS CHEMSEARCH CHINO MOWER AND ENGINE SERVICE CINTAS CORPORATION #150 CLIENT FIRST CONSULTING GROUP CLIMATEC LLC COMMUNITY BANK COMPRESSED AIR SPECIALTIES COPIES & INK PRINTING INC. CORELOGIC SOLUTIONS LLC CORODATA MEDIA STORAGE INC CROP PRODUCTION SERVICES INC P49 Fire Amount 1,215.19 710.78 234.70 0.00 232.15 0.00 1,924.62 0.00 2,706.01 0.00 271.88 0.00 17.01 0.00 200.00 0.00 6,177.54 0.00 1,187.50 0.00 47,257.75 0.00 303.86 0.00 9,964.72 0.00 618.77 0.00 64.21 0.00 1,250.00 0.00 244.43 0.00 57.92 0.00 192.00 0.00 949.20 0.00 12.85 0.00 192.00 0.00 2,660.25 0.00 54,998.72 0.00 6,736.48 0.00 120,921.61 937.77 3,738.50 0.00 54.00 0.00 1,656.00 0.00 1,900.00 0.00 64.00 0.00 5,216.20 0.00 1,090.11 0.00 3,231.77 0.00 2,310.77 0.00 0.00 668.62 526.75 0.00 50.43 0.00 0.00 232.33 8,716.17 0.00 1,350.75 0.00 1,994.75 0.00 0.00 2,099.28 641.87 0.00 250.00 0.00 2,227.30 0.00 1,402.80 0.00 1,925.97 *** 234.70 232.15 1,924.62 2,706.01 271.88 17.01 200.00 6,177.54 1,187.50 47,257.75 303.86 9,964.72 618.77 64.21 1,250.00 244.43 57.92 192.00 949.20 12.85 192.00 2,660.25 54,998.72 6,736.48 121,859.38 *** 3,738.50 54.00 1,656.00 1,900.00 64.00 5,216.20 1,090.11 3,231.77 2,310.77 668.62 526.75 50.43 232.33 8.716.17 1,350.75 1.994.75 2,099.28 641.87 250.00 2,227.30 1,402.80 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_P LOPEZ Page: 6 ORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Current Date: 09/27/2017 Register Portrait I Time: 07:51:08 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 9/1 2/2 01 7 through 9/26/2017 P50 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Cit ' Fire Amount AP 00383814 09/20/2017 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 980.53 0.00 980.53 AP 00383815 09/20/2017 D M CONTRACTING INC 47,164.24 0.00 47,164.24 AP 00383816 09/20/2017 DATAMARS INC. 1,354.96 0.00 1,354.96 AP 00383817 09/20/2017 DAVISON, JD 1,238.83 0.00 1,238.83 AP 00383818 09/20/2017 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 2,249.00 0.00 2,249.00 AP 00383819 09/20/2017 DESER, ABIGAIL 1,400.00 0.00 1,400.00 AP 00383820 09/20/2017 DUMBELL MAN FITNESS EQUIPMENT, THE 150.00 0.00 150.00 AP 00383821 09/20/2017 EMBROIDME 3,150.41 0.00 3,150.41 AP 00383822 09/20/2017 ENTERSECT CORP 79.00 0.00 79.00 AP 00383823 09/20/2017 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS 0.00 126.02 126.02 AP 00383824 09/20/2017 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 12.49 0.00 12.49 AP 00383825 09/20/2017 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 29.75 0.00 29.75 AP 00383826 09/20/2017 FLATWOODS PRODUCTIONS INC 16,275.00 0.00 16,275.00 AP 00383827 09/20/2017 FLEET SERVICES INC. 0.00 200.74 200.74 AP 00383828 09/20/2017 FLINT TRADING INC 2,651.52 0.00 2.651.52 AP 00383829 09/20/2017 FOYER, MATT 192.00 0.00 192.00 AP 00383830 09/20/2017 G AND M BUSINESS INTERIORS 15,935.50 0.00 15,935.50 AP 00383831 09/20/2017 GAIL MATERIALS 1,210.47 0.00 1,210.47 AP 00383832 09/20/2017 GALE, BRIAN 833.00 0.00 833.00 AP 00383833 09/20/2017 GILKEY, JOHN 5,595.00 0.00 5,595.00 AP 00383834 09/20/2017 GOLDEN STATE RISK MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY 101,669.00 1,306.00 102,975.00 *** AP 00383835 09/20/2017 GRAINGER 640.33 0.00 640.33 AP 00383836 09/20/2017 GREAVES, JANET 192.00 0.00 192.00 AP 00383837 09/20/2017 GTFO GAMES LLC 295.00 0.00 295.00 AP 00383838 09/20/2017 GYROSCOPE INC 19,000.00 0.00 19,000.00 AP 00383839 09/20/2017 HARVEY, DOUG 192.00 0.00 192.00 AP 00383840 09/20/2017 HDL SOFTWARE LLC. 13,345.88 0.00 13,345.88 AP 00383841 09/20/2017 HENRY SCHEIN ANIMAL HEALTH SUPPLY 46.15 0.00 46.15 AP 00383842 09/20/2017 HI WAY SAFETY INC 6,029.58 0.00 6,029.58 AP 00383843 09/20/2017 HILL, MATT 0.00 26.89 26.89 AP 00383844 09/20/2017 HILLS PET NUTRITION SALES INC 441.24 0.00 441.24 AP 00383845 09/20/2017 HMC ARCHITECTS 0.00 13,185.00 13,185.00 AP 00383846 09/20/2017 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 645 2,089.35 0.00 2.089.35 AP 00383847 09/20/2017 HOSE MAN INC 16.16 0.00 16.16 AP 00383848 09/20/2017 HOSSEINIFAR, NEGAR 7.11 0.00 7.11 AP 00383849 09/20/2017 INTERNATIONAL CREATIVE MANAGEMENT PARTNEI 10,000.00 0.00 10.000.00 AP 00383850 09/20/2017 INTERNATIONAL LINE BUILDERS INC 113,523.25 0.00 113.523.25 AP 00383851 09/20/2017 KLINGER, MARY K 224.00 0.00 224.00 AP 00383852 09/20/2017 LANDCARE USA LLC 47,376.48 0.00 47,376.48 AP 00383853 09/20/2017 LANG, BRITTANY 50.84 0.00 50.84 AP 00383854 09/20/2017 LAWSON, DESIREE 29.99 0.00 29.99 AP 00383855 09/20/2017 LEIGHTON CONSULTING INC 10,323.30 0.00 10,323.30 AP 00383856 09/20/2017 LEIGHTON CONSULTING INC 4,700.00 0.00 4,700.00 AP 00383857 09/20/2017 LEON, LYDIA 48.77 0.00 48.77 AP 00383858 09/20/2017 LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS LLC 10,583.14 0.00 10,583.14 AP 00383859 09/20/2017 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 3,668.50 135.00 3,803.50 *** AP 00383860 09/20/2017 LINARES, JOSHUA 500.00 0.00 500.00 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 7 Current Date: 09/27/2017 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAITCONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 07:51:08 Check No. Check Date AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP 00383861 00383862 00383863 00383864 00383865 00383866 00383867 00383868 00383869 00383870 00383871 00383872 00383873 00383874 00383875 00383876 00383877 00383878 00383879 00383880 00383881 00383882 00383883 00383884 00383885 00383886 00383887 00383888 00383889 00383890 00383891 00383892 00383893 00383894 00383895 00383896 00383897 00383898 00383899 00383900 00383901 00383902 00383903 00383904 00383905 00383906 00383911 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 9/12/2017 through 9/26/2017 Vendor Name LINNELL, SHERRY LSQ FUNDING GROUP LC MAGELLAN ADVISORS LLC MAIN STREET SIGNS MARIPOSA LANDSCAPES INC MARK CHRISTOPHER INC MC AVOY & MARKHAM MCKINNEY, ALAYA MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL INC MIJAC ALARM COMPANY MISSION REPROGRAPHICS MOORE, RACHEL MORE THAN MEETS THE EYE TOURING INC MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR NATIONAL QUARTERS NEWCOMB ANDERSON MCCORMICK INC NUNEZ, CLAUDIA OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CTRS OF CA OPTION ONE PLUMBING PEPSI -COLA PETROVICH, VICTORIA PINES MOBILE HOME PARK, THE PIONEER MANUFACTURING PRO -LINE INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS INC PSA PRINT GROUP R AND R AUTOMOTIVE RANCHO SMOG CENTER RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE RESOURCE BUILDING MATERIALS RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON RJM DESIGN GROUP INC ROSS, TAYLOR JACKSON ROTO ROOTER RUBENS AUTO COLLISION CENTER SAN BERNARDINO CO FIRE DEPT SAN BERNARDINO CTY SANFT, THOMAS SARGENT TOWN PLANNING INC SEXTON, QUINT SHRED PROS SILVER & WRIGHT LLP SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC SMITH, JOHANNA SMITH, MICHAEL SO CALIF GAS COMPANY SOUTH COAST AQMD SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON P51 Fire Amount 833.00 0.00 0.00 523.32 28,977.27 0.00 86.09 0.00 30,413.26 1,208.16 0.00 261.23 2,711.80 0.00 33.50 0.00 11,270.00 0.00 26,934.00 0.00 8.40 0.00 733.00 0.00 37,200.00 0.00 1,131.62 0.00 8.57 0.00 2,614.39 2,502.38 5,933.20 0.00 386.95 0.00 495.00 0.00 687.30 0.00 833.00 0.00 400.00 0.00 1,924.85 0.00 351.65 0.00 205.80 38.79 2,235.85 0.00 350.00 0.00 513.71 0.00 926.23 0.00 411.79 0.00 18,290.05 0.00 192.00 0.00 700.00 812.87 2,115.88 0.00 2,842.00 0.00 0.00 11,709.53 242.24 0.00 267,957.93 0.00 207.50 0.00 0.00 35.00 1,762.28 0.00 7,518.71 0.00 833.00 0.00 36.73 0.00 888.71 245.27 0.00 505.74 194,340.59 0.00 833.00 523.32 28,977.27 86.09 31,621.42 *** 261.23 2,711.80 33.50 11,270.00 26,934.00 8.40 733.00 37,200.00 1,131.62 8.57 5,116.77 *** 5,933.20 386.95 495.00 687.30 833.00 400.00 1,924.85 351.65 244.59 *** 2,235.85 350.00 513.71 926.23 411.79 18,290.05 192.00 1,512.87 *** 2,115.88 2,842.00 11,709.53 242.24 267,957.93 207.50 35.00 1,762.28 7,518.71 833.00 36.73 1,133.98 *** 505.74 194,340.59 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 8 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PO RTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Current Date: 09/27/2017 Register Portrait I Time: 07:51:08 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 9/12/2017 through 9/26/2017 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP 00383912 00383913 00383914 00383915 00383916 00383917 00383918 00383919 00383920 00383921 00383922 00383923 00383924 00383925 00383926 00383927 00383932 00383933 00383934 00383935 00383936 00383937 00383938 00383939 00383940 00383941 00383942 00383943 00383944 00383945 00383946 00383947 00383948 00383949 00383950 00383951 00383952 00383953 00383954 00383955 00383958 00383959 00383960 00383961 00383962 00383963 00383964 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/20/2017 09/21/2017 09/21/2017 09/21/2017 09/21/2017 09/21/2017 09/21/2017 09/21/2017 09/21/2017 09/21/2017 SOUTHLAND SPORTS OFFICIALS SUN BADGE CO SWANK MOTION PICTURES INC SYCAMORE VILLA MOBILE HOME PARK THEATRICAL LIGHTING & SCENIC SERVICES LLC TORRENCE, STEVEN TWIN BUSCH LP UNITED PACIFIC SERVICES INC UNITED WAY UPBEAT PARADE PRODUCTIONS UPS UPTERGROVE, PATRICK UTILIQUEST VAN DER POL, SARAH VAN SCOYOC ASSOCIATES INC VERIZON VERIZON WIRELESS - LA VERIZON WIRELESS - LA VERIZON WIRELESS - LA VERIZON WIRELESS - LA VERIZON WIRELESS - LA VERIZON WIRELESS - LA VERIZON WIRELESS - LA VICTOR MEDICAL COMPANY VICTOR MEDICAL COMPANY VICTORINO, VALERIE WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY WELLS, JUDITH WEST COAST LIGHTS & SIRENS WEST END MATERIAL SUPPLY WESTLAND GROUP INC WHITE CAP CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY WILSON, PRINCESS WIRZ AND COMPANY XEROX FINANCIAL SERVICES ZALEWSKI, JOHN ZOETIS US LLC ASSI SECURITY AIRGAS USA LLC BRODART BOOKS CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO INC EMCOR SERVICE EMCOR SERVICE HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN INTERSTATE BATTERIES 480.00 458.82 1,348.00 200.00 400.00 0.00 261.96 47,362.00 124.00 12,000.00 28.04 0.00 2,565.07 192.00 4,000.00 27.76 5,671.98 60.12 100.70 182.81 573.15 107.48 5,101.94 6,911.85 4,405.67 25.86 6,889.85 3,939.68 67.41 0.00 297.99 15,750.00 965.56 32.90 533.36 298.38 833.00 135.88 0.00 79.61 3,646.17 450.88 0.00 11,039.00 7,705.05 600.00 535.57 Fire 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,300.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 60.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 404.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 405.00 270.60 0.00 0.00 2,526.00 7,141.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 P52 Amount 480.00 458.82 1,348.00 200.00 400.00 2.300.00 261.96 47,362.00 124.00 12,000.00 28.04 60.00 2,565.07 192.00 4,000.00 27.76 5.671.98 60.12 100.70 182.81 573.15 107.48 5,101.94 6,911.85 4,405.67 25.86 6,889.85 3,939.68 67.41 404.42 297.99 15,750.00 965.56 32.90 533.36 298.38 833.00 135.88 405.00 350.21 *** 3,646.17 450.88 2,526.00 18,180.00 *** 7,705.05 600.00 535.57 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 9 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAITCONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Current Date: 09/27/2017 Time: 07:51:08 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Agenda Check Register 9/12/2017 through 9/26/2017 AP 00383965 09/21/2017 LIMS AUTO INC AP 00383968 09/21/2017 OFFICE DEPOT AP 00383969 09/21/2017 ORKIN PEST CONTROL AP 00383970 09/21/2017 SUNRISE FORD AP 00383971 09/21/2017 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION AP 00383972 09/26/2017 CURATALO, JAMES AP 00383973 09/26/2017 KIRKPATRICK, WILLIAM AP 00383974 09/26/2017 LONCAR, PHILIP AP 00383975 09/26/2017 TOWNSEND, JAMES AP 00383976 09/26/2017 WALKER, KENNETH Note: *** Check Number includes both City and Fire District expenditures P53 Cit: Fire Amount 581.85 0.00 581.85 6,910.42 185.10 7,095.52 *** 0.00 298.00 298.00 962.12 0.00 962.12 1,979.55 639.56 2,619.11 *** 0.00 1,733.29 1.733.29 0.00 1,629.55 1,629.55 0.00 1,019.78 1,019.78 0.00 1,733.29 1,733.29 0.00 261.76 261.76 Total City: $6,613,190.82 Total Fire: $351,938.68 Grand Total: $6,965,129.50 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 10 Current Date: 09/27/2017 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAITCONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 07:51:08 P54 DATE: TO: FROM: INITIATED BY: SUBJECT: October 4, 2017 Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager 4. G Candyce Burnett, City Planner v''Fa�' Jennifer Nakamura, Associate Planner STAFF REPORT REPORT IN CONFORMANCE WITH CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE 65858 ON MEASURES TAKEN TO ALLEVIATE THE NEED FOR INTERIM ORDINANCE 900-A. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file this staff report in conformance with California Government Code Section 65858 on the measures taken by the City to alleviate the need for Interim Ordinance 900-A. BACKGROUND: On December 7, 2016, the City Council adopted Urgency Ordinance No. 900-A, which extended Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 900 prohibiting all commercial non-medical marijuana activity within the City. prohibiting outdoor marijuana cultivation and adopting regulations regarding indoor cultivation in private residences. The temporary interim urgency ordinance, if not extended, is set to expire on November 15, 2017. ANALYSIS: Section 65858(d) of the California Government Code provides that ten (10) days prior to the expiration of the interim urgency ordinance, the legislative body shall issue a written report describing measures taken to alleviate conditions that led to the adoption of the urgency interim ordinance. The following specific activities are currently being undertaken: • Conducting analysis of Proposition 64 (Adult Use of Marijuana Act) and how to address any necessary development standards for personal cultivation as required by the Act; • Conducting analysis of Senate Bill 94 which created a single regulatory scheme for both medical and non-medical cannabis and determining how best to write the ordinance to prohibit both medical and non-medical cannabis uses as allowed by law; • Studying recently adopted ordinances from other California cities to determine any "best practice" standards as might be applicable in the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and • Responding to numerous public inquiries regarding the current interim ordinance and reviewing the proposed licensing program under development by the State; and Page 1 of 2 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT REPORT IN CONFORMANCE WITH CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE 65858 ON MEASURES TAKEN TO ALLEVIATE THE NEED FOR INTERIM ORDINANCE 900-A. OCTOBER 4, 2017 • Drafting a permanent ordinance to prohibit all marijuana/cannabis activity within the City and will be bringing forth a permanent ordinance for consideration on October 18, 2017. The above reflect the actions taken during this short period necessary to extend the interim urgency ordinance currently in effect. An opportunity for full public comment on the extension of Ordinance No. 900-A will be provided at the City Council's Public Hearing to be held on October 18, 2017. FISCAL IMPACT: None COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Not Applicable ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 — Ordinance 900-A Do net 0 r,f 0 P55 P56 ORDINANCE NO. 900-A AN INTERIM ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, EXTENDING URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 900, PROHIBITING ALL COMMERCIAL NON-MEDICAL MARIJUANA ACTIVITY IN THE CITY, PROHIBITING OUTDOOR MARIJUANA CULTIVATION ON PRIVATE RESIDENCES, AND ADOPTING REGULATIONS REGARDING INDOOR CULTIVATION IN PRIVATE RESIDENCES AND DECLARING THE URGENCY THEREOF A. Recitals. 1. On November 16, 2016, the City Council adopted Urgency Ordinance No. 900, prohibiting all commercial cannabis uses in the City, prohibiting outdoor marijuana cultivation on private residences and adopting regulations regarding indoor cultivation in private residences. 2. On December 7, 2016, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing concerning the extension of Urgency Ordinance No. 900. Ten (10) days prior to the expiration of Urgency Ordinance No. 900, the City Council will issue a report as described in Government Code Section 65858(d). 3. Pursuant to the authority set forth in Government Code Section 65858(a), it is the intent of the City Council in adopting this Urgency Ordinance to extend Urgency Ordinance No. 900 and to continue to prohibiting all commercial cannabis uses in the City, prohibiting outdoor marijuana cultivation on private residences and adopting regulations regarding indoor cultivation in private residences for a period of ten (10) months, fifteen (15) days based on the findings set forth below. 4. The Control, Regulate and Tax Adult Use of Marijuana Act ("AUMA") was approved by the voters on November 8, 2016. The AUMA, among other things, legalizes the use of non- medical marijuana for those who are 21 years of age or older and establishes a comprehensive system to regulate commercial non-medical marijuana activity. The provisions of the AUMA related to the possession, use, and cultivation of non-medical marijuana became effective on November 9, 2016. 5. The AUMA permits cities to: (1) adopt and enforce local ordinances to regulate non-medical marijuana businesses, including, but not limited to, local zoning and land use requirements, business license requirements, and requirements related to reducing exposure to secondhand smoke, or (2) completely prohibit the establishment or operation of one or more types of marijuana businesses within its jurisdiction. 6. The AUMA grants State agencies the authority to create, issue, renew, discipline, suspend, or revoke licenses for marijuana businesses provided that a State licensing authority shall not approve an application for a State license for commercial non-medical marijuana activity if approval of the State license will violate the provisions of any local ordinance. Furthermore, the AUMA requires the State to begin issuing licenses to non-medical marijuana businesses by January 1, 2018. ATTACHMENT 1 Ordinance No. 900-A— Page 1 of 6 P57 7. The AUMA allows for the planting, cultivation, harvesting, drying, and processing ("cultivation activities") of up to six marijuana plants in, or upon the grounds of, a private residence. The AUMA authorizes a city to enact and enforce an ordinance that reasonably regulates cultivation activities, and to completely prohibit cultivation activities outdoors upon the grounds of a private residence unless the California Attorney General determines that non-medical use of marijuana is lawful in the State under federal law. 8. The Federal Controlled Substances Act, 21 U.S.C. § 801, et seq., classifies marijuana as a Schedule 1 Drug, which is defined as a drug or other substance that has a high potential for abuse, that has no currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States, and that has not been accepted as safe for use under medical supervision. The Federal Controlled Substances Act makes it unlawful under Federal law for any person to cultivate, manufacture, distribute or dispense, or possess with intent to manufacture, distribute, or dispense marijuana. 9. Cities in California have reported negative effects of marijuana cultivation, processing, and distribution activities, including offensive odors, illegal sales and distribution of marijuana, trespassing, theft, violent robberies and robbery attempts, fire hazards, and problems associated with mold, fungus, and pests. Furthermore, as marijuana plants begin to flower, and for a period of two months or more, the plants produce a strong, unique odor, offensive to many people, and detectable far beyond property boundaries if grown outdoors. This odor can have the effect of encouraging theft by alerting persons to the location of the valuable plants, and creating a risk of burglary, robbery, or armed robbery of the plants and creating the potential for violent acts related to such criminal activity. 10. The City has introduced and conducted a second reading of Ordinance No. 897 that prohibits all cannabis (also known as marijuana) cultivation and commercial cannabis uses in the City. Ordinance No. 897 will go into effect on December 2, 2016. Ordinance No. 897 was enacted in response to the Medical Cannabis Regulation and Safety Act, which established a State licensing scheme related to medical cannabis and primarily prohibits medical cannabis activities. 11. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council hereby ordains as follows: Section 1. The City Council finds that the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. Section 2. Based upon facts found to be true in Section 1 of this Ordinance and all other information available to the City Council concerning the subject matter of this Ordinance, the City Council finds that commercial cannabis activities and the unregulated cultivation of marijuana pursuant to the AUMA in the City before the City has an opportunity to adopt regulations pursuant to the standard procedures of the City would create a public health and safety danger. Based on the City's need for additional time to fully evaluate the primary and secondary effects of the activities to be licensed under the AUMA, the City Council finds that the immediate preservation of the public health, safety and welfare requires that this interim Ordinance be enacted as an urgency ordinance pursuant to Government Code Section 65858 and take effect immediately upon adoption, and its urgency is hereby declared. Ordinance No. 900-A — Page 2 of 6 P58 Section 3. Definitions. Hereinafter in this Ordinance, the following words shall have the meanings set forth below unless the context otherwise permits or requires: "AUMA" refers to the Control, Regulate and Tax Adult Use of Marijuana Act. "Commercial non-medical marijuana activity" shall include the cultivation, possession, manufacture, distribution, processing, storing, laboratory testing, labeling, transportation, delivery, or sale of marijuana and marijuana products for non-medical purposes. "Cultivation" shall include any activity involving the planting, growing, harvesting, drying, curing, grading, or trimming of marijuana. "Delivery" shall mean the commercial transfer of marijuana or marijuana products to a customer. Delivery also includes the use by a retailer of any technology platform owned and controlled by retailer, or independently licensed under the AUMA that enables customers to arrange for or facilitate the commercial transfer by a State licensed retailer of marijuana or marijuana products. "Marijuana" shall include all parts of the plant Cannabis sativa L., whether growing or not; the seeds thereof; the resin extracted from any part of the plant; and every compound, manufacture, salt, derivative, mixture or preparation of the plant, its seeds or resin. It does not include (a) industrial hemp, as defined in Section 11018.5 of the Health and Safety Code; (b) the weight of any other ingredient combined with marijuana to prepare topical or oral administrations, food, drink, or other product; and (c) marijuana that is cultivated, processed, transported, distributed, or sold for medical purposes under Chapter 3.4 of Division 8 of the Business and Professions Code. Section 4. Prohibitions and Regulations. a. Commercial non-medical marijuana activity is expressly prohibited in all zones and all specific plan areas in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. No person shall establish, operate, maintain, conduct, or allow commercial non-medical marijuana activity anywhere within the City. No application for a building permit, conditional use permit, business license, or any other entitlement authorizing the establishment, operation, maintenance, development, or construction of any use that allows for commercial non-medical marijuana activity shall be accepted or approved during the term of the prohibition established in this Ordinance. b. This Section 4 is intended in part to prohibit all activities for which a State license is required pursuant to the AUMA. Accordingly, the City shall not issue any permit, license, or other entitlement for any activity for which a State license is required under the AUMA. The City shall also not issue any local license to a non-profit pursuant to provisions of Business and Professions Code section 26070.5. c. To the extent not already prohibited elsewhere in this Section 4, delivery of marijuana, marijuana products, or both originating in the City, terminating in the City, or both is expressly prohibited. No person shall conduct or perform any delivery of any marijuana or marijuana product, which delivery either originates in the City, terminates in the City, or both. d. Marijuana shall not be cultivated outdoors upon the grounds of a private residence. Indoor marijuana cultivation will be allowed only as set forth in State law, which permits no more than six live marijuana plants to be planted, cultivated, harvested, dried, or processed within a Ordinance No. 900-A — Page 3 of 6 P59 single private residence or inside a fully enclosed and secured accessory structure located upon the grounds of a private residence that is fully enclosed and secured. No person shall cultivate marijuana in any manner that causes any of the following conditions: 1. Light, glare, odor, noise, or vibration that is or whose effect is either detrimental to public health, safety, or welfare or interferes with the reasonable enjoyment of life or property; or 2. Any violation of Section 17.64.120 of the Municipal Code. e. Any marijuana cultivation that exceeds the limits set forth in this Section 4 is prohibited, is unlawful, and constitutes a public nuisance. f. Nothing in this Ordinance or its adoption shall be deemed to affect any other prohibitions or regulations relating to marijuana in the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, including, but not limited to, Ordinance No. 897, except to the extent that State law allows cultivation of marijuana consistent with the restrictions set forth in this Ordinance. The City will not enforce those provisions of Ordinance No. 897 that prohibit the personal indoor cultivation of up to 6 live marijuana plants in a manner consistent with State law and subsections d and e above. Nothing in this Ordinance shall be deemed to affect or excuse any violation of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code or of Ordinance No. 897, except as otherwise described in this Section 4. g. Nothing in this Ordinance shall be interpreted to the effect that the City's permissive zoning scheme allows any other use not specifically listed therein. Section 5. Public Nuisance. Any use or condition caused, or permitted to exist, in violation of any provision of this Ordinance shall be, and hereby is declared to be, a public nuisance and may be summarily abated by the City pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 731 or by any other remedy available to the City. Section 6. Penalty. Violation of any provision of this Ordinance shall constitute a misdemeanor and shall be punishable by a fine not to exceed one thousand dollars ($1,000) or by imprisonment for a period not to exceed six (6) months, or by both such fine and imprisonment. Each and every day such a violation exists shall constitute a separate and distinct violation of this Ordinance. Section 7. Civil Penalties. In addition to any other enforcement permitted by this Ordinance, the City Attorney may bring a civil action for injunctive relief and civil penalties against any person or entity that violates this Interim Ordinance. In any civil action brought pursuant to this Interim Ordinance, a court of competent jurisdiction may award reasonable attorneys' fees and costs to the prevailing party. Section 8. CEQA. It can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the adoption of the Interim Ordinance may have a significant effect on the environment because the Interim Ordinance will only impose greater and temporary limitations on marijuana -related uses allowed in the City, and will thereby serve to prevent potentially significant adverse environmental impacts. The City Council has reviewed staffs determination of exemption and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in staffs determination that the Interim Ordinance is exempt from CEQA. The adoption of the Interim Ordinance is therefore not subject to the California Ordinance No. 900-A — Page 4 of 6 P60 Environmental Quality Act review pursuant to Title 14, Chapter 3, Section 15061(b)(3) of the California Code of Regulations. Section 9. Severability. If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this Ordinance, is for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional. Section 10. Term. This Ordinance shall take effect concurrent with the expiration of Urgency Ordinance No. 900 at midnight on December 31, 2016, and shall remain in effect for a period of ten (10) months, fifteen (15) days is adopted as an urgency, interim ordinance and shall take effect immediately. This Ordinance shall expire, and the prohibition established hereby shall terminate, 45 days after the date of adoption unless extended by the City Council pursuant to California Government Code Section 65858. Section 11. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. Ordinance No. 900-A — Page 5 of 6 P61 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 7th day of December 2016. AYES: Alexander, Kennedy, Michael, Spagnolo, Williams NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAINED: None ATTEST: ice C. Reynolds, C y Clerk ennis Michael, ayor I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing urgency Ordinance was adopted at a Regular Meeting of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 7th day of December 2016. Executed this 8'h day of December 2016, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. ice C. Reynolds, City Glerk Ordinance No. 900-A — Page 6 of 6 P62 DATE: October 4, 2017 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT pp INITIATED BY: William Wittkopf, Public Works Services Director 1� Dean Rodia, Parks and Landscape Maintenance Superintendent Ruth Cain, CPPB, Procurement Manager SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO PURCHASE "PESTICIDES AND FERTILIZER SUPPLIES ON AN AS NEEDED BASIS" FROM UNIVAR ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS AND WILBUR-ELLIS COMPANY IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $140,000 FOR FISCAL YEAR 17/18 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council award the purchase of "Pesticides and Fertilizer Supplies on an As Needed Basis" from Univar Environmental Services, Target Specialty Products, and Wilbur - Ellis Company, in accordance with Request for Bids (RFB) #17/18-108, in an amount not to exceed $140,000 for Fiscal Year 17/18. BACKGROUND: The Public Works Services Department provides and applies pesticides and fertilizer in the parks and landscape areas throughout the City. This process helps reduce and/or eliminate unwanted pests and weeds that can impact the City's overall landscape appearance, and the health, and safety of the public. Having the capability to purchase on an "as needed basis" through a variety of vendors will help the department achieve their application goals throughout the year. ANALYSIS: The Public Works Services Department provided the Procurement Division with specifications for review and to determine the best method of procurement. The Procurement Division prepared and posted a formal Request for Bids (RFB) #17/18-108 for "Pesticides and Fertilizer Supplies on an As Needed Basis" to the City's automated procurement system. This bid was solicited as a split award to provide the greatest flexibility in staffs ability to find the supplies needed at the best price. There was a total of twenty-two (22) vendors who were notified and ten (10) prospective bidders that downloaded the solicitation documentation. Six (6) bid responses were received, with one (1) response not meeting all the required specifications. All applicable bid documentation is on file in the City's electronic bidding system and can be accessed through the City's web page. A copy of RFB #17/18-108 is attached for reference. Page 1 of 2 P63 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT — PESTICIDES AND FERTILIZER SUPPLIES OCTOBER 4, 2017 FISCAL IMPACT: While the bid process provides the best pricing available, staff will continue to operate within the limits set in the approved General and Special District budgets. Funding is budgeted in the following accounts: General Fund Parks (319) and Streets (318) Maintenance, Landscape Maintenance Districts 1-10 (130-140), and Park District 85 (848) for these purchases. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Not applicable. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 - RFB #17/18-108 "Pesticides and Fertilizer Supplies on an As Needed Basis" Page 2 of 2 P64 RANCHO CUCAMONGA REQUEST FOR BIDS ("RFB") #17/18-108 FOR FERTILIZER & PESTICIDES City of Rancho Cucamonga Procurement Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Deadline for Submissions September 13, 2017 at 3:00 p.m. Attachment 1 P65 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Bids ("RFB") # 17/18-108 for Fertilizer & Pesticides 1. GENERAL INFORMATION 1.1 INTRODUCTION The City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter the "City"), is inviting Request for Bid ("RFB") responses to the City's RFB # 17/18-108, for Fertilizer & Pesticides, in accordance with the "Specifications Worksheet, Exhibit B" attached herein. Vendors wishing to participate in the RFB solicitation must be registered as a Vendor on the City's Vendor List. Vendor registration can be accomplished by visiting the City's website at www.cityofrc.us. Only those responses received from registered Vendors will be accepted. Responses must be submitted by the named Vendor that has downloaded the RFB; this information is indicated in the bid system and provides the ability to tabulate the responses in accordance to the named Vendors. Submitting a response under a Vendor name that does not appear to be on the Prospective Bidders list will be deemed as non-responsive and disqualify said response from further consideration. Schedule of Events: Post RFB Questions Due Addendum Issued RFB Response Due Date August 23, 2017 August 31, 2017 by 1:00 pm September 7, 2017 September 13, 2017, by 3:00 pm (The City reserves the right to change the schedule of events without prior notice or responsibility to Vendor.) 1.2 BUSINESS LICENSE The selected Vendor awarded a Contract shall be required to obtain a Rancho Cucamonga Business License no later than five (5) business days from notification of award prior to being issued a Purchase Order. Awarded Vendor must possess and maintain all appropriate licenses/certifications necessary in the performance of duties required under this RFB and will provide copies of licenses/certifications immediately upon request throughout the term of the Contract. 1.3 DISCREPANCIES OR OMISSIONS Vendors finding discrepancies or omissions in the RFB or having any doubts as to the meaning or intent of any part thereof shall submit such questions or concerns in writing to the applicable Procurement contact identified herein. All questions must be in writing and no responsibility will be accepted for oral instructions. Addenda issued in correspondence to this RFB shall be considered a part of this RFB and shall become part of any final Contract that may be derived from this RFB. Submittals Due: September 13, 2017, by 3:00 PM Page 2 of 13 P66 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Bids ("RFB") # 17/18-108 for Fertilizer & Pesticides 1.4 CONTINGENCIES This RFB should not be considered as a Contract to purchase goods or services, but is a Request for Bid in accordance with the Terms and Conditions herein and will not necessarily give rise to a Contract. However, RFB responses should be as detailed and complete as possible to facilitate the formation of a Contract based on the RFB response(s) that are pursued should the City decide to do so. Completion of this RFB form and its associated Appendices are a requirement. Failure to do so may disqualify your RFB response submittal. Vendors must submit signed, RFB responses by the due date and time as specified herein. Vendors will be considered non-responsive if the above requirements are not submitted as requested. In the event that only one RFB response is received, the City reserves the right to return the RFB to the Vendor unopened. Any Scope of Work, Contingencies, Special Instruction and/or Terms and Conditions applicable to this RFB and any Purchase Order derived thereafter shall be effective as of the issue date of Purchase Order (the "Effective Date"), and shall remain in full force and effect until sixty (60) days after the City has accepted the work in writing and has made final payment, unless sooner terminated by written mutual agreement signed by both parties. 1.5 QUESTIONS AND CLARIFICATIONS All questions or clarification requests must be submitted in writing to Cheryl Combs, Procurement Technician, directly through the bid system on or before August 31, 2017 by 1:00 PM. Answers and/or clarifications will be provided in the form of an Addendum and will be posted for download from the City's bid system in accordance with the above "Schedule of Events". From the issuance date of this Request for Bid until a Vendor is awarded, Vendors are not permitted to communicate with any City staff or officials regarding this procurement, other than during interviews, demonstrations, and/or site visits, except at the direction of Ruth Cain, CPPB, Procurement Manager, or Cheryl Combs, Procurement Technician, the designated representatives of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1.6 DISPOSITION OF MATERIAL AND CONFIDENTIAL OR PROPRIETARY INFORMATION All materials submitted in response to the RFB solicitation will become the property of the City and will be returned only at the City's option and at the expense of the vendor submitting the RFB response. A copy of the RFB response will be retained for official files and become a public record. Any material that a vendor considers as confidential but does not meet the disclosure exemption requirements of the Submittals Due: September 13, 2017, by 3:00 PM Page 3 of 13 P67 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Bids ("RFB") # 17/18-108 for Fertilizer & Pesticides California Public Records Act should not be included in the vendor's RFB response as it may be made available to the public. If a vendor's RFB response contains material noted or marked as confidential and/or proprietary that, in the City's sole opinion, meets the disclosure exemption requirements, then that information will not be disclosed pursuant to a written request for public documents. If the City does not consider such material to be exempt from disclosure, the material may be made available to the public, regardless of the notation or markings. If a vendor is unsure if its confidential and/or proprietary material meets disclosure exemption requirements, then it should not include such information in its RFB response because such information may be disclosed to the public. 1.7 KNOWLEDGE OF REQUIREMENTS The vendor shall carefully review all documents referenced and made a part of the solicitation document to ensure that all information required to properly respond has been submitted or made available and all requirements are priced in the RFB response. Failure to examine any documents, drawings, specifications, or instructions will be at the Vendor's sole risk. Vendors shall be responsible for knowledge of all items and conditions contained in their RFB responses and in this RFB, including any City issued clarifications, modifications, amendments, or addenda. The City will provide notice of any changes and clarifications to perspective Vendors by way of addenda to the City website; however, it is the Vendor's responsibility to ascertain that the RFB response includes all addenda issued prior to the RFB Due Date. 1.8 BRAND NAMES Any reference to brand names and/or numbers in the solicitation is intended to be descriptive, but not restrictive, unless otherwise specified. RFB responses offering equivalent items meeting the standards of quality specified may be considered, unless other specified, providing the RFB response clearly describes the article offered and how it differs from the referenced brand. Unless a Vendor specifies otherwise, it is understood that the Vendor is offering a referenced brand item as specified in the solicitation. The City reserves the right to determine whether a substitute offer is equivalent to and meets the standards of quality indicated by the brand name references, and the City may require the supply of additional descriptive material and a sample. 1.9 RESERVATION OF RIGHTS The issuance of this RFB does not constitute an agreement by the City that any contract will actually be entered into by the City. The City expressly reserves the right at any time to: Submittals Due: September 13, 2017, by 3:00 PM Page 4 of 13 P68 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Bids ("RFB") # 17/18-108 for Fertilizer & Pesticides • Waive or correct any defect or informality in any response, RFB, or RFB procedure. • Reject any or all RFBs. • Reissue a Request for Bids. • Prior to submission deadline for RFBs, modify all or any portion of the selection procedures, including deadlines for accepting responses, the specifications or requirements for any materials, equipment or services to be provided under this RFB, or the requirements for contents or format of the RFBs. • The City recognizes that price is only one of several criteria to be used in judging a product or service, and the City is not legally bound to accept the lowest RFB response. • The City reserves the right to conduct pre -award discussions and/or pre -Contract negotiations with any or all responsive and responsible Vendors who submit RFB responses. • Procure any materials, equipment or services specified in this RFB by any other means. • Determine that no project will be pursued. • The City reserves the right to inspect the Vendor's place of business prior to award or at any time during the contract term or any extension thereof, to determine the Vendor's capabilities and qualifications. 1.10 CALIFORNIA'S PUBLIC RECORDS ACT The City of Rancho Cucamonga complies with the California Public Records Act, Government Code Section 6253. (a) Public records are open to inspection at all times during the office hours of the state or local agency and every person has a right to inspect any public record, except as hereafter provided. Any reasonably segregable portion of a record shall be available for inspection by any person requesting the record after deletion of the portions that are exempted by law. Neither a RFB in its entirety, nor proposed prices shall be considered confidential and proprietary. Notwithstanding the foregoing, companies are hereby notified that any and all materials submitted in response to this RFB are subject to California's Public Records Act. The City 's receipt, review, evaluation or any other act or omission concerning any such information shall not create an acceptance by the City or any obligation or duty to prevent the disclosure of any such information except as required by Government Code Section 6253. Companies who submit information they believe should be exempt from disclosure under the Public Records Act shall clearly mark each document as confidential, proprietary or exempt, and state the legal basis for the exemption with supporting citations to the California Code. Pursuant to California Law, if the information is requested under the Public Records Act, the City shall make a final determination if any exemption actually exists for the City to deny the Submittals Due: September 13, 2017, by 3:00 PM Page 5 of 13 P69 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Bids ("RFB") # 17/18-108 for Fertilizer & Pesticides request and prevent disclosure. The City will withhold such information from public disclosure under the Public Records Act only if the City determines, in its sole discretion, that there is a legal basis to do so. 2. RFB RESPONSE SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS The following must be received no later than the due date and time specified in the Schedule of Events. RFB responses and associated documents must be submitted electronically through the bid system. The Vendor is solely responsible for ensuring that the full RFB response is received by the City in accordance with the solicitation requirements, prior to the date and time specified in the solicitation. 2.1 SIGNED REQUEST FOR BID EXHIBITS Completion of these Exhibits are a requirement. Failure to do so may disqualify your RFB response submittal. In the event that only one RFB response is received, the City reserves the right to return the RFB to the Vendor. The following complete signed (where required) Exhibits shall be submitted electronically via Planet Bids. 2.1.1 NON -DISCLOSURE CONFLICT OF INTEREST Specify any possible conflicts of interest with your current clients or staff members and the City. A signed "Exhibit A, Conflict of Interest and Non -Disclosure Agreement," included herein must be submitted. 2.1.2 SPECIFICATIONS Vendor shall review and complete "Exhibit B, Standard Specification Form". Vendors must indicate compliance with specifications by a check mark or initials in the "MEETS", "EXCEEDS", "NO" or "N/A". Indicating "MEETS" to a specification will mean full compliance; indicating "NO" will mean an exception is being taken. All exceptions must be fully explained on a separate page titled "EXCEPTIONS", giving reference to the page and specification where the exception is being taken. Failure to comply with this requirement will result in the response being rejected. 2.1.3 ADDENDUM ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The Vendor shall hereby acknowledge they have received all posted Addendums, if any. The Vendor understands failure to acknowledge any addenda issued may cause the response to be considered non-responsive. It is the Vendor's responsibility to log into the Bid System to identify, download and review the number of addenda that have been posted. Addenda issued in correspondence to this RFB shall be considered a part of this RFB and shall become part of any final Contract that may be Submittals Due: September 13, 2017, by 3:00 PM Page 6 of 13 P70 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Bids ("RFB") # 17/18-108 for Fertilizer & Pesticides derived from this RFB. Vendors must indicate their acknowledgement of any Addendums by way of signature on "Exhibit C, Addendum Acknowledgement Form", and must be included with the Vendor RFB response. 2.1.4 PARTICIPATION CLAUSE It is hereby understood that other governmental entities, such as cities, counties, and special school districts may utilize this RFB response at their option for equipment or services at the RFB response price. Said entities shall have the option to participate in any award made as a result of this solicitation. Any such piggy -back awards will be made independently by each agency, and the City is not an agent, partner or representative of these agencies and is not obligated or liable for any action of debts that may arise out of such independently negotiated piggy -back procurement. Each public agency shall accept sole responsibility of its own order placement and payments to the Vendor. A signed "Exhibit D, Participation Clause", must be included with the Vendor RFB response. 2.1.5 VENDOR CERTIFICATION Vendors must verify by way of signature to "Exhibit E, Vendor Certification Form" that Vendor nor any of its proposed subcontractors are currently under suspension or debarment by any state or federal government agency, and that neither Vendor not any of its proposed subcontractors are tax delinquent with the State of California. The signed exhibit must be included under this section of the RFB response. 2.1.6 SIGNATURE OF AUTHORITY Completion of this RFB form and its associated Exhibits are a requirement. Failure to do so may disqualify your RFB response submittal. Vendors must submit responses by the due date and time as specified herein. Vendors will be considered non-responsive if the above requirements are not submitted as requested. In the event that only one RFB response is received, the City reserves the right to return the RFB to the Vendor. An "Exhibit F, Signature of Authority", must be included with the Vendor RFB response. Submittals Due: September 13, 2017, by 3:00 PM Page 7 of 13 P71 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Bids ("RFB") # 17/18-108 for Fertilizer & Pesticides "EXHIBIT A" CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CONFLICT OF INTEREST/NON-DISCLOSURE STATEMENT It is the policy of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to prevent personal or organizational conflict of interest, or the appearance of such conflict of interest, in the award and administration of City Contracts, including, but not limited to Contracts for Professional Services Agreements ("PSA") with potential Vendors. I do not have specific knowledge of confidential information in regards to RFB responses received in response to the Request for Bid RFB # 17/18-108 for Fertilizer & Pesticides. I agree not to disclose or otherwise divulge any information pertaining to the contents, status, or ranking of any RFB response to anyone. I understand the terms and "disclose or otherwise divulge" to include, but are not limited to, verbal conversations, written correspondence, reproduction of any part or any portion of any RFB response, or removal of same from designated areas. I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the following statements are true and correct and that I understand and agree to be bound by commitments contained herein. (Print Name) (Relationship to the City) (Relationship to the Consultant) (Signature) (Date) Must be included in final RFB submittal. Submittals Due: September 13, 2017, by 3:00 PM Page 8 of 13 P72 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Bids ("RFB") # 17/18-108 for Fertilizer & Pesticides "EXHIBIT B" SPECIFICATIONS WORKSHEET IMPORTANT, PLEASE NOTE; Vendors must indicate compliance with specifications by check mark or initials in the "MEETS", "EXCEEDS", "NO" or "N/A". Indicating "MEETS" to a specification will mean full compliance; indicating "NO" will mean an exception is being taken. All exceptions must be fully explained on a separate page titled "EXCEPTIONS", giving reference to the page and specification where the exception is being taken. Failure to comply with this requirement will result in the RFB response being rejected. SPECIFICATIONS MEETS EXCEEDS N/A NO COMMENTS Product Availability: All specified products must be readily available for pick-up or delivery at the City's options within ten (10) business days. When Delivery is required, deliver to: City of Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Yard, 9153 9th St., Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Receiving hours are between the hours of 6:30am and 3:30pm Mon —Thu. Please note: The quantity listed are an estimated annual purchase for the fiscal year, it is not guaranteed. Pricing must be valid through June 30, 2018 Must be included in final RFB submittal. Submittals Due: September 13, 2017, by 3:00 PM Page 9 of 13 P73 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Bids ("RFB") # 17/18-108 for Fertilizer & Pesticides "EXHIBIT C" ADDENDUM ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The Vendor hereby acknowledges the following Addenda Number(s) to this RFB have been received, if any. Vendor understands failure to acknowledge any addenda issued may cause the RFB response to be considered non-responsive. It is the Vendor's responsibility to log into the Bid system to identify and download the number of addenda that have been posted. • Signature Printed Name Title Date Must be included in final RFB submittal. Submittals Due: September 13, 2017, by 3:00 PM Page 10 of 13 P74 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Bids ("RFB") # 17/18-108 for Fertilizer & Pesticides "EXHIBIT D" PARTICIPATION CLAUSE It is hereby understood that other government entities, such as cities, counties, and special/school districts may utilize this RFB response at their option for equipment or services at the RFB response price for a period of days. Said entities shall have the option to participate in any award made as a result of this solicitation. Any such piggy -back awards will be made independently by each agency, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga is not an agent, partner or representative of these agencies and is not obligated or liable for any action of debts that may arise out of such independently negotiated piggy -back procurement. Each public agency shall accept sole responsibility of its own order placement and payments of the Vendor. Successful Vendor will extend prices as proposed herein to other governmental agencies, please specify. YES NO Must be included in final RFB submittal. Submittals Due: September 13, 2017, by 3:00 PM Page 11 of 13 P75 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Bids ("RFB") # 17/18-108 for Fertilizer & Pesticides "EXHIBIT E" VENDOR CERTIFICATION FORM I certify that neither (Vendor) nor any of its proposed subcontractors are currently under suspension or debarment by any state or federal government agency, and that neither Vendor nor any of its proposed subcontractors are tax delinquent with the State of California. I acknowledge that if Vendor or any of its subcontractors subsequently are placed under suspension or debarment by a local, state or federal government entity, or if Vendor or any of its subcontractors subsequently become delinquent in California taxes, our Bid may be disqualified. Signature Printed Name Title Date Must be included in final RFB submittal. Submittals Due: September 13, 2017, by 3:00 PM Page 12 of 13 P76 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Bids ("RFB") # 17/18-108 for Fertilizer & Pesticides "EXHIBIT F" SIGNATURE OF AUTHORITY The undersigned firm declares that he has carefully examined the specifications and read the above terms and conditions, and hereby proposes and agrees, if this RFB response is accepted, to furnish all material in accordance with the specifications and instructions, in the time and manner therein prescribed for the unit cost amounts set forth in the following RFB response. FAILURE TO DO SO MAY DEEM YOUR RFB RESPONSE AS NON- RESPONSIVE. Company Name: Address: (Street, Su. # City, State, Zip) Telephone #: Fax #: E-mail address: Web Address: Authorized Representative: (print) Title: Signature: Date: Must be included in final RFB submittal. Submittals Due: September 13, 2017, by 3:00 PM Page 13 of 13 P77 Attachement "A" Please state manufacturer's name for the below item descriptions: ItemDesc Manufacturer Ammonia Sulfate 21-0-0 Calcium Nitrate 15.5-0-0 Super Turf 25-5-5 Nitra King 19-4-4 16-8-8 with .2% Dimension 19-6-12 w/Polyon 12-8-16 Winterizer Fertilizer Calcium Nitrate Solution Grade 6-24-24 Starter Fertilizer Roots 1-2-3 2 -in -1 Rose Care Granular Prodiamine Dismiss Turf Herbicide Speedzone Southern Formula Gallery 75DF Roundup QuikPro Turflon Ester Ultra Glyphosate 41 % Garton 4 Milestone VM Dimension 270G Drive XLR8 Landmark XP Dimension 2EW Safari 20SG Merit 0.5G Advion Fire Ant Bait Termidor SC Wasp and Hornet Killer M-Pede Siesta Fire Ant Bait Atrimmec Primo Maxx 0.05% Strychnine Gopher Bait Diphacinone Ground Squirrel Bait Bayleton 50 WSP Chipco 26GT Daconil Weatherstik Fore 80WP Rainshield Subdue Maxx Black Onyx WSP Captain Aquamaster Turface Quick Dry Turface Pro League Methylated Seed Oil Non-ionic Surfactant Sluggo P78 Blazon or Equivalent Nutriwash or Equivalent P79 DATE: TO: FROM: INITIATED BY: SUBJECT: STAFF REPORT October 4, 2017 Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager J William Wittkopf, Public Works Services Director Dean Rodia, Parks and Landscape Maintenance Superintendent Ruth Cain, CPPB, Procurement Manager CONSIDERATION TO EXTEND THE AWARD FOR THE PURCHASE OF "IRRIGATION PARTS AND SUPPLIES ON AN AS NEEDED BASIS" FROM SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY, LOGANS MARKETING, AND POOL & ELECTRICAL PRODUCTS, INC. IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $120,000 ANNUALLY FOR A MAXIMUM OF $240,000 OVER A TWO-YEAR PERIOD RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council extend the award for the purchase of "Irrigation Parts and Supplies on an As Needed Basis" from SiteOne Landscape Supply, Logans Marketing, and Pool & Electrical Products, Inc., in accordance with Request for Bids (RFB) #16/17-114 in an amount not to exceed $120 000 annually for a maximum of $240,000 over a two-year period. BACKGROUND: On February 1, 2017, pursuant to RFB 16/17-114, City Council approved and awarded a contract to SiteOne Landscape Supply, Logans Marketing, and Pool & Electrical Products, Inc., for the as needed purchase of irrigation parts and supplies. These contracts were bid for a three (3) year firm fixed pricing term contract. Staff would like to continue with the services provided by SiteOne Landscape Supply, Logans Marketing, and Pool & Electrical Products, Inc for the duration of FY 17/18 and FY 18/19 which represents the remaining term of the contracts as bid in RFB #16/17-114. ANALYSIS: To maintain continuity of service and the utilization of the fixed pricing, the Public Works Services Department is requesting the existing contract be renewed for FY 17/18 and FY 18/19. FISCAL IMPACT: While the bid process provides the best pricing available, staff will continue to operate within the limits set in the approved General and Special Fund budgets. Funding is budgeted in the following accounts: General Fund Parks (319) and Streets (318) Maintenance, Landscape Maintenance Districts 1-10 (130-140), and Park District 85 (848) for these purchases. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Not applicable. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 - RFB #16/17-114 for "Irrigation Parts and Supplies on an As Needed Basis" Page 1 of 1 P80 RANCHO CUCAMONGA REQUEST FOR BIDS ("RFB") #16/17-107 FOR IRRIGATION PARTS & SUPPLIES City of Rancho Cucamonga Purchasing Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Deadline for Submissions September 15, 2016 at 3:00 p.m. P81 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Bids ("RFB") # 16/17-107 for Irrigation Parts & Supplies 1. GENERAL INFORMATION 1.1 INTRODUCTION The City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter the "City"), is inviting Request for Bid ("RFB") responses to the City's RFB # 16/17-107, for Irrigation Parts & Supplies, in accordance with the "Specifications Worksheet, Exhibit B" attached herein. Vendors wishing to participate in the RFB solicitation must be registered as a Vendor on the City's Vendor List. Vendor registration can be accomplished by visiting the City's website at www.cityofrc.us. Only those responses received from registered Vendors will be accepted. Responses must be submitted by the named Vendor that has downloaded the RFB; this information is indicated in the bid system and provides the ability to tabulate the responses in accordance to the named Vendors. Submitting a response under a Vendor name that does not appear to be on the Prospective Bidders list will be deemed as non-responsive and disqualify said response from further consideration. Schedule of Events: Post RFB Questions Due Addendum Issued RFB Response Due Date August 24, 2016 September 01, 2016 by 1:00 pm September 08, 2016 September 15, 2016, by 3:00 pm (The City reserves the right to change the schedule of events without prior notice or responsibility to Vendor.) 1.2 BUSINESS LICENSE The selected Vendor awarded a Contract shall be required to obtain a Rancho Cucamonga Business License and provide proof of license or application prior to being issued a Purchase Order. The required documentation must be provided to Cheryl Combs, Procurement Technician, via email at Cheryl.Combs@cityofRC.us no later than five (5) business days from notification of award. Awarded Vendor must possess and maintain all appropriate licenses/certifications necessary in the performance of duties required under this RFB and will provide copies of licenses/certifications immediately upon request throughout the term of the Contract. 1.3 DISCREPANCIES OR OMISSIONS Vendors finding discrepancies or omissions in the RFB or having any doubts as to the meaning or intent of any part thereof shall submit such questions or concerns in writing to the applicable Purchasing contact identified herein. All questions must be in writing and no responsibility will be accepted for oral instructions. Addenda issued in correspondence to this RFB shall be considered a part of this RFB and shall become part of any final Contract that may be derived from this RFB. Submittals Due: September 15, 2016 by 3:00 PM Page 2 of 12 P82 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Bids ("RFB") # 16/17-107 for Irrigation Parts & Supplies 1.4 CONTINGENCIES This RFB should not be considered as a Contract to purchase goods or services, but is a Request for Bid in accordance with the Terms and Conditions herein and will not necessarily give rise to a Contract. However, RFB responses should be as detailed and complete as possible to facilitate the formation of a Contract based on the RFB response(s) that are pursued should the City decide to do so. Completion of this RFB form and its associated Appendices are a requirement. Failure to do so may disqualify your RFB response submittal. Vendors must submit signed, RFB responses by the due date and time as specified herein. Vendors will be considered non-responsive if the above requirements are not submitted as requested. In the event that only one RFB response is received, the City reserves the right to return the RFB to the Vendor unopened. Any Scope of Work, Contingencies, Special Instruction and/or Terms and Conditions applicable to this RFB and any Purchase Order derived thereafter shall be effective as of the issue date of Purchase Order (the "Effective Date"), and shall remain in full force and effect until sixty (60) days after the City has accepted the work in writing and has made final payment, unless sooner terminated by written mutual agreement signed by both parties. 1.5 QUESTIONS AND CLARIFICATIONS All questions or clarification requests must be submitted in writing to Cheryl Combs, Procurement Technician, in any one of the following manners, directly through the bid system or via email at chervl.combsPcitvofrc.us, on or before September 01, 2016 by 1:00 PM. Answers and/or clarifications will be provided in the form of an Addendum and will be posted for download from the City's bid system in accordance with the above "Schedule of Events". From the issuance date of this Request for Bid until a Vendor is awarded, Vendors are not permitted to communicate with any City staff or officials regarding this procurement, other than during interviews, demonstrations, and/or site visits, except at the direction of Ruth Cain, CPPB, Procurement Manager, or Cheryl Combs, Procurement Technician, the designated representatives of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1.6 DISPOSITION OF MATERIAL AND CONFIDENTIAL OR PROPRIETARY INFORMATION All materials submitted in response to the RFB solicitation will become the property of the City and will be returned only at the City's option and at the expense of the vendor submitting the RFB response. A copy of the RFB response will be retained for official files and become a public record. Any material that a vendor considers as confidential but does not meet the disclosure exemption requirements of the Submittals Due: September 15, 2016 by 3:00 PM Page 3 of 12 P83 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Bids ("RFB") # 16/17-107 for Irrigation Parts & Supplies California Public Records Act should not be included in the vendor's RFB response as it may be made available to the public. If a vendor's RFB response contains material noted or marked as confidential and/or proprietary that, in the City's sole opinion, meets the disclosure exemption requirements, then that information will not be disclosed pursuant to a written request for public documents. If the City does not consider such material to be exempt from disclosure, the material may be made available to the public, regardless of the notation or markings. If a vendor is unsure if its confidential and/or proprietary material meets disclosure exemption requirements, then it should not include such information in its RFB response because such information may be disclosed to the public. 1.7 KNOWLEDGE OF REQUIREMENTS The vendor shall carefully review all documents referenced and made a part of the solicitation document to ensure that all information required to properly respond has been submitted or made available and all requirements are priced in the RFB response. Failure to examine any documents, drawings, specifications, or instructions will be at the Vendor's sole risk. Vendors shall be responsible for knowledge of all items and conditions contained in their RFB responses and in this RFB, including any City issued clarifications, modifications, amendments, or addenda. The City will provide notice of any changes and clarifications to perspective Vendors by way of addenda to the City website; however, it is the Vendor's responsibility to ascertain that the RFB response includes all addenda issued prior to the RFB Due Date. 1.8 BRAND NAMES Any reference to brand names and/or numbers in the solicitation is intended to be descriptive, but not restrictive, unless otherwise specified. RFB responses offering equivalent items meeting the standards of quality specified may be considered, unless other specified, providing the RFB response clearly describes the article offered and how it differs from the referenced brand. Unless a Vendor specifies otherwise, it is understood that the Vendor is offering a referenced brand item as specified in the solicitation. The City reserves the right to determine whether a substitute offer is equivalent to and meets the standards of quality indicated by the brand name references, and the City may require the supply of additional descriptive material and a sample. 1.9 RESERVATION OF RIGHTS The issuance of this RFB does not constitute an agreement by the City that any contract will actually be entered into by the City. The City expressly reserves the right at any time to: • Waive or correct any defect or informality in any response, RFB, or RFB procedure. Submittals Due: September 15, 2016 by 3:00 PM Page 4 of 12 P84 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Bids ("RFB") # 16/17-107 for Irrigation Parts & Supplies • Reject any or all RFBs. • Reissue a Request for Bids. • Prior to submission deadline for RFBs, modify all or any portion of the selection procedures, including deadlines for accepting responses, the specifications or requirements for any materials, equipment or services to be provided under this RFB, or the requirements for contents or format of the RFBs. • The City recognizes that price is only one of several criteria to be used in judging a product or service, and the City is not legally bound to accept the lowest RFB response. • The City reserves the right to conduct pre -award discussions and/or pre -Contract negotiations with any or all responsive and responsible Vendors who submit RFB responses. • Procure any materials, equipment or services specified in this RFB by any other means. • Determine that no project will be pursued. • The City reserves the right to inspect the Vendor's place of business prior to award or at any time during the contract term or any extension thereof, to determine the Vendor's capabilities and qualifications. 1.10 CALIFORNIA'S PUBLIC RECORDS ACT The City of Rancho Cucamonga complies with the California Public Records Act, Government Code Section 6253. (a) Public records are open to inspection at all times during the office hours of the state or local agency and every person has a right to inspect any public record, except as hereafter provided. Any reasonably segregable portion of a record shall be available for inspection by any person requesting the record after deletion of the portions that are exempted by law. Neither a RFB in its entirety, nor proposed prices shall be considered confidential and proprietary. Notwithstanding the foregoing, companies are hereby notified that any and all materials submitted in response to this RFB are subject to California's Public Records Act. The City 's receipt, review, evaluation or any other act or omission concerning any such information shall not create an acceptance by the City or any obligation or duty to prevent the disclosure of any such information except as required by Government Code Section 6253. Companies who submit information they believe should be exempt from disclosure under the Public Records Act shall clearly mark each document as confidential, proprietary or exempt, and state the legal basis for the exemption with supporting citations to the California Code. Pursuant to California Law, if the information is requested under the Public Records Act, the City shall make a final determination if any exemption actually exists for the City to deny the request and prevent disclosure. The City will withhold such information from public disclosure under Submittals Due: September 15, 2016 by 3:00 PM Page 5 of 12 P85 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Bids ("RFB") # 16/17-107 for Irrigation Parts & Supplies the Public Records Act only if the City determines, in its sole discretion, that there is a legal basis to do SO. 2. RFB RESPONSE SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS The following must be received no later than the due date and time specified in the Schedule of Events. RFB responses and associated documents must be submitted electronically through the bid system. The Vendor is solely responsible for ensuring that the full RFB response is received by the City in accordance with the solicitation requirements, prior to the date and time specified in the solicitation. 2.1 SIGNED REQUEST FOR BID EXHIBITS Completion of the below Exhibits are a requirement and shall be signed where required and submitted electronically via Planet Bids. Failure to do so may disqualify your RFB response submittal. In the event that only one RFB response is received, the City reserves the right to return the RFB, unopened, to the Vendor. 2.2 NON -DISCLOSURE CONFLICT OF INTEREST Specify any possible conflicts of interest with your current clients or staff members and the City. A signed "Exhibit A, Conflict of Interest and Non -Disclosure Agreement," included herein must be submitted. 2.3 SPECIFICATIONS Vendor shall review and complete "Exhibit B, Standard Specification Form". Vendors must indicate compliance with specifications by a check mark or initials in the "MEETS", "EXCEEDS", "NO" or "N/A". Indicating "MEETS" to a specification will mean full compliance; indicating "NO" will mean an exception is being taken. All exceptions must be fully explained on a separate page titled "EXCEPTIONS", giving reference to the page and specification where the exception is being taken. Failure to comply with this requirement will result in the response being rejected. 2.4 ADDENDUM ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The Vendor shall hereby acknowledge they have received all posted Addendums, if any. The Vendor understands failure to acknowledge any addenda issued may cause the response to be considered non- responsive. It is the Vendor's responsibility to log into the Bid System to identify, download and review the number of addenda that have been posted. Addenda issued in correspondence to this RFB shall be considered a part of this RFB and shall become part of any final Contract that may be derived from this RFB. Vendors must indicate their acknowledgement of any Addendums by way of signature on "Exhibit C, Addendum Acknowledgement Form", and must be included with the Vendor RFB response. Submittals Due: September 15, 2016 by 3:00 PM Page 6 of 12 P86 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Bids ("RFB") # 16/17-107 for Irrigation Parts & Supplies 2.5 PARTICIPATION CLAUSE It is hereby understood that other governmental entities, such as cities, counties, and special school districts may utilize this RFB response at their option for equipment or services at the RFB response price. Said entities shall have the option to participate in any award made as a result of this solicitation. Any such piggy -back awards will be made independently by each agency, and the City is not an agent, partner or representative of these agencies and is not obligated or liable for any action of debts that may arise out of such independently negotiated piggy -back procurement. Each public agency shall accept sole responsibility of its own order placement and payments to the Vendor. A signed "Exhibit D, Participation Clause", must be included with the Vendor RFB response. 2.6 SIGNATURE OF AUTHORITY Completion of this RFB form and its associated Exhibits are a requirement. Failure to do so may disqualify your RFB response submittal. Vendors must submit responses by the due date and time as specified herein. Vendors will be considered non-responsive if the above requirements are not submitted as requested. In the event that only one RFB response is received, the City reserves the right to return the RFB to the Vendor. An "Exhibit E, Signature of Authority", must be included with the Vendor RFB response. Submittals Due: September 15, 2016 by 3:00 PM Page 7 of 12 P87 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Bids ("RFB") # 16/17-107 for Irrigation Parts & Supplies "EXHIBIT A" CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CONFLICT OF INTEREST/NON-DISCLOSURE STATEMENT It is the policy of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to prevent personal or organizational conflict of interest, or the appearance of such conflict of interest, in the award and administration of City Contracts, including, but not limited to Contracts for Professional Services Agreements ("PSA") with potential Vendors. I do not have specific knowledge of confidential information in regards to RFB responses received in response to the Request for Bid (RFB) # 16/17-107 for Irrigation Parts & Supplies. I agree not to disclose or otherwise divulge any information pertaining to the contents, status, or ranking of any RFB response to anyone. I understand the terms and "disclose or otherwise divulge" to include, but are not limited to, verbal conversations, written correspondence, reproduction of any part or any portion of any RFB response, or removal of same from designated areas. I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the following statements are true and correct and that I understand and agree to be bound by commitments contained herein. (Print Name) (Relationship to the City) (Relationship to the Consultant) (Signature) (Date) Must be included in final RFB submittal. Submittals Due: September 15, 2016 by 3:00 PM Page 8 of 12 P88 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Bids ("RFB") # 16/17-107 for Irrigation Parts & Supplies "EXHIBIT B" SPECIFICATIONS WORKSHEET The City reserves the right, at its sole discretion, unless otherwise stated, to accept or reject all or any bids, or any part thereof, either separately or as a whole, or to waive any informality and to split or make the award in any manner determined by the City to be in the best interest of the City. IMPORTANT, PLEASE NOTE; Vendors must indicate compliance with specifications by check mark or initials in the "MEETS", "EXCEEDS", "NO" or "N/A". Indicating "MEETS" to a specification will mean full compliance; indicating "NO" will mean an exception is being taken. All exceptions must be fully explained on a separate page titled "EXCEPTIONS", giving reference to the page and specification where the exception is being taken. Failure to comply with this requirement will result in the proposal being rejected. SPECIFICATIONS MEETS EXCEEDS N/A NO COMMENTS Deliver to: City Yard, 9153 9th St., Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Vendor shall deliver 48 to 72 hours from date ordered. The City is only considering a three year Firm Fixed pricing solution for this solicitation. A Purchase Order will automatically be generated on an annual basis for the three year term and for the original quoted pricing. Price increases during the three year term will not be accepted and will result in competitive solicitation that the vendor issuing the price increase will be suspended from the next competitive solicitation round. The City reserves the right to make an award based on each line item pricing. Please ensure that you offer your best and lowest price possible for each line item as this RFB will be evaluated in a manner to establish an award to be in the best interest of the City. Must be included in final RFB submittal. Submittals Due: September 15, 2016 by 3:00 PM Page 9 of 12 P89 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Bids ("RFB") # 16/17-107 for Irrigation Parts & Supplies "EXHIBIT C" ADDENDUM ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The Vendor hereby acknowledges the following Addenda Number(s) to this RFB have been received, if any. Vendor understands failure to acknowledge any addenda issued may cause the RFB response to be considered non-responsive. It is the Vendor's responsibility to log into the Bid system to identify and download the number of addenda that have been posted. • • • • Signature Printed Name Title Date Must be included in final RFB submittal. Submittals Due: September 15, 2016 by 3:00 PM Page 10 of 12 P90 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Bids ("RFB") # 16/17-107 for Irrigation Parts & Supplies "EXHIBIT D" PARTICIPATION CLAUSE It is hereby understood that other government entities, such as cities, counties, and special/school districts may utilize this RFB response at their option for equipment or services at the RFB response price for a period of days. Said entities shall have the option to participate in any award made as a result of this solicitation. Any such piggy -back awards will be made independently by each agency, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga is not an agent, partner or representative of these agencies and is not obligated or liable for any action of debts that may arise out of such independently negotiated piggy -back procurement. Each public agency shall accept sole responsibility of its own order placement and payments of the Vendor. Successful Vendor will extend prices as proposed herein to other governmental agencies, please specify. YES NO Must be included in final RFB submittal. Submittals Due: September 15, 2016 by 3:00 PM Page 11 of 12 P91 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Bids ("RFB") # 16/17-107 for Irrigation Parts & Supplies "EXHIBIT E" SIGNATURE OF AUTHORITY The undersigned firm declares that he has carefully examined the specifications and read the above terms and conditions, and hereby proposes and agrees, if this RFB response is accepted, to furnish all material in accordance with the specifications and instructions, in the time and manner therein prescribed for the unit cost amounts set forth in the following RFB response. FAILURE TO DO SO MAY DEEM YOUR RFB RESPONSE AS NON- RESPONSIVE. Company Name: Address: (Street, Su. # City, State, Zip) Telephone #: Fax #: E-mail address: Web Address: Authorized Representative: (print) Title: Signature: Date: Must be included in final RFB submittal. Submittals Due: September 15, 2016 by 3:00 PM Page 12 of 12 P92 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: TO: FROM: INITIATED BY: SUBJECT: STAFF REPORT October 4, 2017 Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager William Wittkopf, Public Works Services Director Ty Quaintance, Facilities Superintendent Ruth Cain, CPPB, Procurement Manager CONSIDERATION TO EXTEND THE CONTRACT AGREEMENT WITH MEDLEY FIRE FOR CITYWIDE FIRE SUPPRESSION SERVICES (CO 14-239) AND APPROVE THE SPENDING LIMIT OF $41,900 ANNUALLY; NOT TO EXCEED $167,600 OVER A FOUR-YEAR PERIOD RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council approve Amendment No. 004 to contract CO 14-239 with Medley Fire for citywide fire suppression services in an amount of $41,900 per year, not to exceed $167,600, for the four-year contract period. BACKGROUND: On September 3, 2014, the Public Works Services Department initiated a contract service agreement with Medley Fire for citywide testing, repair, and preventive maintenance to water based fire protection systems, clean agent suppression systems, kitchen hood systems, and all fire extinguishers pursuant to RFB #14/15-002. The contract was awarded for a maximum of seven (7) years. Fiscal Year 17/18 is the fourth year of the contract. ANALYSIS: Medley Fire has submitted a letter of intent expressing their desire to continue providing service for the City of Rancho Cucamonga during FY 2017/2018. The Public Works Services Department is requesting the existing contract be renewed for the next four years, through June 30, 2021 which represents the remaining term of the contract as bid in RFB #14/15-002. Staff recommends City Council extend the contract with Medley Fire and approve a spending limit of $41,900 annually; not to exceed $167,600 for a maximum of four years. An additional $32,000 for fire suppression services at all Fire Stations will be considered separately by the Fire Board. FISCAL IMPACT: The FY 2017/2018 budget includes funding from City Facilities Maintenance account 1001312-5304, and Sports Complex Maintenance account 1700312-5304 for fire suppression services for all City facilities. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: None. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 - Contract CO 14-239 for "Fire Suppression Services" Attachment 2 - Amendment No. 1-4 to Contract CO 14-239 for "Fire Suppression Services" Page 1 of 1 • AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES P93 C -o 1 - 3 9 THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 03 day of September, 2014, by and between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation ("City") and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District ("RCFPD") and Medley Fire Protection Inc., a Commercial fire suppression service provider ("Contractor"). RECITALS A. City and RCFPD has heretofore issued its request for proposals to perform the following services: Perform all maintenance, testing, repair and preventative maintenance to water based fire protection systems, clean agent suppression systems, kitchen hood systems and all fire extinguishers through out the City and Fire District Facilties. Per the latest guidelines of California Code of Regulations, title 19 and all (NFPA) codes applicable to the referenced requirements. ("the Project"). B. Contractor has submitted a proposal to perform the services described in Recital "A", above, necessary to complete the Project. C. City and RCFPD desires to engage Contractor to complete the Project in the manner set forth and more fully described herein. D. Contractor represents that it is fully qualified and licensed under the laws of the State of California to perform the services contemplated by this Agreement in a good and professional manner. AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of performance by the parties of the mutual promises, covenants, and conditions herein contained, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Contractor's Services. 1.1 Scope and Level of Services. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement, City and RCFPD hereby engages Contractor to perform all services described in Recitals "A" and "B" above, including, but not limited to performing all maintenance to water based fire protection systems, clean agent suppression systems, kitchen hood systems and all fire extinguishers through out the City and Fire District Facilites. Per the latest guidelines of California Code of Regulations, title 19 and all (NFPA) codes applicable to the referenced requirements, all as more fully set forth in the Contractor's proposal, dated September 3, 2014 and entitled "Scope of Work", attached hereto as Exhibit "A", and incorporated by reference herein. The nature, scope, and level of the services required to be performed by Contractor are set forth in the Scope of Work and are referred to herein as "the Services." In the event of any PSA without professional liability insurance (contractor) Last Revised: 10/02/13 Vendor Initials Page i Attachment 1 P94 inconsistencies between the Scope of Work and this Agreement, the terms and provisions of this Agreement shall control. 1.2 Revisions to Scope of Work. Upon request of the City and RCFPD, the Contractor will promptly meet with City and RCFPD staff to discuss any revisions to the Project desired by the City and RCFPD. Contractor agrees that the Scope of Work may be amended based upon said meetings, and, by amendment to this Agreement, the parties may agree on a revision or revisions to Contractor's compensation based thereon. A revision pursuant to this Section that does not increase the total cost payable to Contractor by more than ten percent (10%) of the total compensation specified in Section 3, may be approved in writing by City's Manager without amendment. 1.3 Time for Performance. Contractor shall perform all services under this Agreement in a timely, regular basis consistent with industry standards for professional skill and care, and in accordance with any schedule of performance set forth in the Scope of Work, or as set forth in a "Schedule of Performance", if such Schedule is attached hereto as Exhibit "A". 1.4 Standard of Care. As a material inducement to City and RCFPD to enter into this Agreement, Contractor hereby represents that it has the experience necessary to undertake the services to be provided. In light of such status and experience, Contractor hereby covenants that it shall follow the customary professional standards in performing the Services. 1.5 Familiarity with Services. By executing this Agreement, Contractor represents that, to the extent required by the standard of practice, Contractor (a) has investigated and considered the scope of services to be performed, (b) has carefully considered how the services should be performed, and (c) understands the facilities, difficulties and restrictions attending performance of the services under this Agreement. Contractor represents that Contractor, to the extent required by the standard of practice, has investigated any areas of work, as applicable, and is reasonably acquainted with the conditions therein. Should Contractor discover any latent or unknown conditions, which will materially affect the performance of services, Contractor shall immediately inform City and RCFPD of such fact and shall not proceed except at Contractor's risk until written instructions are received from the City and RCFPD Representative. 2. Term of Agreement. The term of this Agreement shall be 7 year(s) and shall become effective as of the date of the mutual execution by way of both parties signature (the "Effective Date"). No work shall be conducted; service or goods will not be provided until this Agreement has been executed and requirements have been fulfil led. Parties to this Agreement shall have the option to renew in one (1) year increments to a total of 7 years, unless sooner terminated as provided in Section 14 herein. Options to renew are contingent upon the City Manager's approval, subject to pricing review, and in Vendor Initials PSA without professional liability insurance (contractor) Page 2 Last Revised: /0/02//3 P95 accordance to all Terms and Conditions stated herein unless otherwise provided in writing by the City and RCFPD. 3. Compensation. 3.1 Compensation. City and RCFPD shall compensate Contractor as set forth in Exhibit A, provided, however, that full, total and complete amount payable to Contractor shall not exceed $49,900 (forty nine thousand nine hundred), including all out of pocket expenses, unless additional compensation is approved by the City Manager or City Council. City and RCFPD shall not withhold any federal, state or other taxes, or other deductions. However, City and RCFPD shall withhold not more than ten percent (10%) of any invoice amount pending receipt of any deliverables reflected in such invoice. Under no circumstance shall Contractor be entitled to compensation for services not yet satisfactorily performed. The parties further agree that compensation may be adjusted in accordance with Section 1.2 to reflect subsequent changes to the Scope of Services. City and RCFPD shall compensate Contractor for any authorized extra services as set forth in Exhibit A. 4. Method of Payment. 4.1 Invoices. Contractor shall submit to City and RCFPD monthly invoices for the Services performed pursuant to this Agreement. The invoices shall describe in detail the Services rendered during the period and shall separately describe any authorized extra services. Any invoice claiming compensation for extra services shall include appropriate documentation of prior authorization of such services. All invoices shall be remitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. 4.2 City and RCFPD shall review such invoices and notify Contractor in writing within ten (10) business days of any disputed amounts. 4.3 City and RCFPD shall pay all undisputed portions of the invoice within thirty (30) calendar days after receipt of the invoice up to the not -to -exceed amounts set forth in Section 3. 4.4 All records, invoices, time cards, cost control sheets and other records maintained by Contractor relating to services hereunder shall be available for review and audit by the City and RCFPD. 5. Representatives. 5.1 City and RCFPD Representative. For the purposes of this Agreement, the contract administrator and City and RCFPD's representative shall be Mike Courtney- Jeff Geith, or such other person as designated in writing by the City and RCFPD ("City and RCFPD Representative"). It shall be Contractor's responsibility to assure that the City and RCFPD Representative is kept informed of the progress of the performance of the services, and Contractor shall refer any decisions that must be made by City and RCFPD to the City and RCFPD Representative. Unless otherwise specified Vendor Initials PSA without professional liability insurance (contractor) Page 3 Last Revised: 10/02/13 P96 herein, any approval of City and RCFPD required hereunder shall mean the approval of the City and RCFPD Representative. 5.2 Contractor Representative. For the purposes of this Agreement, Shelly Beach is hereby designated as the principal and representative of Contractor authorized to act in its behalf with respect to the services specified herein and make all decisions in connection therewith ("Contractor's Representative"). It is expressly understood that the experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of the Contractor's Representative were a substantial inducement for City and RCFPD to enter into this Agreement. Therefore, the Contractor's Representative shall be responsible during the term of this Agreement for directing all activities of Contractor and devoting sufficient time to personally supervise the services hereunder. Contractor may not change the Responsible Principal without the prior written approval of City and RCFPD. 6. Contractor's Personnel. 6.1 All Services shall Contractor's direct supervision, and all permits, and licenses required by State and without limitation, a City and RCFPD Municipal Code. be performed by Contractor or under personnel shall possess the qualifications, local law to perform such Services, including, business license as required by the City's 6.2 Contractor shall be solely responsible for the satisfactory work performance of all personnel engaged in performing the Services and compliance with the standard of care set forth in Section 1.4. 6.3 Contractor shall be responsible for payment of all employees' and subcontractors' wages and benefits, and shall comply with all requirements pertaining to employer's liability, workers' compensation, unemployment insurance, and Social Security. By its execution of this Agreement, Contractor certifies that it is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code that require every employer to be insured against liability for Worker's Compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and agrees to comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the Services. 6.4 Contractor shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless City and RCFPD and its elected officials, officers and employees, servants, designated volunteers, and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City and RCFPD officials, from any and all liability, damages, claims, costs and expenses of any nature to the extent arising from Contractor's violations of personnel practices and/or any violation of the California Labor Code. City and RCFPD shall have the right to offset against the amount of any fees due to Contractor under this Agreement any amount due to City and RCFPD from Contractor as a result of Contractor's failure to promptly pay to City and RCFPD any reimbursement or indemnification arising under this Section 6. 7. Ownership of Work Product. Vendor Initials PSA without professional liability insurance (contractor) Page 4 Last Revised: /0/02/13 P97 7.1 Ownership. All documents, ideas, concepts, electronic files, drawings, photographs and any and all other writings, including drafts thereof, prepared, created or provided by Contractor in the course of performing the Services, including any and all intellectual and proprietary rights arising from the creation of the same (collectively, "Work Product"), are considered to be "works made for hire" for the benefit of the City and RCFPD. Upon payment being made, and provided Contractor is not in breach of this Agreement, all Work Product shall be and remain the property of City and RCFPD without restriction or limitation upon its use or dissemination by City and RCFPD. Basic survey notes, sketches, charts, computations and similar data prepared or obtained by Contractor under this Agreement shall, upon request, be made available to City and RCFPD. None of the Work Product shall be the subject of any common law or statutory copyright or copyright application by Contractor. In the event of the return of any of the Work Product to Contractor or its representative, Contractor shall be responsible for its safe return to City and RCFPD. Under no circumstances shall Contractor fail to deliver any draft or final designs, plans, drawings, reports or specifications to City and RCFPD upon written demand by City and RCFPD for their delivery, notwithstanding any disputes between Contractor and City and RCFPD concerning payment, performance of the contract, or otherwise. This covenant shall survive the termination of this Agreement. City and RCFPD's reuse of the Work Product for any purpose other than the Project, shall be at City and RCFPD's sole risk. 7.2. Assignment of Intellectual Property Interests: Upon execution of this Agreement and to the extent not otherwise conveyed to City and RCFPD by Section 7.1, above, the Contractor shall be deemed to grant and assign to City and RCFPD, and shall require all of its subcontractors to assign to City and RCFPD, all ownership rights, and all common law and statutory copyrights, trademarks, and other intellectual and proprietary property rights relating to the Work Product and the Project itself, and Contractor shall disclaim and retain no rights whatsoever as to any of the Work Product, to the maximum extent permitted by law. City and RCFPD shall be entitled to utilize the Work Product for any and all purposes, including but not limited to constructing, using, maintaining, altering, adding to, restoring, rebuilding and publicizing the Project or any aspect of the Project. 7.3 Title to Intellectual Property. Contractor warrants and represents that it has secured all necessary licenses, consents or approvals to use any instrumentality, thing or component as to which any intellectual property right exists, including computer software, used in the rendering of the Services and the production of the Work Product and/or materials produced under this Agreement, and that City and RCFPD has full legal title to and the right to reproduce any of the Work Product. Contractor shall defend, indemnify and hold City and RCFPD, and its elected officials, officers, employees, servants, attorneys, designated volunteers, and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City and RCFPD officials, harmless from any loss, claim or liability in any way related to a claim that City and RCFPD's use is violating federal, state or local laws, or any contractual provisions, relating to trade names, licenses, franchises, patents or other means of protecting intellectual property rights and/or interests in products or inventions. Contractor shall bear all costs arising from the use of patented, copyrighted, trade secret or trademarked documents, materials, software, Vendor Initials PSA without professional liability insurance (contractor) Page 5 Last Revised: 10/02/13 P98 in California Government Code §§1090 and 87100) in any decision made by City and RCFPD on any matter in connection with which Contractor has been retained. 10.2 Contractor further represents that it has not employed or retained any person or entity, other than a bona fide employee working exclusively for Contractor, to solicit or obtain this Agreement. Contractor has not paid or agreed to pay any person or entity, other than a bona fide employee working exclusively for Contractor, any fee, commission, gift, percentage, or any other consideration contingent upon the execution of this Agreement. Upon any breach or violation of this warranty, City and RCFPD shall have the right, at its sole and absolute discretion, to terminate this Agreement without further liability, or to deduct from any sums payable to Contractor hereunder the full amount or value of any such fee, commission, percentage or gift. 10.3 Contractor has no knowledge that any officer or employee of City and RCFPD has any interest, whether contractual, noncontractual, financial, proprietary, or otherwise, in this transaction or in the business of Contractor, and that if any such interest comes to the knowledge of Contractor at any time during the term of this Agreement, Contractor shall immediately make a complete, written disclosure of such interest to City and RCFPD, even if such interest would not be deemed a prohibited "conflict of interest" under applicable laws as described in subsection 10.1. 11. Indemnification. 11.1 To the maximum extent permitted by law, the Contractor shall defend, indemnify and hold the City and RCFPD, and its elected officials, officers, employees, servants, volunteers, and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials and RCFPD, (collectively, "Indemnitees"),free and harmless with respect to any and all damages, liabilities, losses, reasonable defense costs or expenses (collectively, "Claims"), including but not limited to Claims relating to death or injury to any person and injury to any property, which arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the acts, omissions, activities or operations of Contractor or any of its officers, employees, subcontractors, Contractors, or agents in the performance of this Agreement. Contractor shall defend Indemnitees in any action or actions filed in connection with any such Claims with counsel of City and RCFPD's choice, and shall pay all costs and expenses, including actual attorney's fees and experts' costs incurred in connection with such defense. The indemnification obligation herein shall not in any way be limited by the insurance obligations contained in this Agreement provided, however, that the Contractor shall have no obligation to indemnify for Claims arising out of the sole negligence or willful misconduct of any of the Indemnitees. 11.2 Nonwaiver of Rights. Indemnitees do not, and shall not, waive any rights that they may possess against Contractor because of the acceptance by City and RCFPD, or the deposit with City and RCFPD, of any insurance policy or certificate required pursuant to this Agreement. 11.3 Waiver of Right of Subrogation. Except as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement, Contractor, on behalf of itself and all parties claiming under Vendor Initials PSA without professional liability insurance (contractor) Page 7 Last Revised: 10/02/13 or through it, hereby waives all rights of subrogation against the Indemnitees, while acting within the scope of their duties, from all claims, losses and liabilities arising out of or incident to activities or operations performed by or on behalf of the Contractor. 11.4 Survival. The provisions of this Section 11 shall survive the termination of the Agreement and are in addition to any other rights or remedies which Indemnitees may have under the law. Payment is not required as a condition precedent to an Indemnitee's right to recover under this indemnity provision, and an entry of judgment against Contractor shall be conclusive in favor of the Indemnitee's right to recover under this indemnity provision. 12. Insurance. 12.1 Liability Insurance. Contractor shall procure and maintain in full force and effect for the duration of this Agreement, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the services hereunder by Contractor, and/or its agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors. 12.2 Minimum Scope of Insurance. Unless otherwise approved by City and RCFPD, coverage shall be at least as broad as: (1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage (occurrence form CG 0001). (2) Insurance Services Office form number CA 0001 (Ed. 1/87) covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto). Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of California, and Employer's Liability Insurance. 12.3 Minimum Limits of Insurance. Contractor shall maintain limits no less than: (3) (1) Commercial General Liability: $2,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this Agreement or the general limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. (2) Automobile Liability: $2,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage. (3) Employer's Liability: $1,000,000 per accident and in the aggregate for bodily injury or disease and Workers' Compensation Insurance in the amount required by law. P84 without professional liability insurance (contractor) Last Revised: 10/02/13 Vendor Initials Page 8 P99 P100 (4) The Insurance obligations under this Agreement shall be the greater of (i) the Insurance coverages and limits carried by the Contractor; or (ii) the minimum Insurance coverages and limits shown in this Agreement. Any insurance proceeds in excess of the specified limits and coverage required which are applicable to a given loss, shall be available to the City and RCFPD. No representation is made that the minimum Insurance requirements of this Agreement are sufficient to cover the obligations of the Contractor under this agreement. 12.4 Deductibles and Self -Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self- insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City and RCFPD and shall not reduce the limits of coverage. City and RCFPD reserves the right to obtain a full certified copy of any required insurance policy and endorsements. 12.5 Other Insurance Provisions. (1) The commercial general liability and automobile liability policies are to contain the following provisions on a separate additionally insured endorsement naming the City , RCFPD, its officers, officials, employees, designated volunteers and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City and RCFPD officials, as additional insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of Contractor; products and completed operations of Contractor; premises owned, occupied or used by Contractor; and/or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by Contractor. The coverage shall contain no limitations on the scope of protection afforded to City, RCFPD, its officers, officials, employees, designated volunteers or agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City and RCFPD officials which are not also limitations applicable to the named insured. (2) For any claims related to this Agreement, Contractor's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects City, RCFPD, its officers, officials, employees, designated volunteers and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City and RCFPD officials. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by City , RCFPD, its officers, officials, employees, designated volunteers or agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City and RCFPD officials shall be in excess of Contractor's insurance and shall not contribute with it. Vendor Initials PSA without professional liability insurance (contractor) Page 9 Last Revised: 10/02/13 P101 (3) Contractor's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. (4) Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be canceled except after 30 days prior written notice by first class mail has been given to City and RCFPD (ten (10) days prior written notice for non-payment of premium). Contractor shall provide thirty (30) days written notice to City and RCFPD prior to implementation of a reduction of limits or material change of insurance coverage as specified herein. (5) Each insurance policy required by this clause shall expressly waive the insurer's right of subrogation against City and RCFPD, its elected officials, officers, employees, servants, attorneys, designated volunteers, and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City and RCFPD officials. (6) Each policy shall be issued by an insurance company approved in writing by City and RCFPD, which is admitted and licensed to do business in the State of California and which is rated A:VII or better according to the most recent A.M. Best Co. Rating Guide. (7) Each policy shall specify that any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the required policy, including breaches of warranty, shall not affect the coverage required to be provided. (8) Each policy shall specify that any and all costs of adjusting and/or defending any claim against any insured, including court costs and attorneys' fees, shall be paid in addition to and shall not deplete any policy limits. (9) Contractor shall provide any and all other insurance, endorsements, or exclusions as required by the City and RCFPD in any request for proposals applicable to this Agreement. 12.6 Evidence of coverage. Prior to commencing performance under this Agreement, the Contractor shall furnish the City and RCFPD with certificates and original endorsements, or copies of each required policy, effecting and evidencing the insurance coverage required by this Agreement including (1) Additional Insured Endorsement(s), (2) Worker's Compensation waiver of subrogation endorsement, and (3) General liability declarations or endorsement page listing all policy endorsements. The endorsements shall be signed by a person authorized by the insurer(s) to bind coverage on Vendor Initials PSA without professional liability insurance (contractor) Page 10 Last Revised: 10/02/13 P102 its behalf. All endorsements or policies shall be received and approved by the City and RCFPD before Contractor commences performance. If perfonnance of this Agreement shall extend beyond one year, Contractor shall provide City and RCFPD with the required policies or endorsements evidencing renewal of the required policies of insurance prior to the expiration of any required policies of insurance. 12.7 Contractor agrees to include in all contracts with all subcontractors performing work pursuant to this Agreement, the same requirements and provisions of this Agreement including the indemnity and insurance requirements to the extent they apply to the scope of any such subcontractor's work. Contractor shall require its subcontractors to be bound to Contractor and City and RCFPD in the same manner and to the same extent as Contractor is bound to City and RCFPD pursuant to this Agreement, and to require each of its subcontractors to include these same provisions in its contract with any sub -subcontractor. 13. Cooperation. In the event any claim or action is brought against City and RCFPD relating to Contractor's performance or services rendered under this Agreement, Contractor shall render any reasonable assistance and cooperation that City and RCFPD might require. City and RCFPD shall compensate Contractor for any litigation support services in an amount to be agreed upon by the parties. 14. Termination. City and RCFPD shall have the right to terminate this Agreement at any time for any or no reason on not less than ten (10) days prior written notice to Contractor. In the event City and RCFPD exercises its right to terminate this Agreement, City and RCFPD shall pay Contractor for any services satisfactorily rendered prior to the effective date of the termination, provided Contractor is not then in breach of this Agreement. Contractor shall have no other claim against City and RCFPD by reason of such termination, including any claim for compensation. City and RCFPD may terminate for cause following a default remaining uncured more than five (5) business days after service of a notice to cure on the breaching party. Contractor may terminate this Agreement for cause upon giving the City and RCFPD ten (10) business days prior written notice for any of the following: (1) uncured breach by the City and RCFPD of any material term of this Agreement, including but not limited to Payment Terms; (2) material changes in the conditions under which this Agreement was entered into, coupled with the failure of the parties to reach accord on the fees and charges for any Additional Services required because of such changes. 15. Notices. Any notices, bills, invoices, or reports authorized or required by this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed received on (a) the day of delivery if delivered by hand or overnight courier service during Contractor's and City and RCFPD's regular business hours; or (b) on the third business day following deposit in the United States mail, postage prepaid, to the addresses set forth in this Section, or to such other addresses as the parties may, from time to time, designate in writing pursuant to the provisions of this Section. All notices shall be addressed as follows: Vendor Initials PSA without professional liability insurance (contractor) Page 11 Last Revised: /0/02/13 P103 If to City and RCFPD: Michael Courtney, RCFD Facilty Supervisor 9153 9th Street Rancho Cucamonga CA, 91730 If to Contractor: Shelly Beach, Representative 10700 Jersey Blvd #380 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 16. Non -Discrimination and Equal Employment Opportunity. In the performance of this Agreement, Contractor shall not discriminate against any employee, subcontractor, or applicant for employment because of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin, ancestry, age, physical or mental handicap, medical condition, or sexual orientation. Contractor will take affirmative action to ensure that subcontractors and applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment, without regard to their race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin, ancestry, age, physical or mental handicap, medical condition, or sexual orientation. 17. Assignment and Subcontracting. Contractor shall not assign or transfer any interest in this Agreement or subcontract the performance of any of Contractor's obligations hereunder without City and RCFPD's prior written consent. Except as provided herein, any attempt by Contractor to so assign, transfer, or subcontract any rights, duties, or obligations arising hereunder shall be null, void and of no effect. 18. Compliance with Laws. Contractor shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, ordinances, codes and regulations in force at the time Contractor performs the Services. Contractor is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Section 1720, et seq., and 1770, et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000, et seq., ("Prevailing Wage Laws"), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and compliance with other requirements on "public works" and "maintenance" projects. If the Services are being performed as part of an applicable "public works" or "maintenance" project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, and if the total compensation is $1,000 or more, Contractor agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws. The applicable prevailing wage rate determinations can be found at http://www.dir.ca.gov/dlsr/DPreWageDetennination.htm Contractor shall make copies of the prevailing rates of per diem wages for each craft, classification or type of worker needed to execute the Services, available to interested parties upon request, and shall post copies at the Contractor's principal place of business and at the Project site. Contractor shall defend, indemnify and hold the City and RCFPD, its elected officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claim or Vendor Initials PSA without professional liability insurance (contractor) Page 12 Last Revised: /0/02/13 liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws. 19. Non -Waiver of Terms, Rights and Remedies. Waiver by either party of any one or more of the conditions of performance under this Agreement shall not be a waiver of any other condition of performance under this Agreement. In no event shall the making by City and RCFPD of any payment to Contractor constitute or be construed as a waiver by City and RCFPD of any breach of covenant, or any default which may then exist on the part of Contractor, and the making of any such payment by City and RCFPD shall in no way impair or prejudice any right or remedy available to City and RCFPD with regard to such breach or default. 20. Attorney's Fees. In the event that either party to this Agreement shall commence any legal action or proceeding to enforce or interpret the provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party in such action or proceeding shall be entitled to recover its costs of suit, including reasonable attorney's fees and costs of experts. 21. Exhibits; Precedence. All documents referenced as exhibits in this Agreement are hereby incorporated in this Agreement. In the event of any material discrepancy between the express provisions of this Agreement and the provisions of any document incorporated herein by reference, the provisions of this Agreement shall prevail. 22. Applicable Law and Venue. The validity, interpretation, and performance of this Agreement shall be controlled by and construed under the laws of the State of California. Venue for any action relating to this Agreement shall be in the San Bernardino County Superior Court. 23. Construction. In the event of any asserted ambiguity in, or dispute regarding the interpretation of any matter herein, the interpretation of this Agreement shall not be resolved by any rules of interpretation providing for interpretation against the party who causes the uncertainty to exist or against the party who drafted the Agreement or who drafted that portion of the Agreement. 24. Entire Agreement. This Agreement consists of this document, and any other documents, attachments and/or exhibits referenced herein and attached hereto, each of which is incorporated herein by such reference, and the same represents the entire and integrated agreement between Contractor and City and RCFPD. This Agreement supersedes all prior oral or written negotiations, representations or agreements. This Agreement may not be amended, nor any provision or breach hereof waived, except in a writing signed by the parties which expressly refers to this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties, through their respective authorized representatives, have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above. Contractor Name: Medley Fire Protection Inc. B Vendor Initials PSA without professional liability insurance (contractor) Page 13 Last Remised: 10/02/13 P1O4 P105 Name Title Date\�\, By: l_..n Name Anot,,lOf '1.2 Name Date Di,PJe_ Title City of Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District By: vy l ------ Name Title Title (two signatures required if corporation) EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF SERVICES Exhibit A: Scope of Services incorporated within Agreement /0 " 7/— /`/ Date Vendor Initials PSA without professional liability insurance (contractor) Page 14 Last Revised: 10/02/13 EXHIBIT B SCHEDULE FOR PERFORMANCE Exhibit B: Schedule for Performance incorporated within Agreement PSA without professional liability insurance (contractor) Last Revised: 10/02/13 Vendor Initials Page 15 P106 PSA without professional liability insurance (contractor) Last Revised: 10/02/13 Vendor Initials Page 16 P107 a 11a11 V111. t l 1JLL1111J1V TV [.L1 V VL l!1 Ut.ILIll GCLLtV11 (Sample Only — Not all forms will look identical to this Sample) TRAVELERSJ POLICY NUMBER. WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS LIABILITY POLICY ENDORSEMENT WC CO 03 13 (00)-01 WAIVER OF OUR RIGHT TO RECOVER FROM OTHERS ENDORSEMENT We have the right to recover our payments from anyone liable for an Injury covered by this policy. We will not enforce our right against the person or organization named in the Schedule. (This agreement applies only to the extent that you perform work under a written contract that requires you to obtain this agreement from us.) This agreement shall not operate directly or indirectly to benefit any one not named In the Schedule. SCHEDULE DESIGNATED PERSON: The City of Rancho Cucamonga, its officers, officials, employees, designated volunteers and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City or officials. DESIGNATED ORGANIZATION: PSA without professionl liability insurance (contractor) Last Revised: 10/02/13 Vendor Initials Page 17 P108 ti«aCHIllenL is — 3ampie Haainonai insures ror un -going rrojects P109 POLICY NUMBER: COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CG 20 10 07 04 THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. ADDITIONAL INSURED — OWNERS, LESSEES OR CONTRACTORS — SCHEDULED PERSON OR ORGANIZATION This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following: COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART SCHEDULE Name Of Additional Insured Person(s) Or Organization(s): Location(s) Of Covered Operations The City of Rancho Cucamonga, its officers, officials, employees, designated volunteers and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City or officials. Information required to complete this Schedule, if not shown above, will be shown in the Declarations. A. Section II — Who Is An Insured Is amended to include as an additional Insured the person(s) or organization(s) shown in the Schedule, but only with respect to liability for "bodily Injury", "property damage" or "personal and advertising Injury" caused, In whole or In part, by: 1. Your acts or omissions; or 2. The acts or omissions of those acting on your behalf; In the performance of your ongoing operations for the additional insured(s) at the location(s) desig- nated above. CG 20 10 07 04 B. With respect to the Insurance afforded to these additional insureds, the following additional exclu- sions apply: This insurance does not apply to "bodily injury" or "property damage" occurring after: 1. All work, including materials, parts or equip- ment fumished in connection with such work, on the project (other than service, maintenance or repairs) to be performed by or on behalf of the additional insured(s) at the location of the covered operations has been completed; or 2. That portion of "your work" out of which the injury or damage arises has been put to its In- tended use by any person or organization other than another contractor or subcontractor en- gaged in performing operations for a principal as a part of the same project. t ISO Properties, Inc., 2004 Page 1 of 1 0 Vendor Initials PSA without professional liability insurance (contractor) Page 18 Last Revised: /0/02/13 MEDLE-2 P110 OP ID: VCOS '-A�� L' CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE DATE(MM/DD/YYYY) 09/29/2014 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the pollcy(fes) must be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder In lieu of such endorsement(s). . PRODUCER Orr and Associates ins. Serv. CA License #0E63493 28780 Single Oak Drive #255 Temecula, CA 92590 CONTACT PHONE (A/C. No, Eirt1:951-506-5859 (ac, NO 951-506-9299 E-MAIL ADDRESS: INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC 4 INSURER A: LANDMARK AMERICAN INS. CO. Ak 33138 INSURED Medley Fire Protection, Ince{,(, � PO Box 8334 }� Alta Loma, CA 91701 o 1�' 0 I INSURER a :INTEGON NATIONAL INS CO 14'� LHA137560 INSURER C : GREAT AMERICAN INS CO A -A' 16691 INSURER D : WESCO INSURANCE CO fk S 1,000,000 INSURER E : I ' CLAIMS -MADE INSURER F : OCCUR - lAcvrarvry Ilumocrc: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. INSR LTR TYPE OF INSURANCE ADDL ,(NSD SUBR WVD POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFF (MMIDD/YYYY) POLICY EXP (MM/DDlYYW) LIMITS A X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY X X LHA137560 04/25/2014 04/25/2015 EACH OCCURRENCE S 1,000,000 CLAIMS -MADE X OCCUR DAMAGES(Eao IED PREMISES (Ea occurrence) $ 50,000 MED EXP (Any one person) S 0 PERSONAL &ADV INJURY S 1,000,000 GE 'L AGGREGATE POLICY OTHER: LIMIT APPLIES PER: X mi. GENERAL AGGREGATE S 2,000,000 PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG S 2,000,000 S AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY ANY AUTO ALL OWNED AUTOS AUTOS X _ SCHEDULED AUTOS NON -OWNED AUTOS X X 12001416 05/16/2014 05/16/2015 CO BINdEDtj INGLE LIMIT (EaB $ 1,000,000 BODILY INJURY (Per person) S BODILY INJURY (Per accident) S PETY DAMAGEHIRED accident) S(er $ C X UMBRELLA LIAB EXCESS LIAB X OCCUR CLAIMS -MADE XS3304897-FOLLOWS GL&AUTO 04/25/2014 04/25/2015 EACH OCCURRENCE S 2,000,000 AGGREGATE S 2,000,000 DED RETENTIONS S D WORKERS COMPENSATION_ AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE Y/N OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? (Mandatary In NH) If yes, describe under DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below N 1 A X WWC3087910 04/01/2014 04/01/2015 X STATUTE ERH E.L EACH ACCIDENT S 1,000,000 E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE S 1,000,000 E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT S 1,000,000 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS l LOCATIONS l VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached If more space Is required) City of Rancho Cucamonga, Rancho Cucamonga Fire District, its elected officials, officers, employees, servants, attorneys, designated volunteers, and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials are named as additional insured. Excess follows General Liability and Auto. CANCELLATION CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, A 91730 SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE 01A, aeijetAr-o-ruz ACORD 25 (2014/01) © 1988-2014 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD POLICY NUMBER: LHA137560 COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CG 20 10 0413 THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. ADDITIONAL INSURED - OWNERS, LESSEES OR CONTRACTORS - SCHEDULED PERSON OR ORGANIZATION This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following: COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART SCHEDULE Name Of Additional Insured Person(s) Or Organization(s) Location(s) Of Covered Operations City of Rancho Cucamonga, Rancho Cucamonga Fire District, its elected officials, officers, employees, servants, attorneys, designated volunteers, and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials Information required to complete this Schedule, if not shown above, will be shown in the Declarations. A. Section II — Who Is An Insured is amended to include as an additional insured the person(s) or organization(s) shown in the Schedule, but only with respect to liability for "bodily injury", "property damage" or "personal and advertising injury" caused, in whole or in part, by: 1. Your acts or omissions; or 2. The acts or omissions of those acting on your behalf; in the performance of your ongoing operations for the additional insured(s) at the location(s) designated above. However: 1. The insurance afforded to such additional insured only applies to the extent permitted by law; and 2. If coverage provided to the additional insured is required by a contract or agreement, the insurance afforded to such additional insured will not be broader than that which you are required by the contract or agreement to provide for such additional insured. CG 20 10 0413 B. With respect to the insurance afforded to these additional insureds, the following additional exclusions apply: This insurance does not apply to "bodily injury" or "property damage" occurring after: 1. All work, including materials, parts or equipment furnished in connection with such work, on the project (other than service, maintenance or repairs) to be performed by or on behalf of the additional insured(s) at the location of the covered operations has been completed; or 2. That portion of "your work" out of which the injury or damage arises has been put to its intended use by any person or organization other than another contractor or subcontractor engaged in performing operations for a principal as a part of the same project. 0 Insurance Services Office, Inc., 2012 Page 1 of 2 P111 C. With respect to the insurance afforded to these additional insureds, the following is added to Section III — Limits Of Insurance: If coverage provided to the additional insured is required by a contract or agreement, the most we will pay on behalf of the additional insured is the amount of insurance: 1. Required by the contract or agreement; or Page 2 of 2 2. Available under the applicable Limits of Insurance shown in the Declarations; whichever is less. This endorsement shall not increase the applicable Limits of Insurance shown in the Declarations. © Insurance Services Office, Inc., 2012 CG 20 10 0413 P112 P113 LANDMARK AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY This Endorsement Changes The Policy. Please Read It Carefully. WAIVER OF TRANSFER OF RIGHTS OF RECOVERY AGAINST OTHERS TO US This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following: COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE FORM PRODUCTS/COMPLETED OPERATIONS LIABILITY COVERAGE FORM SCHEDULE Name of Person or Organization: City of Rancho Cucamonga, Rancho Cucamonga Fire District, its elected officials, officers, employees, servants, attorneys, designated volunteers, and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials. The following is added to SECTION IV — CONDITIONS, 8. TRANSFER OF RIGHTS OF RECOVERY AGAINST OTHERS TO US: We waive any right of recovery we may have against the person or organization shown in the SCHEDULE above because of payment we make for injury or damage arising out of your ongoing operations, "your product" or "your work" done under a written contract with that person or organization and included in the "product -completed operations hazard". This waiver applies only to the person or organization shown in the SCHEDULE above. This endorsement effective 09/24/2014 forms part of Policy Number LHA137560 issued to MEDLEY FIRE PROTECTION, INC. by Landmark American Insurance Company RSG 14048 1008 Includes copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office, Inc. 1992 with its permission. P114 POLICY NUMBER: 12001416 COMMERCIAL AUTO CA 20 48 02 99 THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. DESIGNATED INSURED This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following: BUSINESS AUTO COVERAGE FORM GARAGE COVERAGE FORM MOTOR CARRIER COVERAGE FORM TRUCKERS COVERAGE FORM With respect to coverage provided by this endorsement, the provisions of the Coverage Form apply unless modified by this endorsement. This endorsement identifies person(s) or organization(s) who are "insureds" under the Who Is An Insured Provision of the Coverage Form. This endorsement does not alter coverage provided in the Coverage Form. This endorsement changes the policy effective on the inception date of the policy unless another date is indicated below. Endorsement Effective: 09/29/2014 Countersigned By: % (Authorized Representative) Named Insured: Medley Fire Protection, Inc. SCHEDULE Name of Person(s) or Organization(s): City of Rancho Cucamonga, Rancho Cucamonga Fire District, its officials, officers, employees, servants, attorneys, designated volunteers, and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of city officials 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 All projects for this additional insured during this policy term (If no entry appears above, information required to complete this endorsement will be shown in the Declarations as applicable to the endorsement.) Each person or organization shown in the Schedule is an "insured" for Liability Coverage, but only to the extent that person or organization qualifies as an "insured" under the Who Is An Insured Provision contained in Section II of the Coverage Form. CA 20 48 02 99 Copyright, Insurance Services Office, Inc., 1998 Page 1 of 1 POLICY NUMBER: COMMERCIAL AUTO 12001416 CA 04 44 03 10 THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. WAIVER OF TRANSFER OF RIGHTS OF RECOVERY AGAINST OTHERS TO US (WAIVER OF SUBROGATION) This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following: BUSINESS AUTO COVERAGE FORM BUSINESS AUTO PHYSICAL DAMAGE COVERAGE FORM GARAGE COVERAGE FORM MOTOR CARRIER COVERAGE FORM TRUCKERS COVERAGE FORM With respect to coverage provided by this endorsement, the provisions of the Coverage Form apply unless modi- fied by the endorsement. This endorsement changes the policy effective on the inception date of the policy unless another date is indicated below. Named Insured: Medley Fire Protection, Inc. Endorsement Effective Date: 09/29/2014 SCHEDULE Name(s) Of Person(s) Or Organization(s) City of Rancho Cucamonga, Rancho Cucamonga Fire District, its officials, officers, employees, servants, attorneys, designated volunteers, and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of city officials Information required to complete this Schedule, if not shown above, will be shown in the Declarations. The Transfer Of Rights Of Recovery Against Others To Us Condition does not apply to the person(s) or organization(s) shown in the Schedule, but only to the extent that subrogation is waived prior to the "accident" or the 'loss" under a contract with that person or organization. CA 04 44 03 10 © Insurance Services Office, Inc., 2009 Page 1 of 1 P115 4 P116 WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS LIABILITY INSURANCE POLICY WC 04 03 06 (Ed. 4-84) WAIVER OF OUR RIGHT TO RECOVER FROM OTHERS ENDORSEMENT—CALIFORNIA We have the right to recover our payments from anyone liable for an injury covered by this policy. We will not enforce our right against the person or organization named in the Schedule. (This agreement applies only to the extent that you perform work under a written contract that requires you to obtain this agreement from us.) You must maintain payroll records accurately segregating the remuneration of your employees while engaged in the work described in the Schedule. The additional premium for this endorsement shall be 0% of the California workers' compensation premium otherwise due on such remuneration. Schedule Person or Organization Job Description City of Rancho Cucamonga All CA Operations Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 This endorsement changes the policy to which it is attached and is effective on the date issued unless otherwise stated. Endorsement Effective 4/1/2014 Policy No. WWC3087910 Endorsement No. WC040306 Insured Medley Fire Protection, Inc. (Corporation) Premium $ 4031 Insurance Company Wesco Insurance Company Countersigned by P117 AMENDMENT NO. 001 to Professional Services Agreement (CO #14-239) between Medley Fire Protection Inc. (hereinafter "Contractor") and City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter the "City") This Amendment No. 001 will serve to amend the Professional Services Agreement (hereinafter "Agreement"), CO# 14-239, to incorporate the following: The above mentioned PSA has been in effect for one (1) years and has an option to renew in one (I) year increments to a total of seven (7) years. Contractor and City would like to exercise the option to renew CO#14-239 for one (1) additional year (FY 15-16) extending the Agreement date to June 30, 2016. Said extension will be in accordance with the Contractor's Letter of Intent attached hereto. This will be the second year of the Agreement. All other Terms and Conditions of the original Agreement CO#14-239, will remain in full effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties, through their respective authorized representatives, have executed this Amendment by way of signature by both parties and on the date indicated below. Please return two (2) original signed copies to the City no later than March 30, 2015. The City will process both copies for signature and provide Medley Fire Protection Inc. with one (1) fully executed copy of the Amendment. Medley Fire Protection Inc. City of R ncho Cucamoi ga By: Name Date 1�iRt r le Title By: Name Date Title By: Nam Title Date (two signatures required if corporation) Last Revised: 09/28/2012 Attachment 2 Page 1 of 1 P118 9ktedtey Fire protection Inc. Fire Alarm /Fire Sprinkler /Fire Extinguisher/ Emergency Lighting /Restaurant / Industrial & Clean Agent Fire Suppression Systems Letter of Intent Renew. March 11, 2015 City Of Rancho Cucamonga Purchasing Department 10500 Civic Center Dr Rancho Cucamonga CA 91730 Attn: Inge Tunggaldjaja, At this time Medley Fire Protection would like to renew for the 2015/16 year for our Fire Alarm and Water Based Fire, Protection System Maintenance, Testing, Repair and Preventative Maintenance Services per specification and RFP terms and conditions. No price increase for the contract period July 1, 2015- June 30, 2016. Thank you, S1tie,LLy 13ea44, Shelly Beach President Medley Fire Protection, Inc. P. 0. Box 8334 Alta Loma, CA 91701 * License 11706851 C-16 (877) 463-3539 / (909) 581-0915 / FAX (909) 354-3168 P119 AMENDMENT NO. 002 to Professional Services Agreement (CO #14-239) between Medley Fire Protection Inc. (hereinafter "Contractor") and City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter the "City") This Amendment No. 002 will serve to amend the Professional Services Agreement (hereinafter "Agreement"), CO# 14-239, to incorporate the following: The above mentioned PSA has been in effect for two (2) years and has an option to renew in one (1) year increments to a total of seven (7) years. Contractor and City would like to exercise the option to renew CO#14-239 for one (1) additional year (FY 16-17) extending the Agreement date to June 30, 2017. Said extension will be in accordance with the Contractor's Letter of Intent attached hereto. This will be the third year of the Agreement. All other Ternis and Conditions of the original Agreement CO#14-239, will remain in full effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties, through their respective authorized representatives, have executed this Amendment by way of signature by both parties and on the date indicated below. Please return two (2) original signed copies to the City no later than May 17, 2016. The City will process both copies for signature and provide Medley Fire Protection Inc. with one (1) fully executed copy of the Amendment. Medley Fire Protection Inc. B Title By:C\ tl o Name S-`C�-1Lp Date Title (two signatures required if corporation) City of ncho Cucamonga By: 5 -Z(e -t Name Date Title By: Name Date Title Last Revised: 09/28/2012 Page 1 of 1 9vtedTey Fire Protection Inc. Fire Alarm / Fire Sprinkler / Fire Extinguisher/ Emergency Lighting / Restaurant / Industrial & Clean Agent Fire Suppression Systems Letter of Intent Renew. May 3, 2016 City Of Rancho Cucamonga Purchasing Department 10500 Civic Center Dr Rancho Cucamonga CA 91730 Attn: Inge Tunggaldjaja, P120 At this time Medley Fire Protection would like to renew for the 2016/17 year for our Fire Alarm and Water Based Fire, Protection System Maintenance, Testing, Repair and Preventative Maintenance Services per specification and RFP terms and conditions. No price increase for the contract period July 1, 2016- June 30, 2017. Thank you, Sk ,14 13ear.4v Shelly Beach President Medley Fire Protection, Inc. P. 0. Box 8334 Alta Loma, CA 91701 * License #706851 C-16 (877) 463-3539 / (909) 581-0915 / FAX (909) 354-3268 P121 AMENDMENT NO. 003 to Professional Services Agreement (CO #14-239) between Medley Fire Protection Inc. (hereinafter "Contractor") and City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter the "City") This Amendment No. 003 will serve to amend the Professional Services Agreement (hereinafter "Agreement"), CO# 14-239, to incorporate the following: The above mentioned PSA has been in effect for three (3) years and has an option to renew in one (1) year increments to a total of seven (7) years. Contractor and City would like to exercise the option to renew CO#14-239 for one (1) additional year (FY 17-18) extending the Agreement date to June 30, 2018. Said extension will be in accordance with the Contractor's Letter of Intent attached hereto. This will be the forth year of the Agreement. All other Terms and Conditions of the original Agreement CO#14-239, will remain in full effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties, through their respective authorized representatives, have executed this Amendment by way of signature by both parties and on the date indicated below. Please return two (2) original signed copies to the City no later than June 22, 2017. The City will process both copies for signature and provide Medley Fire Protection Inc. with one (1) fully executed copy of the Amendment. Medley Fire Protection Inc. Title By: Lls(7-�% "f! G-/9 /7 Name ✓ Date v, Title (two signatures required if corporation) City of ' : cho ucam;.nga By: Name Title -7/f 2 / 7 ate By:�,.r--- Name 7--fs"^/1 Date Title Last Revised: 09/28/2012 Page 1 of 1 9vtedTey Fire protection Inc. Fire Alarm / Fire Sprinkler / Fire Extinguisher/ Emergency Lighting / Restaurant / Industrial & Clean Agent Fire Suppression Systems Letter of Intent Renew. June 13, 2017 City Of Rancho Cucamonga Purchasing Department 10500 Civic Center Dr Rancho Cucamonga CA 91730 Attn: Inge Tunggaldjaja, P122 At this time Medley Fire Protection would like to renew for the 2017/18 year for our Fire Alarm and Water Based Fire, Protection System Maintenance, Testing, Repair and Preventative Maintenance Services per specification and RFP terms and conditions. No price increase for the contract period July 1, 2017- June 30, 2018. Thank you, Sk.e i cd 13ea4t Shelly Beach President Medley Fire Protection, Inc. P. 0. Box 8334 Alta Loma, CA 91701 * License #706851 C-16 (877) 463-3539 / (909) 581-0915 / FAX (909) 354-3268 P123 AMENDMENT NO. 004 to Professional Services Agreement (CO #14-239) between Medley Fire Protection Inc. (hereinafter "Contractor") and City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter the "City") This Amendment No. 004 will serve to amend the Professional Services Agreement (hereinafter "Agreement"), CO# 14-239, to incorporate the following: The above mentioned PSA has been in effect for three (3) years and has an option to renew in one (1) year increments to a total of seven (7) years. Separate compensation amount in the Contract Agreement between the City and Fire District to: $41,900 for the City and $8,000 for the Fire district for a total of $49,900. Contractor and City would like to exercise the option to renew CO#14-239 for one (1) additional year (FY 17-18) extending the Agreement date to June 30, 2018. This will be the forth year of the Agreement. All other Terms and Conditions of the original Agreement CO#14-239, will remain in full effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties, through their respective authorized representatives, have executed this Amendment by way of signature by both parties and on the date indicated below. Please return two (2) original signed copies to the City no later than September 28, 2017. The City will process both copies for signature and provide Medley Fire Protection Inc. with one (1) fully executed copy of the Amendment. Medley Fire Protection Inc. City of Rancho Cucamonga By: By: Name Date Name Date Title Title By: Name Date Name Date Title Title (two signatures required if corporation) By: Last Revised: 09/28/2012 Page 1 of 1 P124 DATE: TO: FROM: October 4, 2017 Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager STAFF REPORT INITIATED BY: Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City EngineerC Brian Sandona, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF AN IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND TO ORDER ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1 AND 6 RELATED TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF A WAREHOUSE AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF HERMOSA AVENUE AND 6TH STREET (CASE NO. DRC2016-00522) SUBMITTED BY PHELAN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council: 1. Approve the Improvement Agreement with Phelan Development Company, LLC related to Case No. DRC2016-00522 and authorize the Mayor to sign the agreement; 2. Accept Improvement Security submitted by Phelan Development Company, LLC to guarantee construction of public improvements required for Case No. DRC2016-00522; and 3. Adopt the attached resolution ordering the annexation of the land associated with Case No. DRC2016-00522 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos.1 and 6. BACKGROUND: On January 25, 2017, the Planning Commission approved Case No. DRC2016-00522 for the development of a 102,530 -square foot warehouse building on 4.78 acres in the General Industrial (GI) District located at the northwest corner of Hermosa Avenue and 6th Street. DRC2016-00544 was approved subject to a condition that certain public improvements be constructed including street, sidewalk, street trees, and landscaping improvements. ANALYSIS: The developer, Phelan Development Company, LLC, has submitted an Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security (both on file with the City Clerk) to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond Labor and Materials Bond $161,600 $161,600 Approval of this item by the City Council will allow this development to proceed to the construction phase. Page 1 of 2 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT — DRC2016-00522 October 4, 2017 P125 FISCAL IMPACT: The proposed annexations would satisfy the conditions of approval for the development and supply additional annual revenue into the lighting and landscape maintenance districts in the following amounts: Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B: Street Lighting District No. 1: Street Lighting District No. 6: $ 1,349.11 $ 169.88 $ 245.69 The development includes installation of thirteen (13) street trees which will be maintained by Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B, and 2 LED street lights that will be maintained by Street Light Maintenance District No. 6. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: (if applicable) Not applicable. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 — Vicinity Map Attachment 2 — Resolution No. 17-095 Attachment 3 — Resolution No. 17-096 Attachment 4 — Resolution No. 17-097 Page 2 of 2 hino Point Vista Or Vicinity Map Case No. DRC2016-00522 NOT TO SCALE Oki Town Park 0 Hamilton Family Brewery ChristmHouse Olnn os 8 Gordons Site The Slockz0 RoPlanet 0 •ail. Frito-Lay 0 .44111'..1 "241119 Humboldt Ave 81h SI = 8th St E 0 Public Storage Humboldt Ave 2 Humboldt Ave 0 Trojan Storage of Rancho Cucainongu co N Acacia St s 7th St Adecco Staff ng 0 _ Coca Cola BottlIng 0 ARCO0 Gill St ie Y nth St Universal Technical Institute 0 Southwest Mobile Storage Los Angeles 0 r deemed,. St Enterprise St 8 $ Coo, Y Alof Ontario Rancho Go gle CucamongatE�t 3 Qkwy N v. Tradev ® Waba Grill ATTACHMENT 1 P126 P127 RESOLUTION NO. 17-095 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B (COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL MAINTENANCE DISTRICT) FOR PROJECT CASE NO DRC2016- 00522 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the "Act", said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B (Commercial Industrial Maintenance District) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the Act authorize the annexation of additional territory to the District; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation of resolutions, and assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the Act related to the annexation of territory to the District, Article XIII D of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIII D") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the District on the territory proposed to be annexed to such District; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the District in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act to the annexation of the Territory to the District and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the District; and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act and/or Article XIII D applicable to the authorization to levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization to levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and Resolution No. 17-095 — Page 1 of 5 Attachment 2 P128 WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly agreed for themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns that: (1) The proportionate special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the District Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance and operation expenses of the Improvements; (2) The proposed annual assessment does not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit from the Improvements conferred on each parcel in the Territory. (3) Only the special benefits derived or to be derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements have been included in the proposed annual assessment. WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the District and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation the Territory to the District, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the District, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. PASSED APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 4th day of October 2017. Resolution No. 17-095 — Page 2 of 5 Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property to be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: 6th & Hermosa JP/DF, LLC The legal description of the Property is: Parcel 4 of Parcel Map 4130, in the City of rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as per plat recorded in Book 37 of Parcel Maps, Page 50, records of said county. Assessor's Parcels Numbers of the Property: 0209-221-41-0-000 Resolution No. 17-095 — Page 3 of 5 P129 Exhibit B Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2017-2018 Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B (Commercial Industrial Maintenance District): Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B (Commercial Industrial Maintenance District) (the "Maintenance District") represents landscape sites throughout the Commercial/Industrial Maintenance District. The various landscape sites that are maintained by this district consist of median islands, parkways, street trees and entry monuments. Proposed additions to the Improvements for Project DRC2016-00522: 13 Street trees Resolution No. 17-095 — Page 4 of 5 P13O P131 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2017-2018 Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B (Commercial Industrial Maintenance District): The rate per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) is $282.24 for the fiscal year 2017/18. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B (Commercial Industrial Maintenance District) for DRC2016-00522: Land Use Basis EBU Factor* Rate per EBU* Non -Residential Acre 1.00 $282.24 The proposed annual assessment for the property described in Exhibit A is as follows: 4.78 Acres x 1 EBU Factor x $282.24 Rate per EBU = $1,349.11Annual Assessment Resolution No. 17-095 — Page 5 of 5 P132 RESOLUTION NO.17-096 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS) FOR PROJECT CASE NO DRC2016-00522 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the "Act", said special maintenance district known and designated as Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the Act authorize the annexation of additional territory to the District; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation of resolutions, and assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the Act related to the annexation of territory to the District, Article XIII D of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIII D") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the District on the territory proposed to be annexed to such District; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the District in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act to the annexation of the Territory to the District and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the District; and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act and/or Article XIII D applicable to the authorization to levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization to levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and Resolution No. 17-096 — Page 1 of 5 Attachment 3 P133 WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly agreed for themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns that: (1) The proportionate special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the District Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance and operation expenses of the Improvements; (2) The proposed annual assessment does not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit from the Improvements conferred on each parcel in the Territory. (3) Only the special benefits derived or to be derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements have been included in the proposed annual assessment. WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the District and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation the Territory to the District, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the District, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 4th day of October 2017. Resolution No. 17-096 — Page 2 of 5 Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property to be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: 6th & Hermosa JP/DF, LLC The legal description of the Property is: Parcel 4 of Parcel Map 4130, in the City of rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as per plat recorded in Book 37 of Parcel Maps, Page 50, records of said county. Assessor's Parcels Numbers of the Property: 0209-221-41-0-000 Resolution No. 17-096 — Page 3 of 5 P134 P135 Exhibit B Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2017-2018 Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets): Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets) (the "Maintenance District") is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. These sites consist of several non-contiguous areas throughout the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City. Proposed additions to the Improvements for Project DRC2016-00522: 2 LED Street Lights on 6th Street Resolution No. 17-096 — Page 4 of 5 P136 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2017-2018 Street Light Maintenance District No.1 (Arterial Streets): The rate per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2017/18. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No.1 (Arterial Streets) for DRC2016-00522: Land Use Basis EBU Factor* Rate per EBU* Single Family Residential Parcel 1.00 $17.77 Multi -Family Residential Parcel 1.00 17.77 Non -Residential Acre 2.00 17.77 The proposed annual assessment for the property described in Exhibit A is as follows: 4.78 Acres x 2 EBU Factor x $17.77 Rate per EBU = $169.88 Annual Assessment Resolution No. 17-096 — Page 5 of 5 P137 RESOLUTION NO. 17-097 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL) FOR PROJECT CASE NO. DRC2016-00522 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the "Act", said special maintenance district known and designated as Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial/Industrial)(the "District"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the Act authorize the annexation of additional territory to the District; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation of resolutions, and assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the Act related to the annexation of territory to the District, Article XIII D of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIII D") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the District on the territory proposed to be annexed to such District; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the District in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act to the annexation of the Territory to the District and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the District; and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act and/or Article XIII D applicable to the authorization to levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization to levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and Resolution No. 17-097 — Page 1 of 5 Attachment 4 P138 WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly agreed for themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns that: (1) The proportionate special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the District Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance and operation expenses of the Improvements; (2) The proposed annual assessment does not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit from the Improvements conferred on each parcel in the Territory. (3) Only the special benefits derived or to be derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements have been included in the proposed annual assessment. WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the District and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation the Territory to the District, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the District, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 4th day of October 2017. Resolution No. 17-097 — Page 2 of 5 Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property to be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: 6th & Hermosa JP/DF, LLC The legal description of the Property is: Parcel 4 of Parcel Map 4130, in the City of rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as per plat recorded in Book 37 of Parcel Maps, Page 50, records of said county. Assessor's Parcels Numbers of the Property: 0209-221-41-0-000 Resolution No. 17-097 — Page 3 of 5 P139 Exhibit B Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2017-2018 Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial/Industrial): Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (the "Maintenance District") is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on commercial and industrial streets throughout the City but excluding those areas already in a local maintenance district. Generally, this area encompasses the industrial area of the City south of Foothill Boulevard The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on industrial or commercial streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on industrial or commercial streets generally south of Foothill Boulevard. Proposed additions to the Improvements for Project DRC2016-00522: 2 LED Street Lights on 6th Street Resolution No. 17-097 — Page 4 of 5 P14O P141 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2017-2018 Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial/Industrial): The rate per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) is $51.40 for the fiscal year 2017/18. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial/Industrial) for DRC2016-00522: Land Use Basis EBU Factor* Rate per EBU* Commercial/ Industrial Acre 1.00 $51.40 The proposed annual assessment for the property described in Exhibit A is as follows: 4.78 Acres x 1 EBU Factor x $51.40 Rate per EBU = $245.69 Annual Assessment Resolution No. 17-097 — Page 5 of 5 P142 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: TO: FROM: INITIATED BY: SUBJECT: STAFF REPORT October 4, 2017 Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineers .7 Linda Ceballos, Environmental Programs Manager RECEIVE AND FILE A LETTER OF APPROVAL FOR SUNDAY COMMERCIAL WASTE COLLECTION SERVICE RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file the attached letter from the City Manager to Burrtec Waste Industries, Inc. approving Sunday Commercial Waste Collection Service. BACKGROUND: Burrtec Waste Industries, Inc. (Burrtec) submitted a written request on September 12, 2017 to the City Manager for approval to establish Sunday commercial waste collection service. A Sunday service option would be of benefit to commercial accounts with heavy weekend business, such as restaurants and retail establishments. Some of these businesses struggle with overflowing trash bins on Mondays and many lack the bin enclosure space to add an additional trash bin. Sunday commercial waste collection service has not been offered in the past because there were no disposal facilities open on Sundays to accept the waste. The West Valley Material Recovery Facility has agreed to open on Sundays and has 24-hour holding capacity on the tipping floor. Burrtec will provide drivers, trucks, customer service, supervisors, and other necessary staff and equipment to provide waste collection on Sundays. ANALYSIS: The City Manager and staff have both reviewed the request and agree that it would be beneficial to add Sunday commercial waste collection service. Section 4.6.1, "Schedules", of the Agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Burrtec Waste Industries, Inc. for Solid Waste Services dated June 15, 2016 (Contract No. C016-196) permits the addition of a Sunday service schedule upon written approval of the City Manager. The attached approval letter has been issued to Burrtec and includes conditions related to the cost of service on Sundays and to address the potential for noise in residential areas near commercial customers. The draft approval letter was reviewed by the Public Works Subcommittee on September 20, 2017 and the Subcommittee concurred with staffs analysis and determination to issue the attached approval letter. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impacts expected. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: None. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 — Letter of Approval for Sunday Commercial Waste Collection Service Attachment 2 — Letter from Burrtec Requesting Sunday Commercial Waste Collection Service Page 1 of 1 Mayor L. Dennis Michael l Mayor Pro Tem Lynne B. KenPe3g43 Council Members William J. Alexander, Sam Spagnola, Diane Williams City Manager John R. Gi than 10500 Civic Center Drive 1 P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729-0807 909.477.2700 www.CityofRC.us September 21, 2017 Mr. Mike Arreguin Burrtec Waste Industries Inc. 9890 Cherry Avenue Fontana, CA 92335 Subject: Request to Establish Sunday Commercial Waste Collection Service Dear Mr. Arreguin: Your letter dated September 12, 2017 requesting approval to establish Sunday Commercial Waste Collection Service has been reviewed. In accordance with Section 4.6.1, "Schedules", of the Aareement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Burrtec Waste Industries, Inc. for Integrated Solid Waste Services dated June 15, 2016 (Contract No. C016-196) this letter shall serve as written approval for Burrtec to begin offering Sunday Commercial Waste Collection Service, effective November 1, 2017, per the terms of Contract No. C016-196 and subject to the following conditions: • No business shall be provided with waste collection service on a seven day per week schedule until an applicable rate has been established. It is expected that Burrtec will present and request the addition of a seven day per week service rate during the 2019 rate review. o Burrtec must provide City staff and businesses receiving Sunday service with the Customer Service contact phone number and hours of operation prior to commencing Sunday operations. o Waste collection to businesses within close proximity to residential areas shall only be serviced between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. • Burrtec shall adjust service times as directed by the City's Environmental Programs Manager in the event that a noise complaint is received relative to Sunday service operations. • Burrtec is to provide a list of the businesses subscribing to Sunday service in the monthly report provided to the City. o Burrtec must provide the City with 30 days written notice prior to any schedule changes. If you have any questions, please contact Linda Ceballos, Environmental Programs Manager, at (909) 774-4060. n = Gi on City Manager c: Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Attachment 1 P144 BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC. "We'll Take Care Of It" September 12, 2017 Mr. John Gillison, City Manager City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Dr Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Re: Sunday Commercial Waste Collection Service Dear Mr. Gillison: With the increasing demand for enclosure space and overloaded bins on Monday's and in an effort to better service the City's commercial accounts, Burrtec Waste Industries is respectfully requesting permission to expand our commercial six day per week (Monday — Saturday) waste collection services to include selected collections on Sunday. These collections would primarily include restaurants and large retail locations that are in need of additional weekend service, preventing an overflow of their waste as they maximize their disposal capacity. At this time, the approved City rate structure would not change. In the past Sunday service was not available due to the fact that there was no disposal facilities open to receive the collected waste. Even today all County landfill systems are closed on Sunday, however, Burrtec has decided to open their local waste transfer station that has a permitted 24 hour holding capacity on their tipping floor. Sunday collections would be received and waste would be transferred to the landfill on the following Monday. We estimate that Sunday service wound ultimately affect approximately 120-150 containers benefiting 70-80 accounts. This special collection service not only includes providing drivers and trucks, but Supervisors, customer service and vehicle maintenance staff will be on-site to address any emergency, customer issue or vehicle breakdown. Additionally, as previously mentioned the West Valley Material Recovery Facility located on Napa Street adjacent to the Auto Club Speedway, will be open and staffed. On behalf of Burrtec Waste Industries, we thank you for your time and consideration of our request. Sincerely, 6,_.\\„0 Michael Arreguin Vice President Cc: Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer 9890 Cherry Avenue • Fontana, California 92335 = 909-429-4200 • FAX 909-429-4290 Attachment 2 ITEM G9: TO BE ADDED TO AGENDA: 10/4/17 CITY COUNCIL MEETING STAFF REPORT DATE: October 4, 2017 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION ALLOCATING THE ROAD MAINTENANCE AND REHABILITATION PROGRAM FUNDS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017/18 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution allocating the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) funds for Fiscal Year 2017/18 to the projects listed in the Analysis Section below. BACKGROUND: On April 28, 2017, the Governor signed Senate Bill SB1, the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 creating the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Program in order to address deferred maintenance on the State highway and local street and road systems. Funds made available by the program shall be utilized for basic road maintenance and road rehabilitation projects, and on critical safety projects. Prior to receiving an apportionment of funds under the program in a fiscal year the City shall submit a list of the projects proposed to the California Transportation Commission (CTC), and the funding shall be adopted by resolution. ANALYSIS: The guidelines and regulations for obtaining funds from the program have been updated by the CTC along with subsequent clarifying legislation (Assembly Bill AB135). Since this is the first year of the program, the deadline for submitting the required list to the CTC is October 16, 2017. Staff submitted the required list on September 27, 2017. On October 2, 2017, staff was informed by CTC staff that a resolution of the City Council approving the list would be required by the submittal deadline. Due to the timing of regular City Council meetings, staff has requested that this item be added to the agenda for the October 4, 2017, meeting as an urgency item. The following projects within the current FY 2017/18 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and adopted City Budget are proposed to have funding in the CIP partially allocated from the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (Fund 179): 1) 6th Street from Milliken Avenue to Charles Smith Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation (JL 1930) 2) Jersey Boulevard from Haven Avenue to Rochester Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation (JL 1929) FISCAL IMPACT: Funding for the anticipated revenue from RMRA was included in the Local Streets Maintenance Program in the CIP for Fiscal Year 2017/18. The projects listed above included Gas Tax funding in their respective budgets. After reviewing the CTC program requirements adopted after the CIP and Budget were adopted Page 1 of 2 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT — RMRA FUNDING ALLOCATION 2017/18 October 4, 2017 by the City Council, staff determined that meeting the requirements with the Local Streets Maintenance Program would be difficult due to the reporting requirements. Therefore, staff is recommending that the RMRA funds be allocated to the projects listed above and an appropriation from the Gas Tax Fund will be requested at the time of award of a contract for the Local Streets Program to fully fund that program. The total amount of the budget for the Local Streets Program and the projects listed above is not changed by this resolution. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: None. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 - Resolution No. 17-100 Page 2 of 2 RESOLUTION NO. 17-100 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE PROJECTS FOR THE ROAD MAINTENANCE AND REHABILITATION PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017/18 FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF ROAD MAINTENANCE AND REHABILITATION ACCOUNT (RMRA) FUNDS WHEREAS, The Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Program was created to address deferred maintenance on the state highway and local street and road systems.; and WHEREAS, the funds made available by the program shall be for basic road maintenance and road rehabilitation projects, and on critical safety projects; and WHEREAS, prior to receiving an apportionment of funds under the program in a fiscal year the City shall submit a list of the projects proposed to the California Transportation Commission; and WHEREAS, the following projects within the current FY 2017/18 Capital Improvement Program and adopted City Budget shall be changed to receive funding from the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (Fund 179): 1) 6th Street from Milliken Avenue to Charles Smith Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation (JL 1930). 2) Jersey Boulevard from Haven Avenue to Rochester Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation (JL 1929). NOW, THEREFORE, IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California allocates the funding from the City's Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account for Fiscal Year 2017/18 to the projects listed above in the Capital Improvement Program. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 4th day of October 2017. Resolution No. 17-100 — Page 1 of 1 ATTACHMENT 1 P145 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: October 4, 2017 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Candyce Burnett, City Planner Tom Grahn, Associate Planner REPORT SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2016-00206 - PACIFIC SUMMIT FOOTHILL, LLC - A REQUEST TO AMEND TABLES AND TEXT, INCLUDING CLARIFYING TEXT AS NECESSARY, IN THE GENERAL PLAN TO ALLOW THE DEVELOPMENT OF LAND THAT CONTAINS SLOPES OF 30 PERCENT OR GREATER. ON AUGUST 23, 2017, THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDED APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2016-00206 AMENDING TABLES AND TEXT, INCLUDING CLARIFYING TEXT AS NECESSARY, IN THE GENERAL PLAN TO ALLOW THE DEVELOPMENT OF LAND THAT CONTAINS SLOPES OF 30 PERCENT OR GREATER. CONSIDERATION OF AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2016-00206 AND APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP MODIFICATION SUBTT16605M, DESIGN REVIEW DRC2012-00672, VARIANCE DRC2016-00207, AND TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2012-00673 — HANK STOY -- A REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE 24.19 ACRES INTO 6 PARCELS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF 175 ATTACHED CONDOMINIUM UNITS, TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM 30 - FOOT BUILDING HEIGHT, AND TO REMOVE 180 TREES IN THE MIXED USE (MU) DISTRICT, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, BETWEEN RED HILL COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE AND THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC TRAIL RIGHT-OF-WAY — APNS: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, AND 41 AND 0207-112-09 AND 10. STAFF HAS PREPARED A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS FOR CONSIDERATION. ON AUGUST 23, 2017, THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDED APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2016-00206 AND APPROVED THE RELATED APPLICATIONS CONTINGENT UPON CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF THE GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council take the following actions: Adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project; and Page 1 of 9 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DRC2016-00206, SUBTT16605M, DRC2012=00672, DRC2016-00207, AND DRC20.12-00673 — PACIFIC SUMMIT FOOTHILL, LLC OCTOBER 4, 2017 • Adopt the attached Resolution approving General Plan Amendment DRC2016-00206; and • Adopt the attached Resolution upholding the decisions of the Planning Commission, and denying the appeals, approving Tentative Tract Map Modification SUBTT16605M, Design Review DRC2012-00672, Variance DRC2016-00207, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2012- 00673 contingent upon the City Council's adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts and approval of the General Plan Amendment. BACKGROUND: In 2006, the City Council approved a proposal to develop 21 of the current project 24 -acre site. The previous approval included a Tentative Tract Map to subdivide the site into 6 lots for condominium purposes, and a Design Review application to develop 206 attached condominium units. The City Council also approved a General Plan Amendment and Development Code Amendment to allow the development of slopes 30% and over, provided certain conditions were met. The Development Code Amendment was incorporated into the 2012 Development Code update, the General Plan Amendment was not incorporated into the 2010 General Plan update. In the.late 2000's the property was acquired by the applicant, who increased the project area to 24 acres, submitted a Tentative Tract Map application to subdivide the project site into 8 lots for condominium purposes, and a Design :Review application to develop 175 condominium units. Additionally, the applicant submitted a new General Plan Amendment application to allow the development of slopes 30% and over provided certain conditions were met. (Refer to Attachment 1 — Planning Commission report dated August 23, 2017) On August 23, 2017, the. Planning Commission took the following actions: • Recommended that the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project;. and • Adopted the Resolution recommending that the City Council approve General Plan Amendment DRC2016-00206; and • Adopted the Resolutions approving Tentative Tract Map Modification SUBTT16605M, Design Review DRC2012-00672, Variance DRC20I6-00207, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2012-00673 contingent upon the City Council's adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts and approval of the General Plan Amendment. On August 31, 2017, Mr. ,Hank Stoy filed a timely appeal of the. Planning Commission decisions related to the approval of the Sycamore Heights project (Attachment 8). ANALYSIS: A. Planning Commission Action: The Planning Commission recommended the City Council approve the General Plan Amendment, and approved the Tentative Tract Map Modification, Design Review, Variance, and Tree Removal Permit applications contingent upon the City Council's approval of the General Plan Amendment (Attachments 1 through 6). These applications were initiated by Pacific Summit -Foothill, LLC, to provide for the opportunity to subdivide 24.19 acres into 6 parcels for the development of 175 attached condominium units in the Mixed Use (MU) District on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between Red Hill Country Club Drive and the Pacific Electric Trail Right -of -Way. Page 2 of 9 P146 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DRC2016-00206, SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, AND DRC2012-00673 — PACIFIC SUMMIT FOOTHILL, LLC OCTOBER 4, 2017 The Planning Commission staff report thoroughly analyzes the proposed Tentative Tract Map Modification, and Design Review applications (Attachment 1). The analysis of these applications is complete,, no further analysis is provided in the following discussion, and staff recommends the City Council uphold, the decisions of the Planning Commission and deny their general, appeal, thereby approving Tentative Tract Map Modification SUBTT16605M, and Design Review DRC2012-00672. A discussion of General Plan Amendment DRC2016- 00206, Variance DRC2016-00207, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2012-00673 is provided below. B. General Plan Amendment DRC2016-00206: The General Plan Land Use Element establishes design, grading, and development criteria associated with various slope conditions. These criteria establish policy guidelines for allowing for the development of slopes ranging from "5% or less" up to "15% to 29.9%", and prohibit development on slope conditions of "30% and over". The Development Code provides similar criteria, but was amended to permit the development of slopes. "30% and over" and states that "This is an excessive slope condition and development is prohibited, unless all the following are satisfied: (1) the property is located south of Banyan Street; (ii) at least seventy-five percent (75%) of the lots or parcels that are the subject of the development application are surrounded by lots or parcels improved with structures; (111) the proposed project is determined to appropriately address slope stability and other geological factors of the site;. and (iv) vegetation fuel management for wildfire protection can be achieved and maintained" (General Plan text is non -bold). The Mixed Use General Plan land use designation is not specifically a residential or commercial land use category, but a designation that allows a mix of land uses. Because it can ,permit a variety of land uses, it was never intended to be subject to the Hillside Development criteria of the General Plan or the .Development Code. The intent of the Hillside Development criteria is to regulate single-family residential hillside development on natural slope conditions with slopes 8% and greater, in some areas 30% and over, where the vast majority of eland in that slope category in the foothill areas of the City. The Sycamore Heights project is a 24 -acre fractured site surrounded by developed land that has been so altered by surrounding development (i.e., development of the Red Chief Motel, Sycamore Inn, abandoned water basin, and surrounding residential, commercial and public developments, and graded access roads throughout the site) that the project site is not a natural slope and 'is outside the intent of the Hillside Development requirements of the Development Code. The General Plan Amendment proposes to modify Table LU -19 to include the above referenced text in bold, as well as two policy sections with similar verbiage to the text added to Table LU -19. (see Draft Resolution). C. Appeal of Planning Commission Actions: Following Planning Commission approval of the Sycamore Heights project Mr. Hank Stoy filed an "appeal of the decisions made by the Planning Commission at its meeting of August 23, 2017, relating to the following items: Variance to Development Code, Environmental Issues (Traffic, Wildlife, and Riparian Habitat), and Tree Removal Permit." These items are discussed below. a. Variance DRC2016-00207: The appeal letter states "Some structures would exceed the 30 -foot height limitation for buildings on slopes. Allowing these to be built would negatively impact the view from my property. The developer should be required to comply withthe requirements of the Development Code." Page 3 of 9 P147 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DRC2016-00206, SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, AND DRC2012-00673 — PACIFIC SUMMIT FOOTHILL, LLC OCTOBER 4, 2017 Staff Response to Appeal: The project site is within a Mixed Use zoning designation and. approximately half of the project site is located within the Hillside Overlay District, of which the Development Code establishes building envelopes and maximum building height for properties located in hillside areas. The Hillside Development criteria establish a 30 -foot maximum building height for all structures located in the Hillside. Overlay District. The applicant is proposing a total of 44 condominium units including 26 two-story tri-plex units that are up to a maximum of 29 feet in height, and 18 three- story four-, five-, and six-plex units that are up to a maximum of 35 feet in height. Roughly half of the three-story units are located entirely within the Hillside Overlay District and exceed the allowable maximum 30 -foot building height by 5 feet. Residential structures in the Mixed Use (MU) District outside of the Hillside Overlay District are permitted up to a maximum of 75 feet in height. Because of the approximate distance of 185 feet between the existing and proposed structures, the grade difference of approximately 50 feet between pad elevation for the existing and proposed structures, and the view angle from the existing structures, the proposed 5 -foot height increase does not create a condition that negatively impacts views of the San Bernardino valley. Portions of structures will block views looking down towards Foothill Boulevard, but due to the distances involved and the view angle, the 5 -foot height increase only incrementally disrupts views looking down and not out towards the San Bernardino valley (Attachment 11). Additionally, the City does not have a view ordinance that restricts construction within view areas. The developer designed the project to minimize the view impacts to the existing neighborhood to the north by lowering the pad elevations, increasing the distance to the dwelling units, and reducing: the number of total units. Staff recommends the City Council uphold the decision of the Planning Commission and deny the appeal of Variance DRC2016- 00207. b. Environmental Impacts — Traffic: The appeal letter states "An estimated additional 1042 daily vehicle trips would be generated on already heavily -traveled Foothill Boulevard. it would exacerbate problems at probably the worstintersection in the City — Foothill.and Red Hill Country Club Drive. With only one entrance/exit and right turns only in and out, the numerous U-turns required on Foothill would create safety hazards. Cut -through traffic on Red Hill is bound to increase. Yet, no mitigation measures are being required of the developer." Applicant Response to Appeal: Linscott, Law & Greenspan, the project traffic engineer, responded to the comment (Attachment 10) and stated that the proposed project is expected to generate 1,042 additional vehicles per day (vpd) onto Foothill Boulevard. Foothill Boulevard currently has an average daily traffic volume of 22,000 'vpd in the vicinity of the project site and a daily capacity of 36,000 vpd. Even though the proposed project will add 1,042 additional daily trips to Foothill Boulevard, the existing roadway has more than adequate capacity to accommodate the increase in daily trips associated with the proposed project. The Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) identifies that under existing traffic conditions the intersection of Red Hill Country Club Drive and Foothill Boulevard currently operates at unacceptable Level of Service (LOS) F (on a scale of descending LOS from, A to F) during the AM and PM peak hours. The proposed project will add some traffic to the already deficient intersection. The TIA recommends an improvement at that Page 4 of 9 P148 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DRC2016-00206, SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, AND DRC2012-00673 — PACIFIC SUMMIT FOOTHILL, LLC OCTOBER 4, 2017 intersection in order to help alleviate the existing peak hour deficiency. Conditions of approval require the installation of traffic signage at the Red Hill Country Club Drive and Foothill Boulevard intersection to restrict northbound and southbound left -turn and through movements during the AM peak period (7:00 AM -- 9:00 AM) and the PM peak period (4:00 PM — 6:00 PM). Primary access to the project site will be provided via a proposed "right -turn in/right- turn out only" gated driveway on Foothill Boulevard. A secondary Emergency Vehicle Access (EVA) provides access to Red Hill Country Club Drive. The Rancho Cucamonga General Plan designates Foothill Boulevard as a Major Divided Arterial (i.e., 94 -foot paved width, inclusive of a 14 -foot median within a 120 -foot right-of-way). The restriction of turning movements at the primary access is consistent with the City's Circulation/Mobility Plan, which indicates that left -turn access on Foothill Boulevard is allowed at signalized intersections only. Due to the "right -turn in/right-turn out only" restriction project residents/guests will have to make U-turn movements at the adjacent intersections of either Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue, Foothill Boulevard and Red Hill Country Club Drive, or Foothill Boulevard and San Bernardino Road. Traffic volume forecasting and intersection analysis included in the TIA considers the project U-turn movements at these key study intersections. The TIA prepared for the project did provide a project cut -through discussion relative to the Red Hill Country Club Drive neighborhood. Based on the project trip distribution patterns of the traffic study, it was assumed that 20% of outbound project traffic would be considered new cut -through trips (i.e., 13 of the 64 outbound AM peak hour trips and 7 of the 32 outbound PM peak hour trips). These outbound project trips were assumed to travel through the Red Hill Country Club Drive neighborhood to access Carnelian Street and/or Base Line Road. Staff Response to Appeal: The initial Study and TIA addresses traffic impacts, project access, and cut -through traffic and appropriate conditions of approval are established for project impacts. Staff concurs with the traffic impact analysis and mitigation monitoring proposed as part of the project. The applicant is required to pay in lieu fees towards future improvements along Foothill Boulevard and construct frontage improvements adjacent to their project along Foothill Boulevard. Staff recommends the City Council uphold the decision of the Planning Commission and deny the appeal of environmental impacts to traffic. c. Environmental Impacts -- Wildlife: The appeal letter states "The impact on wildlife is unrealistically understated. For example, the red tail hawk (a protected species) frequently seen on Red Hill is not even mentioned in the biological resources survey." Applicant Response to Appeal: RCA Associates, the project biologist, responded to the comment (Attachment 9) and identified that as part of their evaluation of the project site they documented all wildlife observed on the site during their field surveys. Further identifying that the red-tailed hawk was not observed, and since the species is not listed as threatened, endangered, or a species of special concern a detailed discussion of the species was not provided. Staff Response to Appeal: The Initial Study prepared for the project evaluates impacts to biological resources associated with development of the project site and relied on Page 5 of 9 P149 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DRC2016-00206, SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, AND DRC2012-00673 — PACIFIC SUMMIT FOOTHILL, LLC OCTOBER 4, 2017 the 2003 Biological Assessment and updated 2017 Biological Assessment to assess project -related impacts. No threatened, endangered, or species of concern were identified in either assessment. The level of constraint that a sensitive biological resource would pose to potential developments typically depends on the following criteria: 1) the relative value of that resource; 2) the amount or degree of impact to the resource; 3) whether or not impacts to the resource would be in violation of State and/or Federal regulations or laws; 4) whether or not impacts to the resource would require permitting by resources agencies; and 5) the degree to which impacts on the resource would otherwise be considered "significant" under CEQA. Based on an evaluation using these criteria, existing disturbed/disked areas were considered of a relatively low biological constraint and value given the context in which they occur. This designation is because of the high level of disturbance that has resulted in low biological diversity, absence of special -status plant communities, and overall low potential for special -status species to utilize or reside within these areas. Because no threatened or endangered species are likely to occur in disturbed areas due to the highly -disturbed conditions present in a predominantly degraded environment, construction activities in these areas would not likely jeopardize the continued' existence of listed species, nor would construction adversely impact designated critical habitat. Impacts to disturbed areas would also not be expected to substantially affect special -status resources or cause a population of plant or wildlife species to drop below self-sustaining levels, nor would impacts be expected to substantially alter diversity of wildlife in the area due to the current degraded habitat conditions. 'Project mitigation measures require Nesting Bird Surveys and Burrowing Owl Surveys consistent with the Fish and Game Code and the Migratory Bird Act prior to the issuance of grading permits. Staff recommends the. City Council uphold the decision of the Planning Commission and deny the appeal of environmental impacts to wildlife. d. Environmental Impacts — Riparian Habitat: The appeal letter states "Preservation of riparian habitat is a stated goal in the City's General Plan (Policy RC -8.1). But this project would destroy a considerable amount of it." Applicant Response to Appeal: RCA Associates, the project biologist, studied the site to identify the locations of any potential riparian/riverine habitat to determine whether Federal and/or State jurisdiction applies (Attachment 9). The study (Jurisdictional Delineation) identified five riverine features — four conveying drainage from the condominium project to the north and one conveying drainage from the Red Hill Country Club golf course. All features drain into developed storm drain facilities directly south of the site. Based on US Army Corps of Engineers (USACOE) and California Department of Fish. and Wildlife (CDFW) criteria these features are not subject to their jurisdiction. Staff Response to Appeal: The Initial Study evaluated a Jurisdictional Delineation prepared for the project site. The Jurisdictional Delineation evaluated five drainage channels that bisect the projectsite and analyzed the impacts to riverine habitats present along the channels. Based on the results of the delineation and the jurisdictional analysis, it was determined that the five existing channels do not meet the criteria as a Waters of the State or Waters of the United States. The channels do not meet the characteristics that the define them as a nexus to the nearest Traditional Page 6 of 9 P150 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DRC2016-00206, SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, AND DRC2012-00673 — PACIFIC SUMMIT FOOTHILL, LLC OCTOBER 4, 2017 Navigable Water, located approximately 0.4 miles east of the project site. Waters that flow through the five channels flow in a southerly direction and appear to be a direct result of runoff from the development directly north of the site. The Jurisdictional Delineation determined that jurisdictional waters were not present on the site during their field investigations, and that the proposed project will not have an impact to the Waters of the State and recommends complying with California Fish and Game Code, Section 1602, prior to issuance of any grading permit. General Plan Policy RC -8.1 addresses preserving "the integrity of riparian habitat ... and sensitive wildlife habitat that supports biological resources." Although the policy is focused on preserving riparian habitat in the City's Sphere of Influence, located in the foothills north of the City, the policy would still be applicable to riparian habitat anywhere within the City. Here, the Jurisdictional Delineation analyzed the five drainage channels that bisect the site and determined that they are the result of runoff from the existing development to the north, that jurisdictional waters were not present during field investigations, and that the project will not have an impact to the Waters of the State. Although the Jurisdictional Delineation determined that jurisdictional waters were not present on the project site, it recommended compliance with the CDFW recommended mitigation measure prior to issuance of any grading permit. The Biological Resources section of the project Mitigated Negative Declaration includes a mitigation measure requiring the applicant to provide proof to the City that the Streambed Alteration Agreement (1602 Agreement) process has been concluded. Staff recommends the City Council uphold the decision of the Planning Commission and deny the appeal of environmental impacts to riparian habitat. e. Tree Removal Permit DRC2012-00673: The appeal letter states "This project would require removing 180 trees. To preserve the areas aesthetics and character, more mature trees should be saved. And it is difficult to believe that the nesting bird survey did not find a single nest in any of the trees slated for removal." Staff Response to Appeal: The Arborist Report prepared for the project site evaluated a total of 198 trees on-site, 64 of which meet Development Code criteria to be classified as Heritage Trees, and 18 of those Heritage Trees are recommended for preservation. The 180 trees not identified as suitable for preservation are considered over -mature, have poor growth character, have advanced decay, some are dead or are in poor general health, and many of these trees have further declined in health due to the prolonged effects of the drought. Additionally, the location of several trees, although they are in good health, conflict with proposed improvements. The Conceptual Landscape Plan prepared for the project demonstrates that the 180 trees removed will be replaced with a variety of 36 -inch box, 24 -inch box, and 15 -gallon size trees, in a quantity in excess of the number of trees removed. A Biological Assessment prepared for the project did identify the presence of common birds on the project site, but no threatened, endangered, or species of concern were identified. Burrowing Owl and Nesting Bird Surveys were prepared, but did not identify the presence of any Burrowing Owls or nesting birds. Project mitigation measures require Nesting Bird Surveys and Burrowing Owl Surveys consistent with the Fish and Game Code and the Migratory Bird Act prior to the issuance of grading permits. Staff recommends the City Council uphold the decision of the Planning Commission and deny the appeal of Tree Removal Permit DRC2012-00673. Page 7 of 9 P151 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DRC2016-00206, SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, AND DRC2012-00673 -- PACIFIC SUMMIT FOOTHILL, LLC OCTOBER 4, 2017 D. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study (IS) of the potential environmental effects of the project (Exhibit P of the Planning Commission staff report). Based on the findings contained in that IS, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures related to aesthetics, agricultural resources, air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, geology and soils, greenhouse gas emissions, hydrology and water quality, noise, and tribal cultural resources there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) was prepared and was circulated on July 3, 2017. A comment letter was received from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) on July 27, 2017 in response to the circulated IS/MND. The only comment CDFW had was in relation to the possible Jurisdictional Waters on the project site. The applicant and their biologists prepared a Jurisdictional Delineation to address CDFW's comments. The Jurisdictional Delineation determined that jurisdictional waters were not present on the project site, but recommended compliance with the CDFW recommended mitigation measure prior to issuance of any grading permit. The Biological Resources section of the IS/MND, was revised to include a mitigation measure requiring the applicant to provide proof to the City that the Streambed Alteration Agreement (1602 Agreement) process has been concluded. According to CEQA Section 15073.5(a), recirculation of a negative declaration is required prior to its adoption when it has been substantially revised after public notice of its availability has been given pursuant to Section 15072. Furthermore, CEQA Section 15073.5(b) states, "a "substantial revision" of the negative declaration shall mean: (1) a new avoidable significant effect is identified and mitigation measure or project revisions must be added in order to reduce the effect to insignificance, or (2) the lead agency determines that the proposed mitigation measures or project revisions will not reduce potential effects to less than significance and new measures or revisions must be required." Here, either the CDFW will determine that notification under Section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code is not required for the project, or they will require the applicant obtain a Streambed Alteration Agreement. The IS/MND was revised to include a discussion of the Jurisdictional Delineation for the project site and a mitigation measure requiring a Streambed Alteration Agreement was added to the MND and the project conditions of approval. The addition of a condition of approval requiring a Streambed Alteration Agreement is not considered substantial evidence in light of the whole record that cannot be mitigated. Therefore, the Streambed Alteration Agreement mitigation measure is not a substantial revision to the MND, and recirculation of the MND is not required. FISCAL IMPACT: The project site currently is assessed an annual property tax. A percentage of this annual tax is shared with the City. The proposed development will increase the value of the project site and the City's annual share of the property tax will increase accordingly. The project proponent also will be responsible for paying one-time impact fees. These fees are intended to address the increased demand for City services due to the proposed project. The following types of services that these impact fees would support include the following: library services, transportation infrastructure, drainage infrastructure, animal services, police, parks, and community and recreation services. Page 8 of 9 P152 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DRC2016-00206, SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, AND DRC2012-00673 — PACIFIC SUMMIT FOOTHILL, LLC OCTOBER 4, 2017 The overall project, during construction may increase construction -related employment and, following its completion, will increase employment due to new industrial uses, and may increase employment at surrounding existing and future businesses that will provide services to the employees and customers of the project. Also, a positive fiscal impact for the City will occur through increased sales tax revenue generated by the employees and customer patronage of local businesses. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Although a specific current City Council goal does not apply to the project, the project is consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan and the objectives of the Development Code. The proposed General Plan Amendment is consistent with the General Plan Public Health and Safety element and its policies related to hillside development. The proposed General Plan Amendment will not preclude the continued enforcement of the Hillside Development Guidelines applicable to development of property with slope conditions. The proposed project is in a developed area with similar hillside/slope conditions that will not be impacted by the project. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan as it identifies existing slope conditions and how the project integrates those conditions into its design, and proposed project is designed to minimize any impact to surrounding hillside developments. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660 -foot radius of the project site. One comment letter was received and is attached (Attachment 12). ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 Attachment 2 Attachment 3 Attachment 4 Attachment 5 Attachment 6 Attachment 7 — Attachment 8 — Attachment 9 — Attachment 10 — Attachment 11 — Attachment 12 — Attachment 13 — Attachment 14 - Planning Commission Staff Report dated August 23, 2017 Planning Commission Resolution No. 17-75 Recommending Approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2016-00206 Planning Commission Resolution No. 17-76 Approving Tentative Tract Map Modification SUBTT16605M Planning Commission Resolution No. 17-77 Approving Design Review DRC2012-00672 Planning Commission Resolution No. 17-78 Approving Variance DRC2016- 00207 Planning Commission Resolution No. 17-79 Approving Tree Removal Permit DRC2012-00673 Planning Commission Minutes dated August 23, 2017 Mr. Hank Stoy Appeal Letter dated August 31, 2017 RCA Associates Response Letter Linscott, Law & Greenspan Response Letter SlopeNiew Exhibit Charles & Lynda Treenor comment letter Resolution of Approval for General Plan Amendment DRC2016-00206 Resolution Upholding Planning Commission Approval of Tentative Tract Map Modification SUBTT16605M, Design Review DRC2012-00672, Variance DRC2016-00207 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2012-00673 Page 9 of 9 P153 P154 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: August 23, 2017 TO: FROM: Candyce Burnett, City Planner INITIATED BY: Tom Grahn, Associate Planner SUBJECT: STAFF REPORT Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Attachment 1 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2016-00206 - PACIFIC SUMMIT FOOTHILL, LLC - A request to amend tables and text, including clarifying text as necessary, in the General Plan to allow the development of land that contains slopes of 30 percent or greater. Related files: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16605M, Design Review DRC2012- 00672, Variance DRC2016-00207, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2012-00673. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. This application will be forwarded to the City Council for final action. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP MODIFICATION SUBTT16605M - PACIFIC SUMMIT FOOTHILL, LLC - A request subdivide 24.19 acres into 6 parcels for the development of 175 attached condominium units in the Mixed Use (MU) District located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between Red Hill Country Club Drive and Pacific Electric Trail Right -of -Way; APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2016- 00206, Design Review DRC2012-00672, Variance DRC2016-00207, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2012-00673. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2012-00672 - PACIFIC SUMMIT FOOTHILL, LLC - A request to develop 175 attached condominium units on 24.19 acres of land in Mixed Use (MU) District, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between Red Hill Country Club Drive and the Pacific Electric Trail Right -of -Way; APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2016-00206, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16605M, Variance DRC2016- 00207, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2012-00673. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VARIANCE DRC2016-00207 - PACIFIC SUMMIT FOOTHILL, LLC - A request to exceed the 30 foot building envelop established by Development Code Section 17.122.020.D.1.e.(i and ii) for the develop 175 attached condominium units on 24.19 acres of land in the Mixed Use (MU) District, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between Red Hill Country Club Drive and the Pacific Electric Trail Right -of -Way; APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10. P155 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2016-00206, SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, AND DRC2012-00673 — PACIFIC SUMMIT FOOTHILL, LLC August 23, 2017 Page 2 Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2016-00206, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16605M, Design Review DRC2012-00672, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2012-00673. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TREE REMOVAL PERMIT - DRC2012-00673 - PACIFIC SUMMIT FOOTHILL, LLC - A request to remove 180 trees associated with the proposed development of 175 attached condominium units on 24.19 acres of land in Mixed Use (MU) District, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between Red Hill Country Club Drive and the Pacific Electric Trail Right -of -Way; APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2016-00206, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16605M, Design Review DRC2012-00672, and Variance DRC2016-00207. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission take the following actions: • Recommend that the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project; and • Adopt the attached Resolution recommending that the City Council approve General Plan Map Amendment DRC2016-00206; and • Adopt the attached Resolutions approving Tentative Tract Map Modification SUBTT16605M, Design Review DRC2012-00672, Variance DRC2016-00207, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2012-00673 contingent upon City Council adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts and approval of the General Plan Amendment. PROJECT REVIEW AND BACKGROUND: Previous Public Hearing: The proposed applications were originally scheduled for Planning Commission consideration on August 9, 2017. During circulation of the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) the City received comments from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) and property owners in the vicinity of the project site that raised questions regarding the proposed project. The August 9, 2017 staff report recommended the Planning Commission continue the applications to an unspecific date (Exhibit A). At the August 9, 2017 Planning Commission meeting staff revised the recommended action and requested that the Commission continue review of the applications to August 23, 2017. Previous Project Site Approvals: In 2006 the Planning Commission considered a series of applications proposing development on 21 acres of the current 24 -acre project site. On April 12, 2006, the Planning Commission took the following actions related to these previous entitlement applications: PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2016-00206, SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, AND DRC2012-00673 — PACIFIC SUMMIT FOOTHILL, LLC August 23, 2017 Page 3 • Recommended to the City Council approval of the following: o General Plan Amendment DRC2004-00339 — A request to amend the General Plan to allow the development of land that contains a 30 percent slope. o Development Code Amendment DRC2004-00352 — A request to amend the Development Code to allow the development of the land that contains a 30 percent slope. • Approved the following applications contingent upon City Council approval of the above applications: o Tentative Tract 16605 -- A residential subdivision of 8 lots for condominium purposes (206 units) on 21 acres of land. o Design Review DRC2003-00637 — The design review of building elevations and detailed site plan for 206 condominiums on 21 acres of land. o Variance DRC2005-01061 — A request to reduce the parking lot setback from 45 feet minimum to 10 feet to allow improvements to an existing parking lot for the Sycamore Inn Restaurant. o Minor Development Review DRC2004-00826 -- Parking lot, loading area modifications and covered patio area at the Historic Sycamore Inn Restaurant. Or June 21, 2006, the City Council subsequently approved the General Plan and Development Code Amendment applications. Development Code Amendment DRC2004-00352 was incorporated into Development Code Section 17.52.020(E) thereby providing an exception to the prohibition of development on slopes 30 percent and over, provided certain conditions are satisfied. General Plan Amendment DRC2004-00339 was not incorporated into the 2010 General Plan update. The entitlement applications related to the project (i.e., Design Review DRC2003-00637, Variance DRC2005-01061, and Minor Development Review DRC2004-00826) expired on April 6, 2011. No time extensions for those applications were requested or granted; however, the Planning Commission has , approved two subsequent 1 -year time extensions for Tentative Tract SUBTT16605 extending the maps expiration date to April 12, 2018. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: The project site is located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between San Bernardino Road and Baker Avenue in a hillside area on the southerly flank of Red Hill and surrounding the historic Sycamore Inn restaurant (Exhibit D). The site is irregularly shaped and is approximately 2,500 feet (east to west) by approximately 750 feet (north to south). The site topography is relatively flat in the western portion with slopes in excess 30 percent slope in the eastern portion. Elevation grade changes range from a high of 1,375 along the northern property line to a low of 1,245 along the south property line, a grade difference of approximately 130 feet. The site is surrounded to P156 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2016-00206, SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, AND DRC2012-00673 — PACIFIC SUMMIT FOOTHILL, LLC August 23, 2017 Page 4 the north, south, east and west by existing residential and commercial land uses, as indicated in the following table. ANALYSIS: A. General Plan Amendment DRC2016-00206: The General Plan Land Use Element, Table LU -19 Slope Development Guidelines, establishes design, grading, and development criteria associated with various slope conditions. These criteria establish policy guidelines for allowing for the development of slopes ranging from "5% or less" up to "15% to 29.9%", and prohibit development on slope conditions of "30% and over" (Exhibit B). Development Code Section 17.52.020 provides similar criteria for development standards on slopes ranging from "5% natural slope or less" up to "30% and over", but also includes the provisions of the previously adopted Development Code Amendment (DRC2004-00352). This Development Code Amendment was applicable to the criteria for slopes "30% and over" and states that "This is an excessive slope condition and development is prohibited, unless all the following are satisfied: (i) the property is located south of Banyan Street; (ii) at least seventy-five percent (75%) of the lots or parcels that are the subject of the development application are surrounded by lots or parcels improved with structures; (iii) the proposed project is determined to appropriately address slope stability and other geological factors of the site; and (iv) vegetation fuel management for wildfire protection can be achieved and maintained" (Exhibit C). The Mixed Use General Plan land use designation is not specifically a residential or commercial land use category, but a designation that allows a mix of land uses (i.e., residential, commercial, agricultural, recreation, open space, education, and assembly uses). In recognition of this unique classification, it is a separate land use district in the Development Code. Because it can permit a variety of land uses, predominantly, but not specifically residential, it was never intended to be subject to the Hillside Development criteria of the General Plan and Development Code, in fact, this is the only Mixed Use district in the City with a slope condition. The intent of the Hillside Development criteria of the General Plan and Development Code was to regulate single-family residential hillside development on slopes 8% and greater, and in some areas 30% and over where the vast majority of land in that slope category is located in residential districts in the foothill areas of the City. Additionally, the intent of the Hillside Development criteria was to address the development of natural slopes, and in this case, we have a 24 -acre fractured site surrounded P157 Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Vacant Mixed Use Mixed Use (MU) District North Residential condominiums, vacant, and Red Hill Country Club Open Space, Low Residential, and Medium Residential Low (L) and Medium (M) Residential Districts South Residential and Commercial Mixed Use and Medium Residential Mixed Use (MU) District and Medium (M) Residential District East Pacific Electric Trail, Route 66 Trail Head, Residential Open Space and Medium Residential Medium (M) Residential District West Residential and Commercial Mixed Use Mixed Use (MU) District ANALYSIS: A. General Plan Amendment DRC2016-00206: The General Plan Land Use Element, Table LU -19 Slope Development Guidelines, establishes design, grading, and development criteria associated with various slope conditions. These criteria establish policy guidelines for allowing for the development of slopes ranging from "5% or less" up to "15% to 29.9%", and prohibit development on slope conditions of "30% and over" (Exhibit B). Development Code Section 17.52.020 provides similar criteria for development standards on slopes ranging from "5% natural slope or less" up to "30% and over", but also includes the provisions of the previously adopted Development Code Amendment (DRC2004-00352). This Development Code Amendment was applicable to the criteria for slopes "30% and over" and states that "This is an excessive slope condition and development is prohibited, unless all the following are satisfied: (i) the property is located south of Banyan Street; (ii) at least seventy-five percent (75%) of the lots or parcels that are the subject of the development application are surrounded by lots or parcels improved with structures; (iii) the proposed project is determined to appropriately address slope stability and other geological factors of the site; and (iv) vegetation fuel management for wildfire protection can be achieved and maintained" (Exhibit C). The Mixed Use General Plan land use designation is not specifically a residential or commercial land use category, but a designation that allows a mix of land uses (i.e., residential, commercial, agricultural, recreation, open space, education, and assembly uses). In recognition of this unique classification, it is a separate land use district in the Development Code. Because it can permit a variety of land uses, predominantly, but not specifically residential, it was never intended to be subject to the Hillside Development criteria of the General Plan and Development Code, in fact, this is the only Mixed Use district in the City with a slope condition. The intent of the Hillside Development criteria of the General Plan and Development Code was to regulate single-family residential hillside development on slopes 8% and greater, and in some areas 30% and over where the vast majority of land in that slope category is located in residential districts in the foothill areas of the City. Additionally, the intent of the Hillside Development criteria was to address the development of natural slopes, and in this case, we have a 24 -acre fractured site surrounded P157 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2016-00206, SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, AND DRC2012-00673 -- PACIFIC SUMMIT FOOTHILL, LLC August 23, 2017 Page 5 by developed land. The case can be made the site has been so altered by surrounding development (Le., development of the Red Chief Motel, Sycamore Inn, abandoned water basin, and surrounding residential, commercial and public developments, and graded access roads throughout the site) that the project site is not a natural slope and is outside the intent of the Hillside Development requirements of the Development Code. The proposed General Plan Amendment proposes to modify Table LU -19 to include the above referenced text in bold, as well as two policy sections similarly (see Draft Resolution). B. Tentative Tract Map Modification SUBTT16605M: The project site is proposed to be subdivided into 6 parcels for condominium purposes. The 6 parcels range in size from 2.49 acres to 5.52 acres and are each designed to accommodate a large number of condominium units within the project. There are no minimum lot area requirements within the Mixed Use (MU) District; however, the project site was designed so that the residential development of each parcel will conform to all applicable residential development standards including, but not limited to, density (up to 50 dwelling units per acre), building setbacks (50% to 75% reduction along major and secondary arterials), and landscaping (10% of project site). C. Design Review DRC2012-00672: The applicant is requesting the Design Review of a 175 - unit multi -family condominium development on 24.19 acres, a density of 7.23 dwelling units per acre (Exhibits E & F). The proposed project will be a gated community with 1 vehicle entrance on Foothill Boulevard, located west of the Sycamore Inn restaurant, and 1 Emergency Vehicle Access (EVA) gate on Red Hill Country Club Drive. The site plan wraps around the Sycamore Inn restaurant providing a single right -in -right -out driveway entrance to the site. A total of 9 live/work units are provided adjacent to the Foothill Boulevard driveway, with adjacent parking and pedestrian access. Units are provided throughout the 24 -acre site, with most units situated east of the Sycamore Inn on two large relatively flat graded pads. Building pads on the lower tier east of the Sycamore Inn, directly adjacent to Foothill Boulevard, are approximately 6 to 21 feet above the existing street grade, and the building pads on the upper tier east of the Sycamore Inn are approximately 60 feet below the existing condominium project to the north. A large 30 -foot -high Mechanically Stabilized Embankment (MSE) separates the lower and upper building tiers (Exhibit I). Building pads are located throughout the project site and are situated so that their eventual development will minimize impacts to adjacent properties. The 175 units are provided throughout the project site in 44 individual buildings, each containing between 3 and 6 residential units. Units are provided in either a two-story or three-story building complex. There are 26 two-story units, 29 feet tall, with units ranging in size from 1,296 square feet to 1,701 square feet and 18 three-story units, 35 feet tall, with units ranging in size from 1,672 square feet to 2,108 square feet. Architectural styles include Santa Barbara and Provence, and include 360 degree architectural elements such as: tile roofs, stucco finish, multi -paned windows, metal balconies, wood shutters, and additional architectural embellishments (Exhibit M). Parking is provided in two -car garages for each unit, providing 350 parking spaces, 9 parking spaces for the live/work units, and 130 open parking spaces. D. Residential Unit Breakdown: The proposed development will consist of 175 housing units housed in 44 two- and three-story condominium buildings (Exhibit E). The unit mix consists P158 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2016-00206, SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC201•6-00207, AND DRC2012-00673 — PACIFIC SUMMIT FOOTHILL, LLC August 23, 2017 Page 6 of 28 two-bedroom units (at 1,296 square feet), 119 three-bedroom units (ranging in size from 1,540 square feet to 2,108 square feet) and 28 four-bedroom units (ranging 'in size from 1,976 square feet to 1,995 square feet). The 9 live/work units include 2 two-bedroom units (with 1,531 square feet of living area and 249 square feet of commercial floor area) and 7 three-bedroom units (ranging in size from 1,782 square feet to 1,916 square feet of living area and 249 square feet of commercial floor area) (Exhibit M). E. Recreational Amenities: The Development Code requires that multi -family projects containing between 101 and 200 units provide 5 recreational amenities, or their equivalent (Section 17.36.010.E.3) throughout the 'project site (Exhibit E). The project exceeds this requirement and provides recreational amenities designed to meet the interests of their residents. The proposed recreational amenities include: 1. Central pool courtyard. 2. Six (6) barbeque facilities throughout the site. 3. Two (2) tot -lot play areas. 4. Five (5) open space areas. F. Project Parking Overview: The proposed project requires a total of 432 parking spaces based on a summation of uses within theproject including the number of bedrooms in each unit, the LivelWork commercial floor area, and guest parking (Exhibit E). This includes 364 parking spaces based on the bedroom mix ,(322 of which are required to be covered in a garage or carport), 9 parking spaces for the LiveNVork retail component (based on 2,241 square feet of retail floor area), and 59 guest parking spaces. The design of the complex proposes to provide a total of 489 parking spaces on-site through a mix of garage and open parking spaces. The Development Code's standards for mixed use development stipulate that parking for mixed use projects .is based on a summation of parking required for the individual uses within the development. On-site parking is verified through a parking study, which reviews the adequacy of the number of proposed parking spaces; this parking study is then subject to peer review by a third -party consultant contracted by the City. If it is determined that a reduced number of parking spaces is adequate for all of the uses within a mixed use project, an application for a Minor Exception or Variance can be made to reduce the required number of on-site parking spaces. However, the current application meets or exceeds all on-site parking requirements for garage, live/work, and guest parking, and as such, peer review was determined to be unnecessary as no reduction on on-site parking is proposed. G. Project Parking Analysis: Section 17.64 of the Development Code establishes parking requirements for the project as follows: P159 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2016-00206, SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, AND DRC2012-00673 -- PACIFIC SUMMIT FOOTHILL, LLC August 23, 2017 Page 7 Type Number of Development Code Units Standard Required Covered Parking Parking Spaces Required Total Provided Parking Two Bedroom Units28 2.0 Spaces/Unit 1 in are a or car ort 28 56 56 Three Bedroom Units119 2.0 Spaces/Unit 2 in are a or ca •ort 238 238 238 Four Bedroom Units SpaceslUnit 28 (2 in garage or carport) 56 70 70 (includes 14 uncoverd Retail Parking 2 241 1 space for each 250 square feet of leasable area 0 9 9 Guest Parkin. 175 1 per 3 units 0 59 116 Enclosed Gara.e S.aces 322 Total Parkin. Spaces Re. uired &rTotaI Parkin • Spaces,Provided;On-Site !ti` "1 �, . .' .489, The applicant has submitted a Parking Analysis (Exhibit G), which finds that the proposed number of parking spaces exceeds the parking demand for the proposed mix of uses within the project. H. Variance DRC2016-00207: Approximately half of the project site is located within the Hillside Overlay District of the Zoning Map, of which the Development Code establishes building envelopes and maximum building height for properties located in hillside areas. Hillside Development criteria, Section 17.122.020(D)(e) of the Development Code, establishes a 30 -foot maximum building height for all structures located in the Hillside Overlay District. The applicant is proposing a total of 44 condominium units including 26 two-story tri-plex units up to a maximum of 29 feet in height, and 18 three-story four-, five-, and six-plex units up to a maximum of 35 feet in height. Roughly half of the three-story units are located within the Hillside Overlay District and exceed the allowable maximum 30 -foot building height. The findings of facts below support the necessary Variance findings, which are required by the City's Development Code: Finding: Strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would result in a difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this Code. Fact: The Hillside Development building height development standard is necessary to regulate maximum building height and bulk on slope conditions when regulating the development of a single-family home in a residential district; these development standards were not intended to regulate building height for multi -family development in the Mixed Use District. Here, the applicant proposes grading the site into large flat building tiers to accommodate the proposed attached multi -family development. As the design and development of the proposed units will not be located on a slope condition and less than half of the project site is located in the Hillside Overlay District, enforcement of the development standard is inconsistent with the objectives of the Development Code. Finding: There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone. P160 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2016-00206, SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, AND DRC2012-00673 — PACIFIC SUMMIT FOOTHILL, LLC August 23, 2017 Page 8 Fact: The eastern portion of the project site has a grade change ranging from a high of 1,375 feet along the northern property line to a low of 1,245 feet along the southern, property line, a difference of approximately 130 feet. The applicant is proposing to grade the site into two large building tiers to accommodate the development of attached multi -family condominium buildings ranging from 3 to 6 units in 44 buildings. The entire project site is located within the Mixed Use District and the eastern portion of the site is subject to the Hillside Overlay District. The Mixed Use District permits a• density up to 50 dwelling units per acre and buildings up to 75 feet high. The multi -family units located within the Hillside Overlay District propose to exceed Hillside Development criteria by 5 feet, which is over 60 feet below the height of buildings. to the north. The location of these buildings and their proposed height are situated so that their eventual development will not negatively impact adjacent properties. Finding: Strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same zone. Fact: The increase in building height allows the proposed multi -family units to be distributed throughout the entire project site. Enforcement of the height limit would not prevent the proposed grading and would unduly force a density shift within the project so that a higher number of units would be located on the westerly half of the project, so that all units on the easterly half of the project site were within the Hillside Development standard height limits. This density shift will negatively impact the Sycamore Inn and surrounding properties by focusing a significant increase in the number of units on the westerly half of the project site. Finding: The granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same zone. Fact: The project site is located in the Mixed Use District, which was designed to accommodate a variety of land uses. The Mixed Use District was never intended to apply to properties located on hillside conditions or be subject to the Hillside Overlay District. Because the Mixed Use District can accommodate a variety of land uses it was never intended to be subject to the Hillside ,Development criteria of the General Plan and Development Code, in fact, this is the only Mixed Use district in the City with a slope condition. The intent of the Hillside Development criteria of the General Plan and Development Code was to regulate single-family residential hillside development on slopes 8% and greater. The intent of the Hillside Development criteria was to address the development natural slopes, and in this case, we have a 24 -acre fractured site surrounded by developed land. The project site has been so altered by surrounding development, is not a natural slope, is outside the intent of the Hillside Development requirements of the Development Code, and is so unique that there are no other Mixed Use District slope conditions within the City. Finding: The granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. P161 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2016-00206, SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, AND DRC2012-00673 — PACIFiC SUMMIT FOOTHILL, LLC August 23, 2017 Page 9 Fact: The increased building heights will not negatively impact the surrounding property owners. Due to the grade difference between the project site and properties to the north, the 5 -foot increase in building height will not negatively impact views of properties to the north and the additional height increase only impacts views on the project site. I. Tree Removal Permit DRC2012-00673: The Arborist Report (Jim Borer, August 2012) evaluated a total of 198 trees on the project site. Of those 198 trees, 64 meet Development Code criteria to be classified as Heritage Trees, and 18 of those Heritage Trees are recommended for preservation. The Development Code defines heritage trees as "all eucalyptus windrows, any tree in excess of thirty feet (30') in height and having a single trunk with a diameter of twenty inches (20) or more, or a multi -trunk having a diameter of thirty inches (30") or more, a stand of trees the nature of which makes each dependent upon the others for survival, and any other tree as may be deemed historically or culturally significant because of age, size, condition, or aesthetic qualities." The Arborist Report evaluated the location and condition of 56 Coast Live Oak (Quercus agrifolia), 35 California Sycamore (Platanus racemosa), 26 California Pepper (Schinus molle), 24 Blue & Sugar Gum (Eucalyptus species), 15 Elderberry (Sambucus species), 12 Brazilian Pepper (Schinus terebinthifolia), 10 Evergreen Elm (Ulmus parvifolia), 7 Pine (Pinus species), and 13 miscellaneous trees, a total of 198 trees. The 180 trees not identified by the Arborist Report as suitable for preservation are considered over -mature, have poor growth character, have advanced decay, some are dead or are in poor general health; many of these trees have further declined in health due to the prolonged effects of the drought. Additionally, several trees, although in good health, their location conflicts with proposed improvements and the applicant proposes to remove these trees. The remaining 18 trees that meet Heritage Tree criteria are recommended for preservation due to their location, mature form, good growth character, and vigorous health; these trees are principally located north of the Sycamore Inn restaurant. Tree preservation priorities that should be considered include: 1) preserve -in-place healthy trees, 2) if trees cannot be preserved in place, then transplant elsewhere on-site, and as a last resort, 3) remove and replace with largest nursery grown stock available. Two of the trees proposed for removal are Coast Live Oak trees of "mature form and character, good vigor" (Borer Report, Trees No. 76 and 175) and their location conflicts with proposed improvements. Conditions of approval require the trees to be either transplanted elsewhere on-site or removed and replaced with the largest nursery grown stock available. The Conceptual Landscape Plan (Exhibit L) demonstrates that the 180 trees removed as part of this project will be replaced with a variety of 36 -inch box, 24 -inch box, and 15 -gallon size trees. Based on Development Code requirements for tree plantings (1 tree for each 3 parking spaces, 1 tree for each 30 feet of interior property line, 1 tree for each 30 feet of building subject to public view, and slope planting requirements) a significant number of tree plantings are required for the project site, and the Landscape Plan proposes planting trees throughout the project site to address this requirement. At the request of property owners to the north, a condition of approval has been included that required tree plantings, in size, species, and placement, do not impact views to the south. J. Neighborhood Meetings: Two neighborhood meetings were conducted to gather input and comments from the owners of the surrounding properties located within 660 feet of the P162 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2016-00206, SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, AND DRC2012-00673 — PACIFIC SUMMIT FOOTHILL, LLC August 23, 2017 Page 10 project site. These meetings were held at the Sycamore Inn on May 9, 2016 and February 1, 2017. Approximately 30 property owners attended the first meeting and approximately 35 property owners attended the second meeting. Similar questions were raised at both meetings and included questions regarding project access, parking, drainage, grading and site improvements, timing of construction, etc. The applicant provided an overview of the project and informed the residents of the project access from Foothill Boulevard, on-site parking for residents and guests, drainage improvements (for on-site and off-site improvements) proposed grading and slope design, overall site design and proposed improvements, the anticipated construction schedule, and how the project was designed to provide privacy to adjacent residences. Due to the time that has lapsed since the last Neighborhood Meeting, and to update the community, at the request of staff the applicant conducted a third Neighborhood meeting at Lions Center East on August 17, 2017. As this staff report was completed prior to the meeting staff will provide a summary of the meeting in the oral presentation to the Planning Commission. K. Design Review Committee: The project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (Macias, Wimberly, and Granger) on December 20, 2016 (Exhibit N). No major issues were discussed in the DRC Comments; however, several minor issues were addressed by the Committee and include: 1) provide additional parking spaces in the vicinity of the live/work units to ensure adequate parking is available for commercial uses; 2) provide a pedestrian connection to the Pacific Electric Trail along the east side of the project site; 3) provide additional landscaping adjacent to the project perimeter wall to the northwest of the Sycamore Inn; 4) utilize a tree species that protects the views of the homeowners living north of the project site; and 5) host an additional Neighborhood Meeting prior to scheduling the project for Planning Commission consideration. The first 4 items above were incorporated into the Conditions of Approval, the Neighborhood Meeting items were addressed in the discussion above. The Committee then recommended approval of the project to the Planning Commission. The Committee's recommendations have been incorporated in the Resolution of Approval, L. Senate Bill 18 and Assembly Bill 52 Compliance: As required by Senate Bill 18 (SB 18), the City submitted Tribal Consultation Requests for General Plan Amendment DRC2016-00206 to the Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians, the San Manual Band of Mission Indians, the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation, the Morongo Band of Mission Indians, the Serrano Nation of Mission Indians, the Gabrieleno/Tongva Nation, the Gabrieleno/Tongva San Gabriel Band of Mission Indians, and the San Fernando Band of Mission Indians. The notices were mailed on July 6, 2016 and provided for a 90 -day comment period ending on October 4, 2016. Of the 8 tribes who were notified, none submitted a response requesting consultation during the notification period. As required by Assembly Bill 52 (AB 52), the City submitted Tribal Consultation Requests to the Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians, the San Manual Band of Mission Indians, the San Gabriel Band of Mission Indians, and the Torres Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians following a completeness determination for Design Review DRC2012-00672. The notices were mailed on February 16, 2017 and provided for a 30 -day comment period ending on P163 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2016-00206, SUBTT16605M, .DRC201M0672, DRC2016-00207, AND DRC2012-00673 — PACIFIC SUMMIT FOOTHILL, LLC August 23, 2017 Page 11 March 20, 2017. No responses were received during this notification period; however, the San Manual Band of Mission Indians did respond on April 7, 2017 requesting consultation. Although the consultation request by the San Manual Band of Mission Indians was received after the end of the consultation period the City did honor their request and include their comments in the proposed mitigation measures. An additional notice was provided to the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation on May 17, 2017 following their AB 52 noticing request. On May 25, 2017 the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation responded with a request for consultation and their comments are included in the proposed mitigation measures. Should any undocumented archaeological or cultural resources be discovered during ground disturbing activities, adherence to the proposed mitigation measures will ensure that all impacts will be less than significant. M. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study (IS) of the potential environmental effects of the project (Exhibit P). Based on the findings contained in that IS, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures related to aesthetics, agricultural resources, air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, geology and soils, greenhouse gas emissions, hydrology and water quality, noise, and tribal cultural resources there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) was prepared and was circulated on July 3, 2017. A comment letter (Exhibit R) was received from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) on July 27, 2017 in response to the circulated IS/MND. The only comment CDFW had was in relation to the possible Jurisdictional Waters on the project site. The applicant and their biologists prepared a Jurisdictional Delineation to address CDFW's comments. The Jurisdictional Delineation determined that jurisdictional waters were not present on the project site, but recommended compliance with the CDFW recommended mitigation measure prior to issuance of any grading permit. The Biological Resources section of the ISIMND, was revised to include a mitigation measure requiring the applicant to provide proof to the City that the Streambed Alteration Agreement (1602 Agreement) process has been concluded. - According to CEQA Section 15073.5(a), recirculation of a negative declaration is required prior to its adoption when it has been substantially revised after public notice of its availability has been given pursuant to Section 15072. Furthermore, CEQA Section 15073.5(b) states, "a "substantial revision" of the negative declaration shall mean: (1) a new avoidable significant effect is identified and mitigation measure or project revisions must be added in order to reduce the effect to insignificance, or (2) the lead agency determines that the proposed mitigation measures or project revisions will not reduce potential effects to less than significance and new measures or revisions must be required." Here, either the CDFW will determine that notification under Section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code is required for the project, or they will require the applicant obtain a Streambed Alteration Agreement. The IS/MND was revised to include a discussion of the Jurisdictional Delineation for the project site and a mitigation measure requiring a Streambed Alteration Agreement was added to the MND and the project conditions of approval. The addition of a condition of approval requiring a Streambed Alteration Agreement is not considered substantial P164 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2016-00206, SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, AND DRC2012-00673 — PACIFIC SUMMIT FOOTHILL, LLC August 23, 2017 Page 12 evidence in light of the whole record that cannot be mitigated. Therefore, the Streambed Alteration Agreement mitigation measure is not a substantial revision to the MND, and recirculation of the MND is not required. FISCAL IMPACT: The project site currently is assessed an annual property tax. A percentage of this annual tax is shared with the City. The proposed development will increase the value of the project site and the City's annual share of the property tax will increase accordingly. The project proponent also will be responsible for paying one-time impact fees. These fees are intended to address the increased demand for City services due to the proposed project. The following types of services that these impact fees would support include the following: library services, transportation infrastructure, drainage infrastructure, animal services, police, parks, and community and recreation services. The overall project, during construction may increase construction -related employment and, following its completion, will increase employment due to new industrial uses, and may increase employment at surrounding existing and future businesses that will provide services to the employees and customers of the project. Also, a positive fiscal impact for the City will occur through increased sales tax revenue generated by the employees and customer patronage of local businesses. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Although a specific current City Council goal does not apply to the project, the project is consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan and the objectives of the Development Code. The proposed General Plan Amendment is consistent with the General Plan Public Health and Safety element and its policies related to hillside development. The proposed General Plan Amendment will not preclude the continued enforcement of the Hillside Development Guidelines applicable to development of property with slope conditions. The proposed project is in a developed area with similar hillside/slope conditions that will not be impacted by the project. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan as it identifies existing slope conditions and how the project integrates those conditions into its design, and proposed project is designed to minimize any impact to surrounding hillside developments. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660 -foot radius of the project site. One letter from Mr. Hank Stoy, a resident of the Red Hill area, was received in response to these public notifications. During the public comment period of the August 9, 2017 meeting, Mr. Stoy expressed concern regarding notification to the other residents of the continued hearing to the August 23, 2017 meeting date. In response, staff prepared and mailed a courtesy notice of the continued hearing for the August 23rd meeting. The mailing notice was incorporated with a notice announcing the Neighborhood Meeting scheduled for August 17, 2017. In addition to the courtesy notice, a newspaper advertisement was published on August 14, 2017 in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin and the project site was re -posted. P165 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC201•6-00206, SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, AND DRC2012-00673 — PACIFIC SUMMIT FOOTHILL, LLC August 23, 2017 Page 13 EXHIBITS: Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Exhibit. H Exhibit 1 Exhibit J Exhibit K Exhibit L Exhibit.M Exhibit N Exhibit 0 Exhibit P Exhibit Q Exhibit R Planning Commission Staff Report, dated August 9, 2017 General Plan Table LU -19 Slope Development Guidelines Development Code Chapter 17.52 Hillside Development Site Utilization Plan Site Plan - Illustrative Site Plan Parking Study Exhibit Tentative Tract Map Modification16605 - Conceptual Grading Plan Existing Slope Analysis Fire Access Plan - Conceptual Landscape Plan Floor Plans and Elevations Design Review Committee Comments and Action Agenda, December 20, 2107 Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration with, a location' map Initial Study (Parts I, II & I11) Mitigation Monitoring Program California Department of Fish and Wildlife letter dated July 27, 2017 Exhibit S - Hank Stay letterdated August 1, 2017 Draft Resolution Recommending Approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2016-00206 Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Tract Map Modification SUBTT16605M Draft Resolution of Approval for Design Review DRC2012-00672 Draft Resolution of Approval for Variance DRC2016-00207 Draft Resolution of Approval for Tree. Removal Permit DRC2012-00673 CB:TG/Is P166 P167 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 9, 2017 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Candyce Burnett, City Planner. Lt'i) INITIATED BY: Tom Grahn, Associate Planner SUBJECT: EXHIBIT A ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2016-00206 - PACIFIC SUMMIT FOOTHILL, LLC - A request to amend tables and text, including clarifying text as necessary, in the General Plan to allow the development of land that contains slopes of 30 percent or greater. Related files: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16605M, Design Review DRC2012- 00672, Variance DRC2016-00207, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2012-00673. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. This application will be forwarded to the City Council for final action. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP MODIFICATION SUBTT16605M - PACIFIC SUMMIT FOOTHILL. LLC - A request subdivide 24.19 acres into 6 parcels for the development of 175 condominium units in the Mixed Use (MU) District located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between Red Hill Country Club Drive and Pacific Electric Trail Right -of -Way; 207-101-13, 17, 24, 25. 31, 34, and 41 and 207-112-09 and 10, Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2016-00206, Design Review DRC2012-00672, Variance DRC2016-00207, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2012-00673. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2012-00672 - PACIFIC SUMMIT FOOTHILL, LLC - A request to develop 175 attached condominium units on 24.19 acres of land in Mixed Use (MU) District, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between Red Hill Country Club Drive and the Pacific Electric Trail Right -of -Way; APN: 207-101-13, 17, 24, 25. 31, 34, and 41 and 207-112-09 and 10. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2016-00206, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16605M, Variance DRC2016- 00207, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2012-00673. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VARIANCE DRC2016-00207 - PACIFIC SUMMIT FOOTHILL, LLC - A request to exceed the 30 foot building envelop established by Development Code Section 17.122.020.D.1,e.(i and ii) for the develop 175 attached condominium units on 24.19 acres of land in the Mixed Use (MU) District, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between Red Hill Country Club Drive and the Pacific Electric Trail Right -of -Way; APN: 207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 207-112-09 and 10. Related PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2016-00206, SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, AND DRC2012-00673 — PACIFIC SUMMIT FOOTHILL, LLC P168 August 9, 2017 Page 2 Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2016-00206, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16605M, Design Review DRC2012-00672, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2012-00673. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TREE REMOVAL PERMIT - DRC2012-00673 - PACIFIC SUMMIT FOOTHILL, LLC - A request to remove 188 trees associated with the proposed development of 175 attached condominium units on 24.19 acres of [and in Mixed Use (MU) District, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between Red Hill Country Club Drive and the Pacific Electric Trail Right -of -Way; APN: 207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 207-112-09 and 10. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2016-00206, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16605M, Design Review DRC2012-00672, and Variance DRC2016-00207. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that General Plan Amendment DRC2016-00206, Tentative Tract Map Modification SUBTT16605M, Design Review DRC2012-00672, Variance DRC2016-00207, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2012-00673 be continued to an unspecified date. The project applications will be re -advertised, noticed, and posted. CB:TG/Is Table LU -19: Slope Development Guidelines 5 or less 5 to 7.9 8 to 14.9 15 to 29.9 30 and over This is not a hillside condition. Grading with conventional, fully padded lots and terracing is acceptable. Development with grading is permitted in this zone, but existing landforms must retain their natural character. Padded building sites are permitted, however, techniques such as contour grading, combined slopes, limited cut and fill, and split level architecture, or padding for the structures only, may be required to reduce grading. When in conjunction with the techniques described above, and for a project within a master plan which includes special design features such as a golf course, extensive open space, or significant use of green belts or paseos, the Planning Commission may consider the use of mass grading techniques adjacent to these special design features as partial compliance with this standard. This is a hillside condition. Special hillside architectural and design techniques that minimize grading are required in this zone. Architectural prototypes are expected to conform to the natural landform by using techniques such as split level foundations of greater than 18 inches, stem walls, stacking and clustering. In conjunction with the alternative techniques described above, and for a project within a master plan which includes special design features such as a golf course, extensive open space or significant use of green belts or paseos, the Planning Commission may consider padded building sites adjacent to those special features when it is found that said grading creates a better relationship between that special design feature and the adjacent lots. Development within this zone is limited to no more than the less visually prominent slopes, and then only where it can be shown that safety, environmental and aesthetic impacts can be minimized. Use of larger lots, variable setbacks and variable building structural techniques such as stepped, or pole foundations are expected. Structures shall blend with the natural environment through their shape, materials, and colors. Impact of traffic and roadways is to be minimized by following natural contours, or using grade separations. This is an excessive slope condition and development is prohibited. The vision for the Hillside Focus Area includes: • Limit development to densities that do not exceed the capacity of the City to provide public services and adequate public safety or the capacity of the land; in particular, the City's ability to protect any new development from wildland and fires is a significant concern • Protect visually prominent natural landforms and other sensitive land resources ■ Protect natural resources and sensitive habitat • Provide opportunities to experience natural habitats through education programs for students and trail extensions ■ Maintain a natural "visual frame" for the northern edge of the City Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN EXHIBIT B L -612.307 P169 LU -47 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Article IV, Chapter 17.52 P170 Chapter 17.52 Sections: Section 17.52.010 Section 17.52.020 Section 17.52.030 Section 17.52.040 Section 17.52.050 Hillside Development Purpose and Applicability 17.52-1 Establishment of Slope Zoning Limitations 17.52-1 Density Limitations 17.52-2 Transfer of Development Credits 17.52-3 Transfer Process and Provisions 17.52-3 Section 17.52.010 Purpose and Applicability The purpose of this Chapter is to categorize hillsides into five slope categories and establish limits on land use density. Additional design standards and guidelines are provided in Article VII (Design Standards and Guidelines). The development and density limits established in this Chapter apply based on the location of property with five established slope zones (Section 17.52.020). Section 17.52.020 Establishment of Slope Zoning Limitations All property within Rancho Cucamonga can be categorized into one of the following slope zones. Regulations apply as indicated. A. Zone 1 (5% natural slope or less). This is not a hillside condition. Grading with conventional fully padded lots and terracing is acceptable. B. Slope Zone 2 (5% to 7.99% slope). Development with grading is permitted in this zone, but existing landforms must retain their natural character. Padded building sites are permitted; however, techniques such as contour grading, combined slopes, limited cut and fill, and split-level architectural prototypes, or padding for the structures only, may be required to reduce grading. C. Slope Zone 3 (8% to 14.9% slope). This is a hillside condition. Special hillside architectural and design techniques [see Article VII (Design Standards and Guidelines)] that minimize grading are required in this zone. Architectural prototypes are expected to conform to the natural landform by using techniques such as split- level foundations of greater than eighteen inches (18"), stern walls, stacking, and clustering. D. Slope Zone 4 (15% to 29.9%). Development within this zone is limited to no more than the less visually prominent slopes and then only where it can be shown that safety, environmental, and aesthetic impacts can be minimized. The use of larger lots, variable setbacks, and variable building structural techniques such as stepped or pole foundations are expected. Structures shall blend with the natural environment through their shape, materials, and colors. Impact of traffic and roadways is to be minimized by following natural contours or using grade separations. E. Slope Zone 5 (30% and over). This is an excessive slope condition and development is prohibited, unless all the following are satisfied: (i) the property is located south of Banyan Street; (ii) at least seventy-five percent (75%) of the lots or parcels that are the subject of the development application are surrounded by lots or parcels improved with structures; (iii) the proposed project is determined to appropriately address slope FL 12,311 EXHIBIT C 17.52-1 Article !V, Chapter 17.52 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code P171 stability and other geological factors of the site and (iv) vegetation fuel management for wildfire protection can be achieved and maintained. Section 17.52.030 Density Limitations This Section correlates the steepness of the terrain with limitations on development intensity. The total allowable residential dwelling units shall be calculated based on the total (buildable) land, area within each slope category multiplied by the capacity factor for each to the slope category. A. Using the Land Capacity Schedule. Table 17.52.030-1 (Land Capacity Schedule) converts the amount of gross site acres into the amount of net buildable acres based on slope measurement. TABLE 17.52.030-1 LAND CAPACITY SCHEDULE Slope Measurement . Acres of Land (Gross) Capacity Ratio Adjusted Net Buildable Area (Acres x Capacity Ratio) Under 10% A 1.000 Ax 10-14.9% B 0.750 Bx . 15-19.9% C0.500 Cx 20-24.9% 0 0.250 Dx 25-29.9% E 0.025 Ex +30% F 0.000 Fx Total (Ax+Bx+Cx+Dx+Ex+Fx) B. Calculating Permitted Units. The maximum number of dwelling units that may be permitted in a proposed development shall be determined by multiplying the total adjusted net buildable area (Ax+Sx+Cx+Dx+Ex+Fx) above by the permitted number of allowed units per acre according to the zoning district. C. Exceptions. The following land areas, meeting any or all of the following criteria, shall not be included in the calculation of total allowable dwelling units: 1. All land areas, regardless of slope, which will be subject to inundation during a 100 -year storm after development has occurred. 2. All land which is in a geologic hazard zone, as defined in the Public Health and Safety Chapter of the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and.for which no feasible mitigation measures are proposed. 3. All land area which lies within a federally recognized blue line stream or contains significant riparian or streambed environs. 4. All the following are satisfied: (1) the property is located south of Banyan Street; (ii) at least seventy-five percent (75%) of the lots or parcels that are the subject of the development application are surrounded by lots or parcels improved with 17.52-2 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Article IV, Chapter 17.52 P172 structures; (iii) the proposed project is determined to appropriately address slope stability and other geological factors of the site; and (iv) vegetation fuel management for wildfire protection can be achieved and maintained. Section 17.52.040 Transfer of Development Credits A development credit is a potential entitlement to construct one dwelling in a designated cluster area, which can only be exercised when the development credit has been transferred pursuant to the provisions of this Section from a donor to a receiver parcel and other requirements of law are fulfilled. A. Transfer Process. The allocation of dwelling units may be transferred from one parcel (donor) to another parcel (receiver) within a project site, or from a project site (donor) to adjacent properties (receiver), if conditions are applicable, when the development of the subject site would cause adverse impacts. The development per donor site/parcel shall be calculated according to Table, 17.52.030-1 (Land Capacity Schedule) and the result transferred to a predetermined receiver site/parcel. B. Development Agreement Required. The transfer of development credits is subject to a Development Agreement and/or any other appropriate legal agreement. The application shall designate both the donor and receiver parcels as part of the subject property. The Development Agreement, or any other appropriate agreement, shall be used to ensure the appropriate legal direction for completion of specific conditions and encourages public and private partnership. C. Planning Commission Authority. Development credits may be authorized when the Planning Commission finds that the receiver parcel has sufficient area to accommodate development otherwise permitted under City development districts plus the development credits to be transferred and that such total development meets all of the applicable requirements of the City's General Plan and all provisions of this Section. Section 17.52.050 Transfer Process and Provisions A. When development credits are transferred, all such credits are thereafter depleted with regard to the donor parcel. Excess development credits of that donor parcel, which are not initially transferred to a receiver parcel, may be subsequently transferred to another receiver parcel in accordance with the provisions of this Section. B. The number of development credits which may be transferred shall not exceed the number of dwelling units determined for the donor parcel through applying established adjusted net buildable area from the land capacity schedule and through preliminary site review to determine the actual number of units which could be developed on the donor parcel, subject to provisions contained within this Section. C. Approval of development credit transfers must be based on findings that this procedure is consistent with the General Plan and provides for the long-term maintenance of the property as open space. Analysis of the eventual maintenance of the open space shall be based upon the City's estimated annual cost for maintenance and liability for the land and for provisions thereof. 17.52-3 SITE UTILIZATION PLAN s t /'fir • \\ Lir- A':e' � .f k:' :.-i• • -I.. Ips yrs 041 p • r ?4 xi•i3/17 EXHIBIT D 41; _ / syt9 { 415, sr F — 4 �Y, r� p ' 7�1 .',6e,12,14''.., ! 01 i�I, , N k`r 1L , f_ \ -_ ` _ ! r _ ]yyL�-r 114'ri� uiy % v i*y7 j�R �Sil n. \Q s fl ! 1 o .`: - ma 00 a 6 SITE UTILIZATION PLAN Ve dN� e! xi 19 IF 02 2.1 Or- i r 4 lad 1 H 5 e 1 s tl a a 1 s EXHIBTE Q G- _27/23/17-- -- EXHIBIT F PC 2)/13/1/ Site Plan Illustrative Pacific Summit Foothill, LLC LlM CHANG ROHLING & ASSOCIATES DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES. INC TRG LAND. INC LANGAN ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES \ \ ' , • \ \ , \ \ ', , ., \ \ \ , ..‘ \,,,, '\ '..4. \ O \ \ \ k° .. \ , A \...1.; \ \ \ \ : \ V \ E.• \ 1 \ ti• A \ ° \ :!' ' • \ 0 \ ,• ,. ro. N . \ \` \ :, \ \ '\ .1 -=-_-----__. .... % ..-: r.: • \„ . \ A \ -,,. ..,,, 74.-01VP? J .9tTv Y ' 7 -OS., 4111s .L! H It mill ea 2 EXHIBIT G 0 (Q 111 Z 0 < 0 0 ° [t CI < 56 z cc < 2 al 0 m i0 2 Li < 0 0(2) CC r4 z zE n 0 0 CC 6 • Uo • 0 z LU 0 ...._:' ,.., .,.. ',-, •11 57T .1 1 1M Lou ' \,, I cr \ 1:! j '--• • .,,,,,„ 1 , i ;,-.•-.,. i...,„ , v.. -t--, , I .1, I I -YYL .10314 O -L 9Nr7 I-40,1111 , Z1= ) J if I 11,1 „y j0 , /77-- _ E • :014; / / = ru, 71_ I _ '1 \ ' : i-li,- •'-',' , ....- ..,.. , = _ = . - -,0 1 g , __-„--_-_----- / 'V. • ;• 5 ---j • ' 1 I EE 0 1 i / i 4 1 1 - - r ' 1 - : ,1 A- \ - - ,"Sli 1 V. I .. — .. , 1 • 0 —.0 '\ - J ; ,f 0 '.- i ,P-1 7.. !I . ]:•L H 7 21 _ / - ' Li li?, ! ,-. r ,._ _ . — , ,, n ,4,4 . , i 1 : ,:i; ;i; ll„,1::: LEL 1p_I L . 1/ - ,. ,,I, , ", ''g /54 2 '4 / — 1 , — ! 1 ., 3.1 — I 0 gi I . •I,s 0 , _ _ _ __ji _ ,....7 __ i5 ! 0 igi III q Ail 211 1 \ , i g r • / , V \ • \ 7 1 L . 4 . . i ! LEI0j, I 149 i I! Vi2 l'" \, \ , V!--, -e' ''''.-1 , 0 / / *--- /_ ___1 (--- .., ,...... ,-/ 7, ,-, / 0 -, \ \ 0 ::-/ .1 0,r — —I 1 1 • W , 1 104 ;°' 0 ol i2:3117 EXHIBIT H \ 7:1 4'71 / •\ \ • Lf 0 its 1— 0 gI I / I F I , ' I 1 5 2 1 h �1 i i;1 •■1 9 9 1. s it :� .`°x: 01 e n t Y� � A°3� aes Igo! gpe:� 1. X13 2.0 s�■ g!if l I I- iia lI11 SII itApi PP I- ii -•jai . 14 �41.2 di 21 ...,1 d al i 11 ■ie! —11 :1l -7b4gl Pgli Ap1�nj�n ii ° :�i 1111 1g:Mill iSe3:p ie y� a 3A CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN u7 O Q (A • (O • O z CD z a- o z < U U 3W 00 Z Q O wZ A Ar ggi1y 1 1 a III • 0E i p�s_iria 1 ¢ ?� H I3iabh hii-- gal 3e9�SIF ild:931lSSIIin; A5/SIGs, 1 8 3 8 1 1 1 8 8 2 1 ■ p g gg pp q 4' B P�1p e § p74g .E a �� 1 ;r 7 E b y�.Ig p' 11 1 I. 1p �p i' ° R " E 19 I [ g �1 NI 1 S E eC �S 35 xel g ] p �pbc . 8 1YS� ]A 11 tl g� eA� �i 8! ■ ■ : # S 1? !■ A o1 e S � NA ri. pi 111111 ;+3 rtre ia!■ M].Pi x � a 11i .iy i 31 a �3■e 101�°n ' @1 a 1H 1 p1 11 : r Ii �� ` 1 119h i9$1 i 1.■ Tg��R i `I' Ee �S �� 1 Ag� '_` 11 �•a✓58 ra?11 1/1 113- Mil �2 1y Lie! I a I Pei 6� tl � •9� } S ! be 3 r / ! C! 9! 8 p a 8 gg Si •ff ■ 0 j�r qq■' ] e yr g n 1 . S r ° �•� C i a 56 i s _ S ■ e tlP 9E p i EIS r i11 IQ 3SA i�1 i; ,� ` �i6 a s six 55 y0 >te�4 `S S 1 91 11 • q rgr: ^■: • .0 1 lig 5y e: ri 101 1 Apn 1 g i 1 1y 1 11A �� +8! e` . Ir 111 11 :` 1� �i r ��; ti. ga� i ig •Ii`gp 11 1i . � 11y 1°0 s pi g /pp �i 2 gL .1- ix p 1 A 12@ A� p-. ! s I1 g■ Gx g 1 leg ;i S �� 'e 7 S 11 � „ id [ ■i C: SP P■ S� 7 Q7� ° �p� r '� it 88 55,51 aS Baa 1 ? A 8 (1111-3 1 y1 ygi 1pi i� ll /� yp i . 1 r1A yl1 ; g P■ D �° Y 2 G�� r • r i■ h �a P� 1 Ve EE�iPi 64 �° 1 q �tr�9�� Yx1■ a1 N is A 9P1r s. 828 : 2� m1:1 I . ��1 a@ 1! �r r■ 1131 .!: 114- ,3 i xii A e �>i xi Al a x1 ii ■ xi m EXHIIEIT I X 4 a 8 4 8e Iii Sia 1 11 1 we - i 1 i5 °,111 l7 Rt z Ai J 851 428 i A r z O E U g9 m N� WO kN mp 704 INS 6 -44 F 0 U LX 6 . • , ett '0 00 UP 'g „_ 1- —11— — ., . IL ' 4' fir I'S • - • 03 1331 -IS Ora N11 1-101V74' I 1 ;I II/ *1 • , ,; 11 1 i LH o \ A 0 0 hh,h= h t • ah0105. 1.0A51 —1 h°. 0 0 • . / / 1 , / / r 3 1177-L ' EP „ • ,10 5 6 rA a.z 5 j 030_ uujz 8 i AI= War ER AVE I E n. 0 • : �• C a Rot 14' ONIOWN839 NVS dO AIN/100 • s. g 5 7 g �L m I i II; ; 3/ • - ; ; LITAI!! N \;, 111.1 gl \ I \ 0 - o ,0 0 9 2 I. 2 sa Fu "2 2 IQ th op • b b b b 6 b 6 d d d. 8 d 6 6 3 f3 00100.0 A, E 6 6 S a i x 6 : . T T R 6 T i T T a. it. 8 i. A d i 6 6 9 b^ a 6 9 'ST my h 0 '4'42 L7 ' W5- '68 V— F� 51z av Rt 1 < 6U a25 SaE as I I I = 3 ' MIME g 0 OM 'AJr3 00M-9NN A'3 00 00+9 VIS O:nm m eonns vis 111 OLSLiL q15 &� OPAS�Y q1A_ SSILZ1 nili 09000*£ a VOO E P' 090'9LI 9 600♦ A373 Aa c 07 .. 0-6 . CO OW tits ' _ f Aa 3 f3 00100.0 A, E 6 6 S a i x 6 : . T T R 6 T i T T a. it. 8 i. A d i 6 6 9 b^ a 6 9 'ST my h 0 '4'42 L7 ' W5- '68 V— F� 51z av Rt 1 < 6U a25 SaE as I I I = 3 ' P186 1 A4W/WRV'I'"" MtSTT - — — op000trap j I 71.7=2:0 ---11/ .• 4-Fter . -::•.- - -7. ,,,,04, i., ../ ,, G l•ulriTif -I ti. '-,4",/,4 r. . , ,,,9,_ ---• ..-- .,:ge, 41,17,4292 ' ,i 0\ ,-- q • 11 ----__APegii r I /ger p75 / — , au larii TIP' Emma opia: \l'Arti 41# INP. r:‘ ggrgE;,5.Egtili2 .75.45.44.744444TT -T TN° rAIRE I•11 -:-:- _ r_ I 3: Z.111-610RgenggIggiA .TYTYTTTTT_TT??TTT?fT r — _ MATCH LIN •—; 1- saaso?ae s" s i?o8s1a a ?C 44.444?444444449 4444' 1 B P187 Y ezg rn 44 I ' v Irk Y'g i! 0 z 0 ti rr 0 D [LP1 `1.49k 4444444444.4° 1'- --- — e N.A.q!aa!II sHPA :a 444 4444444°44494944 5 —7.171 ra m fq 1.j 11.41L11111 Y1111 113 '.���I —y--p—p- I-- Lk _._ - I_ 1F_4_ __ -4 _ 1 err _ y h 1 g'voi! rn EYi aft EG 68a ��s000 oe oB esti G6 o vee voce 000e o n 3111.3.1-91111. P188 cF) I i ! i - R Igti w.hEtMNEAFgag I'YTTT4TTT4T4TT4T - 4-4 - 14. F J 1111111 111 gE44UNREaEUEgn • -n • 7774 711 •- Et gt6.6gegtRItsSaal Nraggirng5g411e1 r T-7-4 T_TTTTT4TT Tt_ ?i __ .. —1 ---.• .41-.:-.;.,. .. 79 1 "--- '.a 1 2... — ?,y__i7_7___7–_ ,3 .. P I ---vr.4-._:._..._ H4,.... 1 Cv F.L1 .1 -q Tf“77.9./ uwec,�v ora\ ƒkr � .. of le! %—\ /\8§)\ /g -7� 1/HQQAl2Q\G\ �&. � 2 2sa.aaT, h2�R§g#g■ 77— g 5. } } 1' ;8R898|Rg52g5R Awd94NdRGddRd22 # < F 'iiMPLMUNIUP ; MaRrigg4V--. g go 'A- ga! _ -g _ _ urt • -- • 7 7- •_„ 6161616,16.5660.66666666686666 3""VIAPAElarAIMIaniUU rrHali 14,—y .4!, — -41u1!--4t J. — A grzMNIV- 4.35d136.538.133.3.333.33333 2e,0UFiEi41MgMAM,W2,1 N 1 I L2 I i lir CI) >- z LU 00 (r) 0 z 1= cn >7 i_u SYCAMORE HEIGHTS RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CA ?C 23 17 EXHIBIT J Ma EC iggV - " g - _ • - - - Ilft • 7 7- addE6Ide6.566d666606666.616:66 222"VIAPAElarAIMIaniUU 1;1;V9liRM =WM 4 3,1 61a 3.53 33343333333 2333"441244141244441444424 3 N I L2 I i r w C15 >- z LU 00 (1) 0 z 1-= cn >7 i_u SYCAMORE HEIGHTS RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CA L._ 2,3 17 EXHIBIT J • • •N\ \ \ N. \ P .7z = ,,! 1. nal OEM %LEN I; 17 1; �I d-Hd 133HS 01 3NI7 HaLVIN 11, rii. tG}9 ei0'G Q , �r77.--11 1[`"-71- ' eee'ekile I _ } r ! ,jale�4 eLQ -ul • . f .1 + , V r ` 1 i{1eleie IIILG0 E ) B,',,3 `f;3 i r 4 o •tea N.▪ 1 Q ul 4 1 DI _1 • I z . • 'I . Nx_• � .---- W —_ —1 •1 1 1 1 - ' ,•!�, • ~SJ` - r / 1 ai 1� •, , O; ere' I �3 4 1 z l li -,,,,,,s,___.-.; , 0/01 ,-'I ••f '•' f . if r' ,ill1/'--- , ! I UI i F•••—.... °_....---- l- gin': 9' I ,• 'r—,i r �/ • ! --- \y = '\ /`�\ 9 2 0 U LL Pc 423/17 EXHIBIT K , 8f.4 - r28 '°W Z A C3 a x .114 7 I • \ 11 / • \ ' \ \ t,'- , , \ 2 '\ \\ 7 \-7 •\ 1 t,\ \ \ , / ? i \ C-'` • \ ''\ ‘, ,,. ' \ t--`,'; , \ \ .„ . ‘ \ , \ \ , \ ,'.------- , ----'\ ‘\ , • •-,' 1 s ---,. ---- L\ ,„ ,..,., •,..:, •,.. , \ ,, • , 3,---- , g , g 9 ‘ \\ \ 1[9.41 kb3s1 .1.121 Mara MOW \ .\ A g •%\, \ ------N ' , ,, \, ._.. —, -------, - ' \ "..2--1----._ • / .% ' ...- \ 1., . .1..5'.. • ...- : .,,' ' . .,.. .4. . . • -. , . . . ,.. . .,.. . . f 11 ... Eit5r jj .,,,,k ,,,-- I 0:eIg '? ) •3 A N \ • \ . c.E1 •ii. \ ! \ 71! 1 A 1 I . I; i I • 9, e e e e e _• \ \, \ \ P i ,E13 I, 1 I f . 1. ! ; ,.., 1L_I- r• .:' 1; ---fl' •\•..- Q ",-_-1 ,---, I 1 -Ly.-.--, . ' 1 r— — — ' 1 —1.. 1c7—,17-7: 111 - 1i /--. -41)‘. 4. •;%! 1 , • le 9, 9, 9 e 9 9 ! ,--; -1,—.',, e% 9 = _ • \I II! .., 99999IJ , 11 11 ! I 1 _J...--..._1!_::.._,...., il, I m .. 1 ill I --!_F.,'EIT---71.' '-1 I I •.) 1 J,-1-17.-1C7—a771 / , '91,1 ! -e'ele!o , e e.ete +1! 111•16MimmoulaN 1 -. r 11 1 C.. ei3Oil@ Lfi!i@i6) _q3.4 - mem I =an 1,411 1. -ted 31\117FlaJ.WIt 49 • I] I \ o rj 4. 1'• v 4 • 4) CI r:J O 1111 TaSEEEEE a 00° Rte, ^ _ •0 ° Q '. -,6� 0 c • 0 • (65 CpQ 9a 11 1i 1 1111111"ilill '1 1s 111111111.:1:1111411113; 11 1 Ii0111 `111111 ,411; 1 q 41 0,41 a�I 1a;111411111 � �� 111111111N1 ,E ell 041 M7ra, ", 70",o raA ,- va i�ehaln EXHIBIT L PACIFIC SUMMIT FOOTHILL LLC SYCAMORE HEIGHTS C7 z a z a } pc. %/2.3/1-7 EXHIBIT M FOG �rSA C3 0 ^I el 0 G 0 amm o.o.Er. rn rtra .37 - 0 E. LOT COVERAGE ci) H zW 0 c>;) u --.. ;ii -1;--; i L . I+F -_- 1 w 1-r1 [ 'v :=� =b -3a - • IIIL�������A��WWW-IIII ,,o.mA r • M 0 z •a 1 f I 1 r — %may I s CD -0 x 1 . is L'�L'�%• f u 99C �s ar r-, illi ,`' m ni 5 e O dra a � li ilr- i Z V is b: 4 9 11r1 - I n CIE _J ..1 `I it _ rl"'- S1 MI ==tom 11 ,+y 0. 17 ; m I A rr a !! 0 1 ; 11 f Li n�-{ x I�ryy - -�- 1 C I I 15 ' m'� l R L-1 111111111111111111 ice- I'1 6O E.• ma 1 mi N jjii' O O . WI II II 9 1 __ a • } pc. %/2.3/1-7 EXHIBIT M FOG �rSA C3 0 ^I el 0 G 0 amm o.o.Er. rn rtra .37 - 0 E. LOT COVERAGE ci) H zW 0 c>;) u -- I+F -_- 1 w 1-r1 1 f I 1 r — %may I i9— 5 e O dra a � s II _ �l=isl py 9 I 0. 17 ; m I A 0 ; _ f Li n�-{ x e I - -�- 1 C 15 ' m'� l R off'`c ice- I'1 )_ O O . WI II II 9 IW'!!$li :;r L I .� �- S- III `-'�-- 1 m MINN R i a I 1�1111.� .A ■I■ r1 I I ' i.. } pc. %/2.3/1-7 EXHIBIT M FOG �rSA C3 0 ^I el 0 G 0 amm o.o.Er. rn rtra .37 - 0 E. LOT COVERAGE ci) H zW 0 c>;) u co z a c z J L L oma L z a ri 4 9 p4Y PLAN 3: SECOND FLOOR ELEVATION NOTES z +; / ± { / I id, 78 ° j |§ / \ \ ,;]/ §)2 ',( r(i �)§ §fir/i])1\§ \|}j)§/ ()fib§§P«§§!\ /N}I§#! ;§\!:!!e}:2 a:j�i1B 2333 32®29322 3 3y%\3y • 1 -4 Ma EC igg4V- - - I g z go 'A- ga! _ -g _ _ leg • •'- .14161666.5660.666606666866.6 2122'41AVAEIWAIMIaniUU 111;;3IiRM - ISEA =WM- 4 3,1 61a 3.5,!;342,33343333333 2 30"441244141244M444424, 3 \ \ ..153‘A \,, , :1,..,\)-s 4‘,/, : 1, :' 'lib II '.1. 1 .Kiti, • 2.-aol it ,..: r 1 17"1:1: 41J 1 • ip toe L gialf III logy, e !-.---w- ! 1.1 :( Akia/ 1 \,\ 1-111r, ' ,.. ..... • ii Ll • • I______ \ F .--.4 i I lir w CI) >— z LU 00 (r) 0 z 1= cn >7 i_u SYCAMORE HEIGHTS RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CA 2,3 17 EXHIBIT J 1 -4 3TMO b '4 7 - I g __ --- - - ILTAAUL — - - gm kg_ -g _ _ leg • - 6141616,16.5&60.6186066.5684/..1 2122'41AVAEIWAIMIaniUU 1111.4711;RM : A MTM=1- 4 3,1 61a 3.5,!;342,33343333333 2 30"4414441412444.414444 2 M 3 \ \ 111 ititg'.4.!.'q I :::, 6..4; 1. \ r\\.\, liii‘A \' 1 • 111, l'''‘4:i 1. .... .1 I: • 1,4iP logy, e !---- ,,,- i11 iili •. 1-.-- L gialf 111 1"1017er ' 1 . \\‘‘ [.....,__ iii-L-Lii L /-0- 4....1 I r ,---.4 ! i I N I L2 I i lir r CI) >- z LU 00 (r) 0 z 1= cn >7 i_u SYCAMORE HEIGHTS RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CA ?C 23 17 EXHIBIT J 1 ° �P.lg • • N. \ P 084: = VIM 09201 %LEN e- -S 17 R; �I :s:S 1,ri 1•@}9 ei0E• 1 L , I GjQ i 1iv]L�1-]� , ::-'-17.--11771L-71---1 ' eee'e4G } i jale�4` L, -nl El � r+;I Jr ` 1 i11e1eie i®0 0) e' -e?: 7 ',,3 `f;3 i { f. w O• i a i Q DI 4 i Zcz • '/' o �-- / --- _/ ' '!:' G) 9"9 9 l fiF--; ,� 1 `� s ,� ,�/ `y I q! il �4-- I G51-021' 5102 3 I'•l •-l•-- i f , ,! / I El! i F•••—.... °_....---- l- gin': 9' I i- �� 'ti's 1 ' ` r41 f /-- 1 ------------ v ,f 1 --- .r 1\ `\ . 14 X— \ '\ \ 9 7 Pc 423/17 EXHIBIT K \ • , Ei x 1 5 I FE m 1 '1 1 1 .i . 0 /\ 2 \ \ \ \ 1, \ \ ill , ,7 \ \ ,c.' \-7 \ , • V, , •'.,, \ \ .7.:.--j--t-L_Z-„, \ , \ 1 -',', t 0 \ \\ /, r •V'‘ 1 / , \ \ \ ,‘ •\ . - \ \ \ ''; 1„, \\ \ , \ ,\\ , \ \:,...--- \ ----' ', \ , \ \ \ , ,- •:,.\, ',,, ------ ', ,...i ,;.: ` 1[9.41 kb3s1 tela121 MOM ,• 1 .. A • -, i). A k 9 \\---------- `\ \\ 1 \J....._,..---\; ,,, s ' \---- ,..... \ _.---- \ • ....., ---T---", - v 1 \ ' -..t. \\1: \,,\ C \ \ ? 1. 1 .:‘ ...----- "..2•.--1----,_ • / •‘ ‘ lj -'-,— — - --- ...• / ',.-r\ \\ r\ ...- \ :,,,,.. •, ,,,,. ,-• __..... ,• ., i, , A .•., ,_„.• •...„ \.. .... , , , , __:•,,,,___., .., \ .... ... ,, ••• Lla j . , A,,,, •_1 A . c....:,' \ oz, I --',.., , -6', ,••• I, ., ,.., ,\ , ‘ \ ::'- 1 A 1 \.—_—• i ,.... , 6 \ \ ‘ 1 I" 1 OM 1 4 I I 1 I". . I 1 I I Z1 FL:17.."---Tr-''VI-711 \ , Q — . 1 I 1 1 71 ---1 .//7.5L;N•7:,:: \ .-1". H-11' C-•' , , e% \ I 1., i, • i• 9 , 9 , 9 e 9 9 €.• - 4!. ! r—; -11-1‘.1•:k CT Tle,' 1 . 9 . 999991J I s • I ' , I Iili •,:_Li'i-.1.1, , , ; '-'----1 •ED ' rn 11 , i 1 1 ); •1476 I. -71--Ca • • • • .-...,...,_ ,_ ..., ..,_ • , J: --•-• ;•-4 ) I : tA1,_9_, 1--- , 1 17.j)JiL..Lt_Iji ,L'EE 1- , i ' 9.1.13_15_6( ,1 • ••••' • ! ) -e'ele!Pa , +1! ; 111•1116Mionsui0M 1 4. 1'• 4 r' r:J O 9a c 0= -ice 0.a +Arai ° i�ehaln EXHIBIT L 1111 TaSEEEEE efiqg �3 11 1i 1 1111111"ilill '1 1s 111111111.:1:1111411113; 11 1 Ii0111 `111111 Id 411; 1 q 41 0,41 a�I 1111114111!1 �� 111111111N1 la 11 1151111° 1i 11111111h1" �Wii11111111/fiIr1 - PACIFIC SUMMIT FOOTHILL LLC SYCAMORE HEIGHTS C7 z a z a } pc. %/2.3/1-7 EXHIBIT M FOG �rSA C3 0 ^I el 0 G 0 amm o.o.Er. rn tra .37 0 E. LOT COVERAGE ci) H zW 0 c>;) u --.. ;ii -1;--; i L . 1+F -_- 1 w 1-r1 [ 'v :=� =b -3a - • IIIL�������A��WWW-IIII ,,o.mA r • M 0 z •a 1 f I 1 r — %may I s CD -0 x 1 . is L'�L'�%• f u 99C �s ar r-, illi ,`' m ni 5 e O dra a � li ilr- i Z V is b: 4 9 11r1 - I n CIE _J ..1 `I it _ rl"'- S1 MI ==tom 11 Q da® ,+y -: 0. 17 ; m I A rr a !! .{rte, -- - -a 111 f Li n�-{ x I�ryy - -�- 1 C I I 15 ' m'� l R L-1 111111111111111111 ice- I'1 6O E.• ma 1 mi N jjii' O O . WI II II 9 1 __ a • } pc. %/2.3/1-7 EXHIBIT M FOG �rSA C3 0 ^I el 0 G 0 amm o.o.Er. rn tra .37 0 E. LOT COVERAGE ci) H zW 0 c>;) u -- 1+F -_- 1 w 1-r1 1 f I 1 r — %may I i9— 5 e O dra a � s II _ �l=isl py 9 I Q da® 4 0. 17 ; m I A 0 ; _ f Li n�-{ x e I - -�- 1 C 15 ' m'� l R off'`c ice- I'1 )_ O O . WI II II 9 IW'!!$li :;r L I .� �- S- III `-'�-- 1 m MINN R i a I 1�1111.� .A ■I■ r1 I I ' i.. } pc. %/2.3/1-7 EXHIBIT M FOG �rSA C3 0 ^I el 0 G 0 amm o.o.Er. rn tra .37 0 E. LOT COVERAGE ci) H zW 0 c>;) u co z a c z J L L L z a z ri 4 9 p4Y PLAN 3: SECOND FLOOR ELEVATION NOTES • : / 1 id, 78 ° \� fi\/|§j \ ( (. ]/§)2 ' �§§fi;r/])\,r}) ji§1§ \| )§/ )b§P«§§!\/N}§#!(;\!:!!e}:2 a:jIi1B 2333 32®29322 3 3y%\3y - / m { • ELEVATION NOTES • ELEVATION NOTES ti r 4 4 n ti f 6. 7.i I 11.J . w 5 i.,-, 4 1 ,... a —r 4,1 . y J fria,-.4404-ewee. me kv a< 5 ''G L__ r7* .4 .1 I f 44 ',4 0. ELEVATION NOTE 0 U 0 4.4 4-4 U� 4� = c;)4 cc$ az ELEVATION NOTES m 04 s f If- , F-717^ 0 U 1a n • m 3 c U 0 0 0. or, cd- 4 0 0 C.. crl 01 En 0 u- u -4'!W C7 rl C.) ncac+o��o Z^ r 2O PUN 9A: FIRST FLOOR PLAN 9A! SECOND FLOOR PIAN 3A: THIRD FLOOR iy M1 Olg V1 H z z U 211 REAR ELEVATION z 0 rw w 0 vin r, H nmit Foothill, LLC 0 0 Q U 3 0 0 Gr. Gr..G.Gr.. • C".. Cs. fn in CO CR mmil l[- FRONT ELEVATION 4 4a0 tbhdailh e % ttp?�¢¢11; 311 p� � y# �,dd gS gg ��• &:g 6i p p Sat"r�3�ie3°s ;11 ES B 3 3- tg el sa 1 er :t :! Y el ti aI 1111”111'ii1 ill u7 EXTERIOR DOOR HEAD -INSWING EXTERIOR DOOR HEAD -INSWING C7 0 ti 0 z 5 a ;� t , t Y 41tp?Mt MI I sill $ yggg$giii q to 11 ei CCpap 141WHIN4;1 di EXTERIOR DOORJAMB -INSWING 0 EXTERIOR DOOR JAMB -INSWING RECESSED WINDOW HEAD P a sr �eF eartrilati esa77lhlt; l h r 11 a S a � p133 ! 11 di Hit !ti soil ti 13 WINDOW SILL RECESSED WINDOW HEAD 47 WINDOW SILL �; gr sib = BO t Pi Ai da �F 1 13 AV; 414 si 1E 121 111 &.s 14 CO SLOPED WINDOW SILL RECESSED WINDOW SILL EXTERIOR DOOR SILL Lii 2.1 P226 RANC110 CUCAMONGA THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTION AGENDA DECEMBER 20, 2016 - 7:00 P.M. Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Rains Room 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER 1 Roll Call Regular Members: Ray Wimberly X Rich Macias X Candyce Burnett Donald Granger X Alternates: Lou Munoz Rich Fletcher Francisco Oaxaca Additional Staff Present: Tom Grahn. Associate Planner II. PUBLIC COMMENT This is the time and place for the general public to address the Committee. State law prohibits the Committee from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Committee may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are limited to five minutes per individual. III. PROJECT REVIEW ITEMS The following items will be presented by the applicant and/or their representatives. Each presentation and resulting period of Committee comment is limited to 20 minutes. Following each presentation, the Committee will address major issues and make recommendations with respect to the project proposal. The Design Review Committee acts as an advisory Committee to the Planning Commission. Their recommendations will be forwarded to the Planning Commission as applicable. The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Committee may open the meeting for public input. 7:00 p.m. None 1 of 3 Pc/2a/j7EXHI4I7 N P227 RANCHO CUCAMONGA DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTION AGENDA DECEMBER 20, 2016 A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2016-00206 - PACIFIC SUMMIT FOOTHILL, LLC - A request to amend the General Plan to allow the development of land that contains a 30 percent slope in the Mixed Use (MU) District, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between Red Hill Country Club Drive and the Pacific Electric Trail; APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112- 09 and 10. Related Files: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16605M, Design Review DRC2012-00672, Variance DRC2016-00207, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2012-00673. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. This application will be forwarded to the City Council for final action. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16605M - PACIFIC SUMMIT FOOTHILL, LLC - A request to subdivide 24.19 acres into 6 parcels for the development of 175 attached condominium units in the Mixed Use (MU) District located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between Red Hill Country Club Drive and Pacific Electric Trail Right -of -Way; 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2016- 00206, Design Review DRC2012-00672, Variance DRC2016-00207, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2012-00673. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2012- 00672 - PACIFIC SUMMIT FOOTHILL, LLC - A request to develop 175 attached condominium units on 24.19 acres of land in the Mixed Use (MU) District, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between Red Hill Country Club Drive and the Pacific Electric Trail Right -of -Way; APN: 0207- 101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2016-00206, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16605M, Variance DRC2016-00207, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2012-00673. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VARIANCE DRC2016-00207 - PACIFIC SUMMIT FOOTHILL, LLC - A request to exceed the 30 -foot building envelope established by Development Code Section A. DRC2016-00672 - Committee recommended approval of the proposed project subject to the following revisions: Provide additional parking spaces in the vicinity of the Live/Work units to ensure adequate parking is available for commercial uses. Provide a pedestrian connection to the Pacific Electric Trail along the east side of the project site. Provide additional landscaping adjacent to the project perimeter wall to the northwest of the Sycamore inn. Utilize a tree species and spacing that protects the views of homeowners living north of the project site. Host an additional 2 of 3 P228 RANcao CUCAMONGA DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTION AGENDA DECEMBER 20, 2016 17.122.020.D.1.e.(i and ii) for the development of 175 attached condominium units on 24.19 acres of land in the Mixed Use (MU) District, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between Red Hill Country Club Drive and the Pacific Electric Trail Right -of -Way; APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2016-00206, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16605M, Design Review DRC2012-00672, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2012-00673. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TREE REMOVAL PERMIT - DRC2012-00673 - PACIFIC SUMMIT FOOTHILL, LLC - A request to remove 188 trees associated with the proposed development of 175 attached condominium units on 24.19 acres of land in the Mixed Use (MU) District, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between Red Hill Country Club Drive and the Pacific Electric Trail Right -of -Way; APN: 0207- 101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2016-00206, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16605M, Design Review DRC2012-00672, and Variance DRC2016-00207. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. IV. ADJOURNMENT The Design Review Committee has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11:00 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Committee. Neighborhood Meeting prior to scheduling the project for Planning Commission consideration. I8:04 p m, I, Jennifer Palacios, Office Specialist 11 with the Planning Department far the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on December 8, 2016, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. 3 of 3 7:00 p.m. DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS P229 Tom Grahn December 20, 2016 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2016-00206 - PACIFIC SUMMIT FOOTHILL, LLC - A request to amend the General Plan to allow the development of land that contains a 30 percent slope in the Mixed Use (MU) District, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between Red Hill Country Club Drive and the Pacific Electric Trail; APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10. Related Files: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16605M, Design Review DRC2012-00672, Variance DRC2016- 00207, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2012-Q0673. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. This application will be forwarded to the City Council for final action. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16605M - PACIFIC SUMMIT FOOTHILL, LLC - A request to subdivide 24.19 acres into 6 parcels for the development of 175 attached condominium units in the Mixed Use (MU) District located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between Red Hill Country Club Drive and Pacific Electric Trail Right -of -Way; 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2016-00206, Design Review DRC2012-00672, Variance DRC2016-00207, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2012-00673. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2012-00672 - PACIFIC SUMMIT FOOTHILL, LLC - A request to develop 175 attached condominium units on 24.19 acres of land in the Mixed Use (MU) District, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between Red Hill Country Club Drive and the Pacific Electric Trail Right -of -Way; APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10. Related Files: General- Plan Amendment DRC2016-00206, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16605M, Variance DRC2016-00207, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2012-00673. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VARIANCE DRC2016-00207 - PACIFIC SUMMIT FOOTHILL, LLC - A request to exceed the 30 -foot building envelope established by Development Code Section 17.122.020.D.1.e.(i and ii) for the development of 175 attached condominium units on 24.19 acres of land in the Mixed Use (MU) District, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between Red Hill Country Club Drive and the Pacific Electric Trail Right -of -Way; APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2016-00206, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16605M, Design Review DRC2012- 00672, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2012-00673. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TREE REMOVAL PERMIT - DRC2012-00673 - PACIFIC SUMMIT FOOTHILL, LLC - A request to remove 188 trees associated with the proposed development of 175 attached condominium units on 24.19 acres of land in the Mixed Use (MU) District, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between Red Hill Country Club Drive and the Pacific Electric Trail Right -of -Way; APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207- 112-09 and 10. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2016-00206, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16605M, Design Review DRC2012-00672, and Variance DRC2016-00207. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. P230 DRC COMMENTS GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2016-00206, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16605M, DESIGN REVIEW DRC2012-00672, VARIANCE DRC2016-00207 & TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2012-00673 — PACIFIC SUMMIT FOOTHILL, LLC. December 20, 2016 Page 2 Background: On April 12, 2006 the Planning Commission took the following actions related to previous entitlement applications to develop the project site: • Recommended to the City Council approval of the following: o General Plan Amendment DRC2004-00339 — A request to amend the General Plan to allow the development of land that contains a 30 percent slope. o Development Code Amendment DRC2004-00352 — A request to amend the Development Code to allow the development of the land that contains a 30 percent slope. • Approved the following applications contingent upon City Council approval of the above applications: o Tentative Tract 16605 -- A residential subdivision of 8 lots for condominium purposes (206 units) on 21 acres of land. o Design Review DRC2003-00637 — The design review of building elevations and detailed site plan for 206 condominiums on 21 acres of land. o Variance DRC2005-01061 — A request to reduce the parking lot setback from 45 feet minimum to 10 feet to allow improvements to an existing parking lot for the Sycamore Inn Restaurant. o Minor Development Review DRC2004-00826 — Parking lot, loading area modifications and covered patio area at the Historic Sycamore Inn Restaurant. On June 21, 2006, the City Council subsequently approved the General Plan and Development Code Amendment applications. Development Code Amendment DRC2004-00352 was incorporated into Development Code Section 17.52.020(E) thereby providing an exception to the prohibition of development on slopes 30 percent and over, provided certain conditions are satisfied. General Plan Amendment DRC2004-00339 was not incorporated into the 2010 General Plan Update. The entitlement applications related to the Tentative Tract (Le., Design Review DRC2003-00637, Variance DRC2005-01061, and Minor Development Review DRC2004-00826) expired on April 6, 2011. No time extensions for these applications were requested or granted; however, on March 23, 2016, the Planning Commission approved a 1 -year time extension (DRC2015-01110) request for SUBTT16605 thereby extending the expiration date of SUBTT16605 to April 12, 2017. Design Parameters: The project site is located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between San Bernardino Road and Baker Avenue in a hillside area on the southerly flank of Red Hill and surrounding the historic Sycamore Inn restaurant. The project site land use designation is the Mixed Use (MU) District. The property to the north contains the Red Hill Condominiums in the Medium (M) Residential District, vacant lots in the Low (L) Residential District, and the Red Hill Country Club and golf course in the Low (L) Residential District. The property to the west contains residential and commercial uses in the Mixed Use (MU) District. The property to the east is the Pacific Electric Trail, the Route 66 Trailhead, and residential uses across Foothill Boulevard in the Medium (M) Residential District. The property to the south, across Foothill Boulevard, includes P231 DRC COMMENTS GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2016-00206, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16605M, DESIGN REVIEW DRC2012-00672, VARIANCE DRC2016-00207 & TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2012-00673 — PACIFIC SUMMIT FOOTHILL, LLC. December 20, 2016 Page 3 residential and commercial land uses in the Medium (M) Residential District and the Mixed Use (MU) District. The project site is predominately vacant, but includes one restaurant use to the west of the Sycamore Inn. The current proposal provides one access point for a right -in -right -out driveway west of the Sycamore Inn. The current proposal differs from the previously approved project site plan in that the project now surrounds the Sycamore Inn rather than taking access directly through the signalized access to the Sycamore Inn site. A majority of the site has been disturbed and replanted with non-native species; however, there are numerous mature trees located predominately in the northwestern portion of the project site. The project site contains 198 trees, 64 of which meet Development Code criteria as Heritage Trees, and 15 of those Heritage Trees were recommended for preservation by the arborist's report (these trees are predominately Coast Live Oak and California Sycamore Trees) and the project site plan. Site features include a large, concrete reservoir facility (abandoned and partially demolished), a restaurant building (associated with the Red Chief Motel), and parking lot area of the previously demolished Red Chief Motel. Significant visual features that frame the site are the historic Sycamore Inn, the Red Hill Bluff to the north, and the Pacific Electric Trail to the south and east. A significant design challenge for the project site is the steep topography; approximately 28.3 percent of the site is sloped 30 percent and greater. As noted above, the Development Code Amendment to permit development on slopes greater than 30 percent was incorporated into the 2012 Development Code update; however, the previous General Plan Amendment was not incorporated into the 2010 General Plan Update. To address this limitation, the applicant submitted a General Plan Amendment to amend General Plan Policy PS -6.1, which Would continue to prohibit development on slopes that exceed 30 percent unless all the following are satisfied: (i) the property is located south of Banyan Street; (ii) at least 75 percent of the lots or parcels that are the subject of the development application are surrounded by lots or parcels improved with structures; and (iii) the proposed project is determined to appropriately address slope stability and other geological factors of the site. A Historical Assessment of the Project Site was provided for the previously approved project. That assessment identified the following as a result of research and field survey: 1) the Cucamonga Stage station site, 2) Sycamore Inn, 3) Red Chief Motel, and 4) The presence of two previously recorded historic bridges (CHS -1786-1 and CHS -1786-6) as well as the old Los Angeles to San Bernardino Road route (PS -BR -3-H) adjacent to the project boundaries as noted by The San Bernardino Museum Archaeological Information Center. At that time, these resources were all outside the project area and were not impacted by the project. The Sycamore Inn site was affected on a site-specific impact, since the main access to the residential project was through a signalized intersection into the Sycamore Inn parking lot. The redesign of the project site around the Sycamore Inn has removed this impact and the historical integrity of this unique historical resource will not be adversely affected. The bridge and road route were addressed through the development of the Pacific Electric Trail bridge and the Route 66 Trailhead. A Cultural Resources Assessment (August 27, 2012) was prepared to evaluate the Red Chief Motel site, which concluded that the removal of the original complex and the alterations to the remaining structure (the restaurant west of the Sycamore Inn) no longer conveys its significance or association with Route 66, and neither the grounds or the site meet the minimum criteria for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources or as a local landmark. The site plan wraps around the Sycamore Inn restaurant providing a single right -in -right -out driveway entrance to the site. A secondary Emergency Vehicle Access driveway provides access to and from Red Hill Country Club on the northwest portion of the site. A total of 9 live/work units are provided adjacent to the Foothill Boulevard driveway, with adjacent parking and pedestrian P232 DRC COMMENTS GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2016-00206, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16605M, DESIGN REVIEW DRC2012-00672, VARIANCE DRC2016-00207 & TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2012-00673 — PACIFIC SUMMIT FOOTHILL, LLC. December 20, 2016 Page 4 access. Units are provided throughout the 24 -acre site, with most units situated east of the Sycamore Inn on two large relatively flat graded pads. Units directly adjacent to Foothill Boulevard are approximately 6 to 21 feet above the existing street grade, and a large 30 -foot high Mechanically Stabilized Embankment (MSE) retaining wall separates the lower and upper building pads. Building pads are located throughout the project site and are situated so that their eventual development will minimize impacts to adjacent properties. The 175 units are provided throughout the project site in 44 individual buildings containing between 3 and 6 residential units each. Units are provided in either a two-story or three-story building complex. The two-story units range in size from 1,296 square feet to 1,701 square feet and the three-story units range in size from 1,672 square feet to 2,083 square feet. Architectural styles include Santa Barbara and Provence and include 360 degree architectural elements such as: tile roofs, stucco finish, multi -paned windows, metal balconies, wood shutters, and additional architectural embellishments. The two-story buildings are approximately 28 feet high and the three-story buildings are approximately 35 feet high. Because of the site topography the project is located within the Hillside Overlay District, which establishes a 30 -foot high building envelope for all structures. This standard typically applies to the development of a single-family house where the structure is designed to follow the finish grade; however, because significant grading is proposed that essentially creates two large flat building pads the applicant has submitted a Variance to exceed the 30 -foot high building envelope for the three-story units. Developments consisting of 101 units to 200 units shall provide 5 recreational amenities. The proposed project exceeds this requirement by providing a large recreational area with pool and spa, 2 large tot -lots, and 5 barbeque areas with surrounding open space. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Mafor Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project. 1. General Plan Amendment — The proposed GPA is. consistent with the previously approved amendment and the adopted Development Code standards for grading on slopes 30 percent and greater. 2. View Protection — As an infill, hillside site, consideration and sensitivity to the protection of neighbor's views is critical. The applicant has provided sections at various locations throughout the .project site to demonstrate the relationship of the proposed project to the surrounding properties. 3. Grading — A significant amount of grading is proposed to make development of the project site feasible. The MSE retaining wall is a unique feature to this project site and outside of the 210 -Freeway right-of-way has not been utilized in the City. 4. Architecture — The project architecture is designed to reflect 360 degree architectural treatment. The proposed units are well designed and the architectural elaboration for each unit is consistent with its proposed architectural style. 5. Building Height — The 35 -foot building height of the three-story units should be considered in relation to the limitations and intent of the Hillside Overlay District. P233 DRC COMMENTS GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2016-00206, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16605M, DESIGN REVIEW DRC2012-00672, VARIANCE DRC2016-00207 & TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2012-00673 — PACIFIC SUMMIT FOOTHILL, LLC. December 20, 2016 Page 5 6. Tree Preservation — The site contains 198 trees on-site, including Oak, Sycamore, Pepper, Elm, and Eucalyptus Trees. An Arborist Report (Jim Borer, August 2, 2012) identifies that most of these trees are over -mature, have poor growth character, have advanced decay, and are in poor general health; many trees have further declined in health due to the continued effects of the drought. The Arborist Report identifies that 64 of these trees meet Development Code criteria as Heritage Trees, and 15 of those Heritage Trees are recommended for preservation due to their mature form, good growth character, vigorous health; most of these trees are situated to the north of the Sycamore Inn restaurant. The tree preservation priorities should be considered: 1) preserve -in-place healthy trees, 2) if trees cannot be preserved in place, then transplant elsewhere on-site, and as a last resort, 3) remove and replace with largest nursery grown stock available. The developer is proposing to plant numerous new trees, ranging from 15 -gallon to 36 -inch box sized specimens. 7. Neighborhood Meeting — Prior to scheduling this application for Design Review Committee consideration the applicant conducted a Neighborhood Meeting on May 9, 2016 and approximately 22 individuals attended the meeting. Those in attendance questioned the protection of existing views relative to buildings, fencing, and landscaping, the size and pricing of units, the timing of construction, vehicle parking, both driveway and recreational vehicles, traffic impacts, grading, erosion, emergency vehicle access, and the number of school -aged children in the project. The applicant's team responded to each question and addressed the concerns of those in attendance. Staff has requested that the applicant conduct 1 additional Neighborhood Meeting prior to scheduling the project for Planning Commission consideration. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues. 1. Pacific Electric Trail Connection — Provide a pedestrian connection from the project site to the Pacific Electric Trail. Contact the San Bernardino Associated Governments for approval. Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion. 1. No policy issues have been identified. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends the Committee recommend approval of the proposed project. Design Review Committee Action: Committee recommended approval of the proposed project subject to the following revisions: • Provide additional parking spaces in the vicinity of the Live/Work units to ensure adequate parking is available for commercial uses. • Provide a pedestrian connection to the Pacific Electric Trail along the east side of the project site, • Provide additional landscaping adjacent to the project perimeter wall to the northwest of the Sycamore Inn. • Utilize a tree species and spacing that protects the views of homeowners living north of the project site. P234 DRC COMMENTS GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2016-00206, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16605M, DESIGN REVIEW DRC2012-00672, VARIANCE DRC2016-00207 & TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2012-00673 — PACIFIC SUMMIT FOOTHILL, LLC. December 20, 2016 Page 6 • Host an additional Neighborhood Meeting prior to scheduling the project for Planning Commission consideration. Staff Planner: Tom Grahn, Associate Planner Members Present: Commissioner Ray Wimberly; Commissioner Rich Macias; Senior Planner Donald Granger P235 City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Mitigated Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: General Plan Amendment DRC2016-00206, Tentative Tract Map Modification SUBTT16605M, Design Review DRC2012-00672, Variance DRC2016-00207, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2012-00673. Public Review Period Closes: August 9, 2017 Project Name: Sycamore Heights Project Applicant: Chad Stadnicki Pacific Summit -Foothill, LLC 212 S. Palm Avenue, 2nd Floor Alhambra, CA 91801 Project Location (also see attached map): The project site is located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between San Bernardino Road and Baker Avenue in a hillside area on the southerly flank of Red Hill and surrounding the historic Sycamore Inn restaurant. Project Description: The applicant, Pacific Summit -Foothill, LLC, proposes an amendment to the General Plan to revise tables and text, including clarifying text as necessary to allow the development of land that contains slopes of 30 percent or greater, a Tentative Tract Map to subdivide a property of 24.19 acres into 6 parcels, and a Design Review for the development of 175 condominium units (including 9 live -work units) located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between Red Hill Country Club Drive and the Pacific Electric Trail. FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initia! Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Mitigated Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but: (1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project, as revised, may have a significant effect on the environment. If adopted, the Mitigated Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Reportwill not be required. The factual and analytical basis for this finding is included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration during the review period. Date of Determination Adopted By f 2/-2-3b7 FXHIRIT [l P236 IIINIMINIS 1,1[ SGS u s M..Pl. T lT o+" TNL IrRERiOP t7R7�] u s GECk3 1u..5a rt, .a. w MND/• :1USTop G'11 QUAGRAYOLE CAL*11.11..1 P237 .dhLM J..1w xan.1+a4grfn..r WAST!, LA smi CilyofRancho Cucamonga Arann[ng Depanmeni 909) 477.2750 -t ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (Part 1 - Initial Study) (Please type or print clearly using Ink. Use the tab key to move from one line to the next line J Print Form The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed project so that the City may review the project pursuant to City Policies, Ordinances, and Guidelines; the California Environmental Quality Act; and the City's Rules and Procedures to Implement CEQA. It is important that the information requested in this application be provided in full. Upon review of the completed Initial Study Part I and the development application, additional information such as, but not limited to, traffic, noise, biological, drainage, and geological reports may be required. The project application will not be deemed complete unless the identified special studies/reports are submitted for review and accepted as complete and adequate. The project application will not be scheduled for Committees' review unless all required reports are submitted and deemed complete for staff to prepare the Initial Study Part 11 as required by CEQA. In addition to the filing fee, the applicant will be responsible to pay or reimburse the City, its agents, officers, and/or consultants for all costs for the preparation, review, analysis, recommendations, mitigations, etc., of any special studies or reports. GENERAL INFORMATION: INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED. Please note that it is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the application is complete at the time of submittal; City staff will not be available to perform work required to provide missing information. Application Number for the project to which this farm pertains: Project Title: Sycamore Heights Name & Address of project owner(s): Pacific Summit.f=oothill, LLC 212 S. Palm Avenue, 2nd Floor Alhambra, CA 91801 Name 8 Address of developer or project sponsor: Same Contact Person & Address: Chad Stadnickf 1.1PLANNINGIFINALIFORMSICOUNTEtiltnitial Study Partl.doc Page 1 of 10 PC_ $12317 EXHIBIT P 8 P239 212 S. Palm Avenue, 2nd Floor Alhambra, CA 91801 Name & Address of person preparing this form (if different from above): Telephone Number:626.282.3100 PROJECT INFORMATION & DESCRIPTION: Information indicated by an asterisk (') is not required of non -construction CUP's unlessatherwise requested by staff. '1) Provide a full scale (8.1/2 x 11) copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which includes the project site, and indicate the site boundaries. 2r Provide a set of color • photographs that show representative views into the site from the north, south, east, and west, views in and from the site from the primary access points that serve the site; and representative views of significant features from the site. Include a map showing .focationofeach photograph, 3) Project Location (describe): Northside of Foothill Blvd., between Red Hill Country Club Drive and the Union (Southern) Pacific Rail Road Right -of -Way (Pacific Electric Hike/Bike Trail). The site is north, east and west of the Sycamore Inn, The northern project boundary is Red Hill Country Club Dr. and the Red Hill condominiums. 4) Assessor's Parrel Numbers (attach additional sheet if necessary): 0207-101-34-0-000, -31, -13, -41 and 0207-112-09-0-000, -10, -17 '5) Gross Site Area (ac/sq. R.): 24.18 Acres 1) Net Site Area (total site size minus area of public streets &, proposed 23.18 Acres dedications). 7 Describe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change which would affect the project site (attach additional sheet if necessary): None 8 Include a description of all permits which will be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental IPLANNINMFINALIFORMSLCOUNTER,tn tial Study Partl.doc Page 2 of 10 P240 agencies in order to fully implement (he project. The project will require a grading permit and building permits 9 Describe the physical selling of the slle as it exists before the project including information on topography, soil stabllity, plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on site (including age and condition) and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of significant features described, In addition, cite all sources of information (i.e., geological and/or hydrologic studies, biotic and archeological surveys, traffic studies): The portion of the site to the east of the Sycamore Inn slopes upward from Foothill Blvd. to the north. This area is vegetated with mix of grasses, shrubs, and trees. There is a partially demolished abandoned water basin located along Foothill Blvd, near the hike/bike trail. The portion of the site behind the Sycamore Inn slopes northward towards Red Hill Country Club Dr. This area is vegetated with mostly shrubs and trees. There are a couple of accessory structures related to irrigation and drainage that will be removed during development. The portion of the site to the west of the Sycamore Inn is generally flat and is vegetated mostly with grasses. A parking lot and single building are the only remnants of the Red Chief Motel. The remaining building is - currently being used as a restaurant. 10 Describe the known cultural and/or historical aspects of the site. Cite all sources of information (books, published reports and oral history): The project site is north of Route 66 (Foothill Blvd.) and is adjacent to the Sycamore Inn (a City Landmark), which was a stagecoach trading depot during the agricultural development of Rancho Cucamonga. The site includes property that was once the location for the Red Chief Motor Hotel, which served automobile traffic on Route 66. 11PLANNINGIFINALIFORMSICOUNTERIInitial Study Partt.doc Page 3 of 10 P241 11 Describe any noise sources and their levels that now affect the site (aircraft, roadway noise, etc.) and how they will affect proposed uses; Foothill Boulevard is a major thoroughfare directly south of the project. Associated traffic noise will be addressed and mitigated in accordance to city requirements. 12 Describe the proposed project in detail. This should provide an adequate description of the site in terms of ultimata use that will result from the proposed project. Indicate if there aro proposed phases for development, the extent of development to occur with each phase, and the anticipated completion of each increment. Attach additional sheet(s) if necessary: The 152 unit for -sale residential project will replace a previously approved 206 unit project on the site. The revised project contains a mix of attached triplex units and detached condo units that are more compatible with surrounding uses. its simplified grading concept minimizes impacts to up-slope neighbors by using a single building pad closer to Foothill. Significant landscaping along Foothill and at the project entrance (to the west of Sycamore Inn) will create an attractive "gateway" to the City. Most units will contain a minimum of 3 bedroom, and all units will contain 2 enclosed garage parking spaces, with additional guest parking provided throughout. A separate project entrance from Foothill wilt allow Sycamore Inn to function independently and without impact from the project. Residential amenities will include private exterior patios/yards, a community pool, a "tot lot" with play equipment, and an internal trail/walk system that will rink the units to each other and to the recently City hike and bike trail to the east. It is anticipated that the project will be access -controlled. While the construction of individual building may be phased, itis expected that the bulk of the land development work (grading, infrastructure, streets) will be largely completed at one time. 13 Describe the surrounding properties, including information en plants and animals and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (ane -family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.) and scale of development (height, frontage, setback, near yawl, etc.): The Red Hill Condominium Community is located to the north of the site, at the top of a Targe slope. The newly completed Pacific Electric HikefBike Trail i5 directly to the east of the site, with a townhouse project and small City park to the east of the trail. The project fronts Foothill Blvd. to the south, with a variety oI low -intensity commercial uses on the southern side of the roadway. The site surrounds the Sycamore Inn restaurant on 3 sides. Automobile commercial and a single family residence are located to the west of the site. 14 Will the proposed project change the pattem, scale. or character of the surrounding general area of the project? No. The scale and character of the residential project is in consistent with the adjacent Red Hill Country Club Condo project and Pacific Trails townhouse project. The project is also compatible with the nearby commercial uses, as there is appropriate buffering through landscaping and differences in grade. The project is consistent with the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. I.1PLANNINGIFINAL\FORMSICOUNTER\lnitiai Study Partl.doc Page 4 of 10 P242 15 Indicate the type of short-term and long-term noise to be generated, including source and amount. How will these noise levels affect adjacent properties and an -site uses? What methods of soundproofing am proposed? There is no long-term noise generation, only short term noise generated during project construction. The project will comply with applicable noise standards as they relate to construction generated noise. '16, tndicateproposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenic trees: Development of the site requires removal and replacement of mature and/or scenic trees on site. Any necessary removals will be subject to City tree removal permit requirements. All mature trees on site have been surveyed by an arborlst and assessed for damage/health and suitability, 17, indicate any bodies of water (including domestic water supplies) into which the site drains: None. 18 Indicate expected amount of water usage. (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification. please contact the Cucamonga Valley Water District at 987-2591. 73,485 146,970 a. Residential (gal/day) Peak use (gal/Day) b. Commercial/1nd. (gal/day/ac) 0.00 Peak use (gal/min/ac) 0.00 19 Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal. 0 Septic Tank ❑r Sewer. if septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests. N discharge 10 a sanitary sewage system is proposed indicate expected daily sewage generation: (See Attachment for usage estimates). For further clarification. please contact the Cucamonga Valley Water District at 987-2591. a. Residential (gaUday) b. Commercial/Industrial (gal/day/ac) 35040 0 RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20, Number of residential units:152 Detached (indicate range of parcel sizes, minimum lot size and maximum lot size: 77 single-family detached units (detached condominium - no fee Tots) Attached (indicate whether units are rental or for sale units): 75 for -sale single-family triplex units 11FLANNING\FINALIFORMSICOUNTER11n ta! Study Parttdoc Page 6 of 10 21 Anticipated range of sate prices and/or rents: 235,000 385,008 Sale Price(s) $ to $ Rent (per month) $ to $ 22, Specify number of bedrooms by unit type: Detached (77 units) Plan 1 - 3BR (1744 SF) Plan 2A - 3BR/Oplional 4th (1813 SF) Plan 2B - 3 BR/Optional 4th (1800 SF) Plan 3 - 4BR (1896 SF) Attached (75 units) Plan 1 - 2BR (1287 SF) Plan 2 - 2 BR/optional 3rd (1540 SF) Plan 3 - 2BR/Optional 3rd (1670 SF) 23, indicate anticipated household size by unit type: 2 BR units - 2.5 persons 3 BR units • 3.5 persons 4 BR units - 4.2 persons 24 indicate the expected number of school children who will be residing within the project: Contact the appropriate School Districts as shown in Attachment 8: a. Elementary: b. Junior High: c. Senior High COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRiALLAND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25, Describe type of use(s) and major function(s) of commercial, industrial or institutional uses: N/A 25, Total floor area of commercial, industrial, or institutional uses by type: N/A 27, Indicate hours of operation; N/A 28) Number of employees: Total Maximum Shift: Time of Maximum Shift: I IPLANNiNG1F1NALIFORMSICOUNTERIInilial Study Pat .doc Page 6 of 10 P243 P244 29 Provide breakdown of anticipated job classifications, including wage and salary ranges, as well as an indication of the rata a hire for each classification (attach additional sheet if necessary): N!A 30. Estimation of the number of workers to be hired that currently reside in the City: t3 '31 For commercial and industrial uses only, indicate the source, type, and amount of air pollution emissions. (Data should be verified through the South Coast Air Quality Management District, at (818) 572-6283): N/A ALL PROJECTS 32 Have the water, sewer, fire, and flood control agencies serving the project been contacted to determine their ability to provide adequate service to the proposed project? If so, please indicate their response, All agencies have indicated their ability to provide adequate service for the project. 33 to the known history of this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials' Examples of hazardous endior toxic materials include, but are not limited to PCB's; radioactive substances; pesticides ane herbicides; fuels, oils, solvents, and other flammable liquids and gases. Also note underground storage of any of the above Please list the materials and describe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, , known. None. I. tPLANNINGIFINAL1FORMS1COIJN7ER1Irilial Study Partl.doc Page 7 or 10 P245 34 Will the proposed project involve the temporary or long-term use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials including but not limited to those examples listed above? if yes, provide an inventory of all such materials to be used anc proposed method of disposal. The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown anc labeled on the application plans. No. 35 The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fee. The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission/Planning Director hearing: t hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for adequate evaluation of this project to the best of my ability, that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct tot he best of my knowledge and belief 1 further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Date: 67111 Signature: f ( ^ Title: t-ra'1 Q tr j- tow k5 eve. PIPLANNINGIFINALIFORMSICOL]NTERIIn tial Study Partl.doc Page 8 of 10 P246 BACKGROUND City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II 1. Project File: General Plan Amendment DRC2016-00206, Tentative Tract Map Modification SUBTT16605M, Design Review DRC2012-00672, Variance DRC2016-00207, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2012-00673. 2. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2004-00339, Development Code Amendment DRC2004-00352, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16605, Development Review DRC203-00637, Variance DRC2005-01061, Minor Development Review DRC2004-00826, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00082, 3. Description of Project: The applicant, Pacific Summit -Foothill, LLC, proposes an amendment to the General Plan to revise tables and text, including clarifying text as necessary to allow the development of land that contains slopes of 30 percent or greater, a Tentative Tract Map to subdivide a property of 24.19 acres into 6 parcels, and a Design Review for the development of 175 condominium units (including 9 live -work units) located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between Red Hill Country Club Drive and the Pacific Electric Trail. 4. Project Sponsor Name and Address: Chad Stadnicki Pacific Summit -Foothill, LLC 212 S. Palm Avenue, 2nd Floor Alhambra, CA 91801 5. General Plan Designation: Mixed Use 6. Zoning: Mixed Use (MU) District 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The project site is located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between San Bernardino Road and Baker Avenue in a hillside area on the southerly flank of Red Hill and surrounding the historic Sycamore lnn restaurant. The project site land use designation is the Mixed Use (MU) District. The property to the north contains the Red Hill Condominiums in the Medium (M) Residential District, vacant lots in the Low (L) Residential District, and the Red Hill Country Club and golf course in the Low (L) Residential District. The property to the west contains residential and commercial uses in the Mixed Use (MU) District. The property to the east is the Pacific Electric Trail, the Route 66 Trailhead, and residential uses across Foothill Boulevard in the Medium (M) Residential District. The property to the south, across Foothill Boulevard, includes residential and commercial land uses in the Medium (M) Residential District and the Mixed Use (MU) District. The project site is predominately vacant, but includes one restaurant use to the west of the Sycamore Inn. The current proposal provides one access point for a right -in -right -out driveway west of the Sycamore Inn. The current proposal differs from the previously approved project site plan in that the project now surrounds the Sycamore Inn rather than taking access directly through the signalized access to the Sycamore lnn site. 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 P247 Initial Study for DRC2016-00206, SUBTT16605M, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 Page 2 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Tom Grahn, Associate Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department (909) 774-4312 10. Other agencies whose approval is required: None. GLOSSARY — The following abbreviations are used in this report: CALEEMOD — California Emissions Estimator Model CVWD — Cucamonga Valley Water District EIR — Environmental Impact Report FEIR— Final Environmental Impact Report FPEIR — Final Program Environmental Impact Report NPDES — National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NOx -- Nitrogen Oxides ROG — Reactive Organic Gases PMio — Fine Particulate Matter RWQCB -- Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD -- South Coast Air Quality Management District SWPPP — Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than -Significant -Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. (✓) Aesthetics (✓) Biological Resources (✓) Greenhouse Gas Emissions ( ) Land Use & Planning ( ) Population & Housing ( ) Transportation/Traffic (✓) Mandatory Findings of Significance (✓) Agricultural Resources (✓) Cultural Resources ( ) Hazards & Waste Materials ( ) Mineral Resources ( ) Public Services (✓) Tribal Cultural Resources (✓) Air Quality (✓) Geology & Soils (✓) Hydrology & Water Quality (✓) Noise ( ) Recreation ( ) Utilities & Service Systems DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by, or agreed to, by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. find that the proposed project MAY have a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standard and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. Rev 9-29-15 Initial Study for DRC2016-00206, SUBTT16605M, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 Page 3 An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to ap•licable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR .r NEGA E DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are impose. Jon he pro, used project, nothing further is required. Prepared By: Reviewed By: Rev 9-29-15 Date: Date: lk P248 P249 Initial Study for DRC2016-00206, SUBTT16606M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 4 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? () Less Than () (✓) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway? () Significant Less (✓) Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Impact Incorporated Impact Impact EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? () () () (✓) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway? () () () (✓) c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? () () 1 () (✓) d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? () () (✓) ( ) Comments: a) As identified in the General Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR), the City sits at the southern base of the San Gabriel Mountains, at the eastern end of its range. The San Bernardino Mountains are just east of the San Gabriel Mountains, divided by the Cajon Pass. Views of the San Gabriel and San Bernardino Mountains are visible from the project site. According to Figure LU -6 of the General Plan, there are no view corridors in the vicinity of the project site; however, the entire length of Foothill Boulevard is designated as a Major Divided Arterial (Figure CM -2) and Special Boulevard (Figure LU -6) as it traverses across the City. The proposed project is directly adjacent to portions of Foothill Boulevard. The General Plan identifies that a Special Boulevard is characterized by landscaping, hardscaping, and meandering sidewalks. Project improvements would include the installation of landscaping and a meandering sidewalk along Foothill Boulevard, these improvements support the Special Boulevard designation. The City recognizes other scenic resources, including remaining stands of eucalyptus windrows, scattered vineyards and orange groves, and natural vegetation. Significant visual features that frame the project site include the historic Sycamore Inn, the Red Hill Bluff to the north, and the Pacific Electric Trail to the south and east. Mature heritage trees existing on-site are discussed in the Section 4e under Biological Resources below. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. b) The project site contains no scenic resources and no historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway. Immediately adjacent to the project site, actually surrounded by the project site, is the Sycamore Inn, a local designated Point of Interest, and the Statue of Oso Bear, a Designated Local Landmark, both items are located at 8318 Foothill Boulevard. The project design encompasses properties surrounding the Sycamore Inn and the Statue of Oso Bear, will complete al! necessary right-of-way improvements along the projects Foothill Boulevard street frontage (not including the Sycamore Inn street frontage), and will install perimeter walls and landscaping as a buffer between the project site and existing land uses. There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. c) The proposed project site is located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between San Bernardino Road and Baker Avenue in a hillside area on the southerly flank of Red Hill and surrounding the historic Sycamore Inn restaurant. The project proposes to amend the General Plan to permit development on slopes 30 percent and greater, the subdivision of a 24.19 acre site into 6 parcels, and the development of 175 condominium units (including Rev 9-29-15 P25O Initial Study for DRC2016-00206, SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 5 9 live -work units) in the Mixed Use (MU) District. The project site characterized by the existing condominiums, vacant land and golf course land uses to the north, residential and commercial land uses to the west, the Pacific Electric Trail and Route 66 Trailhead to the east, and residential and commercial land uses to the south. The visual quality of the area will not degrade as a result of this project. All necessary right-of-way improvements will be installed along both Foothill Boulevard and Red Hip Country Club Drive. Since the project fronts onto Foothill Boulevard improvements required by the Foothill Boulevard -Visual Improvement Plan will be conditioned upon approval. City standards require the developer to underground existing and new utility lines and facilities to minimize the unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No. 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The project site is located in an area that is subject to nighttime lighting from surrounding commercial and residential uses and street lighting along Foothill Boulevard. Additionally, development of the project site would increase the number of streetlights and security lighting used in the immediate vicinity. The design and placement of light fixtures require compliance with City standards that require shielding, diffusing, or indirect lighting to avoid glare. On-site illumination levels (provided for street lighting, parking, circulation, and pedestrian areas) will comply with Development Code standards and will be shielded from adjacent properties. Lighting will be selected and located to confine the area of illumination to within the project site. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? () Less Than (✓) ( ) b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? () Significant Less (✓) Issues and Supporting information Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant Nv d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non -forest use? Impact Incorporated 1 Impact Impact 9 live -work units) in the Mixed Use (MU) District. The project site characterized by the existing condominiums, vacant land and golf course land uses to the north, residential and commercial land uses to the west, the Pacific Electric Trail and Route 66 Trailhead to the east, and residential and commercial land uses to the south. The visual quality of the area will not degrade as a result of this project. All necessary right-of-way improvements will be installed along both Foothill Boulevard and Red Hip Country Club Drive. Since the project fronts onto Foothill Boulevard improvements required by the Foothill Boulevard -Visual Improvement Plan will be conditioned upon approval. City standards require the developer to underground existing and new utility lines and facilities to minimize the unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No. 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The project site is located in an area that is subject to nighttime lighting from surrounding commercial and residential uses and street lighting along Foothill Boulevard. Additionally, development of the project site would increase the number of streetlights and security lighting used in the immediate vicinity. The design and placement of light fixtures require compliance with City standards that require shielding, diffusing, or indirect lighting to avoid glare. On-site illumination levels (provided for street lighting, parking, circulation, and pedestrian areas) will comply with Development Code standards and will be shielded from adjacent properties. Lighting will be selected and located to confine the area of illumination to within the project site. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? () () (✓) ( ) b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? () () () (✓) c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause re -zoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220 (g), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code Section 51104 (g))? () () () (✓) d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non -forest use? () () () (✓) e) Involve other changes in the existing environment, which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest [and to non -forest use? () () () (✓) Comments: a) The site is not designated as Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance. The proposed project site is located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between San Bernardino Road and Baker Avenue in a hillside area on the southerly flank of Red Hill and surrounding the historic Sycamore Inn restaurant. The Rev 9-29-15 P251 Initial Study for DRC2016-00206, SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 6 project proposes to amend the General Pan to permit development on slopes 30 percent and greater, the subdivision of a 24.19 acre site into 6 parcels, and the development of 175 condominium units (including 9 live -work units) in the Mixed Use (MU) District. The project site characterized by the existing condominiums, vacant land and golf course land uses to the north, residential and commercial land uses to the west, the Pacific Electric Trail and Route 66 Trailhead to the east, and residential and commercial land uses to the south. There are approximately 209 acres of Farmland of Local Importance, Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga according to the General Plan and the California Department of Conservation Farmland Map 2010. Concentrations of Important Farmland are sparsely located in the southern and eastern parts of the City that is characterized by existing and planned development. Farmland in the southern portion of the City is characterized by industrial, residential, and commercial land uses and Farmland in the eastern portion of the City is within the Etiwanda area and planned for development. Further, a large number of the designated farmland parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic viability is doubtful; therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan. The General Plan FPEIR identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPE!R was prepared and impacts evaluated. b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. There are no Williamson Act contracts within the City. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. c) There are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga zoned as forest land or timberland. Therefore no impacts would occur related to the conversion of forest land to non -forest use. Further, there are no areas within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that are zoned as forest land, timberland, or Timberland Production. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. d) There are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that qualify as forest land or timberland. Therefore no impacts would occur related to the loss or conversion of forest land to non -forest use. Further, there are no areas within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that are zoned as forest land, timberland, or Timberland Production. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. e) The proposed project site is located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between San Bernardino Road and Baker Avenue in a hillside area on the southerly flank of Red Hill and surrounding the historic Sycamore Inn restaurant. The project proposes to amend the General Plan to permit development on slopes 30 percent and greater, the subdivision of a 24.19 acre site into 6 parcels, and the development of 175 condominium units (including 9 live -work units) in the Mixed Use (MU) District. The project site characterized by the existing condominiums, vacant land and golf course land uses to the north, residential and commercial land uses to the west, the Pacific Electric Trail and Route 66 Trailhead to the east, and residential and commercial land uses to the south. Furthermore, there are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that qualify as forest land and therefore, there is no potential for conversion of forest land to a non -forest use. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 9-29-15 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact project proposes to amend the General Pan to permit development on slopes 30 percent and greater, the subdivision of a 24.19 acre site into 6 parcels, and the development of 175 condominium units (including 9 live -work units) in the Mixed Use (MU) District. The project site characterized by the existing condominiums, vacant land and golf course land uses to the north, residential and commercial land uses to the west, the Pacific Electric Trail and Route 66 Trailhead to the east, and residential and commercial land uses to the south. There are approximately 209 acres of Farmland of Local Importance, Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga according to the General Plan and the California Department of Conservation Farmland Map 2010. Concentrations of Important Farmland are sparsely located in the southern and eastern parts of the City that is characterized by existing and planned development. Farmland in the southern portion of the City is characterized by industrial, residential, and commercial land uses and Farmland in the eastern portion of the City is within the Etiwanda area and planned for development. Further, a large number of the designated farmland parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic viability is doubtful; therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan. The General Plan FPEIR identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPE!R was prepared and impacts evaluated. b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. There are no Williamson Act contracts within the City. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. c) There are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga zoned as forest land or timberland. Therefore no impacts would occur related to the conversion of forest land to non -forest use. Further, there are no areas within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that are zoned as forest land, timberland, or Timberland Production. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. d) There are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that qualify as forest land or timberland. Therefore no impacts would occur related to the loss or conversion of forest land to non -forest use. Further, there are no areas within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that are zoned as forest land, timberland, or Timberland Production. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. e) The proposed project site is located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between San Bernardino Road and Baker Avenue in a hillside area on the southerly flank of Red Hill and surrounding the historic Sycamore Inn restaurant. The project proposes to amend the General Plan to permit development on slopes 30 percent and greater, the subdivision of a 24.19 acre site into 6 parcels, and the development of 175 condominium units (including 9 live -work units) in the Mixed Use (MU) District. The project site characterized by the existing condominiums, vacant land and golf course land uses to the north, residential and commercial land uses to the west, the Pacific Electric Trail and Route 66 Trailhead to the east, and residential and commercial land uses to the south. Furthermore, there are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that qualify as forest land and therefore, there is no potential for conversion of forest land to a non -forest use. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 9-29-15 Initial Study for DRC2016-00206, SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 7 3. AIR QUALITY. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? () Less Than ( ) (✓) b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? () Significant Less ( ) Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 3. AIR QUALITY. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? () () ( ) (✓) b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? () (✓) () ( ) c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non - attainment under an, applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors? () (✓) () ( ) d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? () (✓) () ( ) e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? () () () (✓) Comments: a) As discussed in subsection b, the project would not exceed any air quality standards and would not interfere with the region's ability to comply with Federal and State air quality standards for Criterion 1 Increase in the Frequency or Severity of Violations (local air quality impacts) or Criterion 2 Exceed Assumptions in the AQMP (consistency with the 2003 AQMP). Therefore the project is consistent with the 2003 AQMP. b) Both the State of California and the Federal government have established health -based ambient air quality standards (AAQS) for seven air pollutants. These pollutants include ozone (03), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), coarse particulate matter with a diameter or 10 microns or less (PM%o), fine particulate matter less than 2.5 (PM2.5) microns in diameter and lead. Among #hese pollutants, ozone and particulate matter (PM,o and PM2.5) are considered regional pollutants while the others have more localized effects. In addition, the State of California has set standards for sulfates, hydrogen sulfide (H2S), vinyl chloride and visibility reducing particles. These standards are designed to protect the health and welfare of the populace with a reasonable margin of safety. The City of Rancho Cucamonga area is within the South Coast Air Basin, which is under the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). The California Clean Air Act (CCAA) provides the SCAQMD with the authority to manage transportation activities at indirect sources. indirect sources of pollution are generated when minor sources collectively emit a substantial amount of pollution. Examples of this include motor vehicles at an intersection, a mall and on highways. SCAQMD also regulates stationary sources of pollution within a jurisdictional area. Direct emissions from motor vehicles are regulated by the Air Resources Board (ARB). The combination of topography, low mixing height, abundant sunshine, and emissions from the second largest urban area in the United States gives the Basin the worst air pollution problem in the nation. The Basin experiences a persistent temperature inversion (increasing temperature with increasing altitude); this inversion (coupled with low wind Rev 9-29-15 P252 Initial Study for DRC2016-00206, SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 8 speeds) limits the vertical dispersion of air contaminants, holding them relatively near the ground. Pursuant to the Federal Clean Air Act (FCAA) of 1970, the EPA established national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for six major pollutants, termed criteria pollutants: ozone (03), coarse particulate matter with a diameter or 10 microns or less (PM1o), fine particulate matter less than 2.5 (PM25) microns in diameter, carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (802), and lead. Criteria pollutants are defined as those pollutants for which the Federal and State governments have established AAQS, or criteria, for outdoor concentrations in order to protect public health. Data collected at permanent monitoring stations are used by the EPA to classify regions as "attainment" or "non -attainment" depending on whether the regions met the requirements stated in the primary. NAAQS. Nonattainment areas have additional restrictions as required by the EPA. The EPA has designated the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) as the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) responsible for ensuring the Basin's compliance with the FCAA. The South Coast Air Basin is in nonattainment Status for Ozone (8 -hour) and PMio under National Ambient Air Quality Standards, and in nonattainment status for Ozone (1 -hour and 8 -hour) PMio and PM2.5 under California Ambient Air Quality Standards. Specific criteria for determining whether the potential air quality impacts of a project are significant are set forth in the SCAQMD's CEQA Air Quality Handbook. The criteria include daily emissions thresholds, compliance with State and national air quality standards, and consistency with the current AQMP. As prescribed by SCAQMD, an Air Quality Assessment (Landrum & Brown, July 2015) was prepared that utilizes CaIEEMod (Version 2013.2.2) to evaluate short-term construction emissions and short-term construction emissions for localized significant thresholds, long-term operational emissions, operation emissions for localized significant thresholds, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Short Term (Construction): Project Emissions and Impacts The project proposes the subdivision of a'24.19 acre site into 6 parcels and the development of 175 condominium units (including 9 live -work units) in the Mixed Use (MU) District. The potential emissions associated with construction of the project are described in the following sections. Rev 9-29-15 P253 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No: Impact Incorporated Impact Impact speeds) limits the vertical dispersion of air contaminants, holding them relatively near the ground. Pursuant to the Federal Clean Air Act (FCAA) of 1970, the EPA established national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for six major pollutants, termed criteria pollutants: ozone (03), coarse particulate matter with a diameter or 10 microns or less (PM1o), fine particulate matter less than 2.5 (PM25) microns in diameter, carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (802), and lead. Criteria pollutants are defined as those pollutants for which the Federal and State governments have established AAQS, or criteria, for outdoor concentrations in order to protect public health. Data collected at permanent monitoring stations are used by the EPA to classify regions as "attainment" or "non -attainment" depending on whether the regions met the requirements stated in the primary. NAAQS. Nonattainment areas have additional restrictions as required by the EPA. The EPA has designated the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) as the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) responsible for ensuring the Basin's compliance with the FCAA. The South Coast Air Basin is in nonattainment Status for Ozone (8 -hour) and PMio under National Ambient Air Quality Standards, and in nonattainment status for Ozone (1 -hour and 8 -hour) PMio and PM2.5 under California Ambient Air Quality Standards. Specific criteria for determining whether the potential air quality impacts of a project are significant are set forth in the SCAQMD's CEQA Air Quality Handbook. The criteria include daily emissions thresholds, compliance with State and national air quality standards, and consistency with the current AQMP. As prescribed by SCAQMD, an Air Quality Assessment (Landrum & Brown, July 2015) was prepared that utilizes CaIEEMod (Version 2013.2.2) to evaluate short-term construction emissions and short-term construction emissions for localized significant thresholds, long-term operational emissions, operation emissions for localized significant thresholds, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Short Term (Construction): Project Emissions and Impacts The project proposes the subdivision of a'24.19 acre site into 6 parcels and the development of 175 condominium units (including 9 live -work units) in the Mixed Use (MU) District. The potential emissions associated with construction of the project are described in the following sections. Rev 9-29-15 P253 Initial Study for DRC2016-00206, SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 9 Summary of Peak Construction Emissions (Estimated Maximum Daily Construction Emissions and Regional Thresholds) Total Construction Emissions by Activity Activity Daily Emissions (lips/day) CO N'O,. 'VQC PMia PM2.5 SOX Demolition 35.1 45.8 4.3 2.4 2.2 0.04 Site Preparation 42.3 54.7 5.2 11.3 7.2 0.04 Grading 55.4 81.8 7.0 6.3 5.2 0.06 Construction (2016) 28.8 30.7 4.1 3.5 2.3 0.05 Construction (2017) 27.5 28.4 3.7 13 2.1 0.05 Construction (2018) 26.1 25.1 3.2 3.0 1.8 0.05 Paving 15.3 17.2 1.7 1.1 0.9 0.02 Painting 3.3 2.1 67.6 0.4 0.2 0.01 Significance 550 100 75 150 55 150 Threshold Exceed Threshold? No No No No No No Construction activities associated with the project will result in emissions of CO, VOCs, NOx, SOx, PMso and PM2.5 and are expected from the following construction activities: demolition, grading (including soil import/export), building construction, painting (architectural coatings), paving (curb, gutter, and flatwork), and construction worker commuting. Localized Significance Summary in Pounds Per Day (Estimated Maximum Daily Construction Emissions and LSTs) Total Concurrent Construction Emissions Activity Daily Emissions (lbs/day) CO NO V0C PM,o PM2-5 50,, Construction, Painting and Paving 46.1 47.8 73.0 4.9 3.2 0.1 Significance Threshold 550 100 75 150 55 150 Exceed Threshold? No No No No No No Equipment Exhausts and Related Construction Activities Construction activities produce combustion emissions from various sources such as site grading, utility engines, on-site heavy-duty construction vehicles, asphalt paving, and motor vehicles transporting the construction crew. Exhaust emissions from construction activities envisioned on site would vary daily as construction activity levels change. The use of construction equipment on site would result in localized exhaust emissions; however, as shown in the tables above, the amount will not exceed any Local Significance Threshold. Rev 9-29-15 P254 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than significant No Impact Incorporated Impact impact Summary of Peak Construction Emissions (Estimated Maximum Daily Construction Emissions and Regional Thresholds) Total Construction Emissions by Activity Activity Daily Emissions (lips/day) CO N'O,. 'VQC PMia PM2.5 SOX Demolition 35.1 45.8 4.3 2.4 2.2 0.04 Site Preparation 42.3 54.7 5.2 11.3 7.2 0.04 Grading 55.4 81.8 7.0 6.3 5.2 0.06 Construction (2016) 28.8 30.7 4.1 3.5 2.3 0.05 Construction (2017) 27.5 28.4 3.7 13 2.1 0.05 Construction (2018) 26.1 25.1 3.2 3.0 1.8 0.05 Paving 15.3 17.2 1.7 1.1 0.9 0.02 Painting 3.3 2.1 67.6 0.4 0.2 0.01 Significance 550 100 75 150 55 150 Threshold Exceed Threshold? No No No No No No Construction activities associated with the project will result in emissions of CO, VOCs, NOx, SOx, PMso and PM2.5 and are expected from the following construction activities: demolition, grading (including soil import/export), building construction, painting (architectural coatings), paving (curb, gutter, and flatwork), and construction worker commuting. Localized Significance Summary in Pounds Per Day (Estimated Maximum Daily Construction Emissions and LSTs) Total Concurrent Construction Emissions Activity Daily Emissions (lbs/day) CO NO V0C PM,o PM2-5 50,, Construction, Painting and Paving 46.1 47.8 73.0 4.9 3.2 0.1 Significance Threshold 550 100 75 150 55 150 Exceed Threshold? No No No No No No Equipment Exhausts and Related Construction Activities Construction activities produce combustion emissions from various sources such as site grading, utility engines, on-site heavy-duty construction vehicles, asphalt paving, and motor vehicles transporting the construction crew. Exhaust emissions from construction activities envisioned on site would vary daily as construction activity levels change. The use of construction equipment on site would result in localized exhaust emissions; however, as shown in the tables above, the amount will not exceed any Local Significance Threshold. Rev 9-29-15 P254 Initial Study for DRC2016-00206, SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 10 Fugitive Dust Fugitive dust emissions are generally emissions associated with land clearing and exposure of soils to the air and wind, and cut -and -fill grading operations. Dust generated during construction varies substantially on a project -by project basis, depending on the level of activity, the specific operation and weather conditions at the time of construction. Construction emissions can vary greatly depending on the level of activity, the specific operations taking place, the equipment being operated, local soils, weather conditions and other factors. The proposed project will be required to comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 to control fugitive dust. Architectural Coatings Architectural coatings contain VOCs that are similar to ROCs and are part of the 03 precursors. Based on the proposed project, it is estimated that the proposed project will result in a maximum of approximately 73 lbs of VOC per day (combined for all construction sources) during construction. Therefore, this VOC emission is the principal air emission and is less than the SCAQMD VOC threshold of 75 lbs/day. Odors Heavy-duty equipment in the project area during construction would emit odors. However, the construction activity would cease to occur after individual construction is completed. No other sources of objectionable odors have been identified for the proposed project, and no mitigation measures are required. In compliance with SCAQMD Rule 402 the proposed uses are not anticipated to emit any objectionable odors. Therefore, objectionable odors posing a health risk to potential on-site and existing off-site uses would not occur as a result of the proposed project. Naturally Occurring Asbestos The proposed project is located in San Bernardino County and it is not among the counties that are found to have serpentine and ultramafic rock in their soils. In addition, there has been no serpentine or ultramafic rock found in the project area. Therefore, the potential risk for naturally occurring asbestos (NOA) during project construction is small and less than significant. Based on the discussion above and with implementation of the following mitigation measures, short-term, construction impacts will be less -than -significant: 1) During grading activity, all construction equipment (>_ 150 horsepower) shall be California Air Resources Board (CARB) Tier 3 Certified or better. 2) All clearing, grading, earth -moving, or excavation activities shall cease when winds exceed 25 mph per SCAQMD guidelines in order to limit fugitive dust emissions. 3) The contractor shall ensure that all disturbed unpaved roads and disturbed areas within the Project are watered at least three (3) times daily during dry weather. Watering, with complete coverage of disturbed areas, shall occur Rev 9-29-15 P255 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Fugitive Dust Fugitive dust emissions are generally emissions associated with land clearing and exposure of soils to the air and wind, and cut -and -fill grading operations. Dust generated during construction varies substantially on a project -by project basis, depending on the level of activity, the specific operation and weather conditions at the time of construction. Construction emissions can vary greatly depending on the level of activity, the specific operations taking place, the equipment being operated, local soils, weather conditions and other factors. The proposed project will be required to comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 to control fugitive dust. Architectural Coatings Architectural coatings contain VOCs that are similar to ROCs and are part of the 03 precursors. Based on the proposed project, it is estimated that the proposed project will result in a maximum of approximately 73 lbs of VOC per day (combined for all construction sources) during construction. Therefore, this VOC emission is the principal air emission and is less than the SCAQMD VOC threshold of 75 lbs/day. Odors Heavy-duty equipment in the project area during construction would emit odors. However, the construction activity would cease to occur after individual construction is completed. No other sources of objectionable odors have been identified for the proposed project, and no mitigation measures are required. In compliance with SCAQMD Rule 402 the proposed uses are not anticipated to emit any objectionable odors. Therefore, objectionable odors posing a health risk to potential on-site and existing off-site uses would not occur as a result of the proposed project. Naturally Occurring Asbestos The proposed project is located in San Bernardino County and it is not among the counties that are found to have serpentine and ultramafic rock in their soils. In addition, there has been no serpentine or ultramafic rock found in the project area. Therefore, the potential risk for naturally occurring asbestos (NOA) during project construction is small and less than significant. Based on the discussion above and with implementation of the following mitigation measures, short-term, construction impacts will be less -than -significant: 1) During grading activity, all construction equipment (>_ 150 horsepower) shall be California Air Resources Board (CARB) Tier 3 Certified or better. 2) All clearing, grading, earth -moving, or excavation activities shall cease when winds exceed 25 mph per SCAQMD guidelines in order to limit fugitive dust emissions. 3) The contractor shall ensure that all disturbed unpaved roads and disturbed areas within the Project are watered at least three (3) times daily during dry weather. Watering, with complete coverage of disturbed areas, shall occur Rev 9-29-15 P255 Initial Study for DRC2016-00206, SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 11 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Rev 9-29-15 Potentially Significant )mpact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Slgnificanl Impact No Impact at least three times a day, preferably in the midmorning, afternoon, and after work is done for the day. 4) The contractor shall ensure that traffic speeds on unpaved roads and Project site areas are reduced to 15 miles per hour or less. Cumulative Impacts: Short -Term Construction Emissions Continued development will contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions. In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction activities. While most of the dust would settle on or near the project site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area. Construction is an on-going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area. Construction workers and equipment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete. Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment emissions are required to be assessed. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of Air Quality based on the future build out of the City. Based upon on the Urban Emissions Model (URBEMIS7G) estimates in Table 4.3-3 of the General Plan (FPEIR), Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2), Ozone (03), and Particulate Matter (PM2.5 and PM,a) would exceed SCAQMD thresholds for significance; therefore, they would all be cumulatively considerable if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less -than -significant. This city-wide increase in emissions was identified as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council as noted in the Section 4.3 of the General Plan FPEIR. This project would amend the General Plan to permit the development of slopes that are greater than 30 percent to support the subdivision of a 24.19 acre site into 6 parcels and the development of 175 condominium units (including 9 live -work units) in the Mixed Use (MU) District. Based on the Air Quality Assessment (Landrum & Brown, July 2015) no short=term, operational impacts would occur as a result of the project. Because the project would result in minimal emissions that do not exceed any thresholds of significance, the project's contribution to cumulative impacts is also considered minimal. With implementation of the following best practices and mitigation measures from the City's 2010 General Plan FPEIR that are designed to minimize short-term air quality impacts, the project's contribution to cumulative impacts will be less -than -significant: 5) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 6) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall P256 Initial Study for DRC2016-00206, SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 12 also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. 7) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 8) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction -grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 9) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 10) Ali paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 11) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24 -inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 12) The site shall be treated with water or other soil -stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB)) daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. Rev 9-29-15 P257 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No !mpact ,Incorporated Impact Impact also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. 7) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 8) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction -grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 9) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 10) Ali paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 11) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24 -inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 12) The site shall be treated with water or other soil -stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB)) daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. Rev 9-29-15 P257 Initial Study for DRC2016-00206, SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 13 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potenliafly Significant Impact Less Than significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 13) Chemical soil -stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. Project Long Term (Operational) Emissions and Impacts Long-term air pollutant emissions are those associated with stationary sources and mobile sources involving any project -related changes. The proposed project would result in a net increase in the amount of development in the area; therefore, the proposed project would result in net increases in both stationary and mobile source emissions. The stationary source emissions would come from additional natural gas consumption for on-site buildings and electricity for the lighting in the buildings and at the parking area. As shown in the following tables, project implementation will not exceed any significance thresholds. No long-term, operational impacts will occur as a result of the project. Summary of Peak Operational Emissions Total Emissions With Project Daily Emissions (lbs/day) Activity CO VOC NOx PMlo PM2.5 SOx Vehicular Emissions _ 45.9_ 3.9 12.6 8.0 2.3 0.12 - Natural Gas combustion 0.4 0.1 0.9 0.1 0.1 0.01 Landscaping 14,3 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.00 Consumer Products 0.0 �.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 Architectural Coatings 0.0 -- 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 Total Emissions 60.6 8.2 13,7 8.2 2.4 0.1 Significance Threshold 550 55 55 150 55 150 Exceed Threshold? No Into No No No No Cumulative Impacts (Long Term/Operational Emissions) The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the potential impacts to air quality based on the future build out of the City. In the long-term, continued development would result in significant operational vehicle emissions based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 4.3-3 of the General Plan FPEIR; therefore, all developments would be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a less -than -significant level. This City-wide increase in emissions was identified as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council as noted in the Section 4.3 of the General Plan FPEIR. This project would amend the General Plan to permit the development of slopes that are greater than 30 percent to support the subdivision of a 24.19 acre site into 6 parcels and the development of 175 condominium units (including 9 live -work units) in the Mixed Use (MU) District. Based on the Air Quality Assessment (Landrum & Brown, July 2015) no short-term, operational impacts would occur as a result of the project. Because the project would result in minimal emissions that do not exceed any thresholds of significance, the project's contribution to cumulative impacts is also considered minimal. Rev 9-29-15 P258 P259 Initial Study for DRC2016-00206, SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 14 With implementation of the following mitigation measures from the City's 2010 General Plan FPEIR that are designed to minimize long-term, operational air quality impacts, the project's contribution to cumulative impacts will be less -than -significant: 14) Provide adequate ingress and egress at all entrances to public facilities to minimize vehicle idling at curbsides. 15) Provide preferential parking to high occupancy vehicles and shuttle services. 16) Schedule truck deliveries and pickups during off-peak hours. 17) Improve thermal integrity of the buildings and reduce thermal load with automated time clocks or occupant sensors. 18) Landscape with native and/or drought -resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 19) Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planting programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC -01 measure. 20) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiencyllow-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 21) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. c) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 4.3), continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. The General Plan FPEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. As noted in subsection b above, the project would amend the General Plan to permit the development of slopes that are greater than 30 percent to support the subdivision of a 24.19 acre site into 6 parcels and the development of 175 condominium units (including 9 live -work units) in the Mixed Use (MU) District. Based on the Air Quality Assessment (Landrum & Brown, July 2015) no short-term, operational impacts would occur as a result of the project. Because the project would result in minimal emissions that do not exceed any thresholds of significance, the project's contribution to cumulative impacts is also considered minimal. With implementation of mitigation measures listed in subsection b) above from the City's 2010 General Plan FPEIR, which are designed to minimize long-term, operational air quality impacts, cumulative impacts will be less -than -significant. d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large. The SCAQMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors: long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic Rev 9-29-15 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact impact With implementation of the following mitigation measures from the City's 2010 General Plan FPEIR that are designed to minimize long-term, operational air quality impacts, the project's contribution to cumulative impacts will be less -than -significant: 14) Provide adequate ingress and egress at all entrances to public facilities to minimize vehicle idling at curbsides. 15) Provide preferential parking to high occupancy vehicles and shuttle services. 16) Schedule truck deliveries and pickups during off-peak hours. 17) Improve thermal integrity of the buildings and reduce thermal load with automated time clocks or occupant sensors. 18) Landscape with native and/or drought -resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 19) Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planting programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC -01 measure. 20) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiencyllow-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 21) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. c) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 4.3), continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. The General Plan FPEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. As noted in subsection b above, the project would amend the General Plan to permit the development of slopes that are greater than 30 percent to support the subdivision of a 24.19 acre site into 6 parcels and the development of 175 condominium units (including 9 live -work units) in the Mixed Use (MU) District. Based on the Air Quality Assessment (Landrum & Brown, July 2015) no short-term, operational impacts would occur as a result of the project. Because the project would result in minimal emissions that do not exceed any thresholds of significance, the project's contribution to cumulative impacts is also considered minimal. With implementation of mitigation measures listed in subsection b) above from the City's 2010 General Plan FPEIR, which are designed to minimize long-term, operational air quality impacts, cumulative impacts will be less -than -significant. d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large. The SCAQMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors: long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic Rev 9-29-15 P260 Initial Study for DRC2016-00206, SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 15 facilities. According to the SCAQMD, projects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401. The project site is located within 1/4 mile of residences that are to the north and south of the site. Potential impacts to air quality are consistent with the Public Health and Safety Super -Element within the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. During construction, there is the possibility of fugitive dust to be generated from grading the site. The mitigation measures listed under subsection b above and the following mitigation measure will reduce any potential impact to less -than -significant levels. 22) All new development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District's Rule 445, Wood Burning Devices. Rule 445 was adopted in March 2008 to reduce emissions of PM2.s and precludes the installation of indoor or outdoor wood burning devices (i.e. fireplaces/hearths) in new development on or after March 9, 2009. e) Construction odors (Short-term) may include odors associated with equipment use including diesel exhaust or roofing, painting and paving. These odors are temporary and would dissipate rapidly. Operational odors (Long-term) are typically associated with the type of use. Project generated refuse would be stored in covered containers and removed at regular intervals. Odors from the proposed multi -family residential use would most likely be from activities such as cooking; however, these odors would be minimal and not considered to be significant. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: Less Than a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the () Significant Less ( ) Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the Impact Incorporated Impact Impact facilities. According to the SCAQMD, projects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401. The project site is located within 1/4 mile of residences that are to the north and south of the site. Potential impacts to air quality are consistent with the Public Health and Safety Super -Element within the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. During construction, there is the possibility of fugitive dust to be generated from grading the site. The mitigation measures listed under subsection b above and the following mitigation measure will reduce any potential impact to less -than -significant levels. 22) All new development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District's Rule 445, Wood Burning Devices. Rule 445 was adopted in March 2008 to reduce emissions of PM2.s and precludes the installation of indoor or outdoor wood burning devices (i.e. fireplaces/hearths) in new development on or after March 9, 2009. e) Construction odors (Short-term) may include odors associated with equipment use including diesel exhaust or roofing, painting and paving. These odors are temporary and would dissipate rapidly. Operational odors (Long-term) are typically associated with the type of use. Project generated refuse would be stored in covered containers and removed at regular intervals. Odors from the proposed multi -family residential use would most likely be from activities such as cooking; however, these odors would be minimal and not considered to be significant. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the () (✓) () ( ) California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the () (✓) () ( ) California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the () () () (V) Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? () () () (V) Rev 9-29-15 Initial Study for DRC2016-00206, SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and 1JRC2012-00673 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 16 e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? () Less Than (V) ( ) f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat () Significant Less (✓) Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan'? Im•act Incor.oraled Im•act Im.act e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? () () (V) ( ) f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat () () () (✓) Conservation Pian, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan'? Comments: a) The project site is located in an urban area surrounded by properties developed with a mix of land uses. The site has been previously disrupted during the construction of infrastructure and surrounding developments and also by annual discing for weed abatement. According to the General Plan Figure RC -4, and Section 4.4 of the General Plan FPEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources; therefore, development is not anticipated to adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the project is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan. 2003 Biological Evaluation A Habitat Suitability Evaluation (Ecological Sciences, 2003) was prepared for the previous application to develop the project site. The then existing biological conditions include remnant sage scrub vegetation, comprised of a mixture of non-native grassland and sage scrub components. This habitat type occurs in a patchy distribution on the site, primarily within on-site drainages and slopes that have not been exposed to discing activities. The most common native shrubs present within this habitat type are California buckwheat (Eriogonum fasciculatum), California sagebrush (Artemisia callfonica), California broom (Lotus scoparius), and white sage (Saliva apiana). Some of the sage scrub vegetation is highly degraded from invasion of non-native plant species such as star -thistle (Centaura solstitialis), mustard (Brassica and/or Hirschfeldia sp.), ripgut (Bromus diandrus), and foxtail chess (Bromus madritensis ssp. rubens). Additional plant species recorded on-site include dove weed (Eremocarpus sefigerus) and sunflower (Helianthus annuus). Portions of the on-site drainages (primarily the lower areas) also support a mixture of tree and shrub species. Characteristic species include mule fat (Baccharis salicifolia), blue elderberry (Sambucus mexicana), Peruvian pepper (Schinus molle), Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius), fan palm (Washingtonia sp.), poison oak (Toxicodendron diversilobum), tree tobacco (Nicotiana glauca), castor bean (Ricinus communis), fennel (Foeniculum vulgare), and stands of gum tree (Eucalyptus spp.). In addition, the most western drainage supports one or more Targe oak (Quercus sp.) and western sycamore trees (Platanus racemose). Wildlife species directly observed on-site included California towhee (Pipilo crissalis), scrub jay (Aphelocoma coerulescens), Anna's hummingbird (Calypte anna), American crow (Corvus brachyrhynchos), northern mockingbird (Mimus polyglottos), and house finch (Carpodacus mexicanus). Common small mammals recorded, or of which sign was detected, included California ground squirrel (Spermophilus beecheyi), desert cottontail (Sylvllagus auduboni), and pocket gopher (Thomomys bottae). Common reptile species observed included side -blotched lizard (Uta sfansburiana). Rev 9-29-15 P261 Initial Study for DRC2016-00206, SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 17 The level of constraint that a sensitive biological resource would pose to potential developments typically depends on the following criteria: 1) the relative value of that resource; 2) the amount or degree of impact to the resource; 3) whether or not impacts to the resource would be in violation of State and/or federal regulations or laws; 4) whether or not impacts to the resource would require permitting by resources agencies; and 5) the degree to which impacts on the•resource would otherwise be considered "significant" under CEQA. Based on an evaluation using these criteria, existing disturbed/disked areas were considered of a relatively low biological constraint and value given the context in which they occur. This designation is because of the high level of disturbance that has resulted in low biological diversity, absence of special -status plant communities, and overall low potential for special -status species to utilize or reside within these areas. Because no threatened or endangered species are likely to occur in disturbed areas due to the highly disturbed conditions present in a predominantly degraded environment, construction activities in these areas would not likely jeopardize the continued existence of fisted species, nor would construction adversely impact designated critical habitat. Impacts to disturbed areas would also not be expected to substantially affect special -status resources or cause a population of plant or wildlife species to drop below self-sustaining levels, nor would impacts be expected to substantially alter diversity of wildlife in the area due to the current degraded habitat conditions. 2017 Biological Evaluation Update In 2017, a review of the 2003 biological conditions and the Habitat Suitability Evaluation (Ecological Sciences, 2003) was conducted (RCA Associates, 2017) to determine if any significant changes have occurred to the biological resources present on the site since the prior field investigation was conducted. The RCA analysis found the site relatively undisturbed and supporting a grassland community throughout most of the site with trees and shrubs present in the various drainages that bisect the site. The current herbaceous ground cover (2017) is relatively extensive and dense, and covers most of the property. Dominant species include brome grass (Bromus sp.), fiddlenesk (Amsinckia tesse//etta), buckwheat (Eriogonum sp.), filaree (Erodium cicutarium), mustard (Descurania pinnata), wild oats (Avena fatua), eucalyptus (Eucalyptus globulus) hackberry (Celfis sp.) and laurel (Umbellularia sp.). Based on a review of the Habitat Suitability Evaluation (Ecological Sciences, 2003) and a review of data collected by RCA Associates in March 2017, it is of the opinion of RCA Associates that the site conditions observed in 2003 have not changed significantly and sensitive species are unlikely to occur on the site at the present time. Furthermore, the proposed development is not expected to have a significant impact on the biological resources present on the site. Nesting Bird Survey A Nesting Bird Survey was prepared for the project site (RCA Associates, March 2017), which concluded that no active nests were observed and no diagnostic sign (feathers, pellets, fecal material, prey remains, etc.) of current nesting activities was detected during the survey, and that no native and/or non-native bird species recorded during the survey were currently utilizing the site for nesting. The contribution of the project to cumulative biological impacts is not expected to be cumulatively considerable as the project site is within an urban area, is relatively small, and is isolated from areas of better habitat. The Rev 9-29-15 P262 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact incorporated Impact Impact The level of constraint that a sensitive biological resource would pose to potential developments typically depends on the following criteria: 1) the relative value of that resource; 2) the amount or degree of impact to the resource; 3) whether or not impacts to the resource would be in violation of State and/or federal regulations or laws; 4) whether or not impacts to the resource would require permitting by resources agencies; and 5) the degree to which impacts on the•resource would otherwise be considered "significant" under CEQA. Based on an evaluation using these criteria, existing disturbed/disked areas were considered of a relatively low biological constraint and value given the context in which they occur. This designation is because of the high level of disturbance that has resulted in low biological diversity, absence of special -status plant communities, and overall low potential for special -status species to utilize or reside within these areas. Because no threatened or endangered species are likely to occur in disturbed areas due to the highly disturbed conditions present in a predominantly degraded environment, construction activities in these areas would not likely jeopardize the continued existence of fisted species, nor would construction adversely impact designated critical habitat. Impacts to disturbed areas would also not be expected to substantially affect special -status resources or cause a population of plant or wildlife species to drop below self-sustaining levels, nor would impacts be expected to substantially alter diversity of wildlife in the area due to the current degraded habitat conditions. 2017 Biological Evaluation Update In 2017, a review of the 2003 biological conditions and the Habitat Suitability Evaluation (Ecological Sciences, 2003) was conducted (RCA Associates, 2017) to determine if any significant changes have occurred to the biological resources present on the site since the prior field investigation was conducted. The RCA analysis found the site relatively undisturbed and supporting a grassland community throughout most of the site with trees and shrubs present in the various drainages that bisect the site. The current herbaceous ground cover (2017) is relatively extensive and dense, and covers most of the property. Dominant species include brome grass (Bromus sp.), fiddlenesk (Amsinckia tesse//etta), buckwheat (Eriogonum sp.), filaree (Erodium cicutarium), mustard (Descurania pinnata), wild oats (Avena fatua), eucalyptus (Eucalyptus globulus) hackberry (Celfis sp.) and laurel (Umbellularia sp.). Based on a review of the Habitat Suitability Evaluation (Ecological Sciences, 2003) and a review of data collected by RCA Associates in March 2017, it is of the opinion of RCA Associates that the site conditions observed in 2003 have not changed significantly and sensitive species are unlikely to occur on the site at the present time. Furthermore, the proposed development is not expected to have a significant impact on the biological resources present on the site. Nesting Bird Survey A Nesting Bird Survey was prepared for the project site (RCA Associates, March 2017), which concluded that no active nests were observed and no diagnostic sign (feathers, pellets, fecal material, prey remains, etc.) of current nesting activities was detected during the survey, and that no native and/or non-native bird species recorded during the survey were currently utilizing the site for nesting. The contribution of the project to cumulative biological impacts is not expected to be cumulatively considerable as the project site is within an urban area, is relatively small, and is isolated from areas of better habitat. The Rev 9-29-15 P262 Initial Study for DRC2016-00206, SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 18 Nesting Bird Survey did not, identify the presence of burrowing owl activity during the survey, however, due to the potential of the site to contain burrow sites and the ability of owls to begin using the site at any time, a preconstruction clearance survey is recommended prior to site disturbance. The site does contain .a large number of mature trees which have the potential to provide nesting areas for migrating birds. To avoid any impact on nesting birds, it is recommended that a pre -construction nesting bird survey be conducted a maximum 3 days prior to ground breaking activity to avoid impact to birds protected under the Fish and Game Code and the Migratory Bird Act. 1) Three days prior to the removal of vegetation or ground -disturbing activities, a breeding bird survey that is in conformance with the Migratory Bird Act shall be required to determine whether nesting is occurring. Occupied nests shall not be disturbed unless a qualified biologist verifies through non- invasive methods that either (a) the adult birds have not begun egg -laying or incubation; or (b) the juveniles from the occupied nests are foraging independently and are capable of independent survival. If the biologist is unable to verify one of the above conditions, then no disturbance shall occur within 300 feet of non -raptor nests, and within 5,000 feet of raptor nests, during the breeding season to avoid abandonment of the young. If nests are discovered, they shall be avoided through the establishment of an appropriate buffer setback, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. The temporary "no construction" area shall be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and have left the nest, construction in the area may resume. 2) Perform a Burrowing Owl Survey that is in conformance with the Department of Fish and Wildlife Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation and submit the written report outlining,the findings to the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) and the Planning Department within 30 days of groundbreaking activity. The survey shall include a habitat assessment, survey and impact analysis. The Burrowing Owl Survey shall follow' the following protocol: • Burrowing Owl Survey methodology shall be based on Appendix D (Breeding and Non -breeding Season Surveys and Reports) of the CDFW Staff Report. Results of the pre -construction surveyshall be provided to CDFW and the City. If the pre -construction survey does not identify burrowing owls on the project site, then no further mitigation is required. If burrowing owls are found to be utilizing the project site during the pre -construction survey, measures shall be developed by the qualified biologist in coordination with CDFW to avoid Impacting occupied burrows during the nesting period. These measures shall be based on the most current CDFW protocols and will at minimum include establishment of buffer setbacks from occupied burrows and owl monitoring. If ground -disturbing activities are delayed or suspended for more than 30 days after the pre -construction, survey, the site shall be resurveyed for owls. • During the non -breeding season from September 1 through January 31, if burrows are occupied by migratory or non -migratory Rev 9-29-15 P263 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact incorporated Impact Impact Nesting Bird Survey did not, identify the presence of burrowing owl activity during the survey, however, due to the potential of the site to contain burrow sites and the ability of owls to begin using the site at any time, a preconstruction clearance survey is recommended prior to site disturbance. The site does contain .a large number of mature trees which have the potential to provide nesting areas for migrating birds. To avoid any impact on nesting birds, it is recommended that a pre -construction nesting bird survey be conducted a maximum 3 days prior to ground breaking activity to avoid impact to birds protected under the Fish and Game Code and the Migratory Bird Act. 1) Three days prior to the removal of vegetation or ground -disturbing activities, a breeding bird survey that is in conformance with the Migratory Bird Act shall be required to determine whether nesting is occurring. Occupied nests shall not be disturbed unless a qualified biologist verifies through non- invasive methods that either (a) the adult birds have not begun egg -laying or incubation; or (b) the juveniles from the occupied nests are foraging independently and are capable of independent survival. If the biologist is unable to verify one of the above conditions, then no disturbance shall occur within 300 feet of non -raptor nests, and within 5,000 feet of raptor nests, during the breeding season to avoid abandonment of the young. If nests are discovered, they shall be avoided through the establishment of an appropriate buffer setback, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. The temporary "no construction" area shall be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and have left the nest, construction in the area may resume. 2) Perform a Burrowing Owl Survey that is in conformance with the Department of Fish and Wildlife Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation and submit the written report outlining,the findings to the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) and the Planning Department within 30 days of groundbreaking activity. The survey shall include a habitat assessment, survey and impact analysis. The Burrowing Owl Survey shall follow' the following protocol: • Burrowing Owl Survey methodology shall be based on Appendix D (Breeding and Non -breeding Season Surveys and Reports) of the CDFW Staff Report. Results of the pre -construction surveyshall be provided to CDFW and the City. If the pre -construction survey does not identify burrowing owls on the project site, then no further mitigation is required. If burrowing owls are found to be utilizing the project site during the pre -construction survey, measures shall be developed by the qualified biologist in coordination with CDFW to avoid Impacting occupied burrows during the nesting period. These measures shall be based on the most current CDFW protocols and will at minimum include establishment of buffer setbacks from occupied burrows and owl monitoring. If ground -disturbing activities are delayed or suspended for more than 30 days after the pre -construction, survey, the site shall be resurveyed for owls. • During the non -breeding season from September 1 through January 31, if burrows are occupied by migratory or non -migratory Rev 9-29-15 P263 P264 initial Study for DRC2016-00206, SUBTT16605M, 0RC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 19 resident burrowing owls during a pre -construction survey, burrow exclusion and/or closure may be used to exclude owls from those burrows. Burrow exclusion and/or closure should only be conducted by a qualified wildlife biologist in coordination with CDFW using the most current CDFW guidelines. • During the avian nesting season from February 1 through August 31, if nests are discovered, they shall be avoided through establishment of an appropriate buffer setback, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. The temporary "no construction" area would have to be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and have left the nest, construction in the area may resume. b) A Jurisdictional Waters Delineation (RCA Associates, August 2017) was prepared to evaluate five drainage channels that bisect the project site and analyzed the impacts to riverine habitats present along the channels. Based on the results of the delineation and the jurisdictional analysis, it was determined that the five existing channels do not meet the criteria as a Waters of the State or Waters of the United States. The channels do not meet the characteristics that the define them as a nexus to the nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW), which is located approximately 0.4 miles east of the property site. Waters which flow through the five channels flow in a southerly direction and appear to be a direct result of runoff from the development directly north of the site. The Jurisdictional Waters Delineation determined that jurisdictional waters were not present on the site during their field investigations, and that the proposed project will not have an impact to the Waters of the State. The report recommends complying with California Fish and Game Code, Section 1602, prior to issuance of any grading permit. The mitigation provided below will reduce the impact to a less than significant status. 3) Prior to issuance of any grading permit, the Project Applicant shall provide to the City of Rancho Cucamonga either of the following: Written correspondence from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife stating that notification under Section 1602 of the California Fish and Game Code is not required for the project; or a copy of a Department executed Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement, authorizing impacts to California Fish and Game Code, section 1602 resources associated with the project. c) No wetland habitat is present on-site. As a result, project implementation would have no impact on these resources. d) The City is primarily located in an urban area that does not contain large, contiguous natural open space areas. Wildlife potentially may move through the north/south trending tributaries in the northern portion of the City and within the Sphere of Influence. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. e) The Development Code defines heritage trees as all eucalyptus windrows, any tree in excess of thirty feet (30') in height and having a single trunk with a diameter of twenty inches (20") or more, a multi -trunk having a diameter of thirty inches (30") or more, a stand of trees the nature of which makes each dependent upon the others for survival, and any other tree as may be deemed historically or culturally significant because of age, size, condition, or aesthetic qualities. The Arborist Report (Jim Borer, August 2012) evaluated Rev 9-29-15 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting information Sources: Potentially significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact resident burrowing owls during a pre -construction survey, burrow exclusion and/or closure may be used to exclude owls from those burrows. Burrow exclusion and/or closure should only be conducted by a qualified wildlife biologist in coordination with CDFW using the most current CDFW guidelines. • During the avian nesting season from February 1 through August 31, if nests are discovered, they shall be avoided through establishment of an appropriate buffer setback, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. The temporary "no construction" area would have to be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and have left the nest, construction in the area may resume. b) A Jurisdictional Waters Delineation (RCA Associates, August 2017) was prepared to evaluate five drainage channels that bisect the project site and analyzed the impacts to riverine habitats present along the channels. Based on the results of the delineation and the jurisdictional analysis, it was determined that the five existing channels do not meet the criteria as a Waters of the State or Waters of the United States. The channels do not meet the characteristics that the define them as a nexus to the nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW), which is located approximately 0.4 miles east of the property site. Waters which flow through the five channels flow in a southerly direction and appear to be a direct result of runoff from the development directly north of the site. The Jurisdictional Waters Delineation determined that jurisdictional waters were not present on the site during their field investigations, and that the proposed project will not have an impact to the Waters of the State. The report recommends complying with California Fish and Game Code, Section 1602, prior to issuance of any grading permit. The mitigation provided below will reduce the impact to a less than significant status. 3) Prior to issuance of any grading permit, the Project Applicant shall provide to the City of Rancho Cucamonga either of the following: Written correspondence from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife stating that notification under Section 1602 of the California Fish and Game Code is not required for the project; or a copy of a Department executed Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement, authorizing impacts to California Fish and Game Code, section 1602 resources associated with the project. c) No wetland habitat is present on-site. As a result, project implementation would have no impact on these resources. d) The City is primarily located in an urban area that does not contain large, contiguous natural open space areas. Wildlife potentially may move through the north/south trending tributaries in the northern portion of the City and within the Sphere of Influence. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. e) The Development Code defines heritage trees as all eucalyptus windrows, any tree in excess of thirty feet (30') in height and having a single trunk with a diameter of twenty inches (20") or more, a multi -trunk having a diameter of thirty inches (30") or more, a stand of trees the nature of which makes each dependent upon the others for survival, and any other tree as may be deemed historically or culturally significant because of age, size, condition, or aesthetic qualities. The Arborist Report (Jim Borer, August 2012) evaluated Rev 9-29-15 P265 Initial Study for DRC2016-00206, SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 20 a total of 198 trees on the project site. Of those 198 trees, 64 meet Development Code criteria to be classified as Heritage Trees, and 15 of those Heritage Trees were recommended for preservation. The Arborist Report evaluated the location and condition of 56 Coast Live Oak (Quercus agrifolia), 35 California Sycamore (Platanus racemosa), 26 California Pepper (Schinus molle), 24 Blue & Sugar Gum (Eucalyptus species), 15 Elderberry (Sambucus species), 12 Brazilian Pepper (Schinus terebinthifolia), 10 Evergreen Elm (Ulmus parvifolia), 7 Pine (Pinus species), and 13 miscellaneous trees, a total of 198 trees. The 183 trees not identified by the Arborist Report as suitable for preservation are considered over -mature, have poor growth character, have advanced decay, and are in poor general health; many of these trees have further declined in health due to the continued effects of the drought. The applicant proposes to remove these trees (related file: Tree Removal Permit DRC2012-00673). The remaining 15 trees that meet Heritage Tree criteria are recommended for preservation due to their mature form, good growth character, and vigorous health; these trees are principally located north of the Sycamore Inn restaurant. Tree preservation priorities that should be considered include: 1) preserve - in -place healthy trees, 2) if trees cannot be preserved in place, then transplant elsewhere on-site, and as a last resort, 3) remove and replace with largest nursery grown stock available. The developer is proposing to plant numerous new trees, ranging from 15 -gallon to 36 -inch box. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. f) Neither the City, nor the SOI, are within an adopted HCP, NCCP, or other approved State Habitat Conservation Plan area. The project site is not located within a local conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Figure RC -1. No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: Less Than a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064.5? () Significant Less ( ) Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? Impact incorporated impact Impact a total of 198 trees on the project site. Of those 198 trees, 64 meet Development Code criteria to be classified as Heritage Trees, and 15 of those Heritage Trees were recommended for preservation. The Arborist Report evaluated the location and condition of 56 Coast Live Oak (Quercus agrifolia), 35 California Sycamore (Platanus racemosa), 26 California Pepper (Schinus molle), 24 Blue & Sugar Gum (Eucalyptus species), 15 Elderberry (Sambucus species), 12 Brazilian Pepper (Schinus terebinthifolia), 10 Evergreen Elm (Ulmus parvifolia), 7 Pine (Pinus species), and 13 miscellaneous trees, a total of 198 trees. The 183 trees not identified by the Arborist Report as suitable for preservation are considered over -mature, have poor growth character, have advanced decay, and are in poor general health; many of these trees have further declined in health due to the continued effects of the drought. The applicant proposes to remove these trees (related file: Tree Removal Permit DRC2012-00673). The remaining 15 trees that meet Heritage Tree criteria are recommended for preservation due to their mature form, good growth character, and vigorous health; these trees are principally located north of the Sycamore Inn restaurant. Tree preservation priorities that should be considered include: 1) preserve - in -place healthy trees, 2) if trees cannot be preserved in place, then transplant elsewhere on-site, and as a last resort, 3) remove and replace with largest nursery grown stock available. The developer is proposing to plant numerous new trees, ranging from 15 -gallon to 36 -inch box. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. f) Neither the City, nor the SOI, are within an adopted HCP, NCCP, or other approved State Habitat Conservation Plan area. The project site is not located within a local conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Figure RC -1. No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064.5? () (V) () ( ) b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5? () (✓) () ( ) c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? () (✓) () - ( ) d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? () () () (✓) Comments: a) A Historical Assessment of the Sycamore Village Project Site (Van Wormer, May 1990) was utilized in the preparation of the Initial Study for the previously approved applications for the project site (DRC2003-00637 and SUBTT16605) in 2006. The Van Wormer assessment identified the following as a result of research and field survey: 1) the Cucamonga Stage Station Site, 2) the Sycamore Inn, 3) the Red Chief Motel, and 4) the Cucamonga Water Company Reservoir. As part of a later inquiry, the San Bernardino Museum Archaeological Information Center noted the presence of two previously recorded historic bridges (CHS -1786-1 and CHS -1786-6) as well as the old Los Angeles to San Bernardino road route (PS -BR -3-H) adjacent to the project boundaries. At that time, these resources were all outside the then project area and were not impacted by the project. The Rev 9-29-15 Initial Study for DRC2016-00206, SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 21 Cucamonga Station Stage Site is located under the location of what was the Red Chief Motel complex, which was west of the original project boundary. The Sycamore Inn restaurant site was affected on a site-specific impact, since the main access to the residential project was through a signalized intersection into the Sycamore Inn parking lot. The redesign of the project site around the Sycamore Inn restaurant has removed this impact and the integrity of this unique resource will not be adversely impacted. The bridge and road route were previously addressed through the development of the Pacific Electric Trail Bridge and the Route 66 Trailhead improvements. Following the expansion of the project area to include the property west of the Sycamore Inn containing the Red Chief Motel Site a Cultural Resources Assessment (Stadnicki, August 2012) was prepared. The Stadnicki assessment concluded that the "neither the remaining buildings nor the grounds were found to meet the minimum criteria for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources or as a local landmark. The design of the original motel was creative, using Spanish Colonial Revival architectural elements in a way that was distinctive and gave the site visual identity. But with the removal of the original complex and the alterations to the remaining structure it longer conveys its significance or association with Route 66. Because the building and site do not appear to qualify for the California Register, demolition to accommodate the construction of a housing development would not have a significant effect on the environment in the context of historic resources defined by CEQA." As part of the evaluation of the current project site a Cultural Resource Assessment (Applied EarthWorks, May 2017) was prepared. The Applied EarthWorks assessment identified that "a cultural resource literature and records search indicated that three archaeological resources consisting of two prehistoric artifact scatters (P-36-000897 and P-36-000898) and an abandoned historical reservoir (P-36-013927) have been recorded previously within the Project area. In addition, one built -environment resource, the Red Chief Motel (P-36-013931), has been documented within the Project area jStadnicki, August 2012]; this resource was previously recommended as ineligible for listing on the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR) or the Rancho Cucamonga Register of Historical Landmarks (RCRHL)." Additionally, "an intensive cultural resource pedestrian survey of the Project area was performed by Applied EarthWorks archaeologist Justin Castells on April 15, 2017. The historical reservoir (P-36-013927) was revisited during the Phase I survey. Applied EarthWorks identified the reservoir as part of a larger historical irrigation system that also included a weir box and two pump houses. Based on historical research and field observations, Applied EarthWorks concluded that P-36-013927 does not meet the criteria for listing on the CRHR or RCRHL. As part of the fieldwork effort, Applied EarthWorks also revisited the Red Chief Motel (P-36-013931) in order to assess the current condition of the building. As a result of this work, Applied EarthWorks concurred with an earlier significance evaluation that the built -environment resource is not eligible for listing on the CRHR or RCRHL. Finally, the Phase I survey found no evidence of prehistoric artifacts or features within the mapped locations of P-36-000897 or P-36-000898. As the absence of surface archaeological remains does not preclude the possibility that buried cultural materials may be present within the area, Applied EarthWorks recommends that an archaeological monitor is present during ground -disturbing activities that extend into intact native sediments". Refer to Section 17a under Tribal Cultural Resources below regarding archaeological monitoring during ground disturbing activities. The project site has not been identified as a "Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2.24 (Historic Preservation). Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 9-29-15 P266 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact impact Cucamonga Station Stage Site is located under the location of what was the Red Chief Motel complex, which was west of the original project boundary. The Sycamore Inn restaurant site was affected on a site-specific impact, since the main access to the residential project was through a signalized intersection into the Sycamore Inn parking lot. The redesign of the project site around the Sycamore Inn restaurant has removed this impact and the integrity of this unique resource will not be adversely impacted. The bridge and road route were previously addressed through the development of the Pacific Electric Trail Bridge and the Route 66 Trailhead improvements. Following the expansion of the project area to include the property west of the Sycamore Inn containing the Red Chief Motel Site a Cultural Resources Assessment (Stadnicki, August 2012) was prepared. The Stadnicki assessment concluded that the "neither the remaining buildings nor the grounds were found to meet the minimum criteria for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources or as a local landmark. The design of the original motel was creative, using Spanish Colonial Revival architectural elements in a way that was distinctive and gave the site visual identity. But with the removal of the original complex and the alterations to the remaining structure it longer conveys its significance or association with Route 66. Because the building and site do not appear to qualify for the California Register, demolition to accommodate the construction of a housing development would not have a significant effect on the environment in the context of historic resources defined by CEQA." As part of the evaluation of the current project site a Cultural Resource Assessment (Applied EarthWorks, May 2017) was prepared. The Applied EarthWorks assessment identified that "a cultural resource literature and records search indicated that three archaeological resources consisting of two prehistoric artifact scatters (P-36-000897 and P-36-000898) and an abandoned historical reservoir (P-36-013927) have been recorded previously within the Project area. In addition, one built -environment resource, the Red Chief Motel (P-36-013931), has been documented within the Project area jStadnicki, August 2012]; this resource was previously recommended as ineligible for listing on the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR) or the Rancho Cucamonga Register of Historical Landmarks (RCRHL)." Additionally, "an intensive cultural resource pedestrian survey of the Project area was performed by Applied EarthWorks archaeologist Justin Castells on April 15, 2017. The historical reservoir (P-36-013927) was revisited during the Phase I survey. Applied EarthWorks identified the reservoir as part of a larger historical irrigation system that also included a weir box and two pump houses. Based on historical research and field observations, Applied EarthWorks concluded that P-36-013927 does not meet the criteria for listing on the CRHR or RCRHL. As part of the fieldwork effort, Applied EarthWorks also revisited the Red Chief Motel (P-36-013931) in order to assess the current condition of the building. As a result of this work, Applied EarthWorks concurred with an earlier significance evaluation that the built -environment resource is not eligible for listing on the CRHR or RCRHL. Finally, the Phase I survey found no evidence of prehistoric artifacts or features within the mapped locations of P-36-000897 or P-36-000898. As the absence of surface archaeological remains does not preclude the possibility that buried cultural materials may be present within the area, Applied EarthWorks recommends that an archaeological monitor is present during ground -disturbing activities that extend into intact native sediments". Refer to Section 17a under Tribal Cultural Resources below regarding archaeological monitoring during ground disturbing activities. The project site has not been identified as a "Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2.24 (Historic Preservation). Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 9-29-15 P266 Initial Study for DRC2016-00206, SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 22 b) The Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.6). Construction activity, particularly grading, soil excavation, and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources. An Archaeological Assessment of the Sycamore Village Project Site (Del Chario, May 1990) was utilized in the preparation of the Initial Study for the previously approved applications for the project site (DRC2003-00637 and SUBTT16605). The Del Chario report concluded that all exposed ground surfaces within the project area were examined and neither artifacts nor any indication of a subsurface deposit, or midden, was encountered. Because of this, no further prehistoric archaeological investigations were recommended of the Sycamore Village Project Site. Following the expansion of the project area to include the property west of the Sycamore Inn and containing the Red Chief Motel Site a Cultural Resources Assessment (Stadnicki, August 2012) was prepared. The Stadnicki report concluded that the removal of the original complex and the alterations to the remaining front office structure (the current restaurant located directly west of the Sycamore Inn) no longer conveys its significance or association with Route 66, and neither the grounds or the site meet the minimum criteria for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources or as a local landmark. As part of the evaluation of the current project site a Cultural Resource Assessment (Applied EarthWorks, May 2017) was prepared. The Applied EarthWorks assessment identified that "No potentially significant prehistoric or historical cultural resources were identified during the cultural resource survey of the Project area. The survey re-identified two historic period resources (P-36-013927 and P-36-013931) within the Project area and concluded that neither was eligible for listing on the CRHR or the RCRHL. A revisit to the locations of the previously recorded prehistoric sites P-36-000897 and P-36-000898 found no evidence of artifacts or indications of subsurface deposits. As the absence of surface archaeological remains does not preclude the possibility that buried cultural materials may be present within the area, Applied EarthWorks recommends that an archaeological monitor is present during ground -disturbing activities that extend into intact native sediments. It should also be noted that the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians - Kizh Nation identified the project area as being within a highly sensitive village area and requested that a monitor from their tribe be present during all ground disturbing activities. In the event that potentially significant archaeological materials are encountered during project -related construction activities, all work must be halted in the vicinity of the archaeological discovery until a qualified archaeologist can visit the site of discovery and assess the significance of the archaeological resource." The General Plan Final Program Environmental impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of Cultural Resources based on the future build out of the City. The following mitigation measures as identified in the FPEIR shall be implemented: 1) if any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the qualified archaeologist will take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. Rev 9-29-15 P267 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact b) The Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.6). Construction activity, particularly grading, soil excavation, and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources. An Archaeological Assessment of the Sycamore Village Project Site (Del Chario, May 1990) was utilized in the preparation of the Initial Study for the previously approved applications for the project site (DRC2003-00637 and SUBTT16605). The Del Chario report concluded that all exposed ground surfaces within the project area were examined and neither artifacts nor any indication of a subsurface deposit, or midden, was encountered. Because of this, no further prehistoric archaeological investigations were recommended of the Sycamore Village Project Site. Following the expansion of the project area to include the property west of the Sycamore Inn and containing the Red Chief Motel Site a Cultural Resources Assessment (Stadnicki, August 2012) was prepared. The Stadnicki report concluded that the removal of the original complex and the alterations to the remaining front office structure (the current restaurant located directly west of the Sycamore Inn) no longer conveys its significance or association with Route 66, and neither the grounds or the site meet the minimum criteria for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources or as a local landmark. As part of the evaluation of the current project site a Cultural Resource Assessment (Applied EarthWorks, May 2017) was prepared. The Applied EarthWorks assessment identified that "No potentially significant prehistoric or historical cultural resources were identified during the cultural resource survey of the Project area. The survey re-identified two historic period resources (P-36-013927 and P-36-013931) within the Project area and concluded that neither was eligible for listing on the CRHR or the RCRHL. A revisit to the locations of the previously recorded prehistoric sites P-36-000897 and P-36-000898 found no evidence of artifacts or indications of subsurface deposits. As the absence of surface archaeological remains does not preclude the possibility that buried cultural materials may be present within the area, Applied EarthWorks recommends that an archaeological monitor is present during ground -disturbing activities that extend into intact native sediments. It should also be noted that the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians - Kizh Nation identified the project area as being within a highly sensitive village area and requested that a monitor from their tribe be present during all ground disturbing activities. In the event that potentially significant archaeological materials are encountered during project -related construction activities, all work must be halted in the vicinity of the archaeological discovery until a qualified archaeologist can visit the site of discovery and assess the significance of the archaeological resource." The General Plan Final Program Environmental impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of Cultural Resources based on the future build out of the City. The following mitigation measures as identified in the FPEIR shall be implemented: 1) if any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the qualified archaeologist will take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. Rev 9-29-15 P267 Initial Study for DRC2016-00206, SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 23 • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. • Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with Section 21083.2 Archaeological resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, including but not limited to, avoiding archaeological sites, capping or covering sites with soil, planning the site as a park or green space or paying an in-kind mitigation fee. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. c) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4,6) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan. According to the research performed at the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County and the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the Sphere -of - Influence, including the project site; however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources. The older alluvium, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last "Ice Age" and the appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils. The project site is underlain by Quaternary alluvium per the Public Safety Element of the General Plan. Therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (Le., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth -disturbing activities. Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth -disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. Rev 9-29-15 P268 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially significant With Mitigation Than Significant No impact Incorporated Impact Impact • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. • Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with Section 21083.2 Archaeological resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, including but not limited to, avoiding archaeological sites, capping or covering sites with soil, planning the site as a park or green space or paying an in-kind mitigation fee. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. c) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4,6) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan. According to the research performed at the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County and the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the Sphere -of - Influence, including the project site; however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources. The older alluvium, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last "Ice Age" and the appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils. The project site is underlain by Quaternary alluvium per the Public Safety Element of the General Plan. Therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (Le., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth -disturbing activities. Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth -disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. Rev 9-29-15 P268 P269 Initial Study for DRC2016-00206, SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 24 • • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. d) The proposed project is in an area that has already been disturbed by grading, existing on- site and surrounding development. The site has been previously disrupted during the construction of surrounding infrastructure and surrounding developments, the construction of a concrete reservoir facility (abandoned and partially demolished for Foothill Boulevard right-of-way improvements), demolition of the Red Chief Motel (its front office currently used as a restaurant), the parking area of the Red Chief Motel, development of the Sycamore Inn restaurant, and annual discing for weed abatement. No known religious or sacred sites exist within the project area. No evidence is in place to suggest the project site has been used for human burials. The California Health and Safety Code (Section 7050.5) states that if human remains are discovered on-site, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. As adherence to State regulations is required for all development, no mitigation is required in the unlikely event human remains are discovered on-site. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: Less Than i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantia[ evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. () Significant Less (✓) Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially. Significant With Mitigation Than significant No iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? Impact Incorporated Impact Impact • • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. d) The proposed project is in an area that has already been disturbed by grading, existing on- site and surrounding development. The site has been previously disrupted during the construction of surrounding infrastructure and surrounding developments, the construction of a concrete reservoir facility (abandoned and partially demolished for Foothill Boulevard right-of-way improvements), demolition of the Red Chief Motel (its front office currently used as a restaurant), the parking area of the Red Chief Motel, development of the Sycamore Inn restaurant, and annual discing for weed abatement. No known religious or sacred sites exist within the project area. No evidence is in place to suggest the project site has been used for human burials. The California Health and Safety Code (Section 7050.5) states that if human remains are discovered on-site, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. As adherence to State regulations is required for all development, no mitigation is required in the unlikely event human remains are discovered on-site. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantia[ evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. () () () (✓) ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? () () () (✓) iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? () () () (✓) iv) Landslides? () () () V) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? () (✓) () ( ) c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction orcollapse? () () () (✓) d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? () O () (V) Rev 9-29-15 P270 Initial Study for DRC2016-00206, SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 25 e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? () Less Than () (✓) Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potenlially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? () () () (✓) Comments: a) A Geotechnical Engineering Report (Langan Engineering & Environmental Services, February 2015) was prepared for the project site as a geotechnical investigation and fault study. The project site is located both within and adjacent to a proposed special studies zone for the Red Hill Fault. The geotechnical investigation concluded that no known faults pass through the site and it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault, according to the General Plan Figure PS - 2, and Section 4.7 of the General Plan FPEIR. The Red Hill Fault (and Etiwanda Avenue Fault Scarp) lies approximately 1/4 mile south of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 4.5 miles north. These faults are both capable of producing Mw 6.0-7.0 earthquakes. Also, the San Jacinto fault, capable of producing up to Mw 7.5 earthquakes is about 15 miles northeasterly of the site and the San Andreas, capable of up to Mw 8.2 earthquakes, is about 18 miles northeasterly of the site. Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking. Adhering to the Uniform Building Code and Standard Conditions will ensure that geologic impacts are less -than -significant. b) The City of Rancho Cucamonga is within a designated Soil Erosion Control Area Exhibit 4.7-4 of the General Plan FPEIR. The proposed project will require the excavation, stockpiling, and/or movement of on-site soils. The Rancho Cucamonga area is subject to strong Santa Ana wind conditions during September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems. Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust control; however, development of this project under the General Pian would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area as pavement, roads, buildings, and landscaping are established. Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less -than -significant levels: 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil -stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re -planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM10 emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM10 emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil -stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. c) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.7) indicates that there is a potential for the hillside areas at the northern end of the City and in the SOI for slope failure, landslides, and/or erosion. Areas subject to slope instability contain slopes of 30 percent or greater. Rev 9-29-15 P271 Initial Study for DRC2016-00206, SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 26 Landslides may be induced by seismic activity, rain, or construction. The City Hillside Development Regulations prohibits the development within slopes of 30 percent or greater and limit the number of units that could be constructed within the Hillside Residential and Very Low Density Residential designations in the Hillside areas. The related General Plan Amendment application DRC2016-00206 was submitted to amend General Plan policy that prohibits the development of slopes that exceed 30 percent in slope. The Geotechnical Engineering Report (Langan Engineering & Environmental Services, February 2015) finds that slopes are anticipated to be comprised of granular soils. The site is not within an Earthquake hazard zone or other unstable geologic unit or soil type according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-2. Soil types on-site consist of Soboba Gravelly Loamy Sand (SoC)(0 to 9 percent slope), Greenfield Fine Sandy Loam (GtD)(9 to 15 percent slope), and Saugus Sandy Loam (ShF)(30 to 50 percent slope) Soil association according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-3. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The majority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the project site, is located on alluvial soil deposits. These types of soils are not considered to be expansive. Soil types on-site consist of Soboba Gravelly Loamy Sand (S0C)(0 to 9 percent slope), Greenfield Fine Sandy Loam (GtD)(9 to 15 percent slope), and Saugus Sandy Loam (ShF)(30 to 50 percent slope) Soil association according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-3. With adherence to standard building techniques in accordance with the building code, no adverse impacts are anticipated. e) The project will connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal. No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed. No adverse impacts are anticipated. 7. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. Would the project: a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? () Less Than () ( ) b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? O Significant Less ( ) Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Landslides may be induced by seismic activity, rain, or construction. The City Hillside Development Regulations prohibits the development within slopes of 30 percent or greater and limit the number of units that could be constructed within the Hillside Residential and Very Low Density Residential designations in the Hillside areas. The related General Plan Amendment application DRC2016-00206 was submitted to amend General Plan policy that prohibits the development of slopes that exceed 30 percent in slope. The Geotechnical Engineering Report (Langan Engineering & Environmental Services, February 2015) finds that slopes are anticipated to be comprised of granular soils. The site is not within an Earthquake hazard zone or other unstable geologic unit or soil type according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-2. Soil types on-site consist of Soboba Gravelly Loamy Sand (SoC)(0 to 9 percent slope), Greenfield Fine Sandy Loam (GtD)(9 to 15 percent slope), and Saugus Sandy Loam (ShF)(30 to 50 percent slope) Soil association according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-3. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The majority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the project site, is located on alluvial soil deposits. These types of soils are not considered to be expansive. Soil types on-site consist of Soboba Gravelly Loamy Sand (S0C)(0 to 9 percent slope), Greenfield Fine Sandy Loam (GtD)(9 to 15 percent slope), and Saugus Sandy Loam (ShF)(30 to 50 percent slope) Soil association according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-3. With adherence to standard building techniques in accordance with the building code, no adverse impacts are anticipated. e) The project will connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal. No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed. No adverse impacts are anticipated. 7. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. Would the project: a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? () (J) () ( ) b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? O O V) ( ) Comments: a) Regulations and Significance —The Federal government began studying the phenomenon of global warming as early as 1979 with the National Climate Protection Act (92 Stat. 601). In June of 2005, Governor Schwarzenegger established California's Green House Gas (GHG) emissions reduction target in Executive Order (EO) S-3-05. The EO created goals to reduce GHG emissions for the State of California to 2000 levels by 2010; GHG emissions reduced to 1990 levels by 2020; and GHG emissions reduced to 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050. Additionally, on December 7, 2009, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) issued findings regarding GHGs under rule 202(a) of the Clean Air Act: (1) that GHGs endanger human health; and (2) that this will be the first steps to regulating GHGs through the Federal Clean Air Act. The USEPA defines 6 key GHGs (carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N20), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6)). The combined emissions of these well -mixed greenhouse gases from new motor vehicles and engines contribute to GHG pollution. Rev 9-29-15 Initial Study for DRC2016-00206, SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 27 The western states, including Arizona, California, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, and Washington, already experience hotter, drier climates. California is a substantial contributor of GHGs and is expected to see an increase of 3 to 4 degrees Fahrenheit (°F) over the next century. Assembly Bill (AB) 32 requires that the California Air Resources Board (ARB), the lead agency for implementing AB 32, determine what the statewide GHG emission level was in 1990 and approve a statewide GHG emissions limit (427 million metric tons of CO2 equivalent) to be achieved by 2020 and prepare a Scoping Plan to outline the main strategies for meeting the 2020 deadline. Significant progress can be made toward the 2020 goal through existing technologies and improving the efficiency of energy use. Other solutions would include improving the State's infrastructure, and transitioning to cleaner and more efficient sources of energy. The ARB estimates that 38 percent of the State's GHG emissions in 2004 was from transportation sources followed by electricity generation (both in -State and out -of -State) at 28 percent and industrial at 20 percent. Residential and commercial activities account for 9 percent, agricultural uses at 6 percent, high global warming potential gases at 3 percent, and recycling and waste at 1 percent. It is not anticipated that any single development project would have a substantial effect on global climate change but that GHG emissions from the project would combine with emissions across California, the United States, and the world to cumulatively contribute to global climate change. Therefore, consistent with the ARB's Climate Change Scoping Plan, the proposed project was evaluated for consistency with the Early Action Measures (Scoping Plan is a recommendation until adopted through normal rulemaking). The proposed project is assessed by determining its consistency with the 37 Recommended Actions identified by ARB. 1n compliance with Senate Bill (SB) 97 and CEQA, the project has been analyzed based on a qualitative analysis (CEQA 15064.4). Additionally, the ARB was directed through SB 375 to develop regional GHG emission reduction targets to be achieved within the automobile and light truck sectors for 2020 and 2035. SCAQMD and ARB maintain ambient air quality monitoring stations in the Basin. The stations closest to the project site are the Upland station and the Fontana -Arrow Highway station. The Upland station monitors all criteria pollutants except PM,o, PM2.5, and SO2 which are monitored at the Fontana -Arrow Highway station. The ambient air quality in the project area for CO, NO2, and SO2 are consistently below the relevant State and Federal standards (based on ARB and EPA from 2007, 2008, and 2009 readings). Ozone, PM1o, and PM2.5 levels all exceed State and Federal standards regularly. Project Related Sources of GHG's — Based on the Guidelines for the Implementation of California Environmental Quality Act, Appendix G, a project would normally be considered to have a significant effect on air quality if the project would violate any ambient air quality standards, contribute substantially to an existing air quality violation, expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations, or conflict with adopted environmental plans and goals of the community. However, neither the CEQA statutes, Office of Planning and Research (OPR) guidelines, nor the draft proposed changes to the CEQA Guidelines prescribe thresholds of significance or a particular methodology for performing an impact analysis. Significance criteria are left to the judgment and discretion of the Lead Agency. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has not adopted a threshold of significance for GHG emissions. However, a screening threshold of 3,000 MTCO2e per year is based upon Rev 9-29-15 P272 Less Than Significant Loss Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact The western states, including Arizona, California, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, and Washington, already experience hotter, drier climates. California is a substantial contributor of GHGs and is expected to see an increase of 3 to 4 degrees Fahrenheit (°F) over the next century. Assembly Bill (AB) 32 requires that the California Air Resources Board (ARB), the lead agency for implementing AB 32, determine what the statewide GHG emission level was in 1990 and approve a statewide GHG emissions limit (427 million metric tons of CO2 equivalent) to be achieved by 2020 and prepare a Scoping Plan to outline the main strategies for meeting the 2020 deadline. Significant progress can be made toward the 2020 goal through existing technologies and improving the efficiency of energy use. Other solutions would include improving the State's infrastructure, and transitioning to cleaner and more efficient sources of energy. The ARB estimates that 38 percent of the State's GHG emissions in 2004 was from transportation sources followed by electricity generation (both in -State and out -of -State) at 28 percent and industrial at 20 percent. Residential and commercial activities account for 9 percent, agricultural uses at 6 percent, high global warming potential gases at 3 percent, and recycling and waste at 1 percent. It is not anticipated that any single development project would have a substantial effect on global climate change but that GHG emissions from the project would combine with emissions across California, the United States, and the world to cumulatively contribute to global climate change. Therefore, consistent with the ARB's Climate Change Scoping Plan, the proposed project was evaluated for consistency with the Early Action Measures (Scoping Plan is a recommendation until adopted through normal rulemaking). The proposed project is assessed by determining its consistency with the 37 Recommended Actions identified by ARB. 1n compliance with Senate Bill (SB) 97 and CEQA, the project has been analyzed based on a qualitative analysis (CEQA 15064.4). Additionally, the ARB was directed through SB 375 to develop regional GHG emission reduction targets to be achieved within the automobile and light truck sectors for 2020 and 2035. SCAQMD and ARB maintain ambient air quality monitoring stations in the Basin. The stations closest to the project site are the Upland station and the Fontana -Arrow Highway station. The Upland station monitors all criteria pollutants except PM,o, PM2.5, and SO2 which are monitored at the Fontana -Arrow Highway station. The ambient air quality in the project area for CO, NO2, and SO2 are consistently below the relevant State and Federal standards (based on ARB and EPA from 2007, 2008, and 2009 readings). Ozone, PM1o, and PM2.5 levels all exceed State and Federal standards regularly. Project Related Sources of GHG's — Based on the Guidelines for the Implementation of California Environmental Quality Act, Appendix G, a project would normally be considered to have a significant effect on air quality if the project would violate any ambient air quality standards, contribute substantially to an existing air quality violation, expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations, or conflict with adopted environmental plans and goals of the community. However, neither the CEQA statutes, Office of Planning and Research (OPR) guidelines, nor the draft proposed changes to the CEQA Guidelines prescribe thresholds of significance or a particular methodology for performing an impact analysis. Significance criteria are left to the judgment and discretion of the Lead Agency. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has not adopted a threshold of significance for GHG emissions. However, a screening threshold of 3,000 MTCO2e per year is based upon Rev 9-29-15 P272 Initial Study for DRC2016-00206, SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 28 South Coast Air Quality Management District staff's proposed GHG screening threshold for stationary sources emissions for non -industrial projects, as described in the SCAQMD's Interim CEQA GHG Significance Threshold for Stationary Sources, Rules, and Plans. Project related GHG's would include emissions from direct and indirect sources. Based on the Greenhouse Gas Assessment (Landrum & Brown, July 2015), total project related emissions would be 1,982 MTCO2eq/year, as shown in the following table: Total Construction CO2 Emissions Activity Annual Emissions (MT/Year) CO2 CH4 N20 CO2EQ Demolition 38.9 0.01 0.00 39.1 Site Preparation 19.3 0.01 0.00 19.4 Grading 134.4 0.03 0.00 135.1 Construction (2016) 39.9 0.01 0.00 40.1 Construction (2017) 508.4 0.08 0.00 510.2 Construction (2018) 172.5 0.03 0.00 173.1 Painting 21.7 0.01 0.00 21.9 Paving 4.8 0.00 0.00 4.8 Total Emissions 940.1 0.17 0.00 943.7 Project Life Average Annual Construction Emissions 31.3 0.01 0.00 31.5 'Bat3rd on 3t:i Year F'ro)ett Life SCAQMD Significance Thr_:hptd; Annual Project CO2 Emissions Activity Annual Emissions (MT/yr) CO2 CHS N20 CO2EQ Vehicular Emissions 1,434.4 0.05 0.00 1,435.5 Natural Gas Combustion 109.1 0.00 0.00 190.3 Electricity 240.0 0.01 0.00 241.0 Landscaping 2.9 0.00 0.00 3.0 Consumer Products 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 Architectural Coatings 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 Municipal Waste 16.1 0.95 0.00 36.0 Water 67.8 0.37 0.01 78.4 Total Emissions Annualized Construction Emissions 1,950.3 1.39 0.01 1,984.1 31.3 0.01 0.00 31.5 Total Annual Project Emissions 1,981.6 1.39 0.01 2,015.5 Screening Threshold: 3,000 Exceed Threshold? No Rev 9-29-15 P273 Less Than Significant Less Potentially with Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated impact Impact South Coast Air Quality Management District staff's proposed GHG screening threshold for stationary sources emissions for non -industrial projects, as described in the SCAQMD's Interim CEQA GHG Significance Threshold for Stationary Sources, Rules, and Plans. Project related GHG's would include emissions from direct and indirect sources. Based on the Greenhouse Gas Assessment (Landrum & Brown, July 2015), total project related emissions would be 1,982 MTCO2eq/year, as shown in the following table: Total Construction CO2 Emissions Activity Annual Emissions (MT/Year) CO2 CH4 N20 CO2EQ Demolition 38.9 0.01 0.00 39.1 Site Preparation 19.3 0.01 0.00 19.4 Grading 134.4 0.03 0.00 135.1 Construction (2016) 39.9 0.01 0.00 40.1 Construction (2017) 508.4 0.08 0.00 510.2 Construction (2018) 172.5 0.03 0.00 173.1 Painting 21.7 0.01 0.00 21.9 Paving 4.8 0.00 0.00 4.8 Total Emissions 940.1 0.17 0.00 943.7 Project Life Average Annual Construction Emissions 31.3 0.01 0.00 31.5 'Bat3rd on 3t:i Year F'ro)ett Life SCAQMD Significance Thr_:hptd; Annual Project CO2 Emissions Activity Annual Emissions (MT/yr) CO2 CHS N20 CO2EQ Vehicular Emissions 1,434.4 0.05 0.00 1,435.5 Natural Gas Combustion 109.1 0.00 0.00 190.3 Electricity 240.0 0.01 0.00 241.0 Landscaping 2.9 0.00 0.00 3.0 Consumer Products 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 Architectural Coatings 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 Municipal Waste 16.1 0.95 0.00 36.0 Water 67.8 0.37 0.01 78.4 Total Emissions Annualized Construction Emissions 1,950.3 1.39 0.01 1,984.1 31.3 0.01 0.00 31.5 Total Annual Project Emissions 1,981.6 1.39 0.01 2,015.5 Screening Threshold: 3,000 Exceed Threshold? No Rev 9-29-15 P273 Initial Study for DRC2016-00206, SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 29 As shown in the table, direct and indirect operational emissions associated with the project as compared to the SCAQMD's interim threshold of significance of 3,000 MTCO2e per year would result in a less than significant impact with respect to GHG emissions. Cumulative Short Term (Construction) GHG Emissions — The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.5) indicates that GHG emissions result from construction activities associated with diesel -powered construction equipment and other combustion sources (i.e. Generators, workers vehicles, material delivery, etc.). The GHG emitted by construction equipment is primarily carbon dioxide (CO2). The highest levels of construction related GHG's occur during site preparation including demolition, grading and excavation. Construction related GHG's are also emitted from off-site haul trucks and construction workers traveling to the job site. Exhaust emissions from construction activities would vary each day with the changes in construction activity on site. The combustion of fossil -based fuels creates GHG's such as CO2, Ch4, and N20. CH4 is emitted during the fueling of heavy equipment. Based on the Greenhouse Gas Assessment (Landrum & Brown, July 2015), no significant impacts to GHGs from short-term construction impacts would occur as a result of the project as shown in the table above. Because the project would result in minimal emissions that do not exceed the SCAQMD's interim threshold of significance, the project's contribution to cumulative impacts is also considered minimal. The proposed project would have less than a significant short-term cumulative impact with implementation of the following enforceable actions, which are included as mitigation measures in accordance with Mitigation Measure 4.5-1 of the 2010 General Plan Update FPEIR: 1) The project must comply with all rules that assist in reducing short-term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAQMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil -stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 2) The construction contractor shall select construction equipment based on low -emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures' specification. 3) Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 minutes. 4) Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline- or diesel -powered engines where feasible. 5) Construction should be timed so as not to interfere with peak -hour traffic. 6) Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be supported and encouraged for the construction crew. Cumulative Long Term (Operational) GHG's Emissions — The primary source of GHG emissions generated by the proposed project would be from motor vehicles,, combustion of natural gas for space and water heating, as well as off-site GHG emissions from generation of electricity consumed by the proposed land use development over a long term. CEQA requires the Lead Agency to review the project for "adequacy, completeness, and a good faith effort at full disclosure," to determine potential impacts of GHG's. Therefore the project has been analyzed based on methodologies and information available to the Rev 9-29-15 P274 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact As shown in the table, direct and indirect operational emissions associated with the project as compared to the SCAQMD's interim threshold of significance of 3,000 MTCO2e per year would result in a less than significant impact with respect to GHG emissions. Cumulative Short Term (Construction) GHG Emissions — The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.5) indicates that GHG emissions result from construction activities associated with diesel -powered construction equipment and other combustion sources (i.e. Generators, workers vehicles, material delivery, etc.). The GHG emitted by construction equipment is primarily carbon dioxide (CO2). The highest levels of construction related GHG's occur during site preparation including demolition, grading and excavation. Construction related GHG's are also emitted from off-site haul trucks and construction workers traveling to the job site. Exhaust emissions from construction activities would vary each day with the changes in construction activity on site. The combustion of fossil -based fuels creates GHG's such as CO2, Ch4, and N20. CH4 is emitted during the fueling of heavy equipment. Based on the Greenhouse Gas Assessment (Landrum & Brown, July 2015), no significant impacts to GHGs from short-term construction impacts would occur as a result of the project as shown in the table above. Because the project would result in minimal emissions that do not exceed the SCAQMD's interim threshold of significance, the project's contribution to cumulative impacts is also considered minimal. The proposed project would have less than a significant short-term cumulative impact with implementation of the following enforceable actions, which are included as mitigation measures in accordance with Mitigation Measure 4.5-1 of the 2010 General Plan Update FPEIR: 1) The project must comply with all rules that assist in reducing short-term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAQMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil -stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 2) The construction contractor shall select construction equipment based on low -emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures' specification. 3) Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 minutes. 4) Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline- or diesel -powered engines where feasible. 5) Construction should be timed so as not to interfere with peak -hour traffic. 6) Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be supported and encouraged for the construction crew. Cumulative Long Term (Operational) GHG's Emissions — The primary source of GHG emissions generated by the proposed project would be from motor vehicles,, combustion of natural gas for space and water heating, as well as off-site GHG emissions from generation of electricity consumed by the proposed land use development over a long term. CEQA requires the Lead Agency to review the project for "adequacy, completeness, and a good faith effort at full disclosure," to determine potential impacts of GHG's. Therefore the project has been analyzed based on methodologies and information available to the Rev 9-29-15 P274 Initial Study for DRC2016-00206, SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 30 City at the time this document was prepared. Estimates are based on past performance and represent a scenario that is a worst case with the understanding that technology changes may reduce GHG emissions in the future. To date, there is no established quantified GHG emission threshold. The project proposes to amend the General Plan to permit development on slopes 30 percent and greater, the subdivision of a 24.19 acre site into 6 parcels, and the development of 175 condominium units (including 9 live -work units) in the Mixed Use (MU) District. The project site characterized by the existing condominiums, vacant land and golf course land uses to the north, residential and commercial land uses to the west, the Pacific Electric Trail and Route 66 Trailhead to the east, and residential and commercial land uses to the south. The proposed project will incorporate several design features that are consistent with the California Office of the Attorney General's recommended measures to reduce GHG emission including: water efficient landscaping, shade trees, and walkways that provide accessibility to public sidewalks. The project is consistent with the California Environmental Protection Agency Climate Action Team proposed early action measures to mitigate climate change included in the CARB Scoping Plan mandated under AB 32. The proposed project will incorporate several design features including: water efficient landscaping, shade trees, and walkways that provide accessibility to public sidewalks. Additionally, the City is participating in the development of a Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) with SANBAG for the San Bernardino County area pursuant to Senate Bill (SB) 375. Based on the Greenhouse Gas Assessment (Landrum & Brown, July 2015), no significant impacts to GHGs from long-term, operational impacts would occur as a result of the project as shown in the table above. Because the project would result in minimal emissions that do not exceed the SCAQMD's interim threshold of significance, the project's contribution to cumulative impacts is also considered minimal. The proposed project would have less than a significant long-term,operational impact with implementation of the following enforceable actions, which re included as mitigation measures in accordance with Mitigation Measure 4.5-1 of the 2010 General Plan Update FPEIR: 7) Construction and Building materials shall be produced and/or manufactured locally. Use "Green Building Materials" such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low -volatile -organic -compound (VOC) materials. 8) Design all buildings to exceed California Building Code Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of: • Increased insulation. • Limit air leakage through the structure. Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances. • Landscape and develop site utilizing shade, prevailing winds and landscaping. Rev 9-29-15 P275 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact City at the time this document was prepared. Estimates are based on past performance and represent a scenario that is a worst case with the understanding that technology changes may reduce GHG emissions in the future. To date, there is no established quantified GHG emission threshold. The project proposes to amend the General Plan to permit development on slopes 30 percent and greater, the subdivision of a 24.19 acre site into 6 parcels, and the development of 175 condominium units (including 9 live -work units) in the Mixed Use (MU) District. The project site characterized by the existing condominiums, vacant land and golf course land uses to the north, residential and commercial land uses to the west, the Pacific Electric Trail and Route 66 Trailhead to the east, and residential and commercial land uses to the south. The proposed project will incorporate several design features that are consistent with the California Office of the Attorney General's recommended measures to reduce GHG emission including: water efficient landscaping, shade trees, and walkways that provide accessibility to public sidewalks. The project is consistent with the California Environmental Protection Agency Climate Action Team proposed early action measures to mitigate climate change included in the CARB Scoping Plan mandated under AB 32. The proposed project will incorporate several design features including: water efficient landscaping, shade trees, and walkways that provide accessibility to public sidewalks. Additionally, the City is participating in the development of a Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) with SANBAG for the San Bernardino County area pursuant to Senate Bill (SB) 375. Based on the Greenhouse Gas Assessment (Landrum & Brown, July 2015), no significant impacts to GHGs from long-term, operational impacts would occur as a result of the project as shown in the table above. Because the project would result in minimal emissions that do not exceed the SCAQMD's interim threshold of significance, the project's contribution to cumulative impacts is also considered minimal. The proposed project would have less than a significant long-term,operational impact with implementation of the following enforceable actions, which re included as mitigation measures in accordance with Mitigation Measure 4.5-1 of the 2010 General Plan Update FPEIR: 7) Construction and Building materials shall be produced and/or manufactured locally. Use "Green Building Materials" such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low -volatile -organic -compound (VOC) materials. 8) Design all buildings to exceed California Building Code Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of: • Increased insulation. • Limit air leakage through the structure. Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances. • Landscape and develop site utilizing shade, prevailing winds and landscaping. Rev 9-29-15 P275 P276 Initial Study for DRC2016-00206, SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 31 • Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems. • Install light colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements. • install solar or light emitting diodes (LED's) for outdoor lighting. 9) Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and include the following: • Installwater efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. • Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available or as required by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD). • Design building to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets, dual flush toilets and waterless urinals/water heaters. • Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non- vegetated surfaces. 10) Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educate employees about reducing waste and about recycling. b) No other applicable plans, policies, or regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emission apply to the project. The 2010 General Plan Update includes adopted policies and Standard Conditions that respond to the Attorney General and the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA). The General Plan policies and Standard Conditions guide infill and sustainable development reliant on pedestrian connections, re- use and rehabilitation of existing structures, link transportation opportunities, promote development that is sensitive to natural resources and incentivizes denser mixed use projects that maximizes diverse opportunities. The proposed project includes water efficient landscaping, shade trees, and walkways that provide accessibility to public sidewalks and therefore is consistent with the sustainability and climate change policies of the General Plan. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of GHG's and determined that GHG emissions would be cumulatively considerable, which would be a significant, unavoidable adverse cumulative. impact. A Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. Based on the Greenhouse Gas Assessment (Landrum & Brown, July 2015), no significant impacts to GHGs from short-term, construction impacts or long-term, operational impacts would occur as a result of the project. Because the project would result in minimal emissions that do not exceed the SCAQMD's interim threshold of significance, the project's contribution to GHGs from short-term construction and long-term operational cumulative impacts is also considered minimal. With implementation of the mitigation measures listed in subsection a), less than significant impacts would occur as a result of the project. In addition, the proposed project would not hinder the State's GHG reduction goals established by AB 32 and therefore would be less than a significant impact. Rev 9-29-15 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: significant Mitigation Significant No impact Incorporated Impact Impact • Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems. • Install light colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements. • install solar or light emitting diodes (LED's) for outdoor lighting. 9) Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and include the following: • Installwater efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. • Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available or as required by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD). • Design building to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets, dual flush toilets and waterless urinals/water heaters. • Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non- vegetated surfaces. 10) Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educate employees about reducing waste and about recycling. b) No other applicable plans, policies, or regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emission apply to the project. The 2010 General Plan Update includes adopted policies and Standard Conditions that respond to the Attorney General and the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA). The General Plan policies and Standard Conditions guide infill and sustainable development reliant on pedestrian connections, re- use and rehabilitation of existing structures, link transportation opportunities, promote development that is sensitive to natural resources and incentivizes denser mixed use projects that maximizes diverse opportunities. The proposed project includes water efficient landscaping, shade trees, and walkways that provide accessibility to public sidewalks and therefore is consistent with the sustainability and climate change policies of the General Plan. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of GHG's and determined that GHG emissions would be cumulatively considerable, which would be a significant, unavoidable adverse cumulative. impact. A Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. Based on the Greenhouse Gas Assessment (Landrum & Brown, July 2015), no significant impacts to GHGs from short-term, construction impacts or long-term, operational impacts would occur as a result of the project. Because the project would result in minimal emissions that do not exceed the SCAQMD's interim threshold of significance, the project's contribution to GHGs from short-term construction and long-term operational cumulative impacts is also considered minimal. With implementation of the mitigation measures listed in subsection a), less than significant impacts would occur as a result of the project. In addition, the proposed project would not hinder the State's GHG reduction goals established by AB 32 and therefore would be less than a significant impact. Rev 9-29-15 P277 Initial Study for DRC2016-00206, SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, 0RC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 32 8. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? () Less Than () (/) b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? () Significant Less (✓) Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? Impact incorporated Impact Impact 8. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? () () () (/) b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? () () () (✓) c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 114 mile of an existing or proposed school? () () O V) d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? () () () (✓) e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? () () () (✓) f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? () () () (✓) g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? () () O V) h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? () () () (✓) Comments: a) Development within the City may utilize or generate hazardous materials or wastes. This is usually associated with individual households, small business operations, and maintenance activities like paints, cleaning solvents, fertilizers, and motor oil or through construction activities that would use paints, solvents, acids, curing compounds, grease, and oils. These materials would be stored and used at individual sites. The proposed project is located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between San Bernardino Road and Baker Avenue in a hillside area on the southerly flank of Red Hill and surrounding the historic Sycamore Inn restaurant. The project proposes to amend the General Plan to permit development on slopes 30 percent and greater, the subdivision of a 24.19 acre site into 6 parcels, and the development of 175 condominium units (including 9 live -work units) in the Mixed Use (MU) District. The project site characterized by the existing condominiums, vacant land and golf course land uses to the north, residential and commercial land uses to the west, the Pacific Electric Trail and Route 66 Trailhead to the east, and residential and commercial land uses to the south. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition, which is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Rev 9-29-15 P278 Initial Study for DRC2016-00206, SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 33 Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the State. The City has an Emergency Operations Plan that meets State and Federal requirements and is in the process of updating the approved 2005 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will reduce the potentia! for significant impacts to a level less -than - significant. Therefore, no adverse impacts are expected. b) The proposed project does not include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition, which is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the State. The City has an Emergency Operations Plan that meets State and Federal requirements and is in the process of updating the approved 2005 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less -than -significant. Therefore, no adverse impacts are expected. c) The project site is located within % mile of a sensitive receptor — residences to the north and south; however, the uses proposed do not create objectionable odors. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The proposed project is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site. A site inspection in March 2016 did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials. Therefore, no impact is anticipated. e) The site is located within an airport land use plan (the Ontario Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP)) according to the General Plan Figure PS -7 and General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.8-1; however, the site is not within 2 miles of a public airport. The project site is located approximately 3 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. The project is compliant with the height limits of the ALUCP. Therefore, no impact is anticipated. f) There are no private airstrips within the City. The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 and 1/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. Therefore, no impact is anticipated. g) The City has a developed roadway network that provides emergency access and evacuation routes to existing development. New development will be located on a site that has access to existing roadways. The City's Emergency Operation Plan, which is updated every 3 years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in the event of a disaster. Because the project includes at least two points of public street access and is required to comply with all applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances, no adverse impacts are anticipated. h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from wind -driven fires in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone found in the northern part of the City; however, the proposed project site is not located within a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone according to General Plan Figure PS -1. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 9-29-15 Less Than r Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the State. The City has an Emergency Operations Plan that meets State and Federal requirements and is in the process of updating the approved 2005 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will reduce the potentia! for significant impacts to a level less -than - significant. Therefore, no adverse impacts are expected. b) The proposed project does not include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition, which is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the State. The City has an Emergency Operations Plan that meets State and Federal requirements and is in the process of updating the approved 2005 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less -than -significant. Therefore, no adverse impacts are expected. c) The project site is located within % mile of a sensitive receptor — residences to the north and south; however, the uses proposed do not create objectionable odors. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The proposed project is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site. A site inspection in March 2016 did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials. Therefore, no impact is anticipated. e) The site is located within an airport land use plan (the Ontario Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP)) according to the General Plan Figure PS -7 and General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.8-1; however, the site is not within 2 miles of a public airport. The project site is located approximately 3 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. The project is compliant with the height limits of the ALUCP. Therefore, no impact is anticipated. f) There are no private airstrips within the City. The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 and 1/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. Therefore, no impact is anticipated. g) The City has a developed roadway network that provides emergency access and evacuation routes to existing development. New development will be located on a site that has access to existing roadways. The City's Emergency Operation Plan, which is updated every 3 years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in the event of a disaster. Because the project includes at least two points of public street access and is required to comply with all applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances, no adverse impacts are anticipated. h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from wind -driven fires in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone found in the northern part of the City; however, the proposed project site is not located within a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone according to General Plan Figure PS -1. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 9-29-15 Initial Study for DRC2016-00206, SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 34 9. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? () Less Than () ( ) b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? () Signlficant Less (✓) Issues and Supporting information Sources: Potentially significant With Mitigation Than Significant No d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on- or off-site? Impact Incorporated _ Impact Impact 9. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? () (✓) () ( ) b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? () () () (✓) c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? () () () (✓) d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on- or off-site? () ( ) () (✓) e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? () () () (✓) f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? () () () (V) g) Place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area as mapped on a Federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? () () () (✓) h) Place within a 100 -year flood hazard area structures that would impede or redirect flood flows? () () () (✓) 1) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? () () () (✓) 3) ,Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? () () () (V) Comments: a) Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD). The project is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems. The State of California is authorized to administer various aspects of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act. The General Construction Permit treats any construction activity over 1 acre as an industrial activity, requiring a permit under the State's General NPDES permit. The State Water Resource Control Board (SWRCB), through the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), Santa Ana Region, administers these permits. Construction activities covered under the Skate's General Construction permit include removal of vegetation, grading, excavating, or any other activity for new development or Rev 9-29-15 P279 Initial Study for DRC2016-00206, SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 35 significant redevelopment. Prior to commencement of construction of a project, a discharger must submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to obtain coverage under the General Permit. The General Permit requires all dischargers to comply with the following during construction activities, including site clearance and grading: Develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that would specify Best Management Practices (BMPs) to prevent construction pollutants from contacting storm water and with the intent of keeping all products of erosion from moving off-site into receiving waters. Eliminate or reduce non -storm water discharges to storm sewer systems and other waters of the nation. Perform inspections of all BMPs. Waste discharges include discharges of storm water and construction project discharges. A construction project for new development or significant redevelopment requires an NPDES permit. Construction project proponents are required to prepare an SWPPP. To comply with the NPDES, the project's construction contractor will be required to prepare an SWPPP during construction activities, and a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for post -construction operational management of storm water runoff. The applicant has submitted a WQMP (David Evans and Associates, April 2017), which identifies BMPs to minimize the amount of pollutants, such as eroded soils, entering the drainage system after construction. Runoff from driveways, roads and other impermeable surfaces must be controlled through an on-site drainage system. BMPs include both structural and non- structural control methods. Structural controls used to manage storm water pollutant levels include detention basins, oil/grit separators, and porous pavement. Non-structural controls focus on controlling pollutants at the source, generally through implementing erosion and sediment control plans, and various Business Plans that must be developed by any businesses that store and use hazardous materials. Practices such as periodic parking lot sweeping can substantially reduce the amount of pollutants entering the storm drain system. The following mitigation measures are required to control additional storm water effluent: Construction Activities: 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing' of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. Rev 9-29-15 P280 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting information Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact significant redevelopment. Prior to commencement of construction of a project, a discharger must submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to obtain coverage under the General Permit. The General Permit requires all dischargers to comply with the following during construction activities, including site clearance and grading: Develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that would specify Best Management Practices (BMPs) to prevent construction pollutants from contacting storm water and with the intent of keeping all products of erosion from moving off-site into receiving waters. Eliminate or reduce non -storm water discharges to storm sewer systems and other waters of the nation. Perform inspections of all BMPs. Waste discharges include discharges of storm water and construction project discharges. A construction project for new development or significant redevelopment requires an NPDES permit. Construction project proponents are required to prepare an SWPPP. To comply with the NPDES, the project's construction contractor will be required to prepare an SWPPP during construction activities, and a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for post -construction operational management of storm water runoff. The applicant has submitted a WQMP (David Evans and Associates, April 2017), which identifies BMPs to minimize the amount of pollutants, such as eroded soils, entering the drainage system after construction. Runoff from driveways, roads and other impermeable surfaces must be controlled through an on-site drainage system. BMPs include both structural and non- structural control methods. Structural controls used to manage storm water pollutant levels include detention basins, oil/grit separators, and porous pavement. Non-structural controls focus on controlling pollutants at the source, generally through implementing erosion and sediment control plans, and various Business Plans that must be developed by any businesses that store and use hazardous materials. Practices such as periodic parking lot sweeping can substantially reduce the amount of pollutants entering the storm drain system. The following mitigation measures are required to control additional storm water effluent: Construction Activities: 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing' of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. Rev 9-29-15 P280 Initial Study for DRC2016-00206, SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 35 significant redevelopment. Prior to commencement of construction of a project, a discharger must submit a Notice of Intent (NO1) to obtain coverage under the General Permit. The General Permit requires all dischargers to comply with the following during construction activities, including site clearance and grading: • Develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that would specify Best Management Practices (BMPs) to prevent construction pollutants from contacting storm water and with the intent of keeping all products of erosion from moving off-site into receiving waters. • Eliminate or reduce non -storm water discharges to storm sewer systems and other waters of the nation. • Perform inspections of all BMPs. Waste discharges include discharges of storm water and construction project discharges. A construction project for new development or significant redevelopment requires an NPDES permit. Construction project proponents are required to prepare an SWPPP. To comply with the NPDES, the project's construction contractor will be required to prepare an SWPPP during construction activities, and a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for post -construction operational management of storm water runoff. The applicant has submitted a WQMP (David Evans and Associates, April 2017), which identifies BMPs to minimize the amount of pollutants, such as eroded soils, entering the drainage system after construction. Runoff from driveways, roads and other impermeable surfaces must be controlled through an on-site drainage system. BMPs include both structural and non- structural control methods. Structural controls used to manage storm water pollutant levels include detention basins, oil/grit separators, and porous pavement. Non-structural controls focus on controlling pollutants at the source, generally through implementing erosion and sediment control plans, and various Business Plans that must be developed by any businesses that store and use hazardous materials. Practices such as periodic parking lot sweeping can substantially reduce the amount of pollutants entering the storm drain system. The following mitigation measures are required to control additional storm water effluent: Construction Activities: 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. Rev 9-29-15 P281 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact significant redevelopment. Prior to commencement of construction of a project, a discharger must submit a Notice of Intent (NO1) to obtain coverage under the General Permit. The General Permit requires all dischargers to comply with the following during construction activities, including site clearance and grading: • Develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that would specify Best Management Practices (BMPs) to prevent construction pollutants from contacting storm water and with the intent of keeping all products of erosion from moving off-site into receiving waters. • Eliminate or reduce non -storm water discharges to storm sewer systems and other waters of the nation. • Perform inspections of all BMPs. Waste discharges include discharges of storm water and construction project discharges. A construction project for new development or significant redevelopment requires an NPDES permit. Construction project proponents are required to prepare an SWPPP. To comply with the NPDES, the project's construction contractor will be required to prepare an SWPPP during construction activities, and a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for post -construction operational management of storm water runoff. The applicant has submitted a WQMP (David Evans and Associates, April 2017), which identifies BMPs to minimize the amount of pollutants, such as eroded soils, entering the drainage system after construction. Runoff from driveways, roads and other impermeable surfaces must be controlled through an on-site drainage system. BMPs include both structural and non- structural control methods. Structural controls used to manage storm water pollutant levels include detention basins, oil/grit separators, and porous pavement. Non-structural controls focus on controlling pollutants at the source, generally through implementing erosion and sediment control plans, and various Business Plans that must be developed by any businesses that store and use hazardous materials. Practices such as periodic parking lot sweeping can substantially reduce the amount of pollutants entering the storm drain system. The following mitigation measures are required to control additional storm water effluent: Construction Activities: 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. Rev 9-29-15 P281 P282 Initial Study for DRC2016-00206, SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 36 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 5) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Post -Construction Operational: fi} Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 7) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. b) According to CVWD, approximately 35 percent of the City's water is currently provided from water supplies coming from the underlying Chino and Cucamonga Groundwater Basins. CVWD complies with its prescriptive water rights as managed by the Chino Basin Watermaster and will not deplete the local groundwater resource. The proposed project will not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will it interfere with recharge because it is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Figure RC -3. Development of the site will require the grading and excavation, but would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 300 to 470 feet below the ground surface. As noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.9), continued development citywide will increase water needs but will not be a significant impact. CVWD has plans to meet this increased need to the year 2030. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. c) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on the site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The project design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official Rev 9-29-15 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 5) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Post -Construction Operational: fi} Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 7) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. b) According to CVWD, approximately 35 percent of the City's water is currently provided from water supplies coming from the underlying Chino and Cucamonga Groundwater Basins. CVWD complies with its prescriptive water rights as managed by the Chino Basin Watermaster and will not deplete the local groundwater resource. The proposed project will not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will it interfere with recharge because it is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Figure RC -3. Development of the site will require the grading and excavation, but would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 300 to 470 feet below the ground surface. As noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.9), continued development citywide will increase water needs but will not be a significant impact. CVWD has plans to meet this increased need to the year 2030. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. c) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on the site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The project design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official Rev 9-29-15 Initial Study for DRC2016-00206, SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 37 and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, the project will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated. e) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The project will not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated. f) Grading activities associated with the construction period could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surface flows during a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in surface water quality impacts. The site is for new development/significant redevelopment; therefore, is required to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to minimize water pollution. With implementation of the mitigation measures specified under subsection a), less than significant impacts are anticipated. g) Rev 9-29-15 8) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 9) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. 10) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the WQMP (David Evans and Associates, April 2017) to reduce construction pollutants from entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. The project site is located within a 100 -year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS -5. All new construction of residential units are required to comply with the City's P283 Less Than Significant Less issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant Na Impact Incorporated Impact Impact and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, the project will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated. e) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The project will not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated. f) Grading activities associated with the construction period could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surface flows during a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in surface water quality impacts. The site is for new development/significant redevelopment; therefore, is required to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to minimize water pollution. With implementation of the mitigation measures specified under subsection a), less than significant impacts are anticipated. g) Rev 9-29-15 8) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 9) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. 10) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the WQMP (David Evans and Associates, April 2017) to reduce construction pollutants from entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. The project site is located within a 100 -year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS -5. All new construction of residential units are required to comply with the City's P283 P284 Initial Study for DRC2016-00206, SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 38 Floodplain Management Regulation which require the implementation of various flood hazard reduction measures. Additionally, the project will be required to construct required storm drain facilities or payment of fees for storm drain system improvements. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. h) The project site is located within a 100 -year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS -5. All new construction is required to comply with the City's Floodplain Management Regulation which requires the implementation of various flood hazard reduction measures. Additionally, the project will be required to construct required storm drain facilities or payment of fees for storm drain system improvements. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 1) The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm drain system designed to adequately convey floodwaters from a 100 -year storm event. The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete -lined channels, and underground storm drains as shown in General Plan Figure PS -6. All new construction is required to comply with the City's Floodplain Management Regulation which would ensure that future development would not impede or redirect floodwaters and would be adequately anchored to prevent flotation, collapse, or lateral movement of structures within the floodplain. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. j) There are no oceans, lakes, or reservoirs near the project site; therefore impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated. The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams. Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non -significance within the City. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City. 10. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? () Less Than () (✓) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? () Significant Less (✓) c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? Potentially 'Mth Than (✓) Issues and Supporting Information Sources: significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Floodplain Management Regulation which require the implementation of various flood hazard reduction measures. Additionally, the project will be required to construct required storm drain facilities or payment of fees for storm drain system improvements. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. h) The project site is located within a 100 -year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS -5. All new construction is required to comply with the City's Floodplain Management Regulation which requires the implementation of various flood hazard reduction measures. Additionally, the project will be required to construct required storm drain facilities or payment of fees for storm drain system improvements. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 1) The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm drain system designed to adequately convey floodwaters from a 100 -year storm event. The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete -lined channels, and underground storm drains as shown in General Plan Figure PS -6. All new construction is required to comply with the City's Floodplain Management Regulation which would ensure that future development would not impede or redirect floodwaters and would be adequately anchored to prevent flotation, collapse, or lateral movement of structures within the floodplain. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. j) There are no oceans, lakes, or reservoirs near the project site; therefore impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated. The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams. Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non -significance within the City. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City. 10. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? () () () (✓) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? () () () (✓) c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? () () () (✓) Comments: a) The proposed project is located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between San Bernardino Road and Baker Avenue in a hillside area on the southerly flank of Red Hill and surrounding the historic Sycamore Inn restaurant. The project proposes to amend the General Plan to permit development on slopes 30 percent and greater, the subdivision of a 24.19 acre site into 6 parcels, and the development of 175 condominium units (including 9 live -work units) in the Mixed Use (MU) District. The project site characterized by the existing condominiums, vacant land and golf course land uses to the north, residential and Rev 9-29-15 P285 Initial Study for DRC2016-00206, SUB -FT -16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 39 commercial land uses to the west, the Pacific Electric Trail and Route 66 Trailhead to the east, and residential and commercial land uses to the south. The project is designed consistent with the Mixed Use (MU) District development standards and will include elements that are consistent with surrounding development, thus becoming a part of the larger community. Additionally, the project site plan and architectural massing were designed to be sensitive to the existing neighborhood to the north of the project site through the placement of the buildings that eliminate the possibility of physically impacting an established community. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. b) The project site land use designation is Mixed Use (MU) District. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan and does not interfere with any policies for environmental protection, or SCAG's Regional Comprehensive Plan. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. c) The project site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area. According to General Plan Figure RC -4 and Section 4.10 of the General Plan FPEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources; therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the project is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 11. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: Less Than a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State? () Significant Less (✓) Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially significant With Mitigation Than Significant No c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? Impact Incorporated Impact Impact commercial land uses to the west, the Pacific Electric Trail and Route 66 Trailhead to the east, and residential and commercial land uses to the south. The project is designed consistent with the Mixed Use (MU) District development standards and will include elements that are consistent with surrounding development, thus becoming a part of the larger community. Additionally, the project site plan and architectural massing were designed to be sensitive to the existing neighborhood to the north of the project site through the placement of the buildings that eliminate the possibility of physically impacting an established community. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. b) The project site land use designation is Mixed Use (MU) District. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan and does not interfere with any policies for environmental protection, or SCAG's Regional Comprehensive Plan. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. c) The project site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area. According to General Plan Figure RC -4 and Section 4.10 of the General Plan FPEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources; therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the project is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 11. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State? () () () (✓) b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? () () () (V) Comments: a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure RC -2 and Table RC -1. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. b) The site is not designated by the General Plan, Figure RC -2 and Table RC -1, as a valuable mineral resource recovery site. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 12. NOISE. Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? () () (V) ( ) b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive . ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels? () () () (✓) c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? () () () (✓) Rev 9-29-15 Initial Study for DRC2016-00206, SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 40 d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? () Less Than () ( ) e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? () Significant Less (✓) f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Potentially With Than V) Issues and Supporting Information Sources: SigniFcant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? () (✓) () ( ) e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? () () () (✓) f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? () () () V) Comments: a) The project site is within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to General Plan Figures PS -9 and PS -10. The proposed project is located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between San Bernardino Road and Baker Avenue in a hillside area on the southerly flank of Red Hill and surrounding the historic Sycamore Inn restaurant. The project proposes to amend the General Plan to permit development on slopes 30 percent and greater, the subdivision of a 24.19 acre site into 6 parcels, and the development of 175 condominium units (including 9 live -work units) in the Mixed Use (MU) District. The project site characterized by the existing condominiums, vacant land and golf course land uses to the north, residential and commercial land uses to the west, the Pacific Electric Trail and Route 66 Trailhead to the east, and residential and commercial land uses to the south. Due to the proximity of Foothill Boulevard a Noise Analysis (Mestre Greve Associates, July 2015) was prepared for the project site. For exterior noise mitigation the analysis found that in order to meet the 65 CNEL exterior noise standard, noise barriers will be required along Foothill Boulevard. The noise barriers may consist of a wall, a berm, or a combination of the two. With walls located at the top of slope the first floor exterior living areas are projected to meet the 65 CNEL outdoor noise standard. For interior noise mitigation the analysis found that with the exterior mitigation measures implemented the first floor exterior building surfaces will be exposed to noise levels of less than 65 CNEL, and therefore will require less than 20 dB exterior to interior noise reduction in order to meet the 45 CNEL interior noise standard. Utilizing construction practices common in California, residential buildings achieve outdoor to indoor noise reductions of at least 20 dB. Therefore, all first floor rooms are projected to meet the 45 CNEL interior noise standard without building upgrades. Second floor building surfaces in the project will be exposed to a maximum noise level of 69.3 CNEL, and therefore, will require at least 24.3 dB noise reduction in order to meet the 45 CNEL interior noise standard. Detailed engineering calculations are needed for building attenuation requirements greater than 20 dB. Based upon the construction details and the EWNR values, the exterior to interior noise reduction was calculated for a number of rooms in the project. The results of the EWNR calculations indicate that the worst-case room will achieve an outdoor to indoor noise reduction of about 24.7 dB, which exceeds the required reduction of 24.3 dB. Therefore, all rooms are projected to meet the 45 CN EL interior noise standard without building upgrades. Rev 9-29-15 P286 Initial Study for DRC2016-00206, SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 41 Therefore, based on the information provided in the Noise Analysis, the proposed project would not expose people to or generate noise levels in excess of the standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies. With the following standard mitigation measures and special mitigation measures, the noise impacts on the project will be less than significant. Exterior: 1) Prior to the issuance of any grading plans a construction -related noise mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. The Plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction. 2) During all project site excavation and grading, the project contractors shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers consistent with the manufacturers' standards. 3) The project contractor shall place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors nearest the project site. 4) The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction -related noise sources and noise -sensitive receptors nearest the project site during all project construction. 5) The construction contractor shall obtain the City's approval for its haul plan, with the planned haul truck routes avoiding residential areas to the extent feasible. 6) The construction contractor shall change the timing and/or sequence of the noisiest construction operations to avoid sensitive times of the day. 7) Prior to the issuance of any grading plans, the applicant shall submit a construction -related noise mitigation plan for Planning Director review and approval. This plan shall depict the location of construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction of the project. 8) During construction, the contractor shall ensure all construction equipment is equipped with appropriate noise attenuating devices. 9) Idling equipment shall be turned off when not in use. 10) Equipment shall be maintained so that vehicles and their Toads are secured from rattling and banging. 11) In order to meet the 65 CNEL exterior noise standard, noise barriers ranging from 4 to 5.5 feet (Noise Analysis, Mestre Greve Associates, July 2015, Exhibit 3) will be required along Foothill Boulevard. The noise barriers may consist of a wall, berm, or combination of the two. The noise barriers must have a surface density of at least 3.5 pounds per square foot, and shall have Rev 9-29-15 P287 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No impact Incorporated Impact Impact Therefore, based on the information provided in the Noise Analysis, the proposed project would not expose people to or generate noise levels in excess of the standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies. With the following standard mitigation measures and special mitigation measures, the noise impacts on the project will be less than significant. Exterior: 1) Prior to the issuance of any grading plans a construction -related noise mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. The Plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction. 2) During all project site excavation and grading, the project contractors shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers consistent with the manufacturers' standards. 3) The project contractor shall place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors nearest the project site. 4) The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction -related noise sources and noise -sensitive receptors nearest the project site during all project construction. 5) The construction contractor shall obtain the City's approval for its haul plan, with the planned haul truck routes avoiding residential areas to the extent feasible. 6) The construction contractor shall change the timing and/or sequence of the noisiest construction operations to avoid sensitive times of the day. 7) Prior to the issuance of any grading plans, the applicant shall submit a construction -related noise mitigation plan for Planning Director review and approval. This plan shall depict the location of construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction of the project. 8) During construction, the contractor shall ensure all construction equipment is equipped with appropriate noise attenuating devices. 9) Idling equipment shall be turned off when not in use. 10) Equipment shall be maintained so that vehicles and their Toads are secured from rattling and banging. 11) In order to meet the 65 CNEL exterior noise standard, noise barriers ranging from 4 to 5.5 feet (Noise Analysis, Mestre Greve Associates, July 2015, Exhibit 3) will be required along Foothill Boulevard. The noise barriers may consist of a wall, berm, or combination of the two. The noise barriers must have a surface density of at least 3.5 pounds per square foot, and shall have Rev 9-29-15 P287 P288 Initial Study for DRC2016-00206, SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 42 no openings or gaps. The wall may be constructed of stud and stucco, 3/8 - inch plate glass, or 5/8 -inch Plexiglas, any masonry material, or a combination of these materials. The first floor exterior living areas are projected to meet the 65 CNEL outdoor noise standard with the specified noise barriers. The walls shall be located at the top of slope. Interior: 12) For proper acoustical performance, all exterior windows and doors, and sliding glass doors must have a positive seal and leaks/cracks must be kept to a minimum. 13) To prevent sound leaks the following shall be provided: • On concrete slab, the first layer of 518" gypsum board on the unit side should be sealed top and bottom with resilient caulk, as well as around the junction boxes. • Window rough -in seams should be no greater than 1/4", and all seams should be caulked with resilient caulking. Seal, caulk, gasket or weather-strip all joints and seams to eliminate air leakage through these assemblies. includes around window and doorframes, at penetrations through walls, and all other openings in the building envelope. 14) All first floor rooms are projected to meet the 45 CNEL interior noise standard through the installation of the exterior noise barriers along Foothill Boulevard. All rooms, including second and third floor units, are projected to meet the 45 CNEL interior noise standard without building upgrades. 15) All buildings exposed to noise levels greater than 57 CNEL will meet the 45 CNEL interior noise standard only with windows closed. Adequate ventilation, with windows closed, will be required for those units adjacent to Foothill Boulevard (Noise Analysis, Mestre Greve Associates, July 2015, Exhibit 4). b) The normal operating uses associated with this type of project normally do not induce ground borne vibrations. Construction related vibration may create short term noise and vibration impacts. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. c) The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic. The proposed project site is located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between San Bernardino Road and Baker Avenue in a hillside area on the southerly flank of Red Rill and surrounding the historic Sycamore Inn restaurant. The project proposes the subdivision of a 24.19 acre site into 6 parcels, and the development of 175 condominium units (including 9 live -work units) in the Mixed Use (MU) District. Because the project will not significantly increase traffic as analyzed in Section 16 Transportation/Traffic; it will likely not increase ambient noise levels within the vicinity of the project. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 9-29-15 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact 'Incorporated , Impact Impact no openings or gaps. The wall may be constructed of stud and stucco, 3/8 - inch plate glass, or 5/8 -inch Plexiglas, any masonry material, or a combination of these materials. The first floor exterior living areas are projected to meet the 65 CNEL outdoor noise standard with the specified noise barriers. The walls shall be located at the top of slope. Interior: 12) For proper acoustical performance, all exterior windows and doors, and sliding glass doors must have a positive seal and leaks/cracks must be kept to a minimum. 13) To prevent sound leaks the following shall be provided: • On concrete slab, the first layer of 518" gypsum board on the unit side should be sealed top and bottom with resilient caulk, as well as around the junction boxes. • Window rough -in seams should be no greater than 1/4", and all seams should be caulked with resilient caulking. Seal, caulk, gasket or weather-strip all joints and seams to eliminate air leakage through these assemblies. includes around window and doorframes, at penetrations through walls, and all other openings in the building envelope. 14) All first floor rooms are projected to meet the 45 CNEL interior noise standard through the installation of the exterior noise barriers along Foothill Boulevard. All rooms, including second and third floor units, are projected to meet the 45 CNEL interior noise standard without building upgrades. 15) All buildings exposed to noise levels greater than 57 CNEL will meet the 45 CNEL interior noise standard only with windows closed. Adequate ventilation, with windows closed, will be required for those units adjacent to Foothill Boulevard (Noise Analysis, Mestre Greve Associates, July 2015, Exhibit 4). b) The normal operating uses associated with this type of project normally do not induce ground borne vibrations. Construction related vibration may create short term noise and vibration impacts. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. c) The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic. The proposed project site is located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between San Bernardino Road and Baker Avenue in a hillside area on the southerly flank of Red Rill and surrounding the historic Sycamore Inn restaurant. The project proposes the subdivision of a 24.19 acre site into 6 parcels, and the development of 175 condominium units (including 9 live -work units) in the Mixed Use (MU) District. Because the project will not significantly increase traffic as analyzed in Section 16 Transportation/Traffic; it will likely not increase ambient noise levels within the vicinity of the project. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 9-29-15 P289 Initial Study for DRC2016-00206, SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 43 d) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.12) indicates that during a construction phase, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction equipment, will generate noise exceeding City standards. The following measures are provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts: 16) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 17) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. The preceding mitigation measures will reduce the disturbance created by on-site construction equipment but do not address the potential impacts because of the transport of construction materials and debris. The following mitigation measures shall then be required: 18) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes and include appropriate noise mitigation measures. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport. The Project is located approximately 3 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 13. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: Less Than a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? () Significant Less (✓) b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Potentially With Than (✓) Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact d) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.12) indicates that during a construction phase, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction equipment, will generate noise exceeding City standards. The following measures are provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts: 16) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 17) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. The preceding mitigation measures will reduce the disturbance created by on-site construction equipment but do not address the potential impacts because of the transport of construction materials and debris. The following mitigation measures shall then be required: 18) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes and include appropriate noise mitigation measures. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport. The Project is located approximately 3 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 13. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? () () () (✓) b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? () () () (✓) Rev 9-29-15 Initial Study for DRC2016-00206, SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 P290 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 44 c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? () () () (✓) Comments: a) The project is located in a predominantly developed area and will include the development of a 175 condominium units (including 9 five -work units) on 24.19 acres of land. Although the project will increase the population growth in the area there will be a less than significant impact as the project is consistent with the underlying Zoning and General Plan Designation which density was analyzed as part of the build out in the General Plan FPEIR. Since the project is an infill project and surrounded by developed infrastructure, adequate schools and the utility capacities to serve the project, this minimal increase in population is considered less than significant. Construction activities at the site will be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. b) The majority of the project site is vacant and the only existing use is a restaurant building, which was previously the Red Chief Motel front office, located on the western portion of the site, and there will be no displacement of housing or people. Therefore, no adverse impact is expected. c) The majority of the project site is vacant and the only existing use is a restaurant building, which was previously the Red Chief Motel front office, located on the western portion of the site, and there will be no displacement of housing or people. Therefore, no adverse impact is expected. 14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: a) Fire protection? () Less Than () (✓) b) Police protection? O Significant Less V) Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially significant With Mitigation Than Significant No d) Parks? Impact Incorporated impact Imact c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? () () () (✓) Comments: a) The project is located in a predominantly developed area and will include the development of a 175 condominium units (including 9 five -work units) on 24.19 acres of land. Although the project will increase the population growth in the area there will be a less than significant impact as the project is consistent with the underlying Zoning and General Plan Designation which density was analyzed as part of the build out in the General Plan FPEIR. Since the project is an infill project and surrounded by developed infrastructure, adequate schools and the utility capacities to serve the project, this minimal increase in population is considered less than significant. Construction activities at the site will be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. b) The majority of the project site is vacant and the only existing use is a restaurant building, which was previously the Red Chief Motel front office, located on the western portion of the site, and there will be no displacement of housing or people. Therefore, no adverse impact is expected. c) The majority of the project site is vacant and the only existing use is a restaurant building, which was previously the Red Chief Motel front office, located on the western portion of the site, and there will be no displacement of housing or people. Therefore, no adverse impact is expected. 14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: a) Fire protection? () () () (✓) b) Police protection? O O O V) c) Schools? O O O (✓) d) Parks? () () () V) e) Other public facilities? O O O (✓) Comments: a) The project site, located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Hermosa Avenue, would be served by Fire Station #172 at 9612 San Bernardino Road, located approximately 1.6 miles from the project site. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the project to lessen the future demand and impacts to fire services. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 9-29-15 P291 Initial Study for DRC2016-00206, SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 45 b) Additional police protection is not required as the addition of the project will not change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled as the project site is within an area that is regularly patrolled. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. c) The site is in a developed area currently served by the Central School District and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District. The project will be required to pay School Fees as prescribed by State law prior to the issuance of building permits. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park, Red Hill Community Park located at 7484 Vineyard Avenue, is located approximately 1.4 miles northeast of the project site. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct ,new facilities. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. e) The proposed project will utilize existing public facilities. The site is in a developing area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services. According to the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.14), there will be a projected increase in library space demand but with the implementation of standard conditions the increase in Library Services would be mitigated to less than significant impact. Additionally, the Paul A. Biane Library has an additional 14,000 square foot shell of vacant library space that is planned for future Library use. The .proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 15. RECREATION. Would the project: Less Than a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? () Significant Less (✓) Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation. Than Signlfcant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact b) Additional police protection is not required as the addition of the project will not change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled as the project site is within an area that is regularly patrolled. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. c) The site is in a developed area currently served by the Central School District and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District. The project will be required to pay School Fees as prescribed by State law prior to the issuance of building permits. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park, Red Hill Community Park located at 7484 Vineyard Avenue, is located approximately 1.4 miles northeast of the project site. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct ,new facilities. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. e) The proposed project will utilize existing public facilities. The site is in a developing area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services. According to the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.14), there will be a projected increase in library space demand but with the implementation of standard conditions the increase in Library Services would be mitigated to less than significant impact. Additionally, the Paul A. Biane Library has an additional 14,000 square foot shell of vacant library space that is planned for future Library use. The .proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 15. RECREATION. Would the project: a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? () () () (✓) b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? () () () (✓) Comments: a) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park, Red Hill Community Park located at 7484 Vineyard Avenue, is located approximately 1.4 miles northeast of the project site. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. b) The project does not include the development of new or the expansion of existing recreational facilities. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 9-29-15 P292 Initial Study for DRC2016-00206, SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 46 16. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project: a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non -motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not Limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? () Less Than () (V) b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to a level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? () Significant Less (✓) Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially significant With Mitigation Than significant No d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 16. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project: a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non -motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not Limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? () () () (V) b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to a level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? () () () (✓) c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that result in substantial safety risks? () () () (✓) d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? () () () (V) e) Result in inadequate emergency access? () () () (✓) f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities'? () () () (✓) Comments: a) The proposed project is located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between San Bernardino Road and Baker Avenue in a hillside area on the southerly flank of Red Hi[1 and surrounding the historic Sycamore Inn restaurant. The project proposes to amend the General Plan to permit development on slopes 30 percent and greater, the subdivision of a 24.19 acre site into 6 parcels, and the development of 175 condominium units (including 9 live -work units) in the Mixed Use (MU) District. The project site characterized by the existing condominiums, vacant land and golf course land uses to the north, residential and commercial land uses to the west, the Pacific Electric Trail and Route 66 Trailhead to the east, and residential and commercial [and uses to the south. The proposed project is forecast to generate 1,042 daily trips, with 80 trips in the a.m. peak hour, and 94 trips in the p.m. peak hour (Linscott, Law & Greenspan Engineers, September 2015), as shown in the following table: Rev 9-29-15 Initial Study for DRC2016-00206, SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 47 PROJECT TRIP GENERATION RATES AND FORECAST ITE Land Use C'ocletProject Description Daily 2 -Way Less Than PM Peak Hour Enter Exit Total Significant Less Trio Generation Factors: 5.81 11.03 Potentially With Than 67'10 17°; Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No 13 3 Impact Incorporated Impact Impact PROJECT TRIP GENERATION RATES AND FORECAST ITE Land Use C'ocletProject Description Daily 2 -Way .4M Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Trio Generation Factors: 5.81 11.03 17°0 SS% S3°0 12°0 i 0.-14 1.56 67'10 17°; 33% S3% 0.52 1.49 • 230: Residential Condominium/Townhouse (TE01.7) • 710: General Office Building (TEi1000 SF) Proposed Project Trip Gane arson Forecast: 1.017 25 13 3 64 0 77 3 61 1 30 2 91 3 • Sycamore Heights C'ondonliui11ms — (175 DU) - Sycamore Heights Lice,'Work — (2.241 SF) Proposed Project Trip Generation Forecast 1.042 16 64 80 62 32 94 \QFeS: • TEDD— Tip ends per Dwelling unit • TE '1000 SF — Trip ends per 1000 SF development Under existing conditions, all intersections operate at satisfactory LOS C or better during the AM and PM peak hours, with the exception of the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Red Hill Country Club Drive, which is unsignalized and currently operates at LOS F during both the AM and PM peak hours. Per the Traffic Impact Study (Linscott, Law & Greenspan Engineers, September 2015), it is not uncommon that unsignalized public street intersections and/or driveways that have direct access to regional/major arterials, such as Foothill Boulevard, operate at an unacceptable LOS due to the limited gaps in traffic and the high volume of traffic that utilizes these streets as commuter routes. Under the opening year scenario, all intersections operate satisfactorily at LOS C or better with project mitigation. The City Engineer reviewed the Traffic Impact Study submitted for the project and concurs with the report's findings. Existing Levels of Service EXISTING WITH PROJECT CCRIQRIOtIS PEAT( HOUR IlTERSECTIOON CAPACITY ANALYSIS SUMiIARY moles • LA= seroadspet vehicle ((Idly) • LOS' Lend of Sersicr-plrasesrkrio Tal7,)-1 aa.l +-1 For le LOSdeiullLkCa4 • 9,11O•hv LOS values indicate adverse ser.:celeteh hated en she LOS svadacds meaUxed za dascep°n Rev 9-29-15 P293 (11 Exisling Traffic Conditions (2) E :isihr: V. ith Project Tialiic C-ondlt(ohs (3) Significant Impact (4) Exhtln_ With PILO) tit With ]Iiligailon Time Delay Delia Dela Key Intersection Period (s.v) LOS. (s v) LOS ' 1•es'No (s'r) LOS Grove Avenue 11 AM 17 : 3 17 4 B No la 1 3 I Foothill Buuletud Ph1 1.:L.4 C 2:5 C' No 24 2 C. Red Hill Country Club Dnee at AM 10-1_2 F 1"2.4 F Yes 17.7 Ci I. Foothill Bosdesani PM 3_13 F 3722.1 F Yes 111 3 C'aralraa Street ar i AM 10:3 B 11 1 B No -- Red Hill Country Club Ative PM 7.1 A a.1 A No -- - San Beniardino Rood at AM 22 - C" 22 6 C No 22.9 C J. Foothill Boulevard PM 222.1 C s, 3 C NO 222 5 C moles • LA= seroadspet vehicle ((Idly) • LOS' Lend of Sersicr-plrasesrkrio Tal7,)-1 aa.l +-1 For le LOSdeiullLkCa4 • 9,11O•hv LOS values indicate adverse ser.:celeteh hated en she LOS svadacds meaUxed za dascep°n Rev 9-29-15 P293 Initial Study for DRC2016-00206, SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 48 Opening Year Levels of Service YEAR 2018 CCrio1r s 9 PEAR N5UR INlERSECTIctI CATACITY ANALYSE 517u!aARY Time Petioli Less Than (A fear 7919 Without ProJet5 r ram( Coalitions rR Year 21718 !47th Pro)eet frame (:oodarow 441 Slxumeaar Impart (sl Yea, 7018 11714 Project 31th 1111lga,wu Significant Less Dela, Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Opening Year Levels of Service YEAR 2018 CCrio1r s 9 PEAR N5UR INlERSECTIctI CATACITY ANALYSE 517u!aARY • •. •.wu.l. pn .. i J.ta.l • LOS •7:14(5)x: 2e m. e•es.'o T-!:arr! AnJ.S.-f •L1,942,4:12 • •a4114t. er..arae. ul.J7 .1..n -e <+a•L.r1. tu,e.I 9, ,0•-•.,,r Year 2035 Levels of Service GENERAL PLAN HUI4ZOUT CO(ICIflOHS PEA IS HCUR INTERSECT CIN CAPACITY AIULYSIS SUISAARY Ke) 1nielsecIluq Time Petioli Irl , Cvaln; 1rarAe['audition, (A fear 7919 Without ProJet5 r ram( Coalitions rR Year 21718 !47th Pro)eet frame (:oodarow 441 Slxumeaar Impart (sl Yea, 7018 11714 Project 31th 1111lga,wu ,1.13 P.1 7424 Yet .Lir all .1741 int A35 F31 !tine Dela, 21 3I 5 Se •.l .... 1 1: 5 c 1 No 1 115 a I Na 1 1 No 111 1 I No 2' 1 ( \o 1 11 ' 4 r No 5n A Nn 149 P No I 155 D I ll'd 4 ter. j ISR D neler Dela, vela} Ker. Inlet4141ton Pei Ind 11.1) LOS 1 1. 4) LOS f, 11 Los Ce•\n C3 t} Las I Gra.. Areum. .t .113 1.1 I79 No In n r4.4.41134.4414-..3 fir 211 1. 230 (• :31 C \,, .`0 L 94 Hal C'in <1441' 41•.x4,1 am :Ca_2 F' 10'1 a ,3141 4 Cel In. CJ rou4,li an4,'.u7 EM 3141 4 6119 5 La,40.1 F Sea ii 1, 4 ('ataehaa "inert u x41 14 1 4 In : A 11 1 a No - Iu.d HIE Colons Club Dr. P1.1 t 9 .1 1 1 A 1 1 .4 :to 1 2.91 H.mdt&L14 Rn4.l et AM 21 2 L 1 ` I C 41 I C No 11 'r ( EwT.O E.c....los eel TI 111C , _ .• c s1 C 1.10 411 ( • •. •.wu.l. pn .. i J.ta.l • LOS •7:14(5)x: 2e m. e•es.'o T-!:arr! AnJ.S.-f •L1,942,4:12 • •a4114t. er..arae. ul.J7 .1..n -e <+a•L.r1. tu,e.I 9, ,0•-•.,,r Year 2035 Levels of Service GENERAL PLAN HUI4ZOUT CO(ICIflOHS PEA IS HCUR INTERSECT CIN CAPACITY AIULYSIS SUISAARY Ke) 1nielsecIluq Time Petioli I 4in E,1,7Fnx TI a1r& 4_0.00144. Derry 1.41 LOS (2r (;ene9•41 Plan H13HIaul 11(11,out Protect Train( C'andlriom Dela} T _+ _ (.3) LOS 1.4 a;mrl 91 Plan ESulydnra 11315 Pr ojerr nettle (nndlllop, Drlas. • .. 13 41 LOS (41 I CSI !General Plan E3ulldout 'Ixuln1Jnl With Pr9)eel 1.4544(1 _I _ 111111 1111191(lon _,_ . —' Delay ~ Yes No I 54 31 LOi Orme Ar•vue 1 1 Fonhdl Bra, ,rJ Re/ IECcaah: Clot, Dr.i. d _A 4...411•2110.4.1......4 A Red 51.11 tr".xn i'Iv1144.l'I.tl FawhrU Boot, n1 3 CutleLan Sta., 31 Red Hill Cowan Cha. DIS• 74al a 9.02. duln 174.4.4 17 5 la.111a1 B.we.ul ,1.13 P.1 7424 Yet .Lir all .1741 int A35 F31 1- 3 B. :: s 1 144 P 1 7:� } F' 1• r 10 r 7 1 79 .A 2 2 C I .•1 C 21 1. C a- c S_, 8`1 11 ' (' :a•7 Cll :6 ( 1 115 13 26 ,C tog O 11'4 F 21 3I 5 Se •.l .... 1 1: 5 c 1 No 1 115 a I Na 1 1 No 111 1 I No 2' 1 ( \o 1 11 ' 4 r No 5n A Nn 149 P No I 155 D I ll'd 4 ter. j ISR D •-,rsul. pn.r3rle 1e:.,, • Lea. Lr:.l et Seater cS . nit: s -r. tea. 01, tun • Saki I1.Ia,104,11..) uk:1411 .4.,.,,n. 4,.42. cd --9 &A. Lal rak,Jarr amf At. I.i-et Different from the two preceding tables, the 2035 Buildout analysis assumes the realignment of Red Hill Country Club Drive on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, west of the proposed project. Additionally, the 2035 Buildout analysis for the intersection of San . Bernardino Road and Foothill Boulevard is forecast to operate at an adverse LOS during the PM peak hour (LOS F). However, the implementation of recommended improvements will offset the Project impact and return the operating condition of the intersection to an acceptable LOS during the AM and PM peak hours at year 2035. The project is in an area that is mostly developed with street improvements existing or included in project design. The project will not create a substantial increase in the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume, or congestion at intersections. The project site will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per City roadway standards. In addition, the City has established a Transportation Development fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of Rev 9-29-15 P294 P295 Initial Study for DRC2016-00206, SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 49 building permits. Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. b) In November 2004, San Bernardino County voters passed the Measure 1 extension which requires local jurisdictions to impose appropriate fees on development for their fair share toward regional transportation improvement projects. On May 18, 2005, the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted a Comprehensive Transportation Fee Schedule updating these development impact fees. As a result, the San Bernardino County Congestion Management Agency waived the Congestion Management Plan (CMP) Traffic Impact Analysis reporting requirement. This project will be required, as a condition of approval, to pay the adopted transportation development fee prior to issuance of building permit. The project is in an area that is mostly developed with all street improvements existing. The project will not negatively impact the level of service standards on adjacent arterials. The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. c) Located approximately 3 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The project is in an area that is mostly developed with commercial and residential developments. The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. The project design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming uses. The project will, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards because of a design feature. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. e) The project will be designed to provide access for all emergency vehicles during construction and upon completion of the project and will therefore not create an inadequate emergency access. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. f) The proposed project is located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between San Bernardino Road and Baker Avenue in a hillside area on the southerly flank of Red Hill and surrounding the historic Sycamore Inn restaurant. The project proposes the subdivision of a 24.19 acre site into 6 parcels, and the development of 175 condominium units (including 9 live -work units) in the Mixed Use (MU) District. The project design provides typical features to support transportation and vehicle trip reduction (e.g., bus bays, bicycle racks, carpool parking, etc.), including local infrastructure (e.g., streets, sidewalks, and traffic/pedestrian signals), level topography, supporting transportation, and vehicle trip reduction. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 9-29-15 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No impact Incorporated Impact Impact building permits. Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. b) In November 2004, San Bernardino County voters passed the Measure 1 extension which requires local jurisdictions to impose appropriate fees on development for their fair share toward regional transportation improvement projects. On May 18, 2005, the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted a Comprehensive Transportation Fee Schedule updating these development impact fees. As a result, the San Bernardino County Congestion Management Agency waived the Congestion Management Plan (CMP) Traffic Impact Analysis reporting requirement. This project will be required, as a condition of approval, to pay the adopted transportation development fee prior to issuance of building permit. The project is in an area that is mostly developed with all street improvements existing. The project will not negatively impact the level of service standards on adjacent arterials. The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. c) Located approximately 3 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The project is in an area that is mostly developed with commercial and residential developments. The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. The project design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming uses. The project will, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards because of a design feature. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. e) The project will be designed to provide access for all emergency vehicles during construction and upon completion of the project and will therefore not create an inadequate emergency access. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. f) The proposed project is located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between San Bernardino Road and Baker Avenue in a hillside area on the southerly flank of Red Hill and surrounding the historic Sycamore Inn restaurant. The project proposes the subdivision of a 24.19 acre site into 6 parcels, and the development of 175 condominium units (including 9 live -work units) in the Mixed Use (MU) District. The project design provides typical features to support transportation and vehicle trip reduction (e.g., bus bays, bicycle racks, carpool parking, etc.), including local infrastructure (e.g., streets, sidewalks, and traffic/pedestrian signals), level topography, supporting transportation, and vehicle trip reduction. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 9-29-15 initial Study for DRC2016-00206, SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 50 17. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code Section Less Than 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with the cultural value to a Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially significant With Mitigation Than Significant No a) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Impact _ Incorporated Impact Impact 17. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code Section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with the cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is: a) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of () () () (/) Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code Section 5020.1(K), or b) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public () (`1) () ( ) Resources Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe. Comments: a) As defined in Public Resources Code 21074 and applying the criteria located in Public Resources Code Section 5024.1(c), the project site has not been identified as a "Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2.24 (Historic Preservation). Additionally, A Cultural Resources Assessment was performed on the project site (Applied EarthWorks, 2017). In conjunction with the South Central Coastal Information Center at California State University, Fullerton, the California Historical Resources Information was also consulted. A total of 60 cultural resource investigations have been conducted within a 1 mile search of the project site between 1973 and 2015. Five of these studies encompass portions of the project area. As a result of these studies, the entire project site has been previously surveyed. A total of 55 cultural resources have been documented within a one -mile radius of the project site. Four cultural resources have been previously documented identified within the project site; these resources include three archaeological sites and a built -environment resource. A cultural resource survey of the project area was conducted by Applied EarthWorks on April 25, 2017. Survey transects were oriented in an east -west direction and were spaced 10-15 meters apart. The project area contained a range of topography from flat to hilly terrain with slopes that exceeded 25 degrees. Sandy, alluvial deposits containing metamorphic cobbles were found on the flatter portions of the project area, while slopes and hilltops were characterized by reddish -brown clay loam. Vegetation included sycamores, coast live oak, chamise, and weedy species, including invasive wild mustard. The western, northern, and northeastern portions of the project area contained patches of grasses and weeds that were characterized by poor ground visibility (10-40%). Ground visibility was generally good (50-80%) in the other portions of the Project area No potentially significant prehistoric or historical cultural resources were identified during the cultural resource survey of the project area; however, two cultural resources were identified within the project area as a result of the survey efforts. These resources include the historical reservoir and irrigation system (P-36-013927) and historical building (P -36 - Rev 9-29-15 P296 Initial Study for DRC2016-00206, SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 51 013931); neither resources was eligible for listing on the California Register of Historical Resources or the Rancho Cucamonga Register of Historical Landmarks. A revisit to the locations of the previously recorded prehistoric sites P-36-000897 and P-36-000898 found no evidence of artifacts or indications of subsurface deposits. Furthermore, no newly identified cultural resources were documented during the Phase I survey. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. b) In conformance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5, a Cultural Resource Assessment was performed on the project site by Applied EarthWorks (May 2017). In conjunction with the South Central Coastal Information Center at California State University, Fullerton, the California Historical Resources Information was also consulted. A total of 60 cultural resource investigations have been conducted within a 1 mile search of the project site between 1973 and 2015. Five of these studies encompass portions of the project area. As a result of these studies, the entire project site has been previously surveyed. A total of 55 cultural resources have been documented within a one -mile radius of the project site. Four cultural resources have been previously documented identified within the project site; these resources include three archaeological sites and a built -environment resource. No potentially significant cultural resources were identified during the cultural resource survey of the project area; however, two cultural resources were identified within the project area as a result of the survey efforts. These resources include the historical reservoir and irrigation system (P-36-013927) and historical building (P-36-013931); neither resources was eligible for listing on the California Register of Historical Resources or the Rancho Cucamonga Register of Historical Landmarks. A revisit to the locations of the previously recorded prehistoric sites P-36-000897 and P-36-000898 found no evidence of artifacts or indications of subsurface deposits. Furthermore, no newly identified cultural resources were documented during the Phase I survey. In the event that potentially significant archaeological materials are encountered during project related construction activities, all work must be halted in the vicinity of the archaeological discovery until a qualified archaeologist can visit the site of discovery and assess the significance of the archaeological resource. As well, Health and Safety Code 7050.5, CEQA 15064.5(e), and Public Resources Code 5097.98 mandate the process to be followed in the unlikely event of an accidental discovery of any human remains in a location other than a dedicated cemetery. As required by Senate Bill 18 (SB 18), the City submitted Tribal Consultation Requests for General Plan Amendment DRC2016-00206 to the Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians, the San Manual Band of Mission Indians, the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation, the Morongo Band of Mission Indians, the Serrano Nation of Mission Indians, the Gabrielenofrongva Nation, the Gabrielenorrongva San Gabriel Band of Mission Indians, and the San Fernando Band of Mission Indians. The notices were mailed on July 6, 2016 and provided for a 90 -day comment period ending on October 4, 2016. Of the 8 tribes who were notified, none submitted a response requesting consultation during the notification period. As required by Assembly Bill 52 (AB 52), the City submitted Tribal Consultation Requests to the Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians, the San Manual Band of Mission Indians, the San Gabriel Band of Mission Indians, and the Torres Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians following a completeness determination for Design Review DRC2012-00672. The notices were mailed on February 16, 2017 and provided for a 30 -day comment period ending on March 20, 2017. No responses were received during this notification period; however, the Rev 9-29-15 P297 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 013931); neither resources was eligible for listing on the California Register of Historical Resources or the Rancho Cucamonga Register of Historical Landmarks. A revisit to the locations of the previously recorded prehistoric sites P-36-000897 and P-36-000898 found no evidence of artifacts or indications of subsurface deposits. Furthermore, no newly identified cultural resources were documented during the Phase I survey. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. b) In conformance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5, a Cultural Resource Assessment was performed on the project site by Applied EarthWorks (May 2017). In conjunction with the South Central Coastal Information Center at California State University, Fullerton, the California Historical Resources Information was also consulted. A total of 60 cultural resource investigations have been conducted within a 1 mile search of the project site between 1973 and 2015. Five of these studies encompass portions of the project area. As a result of these studies, the entire project site has been previously surveyed. A total of 55 cultural resources have been documented within a one -mile radius of the project site. Four cultural resources have been previously documented identified within the project site; these resources include three archaeological sites and a built -environment resource. No potentially significant cultural resources were identified during the cultural resource survey of the project area; however, two cultural resources were identified within the project area as a result of the survey efforts. These resources include the historical reservoir and irrigation system (P-36-013927) and historical building (P-36-013931); neither resources was eligible for listing on the California Register of Historical Resources or the Rancho Cucamonga Register of Historical Landmarks. A revisit to the locations of the previously recorded prehistoric sites P-36-000897 and P-36-000898 found no evidence of artifacts or indications of subsurface deposits. Furthermore, no newly identified cultural resources were documented during the Phase I survey. In the event that potentially significant archaeological materials are encountered during project related construction activities, all work must be halted in the vicinity of the archaeological discovery until a qualified archaeologist can visit the site of discovery and assess the significance of the archaeological resource. As well, Health and Safety Code 7050.5, CEQA 15064.5(e), and Public Resources Code 5097.98 mandate the process to be followed in the unlikely event of an accidental discovery of any human remains in a location other than a dedicated cemetery. As required by Senate Bill 18 (SB 18), the City submitted Tribal Consultation Requests for General Plan Amendment DRC2016-00206 to the Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians, the San Manual Band of Mission Indians, the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation, the Morongo Band of Mission Indians, the Serrano Nation of Mission Indians, the Gabrielenofrongva Nation, the Gabrielenorrongva San Gabriel Band of Mission Indians, and the San Fernando Band of Mission Indians. The notices were mailed on July 6, 2016 and provided for a 90 -day comment period ending on October 4, 2016. Of the 8 tribes who were notified, none submitted a response requesting consultation during the notification period. As required by Assembly Bill 52 (AB 52), the City submitted Tribal Consultation Requests to the Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians, the San Manual Band of Mission Indians, the San Gabriel Band of Mission Indians, and the Torres Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians following a completeness determination for Design Review DRC2012-00672. The notices were mailed on February 16, 2017 and provided for a 30 -day comment period ending on March 20, 2017. No responses were received during this notification period; however, the Rev 9-29-15 P297 Initial Study for DRC2016-00206, SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 52 San Manual Band of Mission Indians did respond on April 7, 2017 requesting consultation. Although the consultation request by the San Manual Band of Mission Indians was received after the end of the consultation period the City did honor their request and include their comments in the mitigation measures below. An additional notice was provided to the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation on May 17, 2017 following their AB 52 noticing request. On May 25, 2017 the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation responded with a request for consultation and their comments are included in the mitigation measures below. Should any undocumented archaeological or cultural resources be discovered during ground disturbing activities, adherence to the mitigation measures listed below will ensure that all impacts will be less than significant. 1) The applicant shall contact the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians -- Kizh Nation (GBMI-KN) and the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians (SMBMI) to discuss Tribal Monitoring of the project during all ground disturbing activities, and any trenching below the initial grade level, to ensure that cultural resources that may be encountered during ground disturbances are protected and preserved for study. The monitor(s) must be approved by the Tribal Representatives and will be present on-site during ground disturbing activities. The Native American Monitor(s) will complete monitoring logs on a daily basis. The logs will provide descriptions of the daily activities, including construction activities, locations, soil, and any cultural materials identified. in addition, the monitors) will be required to provide insurance certificates, including liability insurance, for any archaeological resource(s) encountered during grading and excavation activities pertinent to the provisions outlined in the California Environmental Quality Act, California Public Resources Code Division 13, and Section 21083.2 (a) through (k). The on-site monitoring shall end when the project site grading and excavation activities are completed, or when the Tribal Representatives and monitor have indicated that the site has a low potential for archeological resources. The applicant shall submit the results of these consultations to the City prior to issuance of grading permits for the project site. 2) In the event that human remains or funerary objects are encountered during any activities associated with the project, work in the immediate vicinity (within a 100 -foot buffer of the find) shall cease and the County Coroner shall be contacted pursuant to State Health and Safety Code §7050.5, and that code shall be enforced for the duration of the project. Prior to the start of ground disturbing activities, the land owner shall arrange a designated site location within the footprint of the project for the respectful reburial of the human remains and/or ceremonial objects. Any discoveries of human skeletal material shall be immediately reported to the County Coroner. The monitor will then notify the Qualified Archaeologist and the construction manager who will call the coroner. Work will continue to be diverted while the coroner determines whether the remains are Native American. The discovery is to be kept confidential and secure to prevent any further disturbance. If Native American, the coroner will notify the NAHC as mandated by state law who will then appoint a Most Likely Descendent. In the case where discovered human remains cannot be fully documented and recovered on the same day, the remains will be covered with muslin cloth and a steel plate that can be moved by heavy equipment placed over the excavation opening to protect the remains. If this type of steel plate is Rev 9-29-15 P298 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact San Manual Band of Mission Indians did respond on April 7, 2017 requesting consultation. Although the consultation request by the San Manual Band of Mission Indians was received after the end of the consultation period the City did honor their request and include their comments in the mitigation measures below. An additional notice was provided to the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation on May 17, 2017 following their AB 52 noticing request. On May 25, 2017 the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation responded with a request for consultation and their comments are included in the mitigation measures below. Should any undocumented archaeological or cultural resources be discovered during ground disturbing activities, adherence to the mitigation measures listed below will ensure that all impacts will be less than significant. 1) The applicant shall contact the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians -- Kizh Nation (GBMI-KN) and the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians (SMBMI) to discuss Tribal Monitoring of the project during all ground disturbing activities, and any trenching below the initial grade level, to ensure that cultural resources that may be encountered during ground disturbances are protected and preserved for study. The monitor(s) must be approved by the Tribal Representatives and will be present on-site during ground disturbing activities. The Native American Monitor(s) will complete monitoring logs on a daily basis. The logs will provide descriptions of the daily activities, including construction activities, locations, soil, and any cultural materials identified. in addition, the monitors) will be required to provide insurance certificates, including liability insurance, for any archaeological resource(s) encountered during grading and excavation activities pertinent to the provisions outlined in the California Environmental Quality Act, California Public Resources Code Division 13, and Section 21083.2 (a) through (k). The on-site monitoring shall end when the project site grading and excavation activities are completed, or when the Tribal Representatives and monitor have indicated that the site has a low potential for archeological resources. The applicant shall submit the results of these consultations to the City prior to issuance of grading permits for the project site. 2) In the event that human remains or funerary objects are encountered during any activities associated with the project, work in the immediate vicinity (within a 100 -foot buffer of the find) shall cease and the County Coroner shall be contacted pursuant to State Health and Safety Code §7050.5, and that code shall be enforced for the duration of the project. Prior to the start of ground disturbing activities, the land owner shall arrange a designated site location within the footprint of the project for the respectful reburial of the human remains and/or ceremonial objects. Any discoveries of human skeletal material shall be immediately reported to the County Coroner. The monitor will then notify the Qualified Archaeologist and the construction manager who will call the coroner. Work will continue to be diverted while the coroner determines whether the remains are Native American. The discovery is to be kept confidential and secure to prevent any further disturbance. If Native American, the coroner will notify the NAHC as mandated by state law who will then appoint a Most Likely Descendent. In the case where discovered human remains cannot be fully documented and recovered on the same day, the remains will be covered with muslin cloth and a steel plate that can be moved by heavy equipment placed over the excavation opening to protect the remains. If this type of steel plate is Rev 9-29-15 P298 Initial Study for DRC20.16-00206, SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 53 notavailable, a 24 hour guard should be posted outside of working hours. The Tribe(s) will make every effort to recommend diverting the project and keeping the remains in situ and protected. If the project cannot be diverted, it may be determined that burials will be removed. The Tribe(s) will work closely with the Qualified Archaeologist to ensure that the excavation is treated carefully, ethically,and respectfully. If data recovery is approved by the Tribe(s), documentation shall be taken which includes at a minimum detailed descriptive notes and sketches. Additional types of documentation shall be approved by the Tribe(s) for data recovery purposes, Cremations will either be removed in bulk or by means as necessary to ensure completely recovery of all material. If the discovery of human remains includes 4 or more burials, the location is considered a cemetery and a separate treatment plan shall be created. The project applicant shall consult with the Tribe(s) regarding avoidance of all cemetery sites. Once,complete, a final report of all activities are to be submitted to the NAHC. The Tribe(s) do NOT authorize any scientific study or the utilization of any invasive diagnostics on human remains. 3) In the event that Native American cultural resources are discoveredduring project activities, all work in the immediate vicinity of the find (within a 60- footbuffer) shall cease and a qualified archaeologist meeting Secretary of Interior standards shall be hired to assess the find. Work on the other portions of the project outside of the buffered area may continue during this assessment period. The archaeologist shall contact the GBM1-KN and the SMBMI for input regarding the preservation, retention and final disposition of any discovered cultural resources. The archaeologist shall prepare a mitigation plan and technical resources management report, which shall document the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Additionally, the GBMI-KN and the SMBMI will be contacted if any such find occurs and be provided information and permitted/invited to perform a site visit when the archaeologist makes hislherassessment, so as to provide Tribal input. All archaeological resources unearthed by project construction activities shall be evaluated by the Qualified Archaeologist and Native Monitor. If the resources are Native American in origin, the Tribe(s) shall coordinate with the landowner regarding treatment and curation of these resources. Typically, the Tribe(s) will request reburial or preservation for educational purposes. If a resource is determined by the Qualified Archaeologist to constitute a "historical resource" pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(a) or has a "unique archaeological resource" pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21083.2(g), the Qualified Archaeologist shall coordinate with the applicant and the City to.develop a formal treatmentplan that would serve to reduce impacts to the resources. The treatment plan established for the resources shall be in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(f) for historical resources and Public Resources Code Sections 21083.2(b) for unique archaeological resources. Preservation in place (i.e., avoidance) is the preferred manner of treatment. If preservation in place is not feasible, treatment may include implementation of archaeological data recovery excavations to remove the resource along with subsequent laboratory •processing and analysis. Any historic archaeological material that is not Native American in origin shall be curated Rev 9-29-15 P299 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No .Impact Incorporated Impact ' Impact notavailable, a 24 hour guard should be posted outside of working hours. The Tribe(s) will make every effort to recommend diverting the project and keeping the remains in situ and protected. If the project cannot be diverted, it may be determined that burials will be removed. The Tribe(s) will work closely with the Qualified Archaeologist to ensure that the excavation is treated carefully, ethically,and respectfully. If data recovery is approved by the Tribe(s), documentation shall be taken which includes at a minimum detailed descriptive notes and sketches. Additional types of documentation shall be approved by the Tribe(s) for data recovery purposes, Cremations will either be removed in bulk or by means as necessary to ensure completely recovery of all material. If the discovery of human remains includes 4 or more burials, the location is considered a cemetery and a separate treatment plan shall be created. The project applicant shall consult with the Tribe(s) regarding avoidance of all cemetery sites. Once,complete, a final report of all activities are to be submitted to the NAHC. The Tribe(s) do NOT authorize any scientific study or the utilization of any invasive diagnostics on human remains. 3) In the event that Native American cultural resources are discoveredduring project activities, all work in the immediate vicinity of the find (within a 60- footbuffer) shall cease and a qualified archaeologist meeting Secretary of Interior standards shall be hired to assess the find. Work on the other portions of the project outside of the buffered area may continue during this assessment period. The archaeologist shall contact the GBM1-KN and the SMBMI for input regarding the preservation, retention and final disposition of any discovered cultural resources. The archaeologist shall prepare a mitigation plan and technical resources management report, which shall document the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Additionally, the GBMI-KN and the SMBMI will be contacted if any such find occurs and be provided information and permitted/invited to perform a site visit when the archaeologist makes hislherassessment, so as to provide Tribal input. All archaeological resources unearthed by project construction activities shall be evaluated by the Qualified Archaeologist and Native Monitor. If the resources are Native American in origin, the Tribe(s) shall coordinate with the landowner regarding treatment and curation of these resources. Typically, the Tribe(s) will request reburial or preservation for educational purposes. If a resource is determined by the Qualified Archaeologist to constitute a "historical resource" pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(a) or has a "unique archaeological resource" pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21083.2(g), the Qualified Archaeologist shall coordinate with the applicant and the City to.develop a formal treatmentplan that would serve to reduce impacts to the resources. The treatment plan established for the resources shall be in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(f) for historical resources and Public Resources Code Sections 21083.2(b) for unique archaeological resources. Preservation in place (i.e., avoidance) is the preferred manner of treatment. If preservation in place is not feasible, treatment may include implementation of archaeological data recovery excavations to remove the resource along with subsequent laboratory •processing and analysis. Any historic archaeological material that is not Native American in origin shall be curated Rev 9-29-15 P299 P300 Initial Study for DRC2016-00206, SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 54 at a public, non-profit institution with a research interest in the materials, such as the San Bernardino County Museum, if such an institution agrees to accept the material. If no institution accepts the archaeological material, they shall be donated to a local school or historical society in the area for educational purposes. 4) In the event that significant Native American historical resources, as defined by CEQA (as amended, 2015), are discovered and avoidance cannot be ensured, an SOI -qualified archaeologist shall be retained to develop a cultural resources Treatment Plan, as well as a Discovery and Monitoring Plan, the drafts of which shall be provided to the GBMI-KN and the SMBMI for review and comment. All in -field investigations, assessments, and/or data recovery enacted pursuant to the finalized Treatment Plan shall be monitored by a GBMI-KN and SMBMI Tribal Participant(s). The Lead Agency and/or applicant shall, in good faith, consult with GBMI-KN and the SMBMI on the disposition and treatment of any artifacts or other cultural materials encountered during the project. 5) Non -Native American artifacts shall be inventoried, assessed, and analyzed for cultural affiliation, personal affiliation (prior ownership), function, and temporal placement. Subsequent to analysis and reporting, these artifacts shall be subjected to curation or returned to the Property Owner/Developer, as deemed appropriate. Once ground -altering activities have ceased or the Project Archaeologist determines that monitoring activities are no longer necessary, monitoring activities may be discontinued following notification to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. 18. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? () I Less Than () (✓) b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? () ; Significant Less (✓) Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? Impact Incorporated Impact Impact at a public, non-profit institution with a research interest in the materials, such as the San Bernardino County Museum, if such an institution agrees to accept the material. If no institution accepts the archaeological material, they shall be donated to a local school or historical society in the area for educational purposes. 4) In the event that significant Native American historical resources, as defined by CEQA (as amended, 2015), are discovered and avoidance cannot be ensured, an SOI -qualified archaeologist shall be retained to develop a cultural resources Treatment Plan, as well as a Discovery and Monitoring Plan, the drafts of which shall be provided to the GBMI-KN and the SMBMI for review and comment. All in -field investigations, assessments, and/or data recovery enacted pursuant to the finalized Treatment Plan shall be monitored by a GBMI-KN and SMBMI Tribal Participant(s). The Lead Agency and/or applicant shall, in good faith, consult with GBMI-KN and the SMBMI on the disposition and treatment of any artifacts or other cultural materials encountered during the project. 5) Non -Native American artifacts shall be inventoried, assessed, and analyzed for cultural affiliation, personal affiliation (prior ownership), function, and temporal placement. Subsequent to analysis and reporting, these artifacts shall be subjected to curation or returned to the Property Owner/Developer, as deemed appropriate. Once ground -altering activities have ceased or the Project Archaeologist determines that monitoring activities are no longer necessary, monitoring activities may be discontinued following notification to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. 18. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? () I () () (✓) b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? () ; () () (✓) c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? () () () (✓) d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? () () () (✓) Rev 9-29-15 Initial Study for DRC2016-00206, SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 55 e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? () Less Than () (✓) f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? () Significant Less (✓) Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitfgalion Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? () () () (✓) f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? () () () (✓) g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? () () () (✓) Comments: a) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP -1 and RP -4 treatment plants. The RP -1 capacity is sufficient to exceed the additional development within the western and southern areas of the City. The RP -4 treatment plant has a potential ultimate capacity of 28 mgd which is considered more than adequate to capacity to treat all increases in wastewater generation for buildout of the General Plan. The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. b) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP -4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP -1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which is at capacity. The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. c) All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The project is served by the CVWD water system. There is currently a sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this project. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. e) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP -4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP -1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which is at capacity. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. f) Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 9) Rev 9-29-15 This project complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste. The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. P301 P302 Initial Study for DRC2016-00206, SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 56 19. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE Less Than a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? O Signifioant Less ( ) Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No c) Does the project have environmental effects that will cause substantia[ adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Impact Incorporated Impact Impact ' 19. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? O (✓) () ( ) b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? () () () (V) c) Does the project have environmental effects that will cause substantia[ adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? () (✓) () ( ) Comments: a) The proposed project is located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between San Bernardino Road and Baker Avenue in a hillside area on the southerly flank of Red Hill and surrounding the historic Sycamore Inn restaurant. The project proposes to amend the General Plan to permit development on slopes 30 percent and greater, the subdivision of a 24.19 acre site into 6 parcels, and the development of 175 condominium units (including 9 live -work units) in the Mixed Use (MU) District. The project site characterized by the existing condominiums, vacant land and golf course land uses to the north, residential and commercial land uses to the west, the Pacific Electric Trail and Route 66 Trailhead to the east, and residential and commercial land uses to the south. According to the General Plan Figure RC -4, and Section 4.4 of the General Plan FPEIR, the project site isnot within an area of sensitive biological resources; therefore, development is not anticipated to adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the project is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan. A Burrowing Owl Survey & Nesting Bird Survey was prepared for the project site (RCA Associates, March 2017), which concluded that no active nests were observed and no diagnostic sign (feathers, pellets, fecal material, prey remains, etc.) of current nesting activities was detected during the survey, and that no native and/or non- native bird species recorded during the survey were currently utilizing the site for nesting. The contribution of the project to cumulative biological impacts is not expected to be cumulatively considerable as the project site is within an urban area, is relatively small, and is isolated from areas of better habitat. The Nesting Bird Surveys Report did not identify the presence of burrowing owl activity during the survey, however, due to the potential of the site to contain burrow sites and the ability of owls to begin using the site at any time, a preconstruction clearance survey is recommended prior to site disturbance. The site does contain a large number of mature trees which have the potential to provide nesting areas for migrating birds. To avoid any impact on nesting birds, it is recommended that a pre - construction nesting bird survey be conducted a maximum 3 days prior to ground breaking activity to avoid impact to birds protected under the Fish and Game Code and the Migratory Rev 9-29-15 P303 Initial Study for DRC2016-00206, SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 57 Bird Act. Mitigation measures have been added in the Biological Resources section of the study requiring the submission of a nesting bird survey and burrowing owl survey to the Planning Department prior to the issuance of a rough grading permit. No cultural resources are known to exist on the site; however, in the unlikely event that archaeological and paleontological resources are discovered during construction, mitigation measures are included to ensure proper handling and protection. b) If the proposed project were approved, then the applicant would be required to develop the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. The 2010 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of build -out in the City and Sphere -of -Influence. The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to Aesthetics, Agriculture and Forest Resources, Air Quality, Climate Change and Mineral Resources. Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources; however, they would not reduce impacts to less -than -significant levels. As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)). The Traffic Impact Study prepared for the project site (Linscott Law & Greenspan, September 2015) identifies that without project improvements the Red Hill Country Club Drive and Foothill will be at LOS F, and with improvements will improve to LOS C. These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use projects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space. With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is required. c) Development of the site under the proposed land use change would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. The Initial Study identifies construction -related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact and includes mitigation measures to reduce emission levels to a less than significant impact on the environment (see Air Quality section above for detailed analysis and mitigation measures). Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality would be short- term and would cease once construction activities were completed. As prescribed by SCAQMD, the Air Quality Assessment (Landrum & Brown, July 2015), and the Greenhouse Gas Assessment (Landrum & Brown, July 2015). This analysis concluded that because the on-site emissions are low, the emissions would not exceed the ambient air quality standards prescribed by the SCAQMD. The Initial Study identified potentially significant impacts associated with the exposure of people to increased noise levels. A Noise Impact Study Noise Analysis (Mestre Greve Associates, July 2015) was submitted for the project that reviewed the potential interior and exterior noise levels. The report concluded that with the proposed mitigation measures (see Noise section above for detailed analysis and mitigation measures), elevated interior and exterior noise levels created by adjacent roadways would be reduced to less than significant. EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier PER or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were Rev 9-29-15 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentiafiy significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Bird Act. Mitigation measures have been added in the Biological Resources section of the study requiring the submission of a nesting bird survey and burrowing owl survey to the Planning Department prior to the issuance of a rough grading permit. No cultural resources are known to exist on the site; however, in the unlikely event that archaeological and paleontological resources are discovered during construction, mitigation measures are included to ensure proper handling and protection. b) If the proposed project were approved, then the applicant would be required to develop the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. The 2010 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of build -out in the City and Sphere -of -Influence. The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to Aesthetics, Agriculture and Forest Resources, Air Quality, Climate Change and Mineral Resources. Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources; however, they would not reduce impacts to less -than -significant levels. As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)). The Traffic Impact Study prepared for the project site (Linscott Law & Greenspan, September 2015) identifies that without project improvements the Red Hill Country Club Drive and Foothill will be at LOS F, and with improvements will improve to LOS C. These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use projects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space. With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is required. c) Development of the site under the proposed land use change would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. The Initial Study identifies construction -related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact and includes mitigation measures to reduce emission levels to a less than significant impact on the environment (see Air Quality section above for detailed analysis and mitigation measures). Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality would be short- term and would cease once construction activities were completed. As prescribed by SCAQMD, the Air Quality Assessment (Landrum & Brown, July 2015), and the Greenhouse Gas Assessment (Landrum & Brown, July 2015). This analysis concluded that because the on-site emissions are low, the emissions would not exceed the ambient air quality standards prescribed by the SCAQMD. The Initial Study identified potentially significant impacts associated with the exposure of people to increased noise levels. A Noise Impact Study Noise Analysis (Mestre Greve Associates, July 2015) was submitted for the project that reviewed the potential interior and exterior noise levels. The report concluded that with the proposed mitigation measures (see Noise section above for detailed analysis and mitigation measures), elevated interior and exterior noise levels created by adjacent roadways would be reduced to less than significant. EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier PER or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were Rev 9-29-15 Initial Study for DRC2016-00206, SUBTT16605M, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 Page 58 addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply): (✓) (✓) V) General Plan FPEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified May 19, 2010) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115, Certified January 4, 1989) TECHNICAL APPENDICES (✓) (✓) V) V) V) V) V) (✓) (✓) V) V) Air Quality Assessment (Landrum & Brown, July 30, 2015) Arborist Report — Tree Inventory (Jim Borer, August 2, 2012) Archaeological Survey — Red Chief Motel Site (Applied Earthworks, August 28, 2012) Burrowing Owl Survey & Nesting Bird Survey (RCA Associates, March 16, 2017) Cultural Resource Assessment (Applied EarthWorks, May 15, 2017) Cultural Resource Assessment — Red Chief Motel Site (Emily Stadnicki, August 27, 2012) Geotechnical Engineering Report (Langan Engineering & Environmental Services, February 20, 2015) Greenhouse Gas Assessment (Landrum & Brown, July 30, 2015) Biological Assessment — Habitat Suitability Evaluation (Ecological Sciences, July 21, 2003) Biological Assessment — Habitat Suitability Evaluation — Update (RCA & Associates, May 25, 2017) Jurisdictional Waters Delineation (RCA Associates, LLC, August 14, 2017) (✓) Noise Analysis (Mestre Greve Associates, July 20, 2015) V) V) Rev 9-29-15 Traffic Impact Study (Linscott Law & Greenspan, November 1, 2016) Red Hill Country Club Neighborhood Area Traffic Study — Draft (KOA Corporation, February 2009) P304 initial Study for DRC2016-00206, SUBTT16605M, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 Page 59 (✓) Water Quality Management Plan -- Draft (David Evans and Associates, April 11, 2017) TECHNICAL APPENDICES (Utilized for GPA2004-00339, DRC2004-00352, SUBTT16605, and DRC2003-00637) V) V) Rev 9-29-15 An Archaeological Assessment of the Sycamore Village Project Site (Kathleen Del Chario, May 1990) An Historical Assessment of the Sycamore Village Project Site (Stephen Van Wormer, May 1990) P305 Initial Study for DRC2016-00206, SUBTT16605M, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 Page 60 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the aaplicant for the project described in this Initial Study. I acknowledge that 1 have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures. Further, I have revised the project plans or proposals andlor hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects would occur Applicant's Signature: 7 Print Name and Title: Kirnb -�� �u , I iarlgrq�� Rev 9-29-15 Date: 7//? P3O6 MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIALSTUDY III) ^~^^ ^ ^�~^^ ^~~^~ ~~^ ^~~^~^~�^~~ ^ ~~ ^ ~~~~ ^ PART ^^^x Project FUe No.: DF8C2O12-00872 Initial Study Prepared by: Tom Grahn, Associate Planner Applicant: Pacific Summit -Foothill, LLC Date: August 9, 2017 P307 Mitigation Measures No. / Implementing Action Responsible for Monitoring Monitoring Frequency Timing of Verification Method of Verification Verified Date /Initials Sanctions for Non -Compliance �^��� �`, �.,���� �������"�. 'c�' ��' ��--- � rr- ,.'-,------;:....:._-':.!-• ��.� '�����+`� �/`—. '�� . - �� �~��° `-- �,'�: �' ':"":,..7---• , -:�z�� -�-��-�. � �� �.�- `�'' .' Short Term Emissions 1) During grading aotivity, all construction equipment (?. 150 horsepower) shall be California Air Resources Board (CARB) Tier 3 Certified or better. PD/BO C Review of plans /VC 2/4 2) All u|aaring, gnading, earth -moving, or excavation actMties shall cease when winds exceed 25 mph per SCAQMD guidelines in order to limit fugitive dust emissions. PD/BO C Review of plans NC 2/4 3) The contractor shall ensure that all disturbed unpaved roads and disturbed areas within the Project are watered at least three (3) times daily during dry weather. VVoter|ng, with complete coverage of disturbed onamo, shall occur at least three times a day, preferably in the m[dnnnrnlng, ofternonn, and after work is done for the day. PD C Review of plans NC 2/4 4) The contractor shaU ensure that traffic speeds on unpaved roads and Project site areas are reduced to 15 miles per hour or ess. PD C Review of plans NC 2/4 5) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall beovui|db|eattheconotruct[on site for City verification. PD C Review of plans NC 2/4 6) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit Construction Plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that PD/80 C Review of plans C 2 Page 1 of 22 P308 Mitigation Measures No. / Implementing Action Responsible for Monitoring Monitoring Frequency Timing of Verification Method of Verification Verified Date /Initials Sanctions for Non -Compliance low -emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff. 7) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. PD C Review of plans NC 2/4 8) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction -grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. PD C Review of plans NC 2/4 9) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. BO B Review of plans NC 2 10) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low- pressure spray. BO C Review of plans NC 2/4 11) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: PD C Review of plans NC 2/4 • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. BO C Review of plans AIC 2/4 • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of Targe areas to erosion over extended periods of time. BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. BO C Review of plans A 4 • Sweep streets according to a schedule BO C During construction A 4 Page 2 of 22 P309 Mitigation Measures No. / Implementing Action Responsible for Monitoring Monitoring Frequency Timing of Verification Method of Verification Verified Date /Initials Sanctions for Non -Compliance established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 requirements. BO C During construction A 4 • Maintain a minimum 24 -inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. BO C During Construction A 4 12) The site shall be treated with water or other soil -stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB)) daily to reduce Particulate Matter PMio emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. BO C During construction A 4 13) Chemical soil -stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. BO C During construction A 4 Long Term Emissions 14) Provide adequate ingress and egress at all entrances to public facilities to minimize vehicle idling at curbsides. BO C Review of plans NC 2/4 15) Provide preferential parking to high occupancy vehicles and shuttle services. BO C Review of plans AIC 214 16) Schedule truck deliveries and pickups during off-peak hours. BO C Review of plans NC 214 17) Improve thermal integrity of the buildings and reduce thermal load with automated time clocks or occupant sensors. BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 18) Landscape with native and/or drought -resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. BO C Review of plans NC 214 19) Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planting programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC -01 measure. BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 Page 3 of 22 P310 Mitigation Measures No. / Implementing Action Responsible for Monitoring Monitoring Frequency Timing of Verification Method of Verification Verified Date /Initials Sanctions for Non -Compliance 20) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low- polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. PD C Review of plans D 2/3 21) All residential and commercial structures shall _ be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. PD C Review of plans D 2/3 22) All new development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District's Rule 445, Wood Burning Devices. Rule 445 was adopted in March 2008 to reduce emissions of PM2.5 and precludes the installation of indoor or outdoor wood burning devices (Le. fireplaces/hearths) in new development on or after March 9, 2009. PD C Review of plans D 2/3 Page 4 of 22 P311 Mitigation Measures No. / Implementing Action Responsible for Monitoring Monitoring Frequency Timing of Verification Method of Verification Verified Date /Initials Sanctions for Non -Compliance Sectioht Biological Resources 1- .,-�5 ... - _.._... ...... =_.. _ �d_4, r _ i . 1) Three days prior to the removal of vegetation or ground -disturbing activities, a breeding bird survey that is in conformance with the Migratory Bird Act shall be required to determine whether nesting is occurring. Occupied nests shall not be disturbed unless a qualified biologist verifies through non- invasive methods that either (a) the adult birds have not begun egg -laying or incubation; or (b) the juveniles from the occupied nests are foraging independently and are capable of independent survival. If the biologist is unable to verify one of the above conditions, then no disturbance shall occur within 300 feet of non - raptor nests, and within 5,000 feet of raptor nests, during the breeding season to avoid abandonment of the young. If nests are discovered, they shall be avoided through the establishment of an appropriate buffer setback, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. The temporary "no construction" area shall be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and ail nestlings have fledged and have left the nest, construction in the area may resume. PD B Review of plans B 2/4 2) Perform a Burrowing Owl Survey that is in conformance with the Department of Fish and Wildlife Staff Report on Burrowing Ow! Mitigation and submit the written report outlining the findings to the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) and the Planning Department within 30 days of groundbreaking activity. The survey shall include a habitat assessment, survey and impact analysis. The Burrowing Owl Survey shall follow the following protocol: PD , B Review of plans B 2/4 Page 5 of 22 P312 Mitigation Measures No. / Implementing Action Responsible for Monitoring Monitoring Frequency Timing of Verification Method of Verification Verified Date /Initials Sanctions for Non -Compliance • Burrowing Owl Survey methodology shall be based on Appendix D (Breeding and Non -breeding Season Surveys and Reports) of the CDFW Staff Report. Results of the pre -construction survey shall be provided to CDFW and the City. If the pre -construction survey does not identify burrowing owls on the project site, then no further mitigation is required. If burrowing owls are found to be utilizing the project site during the pre -construction survey, measures shall be developed by the qualified biologist in coordination with CDFW to avoid Impacting occupied burrows during the nesting period. These measures shall be based on the most current CDFW protocols and will at minimum include establishment of buffer setbacks from occupied burrows and owl monitoring. if ground -disturbing activities are delayed or suspended for more than 30 days after the pre -construction survey, the site shall be resurveyed for owls. _ • During the non -breeding season from September 1 through January 31, if burrows are occupied by migratory or non - migratory resident burrowing owls during a pre -construction survey, burrow exclusion and/or closure may be used to exclude owls from those burrows. Burrow exclusion and/or closure should only be conducted by a qualified wildlife biologist in coordination with CDFW using the most current CDFW guidelines. • During the avian nesting season from February 1 through August 31, if nests are discovered, they shall be avoided through establishment of an appropriate buffer Page 6 of 22 P313 Mitigation Measures No. / Implementing Action Responsible for Monitoring Monitoring Frequency Timing of Verification Method of Verification Verified Date /Initials Sanctions for Non -Compliance setback, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. The temporary "no construction" area would have to be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and have left the nest, construction in the area may resume. 3) Prior to issuance of any grading permit, the Project Applicant shall provide to the City of Rancho Cucamonga either of the following: Written correspondence from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife stating that notification under Section 1602 of the California Fish and Game Code is not required for the project; or a copy of a Department executed Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement, authorizing impacts to California Fish and Game Code, section 1602 resources associated with the project. PD/BO B Review of report 13 2 y yn /��.e 3'. ti• -v;; ! 0. 1'v....:;. 6. ,4;,,, w- SeVtion5 Cultural Resources Y b b• kr 3 {' f 4."! -'-'-'-i!*`--` {° "+t ."A n` . 4e. d v S `� m 7, - .!t"..�.v ... x r .: s 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. PD/BO C Review of report ND 3/4 • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. PD/BO C Review of report ND 3/4 Page 7 of 22 P314 Mitigation Measures No. / Implementing Action Responsible for Monitoring Monitoring Frequency Timing of Verification Method of Verification Verified Date /Initials Sanctions for Non -Compliance • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. PD/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 • Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with Section 21083.2 Archeological resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, including but not limited to, avoiding archeological sites, capping or covering site with soil, planning the site as a park or green space or paying an in-kind mitigation fee. P/D BIC Review of Plans/Report During Construction ND • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report, with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. PD C Review of report AID 3/4 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (Le., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: PD B Review of report AID 4 • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth -disturbing activities. PD B Review of report AID 4 • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth - disturbing activities elsewhere until the BO BIC Review of report ND 4 Page 8 of 22 P315 Mitigation Measures No. / Implementing Action Responsible for Monitoring Monitoring Frequency Timing of Verification Method of Verification Verified Date /Initials Sanctions for Non -Compliance monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). PD D Review of report D 3 , • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy to the report to San Bernardino County Museum. PD D Review of report D 3 .Section6 Geology an r -Soils % - 7 5 is ; 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil -stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PMio emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re- planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. BO C During construction A 4 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PMio emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. BO C During construction A 4 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PMio emissions from the site during such episodes. BO C During construction A 4 4) Chemical soil -stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PMio emissions. BO C During construction A 4 1Sectioni' ' ,Greehliouse:Gas Emissions " .. }} ?.k ^ _ i 1A` .ai' .. n. .... x r r w ..—✓, F'- _. ...wv ay .. . .-..... '' - 5-.. N .,. . - # _ i__.r. ..._ r_ .. Cumulative Short Term (Construction) GHG Emissions 1) The project must comply with all rules that BO C During construction A 4 Page 9 of 22 P316 Mitigation Measures No. ! Implementing Action Responsible for Monitoring Monitoring Frequency Timing of Verification Method of Verification Verified Date /Initials Sanctions for Non -Compliance assist in reducing short-term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAWMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil -stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 2) The construction contractor shall select construction equipment based on low -emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures' specification. BO C During construction A 4 3) Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 minutes. BO C During construction A 4 4) Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline- or diesel -powered engines where feasible. _ BO C During construction A 4 5) Construction should be timed so as not to interfere with peak -hour traffic. BO C During construction A 4 6) Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be supported and encouraged for construction crew. BO C During construction A 4 Cumulative Long Term (Operational) GHG Emissions 7) Construction and Building materials shall be produced and/or manufactured locally. Use "Green Building Materials" such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low -volatile -organic -compound (VOC) materials. BO A During Construction C 2 8) Design all buildings to exceed California Building Code Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of: • increased insulation. • Limit air leakage through the structure. • Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling BO A During Construction C 2 Page 10 of 22 P317 Mitigation Measures No. / Implementing Action Responsible for Monitoring Monitoring Frequency Timing of Verification Method of Verification Verified Date /Initials Sanctions for Non -Compliance equipment, light fixtures, and appliances. o Landscape and developed site utilizing shade, prevailing winds, and landscaping. • Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems. • Install light colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements. • Install solar or light emitting diodes (LED's) for outdoor lighting. 9) Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and include the following: • Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. • Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available and/or install the infrastructure to deliver and use reclaimed water. • Design building to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets, dual flush toilets, and waterless urinals/water heaters. • Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non -vegetated surfaces. BO - A During Construction C 2 10) Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclab[es and green waste in public areas. Educated employees about reducing waste and about recycling. CE A Review of plans C 2 ,TSectioxandi WaterQualit3IT nd9 ,H` drolo' �i:�F.. .. ..;-. J,. -^' F .:,lY'...'r • - M4. y+ . - Construction Activities 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Building Official for BO BICID Review of plans A/C 2/4 Page 11 of 22 P318 Mitigation Measures No. / Implementing Action Responsible for Monitoring Monitoring Frequency Timing of Verification Method of Verification Verified Date /Initials Sanctions for Non -Compliance approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. BO B/C/D Review of plans NC 2/4 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. BO BICID Review of plans NC 2/4 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. BO BICID Review of plans NC 2/4 5) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (Le., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the BO B/C/D Review of plans NC 2/4 Page 12of22 P319 Mitigation Measures No. / Implementing Action Responsible for Monitoring Monitoring Frequency Timing of Verification Method of Verification Verified Date /Initials Sanctions for Non -Compliance City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Post -Construction Operational 6) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. BO BICID Review of plans NC 2/4 7) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. BO B/C/D Review of plans • NC 2/4 Grading Activities 8) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. BO BICID Review of plans NC 2/4 9) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, BO BICID Review of plans A/C 2/4 Page 13 of 22 P320 Mitigation Measures No. / implementing Action Responsible for Monitoring Monitoring Frequency Timing of Verification Method of Verification Verified Date /Initials Sanctions for Non -Compliance the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. 10) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (David Evans and Associates, April 2017) to reduce construction pollutants from entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. BO B/C/D Review of plans NC 2/4 Section=12 Noise - .� s: ..:� w..„.L. _. _. — w. . ,gin _.. . , s ,• ... . i..... _... _ .... • _.:a �.._ ... Exterior 1) Prior to the issuance of any grading plans a construction -related noise mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. The Plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction. PD/BO B Review of plans A/C 2/4 2) During all project site excavation and grading, the project contractors shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers consistent with the manufacturers' standards. BO B Review of plans NC 2/4 3) The project contractor shall place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors nearest the project site. BO B Review of plans NC 2/4 4) The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction - related noise sources and noise -sensitive receptors nearest the project site during all project construction. BO B Review of plans AIC 2/4 Page 14 of 22 P321 Mitigation Measures No. 1 Implementing Action Responsible for Monitoring Monitoring Frequency Timing of Verification Method of Verification Verified Date /Initials Sanctions for Non -Compliance 5) The construction contractor shall obtain the City's approval for its haul plan, with the planned haul truck routes avoiding residential areas to the extent feasible. CE B Review of plans D 2/4 6) The construction contractor shall change the timing and/or sequence of the noisiest construction operations to avoid sensitive times of the day. PD/BO C Review of plans A 2/4 7) Prior to the issuance of any grading plans, the applicant shall submit a construction -related noise mitigation plan for Planning Director review and approval. This plan shall depict the location of construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction of the project. PD B Review of plans C 2/4 8) During construction, the contractor shall ensure all construction equipment is equipped with appropriate noise attenuating devices. PD B Review of plans A/C 2/4 9) Idling equipment shall be turned off when not in use. PD B Review of plans A/C 2/4 10) Equipment shall be maintained so that vehicles and their loads are secured from rattling and banging. PD B Review of plans A/C 2/4 11) In order to meet the 65 CNEL exterior noise standard, noise barriers ranging from 4 to 5.5 feet (Noise Analysis, Mestre Greve Associates, July 2015, Exhibit 3) will be required along Foothill Boulevard. The noise barriers may consist of a wall, berm, or combination of the two. The noise barriers must have a surface density of at least 3.5 pounds per square foot, and shall have no openings or gaps. The wall may be constructed of stud and stucco, 3/8 - inch plate glass, or 5/8 -inch Plexiglas, any masonry material, or a combination of these materials. The first floor exterior living areas are projected to meet the 65 CNEL outdoor noise standard with the specified noise barriers. The walls shall be located at the top of slope. PD B Review of plans NC 214 Page 15 of 22 P322 Mitigation Measures No. / Implementing Action Responsible for Monitoring Monitoring Frequency Timing of Verification Method of Verification Verified Date /Initials Sanctions for Non -Compliance Interior 12) For proper acoustical performance, all exterior windows and doors, and sliding glass doors must have a positive seal and leaks/cracks must be kept to a minimum. PD B Review of plans A/C 2/3 13) To prevent sound leaks the following should be provided: BO BIC Review of plans NC 2/3 • On concrete slab, the first layer of 5/8" gypsum board on the unit side should be sealed top and bottom with resilient caulk, as well as around the junction boxes. BO BID Review of plans AIC 2/3 • Window rough -in seams should be no greater than 14", and all seams should be caulked with resilient caulking. BO B/D _ Review of plans AJC 2/3 • Seal, caulk, gasket or weather-strip all joints and seams to eliminate air leakage through these assemblies. Includes around window and doorframes, at penetrations through walls, and all other openings in the building envelope. BO B/D Review of plans A/C 2/3 14) All first floor rooms are projected to meet the 45 CNEL interior noise standard through the installation of the exterior noise barriers along Foothill Boulevard. All rooms, including second and third floor units, are projected to meet the 45 CNEL interior noise standard without building upgrades. BO B/C/D Review of plans NC 2/4 15) All buildings exposed to noise levels greater than 57 CNEL will meet the 45 CNEL interior noise standard only with windows closed. Adequate ventilation, with windows closed, will be required for those units adjacent to Foothill Boulevard (Noise Analysis, Mestre Greve Associates, July 2015, Exhibit 4). BO B/CJD Review of plans AIC 2/4 16) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 17) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 Page 16 of 22 P323 Mitigation Measures No. 1 Implementing Action Responsible for Monitoring Monitoring Frequency Timing of Verification Method of Verification Verified Date /Initials Sanctions for Non -Compliance Development Code Section 17.66.050, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 18) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes and include appropriate noise mitigation measures. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. BO BICID Review of plans NC 214 Section 177 Tribal Cultural` Resources 7.- - - _ ._ ' . -- = - - - 1) The applicant shall contact the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation (GBMI- KN) and the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians (SMBMI) to discuss Tribal Monitoring of the project during all ground disturbing activities, and any trenching below the initial grade level, to ensure that cultural resources that may be encountered during ground disturbances are protected and preserved for study. The monitor(s) must be approved by the Tribal Representatives and wilt be present on - PD/BO C Review of plans ND 3/4 Page 17 of 22 P324 Mitigation Measures No. / Implementing Action Responsible for Monitoring Monitoring Frequency Timing of Verification Method of Verification Verified Date /initials Sanctions for Non -Compliance site during ground disturbing activities. The Native American Monitor(s) will complete monitoring logs on a daily basis. The logs will provide descriptions of the daily activities, including construction activities, locations, soil, and any cultural materials identified. In addition, the monitor(s) will be required to provide insurance certificates, including liability insurance, for any archaeological resource(s) encountered during grading and excavation activities pertinent to the provisions outlined in the California Environmental Quality Act, California Public Resources Code Division 13, and Section 21083.2 (a) through (k). The on- site monitoring shall end when the project site grading and excavation activities are completed, or when the Tribal Representatives and monitor have indicated that the site has a low potential for archeological resources. The applicant shall submit the results of these consultations to the City prior to issuance of grading permits for the project site. 2) In the event that human remains or funerary objects are encountered during any activities associated with the project, work in the immediate vicinity (within a 100 -foot buffer of the find) shall cease and the County Coroner shall be contacted pursuant to State Health and Safety Code §7050.5, and that code shall be enforced for the duration of the project. Prior to the start of ground disturbing activities, the land owner shall arrange a designated site location within the footprint of the project for the respectful reburial of the human remains and/or ceremonial objects. Any discoveries of human skeletal material shall be immediately reported to the County Coroner. The monitor will then notify the Qualified Archaeologist and the construction manager who will call the coroner. Work will continue to be diverted PD/BO C Review of plans AID 3/4 Page 18 of 22 P325 Mitigation Measures No. / Implementing Action Responsible for Monitoring Monitoring Frequency Timing of Verification Method of Verification Verified Date /Initials Sanctions for Non -Compliance while the coroner determines whether the remains are Native American. The discovery is to be kept confidential and secure to prevent any further disturbance. If Native American, the coroner will notify the NAHC as mandated by state law who will then appoint a Most Likely Descendent. In the case where discovered human remains cannot be fully documented and recovered on the same day, the remains will be covered with muslin cloth and a steel plate that can be moved by heavy equipment placed over the excavation opening to protect the remains. If this type of steel plate is not available, a 24 hour guard should be posted outside of working hours. The Tribe(s) will make every effort to recommend diverting the project and keeping the remains in situ and protected. If the project cannot be diverted, it may be determined that burials will be removed. The Tribe(s) will work closely with the Qualified Archaeologist to ensure that the excavation is treated carefully, ethically, and respectfully. If data recovery is approved by the Tribe(s), documentation shall be taken which includes at a minimum detailed descriptive notes and sketches. Additional types of documentation shall be approved by the Tribe(s) for data recovery purposes. - Cremations will either be removed in bulk or by means as necessary to ensure completely recovery of all material. If the discovery of human remains includes 4 or more burials, the location is considered a cemetery and a separate treatment plan shall be created. The project applicant shall consult with the Tribe(s) regarding avoidance of all cemetery sites. Once complete, a final report of all activities are to be submitted to the NAHC. The Tribe(s) do NOT authorize any scientific study or the utilization of any invasive diagnostics on human remains. Page 19 of 22 P326 Mitigation Measures No. / Implementing Action Responsible for Monitoring Monitoring Frequency Timing of Verification Method of Verification Verified Date /Initials Sanctions for Non -Compliance 3) In the event that Native American cultural resources are discovered during project activities, all work in the immediate vicinity of the find (within a 60 -foot buffer) shall cease and a qualified archaeologist meeting Secretary of Interior standards shall be hired to assess the find. Work on the other portions of the project outside of the buffered area may continue during this assessment period. The archaeologist shall contact the GBMI-KN and the SMBMI for input regarding the preservation, retention and final disposition of any discovered cultural resources. The archaeologist shall prepare a mitigation plan and technical resources management report, which shall document the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Additionally, the GBMI-KN and the SMBMI will be contacted if any such find occurs and be provided information and permitted/invited to perform a site visit when the archaeologist makes his/her assessment, so as to provide Tribal input. All archaeological resources unearthed by project construction activities shall be evaluated by the Qualified Archaeologist and Native Monitor. if the resources are Native American in origin, the Tribe(s) shall coordinate with the landowner regarding treatment and curation of these resources. Typically, the Tribe(s) will request reburial or preservation for educational purposes. If a resource is determined by the Qualified Archaeologist to constitute a "historical resource" pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(a) or has a "unique archaeological resource" pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21083.2(g), the Qualified Archaeologist shall coordinate with the applicant and the City to develop a formal PD/BO C Review of plans ND 3/4 Page 20 of 22 P327 Mitigation Measures No. / Implementing Action Responsible for Monitoring Monitoring Frequency Timing of Verification Method of Verification Verified Date /Initials Sanctions for Non -Compliance treatment plan that would serve to reduce impacts to the resources. The treatment plan established for the resources shall be in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(f) for historical resources and Public Resources Code Sections 21083.2(b) for unique archaeological resources. Preservation in place (i.e., avoidance) is the preferred manner of treatment. If preservation in place is not feasible, treatment may include implementation of archaeological data recovery excavations to remove the resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and analysis. Any historic archaeological material that is not Native American in origin shall be curated at a public, non-profit institution with a research interest in the materials, such as the San Bernardino County Museum, if such an institution agrees to accept the material. If no institution accepts the archaeological material, they shall be donated to a local school or historical society in the area for educational purposes. 4) In the event that significant Native American historical resources, as defined by CEQA (as amended, 2015), are discovered and avoidance cannot be ensured, an SOI -qualified archaeologist shall be retained to develop a cultural resources Treatment Plan, as well as a Discovery and Monitoring Plan, the drafts of which shall be provided to the GBMI-KN and the SMBMI for review and comment. All in -field investigations, assessments, and/or data recovery enacted pursuant to the finalized Treatment Plan shall be monitored by a GBMI- KN and SMBMI Tribal Participant(s). The Lead Agency and/or applicant shall, in good faith, consult with GBM1-KN and the SMBMI on the disposition and treatment of any PD/BO C Review of plans A/D 3/4 Page 21 of 22 P328 Mitigation Measures No. / Implementing Action Responsible for Monitoring Monitoring Frequency Timing of Verification Method of Verification Verified Date /initials Sanctions for Non -Compliance artifacts or other cultural materials encountered during the project. 1 - Withhold Recordation of Final Map PD - Planning Director or designee B - Prior To Construction B - Other Agency Permit / Approval 2 - Withhold Grading or Building Permit CE - City Engineer or designee 5) Non -Native American artifacts shall be inventoried, assessed, and analyzed for cultural affiliation, personal affiliation (prior ownership), function, and temporal placement. PD/BO C Review of plans ND D - Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/ Plans) 3/4 Subsequent to analysis and reporting, these artifacts shall be subjected to curation or returned to the Property Owner/Developer, as deemed appropriate. E - Operating 5 - Retain Deposit or Bonds FC - Fire Chief or designee6 Once ground -altering activities have ceased or the Project Archaeologist determines that monitoring activities are no longer necessary, monitoring activities may be discontinued following notification to the City of Rancho 7 - Citation Cucamonga Planning Department. Key to Checklist Abbreviations ,:Resportsibie Person°w rt ., .�,A. •.. �.. - -- .� rte.�- �"s I Monitoring`Prequency �r .r .. .- 1.- :Method of Verification - • "" _ x � :Sanction's-.: =': 4 CDD - Community Development Director or designee A - With Each New Development A - On-site Inspection 1 - Withhold Recordation of Final Map PD - Planning Director or designee B - Prior To Construction B - Other Agency Permit / Approval 2 - Withhold Grading or Building Permit CE - City Engineer or designee C - Throughout Construction C - Plan Check 3 - Withhold Certificate of Occupancy BO - Building Official or designee D - On Completion D - Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/ Plans) 4 - Stop Work Order PO - Police Captain or designee E - Operating 5 - Retain Deposit or Bonds FC - Fire Chief or designee6 - Revoke CUP 7 - Citation Page 22 of 22 City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: General Plan Amendment DRC2016-00206, Tentative Tract Map Modification SUBTT16605M, Design Review DRC2012-00672, Variance DRC2016-00207, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2012-00673. This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above -listed project. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components — This MMP contains the following elements: 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project. 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management—The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project planner, assigned by the Planning Director, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures — The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. 2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address: City of Rancho Cucamonga — Lead Agency Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 �C g/zs/17 EXHIBIT Q P329 P330 Mitigation Monitoring Program GPA DRC2016-00207, SUBTT16605M, DR DRC2012-00672, VAR DRC2016-00207, and TRP DRC2012-00673 Page 2 3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed, as determined by the project planner, or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner. 4. The project planner, or responsible City department, will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development. 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. 7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The Department shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time, 9. In those instances requiring Tong -term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or Planning Director prior to the issuance of building permits. City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Mitigated Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: General Plan Amendment DRC2016-00206, Tentative Tract Map Modification SUBTT16605M, Design Review DRC2012-00672, Variance DRC2016-00207, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2012-00673. Public Review Period Closes: August 9, 2017 Project Name: Sycamore Heights Project Applicant: Chad Stadnicki Pacific Summit -Foothill, LLC 212 S. Palm Avenue, 2nd Floor Alhambra, CA 91801 Project Location (also see attached map): The project site is located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between San Bernardino Road and Baker Avenue in a hillside area on the southerly flank of Red Hill and surrounding the historic Sycamore Inn restaurant. Project Description: The applicant, Pacific Summit -Foothill, LLC, proposes an amendment to the General Plan to revise tables and text, including clarifying text as necessary to allow the development of land that contains slopes of 30 percent or greater, a Tentative Tract Map to subdivide a property of 24.19 acres into 6 parcels, and a Design Review for the development of 175 condominium units (including 9 live -work units) located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between Red Hill Country Club Drive and the Pacific Electric Trail. FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Mitigated Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but: (1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project, as revised, may have a significant effect on the environment. If adopted, the Mitigated Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. The factual and analytical basis for this finding is included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration during the review period. Date of Determination Adopted By P331 DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE Inland Deserts Region 3602 Inland Empire Blvd., Suite C-220 Ontario, CA 91764 (909) 484-0167 www.wildlife.ca.Qov July 27, 2017 Sent via entail Mr. Thomas Grahn City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 tom.grahn(c�cityofrc.us EDMUN 3. L.. c; yl/J. Jr., ucv.:rrror CHARLTON H. BONHAM, Director CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMC': JUL 2 7 2017 RECEIVED - PLAN INC Subject: Initial Study with Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration GPA DRC2016-00206, SUBTT16605M, DR DRC2012-00672, VAR DRC2016-03207, & TRP DRC2012-00673 (Sycamore Heights Project) State Clearinghouse No. 2017071010 Dear Mr. Grahn: The Department of Fish and Wildlife (Department) appreciates the opportunity to comment on the Initial Study and proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) for General Plan Amendment DRC2016-00206, Tentative Tract Map Modification SUBTT16605M, Design review DRC2012-00672, Variance DRC2016-00207, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2012-00673, referred to as the Sycamore Heights Project (project) [State Clearinghouse No. 2017071010). The Department is responding to the IS/MND as a Trustee Agency for fish and wildlife resources (California Fish and Game Code Sections 711.7 and 1802. and the California Environmental Quality Act [CEQA] Guidelines Section 15386), and as a Responsible Agency regarding any discretionary actions (CEQA Guidelines Section 15381), such as the issuance of a Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement (California Fish and Game Code Sections 1600 et seq.) and/or a California Endangered Species Act (CESA) Permit for Incidental Take of Endangered, Threatened, and/or Candidate species (California Fish and Game Code Sections 2080 and 2080.1). The project proposes the development of 175 attached condominium units on 24.19 acres located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between Red Hill Country Club Drive and the Pacific Electric Trail, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. San Bernardino County. (.onseruing (:alifornia's 'Wildlife Since 187(.1 Pc ?/23/17 EXHIBIT R -12332 Mitigated Negative Declaration Sycamore Heights Project SCH No. 2017071010 Page 2 of 3 COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The Department has jurisdiction over the conservation, protection, and management of fish, wildlife, native plants, and the habitat necessary for biologically sustainable populations of those species (i.e., biological resources); and administers the Natural Community Conservation Planning Program (NCCP Program). The Department offers the comments and recommendations presented below to assist the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City; the CEQA lead agency) in adequately identifying and/or mitigating the project's significant, or potentially significant, impacts on biological resources. The Department's comments and recommendations on the IS/MND include: Jurisdictional Waters Please note that the Department requires notification for work undertaken in or near any river, stream, or lake that flows at least episodically, including ephemeral streams, desert washes, and watercourses with a subsurface flow. Fish and Game Code section 1602 states, "An entity may not substantially divert or obstruct the natural flow of, or substantially change or use any material from the bed, channel, or bank of, any river, stream, or lake, or deposit or dispose of debris, waste, or other material containing crumbled, flaked, or ground pavement where it may pass into any river, stream, or lake, unless all of the following occur...." Upon receipt of a complete notification, the Department determines if the activities may substantially adversely affect existing fish and wildlife resources. The July 21, 2003 Ecological Sciences, Inc., 2003 Habitat Suitability Evaluation states (Page 4) "The site is...bisected by several north -south trending drainages (n=4)" and (Page 12) "...based on our initial site visit and general jurisdictional analysis, several potentially jurisdictional features are present on site (e.g., four generally north -south trending drainages." Page 12 of the 2003 Habitat Suitability Evaluation also comments that "A formal delineation for either state or federal wetland jurisdiction was not conducted for this analysis" and that "Further analysis would be necessary to determine jurisdictional status and more fully evaluate the need for permitting prior to site development." Despite the recommendation for further analysis, the Department was unable to ascertain (based on the documents circulated for review) whether further analysis was completed. Based on review of aerial photography, the site plan, and conceptual grading plan (copies of the latter two were requested for review by the Department) the Department recommends that prior to adoption of the MND the City condition a new mitigation measure requiring that the project applicant submit a Notification of Lake or Streambed Alteration to the Department's Lake and Streambed P333 Mitigated Negative Declaration Sycamore Heights Project SCH No. 2017071010 Page 3 of 3 Alteration Program at the Ontario office. Specifically, the Department requests that the City condition the inclusion of the following new mitigation measure in the MND: Mitigation Measure BIO -3: Prior to issuance of any grading permit Project Applicant shall provide to the City of Rancho Cucamonga either of the following: Written correspondence from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife stating that notification under Section 1602 of the California Fish and Game Code is not required for the project, or a copy of a Department - executed Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement, authorizing impacts to California Fish and Game Code, section 1602 resources associated with the project. Department Conclusions and Further Coordination The Department appreciates the opportunity to comment on the IS/MND for the Sycamore Heights Project (SCH No. 2017071010), and we request that the City of Rancho Cucamonga condition the inclusion of Mitigation Measure B1O-3 prior to adoption of the MND. If you should have any questions pertaining to the comments provided in this letter, please contact Joanna Gibson at (909) 987-7449 or at joanna.gibsoncwildlife.ca.gov. Sincerely, Le T `. cNair gional Manager ec: State Clearinghouse P334 CP! ©i RANCHO C'UCAMONGA AUG 0 7 2017 PauCow�M,ssloRECEIVED - PLANNING C i+y o -F Rafoho Ooca Mocha vcT Cord be P335 Rao -110 Cocaniorva,Cfl Rf730 610R) 4131- o BSc t}o9ust t, Z-017 My concerns about- +he proposed 1 [.gh 1opine4 ai-e expressed below and in +he attached fewsp ? fer 6rtrcje, Pne aI PIso f (?men Required +c , p erin jt- development a -C cIop in excess o� 3a%, q. vs Those oI iv I n� up h i 11 -Prowl +-he prcdec f have beenassurrec)-Hia-I-- boi ld i nj. on -f-hese ex^ec-1 P F- y sa-PeHowever, we .Were giver) f hash same aLl.gorances whein 6or com►vf( jf- W hold-) yet c5om� of +he dopes .gave waywi+hio a yew-~ And be&cuse insfahiii+y a¢ Red frod j6ckin3 has been reR uired +6 s -1-a b; I ; ze solve op our units. .3'r61y i c Ve h fele �-ri ps eenerat� by +his prvjec-!- vv/ 1! exacerba-I--ndifions a+ probably -!-be worst int8rsea-1 on in +he Ci+ Foothill ancf RedHi if Coun+ry Club Drive. A+ least- 3sc' vebbicles YWilt be b8se4 in +he corvjMOnify and who knows how much-I-ra-p-p/ . +he lr'e-Wor( Omit- will areafe, with 004/ one Way in and out .11c) rJ./ht torus only, exi+in ori Vers who wish -t-o-f-ravel eas-l- will have -f-a initially pr-oceedi execufe a 07t -urn some wham a nd bead back (or cof ouer Red H;11), Eastbound dr(ver who want -to en+or the developrnnht- tx/ 11 have +0 reverse -1-t) process. -aoMe lessneg Norrie less peof le sometimes clamp on t'hi:s fora erty. ?Qui 1cLr r +his prczject wi 11 not s'o1Ue the pr'oblety? -- rf wr 11 onfy Ca()se these inc(iuidoa(s `r0 r ioca+-e. z+., +h e C• i- v and deuelope~r-.are serroos about a 1 !e -v ia-i-i n howlei ssr?ess1, -they should coordinate with a encies +hal- Cary provide + be sh !-f"±r and assistance with meatal hea th a,nci sub'Stone, zb �sso�s' that -i-hese pooh Io,sT Souks need. uric yov +o casvr nqa+ive vo1-es' CO ,911 o- 1 -he acts' e� +his pr�ec-j- you have -F na 1 approval a u+hor i -1-t -po r and rC- onn►vlenc] + o +he City Coonci 1 +Fhat it reject -1--he rec1Oirec( General Pl R Rmendment. developer clreatea prgject +hal- can Pe boiItid vjaisor 'Than i< you I-1-Fach m en t pc 2/i3/I7 EXHIBIT S S t ncere l y) Henry S` -fay ONCEPRISTINERED.11WCOMMUNITY----I0113$011817 CONDOS, 150-.11108E VEHICLES-:ON-...STEEF-;.$1(1pf$7.;.:7...: By Sherm Goldstein 'LongtiMpl3anIchO Cucamong-a.reSideni • .1 and former elected official,Hai*•Stoy_loolcs..,, out fiOrn';his balcony at the gorgeous view • • of the CUCamonga Valley. That view:will be ruinedif the cits..c,p'00lsigns off on a 175 - unit condomittlymVoje4 by Pacific Sum- - mit-Foothill 1..1,c, ovifnela*43.Y. Properties - of AlhaMbra.T_Fik.projty.(0.ps around the _ Sycamore Inn, and -00544s up the last remaining undevelc0e44e of historic Red Hill. 1 not the -rOtderit:14spleta,tularviewl that irk i4th instabji 'of tlL_gtmeaafeL..-- remove 'cil arOthelainecoiiie. have giVehlNey in the_06'st,'aiiii-fr* and structures have slid down.Hcirneowners like Stoy ask, why tempt fate? Most of the slope's grade is'30% or more, requir- , ing speCial: . . slope. With three or four-story structures handling and» Closer to -Foothill Boulevard;175- units approval by the would fifat the bottom of the hiII,away • 'city countoil•in from -the ilOpe:'Such desrgns are common order to amend on thoroughfares throughout Southern the City's gen- Anaheirn,...la.Verne,:and.Brea, eral pan, which for example- • ' . • • prohibited the . But concerned citizens are also upset ,development .abouttheInVpact'on traffic At least 50 ptsiopes.great:- morecarS,Williqd dumped onto -•er than 30% -Boylevar-51.beep Grove and the'Syc2. grade: "_iThe. The interSectiOn a F6Othill, .„.. • r,'0,r9113.!arl - took poinuchtiMeand..money to develop; witfr-so mu.ch. Community:input; why -even 'HAVE a ieneral plan if vou'r&going to:, • .keep amendingitr laments Stoy. . 'In 2006, scmilar proposal. came befose. the city•Council.,Cquncil members Diane • Williamsand Rex'GutierrezVoted against it, but it still passed The failing economy and recession then hit, and the project was scuttled. Gutierrez is off the council: Ob- servers are wondering how Ms Williams - will vote this tithe around. Her colleagues, Mayor Dennis Michael, and councilmen' Sam Spagnolo and Bill Alexander, voted for the'project'in 200 Will they continue to alter the city's landscape? , A possible solution would be to approve • the project, but keep' condos off the-qtppr • BoUleyarc(anO•GrOve.i•problematic; espe- • , - • . ciallyduring rush hour.There-Wili only be -one way,in•anclOut ofthe development, IDetween.the-Sycamorp lnn anctRed Hill Country-Club.Drive;- That entry vill be most easdy accessible for vehicles heading west -on .Foothill. Vehicles-travelingeaSt on Foot- hill coming fromUplandvvill:be.-rhet with a cement.meclian, so they -Will have to make a u -turn farther-doum Foothill and come- . back. rhe'entire project does nothing for Ran- cho Cucamonga other than decrease the quality.of life, believes HankStoy. "Devel- opment isn't peOgress,7 says StOy,."it's just more of the same— traffic, pollution, and loss of Red Hill's character." Grapei.HIe Press' A • Alaylcizne ao. 17 P337 RESOLUTION NO. 17-75 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2016-00206 TO AMEND TABLES AND TEXT, INCLUDING CLARIFYING TEXT AS NECESSARY, IN THE GENERAL PLAN TO ALLOW THE DEVELOPMENT OF LAND THAT CONTAINS SLOPES OF 30 PERCENT OR GREATER; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. 1. Pacific Summit Foothill, LLC, filed an application for General Pian Amendment No. DRC2016-00206 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 9th day of August 2017, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and continued the application to the August 23, 2017 Planning Commission meeting. 3. On the 23rd of August, 2017, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing on August 9, 2017 and August 23, 2017, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The General Plan Slope Development Guidelines address the development of parcels with a range of natural slopes that range from "5% or less" to "30% and over"; and b. The application proposes to amend the Slope Development Guidelines to establishing to provide an exception to the development of slopes "30% and over" provided certain site conditions can be met; and c. Proposed applicable exceptions address the project location, percentage of development on surrounding properties, and slope stability and other geological factors of the site, and vegetation fuel management for wildfire protection; and d. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and Attachment 2 P338 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-75 DRC2016-00206 -- PACIFIC SUMMIT FOOTHILL, LLC August 23, 2017 Page 2 e. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element by allowing for the implementation of the Mixed Use designation in this area; and f. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the proposed amendment is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area the application will only apply to properties located south of Banyan Avenue in the Red Hill area of the City, all of the properties surrounding the project site have been developed, and the project site has been designed to appropriately address slope stability and other geologic factors of the site; and b. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties as the amendment will only apply to properties located south of Banyan Avenue in the Red Hill area of the City and will riot have citywide development implications, all of the properties surrounding the project site have been developed and portions of the project site have been previously disturbed (i.e., development of the Red Chief Motel, Sycamore inn, abandoned water basin, and surrounding residential, commercial and public developments), and the project site has been designed to appropriately address slope stability and other geologic factors of the site; and c. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. The Hillside Development criteria of the General Plan and Development Code were not intended to apply as uniformly to Mixed Use designated parcels as they do to a Residential designated parcel. The intent of the Hillside Development criteria density restriction was to address natural slopes, particularly those located in the foothill areas north of Banyan Street. Here, the project site has been previously disturbed (i.e., development of the Red Chief Motel, Sycamore Inn, abandoned water basin, and surrounding residential, commercial and public developments) so that the site is no longer in a natural condition. Because few, if any other sites with a "30% and over" slopes exist south of Banyan Street, the amendment will have limited application. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends the City Council adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. P339 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-75 DRC2016-00206 -- PACIFIC SUMMIT FOOTHILL, LLC August 23, 2017 Page 3 A comment letter was received from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) on July 27, 2017 in response to the circulated IS/MND. The only comment CDFW had was in relation to the possible Jurisdictional Waters on the project site. The applicant and their biologists prepared a Jurisdictional Delineation to address CDFW's comments. The Jurisdictional Delineation determined that jurisdictional waters were not present on the project site, but recommended compliance with the CDFW recommended mitigation measure prior to issuance of any grading permit. The Biological Resources section of the 1S/MND, was revised to include a mitigation measure requiring the applicant to provide proof to the City that the Streambed Alteration Agreement (1602 Agreement) process has been concluded. According to CEQA Section 15073.5(a), recirculation of a negative declaration is required prior to its adoption when it has been substantially revised after public notice of its availability has been given pursuant to Section 15072. Furthermore, CEQA Section 15073.5(b) states, "a "substantial revision" of the negative declaration shall mean: (1) a new avoidable significant effect is identified and mitigation measure or project revisions must be added in order to reduce the effect to insignificance, or (2) the lead agency determines that the proposed mitigation measures or project revisions will not reduce potential effects to less than significance and new measures or revisions must be required." Here, either the CDFW will determine that notification under Section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code is required for the project, or they will require the applicant obtain a Streambed Alteration Agreement. The IS/MND was revised to include a discussion of the Jurisdictional Delineation for the project site and a mitigation measure requiring a Streambed Alteration Agreement was added to the MND and the project conditions of approval. The addition of a condition of approval requiring a Streambed Alteration Agreement is not considered substantial evidence in light of the whole record that cannot be mitigated. Therefore, the Streambed Alteration Agreement mitigation measure is not a substantial revision to the MND, and recirculation of the MND is not required; and b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission recommends the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration; and c. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission recommends the City Council adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project; and d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's recommendation is based is the City Planner of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, P340 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-75 DRC2016-00206 — PACIFIC SUMMIT FOOTHILL, LLC August 23, 2017 Page 4 this Commission hereby recommends approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2016-00206, by amending the General Plan Text, as shown in the attached Exhibits A, B, and C. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF AUGUST 2017. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: ATTEST: Francisco Oaxaca, Chairman Candyc(E rnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 23rd day of August 2017, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, OAXACA, WIMBERLY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MACIAS, MUNOZ ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: NONE General Plan Chapter 2: Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources ft:*4:411.znisoA4,1 fr •. • •• -7-1t• ep, ' 7f -"Ir • 7 fr re;tr,-771710r-'te'!:,?'=17 fS'-'• •—.• This..is „not a • hillside, .condition:,'Grading with, conventional fully •'.) padded lotS'arid terracing is - • „ :t. : Developments with gr,actingis!;'perrpitted. in this tome;but existingi - Iandforms must retain their natural character Padded buildirig sts are Permitted, _hoWeVer,'`;teohMiques such as contour grading and split level architecture ;: or padding for the 'structures only, may be required to rreduce gradin6. When irf'conjunctipnirithth6 teChniFide&describecr.above, and for a project .11%1111141,a master plan which includes special design -features • stiCh, as a :Alf; Op-yrSe*. extensive open &pace, or significant use of - ,green peltS"dr paseos the Planrirng Commission may -Consider the •• use of mass grading techniques adjacent to these Special 'Ciedigli 'featkes as 'partial 'corriplignceWith this standard. t o 0.0 4t:0117 -4 Xqat!ft- 0.att rti q 641 41 L'4,,,42.eig,V:7 Z`:1141:;,..4,1:,..11•C?r,,e): tO,Y;1'11;.t.,• il-#.111.if, ,;.,•,-. Vil., 11.1,1r, k, •r - r • - X *41:0 • 7 ,V,T,fr • ft..7'?Of .• • 'AM.* .1,4•6 EXHIBIT A This is a hillside condition. Special hillside architecturekand 'design • , • . • techniques that 'mihirpizel-greding _are requLred in. this `zone. Architectural prototypes are expected to 'conform; to the natOgl. landfOrm using techniques ,such as level foundations of greaterihdh 18, irchreS„ stem was stacking and clustering: In. conjunction with the alterriA0e;:techniOues:de&cri6ed above and for a!,p1:01.14cf*thirfa master plan wincludes special designfeatuces , such es'a 01f course extensive open space or significant use .of :May consider padded building"sites-adjacent to those,special features when it is foi4rid..that sp.td grading creates a better relatiortship between .that • special designfatqe and the adjacent • ; ' •••• Development Within this zone is limited to no :more'•,than the less VisUalliproninent'slopes, and then only where it.,O-arWbesheWn that safely, environmental and aesthetic impacts can be minimized. Use Of:•;'1erger-,:rdt§•• Verieble',:detbacks'amd variable?4ilcjirig: structural • , techrticOeS iSuCf-C-4S'S*Ped,!•of We; •foundations are epected._ through " .their shape materials colors: Impact -oftraffid and roadways is to be , naturel,doptoUrs,br 66ing:gi-adeTSeparations... This is an -excessive sloPe:cooditiOn'and development is prohibited, unless dirthb foilOidvirkr are' satisfied.: (1) the-pfobertVis located South of Banvari Street; (ii) et•leaStSeventV:five oeicehr(75%) of the kits'or. Par& It !tgat are. the subject �f;the, deVeldprri5ni':6-Or5licbtion .`"te slirburideerbV 16tsor7oareelS improved Xvith strictures; and (iii) the' ' proposedi,:,:pOjeCt is deteiln�d 10",a1OPropriately:- address -slope Stability -and bth4rcieblObiaal_faCtbr of the site; erid-(10'vePetati on for'•- ; • fuel :ThariecierhentlfOr -.wildfire- Protection be achieVed- and niintirwf -,_ • = ' • P341 P342 General Pian Chapter 2: Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources Land Use Goals and Policies Policy LU-B.B: Require that hillside development minimize alteration of natural Iandforms, and encourage clustering where feasible to retain maximum open space. Discussion. The objectives for managing development in hillside areas are to maintain existing slopes, vegetation, wildlife corridors, drainage patterns, knolls, rock outcrops, and ridgelines wherever feasible. Furthermore, the City should avoid development that would result in fire, flooding, landslide, erosion, and other safety hazards. The City seeks hillside development that limits the extent of grading alterations to natural landforms, and provides for innovative design and arrangement of building sites that retain significant natural habitats and features. Clustering is a way of laying out a project whereby the structures are "clustered" together and open space is shared by the residents. Existing slopes, vegetation, wildlife corridors, drainage patterns, knolls, rock outcrops, and ridgelines may be modified only if done in a manner consistent with the City's Hillside Development Ordinance. EXHIBIT B P343 General Plan Chapter 8: Public Health & Safety Public Health and Safety Goals and Policies Policy PS -6.1: Continue enforcement of the Hillside Development Guidelines to allow 'for prudent development and redevelopment of all properties located on slopes greater than 10 percent, and continue to preserve as open space properties located on slopes greater than 30 percent, except as otherwise provided below. Oiscussian: The most effective way to protect lives and property from debris flows and slope instability is to continue to prohibit development on property that exceeds 30 percent in slope, in accordance with current ordinances unless all the following are satisfied: (1) the property is located south of Banyan Street; (ii) at least seventy-five percent (75%) of the lots or parcels that are the subiect of the development application are surrounded by lots or parcels improved with structures; (iii) the proposed protect is determined to appropriately address slope stability and other geological factors of the site; and (iv) vegetation for fuel management for wildfire protection can be achieved and maintained. In addition, property having a natural slope between 10 and 30 percent can be made unstable by development and grading activities. Hillside development guidelines enforce the existing grading standards and require aesthetic treatments that both improve the appearance of the hillsides and preserve the stability of the slopes. These measures include returning slopes to their natural appearance, density reduction, clustering of developments, and steepness after grading. Environmental preservation of the eastern San Gabriel Mountains is also required to reduce debris flow potential. Development of the hillside terrain will only increase the potential for debris flows to damage the City unless the situation is carefully managed. EXHIBIT C P344 RESOLUTION NO. 17-76 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP MODIFICATION NO. 16605M, A REQUEST SUBDIVIDE 24.19 ACRES INTO 6 PARCELS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF 175 ATTACHED CONDOMINIUM UNITS IN THE MIXED USE (MU) DISTRICT LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, BETWEEN RED HILL COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE AND PACIFIC ELECTRIC TRAIL RIGHT-OF-WAY; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, AND 41 AND 0207- 112-09 AND 10. A. Recitals. 1. Pacific Summit -Foothill, LLC, filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map Modification No. SUBTT16605M, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 12th day of April, 2006, the Planning Commission adopted its Resolution No. 06-36, thereby approving Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16605, subject to specific conditions and time limits. 3. The initial approval of SUBTT16605 was for a duration of 3 years, to expire on April 12, 2009. The California State Legislature passed a series of AssemblylSenate Bills automatically extending the approval period of various active tentative maps. SB 1185 extended the approval period 1 -year to April 12, 2010, AB 333 extended the approval period 2 -years to April 12, 2012, AB 208 extended the approval period 2 -years to April 12, 2014, and AB 116 extended the approval period 2 -years to April 12, 2016. 4. On the 23rd day of March, 2016, the Planning Commission adopted its Resolution No. 16-16, thereby approving DRC2015-01110 for a 1 -year Time Extension for SUBTT16605 to expire on April 12, 2017. 5. On the 26th day of April, 2017, the Planning Commission adopted its Resolution No. 17-28, thereby approving DRC2017-00249 for a 1 -year Time Extension for SUBTT16605 to expire on April 12, 2018. 6. On the 9th day of August 2017, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and continued the application to the August 23, 2017 Planning Commission meeting. 7. On the 23rd day of August, 2017, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 8. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Attachment 3 P345 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-76 SUBTT16605M — PACIFIC SUMMIT -FOOTHILL, LLC August 23, 2017 Page 2 B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing on August 23, 2017, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The project site contains approximately 24.19 acres of a generally irregular configuration having a topography with a 30 percent or greater slope, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between Red Hill Country Club Drive and the Pacific Electric Trail, and is presently vacant; and b. The project site is located in the Mixed Use (MU) District; and c. The property to the north contains Condominiums and single-family homes in the Medium (M) Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and Low (L) Residential District (2- 4 dwelling units per acre), the property to the south contains office, commercial, and condominiums uses in the Mixed Use (MU) District and Medium (M) Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre), the property to the east contains Route 66 Trailhead and condominiums in the Medium (M) Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre), the property to the west contains commercial land uses in the Mixed Use (MU) District, and the proposed project surrounds the Sycamore Inn Restaurant in the Mixed Use (MU) District; and d. The application contemplates the subdivision of the subject parcel into six (6) lots for condominium purposes (175 units); and e. The subdivision of the project site conforms to all applicable development standards applicable to property in the Mixed Use (MU) District; and f. The applicant has submitted applications related to the development of the project site including: General Plan Amendment DRC2016-00206, Tentative Tract Modification SUBTT16605M, Design Review DRC2012-00672, Variance DRC2016-00207, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2012-00673 to allow for the subdivision and development of the project site; and g. All lots will have access to a public right-of-way. Access to the project site will be via Foothill Boulevard and will include all public right-of-way improvements including pavement, sidewalk, curb, and gutter on the north side of Foothill Boulevard as well as all right- of-way improvements on interior streets. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans; and P346 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-76 SUBTT16605M — PACIFIC SUMMIT -FOOTHILL, LLC August 23, 2017 Page 3 b. The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans; and c. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and d. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and e. The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; and f. The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. A comment letter was received from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) on July 27, 2017 in response to the circulated IS/MND. The only comment CDFW had was in relation to the possible Jurisdictional Waters on the project site. The applicant and their biologists prepared a Jurisdictional Delineation to address CDFW's comments. The Jurisdictional Delineation determined that jurisdictional waters were not present on the project site, but recommended compliance with the CDFW recommended mitigation measure prior to issuance of any grading permit. The Biological Resources section of the IS/MND, was revised to include a mitigation measure requiring the applicant to provide proof to the City that the Streambed Alteration Agreement (1602 Agreement) process has been concluded. According to CEQA Section 15073.5(a), recirculation of a negative declaration is required prior to its adoption when it has been substantially revised after public notice of its availability has been given pursuant to Section 15072. Furthermore, CEQA Section 15073.5(b) states, "a "substantial revision" of the negative declaration shall mean: (1) a new avoidable significant effect is identified and mitigation measure or project revisions must be added in order to reduce the effect to insignificance, or (2) the lead agency determines that the proposed mitigation measures or project revisions will not reduce potential effects to less than significance and new measures or revisions must be required." Here, either the CDFW will determine that notification under Section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code is required for the project, or they will require the applicant obtain a Streambed Alteration Agreement. The IS/MND was revised to include a discussion of the Jurisdictional Delineation for the project site and a mitigation measure P347 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-76 SUBTT16605M -- PACIFIC SUMMIT -FOOTHILL, LLC August 23, 2017 Page 4 requiring a Streambed Alteration Agreement was added to the MND and the project conditions of approval. The addition of a condition of approval requiring a Streambed Alteration Agreement is not considered substantial evidence in light of the whole record that cannot be mitigated. Therefore, the Streambed Alteration Agreement mitigation measure is not a substantial revision to the MND, and recirculation of the MND is not required; and b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby recommends the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration; and c. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore recommends the City Council adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project; and d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's recommendation is based is the City Planner of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth in the attached Conditions of Approval and the Mitigation Measures listed below and incorporated herein by this reference. Environmental Mitigation Air Quality Short Term (Construction) Emissions 1) During grading activity, all construction equipment (? 150 horsepower) shall be California Air Resources Board (GARB) Tier 3 Certified or better. 2) All clearing, grading, earth -moving, or excavation activities shall cease when winds exceed 25 mph per SCAQMD guidelines in order to limit fugitive dust emissions. 3) The contractor shall ensure that all disturbed unpaved roads and disturbed areas within the Project are watered at least three (3) times daily during dry weather. Watering, with complete coverage of P348 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-76 SUBTT16605M -- PACIFIC SUMMIT -FOOTHILL, LLC August 23, 2017 Page 5 disturbed areas, shall occur at least three times a day, preferably in the midmorning, afternoon, and after work is done for the day. 4) The contractor shall ensure that traffic speeds on unpaved roads and Project site areas are reduced to 15 miles per hour or fess. 5) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 6) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. 7) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 8) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction -grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 9) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 10) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 11) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large area's to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. P349 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-76 SUBTT16605M — PACIFIC SUMMIT -FOOTHILL, LLC August 23, 2017 Page 6 • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (Le., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24 -inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 12) The site shall be treated with water or other soil -stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB)) daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 13) Chemical soil -stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. Long Term Project Operational Impacts 14) Provide adequate ingress and egress at all entrances to public facilities to minimize vehicle idling at curbsides. 15) Provide preferential parking to high occupancy vehicles and shuttle services. 16) Schedule truck deliveries and pickups during off-peak hours, 17) Improve thermal integrity of the buildings and reduce thermal load with automated time clocks or occupant sensors. 18) Landscape with native and/or drought -resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 19) Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planting programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC -01 measure. 20) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 21) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. P350 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-76 SUBTT16605M — PACIFIC SUMMIT -FOOTHILL, LLC August 23, 2017 Page 7 22) All new development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District's Rule 445, Wood Burning Devices. Rule 445 was adopted in March 2008 to reduce emissions of PM2.5 and precludes the installation of indoor or outdoor wood burning devices (i.e. fireplaces/hearths) in new development on or after March 9, 2009. Biological Resources 1) Three days prior to the removal of vegetation or ground -disturbing activities, a breeding bird survey that is in conformance with the Migratory Bird Act shall be required to determine whether nesting is occurring. Occupied nests shall not be disturbed unless a qualified biologist verifies through non-invasive methods that either (a) the adult birds have not begun egg -laying or incubation; or (b) the juveniles from the occupied nests are foraging independently and are capable of independent survival. If the biologist is unable to verify one of the above conditions, then no disturbance shall occur within 300 feet of non -raptor nests, and within 5,000 feet of raptor nests, during the breeding season to avoid abandonment of the young. If nests are discovered, they shall be avoided through the establishment of an appropriate buffer setback, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. The temporary "no construction" area shall be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and have left the nest, construction in the area may resume. 2) Perform a Burrowing Owl Survey that is in conformance with the Department of Fish and Wildlife Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation and submit the written report outlining the findings to the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) and the Planning Department within 30 days of groundbreaking activity. The survey shall include a habitat assessment, survey and impact analysis. The Burrowing Owl Survey shall follow the following protocol: • Burrowing Owl Survey methodology shall be based on Appendix D (Breeding and Non -breeding Season Surveys and Reports) of the CDFW Staff Report. Results of the pre - construction survey shaii be provided to CDFW and the City. If the pre -construction survey does not identify burrowing owls on the project site, then no further mitigation is required. If burrowing owls are found to be utilizing the project site during the pre -construction survey, measures shall be developed by the qualified biologist in coordination with CDFW to avoid Impacting occupied burrows during the nesting period. These measures shall be based on the most current CDFW protocols and will at minimum include establishment of buffer setbacks from occupied burrows and ow! monitoring. If ground -disturbing P351 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-76 SUBTT16605M -- PACIFIC SUMMIT -FOOTHILL, LLC August 23, 2017 Page 8 activities are delayed or suspended for more than 30 days after the pre -construction survey, the site shall be resurveyed for owls. • During the non -breeding season from September 1 through January 31, if burrows are occupied by migratory or non - migratory resident burrowing owls during a pre -construction survey, burrow exclusion and/or closure may be used to exclude owls from those burrows. Burrow exclusion and/or closure should only be conducted by a qualified wildlife biologist in coordination with CDFW using the most current CDFW guidelines. • During the avian nesting season from February 1 through August 31, if nests are discovered, they shall be avoided through establishment of an appropriate buffer setback, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. The temporary "no construction" area would have to be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and have left the nest, construction in the area may resume. 3) Prior to issuance of any grading permit, the Project Applicant shall provide to the City of Rancho Cucamonga either of the following: Written correspondence from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife stating that notification under Section 1602 of the California Fish and Game Code is not required for the project; or a copy of a Department executed Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement, authorizing impacts to California Fish and Game Code, section 1602 resources associated with the project. Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. P352 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-76 SUBTT16605M — PACIFIC SUMMIT -FOOTHILL, LLC August 23, 2017 Page 9 • Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with Section 21083.2 Archaeological resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, including but not limited to, avoiding archaeological sites, capping or covering sites with soil, planning the site as a park or green space or paying an in-kind mitigation fee. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth -disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth -disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. Geology and Soils 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil -stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PK() emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re -planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. P353 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-76 SUBTT16605M — PACIFIC SUMMIT -FOOTHILL, LLC August 23, 2017 Page 10 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM10 emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM10 emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil -stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PK() emissions. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Cumulative Short Term (Construction) GHG Emissions 1) The project must comply with all rules that assist in reducing short- term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAQMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil -stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 2) The construction contractor shall select construction equipment based on low -emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures' specification. 3) Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 minutes. 4) Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline- or diesel -powered engines where feasible. 5) Construction should be timed so as not to interfere with peak -hour traffic. 6) Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be supported and encouraged for the construction crew. Cumulative Long Term (Operational) GHG Emissions 7) Construction and Building materials shall be produced and/or manufactured locally. Use "Green Building Materials" such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low -volatile -organic - compound (VOC) materials. 8) Design all buildings to exceed California Building Code Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of; P354 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-76 SUBTT16605M — PACIFIC SUMMIT -FOOTHILL, LLC August 23, 2017 Page 11 • Increased insulation. • Limit air leakage through the structure. • Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances. • Landscape and develop site utilizing shade, prevailing winds and landscaping. • Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems. • Install light colored "cool" roofs and coo! pavements. • Install solar or light emitting diodes (LED's) for outdoor lighting. 9) Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and include the following; • Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. • Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available and/or install the infrastructure to deliver and use reclaimed water. • Design building to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets, dual flush toilets and waterless urinals/water heaters. • Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non- vegetated surfaces. 10) Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educate employees about reducing waste and about recycling. Hydrology and Water Quality Construction Activities 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. P355 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-76 SUBTT16605M -- PACIFIC SUMMIT -FOOTHILL, LLC August 23, 2017 Page 12 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 5) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Post -Construction Operational 6) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non- structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 7) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. P356 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-76 SUBTT16605M — PACIFIC SUMMIT -FOOTHILL, LLC August 23, 2017 Page 13 8) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non- structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 9) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. 10) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the WQMP (David Evans and Associates, April 2017) to reduce construction pollutants from entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. Noise Exterior 1) Prior to the issuance of any grading plans a construction -related noise mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. The Plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction. 2) During all project site excavation and grading, the project contractors shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers consistent with the manufacturers' standards. 3) The project contractor shall place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors nearest the project site. 4) The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction -related noise sources and noise -sensitive receptors nearest the project site during all project construction. P357 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-76 SUBTT16605M — PACIFIC SUMMIT -FOOTHILL, LLC August 23, 2017 Page 14 5) The construction contractor shall obtain the City's approval for its haul plan, with the planned haul truck routes avoiding residential areas to the extent feasible. 6) The construction contractor shall change the timing and/or sequence of the noisiest construction operations to avoid sensitive times of the day. 7) Prior to the issuance of any grading plans, the applicant shall submit a construction -related noise mitigation plan for Planning Director review and approval. This plan shall depict the location of construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction of the project. 8) During construction, the contractor shall ensure all construction equipment is equipped with appropriate noise attenuating devices. 9) Idling equipment shall be turned off when not in use. 10) Equipment shall be maintained so that vehicles and their loads are secured from rattling and banging. 11) In order to meet the 65 CNEL exterior noise standard, noise barriers ranging from 4 to 5.5 feet (Noise Analysis, Mestre Greve Associates, July 2015, Exhibit 3) will be required along Foothill Boulevard. The noise barriers may consist of a wall, berm, or combination of the two. The noise barriers must have a surface density of at least 3.5 pounds per square foot, and shall have no openings or gaps. The wall may be constructed of stud and stucco, 3/8 -inch plate glass, or 5/8 -inch Plexiglas, any masonry material, or a combination of these materials. The first floor exterior living areas are projected to meet the 65 CNEL outdoor noise standard with the specified noise barriers. The walls shall be located at the top of slope. Interior 12) For proper acoustical performance, all exterior windows and doors, and sliding glass doors must have a positive seal and leaks/cracks must be kept to a minimum. 13) To prevent sound leaks the following shall be provided: On concrete slab, the first layer of 5/8" gypsum board on the unit side should be sealed top and bottom with resilient caulk, as well as around the junction boxes. • Window rough -in seams should be no greater than W, and all seams should be caulked with resilient caulking. • Seal, caulk, gasket or weather-strip all joints and seams to P358 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-76 SUBTT16605M — PACIFIC SUMMIT -FOOTHILL, LLC August 23, 2017 Page 15 eliminate air leakage through these assemblies. Includes around window and doorframes, at penetrations through walls, and ail other openings in the building envelope. 14) All first -floor rooms are projected to meet the 45 CNEL interior noise standard through the installation of the exterior noise barriers along Foothill Boulevard. All rooms, including second and third floor units, are projected to meet the 45 CNEL interior noise standard without building upgrades. 15) All buildings exposed to noise levels greater than 57 CNEL will meet the 45 CNEL interior noise standard only with windows closed. Adequate ventilation, with windows closed, will be required for those units adjacent to Foothill Boulevard (Noise Analysis, Mestre Greve Associates, July 2015, Exhibit 4). 16) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 17) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050, Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted, 18) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes and include appropriate noise mitigation measures. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. Tribal Cultural Resources 1) The applicant shall contact the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation (GBMI-KN) and the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians (SMBM1) to discuss Tribal Monitoring of the project during al! ground disturbing activities, and any trenching below the initial grade level, to ensure that cultural resources that may be encountered during ground disturbances are protected and preserved for study. The P359 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-76 SUBTT16605M -- PACIFIC SUMMIT -FOOTHILL, LLC August 23, 2017 Page 16 monitor(s) must be approved by the Tribal Representatives and will be present on-site during ground disturbing activities. The Native American Monitor(s) will complete monitoring logs on a daily basis. The logs will provide descriptions of the daily activities, including construction activities, locations, soil, and any cultural materials identified. In addition, the monitor(s) will be required to provide insurance certificates, including liability insurance, for any archaeological resource(s) encountered during grading and excavation activities pertinent to the provisions outlined in the California Environmental Quality Act, California Public Resources Code Division 13, and Section 21083.2 (a) through (k). The on-site monitoring shall end when the project site grading and excavation activities are completed, or when the Tribal Representatives and monitor have indicated that the site has a low potential for archeological resources. The applicant shall submit the results of these consultations to the City prior to issuance of grading permits for the project site. 2) In the event that human remains or funerary objects are encountered during any activities associated with the project, work in the immediate vicinity (within a 100 -foot buffer of the find) shall cease and the County Coroner shall be contacted pursuant to State Health and Safety Code §7050.5, and that code shall be enforced for the duration of the project. Prior to the start of ground disturbing activities, the land owner shall arrange a designated site location within the footprint of the project for the respectful reburial of the human remains and/or ceremonial objects. Any discoveries of human skeletal material shall be immediately reported to the County Coroner. The monitor will then notify the Qualified Archaeologist and the construction manager who will call the coroner. Work will continue to be diverted while the coroner determines whether the remains are Native American. The discovery is to be kept confidential and secure to prevent any further disturbance. If Native American, the coroner will notify the NAHC as mandated by state law who will then appoint a Most Likely Descendent. In the case where discovered human remains cannot be fully documented and recovered on the same day, the remains will be covered with muslin cloth and a steel plate that can be moved by heavy equipment placed over the excavation opening to protect the remains. If this type of steel plate is not available, a 24-hour guard should be posted outside of working hours. The Tribe(s) will make every effort to recommend diverting the project and keeping the remains in situ and protected. If the project cannot be diverted, it may be determined that burials will be removed. The Tribe(s) will work closely with the Qualified Archaeologist to ensure that the excavation is treated carefully, ethically, and respectfully. If data recovery is approved by the Tribe(s), documentation shall be taken which includes at a minimum detailed descriptive notes and sketches. Additional types of documentation shall be approved by the Tribe(s) P360 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-76 SUBTT16605M — PACIFIC SUMMIT -FOOTHILL, LLC August 23, 2017 Page 17 for data recovery purposes. Cremations will either be removed in bulk or by means as necessary to ensure completely recovery of all material. If the discovery of human remains includes 4 or more burials, the location is considered a cemetery and a separate treatment plan shall be created. The project applicant shall consult with the Tribe(s) regarding avoidance of ail cemetery sites. Once complete, a final report of all activities is to be submitted to the NAHC. The Tribe(s) do NOT authorize any scientific study or the utilization of any invasive diagnostics on human remains. 3) In the event that Native American cultural resources are discovered during project activities, all work in the immediate vicinity of the find (within a 60 -foot buffer) shall cease and a qualified archaeologist meeting Secretary of interior standards shall be hired to assess the find. Work on the other portions of the project outside of the buffered area may continue during this assessment period. The archaeologist shall contact the GBMI-KN and the SMBMI for input regarding the preservation, retention and final disposition of any discovered cultural resources. The archaeologist shall prepare a mitigation plan and technical resources management report, which shall document the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Additionally, the GBM! -KN and the SMBMI will be contacted if any such find occurs and be provided information and permitted/invited to perform a site visit when the archaeologist makes his/her assessment, so as to provide Tribal input. All archaeological resources unearthed by project construction activities shall be evaluated by the Qualified Archaeologist and Native Monitor. If the resources are Native American in origin, the Tribe(s) shall coordinate with the landowner regarding treatment and curation of these resources. Typically, the Tribe(s) will request reburial or preservation for educational purposes. If a resource is determined by the Qualified Archaeologist to constitute a "historical resource" pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(a) or has a "unique archaeological resource" pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21083.2(g), the Qualified Archaeologist shall coordinate with the applicant and the City to develop a formal treatment plan that would serve to reduce impacts to the resources. The treatment plan established for the resources shall be in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(0 for historical resources and Public Resources Code Sections 21083.2(b) for unique archaeological resources. Preservation in place (i.e., avoidance) is the preferred manner of treatment. If preservation in place is not feasible, treatment may include implementation of archaeological data recovery excavations to remove the resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and analysis. Any historic archaeological material that is not Native American in origin shall be curated at a public, non-profit institution with a research interest in the materials, such as the San Bernardino County Museum, if such an institution agrees to accept the material. If no institution accepts the P361 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-76 SU8TT16605M — PACIFIC SUMMIT -FOOTHILL, LLC August 23, 2017 Page 18 archaeological material, they shall be donated to a local school or historical society in the area for educational purposes. 4) In the event that significant Native American historical resources, as defined by CEQA (as amended, 2015), are discovered and avoidance cannot be ensured, an SOI -qualified archaeologist shall be retained to develop a cultural resources Treatment Plan, as well as a Discovery and Monitoring Plan, the drafts of which shall be provided to the GBMI-KN and the SMBMI for review and comment. All in -field investigations, assessments, and/or data recovery enacted pursuant to the finalized Treatment Plan shall be monitored by a GBMI-KN and SMBMI Tribal Participant(s). The Lead Agency and/or applicant shall, in good faith, consult with GBMI-KN and the SMBMI on the disposition and treatment of any artifacts or other cultural materials encountered during the project. 5) Non -Native American artifacts shall be inventoried, assessed, and analyzed for cultural affiliation, personal affiliation (prior ownership), function, and temporal placement. Subsequent to analysis and reporting, these artifacts shall be subjected to curation or returned to the Property Owner/Developer, as deemed appropriate. Once ground -altering activities have ceased or the Project Archaeologist determines that monitoring activities are no longer necessary, monitoring activities may be discontinued following notification to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23 DAY OF AUGUST 2017. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: FFrancisco Oaxaca, Chairman ATTEST: Cancly:e Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 23rd day of August 2017, by the following vote -to -wit: P362 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-76 SUBTT16605M — PACIFIC SUMMIT -FOOTHILL, LLC August 23, 2017 Page 19 AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, OAXACA, WIMBERLY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:.MACIAS, MUNOZ ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: NONE Project #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: Conditions of Approval Community Development Department SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 P363 Sycamore Heights APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10 Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Variance, and Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Approval is for the subdivision of 24.19 acres into 6 parcels and for the development of 175 attached condominium units in the Mixed Use (MU) District located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between Red Hill Country Club Drive and Pacific Electric Trail Right -of -Way 2. Provide additional parking spaces in the vicinity of the Live/Work units to ensure adequate parking is available for commercial uses. 3. Provide a pedestrian connection to the Pacific Electric Trail along the east side of the project site, subject to approval by the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA). 4. Provide additional landscaping adjacent to the project perimeter wall to the northwest of the Sycamore Inn. 5. For slope planting south of the existing residences along the project's north boundary utilize a tree species and spacing that protects the views of homeowners living north of the project site. Standard Conditions of Approval 6. For all residential development, provide conduit from each unit/lot and a pull box to connect to the street. Provide interior structured wiring for each house/building with minimum Category 5 copper wire, Radio Grade 6 coaxial cable, and a central distribution panel, prior to release of occupancy (fiber -to -the building, FTTB). Plans shall be submitted for Planning Department and Building Official review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. 7. All dwellings shall have the front. side and rear elevations upgraded with architectural treatment, detailing and increased delineation of surface treatment subject to Planning Department review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. 8. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections shall be screened from all sides and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent properties and streets. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Department. Any roof -mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically more than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet, shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent nature with the building design and is detailed consistent with the building. Any roof -mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically less than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet shall be painted consistent with the color scheme of the building. Details shall be included in building plans. Printed 8723/2017 www,CityofRC.us Project #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 P364 Sycamore Heights APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10 Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Variance, and Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 9. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Department in the amount of $767 prior to the issuance of Building Permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. 10. In those instances requiring long term monitoring (i.e. beyond final certificate of occupancy), the applicant shall provide a written monitoring and reporting program to the Planning Department prior to issuance of Building Permits. Said program shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. 11. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the City Adopted Special Studies Zone for the Red Hill Fault, in a standard format as determined by the Planning Department, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 12. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 13. Approval of Tentative Tract SUBTT16605 Modification is granted subject to the approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2016-00206, Design Review DRC2012-00672, Variance DRC2016-00207, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2012-00673. 14. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolutions of Approval, Conditions of Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). This includes Planning Commission Resolution No.'s 17-76 (for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16606M), 17-77 (for Design Review DRC2012-00672), 17-78 (for Variance DRC2016-00207), and 17-79 (for Tree Removal Permit DRC2012-00673). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. . 15. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption and Mitigated Negative Declaration fee in the amount of $2,266.25. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing. .16. Tentative Tract 16605 Modification shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the Engineering Services Department within 3 years from the date of the approval. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 8/23/2017 Page 2 of 20 Project #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 P365 Sycamore Heights APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10 Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Variance, and Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 17. For mufti -family residential, property owners are responsible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. 18. Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in accordance with the Development Code Section 17.80.050, and so noted on the grading plans. The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans. The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods. 19. Front yard and corner side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be required per the Development Code. This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting. 20. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Department review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. For development occurring in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, the landscape plans will also be reviewed by Fire Construction Services. 21. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 22. All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than 2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 23. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15 -gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1 -gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5 -gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation .system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy: 24. Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees, meandering sidewalks, and intensified landscaping, is required along Foothill Boulevard. 25. Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for Planning Department review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. These criteria shall encourage the natural growth characteristics of the selected tree species. 26. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water efficient landscaping per Development Code Chapter 17.82. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 8/23/2017 Page 3 of 20 Project #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 P366 Sycamore Heights APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10 Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Variance, and Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 27. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes. Multi -family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to Planning Department review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 28. All units shall be provided with garage door openers if driveways are less than 18 feet in depth from back of sidewalk. 29. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet. 30. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 17 feet long with a required 1 -foot overhang (e.g., over a curb stop). Parallel parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 24 feet long. 31. Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the Planning Department, City Engineer, and Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. For residential development, private gated entrances shall provide adequate turn -around space in front of the gate and a separate visitor lane with call box to avoid cars stacking into the public right-of-way. 32. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. 33. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/plazas/ recreational uses. 34. Access gates to the rear yards shall be constructed from a material more durable than wood gates . Acceptable materials include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC. 35. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 36. Construct block walls between homes (i.e., along interior side and rear property lines), rather than wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency. 37. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination and in conformance with Building and Safety Services Department standards, the Municipal Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department (RCFD) Standards. .38. The site shall be developed and maintained in 'accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and Development Code regulations. 39. All ground -mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. www.CityotRC.us Printed: 8)23/2017 Page 4 of 20 Project #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, 0RC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 P367 Sycamore Heights APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10 Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Variance, and Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 40. A uniform hardscape and street furniture design including seating benches, trash receptacles, free-standing potted plants, bike racks, light bollards, etc., shall be utilized and be compatible with the architectural style. Detailed designs shall be submitted for Planning Department review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 41. On corner side yards, provide minimum 5 -foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk. The 5 -foot wall/fence setback and the parkway shall have landscape and irrigation in addition to the required street trees. Detailed landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning Department review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. The parkway landscaping including trees, shrubs, ground covers and irrigation shall be maintained by the property owner. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the parkway maintenance requirement, in a standard format as determined by the Planning Department, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 42. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance. shall be submitted for Planning Department and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 43. For multiple -family development, laundry facilities shall be provided as required by the Development Code. 44. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department and Police Department (909-477-2800) prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 45. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Services Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance and final acceptance granted prior to occupancy. 46. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 47. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Department. 48. Revised Site Plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Planning Department review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 49. Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock. Other stone veneers may be manufactured products. 50. Street names shall be submitted for Planning Department review and approval in accordance with the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map Printed; 812312017 Page 5 of 20 www.CityofRC.us Project #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00201, and DRC2012-00673 P368 Sycamore Heights APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10 Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Variance, and Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 51. If no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units with all receptacles shielded from public view. 52. Any approval for Design Review DRC2012-00672, Variance DRC2016-00207, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2012-00673 shall expire if Building Permits are not issued within 5 years from the date of approval, or a time extension has been granted. 53. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Services Department. 54. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building. 55. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Services Department. 56. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions shall restrict the storage of recreational vehicles on this site unless they are the principal source of transportation for the owner and prohibit parking on interior circulation aisles other than in designated visitor parking areas. 57. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Services Department and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer. The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Department a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes. 58. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all Tots for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. 59. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owners at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/fences along the project perimeter. 60. Slope fencing along side property lines may be wrought iron or black plastic coated chain link to maintain an open feeling and enhance views. Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions wvvw.CityofRC,us Printed: 8/23/2017 Page 6 of 20 Project #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: SUB T T16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-0067 3 P369 Sycamore Heights APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10 Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Variance, and Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: EncJineeriing Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Foothill Boulevard shall be improved in accordance with the City's "Major Divided Arterial" standards along the entire project frontage. a. Parkway improvements, including special streetlights, street trees and sidewalk, shall conform to the Foothill Boulevard District guidelines outlined in the Development Code and the Route 66/Foothill Boulevard Visual improvement Plan. b. Complete parkway improvements on the north side between the Pacific Electric Trail bridge and the adjacent Sycamore Inn property. City has already installed the curb and gutter. Add parkway improvements including sidewalk, street trees, streetlights and curbside drain outlets, per Standard Drawing 107-B or 107-0 as needed. c. Right turn lane, per Standard Drawing 119 (Bus Bay -Right Turn Lane option), shall be at least 150 feet in length with a 60 -foot transition. The right turn lane shall be based off existing Foothill Boulevard elevations. d. Provide an interim physical barrier (at the project entrance) to left turns to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. e. Provide 8,600 Lumen LED streetlights. The street lights shall be owned by the City. Developer shall be responsible to coordinate and pay all costs to provide SCE power on City owned street lights. Coordinate with City staff for design and installation requirements. f. Foothill drive approach shall have a 20 -foot radius for the inbound right turn and a least a 31 -foot radius for the outbound right turn, with sidewalk crossing the approach close to perpendicular at the zero curb face. Right-of-way dedication shall encompass the full public sidewalk crossing. Driveway median and accent paving shall not extend into the public right-of-way. g. Entry gates shall conform to the City's Residential Project Gated Entrance design guideline. h. Provide traffic signage and striping as required including northbound and southbound left turn and through movement time restrictions on Red Hill Country Club Drive at Foothill Boulevard during the peak hours. i. Construct access ramps at the street type entrance on Foothill Boulevard to comply with current ADA requirements. A detail will have to be added to the street improvement plan showing the design details, elevations, and grades of the access ramp to substantiate they comply with current ADA requirements. www,CityofRC.us Printed: 8/23/2017 Page 7 of 20 Project #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, arid DRC2012-00673 P370 Sycamore Heights APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10 Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Variance, and Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 2. Provide the fair share contribution for the Year 2035 as stated in the project traffic impact study for Foothill Boulevard at San Bernardino Road. Ultimate improvements include construction of a 3rd westbound and a 3rd eastbound through lane, restriping the northbound shared left turn/through lane into a shared left turn/through/right turn lane and modifications to the traffic signal. 3. Make a in -lieu contribution for a prorated share of the cost of the future improvements along the project frontage, to the future centerline of Foothill Boulevard. Final construction cost estimate to be approved by the City Engineer. 4. Red Hill Country Club Drive shall be improved in accordance with the City's "Local Street" standards along the project frontage. a. Provide curb and gutter, asphalt pavement, sidewalk, street trees and a drive approach for emergency vehicle access on the east side of the existing street. b. Drive approach for emergency vehicle access on Red Hill Country Club Drive shall be installed per Standard Drawing 105-C, with thicker concrete or reinforced sidewalk to meet Fire District standards. c. Provide a minimum 6 -foot curb adjacent sidewalk width. Install retaining walls as needed. d. Provide 5800 Lumen HPSV-equivalent LED streetlights along the frontage. The street lights shall be owned by the City. Developer shall be responsible to coordinate and pay all costs to provide SCE power on City owned street lights. Coordinate with City staff for design and installation requirements. e. Provide traffic signage and striping as required. 5. Parkways shall slope at 2 percent from 1 foot behind the sidewalk to the top of the curb, along all street frontages. 6. Dedicate Lots A, B and C from the approved Tentative Map to the City. 7. Provide a copy of the on-site landscaping plans for Engineering Services Department review regarding conformance with Foothill Boulevard beautification master plan. 8. Add the following note to any private landscape plans that show street trees; "All improvements within the public right-of-way, including street trees, shall be installed per the public improvement plans". If there is a discrepancy between the public and private plans, the street improvement plans will govern. www.CityofRC,us Printed: 8123/2017 Page 8 of 20 Project #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: SUBTT16605M, 0RC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 P371 Sycamore. Heights APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10 Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Variance, and Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 9. Extend Master Plan Storm Drain Line III -1 from Foothill Boulevard to Red Hill Country Club Drive. The applicant shall submit a detailed hydrology study to engineering and said study shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of a Building Permit, whichever occurs first. Said study shall include the existing, interim and the ultimate proposed hydrologic conditions including key elevations, drainage patterns and proposed locations and sizes of all existing and proposed drainage devices. The hydrology study shall present a full breakdown of all the runoff generated on- and off-site. If there are any impacts to the downstream channel, the City will require full installation of the Master Plan Storm Drain culvert, south of Foothill Boulevard, along with any right-of-way acquisition and easements that may be required. Standard drainage fees for the site shall be credited to the cost of permanent master plan facilities, in accordance with City Policy. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover over sizing costs, in excess of fees from future development within the same tributary area. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within six months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. a. Construct private, on-site storm drains to collect all project runoff, and discharges from adjacent properties to the north and convey to the MasterPlan Storm Drain. b. Provide manholes at public-private junctions. 10. Maintenance access shall be granted to the City for the on-site portion of the master plan storm drain. All manholes shall be easily accessible. 11. Private drainage facilities shall prevent developed flows from entering the Pacific Electric Trail right-of-way. Existing inlet facilities for culverts in the SBCTA right-of-way shall be protected. Final drainage study shalt address whether those culverts can be used for runoff from perimeter slopes or undeveloped portions of the project site. Also, surface drainage shall not flow over City right-of-way or maintained areas. Provide intercept of surface drainage such as by use of v -gutters and provide for drainage to enter street through parkway culverts. 12. The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) fronting the project site shall be removed or placed underground, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. All services crossing Foothill Boulevard and/or Red Hill Country Club Drive shall be undergrounded at the same time. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development (or redevelopment) as it occurs on the opposite side of the street. ]f the developer fails to submit said reimbursement agreement within six months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. a. All existing overhead utilities located on site shall be removed or placed underground. www.cityofRC.us Printed; W23/2017 Page 9 of 20 Project #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, 0RC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 P372 Sycamore Heights APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10 Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Variance, and Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 13. It shall be the developer's responsibility to have the current FIRM Zone A designation removed from the project area. The developer shall provide drainage/or flood protection facilities sufficient to obtain an unshaded "X" designation. The developer's engineer shall prepare all necessary reports, plans, hydrologic/hydraulic calculations. A Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) shall be required prior to grading permits. A Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) shall be issued by FEMA prior to certificate of occupancy. 14. Master Plan Storm Drain Line III -1 shall be constructed and aligned so that it remains within the developer's property before connecting into the existing storm drain in the Foothill Boulevard right-of-way. A permanent storm drain easement shall be granted to the City for the public storm drain lines within the developer's property prior to acceptance of the improvements. As an alternative option to constructing the storm drain line and securing easements within the developer's property, at its sole cost and expense, the developer may voluntarily obtain a perpetual easement through the property located at 8318 Foothill Boulevard (Sycamore Inn) for such storm drain lines. Should the developer not obtain the necessary easement prior to the filing of the final map with the City, this alternative option shall be void and the developer shall construct the storm drain lines exclusively within the developer's property. Standard Conditions of Approval 15. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 16. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. www•CityafRC.us Printed: 8/23/2017 Page 10 of 20 Project t: Project Name: Location: Project Type: SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 P373 Sycamore Heights APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10 Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Variance, and Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 17. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3 -inch pvc with pull rope or as specified. e. The proposed development is slated to be included in the City's Fiber Optic / Broadband service business plan that would provide a City owned Fiber -to -the -Premise (FTTP) infrastructure. Proposed fiber optic conduits and vaults will be placed underground within a duct and structure system to be installed by the Master Developer per Standard Drawing 135-137. The size, placement and location of the conduit and vaults shall be shown on the Street Improvement and/or Public Improvement Plans and subject to the Engineering Services Department's review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or final map approval, whichever comes first. f. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per latest ADA standards or as directed by the City Engineer. g. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. h. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards. i. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to submittal for first plan check. 18. Street trees, a minimum of 15 -gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. www.CltyofRC.us Printed: a/23/2017 Page 11 of 20 Project #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, 0RC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 P374 Sycamore Heights APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10 Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Variance, and Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 19.1nstall street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet — (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Foothill Boulevard in ROW and Median Botanical Name - Prunus blireina Common Name - N.C.N. Min. Grow Space - 3' Spacing - 20' 0.C. Size - 15 gallon Foothill Boulevard On-site Botanical Name - Platanus acerifolia Common Name - London Plane Tree Min. Grow Space - 7' Spacing - 40' 0.0. Size - 15 gallon Red Hill Country Club Drive Botanical Name - Platanus acerifolia Common Name - London Plane Tree Min. Grow Space - 7' Spacing - 40' O.C. Size - 15 gallon Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 20. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. 21. Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective Beautification Master Plan: Foothill Boulevard www.CityofRC.us Printed: 8/23/2017 Page 12 of 20 Project #: SUB T T 16605M, DRC2O12-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 P375 Project Name: Sycamore Heights Location: APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Variance, and Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 22. Provide separate utility services to each building including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 23. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 24. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 25. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. 26. Permits shall be obtained from the following agencies for work within their right of way: San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA) 27. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Permits issued on or after June 2, 2014, must complete the reimbursement process through the City's Accelerate online portal within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project or the deposit will be forfeited. Permits issued before June 2, 2014, require the following when applying for a deposit reimbursement: a completed CD -2 form, a copy of the cashier's receipt showing the deposit amount, and all weight tickets. Instructions and forms are available at the City's web site, www.CityofRC.us, under City Hall; Engineering; Environmental Programs. 28. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval. 29. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. 30. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline): 60 total feet on Foothill Boulevard 30 total feet on Red Hill Country Club Drive 31. All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be quit -claimed or delineated on the final map. 32. Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum of 7 feet measured from the face of curbs to the right-of-way. 33. Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk. Printed: 8/23/2017 Page 13 of 20 www.CityofRC,us Project #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 P376 Sycamore Heights APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10 Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Variance, and Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 34. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all common roads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to, or concurrent with the final map. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout "Information for Grading Plans and Permit". 2. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code and/or the California Residential Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices . The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 3. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 4. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 5. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 6. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. 7. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. All dust control sign (s) shall be located outside of the public right of way. 8. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, the rough grading plan shall be a separate plan submittal and permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 9. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall(s) on property line(s) or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 10. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show the ,accessibility path from the public right of way and the accessibility parking stalls to the building doors in conformance with the current adopted California Building Code. All accessibility ramps shall show sufficient detail including gradients, elevations, and dimensions and comply with the current adopted California Building Code. Printed: 8/23/2017 Page 14 of 20 www.CityafRC.us Project #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: SUBTT16605iM, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 P377 Sycamore Heights APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10 Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Variance, and Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 11. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on-site construction where possible, and shall provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 12. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the grading plan shall show that all manufactured slopes shall be a minimum 2 -foot offset from the public right of way, permitted line, or the adjacent private property. All slope offsets shall meet the requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 13. Prior to the issuance of a grading plan for multi -family projects, the private streets and drive aisles within multi -family developments shall include street plans as part of the Grading and Drainage Plan set. The private street plan view shall show typical street sections. The private street profile view shall show the private street/drive aisle centerline. 14. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the grading and drainage plan shall show the maximum parking stall gradient at 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code. 15. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 16. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100 -feet beyond project boundary. 17. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 18. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre -grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre -grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: 1) The bottom of the over -excavation; i!) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shalt submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 19. All roof drainage flowing to the public right of way (Foothill Boulevard) must drain under the sidewalk through a parkway culvert approved by the Engineering Department. This shall be shown on both the grading and drainage plan and Engineering Services Department required plans. Ffinted. 8/23/2017 Page 15 of 20 www.CityofRC.us Project #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: SUB T T16r05M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 P378 Sycamore Heights APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10 Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Variance, and Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 20. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the permitted grading plan (or architectural site plan) set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC1804.31CRC R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.21CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted California Building Code/Residential Code. 21. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall obtain a signed and notarized letter from the adjacent property owner(s) for ALL work proposed on the adjacent property. The letter shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set. The letter shall show on either the title sheet or a detail sheet of the grading and drainage plan set. 22. Prior to approval of the project -specific storm water quality management plan, the applicant shall submit to the Building Official, or his designee, a precise grading plan showing the location and elevations of existing topographical features, and showing the location and proposed elevations of proposed structures and drainage of the site. 23. A drainage study showing a 100 -year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. The report shall contain water surface profile gradient calculations for all storm drain pipes 12 -inches and larger in diameter. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. In addition, the project specific drainage study shall provide inlet calculations showing the proper sizing of the water quality management plan storm water flows into the proposed structural storm water treatment devices. 24. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 25. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage acceptance easements(s) from adjacent downstream property owner(s) or discharge flows in a natural condition (concentrated flows are not accepted) and shall provide the Building and Safety Official a drainage study showing the proposed flows do not exceed the existing flows prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. 26. Roof water is not permitted to flow over the public parkway and shall be directed to an under parkway culvert per City of Rancho Cucamonga requirements prior to issuance of a grading permit. 27. Flow lines steeper than 6 percent could be erosive. The applicant shall provide hard lined gutters and swales where concentrated flows exceed 3fps, and anywhere that flow lines exceed 10 percent. This shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan prior to issuance of a grading permit. Printed: 8/23/2017 rw W.CityofRC.us Page 16 of 20 Project #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: Sl1BTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 P379 Sycamore Heights APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10 Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Variance, and Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 28. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall demonstrate that the storm water run-off will not adversely affect the downstream properties and that the water may legally discharge to the downstream properties. The engineer of record shall show on the final permitted grading and drainage plan one (1) or more of the following items are met: a) There is sufficient downstream capacity to accept the proposed storm water flows and that the downstream property owner have provided permission to accept the upstream storm water flows; b) a legal document/entity exists allowing developed storm water flows to be discharged to the property lower in elevation; c) a storm drain system to safely convey the storm water flows to a public storm drain system without causing flooding to adjacent property(ies). 29. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the latest adopted California Plumbing Code. Private storm drain improvements shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan. 30. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy or final sign off by the Building Inspector the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) storm water treatment devices and best management practices (BMP). 31. Prior to approval of the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), the WQMP shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 32. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment devices and best management practices (BMP) as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan, shall be provided for by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the approval of the Water Quality Management Plan. Said CC&R's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. 33. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the grading and drainage plan shall show concrete drainage swales at the toe of slopes and discharge the water to an approved drainage facility. 34. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 35. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID). The WDID number shall also be shown on the WQMP Site and Drainage Plan document. 36. The applicant shall provide a copy of a completed EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) for each underground infiltration device, with the Facility ID Number assigned, to the Building and Safety Services Department Official prior to issuance of the Grading Permit and/or approval of the project -specific Water Quality Management Plan. A copy of EPA Form 7520-16 shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set, and a copy of said form shall be included in the project -specific Water Quality Management Plan. Printed: 8123/2017 Page 17 of 20 www.CityofRC.us Project #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 P380 Sycamore Heights APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10 Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Variance, and Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 37. The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for the Class V Injection Wells/underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 38. The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the structural storm water treatment devices, commonly referred to as BMPs, to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 39. The land/property owner shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a biennial basis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. 40. A final project -specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be approved by the Building and Safety Director, or his designee, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit or any building permit. 41. Prior to the start of landscaping operations, the landscape architect and the landscape contractor shall provide a sample of the weed fabric barrier to the Project Planner, City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The weed barrier shall be permeable. 42. The final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP) shall include executed maintenance agreements along with the maintenance guidelines for all proprietary structural storm water treatment devices (BMP's). In the event the applicant cannot get the proprietary device maintenance agreements executed prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant is required to submit a letter to be included within the WQMP document, and scanned and pasted onto the Site and Drainage Plan which states that prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy with applicant shall enter into a contract for the maintenance of the proprietary storm water treatment device. If the proprietary storm water treatment device is part of a residential subdivision, prior to the sale of the residential lot, the developer shall include maintenance agreement(s) as part of the sale of the residential lot to the buyer. A copy of the maintenance agreements to be included in the sale of the property shall be included within the WQMP document. 43. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the project specific water quality management plan all private storm water catch basin inlets shall include insert filters to capture those pollutants of concern as addressed in the in the final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP). At a minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris. All catch basin insert filters shall be maintained on a regular basis as described in the "Inspection and Maintenance Responsibility for Post Construction BMP" section of the final project -specific water quality management plan. Printed; 8123/21717 Page 18 of 20 www.CityofRC.us Project #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: SUBTT166OSM, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 P381 Sycamore Heights APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10 Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Variance, and Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 44. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project -Specific Water Quality Management Plan shall include a completed copy of "Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet" located in Appendix D "Section VII — Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and 'Factor of Safety Recommendations, ..." of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans. The infiltration study shall include the Soil Engineer's recommendations for Appendix D, Table VI1.3: Suitability Assessment Related Considerations for Infiltration Facility Safety Factors". 45. Prior to approval of the final project -specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project -specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". 46. The subject project, shall accept all existing off-site storm water drainage flows and safely convey those flows through or around the project site. If existing off-site storm water drainage flows mix with any on-site storm water drainage flows, then the off-site storm water drainage flows shall be treated with the on-site storm water drainage flows for storm water quality purposes, prior to discharging the storm water drainage flows from the project site. 47. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the Building Official, or his designee, the civil engineer of record shall file a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Post Construction Storm Water Treatment Devices As -Built Certificate with the Environmental Programs Coordinator, City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Services Department. 48. As the use of drywells are proposed for the structural storm water treatment device, to meet the infiltration requirements of the current Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Systems (MS4) Permit, adequate source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration shall be evaluated prior to infiltration and discussed in the final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan document. Printed: 8123/2017 www.CityofRC.us Page 19 of 20 Proj`ect #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: SuBTT16605M, uRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 P382 Sycamore Heights APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10 Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Variance, and Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 49. GROUND WATER PROTECTION: Prior to approval of the final project specific water quality management plan (WQMP), the WQMP document shall meet the requirements of the State Water Resources Control Board Order No. R8-2010-0036 (NPDES No. CAS 618036), the San Bernardino County Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Separation (MS4) Permit reads: Section XI.D(Water Quality Management Plan Requirements).8(Groundwater Protection): Treatment Control BMPs utilizing infiltration [exclusive of incidental infiltration and BMPs not designed to primarily function as infiltration devices (such as grassy swales, detention basins, vegetated buffer strips, constructed wetlands, etc.)] must comply with the following minimum requirements to protect groundwater: a. Use of structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause or contribute to an exceedance of ground water quality objectives. b. Source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration should be evaluated prior to infiltration. c. Adequate pretreatment of runoff prior to infiltration shall be required in gas stations and large commercial parking lots. (NOTE: The State Water Quality Control Board defines a large commercial parking lot as `100,000 sq. ft. or more of commercial development to include parking lot (with 100 or more vehicle traffics), OR, by means of 5,000sgft or more of allowable space designated for parking purposes'). d. Unless adequate pre-treatment of runoff is provided prior to infiltration structural infiltration treatment BMPs must not be used for areas of industrial or light industrial activity{77}, areas subject to high vehicular traffic (25,000 or more daily traffic); car washes; fleet storage areas; nurseries; or any other high threat to water quality land uses or activities. e. Class V injection wells or dry wells must not be placed in areas subject to vehicular{78} repair or maintenance activities{79}, such as an auto body repair shop, automotive repair shop, new and used car dealership, specialty repair shop (e.g., transmission and muffler repair shop) or any facility that does any vehicular repair work. f. Structural infiltration BMP treatment shall not be used at sites that are known to have soil and groundwater contamination. g. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall be located at least 100 feet horizontally from any water supply wells. h. The vertical distance from the bottom of any infiltration structural treatment BMP to the historic high groundwater mark shall be at least 10 -feet. Where the groundwater basins do not support beneficial uses, this vertical distance criteria may be reduced, provided groundwater quality is maintained. i. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause a nuisance or pollution as defined in Water Code Section 13050. The final project -specific water quality management plan shall specifically address items, a ., b., and c. above. Priinted.8/23/2017 Page 20 of 20 www.CityofRC.us P383 RESOLUTION NO. 17-77 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. DRC2012-00672, A REQUEST TO DEVELOP 175 ATTACHED CONDOMINIUM UNITS ON 24.19 ACRES OF LAND IN MIXED USE (MU) DISTRICT, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, BETWEEN RED HILL COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE AND THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC TRAIL RIGHT-OF-WAY; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, AND 41 AND 0207-112-09 AND 10. A. Recitals. 1. Pacific Summit -Foothill, LLC, filed an application for the approval of Development Review No. DRC2012-00672, as described .in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 9th day of August 2017, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and continued the application to the August 23, 2017 Planning Commission meeting. 3. On the 23rd day of August 2017, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting or duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said meeting on that date. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced meeting on August 23, 2017, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The project site contains approximately 24.19 acres of a generally irregular configuration having a topography with a 30 percent or greater slope, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between Red Hill Country Club Drive and the Pacific Electric Trail, and is presently vacant; and b. The project site is located in the Mixed Use (MU) District; and c. The property to the north contains Condominiums and single-family homes in the Medium (M) Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and Low (L) Residential District (2- 4 dwelling units per acre), the property to the south contains office, commercial, and condominiums uses in the Mixed Use (MU) District and Medium (M) Residential District (8-14 Attachment 4 P384 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-77 DRC2012-00672 — PACIFIC SUMMIT -FOOTHILL, LLC August 23, 2017 Page 2 dwelling units per acre), the property to the east contains Route 66 Trailhead and condominiums in the Medium (M) Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre), the property to the west contains commercial land uses in the Mixed Use (MU) District, and the proposed project surrounds the Sycamore Inn Restaurant in the Mixed Use (MU) District; and d. The proposed project will be a gated community with 1 vehicle entrance on Foothill Boulevard, located west of the Sycamore Inn restaurant, and 1 Emergency Vehicle Access (EVA) gate on Red Hill Country Club Drive; and e. The proposed project density is 7.23 dwelling units per acre; and f. The application contemplates the development of 44 two- and three-story condominium buildings for the development of 175 attached dwelling units; and g. The 175 units are provided throughout the project site in 44 individual buildings, each containing between 3 and 6 residential units. Units are provided in either a two-story or three-story building complex. There are 26 two-story units, 29 feet tall, with units ranging in size from 1,296 square feet to 1,701 square feet and 18 three-story units, 35 feet tall, with units ranging in size from 1,672 square feet to 2,108 square feet; and h. The proposed unit mix will consist of 28 two-bedroom units (at 1,296 square feet), 119 three-bedroom units (ranging in size from 1,540 square feet to 2,108 square feet) and 28 four-bedroom units (ranging in size from 1,976 square feet to 1,995 square feet). The 9 live/work units include 2 two-bedroom units (with 1,531 square feet of living area and 249 square feet of commercial floor area) and 7 three-bedroom units (ranging in size from 1,782 square feet to 1,916 square feet of living area and 249 square feet of commercial floor area); and i. Proposed architectural styles include Santa Barbara and Provence, and include 360 degree architectural elements such as: tile roofs, stucco finish, multi -paned windows, metal balconies, wood shutters, and additional architectural embellishments; and j. A total of 9 live/work units are provided adjacent to the Foothill Boulevard driveway, with adjacent parking and pedestrian access; and k. Parking for the project site is provided in two -car garages for each unit, providing 350 parking spaces, 9 parking spaces for the live/work units, and 130 open parking spaces. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and b. The proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and c. The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and P385 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-77 DRC2012-00672 — PACIFIC SUMMIT -FOOTHILL, LLC August 23, 2017 Page 3 d. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. A comment letter was received from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) on July 27, 2017 in response to the circulated IS/MND. The only comment CDFW had was in relation to the possible Jurisdictional Waters on the project site. The applicant and their biologists prepared a Jurisdictional Delineation to address CDFW's comments. The Jurisdictional Delineation determined that jurisdictional waters were not present on the project site, but recommended compliance with the CDFW recommended mitigation measure prior to issuance of any grading permit. The Biological Resources section of the IS/MND, was revised to include a mitigation measure requiring the applicant to provide proof to the City that the Streambed Alteration Agreement (1602 Agreement) process has been concluded. According to CEQA Section 15073.5(a), recirculation of a negative declaration is required prior to its adoption when it has been substantially revised after public notice of its availability has been given pursuant to Section 15072. Furthermore, CEQA Section 15073.5(b) states, "a "substantial revision" of the negative declaration shall mean: (1) a new avoidable significant effect is identified and mitigation measure or project revisions must be added in order to reduce the effect to insignificance, or (2) the lead agency determines that the proposed mitigation measures or project revisions will not reduce potential effects to less than significance and new measures or revisions must be required." Here, either the CDFW will determine that notification under Section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code is required for the project, or they will require the applicarit obtain a Streambed Alteration Agreement. The IS/MND was revised to include a discussion of the Jurisdictional Delineation for the project site and a mitigation measure requiring a Streambed Alteration Agreement was added to the MND and the project conditions of approval. The addition of a condition of approval requiring a Streambed Alteration Agreement is not considered substantial evidence in light of the whole record that cannot be mitigated. Therefore, the Streambed Alteration Agreement mitigation measure is not a substantial revision to the MND, and recirculation of the MND is not required; and b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial P386 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-77 DRC2012-00672 — PACIFIC SUMMIT -FOOTHILL, LLC August 23, 2017 Page 4 evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission recommends the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration; and c. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore recommends the City Council adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project; and d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's recommendation is based is the City Planner of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) All Conditions of approval as contained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 17-75 shall apply. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF AUGUST 2017. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Francisco Oaxaca, Chairman ATTEST: Candyc= : rnett, Secretary PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-77 DRC2012-00672 — PACIFIC SUMMIT -FOOTHILL, LLC August 23, 2017 Page 5 I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 23rd day of August 2017, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, OAXACA, WIMBERLY NONE MACIAS, MUNOZ NONE P387 Conditions of Approval Community Development Department Project #: SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 P388 Project Name: Sycamore Heights Location: APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34. and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Variance, and Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Approval is for the subdivision of 24.19 acres into 6 parcels and for the development of 175 attached condominium units in the Mixed Use (MU) District located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between Red Hill Country Club Drive and Pacific Electric Trail Right -of -Way 2. Provide additional parking spaces in the vicinity of the LivefWork units to ensure adequate parking is available for commercial uses. 3. Provide a pedestrian connection to the Pacific Electric Trail along the east side of the project site, subject to approval by the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA). 4. Provide additional landscaping adjacent to the project perimeter wall to the northwest of the Sycamore Inn. 5. For slope planting south of the existing residences along the project's north boundary utilize a tree species and spacing that protects the views of homeowners living north of the project site. Standard Conditions of Approval 6. For all residential development, provide conduit from each unit/lot and a pull box to connect to the street. Provide interior structured wiring for each house/building with minimum Category 5 copper wire, Radio Grade 6 coaxial cable, and a central distribution panel. prior to release of occupancy (fiber -to -the building, FTTB). Plans shall be submitted for Planning Department and Building Official review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. 7. All dwellings shall have the front, side and rear elevations upgraded with architectural treatment, detailing and increased delineation of surface treatment subject to Planning Department review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. 8. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections shall be screened from all sides and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent properties and streets. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Department. Any roof -mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically more than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet, shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent nature with the building design and is detailed consistent with the building. Any roof -mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically less than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet shall be painted consistent with the color scheme of the building. Details shall be included in building plans. Printed. 8/23/2017 www CityafRC.us Project #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 P389 Sycamore Heights APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10 Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Variance, and Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 9. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Department in the amount of $767 prior to the issuance of Building Permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. 10. In those instances requiring long term monitoring (i.e. beyond final certificate of occupancy), the applicant shall provide a written monitoring and reporting program to the Planning Department prior to issuance of Building Permits. Said program shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. 11. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the City Adopted Special Studies Zone for the Red Hill Fault, in a standard format as determined by the Planning Department, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 12. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 13. Approval of Tentative Tract SUBTT16605 Modification is granted subject to the approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2016-00206, Design Review DRC2012-00672, Variance DRC2016-00207, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2012-00673. 14. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolutions of Approval, Conditions of Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). This includes Planning Commission Resolution No.'s 17-76 (for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16606M), 17-77 (for Design Review DRC2012-00672), 17-78 (for Variance DRC2016-00207), and 17-79 (for Tree Removal Permit DRC2012-00673). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and .are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 15. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption and Mitigated Negative Declaration fee in the amount of $2,266.25. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing. 16. Tentative Tract 16605 Modification shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the Engineering Services Department within 3 years from the date of the approval. wrrw,CityofRC.us Printed; 8/23/2017 Page 2 of 20 Project #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: SUBT T 16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 P390 Sycamore Heights APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10 Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Variance, and Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 17. For multi -family residential, property owners are responsible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. 18. Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in accordance with the Development Code Section 17.80.050, and so noted on the grading plans. The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans. The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods. 19. Front yard and corner side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be required per the Development Code. This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting. 20. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Department review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. For development occurring in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, the landscape plans will also be reviewed by Fire Construction Services. 21. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 22. All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than 2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 23. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15 -gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1 -gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5 -gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy, 24. Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees, meandering sidewalks, and intensified landscaping, is required along Foothill Boulevard. 25. Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for Planning Department review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. These criteria shall encourage the natural growth characteristics of the selected tree species. 26. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water efficient landscaping per Development Code Chapter 17.82. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 8/23/2017 Page 3 of 20 Project #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 P391 Sycamore Heights APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10 Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Variance, and Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 27. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes. Multi -family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to Planning Department review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 28. AI! units shall be provided with garage door openers if driveways are Tess than 18 feet in depth from back of sidewalk. 29. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet. 30. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 17 feet long with a required 1 -foot overhang (e.g., over a curb stop). Parallel parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 24 feet long. 31. Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the Planning Department, City Engineer, and Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. For residential development, private gated entrances shall provide adequate turn -around space in front of the gate and a separate visitor lane with call box to avoid cars stacking into the public right-of-way. 32. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. 33. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/plazas/ recreational uses. 34. Access gates to the rear yards shall be constructed from a material more durable than wood gates. Acceptable materials include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC. 35. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 36. Construct block walls between homes (i.e., along interior side and rear property fines), rather than wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency. 37. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination and in conformance with Building and Safety Services Department standards, the Municipal Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department (RCFD) Standards. 38. The site shall be developed and maintained in • accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and Development Code regulations. 39. All ground -mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. Printed. 812312017 vimv.CityofRC.us Page 4 of 20 Project #: SUBTTI66605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 P392 Project Name: Sycamore Heights Location: APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Variance, and Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 40. A uniform hardscape and street furniture design including seating benches, trash receptacles, free-standing potted plants, bike racks, light bollards, etc., shall be utilized and be compatible with the architectural style. Detailed designs shall be submitted for Planning Department review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 41. On corner side yards, provide minimum 5 -foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk. The 5 -foot wall/fence setback and the parkway shall have landscape and irrigation in addition to the required street trees. Detailed landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning Department review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. The parkway landscaping including trees, shrubs, ground covers and irrigation shall be maintained by the property owner. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the parkway maintenance requirement, in a standard format as determined by the Planning Department, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 42. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Department and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 43. For multiple -family development, laundry facilities shall be provided as required by the Development Code. 44. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department and Police Department (909-477-2800) prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 45. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Services Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance and final acceptance granted prior to occupancy. 46. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 47. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Department. 48. Revised Site Plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Planning Department review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 49. Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock. Other stone veneers may be manufactured products. 50. Street names shall be submitted for Planning Department review and approval in accordance with the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map www.CityofRC.us Printed: 8!23!2017 Page 5 of 20 Project n: SUB i T 16605M, DRC20i2-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-006673 P393 Project Name: Sycamore Heights Location: APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Variance, and Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 51. If no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units with all receptacles shielded from public view. 52. Any approval for Design Review DRC2012-00672, Variance DRC2016-00207, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2012-00673 shall expire if Building Permits are not issued within 5 years from the date of approval, or a time extension has been granted. 53. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Services Department. 54. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building. 55. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Services Department. 56. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions shall restrict the storage of recreational vehicles on this site unless they are the principal source of transportation for the owner and prohibit parking on interior circulation aisles other than in designated visitor parking areas. 57. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Services Department and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer. The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Department a fist of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes. 58. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. 59. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owners at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/fences along the project perimeter. 60. Slope fencing along side property lines may be wrought iron or black plastic coated chain link to maintain an open feeling and enhance views. Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions Printed; 8/23/2017 gage 6 of 20 www.CityofRC.us Project #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 P394 Sycamore Heights APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10 Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Variance, and Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Foothill Boulevard shall be improved in accordance with the City's "Major Divided Arterial" standards along the entire project frontage. a. Parkway improvements, including special streetlights, street trees and sidewalk, shall conform to the Foothill Boulevard District guidelines outlined in the Development Code and the Route 66/Foothill Boulevard Visual Improvement Plan. b. Complete parkway improvements on the north side between the Pacific Electric Trail bridge and the adjacent Sycamore Inn property. City has already installed the curb and gutter. Add parkway improvements including sidewalk, street trees, streetlights and curbside drain outlets, per Standard Drawing 107-B or 107-C as needed. c. Right turn lane, per Standard Drawing 119 (Bus Bay -Right Turn Lane option), shall be at least 150 feet in length with a 60 -foot transition. The right turn lane shall be based off existing Foothill Boulevard elevations. d. Provide an interim physical barrier (at the project entrance) to left turns to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. e. Provide 8,600 Lumen LED streetlights. The street lights shall be owned by the City. Developer shall be responsible to coordinate and pay all costs to provide SCE power on City owned street lights. Coordinate with City staff for design and installation requirements. f. Foothill drive approach shall have a 20 -foot radius for the inbound right turn and a least a 31 -foot radius for the outbound right turn, with sidewalk crossing the approach close to perpendicular at the zero curb face. Right-of-way dedication shall encompass the full public sidewalk crossing . Driveway median and accent paving shall not extend into the public right-of-way. g. Entry gates shall conform to the City's Residential Project Gated Entrance design guideline. h. Provide traffic signage and striping as required including northbound and southbound left turn and through movement time restrictions on Red Hill Country Club Drive at Foothill Boulevard during the peak hours. i. Construct access ramps at the street type entrance on Foothill Boulevard to comply with current ADA requirements. A detail will have to be added to the street improvement plan showing the design details, elevations, and grades of the access ramp to substantiate they comply with current ADA requirements. Printed: 8/23/2017 Page 7 of 20 www.CityofRC.us Project r"ti : Project Name: Location: Project Type: SUIS T T16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 P395 Sycamore Heights APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10 Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Variance, and Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following special Conditions 2. Provide the fair share contribution for the Year 2035 as stated in the project traffic impact study for Foothill Boulevard at San Bernardino Road. Ultimate improvements include construction of a 3rd westbound and a 3rd eastbound through lane, restriping the northbound shared left turn/through lane into a shared left turn/through/right turn lane and modifications to the traffic signal. 3. Make a in -lieu contribution for a prorated share of the cost of the future improvements along the project frontage, to the future centerline of Foothill Boulevard. Final construction cost estimate to be approved by the City Engineer. 4. Red Hill Country Club Drive shall be improved in accordance with the City's "Local Street" standards along the project frontage. a. Provide curb and gutter, asphalt pavement, sidewalk, street trees and a drive approach for emergency vehicle access on the east side of the existing street. b. Drive approach for emergency vehicle access on Red Hill Country Club Drive shall be installed per Standard Drawing 105-C, with thicker concrete or reinforced sidewalk to meet Fire District standards. c. Provide a minimum 6 -foot curb adjacent sidewalk width. Install retaining walls as needed. d. Provide 5800 Lumen HPSV-equivalent LED streetlights along the frontage. The street lights shall be owned by the City. Developer shall be responsible to coordinate and pay all costs to provide SCE power on City owned street lights. Coordinate with City staff for design and installation requirements. e. Provide traffic signage and striping as required. 5. Parkways shall slope at 2 percent from 1 foot behind the sidewalk to the top of the curb, along all street frontages. 6. Dedicate Lots A, B and C from the approved Tentative Map to the City. 7. Provide a copy of the on-site landscaping plans for Engineering Services Department review regarding conformance with Foothill Boulevard beautification master plan. 8. Add the following note. to any private landscape plans that show street trees; "All improvements within the public right-of-way, including street trees, shall be installed per the public improvement plans". If there is a discrepancy between the public and private plans, the street improvement plans will govern. www.CityofRC.us Printed. 8/23/2017 Page 8 of 20 Project >r: Project Name: Location: Project Type: SUB -11-16605M, DRC2012-006672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-006673 P396 Sycamore Heights APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10 Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Variance, and Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 9. Extend Master Plan Storm Drain Line III -1 from Foothill Boulevard to Red Hill Country Club Drive. The applicant shall submit a detailed hydrology study to engineering and said study shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of a Building Permit, whichever occurs first. Said study shall include the existing, interim and the ultimate proposed hydrologic conditions including key elevations, drainage patterns and proposed locations and sizes of all existing and proposed drainage devices. The hydrology study shall present a full breakdown of all the runoff generated on- and off-site. If there are any impacts to the downstream channel, the City will require full installation of the Master Plan Storm Drain culvert, south of Foothill Boulevard, along with any right-of-way acquisition and easements that may be required. Standard drainage fees for the site shall be credited to the cost of permanent master plan facilities, in accordance with City Policy. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover over sizing costs, in excess of fees from future development within the same tributary area. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within six months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. a. Construct private, on-site storm drains to collect all project runoff, and discharges from adjacent properties to the north and convey to the Master Plan Storm Drain. b. Provide manholes at public-private junctions. 10. Maintenance access shall be granted to the City for the on-site portion of the master plan storm drain. All manholes shall be easily accessible. 11. Private drainage facilities shall prevent developed flows from entering the Pacific Electric Trail right-of-way. Existing inlet facilities for culverts in the SBCTA right-of-way shall be protected. Final drainage study shall address whether those culverts can be used for runoff from perimeter slopes or undeveloped portions of the project site. Also, surface drainage shall not flow over City right-of-way or maintained areas. Provide intercept of surface drainage such as by use of v -gutters and provide for drainage to enter street through parkway culverts. 12. The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) fronting the project site shall be removed or placed underground, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. All services crossing Foothill Boulevard and/or Red Hill Country Club Drive shall be undergrounded at the same time. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development (or redevelopment) as it occurs on the opposite side of the street. If the developer fails to submit said reimbursement agreement within six months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. a. All existing overhead utilities located on site shall be removed or placed underground. Printed; 8/23/2017 Page 9 of 20 wwvw.CityofRC.us Project #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: SUBTT16606M, DRC2012-00672, DRC20166-00207, and DRC2012-00673 P397 Sycamore Heights APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10 Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Variance, and Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 13. It shall be the developer's responsibility to have the current FIRM Zone A designation removed from the project area. The developer shall provide drainage/or flood protection facilities sufficient to obtain an unshaded "X" designation. The developer's engineer shall prepare all necessary reports, plans, hydrologic/hydraulic calculations. A Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) shall be required prior to grading permits. A Letter of Map Revision (LOMB) shall be issued by FEMA prior to certificate of occupancy. 14. Master Plan Storm Drain Line III -1 shall be constructed and aligned so that it remains within the developer's property before connecting into the existing storm drain in the Foothill Boulevard right-of-way. A permanent storm drain easement shall be granted to the City for the public storm drain lines within the developer's ,property prior to acceptance of the improvements. As an alternative option to constructing the storm drain line and securing easements within the developer's property, at its sole cost and expense, the developer may voluntarily obtain a perpetual easement through the property located at 8318 Foothill Boulevard (Sycamore Inn) for such storm drain lines. Should the developer not obtain the necessary easement prior to the filing of the final map with the City, this alternative option shall be void and the developer shall construct the storm drain lines exclusively within the developer's property. Standard Conditions of Approval 15. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 16. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. www.CiryofRC.us Printed: 8/23/2017 Page 10 of 20 Project #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: SUBT T 16605111, DRC2012-00672, 0RC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 P398 Sycamore Heights APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10 Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Variance, and Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 17. Improvement Hans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3 -inch pvc with pull rope or as specified. e. The proposed development is slated to be included in the City's Fiber Optic / Broadband service business plan that would provide a City owned Fiber -to -the -Premise (FTTP) infrastructure. Proposed fiber optic conduits and vaults will be placed underground within a duct and structure system to be installed by the Master Developer per Standard Drawing 135-137. The size, placement and location of the conduit and vaults shall be shown on the Street Improvement and/or Public improvement Plans and subject to the Engineering Services Department's review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or final map approval, whichever comes first. f. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per latest ADA standards or as directed by the City Engineer. g. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. h. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards. i. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to submittal for first plan check. 18. Street trees, a minimum of 15 -gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. Printed: 8/23/2017 Page 11 of 20 .CityafC,us Project #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: SUBT T 'i 6605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 P399 Sycamore Heights APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10 Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Variance, and Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 19. lnstall street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating : "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet — (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Foothill Boulevard in ROW and Median Botanical Name - Prunus blireina Common Name - N.C.N. Min. Grow Space - 3' Spacing - 20' O.C. Size -15 gallon Foothill Boulevard On-site Botanical Name - Platanus acerifolia Common Name - London Plane Tree Min. Grow Space - 7' Spacing - 40' O.C. Size - 15 gallon Red Hill Country Club Drive Botanical Name - Platanus acerifolia Common Name - London Plane Tree Min. Grow Space - 7' Spacing - 40' O.C. Size - 15 gallon Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 20. lntersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. 21. Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective Beautification Master Plan: Foothill Boulevard Printed: 8/23/2017 Page 12 of 20 wvvvv.CityofRC.us Project #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: SUB T T 16605M, 0RC2012-006672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 P400 Sycamore Heights APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10 Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Variance, and Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 22. Provide separate utility services to each building including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 23. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 24. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 25. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. 26. Permits shall be obtained from the following agencies for work within their right of way: San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA) 27. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Permits issued on or after June 2, 2014, must complete the reimbursement process through the City's Accelerate online portal within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project or the deposit will be forfeited. Permits issued before June 2, 2014, require the following when applying for a deposit reimbursement: a completed CD -2 form, a copy of the cashier's receipt showing the deposit amount, and all weight tickets. Instructions and forms are available at the City's web site, www.CityofRC.us, under City Hall; Engineering; Environmental Programs. 28. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval. 29. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. 30. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline): 60 total feet on Foothill Boulevard 30 total feet on Red Hill Country Club Drive 31. All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be quit -claimed or delineated on the final map. 32. Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum of 7 feet measured from the face of curbs to the right-of-way. 33. Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 8/23/2017 Page 13 of 20 F= rc:j Ct rr: Project Name: Location: Project Type: SUBT F.1660511/1, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-006673 P401 Sycamore Heights APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10 Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Variance, and Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 34. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all common roads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to, or concurrent with the final map. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout "Information for Grading Plans and Permit". 2. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code and/or the California Residential Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices . The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 3. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 4. A geologic report shah be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 5. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 6. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. 7. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. All dust control sign (s) shall be located outside of the public right of way. 8. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, the rough grading plan shall be a separate plan submittal and permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 9. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall(s) on property line(s) or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 10. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show the accessibility path from the public right of way and the accessibility parking stalls to the building doors in conformance with the current adopted California Building Code. All accessibility ramps shall show sufficient detail including gradients, elevations, and dimensions and comply with the current adopted California Building Code. ,wv.CityolRC.us Printed: 8123/2017 Page 14 of 20 Project rr: SUM i t 16605M, DRC20 i2-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 P402 Project Name: Sycamore Heights Location: APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Variance, and Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 11. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on-site construction where possible, and shall provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 12. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the grading plan shall show that all manufactured slopes shall be a minimum 2 -foot offset from the public right of way, permitted line, or the adjacent private property. All slope offsets shall meet the requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 13. Prior to the issuance of a grading plan for multi -family projects, the private streets and drive aisles within mufti -family developments shall include street plans as part of the Grading and Drainage Plan set. The private street plan view shall show typical street sections. The private street profile view shall show the private street/drive aisle centerline. 14. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the grading and drainage plan shall show the maximum parking stall gradient at 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code. 15. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 16. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100 -feet beyond project boundary. 17. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 18. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre -grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre -grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over -excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the CMI Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 19. All roof drainage flowing to the public right of way (Foothill Boulevard) must drain under the sidewalk through a parkway culvert approved by the Engineering Department. This shall be shown on both the grading and drainage plan and Engineering Services Department required plans. Printed; 8/23/2017 Page 15 of 20 www.CityofRC.us i3roject #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: SUBI T -lb6051vi, DRC2012-00072, DRC2018-00207, and DRC2012-00673 P403 Sycamore Heights APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10 Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Variance, and Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 20. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the permitted grading plan (or architectural site plan) set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC1804.31CRC R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.21CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.21CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted California Building Code/Residential Code. 21. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall obtain a signed and notarized letter from the adjacent property owner(s) for ALL work proposed on the adjacent property. The letter shall be scanned and pasted onto thepermitted grading plan set. The letter shall show on either the title sheet or a detail sheet of the grading and drainage plan set. 22. Prior to approval of the project -specific storm water quality management plan, the applicant shall submit to the Building Official, or his designee, a precise grading plan showing the location and elevations of existing topographical features, and showing the location and proposed elevations of proposed structures and drainage of the site. 23. A drainage study showing a 100 -year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. The report shall contain water surface profile gradient calculations for all storm drain pipes 12 -inches and larger in diameter. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. In addition, the project specific drainage study shall provide inlet calculations showing the proper sizing of the water quality management plan storm water flows into the proposed structural storm water treatment devices. 24. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 25. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage acceptance easements(s) from adjacent downstream property owner(s) or discharge flows in a natural condition (concentrated flows are not accepted) and shall provide the Building and Safety Official a drainage study showing the proposed flows do not exceed the existing flows prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. 26. Roof water is not permitted to flow over the public parkway and shall be directed to an under parkway culvert per City of Rancho Cucamonga requirements prior to issuance of a grading permit. 27. Flow lines steeper than 6 percent could be erosive. The applicant shall provide hard lined gutters and swales where concentrated flows exceed 3fps, and anywhere that flow lines exceed 10 percent. This shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan prior to issuance of a grading permit. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 8!2312017 Page 16 of 20 SUE! 116605M, Dr,C:2012-00472, 1.: 02016-00207, and DRC2012-u0673 P404 Project Name: Sycamore Heights Location: APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Variance, and Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 28. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall demonstrate that the storm water run-off will not adversely affect the downstream properties and that the water may legally discharge to the downstream properties. The engineer of record shall show on the final permitted grading and drainage plan one (1) or more of the following items are met: a) There is sufficient downstream capacity to accept the proposed storm water flows and that the downstream property owner have provided permission to accept the upstream storm water flows; b) a legal document/entity exists allowing developed storm water flows to be discharged to the property lower in elevation; c) a storm drain system to safely convey the storm water flows to a public storm drain system without causing flooding to adjacent property(ies). 29. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the latest adopted California Plumbing Code. Private storm drain improvements shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan. 30. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy or final sign off by the Building Inspector the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) storm water treatment devices and best management practices (BMP). 31. Prior to approval of the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), the WQMP shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 32. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment devices and best management practices (BMP) as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan, shall be provided for by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the approval of the Water Quality Management Plan. Said CC&R's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. 33. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the grading and drainage plan shall show concrete drainage swales at the toe of slopes and discharge the water to an approved drainage facility. 34. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 35. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID). The WDID number shall also be shown on the WQMP Site and Drainage Plan document. 36. The applicant shall provide a copy of a completed EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) for each underground infiltration device, with the Facility 10 Number assigned, to the Building and Safety Services Department Official prior to issuance of the Grading Permit and/or approval of the project -specific Water Quality Management Plan. A copy of EPA Form 7520-16 shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set, and a copy of said form shall be included in the project -specific Water Quality Management Plan. Printed: 8/23/2017 Page 17 of 20 www.CityofRC.us Project rr: Project Name: Location: Project Type: SU51 T1 c Lu5M, DR,C20 i 2-j0672, uRC,0 l6-0020?, anc JRC201-00673 P405 Sycamore Heights APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10 Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Variance, and Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 37. The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for the Class V Injection Wells/underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 38. The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the structural storm water treatment devices, commonly referred to as BMPs, to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 39. The land/property owner shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a biennial basis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. 40. A final project -specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be approved by the Building and Safety Director, or his designee, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit or any building permit. 41. Prior to the start of landscaping operations, the landscape architect and the landscape contractor shall provide a sample of the weed fabric barrier to the Project Planner, City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The weed barrier shall be permeable. 42. The final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP) shall include executed maintenance agreements along with the maintenance guidelines for all proprietary structural storm water treatment devices (BMP's). In the event the applicant cannot get the proprietary device maintenance agreements executed prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant is required to submit a letter to be included within the WQMP document, and scanned and pasted onto the Site and Drainage Plan which states that prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy with applicant shall enter into a contract for the maintenance of the proprietary storm water treatment device. If the proprietary storm water treatment device is part of a residential subdivision, prior to the sale of the residential lot, the developer shall include maintenance agreement(s) as part of the sale of the residential lot to the buyer. A copy of the maintenance agreements to be included in the sale of the property shall be included within the WQMP document. 43. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the project specific water quality management plan all private storm water catch basin inlets shall include insert filters to capture those pollutants of concern as addressed in the in the final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP). At a minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris. All catch basin insert filters shall be maintained on a regular basis as described in the "Inspection and Maintenance Responsibility for Post Construction BMP" section of the final project -specific water quality management plan. Printed: 8123/2017 www.CityofRC.us Page 18 of 20 r i of e C l ?r: Project Name: Location: Project Type: UST i 1 edO5M, Dr2C2012-0O6' 2, DRC20 i 6-j{j!J7, anu Dr:C 2u`i 2-0067 3 P406 Sycamore Heights APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10 Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Variance, and Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 44. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project -Specific Water Quality Management Plan shall include a completed copy of "Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet" located in Appendix D "Section VII -- Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety Recommendations, ..." of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans. The infiltration study shall include the Soil Engineer's recommendations for Appendix D, Table VI1.3: Suitability Assessment Related Considerations for Infiltration Facility Safety Factors". 45. Prior to approval of the final project -specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project -specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". 46. The subject project, shall accept all existing off-site storm water drainage flows and safely convey those flows through or around the project site. If existing off-site storm water drainage flows mix with any on-site storm water drainage flows, then the off-site storm water drainage flows shall be treated with the on-site storm water drainage flows for storm water quality purposes, prior to discharging the storm water drainage flows from the project site. 47. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the Building Official, or his designee, the civil engineer of record shall file a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Post Construction Storm Water Treatment Devices As -Built Certificate with the Environmental Programs Coordinator, City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Services Department. 48. As the use of drywells are proposed for the structural storm water treatment device, to meet the infiltration requirements of the current Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Systems (MS4) Permit, adequate source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration shall be evaluated prior to infiltration and discussed in the final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan document. Printed: 8/23/2017 Page 19 of 20 www.CityofRC.us rf'Cject rr: Project Name: Location: Project Type: dUo 1 t 166051v1, DR;_•4)i2-006/2, ur,L20i6-Ou20r, =aid DRC%u 12-D6373 P407 Sycamore Heights APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10 Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Variance, and Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 49. GROUND WATER PROTECTION: Prior to approval of the final project specific water quality management plan (WQMP), the WQMP document shall meet the requirements of the State Water Resources Control Board Order No. R8-2010-0036 (NPDES No. CAS 618036), the San Bernardino County Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Separation (MS4) Permit reads: Section XI.D(Water Quality Management Plan Requirements).8(Groundwater Protection): Treatment Control BMPs utilizing infiltration [exclusive of incidental infiltration and BMPs not designed to primarily function as infiltration devices (such as grassy swales, detention basins, vegetated buffer strips, constructed wetlands, etc.)] must comply with the following minimum requirements to protect groundwater: a. Use of structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause or contribute to an exceedance of ground water quality objectives. b. Source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration should be evaluated prior to infiltration. c. Adequate pretreatment of runoff prior to infiltration shall be required in gas stations and large commercial parking lots. (NOTE: The State Water Quality Control Board defines a large commercial parking lot as `100,000 sq. ft. or more of commercial development to include parking lot (with 100 or more vehicle traffics), OR, by means of 5,000sqft or more of allowable space designated for parking purposes'). d. Unless adequate pre-treatment of runoff is provided prior to infiltration structural infiltration treatment BMPs must not be used for areas of industrial or Tight industrial activity{77}, areas subject to high vehicular traffic (25,000 or more daily traffic); car washes; fleet storage areas; nurseries; or any other high threat to water quality land uses or activities. e. Class V injection wells or dry wells must not be placed in areas subject to vehicular{78} repair or maintenance activities{79}, such as an auto body repair shop, automotive repair shop, new and used car dealership, specialty repair shop (e.g., transmission and muffler repair shop) or any facility that does any vehicular repair work. f. Structural infiltration BMP treatment shall not be used at sites that are known to have soil and groundwater contamination. g. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall be located at least 100 feet horizontally from any water supply wells. h. The vertical distance from the bottom of any infiltration structural treatment BMP to the historic high groundwater mark shall be at least 10 -feet. Where the groundwater basins do not support beneficial uses, this vertical distance criteria may be reduced, provided groundwater quality is maintained. i. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause a nuisance or pollution as defined in Water Code Section 13050. The final project -specific water quality management plan shall specifically address items, a ., b., and c. above. Printed: 8123/2017 Page 20 of 20 www.CityofRC.us P408 RESOLUTION NO. 17-78 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VARIANCE NO. DRC2016-00207, A REQUEST TO EXCEED THE 30 FOOT BUILDING ENVELOPE ESTABLISHED BY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION 17.122.020.D.1.E.(1 AND II) FOR THE DEVELOP 175 ATTACHED CONDOMINIUM UNITS ON 24.19 ACRES OF LAND IN THE MIXED USE (MU) DISTRICT, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, BETWEEN RED HILL COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE AND THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC TRAIL RIGHT-OF-WAY; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, AND 41 AND 0207-112-09 AND 10. A. Recitals. 1. Pacific Summit -Foothill, LLC, filed an application for the issuance of Variance No. DRC2016-00207 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Variance request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 9th day of August 2017, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and continued the application to the August 23, 2017 Planning Commission meeting. 3. On the 23rd day of August 2017, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing on August 23, 2017, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The project site contains approximately 24.19 acres of a generally irregular configuration having a topography with a 30 percent or greater slope, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between Red Hill Country Club Drive and the Pacific Electric Trail, and is presently vacant; and b. The project site is located in the Mixed Use (MU) District; and c. The property to the north contains Condominiums and single-family homes in the Medium (M) Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and Low (L) Residential District (2 - Attachment 5 P409 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-78 DRC2016-00207 — PACIFIC SUMMIT — FOOTHILL, LLC August 23, 2017 Page 2 4 dwelling units per acre), the property to the south contains office, commercial, and condominiums uses in the Mixed Use (MU) District and Medium (M) Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre), the property to the east contains Route 66 Trailhead and condominiums in the Medium (M) Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre), the property to the west contains commercial land uses in the Mixed Use (MU) District, and the proposed project surrounds the Sycamore Inn Restaurant in the Mixed Use (MU) District; and d. Approximately half of the project site is located within the Hillside Overlay District of the Zoning Map, of which the Development Code establishes building envelopes and maximum building height for properties located in hillside areas. Hillside Development criteria, Section 17.122.020(D)(e) of the Development Code, establishes a 30 -foot maximum building height for all structures located in the Hillside Overlay District; and e. The applicant is proposing a total of 44 condominium units including 26 two-story tri-plex units up to a maximum of 29 feet in height, and 18 three-story four-, five-, and six-plex units up to a maximum of 35 feet in height; and f. Roughly half of the three-story units are located within the Hillside Overlay District and exceed the allowable maximum 30 -foot building height. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulations would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the Development Code. The Hillside Development building height development standard is necessary to regulate maximum building height and bulk on slope conditions when regulating the development of a single-family home in a residential district; these development standards were not intended to regulate building height for multi -family development in the Mixed Use District. Here, the applicant proposes grading the site into large flat building tiers to accommodate the proposed attached multi -family development. As the design and development of the proposed units will not be located on a slope condition and less than half of the project site is located in the Hillside Overlay District, enforcement of the development standard is inconsistent with the objectives of the Development Code; and b. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same district. The eastern portion of the project site has is a grade change ranging from a high of 1,375 feet along the northern property line to a low of 1,245 feet along the southern property line, a difference of approximately 130 feet. The applicant is proposing to grade the site into two large building tiers to accommodate the development of attached multi -family condominium buildings ranging from 3 to 6 units in 44 buildings. The entire project site is located within the Mixed Use District and the eastern portion of the site is subject to the Hillside Overlay District. The Mixed Use District permits a density up to 50 dwelling units per acre and buildings up to 75 feet high. The multi -family units located within the Hillside Overlay District propose to exceed Hillside Development criteria by 5 feet, which is over 60 feet below the height of buildings to the north. The location of these buildings and their proposed height are situated so that their eventual development will not negatively impact to adjacent properties; and P410 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-78 VAR DRC2016-00207 -- PACIFIC SUMMIT -FOOTHILL, LLC August 23, 2017 Page 3 c. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district. The increase in building height allows the proposed multi -family units to be distributed throughout the entire project site. Enforcement of the height limit would not prevent the proposed grading and would unduly force a density shift within the project so that a higher number of units would be located on the westerly half of the project, so that all units on the easterly half of the project site were within the Hillside Development standard height limits. This density shift will negatively impact the Sycamore Inn and surrounding properties by focusing a significant increase in the number of units on the westerly half of the project site; and d. That the granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the [imitations on other properties classified in the same district. The project site is located in the Mixed Use, which was designed to accommodate a variety of land uses. The Mixed Use District was never intended to apply to properties located on hillside conditions or be subject to the Hillside Overlay District. Because the Mixed Use District can accommodate a variety of land uses it was never intended to be subject to the Hillside Development criteria of the General Plan and Development Code, in fact, this is the only Mixed Use district in the City with a slope condition. The intent of the Hillside Development criteria of the General Plan and Development Code was to regulate single-family residential hillside development on slopes 8% and greater. The intent of the Hillside Development criteria was to address the development natural slopes, and in this case, we have a 24 -acre fractured site surrounded by developed land. The project site has been so altered by surrounding development, is not a natural slope, is outside the intent of the Hillside Development requirements of the Development Code, and is so unique that there are no other Mixed Use District slope conditions within the City; and e. That the granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The increased building heights will not negatively impact the surrounding property owners. Due to the grade difference between the project site and properties to the north, the 5 -foot increase in building height will not negatively impact views of properties to the north and the additional height increase only impacts views on the project site. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. A comment letter was received from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) on July 27, 2017 in response to the circulated IS/MND. The only comment CDFW had was in relation to the possible Jurisdictional Waters on the project site. The applicant P411 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-78 VAR DRC2016-00207 — PACIFIC SUMMIT -FOOTHILL, LLC August 23, 2017 Page 4 and their biologists prepared a Jurisdictional Delineation to address CDFW's comments. The Jurisdictional Delineation determined that jurisdictional waters were not present on the project site, but recommended compliance with the CDFW recommended mitigation measure prior to issuance of any grading permit. The Biological Resources section of the IS/MND, was revised to include a mitigation measure requiring the applicant to provide proof to the City that the Streambed Alteration Agreement (1602 Agreement) process has been concluded. According to CEQA Section 15073.5(a), recirculation of a negative declaration is required prior to its adoption when it has been substantially revised after public notice of its availability has been given pursuant to Section 15072. Furthermore, CEQA Section 15073.5(b) states, "a "substantial revision" of the negative declaration shall mean: (1) a new avoidable significant effect is identified and mitigation measure or project revisions must be added in order to reduce the effect to insignificance, or (2) the lead agency determines that the proposed mitigation measures or project revisions will not reduce potential effects to less than significance and new measures or revisions must be required." Here, either the CDFW will determine that notification under Section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code is required for the project, or they will require the applicant obtain a Streambed Alteration Agreement. The IS/MND was revised to include a discussion of the Jurisdictional Delineation for the project site and a mitigation measure requiring a Streambed Alteration Agreement was added to the MND and the project conditions of approval. The addition of a condition of approval requiring a Streambed Alteration Agreement is not considered substantial evidence in light of the whole record that cannot be mitigated. Therefore, the Streambed Alteration Agreement mitigation measure is not a substantial revision to the MND, and recirculation of the MND is not required; and b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (1) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby recommends the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration; and c. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore recommends the City Council adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project; and d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's recommendation is based is the City Planner of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. a. Based on these findings and all evidence in the record, the Planning Commission concurs with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required pursuant to CEQA in connection with the City's consideration of the [current application.] P412 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-78 VAR DRC2016-00207 — PACIFIC SUMMIT -FOOTHILL, LLC August 23, 2017 Page 5 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached standard conditions incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) All Conditions of Approval as contained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 17-75 shall apply. 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF AUGUST 2017. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: ATTEST: Francisco Oaxaca, Chairman Candy Burnett, Secretary 1, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 23rd day of August 2017, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, OAXACA, WIMBERLY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE' ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MACIAS, MUNOZ ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: NONE Conditions of Approval ry�'�s tk1 CommunityDevelopment Department Project #: SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 P413 Project Name: Sycamore Heights Location: APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31. 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Variance, and Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Approval is for the subdivision of 24.19 acres into 6 parcels and for the development of 175 attached condominium units in the Mixed Use (MU) District located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between Red Hill Country Club Drive and Pacific Electric Trail Right -of -Way 2. Provide additional parking spaces in the vicinity of the LivelWork units to ensure adequate parking is available for commercial uses. 3. Provide a pedestrian connection to the Pacific Electric Trail along the east side of the project site subject to approval by the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA). 4. Provide additional landscaping adjacent to the project perimeter wall to the northwest of the Sycamore Inn. 5. For slope planting south of the existing residences along the project's north boundary utilize a tree species and spacing that protects the views of homeowners living north of the project site. Standard Conditions of Approval 6. For all residential development, provide conduit from each unit/lot and a pull box to connect to the street. Provide interior structured wiring for each house/building with minimum Category 5 copper wire, Radio Grade 6 coaxial cable, and a central distribution panel, prior to release of occupancy (fiber -to -the building, FTTB). Plans shall be submitted for Planning Department and Building Official review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. 7. All dwellings shall have the front, side and rear elevations upgraded with architectural treatment, detailing and increased delineation of surface treatment subject to Planning Department review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. 8. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections shall be screened from all sides and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent proper -ties and streets. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Department. Any roof -mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically more than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet, shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent nature with the building design and is detailed consistent with the building. Any roof -mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically less than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet shall be painted consistent with the color scheme of the building. Details shall be included in building plans. Printed 8/212017 WVAV CityofRC-us Project #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 P414 Sycamore Heights APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10 Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Variance, and Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 9. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Department in the amount of $767 prior to the issuance of Building Permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. 10. In those instances requiring long term monitoring (i.e. beyond final certificate of occupancy), the applicant shall provide a written monitoring and reporting program to the Planning Department prior to issuance of Building Permits. Said program shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. 11. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the City Adopted Special Studies Zone for the Red Hill Fault, in a standard format as determined by the Planning Department, prior to accepting a cash deposit an any property. 12. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees" may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 13. Approval of Tentative Tract SUBTT16605 Modification is granted subject to the approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2016-00206, Design Review DRC2012-00672, Variance DRC2016-00207, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2012-00673. 14. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolutions of Approval, Conditions of Approval, and ail environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). This includes Planning Commission Resolution No.'s 17-76 (for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16606M), 17-77 (for Design Review DRC2012-00672), 17-78 (for Variance DRC2016-00207), and 17-79 (for Tree Removal Permit DRC2012-00673). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed . Engineer/Architect. 15. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption and Mitigated Negative Declaration fee in the amount of $2,266.25. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing. 16. Tentative Tract 16605 Modification shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the Engineering Services Department within 3 years from the date of the approval. Printed 8123i2017 vvww.CityofRC.us Page 2 of 20 Project #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 P415 Sycamore Heights APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10 Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Variance, and Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 17. For multi -family residential, property owners are responsible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. 18. Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in accordance with the Development Code Section 17.80.050, and so noted on the grading plans. The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans. The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods. 19. Front yard and corner side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be required per the Development Code. This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting. 20. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Department review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. For development occurring in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, the landscape plans will also be reviewed by Fire Construction Services. 21. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 22. All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than 2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 23. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15 -gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1 -gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5 -gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 24. Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees, meandering sidewalks, and intensified landscaping, is required along Foothill Boulevard. 25. Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for Planning Department review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. These criteria shall encourage the natural growth characteristics of the selected tree species. 26. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water efficient landscaping per Development Code Chapter 17.82. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 8123!2417 Page 3 of 20 Project #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: SUB T T16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 P416 Sycamore Heights APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10 Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Variance, and Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 27. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes. Multi -family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to Planning Department review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 28. All units shall be provided with garage door openers if driveways are fess than 18 feet in depth from back of sidewalk. 29. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet. 30. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 17 feet long with a required 1 -foot overhang (e.g., over a curb stop). Parallel parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 24 feet long. 31. Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the Planning Department, City Engineer, and Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. For residential development, private gated entrances shall provide adequate turn -around space in front of the gate and a separate visitor lane with call box to avoid cars stacking into the public right-of-way. 32. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. 33. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/plazas/ recreational uses. 34. Access gates to the rear yards shall be constructed from a material more durable than wood gates . Acceptable materials include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC. 35. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 36. Construct block walls between homes (i.e., along interior side and rear property lines), rather than wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency. 37. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination and in conformance with Building and Safety Services Department standards, the Municipal Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department (RCFD) Standards. 38. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and Development Code regulations. 39. All ground -mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. Printed: 8/23/2017 Page 4 of 20 vrww.CiRyofRC,us Project #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 P417 Sycamore Heights APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10 Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Variance, and Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 40. A uniform hardscape and street furniture design including seating benches, trash receptacles, free-standing potted plants, bike racks, light bollards, etc., shall be utilized and be compatible with the architectural style. Detailed designs shall be submitted for Planning Department review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 41. On corner side yards, provide minimum 5 -foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk. The 5 -foot wall/fence setback and the parkway shall have landscape and irrigation in addition to the required street trees. Detailed landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning Department review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. The parkway landscaping including trees, shrubs, ground covers and irrigation shall be maintained by the property owner. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the parkway maintenance requirement, in a standard format as determined by the Planning Department, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 42. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Department and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 43. For multiple -family development, laundry facilities shall be provided as required by the Development Code. 44. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department and Police Department (909-477-2800) prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 45. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Services Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance and final acceptance granted prior to occupancy. 46. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 47. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Department. 48. Revised Site Plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Planning Department review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 49. Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock. Other stone veneers may be manufactured products. 50. Street names shall be submitted for Planning Department review and approval in accordance with the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map www.0 ityofRC.us Printed: 8/23/2017 Page 5 of 20 Project #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: SUB T T16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC201.2-00673 P418 Sycamore Heights APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10 Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Variance, and Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 51. If no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units with all receptacles shielded from public view. 52. Any approval for Design Review DRC2012-00672, Variance DRC2016-00207, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2012-00673 shall expire if Building Permits are not issued within 5 years from the date of approval, or a time extension has been granted. 53. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Services Department. 54. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building. 55. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Services Department. 56. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions shall restrict the storage of recreational vehicles on this site unless they are the principal source of transportation for the owner and prohibit parking on interior circulation aisles other than in designated visitor parking areas. 57. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Services Department and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer. The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Department a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes. 58. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. 59. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owners at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/fences along the project perimeter. 60. Slope fencing along side property lines may be wrought iron or black plastic coated chain link to maintain an open feeling and enhance views. Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions www,CityofRC.us Printed: 8123!2017 Page 6 of 20 Project #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 P419 Sycamore Heights APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10 Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Variance, and Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineerinq Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Foothill Boulevard shall be improved in accordance with the City's "Major Divided Arterial" standards along the entire project frontage. a. Parkway improvements, including special streetlights, street trees and sidewalk, shall conform to the Foothill Boulevard District guidelines outlined in the Development Code and the Route 66/Foothill Boulevard Visual Improvement Plan. b. Complete parkway improvements on the north side between the Pacific Electric Trail bridge and the adjacent Sycamore Inn property. City has already installed the curb and gutter. Add parkway improvements including sidewalk, street trees, streetlights and curbside drain outlets, per Standard Drawing 107-B or 107-C as needed. c. Right turn lane, per Standard Drawing 119 (Bus Bay -Right Turn Lane option), shall be at least 150 feet in length with a 60 -foot transition. The right turn lane shall be based off existing Foothill Boulevard elevations. d. Provide an interim physical barrier (at the project entrance) to left turns to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. e. Provide 8,600 Lumen LED streetlights. The street lights shall be owned by the City. Developer shall be responsible to coordinate and pay all costs to provide SCE power on City owned street lights. Coordinate with City staff for design and installation requirements. f. Foothill drive approach shall have a 20 -foot radius for the inbound right turn and a least a 31 -foot radius for the outbound right turn, with sidewalk crossing the approach close to perpendicular at the zero curb face. Right-of-way dedication shall encompass the full public sidewalk crossing . Driveway median and accent paving shall not extend into the public right-of-way. g. Entry gates shall conform to the City's Residential Project Gated Entrance design guideline. h. Provide traffic signage and striping as required including northbound and southbound left turn and through movement time restrictions on Red Hill Country Club Drive at Foothill Boulevard during the peak hours. i. Construct access ramps at the street type entrance on Foothill Boulevard to comply with current ADA requirements. A detail will have to be added to the street improvement plan showing the design details, elevations, and grades of the access ramp to substantiate they comply with current ADA requirements. www.CityofRC,us Printed: 8/23/2017 Page 7 of 20 Project #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 P420 Sycamore Heights APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10 Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Variance, and Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 2. Provide the fair share contribution for the Year 2035 as stated in the project traffic impact study for Foothill Boulevard at San Bernardino Road. Ultimate improvements include construction of a 3rd westbound and a 3rd eastbound through lane, restriping the northbound shared left turn/through lane into a shared left turn/through/right turn lane and modifications to the traffic signal. 3. Make a in -lieu contribution for a prorated share of the cost of the future improvements along the project frontage, to the future centerline of Foothill Boulevard. Final construction cost estimate to be approved by the City Engineer. 4. Red Hilf Country Club Drive shall be improved in accordance with the City's "Local Street" standards along the project frontage. a. Provide curb and gutter, asphalt pavement, sidewalk, street trees and a drive approach for emergency vehicle access on the east side of the existing street. b. Drive approach for emergency vehicle access on Red Hill Country Club Drive shall be installed per Standard Drawing 105-C, with thicker concrete or reinforced sidewalk to meet Fire District standards. c. Provide a minimum 6 -foot curb adjacent sidewalk width. Install retaining walls as needed. d. Provide 5800 Lumen HPSV-equivalent LED streetlights along the frontage. The street lights shall be owned by the City. Developer shall be responsible to coordinate and pay all costs to provide SCE power on City owned street lights. Coordinate with City staff for design and installation requirements. e. Provide traffic signage and striping as required. 5. Parkways shall slope at 2 percent from 1 foot behind the sidewalk to the top of the curb, along all street frontages. 6. Dedicate Lots A, B and C from the approved Tentative Map to the City. 7. Provide a copy of the on-site landscaping plans for Engineering Services Department review regarding conformance with Foothill Boulevard beautification master plan. 8. Add the following note to any private landscape plans that show street trees; "All improvements within the public right-of-way, including street trees, shall be installed per the public improvement plans". if there is a discrepancy between the public and private plans, the street improvement plans will govern. Printed: 8/23/2017 Page 8 of 20 www.CltyofRC.us Project #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: SUBT T 16605iM, 0RC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 P421 Sycamore Heights APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10 Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Variance, and Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 9. Extend Master Plan Storm Drain Line III -1 from Foothill Boulevard to Red Hill Country Club Drive. The applicant shall submit a detailed hydrology study to engineering and said study shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of a Building Permit, whichever occurs first. Said study shall include the existing, interim and the ultimate proposed hydrologic conditions including key elevations, drainage patterns and proposed locations and sizes of all existing and proposed drainage devices. The hydrology study shall present a full breakdown of all the runoff generated on- and off-site. If there are any impacts to the downstream channel, the City will require full installation of the Master Plan Storm Drain culvert, south of Foothill Boulevard, along with any right-of-way acquisition and easements that may be required. Standard drainage fees for the site shall be credited to the cost of permanent master plan facilities, in accordance with City Policy. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover over sizing costs, in excess of fees from future development within the same tributary area. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within six months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. a. Construct private, on-site storm drains to collect all project runoff, and discharges from adjacent properties to the north and convey to the Master Plan Storm Drain. b. Provide manholes at public-private junctions. 10. Maintenance access shall be granted to the City for the on-site portion of the master plan storm drain. All manholes shall be easily accessible. 11. Private drainage facilities shall prevent developed flows from entering the Pacific Electric Trail right-of-way. Existing inlet facilities for culverts in the SBCTA right-of-way shall be protected. Final drainage study shall address whether those culverts can be used for runoff from perimeter slopes or undeveloped portions of the project site. Also, surface drainage shall not flow over City right-of-way or maintained areas. Provide intercept of surface drainage such as by use of v -gutters and provide for drainage to enter street through parkway culverts. 12. The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) fronting the project site shall be removed or placed underground, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. All services crossing Foothill Boulevard and/or Red Hill Country Club Drive shall be undergrounded at the same time. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development (or redevelopment) as it occurs on the opposite side of the street. If the developer fails to submit said reimbursement agreement within six months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. a. All existing overhead utilities located on site shall be removed or placed underground. Printed:. 8/23/2017 www.CityofRC.us Page 9 of 20 Project #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: SUE3TT i 6605M, DRC2.012-00672, 0RC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 P422 Sycamore Heights APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10 Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Variance, and Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 13. It shall be the developer's responsibility to have the current FIRM Zone A designation removed from the project area. The developer shall provide drainage/or flood protection facilities sufficient to obtain an unshaded "X" designation. The developer's engineer shall prepare all necessary reports, plans, hydrologic/hydraulic calculations. A Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) shall be required prior to grading permits. A Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) shall be issued by FEMA prior to certificate of occupancy. 14. Master Plan Storm Drain Line III -1 shall be constructed and aligned so that it remains within the developer's property before connecting into the existing storm drain in the Foothill Boulevard right-of-way. A permanent storm drain easement shall be granted to the City for the public storm drain lines within the developer's property prior to acceptance of the improvements. As an alternative option to constructing the storm drain line and securing easements within the developer's property., at its sole cost and expense, the developer may voluntarily obtain a perpetual easement through the property located at 8318 Foothill Boulevard (Sycamore Inn) for such storm drain lines. Should the developer not obtain the necessary easement prior to the fling of the final map with the City, this alternative option shall be void and the developer shall construct the storm drain lines exclusively within the developer's property. Standard Conditions of Approval 15. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 16. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. www.CityofRC.us Printed; 8123!2017 Page 10 of 20 Project#: • SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 P423 Project Name: Sycamore Heights Location: APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Variance, and Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 17. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals- and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3 -inch pvc with pull rope or as specified. e. The proposed development is slated to be included in the City's Fiber Optic / Broadband service business plan that would provide a City owned Fiber -to -the -Premise (FTTP) infrastructure. Proposed fiber optic conduits and vaults will be placed underground within a duct and structure system to be installed by the Master Developer per Standard Drawing 135-137. The size, placement and location of the conduit and vaults shall be shown on the Street Improvement and/or Public Improvement Plans and subject to the Engineering Services Department's review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or final map approval, whichever comes first. f. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per latest ADA standards or as directed by the City Engineer. - g. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. h. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards. i. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to submittal for first plan check. 18. Street trees, a minimum of 15 -gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. Printed: 8/23/2017 Page 11 of 20 www.CityofRC.us Project #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 P424 Sycamore Heights APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10 Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Variance, and Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 19. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating : "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Foothill Boulevard in ROW and Median Botanical Name - Prunus blireina Common Name - N.C.N. Min. Grow Space - 3' Spacing - 20' O.C. Size -15 gallon Foothill Boulevard On-site Botanical Name - Platanus acerifolia Common Name - London Plane Tree Min. Grow Space - 7' Spacing - 40' O.C. Size - 15 gallon Red Hill Country Club Drive Botanical Name - Platanus acerifolia Common Name - London Plane Tree Min. Grow Space - 7' Spacing - 40' O.C. Size - 15 gallon Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 20. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. 21. Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective Beautification Master Plan: Foothill Boulevard www.CityofRC.us Printed; 8/23/2017 Page 12 of 20 Project #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: SUB T T16605M, DRC2012-00672, 0RC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 P425 Sycamore Heights APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10 Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Variance, and Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 22. Provide separate utility services to each building including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 23. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 24. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 25. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. 26. Permits shall be obtained from the following agencies for work within their right of way: San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA) 27. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Permits issued on or after June 2, 2014, must complete the reimbursement process through the City's Accelerate online portal within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project or the deposit will be forfeited. Permits issued before June 2, 2014, require the following when. applying for a deposit reimbursement: a completed CD -2 form, a copy of the cashier's receipt showing the deposit amount, and all weight tickets. Instructions and forms are available at the City's web site, www.CityofRC.us, under City Hall; Engineering; Environmental Programs. 28. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval. 29. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. 30. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline): 60 total feet on Foothill Boulevard 30 total feet on Red Hill Country Club Drive 31. All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be quit -claimed or delineated on the final map. 32. Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum of 7 feet measured from the face of curbs to the right-of-way. 33. Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk. Printed: 8/23/2017 Page 13 of 20 www.CityofRC.us Project #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: SUB T T 16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 P426 Sycamore Heights APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10 Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Variance, and Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 34. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all common roads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to, or concurrent with the final map. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout "Information for Grading Plans and Permit". 2. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code and/or the California Residential Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 3. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 4. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 5. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 6. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. 7. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. All dust control sign (s) shall be located outside of the public right of way. 8. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, the rough grading plan shall be a separate plan submittal and permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 9. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall(s) on property line(s) or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 10. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show the accessibility path from the public right of way and the accessibility parking stalls to the building doors in conformance with the current adopted California Building Code. All accessibility ramps shall show sufficient detail including gradients, elevations, and dimensions and comply with the current adopted California Building Code. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 8/23/2017 Page 14 of 20 Project #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: SUB T T 16605iM, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 P427 Sycamore Heights APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10 Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Variance, and Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 11. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on-site construction where possible, and shall provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 12. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the grading plan shall show that all manufactured slopes shall be a minimum 2 -foot offset from the public right of way, permitted line, or the adjacent private property. All slope offsets shall meet the requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 13. Prior to the issuance of a grading plan for multi -family projects, the private streets and drive aisles within multi -family developments shall include street plans aspart of the Grading and Drainage Plan set. The private street plan view shall show typical street sections. The private street profile view shall show the private street/drive aisle centerline. 14. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the grading and drainage plan shall show the maximum parking stall gradient at 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code. 15. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 16. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100 -feet beyond project boundary. 17. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 18. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre -grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre -grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: I) The bottom of the over -excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record, iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 19. All roof drainage flowing to the public right of way (Foothill Boulevard) must drain under the sidewalk through a parkway culvert approved by the Engineering Department. This shall be shown on both the grading and drainage plan and Engineering Services Department required plans. Printed; 8/23/2417 Page 15 of 20 www,CityofRC.us Project : Project Name: Location: Project Type: SUB7 i 16605tM, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 P428 Sycamore Heights APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10 Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Variance, and Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 20. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the permitted grading plan (or architectural site plan) set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC1804.3/CRC R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.21CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted California Building Code/Residential Code, 21. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall obtain a signed and notarized letter from the adjacent property owner(s) for ALL work proposed on the adjacent property. The letter shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set. The letter shall show on either the title sheet or a detail sheet of the grading and drainage plan set. 22. Prior to approval of the project -specific storm water quality management plan, the applicant shall submit to the Building Official, or his designee, a precise grading plan showing the location and elevations of existing topographical features, and showing the location and proposed elevations of proposed structures and drainage of the site. 23. A drainage study showing a 100 -year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. The report shall contain water surface profile gradient calculations for all storm drain pipes 12 -inches and larger in diameter. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. In addition, the project specific drainage study shall provide inlet calculations showing the proper sizing of the water quality management plan storm water flows into the proposed structural storm water treatment devices. 24. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 25.1t shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage acceptance easements(s) from adjacent downstream property owner(s) or discharge flows in a natural condition (concentrated flows are not accepted) and shall provide the Building and Safety Official a drainage study showing the proposed flows do not exceed the existing flows prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. 26. Roof water is not permitted to flow over the public parkway and shall be directed to an under parkway culvert per City of Rancho Cucamonga requirements prior to issuance of a grading permit. 27. Flow lines steeper than 6 percent could be erosive. The applicant shall provide hard lined gutters and swales where concentrated flows exceed 3fps, and anywhere that flow lines exceed 10 percent. This shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan prior to issuance of a grading permit. Printed: 8/23/2017 Page 16 of 20 www.Cityo(RC.us Project #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: SuBTT 16605!vI, DRC2012-00672, DRC2U 16-00207, and 0RC20 i 2-00673 P429 Sycamore Heights APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10 Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Variance, and Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 28. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall demonstrate that the storm water run-off will not adversely affect the downstream properties and that the water may legally discharge to the downstream properties. The engineer of record shall show on the final permitted grading and drainage plan one (1) or more of the following items are met: a) There is sufficient downstream capacity to accept the proposed storm water flows and that the downstream property owner have provided permission to accept the upstream storm water flows; b) a legal document/entity exists allowing developed storm water flows to be discharged to the property lower in elevation; c) a storm drain system to safely convey the storm water flows to a public storm drain system without causing flooding to adjacent property(ies). 29. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the latest adopted California Plumbing Code. Private storm drain improvements shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan. 30. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy or final sign off by the Building Inspector the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) storm water treatment devices and best management practices (BMP). 31. Prior to approval of the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), the WQMP shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 32. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment devices and best management practices (BMP) as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan, shall be provided for by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the approval of the Water Quality Management Plan. Said CC&R's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. 33. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the grading and drainage plan shall show concrete drainage swales at the toe of slopes and discharge the water to an approved drainage facility. 34. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 35. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID). The WDID number shall also be shown on the WQMP Site and Drainage Plan document. 36. The applicant shall provide a copy of a completed EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) for each underground infiltration device, with the Facility ID Number assigned, to the Building and Safety Services Department Official prior to issuance of the Grading Permit and/or approval of the project -specific Water Quality Management Plan. A copy of EPA Form 7520-16 shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set, and a copy of said form shall be included in the project -specific Water Quality Management Plan. vww.CityofRC.us Printed; 8/23/2017 Page 17 of 20 Project Name: Location: Project Type: SUB T T16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 P430 Sycamore Heights APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10 Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Variance, and Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 37. The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for the Class V Injection Wells/underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 38. The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the structural storm water treatment devices, commonly referred to as BMPs, to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 39. The land/property owner shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a biennial basis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. 40. A final project -specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be approved by the Building and Safety Director, or his designee, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit or any building permit. 41. Prior to the start of landscaping operations, the landscape architect and the landscape contractor shall provide a sample of the weed fabric barrier to the Project Planner, City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The weed barrier shall be permeable. 42. The final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP) shall include executed maintenance agreements along with the maintenance guidelines for all proprietary structural storm water treatment devices (BMP's). In the event the applicant cannot get the proprietary device maintenance agreements executed prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant is required to submit a letter to be included within the WQMP document, and scanned and pasted onto the Site and Drainage Plan which states that prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy with applicant shall enter into a contract for the maintenance of the proprietary storm water treatment device. If the proprietary storm water treatment device is part of a residential subdivision, prior to the sale of the residential lot, the developer shall include maintenance agreements) as part of the sale of the residential lot to the buyer. A copy of the maintenance agreements to be included in the sale of the property shall be included within the WQMP document. 43. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the project specific water quality management plan all private storm water catch basin inlets shall include insert filters to capture those pollutants of concern as addressed in the in the final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP). At a minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris. All catch basin insert filters shall be maintained on a regular basis as described in the "Inspection and Maintenance Responsibility for Post Construction BMP" section of the final project -specific water quality management plan. Printed: 8/2312017 Page 18 of 20 www.CityofRC.us Projeci #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: SUS i 1i6o05M, 0RC2012-G06672, Di -C2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 P431 Sycamore Heights APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10 Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Variance, and Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 44. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project -Specific Water Quality Management Plan shall include a completed copy of "Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet" located in Appendix D "Section VII — Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety Recommendations, ..." of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans. The infiltration study shall include the Soil Engineer's recommendations for Appendix D, Table V11.3: Suitability Assessment Related Considerations for infiltration Facility Safety Factors". 45. Prior to approval of the final project -specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project -specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". 46. The subject project, shall accept all existing off-site storm water drainage flows and safely convey those flows through or around the project site. If existing off-site storm water drainage flows mix with any on-site storm water drainage flows, then the off-site storm water drainage flows shall be treated with the on-site storm water drainage flows for storm water quality purposes, prior to discharging the storm water drainage flows from the project site. 47. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the Building Official, or his designee, the civil engineer of record shall file a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Post Construction Storm Water Treatment Devices As -Built Certificate with the Environmental Programs Coordinator, City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Services Department. 48. As the use of drywells are proposed for the structural storm water treatment device, to meet the infiltration requirements of the current Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Systems (MS4) Permit, adequate source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration shall be evaluated prior to infiltration and discussed in the final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan document. Printed: 812312017 Page 19 of 20 www.CityofRC.us Project r: Project Name: Location: Project Type: jIJD 1 T166u5M, E.); (:2C112 -u 072, LJ- C2010 -C 20 , ana GAO -2012-30673 P432 Sycamore Heights APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10 Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Variance, and Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 49. GROUND WATER PROTECTION: Prior to approval of the final project specific water quality management plan (WQMP), the WQMP document shall meet the requirements of the State Water Resources Control Board Order No. R8-2010-0036 (NPDES No. CAS 618036), the San Bernardino County Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Separation (MS4) Permit reads: Section XI.D(Water Quality Management Plan Requirements).8(Groundwater Protection): Treatment Control BMPs utilizing infiltration [exclusive of incidental infiltration and BMPs not designed to primarily function as infiltration devices (such as grassy swales, detention basins, vegetated buffer strips, constructed wetlands, etc.)] must comply with the following minimum requirements to protect groundwater: a. Use of structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause or contribute to an exceedance of ground water quality objectives. b. Source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration should be evaluated prior to infiltration. c. Adequate pretreatment of runoff prior to infiltration shall be required in gas stations and large commercial parking lots. (NOTE: The State Water Quality Control Board defines a large commercial parking lot as `100,000 sq. ft. or more of commercial development to include parking lot (with 100 or more vehicle traffics), OR, by means of 5,000sgft or more of allowable space designated for parking purposes'). d. Unless adequate pre-treatment of runoff is provided prior to infiltration structural infiltration treatment BMPs must not be used for areas of industrial or light industrial activity{77}, areas subject to high vehicular traffic (25,000 or more daily traffic); car washes; fleet storage areas; nurseries; or any other high threat to water quality land uses or activities. e. Class V injection wells or dry wells must not be placed in areas subject to vehicular{78} repair or maintenance activities{79}, such as an auto body repair shop, automotive repair shop, new and used car dealership, specialty repair shop (e.g., transmission and muffler repair shop) or any facility that does any vehicular repair work. f. Structural infiltration BMP treatment shall not be used at sites that are known to have soil and groundwater contamination. g. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall be located at least 100 feet horizontally from any water supply wells. h. The vertical distance from the bottom of any infiltration structural treatment BMP to the historic high groundwater mark shall be at least 10 -feet. Where the groundwater basins do not support beneficial uses, this vertical distance criteria may be reduced, provided groundwater quality is maintained. i. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause a nuisance or pollution as defined in Water Code Section 13050. The final project -specific water quality management plan shall specifically address items, a ., b., and c. above. www.cityofRC.uS Printed: 8123/2017 Page 20 of 20 P433 RESOLUTION NO. 17-79 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TREE REMOVAL PERMIT NO. DRC2012-00673, A REQUEST TO REMOVE 180 TREES ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF 175 ATTACHED CONDOMINIUM UNITS ON 24.19 ACRES OF LAND IN MIXED USE (MU) DISTRICT, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, BETWEEN RED HILL COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE AND THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC TRAIL RIGHT-OF-WAY; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, AND 41 AND 0207-112-09 AND 10. A. Recitals. 1. Pacific Summit -Foothill, LLC, filed an application for the approval of Tree Removal Permit No. DRC2012-00673, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tree Removal Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 9th day of August 2017, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and continued the application to the August 23, 2017 Planning Commission meeting. 3. On the 23rd day of August 2017, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced meeting on August 23, 2017, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The project site contains approximately 24.19 acres of a generally irregular configuration having a topography with a 30 percent or greater slope, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between Red Hill Country Club Drive and the Pacific Electric Trail, and is presently vacant; and b. The project site is located in the Mixed Use (MU) District; and c. The property to the north contains Condominiums and single-family homes in the Medium (M) Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and Low (L) Residential District (2- 4 dwelling units per acre), the property to the south contains office, commercial, and condominiums uses in the Mixed Use (MU) District and Medium (M) Residential District (8-14 Attachment 6 P434 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-79 TRP DRC2012-00673 -- PACIFIC SUMMIT -FOOTHILL, LLC August 23, 2017 Page 2 dwelling units per acre), the property to the east contains Route 66 Trailhead and condominiums in the Medium (M) Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre), the property to the west contains commercial land uses in the Mixed Use (MU) District, and the proposed project surrounds the Sycamore Inn Restaurant in the Mixed Use (MU) District; and d. The trees are not designated as historically significant; and e. The trees are not noted in any Specific Plan/Community Pian or condition of approval; and f. The applicant has submitted an arborist report assessing the health of the individual trees. The Arborist Report (Jim Borer, August 2012) evaluated a total of 198 trees on the project site. Of those 198 trees, 64 meet Development Code criteria to be classified as Heritage Trees, and 18 of those Heritage Trees are recommended for preservation. The 180 trees not identified by the Arborist Report as suitable for preservation are considered over -mature, have poor growth character, have advanced decay, some are dead or are in poor general health; many of these trees have further declined in health due to the prolonged effects of the drought. Additionally, several trees, although in good health, their location conflicts with proposed improvements and the applicant proposes to remove these trees; and g. It is necessary to remove the trees in order to construct improvements which allow economic enjoyment of the property; and h. There are a significant number of trees existing in the neighborhood; the removal does not affect the established character of the area; and i. It is necessary to remove the trees to construct required improvements within the public street right-of-way or within a flood control or utility right-of-way; and j. The trees can not be preserved by pruning and proper maintenance or relocation rather than removal; however, 2 trees (Borer Report, Trees No. 76 and 175) may be suitable candidates for relocation; and k. The trees do not constitute a significant natural resource of the City. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and b. The proposed project is in accord with the objectives of the Municipal Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and c. The proposed project is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and d. The proposed project, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. P435 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-79 TRP DRC2012-00673 — PACIFIC SUMMIT -FOOTHILL, LLC August 23, 2017 Page 3 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. A comment letter was received from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) on July 27, 2017 in response to the circulated IS/MND. The only comment CDFW had was in relation to the possible Jurisdictional Waters on the project site. The applicant and their biologists prepared a Jurisdictional Delineation to address CDFW's comments. The Jurisdictional Delineation determined that jurisdictional waters were not present on the project site, but recommended compliance with the CDFW recommended mitigation measure prior to issuance of any grading permit. The Biological Resources section of the IS/MND, was revised to include a mitigation measure requiring the applicant to provide proof to the City that the Streambed Alteration Agreement (1602 Agreement) process has been concluded. According to CEQA Section 15073.5(a), recirculation of a negative declaration is required prior to its adoption when it has been substantially revised after public notice of its availability has been given pursuant to Section 15072. Furthermore, CEQA Section 15073.5(b) states, "a "substantial revision" of the negative declaration shall mean: (1) a new avoidable significant effect is identified and mitigation measure or project revisions must be added in order to reduce the effect to insignificance, or (2) the lead agency determines that the proposed mitigation measures or project revisions will not reduce potential effects to less than significance and new measures or revisions must be required." Here, either the CDFW will determine that notification under Section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code is required for the project, or they will require the applicant obtain a Streambed Alteration Agreement. The IS/MND was revised to include a discussion of the Jurisdictional Delineation for the project site and a mitigation measure requiring a Streambed Alteration Agreement was added to the MND and the project conditions of approval. The addition of a condition of approval requiring a Streambed Alteration Agreement is not considered substantial evidence in light of the whole record that cannot be mitigated. Therefore, the Streambed Alteration Agreement mitigation measure is not a substantial revision to the MND, and recirculation of the MND is not required; and b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby recommends the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration; and P436 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-79 TRP DRC2012-00673 — PACIFIC SUMMIT -FOOTHILL, LLC August 23, 2017 Page 4 c. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore recommends the City Council adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project; and d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's recommendation is based is the City Planner of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) All Conditions of Approval as contained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 17-75 shall apply. 2) The following trees, as identified in the Arborist Report (Jim Borer, August 2012), shall be preserved in place: Trees No. 74, 81, 82, 95, 96, 97, 99, 100, 101, 111, 112, 118, 120, 128, 129, 143, 178, and 185. The trees identified for preservation shall be identified on-site prior to removal of the remaining trees and shalt be protected during all phases of construction. 3) The following trees, as identified in the Arborist Report (Jim Borer, August 2012), shall be either transplanted elsewhere on-site or replaced with the largest nursery grown stock available: Trees No. 76, and 175. The replacement tree shall be of the same species and the trees removed and shall be subject to Planning Department review and approval prior to planting. 4) The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code requires that all heritage trees be replaced on a one-for-one basis, in the largest nursery grown stock available, and not less than a 15 -gallon size. 5) This permit shall be valid for a period of 90 days, unless an extension is requested in writing at least 14 days prior to the expiration date. Where this permit is associated with development, the effective date begins and the 90 days shall start from the date of final map recordation or building permit issuance, whichever comes first. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. P437 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-79 TRP DRC2012-00673 -- PACIFIC SUMMIT -FOOTHILL, LLC August 23, 2017 Page 5 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF AUGUST 2017. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: ATTEST: Francisco Oaxaca, Chairman Candyce urnett, Secretary 1, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 23rd day of August 2017, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, OAXACA, WIMBERLY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MACIAS, MUNOZ ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: NONE Conditions of Approval Community Development Department Project #: SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 P438 Project Name: Sycamore Heights Location: APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Variance, and Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Approval is for the subdivision of 24.19 acres into 6 parcels and for the development of 175 attached condominium units in the Mixed Use (MU) District located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between Red Hill Country Club Drive and Pacific Electric Trail Right -of -Way 2. Provide additional parking spaces in the vicinity of the LivefWork units to ensure adequate parking is available for commercial uses. 3. Provide a pedestrian connection to the Pacific Electric Trail along the east side of the project site, subject to approval by the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA). 4. Provide additional landscaping adjacent to the project perimeter wall to the northwest of the Sycamore Inn. 5. For slope planting south of the existing residences along the project's north boundary utilize a tree species and spacing that protects the views of homeowners living north of the project site. Standard Conditions of Approval 6. For all residential development, provide conduit from each unit/lot and a pull box to connect to the street. Provide interior structured wiring for each house/building with minimum Category 5 copper wire, Radio Grade 6 coaxial cable, and a central distribution panel, prior to release of occupancy (fiber -to -the building, FTTB). Plans shall be submitted for Planning Department and Building Official review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. 7. All dwellings shall have the front, side and rear elevations upgraded with architectural treatment, detailing and increased delineation of surface treatment subject to Planning Department review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. 8. AH roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections shall be screened from all sides and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent properties and streets. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Department. Any roof -mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically more than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet, shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent nature with the building design and is detailed consistent with the building. Any roof -mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically Tess than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet shall be painted consistent with the color scheme of the building. Details shall be included in building plans. Printed 8f23/2017 www.CityofRC us Project #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 P439 Sycamore Heights APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10 Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Variance, and Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 9. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Department in the amount of $767 prior to the issuance of Building Permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. 10. In those instances requiring long term monitoring (i.e. beyond final certificate of occupancy), the applicant shall provide a written monitoring and reporting program to the Planning Department prior to issuance of Building Permits. Said program shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. 11. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the City Adopted Special Studies Zone for the Red Hill Fault, in a standard format as determined by the Planning Department, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 12. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 13. Approval of Tentative Tract SUBTT16605 Modification is granted subject to the approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2016-00206, Design Review DRC2012-00672, Variance DRC2016-00207, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2012-00673. 14. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolutions of Approval, Conditions of Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). This includes Planning Commission Resolution No.'s 17-76 (for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16606M), 17-77 (for Design Review DRC2012-00672), 17-78 (for Variance DRC2016-00207), and 17-79 (for Tree Removal Permit DRC2012-00673). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 15. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption and Mitigated Negative Declaration fee in the amount of $2,266.25. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing. 16. Tentative Tract 16605 Modification shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the Engineering Services Department within 3 years from the date of the approval. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 8/23/2017 Page 2 of 20 Project #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, 0RC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 P440 Sycamore Heights APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10 Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Variance, and Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 17. For multi -family residential, property owners are responsible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. 18. Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in accordance with the Development Code Section 17.80.050, and so noted on the grading plans. The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans. The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods. 19. Front yard and corner side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be required per the Development Code. This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting. 20. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Department review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. For development occurring in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, the landscape plans will also be reviewed by Fire Construction Services. 21. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 22. All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than 2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 23. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15 -gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1 -gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5 -gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer. prior to occupancy. 24. Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees, meandering sidewalks, and intensified landscaping, is required along Foothill Boulevard. 25. Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for Planning Department review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. These criteria shall encourage the natural growth characteristics of the selected tree species. 26. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water efficient landscaping per Development. Code Chapter 17.82. www.CitycARC.us Printed: 8/23/2017 Page 3 of 20 Project #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 P441 Sycamore Heights APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10 Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Variance, and Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 27. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes. Multi -family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to Planning Department review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 28. All units shall be provided with garage door openers if driveways are less than 18 feet in depth from back of sidewalk. 29. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet. 30. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 17 feet long with a required 1 -foot overhang (e.g., over a curb stop). Parallel parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 24 feet long. 31. Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the Planning Department, City Engineer, and Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. For residential development, private gated entrances shall provide adequate turn -around space in front of the gate and a separate visitor lane with call box to avoid cars stacking into the public right-of-way. 32. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. 33. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/plazas/ recreational uses. 34. Access gates to the rear yards shall be constructed from a material more durable than wood gates. Acceptable materials include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC. 35. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 36. Construct block walls between homes (i.e., along interior side and rear property lines), rather than wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency. 37. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination and in conformance with Building and Safety Services Department standards, the Municipal Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department (RCFD) Standards. 38. The site shall be developed arid maintained in accordance with 'the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and Development Code regulations. 39. All ground -mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. www.CityofRC.us Printed. 8/23/2017 Page 4 cf 20 Project #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 P442 Sycamore Heights APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10 Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Variance, and Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 40. A uniform hardscape and street furniture design including seating benches, trash receptacles, free-standing potted plants, bike racks, light bollards, etc., shall be utilized and be compatible with the architectural style. Detailed designs shall be submitted for Planning Department review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 41. On corner side yards, provide minimum 5 -foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk. The 5 -foot wall/fence setback and the parkway shall have landscape and irrigation in addition to the required street trees. Detailed landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning Department review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. The parkway landscaping including trees, shrubs, ground covers and irrigation shall be maintained by the property owner. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the parkway maintenance requirement, in a standard format as determined by the Planning Department, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 42. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Department and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 43. For multiple -family development, laundry facilities shall be provided as required by the Development Code. 44. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department and Police Department (909-477-2800) prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 45. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Services Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance and final acceptance granted prior to occupancy. 46. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 47. Prior to any use of• the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Department. 48. Revised Site Plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Planning Department review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 49. Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock. Other stone veneers may be manufactured products. 50. Street names shall be submitted for Planning Department review and approval in accordance with the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map www•CityafRC.us Printed: 8i23/2017 Page 5 a'20 Project #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 P443 Sycamore Heights APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10 Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Variance, and Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 51. If no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-up shall be far individual units with all receptacles shielded from public view. 52. Any approval for Design Review DRC2012-00672, Variance DRC2016-00207, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2012-00673 shall expire if Building Permits are not issued within 5 years from the date of approval, or a time extension has been granted. 53. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Services Department. 54. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building. 55. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Services Department. 56. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions shall restrict the storage of recreational vehicles on this site unless they are the principal source of transportation for the owner and prohibit parking on interior circulation aisles other than in designated visitor parking areas. 57. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Services Department and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer. The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Department a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes. 58. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. 59. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owners at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/fences along the project perimeter. 60. Slope fencing along side property lines may be wrought iron or black plastic coated chain link to maintain an open feeling and enhance views. Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions www.CityofRC.us Printed: 8/23/2017 Page 6 of 20 Project #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00572, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 P444 Sycamore Heights APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10 Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Variance, and Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Foothill Boulevard shall be improved in accordance with the City's "Major Divided Arterial" standards along the entire project frontage. a. Parkway improvements, including special streetlights, street trees and sidewalk, shall conform to the Foothill Boulevard District guidelines outlined in the Development Code and the Route 66/Foothill Boulevard Visual improvement Plan. b. Complete parkway improvements on the north side between the Pacific Electric Trail bridge and the adjacent Sycamore Inn property. City has already installed the curb and gutter. Add parkway improvements including sidewalk, street trees, streetlights and curbside drain outlets, per Standard Drawing 107-6 or 107-C as needed. c. Right turn lane, per Standard Drawing 119 (Bus Bay -Right Turn Lane option), shall be at least 150 feet in length with a 60 -foot transition. The right turn lane shall be based off existing Foothill Boulevard elevations. d. Provide an interim physical barrier (at the project entrance) to left turns to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. e. Provide 8,600 Lumen LED streetlights. The street lights shall be owned by the City. Developer shall be responsible to coordinate and pay all costs to provide SCE power on City owned street lights. Coordinate with City staff for design and installation requirements. f. Foothill drive approach shall have a 20 -foot radius for the inbound right turn and a least a 31 -foot radius for the outbound right turn, with sidewalk crossing the approach close to perpendicular at the zero curb face. Right-of-way dedication shall encompass the full public sidewalk crossing . Driveway median and accent paving shall not extend into the public right-of-way. g. Entry gates shall conform to the City's Residential Project Gated Entrance design guideline. h. Provide traffic signage and striping as required including northbound and southbound left turn and through movement time restrictions on Red Hill Country Club Drive at Foothill Boulevard during the peak hours. i. Construct access ramps at the street type entrance on Foothill Boulevard to comply with current ADA requirements. A detail will have to be added to the street improvement plan showing the design details, elevations, and grades of the access ramp to substantiate they comply with current ADA requirements. www•CityofRC.us Printed: 8123I2017 Page 7 of 20 Project #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: SUBTT16605M, 0RC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 P445 Sycamore Heights APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10 Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Variance, and Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 2. Provide the fair share contribution for the Year 2035 as stated in the project traffic impact study for Foothill Boulevard at San Bernardino Road. Ultimate improvements include construction of a 3rd westbound and a 3rd eastbound through lane, restriping the northbound shared.left turn/through lane into a shared left turn/through/right turn lane and modifications to the traffic signal. 3. Make a in -lieu contribution for a prorated share of the cost project frontage, to the future centerline of Foothill Boulevard. approved by the City Engineer. 4. Red Hill Country Club Drive shall be improved in accordance along the project frontage. of the future improvements along the Final construction cost estimate to be with the City's "Local Street' standards a. Provide curb and gutter, asphalt pavement, sidewalk, street trees and a drive approach for emergency vehicle access on the east side of the existing street. b. Drive approach for emergency vehicle access on Red Hill Country Club Drive shall be installed per Standard Drawing 105-C, with thicker concrete or reinforced sidewalk to meet Fire District standards. c. Provide a minimum 6 -foot curb adjacent sidewalk width. Install retaining walls as needed. d. Provide 5800 Lumen HPSV-equivalent LED streetlights along the frontage. The street lights shall be owned by the City. Developer shall be responsible to coordinate and pay all costs to provide SCE power on City owned street lights. Coordinate with City staff for design and installation requirements. e. Provide traffic signage and striping as required. 5. Parkways shall slope at 2 percent from 1 foot behind the sidewalk to the street frontages. 6. Dedicate Lots A, B and C from the approved Tentative Map to the City. 7. Provide a copy of the on-site landscaping plans for Engineering Services regarding conformance with Foothill Boulevard beautification master plan. 8. Add the following note to any private landscape plans that show street trees; within the public right-of-way, including street trees, shall be installed per the plans". If there is a discrepancy between the public and private plans, the street will govern. top of the curb, along all Printed'. 8123/2017 www.CityofRC.us Department review "All improvements public improvement improvement plans Page 8of20 Project #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, 0RC2016-00207, and 0RC2012-00673 P446 Sycamore Heights APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10 Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Variance, and Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 9. Extend Master Plan Storm Drain Line 111-1 from Foothill Boulevard to Red Hill Country Club Drive. The applicant shall submit a detailed hydrology study to engineering and said study shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of a Building Permit, whichever occurs first. Said study shall include the existing, interim and the ultimate proposed hydrologic conditions including key elevations, drainage patterns and proposed locations and sizes of all existing and proposed drainage devices. The hydrology study shall present a full breakdown of all the runoff generated on- and off-site. If there are any impacts to the downstream channel, the City will require full installation of the Master Plan Storm Drain culvert, south of Foothill Boulevard, along with any right-of-way acquisition and easements that may be required. Standard drainage fees for the site shall be credited to the cost of permanent master plan facilities, in accordance with City Policy. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover over sizing costs, in excess of fees from future development within the same tributary area. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within six months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. a. Construct private, on-site storm drains to collect all project runoff, and discharges from adjacent properties to the north and convey to the Master Plan Storm Drain. b. Provide manholes at public-private junctions. 10. Maintenance access shall be granted to the City for the on-site portion of the master plan storm drain. All manholes shall be easily accessible. 11. Private drainage facilities shall prevent developed flows from entering the Pacific Electric Trail right-of-way. Existing inlet facilities for culverts in the SBCTA right-of-way shall be protected. Final drainage study shall address whether those culverts can be used for runoff from perimeter slopes or undeveloped portions of the project site. Also, surface drainage shall not flow over City right-of-way or maintained areas. Provide intercept of surface drainage such as by use of v -gutters and provide for drainage to enter street through parkway culverts. 12. The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) fronting the project site shall be removed or placed underground, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. Ali services crossing Foothill Boulevard and/or Red Hill Country Club Drive shall be undergrounded at the same time. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development (or redevelopment) as it occurs on the opposite side of the street. If the developer fails to submit said reimbursement agreement within six months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. a. All existing overhead utilities located on site shall be removed or placed underground. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 8/23/2017 Page 9 of 20 Project #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: SUBTT1660511/1, DRC2012-00072, 0RC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 P447 Sycamore Heights APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10 Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Variance, and Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 13. It shall be the developer's responsibility to have the current FIRM Zone A designation removed from the project area. The developer shall provide drainage/or flood protection facilities sufficient to obtain an unshaded "X" designation. The developer's engineer shall prepare all necessary reports, plans, hydrologic/hydraulic calculations. A Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) shall be required prior to grading permits. A Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) shall be issued by FEMA prior to certificate of occupancy. 14. Master Plan Storm Drain Line III -1 shall be constructed and aligned so that it remains within the developer's property before connecting into the existing storm drain in the Foothill Boulevard right-of-way. A permanent storm drain easement shall be granted to the City for the public storm drain lines within the developer's property prior to acceptance of the improvements. As an alternative option to constructing the storm drain line and securing easements within the developer's property, at its sole cost and expense, the developer may voluntarily obtain a perpetual easement through the property located at 8318 Foothill Boulevard (Sycamore Inn) for such storm drain lines. Should the developer not obtain the necessary easement prior to the filing of the final map with the City, this alternative option shall be void and the developer shall construct the storm drain lines exclusively within the developer's property. Standard Conditions of Approval 15. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 16. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. in no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. Printed:BI2312017 www.CityaRC.us Page 10 of 20 Project #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: SIJBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 P448 Sycamore Heights APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10 Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Variance, and Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 17. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3 -inch pvc with pull rope or as specified. e. The proposed development is slated to be included in the City's Fiber Optic / Broadband service business plan that would provide a City owned Fiber -to -the -Premise (FTTP) infrastructure. Proposed fiber optic conduits and vaults will be placed underground within a duct and structure system to be installed by the Master Developer per Standard Drawing 135-137. The size, placement and location of the conduit and vaults shall be shown on the Street Improvement and/or Public Improvement Plans and subject to the Engineering Services Department's review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or final map approval, whichever comes first. f. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on al! corners of intersections per latest ADA standards or as directed by the City Engineer. g. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. h. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards. i. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to submittal for first plan check. 18. Street trees, a minimum of 15 -gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. Printed; 8/23/2017 Page 11 of 20 www.CityofRC.us Project #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 P449 Sycamore Heights APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10 Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Variance, and Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 19. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet _ (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Foothill Boulevard in ROW and Median Botanical Name - Prunus blireina Common Name - N.C.N. Min. Grow Space - 3' Spacing - 20' O.C. Size - 15 gallon Foothill Boulevard On-site Botanical Name - Platanus acerifolia Common Name - London Plane Tree Min. Grow Space - 7' Spacing - 40' O.C. Size - 15 gallon Red Hill Country Club Drive Botanical Name - Platanus acerifolia Common Name - London Plane Tree Min. Grow Space - 7' Spacing - 40' O.C. Size - 15 gallon Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 20. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. 21. Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective Beautification Master Plan: Foothill Boulevard www.CityofRC.us Printed: 8/23/2017 Page 12 of 20 Project #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 P450 Sycamore Heights APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10 Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Variance, and Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 22. Provide separate utility services to each building including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 23. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 24. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 25. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. 26. Permits shall be obtained from the following agencies for work within their right of way: San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA) 27. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at feast 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Permits issued on or after June 2, 2014, must complete the reimbursement process through the City's Accelerate online portal within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project or the deposit will be forfeited. Permits issued before June 2, 2014, require the following when applying for a deposit reimbursement: a completed CD -2 form, a copy of the cashier's receipt showing the deposit amount, and all weight tickets. instructions and forms are available at the City's web site, www.CityofRC.us, under City Hall; Engineering; Environmental Programs. 28. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval. 29. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. 30. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline): 60 total feet on Foothill Boulevard 30 total feet on Red Hill Country Club Drive 31. All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be quit -claimed or delineated on the final map. 32. Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum of 7 feet measured from the face of curbs to the right-of-way. 33. Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk. Printed: 8/23/2017 Page 13 of 20 www.CityofRC.us Project #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: SUBT T 16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 P451 Sycamore Heights APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10 Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Variance, and Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 34. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all common roads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to, or concurrent with the final map. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout "Information for Grading Plans and Permit". 2. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code and/or the California Residential Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 3. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 4. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 5. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 6. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. 7. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. All dust control sign (s) shall be located outside of the public right of way. 8. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, the rough grading plan shall be a separate plan submittal and permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 9. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall(s) on property line(s) or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 10. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show the accessibility path from the public right of way and the accessibility parking stalls to the building doors in conformance with the current adopted California Building Code. All accessibility ramps shall show sufficient detail including gradients, elevations, and dimensions and comply with the current adopted California Building Code. Printed: 8/23/2017 Page 14 of 20 www.CityofRC.us Project; Project Name: Location: Project Type: SUBTT16605iM, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and 0RC2012-00673 P452 Sycamore Heights APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10 Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Variance, and Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 11. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on-site construction where possible, and shall provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 12. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the grading plan shall show that all manufactured slopes shall be a minimum 2 -foot offset from the public right of way, permitted line, or the adjacent private property. All slope offsets shall meet the requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 13. Prior to the issuance of a grading plan for multi -family projects, the private streets and drive aisles within multi -family developments shall include street plans as part of the Grading and Drainage Plan set. The private street plan view shall show typical street sections. The private street profile view shall show the private street/drive aisle centerline. 14. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the grading and drainage plan shall show the maximum parking stall gradient at 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code. 15. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 16. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100 -feet beyond project boundary. 17. This project shall Building Code. 18. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre -grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre -grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over -excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 19. All roof drainage flowing to the public right of way (Foothill Boulevard) must drain under the sidewalk through a parkway culvert approved by the Engineering Department. This shall be shown on both the grading and drainage plan and Engineering Services Department required plans. comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Printed: 8/23/2017 Page 15 a! 20 www.CityofRC.us Project #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 P453 Sycamore Heights APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10 Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Variance, and Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 20. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the permitted grading plan (or architectural site plan) set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC1804.31CRC R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2) and R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted California Building Code/Residential Code. 21 Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall obtain a signed and notarized letter from the adjacent property owner(s) for ALL work proposed on the adjacent property. The letter shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set. The letter shall show on either the title sheet or a detail sheet of the grading and drainage plan set. 22. Prior to approval of the project -specific storm water quality management plan, the applicant shall submit to the Building Official, or his designee, a precise grading plan showing the location and elevations of existing topographical features, and showing the location and proposed elevations of proposed structures and drainage of the site. 23. A drainage study showing a 100 -year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. The report shall contain water surface profile gradient calculations for all storm drain pipes 12 -inches and larger in diameter. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. In addition, the project specific drainage study shall provide inlet calculations showing the proper sizing of the water quality management plan storm water flows into the proposed structural storm water treatment devices. 24. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 25. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage acceptance easements(s) from adjacent downstream property owner(s) or discharge flows in a natural condition (concentrated flows are not accepted) and shall provide the Building and Safety Official a drainage study showing the proposed flows do not exceed the existing flows prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. 26. Roof water is not permitted to flow over the public parkway and shall be directed to an under parkway culvert per City of Rancho Cucamonga requirements prior to issuance of a grading permit. 27. Flow lines steeper than 6 percent could be erosive. The applicant shall provide hard lined gutters and swales where concentrated flows exceed 3fps, and anywhere that flow lines exceed 10 percent. This shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan prior to issuance of a grading permit. Panted: 8/23/2017 wvw.CityofRC.us CBC2512.1.21CRC Page 16 of 20 Project #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: SUB T T 16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 P454 Sycamore Heights APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10 Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Variance, and Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 28. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall demonstrate that the storm water run-off will not adversely affect the downstream properties and that the water may legally discharge to the downstream properties. The engineer of record shall show on the final permitted grading and drainage plan one (1) or more of the following items are met: a) There is sufficient downstream capacity to accept the proposed storm water flows and that the downstream property owner have provided permission to accept the upstream storm water flows; b) a legal document/entity exists allowing developed storm water flows to be discharged to the property lower in elevation; c) a storm drain system to safely convey the storm water flows to a public storm drain system without causing flooding to adjacent property(ies). 29. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the latest adopted California Plumbing Code. Private storm drain improvements shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan. 30. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy or final sign off by the Building Inspector the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) storm water treatment devices and best management practices (BMP). 31. Prior to approva! of the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), the WQMP shall include a of the project Conditions of Approval. 32. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment devices and best management practices (BMP) as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan, shall be provided for by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the approval of the Water Quality Management Plan. Said CC&R's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. 33. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the grading and drainage plan shall show concrete drainage swales at the toe of slopes and discharge the water to an approved drainage facility. 34. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approva[ by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 35. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID). The WDID number shall also be shown on the WQMP Site and Drainage Plan document. 36. The applicant shall provide a copy of a completed EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) for each underground infiltration device, with the Facility ID Number assigned, to the Building and Safety Services Department Official prior to issuance of the Grading Permit and/or approval of the project -specific Water Quality Management Plan. A copy of EPA Form 7520-16 shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set, and a copy of said form shall be included in the project -specific Water Quality Management Plan. copy Printed: 8/23/2017 www.CityofRC.us Page 17 of 20 Project m: Project Name: Location: Project Type: SUB T T16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and Di',C2012-00673 P455 Sycamore Heights APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10 Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Variance, and Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 37. The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for the Class V Injection Wells/underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 38. The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the structural storm water treatment devices, commonly referred to as BMPs, to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 39. The land/property owner shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a biennial basis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. 40. A final project -specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be approved by the Building and Safety Director, or his designee, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit or any building permit. 41. Prior to the start of landscaping operations, the landscape architect and the landscape contractor shall provide a sample of the weed fabric barrier to the Project Planner, City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The weed barrier shall be permeable. 42. The final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP) shall include executed maintenance agreements along with the maintenance guidelines for all proprietary structural storm water treatment devices (BMP's). In the event the applicant cannot get the proprietary device maintenance agreements executed prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant is required to submit a letter to be included within the WQMP document, and scanned and pasted onto the Site and Drainage Plan which states that prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy with applicant shall enter into a contract for the maintenance of the proprietary storm water treatment device. If the proprietary storm water treatment device is part of a residential subdivision, prior to the sale of the residential lot, the developer shall include maintenance agreement(s) as part of the sale of the residential lot to the buyer. A copy of the maintenance agreements to be included in the sale of the property shall be included within the WQMP document. 43. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the project specific water quality management plan all private storm water catch basin inlets shall include insert filters to capture those pollutants of concern as addressed in the in the final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP). At a minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris. All catch basin insert filters shall be maintained on a regular basis as described in the "Inspection and Maintenance Responsibility for Post Construction BMP" section of the final project -specific water quality management plan. Printed: 8/23(2017 uwvw.CityofRC.us Page 18 of 20 Project #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: SUBTT16605iM, DRC2012-0066672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 P456 Sycamore Heights APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10 Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Variance, and Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 44. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project -Specific Water Quality Management Plan shall include a completed copy of "Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet" located in Appendix D "Section ViI — infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety Recommendations, ..." of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans. The infiltration study shalt include the Soil Engineer's recommendations for Appendix D, Table VIi.3: Suitability Assessment Related Considerations for infiltration Facility Safety Factors". 45. Prior to approval of the final project -specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project -specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". 46. The subject project, shall accept all existing off-site storm water drainage flows and safely convey those flows through or around the project site. If existing off-site storm water drainage flows mix with any on-site storm water drainage flows, then the off-site storm water drainage flows shall be treated with the on-site storm water drainage flows for storm water quality purposes, prior to discharging the storm water drainage flows from the project site. 47. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the Building Official, or his designee, the civil engineer of record shall file a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Post Construction Storm Water Treatment Devices As -Built Certificate with the Environmental Programs Coordinator, City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Services Department. 48. As the use of drywells are proposed for the structural storm water treatment device, to meet the infiltration requirements of the current Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Systems (MS4) Permit, adequate source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration shall be evaluated prior to infiltration and discussed in the final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan document. Printed; 8/23/2017 www.CityofRC.us Page 19 of 20 Project #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: SUBTT16605,M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673 P457 Sycamore Heights APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10 Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Variance, and Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 49. GROUND WATER PROTECTION: Prior to approval of the final project specific water quality management plan (WQMP), the WQMP document shall meet the requirements of the State Water Resources Control Board Order No. R8-2010-0036 (NPDES No. CAS 618036), the San Bernardino County Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Separation (MS4) Permit reads: Section XI.D(Water Quality Management Plan Requirements).8(Groundwater Protection): Treatment Control BMPs utilizing infiltration [exclusive of incidental infiltration and BMPs not designed to primarily function as infiltration devices (such as grassy swales, detention basins, vegetated buffer strips, constructed wetlands, etc.)] must comply with the following minimum requirements to protect groundwater: a. Use of structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause or contribute to an exceedance of ground water quality objectives. b. Source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration should be evaluated prior to infiltration. c. Adequate pretreatment of runoff prior to infiltration shall be required in gas stations and large commercial parking lots. (NOTE: The State Water Quality Control Board defines a large commercial parking lot as `100,000 sq. ft. or more of commercial development to include parking lot (with 100 or more vehicle traffics), OR, by means of 5,000sqft or more of allowable space designated for parking purposes'). d. Unless adequate pre-treatment of runoff is provided prior to infiltration structural infiltration treatment BMPs must not be used for areas of industrial or light industrial activity{77}, areas subject to high vehicular traffic (25,000 or more daily traffic); car washes; fleet storage areas; nurseries; or any other high threat to water quality land uses or activities. e. Class V injection wells or dry wells must not be placed in areas subject to vehicular{78} repair or maintenance activities{79}, such as an auto body repair shop, automotive repair shop, new and used car dealership, specialty repair shop (e.g., transmission and muffler repair shop) or any facility that does any vehicular repair work. f. Structural infiltration BMP treatment shall not be used at sites that are known to have soil and groundwater contamination. g. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall be located at !east 100 feet horizontally from any water supply wells. h. The vertical distance from the bottom of any infiltration structural treatment BMP to the historic high groundwater mark shall be at least 10 -feet. Where the groundwater basins do not support beneficial uses, this vertical distance criteria may be reduced, provided groundwater quality is maintained. i. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause a nuisance or pollution as defined in Water Code Section 13050. The final project -specific water quality management plan shall specifically address items, a., b., and c. above. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 8/23/2017 Page 20 of 20 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AUGUST 23, 2017 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DRC2015-00040, and Development Code Amendment DRC2015-00115. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project. Nikki Cavazos, Assistant Planner, gave the staff report and PowerPoint presentation (copy on file). Chairman Oaxaca opened the public hearing. Hearing and seeing no comment, he closed the public hearing. Bill Kennedy, Project Manager, said he had no additional comments; they accept all the conditions. Moved by Fletcher seconded by Wimberly carried 3-0-2 (Macias, Munoz absent) to adopt iiimmumb Resolution No. 17-74 approving Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20073 amsirrirmi *4 Items D3 -D7 were heard concurrently D3. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2016- 00206 - PACIFIC SUMMIT FOOTHILL, LLC - A request to amend tables and text, including clarifying text as necessary, in the General Plan to allow the development of land that contains slopes of 30 percent or greater. Related files: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16605M, Design Review DRC2012-00672, Variance DRC2016-00207, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2012-00673. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. This application will be forwarded to the City Council for final action. CONTINUED FROM AUGUST 9, 2017 D4. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP MODIFICATION SUBTT16605M - PACIFIC SUMMIT FOOTHILL, LLC - A request subdivide 24.19 acres into 6 parcels for the development of 175 attached condominium units in the Mixed Use (MU) District located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between Red Hill Country Club Drive and Pacific Electric Trail Right -of -Way; 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2016-00206, Design Review DRC2012-00672, Variance DRC2016-00207, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2012-00673. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. CONTINUED FROM AUGUST 9, 2017. Page 4 of 13 Attachment 7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AUGUST 23, 2017 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA D5. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2012-00672 - PACIFIC SUMMIT FOOTHILL, LLC - A request to develop 175 attached condominium units on 24.19 acres of land in Mixed Use (MU) District, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between Red Hill Country Club Drive and the Pacific Electric Trail Right -of - Way; APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2016-00206, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16605M, Variance DRC2016-00207, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2012-00673. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. CONTINUED FROM AUGUST 9, 2017. D6. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VARIANCE DRC2016-00207 - PACIFIC SUMMIT FOOTHILL, LLC - A request to exceed the 30 foot building envelop established by Development Code Section 17.122.020.D.1.e.(i and ii) for the develop 175 attached condominium units on 24.19 acres of land in the Mixed Use (MU) District, located an the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between Red Hill Country Club Drive and the Pacific Electric Trail Right -of -Way; APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24; 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112- 09 and 10. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2016-00206, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16605M, Design Review DRC2012-00672, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2012-00673. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. CONTINUED FROM AUGUST 9, 2017. D7. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TREE REMOVAL PERMIT - DRC2012-00673 - PACIFIC SUMMIT FOOTHILL, LLC - A request to remove 180 trees associated with the proposed development of 175 attached condominium units on 24.19 acres of land in Mixed Use (MU) District, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between Red Hill Country Club Drive and the Pacific Electric Trail Right -of -Way; APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2016-00206, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16605M, Design Review DRC2012-00672, and Variance DRC2016-00207. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. CONTINUED FROM AUGUST 9, 2017. Tom Grahn. Associate Planner, gave the staff report and PowerPoint Presentation (copy on file). He said the revised conditions of approval include two new conditions and were placed before the Commission for consideration: #3 (Planning Condition) re: the requirement to provide a pedestrian connection to the PE trail at the east side of the project and Engineering Condition #14 re: Master Plan Storm Drain Line 111-1 be constructed. (copy on file). The new conditions have been incorporated into the attached standard Page 5 of 13 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AUGUST 23, 2017 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CiVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA conditions with the resolutions. Prior correspondence received before this agenda production is attached to the staff report. Mr. Grahn noted additional correspondence was received since agenda production regarding the environmental docs submitted by Natasha Walton (discussion follows). Commissioner Fletcher asked if the western half of the site is 30% slope or greater. He asked how long the area has been zoned for mixed use. He also asked for a landscape plan visual with respect to the historical nature of the Sycamore inn and if a technical geological report was provided and if there are any concerns with respect to construction on that slope. Mr. Grahn said the site has been zoned Mixed Use since about early 2000: only about 6% of the site is 30% or greater: the applicant will provide a visual of the landscape plan around Sycamore !nn later in the presentation. He noted the geotechnical report was provided and analyzed -the report indicates the soil condition and construction on the slope is not a concern Commissioner Fletcher asked about the recreational amenities and noted 5 are required but only 4 are listed in the staff report but there are multiples of some amenities which in his mind does not constitute 5. He suggested if pets are allowed to live in the units, the developer should consider putting in a dog park for an additional amenity. Mr. Grahn said staff looked at the total number which satisfies the requirement. He deferred to the applicant. Chairman Oaxaca opened the public hearing. Chad Stadnicki, Project Manager. thanked the Commission and staff. He said Mr. Grahn has been very helpful with comments and analysis. He noted that in 2006, they had the approvals needed but no market for the product. He said the Site Plan only had a 5 -year life and then they decided they could do it better. He gave a PowerPoint presentation (copy on file) and said the new plan tries to address impacts to views. traffic, parking and also enhances Foothill Boulevard and the Sycamore Inn. Mark Rogers. the planner for the applicant, continued with their PowerPoint presentation (copy on file). He commented on the landscaping and buffer provided around the Sycamore Inn site. Page 6 of 13 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AUGUST 23, 2017 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Commissioner Fletcher spoke re: the amenities and suggested they add a dog park as that should be easy and would satisfy the 5 amenities requirement. Mr. Rogers agreed and said there is opportunity to be creative. Chairman Oaxaca opened the public hearing. Hank Stoy. a resident of the Red Hill area noted Mr. Grahn and Mr. Stadnicki were very accessible and responsive although he still had concerns. He referred to his letter and newspaper articles. He said the residents had prior assurances that it was safe to manufacture the slope but some existing residences have experienced problems. He said the traffic plan -creates dangerous U-turns. and the regular access and emergency access point is at the far west end. He expressed concern about the added time needed for first responders to travel from the west end of the site to the east end. Paul Gomez. residing in the Red Hill area expressed concern about disturbing the bottom of the slope/hill as he lives on top of the hill. He asked why the General Plan Amendment is needed. He asked more attention be given to existing, unfinished development and suggested using the removed trees be planted in the unfinished medians. Terri DiMarco, a Red Hill resident said traffic is her biggest concern: making a left turn into Red Hill off Vineyard takes a long time (2 lights). She said cars are already using the neighborhood as a pass thru to get to Carnelian and north to Base Line Road. She said noise from Foothill Boulevard will increase. She objected to removing trees and wished they could be replanted and preserve the heritage trees. She said she opposes blocked views in the area and is not in favor of building on the slope. She said there is already an increase of crime: mail boxes are being broken into. She said she liked the rural feel of the area. She asked the neighborhood be saved from this development and asked the proposal be rejected. Natasha Walton, a local biologist said her letter is on file. Her letter expresses concern re: loss of character of the hillsides. She said desert cottontails, white sage and the trees are present, and she requested more native plants and trees than non-native plants and trees to provide habitat for the existing animal population. She has a concern about the bats and their habitat and allowing them to safely abandon the existing trees progressively. She said the lighting should be screened and noted the lights of the restrooms at the Page 7 of 13 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AUGUST 23, 2017 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA trailhead are not shielded and we should preserve the night sky -LED lights are too bright and they affect the birds. She said she would like the City to buy the property and turn it into a park. She said no surveys were supplied for bats -she said to minimize impact to bats a progressive removal of trees should be done Jack Lieberman. a Red Hill resident. said he attended 3 prior meetings concerning the project. He expressed concern re: GPA. He there is some misunderstanding regarding the geological history. He said LA is built on an Arroyo Seco (dry river bed). He said this project area is similar stating there are 4 hills with ravines -the riverbeds fill with rain waters and this was not mentioned in studies. He said the property has not been properly described. Chairman Oaxaca closed the public hearing. He said he heard concerns regarding re: alteration of slopes. traffic management, access/egress. redirection of traffic through the Red Hill neighborhood, and the GPA with respect to the Development Code. Dan Eberhardt stated he is with the applicant's Engineering firm; the geotechnical consultant since 2002. He said there are cut slopes -- 2:1 slopes. 60 feet high. He said they have been analyzed under all types of conditions — dry, saturated, earthquake -the safety factors exceed what is required. He said studies were also done for fill slopes and in all cases they are comfortable; this is not an issue. He said with respect to the MSE wall and gross stability alt was evaluated and deemed safe and above the minimum requirements. He said the next phase after final grading plans are prepared will be to re- analyze the conditions. He said he takes exception to Mr. Liebermans' comments about there being 4 hills. The hill has erosion channels come from off-site (prior development) and most of the area is an elevated alluvial terrace. He said it erodes when it has concentrated flows and no underground streams were observed. Commissioner Fletcher said he generally believes a developed slope is more stable than undeveloped slope. Mr. Eberhardt said they analyze that it will be stable after it has been cut into: this slope is far in excess of the minimum safety requirements. Commissioner Fletcher asked about the drainage following development. Page 8 of 13 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AUGUST 23, 2017 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Mark Reider of David Evans and Associates, Civil Engineer said he has been involved since 2004. He said the existing development was built with outlet pipes that cause erosion and some of the gullies. He said there is a master plan storm drain facility that is provided and the storm drain system will drain to that facility as part of the project. He said it will collect the run-off. He said in final engineering a hydrology study will be provided along with hydraulic analysis. He said they are very aware of the hillside and drainage conditions and their storm drain plans will address that in the future. Chairman Oaxaca asked for comment regarding the traffic. Dan Close, Senior Traffic Engineer (representing the applicant) said the restricted movement allows for better flow on Foothill Boulevard. He said it does create more U- turns and it is not uncommon to restrict driveways from a major arterial. He said the study indicates 1,000 additional daily trips over a 24-hour period -a relatively small number. He said with respect to 'cut thru traffic', their study accounted for this and they also considered the City's study done in 2009. He said traffic movements have been consistent over the last 6 years and it is likely the cut thru' patterns will remain the same -additional trips through the neighborhood will be minimal. He said much of the traffic relates to children being delivered to the elementary school. Albert Espinoza, Assistant City Engineer, reported that last Wednesday at the Public Works Subcommittee, the Engineering Services Director, Jason Welday, discussed preliminary options he will be presenting to the Committee in the next couple of months to rehabilitate the west end of Foothill Boulevard from the PE Trail to Grove Avenue. (slide provided -copy on file) One option may include not widening Foothill Boulevard to 6 lanes because of regional improvements to the County such as the 210 Freeway which has redistributed traffic throughout the County (lessening the need for the originally proposed widening project). He said the proposed project will include a new traffic signal and the construction of a new alignment to Red Hill Country Club Drive which will be evenly spaced with existing signals along the corridor. He said the final design of the future improvements along Foothill Boulevard may or may not include a median in the final design. Flexibility has been given on the conditions of approval when it comes to a temporary physical barrier being installed to prevent left -turn movements from the proposed project driveway. Commissioner Fletcher asked what type of temporary barriers can be installed, two options were discussed; one is pavement delineators which can be glued to the ground or Page 9 of 13 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AUGUST 23, 2017 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA a raised median between 2 or 3 feet in width as not to impact business access to the south of the project (Magic Lamp and Vince's). Commissioner Fletcher noted that it has been a long time since the original proposal. He said the design is attractive and is a much better plan. He said with respect to the zoning: he said the facts and findings almost creates the argument that it never should have been mixed use but it is mixed use. He said the Developer listened to residents and incorporated those things into their plan. He said it does have lower density and he likes the live/work units; a nice City asset. He said the architectural design is very nice and good parking. He said his geological concerns were satisfied and trees can be replaced with more. He said the preservation of Bear Gulch is good. He said he wants the fifth amenity to be added: perhaps a dog park. Commissioner Wimberly concurred with all of his comments. He said he likes the Live/work units work well provided they are conditioned properly meaning no living in the work part of the unit. He said it needs to be used as a mixed use. He said the architect worked well with staff and he worked with them on DRC —they met all the requirements. He said the project will be an improvement to that part of the City Chairman Oaxaca thanked staff and noted that time has worked in their favor with the addition of the property to the west, there is now a reduction of density and added amenities and architecture. He said the main concerns regarding the slope have been addressed and this is the best possible outcome. He asked staff to clarify the need for the GPA with respect to the Development Code. Mr. Grahn replied that it is to reestablish consistency between the Development Code and the General Plan. Moved by Fletcher seconded by Wimberly carried 3-0-2 (Macias, Munoz absent) to adopt the resolutions recommending the City Council approve General Plan Amendment DRC2016-00206 (Resolution No. 17-75) and the Mitigated Negative Declaration which will be forwarded to the City Council for final action and that the Planning Commission adopt the Resolutions approving SUBTT16605M (Resolution No. 17-76); Design Review DRC2012-00672 (Resolution No. 17-77): Variance DRC2016-00207 (Resolution No. 17- 78) and Tree Removal Permit DRC2012-00673 (Resolution No. 17-79) The motion included Commission direction for staff to work with the applicant to achieve the addition of a fifth amenity on the project site and they accepted the revised standard conditions as Page 10 of 13 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AUGUST 23, 2017 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA placed before them on the dais (specifically Planning Condition #3 and Engineering Condition #14) or a Development Agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and DR Hor ► or the purpose of providing vested development rights and establishing permit ► holds and development timelines related to the construction of a mixed use proje .nsisting of 380 residential units, a 71 room hotel and two restaurant buildings total+. 12,000 square feet, located at the southwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard an• '..se Line Road — APN: 1090-331-05. The City Council adopted a Mitiga - Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for this project on July 19, 20 . The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental r- -w of a previously adopted Negative Declaration is required for subsequent project minor revisions to projects within the scope of a previous Negative Declaration. T• item will be forwarded to the City Council for final review and action. CONTINUAN REQUESTED. Donald Granger. Senior Planner n. d the agreement is still under review and that staff is requesting a continuance to the xt meeting on September 13, 2017. Chairman Oaxaca opene the Commission for meeting. e public hearing and hearing and seeing no comment asked otion to leave the hearing open to the September 13. 2017 Mr. Granger s- . the staff report will have the agreement attached and a summary of the major term• .f the agreement and a summary of the background and applicable Code section at is being recommended to Council. ed by Wimberly seconded by Fletcher carried 3-0-2 (Macias, Munoz absent) to ontinue Development Agreement DRC2017-00619 to the regular meeting on September 13 2017. E. COMMISSION BUSINESS/HISTORIC PRESERVATION AND PLANNING COMMISSION INTER -AGENCY UPDATES: Nrir)e Page 11 of 13 111., "%r- • P466 • "-%J L. I Vcu AUG 312017 cayCITY CLERK pia n i i r`e�o OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA City o, Rancho Cucamorja Re: Sycamore He-ht,s ProJc c f 8,765 Calle Cara be P467 Rancho Qocarnoa3a, CA 471736 Cgcq) q3(-- 08ss Roust 3/ 2017 I- wish to a peed i +he decisions made by the P fa r7[ r nd Co�rmisstorl of rIs m eetu?y D -C Rv'Us't z3) ZeI7) rela+,n,j +o -1-he �o! owrteoS, Vani at a Q v 5'&Me sfruc-i-ures waold tce4 +17e 3O -¢Soot hercght Iimi7'a`t'ioN dor hr�i icf irk S on ,Slopes= R1lowiJ5 +hese fo be bvrI-I- tnlauld ne ativety impact the uiew Prom my, .properrty, Thd developer. sihool4 be re4urr e( to cowtply wi+h the regoire en�ts o1 +he Deuelapavtent Code. E n v`ro o rv� if a l pa Tr --!c An estimated zcidifioaai Ioclz 61,34 vehicle -I-rips would be gener-afed on a lre8dy heavily- fraVCted%oo1 11 auieVard, X+ w'dv ld exaCerba problems a+ probably foe worst tflpt +er-sec+►orR the City-- roo 'hiif anc1 RedH;[I Country Club Drive, only one en+rap)ce/exit ani r-i/ht +urns only in and bot) the numerous v --turns required do ra,thil1 uVba!d cr-ea+e safety hazarc:lS, Cud--tf roc.l9h tra.P-Cic191aci Nr;l is bac)nd -to i nes`eaSe, Yet) no rni'ti9afion measoYe arm being cecioireLi o -C *he developer, The ► m p a ct on w i ldf l hee is u n i- ! esti ca l l y understated . F00- e plc} ftte red +ail hawk ca profeeted species) fr--equeofly Seein Red J,ll is not evert rnen,l-ioned in the bic ion rea i ressourc s survey: 3,R;pariah Habi+-at Pr servation of riparian habil-at i -s a ..+afed goal in +he Crays Genera( Pian C Poil•eyRc -8.I). BLYIL 1 -his projecp would cie-roocor rr.clerabfe, ari oun-1- cad i Tree Removal Permit This pro ec.t would regorre remoVrng 180 trees, To preserve the areas aciTthe +.cs ndl Character) more rrtatore fres should be saved, Arra r+ is Ali ��cutf +o belr'eue -+ha#' 'the nestrnq bird sortiey chd t f ind a side n egf i n any of- tate trees sated Por- removal, Yfl Impacts is prqject need to be more Polly i n vests?aced ao4 eualua+ed . • k : • u Enirenmert+al Torp. •. be ore -this •r. ec ec eonsidra-kon by +ham Ci+y, c bec1< 4or 427z5 rs attacheci to pay fhe il;n k, ,ir vVyappeaf, R t#-achmc nt Attachment 8 S t ncere l y ) r Ueory ti. '` an ti' \Vey P468 ,RCA 0, Associates LLC 15555 Main Street. #D4-235 Hesperia. California 92345 (760) 956-9212 fax (760) 244-0791 rca 123A:aoLcom www . rcaassoc iatcsl Ic.c om September 19. 2017 Pacific Summit -Foothill, LLC 2121 South Palm Avenue, Suite 200 Alhambra, CA 91801 RL: Sycamore Heights Project. Rancho Cucamonga. CA Response to comments #2017-27R Dear Sirs: As requested, we have reviewed the comments from Mr. Henry Stay and our response is provided below. Wildlife Biologists from RCA Associates, LLC documented all wildlife species observed on the site during recent field surveys. The red-tailed hawk was not observed, and since this species is not listed as threatened. endangered. or a species of special concern, a detailed discussion of the species was not provide in the biological discuss. 1lowever. the species is covered under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBIA), and in the event the hawk is observed nesting on the site prior to the start of ground clearing activities. the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) will he contacted to discuss mitigations which may be required. Riparian Habitat In accordance with the City's General Plan Policy RC -8.1, RCA Associates, LLC studied the site to identify the locations of any potential riparianlriverinc habitat and determine whether federal andior state jurisdiction applies. The study identified five riverine features—four conveying drainage from the condominium project on the north and one conveying drainage from the Red Hill golf course. All features drain into developed storm drain facilities directly to the south of the site. Based on U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACOE) and California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) criteria these features are not subject to their jurisdiction. However, prior to grading it is recommended that these findings be confirmed with CDFW and tJSACOF, and appropriate permits be obtained. if required. In addition, aside from potential jurisdictional issues, the applicant's conceptual grading plan proposes retaining much of the western riverine Attachment 9 P469 Pacific Summit -Foothill, I.I.0 page 2 feature south of the golf course. This area, commonly referred to as part of "Bear Gulch". will be Ieft in a relatively natural state. in addition. portions of the other four riverine features will be lett in place, as -is. until the point their drainage is collected by the project's proposed storm drain system. I.ct me know if you have any questions. or if you would like to discuss the contents of this letter. Sincerely. Randall C. Arnold. Jr. President & Principal Biologist HDFile 42OI7-27B LINSCOTT LAW & GREENSPAN engineers Response to Comment — Henry Stay Letter Project Daily Trips The conunenter is correct that the proposed Sycamore Heights Project is expected to generate 1,042 additional vehicles per day (vpd) onto Foothill Boulevard. Based on information provided by City of Rancho Cucamonga staff, Foothill Boulevard currently has an average daily traffic volume of 22,000 vpd in the vicinity of the project site and a daily capacity of 36,000 vpd. Even though the proposed project will add 1,042 additional daily trips to Foothill Boulevard, the existing roadway has more than adequate capacity to accommodate the increase in daily trips associated with the proposed project. Red Hill Country Club Drive/Foothill Boulevard intersection As presented in the traffic impact analysis report, the intersection of Red Hill Country Club Drive/Foothill Boulevard currently operates at unacceptable LOS F during the AM and PM peak hours under existing traffic conditions. The proposed Project will add some traffic to the already deficient intersection and the traffic impact analysis report does recommend an improvement at the intersection of Red Hill Country Club Drive/Foothill Boulevard in order to help alleviate the existing AM and PM peak hour deficiency. The recommended improvement, which was discussed with and approved by City of Rancho Cucamonga staff, consists of the following: • Red Hill Country Club Drive at Foothill Boulevard: Install signage to restrict northbound and southbound left -turn and through movements during the AM peak period (7:00 AM — 9:00 AM) and the PM peak period (4:00 PM — 6:00 PM). The aforementioned improvement recommended is required to alleviate the existing deficient peak hour level of service until the City of Rancho Cucamonga completes improvements planned as part of the Red Hill Country Club Drive realignment project, which will include a new traffic signal at Redhill Country Club Drive/Magic Lamp Inn Driveway and Foothill Boulevard. Project Access As required by the City of Rancho Cucamonga, primary access to the proposed Sycamore Heights Project will be provided via a proposed "right -turn in/right-turn out only" gated driveway on Foothill Boulevard. Secondary access to the proposed project, which will be restricted to "emergency vehicles only," will be provided along Red Hill Country Club Drive. The Rancho Cucamonga General Plan designates Foothill Boulevard as a Major Divided Arterial (i.e. 94 -foot paved width, inclusive of a 14 -foot median within a 120 -foot right-of-way). The restriction of turning movements at the primary project access on Foothill Boulevard to "right - turn in/right-tum out only" is consistent with the City's Circulation/Mobility Plan, which indicates that left -turn access on Foothill Boulevard is allowed at signalized intersections only. Due to the "right -turn in/right-turn out only" restriction at the proposed project driveway, the commenter is correct that project residents/guests will have to make u -tum movements at the adjacent intersections of either Foothill Boulevard/Grove Avenue, Foothill Boulevard/Red Hill Country Club Drive or Foothill Boulevard/San Bernardino Road when entering or exiting the project site. It should be noted that the traffic volume forecasting and intersection analysis Attachment 10 LINSCOTT LAW & GREENSPAN engineers included in the traffic impact analysis report takes into account the project u -turn movements at the aforementioned key study intersections. Project Cut -Through Traffic The traffic impact analysis report prepared for the project did provide a project cut -through discussion relative to the Red Hill Country Club Drive neighborhood. The traffic impact analysis report referenced the 2009 City -commissioned study and indicated that peak hour traffic volumes entering the neighborhood at the Foothill Boulevard and Red Hill Country Club Drive intersection in the Year 2009 versus the Year 2015 had not changed significantly and therefore came to the conclusion that the current cut -through traffic on Red Hill Country Club Drive to be similar to what was observed in 2009. Based on the project trip distribution pattern shown in Figure 5-1 of the traffic study, it was assumed that twenty percent (20%) of outbound project traffic would be considered new cut - through trips (i.e. 13 of the 64 outbound AM peak hour trips and 7 of the 32 outbound PM peak hour trips). These outbound project trips were assumed to travel through the Red Hill Country Club Drive neighborhood to access Carnelian Street and/or Baseline Road. It should be noted that this assumption was discussed and approved for use by City of Rancho Cucamonga staff. In addition, the traffic study recognized that the Valle Vista Elementary School located in the neighborhood will potentially generate project -related school drop-off and pick-up trips within the Red Hill Country Drive neighborhood. Based on the Central School District's estimates, the project is anticipated to generate 0.06 elementary students per unit, or eleven (11) new students. Assuming these 11 students are driven to school separately (i.e. no carpooling or households with multiple school age children), out of the 64 outbound AM peak hour project trips, 11 school -related additional AM peak hour trips would be generated in a worst-case scenario. It should be noted that middle school and high school student traffic was considered (i.e. Cucamonga Middle School, Alta Loma High School, Ruth Musser Middle School and Rancho Cucamonga High School); however project patrons would not travel through the Red Hill Country Club Drive neighborhood as these schools are located outside of the neighborhood. By applying the traffic distribution pattern shown in Figure 5-1 to the project's new trips and accounting for project school -related trips, we estimate that 24 AM peak hour outbound project trips (i.e. 13 project trips and 11 project school -related trips) out of 64 total outbound project trips will enter the Red Hill neighborhood at the Foothill Boulevard and Red Hill Country Club Drive intersection. These 24 new AM peak hour trips will represent an increase over current conditions, but they will not degrade the streets' level of service. It should be further noted that project -related cut -through traffic during the PM peak hour will be minimal (i.e. only the 7 outbound PM peak hour project trips discussed previously), since school -related traffic during the afternoon pick-up period occurs well before the PM peak period and given that the project driveway is restricted to right -turn in/right-turn out only movements, other project patrons are not expected to cut -through the Red Hill Country Club Drive neighborhood to access the project site. LINSCOii LAW & GREENSPAN engineers We appreciate the opportunity to prepare this response letter. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at (949) 825-6175. Sincerely, Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers Daniel A. Kloos, P.E. Senior Transportation Engineer California Registration: TR 2200 ■ <z" Attachment 11 187 TO PROPOSED BUILDINGS 12T TO PARKING 2 g r,1 14.10 O • 4: E4 W O Q n a n N o Q -n r▪ + P47 42- 9, CJ t P474 4tt,LCk_ a 6- ; i Z �t (14L5s L&� NA.. L6%. k1 11% �1. I``IL L.a Ota_ .+1�_, Yr\ ct_ ,, t� t� et. LA_ o, •u. �►-t.tk cij tx Qu_ '�-o— C Lei k,E.4,4_0� 01\ L..L `�tetc.. tilte� _,v� r r. A ���� 0-( R -L 2:44.�-LA..t 4 ( . ,c Li 0.L MG.* \ eta, ciIR r1t�1‘ 6 t rlx..�� rr�'�G;#-..�\k., r (gut. t - ,t ti�_ "'t44-12r1 U .Q d) rr la tLJCL 17c,� ��1 \ Qa il 4LY i1 f -u„. +-- at c� E.� w1� , tit �tL.�_4-�-- �� _ �dCl.,y� 1 _. �L.�t� L CCI �1yL , L t__. 72/ / _ 6'1 3 ( ( cl INA LUL (1--L1 CLltt &LL L RECEIVED CITU OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SEP 1 ? 2011 ADMINISTRATION Attachment 12 P475 RESOLUTION NO. 17-098 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2016-00206 TO AMEND TABLES AND TEXT, INCLUDING CLARIFYING TEXT AS NECESSARY, IN THE GENERAL PLAN TO ALLOW THE DEVELOPMENT OF LAND THAT CONTAINS SLOPES OF 30 PERCENT OR GREATER; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. 1. Pacific Summit Foothill, LLC, filed an application for General Plan Amendment No. DRC2016-00206 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 9th day of August 2017, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and continued the application to the August 23, 2017 Planning Commission meeting. 3. On the 23rd of August, 2017, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on General Plan Amendment DRC2017- 00206 and, following the conclusion thereof, issued Resolution No. 17-75, recommending to the City Council that the General Plan Amendment be approved. 4. On the 4th day of October, 2017, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 5. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above -referenced public hearing on October 4, 2017, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The General Plan Slope Development Guidelines address the development of parcels with a range of natural slopes that range from "5% or less" to "30% and over"; and b. The application proposes to amend the Slope Development Guidelines to provide an exception to the development of slopes "30% and over" provided certain site conditions can be met; and c. Proposed applicable exceptions address the project location, percentage of ATTACHMENT 13 Resolution No. 17-098 - Page 1 of 5 P476 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 17-098 DRC2016-00206 — PACIFIC SUMMIT FOOTHILL, LLC October 4, 2017 Page 2 site, and vegetation fuel management for wildfire protection; and d. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the Genera! Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and e. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element by allowing for the implementation of the Mixed Use designation in this area; and f. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above -referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the proposed amendment is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area the application will only apply to properties located south of Banyan Avenue in the Red Hill area of the City, all of the properties surrounding the project site have been developed, and the project site has been designed to appropriately address slope stability and other geologic factors of the site; and b. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties as the amendment will only apply to properties located south of Banyan Avenue in the Red Hill area of the City and will not have citywide development implications, all of the properties surrounding the project site have been developed and portions of the project site have been previously disturbed (i.e., development of the Red Chief Motel, Sycamore Inn, abandoned water basin, and surrounding residential, commercial and public developments), and the project site has been designed to appropriately address slope stability and other geologic factors of the site; and c. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. The Hillside Development criteria of the General Plan and Development Code were not intended to apply as uniformly to Mixed Use designated parcels as they do to a Residential designated parcel. The intent of the Hillside Development criteria density restriction was to address natural slopes, particularly those located in the foothill areas north of Banyan Street. Here, the project site has been previously disturbed (i.e., development of the Red Chief Motel, Sycamore Inn, abandoned water basin, and surrounding residential, commercial and public developments) so that the site is no longer in a natural condition. Because few, if any other sites with a "30% and over" slopes exist south of Banyan Street, the amendment will have limited application. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: Resolution No. 17-098 - Page 2 of 5 P477 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 17-098 DRC2016-00206 — PACIFIC SUMMIT FOOTHILL, LLC October 4, 2017 Page 3 a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. A comment letter was received from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) on July 27, 2017 in response to the circulated IS/MND. The only comment CDFW had was in relation to the possible Jurisdictional Waters on the project site. The applicant and their biologists prepared a Jurisdictional Delineation to address CDFW's comments. The Jurisdictional Delineation determined that jurisdictional waters were not present on the project site, but recommended compliance with the CDFW recommended mitigation measure prior to issuance of any grading permit. The Biological Resources section of the IS/MND, was revised to include a mitigation measure requiring the applicant to provide proof to the City that the Streambed Alteration Agreement (1602 Agreement) process has been concluded. According to CEQA Section 15073.5(a), recirculation of a negative declaration is required prior to its adoption when it has been substantially revised after public notice of its availability has been given pursuant to Section 15072. Furthermore, CEQA Section 15073.5(b) states, "a "substantial revision" of the negative declaration shall mean: (1) a new avoidable significant effect is identified and mitigation measure or project revisions must be added in order to reduce the effect to insignificance, or (2) the lead agency determines that the proposed mitigation measures or project revisions will not reduce potential effects to less than significance and new measures or revisions must be required." Here, either the CDFW will determine that notification under Section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code is required for the project, or they will require the applicant obtain a Streambed Alteration Agreement. The IS/MND was revised to include a discussion of the Jurisdictional Delineation for the project site and a mitigation measure requiring a Streambed Alteration Agreement was added to the MND and the project conditions of approval. The addition of a condition of approval requiring a Streambed Alteration Agreement is not considered substantial evidence in light of the whole record that cannot be mitigated. Therefore, the Streambed Alteration Agreement mitigation measure is not a substantial revision to the MND, and recirculation of the MND is not required; and b. The City Council has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and alt comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The City Council further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the City Council. Based on these findings, the City Council adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration; and c. The City Council has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The City Council adopts the Mitigation Resolution No. 17-098 - Page 3 of 5 P478 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 17-098 DRC2016-00206 — PACIFIC SUMMIT FOOTHILL, LLC October 4, 2017 Page 4 Monitoring Program for the project; and d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the City Council's decision is based is the City Planner of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Council hereby upholds the decision of the Planning Commission and denies an appeal, approving General Plan Amendment DRC2016-00206, by amending the General Plan Text, as shown in the attached Exhibits A, B, and C. 6. This Council hereby provides notice to Mr. Hank Stoy and Pacific Summit -Foothill, LLC, that the time within which judicial review of the decision represented by this Resolution must be sought is governed by the provisions of California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. 7. The City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby directed to: (a) certify to the adoption of this Resolution, and (b) forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail, return -receipt requested, to Mr. Hank Stay and Pacific Summit -Foothill, LLC, at the address identified in City records. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 4TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2017. Resolution No. 17-098 - Page 4 of 5 P479 General Plan Chapter 2: Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources EXHIBIT A irE 51op� 'it�VIOP • `" es , g Warless less¢£ ` This is •not a' hillside .condition Grading with conventional fully padded lots and terrac ng.is acceptable_" �' eielopment wirading is kpermitted. in thin zo e, but„ex rn '. l andfarms,:must retain their natriral character P0ded, bdlldmg "saes are' permitted however, 'techniques such as, contour grading, , combined .slopes, limited cut and -tiil,a and split 'level architecture, or padding for the structures only, may be required to reduce grading When in conjunction with the techniques, described above, and for a pr ct Withinia 4*6eplan whietr includes speotel dosign font ros, 'tu'ckas-a; golf .course, ".extensive open, space,Ior significant use of7 green belts or paseos,.'the Planning Commissioli"zmayconsiderithe use of;rnass .grading 'techniques adjacent to these special- design. featuresas partial compliance•with his�standard; - . 1;9 , s ,€ s : � ,. to4 ; � r _e � Th s is aahiliside condition Special° iillslde architectural: and des gn techniques thaminimize grading ,.:0 0, °required , in- this zone: Architectural prototypes'; are „expected ;to conform °to' the natural landform by using techniques such! as split level foundations of greater than 18 inches, stem walls, .stacking and cllustering In Y contunction with the alternative techniques described above, and"or ies speciial design features project withiniaamaster plan whic nclud uch as a golf e i'se, extensive open space for significant use of green belts 6r"'paseos, the A(arining° .Comnissiorimay, corisideC- padded building sites adjacent to those speciat'features when. itis found that said grading creates ai better relationship between: that ,. special design, ere'and the ad'ace tlots, . DevetoprAient withinthis zone lS.�tited.� artrs�lineore€ flan they e�ss�€ Visudallyprominent slopes; and then only.where ityc n be shown thaf safety, environmental and aesthetic impacts can�ibe: minimized. "Use; Of ” larger .lots variable setbacks ,and variable building structural; techiniques such as stepped, or pole foundations are expected Structures shall bleridg with the natural environment through t eir shape, materials and`colors Impact of traffic and roadwaysFis ta.be minimized by foI!owin ;3natural Contours. or,usirig"grade: separations $ ` `� � < , � to 28 5 , 3 k � h $ i a e 3 i F 30'and over 'This is. an excessive slope condition and` development' is prohibitedi unless all the following "are satisfied, (i) the property is located south, . Of Banyan •Street °(ii) at least seventy five percent (75%) ofthe lots or , parcels 4that are',thh64subtect of-�e developrrient applicatipr "'are b ` a(tirounded-bv:l'r t or parcels improved r'€ ithistr i tures-and'..(ili)' proposed='. project. isdetermined to..aporopriately address_!slope!'- stability and other geological factors of the site; and ;tiv) vecietation for fuel management for wildfire` protection cans" !be.' achieved- and N m-intalried _ „ EXHIBIT A P480 General Plan Chapter 2: Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources Land Use Goals and Policies Policy LU -8.6: Require that hillside development minimize alteration of natural landforms, and encourage clustering where feasible to retain maximum open space. fliscussion:• The objectives for managing development in hillside areas are to maintain existing slopes, vegetation, wildlife corridors, drainage patterns, knolls, rock outcrops, and ridgelines wherever feasible. Furthermore, the City should avoid development that would result in fire, flooding, landslide, erosion, and other safety hazards. The City seeks hillside development that limits the extent of grading alterations to natural landforms, and provides for innovative design and arrangement of building sites that retain significant natural habitats and features. Clustering is a way of laying out a project whereby the structures are "clustered" together and open space is shared by the residents. Existing slopes, vegetation, wildlife corridors, drainage patterns, knolls, rock outcrops, and ridgelines may be modified only if done in a manner consistent with the City's Hillside Development Ordinance. EXHIBIT B P481 General Plan Chapter 8: Public Health & Safety Public Health and Safety Goals and Policies Policy PS -6.1: Continue enforcement of the Hillside Development Guidelines to allow for prudent development and redevelopment of all properties located on slopes greater than 10 percent, and continue to preserve as open space properties located on slopes greater than 30 percent, except as otherwise provided below. plscussran.• The most effective way to protect lives and property from debris flows and slope instability is to continue to prohibit development on property that exceeds 30 percent in slope, in accordance with current ordinances unless all the following are satisfied: (1) the property is located south of Banyan Street: (ii) at least seventy-five percent (75%) of the lots or parcels that are the subject of the development application are surrounded by lots or parcels improved with structures: (iii) the proposed project is determined to appropriately address slope stability and other geological factors of the site: and (iv) vegetation for fuel management for wildfire protection can be achieved and maintained. In addition, property having a natural slope between 10 and 30 percent can be made unstable by development and grading activities. Hillside development guidelines enforce the existing grading standards and require aesthetic treatments that both improve the appearance of the hillsides and preserve the stability of the slopes. These measures include returning slopes to their natural appearance, density reduction, clustering of developments, and steepness after grading. Environmental preservation of the eastern San Gabriel Mountains is also required to reduce debris flow potential. Development of the hillside terrain will only increase the potential for debris flows to damage the City unless the situation is carefully managed. EXHIBIT C P482 RESOLUTION NO. 17-099 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, UPHOLDING THE DECISION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP MODIFICATION NO. 16605M, DESIGN REVIEW DRC2012-00672, VARIANCE DRC2016-00207 AND TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2012- 00673, TO SUBDIVIDE 24.19 ACRES INTO 6 PARCELS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF 175 ATTACHED CONDOMINIUM UNITS, INCLUDING THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION, A VARIANCE FOR THE BUILDING ENVELOPE HEIGHT ANDA REQUEST TO REMOVE 180 TREES IN THE MIXED USE (MU) DISTRICT LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, BETWEEN RED HILL COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE AND PACIFIC ELECTRIC TRAIL RIGHT-OF-WAY; DENYING THE APPEAL; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, AND 41 AND 0207-112-09 AND 10. A. Recitals. 1. Pacific Summit -Foothill,. LLC, filed applications for the approval of Tentative Tract Map Modification No. SUBTT16605M, Design Review DRC2012-00672, Variance DRC2016-00207 and Tree Removal Permit .DRC2012-00673, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the .above -referenced entitlements are referred to as "the application." 2. On the 12th day of April,. 2006, the Planning Commission adopted its Resolution No. 06-36, thereby approving Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16605, subject to specific conditions and time limits. 3. The initial approval of SUBTT16605 was for a duration of 3 years, to expire on April 12, 2009. The California State Legislaturepassed a series of Assembly/Senate Bills automatically extending the approval period of various active tentative maps. SB 1185 extended the approval period 1 -year to April 12, 2010, AB 333 extended the approval period 2 -years to April 12, 2012, AB 208 extended the approval period 2 -years to April 12, 2014, and AB 116 extended the approval period 2 -years to April 12, 2016. 4. On the 23rd day. of March, 2016, the Planning Commission adopted its Resolution No. 16-16, thereby approving DRC2015-01110 for a 1 -year Time Extension for SUBTT16605 to expire on April 12, 2017. 5. On the 26th day of April, 2017, the Planning Commission adopted its Resolution No. 17-28, thereby approving DRC2017-00249 for a 1 -year Time Extension for SUBTT16605 to expire on April 12, 2018. 6. On the 9th day of August 2017, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the Tentative Tract Map Modification application in addition to the Design Review, Variance and Tree Removal applications and continued them to the August 23, '2017 Planning. Commission meeting. • Resolution No. 17-099 - Page 1 of 5 ATTACHMENT 14 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 17-099 P483 APPEAL OF SUBTT16605M, DESIGN REVIEW DRC2012-00672, VARIANCE DRC2016-00207, AND TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2012-00673 — HANK STOY October 4, 2017 Page 2 7. On the 23rd of August, 2017, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on Tentative Tract Map Modification No. SUBTT16605M, Design Review DRC2012-00672, Variance DRC2016-00207 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2012-00673 and, following the conclusion thereof, issued Resolution Nos. 17-76, 17- 77, 17-78 and 17-79 respectively. 8. The decision represented by said Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 17-76, 17- 77, 17-78 and 17-79 was timely appealed to this Council. 9. On the 4th day of October, 2017, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 10. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above - referenced public hearing on October 4, 2017, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: 3. SUBTT16605M: a. The project site contains approximately 24.19 acres of a generally irregular configuration having a topography with a 30 percent or greater slope, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between Red Hill Country Club Drive and the Pacific Electric Trail, and is presently vacant; and b. The project site is located in the Mixed Use (MU) District; and c. The property to the north contains Condominiums and single-family homes in the Medium (M) Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and Low (L) Residential District (2- 4 dwelling units per acre), the property to the south contains office, commercial, and condominium uses in the Mixed Use (MU) District and Medium (M) Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre), the property to the east contains the Route 66 Trailhead and condominiums in the Medium (M) Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre), the property to the west contains commercial land uses in the Mixed Use (MU) District, and the proposed project surrounds the Sycamore Inn Restaurant in the Mixed Use (MU) District; and d. The application contemplates the subdivision of the subject parcel into six (6) lots for condominium purposes (175 units); and Resolution No. 17-099 - Page 2 of 8 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 17-099 P484 APPEAL OF SUBTT16605M, DESIGN REVIEW DRC2012-00672, VARIANCE DRC2016-00207, AND TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2012-00673 -- HANK STOY October 4, 2017 Page 3 e. The subdivision of the project site conforms to all applicable development standards applicable to property in the Mixed Use (MU) District; and f. The applicant has submitted applications related to the development of the project site including: General Plan Amendment DRC2016-00206, Tentative Tract Modification SUBTT16605M, Design Review DRC2012-00672, Variance DRC2016-00207, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2012-00673 to allow for the subdivision and development of the project site; and g. All lots will have access to a public right-of-way. Access to the project site will be via Foothill Boulevard and will include all public right-of-way improvements including pavement, sidewalk, curb, and gutter on the north side of Foothill Boulevard as well as all right- of-way improvements on interior streets; and h. The design or improvements of the tentative tract and proposed development, variance and tree removal applications are consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans; and i. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed and the proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and j. The design of the subdivision, development, variance and tree removal are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and k. The tentative tract, development, variance and tree removal applications are not likely to cause serious public health problems; and I. The design of the tentative tract nor the proposed development, variance or related tree removal applications will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at Targe, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 4. Based upon all of the evidence in the record and the findings and conclusions set forth above, this Council hereby upholds the decision of the Planning Commission and denies the appeal, approving Tentative Tract Map Modification No. SUBTT16605M. 5. Design Review DRC2012-00672: a. The proposed project will be a gated community with 1 vehicle entrance on Foothill Boulevard, located west of the Sycamore Inn restaurant, and 1 Emergency Vehicle Access (EVA) gate on Red Hill Country Club Drive; and b. The proposed project density is 7.23 dwelling units per acre; and c. The application contemplates the development of 44 two- and three-story condominium buildings for the development of 175 attached dwelling units; and Resolution No. 17-099 - Page 3 of 8 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 17-099 P485 APPEAL OF SUBTT16605M, DESIGN REVIEW DRC2012-00672, VARIANCE DRC2016-00207, AND TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2012-00673 — HANK STOY October 4, 2017 Page 4 d. The 175 units are provided throughout the project site in 44 individual buildings, each containing between 3 and 6 residential units. Units are provided in either a two-story or three-story building complex. There are 26 two-story units, 29 feet tall, with units ranging in size from 1,296 square feet to 1,701 square feet and 18 three-story units, 35 feet tall, with units ranging in size from 1,672 square feet to 2,108 square feet; and e. The proposed unit mix will consist of 28 two-bedroom units (at 1,296 square feet), 119 three-bedroom units (ranging in size from 1,540 square feet to 2,108 square feet) and 28 four-bedroom units (ranging in size from 1,976 square feet to 1,995 square feet). The 9 live/work units include 2 two-bedroom units (with 1,531 square feet of living area and 249 square feet of commercial floor area) and 7 three-bedroom units (ranging in size from 1,782 square feet to 1,916 square feet of living area and 249 square feet of commercial floor area); and f. Proposed architectural styles include Santa Barbara and Provence, and include 360 degree architectural elements such as: tile roofs, stucco finish, multi -paned windows, metal balconies, wood shutters, and additional architectural embellishments; and g. A total of 9 live/work units are provided adjacent to the Foothill Boulevard driveway, with adjacent parking and pedestrian access; and h. Parking for the project site is provided in two -car garages for each unit, providing 350 parking spaces, 9 parking spaces for the live/work units, and 130 open parking spaces; and i. The proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and j. The proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and k. The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and I. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 6. Based upon all of the evidence in the record and the findings and conclusions set forth above, this Council hereby upholds the decision of the Planning Commission and denies the appeal, approving Design Review DRC2012-00672. 7. Variance DRC2016-00207: a. Approximately half of the project site is located within the Hillside Overlay District of the Zoning Map, of which the Development Code establishes building envelopes and maximum building height for properties located in hillside areas. Hillside Development criteria, Section 17.122.020(D)(e) of the Development Code, establishes a 30 -foot maximum building height for all structures located in the Hillside Overlay District; and Resolution No. 17-099 - Page 4 of 8 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 17-099 P486 APPEAL OF SUBTT16605M, DESIGN REVIEW DRC2012-00672, VARIANCE DRC2016-00207, AND TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2012-00673 -- HANK STOY October 4, 2017 Page 5 b. The applicant is proposing a total of 44 condominium units including 26 two-story tri-plex units up to a maximum of 29 feet in height, and 18 three-story four-, five-, and six-plex units up to a maximum of 35 feet in height; and c. Roughly half of the three-story units are located within the Hillside Overlay !District and exceed the allowable maximum 30 -foot building height; and d. The project site contains approximately 24.19 acres of a generally irregular configuration having a topography with a 30 percent or greater slope, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between Red Hill Country Club Drive and the Pacific Electric Trail, and is presently vacant; and e. The project site is located in the Mixed Use (MU) District; and f. The property to the north contains Condominiums and single-family homes in the Medium (M) Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and Low (L) Residential District (2- 4 dwelling units per acre), the property to the south contains office, commercial, and condominium uses in the Mixed Use (MU) District and Medium (M) Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre), the property to the east contains the Route 66 Trailhead and condominiums in the Medium (M) Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre), the property to the west contains commercial land uses in the Mixed Use (MU) District, and the proposed project surrounds the Sycamore Inn Restaurant in the Mixed Use (MU) District; and g. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulations would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the Development Code; and h. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same district; and i. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district; and j. That the granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district; and k. That the granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 8. Based upon all of the evidence in the record and the findings and conclusions set forth above, this Council hereby upholds the decision of the Planning Commission and denies the appeal, approving Variance DRC2016-00207. 9. Tree Removal Permit DRC2012-00673: Resolution No. 17-099 - Page 5 of 8 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 17-099 P487 APPEAL OF SUBTT16605M, DESIGN REVIEW DRC2012-00672, VARIANCE DRC2016-00207, AND TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2012-00673 --- HANK STOY October 4, 2017 Page 6 a. The trees are not designated as historically significant; and b. The trees are not noted in any Specific Plan/Community Plan or condition of approval; and c. The applicant has submitted an arborist report assessing the health of the individual trees. The Arborist Report (Jim Borer, August 2012) evaluated a total of 198 trees on the project site. Of those 198 trees, 64 meet Development Code criteria to be classified as Heritage Trees, and 18 of those Heritage Trees are recommended for preservation. The 180 trees not identified by the Arborist Report as suitable for preservation are considered over -mature, have poor growth character, have advanced decay, some are dead or are in poor general health; many of these trees have further declined in health due to the prolonged effects of the drought. Additionally, several trees, although in good health, their location conflicts with proposed improvements and the applicant proposes to remove these trees; and d. It is necessary to remove the trees in order to construct improvements which allow economic enjoyment of the property; and e. There are a significant number of trees existing in the neighborhood; the removal does not affect the established character of the area; and f. It is necessary to remove the trees to construct required improvements within the public street right-of-way or within a flood control or utility right-of-way; and g. The trees cannot be preserved by pruning and proper maintenance or relocation rather than removal; however, 2 trees (Borer Report, Trees No. 76 and 175) may be suitable candidates for relocation; and h. The trees do not constitute a significant natural resource of the City; and i. The proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and j. The proposed project is in accord with the objectives of the Municipal Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and k. The proposed project is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and I. The proposed project, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 10. Based upon all of the evidence in the record and the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs above, this Council hereby upholds the decision of the Planning Commission and denies the appeal, approving Tree Removal Permit DRC2012-00673. Resolution No. 17-099 - Page 6 of 8 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 17-099 P488 APPEAL OF SUBTT16605M, DESIGN REVIEW DRC2012-00672, VARIANCE DRC2016-00207, AND TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2012-00673 — HANK STOY October 4, 2017 Page 7 11. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above - referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 through 10 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: 12. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. A comment letter was received from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) on July 27, 2017 in response to the circulated IS/MND. The only comment CDFW had was in relation to the possible Jurisdictional Waters on the project site. The applicant and their biologists prepared a Jurisdictional Delineation to address CDFW's comments. The Jurisdictional Delineation determined that jurisdictional waters were not present on the project site, but recommended compliance with the CDFW recommended mitigation measure prior to issuance of any grading permit. The Biological Resources section of the IS/MND, was revised to include a mitigation measure requiring the applicant to provide proof to the City that the Streambed Alteration Agreement (1602 Agreement) process has been concluded. According to CEQA Section 15073.5(a), recirculation of a negative declaration is required prior to its adoption when it has been substantially revised after public notice of its availability has been given pursuant to Section 15072. Furthermore, CEQA Section 15073.5(b) states, "a "substantial revision" of the negative declaration shall mean: (1) a new avoidable significant effect is identified and mitigation measure or project revisions must be added in order to reduce the effect to insignificance, or (2) the lead agency determines that the proposed mitigation measures or project revisions will not reduce potential effects to less than significance and new measures or revisions must be required." Here, either the CDFW will determine that notification under Section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code is required for the project, or they will require the applicant obtain a Streambed Alteration Agreement. The IS/MND was revised to include a discussion of the Jurisdictional Delineation for the project site and a mitigation measure requiring a Streambed Alteration Agreement was added to the MND and the project conditions of approval. The addition of a condition of approval requiring a Streambed Alteration Agreement is not considered substantial evidence in light of the whole record that cannot be mitigated. Therefore, the Streambed Alteration Agreement mitigation measure is not a substantial revision to the MND, and recirculation of the MND is not required; and b. The City Council has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all Resolution No. 17-099 - Page 7 of 8 P489 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 17-099 APPEAL OF SUBTT16605M, DESIGN REVIEW DRC2012-00672, VARIANCE DRC2016-00207, AND TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2012-00673 — HANK STOY October 4, 2017 Page 8 comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The City Council further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the City Council. Based on these findings, the City Council hereby adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration; and c. The City Council has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The City Council adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project; and d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the City Council's decision is based is the City Planner of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 13. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1 through 12 above, this Council hereby upholds the decision of the Planning Commission and denies the appeal, approving Tentative Tract Map Modification No. SUBTT16605M, Design Review DRC2012-00672, Variance DRC2016-00207 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2012-00673 subject to each and every condition set forth in Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 17-76, 17-77, 17-78 and 17-79 shall apply as if set forth herein in full. 14. This Council hereby provides notice to Mr. Hank Stoy and Pacific Summit -Foothill, LLC, that the time within which judicial review of the decision represented by this Resolution must be sought is governed by the provisions of California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. 15. The City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby directed to: (a) certify to the adoption of this Resolution, and (b) forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail, return -receipt requested, to Mr. Hank Stoy and Pacific Summit -Foothill, LLC, at the address identified in City records. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 4TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2017. Resolution No. 17-099 - Page 8 of 8 Sycamore Heights General Plan Amendment DRC2016-00206 And Appeal of Tentative Tract Map Modification SUBTT16605M Design Review DRC2012-00672 Variance DRC2016-00207 Tree Removal Permit DRC2012-00673 City Council October 4, 2017 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Location Map CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2006 Approvals • General Plan Amendment DRC2004-00339 — A request to amend the General Plan to allow the development of land that contains a 30 percent slope • Development Code Amendment DRC2004-00352 — A request to amend the Development Code to allow the development of land that contains a 30 percent slope. • Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16605 — An 8-lot residential subdivision for condominium purposes (206 units) on 21 acres. • Design Review DRC2003-00637 — The design review of building elevations and detailed site plan for 206 condominiums on 21 acres. • Variance DRC2005-01061 — A request to reduce the parking lot setback to allow improvements to an existing parking lot for the Sycamore Inn Restaurant. • Minor Development Review DRC2004-00826 —Parking lot, loading area modifications and covered patio area at the Sycamore Inn Restaurant. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA August 23, 2017 PC Approvals The Planning Commission recommend approval of: • General Plan Amendment DRC2016-00206 — A request to amend the General Plan to allow the development of land that contains a 30 percent slope. The Planning Commission approved the following, contingent upon the City Council's approval of the related General Plan Amendment. • Tentative Tract Map Modification SUBTT16605M — A 6 -lot residential subdivision for condominium purposes (175 units) on 24 acres. • Design Review DRC2012-00672 — The design review of building elevations and detailed site plan for 175 condominiums on 24 acres. • Variance DRC2006-00207 — A request to exceed the 30 -foot maximum building height. • Tree Removal Permit DRC2012-00673 — A request to remove 180 trees associated with the project. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • 206 D.U. • 21.3 AC. • 9.7 D.U./AC. PREVIOUS PLAN Plan Comparison • 175D.U. • 24.3 AC. • 7.2 D.U./AC. CURRENT PLAN CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Sycamore Heights Project CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Current Proposal • General Plan Amendment DRC2016-00206 — A request to amend the General Plan to allow the development of land that contains a 30 percent slope • Tentative Tract Modification SUBTT16605M — A 6-lot residential subdivision for condominium purposes (175 units) on 24 acres. • Design Review DRC2012-00672 — The design review of building elevations and detailed site plan for 175 condominiums on 24 acres. • Variance DRC2016-00207 — A request to exceed the 30 foot building envelope. • Tree Removal Permit DRC2012-00673 — A request to remove 180 trees associated with the development of the project site. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA GPA DRC2OI6-00206 • Proposed GPA is identical to the previously approved GPA. • General Plan Land Use Element establishes design, grading, and development criteria associated with various slope conditions. • General Plan establishes policy guidelines for the development of slopes ranging from "5% or less" up to "15% to 29.9%" and prohibits development on slope conditions "30% and over". CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 5 or less 5 to 7.9 8 to 14.9 15to29.9 30 and over GPA DRC2OI6-00206 • This is an excessive slope condition and development is prohibited, unless all the following are satisfied: o (i) the property is located south of Banyan Street; o (ii) at least seventy-five percent (75%) of the lots or parcels that are the subject of the development application are surrounded by lots or parcels improved with structures; o (iii) the proposed project is determined to appropriately address slope stability and other geological factors of the site; and o (iv) vegetation fuel management for wildfire protection can be achieved and maintained. Table LCT -19: Slope Development Guidelines Percent Naturallib elfin This is not a hillside condition. Grading with conventional, fully padded lots and terracing is acceptable. Development with grading is permitted in this zone, but existing Iandfcmis must retain their natural character. Padded building sites are permitted, however, techniques such as contour grading, combined slopes, limited cut and 1111, and split level architecture, or padding for the structures only, may be required to reduce grading_ When in conjunction with the techniques described above, and for a project within a master plan which includes special design features such as a golf course, extensive open space, or significant use of green belts or paseos, the Planning Commission may consider the use of mass grading techniques adjacent to these special design features as partial compliance with this standard. This is a hillside condition. Special hillside architectural and design techniques that minimize grading are required in this zone_ Architectural prototypes are expected to conform to the natural landform by using techniques such as split level foundations of greater than 18 inches: stem walls: stacking and clustering. In conjunction with the alternative techniques described above, and for a project within a master plan which includes special design features such as a golf course, extensive open space or significant use of green belts or paseos, the Planning Commission may consider padded building sites adjacent to those special features when it is found that said grading creates a better relationship between that special design feature and the adjacent lots. Development within this zone is limited to no more than the less visually prominent slopes: and then only where it can be shown that safety, environmental and aesthetic impacts can be minimized Use of larger Tots, variable setbacks and variable building structural techniques such as stepped, or pole foundations are expected_ Structures shall blend with the natural environment through their shape, materials, and colors. Impact of traffic and roadways is to be minimized by following natural contours, or using grade separations. This is an excessive slope condition and development is prohibited, unless all the following are satisfied: (j) the property is located south of Banyan Street (ii) at least seventy-five percent (75%) of the lots or parcels that are the subject of the development application are surrounded by lots or parcels improved with structures; and (iii) the proposed project is determined to appropriately address slope stability and other geological factors of the site: and (iv) vegetation for fuel management for wildfire protection can be achieved and maintained. GPA DRC2OI6-00206 • Development Code standard is applicable to slopes "30% and over" and states: • This is an excessive slope condition and development is prohibited, unless all the following are satisfied: o (i) the property is located south of Banyan Street; o (ii) at least seventy-five percent (75%) of the lots or parcels that are the subject of the development application are surrounded by lots or parcels improved with structures; o (iii) the proposed project is determined to appropriately address slope stability and other geological factors of the site; and o (iv) vegetation fuel management for wildfire protection can be achieved and maintained. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -I SUBTT16605M TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NC). 16605 FOR .(7)1\11DC:ohA I Ni LJUIRP CDS FS couI Y OF SAN BEF}NAR.INO CIT' OF RANCHO CA nen r'rscoLx Y c osiv . �.. am r 7,.....,:„...,,,f_.:,,. +NR,;'.a-l..at .. l.. Wl OOK Til YAP ■Oi ,:16p_.. '.� `l.� .0 �'' i L G 1 3 1 L CI' d ' ,. . 1 1 l J ,i1L. -- I ▪ \ ;1 s • � I-7'- ▪ -..i-a I!�=61 `� t k. L \ Ll I i 1.� fr L 0 1 1 _ ` may - I= F -- ti �t r,• � 7 - Bj�r'. LR-_ r Ta I., KL,iH i, BAN laOrTTA0.10n0H07Fen. -CE .s. tom r ice_:� 4T1 LL!dJ W`, PRJR.•IEfS x:ve- r.y CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HD" HlicetiUKHRICH MAP wail CO ••S • 1Y8 R�Y1Y: SUBTTI 6605M 1 LOT 15 11. I 1 1 MTC f LONE I 0 r ,8 4�7 •i 7 7 S 1 B 1 7- s L O i.Y.f1.0f4'h Pi0.rl . 4k • lrcbti-i n +s r+} .472 yaw X4CK iR ✓ R ikeT 11 C+_ 1•315( d B 7 1 4 r E 2-■ 7 II- • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Design Review DRC2OI2-00672 • Design review of a 175 -unit, multi -family attached condominium development on 24.19 acres. • Density of 7.23 du/ac. • Gated community with 1 vehicle entrance on Foothill Boulevard, and 1 EVA gate on RHCC. • Site Plan wraps around Sycamore Inn Restaurant providing a single right -in -right -out project driveway. • 9 Live/Work units are provided at project entrance, with adjacent parking and pedestrian access. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Design Review DRC2OI2-00672 • Units are provided throughout the 24 -acre site, with most units on two large relatively flat graded pads. • Building pads on the lower tier directly adjacent to Foothill Boulevard are approximately 6 to 21 feet above the existing street grade. • Building pads on the upper tier east are approximately 60 feet below the existing condominium project to the north. • A 30 -foot -high Mechanically Stabilized Embankment (MSE) separates the lower and upper building tiers. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Site Plan MEW- . . . F ii f CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Site Plan RETAIN DEAR GULCH REC. CENTER ADJACENT OPEN SPACE E.Y.A. ONLY COUNTRY 11B /R1V PROPOSED ROAD AND OPEN SPACE AGAINST SYCAMORE INN '1479ir..W'SZ ' —• 11. 71 • • .11111 07-6,141_ 800, ',EL/4RD CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Site Plan i iLii M5E WALL MAX EIGHT 30' AGAINST SYCAMORE INN PEDESTRIAN ACCESS' ALONG EDGE Site Plan LANDSCAPED MANUFACTURED SLOPE PARKING ABOVE STANDARD OPEN SPACE FEATURE OPEN SPACE FEATURE ". ;7 ti If $t tI 4 r R.� J to, • PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ALONG EDGE 4• CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Site Plan 2 -STORY TRI-PLEX UNIT WI t. PARKING ABOVE STANDARD E.V.A. / TRAIL ARTICULATED ENTRIES -• -J��' LANDSCAPED MANUFACTURED SLOPE MEANDERING TRAIL ALONG FOOTHILL BOULEVARD CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Grading Plan - • JZ �� 1.3isn° ^: P SYCAMORE INN RESTAURANT ) TNA P.} < • 4 - xJ • WI I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Grading Plan / , '-': _' , 1-.7 7. - - — ,. .. -i." . r' <4 (..::, E s _,• I -. , • : , • . . — 71- -,,... • ....,. „ , ...„ _r_ -- _...,e• --- -- —•• --- ------ - '—. - - • ]•--e.e=m • • _c. -EU :.1i-WW7, • r•---"' # •• \ • ••• rs," • '-- .•-e ,-.- 4\k .-.--.1•1 --, •. e " ,', ,, i= ..,_.,::''''.7-- _ • - :_ •,... VhA\ - =-. % • ' .I( \\ 50'5, •- = : • •• , .-'.S1, .. .. . • .• ' :; r, e..;.i. ........,...al....e- , • -r- :7"- • 1 I ••• ILaArrf PV -I t • ' .1i),• . . • L j.'•• 1 ....7.m.,.,•--. 11111111 I g : . -.:---...-1,-.-'. i idA •-1 Arm IP., % '1:.:..:.: • I l' r ''' , t': •,.-,..1 • I NA . . - . • r — ,--- 7.-- - • - - ,-. . - • I . ., •••"-L---_..__! .. ,k.•' .1_ •Th - m ,, --' g '. _r_ _r_ 1 r •:.: I • —.----- - . : 1 .., oe ,_.--- ..-- ..-, , ....._ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Grading Plan re I e • t 4 Sof" . ....r__ �. �-'' .Y - t, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Grading Plan • - • i • • - ‘' • V.1 • ..?.1. .....'' ' ..-- • A.-_-- »....---,---- ..„....i. '..•._ ....<::>..- ;EJ ..'.' ..............p...., ..P .... - -- = = .....ifF -.S..' ..--- ,.----- ...----- ----. 1, I a, LIEF_ALA Nt CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Grading Plan 3-5TORY TOWNHOUSE PRODUCT // 1 EXISTING NATURAL MANLY SLOPE RE5.01370 PROPOSED ROAD @1314 PROPOSED RES. 01315 Pacific Summit Foothill, LLC AM DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES, INC �landm LANGAN ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES LIM CHANG ROHLING &ASSOCIATES Section B Sycamore Heights CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Grading Plan 3 -STORY TOWN HOUSE PRODUCT RES. 01315 MANUF. SLOPE 1 1 MANUF.SLOPE 30 `MSE WALL PROPOSED ROAD @1276 PROPOSED RES @1277 Pacific Summit Foothill, LLC Section C A-rFtDAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. andv� LANGAN ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES LIM CHANG ROUTING & ASSOCIATES • •v •-•• Sycamore Heights CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Grading Plan SWALE 3' BLOCK WALL WITH PLEXIGLA55 • T> RET. WALL 4 REf, WALL PL MEANDERING WALK PKOP05ED RES 01277 MANUF. , , FOOTHILL PASEO (MIH.15) SLOPE BLVD. 01250 MEANDERING TRAIL Pacific Summit FoothiII, LLC Section D DAVID EVAN& AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Arc LANGAN ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES LIM CHANG ROHLING & ASSOCIATES Sycamore Heights CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Grading Plan 187' TO PROPOSED BUILDINGS 127 TO PARKING 1420 - 1380 1360 1340 1320 1300 1280 1260 5;r�frClrrr� 25 TO SLOPE PROPOSED - EXISTING GRADE GRADE PROPOSED j;i• PROPOSED RETAINING WALL 21 MANUFACTURED 1 18.5' EXISTING BLDG " " ROAD " " SLOPE ^ I BLDG EL. 1320' EL. 1373' TRACT BOUNDARY -1420 1380 1360 1340 1320 1300 -1280 1260 LOCATION OF BLDG, IN PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLAN CLOSEST TO P.L, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Design Review DRC2OI2-00672 • The 175 units are provided throughout the project site in 44 individual buildings, each containing between 3 and 6 residential units. • Units are provided in either a 2 -story or 3 -story building complex. • There are 26 two-story units, 29 feet tall, with units ranging in size from 1,296 square feet to 1,701 square feet and 18 three-story units, 35 feet tall, with units ranging in size from 1,672 square feet to 2,108 square feet. • Parking is provided in two -car garages for each unit, providing 350 parking spaces, 9 parking spaces for the live/work units, and 130 open parking spaces. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Design Review DRC2OI2-00672 • Architectural styles include Santa Barbara and Provence, and include 360 degree architectural elements such as: tile roofs, stucco finish, multi -paned windows, metal balconies, wood shutters, and additional architectural embellishments. • The 175 -unit mix consists of 28 two-bedroom units, 119 three-bedroom units, and 28 four-bedroom. • The 9 live/work units include 2 two-bedroom units and 7 three-bedroom. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Floor Plans & Elevations Front Elevation S YCAMORE HEIGHTS 2 -STORY TRIPLEX ELEVATIONS: Santa Barbara A-1.4 Pacific Summit Foothill, LLC Novrmncr 1H, 2616 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Floor Plans & Elevations ELEVATION NOTES Es e• t_ GM= a -.ca" Tara u Fun., E&,04.. Del)a E nettewr E bOW oe._ rUH NOCO E E r�U E r OH E TVO, E E rn `r P. °'111 �glll� �INgt� MUM Rear Elevation -;.7,7 Right Elevation . f f l T SYCAMORE HEIGHTS • • 2 -STORY TRIPLEX ELEVATIONS: Santa Barbara A-1.5 Pacific Summit Foothill, LLC November I N, 201.6 01.31.11111,16161J,•.1.1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Floor Plans & Elevations ELEVATION NOTES 111 K. o NKR 11« GCCAAWC E n. DETNAPENlit rintsn E • 111 E PAM. krThL corn E PORN E eeez.mve Front Elevation Left Elevation SYCAMORE HEIGHTS SALE: '4' = 1'-0 2 -STORY TRIPLEX ELEVATIONS: Provence A-1.6 Pacific Summit Foothill, LLC November I R, 2016 N. LNANG RONL4 4:511: , ti .I.1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA EL Er I -n, /TFS Floor Plans & Elevations E E • PAWS, ram Ewa. c,oe E=• coo wNAre • Aft. POT Rear Elevation Right Elevation SYCAMORE HEIGHTS 2 -STORY TRIPLEX ELEVATIONS Provence A-1.7 Pacific Summit Foothill, LLC November 18 zol6 I.IM Il1ANG RfNILENG ti.1.1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Floor Plans & Elevations RIGHT ELEVATION LEFT ELEVATION SYCAMORE HEIGHTS REAR ELEVATION ...... 1,111...,pl , n ql;i .r' i �� loin , 11i'. 1111,, : ' _ ... 1111,. iii R;;T FRONT ELEVATION 3—STORY SIXPLEX ELEVATIONS: EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A-2.3 Pacific Summit Foothill, LLC November IS. 2616 • LCWt I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Parking Type Humber of Unita Development Code Standard Required Covered Parking Parking Spaces Required Total Provided Parking Two Bedroom Units q 2.0 Spaces/Unit 11 in garage or carpark' 28 5.n 55 Three Bedroom Units .1.1: 2.0 Space Unit (2 in garage or carport) 238 .--- 23.3 =c.!" room Units ` 2.5 Spaces/Un t (2 in garage or carport, 7n (includes 14 uncoverd) Retail Paring` ``i 1 space for each 250 square feet of leasable area = � Guest Parking 17E 1 per 3 units =f 115 Enclosed Garage Spaces 322 Total Parking Spaces Required 432 Total parking Spaces Provided On -Site 489 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Parking POO - irk im • i 1 IARKING- ST DY _ S"-CANO.EKI FE 3rAUL IT OAP: • 4� f� � fJ S4J BE}gvARLLV-) RD S PNNO EF5C£ 94NlPf7 nadir MR NO. ...A.... ',No Daae+MS AM I. MI Mean •a•PC Una L • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Variance DRC2OI 6-00207 • Hillside Development criteria establish a 30 -foot maximum building height for all structures located in the Hillside Overlay District. • The applicant is proposing a total of 44 condominium units including 26 two-story tri-plex units up to a maximum of 29 feet in height, and 18 three-story four-, five-, and six-plex units up to a maximum of 35 feet in height. • Roughly half of the three-story units are located within the Hillside Overlay District and exceed the allowable maximum 30 -foot building height. • The applicant submitted a Variance to exceed the 30 -foot maximum building height. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Variance DRC2OI 6-00207 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Variance DRC2016-00207 • Hillside standards were established to regulate maximum height on slope conditions when developing SFR. • Not intended to regulate multi-family development in the Mixed Use District. • Proposed large flat building tiers • Proposed development will not be located on a slope condition. • Enforcement of the Hillside development standards will be inconsistent with the objectives of the Development Code. • Mixed Use District accommodates a variety of uses, and was never intended to apply to properties in hillside conditions. • The intent of the Hillside Development criteria was to address the development natural slopes, here, we have a 24-acre fractured site surrounded by developed land. • The project site has been so altered by surrounding development, is not a natural slope, is outside the intent of the Hillside Development requirements of the Development Code, and is so unique that there are no other Mixed Use District slope conditions within the City. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Tree Removal Permit DRC2OI2-00673 • The Arborist Report evaluated 198 trees on site. 64 meet Development Code criteria for Heritage Trees. Of those 64 trees, 18 are recommended for preservation. • The 180 trees not identified as suitable for preservation are considered over-mature, have poor growth character, have advanced decay, some are dead or are in poor general health; many of these trees have further declined in health due to the prolonged effects of the drought. Additionally, several trees, although in good health, their location conflicts with proposed improvements and the applicant proposes to remove these trees. • Tree preservation priorities that should be considered include: 1) preserve-in-place healthy trees, 2) if trees cannot be preserved in place, then transplant elsewhere on-site, and as a last resort, 3) remove and replace with largest nursery grown stock available. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Tree Removal Permit DRC2OI2-00673 • The remaining 18 trees that meet Heritage Tree criteria are recommended for preservation due to their location, mature form, good growth character, and vigorous health; these trees are principally located north of the Sycamore Inn restaurant. • Two of the trees proposed for removal are Coast Live Oak trees of "mature form and character, good vigor" (Arborist Report, Trees No. 76 and 175) and their location conflicts with proposed improvements. Conditions of approval require the trees to be either transplanted elsewhere on-site or removed and replaced with the largest nursery grown stock available. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Landscape Plan y0Y".' ' ©.iii .'R C'd ?®1 : L'`l r'0 e+rytI -'i DI ID e- ir r...lp! !C3?a�, it a �r-I fli in o i©w CI !D a. r o�.r icor a LI 131 11:10-44.-,13 e L 1 eo "Ell '! .ciiG1 1! ',� s•pl_._ I[1s cit. �Rn e�ge!!�p! !a•.•rr:•rr,•n•ea-ee:+11:=ra-.e:•aC*s.•e:" -,, ie. C. y`]I 31 1D R.®I 1D. �I IQ ■ iVal 1®RIi `D rAiriVB T� �0 4Or CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Neighborhood Meetings Three Neighborhood Meetings have been held to discuss the project. • May 9, 2016 • February 1, 2017 • August 17, 2017 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Appeal Following the Planning Commission's approval of the project, Hank Stoy filed a timely appeal of the project. His appeal focused on the decisions made by the Planning Commission related to the following items: • Variance to the Development Code • Environmental Impacts • Traffic • Wildlife • Riparian Habitat • Tree Removal Permit CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Appeal - Variance • "Some structures would exceed the 30 foot height limitation for buildings on slopes. Allowing these to be built would negatively impact the view from my property. The developer should be required to comply with the requirements of the Development Code." CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Appeal - Variance • Structures are proposed approximately 185 feet between existing and proposed structures. • Building pads for proposed structures are approximately 50 to 60 feet below existing structures. • The view angle does not create a condition that negatively impacts views of the valley, although it may block some views looking towards Foothill Boulevard. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Appeal - Variance 187'1'0 PROPOSED BUILDINGS 127 TO PARKING 1420 - 1380 1360 1340 1320 1300 1280 1260 5;r�frClrrr� 25 TO SLOPE PROPOSED - EXISTING GRADE GRADE PROPOSED PROPOSED Et' RETAINING WALL 2.1 MANUFACTURED 1 18.5' EXISTING BLDG EL. 1320' ROAD SLOPE TRACT BOUNDARY BLDG EL. 1373' -1420 1380 1360 13-00 1320 1300 -1280 1260 LOCATION OF BLDG, IN PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLAN CLOSEST TO P.L, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Appeal - Variance • The City does not have a view ordinance that restricts construction within view areas. • The applicant designed the project to minimize the view impacts to the existing neighborhood to the north by lowering the pad elevations, increasing the distance to the dwelling units, and reducing the number of total units. • Staff recommends the City Council uphold the decision of the Planning Commission and deny the appeal of Variance DRC2016-00207. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Appeal - Traffic • "An estimated additional 1042 daily vehicle trips would be generated on already heavily -traveled Foothill Boulevard. It would exacerbate problems at probably the worst intersection in the City —Foothill and Red Hill Country Club Drive. With only one entrance/exit and right turns only in and out, the numerous U-turns required on Foothill would create safety hazards. Cut -through traffic on Red Hill is bound to increase. Yet, no mitigation measures are being required of the developer." CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Appeal - Traffic • Linscott, Law & Greenspan, the project traffic engineer, responded to the comment. • The proposed project is expected to generate 1,042 additional vehicles per day (vpd) onto Foothill Boulevard. • Foothill Boulevard currently has an average daily traffic volume of 22,000 vpd in the vicinity of the project site and a daily capacity of 36,000 vpd. • Even though the proposed project will add 1,042 additional daily trips to Foothill Boulevard, the existing roadway has more than adequate capacity to accommodate the increase in daily trips associated with the proposed project. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Appeal - Traffic • The Traffic Impact Analysis identifies that under existing traffic conditions the intersection of Red Hill Country Club Drive and Foothill Boulevard currently operates at unacceptable Level of Service (LOS) F during the AM and PM peak hours. • Conditions of approval require the installation of traffic signage at the Red Hill Country Club Drive and Foothill Boulevard intersection to restrict northbound and southbound left -turn and through movements during the AM peak period (7:00 AM — 9:00 AM) and the PM peak period (4:00 PM — 6:00 PM). CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • Primary access "right -turn in/rid Foothill Boulevc • A secondary E access to Red I - rovided through a driveway off of (EVA) provides CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Appeal - Traffic • The TIA did provide a project cut-through discussion relative to the Red Hill Country Club Drive neighborhood. • Based on project trip distribution patterns, it was assumed that 20% of outbound project traffic would be considered new cut-through trips (i.e., 13 of the 64 outbound AM peak hour trips and 7 of the 32 outbound PM peak hour trips). • Staff recommends the City Council uphold the decision of the Planning Commission and deny the appeal of environmental impacts to traffic. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Appeal - Wildlife • "The impact on wildlife is unrealistically understated. For example, the red tail hawk (a protected species) frequently seen on Red Hill is not even mentioned in the biological resources survey." CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Appeal - Wildlife • RCA Associates, the project biologist, responded to the comment and identified that as part of their evaluation they documented all wildlife observed on-site during their field surveys. • Further identifying that the red-tailed hawk was not observed, and since the species is not listed as threatened, endangered, or a species of special concern a detailed discussion of the species was not provided. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Appeal - Wildlife • The high level of disturbance within the project site has resulted in low biological diversity, absence of special-status plant communities, and overall low potential for special- status species to utilize or reside within the project area. • Because no threatened or endangered species are likely to occur in disturbed areas due to the highly-disturbed conditions present in a predominantly degraded environment, construction activities in these areas would not likely jeopardize the continued existence of listed species, nor would construction adversely impact designated critical habitat. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Appeal - Wildlife • Impacts to disturbed areas would also not be expected to substantially affect special-status resources or cause a population of plant or wildlife species to drop below self- sustaining levels, nor would impacts be expected to substantially alter diversity of wildlife in the area due to the current degraded habitat conditions. • Project mitigation measures require Nesting Bird Surveys and Burrowing Owl Surveys consistent with the Fish and Game Code and the Migratory Bird Act prior to the issuance of grading permits. • Staff recommends the City Council uphold the decision of the Planning Commission and deny the appeal of environmental impacts to wildlife. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Appeal -Riparian Habitat • "Preservation of riparian habitat is a stated goal in the City's General Plan (Policy RC -8.1). But this project would destroy a considerable amount of it." CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Appeal - Riparian Habitat • There are two issues here, the potential for riparian habitat on-site and General Plan Policy regarding riparian habitat. r # r i� It I 1. II �{ �° -. « I I "YS'a*,.4 w '. tafr s ll: E I � i rye r -J+ r _ f'� y !Ji, r . 40° Appeal -Riparian Habitat • A Jurisdictional Waters Delineation was prepared for the project. • The jurisdictional analysis determined that the five existing channels do not meet the criteria as a Waters of the State or Waters of the United States. • The channels do not meet the characteristics that the define them as a nexus to the nearest Traditional Navigable Water, located approximately 0.4 miles east of the project site. • These waters are a direct result of runoff from the development directly north of the site. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Appeal -Riparian Habitat • General Plan Policy RC-8.1 addresses preserving "the integrity of riparian habitat ... and sensitive wildlife habitat that supports biological resources." • Here, the Jurisdictional Delineation determined that the five drainage channels that bisect the site are the result of runoff from the existing development to the north, that jurisdictional waters are not present, and that the project will not have an impact to any Waters of the State. • Staff recommends the City Council uphold the decision of the Planning Commission and deny the appeal of environmental impacts to riparian habitat. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Appeal -Tree Removal Permit • "This project would require removing 180 trees. To preserve the areas aesthetics and character, more mature trees should be saved. And it is difficult to believe that the nesting bird survey did not find a single nest in any of the trees slated for removal." CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Appeal -Tree Removal Permit • The Arborist Report evaluated 198 trees, 64 of which meet Development Code criteria to be classified as Heritage Trees, and 18 of those trees are recommended for preservation. • The 180 trees to be removed are over -mature, have poor growth character, advanced decay, some are dead or are in poor general health. • Several trees conflict with proposed improvements. • The Conceptual Landscape Plan demonstrates that the 180 trees removed will be replaced with a variety of 36 -inch box, 24 -inch box, and 15 -gallon size trees, in a quantity in excess of the number of trees removed. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Appeal -Tree Removal Permit • The Biological Assessment did identify the presence of common birds on the project site, but no threatened, endangered, or species of concern were identified. • Burrowing Owl and Nesting Bird Surveys were prepared, but did not identify the presence of any Burrowing Owls or nesting birds. • Project mitigation measures require Nesting Bird Surveys and Burrowing Owl Surveys consistent with the Fish and Game Code and the Migratory Bird Act prior to the issuance of grading permits. • Staff recommends the City Council uphold the decision of the Planning Commission and deny the appeal of Tree Removal Permit DRC2012-00673. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Environmental Review Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study (IS) of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that IS, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures related to aesthetics, agricultural resources, air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, geology and soils, greenhouse gas emissions, hydrology and water quality, noise, and tribal cultural resources there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) was prepared and was circulated on July 3, 2017. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Environmental Review One comment letter was received from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) on July 27, 2017 in response to the circulated IS/MND. The only comment CDFW had was in relation to the possible Jurisdictional Waters on the project site. The applicant and their biologists prepared a Jurisdictional Delineation to address CDFW's comments. The Jurisdictional Delineation determined that jurisdictional waters were not present on the project site, but recommended compliance with the CDFW recommended mitigation measure prior to issuance of any grading permit. The Biological Resources section of the IS/MND, was revised to include a mitigation measure requiring the applicant to provide proof to the City that the Streambed Alteration Agreement (1602 Agreement) process has been concluded. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Environmental Review According to CEQA Section 15073.5(a), recirculation of a negative declaration is required prior to its adoption when it has been substantially revised after public notice of its availability has been given pursuant to Section 15072. The IS/MND was revised to include a discussion of the Jurisdictional Delineation for the project site and a mitigation measure requiring a Streambed Alteration Agreement was added to the MND and the project conditions of approval. The addition of a condition of approval requiring a Streambed Alteration Agreement is not considered substantial evidence in light of the whole record that cannot be mitigated. Therefore, the Streambed Alteration Agreement mitigation measure is not a substantial revision to the MND, and recirculation of the MND is not required. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Correspondence • Letter received from Natasha Walton at the August 23, 2017 Planning Commission meeting. • Letter received from Charles & Lynda Teenor, dated August 29, 2017 (Attachment 12). • Letter from Shirley O'Morrow , dated August 29, 2017. • Letter from Pomona Valley Audubon Society, dated October 2, 2017. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Recommendation Staff recommends that the City Council take the following actions: • Adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project; and • Adopt the Resolution approving General Plan Amendment DRC2016-00206; and • Adopt the Resolution upholding the Planning Commission approval of Tentative Tract Map Modification SUBTT16605M, Design Review DRC2012-00672, Variance DRC2016-00207, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2012-00673 and deny the appeal. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Average Daily Trips in a 24 Hour Day (ADT) r Walmart Neighborhood Market • • • 0 a 0 ii10111° • FED HILL Future Signal & Alignment of Red Hill -wintry CidD • CLUB DR Project ADT — 1,042 . .„ ....„.„... . ,„....,.,„....„ San serriErdirio Rd Existing ADT - 22,000 • • • • • Existing ADT - 23,000 E 4D • Casa Volante Mobile Home Park Existing ADT - 25,000 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SYCAMORE HEIGHTS PACIFIC SUMMIT FOOTHILL, LLC City of Rancho Cucamonga August 23, 2017 Project Team • Land Planner — TRG Land, Inc. • Civil Engineer — David Evans and Associates, Inc. • Landscape Architect - David Evans and Associates, Inc. • Architect — Lim Chang Rohling & Associates • Geologist — Langan Engineering & Environmental Services • Traffic Engineers - Linscott, Law & Greenspan Planning Ofor Sycamore Heights • Work within the existing General Plan, Zoning, and physical planning parameters that came with the Property. • Create a community that meets the demand of the current Market for Multi -Family buyers. • Focus on the project edges and ensure that the views are owned by all who live in the community. • Provide a separate and distinct entry for the Community. • Elevate the Historical elements that make this area so special. • Create a walkable community including work live units. • Provide more parking than the current standards. • Locate multiple recreation opportunities onsite for the enjoyment of the residents. r OCi1•iu.r_w,y -Tayrx� Vl'=F.aDt�ilIE31'vd;--- Pacific Summit Foothill, LLC Site Aerial ,nIG DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES, INC - I, LANGAN ENGINEERING& ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES LIM CHANG ROHLING & ASSOCIATES Sycamore Heights Pacific Summit Foothill, LLC Site Plan Illustrative J DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. -land,., LANGAN ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES LIM CHANG ROHLING &ASSOCIATES Sycamore Heights CALLE CARABE SI Pacific Summit Foothill, LLC Features Diagram .DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES. INC I F LANGAN ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES LIM CHANG ROHLING &ASSOCIATES Sycamore Heights RETAIN DEAR GULCH IEC. CENTER ADJACENT OP ► FEATURE LANDSCAPED MANUFACTURED EDGE ROAD AND PROPOSED OPEN SPACE AGAINST 5YCAMORE INN Neighborhood Enlargement 3 LANDSCAPED MANUFACTURED SLOPE PARKING ABOVE STANDARD OPEN SPACE FEATURE PEDESTRIAN COURTYARD OPEN SPACE FEATURE '1; E.V.A.ITRAIL��" PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ALONG EDGE Neighborhood Enlargement 4 0.471 2.5TORY TRI-PLEX UNIT WI ARTICULATED ENTRIES E.V.A.1 TRAIL is L__ LANDSCAPED MANUFACTURED SLOPE TOT LOT 1 OPEN SPACE FEATURE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ALONG EDGE - MEANDERING TRAIL ALONG FOOTHILL OOULEVARD , PROPOSED REC. Bear Gulch Elevation BEAR GULCH TO REMAIN BEAR GULCH MANUF 1 PROPOSED MANUF. RES @'1282 SLOPE SLOPE 1 CENTER g1291 PARKING PROPOSED. ROAD @1287 PROPOSED. RES. @1291 BLOCK PERIMETER DL WALL ter'. PROPOSED PARKING LANE PARKING SYCAMORE INN @ 1272 RE5. @1281 MANUF.SLOPE 1 1 NATURAL Pacific Summit Foothill, LLC DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES, INC . Ian& LANGAN ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES LIM CHANG ROHLING & ASSOCIATES Section A Sycamore Heights PL VTUBULAR 'i STEEL FENCE C ' 3 -STORY TOWNHOUSE PRODUCT 5RET. WALLS +y k 11I -- 1 - IIP ti T NTS // NATURAL MANUF.SLOP£ / PROPOSED PROPOSED / 1 / EXISTING ROAD@1314 R.E5. @1315 R£5.@1370 X1 . Pacific Summit Foothill, LLC Section B AimDAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. and,,,LANGAN ENGINEERING 8 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Sycamore Heights LIM CHANG ROHLING 8 ASSOCIATES 3 -STORY TOWNHOUSE PRODUCT / PROPOSED RES. @1315 MANUF. SLOPE 1 10' 20' // 1 MANUF.SLOPE 30 `MSE WALL PROPOSED ROAD @1276 PROPOSED RES ga1277 Pacific Summit Foothill, LLC Section C DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. -I rvc LANGAN ENGINEERING &ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES LIM CHANG ROHLING &ASSOCIATES Sycamore Heights 5WALE 3'ROCK WALL WITH PLEXIGLA55 8' RET. WALL 4' RET. WALL PL MEANDERING WALK PROPOSED RE5 01277 20 PASEO (MIN. 151 MANUF. SLOPE FOOTHILL BLVD. 01250 MEANDERING TkAIL Pacific Summit Foothill, LLC Section D .IaDAVID EVANSANDASSOCIATES, INC. n LANGAN ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES LIM CHANG ROHUNG & ASSOCIATES Sycamore Heights PROPOSED / ROAD // 1420 — 1380 1360 1340 — 1320 1300 — 1280 1260 5ightline Sample Section 187' TO PROPOSED BUILDINGS 127' TO PARKING 25' TO SLOPE EXISTING GRADE PROPOSED PROPOSED J GRADE BLDG EL. 1320' 6' RETAINING WALL 2:1 MANUFACTURED SLOPE /I 11 TRACT BOUNDARY 16.5' EXISTING BLDG EL. 1373' —1420 - 1380 — 1360 1340 —1320 —1300 —1280 1260 * LOCATION OF BLDG. IN PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLAN CLOSEST TO P.L. PROPOSE❑ TRAIL CONNECTION COMMUNITY OUTREACH 1St PSF Plan • June 2012 — Meet with interested neighbors • October 2012 — Meet with interested neighbors • April 2013 — Present 1st PSF Plan to Red Hill condo owners Revised (Current) PSF Plan • March 2015 — Meet with interested neighbors to discuss revised plan • May 2016 — Community Meeting @ Sycamore Inn (current plan) • Feb 2017 — Community Meeting @ Sycamore Inn with staff (current plan) • Aug 2017 — Community Meeting @ Lions Center (current plan) Previous Plan (2006) / / / U / - / sr LEVET C.33 SEE SHEET,.`: ) - - / i •/ , ' / .---„. - ' --------., 11 --c, 1 : 7--'-..- 1 1 -.1 1 1 i - f. 1 L L _ _ _1 - - L - -L - _ -.4-- I I 1 i - •.____ a • No._,•.>" -- 541.1 IIERI“ P it -kW DJ • ,_.,....:•••%;;S•FreSTET + • • •• ....",••C''''';SEE SHEET • ESNEE SEESHEET • 9rEcTF---- Current Designations GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MIXED USE ZONING LLLYATIQZ ins ._w. •... .9 'E+ 9• .i0Y6iAS•y4. 4fYdu. yyr _#•9rt.•NT nN• w'{1PR1 Rear Elevation Right Elevations SYCAMORE HEIGHTS Sui'nrnit 1- ,oi Sill, LLQ. 2 -STORY TRIPLEX ELEVATIONS! Santa Barbara -1.5 trutIU.YGiebmw.. F .0 ..5.3 PLAN 2 PLAN 3 M. PLAN 1 itOiono ItLdl ar- SYCAMORE HEIGHTS Pacific umnnit Foothill, LLC sv xxnbw 1 S. 2 I 6 4— • •' r PLAN 2 PLAN 3 4 M 1 .f M RIM (lade M"" 71p& %-B CONSTRUCTION R -E OCCUFk rcv Pian 1 1.208 SF Pian 2 1.540 S oan_a 1.70l SF ted 4,537 S LOT COVE RVU 3,52'O SF 2- STORY I -FLEX: BUILDING PLANS A -1.L }LEYh7TON NOTES 4,8 • .i+C- .4—.51 sx iya t-% a_ - w .Y _a "+ +4).TP F We. 4▪ ' 4h9'4'.P 4.4. • S F WF a r G ' auk .x+PLG �G4" ✓ ' w ro.rwuao•v Mao ', • .x} 9 hx=J'C.a!-!•+f.Z. . Y- A AMA • - ▪ wi. Y-A�A'A'4`S' Front Elevation Left Elevation SYCAMORE HEIGHTS 2 -STORY TRIPLEX ELEVATIONS; Santa Barbar A-1,4 Pacific Sumtnit Foothill, LLC .is 41-10. I`.:4ii4. to Li4Gb5wi*i 4S'.1.7 F1 EVATKIN VOHS c•-lmbn 14.41} 11.441.el. Ze•NtlEVI 41ide. • 4±1. t. .44Lill." 41. - lbw} Front El evati on Le ft E I twat i on SYCAMORE HEIGHTS 2. STORY TRIPLEX ELEVATIONS: Provence A-1.6 Pacific Summit Foothill, LLC 74114. tni.cius.GivAkr1-45Wirl fLEVATEN MIMS • 3 't. 2.134.122 L •••••.1••••!....0.4. .1 S,.lttA 4*AO 1 •••••13C.P. 3.31T. .71 *YAK len Ilihm 1.71. 3.14.1.......•Esw • 3 ...3.40 3.1%...1P130.6 1.1.1•101.3 • I.••••;..•••• 7.a] E•314.0••.4 •ThS .••••••13. PE•35 tif 1.1 NM, 1...351 Rear Elevation Right Eicvat ion SYCAMORE HEIGHTS • e‘;-.• 2 -STORY TRIPLEX ELEVATIONS: Provence A-1•7 Pacific Summit Foothill, LLC - FFLAW 3A PLAN 1A PLAN 2A PLAN 28 PIAN 1B PLAN 3B au ir6R8:f SYCAMORE HEIGHTS Pacific Summit Foothill, LLC sv xxnR7 1$, 2446 •1161 k6Cm • • Prt • ,1?/1 I� I PAN ig PLAN 38 7r ij r =SAP: T1FE Y -B CONSTRUCTION 13-2 ()CCUPANCY Plan IA 1/172 SP Flan 113 1.1117 $P Plan 2A 1.1i74 SF Plan 2$ i.e95 SF Pled OA 2, WO SF Flaa 38 2,08.3 Si 3 -STORY TOWYItOMES: BUILDING PLAYS A-2.1 .1.E.• ••31:1•1. . EY 4.14441.41.P. 94.1 I. iW AL 114:1Z6 ILIME _ UMW Nik.S fl 11:=1. na Ra•ul •• • •11 PLAN 151.1 MEEE011 RUM. TEA% LI: 1,1131' flt •MI•lar ••• • • nax aa, ntn FUME SYCAMORE HEIGHTS lovas aar roan FIL 14AQI. • ,;." • FLA% threN1). . rux 1 1.11217_111,1}* MOLE •91:1. OFT, 3 -STORY TOWNHOM ES UNIT PLANS A-2.2 Pacific Summit Foothill, LLC 1. LER\I RIGHT FA, EV, TION LEFT ELEVATION SYCAMORE HEIGHTS Y'1�..yjl/ 'Y�'1.'..'.y.!1I1�4� i';4j ��:k;4'�i•'i�I ..ii'�Ij.',��FI'ky� F.1.1;1' .•e'�t�!"'1i�-".'I.'. 11 +i. .1. ;MM..] h REAR ELEVATION I R[ 1\ 1 1.L_lLVAI Ii:. 3`STORY$IXPLEXELEVATIONS! EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A-2.3 Pacific Summit Foothill, LLC \v.aadx I7L, €I6 PLAN 3A PLAN 1A PLAN 2A PLAN 2B SYCAMORE HEIGHTS PLAN IA FLAN 2A 1 PLAN 2B L®GUD: R-2 OCCUPANCY Ilan SA 1.911 SF • 2-1 SF" .COMMEIVIZAL _ 1.165 Sr Ilan IA 1,531 SF + 849 Sr COSISSFRC3AL = 1,780 SF P]fn 2A 1.7$2 SF + 2}9 Sr CO1iISF.R4:L L = Z.0311 SF PI4n 2B 1.71.9 SF # 249 SF C0IISSFINIAL = 2.04 SF 34TORYLIVM'iORICTOWNILQ.13E : BUILDING PLANS A-3.1 Pacific Summit Foothill, LL ti ' I Nv ciNw MIS lair atewh3J 44.116i - SYCAMORE HEIGHTS Pacific Summit Foothill, LLC Novwfte 1$. 2446 1 a El 1 • EEi i EEi i r.rrlw.sw 3 -STORY LIVEAVORK TQWNH QMES: EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A-3 !plllui� Illi I LEFT ELEVATION NI Nll! I N hIIII' ..E 111 . �.. ..I m 111 ..1 J' �� iii ...... ,;; ,�y, FRONT ELEVATION SYCAMORE HEIGHTS EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Pacific Summit Foothill, LLC June 23, 2015 ,LIQ] CHANG ROHL]N i S ASS �; IA'. E - . . -.'•'°!, .. . . leir 4; i--, 4'. 0. ; Mell .-7.-.:• '41 .,. ..1"-I'L •'•••: • ••• . • • •-•.'.' g;:...111 ... ..mmoir...-, —.___N I, ,gi,,, -•‘• --". :•• • .. .• .* • ..„.., •s,;.-, • _ ,17...-' • ••• ::-..-,..• ..? .."f*„.. - * ..-,r, • . .. ... '.`" "' 1,...,71' -z.:,:: ..."-..,4, \fei.-,.... • --. --4.---..., . 1.....i ••. . Ike ..__ .. . • • • • A11111.-- _.4ci!- .- •-• . , ••, ' ., Ir. • • — • - N .-,.. „,...!;',. .- .„ '.t. • ...;:i.J 1 - . , ••,.: .. .•- • . ..:•„:". 41.,..: •:. _ •- _ _. • 4? - .1/2. _ _ ' .. ; ; • 4. . .._.... , . -.. ... . - ..___•.__ i. N .,,,,, - 'Lila-- - PRIV , •,., . ., ..,_ — _ . --- .' . ... - ..._ ,..i.-. .J.' ..r• • '!.. i F ••2• , , - • . -= - — - !...• .1 • II' '" 'C .=-.- ..i...1'..........,j....•.:.: ' • tITr '' - r -4_'7 -'':. '_ - '..•..-.--. -'•- - j •••::' ‘•%,•:, . . . - . • •••• . ,.f . . t RED HIL .....` le •-P. ..47A.4E '. r..4 6 ..-,!' .. - . •4 ..1::; 7.' . • . .... 0 :::.,7f,..-• .-• ' • •;... • ,••• ••:••'it• . .,,„ .. it, ., 4-0,-.4. ,. I 1 •.. WI, , . • . ... - . 1.- -3, t ' • . . Pe', .....< Ad.. ' FA.t. ,, ...V ---- _ -r'7 '. .t.• ! .. i.i1 ..-‘,•.. ...5.•r0Ii'M_1.1 te.. "- :. e.•••- • is ,Y 1.-• ....:. .A. • I — F . ; i .. , • 1 t--,-. !. • c.,.„._7_: r11• c, . • _.' •.4711: . APL1 "'tilt: ,....• .: : • I ..,,, • i7,, .7 .w4f.,_.?,... .„.. oi-i— - • • z "-'-`1... ...(----IrTry.71717 Li - .-/'• '- - . • ..... .. •Zt ., . Ill •)•-_,'''' - L....y. ,..„'...1 •i ..• 4 . • ; LZ •C , ... .. , .. ' ,. • ..,\*,,i ' .. , : ji"... • s•t-... , •••,--4, • . ' et '9.,.. 4 I i * k '.- - . 4r_...ew,,!•• ,...0.. li• ' ' . ...* .r . •-! • - ---4 , P .1... •••,-• 44'1,.. 1:: • ....': • it.. . ..., . .f ... - . 41 , •rd .. .•• '1, . . •••• ' it- -74 ••:•.ijliill"-- .:. . .. ' •,• !•-,..'... - • . :',. - = ;. 4 -......... . ,.. • -•-,.. - , ". ' El•P - ' a. .... • - STOP. pig ...... 2••_•••• ...ST...-. "iy' ''''P' ' - , SAN BERNARDINO ROAD f,i'f•• '45 ,t‘ reichk.. 4To or. ' /4... - -..e, ' • • • - - .. " Ar-. • 4.: !, ... '...., ".•:!!. :11 .411 ! ....t '"..., 4 . ; ik. #• i 71 . - • ... . '''"-- -," --ki,- " ?-..1 '-:'.• ---. .... HISTORIC RTE 66 i.- ---.. • .• ._ „. : .,.. . .• .. T.:, • ps) • • ...,, .. • 4...*P' 1g.--- •.' ..t,... ,f5t.r. ...:, . ' Slk :- iItEF. . . 0 ; 1." -F. f ..A. - N• —.) il:•,..', .' —0 M ,• •- • "4 -".2:" „.{ 'Z _ ..11.•,..NIMI. , , - ......,... •,_..._ r. ....1.:".- .:•07, .,..,. • --• ._ 14.1 . '.,.k„..- 0 . ,...--3, . ,...3-4T7'. ..a- -k, t - . S:'-, r .. - .•• .• ;"/4--41— - — ."--. • : _ -.4. • et ' --. .-. _ • Pacific Summit Foothill, LLC Grove Avenue Aerial A. DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Jorid.. LANGAN ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Syca more Heights UH CHANG ROHLING &ASSOCIATES LIN5E�7T LAW $ GREEN SPAN f�Q1 cels AIN SCALE KEY APPROACH LANE ASSIGNMENT 4 TRAFFIC SIGNAL P — PARKING, NP F NO PARKING U LENDI4ADED, ID DOMED 2 . KUMBER OF TRAVEL LANES (XA at POSTED SHIED UNIT ($APED PROJECT SITE FIGURE 3 -1 EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS AND INTERSECTION CONTROLS SYCAMORE HEIGHTS. RANCHO C ICAMONGA j / 3 { J 1 L 71 / r c !I\ 1 \ / C.oo _ \ 96 `s a ,` '2N i , 2° ', \ 542-- GRDVE FOOThN1 _ e ri:1 \ 6 c a .., 1 A ST Q REO #4U COUNTRY CLUB DR 0 CAMEL AN 6LyD FOOTHILL DOM RER FILL COUNTRY ! rt! �° ST 0 SAN B(R+ ARDIND RD 0 CLUB DR FOOTHILL BLW 0 i fr 8 t _ CLUB DR Rtd HLLL J.:....:. L — T e G2 0 !ONS BLVD F 711\ `iC g 3 •—_ i .L- ham• i -.� F B�g�I p�y���y p� GGRNAr DINO RD 1 5 "' � Ld s w Y c rn i.z.Q Z e EY i L1�15CoT7 LiREEHSP.N .2. PROJECT SITE FIGURE 3 - rO SCALE F n! n c e r 5 EXISTINGAM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES SYCAMORE HEIGHTS. RANCHO CUICAMONGA 1 if Tom_ #� f) 11./-91 ,., , ................„, c13g\ J• am# IL + \ s. J i (,-- 1 v \ /"`� 1 i if �� 1 J \ 5T 0 SAIL CLUB DR _ 6 j f ,- fi 1 / Gd i i m1 4. BERHARDUTD RD 0 FOOTHILL 6L ) _ _ . BLVD __, 0 s N { 1 I 1, \ \229Th`'--J 24-1 1092- GROVE FOOTHILL . ST 0 COD /f �1 i "a o / \f$ / RED lisli COUNTRY CLU OR 0 CARNE JAN FOOTHILL OM REO FELL CCUMTRY Cita dig REI? HILL:: RED MILL COUNTRY r 4rllr k I alta DR (NORE-I) a z, j x t +' r# FOC1Hia aL' LINSCOTT LAW 8 GREENSPAH enl}Afels fl[ll�ill�l�, Np SCALE KEY r- r APPROACH LANE ASSIGNMENT TRAFFIC SIGNAL • YEAR 2035 8UJLR]OUT PLANNED IFIPRQ DENTS PROJECT SzTE FIGURE 8 -1 YEAR 2035 BUILDOUT PLANNED IMPROVEMENTS SYCAMORE HEIGHTS. RANCHO CUICAMONGA f Ie —� k 1 r ▪ 11 -. I [__-_7 1� ' !'l1 ▪ - \ 3144 -WAY S ilmo i v i Ft}+1 - ']I 14 • _ STOP _ _ SUM -ti CM k4! ill RED r LL coup mr CLUB DR 0 CAROM ST • NAM kRIIJARTOINE RI5 4 1' 1NMY +4: FOGINILL LII .1 Fi 11P 1 iS AT7r '11; ere nOJII'I# Mee LfNSCOTT LAW 8 GREENSPAN enp}naers KEY -F— y APPROACH LANE ASSIGNMENT • - TRAM SIGNAL - EXISTING 111TH PRO,]ECT SCALE RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS _ PROJECT SITE NOTE [A1 INSTALL 511.3.11AIM TC' 1.E T I{'T NORT1BOUND M40 SOU THEID1,INI] Lg7-11.1R14 AND TliRCLJGH MOVEMENTS DURING THE AIy1 +SND FIGURE 8 — EXISTING WITH PROJECT RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS SYCAMORE HEIGHTS, RANCHO CU AMONGA . - . I' ) .. . ..e i 4.-._ \ . IL L_ / -4.. •- I 14 'P ' f-1 1 IA 4 I 1 . . —4, _ wisikit 1,4)/11414 • -....4,.. I -- 4 - -- . 1 ' ' _.--. j/T ... ..H&c: \ TWO-WAY •121.4 "*.... .,.. SIOR -.... _ ..... — 4Ve • RED MIL CCUPIIIRY CLUB DR * -40.01MliAn %NV FOCHILL DLI ,[11.1111.1,. 0.).1411qY1.1.'S CL 40 i .''N 4 . P 4 LI, '''s , S ilmiv 'r Flo ILL Maikki. % ..._ =NU -....._ _ ST a Xiiii,J IMMlFI Fir5• 07' MOR 1 Li (11 WO 0 i F. CI_LII3 DR v .-7--...7.7 RED HILL ............".............. BLVD g 5. , ---- - - • .7,.... " ....,:,:••:F.i,:,V.,:'0"- -.--vi.-.....:•:• .....'::> wi..X.r..:..- .. .. ...... .. 0.) • r •;.....•:::-,-• ...1:?" BERNARDINO RD i } ..t a. L.., ....e .... m Y.. -- KEY Nom LI.NSCOTT,„.„..,,, -4-- • APPROACH LANE ASSIGNMENT (*1 instmi 3.C.NAGE TO RE.,PRICT FIGURE 8-3 LAW & er111111A, 0 - TRAFTLC BIDNAL NORTHBOUND. MO .501,.ITHBO1ND LVI-71LIF04 ANCF rrIft•CIUH -•— • VZAR 2018 441TH pRcxEcr GREENSPAN CPI RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS MOVEMENTS nurolo T1-1 MA 0 SCALE rvi nag PIMICOS. YEAR 2018 WITH PROJECT E0 = PROJECT SITE RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS englniers SYCAMORE HEIGHTS. RANCHO CUCAMONGA tri - ,_ I � 1 r- ' / - -----, 1 1 E.'- -,.- * •r1 . 'x' 'so F--[..1.1. ',I • PC %1L PitINIPY lei $IILL EI X. 41 11 fi le_WI 1 II A t TIPPLA 6Lito { LMI1SC YfT LAW E ERE PAN eoglrielits ANN IlleTao SCALE KEY a APPROACH LANE ASSIGNMENT • = TRAFFIC SIGNAL. s YEAR 2O35 KIILROUT WITH PROJECT RECOWMENOED IMPRQVE1r1EM1-S BM= PROJECT SITE FIGURE 8-4 1 YEAR 2005 BUILDOUT WITH PROJE T RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS SYCAMORE HEIGHTS. RANCHO CUCAHONGA I r , ice / �---' / [414,1113t 04111 _ _ > tl - 110 u[ / naw ppp.� IP P.,. ply Rg 'y nN--�-- ymrc :40. ------ j p' l�` . /.1 �L• •npL der MIME ---7---' ;VA''''''''' erh. -- ' I '1 �, rE' / // / / \ I �,,� (.--,...-- lora e 4r C11.1-54. MOM NW. r:mp pox .a1�ih, - r __ __ _ , :I....,.,,,,,, . Y (+� MII ckm� le IV Iter , . . r..... [Am. ,M . m.. .m�.c ea Mees .Mb `�N r. i 1 > bV 1 li ... SYCAMORE HEIGHTS, RANCHO CUCAMONGA � O• / , J® I ����� SUB TT 16605M S DRC 2012-tX 73 Q�r .�0,'...', _'nsaoc'^TEs"'- as-1� TREE SURVEY EXHIBIT x mi tYI, _ Ppwe WEST• �,:asSM� s. ., y� 2 Ms x awm upc9mm� �,— -emr . a,,—�1 a IAN Sr 191111 o,1 z CAREW POW j/ UMW PER. Elk ii °.. Prili9ARD UM. 3.1.111,43011 Of, MOM, 0.CE 1110. 0.17r - SYCAMORE HEIGHTS. RANCHO CUCAMONGA SUB TT 166051y1 8 DRC 2012-00673 TREE SURVEY EXHIBIT EAST i•. ntr -msae atm �2 a 2 SITE UTILIZATION PLAN •••• viow,,, lip, .,...::, "--- ,./ ,,K -4,. -. - • .7 •-•' - % 1., 4 1 ....''• 4 (4,4or ;4 \X• eill0"L''' '-'-'' '' fr''' ' '''''' ' ' . .I4 ,Z4' 401V IP' • . -4;,,-- ,40" 3—:14'3,'-',P__.:"2_,:";41_,,' 7;.;•-•''ia"rtlitt'_.•, • * . i 4. t 0,0, //, ilk GOLF COURSE . • , • , .,, t _,,..,........ .1 f .•-• Ai .7, . -,, 4..,I". •• • ,, ,. , y g. . ,... 7` - -' • 1•114, .44. .. x 4' )15 '",:', —A, - ,. , • i L . , .. , ,10: , .. ,- k,.. `- ''," - ‘ I • - ••• .: ik‘ , ' '' , ... ,. ,•''' ,4•:.F ' • •• '''`I• ' ,, "4"6.' • LO7 1. r ...- ..1511.4, . , ...- , A ' P. 4 ,, • .... I...Km.. 1,11.1,0011 21(13 / RESIDENTIAL •'•••t- • COUNTRY CLUB DR- dilta '45.4` -.-•;.44' ... - :tED "''''.. •- '.- - , . ZALLE CA-RAI4 6, "t -.. . , . / "-.....A.' n '74"tor,:r . . •-'' ' ..; I 4. . / •"--1 .; / " ( 1.4. , '''' w• r 444144%. - . 1 I .. 'FAOT/Tite • 07--101-4-1 , •'..." ,. ''-' ... .",,T•I''..F4'.."...y" ..1",,10.1 .1/V . 57166... ' PWL111/ .971110 C1.11 .• . ,.......- 2O7 - 207-ILI- .._______--- . • : - . .....• • • ''''' • . i \ . IL 441 Oi• % OL,...0,1,..... 'Z'..77,..,.. MTN ' , . ''' ' 11' -..%. ,wilk •! ri - MP" BOW /1I F11.116CD FLO. 4 • 1 .• - / ' 7 , . : ' ...ole,i;,..4* . ./..... . I •1 le‘'° '''''' I ' '-- ,. ..1i ---.' - .,, .. cepsim ' ......"‘ 1 '' • '' WI* ._,, 1.I . k SAN BERNARDINO ROAD . - •••• ....^ •"` • ----.. 114` PAWN , % r.''''...--42.-*2' . ...,-..***.' ...-- -, ., -., t t t -1•-, •11 ...,. v . ------<-1'.'" . '''. ''..-L•A'''' L -I , 4411=Ai.,,420 •••!, .1C ".•••-•.:,... _=..,j,. , ..".., . ..._ - 0! • 44...Ark, *W. -......t „ hi •!- AMP > D'•.cil. "'"""*' ' . 47 "..-01.4:N,,a,., • , A- • "41-, ”" " mu - -t _ . .:. ...?,:.--- •F'''- ,---. OFFICE/COMMERCL IA ' A '-`1 • .... . - , RESIDENTIAL, • '' .• . lal ...../' ...... , M .../...-'... wx.• N.A. A 0.. I, •"•,•••••1 , , , 41, '''''s r,1,...- , .-'4.36...-V. 4 . - ^....• ... AiK V V.;;F:62, tts".- ".. V._ • • N [11 SUBTT16-605 ORC2012-004372 I! II PANS NV AM refe --X1 201 1 nworn 9.41.9.2111 COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO I 1 i ..m........ols SITE UTILIZATION PLAN I; PACIFIC SUMMIT FOOTHLL. LLC SYCAMORE HEIGHTS RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA SU 1.1 '. ...... .. A 4.,... TETNTATIVE TRACT MAP NO, 1660S -1 SITE PLAN ------1-1 1 _f__---, /-7 -1'1 IIII -----m--''''42 ,,, '1-.- , Llt:,4t ____*_,:-='-:.• ."fr •••- ;,•`". •• Po • „ •• , . .••• - i alt• hr. - rk•r•••os: -•"<" fi 1 ....,.„ t c • wn tow. • AN DERNARDND BRE SLAIMARY• NEI .111.4 IS• SULAM SUMMAgf, r WEN WOW 4104 I • PAPKII0 19PiNCESUINAFIYF mt. ••• Ma. .1.••••• •••••• eon Es 4114. 41.51[1.1.1. 1- - - - ..M1114 Cm11,m1p 11.11414 I.41. 11•=1.31.1.• 11. •••014.er WM. •••••• 'maw. .• twat Mao Fl Acts"oll .•111. WPC SLEITT1 1311.015 uRczo1Z-IN4172 PACIFIC 111.001t FOOTI.Lis /.4 .41. iss 444 LA • Um_ ••••••••..••••• 11.m....161•1•11 ata•••••• 111.14.11 41411 5411.0144 Il• 1.4 • MIN 161. CZONTY CIF EIMO BZ040 LR 111 31TE MAN SYCAMORE MEOWS MACHO CLICNola434 TENTATOJE IFIACT MPNO• "MS SP -1 1 e PARKING STUDY REIM. IN, FO\ SYCAMORE wi FEST AWAIT ORAS) SAN BERNARBifNO JW 1"'2a, --' PARKING SPACE SUMMARY YAG EN OR Y MAUS svrAWNE 000 P.. Lf �- PO0140 50 001 LEGEND /8L 13 y• r p6 C$ N 1 BD 0 A yl 5UBTT16605 0RC2012-00672 PACIFIC SUMMIT FOOTHILL LLC Pnw nvE, o Fr" 026) 2,-B1913 OYZOLIInli 50450NS morHall & Foreman COUNTY OF SAN SERNARDINO PARKING EXHIBIT SYCAMORE HEIGHTS �wroR RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 'SF3 .— TETNTATNE TRACT MAP NO. 16605 041511n500 00/50 A. It AIMP PE RIMOAS 01/05/4014 SP -1 r 1 PEa�O a �wP O P.M =MD Pwuuc 7-000 PER WC WPu 105,wows MR x4 SINCE/ USSERAOMY PRIM 050)84 +,s n Ha Amway aRAND Mito II my! 0.YP0PlAl PAWS a8/0S IMRI 4/1.00, 50 0740S Y 0 OSA A0 51.6 YAG EN OR Y MAUS svrAWNE 000 P.. Lf �- PO0140 50 001 LEGEND /8L 13 y• r p6 C$ N 1 BD 0 A yl 5UBTT16605 0RC2012-00672 PACIFIC SUMMIT FOOTHILL LLC Pnw nvE, o Fr" 026) 2,-B1913 OYZOLIInli 50450NS morHall & Foreman COUNTY OF SAN SERNARDINO PARKING EXHIBIT SYCAMORE HEIGHTS �wroR RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 'SF3 .— TETNTATNE TRACT MAP NO. 16605 041511n500 00/50 A. It AIMP PE RIMOAS 01/05/4014 SP -1 r 1 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP Na. 16605 FOR CONDc*AINIUM PURPOSES 1 COUNTY OF SAN BERN AROINO GITY PF FIANIGHP GUGAMGNGA. GA mai ILL L:ii:N SfAr,; Rec. HILL CCIVNTRY OLUBL OIifVE... - • -�/ r � Fr--rrT,ti r. rrTr�. • •:,'• • ni I • L 0 yIIT� . 2 t L O T 8 1 • LOT 4 L•-:.lY.L: :7.ip•4� 1 L - t f 15T, K„A; wr e7<xp .1—'C Wl RPY•4� SAN SERNASC514O r a:331157MAtt` 1=5°. 55.5r STE BJAAARY, um on MO MA u• nude LOT AFEA SU 4.1. AY MY TO 1.14 4111 11. ul Ge* IAL NOTES4. line RAM= PSI Rug wino au 444 awns n 444 or a mu mow. SUEITTr06c ORC2012-00872 PASSC WAIT FOOTHLI.IAO •unnt'uann L°0� 1440.00 untit .M1111.01 °outcry or SAN SCRNARDI NO TENTArryE TRACT MAS TWOS SYCAMORE FEISITTS RANZ440 CUICAMONGA. CA • TIM ••1 1.2 i; GRADING PLAN GENERAL NOTES '""‘"' 'in -NI ItA-11:1 gmleY.'3.1rAtZiAln:1?" ""'"67MT1721,1"tiznnr==r; 11,4%12i:24- ,V,,05-TrE '.:""."r277111,VM .1:11747:4`SEET°1:"7.7,71-"Z","i!'air-fll'itFiT"' ° :,,tirdr1,7-1714116STapftlCAliiirer-LIMIT.."%'4., ' "°"0,VirFAVAIITA10.=. ?".14` uo,-4+21parxe.ArhaiT., =,fa IL 1.1F1.11.5 IRV MM., MO Fir....+:11,,NE7.713.1:41-2,ralF741"1":" 27,6,.."7:FeEZT,.1`.1;:11-71=rgt".ffl.7:7=7'17.11t "Vf.N"L":."4•ZrZAL:710=1==4:4"rgr.A1,-,,,:',VAr " = .7.E0arariitrAl."ET Z'AVO-n0.9,17:4•01r T.0 .91LIVI',N " wet " Er.,177.,:4z4vntra..=r,,Frtm " rora,rp,r,z-mtzanr "-- iFirehenlacri7=--."117="2. " Brair0,2ror,?0`1=-; =NI MIttjt&f.11:TIL Wrotk N. ours.r.3 Ian in. ix. nu, a .11.1,11msnegr nuns taro or thnmonit St7Z7Rrt777.7kragingfgozNI,r4,7,Avr„„71 IS i3 aan 141,411Fouilz ozkinIn az a a avarva HIlL COUWERTir 0.1133 T C9 CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN SYCAMORE HEIGHTS RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO.16605 - Iln-C.• '..r." - ------4 YtlY: i" .1 ! lb Kr ilk ifei , _ • 'Fop Llimp _. Ts ` , ' w• ..--- ' ,...- ___,------ ,r -- EAST FOOTHILL BLVD- r — ----I I T ---:.,—----- -I— • 1 1-'''-- -..- L 1 1 wcomORE re4 FlEgrALBAKr NAP.) INDEX MAP Ni A SHEET INDEX tf_SOWNI IITLE SHEET CDICE,TLML GIADING C.1055-SELTOIS SKr NC,. UNE, ABBREVIATION UST nn 1CINI7 MAP ILEILITYPLIRVEYORB =MM. 1-11Per— SENCHNIAM :#1.341:4,741;'7.4.,,'L"P MEM OF BEARNG EARTHWORK ]TE INFO SUBTT1S605 DRC2012-0D672 SD LS ENGINEER / GEOLOGIST REVIEW Te sfm.a .361r i'LW, ZIT! Ell=orolf '"Nra=1:3.3%""' t4. BEM-, P4 EAT co,E1.1.1101,14 NrE LANGAN D0,161/OC.,101, PACIFIC SUMMIT FOOTHILL, LLC =litrKlirll 04. PM, 0, KAPP , COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLANS svcAmonE HEIGHTS RANCHO LIC.,,,MONGA CA TENTATIVE TRACT MAP ND 1E503 TTTLE SHEET EITE ,27,2ous CG -1 10. EXISTING SLOPE ANAL:1 SN: SYCAMORE HEIGHTS RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA/ J f USL flBiE SLOPES ON THS Elo-r&T'ACRE CALCULATED BY TAKING RISE OVER RUP {Df fEREIOE iN azarim DIWCED BY THE ELSIVICE KNEED POUTS). &VCE ALL SLOPES KBE CALEBLA1E& A CLOSED HARD WAS •SSIMO TO EADt SLOPE RAHCE LISTED P1 INE TABLE ABOVE. 114 TAO-PWIENMOl AL AREA CP EADI SLDPE RAKE IS ASO PDO 111 THE TAB1E ABM. 1.111 ST r. tee SAN San C.6r..I Reunl.lna 11 ,DIND NAT \ONAL FgREST •' s f �. neve, n benvn, 1 CITY OF 'FONTANA 1 CITY DP UPLAND n. _nnneiry •`il m—S rakzeis cm Aria, metig TrariMIt WHIM i - - Jtfr onWrburigit Ikka --i a .c3L3I e�� y •i—� f� •liJ rllnr• ! I• n I lit::. :L.I>n1� RIFF ij ounft.Ve aea CITY OF ON TA R I0 WHILI 11131711 w��1 OFF Prim RM=itt =111■■1 .1 _E' " �llf 5 F.nSI ea,. Mer Mal Pala rlanornananr• CITY OF FONTANA Auhfic Heakh end Safety SANCFIO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Previously located in Section 21.2 Gelogic Hazards SLfpee - Slopes greater Than 30% HecCn fled w rem.nas wen 1paee w reduce The e menlial for Nora In6Tatilty and dCtwis A0.1 ® Slopes between 10%40% RegInn where NIInde denIgn lard 04dnTg puitljrrea ehom6 be Irnpsnen6a Lane IeYls Slopes leas than 10% Npspecial hillside recwnmendaFons are reQNred- -'-- P.endm GlNngrgB C+l1' N0und$ry ---• sonars d nnudxa RANC:IIO CCCA MON GA Changed from: ''No development is permitted in these areas, unless all the following are satisfied: 0) the property is Ionated south of Banyan Street; (ii) at least 75% of the lots or parcels that are subject of the development application are surrounded by lots or parcels improved with structures; and (iii) the proposed project is determined to appropriately address slope stability and other geological factors of the site." 1 awe lawmen b based on regional , on/ e.6 speak :as neer fasn]aies eft be rAN2e6 b/ Ile agar aggien.. 2 &len %trod. cutlr.Val Lkrd p.111 rrpadrg an)�w.s�IM 8K torn.tidadeK cIN40.s Swore: DipEd RendioTD ve0A $006•r4.T Omegas rcwnalanat 2lOI 410 00 0-45 05 1 2 Figure PS -4: Slopes PS.19 • i CONCEPTUAL UTILITY PLAN • ' I j 6T"JtLeFe III. TEETPURANT Q1APJ • SAN BERNARDINO R6 LASliala Tinto Ma Gal lb AP=„1r la xW ti UIF. I _Ilii- r.::c lla hAI,,.4 L, 0111 cm nNzooloo -on PACIFIC SLMNIT FOOTHILL. LLC i SIJ6Tr1 0605 QRC20,2-00677 5 OUNrY SW Cor- orarmIND cR CONCEPTUAL UTLIT' PIAN INVgq TS) S+'CAMORE FEIcHTS NANC.Y.7 CUCAMONGA CA TVNTATryE MAUI MAP NO. 18605 4T CtJ-i r 2 WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN CLL R, C A R A E R 1 cr -04 -�h ir k:[211- BMP{8] PROY191O14 NOTES: 15=5"'....�. BMP RI€RARC 4Y SUMMARY Ei• �,,....IRX4..1.-,«,.1 MLK+O.�11.-L#17R.. n ,,. ...I}... Mid .4 .w�� —— 1XMW SYCx410RE 1EIGHT . RAXLl1a 0761.51ChraA lEYTATTYi TRACT HS °e1ar. iy PERVIOUS AREA MAP ' POST -DEVELOPMENT CONDITION CALLE'.Y C,1 7Af3F. (:T - _J .L SAN BER?ORDJNO 105- ` "� /� �„- 1 LEGEND: LEGEND: I I S MInhaus DAM wow NKR 1.1.1 .1661.E. UAL ERCOP nre AREA SUMMARY, 1 ok rusenZlimmu oral -Ito SYCAMORE HEIGHTS, RANCHO CUCAMONGA TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 16605 w.w 142 1-6 PERVIOUS AREA MAP POST -DEVELOPMENT CONDITION EXHIBIT "L1” crqu 2 r 2 4,k } J L�Ltr; 1•w, ' Ft, �� I� ,Y ..AI,y k rmoi '��• � f- R `.jai. -%I L. L .fid 1 r.r _ • 21 r, V�li � 1 • -' s.J '-"IN i 1 •..mr, SubjectSite 1sl�'t , I F '•�`• � i t/�� t. __ , t L �^ ,,4 2.J� I' Zit IN, I��II ilr 'J 4` *i�`4 • t�_ l: 11 . f i•• �Y ,'0. {1 _- A _' _.—. • • MU IMI1 _ N Source: USGS Year: 1968 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH 8410 & 8462 Foothill Boulevard Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 FIGURE3 Job No: 284253 f' 'AEI — ;� y - - OR � ,► �' "!T ' _ ` . ' , •J - E ..: f„Y , q. s•g'^,7"° i�3}i cll�` Y R :Jr: :`k2A' 6 1'i� y.s".� '. r5 �� ~ i•... • w r. - .1 .... :17 !: ry 4 c II 1•. V • illP M , till , .0 '� nimy . 4'�� �7rpf S , r ,k sup,, 1 t:,i ad t ro �j - 3i l .. x .fir. 5. -, t t yr r1�ij�, Ar-i �T(' • t . 41 47 ir Ir.: ' ...1: T sari „Ile: _- l f • moi• r : m .:E.. 1%1 / Source : i1SGS Year: 1977 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH 8410 & 8462 Foothill Boulevard Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 FIGURE 3 Job No: 284253 f.' AEI ,•,. tr.. i i ' .- M. ; ' A' 'e !•7 " r• • 4 " 4. 4% • , • " • "s4 G , . fir ' .. 4.:. • r Subject ft - , •..g, • . "a• *P.' If • . - _ r , ,.•5 _, b- • : • • .. '4. .. . sc.. .. —,,,Airi 1 , mili ,1Ze. - •• ••14...... 1......... • • t -e• ' ..... • - . if _ GO" '- .4 ' - ;$ 11.-f• 't,,F.1.4, . ' — . • .11, '' - -'..1. ...pill. ' . - -r i44 ,••• • . . . . ,• " • 7 ! ' '— 4 _ . ,r • _ 4 IC Ag., 4.— CI , ji 4 ' • I Site .. • •. _ .• • ; '..; .. , . L • : __' . , ' c".... ..., ..., •I• • • ' 0.00. 0 A ' dir ,5 i4! 111 t .1,1 ,- -if% . er 1., — - a , 4- - -- 4 . e it ' ! ••• •! ii lb A ,._ g Ilr,--- - • --4 Irmr"...;4 ba -^4 *: ' _ • ,.... a. • , •$!...; :°._ *II .11.• . - 1011% ,::',11 , - - • 7b S b • 'IL ^ . • I' .......-.••• 1 1. . ...I: ' (ri 4..:,e; - " ' -.0 -r In , r ' . c -•".: Lai 144ar-41 .. - . . - di --1. . 1.4.. r 1.L...., I's_ ..- -"'" ..., r, PA ' • , . - .6 Ire : ' , . ; • - • • •ede ,), ....c" - 4 ,_ v . .. .. e • "I4 ' -.---- . . 0 0 r ill : •04, iiisilr te., -- 0 a • *IN lilts. t *rill ; -;•.= ..-ti 6 .SSIctc ' . --- ' , I I.,r, 1 it . J '1. 1! •al - )i illi Ili' . .1:l_"1 . ' .4.- • • - -- ÷ o ..- , ' - 1 - - • . ' ' a' .... . ......,.. .. pr,-,, •• r • 'W' ••• - .. . . t 1. 4 CI i , „. ,i... d - ,,' '. b • . / - • .r• • • r . i - 1 . t '2.3 , I. . 11 . -4 1- -: Ill AeLai:ww•ple.g.,. til NMI I 112111 . .. .7. ....,,,i, . F-4.-Z : ' - := irks girr4 4 7,.- removiato : rt 0 X , • •' ' '')A4 . , vi •.......... .„„..r.- . '. ...., 1 N Source: USGS Year: 1980 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH .i.o& R462 Foothill Boulevard Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 FIGURE 3 Job No: 284253 ffr AEI -iif t ilru# Sightline From Calle Carabe Street APPROXIMATE 200' FROM FOOTHILL ITEM J1: 10/4/17 CITY COUNCIL MEETING: THREE (3) LETTERS RECEIVED REGARDING ITEM October 2, 2017 City Council & Planning Department c/o Tom Grahn, Associate Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Dr. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Rancho Cucamonga City Council and Planning Department: Pomona Valley Audubon Society is the local chapter of National Audubon Society and our territory includes the city of Rancho Cucamonga. Our chapter includes many members who reside in Rancho Cucamonga. The mission of Pomona Valley Audubon Society is to promote the protection, appreciation and enjoyment of birds and other wildlife through recreation, education and conservation of habitat. Our members are disheartened to learn of the loss of riparian habitat and open space that will be caused by the Sycamore Heights project (DRC 16-00206, SUBTT16605M, DRC2012-00672, DRC2016-00207, and DRC2012-00673) in Rancho Cucamonga (RC). In particular we disagree with some of the conclusions of the Initial Study/ Negative Declaration (IS/ND) that downplay the importance of this project site to wildlife species and lack of mitigation to protect sensitive riparian habitat on the site. For the following reasons we believe that further environmental investigation and mitigation, which can addressed in a more comprehensive Environmental Impact Report (EIR), should be required of the developer before the city approves this project. 1) There is a lack of biological data regarding this project site to conclude that wildlife is not going to be significantly impacted by the project. Only two days of wildlife surveys were conducted over a 14 year span. Only 14 native bird species were documented on the project site in the IS/ND which included ten bird species„ three native mammals, and one reptile. No focused studies were conducted on mammal species, like bats, or insect species. The potential for more native species should be determined for this site, especially since a variety of other species have been documented proximal to this site. For example, our members have documented 47 native bird species in Upland Memorial Park, just 0.5 mi east of this project site, and submissions via the eBird website (https://ebird.org/ebird/hotspot/L845141) show at least 30 bird species have been documented just north of this site at the Red Hill Country Club. In fact, just a few days ago, several of our members noted three raptor species, not mentioned in the IS/ND, utilizing the steep slope of the project site where disturbed grassland and some native sage scrub species still exist. As per RC General Plan Policy RC -8.1, more significant mitigation effort should be addressed for the loss of riparian habitat that will occur due to this project. Such significant mitigation could require the developer to contribute to funds to help 1) restore and protect 0 0 riparian habitat in present conservation areas, or 2) acquire proposed conservation areas that would protect riparian habitat, or 3) do both. Present conservation areas include the North Etiwanda Preserve, and proposed conservation areas include those discussed in the Ranch Cucamonga 2010 General Plan (Chapter 6, Fig. RC -4) 2) We are concerned that the remaining 46 trees that qualified as Heritage Trees described in the Tree Removal Permit are not being replaced. We appreciate the protection of the 16-18 trees that are expected to be protected by the Tree Removal Permit, however, we would like any additional native Heritage Trees to be replaced with the same species on the project site. Although these trees may not be considered as healthy as the proposed trees to be preserved, many of them (especially the native oaks sycamores, and elderberries) may still provide important habitat to native wildlife. If there is not enough room to support them on the project site, then perhaps they could be planted in public areas adjacent to the project site such as any adjacent parkways or the Route 66 Trailhead. The larger coast live oaks and California sycamores could be planted further down the slope such as not to obscure the views of the current residents and lookout points for future residents. If further environmental investigation determines that this project is not beneficial to the RC Community, then we suggest that the City of RC consider acquiring the land with the help of non-profit agencies that can help with opening it up as a passive city park. What a treasure this could be! Thank you for considering the further investigation and conservation efforts to protect our native wildlife and habitat. Sincerely, Brian Elliott Conservation Chair Pomona Valley Audubon Society 2058 N. Mills Ave. PMB 426 Claremont, CA 91711 WALTON 874 N. 10th Ave. • Upland, California 91786 • (909)532-2023 • notlaw_17@msn.com August 23, 2017 Planning Department c/o Thomas Grahn, Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Dr. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department: I am a local wildlife biologist who is concerned about the loss of native California vegetative communities and open space in our foothill communities. Below I am providing some comments regarding the Sycamore Heights Project being proposed by the applicant Pacific Summit Foothill LLC. Overall, I am very disappointed to learn that the character of Red Hill will be changed dramatically from a relatively bucolic area to a more urbanized development due to this housing development. I drive by this project location most every day as I frequent Rancho Cucamonga businesses like the Coffee Klatch and I am reminded of the history associated with Route 66 and the Sycamore Inn. Ideally, I would rather see this project site purchased by Rancho Cucamonga and converted to a city park that can be managed to protect the integrity of the >30% slope hillside, as well as the remaining_ native wildlife and vegetation, like desert cottontails (Syvilagus audubonii) and white sage (Salvia apiana), that are rarely found in our sprawling urban environment. However, since the passage of this project seems inevitable, I am glad that the landscape designer is including native plants in the project design ad preserving a few of the native trees. I encourage the landscape designer to use more native plants and trees than non-native plants and trees on the project site. For example, in areas where low -growing trees/large shrubs are desired, I hope that the landscaping includes more native western redbuds (Cercis occidentalis) and Blue elderberries (Sambucus mexicana) than non-native Crape myrtles (Lagerstroema indica). I am also happy to hear that Rancho Cucamonga and the applicant will be considering ways to remove trees in a way to allow bat species, such as the red bat (Lasiurus blossevillit), to safely abandon trees that they are likely using as roosts in the project site's riparian area. I will be providing RC City soon with any information I can find in regards to removing trees in a more ecologically sensitive manner. I am also pleased to see that the City of Rancho Cucamonga is trying to minimize light pollution (Rancho Cucamonga Development Code, Article IV, Section 17.58.050) and, thus, preserve the visual resource of a dark night sky. Please note that some new developments, like the lights on the new bathrooms at the new Route 66 Trailhead Park, are not shielded and, thus, provide undesirable night time glare towards drivers along Foothill Blvd. Therefore, please make sure that all Iights in this new development are properly shielded. In addition to requiring shielded lighting, please ask the applicant to use "warm-white" or filtered LED light bulbs that minimize the glare, or blue -light emission, of such bulbs whenever possible. Please note that LED lights can be so bright that shielding them alone does not minimize the amount of glare they can emit. For more information on minimizing light pollution, please refer to "Lighting Plan Guidelines" (http:l/ibiclub.comldownloaddocs/Lights/DarkSkySocietyGuidelines.pdf) provided by the Dark Sky Society. Thank you for your time and consideration, and please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. Sincerely, ct Natasha Walton, M.S. .v 4,,,-„i- ;;..--,:,i,,,,.),:zi. ti,w(t4.-.. t4a.ti,ii-2.a.-z_v 7.4:67/,---& .--//4_,,... •,2,6:7_.. .._.0 _ kt---a,_) -.! .1e._(__e_.- ..-)i4, 1t-e_f ---11.-Z7- --.../ y4.:0•(---- /2 -244 -1 -t -e___-) --l. 3(j/ -1:1J -if --e '-/' >c=1L-,(')1 -4/..;2.e.:-.)4,i . 2.-1 -ee:-A7' _7...(e" c---42Te__--/-z•- •---1-?-; (:-94-t-i ) i. --:•Z-? z-7_-• . '9:C'":-61. 6;::-/z-LIt • ,- ,,,a,....,,c-J -t _..„...,_. _..-e.;-/L-L; Ai .• / -----.C1t, • 1,l ' -.!..-Z...:2'i 1...., (-t.e..,-2_, (r_:_e"'---)--,•)..2.. --V--,...! .;-:.. . . '-t..it:.-' -- '1- 1:-:-.. ---t _j2 t: )/-, • 1-1/:- /t..i-.1 ie- •/ /;.,. ,, ..----14.-c_ /)c,_ - e: (-;-. IL.. -,, L. . e-.) ze4-,:,..- xl:4/E7-4.%76 z'-h`ei?:... E5 -._,..H. .,..:e. . `/;. c.1. -72 -ti.; -2 -c•f /,Pii•-zi--ii.e;',..1- • .---.2:7-z I e.----ft7- (_,: L -L . c.,_ --Z-7 --." -1--/- -z•-•l ---i -:-'- •( C ---2_,-t:/- , • ,(' z.' --i' 1..,,.. .7.,• . 2-2- f (_„,"' i ( .t/JA/) ,----v. , 1-124-t ,/ %.,:,' ,-/, j.,,./- '-' / --/t.-- -IL Y -2_1...!,,,-.6,.i. (,._) :te; -ir-7- .L -i---1 tidt;-`2-e:- ..' „--,-2.6-;-z-cve„--(--ii /1- C- a -3;; • -L-it,1?... .)( --(-2-6_1- --_/r- .2.//>(L. -/-3-y,js,4,, ,,- • ,c" ----', 4..(,,,,c.t5 ,-.1-dr=h7.4 L..- 'I....-, -.. j . t_ . - • , •,,,,, ,.,-- - - . ./ -•:._ 'CI ' j:---' ` -/ 1-e•C C-' --.E • -"Ca- 4-' 17-‘4,/ t1.1 ---11-i-- - ,f__„,-.,7: . •-• 1-2 (4./ (...t._ ,..._.y‘,-2,-- ,..:3-)-x-i-;41.4L-• / ... --'2" j ,_ fc'' ,; _,, 71,6,_,J 1/ --1-/ c- C-141(•:•/ .--“/ i-'-' . '-h-2422 j. --,c- (i.- -)L.;-ce ,-ic:c:...; ,,-1, 1 z./t::., /-...?_/ ef..,2.) -2-/J-/• :;L:1.1 . , / ci--.`--ii- j _.-(7.....-)-2A/,' ..,:c>ryce;e:- ; .... _,,c3 _;,2.,.t.Z. ‘, _ .0 -) ect --/-",,::e :...c.__J - Y • 6 lz• ---AC__ ' .----\ .1: (1J -'e(7 ). 1..e2 /1-..:'..-C.- ' L/ ,,,,-..;" ,.-2'. ./..(1, ,,-;1-/;.-,- > ,ft3 ---t-.:41i. 'LI /.`", 2 ce- L.: ---t1C-C--:' "' , • Y 2 7i! 7,-,,:.-;,,.....,17.1.,.....„, _...--j;,:-,214: --L.. ''•/JL-1...(c_.i.-.--". i , ._.--7t2 /i_'-•:/---: -.---t - c7i '"•3••?-./e:t(--t 1 /-1 ---/eeie 7,C-7.7 7.-- 7-4_ 7-‘,--4.71.f•C--- 11 /' ---f:t---)z-..../., ;.----A--,-. ' ri.....-._;-.77e. ) r -L • 4-';;:4' 1-1- 41•KI:e.• '•-).. "•1T- •)-'-' 4-; ''''' / 'r----1 --"(' -14- 1-:- i? 41 / /...../ e.' '•I L • _ 7 -1..---t- -11;12 . --a, 12411- 7_,L;://,‘". L.: ,X15.-4:.e,,,i t,,..,..; L e)£:e i.,,e_..7:,7,-) ,----r-e---2:-E-1 . ) L,•• . ., • Mayor !~• Oeo n .S Tllichael C, i4y oP Rancho Cocaolon3a A p bl1c hearin3 for +he Sycamore t-4ei3h* Project" will be on the agenda -Par a C1+y Council meeting in *he near 4'u-fure, my Concerns about this project are �xpres,sed in +he attached totter End newspaper articles, I flan +o appeal +o -I-he Cocnc l -the Pla n n i v73 Coneimiss ion's of Froua I oP sorn.e aspects ©,c +h;6 prdj ect1 i nclocj inj a Variance. Tn addition) r urge -I-he Council -to cen y -the General Plan Amc ncImenf regurrecJ -f-o allow ±hi..s project -}a rocedcj. Please Compel the developer -f-o create 5orv1e+hin9 -I-hat can be boil+ w++hoot amendments or Vary discuss would welcome +he opportunity o ` tlis Pro,J 'ect with you, my ~telephone nUrnber is inclucle,..1 abooe, esol Calle Carabe Rancho CucamonJa►Cn 91730 C cioqi R3/- o 85`s Au3 ust Z`ij 20 17 SinV.ere ly) Henryfigamk, 1~, 'Hank" Stoy R`t1-achments Pacific Summit -Foothill, LLC Invites you to our 3rd community informational meeting for the Sycamore Heights Project (Foothill Blvd @ San Bernardino Rd) tik Pact&Summlt Foothill, LLC Site Plan Illustrative Sywmorc Heights See the development proposal again, learn how the project design responds to community concerns, and ask any remaining questions. Meeting Location Lions East Community Center 9191 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 pittkm•Ami. cw.viu;tkAALL fia-Utik/Auwf 8-z3_i1 ,a7t7fAtk.Re CJA 4441L - Date & Time Thursday, August 17t1' 6:00-7:30 PM es -6g Ca 11e Cara bei Rancho CownlorvaiCli 91'7.30 (qoct j 93i - Nam, n$ 3i Plann,n$ Comm is,4lo n Hugt .st I► Za 17 City of Rancho Coca w)an,3 My r^onoer116' ab0of +be proposed Uzi =pis' , 4� 'me °x Pressed below and in+he attoc.hec ne°cVs{ ler drt'IaF, 9 _ Re uir-ecl +o ,pervni._.LLt.�1�l c euelop�neot o -P .sjr� s in excess O.F 3o"ro Those ��` LAS� IJvI(� U Fil 11 �r � ' P -Prom fhe pr '►'cf have beenessure4 4hat bui Id J 9on •-f-{�ese� 9 hi I 'sr des rs• periled -1y s'a'e 4 However, we ,Were F den fhoii Sante G4gUrances whet? ocr• CCMMufit W,r bw /t t - .Some of +he .dopes Rave wd y wI'+h; Y� J nsfau J l r i&f ked hd i t I ySQr mod �n �' year. And pause. o� �h�: .S-t;� b ► I i z� �Sarn�, rad our units. u r�� � , n� has beer) roc 9 u i red •to �, Uehiale +r`ips eJierat.ee1 hy� +his prc jccs- will exaderba+e. carid Frons probably +he worst inters iidn in +he Cr} - Foothill and PecI r 1 ! (200n+ry Club Drive.. A+ least 3.3 V4 hicy IE5 willi be beLs cj in •the CoIWM0nify and who knows how much trap is +he 1 ium-WorK (J1it create, with only one way in anti out :and ri ht' 'furVls Only, exitin drivers. who wish +o trace j east' have to initially pi-ocee rr west.) execoir a u turn some w Here and head badl< C or cot over Red H;11), ra.5tboun4 drj'vers who vent +0 enter the cleuekoprnen - have +o reverse the proOe.ES, t f� to less people .s0metimcs clamp c r? this property. Rut bui Idir� +45N`�i w li not so1ue the problcm I -t willonl oat these frfdrvlr�ca +0 r lora+e. , xc +he city and cleuc�loper-,are sed -ops about 6lleuia t-inc� I lessnes�, +hey •shoo1cj coordinate With eicodes +h� t- can proui ck fhe shelter and assistance with rYlntai heg�fh and 4.vtaste3nce eil I.5S0S t'ha* these poor lost socajs need, ur,9e you +G Wit' nea�•ive votes on allfrhe E er_ts OP - +his prQj ct you have -Pi-nal iapprova I Qtifhorityy -Pot- e3 nJ MOM +o +he Ci.ty Counci I #hat it reject 1 -he req&ireel General Plv n Amendment. Make file: deuelo pejr� create pr ject +hat can Pe bu i It vi th.ali t Q r/ n ttera..t. c. r .ix9.. a s, -rhali l< you, h -H• ch ni en t ,S'ircerely� k�lr v" �� Na n k .S.y V�AMI�R11t 121116X0S1 RC may get 175 new homes as proposal fllOWS forward .......... Py Uset Marqu•a hnorgue. ttryr vara MORINOCNOAtMa1NGA w A. plat' to build 171i-attue.tted single family tonnes on the vacant slope sin rounding the Sana rtlt)1e Jin Is one step closer to de'veiopnben i , Pacific Summit -Foothill LLC has recounted to build un the a* acres blear t.hti land mark restaurant. Of (he 1.75 units prupo,,:d, nine would be Itve•work e:uudointttituiia, Last weak, lbw Rancho c:u- caunonga Planning Commis. siuu voted 3.0 on the Nous. ins plan known ars Sycamore Heights 1'he eotnrnisaIon has now dent a key component of the request to the City Council for approval whether toaulcnd the general plait 1.0 allow a de- velopment on a slope that Li greater than 30 percent, The developer will have to build arteries of atopens ane re- talnIng wuild. The city Council velli hold a ;public herring on the &me+nd- tnortt, a elty official said, Hut resident Hank Stu). .saki he Is not quite dune with hhi opposition, "Tilt Ilt'velnpet and the lty hod ti esy good arld thorough p,robrntntlonh. shut l still don't really dl{ree w+til thew" h.' said. Stuy 1fyos above, the devote slam in (n tie neigbbarhooa lc /Kiwi' a,• dell TIM and ro LOW c*rned hhout Increased traffic and elle set ray of building on u elope. Stay :mid he I; contatnplut trig tiling an appoal over rho ertifk +tatty, whhh found the new development will create u little over 1,000 trips a day City ufticlais have aunt Ft)othilt aouleVar( has nhc►ut 22 000 trips r1 ()Valid can ear, sly absorb the additional hips The prefect will have rt +b;n• ontmnee -•• with a right turn In and right turn out for safety reasons and 10 pro Whit direct at'.cesa to Merl HIlt Country Club Drive, ofty o,A dela have said. There %tic Just more t:lau half a dozen residents at Wednesday d meeting, and of those, about sIip spoke 13c0.1 bald, "We hate n �•pmnnlnl'y mac( incl rnnfr,re (the l-lty Coun- ell meeting)," hes said "I'll do my best ra rally the troops " No rte or j t fI ti ;W0t0 .j,• +c ly e�,R�r I •t,•'ryM.n ,.•„r • it ,51f mANAN.: Par.lfl� Suminit (oothlll I_i.0 le pvu,Muy'nd to guild Syremore HalQhle,173•-etr.rcheei single family home:, `, e4s011i0, '., Hailes could be built around the Sycamore Inn 1111112/10.111 8y Us** Marquee Irnu/ygy,Qty, yunx. ra,rj aJonrnal.tda( U(, room'. nu►xoxo Cludaixenyti plan to built IV; art single-family homes vacant ahme succour the Sycamore inn will foie the Planning can sign today. Pacific SUnti11it•Pur Lid: has requested to on the 24 arses neat landmark roman rant the project neer,s, tut other things, the vice's proval to Itinettd iia gest plan to allt)W a develops 011 n slope greater thn percent. "WOW worhud her nietko 11.a suitable fit for Ililt," ecoid Jet)* fluoro, It oho Cucamonga's &teono coil f.;oinratutity lyuvul const deputy city mails Clank 9toy, who lives above the. dovelopniettt the neighborhood lout est Red irni, is cupcert about increased traffic a the safety of building of .Ripe.. One of hie biggest lest Is developing on the slot adding he's had to spec thousands of dollars to r Infottte rho hlllsldr by h name. Bloom said there wan be a series of slopes and 1 tattling walls, which will b reviewed by geotechnic engineers, throughout lb development. • On the mouth end cit th project by Foothlli lion lewird, Mourn ►ak1, trier would be it retaining Wal closer to tho bridge ivitl a natural grade entrance The north end of the cleve:l (tprnent would have a series of retaining walls, which would Or reviewed by gap• tc clullcat engineers, agitin.t the housing units to bolo prows ref stabilize the hill- side, he said. The development Would Add a little more than ],tit)o 111p6 tier day, which con- cerns 91.03:"( "(think everyhr,rdy ib .!urt- c'rrnuci about ult..)Inv:1114W Vbhie.ulaz' traffic:. 'Theme t . not ono bit of ntfttgatiun re• auit'ud of the developer by Lite city," he said, "There's A „ only enc way In and unc: rcheri Wary out." on the Roy SA the sirtglo t Whig u ice IS going to fort*itrJv- ito hr t:1' 1.0 (10 Oddtl-turas un mils I:'our hfl boulevard ur b(, ul, through Rod 11111 CountryWilli Club Drive - his neighbor• build hood • • to try co cut through• the traffic, but '1'I►c, reasons cur iht. ,ipJ' tong 0tilriniv -• with it right dire: ap In and l 4111 'tura trut Ay lel Ai litlfnly►tnd 10J�rohibitdirect trent access to Rod Hill I',,inity n ; 0 Club Drive, Bloom aetid, "'1'tiu right-Itiru-c►nly is ,t a to da1'iy me oau re to mike sure Kea it (10e/1111eundict N Ith traffic an. nn Foothill,"1i mid, talc What.run1J►hcatcs 1110 ii;• op- suet is that there, are long gar. term plants to realign heel Just Hill Country Club Delve in Bloom sacci, Rancho Co - Wit rantonxa pilins to uventu,t lit tad realign Fled I1II as wall as nd add a signor Where it mutt, 1 a Foothill Boulevard, ht buil. Installing a 611th►al al the rets entrance of the propused )e, development would be "ton 1d close to the existing signal P- arta too eluae to the Future Is realigned street gnd,slKnal," Aloutn SAW. Id Alberto i spinurp, Rancho Cuctunouga's assistant city e et*Jthtaer, added that Iheu al portion or 'Foothill I1aulct- e yard has about 22,000 U llw a day And cu.ic easily absorb e the additional trips, '1'ht, nttsco1u:c'ptinu is thin e neW tripe per day uu�aue 1 1,000 ItdW Wbicics ill rho 1 area, he said, Ill addition, not 411 thus+ tripe will or.- - our at the: soma tluit+ 141- :wza ira10. 'Trio Plau11iu44 t'tii11gOI,. shin win et41e vthe pltws III- dre,v AU.) then gu t,► rue City C'uandj for tit►al aPltra, �,1, Stay said 11e plaits On :nesting ane -alt one with ctturu•ti tneinbelb before then to vu.ce Fla c.►t►cseroa 'rite Planning Conoids• skin nieetir tic 7 pan. et M500 i,1v1c Center Drive 1u ltaa chu CWe&*mntlkli, S- c 0) CD N N (D CD %G 3. 7 C. O� c 7 0oc<3r+r•t 0_3h 't 74;5r+H.0_ O ''(' c (0 < CD O 0 2 5. 3 S o h a (D a ..4., O 0• ; '-- = 7 CD O 7 (D •..< COi N ` (1,Z r+ Q • (0 ((DD 3 ? 0_ H. C 3 D (Q N 7 S rt Cr 0 h S o �77a, ,ocD? c5a,-30CU 3, 0)*m�asm Q- CD ?-Ir-'.ho-m CD- N 5• (D N 0_ N < M a C` CO n m M W 3 a. (D 7 N h 3 -0, D 0O 3 = 0) `` 0° c*7 * -0 n w O N 0. ° '(D a �• Q. (D 't 3' c O a • 4 T3 "' r N.`< �' chi - C (D `4 (0 -{ m 3 O= % m 7 3 A. m cD (v J ‘< N n=i c0 coZO 0 N'"�•v O r+ o 7 7 ID'r+ O (D 0 C < (0 ?7 (0 7 N* cD N N r+ C S O O D. O O o K. m O 7 ton N Eu N �-I rN+ S c ..0 h 7 c 0 fD c 1, (D (D cn < O (p 7 (p N d * N `< N. 0_ rl. m N cVn (D < o- hCfl -c,.+—) scum E*.m ri S :* *3 m = *o -oDS-o vo a0 -Y) 6.-8 St O" o+ w FIT n hc,h=0 m N 7- r+I 3 NvoO p a Y2. 0. n• (0 T N G.) cN0O�C3 _ O D 0- (Dur7 o D. (n* rc+ O 0_ 7 d 0_= T S o to _+, 7 _0 h r+ NO N O c) K 3 7 S N co :-5.(.0 7 d h0 rr a CIT ,L+_cn ,o��n.h• fD cc. N f f D X 0 ' 3 cap CD S N 7, O � m 7 N =e- 03 (D O (0 N' + 31 '{. 7 -p N 7 h -0 C O 7- (D n " �' a • 0 •�) r+ 7 S O o D • o r+ ? I, (D -o m o `c 3 O c (Dx o-=� (D 0_CU N N 7• c 5.0 11,a `<wna)K03-583°'`)(3-2m(0(0 • (p O 2-c h• c O 8-0-n c) O (0 rt r+ 7 m �D0 7-o(DaN .<ogo(pQ- �• 0_ m _ _. 2 O h0 0) 0a) (0 c o 3 o m'• (DD' 7 (0 m Ell. (p (p (0 Q Ca 0 N• 0) ,Cr '-t (p < O -1 (D 0 ,t m 7 c 3 0- 3 7 7 o< m Er 7- Q O O N (/� N !Li.' cD _ 7 (D (D -, - 0 (D m (D � ▪ ft) cu (� n d o N 0•%:5 ; 'r Fr o 0 ' r* 030-x° F 0 3 o om 0 ` c (D -h r+ O h fD N g (p (30(00 O • 0)) .t N < (D �a r* O S (D 0) N 7 7 0_ 0 7 N5' (0 '+ 0 (D o 0) CD• r+ 0_ C m (D X O (D () 0- 0 (1, CO p) C CD - 7 w 0 CD 7 N 0 •'C- c m 0 0 "G• 7 � m C 3 :p < 0 < (D(0 5.- nr5'7•0- -?3S-o'aNa n h O * - O O c<D OS O • c) r+ < 0 .� o 0 c T (D 7 N O S (D rt•�. o * * fD h 't 7 CD 3" Li O'CD =:r05. �r+ m m 0o cu Cu < CD N CD`z 0_ 0_ (D 3 A. Q O O r+ O(Q O' m v 0 CD 5' IDD cn m ID00_-oIID-0nc) �, < O N (D d -0 d O (D-. D C) CDD h a -• 0 O O, of `Z „I. 0 < S 5• (0 cD W (Oj, -3 (CDD .?vi 0 7 N (0 h Op 3 _ c0 v n. O m a)' o` (° 0 r+ ` (D 3 ='< 7 CD h S S 7 (D 5 r.,. CD_ (D h ' 7 S �' 7- 0 ID 0 0 O c g O OO O < rte +• d O S 0- h cD • n Eu fa) S h C 0_ (n 0? -0 N C u, o) m h cr * 3 m 5. � .- o 7' r+ 2_-§_. g CD (D c) 3 3 fD (� CD 0 • co (n N 0- = CD CD Qo - 3- ,H. C 0 03 7 C 7 r+ (p• n- S O C O G)3,N 3ca3�o (0 < 0 -0 d CD (D C • cu 0 r* o • D@ fD N �a`2 3 Cn V TCD cD c 0 m c,,� o 7 r+ 4- r+' S 0) 7 C 3- c. -0c 0_ 3 * N c =o ma (D -ID cc, 0,-SocID3 (n 0 g, 3X0-03- Q 3 j 0 (D CD 1/4< `G CP W7 3jk) N 0 c0) 7 pre3u icuck az 10140 mak-13 WALTON 874 N. 10th Ave. • Upland, California 91786 • (909)532-2023 • notlaw 17@msn.com October 4, 2017 City Council c/o Thomas Grahn, Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Dr. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Mayor Michael and Council Members: I am a local wildlife biologist who is concerned about the loss of native California vegetative communities and open space in our foothill communities. Below I am adding some information to my original comments discussed in my August 23, 2017, letter regarding the Sycamore Heights Project being proposed by the applicant Pacific Summit Foothill LLC. A more comprehensive Environmental Impact Report should be completed before going forward with this project. Cucamonga has a treasure of native riparian habitat and open space located on this proposed project site that is an oasis to urban sprawl and wildlife. Your biological consultants say that this area is not significant, but that is all relative. In the fragmented habitat of southern California, every possible piece of native habitat can be very significant to the survival of native species, especially animals like birds, bats, and insect pollinators that can fly and use such areas. Please check the following link to an article that discusses how one native tree, like an oak tree, can help increase the entire biodiversity of an urban area. httn://e360.yale.edu/featureslurban nature how to_foster biodiversity in worlds cities The two biological surveys conducted for this project were very limited and more biological surveys, such as bat surveys, should be conducted to get a true idea of the biological diversity of the project site. I am certain that there are many more than the fourteen animal species listed in the two biological surveys conducted on this site. For example, last Friday night September 29`'' after eating dinner at the Sycamore Inn, I detected a bat with my Anabat II bat detector feeding as it flew south from the project site towards the northwest end of the inn's parking lot. Riparian and woodland areas are considered very important conservation areas, especially for bats (Miner and Stokes 2005), so this site should be surveyed for bats before project plans are finalized. Some of the twenty-four bat species found in this region could be utilizing trees and buildings on this site as roosts. Many of these bat species, like the western red bat, are also California Species of Special Concern. I am now in touch with a bat biologist who will be providing me with some methods of how to remove trees while minimizing bat fatalities and I will be passing that information along shortly. These methods, however, will include avoiding the maternity season of bats which occurs in the spring/summer months from the time pups are born and are then able to fly. Thus, having a qualified biologist survey the area for particular species might help determine which months should be avoided. Methods can include leaving felled branches and trunks of trees overnight so that tree -roosting bats can escape from that fallen roost that night. Humane exclusion methods can be used to remove structure -roosting bats from any buildings with roosts in them. General information on the bat species in your area can be found on the Western Bat Working Group website: http://wbwg.org/western-bat-species/ As I had mentioned before, if the project is approved, I encourage the landscape designer to use more native plants and trees than non-native plants and trees on the project site and preserve some of the remnant native sage scrub species and other plants and trees that were documented on the site in the 2003 and 2017 biological evaluations. Species documented on the site include California buckwheat, California sagebrush, California broom, white sage, dove weed, western sunflower, mule fat, fiddleneck, blue elderberry, coast live oaks, and California sycamores. Please also try harder to protect as many of the native heritage trees as possible. In areas where fire is a high concern, please refer to the lists of fire resistant native plants provided by organizations like the California Native Plant Society (http://www.cnps.org/) and Las Pilitas Nursery (http://www.laspilitas.com/easy/deerfire.htm). If the results of an Environmental Impact Report show that this project will be more detrimental than beneficial to our community, then please do consider having the city purchase this land with a plan to make it into a passive park. Non-profit organizations like the Trust for Public Land (https://www.t l.or) should be able to help you with the process and this area would be a wonderful addition to the public space in our foothill community. Thank you for your time and consideration, and please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. Sincerely, Natasha Walton, M.S. Enc. 2 Bats in the South Coast Ecoregion: Status, Conservation Issues, and Research Needs Karen L. Miner2 and Drew C. Stokes3 Abstract California's bat fauna is one of the most diverse in the United States. Of the 25 species of bats in the state, 24 have been detected in the south coast ecoregion. Many of these species appear to have experienced population declines in the ecoregion, and 16 are officially recognized as sensitive (including one endangered) by wildlife regulatory agencies. Data from recent field survey work conducted by bat researchers were compiled in order to provide a tentative assessment of the current status of bats within the south coast ecoregion. These data suggest that the pallid bat (Antrozous pallidus), Townsend's big -eared bat (Corynorhinus townsendii), and California leaf -nosed bat (Macrotus californicus) have experienced population declines and could be seriously threatened, particularly at lower elevations. This may also be true for some of the region's other bat species, such as the western red bat (Lasiurus blossevillii), but additional research is needed. The Yuma myotis (Myotis yumanensis), Mexican free -tailed bat (Tadarida brasiliensis), and big brown bat (Eptesicus fttscus) were frequently encountered in both Krutzsch's (1948) and recent field inventories, so they appear to remain relatively common at this time. The major threat to bats in the ecoregion is the loss of habitat (especially ._3> riparian and oak woodland habitats) due to urban expansion as well as extermination or disturbance of bat colonies. Characterization of species-specific distribution and seasonal habitat use patterns is needed so that land managers can address both foraging and roosting habitat requirements from a landscape perspective. Research is also needed regarding the effects of urbanization, insect control, tree/snag management, bat exclusions, mine closures, and recreational activities, specifically rock -climbing, on bat populations. Key words: bat conservation, Chiroptera, habitat loss, population status, species diversity Introduction California has the fourth highest diversity of bat species in the United States, following Arizona, New Mexico, and Texas, with 25 species representing three families. Twenty-four of these species occur in the south coast ecoregion of the state, indicating the importance of the region to bat diversity. Over two-thirds of the region's bat species are officially recognized as sensitive by the California Department of Fish and Game, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and/or Federal land management agencies at this time (table 1). The California Department of Fish and Game (B. Bolster pers. comm.) reports that four additional species have been proposed to become California Species of Special Concern in the latest draft of "Mammal Species of Special Concern in California" (CSC* in table 1). An abbreviated version of this paper was presented at Planning for Biodiversity: Bringing Research and Management Together, a Symposium for the California South Coast Ecoregion, February 29 -March 2, 2000, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, CA. 2 California Department of Parks and Recreation, Southern Service Center, 8885 Rio San Diego Drive, Suite 270, San Diego, CA 92108 (e-mail: kminer@parks.ca.gov) 3 U.S. Geological Survey, Biological Resource Division, Western Ecological Research Center: San Diego Field Station, 4165 Spruance Road, Suite 200, San Diego, California 92101 (e-mail: dstokes@usgs.gov) USDA Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-195. 2005. 211 Bats in the South Coast Ecoregion—Miner and Stokes Table 1—Bats of California and their legal status. All except Myotis occultus have been previously documented in the south coast ecoregion. Family/ Scientific name' Common name Legal status' Phyllostomatidae Macrotus californicus Choeronycteris mexicana Leptonycteris curasoae yerbabuenae Vespertilionidae Myotis lucifitgus Myotis occultus Myotis yumanensis Myotis velifer Myotis evotis Myotis thysanodes Myotis volans Myotis californicus Myotis ciliolabrurn Lasionycteris noctivagans Pipistrellus hesperus Eptesicus fuscus Lasiurus blossevillii Lasiurus xanthinus Lasiurus cinereus Euderma rrraculatum Cotynorhinus townsendii Antrozous pallidus Molossidae Tadarida brasiliensis Nyctinomops femorosaccus Nyctinomops macrotis Eumops perotis californicus American leaf -nosed bats California leaf -nosed bat Mexican long -tongued bat Lesser long -nosed bat Mouse -eared bats Little brown bat Arizona myotis Yuma myotis Cave myotis Long-eared myotis Fringed myotis Long-legged myotis California myotis Small -footed myotis Silver -haired bat Western pipistrelle Big brown bat Red bat Western yellow bat Hoary bat Spotted bat Townsend's big -eared bat Pallid bat Free -tailed bats Mexican free -tailed bat Pocketed free -tailed bat Big free -tailed bat Western mastiff bat CSC, FSS, BLM CSC FE3 none CSC, BLM FSC, BLM CSC, BLM3 FSC, BLM FSC, CSC*, BLM FSC, CSC*, BLM none FSC, BLM none none none CSC*, FSS CSC* none CSC, FSC, BLM CSC, FSC, FSS, BLM CSC, FSS, BLM none CSC CSC CSC, FSC, BLM Scientific names after Koopman (1993), with the exception of Corynorhinus townsendii (Frost and Timm 1992, Tumlison and Douglas 1992), Lasiurus blossevillii, and L. xanthinus (Baker and others 1988, Morales and Bickham 1995). 2 Legal status categories include Federal Endangered (FE), Federal Species of Concern (FSC), California Species of Special Concern (CSC), Forest Service Sensitive (FSS), and Bureau of Land Management Sensitive (BLM). Source: Calif. Dept. of Fish and Game, Special Animals List of July 2002 and species proposed to become California Species of Special Concern (CSC*, DFG—B. Bolster rrs. comm.) Currently known in the state from only two or three recent public health records from urban areas in the ecoregion (Constantine 1998). Despite the high diversity and sensitivity of bats in the south coast ecoregion, this group of mammals has been largely ignored during environmental review of proposed projects and in recent multi -species planning efforts. This is primarily due to the lack of information on the distribution, seasonal habitat associations, and population status of bat fauna. The purpose of this paper is to bring together recent bat inventories, in order to attempt a preliminary assessment of population status and research needs for this ecologically important group of mammals in the south coast ecoregion of California. 212 USDA Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-195. 2005. T2,42 P490 DATE: October 4, 2017 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Candyce Burnett, City Planner Jennifer Nakamura, Associate Planner STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO ADOPT URGENCY INTERIM ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 919, TO REQUIRE A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR NEW HOTELS IN ALL ZONES FOR A PERIOD OF 45 DAYS RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Urgency Interim Zoning Ordinance No. 919 entitled "An Interim Zoning Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Enacted Pursuant to Government Code Section 65858 Requiring a Conditional Use Permit for the Establishment of New Hotels or the Expansion of Existing Hotels, Declaring the Urgency Thereof and Making A Determination of Exemption Under the California Environmental Quality Act" by four-fifths vote by title only. BACKGROUND: Pursuant to State law, Government Code Section 65858, a city may enact an interim Zoning Ordinance on an urgency basis to protect the public safety, health, and welfare by prohibiting any use(s) that may be in conflict with a contemplated change to a city's General Plan, Specific Plan, zoning requirements, or any such change that a city is intending to study within a reasonable period of time. If approved, the interim ordinance will be effective for a period of 45 days from the date of adoption, unless extended prior to the end of the 45 day period. An urgency ordinance may be extended at a public hearing by a four-fifths vote of the Council. Hotels are facilities with guest rooms or suites, provided with or without kitchen facilities, rented to the general public for transient lodging. Hotels typically include a variety of services in addition to lodging, for example, restaurants, meeting facilities, swimming pools, tennis courts, indoor athletic facilities and personal services. There are currently no regulations in effect regarding the operational standards required for hotels (i.e. security, lighting, staffing and cooperation with law enforcement). ANALYSIS: Hotels can become a convenient location for certain types of criminal activity and have in many instances become associated with criminal activity in many cities throughout Southern California and the United States. The manufacture of methamphetamine and other types of illegal drugs has occurred in Hotels, damaging property and endangering other Hotel guests. Hotels, especially when used for extended stays, are also a convenient destination for prostitution and sex trafficking. Examples of this type of activity from other jurisdictions include: Page 1 of 3 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CONSIDERATION TO ADOPT URGENCY INTERIM ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 919, TO CONDITIONALLY PERMIT EXTENDED STAY HOTELS IN ALL ZONES FOR A PERIOD OF 45 DAYS OCTOBER 4, 2017 1. In 2014, a man was arrested at a hotel in Braintree, MA after threatening an 18 -year old girls because "she wasn't working" as a prostitute. 2. In 2015 the City of Dallas, TX filed suit against the owners of a hotel after more than 40 drug-related arrests, in addition to four prostitution busts and numerous other crimes took place there in preceding years. 3. "Meth labs" have been discovered in hotels in places such as Springfield, MO, Rockdale County, FL, DeKalb County, GA and Lone Tree, CO, among others. In addition, hotels are often used as semi-permanent housing solutions for individuals unable to afford permanent housing, which leads to the creation of unauthorized residential uses on commercial properties in ways that were never intended and often are problematic. Some hotels have been known to actively market their units as an alternative to student housing for college and trade school students, again creating a more permanent type of unauthorized residential use on a commercial property, in a manner which is unsupported and may cause conflict with adjacent uses. There are currently nine hotels within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Most of these hotels have been built in the last 5-9 years; particularly in the last 3 years the City has seen a proliferation of requests for hotels in all categories, including business, extended stay and general categories. The Rancho Cucamonga Police Department has recently noted an increase in calls for service from Hotels within the City. In the last 20 months' there have been over 1200 calls for service at all hotels within the City. While current hotel operators generally work well with the City in a cooperative manner to address these concerns, staff is concerned that without additional tools to regulate the siting and operation of hotels, the current call volume could increase significantly and the City may experience problems similar to what has happened in other jurisdictions. Because of the concerns noted above, Staff believes there is an current and immediate threat to the public health, safety and welfare presented by the establishment of new hotels and the expansion of existing hotels within the City without further regulation of hotel locations and operations. There are currently no regulations in effect regarding the operational standards required for hotels (i.e. security, lighting, staffing and cooperation with law enforcement). If new hotels are established or existing hotel uses are expanded without appropriate review and regulation, it could lead to an increase in drug and prostitution -related crime. New or expanded hotels could also have adverse secondary impacts on neighborhoods and result in significant irreversible change to neighborhood and community character. FISCAL IMPACT: NONE COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Enacting an interim urgency ordinance on hotels furthers the City Council's public safety goals by appropriately regulating and reviewing hotels to prevent criminal activity and create unauthorized residential uses on commercial properties. Page 2 of 3 P491 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CONSIDERATION TO ADOPT URGENCY INTERIM ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 919, TO CONDITIONALLY PERMIT EXTENDED STAY HOTELS IN ALL ZONES FOR A PERIOD OF 45 DAYS OCTOBER 4, 2017 ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 — Urgency Ordinance No. 919 Page 3 of 3 P492 ORDINANCE NO. 919 AN INTERIM ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENACTED PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65858 REQUIRING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF HOTELS OR THE EXPANSION OF EXISTING HOTELS, DECLARING THE URGENCY THEREOF, AND MAKING A DETERMINATION OF EXEMPTION UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT A. Recitals. (i) The City is responsible for adopting and implementing land use regulations within its boundaries. The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code ("Code") generally regulates the entitlement, establishment and operation of Hotels within the City. (ii) Hotels are facilities with guest rooms or suites, provided with or without kitchen facilities, rented to the general public for transient lodging. Hotels typically include a variety of services in addition to lodging, for example, restaurants, meeting facilities, swimming pools, tennis courts, indoor athletic facilities and personal services. (iii) Hotels can become a convenient location for certain types of criminal activity. The manufacture of methamphetamine and other types of illegal drugs has occurred in Hotels, damaging property and endangering other Hotel guests. Hotels are also a convenient destination for prostitution and sex trafficking. (iv) Evidence from jurisdictions throughout the country demonstrates that Hotels often attract or are the source of criminal activity: 1. In 2014, a man was arrested at a Hotel in Braintree, MA after threatening an 18 -year old girl because "she wasn't working" as a prostitute; 2. In 2015, the City of Dallas, TX filed suit against the owners of a Hotel after more than 40 drug-related arrests, in addition to four prostitution busts and numerous other crimes took place there in the preceding years; 3. In 2014, three people were arrested for conspiracy and loitering with intent to commit prostitution outside of a Hotel in National City, CA; 4. "Meth Tabs" have been discovered in Hotels in places such as Springfield, MO, Rockdale County, FL, DeKalb County, GA, and Lone Tree, CO, among others. (v) The City has recently experienced an increase in calls for service from Hotels within the City. There are currently nine Hotels in the City that have generated a total of 1,214 calls for service in the last 20 months. (vi) Hotels are often used as semi-permanent housing solutions for individuals unable to afford permanent housing, which leads to the creation of unauthorized residential uses on commercial properties. Some Hotels have been known to actively market their units as an alternative to student housing for college and trade school students. Ordnance No. 919 — Page 1 of 4 Attachment 1 P493 P494 (vii) The proliferation of new Hotels throughout the City without due consideration through the approval of a conditional use permit presents an immediate threat to public health, safety or welfare. If new Hotels are established, or existing uses are expanded without appropriate review and regulation, it could lead to an increase in drug and prostitution -related crime. New or expanded Hotels could also have potential adverse secondary effects on neighborhoods and result in significant irreversible change to neighborhood and community character. (viii) There are currently no regulations in effect pertaining to security, traffic, safety or other impacts at Hotels or the services that these Hotels offer to guests, nor has the City undertaken a comprehensive analysis of the suitability of Hotels within the City's various zoning districts. (ix) The City intends to study the issues associated with Hotels in order to determine which locations are most appropriate for them, and what requirements, if any, should be imposed on their operation. After undertaking this study, the City intends to enact permanent regulations specific to Hotels. The City intends to undertake the required study within a reasonable time. In the interim, the City Council finds it necessary to enact a conditional use permit requirement for Hotels to prevent the establishment or expansion of Hotels that may conflict with the contemplated new policies or regulations or otherwise present impacts that would go unaddressed absent a conditional use permit process. (x) Absent the passage of this Interim Ordinance, continued approval of entitlements for Hotels without approval of conditional use permits poses a current and immediate threat to the public health, safety or general welfare. If this Interim Ordinance does not become effective immediately, but instead becomes effective thirty (30) days after a second reading, there is a risk that further harm will be done to prevent the orderly development of Hotels in the City. There is therefore an urgent necessity for the City to adopt a conditional use permit requirement for the establishment and expansion of Hotels to take effect immediately. This requirement is intended to provide the City with an opportunity to evaluate and modify its zoning provisions in order to promote the appropriate development of Hotels in the City. (xi) Due to the foregoing circumstances, the City Council finds and determines that the immediate preservation of the public health, safety, and welfare requires that this Interim Ordinance be enacted pursuant to Government Code sections 36934, 36937 and 65858, and that it take effect immediately upon adoption, and its urgency is hereby declared. B. Ordinance NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council hereby ordains as follows: Section 1. Legislative Findings. The City Council finds that the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct and, based on such facts and the entirety of the record before it, further finds as follows: a. The establishment and operation of any new Hotels or the expansion of any existing Hotel within the City without due consideration through the approval of a conditional use permit and before the City has a chance to study current impacts and potential regulation would result in adverse impacts, constitute a nuisance, and present a risk to the public health, safety, and welfare. Ordnance No. 919 — Page 2 of 4 P495 b. Requiring a conditional use permit for new or expanded Hotels in any zone or overlay in which Hotels are permitted is necessary to protect the public safety, health, and welfare. Section 2. Conditional Use Permit Requirement Established. The City Council hereby establishes an interim zoning ordinance imposing a conditional use permit requirement on new Hotels and expansions of existing Hotels in all zones of the City where Hotels are permitted. During the term of this Interim Ordinance, no Hotel shall be allowed, nor shall any entitlement or permit be issued for a Hotel, unless a conditional use permit is approved for the proposed use in accordance with the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code. For purposes of this Interim Ordinance, the term "Hotel" shall mean a hotel, motel, or inn containing ten or more sleeping rooms, which is used for temporary occupancy of transients. The "establishment" of a Hotel includes both the development and operation of an entirely new structure for a Hotel, and the conversion of an existing apartment building, or other structure into a Hotel. The "expansion" of a Hotel includes any increase in the hours of operation, size of the building, or any other increase in the intensity of use of the Hotel. Section 3. Ordinance is Supplemental. This Interim Ordinance is additional to and supplemental to, and shall not affect, except as specifically provided herein, any provision of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code, which shall be operative and remain in full force and effect without limitation. Section 4. Term. This Interim Ordinance shall take effect on October 4, 2017, and shall remain in effect for a period of 45 days from the date of publication in accordance with California Government Code Section 65858, and shall expire, and the prohibition established hereby shall terminate, forty-five (45) days after the date of adoption unless extended by the City Council pursuant to California Government Code Section 65858. Section 5. Immediate Effect. This Interim Ordinance is an urgency ordinance for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, and safety within the meaning of Government Code sections 36934, 36937 and 65858, and therefore shall be passed immediately upon its introduction and shall become effective immediately upon its adoption, by a minimum four-fifths (4/5) vote of the City Council. Section 6. CEQA. The City Council hereby finds that it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the adoption of this Ordinance, and the zoning provisions established hereby, may have a significant effect on the environment, because the Ordinance will impose greater limitations on development in the City, and will thereby serve to eliminate potentially significant adverse environmental impacts. It is therefore not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act review pursuant to Title 14, Chapter 3, Section 15061(b)(3) of the California Code of Regulations. Section 7. Penalty. Violation of any provision of this Ordinance shall constitute a misdemeanor and shall be punishable by a fine not to exceed one thousand dollars ($1,000) or by imprisonment for a period not to exceed six (6) months, or by both such fine and imprisonment. Each and every day such a violation exists shall constitute a separate and distinct violation of this Ordinance. Section 8. Civil Remedies. The violation of any of the provisions of this Ordinance hereby adopted shall constitute a nuisance and may be abated by the City through civil process by means of restraining order, preliminary or permanent injunction, or in any other manner provided by law for the abatement of such nuisances. Ordnance No. 919 — Page 3 of 4 P496 Section 9. Severability. The City Council declares that, should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence, or word of this Ordinance be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences and words of this Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. Section 10. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. ATTEST: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was passed by a 4/5 vote at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 4th day of October, 2017, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEMBERS: Ordnance No. 919 — Page 4 of 4 Urgency Interim Zoning Ordinance - Hotels October 4, 2017 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA San Ber•^•^e^.c Hotels in Rancho Cucamonga Almond 51 Q The Farm Cottage Hillside Rd Y m m WtiSon Ave f G a a w> b r2i Banyan St m g - y Lem on „g„ Le'+7o q Aven ro zta 1FoothillFwy E �wt+Sf 14th St m o 3 g E 16th St P1. Line Rd ALTA LOMA H1I Is!tie Rd Foothill Fwy Church St ti E Fopr Historic Rte 60 Rancho 1 M/iafvd ro A> ;� Arrow Route E 4th SI Z Hermosa Ave Cucamonga Wilson Ave Q Chaffey College vnyanSt Lere r AJc 210 M19M Base Line Rd any uaM I I W �M1t�s4ea Vi ctnna Park Ln ra m n .� %Aste Pk1 ,12 m 7 Historic 06 Y Creek Blvd Ghurch Sr 0 Viceria Gards Lg ElectronicsVP ()Clones Marijuana Plants Arrow Route Arrow Route - California Cannabis... Bth St E 8th St Sth St E 6th St w E 4th St Ourth-St 6th SI 0 Jersey BI d a Aireloom Bedding Co G7 7th St Ph 5t a Banyan St Ban yan' a m Base Line Rd E Foothill Blvd Arrow ute hlapa S^t Q Nongshim America, Inc. 0 0517 Garden Inn rioiRancho 0 S Nighlanc Walnut Si Baseline Ave x 0. E Lir Historic Rte 66 Operating Hotel Under Construction rep ti®r 1 2 Approved, not built San Bernardino Ave CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Hotels in Rancho Cucamonga • Hotels in Rancho Cucamonga are safe, clean and well maintained • Well suited for business travel, weekend and vacation stays • Employ hundreds of employees and contribute millions to our local economy • Police and Fire partner with hotel managers to ensure guests have a safe and enjoyable stay CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Current concerns • Hotels are permitted in many zones within the City • The current permitted zones have different requirements • Increased segmentation in the hotel business • Long-term stay hotels • Suite hotels • Other cities that have had significant growth in hotel development have seen negative community impacts CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Why an interim ordinance • Increased interest in hotel development within the City • Ensure long term property maintenance • Be more responsive to increased market segmentation CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Goals for a Permanent Ordinance • Ensure proper siting of new hotels within the City • Develop standard operating requirements to ensure consistent operation over the long term • Avoid negative community impacts by developing appropriate land use controls • Prevent the development of hotels from negatively impacting City operations CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Recommendation • Approve Urgency Ordinance No. 919 • Valid for 45 days • Expire on November 18, unless extended by Council after a public hearing CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P497 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: October 4, 2017 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Candyce Burnett, City Planner Tom Grahn, Associate Planner STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: STATUS UPDATE REGARDING PREPARATION OF THE NORTH EASTERN SPHERE ANNEXATION PROJECT INCLUDING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2015-00749, ZONING MAP AMENDMENT DRC2015-00752, NORTH EASTERN SPHERE ANNEXATION SPECIFIC PLAN DRC2015-00751, ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2015-00750, NORTH EASTERN SPHERE ANNEXATION DRC2015-00732, AND RELATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council: 1. Receive staff's report and presentation; and 2. Discuss and provide comments regarding the NESAP. BACKGROUND: In mid -2015, the City contracted with Sargent Town Planning (STP) and their consultant team for the approximate 4,115 -acre North Eastern Sphere Annexation Project (NESAP). The project area extends from Haven Avenue, easterly to the City's boundary with Fontana, and from the northerly City limits to the National Forest boundary. The entirety of the project will include a General Plan Amendment, Zoning Map Amendment, North Eastern Sphere Annexation Specific Plan, Etiwanda North Specific Plan Amendment, the North Eastern Sphere Annexation, and all related environmental documentation. The initial concept plan for the project area was presented at both City Council and Planning Commission workshops, and to the NESAP Technical Advisory Committee. Initial design considerations maintain the northerly 2,915 acres as a "conservation priority area", and 1,200 acres of "development priority area" in the southerly portion generally located between Milliken Avenue and Day Creek Avenue, north of Banyan Street. Early concepts for the development priority area include a mix of residential product types, a central commercial "town center" with neighborhood retail and restaurants, and public uses and amenities arranged in a compact and walkable land use pattern to encourage active living. Over the past 18 months, City staff, STP, and the San Bernardino County Flood Control District (SBCFCD) have had several meetings with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) to discuss the proposed project and elicit CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT NORTH EASTERN SPHERE ANNEXATION PROJECT STATUS UPDATE October 4, 2017 Page 2 comments regarding potential environmental constraints. Because of their comments, the project area was evaluated for the presence of the San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat (SBKR) and trappings were conducted; no presence of the SBKR was found on-site. Additionally, the project area was evaluated for the presence and quality of Riversidean Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub (RAFFSS), which determined that due to the lack of sand and water flows across the site the RAFFSS habitat is declining and will continue to degrade. In response, STP and the SBCFCD are considering a restoration plan to restore water flows and sand to the project site, which may help improve RAFFSS habitat within the project area. STP continues to address biological resource assessments related to development of the NESAP Environmental Impact Report and the development of the North Eastern Sphere Annexation Specific Plan. In July 2017, the City Council approved an amendment to the scope of work and budget for STP to address additional environmental issues and engineering work related to the development of a project Tentative Tract Map. NEXT STEPS: The Notice of Preparation (NOP) for the NESAP was circulated to public agencies that have discretionary approval power over the project, i.e. "Responsible Agencies" and Native American Governments, and made available for review at the Archibald and Biane Libraries and on the City's website on September 11, 2017. As Staff is in the process of preparing a revised NOP to include more comprehensive information about the project and distributed to additional public agencies, the comment period will end in late October 2017 (which exceeds the minimum 30 -day requirement). On September 27, 2017, the Planning Commission held a public scoping meeting on the NOP to elicit comments identifying the issues that should be studied in the Environmental Impact Report (EIR). The commissioners agreed with the comprehensive list of environmental topics to be addressed in the EIR. They also supported Staffs planned efforts for obtaining public input on the project. This will include community meetings with property owners and residents within the vicinity of the project area. Due to the size and scope of the project area, there will be multiple meetings and, as necessary, the notification radius for the mailed invitations to these meetings will be increased beyond the 660 feet that required by the Development Code. There also will be presentations conducted by the City and the consultants to discuss the project with stakeholder groups such as CVWD, the local school districts, and neighborhood homeowner associations. Social media and the City's website will be used extensively for providing information to the public as well. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 - NESAP Location Map CB:TG/Is P498 0u 0] z W p499 Attachment 1 NORTH EASTERN SPHERE ANNEXATION SPECIFIC PLAN CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA :II SARGENT -4•• TOWN PLANNING Emsra i rri i+ associates Lisa wise consulting, inc. ]TirIAM c NORTH EASTERN SPHERE ANNEXATION SPECIFIC PLAN FEHRtPEERS Improving Communifiei Since i 98S DUDEK Michael Baker INTERNATIONAL Egli SARGENT ■•■ TOWN PLANNING City Council Update AGENDA ■ Summary of plan objectives. ■ Overview of the last year's work. ■ Overview of Plan progression. ■ Summary of current vision plan. ■ Questions and input from the City Council Public Comment )TAMONCA NORTH EASTERN SPHERE ANNEXATION SPECIFIC PLAN Egli SARGENT ...TOWN PLANNING NORTH EASTERN SPHERE ANNEXATION PROJECT PLAN OBJECTIVES 1. Permanent Conservation Permanent urban edge, preserving and restoring the sensitive natural habitats, resources, landscapes and views. Fiscal Sustainability Avoid "patchwork" of fiscally unsustainable neighborhood fragments, prone to natural hazards (wildfires, landslides.) A Center for North Rancho Cucamonga A walkable, bikeable destination with commercial amenities for surrounding neighborhoods, overlooking new preserve, trailhead to Foothills and civic amenities for the whole community. 4. Interconnected Walkable Neighborhoods Spectrum of housing options, from large lot view homes to smaller homes, attached homes, condos and apartments targeted to a broad range of household sizes and types. )TAM RANCHO NORTH EASTERN SPHERE ANNEXATION SPECIFIC PLAN I. j SARGENT ■.■ TOWN PLANNING RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN KEY OBJECTIVES RELATED TO THIS PLAN ■ Inspire a community culture and lifestyle that embraces health and sustainability ■ Develop a balanced, integrated, multi -modal transportation system ■ Protect the character and high quality of established residential neighborhoods. ■ Offer missing housing/lifestyle options in new sustainable neighborhoods. ■ Diversify the employment base and fiscal sustainability ■ Preserve access to and frame views of the mountains, open spaces and habitat Provide high quality community parks and facilities for all ages and interests )TAMONCA NORTH EASTERN SPHERE ANNEXATION SPECIFIC PLAN Egli SARGENT ■•■ TOWN PLANNING CHRONOLOGY FALL 2015 TO FALL 2017 ■ Aug to Oct 2015: Prepared initial conceptual plan based on site analysis and City direction, presented to Commission and Council regulatory agencies. ■ Nov 2015 to Mar 2016: In response to regulatory agency input prepared conceptual hydrology study, conducted small mammal trapping, and worked with County Flood Control on updated plan focused on habitat restoration. ■ Apr to Oct 2016: Met again with regulatory agencies, conducted more detailed hydrology analysis and more detailed bio mapping of Conservation Priority Area. ■ Oct 2016 to May 2017: Met again with regulatory agencies. In response prepared further revised /final plan alternative with substantially larger restoration area in Development Priority Area. May 2017 to Present: Prepared amended contract and schedule to complete Specific Plan and EIR by spring 2017. )TAMONCA NORTH EASTERN SPHERE ANNEXATION SPECIFIC PLAN I. j SARGENT ■.■ TOWN PLANNING LOWER ALLUVIAL FAN OPEN SPACE RESOURCES LOWER QUALITY, DISCONNECTED, FLOOD PROTECTED, NO SBKR 210 -.0/1 ._pnairVainlot eartI CAMuCAM(NVNuA NORTH EASTERN SPHERE ANNEXATION SPECIFIC PLAN Egli SARGENT ...TOWN PLANNING CONSERVATION OF FOOTHILL ENVIRONMENTS OVERALL GOAL Conserve a connected system of biologically viable habitat lands to reclaim natural processes and protect sensitive species. - Develop a preserve system that will enhance, protect and maintain ecosystem functions and values. • Provide a consistent regulatory process that allows for efficient permitting of residential and commercial development in appropriate locations. Maintain scenic beauty, natural biological diversity, and compatible recreational opportunities to enhance the local quality of life. )TAMONCA NORTH EASTERN SPHERE ANNEXATION SPECIFIC PLAN I. j SARGENT ■.■ TOWN PLANNING PLAN PROGRESSION DEVELOPMENT PRIORITY AREA —1,212 AC Development Priority Area Original Neighborhood Plan — Oct 2015 ■ Increased Conservation Plan — May 2016 )TAMONCA NORTH EASTERN SPHERE ANNEXATION SPECIFIC PLAN nrylirco, L..__. Egli SARGENT ...TOWN PLANNING NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN DEVELOPMENT PRIORITY AREA —1,212 AC Based on series of meetings with regulatory agencies and extensive biological mapping and small mammal trapping ■ Existing rock levees provide pre -constructed wildfire protection for town center edges ■ West Neighborhood in primarily chaparral vegetation type )TAMONCA NORTH EASTERN SPHERE ANNEXATION SPECIFIC PLAN Egli SARGENT ■•■ TOWN PLANNING DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL MAXIMUM BEING ANALYZED ■ Neighborhood Development Area Potential Open Space/Conservation±490 acres Utility Easement ±143 acres Developable Area ±579 acres Total Site Area ±1,212acres ■ Dwelling Unit Total: 3,800 ■ DUA Average (Net) 6.57 DUA Average (Gross) 3.14 * All totals subject to approved zoning and entitlement/ mitigation plans and agreements )irlAMONCA NORTH EASTERN SPHERE ANNEXATION SPECIFIC PLAN 7.1 - TOWN CENTER NEIGMBOHOOD 1228.3 acres) IN SARGENT ■E■ TOWN PLANNING THE PUBLIC REALM WALKABLE NEIGHBORHOOD STRUCTURE • Streets orient and connect to open spaces framing views of nature and mountains • Neighborhoods with 5 -minute walking distance from center to edge. Pedestrian -scale blocks, interconnected street network, off-street trails • Every household within a comfortable, safe 2 - minute walk of a small park or playground Safe comfortable longer walk or bike ride to school and neighborhood shops. Every home within a 5 minute walk of a walking/bike riding trail. )TAMONCA NORTH EASTERN SPHERE ANNEXATION SPECIFIC PLAN i • L-_ -i �•, •1 !r • I ` �► 1 1, ; i; •' • 7,. ..NSARGENT ■.■ TOWN PLANNING THE PUBLIC REALM COMPLETE STREETS CRANCHO KAMNVNuA NORTH EASTERN SPHERE ANNEXATION SPECIFIC PLAN Egli SARGENT ...TOWN PLANNING THE PUBLIC REALM PARKS WITH UNIQUE AMENITIES RANCHO )-McA NORTH EASTERN SPHERE ANNEXATION SPECIFIC PLAN ... SARGENT ...TOWN PLANNING TRAIL NETWORK IN UTILITY CORRIDORS, ALONG EDGE DRIVES, INTO FOOTHILLS TO THE NORTH )TAM RANCHO NORTH EASTERN SPHERE ANNEXATION SPECIFIC PLAN Egli SARGENT ...TOWN PLANNING THE PUBLIC REALM TRAILHEAD AND SUPPORT FACILITIES IN VILLAGE CENTER )i'AA1 c NORTH EASTERN SPHERE ANNEXATION SPECIFIC PLAN Egli SARGENT ...TOWN PLANNING THE PUBLIC REALM LANDSCAPE CALIBRATED TO CLIMATE AND LOCAL HABITAT )TAM RANCHO NORTH EASTERN SPHERE ANNEXATION SPECIFIC PLAN Egli SARGENT ...TOWN PLANNING THE PUBLIC REALM INDOOR/OUTDOOR DINING AND ENTERTAINMENT )TAM RANCHO NORTH EASTERN SPHERE ANNEXATION SPECIFIC PLAN Egli SARGENT ...TOWN PLANNING WILSON VILLAGE CENTER MIXED-USE CENTER FOR FOOTHILL COMMUNITY r CONSOI .7 CAMlrAM(NVNu NORTH EASTERN SPHERE ANNEXATION SPECIFIC PLAN Egli SARGENT ...TOWN PLANNING WILSON VILLAGE CENTER MIXED-USE BUILDINGS WITH WELCOMING FRONTAGES j;0 ii 'I. ''+' 'IP III 1 i 1 111!111 I III )TAM RANCHO NORTH EASTERN SPHERE ANNEXATION SPECIFIC PLAN Egli SARGENT ...TOWN PLANNING WILSON VILLAGE CENTER PEDESTRIAN -ORIENTED FRONTAGES RANCHO )-McA NORTH EASTERN SPHERE ANNEXATION SPECIFIC PLAN Egli SARGENT ...TOWN PLANNING WILSON NEIGHBORHOOD ADJACENT TO WILSON CENTER Gateways to town center, 2-3 story buildings Houses, rowhouses, live work, condos, apartments ■ Range of 10 to 36 dua in highly walkable, amenity - rich environment )TAM RANCHO NORTH EASTERN SPHERE ANNEXATION SPECIFIC PLAN Egli SARGENT ...TOWN PLANNING WILSON NEIGHBORHOOD MIX OF SINGLE -AND MULTI-FAMILYTYPES )TAM RANCHO NORTH EASTERN SPHERE ANNEXATION SPECIFIC PLAN Egli SARGENT ...TOWN PLANNING GENERAL NEIGHBORHOOD RESIDENTIAL ONLY • Single family detached and attached types. Some alley -loaded some not Edges are designed as transitions to adjacent neighborhoods and natural habitat. )i'AA1 c NORTH EASTERN SPHERE ANNEXATION SPECIFIC PLAN Egli SARGENT ...TOWN PLANNING GENERAL NEIGHBORHOOD PEDESTRIAN -ORIENTED FRONTAGES )TAM RANCHO NORTH EASTERN SPHERE ANNEXATION SPECIFIC PLAN Egli SARGENT ...TOWN PLANNING GENERAL NEIGHBORHOOD SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED HOMES )TAM RANCHO NORTH EASTERN SPHERE ANNEXATION SPECIFIC PLAN Egli SARGENT ...TOWN PLANNING HEIGHTS NEIGHBORHOOD LARGER LOTVIEW HOMES Range from 1 to 3 dua ▪ Houses on lots 80+ feet wide • Large -lot single-family houses ▪ Neighborhood parks and greens; HOA -maintained amenities RANCI40 )-IGY NORTH EASTERN SPHERE ANNEXATION SPECIFIC PLAN Egli SARGENT ...TOWN PLANNING HEIGHTS NEIGHBORHOOD INCLUDING CUSTOM/SEMI-CUSTOM HOMES )i'AA1 c NORTH EASTERN SPHERE ANNEXATION SPECIFIC PLAN Egli SARGENT ...TOWN PLANNING HEIGHTS NEIGHBORHOOD RURAL STREET DETAILING - HILLSBOROUGH )i'AA1 c NORTH EASTERN SPHERE ANNEXATION SPECIFIC PLAN Egli SARGENT ...TOWN PLANNING