HomeMy WebLinkAbout2000/07/05 - Agenda PacketCITY ,OF
RANCHO:' CUCAMONGA
10500 Civic ¢~nt'er Drive
Rancho Cucamo,'nga;:'OA 91730
7
City Office: (909) 477-2 00
.- CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
REGULAR MEETINGS:
1ST and 3rd Wednesdays, 7:00 p.m.
July 5, 2000
Agency, Board & City Council Members
William J. Alexander ....................Mayor
Diane Williams ...............Mayor Pro Tem
Paul Biane ...............................Member
James V. Curatalo .....................Member
Bob Dutton ..............................Member
Jack Lam .........................City Manager
James L. Markman .............City Attorney
Debra J. Adams .....................City Clerk
ORDER OF BUSINESS
5:30 p.m.
7:00 p.m.
Closed Session .................................Tapia Conference Room
Regular City Council i~3eeting ......................Council Chambers
City Council Agenda
July 5, 2000
All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing.
The deadline for submitting these items is 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, one
week prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's Office receives all such
items.
A. CALL TO ORDER
1. Pledge of Allegiance.
2. Roll Call: Alexander Biane __
Curatalo Dutton , and
Williams
B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS
C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
This is the time and place for the general public to address the City
Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any
issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may
receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting.
Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual.
D. CONSENT CALENDAR
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and
non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time
without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember
or member of the audience for discussion.
1. Approval of Minutes: June 7, 2000
June 12, 2000
Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 6/14/00 and 6/21/00 and Payroll
ending 6/22/00 for the total amount of $8,012,340.28.
Approval of Resolution to adopt a Memorandum of Understanding (CO
00-048, 00-049and 00-050) for all City employee groups.
RESOLUTION NO. 00-130
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ENTRY INTO
MEMORANDA OF UNDERSTANDING WITH
THE CITY'S GENERAL EMPLOYEE,
MAINTENANCE EMPLOYEE, AND THE
SUPERVISORY/PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYEE
MEET AND CONFER GROUPS FOR FISCAL
YEARS 2000/2001,2001/2002 AND 2002/2003
1
12
13
City Council Agenda
July 5, 2000
Approval to adopt a Resolution rescinding Resolution No. 99-169 and
implementing Salary and Benefits for Fiscal Year 2000/2001.
RESOLUTION NO. 00-131
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, RESCINDING RESOLUTION
NO. 99-169 AND IMPLEMENTING SALARY
AND BENEFITS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2000/01
Approval to transfer a City vehicle to the County of San Bernardino for
Police services.
Approval of Light Fee Waiver Amendment proposed by Park and
Recreation Commission for youth sports recreation organizations who
currently are ineligible for existing light fee waiver.
Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and
Ordering the Annexation of Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 and
Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 4 for Tract 16000,
located in Terra Vista Planned Communities and bounded by Church
Street, Elm Avenue (west) and Spruce Avenue, submitted by LDC
Cougar LLC and Western Land Properties LP.
RESOLUTION NO. 00-132
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP
NUMBER 16000, IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT
SECURITY
RESOLUTION NO. 00-133
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION
OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 AND
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NOS. 1 AND 4 FOR TRACT 16000
Approval to accept the bids received, appropriate $176,417.40 from the
fund balance of Fund 22 (Transportation) to be placed in Account No.
22-4637-9935, award and authorize the execution of the Contract for
the Construction of Banyan Street at Fredericksburg Avenue Traffic
Signal and Widening Improvements in the amount of $171,417.40
($155,834.00 plus 10% contingency) to Gentry Brothers, Inc. (CO 00-
051), the apparent low bidder, to be funded from Transportation Fund
Account No. 22-4637-9935.
17
18
29
30
32
34
35
41
City Council Agenda
July 57 2000
9. Approval to appropriate funds and award and authorize the execution of
the Contract in the amount of $159,400 ($144,842 plus 10%
contingency) for the Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting at Carnelian
Street and La Vine/La Grande Streets, to the apparent low bidder, L.A.
Signal (CO 00-052), to be funded from Transportation Fund Account
22-4637-9921.
10. Approval to acknowledge a Consent Agreement between William Lyon
Homes, Inc., and Southern California Edison (CO 00-053) regarding
improvements to Victoria Park Lane Crossing Edison Rights-of-Way
adjacent to Tract 15871, submitted by Southern California Edison.
RESOLUTION NO. 00-134
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ACKNOWLEDGING THE
CONDITIONS OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN
WILLIAM LYON HOMES, INC., AND
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
REGARDING INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN VICTORIA PARK
LANE ACROSS THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
EDISON RIGHT-OF-WAY WHICH WILL
BECOME THE CITY'S RESPONSIBILITY
11. Approval to accept the Installation of Park and Walkway Lighting in
Church Street Park, release bonds, authorize the City Engineer to file a
Notice of Completion and approve final contract amount of $72,700.00.
RESOLUTION NO. 00-135
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE
INSTALLATION OF PARK AND WALKWAY
LIGHTING IN CHURCH STREET PARK AS
COMPLETE, AND AUTHORIZE THE FILING
OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE
WORK
44
46
48
53
54
City Council Agenda
July 5, 2000
E. CONSENT ORDINANCES
The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first
reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non-
controversial. The Council will act them upon at one time without
discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be
removed for discussion.
CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 00-01 B -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOC.
Request to change the General Plan land use designation from Medium
Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to Low-Medium Residential
(4-8 dwelling units per acre) for 22.9 acres of land located on the nodh
side of Base Line Rd. approximately 765 feet west of the intersection
with Victoria Park Lane -APN: 227-881-01. A Negative Declaration of
Environmental Impacts has been prepared for consideration.
CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND
VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 00-01 - CHARLES
JOSEPH ASSOC. - Request to change Victoria Community Plan
zoning designation from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per
acre) to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for 22.9
acres of land located on the north side of Base Line Road,
approximately 765 feet west of the intersection with Victoria Park Lane
- APN: 227-881-01. A Negative Declaration of Environmental
Impacts has been prepared for consideration.
ORDINANCE NO. 623 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHQ CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING VICTORIA
COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 00-01,
CHANGING THE LAND USE DESIGNATION
FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14
DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW-
MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING
UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 22.9 ACRES OF
LAND LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF
BASE LINE ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 765
FEET WEST OF THE INTERSECTION WITH
VICTORIA PARK LANE, AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN:
227-881-01
55
City Council Agenda
July 5, 2000
CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 00-01A - NORTHTOWN HOUSING
DEVELOPMENT CORP. - A request to change the General Plan land
use designation from Commercial and Medium-High Residential (14-24
dwelling units per acre) to Mixed Use for 3.24 acres of land located on
the east side of Amethyst Avenue, south of the intersection with La
Grande Street and nodh of the intersection with Lomita Drive. The City
will also consider Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per
acre) and Office as alternatives for the entire site - APN: 202-151-12.
Related files: Development Code Amendment 00-01, and Development
Agreement 00-01.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
AMENDMENT 00-01 - NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT
CORP. - A request to change the Development District zoning
designation from General Commercial and Medium-High Residential
(14-24 dwelling units per acre) to Mixed Use, and the establishment of
a Senior Housing Overlay District (SHOD), including deviation from
certain development standards for the residential portion of the base
district, on 3.24 acres of land located on the east side of Amethyst
Street, south of the intersection with La Grande Street and north of the
intersection with Lomita Drive. The City will also consider Medium-High
Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) and Office as alternatives for
the entire site - APN: 202-151-12. Related files: Development Code
Amendment 00-01, General Plan Amendment 00-01A, and
Development Agreement 00-01. A Negative Declaration of
Environmental impacts has been prepared for consideration.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT 00-01 - NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT
CORP. - A Development Agreement between the City of Rancho
Cucamonga and the Northtown Housing Development Corp. for the
purpose of providing a Senior Housing Project per the requirements of
the Senior Housing Overlay District (Section 27.020.040 of the
Development Code), including deviation from certain development
standards for 80-96 senior apartment units and one manager unit on a
Mixed Use site of 3.24 acres of land located on the east side of
Amethyst Avenue, south of the intersection with La Grande Street and
north of the intersection with Lomita Drive - APN: 202-151-12.
Related files: Development Code Amendment 00-01, General Plan
Amendment 00-01A. and Development District Amendment 00-01.
City Council Agenda
July 5, 2000
ORDINANCE NO. 624 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT
DISTRICT AMENDMENT 00-01, A REQUEST
TO AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS
MAP AND DEVELOPMENT CODE FROM
MEDIUM-HIGH RESIDENTIAL (14-24
DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) AND
GENERAL COMMERCIAL TO MIXED USE
WITH A SENIOR HOUSING OVERLAY
DISTRICT FOR 3.24 ACRES OF LAND,
LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF
AMETHYST STREET, SOUTH OF THE
INTERSECTION WITH LA GRANDE STREET
AND NORTH OF THE INTERSECTION WITH
LOMITA DRIVE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 202-151-12
ORDINANCE NO. 625 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT NO. 00-01, A DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND NORTHTOWN
HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROVIDING A
SENIOR HOUSING PROJECT IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE SENIOR HOUSING
OVERLAY DISTRICT (SHOD), INCLUDING
DEVIATING FROM CERTAIN DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS FOR 80 to 96 SENIOR
APARTMENT UNITS AND ONE MANAGER
UNIT LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF
AMETHYST STREET, SOUTH OF THE
INTERSECTION WITH LA GRANDE STREET
AND NORTH OF THE INTERSECTION WITH
LOMITA DRIVE -APN: 202-151-12
60
66
City Council Agenda
July 5, 2000
3. CONSIDERATION OF DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 00-01 -
CITY OF RANCHQ CUCAMONGA - A proposal to add a Mixed Use
Zoning District with accompanying definitions, processing provisions,
and development standards to the Rancho Cucamonga Development
Code.
ORDINANCE NO. 626 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT
CODE AMENDMENT 00-01, TO ESTABLISH
MIXED USE DISTRICTS, WITH
ACCOMPANYING DEFINITIONS,
PROCESSING PROVISIONS, AND
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS BY AMENDING
SECTIONS 17.06.010.C.1, 17.08.020,
17.08.030 AND 17.08.040A OF THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA DEVELOPMENT CODE, AND
MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF
4. CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING
CHAPTER 3.48 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE
TO REDUCE THE UTILITY USER'S FEES
ORDINANCE NO. 558-D (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 3.48 OF
THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL
CODE PERTAINING TO UTILITY USER'S
FEES
85
89
F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public
hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to
receive public testimony.
APPEAL OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 99-72 - RYLAND HOMES -
The appeal of the Planning Commission's approval of the design review
of building elevations and detailed site plan for 78 homes within
Tentative Tracts 15911 and 15912 in the Low-Medium Residential
District (4-8) dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan,
located on the southwest and northeast corners of East Avenue and the
Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way. APN: 227-131-05 and 227-141-
11 and 12. Related File: Variance 99-11. (CONTINUED FROM JUNE
21, 2000)
94
City Council Agenda
July 5, 2000
8
RESOLUTION NO. 00-103
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, UPHOLDING THE ACTION OF
THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND
APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 99-72
THE APPEAL OF THE DESIGN REVIEW OF
BUILDING ELEVATIONS AND DETAILED SITE
PLAN FOR 78 HOMES WITHIN TENTATIVE
TRACTS 15911 AND 15912 IN THE LOW-
MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (4-8
DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE
ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED ON
THE SOUTHWEST AND NORTHEAST
CORNERS OF EAST AVENUE AND THE
SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-
WAY - APN: 227-131-05 AND 227-141-11
AND12
APPEAL OF VARIANCE 99-11 - RYLAND HOMES - The appeal of the
Planning Commission's approval of a request to construct perimeter
tract wails up to approximately 21 feet high where a maximum height of
6 feet is permitted for freeway noise mitigation purposes for Tracts
15911 and 15912 in the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling
units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the southwest
and northeast corners of East Avenue and the Southern Pacific right-of-
way. APN: 227-131-05 and 227-141-11 and 12. Related Files:
Development Review 99-72., Tentative Tract 15911 and 15912.
(CONTINUED FROM JUNE 21, 2000)
RESOLUTION NO. 00-104
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, UPHOLDING THE ACTION OF
THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND
APPROVING VARIANCE NO. 99-11 TO
ALLOW WALLS UP TO APPROXIMATELY 21
FEET IN HEIGHT FOR FREEWAY NOISE
MITIGATION PURPOSES WHERE A
MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF SIX FEET IS
ALLOWED, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST
AND NORTHEAST CORNERS QF EAST
AVENUE AND THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC
RIGHT-OF-WAY IN THE LOW-MEDIUM
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (4-8 DWELLING
UNITS PER ACRE), AND MAKING FINDINGS
IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227-131-05
AND 227-141-11 AND 12
116
94
119
City Council Agenda
July 5, 2000
9
The following
requirements.
testimony.
G. PUBLIC HEARINGS
items have no legal publication or posting
The Chair will open the meeting to receive public
No Items Submitted.
H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS
The following items do not legally require any public testimony,
although the Chair may open the meeting for public input.
No Items Submitted.
I. COUNCIL BUSINESS
The following items have been requested by the City Council for
discussion. They are not public hearing items, although the Chair
may open the meeting for public input.
No Items Submitted.
J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
This is the time for City Council to identify the items they wish to
discuss at the next meeting. These items will not be discussed at this
meeting, only identified for the next meeting.
K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
This is the time and place for the general public to address the City
Council. State law prohibits the city Council from addressing any
issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Council may
receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting.
Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual.
L. ADJOURNMENT
I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my
designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing
agenda was posted on June 29, 2000, seventy two (72) hours prior to
the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center
Drive.
June 7, 2000
CITY OF RANCNO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION MINUTES
A. CALL TO ORDER
The Rancho Cucamonga City Council held a dosed session on Wednesday, June 7, 2000, in the
Tapia Room of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga,
California. The meeting was called to order at 5:33 p.m. by Mayor William J. Alexander.
Present were Councilmembers: Pau~ Biane, James Curatalo, Bob Outton, Diane Walljams, and
Mayor William J. Alexander.
Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager; James
Markman, City Attorney; Larry Temple, Administrative Services Director; and George Rivera,
Administrative Services Manager.
B. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEMS
Mayor William J. Alexander announced the item to be discussed in closed session.
BI. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957.6
TO GiVE GEORGE RIVERA, ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES MANAGER; PAMELA EASTER,
DEPUTY CITY MANAGER; AND LARRY TEMPLE, ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIRECTOR,
DIRECTION IN REGARDS TO THE MEET AND CONFER PROCESS. - CITY
C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC ON CLOSED SESSION ITEMS ONLY
No one was present to comment on the closed session item listed above.
D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION
Closed session began at 5:35 p.m.
E. RECESS
THE CLOSED SESSION RECESSED AT 6:40 P.M. TO THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
AT 7:00 P.M. IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS AT CITY HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE,
RANCHO CUCAMONGA. NO ACTION WAS TAKEN IN EXECUTIVE SESSION.
City Council Minutes
June 7, 2000
Page 2
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCILMINUTES
Reqular Meetinq
A. CALL TO ORDER
A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, June 7, 2000, in
the Council Chambers of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga,
California. The meeting was called to order at 7:02 p.m. by Mayor William J. Alexander.
Present were Councilmembers: Paul Biane, James Curatalo, Bob Dutton, Diane W]lliams, and
Mayor William J. Alexander.
Also present were: Jack Lain, City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Linda D. Daniels,
Redevelopment Agency Director; Larry Temple, Administrative Services Director; Ingrid Bruce,
GIS/Special Districts Supervisor; Sid Siphomsay, Information Systems Analyst; Sam Davis,
Information Systems Specialist; Rick Gomez, Community Development Director; Brad Buller, City
Planner; Brent LeCount, Associate Planner; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Walt Stickney, Associate
Engineer; Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director; Paula Pachon, Management Analyst II;
Deborah Clark, Library Director; Ron Mayfield, Battalion Chief and Kim Grahn, Fire Prevention
Specialist, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Captain Rodney Hoops, Rancho Cucamonga
Police Department; James Frost, City Treasurer; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk.
B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS
B1. Presentation to the Hillside Community Church recognizing their efforts in organizing the
"Soapbox 2000 and Mega Fun Play Day."
Mayor Alexander presented a plaque to Pastor Burns and thanked him for the efforts of Hillside
Community Church in organizing such a fabulous event.
B2. Mayor Alexander announced there have been some tragic events in the City concerning swimming
pool safety and stressed how important it was to always remember this.
Ron Mayfield, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, talked about a campaign to make people
aware of swimming pool safety. He stated there would be a preconference tomorrow with Channel 7 to
educate people.
Councilmember Biane asked that this go on the City's website as well.
C, COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
C1. George Georgiou asked forthe Mayor to resign and felt the Council was not doing their job. He
stated he is trying to get his appeal heard and cannot get the City to schedule his hearing. He stated
the last correspondence he received was in April, 2000 from Bill Curley of the City Attorney's office
and added he has not heard from the City since.
City Council Minutes
June 7,200
Page 3
Mayor Alexander asked Jim Markman, City Attorney, to update everyone about the appeal of Mr.
Georgiou.
Jim Markman, City Attorney, gave history of what has happened with Mr. Georgiou's building matter.
He stated as far as he was concerned the matter can go before the Building Board of Appeals. He
stated he would see that this moved forward as quickly as possible.
D. CONSENT CALENDAR
Jack Lam, City Manager, removed items 7 and 13 from the Consent Calendar.
Councilmember Willlares asked that items 8 and 9 be pulled for discussion.
D1. Approval of Minutes: May 3, 2000 May 16, 2000 (Special Meeting)
May 17, 2000
D2. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 5/10/00 and 5/17/00 and Payroll ending 5/11/00 for the total
amount of $2,553,538.57.
D3. Approval of a Resolution to certify the results of the Special Community Facilities District Election
held in the City of Rancho Cucamonga on May 9, 2000.
RESOLUTION NO. 00-091
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECITING THE FACT OF THE SPECIAL
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT ELECTION HELD IN THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ON MAY 9, 2000, DECLARING THE RESULTS
AND SUCH OTHER MATI'ERS AS PROVIDED BY THE PROVISIONS
OF THE LAW
D4. Approval of authorization for the replacement purchase of five (5) fleet vehicles from local
dealerships to be selected through comparative off-the-lot pricing, not to exceed the amount of
$98,000.00, funded from Fund 72-4225-7045 and $33,500.00 from Account 142-4451-7045.
D5. Approval of a request to make a determination of Public Convenience or Necessity 00-03 (PCN),
Chevron, for the transfer of an existing Alcohol Beverage Control License (Off-Sale General) for a
remodeled Chevron service station with convenience store, located at the southwest corner of
Carnelian Avenue and Base Line Road -APN: 207-022-41
RESOLUTION NO. 00-092
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A DETERMINATION OF
PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY AND A REQUEST FOR THE
ISSUANCE OF AN ALCOHOL BEVERAGE LICENSE FOR A SERVICE
STTION AND CONVENIENCE STORE LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST
CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND CARNELIAN AVENUE, AND
MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 207-022-41
City Council Minutes
June 7, 2000
Page 4
D6. Approval of a request to make a determination of Public Convenience or Necessity 00-01 (PCN),
Ultramart, for the issuance of a Type 20 Alcohol Beverage License (Off Sale Beer and Wine) for a gas
station/mini-market, located at the northwest corner of Archibald Avenue and San Bernardino Road -
APN: 208-131-25 and 32. Related File CUP 00-05.
RESOLUTION NO. 00-093
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A DETERMINATION OF
PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY AND A REQUEST FOR THE
ISSUANCE OF AN ALCOHOL BEVERAGE CONTROL LICENSE WITHIN
A MINI-MARKET OF A SERVICE STATION, LOCATED AT THE
NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAN BERNARDINO ROAD AND
ARCHIBALD AVENUE -APN: 208-131-25 AND 32
D7. Approval of a request to make a determination of Public Convenience or Necessity (PCN), Kaur
- D.J. Market and Cheap Smoke, for the issuance of a Type 20 and 21 Alcohol and Beverage License
(Off Sale Beer and Wine and Distilled Spirits) in a mini-market/liquor store in a leased space of 1,925
square feet of an existing shopping center in the Community Commercial designation of the Foothill
Boulevard Specific Plan (Subarea 3), located at 9849 Foothill Blvd., Suite C - APN: 208-301-16.
Related File: CUP 00-06. ITEM REMOVED FROM AGENDA.
RESOLUTION NO. 00-094
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMQNGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A DETERMINATION OF
PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY AND A REQUEST FOR THE
ISSUANCE OF AN ALCOHOL BEVERAGE LICENSE FOR A MINI-
MARKET/LIQUOR STORE, IN THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL
DESIGNATION OF THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN
(SUBAREA E), LOCATED AT 9849 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, SUITE "C,"
AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 208-301-16
D8. Approval of acceptance of $10,000 from the Friends of the Rancho Cucamonga Public Library
and approval to appropriate $5,000 into the Library Expenditure Account. PULLED FOR
DISCUSSION.
D9. Approval of acceptance of $20,000 donation from the Rancho Cucamonga Public Library
Foundation to appropriate $20,000 into the Library Expenditure Account. PULLED FOR
DISCUSSION.
D10. Approval of light variance request for All-Star Tournament hosted by Alta Loma Little League,
Citrus Little League and Deer Canyon Little League on July 1- August 10, 2000, at Heritage Park.
D11. Approval of a Resolution Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B
and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for DR 99-69, located at the northwest corner of
9th Street and Hellman Avenue, submitted by Robert Gibbs.
RESOLUTION NO. 00-095
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF
CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NQS. 1
AND 6 FOR DR 99-69
City Council Minutes
June 7, 200
Page 5
D12. Approval of Maps, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities, Interim Basin
Maintenance Agreement and Ordering the Annexation to Street Light Maintenance Districts No. 1 and
8 for Tract Maps Number 15711-1 and 15711-2, located north of Foothill Boulevard, east of Etiwanda
Avenue, south of Interstate 15 Freeway and west of East Avenue, submitted by RC Homes, LL.
RESOLUTION NO. 00-096
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAPS NO. 15711-1
AND 15711-2, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT
SECURITIES, AND INTERIM BASIN MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
RESOLUTION NO. 00-097
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF
CERTAIN TERRITORY TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE
DISTRICTS NO. 1 AND 8 FOR TRACT MAPS 15711-1 AND 15711-2
D13. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security, Interim Basin Maintenance
Agreement and Ordering the Annexation to Street Light Maintenance Districts No. 1 and 8 for Tract
Map Number 15912, located at the southwest corner of East Avenue and the Southern Pacific
Railroad Right-of-Way, submitted by Ryland Homes. ITEM REMOVED FROM AGENDA.
RESOLUTION NO. 00-098
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP NO. 15912,
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND
INTERIM BASIN MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
RESOLUTION NO. 00-099
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF
CERTAIN TERRITORY TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE
DISTRICTS NO. 1 AND 8 FOR TRACT MAPS NUMBER 15912
D14. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 14207, located at Wilson Avenue,
west of Beryl, south of Heritage, submitted by H & W Concordia RC-28, LLC.
RESOLUTION NO. 00-100
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPRQVING IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR
TRACT 14207
City Council Minutes
June 7,2000
Page 6
D15. Approval and authorization of execution of the Contract (00-035) in the amount of $483,277.53
($439,343.21, plus 10% contingency) for the construction of East Avenue and Victoria Street
Improvements, to be apparent low bidder, All American Asphalt, to be funded from Account No. 22-
4637-9917.
D16. Approval to accept the Metrolink Corridor Beauti~cation Project, Contract No. 99-090 as
complete, release the bonds and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and
approve the final contract amount of $241,625.17.
RESOLUTION NO. 00-101
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE METROLINK
CORRIDOR BEAUTIFICATION PROJECT AS COMPLETE, AND
AUTHORIZE THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE
WORK
D17. Approval and execution of a Cooperative Agreement between the State of California (State), the
San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (Authority), and the City of Rancho Cucamonga
(City) for construction of Segment 3 of State Route 210 (30) in the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California.
RESOLUTION NO. 00-102
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE EXECUTION OF A
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
(STATE), THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION
AUTHORITY (AUTHORITY), AND THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA (CITY) FOR CONSTRUCTION OF SEGMENT 3 OF
STATE ROUTE 210 (30) IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA
DISCUSSION OF ITEM D8. APPROVAL OF ACCEPTANCE OF $10,000 FROM THE FRIENDS OF
THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PUBLIC LIBRARY AND APPROVAL TO APPROPRIATE $8,000
INTO THE LIBRARY EXPENDITURE ACCOUNT.
Councilmember WilIiams stated there is now a total of $75,000 donated by the Friends of the Library.
She encouraged everyone to donate their books to the Friends Store so they can be resold by the
Bookstore.
DISCUSSION OF ITEM D9. APPROVAL OF ACCEPTANCE OF $20,000 DONATION FROM THE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION TO APPROPRIATE $20,000 INTO
THE LIBRARY EXPENDITURE ACCOUNT.
Councilmember Wdliams stated the donations from the Library Foundation prove how effective the
Library Telethon really is. She thanked the community for its success.
MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Dutton to approve the staff recommendations in the staff
reports contained within the Consent Calendar with the exception of items D7 and D13. Motion
carried unanimously 5-0.
No Items Submitted.
E. CONSENT ORDINANCES
City Council Minutes
June 7, 200
Page ?
F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
F1. APPEAL OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 99-72 - RYLAND HOMES - The appeal of the Planning
Commission's approval of the design review of building elevations and detailed site plan for 78 homes
within Tentative Tracts 15911 and 15912 in the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8) dwelling units
per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the southwest and northeast corners of East
Avenue and the Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way. APN: 227-131-05 and 227-141-11 and 12.
Related File: Variance 99-11.
Staff report presented by Brent LeCount, Principal Planner.
Councilmember Curatalo stated he likes alternate #2 on page 98 in the agenda packet.
Mayor Alexander asked if there were any occupied homes that might be affected.
Brent LeCount, Associate Planner, stated no.
Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council were:
Jim Banks stated noise created by the 1-15 Freeway is a problem. He did not feel the solution
proposed was the best solution for the problem. He felt the 21 foot wall was unattractive. He felt
it was three times higher than the City Ordinance normally allows. Mr. Banks did not feel the wall
would be very effective and stated he questioned the height of it. He did not feel shrubs would
hide the wall and would not take care of the noise problems. Mr. Banks felt the holes at the
bottom of the wall would not work either because of what could crawl through them into people's
yards. He felt the wall up by the freeway should only be six foot high, not twenty-one foot tall.
Mr. Banks felt it would be possible to do CC&R's or Deed Restrictions to make sure the
vegetation is taken care of. He felt the Etiwanda Specific Plan should be a viable document and
felt if it had been followed, the wall would not be planned to be this high. He asked the Council
consider his comments.
Jim Frost talked about the information that was presented to the Planning Commission. He also
displayed a diagram for the Council to view. He talked about the aesthetics of the 21 foot wall
stating he did not like that. He did not feel it would be safe to walk along the high wall for people
walking to Etiwanda High School. He felt if the wall is six foot high people would not open their
windows because of people being able to look into their homes from the freeway.
A woman, who did not identity herself, stated she did not feel a six foot wall would be as bad as a
seventeen foot wall. She felt it would help the graffiti issue. She questioned how trees and
shrubs would get watered.
Dr. Ralph Klineman stated he agreed with Mr. Banks and felt the seventeen foot wall would stop
future development from occurring.
City Council Minutes
June 7, 2000
Page 8
John Lyons of Etiwanda felt the trees being cut down would increase the freeway noise. He
hoped the Council would work on this problem.
John Melcher, representing Ryland Homes as well as Mr. Garcia, stated they have worked hard
on this project and that every issue brought up tonight has been carefully considered. He stated
they ask the appeal be denied.
Councilmember Dutton asked how he felt about the six foot wall on top of the freeway.
Mr. Melcher stated if the Council feels this is appropriate, then they should give the developer
some time to consider it before it is implemented.
Carlos Garcia, Ryland Homes, stated he would have to consider the six foot wall on top of the
freeway. He stated he would have to talk to Caltrans and look into this.
Councilmember Curatalo asked if he was concerned about safety as well as cost.
Mr. Garcia stated he felt the wall could be constructed and be safe. He showed some pictures as
to what the project would look like.
Councilmember Dutton asked who would be responsible for the landscaping.
Mr. Garcia stated part of it is in a landscape maintenance district and part of it would be Caltrans.
Mayor Alexander asked if the walls are p~aced on the freeway property or are they on private property.
Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, stated where people were cooperative, their six foot garden wall was to be
replaced with the freeway sound wall. If the people weren't cooperative, then they would build the
sound wall on the freeway right-of-way.
Councilmember W~lliams asked if there are two story houses along the lots adjacent to the wall.
Mr. Garcia stated yes.
Councilmember Biane asked if the developer would consider the six foot high wall to go on top of the
freeway.
Mr. Garcia stated they would if so directed, but had not considered that so far. He stated they
would go along with whatever is approved and will work with staff.
Brad Buller, City Planner, stated if the wall goes up, they would plant vining along it and then it would
require irrigation.
There being no further public comment, the public hearing was closed.
Councilmember Curatalo stated he would like to have the six foot wall option looked into.
Councilmember Biane stated he would also and would like to continue the matter until that is done.
Councilmember Dutton stated he is concerned about the graffiti issue on the wall, but feff the six foot
wall would be better than the higher wall.
Mayor Alexander reopened the public hearing for purposes of continuing the matter to the next meeting.
RESOLUTION NO. 00-103
City Council Minutes
June 7,200
Page 9
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING AN APPEAL OF THE
PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT
REVIEW 99-72 THE APPEAL OF THE DESIGN REVIEW OF BUILDING
ELEVATIONS AND DETAILED SITE PLAN FOR 78 HOMES WITHIN
TENTATIVE TRACTS 15911 AND 15912 IN THE LOW-MEDIUM
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE
ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST AND
NORTHEAST CORNERS OF EAST AVE. AND THE SOUTHERN
PACIFIC RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY -APN: 227-131-05 AND 227-141-
11&12
APPEAL OF VARIANCE 99-11 - RYLAND HOMES - The appeal of the Planning Commission's
approval of a request to construct perimeter tract walls up to approximately 17 feet high where a
maximum height of 6 feet is permitted for freeway noise mitigation purposes for Tracts 15911 and
15912 in the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific
Plan, located on the southwest and northeast corners of East Avenue and the Southern Pacific right-
of-way. APN: 227-131-05 and 227-141-11 and 12. Related File: Development Review 99-72.
RESOLUTION NO. 00-104
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING AN APPEAL OF THE
PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION APPROVING VARIANCE NO.
99-11 TO ALLOW WALLS UP TO APPROXIMATELY 21 FEET IN
HEIGHT FOR FREEWAY NOISE MITIGATION PURPOSES WHERE A
MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF SIX FEET IS ALLOWED, LOCATED ON THE
SOUTHWEST AND NORTHEAST CORNERS OF EAST AVENUE AND
THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RIGHT-OF-WAY IN THE LOW-MEDIUM
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), AND
MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227-131-05 AND
227-141-11 AND 12.
MOTION: Moved by Dutton, seconded by Willlares to continue the item to June 21, 2000, 7:00 p.m.
in the Council Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Motion carried unanimously 5-0.
G. PUBLIC HEARINGS
G1. CONSIDERATION OF FORMATION OF LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 9 FOR
TRACTS 15911 AND 15912, LOCATED NORTH OF BASE LINE ROAD ON BOTH SIDES OF EAST
AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY RYLAND HOMES, AND FOR TRACTS 15711-1 AND 15711-2,
LOCATED NORTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, EAST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, SOUTH OF THE
INTERSTATE 15 FREEWAY AND WEST OF EAST AVENUE, SUBMI'I'I'ED BY RC HOMES
Staff report presented by Walt Stickney, Associate Engineer.
Mayor Alexander asked the City Clerk if the proper noticing had been done as required by law.
City Council Minutes
June 7, 2000
Page ]0
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, responded yes.
Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing
was dosed.
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk announced that she had tabulated the ballots and it is a unanimous vote to
approve the proposed annual landscape maintenance assessment.
RESOLUTION NO. 00-105
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE RESULTS OF
ASSESSMENT BALLOT TABULATION, FORMING LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 9, ORDERING WORK THEREIN AND
CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT AND PROVIDING
FOR THE LEVY OF THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENT THEREIN
MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Willlares to approve Resolution No. 00-015. Motion carried
unanimously 5-0.
H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS
H1. CONSIDERATION TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT
NO. 84-1 (DAY CREEK DRAINAGE SYSTEM) WITHOUT AN INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE
Staff report for items H1, H2, H3, H4 and H5 was presented by Jack Lam, City Manager, who stated
there are no increases recommended to the current rate.
Councilmember Biane asked if this could be done every three years instead of every two years.
James Markman, City Attorney, stated no that it has to be done every year.
Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public input. There being no response, public comments
were closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 00-106
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL
TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 84-1 (DAY CREEK
DRAINAGE SYSTEM)
MOTION: Moved by Willlares, seconded by Biane to approve Resolution Nos. 00-106, 00-107, 00-
108, 00-109 and 00-110. Motion carried unanimously 5-0.
H2. CONSIDERATION TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT
NO. 93-3 (FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE) WITHOUT AN INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE
City Council Minutes
June 7,200
Page i ~_
RESOLUTION NO. 00-107
A RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL
TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 93-3 (FOOTHILL
MARKETPLACE)
SEE ABOVE FOR DISCUSSION AND ACTION
H3. CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING AN ANNUAL LEVY WITHIN
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 93-1 (MASI PLAZA), AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER QF
ROCHESTER AVENUE AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, DRAINAGE AREA NO. 91-2 (DAY CANYON
DRAINAGE BASIN) AND REASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1999-1 WITHOUT AN INCREASE TO
THE CURRENT RATE
RESOLUTION NO. 00-108
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA CALIFORNIA, RE-AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF AN
ASSESSMENT SURCHARGE FOR THE EXPENSES INCURRED IN
THE COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS IN VARIOUS SPECIAL
ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS
SEE ABOVE FOR DISCUSSION AND ACTION
H4. CONSIDERATION TO SET ANNUAL BENEFIT ASSESSMENTS FOR DRAINAGE AREA NO.
91-2 (DAY CANYON DRAINAGE BASIN) WITHOUT AN INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE
RESOLUTION NO. 00-109
A RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING THE COST OF SERVICE
TO BE FINANCED BY BENEFIT ASSESSMENTS TO BE LEVIED IN
DRAINAGE AREA NO. 91-2 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2000-2001 AND
DETERMINING AND IMPOSING SUCH BENEFIT ASSESSMENT
SEE ABOVE FOR DISCUSSION AND ACTION
H5. CONSIDERATION TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT
NO. 88-2 (DRAINAGE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT) AT CURRENT LEVELS WITHOUT AN
INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE
RESOLUTION NO. 00-110
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL
TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-2 (DRAINAGE
AND LAW ENFORCEMENT)
SEE ABOVE FOR DISCUSSION AND ACTION
City Council Minutes
June 7, 2000
Page ]2
No Items Submitted.
I. COUNCIL BUSINESS
J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
No items were identified for the next meeting.
K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
K1. George Georgiou stated he did not feel the hearing of February 23, 2000 was for the appeal he
filed on April 19, 1999. He wondered why this was a courtesy meeting as had been stated.
Mayor Alexander explained why the appeal hearing of February 23 took place and stated he can
have his appeal before the Building Board of Appeals experts if he would like to.
L. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Williams to adjourn to Monday, June 12, 2000, 5:30 p.m. to
consider and adopt the budgets for fiscal year 2000/2001 to be held in the Council Chambers at the
Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Respectfully submitted,
Approved: *
Debra J. Adams, CMC
City Clerk
June 12, 2000
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Adjourned Meetinq
A. CALL TO ORDER
An adjourned meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Monday, June 12, 2000,
in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho
Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 5:45 p.m. by Mayor William J. Alexander.
Present were Councilmembers: Paul Biane, James Curatalo, Bob Dutton, Diane Williams, and Mayor
William J. Alexander.
Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager; Linda D. Daniels,
Redevelopment Agency Director; Larry Temple, Administrative Services Director; Tamara Layne,
Finance Officer; George Rivera, Administrative Services Manager; Ingrid Bruce, GIS/Special Districts
Supervisor; Rose Colum, Budget Analyst; Rick Gomez, Community Development Director; Bill
Makshanoff, Building Official; Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director; Paula Pachon,
Management Analyst II; Deborah Clark, Library Director; Chief Dennis Michael, Rancho Cucamonga
Fire Protection District; Lt. Dave Lau, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; Duane Baker,
Assistant to the City Manager; Diane O'Neal, Assistant to the City Manager; and Debra J. Adams,
City Clerk.
B. PUBLICHEARINGS
B1. ADOPTION OF FISCAL YEAR 2000/2001 BUDGET AND ARTICLE XIII-B APPROPRIATIONS
LIMIT
Staff report presented by Jack Lam, City Manager.
Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing
was closed.
Councilmember Dutton pointed out that the utility tax was being reduced and is now at 2.46% and also
the largest reduction to occur.
Jack Lam, City Manager, told about the process to go through to reduce the utility tax which was to be
considered by the City Council at their June 21, 2000 meeting.
RESOLUTION NO. 00-111
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE CITY'S FISCAL YEAR
2000/2001 BUDGET
City Council Minutes
June 12,2000
Page 2
RESOLUTION NO. 00-112
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING AN APPROPRIATIONS
LIMIT PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XIII-B OF THE CALIFORNIA STATE
CONSTITUTION FOR FISCAL YEAR 2000/2001
MOTION: Moved by Dutton, seconded by Biane to approve Resolution Nos. 00-111 and 00-112. Motion
carried unanimously 5-0.
C. ITEM OF DISCUSSION
C1. APPROVAL OF ANNUAL LOAN TRANSACTION BETVVEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA AND THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Staff report presented by Jack Lam, City Manager.
MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Dutton to approve the annual loan transaction. Motion carried
unanimously 5-0.
D. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
No communication was made from the public,
E. ADJOURNMENT
Jack Lam, City Manager, stated staff needs an executive session as listed below and asked for the
Council to vote to add this item:
"CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957.6 TO
GIVE GEORGE RIVERA, DEPUTY CITY MANAGER, AND LARRY TEMPLE, ADMINISTRATIVE
SERVICES DIRECTOR, DIRECTION IN REGARDS TO THE MEET AND CONFER PROCESS."
MOTION: Moved by Curatalo, seconded by Williams to add the item listed above. Motion carried
unanimously 5-0.
Mayor Alexander announced the meeting was adjourned at 5:50 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Approved: *
Debra J, Adams, CMC
City Clerk
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA
LIST OF WARRANTS
FOR PERIOD: 06-14-00
4635 A & K PHOTOORAPHY
7
22051
4347
22058
6172
22047
436~
32543
2205e
6311
68
713
73
643
A & R TIRE SERVICE
ABBEY EVENTS SERVICES
ABC LOCKSMITHS
ABLETRONICS
ABSTRACT DESION & MACHINE
ACCURATE SMOg, AUTO, TRUCK
ADAMSON, RONALD
ADLER PUBLIC AFFAIRS
AEF SYSTEMS CONSULTINO, INC.
AIR CONTROLLED ENVIRONMENTS
AIR FLOW MECHANICAL
ALEXANDER, WILLIAM
ALEXOPOULOS, DIMITRIO
ALL WELDINg
ALTA FIRE EGUIPMENT CO.
ALTA LOMA CHARTER LINES
ALTA LOMA FINANCIAL CORP.
AMERICAN FIRST AID & SAFETY
AMERICAN LIBRARY ASSOCIATION
AMERICAN SCALE CO., INC,
AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES
ARKOIAN, RAM
ARTCRAFT, INC.
ASSI SECURITY
ASSOCIATED OROUP
ATS SOUTHEAST~ INC.
B & K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE
BARTLIN~, STEVE
BASSETT-SMITH~ TERRI
BELVEDERE ROOFINO, INC.
BEST BUY CO,~ INC.
BETTER ENEROY IDEAS
BIO 0 TIRES
BRODART BOOKS
BROWN, JAC~
BUILDIN~ & COMPUTER ELECTRIC
CAL COVER PRODUCTS
CALIF. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTORS ASSOC.
CALIFORNIA LITERACY, INC.
CENTRAL CITIES SI~NS~ INC.
CHAFFEY JOINT UNION H,S. DISTRICT
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
CHAVARRIA, DIANNS
CHICK~S SPORTINS GOODS INC
CITATION HONES
CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO, INC.
CITY RENTALS
COMPUTERLAND
PHOTO DEVELOPINO ~ SUPPLIES 152718 8.10
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE ~ 152720 2,045,81
RECREATION SUPPLIES 152721 52.50
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES ~ 152722 7e3.5~
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 152723 23,27
BUSINESS LICENSE 152724 7.00
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES # 152725 1~033,80
INSPECTION SERVICES ~ 152726 2,848.00
PR0FESSIONAL SERVICES 152727 30,5~2,44
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 152728 1~350.00
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 15272e 48~.72
BUSINESS LICENSE 152730 18,80
REFUND 152731 114.00
RELEASE OF DEPOSIT 152732 500.00
MAINTENANCE REPAIRS 152733 1~2e3.00
SERVICE/SUPPLIES 152734 21.77
CHARTER SERVICES 152735 4eO. O0
BUSINESS LICENSE 152736 24.21
SUPPLIES # 152737 8038
OFFICE SUPPLIES 152738 75.00
BUSINESS LICENSE 15273~ 8.71
MONTHLY SERVICE 152740 180.18
BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 152741 240.00
BUSINESS LICENSE 152742 42.60
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 152743 1~55.22
MONTHLY MAINTENANCE SERVICE 152744 2~150.17
BUSINESS LICENSE 152745
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 152746 1,500.40
SETTLEMENT PAYMENT 152747 700.00
RECREATION REFUND 152748 33.48
BUSINESS LICENSE 15274~ 28.11
OFFICE SUPPLIES # 152750 287.56
pROFESSIONAL SERVICES 152751 535,50
BUSINESS LICENSE 152752 13.08
C<C 152753 - 152757
LIBRARY SUPPLIES # 152758 3~542.71
REIMBURSEMENT 15275e 50.00
RELEASE OF DEPOSIT 152760 11000.00
RECREATION SUPPLIES 152761 1~0.00
RECREATION REFUND 152762 67. e4
MEMBERSHIP DUES 152763 75.00
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 152764 615.14
RENTAL - AUDITORIUM R.C,H.S. 152765 756.~e
MONTHLY PAYMENT # 152766 200,00
RECREATION REFUND 152767 60.00
RECREATION SUPPLIES 152768 154.38
RELEASE OF DEPOSIT 152769 2~500,00
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES # 152770 1,065,08
EQUIPMENT RENTAL/SUPPLIES # 152771 111.73
COMPUTER MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES # 152772 1~75e. 75
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
LIST OF WARRANTS
FOR PERIOD~ 06-14-00 (eelGo)
RUN DATE: 06/14/00 PAGE:
VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR. AMT.
4863 CONTEMPORARY BOOKS~ INC.
6648 CORDERO, CARLOS
83 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST
23g D & K CONCRETE CO
4128~ DALE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER, MARC
2478 DAPPER TIRE
1290 DEER CREEK CAR WASH
22049 DENNISONi AVERY
3744 DIRECTV
386~ DURO, KELLY
4205 DYNAMIC GRAPHICS, INC.
4~37 DYNASTY SCREEN PRINTING
779 E-Z RENTALS
5370 E-Z UP FACTORY OUTLET
3364 EIGHTH AVENUE GRAPHICS
5030 EL NATIVO GROWERSi INC.
2422 ELECTRONICS WAREHOUSE
4524 ELLISON EDUCATIONAL EGUIPMENT INC.
5937 EMPIRE FLOOR COVERING
3137 EMPIRE MOBILE HOME SERVICE
5137 EMPIRE MOBILE HOME SERVICE
2349 ESOIL CORP.
229 EWINO IRRIGATION PRODUCTS
6161 FAXON CO., THE
123 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP
2~09 FILTER RECYCLING SERVICE, INC.
41290 FIREHOUSE MAGAZINE
5892 FIRST PLACE TROPHIES
3088 FIRST STOP MOTORSPORTS~ INC.
4371 FISHER SCIENTIFIC
4762 FOOTHILL FAMILY SHELTER
2840 FORD OF UPLAND, INC.
~8 FORD PRINTING & MAILING, INC
4540 GALE GROUP, THE
41291 GARCIA, MATT
3827 GREEN ROCK POWER EGUIPMENT
137 GTE CALIFORNIA
56~9 HARALAMBOS BEVERAGE COMPANY
32535 HEALTH GROUP PSYCHOLOGICAL SERVICES
3125 HI STANDARD AUTOMOTIVE
4~28 HOCKEY WEST
158 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO., INC.
663e HOLMES ICE AND STORAOE, INC.
32289 HURSTi dOHN
834 I C M A
4188 I D BURR
4254 IBM CORPORATION
3736 INLAND EMPIRE SOCCER REFEREE ASSN.
3682 INLAND INDUSTRIAL MEDICAL GROUP
~ CHECK~ OVERLAP
LIBRARY BOOKS 132773 17.61
BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 152774 32.00
<<< 152773 - 152776
MONTHLY WATER BILLINGS # 152777 12,111.78
STREET MAINTENANCE # 152778 1,145.39
REFUND 152779 25.00
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES # 152780 210.82
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES 152781 45.50
BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 152782 ~8.71
SUBSCRIPTION 152783
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 152784 350.00
OFFICE EGUIPMENT 152785 58.95
RECREATION SUPPLIES 152786 53~.44
RECREATION RENTAL # 152787 935.32
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 152788 164.03
OFFICE SUPPLIES # 152789 1~017.60
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 1327~0 108.25
ELECTRONIC SUPPLIES 152791 41.72
LIBRARY SUPPLIES 152792 1,148.01
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 152793 210.00
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 152794 2~880.00
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 152795 3,400.00
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1527~6 30,660.51
IRRIGATION SUPPLIES 152797 52+12
LIBRARY SUBSCRIPTION ~ 152798 3,960.59
DELIVERY SERVICE ~ 1527~ 531.8~
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 152800 115.00
SUBSCRIPTION 152801 28.97
RECREATION SUPPLIES # 132802 344.26
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 152803 130.00
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 152804 1~037.30
FAMILY SHELTER 152805 250.00
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE # 152806 1,444.17
MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS 152807 807.43
LIBRARY BOOKS ~ 152808 235.52
REIMBURSEMENT 15280~ 6.83
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 152810 655.96
<{< 152811 - 152811
MONTHLY TELEPHONE BILLINGS # 152812 1,664.60
RECREATION SUPPLIES 152813 421.25
BUSINESS LICENSE 152814 11.7~
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 152815 518.~0
RECREATION 152816 180.10
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 132817 1,209+59
RECREATION REFUND 152818 301.75
REIMBURSEMENT # 152819 100.00
MEMBERSHIP DUES # 152820 73.39
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 152821 292.86
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 152822 838.99
MEN'S SOCCER PROGRAM # 132823 6,282.50
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 132824 32.80
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
LIST OF WARRANTS
FOR PERIOD~ 06-14-00 (99/00)
RUN DATE: 06/14/00 PAGE: 3
VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARM. AMT.
4747
4718
2507
32536
612
32043
6433
4147
5654
523
6584
235
3
INLAND LIBRARY SYSTEM
INLAND MAILING SERVICES, INC.
INLAND TOP SOIL MIXES
INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN
INVENSYS BUILDING SYSTEMS INC.
J.C. PRECISION
JAESCHKE INC., C,R,
JANECK, LINDA
JUMP FOR dOY
KAMIN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
KAPCO
KASHEFINEJAD~ FARISH
KELLER TRANSCRIPTION SERVICES
KELLEY BLUE BOOK
KING, L.D.
KOCH MATERIALS COMPANY
KONG, SOPHAK
KONOP~ LINDA
LA POINTE VIDEO PRODUCTION, JERRY
LAB SAFETY SUPPLY
LAERDAL MEDICAL CORPORATION
LEDESMA & MEYER CONSTRUCTION CO. INC
LOIKO, LORETTA
LONO'S DRUGS
LOS ANGELES CODA COLA BTL. DO.
LU'S LIGHTHOUSE~ INC.
MMASC
MANELA~ ROSARIO
MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT. INC.
MARK CHRISi INC.
MARSHALL PLUMBING
MATT'S HARDWARE
MAYER, COBLE & PALMER
MCGRAW-HILL, INC.
MEHAS CONSTRUCTION INC.
MELENDEZ, TONY
MICHAELS STORES INC. #301e
MIDWEST TAPE
MOBILE STORAGE GROUP, INC.
NAIOP
NATURE TECH LANDSCAPE
NIKPOUR, HOE
NIXON-EGLI EGUIPMENT
NJUGUNA, SAMMY
OFFICE DEPOT
OLIVA~ PHILIP
OWEN ELECTRIC
PACIFIC BELL
PACIFIC INN & HOTEL
PAPER DIRECT, INC.
** CHECK# OVERLAP
MEMBERSHIP DUES 152825 64.65
RECREATION REFUND 152826 323.44
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 152827 86.20
SUBSCRIPTIONS # 152828 le0.72
SERVICE/SUPPLIES # 15282~ 2,637.70
BUSINESS LICENSE 152830 20.00
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 152831 17.5e
REIMBURSEMENT 152832 8.4e
RECREATION REFUND 132833 180.00
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 152834 358.36
LIBRARY SUPPLIES 152835 345.28
BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 152836 1,505.00
BUSINESS LICENSE 152837 13.72
NEW CAR PRICE MANUAL # 152838 138.00
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 152839 38,627.13
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 152840 209.16
BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 152841 480.00
RECREATION 152842 40.00
RECREATION REFUND 152843 215.3g
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 152844 353.15
RECREATION SUPPLIES # 152845 680.~
BUSINESS LICENSE 152846 25.00
EMPLOYEE OF THE MONTH 152847 33.00
FILM PROCESSING # 152848 68.73
RECREATION SUPPLIES 152849 157.72
OIL ANALYSIS 152850 1,104.55
MEMBERSHIP 152851 12.00
REFUND PERS DEDUCTION # 152852 60.73
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ~ 152853 24,862.85
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 152854 143.55
REHAB. PROGRAM # 152855 221.54
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 152856 113.57
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 152857 37.50
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 152858 160. eO
BUSINESS LICENSE 152859 167.67
RECREATION REFUND 152860 400.00
RECREATION SUPPLIES # 152861 159.70
LIBRARY SUPPLIES # 152862 416.84
EGUIPMENT RENTAL # 152863 146.43
MEETINGS 152864 20.00
SPRUCE PARK # 152865 24,162.52
BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 152866 80.00
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 152867 &7.~2
RECREATION REFUND 152868 64.00
<<< 152869 - 152869
# 152870 31646.34
152871 120.00
152872 304.66
152873 1,113.26
152874 le8.78
152875 32.94
OFFICE SUPPLIES
RECREATION REFUND
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
MEETING
RECREATION SUPPLIES
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
LIST OF WARRANTS
FOR PERIOD: 06-14-00 {9~/00)
RUN DATE: 06/14/00 PAGE: 4
VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARM NO WARM. AMT.
22055
22061
32g3
32540
4267
2e87
6148
32541
251
18~0
228
228
2600
2257
3821
3527
6501
3665
5e14
6518
5618
626
12540
5537
4704
4438
5745
12541
581
581
1492
1238
132
5088
4350
12542
PELLETIER CONSTRUCTION, BRIAN
PENINSULA LIBRARY SYSTEM
PERFORMANCE AUTO BODY
PERFORMANCE HONDA SERVICE/REPAIR
PETE'S ROAD SERVICE
PHOENIX GROUP INFORMATION SYSTEMS
PIRON, SHAUN
PIZZA ROYAL
PLANNING CENTERI THE
POINDEXTER, TERRI
POMONA COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPT.
POMONA VALLEY KAWASA~I
POWERSTRIDE BATTERY CO., INC.
PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION, INC.
PRECISION DYNAMICS CORPORATION
PREMIER PERSONNEL
PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY
GUINN~ SHERLINE
R & R AUTOMOTIVE
R & R LIGHTING
RANCHO CUCA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
RANCHO CUCA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITIZEN PATROL#416
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT
RAUL'S AUTO TRIM, INC.
RE-PRINT CORPORATION
RECREONICS CORP.
REED, JOHN
REGULATION COMPLIANCEI INC.
REXEL CALCON ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
RHYTHM ENTERTAINMENT
RICHARDS, WATSON, & GERSHON
ROBLES, RAUL P. , SR.
ROCKY MOUNTAIN IND~ INC
ROYCE DI8ITAL SYSTEMS, INC.
RUSH, CHRIS
SCACEO
SAFELITE 8LASS CORP.
SALGADO, ELVA
SAN BERN COUNTY
SAN BERN COUNTY
SAN BERN COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DEPT
SAN BERN COUNTY LIBRARY
SAN DIE80 ROTARY BROOM CO~ INC
SANTA FE SPRINGS~ CITY OF
SCHNEIDERWENT~ KAR~N
SENCO PRODUCTS INC
SHARED TEG~.' '~AIRCHILD TELECOM, INC
SIGN' SHOP, THE
SIR SPEEDY
BUSINESS LICENSE
LIBRARY SUPPLIES
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
BUSINESS LICENSE
VEHICLE SERVICE & SUPPLIES
MONTHLY SERVICE
CONTRACT SERVICES
BUSINESS LICENSE
BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND
REIMBURSEMENT
RECREATION REFUND
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
EGUIPMENT RENTAL
RECREATION SUPPLIES
RECREATION REFUND
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND
<<< 152894
VEHICLE MAINT, SUPPLIES&SERVICE
MAINTENANCE SERVICE/SUPPLIES
REIMBURSE GRANT FUNDS
REIMBURSE GRANT FUNDS
RECREATION REFUND
SALARY AND BENEFITS
VEHICLE REPAIRS
OFFICE SUPPLIES
1ST AID SUPPLIES
RECREATION REFUND
TRAINING SERVICES
ELECTRICAL 8UPPLIES
RECREATION REFUNDS
LEGAL SERVICES
TIRE REPAIR
RECREATION REFUND
MAINTENANCE CONTRACT
INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT
ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP DUES
SERVICE AND SUPPLIES
RECREATION REFUND
CAL-ID PROGRAM
CAL-ID PROGRAM
INSPECTION FEE
OCTOBER SHREDDING
MAINT SUPPLIES
LITERACY PROGRAM
LIBRARY SUPPLIES
RECREATION REFUND
TELEPHONE SERVICES
MAINT SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
~ CHECK~ OVERLAP
152876 21.00
152877 50.00
152878 3,828.46
152879 15.32
~ 152880 1,150.83
152881 500.98
152882 180.00
152883 23.00
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
LIST OF WARRANTS
FOR PERIODz 06-1~-00 (ge/O0)
RUN DATE: 06/14/00 PAGE:
VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR. AMT.
1327 SMART ~ FINAL
36 SMIDERLE, BEA
317 SO CALIF EDI50N CO.
31~ SO CALIF GAS COMPANY
~* CHECK~ OVERLAP
DAY CAMP SUPPLIES ~ 152e27 1~1.47
PETTY CASH - COMMUNITY SVCS 152928 100.00
TOTAL 6, 596,613.99
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
LIST OF RARRANTS
FOR PERZOD: 06-21-00 C99100)
RUN DATE: 06/21/00 PAGE: 1
ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR ND WARRo ANT°
...................................................................................................... , ...., .........
~c~: CHECK6 OVERLAP
122 INLAND VALLEY DAZLT BULLETIN ADVERTISING
((( 150906 -
3006 CLASSE PARTY RENTALS EQUIPMENT RENTAL
((C 152099 -
3006 CLASSE PARTY RENTALS EQUIPMENT RENTAL
((< 132523 -
S318 PARKERm SHANNON INSTRUCTOR pAYHENT
((( 152627 -
1510 ZETTERBERG, 808
Z1674 COSTO WHOLESALE MEMBERSHIP
2Z058 ALEXOPOULOSm DIMITRZO
6337 REINHARDT, RZTA
6505 TDVARm ANNE MARGARET
6199 ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT
32557 ROEERTA COPPER
6451 A A AUTOMOTIVE
I AA EQUIPHENT RENTALS COo, ZNC.
6507 AAA pORTABLE RESTRODe CO.
6271 ABBEY EVENTS SERVICES
2732 ADC LOCKSMITHS
7 ABLETRONICS
4347 ACCURATE S~OGe AUTO° TRUCK
3785 ACTION ART
211 ADT SECURITY SERVZCES, ZNC.
1826 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR
2Z056 ALEXOPOULOS, DIHITRIO
3448 ALL WELDING
32559 ALNBLAO, KENNETH
973 ALpHAGRAPHICS
17 ALTA FIRE EQUIPMENT CO.
6172 ALTA LONA CHARTER LINES
Z836 ALTA LQNA HIGH SCHOOL
6201 ALTEC INDUSTRIES
1630 AMERICAN BUSINESS FORMS
409 AMERICAN EXPRESS
2693 AMTECM ELEVATOR SERVICES
32546 ANGULO9 DANIELLE
4417 APG COMPANY
310 ARRDR TRUCK BODIES & EQUIP ZNC
667
4782
6255
26
40Z
32556
~.~4102
REIMBURSEMENT
BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND
RELEASE OF DEPOSIT
RECREATION REFUNO
BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND
PROGRESS PAYMENT
RECREATION
RECREATION REFUND
VEHICLE MAZNTENANCEISUPPLZES
RECREATION REFUND
RECREATION SUPPLIES
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
MAINTENANCE SUPPLEES
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES
RECREATION SUPPLIES
ALARM SERVICE
CELLULAR PHONE BILLINGS
RELEASE OF DEPOSZT
MAINTENANCE REPAIRS
CASH ADVANCE
OFFICE SUPPLIES
SERVICE/SUPPLIES
CHARTER SERVICES
RENTAL - A.Lo H.So CAFETERIA
ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP DUES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
AMERICAN EXPRESS BILLINGS
MONTHLY SERVICE
RECREATION
PROFESSIONAL SERVICE
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
ARROMHEAD CREDIT UNZON
ASEURT ENVXRONHENTAL SERVICES
ASSZ SECURITY
ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS
AUTO RESTORATORS
AYLORe KIN
6 & K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE
VISA MONTHLY BILLINGS
PRCFESSZONAL SERVICES
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
PROFESSIONAL SERVXCES
VEHICLE MAENTENANCE
REFUND FEES
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
15Z716 -
151733 -
152970 -
152973 -
l
l
#
O
152999 -
150905~ 223°39-
152097
152098e 239.78-
1525Zl >))
152512 213o95-
1526Z5 >))
15Z626 Z04°00-
152713 >>)
152714~ 600.00
152715~ 312.46
152731
15Z732 500,00-
152967 >))
15Z968~ 860.00
152969~ 196,00
152970 )>)
152971~ 4,015.00
15Z972~ 39.00
15Z976 )))
152975 461.47
152976 165.08
152977 131°55
15Z978 ZTOoO0
152979 805,84
152980 372.78
152981 309.66
152982 h533.87
152983 282.00
152984 335,72
152985 500.00
152986 11293°00
152987 200.00
15Z988 616.37
152989 580,77
152990 230.00
152991 55,00
152992 1Z3,078.13
152993 h21Z.51
15299~ 55.00
152995 1,5Z9.83
152996 35.00
152997 2,960.00
152998 471.18
152999 )))
153000 2,700.13
153001 873.14
153002 1,567.50
153003 80640.00
153004 781.00
153005 7,800.00
153006 4~1Z0~41
CITY OF RANCHO CUCRNONGA
LIST OF NARRANTS
FOR PERIOD: 06-11-00 (99100)
RUN DATE= 06121/00 PAGE= Z
VENDOR NAME ZTEN DESCRIPTZDN MARR NO MARRo ANT.
32558 BASH, ROBBIN
325A7 BATIZ TRUCKING
666I BEST BUT CO., INCo
1167 BLAKE PAPER CO., INC.
3863 BOPKOw CHRISTOPHER
ZZ09 BRUCE, ZNGRZD
6772 BYRD AND ASSOCZATESw ZNC.
6949 C L 0 U T
5369 CAL COVER PRODUCTS
1851 CAL MESTERN PAINT
6612 CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC ENTRV
62 CALIFORNIA JOURNAL
1223 CALSENSE
3828 CAPITOL ENQUZRVf ZNC.
68 CENTRAL CITIES SIGNS, XNC.
1061 CHAMPION AWARDS S SPECIALITZES
6052 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS
73 CITRUS MOTORS ONTARZOw INC,
76 CITY RENTALS
12037 CLAREMDNT BIBLE CHAPEL
3006 CLASSE PARTY RENTALS
5533 CLAYTON GROUP SERVICES, INCo
6666 COASTAL BUZLDZNG SERVZCESe ZNC,
3073 COLORANA MHOLESALE NURSERY
663 CONPUTERLAND
2051 COUNTRY ESTATE FENCE CO.t INC.
3Z601 COXONe NZLLZAM
85
Z39
628Z
286
367
6302
6661
107
61Z92
109
839
3779
517
779
3366
61293
5937
5137
5521
126
6556
CHECK# OVERLAP
6640
1082
CUCAMQNGA CO WATER DIST
D & K CONCRETE CB
D 7 CONSULTING INCo
DAISY VHEEL RIBBON COo INC
DAy-TIMERS, ZNCo
DEAN, ZNCop STUART
DEL MECHANICAL
DETCO
DZCKZNSONp LISA
DXCTAPHONE CORP
OZETERZCH INTERNATIONAL TRUCK
DORNZNGw GLENN
E S R %g INCo
E-2 RENTALS
EIGHTH AVENUE GRAPHICS
ELNBLADe TRACY
EMPIRE FLOOR CDVERING
EMPIRE MOBILE HOME SERVICE
EXPERZBN
FENCE CRAFT OF UPLANDe INC.
FENESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES
FLUORESCO LIGHTING
FRANKLIN COVEY
CASH AOVANCE 153007 ZO0,O0
BUSINESS LICENSE 153008 6.40
OFFICE SUPPLIES t 153009 3,250.55
RECREATION SUPPLIES 153010 12,8A
ESRZ USER MEETING 153011 180.00
SCAG MEETING A 153012 360.00
pROFESSIONAL SERVICES 153013 Ze870oO0
REGISTRATION 153016 96°00
RECREATZON SUPPLIES 153015 125.00
NAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 153016 h683°59
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES/SERVICE 153017 170.00
SUBSCRIPTION 153018 39,95
OFFZCEIMAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT e 153019 2e509.03
OFFICE SUPPLIES 153020 30,19
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 153021 le638°89
ENGRAVED PLAQUE 15302Z 215.50
ADVERTISING FEE A 1530Z3 Ie393.00
VEHICLE NAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES I 153026 6t600,58
EQUIPMENT RENTAL/SUPPLIES 153025 55.00
RECREATION 153026 ZO0.O0
EQUZPNENT RENTAL I 153027 538.82
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 153028 307, T5
RECREATION REFUND 153029 16,605°00
LANDSCAPE NAZNTENANCE SUPPLIES 153030 153°80
COMPUTER MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES 153031 315.71
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES/REPAIRS I 153032 1,897o36
RECREATION 153033 65.00
((( 153036 - 153036
MON~HLT WATER BILLINGS 8 153035 8,223.36
STREET MAINTENANCE I 153036 3e096.82
MAINTENANCE REPAIRS/SUPPLiES g 153037 2,533.Z8
OFFZCE SUPPLIES 153038 100.90
OFFICE SUPPLIES t 153039 100.17
CONTRACT SERVICES 153060 607.31
SERVICE ~ REPAIR 153061 222.35
OFFICE SUPPLIES I 153062 98.05
RECREATION REFUND 183063 30.00
OFFICE SUPPLIES/REPAIRS e 153046 586.18
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE A 153065 95,616.28
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 153066 81.26
SOFTWARE SUPPORT FEES 153047 le600.00
RECREATION RENTAL 153068 375.88
OFFICE SUPPLIES # 153069 181.65
RECREATION REFUND 153050 39.50
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 153051
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 153052 Z,337.50
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 153053 50.00
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 153056 56.95
PERSONNEL SERVICES # 153055 2,799.00
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES/SERVICE I 153056 3t056.89
OFFICE SUPPLIES A 153057 114.86
CITY OF RANCHD CUCANONGA
LIST OF WARRANTS
FOR PERIOD: 06-21-00 C99/00)
RUN DATE: 06121/00 PAGE: 3
VENDOR MANE ITEM DESCRIPTION RARR NO NARR. ANT.
~ CHECKR OVERLAP
3928
6232
AlZ96
41063
2834
1684
3992
41Z95
650
137
137
325A8
32600
325A9
662
158
32216
1236
3634
2392
1121
1218
92
222
2507
6565
3905
2220
6090
1075
6578
5136
32602
5490
5662
32550
7Z
5851
ATZ7
5560
32551
3860
1171
G E SUPPLY
GADABOUT TOURS, ZNC
GAGNON, GARY
GARCZA, TERESA
GEIGER BROTHERS WEST
GENTRY BROSe INC.
GIBBV*S FENCING MATERIALS
GONSALVES & SON, JOE A.
GOVERNMENT INFORMATION SERVICES
GRAINGER,
GTE CALIFORNIA
GTE CALIFORNIA
H ~ S INDUSTRIES
HASELKORN, NARK
HANKINS, KAREL
HCS-CUTLER STEEL CO.
HOLLIDAY ROCK CO.e INC.
HOOD. SUZETTE
HOSENAN
HOUSE OF RUTH
HRS USA
HYDRO TEK SYSTEMS, INCo
HVDRO-SCAPE PRODUCTS, INC
Z D BURR
ZVMAA
INDEPENOENT ELECTRONICS
ZNOUSTRIAL DISTRIBUTION GROUP
INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN
INLAND VALLEY DAELV BULLETIN
INVENSYS BUILDING SVSTENS INC.
JOHNSON, CHARLOTTE
JOHNSONt CHEARICE
KELLY PAPER COMPANY
KONG, SOPHAK
LAB SAFETY SUPPLY
LANDATA AIRBORNE SYSTEMS
LENIS ~ LEWIS
LIN, NANCT
LIST, ERICH
LOS ANGELES COCA COLA BTL. CO.
MAOISON, ERIN
MARK CHRISm INC,
MARKETING SERVICES ZNT*L
MARSHALL PLUMBING
MARVAC
METRIC.PROPERTY MGMT INC.
MOBILE MINI, INC.
MOTOROLA COMMUNo & ELEC..,, ZNC
MR T°S ZA-HR. TONING
NAPA AUTO PARTS
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 153058 9,351.66
RECREATION e 153059 h63Ao20
REFUND 133060 ZOoO0
RECREATION REFUND 155061 39°00
OFFICE SUPPLIES 153062
PROGRESS PAVMENTS 153063 17,787.32
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 153066 1,775o00
LEGISLATIVE SERVICES 153065
SUBSCRIPTION 153066 339°00
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 153067 86.26
((( 153068 - 153068 )))
MONTHLY TELEPHONE BILLINGS e 153069 2,153o89
MONTHLY TELEPHONE BILLINGS 153070 53.27
BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS 153071 7o00
MISCELLANEOUS FEES 153072 1,000.00
CLASS REFUNDS 8 153073 77.00
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 153076 66°29
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 153075
RECRESTION 153076 180.00
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 153077 32.13
93/96 CDBG CONTRACT 153078 633.00
RECREATION SUPPLIES 153079 58.02
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 153080 860.79
LANDSCAPE NAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 153081 247.60
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 153082 Z,111.14
YOUTH FLAG FTBALL REGISTRATION 153083 567.00
MAINTENANCE t 153084 196.50
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 153085 2,660.36
SUBSCRIPTIONS 153086 Z08.32
ADVERTISING B 153087 1,575.19
SERVICE/SUPPLIES I 153088 8,122.96
SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL 153099 209.00
REIMBURSEMENT 153090 250.00
PAPER SUPPLIES e 153091 48°32
BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 153092 680.00
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 153093 2,817.95
REFUND PLAN CHECK FEE I 153084 17~175.00
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 153095 365.89
RECREATEON 153096 60.00
CASH ADVANCE 153097 100o00
RECREATION SUPPLIES 153098 1ZZ,55
OVERPAYMENT ON FEES 153099 1,916.25
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 153100 92.4Z
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 153101 1,027.86
REHAB. PROGRAM I 153102 5,Z48.78
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 153103 37.70
BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 153106 92.04
STORAGE SUPPLIES I 153105 523.68
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES e 153106 763.84
TOWING 153107 90.00
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE I 153108 Z77.61
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
LIST OF WARRANTS
FOR PERIOD: 06-21-00 (99/00)
RUN DATE: 06/21/00 PAGES
ITEM DESCRIPTION WARE NO WARR, A~o
VENDOR NAME
~ CHECKI OVERLAP
766 NATIONAL DEFERRED DEFERRED COMP 153109 ZeZ86.00
2111 NATIONAL FIRE pROTECTION ASSOC. HANDBOOKS 153110 169.02
4216 NEW HORIZONS CLCm INC, HAZNTENANCE SUPPLIES 153111 1,685,00
6521 NEW LIFE INDUSTRIES RECREATION REFUNDS 153113 529°25
5301 NEW NEST SIGNAL MAINTENANCE 153113
32553 NICHOLAS, BEVERLY CLASS REFUND 153116 30.00
633 NIXON-EGLZ EQUIPNENT VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 153115
TlZ NORRIS-REPKEe INC. CONSULTING SERVICES # 153116 15e675.00
(<C 153117 - 153117
SZ3 OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE SUPPLIES # 153118 2eO53.&8
5702 ON WITH LEARNINGe INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 153119 le127.92
21663 OPRYLANO HOTEL RESERVATIONS 153120 561.72
21663 OPRYLAND HOTEL RESERVATIONS 153121 561.72
235 DWEN ELECTRIC MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 153122 15,955o31
1,61 PACIFIC BELL MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 1531Z3 5,930.23
3Z5&5 PACIFIC INN ~ HOTEL MEETING 153126 298.16
32565 PACIFIC INN E HOTEL MEETING 153125
32565 pACIFIC INN E HOTEL MEETING 153126 397°56
32565 PACIFIC INN ~ HOTEL MEETING 153127 696°95
6223 PAPER DIRECT, INto RECREATION SUPPLIES 153128 51,85
818 PARAGON BUILDING PRODUCTS INC. CONCRETE SUPPLIES 153129 116.81
5318 PARKERe SHANNON INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 153130
BTZO pERVO PAINT CO. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES e 153131 1,16Z.31
32556 PG & E ENERGT SERVICES BUSINESS LICENSE 153132 6.38
32555 PIERCE, WENDY RECREATION 153133. 15.00
32600 PINKNEYe PENNY RECREATION I 153136 51,00
6211 pIONEER-STANDARD ELECTRONICS RECREATION REFUND 153135 120.20
6168 PIEONe SHAUN CONTRACT SERVICES 153136 180.00
1069 POMONA VALLET KAWASAKI VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 153137 2e168o58
5177 PORT SUPPLY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 153138 56.13
6398 PREMIER PERSONNEL RECREATION REFUND t 153139 Z,092,91
2533 PRENTICE HALL OFFICE SUPPLIES 153160 50.35
2176 QUADRANT SYSTEMS, INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 153161 176.00
6569 QUINNe SHERLINE BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 153162 210.00
251 R 6 R AUTOMOTIVE VEHICLE MAINTeSUPPLIES&SERVICE 153163 211,12
6713 R C MARKETING CO. SUPPLIES 8 153166 le971.63
618 R M J GROUP SOIL TESTING SERVICES 153165
266 RALPHS GROCERT CORPANT RECREATION SUPPLIES I 1531A6 501o50
12551 RANCHO CUCAMAONGA EXPLORER POSTIS39 RECREATION REFUND 153167
70 RANtWO CUCAHONGA CHAMBER MEMBERSHIP MEETING 153168 30.00
5176 RANCHO CUCRMONGA FAMILY YMCA PROGRAM ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 153169 580.00
12550 RANCHD CUCAMONGA RESERVE UNIT !136 RECREATION REFUNO 153150 2,172.11
6058 RANCHO SCREEN PRINT & EMBROIDERY RECREATION REFUND 153151 90.51
5916 REXEL CALCON ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES I 153152
6601 RHINO LINING OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 153153 106o60
276 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT PRINTS 153156 158,18
11716 SALAZARI SAL REIM8 OF SUPPLIES 153155 250o00
216 SAN BERN CDUNTT MGNTHLT SERVICE 153156 29701.38
216 SAN BERN COUNTY MONTHLY SERVICE 153157 2e175.69
581 SAN BERN COUNTY CAL-ZD PROGRAM 153158 220.39
IZg8 SAN BERN COUNTY ASSESSOR'S OFFICE SUBSCRIPTION 153159 29696.00
CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
LIST OF WARRANTS
FOR PERZOO= 06-21-00 (99100)
RUN DATE: 06/21/00 PAGE: 5
iTEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR. ANT.
....................................................................................................... · .............
~r~ CHECKt OVERLAP
5338 SAN 8ERNARDZNOe CZTT OF TELETHON SUPPORT 153160
12552 SANCHEZf BEATRZZ RECREATION REFUND 153161
1105 SEAL FURNITURE C SVSTEMS ZNC. OFFICE SUPPLIES I 153162
6621 SEARCH SYSTEMSt INCa RECREATION REFUND 153163
12555 SEPULVEOA9 MARK RECREATION REFUND 153164
1829 SHARED TECH. FAIRCHILD TELECOM, ZNC TELEPHONE SERVXCES I53165
351 SiGN SHOP, THE NAZNT SUPPLIES 153166
6485 SIGNATURE AUTO COLLISION CENTER SUBSCRIPTEON # 153167
6229 SIMONTON ENTERPRISES RECREATION REFUND 153168
692 SIR SPEEDV OFFICE SUPPLIES I 153169
13IT SMART C FINAL OAT CAMP SUPPLIES I 153170
319 SO CALiF GAS COMPANY HONTHLT GAS BILLS # 153171
<<< 15317Z - 153180
1432 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON MONTHLT ELECTRIC BILLS t 153181
5491 SPEKt CHRISTOPHER CASH ADVANCE 153182
5031 STATE OF CALiFORNiA MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 153183
5281 STERZCTCLE, INCa SHARPS PROGRAM B 153186
12556 STDDOARDe BOBBIE RECREATION REFUND I 153185
6662 STUARTe ODRIS BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 153186
6133 SUNRISE FORD AUTO SERVICE t SUPPLIES t 253187
5685 SURE-SHRED DOCUMENT DESTRUCTION OOCUMENT SHREDDING # 353188
6411 SNEET'S CLEAN SWEEP RECREATION REFUND 153t89
836 TARGET SPECZALTV PRODUCTS MAZNT SUPPLIES t 153190
1151 TECHNIC OFFICE SUPPLIES 153191
1262 TELEQUESTIDNE EVALUATION TELECOMM EQUIPMENT 153192
3942 TERMiNZX INTERNATIONAL HONTHLT PEST CONTROL SERVICE # 153193
5999 THOMAS, GAZL SUPPLT REIMBURSEMENT 153196
12557 THOHPSONt 8LANCA RECREATION REFUND 153195
11966 THOMPSONe MIKE RECREATION REFUND ~53196
12553 TOBIN, ROBERT RECREATION REFUND 153197
454Z TV CHRIS MAENTENANCE REPAIRS 153198
4558 U S GUARDS Ca., ZNC. SECURITY GUARD SERVICE # 153199
6486 U.S. ARHOR CARP. RECREATION REFUND 153200
2958 UHPS ARE US ASSOCIATION UMP SERVICES I 153201
4788 UNDERGROUND SVC. ALERT OF SO. CALZF UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT 153202
3437 UNZFZRST UNIFORM SERVICE UNIFORN SERVICES # 153203
3912 UNIQUE CREATIONS RECREATION SUPPLIES I 153206
6726 UNZSOURCE CORPORATION MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 153205
1226 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE UPS SERVICE I 153206
3141 VAN TECH MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 153207
881 VANCE CORPORATION BASELINE ROAD WiDENiNG # 153208
12556 VANDERMEER, ZNGRZD RECREATION REFUND 153209
<(( 153210 - 153210
6661 VERZZON WIRELESS BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 8 153211
1103 VISTA PAINT MAZNT SUPPLIES 8 153212
5870 VLSTSTENS, ZNCo COMPUTER HARDWARE 153213
4002 NASTE MANAGENENT WASTE NANAGEMENT t 153214
213 WAX~Ee KLEEN-LZNE CORP MAXNT SUPPLIES I 153215
4405 BEST END INCA RECOGNITION CELEBRATION 153216
~ 212 WiLLDAN ASSOCIATES pROFESSIONAL SERVICES IS321T
(<¢ 153218 - 153218
)))
>))
)))
270°00
17.00
6e200.91
149842.60
80.00
18105.Z5
38588o22
169,95
311.18
175,42
29306,38
180.00
126.84
65.00
200.00
924.16
4lO,OO
3.100.00
265.00
10,000.00
16.25
12,00
30.00
90,00
139.00
70667.89
209500.00
662o02
261.62
80.81
526.99
75,785.76
106,30
1t560,00
19713.79
CZTV OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA
LZST OF NARRANTS
FOR PERXOD: 06-21-00 (99100)
RUN DATEr 06/ZX/OO PAGE~ 6
............ . ......................................................................
VENDOR NANE ZTEN DESCRZPTZON
~ CHECKI OVERLAP
509 XEROX CORPORATZON COPY NACHZNE $UPPL'IrES/SERVZCE
509 XEROX CORPORATZON COPY NACHINE SUppLXESISERVZCE 153ZZ0 Z86,%6
~ TOTAL 774~37&,Z8
THE C ITY OF
[~ANCfiO CUCAMONGA
Staff Report
DATE:
TO.'
FROM:
SUBJECT:
July 5, 2000
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, City Manager
Lawrence I. Temple, Administrative Services Director
Approval of Resolution No. To Adopt a
Understandin~l for all City Employee Groups
Memorandum of
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution No. which will enact a
Memorandum of Understanding for all City employee bargaining groups for the term of
a three year contract effective July 1,2000 through June 30, 2003.
Backqround:
Staff and the City's three employee bargaining groups - General, Maintenance and
Supervisory/Professional - have met and conferred and negotiated a three year labor
contract. The attached Memoranda of Understanding have been executed by the
representatives of the employee bargaining groups and are provided here for enactment
under the Resolution.
Respectfully submitted,
Lawrence I. Temple
Administrative Services Director
LIT:jel
Attachment
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA AUTHORIZING ENTRY INTO
MEMORANDA OF UNDERSTANDING WITH THE CITY'S
GENERAL EMPLOYEES, MAINTENANCE EMPLOYEES, AND
THE SUPERVISORY/PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYEES, MEET
AND CONFER GROUPS FOR FISCAL YEARS 2000/2001,
2001/2002, AND 2002/2003
WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga ( the "City" ) has met and conferred
with the three bargaining groups, namely, the General Employees, Maintenance
Employees, and the Supervisory/Professional Employees Meet and Confer Group, over
wages, hours and working conditions; and
WHEREAS, the City has reached agreement with the three above mentioned meet
and confer groups; and
WHEREAS, Memoranda of Understanding for Fiscal Years 2000/2001,
2001/2002 and 2002/2003 outlining the agreement between the City and each of the three
meet and confer groups are attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference to this
Resolution; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga does hereby approve entry into Memoranda of Understanding for
Fiscal Years 2000/2001, 2001/2002 and 2002/2003 with the City's three meet and confer
groups, General Employees, Maintenance Employees, and Supervisory/Professional
Employees.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 5th day of July, 2000.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
William J. Alexander, Mayor
Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk
MEMORANDUM OF tINDERSTANDING
WHEREAS, representatives of the City of Rancho Cucamonga ("the City") have met
and conferred with representatives of the General Employees, Maintenance Employees, and
Supervisory/Professional Employees ("Bargaining Groups") regarding wages, hours and other
terms and conditions of employment, and;
WHEREAS, the City and the Bargaining Groups have reached agreement on items
within the scope of Meet and Coffer, and;
WHEREAS, the City and the Bargaining Groups wish to enter into a Memorandum of
Understanding regarding the agreements of the Meet and Confer process;
NOW, THEREFORE, the Bargaining Group representing the Ge. neral Employees,
Maintenance Employees and Supervisory/Professional employees and the City of Rancho
Cucamonga do hereby agree as follows:
1. Evergreen Agreement
All terms and conditions of employment currently in effect and not changed by the
provisions of this Memorandum of Understanding will remain in effect through the term of
this contract.
2. Term of Contract
The term of this agreement is July 1, 2000 through June 30, 2003.
3. Cost ofLivin~ Adiustment (COLA)
The City agrees to provide a cost of living adjustment as follows:
Effective July 3, 2000 4.52%
Effective July 2, 2001 4.52%
Effective July 1, 2002 4.52%
4. Medical Insurance
The City agrees to increase its medical premium contribution for all full time employees
hired after July 1, 1994 as follows:
Effective July 1, 2000, the City will provide up to $372 per month.
Effective July 1, 2001, the City will provide up to $407 per month.
Effective July 1, 2002, the City will provide up to $457 per month.
-1-
/¢
The Bargaining Groups agree that credits for any amount not used during the year shall not
be applied as premium contributions for the succeeding years.
As has been done in the past, the City will continue to monitor medical benefit costs and seek
the lowest premiums and quality medical coverage. The City will communicate with the
employees and their representatives and discuss changes and cost impacts.
5. Retirement Health Benefits
Not later than July 15, 2000, the City shall establish a Retiree Medical Benefits Committee
("Committee") to study and evaluate the feasibility of retiree medical benefits utilizing a
"banking" approach to fund benefits. The "banking" approach would be based on accrued
vacation leave and/or accrued sick leave. The members of the Committee shall include
representatives of the three general employee groups, the Administrative Services Manager,
the Deputy City Manager, and other Administrative Services staff as designated by the
Administrative Services Director or City Manager. The Committee shall attempt to
formulate recommendations to the City Manager no later than December 31, 2000.
The City reserves the right to approve or reject the recommendation of the Committee.
6. Tuition Reimbursement
Effective July 1, 2000, the City agrees to increase tuition reimbursement from $250 to $750
per fiscal year for regular full time employees who meet the criteria outlined in the City's
tuition reimbursement policy.
7. PERS Level 4 Survivors Benefit
The City agrees to amend its CalPERs contract to include the Level 4 Survivors Benefit.
-2-
Signed this o'~-0~.~ day of June 2000.
For the City:
Ca~ORGE S. RIVERA
Administrative Services Manager
For the General Employees
Shelly Maddox
PAMELA EASTER
Deputy City Manager
C xh
For the Maintenance Employees
Brett Lance
For the Professional/Supervisory Employees
Paula Pachon
-3-
RA CHO CUCAMONGA
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
July 5, 2000
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lain, City Manager
Lawrence I. Temple, Administrative Services Director
Approval to Adopt a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, California, Rescinding Resolution No. 99-169 and
Implementing Salary and Benefits for Fiscal Year 2000/2001
Recommendation
The City Council adopt the attached Resolution which will enact the terms of the
Memorandum of Understanding which is to be conCurrently approved by the City
Council on July 5, 2000. In addition, the City Council rescind Resolution No. 99-169
which related to the prior fiscal year salary and benefit terms.
BackQround
Staff has met collectively with the City's three bargaining groups. Staff has successfully
concluded a Memorandum of Understand (MOU) which has been signed by all three
City bargaining groups and this is before the City Council for approval on July 5, 2000.
The attached Salary and Benefit Resolution implements the MOU with the City's
bargaining groups. The cost for enactment of the MOU's for Fiscal Year 2000-2001 is
contained within the 2000-2001 Fiscal Year Budget. The attached Salary and Benefit
Resolution is effective July 1, 2000.
Respectfully submitted,
Lawrence I. Temple
Administrative Services Director
/'7
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RESCINDING
RESOLUTION 99-169 IMPLEMENTING SALARY AND BENEFITS
FOR FISCAL YEAR 2000 - 2001
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has determined
that it is necessary for the efficient operation and management of the City that policies be
established prescribing salary ranges, benefits, and holidays and other policies for employees
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga recognizes that it
competes in a marketplace to obtain qualified personnel to perform and provide municipal
services, and that compensation and conditions of employment must be sufficiently attractive
to recruit and retain qualified employees,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, California, as follows:
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 5th day of July, 2000.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
William J. Alexander, Mayor
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk
I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California
do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the
City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City
Council held on the 5th day of July, 2000.
Executed this 5th day of July, 2000 in Rancho Cucamonga, California
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk
Resolution #
Page 2
SECTION 1: Salary Ranges
ASSIGNMENTS OF CLASSIFICATIONS TO PAY RANGES
(Monthly Amounts)
Minimum Control Point
Class Title Step Amount Step Amount
Account Clerk 368 2, 171 408 2,650
Account Technician 403 2,585 443 3,156
Accountanffi 449 3,252 489 3,970
Accounting Manager* 516 4,542 556 5,545
Accounts Payable Supervisor~ 433 3,002 473 3,665
Accounts Services Superviso~ 449 3,252 489 3,970
Administrative Secretary~ 412 2,704 452 3,301
Administrative Services Director+ 589 6,537 629 7,983
Administrative Services Manager* 544 5,223 584 6,376
Assistant City Manager+z 633 8,144 673 9,936
Assistant Engineer~ 478 3,758 518 4,588
Assistant Planner~ 466 3,540 506 4,321
Assistant RDA Analyst~ 445 3,188 485 3,891
Assistant to the City Manger* 534 4,969 574 6,066
Associate Engineer~ 508 4,364 548 5,328
Associate Park Planne~ 478 3,758 518 4,588
Associate Planne~ 485 3,891 525 4,751
Benefits Technician 382 2,328 422 2,842
Budget Analyst~ 485 3,891 525 4,751
Building Inspection Supervisor~ 487 3,930 527 4,798
Building InspectoF 447 3,220 487 3,930
Building &Safety Official+z 574 6,066 614 7,407
Business License Clerk 371 2,204 411 2,690
Business License Program Coordinator~ 416 2,758 456 3,367
Business License Technician 401 2,560 441 3,125
Buyer 433 3,002 473 3,665
City Engineer+ 594 6,702 634 8,184
City Manager 659 9,266 699 11,313
City Planner+z 586 6,440 626 7,864
Code Enforcement Officer 431 2,973 471 3,629
Code Enforcement Supervisor"~F 461 3,452 501 4,215
Community Dev Director+z 624 7,786 664 9,500
Community Services Director+ 579 6,219 619 7,594
Community Serv. Marketing Manager* 529 4,546 569 5,916
Community Services Officer 409 2,664 449 3,252
Community Services Technician 417 2,772 457 3,384
Deputy City Clerk~ 418 2,786 458 3,401
Deputy City Engineer* 563 5,742 603 7,011
Deputy City Manager+ 583 6,344 623 7,747
Emergency Preparedness Coordinato~ 484 3,853 523 4,704
Emergency Preparedness Specialist 426 2,899 466 3,540
Engineering Aide 418 2,786 458 3,401
Maximum
Step Amount
418 2,786
453 3,317
499 4,173
566 5,829
483 3,853
499 4,173
462 3,470
659 9,266
614 7,407
703 11,540
528 4,822
516 4,542
495 4,090
554 6,376
558 5,601
528 4,822
535 4,994
432 2,988
535 4,994
537 5,044
497 4,131
644 8,603
421 2,828
466 3,540
451 3,284
483 3,853
664 9,500
729 13,132
656 9,130
481 3,815
511 4,430
694 11,034
649 8,820
579 6,219
459 3,418
467 3,557
468 3,575
613 7,370
653 8,996
533 4,944
476 3,721
468 3,575
Resolution #
Page 3
Class Title
Engineering Technician
Equipment Operator2
Equipment Services Supervisor'~F
Executive Assistant*
Facilities Superintendent*
Facilities Supervison~
Finance Officer+
Finance Specialist
Fleet Supervisor"~F
GIS Analyst
GIS/Special District Superviso~
GIS Technician
Information Systems Analyst#
Information Systems Manager*
Information Systems Specialist
Integrated Waste Coordinator*
Inventory Specialist Equipment/Mat
Junior Buyer
Junior Engineer
Junior Engineering Aide
Landscape Designen~
Lead Maintenance Worker~
Librarian I#
Librarian I1#
Library Assistant I#
Library Assistant I1#
Library Clerk
Library Director+
Library Services Manager*
Maintenance Coordinator
Maintenance Supervisor~
Maintenance Worker 12
Maintenance Worker II2
Maintenance Worker~
Management Aide
Management Analyst 1#
Management Analyst I1#
Management Analyst Ill#
Mechanic2
Mechanic's Assistant2
Office Services Clerk
Office Specialist I
Office Specialist II
Park/Landscape Maintenance Supt
Personnel Services Coordinator~
Personnel Clerk
Plan Check Manager Building*
Plan Check Manger Fire*
Planning Commission Secretary#$
Planning Specialist
Planning Technician
Step
438
405
441
448
525
474
559
402
474
450
510
430
499
547
450
533
381
401
448
398
463
418
433
455
363
404
346
558
504
438
474
370
380
380
426
456
485
502
424
377
352
332
352
525
435
372
513
513
418
433
413
Amount
3,078
2,611
3,125
3,236
4,751
3,684
5,629
2,572
3,684
3,268
4,408
2,958
4,173
5,302
3,268
4,944
2,317
2,560
3,236
2,522
3,487
2,786
3,002
3,351
2,118
2,598
1,945
5,601
4,278
3,078
3,684
2,193
2,305
2,305
2,899
3,367
3,891
4,236
2,871
2,271
2,005
1,814
2,005
4,751
3,033
2,215
4,475
4,475
2,786
3,002
2,717
Step
478
445
481
488
565
514
599
442
514
490
550
470
539
587
490
573
421
441
488
438
503
458
473
495
403
444
386
598
544
478
514
410
420
420
466
496
525
542
464
417
392
372
392
565
475
412
553
553
458
473
453
Amount
3,758
3,188
3,815
3,950
5,800
4,497
6,871
3,140
4,497
3,990
5,382
3,611
5,094
6,472
3,990
6,036
2,828
3,125
3,950
3,078
4,257
3,401
3,665
4,090
2,585
3,172
2,375
6,837
5,223
3,758
4,497
2,677
2,814
2,814
3,540
4,111
4,751
5,171
3,505
2,772
2,447
2,215
2,447
5,800
3,702
2,704
5,463
5,463
3,401
3,665
3,317
Step
488
455
491
498
575
524
629
452
524
500
560
480
549
597
500
583
431
451
498
448
513
468
483
505
413
454
396
628
554
488
524
420
430
430
476
506
535
552
474
427
402
382
402
575
485
422
563
563
468
483
463
Amount
3,950
3,351
4,010
4,152
6,096
4,727
7,983
3,301
4,727
4,194
5,657
3,796
5,355
6,803
4,194
6,344
2,973
3,284
4,152
3,236
4,475
3,575
3,853
4,300
2,717
3,334
2,497
7,943
5,490
3,950
4,727
2,814
2,958
2,958
3,721
4,321
4,994
5,436
3,684
2,914
2,572
2,328
2,572
6,096
3,891
2,842
5,742
5,742
3,575
3,853
3,487
Resolution #
Page 4
Class Title
Plans Examine~
Police Clerk**
Principal Planner*
Public Services Technician I z
Public Services Technician II
Public Works Engineer.2
Public Works Inspector 12
Public Works Inspector II2
Public Works Inspectorll NPDES2
Public Works Maintenance Manager*
Purchasing Clerk
Purchasing Manager*
Receptionist
Records Clerk
Records Coordinator
Records Manager/City Clerk+
Recreation Coordinator
Recreation Supervisor I
Recreation Supervisor II
Recreation Supervsio~
Redevelopment Analyst~
Redevelopment Technician
Recreation Superintendent*z
Redevelopment Director+
Revenue Clerk
Risk Management Coordinato~
Secretary~
Senior Account Technician
Senior Accountant~
Senior Administrative Secretary~
Senior Building Inspector~
Senior Civil Engineer*
Senior Information Systems Analyst#
Senior Information Systems Specialist
Senior Librarian#
Senior Maintenance Worker2
Senior Park Planne~
Senior Planner*
Senior Plans Examiner~
Senior Redevelopment Analyst*
Senior Special Districts Technician
Signal & Lighting Coordinator2
Special Districts Technician
Stadium Events Manager*
Street/Storm Drain Maintenance Supt.2
Supervising Public Works Inspector~
Traffic Engineer*
Crossing Guard
Instructor/Guard I
Instructor/Guard II
Library Aide
Step
472
350
535
388
398
533
430
450
450
555
368
520
342
344
372
545
432
452
462
462
475
413
529
571
358
456
382
426
485
418
467
543
529
487
466
390
490
515
487
505
430
465
417
541
525
480
548
240
240
280
211
Amount
3,647
1,985
4,994
2,399
2,522
4,944
2,958
3,268
3,268
5,800
2,171
4,654
1,907
1,926
2,215
5,249
2,988
3,301
3,470
3,470
3,702
2,717
4,846
5,976
2,065
3,367
2,328
2,899
3,891
2,786
3,557
5,197
4,846
3,930
3,540
2,423
3,990
4,520
3,930
4,300
2,958
3,522
2,772
5,145
4,751
3,796
5,328
6.62
6.62
8.08
6.02
Step
512
390
575
428
438
573
470
490
490
595
408
560
382
384
412
585
472
492
502
502
515
453
569
611
398
496
422
466
525
458
507
583
569
527
506
430
530
555
527
545
470
505
457
581
565
520
588
280
280
320
251
Amount
4,452
2,423
6,096
2,929
3,078
6,036
3,611
3,990
3,990
6,736
2,650
5,657
2,328
2,351
2,704
6,408
3,647
4,030
4,236
4,236
4,520
3,317
5,916
7,296
2,522
4,111
2,842
3,540
4,751
3,401
4,343
63,44
5,916
4,798
4,321
2,958
4,871
5,517
4,798
5,249
3,611
4,300
3,384
6,281
5,800
4,634
6,505
8.08
8.08
9.86
6.99
Step
522
400
585
438
448
583
480
500
500
605
418
570
392
394
422
615
482
502
512
512
525'
463
579
641
408
506
432
476
535
468
517
593
579
537
516
440
540
565
537
555
480
515
467
591
575
530
598
290
290
330
261
Amount
4,680
2,547
6,408
3,078
3,236
6,344
3,796
4,194
4, 194
7,081
2,786
5,946
2,447
2,472
2,842
7,444
3,834
4,236
4,452
4,452
4,751
3,487
6,219
8,475
2,650
4,321
2,988
3,721
4,994
3,575
4,565
6,669
6,219
5,044
4,542
3,109
5,120
5,800
5,044
5,517
3,796
4,520
3,557
6,603
6,096
4,871
6,837
8.49
8.49
10.36
7.35
Resolution #
Page 5
Class Title Step Amount Step Amount Step Amount
Library Assistant I 362 12.16 402 14.84 412 15.60
Library Assistant II 404 14.99 ~,~,~, 18.30 454 19.23
Admin. Intem 320 9.86 360 12.03 370 12.65
Assistant Pool Manager 305 9.15 345 11.17 355 11.74
Library Clerk 346 11.22 386 13.70 396 14.40
Library Page 231 6.32 271 7.72 281 8.12
Library Page II 280 8.08 320 9.86 330 10.36
Maintenance Technician2 280 8.08 320 9.86 330 10.36
Planning Aide 320 9.86 360 12.04 370 12.65
Pool Manager 329 10.31 369 12.59 379 13.23
Program Specialist 311 9.43 351 11.51 361 12.10
Receptionist 342 11.00 382 13.43 392 14.12
Records Clerk 344 11.11 384 13.57 394 14.26
Recreation Attendant 237 6.52 277 7.96 287 8.36
Recreation Assistant 266 7.53 306 9.19 316 9.66
Recreation Leader 290 8.49 330 10.36 340 10.89
**This classification when assigned to shifts other than day shift shall have additional pay of 40 cent,,
per hour.
~ When acting as Clerk to Commissions $50 paid per night or weekend day meeting. Compensatory
time off can be substituted in lieu of $50 at the option of the employee.
2 Up to $150 provided annually toward purchase of approved safety footwear from a city designated
vendor,
$ Denotes the $50 paid per night or weekend day meeting discontinues when this position is
vacated as long as this position is classified supervisory/professional.
Denotes classes "Z" rated i.e. incumbent has opportunity to move forward based on satisfactory
performance with evaluations. Whenever the position is vacated, Personnel will conduct a salary
survey and move the salary range to market.
# Denotes Supervisory/Professional Class
* Denotes Management Class
+ Denotes Executive Class
~ANCHO CUCAHONC, A
Memorandum
DA'I~:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
July 5, 2000
Mayor and City Council Member
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager r/~/~-~
Lawrence I. Temple, Administrative Services Directo
Error Correction, Council Agenda Item D 4
The Salary Resolution being submitted for council action contains a typographical error
under Section 3-A. Administrative Leave should read as 100 hours instead of 1,000
hours.
Thank you for your attention.
Resolution #
Page 6
Executive Management employees will be assigned to salary ranges which are no less than
20% (40 salary code steps) below the control point and no more than 15% (30 salary code
steps) above the control point. All other employees will be assigned to salary ranges which
are no less than 20% (40 salary code steps) below the control point and no more than 5% (10
salary code steps) above the control point. Actual salary within the range is determined by
performance, achievement of goals and objectives, or for recent appointments, growth within
the position.
SECTION 3: Three Tiered Manaqement Proqram
Employees designated as either Professional/Supervisory, Management, or Executive
Management are not eligible for overtime pay, or compensatory time for working hours over
and above the normal daily work schedule. Employees so designated shall be entitled to all
benefits provided to general employees and the following:
Supervisory/Professional
A. Administrative leave to a maximum of 50 hours per fiscal year. Days off
must be approved by appropriate supervisor, after successful completion of
six months service within this classification.
B. Life insurance policy of an additional $20,000.
C. Deferred compensation program of 2% of salary.
Manaqement
A. Administrative leave to a maximum of 75 hours per fiscal year. Days off
must be approved by appropriate supervisor, after successful completion of
six months service within this classification.
B. Life insurance policy of an additional $20,000.
C. Deferred compensation program of 4% of salary.
Executive Manaqement
SECTION 4:
A. Administrative leave to a maximum of 100 hours per fiscal year. Days off
must be approved by appropriate supervisor, after successful completion of
six months service within this classification.
B. Live insurance policy of an additional $30,000.
C. Automobile allowance of $400 3er month if a City vehicle is not provided.
Life Insurance
The City provides $30,000 base coverage of life tnsurence for all employees. Employees who
want to purchase additional life insurance coverage with personal funds may do so at the
City's group rate.
SECTION 5: Health Insurance
The City provides health insurance plans available to all full time continuous salaried
employees and elected officials. The City agrees to average the cost of reed ical insurance for
Resolution #
Page 6
Executive Management employees will be assigned to salary ranges which are no less than
20% (40 salary code steps) below the control point and no more than 15% (30 salary code
steps) above the control point. All other employees will be assigned to salary ranges which
are no less than 20% (40 salary code steps) below the control point and no more than 5% (10
salary code steps) above the control point. Actual salary within the range is determined by
performance, achievement of goals and objectives, or for recent appointments, growth within
the position.
SECTION 3: Three Tiered Management Program
Employees designated as either Professional/Supervisory, Management, or Executive
Management are not eligible for overtime pay, or compensatory time for working hours over
and above the normal daily work schedule. Employees so designated shall be entitled to all
benefits provided to general employees and the following:
Supervisorv/Professional
A. Administrative leave to a maximum of 50 hours per fiscal year. Days off
must be approved by appropriate supervisor, after successful completion of
six months service within this classification.
B. Life insurance policy of an additional $20,000.
C. Deferred compensation program of 2% of salary.
Manaqement
A. Administrative leave to a maximum of 75 hours per fiscal year. Days off
must be approved by appropriate supervisor, after successful completion of
six months service within this classification.
B. Life insurance policy of an additional $20,000.
C. Deferred compensation program of 4% of salary.
Executive Manaqement
A. Administrative leave to a maximum of 1000 hours per fiscal year. Days off
must be appreved by appropriate supervisor, after successful completion of
six months service within this classification.
B. Live insurance policy of an additional $30,000.
C. Automobile allowance of $400 per month if a City vehicle is not provided.
SECTION 4: Life Insurance
The City provides $30,000 base coverage of life insurance for all employees. Employees who
want to purchase additional life insurance coverage with personal funds may do so at the
City's group rate.
SECTION 5: Health Insurance
The City provides health insurance plans available to all full time continuous salaried
employees and elected officials. The City agrees to average the cost of medical insurance
Resolution #
Page 7
for all current employees as one group, providing for no additional payment by employees for
coverage through June 30, 2003. The City will provide the following amounts for premium
payments for all full time employees hired after July 1, 1994.
A. Up to $372 per month effective 7/1/00
B. Up to $407 per month effective 7/1/01
C. Up to $457 per month effective 7/1/02
For Executive Management employees hired after July 1, 1994, the City shall pay up to $337
a month for medical insurance.
SECTION 6: Retiree Medical
Employees who retire at the age of 55 or above with ten years of service with the City of
Rancho Cucamonga can pay for medical insurance at a group rate through the City until 18
months prior to the age of 65 at which time they can convert to Cobra.
SECTION 7: Dental Insurance
The City shall provide a dental insurance plan for all full-time continuous salaried employees
and elected officials. The City agrees to average the cost of dental insurance for all full time
continuous salaried employees and elected officials through June 30, 2000.
SECTION 8: Optical Insurance
The City shall provide an optical insurance plan for all full-time continuous salaried employees
and elected officials. The City agrees to average the cost of optical insurance for all full time
continuous salaried employees and elected officials through June 30, 2000.
SECTION 9: Bereavement Leave
When a death occurs in the family of a full time employee, the employee shall be granted up
to five (5) bereavement leave days with pay. A death certificate or other acceptable evidence
may be required by the department head before leave is allowed. Family members are
defined as follows: employee's spouse, employee's parents, employee's grandparents,
employee's children, employee's siblings, or employee's grandchildren, employee's spouse's
parents, employee's spouse's grandparents, employee's spouse's siblings, employee's
spouse's children, employee's spouses grandchildren, or a blood relative residing with
employee. The department head and the City Manager shall approve such bereavement
leave.
SECTION 10: Personal Leave
Employees can use up to 20 hours of accrued sick leave, vacation, administrative leave or
holiday time as personal leave. This 20 hours can be used incrementally (i.e., 1 hour, 1/2
hour) throughout the fiscal year. Use of this time is for situations requiring the employee's
attention and needs to be cleared with their supervisor when using this time. Personal leave
can be taken after six months service.
Resolution #
Page 8
SECTION 11: Vacation
All full-time employees shall, with continuous service, accrue working hours of vacation
monthly according to the following schedule. Vacation can be taken after six months service.
Length of Service
in Years
Hours Accrued
Per Pay Period
Annual Hours
Accrued
1 3.077 80
2 3.461 90
3 3.846 100
4 4.230 110
5 4.615 120
6-8 5.000 130
9 5.384 140
10 5.769 150
11-13 6.153 160
14 6.538 170
15+ 6.923 180
SECTION 12: Vacation buvback
City to provide the cash value of 40 hours of vacation leave annually in November.
Employees must maintain a minimum of 80 hours of accrued vacation subsequent to any
payment of vacation buy back time. Employees who wish to buy back vacation must request
payment of not more than or less than 40 hours.
SECTION 13: Sick Leave
All full-time employees shall, with continuous service, accrue 120 hours of sick leave annually.
Sick leave can be taken after six months service.
SECTION 14: Sick Leave Buvback
Employees who terminate their city employment after 5 years of continuous service and have
at least 50% of five years' sick leave accrued on the books upon termination can sell 120
hours back to the City.
SECTION 15: Holidays
The City Offices shall observe the following 14 holidays. All full time continuous salaried
employees shall be compensated at their regular rate for these days.
(1) July 4, 2000 -Independence Day
(2) September 4, 2000- Labor Day
(3) November 9, 2000- Veteran's Day
(4) November 23, 2000- Thanksgiving Day
(5) November 24, 2000 - Day following Thanksgiving (floater)
(6) December 24, 2000 - The day preceding Christmas (floater)
(7) December 25, 2000 - Christmas Day
(8) January 1, 2001 - New Years
Resolution #
Page 9
(9) January 15, 2001 - Martin Luther King's Birthday
(10) February 19, 2001 - President's Day
(11) May 28, 2001 - Memorial Day
(12) Three discretionary days may be taken by an employee at his/her
convenience after six months service subject to approval of the
department head. Days may not be carried over from one fiscal year to
the next,
Whenever a holiday falls on a Sunday, the following Monday shall be observed as a holiday.
Whenever a holiday falls on a Fdday or Saturday, the preceding Thursday shall be observed
as the holiday. When a holiday combination occurs (Thanksgiving, Christmas, etc) where two
consecutive days are holidays and it would result in the City Hall being open to serve the
public only 2 days during the week, only one of the holidays will be observed and the other
holiday will become a floating holiday. For example, for Thanksgiving, Thursday will be
observed as the regular holiday, however Friday will become a floating holiday to be used at
a later date. For Christmas, Wednesday will be observed as the regular holiday, however
Tuesday (the day preceding Christmas) will become a floating holiday to be used at a later
date. In the instance of Thanksgiving, Christmas, or New Years, employees will have until
June 30 to use those floating holidays accrued between Thanksgiving and New Years. Also,
those days will not accrue as floating holidays until the actual holiday has occurred. Each
year the City will designate which days will be observed and which are floating holidays.
Employees who are eligible to bank a holiday have until June 30 (end of fiscal year) to use
the banked holiday earned from July 1 through April 30. Any holiday banked in May and
June, employees have until September 30 to use the banked holiday.
SECTION 16: Holiday Time
The City agrees that employees who are assigned to work on a holiday, whether or not their
regular shift assignment requires they work that day, are eligible for pay at time and one-half
for working that day. This time and one-half may be taken as compensation or put in a
compensatory time off bank, (in effect, compensating at double time and one-hal0. That rate
of compensation is tallied as follows: the ten hours compensation for the holiday, plus
compensation at time and one-half for the hours actually worked. This payment at time and
one-half abrogates the employees right to that holiday.
SECTION 17: Premium Holiday Compensation
Maintenance employees required as part of the regular work assignment to work on
Christmas Day, New Years Day, Independence Day or Thanksgiving Day, are allowed to
observe the holiday on another day. Additionally, these employees who work on the
aforementioned designated holidays may select to receive compensation on that holiday at
time and one-half for the ten hour shift, or take a second holiday as time off at a later date.
SECTION 18: Natal and Adoption Leave without Pay
Employees are granted up to four months natal and adoption leave for the birth or adoption
of a child. Employees on this leave of absence without pay will be responsible for the
payment of medical, dental and optical premiums to keep the coverage in force during the
leave of absence.
SECTION 19: Natal and Adoption Leave with Pav
Resolution #
Page 10
Employees are granted up to 2 days natal and adoption leave with pay for the birth or
adoption of a child. Any paid time required beyond this initial 2 days must be charged to sick
leave, vacation, compensatory or floating holiday time.
SECTION 20: Military Leave
Employees required to serve military leave will be compensated pursuant to the Military and
Veterans Code. To qualify for compensation the military orders must be submitted to the
supervisor prior to their tour of duty and must be attached to the timecard for that pay period.
SECTION 21: Military Service Buy Back
Employees have the option for military service buy back at the employee's expense.
SECTION 22: Overtime - Maintenance
The City agrees that employees who are sent home to rest and to be available to work
additional hours as a result of a storm or impending emergency situation and are not
subsequently recalled to work, will be compensated for the hours not worked in that shift, due
to them having been sent home, to bring the total hours to 10 worked in that shift.
Employees who are subsequently recalled to work the storm or emergency situation will work
no more than 12 consecutive hours. Any hours worked in excess of 10 in that 12 hour shift
will be paid at time and one-half, regardless of the total numbers of compensated hours for
that work week.
SECTION 23: Standby Pav
Employees required to be on standby shall be compensated at the rate of $150 per week.
SECTION 24: Safety Footwear
The City will provide up to $150 annually toward the purchase of safety footwear at a city
designated vendor for employees required to wear safety footwear as part of their job
responsibilities.
SECTION 25: 2% ~ 55
City to provide the employees contribution for 2% @ 55 years PERS retirement benefit.
SECTION 26: Tuition Reimbursement
A. City shall provide all regular full time employees for tuition reimbursement who meet
criteria outlined in tuition reimbursement policy up to a maximum of $750 per person per
fiscal year.
B. The amount of tuition reimbursement for Executive Management employees shall be $250
per person per fiscal year, provided they meet the criteria outlined in tuition
reimbursement policy.
Resolution #
Page 11
SECTION 27:4/10 Work Week
The City will operate on a 4/10 work week, hours 7 am to 6 pm, Monday through Thursday.
SECTION 28: Carpool Banked Hours
Employees who are eligible to bank 1/2 hour carpool time have until June 30 (end of fiscal
year) to use the banked hours earned from July 1 through April 30. Any carpool hours
banked in May and June, employees have until September 30 to use the banked time.
SECTION 28: Bi-Linclual Pay
Employees who quality for bi-lingual pay will be provided at $50 per month.
SECTION 29:
The City Manager's contract #89-037 is renewed for fiscal year 2000 - 2001.
SECTION 30:
City Council members have the option to join PERS; members contribution to be paid by
councilmember. City Council members are eligible for a $400 per month car allowance; the
mayor for $550 per month,
SECTION 31: Confidential EmDIoVees
Confidential employees are designated as such when an employee in the course of his or her
duties, has access to information relating to the City's administration of employer-employee
relations. Employees designated as confidential employees may not act as representatives
of employee organizations which represent other employees of the City. The employees
designated as confidential employees are as follows:
Personnel Services Coordinator
Personnel Clerk
Benefits Technician
Account Technician - Payroll
Office Specialist II- Admin Svc
Secretary
Planning Commission Secretary
Administrative Secretary
Senior Administrative Secretary
Risk Management Coordinator
Deputy City Clerk
Records Clerk
Records Manager/City Clerk
Records Coordinator
SECTION 32:
The provisions of this resolution are effective July 1, 2000.
Page 12
SCHEDULE I - SALARY CODE TABLE
BASIC Pay SCHEDULE IN HOURLY, BI-WEEKLY AND MONTHLY AMOUNTS
ONE HALF PERCENT BETWEEN RANGES
MONTHLY AMOUNTS ROUNDED TO NEAREST DOLLAR
Hourly
Rancle # Rate
Bi-Weekly Monthly Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly
Rate Rate Ranfie # Rate Rate Rate
211. 5.7244
212. 5.7530
213. 5.7818
214. 5.8107
215. 5.8398
216. 5.8690
217. 5.8983
218. 5.9278
219. 5.9574
220. 5.9872
221. 6.0172
222. 6.0472
223. 6.0775
224. 6.1079
225. 6.1384
226. 6.1691
227. 6.1999
228. 6.2309
229. 6.2521
230. 6.2934
231. 6.3249
232. 6.3565
233. 6.3883
234. 6.4202
235. 6.4523
236. 6.4846
237. 6.5170
238. 6.5496
239. 6.5823
240. 6.6153
241. 6.6483
242. 6.6816
243. 6.7150
244. 6.7486
245. 6.7823
246. 6.8162
247. 6.8503
248. 6.8845
249. 6.9190
250. 6.9536
457.9527 992 251. 6.9883 559.0660 1211
460.2424 997 252. 7.0233 561.8613 1217
462.5436 1002 253. 7.0584 564.6706 1223
464.8564 1007 254. 7.0937 567.4940 1230
467.1806 1012 255. 7.1291 570.3314 1236
469.5165 1017 256. 7.1648 573.1831 1242
471.8641 1022 257. 7.2006 576.0490 1248
474.2234 1027 258. 7.2366 578.9292 1254
476.5946 1033 259. 7.2728 581.8239 1261
478.9775 1038 260. 7.3092 584.7330 1267
481.3724 1043 261. 7.3457 587.6567 1273
483.7793 1048 262. 7.3824 590.5950 1280
486.1982 1053 263. 7.4193 593.5479 1286
488.6292 1059 264. 7.4564 596.5157 1292
491.0723 1064 265. 7.4937 599.4982 1299
493.5277 1069 266. 7.5312 602.4957 1305
495.9953 1075 267. 7.5689 605.5082 1312
498.4753 1080 268. 7.6067 608.5358 1318
500.9677 1085 269. 7.6447 611.5764 1325
503.4725 1091 270 7.6830 614.6363 1332
505.9899 1096 271. 7.7214 617.7095 1338
508.5198 1102 272. 7.7600 620.7981 1345
511.0624 1107 273. 7.7988 623.9021 1352
513.6177 1113 274. 7.8378 626.0216 1359
516.1858 1118 275. 7.8770 630.1567 1365
518.7667 1124 276. 7.9163 633.3075 1372
521.3606 1130 277. 7.9559 636.4740 1379
523.9674 1135 278. 7.9957 639.6564 1386
526.5872 1141 279. 8.0357 642.8546 1393
529.2202 1147 280. 8.0759 645.0689 1400
531.8663 1152 281. 8.1162 648.2993 1407
534.5256 1158 282. 8.1568 652.5458 1414
537.1982 1164 283. 8.1976 655.8085 1421
539.8842 1170 284. 8.2386 659.0875 1428
542.5836 1176 285. 8.2798 662.3830 1435
545.2965 1181 286. 8.3212 665.6949 1442
548.0230 1187 287. 8.3628 669.0234 1450
550.7631 1193 288. 8.4046 672.3685 1457
553.5170 1199 289. 8.4466 675.7303 1464
556.2845 1205 290. 8.4889 679.1090 1471
Page 13
Hourly
RanQe # Rate
291. 8.5313
292. 8.5740
293. 8.6168
294. 8.6599
295, 8.7032
296. 8.7467
297. 8.7905
298, 8,8344
299, 8.8786
300. 8.9230
301 8.9676
302. 9.0124
303. 9.0575
304. 9.1028
305. 9.1483
306. 9.1940
307. 9,2400
308. 9.2862
309. 9.3326
310. 9.3793
311. 9.4262
312. 9.4733
313, 9.5207
314. 9.5683
315. 9.6161
316, 9,6642
317. 9,7125
318, 9.7611
319, 9.8099
320. 9.8590
321. 9.9083
322. 9.9578
323. 10,0076
324. 10.0576
325. 10.1079
326, 10.1585
327. 10,2092
328. 10.2603
329. 10.3116
330. 10.3632
331. 10,4150
332. 10.4670
333. 10.5194
334. 10,5720
335. 10.6248
336. 10.6780
337. 10.7314
338. 10.7850
339. 10.8389
340. 10,8931
Bi-Weekly
Rate
682.5045
685.9170
689.3466
692.7933
696.2573
699.7386
703,2373
706,7535
710.2872
713.8387
717.4079
720.9949
724.5999
728.2229
731.8640
735.5233
739.2009
742,8969
746.6114
750.3445
754.0962
757.8667
761,6560
765.4643
769.2916
773.1381
777.0038
780.8888
784.7932
788.7172
792.6608
796.6241
800,6072
804.6103
808.6333
812.6765
816.7399
820.8236
824,9277
829.0523
833.1976
837.3636
841.5504
845.7581
849.9869
864.2369
858.5080
862.8006
867.1146
871.4502
Monthly
Rate
1479
1486
1494
1501
1509
1516
1524
1531
1539
1547
1554
1562
1570
1578
1586
1594
1602
1610
1618
1626
1634
1642
1650
1659
1667
1675
1684
1692
1700
1709
1717
1726
1735
1743
1752
1761
1770
1778
1787
1796
1805
1814
1823
1832
1842
1851
1860
1869
1879
1888
Ranqe #
341.
342.
343.
344.
345.
346.
347.
348.
349.
350.
351.
352,
353.
354.
355.
356.
357.
358,
359.
360.
361.
362.
363.
364.
365,
366.
367.
368.
369.
370.
371.
372,
373.
374.
375.
376.
377.
378.
379.
380.
381.
382.
383.
384.
385.
386.
387.
388.
389.
390.
Hourly
Rate
10.9476
11.0023
11.0573
11.1126
11.1682
11.2240
11,2802
11.3366
11.3932
11.4502
11.5075
11,5650
11.6228
11.6809
11.7393
11.7980
11,8570
11.9163
11.9759
12.0358
12.0959
12.1564
12.2172
12.2783
12.3397
12.4014
12.4634
12.5257
12.5883
12.6513
12.7145
12.7781
12.6420
12.9062
12.9707
13.0356
13.1008
13,1663
13.2321
13.2983
13.3648
13.4316
13.4987
13.5662
13.6341
13.7022
13.7707
13.8396
13.9088
13.9783
Bi-Weekly
Rate
875,8074
880,1864
884.5874
889.0103
893.4554
897.9226
902.4123
906.9243
911.4589
916.0162
920.5963
925.1993
929.8253
934.4744
939,1468
943.6425
948,5617
953,3045
958.0711
962.8614
967.6757
972.5141
977.3767
982,2636
987.1749
992,1108
997.0713
1002.0567
1007.0669
1012.1023
1017,1628
1022.2486
1027.3598
1032.4966
1037.6591
1042.8474
1048,0617
1053.3020
1058.5685
1063.8613
1069.1806
1074.5265
1079.8992
1085.2987
1090,7252
1096,1788
1101.6597
1107.1680
1112.7038
1118.2673
Monthly
Rate
1898
1907
1917
1926
1936
1045
1955
1965
1975
1985
1995
2005
2015
2025
2O35
2045
2O55
2065
2076
2086
2097
2107
2118
2128
2139
2150
2160
2171
2182
2193
2204
2215
2226
2237
2248
2260
2271
2282
2294
2305
2317
2328
2340
2351
2363
2375
2387
2399
2411
2423
Page 14
Ranqe
391,
392.
393,
394.
395.
396.
397.
398.
399.
400.
401.
402.
403.
404.
405.
406.
407.
408.
409.
410.
411.
412.
413.
414.
415.
416.
417.
418.
419.
420.
421.
422.
423.
424.
425.
426.
427.
428.
429.
430.
431.
432.
433.
434.
435.
436.
437.
438.
439.
440.
Hourly
# Rate
14.0482
14.1185
14.1891
14.260
14.3313
14.4030
14.4750
14.5474
14.6201
14.6932
14.7667
14.8405
14.9147
14.9893
15.0642
15.1395
15.2152
15.2913
15.3678
15.4446
15.5218
15.5994
15.6774
15.7558
15.8346
15.9138
15.9933
16.0733
16.1537
16.2344
16.3156
16.3972
16.4792
16.5616
16.6444
16.7276
16.8112
16.8953
16.9798
17.0647
17.1500
17.2358
17.3219
17.4085
17.4956
17.5831
17.6710
17.7593
17.8481
17.9374
Bi-Weekly
Rate
1123.8587
1129.4780
1135.1254
1140.8010
1146.5050
1152.2375
1157.9987
1163.7887
1169.6076
1175,4557
1181.3329
1187.2396
1193.1758
1199.1417
1205.1374
1211.1631
1217.2189
1223.3050
1229.4215
1235.5686
1241.7465
1247.9552
1254.1950
1260.4660
1266.7683
1273.1021
1279.4676
1285.8650
1292.2943
1298.7558
1305.2496
1311.7758
1318.3347
1324.9264
1331.5510
1338.2087
1344.8998
1351.6243
1358.3824
1365.1743
1372.0002
1378.8602
1385.7545
1392.6833
1399.5467
1406.6449
1413.6781
1420.7465
1427.8503
1434.9895
Monthly
Rate
2435
2447
2459
2472
2484
2497
2509
2522
2534
2547
2560
2572
2585
2598
2611
2624
2637
2650
2664
2677
2690
2704
2717
2731
2745
2758
2772
2786
2800
2814
2828
2842
2856
2871
2885
2899
2914
2929
2943
2958
2973
2988
3002
3017
3033
3048
3063
3078
3094
3109
Range #
441.
442.
443.
444.
445.
446.
447.
448.
449.
450.
451.
452.
453.
454.
455.
456.
457.
458.
459.
46O.
461.
462.
463.
464.
465.
466.
467.
468.
469.
470.
471.
472.
473.
474.
475.
476.
477.
478.
479.
486.
481.
482.
483.
484.
485.
486.
487.
488.
489.
490.
Hourly
Rate
18.0271
18.1172
18.2078
18.2988
18.3903
18.4823
18.5747
18.6577
18.7609
18.8547
18.9490
19.0437
19.1389
19.2346
19.3308
19.4274
19.5246
19.6222
19.7203
19.8189
19.9180
20.0176
20.1177
20.2183
20.3194
20.4210
20.5231
20.6257
20.7288
20.8325
20.9366
21.0413
21.1465
21.2522
21.3585
21.4653
21.5726
21.6805
21.7889
21.8978
22.0073
22.1174
22.2279
22.3391
22.4508
22.5630
22.6759
22.7892
22.9032
23.0177
Bi-Weekly
Rate
1442.1645
1449.3753
1456.6222
1463.9053
1471.2248
1478.5809
1485.9738
1493.4037
1500.8707
1508.3751
1515.9169
1523.4965
1531.1140
1538.7696
1546.4634
1554.1957
1561.9667
1569.7766
1577.6254
1585.5136
1593.4411
1601.4083
1609.4154
1617.4625
1625.5498
1633.6775
1641.8459
1650.0551
1658.3054
1666.5969
1674.9299
1683.3046
1691.7211
1700.1797
1708.6806
1717.2240
1725.8101
1734.4392
1743.1114
1751.8269
1760.5861
1769.3890
1778.2359
1787.1271
1796.0627
1805.0431
1814.0683
1823.1386
1832.2543
1841.4156
Monthly
Rate
3125
3140
3156
3172
3188
32O4
3220
3236
3252
3268
3284
3301
3317
3334
3351
3367
3364
3401
3418
3435
3452
3470
3487
3505
3522
3540
3557
3575
3593
3611
3629
3647
3665
3684
3702
3721
3739
3758
3777
3796
3815
3834
3853
3872
3891
3911
3930
3950
3970
3990~(~_,.~
Page 15
Hourly
Ranqe # Rate
491. 23.1328
492. 23.2484
493. 23.3647
494. 23.4815
495. 23,5989
496. 23.7169
497. 23.8355
498. 23.9547
499, 24.0745
500. 24.1948
501. 24.3158
502. 24,4374
503. 24.5596
504. 24.6824
505. 24.8058
506. 24.9398
507. 25,0545
508, 25,1797
509. 25.3056
510. 25.4321
511, 25.5593
512, 25.6871
513. 25.8155
514. 25.9446
515. 26.0743
516, 26.2047
517. 26,3357
518, 26,4674
519. 26.5998
520, 26.7328
521. 26.8664
522. 27.0007
523. 27,1358
524. 27.2714
525. 27.4078
526, 27.5448
527. 27.6826
528, 27.8210
529. 27,9601
530. 28.0999
531. 28,2404
532, 28.3816
533, 28.5235
534. 28.6661
535, 28.8094
536. 28,9535
537. 29.0982
538, 29,2437
539, 29,3900
640. 29.5369
Bi-Weekly
Rate
1850.6227
1859.8758
1869.1752
1878.5210
1887.9136
1897.3532
1906.8400
1916,3742
1925,9560
1935.5858
1945.2637
1954.9901
1964.7650
1974.5888
1984,4618
1994.3841
2004.3560
2014.3778
2024.4497
2034.5719
2044.7448
2054.9685
2065.2434
2075.5696
2085.9474
2096.3772
2106.8590
2117.3933
2127.9803
2138.6202
2149.3133
2160.0599
2170.8602
2181,7145
2192.6230
2203.5862
2214.6041
2225.6771
2236.8055
2247.9895
2259.2295
2270.5256
2281.8783
2293.2876
2304,7541
2316.2779
2327.8592
2339.4985
2351.1960
2362.9520
Monthly
Rate
4010
4030
4050
4070
4090
4111
4131
4152
4173
4194
4215
4236
4257
4278
43O0
4321
4343
4364
4386
4408
4430
4452
4475
4497
4520
4542
4565
4588
4611
4634
4657
4680
4704
4727
4751
4774
4798
4822
4846
4871
4895
4919
4944
4969
4994
5019
5044
5069
5094
5120
Ranqe #
541.
542.
643.
544.
545.
546.
547.
548.
549.
550.
551.
552,
553,
554,
555.
556.
557.
558,
559.
560,
561.
562.
563.
564.
565.
566.
567.
568.
569.
570.
571.
572.
573.
574.
575.
576.
577.
578.
579.
580.
581.
582.
583.
584.
585.
586.
587,
588,
589.
590,
Hourly
Rate
29.6846
29.8330
29.9822
30.1321
30.2827
30.4342
30,5863
30.7393
30.8930
31.0474
31.2027
31.3587
31.5155
31.6730
31.8314
31.9906
32.1505
32.3113
32.4728
32.6352
32.7984
32.9624
33,1272
33.2938
33.4593
33.6266
33,7947
33.9637
34.1335
34.3042
34.4757
34.6481
34.8213
34.9954
35.1704
35.3462
35.5230
35.7006
35.8791
36.0585
36.2388
36.4200
36.6021
36.7851
36.9690
37,1538
37.3396
37,5263
37.7139
37,9025
Bi-Weekly
Rate
2374.7668
2386.6406
2398.5738
2410.5667
2422.6195
2434.7326
2446.9063
2459.1408
2471.4365
2483.7937
2496.2127
2508.6937
2521.2372
2533.8434
2546.5126
2559.2452
2572.0414
2584.9016
2597.8261
2610.8152
2623.8693
2626.9886
2650.1736
2663,4245
2676.7416
2690,1253
2703.5759
2717,0938
2730.6793
2744.3327
2758.0543
2771.6446
2785.7038
2799.6323
2813.6305
2827.6987
2841.8371
2856.0463
2870.3266
2884.6782
2899.1016
2913.5971
2928,1651
2942,8059
2957.5199
2972.3075
2987.1691
3002.1049
3017.1154
3032.2010
Monthly
Rate
5145
5171
5197
5223
5249
5275
5302
5328
5355
5382
5408
5436
5463
6490
5517
5545
5573
5601
5629
5657
5685
5713
5742
5771
5800
5829
5858
5887
5916
5946
5976
6006
6036
6066
6O96
6127
6157
6188
6219
6250
6281
6313
6344
6376
6408
6440
6472
6505
6537
Page 16
Ranqe
591.
592.
593.
594.
595.
596.
597.
598.
599.
600.
601.
602.
603.
604.
605.
606.
607.
608.
609.
610.
611.
612.
613.
614.
615.
616.
617.
618.
619.
620.
621.
622.
623.
624.
625.
626.
627.
628.
629.
630.
631.
632.
633.
634.
635.
636.
637.
638.
639.
640.
Hourly
# Rate
38.0920
38.2825
38.4739
38.6663
38.8596
39.0539
39.2492
39.4454
39.6426
39.8409
40.0401
40.2403
40.4415
40.6437
40.6469
41.0512
41.2564
41.4627
41.6700
41.8784
42.0878
42.2982
42.5097
42.7222
42.9358
43.1505
43.3663
43.5831
43.8010
44.0200
44.240
44.461
44.683
44.906
45.131
45.357
45.584
45.812
46.041
46.271
56.502
46.735
46.969
47.204
47.440
47.677
47.915
48.155
48.396
48.638
Bi-Weekly
Rate
3047.3620
3062.5988
3077.9118
3093.3014
3108.7679
3124.3117
3139.9333
3155.6330
3171.4111
3187.2682
3203.2045
3219.2206
3235.3167
3251.4932
3267.7507
3284.0895
3300.5100
3317.0125
3333.5975
3350.2655
3367.0168
3383.8519
3400.7712
3417.7750
3434.8639
3452.0382
3469.2964
3486.6449
3504.0781
3521.5985
3539.206
3556.902
3574.687
3592.560
3610.523
3628.576
3636.719
3664.953
3683.278
3701.694
3720.202
3738.803
3757.497
3776.264
3795.165
3814.141
3833.212
3852.378
3871.640
3890.998
Monthly
Rate
6603
6636
6669
6702
6736
6769
6803
6837
6871
6906
6941
6976
7011
7046
7081
7117
7152
7188
7224
7260
7296
7333
7370
7407
7444
7481
7518
7556
7594
7632
7670
7709
7747
7786
7825
7864
7903
7943
7983
8023
8063
8103
8144
8184
8225
8267
8308
8349
8391
6433
Hourly
Rantie # Rate
Bi-Weekly
Rate
Monthly
Rate
641. 48.881 3910.453 8475
642. 49.125 3930.005 8518
643. 49.371 3949.655 8560
644. 49.618 3969.403 8603
645. 49.866 3989.250 8646
646. 50.115 4009.196 8689
647. 50.366 4019.242 8733
648. 50.618 4049.388 8776
649. 50.871 4069.635 8820
65O. 51.125 4089.983 8864
651. 51.381 4110.4333 8909
652. 51.638 4130.985 8952
653. 51.896 4151.640 8996
654. 52.155 4172.400 9040
655. 52.40 4193.262 9085
656. 52.683 4214.230 9130
657. 52.943 4235.301 9175
658. 53.208 4256.478 9220
659. 53.474 4277.760 9266
660. 53.741 4299.150 9312
661. 54.010 4320.646 9359
662. 54.280 4342.249 9406
663. 54.551 4363.906 9453
664. 54.824 4385.780 9500
665. 55.098 4407.709 9548
666. 55.373 4429.748 9596
667. 55.650 4451.897 9644
668. 55.928 4474.156 9692
669. 56.208 4496.527 9740
670. 56.489 4519.010 9789
671. 56.771 4541.605
672. 57.055 4564.313
673. 57.340 4587.135
674. 57.627 4610.071
675. 57.915 4633.121
676. 58.205 4656.287
677. 58.496 4679.568
678. 58.788 4702,966
679. 59.082 4726.481
680. 59.377 4750.113
681. 59.674 4773.864
682. 59.972 4797.733
683. 60.272 4821.722
664. 60.573 4845.831
685. 60.876 4870.060
686. 61.180 4894.410
687. 61.486 4918.881
688. 61.793 4943.476
689. 62.102 4968.193
69O. 62.413 4993.034
9838
9887
9936
9986
10,036
10,086
10,137
10,188
10,239
10,290
10,341
10,393
10,445
10,497
10,550
10,603
10,656
10,709
10,763
10,816
Page 17
Hourly
Rancle # Rate
691. 62.725
692. 63.039
693. 63.354
694. 63.671
695. 63.989
696. 64.309
697. 64.631
698. 64.954
699. 65.279
700. 65.605
701. 65.933
702. 66.263
703. 66,594
704. 66.927
705. 67.261
706. 67.597
707. 67.934
708. 68.273
709. 68.614
710. 68.957
711. 69.392
712. 69.649
713. 69.998
714. 70.348
715. 70.700
716. 71.054
717. 71.410
718. 71.767
719. 72.126
720. 72.489
721. 72.850
722. 73.215
723. 73.581
724. 73,949
725. 74.319
726. 74.691
727. 75.065
728. 75.441
729. 75.819
730. 76.198
731. 76.579
732. 76.962
733. 77.347
734. 77.734
735. 78.123
736. 78.514
737. 78,907
738. 79.302
739. 79.699
740, 80.098
Bi-Weekly
Rate
5017.999
5043.089
5068.304
5093.646
5119.114
5144.710
5170.434
5196.286
5222,267
5248.378
5274.620
5300.992
5327.496
5364.133
5380.903
5407,807
5434.846
5462.020
5489.330
5516.776
5544.360
5572.082
5599.943
5627.943
5656.083
5664.364
5712.786
5741.350
5770.057
5798.908
5826.903
5857.043
5886.329
5915.761
5945.340
5975.067
6004,943
6034.968
6065.143
6095.469
6125.947
6156.577
6187.360
6218.297
6249.389
6280.636
6312.040
6343.601
6375,319
6407.196
Monthly
Rate
10,870
10,925
10,979
11,034
11,090
11,145
11,201
11,257
11,313
11,370
11,426
11,483
11,540
11,597
11,654
11,712
11,770
11,828
11,887
11,946
12,005
12,065
12,126
12,186
12,247
12,308
12,369
12,431
12,493
12,556
12,619
12,682
12,745
12,809
12,873
12,937
13,002
13,067
13,132
13,197
13,263
13,330
13,396
13,463
13,531
13,598
13,666
13,734
13,802
13,871
Ranqe #
Hourly
Rate
Bi-Weekly
Rate
Monthly
Rate
POLICE DEPARTMENT
C U C A M O N G A
Staff Report
DATE:
TO:
July 5, 2000
Mayor, Members of City Council and
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
Rodhey Hoops, Chief of Police
David S. Lau, Administrative Lieutenant
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL TO TRANSFER A CITY VEHICLE TO THE COUNTY OF SAN
BERNARDINO FOR POLICE SERVICES
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recomends lhat the City Coundl approve the Irarefer of a City vehicle to facilitate its use by/he County of San
BetmnJino in the operation oflhe Pofice Departmint 'Rapid ~ Incident Vehicle".
BACKGROUND
The City mcenfiy purchased the following listed vehicle through the b3cal Law Enforcemint Block Crant for use by the
Police 12kp,maent as its "Rapid Response Incident Vehicle":
2000 Chevrolet Tahoe, 4X4, Vehicle Identification Nmaber 1GNEK13TOYJ 184171.
~n~rderf~r~hevehic~et~beusedbyC~untypem~nne~thevehic~emustbetmmfetredt~theC~unty~fSmBerrmi~and
vdll available for use by the Police I2)qm~ent Responsibility for liability, maintenance, and fuel will be lhe sin,he as lhat
provided for other vehicles wiltin the Police ~eni' s fleet When lhe useful life of the vehicle ends title will be
tmnsfened back to the City ofRancho Cucamong~t
Chief of Police
RANCHO
CUCAMONGA
COMMUNITY SERVICES
Staff Report
DATE: July 5, 2000
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director
Dave Moore, Recreation Superintendent
LIGHT FEE WAIVER AMENDMENT FOR YOUTH SPORTS
RECREATION AND TRAVEL ORGANIZATIONS WHO CURRENTLY
ARE INELIGIBLE FOR EXISTING LIGHT FEE WAIVER.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Park and Recreation Commission is recommending that the City Council amend
their original light fee waiver policy to waive all light fees for all recreation youth sports
groups who meet a minimum of 80% residency. The current policy requires a minimum
residency requirement of 90%. The recommendation is for recreation groups only. The
Park and Recreation Commission does not recommend including the travel sports
groups within this proposal as suggested by the Sports Advisory Committee. It is
recommended that staff be directed to make the necessary changes in the fee
resolution at the appropriate time.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
On July 7, 1999, the City Council approved a full waiver for light fees for all Rancho
Cucamonga youth sports groups who meet 90% residency and accept all children who
wish to register regardless of ability. This particular waiver did not include any travel
team organizations because their recruitment or registration process does not accept all
who are interested but rather is based upon ability. Recreation youth sports
organizations with less than 90% residency were also ineligible for the light fee waiver.
Members of the Sports Advisory Committee began discussing this issue a few months
ago. Since then, the full Sports Advisory Committee has recommended to the Park and
Recreation Commission that the ineligible recreation and travel team organizations
receive a 70% light fee waiver.
MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
LIGHT FEE WAIVER AMENDMENT PROPOSAL
July 5, 2000
Page 2
There are really two issues that the Park and Recreation Commission considered:
1)
Whether to include recreation youth sports groups, who meet a minimum of 80%
residency, under the current light fee waiver policy. Note: 80% is also the
residency standard that all recreation groups must meet to receive City park and
school fields for games and practices.
2)
Whether to provide a partial light fee waiver of 70% to all youth sports travel team
organizations or to require the groups to continue to pay their light fees without
any light fee waiver,
After considerable review and discussion, the Park and Recreation Commission agreed
to the first issue and include in a recommendation to the City Council a full waiver of
light fees for all recreation youth sports groups that meet a minimum residency
requirement of 80%. In addition, the Park and Recreation Commission concurred with
the existing policy on requiring all youth sports travel organizations (second issue) to
continue paying their light fees without any waiver. Note: the majority of light fees
(except for Red Hill Community Park and the Epicenter and Sports Complex) have been
recently reduced by 50% due to a new agreement with Edison. It is anticipated that
Red Hill Community Park and the Epicenter and Sports Complex will be fitted with new
meters next fiscal year that will enable us to have the same discounted light fee for
these facilities too.
FISCAL IMPACT:
If this recommendation were approved, the City would realize a loss of $1,700 in light
fees. This is from the total amount of $10,956 that is normally submitted by those
groups ineligible (recreation and travel ball groups) for light fee waivers.
Respec Ily~,
Community Services Director
C H 0
CUCAMONGA
S 3ffReport
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
July 5, 2000
Mayor and members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Phillip Verbera, Assistant Engineer
APPROVAL OF MAP, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT
SECURITY AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 AND STREET LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 4 FOR TRACT 16000,
LOCATED IN TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITIES AND BOUNDED
BY CHURCH STREET, ELM AVENUE (WEST) AND SPRUCE AVENUE,
SUBMITTED BY LDC COUGAR LLC AND WESTERN LAND
PROPERTIES LP.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Tract
16000, accepting the subject agreement and security, ordering the annexation to
Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1
and 4 and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause
said map to record.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Tract 16000, located and bounded by Church Street, Elm Avenue (west) and Spruce
Avenue, in the Terra Vista Planned Communities in a High Residential District, was
approved by the Planning Commission on July 14, 1999, for the division of 16 acres into
6 lots (306 units).
The Developer, Western Land Properties, a California Limited Partnership, is submitting
an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements in
the following amounts:
Faithful Performance Bond
Labor and Material Bond:
Monumentation Security (cash)
$228,000.00
$114,000.00
$ 2,750.00
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
TRACT 16000
July 5, 2000
Page 2
Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office.
Letters of approval have been received from Cucamonga County Water District, The
Consent and Waiver to Annexation forms signed by the Developer are on file in the City
Clerk's office.
Respectfully submitted,
William J, O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:PV:sd
Attachments
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
TRACT MAP NUMBER 16000, IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY
WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 16000, submitted by Lewis Aparm~ent Communities,
and consisting of six (6) lots located in Terra Vista Planned Community and Bounded by Church
Street, Elm Avenue (west) and Spruce Avenue, was approved by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cueamonga, on July 14, 1999, and is in compliance with the State Subdivision Map
Act and Local Ordinance No. 28 adopted pursuant to that Act; and
WHEREAS, Tract Map No. 16000 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown
on said Tentative Tract Map; and
WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map
by the City Council of said City have now been met by entry into an Improvement Agreement
guaranteed by acceptable Improvement Security by Western Land Properties, a California Limited
Partnership, as developer; and
WHEREAS, said Developer submits for approval said Tract Map offering for dedication, for
street, highway and related purposes, the streets delineated thereon.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security submitted
by said developer be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign
said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to
attest; and that the offers for dedication and the final map delineating the same for said Tract Map
No. 16000 is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County
Recorder to be filed for record.
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE
ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 AND STREET LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4 FOR TRACT 16000
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously
formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act
of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said
special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 4, Street
Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 (referred to
collectively as the "Maintenance Districts"); and
WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act
of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance Districts; and
WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation
resolutions, an assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority
protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the
territory to be annexed; and
WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the 1972 Act related to the annexation
of territory to the Maintenance District, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of Califomia
("Article XIIID") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy
assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the Maintenance Districts on the
territory proposed to be annexed to such districts; and
WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this reference have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory')
be annexed to the Maintenance Districts in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to
finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the
"Improvements"); and
WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Tenitory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed
forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance
District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and
Waiver"); and
WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly
waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act to the annexation
of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and have expressly consented to the annexation of the
Territory to the Maintenance Districts; and
WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also
expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act and/or
Article XIIID applicable to the authorization to the levy the proposed annual assessment against the
Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have
declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization of levy such proposed annual
assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and
RESOLUTION NO.
TRACT 16000
July 5, 2000
Page 2
WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to
the Maintenance Districts and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in
amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct.
SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that:
The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not
exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such
parcel from the Improvements.
The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the
Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the
maintenance of the Improvement.
Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed
annual assessments.
SECTION3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Territory to the
Maintenance Districts, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the
proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy
of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in
Exhibit B.
SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the Maintenance Districts, including the levy of all
assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory.
Exhibit A
Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property
To Be Annexed
The Owner(s) of the Property is (are):
LDC Cougar, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company
and Western Land Properties, a California Limited Partnership
The legal description of the Property is:
ALL THAT PORTION OF LOT 1 SHOVv'N ON TRACT NO. 2202, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP
RECORDED IN BOOK 34 OF MAPS, PAGES 67 AND 67 V= , IN THE OFFICE OF THE
COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, LYING WITHIN THE AREA BOUNDED BY THE
FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE:
ON THE SOUTHWEST BY THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF CHURCH STREET, AS
DESCRIBED IN THE DEED TO THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, RECORDED
MARCH 14, 1989, AS INSTRUMENT NO. 89-090107 OFFICIAL RECORDS; ON THE NORTH
AND THE NORTHWEST BY THE SOUTHERLY AND SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF ELM
AVENUE WEST, AS DESCRIBED IN THE DEED TO THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
RECORDED FEBRUARY 13, 1986, AS INSTRUMENT NO. 86-038945 OFFICIAL RECORDS;
AND ON THE EAST BY THE WESTERLY LINE OF SPRUCE AVENUE, AS DESCRIBED IN
THE DEED TO THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, RECORDED MARCH 14, 1989 AS
INSTRUMENT NO. 89-090110, OFFICIAL RECORDS.
The above described parcels are shown on sheet A-2 attached herewith and by this reference
made a part hereof.
EXHIBIT "A"
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4
LEGEND
INDICATES PROPOSED STREET LIGHT (9500 LUMENS
INDICATES PROPOSED LANDSCAPING/IRRIGATION OF EXISTING MEDIAN
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
No Scale.
NORTtl
EXHIBIT "A.f~,''
Exhibit B
To
Description of the District Improvements
Fiscal Year 2000/2001
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community):
Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 (LMD #4) represents landscape sites throughout the Terra
Vista Planned Community. These sites are considered to e associated with areas within that district
and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those
parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to
those parcels within that district.
The various sites in Terra Vista that are maintained by the district consist of parkv~ays, median
islands, street trees, paseos and parks. The 36.23 acres of park consist of Coyote Canyon Park,
Milliken Park, West Greenway Park, Spruce Park and La Mission Park.
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (Arterial Streets):
Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (SLD #1) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation
of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The facilities within
this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the City as a whole on
an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or installation of the
facilities is assigned to the City-wide district.
The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on
arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City.
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community):
Street Light Maintenance District No. 4 (SLD #4) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation
of street lights and traffic signals located within the Terra Vista Planned Community. Generally this
area encompasses the residential area of the City east of Haven Avenue, south of Base Line Road,
north of Foothill Boulevard and west of Rochester Avenue. It has been determined that the facilities
in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City.
The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a
portion thereof) on local streets within the Terra Vista Planned Community.
Proposed additions to Work Program (Fiscal Year 2001/2002)
For Project: Tract 16000
Number of Lamps
Street Lights 5800L 9500L 16,000L 22,000L 27,500L
SLD#1 --- *11 .........
SLD #4 --- 4 .........
Community Trail Tuff Non-Turf Trees
Landscaping DGSF SF SF EA
L4 ...... 4,080 15
*Existing items installed with original project
Exhibit C
Proposed Annual Assessment
Fiscal Year 2000/2001
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community):
The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (Tract 16000) is:
306 Units (Multi-Family) x 1 A.U. Factor x $222.00 Rate Per A.U. = $67,932.00 Annual Assessment
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (Arterial Streets):
The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (Tract 16000) is:
306 Units (Multi-Family) x I A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. = $5,437.62 Annual Assessment
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community):
The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (Tract 16000) is:
306 Units (Multi-Family) x 0.5 A.U. Factor x $28.96 Rate Per A.U. = $4,430.88 Annual Assessment
c H 0
CUCAMONGA
ENCINEERINC DEPARTSlENT
DATE: July 5, 2000
TO:
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
ACCEPT THE BIDS RECEIVED, APPROPRIATE $176,417.40 FROM THE FUND
BALANCE OF FUND 22 (TRANSPORTATION) TO BE PLACED IN ACCOUNT NO. 22-
4637-9935, AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF THE CONTRACT FOR
THE CONSTRUCTION OF BANYAN STREET AT FREDERICKSBURG AVENUE
TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND WIDENING IMPROVEMENTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $171,417.40
($155,834.00 PLUS 10% CONTINGENCY) TO GENTRY BROTHERS, INC., THE
APPARENT LOW BIDDER, TO BE FUNDED FROM TRANSPORTATION FUND,
ACCOUNT NO. 22-4637-9935
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council accept the bids received, appropriate $176,417.40 ($171,417.40
for Gentry plus $5,000.00 for SCE and Flood Control) from the fund balance of Fund 22 (Transportation)
to be placed in Account No. 22-4637-9935, award and authorize for execution the contract for the
construction of the Banyan Street at Fredericksburg Avenue Traffic Signal and Widening Improvements in
the amount of $171,417,40 ($155,834.00 plus 10% contingency) to Gentry Brothers, Inc., the apparent
low bidder, to be funded from Transportation Fund Account No. 22-4637-9935.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on June 19, 2000, for the subject
project. The Engineer's estimate was $186,000. Staff has reviewed all bids received and found them to
be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements. Staff has completed the required background
investigation and finds all bidders to meet the requirements of the bid documents.
Respe ub~,/~
Willia~
City Engineer
WJO:JAD:mdl
Attachment
EXHIBIT "A"
Banyaa St~t
PROJECT
LIMITS
BANYAN STREET AT FREDERICKSBURG AVENUE
TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND WIDENING IMPROVEMENTS
VICINITY MAP
Bid Summary
Banyan Street at Fredericksburg Avenue Traffic Signal and Widening
400' West of Fredericksburg to 300' East of Fredericksburg along the South side
Date prepared: 06/22/00
Summary of unit cost and lump sum amounts Engineers est.
ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY. UNIT UNIT PRICE
1 Construct 5" CAB 274 TON $30,00
Construct Catch Basin W = 10' V = 4', inc. local
2 depression 1 EA $4,800.00
3 Construct PCC 8" Curb w/24" Gutter inc transitions 685 EA $1300
4 Construct PCC HC Ramp 1 LS $600.00
5 PCC Drive approach 425 SF $600
6 4" Sidewalk 149 SF $300
7 Construct 4" AC pavement inc removals 245 TON $60.00
Canstruct 18" RCP 15009 inc removing Brick and
8 Mortar Plug and adjusting GTE conduits 20 LF $180.00
9 6' Chain link fence and gates 1 LS $1,000.00
Traffic Signal (Poles & mast arms are City
10 furnished) 1 LS $135,90000
11 Signing and Stdping 1 LS $3,000.00
12 Traffic Control 1 LS $3,500.00
Gentry Eros.
AMOUNT ITEM UNIT PRICE
$8,22000 I $3000
$4,80000 2 $5,50000
$8,905.00 3 $1300
$600 O0 4 $t,20000
$2,55000 5 $4.50
$44700 6 $350
$14.70000 7 $7500
$3,60000 8 $300.00
$%00000 9 $2,20000
$135,000.00 10 $94,00000
$3.00000 11 $5,000.00
$3.50000 12 $4,000.00
Total of Bid Items: $186,322.00
Vance Corp
ITEM UNIT PRICE AMOUNT
1 $20.00 $5,480,00
2 $5,600.00 $5,600,00
3 $12.60 $8,631,00
4 $1,510,00 $1,5t000
5 $8.10 $3.442,50
6 $8.00 $1,192.00
7 $82.50 $20,21250
8 $25000 $5,00000
9 $2,86000 $2,850.00
10 $91,30000 $91,300.00
11 $3,24000 $3,240,00
12 $19,512.00 $19,512 00
Total of Bid Items: $167,980.00
Total of Bid Items:
EGN Constr.
ITEM UNIT PRICE
1 $9200
2 $5,300.00
3 $11,65
4 $1,500.00
5 $3,50
6 $250
7 $118.00
8 $250 00
9 $2,00000
10 $83,000.00
11 $5,400.00
12 $3,55000
Tota[ of Bid Items:
Bid total shown on Proposal:
h & H General Contractors Average of Bids
ITEM UNIT PRICE AMOUNT ITEM UNIT PRtCE
1 $81.00 $22.194,00 t $45.50
2 $5,000,00 $5,000.00 2 i~;,691,67 -
3 S20.C0 S13,700 00 3 $14.13
4 $2.500 00 S2,500.00 4 $1.705.00
5 $8.00 $3,400.00 5 · $6.52
6 S10 00 $1,490 00 6 $5.92
7 $50.00 j $~2.250.00 7 $70.09
0 8137.00 i $2]40.00 8 $202.00
9: $4,800.00 $4.000 O0 9 93,135.00
S81.006 00 $91.000.00 10 992,115.83
11 $6.300.00 $5,300.00 11 $5,053 17
S21 050.00 S21.050.00 12 $15,518.67
Total of Bid Items: $t 85,624.00
AMOUNT
$8~220.00
$5.500 O0
$8,90500
$%20000
$52150
$16.37500
$8,00000
$2,20000
$94,00000
$5,00000
$4.00000
$t55,834.00
AMOUNT
$25,208,00
$5,300.00
$7,990,25
$1,500.00
$1,467,50
$372.50
$28,910,00
$5,000,00
$2,00000
$83,00000
$5,40000
$3,55000
$169,709,25
$169.70830
AMOUNT
$12,467.00
$9.575.63
$1.785.00
$2,769.58
$881.58
$17.170.42
$4,040.00
$3,135.00
$5,083.17
$15,518.67
Laird Construeion
"EM UNIT PRICE AMOUNT
$2500 $6,850.00
2 $3.250.00 $3,250 90
3 $1250 $8,56250
4 $1,500.00 $1,50000
5 $9.00 $3,625.00
6 $750 $1,11750
7 $4000 $9,80000
8 $175.00 $3,50000
9 $2,750.00 $2,75000
10 $103,250.00 $103,250.00
11 $5,000,00 $5,000.00
12 $15,00000 $15,00000
Total of Bid Items: $t 64,405.00
B. A Construeion
'EM UNIT PRICE AMOUNT
1 $2500 $6,850.00
2 $3,50000 $3,500,00
3 $15.00 $10,275.00
4 $2,50000 $2,50000
5 $6.00 $2,55000
6 $4.00 $596.00
7 $55.00 $13,47500
8 $10000 $2,00000
9 $5,00000 $5,000.00
10 $90,145.00 $90,145.00
11 $5,55900 $5,55900
12 $30.00000 $30,00000
Totalof Bid Items: $172,490.00
RANCHd
DATE:
T~.
FROM:
SUI~_L~:
July 5, 2000
Mayor and M~/nbers of the City Council
Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager
APPROVAL TO APPROPRIATE FUNDS AND AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE
EXECUTION OF THE CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $159,400 ($144,842
PLUS 10% CONTINGENCY) FOR THE TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY
LIGH'I1NG AT CARNELIAN STREET AND LA VINE/LA GRANDE STREETS, TO
THE APPARENT LOW BIDDER L.A. SIGNAL, TO BE FUNDED FROM
TRANSPORTATION FUND ACCOUNT 22-4637-9921.
It is recommended that the City Council approve the appropriation and award and authorize for execution
the contract for the traffic signals and safety lighting at Carnelian Street and La Vine/La Grande Streets,
to the apparent low bidder, L.A. Signal, to be funded from Transportation Fund account 22-4637-9921.
BACKGROUND ANALYSIS:
Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on May 23, 2000, for the subject
project. The Engineer's estimate was $132,000. Staff has reviewed all b~ds received and fbund them to
be complete and m a~cordance with the bid requirements. Staff has completed the required background
investigation and found all bidders to meet the requirements of the bid documents.
City Engineer
WJO:JTH:dbm
Attachment
Bids Opened on May 23, 2000
Item ~tem
No. Description
I Traffic Signal & Safety Lighting at
Intersection of Came}ian Street and
La Vine/La Grande Streets
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
SUMMARY OF PROPOSALS FOR
TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT
Unit of Estimated
Measure Quantity
LS I
Engineer's Estimate =
IL.A- Signal IVido Samarzfeh Inc. I
Total Total
Unit price Bid Unit price Bid
$144,842.00 $144.842.00 $156,300.00 $156.300.00
ITOTAL: $144,842.00 ITOTAL: $156,300.00 I
Item Item
No, Description
I Traffic Signal & Safety Lighting at
intersection of Carnelian Street and
La Vlne/La Grande Streets
Unit of Estimated
Measure Quantity
LS I
II.E.C, IPro Tech I
Total Total
Unit Price Bid Unit Price Bid
$158,997.00 $158.997.00 $159,348.00 $159,348.00
ITOTAL: $158,997.00 ITOTAL: $159,348.00 I
Item Item
No. Description
I Traffic Signal & Safety LigMIng st
Intersection of Carnelian Street and
La VinelLa Grande Streets
Item Item
No. Description
I Traffic Signal & Safety Lighting at
Intersection of Carnelian Street and
La Vine/La Grande Streets
Unit of Estimated
Measure Quantity
LS, 1
Unit of Estimated
Measure Quantity
LS 1
ISteiny & Co., Inc. - ~Matt Gardner Const. I
Total Total
Unit Price Bid Unit Price Bid
$163,904.00 $163,904.00 $167,426.00 $167.426.00
ITOTAL: $163.904.00 ITOTAL; $167,426,00 I
INew West Signal ~DBX, Inc. ~
Total Total
Unit Price Bid Unit Price Bid
$167.955.00 $167,955.00 $173,307.00 $173,307.00
ITOTAL: $167,955.00 ]TOTAL: $173,307.00
Item item
No. Oescription
· 1 Traffic Signal & Safety Lighting at
Intersection of Carnelian Street and
La Vine/La Grande Streets
Unit of Estimated
Measure Quantity
LS I
ISignal Maintenance tDynafectric
Total Total
Unit Price Bid Unit Price Bid
$177,950.00 $177,950,00 $179,537.00 $179,537.00
iTOTAL: $177.950.00 1TOTAL: $179,537.00
THE CiTY
i~ANCHO
0 F
Sti ffReport
DA'IE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
July 5, 2000
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Betty A. Miller, Associate Engineer
APPROVAL TO ACKNOWLEDGE A CONSENT AGREEMENT
BETWEEN WILLIAM LYON HOMES, INC., AND SOUTHERN
CALIFORNIA EDISON REGARDING IMPROVEMENTS TO VICTORIA
PARK LANE CROSSING EDISON RIGHTS-OF-WAY ADJACENT TO
TRACT 15871, SUBMITTED BY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council acknowledge the Consent Agreement between
William Lyon Homes, Inc., and Southern California Edison for the Victoria Park Lane
road crossing and authorize the City Engineer to sign said document through adoption
of the attached resolution.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
As a condition of approval for Tentative Tract 15871, William Lyon Homes was required
to construct Victoria Park Lane across the Southern California Edison easement
between Rochester Avenue and Day Creek Boulevard. Edison has given conceptual
approval to the street improvement plans for the crossing, which is already constructed.
Said approval was granted subject to 34 conditions outlined in a letter dated February 1,
2000. Two of the conditions note that maintenance responsibility, for the drainage
structures and parkway landscaping within the Edison easement, will be assumed by
the City. Therefore, Edison is requesting that the City also sign the letter
acknowledging these conditions.
Once Edison has received the signed consent letter, they will execute the road
easement granting Victoria Park Lane to the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
%~~N e i'llb~
City Engineer
WJO:BAM:sd
Attachment
FeD
~ ViCll:ntmA pA~,
-l_
HIGHLAND AVE
12900
DR
CITY OF
~RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ENGINEERING DIVISION
BASE LINE RD
NORTH ~ 1 "= 1000'
ITEM: Vicinity Map
TITLE: SCE Agreement
EXHIBIT: "A"
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
ACKNOWLEDGING THE CONDITIONS OF AN
AGREEMENT BETWEEN WILLIAM LYON HOMES, INC.,
AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON REGARDING
INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN
VICTORIA PARK LANE ACROSS THE SOUTHERN
CALIFORNIA EDISON RIGHT-OF-WAY WHICH WILL
BECOME THE CITY'S RESPONSIBILITY
WHEREAS, Southern California Edison (Edison) has conditionally approved a
request for a road easement for Victoria Park lane by William Lyon Homes (Developer),
the developer of Tract 15871; and
VVHEREAS, some of the conditions of that approval address maintenance items
which will be assumed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga once the public
improvements are accepted; and
WHEREAS, Edison has prepared a Consent Agreement in the form of a letter to
be acknowledged by the Developer and the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, HEREBY RESOLVES that said Agreement between
Edison and the Developer be and the same is hereby acknowledged and the City
Engineer is hereby authorized to sign said Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga.
An EDISON INIERNATIONAL''~ Company
Mr. Michael Schneider
Utility Consultants of Orange County
23101 Moulton Parkway
Suite 202
Laguna Hills, CA 92653
February 1, 2000
Subject:
Request for Road Easement for Victoda Park Lane
Grading of slopes and temporary construction access
William Lyon Homes, Inc., Tract 15871
Etiwanda-Padua 220 kv T/L PJW
RP File No. GRT 990017
This letter supersedes my letter of November 3, 1999. Items 14 and 15 have been
revised and the City of Rancho Cucamonga added to the approval line.
Edison has reviewed and is unable to grant approval for the slopes within the Edison
dght of way as shown on the Rough Grading Plans for Tract No. 15871. The slopes
would diminish Edison's ability to utilize the full width of its dght of way for future
electrical facilities. Edison has no objection to the temporary construction access
roads, provided that environmental clearances are obtained and submitted for review
and approval. As of this date, the clearance has not been received and Edison cannot
issue a Temporary Entry Permit until they are submitted. A fee will be determined by
Edison's Real Estate Revenue group for the temporary use of Edison property for the
construction access.
Edison is giving conceptual approval to your request for a road crossing and an inlet
drain, as shown on the attached plans entitled "Street Improvement Plans, Victoria
Park Lane, Tract 15871" dated May 24, 1999, beadng Edison's approval date of August
16, 1999. It must be emphasized that these conditions are given from a review of the
preliminary plans mentioned above. Any changes in the final plans may impose further
conditions to this consent,
As a utility operating high voltage electric lines which serve a major portion of Southern
California, Edison's approval is granted subject to the conditions listed below to provide
for the safety of others, to protect the electric system from damage, and to prevent
service interruptions.
All equipment working on the Edison right of way shall maintain a minimum
clearance of seventeen (17) feet from all overhead conductors and twenty-five (25)
feet from any Edison structures. Construction equipment shall not be parked on the
Edison right of way.
2. Adequate access to all Edison structures shall be provided and at no time is there
to be any interference with the free movement of Edison's equipment and materials.
3. Flammable materials shall not be stored on the Edison right of way.
14805 Chestnut St.
Westminster. CA 92685
800-817-3677
Fax 714 954-0857
William Lyon Homes, Inc. 2 02/01/00
4. Parking of vehicles and staging of equipment or matedais shall not be permitted
within the Edison right of way.
5. The construction area shall be watered down periodically to prevent dust
contamination to Edison insulators. Any maintenance required by Edison on its
facilities over and above normal, and resulting from this operation, shall be paid for
by William Lyon, Inc.
6, Any earth disturbed within the Edison right of way, and/or backfilling, shall be
compacted to 90 percent (90%).
7, The Edison right of way must be left in essentially the same condition as pdor to the
commencement of the proposed work and must be satisfactory to Edison.
8. At no time shall Edison's access to any pole or tower location be cut off dudng any
temporary grading operation.
9. Construction of the crossing (cut or fill) must be adequately sloped to enable access
of equipment onto Edison access roads.
10. All slopes within or adjacent to the subject right of way shall have a maximum slope
of 2:1.
11. Fill shall be compacted throughout their full extent to a minimum of 90 percent of
maximum dry density as determined by A.S.T.M. Soil Compaction Test D-1557-78
and inspected and appreved by the Geotechnical Engineer.
12. Since the readway is needed to provide proper pedestrian, as well as vehicular
flow, sidewalks, curbs, and gutters shall be installed at this time at no expense to
the Edison Company.
13. Any landscape or irrigation within the right of way must be appreved by Edison in
wdting prior to being installed.
14. The drainage structure within the subject Edison dght of way shall be maintained by
William Lyon Homes, Inc. until such time as the responsibility for maintenance of
the drainage structure is assumed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
15. Any irrigation or landscaping damaged by, or requiring relocation for Edison in the
future, shall be repaired or relocated by William Lyon Homes, Inc. at no cost to the
Edison Company until such tim as the responsibility for the street improvements,
irrigation and landscaping are assumed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. When
that occurs, the City of Rancho Cucemonga will bear the cost of repairs,
replacement or relocetion.
16. All public or private streets that Edison will be using for access must be capable of
supporting a gross load of 40 tons on a three-axle truck.
William Lyon Homes, Inc. 3 02/01/00
17. All runoff is to be channeled away from the subject dght of way unless proper
drainage facilities are provided. Drainage plans, to include all access roads must
be approved in wdting prior to construction.
18. No sprinkler controllers shall permitted on the Edison right of way.
19. Commercial-type driveways twenty-four feet wide, with curb depressions capable of
supporting forty (40) tons on a throe-axle truck shall be installed on the Edison dght
of way as shown on the herein referonced plans.
20. No fencing is allowed on the Edison right of way.
21. All utilities crossing the Edison right of way must do so within the stroet right of way.
22. Underground facilities installed on the right of way shall have a minimum cover of
three feet and shall be capable of withstanding a gross load of 40 tons on a throe-
axle truck.
23. Suitable identification markers shall be installed indicating the location and depth of
any underground lines and/or pipelines.
24. No valves, fire hydrants, or controllers for any pipelines or irrigation aro allowed on
the Edison right of way.
25. The Edison right of way shall be graded to provide positive drainage from all areas
and have adequate channelization to prevent erosion of slopes and access roads.
26. No additional structures or other development shall be permitted within the Edison
right of way, other than those approved heroin.
27. At all times during construction of the subject building, the California Code of
Regulations, Title 8, ArtiCle 37, Provisions for Proventing Accidents Due to Proximity
to Overhead Lines, must be adhered to.
28. William Lyon Homes, Inc. agrees, for itself, and for its and their agents and
employees and any person or persons claiming under William Lyon Homes, Inc., to
save harmless and indemnify Edison, its successors and assigns and its and their
officers, agents and employees, from and against all claims, demands, loss,
damage, actions, causes of action, expense and/or liability arising or growing out of
loss of or damage to property including the property of Edison, its successors and
assigns, and its and their officers, agents and employees, or injury to or death of
persons, rosulting in any manner, diroctly or indirectly, from the maintenance, use,
operation, repair or presence of the use approved herein.
29. Final plans and any revisions thereof, including grading plans, must be submitted to
Edison for review and approval at least 60 days prior to commencement of any
construction affecting the Edison dght of way.
30. Any existing Edison facilities shall be protected in place, Pdor to ~tarting work,
Edison shall be notified of the intended method of protection.
William Lyon Homes, Inc.
4 02~1~0
31. Edison shall be notified 48 hours pdor to the start of construction in order that
arrangements can be made for Edison personnel to monitor operations as deemed
necessary by Edison.
32. All notices required to be given to Edison heroin shall be made in writing with a
reference to the file number, and shall be deposited in the United States mail, first
class, postage prepared, addressed to Southern California Edison Company, Real
Estate Operations, 14803 Chestnut Street, Westminster, CA, 92683,
33. All costs incurred for the proposed project shall be berne by William Lyon
Homes, Inc.
34. Any costs Edison may have in connection with this request will be bome by William
Lyon Homes, Inc.
This agreement is personal to William Lyon Homes, Inc. and is not transferable without
Edison's prior written consent.
Please arrange to have the appropriate party sign and date the enclosed copy of this
letter, thereby indicating accaptanca of the above conditions, and return the signed
copy to this office, using the enclosed envelope.
Edison appreciates the oppodunity to review your plans and thanks you for your
cooperation in coordinating your project with our company. If you have any questions,
please centact me at (909) 945-1398.
Genie Sandere
Right of Way Agent
ACCEPTEDANDAPPROVED:
WILLIAM LYON HOMES, INC.
By ~ Date:
Title ~re.r~<~r ~),'ce_. %; cl.~-~r'
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
By Date:
Title
Estimated Completion Date
cc: Jim Resheske
T HE CITY
RAI~CtlO
OF
C~CAMOXGA
St fffReport
DATE:
Tff.
FROM:
BY:
July 5, 2000
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Monte Prescher, Public Works Engineer
ACCEPT THE INSTALLATION OF PARK AND WALKWAY LIGHTING IN
CHURCH STREET PARK, RELEASE BONDS, AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY
ENGINEER TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION AND APPROVE THE
FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $72,700.00
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council accept the Installation of Park and Walkway Lighting in
Church Street Park, Contract No. 99-107, as complete, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of
Completion and authorize the release of Bonds and approve the final contract amount of $72,700.00.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications
and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The final contract amount is $72,700.00. There are no
Change Orders. The original amount approved by City Council is $79,970.00 ($72,700.00 plus 10%
contingency).
Respectfully submitted,
j.O,Nei~l~Cf57
City Engineer
WJO:MP/DBM
Attachments
RESOLUTION NO. Or9- }S5
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE
INSTALLATION OF PARK AND WALKWAY LIGHTING IN
CHURCH STREET PARK, AS COMPLETE, AND AUTHORIZE
THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for the Installation of Park
and Walkway Lighting in Church Street Park, Contract No. 99-107, has been completed to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer; and
complete.
WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby
resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a
Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino.
ORDINANCE NO. 623
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING VICTORIA
COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 00-01, CHANGING THE LAND
USE DESIGNATION FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14
DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL
(4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 22.9 ACRES OF LAND
LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BASE LINE ROAD,
APPROXIMATELY 765 FEET WEST OF THE INTERSECTION
WITH VICTORIA PARK LANE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 227-881-01
RECITALS.
1.
Charles Joseph Associates has filed an application on behalf of DR Hodon and
Mark Taylor Corporation for Victoria Community Plan Amendment 00-01 as
described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the
subject Victoria Community Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application."
On May 24, 2000, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted a duly noticed public hearing on General Plan Amendment 00-01 B
and recommended to the City Council that the associated general plan
amendment be approved by the adoption of Resolution No. 00~49.
On May 24, 2000, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and recommended
its approval by the adoption of Resolution No. 00-50.
On June 21,2000 the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted
a duly noticed public hearing on General Plan Amendment 00-01B and
concluded said public hearing by adopting the general plan amendment.
On June 21, 2000 the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted
a duly noticed public hearing on Victoria Community Plan Amendment 00-01.
All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. ORDINANCE.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and ordained by the City
Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the
Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
Ordinance No. 623
Page 2 of 5
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this City Council during the
above-referenced public headng on June 21, 2000, including written and oral
staff repods, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically
finds as follows:
The application applies to approximately 22.9 acres of land, basically
a rectilinear configuration, located on the north side of Base Line
Road, approximately 765 feet west of Victoria Park Land, which is
presently vacant. Said property is currently designated as Medium
Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) within the Victoria
Community Plan; and
The property to the north of the subject site is an unused raftread
right-of-way, and beyond that is Low-Medium Residential (4-8
dwelling units per acre), which is developed with a single-family
neighborhood. The property to the west is designated Medium and
is developed with a public storage facility. The property to the east
is designated Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per
acre) and Neighborhood Commercial and is developed with an
apartment complex and a neighborhood retail center. The property
to the south is designated High Residential (24-30 dwelling units per
acre) and is developed with the historic Regina Winery; and
This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the
General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a
manner consistent with the General Plan and with related
development; and
d. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land
Use Element; and of the Victoria Community Plan, and;
This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to
the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on
the environment nor the surrounding properties.
Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this City Council during the
above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth
in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as
follows:
The subject prepedy is suitable for the uses permitted in the
proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with
existing land use in the surrounding area by satisfying the minimum
parcel size requirement for the land use designation and continuing
the single-famfiy residential development pattem along the north side
of Base Line Road; and
The proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the
environment nor the surrounding properties as evidenced by the
conclusions listed in the Initial Study Parts I and II; and
Ordinance No. 623
Page 3 of 5
The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan
by providing a land use pattern that is complementary with nearby
parcels of land.
Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative
Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the
environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds
that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect
upon the environment and adopts a Negative Declaration based upon the
findings as follows:
That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with
the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and
the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said
Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect
the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further,
this Commission has reviewed and considered the information
contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the
application.
That based upon the changes and alterations which have been
incorporated into the proposed project, no significant adverse
environmental effects will occur.
Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the
California Code of Regulations, the City Council finds as follows: In
considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative
Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed
project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife
resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further,
based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative
Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information
provided to the City Council during the public hearing, the City
Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth
in Section 753.5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of
Regulations.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, 3, and 4
above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of Victoria Community
Plan Amendment No. 00-01 to change the land use designation to Low-Medium
Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) within the Victoria Community Plan as
shown on Exhibit "A" of this ordinance
6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance.
Ordinance No. 623
Page 4 of 5
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 5th day of July.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAINED:
William J. Alexander, Mayor
A'R'EST:
Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk
I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California,
do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the Council
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 21 st day of June 2000, and was passed at a regular
meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 5th day of July 2000.
Executed this 6th day of July 2000, at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk
no scale I~1
ORDINANCE NO. 624
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 00-01, A REQUEST TO
AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS MAP AND
DEVELOPMENT CODE FROM MEDIUM-HIGH RESIDENTIAL (14-
24 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) AND GENERAL COMMERCIAL
TO MIXED USE WITH A SENIOR HOUSING OVERLAY DISTRICT
FOR 3.24 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF
AMETHYST STREET, SOUTH OF THE INTERSECTION WITH LA
GRANDE STREET AND NORTH OF THE INTERSECTION WITH
LOMITA DRIVE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT
THEREOF- APN: 202-151-12.
RECITALS.
1.
m
The Nodhtown Housing Development Corporation has filed an application for
Development District Amendment No. 00-01, as described in the title of this
Resolution. Hereina~er in this Resolution, the subject Development District
Amendment is referred to as "the application."
On May 24, and continued to June 14, 2000, the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on an
associated General Plan Amendment application and issued Resolution No. 00-
57, recommending to the City Council that General Plan Amendment No. 00-01A
be approved.
On May 24, and continued to June 14, 2000, the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the
application and recommended approval of the application by the adoption of
Resolution No. 00-58.
On June 21, 2000, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted
a duly noticed public hearing on the associated General Plan Amendment
application and issued Resolution No. 00-128, approving the associated General
Plan Amendment No. 00-01A.
On June 21,2000, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted
as duly noticed public headng on the application and concluded said hearing on
that date.
All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.
Ordinance No. 624
Page 2 of 6
B. ORDINANCE.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does
hereby find, determine, and ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set fodh
in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct.
SECTION 2:
Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council
during the above-referenced public hearing on June 21, 2000,
including written and oral staff reports, together with public
testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows:
a) The application applies to approximately 3.24 acres of land,
basically a triangular configuration, located on the east side
of Amethyst Street, south of the intersection with La Grande
Street and north of the intersection with Lomita Drive, which
is presently vacant. Said property is currently designated as
General Commercial General and Medium-High Residential
(14-24 dwelling units per acre); and
b) The property to the north of the subject site is designated
Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and is
developed with the Alta Loma Elementary School. The
properties to the west are designated General Commercial
and are developed with small retail shops. The properties to
the east and south are designated Medium-High Residential
and are vacant and developed with apartment complexes;
and
c) This amendment does not confiict with the Land Use Policies
of the General Plan and will provide for development within
the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and
with related development; and
d) This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of
the Land Use Element; and
e) This amendment would not be materially injurious or
detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a
significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding
properties.
SECTION 3:
Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council
during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific
findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this
Council hereby finds and concludes as follows:
Ordinance No. 624
Page 3 of 6
a) That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in
the proposed district in terms of access, size, and
compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area as
evidenced by its frontage on a public street, its size
exceeding minimum size requirements for the land use
designation, and the evidence of conveniently located
commercial facilities for a senior population in the immediate
area; and
b) That the proposed amendment would not have significant
impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties as
evidenced by the existing multiple family and small
commercial activities in the immediate area; and
c) That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the
General Plan which contains provisions for Mixed Use land
use designations.
SECTION 4:
a)
b)
c)
Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed
Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports
included for the environmental assessment for the application,
the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that
the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and
adopts a Negative Declaration based upon the findings as
follows:
That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of
1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines
promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and
the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent
judgment of the City Council; and further, this Council has
reviewed and considered the information contained in said
Negative Declaration with regard to the application.
That based upon the changes and alterations which, have
been incorporated into the proposed project, no significant
adverse environmental effects will occur.
Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of
the California Code of Regulations, the City Council finds as
follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study
and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence
that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse
impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which
wildlife depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence
contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and
exhibits, and the information provided to the City Council
during the public hearing, the City Council hereby rebuts the
presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-
1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations.
Ordinance No. 624
Page 4 of 6
SECTION 5:Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in
paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Council hereby approves
Development Distdct Amendment No. 00-01 to establish a Mixed
Use District at the site described in this Ordinance, as shown in
Exhibit "A" of this Ordinance, and described with the following
text to be added to the Development Code as Section
17.08.030.F.1:
"1. Historic AIta Loma - Amethyst Site: This 3.24 acre site is located on the
east side of Amethyst Street, generally be~lveen the "T" intersections
extensions of Lomita Drive and La Grande Street, in the original Alta Loma
downtown. The following table specifies the uses and range of development
that may be permitted on the site:
Percent Acreage
Land Use Mix Range RanRe
Medium-High Residential
(14-24 dwelling units per acre)
0% - 100%
0 - 3.24 acres
Office 0% - 100% 0 - 3.24 acres
The land use categories within the mixed use area shall be of the character
and intensity as defined in Development Code Chapters 17. 08 and 17. 10. Aft
uses that may be authorized under the Office designation are subject to
Conditional Use Permit approval. The corresponding development standards,
as listed in Chapters 17. 08 and 17. 10, for each permitted land use shall be
applicable to development within the Mixed Use District."
SECTION 6: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 5th day of July.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAINED:
William J. Alexander, Mayor
Ordinance No. 624
Page 5 of 6
ATTEST:
Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk
I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California,
do hereby cedify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the Council
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 21 st day of June 2000, and was passed at a regular
meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 5th day of July 2000.
Executed this 6th day of July 2000, at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk
FR
×
= DDA 00-01 - Development District Map
:::::::::::i~,~ii:~
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
i/i/i!' )HIGH
.................... ' ..... ~ LOW
~ MEDIUM
~::L~::: ~ ~ ~ MEDIUM HIGH
, ,:~ ~ NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL
::::::::::::::::::::::::::: O~mfess,o~m ]~::~::~:~" ~=~ ~ OFFICE/PROFESSIONAL
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :-:-:,:-'-'-'-:
Baseline Rd.
no scale
N
ORDINANCE NO. 625
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO.
00-01, A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND NORTHTOWN HOUSING
DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF
PROVIDING A SENIOR HOUSING PROJECT IN ACCORDANCE
WITH THE SENIOR HOUSING OVERLAY DISTRICT (SHOD),
INCLUDING DEVIATING FROM CERTAIN DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS FOR 80 TO 96 SENIOR APARTMENT UNITS
AND ONE MANAGER UNIT LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF
AMETHYST STREET, SOUTH OF THE INTERSECTION WITH
LA GRANDE STREET AND NORTH OF THE INTERSECTION
WITH LOMITA DRIVE - APN: 202451-12.
RECITALS.
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
California Government Code Section 65864 now provides, in
pertinent part, as follows:
"The Legislature finds and declares that:
a) The lack of certainty in the approval of development
projects can result in a waste of resources, escalate the
cost of housing and other developments to the consumer,
and discourage investment in and commitment to
comprehensive planning which would make maximum
efficient utilization of resources at the least economic cost
to the public.
b) Assurance to the applicant for a development project that
upon approval of the project, the applicant may proceed
with the project in accordance with existing policies, rules
and regulations, and subject to conditions of approval, will
strengthen the public planning process, encourage private
participation in comprehensive planning, and reduce the
economic costs of development."
California Government Code Section 65865 provides,
pertinent part, as follows:
"Any city...may enter into a Development Agreement with
any person having a legal or equitable interest in real
property for the development of such property as provided in
this article..."
in
California Government Code Section 65865.2 provides, in part,
as follows:
Ordinance No. 625
Page 2 of 19
(iv)
(v)
(vi)
(vii)
"A Development Agreement shall specify the duration of the
Agreement, the permitted uses of the properly, the density of
intensity of use, the maximum height and size of proposed
buildings, and provisions for reservation or dedication of land
for public purposes. The Development Agreement may
include conditions, terms, restrictions, and requirements for
subsequent discretionary actions, provided that such
conditions, terms, restrictions, and requirements for
discretionary actions shall not prevent development of the
land for the uses and to the density of intensity of
development set forth in the Agreement..."
"Attached to this Ordinance, marked as Exhibit "A" and
incorporated herein by this reference is proposed Development
Agreement 00-01, concerning that properly located on the east
side of Amethyst Street, south of the intersection with La Grande
Street, and as legally described in the attached Development
Agreement. Hereinafier in this Ordinance, the Development
Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit "A" is referred to as the
"Development Agreement."
On May 24, and continued to June 14, 2000, the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a duly
noticed hearing concerning the Development Agreement and
concluded said hearing on that date and recommended approval
through adoption of its Resolution.
On June 21, 2000, the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing concerning
the Development Agreement.
All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance
have occurred.
A. ORDINANCE.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does
hereby find, determine, and ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set
forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and
correct.
SECTION 2:
Prior to the adoption of this Ordinance, this Council has
reviewed the Initial Study, Parts I and II, and the Development
Agreement, and certified the Negative Declaration, in
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of
1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated
thereunder.
Ordinance No. 625
Page 3 of 19
SECTION 3:
Based upon substantial evidence presented during the above-
reference public hearings on May 24, and June 14 and June
21, 2000, including written and oral staff reports, together with
public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as
follows:
a) The location, design, and proposes uses set forth in this
Development Agreement are compatible with the character
of existing development in the vicinity.
b) The Development Agreement conforms to the General
Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
SECTION 4:
It is expressly found that the public necessity, general welfare,
and good zoning practice require the approval of the
Development Agreement.
SECTION 5: This Council hereby approves Development Agreement 00-01,
attached hereto as Exhibit "A".
SECTION 6:
The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall
cause the same to be published with 15 days after its passage
at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper
of general circulation published in the City of Ontario,
California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 5th day of July.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAINED:
William J. Alexander, Mayor
Ordinance No. 625
Page 4 of 19
ATTEST:
Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk
I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of
the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 21't day of June 2000, and was
passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the
5th day of July 2000.
Executed this 6th day of July 2000, at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk
Ordinance No. 624
Page 5 of 19
E. EVELO:'%vIIcNT/~GREEMEN 1' NO, 00-01
SENIOR CITIZENS' HOUSING
THIS AGREEMENT is entered into as of the "Effective Date" set forth herein by and between
NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, a California NON PROFIT PUBLIC BENEFIT
'CORPORATION ("Developer") and the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation organized
and existing under the laws of the State of California ("City').
WITNESSETH:
Recitals.
1. California Government Code Sections 65864 et seq. Authorizes cities to enter into Binding
development agreements with persons having legal or equitable interests in real properly for
the development of such property.
California Government Code Section 65915 provides that a City may, by agreement with a
developer, grant a density bonus over that allowed by the maximum density established in
the Development Code and Land Use Element of the General Plan when a developer agrees
to construct housing for low income senio.r, households.
The Developer has requested City to consider the approval of a development agreement, with
a density bonus, pertaining to that real property located entirely within City, the common and
legal description of which is set forth in Exhibit "A," attached hereto and incorporated herein
by this reference.
The site is now zoned Mixed Use with a Senior Housing Oveday District pursuant to the
provisions of City's Development Code. as amended to date hereof. Developer and City
desire to provide through this Development Agreement more specific development controls
on the site which, will provide for maximum efficient utilization of the site in accordance with
sound planning principles.
The Developer proposes to construct a senior housing residential project, including low-
income units, within the City. Said project contemplated by Developer will require an
increase in the maximum density as currently provided in the Mixed Use District with a Senior
Housing Oveday District.
Ordinance No. 624
Page 6 of 19
It is the desire of City to encourage developments designed to provide affordable rental units
for senior residents of the City. In furtherance of that desire, the City is hereby willing to grant
a density bonus to Developer as provided by the terms of this Agreement.
That any housing project developed pursuant to this agreement, and any subsequent land
use approvals required by City ordinances, shall comply with all appropriate provisions of the
California Environmental Quality Act.
On July 5, 2000, City adopted its Ordinance No. , thereby approving this
Development Agreement with Developer and said action was effective on August 5, 2000.
A~reement.
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1. Definitions. In this Agreement, unless the context otherwise requires, the following terms
shall have the following meaning:
"City" is the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
"Project" is the development appreved by City comprised of approximately eighty (80)
to ninety-six (96) senior apartment units, one manager unit, recreational and
common area facilities, parking spaces, and other amenities on the Site.
"Qualified Project Period" means the first day on which the residential units in the
development are first available for occupancy by Qualified Tenants and continuing
for thirty years, except that the limitation that all tenants, occupants and residents by
Qualified Tenants shall continue in perpetuity.
"Qualified Tenants" shall mean persons or households who are at least fifty-five
years or older and are senior citizens as defined in Section 51.3 of the California Civil
Code as amended from time to time.
(i)
"Very Low Income Qualified Tenants" shall mean Qualified Tenants who
possess an income equal to or less than the amounts as specified in
California Health and Safety Code Section 50105, as amended.
J
(ii)
Ordinance No. 624
Page 7 of 19
"Ninety Percent Income Qualified Tenants" means a household whose
annual income does not exceed ninety percent (90%) of the Area Median
Income.
"Area Median Income" as may be used in determining income status or rent
rate herein, shall mean that determined median for the County of San
Bernardino, as set forth in California Health and Safety Code Section 50093,
as amended.
"Affordable Rents" shall mean the total charges for rent, and utilities, to a Very Low
Income Qualified Tenant shall not exceed one-twelfth of thirty percent (30%) of Very
Low Income, adjusted for household size. The total charges for rent, and utilities to
a Ninety Percent Income Qualified Tenant shall not exceed one-twelfth of thirty
percent (30%) of ninety percent (90%) of the Area Median Income, adjusted for
household size. Initial rents for each unit shall be set by the Developer at the time
of initial occupancy of the Development. Rents may be adjusted annually by the
same percentage that income has increased, if any, for a Very Low Income Qualified
Tenant or a Ninety Percent Income Qualified Tenant, based on changes in the Area
Median Income, At least sixty calendar days prior to increasing rents ~n any unit
restricted by this Agreement, the Developer shall submit to the City the Developer's
calculation of such increase. Tenants occupying units restricted by this Agreement
,shall be given at least thirty days written notice prior to any rent increase.
"Effective Date" shall mean the 31 st celendar day following adoption of the ordinance
approving this Agreement by City's City Council.
Recitals. The recitals are part of the agreement between the parties and shall be enforced
and enforceable as any other provision of this Agreement.
Interest of Property Owner. Developer warrants and represents that it has entered into an
escrow or an agreement by which it is to acquire full legal title to the real property of the site
and that it has full legal right to enter into this Agreement.
Bindinq Effect of Aqreement. The Developer hereby subjects the development and the land
described in Exhibit 'W' hereto to the covenants, reservations and restrictions as set forth in
this Agreement. The City and the Developer hereby declare their specific intent that the
covenants, reservations and restrictions as set forth herein shall be deemed covenants
running with the land and shall pass to and be binding' upon the Developer's successors and
Ordinance No. 624
Page 8 of 19
assigns in title or interest to the Development. Each and every contract, deed, Regulatory
Agreements with the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency or other instrument
hereinafter executed, covering or conveying the development or any podion thereof shall
conclusively be held to have been executed, delivered and accepted subject to the
covenants, reservations and restrictions expressed in this Agreement, regardless of whether
such covenants, reservations and restrictions are sel forth in such contract, deed or other
instrument.
City and Developer hereby declare their understanding and intent that the burden of the
covenants, reservations and restrictions set forth herein touch and concern the land in that
the Developer's legal interest in the development is rendered less valuable thereby. The City
and Developer hereby further declare their understanding and intent that the benefit of such
covenants touch and concern the land by enhancing and increasing the enjoyment and use
of the Development by Qualified Tenants, the intended beneficiaries of such covenants,
reservations and restrictions, and by fudhering the public purposes for which this Agreement
is adopted. Further, the parties hereto agree that such covenants, reservations and
restrictions benefit all other real property located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
Relationship of Parties. It is understood that the contractual relationship between City and
Developer is such that Developer is an independent party and is not the agent of City for any
purpose whatsoever and shall not be considered to be the agent of City for any purpose
whatsoever.
Requlatory Aqreement: In addition to the requirements of this Agreement, the Developer
shall comply with all the terms and conditions of the Regulatory Agreement with the
Redevelopment Agency.
Term of Aqreement. The term of the Agreement shall commence on the effective date and
shall expire thirty years after the commencement of the Qualified Project Period, so long as
Developer remains in material compliance with this Agreement, as from time to time
amended. This Agreement shall be deemed to be terminated automatically if Developer
does not obtain a Certificate of Occupancy for the entirety of the Project Within five (5) years
of the effective date.
Restrictions on Rental Units. During the term of this Agreement, all tenants, occupants and
residents shall be Qualified Tenants except for one resident manager. However, it is
expressly understood by the parties hereto that the Project has been specifically designed
to meet the unique needs of senior tenants. Accordingly, even after the expiration of the
10.
11.
12.
13.
Ordinance No. 624
Page 9 of 19
to meet the unique needs of senior tenants. Accordingly, even after the expiration of the
term, the limitation that all tenants, occupants and residents of apartment units in the Project
shall be Qualified Tenants shall remain in perpetuity, unless the Project is made to conform
with all then applicable Development Code provisions pertaining to multi-family dwellings.
Said apartment units shall not be rented, occupied, leased or subleased to occupants who
are not Qualified Tenants except as provided as follows:
A person or persons who is not a Qualified Tenant, but is a "Qualified Permanent
Resident as defined in Civil Code Section 51.3;
A person or persons under fifty-five years of age may occupy apartment units as
temporary tenants for a period of time not to exceed three months during any
calendar year.
Rental Requirements. During the Qualified Project Period at least fody percent (40%) of the
units in the Project, shall be rented, leased or held available for Very Low Income Qualified
Tenants at affordable rents. All remaining units shall be rented, leased or held available for
Ninety Percent Income Qualified Tenants at affordable rents.
Maintenance of Apartments as Rentals. During the term hereof, all apartment units in the
Project shall remain rental units. No apartment unit in thi~ Project shall be eligible for
conversion from rental units to oondominiums, townhomes or any other common interest
subdivision without consent of the City Council.
On-site Manaqero A full-time resident manager shall be provided on the Project site.
Tenant Committee. Residents shall have the right to establish a committee composed of
tenants for the purpose of organizing social activities and providing comments and
suggestions to the Developer regarding the operation and facilities of the Project. Nothing
in this section shall be deemed to restrict the rights of individuals to organize activities and
provide comments to the Developer.
Submission of Materials and Annual Review. Prior to occupancy, the Developer shall submit
to City tenant selection procedures which shall detail the methods which Developer shall use
to advertise the availability of apartments in the Project and screening mechanisms which
Developer intends to use to limit the occupancy of the apartments to Qualified Tenants and
Low Income Qualified Tenants.
Ordinance No. 624
Page 10 of 19
On or before March 15 of each year following the commencement of the Qualified Project
Period, the Developer, or its representative, shall file a certificate of continuing program
compliance with the City. Each such report shall contain such information as City may
require including, but not limited to, the following:
Rent schedules then in effect, including utility charges (if any);
A project occupancy profile;
A description of the physical condition and maintenance procedures for the Project,
including apartment units, landscaping, walkways, and recreational areas.
The report may be combined with, or form a part of. the Annual Report required by the
Redevelopment Agency's Regulatory Agreement as long as it contains the above listed
items.
14.
City shall be allowed to conduct physical inspections of the Project as it shall deem
necessary, provided that said inspections do not unreasonably interfere with the normal
operations of the Project and reasonable notice is provided. The City shall further be allowed
to conduct an annual survey of residents in the Project in order to assess senior needs.
Tenant Selection, Contracts and Rules and Requlations. On receipt of an application for low-
income occupancy, Developer shall determine the eligibility of the occupancy under the terms
of this Development Agreement. Verification of tenant eligibility shall include one or more of
the following factors:
Obtain an income verification form from the Social Security Administration and/or the
Califomia Department of Social Services, if the applicant receives income from either
or both agencies;
Obtain an income tax return for the most recent tax year;
Conduct a TRW or similar financial search;
Obtain an income verification from all current employers; and
If the applicant is unemployed and has no tax return, obtain another form of
independent verification.
Ordinance No. 624
Page 11 of 19
Developer shall be entitled to rely on the information contained in the application sworn to by
the applicant. All agreements for rental of all apartment units in the Project shall be in writing.
The form of proposed rent or lease agreement shall be reviewed and approved by City prior
to the commencement of the Qualified Project Period. Such agreement shall include all rules
and regulations governing tenancy within the Project. The rules and regulations shall include
regulations which specifically authorize the keeping of small pets within all apartment units.
15.
Termination and Eviction of Tenants. A tenancy may be terminated without the termination
being deemed an eviction under the following circumstances;
a. The death of the sole tenant of the unit;
By the tenant at the expiration of the term of occupancy or other wise upon thirty
days' written notice;
c. By abandonment of the premises by the tenant; or
d. By failure of a tenant to execute or renew a lease.
Any termination of a tenancy other than those listed above in this paragraph 14 shall
constitute an eviction. Developer shall only evict in compliance with the provision of
California law and then only for material noncompliance with the terms of the rental
agreement.
16.
Local Residency. Residency preference shall be given where possible and to the extent
permitted by law to applicants to the Project who have been residents of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga. However, that factor shall not be given priority over the other elements of
Qualified Tenant selection as stated herein.
17.
Hazard Insurance. Developer shall keep the Project and all improvements thereon insured
at all times against loss or damage endorsement and such other dsks, perils or coverage as
Developer may determine. During the term hereof, the Project shall be insured as provided
in the Disposition and Development Agreement of the City's Redevelopment Agency.
18.
Maintenance Guarantee. Developer shall comply with all City maintenance standards
enacted from time to time.
19.
Ordinance No. 624
Page 12 of 19
Standards and Restriction Pertaininq to Development of the Real Property. The following
specific restrictions shall apply to the use of the Site pursuant to this Development
Agreement:
d,
Only residential uses of the real property, including provisions of services needed or
desired by the residents, shall be permitted in the Project; and
The final Site Plan and development design shall be subject to a City approved
development review procedure, to be applied for by the owner; and
The maximum density of residential dwelling units in the Project shall never be
greater than 30 dwelling units per acre; and
The maximum height for the highest proposed building in the Project shall be forty-
two (42) feet; and
The maximum size for all the buildings and the proposed square footage for each
of the apartment types located in the Project shall be as set forth in a City approved
development review application; and
The provisions for reservation or dedication of land for public purposes shall be
established through the development review process,
The maximum number of required parking off-street parking spaces shall be subject
to the Development Review process, but shall be no less than .7 parking space per
unit and no less that 1 space for the manager's unit, and
The minimum private open space requirement for ground floor units shall be subject
to the Development Review process, and
The minimum private open space requirement for upper floor units shall be subject
to the Development Review process; and
The minimum number of washeddryer facilities shall be modified from the
Development Code and subject to the Development Review process, but not less
than one washer/dryer for every 14 units; and
77
Ordinance No. 624
Page 13 of 19
The minimum building setback from the drive aisle shall be reduced to an amount
not less than 9 feet; and
20.
21.
Recreational amenities may be duplicated in order to fulfill the total number of
recreational amenities required for the project; and
m. A perimeter wall, if any, shall be subject to the Development Review process.
Project Desiqn Amenities for Senior Citizens. The Project open space, buildings and
individual apartments shall be designed with physical amenities catering to the needs and
desires of the senior citizen residents. In addition to those conditions set forth in the
development review process, following physical amenities shall be substantially included in
the Project, but may be modified by the City during the Development Review process:
a. Elevator service shall be provided to all upper story apartments;
Units shall be designed to comply with the State requirements for disabled access
for multiple family housing;
c. Handrails shall be provided in all hallways;
d. Building space shall be devoted for tenant group meetings; and
Recreational amenities shall be oriented towards senior needs and may include, but
not limited to, lawn bowling, gazebos, and barbecue areas and be subject to the
Development Review process.
Indemnification. Developer agrees to indemnity, defend and hold City and its elected officials,
officers, agents, and employees free and harmless from liability for damage or claims for
damage for personal injuries, including death, and claims for property damage which may
arise from the direct or indirect operations of Developer or those of its contractor,
subcontractor, agent, employee or other person acting on its behalf which relate to the
Project. Developer agrees to indemnify and shall defend City and it s elected officials,
officers, agents, and employees with respect to actions for damages caused or alleged to
have been caused by reason of Developer's activities in connection with the Project with a
counsel reasonably satisfactory to the City. This indemnification provision applies to all
damages and claims the operations referred to in this Development Agreement regardless
of whether or not the City prepared, supplied or approved the plans, specifications or other
22.
Ordinance No. 624
Page 14 of 19
documents for the Project. Notwithstanding the foregoing, this provision shall not apply to
any such claims which arise out of, or by reason of, the gross negligence or willful
misconduct of the City, its elected officials, agents and employees.
Non-Liability of Aqency Officials, Employees, and Aqents. No member, official, employee,
or agent of the City shall be personally liable to the Developer or any permitted successor-in-
interest oi' the Developer in the event of default or breach by the City or the Rancho
Cucamonga Redevelopmerit Agency under this agreement or for any amount which may
become due to the Developer, its successors or under any obligation under the terms of this
Agreement.
23.
24.
25.
26.
Amendments. This Agreement may be amended or canceled, in whole or in pad, only by
mutual written consent of the parties and then in the manner provided for in California
Government Code Section 65868 et seq.
Federal, State Preemption: As provided in State Govemment Code Section 65869.5, where
state or federal laws or regulations enacted after this Development Agreement has been
entered into prevent or preclude compliance with the provisions of the Development
Agreement, such provisions shall be modified or suspended as may be necessary to comply
with such State or federal laws or regulations.
Administrative Modifications: Minor conflicts resulting from the strict interpretation of this
Agreement with the application of the City's development regulations may be modified
administratively by the City Planner.
Enforcement. In the event of a default under the provisions of this Agreement by Developer,
City shall give written notice to Developer (or its successor) at the address of the Project, and
by registered or cedified mail addressed to the address stated in this Agreement, and if such
violation is not corrected to the reasonable satisfaction of City within thirty days after such
notice is given, or if not corrected within such reasonable time as may be required to cure the
breach or default if said breach or default cannot be cured within thirty days (provided that
acts to cure the breach or default must be commenced within said thirty days and must
thereafter be diligently pursued by Developer), then City may, without fur,her notice, declare
a default under this Agreement and, upon any such declaration of default, City may bring any
action necessary to specifically enforce the obligations of Developer growing out of the
operation of this Development Agreement, apply to any court, state or federal, for injunctive
relief against any violation by Developer of any provision of this Agreement or apply for such
other relief as may be appropriate.
Ordinance No. 624
Page 15of19
After completion of the Project pursuant to the terms of this Agreement, any default may
alternatively be enforced as any normal violation of the standards and provisions of the
Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. Accordingly, the following penalty is specifically
included as pad of this Agreement:
27.
"It shall be unlawful for any person, firm, partnership, or corporation to
violate any provision or to fail to comply with any of the requirements of this
Agreement. Any person, firm, partnership, or corporation violating any
provision of this Agreement by failing to comply with any of its requirements
shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall
be punished by a fine not exceeding One Thousand Dollars or by
imprisonment not exceeding six months, or by both such fine and
imprisonment. Each such person, firm, partnership or corporation shall be
deemed guilty of a separate offense for each and every day or any portion
thereof during which any violation of any of the provisions of this Agreement
is committed, continued or permitted by such person, firm, partnership or
corporation, and shall be punishable therefore as herain.'"
Event of Default. Developer is in default under this Agreement upon the happening of one
or more of the following events or conditions:
If a material warranty, representation or statement is made or furnished by Developer
· to City and is false or proved to have been knowingly false in any material respect
when it was made;
If a finding and determination is made by City following an annual review pursuant
to paragraph 13 herein above, upon the basis of substantial evidence that Developer
has not complied in good faith with any material terms and conditions of this
Agreement, after notice and opportunity to cure as described in paragraph 34 heroin
above; or
28.
A breach by Developer of any of the provisions or terms of this Agreement, after
notice and opportunity to cure as provided in paragraph 34 heroin above.
No Waiver of Remedies. City does not waive any claim of defect in performance by
Developer if on periodic review City does not enforce or terminate this Agreement.
Nonpe~ormance by Developer shall not be excused because performance by Developer of
the obligations heroin contained would be unprofitable, difficult or expensive or because of
Ordinance No. 624
Page 16of19
a failure of any third party or entity, other than City. All other remedies at law or in equity
which are not otherwise provided for in this Agreement or in City's regulations governing
development agreements are available to the parties to pursue in the event that there is a
breach of this Development Agreement. No waiver by City of any breach or default under this
Development Agreement shall be deemed to be a waiver of any other subsequent breach
thereof or default hereunder.
29.
Riclhts of Lenders Under this Aqreement. Should Developer place or cause to be placed any
encumbrance or lien on the project, or any part thereof, the beneficiary ("Lender") of said
encumbrance or lien, including, but not limited to, roodgages, shall have the right at any time
during the term of this Agreement and the existence of said encumbrance or lien to:
Do any act or thing required of Developer under this Agreement, and any such act
or thing done or performed by Lender shall be as effective as if done by Developer
itself;
Realize on the security afforded by the encumbrance or lien by exercising foreclosure
proceedings or power of sale or other remedy afforded in law or in equity or by the
security document evidencing the encumbrance or lien thereinafter referred to as
"the trust deed");
Transfer, convey or assign the title of Developer to the Project to any purchaser at
any foreclosure sale, whether the foreclosure sale be conducted pursuant to court
order or pursuant to a power of sale contained in a trust deed; and
Acquire and succeed to the interest of Developer by vidue of any foreclosure sale,
whether the foreclosure sale be conducted pursuant to a court order or pursuant to
a power of sale contained in a trust deed.
The City agrees that the terms of this Agreement are subordinate to any such financing
instrument and shall execute from time to time any and all documentation reasonably
requested by Developer or Lender to effect such subordination.
30.
Notice to Lender. City shall give written notice of any default or breach under this Agreement
by Developer to Lender and afford Lender the oppodunity after service of the notice to:
Cure the breach or default within sixty days after service of said notice, where the
default can be cured by the payment of money;
31.
Ordinance No. 624
Page 17 of 19
Cure the breach or default within sixty days after service of said notice, where the
breach or default can be cured by something other than the payment of money and
can be cured within that tim. e; or
Cure the breach or default in such reasonable time as may be required where
something other than payment of money is required to cure the breach or default and
cannot be performed within sixty days after said notice, provided that acts to cure the
breach or default are commenced within a sixty day period after service of said
notice of default on Lender by City and are thereafter diligently continued by Lender.
Action by Lender. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, a Lender may
forestall any action by City for a breach or default under the terms of this Agreement by
Developer by commencing proceedings to foreclose its encumbrance or lien on the Project.
The proceedings so commenced may be for foreclosure of the encumbrance by order of
court or for foreclosure of the encumbrance under a power of sale contained in the
instrument creating the encumbrance or lien. The proceedings shall not, however, forestall
any such action by the City for the default or breach by Developer unless:
They are commenced within sixty days after service on Lender of the notice
described herein above;
b. They are, after having been commenced, diligently pursued in the manner required
· by law to completion; and
32°
33.
Lender keeps and performs all of the terms, covenants and conditions of this
Agreement requiring the payment or expenditure of money by Developer until the
foreclosure proceedings are complete or are discharged by redemption, satisfaction
or payment.
Rent Control. In consideration for the limitations herein provided, City agrees that it shall not,
during the term of this Agreement, take any action, the effect of which will be to control,
determine or affect the rents for those low income rental units located in the Project, except
as otherwise provided in this Agreement.
Notice. Any notice required to be given by the terms of this Agreement shall be provided by
certified mail, return receipt requested, at the address of the respective parties as specified
below or at any other such address as may be later specified by the padies hereto.
34.
35.
36.
Developer:
City:
Ordinance No. 624
Page 18 of 19
Nacho Gracia, Executive Director
Northtown Housing Development Corporation
9999 Feron Boulevard #A
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
City of Rancho Cucamonga
10500 Civic Center Drive
P.O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Attorne¥'s Fees. In any proceedings arising from the enforcement of this Development
Agreement or because of an alleged breach or default hereunder, the prevailing party shall
be entitled to recover its costs and its reasonable attorneys' fees incurred during the
proceeding as may be fixed within the discretion of the court.
Bindincl Effect. This agreement shall bind, and the benefits and burdens hereof shall inure
to, the respective parties hereto and their legal representatives, executors, administrators,
successors, and assigns, wherever the context requires or admits.
Applicable Law. This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the
laws of the State of California.
37.
3&
Partial Invalidity. If any provisions of this Agreement shall be deemed to be invalid, illegal or
unenforceable, the validity, legality or enforceability of the remaining provisions hereof shall
not in any way be affected or impaired thereby.
Recordation. This Agreement shall, at the expense of Developer, be recorded in the Official
Records of the County Recorder of the County of San Bernardino.
Ordinance No. 624
Page 19 of 19
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been executed by the parties and shall be
effective on the effective date set forth herein above.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Dated: By
William J. Alexander, Mayor
NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORP.
Dated: By
Nacho Gracia, Executive Director
ORDINANCE NO. 626
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 00-01, TO ESTABLISH
MIXED USE DISTRICTS, WITH ACCOMPANYING
DEFINITIONS, PROCESSING PROVISIONS, AND
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS BY AMENDING SECTIONS
17.06.010.C.1, 17.08.020, 17.08.030 AND 17.08.040.A OF THE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA DEVELOPMENT CODE, AND
MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF.
RECITALS.
1. On May 24, and continued to June 14, 2000, the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly-noticed public hearing with
respect to the above-referenced Development Code Amendment and,
following the conclusion thereof, adopted its Resolution No. 00-56,
recommending that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopt
said amendment.
2. On June 21, 2000, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted and concluded a duly-noticed public hearing concerning the
subject amendment to the Development Code.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.
B. ORDINANCE.
follows:
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby ordain as
SECTION 1: This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts
set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and
correct.
SECTION 2:
This City Council hereby finds and determines that the subject
amendment identified in this Ordinance is exempt from the
requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of
1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated
thereunder, pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of Chapter 3 of
Division 6 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations.
SECTION 3: The following sections hereby are amended to read, in words
and figures, as written below:
Ordianance No. 626
Page 2 of 4
The following shall be added as Section 17.06.010.C.1 .h to the Land
Development section of the Development Code:
"h. All projects within Mixed Used Districts."
The following shall be added as Section 17.08.020.G to the Residential
section of the Development Code:
"G. Mixed Use (MU~. This district is intended as an area for a
mix of residential and non-residential uses, with site
development regulations that assure development
compatible with nearby lower density residential
development, as well as internal compatibility among the
varying uses. Each location of this district is identified in
Section 17.08.030F with percent ranges for each permitted
use that is identified. Each use that is so identified is
identical to the use definition listed elsewhere in the
Development Code.'
3. The following shall be added as Section 17.08.030.F to the
residential section of the Development Code:
"F. Mixed Use Districts - These districts have been created
to implement the goals, objectives, and land use
designations of the General Plan. Each location where a
Mixed Use District is established will have the specific land
uses that may be authorized for development listed in this
section. '
4.The following shall be added as Section 17.08.040.A.3 to the
residential section of the Development Code:
"3. Mixed Use Develol3ment Standards. For the purposes
of establishing guidance for the application of individual
land use regulations and development standards, all Mixed
Use District development proposals are subject to master
planning procedures as outlined in Section 17.20.030.
Existing development standards for each land use
category, as provided in Sections 17.08 through 17.24,
shaft be the basis of standards for each category within a
mixed use development plan, but they may be modified by
the City during the Master Plan review process.
Development agreements between the property owners
and the City may be used as implementation measures for
any amended standards or review procedures. '
SECTION 4:
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word
of this Ordinance is, for any reason, deemed or held to be
invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any coud of
Ordinance No. 626
Page 3 of 4
competent jurisdiction, or preempted by legislative enactment,
such decision or legislation shall not affect the validity of the
remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby declares that it would have
adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection,
sentence, clause, phrase, or work thereof, regardless of the
fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences,
clauses, phrases, or words might subsequently be declared
invalid or unconstitutional or preempted by subsequent
legislation.
SECTION 5:
The City Clerk shall cedify to the adoption of this Ordinance
and shall cause the same to be published within 15 days after
its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin a
newspaper of general circulation published in the City of
Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, California.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 5th day of July.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAINED:
William J. Alexander, Mayor
ATTEST:
Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk
Ordinance No. 626
Page 4 of 4
I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of
the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 21't day of June 2000, and was
passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the
5th day of July 2000.
Executed this 6th day of July 2000, at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk
ORDINANCE NO. 558-D
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER
3.48 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE
PERTAINING TO UTILITY USER'S FEES.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows:
SECTION t:
Section 3.48.035.A of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal
Code is hereby amended to read, in words and figures, as
follows:
The maximum aggregate amount of the fees
imposed by this chapter upon any one service user
for utilities during any calendar year shall not
exceed Twenty-Two Thousand, One Hundred 3nd
Seventy Dollars ($22,170.00) Seventeen
Thousand, Five-Hundred and Ninety Dollars
($17,590)."
SECTION 2:
Section 3.48.040.A of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal
Code is hereby amended to read, in words and figures, as
follows:
There is imposed a fee on the amounts paid for any
intrastate telephone services by every person in the
City using such services. The fee imposed by this
section shall be at the rate of 3.08 percent (3.08%)
2.46 percent (2.46%) of the charges made for such
services, and shall be paid by the person paying for
such services."
SECTION3: Section3.48.050.AoftheRanchoCucamonga
Municipal Code is hereby amended to read, in words
and figures, as follows:
"A. There is imposed a fee upon every person using
electrical energy in the City. The fee imposed by
this section shall be at the rate of 3.08 percent
~,~ n~o/A~ 2.46 percent (2.46%) of the charges
made for such energy by an electrical corporation
providing service in the City and shall be paid by
the person using the energy. The fee applicable to
electrical energy provided by a non-utility supplier
shall be determined by applying the fee rate to the
Ordinance No. 558D
Page 2 of 5
equivalent charge the service user would have
incurred if the energy used had been provided by
the electrical corporation franchised by the City.
Non-utility suppliers shall install and maintain an
appropriate utility-type metering system which will
enable compliance with this section. 'Charges,' as
used in this section, means charges made for: (1)
metered energy and (2) minimum charges for
service, including customer charges, service
charges, demand charges, standby charges, and all
other annual and monthly charges, fuel or other
cost adjustments authorized by the California Public
Utilities Commission or the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission."
SECTION 4:
Section 3.48.060.A.1 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal
Code is hereby amended to read, in words and figures, as
follows:
"A.1. There is imposed a fee upon every person in the
City, other than a gas corporation or electrical
corporation, using gas in the City which is
transported through mains or pipes or by mobile
transport. The fee imposed by this section shall be
at the rate of 3.08 percent (3.08%) 2.46 percent
(2.46%) of the charges made for the gas and shall
be paid by the person using the gas. The fee
applicable to gas or gas transportation provided by
non-utility suppliers shall be determined by applying
the fee rate to the equivalent charges the service
user would have incurred if the gas or gas
transportation had been provided by the gas
corporation franchised by the City."
SECTION 5:
Section 3.48.070.A of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal
Code is hereby amended to read, in words and figures, as
follows:
There is imposed a fee upon every person in the
city using water which is delivered through mains or
pipes. The fee imposed by this section shall be at
the rate of 3.08 percent (3.08%) 2.46 percent
(2.46%) of the charges made for such water and
shall be paid by the person paying for such water."
Ordinance No. 558D
Page 3 of 5
SECTION 6:
Section 3.48.140 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code
is hereby amended to read, in words and figures, as follows:
"A. Whenever the calculation of the amount of any fee
due and owing under this chapter is alleged to have
resulted in an overpayment or a payment more than
once, it may be refunded by the Finance Director as
provided in subsections "B" and "C" of this section,
provided a claim in writing therefore, stating under
penalty of perjury the specific grounds upon which
the claim is founded, is filed with the Finance
Director within one year of the date of the claimed
overpayment. The claim shall be on forms
furnished by the Finance Director.
"B. A service supplier may claim a refund or take as
credit against fees collected and remitted an
amount overpaid or paid more than once when it is
established that the person from whom the fee has
been collected did not owe the fee.
"C. Any service user may obtain a refund of fees
overpaid or paid more than once by filing a claim in
the manner provided in subsection "A" of this
section, but only when the service user having paid
the fee to the service supplier establishes to the
satisfaction of the Finance Director that the service
user has been unable to obtain a refund from the
service supplier who collected the fee."
"D. Notwithstanding other provisions of this section,
whenever a service supplier, pursuant to an order
of the California Public Utilities Commission or a
court of competent jurisdiction, makes a refund to
service users of charges for past utility services, the
fees paid pursuant to this chapter on the amount of
such refunded charges shall also be entitled to
claim a credit for such refunded fees against the
amount of fee which is due upon the next monthly
returns. In the event this chapter is repealed, the
amounts of any refundable fees will be borne by the
City."
SECTION 7: This Ordinance shall be deemed effective on August 31,
!999 August 3'1, 2000.
Ordinance No. 558D
Page 4 of 5
SECTION 8:
If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence,
clause or phrase of this Ordinance or any part thereof, is for
any reason held to be unconstitutional or preempted by
subsequent legislation, such decision or legislation shall not
effect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance
or any part thereof. The City Council hereby declares that it
would have passed each section, subsection, subdivision,
paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, irrespective
of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections,
subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases are
declared unconstitutional or preempted.
SECTION 9:
The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance
and shall cause the same to be published in the manner
prescribed by law.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 5th day of July.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAINED:
William J. Alexander, Mayor
ATTEST:
Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk
Ordinance No. 558D
Page 5 of 5
I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERKof the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting efthe Council of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 21 stday of June 2000, and was passed at a regular meeting
of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 5th day of July 2000.
Executed this 6t~ day of July 2000, at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk
the city of
Rancho Cucamonga
Staff Report
DATE: July 5, 2000
TO:
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM:
Dan Coleman, Acting City Planner
BY:
Brent Le Count, AICP, Associate Planner
SUBJECT:
APPEAL OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 99-72 - RYLAND HOMES - The appeal of the
Planning Commission's approval of the design review of building elevations and detailed
site plan for 78 homes within Tentative Tracts 15911 and 15912 in the Low-Medium
Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on
the southwest and northeast corners of East Avenue and the Southern Pacific Railroad
right-of-way - APN: 227-131-05 and 227-141-11 and 12. Related File: Variance 99-11.
APPEAL OF VARIANCE 99-11 - RYLAND HOMES - The appeal of the Planning
Commission's approval of a request to construct perimeter tract walls up to approximately
21 feet high where a maximum height. of 6 feet is permitted for freeway noise mitigation
purposes for Tracts 15911 and 15912 in the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling
units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the southwest and northeast
corners of East Avenue and the Southern Pacific right-of-way- APN: 227-131-05 and
227-141-11 and 12. Related Files: Development Review 99-72, Tentative Tract 15911
and 15912.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the City Council review the available information attached and deny the appeal by
adoption of the attached Resolutions of Denial.
BACKGROUND:
The City Council considered the subject appeal at the June 7, 2000, meeting. The public hearing was
continued to provide staff and the applicant time to obtain confirmation from CALTRANS regarding whether
or not the developer would be able to construct a sound wall within the I-15 Freeway right-of-way. The City
Council again considered the appeal at the June 21,2000, meeting and continued that meeting at the request
of Ryland Homes.
T H E C I T Y O F
[~ANCHO CUCAHONGA
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
July 5, 2000
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
Gall Sanchez, Planning Commission Secretary C"~''~/
CORRECTION TO CITY COUNCIL AGENDA, ITEM F.1 - JULY 5, 2000
Please insert the attached page (No.
inadvertently omitted.
Thank you.
94-A) to your agenda packet,
which was
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DR 99-72 AND VAR 99-11 - RYLAND HOMES
July 5, 2000
Page 2
CALTRANS DETERMINATION:
Caltrans will not allow the developer to locate the sound wall along the 1-15 shoulder. Caltrans policy is to
only entertain allowing sound walls on the shoulder if there are no other practical solutions available. In this
case, CALTRANS has reviewed the acoustical analysis for the project and ascertained that there is an on-
site solution to mitigate freeway noise, namely provision of the 21 foot high sound wall within the subdivision
as approved by the Planning Commission. Furthermore, CALTRANS has long range plans to widenthe I-15
freeway and the wall would only complicate this future widening; whereas, an on-site wall would not be
affected. See the attached memo from Tony Louka, Senior Transportation Engineer with CALTRANS for
further details.
Dan Coleman
Acting City Planner
DC:BLC\Is
Attachments:
Exhibit "A" - CALTRANS Memorandum
Exhibit "B" - City Council Staff Report dated June 21, 2000
Resolution to Deny Appeal for Development Review 99-72
Resolution to Deny Appeal for Variance 99-11
Sent By: CALTRANS; 909 383 5975; Jun-28-O0 17:29; Page 2/2
STATE Of C,a~NE88, 'rlt, e/i~pORTAl10N ~ ~ AGE/~
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
464 W, FOURTH STREET
,'BAN BERN/~RC~INQ, CA 9'2401-1400
PHONE (909) 38,1-6365
FAX (900) 383-5975
June 29, 2000
Mr. Brent Le Count
City of Rarmho Cucamonga
105OOC~cCenterDrive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
08,qbd-l~7.44
0~332-987906
Ref: Tract # 15911
This is to infon~ you that Calftans is not willing to allow We consb'udion of the proposed noise barrier at the edge of
shoulderof the freeway. This is because Ihe 17-footproperty line soundwzi proposed by the developer in his preliminary
noise study intemecls ~he line of sight between the buck slack and the raceivy. The tuck stack is assumed ~ be tl .5
fed above the pavemeaL and ~e receiver assumed to be 5 teet above the finished grade Of lot t6. Also Ihe proposed
soundwall provides 10 decibels noise reduclion which is above the 5 decibds required to prove the feasibffity of the noise
barrier. The above is Irue assuming the final fades stay the same.
Calb'ans is also presenily condu~d ng a study to peserve Right of Way for future expansion along the porEon of Route 15
adjacenl to ihe proposed development. The c0nslnjcEon of be noise banis* at ~e edge Of Shoulder limits ~e use Of the
preserved Right of Way.
I hope thLs clarifies our posilion, if you have further ques6ons please fed free to ~ me at (909) 383-6365.
Sincerely
Tony Louka
Chief Office of Environmental Engineering
the
Rancho
city of
Cucamonga
S' ffReport
DAT~:
June 21,2000
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
Bred Buller, City Planner
BY:
Brent Le Count, AICP, Associate Planner
APPEAL OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 99-72 - RYLAND HOMES - The appeal of the
Planning Commission's approval of the design review of building elevations and detailed
site plan for 78 homes within Tentative Trects 15911 and 15912 in the Low-Medium
Residential Distdct (4-8 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on
the southwest and northeast corners of East Avenue and the Southern Pacific Railroad
right-of-way- APN: 227-131-05 and 227-141-11 and 12. Related File: Vadance 99-11.
APPEAL OF VARIANCE 99-11 - RYLAND HOMES - The appeal of the Planning
Commission's approval of a request to construct perimeter tract walls up to approximately
21 feet high where a maximum height of 6 feet is permitted for freeway noise mitigation
purposes for Tracts 15911 and 15912 in the Low-Medium Residential Distdct (4-8 dwelling
units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the southwest and northeast
comers of East Avenue and the Southern Pacific right-of-way - APN: 227-131-05 and
227-141-11 and 12. Related Files: Development Review 99-72, Tentative Trect 15911 and
15912.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the City Council review the available information attached and either deny the appeal by
adoption of the attached Resolutions of Denial or continue the item until further information is available to
determine the alternative placement and design of the proposed wall along the I-15 Freeway.
BACKGROUND:
The City Council considered the subject appeal at the June 7, 2000, meeting. The public hearing was
continued to provide staff and the applicant time to Obtain confirmation from CALTRANS regarding whether or
not the developer would be able to construct a sound wall within the CALTRANS 1-15 Freeway dghbof-way.
Staff has had conversations with Tony Louka, Senior Transportation Engineer with CALTRANS. Mr. Louka
has provided written confirmation that CALTRANS will cooperate with the developer and allow the wall within
their right-of-way (see Exhibit 'W'). According to Mr. Louka, CALTRANS is currently studying a widening
concept for the I-15 Freeway but the actual widening would not take place for approximately ten years. The
widening would obviously necessitate demolition of any wall Ryland was to build along the I-15 shoulder but
CALTRANS would re-install a sound wall after the widening occurs to protect the homes.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DR 99-72 AND VAR 99-11 - RYLAND HOMES
June 21,2000
Page 2
The developer is in the process of generating an acoustical analysis to determine the necessary height and
length of the wall if located on the 1-15 shoulder and to obtain their own confirmation of CALTRANS
willingness to cooperate but none of this information is ready yet. If this information becomes available in
time, staff will present it to the City Council at the June 21, 2000 meeting.
It should be noted that the visual impact of a sound wall located along the shoulder of the I-15 Freeway would
likely be far greater than the 21 foot high wall as proposed by the developer and approved by the Planning
Commission. The I-15 is elevated twenty some odd feet above the level of the site so the sound wall would be
elevated as well. Furthermore, the height and length of the wall is yet to be determined but may well exceed
six feet high and longer than the frontage of the site in order to provide sufficient noise mitigation. It would be
highly visible from both the freeway and the surrounding vicinity. The wall as proposed/approved on site
would be hidden behind future homes to be built within the tract, minimized against the background of the I-15
slope embankment, and only extend along the frontage of the site. In case the City Council wishes to take
action on the item consistent with staffs original recommendation, resolutions of denial are attached.
Respectfully submitted,
City Planner
BB:BLC\Is
AttachmentS:
Exhibit "A" - Fax from CALTRANS
Exhibit "B" - Location Map
Exhibit "C" - City Council Staff Report dated June 7, 2000
Resolution to Deny Appeal for Development Review 99-72
Resolution to Deny Appeal for Variance 99-11
Sent By: CALTRANS~ 909 383 5975; Jun~14-O0 14;31;
.......... ,~,~,,.~u~. bUM U~:V; 6-13- 0 11:54AM: 9094772847 ~> OOO 8E~ 5975~
Page 1/1
#1/1
City of Rancho
Cucamon,qa Planning
Oivision
1.~ Tony L~u~a - CALT~N5 F~m: Bran[ Le C~nt
FaX~ 383-5975 Plies: 1
x Please Relely
Tony:
Thanks for your phone calJ yesterday indiCating that you nave mv ew~d R)qanffsplans ~iSlted the lie.
and concluded that CAL'i"FiANS ,~dll be ',~illing ~ itcCep( ~ 80hild nliligaliOn wtl WiInln ~S right-o~-way
oil tile I- 15, This maeef will be considered i0y our City Coui1CII nal~t Mq,'~rk ~{~ it if, ImpEfath/e thai ) get
s0rnechlng in wrffing from you to document your detern'~natiDn, If ~U firldlh~ wording acceptable,
please sign the statement below to confirm ~e~t CALTRANS will allow Ryland to build a soand wall
within the I- 15 right of way and fax this back t~ me at 477-2847, if Ihe Wordblg is not acceptat)le, please
I have reviewed Ryland's pr~jcct and visited the 9to CALTRAN$ witZ a~low Ryid I Iomes to huikJ ~
· '~und w~ll within the I-15 Freeway figh{-o~-w~y to mitigate f'mew~y noise ~ Ryi~cl'a 1tact Rylend's
weft wilt be subjed to CALTRANS permit review protaGS Ihrough fl~ PerTnits Depar~nl.
II
TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 15911
SITE UTLIZATION AND
MASTER CIRCULA'TION PLAN
the
oity of
Cucamonga
S Repor
DATE:
June 7, 2000
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
Brad Buller, City Planner
BY:
Brent Le Count, AICP, Associate Planner
APPEAL OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 99-72 - RYLAND HOMES - The appeal of the
Planning Commission's approval of the design review of building elevations and detailed
site plan for 78 homes within Tentative Tracts 15911 and 15912 in the Low-Medium
Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on
the southwest and northeast comers of East Avenue and the Southern Pacific Railroad
right-of-way - APN: 227-131-05 and 227-141-11 and 12. Related File: Variance 99-11.
APPEAL OF VARIANCE 99-11 - RYLAND HOMES - The appeal of the Planning
Commission's approval of a request to construct perimeter tract walls up to approximately
21 feet high where a maximum height of 6 feet is permitted for freeway noise mitigation
purposes for Tracts 15911 and 15912 in the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling
units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the southwest and northeast
comers of East Avenue and the Southern Pacific right-of-way - APN: 227-131-05 and
227-141-11 and 12. Related Files: Development Review 99-72, Tentative Tract 15911 and
15912.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council deny the appeal filed in opposition to the project and uphold the
decision of the Planning Commission appreving the development review and variance applications.
BACKGROUND:
The Planning Commission approved Tentative Tracts 15911 and 15912 on October 14, 1998. The tracts are
located on both sides of East Avenue, north and south of the abandoned Southern Pacific
right-of-way. A noise study was conducted d uri ng review of the tracts to ascertain noise impacts from the I-15
Freeway on the home sites and identify mitigation methods. The study recommended construction of
masonry walls as high as 17 feet above pad level to mitigate freeway noise (which would result in a 21-foot
high wall on the high side). The highest walls would be located adjacent to the freeway 1,000 feet from the
East Avenue frontage. The high wall is necessary because the I-15 Freeway is approximately 20 feet higher
/ z z3
CITYCOUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DR 99-72 AND VAR 99-11 - RYLAND HOMES
June 7,2000
Page 2
than the elevation of the project site (see Exhibit "B"). The tracts are designed in conformance with the wall
height requirements. On Apdl 12, 2000, the Planning Commission approved Development Review 99-72 for
the design review of homes within the two tracts. The Commission also approved Vadance 99-11 to allow the
developer to construct sound walls as high as 21 feet.
The subject appeal was filed in a timely fashion by James Banks on April 24, 2000.
ANALYSIS:
Mr. Banks poses the following points in his appeal:
"A buffer zone could be [provided along the I-15 frontage] filled with tall berms, shrubs and trees which
would act as a sound absorbent while adding to the beauty of the project and the community and
providing an environmental benefit with vegetation."
Response: Provision of tall, landscaped berms would certainly have aesthetic value, but there is no evidence
that it would provide adequate noise attenuation for future homeowners. While plants may provide a
perception of less noise, acoustic studies have proven that they do not reduce actual noise levels. The
applicant's noise consultant has studied the situation and determined that with a 6-foot high wall at the
eastern boundary of the project, homes would have to be set back 1,000 feet from the 1-15 Freeway to
achieve acceptable noise levels. This would effectively preclude development of the site in conformance with
permitted land uses. Furthermore, according to the noise consultant, trees and vegetation provide little, if
any, sound attenuation.
The Etiwanda Specific Plan does contain provisions for increasing density in exchange for open space under
the Optional Standards. The developer chose a lower density, more consistentwith the neighborhood, using
the Basic Development Standards; hence, the lots are larger, but there is no common open space.
According to CALTRANS, it would be possible for the developer to construct a sound wall within the 1-15
Freeway right-of-way. A 6-foot wall on top of the freeway slope would offer superior sound attenuation (see
Exhibit "B"); however, the developer does not wish to construct a wall within the freeway right-of-way because
it would have to be much longer than the actual project frontage on the freeway in order to effectively mitigate
noise.
2. "People who live near the wall are not going to see the sunshine until 10:00 am."
Response: The freeway itself will block early morning light because it is higher than the top of the proposed
sound wall.
"It will be an engineedng feat to design and build a structure 17 feet high and 8 inches thick which will
withstand the force of [our local high] winds...the wall will be so dgid that the next big dpple from the
San Andreas Fault will lay it on the ground."
Response: The sound wall must be specially engineered in order to meet Uniform Building Code standards.
"The wall will be aesthetically contrary to everything the Etiwanda Specific Plan tded to accomplish in
terms of rural appearance...and the wall will become a precedent."
Response: The highest portion of the wall is located along the I-15 Freeway frontage, approximately 1,000
feet from East Avenue. Due to the steep freeway slope, the wall will be difficult to see from the freeway. The
Planning Commission cenditioned the developer to provide a two-toned color scheme for the high walls to
/D/
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DR 99-72 AND VAR 99-11 - RYLAND HOMES
June 7, 2000
Page 3
help reduce the apparent height of the walls. This technique has been successfully used on similar sound
walls along the south side of Highland Avenue at Milliken Avenue. The walls are designed with split faced
and fluted split faced block, and vine pockets to allow vines to grow up the outside of the walls. The walls are
necessary to permit reasonable development of the project site in cenformance with the land use permitted by
the Etiwanda Specific Plan and are designed to be as aesthetically pleasing as possible. The vast majodly of
residential land use districts within Etiwanda that have frontage on the freeway are designated Low-Medium
Residential (4 to 8 dwelling units per acre) and Medium Residential (8 to 14 dwelling units per acre).
Development within these districts will very likely require a form of sound attenuation similar to that proposed
for the subject development.
ALTERNATIVES:
Require the developer to install the wall at the top of the slope within the 1-15 Freeway right--of-way;
however, it would be contrary to the appellant's desire for light and openness. Uphold the appeal.
Require the developer to install trees along the homeowner's side of wall to soften appearance.
(Current design has shrubs and vines only). Deny the appeal and add a condition.
CORRESPONDENCE:
This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was
posted, and notices were mailed to all properly owners within a 300-foot radius of the project site.
City Planner
BB:BLC\ma
Attachments:
Exhibit "A" - Appellant's Letter dated Apdl 24, 2000
Exhibit "B" - Sound Wall Cross Section
Exhibit "C" - Developer's Letters dated May 2, 11,22, and 31, 2000
Exhibit "D" - Planning Commission Staff Report dated April 12, 2000
Exhibit "E" - Planning Commission Resolution 00-31
Exhibit "F" - Planning Commission Resolution 00-32
Exhibit "G" - Planning Commission Minutes dated Apdl 12, 2000
Resolution to Deny Appeal for Development Review 99-72
Resolution to Deny Appeal for Vadance 99-11
10788 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
April 21, 2000
C~iWCouncil City Clerk
City ofRancho Cucamonga
P.O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91729
RE: Variance 99-11, Ryland Homes
Dear City Council:
I live at 13181 Victoria Street, E~wanda. I am appealing the decision of the
Planning Commission made Wednesday, April 12, 2000. I was
unexpectedly unable to attend the Planning Commission meeting, so I must
resort to this method of making my objections known. My check for $126 is
enclosed.
The Citizens Committee which worked on the Etiwanda Specific Plan
devoted a si~ificant amount of time to the question of planning around the
1-15 fleeway. The Committee was very concerned about the construction of
houses near the fleeway. One of the Committee's proposals was to put a
frontage road along the fleeway route. When that proposal seemed unlikely
to pass, the Committee mined its attention to other solutions.
The Committee allowed higher densities along the tieeway and provided
exceptional set-back and wider open space trade off requirements to address
the conflict between residences and the fleeway. The Committee's theory
was to allow a developer to leave morn space between the houses and the
fleeway and pick up the house count with a little more density away from
the fleeway.
The Committee attempted to create an ordinance which would allow the
developer the same number of houses as other nearby areas of Etiwanda, but
bunch the houses away from the freeway. This method would have left a
buffer zone between the houses and the tieeway. The buffer zone could be
City Council
City Clerk
April 21, 2000
Page 2
filled with tall berms, shrubs and trees which would act as a sound absorbent
while adding to the beauty of the projed and the community and providing
an environmental benefit with vegetation.
Lush vegetation can effectively absorb sound. Ryland's tree removal has, in
fact, doubled the noise of the fleeway where I reside several hundred feet
away. The proposed wall will reflect the sound, not absorb it.
People who live near the wall are not going to see the sunshine until 10:00
A.M.
Every ten years or so the wind blows over 100 mph in Etiwanda. It will be
an engineering feat to design and build a structure 17 feet high and 8 inches
thick which will withstand the force of this w'md. fithat feat can be
accomplished, the wall will be so rigid that the next big ripple tiom the San
Andreas Fault will lay it on the. ground.
The wall will be aesthetically contrary to everything the Etiwanda Specific
Plan tried to accomplish in terms of a rural appearance. ffthis wall becomes
a precedent which is followed elsewhere, the main purposes of the Etiwanda
Specific Plan will be frustrated if not totally thwarted. Please weigh the
arguments for and against the wall, consider the alternatives and make a
jud~mnent which will benefit the community in the long run. Thank you for
considering my appeal.
Sincerel
JBJ/tlm
Enclosure: Check
Tract 15911
RYLAND HOMES
~A
EAST AVK WALL ELEVATION
LANDSCAPE SECTIONS
AND ELEVATIONS
Garcia, Carlos
Full Name:
Job Title:
Company:
Business Address:
Business:
Brent Le Count
City Planner
City HalI-Rancho Cucamonga
10500 Civic Center Drive
1st Floor-Planning Department
Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91730
(909) 477-2700
Brent,
Here are Ryland's response to the appeal and letter regarding our project. I will have more plans ready in a few days and
have a colored version for the city council meeting. In the meantime, I believe you saw the enclosed picture. Call me with
any questions. Thanks.
P.S. Email me at cgarcia@ryland.com. That is good form of communication. Take care.
Carlos 5/2/00
RECEIVED
MAY ~. 8 ZOO0
City af Rancho CucarnonC -- Division
(-
Mestre Greve Associates
May 11, 2000
RECEIVED
MMI? O
BY:
Mr. Carlos Garcia
Ryland Homes
15373 Innovation Drive Suite 300
San Dingo, CA .92128
Subject: Comments on Noise Issues for Tract 15911.
Dear Mr. Garcia,
We have reviewed the comments by Mr. James Banks, Jr. in the letter addressed April 21, 2000
to the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga. In the letter, Mr. Banks, Jr. addresses several issues.
We have agreed to respond only to the issue pertaining to noise mitigation required for Tract
15911. Mr. Banks, Jr. raises the issue of berming and vegetation (trees and shrubs) as a noise
barrier verses a concrete block noise barrier. This paxticuiar issue will be discussed in the
following paragraphs.
The results of our noise analysis for Tract 15911 (refer to Mestre Greve Associates Report ~00-
08; "Noise Analysis For Tentative Tracts 15911 & 15912; January 26, 2000) did conclude that
homes adjacent to the I- 15 Freeway will require a noise barrier up to 17 feet in height in order to
meet the City' s noise standard. Effective noise barriers consist of a concrete or plexi glass wall,
a ben, or a combination of the two.
The Highway Noise Model published by the Federal Highway Administration CFHWA
Highway Traffic Noise Prediction Model", FHWA-RD~77-108, December 1978), states" lfthe
woods are very dense. i.e., there is no clear line of sight between the observer and the source,
and if the height of the trees extends at least 5 metres above the line of sight, then a 5 dBA
attenuation is allowed if the woods have a depth of 30 metres. An additional 5 dBA may be
obtained if the depth of the woods extends for another 30 metres. 10 dBA is the maximum
attenuation dense woods can provide ". Several other publications on noise control support this
conclusion (refer to Beranek, L,L., Editor, "Noise And Vibration Control", 1988; Hendriks, R,
"Technical Noise Supplement") Noise may be attenuated by trees and shrubs but the result is
not nearly as effective or feasible as a concrete block wall.
Sincerely,
Mestre Greve Associates
Fred Greve, P,E.
280 Newport Center Drive, Suite 230 · Newport Beach, CA 92660 ° (949) 760-0891 ° Fax (949) 760-1928
May ':'~. 2000
Clandestine Tatlonghad
1502 Lagoon Street
West Covina, CA 91790
BYIAND
HOMES
5740 Fleet Street
Suite 200
Carlsbad, California 92008
(760) 603-8001 Tel
(760) 603-8005 Fax
Dear Clandestine,
We appreciate your aunt's interest in our Ryland Community and hope we can accommodate her
home needs. Thank you for voicing your concems over the environment specific to our project Ryland
with an already appmved Tentative Map and Conditions of Approval purchased this project This
included the removal of trees. However, the conditions also had a mitigation measure that requires the
replanting of trees of vadous species. We will implement this mitigation measure.
Ryland as a whole does many positive deeds to enrich our environment. Among them is dedication of
land to vadous Parks and Recreation entities, building of panks within our community, and payment of
fees used specifically to build parks and / or improve them.
Thank you for your support and interest in Ryland's success.
/D 7
Mestre Grove Associmes
May 31, 2000
Mr. Carlos Oareta
Rybnd Homes
5740 Fleet Street, Suite 200
Cadsbad, CA 92008
Subject: Comments on Nois~ Issues for Tract 15911.
D~ar Mr. Gareia,
The purpose of this letw, r is to further address the issue of vegetation (trees and shrubs) as a
means of attenuating nois~ in order to meet the City of gauche Cueamonga required noise
standards for Tract 15911- As menlionc~iin our previous lelter dated May 15, 2000, a depth of
60 roeten (200 ~.) of dense woods would provide approxinlately a 10 dBA atllmuation.
However, this i s a generalization and the actual reduction could be anything between 5 and 15
dBA. In ordor for this statement to be somewhat valid, the dense woods would have to be
matured and on an even plane, Hence, the statement thai a 10 dBA a!Ienuation of noise due to
200 ft. of dense woods is a generalizalion and cannot be accuraiely suppored by future noise
p~diction anal}sis. Furthermore, since th~ worst cas~ observer { at Lot 16) will be exposed to
noise levels of 74.6 CNfL appwxirnsxsly 200 ft. of such dense and matured woods would be
required. It appears that such mitil;ation measures for this parlivular pwjea will not be feasible.
Addilionally, we would not support this approval due to the uncertainty of the effcotiveness of
such acouslical n~alrnents.
Sincere]y,
Meare Cnve Associates
Fred C~ve, P.E,
280 Newpod Center Drive, Suite 230 · Newlx}n Beech, CA 92660 · (949) 760-0891 · Fax (949) 7601928 //
~0/E0 'd ~,~ :~ 000~-~£-A~N
1-15 FREEWAY
ES
m
O
O
O
23.95' 115'?
2%
H=16' TO 17"'~ OT A
& CCWD O~E
~ EASEMENT =38'.
TOP OF-~ ' o PER FINAL ACOUSTICAL REPORT .
EXIST. 15" SEW~E~R~ H=2.0' TO 6.7'
COVER DEPTH = 8.8'? PER PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PLANS
(STD. DWG. 604 TYPE B)
Report ~tO0-08
Page 8 of 20
The FHWA model used these assumptions to Compute the future noise levels at the project site.
Table 3 reports the modeling results in terms of distances to the 60, 65, and 70 CNEL contours.
These represent the distances from the cente~ine of the roadway to the contour value shown. Note
that the values given in Table 3 do not take into account the effect of intervening topography that
may affect the roadway noise exposure. Topographic effects are included in a subsequent section
of this report. In addition, these projections do not include any future vehicle noise reduction
assumptions to take into account the effects of legislation requiring quieter vehicles in the future.
~"~rTABLE ~
Roadway -70- -65- ' -60-
4.1 Combined Noise Exposure
Projecting the traffic noise levels of two separate noise sources and combining them
logarithmically results in the combined noise level impacting the project site. For example,
calculations have established that building surfaces at Lot 1 of Tract 15912 will be exposed to East
Avenue traffic noise levels of approximately 65.3 CNEL. Building surfaces at Lot I of Tract
15912 will be exposed to 1-15 traffic noise levels of approximately 67.8 CNEL. Summing these
noise levels results in a combined traffic noise level of 69.7 CNEL impacting the building
surfaces.
5.0 EXTERIOR NOISE MITIGATION
For the exterior living areas which are exposed to noise levels greater than 65 CNEL, some form
of noise mitigation is required. An effective method of reducing the traffic noise to acceptable
levels is with a noise barrier. Representative cross-sections along 1-15 Freeway and East Avenue
(see Appendix 1A for analysis data) were analyzed utilizing the FHWA Model to determine the
necessary noise barrier locations and heights. The results of the analysis indicate that in order to
meet the 65 CNEL exterior noise standard. a noise barrier will be required for exterior living areas
adjacent to 1-15 Freeway and East Avenue. The required noise barrier locations and heights to
meet the 65 CNEL exterior noise standard are listed in Table 4, and are shown in Exhibit 2 and 3.
T H E C ITY OF
~ANCIIO CUCAMONCA
Staff Report
DATE:
TO:
FRO~
BY:
SUBJECT:
April 12, 2000
Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
Brad Buller, City Planner
Brent Le Count, AICP, Associate Planner
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 99-72 -
RYLAND HOMES - The design review of building elevations and detailed site
plan for 78 homes within Tentative Tracts 15911 and 15912 in the Low-Medium
Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan,
located on the southwest and northeast corners of East Avenue and the
Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way - APN: 227-131-05 and 227-141-11 and
12. Related File: Variance 99-11.
VARIANCE 99-11 - RYLAND HOMES - A request to construct perimeter tract
walls up to approximately 17 feet high where a maximum height of 6 feet is
permitted for freeway noise mitigation purposes for Tracts 15911 and 15912 in
the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda
Specific Plan, located on the southwest and northeast corners of East Avenue
and the Southern Pacific right-of-way - APN: 227-131-05 and 227-141-11 and
12, Related Files: Development Review 99-72, Tentative Tract 15911 and
15912.
PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
Backqround: The Planning Commission approved Tentative Tracts 15911 and 15912 in
October of 1998. The current request is for a Design Review of the homes, grading, and
landscaping for both tracts.
Site Characteristics: The project sites are located on the east and west sides of East
Avenue and on the north and south sides of an abandoned railroad right-of-way. The Tract
15911 site (east side of East Avenue) is undeveloped land with non-native grasses and
other ruderal plant species. There are no windrows or heritage trees within the project
boundaries. The mature windrow south of the abandoned railroad will not be impacted by
the project. The Tract 15912 site (west of East Avenue) contains a single-family dwelling,
accessory structures, and a collection of inoperable vehicles and debris. There are four
stands of Eucalyptus windrows on-site which show signs of damage by borer beetles, fire,
and barbed wire and are generally in poor condition. A healthy Eucalyptus windrow stand
113
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
DR 99-72 & VAR 99-11 - RYLAND HOMES
April 12, 2000
Page 2
is south of the site and will not be impacted by the project. The Planning Commission
approved a Tree Removal Permit for removal of the trees with the Tentative Tract Map.
The sites slopes approximately 2 to 3 percent from north to south.
ANALYSIS:
General: The number of lots for the Tract 15911 site is proposed to be reduced from 26 to
23 to accommodate a larger home plan than originally anticipated. Lot size ranges from
7,895 square feet to 18,600 square feet (10,000 square foot average) and homes range
from 2,566 square feet to 3,300 square feet. Four home plans are proposed, each with
four separate elevation types (reverse plotting and side-on garage alternatives provide
even greater variation). A pedestrian paseo with river rock treatment (low maintenance) is
provided at the east side of Tract 15911 site connecting to a community horse trail. The
home designs are the same as were approved for Tract 15798 (currently being
constructed near the southwest corner of the Route 30 and I-15 Freeways) and exhibit a
high level of design integrity.
Variance: The Tentative Tract Maps were conditionally approved by the Planning
Commission in October 1998. As environmental mitigation for freeway traffic noise, high
sound walls are required. The highest sound walls will be along the south and east sides
of the Tract 15911 site (northeast corner of Southern Pacific Railroad/East Avenue). The
wall along the south side is as high as 16 feet overall (retaining wall plus free standing wall
above) and along the east edge as high as 21 feet. The maximum allowed wall height in
Rancho Cucamonga is 6 feet; hence, a Vadance is necessary. Staff believes that findings
can be made for approval of the Variance given the unique location of the sites so near the
I-15 Freeway (which is substantially higher than the project site), that strict enforcement of
the 6-foot height limit would preclude development of the site in accordance with the land
use designation since the high walls are necessary to comply with General
Plan/Development Code residential noise level criteria, and the excessive wall height will
not have a demonstrable negative visual impact. The height of the walls are proposed to
be softened by a combined split face/fluted block design with vine planting along the base
trained to climb the walls.
Desiqn Review Committee: The Committee (McNiel, Stewad, Coleman) reviewed the
project on February 29, 2000, and recommended approval with conditions. Refer to the
attached Design Review Action Agenda for further details (Exhibit H).
Technical Review Committee: The Grading and Technical Review Committees have
reviewed the project and recommend approval subject to conditions outlined in the
attached Resolution of Approval.
Environmental Assessment: The applicant has completed Part I of the Initial Study and
staff completed Part II (the Environmental Checklist). It was found that local
environmental conditions have not changed appreciably since the tracts were approved in
October of 1998. In brief, various drainage, biological, traffic, and noise issues impact the
site. Mitigation measures for these issues were adopted by the Commission with tract
approval and these mitigation measures are also included in the attached Resolution of
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
DR 99-72 & VAR 99-11 - RYLAND HOMES
April12,2000
Page 3
Approval. Staff has determined that, with these mitigation measures, there would not be a
significant adverse impact upon the environment as a result of this project. Staff
recommends issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration.
CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily
Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all proper~y owners
within a 300-foot radius of the project site.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Development
Review 99-72 and Variance 99-11 through adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval
with Conditions and issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration.
Respectfully submitted,
City Planner
BB:BLC:mlg
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Utilization Map
Exhibit "B" - Site Plan
Exhibit "C" - Grading Plan
Exhibit "D" - Landscape Plan
Exhibit "E" - Floor Plans
Exhibit "F" Elevations
Exhibit "G" - Initial Study Pads I and II
Exhibit "H" - Design Review Action Agenda dated February 29, 2000
Resolution of Approval DR 99-72
Resolution of Approval VAR 99-11
//5
RESOLUTION NO. O ~) ' / ~) -~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, UPHOLDING THE ACTION OF THE
PLANNING COMMISSION AND APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
99-72 THE APPEAL OF THE DESIGN REVIEW OF BUILDING ELEVATIONS
AND DETAILED SITE PLAN FOR 78 HOMES WITHIN TENTATIVE TRACTS
15911 AND 15912 IN THE LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (4-8
DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN,
LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST AND NORTHEAST CORNERS OF EAST
AVENUE AND THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY-
APN: 227-131-05 AND 227-141-11 AND 12.
A. Recitals.
1. Ryland Homes has filed an application for the approval of Development Review 99-72,
as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development
Review request is referred to as "the application."
2. On the 14th day of October 1998, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a meeting and approved Tentative Tracts 15911 and 15912, which are the
sites of the current application.
3. On the 12th day of April 2000, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date.
4. The decision represented by said Planning Commission Resolution was appealed in a
timely manner to this Council.
5. On June 7 and continued to June 21, and July 5, 2000, the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application.
6. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part
"A," of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-
referenced public hearing on June 7, and continued to June 21 and July 5, 2000, including, but not
limited to, written and oral staff reports, the minutes of the above-referenced Planning Commission
meeting, and the contents of Planning Commission Resolution No. 00-31, and together with public
testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to property located on both sides of East Avenue on the
north and south sides of an abandoned Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way with a street frontage
of 1,240 feet on East Avenue and lot depth of 600 to 1,300 feet and is presently vacant; and
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
APPEAL OF DR 99-72 - BANKS
July 5, 2000
Page 2
b. The property to the north of the subject site is vacant and developed with single-
family homes, the property to the south consists of vacant land and the I-15 Freeway, the property
to the east is vacant and the 1-15 Freeway, and the property to the west is vacant and developed
with single-family homes; and
c. The proposed home plans are the same as were recently approved for Tract 15798
and exhibit a high level of design integrity; and
d. The General Plan and the Etiwanda Specific Plan designate a public Community
Trail off-site within the railroad easement to the south of the Tract 15911 site; and
e. The property is one block away from Etiwanda High School and approximately two
blocks away from Etiwanda Intermediate School and will generate additional traffic and school
children that will use East Avenue and Victoria Street; and
f. High sound walls are proposed which will reduce noise from the I-15 Freeway for
future residents; and
g. The excessive height of the sound walls will be mitigated by using split faced and
fluted block and a two-toned color scheme; and
h. The frontage improvements include construction of the East Avenue Parkway wall
consistent with the Etiwanda Specific Plan; and
i. Environmental impacts related to drainage, traffic, and noise will be mitigated to a
level of less than significant.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-
referenced public hearing on June 7and continued to June 21 and July 5, 2000, including, but not
limited to, written and oral staff reports, the minutes of the above-referenced Planning Commission
meeting, the contents of Planning Commission Resolution No. 00-31, and together with public
testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows with reference to points raised by the
appellant:
a. That it would be infeasible for the developer to provide a buffer zone with berms
and trees to control freeway noise because the extreme width of such a buffer zone would preclude
development of the site consistent with Etiwanda Specific Plan permitted land uses; and
b. While high walls proposed within the development may cause large shadow areas,
these areas only impact homes within the project and any impact is offset by the noise attenuation
function of the walls; and
c. It is feasible to design and engineer walls high enough to effectively mitigate
freeway noise; and
d. The walls are designed with decorative masonry and include vine pockets with
provisions for vine planting to grow onto the outside of the walls; and
//7
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
APPEAL OF DR 99-72 - BANKS
July 5, 2000
Page 3
e. The use of higher than normal walls has already been established as precedence
for freeway noise mitigation elsewhere in the community.
4. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-
referenced public hearing on June 7, and continued to June 21 and July 5, 2000, and upon the
specific findings of fact set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Council hereby specifically
finds as follows:
a. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan in
that it includes high quality residential design appropriate to the Etiwanda area and will minimize
noise levels from the 1-15 Freeway for residents within the tract;
b. That the proposed design is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code
and the Etiwanda Specific Plan and the purposes of the districtin which the site is located in that it
is responsive to the environmental resources of the site, promotes development compatible with
surrounding uses, and minimizes the impact of high sound walls on the surround area;
c. That the proposed design is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of
the Development Code and the Etiwanda Specific Plan;
d. That the proposed design, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not
be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity in that it minimizes potential fire, seismic, and flood related hazards.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,
this Council hereby denies the appeal, upholds the action of the Planning Commission, and
approves the application subject to all conditions of approval contained in Planning Commission
Resolution No. 00-31, attached hereto.
6. The City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby directed to: (a) certify to the
adoption of this Resolution, and (b) forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified
mail, return-receipt requested, to Caries Garcia with Ryland Homes and James Banks, at the
addresses identified in City records.
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA UPHOLDING THE ACTION OF THE
PLANNING COMMISSION AND APPROVING VARIANCE NO. 99-11 TO
ALLOW WALLS UP TO APPROXIMATELY 21 FEET IN HEIGHT FOR
FREEWAY NOISE MITIGATION PURPOSES WHERE A MAXIMUM HEIGHT
OF SIX FEET IS ALLOWED LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST AND
NORTHEAST CORNERS OF EAST AVENUE AND THE SOUTHERN
PACIFIC RIGHT-OF-WAY IN THE LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
(4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227-131-05 AND 227-141-11 AND 12.
A. Recitals.
1. Ryland Homes has filed an application for the approval of Development Review
No. 99-72, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject
Development Review request is referred to as "the application."
2. On the 14th day of October 1998, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a meeting and approved Tentative Tracts 15911 and 15912 which are the
sites of the current application.
3. On the 12th day of April 2000, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date.
4. The decision represented by said Planning Commission Resolution was timely appealed
to this Council.
5. On June 7, and continued to June 21 and July 5, 2000, the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application.
6. All legal Prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part
"A," of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-
referenced public hearing on June 7, and continued to June 21, and July 5, 2000, including, but not
limited to, written and oral staff reports, the minutes of the above-referenced Planning Commission
meeting, and the contents of Planning Commission Resolution No. 00-32, and together with public
testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to property located on both sides of East Avenue on the
north and south sides of abandoned Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way with a street frontage of
1,240 feet on East Avenue and lot depth of 600 to 1,300 feet and is presently vacant; and
//?
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
APPEAL OF VAR 99-11 - BANKS
July 5, 2000
Page 2
b. The property to the north of the subject site is vacant and developed with
single-family homes, the property to the south consists of vacant land and the 1-15 Freeway, the
property to the east is vacant and the 1-15 Freeway, and the property to the west is vacant and
developed with single-family homes; and
c. The increase in wall height is necessary to reduce noise from the I-15 Freeway to
an acceptable level for residential development; and
d. The visual impact of the increase in wall heightwill be mitigated by providing a two-
tone color scheme and decorative wall material.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-
referenced public hearing on June 7, June 21, and July 5, 2000, including, but not limitedto, written
and oral staff reports, the minutes of the above-referenced Planning Commission meeting, the
contents of Planning Commission Resolution No. 00-32, and together with public testimony, this
Council hereby specifically finds as follows with reference to points raised by the appellant:
a. That it would be infeasible for the developer to provide a buffer zone with berms
and trees to control freeway noise because the extreme width of such a buffer zone would preclude
development of the site consistent with Etiwanda Specific Plan permitted land uses; and
b. While high walls proposed within the development may cause large shadow areas,
these areas only impact homes within the project and any impact is offset by the noise attenuation
function of the walls; and
c. It is feasible to design and engineer walls high enough to effectively mitigate
freeway noise; and
d. The walls are designed with decorative masonry and include vine pockets with
provisions for vine planting to grow onto the outside of the walls; and
e. The use of higher than normal walls has already been established as precedence
for freeway noise mitigation elsewhere in the community.
4. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-
referenced public hearing on June 7, and continued to June 21 and July 5, 2000, and upon the
specific findings of fact set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Council hereby specifically
finds as follows:
a. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulations
would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives
of the Development Code in that the only alternative to mitigate freeway noise without exceeding the
six foot wall height limit would be to construct very high earthen berms which would severely limit
the site area available for residential development.
b. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable
to the property involved or to the intended use of the propertythat do not apply generally to other
properties in the same district in that the site is located adjacent to the 1-15 Freeway which
generates substantial traffic noise. Freeway noise must be reduced to acceptable levels in order to
permit residential development of the site consistent with noise thresholds established by the
CiTY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
APPEAL Of Var 99-11 - BANKS
July 5, 2000
Page 3
General Plan and the Development Code.
c. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would
deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district in
that compliance with the six foot height limit would preclude the site from being developed in concert
with the permitted land uses due to excessive freeway noise.
d. That the granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege
inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district in that most other
properties in the district are not equally impacted by the 1-15 Freeway noise.
e. That the granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety,
or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity in that for the most part
the walls will not be completely visible to the public and the walls will have a two-tone color scheme
with split faced and fluted block to soften their appearance,
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,
this Council hereby denies the appeal, upholds the action of the Planning Commission, and
approves the application subject to all conditions of approval contained in Planning Commission
Resolution No. 00-32, attached hereto.
6. The City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby directed to: (a) certify to the
adoption of this Resolution, and (b) forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified
mail, return-receipt requested, to Carlos Garcia with Ryland Homes and James Banks, at the
addresses identified in City records.