Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2017/07/19 - Agenda Packet
AMENDED AGENDAS FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD — HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY — SUCCESSOR AGENCY — PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY - CITY COUNCIL WEDNESDAY, JULY 19,2017 REGULAR MEETINGS: 1St d 3rd Wednesdays - 7:00 P.M. ORDER OF BUSINESS: CLOSED SESSION Tapia Conference Room REGULAR MEETINGS Council Chambers MEMBERS: MAYOR MAYOR PRO TEM COUNCIL MEMBERS L. Dennis Michael Lynne B. Kennedy William Alexander Sam Spagnolo Diane Williams 641I1l "T 7:00 P.M. CITY MANAGER CITY ATTORNEY CITY CLERK CITY TREASURER John R. Gillison James L. Markman Janice C. Reynolds James C. Frost Rancho Cucamonga City Council Mission Statement Make decisions, and be perceived as making decisions, for the general welfare of the community. Always work to improve existing services and develop policies to meet the expected as well as anticipated needs of the community. Work together cooperatively to respect all persons and their ideas in order to develop and maintain the trust of the community. Reflect the community's desires and priorities by assuring that decisions accurately reflect the community's interests by fairly translating public feedback into public policy. Enhance the quality of life of all Rancho Cucamonga residents through the continued pursuit of excellence and commitment to the City's core values and goals. Set the vision for the community for the future. Have a professional, objective, and respectful relationship with each other in order to more effectively address the challenges of the future. Amended Agenda 07/19/17 10:00am IC/A INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC �O OCAMONGA TO ADDRESS THE FIRE BOARD, HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL The Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council encourage free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the Agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council by filling out a speaker card and submitting it to the City Clerk. The speaker cards are located on the wall at the back of the Chambers, at the front desk behind the staff table and at the City Clerk's desk. Any handouts for the Fire Board, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority or City Council should be given to the City Clerk for distribution. During "Public Communications," your name will be called to speak on any item listed or not listed on the agenda in the order in which it was received. The "Public Communications" period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these business items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the agenda commences. Any other "Public Communications" which have not concluded during this one-hour period may resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. If you are present to speak on an "Advertised Public Hearing" or on an "Administrative Hearing" Item(s), your name will be called when that item is being discussed, in the order in which it was received. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. AGENDA BACK-UP MATERIALS Staff reports and back-up materials for agenda items are available for review at the City Clerk's counter, the City's Public Libraries and on the City's website. A complete copy of the agenda is also available at the desk located behind the staff table during the Council meeting. LIVE BROADCAST Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council meetings are broadcast live on Channel 3 for those with cable television access. Meetings are rebroadcast on the second and fourth Wednesdays of each month at 11:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. Streaming Video on Demand is available on the City's website at www.cityofrc.us/cityhall/council/videos.asp. The Fire Board, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council meet regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive. Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, and Public Financing Authority. Copies of the agendas and minutes can be found @ www.cityofrc.us If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's office at (909) 477-2700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. Please silence all cell phones and devices while the meeting is in session. Amended Agenda 07/19/17 10:00am JULY 1% 2017 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Roll Call: Mayor Michael Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy Council Members Alexander, Spagnolo and Williams CLOSED SESSION CALLED TO ORDER AS THE CITY COUNCIL. D1. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR ROBERT NEIUBER, HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54954.2 REGARDING LABOR NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEE GROUP, RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION, TEAMSTERS LOCAL 1932. — CITY D2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(A) — SOUTHWEST VOTERS REGISTRATION EDUCATION PROJECT AND LOUISA OLLAGUE V. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; CASE NO. CIVRS 1603632. — CITY D3. CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT BASE LINE ROAD AND DAY CREEK (APN#: 1089- 031-36-0000); NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND STEVE PONTELL, PRESIDENT AND CEO, NATIONAL COMMUNITY RENAISSANCE; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS. — HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY D4. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957 (TITLE: CITY MANAGER) Page 1 of 10 JULY 1% 2017 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA CLOSED SESSION TO RECESS TO THE REGULAR FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY, AND CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS AT 7:00 P.M. IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS AT CITY HALL, LOCATED AT 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. THE REGULAR MEETINGS OF THE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY, AND CITY COUNCIL WILL BE CALLED TO ORDER. IT IS THE INTENT TO CONCLUDE THE MEETINGS BY 10:00 P.M., UNLESS EXTENDED BY CONCURRENCE OF THE FIRE BOARD, AGENCIES, AUTHORITY BOARD AND COUNCIL. Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call: Mayor Michael Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy Council Members Alexander, Spagnolo and Williams Al. Announcement of Rancho Cucamonga's Selection to Join National What Works Cities Initiative. --- A2. Presentation of a $25,000 check donation from the Rancho Cucamonga Friends of the Library, which directly supports important library programs such as the adult literacy program and the Children's --- Summer Reading Program. This is the time and place for the general public to address the Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Council on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Mayor, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Fire Board, Agencies, Successor Agency, Authority Board, or City Council not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. Page 2 of 10 JULY 1% 2017 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these business items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the agenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this one hour period may resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed. C1. Consideration to approve Minutes of: June 21, 2017 (Regular Meeting) June 22, 2017 (Special Meeting) C2. Consideration to approve Check Register dated June 13, 2017 through July 10, 2017 and Electronic Debit Register for the month of June for the total of $2,721,121.77. C3. Consideration to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of June 30, 2017. 24 C4. Consideration to approve a purchase of one (1) Type One Fire Engine from KME, of Nesquehoning, 30 PA. C5. Consideration of approval to enter into a Contract Renewal for Trimester Use of Force Training 2017- 32 22 with the San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department. C6. Consideration of approval of an increase to HMC Architects Contract No. FD13-019 and approval of Amendment No. 004 for additional construction administration services for the Fire District All -Risk 41 Training Center and approval of an appropriation of funds. C7. Consideration to approve the renewal of the annual contract with EMCOR Services/ Mesa Energy 44 Systems for Citywide HVAC&R Maintenance and Repair Services in an amount not to exceed $45,000. C8. Consideration of approval to set Annual Special Tax Levy for Community Facilities District Nos. 85-1 45 and 88-1 for Fiscal Year 2017/18. A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING THE 47 ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017/18 RESOLUTION NO. FD 17-015 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING THE 56 ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017/18 Page 3 of 10 JULY 19, 2017 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA C9 D1 E1 F1 G1 G2 Consideration for approval to authorize a multi-year agreement for Cisco Smartnet Services at the conclusion of the bid process to be completed July 17, 2017 and for Authorization to appropriate 65 additional funds from the Computer Equipment and Technology Replacement Fund Reserves. Consideration to approve Minutes of: June 21, 2017 (Regular Meeting) Consideration to approve Minutes of: June 21, 2017 (Regular Meeting) Consideration to approve Minutes of: June 21, 2017 (Regular Meeting) Consideration to approve Minutes of: June 21, 2017 (Regular Meeting) June 22, 2017 (Special Meeting) Consideration to approve Check Register and Payroll dated June 13, 2017 through July 10, 2017 and 66 Electronic Debit Register for the month of June for the total of $9,291,678.53. G3. Consideration to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of June 30, 2017. 89 G4. Consideration to approve Amendment No. 003 authorizing an increase to Professional Services 100 Agreement (C0#1 5-082) to Sargent Town Planning, Inc. G5. Consideration to authorize the City Engineer to rescind the Improvement Agreement and Release Improvement Security for DRC2012-01065 located at 8628 & 8604 Hickory Avenue and approve the 139 Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for DRC2016-00466 located at 8628 & 8604 Hickory Avenue, between Arrow Route and Whittram Avenue. G6. Consideration to approve a Corrective Quit Claim Deed for purchase of a Right -of -Way located at 7745 158 Vineyard Avenue. G7. Consideration to accept public improvements east of Etiwanda Avenue and north of Arrow Route for 166 Tract 18870 as complete, file the Notice of Completion and authorize release of bonds. G8. Consideration to accept public improvements along Archibald Avenue, Ramona Avenue, La Vine Street, and the Pacific Electric Trail for Tract 18912 as complete, file the Notice of Completion and 169 authorize release of bonds. G9. Consideration to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond No. 491029P in the amount of $451,664, for 172 the FY 2014-2015 Haven Avenue Electric Distribution Line Extension Project, Contract No. 15-055. Page 4 of 10 JULY 19, 2017 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA G10. Consideration to approve an Improvement Agreement and Improvement Securities for DRC2015- 174 00804, located at 10348 Almond Street. G11. Consideration to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond No. 800028352 in the amount of $13,640, for 177 Tract 16324 at the north end of Wardman Bullock Road. G12. Consideration to approve the renewal of Contract No. 16-148 with Brightview Landscape Services, Inc. for the maintenance of Parks within Landscape Maintenance District 1 (LMD-1) in an amount not to 181 exceed $314,000. G13. Consideration to approve the renewal of Contract No. 2012-009 with Brightview Landscape Services, Inc. for maintenance of Parkway Paseo and Median Landscapes within Landscape Maintenance 182 Districts 1,2, 4R and 5 (LMDs 1, 2, 4R and 5) in an amount not to exceed $1,801,000. G14. Consideration to approve the renewal of the Annual Contract for Citywide HVAC&R Maintenance and 184 Repair Services with EMCOR Services/Mesa Energy Systems in an amount not to exceed $390,000. G15. Consideration to release the Maintenance Bond for the Construction of a Family Restroom at Loanmart 185 Stadium. G16. Consideration of approval of Resolution No. 17-059, establishing an Annual Levy for the costs incurred in the collection of assessments within Assessment District No. 93-1 (Masi Plaza) for Fiscal Year 186 2017/18. RESOLUTION NO. 17-059 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, 188 RE -AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF AN ASSESSMENT SURCHARGE FOR THE EXPENSES INCURRED IN THE COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS IN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 93-1 G17. Consideration of approval of Resolution No. 17-060 approving to set Annual Benefit Assessments for 194 Drainage Area No. 91-2 (Day Canyon Drainage Basin) for Fiscal Year 2017/18. RESOLUTION NO. 17-060 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING THE COST OF SERVICE TO BE FINANCED BY BENEFIT ASSESSMENTS TO BE 197 LEVIED IN DRAINAGE AREA NO. 91-2 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017/18 AND DETERMINING AND IMPOSING SUCH BENEFIT ASSESSMENTS G18. Consideration of approval to set Annual Special Tax for Community Facilities District Nos. 2000-01, 2000-02, 2000-03, 2000-03 Special Tax "B", 2001-01 (Improvement Area Nos. 1 and 2), 2001-01 207 (Improvement Area No. 3), 2003-01 (Improvement Area No. 1), 2003-01 (Improvement Area No. 2), 2004-01, 2006-01, and 2006-02 for Fiscal Year 2017/18. RESOLUTION NO. 17-061 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, 210 RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2000-01 (SOUTH ETIWANDA) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017/18 RESOLUTION NO. 17-062 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, 216 RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2000-02 (RANCHO CUCAMONGA CORPORATE PARK) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017/18 Page 5 of 10 JULY 1% 2017 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA RESOLUTION NO. 17-063 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, 222 PROVIDING FOR THE LEVY OF SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-03 (RANCHO SUMMIT) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017/18 RESOLUTION NO. 17-064 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING FOR THE LEVY OF MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX "B" FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES 229 DISTRICT NO. 2000-03 (RANCHO SUMMIT) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017/18 TO FINANCE THE OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF PARKS AND PARKWAYS RESOLUTION NO. 17-065 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, 235 RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2001-01 (IMPROVEMENT AREAS NO. 1 AND 2) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017/18 RESOLUTION NO. 17-066 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, 242 RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2001-01 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 3) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017/18 RESOLUTION NO. 17-067 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, 248 RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX RATE FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2003- 01 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 1) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017/18 RESOLUTION NO. 17-068 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, 255 RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2003-01 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 2) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017/18 RESOLUTION NO. 17-069 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, 262 RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2004-01 (RANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATES) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017/18 RESOLUTION NO. 17-070 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, 269 RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2006- 01 (VINTNER'S GROVE) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017/18 RESOLUTION NO. 17-071 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, 275 RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2006-02 (AMADOR ON ROUTE 66) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017/18 G19. Consideration of approval to authorize a Multi-year Agreement for Cisco Smartnet Services at the conclusion of the bid process to be completed July 17, 2017 and for authorization to appropriate 281 additional funds from the Computer Equipment and Technology Replacement Fund Reserves. G20. Consideration of approval of an award to ConvergeOne of Ontario for the purchase of two Dell Power Edge Servers and for authorization to appropriate additional funds from the Computer Equipment and 282 Technology Replacement Fund Reserves. Page 6 of 10 JULY 19, 2017 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA G21. Consideration of approval to procure Veeam Backup Solution Software and Services at the conclusion of the bid process to be completed July 17, 2017 and for authorization to appropriate additional funds 284 from the Computer Equipment and Technology Replacement Fund Reserves. G22. Consideration of approval of a three-year Enterprise License Agreement with ESRI for comprehensive GIS Services in the total amount of $403,000 over the life of the agreement, of which $116,000 is for 285 FY 2017/18, and authorization to appropriate additional funds for the current year contract. G23. Consideration of approval of an award to TABORDA SOLUTIONS, INC. for the purchase of VMware 295 Software Maintenance and Subscription Renewal in the amount of $66,899. G24. Consideration to approve a Professional Services Agreement with NEOGOV in the amount of $179,664 plus 10% contingency, and authorize an appropriation in the amount of $137,630 from the Computer 297 Equipment And Technology Replacement Fund for the NEOGOV Human Resources Information System Software Project. The following Ordinances have been introduced for First Reading. Second Readings are expected to be routine and non -controversial. The City Council will act upon them at one time without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be removed for discussion by a Council Member. H1. Consideration to conduct Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance No. 911, adopting a Local Agency Management Program (LAMP) Ordinance for Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems. 299 ORDINANCE NO. 911 (2nd Reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, 301 ADDING TITLE 19, ARTICLE 28 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ONSITE WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS H2. Consideration to conduct Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance No. 912 to be read by title only, amending the Municipal Code to enact requirements and standards for Creative Placemaking through 356 Public Art. ORDINANCE NO. 912 (2nd Reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, 358 AMENDING THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING CREATIVE PLACEMAKING AND PUBLIC ART Page 7 of 10 JULY 19, 2017 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Speaker cards may be submitted for all those who wish to speak on the following topic. The following item has no legal publication or posting requirements. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Mayor, depending upon the number of individuals wishing to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the City Council, not to members of the audience. 11. Consideration to Conduct First Reading and introduce Ordinance No. 913, to be read by title only and waive further reading, amending the definition of smoking in the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to include Electronic Smoking Devices and prohibit electronic smoking device use wherever smoking 371 is currently prohibited in the City. ORDINANCE NO. 913 (1St Reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, 377 AMENDING RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 8.21.020 TO MODIFY THE DEFINITION OF "SMOKE OR SMOKING" The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Mayor will open the meeting to receive public testimony. J1. Public Hearing to consider adoption of Resolution No. FD 17-016, adopting The Fire District General 378 Fund Final Budget for Fiscal Year 2017/18. RESOLUTION NO. FD 17-016 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE 380 PROTECTION DISTRICT, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A FINAL BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR JULY 1, 2017 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2018 J2. Public Hearing to consider First Reading of Ordinance No. 914 by title only - ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2016-00452 – DR HORTON – A request to change the Victoria Community Plan Zoning Designation for 28.4 acres of land at the southwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road from Regionally Related Office/Commercial (RROC) to Mixed Use (MU) in the Victoria Community Plan (VCP) related to the construction of a mixed use project consisting of 380 residential units, a 71 room hotel and two restaurant 381 buildings totaling 12,000 square feet, located at the southwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road — APN: 1090-331-05. Related Files: Preliminary Review DRC2015-01102, Pre -Application Review DRC2016-00142, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19762, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20032, Conditional Use Permit DRC2016-00449, Design Review DRC2016-00450, Uniform Sign Program DRC2016-00451 and Minor Exception DRC2016-00508. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ORDINANCE NO. 914 (1St Reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2016-00452, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN ZONING DESIGNATION FOR 28.4 ACRES OF LAND 823 FROM REGIONALLY RELATED OFFICE/COMMERCIAL (RROC) TO MIXED USE (MU) IN THE VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN (VCP) RELATED TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF A MIXED USE PROJECT CONSISTING OF 380 RESIDENTIAL UNITS , A 71 ROOM HOTEL AND TWO RESTAURANT BUILDINGS TOTALING 12,000 SQUARE FEET, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST Page 8 of 10 JULY 1% 2017 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA CORNER OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD AND BASE LINE ROAD; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF — APN: 1090-331-05. J3. Public Hearing to consider approving the federally required FY2017/2018 Annual Action Plan, which includes the selection of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funded activities, based on a 829 grant allocation of $849,028. J4. Public Hearing to consider adopting Resolutions confirming the diagrams and assessments; approve the Annual Engineer's Reports; and order the levy and collection of annual assessments within Landscape Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3a, 3b, 4-r, 5, 6-r, 7, 8, 9 and 10, Street Lighting 876 Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, And 8, And Park and Recreation Improvement District No. Pd -85 for Fiscal Year 2017/18. RESOLUTION NO. 17-072 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAMS AND ASSESSMENTS; APPROVING THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S 881 REPORTS; AND ORDERING THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2,3A, 3B, 4-R, 5,6-R, 7, 8, 9 AND 10 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017/18 RESOLUTION NO. 17-073 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAMS AND THE ASSESSMENTS; APPROVING THE ANNUAL 883 ENGINEER'S REPORTS; AND ORDERING THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017/18 RESOLUTION NO. 17-074 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT; APPROVING THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S 885 REPORT; AND ORDERING THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. PD -85 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017/18 The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. K1. Update on 2017 City Council Goals. 1298 The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. L1. INTER -AGENCY UPDATES (Update by the City Council to the community on the meetings that were attended.) L2. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Council Member.) --- Page 9 of 10 JULY 1% 2017 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA CERTIFICATION I, Linda A. Troyan, MMC, City Clerk Services Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify under penalty of perjury that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on July 13, 2017, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and on the City's website. L' a A. Troyan, MMC City Clerk Services Director City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 10 of 10 Amended Agenda 07/19/17 10:00am JUNE 21, 2017 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CLOSED SESSION, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETINGS MINUTES The City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council held a closed session on Wednesday, June 21, 2017 in the Tapia Conference Room at the Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor Michael called the meeting to order at 5:OOp.m. Present were Council Members: Bill Alexander, Sam Spagnolo, Diane Williams, and Mayor L. Dennis Michael. Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy was absent. Also present were: John Gillison, City Manager; James L. Markman, City Attorney; Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services; Elisa Cox, Deputy City Manager/Cultural & Civic Services and Jeff Bloom, Deputy City Manager/Economic and Community Development. No public communications were made. No discussion or actions were taken. D1. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR ROBERT NEIUBER, HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54954.2 REGARDING LABOR NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEE GROUP, RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION, TEAMSTERS LOCAL 1932, FIRE MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEE GROUP, AND FIRE SUPPORT SERVICES ASSOCIATION. — CITY/FIRE D2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(A) — SOUTHWEST VOTERS REGISTRATION EDUCATION PROJECT AND LOUISA OLLAGUE V. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; CASE NO. CIVRS 1603632. — CITY D3. CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT BASE LINE ROAD AND DAY CREEK (APN#: 1089-031-36-0000); NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND STEVE PONTELL, PRESIDENT AND CEO, NATIONAL COMMUNITY RENAISSANCE; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS. — HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY **DRAFT** June 21, 20171 Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 1 of 11 The closed session recessed at 6:00 p.m. The regular meetings of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council were held on June 21, 2017 in the Council Chambers at City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor Michael called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Present were Council Members: Bill Alexander, Sam Spagnolo, Diane Williams and Mayor L. Dennis Michael. Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy was absent. Also present were: John Gillison, City Manager; James L. Markman, City Attorney; and Linda A. Troyan, City Clerk Services Director. Council Member Alexander led the Pledge of Allegiance. Al. Announcement of the 2017/18 Season at the Lewis Family Playhouse. Susan Sluka-Kelly, Victoria Gardens Cultural Center Cultural Arts Manager, announced and displayed a video on the 2017/18 Season at the Lewis Family Playhouse. Janet Walton offered a prayer. Kristine Scott, SoCalGas representative, provided information on construction work for a pipeline replacement on Archibald Avenue between Banyan Street and Lemon Avenue in Rancho Cucamonga, CA. Cl. Consideration to approve Minutes of: June 7, 2017 (Regular Meeting) June 8, 2017 (Special Meeting) C2. Consideration to approve Check Register dated May 30, 2017 through June 12, 2017 and Electronic Debit Register for the month of May 2017 for the total of $486,436.50. C3. Consideration to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of May 31, 2017. C4. Consideration to approve Seventh Amendment to Agreement for Legal Services with Richards, Watson & Gershon, A Professional Corporation. **DRAFT** June 21, 20171 Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 2 of 11 C5. Consideration to approve the award of a contract for Facility Landscape Maintenance at Fire Station 175 (Banyan Station) to Mariposa Landscapes Inc., in an amount not to exceed $20,000. C6. Consideration of approval of a Resolution adopting a Memorandum of Understanding between the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Fire Support Services Association for the period of 2017-2019. RESOLUTION NO. FD17-003 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, APPROVING THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE DISTRICT AND FIRE SUPPORT SERVICES ASSOCIATION RELATIVE TO WAGES, BENEFITS AND OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT FOR FISCAL YEARS 2017-2018 AND 2018-2019 C7. Consideration of approval of a Resolution adopting a Memorandum of Understanding between the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Fire Management Employee Group for the period of 2017-2019. RESOLUTION NO. FD17-004 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, APPROVING THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE DISTRICT AND FIRE MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES GROUP RELATIVE TO WAGES, BENEFITS AND OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT FOR FISCAL YEARS 2017-2018 AND 2018-2019 C8. Consideration of approval of a Resolution adopting Fire District salary schedules for Fiscal Year 2017-18. RESOLUTION NO. FD17-007 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SALARY SCHEDULES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 MOTION: Moved by Board Member Spagnolo, seconded by Board Member Alexander, to approve Consent Calendar Items C1. and C8. Motion carried, 4-0-1, Absent Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy. D1. Consideration to approve Minutes of: June 7, 2017 (Regular Meeting) D2. Consideration to approve Amendment to Disposition, Development and Loan Agreement Between the City of Rancho Cucamonga in its capacity as the Housing Successor to the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency, and Day Creek Senior Housing Partners, LP for a140 Unit Affordable Senior Housing To be Developed West of Day Creek Boulevard and North of Base Line Road (APN 1089-031-36). MOTION: Moved by Agency Member Williams, seconded by Agency Member Spagnolo, to approve Consent Calendar Item D1 through D2. Motion carried, 4-0-1, Absent Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy. E1. Consideration to approve Minutes of: June 7, 2017 (Regular Meeting) MOTION: Moved by Agency Member Alexander, seconded by Agency Member Williams, to approve Consent Calendar Item E1. Motion carried, 4-0-1, Absent Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy. **DRAFT** June 21, 20171 Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 3 of 11 F1. Consideration to approve Minutes of: June 7, 2017 (Regular Meeting) MOTION: Moved by Agency Member Spagnolo, seconded by Agency Member Alexander, to approve Consent Calendar Item F1. Motion carried, 4-0-1, Absent Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy. G1. Consideration to approve Minutes of: May 22, 2017 (Special Meeting) June 7, 2017 (Regular Meeting) June 8, 2017 (Special Meeting) G2. Consideration to approve Check Register and Payroll dated May 30, 2017 through June 12, 2017 and Electronic Debit Register for the month of May 2017 for the total of $4,537,918.31. G3. Consideration to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of May 31, 2017. G4. Consideration of approval of corrections to Amended Fiscal Year 2016/17 Appropriations. G5. Consideration to approve Amendment No. 3 to Amended and Restated Agreement for Legal Services with Richards, Watson & Gershon, A Professional Corporation. G6. Consideration of approval of Resolutions ordering the preparation of the Annual Engineer's Reports to initiate proceedings to levy annual assessments; approving the preliminary Annual Engineer's Reports; and declaring the City Council's intention to levy annual assessments within Landscape Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3a, 3b, 4-r, 5, 6-r, 7, 8, 9 and 10, Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8, and Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD -85 for Fiscal Year 2017/18 and setting the time and place for a Public Hearing thereon. RESOLUTION NO. 17-043 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE ASSESSMENT LAW FOR PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENT LEVY WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 313, 4-R, 5, 6-R, 7, 8, 9 AND 10, INCLUSIVE, FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017/18 RESOLUTION NO. 17-044 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4-R, 5, 6-R, 7, 8, 9 AND 10, INCLUSIVE, FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017/18 RESOLUTION NO. 17-045 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO PROVIDE FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017/18 IN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4-R, 5, 6-R, 7, 8, 9 AND 10, INCLUSIVE, AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING THEREON RESOLUTION NO. 17-046 **DRAFT** June 21, 20171 Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 4 of 11 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE ASSESSMENT LAW FOR PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENT LEVY WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8, INCLUSIVE, FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017/18 RESOLUTION NO. 17-047 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8, INCLUSIVE, FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017/18 RESOLUTION NO. 17-048 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO PROVIDE FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017/18 IN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8, INCLUSIVE, AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING THEREON RESOLUTION NO. 17-049 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE ASSESSMENT LAW FOR PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENT LEVY WITHIN PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. PD -85 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017/18. RESOLUTION NO. 17-050 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. PD -85 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017/18 RESOLUTION NO. 17-051 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO PROVIDE FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017/18 WITHTIN PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. PD -85 AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING THEREON G7. Consideration to approve the proposal from Gyroscope, Inc. to provide Professional Museum Consulting Services to the Rancho Cucamonga Public Library for the development of the interactive learning space on the 2nd Floor of the Paul A. Biane Library. G8. Consideration to approve Amendment No. 002 renewing the Professional Services Agreement in the amount of $175,000 with Vanderhawk Consulting LLC (CO#14-249), for the City's Asset Management Program Support for FY 2017/2018. G9. Consideration to adopt Resolution No. 17-052, adopting the amended Measure "I" Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan covering Fiscal Years 2016/2021. RESOLUTION NO. 17-052 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE AMENDED MEASURE "I" FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM COVERING FISCAL YEARS 2016/2021 FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF MEASURE "I" FUNDS G10. Consideration to award a Contract with Alfaro Communication Construction Inc. in the amount of $2,327,205 Plus 10% Contingency and Authorize an Appropriation in the amount of $841,426 **DRAFT** June 21, 20171 Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 5 of 11 from the Transportation Fund for the Fiscal Year 2016/17 Installation of Four (4) Traffic Signals at Various Locations Project. G11. Consideration to award a Contract with All American Asphalt in an amount Of $188,000 plus 10% contingency for the FY 2016-2017 Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation Overlay of Various Streets. G12. Consideration to award a Contract with Roy Allan Slurry Seal, Inc. in an amount of $432,153 plus 10% contingency for the FY 2016-2017 Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation Slurry Seal of Various Streets Project. G13. Consideration to award a Contract with All American Asphalt in an amount of $1,120,000 plus 10% contingency for the San Bernardino Road, Church Street, Hellman Avenue and 91" Street Pavement Rehabilitation Projects. G14. Consideration to authorize release of Maintenance Guarantee Bond. No. 08712145 in the amount of $35,728 for the Red Hill Lake Modernization Project, Contract No. 15-248. G15. Consideration to accept Public Improvements on Madrone Avenue South of Arrow Route for Tract 18976 as complete, file the Notice of Completion and authorize Release of Retention and Bonds. G16. Consideration to award a Contract with KDC, Inc. DBA Dynalectric in an amount of $292,324 plus 10% contingency and authorize an appropriation in the amount of $126,585 from the Computer Equipment Replacement Fund for the Arrow Route Street Lights and Fiber Optic Conduit Project. G17. Consideration to award a Contract with Horizons Construction Company International, Inc. in the amount of $104,998 plus a 6% contingency for the Pacific Electric Trail at Victoria Park Lane Tunnel Crossing Protective Fencing Project. G18. Consideration to approve Amendment No.006 authorizing the renewal of the Professional Services Agreement (Co#12-077) with Butsko Utility Design, Inc. for Technical Electrical Engineering Support for Fiscal Year 2017/18. G19. Consideration to approve Amendment No.004 authorizing the renewal of a Professional Services Agreement (CO#13-196) with Industrial Electric Machinery, LLC and an annual Contract Amount increase to $52,000 for tri -annual Maintenance Testing at the Arbors Substation for Fiscal Year 2017/18. G20. Consideration to approve Amendment No.009 authorizing the renewal of a Professional Services Agreement (CO#12-075) with International Line Builders, Inc. for operation and maintenance of the Arbors Substation and Municipal Utilities Electrical Distribution System for Fiscal Year 2017/18. G21. Consideration to accept the Madrone Avenue Street Widening Project along the frontage of Los Amigos Park as complete, approve final contract amount of $473,759, file a Notice of Completion and release bonds accordingly. G22. Consideration to execute a single source Professional Service Agreement with Neighborhood Partnership Housing Services Inc. in an amount not to exceed $186,500 for the completion of the rehabilitation and sell of the Neighborhood Stabilization Program home located at 6948 Spinel Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, CA. G23. Consideration of approval of a reimbursement in the amount of $147,584 to the County of San Bernardino Flood Control District in Accordance with Agreement (CO# 02-139) and the Appropriation of $147,584 from the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Drainage Fund. G24. Consideration to approve Amendment No.007 authorizing an increase to Professional Services Agreement (CO#12-078) to Applied Metering Technologies, Inc. in the amount of $12,310 and **DRAFT** June 21, 20171 Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 6 of 11 authorize an appropriation in the amount of $12,310 from Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility Fund. G25. Consideration to approve the award of a contract for Citywide Janitorial Services in an amount not to exceed $720,000. G26. Consideration to approve the award of a contract for Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance for General Fund, LMD 3A and LMD 3B Parkways, Paseos and Medians to Mariposa Landscapes, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $648,000. G27. Consideration to approve the award of a contract for Park Mowing and Facility Landscape Maintenance to Mariposa Landscapes, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $423,000. G28. Consideration to approve the renewal of the annual contract with LandCare for Maintenance of Parkway, Paseo and Median Landscapes within Landscape Maintenance Districts 9 and 10 in an amount not to exceed $206,000. G29. Consideration to approve the award of a contract for Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance on the Haven Avenue and Foothill Boulevard Medians to Mariposa Landscapes, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $313,000. G30. Consideration to approve the renewal of the annual contract with LandCare for Maintenance of Parkway, Paseo and Median Landscapes within Landscape Maintenance Districts 6, 7 and 8 in an amount not to exceed $635,000. MOTION: Moved by Council Member Williams, seconded by Council Member Alexander, to approve Consent Calendar Items G1 through G30. Motion carried, 4-0-1, Absent Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy. H1. Consideration to conduct Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance No. 909, amending the Terra Vista Community Plan to modify the development standards within the Medium High (MH) District of the Terra Vista Community Plan. ORDINANCE NO. 909 (2"d Reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2016-00715 — A REQUEST TO MODIFY THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS WITHIN THE MEDIUM HIGH (MH) DISTRICT OF THE TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN RELATED TO THE SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW OF A 214 -UNIT MULTI- FAMILY DEVLEOPMENT ON 12.21 ACRES OF LAND WITHIN THE MEDIUM HIGH (MH) DISTRICT (14-24 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF CHURCH STREET AND TERRA VISTA PARKWAY; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF — APN: 1077-42-303 H2. Consideration to conduct Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance No. 910, amending Chapter 3.08 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code as it relates to Professional Service Contracts and Contracts for Public Projects under the Uniform Public Construction Cost Accounting Act. ORDINANCE NO. 910 (2nd Reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE CHAPTER 3.08 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICPAL CODE REGARDING PROFESSIONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS AND CONTRACTS FOR PUBLIC PROJECTS UNDER THE UNIFORM PUBLIC CONSTRUCTION COST ACCOUNTING ACT **DRAFT** June 21, 20171 Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 7 of 11 MOTION: Moved by Council Member Spagnolo, seconded by Council Member Williams, to waive full reading and adopt Ordinance No. 909 and 910. Linda Troyan, City Clerk Services Director, read the title of Ordinance No. 909 and 910. VOTES NOW CAST ON MOTION: Moved by Council Member Spagnolo, seconded by Council Member Williams, to waive full reading and adopt Ordinance No. 909 and 910 by title only. Motion carried, 4-0-1, Absent Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy. 11. Consideration to Conduct First Reading and introduce by title only, Ordinance No. 911 to approve the Local Agency Management Program (LAMP) Ordinance for Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems. ORDINANCE NO. 911 (1St Reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADDING TITLE 19, ARTICLE 28 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ONSITE WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS John Gillison, City Manager, provided a brief introduction to Ordinance No. 911 and introduced Matthew Addington, Associate Engineer, who gave the staff report. Mayor Michael opened the administrative hearing item. No public communications were made. Mayor Michael closed the administrative hearing item. MOTION: Moved by Council Member Williams, seconded by Council Member Spagnolo, to conduct First Reading of Ordinance No. 911 by title only and waive first reading. Linda Troyan, City Clerk Services Director, read the title of Ordinance No. 911. VOTES NOW CAST ON MOTION: Moved by Council Member Williams, seconded by Council Member Spagnolo, to conduct First Reading of Ordinance No. 911 by title only and waive first reading. Motion carried, 4-0-1, Absent Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy. J1. Public Hearing to consider First Reading of Ordinance No. 912, amending Titles 2, 3 and 17 of the Municipal Code to enact requirements and standards for creative place making through Public Art. ORDINANCE NO. 912 (1St Reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA AMENDING THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING CREATIVE PLACEMAKING AND PUBLIC ART John Gillison, City Manager, provided a brief introduction to Ordinance No. 912 and introduced Jennifer Nakamura, Associate Planner, who gave the staff report. Discussion ensued on costs outlined in the Ordinance; and maintaining public art. Mayor Michael opened the administrative hearing item. **DRAFT** June 21, 20171 Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 8 of 11 John Machado spoke in support of Ordinance No. 912 and asked the City Council to consider appointing him on the Public Art Committee. Mayor Michael closed the administrative hearing. City Manager Gillison announced that there will be public outreach for recruitment on the Public Art Committee. MOTION: Moved by Council Member Spagnolo, seconded by Council Member Williams, to conduct First Reading of Ordinance No. 912 by title only and waive full reading. Linda Troyan, City Clerk Services Director, read the title of Ordinance No. 912. VOTES NOW CAST ON MOTION: Moved by Council Member Spagnolo, seconded by Council Member Williams, to conduct First Reading of Ordinance No. 912 by title only and waive full reading. Motion carried, 4-0-1, Absent Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy. J2. Public Hearing to consider adoption of Resolution No. 17-053, adjusting Parking Citation Fees for the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department. RESOLUTION NO. 17-053 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADJUSTING PARKING CITATION FEES FOR THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA POLICE DEPARTMENT City Manager Gillison introduced Chief of Police Danielle Boldt and Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services, who gave the staff report. Mayor Michael declared the Public Hearing open. There were no public communications made. Mayor Michael closed the Public Hearing. MOTION: Moved by Council Member Spagnolo, seconded by Council Member Alexander, to adopt Resolution No. 17-053. Motion carried, 4-0-1, Absent Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy. K1. Consideration to adopt the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility Electric Vehicle Commercial Charger Rebate Program. City Manager Gillison introduced Deborah Allen, Management Aide and Fred Lynn, Utility Division Manager, who gave the staff report. MOTION: Moved by Council Member Spagnolo, seconded by Council Member Williams, to adopt the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility Electric Vehicle Commercial Charger Rebate Program. Motion carried, 4-0-1, Absent Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy. K2. Consideration to approve a contract with EVgo Services for the installation of an Electric Vehicle (EV) Level 3 DC Fast Charging Station provided through a grant from the South Coast Air Quality Management District and approve amendments to the Victoria Gardens Public Parking Facilities Ground Lease and Operating Agreements. City Manager Gillison introduced Deborah Allen, Management Aide and Fabian Villenas, Principal Management Analyst, who gave the staff report. **DRAFT** June 21, 20171 Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 9 of 11 MOTION: Moved by Council Member Spagnolo, seconded by Council Member Alexander, to approve a contract with EVgo Services for the installation of an Electric Vehicle (EV) Level 3 DC Fast Charging Station. Motion carried, 4-0-1, Absent Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy. K3. Consideration to adopt Resolution No. 17-054, Establishing a Partnership with Grid Alternatives to Promote Community Participation in their No -Cost Solar Installation Program for Low -Income Homeowners and Waive Solar Permit Fees. RESOLUTION NO. 17-054 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A PARTNERSHIP WITH GRID ALTERNATIVES TO PROMOTE COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION IN THEIR NO -COST SOLAR INSTALLATION PROGRAM FOR LOW-INCOME HOMEOWNERS AND WAIVE SOLAR PERMIT FEES City Manager Gillison introduced Fabian Villenas, Principal Management Analyst, and Deborah Allen, Management Aide, who gave the staff report. A video presentation was made by Bambi Tran from Grid Alternatives. MOTION: Moved by Council Member Alexander, seconded by Council Member Williams, to adopt Resolution No. 17-054. Motion carried, 4-0-1, Absent Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy. K4. Consideration of approval of a Resolution adopting salary schedules for Fiscal Year 2017-18. RESOLUTION NO. 17-055 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE SALARY SCHEDULES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 City Manager Gillison introduced Robert Neiuber, Human Resources Director, who gave the staff report. Human Resources Director Neiuber reported that the item was placed under this section due to a change in the law and includes changes adopted through Memorandum of Understandings and contracts with all bargaining units in the city. MOTION: Moved by Council Member Spagnolo, seconded by Council Member Williams, to adopt Resolution No. 17-055. Motion carried, 4-0-1, Absent Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy. L1. Consideration to designate a Voting Delegate and Alternates for the League of California Cities Annual Business Meeting. MOTION: Moved by Council Member Spagnolo, seconded by Council Member Williams, to approve Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy as Voting Delegate and Council Member Spagnolo and Mayor Michael as Alternates for the League of California Cities Annual Business Meeting. Motion carried, 4-0-1, Absent Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy L2. Consideration of the City Council Library Subcommittee's recommendation regarding reappointments to the Library Board of Trustees. MOTION: Moved by Council Member Spagnolo, seconded by Council Member Alexander, to approve the reappointment of Christine DeVries and Sarah Tomkins to a four year term to the Library Board of Trustees. Motion carried, 4-0-1, Absent Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy. L3. Consideration of the City Council Library Subcommittee's recommendation regarding reappointments to the Library Foundation Board. **DRAFT** June 21, 20171 Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 10 of 11 MOTION: Moved by Council Member Spagnolo, seconded by Council Member Alexander, to approve the reappointment of Tina Gilfry, David Gonzalez and Kristine Scott to a four year term to the Library Foundation Board. Motion carried, 4-0-1, Absent Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy. L4. Consideration of the City Council West -Side Districts Subcommittee's recommendation regarding appointment to the West -Side Districts Citizens' Oversight Committee. MOTION: Moved by Council Member Williams, seconded by Council Member Spagnolo, to approve the appointment of Janet Ryerson to the West -Side Districts Citizen's Oversight Committee. Motion carried, 4-0-1, Absent Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy. L5. INTER -AGENCY UPDATES (Update by the City Council to the community on the meetings that were attended.) Council Member Williams reported that she attended a grand opening and anniversary for the Gerdau Steel Mill Company. L6. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS(Comments to be limited to three minutes per Council Member.) None. None. Mayor Michael adjourned the meeting at 8:40 p.m. Approved:*************** Respectfully submitted, Linda A. Troyan, MMC City Clerk Services Director **DRAFT** June 21, 20171 Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 11 of 11 June 22, 2017 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND THE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT A Special Meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council and Fire Protection District was held on Thursday, June 22, 2017 in the Council Chambers, City Hall, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730. Mayor/President L. Dennis Michael called the meeting to order at 3:00 p.m. Council Member Spagnolo led the Pledge of Allegiance. Present were Council Members Alexander, Spagnolo, Williams and Mayor Michael. Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy was absent. There were no public comments. Consideration to approve the following to be in compliance with Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement No. 54: 1) Updated Fund Balance Policy and 2) a Resolution committing to the level of fiscal reserves for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. RESOLUTION NO. FD- 17-008 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, COMMITTING TO THE LEVEL OF FISCAL RESERVES FOR THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT MOTION: Moved by Board Member Spagnolo, seconded by Board Member Williams, to approve Consent Calendar Item C1. Motion carried, 4-0-1, Absent Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy. Consideration to approve the updated City General Fund Reserve Funding Goals Policy. 2. Consideration to approve the General Fund Subsidy to Special Districts Policy. 3. Consideration to approve the following to be in compliance with Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement No. 54: 1) Updated Fund Balance Policy and 2) a Resolution committing to the level of fiscal reserves for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. RESOLUTION NO. 17-056 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, COMMITTING TO THE LEVEL OF FISCAL RESERVES FOR THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 4. Consideration to approve the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for Fiscal Year 2017/2018. DRAFT June 22, 2017 1 City Council and Fire Protection District Special Meeting Minutes I Page 1 of 3 5. Consideration to approve and authorize the execution of a contract with Tanko Streetlighting Inc. in the amount of $3,064,486 for the LED Streetlight Renovation and Maintenance Services in accordance with RFP #17/18-001. MOTION: Moved by Council Member Williams, seconded by Council Member Spagnolo, to approve Consent Calendar Item C1 through C5. Motion carried, 4-0-1, Absent Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy. Consideration to adopt Resolution No. FD 17-009, approving the Fire District General Fund Preliminary Budget, adopting the appropriations limit for Fiscal Year 2017/18, and setting approval of a Final Budget for July 19, 2017. RESOLUTION NO. FD 17-009 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A GENERAL FUND APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017/2018 PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XIIIB OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION MOTION: Moved by Board Member Spagnolo, seconded by Board Member Alexander, to approve Resolution No. FD 17-009. Motion carried, 4-0-1, Absent Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy. 2. Consideration to adopt Resolutions adopting a Budget in the amount of $2,318,600 and approving the appropriation limit in the amount of $3,552,682 for FY 2017/18 in Community Facilities District (CFD) No. 88-1. RESOLUTION NO. FD 17-010 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND ADOPTING A BUDGET FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017/18 RESOLUTION NO. FD 17- 011 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017/18 PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XIIIB OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION 3. Consideration to adopt Resolutions adopting a budget in the amount of $6,032,450 and approving the appropriations limit in the amount of $14,313,489 for FY 2017/18 in Community Facilities District (CFD) No.85-1. RESOLUTION NO. FD 17-012 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND ADOPTING A BUDGET FOR MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017/18 RESOLUTION NO. FD 17-013 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017/18 PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XIIIB OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION MOTION: Moved by Board Member Alexander, seconded by Board Member Williams, to approve Resolution No. FD 17-010, 17-011, 17-012, 17-013. Motion carried, 4-0-1, Absent Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy. DRAFT June 22, 2017 1 City Council and Fire Protection District Special Meeting Minutes I Page 2 of 3 Consideration to adopt the Fiscal Year 2017/18 Budget and Article XIIIB Appropriations Limit. RESOLUTION NO. 17-057 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE CITY'S FISCAL YEAR 2017/18 BUDGET RESOLUTION NO. 17-058 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING AN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XIIIB OF THE CALIFORNIA STATE CONSTITUTION FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017/18 MOTION: Moved by Council Member Williams, seconded by Council Member Spagnolo, to approve Resolution No. FD 17-57 and No. FD 17-058. Motion carried, 4-0-1, Absent Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy. Mayor/President Michael adjourned the meeting at 3:07 p.m. Approved: *********** Respectfully submitted, Linda A. Troyan, MMC City Clerk Services Director DRAFT June 22, 2017 1 City Council and Fire Protection District Special Meeting Minutes I Page 3 of 3 @CITYOFRC Rancho Cucamonga, CA E s a What Works cites What Works Cities I �� RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • ir- pIa. Ell — T Works Cit I,.� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA @CITYOFRC Rancho Cucamonga, CA E s a What Works cites What Works Cities I �� RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P1 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 6/13/2017 through 7/10/2017 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00007110 06/14/2017 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC. 68,350.14 0.00 68,350.14 AP 00007111 06/14/2017 MICHAEL, L. DENNIS 946.11 0.00 946.11 AP 00007112 06/14/2017 POWEREX CORP 1,988.78 0.00 1.988.78 AP 00007113 06/21/2017 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC. 12,301.88 0.00 12.301.88 AP 00007114 06/21/2017 CALIF GOVERNMENT VEBA/RANCHO CUCAMONGA 11.420.00 0.00 11,420.00 AP 00007115 06/21/2017 NEW HORIZONS CLC OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 2,040.00 0.00 2,040.00 AP 00007116 06/21/2017 NORMAN A TRAUB ASSOCIATES 4,197.30 0.00 4.197.30 AP 00007117 06/21/2017 RCCEA 1,784.50 0.00 1,784.50 AP 00007118 06/21/2017 RCPFA 11,512.37 0.00 11,512.37 AP 00007119 06/21/2017 RE ASTORIA 2 LLC 79,576.18 0.00 79.576.18 AP 00007120 06/27/2017 AHUMADA, ALEXANDER R 0.00 651.52 651.52 AP 00007121 06/27/2017 ALMAND, LLOYD 0.00 651.52 651.52 Al' 00007122 06/27/2017 BANTAU, VICTORIA 0.00 651.52 651.52 AP 00007123 06/27/2017 BAZAL, SUSAN 0.00 1,020.45 1,020.45 AP 00007124 06/27/2017 BELL, MICHAEL L. 0.00 1,303.76 1.303.76 AP 00007125 06/27/2017 BERRY, DAVID 0.00 1,019.78 1,019.78 All 00007126 06/27/2017 BROCK, ROBIN 0.00 977.64 977.64 AP 00007127 06/27/2017 CAMPBELL, GERALD 0.00 746.37 746.37 AP 00007128 06/27/2017 CAMPBELL, STEVEN 0.00 1,407.17 1.407.17 All 00007129 06/27/2017 CARNES, KENNETH 0.00 472.96 472.96 AP 00007130 06/27/2017 CLABBY, RICHARD 0.00 1,019.78 1,019.78 AP 00007131 06/27/2017 CORCORAN. ROBERT 0.00 587.88 587.88 All 00007132 06/27/2017 COX, KARL 0.00 651.52 651.52 AP 00007133 06/27/2017 CRANE, RALPH 0.00 1,020.45 1.020.45 AP 00007134 06/27/2017 CROSSLAND, WILBUR 0.00 472.96 472.96 AP 00007135 06/27/2017 DAGUE, JAMES 0.00 1,303.76 1,303.76 AP 00007136 06/27/2017 DE ANTONIO, SUSAN 0.00 587.88 587.88 AP 00007137 06/27/2017 DEANS, JACKIE 0.00 630.69 630.69 AP 00007138 06/27/2017 DOMINICK, SAMUEL A. 0.00 977.64 977.64 AP 00007139 06/27/2017 EAGLESON, MICHAEL 0.00 1,303.76 1.303.76 AP 00007140 06/27/2017 EGGERS, BOB 0.00 1,733.29 1,733.29 AP 00007141 06/27/2017 FRITCHEY, JOHN D. 0.00 472.96 472.96 AP 00007142 06/27/2017 HEYDE, DONALD 0.00 1,303.76 1.303.76 AP 00007143 06/27/2017 INTERLICCHIA, ROSALYN 0.00 587.88 587.88 All 00007144 06/27/2017 KILMER, STEPHEN 0.00 1,364.11 1.364.11 AP 00007145 06/27/2017 LANE, WILLIAM 0.00 1,303.76 1.303.76 AP 00007146 06/27/2017 LEE, ALLAN J. 0.00 1,300.86 1.300.86 AP 00007147 06/27/2017 LENZE, PAUL E 0.00 1.223.96 1,223.96 AP 00007148 06/27/2017 LONGO, JOE 0.00 172.48 172.48 AI' 00007149 06/27/2017 LUTTRULL, DARRELL 0.00 472.96 472.96 AP 00007150 06/27/2017 MACKALL, BEVERLY 0.00 445.89 445.89 AP 00007151 06/27/2017 MAYFIELD, RON 0.00 11389.38 1,389.38 AP 00007152 06/27/2017 MCKEE, JOHN 0.00 651.52 651.52 AP 00007153 06/27/2017 MCNEIL, KENNETH 0.00 651.52 651.52 All 00007154 06/27/2017 MICHAEL, L. DENNIS 0.00 977.64 977.64 AP 00007155 06/27/2017 MORGAN, BYRON 0.00 2,317.74 2,317.74 AP 00007156 06/27/2017 MYSKOW, DENNIS 0.00 1,019.78 1,019.78 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 1 Current Date, 07/11/2017 Report: CK -AGENDA -REG -PORTRAIT -CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 15:32:57 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P2 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Redster 6/13/2017 through 7/10/2017 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Citv Fire Amount A1' 00007157 06/27/2017 NAUMAN, MICHAEL 0.00 472.96 472.96 AP 00007158 06/27/2017 NEE, RON 0.00 630.69 630.69 AP 00007159 06/27/2017 NELSON, MARY JANE 0.00 172.48 172.48 AP 00007160 06/27/2017 O'BRIEN, TOM 0.00 1,733.29 1,733.29 AP 00007161 06/27/2017 PLOUNG, MICHAEL J 0.00 579.26 579.26 AP 00007162 06/27/2017 POST, MICHAEL R 0.00 1,628.59 1,628.59 AP 00007163 06/27/2017 PROULX, PATRICK 0.00 1,733.29 1,733.29 AP 00007164 06/27/2017 ROEDER, JEFF 0.00 1,303.76 1,303.76 All 00007165 06/27/2017 SALISBURY, THOMAS 0.00 651.52 651.52 AP 00007166 06/27/2017 SMITH, RONALD 0.00 472.96 472.96 AP 00007167 06/27/2017 SPAGNOLO, SAM 0.00 472.96 472.96 AP 00007168 06/27/2017 SPAIN, WILLIAM 0.00 746.37 746.37 AP 00007169 06/27/2017 SULLIVAN, JAMES 0.00 472.96 472.96 AP 00007170 06/27/2017 TAYLOR, STEVE 0.00 1,629.55 1,629.55 AP 00007171 06/27/2017 TULEY, TERRY 0.00 1,303.76 1.303.76 AP 00007172 06/27/2017 VANDERKALLEN, FRANCIS 0.00 1,064.00 1,064.00 AP 00007173 06/27/2017 WALTON, KEVIN 0.00 1,364.11 1,364.11 AP 00007174 06/27/2017 YOWELL, TIMOTHY A 0.00 1,389.38 1,389.38 AP 00007175 06/28/2017 CALIF GOVERNMENT VEBA/RANCHO CUCAMONGA 21,264.72 0.00 21,264.72 AP 00007176 06/28/2017 CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HS DISTRICT 1,798.08 0.00 1.798.08 All 00007177 06/28/2017 EMPIRE COACH ROYAL LLC 7,945.00 0.00 7,945.00 A1' 00007178 06/28/2017 RCPFA 31.14 0.00 31.14 AP 00007179 07/05/2017 HD PRODUCTIONS INC 6,250.00 0.00 6,250.00 AP 00007180 07/05/2017 LANDCARE USA LLC 11,948.89 0.00 11,948.89 AP 00007181 07/05/2017 CALIF GOVERNMENT VEBA/RANCHO CUCAMONGA 11,495.00 0.00 11,495.00 AP 00007182 07/05/2017 RCCEA 1,766.50 0.00 1,766.50 AP 00007183 07/05/2017 RCPFA 11,433.19 0.00 11,433.19 AP 00380719 06/14/2017 IUP GRAPHICS 0.00 60.49 60.49 AI' 00380720 06/14/2017 A & M FIRST AID INC 2,252.62 0.00 2,252.62 AP 00380721 06/14/2017 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 99.80 0.00 99.80 AP 00380722 06/14/2017 ABLE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 39,330.81 0.00 39,330.81 AP 00380723 06/14/2017 ACTION AWARDS INC. 1,224.07 0.00 1,224.07 AP 00380724 06/14/2017 ADAMSON INDUSTRIES 187.35 0.00 187.35 AP 00380725 06/14/2017 AFLAC GROUP INSURANCE 10,433.79 0.00 10,433.79 AI' 00380726 06/14/2017 AFLAC GROUP INSURANCE 6,955.86 0.00 6,955.86 AP 00380727 06/14/2017 AIR EXCHANGE INC 0.00 4,189.32 4,189.32 AP 00380728 06/14/2017 ALL WELDING 4,174.24 0.00 4,174.24 AP 00380729 06/14/2017 ALLIED UNIVERSAL SECURITY SERVICES 12,615.36 0.00 12,615.36 AP 00380730 06/14/2017 AMERICAN REGISTRY FOR INTERNET NUMBERS LTD 100.00 0.00 100.00 AP 00380731 06/14/2017 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 760.00 0.00 760.00 AP 00380732 06/14/2017 ARCHIBALD PET HOSPITAL 100.00 0.00 100.00 AP 00380733 06/14/2017 ART OF LIVING FOUNDATION 90.00 0.00 90.00 AP 00380734 06/14/2017 AT&T MOBILITY 0.00 84.00 84.00 AP 00380735 06/14/2017 AUFBAU CORPORATION 940.00 0.00 940.00 AP 00380736 06/14/2017 AUNTIE M CREATIVE CONSULTANTS INC. 3,676.76 0.00 3,676.76 AP 00380737 06/14/2017 BAILEY, LEKISHA 5.20 0.00 5.20 AP 00380738 06/14/2017 BARNES AND NOBLE 583.98 0.00 583.98 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 2 Current Date: 07/11/2017 Report: CK -AGENDA -REG- PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 15:32:57 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P3 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Aunda Check Register 6/13/2017 through 7/10/2017 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00380739 06/14/2017 BARR & CLARK INC. 375.00 0.00 375.00 AP 00380740 06/14/2017 BASELINE ANIMAL HOSPITAL 200.00 0.00 200.00 AP 00380741 06/14/2017 BAUGHMAN, LOGAN 44.50 0.00 44.50 AP 00380742 06/14/2017 BELTRAN, OSBALDO ALVARADO 540.00 0.00 540.00 AP 00380743 06/14/2017 BRODZINSKI, JONNY 11.84 0.00 11.84 AP 00380744 06/14/2017 BUTSKO UTILITY DESIGN INC. 4,408.92 0.00 41408.92 AP 00380747 06/14/2017 C V W D 53,135.12 448.27 53,583.39 *** AP 00380748 06/14/2017 C.P. GENERATOR INC. 51.72 0.00 51.72 AP 00380749 06/14/2017 CAL PERS LONG TERM CARE 286.21 0.00 286.21 AP 00380750 06/14/2017 CAPITAL ONE COMMERCIAL 1.396.40 45.25 1.441.65 *** AP 00380751 06/14/2017 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 0.00 167.23 167.23 AP 00380752 06/14/2017 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 4,263.26 0.00 4,263.26 AP 00380753 06/14/2017 CHUNXIA, JIANG 52.76 0.00 52.76 AP 00380754 06/14/2017 CINTAS CORPORATION #150 1,471.26 93.45 1,564.71 *** AP 00380755 06/14/2017 CLASSE PARTY RENTALS 835.80 0.00 835.80 AP 00380756 06/14/2017 CLIMATEC LLC 888.78 0.00 888.78 AP 00380757 06/14/2017 CONVERGEONE INC. 46,191.31 0.00 46,191.31 AP 00380758 06/14/2017 COPPER CANYON BAND 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00380759 06/14/2017 CORELOGIC SOLUTIONS LLC 250.00 0.00 250.00 AP 00380760 06/14/2017 CREATIVE BRAIN LEARNING 1,386.00 0.00 1,386.00 AP 00380761 06/14/2017 D & D SERVICES INC. 430.00 0.00 430.00 AP 00380762 06/14/2017 DAWSON SURVEYING INC. 16,000.00 0.00 16,000.00 AP 00380763 06/14/2017 DELTA DENTAL 1,361.00 0.00 1,361.00 AP 00380764 06/14/2017 DELTA DENTAL 41,248.10 0.00 41,248.10 AP 00380765 06/14/2017 DUMBELL MAN FITNESS EQUIPMENT, THE 0.00 241.98 241.98 All 00380766 06/14/2017 ENVIRONMENTAL RECOVERY SERVICES INC. 3,500.21 0.00 31500.21 AP 00380767 06/14/2017 EREDIA, PATRICIA MORGAN 243.00 0.00 243.00 AP 00380768 06/14/2017 ERICKSON HALL CONSTRUCTION 0.00 112,411.41 112,411.41 AP 00380769 06/14/2017 EXPERIAN 52.00 0.00 52.00 AP 00380770 06/14/2017 EXPRESS BRAKE SUPPLY 64.64 0.00 64.64 AP 00380771 06/14/2017 FAIRVIEW FORD 368.09 0.00 368.09 AP 00380772 06/14/2017 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 229.14 0.00 229.14 AP 00380773 06/14/2017 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 19.43 0.00 19.43 AP 00380774 06/14/2017 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 175.16 0.00 175.16 AP 00380775 06/14/2017 FERRER, GABRIEL 0.00 261.00 261.00 AP 00380776 06/14/2017 FIRST CLASS HEATING & AIR 1,700.00 0.00 1,700.00 AP 00380777 06/14/2017 FIRST CLASS HEATING & AIR 2,300.00 0.00 2,300.00 AP 00380778 06/14/2017 FLAG SYSTEMS INC. 1,550.00 0.00 1,550.00 AP 00380779 06/14/2017 FRANCO, JENNIER 825.00 0.00 825.00 AP 00380780 06/14/2017 FRONTIER COMM 1,482.56 0.00 1,482.56 AP 00380781 06/14/2017 G AND M BUSINESS INTERIORS 5,191.72 0.00 5,191.72 AP 00380782 06/14/2017 GALE/CENGAGE LEARNING 1,880.29 0.00 1,880.29 AP 00380783 06/14/2017 GALLAGHER, PATRICK 886.54 0.00 886.54 AP 00380784 06/14/2017 GATEWAY PET CEMETERY AND CREMATORY 240.00 0.00 240.00 AP 00380785 06/14/2017 GLOBALSTAR USA 339.49 0.00 339.49 AP 00380786 06/14/2017 GOOD YEAR TIRE AND RUBBER CO. 572.43 1.008.14 1_.580.57 *** AP 00380787 06/14/2017 GRAINGER 43.10 742.08 785.18 *** User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 3 Current Date: 07/11/2017 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 15:32:57 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P4 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 6/13/2017 through 7/10/2017 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Citi fire Amount AP 00380788 06/14/2017 GRAPHICS FACTORY INC. 2.150.69 0.00 2.150.69 AP 00380789 06/14/2017 GRAVES & KING LLP 644.41 0.00 644.41 AP 00380790 06/14/2017 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO 2,051.78 0.00 2.051.78 AP 00380791 06/14/2017 HEARTSAVERS LLC 240.00 0.00 240.00 AP 00380792 06/14/2017 HEILIG, KELLY 225.00 0.00 225.00 AP 00380793 06/14/2017 HI WAY SAFETY INC 1,218.99 0.00 1,218.99 AP 00380794 06/14/2017 HILLS PET NUTRITION SALES INC 710.59 0.00 710.59 AP 00380795 06/14/2017 HMC ARCHITECTS 0.00 19,653.00 19.653.00 AP 00380796 06/14/2017 HOYT LUMBER CO., SM 0.00 24.59 24.59 AP 00380797 06/14/2017 HPI INTERNATIONAL INC 20,869.02 0.00 20,869.02 AP 00380798 06/14/2017 HUNTINGTON HARDWARE 1,273.31 0.00 1,273.31 AP 00380799 06/14/2017 IMPRESSIONS GOURMET CATERING 937.43 0.00 937.43 AP 00380800 06/14/2017 INLAND EMPIRE PROPERTY SERVICES INC 0.00 3,025.00 3,025.00 AP 00380801 06/14/2017 INLAND EMPIRE TOURS AND TRANSPORTATION 1,325.50 0.00 1,325.50 AP 00380802 06/14/2017 INPRO CORPORATION 306.39 0.00 306.39 AP 00380803 06/14/2017 INTELESYS ONE INC 72,565.30 38,447.00 111.012.30 *** AP 00380804 06/14/2017 INTERACTIVE DATA PRICING AND REFERENCE DATA 126.87 0.00 126.87 AI' 00380805 06/14/2017 INTERNATIONAL LINE BUILDERS INC 189,263.40 0.00 189,263.40 AP 00380806 06/14/2017 J AND S STRIPING CO INC 23,140.07 0.00 23.140.07 AP 00380807 06/14/2017 JOHN BURR CYCLES INC 1,245.74 0.00 1,245.74 AP 00380808 06/14/2017 JOHNNY ALLEN TENNIS ACADEMY 159.00 0.00 159.00 AP 00380809 06/14/2017 JONES AND MAYER, LAW OFFICES OF 176.00 0.00 176.00 AP 00380810 06/14/2017 JRC HOUSING 3,995.00 0.00 3,995.00 AP 00380811 06/14/2017 JRC HOUSING 2,995.00 0.00 2,995.00 AP 00380812 06/14/2017 K -K WOODWORKING 21.53 0.00 21.53 AP 00380813 06/14/2017 KVAC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES INC 0.00 763.50 763.50 AP 00380814 06/14/2017 LANCE SOLL AND LUNGHARD 17,500.00 0.00 17,500.00 AP 00380815 06/14/2017 LANTAI, KRIS 300.00 0.00 300.00 AP 00380816 06/14/2017 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 0.00 107.36 107.36 AP 00380817 06/14/2017 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 1,544.80 0.00 1,544.80 All 00380818 06/14/2017 LIFE ASSIST INC 0.00 1,737.43 1,737.43 AP 00380819 06/14/2017 MAIN STREET SIGNS 200.00 0.00 200.00 AI' 00380820 06/14/2017 MARIPOSA LANDSCAPES INC 29,131.64 2,052.85 31,184.49 *** AP 00380821 06/14/2017 MARK CHRISTOPHER INC 400.36 124.52 524.88 *** A1' 00380822 06/14/2017 MARLINK SA INC 0.00 162.00 162.00 AP 00380823 06/14/2017 MARQUEZ, EMMANUEL E 531.00 0.00 531.00 AP 00380824 06/14/2017 MARSHALL, TERRY 95.39 0.00 95.39 AP 00380825 06/14/2017 MARTINEZ TOWING 175.00 0.00 175.00 AP 00380826 06/14/2017 MATANGA, JULIE EDWARD 229.50 0.00 229.50 AP 00380827 06/14/2017 MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 980.41 0.00 980.41 AP 00380828 06/14/2017 MEDIWASTE DISPOSAL 95.25 0.00 95.25 AP 00380829 06/14/2017 MEDLEY FIRE PROTECTION INC 0.00 180.03 180.03 AP 00380830 06/14/2017 MIDWEST MOTOR SUPPLY 633.43 0.00 633.43 AP 00380831 06/14/2017 MIDWEST TAPE 762.11 0.00 762.11 AP 00380832 06/14/2017 MIJAC ALARM COMPANY 102.00 0.00 102.00 AP 00380833 06/14/2017 MINUTEMAN PRESS 151.93 0.00 151.93 AP 00380834 06/14/2017 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 38.00 0.00 38.00 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 4 Current Date: 07/11/2017 Report: CK -AGENDA -REG PORTRAIT -CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait L Time: 15:32:57 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P5 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 6/13/2017 through 7/10/2017 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Citv Fire Amount AP 00380835 06/14/2017 MSA INLAND EMPIRE/DESERT CHAPTER 175.00 0.00 175.00 AP 00380836 06/14/2017 MSNOC INC 1,580.00 0.00 1.580.00 AP 00380837 06/14/2017 NAPA AUTO PARTS 32.66 89.45 122.11 *** AP 00380838 06/14/2017 NAVARRO, JOSE 3,036.00 0.00 3.036.00 AP 00380839 06/14/2017 NEIUBER, ROBERT 208.00 0.00 208.00 AP 00380840 06/14/2017 NEWCO DISTRIBUTORS INC 859.68 0.00 859.68 AP 00380841 06/14/2017 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CTRS OF CA 3,519.50 0.00 3,519.50 AP 00380842 06/14/2017 ONTARIO WINNELSON CO 81.87 0.00 81.87 AP 00380843 06/14/2017 ONTARIO, CITY OF 9,492.22 0.00 9.492.22 AP 00380844 06/14/2017 ONTRAC 69.18 0.00 69.18 AP 00380845 06/14/2017 PACIFIC UTILITY INSTALLATION INC 133,492.00 0.00 133,492.00 AP 00380846 06/14/2017 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 401.77 0.00 401.77 AP 00380847 06/14/2017 PHOENIX GROUP INFORMATION SYSTEMS 2,598.57 0.00 2,598.57 AP 00380848 06/14/2017 PINNACLE TEXTILE INDUSTRIES LLC 272.96 0.00 272.96 AP 00380849 06/14/2017 PRISTINE UNIFORMS LLC 447.06 0.00 447.06 AP 00380850 06/14/2017 PRO SPRAY INC 270.00 0.00 270.00 AP 00380851 06/14/2017 PSA PRINT GROUP 232.74 38.79 271.53 *** AP 00380852 06/14/2017 PW GILLIBRAND INC 1,689.03 0.00 1,689.03 AP 00380853 06/14/2017 QUALITY TRUCK ELECTRIC INC 0.00 915.88 915.88 AP 00380854 06/14/2017 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FONTANA FAMILY YMCA 10,383.85 0.00 10,383.85 AP 00380855 06/14/2017 RICHARD HEATH AND ASSOCIATES 7,551.46 0.00 7,551.46 AP 00380856 06/14/2017 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 47,665.06 1,929.00 49,594.06 *** AP 00380857 06/14/2017 RODMAN, JERII E 150.00 0.00 150.00 AP 00380858 06/14/2017 RODRIGUEZ INC, RY 0.00 1,509.76 1,509.76 AP 00380859 06/14/2017 ROTO ROOTER 2,062.50 2,382.67 4,445.17 *** AP 00380860 06/14/2017 ROYAL WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 2,667.57 0.00 2,667.57 AP 00380861 06/14/2017 RUBENS AUTO COLLISION CENTER 953.66 0.00 953.66 AP 00380862 06/14/2017 SAFELITE FULFILLMENT INC 59.95 0.00 59.95 AP 00380863 06/14/2017 SAFEWAY SIGN COMPANY 5,422.42 0.00 5,422.42 AP 00380864 06/14/2017 SAN BERNARDINO CO AUDITOR CONT 7,700.50 0.00 7,700.50 AP 00380865 06/14/2017 SAN BERNARDINO CO FIRE DEPT 175.00 0.00 175.00 AP 00380866 06/14/2017 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT 3,890.00 0.00 3,890.00 AP 00380867 06/14/2017 SAN BERNARDINO CTY FIRE CHIEF ASSOC 0.00 135.00 135.00 AP 00380868 06/14/2017 SAN BERNARDINO CTY REAL ESTATE SVCS DEPT 9,724.00 0.00 9,724.00 AP 00380869 06/14/2017 SAN BERNARDINO CTY SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOO 1,801.00 0.00 1,801.00 AP 00380870 06/14/2017 SAN BERNARDINO, CITY OF 3,311.66 0.00 3,311.66 AP 00380871 06/14/2017 SC FUELS 19,929.04 0.00 19,929.04 AP 00380872 06/14/2017 SCOTT, APRIL 432.00 0.00 432.00 AP 00380873 06/14/2017 SCOTT, MICHAEL 28.00 0.00 28.00 AP 00380874 06/14/2017 SEANEZ, CARLOS 97.11 0.00 97.11 AP 00380875 06/14/2017 SERRATO & ASSOCIATES 980.00 0.00 980.00 AP 00380876 06/14/2017 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO, THE 65.51 0.00 65.51 AP 00380877 06/14/2017 SHOETERIA 646.04 0.00 646.04 AP 00380878 06/14/2017 SHRED PROS 65.00 0.00 65.00 AP 00380879 06/14/2017 SHY, YIH LIN NIEN 51.69 0.00 51.69 AP 00380880 06/14/2017 SNYDER, MAKENZIE 0.00 120.00 120.00 AP 00380881 06/14/2017 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 1,183.72 0.00 1,183.72 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 5 Current Date: 07/11/2017 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 15:32:57 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P6 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 6/13/2017 through 7/10/2017 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Cit v Fire Amount AP 00380882 06/14/2017 SOFTWARE ONE 115,715.98 0.00 115.715.98 AP 00380883 06/14/2017 SOLAR CITY CORPORATION 248,367.03 66,434.90 314.801.93 *** AP 00380884 06/14/2017 SOUTH BAY FOUNDRY INC 1,065.75 0.00 1,065.75 AP 00380885 06/14/2017 SOUTH COAST AQMD 376.41 0.00 376.41 AP 00380890 06/14/2017 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 155,432.34 0.00 155.432.34 AP 00380891 06/14/2017 SPRINT 0.00 131.97 131.97 AP 00380892 06/14/2017 SPROUT SOCIAL INC 4,500.00 0.00 4.500.00 AP 00380893 06/14/2017 STATEWIDE TRAFFIC SAFETY & SIGNS INC 8,847.65 0.00 8.847.65 AP 00380894 06/14/2017 STORAGE CONTAINER.COM 132.00 0.00 132.00 AP 00380895 06/14/2017 SUPERION LLC 2,563.20 0.00 2.563.20 AP 00380896 06/14/2017 SWIFTY SIGN 0.00 120.68 120.68 AP 00380897 06/14/2017 SZABO, JAMES 49.88 0.00 49.88 AP 00380898 06/14/2017 TAM, DERRICK 2,031.00 0.00 2,031.00 AP 00380899 06/14/2017 TAYLOR, RUFUS 47.28 0.00 47.28 AP 00380900 06/14/2017 THEATRE COMMUNICATIONS GROUP 632.68 0.00 632.68 AP 00380901 06/14/2017 TUMBLEWEED PRESS INC 838.60 0.00 838.60 AP 00380902 06/14/2017 U.S. BANK PARS ACCT #6746022500 573.92 0.00 573.92 AP 00380903 06/14/2017 U.S. BANK PARS ACCT #6746022500 9,537.88 0.00 9.537.88 AP 00380904 06/14/2017 UNITED PACIFIC SERVICES INC 7,027.00 0.00 7.027.00 AP 00380905 06/14/2017 UNITED SITE SERVICES OF CA INC 229.98 0.00 229.98 A13 00380906 06/14/2017 UPS 60.38 0.00 60.38 AP 00380907 06/14/2017 UPSCO POWERSAFE SYSTEMS INC 1,151.68 0.00 1,151.68 AP 00380912 06/14/2017 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 5,767.07 0.00 5,767.07 AP 00380913 06/14/2017 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 100.59 0.00 100.59 AP 00380914 06/14/2017 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 60.12 0.00 60.12 AP 00380915 06/14/2017 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 0.00 2,955.75 2,955.75 AP 00380916 06/14/2017 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 182.75 0.00 182.75 AP 00380917 06/14/2017 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 573.15 0.00 573.15 AP 00380918 06/14/2017 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 10.78 0.00 10.78 AP 00380919 06/14/2017 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 118.18 0.00 118.18 AP 00380920 06/14/2017 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 5,085.08 0.00 5,085.08 AP 00380921 06/14/2017 VISION COMMUNICATIONS CO 750.00 0.00 750.00 AP 00380922 06/14/2017 VORTEX INDUSTRIES INC 8,964.00 444.00 91408.00 *** AP 00380923 06/14/2017 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 3,154.60 0.00 31154.60 AP 00380924 06/14/2017 WEBBER, DEBORAH 28.21 0.00 28.21 AP 00380925 06/14/2017 WEST COAST LIGHTS & SIRENS 0.00 405.76 405.76 AP 00380926 06/14/2017 WEST END MATERIAL SUPPLY 0.00 74.50 74.50 AP 00380927 06/14/2017 WHITE CAP CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY 45.38 0.00 45.38 AP 00380928 06/14/2017 WILSON, PRINCESS 142.60 0.00 142.60 AP 00380931 06/15/2017 BRODART BOOKS 7,133.66 0.00 7,133.66 AP 00380932 06/15/2017 FORD OF UPLAND INC 1,652.07 0.00 11652.07 AP 00380933 06/15/2017 KME FIRE APPARATUS 0.00 2,778.86 2,778.86 AP 00380934 06/15/2017 LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS LLC 5,291.57 0.00 5,291.57 AP 00380936 06/15/2017 OFFICE DEPOT 7,951.20 1,014.02 8,965.22 *** AP 00380937 06/15/2017 ORKIN PEST CONTROL 0.00 420.00 420.00 AP 00380938 06/15/2017 UPLAND AUTO TRIM 940.00 0.00 940.00 AP 00380939 06/15/2017 US POSTMASTER 0.00 1,818.56 1,818.56 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 6 Current Date: 07/11/2017 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 15:32:57 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P7 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 6/13/2017 through 7/10/2017 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name C Fire Amount All 00380940 06/21/2017 A & A AUTOMOTIVE AND TIRE INC. 903.97 0.00 903.97 AP 00380941 06/21/2017 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 4,716.37 0.00 4.716.37 AP 00380942 06/21/2017 ABLE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 15,989.00 0.00 15.989.00 AP 00380943 06/21/2017 ADDICTED TO YOGA 511.09 0.00 511.09 AI' 00380944 06/21/2017 ADVANCED CHEMICAL TRANSPORT 1,313.50 0.00 1,313.50 AP 00380945 06/21/2017 AFLAC GROUP INSURANCE 40.97 0.00 40.97 AP 00380946 06/21/2017 ALBERTA. WEBB 5,612.87 0.00 5,612.87 AP 00380947 06/21/2017 ALL WELDING 130.00 0.00 130.00 AP 00380948 06/21/2017 ALPHAGRAPHICS 17.11 0.00 17.11 AP 00380949 06/21/2017 ALTA RANCHO PET HOSPITAL 50.00 0.00 50.00 AP 00380950 06/21/2017 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 165.00 0.00 165.00 All 00380951 06/21/2017 ANTECH DIAGNOSTICS 1,421.00 0.00 1.421.00 AP 00380952 06/21/2017 ANYPROMO INC. 2,762.94 0.00 2,762.94 All 00380953 06/21/2017 ARC DOCUMENT SOLUTIONS LLC 77.54 0.00 77.54 AP 00380954 06/21/2017 ARROYO, ROSSY 1,000.00 0.00 1,000.00 AP 00380955 01/19/2017 BARTEL ASSOCIATES LLC 2,000.00 0.00 2,000.00 AP 00380956 06/21/2017 BATTERY POWER INC 561.74 0.00 561.74 AP 00380957 06/21/2017 BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS TRAINING INSTITUTE 481.00 0.00 481.00 AI' 00380958 06/21/2017 BERTINO AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE 1,092.22 0.00 1,092.22 AP 00380959 06/21/2017 BEST GOLF CARTS INC. 1,958.11 0.00 11958.11 AP 00380960 06/21/2017 BISHOP COMPANY 434.06 0.00 434.06 AP 00380961 06/21/2017 BSN SPORTS INC. 2,953.84 0.00 2,953.84 AP 00380962 06/21/2017 BUREAU VERITAS NORTH AMERICA INC 3,190.00 0.00 31190.00 AP 00380963 06/21/2017 BUTSKO UTILITY DESIGN INC. 7,324.84 0.00 7,324.84 AP 00380964 06/21/2017 C V W D 495.73 0.00 495.73 AP 00380965 06/21/2017 C V W D 536.05 0.00 536.05 AP 00380968 06/21/2017 C V W D 73,639.60 597.97 74.237.57 *** AP 00380969 06/21/2017 CABLE INC. 96.00 0.00 96.00 AP 00380970 06/21/2017 CACEO 75.00 0.00 75.00 AP 00380971 06/21/2017 CAL PERS LONG TERM CARE 286.21 0.00 286.21 AP 00380972 06/21/2017 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 60.00 0.00 60.00 AP 00380973 06/21/2017 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 100.00 0.00 100.00 AP 00380974 06/21/2017 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 8.44 0.00 8.44 AP 00380975 06/21/2017 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 426.27 0.00 426.27 AP 00380976 06/21/2017 CAPITAL ONE COMMERCIAL 0.00 580.06 580.06 AP 00380977 06/21/2017 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 682.81 0.00 682.81 AP 00380978 06/21/2017 CARRILLO, MICHAEL 103.76 0.00 103.76 AP 00380979 06/21/2017 CASTELLANOS, JASON 2,300.00 0.00 2,300.00 AP 00380980 06/21/2017 CELLEBRITE USA INC. 3,700.00 0.00 3,700.00 AP 00380981 06/21/2017 CHANCE, RYAN 1,000.00 0.00 1,000.00 AI' 00380982 06/21/2017 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 3,499.23 646.24 4,145.47 *** AP 00380983 06/21/2017 CHASING 7 DREAMS 190.00 0.00 190.00 AP 00380984 06/21/2017 CINTAS CORPORATION #150 1.908.63 372.00 2,280.63 *** AP 00380985 06/21/2017 CITY OF FOSTER CITY 2,000.00 0.00 2,000.00 AP 00380986 06/21/2017 CLEAR COAST CONSTRUCTION 265.20 0.00 265.20 AP 00380987 06/21/2017 COLLINS, RICK 43.58 0.00 43.58 AP 00380988 06/21/2017 CONVERGEONE INC. 63,141.43 0.00 63,141.43 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 7 Current Date: 07/11/2017 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait 1 Time: 15:32:57 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P8 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 6/13/2017 through 7/10/2017 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Citv Fire Amount AP 00380989 06/21/2017 CORBIN & ASSOCIATES 770.00 0.00 770.00 AP 00380990 06/21/2017 CORODATA MEDIA STORAGE INC 975.62 0.00 975.62 AP 00380991 06/21/2017 COST RECOVERY SYSTEMS INC 10.000.00 0.00 10.000.00 AP 00380992 06/21/2017 COWAN, CRYSTAL 250.00 0.00 250.00 AP 00380993 06/21/2017 CPR HERO TRAINING CENTER LLC, THE 204.21 0.00 204.21 AP 00380994 06/21/2017 CRAZATIC ENTERTAINMENT CORP 774.00 0.00 774.00 AP 00380995 06/21/2017 CREATIVE BRAIN LEARNING 1,980.00 0.00 1.980.00 Al' 00380996 06/21/2017 CRUZ-CONTRERAS, CAROLINE 516.52 0.00 516.52 AP 00380997 06/21/2017 D M CONTRACTING INC 115,811.88 0.00 115,81 1.88 All 00380998 06/21/2017 DANCE DYNAMICS 9,506.36 0.00 9,506.36 AP 00380999 06/21/2017 DATAMARS INC. 547.39 0.00 547.39 AP 00381000 06/21/2017 DEENER, KAYELANI 105.83 0.00 105.83 AP 00381001 06/21/2017 DESER, ABIGAIL 1,400.00 0.00 1.400.00 AP 00381002 06/21/2017 DINEEN, MARY 212.90 0.00 212.90 All 00381003 06/21/2017 DOMINGUEZ, DESTINIE 207.00 0.00 207.00 AP 00381004 06/21/2017 DUMBELL MAN FITNESS EQUIPMENT, THE 595.69 0.00 595.69 AP 00381005 06/21/2017 EDWARD PROFESSIONAL ADVISORS 525.00 0.00 525.00 AP 00381006 06/21/2017 EIGHTH AVENUE ENTERPRISE LLC 2,407.14 0.00 2,407.14 AP 00381007 06/21/2017 ENGINEERING INNOVATION 0.00 68.77 68.77 AP 00381008 06/21/2017 EXECUTIVE AUTO DETAIL 2,830.00 0.00 2,830.00 All 00381009 06/21/2017 EXPRESS BRAKE SUPPLY 910.54 0.00 910.54 AP 00381010 06/21/2017 FIRE ETC. 0.00 8,226.45 8,226.45 AP 00381011 06/21/2017 FRED PRYOR SEMINARS/CAREERTRACK 99.00 0.00 99.00 AP 00381013 06/21/2017 FRONTIER COMM 3,025.09 1,931.29 4,956.38 *** AP 00381014 06/21/2017 G AND M BUSINESS INTERIORS 0.00 51.17 51.17 AP 00381015 06/21/2017 GALE, BRIAN 833.00 0.00 833.00 All 00381016 06/21/2017 GATORWRAPS INC. 537.89 0.00 537.89 AP 00381017 06/21/2017 GEORGE HILLS COMPANY 1,855.70 0.00 1.855.70 AI' 00381018 06/21/2017 GOOD YEAR TIRE AND RUBBER CO. 1,009.69 0.00 1.009.69 A1' 00381019 06/21/2017 GRAINGER 2,135.52 0.00 2,135.52 AP 00381020 06/21/2017 GRIFFIN STRUCTURES INC 25,395.60 0.00 25,395.60 AP 00381021 06/21/2017 GRIFFIN, SHIRR'L 40.73 0.00 40.73 AP 00381022 06/21/2017 GROVE LUMBER 652.00 0.00 652.00 AP 00381023 06/21/2017 GUNTHER, DIANE 250.00 0.00 250.00 AP 00381024 06/21/2017 HAHN, NANCY 2,148.00 0.00 2,148.00 AP 00381025 06/21/2017 HAWTHORNE LIFT SYSTEMS 1,497.16 0.00 1.497.16 AP 00381026 06/21/2017 HEARTSAVERS LLC 130.00 0.00 130.00 AP 00381027 06/21/2017 HERITAGE EDUCATION GROUP 73.00 0.00 73.00 AP 00381028 06/21/2017 HMC ARCHITECTS 0.00 20,035.00 20,035.00 AP 00381029 06/21/2017 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 645 799.33 0.00 799.33 AP 00381030 06/21/2017 HOSE MAN INC 123.87 0.00 123.87 AP 00381031 06/21/2017 HOT SHOTS ATHLETIC APPAREL INC. 9,624.83 0.00 9,624.83 AP 00381032 06/21/2017 IATSE NATIONAL HEALTH & WELFARE FUNDS 1,200.00 0.00 1,200.00 AP 00381033 06/21/2017 IDEXX DISTRIBUTION INC 4,225.14 0.00 4,225.14 AP 00381034 06/21/2017 IECIAA 35.00 0.00 35.00 AP 00381035 06/21/2017 IMPRESSIONS GOURMET CATERING 377.13 0.00 377.13 AP 00381036 06/21/2017 INDERWIESCHE, MATT 792.00 0.00 792.00 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 8 Current Date: 07/11/2017 Report: CK -AGENDA -REG -PORTRAIT -CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 15:32:57 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P9 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 6/13/2017 through 7/10/2017 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Citv Fire Amount AP 00381037 06/21/2017 INLAND EMPIRE PROPERTY SERVICES INC 0.00 10,555.00 10,555.00 AP 00381038 06/21/2017 INLAND PRESORT & MAILING SERVICES 175.32 0.00 175.32 AP 00381039 06/21/2017 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 155.05 0.00 155.05 AP 00381040 06/21/2017 INLAND VALLEY EMERGENCY PET CLINIC 1,392.00 0.00 1,392.00 AP 00381041 06/21/2017 INTELESYS ONE INC 3,613.19 0.00 3.613.19 AP 00381042 06/21/2017 INTERVET INC 5,918.46 0.00 5,918.46 AP 00381043 06/21/2017 IRON MOUNTAIN OSDP 793.58 0.00 793.58 AP 00381044 06/21/2017 ISLAM, SAIMON 250.00 0.00 250.00 AP 00381045 06/21/2017 J & D GUILLIAM CONSTRUCTION INC 125.00 0.00 125.00 AP 00381046 06/21/2017 JOHN BURR CYCLES INC 257.68 0.00 257.68 AP 00381047 06/21/2017 JOHNNY ALLEN TENNIS ACADEMY 999.60 0.00 999.60 AP 00381048 06/21/2017 KEITH, JORRY 246.00 0.00 246.00 AP 00381049 06/21/2017 KOA CORPORATION 27,210.00 0.00 27,210.00 AP 00381050 06/21/2017 KOSS, TOM 1,839.00 0.00 1,839.00 AP 00381051 06/21/2017 KVAC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES INC 827.50 0.00 827.50 AP 00381052 06/21/2017 LAURA'S BOUTIQUE 165.00 0.00 165.00 AP 00381053 06/21/2017 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 40.00 0.00 40.00 All 00381054 06/21/2017 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 895.50 0.00 895.50 AP 00381055 06/21/2017 LINDSTROM, TROY 58.07 0.00 58.07 AP 00381056 06/21/2017 LINGER, MARION 50.84 0.00 50.84 All 00381057 06/21/2017 LINNELL, SHERRY 833.00 0.00 833.00 AP 00381058 06/21/2017 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 5,765.00 0.00 5.765.00 AP 00381059 06/21/2017 LOS ANGELES ENGINEERING INC 642.20 0.00 642.20 AP 00381060 06/21/2017 LOS ANGELES FREIGHTLINER 1.358.75 0.00 1,358.75 AP 00381061 06/21/2017 MARIPOSA LANDSCAPES INC 15,807.37 146.03 15,953.40 *** AP 00381062 06/21/2017 MARLINK SA INC 0.00 2,028.19 2,028.19 AP 00381063 06/21/2017 MC AVOY & MARKHAM 856.60 0.00 856.60 AP 00381064 06/21/2017 MEDELLIN, RAMON 1,200.00 0.00 1,200.00 AP 00381065 06/21/2017 MEDLEY FIRE PROTECTION INC 0.00 397.62 397.62 AP 00381066 06/21/2017 MERCADO, MATTHEW 312.25 0.00 312.25 A1' 00381067 06/21/2017 MIDWEST TAPE 1,136.69 0.00 1,136.69 AP 00381068 06/21/2017 MINUTEMAN PRESS 1,175.05 0.00 1,175.05 AP 00381069 06/21/2017 MIRACLE RECREATION EQUIPMENT COPANY 293.32 0.00 293.32 AP 00381070 06/21/2017 MOUNTAIN VIEW FAITH COMMUNITY CHUCH 422.18 0.00 422.18 AP 00381071 06/21/2017 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 441.63 0.00 441.63 AP 00381072 06/21/2017 NAPA AUTO PARTS 13.27 0.00 13.27 A1' 00381073 06/21/2017 NBS 9,750.00 0.00 9.750.00 AP 00381074 06/21/2017 NIGHTHAWK TOTAL CONTROL 133.75 0.00 133.75 AP 00381075 06/21/2017 NOVELTY PRINTING 0.00 1.033.07 1.033.07 AP 00381076 06/21/2017 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CTRS OF CA 720.29 0.00 720.29 AP 00381077 06/21/2017 ONTARIO WINNELSON CO 69.88 0.00 69.88 A1' 00381078 06/21/2017 ONTRAC 78.91 0.00 78.91 AP 00381079 06/21/2017 ONWARD ENGINEERING 18.325.12 352.63 18.677.75 *** AP 00381080 06/21/2017 PACIFIC PREMIER BANK 0.00 67,448.48 67,448.48 AP 00381081 06/21/2017 PARS 3,500.00 0.00 3,500.00 AP 00381082 06/21/2017 PARSAC 326,475.00 0.00 326,475.00 AP 00381083 06/21/2017 PARSAC 163,426.00 0.00 163.426.00 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 9 Current Date: 07/11/2017 Report: CK -AGENDA -PEG -PORTRAIT -CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 15:32:57 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P10 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AEenda Check Register 6/13/2017 through 7/10/2017 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00381084 06/21/2017 PATCHETT & ASSOCIATES 2,035.86 0.00 2.035.86 AP 00381085 06/21/2017 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 137.87 0.00 137.87 AP 00381086 06/21/2017 PETROVICH, VICTORIA 833.00 0.00 833.00 AP 00381087 06/21/2017 PH&S PRODUCTS LLC 0.00 4,360.00 4,360.00 AP 00381088 06/21/2017 PHAN,NAATHAN 1,123.00 0.00 1,123.00 AP 00381089 06/21/2017 PORAC 236.50 0.00 236.50 AP 00381090 06/21/2017 PRE -PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 96.59 0.00 96.59 AP 00381091 06/21/2017 PRIME GLASS 252.40 0.00 252.40 AP 00381092 06/21/2017 PROMOTIONS TEES & MORE 11,985.97 0.00 11,985.97 AP 00381093 06/21/2017 PSA PRINT GROUP 232.74 0.00 232.74 AP 00381094 06/21/2017 RAMSEY, DINA PIAZZA- 62.24 0.00 62.24 AP 00381095 06/21/2017 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 245.67 0.00 245.67 AP 00381096 06/21/2017 RC COMMUNITY & ARTS FOUNDATION 4,142.00 0.00 4,142.00 AP 00381097 06/21/2017 RC CONSTRUCTION SERVICES INC 0.00 1,281,521.14 1,281,521.14 AP 00381098 06/21/2017 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 85.50 0.00 85.50 All 00381099 06/21/2017 RJM DESIGN GROUP INC 1,200.00 0.00 1,200.00 AP 00381100 06/21/2017 ROADRUNNER PHARMACY 461.56 0.00 461.56 AP 00381101 06/21/2017 ROBINSON, NICK 750.00 0.00 750.00 AP 00381102 06/21/2017 ROBLEDO, DONNA 45.66 0.00 45.66 AP 00381103 06/21/2017 ROTO ROOTER 4,070.00 0.00 4,070.00 AP 00381104 06/21/2017 ROYAL WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 5,886.87 336.17 6,223.04 *** AP 00381105 06/21/2017 SAFE -ENTRY TECHNICAL INC 0.00 525.00 525.00 AP 00381106 06/21/2017 SAFETY KLEEN SYSTEMS INC 0.00 210.11 210.11 AP 00381107 06/21/2017 SAMS CLUB/SYNCHRONY BANK 169.40 0.00 169.40 AP 00381108 06/21/2017 SAMUEL FRENCH INC 1,050.00 0.00 1,050.00 AP 00381109 06/21/2017 SAN BERNARDINO CTY SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOO 1,801.00 0.00 1,801.00 AP 00381110 06/21/2017 SARGENT TOWN PLANNING INC 102,760.89 0.00 102,760.89 AP 00381111 06/21/2017 SBC TREASURER TAX COLLECTOR 300.00 0.00 300.00 AP 00381112 06/21/2017 SBPEA 966.09 0.00 966.09 AP 00381113 06/21/2017 SC FUELS 0.00 10,260.27 10,260.27 AP 00381114 06/21/2017 SC FUELS 0.00 1,790.02 1.790.02 AP 00381115 06/21/2017 SCOTT SAFETY 0.00 577.22 577.22 AP 00381116 06/21/2017 SCOTT'S PPE RECON INC 0.00 453.55 453.55 AP 00381117 06/21/2017 SERRATO & ASSOCIATES 245.00 0.00 245.00 AP 00381118 06/21/2017 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 446.95 0.00 446.95 AP 00381119 06/21/2017 SHRED IT USA LLC 334.00 0.00 334.00 AP 00381120 06/21/2017 SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC 1,622.35 0.00 1,622.35 AP 00381121 06/21/2017 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 577.85 0.00 577.85 AP 00381122 06/21/2017 SOFTWARE ONE 251,574.92 37,513.00 2891087.92 *** AP 00381123 06/21/2017 SOUTH COAST AQMD 450.00 0.00 450.00 AP 00381126 06/21/2017 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 65,510.47 0.00 65,510.47 AP 00381127 06/21/2017 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.28 0.00 19.28 AP 00381128 06/21/2017 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 465.11 0.00 465.11 AP 00381129 06/21/2017 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 628.10 0.00 628.10 AP 00381130 06/21/2017 SUNGARD PUBLIC SECTOR INC 875.00 0.00 875.00 AP 00381131 06/21/2017 SYN -TECH SYSTEMS 27,553.93 7,458.84 35,012.77 *** AP 00381132 06/21/2017 SYSCO LOS ANGELES INC 652.99 0.00 652.99 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 10 Current Date: 07/11/2017 Report: CK -AGENDA -PEG -PORTRAIT -CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 15:32:57 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P11 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Redster 6/13/2017 through 7/10/2017 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Cite Fire Amount AP 00381 133 06/21/2017 TIFFHUGH INVESTMENT LLC 0.00 50.00 50.00 AP 00381134 06/21/2017 TINT CITY WINDOW TINTING 90.00 0.00 90.00 AP 00381135 06/21/2017 TRAFFIC PARTS 890.67 0.00 890.67 AP 00381136 06/21/2017 ULINE 139.71 0.00 139.71 AP 00381137 06/21/2017 UNIQUE MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC 398.09 0.00 398.09 AP 00381138 06/21/2017 UNITED PACIFIC SERVICES INC 8,076.00 0.00 8,076.00 AP 00381139 06/21/2017 UNITED SCENIC ARTISTS PENSION AND WELFARE FU 800.00 0.00 800.00 AP 00381140 06/21/2017 UNITED WAY 131.00 0.00 131.00 AP 00381141 06/21/2017 UPS 170.47 0.00 170.47 AP 00381142 06/21/2017 US POSTMASTER 20,000.00 0.00 20.000.00 AP 00381143 06/21/2017 UTILIQUEST 1,132.07 0.00 1,132.07 AP 00381144 06/21/2017 VALVERDE SCHOOL OF PERFORMING ARTS 20,000.00 0.00 20,000.00 AP 00381145 06/21/2017 VAN SCOYOC ASSOCIATES INC 4,000.00 0.00 4,000.00 AP 00381 146 06/21/2017 VEND U COMPANY 762.74 0.00 762.74 AP 00381147 06/21/2017 VENTURA TREE MANAGEMENT 100.00 0.00 100.00 AP 00381148 06/21/2017 VERIZON 23.15 0.00 23.15 AP 00381149 06/21/2017 VICTOR MEDICAL COMPANY 9,830.76 0.00 9,830.76 AP 00381150 06/21/2017 VINCENT, DIANA 46.69 0.00 46.69 AP 00381151 06/21/2017 VIRTUAL PROJECT MANAGER INC 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00381152 06/21/2017 VISION SERVICE PLAN CA 11,048.86 0.00 11,048.86 AP 00381153 06/21/2017 VORTEX INDUSTRIES INC 0.00 2,294.38 2,294.38 AP 00381154 06/21/2017 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 2,411.36 492.71 2,904.07 *** AP 00381155 06/21/2017 WELLS, ERIC 0.00 70.00 70.00 AP 00381156 06/21/2017 WILCOX SALES CO 541.58 0.00 541.58 AP 00381157 06/21/2017 WOHLERT, MATTHEW 249.64 0.00 249.64 AP 00381158 06/21/2017 WORLD ELITE GYMNASTICS 112.00 0.00 112.00 AP 00381159 06/21/2017 ZALEWSKI, JOHN 833.00 0.00 833.00 AP 00381160 06/21/2017 ZOETIS US LLC 668.51 0.00 668.51 AP 00381161 06/22/2017 ABC LOCKSMITHS 1,173.53 239.42 1,412.95 *** AP 00381162 06/22/2017 AGILINE LLC 1,480.00 0.00 1,480.00 AP 00381163 06/22/2017 AIRGAS USA LLC 79.61 278.25 357.86 *** AP 00381164 06/22/2017 BIBLIOTHECA LLC 87,705.05 0.00 87,705.05 AP 00381166 06/22/2017 BRODART BOOKS 1,321.26 0.00 1,321.26 AP 00381167 06/22/2017 CALSENSE 1,575.81 0.00 1,575.81 AP 00381168 06/22/2017 CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO INC 5,297.17 0.00 5,297.17 AP 00381169 06/22/2017 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 317.18 0.00 317.18 AP 00381170 06/22/2017 EMCOR SERVICE 17,699.00 0.00 17,699.00 AP 00381171 06/22/2017 FASTENAL COMPANY 1,058.75 0.00 1,058.75 AP 00381 172 06/22/2017 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 86.34 0.00 86.34 AP 00381173 06/22/2017 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 470.00 0.00 470.00 AP 00381174 06/22/2017 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 22,937.82 0.00 22,937.82 AP 00381175 06/22/2017 LANDCARE USA LLC 3,120.00 0.00 3,120.00 AP 00381176 06/22/2017 LN CURTIS AND SONS 0.00 1,815.59 1,815.59 AP 00381177 06/22/2017 OFFICE DEPOT 2,385.47 0.00 2,385.47 AP 00381178 06/22/2017 ORKIN PEST CONTROL 108.00 67.00 175.00 *** AP 00381179 06/22/2017 OVERDRIVE INC 2,560.20 0.00 22560.20 AP 00381180 06/22/2017 SUNRISE FORD 430.94 0.00 430.94 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: I 1 Current Date: 07/11/2017 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 15:32:57 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P12 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 6/13/2017 through 7/10/2017 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Citv Fire Amount AP 00381181 06/22/2017 VISTA PAINT 4,401.29 0.00 4,401.29 All 00381182 06/22/2017 CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE OF 3,103.95 711.40 3,815.35 *** AP 00381183 06/27/2017 CURATALO, JAMES 0.00 1,733.29 1,733.29 AP 00381184 06/27/2017 KIRKPATRICK, WILLIAM 0.00 4,888.65 4,888.65 AP 00381185 06/27/2017 LONCAR, PHILIP 0.00 1,019.78 1,019.78 AP 00381186 06/27/2017 TOWNSEND, JAMES 0.00 1,733.29 1,733.29 AP 00381187 06/27/2017 WALKER, KENNETH 0.00 261.76 261.76 AP 00381188 06/28/2017 CAMPOS, ENMA P. 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00381189 06/28/2017 A & A AUTOMOTIVE AND TIRE INC. 530.81 0.00 530.81 AP 00381190 06/28/2017 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 98.82 0.00 98.82 AP 00381191 06/28/2017 ABLE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1,474.69 0.00 1.474.69 AP 00381 192 06/28/2017 AIR & HOSE SOURCE INC. 48.06 0.00 48.06 AP 00381 193 06/28/2017 ALCORN, RICHARD 10.00 0.00 10.00 AP 00381194 06/28/2017 ALLIANCE BUS LINES INC 1,338.34 0.00 1,338.34 AP 00381195 06/28/2017 ALLIED UNIVERSAL SECURITY SERVICES 5,418.24 0.00 5,418.24 A13 00381196 06/28/2017 ALPHAGRAPHICS 34.02 0.00 34.02 A13 00381197 06/28/2017 ALTA VISTA MOBILE HOME PARK 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00381198 06/28/2017 ALTEC INDUSTRIES INC 5,586.82 0.00 5,586.82 AP 00381199 06/28/2017 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 16,470.00 0.00 16,470.00 AP 00381200 06/28/2017 ANDY GUMP 422.80 0.00 422.80 AP 00381201 06/28/2017 ANYPROMO INC. 1,472.93 0.00 1,472.93 AP 00381202 06/28/2017 AQUABIO ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES INC. 1,745.00 0.00 1,745.00 AP 00381203 06/28/2017 AROCHO, ALMA 1,428.00 0.00 1,428.00 AP 00381204 06/28/2017 ASSI SECURITY 1,465.00 0.00 1.465.00 AP 00381205 06/28/2017 AT&T 470.71 0.00 470.71 AP 00381206 06/28/2017 AUTO AND RV SPECIALISTS INC. 169.60 0.00 169.60 AP 00381207 06/28/2017 BARNES AND NOBLE 2,996.37 0.00 2,996.37 AP 00381208 06/28/2017 BARNES, CHRISTOPHER 1,000.00 0.00 1,000.00 AP 00381209 06/28/2017 BAUER COMPRESSORS 0.00 2,445.50 2.445.50 AP 00381210 06/28/2017 BAYER HEALTHCARE LLC 62.30 0.00 62.30 AP 00381211 06/28/2017 BELTRAN, MALLORY 3.96 0.00 3.96 AP 00381212 06/28/2017 BENNETT, JAN 22.83 0.00 22.83 A1' 00381213 06/28/2017 BERLITZ 110.00 0.00 110.00 AP 00381214 06/28/2017 BERN MARIES PROMOTIONAL PRODUCTS 1,028.15 0.00 1,028.15 AP 00381215 06/28/2017 BLUM ELECTRIC 1,772.30 0.00 1,772.30 AP 00381216 06/28/2017 BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERVICES INC. 114,191.22 0.00 114,191.22 AP 00381217 06/28/2017 BROWN, JILL 245.43 0.00 245.43 AP 00381218 06/28/2017 BUIS, DIANA 28.01 0.00 28.01 AP 00381220 06/28/2017 C V W D 63,761.12 0.00 63,761.12 AP 00381221 06/28/2017 CA LLC - DBA ALTA LAGUNA MHP 600.00 0.00 600.00 AP 00381222 06/28/2017 CACEO 150.00 0.00 150.00 AP 00381223 06/28/2017 CAL PERS 137,259.99 7,285.35 144,545.34 *** AP 00381224 06/28/2017 CAL STATE SITE SERVICES 3,763.50 0.00 3,763.50 AP 00381225 06/28/2017 CALIFORNIA BANK & TRUST 36,661.07 0.00 36,661.07 AP 00381226 06/28/2017 CALIFORNIA SHOPPING CART RETRIEVAL CORP 35.00 0.00 35.00 A1' 00381227 06/28/2017 CAMP FIRE ISCC 5.000.00 0.00 5.000.00 AP 00381228 06/28/2017 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 1,172.40 2.61 1,175.01 *** User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 12 Current Date: 07/11/2017 Report: CK -AGENDA -PEG -PORTRAIT -CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 15:32:57 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P13 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 6/13/2017 through 7/10/2017 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Lqy Fire Amount AP 00381229 06/28/2017 CARSWELL, ZACHARY 2,000.00 0.00 2,000.00 AP 00381230 06/28/2017 CARTY, DIANE 570.00 0.00 570.00 AP 00381231 06/28/2017 CASA VOLANTE MOBILE HOME PARK 900.00 0.00 900.00 AP 00381232 06/28/2017 CCAC 200.00 0.00 200.00 AP 00381233 06/28/2017 CHAPARRAL HEIGHTS MOBILE HOME PARK 700.00 0.00 700.00 AP 00381234 06/28/2017 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES INC. 4,070.00 0.00 4,070.00 AP 00381235 06/28/2017 CHINO MOWER AND ENGINE SERVICE 365.91 0.00 365.91 AP 00381236 06/28/2017 CHU, MICHAEL 132.00 0.00 132.00 AP 00381237 06/28/2017 CHUNG, MICHAEL 5.19 0.00 5.19 AP 00381238 06/28/2017 CHURCH OF CHRIST 250.00 0.00 250.00 AP 00381239 06/28/2017 CINTAS CORPORATION #150 5,766.99 407.44 6.174.43 *** AP 00381240 06/28/2017 CLARK, KAREN 945.00 0.00 945.00 AP 00381241 06/28/2017 CLEANRIVER RECYCLING SOLUTIONS 3,495.00 0.00 3,495.00 AP 00381242 06/28/2017 CLIENT FIRST CONSULTING GROUP 6,725.00 0.00 6,725.00 AP 00381243 06/28/2017 CLIMATEC LLC 1,187.23 0.00 1,187.23 AP 00381244 06/28/2017 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTR INC 190.72 0.00 190.72 AP 00381245 06/28/2017 CORODATA MEDIA STORAGE INC 1,229.36 0.00 1.229.36 AP 00381246 06/28/2017 COUNTRY ESTATE FENCE CO INC 2,618.17 0.00 2,618.17 AP 00381247 06/28/2017 CREATIVE BRAIN LEARNING 792.00 0.00 792.00 AP 00381248 06/28/2017 CROP PRODUCTION SERVICES INC 1,050.70 0.00 1,050.70 AP 00381249 06/28/2017 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 4,173.00 0.00 4.173.00 AP 00381250 06/28/2017 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 893.25 0.00 893.25 AP 00381251 06/28/2017 DAISY 720.26 0.00 720.26 AI' 00381252 06/28/2017 DEAIBES, DANIEL 10.74 0.00 10.74 AP 00381253 06/28/2017 DELGADO, CHRISTINE 15.00 0.00 15.00 AP 00381254 06/28/2017 DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES 73.00 0.00 73.00 AP 00381255 06/28/2017 DESIGN MASONRY 608.35 0.00 608.35 AP 00381256 06/28/2017 DOWNEY, JENNIFER 29.18 0.00 29.18 AP 00381257 06/28/2017 DREAM SHAPERS 475.00 0.00 475.00 AP 00381258 06/28/2017 DUGMORE & DUNCAN INC. 0.00 1,365.04 11365.04 AP 00381259 06/28/2017 DUMBELL MAN FITNESS EQUIPMENT, THE 1,040.08 0.00 1,040.08 AP 00381260 06/28/2017 DUNN, ANN MARIE 576.00 0.00 576.00 AP 00381261 06/28/2017 DURKEL, CAROL 147.24 0.00 147.24 AP 00381262 06/28/2017 E POLY STAR INC. 1,724.00 0.00 1,724.00 AP 00381263 06/28/2017 EASTERLING, RAY 393.60 0.00 393.60 AP 00381264 06/28/2017 ENTERSECT CORP 79.00 0.00 79.00 AP 00381265 06/28/2017 EXECUTIVE AUTO DETAIL 480.00 0.00 480.00 AP 00381266 06/28/2017 EXPRESS BRAKE SUPPLY 41.41 0.00 41.41 AP 00381267 06/28/2017 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS 0.00 1,004.97 11004.97 AP 00381268 06/28/2017 FELICIANO, GASPAR ANTHONY 480.00 0.00 480.00 AP 00381269 06/28/2017 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC #1350 267.30 0.00 267.30 AP 00381270 06/28/2017 FLAG SYSTEMS INC. 1,750.00 0.00 1,750.00 AP 00381271 06/28/2017 FLIP GYMNASTICS 250.00 0.00 250.00 AP 00381272 06/28/2017 FOOTHILL FAMILY SHELTER 2,500.00 0.00 2,500.00 AP 00381273 06/28/2017 FOOTHILL MOBILE MANOR 300.00 0.00 300.00 AP 00381274 06/28/2017 FRED PRYOR SEMINARS/CAREERTRACK 178.00 0.00 178.00 AP 00381275 06/28/2017 FRONTIER FORD 0.00 154,208.20 154,208.20 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 13 Current Date: 07/11/2017 Report: CK -AGENDA -PEG -PORTRAIT -CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 15:32:57 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P14 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 6/13/2017 through 7/10/2017 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00381276 06/28/2017 GATORWRAPS INC. 612.89 0.00 612.89 AP 00381277 06/28/2017 GILLISON, JOHN 400.00 0.00 400.00 AP 00381278 06/28/2017 GIORDANO, MARIANNA 115.20 0.00 115.20 AP 00381279 06/28/2017 GOLDEN STATE RISK MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY 100,273.00 1,306.00 101,579.00 *** AP 00381280 06/28/2017 GOOD YEAR TIRE AND RUBBER CO. 5.939.13 0.00 5.939.13 AP 00381281 06/28/2017 GRAINGER 2,251.63 46.78 2,298.41 *** AP 00381282 06/28/2017 HAMILTON, MONIQUE 960.00 0.00 960.00 AP 00381283 06/28/2017 HARDY & HARPER INC 8,594.43 0.00 8.594.43 AP 00381284 06/28/2017 HCI SYSTEMS INC. 118.38 0.00 118.38 AP 00381285 06/28/2017 HENRY SCHEIN ANIMAL HEALTH SUPPLY 539.17 0.00 539.17 AP 00381286 06/28/2017 HI WAY SAFETY INC 1,172.54 0.00 1,172.54 AP 00381287 06/28/2017 HOLDER, DIANE 100.00 0.00 100.00 AP 00381288 06/28/2017 HOMETOWN AMERICA RAMONA VILLA 900.00 0.00 900.00 AP 00381289 06/28/2017 HORIZON SOLAR POWER 115.77 0.00 115.77 All 00381290 06/28/2017 HORIZONS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY INTERNATION 0.00 231,626.07 231,626.07 AP 00381291 06/28/2017 HOSE MAN INC 325.10 49.74 374.84 *** AP 00381292 06/28/2017 HOUR GLASS & MIRROR INC. 591.04 0.00 591.04 AP 00381293 06/28/2017 HUNTINGTON HARDWARE 566.18 0.00 566.18 AP 00381294 06/28/2017 INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO INC 0.00 437.28 437.28 AP 00381295 06/28/2017 INLAND FAIR HOUSING AND MEDIATION BOARD 1,379.51 0.00 1,379.51 AP 00381296 06/28/2017 INTERACTIVE DATA PRICING AND REFERENCE DATA 126.87 0.00 126.87 AP 00381297 06/28/2017 JOHNNY ALLEN TENNIS ACADEMY 3,243.00 0.00 3,243.00 AP 00381298 06/28/2017 JRC HOUSING 8,275.00 0.00 8,275.00 AP 00381299 06/28/2017 JRC HOUSING 4,995.00 0.00 4,995.00 AP 00381300 06/28/2017 JRC HOUSING 6,085.00 0.00 6,085.00 AP 00381301 06/28/2017 JTB SUPPLY COMPANY 4,697.90 0.00 4,697.90 AP 00381302 06/28/2017 KIMBALL MIDWEST 237.59 0.00 237.59 AP 00381303 06/28/2017 LATREACE, RAINEY 476.00 0.00 476.00 AP 00381304 06/28/2017 LEITNER, STACEY 450.00 0.00 450.00 AP 00381305 06/28/2017 LIFE ASSIST INC 0.00 135.40 135.40 AP 00381306 06/28/2017 LIM, JU YOUNG 2,000.00 0.00 2,000.00 AP 00381307 06/28/2017 LINGER, MARION 129.69 0.00 129.69 AP 00381308 06/28/2017 LOCKWOOD, NATALIE 100.00 0.00 100.00 AP 00381309 06/28/2017 LOS ANGELES TIMES 749.49 0.00 749.49 AP 00381310 06/28/2017 MADOLE AND ASSOCIATES INC 6,320.00 0.00 6.320.00 AP 00381311 06/28/2017 MARIPOSA LANDSCAPES INC 35,066.45 2,052.85 37.119.30 *** AP 00381312 06/28/2017 MARK CHRISTOPHER INC 0.00 78.64 78.64 AP 00381313 06/28/2017 MARRUFO, JOANNA 152.15 0.00 152.15 AP 00381314 06/28/2017 MAXWELL, MICHELLE 18.00 0.00 18.00 AP 00381315 06/28/2017 MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 198.97 480.10 679.07 *** AP 00381316 06/28/2017 MCWILLIAMS, HANNELORE 28.04 0.00 28.04 AP 00381317 06/28/2017 MEDLEY FIRE PROTECTION INC 5,346.49 0.00 5,346.49 AP 00381318 06/28/2017 MERRIWEATHER, SEQUOIA 45.66 0.00 45.66 AP 00381319 06/28/2017 MIDWEST TAPE 1,413.34 0.00 1,413.34 AP 00381320 06/28/2017 MMASC 0.00 85.00 85.00 AP 00381321 06/28/2017 MORGAN, ASHLEY 246.40 0.00 246.40 AP 00381322 06/28/2017 MOUNTAIN VIEW FAITH COMMUNITY CHUCH 25.94 0.00 25.94 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 14 Current Date: 07/11/2017 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 15:32:57 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P15 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 6/13/2017 through 7/10/2017 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Citv Fire Amount AP 00381323 06/28/2017 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 219.00 0.00 219.00 AP 00381324 06/28/2017 NAPA AUTO PARTS 16.17 151.26 167.43 *** AP 00381325 06/28/2017 NATIONAL FIRE FIGHTER WILDLAND 0.00 669.20 669.20 AP 00381326 06/28/2017 NEW IMAGE INTERIOR FLOORING 0.00 2,754.48 2,754.48 AP 00381327 06/28/2017 NIXON EGLI EQUIPMENT CO 2,935.15 0.00 2,935.15 AP 00381328 06/28/2017 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CTRS OF CA 2,381.79 0.00 2,381.79 AP 00381329 06/28/2017 ONTARIO WINNELSON CO 0.00 390.32 390.32 AP 00381330 06/28/2017 ORONA, PATRICIA 660.00 0.00 660.00 AP 00381331 06/28/2017 OTT, LAURA 732.00 0.00 732.00 AP 00381332 06/28/2017 OTT, SHARON 612.00 0.00 612.00 AP 00381333 06/28/2017 PAPAZOGLU, NORAY 1,051.20 0.00 1,051.20 AP 00381334 06/28/2017 PARMER, MICHAEL 231.10 0.00 231.10 AP 00381335 06/28/2017 PEPSI -COLA 741.41 0.00 741.41 AP 00381336 06/28/2017 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 741.35 0.00 741.35 AP 00381337 06/28/2017 PHOENIX GROUP INFORMATION SYSTEMS 40.94 0.00 40.94 AI' 00381338 06/28/2017 PINES MOBILE HOME PARK, THE 400.00 0.00 400.00 AI' 00381339 06/28/2017 PIONEER MANUFACTURING 123.39 0.00 123.39 AP 00381340 06/28/2017 PLUMP ENGINEERING 997.38 0.00 997.38 AP 00381341 06/28/2017 PORAC LEGAL DEFENSE FUND 274.50 0.00 274.50 AP 00381342 06/28/2017 RANCHO CUCAMONGA QUAKES 155.00 0.00 155.00 AP 00381343 06/28/2017 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 20.20 0.00 20.20 AP 00381344 06/28/2017 RC COMMUNITY & ARTS FOUNDATION 6,750.00 0.00 6,750.00 AP 00381345 06/28/2017 RD SERVICES 277.00 0.00 277.00 AP 00381346 06/28/2017 RDO EQUIPMENT COMPANY 1,131.15 0.00 1,131.15 AI' 00381347 06/28/2017 RESOURCE BUILDING MATERIALS 946.23 0.00 946.23 AP 00381348 06/28/2017 RIGLEMAN, ENCARNACION ONTIVEROS 120.00 0.00 120.00 AP 00381349 06/28/2017 RILES, DAVID 129.69 0.00 129.69 AP 00381350 06/28/2017 ROTO ROOTER 461.89 0.00 461.89 AP 00381351 06/28/2017 ROYAL WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 2,647.29 0.00 2,647.29 AP 00381352 06/28/2017 S.CALIF MUNICIPAL ATHLETIC FEDERATION 310.00 0.00 310.00 AP 00381353 06/28/2017 SAFARILAND LLC 0.00 420.23 420.23 AP 00381354 06/28/2017 SAFE -ENTRY TECHNICAL INC 0.00 4.690.95 4,690.95 AP 00381355 06/28/2017 SALAZAR, ANGELICA 105.17 0.00 105.17 AP 00381356 06/28/2017 SAMPLES, RYAN 103.44 0.00 103.44 AI' 00381357 06/28/2017 SAN BERNARDINO CTY 0.00 11.890.52 11.890.52 AP 00381358 06/28/2017 SC FUELS 0.00 635.29 635.29 AP 00381359 06/28/2017 SENECHAL, CALVIN 470.40 0.00 470.40 AP 00381360 06/28/2017 SHEAKLEY PENSION ADMINISTRATION 0.00 155.95 155.95 AP 00381361 06/28/2017 SHEAKLEY PENSION ADMINISTRATION 329.45 0.00 329.45 Al' 00381362 06/28/2017 SHRED PROS 0.00 35.00 35.00 AP 00381363 06/28/2017 SIR SPEEDY 1,154.15 0.00 1,154.15 AP 00381364 06/28/2017 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 6,004.94 0.00 6,004.94 AP 00381365 06/28/2017 SNAP ON TOOLS 529.06 0.00 529.06 AP 00381366 06/28/2017 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 187.19 348.54 535.73 *** AP 00381367 06/28/2017 SOLAR CITY CORPORATION 123.40 0.00 123.40 AP 00381368 06/28/2017 SOLIMAN, KAREN 250.00 0.00 250.00 AP 00381375 06/28/2017 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 20,654.43 1,973.34 22,627.77 *** User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 15 Current Date: 07/11/2017 Report: CK -AGENDA -PEG -PORTRAIT -CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 15:32:57 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P16 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 6/13/2017 through 7/10. 2017 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Citv Fire Amount AP 00381376 06/28/2017 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA NEWS GROUP 1,700.00 0.00 1.700.00 AP 00381377 06/28/2017 SOUTHLAND SPORTS OFFICIALS 184.00 0.00 184.00 AP 00381378 06/28/2017 STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY 4,088.72 0.00 4,088.72 AP 00381379 06/28/2017 STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY 13,237.45 0.00 13.237.45 AP 00381380 06/28/2017 STORBM SELF STORAGE 895.00 0.00 895.00 AP 00381381 06/28/2017 STOTZ EQUIPMENT 1,024.93 0.00 1,024.93 AP 00381382 06/28/2017 SUNRUN INSTALLATION SERVICES INC 61.70 0.00 61.70 AP 00381383 06/28/2017 SWARTZ, ALAN 81.00 0.00 81.00 AP 00381384 06/28/2017 SYCAMORE VILLA MOBILE HOME PARK 400.00 0.00 400.00 AP 00381385 06/28/2017 SYN -TECH SYSTEMS 1,790.00 0.00 1.790.00 AP 00381386 06/28/2017 THOMSON REUTERS WEST PUBLISHING CORP 331.00 0.00 331.00 AP 00381387 06/28/2017 TORO TOWING 150.00 0.00 150.00 AP 00381388 06/28/2017 TOVEY/SHULTZ CONSTRUCTION INC 237,823.26 0.00 237,823.26 AP 00381389 06/28/2017 TYUS, IDA 189.00 0.00 189.00 AP 00381390 06/28/2017 U.S. BANK PARS ACCT #6746022500 573.92 0.00 573.92 AP 00381391 06/28/2017 U.S. BANK PARS ACCT 46746022500 6,605.00 0.00 6,605.00 AP 00381392 06/28/2017 U.S. BANK PARS ACCT 46746022500 2,666.70 0.00 2,666.70 AP 00381393 06/28/2017 ULINE 1,902.00 0.00 1,902.00 AP 00381394 06/28/2017 UNDERGROUND SVC ALERT OF SO CAL 256.50 0.00 256.50 AP 00381395 06/28/2017 UNITED PACIFIC SERVICES INC 2,768.00 0.00 2,768.00 AP 00381396 06/28/2017 UNITED SITE SERVICES OF CA INC 273.30 0.00 273.30 AP 00381397 06/28/2017 UPS 10.51 0.00 10.51 AP 00381398 06/28/2017 UTILIQUEST 1,705.27 0.00 1,705.27 AP 00381399 06/28/2017 VALLEY POWER SYSTEMS INC 783.71 54.33 838.04 *** AP 00381400 06/28/2017 VERIZON BUSINESS 80.56 0.00 80.56 AP 00381401 06/28/2017 VICTOR MEDICAL COMPANY 217.03 0.00 217.03 AP 00381402 06/28/2017 VIVERAE INC 10.95 0.00 10.95 AP 00381403 06/28/2017 VORTEX INDUSTRIES INC 758.00 0.00 758.00 AP 00381404 06/28/2017 WALKER, ROBERT 0.00 270.00 270.00 AP 00381405 06/28/2017 WALKER, VONTA 500.00 0.00 500.00 AI' 00381406 06/28/2017 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 4,514.74 0.00 4.514.74 AP 00381407 06/28/2017 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 8,578.13 0.00 8,578.13 AP 00381408 06/28/2017 WESTRUX INTERNATIONAL INC 234.56 0.00 234.56 AP 00381409 06/28/2017 WHITE HOUSE PHOTO INC 1,050.00 0.00 1,050.00 AP 00381410 06/28/2017 WHITTIER FERTILIZER 2,909.25 0.00 2,909.25 AP 00381411 06/28/2017 WONDRIES FLEET GROUP 125,656.16 0.00 125.656.16 AP 00381412 06/28/2017 WORLD ELITE GYMNASTICS 196.00 0.00 196.00 AP 00381415 06/28/2017 XEROX CORPORATION 10,177.37 450.45 10.627.82 *** AP 00381416 06/28/2017 ZOETIS US LLC 328.85 0.00 328.85 AP 00381417 06/28/2017 ZONES CORPORATE SOLUTIONS 3,566.62 0.00 3,566.62 AP 00381418 06/29/2017 CAL PERS 137,259.99 8,285.35 145,545.34 *** AP 00381419 06/29/2017 ABC LOCKSMITHS 274.02 1,792.13 2,066.15 *** AP 00381420 06/29/2017 BIBLIOTHECA LLC 1,751.75 0.00 1,751.75 AP 00381426 06/29/2017 BRODART BOOKS 23,005.36 0.00 237005.36 AP 00381427 06/29/2017 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 0.00 192.27 192.27 AP 00381428 06/29/2017 EMCOR SERVICE 660.00 0.00 660.00 AP 00381429 06/29/2017 ESI ACQUISITIONS INC 0.00 37305.00 3,305.00 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 16 Current Date: 07/11/2017 Report: CK -AGENDA -REG -PORTRAIT -CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 15:32:57 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P17 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 6/13/2017 through 7/10/2017 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Citv Fire Amount AP 00381430 06/29/2017 FORD OF UPLAND INC 3,848.86 0.00 3.848.86 AP 00381431 06/29/2017 GENERATOR SERVICES CO 4,012.48 0.00 4.012.48 AP 00381432 06/29/2017 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 2,681.38 0.00 2,681.38 AP 00381433 06/29/2017 KME FIRE APPARATUS 0.00 11,557.09 11.557.09 AP 00381434 06/29/2017 LIMS AUTO INC 378.15 0.00 378.15 AP 00381436 06/29/2017 OFFICE DEPOT 4,146.03 258.74 4,404.77 *** AP 00381437 06/29/2017 ORKIN PEST CONTROL 363.84 0.00 363.84 All 00381438 06/29/2017 SIMPLOT PARTNERS 2,056.95 0.00 2.056.95 A1' 00381439 06/29/2017 SPINITAR 1,737.31 0.00 1,737.31 AP 00381440 06/29/2017 SUNRISE FORD 295.47 0.00 295.47 AP 00381441 06/29/2017 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS 1,788.27 0.00 1,788.27 AP 00381442 06/29/2017 VISTA PAINT 962.65 0.00 962.65 A13 00381443 07/05/2017 Carnaval, Hector G 51.00 0.00 51.00 AP 00381444 07/05/2017 A & A AUTOMOTIVE AND TIRE INC. 394.24 0.00 394.24 AP 00381445 07/05/2017 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 2,333.45 0.00 2,333.45 AI' 00381446 07/05/2017 ACTION AWARDS INC. 1,087.56 0.00 1,087.56 AP 00381447 07/05/2017 ALBERT GROVER & ASSOCIATES 4,000.00 0.00 4,000.00 AP 00381448 07/05/2017 ALLIANCE BUS LINES INC 1,372.93 0.00 1372.93 AP 00381449 07/05/2017 ARMSTRONG GARDEN CENTERS INC. 119.52 0.00 119.52 AI' 00381450 07/05/2017 ARROW TRAILER SUPPLIES INC 36.53 0.00 36.53 AP 00381451 07/05/2017 ART OF LIVING FOUNDATION 54.00 0.00 54.00 AP 00381452 07/05/2017 BRAUN BLAISING SMITH WYNNE P.C. 5,080.25 0.00 5.080.25 All 00381453 07/05/2017 BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERVICES INC. 1,064.65 0.00 1,064.65 AP 00381454 07/05/2017 BUREAU VERITAS NORTH AMERICA INC 9,049.77 0.00 9.049.77 AP 00381455 07/05/2017 BUTSKO UTILITY DESIGN INC. 7,800.00 0.00 7,800.00 A1' 00381456 07/05/2017 CANGA, SHARON 53.96 0.00 53.96 AP 00381457 07/05/2017 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 110.33 0.00 110.33 AP 00381458 07/05/2017 CENTENO, JASON 332.00 0.00 332.00 AP 00381459 07/05/2017 CHAMPION AWARDS AND SPECIALTIES 19.40 0.00 19.40 AP 00381460 07/05/2017 CINTAS CORPORATION # 150 0.00 113.58 113.58 AP 00381461 07/05/2017 CL BUILDERS & DEVELOPMENT INC. 742.00 0.00 742.00 AP 00381462 07/05/2017 CLARK, KAREN 378.00 0.00 378.00 AP 00381463 07/05/2017 CLASSE PARTY RENTALS 22.89 0.00 22.89 AP 00381464 07/05/2017 CLOUGHESY, DONALD 0.00 320.00 320.00 AP 00381465 07/05/2017 CONCEPT POWDER COATING 450.00 0.00 450.00 AP 00381466 07/05/2017 COSTAR REALTY INFORMATION INC 1,332.06 0.00 1,332.06 AP 00381467 07/05/2017 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 2,761.09 0.00 2,761.09 AP 00381468 07/05/2017 DANCE TERRIFIC 1,277.50 0.00 1,277.50 AP 00381469 07/05/2017 DATA ARC LLC 14,441.15 0.00 14,441.15 AP 00381470 07/05/2017 DLIMAGING 1,777.36 0.00 1,777.36 AP 00381471 07/05/2017 DOG WASTE DEPOT 381.40 0.00 381.40 AP 00381472 07/05/2017 EDWARDSON, JESSICA 250.00 0.00 250.00 AP 00381473 07/05/2017 ELECNOR BELCO ELECTRIC INC 61,397.74 0.00 61,397.74 AP 00381474 07/05/2017 ENN GEE CORP. 4,175.00 0.00 4,175.00 AP 00381475 07/05/2017 EXECUTIVE AUTO DETAIL 680.00 0.00 680.00 AP 00381476 07/05/2017 FORTIN LAW GROUP 14,277.92 0.00 14,277.92 AP 00381478 07/05/2017 FRONTIER COMM 9,099.08 1,075.80 10,174.88 *** User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 17 Current Date: 07/11/2017 Report: CK -AGENDA -PEG -PORTRAIT -,CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 15:32:57 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P18 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 6/13/2017 through 7/10/2017 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Cit v Fire Amount AP 00381479 07/05/2017 FRONTIER FORD 0.00 154,100.45 154.100.45 AP 00381480 07/05/2017 G AND M BUSINESS INTERIORS 239.10 0.00 239.10 AP 00381481 07/05/2017 GEOGRAPHICS 2,252.78 0.00 2.252.78 AP 00381482 07/05/2017 GLOBALSTAR USA 95.79 0.00 95.79 AP 00381483 07/05/2017 GOOD YEAR TIRE AND RUBBER CO. 1,147.28 0.00 1,147.28 AP 00381484 07/05/2017 GRACIANO, TAMMIE 0.00 83.37 83.37 AP 00381485 07/05/2017 GRAINGER 237.72 0.00 237.72 AP 00381486 07/05/2017 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 1,467.82 0.00 1,467.82 AP 00381487 07/05/2017 GYROSCOPE INC 19,000.00 0.00 19.000.00 AP 00381488 07/05/2017 HERITAGE EDUCATION GROUP 150.00 0.00 150.00 AP 00381489 07/05/2017 HI WAY SAFETY INC 1,043.41 0.00 1.043.41 AP 00381490 07/05/2017 HOLLAND, BRANDIE 150.00 0.00 150.00 AP 00381491 07/05/2017 HOSE MAN INC 0.00 50.93 50.93 AP 00381492 07/05/2017 HUNTINGTON HARDWARE 485.03 0.00 485.03 AP 00381493 07/05/2017 INLAND VALLEY DANCE ACADEMY 2,076.00 0.00 2,076.00 AP 00381494 07/05/2017 J & D GUILLIAM CONSTRUCTION INC 2,160.00 0.00 2,160.00 AP 00381495 07/05/2017 JOHN BURR CYCLES INC 908.69 0.00 908.69 All 00381496 07/05/2017 JOHNNY ALLEN TENNIS ACADEMY 642.60 0.00 642.60 AP 00381497 07/05/2017 JOHNSON MACHINERY COMPANY 0.00 889.14 889.14 AP 00381498 07/05/2017 KRESTLAKE, KELLY 18.00 0.00 18.00 All 00381499 07/05/2017 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 770.00 1,628.00 2,398.00 *** AP 00381500 07/05/2017 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 3,590.00 0.00 3,590.00 AP 00381501 07/05/2017 LOS ANGELES ENGINEERING INC 23,687.94 0.00 23,687.94 AI' 00381502 07/05/2017 LOS ANGELES FREIGHTLINER 0.00 385.08 385.08 AP 00381503 07/05/2017 MARIPOSA LANDSCAPES INC 62,131.98 0.00 62,131.98 AP 00381504 07/05/2017 MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL INC 9,590.00 0.00 9,590.00 AP 00381505 07/05/2017 MIDWEST TAPE 250.25 0.00 250.25 AP 00381506 07/05/2017 MIG 300.00 0.00 300.00 AP 00381507 07/05/2017 MIJAC ALARM COMPANY 29.00 0.00 29.00 AP 00381508 07/05/2017 MINUTEMAN PRESS 377.97 0.00 377.97 AP 00381509 07/05/2017 MITCHELL, REBECCA 17.14 0.00 17.14 AP 00381510 07/05/2017 MORRIS, DOUG 250.00 0.00 250.00 AP 00381511 07/05/2017 MORRIS, RICHARD 126.00 0.00 126.00 AP 00381512 07/05/2017 MOUNTAIN VIEW GLASS AND MIRROR INC 921.31 0.00 921.31 AI' 00381513 07/05/2017 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 50.53 0.00 50.53 AP 00381514 07/05/2017 NEWCOMB ANDERSON MCCORMICK INC 784.00 616.00 1.400.00 *** AP 00381515 07/05/2017 OPARC 396.00 0.00 396.00 AP 00381516 07/05/2017 OPEN APPS INC 10,400.00 0.00 10,400.00 AP 00381517 07/05/2017 PACIFIC YOUTH SPORTS 1,287.00 0.00 1,287.00 AP 00381518 07/05/2017 PEPE'S TOWING SERVICE 160.00 0.00 160.00 AP 00381519 07/05/2017 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 517.24 0.00 517.24 AP 00381520 07/05/2017 PHOENIX GROUP INFORMATION SYSTEMS 3,413.53 0.00 3.413.53 AP 00381521 07/05/2017 PRECISION GYMNASTICS 3,274.39 0.00 3,274.39 AP 00381522 07/05/2017 PRESENTATION MEDIA INC 2,480.00 0.00 2,480.00 AP 00381523 07/05/2017 PRO -ACT INC 250.00 0.00 250.00 AP 00381524 07/05/2017 PRO -LINE INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS INC 1,413.68 0.00 1,413.68 AP 00381525 07/05/2017 PSA PRINT GROUP 127.15 0.00 127.15 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 18 Current Date: 07/11/2017 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRA IT-CON SOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 15:32:57 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P19 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 6/13/2017 through 7/10/2017 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Citv Fire Amount AP 00381526 07/05/2017 PW GILLIBRAND INC 1,699.55 0.00 1,699.55 AP 00381527 07/05/2017 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 281.36 0.00 281.36 AP 00381528 07/05/2017 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FONTANA FAMILY YMCA 8,937.14 0.00 8,937.14 A1' 00381529 07/05/2017 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 78.12 0.00 78.12 AP 00381530 07/05/2017 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 71,373.97 0.00 71,373.97 AP 00381531 07/05/2017 RODRIGUEZ INC, RY 0.00 230.50 230.50 AP 00381532 07/05/2017 ROYAL WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 0.00 367.97 367.97 AP 00381533 07/05/2017 SAFE -ENTRY TECHNICAL INC 0.00 2,653.04 2.653.04 AP 00381534 07/05/2017 SAN BERNARDINO CO AUDITOR CONT 7,969.50 0.00 7,969.50 AP 00381535 07/05/2017 SAN BERNARDINO, CITY OF 1,067.22 0.00 1,067.22 AP 00381536 07/05/2017 SCHAEFER, PAUL 184.88 0.00 184.88 All 00381537 07/05/2017 SERPE, KRISTIN 80.00 0.00 80.00 AP 00381538 07/05/2017 SILVER & WRIGHT LLP 3,298.42 0.00 31298.42 AP 00381539 07/05/2017 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 1,197.88 0.00 1.197.88 AI' 00381540 07/05/2017 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 6,258.81 297.88 6,556.69 *** AP 00381541 07/05/2017 SOCIAL VOCATIONAL SERVICES 3,388.00 0.00 3,388.00 AP 00381542 07/05/2017 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 9,339.64 0.00 9,339.64 AP 00381543 07/05/2017 SOUTHERN COUNTIES LUBRICANTS LLC 0.00 5,142.70 5.142.70 AP 00381544 07/05/2017 SOUTHLAND SPORTS OFFICIALS 184.00 0.00 184.00 AP 00381545 07/05/2017 STERLING COFFEE SERVICE 1,762.78 0.00 1.762.78 AI' 00381546 07/05/2017 STOTZ EQUIPMENT 81.64 0.00 81.64 AP 00381547 07/05/2017 SUPERION LLC 427.20 0.00 427.20 AP 00381548 07/05/2017 TERRA VISTA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 100.00 0.00 100.00 AP 00381549 07/05/2017 THOMSON REUTERS WEST PUBLISHING CORP 898.65 0.00 898.65 AP 00381550 07/05/2017 TOSCANO, PATRICIO 789.55 0.00 789.55 AP 00381551 07/05/2017 UNIVERSAL MARTIAL ARTS CENTERS 472.50 0.00 472.50 AP 00381552 07/05/2017 UPS 64.89 0.00 64.89 AP 00381553 07/05/2017 VALVERDE SCHOOL OF PERFORMING ARTS 11,689.00 0.00 11,689.00 AP 00381554 07/05/2017 VICTOR MEDICAL COMPANY 689.82 0.00 689.82 AP 00381555 07/05/2017 WEBBER, DEBORAH 32.75 0.00 32.75 AP 00381556 07/05/2017 WHITE HOUSE PHOTO INC 130.00 0.00 130.00 AP 00381557 07/05/2017 WILDLIFE LEARNING CENTER 1,220.00 0.00 17220.00 AP 00381558 07/05/2017 YAMADA ENTERPRISES 24,447.53 0.00 24,447.53 AP 00381559 07/05/2017 YORK INDUSTRIES 947.12 0.00 947.12 AP 00381560 07/05/2017 ZOETIS US LLC 1,516.04 0.00 1,516.04 AP 00381561 07/05/2017 ZONES CORPORATE SOLUTIONS 0.00 6,182.35 6,182.35 AP 00381562 07/05/2017 3SI SECURITY SYSTEMS 1,080.00 0.00 1.080.00 AP 00381563 07/05/2017 ADDY, MARK 400.00 0.00 400.00 AP 00381564 07/05/2017 AFLAC GROUP INSURANCE 40.97 0.00 40.97 AP 00381565 07/05/2017 AGUILERA, ISAIAH 972.00 0.00 972.00 AP 00381566 07/05/2017 CAL PERS LONG TERM CARE 286.21 0.00 286.21 AP 00381567 07/05/2017 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 302.32 0.00 302.32 AP 00381568 07/05/2017 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 8.44 0.00 8.44 All 00381569 07/05/2017 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 100.00 0.00 100.00 All 00381570 07/05/2017 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 60.00 0.00 60.00 AP 00381571 07/05/2017 CFCA-EMS SECTION -SOUTHERN DIVISION 0.00 150.00 150.00 AP 00381572 07/05/2017 CITRUS BELT CHAPTER I.C.C. 15.00 0.00 15.00 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 19 Current Date: 07/11/2017 Report: CK -AGENDA -REG -PORTRAIT -CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 15:32:57 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P20 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 6/13/2017 through 7/10/2017 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Cit v Fire Amount AP 00381573 07/05/2017 CITRUS BELT CHAPTER I.C.C. 200.00 0.00 200.00 AP 00381574 07/05/2017 CRITERION PICTURES USA INC 2,480.00 0.00 2.480.00 AP 00381575 07/05/2017 DELTA DENTAL 1,415.44 0.00 1,415.44 AP 00381576 07/05/2017 DELTA DENTAL 40,470.33 0.00 40,470.33 AP 00381577 07/05/2017 DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 288.50 0.00 288.50 AP 00381578 07/05/2017 DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 1,883.86 0.00 1,883.86 AP 00381579 07/05/2017 DUPPER, PHILLIP 400.00 0.00 400.00 AP 00381580 07/05/2017 ENGSTROM, DANIEL 1,200.00 0.00 1.200.00 AP 00381581 07/05/2017 FOLKENS, KIM 400.00 0.00 400.00 AP 00381582 07/05/2017 FRONTIER COMM 1,015.33 0.00 1,015.33 AP 00381583 07/05/2017 GALE/CENGAGE LEARNING 16,807.79 0.00 16.807.79 AP 00381584 07/05/2017 GRAEBER, DIANNE 833.00 0.00 833.00 AP 00381585 07/05/2017 GRANT III, VINCENT 972.00 0.00 972.00 AP 00381586 07/05/2017 HUDSON AUDIO WORKS 3,000.00 0.00 3,000.00 AP 00381587 07/05/2017 IATSE NATIONAL HEALTH & WELFARE FUNDS 300.00 0.00 300.00 AP 00381588 07/05/2017 JOHNSON, CHEARICE 486.00 0.00 486.00 AP 00381589 07/05/2017 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INC 205,096.55 0.00 205,096.55 AP 00381590 07/05/2017 KERRY, DANIELLE 1,000.00 0.00 1.000.00 AP 00381591 07/05/2017 KONG, SOPHEAK 486.00 0.00 486.00 AP 00381592 07/05/2017 MANCHESTER GRAND HYATT SAN DIEGO 1,240.60 0.00 1,240.60 AP 00381593 07/05/2017 MANCHESTER GRAND HYATT SAN DIEGO 1,240.60 0.00 1,240.60 AP 00381594 07/05/2017 MANCHESTER GRAND HYATT SAN DIEGO 1.240.60 0.00 1,240.60 AP 00381595 07/05/2017 MANCHESTER GRAND HYATT SAN DIEGO 1,240.60 0.00 1.240.60 AP 00381596 07/05/2017 MANCHESTER GRAND HYATT SAN DIEGO 1,240.60 0.00 1,240.60 AP 00381597 07/05/2017 MANCHESTER GRAND HYATT SAN DIEGO 1,240.60 0.00 1,240.60 AI' 00381598 07/05/2017 MANCHESTER GRAND HYATT SAN DIEGO 1,959.72 0.00 1.959.72 AI' 00381599 07/05/2017 MANCHESTER GRAND HYATT SAN DIEGO 1,959.72 0.00 1,959.72 AP 00381600 07/05/2017 MANCHESTER GRAND HYATT SAN DIEGO 1,959.72 0.00 1.959.72 AP 00381601 07/05/2017 MANCHESTER GRAND HYATT SAN DIEGO 1,959.72 0.00 1,959.72 AP 00381602 07/05/2017 MANCHESTER GRAND HYATT SAN DIEGO 979.86 0.00 979.86 AI' 00381603 07/05/2017 MANCHESTER GRAND HYATT SAN DIEGO 979.86 0.00 979.86 AI' 00381604 07/05/2017 MANCHESTER GRAND HYATT SAN DIEGO 979.86 0.00 979.86 AP 00381605 07/05/2017 MANCHESTER GRAND HYATT SAN DIEGO 979.86 0.00 979.86 AP 00381606 07/05/2017 MMASC 85.00 0.00 85.00 AP 00381607 07/05/2017 MURGUTA, MARISELA 600.00 0.00 600.00 AP 00381608 07/05/2017 NEOPOST USA INC 266.93 0.00 266.93 AP 00381609 07/05/2017 NIMAKO, SOLOMON 972.00 0.00 972.00 AP 00381610 07/05/2017 PINO, KAREN 275.00 0.00 275.00 AP 00381611 07/05/2017 PRE -PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 96.59 0.00 96.59 AP 00381612 07/05/2017 RAYENHARTZ, DAVID 400.00 0.00 400.00 AP 00381613 07/05/2017 SBPEA 957.19 0.00 957.19 AP 00381614 07/05/2017 SEYBERT, NICKALAUS 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00381615 07/05/2017 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 446.95 0.00 446.95 AP 00381616 07/05/2017 SIPHOMSAY, SID 486.00 0.00 486.00 AP 00381617 07/05/2017 STORAGE CONTAINER.COM 132.00 0.00 132.00 AP 00381618 07/05/2017 THEATRE n BOSTON COURT, THE 100.00 0.00 100.00 AP 00381619 07/05/2017 TOWN AND COUNTRY RESORT 1,072.65 0.00 1,072.65 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 20 Current Date: 07/11/2017 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 15:32:57 Total City: $5,696,998.81 Total Fire: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Grand Total: $8,122,836.49 P21 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 6/13/2017 through 7/10/2017 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name LLq Fire Amount AP 00381620 07/05/2017 UNITED SCENIC ARTISTS PENSION AND WELFARE FU 200.00 0.00 200.00 AP 00381621 07/05/2017 UNITED WAY 124.00 0.00 124.00 AP 00381622 07/05/2017 WILSON, RYAN 972.00 0.00 972.00 AP 00381623 07/05/2017 YERO, ART 486.00 0.00 486.00 AP 00381624 07/05/2017 YOUNG, MELINDA 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00381625 07/05/2017 ZAPATA, ALEX 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00381626 07/06/2017 CHAFFEY JNT UN HIGH SCHL DIST 5,990.61 0.00 5,990.61 AP 00381627 07/06/2017 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 241.16 534.92 776.08 *** AP 00381628 07/06/2017 NEWMAN, ARNIE 1,200.00 0.00 1,200.00 AI' 00381629 07/06/2017 TOSCANO, PATRICIO 789.55 0.00 789.55 AP 00381630 07/06/2017 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 0.00 142.10 142.10 AP 00381631 07/06/2017 LN CURTIS AND SONS 0.00 25.81 25.81 AP 00381632 07/06/2017 OFFICE DEPOT 2,107.95 0.00 2,107.95 AP 00381633 07/06/2017 HAMPTON YOGA 1,044.00 0.00 1,044.00 Total City: $5,696,998.81 Total Fire: $2,425,837.68 Grand Total: $8,122,836.49 Note: *** Check Number includes both City and Fire District expenditures User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 21 Current Date: 07/11/2017 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG-PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 15:32:57 P22 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Electronic Debit Register June 1, 2017 - June 30, 2017 DATE DESCRIPTION CITY FIRE AMOUNT 6/1 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 592.04 592.04 6/2 AUTHNET GATEWAY BILLING CCD 96613508 63.40 63.40 6/2 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 487.00 487.00 6/2 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 112.47 112.47 6/5 WIRE TRANSFER - To RDASA RORF - Payment of Forest Invoice 305,314.00 305,314.00 6/5 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 781.30 781.30 6/5 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 105.79 105.79 6/7 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT - Child Support Payments 2,330.33 2,330.33 6/7 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT - Child Support Payments 4,254.29 4,254.29 6/7 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 117.18 117.18 6/7 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 79.03 79.03 6/8 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 4,562.73 4,562.73 6/8 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 234.62 234.62 6/9 CALPERS - City - Retirement Account Deposit 49,870.84 49,870.84 6/9 CALPERS - City - Retirement Account Deposit 190,742 67 190,742.67 6/9 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 1,878.86 1,878.86 6/9 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 2,183.63 2,183.63 6/9 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 5,989.11 5,989.11 6/9 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 6,393.36 6,393.36 6/9 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 6,885.17 6,885.17 6/9 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 106,977.59 106,977.59 6/9 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 1,445.23 1,445.23 6/12 WIRE TRANSFER - To California ISO 52,472.92 52,472.92 6112 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 2,487.01 2,487.01 6/12 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 1,331.28 1,331.28 6/13 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 12.00 12.00 6/14 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 6,752.52 6,752.52 6/14 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 975.88 975.88 6/15 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 5,664.65 5,664.65 6/15 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 8,532.49 8,532.49 6/16 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 1,336.03 1,336.03 6/16 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 2,023.28 2,023.28 6/19 WIRE TRANSFER - To California ISO 2,013.69 2,013.69 6/19 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 1,844.27 1,844.27 6/20 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 606.82 606.82 6/20 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 772.53 772.53 6/21 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 1,229.72 1,229.72 6/21 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 595.20 595.20 6/22 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT - Child Support Payments 4,791.70 4,791.70 6/22 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 1,762.00 1,762.00 6/22 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 2,640.00 2,640.00 6/23 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT- Child Support Payments 2,330.33 2,330.33 6123 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 396.21 396.21 6123 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 1,395.42 1,395.42 6126 ANALYSIS DEFICIT - Bank Fee - June 2017 18,208.61 18,208.61 6/26 WIRE TRANSFER - To California ISO 14,654.83 14,654.83 6/26 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 2,767.90 2,767.90 6/27 CALPERS - City - Retirement Account Deposit 50,862.95 50,862.95 6/27 CALPERS - City - Retirement Account Deposit 187,929.53 187,929.53 6/27 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 1,587.13 1,587.13 6/27 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 2,150.03 2,150.03 6/27 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 5,989.10 5,989.10 6/27 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 6,393.36 6,393.36 6127 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 6,885.17 6,885.17 6/27 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 106,977.60 106,977.60 6/27 WIRE TRANSFER - To Villa Pacifica Il, LP - Project Loan Draw #1 439,280.04 439,280.04 6/27 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 2,277.09 2,277.09 6/27 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 2,980.95 2,980.95 6/28 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 976.72 976.72 P23 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Electronic Debit Register June 1, 2017 -June 30, 2017 DATE DESCRIPTION CITY FIRE AMOUNT 6/28 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 804.71 804.71 6/29 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 3,987.66 3,987.66 6/29 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 833.03 833.03 6/30 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 732.13 732.13 6/30 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 95.00 95.00 $ 1,354,456.04 $ 295,284.09 GRAND TOTAL $ 1,649,740.13 Z v ii 0 c 0 E ti rn o N (D cc N O O O M cL O 7p c O 00. va w W LOM c W CD M .0 O� y L s m O V O N I ti n O M N N m Of N� m m n M r r r 1n n � M O1 [*.7 I p m O1 O N 1O n rn v m to n ty r r � Ln I M m N M M n •-- •- ao � rn m l 0 a m N N tp 0 N N m O 00i• m � O N N m O r O roi q O tmG r O r Of O � O O W O OMf O 001 n v V N O1 co 0 O M A oaoowo m m � tri N C N V O M 1t7 0 O n m N N m 1[1 O1 N N rn o � rn u1 0 vv_ v_ o coco O m O O O O N IT 0 0 0 0 O n O O O O m m m O O O O1 O O O m 0 v 1n .n a o m o m a r r fA O rn n t0 N r - M M O O to N O M 1, LL _ CD o O co N O v co rn _} to t0 t0 v lL C O) Mco Lo O1 M C C1 V W LO N (6 cli c0 n c O LO O M d C -31 +L+ YD C d m a E f0 -O t -y c d M.& N C v OE O tB O_ L C to E d N 7 N > 'O C C - CD 0)a L X w N 0'a CL M U Q n to Cl cL N O L; E r X .N Q ani C CL N N 'O N t9 N v E - O 0. >, cv E.cr c 3 m c= c Li j O U O E Q U rn to L U > > Y N 6-2 N tN U t0 Ma. U) m N O O C M 2 c w 12 o1 Q to d d d CD , LL d — S2 g c > O C F U LL _ CD o O co N O v co rn _} to t0 t0 v lL C O) Mco Lo O1 M C C1 V W LO N (6 cli c0 n c O LO O M d C -31 +L+ YD C d m a E f0 -O t -y c d M.& N C v OE O tB O_ L C to E d N 7 N > 'O C C - CD 0)a L X w N 0'a CL M U Q n to Cl cL N O L; E r X .N Q ani C CL N N 'O N t9 N v E - O 0. >, cv E.cr c 3 m mt 2 C C N E N C1 to L U > E a •C m C 6-2 N t0 Ma. at a O U tU N N > 0 - c m - to rny> V L U 4) td N lU C C > y - °' E ci �m0 o ac E m0 N 0 O O CL' - 2 C N tU •- fA V! C .L. O O O N :E C N_ E0) Q > J P24 W a C N w Q m cn n n LL ^ _OCL r > O LL p LL G O d a P25 V W W O! O O O N W W T T O O O O O N N W O W D1 O O cp O N 450 N N N N O O 0 0 0 O O O O O O N N N N O O O O O O N N N N O O O 0 0 0 N N 0 0 0 O O W< Q: M M Q d m N N N N N N N N N N N o CO M M 01 [� h o N N N N N N o V V o o f0 N N N N N N O o h W a0 O N N N N N 1� W O1 M cn U- r n o 0 �p N N N N C O N N z N N N N M M M N N N Q N N N N N O N 2 j ('O (n fn On O� o M M (n in W w M N r (n o(� (� On in w o dLL� > v Y O O n m C r r W W N O1 W M W W R O W O) W N W R W N N N t` W M OC N W W O M M O (A n O M M r W W V O m d O1 O r M M ct W cl cl co W N O N M O O R W r N c1 W W co N N o d � .- r a W co O O N O O O O O O N O O N R O O O O O O O 0 0 0 R o o O O r, 1n N N M M N c+W) w) 0) W W O O O cp IT OA O N O (- h Q) V7 LC) O O N N M N W O N 0 0 0 W 0 0 0 W W W N N O 9 O O O O M M '(f h O) O O O O ci ci - Ci cp - IT 9 r 9"" Ci N - -- N N - - m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m al m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m ¢¢ ¢ ¢a a ¢¢ ¢ ¢¢ ¢ ¢¢ ¢ ¢a a a¢ ¢ ¢¢ ¢ ¢¢ a a V U) o N cp O1 450 N d ti C C O N ( d m N O a0 m c m o o 0 �p C V a N m L a' CL o O M ('O f N N (p > v Y O O n m 0 0 a m aD T V U) N E 450 C d d ti C C O N ( d m N O M 'M O a0 m c m o o 0 �p C V a N m L a' CL R a O O O7 N O O W Oo O1 � W o 0 0 0 0 rn ori W (o O N Z LL z Z r W r (n W z r w La J ¢ Uc O iO J O a 'O y C 7 LL C G N O E O U) C tm T V C N Q O 0 J cn Is O coCi C Lf) C ¢ Z w O 11J U LL O Y Z m Z O 2 O O N 0 O U) Ci N v O W v 00 a co co IRF N (u Of d a> c m O a U) fq 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o OO O o o 0 0 O o 0 O O O O O o W O O W W O1 h N O O N W W W N O O O O m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ci 0 (i W O1 M O1 O N O N N M N W O W N N N N O W M n W O W W O O O M W 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O W O1 O O O W W O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LLY N O O O In W O O W N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O W M N O O O W O O M W W O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O W M O O O N O 0 0 0 (A O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O M O1 M O O O W W 0 0 0 W M O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O (A OA O o 0 O Of n1 0 0 0 (A (n O O O O O O O W O O O O O O O V O1 O N O O< O1 0 0 0 S M O 0 0 0 N W O O O cc7 O7 O O V7 O O 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N O O O o 0 O O W O 0 0 0 O O O O O O O R O O O O cn 0 00 0 O) W O O W r O O r O < M m N W N O N N co O vo N O] R ON c0 w h N cV aD (O r r r M O O M N W N W V O O M O M N W O h W M M O W r W O O1 v O M R O W W M W M N W O7 'Q W � Ci v: v W r C) r D) W W 0 W W OM O M v W O W (a W T o a) 0) N h N M D1 D1 O W W OA W 01 (n O O1 Of M W c O W v W '(f c (n v W h a r � O O < W T sf O1 O1 O W R ('� O) fA O O v < 01 �- O O1 � q 01 Of R R � � � •- �- � � N � N N � � N � cV N .- � � � r N � � � O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 O O O O O O 0 0 0 O O O o O O O O O O O O O O O O o 0 0 0 0 o O O O O O O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O O O O O O O O O o o o O O O O O O O O O o 0 0 0 0 O O o 0 0 C C o q O O o C C C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O O O o O o o o 0 0 0 0 o o o o o Ln o o o o 0 0 0 o o o o o O o o o 0 o o o O 00 o o o o cn o o 00 0 00 W O o o o o o 0 cO o O lr o O N O O O O cO M O O O O N O) O O O N cn O O N IT N N- N N -- N N N N N N N N N N N N- N - N N N M R OO V1 (D W W r M M V W co (D W rl h W W W r� rl M cf) N o N 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O OO O O O 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O� O Ma) O1 c� r- 0 0) N (n 0 0 0 O O t` o w 0 h 0 o W (n N M N N .- O N N N NN N M c\) M c\ N O` N c` N N M N N co m W o M M 0 N (n W c� M W cM M V) a a o o (n O O O .- O o o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 o O O O -- o CL n. n. (L CL w w w w w Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y O O O O O Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y U U O U U a¢ Q ¢¢ ¢ ¢¢ Z ZZ Z ZZ Z ZZ OOO C90Z Z ZZ z Z m m m m m M M M Q¢ Q Q Q Q¢¢¢ F F- I- L L F F F F F F M M M M M M m m m to to N fn (n (N 00 0 0❑ 0 00 Z Z Z Z Z Z Z z z z z z z z a a a a a a w w w w w w w w ¢¢¢ ¢¢¢ ¢¢¢ ¢¢¢ ¢¢ O O O O O O W O O D O O O O O O O O O O O F F F F F- 0 F U U U U U U U J J J J J J J J J J J J J J W W W W W W W W W W W W W W J J J J J J L¢L laL (aL L¢L LL lai LL l¢i 2 5 2 2 2= S== S 2 2= 2 Z Z z Z Z Z J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J w w www www www www www wwwwww www w w w W w w w w w w w w w W W W w w w w w w w w w w w w w w LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL c C. 7 O U ( Ot� O W W W r 7 N V LQ V O1 r W O N N M O M O r� W r W W M N r W W W O M W W W fA 0 0 W W O O O M W f` r n W U) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 y U) T V C d W W N N W W W t` p O N 0 O N O1 M N a N W M O ¢ C�9 i �c W� m S N 0 a D W CL > > (n N nd a N❑ cn d V U❑ W LL LL U. 0= M M O � Go CD CD ¢ d CO W a) Q¢ N O N N m CD ww w LULU W ww co W ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢¢ ¢¢ C9 (9 (D C9 C7C� C9 aC9 C9 Q -O M M M M M M M M M M O O O O 0 0 0 st v v v C co W W W W W (D M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M LL (o (o (h m (h (+) t+) m m ch T- o 71 d m m IL F� i V � o N O O 4) 1n O o 0 o co o v N E N N I- N 0 N N N N N N N O V C U) n N N 1+7 10+) 000 1(D L0 t9 M �- O O O O (D;D-�� Of LL ' o O o ;� v IL C r o d a IL Lo pp d4 �c O OD RI C T '0V a00 m Q R � � N 1 o N O O m �2 1n O o 0 o co o v m O o N N I- N 0 N N N N N N O O 100 U) N N N 1+7 10+) 000 1(D cn N a� I M �- O O O O (D;D-�� Of N o N � N 0 0 0 0 C 0 O f0 r co M M M V Lo pp Lo O OD 00 T '0V a00 N N M M fn0 co Cl)� m O o w 0 O ` N N N O O M It N 07I N tq O O 0 o O N T N 10 0D 00 0 0 0 0 0 N O I .- 0 cc m 0 91W 0 0t 0t 0 0 m 0 a a a a a a s a 1�i In uoi I 0 m M M v 0 0 0 OD O O ry q N ro R O fOn N o oU� n tq !n N N r r O O N O O V O O N w 0) a0 O O e9 O O O O C� 00 10 r f� O O 1+1 p Z O C 0 0 0 v f01n W O O O O co O O O O O 0o O m 0o V' O O W 01 It o R O O O 19 a> j O O O 1n O ? O 01 O O 0 1n 0) a O 1n O 1n O n 0 m m M N a Of m W m } C] cc Z> °� j a a' LL N 0 0 0 0 m o 1` W C v n C N 1n O 1 O O O O 1n O o 0 o co o v 1n n O o O O I- 0 co O O 0 w N O O 100 U) N N N 1+7 10+) 000 1(D N I r �- 0 Of W f0 < R 0 N N N C4 C R O f0 r co M M M V Lo O O O 1D _ O o r r r o 0 0 r 10 M M m o ` co m m co 0 O 00 O n 0 M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 91W 0 0t 0t 0 0 0 0 0 a 1�i In uoi I 0 m M M v 0 0 0 y z tq !n U S 2 O. C O O U O. N N N U) N_ N N N (j o N M 7 N N 0 d N c0+`7 0 N N C N V f0 r Co a O w 0 N N co 1D _ O o r O 00 r o 0 0 O M M m o ` co m m co O O n M v O a of 91W N O ~ a 1�i In CD w 0 w J 00 y z tq !n U S 2 a Q O O O w tp V p Z O w w a. Z 9; 9; CE Q Q M rn a> j rn O rn ? J d } C] d Z> °� a a' LL N a a D w w 0 0 c c Q c w c LL LL U U 0 0 0 0 a a a a C O N fp y N O. C O O U O. O U) o o (j o 7 N N N d V 7 C V Co a m N co _ O 00 N M M N ` LL m m F rn M f0 N O O O O N 'O C O m 0) 10 N 0 N O m m 17 v 1n 1n C v O O O r- 1r0 O O v P26 wa 95 Q LL O a O I LL Ct0 n i a o_ 0 C) 0 m a0 a O n C of ai r O O O 0 0 0 o O 0 0 mm m " 0 0 cOi O O V 0 C;N N CD Ci M N _N O A t00 n R3 ae E 0 MC d� �3 w La o o 0 g ui U) � N NN O ++ V r C CV t a o •` N M 0 0 N It d O CL Im H t0 O O` o« CL O •;' m•o �ti Q N LL d v « dWE NU I L C N a O n C of ai r O O O 0 0 0 o O 0 0 mm m " 0 0 cOi O O V 0 C;N N CD Ci M O t00 n MC w La o o < g ui m o.= of O Q Ci a O N N It Ci Ci t0 O 0 CD A a co 0 � ; N O O D z LL LL z g w z CO O W J z Q U EE z Y W O E z E Q U) to N z y N h W U) TU T O C O « j O C O C CL O w _ O U N � y o C) Oy 0 a0 O) U) C N C a+ U) N L C v O O v m z OI O N l0 C d o y o d O J N d N lL H U O n V O V) n O C0 8 M A a CD co N P27 LU a o In q5 Q fO1O I I w C O v O 0 .N a. O 0 CL N L w LL U M C .O C O m O �a U N O z, a L a o r cn N T C 0 N OR < C) 00 v CD LL P28 a� E Y C G Y U C LL N � O U O) Q V 20 V � U . L 0 U p Q J N w C O v O 0 .N a. O 0 CL N L w LL U M C .O C O m O �a U N O z, a L a o r cn N T C 0 N OR < C) 00 v CD LL P28 i 0 0 ♦"� v� Qi 'L 0 U ado L_ �� 0 iZ L M 00 a 0 s c ca OC Oo O O O O O O O p O O O O O O O O O O O M M CD L6 193 -OV O of - M � N N 0 N M OI N N m 0 t Ice i M Oo O O O O O O O p O O O O O O O O O O O M M N L6 193 -OV O N E2 �o a� } IT cn ca a) } M N (o a) } M N cn ca a) } N L C O 2 N LN P29 P30 STAFF REPORT DATE: July 19, 2017 TO: President and Members of the Board of Directors FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Mike Costello, Fire Chief W,/ Don Cloughesy, Deputy Fire Chief Mike McCliman, Deputy Fire Chief v Ruth Cain, Procurement Manager 7: Pamela Pane, Management Analyst III Q� SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE A PURCHASE OF ONE (1) TYPE ONE FIRE ENGINE FROM KME, OF NESQUEHONING, PA RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Fire Board award the purchase of one (1) Type One Fire Engine to KME, of Nesquehoning, PA, per RFP #16/17-017, as budgeted for the Fire Protection District. BACKGROUND: This new apparatus will replace unit #69-00 (KME 65' Tele -Squirt) Type I Engine. That engine was placed in service in 2000 (17 years old) and is currently at 85,000 miles. It is used as a reserve Type 1 Engine. However, it is configured with a 65' aerial stream because it was originally purchased to fill a gap in conjunction with the rescue apparatus as a second truck to meet requirements for Insurance Services Office, Inc. (ISO) ratings. The District's current fleet is made up of two (2) frontline Truck Companies and one (1) Reserve Truck, making unit #69-00 obsolete. With the aerial stream, it is much larger than the current fleet's Type 1 Engine and has experienced additional maintenance issues. The cumbersome configuration and higher maintenance costs make this the best choice for surplus. Additionally, due to the vehicle's low mileage, it may result in a higher sale price (especially if consignment sales options can be explored — as opposed to the standard surplus system). National fire service standards recommend front line apparatus be considered for replacement after 10 years of service, moved into reserve status for 5 years, then be removed from the fleet (National Fire Protection Association 1901, "Standard for Automotive Fire Apparatus", 2009 ed.). Since this is a guideline only, other factors are also considered when scheduling the replacement of fire apparatus. A few of those factors are: maintenance costs, current regulatory requirements and performance. ANALYSIS: Fire District staff provided detailed specifications for one (1) Type 1 Fire Engine to the Procurement Division. Formal RFP #16/17-017 was prepared and posted on March 20, 2017, to the City's automated procurement system. As a result, there were one hundred ninety-nine (199) Page 1 of 2 APPROVE A PURCHASE OF ONE (1) TYPE ONE FIRE ENGINE JULY 19, 2017 vendors notified, ten (10) vendors downloaded the RFP documentation, and one (1) vendor responded. The Procurement Division conducted a vendor outreach to analyze the lack of vendor response and found that vendors could not participate due to being too busy at the time or just missed the solicitation altogether. Fire District and Procurement staff conducted a thorough analysis of the proposal from KME and determined that it met the District's specifications and found that the cost is comparable to the current market cost. All applicable documentation for RFP #16/17-017 is on file in the City's electronic procurement system and can be located through the City's Internet. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds were budgeted for the Type One Fire Engine in FY2016/17 in Fire Protection Capital FundlCapital Outlay-Vehiclesl Replacement Fire Engine Account No. 3288501-5604 in the amount of $650,000; however, the lowest, most responsible, responsive bid came in over the budgeted amount at $727,814.62. Hence, the District also asks approval of an appropriation in the amount of $77,820 from Fire District Capital Reserves to Account No. 3288501-5604. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: PUBLIC SAFETY The District continues the practice and philosophy of long term sustainability through a value added service. The purchase of this, and future, apparatus will meet those objectives by: (1) planning and budgeting "with a pay as you go" approach; (2) staying up to date with changes in industry standards while providing a safe and effective means for delivering an "All -Risk" service to the people that live, work and visit our community. By replacing an obsolete apparatus design, that has 17 year old emission standards, with a modern apparatus that meets all current safety and emission standards, the District will have a much safer, more practical, and air quality conscious apparatus within our community. ATTACHMENTS: None Page 2 of 2 P31 P32 STAFF REPORT DATE: July 19, 2017 TO: President and Members of the Board of Directors FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager J INITIATED BY: Mike Costello, Fire Chief Ivan Rojer, Deputy Fire Chief Pamela Pane, Management Analyst I II SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT RENEWAL FOR TRIMESTER USE OF FORCE TRAINING 2017-22 WITH THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Fire Board approve and execute a contract renewal for Trimester Use of Force Training 2017-22 with the San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department. Staff also recommends the Fire Board grant the City Manager signing authority for the subsequent renewal of the Trimester Use of Force Training (UOF) Agreement without further Fire Board Approval. BACKGROUND: On November 4, 2015, the Fire Board approved the first two years of the Trimester Use of Force Training for the District's Captain Specialists/Arson Investigators. This contract provides an initial Use of Force Orientation session for personnel entering the program for the first time and Trimester Use of Force training in accordance with the San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department Use of Force and Training Qualifications Program to the District's Captain Specialists/Arson Investigators. The Fire District investigates and determines cause and origin of fires within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The authority to investigate is set forth in California Fire Code, Section 104.10, which states, "The fire code official, the fire department, or other responsible authority shall have the authority to investigate the cause, origin, and circumstances of any fire, explosion or other hazardous condition." This includes, but is not limited to, all aspects related to interviewing, interrogation, arrest, and filing the case with the District Attorney in accordance with NFPA 921. The Fire District's Captain Specialist/Arson Investigators are classified as Peace Officers, in accordance with Penal Code 830.37(a) and 830.37(b) which refers to law enforcement officers assigned to duties as an arson (fire) investigator. In their role as Captain Specialist/Arson Investigators, our members come into contact with subjects who may pose a physical threat. The crime of arson is a felony, which carries penalties, including the possibility of multiple years of imprisonment. This contact with arson suspects increases the possibility of a Captain Specialist/Arson Investigators being required to apply force, either to detain and arrest a suspect, or to prevent the suspect from harming the investigator or member of the public. As the Fire District's Arson Investigation Program works directly with the San Bernardino County Sheriff's Arson/Bomb Division; executing this contract will provide the necessary training required of our personnel and enhance our long standing partnership. Page 1 of 2 CONTRACT RENEWAL FOR TRIMESTER USE OF FORCE TRAINING 2017-22 P33 JULY 19, 2017 ANALYSIS: Through this agreement our personnel will continue to receive the required Use of Force training. This training has been instrumental in the growth development of our Captain Specialist/Arson Investigators proficiencies related to Use of Force. In addition, this required continuing education serves as a risk management tool, providing our personnel with the latest professional updates and laws related to this subject. FISCAL IMPACT: Per Schedule A of the fee schedule, the Use of Force Orientation is $580.00 per session and the Trimester Use of Force Training is $150.00 per participant. Note that these rates are for fiscal year 2017-18 and may be adjusted each fiscal year. Funds are budgeted for the Trimester Use of Force Training in FY2017/18 in Fire Fund Personnel Development Ops/Investigator Training Account No. 3281510-5102. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: PUBLIC SAFETY This required training will enhance public safety and the safety of our personnel, should reasonable force be required to defend from, detain or arrest a person that has committed a public offense. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 — Trimester Use of Force Training & Instructional Updated Course 2017-22 Contract Page 2 of 2 Ll FOR COUNTY USE ONLY P34 THIS Agreement is entered into in the State of California by and between the County of San Bernardino, hereinafter called the COUNTY, and Name City of Rancho Cucamonga/Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Address 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Telephone Federal ID No. or Social Security No (909) 477-2770 93-1004532 IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS: hereinafter called CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT FOR TRIMESTER USE OF FORCE TRAINING WHEREAS, the COUNTY, through the Sheriffs Department, hereinafter referred to SHERIFF, conducts Trimester Use of Force (UOF) training classes for law enforcement personnel (peace officers/arson investigators); AND WHEREAS, the CONTRACTOR desires to enter into an Agreement for the participation of its peace officers/arson investigators in said classes; NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows: A. SCOPE OF SERVICES A.1 COUNTY shall provide Trimester Use of Force training to CONTRACTOR's peace officers/arson investigators in accordance with the San Bernardino County Sheriff Department's Use of Force Training and Qualifications Program. Said training shall be conducted in accordance with guidelines established in the official program manual, a copy of which shall be furnished to CONTRACTOR prior to the commencement of services hereunder. Additionally, a copy of said guidelines shall be maintained by COUNTY for review by any interested third party. ATTACHMENT 1 Page New FAS Vendor Code Dept. Contract Number Change ^ SC SHR A El Cancel ePro Vendor Number ePro Contract Number SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY County Department Dept. Orgn. Contractor's License No. Sheriff/Coroner/Public Administrator SHR SHR County Department Contract Representative Telephone Total Contract Amount F A S Samuel Fisk, Captain (909) 387-0640 TANDARD CONTRACT Contract Type evenue 171 Encumbered 171 Unencumbered Other: If not encumbered or revenue contract type, provide reason: Commodity Code Contract Start Date Contract End Date Original Amount Amendment Amount MM/DD/YY 06/30/22 $ Fund Dept. Organization Appr. Obj/Rev Source GRC/PROJ/JOB No Amount AAA SHR SCB 9800 $ Fund Dept. Organization Appr. Obj/Rev Source GRC/PROJ/JOB No. Amount Fund Dept. Organization Appr. Obj/Rev Source GRC/PROJ/JOB No. Amount Project Name Estimated Payment Total by Fiscal Year Trimester Use of Force Training FY Amount I/D FY Amount I/D 2017-22 Template — Local Agencies P34 THIS Agreement is entered into in the State of California by and between the County of San Bernardino, hereinafter called the COUNTY, and Name City of Rancho Cucamonga/Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Address 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Telephone Federal ID No. or Social Security No (909) 477-2770 93-1004532 IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS: hereinafter called CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT FOR TRIMESTER USE OF FORCE TRAINING WHEREAS, the COUNTY, through the Sheriffs Department, hereinafter referred to SHERIFF, conducts Trimester Use of Force (UOF) training classes for law enforcement personnel (peace officers/arson investigators); AND WHEREAS, the CONTRACTOR desires to enter into an Agreement for the participation of its peace officers/arson investigators in said classes; NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows: A. SCOPE OF SERVICES A.1 COUNTY shall provide Trimester Use of Force training to CONTRACTOR's peace officers/arson investigators in accordance with the San Bernardino County Sheriff Department's Use of Force Training and Qualifications Program. Said training shall be conducted in accordance with guidelines established in the official program manual, a copy of which shall be furnished to CONTRACTOR prior to the commencement of services hereunder. Additionally, a copy of said guidelines shall be maintained by COUNTY for review by any interested third party. ATTACHMENT 1 Page P35 A.2 COUNTY shall provide a four-hour Use of Force orientation session to CONTRACTOR's peace officers/arson investigators, mandatory for all agency personnel entering the program for the first time, designed to prepare individuals for ongoing Trimester Use of Force training. COUNTY's Force Options Training Staff shall assess incoming participants as to the necessity of orientation session prior to scheduling ongoing training and for any additional training, as required, for identified deficiencies. A.3 COUNTY shall provide a Safety Officer who shall coordinate with CONTRACTOR to ensure the proper use of the COUNTY's facilities and communicate identified orientation needs. A.4 The Sheriffs Department Safety Officer shall be in complete charge and control of all activities during all training sessions. A.4.1 All participants shall conduct themselves in accordance with the San Bernardino County Frank Bland Regional Training Center Range Rules and Regulations which will be presented to the participants prior to the commencement of service hereunder. A.4.2 Violations of rules and regulations may result in immediate termination of participants' rights to further training under this Agreement. A.5 It shall be the sole responsibility of the CONTRACTOR to ensure that all students arrive for all training sessions. B. TERM AND TERMINATION The term of this Agreement shall be for a period commencing on July 1, 2017, or upon the date of approval by the SHERIFF, whichever is later, and ending on June 30, 2022. Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Agreement may be terminated at any time, with or without cause, by CONTRACTOR or by COUNTY, upon written notice given to the other party at least thirty (30) days prior to the date specified for said termination. In the event of such termination, each party shall fully pay and discharge all obligations in favor of the other, accruing prior to the date of such termination, and each party shall be released from all obligations or performance which would otherwise accrue subsequent to the date of termination. Notwithstanding the foregoing, COUNTY may terminate this Agreement at any time, without advance notice to CONTRACTOR, in the event CONTRACTOR fails to comply with any term of this Agreement. C. FISCAL PROVISIONS CA CONTRACTOR shall compensate the COUNTY at the charges set forth and attached hereto as Schedule A. CONTRACTOR will be billed in arrears when the orientation session and/or trimester Use of Force training has been completed. CONTRACTOR shall submit payment to the Sheriffs Training Center for the costs billed within forty-five (45) days of invoice. C.2 Schedule A reflects the rates in effect at the execution of this agreement. COUNTY shall have the right to adjust the rates provided under this Agreement at the end of each fiscal year for the ensuing fiscal year. Any subsequent cost change(s) shall become effective on July 1 of the County fiscal year (July 1 through June 30). Such rate change(s) is effected by Memorandum of Understanding changes approved by the County Board of Supervisors. SHERIFF shall provide notice to CONTRACTOR of pending rate change(s) by providing CONTRACTOR with a revised Schedule A reflecting such rate change(s). C.3 CANCELLATION POLICY: CONTRACTOR agrees to pay the full cost of any scheduled facility session according to the Schedule B charges for the specific time booked unless the reserved time has been cancelled, at a minimum, twenty-four (24) hours prior to the scheduled session time. CONTRACTOR may cancel scheduled session by calling the SHERIFF's Range office at (909) 473-2549 or by e-mail. D. INDEMNIFICATION AND INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS D.1 Indemnification The CONTRACTOR agrees to indemnify, defend (with counsel reasonably approved by County) and hold harmless the County and its authorized officers, employees, agents and volunteers ("Indemnitees") from any and all direct claims, actions, losses, damages and/or liability arising out of Page 2 of 6 P36 this Agreement from any cause whatsoever, including the acts, errors or omissions of any person and for any costs or expenses incurred by the County on account of any claim except where such indemnification is prohibited by law. This indemnification provision shall apply regardless of the existence or degree of fault of Indemnitees. The CONTRACTOR indemnification obligation does not apply to the County's "sole negligence" or "willful misconduct" within the meaning of Civil Code section 2782. Provided, however, that this indemnity does not extend to any environmental hazards or risks. D.2 Additional Insured All policies, except for Worker's Compensation, Errors and Omissions, and Professional Liability policies, shall contain endorsements naming the COUNTY and its officers, employees, agents, and volunteers as additional named insureds with respect to liabilities arising out of the performance of services hereunder. The additional insured endorsements shall not limit the scope of coverage for the COUNTY to vicarious liability but shall allow coverage for the COUNTY to the full extent provided by the policy. Such additional insured coverage shall be at least as broad as Additional Insured (Form B) endorsement form ISO, CG 2010.11 85. D.3 Waiver of Subrogation Rights CONTRACTOR shall require the carriers of the above required coverages to waive all rights of subrogation against the COUNTY, its officers, employees, agents, volunteers, contractors, and subcontractors. All general or auto liability insurance coverage provided shall not prohibit the CONTRACTOR and CONTRACTOR's employees or agents from waiving the right of subrogation prior to a loss or claim. The CONTRACTOR hereby waives all rights of subrogation against the COUNTY. D.4 Policies Primary and Non -Contributory All policies required above are to be primary and non-contributory with any insurance or self-insurance programs carried or administered by the COUNTY. D.5 Severability of Interests The CONTRACTOR agrees to ensure that coverage provided to meet these requirements is applicable separately to each insured and there will be no cross liability exclusions that preclude coverage for suits between the CONTRACTOR and the COUNTY or between the COUNTY and any other insured or additional insured under the policy. D.6 Proof of Coverage CONTRACTOR shall furnish Certificates of Insurance to the Sheriffs Department to the address referenced in Paragraph F. or third -party contractor working on behalf of the COUNTY, evidencing the insurance coverage, including endorsements, as required, prior to the commencement of performance of services hereunder, which certificates shall provide that such insurance shall not be terminated or expire without thirty (30) days written notice to the Department, and CONTRACTOR shall maintain such insurance from the time CONTRACTOR commences performance of services hereunder until the completion of such services. Within fifteen (15) days of the commencement of the Agreement, the CONTRACTOR shall furnish a copy of the Declaration page for all applicable policies and will provide complete certified copies of the polices and endorsements immediately upon request. D.7 Acceptability of Insurance Carrier Unless otherwise approved by Risk Management, insurance shall be written by insurers authorized to do business in the State of California and with a minimum "Best" Insurance Guide rating of "A -VII". D.8 Deductibles and Self -Insured Retention Any and all deductibles or self-insured retentions in excess of $10,000 shall be declared to and approved by Risk Management. D.9 Failure to Procure Coverage In the event that any policy of insurance required under this Agreement does not comply with the requirements, is not procured, or is canceled and not replaced, the COUNTY has the right but not the Page 3 of 6 P37 obligation or duty to cancel the Agreement or obtain insurance if it deems necessary and any premiums paid by the COUNTY will be promptly reimbursed by the CONTRACTOR or COUNTY payments to the CONTRACTOR will be reduced to pay for COUNTY purchased insurance. D.10 Insurance Review Insurance requirements are subject to periodic review by the COUNTY. The Direction of Risk Management or designee is authorized, but not required, to reduce, waive or suspend any insurance requirements whenever Risk Management determines that any of the required insurance is not available, is unreasonably priced, or is not needed to protect the interests of the COUNTY. In addition, if the Department of Risk Management determines that heretofore unreasonably priced or unavailable types of insurance coverage or coverage limits become reasonably priced or available, the Director of Risk Management or designee is authorized, but not required, to change the above insurance requirements to require additional types of insurance coverage or higher coverage limits, provided that any such change is reasonable in light of past claims against the COUNTY, inflation, or any other item reasonably related to the COUNTY's risk. Any change requiring additional types of insurance coverage or higher coverage limits must be made by amendment to this Agreement. CONTRACTOR agrees to execute any such amendment within thirty (30) days of receipt. Any failure, actual or alleged, on the part of the COUNTY to monitor or enforce compliance with any of the insurance and indemnification requirements will not be deemed as a waiver of any rights on the part of the COUNTY. D.11 The CONTRACTOR agrees to provide insurance set forth in accordance with the requirements herein. If the CONTRACTOR uses existing coverage to comply with these requirements and that coverage does not meet the specified requirements, the CONTRACTOR agrees to amend, supplement or endorse the existing coverage to do so. The type(s) of insurance required is determined by the scope of the contract services. For contractors which are considered self-insured public entities: Both CONTRACTOR and COUNTY are authorized self-insured public entities for purposes of Professional Liability, General Liability, Automobile Liability, and Workers' Compensation. CONTRACTOR and COUNTY warrant that through their respective program of self-insurance, they have adequate coverage or resources to protect against liabilities arising out of the performance of the terms, conditions or obligations of this agreement. For contractors which are not considered self-insured public entities: Without in anyway affecting the indemnity herein provided and in addition thereto, the CONTRACTOR shall secure and maintain throughout the Agreement the following types of insurance with limits as shown: DA 1.1 Workers' Compensation Liability - A program of Workers' Compensation insurance or a state - approved self-insurance program in an amount and form to meet all applicable requirements of the Labor Code of the State of California, including Employer's Liability with $250,000 limits, covering all persons including volunteers providing services on behalf of the CONTRACTOR and all risks to such persons under this Agreement. D.11.2 Commercial/General Liability Insurance - The CONTRACTOR shall carry General Liability Insurance covering all operations performed by or on behalf of the Contractor providing coverage for bodily injury and property damage with a combined single limit of not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000), per occurrence. The policy coverage shall include: a. Premises operations and mobile equipment. b. Products and completed operations. C. Broad form property damage (including completed operations). d. Explosion, collapse and underground hazards. e. Personal injury. f. Contractual liability. Page 4 of 6 P38 g. $2,000,000 general aggregate limit. D.11.3 Automobile Liability Insurance -Primary insurance coverage shall be written on ISO Business Auto coverage form for all owned, hired and non -owned automobiles or symbol 1 (any auto). The policy shall have a combined single limit of not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) for bodily injury and property damage, per occurrence. If the Contractor is transporting one or more non-employee passengers in performance of contract services, the automobile liability policy shall have a combined single limit of two million dollars ($2,000,000) for bodily injury and property damage per occurrence. If the Contractor owns no autos, a non -owned auto endorsement to the General Liability policy described above is acceptable. D.11.4 Umbrella Liability Insurance - An umbrella (over primary) or excess policy may be used to comply with limits or other primary coverage requirements. When used, the umbrella policy shall apply to bodily injury/property damage, personal injury/advertising injury and shall include a "dropdown" provision providing primary coverage for any liability not covered by the primary policy. The coverage shall also apply to automobile liability. D.12 Any such reduction or waiver for the entire term of the agreement and any change requiring additional types of insurance coverage or higher coverage limits must be made by amendment to this agreement. CONTRACTOR agrees to execute any such amendment within thirty (30) days of receipt. E. RIGHT TO MONITOR AND AUDIT E.1 The County, State and Federal government shall have absolute right to review and audit all records, books, papers, documents, corporate minutes, and other pertinent items as requested, and shall have absolute right to monitor the performance of CONTRACTOR in the delivery of services provided under this Agreement. CONTRACTOR shall give full cooperation, in any auditing or monitoring conducted. CONTRACTOR shall cooperate with the COUNTY in the implementation, monitoring, and evaluation of this Agreement and comply with any and all reporting requirements established by the COUNTY. E.2 All records pertaining to services delivered and all fiscal, statistical and management books and records shall be available for examination and audit by COUNTY representatives for a period of three years after final payment under this Agreement or until all pending County, State and Federal audits are completed, whichever is later. F. NOTICES All written notices provided for in this Agreement or which either party desires to give to the other shall be deemed fully given, when made in writing and either served personally, or by facsimile, or deposited in the United States mail, postage prepaid, and addressed to the other party as follows: San Bernardino County Sheriffs Department City of Rancho Cucamonga/ Bureau of Administration 010 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District P.O. Box 569 10500 Civic Center Drive San Bernardino, CA 92402-0569 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Fax: (909) 387-3444 Notice shall be deemed communicated two (2) County working days from the time of mailing if mailed as provided in this paragraph. G. AUTHORITY The SHERIFF of San Bernardino County shall have the right to exercise the COUNTY's authority under this Agreement including the right to give notice of termination on behalf of the COUNTY at his sole discretion. Page 5 of 6 P39 H. AGREEMENT AUTHORIZATION The CONTRACTOR warrants and represents that the individual signing this Agreement is a properly authorized representative of the CONTRACTOR and has the full power and authority to enter into this Agreement on the CONTRACTOR's behalf. ENTIRE AGREEMENT This Agreement, consisting of six (6) pages and Schedule A, is attached hereto and incorporated by reference, represents the final, complete and exclusive agreement between the parties hereto. Any prior agreement, promises, negotiations or representations relating to the subject matter of this Agreement not expressly set forth herein are of no force or effect. This Agreement is executed without reliance upon any promise, warranty or representation by any party or any representative of any party other than those expressly contained herein. In Witness Whereof, the parties have duly executed and delivered this Agreement on the Execution Date. City of Rancho Cucamonga/ Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Contractor Authorized Signature Name of person signing Agreement (print or type) Title Date San Bernardino County Sheriffs Department Sheriff -Coroner Authorized Signature Name of person signing Agreement (print or type) Title Date Page 6 of 6 P40 SCHEDULE A SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT USE OF FORCE TRAINING FEE SCHEDULE 2017-22 * TRAINING DESCRIPTION FEE Use of Force Orientation Session $580 Per Session Trimester Use of Force Training $150 Per Participant * The rates on this page are for the fiscal year 2017-18 only and may be adjusted each fiscal year. Page 1 of 1 P41 STAFF REPORT DATE: July 19, 2017 TO: President and Members of the Board of Directors FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Mike Costello, Fire Chief IV4/ Don Cloughesy, Deputy Fire Chief Pamela Pane, Management Analyst III SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF AN INCREASE TO HMC ARCHITECTS CONTRACT NO. FD13-019 AND APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT NO. 004 FOR ADDITIONAL CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION SERVICES FOR THE FIRE DISTRICT ALL-RISK TRAINING CENTER AND APPROVAL OF AN APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Fire Board approve an increase to HMC Architects Contract No. FD13- 019, approve Amendment No. 004 for Additional Construction Administration Services for the Fire District All -Risk Training Center project, and approve the necessary appropriation of funds. BACKGROUND: Original bids opened on February 16, 2016, for the District's All -Risk Training Center construction project. The bids were well above the original construction cost estimates. On March 2, 2016, the Fire Board rejected all bids received. The project was refined, redesigned and re -bid. That bid process culminated in two increments for the construction. Increment I and Increment II contractors are working concurrently, but the addition of another contractor has led to an extended construction schedule. ANALYSIS: The District requests the additional Construction Administration Services of HMC Architects to help adhere to the extended construction schedule and to help expedite contractor coordination and questions in the field on the construction site. Amendment No. 004 would extend the current services, provided by HMC, through March 16, 2018. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds were not budgeted for this additional work in FY2017/18. Staff requests approval of an appropriation in the amount of $49,090 ($44,625 plus a 10% contingency) from Fire District Reserves into Fire Protection Capital Fund/Capital Project/Training Facility/Design Account No. 3288501-5650/1735288-6311. Page 1 of 2 INCREASE TO HMC ARCHITECTS CONTRACT NO. FD13-019 AND APPROVAL OF P42 AMENDMENT NO. 004 JULY 19, 2017 COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: PUBLIC SAFETY Staying in line with the Fire District's goal of providing "Premier Service," the regional All -Risk Training Center will maximize current and future skills/capabilities of not only Rancho Cucamonga Fire District personnel, but also our Rancho Sheriff, City Personnel and other public safety organizations and regional public safety partners. The Training Center will also provide a realistic environment for our local teams of trained citizen volunteers (CERT) and offer a meeting location for public education and other civic organizations. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 — HMC Architects Contract Amendment No. 004 Page 2 of 2 P43 AMENDMENT NO. 004 to Professional Services Agreement (CO #FD 13-019) between HMC Architects (hereinafter Architect) and City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter "City") and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (hereinafter the "RCFPD") This Amendment No. 004 will serve to amend the Professional Services Agreement (hereinafter "Agreement"), CO# FD 13-019 to incorporate the following: Increase CO # FD 13-019 for the additional On-site Construction Administration Services to the original architectural design services for the Fire District All -Risk Training Center, in accordance with Architect's proposal dated June 1, 2017, attached hereto, All other Terms and Conditions of the original Agreement CO# FD 13-019, will remain in full effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties, through their respective authorized representatives, have executed this Amendment by way of signature by both parties and on the date indicated below. Please return two (2) original signed copies to the City and District no later than July 13, 2017. The City and RCFPD will process both copies for signature and provide Architect with one (1) fully executed copy of the Amendment. HMCArchitelt By: 7- 9- 17 Name Date TA &*,f - Aeoft, - Title By: rdo&.- NJArne Date City of Rancho Cucamonga By Name Date Title Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District By. -- - N ame Date Title Title (two signatures required if corporation) Last Revised.• 0912812012 Page 1 of 1 ATTACHMENT 1 P44 DATE: July 19, 2017 TO: President and Members of the Board of Directors FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: William Wittkopf, Public Works Services Director Mike Costello, Fire Chief Ty Quaintance, Facilities Superintendent SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE RENEWAL OF THE ANNUAL CONTRACT WITH EMCOR SERVICES/MESA ENERGY SYSTEMS FOR CITYWIDE HVAC&R MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR SERVICES IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $45,000. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended the Board of Directors approve Amendment No. 002 to contract CO 16-114 with EMCOR Services/Mesa Energy Systems extending the term of the contract to June 30, 2018 in an amount not to exceed $45,000 for FY 2017-2018. BACKGROUND: On April 20, 2016, City Council accepted the bids received and awarded contract CO 16-114 for Citywide HVAC&R maintenance and repairs to EMCOR Services/Mesa Energy Systems with an option to renew in one year increments by mutual consent of the contractor and Fire District. If approved, Amendment 002 to contract CO 16-114 will extend the term of the contract to June 30, 2018 with no changes to the scope of work, pricing or other terms and conditions related to Fire District facilities. ANALYSIS: EMCOR/Mesa has submitted a Letter of Intent expressing their desire to continue providing service to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District during 2017/2018 with no rate increases. EMCOR Services/Mesa Energy Systems provides great service for the Fire District and is very knowledgeable with all the Fire District's HVAC&R equipment. Staff recommends Council approve the renewal of contract 16-114 effective July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018 in the amount not to exceed $45,000. An additional $390,000 for HVAC&R maintenance and repair services for City facilities will be considered separately by the City Council. FISCAL IMPACT: The contract price is within the contract services budget line items approved in the Fire District budget for 2017/2018. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: None. ATTACHMENTS: None. Page 1 of 1 P45 REPORT DATE: July 19, 2017 TO: President and Members of the Board of Directors FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director, Noah Daniels, Finance Manager Ni> SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX LEVY FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NOS. 85-1 AND 88-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017/18 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Fire Board adopt resolutions approving the levy of special taxes for Community Facility District Nos. 85-1 and 88-1 for Fiscal Year 2017/18. BACKGROUND: Pursuant to the Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (the "1982 Act"), the City Council approved the issuance of bonds to financing public facilities within certain geographical boundaries which formed the aforementioned Community Facility Districts (each a "District" and collectively, the "Districts"). Annually, prior to the County's direct assessment enrollment deadline in August, the Fire Board will be asked to adopt a resolution approving the levy of special tax as reflected in the respective Annual Status Report for each district. Accordingly, for the upcoming Fiscal Year 2017/18 levy, the Fire Board's approval is recommended prior to the August 10, 2017 submittal deadline to the County of San Bernardino, for the special taxes to be included in the upcoming tax roll. Although the Fire Board has previously authorized the formation of the Districts and the maximum levy of a special tax within the boundaries of the Districts, the actual annual special tax to be levied must be authorized on an annual basis. ANALYSIS: The annual levy of special taxes for the Districts is sufficient to pay for the public facilities and services associated with the Districts. These costs are permitted to be financed pursuant to the 1982 Act. All the costs related to the Districts are costs of the Districts, not the Fire District nor its General Fund. Thus, all costs related to administering the Districts are the responsibility of the property owners within the Districts. The annual levy of special taxes will be applied to all parcels within the Districts and will be levied and collected in perpetuity, unless and until such time the City determines that revenues Page 1 of 2 Z 1:1 FIRE BOARD STAFF REPORT CONSIDERATION TO SET SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICTS JULY 19, 2017 are no longer needed. The maximum annual special tax for the Districts will be adjusted annually by the change in the Los Angeles -Riverside -Orange Co. Consumer Price Index or the State of California, Department of Finance methodology for adjusting appropriations limits for State and Local Governments, according the District. The table below summaries the levy for each District for Fiscal Year 2017/18: Community Facility District Proposed Special Tax Levy Notes 85-1 $ 5,989,096 No change from prior year. 88-1 $ 1,229,186 No change from prior year. The special taxes noted in the Annual Status Report for each district are net of estimated delinquencies for budgetary purposes. In cases of special tax delinquency and foreclosure, the parcels will be subject to penalties. If approved, City staff will file the certified list of all parcels subject to the special tax levy with the County of San Bernardino no later than the County's August 10, 2017 submittal deadline. Adoption of the resolutions will provide for the Fiscal Year 2017/18 levy upon the parcels within the District that are not otherwise exempt from taxation, at the rates set forth in the attached Annual Status Reports for Fiscal Year 2017/18. FISCAL IMPACT: The Districts are separate from the Fire District General Fund. The special tax revenues that are collected for each district are used for the related services and administration costs for only that District. BOARD GOAL ADDRESSED: There is no Fire Board Goal addressed. The process of approving the special tax for the Districts is required by the 1982 Act. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 01 — Resolution No. FD 17-014 Attachment 02 — Annual Status Report - CFD 85-1 Attachment 03 — Resolution No. FD 17-015 Attachment 04 — Annual Status Report - CFD 88-1 Page 2 of 2 P47 RESOLUTION NO. FD 17-014 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING THE ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017/18 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, California, (formerly Foothill Fire Protection District, hereinafter referred to as the 'legislative body"), (a) initiated proceedings in 1985 to (i) form the Foothill Fire Protection District Community Facilities District No. 85-1 ("CFD No. 85-1") and (ii) authorize the levy of special taxes within CFD No. 85-1; (b) held a public hearing regarding the foregoing and formed CFD No. 85-1; and (c) conducted an election on December 10, 1985 and more than two-thirds (2/3) of the qualified electors voted in favor of a proposition authorizing the levy of special taxes in CFD No. 85-1, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982," being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California (the "Act'); and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by ordinance, as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the annual levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said CFD No. 85-1 at the rate and apportion the special tax in the manner specified in the resolution adopted pursuant to Article 2 (commencing with Section 53318 of the Government Code), except that this Board of Directors may levy the special tax at a lower rate; and WHEREAS, this Board of Directors desires to levy a special tax in the CFD No. 85-1 for the Fiscal Year 2017/18. NOW, THEREFORE, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, HEREBY RESOLVES: SECTION 1: Levy of Special Tax. That the specific rate and amount of the special tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for the Fiscal Year 2017/18 for the CFD No. 85-1 is hereby determined and established as set forth in the attached, referenced and incorporated Exhibit "A". SECTION 2: Exempt Properties. That properties or entities of the State, Federal or other local governments shall be exempt from such special tax. SECTION 3: Use of Special Tax. That the proceeds of the special tax shall be used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: (a) The construction, acquisition, expansion and/or rehabilitation of public facilities, within or for the benefit of the CFD No. 85-1 generally described as follows: Fire protection and suppression facilities and appurtenances, including equipment, real property and other tangible property with an estimated useful life of five years or longer. (b) The services to be provided within the CFD No. 85-1 are generally described as follows: The performance by employees of functions, operations and maintenance and repair activities in order to provide fire protection within the CFD No. 85-1. (c) The repayment of advances and loans. The special tax shall be used solely for the purposes specified above and for no other purpose. Resolution No. FD 17-014- Page 1 of 4 ATTACHMENT #01 P48 SECTION 4: Annual Adjustment in Maximum Special Tax. Pursuant to authorization of the qualified electorate, this Board of Directors hereby declares that it shall annually adjust the maximum special tax based upon the lesser of: (a) changes in cost of living; or (b) changes in cost of living and changes in population as defined in Section 7901 of the Government Code occurring within the CFD No. 85-1 in the immediately preceding fiscal year. (c) The maximum authorized special tax rates are set forth in the attached referenced and incorporated Exhibit "B" SECTION 5: Collection of Special Tax. The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 19th day of July, 2017. Resolution No. FD 17-014- Page 2 of 4 ATTACHMENT #01 EXHIBIT "A" SPECIAL TAX FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017/18 IN MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX STRUCTURES FISCAL YEAR 2017/18 Residential Multi -Family Residential Commercial Industrial Reduction $144.12 per DU 2 DU: 1.75 ($144.12) 3 DU: 2.25 ($144.12) 4 DU: 2.65 ($144.12) 5 - 14 DU: 2.65 ($144.12) + {.35 (TU - 4) ($144.12)} 15 - 30 DU: 6.15 ($144.12) + (.30 (TU - 14) ($144.12)} 31 - 80 DU: 10.65 ($144.12) + (.25 (TU - 30) ($144.12)} 81 - up DU: 23.15 ($144.12) + {.20 (TU - 80) ($144.12)} $144.12 per acre + $0.078 per SF $144.12 per acre + $0.095 per SF NOTE: DU = Dwelling Unit TU = Total Units SF = Square Foot Vol Commercial and industrial structures shall be granted a $0.01 reduction in the special tax for the installation of complete sprinkler systems. In addition, multi -floor commercial and industrial structures shall also be granted a $0.01 reduction (not cumulative) in special tax for each separate floor above or below the main ground floor of the structure. Resolution No. FD 17-014- Page 3 of 4 ATTACHMENT #01 EXHIBIT "B" MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX FOR MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 IN FISCAL YEAR 2017/18 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT PER CAPITA COST FISCAL YEAR MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX OF LIVING CHANGE 2016/17 BASE FISCAL YEAR 2017/18 1.0268% $159.59DU STRUCTURES Residential Multi -Family Residential Commercial Industrial Reduction $163.87 DU MAXIMUM ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FISCAL YEAR 2017/18 $163.87 per DU 2 DU: 1.75 ($163.87) 3 DU: 2.25 ($163.87) 4 DU: 2.65 ($163.87) 5 -14 DU: 2.65 ($163.87) + {.35 (TU - 4) ($163.87)} 15 - 30 DU: 6.15 ($163.87) + {.30 (TU - 14) ($163.87)} 31 - 80 DU: 10.65 ($163.87) + {.25 (TU - 30) ($163.87)1 81 - up DU: 23.15 ($163.87) + {.20 (TU - 80) ($163.87)} $163.87 per acre + $0.086 per SF $163.87 per acre + $0.105 per SF NOTE: DU = Dwelling Unit TU = Total Units SF = Square Foot P50 Commercial and industrial structures shall be granted a $0.01 reduction in the special tax for the installation of complete sprinkler systems. In addition, multi -floor commercial and industrial structures shall also be granted a $0.01 reduction (not cumulative) in special tax for each separate floor above or below the main ground floor of the structure. Resolution No. FD 17-014- Page 4 of 4 ATTACHMENT #01 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 ANNUAL STATUS REPORT JULY, 2017 ATTACHMENT 2 P51 P52 Resolution No. FD 17-014 BACKGROUND On December 10, 1985, the electors within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 85-1 (CFD No. 85-1) the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (formerly Foothill Fire Protection District, the "District") voted in favor of a proposition to authorize the levy of a special tax for fire suppression services and facilities, to establish an appropriations limit and to annually adjust the special tax and appropriations limit based upon changes in the cost of living and changes in population. CFD No. 85-1 is bounded generally on the north by the 210 Freeway, on the east by Etiwanda, on the south by 4ffi and on the west by Archibald. The maximum special tax shall be annually adjusted for the lesser of (a) changes in cost of living; or (b) changes in the cost of living and changes in population as defined in Section 7901 of the Government Code, as amended. It has been determined that there are sufficient revenues available in the CFD No. 85-1 to meet all financial obligations without an increase to the CFD No. 85-1 for Fiscal Year 2017/18. The maximum tax rate which could be levied is adjusted per the March Los Angeles -Riverside -Orange Counties Consumer Price Index. The change in the Cost of Living is 1.0268% for Fiscal Year 2017/18. Community Facilities District No. 85-1 1 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHEMENT #02 P53 Resolution No. FD 17-014 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FISCAL YEAR 2017/18 STRUCTURES ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX Residential $144.12 per DU Multi -Family 2 DU 1.75 ($144.12) Residential 3 DU 2.25 ($144.12) 4 DU 2.65 ($144.12) 5 -14 DU 2.65 ($144.12) + {.35 (TU - 15 - 30 DU 6.15 ($144.12) + {.30 (TU - 31 - 80 DU 10.65 ($144.12) + {.25 (TU - 81 - up DU 23.15 ($144.12) + {.20 (TU - Commercial $144.12 per acre + $.078 per SF Industrial $144.12 per acre + $.095 per SF NOTE: DU = Dwelling Unit TU = Total Units SF = Square Foot Reduction 4) ($144.12)} 14) ($144.12)} 30) ($144.12)} 80) ($144.12)} Commercial and industrial structures shall be granted a $0.01 reduction in the special tax for the installation of complete sprinkler systems. In addition, multi -floor commercial and industrial structures shall also be granted a $0.01 reduction (not cumulative) in special tax for each separate floor above or below the main ground floor of the structure. Community Facilities District No. 85-1 2 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHEMENT #02 P54 Resolution No. FD 17-014 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 PROPOSED SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS 2017/18 Budget Sources Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies $ 5,940,580 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 43,840 Subtotal - Taxes 5,984,420 Interest Revenue 30,140 CFD Annexations 1,800 Total Proposed Sources $ 6,032,450 Uses Communications 338,280 Fire Suppression 5,176,630 Fire Station Operations and Maintenance 97,840 Vehicle and Equipment Maintenance 167,980 Admin./General Overhead 251,720 Total Proposed Uses $ 6,032,450 Community Facilities District No. 85-1 3 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHEMENT #02 Ay UONIIIIW Ay uaAeH Ay esouLaH Ay Pleg!4oj+d Ay uewllaH 3S uellawea epuBM43 Is XeaJO Aea Ay JaisayPo?� P55 Resolution No. FD 17-014 T CO v o Ay �g4o N U U o tM JLO0 �y o J mCD C r A AV Ma :F= Ay ePuenn43 Ii Ay JaisayPoa Ay ua�IIIIW Ay uaneH Ay esouuaH AV Plegl4DJ`d Ay UeW118H Ay pjeAeui HI AV QAQJ!D t a�� )1 { MIR;}� tea"lia .41 Community Facilities District No. 85-1 4 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHEMENT #02 T Cn o: ro m d Community Facilities District No. 85-1 4 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHEMENT #02 P56 RESOLUTION NO. FD 17-015 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING THE ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017/18 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, California, (formerly Foothill Fire Protection District, hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a community facilities district, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982," being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California. This community facilities district shall hereinafter be referred to as Community Facilities District No. 88-1 (hereinafter referred to as the "CFD No. 88-1 "); and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by ordinance, as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said CFD No. 88-1, and this legislative body is desirous to establish the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the next fiscal year and to adjust the maximum special tax authorization to be levied. NOW, THEREFORE, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, HEREBY RESOLVES: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the special tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for Fiscal Year 2017/18 for the referenced CFD No. 88-1 is hereby determined and established as set forth in the attached, referenced, and incorporated Exhibit "A". SECTION 3: That the rate as set forth above does not exceed the amount as previously authorized by ordinance of this legislative body, and is not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the CFD No. 88-1. SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the special tax shall be used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: A. Payment of principal and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness, if any; B. Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds, including sinking funds; C. Payment of costs and expenses of authorized public facilities and public services, including the administration of the special tax levy; and D. Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate. The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. SECTION 5: That the maximum authorized special tax rates for all developed properties are hereby adjusted pursuant to Ordinance No. 17. The maximum authorized special tax rates are set forth in the attached, referenced, and incorporated Exhibit "B". Resolution No. FD 17-015- Page 1 of 4 ATTACHMENT 903 SECTION 6: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax. SECTION 7: All monies above collected shall be paid into the CFD No. 88-1 funds, including any bond fund and reserve fund. SECTION 8: The County Auditor is hereby directed to enter in the next County assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land affected in a space marked "public improvements," "special tax" or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special tax, and for the exact rate and amount of said tax reference is made to the attached Exhibit "A". SECTION 9: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to the Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties, and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 19'h day of July, 2017. Resolution No. FD 17-015- Page 2 of 4 ATTACHMENT #03 P57 EXHIBIT "A" RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 SPECIAL TAX LEVY FISCAL YEAR 2017/18 SF = Square Feet Resolution No. FD 17-015- Page 3 of 4 ATTACHMENT #03 P58 SPECIAL TAX LEVY SPECIAL TAX LEVY TAXING CLASSIFICATION FISCAL YEAR 2016/17 FISCAL YEAR 2017/18 1. DEVELOPED PROPERTY A. Residential Class 1 $440.08 $440.08 (more than 3,590 SF) B. Residential Class II $339.09 $339.09 (3,077 to 3,589 SF) C. Residential Class III $269.89 $269.89 (2,564 to 3,076 SF) D. Residential Class IV $235.85 $235.85 (2,308 to 2,563 SF) E. Residential Class V $204.22 $204.22 (2,051 to 2,307 SF) F. Residential Class VI $186.00 $186.00 (1,795 to 2,050 SF) G. Residential Class VII $167.75 $167.75 (less than 1,795 SF) Commercial/Industrial Property $677.13 per acre or $0.061 $677.13 per acre or $0.061 per sq. ft. of building area, per sq. ft. of building area, whichever is greater. whichever is greater. 2. APPROVED PROPERTY $200 per lot or parcel $200.00 per lot or parcel 3. VACANT PROPERTY $10.00 per acre $10.00 per acre SF = Square Feet Resolution No. FD 17-015- Page 3 of 4 ATTACHMENT #03 P58 P59 EXHIBIT "B" RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX RATES FISCAL YEAR 2017/18 DEVELOPED PROPERTY MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX RATE TAXING CLASSIFICATION FISCAL YEAR 2015/16 1. DEVELOPED PROPERTY FISCAL YEAR 2016/17 A. Residential Class 1 $1,249.35 $1,307.56 (more than 3,590 SF) B. Residential Class II $958.00 $1,002.64 (3,077 to 3,589 SF) C. Residential Class III $764.51 $800.13 (2,564 to 3,076 SF) D. Residential Class IV $670.09 $701.31 (2,308 to 2,563 SF) E. Residential Class V $573.43 $600.15 (2,051 to 2,307 SF) F. Residential Class VI $529.64 $554.32 (1,795 to 2,050 SF) G. Residential Class VII $478.29 $500.57 (less than 1,795 SF) H. Commercial/Industrial Property $1,922.88 per acre or $2,012.48 per acre or $0.15544 per sq. ft. of bldg $0.16268 per sq. ft. of bldg area, whichever is greater. area, whichever is greater. 2. APPROVED PROPERTY $200.00 per lot or parcel $200.00 per lot or parcel 3. VACANT PROPERTY $10.00 per acre $10.00 per acre SF = Square Feet NOTE: Escalation of maximum special rate. Calculation formula Fiscal Year 2017/18 Population CPI* Change Change Factor 1.0094 X 1.0369 = 1.0466 *CPI - California Per Capita Personal Income Resolution No. FD 17-015- Page 4 of 4 ATTACHMENT #03 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 ANNUAL STATUS REPORT JULY, 2017 AAtcMmed- # jv P60 P61 Resolution No. FD 17-015 BACKGROUND On April 4, 1989, the qualified voters approved the formation of Mello -Roos Community Facilities District No. 88-1 ("CFD No. 88-1") and authorized CFD No. 88-1 to annually levy a special tax to provide for fire protection services within northeast Etiwanda. On May 19, 1989, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (formerly Foothill Fire Protection District) adopted an Ordinance authorizing the CFD No. 88-1, by Resolution, to annually levy a special tax in CFD No. 88-1 for purposes of land acquisition, fire station construction, purchase of equipment, and operations and maintenance costs for fire protection services. CFD No. 88-1 is located within the boundaries of Highland, Cherry, Day Creek Channel and the San Bernardino National Forest. For Fiscal Year 2017/18, staff has determined that there are sufficient revenues available to meet all financial obligations; hence, there will be no increase in the actual assessment rate for CFD No. 88-1 for Fiscal Year 2017/18. The maximum special tax shall be annually adjusted for changes in cost of living; or changes in the cost of living and changes in population as defined in Section 7901 of the Government Code, as amended, whichever is lesser. The change in the cost of living and changes in population is 1.04660% for Fiscal Year 2017/18. Community Facilities District No. 88-1 1 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #04 Resolution No. FD 17-015 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FISCAL YEAR 2017/18 DEVELOPED APPROVED UNDEVELOPED A. Residential Class 1 B. Residential Class 2 C. Residential Class 3 D. Residential Class 4 E. Residential Class 5 F. Residential Class 6 G. Residential Class 7 H. Commercial/Industrial Community Facilities District No. 88-1 Fiscal Year 2017/18 $440.08/sfd $339.09/sfd $269.89/sfd $235.85/sfd $204.22/sfd $186.00/sfd $167.75/sfd $677.13/acre or $0.061/ sq. ft. or whichever is greater $200.00/lot or parcel $10.00/acre 2 ATTACHMENT #04 P62 P63 Resolution No. FD 17-015 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 PROPOSED SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS Sources Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection Subtotal - Taxes CFD Annexations Total Proposed Sources Uses Communications Fire Suppression Fire Station Operations and Maintenance Admin./General Overhead Total Proposed Uses 2017/18 Budget $ 1,217,140 11,350 1,228,490 560 $ 2,318,600 84,580 2,089,960 39,650 104,410 $ 2,318,600 Community Facilities District No. 88-1 3 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #04 P64 CrjUeAAq . .RC1 ,it3t521,{:�� I Cn V c Resolution No. FD 17-015 a� E CO O Uo Ay kJa40 d U .aJ tM LO CD o c CU■m ¢C if Cl) c S J C M l3 � t et T j Ay Ja;S2WON 'Ay uaN!II!W Community Facilities District No. 88-1 4 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #04 Ay uaneH Ay esoWJaH 1 ..- --- -- {AV PIe4!4aIb — r• Ay ueWlIGH Ay Pie�tau!A y j 1 �.l m r .. AVOAQJ� � fn � s eai1�� Community Facilities District No. 88-1 4 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #04 REPORT DATE: July 19, 2017 TO: President and Members of the Board of Directors FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Darryl Polk, CIO/ DoIT Director v". SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL TO AUTHORIZE A MULTI-YEAR AGREEMENT FOR CISCO SMARTNET SERVICES AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE BID PROCESS TO BE COMPLETED JULY 17, 2017 AND FOR AUTHORIZATION TO APPROPRIATE ADDITIONAL FUNDS FROM THE COMPUTER EQUIPMENT AND TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT FUND RESERVES. As of this writing, staff is conducting the bid process for a multi-year agreement for Cisco SmartNet network support services and will have a finalized report with recommended bid awards distributed to the Council as soon as possible prior to the Council meeting. Staff will also be requesting an appropriation of funds in an amount not to exceed $161,000 to account No. 3288501-5300 (Contract Services). Page 1 of 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P66 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 6/13/2017 through 7/10/2017 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Cltv Fire Amount AP 00007110 06/14/2017 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC. 68,350.14 0.00 68,350.14 AP 00007111 06/14/2017 MICHAEL, L. DENNIS 946.11 0.00 946.11 AP 00007112 06/14/2017 POWEREX CORP 1,988.78 0.00 1,988.78 AP 00007113 06/21/2017 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC. 12,301.88 0.00 12,301.88 AP 00007114 06/21/2017 CALIF GOVERNMENT VEBA/RANCHO CUCAMONGA 11,420.00 0.00 11,420.00 AP 00007115 06/21/2017 NEW HORIZONS CLC OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 2,040.00 0.00 2,040.00 AP 00007116 06/21/2017 NORMAN A TRAUB ASSOCIATES 4,197.30 0.00 4,197.30 AP 00007117 06/21/2017 RCCEA 1,784.50 0.00 1,784.50 AP 00007118 06/21/2017 RCPFA 11,512.37 0.00 11,512.37 AP 00007119 06/21/2017 RE ASTORIA 2 LLC 79,576.18 0.00 79,576.18 AP 00007120 06/27/2017 AHUMADA, ALEXANDER R 0.00 651.52 651.52 AP 00007121 06/27/2017 ALMAND, LLOYD 0.00 651.52 651.52 AP 00007122 06/27/2017 BANTAU, VICTORIA 0.00 651.52 651.52 AP 00007123 06/27/2017 BAZAL, SUSAN 0.00 1,020.45 1,020.45 AP 00007124 06/27/2017 BELL, MICHAEL L. 0.00 1,303.76 1,303.76 AP 00007125 06/27/2017 BERRY, DAVID 0.00 1,019.78 1,019.78 AP 00007126 06/27/2017 BROCK, ROBIN 0.00 977.64 977.64 AP 00007127 06/27/2017 CAMPBELL, GERALD 0.00 746.37 746.37 AP 00007128 06/27/2017 CAMPBELL, STEVEN 0.00 1,407.17 1,407.17 AP 00007129 06/27/2017 CARNES, KENNETH 0.00 472.96 472.96 AP 00007130 06/27/2017 CLABBY, RICHARD 0.00 1,019.78 1,019.78 AP 00007131 06/27/2017 CORCORAN, ROBERT 0.00 587.88 587.88 AP 00007132 06/27/2017 COX, KARL 0.00 651.52 651.52 AP 00007133 06/27/2017 CRANE, RALPH 0.00 1,020.45 1,020.45 AP 00007134 06/27/2017 CROSSLAND, WILBUR 0.00 472.96 472.96 AP 00007135 06/27/2017 DAGUE, JAMES 0.00 1,303.76 1,303.76 AP 00007136 06/27/2017 DE ANTONIO, SUSAN 0.00 587.88 587.88 AP 00007137 06/27/2017 DEANS, JACKIE 0.00 630.69 630.69 AP 00007138 06/27/2017 DOMINICK, SAMUEL A. 0.00 977.64 977.64 AP 00007139 06/27/2017 EAGLESON, MICHAEL 0.00 1,303.76 1,303.76 AP 00007140 06/27/2017 EGGERS, BOB 0.00 1,733.29 1,733.29 AP 00007141 06/27/2017 FRITCHEY, JOHN D. 0.00 472.96 472.96 AP 00007142 06/27/2017 HEYDE, DONALD 0.00 1,303.76 1,303.76 AP 00007143 06/27/2017 INTERLICCHIA, ROSALYN 0.00 587.88 587.88 AP 00007144 06/27/2017 KILMER, STEPHEN 0.00 1,364.11 1,364.11 AP 00007145 06/27/2017 LANE, WILLIAM 0.00 1,303.76 1,303.76 AP 00007146 06/27/2017 LEE, ALLAN J. 0.00 1,300.86 1,300.86 AP 00007147 06/27/2017 LENZE, PAUL E 0.00 1,223.96 1,223.96 AP 00007148 06/27/2017 LONGO, JOE 0.00 172.48 172.48 AP 00007149 06/27/2017 LUTTRULL, DARRELL 0.00 472.96 472.96 AP 00007150 06/27/2017 MACKALL, BEVERLY 0.00 445.89 AP 00007151 06/27/2017 MAYFIELD, RON 0.00 445.89 AP 00007152 06/27/2017 MCKEE, JOHN 1,389.38 1,389.38 AP 00007153 06/27/2017 MCNEIL, KENNETH 0.00 651.52 651.52 AP 00007154 06/27/2017 MICHAEL, L. DENNIS 0.00 651.52 651.52 AP 00007155 06/27/2017 MORGAN, BYRON 0.00 977.64 977.64 AP 00007156 06/27/2017 MYSKOW, DENNIS 0.00 2,317.74 2,317.74 0.00 1,019.78 1,019.78 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: I Report: CK -AGENDA -REG -PORTRAIT -CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Current Date: 07/11/2017 I Time: 15:32:57 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P67 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 6/13/2017 through 7/10/2017 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name 9!1 Fire Amount AP 00007157 06/27/2017 NAUMAN, MICHAEL 0.00 472.96 472.96 AP 00007158 06/27/2017 NEE, RON 0.00 630.69 630.69 AP 00007159 06/27/2017 NELSON, MARY JANE 0.00 172.48 172.48 AP 00007160 06/27/2017 O'BRIEN, TOM 0.00 1,733.29 1,733.29 AP 00007161 06/27/2017 PLOUNG, MICHAEL J 0.00 579.26 579.26 AP 00007162 06/27/2017 POST, MICHAEL R 0.00 1,628.59 1,628.59 AP 00007163 06/27/2017 PROULX, PATRICK 0.00 1,733.29 1,733.29 AP 00007164 06/27/2017 ROEDER, JEFF 0.00 1,303.76 1,303.76 AP 00007165 06/27/2017 SALISBURY, THOMAS 0.00 651.52 651.52 AP 00007166 06/27/2017 SMITH, RONALD 0.00 472.96 472.96 AP 00007167 06/27/2017 SPAGNOLO, SAM 0.00 472.96 472.96 AP 00007168 06/27/2017 SPAIN, WILLIAM 0.00 746.37 746.37 AP 00007169 06/27/2017 SULLIVAN, JAMES 0.00 472.96 472.96 AP 00007170 06/27/2017 TAYLOR, STEVE 0.00 1,629.55 1,629.55 AP 00007171 06/27/2017 TULEY, TERRY 0.00 1,303.76 1,303.76 AP 00007172 06/27/2017 VANDERKALLEN, FRANCIS 0.00 1,064.00 1,064.00 AP 00007173 06/27/2017 WALTON, KEVIN 0.00 1,364.11 1,364.11 AP 00007174 06/27/2017 YOWELL, TIMOTHY A 0.00 1,389.38 1,389.38 AP 00007175 06/28/2017 CALIF GOVERNMENT VEBA/RANCHO CUCAMONGA 21,264.72 0.00 21,264.72 AP 00007176 06/28/2017 CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HS DISTRICT 1,798.08 0.00 1,798.08 AP 00007177 06/28/2017 EMPIRE COACH ROYAL LLC 7,945.00 0.00 7,945.00 AP 00007178 06/28/2017 RCPFA 31.14 0.00 31.14 AP 00007179 07/05/2017 HD PRODUCTIONS INC 6,250.00 0.00 6,250.00 AP 00007180 07/05/2017 LANDCARE USA LLC 11,948.89 0.00 11,948.89 AP 00007181 07/05/2017 CALIF GOVERNMENT VEBA/RANCHO CUCAMONGA 11,495.00 0.00 11,495.00 AP 00007182 07/05/2017 RCCEA 1,766.50 0.00 1,766.50 AP 00007183 07/05/2017 RCPFA 11,433.19 0.00 11,433.19 AP 00380719 06/14/2017 IUP GRAPHICS 0.00 60.49 60.49 AP 00380720 06/14/2017 A & M FIRST AID INC 2,252.62 0.00 2,252.62 AP 00380721 06/14/2017 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 99.80 0.00 99.80 AP 00380722 06/14/2017 ABLE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 39,330.81 0.00 39,330.81 AP 00380723 06/14/2017 ACTION AWARDS INC. 1,224.07 0.00 1,224.07 AP 00380724 06/14/2017 ADAMSON INDUSTRIES 187.35 0.00 187.35 AP 00380725 06/14/2017 AFLAC GROUP INSURANCE 10,433.79 0.00 10,433.79 AP 00380726 06/14/2017 AFLAC GROUP INSURANCE 6,955.86 0.00 6,955.86 AP 00380727 06/14/2017 AIR EXCHANGE INC 0.00 4,189.32 4,189.32 AP 00380728 06/14/2017 ALL WELDING 4,174.24 0.00 4,174.24 AP 00380729 06/14/2017 ALLIED UNIVERSAL SECURITY SERVICES 12,615.36 0.00 12,615.36 AP 00380730 06/14/2017 AMERICAN REGISTRY FOR INTERNET NUMBERS LTD 100.00 0.00 100.00 AP 00380731 06/14/2017 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 760.00 0.00 760.00 AP 00380732 06/14/2017 ARCHIBALD PET HOSPITAL 100.00 0.00 100.00 AP 00380733 06/14/2017 ART OF LIVING FOUNDATION 90.00 0.00 90.00 AP 00380734 06/14/2017 AT&T MOBILITY 0.00 84.00 84.00 AP 00380735 06/14/2017 AUFBAU CORPORATION 940.00 0.00 940.00 AP 00380736 06/14/2017 AUNTIE M CREATIVE CONSULTANTS INC. 3,676.76 0.00 3,676.76 AP 00380737 06/14/2017 BAILEY, LEKISHA 5.20 0.00 5.20 AP 00380738 06/14/2017 BARNES AND NOBLE 583.98 0.00 583.98 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 2 Current Date: 07/11/2017 Report: CK -AGENDA -REG -PORTRAIT -CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 15:32:57 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA pgg AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 6/13/2017 through 7/10/2017 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Citv Fire Amount AP 00380739 06/14/2017 BARR & CLARK INC. 375.00 0.00 375.00 AP 00380740 06/14/2017 BASELINE ANIMAL HOSPITAL 200.00 0.00 200.00 AP 00380741 06/14/2017 BAUGHMAN, LOGAN 44.50 0.00 44.50 AP 00380742 06/14/2017 BELTRAN, OSBALDO ALVARADO 540.00 0.00 540.00 AP 00380743 06/14/2017 BRODZINSKI, JONNY 11.84 0.00 11.84 AP 00380744 06/14/2017 BUTSKO UTILITY DESIGN INC. 4,408.92 0.00 4,408.92 AP 00380747 06/14/2017 C V W D 53,135.12 448.27 53,583.39 *** AP 00380748 06/14/2017 C.P. GENERATOR INC. 51.72 0.00 51.72 AP 00380749 06/14/2017 CAL PERS LONG TERM CARE 286.21 0.00 286.21 AP 00380750 06/14/2017 CAPITAL ONE COMMERCIAL 1,396.40 45.25 1,441.65 *** AP 00380751 06/14/2017 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 0.00 167.23 167.23 AP 00380752 06/14/2017 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 4,263.26 0.00 4,263.26 AP 00380753 06/14/2017 CHUNXIA, JIANG 52.76 0.00 52.76 AP 00380754 06/14/2017 CINTAS CORPORATION #150 1,471.26 93.45 1,564.71 *** AP 00380755 06/14/2017 CLASSE PARTY RENTALS 835.80 0.00 835.80 AP 00380756 06/14/2017 CLIMATEC LLC 888.78 0.00 888.78 AP 00380757 06/14/2017 CONVERGEONE INC. 46,191.31 0.00 46,191.31 AP 00380758 06/14/2017 COPPER CANYON BAND 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00380759 06/14/2017 CORELOGIC SOLUTIONS LLC 250.00 0.00 250.00 AP 00380760 06/14/2017 CREATIVE BRAIN LEARNING 1,386.00 0.00 1,386.00 AP 00380761 06/14/2017 D & D SERVICES INC. 430.00 0.00 430.00 AP 00380762 06/14/2017 DAWSON SURVEYING INC. 16,000.00 0.00 16,000.00 AP 00380763 06/14/2017 DELTA DENTAL 1,361.00 0.00 1,361.00 AP 00380764 06/14/2017 DELTA DENTAL 41,248.10 0.00 41,248.10 AP 00380765 06/14/2017 DUMBELL MAN FITNESS EQUIPMENT, THE 0.00 241.98 241.98 AP 00380766 06/14/2017 ENVIRONMENTAL RECOVERY SERVICES INC. 3,500.21 0.00 3,500.21 AP 00380767 06/14/2017 EREDIA, PATRICIA MORGAN 243.00 0.00 243.00 AP 00380768 06/14/2017 ERICKSON HALL CONSTRUCTION 0.00 112,411.41 112,411.41 AP 00380769 06/14/2017 EXPERIAN 52.00 0.00 52.00 AP 00380770 06/14/2017 EXPRESS BRAKE SUPPLY 64.64 0.00 64.64 AP 00380771 06/14/2017 FAIRVIEW FORD 368.09 0.00 368.09 AP 00380772 06/14/2017 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 229.14 0.00 229.14 AP 00380773 06/14/2017 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 19.43 0.00 19.43 AP 00380774 06/14/2017 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 175.16 0.00 175.16 AP 00380775 06/14/2017 FERRER, GABRIEL 0.00 261.00 261.00 AP 00380776 06/14/2017 FIRST CLASS HEATING & AIR 1,700.00 0.00 1,700.00 AP 00380777 06/14/2017 FIRST CLASS HEATING & AIR 2,300.00 0.00 2,300.00 AP 00380778 06/14/2017 FLAG SYSTEMS INC. 1,550.00 0.00 1,550.00 AP 00380779 06/14/2017 FRANCO, JENNIER 825.00 0.00 825.00 AP 00380780 06/14/2017 FRONTIER COMM 1,482.56 0.00 1,482.56 AP 00380781 06/14/2017 G AND M BUSINESS INTERIORS 5,191.72 0.00 5,191.72 AP 00380782 06/14/2017 GALE/CENGAGE LEARNING 1,880.29 0.00 1,880.29 AP 00380783 06/14/2017 GALLAGHER, PATRICK 886.54 0.00 886.54 AP 00380784 06/14/2017 GATEWAY PET CEMETERY AND CREMATORY 240.00 0.00 240.00 AP 00380785 06/14/2017 GLOBALSTAR USA 339.49 0.00 339.49 AP 00380786 06/14/2017 GOOD YEAR TIRE AND RUBBER CO. 572.43 1,008.14 1,580.57 *** AP 00380787 06/14/2017 GRAINGER 43.10 742.08 785.18 *** User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 3 Current Date: 07/11/2017 Report: CK -AGENDA -REG -PORTRAIT -CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 15:32:57 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P69 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 6/13/2017 through 7/10/2017 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Li!y Fire Amount AP 00380788 06/14/2017 GRAPHICS FACTORY INC. 2,150.69 0.00 2,150.69 AP 00380789 06/14/2017 GRAVES & KING LLP 644.41 0.00 644.41 AP 00380790 06/14/2017 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO 2,051.78 0.00 2,051.78 AP 00380791 06/14/2017 HEARTSAVERS LLC 240.00 0.00 240.00 AP 00380792 06/14/2017 HEILIG, KELLY 225.00 0.00 225.00 AP 00380793 06/14/2017 HI WAY SAFETY INC 1,218.99 0.00 1,218.99 AP 00380794 06/14/2017 HILLS PET NUTRITION SALES INC 710.59 0.00 710.59 AP 00380795 06/14/2017 HMC ARCHITECTS 0.00 19,653.00 19,653.00 AP 00380796 06/14/2017 HOYT LUMBER CO., SM 0.00 24.59 24.59 AP 00380797 06/14/2017 HPI INTERNATIONAL INC 20,869.02 0.00 20,869.02 AP 00380798 06/14/2017 HUNTINGTON HARDWARE 1,273.31 0.00 1,273.31 AP 00380799 06/14/2017 IMPRESSIONS GOURMET CATERING 937.43 0.00 937.43 AP 00380800 06/14/2017 INLAND EMPIRE PROPERTY SERVICES INC 0.00 3,025.00 3,025.00 AP 00380801 06/14/2017 INLAND EMPIRE TOURS AND TRANSPORTATION 1,325.50 0.00 1,325.50 AP 00380802 06/14/2017 INPRO CORPORATION 306.39 0.00 306.39 AP 00380803 06/14/2017 INTELESYS ONE INC 72,565.30 38,447.00 111,012.30 *** AP 00380804 06/14/2017 INTERACTIVE DATA PRICING AND REFERENCE DATA 126.87 0.00 126.87 AP 00380805 06/14/2017 INTERNATIONAL LINE BUILDERS INC 189,263.40 0.00 189,263.40 AP 00380806 06/14/2017 J AND S STRIPING CO INC 23,140.07 0.00 23,140.07 AP 00380807 06/14/2017 JOHN BURR CYCLES INC 1,245.74 0.00 1,245.74 AP 00380808 06/14/2017 JOHNNY ALLEN TENNIS ACADEMY 159.00 0.00 159.00 AP 00380809 06/14/2017 JONES AND MAYER, LAW OFFICES OF 176.00 0.00 176.00 AP 00380810 06/14/2017 JRC HOUSING 3,995.00 0.00 3,995.00 AP 00380811 06/14/2017 JRC HOUSING 2,995.00 0.00 2,995.00 AP 00380812 06/14/2017 K -K WOODWORKING 21.53 0.00 21.53 AP 00380813 06/14/2017 KVAC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES INC 0.00 763.50 763.50 AP 00380814 06/14/2017 LANCE SOLL AND LUNGHARD 17,500.00 0.00 17,500.00 AP 00380815 06/14/2017 LANTAI, KRIS 300.00 0.00 300.00 AP 00380816 06/14/2017 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 0.00 107.36 107.36 AP 00380817 06/14/2017 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 1,544.80 0.00 1,544.80 AP 00380818 06/14/2017 LIFE ASSIST INC 0.00 1,737.43 1,737.43 AP 00380819 06/14/2017 MAIN STREET SIGNS 200.00 0.00 200.00 AP 00380820 06/14/2017 MARIPOSA LANDSCAPES INC 29,131.64 2,052.85 31,184.49 *** AP 00380821 06/14/2017 MARK CHRISTOPHER INC 400.36 124.52 524.88 *** AP 00380822 06/14/2017 MARLINK SA INC 0.00 162.00 162.00 AP 00380823 06/14/2017 MARQUEZ, EMMANUEL E 531.00 0.00 531.00 AP 00380824 06/14/2017 MARSHALL, TERRY 95.39 0.00 95.39 AP 00380825 06/14/2017 MARTINEZ TOWING 175.00 0.00 175.00 AP 00380826 06/14/2017 MATANGA, JULIE EDWARD 229.50 0.00 229.50 AP 00380827 06/14/2017 MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 980.41 0.00 980.41 AP 00380828 06/14/2017 MEDIWASTE DISPOSAL 95.25 0.00 95.25 AP 00380829 06/14/2017 MEDLEY FIRE PROTECTION INC 0.00 180.03 180.03 AP 00380830 06/14/2017 MIDWEST MOTOR SUPPLY 633.43 0.00 633.43 AP 00380831 06/14/2017 MIDWEST TAPE 762.11 0.00 762.11 AP 00380832 06/14/2017 MIJAC ALARM COMPANY 102.00 0.00 102.00 AP 00380833 06/14/2017 MINUTEMAN PRESS 151.93 0.00 151.93 AP 00380834 06/14/2017 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 38.00 0.00 38.00 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 4 Current Date: 07/11/2017 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 15:32:57 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P70 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 6/13/2017 through 7/10/2017 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Citv Fire Amount AP 00380835 06/14/2017 MSA INLAND EMPIRE/DESERT CHAPTER 175.00 0.00 175.00 AP 00380836 06/14/2017 MSNOC INC 1,580.00 0.00 1,580.00 AP 00380837 06/14/2017 NAPA AUTO PARTS 32.66 89.45 122.11 *** AP 00380838 06/14/2017 NAVARRO, JOSE 3,036.00 0.00 3,036.00 AP 00380839 06/14/2017 NEIUBER, ROBERT 208.00 0.00 208.00 AP 00380840 06/14/2017 NEWCO DISTRIBUTORS INC 859.68 0.00 859.68 AP 00380841 06/14/2017 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CTRS OF CA 3,519.50 0.00 3,519.50 AP 00380842 06/14/2017 ONTARIO WINNELSON CO 81.87 0.00 81.87 AP 00380843 06/14/2017 ONTARIO, CITY OF 9,492.22 0.00 9,492.22 AP 00380844 06/14/2017 ONTRAC 69.18 0.00 69.18 AP 00380845 06/14/2017 PACIFIC UTILITY INSTALLATION INC 133,492.00 0.00 133,492.00 AP 00380846 06/14/2017 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 401.77 0.00 401.77 AP 00380847 06/14/2017 PHOENIX GROUP INFORMATION SYSTEMS 2,598.57 0.00 2,598.57 AP 00380848 06/14/2017 PINNACLE TEXTILE INDUSTRIES LLC 272.96 0.00 272.96 AP 00380849 06/14/2017 PRISTINE UNIFORMS LLC 447.06 0.00 447.06 AP 00380850 06/14/2017 PRO SPRAY INC 270.00 0.00 270.00 AP 00380851 06/14/2017 PSA PRINT GROUP 232.74 38.79 271.53 *** AP 00380852 06/14/2017 PW GILLIBRAND INC 1,689.03 0.00 1,689.03 AP 00380853 06/14/2017 QUALITY TRUCK ELECTRIC INC 0.00 915.88 915.88 AP 00380854 06/14/2017 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FONTANA FAMILY YMCA 10,383.85 0.00 10,383.85 AP 00380855 06/14/2017 RICHARD HEATH AND ASSOCIATES 7,551.46 0.00 7,551.46 AP 00380856 06/14/2017 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 47,665.06 1,929.00 49,594.06 *** AP 00380857 06/14/2017 RODMAN, JERII E 150.00 0.00 150.00 AP 00380858 06/14/2017 RODRIGUEZ INC, RY 0.00 1,509.76 1,509.76 AP 00380859 06/14/2017 ROTO ROOTER 2,062.50 2,382.67 4,445.17 *** AP 00380860 06/14/2017 ROYAL WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 2,667.57 0.00 2,667.57 AP 00380861 06/14/2017 RUBENS AUTO COLLISION CENTER 953.66 0.00 953.66 AP 00380862 06/14/2017 SAFELITE FULFILLMENT INC 59.95 0.00 59.95 AP 00380863 06/14/2017 SAFEWAY SIGN COMPANY 5,422.42 0.00 5,422.42 AP 00380864 06/14/2017 SAN BERNARDINO CO AUDITOR CONT 7,700.50 0.00 7,700.50 AP 00380865 06/14/2017 SAN BERNARDINO CO FIRE DEPT 175.00 0.00 175.00 AP 00380866 06/14/2017 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT 3,890.00 0.00 3,890.00 AP 00380867 06/14/2017 SAN BERNARDINO CTY FIRE CHIEF ASSOC 0.00 135.00 135.00 AP 00380868 06/14/2017 SAN BERNARDINO CTY REAL ESTATE SVCS DEPT 9,724.00 0.00 9,724.00 AP 00380869 06/14/2017 SAN BERNARDINO CTY SUPERINTENDENT OF SCH00 1,801.00 0.00 1,801.00 AP 00380870 06/14/2017 SAN BERNARDINO, CITY OF 3,311.66 0.00 3,311.66 AP 00380871 06/14/2017 SC FUELS 19,929.04 0.00 19,929.04 AP 00380872 06/14/2017 SCOTT, APRIL 432.00 0.00 432.00 AP 00380873 06/14/2017 SCOTT, MICHAEL 28.00 0.00 28.00 AP 00380874 06/14/2017 SEANEZ, CARLOS 97.11 0.00 97.11 AP 00380875 06/14/2017 SERRATO & ASSOCIATES 980.00 0.00 980.00 AP 00380876 06/14/2017 S14ERWIN WILLIAMS CO, THE 65.51 0.00 65.51 AP 00380877 06/14/2017 SHOETERIA 646.04 0.00 646.04 AP 00380878 06/14/2017 SHRED PROS 65.00 0.00 65.00 AP 00380879 06/14/2017 SHY, YIH LIN NIEN 51.69 0.00 51.69 AP 00380880 06/14/2017 SNYDER, MAKENZIE 0.00 120.00 120.00 AP 00380881 06/14/2017 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 1,183.72 0.00 1,183.72 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 5 Current Date: 07/11/2017 Report: CK -AGENDA -REG -PORTRAIT -CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 15:32:57 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P71 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT ALyenda Check Register 6/13/2017 through 7/10/2017 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Citv Fire Amount AP 00380882 06/14/2017 SOFTWARE ONE 115,715.98 0.00 115,715.98 AP 00380883 06/14/2017 SOLAR CITY CORPORATION 248,367.03 66,434.90 314,801.93 *** AP 00380884 06/14/2017 SOUTH BAY FOUNDRY INC 1,065.75 0.00 1,065.75 AP 00380885 06/14/2017 SOUTH COAST AQMD 376.41 0.00 376.41 AP 00380890 06/14/2017 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 155,432.34 0.00 155,432.34 AP 00380891 06/14/2017 SPRINT 0.00 131.97 131.97 AP 00380892 06/14/2017 SPROUT SOCIAL INC 4,500.00 0.00 4,500.00 AP 00380893 06/14/2017 STATEWIDE TRAFFIC SAFETY & SIGNS INC 8,847.65 0.00 8,847.65 AP 00380894 06/14/2017 STORAGE CONTAINER.COM 132.00 0.00 132.00 AP 00380895 06/14/2017 SUPERION LLC 2,563.20 0.00 2,563.20 AP 00380896 06/14/2017 SWIFTY SIGN 0.00 120.68 120.68 AP 00380897 06/14/2017 SZABO, JAMES 49.88 0.00 49.88 AP 00380898 06/14/2017 TAM, DERRICK 2,031.00 0.00 2,031.00 AP 00380899 06/14/2017 TAYLOR, RUFUS 47.28 0.00 47.28 AP 00380900 06/14/2017 THEATRE COMMUNICATIONS GROUP 632.68 0.00 632.68 AP 00380901 06/14/2017 TUMBLEWEED PRESS INC 838.60 0.00 838.60 AP 00380902 06/14/2017 U.S. BANK PARS ACCT #6746022500 573.92 0.00 573.92 AP 00380903 06/14/2017 U.S. BANK PARS ACCT #6746022500 9,537.88 0.00 9,537.88 AP 00380904 06/14/2017 UNITED PACIFIC SERVICES INC 7,027.00 0.00 7,027.00 AP 00380905 06/14/2017 UNITED SITE SERVICES OF CA INC 229.98 0.00 229.98 AP 00380906 06/14/2017 UPS 60.38 0.00 60.38 AP 00380907 06/14/2017 UPSCO POWERSAFE SYSTEMS INC 1,151.68 0.00 1,151.68 AP 00380912 06/14/2017 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 5,767.07 0.00 5,767.07 AP 00380913 06/14/2017 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 100.59 0.00 100.59 AP 00380914 06/14/2017 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 60.12 0.00 60.12 AP 00380915 06/14/2017 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 0.00 2,955.75 2,955.75 AP 00380916 06/14/2017 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 182.75 0.00 182.75 AP 00380917 06/14/2017 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 573.15 0.00 573.15 AP 00380918 06/14/2017 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 10.78 0.00 10.78 AP 00380919 06/14/2017 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 118.18 0.00 118.18 AP 00380920 06/14/2017 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 5,085.08 0.00 5,085.08 AP 00380921 06/14/2017 VISION COMMUNICATIONS CO 750.00 0.00 750.00 AP 00380922 06/14/2017 VORTEX INDUSTRIES INC 8,964.00 444.00 9,408.00 *** AP 00380923 06/14/2017 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 3,154.60 0.00 3,154.60 AP 00380924 06/14/2017 WEBBER, DEBORAH 28.21 0.00 28.21 AP 00380925 06/14/2017 WEST COAST LIGHTS & SIRENS 0.00 405.76 405.76 AP 00380926 06/14/2017 WEST END MATERIAL SUPPLY 0.00 74.50 74.50 AP 00380927 06/14/2017 WHITE CAP CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY 45.38 0.00 45.38 AP 00380928 06/14/2017 WILSON, PRINCESS 142.60 0.00 142.60 AP 00380931 06/15/2017 BRODARTBOOKS 7,133.66 0.00 7,133.66 AP 00380932 06/15/2017 FORD OF UPLAND INC 1,652.07 0.00 1,652.07 AP 00380933 06/15/2017 KME FIRE APPARATUS 0.00 2,778.86 2,778.86 AP 00380934 06/15/2017 LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS LLC 5,291.57 0.00 5,291.57 AP 00380936 06/15/2017 OFFICE DEPOT 7,951.20 1,014.02 8,965.22 *** AP 00380937 06/15/2017 ORKIN PEST CONTROL 0.00 420.00 420.00 AP 00380938 06/15/2017 UPLAND AUTO TRIM 940.00 0.00 940.00 AP 00380939 06/15/2017 US POSTMASTER 0.00 1,818.56 1,818.56 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 6 Current Date: 07/11/2017 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 15:32:57 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P72 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 6/13/2017 through 7/10/2017 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Citv Fire Amount AP 00380940 06/21/2017 A & A AUTOMOTIVE AND TIRE INC. 903.97 0.00 903.97 AP 00380941 06/21/2017 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 4,716.37 0.00 4,716.37 AP 00380942 06/21/2017 ABLE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 15,989.00 0.00 15,989.00 AP 00380943 06/21/2017 ADDICTED TO YOGA 511.09 0.00 511.09 AP 00380944 06/21/2017 ADVANCED CHEMICAL TRANSPORT 1,313.50 0.00 1,313.50 AP 00380945 06/21/2017 AFLAC GROUP INSURANCE 40.97 0.00 40.97 AP 00380946 06/21/2017 ALBERTA. WEBB 5,612.87 0.00 5,612.87 AP 00380947 06/21/2017 ALL WELDING 130.00 0.00 130.00 AP 00380948 06/21/2017 ALPHAGRAPHICS 17.11 0.00 17.11 AP 00380949 06/21/2017 ALTA RANCHO PET HOSPITAL 50.00 0.00 50.00 AP 00380950 06/21/2017 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 165.00 0.00 165.00 AP 00380951 06/21/2017 ANTECH DIAGNOSTICS 1,421.00 0.00 1,421.00 AP 00380952 06/21/2017 ANYPROMO INC. 2,762.94 0.00 2,762.94 AP 00380953 06/21/2017 ARC DOCUMENT SOLUTIONS LLC 77.54 0.00 77.54 AP 00380954 06/21/2017 ARROYO, ROSSY 1,000.00 0.00 1,000.00 AP 00380955 01/19/2017 BARTEL ASSOCIATES LLC 2,000.00 0.00 2,000.00 AP 00380956 06/21/2017 BATTERY POWER INC 561.74 0.00 561.74 AP 00380957 06/21/2017 BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS TRAINING INSTITUTE 481.00 0.00 481.00 AP 00380958 06/21/2017 BERTINO AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE 1,092.22 0.00 1,092.22 AP 00380959 06/21/2017 BEST GOLF CARTS INC. 1,958.11 0.00 1,958.11 AP 00380960 06/21/2017 BISHOP COMPANY 434.06 0.00 434.06 AP 00380961 06/21/2017 BSN SPORTS INC. 2,953.84 0.00 2,953.84 AP 00380962 06/21/2017 BUREAU VERITAS NORTH AMERICA INC 3,190.00 0.00 3,190.00 AP 00380963 06/21/2017 BUTSKO UTILITY DESIGN INC. 7,324.84 0.00 7,324.84 AP 00380964 06/21/2017 C V W D 495.73 0.00 495.73 AP 00380965 06/21/2017 C V W D 536.05 0.00 536.05 AP 00380968 06/21/2017 C V W D 73,639.60 597.97 74,237.57 *** AP 00380969 06/21/2017 CABLE INC. 96.00 0.00 96.00 AP 00380970 06/21/2017 CACEO 75.00 0.00 75.00 AP 00380971 06/21/2017 CAL PERS LONG TERM CARE 286.21 0.00 286.21 AP 00380972 06/21/2017 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 60.00 0.00 60.00 AP 00380973 06/21/2017 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 100.00 0.00 100.00 AP 00380974 06/21/2017 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 8.44 0.00 8.44 AP 00380975 06/21/2017 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 426.27 0.00 426.27 AP 00380976 06/21/2017 CAPITAL ONE COMMERCIAL 0.00 580.06 580.06 AP 00380977 06/21/2017 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 682.81 0.00 682.81 AP 00380978 06/21/2017 CARRILLO, MICHAEL 103.76 0.00 103.76 AP 00380979 06/21/2017 CASTELLANOS, JASON 2,300.00 0.00 2,300.00 AP 00380980 06/21/2017 CELLEBRITE USA INC. 3,700.00 0.00 3,700.00 AP 00380981 06/21/2017 CHANCE, RYAN 1,000.00 0.00 1,000.00 AP 00380982 06/21/2017 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 3,499.23 646.24 4,145.47 *** AP 00380983 06/21/2017 CHASING 7 DREAMS 190.00 0.00 190.00 AP 00380984 06/21/2017 CINTAS CORPORATION #150 1,908.63 372.00 2,280.63 *** AP 00380985 06/21/2017 CITY OF FOSTER CITY 2,000.00 0.00 2,000.00 AP 00380986 06/21/2017 CLEAR COAST CONSTRUCTION 265.20 0.00 265.20 AP 00380987 06/21/2017 COLLINS, RICK 43.58 0.00 43.58 AP 00380988 06/21/2017 CONVERGEONE INC. 63,141.43 0.00 63,141.43 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 7 Current Date: 07/11/2017 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 15:32:57 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P73 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Auenda Check Register 6/13/2017 through 7/10/2017 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Citv Fire Amount AP 00380989 06/21/2017 CORBIN & ASSOCIATES 770.00 0.00 770.00 AP 00380990 06/21/2017 CORODATA MEDIA STORAGE INC 975.62 0.00 975.62 AP 00380991 06/21/2017 COST RECOVERY SYSTEMS INC 10,000.00 0.00 10,000.00 AP 00380992 06/21/2017 COWAN, CRYSTAL 250.00 0.00 250.00 AP 00380993 06/21/2017 CPR HERO TRAINING CENTER LLC, THE 204.21 0.00 204.21 AP 00380994 06/21/2017 CRAZATIC ENTERTAINMENT CORP 774.00 0.00 774.00 AP 00380995 06/21/2017 CREATIVE BRAIN LEARNING 1,980.00 0.00 1,980.00 AP 00380996 06/21/2017 CRUZ-CONTRERAS, CAROLINE 516.52 0.00 516.52 AP 00380997 06/21/2017 D M CONTRACTING INC 115,811.88 0.00 115,811.88 AP 00380998 06/21/2017 DANCE DYNAMICS 9,506.36 0.00 9,506.36 AP 00380999 06/21/2017 DATAMARS INC. 547.39 0.00 547.39 AP 00381000 06/21/2017 DEENER, KAYELANI 105.83 0.00 105.83 AP 00381001 06/21/2017 DESER, ABIGAIL 1,400.00 0.00 1,400.00 AP 00381002 06/21/2017 DINEEN, MARY 212.90 0.00 212.90 AP 00381003 06/21/2017 DOMINGUEZ, DESTINIE 207.00 0.00 207.00 AP 00381004 06/21/2017 DUMBELL MAN FITNESS EQUIPMENT, THE 595.69 0.00 595.69 AP 00381005 06/21/2017 EDWARD PROFESSIONAL ADVISORS 525.00 0.00 525.00 AP 00381006 06/21/2017 EIGHTH AVENUE ENTERPRISE LLC 2,407.14 0.00 2,407.14 AP 00381007 06/21/2017 ENGINEERING INNOVATION 0.00 68.77 68.77 AP 00381008 06/21/2017 EXECUTIVE AUTO DETAIL 2,830.00 0.00 2,830.00 AP 00381009 06/21/2017 EXPRESS BRAKE SUPPLY 910.54 0.00 910.54 AP 00381010 06/21/2017 FIRE ETC. 0.00 8,226.45 8,226.45 AP 00381011 06/21/2017 FRED PRYOR SEMINARS/CAREERTRACK 99.00 0.00 99.00 AP 00381013 06/21/2017 FRONTIER COMM 3,025.09 1,931.29 4,956.38 *** AP 00381014 06/21/2017 G AND M BUSINESS INTERIORS 0.00 51.17 51.17 AP 00381015 06/21/2017 GALE, BRIAN 833.00 0.00 833.00 AP 00381016 06/21/2017 GATORWRAPS INC. 537.89 0.00 537.89 AP 00381017 06/21/2017 GEORGE HILLS COMPANY 1,855.70 0.00 1,855.70 AP 00381018 06/21/2017 GOOD YEAR TIRE AND RUBBER CO. 1,009.69 0.00 1,009.69 AP 00381019 06/21/2017 GRAINGER 2,135.52 0.00 2,135.52 AP 00381020 06/21/2017 GRIFFIN STRUCTURES INC 25,395.60 0.00 25,395.60 AP 00381021 06/21/2017 GRIFFIN, SHIRR'L 40.73 0.00 40.73 AP 00381022 06/21/2017 GROVE LUMBER 652.00 0.00 652.00 AP 00381023 06/21/2017 GUNTHER, DIANE 250.00 0.00 250.00 AP 00381024 06/21/2017 HAHN,NANCY 2,148.00 0.00 2,148.00 AP 00381025 06/21/2017 HAWTHORNE LIFT SYSTEMS 1,497.16 0.00 1,497.16 AP 00381026 06/21/2017 HEARTSAVERS LLC 130.00 0.00 130.00 AP 00381027 06/21/2017 HERITAGE EDUCATION GROUP 73.00 0.00 73.00 AP 00381028 06/21/2017 HMC ARCHITECTS 0.00 20,035.00 20,035.00 AP 00381029 06/21/2017 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 645 799.33 0.00 799.33 AP 00381030 06/21/2017 HOSE MAN INC 123.87 0.00 123.87 AP 00381031 06/21/2017 HOT SHOTS ATHLETIC APPAREL INC. 9,624.83 0.00 9,624.83 AP 00381032 06/21/2017 IATSE NATIONAL HEALTH & WELFARE FUNDS 1,200.00 0.00 1,200.00 AP 00381033 06/21/2017 IDEXX DISTRIBUTION INC 4,225.14 0.00 4,225.14 AP 00381034 06/21/2017 IECIAA 35.00 0.00 35.00 AP 00381035 06/21/2017 IMPRESSIONS GOURMET CATERING 377.13 0.00 377.13 AP 00381036 06/21/2017 INDERWIESCHE, MATT 792.00 0.00 792.00 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 8 Current Date: 07/11/2017 Report: CK -AGENDA -REG -PORTRAIT -CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 15:32:57 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P74 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 6/13/2017 through 7/10/2017 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name 9-ty Fire Amount AP 00381037 06/21/2017 INLAND EMPIRE PROPERTY SERVICES INC 0.00 10,555.00 10,555.00 AP 00381038 06/21/2017 INLAND PRESORT & MAILING SERVICES 175.32 0.00 175.32 AP 00381039 06/21/2017 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 155.05 0.00 155.05 AP 00381040 06/21/2017 INLAND VALLEY EMERGENCY PET CLINIC 1,392.00 0.00 1,392.00 AP 00381041 06/21/2017 INTELESYS ONE INC 3,613.19 0.00 3,613.19 AP 00381042 06/21/2017 INTERVET INC 5,918.46 0.00 5,918.46 AP 00381043 06/21/2017 IRON MOUNTAIN OSDP 793.58 0.00 793.58 AP 00381044 06/21/2017 ISLAM, SAIMON 250.00 0.00 250.00 AP 00381045 06/21/2017 J & D GUILLIAM CONSTRUCTION INC 125.00 0.00 125.00 AP 00381046 06/21/2017 JOHN BURR CYCLES INC 257.68 0.00 257.68 AP 00381047 06/21/2017 JOHNNY ALLEN TENNIS ACADEMY 999.60 0.00 999.60 AP 00381048 06/21/2017 KEITH, JORRY 246.00 0.00 246.00 AP 00381049 06/21/2017 KOA CORPORATION 27,210.00 0.00 27,210.00 AP 00381050 06/21/2017 KOSS, TOM 1,839.00 0.00 1,839.00 AP 00381051 06/21/2017 KVAC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES INC 827.50 0.00 827.50 AP 00381052 06/21/2017 LAURA'S BOUTIQUE 165.00 0.00 165.00 AP 00381053 06/21/2017 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 40.00 0.00 40.00 AP 00381054 06/21/2017 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 895.50 0.00 895.50 AP 00381055 06/21/2017 LINDSTROM, TROY 58.07 0.00 58.07 AP 00381056 06/21/2017 LINGER, MARION 50.84 0.00 50.84 AP 00381057 06/21/2017 LINNELL, SHERRY 833.00 0.00 833.00 AP 00381058 06/21/2017 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 5,765.00 0.00 5,765.00 AP 00381059 06/21/2017 LOS ANGELES ENGINEERING INC 642.20 0.00 642.20 AP 00381060 06/21/2017 LOS ANGELES FREIGHTLINER 1,358.75 0.00 1,358.75 AP 00381061 06/21/2017 MARIPOSA LANDSCAPES INC 15,807.37 146.03 15,953.40 *** AP 00381062 06/21/2017 MARLINK SA INC 0.00 2,028.19 2,028.19 AP 00381063 06/21/2017 MC AVOY & MARKHAM 856.60 0.00 856.60 AP 00381064 06/21/2017 MEDELLIN, RAMON 1,200.00 0.00 1,200.00 AP 00381065 06/21/2017 MEDLEY FIRE PROTECTION INC 0.00 397.62 397.62 AP 00381066 06/21/2017 MERCADO, MATTHEW 312.25 0.00 312.25 AP 00381067 06/21/2017 MIDWEST TAPE 1,136.69 0.00 1,136.69 AP 00381068 06/21/2017 MINUTEMAN PRESS 1,175.05 0.00 1,175.05 AP 00381069 06/21/2017 MIRACLE RECREATION EQUIPMENT COPANY 293.32 0.00 293.32 AP 00381070 06/21/2017 MOUNTAIN VIEW FAITH COMMUNITY CHUCH 422.18 0.00 422.18 AP 00381071 06/21/2017 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 441.63 0.00 441.63 AP 00381072 06/21/2017 NAPA AUTO PARTS 13.27 0.00 13.27 AP 00381073 06/21/2017 NBS 9,750.00 0.00 9,750.00 AP 00381074 06/21/2017 NIGHTHAWK TOTAL CONTROL 133.75 0.00 133.75 AP 00381075 06/21/2017 NOVELTY PRINTING 0.00 1,033.07 1,033.07 AP 00381076 06/21/2017 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CTRS OF CA 720.29 0.00 720.29 AP 00381077 06/21/2017 ONTARIO WINNELSON CO 69.88 0.00 69.88 AP 00381078 06/21/2017 ONTRAC 78.91 0.00 78.91 AP 00381079 06/21/2017 ONWARD ENGINEERING 18,325.12 352.63 18,677.75 *** AP 00381080 06/21/2017 PACIFIC PREMIER BANK 0.00 67,448.48 67,448.48 AP 00381081 06/21/2017 PARS 3,500.00 0.00 3,500.00 AP 00381082 06/21/2017 PARSAC 326,475.00 0.00 326,475.00 AP 00381083 06/21/2017 PARSAC 163,426.00 0.00 163,426.00 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 9 Current Date: 07/11/2017 Report; CK -AGENDA -REG -PORTRAIT -CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 15:32:57 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P75 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 6/13/2017 through 7/10/2017 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Citv Fire Amount AP 00381084 06/21/2017 PATCHETT & ASSOCIATES 2,035.86 0.00 2,035.86 AP 00381085 06/21/2017 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 137.87 0.00 137.87 AP 00381086 06/21/2017 PETROVICH, VICTORIA 833.00 0.00 833.00 AP 00381087 06/21/2017 PH&S PRODUCTS LLC 0.00 4,360.00 4,360.00 AP 00381088 06/21/2017 PHAN,NAATHAN 1,123.00 0.00 1,123.00 AP 00381089 06/21/2017 PORAC 236.50 0.00 236.50 AP 00381090 06/21/2017 PRE -PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 96.59 0.00 96.59 AP 00381091 06/21/2017 PRIME GLASS 252.40 0.00 252.40 AP 00381092 06/21/2017 PROMOTIONS TEES & MORE 11,985.97 0.00 11,985.97 AP 00381093 06/21/2017 PSA PRINT GROUP 232.74 0.00 232.74 AP 00381094 06/21/2017 RAMSEY, DINA PIAZZA- 62.24 0.00 62.24 AP 00381095 06/21/2017 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 245.67 0.00 245.67 AP 00381096 06/21/2017 RC COMMUNITY & ARTS FOUNDATION 4,142.00 0.00 4,142.00 AP 00381097 06/21/2017 RC CONSTRUCTION SERVICES INC 0.00 1,281,521.14 1,281,521.14 AP 00381098 06/21/2017 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 85.50 0.00 85.50 AP 00381099 06/21/2017 RJM DESIGN GROUP INC 1,200.00 0.00 1,200.00 AP 00381100 06/21/2017 ROADRUNNER PHARMACY 461.56 0.00 461.56 AP 00381101 06/21/2017 ROBINSON, NICK 750.00 0.00 750.00 AP 00381102 06/21/2017 ROBLEDO, DONNA 45.66 0.00 45.66 AP 00381103 06/21/2017 ROTO ROOTER 4,070.00 0.00 4,070.00 AP 00381104 06/21/2017 ROYAL WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 5,886.87 336.17 6,223.04 *** AP 00381105 06/21/2017 SAFE -ENTRY TECHNICAL INC 0.00 525.00 525.00 AP 00381106 06/21/2017 SAFETY KLEEN SYSTEMS INC 0.00 210.11 210.11 AP 00381107 06/21/2017 SAMS CLUB/SYNCHRONY BANK 169.40 0.00 169.40 AP 00381108 06/21/2017 SAMUEL FRENCH INC 1,050.00 0.00 1,050.00 AP 00381109 06/21/2017 SAN BERNARDINO CTY SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOO 1,801.00 0.00 1,801.00 AP 00381110 06/21/2017 SARGENT TOWN PLANNING INC 102,760.89 0.00 102,760.89 AP 00381111 06/21/2017 SBC TREASURER TAX COLLECTOR 300.00 0.00 300.00 AP 00381112 06/21/2017 SBPEA 966.09 0.00 966.09 AP 00381113 06/21/2017 SC FUELS 0.00 10,260.27 10,260.27 AP 00381114 06/21/2017 SC FUELS 0.00 1,790.02 1,790.02 AP 00381115 06/21/2017 SCOTT SAFETY 0.00 577.22 577.22 AP 00381116 06/21/2017 SCOTT'S PPE RECON INC 0.00 453.55 453.55 AP 00381117 06/21/2017 SERRATO & ASSOCIATES 245.00 0.00 245.00 AP 00381118 06/21/2017 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 446.95 0.00 446.95 AP 00381119 06/21/2017 SHRED IT USA LLC 334.00 0.00 334.00 AP 00381120 06/21/2017 SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC 1,622.35 0.00 1,622.35 AP 00381121 06/21/2017 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 577.85 0.00 577.85 AP 00381122 06/21/2017 SOFTWARE ONE 251,574.92 37,513.00 289,087.92 *** AP 00381123 06/21/2017 SOUTH COAST AQMD 450.00 0.00 450.00 AP 00381126 06/21/2017 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 65,510.47 0.00 65,510.47 AP 00381127 06/21/2017 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.28 0.00 19.28 AP 00381128 06/21/2017 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 465.11 0.00 465.11 AP 00381129 06/21/2017 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 628.10 0.00 628.10 AP 00381130 06/21/2017 SUNGARD PUBLIC SECTOR INC 875.00 0.00 875.00 AP 00381131 06/21/2017 SYN -TECH SYSTEMS 27,553.93 7,458.84 35,012.77 *** AP 00381132 06/21/2017 SYSCO LOS ANGELES INC 652.99 0.00 652.99 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 10 Current Date: 07/11/2017 Report: CK_AGENDA REG_PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 15:32:57 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P76 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 6/13/2017 through 7/10/2017 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Citv Fire Amount AP 00381133 06/21/2017 TIFFHUGH INVESTMENT LLC 0.00 50.00 50.00 AP 00381134 06/21/2017 TINT CITY WINDOW TINTING 90.00 0.00 90.00 AP 00381135 06/21/2017 TRAFFIC PARTS 890.67 0.00 890.67 AP 00381136 06/21/2017 ULINE 139.71 0.00 139.71 AP 00381137 06/21/2017 UNIQUE MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC 398.09 0.00 398.09 AP 00381138 06/21/2017 UNITED PACIFIC SERVICES INC 8,076.00 0.00 8,076.00 AP 00381139 06/21/2017 UNITED SCENIC ARTISTS PENSION AND WELFARE FU 800.00 0.00 800.00 AP 00381140 06/21/2017 UNITED WAY 131.00 0.00 131.00 AP 00381141 06/21/2017 UPS 170.47 0.00 170.47 AP 00381142 06/21/2017 US POSTMASTER 20,000.00 0.00 20,000.00 AP 00381143 06/21/2017 UTILIQUEST 1,132.07 0.00 1,132.07 AP 00381144 06/21/2017 VALVERDE SCHOOL OF PERFORMING ARTS 20,000.00 0.00 20,000.00 AP 00381145 06/21/2017 VAN SCOYOC ASSOCIATES INC 4,000.00 0.00 4,000.00 AP 00381146 06/21/2017 VEND U COMPANY 762.74 0.00 762.74 AP 00381147 06/21/2017 VENTURA TREE MANAGEMENT 100.00 0.00 100.00 AP 00381148 06/21/2017 VERIZON 23.15 0.00 23.15 AP 00381149 06/21/2017 VICTOR MEDICAL COMPANY 9,830.76 0.00 9,830.76 AP 00381150 06/21/2017 VINCENT, DIANA 46.69 0.00 46.69 AP 00381151 06/21/2017 VIRTUAL PROJECT MANAGER INC 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00381152 06/21/2017 VISION SERVICE PLAN CA 11,048.86 0.00 11,048.86 AP 00381153 06/21/2017 VORTEX INDUSTRIES INC 0.00 2,294.38 2,294.38 AP 00381154 06/21/2017 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 2,411.36 492.71 2,904.07 *** AP 00381155 06/21/2017 WELLS, ERIC 0.00 70.00 70.00 AP 00381156 06/21/2017 WILCOX SALES CO 541.58 0.00 541.58 AP 00381157 06/21/2017 WOHLERT, MATTHEW 249.64 0.00 249.64 AP 00381158 06/21/2017 WORLD ELITE GYMNASTICS 112.00 0.00 112.00 AP 00381159 06/21/2017 ZALEWSKI, JOHN 833.00 0.00 833.00 AP 00381160 06/21/2017 ZOETIS US LLC 668.51 0.00 668.51 AP 00381161 06/22/2017 ABC LOCKSMITHS 1,173.53 239.42 1,412.95 *** AP 00381162 06/22/2017 AGILINE LLC 1,480.00 0.00 1,480.00 AP 00381163 06/22/2017 AIRGAS USA LLC 79.61 278.25 357.86 *** AP 00381164 06/22/2017 BIBLIOTHECA LLC 87,705.05 0.00 87,705.05 AP 00381166 06/22/2017 BRODART BOOKS 1,321.26 0.00 1,321.26 AP 00381167 06/22/2017 CALSENSE 1,575.81 0.00 1,575.81 AP 00381168 06/22/2017 CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO INC 5,297.17 0.00 5,297.17 AP 00381169 06/22/2017 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 317.18 0.00 317.18 AP 00381170 06/22/2017 EMCOR SERVICE 17,699.00 0.00 17,699.00 AP 00381171 06/22/2017 FASTENAL COMPANY 1,058.75 0.00 1,058.75 AP 00381172 06/22/2017 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 86.34 0.00 86.34 AP 00381173 06/22/2017 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 470.00 0.00 470.00 AP 00381174 06/22/2017 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 22,937.82 0.00 22,937.82 AP 00381175 06/22/2017 LANDCARE USA LLC 3,120.00 0.00 3,120.00 AP 00381176 06/22/2017 LN CURTIS AND SONS 0.00 1,815.59 1,815.59 AP 00381177 06/22/2017 OFFICE DEPOT 2,385.47 0.00 2,385.47 AP 00381178 06/22/2017 ORKIN PEST CONTROL 108.00 67.00 175.00 *** AP 00381179 06/22/2017 OVERDRIVE INC 2,560.20 0.00 2,560.20 AP 00381180 06/22/2017 SUNRISE FORD 430.94 0.00 430.94 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 11 Current Date: 07/11/2017 Report: CK -AGENDA -REG -PORTRAIT -CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 15:32:57 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P77 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 6/13/2017 through 7/10/2017 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Citv Fire Amount AP 00381181 06/22/2017 VISTA PAINT 4,401.29 0.00 4,401.29 AP 00381182 06/22/2017 CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE OF 3,103.95 711.40 3,815.35 *** AP 00381183 06/27/2017 CURATALO, JAMES 0.00 1,733.29 1,733.29 AP 00381184 06/27/2017 KIRKPATRICK, WILLIAM 0.00 4,888.65 4,888.65 AP 00381185 06/27/2017 LONCAR, PHILIP 0.00 1,019.78 1,019.78 AP 00381186 06/27/2017 TOWNSEND, JAMES 0.00 1,733.29 1,733.29 AP 00381187 06/27/2017 WALKER, KENNETH 0.00 261.76 261.76 AP 00381188 06/28/2017 CAMPOS, ENMA P. 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00381189 06/28/2017 A & A AUTOMOTIVE AND TIRE INC. 530.81 0.00 530.81 AP 00381190 06/28/2017 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 98.82 0.00 98.82 AP 00381191 06/28/2017 ABLE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1,474.69 0.00 1,474.69 AP 00381192 06/28/2017 AIR & HOSE SOURCE INC. 48.06 0.00 48.06 AP 00381193 06/28/2017 ALCORN, RICHARD 10.00 0.00 10.00 AP 00381194 06/28/2017 ALLIANCE BUS LINES INC 1,338.34 0.00 1,338.34 AP 00381195 06/28/2017 ALLIED UNIVERSAL SECURITY SERVICES 5,418.24 0.00 5,418.24 AP 00381196 06/28/2017 ALPHAGRAPHICS 34.02 0.00 34.02 AP 00381197 06/28/2017 ALTA VISTA MOBILE HOME PARK 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00381198 06/28/2017 ALTEC INDUSTRIES INC 5,586.82 0.00 5,586.82 AP 00381199 06/28/2017 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 16,470.00 0.00 16,470.00 AP 00381200 06/28/2017 ANDY GUMP 422.80 0.00 422.80 AP 00381201 06/28/2017 ANYPROMO INC. 1,472.93 0.00 1,472.93 AP 00381202 06/28/2017 AQUABIO ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES INC. 1,745.00 0.00 1,745.00 AP 00381203 06/28/2017 AROCHO, ALMA 1,428.00 0.00 1,428.00 AP 00381204 06/28/2017 ASSI SECURITY 1,465.00 0.00 1,465.00 AP 00381205 06/28/2017 AT&T 470.71 0.00 470.71 AP 00381206 06/28/2017 AUTO AND RV SPECIALISTS INC. 169.60 0.00 169.60 AP 00381207 06/28/2017 BARNES AND NOBLE 2,996.37 0.00 2,996.37 AP 00381208 06/28/2017 BARNES, CHRISTOPHER 1,000.00 0.00 1,000.00 AP 00381209 06/28/2017 BAUER COMPRESSORS 0.00 2,445.50 2,445.50 AP 00381210 06/28/2017 BAYER HEALTHCARE LLC 62.30 0.00 62.30 AP 00381211 06/28/2017 BELTRAN, MALLORY 3.96 0.00 3.96 AP 00381212 06/28/2017 BENNETT, JAN 22.83 0.00 22.83 AP 00381213 06/28/2017 BERLITZ 110.00 0.00 110.00 AP 00381214 06/28/2017 BERN MARIES PROMOTIONAL PRODUCTS 1,028.15 0.00 1,028.15 AP 00381215 06/28/2017 BLUM ELECTRIC 1,772.30 0.00 1,772.30 AP 00381216 06/28/2017 BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERVICES INC. 114,191.22 0.00 114,191.22 AP 00381217 06/28/2017 BROWN, JILL 245.43 0.00 245.43 AP 00381218 06/28/2017 BUIS, DIANA 28.01 0.00 28.01 AP 00381220 06/28/2017 C V W D 63,761.12 0.00 63,761.12 AP 00381221 06/28/2017 CA LLC - DBA ALTA LAGUNA MHP 600.00 0.00 600.00 AP 00381222 06/28/2017 CACEO 150.00 0.00 150.00 AP 00381223 06/28/2017 CAL PERS 137,259.99 7,285.35 144,545.34 *** AP 00381224 06/28/2017 CAL STATE SITE SERVICES 3,763.50 0.00 3,763.50 AP 00381225 06/28/2017 CALIFORNIA BANK & TRUST 36,661.07 0.00 36,661.07 AP 00381226 06/28/2017 CALIFORNIA SHOPPING CART RETRIEVAL CORP 35.00 0.00 35.00 AP 00381227 06/28/2017 CAMP FIRE ISCC 5,000.00 0.00 5,000.00 AP 00381228 06/28/2017 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 1,172.40 2.61 1,175.01 *** User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 12 Current Date: 07/11/2017 Report: CK -AGENDA -REG -PORTRAIT -CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 15:32:57 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P78 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 6/13/2017 through 7/10/2017 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Citv Fire Amount AP 00381229 06/28/2017 CARSWELL, ZACHARY 2,000.00 0.00 2,000.00 AP 00381230 06/28/2017 CARTY, DIANE 570.00 0.00 570.00 AP 00381231 06/28/2017 CASA VOLANTE MOBILE HOME PARK 900.00 0.00 900.00 AP 00381232 06/28/2017 CCAC 200.00 0.00 200.00 AP 00381233 06/28/2017 CHAPARRAL HEIGHTS MOBILE HOME PARK 700.00 0.00 700.00 AP 00381234 06/28/2017 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES INC. 4,070.00 0.00 4,070.00 AP 00381235 06/28/2017 CHINO MOWER AND ENGINE SERVICE 365.91 0.00 365.91 AP 00381236 06/28/2017 CHU, MICHAEL 132.00 0.00 132.00 AP 00381237 06/28/2017 CHUNG, MICHAEL 5.19 0.00 5.19 AP 00381238 06/28/2017 CHURCH OF CHRIST 250.00 0.00 250.00 AP 00381239 06/28/2017 CINTAS CORPORATION #150 5,766.99 407.44 6,174.43 *** AP 00381240 06/28/2017 CLARK, KAREN 945.00 0.00 945.00 AP 00381241 06/28/2017 CLEANRIVER RECYCLING SOLUTIONS 3,495.00 0.00 3,495.00 AP 00381242 06/28/2017 CLIENT FIRST CONSULTING GROUP 6,725.00 0.00 6,725.00 AP 00381243 06/28/2017 CLIMATEC LLC 1,187.23 0.00 1,187.23 AP 00381244 06/28/2017 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTR INC 190.72 0.00 190.72 AP 00381245 06/28/2017 CORODATA MEDIA STORAGE INC 1,229.36 0.00 1,229.36 AP 00381246 06/28/2017 COUNTRY ESTATE FENCE CO INC 2,618.17 0.00 2,618.17 AP 00381247 06/28/2017 CREATIVE BRAIN LEARNING 792.00 0.00 792.00 AP 00381248 06/28/2017 CROP PRODUCTION SERVICES INC 1,050.70 0.00 1,050.70 AP 00381249 06/28/2017 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 4,173.00 0.00 4,173.00 AP 00381250 06/28/2017 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 893.25 0.00 893.25 AP 00381251 06/28/2017 DAISY 720.26 0.00 720.26 AP 00381252 06/28/2017 DEAIBES, DANIEL 10.74 0.00 10.74 AP 00381253 06/28/2017 DELGADO, CHRISTINE 15.00 0.00 15.00 AP 00381254 06/28/2017 DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES 73.00 0.00 73.00 AP 00381255 06/28/2017 DESIGN MASONRY 608.35 0.00 608.35 AP 00381256 06/28/2017 DOWNEY, JENNIFER 29.18 0.00 29.18 AP 00381257 06/28/2017 DREAM SHAPERS 475.00 0.00 475.00 AP 00381258 06/28/2017 DUGMORE & DUNCAN INC. 0.00 1,365.04 1,365.04 AP 00381259 06/28/2017 DUMBELL MAN FITNESS EQUIPMENT, THE 1,040.08 0.00 1,040.08 AP 00381260 06/28/2017 DUNN, ANN MARIE 576.00 0.00 576.00 AP 00381261 06/28/2017 DURKEL, CAROL 147.24 0.00 147.24 AP 00381262 06/28/2017 E POLY STAR INC. 1,724.00 0.00 1,724.00 AP 00381263 06/28/2017 EASTERLING, RAY 393.60 0.00 393.60 AP 00381264 06/28/2017 ENTERSECT CORP 79.00 0.00 79.00 AP 00381265 06/28/2017 EXECUTIVE AUTO DETAIL 480.00 0.00 480.00 AP 00381266 06/28/2017 EXPRESS BRAKE SUPPLY 41.41 0.00 41.41 AP 00381267 06/28/2017 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS 0.00 1,004.97 1,004.97 AP 00381268 06/28/2017 FELICIANO, GASPAR ANTHONY 480.00 0.00 480.00 AP 00381269 06/28/2017 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC #1350 267.30 0.00 267.30 AP 00381270 06/28/2017 FLAG SYSTEMS INC. 1,750.00 0.00 1,750.00 AP 00381271 06/28/2017 FLIP GYMNASTICS 250.00 0.00 250.00 AP 00381272 06/28/2017 FOOTHILL FAMILY SHELTER 2,500.00 0.00 2,500.00 AP 00381273 06/28/2017 FOOTHILL MOBILE MANOR 300.00 0.00 300.00 AP 00381274 06/28/2017 FRED PRYOR SEMINARS/CAREERTRACK 178.00 0.00 178.00 AP 00381275 06/28/2017 FRONTIER FORD 0.00 154,208.20 154,208.20 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 13 Current Date: 07/11/2017 Report: CK -AGENDA -REG -PORTRAIT -CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 15:32:57 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P79 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 6/13/2017 through 7/10/2017 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name LLty Fire Amount AP 00381276 06/28/2017 GATORWRAPS INC. 612.89 0.00 612.89 AP 00381277 06/28/2017 GILLISON, JOHN 400.00 0.00 400.00 AP 00381278 06/28/2017 GIORDANO, MARIANNA 115.20 0.00 115.20 AP 00381279 06/28/2017 GOLDEN STATE RISK MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY 100,273.00 1,306.00 101,579.00 *** AP 00381280 06/28/2017 GOOD YEAR TIRE AND RUBBER CO. 5,939.13 0.00 5,939.13 AP 00381281 06/28/2017 GRAINGER 2,251.63 46.78 2,298.41 *** AP 00381282 06/28/2017 HAMILTON, MONIQUE 960.00 0.00 960.00 AP 00381283 06/28/2017 HARDY & HARPER INC 8,594.43 0.00 8,594.43 AP 00381284 06/28/2017 HCI SYSTEMS INC. 118.38 0.00 118.38 AP 00381285 06/28/2017 HENRY SCHEIN ANIMAL HEALTH SUPPLY 539.17 0.00 539.17 AP 00381286 06/28/2017 HI WAY SAFETY INC 1,172.54 0.00 1,172.54 AP 00381287 06/28/2017 HOLDER, DIANE 100.00 0.00 100.00 AP 00381288 06/28/2017 HOMETOWN AMERICA RAMONA VILLA 900.00 0.00 900.00 AP 00381289 06/28/2017 HORIZON SOLAR POWER 115.77 0.00 115.77 AP 00381290 06/28/2017 HORIZONS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY INTERNATIOT 0.00 231,626.07 231,626.07 AP 00381291 06/28/2017 HOSE MAN INC 325.10 49.74 374.84 *** AP 00381292 06/28/2017 HOUR GLASS & MIRROR INC. 591.04 0.00 591.04 AP 00381293 06/28/2017 HUNTINGTON HARDWARE 566.18 0.00 566.18 AP 00381294 06/28/2017 INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO INC 0.00 437.28 437.28 AP 00381295 06/28/2017 INLAND FAIR HOUSING AND MEDIATION BOARD 1,379.51 0.00 1,379.51 AP 00381296 06/28/2017 INTERACTIVE DATA PRICING AND REFERENCE DATA 126.87 0.00 126.87 AP 00381297 06/28/2017 JOHNNY ALLEN TENNIS ACADEMY 3,243.00 0.00 3,243.00 AP 00381298 06/28/2017 JRC HOUSING 8,275.00 0.00 8,275.00 AP 00381299 06/28/2017 JRC HOUSING 4,995.00 0.00 4,995.00 AP 00381300 06/28/2017 JRC HOUSING 6,085.00 0.00 6,085.00 AP 00381301 06/28/2017 JTB SUPPLY COMPANY 4,697.90 0.00 4,697.90 AP 00381302 06/28/2017 KIMBALL MIDWEST 237.59 0.00 237.59 AP 00381303 06/28/2017 LATREACE, RAINEY 476.00 0.00 476.00 AP 00381304 06/28/2017 LEITNER STACEY 450.00 0.00 450.00 AP 00381305 06/28/2017 LIFE ASSIST INC 0.00 135.40 135.40 AP 00381306 06/28/2017 LIM, JU YOUNG 2,000.00 0.00 2,000.00 AP 00381307 06/28/2017 LINGER, MARION 129.69 0.00 129.69 AP 00381308 06/28/2017 LOCKWOOD, NATALIE 100.00 0.00 100.00 AP 00381309 06/28/2017 LOS ANGELES TIMES 749.49 0.00 749.49 AP 00381310 06/28/2017 MADOLE AND ASSOCIATES INC 6,320.00 0.00 6,320.00 AP 00381311 06/28/2017 MARIPOSA LANDSCAPES INC 35,066.45 2,052.85 37,119.30 *** AP 00381312 06/28/2017 MARK CHRISTOPHER INC 0.00 78.64 78.64 AP 00381313 06/28/2017 MARRUFO, JOANNA 152.15 0.00 152.15 AP 00381314 06/28/2017 MAXWELL, MICHELLE 18.00 0.00 18.00 AP 00381315 06/28/2017 MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 198.97 480.10 679.07 *** AP 00381316 06/28/2017 MCWILLIAMS, HANNELORE 28.04 0.00 28.04 AP 00381317 06/28/2017 MEDLEY FIRE PROTECTION INC 5,346.49 0.00 5,346.49 AP 00381318 06/28/2017 MERRIWEATHER, SEQUOIA 45.66 0.00 45.66 AP 00381319 06/28/2017 MIDWEST TAPE 1,413.34 0.00 1,413.34 AP 00381320 06/28/2017 MMASC 0.00 85.00 85.00 AP 00381321 06/28/2017 MORGAN, ASHLEY 246.40 0.00 246.40 AP 00381322 06/28/2017 MOUNTAIN VIEW FAITH COMMUNITY CHUCH 25.94 0.00 25.94 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 14 Current Date: 07/11/2017 Report: CK -AGENDA -REG -PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 15:32:57 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P80 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 6/13/2017 through 7/10/2017 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Citv Fire Amount AP 00381323 06/28/2017 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 219.00 0.00 219.00 AP 00381324 06/28/2017 NAPA AUTO PARTS 16.17 151.26 167.43 *** AP 00381325 06/28/2017 NATIONAL FIRE FIGHTER WILDLAND 0.00 669.20 669.20 AP 00381326 06/28/2017 NEW IMAGE INTERIOR FLOORING 0.00 2,754.48 2,754.48 AP 00381327 06/28/2017 NIXON EGLI EQUIPMENT CO 2,935.15 0.00 2,935.15 AP 00381328 06/28/2017 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CTRS OF CA 2,381.79 0.00 2,381.79 AP 00381329 06/28/2017 ONTARIO WINNELSON CO 0.00 390.32 390.32 AP 00381330 06/28/2017 ORONA, PATRICIA 660.00 0.00 660.00 AP 00381331 06/28/2017 OTT, LAURA 732.00 0.00 732.00 AP 00381332 06/28/2017 OTT, SHARON 612.00 0.00 612.00 AP 00381333 06/28/2017 PAPAZOGLU, NORAY 1,051.20 0.00 1,051.20 AP 00381334 06/28/2017 PARMER, MICHAEL 231.10 0.00 231.10 AP 00381335 06/28/2017 PEPSI -COLA 741.41 0.00 741.41 AP 00381336 06/28/2017 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 741.35 0.00 741.35 AP 00381337 06/28/2017 PHOENIX GROUP INFORMATION SYSTEMS 40.94 0.00 40.94 AP 00381338 06/28/2017 PINES MOBILE HOME PARK, THE 400.00 0.00 400.00 AP 00381339 06/28/2017 PIONEER MANUFACTURING 123.39 0.00 123.39 AP 00381340 06/28/2017 PLUMP ENGINEERING 997.38 0.00 997.38 AP 00381341 06/28/2017 PORAC LEGAL DEFENSE FUND 274.50 0.00 274.50 AP 00381342 06/28/2017 RANCHO CUCAMONGA QUAKES 155.00 0.00 155.00 AP 00381343 06/28/2017 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 20.20 0.00 20.20 AP 00381344 06/28/2017 RC COMMUNITY & ARTS FOUNDATION 6,750.00 0.00 6,750.00 AP 00381345 06/28/2017 RD SERVICES 277.00 0.00 277.00 AP 00381346 06/28/2017 RDO EQUIPMENT COMPANY 1,131.15 0.00 1,131.15 AP 00381347 06/28/2017 RESOURCE BUILDING MATERIALS 946.23 0.00 946.23 AP 00381348 06/28/2017 RIGLEMAN, ENCARNACION ONTIVEROS 120.00 0.00 120.00 AP 00381349 06/28/2017 RILES, DAVID 129.69 0.00 129.69 AP 00381350 06/28/2017 ROTO ROOTER 461.89 0.00 461.89 AP 00381351 06/28/2017 ROYAL WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 2,647.29 0.00 2,647.29 AP 00381352 06/28/2017 S.CALIF MUNICIPAL ATHLETIC FEDERATION 310.00 0.00 310.00 AP 00381353 06/28/2017 SAFARILAND LLC 0.00 420.23 420.23 AP 00381354 06/28/2017 SAFE -ENTRY TECHNICAL INC 0.00 4,690.95 4,690.95 AP 00381355 06/28/2017 SALAZAR, ANGELICA 105.17 0.00 105.17 AP 00381356 06/28/2017 SAMPLES, RYAN 103.44 0.00 103.44 AP 00381357 06/28/2017 SAN BERNARDINO CTY 0.00 11,890.52 11,890.52 AP 00381358 06/28/2017 SC FUELS 0.00 635.29 635.29 AP 00381359 06/28/2017 SENECHAL, CALVIN 470.40 0.00 470.40 AP 00381360 06/28/2017 SHEAKLEY PENSION ADMINISTRATION 0.00 155.95 155.95 AP 00381361 06/28/2017 SHEAKLEY PENSION ADMINISTRATION 329.45 0.00 329.45 AP 00381362 06/28/2017 SHRED PROS 0.00 35.00 35.00 AP 00381363 06/28/2017 SIR SPEEDY 1,154.15 0.00 1,154.15 AP 00381364 06/28/2017 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 6,004.94 0.00 6,004.94 AP 00381365 06/28/2017 SNAP ON TOOLS 529.06 0.00 529.06 AP 00381366 06/28/2017 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 187.19 348.54 535.73 *** AP 00381367 06/28/2017 SOLAR CITY CORPORATION 123.40 0.00 123.40 AP 00381368 06/28/2017 SOLIMAN, KAREN 250.00 0.00 250.00 AP 00381375 06/28/2017 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 20,654.43 1,973.34 22,627.77 *** User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 15 Current Date: 07/11/2017 Report: CK -AGENDA -REG -PORTRAIT -CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 15:32:57 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P81 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 6/13/2017 through 7/10/2017 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Li!y Fire Amount AP 00381376 06/28/2017 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA NEWS GROUP 1,700.00 0.00 1,700.00 AP 00381377 06/28/2017 SOUTHLAND SPORTS OFFICIALS 184.00 0.00 184.00 AP 00381378 06/28/2017 STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY 4,088.72 0.00 4,088.72 AP 00381379 06/28/2017 STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY 13,237.45 0.00 13,237.45 AP 00381380 06/28/2017 STOR'EM SELF STORAGE 895.00 0.00 895.00 AP 00381381 06/28/2017 STOTZ EQUIPMENT 1,024.93 0.00 1,024.93 AP 00381382 06/28/2017 SUNRUN INSTALLATION SERVICES INC 61.70 0.00 61.70 AP 00381383 06/28/2017 SWARTZ, ALAN 81.00 0.00 81.00 AP 00381384 06/28/2017 SYCAMORE VILLA MOBILE HOME PARK 400.00 0.00 400.00 AP 00381385 06/28/2017 SYN -TECH SYSTEMS 1,790.00 0.00 1,790.00 AP 00381386 06/28/2017 THOMSON REUTERS WEST PUBLISHING CORP 331.00 0.00 331.00 AP 00381387 06/28/2017 TORO TOWING 150.00 0.00 150.00 AP 00381388 06/28/2017 TOVEY/SHULTZ CONSTRUCTION INC 237,823.26 0.00 237,823.26 AP 00381389 06/28/2017 TYUS, IDA 189.00 0.00 189.00 AP 00381390 06/28/2017 U.S. BANK PARS ACCT #6746022500 573.92 0.00 573.92 AP 00381391 06/28/2017 U.S. BANK PARS ACCT #6746022500 6,605.00 0.00 6,605.00 AP 00381392 06/28/2017 U.S. BANK PARS ACCT #6746022500 2,666.70 0.00 2,666.70 AP 00381393 06/28/2017 ULINE 1,902.00 0.00 1,902.00 AP 00381394 06/28/2017 UNDERGROUND SVC ALERT OF SO CAL 256.50 0.00 256.50 AP 00381395 06/28/2017 UNITED PACIFIC SERVICES INC 2,768.00 0.00 2,768.00 AP 00381396 06/28/2017 UNITED SITE SERVICES OF CA INC 273.30 0.00 273.30 AP 00381397 06/28/2017 UPS 10.51 0.00 10.51 AP 00381398 06/28/2017 UTILIQUEST 1,705.27 0.00 1,705.27 AP 00381399 06/28/2017 VALLEY POWER SYSTEMS INC 783.71 54.33 838.04 *** AP 00381400 06/28/2017 VERIZON BUSINESS 80.56 0.00 80.56 AP 00381401 06/28/2017 VICTOR MEDICAL COMPANY 217.03 0.00 217.03 AP 00381402 06/28/2017 VIVERAE INC 10.95 0.00 10.95 AP 00381403 06/28/2017 VORTEX INDUSTRIES INC 758.00 0.00 758.00 AP 00381404 06/28/2017 WALKER, ROBERT 0.00 270.00 270.00 AP 00381405 06/28/2017 WALKER, VONTA 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00381406 06/28/2017 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 4,514.74 0.00 4,514.74 AP 00381407 06/28/2017 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 8,578.13 0.00 8,578.13 AP 00381408 06/28/2017 WESTRUX INTERNATIONAL INC 234.56 0.00 234.56 AP 00381409 06/28/2017 WHITE HOUSE PHOTO INC 1,050.00 0.00 1,050.00 AP 00381410 06/28/2017 WHITTIER FERTILIZER 2,909.25 0.00 2,909.25 AP 00381411 06/28/2017 WONDRIES FLEET GROUP 125,656.16 0.00 125,656.16 AP 00381412 06/28/2017 WORLD ELITE GYMNASTICS 196.00 0.00 196.00 AP 00381415 06/28/2017 XEROX CORPORATION 10,177.37 450.45 10,627.82 *** AP 00381416 06/28/2017 ZOETIS US LLC 328.85 0.00 328.85 AP 00381417 06/28/2017 ZONES CORPORATE SOLUTIONS 3,566.62 0.00 3,566.62 AP 00381418 06/29/2017 CAL PERS 137,259.99 8,285.35 145,545.34 *** AP 00381419 06/29/2017 ABC LOCKSMITHS 274.02 1,792.13 2,066.15 *** AP 00381420 06/29/2017 BIBLIOTHECA LLC 1,751.75 0.00 1,751.75 AP 00381426 06/29/2017 BRODART BOOKS 23,005.36 0.00 23,005.36 AP 00381427 06/29/2017 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 0.00 192.27 192.27 AP 00381428 06/29/2017 EMCOR SERVICE 660.00 0.00 660.00 AP 00381429 06/29/2017 ESI ACQUISITIONS INC 0.00 3,305.00 3,305.00 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 16 Current Date: 07/11/2017 Report: CK -AGENDA -REG -PORTRAIT -CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 15:32:57 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P82 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 6/13/2017 through 7/10/2017 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name 2!y Fire Amount AP 00381430 06/29/2017 FORD OF UPLAND INC 3,848.86 0.00 3,848.86 AP 00381431 06/29/2017 GENERATOR SERVICES CO 4,012.48 0.00 4,012.48 AP 00381432 06/29/2017 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 2,681.38 0.00 2,681.38 AP 00381433 06/29/2017 KME FIRE APPARATUS 0.00 11,557.09 11,557.09 AP 00381434 06/29/2017 LIMS AUTO INC 378.15 0.00 378.15 AP 00381436 06/29/2017 OFFICE DEPOT 4,146.03 258.74 4,404.77 *** AP 00381437 06/29/2017 ORKIN PEST CONTROL 363.84 0.00 363.84 AP 00381438 06/29/2017 SIMPLOT PARTNERS 2,056.95 0.00 2,056.95 AP 00381439 06/29/2017 SPINITAR 1,737.31 0.00 1,737.31 AP 00381440 06/29/2017 SUNRISE FORD 295.47 0.00 295.47 AP 00381441 06/29/2017 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS 1,788.27 0.00 1,788.27 AP 00381442 06/29/2017 VISTA PAINT 962.65 0.00 962.65 AP 00381443 07/05/2017 Camaval, Hector G 51.00 0.00 51.00 AP 00381444 07/05/2017 A & A AUTOMOTIVE AND TIRE INC. 394.24 0.00 394.24 AP 00381445 07/05/2017 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 2,333.45 0.00 2,333.45 AP 00381446 07/05/2017 ACTION AWARDS INC. 1,087.56 0.00 1,087.56 AP 00381447 07/05/2017 ALBERT GROVER & ASSOCIATES 4,000.00 0.00 4,000.00 AP 00381448 07/05/2017 ALLIANCE BUS LINES INC 1,372.93 0.00 1,372.93 AP 00381449 07/05/2017 ARMSTRONG GARDEN CENTERS INC. 119.52 0.00 119.52 AP 00381450 07/05/2017 ARROW TRAILER SUPPLIES INC 36.53 0.00 36.53 AP 00381451 07/05/2017 ART OF LIVING FOUNDATION 54.00 0.00 54.00 AP 00381452 07/05/2017 BRAUN BLAISING SMITH WYNNE P.C. 5,080.25 0.00 5,080.25 AP 00381453 07/05/2017 BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERVICES INC. 1,064.65 0.00 1,064.65 AP 00381454 07/05/2017 BUREAU VERITAS NORTH AMERICA INC 9,049.77 0.00 9,049.77 AP 00381455 07/05/2017 BUTSKO UTILITY DESIGN INC. 7,800.00 0.00 7,800.00 AP 00381456 07/05/2017 CANGA, SHARON 53.96 0.00 53.96 AP 00381457 07/05/2017 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 110.33 0.00 110.33 AP 00381458 07/05/2017 CENTENO, JASON 332.00 0.00 332.00 AP 00381459 07/05/2017 CHAMPION AWARDS AND SPECIALTIES 19.40 0.00 19.40 AP 00381460 07/05/2017 CINTAS CORPORATION #150 0.00 113.58 113.58 AP 00381461 07/05/2017 CL BUILDERS & DEVELOPMENT INC. 742.00 0.00 742.00 AP 00381462 07/05/2017 CLARK, KAREN 378.00 0.00 378.00 AP 00381463 07/05/2017 CLASSE PARTY RENTALS 22.89 0.00 22.89 AP 00381464 07/05/2017 CLOUGHESY, DONALD 0.00 320.00 320.00 AP 00381465 07/05/2017 CONCEPT POWDER COATING 450.00 0.00 450.00 AP 00381466 07/05/2017 COSTAR REALTY INFORMATION INC 1,332.06 0.00 1,332.06 AP 00381467 07/05/2017 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 2,761.09 0.00 2,761.09 AP 00381468 07/05/2017 DANCE TERRIFIC 1,277.50 0.00 1,277.50 AP 00381469 07/05/2017 DATA ARC LLC 14,441.15 0.00 14,441.15 AP 00381470 07/05/2017 DLIMAGING 1,777.36 0.00 1,777.36 AP 00381471 07/05/2017 DOG WASTE DEPOT 381.40 0.00 381.40 AP 00381472 07/05/2017 EDWARDSON, JESSICA 250.00 0.00 250.00 AP 00381473 07/05/2017 ELECNOR BELCO ELECTRIC INC 61,397.74 0.00 61,397.74 AP 00381474 07/05/2017 ENN GEE CORP. 4,175.00 0.00 4,175.00 AP 00381475 07/05/2017 EXECUTIVE AUTO DETAIL 680.00 0.00 680.00 AP 00381476 07/05/2017 FORTIN LAW GROUP 14,277.92 0.00 14,277.92 AP 00381478 07/05/2017 FRONTIER COMM 9,099.08 1,075.80 10,174.88*** User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 17 Current Date: 07/11/2017 Report: CK -AGENDA -PEG -PORTRAIT -CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 15:32:57 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P83 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Aswnda Check Register 6/13/2017 through 7/10/2017 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Citv Fire Amount AP 00381479 07/05/2017 FRONTIER FORD 0.00 154,100.45 154,100.45 AP 00381480 07/05/2017 G AND M BUSINESS INTERIORS 239.10 0.00 239.10 AP 00381481 07/05/2017 GEOGRAPHICS 2,252.78 0.00 2,252.78 AP 00381482 07/05/2017 GLOBALSTAR USA 95.79 0.00 95.79 AP 00381483 07/05/2017 GOOD YEAR TIRE AND RUBBER CO. 1,147.28 0.00 1,147.28 AP 00381484 07/05/2017 GRACIANO, TAMMIE 0.00 83.37 83.37 AP 00381485 07/05/2017 GRAINGER 237.72 0.00 237.72 AP 00381486 07/05/2017 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 1,467.82 0.00 1,467.82 AP 00381487 07/05/2017 GYROSCOPE INC 19,000.00 0.00 19,000.00 AP 00381488 07/05/2017 HERITAGE EDUCATION GROUP 150.00 0.00 150.00 AP 00381489 07/05/2017 HI WAY SAFETY INC 1,043.41 0.00 1,043.41 AP 00381490 07/05/2017 HOLLAND, BRANDIE 150.00 0.00 150.00 AP 00381491 07/05/2017 HOSE MAN INC 0.00 50.93 50.93 AP 00381492 07/05/2017 HUNTINGTON HARDWARE 485.03 0.00 485.03 AP 00381493 07/05/2017 INLAND VALLEY DANCE ACADEMY 2,076.00 0.00 2,076.00 AP 00381494 07/05/2017 J & D GUILLIAM CONSTRUCTION INC 2,160.00 0.00 2,160.00 AP 00381495 07/05/2017 JOHN BURR CYCLES INC 908.69 0.00 908.69 AP 00381496 07/05/2017 JOHNNY ALLEN TENNIS ACADEMY 642.60 0.00 642.60 AP 00381497 07/05/2017 JOHNSON MACHINERY COMPANY 0.00 889.14 889.14 AP 00381498 07/05/2017 KRESTLAKE, KELLY 18.00 0.00 18.00 AP 00381499 07/05/2017 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 770.00 1,628.00 2,398.00 *** AP 00381500 07/05/2017 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 3,590.00 0.00 3,590.00 AP 00381501 07/05/2017 LOS ANGELES ENGINEERING INC 23,687.94 0.00 23,687.94 AP 00381502 07/05/2017 LOS ANGELES FREIGHTLINER 0.00 385.08 385.08 AP 00381503 07/05/2017 MARIPOSA LANDSCAPES INC 62,131.98 0.00 62,131.98 AP 00381504 07/05/2017 MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL INC 9,590.00 0.00 9,590.00 AP 00381505 07/05/2017 MIDWEST TAPE 250.25 0.00 250.25 AP 00381506 07/05/2017 MIG 300.00 0.00 300.00 AP 00381507 07/05/2017 MIJAC ALARM COMPANY 29.00 0.00 29.00 AP 00381508 07/05/2017 MINUTEMAN PRESS 377.97 0.00 377.97 AP 00381509 07/05/2017 MITCHELL, REBECCA 17.14 0.00 17.14 AP 00381510 07/05/2017 MORRIS, DOUG 250.00 0.00 250.00 AP 00381511 07/05/2017 MORRIS, RICHARD 126.00 0.00 126.00 AP 00381512 07/05/2017 MOUNTAIN VIEW GLASS AND MIRROR INC 921.31 0.00 921.31 AP 00381513 07/05/2017 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 50.53 0.00 50.53 AP 00381514 07/05/2017 NEWCOMB ANDERSON MCCORMICK INC 784.00 616.00 1,400.00 *** AP 00381515 07/05/2017 OPARC 396.00 0.00 396.00 AP 00381516 07/05/2017 OPEN APPS INC 10,400.00 0.00 10,400.00 AP 00381517 07/05/2017 PACIFIC YOUTH SPORTS 1,287.00 0.00 1,287.00 AP 00381518 07/05/2017 PEPE'S TOWING SERVICE 160.00 0.00 160.00 AP 00381519 07/05/2017 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 517.24 0.00 517.24 AP 00381520 07/05/2017 PHOENIX GROUP INFORMATION SYSTEMS 3,413.53 0.00 3,413.53 AP 00381521 07/05/2017 PRECISION GYMNASTICS 3,274.39 0.00 3,274.39 AP 00381522 07/05/2017 PRESENTATION MEDIA INC 2,480.00 0.00 2,480.00 AP 00381523 07/05/2017 PRO -ACT INC 250.00 0.00 250.00 AP 00381524 07/05/2017 PRO -LINE INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS INC 1,413.68 0.00 1,413.68 AP 00381525 07/05/2017 PSA PRINT GROUP 127.15 0.00 127.15 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 18 Current Date: 07/11/2017 Report: CK -AGENDA -PEG -PORTRAIT -CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 15:32:57 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P84 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 6/13/2017 through 7/10/2017 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Citv Fire Amount AP 00381526 07/05/2017 PW GILLIBRAND INC 1,699.55 0.00 1,699.55 AP 00381527 07/05/2017 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 281.36 0.00 281.36 AP 00381528 07/05/2017 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FONTANA FAMILY YMCA 8,937.14 0.00 8,937.14 AP 00381529 07/05/2017 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 78.12 0.00 78.12 AP 00381530 07/05/2017 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 71,373.97 0.00 71,373.97 AP 00381531 07/05/2017 RODRIGUEZ INC, RY 0.00 230.50 230.50 AP 00381532 07/05/2017 ROYAL WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 0.00 367.97 367.97 AP 00381533 07/05/2017 SAFE -ENTRY TECHNICAL INC 0.00 2,653.04 2,653.04 AP 00381534 07/05/2017 SAN BERNARDINO CO AUDITOR CONT 7,969.50 0.00 7,969.50 AP 00381535 07/05/2017 SAN BERNARDINO, CITY OF 1,067.22 0.00 1,067.22 AP 00381536 07/05/2017 SCHAEFER, PAUL 184.88 0.00 184.88 AP 00381537 07/05/2017 SERPE, KRISTIN 80.00 0.00 80.00 AP 00381538 07/05/2017 SILVER & WRIGHT LLP 3,298.42 0.00 3,298.42 AP 00381539 07/05/2017 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 1,197.88 0.00 1,197.88 AP 00381540 07/05/2017 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 6,258.81 297.88 6,556.69 *** AP 00381541 07/05/2017 SOCIAL VOCATIONAL SERVICES 3,388.00 0.00 3,388.00 AP 00381542 07/05/2017 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 9,339.64 0.00 9,339.64 AP 00381543 07/05/2017 SOUTHERN COUNTIES LUBRICANTS LLC 0.00 5,142.70 5,142.70 AP 00381544 07/05/2017 SOUTHLAND SPORTS OFFICIALS 184.00 0.00 184.00 AP 00381545 07/05/2017 STERLING COFFEE SERVICE 1,762.78 0.00 1,762.78 AP 00381546 07/05/2017 STOTZ EQUIPMENT 81.64 0.00 81.64 AP 00381547 07/05/2017 SUPERION LLC 427.20 0.00 427.20 AP 00381548 07/05/2017 TERRA VISTA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 100.00 0.00 100.00 AP 00381549 07/05/2017 THOMSON REUTERS WEST PUBLISHING CORP 898.65 0.00 898.65 AP 00381550 07/05/2017 TOSCANO, PATRICIO 789.55 0.00 789.55 AP 00381551 07/05/2017 UNIVERSAL MARTIAL ARTS CENTERS 472.50 0.00 472.50 AP 00381552 07/05/2017 UPS 64.89 0.00 64.89 AP 00381553 07/05/2017 VALVERDE SCHOOL OF PERFORMING ARTS 11,689.00 0.00 11,689.00 AP 00381554 07/05/2017 VICTOR MEDICAL COMPANY 689.82 0.00 689.82 AP 00381555 07/05/2017 WEBBER, DEBORAH 32.75 0.00 32.75 AP 00381556 07/05/2017 WHITE HOUSE PHOTO INC 130.00 0.00 130.00 AP 00381557 07/05/2017 WILDLIFE LEARNING CENTER 1,220.00 0.00 1,220.00 AP 00381558 07/05/2017 YAMADA ENTERPRISES 24,447.53 0.00 24,447.53 AP 00381559 07/05/2017 YORK INDUSTRIES 947.12 0.00 947.12 AP 00381560 07/05/2017 ZOETIS US LLC 1,516.04 0.00 1,516.04 AP 00381561 07/05/2017 ZONES CORPORATE SOLUTIONS 0.00 6,182.35 6,182.35 AP 00381562 07/05/2017 3SI SECURITY SYSTEMS 1,080.00 0.00 1,080.00 AP 00381563 07/05/2017 ADDY, MARK 400.00 0.00 400.00 AP 00381564 07/05/2017 AFLAC GROUP INSURANCE 40.97 0.00 40.97 AP 00381565 07/05/2017 AGUILERA, ISAIAH 972.00 0.00 972.00 AP 00381566 07/05/2017 CAL PERS LONG TERM CARE 286.21 0.00 286.21 AP 00381567 07/05/2017 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 302.32 0.00 302.32 AP 00381568 07/05/2017 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 8.44 0.00 8.44 AP 00381569 07/05/2017 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 100.00 0.00 100.00 AP 00381570 07/05/2017 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 60.00 0.00 60.00 AP 00381571 07/05/2017 CFCA-EMS SECTION -SOUTHERN DIVISION 0.00 150.00 150.00 AP 00381572 07/05/2017 CITRUS BELT CHAPTER I.C.C. 15.00 0.00 15.00 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 19 Current Date: 07/11/2017 Report: CK -AGENDA -REG -PORTRAIT -CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 15:32:57 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P85 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 6/13/2017 through 7/10/2017 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Cltv Fire Amount AP 00381573 07/05/2017 CITRUS BELT CHAPTER I.C.C. 200.00 0.00 200.00 AP 00381574 07/05/2017 CRITERION PICTURES USA INC 2,480.00 0.00 2,480.00 AP 00381575 07/05/2017 DELTA DENTAL 1,415.44 0.00 1,415.44 AP 00381576 07/05/2017 DELTA DENTAL 40,470.33 0.00 40,470.33 AP 00381577 07/05/2017 DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 288.50 0.00 288.50 AP 00381578 07/05/2017 DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 1,883.86 0.00 1,883.86 AP 00381579 07/05/2017 DUPPER, PHILLIP 400.00 0.00 400.00 AP 00381580 07/05/2017 ENGSTROM, DANIEL 1,200.00 0.00 1,200.00 AP 00381581 07/05/2017 FOLKENS, KIM 400.00 0.00 400.00 AP 00381582 07/05/2017 FRONTIER COMM 1,015.33 0.00 1,015.33 AP 00381583 07/05/2017 GALE/CENGAGE LEARNING 16,807.79 0.00 16,807.79 AP 00381584 07/05/2017 GRAEBER, DIANNE 833.00 0.00 833.00 AP 00381585 07/05/2017 GRANT 1II, VINCENT 972.00 0.00 972.00 AP 00381586 07/05/2017 HUDSON AUDIO WORKS 3,000.00 0.00 3,000.00 AP 00381587 07/05/2017 IATSE NATIONAL HEALTH & WELFARE FUNDS 300.00 0.00 300.00 AP 00381588 07/05/2017 JOHNSON, CHEARICE 486.00 0.00 486.00 AP 00381589 07/05/2017 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INC 205,096.55 0.00 205,096.55 AP 00381590 07/05/2017 KERRY, DANIELLE 1,000.00 0.00 1,000.00 AP 00381591 07/05/2017 KONG, SOPHEAK 486.00 0.00 486.00 AP 00381592 07/05/2017 MANCHESTER GRAND HYATT SAN DIEGO 1,240.60 0.00 1,240.60 AP 00381593 07/05/2017 MANCHESTER GRAND HYATT SAN DIEGO 1,240.60 0.00 1,240.60 AP 00381594 07/05/2017 MANCHESTER GRAND HYATT SAN DIEGO 1,240.60 0.00 1,240.60 AP 00381595 07/05/2017 MANCHESTER GRAND HYATT SAN DIEGO 1,240.60 0.00 1,240.60 AP 00381596 07/05/2017 MANCHESTER GRAND HYATT SAN DIEGO 1,240.60 0.00 1,240.60 AP 00381597 07/05/2017 MANCHESTER GRAND HYATT SAN DIEGO 1,240.60 0.00 1,240.60 AP 00381598 07/05/2017 MANCHESTER GRAND HYATT SAN DIEGO 1,959.72 0.00 1,959.72 AP 00381599 07/05/2017 MANCHESTER GRAND HYATT SAN DIEGO 1,959.72 0.00 1,959.72 AP 00381600 07/05/2017 MANCHESTER GRAND HYATT SAN DIEGO 1,959.72 0.00 1,959.72 AP 00381601 07/05/2017 MANCHESTER GRAND HYATT SAN DIEGO 1,959.72 0.00 1,959.72 AP 00381602 07/05/2017 MANCHESTER GRAND HYATT SAN DIEGO 979.86 0.00 979.86 AP 00381603 07/05/2017 MANCHESTER GRAND HYATT SAN DIEGO 979.86 0.00 979.86 AP 00381604 07/05/2017 MANCHESTER GRAND HYATT SAN DIEGO 979.86 0.00 979.86 AP 00381605 07/05/2017 MANCHESTER GRAND HYATT SAN DIEGO 979.86 0.00 979.86 AP 00381606 07/05/2017 MMASC 85.00 0.00 85.00 AP 00381607 07/05/2017 MURGUTA, MARISELA 600.00 0.00 600.00 AP 00381608 07/05/2017 NEOPOST USA INC 266.93 0.00 266.93 AP 00381609 07/05/2017 NIMAKO, SOLOMON 972.00 0.00 972.00 AP 00381610 07/05/2017 PING, KAREN 275.00 0.00 275.00 AP 00381611 07/05/2017 PRE -PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 96.59 0.00 96.59 AP 00381612 07/05/2017 RAYENHARTZ, DAVID 400.00 0.00 400.00 AP 00381613 07/05/2017 SBPEA 957.19 0.00 957.19 AP 00381614 07/05/2017 SEYBERT, NICKALAUS 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00381615 07/05/2017 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 446.95 0.00 446.95 AP 00381616 07/05/2017 SIPHOMSAY, SID 486.00 0.00 486.00 AP 00381617 07/05/2017 STORAGE CONTAINER.COM 132.00 0.00 132.00 AP 00381618 07/05/2017 THEATRE C BOSTON COURT, THE 100.00 0.00 100.00 AP 00381619 07/05/2017 TOWN AND COUNTRY RESORT 1,072.65 0.00 1,072.65 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 20 Current Date: 07/11/2017 Report: CK -AGENDA -REG -PORTRAIT -CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 15:32:57 Total City: $5,696,998.81 Total Fire: $2,425,837.68 Grand Total: $8,122,836.49 Note: *** Check Number includes both City and Fire District expenditures User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 21 Current Date: 07/11/2017 Report: CK -AGENDA -REG -PORTRAIT -CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 15:32:57 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P86 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 6/13/2017 through 7/10/2017 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Citv Fire Amount AP 00381620 07/05/2017 UNITED SCENIC ARTISTS PENSION AND WELFARE FU 200.00 0.00 200.00 AP 00381621 07/05/2017 UNITED WAY 124.00 0.00 124.00 AP 00381622 07/05/2017 WILSON, RYAN 972.00 0.00 972.00 AP 00381623 07/05/2017 YERO, ART 486.00 0.00 486.00 AP 00381624 07/05/2017 YOUNG, MELINDA 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00381625 07/05/2017 ZAPATA, ALEX 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00381626 07/06/2017 CHAFFEY JNT UN HIGH SCHL DIST 5,990.61 0.00 5,990.61 AP 00381627 07/06/2017 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 241.16 534.92 776.08 *** AP 00381628 07/06/2017 NEWMAN, ARNIE 1,200.00 0.00 1,200.00 AP 00381629 07/06/2017 TOSCANO, PATRICIO 789.55 0.00 789.55 AP 00381630 07/06/2017 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 0.00 142.10 142.10 AP 00381631 07/06/2017 LN CURTIS AND SONS 0.00 25.81 25.81 AP 00381632 07/06/2017 OFFICE DEPOT 2,107.95 0.00 2,107.95 AP 00381633 07/06/2017 HAMPTON YOGA 1,044.00 0.00 1,044.00 Total City: $5,696,998.81 Total Fire: $2,425,837.68 Grand Total: $8,122,836.49 Note: *** Check Number includes both City and Fire District expenditures User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 21 Current Date: 07/11/2017 Report: CK -AGENDA -REG -PORTRAIT -CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 15:32:57 P87 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Electronic Debit Register June 1, 2017 -June 30, 2017 DATE DESCRIPTION CITY FIRE AMOUNT 6/1 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 592.04 592.04 6/2 AUTHNET GATEWAY BILLING CCD 96613508 63.40 63.40 6/2 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 487.00 487.00 6/2 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 112.47 112.47 6/5 WIRE TRANSFER - To RDASA RORF - Payment of Forest Invoice 305,314.00 305,314.00 6/5 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 781.30 781.30 6/5 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 105.79 105.79 6/7 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT - Child Support Payments 2,330.33 2,330.33 6/7 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT - Child Support Payments 4,254.29 4,254.29 6/7 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 117.18 117.18 6/7 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 79.03 79.03 6/8 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 4,562.73 4,562.73 6/8 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 234.62 234.62 6/9 CALPERS - City - Retirement Account Deposit 49,870.84 49,870.84 6/9 CALPERS - City - Retirement Account Deposit 190,742.67 190,742.67 6/9 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 1,878.86 1,878.86 6/9 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 2,183.63 2,183.63 6/9 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 5,989.11 5,989.11 6/9 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 6,393.36 6,393.36 6/9 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 6,885.17 6,885.17 6/9 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 106,977.59 106,977.59 6/9 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 1,445.23 1,445.23 6/12 WIRE TRANSFER - To California ISO 52,472.92 52,472.92 6/12 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 2,487.01 2,487.01 6/12 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 1,331.28 1,331.28 6/13 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 12.00 12.00 6/14 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 6,752.52 6,752.52 6/14 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 975.88 975.88 6/15 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 5,664.65 5,664.65 6/15 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 8,532.49 8,532.49 6/16 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 1,336.03 1,336.03 6/16 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 2,023.28 2,023.28 6/19 WIRE TRANSFER - To California ISO 2,013.69 2,013.69 6/19 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 1,844.27 1,844.27 6/20 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 606.82 606.82 6/20 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 772.53 772.53 6/21 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 1,229.72 1,229.72 6/21 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 595.20 595.20 6/22 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT - Child Support Payments 4,791.70 4,791.70 6/22 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 1,762.00 1,762.00 6/22 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 2,640.00 2,640.00 6/23 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT - Child Support Payments 2,330.33 2,330.33 6/23 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 396.21 396.21 6/23 Workers Comp- Fire Account Transfer 1,395.42 1,395.42 6/26 ANALYSIS DEFICIT - Bank Fee - June 2017 18,208.61 18,208.61 6/26 WIRE TRANSFER - To California ISO 14,654.83 14,654.83 6/26 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 2,767.90 2,767.90 6/27 CALPERS - City - Retirement Account Deposit 50,862.95 50,862.95 6/27 CALPERS - City - Retirement Account Deposit 187,929.53 187,929.53 6/27 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 1,587.13 1,587.13 6/27 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 2,150.03 2,150.03 6/27 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 5,989.10 5,989.10 6/27 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 6,393.36 6,393.36 6/27 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 6,885.17 6,885.17 6/27 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 106,977.60 106,977.60 6/27 WIRE TRANSFER - To Villa Pacifica Il, LP - Project Loan Draw #1 439,280.04 439,280.04 6/27 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 2,277.09 2,277.09 6/27 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 2,980.95 2,980.95 6/28 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 976.72 976.72 P88 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Electronic Debit Register June 1, 2017 - June 30, 2017 DATE DESCRIPTION CITY FIRE AMOUNT 6/28 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 804.71 804.71 6/29 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 3,987.66 3,987.66 6/29 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 833.03 833.03 6/30 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 732.13 732.13 6/30 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 95.00 95.00 $ 1,354,456.04 $ 295,284.09 GRANDTOTAL $ 1,649,740.13 m O) c O E U 0 L U c m O A m O d (i E 0 (� C = N O m U c 0M O •Q C O O O d Mal Q w Q w M .O. A M C! FO- 4 CO N O O M I M In cq 0 V W N V O N O — — O — N r LL7NMnO LO of V O Of M 01 p OI O N N O tG —Go LO vrMi u�i _ M T 0 W VO' � r- N n Ln o to V n o T cin utOi o a ao o (O N O cM+�N o ado m m N T o co O N m O M N N M P M N N M N O SOD O ao cc o 0 N o M c00 R Oct � c0 O1 Loco) W N 1[7 c`7 M V N L6 C6 M N Cl) O O V O O M O O 00 O O fp O O r o o 001 OMi O N M V cn N N (M M N r p .- i `1 0 O M co N 1 Cl) N T O a T T M T M It N O M n Go N Oc ~ N N c C c c r Q m M V L li 0 2 2 U c O= 7 d d E U) v ¢ co c O Gi E C Q Q m �i y y L O O m O C _ N Q CO N a C INO E m d m v m 7> C m 0 0 Q = O 0 F- 47- d Q m M U o > E 0 a� r w m m o a E m d m v E a C � N m w co L c `m M o o E > O >. m U r- rn 0 O ~ C O. u' y E C N E �'- 0 H � C � > a c a) n w c 0 o m 'o c'v ° Z--0 C O (O 0 N W c Qt w M M C O E N c m X r cn O y to Sc > O LL a c a O .LO t Cl. CD m E v � O U �—, d c CL 72 e E N N N p rn T E 3 > s 0 cn at 0 = to m c co O } M (OO :E v C -4 U i U H E y w E (n O> U a > C CD tqG1 > \ C tr 00O r- a r m N N W.0 IR N O) C C O) co 0 M T M m N 'It E t U CN p T N E O' Q W (O M >N C fa Cl) Cl) Chw (O 'C O W C M L y a 0 LL g co 0CDEL 3 0 C' U M ? N c H CD U > m m L ' N ~ N > C T N N C c O C O M yEU y o m0 m a" S U o N U E O N d V m y j vJ T p C (o N O U L 0: a •- m co E tD O o E ~ O n m O v)(A.m o C T y ID -0 U' cnr- CD 121 CC m} d d N U C C o W C > in3 = Z Ecn m0 to m E 41 u r •- m m m m m a� E 0o m c U Q W �Q> m H4; y N G Iml Lu C > , Qa P90 m m m r m to W O O N N N N N m n Of Of m r O O O O O N N N O O O d O O m M O O m T O M m M O = N Na NN N E N 0 0 O O O O O O O Nr tri OD Oi Oi ao f0 n m aD cci ri c c c m O m m 7 CD C O N V = ' N c O O N O NfON7 N O N = M - M NNNM i O d C O c M aON 0OtO aN 7NNf toN 0 mN 0Nt 0tao N Of W aN aN m tp ON 10 . m N m O r N O O O 0 m R IL O O O o 0 0 r� v L a' N G Iml Lu C > , Qa P90 N N N N N m N N N N N N N N N N m N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q m m m m r m to W O O N N N N N m n Of Of m r O O O O O N N N O O O �Mr O O m M O O m T O M m M NNNNN O N Na NN N N 0 0 O O O O O O O Nr tri OD Oi Oi ao f0 n m aD O a ri c c c m O m m M N N 0 c m m 0 m m U O O m o 0 0 m N N O m NO.O- NfON7 N O N N NNNM 0 2MrN > O c M aON 0OtO aN 7NNf toN 0 mN 0Nt 0tao N Of W aN aN m tp ON 10 . m N m O r N dl M O O O O O O OO 0 0 O O O o 0 0 O O O 0 0 O c O p o 0 0 0 o o c 0 Ct O O o �I o v m rn m N T m M M Of rn m v m r N O M m N T N N r m 0 m O O O O O LL m OI ci. rn m cr c Oc m rn� m� me crn m O m m wv O mmm O 0 a c c c N N N M .- N M M W m M O O m m r r v M m � m M n .- N m O N M h m Vi m M M I i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � 0 0 0 0 0 0 a m m O N m m M 0 O O O 0 0 0 M N M O m N O m M O o 0 O O O O O c O N N N N N N N N N N rI, Cf I Oi O M O R m m OT O M M N M m o m M m M m m c O .9 m m N O O r O W m N O m m 00 m 0 C� m N m m m 0 O m m N M M m N OR O N O O m n m 0 0 0 0 LO n O _ \ N f` CO tD f7 u7 O N N f7 M N N N O a '7 R to t0 N N (` to a m N N N M c W N N N (\ M M m r r N N a a c t0 N N N N N m N N N N N N N N N N m N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q m O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O m O O O O O OO O O O r 01 O O m M O O m T O M m M m m r M m M m m M O O M N O N O O c7 m N O m m O r m O m m N m m m 0 N M M m N m O m m O N O O tri OD Oi Oi ao f0 n m aD tV mui ri c c c m O a mm m M M tT r n m m m m OI r: M m m to 0 0 m r m m c r r O n m N r m e n r m m O M m m M N O O O m o 0 0 m N N O m O m m 0 0 O O O O O c O M M- O M n '- M r 0 O O m O O O O N N O M O c M m 0 0 O O O 0 0 O m m O M n M M O O O m 0 0 0 . m N m O r N O n M O O O O O O O N O M M M M O M m m 0 0 C m e Of c to 0 0 o a c 0 0 0 0 m O O O m m O O m fp M N M O O N O m O O m Of o 0 0 0 o o c 0 Ct O O o 0 0 m 0 O O n O m m O m M Of m m 0 O O m O O O O N m O O N O m c m O O O O O O O c O m OI ci. m m m O O O Cl (3 N G m m O O m O O O O o c m C C 0 m m 0 0 0 W (31 0 O O C 0 0 0 O Of m m O O O O O O O O O m C O O m m O O N N lh " c c c N N N M (M c N M M c+) N M .- r N fD c c M N M r M M M I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O 0 0 0 O O O O O O 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O m 0 0 0 O O O O O r m M O O O n O m 0 O O O m 0 0 O O O O O O O O c O O O O m 0 o O m N OD m tri ori m ui fV f0 tri OD Oi Oi ao f0 n m aD tV mui ri c c c m O a mm m M M tT r n m m m m OI r: M m m to 0 0 m r m m c r r O n m N r m e n r W m N O m 0 r m m N_ M N m M C m m O M m n M m m M m M r m o m r M N m m N O m 1n m c O m m m m v r m M m m a Ot N N m OL rn ao rn o rn rn r O O T M Ot vi 't m m m o rn m m m m o m O C 01 c m G G O Ol Cn O O O 0 m m o 0] m m O m o C m tT ml o m m m M to Ot N N cn 0 0 tri 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o m m OI Oi o 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O M O m m m m O O O O O O O 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 O O O O M t•7 O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 O o 0 0 0 0 O m 00 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 O o 0 O O O O M M M M O O o 0 0 0 0 O O o 0 0 C C 0 0 0 C CL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C C 0 0 0 0 CL C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 Ct Ct 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ct 0 C 0 W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 tri 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o m m OI Oi o 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O M O m m 0 0 0 O O m 0 0 0 0 0 0 m O O O O O 0 0 0 O O O 0 Orn O O m O o 0 0 0 0 O O O O m O 0 o m m O O N N y W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W mQ Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q m M N M m V c N c N M '- M M M LL cn io t+> cn cn co co co c7 co io to c+7 to to m cn M M M O7 t+1 (7 lh M t7 c+] M M M t+1 rr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N t0 m a 0 f7 M O1 n f7 u7 r a t0 r O O st r a m n m 0 0 0 0 LO n O _ \ N f` CO tD f7 u7 O N N f7 M N N N O a '7 R to t0 N N (` to a m N N N M c W N N N (\ M M m r r N N a a c t0 O O O O 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 O O o O o 0 O O O 0 0 0 O O O o N O LOO 1'1 M Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Q Q Q a Q a Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q F H t �_ H F F t h F F F F F L m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m O D o D O O D o c D D O o c O o Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z W m m m m m W m W m m m W m m m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O U U O U 0 O U U 00 0 00 U O U J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J tai LLtaiLL LLLLLL LLLLLL LLLLLL LLLL LL 2222225222222202 QJ QJ QJ QJ qJ J QJ QJ QJ QJ QJ QJ QJ QJ QJ QJ QJ QJ QJ JQ qJ qJ QJ qJ QJ QJ qJ QJ QJ QJ QJ QJ W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W U- U- U. w w U- til to to w w Iu uW 11.I w w W to U- t11 w til W U- w 111 w w LL w w w LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL C O O. 7 O U 0 N r O R O M O r O CO CO M0 c N CO O m OI CO e m n c m 0 m y N N M M c m N M M c c n n r m m o V r m m v m m CO m m m m m m m m m m m m O O c m m m m r r r m CO m m to m m m m m m m m m m U r U) y o � T V n C o Q U, m m 01 N N m m M m m m rn I� r O M In In Of m M N CO m m N a m N c a: rn v}} m N J Cl Y 2 F U � U J m y (9 Y LY W m m m C7 C7 2 }} m F C7 W O Cr M' O 0 m U 1Q1 U U U U a w LL LL LL 0 U (7 5 2 2 2 m O N< '0 f0O m w m T m Q Qm m m m y W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W mQ Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Mm M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 41 M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M 0 LL cn io t+> cn cn co co co c7 co io to c+7 to to m cn M M M O7 t+1 (7 lh M t7 c+] M M M t+1 rr d CA N N O N O O N N N N N N N N r t0 lD m O m m O O m m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Co 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N N NN N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O O to P, (D Q m LD D rn m t� LN o (D n 0)m D LD (D O a 00 m M M N N N N N N N N N N N N O Q N N N N N N co �- N N tD t� O D R a a1- N fD LD t� a)1n r N N O O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 .- O a 0 0 O O N N to V V m O M r O V v O LO Cl) y co m r O M M co N N LD N M m to tD CO ( O CO /D R m c f0 N r n LO LN V i n V -q COI O O m V V to W m fO r V r LD O N N M 00 r'- co m N N t0 m r O O O o O O O O O O O LN o M o O n 0 V O O O O o 0 o O O 0 0 OLN LN N Ln O O C N N N R LN O LN Ln O O O O N O N O N N O Lti O O N N N /D .- m t0 r 0 O O r M M� n N M N D N V I � m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m a Q Q ¢ a a Q Q Q a a a a Q a ¢ Q a ¢ Q Q a a a ¢ Q Q Q coo o 0 o 000 o o LN LN o o O N o 0 0 0 O o o c o o O 0 0 0 0 0 LN UN 0 0 O O N N N N O n o V o 0 O O LN O tN N O LN N O LN O O N N N t0 m (O r 0 O oD n N M V n tN M N O N O o O 00 O 00 O O O O to O O w O 0 co O 00 O 00 O LD O o N 0 0 0 O o 0 0 0 0 O r o O V O O o 0 C O O O N O o O G o N 0 0 0 O o 0 O O O 0 w O O M 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 M o O O 00 o 00 0 0 0 0 r 0 0 0 O O M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 h O O T O O m C C C 0 0 0 0 LN o o LO O O O O o 0 C C C O N O o N O O r0 00 O 00 O w O O 00 O N0 0 00 O 00 O N O O to O 00 O 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 00 0 m o 0 00 0 00 o m O O co O O m O 00 O O O O v O O 0 O O m In O LO Ln O O o O m O O co M M M M M IN M fo V M M V M V M V N C7 N V V V C6 v v V N 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O o 0 O O O 0 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 O O O O co O O O 0 0 0 O O O O N O O O O O O Ln O N O O o 0 O O O O m r m Ow w O M w w O w N N V N o r O r LN to V co v co N O tC O r n O In N r O n w O N LN 0 fo O In V V to n t0 tN O to V m r N n tD tO tD LN LN m r1i V O V to m m m V n O c N;; r m O to O v N N o w w O M 0O w O O n N M m m o m LN n O N O m r LN O w N m O r Oft w w m O m co m co n co N r M LN n co v om m m m m m o m v m m v o m m Lig m v v m m m m m o) co H M N V N N N V N O M M N M M N V N M M N M M M o7 M M M M N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 O O O O O 0 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O o C 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M to 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o to 0 o to 0 0 oto o Ln Ln o 0 0 0 0 0 o mO M M O M M M LN M 0 v M M V M y M 0 N V M N V v V V V v v 'tf N O w o fD m tD w r r r n r r r N M M v 0 0 0 m w w wow 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N D o n n tD LO fD O OD n Ln m (� LN O M V h m 0 LD Ln I'No V l0 co t\ t`7 N N N N O t` N N N N N N O L` N O N N M N N N M 'T N N O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 O O O O O a O O O 5-, Z-. 0 0 0 O a m m m m m m m m a m m m m x x x x Of x x x x x x x x x 000 O 00 000 O 00 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 o U o U coo 000 000 000 00 o o o O O O O O O O O O O O Z Zzz z z Z z z z z z Z Z 20 y y� N w w 0 w c� y V1 N U) V) lO v7 y y V) N N N (n u) En V1 z z z z z z z z z z z z z z a a Q¢ a Q Q a Q a a Q¢¢ 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 F F F F F F F F F F F J J J J J J J J J J J J J J W W W W W W W W W W W W W W J J J J J J J J J J J J J J g F F -F F F F F- F F- F F- F F- F- 000 000 000 O 00 0 0¢ a a a a a a a a a a¢ Q Q x x x x x x x x x x x x x x Z Z Z Z Z z z z z z Z z z z QJ QJ QJ QJ QJ qJ qJ QJ QJ qJ qJ JQ QJ QJ QJ qJ QJ qJ QJ QJ QJ QJ QJ QJ QJ QJ qJ qJ w w¢ ¢ w¢ w w¢ ¢ w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W 0 0 W W O 0 W 0 W W 0 0 0 W 0 0 0 W W W O O D 0 W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL c 0 CL 0 U _ _ r O co nN M m N n m m Uo V LO Ln M V co O o M LN m O M M V LN LN LN tO r r r LD O l0 CC)N M O m N N N V LN N O Ln to tO tD LD O to O Co fD (D fD tO f0 LO fD LN O LN N N tO tD fD to LO tD tD tD to Vl N T V C d m N n M n r CO N V O CD r Lo cO n N Co N LO M O r V M O Q >> > m m N m N LL Y¢ CD x } a N 0 LN o LL 2 0 to Lo u)} LL >> m> J> > co N N w U(Q y Ox 2 V O co co m m m Q Q a m m m CO Co o O O N O N N M M M o m M y 0 C7 O C7 Q U CD 0 0 0 C7 0 0 a C7 U C9 U 0 C7 0 0 0 U 0 C7 0 0 V V V V V V V V V V V V V V LD CO W LN CO LN (D CO CO CO CO LN tD CO O M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M LL m m m m m to t) m m m to c,) to m io ro m t,) t,) to th ro mi+) , m m m P91 o Q M N U C = d a� O CL d E o a Cl! C Q 2 a N N O m N O .0 M C OO d c QI wo ' LO N LO G, 6' O O 0 ;R �. IL V O a a' N O N O O N N N N N N N N r t0 lD m O m m O O m m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Co 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N N NN N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O O to P, (D Q m LD D rn m t� LN o (D n 0)m D LD (D O a 00 m M M N N N N N N N N N N N N O Q N N N N N N co �- N N tD t� O D R a a1- N fD LD t� a)1n r N N O O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 .- O a 0 0 O O N N to V V m O M r O V v O LO Cl) y co m r O M M co N N LD N M m to tD CO ( O CO /D R m c f0 N r n LO LN V i n V -q COI O O m V V to W m fO r V r LD O N N M 00 r'- co m N N t0 m r O O O o O O O O O O O LN o M o O n 0 V O O O O o 0 o O O 0 0 OLN LN N Ln O O C N N N R LN O LN Ln O O O O N O N O N N O Lti O O N N N /D .- m t0 r 0 O O r M M� n N M N D N V I � m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m a Q Q ¢ a a Q Q Q a a a a Q a ¢ Q a ¢ Q Q a a a ¢ Q Q Q coo o 0 o 000 o o LN LN o o O N o 0 0 0 O o o c o o O 0 0 0 0 0 LN UN 0 0 O O N N N N O n o V o 0 O O LN O tN N O LN N O LN O O N N N t0 m (O r 0 O oD n N M V n tN M N O N O o O 00 O 00 O O O O to O O w O 0 co O 00 O 00 O LD O o N 0 0 0 O o 0 0 0 0 O r o O V O O o 0 C O O O N O o O G o N 0 0 0 O o 0 O O O 0 w O O M 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 M o O O 00 o 00 0 0 0 0 r 0 0 0 O O M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 h O O T O O m C C C 0 0 0 0 LN o o LO O O O O o 0 C C C O N O o N O O r0 00 O 00 O w O O 00 O N0 0 00 O 00 O N O O to O 00 O 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 00 0 m o 0 00 0 00 o m O O co O O m O 00 O O O O v O O 0 O O m In O LO Ln O O o O m O O co M M M M M IN M fo V M M V M V M V N C7 N V V V C6 v v V N 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O o 0 O O O 0 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 O O O O co O O O 0 0 0 O O O O N O O O O O O Ln O N O O o 0 O O O O m r m Ow w O M w w O w N N V N o r O r LN to V co v co N O tC O r n O In N r O n w O N LN 0 fo O In V V to n t0 tN O to V m r N n tD tO tD LN LN m r1i V O V to m m m V n O c N;; r m O to O v N N o w w O M 0O w O O n N M m m o m LN n O N O m r LN O w N m O r Oft w w m O m co m co n co N r M LN n co v om m m m m m o m v m m v o m m Lig m v v m m m m m o) co H M N V N N N V N O M M N M M N V N M M N M M M o7 M M M M N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 O O O O O 0 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O o C 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M to 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o to 0 o to 0 0 oto o Ln Ln o 0 0 0 0 0 o mO M M O M M M LN M 0 v M M V M y M 0 N V M N V v V V V v v 'tf N O w o fD m tD w r r r n r r r N M M v 0 0 0 m w w wow 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N D o n n tD LO fD O OD n Ln m (� LN O M V h m 0 LD Ln I'No V l0 co t\ t`7 N N N N O t` N N N N N N O L` N O N N M N N N M 'T N N O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 O O O O O a O O O 5-, Z-. 0 0 0 O a m m m m m m m m a m m m m x x x x Of x x x x x x x x x 000 O 00 000 O 00 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 o U o U coo 000 000 000 00 o o o O O O O O O O O O O O Z Zzz z z Z z z z z z Z Z 20 y y� N w w 0 w c� y V1 N U) V) lO v7 y y V) N N N (n u) En V1 z z z z z z z z z z z z z z a a Q¢ a Q Q a Q a a Q¢¢ 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 F F F F F F F F F F F J J J J J J J J J J J J J J W W W W W W W W W W W W W W J J J J J J J J J J J J J J g F F -F F F F F- F F- F F- F F- F- 000 000 000 O 00 0 0¢ a a a a a a a a a a¢ Q Q x x x x x x x x x x x x x x Z Z Z Z Z z z z z z Z z z z QJ QJ QJ QJ QJ qJ qJ QJ QJ qJ qJ JQ QJ QJ QJ qJ QJ qJ QJ QJ QJ QJ QJ QJ QJ QJ qJ qJ w w¢ ¢ w¢ w w¢ ¢ w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W 0 0 W W O 0 W 0 W W 0 0 0 W 0 0 0 W W W O O D 0 W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL c 0 CL 0 U _ _ r O co nN M m N n m m Uo V LO Ln M V co O o M LN m O M M V LN LN LN tO r r r LD O l0 CC)N M O m N N N V LN N O Ln to tO tD LD O to O Co fD (D fD tO f0 LO fD LN O LN N N tO tD fD to LO tD tD tD to Vl N T V C d m N n M n r CO N V O CD r Lo cO n N Co N LO M O r V M O Q >> > m m N m N LL Y¢ CD x } a N 0 LN o LL 2 0 to Lo u)} LL >> m> J> > co N N w U(Q y Ox 2 V O co co m m m Q Q a m m m CO Co o O O N O N N M M M o m M y 0 C7 O C7 Q U CD 0 0 0 C7 0 0 a C7 U C9 U 0 C7 0 0 0 U 0 C7 0 0 V V V V V V V V V V V V V V LD CO W LN CO LN (D CO CO CO CO LN tD CO O M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M LL m m m m m to t) m m m to c,) to m io ro m t,) t,) to th ro mi+) , m m m P91 o Q M N O LOD W v O O 0 0 O LO to N pO O O 0 Ln O{CD p C Or7 m v O O 0 CD0 ui co 1 o 0 co 0 M o M o 0 0 o N w 0 z U x C F- C 7 O O a' a > > � y c 0 CL m 0 Lo U � H d 7 U d U) Lo m 7 00 H O N 41, N F- am U o a� m CL o a Cl! C Q 2 a N N N CR r C4 I r m QI N LO O LOD W v O O 0 0 O LO to N pO O O 0 Ln O{CD p C Or7 m v O O 0 CD0 ui co 1 o 0 co 0 M o M o 0 0 o N w 0 z U x C F- C 7 O O a' a > > � y c 0 CL m 0 Lo U � H d 7 U d U) Lo m 7 00 H O N 41, N F- am M d m 10 a p2 ♦. R cn m 0 2 C E N 0A N N E W N N N V >r ' 7 tm C O > V = N A O to too a W) m a 0 m a 0 0 �O Q O M co N O Ln r 0 0 0 0 ;R a I-- Cl) to v a IL O O r0Cl)p ad m N O O N u7 O 0 m N m y m Q O CL H U R M 'r M )a m O O O O O O N N N N N N tD m i!) Of m O NN N N C200000 isM 0 0 V U N cli U) r z ui J W w C) LLI a 0 W }} Q O 0 Z F V C07 a ui L) O Z 0 J J g m m O d Z Q} W H H y LU LU Im ra z w Z Q � F 0 fA y Q ZLL LL = =O ¢ Q Q z M U z 0 0 0 O O a a ) > C m) C Y N 4) m d C U m l7 O O Of 0 co a J m' Q .0 o N o o v U U M v m r- M M A C w o Cl) m m m a U) mCDr- MM M CD W) V Z c') O H O a CL w 0 L) m u) W 0 a' aa. x U =m Q U 2-t O a U) fq cow v n m � m to d 0 O Z 0 ca M C m C, M m a. m r rn U o Lo co a M CD �0 N co N d) r m h O m O m N N N N N N N N N N N N N m co m o v v W) m a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O M co N O Ln r N v N m O I-- Cl) O N h O Cl) m O O r0Cl)p m N O O N u7 O 0 m N m y N Cl) N et COC', 0 I m n O CC%l O I N N O N N I a Q Q Q Q Q I Q Q @ al O N m 0 O O O m 0 O N Q1 O H O M n O O O m of O O OR n R )C1O m 0) N N N R O O m )n O m m m N 0 O ui h M O M M M O O O N LO h m m O O m to O 0) m O m m to W! O N0 a) a) O N m O O" m m m O "' O N v a N N o O m o N S VL O O C) O 43 m M ())0 of WI O a) O N N M— 1n R h R M )a M O O O O O O O O 00 O v v 0 o m o O O m O o 0 0 L6 h m O 0 O O O CO) O N m O N h R N r r- IT Cl) )n M V O O O m N � a) to O to O h 04 v a N N oo m o m N u7 VL O o 1 a) a1 0) c of )() O )n H N N fM R< N r R M LO M r 0 0 0000 0 0 cc, 0 000 0 0 v a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 90 0 n vi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 )n )n R ao o0 C 0 o 0 0 0 0 O O 0 o c a ' 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 C 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a v N N o o m o N u7 V O 0 0 O O to j O O O O m 0 N N M r w L6 N L6 M N M R M 'r M )a m O O O O O O N N N N N N tD m i!) Of m O NN N N C200000 isM 0 0 V U N cli U) r z ui J W w C) LLI a 0 W }} Q O 0 Z F V C07 a ui L) O Z 0 J J g m m O d Z Q} W H H y LU LU Im ra z w Z Q � F 0 fA y Q ZLL LL = =O ¢ Q Q z M U z 0 0 0 O O a a ) > C m) C Y N 4) m d C U m l7 O O Of 0 co a J m' Q .0 o N o o v U U M v m r- M M A C w o Cl) m m m a U) mCDr- MM M CD W) V Z c') O H O a CL w 0 L) m u) W 0 a' aa. x U =m Q U 2-t O a U) fq cow v n m � m to d 0 O Z 0 ca M C m C, M m a. m r rn U o Lo co a M CD �0 N co N d« « K U) m d 2 � N C C 0 t Y y N M 8 m N m � V c e� a S d M co N m d 2 � N C C 0 t d y N m N — � V c e� a S d M C 0 p = --) r m 0 L ,a° IL and ro (� a' 0 O O M a) m m N M d 1�/ � N C C m d HE m N d � C m d Q r m L H m 9k U C E � N d C . d }P i— Q ri co a O m > O LLi g o 0- m a �� a V M h O 000 O N C N co W 1'f O 000 T OND m OOf 000 O N r! � ' 0 N M It Cl) N N N N i O O O O 00 O O O O O O O O CO 1O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O 0 O 00 O 0 O O O 0 0 O O O I0; T O CpD O O O O 'NO =' tW N LQ pO N N N N LO W) N N 1 co O N O O O O O O O O O N N O O N N N ra O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O LO O n N N tNp O O O O N O O r W O O O m Vi Cl! 0 M t0 O N 7 O O m LO 0 0 0 p N co eeep N O d 0 O O O) N O O to r W C ♦� CD co M M m v M r Q � M C. ~ v IM i O Cat rrrr rn r O •; � V G N N N N N N N C ON N N N O O O O O O O co w jL+N O O OD O OO 0 0 � /y r O O to N O O O) O) �r y� 0] ao O O 01 f0 r N � .0- O V N C i a a a: m m m O O O U U U U F Y U' U' 0 CO D z Y Y ,, W LL H m m 2 2 i O LU m 0 0 O Z 0 0 0 U E z �g 0 0 0 0 O O '.3 9 to Y 9 2 i `S 1 E L o LL x x x x x o o E z y U o o D a E a a ~ d T Q N QJ aJ QJ QJ QJ QJ W W W W W W y v) fn z N ui U- y N O of t U OJ 0 0 T Q C lL lL LL LL LL LL « U O C O #O C C CL CC Eu.. o oa o m cf90 c°Dc Q 0 °n° (j I y N N C o C r 01 r W M �/% 12 Q 0 Q m 2> > vii Z` C w C. O LL x rn m m m m a 'v C-4 O m CL io o d w r Q a 0 0 N N o Cl) C. O V r�'i V � v) 7 n `p o } V V ` v J to u. m mMm c,)m a cnU m C Y U % N U CD U O U O Q U U M M S 0 V M = O O O z a } v c U U) 0 O u) L) m H U) D m O o Q U co �r LL P95 0 e 0 0 0 c 0 o 0 M o� O O O O O o� O M N r O N r r O m N r ao 0 M 00 r e 10 M N r 0 0-0 0 0 0 c 0 o 0 O O O O O O O M N O� O N a� LO v aD M s E2 m a) N i r O 2 N r co P96 LO LO O co Cl) Q1 LO LD m 0 co LO N ca ro P97 y N N O M LO O V O M D) U) O Ci L+p] R cM0 r07 z z z z r-o(DC7 U d N M M M M M M o (qri O OM a O O U) LO LO U1 r M m cD N N O) O LO co" co O M M V O O CT N N U U U) U) V M O •= •- a C's C6C O) V M n ro ro ro N ro ro ro ro M M A a N N u') a0 O M N U � LL LL LL LL LL LL r LL LL LL LL LL CMN- E N m Y Y Y a) a) a) m a) a) Y Y Y Y Y Y a) a) Y Y Y Y d9 69 Efl (fi VY EA EA EA WCUCD o } C C C C C C o C C C C wwwom C C C C C O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O LO O N U LO CP oCO � N ca ro P97 y N o 7 Lp m D) o m E z z z Z Z Z z Z Z z z z z Z Z Z U d m T M M M M M M M M M M E 4 O OM a L w O) O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O N N 0 0 N Z 0 co Q 3 cc � O 0 LL N N N N N N N N U U O a v v v m •= •- a ro ro ro ro ro v -0-C) -o 'o ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro C a) LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL E N m Y Y Y a) a) a) m a) a) Y Y Y Y Y Y a) a) Y Y Y Y a) a) a) a) a) Y Y Y Y Y N C m O W La La N La N N @ m WCUCD o C 9 C C C C C C C o C C C C wwwom C C C C C c d O p C) 0 C) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q V M M CO Cl) co Cl) m c0 ao c0 co W ao c0 co LD co co c0 co ao la V Q 01 L- )z r ;z ;z iz Ln L;) U) LO U) Ln Lo CD LO LOO UO) M Cl) ccn co (n U O co to cD (D LD O O LD co LO 0 LOO v ccoo DDo 000 ccoo 000 LL r v v v v c N F 01 = 0 3 c E Lo U E v E r > w V L C Lo D c m o E 0 2 TL y U A c U L O LL w c c mQ LL E LL ro E ro ro c a) v m a) - c y E c LLC LL LL C c a la ro Lo LL c d ro N C ro L O. ro O C N C m a LL ll U a) N o LL O c d F O X c LL H Li N N 2 V LL O [a LL 2 c (9 m C LL E U Z CL m ro a) C 7 ro w U Ln m c> a) D N U c n ac), U G) U () E Emm �¢Uomov)i o mtY�) c a o 0 v o 0 o ¢ m cr m a o o y rn o 2 E ) lCa Q LL LL LL LL ar a) C N N N y N '- a a) a) y N LO O N U LO CP oCO � N ca ro P97 y N o 7 Lp m D) o m E LLJ a) o E s Z > > c U O o O La a N D E E 4 O OM a Z; O M N o N h O N 0 0 N Z 0 co Q 3 0 U O 0 LL U U LO CP oCO � P97 O O o) Lp co Op N C O (D N N [n �j c c c c c c c LL LL LL LL LL LL LL Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N c N c c c c m 2 2 2 2 2 2 C) 0 ) 0 0 0 0 rn rn 00) 0) 0) 0)0 O OO) O m m C) C) 0 0 0 0 0 oo co O O co co co V V V V V V V 'O 7 LL a) c c c U Cc 7 7 C c LLLL LL O (n ro LL N 7 a) N , H LL o LL 2 .� 2 E m *0 a) U N a) a o U m m m M m LL E E X X K to N R r (N7 00 n O M o �� O co Cl) co m r� N n V cD n Om N N M LO 00� r� °� �� C6 P.: o6 00 04 1 C6 C6 P98 d Nr LO m m U N N N N co M N N M M E9 Efl Efl EA EA b9 fA EA EA E19 ti9 'DI o 0 o 0 o C� o O 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q Q Q Q Q Q Q ¢ Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q to z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z 0 u7 c0 t0 c0 c0 u7 c0 N u7 N t2 2 t0 c0 M t0 c0 l2 M t0 t0 M t0 l0 N an MN M-4 O�I N O O O O N N N N N OOOOO N N N N N O O O O O N N N N N O O O O O N N N N N O o O OO O o O O O OO o OM N N N N N OOOM Om O 7 Ll co M co M`[ r` i n n Cl)M coM \ M M 'C C b 'D b b C C C C b b b b b C C C 'D b b b b b b b b b b b b b b w C 7 7 7 7 7 C C 7 7 7 7 7 C C C C C 7 7 7 7 7 C C C C C 7 7 7 C C C C C O LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL 7 7 LL LL LL LL LL 7 7 7 7 7 LL LL LL LL LL N G1 d N N N N N Ol N N Cl N Ul G7 Ul Ol N U7 Ul N U7 CI -6Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y c0 (0 c0 t0 (0 c0 c0 c0 t0 M M c0 c0 t0 t0 c0 W M t0 t0 W M c0 t0 t0 T tU T T T T N N NN T T T T T N N N N N T T T T T N T T T T T T T T T T C C C C C C C C C C N N N N C C C C C N N N N N C C C C C N N N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O c C C C C C O O O O O CC 7 n O O N M 7 O O O O O O N Cl) V O O O O O O N M V O O O O O O N CO v O O O o O O N M v lU tJl O N N N N N O O O O O M M M M M O O O O O V V V 7 V O O O O O to M to to Lo O O O O O to co co co cD Q U U V R V V O O O O O V 'r '7 V V O O O O O V V R V V VQ N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N to CD O O tD O c0 O tD tD w CD CD O to CD CD tz h n n co co co co co O L ~ O CD O cD cD N 3 01 x 0 c E } } } } } o V d L 0 (D U E o Q N ¢ ¢ Q 03 N D d LLo o ? 0 ` Cl CD C)tc o 0 o cn -` N N N N cli5 a" M p 0 U U U U L H ? to to to to to Z U U 70 U N N N O O E LL D Q N N E Z' u Q U m O C C m C_ rn b C rn b b b O CO tt7 C E 7 7 O C ED O C 7 O C 7 b 7 E E 7 U LL LL C v LL LL C m li LL- b m li LL b ED m LL LL b y E N 7 N b c 7 7 N b E 7 x b c 7 7 x b c 7 O x C !n V ? tU LL V - C N LL U C N LL O F C N LL Ci O C 0 LL f G 0 0 LL> 01 L O Li m L 0 7 E ro IO LL o 7 E to ca LL o 7 E m LL a y N N C 0 C y N N C N y N L Z N C n N L N Z N O' N L f9 Z Q O lti d O N C N Q O lU C N O_ O E N C C c0 O. O N C N C O' N N d t0 U LYcnmam mEnmatz LYcnmatr �cnmam n o w mcnmam N ,O OJe C C C C A Q m m m m CC m m N CO C O O O .d, > j C O C O C O M > > > to 0 N Ll Y y c0 E a � lU i0 C (U O O O. Q O U to � h m C o Lit U) E y d 2 N lC0 U m O 7 U 0 LU to F=- m c cn a`) Q Y C U) g ¢ � U r. O O O O p Q N cp _Z 41 l0 p O O0 C) O O Ll C C NC) N N N Z Z Z Z Z LLL LL 0 O U) U U U U LL U /*6) 1 < < < < < � z z 2 2 2 £ \ \ C) §§§CO IL CO i » » $ 7 $ \//// ) \ \ k k \ to 2 f\Cl) , 'Il - P99 CD 0 \§ ) \ \ \ j ae / ff o� u. / o= e m o r_. � LL §k} m 42 k CDo §f] \ /*6) 1 < < < < < � z z 2 2 2 £ \ \ C) §§§CO IL CO i » » $ 7 $ \//// ) \ \ k k \ f\Cl) 'Il - 0 ) \ \ \ j / I / o= e m o LL §k} m 42 §f] \ \ 0 \ § n /§2 a 2° j \\ _ i/ § % 2 o D = t;� f Z3 b \ E [ LL� # 0 cc k } 2 § = 7 § ) $ ) / 7 c / \ 0 \ Of m= a w E / & 2 2 m « � ° E \ )� ) ® a § \ § % « / ) ® L cc \ ) a E 2 2 Lu § \ ) E E$ ® 3 kEn } E E c « o o® §§ CD - ) &§ ) ) / L) P100 DATE: July 19, 2017 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager w i INITIATED BY: Candyce Burnett, City Planner �11�"- Tom Grahn, Associate Planner STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE AMENDMENT NO. 003 AUTHORIZING AN INCREASE TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT (CO#15-082) TO SARGENT TOWN PLANNING, INC. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council approve an addendum to the Professional Services Agreement (PSA) with Sargent Town Planning, Inc. (STP), (CO -15-082), in an amount not to exceed $951,497.11, and to amend the Contract Scope of Services, for consultant services for the North Eastern Sphere Annexation Project (NESAP). BACKGROUND: In January 2015. the City Council reaffirmed the goal of pre -zoning and annexation for a 4.115 - acre portion of the City's sphere of influence and to obtain consultant services to assist City staff with the project The area to be annexed is currently within the jurisdiction of the County of San Bernardino. Generally located north of State Route 210 and east of Haven Avenue to the City's easterly boundary (Attachment 1 - Vicinity Map), the North Eastern Sphere Annexation Project consists of 4.115 acres of mostly undeveloped land and open space. On May 20. 2015, the City Council executed a PSA with STP for preparation of the NESAP. Project considerations for the annexation area envision- approximately 2,915 acres in the northern project area remaining as a conservation priority area. and approximately 1,200 acres generally located between Milliken Avenue and Day Creek Boulevard, and north of Banyan Avenue as a development priority area. The development priority area will include a vibrant residential "village", commercial core, civic areas, and conservation areas. On November 4, 2015, the City Council executed an addendum to the STP PSA. The addendum was necessary as the overall project scope of work was revised due to feedback from the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) indicating that surveys of the project area for the San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat (SBKR) were required. These surveys will be used in the preparation of the NESAP Environmental Impact Report. Page 1 of 3 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT PSA ADDENDUM WITH SARGENT TOWN PLANNING July 19, 2017 Page 2 ANALYSIS: The project team for preparation of the NESAP is led by STP as the prime consultant with Dudek, Michael Baker International, and Lisa Wise Consulting, et al, as sub -consultants. The sub - consultants provide supporting environmental, engineering, and market analysis documentation. The proposed Addendum No. 003 to the PSA and Scope of Work and Budget (Attachment 2) outlines all work completed to date and additional work to prepare the necessary components to complete the NESAP. Project components of the NESAP include a new Specific Plan, amendments to the General Plan and Etiwanda North Specific Plan, and an Environmental Impact Report. Proposed changes to the scope of work and budget include the following: Sargent Town Planning (STP) is the prime consultant responsible for project management, urban planning and design, and public outreach. Additional work by STP is related to the increased complexity of the environmental mitigations, and the coordination of the technical work related to the additional environmental, engineering, and market analysis components. Staff recommends providing STP $245,619.11 in additional funding to support completion of the NESAP. Dudek is responsible for environmental documentation, mapping and baseline studies, infrastructure analysis and planning, and annexation support. Additional work by Dudek will include biological resource assessment, hydrologic assessment, and additional California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review. Staff recommends providing STP $414,878.00 in additional funding to support Dudek's additional work in completion of the NESAP. Michael Baker International (MBI) provides support for land development and grading, mining assessment, hazards assessment, and mapping. Additional work by MBI will include developing a proper topographic and boundary survey in preparation of a Tentative Tract Map to subdivide the development priority area. Staff recommends providing STP $278,000.00 in additional funding to support MBI's work in completion of the NESAP. Lisa Wise Consulting (LWC) provides support for commercial and residential market analysis and the transfer of development rights. Additional work by'LWC will include a more detailed conservation and mitigation transfer/credit program in a higher level of detail than originally proposed. Staff recommends providing STP $13,000.00 in additional funding to support LWC's work in completion of the NESAP. The proposed addendum to the PSA and scope of work and budget will enable STP to fully complete the NESAP and all related components. Upon approval of this PSA Addendum, the consultant team is prepared to undertake the identified work to complete the NESAP. FISCAL IMPACT: The original PSA with STP provided a total NESAP funding of $1,566,249.00, including $1,361,956.00 for contract services and a 15% contingency of $204,293.00. In November 2015, a PSA addendum increased the funding for contract services to $1,495,926.00, and maintained a contingency of $70,323.00, without increasing the overall funding for the project. The proposed Page 2 of 3 P101 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT PSA ADDENDUM WITH SARGENT TOWN PLANNING July 19, 2017 Page 3 PSA addendum will increase funding for contract services by $951,497.11 up to $2,447,423.11, will maintain the $70,323.00 contingency, establishing a total project funding of $2,517,746.11. City funding for the NESAP is provided from the Sphere of Influences Issues Reserve fund. The San Bernardino County Flood Control District is the primary land owner within the NESAP development priority area and as such, the County of San Bernardino has agreed to reimburse the City $278,000.00 in engineering costs related to the preparation of the project Tentative Tract Map. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: MID AND LONG RANGE PLANNING Review and identify development, mitigation, preservation, and annexation potential in the Sphere area. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 —Vicinity Map Attachment 2 — PSA Addendum No. 003 with Scope of Work and Budget TG:Is Page 3 of 3 P102 Legend I Nv+,r ..astern Sphere Annexation .... Boundary Cucamonga Valley Water District & Inland Empire Utilities Agency Boundary City of Rancho Cucamonga Parcels San Bernardino National Forest P103 T a+� s�r�«�� r�`..�►� •ru.r�rw �'iYii5i }—XjEW F+ I aj I AWA 1101144 at' W Uj z� 1+ :o�tcre Eu�e:orrtQ Pi EQ uSG5 �terr .•CC NRCAN Exi 1 I apen� r+zTi E n CI -fie • 1�n¢,X4. E 6 ThsIa,a `omiom 2013 D t 2002 10' 4 600 7200 9.600 Feet Local Vicinity Map Attachment 1 P104 ADDENDUM NO. 003 to Professional Services Agreement Whereas; Sargent Town Planning (hereinafter "STP") and the City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter the "City") intend to enter into a Professional Services Agreement (hereinafter "Agreement"), and Whereas; STP has identified the following exceptions to the Agreement; Proposal to expand the scope of work for STP (including sub -consultant scope of work for Dudek, Michael Baker Incorporated, and Lisa Wise Consulting) associated with the development of the North Eastern Sphere Annexation Project for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County. Now therefore: STP and the City desire to incorporate the above exceptions to the attached Professional Services Agreement. Please indicate your agreement by way of signature to this Addendum No. 003 and the attached Professional Services Agreement. Please return two (2) original signed copies to the City no later than July 19, 2017 The City will process for signature and provide STP with one (1) fully executed copy of the Professional Services Agreement and Addendum No. 003. Sargent Town Planning By: Name Title By: Name Title Date Date (two signatures required if corporation) Last Revised: 11104113 City of Rancho Cucamonga By: Date Name Title By: Date Name Title Date Date Attachment 2 P105 MI SARGENT w■ TOWN PLANNING 8 May 2017 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attn: Tom Grahn, Associate Planner Re: North Eastern Sphere Annexation Specific Plan Scope, Schedule and Fee Update Dear Tom, As you are aware, the scope of work and schedule for this project has expanded substantially from that which our original proposal to the City anticipated. We very much appreciate the thoughtful and tenacious support that you and the rest of the City staff have provided to us to date in navigating a series of unanticipated challenges, and look forward to working with you all to successfully complete this important assignment. Per your request, we have prepared this memo and attachments to provide a relatively detailed accounting of the professional services and related fees to date for the project, and our projections of the services and fees required for the completion, approval and adoption of the specific plan, EIR and annexation. In preparing this information for your review we have endeavored to balance completeness with conciseness. The components of this report are: • This memo, providing a chronological overview of the work, identifying major tasks completed within the original scope, those completed outside the original scope, and those proposed outside the original scope to complete the project. • A spreadsheet summarizing the fees for each of the major task discussed in this memo, including those within the original scope, outside the original scope to date, and outside the original scope going forward. These are broken down by firm for Sargent Town Planning (STP), Dudek & Associates (Dudek), Michael Baker International (MBI), and Lisa Wise Consulting (LWC). We anticipate that the other team member firms can complete the project within their original scope so do not include discussions of their work. • A short memo describing Dudek's work to date within the original scope and outside the original scope, and the proposed future work outside the original scope, with the fee amounts and associated rationale and benefit. • Dudek's proposal for additional services going forward. • MBI's proposal for additional services going forward. The really short version of the reason for all these scope increases is that neither we nor our teammates nor City staff anticipated the level of concern and opposition with which the State and Federal environmental regulatory agencies have met this proposal for limited neighborhood development on 706 South Hill Street, 121h Floor I Los Angeles, CA 90014 1 213.599.7680 1 www.SargentTownPlanning.com 0j SARGENT - o■ TOWN PLANNING P106 terrain virtually identical to that on which all of the City's other foothill neighborhoods have been constructed over the course of several decades. And this opposition despite the fact that the City's central objective for this project has been and remains to provide a policy, design, and economic framework for systematically conserving the natural environment of most of the Plan Area, and for developing on less than 25% of the area sustainable neighborhoods, much more thoughtfully integrated with the natural terrain than in previous foothill development in Rancho Cucamonga, or in nearby communities with comparable foothill terrain. Proving once again that no good deed goes unpunished. Project Team and Roles Sargent Town Planning has been leading and directing the consultant side of the team, and Candyce Burnett and John Gillison have been directing City staff and providing the STP Team with direction. Karen Peterson was initial the City's project manager, and Tom Grahn has provided day to day management and coordination under Candyce's direction since Karen left the City. As a subconsultant to Sargent Town Planning, Dudek & Associates has been leading the environmental work for the project, including environmental existing conditions mapping, coordination with regulatory agencies, and will be preparing the EIR. They were selected for the team based on their wide experience and expertise in habitat conservation and endangered species issues in the Inland Empire, and because Stephanie Standerfer was to be Dudek's EIR project manager. When Stephanie moved to Webb Associates in June 2015, Ruta Thomas replaced her as Dudek's project manager. The City elected to retain Stephanie to assist City staff in managing and directing the project overall, and in particular advising the City/STP team on approach and strategy related to sharing information with and responding to the regulatory agencies questions and expressed concerns. The path to date and the recommendations herein for a path forward have been a team effort, led by organizations and individuals mentioned above. STP is takes primary responsibility for the team's approach and recommendations and is fully committed to moving this project forward in the best interests of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Chronology May to July 2015: Beginning with a late May kickoff meeting, the STP Team conducted a series of meetings and interviews with City staff and stakeholders, and prepared a series of background reports on the existing physical, environmental, regulatory and market economics conditions of the Plan Area and vicinity. The primary focus of this analysis was the lower 1,200 -acre area that the City has targeted for neighborhood development, including detailed biological/vegetation mapping. More generalized vegetation mapping was prepared for the upper sphere area ("conservation priority area"). All this work was per the onginol scope and fee. August to October 2015: Based on the information, base mapping and analysis, and in close consultation with City staff, we rapidly prepared an initial conceptual plan for neighborhood development within the 1,200 -acre area. This included a mixed-use town center in the former gravel mine area, neighborhoods surrounding it and along the eastern and western edges of the area, and a 2of12 MI SARG E NT ii TOWN PLANNING P107 natural open space corridor through the center. We presented this work in progress to the Planning Commission in a mid-August workshop and to the City Council in late October. The concepts were warmly received in both meetings, with good comments and suggestions. This work also included a preliminary assessment of the potential project impacts on biological resources and the potential for mitigating those impacts. The STP/City team met with regulatory agencies on October 15, including representatives of the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services (USFWS), Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE), and Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWCB). Their initial response to the conceptual design proposal was extremely negative, stating that the impacts that the development would have on the biological resources within the 1,200 acres could not possibly be mitigated. Key points included that this was the last, best remaining area of this type of vegetation in the region, and that it is critical habitat for two endangered species in particular — the San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat (SBKR) and the Coastal California Gnatcatcher. The agencies indicated that any impacts to the Riversidean Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub (RAFSS) vegetation within the 1,200 -acre area would need to be mitigated at high ratios (3:1 or 4:1 or 5:1), with higher ratios required if any of the area were found to be occupied by SBKR and lower if unoccupied. And while the "upper sphere" or "conservation priority area" to the north of the 1,200 -acre area does include some areas of RAFSS, most of it is characterized by other vegetation communities, including chaparral, oak woodland and other types that could not be used for RAFSS mitigation. Also, the initial vegetation mapping had shown vegetation community patterns consistent with "Waters of the U.S." in most of the 1,200 -acre area, notwithstanding the fact that virtually all natural stormwater flows to this area had been cut off by upstream flood control facilities decades earlier, and that the quality of the RAFSS environment had been systematically degrading since that time. All this work was per the original scope and fee. November 2015 to March 2016: In response to the feedback from regulatory agencies, the team determined that it was critically important that the general feasibly of mitigating the potential biological impacts be better understood before proceeding to prepare the specific plan and EIR for the project. A multi -pronged strategy was developed, requiring some professional services outside the scope and fee in the original contract. • Determine if the 1,200 -acre "development priority area" does or does not include any RAFSS currently occupied by SBKR. • Better understand the vegetation communities in the "conservation priority area" (a.k.a. upper sphere). • Increase the area and the environmental quality of the "creek corridor" proposed through the middle of the site, returning it to a more natural condition as a functional RAFSS environment with restored natural stormwater flows that improve the health of the RAFSS environment and potentially support the potential repopulation of that area with SBKR. On December 18, the STP/City team met with representatives of the San Bernardino County Flood Control District (SBCFCD) to discuss potential strategies for enhancing the quality of the RAFSS habitat 3of12 Sj SARGENT m® TOWN PLANNING P108 south of the big diversion levee that protects most of the development priority area from stormwater flows. Following a short presentation of the regulatory agency concerns by the STP/City team, SBCFDC staff suggested that it might be possible to remove the westerly portion of that levee to allow some natural flows back into that area, and the team recommended to City staff that a revised conceptual design be prepared to pursue that idea. In January, February and March, STP, Dudek and SBCFCD worked collaboratively to complete the work described above, and on April 5 the STP/City team has a second meeting with regulatory agency representatives. Services outside the original scope of services provided in this time period by STP and Dudek included: STP: Prepared initial diagrams of alternative "creek corridor" widths and alignments for City review and comment, and then refined the conceptual plan based on discussions with City staff and Dudek. The objective was to enlarge the "creek corridor" area, and align it to receive available natural stormwater flows. And to direct such flows to the south via a "creek" design that would a) protect neighborhood development from flows in major storm events, and b) allow sediment transport to the lower RAFSS area in small to moderate storm events, to help replenish the sandy substrate that makes the RAFSS area attractive habitat for SBKR. STP additional services for design, project management, coordination and meetings with Dudek and the City were approximately $41,200 Dudek: Dudek provided a proposal for additional services to conduct small mammal trapping within that area. The City allocated $133,970 to that effort from their project contingency, and from November 2015 to January 2017 Dudek conducted that program, starting with those areas felt to be most suitable for SBKR and most likely occupied. In June 2016, $16,440 of the total $133,970 SBKR trapping budget was reallocated for hydrology work related to stormwater flow analysis, thereby leaving $117,530 for SBKR trapping work. No SBKR were found during approximately 6,000 total trap nights, and the RAFSS areas were observed to be depleted of the sandy substrate that supports SBKR burrowing. The trapping work completed required approximately $92,254 of the $117,530 budgeted for this task (78.5%). Dudek provided a proposal for a small mammal trapping program and the City approved a contract amendment in the amount of $133,970 for that work. Dudek proposed to more thoroughly characterize the vegetation communities and habitat types within the "conservation priority area" to help clarify the potential for mitigation of potential development impacts within the "development priority area." Dudek completed a first pass at characterizing the vegetation communities of this area based primarily on interpretation of available satellite photography of the area. In that photography, many areas were in deep shade so yielded only approximate acreages of each community. This first round of mapping fell within Dudek's original scope and fee. Work with SBCFCD to identify the volumes and paths of stormwater coming off the hill directly north of the 1,200 -acre area, which could be directed into the lower portions of the site if the westerly tip of the levee is removed. Work with STP to prepare a conceptual design for the "creek" 4of12 MI SARGENT i■® TOWN PLANNING P109 element, including the points of upstream stormwater capture, and the general width, depth, slope and geometry of a naturalized channel that could safely conduct those flows through to the lower RAFSS area while keeping significant amounts of sediment in suspension. Dudek provided a proposal for conceptual hydrological design and coordination services and the City approved reallocating a portion of the approved SBKR trapping budget in the amount of $16,440 for that work. April to October 2016: At a meeting with the regulatory agencies on April 5, the STP/City/County team presented the results of the small mammal trapping program, maps summarizing vegetation types identified throughout the Specific Plan Area, and a diagrammatic version of a new design for the neighborhood areas and creek corridor/conservation area, along with an overview of the City's larger conservation strategy for the entire specific plan area. A short summary of the main points of regulatory agency response is: • They acknowledged that based on the trapping results it is likely that the area is no longer inhabited by SBKR. • They were complimentary and conditionally supportive of restoring natural stormwater flows into the lower RAFSS area. • They were concerned that the creek corridor was too narrow and recommended that it be widened. • They had a range of questions and concerns about how the creek corridor would be designed, focusing on the need for it to provide safe and attractive environments for small mammals. • They had a range of questions and concerns about how that conservation area would be managed, in term of access by humans and pets, and in terms of vegetation management to ensure the health of native species and protection from invasive species. Based on the input received from the regulatory agencies, the STP/City team determined that prior to moving forward with the specific plan and EIR for the project it would be appropriate to develop the conceptual design for the proposed partial levee removal and creek corridor construction to address the questions and concerns raised by the regulatory agencies. Additionally, it was determined that it would be important to gain a clearer understanding of the potential mitigation areas in the conservation priority area. STP and Dudek proposed, and City staff authorized, the following tasks, mostly outside the scope of the original contract. Essentially all of STP and Dudek time and fee in this time period was outside the original contract's scope, including internal meetings and coordination, meetings with the City and County, and meetings with regulatory agencies to refine the conservation and mitigation strategies through analysis and design. Primary tasks included: Dudek: Dudek identified the opportunity to obtain high resolution, rectified aerial drone photography of that entire area for a modest cost. Along with biological interpretation and limited field work Dudek proposed to produce significantly refined vegetation mapping for that area. Dudek 5of12 MMSARGENT no TOWN PLANNING Pilo proposed to provide additional conceptual hydrology design services in support of a more finite design for the creek corridor, to answer a range of questions asked by the regulatory agencies. Dudek proposed additional fees of $20,000 for these services, which were approved via a contract amendment in November 2016. STP: In collaboration with Dudek and in consultation with City staff, STP developed a revised conceptual neighborhood plan. This included the design in plan, section and profile of a new "creek corridor" element running from the levee removal area to the north, down through a "barranca" element into the northwest corner of the gravel mine area, and along the toe of the west bank of the gravel mine to discharge storm water flows into the enlarged RAFSS conservation area to the south. The plan remained conceptual in nature, but considerable attention was paid to the conceptual design of the neighborhood/creek corridor interface, in response to concerns expressed by the regulatory agencies that urban runoff, pets and humans not encroach inappropriately into the conservation area. STP additional services for design, project management, coordination and meetings with Dudek and the City were $54,500. 27 October 2016 to Present: On October 27 another meeting was held at CDFW's offices in Ontario. In attendance were representatives of CDFW, USFWS, ACOE, RWQCB, County Flood Control, City of Rancho Cucamonga, STP, Dudek, and Stephanie Standerfer from Webb. The STP/City team and representatives of SBCFCD presented the refined conceptual designs for partial levee removal and restoration of natural stormwater flows to into the lower RAFSS areas. The response from the regulatory agencies was more harshly critical than expected, including the following specific points: • Because we had recently presented the big picture conservation strategy for the upper sphere "conservation priority area" to this same group of regulators, our presentation focused on the habitat restoration strategy for the lower 1,200 -acre "development priority area", answering many of the technical and implementation -related questions they had asked about that system in our previous meeting with them. It was clear in the meeting that they had largely forgotten about that larger objective, despite our references to it in the meeting. • The agencies expressed their concern that the creek corridor/conservation area (which had been significantly enlarged relative to the earlier conceptual plan) was still "too small" and "too narrow." • The reiterated their concern from the first meeting that the impacts on the RAFSS could not be mitigated. • They reiterated a range of concerns about whether and how the restoration and permanent conservation of the lower RAFSS restoration/conservation area would actually be protected from on-going human and pet -related impacts. We indicated that this would be spelled out in detail in the specific plan's implementation chapter. • We made the point that just leaving the site as it is will result in the continuing degradation of the quality of the RAFSS and other habitats, due to the absence of rejuvenating natural 6of12 MM SARGENT M® TOWN PLANNING P111 stormwater flows and lack of conservation management, and that limited development of the area could fund those environmental improvements. • The agencies countered that perhaps there was some other option, in which someone with financial resources might propose a "conservation only" option that did not require any development within the property. In mid-February, Stephanie Standerfer had a phone conversation with Karin Cleary -Rose in which Ms. Cleary -Rose let her know that USFWS had been in discussions for a year or so with the San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District (SBVMWD) about the District's interest in acquiring the County's property within the 1,200 -acre Development Priority Area for conservation purposes. On 14 March 2017, STP, Ms. Standerfer and City staff met with Heather Dyer of SBVMWD to discuss the potential for the District and the City and the County to work collaboratively to share the costs and benefits of a joint environmental conservation/mitigation program that might potentially encompass all or most of the Specific Plan Area. Such a program would likely also include the Inland Empire Resource Conservation District (IERCD) to assist with the technical work of restoration and on-going operational support for conservation. Potential strengths of such a joint program include: • SBVMWD brings to the table significant financial resources for environmental restoration, conservation and on-going maintenance. • SBVMWD is willing to acquire conservation land, whereas the City and IERCD are generally not. • SBVMWD has a good working relationship with the regulatory agencies. • The City is willing to take responsibility for land use jurisdiction and provision of municipal services to existing and future development within the North Eastern Sphere Area through adoption of a Specific Plan an annexation of the area to the City. This would remove and replace the existing County zoning that is threatening the upper sphere Conservation Priority Area with haphazard urban development. But the City will do this only if Wilson Avenue is connected through the site and if there is enough development of the envisioned types to make the deal a fiscal positive for the City. • The County's interests include receiving good value for their land holdings, and fulfilling their commitment to work collaboratively with the City to that end. • This is the foundation for a successful multi -agency collaboration that can advance the agenda of each agency while also advancing the regulatory agency's objectives for environmental conservation and improvement. At that meeting the City requested that STP and Ms. Standerfer and Dudek work together to define a revised conceptual neighborhood development plan for the Development Priority Area that provided substantially more conservation acreage, and that concentrated development in those portions of the site where impacts on RAFSS would be lowest. Mr. Gillison suggested that more than half the area should be devoted to neighborhood development, perhaps up to around two thirds of the area. The following week, STP developed alternative diagrams for such a revised plan, and in a conference call with Brock Ortega of Dudek and Ms. Standerfer, a preferred alternative was identified. STP developed that alternative at a conceptual level of street and block configurations within each proposed neighborhood development area and shared those drawings with City staff. City staff requested that an 7of12 Mj SARGENT mm TOWN PLANNING P112 additional development area be shown, and STP added it, resulting in the current draft conceptual plan shown on below. STP fees for additional services related to conceptual design alternatives, project management, coordination and meetings with Dudek and the City from 1 January 1 through 30 April 2017 were $38,000. Other time spent during this time period - updating the project schedule, reporting on project status, and coordinating the initiation of the EIR work are included in the original scope. Going Forward: The areas of the scope that have expanded and require additional fee beyond that already authorized are summarize below, and: Sargent Town Planning: As the rest of this scope has expanded, more time is required of us in structuring and managing the work. We very much appreciate your understanding of this and the additional compensation you have been providing to us for the on-going work. Our goal at this point is to get back into the original scope and fee as much as possible. We have incurred about $38,000 in fees since our last invoice and would suggest budgeting and additional $148,000 in addition to the remaining fee in our contract. Most of this is related to the increase complexity of the environmental mitigation, and the coordination of the technical work related to environmental and engineering services from Dudek and MBI and LWC. Most of this additional time will be David Sargent and John Baucke coordinating the technical studies, EIR and financial framework. STP projects additional services to complete the project will require up to $148,000 from this point forward. Dudek: The on-going expansion of the scope of the habitat mapping and assessment, in support of conservation and mitigation strategies for the specific plan and EIR that are likely to satisfy the regulatory agencies, to the extent that is possible. Not to resolve these matters at a project -level, but to generate and support a solid physical design, regulatory, and financial framework and system whereby project -level entitlements, impacts and mitigations will be evaluated when development occurs. See attached memo from Dudek for a more complete description of these services and the value they are anticipated to add to the project and the real property. uuaeKleesror auuitionol - -es to complete the project are $396,878. These are presented in more detail in the attached spreadsheet, Dudek's attached memo, and Dudek's proposal dated April 20, 2017 Michael Baker International: MBI's scope is expanding to include a proper topographic and boundary survey of the 1,200 acres in support of a tentative parcel map (TPM) to subdivide the property into a number of "development parcels" and "conservation parcels", and a Wilson Avenue right of way for greater clarity in dealing with regulatory agencies and for conveyance purposes, Along with a somewhat higher level of detail than previously envisioned for the conceptual grading, street and utility systems within the development parcels. 8of12 ON SARGENT 1111111111■ TOWN PLANNING P113 It is anticipated that the adoption of a TPM along with the adoption of the Specific Plan and the annexation of the area to the City will add significant value to the real property that would accrue to the County upon sale, and to the City in terms of a simpler and quicker entitlement process for that development. M8/ fees for additional services to complete the project are $308,000. These are presented in more detail in the attached spreadsheet, and M81's proposal dated 18 April 2017, attached Lisa Wise Consulting: The transfer of development rights (TDR) work included in our proposal and current scope has morphed into more of an "acquisition of conservation rights" program. And the complexity of that has increased as we have learned more about the challenges the project faces. Their original scope included more assistance with the new zoning and integration with your existing zoning than we anticipate needing, so more of their existing fee is being focused on the conservation rights piece, completing the conceptual pro forma for the neighborhood development, and working with you folks, IERCD, SBVMWD to structure a practical system that will be credible to the regulatory agencies. They have about $66,000 of their original budget remaining, and anticipate requiring an additional $13,000 to complete the project based on what we now know. The additional value such a mitigation program is anticipated to add significant value to the property and to streamline subsequent permit processing. LWCs fees for additional services to complete the project are $13,000. These are related to the increased scope and complexity of preparing a conservation credit program (in replacement of the Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) program originally anticipated for the implementation chapter of the Specific Plan. Other Team Members: At this time we do not expect any increases in scope of fee for other team members. As you know, Calthorpe Associates is effectively no longer part of the team as we don't believe we need further services from them. Fehr & Peers are in scope, as is Raimi + Associates. We have a bit of scope left for Zimmerman Volk and expect to consult them as we finalize the plan. I attach our latest schedule for your information, along with the Dudek and MBI proposals, which I also sent previously. Please call any time with any questions or to discuss. Best Regards, U, — David Sargent, Principal Stephanie Standerfer, Albert A. Webb Associates 9of12 MOSARGENT m■ TOWN PLANNING I NO1 IN02 CONSOI CH01 E02 NE03 �� CN `— CN03 CNQ4 CNOS l NEOS LCNO6 NE04 NE06 NO r CN09 CN10 NE07 CONS02 CnN1I CN08 TCO2 TC03 NE08 TCO TC04 N 7C06. E TC07 E1 t " COS E10 EN02 ENO1 ENOS EN12 r wt:o+,Ave j N1 NO EN04 JJ CONS03 N1 '4N1 EN06 FEN09 EN10 , 3 a Legend I lrrr CO1 ENI 1 Revised Conceptual Neighborhood Plan Deve opment Priority Area ho th 6ntem Spee Annexation Speofit Plan + i. 10 of 12 I� !N20 EN21 04 I }--------- -.-y f+ �jSARGENT tri■ 0,WIl LAN%INS, P114 S j SARG E NT m■ TOWN PLANNING Revised Neighborhood Footprints + Vegetation Types Development Priority Area NorthrastemSohereAnnexation SpeofitPlan ai*un. 11 of 12 SA RG EN T OWN PLAN` rC, P115 � bOb �Obp O r°r N N N S V a 0 gA 9.S ¢m.� m m m .moi vi a � 8 p � H � O M eytrry y �mmmp. h N yO $ F h Q 8 �p N O 8 T O pPp � fmV N N N N N N O q N m Q N 2S 2i o x 25 rvpl�h y0 � Vf v�j N h N N C r N N N Ul f C N gnem1 {oo} 8 3 m y N N N E O Y` a Z � S �Z �s ZZ v u= u k u� E E Q uai a an d u u S u o E i u v ,E d o a ♦ a M C n g c 3 Y E o Q c off° Z a Z y a Z Z 5 / Z a ELL => o `d' F o a o �' E 4, 4. r m E '4^ a yl E 4 :6 h nn rt, — c F i t E o M ° o, i E y Z, E �Q/��Yu'Q n�u.psv oEvo na �ui 3�pau o�a��uu Z, V/ O L Y E y -t3 ` eN oO O �0'S w��p yaGg Eo o`E��ev4 i�l ozi-; �a maa`gu 7■. z N 6 ry m 6 N 6 N W ° E e a m m t E ' c c E i 2 oe h m f G f ;A1[:1 0 Z f— Z z Z Q W Oz- �O � Z Q c V) mm 9 0 s Eu I © a P117 �oeeo i en MINOR IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIO i 00�I19lE n. ve �alN�l�p ilii '11�6�1i001§0I ��I�� i vane �i'° 0�il�oll mi ,000�0000�, 00�0�0000�0 9 0 s Eu I © a P117 P118 38 NORTH MARENGO PASADENA. CALIFORNIA 91101 T 626 204 9800 MEMORANDUM To: David Sargent, Principal, Sargent Town Planning (STP) From: Ruta K. Thomas, REPA, Principal. Dudek C�r Subject: NESAP Project Summary & Future Tasks (Dudek Project #9020) Date: May 8, 2017 Project Summary To date, Dudek has worked with the STP team to help identify and investigate the various environmental/infrastructure challenges of the project site, especially as they relate to biological resources and hydrologic issues. In doing so, Dudek has coordinated with multiple resource agencies to confirm the work required to determine the key potential impacts of the proposed project on the overall project site. To date, Dudek has completed Tasks 1 and 2 of the contracted budget, which included kicking off the project with the City and STP team, refining the overall work program multiple times, and determining the potential environmental and infrastructure (engineering) constraints related to the project area and how the proposed annexation could be affected by those conditions. The largest part of investigating the biological resources challenges of the overall project site involved conducting extensive vegetative mapping of the upper sphere and conducting on -the -ground surveys for San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat (SBKR) in the development area. Initially, Dudek prepared vegetation mapping based on Google Earth photography. However, to respond to a request for more detailed mapping, Dudek commissioned a drone to fly the entire upper sphere to get a more accurate picture of the vegetation in this area. Additionally, Dudek conducted a SBKR trapping program over approximately 6,000 trap nights in the 1,200 -acre development area over the course of almost one year. These two tasks provided a much clearer understanding of the project site's overall habitat as it relates to both sensitive plant and animal species, and therefore, allowed for a more informed discussion with the applicable resource agencies. Over the course of conducting this work, Dudek also participated in several in-person meetings with various resource agencies, and also strategy conference calls with the STP team. Dudek's work in this area helped the team gain a better overall understanding of the project site's opportunities and constraints, as well as the expectations of the various resource agencies. Dudek also assisted the STP team with starting to determine where and how much stormwater can flow through the potential development area, which has included coordination with City staff, as well as the San Bernardino Flood Control District staff. As part of this work effort, Dudek conducted multiple iterations and hydraulic compliance checks for Michael Baker's (MB) grading plans. Dudek also provided draft WWW DUDEK.COM 101x'. Mr. David Sargent Subject: NESAP Project Summary & Future Tasks grading concepts to MB as part of this iterative process. Dudek set up and ran a full HECRAS 1 D model for the entire proposed reach, which included preparing associated exhibits. Dudek has reviewed the current project goals, MB's grading plan, and alternatives with STP. Dudek participated in several in- person meetings with the San Bernardino Flood Control District and other resource agencies. As part of conducting the work summarized above, Dudek managed the overall work effort, as well as the overall internal team. This involved participating in several in-person and telecon meetings with the STP team and/or City staff. Concurrently, Dudek is continually ensuring that the technical work being conducted is consistent with CEQA and will align with implementation of the Specific Plan. Future Work As per recent discussions with the City, the proposed NESAP Project will now consider an updated plan showing the potential development area just east of the high school and along the power line easement on the eastern edge of the property, with the gross site utilization as follows: • Development footprint: 568.3 acres (49% of total) • Conservation footprint: 491.5 acres (42% of total) • Utility Easement: 100.0 acres (9% of total) • Total: approximately 1,198 acres This equates to a total program of approximately 3,000 dwelling units, broken down as follows: • 1,710 single-family detached units (57% of units) • 570 single-family attached units (19% of units) • 720 multi-family/condo units (24% of units) Additionally, there would be up to 300,000 square feet of non-residential uses, including retail, office, and flex space. Given the project as it is proposed now, Dudek's currently contracted scope of work will need to be expanded to include. the following tasks for completion of environmental review; 1) Biological Resources Assessment; 2) Hydrologic Assessment; and 3) expanded CEQA review. 1) Biological Resources Assessment This scope is intended to provide data to support agency discussions and the eventual CEQA analysis related to the programmatic NESAP project. Minimally, the regulatory agencies and CEQA document will need to address impacts and preservation within the Development Priority Area (DPA). It is anticipated that additional information will be needed to address likely mitigation that is available within the Conservation Priority Area (CPA). It is assumed that the vegetation mapping (DPA and CPA) and jurisdictional delineation (DPA) performed to date are still accurate and suitable for the purposes of the analysis. We assume that the San Bernardino kangaroo rat trapping conducted to date is sufficient from the wildlife agencies perspective. We further assume that burrowing owl surveys are not necessary and can be addressed through pre -construction surveys, where applicable. Finally, we assume that surveys D U D E K 2 May 2020 7 P120 Mr. David Sargent Subject: NESAP Project Summary & Future Tasks for other species not identified within the agreed-upon scope are not needed. Dudek will be involved in advancing discussions with the wildlife agencies to meet CEQA goals. The specific tasks include the following, as deemed necessary by the City: • Special Status Plant Surveys • Coastal California Gnatcatcher Surveys • Optional Small Mammal Trappings in the CPA • Reconnaissance Survey of the CPA • Contingency Fee • Meetings • Biological Resources Existing Conditions Report 2) Hydrologic Assessment This scope is intended to help determine where and how much stormwater can flow through the potential development area. It will be important to work with the San Bernardino County Flood Control District to model where the Waters of the U.S. can actually flow now. This is critical to: a) getting credit for reintroducing waters by removing part of the levee; and b) developing appropriate and reasonable mitigation. Dudek will coordinate with the San Bernardino County Flood Control District, the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the STP team to determine the required stormwater flow information for the proposed project. Dudek will support the preparation of creek corridor/stormwater system diagrams, as needed, as well as the discussion of the creek corridor and stormwater systems for the infrastructure section of the Specific Plan. This task assumes the provision of on-site utility coordination and planning/design as per our originally contracted scope of work. Dudek will perform a review of on-site drainage and water quality work to be performed by Michael Baker International to ensure it conforms with the standards set forth by the San Bernardino County Flood Control District. Dudek will also attend a total of two (2) meetings with agencies and/or the project team. 3) Expanded CEQA Review This scope is intended to ensure timely and efficient completion of CEQA review of the proposed project. Dudek will continue to provide the overall services associated with preparation of an EIR as per our originally contracted scope of work. The CEQA review task is expanded to consider an increase in agency involvement in the project, additional public outreach, and additional work associated with preparation of an environmental document that will undergo additional rounds of internal legal review. Two (2) rounds of internal legal review have been assumed. Finally, successful completion of the CEQA document will also require participation in additional (up to five [5]) agency meetings than originally contracted, as well as heavier involvement in the implementation planning portion of preparing the Specific Plan. ❑U❑EK 3 May 201270 DUDEK ---P121 38 NORTH MAPENGO PASADENA CALIFORNIA. 91101 T 626 204 9800 MEMORANDUM To: David Sargent, Principal, Sargent Town Planning From: Ruta K. Thomas, REPA, Principal, Dudekn Subject: Request for Contract Amendment - NESAP Project (Dudek Project #9020) Date: April 20, 2017 As per recent discussions with the City, the proposed NESAP Project will now consider an updated plan showing the potential development area just east of the high school and along the power line easement on the eastern edge of the property, with the gross site utilization as follows: • Development footprint: 568.3 acres (49% of total) • Conservation footprint: 491.5 acres (42% of total) • Utility Easement: 100.0 acres (9% of total) • Total: approximately 1,198 acres This equates to a total program of approximately 3,000 dwelling units, broken down as follows: • 1,710 single-family detached units (57% of units) • 570 single-family attached units (19% of units) • 720 multi-family/condo units (24% of units) Additionally, there would be up to 300,000 square feet of non-residential uses, including retail, office, and flex space. Given the project as it is proposed now, we have included the following tasks for completion of environmental review: 1) Biological Resources Assessment; 2) Hydrologic Assessment; and 3) CEQA review. CONTRACT & INVOICING PHASE 5 1) Biological Resources Assessment This scope is intended to provide data to support agency discussions and the eventual CEQA analysis related to the programmatic NESAP project. Minimally, the regulatory agencies and CEQA document will need to address impacts and preservation within the Development Priority Area (DPA). It is anticipated that additional information will be needed to address likely mitigation that is available within the Conservation Priority Area (CPA). For the purposes of this scope and cost estimate, Dudek assumes that the vegetation mapping (DPA and CPA) and jurisdictional delineation (DPA) performed to date are still accurate and suitable for the purposes of this analysis. We assume WWW DUDEK COM P122 Mr. David Sargent Subject: Request for Contract Amendment - NESAP Project that the San Bernardino kangaroo rat trapping to date is sufficient from the wildlife agencies perspective. We further assume that burrowing owl surveys are not necessary and can be addressed through pre -construction surveys, where applicable. Finally, we assume that surveys for other species not identified within this scope are not needed. This scope includes tasks to advance discussions with the wildlife agencies and meet CEQA goals, and also includes optional tasks that may be requested at any time to further meet agency requests. The tasks include: • Special Status Plant Surveys • Coastal California Gnatcatcher Surveys • Optional Small Mammal Trappings in the CPA • Reconnaissance Survey of the CPA • Contingency Fee • Meetings • Biological Resources Existing Conditions Report Task 1: Special Status Plant Surveys Dudek will conduct rare plant surveys to identify and quantify all sensitive plant species found within the DPA project area (1,215 -acre area). Special -status plant surveys require 100% visual coverage of suitable habitat. Dudek will conduct focused special -status plant surveys within suitable habitat on-site. Prior to the field visit, the California Native Plant Society (CNPS) online inventory, the California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB), and the list of endangered, threatened, or candidate species in the jurisdiction of the Carlsbad Field Office of the USFWS will be reviewed for past and/or potential occurrences of sensitive plants in the vicinity. Depending on quality of habitat and timing of rainfall, it is anticipated that approximately two (2) survey visits—one each in spring and early summer --will be required for maximum detectability of rare plants. Exact timing of rare plant surveys will be determined through observation of conditions of plant phenology at unrelated project sites throughout the region, with additional weight being given to sites in the vicinity of the project site. Focused plant surveys will conform to CNPS Botanical Survey Guidelines (CNPS 2001); Protocols for Surveying and Evaluating Impacts to Special Status Native Populations and Natural Communities (CDFG 2009); and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services General Rare Plant Survey Guidelines (Cypher 2002). The plant species encountered during the field surveys will be identified to subspecies or variety, if applicable, to determine sensitivity status. Latin and common names for plant species with a California Rare Plant Rank (formerly CNPS List) will follow the California Native Plant Society On - Line Inventory of Rare, Threatened, and Endangered Plants of California (CNPS 2013). For plant species without a California Rare Plant Rank, Latin names will follow the Jepson Interchange List of Currently Accepted Names of Native and Naturalized Plants of California (Jepson Flora Project 9020 D U D E K 2 April 2017 P123 Mr. David Sargent Subject: Request for Contract Amendment - NESAP Project 2013), and common names will follow the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service Plants Database (USDA 2013). If target species are encountered, field personnel will demarcate the outer boundary of the occurrence or the point location. The data collected will include, at a minimum, species name, number or range of individuals for each occurrence, and the botanist collecting the data. Assumptions: • Coverage is approximately 40 acres per day per biologist • Survey effort will require approximately 61 person days to complete Estimated Cost for Task 1 = $107,000.00 Task 2: Coastal California Gnatcatcher Surveys In order to address CEQA needs and to negotiate with the wildlife agencies, a good understanding of the California gnatcatcher (CAGN) populations within the DPA will be required. It is assumed that there are approximately 803 acres of suitable gnatcatcher habitat within the DPA. The project area is located outside of a Natural Communities Conservation Plan (NCCP) enrollment area. Surveys will be conducted according to the guidelines adopted by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) on February 28, 1997. For areas with suitable habitat (e.g., coastal sage scrub sub -associations) outside of enrolled NCCP areas, six visits per 100 acres of suitable habitat are required during the breeding season (March 15 through June 30). There is a minimum interval of seven (7) days between visits. As specified in the USFWS guidelines, surveys will be conducted only during clement weather conditions to avoid excessive or abnormal heat, wind, rain, or fog. In accordance with permit requirements, a 10 -day pre -survey notification letter and a 45 -day post -survey report is required to be submitted to USFWS. This task includes a letter report disclosing the results of the survey. For the purposes of this cost estimate, it is assumed that six person days would be required to adequately survey the site for each pass. We are able to mobilize, notify the USFWS, and conduct the survey within 15 -days of authorization. Assumptions: • Survey approval and timing sufficient to be performed within the breeding season window, otherwise, survey requirements increase to nine (9) visits with 2 -week intervals • Biologists are only allowed to survey 80 acres per day per biologist • Survey effort will require 60 person days to complete. 9020 D U D E K 3 April 2017 P124 Mr. David Sargent Subject: Request for Contract Amendment - NESAP Project Estimated Cost for Task 2: $122,000.00 • Optional Task 2a: California Gnatcatcher Surveys of Mitigation Lands While this is a programmatic effort, it is possible that the wildlife agencies will need to understand the CAGN populations within the projected CPA mitigation area in order to fully analyze the effects of the proposed project. If this is required, then Dudek will conduct focused surveys in those areas too, using the same methods as described above. For purposes of this estimate, costs are provided for San Bernardino Flood and County of San Bernardino lands (approximately 227 acres) and North Etiwanda Preserve lands (approximately 384 acres). Estimated Optional Cost for County Lands = $34,600.00 Estimated Optional Cost for North Etiwanda Preserve Lands = $57,000.00 Task 3: Optional Small Mammal Trappings in the CPA During past meetings with the wildlife agencies, we received feedback that they were interested in understanding how the small mammal diversity within the CPA compared to the diversity that was found during our past San Bernardino kangaroo rat trapping studies in the DPA. This task provides budget to trap various locations within the CPA to determine species diversity and relative distribution. During the effort, trapping would occur at various locations distributed across the CPA which are similar to the DPA area. If unique areas are found, then they will be trapped as well to bolster the knowledge of diversity in the CPA area. Standard small mammal live -trapping methods will be used for this effort. Estimated Cost for Optional Task 3 = $20,000.00 Task 4: Reconnaissance Survey of the CPA Much time and effort has been allocated to the DPA portion of the project. This task would allow biologists to conduct a brief biological survey of accessible portions of the CPA to gain a better biological understanding of the habitat available for species. This will be an important task in building the rationale for the programmatic effort and to gain a better understanding of provisional mitigation opportunities. It is anticipated that six (6) person days will be spent reviewing the CPA for biological resources and developing more detailed habitat assessments for species. Special -status species will be mapped and their relative distribution will be included within the biological resources report. Estimated Cost for Task 4 = $11,400.00 D U D E K 4 April 2017 P125 Mr. David Sargent Subject: Request for Contract Amendment - NESAP Project Task 5: Contingency Fee It is anticipated that during the site design process, various minor tasks will be requested of the biological team. These may include site design review, strategy evaluations, expert opinion, agency strategy discussions, and other requests. Dudek will provide these items as requested by the project team. For purposes of this task item, a small contingency has been included. Estimated Cost for Task 5 = $10, 000.00 Task 6: Meetings It is anticipated that a number of meetings will be required. These may include team, agency, or other meetings. Dudek will attend meetings as necessary and as directed by Sargent Town Planning. For purposes of this estimate, it is initially assumed that three (3) meetings may be required, but this can be augmented as required. Estimated Cost for Task 6 = $5,000.00 Task 7: Biological Resources Existing Conditions Report For this initial effort, Dudek has been requested to provide a basic Biological Resources Existing Conditions Report. Typically, for a project of this type and importance, the Biological Resources Existing Conditions Report would be a robust document that receives a number of rounds of review and revision to meet the needs of the jurisdiction and their legal representation. Typically, in order to support CEQA, the report would include an impact analysis and mitigation strategy and also address cumulative effects to resources. This report will only include data regarding the methods and results of the contracted studies to date. It will only include a brief synopsis of the impacts from the proposed project and brief mitigation strategies that might be employed to fully mitigate impacts to biological resources. It will not include a detailed impacts analysis or detailed mitigation measures. Additionally, this report will include one submittal to Sargent Town Planning for input. It is anticipated that once the project design and agency meetings have matured, this document will form the basis of the more standard and detailed Biological Resources Report that would support the ultimate CEQA document. The report will include a discussion of the survey methodology according to the appropriate protocol and adequacy of the surveys. Vegetation communities and special -status botanical and wildlife resources will be described in terms of their regional significance and presence on-site, including an estimate of observed special -status species' population size and condition. A description of each vegetation community mapped within the project area will include information found in a literature 20 D U D E K 5 April 2017 s `z:1 Mr. David Sargent Subject: Request for Contract Amendment - NESAP Project review, as well as project -specific data recorded in the field, such as general species composition, a brief description of location, and any notes pertaining to habitat quality or level of disturbance. All botanical and wildlife resources observed, or having a reasonable potential to occur on-site to constrain the project, will be addressed in the report. A table summarizing the special -status plant and wildlife species that occur in the project vicinity, but which have no reasonable potential to occur or otherwise constrain the project, will be included but not discussed further. Graphics will be included that show the extent of each vegetation community mapped within the project area, as well as any special -status plant or wildlife species observed. All plant and wildlife species encountered and identified will be recorded to include as an appendix to the Biological Resources Existing Conditions Report. Estimated Cost for Task 7= $10,000.00 Biological Resources Assessment Subtotal (without optional task) _ $285,400 CONTRACT & INVOICING PHASE 5A 2) Hydrologic Assessment This scope is intended to help determine where and how much stormwater can flow through the potential development area. It will be important to work with the San Bernardino County Flood Control District to model where the Waters of the U.S. can actually flow now. This is critical to: a) getting credit for reintroducing waters by removing part of the levee; and b) developing appropriate and reasonable mitigation. Dudek will coordinate with the San Bernardino County Flood Control District, the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the Sargent Town Planning team to determine the required stormwater flow information for the proposed project. Dudek will support the preparation of creek corridor/stormwater system diagrams, as needed, as well as the discussion of the creek corridor and stormwater systems for the infrastructure section of the Specific Plan. This task assumes the provision of on-site utility coordination and planning/design as per our originally contracted scope of work. Dudek will perform a review of on-site drainage and water quality work to be performed by Michael Baker International to ensure it conforms with the standards set forth by the San Bernardino County Flood Control District. Dudek will also attend a total of two (2) meetings with agencies and/or the project team. San Bernardino County Flood Control District Coordination = $8,000.00 Creek Corridor/Stormwater System Diagrams = $15,000.00 On-site Drainage and Water Quality Review = $4,680 Two (2) Agency Meetings = $1,700.00 9020 D U D E K 6 April 2017 Mr. David Sargent Subject: Request for Contract Amendment - NESAP Project Hydrologic Assessment Subtotal = $29,380 CONTRACT & INVOICING PHASE 5 3) CEQA Review This scope is intended to ensure timely and efficient completion of CEQA review of the proposed project. To date, a portion of the budget for preparation of the Draft EIR was reallocated to complete work related to the hydrologic assessment. As such, this amendment includes reimbursement of this reallocation as part of the overall request. Dudek will continue to provide the overall services associated with preparation of an EIR as per our originally contracted scope of work. This amendment covers additional out -of -scope work associated with an increase in agency involvement in the project, additional public outreach, and additional work associated with preparation of an environmental document that will undergo additional rounds of internal legal review. Two (2) rounds of internal legal review have been assumed. Finally, successful completion of the CEQA document will also require participation in additional (up to five [5]) agency meetings than originally contracted, as well as heavier involvement in the implementation planning portion of preparing the Specific Plan. Reallocated Hydrologic Assessment Work = $8,708.00 Phase 3: Public Outreach & Vision Plan = $1,240.00 Phase 5: Administrative Draft EIR Documents = $64,200.00 Phase 7: Public Workshops & Public Hearings = $2,400.00 Five (5) Agency Meetings = $4,800.00 Other Direct Costs = $750 CEQA Review Subtotal = $82,098 Total Cost Estimate = $396,878 We look forward to working with you and the team to achieve successful completion of this project. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you for considering this request. Authorization to Proceed: David Sargent, Principal DUDEK Date 9020 April 2017 P127 P128 I N T E R N AT 1 0 N A L April 18, 2017 Mr. David Sargent SARGENT TOWN PLANNING 706 S. Hill Street, 12t' Floor Los Angeles, CA 90014 We Make o Difference PN 147257 Addendum 2 Subject: Professional Services Proposal — North Eastern Sphere Annexation — Rancho Cucamonga, CA — Specific Plan Civil Engineering and Tentative Tract Map Dear David: Michael Baker International, Inc. is pleased to provide you with this proposal for additional professional consulting services for the subject project. The attached Exhibit "A" details the specific scope items that are associated with this proposal. Also attached are Exhibit "B," Compensation and Exhibit "C,A Site Limits. Thank you for the opportunity to be a part of your team. If you have any questions, you may reach me at (909) 974-4937. Sincerely, J -amen A,)Sinnema. P.E- Land Development JAS-tm H %PDATA1147257Wdnun1ProposaNAWR 2`.SP Eng n PC: Angel Cesar. Michael Baker Darin Johnson, Michael Baker 3536 Concours Street, Suite 1001 Ontario, CA 91764 MBAKERINTL.COM Office, 909-974-49001 Fax 909-974-4004 s P4:'. We Make o Difference Michael Baker International April 18, 2017 Sargent Town Planning — 147257 AWR 2 Page 2 EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF SERVICES SPECIFIC PLAN CIVIL ENGINEERING AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP Under our current consultant services agreement, Michael Baker International ("Consultant" or "Michael Baker") shall perform the following Scope of Services in support of the Specific Plan for the North Eastern Sphere Annexation in Rancho Cucamonga, California. This addendum is for work that has been requested as follows: • Specific Plan Civil Engineering • Tentative Tract Map During the previous authorizations, Michael Baker has provided grading support, SMARA assistance, hazards support and constraints mapping. The majority of the support has been for high-level preliminary grading design for the 1,200 -acre development area, including the open space drainage area that bisects the site. Tasks yet to be completed under the initial authorization include the LAFCO Legal Exhibit task and the SMARA and Hazards support tasks. The goal of the next phase(s) of work will be to complete the LAFCO process by March 2018. This is due to anticipated staff changes at the County of San Bernardino and LAFCO as well as possible changes in City Council members during elections later in 2018. Other goals include completing a Specific Plan for the 1,200 -acre development along with a conveyance tentative map for the City to be able to sell off portions of the development site to residential or commercial builders. The current development plan, dated April 17, 2017, includes approximately 3,000 dwelling units and 406k square feet of non-residential/commercial development. Sargent Town Planning will prepare the preliminary lot layout and grading plan for the development area. Michael Baker will then prepare the final lot layout and grading plan after the City's review. A preliminary drainage master plan is required. Another team member (presumably Dudek) will be completing hydrology drainage design for the conservation areas and Michael Baker will complete the drainage master plan for the neighborhood areas. TASK 1.0 - COMPILE RECORD BOUNDARY Michael Baker will compile the record boundary for the proposed development area. Existing record mapping will be obtained and calculated to compile the record boundary in CAD. This task does P130 We Make o Difference Michael Baker International April 18, 2017 Sargent Town Planning — 147257 AWR 2 Page 3 not include boundary surveys or Record of Survey to confirm/establish the boundary in the field. However these services can be provided under a future authorization if requested. TASK 2.0 - AERIAL TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING Michael Baker shall prepare an aerial topographic map of the project site, at a scale of V=40% with one foot contour intervals in CAD. The area mapped will include the property and approximately 100 feet outside of the property boundary. The work shall include: • Color ortho-rectified photo of the site. • Aerial targets set and controlled with horizontal coordinates based on California State Plane Coordinate System and converted to a local ground system. The vertical control will be based on NAVD88. • Completion of field survey check profile observations and office analysis of said observations to check ground truth of the compiled map. TASK 3.0 - REFINED PRELIMINARY LOT LAYOUT AND GRADING PLAN Michael Baker will collaborate with the Client, and the Client's land plan designer on the preparation of preliminary lot layout plan. Michael Baker will prepare a refined preliminary residential lot layout and preliminary site grading plans for the project area. The refined preliminary lot lay out will be based on proposed land use, residential development type, and minimum lot size information as supplied by the Client. This scope allows up to two (2) iterations of preliminary plans. The preliminary site/lot layout and grading plans shall include input from other project team members, including hydrology/drainage, geotechnical, and circulation/traffic (i.e. access points, internal circulation) as necessary. The preliminary plan shall respect and match existing grades at the periphery of the site. Initial assumptions will be made to accommodate anticipated drainage and flood control requirements. Once preliminary hydrology, drainage and water quality management studies have been completed pursuant to those tasks included herein, the plan can be adjusted to further accommodate drainage and flood control needs. The preliminary plans can be further revised if necessary pursuant City of Rancho Cucamonga preliminary review processes as directed by the Client. Michael shall prepare a preferred preliminary lot layout and grading plan, based upon the Client's approval. This plan will be completed in CAD format, for use as the base in the Tentative Tract Map in Task 8.0 below and can be used for exhibit base map purposes in the proposed Specific Plan. The plan will include a preliminary interior street circulation system and appropriate access points to adjoining streets based on City requirements. Proposed preliminary interior street grades and limited lot elevations shall be shown to verify viability of project and number of lots and units that can be placed upon the site. Future street rights of way will be calculated with appropriate standards (width, curve radii and intersection spacing). Acreages of each planning area shall be P131 We Make a Difference Michael Baker International April 18, 2017 Sargent Town Planning — 147257 AWR 2 Page 4 identified. Consideration shall be given to the proposed conceptual storm drain layout, retention requirements, estimated grading quantities, corrective grading areas (based on the Soils Report provided by the Client), and earthwork balance and potential import requirements for flood protection. TASK 4.0 - PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE MASTER PLAN (NEIGHBORHOOD AREAS) 4.1 SITE VISIT, DATA COLLECTION, AND LITERATURE REVIEW Michael Baker will conduct a site visit to identify drainage patterns and features, including potential development constraints, particularly the project boundary conditions. Consultant shall collect available information/data including flood area mapping, existing drainage facility record drawings, and past flood -related studies. Michael Baker shall coordinate with Dudek and the reviewing agencies to verify requirements for the design of onsite drainage infrastructure. Michael Baker shall attend meetings and coordinate with local agencies as needed on a Time & Materials basis. 4.2 HYDROLOGIC ANALYSIS Michael Baker will perform a hydrologic analysis of onsite project areas in accordance with the standards and guidelines set forth by the local reviewing agency (City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino). Baseline (existing) and Project (proposed) conditions will be evaluated to ultimately determine the project -related flood hazard impacts. The hydrology will be limited to analyzing the 100 -year frequency storm events using either rational method or unit hydrograph procedures based on applicability. Based on the project land use plan and site plan, Michael Baker will compare the existing conditions to the proposed land use and identify any potential hydrologic impacts to the existing and proposed drainage patterns by calculating the runoff for the project 100 -year storm as defined by City and County requirements. This scope assumes that runoff volumes will be calculated for each neighborhood development area. The use of mitigation basins will be studied for any hydrologic impacts as allowed and recommended by the City. Calculations will be performed using City of Rancho Cucamonga and San Bernardino County acceptable programs and standards. The analysis results will be used to quantify impacts and determine conceptual sizes of proposed drainage facilities (as needed). 4.3 PROPOSED DRAINAGE FACILITIES AND SIZING Michael Baker will evaluate the drainage system requirements, determine the preliminary horizontal alignments of proposed drainage facilities based on normal depth calculations, estimate the size requirements for flood conveyance, develop conceptual designs and determine setback areas for regional drainage improvements. Unique structures and conceptual locations of flood mitigation and water quality features will be identified. P132 We Make a Difference Michael Baker International April 18, 2017 Sargent Town Planning — 147257 AWR 2 Page 5 Michael Baker will perform conceptual sizing of flood mitigation basins to determine the necessary onsite storm water storage volume, if mitigation is required, to attenuate project -related increases in peak flow rates down to the baseline conditions. 4.4 DRAINAGE REPORT Michael Baker will prepare a drainage report, which includes the technical basis and preliminary layout of required onsite backbone drainage facilities. Potential hydromodication issues associated with the proposed project will also be considered. This document will be suitable as the drainage technical basis for the Specific Plan, Tentative Tract Map and EIR. This scope specifically excludes any continuous simulation modeling. TASK 5.0 - MASTER CONCEPTUAL WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN Michael Baker shall prepare a Master Conceptual Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for the limits of the development area (neighborhood and conservation areas). This Master WQMP will be prepared consistent with the requirements of the NPDES program and the San Bernardino County NPDES (MS4) permit issued by the Santa Ana Regional Board for the Santa Ana River Watershed (NPDES Order R7-2010-0036 Permit No. CAS618036). Michael Baker will prepare a preliminary assessment of the pollutant of concern (POC) and expected pollutants generated from the proposed project. The Water Quality Management plan will consider mitigation for potential impacts to beneficial uses of the receiving waterbodies, needs to comply with water bodies with TMDLs, and Section 303(d) listed waterbodies. The Master WQMP approach will be consistent with the Master Plan of Drainage facilities (Task 4.0 above), and will include sustainable Best Management Practices (BMPs). The task for preparation of the Master Conceptual Water Quality Management Plan will include: Master BMP map exhibit, BMP O&M plans, and Draft Integrated WQMP document for agency review. TASK 6.0 - DEVELOPMENT AREA WATER AND SEWER STUDIES The development area, when annexed, will be under the purview of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD) for sewer and water service. Pursuant to preliminary information provided, it is understood that the project may consist of approximately 3,000 dwelling units, which would trigger the need for a Water Supply Assessment (WSA). An optional Task 7.0 is included to prepare a WSA based upon Cucamonga Valley Water District's 2015 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP), or latest UWMP for the development area. 6.1 DOCUMENT RESEARCH Michael Baker will research and utilize records of the City's water and sewer systems obtained from master plans, and other pertinent documents. P133 We Make o Difference Michael Baker International April 18, 2017 Sargent Town Planning — 147257 AWR 2 Page 6 6.2 MEETING AND COORDINATION For this task, an initial meeting with the City (Public Works Dept.) and CVWD to obtain documents and other pertinent information that would be of assistance in understanding the future water and sewer service for the project area. This task also includes coordination efforts between the Client and with Michael Baker for the planning stages of the Project. 24 hours of meeting time have been budgeted for this task. Additional meeting time can be provided on a time and materials basis. 6.3 WATER DEMAND AND WASTEWATER FLOW ESTIMATE Michael Baker will prepare water demand estimates projecting ultimate average, maximum -day, and peak hour flows under normal operating conditions, and coordinate with the governing fire authority to obtain the emergency fire flow requirements. It is our understanding that recycled water is not available in the area and that a separate non -potable irrigation system would not be required for the Project. Therefore, landscape demands will be included with the potable water system. We will also prepare wastewater flow estimates projecting ultimate average and peak flows. Michael Baker understands that an overall water and sewer demand estimate would be required for the initial Specific Plan document. As the project progresses, more specific areas, densities, and phases will be introduced to the project that will require detailed estimates. This task will assist in developing demands for ultimate buildout of the project. This scope excludes phasing of the project. 6.4 HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS (INITIAL MASTER PLAN) Michael Baker will perform an on-site analysis to determine the overall pipe sizing and circulation of the transmission mains within the major roadways of the Project area for water and sewer service for the Specific Plan document. This assumes an instantaneous model analysis performed under foreseeable critical operating conditions for the domestic water supply such as during peak summer demands, and emergency fire flow, to ensure adequate operation in compliance with City criteria and standards. Michael Baker will also perform analysis to verify pipe sizing and alignment for the proposed sewerage collection system to ensure adequate operation in compliance with City standards. This analysis assumes that no on-site treatment of potable or sewer flows will be required and that adequate capacity (water storage and sewer collection and treatment) is available for the project from CVWD. 6.5 SUMMARY REPORTS Michael Baker will summarize the findings of the hydraulic analyses for both the Initial Master Plan (Specific Plan document) and following conceptual planning studies. It is anticipated that two separate report documents will be provided; one for the sewer system and another for the water system. Each document report will include exhibits showing piping required for water and sewer distribution. Tables providing demands or flow estimates, and appendices to include computer analysis results and operating standards are included for both reports. P134 We Make a Difference Michael Baker International April 18, 2017 Sargent Town Planning — 147257 AWR 2 Page 7 TASK 7.0 - WATER SUPPLY ASSESSMENT (OPTIONAL TASK) The purpose of the "Water Supply Assessment Report" is to satisfy the requirements under Senate Bill 610 (Water Code Section 10910 et seq.) that adequate water supplies are or will be available to meet the water demand associated with the proposed development. SB 610 focuses on the content of a water supply agency's Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP). It also requires that an environmental impact report be performed along with the project to ensure that the water supply agency can meet the projected water demand associated with the project. SB 610 applies to residential development of 500 or more dwelling units as well as large commercial, industrial, or mixed-use development. The need for an assessment is determined by the lead agency of the project. Our experience indicates that each water purveyor addresses Water Supply Assessment (WSA) reports differently. Specifically, the level of legal involvement can likely affect progress. In certain cases, the agency will compile the WSA. Also, we have observed how water supply issues have been of increasing concern to agencies in recent years with respect to drought conditions. Critical to the preparation of the SB 610 report will be the ability to coordinate and obtain information to fully understand the future water supply plans of CVWD. The project is proposed as a planned residential development of approximately 3,000 dwelling units. Any development of 500 or greater dwelling units or equivalent to 500 units qualifies as a 'Project' under Water Code 10912 and requires a Senate Bill 610 ('Water Supply Assessment') report be prepared. Because the project is over the threshold, we anticipate that a Water Supply Assessment will be required. It is our experience that water agencies require that a WSA be created by an unbiased party. We have provided this optional scope items should the City not see any conflict of interest in allowing the developer's consultant to create the WSA. This task assumes one meeting with the City and CVWD to kick-off the study and/or gather necessary documentation, and one meeting with the City and CVWD during the review process. The report will be based on existing data and documents (most notably, CVWD's recently adopted 2015 Urban Water Management Plan), and does not include any hydrogeologic investigation. Michael Baker intends to compile the report strictly to meet the criteria of Senate Bill 610. Itis anticipated that this report will be stand-alone, although it may also be appended to the EIR document. The budget set forth in this proposal is based on a single review period for the report. This task excludes compliance with SB 221, which requires a water supply verification when a tract map, or parcel map or development agreement for a project is submitted to a land use agency for approval. SB 221 applies to residential development of more than 500 dwelling units with -some exceptions. Compliance of this code can be provided when the final tract map is developed for an additional scope and fee. P135 We Make a Difference Michael Baker International April 18, 2017 Sargent Town Plannina — 147257 A WR 2 Page 8 TASK 8.0 - TENTATIVE TRACT MAP PREPARATION Michael Baker shall prepare one Tentative Tract Map for conveyance purposes with the Specific Plan based on the preliminary lot layout and preliminary grading plan prepared in Task 3.0 above as approved by the Client. The tentative tract map will include proposed large neighborhood lotting as well as large lotting for open spaces, drainage areas, and other set aside areas. The maps will be prepared pursuant to the standards and requirements of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as well as the State Subdivision Map Act. The map will reflect the recommendations of the drainage, water quality management, and water and sewer studies prepared pursuant to Tasks 4.0, 5.0 and 6.0 above. The task includes the preparation and one set of revisions based on comments from the City. TASK 9.0 - PRELIMINARY EARTHWORK ANALYSIS Michael Baker shall prepare an earthwork quantity estimate and analysis based on the preliminary mass grading plan prepared in Task 3.0 or based on the tentative tract map prepared in Task 8.0 above, and adjust it as needed for on-site earthwork considerations. Task Exclusions The following tasks are either not required at this time, are being provided under separate contract or are being provided by others. Therefore, said tasks are excluded from Michael Baker's scope of services. 1. Property Title Search, Property Appraisal and Acquisition 2. Conditional Use Permit, Zone Change, Specific Plan Amendment and/or Area Plan 3. Boundary Survey, Record of Survey and ALTA Survey 4. Design of dry utilities (telephone, electric,•gas, cable TV and fiber optics) 5. Landscaping and Irrigation Plans 6. Water supply verifications 7. Computer Model Analysis of Sewer and Water Systems 8. Acoustical Studies 9. Focused biological surveys 10. Traffic Engineering reports or studies 11. Retaining wall design 12. Potholing of Existing Utilities 13. Archeologist & Paleontologist Certification 14. Geotechnical Investigation 15. Final engineering, improvement plans and final subdivision map 16. Legal Descriptions for easements or ROW dedications 17. Any other services not specifically set forth in the foregoing Scope of Services P136 We Make a Difference Michael Baker International April 18, 2017 Sar -gen t Town Planning — 147257 AWR 2 Page 9 Client Responsibilities The Client shall be responsible for providing to Consultant the following: 1. Current Site Plan in ACAD format 2. Access to Site and Owner archives. 3. Client is to provide any and all indemnification, abatement, disposal or other actions required by local, state or federal law regarding hazardous materials. 4. Client shall pay all governmental fees and costs. 5. Client will require any construction contractors to indemnify Michael Baker from any and all losses, damages, claims, expenses, including attorney's fees, and costs arising out of the contractor's work, excepting only losses, damages, claims, expenses including attorney's fees, and costs which are caused by the sole negligence or willful misconduct of Michael Baker in performing it's services under this agreement. Client will require that the construction contractors add Michael Baker (Consultant) as an additional insured in the comprehensive general liability, auto liability, workers' compensation and builders risk insurance coverage required by Client. P137 We Make o Difference Michael Baker International April 18, 2017 Sargent Town Planning — 14 725 7 AWR 2 Page 10 EXHIBIT B COMPENSATION BACKBONE PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS DESIGN Michael Baker shall be compensated for the Scope of Services described herein as follows: WORK TASK FEE Task 1.0 — Compile Record Boundary ............................................................................... $ 4,000 Task 2.0 — Aerial Topographic Mapping............................................................................. 67,000 Task 3.0 — Refined Preliminary Lot Layout and Grading Plan ............................................64,000 Task 4.0 — Preliminary Drainage Master Plan (Neighborhood Areas) ................................ 33,000 Task 5.0 — Master Conceptual Water Quality Management Plan .......................................16,000 Task 6.0 — Development Area Water and Sewer Studies ...................................................42,000 Task 7.0 — Water Supply Assessment (Optional Task) ......................................................18,000 Task 8.0 — Tentative Tract Map Preparation...................................................................... 25,000 Task 9.0 — Preliminary Earthwork Analysis................................................................... 3,500 Subtotal $ 272,500 Reimbursable Budget (-2.0%) $ 5,500 Task 3.0 Contingency 30,000 TOTAL FEE $ 308,000 Progress billings will be forwarded to the Client monthly based on a percent complete for each task, not to exceed the total fee authorized for this project, plus all direct costs advanced by Michael Baker. The Client shall make every reasonable effort to review invoices within (15) working days from the date of receipt of the invoices and notify Michael Baker in writing of any particular item that is alleged to be incorrect. The fees proposed herein shall apply until July 1, 2018. Due to ever-changing costs, Michael Baker will increase those portions of the contract fee for which work must still be completed after July 1, 2018 by 5% annually. Reimbursables include blueprinting, overnight mail services, airline fares, plotting (including in- house check plots and prints) and delivery services. P138 We Make a Difference Michael Baker International April 18, 2017 Sargent Town P! nnir? — 147257 A WR 2 Ea9f, 11 EXHIBIT C SITE LIMITS (revised development site plan from Sargent Town Planning on 4/17/17) Revised Conceptual Neighborhood Plan Development Prionry Area R� SA RG EN T Rmh Exrnn Sp.—Anmpbm Sm M Flan STAFF REPORT DATE: July 19, 2017 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: VJnho R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: n C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Ed Diaz, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO RESCIND THE IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DRC2012-01065 LOCATED AT 8628 & 8604 HICKORY AVENUE. ALSO, APPROVE THE IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DRC2016-00466 LOCATED AT 8628 & 8604 HICKORY AVENUE, BETWEEN ARROW ROUTE AND WHITTRAM AVENUE RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Engineer to rescind the Improvement Agreement for DRC2012-01065 and release the Faithful Performance and Labor & Materials bonds (Bond #41242761). It is also recommended that City Council approve the Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for DRC2016-00466. BACKGROUND: On March 25, 2013, the City Planner approved DRC2012-01065 to allow site improvements for an outdoor storage facility on a 4.77 -acre site located on the west side of Hickory Avenue and south of Arrow Route at 8628 and 8604 Hickory Avenue. DRC2012-01065 was approved subject to a condition that certain public improvements be constructed along the project's frontage. In 2013, the City accepted an Improvement Agreement and Bond #41242761 to secure the construction of the public improvements required for DRC2012-01065 and satisfy the condition of approval. At some point, the developer, All -State Paper & Metal Recycling Co., Inc., pursuant to DRC2012-01065 ceased operating on the subject property. The public improvements were never built, and the City still holds the improvement agreement and security. On February 22, 2017, the Planning Commission approved DRC2016-00466 to allow construction of a 215,600 square foot warehouse building on three parcels totaling 9.5 acres located on the west side of Hickory Avenue, between Arrow Route and Whittram Avenue, which includes the subject property. This project was also conditioned to construct the same public improvements that were required for DRC2012-01065. On May 17, 2017, the owners of the subject property submitted a letter requesting release of improvement security for DRC2012-01065 and requesting that the City rescind the existing improvement agreement. The owners' representative has informed the City that the release is required by the financial institution financing the purchase of the project. Page 1 of 2 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT — DRC2012-01065 AND DRC2016-00466 July 19, 2017 P140 The City Council is scheduled to consider approval to authorize the City Engineer to rescind the improvement agreement and release bonds for DRC2012-01065 at its regular meeting on July 19, 2017. The new developer of the property, Hickory Avenue Industrial Owner, L.P., is submitting an Improvement Agreement, the Faithful Performance, and Labor & Materials bonds in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond #674027485 $237,000 (Bond No.) Labor and Materials Bond #674027485 $237,000 (Bond No.) ANALYSIS: Approval by the Council would authorize the City Engineer to rescind the improvement agreement and allow the release of the Bonds #41242761 which are connected with DRC2012-01065. This would facilitate the sale of the subject property and the ultimate development of the warehouse project allowed by DRC2016-00466. The new developer of the property, conditioned with DRC2016-00466, will enter into a new improvement agreement and provide the necessary securities to finalize the construction of the public improvements. FISCAL IMPACT: None. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Not applicable. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 — Vicinity Map Attachment 2 — Letter Requesting to Release DRC2012-01065 Page 2 of 2 Vicinity Map NOT TO SCALE P141 A ATTACHMENT n a D Homecoming Church St 4- 8 0 � m at Terra Vista w Miller Ave Bass Pro Shops yarn ±° U e v O < ? Victoria Gardens a a u� s� Chdtc v=a Dr j ® 2-f�\ �• N✓Liberty Py.vrY S ��`OP Histo! is We 66 Hismnc Rte 66 ® E Foothill Blvd a Ln o R — b 1 Q a 3 n r, 14 Arrow Route Arrow Route Arrow Row Arrow Route Arr. ® Site le\acN R Whilttarn Av< nrarn Ave Kaiser m u Slh St D � , Cc bile a Etiwanda 0 n Q Generating Station t m Napa St Y j Auto Club Speedwayio y m rthy- (y D D !C rn 3 rs fj 611 yt aRan n A _ m 0 A fz;urtl. �� ® fourth St Fourth St San Bernardino Ave San Hernardo\o Ave Home Depot Regional a D AMC DINE -IN �.;. Distribution Center a ntano Mills 300 IM nruours St o ii Ontario Millso = T > � o ® ` Valrey Blvd a Mills Pkwy Ontario Mi Is Pkwy D Valley Blvd l'aaet 10 0 E3 0 ® 0 ® iv E Airport Or F Airport Dr Salver Ave Slover Ave stove w i Y A ® n N 9 K 0 U m D Q FONTANA t - 3 i7 1 7 n c GATEWAY g D n n F Santa Ana 51 E Santu Ana S1 Santa lma Are San A ATTACHMENT OAKMONT INDUSTRIAL GROUP ■ May 17, 2017 City of Rancho Cucamonga Attention: Building and Safety Services Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 To whom it may concern: P142 In connection with the attached new Grading Agreement for the project identified by Plan Check PMT 2016-04760 and located at 8570 Hickory Avenue (along with the corresponding Faithful Performance Bond issued to the City in the amount of $932,740), we are writing this letter to request: (1) the release of the previous Faithful Performance Bond (for DRC2012-01065 — Bond No. 41242761) and Labor and Materialmen Bond (for DRC2012-01065 — Bond No. 41242761) issued to the City by the previous landowner; and (2) the termination of that certain Improvement Agreement for DRC2012-01065 entered into by and between the City and the previous landowner. * Copies of the previous Faithful Performance and Labor and Moterialmen Bonds issued by the previous landowner along with the Improvement Agreement entered into by and between the City and the previous landowner are provided. Sincer , Greg Po el Vice President ■ 3520 Piedmont Road ■ Suite 100 ■ Atlanta, GA 30305.404-869-9990 ■ Fax 404-869-9996 ATTACHMENT 2 P143 ISE PREMIUM IS PREDICATED ON YOUR COPY rHE FINAL CONTRACT PRICE ANJECT ISSUED IN THREE ORIGINAL COUNTERPARTS S S'JI3NO. TO 9122427427ADJUS1 BOND N0. 61 COUNTERPART N0. OF PREMIUM: $740.00 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND FOR DRC2012-01065 (1) All State Paper & Metal Recycling Co., Inc. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, and{1� STATE-RECY4GLi G7 (hereinafter designated as "principal") have entered into an agreement whereby principal agrees to install and complete certain designated public improvements, which said agreement, dated , and identified as project DRC2012-01065 is hereby referred to and made a part hereof; and, WHEREAS, said principal is required under the terms of said agreement to furnish a bond for the faithful performance of said agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, we the principal and Platte River insurance Company as surety, are held and firmly bound unto the City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter called "City"), in the penal sum of Seventy-four thousand Dollars ($74,000.00) lawful money of the United States, for the payment of which sum well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, successors, executors and administrators, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. The condition of this obligation is such that if the above bounded principal, his or its heirs, executors, administrators, successors or assigns, shall in all things stand to and abide by, and well and truly keep and perform the covenants, conditions and provisions in the said agreement and any alteratlon thereof made as therein provided, on his or their part, to be kept and performed at the time and in the manner therein specified, and in all respects according to their true intent and meaning, and shall indemnify and save harmless City, its officers, agents and employees, as therein stipulated, then this obligation shall become null and void; otherwise, it shall be and remain in full force and effect. As a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to the face amount specified therefore, there shall be included costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorney's fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing such obligation, all to be taxed as costs and included in any judgment rendered. The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the agreement or to the work to be performed thereunder or the specifications accompanying the same shall in anywise affect its obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the agreement or to the work or to the specifications. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been duly executed by the principal and surety above named, on se tember 24, 2013 All State Paper & Metal Recycling Co., Inc. (Principal) (Signature) Platte River Insurance Company (Surety) 2121 N. California Blvd., Suite 300 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 (Surety's Address) (Attorney in Fact) Julia B_ Gladding PLEASE ATTACH POWER OF ATTORNEY TO ALL BONDS SIGNATURES MUST BE NOTARIZED MUST BE COMPLETED IN TRIPLICATE PLATTE RIVER INSURANCE COMPANY 41242761 ISSUED IN THREE ORIGINAL COUNTERPARTS POWER OF ATTORNEY COUNTERPART NO. _ OF BOND NO. 41242761 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, That the PLATTE RIVER INSURANCE CON'IPANY, a corporation of the State of Nebraska, having its principal offices in the City of Middleton, Wisconsin, does snake, constitute and appoint LIA B GLADDING; KENNETI I A. COATE------- - - its true and lawful Attorneys}in-fact, to make, execute, seal and deliver for and on its behalf, as surety, and as its act and deed, any and all bonds, undertakings and contracts of suretyship, provided that no bond or undertaking or contract of suretyship executed under this authority shall exceed in amount (lie sum of --------------- ------------------- ALL WRITTEN INSTRUMENTS IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED: S5,000,000----•------------ -----.... .......... .... This Poker of Attorney is granted and is signed and sealed by facsimile under and by the authority of the following Resolution adopted by the Board of Directors of PLATTE RIVER INSURANCE COMPANY at a meeting duly called and held on the 81h day of January, 2002. "RESOLVED, that the President, and Vice -President, the Secretary or Treasuret, acting individually or otherwise, be and they hereby are granted the power and authorization to appoint by a Power of Attorney for the purposes only of executing and attesting bonds and undertakings and other writings obligatory in the nature thereof, one or more vice-presidents, assistant secret arim, d,?utorney(s)-in-fact, each appointee to have the powers and duties usual to such offices to the business of the Corporation; the signature c tars and the seal of the Corporation may be affixed to such power of attorney or to any certificate relating thereto by facsimile, and o ver of attorney or certificate bearing such facsimile signatures or facsimile seal shall be valid and binding upon the Corporation in the Fut fre with respect to any bond or undertaking or other writing obligatory in the nature thereof to which it is attached. Any such appointment may be revoked, for cause, or without cause, by any of said officers, at any time." IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the PLATTE RIVER INSURANCE COMPANY has caused these presents to be signed by its officer undersigned and its corporate seat to be hereto affixed duly attested, this 2nd day of May, 2011. Attest, PLATTE RIVER INSURANCE COMPANY �4, cGarORAre Richard 1V. Allen III a SEAL David F Pauly President CEO & President Surety & Fidelity Operations STATE OF WISCONSIN ' AEBRASKR' COUNTY OF DANE On the 2nd day of May, 2011 before roe personally came David F Pauly, to me known, who being by me duly sworn, did depose and say that he resides lathe Countyof Dane, State of Wisconsin, that lie is President of PLA'T'TE RIVER INSURANCE COMPANY, the corporation described herein and which executed the above instrument, that he knows the seal of the said corporation; that the seal affixed to said instrument is such corporate seal; that it was so affixed by order of the Board of Directors of said corporation and that he signed his name thereto by like order. DANIEL w. �( KRUEGER �� STATE OF WISCONSIN•,/: Daniel 1V• Krueger SS .4r Notary Public, Dane Co., WI COUNTY OF DANE CERTIFICATE My Commission Is Permanent 1, the undersigned, duly elected to the office stated below, now the incumbent in PLATTE RIVER INSURANCE COMPANY, a Nebraska Corporation, authorized to make this certificate, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing attached Power of Attorney remains in full force and has not been revoked; and furthermore, that the Resolution of the Board of Directors, set forth in the Power of Attorney is now in force. Signed and sealed at the City of Middleton, State of Wisconsin this _ day of —SEP 24 2013 2 ./ SEAL, 1� Alan S. Ogilvie Secretary THIS DOCUMENT IS NOT VALID UNLESS PRINTED ON GREEN SHADED BACKGROUND WITH A RED SERIAL NUMBER IN THE UPPER RIGHT HAND CORNER. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS CONCERNING THE AUTHENTICITY OF THIS DOCUMENT CALL 800-475-4450. PR -POA (5-11) P145 C�Q���OL R90Q Q�d=pN��POO �� Q�G3G90O t'�JC CDD C�f,�1C�l�i State of California County of Riverside On SEP 24 2013 before me, Stephanie D. Fishery Notary Public Dvo Hare Insert Nem. and Title d she o icer personally appeared Julia B. Gladding Name(s) of Srgner(s) who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the personf} whose name(e) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that STEPHANIE D. FISHER 4ie/she/" executed the same in-His/herltlieir authorized COMM. #20289 capacity(-ies), and that by I=tfe/her/Meir signatureM on the NOTARYPUBUC instrument theerson p (ej, or the entity upon behalf of sJune18,son which the personfey acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official/ al. Pace NolarySeat Abovra Sigh/nature Sign f ry copy OPTIO Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. Description of Affached Docvrae�if Title or Type of Document: Document Date: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: none capacity(les) Claimed by Signer(s) Signer's Name: Julia B. Madding ❑ Individual ❑ Corporate Officer — Title(s): ❑ Partner —❑ Umited ❑ GeneraliR: .� LJ Attorney in Fact e ❑ Trustee Top of thumb here ❑ Guardian or Consel vator ❑ Othe,: Signer Is Representing: Number of Pages: Signer's Name: ❑ Individual ❑ Corporate Officer — Title(s): ❑ Partner —❑ Limited ❑ General ❑ Attorney in Factr 7re ❑ Trustee Top of thumb ❑ Guardian or Consel vator ❑ Other: Signer Is Representing: 02007 National Notary Association•9350DeSolo Ave, POBox 2002•Chatsworin,CA91313-2402•www.NationalNotaryorg Item95907 Reorder. Cal Toit•Free1-800.876.6827 YOUR COPY ISSUED IN THREE ORIGINAL COUNTERPARTS COUNTERPART NO. ._ OF !-HE PREMIUM IS PREpII'.ATEU�N THE FINAL CONTRACT PRICE ANC BOND NO. 41242761 5SUBJECT TOAr1!IJSTVFNT PREMIUM: INCLUDED IN THE PREMIUM CHARGED FOR THE PERFORMANCE BOND CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LABOR AND MATERIALMEN BOND FOR DRC2012-01065 (1) Al: S[.ate Paper & Metal Recycling Co., Inc. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, and &TATE-RE-C-YCLiNC5, (hereinafter designated as "principal') have entered into an agreement whereby principal agrees to install and complete certain designated public improvements, which said agreement, dated and identified as project DRC2012-01065 is hereby referred to and made a part hereof, and WHEREAS, under the terms of said agreement, principal is required before entering upon the performance of the work, to file a good and sufficient payment bond with the City of Rancho Cucamonga to secure the claims to which reference is made in Title 15 (commencing with Section 3082) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code of the State of California. NOW, THEREFORE, said principal and the undersigned as a corporate surety, are held firmly bound unto the City of Rancho Cucamonga and all contractors, subcontractors, laborers, material men and other persons employed in the performance of the aforesaid agreement and referred to in the aforesaid Code of Civil Procedure in the sum of Seventy-four thousand dollars ($74,000.00), for materials furnished or labor thereon of any kind, or for amounts due under the Unemployment Insurance Act with respect to such work or labor, that said surety will pay the same in an amount not exceeding the amount hereinabove set forth, and also in case suit is brought upon this bond will pay in addition to the face amount thereof, costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorney's fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing such obligation, to be awarded and fixed by the court, and to be taxed as costs and to be included in the judgment therein rendered. It is hereby expressly stipulated and agreed that this bond shall inure to the benefit of any and all persons. companies and corporations entitled to file claims under Title 15 (commencing with Section 3082) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code, so as to give a right of action to them or their assigns in any suit brought upon this bond. Should the condition of this bond be fully performed, then this obligation shall become null and void, otherwise it shall be and remain in full force and effect. The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of said agreement or the specifications accompanying the same shall in any manner affect is obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension, alteration or addition. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been duly executed by the principal and surety above named, on September 24, 2013 All State Paper & Metal Recycling Co., Inc. Platte River Insurance Company (Principal) (Surety) 2121 N. California Blvd., Suite 30-0 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 (Signature) (Surety's Add ss) �Co4 ttorney in Fact) ,7ulia B. Gladding PLEASE ATTACH POWER OF ATTORNEY TO ALL BONDS SIGNATURES MUST BE NOTARIZED MUST BE COMPLETED IN TRIPLICATE PLATTE RIVER INSURANCE COMPANY 41242762 ISSUED IN THREE ORIGINAL COUNTERPARTS POWER OF ATTORNEY COUNTERPART NO. _ OF _ BOND NO. 41242761 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, That the PLATTE RIVER INSURANCE COMPANY, a corpomlion of the State of Nebraska, having its principal offices in the City of Middleton, Wisconsin, does make, constitute and appoint ULIA B. GLADD[NG, KENNETH A. COA its true and lawfu[ Attorneys) -in -fact, to make, execute, seal and deliver for and on its behalf, as surety, and as its act and decd, any and all bonds, undertakings and contracts of suretyship, provided that no bond or undertaking or contract of suretyship executed under this authority shall exceed in amount the sum of ALL WR1Ti-EN INSTRUMENTS 1N AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED: $5,000,000 --------- This Power of Attorney is granted and is signed and sealed by facsimile under and by the authority of the following Resolution adopted by the Board of Directors of PLATTE RIVER INSURANCE COMPANY at a uice(ing duly called and held on the 8th clay of January, 2002. "RESOLVED, that the President, and Vice -President, the Secretary or Treasurer, acting individually or otherwise, be and they hereby are granted the power and authorization to appoint by a Power of Attorney for the purposes only of executing and attesting bonds a�dertakings and other writings obligatory in the nature thereof, one or more vice presidents, assistant secretaries and attorncy(s)-in-fact h o e to have the powers and duties usual to such offices to the business of the Corporation; the signature of such officers and (lie setrLoranon may be affixed to such power of attorney or to any certificate relating thereto by facsimile, and any such power of attorney or certif ate bearing such facsimile signatures or facsimile seal shall be valid and binding upon the Corporation in the future with respect to any bond or undertaking or other writing obligatory in the nature thereof to which it is attached. Any such appointment may be revoked for cause, or without cause, by any of said officers, at any time." IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the PLATTE RIVER INSURANCE COMPANY has caused these presents to be signed by its officer undersigned and its corporate seal to be hereto affixed duly attested, this 2nd day of May, 2011. Attest: ulw PLATTE RIVER INSURANCE COMPANY FiNsu ti CANPON.Irp C� �� 7T Richard W. Allen !II a 71 ���� David F. Pauly President CEO & President Surety & Fidelity Operations STATE OF WISCONSIN S.S. NEen,.sO' COUNTY OF DANE } "0.sattrs, On the 2nd day of May, 2011 before ine personally came David F. Pauly, to me known, who being by me duly sworn, did depose and say: that Ice resides in the County of Dane, State of Wisconsin, that lie is President of PLATTE RIVER INSURANCE COMPANY, the corporation described herein and which executed the above instrument, that he knows the seal of the said corporation; that the seal affixed to said instrument is such corporate seal; that it was so affixed by order of the Board of Directors of said corporation and that Ice signed his name thereto by like order. ORNIEL I • Daniel W. Krueger STATE OF WISCONSIN S S: -•,. Notary Public, Dane Co, WI COUNTY OF DANE CERTIFICATE My Commission Is Permanent i, the undersigned, duly elected to the office stated below, now the Incumbent in PLATTE RIVER INSURANCE COMPANY, a Nebraska Corporation, authorized to make this certificate, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that clic foregoing attached Power of Attorney retrains in full force and has not been revoked; and furthermore, that the Resolution of the Board of Directors, set forth in ilia Power of Attorney is now in force. Signed and sealed at the City of Middleton, State of Wisconsin this day of SEP 24 9011 2 - SEAL Alan S Ogilvie Secretary THIS DOCUMENT IS NOT VALID UNLESS PRINTED ON GREEN SHADED BACKGROUND WITH A RED SERIAL NUMBER IN THE UPPER RIGHT HAND CORNER. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS CONCERNING THE AUTHENTICITY OF THIS DOCUMENT CALL 800-475-4450. PR -POA (5.11) P148 Cd LDEFORMBA, AD L-PURP052: AGG3E�©�9d�DC�6 1�G7�i cK`' � •r - - - .mac � r - .ems - - .rc r .��.�..�,BSc.�r..�.;Krzrxr.�;c;c��r•��'i"�•i��fiS�=�c'fic'zr.<:e�c<:c State of California County of Riverside y On SEP 24 2013 before me, Stephanie D. Fisher Notar Public Dale ere nserl Name and sae of the Olfcer personally appeared . Jul i a B. Claddi�ng�� T Name(s) of Signer(s) who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the persons} whose namGW ish, a subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that 4re/she/fey executed the same in-I9is/herAheir authorized STEPHANIE D. FISHER capacity(feq), and that by 43is/herfteir signatures) on fhe COMM. #2028911, instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of "'�• NOTARYPUBLIC • which the persor*s acted, executed the instrument. MY comm. 18, 2017 I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official eal. Signature Place Notary Seal Above Y n olan Public OPTIONAL Though the information below is not required by lath, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. Description of Aiached Docltrr ont Title or Type of Document: Document Date: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: none Capacify(ies) Claimed by Sigiiar(s) Signer's Name:. Julia B. G1 addi ng ❑ Individual ❑ Corporate Officer —Title(s): ❑ Partner —❑ Limited ❑ General IN Attorney in Fact' a t� )• r ❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: Signer Is Representing Top of thumb here Number of Pages: Signer's Name: ❑ Individual ❑ Corporate Officer — Title(s): ❑ Partner —❑ Limited ❑ Genera; ❑ Attorney in Fact i�, •lo �Q ❑ Trustee Top of thumb here ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: Signer Is Representing: 02007 National Notary Association • 9350 De Solo Ave. P.C. Box 2402 • Chatworth, CA 91313.2402 • wwwNatlonalNotaryorg :len 95907 Reorder Call To.l-Frno 1.800.878-8827 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT FOR DRC2012-01065 s «:. THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into, in conformance with the provision of the Municipal Code and Regulations, of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as the City, by and between said City, and ALL -STATE RECYCLING, hereinafter referred to as the All -State Recycling. WITNESSETH: THAT, WHEREAS, said All -State Recycling desires to develop certain real property in said City as shown on the conditionally approved project known as DRC2012-01065; and WHEREAS, said City has established certain requirements to be met by said All -State Recycling as prerequisite to approval of said DRC2012-01065 generally located 8628 & 8604 HICKORY AVENUE; and WHEREAS, the execution of this agreement and posting of improvement security as hereinafter cited, and approved by the City Attorney, are deemed to be equivalent to prior completion of said requirements for the purpose of securing said approval. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by said City and by said All -State Recycling as follows: 1. The All -State Recycling hereby agrees to construct at All -State Recycling's expense all improvements required by the conditions of approval of said Project including, but not limited to the improvements described on the estimate for bond purposes (Exhibit "A") attached hereto, within twelve months from the effective date hereof. 2. This agreement shall be effective on the date of the resolution of the Council of said City approving this agreement. This agreement shall be in default on the day following the first anniversary date of said approval unless an extension of time has been granted by said City as hereinafter provided. 3. The All -State Recycling may request an extension of time to complete the terms hereof. Such request shall be submitted to the City in writing not less than 60 days before the expiration date hereof, and shall contain a statement of circumstances necessitating the extension of time. The City shall have the right to review the provisions of this agreement, including the construction standards, estimate for bond purposes and, improvement security, and to require adjustments therein if any substantial change has occurred during the term hereof. 4. If the All -State Recycling fails or neglects to comply with the provisions of this agreement, the City shall have the right at any time to cause said provisions to be met by any lawful means, and thereupon recover from the All -State Recycling and/or his surety the full cost and expense incurred 5. The All -State Recycling shall provide metered water service to each lot of said development in accordance with the regulations, schedules, and fees of the Cucamonga Valley Water District. 6. The All -State Recycling shall be responsible for replacement, re8628 & 8604 Hickory Avenue, or removal of any component of any irrigation water system in conflict with construction of required improvements to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the owner of such water system. DRC2012-01065 P150 All -State Recycling 8889 Etiwanda Ave Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 7. Improvements required to be constructed shall conform to the Standard Drawings and Standard Specifications of the City, and to the Improvement Plan approved by and on file in the office of the City Engineer. Said improvements are tabulated on the Construction and Bond Estimate, hereby incorporated as Exhibit "A" hereof, as taken from the improvement plans listed thereon by number and/or project name. The All -State Recycling shall also be responsible for construction of any transitions or other incidental work beyond the project boundaries as needed for safety and proper surface drainage. Errors or omissions discovered during construction shall be corrected upon the direction of the City Engineer. Revised work due to said plan modifications shall be covered by the provisions of this agreement and secured by the surety covering the original planned works. 8. Construction permits shall be obtained by the All -State Recycling from the office of the City Engineer prior to start of work; all regulations listed thereon shall be observed, with attention given to safety procedures, control of dust, noise, or other nuisance to the area, and to proper notification of public utilities and City Departments. Failure to comply with this section shall be subject to the penalties provided therefore. 9. The All -State Recycling shall be responsible for removal of all loose rocks and other debris from public rights-of-way within or adjoining said development resulting from work relative to said development. 10. Work done within existing streets shall be diligently pursued to completion; the City shall have the right to complete any and all work in the event of unjustified delay in completion, and to recover all cost and expense incurred from the All -State Recycling and/or his contractor by any lawful means. 11. Said All -State Recycling shall at all times following dedication of the streets and easements in said project or up to the completion and acceptance of said work or improvement by said City Council, give good and adequate warning to the traveling public or each and every dangerous condition existent in said street or easement, and will protect the traveling public from such defective or dangerous conditions. Until the completion of all improvements required by the conditions of approval of said project including, but not limited to, the improvements herein incorporated on Exhibit 'A" to be performed, each of said streets not accepted as improvements shall be under the charge of said All -State Recycling. Said All -State Recycling may close all or a portion of any street subject to the conditions contained in a temporary street closure permit, issued by the City Engineer, whenever it is necessary to project the public during the construction of the improvements herein agreed to be made. 12. Parkway trees required to be planted shall be planted by the All -State Recycling after other improvement work, grading and cleanup has been completed. Planting shall be done as provided by Ordinance in accordance with the planting diagram approved by the City Community Development Director. The All -State Recycling shall be responsible for maintaining all trees planted in good health until the end of the guaranteed maintenance period, or for one year after planting, whichever is later. 13. The All -State Recycling is responsible for meeting all conditions established by the City pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act, City Ordinances, and this agreement for the development, and for the maintenance of all improvements constructed thereunder until the improvement is accepted for maintenance by the City, and no improvement security provided hereinwith shall be released before such acceptance unless otherwise provided and authorized by the City Council of the City. 14. This agreement shall not terminate until the maintenance guarantee security hereinafter described has been released by the City, if applicable, or until a new agreement together with the required improvement security has been submitted to the City by a successor to the herein named, and 2 DRC2012-01065 P151 by resolution of the City Council same has been accepted, and this agreement and the improvement security therefore has been released. 15. The improvement security to be furnished by the All -State Recycling with this agreement shall consist of the following and shall be in a form acceptable by the City Attorney: A. To secure faithful performance of this agreement. A bond or bonds by one or more duly authorized corporate sureties in the form and content specified by Government Code Section 66499.1. 2. An Improvement Security Instrument in the form and content specified by the City Attorney. 3. A deposit with the City of money or negotiable bonds of the kind approved for securing deposits of public monies. B. To secure laborers and materialmen: 1. A bond or bonds by one or more duly authorized corporate sureties in the form and content specified by Government Code Section 66499.2. 2. An Improvement Security Instrument in the form and content specified by the City Attorney. 3. A deposit with City of money or negotiable bonds of the kind approved for securing deposits of public monies. C. The required bonds and the principal amounts thereof are set forth on page 5 of this agreement. 16. The All -State Recycling warrants that the improvements described in this agreement shall be free from defects in materials and workmanship. Any and all portions of the improvements found to be defective within one (1) year following the data on which the improvements are accepted by the City shall be repaired or replaced by All -State Recycling free of all charges to the City. The All -State Recycling shall furnish a maintenance guarantee security in a sum equal to ten percent (10%) of the construction estimate or $200.00, whichever is greater, to secure the faithful performance of All -State Recycling's obligations as described in this paragraph. The maintenance guarantee security shall also secure the faithful performance by the All -State Recycling of any obligation of the All -State Recycling to do specified work with respect to any parkway maintenance assessment district. Once the improvements have been accepted and a maintenance guarantee security has been accepted by the City, the other improvement security described in this agreement may be released provided that such release is otherwise authorized by the Subdivision Map Act and any applicable City Ordinance. The actual principal amount required of said Maintenance Guarantee Security is set forth on page 5 of this agreement. 17. That the All -State Recycling shall provide or cause to be provided and maintain such public liability and property damage insurance as shall protect him and any contractor or subcontractor performing work covered by this agreement from claims for property damages which may arise because of the nature of the work or from operations under this agreement, whether such operations be by himself or by any contractor or subcontractor, or anyone directly or indirectly employed by said persons, even though such damages be not caused by the negligence of the All -State Recycling or any contractor or subcontractor, or anyone directly employed by said persons, even though such damages be not caused by the negligence of the All -State Recycling or any contractor or subcontractor or anyone 3 DRC2012-01065 P152 employed by said persons. The public liability and property damage insurance shall list the City as additional insured and directly protect the City, its officers, agents and employees, as well as the All - State Recycling, his contractors and his subcontractors, and all insurance policies issued hereunder shall so state. The minimum amounts of such insurance shall be as follows: A. Contractor's liability insurance providing bodily injury or death liability limits of not less than $500,000 for each person and $2,000,000 for each accident or occurrence, and property damage liability limits of not less than $250,000 for each accident or occurrence with an aggregate limit of $500,000 for claims which may arise from the operations of the All -State Recycling in the performance of the work herein provided. B. Automobile liability insurance covering all vehicles used in the performance of this agreement providing bodily injury liability limits of not less than $500,000 for each person and $1,000,000 for each accident or occurrence, and property damage liability limits of not less than $250,000 for each accident or occurrence, with an aggregate of not less than $500,000 which may arise from the operations of the All -State Recycling or his Contractor in performing the work provided for herein. 18. That before the execution of this agreement, the All -State Recycling shall file or cause to be filed with the City a certificate or certificates of insurance covering the specified insurance. As evidence of understanding the provisions contained herein, and of intent to comply with same, the All -State Recycling has submitted the following described improvement security, and has affixed his signature hereto: 4 DRC2012-01065 FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND Type of surety: Name, address and phone number of surety: Type of surety: Principal Amount: MATERIAL AND LABOR BOND Name, address and phone number of surety: Type of surety: FUTURE Principal Amount: MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE Name, address and phone number of surety: Principal Amount: P153 TO BE POSTED PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE CITY $74,000.00 $74,000.00 10% DRC2012-01065 IN WITNESS HEREOF, and acknowledged with all signatures. Date Recyc.._ P154 the parties hereto have caused these presents to be duly executed formalities required by law on([_ motes s9eforth opposite their Date by Recycling �Signature`' L-rA Printed Signature Printed ALL -STATE RECYCLING'S SIGNATURE MUST BE NOTARIZED AND COMPLETED IN TRIPLICATE All -State All -State 6 DRC2012-01065 ACCEPTED: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION By: Date: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Attest: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk Approved: City Attorney Date: Date: DRC2012-01065 P155 P156 CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT CIVIL CODE § 1189 State of California County of s;;o Bernardino i On 77/ 0-013efore me, Jason G. Thomas, Notary Public Date —�—� /Hare arced Name and Title o1 the Officer personally appeared " L(M5 L�yi @MYCOJASON G THOMAS Commission # 1980253 MM Notary Public - California z San Bernardino County . Expires Jun 27, 2016 Placa Notary Seal Above .•. who proved. to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) Ware subscribed to within Instrument ana acKnowieageo ahIme that he/they executed the same in hi he er/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by erAheir signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signa6ire 0106tary Public Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document I - Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: _Tm (b VGtm,,,4— Document Date: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: _ Capacity(fes) Claimed by Signer(s) Signer's Name: ❑ Corporate Officer — Title(s): ❑ Individual ❑ Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General Top of thumb here ❑ Attorney in Fact ❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: Signer Is Representing: Signer's Name: Number of Pages: ❑ Corporate Officer — Title(s): ❑ Individual ❑ Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General Top of thumb here ❑ Attorney in Fact ❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator O Other: Signer Is Representing: 0 2010 National Notary Association • Nalionaftlary.org • 1.800 -US NOTARY (1-8b0.878-6827) Item 85907 P157 EXHIBIT "All ENGINEERING DIVISION ESTIMATE FOR BOND PURPOSES Project No.:DRC2012-01065 Engineering Reference No.: ROW2013-00534 Quantity Unit Activity Unit Price Amount 0 8 EA Landscape Tree 15 Gallon $100.00 $800.00 47 SF Removal of AC Pavement $0.50 $23.50 331 LF Street Curb & Gutter 08" $12.00 $3,972.00 43 LF Street Berm AC $6.00 $258.00 1,324 SF Street Sidewalk PCC 04" $2.50 $3,310.00 5,875 SF Street Subgrade Preparation/Fine Grading $0.35 $2,056.25 55 TN Street Aggregate Base $15.00 $825.00 334 SF Street Drive Approach Commercial $4.00 $1,336.00 60 TN Street AC (500 to 900 tons) $45.00 $2,700.00 3 EA Street Lights $1,000.00 $3,000.00 307 LF Traffic Pavement Striping $1.00 $307.00 1 EA Traffic Pavement Markings $5.00 $5.00 4 EA Traffic Street Sign $200.00 $800.00 346 LF Utility Underground Existing Electrical $130.00 $44,980.00 SUBTOTAL: $64,372.75 CONTINGENCY (15%): $9,655.91 TOTAL ESTIMATE: $74,028.66 FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND (100%): $74,000.00 LABOR AND MATERIAL BOND (100%): $74,000.00 MONUMENTATION (CASH) SURETY: N/A Refer to: `Pursuant to City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Title 12, Chapter 03, Section .130, a cash restoration / delineation deposit shall be made prior to issuance of an Engineering Construction Permit. 09/04/13 STAFF REPORT DATE: July 19, 2017 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Mason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Matthew Addington, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE A CORRECTIVE QUIT CLAIM DEED FOR PURCHASE OF RIGHT-OF-WAY LOCATED AT 7745 VINEYARD AVENUE RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached corrective quit claim deed for the purchase of right-of-way located at 7745 Vineyard Avenue. BACKGROUND: On November 1, 1989 the City Council approved to open escrow for the purchase of a portion of the property located at 7745 Vineyard Avenue from Feliz B. Quesada, owner of the property, to construct the Pacific Electric Trail and the underlying storm drain and sewer utilities. A grant deed for the conveyance of the needed right-of-way was recorded on December 21, 1989 as Document No. 89-497056. A member of the Quesada Family Trust recently contacted staff seeking assistance with resolving an error in the 1989 Deed. The Trust is currently in escrow to sell the property but has been informed that escrow cannot close until the error is resolved. ANALYSIS: After researching the request, staff determined that an error in the legal description included with the 1989 Deed conveyed the entire property to the City instead of the portion needed for the Pacific Electric Trail Project. In order to resolve the error, staff has prepared the attached corrective deed. Upon approval of the quit claim deed by the City Council, staff will forward it to the owner's escrow company for recordation. FISCAL IMPACT: None. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: None. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 — Vicinity Map Attachment 2 — Quitclaim Deed Attachment 3 — City Escrow/Recording Instructions for Corrective Deed Page 1 of 1 Vicinity Map NOT TO SCALE P159 A ATTACHMENT Lemon Ave Lenton Ave a A l.Mon Ave C 201h S © 2 D 0 m M ® Foothill Fwy ® no ® Foothill Fwy �m�sw .00 St t 9th SI 19th SI 19111SI 19th St 19th 5 t5G u` m D o 2 NamiRan St co;onirft �t a $ y a u MMonte Vista $T Yewpalnl 0 (� roma A Lu Vinett i.n `line Si La Vine St c � © 0 0 = 3. E :6th St Ba::e Line Rd ALTA LOMA Base Line Rc z z A ST L T5Tl, ST 3 Palo Aho S n d D 7 Z Cantly D `m m ,� m , E•4th St ;r a n Church St Cir IP ' syn` o Site rw Q D San Bernardino Rd ' T 56 EFooftlf lvd' li,7or E Foolhvl <Ivd Hi.^.lurk Rte 66 c Historic Rte z z cr rc Rte C a m o n a 9 n } u a 66 n' pnmy D e D D o nO1M or C Atow Ivy Arrow Route m Arrov. Route o f n L F 41h R p 'n 9 A ,5l i° 25Th St Jersey 8'c d Feron Blvd 241h St :n 0 S! F. Bth 5! Z E 8th St 8ih Sl E BID Sl 8th St BUt St n T 17) 2 E01 va St < n_ o < q' m 3 D ti D E7th St m 71h St £' ' 7th St c ry Z a D D z a E 6th St 61h St 61h Sl 6th SI m 'ePn, D E Ham home St fD = Q D v S ' 3 c i y E Slh S[ %�c C 511131 L 5Th St a a o S F Princeton St © < ' E Harvard r' 9 Z E4111St < m E 41h St fourth St Fnurll• St C-) n in A ATTACHMENT RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO, AND SEND PROPERTY TAX INVOICES/STATEMENTS TO: The Quesada Family Trust c/o Joanna Averett, Trustee 1752 E. Lugonia Ave, Suite 117-300 Redlands, CA 91762 9,4 SPACE Portion of 208-091-44 P160 This transfer is exempt from Documentary Transfer Tax (transfer for no consideration, to correct error in previous deed), and exempt from Recording Fees pursuant to California Government Code Section 6103. QUITCLAIM DEED The CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA a Municipal Corporation under the laws of the State of California, does hereby REMISE, RELEASE AND FOREVER QUITCLAIM to JOANNA AVERETT, as trustee of the Quesada Family Trust, all of its right, title and interest in, under and to that certain real property located in the County of San Bernardino, State of California, more particularly described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Quitclaim Deed as of the date set forth below. Dated: .2017 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA By: Print Name: Title: APPROVED AS TO FORM: LM James Markman, City Attorney ATTACHMENT 2 P161 A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. State of California County of Riverside On , before me, (insert name and title of the officer) Notary Public, personally appeared , who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature (Seal) P162 EXHIBIT "A" Legal Description THAT CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: A PORTION OF LOT 6, SUBDIVISION "C" CUCAMONGA VINEYARD TRACT, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 21 OF MAPS, PAGE 67, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 6, WHICH IS NORTH 0 DEGREES 12 MINUTES EAST, 320.37 FEET FROM THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 6; THENCE NORTH 0 DEGREES 12 MINUTES EAST ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 6, 133.3 FEET; THENCE EAST 386.49 FEET TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC RAILWAY RIGHT OF WAY; THENCE SOUTH 41 DEGREES 27 MINUTES WEST ALONG THE SAID WESTERLY LINE OF RIGHT OF WAY, 177.79 FEET; THENCE WEST 268.3 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM BOTH: A. THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT BY DEED RECORDED JUNE 3, 1963, IN BOOK 5920, PAGE 427 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, AND B. THE FOLLOWING IRREGULARLY-SHAPED PARCEL DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL DISTANT 10 FEET WESTERLY FROM THE MOST EASTERLY CORNER OF SAID PARCEL; THENCE EASTERLY TO SAID EASTERLY CORNER; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT RIGHT OF WAY TO THE POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTHWESTERLY BOUNDARY OF THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC RAILROAD COMPANY RIGHT OF WAY; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID PARCEL A DISTANCE OF 14 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. richard richords (1916-1988) glenn r. watson (1917-2010) ha1.gershon 719n-2007) Steven I. dorsey William I. sirausz gregory w. stepanicich quinn m. barrow carol w. lynch gregorym. kunert thomas m. limbo robert c. ceccon kevingg. ennis robin d. hams michael estrada laurence s. wiener b. tilden kim saskia t. asamura kayser o. sume peter m. thorson James I; markman Craig a. steele t. peter pierce terence r. bogs lisa bond roxanne m. diaz Jim g. grayson roy a. clarke michael f. yoshiba regina n. danner Paula gutlerrez baeza bnice w. galloway diana k. chuang Patrick k. bobko david m. snow lolly a. enriquez ginetta 1. giovinco lnsha ortiz candice k. lee Jennifer petrusis steven I. flower toussaint s. bailey am greyson deborah r. hakman d. craig fox maricela e. marroqufn serita r. young finder khalsa Whitneyg. mcdonald Sean b. gibbons stephanie cao Patrick d. skahan Stephen d. lee youstina n. aziz Brendan kearns kyle h. brochard nicholas r. ghirelli isra shah isaac m.rosen romtin parvaresh andrew r, contreiras casey strong steven a. nguy marvin e. bornlla bennett a.givens lee a. kaplan of counsel mitchell e. abbott rochelle browne teresa ho-urano diana h. varat son tranclsco office telephone 415.421.8484 orange coun office telephone 714 .9 0.0 901 temecula office telephone 951.695.2373 110,4►11 RICHARDS I WATSON I GERSHON etre ATTORNEYS AT LAW -A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 355 South Grand Avenue, 40th Floor, Los Angeles, California 90071-3101 Telephone 213.626.8484 Facsimile 213.626.0078 P163 DRAFT CITY ESCROW/RECORDING INSTRUCTIONS FOR CORRECTIVE DEED '2017 VIA PDF TO BENGELC@CTT.COM Chicago Title Company 560 E. Hospitality Lane San Bernardino, CA 92408 Attn: Carol Bengel, Title Officer Escrow No. RC3789-JZ Ladies and Gentlemen: This letter constitutes the escrow instructions of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ("City"), in connection with a Quitclaim Deed (the "Deed") executed by the City to correct a previous deed that mistakenly conveyed too much property to the City. It is our understanding that the Quesada Family Trust has opened the above escrow in order to sell property and requires the Deed in order to close the sale. 1. DOCUMENT. The following executed and acknowledged document is to be delivered to you by the City: (i) The Deed executed by the Successor Agency and acknowledged. (ii)[ 1 [?] 2. RECORDING INSTRUCTIONS. Provided that all of the conditions set forth in Section 3 (below) have been satisfied, you shall record the Deed in the Official Records of San Bernardino county, and deliver a copy of the Deed (showing recording information) to the City c/o Matthew Addington at City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730. central coast office telephone 805.439.3515 3. CONDITIONS PRECEDENT TO CLOSING. You are hereby authorized to record the Deed in the Official Records when and only when the above escrow and sale of the property by the Trust will close. 11231-0001 \2081072v 1.aoc ATTACHMENT 3 RICHARDS I WATSON I GERSHON ATTORNEYS AT LAW -A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION Chicago Title Company , 2017 Page 2 4. OTHER MATTERS. P164 4.1 You shall notify Matthew Addington at (909) 477-2710 Ext. 4202 when you have received confirmation that the Deed has been recorded in the Official Records and the sale of the property by the Trust has closed. 4.2 The City shall not be responsible for any fees or costs. 4.3 If you cannot comply with all of the foregoing by p.m. on 2017, you are not authorized to record any documents or deliver any funds; in such event, you shall call the undersigned without delay. 4.4 These instructions may be changed or revoked at any time by oral instructions from the undersigned, to be followed by written confirmation. 4.5 Your recordation of the Deed in the Official Records shall be deemed acceptance of these instructions by you and your irrevocable agreement to comply therewith; however, we request that you sign and return (via email/pdf to bgalloway@rwglaw.com) a copy of this letter indicating its acceptance of and agreement to comply with all of the instructions set forth in this letter. Very truly yours, Bruce Galloway of Richards, Watson & Gershon Counsel to City cc: Ms. Jamie Zapcic (Escrow Officer; by email/PDF) Mr. Matthew Addington (by email/PDF) 11231-0001 \2081072v l .doc Chicago Title Company , 2017 Page 3 RICHARDS I WATSON I GERSHON ATTORNEYS AT LAW -A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND AGREEMENT P165 The undersigned acknowledges and agrees that (1) the persons executing this Acknowledgment and Agreement on behalf of Chicago Title Company as is duly authorized to do so; and (2) Chicago Title Company will act in accordance with the foregoing escrow instructions. Dated: , 2017 11231-0001\2081072vl.doc CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY 0 Carol Bengel, Title Officer STAFF REPORT DATE: July 19, 2017 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: JJo�ohhn R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: 'J'ason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Ed Diaz, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO ACCEPT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS EAST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE AND NORTH OF ARROW ROUTE FOR TRACT 18870 AS COMPLETE, FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION, AND AUTHORIZE RELEASE OF BONDS RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Approve and accept the public improvements required for the development of Tract 18870 and authorize the City Engineer to file the appropriate Notice of Completion; 2. Release Faithful Performance Bond #929598532 and accept Maintenance Bond #929598532-M for the associated public improvements; and 3. Authorize the City Engineer to approve the release of the Maintenance Bond one year following the filing of the Notice of Completion if the improvements remain free from defects in material and workmanship. BACKGROUND: Tract 18870 was approved by the Planning Commission on September 18, 2014, for the development of 125 single family residences on the north side of Arrow Route east of Etiwanda Avenue. This approval included conditions to construct certain public improvements including street, landscape, and storm drain improvements. Developer: Lennar Homes of California, Inc. 980 Montecito Drive, Suite 302 Corona, CA 92879 Release: Faithful Performance Bond Accept: Maintenance Bond ANALYSIS: #929598532 $897,500 (Bond No.) #929598532-M $ 89,750 (Bond No.) All public improvements required of this development have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The public improvements will be re -inspected in approximately nine months to ensure they remain in good order prior to release of the maintenance bond. Page 1 of 2 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT — TRACT 18870 P167 July 19, 2017 FISCAL IMPACT: Not applicable. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: ENHANCING PREMIER COMMUNITY Enhancing premier community status through the construction of public street improvements including ac street pavement, curb and gutter, sidewalks, street lights, residential driveway approaches, storm drains and landscape improvements within Tract 18870. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 — Vicinity Map Page 2 of 2 P168 Vicinity Map Historic Rle 66 Historic Rle Project Site _ o n s W c � y ® ? < Y a ro � q !> Arrow Route Arrow Route Arrow Route Arrow Route d� glrrl L C fat `? �o Whitlrarn Ave Willtram Ave Q a, 8th S1 j O� Etiwanda Generating Station o Yapo St Auto Club Speedway Q } 60; S, a m C D ro 5r 6th St n y o - z N m � - .0 � 4 > 4 > ;p e ro Fourth St ® Fourth St rourti, st San Bernard no +a:e San Bernardino Ave Home Depot Regional o Cl) AC DINE -IN Distribution Center 3 Cr Bio Mills 300 C" Concours s't Q z a > Dntario Mills o > D � m _ ro ® a Valley Blvd Oma` ,Ito Md.s Pkv;, Ontario Mills Pkwy n Valley Blvd eD W E Airport Or E Airport Or Salver Ave Slover Ave 0 o71 Cr o o d 3 m MONTANA H y c K ® c GATEWAY 1 g a b K N Nrp n < ® U < N m �p E Santa Ana St E Santa Ana Si Santa Ana Ave N ATTACHMENT 1 STAFF REPORT DATE: July 19, 2017 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BV�ason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Ed Diaz, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO ACCEPT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS ALONG ARCHIBALD AVENUE, RAMONA AVENUE, LA VINE STREET, AND THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC TRAIL FOR TRACT 18912 AS COMPLETE, FILE THE NOTICE OF COMPLETION AND AUTHORIZE RELEASE OF BONDS RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Approve and accept the public improvements required for the development of Tract 18912 and authorize the City Engineer to file the appropriate Notice of Completion; 2. Release Faithful Performance Bond #929621331 and accept Maintenance Bond #30015803 for the associated public improvements; and 3. Authorize the City Engineer to approve the release of the Maintenance Bond one year following the filing of the Notice of Completion if the improvements remain free from defects in material and workmanship. BACKGROUND: On September 16, 2015, City Council approved an improvement agreement for Tract 18912 along Archibald Avenue, Ramona Avenue, La Vine Street, and the Pacific Electric Trail. This approval included conditions to construct certain public improvements including street, landscape, and storm drain improvements. Developer: D.R. Horton, Los Angeles Holding Co., Inc. 2280 Wardlow Circle Suite 100, Corona, CA 92880 Release: Faithful Performance Bond Accept: Maintenance Bond ANALYSIS: #929621331 $184,100 (Bond No.) #30015803 $ 18,410 (Bond No.) All public improvements required of this development have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The public improvements will be re -inspected in approximately nine months to ensure they remain in good order prior to release of the maintenance bond. Page 1 of 2 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT — TRACT 18912 P170 July 19, 2017 FISCAL IMPACT: None. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: ENHANCING PREMIER COMMUNITY Enhancing premier community status through the construction of new decomposed granite trail along Pacific Electric Trail with additional improvements to existing landscape. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 — Vicinity Map Page 2 of 2 Vicinity Map NOT TO SCALE P171 A ATTACHMENT eqr n �Iniageq. Lemon Ave . error r. z > If," :i F a > � s Y � nc L FaolhlllFwy ® no ® 11D ® FOatN ®• ® FaoihitlFrry ® � 6 NY1rpy 19Jtst 191nSI t7,)V. I, IArkar I D 4 © 3 > 3 nHannon St v,cr4 0 a r - c '�5 D > m ;+t' victoria Park In rtonte vista S A _ F3 ® La Vine St la Vine Si La GRAPELAND Project Site ALTA LOW Central Park � a Base l me Rd Base Line 3A Base Line Rd n � c m - Parc ARo St j. e ICOD VataPkwy r CanCewo� .`n m NN•-� — Church Sl C6 we �s, ' > yC,e"r D omecomng s n Hn Church Sl s r Qat Terra Vista Bass Pro Shopso h �' ve Victoria Gardenso M� " 4 41AChar[hsr, "0."A a' Sm aen wvuatc Rd Rancho a rhurhSi Historic Ric 66 _ Cucamonga = n.stonc W 6 ry Historic Rte 66 fl storic fit 66 e ,. 3 A De an S; rr f DSR 4 OD�G � 9 Arrow Route Airow R Moor Roule - A E'nh Sr O D ; ^ 761h St = $vd z -q @ •s r ean?md 75 h St �;h 7� Jersey ehd z Jeo 4 z m r� e E sin St ath Si as si '_ re. at St > O Etiwanda = Generating SlationO > 71h S: 7th Sr 3 i n 5%M :rhst 6Jr5• 6lt St A ATTACHMENT P172 STAFF REPORT DATE: July 19, 2017 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager 41 INITIATED BY:. .8son C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Fred Lyn, Utilities Division Manager SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO RELEASE MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND NO. 491029P IN THE AMOUNT OF $451,664, FOR THE FY 2014-2015 HAVEN AVENUE ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION LINE EXTENSION PROJECT, CONTRACT NO. 15-055 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond No. 491029P in the amount of $451,664, for the FY 2014-2015 Haven Avenue Electric Distribution Line Extension Project, Contract No. 15-055. BACKGROUND: Contract No. 15-055 consisted of the construction of a complete electric distribution substructure system on Haven Avenue between 6 1 Street and 8th Street. The substructure system includes trench, conduit, concrete substructures, backfill, concrete encasement and surface restoration. ANALYSIS: The completed improvements were accepted by the City Council on July 6, 2016. Following City Council acceptance, the contractor provided a maintenance bond for the duration of one year, for 10% of the contract price as required by the contract. The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. As such, it is recommended that the maintenance bond be returned to the contractor. Contractor: G.A. Technical Services Inc. 1224 W. 9th Street Upland. CA 91786 FISCAL IMPACT: The completed improvements added 4,000 feet of underground vaults to our existing backbone system RCMU Capital Funds. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: None. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 — Vicinity Map RCMU electric and dark fiber conduits and 12 new . Construction of these improvements was funded by Page 1 of 1 UPLAND PRO. IR l:'T LOCATION ONTARIO P173 7th StREEr CITY OF RANCIIO CUCAMONGA � � �•. 1 HAVEN AVENUE ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION LINE EXTEI\tiI0N 4 ' (Uh -,LreeL to 6LIi �LreeL) NTS ATTACHMENT 1 P174 STAFF REPORT DATE: July 19, 2017 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Felicia Marshall, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE AN IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR DRC2015-00804, LOCATED AT 10348 ALMOND STREET. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Approve the subject public improvement agreement on file with the City Clerk and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the agreement; 2. Accept improvement securities in the form of cash. BACKGROUND: DRC2015-00804 was approved by the Planning Director on July 18, 2016, for the construction of a two story, single-family residence on 0.51 acres located in the Very Low (VL) Residential District, Hillside Overlay District, at 10348 Almond Street. This approval included conditions to construct certain public improvements including a driveway approach, landscape improvements, and a street light. ANALYSIS: The developer, Bindu Varghese, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance: Labor & Material FISCAL IMPACT: None. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Not Applicable. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 — Vicinity Map $2,100.00 Cash — Receipt #279226 $2,100.00 Cash — Receipt #279226 Page 1 of 1 Vicinity Map NOT TO SCALE P175 Tackstei A ATTACHMENT can Valley Qr ro n C nd St Almond St � Ri'gsten ID Pr? jecfSit`e U nJ? ® Almond St fD American m Gar( ti OG Material Handling Hidden Farm Rd GNM Trucking a) Cr ❑ p m c?° 0 Understated Carran St Whisper)^°' goutider t s Vista Grove St Vista Grove St Hillside o Community Church a)S Ridge Can nloch Farm <t^r°"dr�dge� c� A ATTACHMENT P177 STAFF REPORT DATE: July 19, 2017 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Jphn R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Jason C. Welday, Engineering Services Director/City Engineer Ed Diaz, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO RELEASE MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND NO. 800028352 IN THE AMOUNT OF $13,640, FOR TRACT 16324 AT THE NORTH END OF WARDMAN BULLOCK ROAD. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond No. 800028352 in the amount of $13,640, for Tract 16324 at the North end of Wardman Bullock Road. BACKGROUND: Tract 16324 was approved by the Planning Commission on May 12, 2004 as a residential subdivision of 63.5 acres into 123 lots for single-family development, within the very low residential district of the Etiwanda North specific plan, located at the Northerly end of Wardman Bullock Road. This approval included conditions to construct certain public improvements including street, landscape, and storm drain improvements. ANALYSIS: The completed improvements were accepted by the City Council on December 7, 2005. Following City Council acceptance, the contractor provided a maintenance bond for the duration of one year, for 10% of the contract price as required by the contract. The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. As such, it is recommended that the maintenance bond be returned to the contractor. Contractor: Meritage Homes of California, INC 1250 Corona Pointe Court, Suite 200 Corona, CA 92879 FISCAL IMPACT: None. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: ENHANCE PREMIER COMMUNITY Enhancing premier community status through the construction of public street improvements including ac street pavement, curb and gutter, and street lights along Wardman Bullock Road leading into the development of new residential homes within Tract 16324. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 — Vicinity Map Page 1 of 1 w Project Site n 11�21 3 p o a Wilson Ave r - n Vicinity Map NOT TO SCALE 9.eg na Or 49 DvrrOrrr�a Copley Drive 2to m 2to Smokestone St m , m c+ C A Q Etiwanda High School Actorla Sl vi: coria Sr T m Wilson Ave GtMY°n �a0 061epao,D lu 7> d 4 V NO r � ash Or gd�eQ A a n M Frontage Rd I << n S Hlghland Ave Va:tona .st N ATTACHMENT 1 P178 P181 STAFF REPORT DATE: July 19, 2017 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: William Wittkopf, Public Works Services Director Dean Rodia, Parks and Landscape Superintendent SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE RENEWAL OF CONTRACT CO 16-148 WITH BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERVICES, INC. FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF PARKS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 1 (LMD-1) IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $314,000. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended the City Council approve Amendment No. 001 to contract CO 16-148 with BrightView Landscape Services extending the term of the contract to June 30, 2018 in an amount not to exceed $314,000 for FY 2017-2018. BACKGROUND: BrightView Landscape Services, Inc. is one of three landscape contractors used by the City to provide maintenance services at various landscape sites citywide. On June 15, 2016, City Council approved a competitively bid contract with BrightView Landscape Services, Inc. for maintenance of parks within LMD- 1. BrightView has submitted a Letter of Intent expressing their desire to continue providing services to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for FY 2017/2018 with a 5% increase to cover increased costs to provide landscape maintenance services. Increasing labor costs are the largest factor behind the requested rate increase. The minimum wage in California increased $0.50 on January 1, 2017. Shortly thereafter, the prevailing wage for a landscape maintenance laborer increased by the same amount from $10.47 to 10.97 per hour, a 4.8% increase. As the minimum wage will increase an additional $0.50 (4.8%) on January 1, 2018, it is anticipated the prevailing wage will again match the increase during the term of this contract extension. The cost of fuel, materials, and equipment repairs have also increased to a lesser extent over the past year. ANALYSIS: BrightView Landscape Services has proven their competence to perform the scope of services outlined within the contract. Staff believes the requested increase is reasonably warranted and if the City were to rebid the contract, it would most likely experience the same or greater increase from other vendors. Therefore, staff recommends Council approve Amendment No. 001 extending the term of the contract to June 30, 2018 in an amount not to exceed $314,000. FISCAL IMPACT: The 5% increase is in line with the proposed FY 2017/2018 budget for LMD-1 in contract services. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: None. ATTACHMENTS: None. Page 1 of 1 P182 REPORT DATE: July 19, 2017 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: William Wittkopf, Public Works Services Director/ �xox Dean Rodia, Parks and Landscape Superintendent SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE RENEWAL OF CONTRACT CO 2012- 009 WITH BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERVICES, INC. FOR MAINTENANCE OF PARKWAY, PASEO AND MEDIAN LANDSCAPES WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS 1, 2,4R AND 5 (LMDs 1, 2,4R, AND 5) IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $1,801,000. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended the City Council approve Amendment No. 007 to contract CO 2012-009 with BrightView Landscape Services, Inc. extending the term of the contract to June 30, 2018 in an amount not to exceed $1,801,000 for FY 2017-2018. BACKGROUND: BrightView Landscape Services, Inc. is one of three landscape contractors used by the City to provide maintenance services at various landscape sites citywide. On March 21, 2012, City Council approved a competitively bid contract with BrightView Landscape Services, Inc. for the maintenance of parkway, paseo and median landscapes within LMDs 1, 2, 4R and 5. BrightView has submitted a Letter of Intent expressing their desire to continue providing services to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for FY 2017/2018 with a 5% increase to cover increased costs to provide landscape maintenance services. Increasing labor costs are the largest factor behind the requested rate increase. The minimum wage in California increased $0.50 on January 1, 2017. Shortly thereafter, the prevailing wage for a landscape maintenance laborer increased by the same amount from $10.47 to 10.97 per hour, a 4.8% increase. As the minimum wage will increase an additional $0.50 (4.8%) on January 1, 2018, it is anticipated the prevailing wage will again match the increase during the term of this contract extension. The cost of fuel, materials, and equipment repairs have also increased to a lesser extent over the past year. ANALYSIS: BrightView Landscape Services has proven their competence to perform the scope of services outlined within the contract. Staff believes the requested increase is reasonably warranted and that if the City were to rebid the contract, it would most likely experience the same or greater increase from other vendors. Therefore staff recommends Council approve Amendment No. 007 extending the term of the contract to June 30, 2018 in an amount not to exceed $1,801,000. Page 1 of 2 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT - FY 2017/2018 RENEWAL OF THE ANNUAL CONTRACT WITH P183 BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPES, INC., FOR MAINTENANCE OF PARKWAY, PASEO AND MEDIAN LANDSCAPES WITHIN LMDS 1, 2,41Z, AND 5 JULY 19, 2017 FISCAL IMPACT: The 5% increase is in line with the proposed FY 2017/2018 budget for LMDs 1, 2, 4R and 5 for contract services. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: None. ATTACHMENTS: None. Page 2 of 2 STAFF REPORT DATE: July 19, 2017 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: William Wittkopf, Public Works Services Director Ty Quaintance, Facilities SuperintendenrERENEWAL SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE T OF THE ANNUAL CONTRACT FOR CITYWIDE HVAC&R MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR SERVICES WITH EMCOR SERVICES/MESA ENERGY SYSTEMS IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $390,000. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended the City Council approve Amendment No. 002 to contract CO 16-114 with EMCOR Services/Mesa Energy Systems to extend the term of the contract to June 30, 2018, update the equipment schedules, and add maintenance of HVAC controls to various locations, in an amount not to exceed $390,000 for FY 2017-2018. BACKGROUND: On April 20, 2016, City Council accepted the bids received and awarded contract CO 16-114 for Citywide HVAC&R maintenance and repairs to EMCOR Services/Mesa Energy Systems with an option to renew in one year increments by mutual consent of the contractor and City. If approved, Amendment 002 to contract CO 16-114 will extend the term of the contract to June 30, 2018, update the equipment schedules, and add maintenance of HVAC controls to various locations. ANALYSIS: EMCOR/Mesa has submitted a Letter of Intent expressing their desire to continue providing service to the City of Rancho Cucamonga during 2017/2018 with no rate increases. EMCOR/Mesa provides great service for the City and is very knowledgeable of all the City's HVAC&R equipment. Staff recommends Council approve the renewal of contract 16-114 effective July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018 in the amount not to exceed $390,000. An additional $45,000 for HVAC&R maintenance and repair services for Fire District facilities will be considered separately by the Fire Board. FISCAL IMPACT: The contract price is within the contract services budget line items in City general funds approved for 2017/2018. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: None. ATTACHMENTS: None. Page 1 of 1 P184 P185 REPORT DATE: July 19, 2017 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager 1 INITIATED BY: William Wittkopf, Public Works Services Director( Ty Quaintance, Facilities Superintendent Kenneth Fung, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO RELEASE THE MAINTENANCE BOND FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A FAMILY RESTROOM AT LOANMART STADIUM. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release Maintenance Bond No. CSB0008122 in the amount of $6,488 for the "Construction of a Family Restroom at LoanMart Stadium at the Epicenter Project", Contract No 16-020. BACKGROUND: On February 3, 2016, the Council awarded a contract to New Millennium Construction Services, Inc. for the "Construction of a Family Restroom at LoanMart Stadium at the Epicenter Project" and accepted the project as complete on July 6, 2016. This project's scope of work consisted of the construction of a family restroom along the first base side of the LoanMart Stadium, between the existing men's and women's restrooms. ANALYSIS: The required one-year maintenance period ended on July 6, 2017. The improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. Contractor: New Millennium Construction Services, Inc. 4158 Lugo Avenue Chino Hills, CA 91709 FISCAL IMPACT: None. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: None. ATTACHMENTS: None. Page 1 of 1 P186 REPORT DATE: July 19, 2017 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/ d inistrative Services Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director Noah Daniels, Finance Manager t.1->" SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING AN ANNUAL LEVY FOR THE COSTS INCURRED IN THE COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 93-1 (MASI PLAZA) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017/18. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution approving the annual levy for the costs incurred in the collection of assessments within Assessment District No. 93-1 (Masi Plaza) (the "District") for Fiscal Year 2017/18. BACKGROUND: On August 4, 1997, the City issued $2,990,000 in bonds pursuant to the Improvement Bond Act of 1915 Division 10 of the California Streets and Highways Code. All the proceedings of the City to form the District, to levy the assessments and to acquire the improvements described and being financed with the proceeds of the bonds had been undertaken pursuant to the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913, Division 12 of the California Streets and Highways Code, and Resolution of Intention No. 97-104 adopted by the City Council of February 19, 1997. The District, comprised of approximately 23.64 acres, is located along the south side of Foothill and the west side of Rochester and consists of 25 developed lots subject to assessment. Annually, prior to the County's direct assessment enrollment deadline in August, the City Council will be requested to adopt a resolution approving the levy of assessments as reflected in the respective Annual Status Report for the District. Accordingly, for the upcoming Fiscal Year 2017/18 levy, the City Council's approval is recommended prior to the August 10, 2017 submittal deadline to the County of San Bernardino, for the assessments to be included in the upcoming tax roll. Although the City Council has previously authorized the formation of the District, the bonded indebtedness, and the maximum assessment levy within the boundaries of the District, the actual annual assessment to be levied must be authorized on an annual basis. Page 1 of 2 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CONSIDERATION TO ESTABLISH ANNUAL LEVY FOR ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 93-1 JULY 19, 2017 Page 2 ANALYSIS: The annual assessment for the District is sufficient to pay for the public facilities and services, the principal, interest, and other periodic costs for the bonded indebtedness associated with the District. All the costs related to the District are costs of the District, not the City nor its General Fund. Thus, all costs related to administering the District and paying debt service on the bonds are the responsibility of the property owners within the District. Additionally, the outstanding indebtedness of the District is not an obligation of the City. The annual assessment will be applied to all parcels within the District. The assessment shall be levied until the bonds issued by the District mature. Pursuant to Section 8682 of the Government Code, the City is authorized to collect an annual assessment fee of a maximum 5% of the amount of installments and not to exceed $16 per parcel assessment for costs incurred from the administration and assessment collections associated with the District. The table below summarizes the levy for the District for Fiscal Year 2017/18: Assessment District Pro osed Assessment Le Notes 93-1 (Masi Plaza) $ 244,562 No change from prior year. The assessments noted in the Annual Status Report for the District are net of estimated delinquencies for budgetary purposes. In cases of delinquency and foreclosure, the parcels will be subject to penalties. If approved, City staff will file the certified list of all parcels subject to the assessment levy with the County of San Bernardino no later than the County's August 10, 2017 submittal deadline. Adoption of the resolution will provide for the Fiscal Year 2017/18 levy upon the parcels within the District that are not otherwise exempt from taxation for Fiscal Year 2017/18. FISCAL IMPACT: The District is separate from the City General Fund. The assessment revenues that are collected for the District are used for the related services, debt service payments, and administration costs for only the District. COUNCIL GOAL ADDRESSED: There is no City Council Goal addressed. The process of approving the assessment levy for the District is required by the Improvement Bond Act of 1915. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 01 — Resolution No. 17-059 Attachment 02 — Annual Status Report Page 2 of 2 P187 P188 RESOLUTION NO. 17-059 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE -AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF AN ASSESSMENT SURCHARGE FOR THE EXPENSES INCURRED IN THE COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS IN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 93-1 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has heretofore undertaken proceedings pursuant to the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913" being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, and has confirmed assessments upon land within various special assessment districts (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "District"); and WHEREAS, said proceedings provided for and the City did subsequently issue bonds pursuant to the "Improvement Bond Act of 1915", being Division 10 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said bonds representing unpaid assessments within the District; and WHEREAS, the City does incur necessary administrative expenses in the collection of the annual installments of the assessment within the District; and WHEREAS, Government Code Section 8682 does authorize the City to establish an assessment surcharge to allow the City to recover its expenses of collection of said assessments; and WHEREAS, the City desires to establish such an assessment surcharge as authorized by said Government Code Section 8682. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: Treasurer is hereby directed to add to the annual installment of assessments within the District a maximum of five percent (5%) of the amount of the installments and of the interest thereon, not to exceed the Treasurer's estimate of the expenses of collection. Said expenses of collection shall include the necessary administrative expenses of the City incurred in providing the County Auditor with current information regarding the ownership or division of the affected lots or parcels of land within the District to ensure the proper entry by the County Auditor in his or her assessment roll and the timely collection of the Assessment installments. SECTION 3: The above assessment surcharge, when collected, shall belong to the City and shall cover the expenses and compensation of the Treasurer incurred in the collection of the assessments, and of the interest and penalties added on to the assessments. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 19th day of July, 2017. Resolution No. 17-059 — Page 1 of 1 ATTACHMENT #01 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 93-1 MASI PLAZA ANNUAL STATUS REPORT JULY, 2017 P189 Resolution No. 17-059 "achmed # 02. P190 Resolution No. 17-059 BACKGROUND On August 4, 1997, $2,990,000 in bonds were issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California (the "City") pursuant to the Improvement Bond Act of 1915 Division 10 of the California Streets and Highways Code (the "Bond Law"). All the proceedings of the City to form the Assessment District No. 93-1 Masi Plaza (the "Assessment District"), to levy the assessments and to acquire the improvements described and being financed with the proceeds of the bonds had been undertaken pursuant to the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913, Division 12 of the California Streets and Highways Code (the "Improvement Act"), and Resolution of Intention No. 97-104 adopted by the City Council of February 19, 1997. The Assessment District, comprising approximately 23.64 acres, is situated along the south side of Foothill and the west side of Rochester and consists of twenty-five (25) developed lots subject to assessment. Proceeds of the bonds were used to acquire certain streets, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, street lighting, traffic signal, water, sewer, storm drainage, public amenities and certain public utility improvements, constructed within the Assessment District and necessary for the existing and proposed development within the Assessment District. The method of assessment for the Assessment District was determined by the Assessment Engineer. The acquisition costs and proportionate share of the incidental costs for bid items were spread on a net assessable acreage basis to those areas of subareas of the Assessment District that specifically benefited from the works of improvements to be acquired. The Assessment Engineer determined that the special benefits received from the above cited works of improvements were in direct proportion to the number of assessable net acres of the record lots. The assessments were spread over all parcels within the boundary based upon its proportion of the total assessable acreage within the Assessment District. Net assessable acreage for all lots within the Assessment District was taken directly from the "per lot" net acreage shown on the recorded parcel without offset for easements. Section 8682 of the Government Code authorizes cities to collect an annual assessment fee of a maximum five percent (5%) of the amount of installments and not to exceed sixteen dollars per parcel assessment for the costs incurred in the administration and assessment collection. The requested fee will allow the City to recover funds for collection and management of the Assessment District that are applicable to the Improvement Bond Act of 1915. The City's comprehensive management program including record keeping, cost management, payoff calculations, monthly financial reports, debt service schedules, as well as providing information to the public is funded from this fee. This fee is in place now to pay for administration and will allow the City to maintain the current rate and level of service. The assessment shall be levied only so long as required for each parcel of taxable property to discharge bond obligations. Assessment District No. 93-1, Masi Plaza 1 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #02 P191 Resolution No. 17-059 The following is a list of businesses located within the Assessment District: Building Phase Lot 1 2 3 Apn Tenants 1 22901211 Valvoline Instant Oil Change 2 22901212 Shell Service Station and Seven Eleven 3 22901213 4 1 4 22901214 5A 1 5 22901215 5B 1 5 22901215 6 1 6 22901216 7 1 7 22901217 8 1 8 22901218 9 1 9 22901219 10 1 10 22901220 11 II 11 & 27 22901230 12A 12B 13 14 15A 15B 16A 16B 16C 18A 18B 19A 19B 20 24 25 26 27 12 22901221 12 22901221 13 22901222 14 22901223 15 22901224 15 22901224 16 22901231 16 22901231 16 22901232 20 22901266 21 22901264 18 & 19 22901267 17 & 18 22901268 22 22901269 24 22901261 25 22901235 26 22901236 11 &27 22901230 Jack in the Box Taco Hut, Popeye's Chicken, Boba and Water, one Empty Suite, and Manila Sunset Grille GEN Korea Barbecue, Gards Music Abi Sabi Teppan Steak House & Sushi Bar Denny's Restaurant Creamistry, #1 Pho Noodle & Grill, Barbershop and two Empty Suites Goodyear Tires Quality Auto, Safel-ite Glass and one Empty Suite Lim's Honda, Acura and Mazda and one Empty Suite 24 Hour Fitness Legends Nails, Nutrition 4 Less, My Makeup Kit, Sunshine Foot Massage and one Empty Suite Bella Rose Body Sculpting, GQ Dress Designs and two Empty Suites Vista Paint, Roger Dunn Golf Shop, and Proverbs 31, 909 Pub and Grill Engrave'N Embrodier, Vapor Lounge, and two Empty Suites Premier Healthcare, Farmers Insurance and three Empty Suites Five Empty Suites I oddler I own 3 Suites for l he Carey Agency,State Farm, CCU Appraisal Agency, Rancho Parking Lot Six Empty Suites Pacific Century Investments, and Four Empty Suites Mountain View Oral Surgery, True Beauty Aesthetic and one Empty Suite Three Empty Suites, and two Suites for CW Driver Construction Matrix Institute of Addiction Suites 102 A & B and one Empty Suite Smog Stop, 1 Empty Suite, RalliCandi and Discount Auto Eurotech Imports, Allstar Auto Center and Tint Shop Empty Suite 24 Hour Fitness Assessment District No. 93-1, Masi Plaza 2 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #02 P192 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 93-1 PROPOSED SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS Sources Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies Interest Revenue Total Proposed Sources Uses Debt Service Principal Repayments Interest Expense Subtotal - Debt Service Contract Services Assessment Administration Admin./General Overhead Total Proposed Uses Resolution No. 17-059 Fiscal Year 2017/18 Budqet $ 242,120 4,590 $ 246,710 $ 165,000 67,970 232,970 2,500 140 260 $ 235,870 Contribution to/(Use ofl Fund Balance $ 10,840 Assessment District No. 93-1, Masi Plaza 3 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #02 F M M V o Ai \1 4 � 1 W y i ' W � y i y i Q i Ay epuenA!13 I i ig "I Ay JO)SO4008 Ay UGN!II!W r._.._.._.._.s.v i i i i Ay uaneH — i Ay esOWJGH Ay Pleq!yojV- 1 1 I Ay uewi!aH _ - i i is ue11auJe3 P193 Resolution No. 17-059 a� E A rn U Q . LO 0 Ay AJJago d �e o y N C M o cc L m O LL Q � c CO ccN ;oc N m Assessment District No. 93-1, Masi Plaza Fiscal Year 2017/18 Ay;se3 in L Ay epuenA!13 Ay JOISB40oa i a Ay ua)!!II!w I Ay uaneH i Ay BSOWJGH i 1 AV Pleq!4ojV Ay ueWIIOH s u i xPgpp br Ad BAOJE)a�Y°ti'ps Fn Q: U) L 00 b-a`$Ys O Q Ivill r c�esgp�a5e� <L °an# ®tge�y"y e �nei�Y9Ffl$�'h �YE�1 rtnYsE 6 P l.s8� rYEaYiFFs��e 4 ATTACHMENT #02 P194 STAFF REPORT DATE: July 19, 2017 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services ib Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director Noah Daniels, Finance Manager 0.' SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL BENEFIT ASSESSMENTS FOR DRAINAGE AREA NO. 91-2 (DAY CANYON DRAINAGE BASIN) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017/18. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution approving the annual benefit assessment levy for the maintenance and servicing of a drainage channel within Drainage Area No. 91-2 (Day Canyon Drainage Basin) (the "District") for Fiscal Year 2017/18. BACKGROUND: On November 6, 1991, City Council adopted Resolution No. 91-331 for the annual levy of benefit assessments for the maintenance and servicing of a 27 -acre-foot desilting basin and a 1,460 -linear foot concrete drainage channel within the District boundaries. The District was developer -initiated for the protection of the developed properties from the overland flows to receive development rights. The City maintains the desilting basin and drainage channel. The costs associated with the maintenance are passed on to the property owners, as they receive special and direct benefit that is distinguishable from the other property owners that are outside the boundary. Annually, prior to the County's direct assessment enrollment deadline in August, the City Council will be requested to adopt a resolution approving the levy of benefit assessments as reflected in the respective Annual Supplement to the Final Engineer's Report for the District pursuant to the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982. Accordingly, for the upcoming Fiscal Year 2017/18 levy, the City Council's approval is recommended prior to the August 10, 2017 submittal deadline to the County of San Bernardino, for the assessments to be included in the upcoming tax roll. Although the City Council has previously authorized the formation of the District and the maximum assessment levy within the boundaries of the District, the actual annual assessment to be levied must be authorized on an annual basis. Page 1 of 2 P195 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CONSIDERATION TO ESTABLISH ANNUAL LEVY FOR THE BENEFIT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 91-2 JULY 19, 2017 ANALYSIS: The annual assessment for the District is sufficient to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the desilting basin and drainage channel. All the costs related to the District are costs of the District, not the City nor its General Fund. Thus, all costs related to administering the District are the responsibility of the property owners within the District. The annual assessment will be applied to all parcels within the District. The total annual cost for maintenance to each parcel is $92.17. The table below summarizes the levy for the District for Fiscal Year 2017/18: Benefit Assessment District Proposed Assessment Le Notes 91-2 (Day Canyon Drainage Basin) $32,352 No change from prior year. The assessments noted in the Annual Supplement to the Final Engineer's Report for the District are net of estimated delinquencies for budgetary purposes. In cases of delinquency and foreclosure, the parcels will be subject to penalties. If approved, City staff will file the certified list of all parcels subject to the benefit assessment levy with the County of San Bernardino no later than the County's August 10, 2017 submittal deadline. Adoption of the resolution will provide for the Fiscal Year 2017/18 levy upon the parcels within the District that are not otherwise exempt from taxation for Fiscal Year 2017/18. FISCAL IMPACT: The District is separate from the City General Fund. The benefit assessment revenues that are collected for the District are used for the related services for only the District. COUNCIL GOAL ADDRESSED: There is no City Council Goal addressed. The process of approving the assessment levy for the District is required by the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 01 — Resolution No. 17-060 Attachment 02 — Annual Supplement to the Final Engineer's Report Page 2 of 2 P196 collected and all laws providing for the collection and enforcement of such County taxes shall be applicable to the collection and enforcement of these benefit assessments. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 19th day of July, 2017. Resolution No. 17-060 — Page 2 of 2 ATTACHMENT #01 P197 RESOLUTION NO. 17-060 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING THE COST OF SERVICE TO BE FINANCED BY BENEFIT ASSESSMENTS TO BE LEVIED IN DRAINAGE AREA NO. 91-2 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017/18 AND DETERMINING AND IMPOSING SUCH BENEFIT ASSESSMENTS WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, previously undertook proceedings to authorize the levy and imposition of benefit assessments to pay for the annual drainage maintenance, including the removal of sediment and debris from the Day Canyon Channel improvements and basin, pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Benefit Assessment Act of 1982", being Chapter 6.4, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California (commencing with Section 54703), said area of benefit being known and designated as Drainage Area No. 91-2 (the "Drainage Area"); and WHEREAS, at this time there has been presented to this City Council an annual Supplemental Report (the "Supplemental Report") to the Final Engineer's Report for the Drainage Area setting forth a description of the proposed service, cost estimate and assessment schedule for Fiscal Year 2017/18; and WHEREAS, at this time this City Council desires to determine the cost of providing authorized services to be financed by the levy of a benefit assessment for Fiscal Year 2017/18 and to determine and impose such benefit assessment. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That the Supplemental Report is hereby approved and ordered to be kept on file in the Office of the City Clerk as a permanent record and to remain open for public inspection. Said Supplemental Report generally consists of the following: A. A description of the service proposed to be financed through revenue derived through the levy and collection of the benefit assessment; B. A description of each lot or parcel of property proposed to be subject to the benefit assessment; and C. The amount of the proposed assessment for each parcel. SECTION 3: That the rate and method of apportionment of the benefit assessment as set forth in the Final Engineer's Report is hereby adopted and has been utilized as the rate and method of apportionment of the benefit assessment to be levied in Fiscal Year 2017/18. SECTION 4: That this City Council hereby determines and orders that the benefit assessments described in the Supplemental Report within the Drainage Area are hereby confirmed and levied for Fiscal Year 2017/18. SECTION 5: That the above confirmed and levied benefit assessment for Fiscal Year 2017/18 shall be collected at the same time and in the same manner as general County property taxes are Resolution No. 17-060 — Page 1 of 2 ATTACHMENT #01 ANNUAL SUPPLEMENT TO THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT DRAINAGE AREA NO. 91-2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Lynne B. Kennedy, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Sam Spagnolo, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director JULY 2017 P198 Jk #C,W rnjvi4 #02 P199 ANNUAL SUPPLEMENT TO FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT DRAINAGE AREA NO. 91-2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TABLE OF CONTENTS Engineer's Report Exhibit A - Description of Service Exhibit B - Cost Estimate Exhibit C - Assessment Schedule Map Resolution No. 17-060 Benefit Assessment District No. 91-2 1 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #02 P200 Resolution No. 17-060 AGENCY: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PROJECT: DRAINAGE AREA NO. 91-2 TO: CITY COUNCIL CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA ANNUAL SUPPLEMENT TO FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT PURSUANT TO BENEFIT ASSESSMENT ACT OF 1982 This Annual Supplement to the Final Engineer's Report (the "Annual Supplement") for City of Rancho Cucamonga Drainage Area No. 91-2 is hereby submitted consisting of the following documents, pursuant to the provisions of the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982, being Chapter 6.4, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California, commencing with Section 54703. This Annual Supplement is applicable for the ensuing 12 -month period, being the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2017 to June 30, 2018. 1. DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE (Exhibit "A"): A description of the service proposed to be financed through revenue derived from the levy and collection of the annual benefit assessment. 2. COST ESTIMATE (Exhibit "B"): A listing of all costs and expenses for the next fiscal year, including incidental expenses. 3. BENEFIT ASSESSMENT SCHEDULE (Exhibit "C"): The annual assessment schedule, setting forth the following: A. Annual Benefit Assessment: The amount of the proposed benefit assessment for each parcel. B. Description of Parcel: A description of each lot or parcel of property proposed to be subject to the benefit assessment, said parcel being described by the County Assessor's parcel number. No benefit assessments shall be imposed or levied upon land owned by a Federal or State governmental agency and/or any other local agency. Any utility property and right-of-way shall be subject to assessment only to the extent that it is specifically benefited from the proposed services. Reference is made to the Final Engineer's Report as incorporated in Resolution No. 91-331 for a description of the boundaries of the Drainage Area and each parcel therein and for the method of spreading the benefit assessment. Benefit Assessment District No. 91-2 2 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #02 P201 Resolution No. 17-060 Executed this 19th day of July, 2017, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING SERVICES/CITY ENGINEER CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA By: Final approval, confirmation, and levy of the annual benefit assessment and all matters in the Annual Supplement were made on the 19th day of July, 2017, by adoption of Resolution No. 17-060 by the City Council. CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA A copy of said Assessment Roll and Annual Supplement was filed in the Office of the City Engineer and the City Clerk on the 19th day of July, 2017. CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING SERVICES/CITY ENGINEER CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA Benefit Assessment District No. 91-2 3 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #02 P202 Resolution No. 17-060 EXHIBIT A DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE The properties within Drainage Area No. 91-2 ("Drainage Area") are located within the boundaries of the Day Canyon Drainage Basin area. Protection of the properties within the Drainage Area from overland flows requires the construction of a 27+ acre-foot desilting basin and a 1,460+ linear foot concrete drainage channel. The channel improvements will intercept the overland flows prior to reaching the properties and carry the storm water runoff, sediment, trash, organic material, and related debris to a desilting basin. Each year the sediment, trash, organic material, and other related debris that accumulates in the desilting basin and channel must be removed and transported to an approved spoils site. The services proposed to be financed from the revenue derived from the levy and collections of the annual benefit assessment are as follows: A. Monthly on-site inspections of the desilting basin and channel. B. Bi -monthly weed abatement program for the desilting basin and channel. C. Removal of accumulated sediment, trash, organic material, and other related debris from the desilting basin and channel to an approved spoils site. This service is expected to be provided annually. During times of excessive rainfall, this service may be required more frequently. Benefit Assessment District No. 91-2 4 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #02 P203 Resolution No. 17-060 EXHIBIT B COST ESTIMATE FISCAL YEAR 2017/18 A. Cost of Annual Maintenance Regular Salaries $13,860 Fringe Benefits $6,360 Subtotal $20,220 B. Incidental Expenses City Administration $1,940 Administration/General Overhead $6,110 Subtotal $8,050 C. Total Annual Costs $28,270 D. Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $4,820 E. Balance to Assessment Property Taxes, net of estimated delinquencies $31,870 Interest Earnings $570 Delinquencies 650 $33,090 Benefit Assessment District No. 91-2 5 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #02 P204 Resolution No. 17-060 EXHIBIT C ASSESSMENT SCHEDULE WHEREAS, this City Council has previously, pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Benefit Assessment Act of 1982", being Chapter 6.4, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California, commencing with Section 54703, formed Drainage Area No. 91-2 all in accordance with the provisions of said Act; and, WHEREAS, the Annual Supplement for Fiscal Year 2017/18 consisting of certain documentation (including the amount of the proposed assessment for each parcel, a description of the parcel and a description of the service proposed to be provided) has now been prepared. NOW, THEREFORE, the Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer by virtue of the power vested pursuant to said Act and by order of the legislative body, hereby makes and recommends the following benefit assessment to cover the costs and expenses of the service proposed to be financed through the levy of assessments and revenue derived for the Fiscal Year 2017/18. Said costs and expenses are generally as follows: Personnel Salaries $20,220 Cost of Improvements $0 Incidental Expenses $8,050 Total Costs $28,270 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $4,820 Balance to Assesment $33,090 I do hereby assess and apportion the total amount of the costs and expenses upon the several parcels of land within the area of benefit in proportion to the estimated benefits received, and hereby further state as follows: A. The amount of benefit assessment imposed is specifically related to the benefit of the parcel, which will be derived from the provision of the service to be provided. B. The annual aggregate amount of the total benefit assessment does not exceed the estimated annual cost of providing the service. C. The revenue derived from the benefit assessment shall not be used to pay for the cost of any service other than the service for which the benefit assessment was levied. The assessment parcels herein refer to the County Assessment Roll for a description of the lots or parcels, and said assessment roll shall govern for all details concerning the description of the lots or parcels. Benefit Assessment District No. 91-2 6 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #02 Resolution No. 17-060 The net amount to be assessed upon the lands has been spread and apportioned by formula as set forth in the Final Engineer's Report in accordance with the benefits received from each parcel, and in my opinion, said costs and expenses have been apportioned in direct relationship to the benefits received from the maintenance works of improvement. In the opinion of the undersigned, the benefit assessments have been spread and apportioned in accordance with the benefits to be received from the proposed work and services. Dated: July 19, 2017 DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING SERVICES/CITY ENGINEER CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA ASSESSMENT PARCEL NUMBER 1087-261-01 to 11 1087-271-01 to 42 1087-281-01 to 58 1087-291-01 to 20 1087-301-01 to 35 1087-311-01 to 38 1087-321-01 to 34 1087-331-01 to 61 1087-341-01 to 58 Total Benefit Assessment District No. 91-2 Fiscal Year 2017/18 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 351 Residential Parcels AMOUNT OF ASSESSMENT $32,352.00 $32,352.00 7 ATTACHMENT #02 P205 P206 Resolution No. 17-060 N N r E N V ny kJ"O y o —jLO o C N y m 8 0 ny ISe3 rn y 1 � ny ny epuene 13 � ----- �g �aa1� deQ ------ AV JO"LPOa _ _...__... ny JGIsayoo- r 1 ny uaNIIIIW �.��� �` AV UON1111w I ny uaneH I ny u eneH ny esoullaH n ' d esouua H ny pleq!tpV I — ny pleq!tP1b " ny uewllaH I '� ny uewllaH P In ny pletauln IS ue!lauweO { Of : r ary 0—� ... � ��..�t� ny ano1E) 9 Cn = a e� fill, U Benefit Assessment District No. 91-2 8 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #02 P207 STAFF REPORT DATE: July 19, 2017 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director ft Noah Daniels, Finance Manager Np SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NOS. 2000-01, 2000-02, 2000-03, 2000-03 SPECIAL TAX "B", 2001-01 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NOS. 1 AND 2), 2001-01 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 3), 2003-01 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 1), 2003-01 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 2), 2004-01, 2006-01, AND 2006-02 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017/18. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt resolutions approving the levy of special taxes for Community Facilities District Nos. 2000-01 (South Etiwanda), 2000-02 (Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park), 2000-03 (Rancho Summit), 2000-03 Special Tax "B" (Rancho Summit), 2001- 01 (Improvement Area Nos. 1 and 2), 2001-01 (Improvement Area No. 3), 2003-01 (Improvement Area No. 1), 2003-01 (Improvement Area No. 2), 2004-01 (Rancho Etiwanda Estates), 2006-01 (Vintner's Grove), and 2006-02 (Amador on Route 66) for Fiscal Year 2017/18. BACKGROUND: Pursuant to the Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (the "1982 Act"), the City Council approved the issuance of bonds to financing public facilities within certain geographical boundaries which formed the aforementioned Community Facilities Districts (each a "District" and collectively, the "Districts"). Annually, prior to the County's direct assessment enrollment deadline in August, the City Council will be asked to adopt a resolution approving the levy of special tax as reflected in the respective Annual Status Report for each district. Accordingly, for the upcoming Fiscal Year 2017/18 levy, the City Council's approval is recommended prior to the August 10, 2017 submittal deadline to the County of San Bernardino, for the special taxes to be included in the upcoming tax roll. Although the City Council has previously authorized the formation of the Districts, the bonded indebtedness, and the maximum levy of a special tax within the boundaries of the Districts, the actual annual special tax to be levied must be authorized on an annual basis. Page 1 of 3 P208 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CONSIDERATION TO SET SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICTS JULY 19, 2017 ANALYSIS: The annual levy of special taxes for the Districts is sufficient to pay for the public facilities and services, the principal, interest, and other periodic costs for the bonded indebtedness associated with the Districts. These costs are permitted to be financed pursuant to the 1982 Act. All the costs related to the Districts are costs of the Districts, not the City nor its General Fund. Thus, all costs related to administering the Districts and paying debt service on the bonds are the responsibility of the property owners within the Districts. Additionally, the outstanding indebtedness of the Districts is not an obligation of the City. The annual levy of special taxes will be applied to all parcels within the Districts which are not otherwise exempt from taxation or that have not provided a complete payoff covering all future fiscal years' levies. The special taxes will be levied until the bonds issued by the Districts mature, except for the maintenance special tax for CFD 2000-03 Special Tax "B" (Rancho Summit). The maintenance special tax will be levied and collected in perpetuity, unless and until such time the City determines that revenues are no longer needed. The annual maintenance special tax will be adjusted annually by the CPI, with a maximum annual increase of 6% and a minimum annual increase of 2% each fiscal year. The table below summarizes the levy for each District for Fiscal Year 2017/18: Community Facilities Proposed Special Tax Levy Notes District $ 73,922 2000-01 (South Etiwanda) No change from prior year. 2000-02 (Rancho Cucamonga $ 517,768 No change from prior year. Corporate Park $ 566,112 2000-03 Increase from prior year for (Rancho Summit) debt service. 2000-03 Special Tax "B" $ 455,368 Increase for CPI factor. (Rancho Summit) 2001-01 (Improvement Area No. 1 and $ 670,447 No change from prior year. 2 2001-01 (Improvement Area No. 3) $ 61,467 No change from prior year. Increase from prior year for 2003-01 $ 1,078,123 (Improvement Area No. 1) debt service. 2003-01 $ 201,043 Increase from prior year for (Improvement Area No. 2) $ 2,505,143 debt service. 2004-01 (Rancho Etiwanda Estates) No change from prior year. 2006-01 (Vintner's Grove) $ 288,959 $ 183,158 No change from prior year. 2006-02 (Amador on Route 66) No change from prior year. Page 2 of 3 P209 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CONSIDERATION TO SET SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICTS JULY 19, 2017 The special taxes noted in the Annual Status Report for each district are net of estimated delinquencies for budgetary purposes. In cases of special tax delinquency and foreclosure, the parcels will be subject to penalties. If approved, City staff will file the certified list of all parcels subject to the special tax levy with the County of San Bernardino no later than the County's August 10, 2017 submittal deadline. Adoption of the resolutions will provide for the Fiscal Year 2017/18 levy upon the parcels within each District that are not otherwise exempt from taxation, at the rates set forth in the attached Annual Status Reports for Fiscal Year 2017/18. FISCAL IMPACT: The Districts are separate from the City General Fund. The special tax revenues that are collected for each district are used for the related services, debt service payments, and administration costs for only that District. COUNCIL GOAL ADDRESSED: There is no City Council Goal addressed. The process of approving the special tax for the Districts is required by the 1982 Act. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 01 — Resolution No. 17-061 Attachment 02 — Annual Status Report — CFD 2000-01 Attachment 03 — Resolution No. 17-062 Attachment 04 — Annual Status Report - CFD 2000-02 Attachment 05 — Resolution No. 17-063 Attachment 06 — Annual Status Report - CFD 2000-03 Attachment 07 — Resolution No. 17-064 Attachment 08 — Annual Status Report - CFD 2000-03 Special Tax "B" Attachment 09 — Resolution No. 17-065 Attachment 10 — Annual Status Report — CFD 2001-01 (Improvement Area No. 1 and 2) Attachment 11 — Resolution No. 17-066 Attachment 12 — Annual Status Report — CFD 2001-01 (Improvement Area No. 3) Attachment 13 — Resolution No. 17-067 Attachment 14 — Annual Status Report — CFD 2003-01 (Improvement Area No. 1) Attachment 15 — Resolution No. 17-068 Attachment 16 — Annual Status Report — CFD 2003-01 (Improvement Area No. 2) Attachment 17 — Resolution No. 17-069 Attachment 18 — Annual Status Report - CFD 2004-01 Attachment 19 — Resolution No. 17-070 Attachment 20 — Annual Status Report - CFD 2006-01 Attachment 21 — Resolution No. 17-071 Attachment 22 — Annual Status Report — CFD 2006-02 Page 3 of 3 P210 RESOLUTION NO. 17-061 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2000-01 (SOUTH ETIWANDA) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017/18 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, (hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body of the local Agency"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code for the State of California. This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as Community Facilities District No. 2000-01 (South Etiwanda) (hereinafter referred to as the "District"); and WHEREAS, at this time, bonds were previously issued for purposes of financing the project facilities for said District (the "Prior Special Tax Bonds"); and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said District, and this legislative body, by the adoption of Resolution No. 15-147 on August 5, 2015, previously established the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the fiscal year based, in part, upon the debt service payable on the Prior Special Tax Bonds; and WHEREAS, on July 30, 2015, special tax refunding bonds were issued by the District to refund the Prior Special Tax Bonds resulting in a reduction in the debt service payable from the special taxes levied within the District. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the special tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for Fiscal Year 2017/18 for the District are hereby determined and established as set forth in the attached, referenced and incorporated in the Annual Status Report. SECTION 3: That the rates as set forth in such Annual Status Report do not exceed the amount as previously authorized by Ordinance of this legislative body, and are not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the special tax are used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: A. Payment of principal of and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness; B. Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds; C. Payment of costs and expenses of administering the District and any bonds of the District; and D. Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate. Resolution No. 17-061 — Page 1 of 2 ATTACHMENT #01 P211 The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. SECTION 5: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax. SECTION 6: All monies above collected shall be paid into the District funds, including but not limited to, any special tax fund, bond fund, and reserve fund. SECTION 7: The County Auditor is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land effected in a space marked "public improvements, special tax", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special tax, and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Annual Status Report. SECTION 8: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties, and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 19th day of July, 2017. Resolution No. 17-061 — Page 2 of 2 ATTACHMENT #01 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-01 SOUTH ETIWANDA ANNUAL STATUS REPORT JULY. 2017 P212 A-ffachwo-� On, P213 Resolution No.17-061 BACKGROUND On November 7, 2000, an election was held and the property owners within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 2000-01 (South Etiwanda) (the "District") authorized the District to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $1,365,000. On November 15, 2000, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 645 authorizing the levy of a Special Tax in the District. Bonds were issued on December 21, 2000, for the purpose of financing the acquisition of certain public facilities that included street, sewer, water, storm drain, landscaping and park improvements that were required for and would permit the development of the properties within the District. The District is located east of Interstate 15, and is bordered by Foothill to the south, East to the east, Base Line to the north, Etiwanda to the west and is intersected by Miller. On December 7, 2011, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 11-179 authorizing the issuance of special tax refunding bonds for this District. The Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Series 2012, in the principal amount of $658,000 were issued on December 21, 2011. This amount represented the outstanding principal balance of the original bonds as of this date. On July 1, 2015, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 15-115 authorizing the issuance of special tax refunding bonds for this District in conjunction with various other community facilities districts. The Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Series 2015, were refunded with a total principal amount of $18,546,000 and were issued on July 30, 2015. By authorizing this refunding, the City Council provided savings to the property owners for the remaining life of the bond issue, that translated to a 4.85% overall reduction in the annual debt service payment paid by property owners. The annual special tax is based on the square footage of the home for residential properties. This special tax shall be levied only so long as required for each parcel of taxable property to discharge bond obligations. Community Facilities District No. 2000-01 1 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #02 P214 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-01 ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FISCAL YEAR 2017/18 DESCRIPTION 1. Residential Property 2. Residential Property Residential Property BUILDING SIZE > 2,301 Sq Ft 1,801 — 2,300 Sq Ft <1,800 Sq Ft Resolution No. 17-061 ASSIGNED SPECIAL TAX $283.66 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-01 PROPOSED SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS $269.48 $241.11 Community Facilities District No. 2000-01 2 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #02 Fiscal Year 2017/18 Budget Sources Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies $ 73,190 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 1,350 Subtotal - Taxes 74,540 Interest Revenue 510 Total Proposed Sources $ 75,050 Uses Debt Service Principal Repayments $ 42,000 Interest Expense 12,050 Subtotal - Debt Service 54,050 Contract Services 1,000 Assessment Administration 16,490 Admin./General Overhead 320 Total Proposed Uses $ 71,860 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ 3,190 Community Facilities District No. 2000-01 2 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #02 Ay uaneH Ay esouJJaH Ay P1eg14PJV Ay U2W118H 1S ue!!aujaO Ay epuenng3 8WeJoROG Ay JOJSOLIJOa Ay /, 40 c P215 Resolution No.17-061 U r � C13 AV M3 in r —� Ay epuemija Ay J 8JSOLPOb Ay uaX!11!W nAV usneH I�uljAV esOWJOH Ay Pleq!LPJV �. Ay ueuJll$H j Ay Petau!n S� fj w AVGAOJ!D75. LL��� Community Facilities District No. 2000-01 3 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #02 y CI r N 9 r N r U U � u-� � tM o J o LO ry o m � U r � C13 AV M3 in r —� Ay epuemija Ay J 8JSOLPOb Ay uaX!11!W nAV usneH I�uljAV esOWJOH Ay Pleq!LPJV �. Ay ueuJll$H j Ay Petau!n S� fj w AVGAOJ!D75. LL��� Community Facilities District No. 2000-01 3 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #02 ;kA [:1 RESOLUTION NO. 17-062 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2000-02 (RANCHO CUCAMONGA CORPORATE PARK) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017/18 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, (hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body of the local Agency"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code for the State of California. This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as Community Facilities District No. 2000-02 (Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park) (hereinafter referred to as the "District'); and WHEREAS, at this time, bonds were previously issued for purposes of financing the project facilities for said District (the "Prior Special Tax Bonds"); and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said District, and this legislative body, by the adoption of Resolution No. 15-148 on August 5, 2015, previously established the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the fiscal year based, in part, upon the debt service payable on the Prior Special Tax Bonds; and WHEREAS, on July 30, 2015, special tax refunding bonds were issued by the District to refund the Prior Special Tax Bonds resulting in a reduction in the debt service payable from the special taxes levied within the District. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the special tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for Fiscal Year 2017/18 for the District are hereby determined and established as set forth in the attached, referenced and incorporated in the Annual Status Report. SECTION 3: That the rates as set forth in such Annual Status Report do not exceed the amount as previously authorized by Ordinance of this legislative body, and are not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the special tax are used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: A. Payment of principal of and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness; B. Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds; C. Payment of costs and expenses of administering the District and any bonds of the District; and D. Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate. Resolution No. 17-062 — Page 1 of 2 ATTACHMENT #03 P217 The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. SECTION 5: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax. SECTION 6: All monies above collected shall be paid into the District funds, including but not limited to, any special tax fund, bond fund, and reserve fund. SECTION 7: The County Auditor is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land effected in a space marked "public improvements, special tax", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special tax, and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Annual Status Report. SECTION 8: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties, and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 19th day of July, 2017. Resolution No. 17-062 — Page 2 of 2 ATTACHMENT #03 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-02 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CORPORATE PARK ANNUAL STATUS REPORT JULY, 2017 P218 1��ie�111HOLT1 �� I ;kA 10:1 Resolution No. 17-062 BACKGROUND On November 7, 2000, the electors within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 2000-02 (Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park) (the "District") authorized the District to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $6,835,000 for the purpose of financing the acquisition of street improvements on public street improvements required as a condition of approval of development of the property within the proposed district including Milliken, Arrow and Foothill; such street improvements to include, but not to be limited to: demolition and grading, curb, gutter and sidewalks, traffic signals; entry feature and signs; fire hydrants; storm drains; water and sewer improvements; paving; striping; landscaping and irrigation improvements; public utilities and appurtenances. On December 7, 2011, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 11-179 authorizing the issuance of special tax refunding bonds for this District. The Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Series 2011, in the principal amount of $5,407,000 were issued on December 21, 2011. This amount represented the outstanding principal balance of the original bonds as of this date. On July 1, 2015, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 15-115 authorizing the issuance of special tax refunding bonds for this District in conjunction with various other Community Facilities Districts. The Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Series 2015 were refunded with a total principal amount of $18,546,000 and were issued on July 30, 2015. By authorizing this refunding, the City Council provided savings to the property owners for the remaining life of the bond issue, that translated to a 4.72% overall reduction in the annual debt service payment paid by property owners. Each July 1, commencing July 1, 2012 the maximum annual special tax will be increased by two percent (2%) of the amount in effect for the previous fiscal year. The special taxes will be levied as follows: (1) The special tax will be levied on each taxable parcel in an amount equal to 100% of the applicable maximum annual special tax; or (2) If the special tax requirement will be satisfied by an amount less than the maximum annual special tax the special tax will be levied proportionately on each taxable parcel at less than 100% of the maximum annual special tax. Therefore, for Fiscal Year 2017/18 the current rate is sufficient to meet fiscal obligations and there is no need for an increase of the special tax by 2%. This special tax shall be levied only so long as required for each parcel of taxable property to discharge bond obligations. Community Facilities District No. 2000-02 1 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #04 P220 Resolution No. 17-062 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-02 ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FISCAL YEAR 2017/18 There will be no increase to the special tax for the District. The annual tax rate for Fiscal Year 2017/18 will be $3,792.06 per acre, and will provide sufficient funding for the estimated uses and contribution to fund balance in the amount of $534,260. COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-02 PROPOSED SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS Community Facilities District No. 2000-02 2 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #04 Fiscal Year 2017/18 Budget Sources Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies $ 512,600 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 19,000 Subtotal - Taxes 531,600 Interest Revenue 2,660 Total Proposed Sources $ 534,260 Uses Debt Service Principal Repayments $ 351,000 Interest Expense 112,290 Subtotal - Debt Service 463,290 Contract Services 1,000 Assessment Administration 47,500 Admin./General Overhead 730 Total Proposed Uses $ 512,520 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ 21,740 Community Facilities District No. 2000-02 2 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #04 P221 Resolution No. 17-062 N d O V +y. O Q � D N � N > U- � o Ay fSJJeyO N fw J Mn *! O � `O . V Ay W83 in � 1 v Ulm Ay epue^n431 Ay epUCMI13 mewo "'Ba Ay Ja}SaL 00o 1 ^ ....... . nd J s3saLPo2! Ay uaNlll!W Ay uaMPUY i o Ay ue^8H s _... I , - RAV UaAeH 1 4 II Ay esowJaH - u ^y esouuaH I ! Ay pleq!4pJd �- Ay pleq!4pd Ay UEUIIIeH f . — �..... __ — _--- - .�,.�-• Ab uewll$H I Ad paeceu!A f IS ue!lawea a g } AVGAOJ!D C? !.c Co Community Facilities District No. 2000-02 3 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #04 P222 RESOLUTION NO. 17-063 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING FOR THE LEVY OF SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-03 (RANCHO SUMMIT) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017/18 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, (hereinafter referred to as the 'legislative body of the local Agency"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code for the State of California. This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as Community Facilities District No. 2000-03 (Rancho Summit) (hereinafter referred to as the "District'); and WHEREAS, at this time, bonds have been authorized for purposes of financing the project facilities for said District; and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said District, and this legislative body is desirous to establish the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the fiscal year. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the special tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for Fiscal Year 2017/18 for the referenced District are hereby determined and established as set forth in the attached, referenced and incorporated in the Annual Status Report. SECTION 3: That the rate asset forth above does not exceed the amount as previously authorized by Ordinance of this legislative body, and is not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the special tax are used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: A. Payment of principal of and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness; B. Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds; C. Payment of costs and expenses of authorized public facilities and public services; and D. Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate. The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. SECTION 5: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax. Resolution No. 17-063 — Page 1 of 2 ATTACHMENT #05 P223 SECTION 6: All monies above collected shall be paid into the District funds, including but not limited to, any special tax fund, bond fund, and reserve fund. SECTION 7: The County Auditor is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land effected in a space marked "public improvements, special tax", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special tax, and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Annual Status Report. SECTION & The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties, and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 191h day of July, 2017. Resolution No. 17-063 — Page 2 of 2 ATTACHMENT #05 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-03 A (RANCHO SUMMIT) ANNUAL STATUS REPORT JULY, 2017 P224 Afthnucrf -Ac'& P225 Resolution No.17-063 BACKGROUND On October 11, 2000 an election was held and the property owners within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 2000-03 (Rancho Summit) (the "District") authorized the District to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $9,835,000. On July 6, 2005, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 744 approving the levy of the special tax, and on September 21, 2005 approved Resolution No. 05-278 authorizing the issuance of bonds. The District was authorized to finance park improvements including clearing and grading of park sites, park hardscape and restrooms, street improvements and parkway hardscape landscaping of parks and parkways and park equipment with a useful life of five (5) years or more. The District is bounded by the San Bernardino National Forest to the north, the 210 Freeway to the south, Interstate 15 Freeway to the east, and East to the west. On July 16, 2014, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 14-127 authorizing the issuance of special tax refunding bonds for this District. The Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Series 2014 in the principal amount of $8,500,000 were issued on July 31, 2014. By authorizing this refunding, the City Council provided annual savings to the property owners of approximately $120,000 for the remaining life of the bond issue. Each Fiscal Year, all Taxable Property within the District shall be assigned to a Zone and further classified as Developed Property, Taxable Public Property, Taxable Property Owner Association Property, or Undeveloped Property, and shall be subject to Special Taxes in accordance with this Amended and Restated Rate and Method of Apportionment. Residential Property shall be assigned to Land Use Classes 1 through 10 and Non -Residential Property shall be assigned to Land Use Class 11. Community Facilities District No. 2000-03 (Rancho Summit) 1 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #06 yW:1 Land Use Class 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Resolution No. 17-063 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-03 ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FISCAL YEAR 2017/18 Description Residential Floor Area Assigned Special Tax Residential Property Residential Property Residential Property Residential Property Residential Property Residential Property Residential Property Residential Property Residential Property Residential Property Non -Residential Property < 1,850 Sq. Ft 1,850 — 2,049 Sq. Ft 2,050 — 2,249 Sq. Ft 2,250 — 2,449 Sq. Ft 2,450 — 2,649 Sq. Ft 2,650 — 2,849 Sq. Ft 2,850 — 3,049 Sq. Ft 3,050 — 3,049 Sq. Ft 3,250 — 3,249 Sq. Ft => 3,450 Sq. Ft N/A $1,286.21 $1,430.88 $1,527.32 $1,541.65 $1,552.94 $1,684.05 $1,855.09 $1,904.07 $2,017.09 $2,031.41 $9,493.97 per Acre Community Facilities District No. 2000-03 (Rancho Summit) 2 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #06 P227 Resolution No.17-063 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-03 PROPOSED USES AND SOURCES OF FUNDS Fiscal Year 2017/18 Budget Sources Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies $ 560,460 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 8,250 Subtotal - Taxes 568,710 Interest Revenue 1,870 Total Proposed Sources $ 570,580 Uses Debt Service Principal Repayments Interest Expense Subtotal - Debt Service Contract Services Assessment Administration Admin./General Overhead Total Proposed Uses $ 256,000 260,680 516,680 2,000 34,530 570 $ 553,780 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ 16,800 Community Facilities District No. 2000-03 (Rancho Summit) 3 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #06 Ay ueAeH Ay esOULaH Ad plegl4wd Ay uewllaH is uellauweo I I - Ay epuenn43 _ i B Newo 4ep Ay Jais0400�d 0 I P228 Resolution No. 17-063 1 r l Ad J aiMPON N N Ay ua�lI11W } f 4QpC7 M _.._..._. rq Ay esouuaH U- C U AV Ay "OLIO m c C Uew11aH � N c i� o g �AeJSeA Ay epu eM43 1 r l Ad J aiMPON Ay ua�lI11W } f - - M I � � _ _ g Ab' WeAewA Community Facilities District No. 2000-03 (Rancho Summit) Fiscal Year 2017/18 4 ATTACHMENT #06 l Ad J aiMPON Ay ua�lI11W } f - - Ab u aneH _.._..._. -- Ay esouuaH Ay plegl4OJd yAd Uew11aH � f � I � � _ _ g Ab' WeAewA Community Facilities District No. 2000-03 (Rancho Summit) Fiscal Year 2017/18 4 ATTACHMENT #06 I y*4:. RESOLUTION NO. 17-064 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING FOR THE LEVY OF MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX "B" FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-03 (RANCHO SUMMIT) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017/18 TO FINANCE THE OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF PARKS AND PARKWAYS WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, (hereinafter referred to as the 'legislative body of the local Agency"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code for the State of California. This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as Community Facilities District No. 2000-03 (Rancho Summit) (hereinafter referred to as the "District'); and WHEREAS, at this time, bonds have been authorized for purposes of financing the project facilities for said District; and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said District, and this legislative body is desirous to establish the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the fiscal year. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the Special Tax "B" to be collected for Fiscal Year 2017/18 for the District are hereby determined and established as set forth Annual Status Report to this Resolution, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. SECTION 1 That the rate asset forth above does not exceed the amount as previously authorized by the Ordinance, and is not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. SECTION 4: That the proceeds of Special Tax "B" shall be used, in whole or in part, for the following: A. Payment of costs and expenses of the operation and maintenance of authorized parks and parkways and incidental expenses pursuant to the Act; B. Payment of an amount necessaryto fund or replenish an operating reserve for the costs of the operation of authorized parks and parkways; and C. Payment of a proportionate share of Administrative Expenses as such tern is defined in the Modified Rate and Method. The proceeds of Special Tax "B" shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. SECTION 5: Special Tax "B" shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable Resolution No. 17-064 — Page 1 of 2 ATTACHMENT #07 P230 administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax. SECTION 6: All monies above collected shall be paid into the District funds, including but not limited to, any special tax fund, bond fund, and reserve fund. SECTION 7: The County Auditor is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land effected in a space marked "public improvements, special tax", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of Special Tax "B," and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Annual Status Report. SECTION & The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties, and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 19'h day of July, 2017. Resolution No. 17-064 — Page 2 of 2 ATTACHMENT #07 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-03 B (RANCHO SUMMIT) ANNUAL STATUS REPORT JULY, 2017 P231 P232 Resolution No. 17-064 BACKGROUND On August 16, 2000, City Council approved Resolution No. 00-149 and established Community Facilities District No. 2000-03, (the "District"). On October 11, 2000, the qualified electors of the District, being the owners of the land within the District, voted to approve the levy of a special tax to pay for certain public services and the administering of such District. On July 6, 2005, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 744 approving the levy of the special tax, and on September 21, 2005 approved Resolution No. 05-278 authorizing the issuance of bonds. The District was authorized to finance park improvements, including, clearing and grading of park sites, park hardscape and restrooms, street improvements and parkway hardscape landscaping of parks, and parkways and park equipment with a useful life of five (5) years or more. The District is bounded by the San Bernardino National Forest to the north, the 210 Freeway to the south, Interstate 15 Freeway to the east, and East to the west. Each fiscal year, all Taxable Property within the District shall be assigned to a Zone and further classified as Developed Property, Taxable Public Property, Taxable Property Owner Association Property, or Undeveloped Property, and shall be subject to Special Taxes in accordance with this Amended and Restated Rate and Method of Apportionment. Residential Property shall be assigned to Land Use Classes 1 through 10 and Non -Residential Property shall be assigned to Land Use Class 11. Annually on July 1, the Maximum Special Tax "B" shall be increased based on the percentage change in the Consumer Price Index, with a maximum annual increase of six percent (6%) and a minimum annual increase of two percent (2%) per Fiscal Year. At this time, in order to provide sufficient revenues to meet the District expenses without adversely impacting maintenance, a rate increase to the Maximum Special Tax "B" is required. This equates to a 2.00% increase from the prior year. Fiscal Year CPI Rate Maximum Assessment per EBU Actual Assessment per EBU 2015/16 2.00% $1,169.92 $1,169.92 2016/17 6.00% $1,240.11 $1,240.11 2017/18 2.00% $1,264.91 $1,264.91 Community Facilities District No. 2000-03 1 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #08 Resolution No. 17-064 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-03 ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FISCAL YEAR 2017/18 Land Use Class Description Residential Floor Area Maximum Special Tax B 1-10 Residential Property <1850 Sq. Ft to => 3,450 Sq. Ft $ 1,264.91 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-03 PROPOSED SOURCESAND USES OF FUNDS Sources Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection Subtotal - Taxes Interest Revenue Total Proposed Sources Uses Personnel Services Operations and Maintenance Contract Services Utilities Assessment Administration Admin./General Overhead Transfers Out to LMD#7 North Etiwanda Total Proposed Uses Contribution to/(Use oo Fund Balance Community Facilities District No. 2000-03 Fiscal Year 2017/18 Fiscal Year 2017/18 Budget $ 445,130 4,850 449,980 4,160 $ 454,140 207,630 26,000 47,570 106,030 1,980 58,870 50,000 $ 498,080 $ (43,940) 2 ATTACHMENT #08 P233 E" ny epuem43 maaJo eQ AV JGWOqOO�j nyuaneH i ny esoWJSH i nd Pleg1Lpjv �. !---- - ny ueW118H i 1 IS U8118uin ; - i P234 Resolution No. 17-064 N N r « O j N U U tr) nb "G43 d o LO N � 8 r� f'."4 M N VI �. m Community Facilities District No. 2000-03 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ny tse3 in Ay epueMI13 AVJalsayPoa ny UaM!IIIW 3 ATTACHMENT #08 nd UaneH ny esOLwOH i AV Pleq!4ojb I - .. -• ny UeWllGH f� Ay PJeAOUTA l ' A g ?� ' �la N nyBnOJ� yap8 3 � y LL val "Lill] Lia@] 3 ATTACHMENT #08 P235 RESOLUTION NO. 17-065 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2001-01 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NOS. 1 AND 2) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017/18 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, (hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body of the local Agency"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code for the State of California. This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as Community Facilities District No. 2001-01 (Improvement Area Nos. 1 and Improvement Area No. 2) (hereinafter referred to as the "District"); and WHEREAS, at this time, bonds were previously issued for purposes of financing the project facilities for said District (the "Prior Special Tax Bonds"); and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said District, and this legislative body, by the adoption of Resolution No. 15-149 on August 5, 2015, previously established the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the fiscal year based, in part, upon the debt service payable on the Prior Special Tax Bonds; and WHEREAS, on July 30, 2015, special tax refunding bonds were issued by the District to refund the Prior Special Tax Bonds resulting in a reduction in the debt service payable from the special taxes levied within the District. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the special tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for Fiscal Year 2017/18 for the District are hereby determined and established as set forth in the attached, referenced and incorporated in the Annual Status Report. SECTION 3: That the rates as set forth in such Annual Status Report do not exceed the amount as previously authorized by Ordinance of this legislative body, and are not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the special tax are used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: A. Payment of principal of and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness; B. Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds; C. Payment of costs and expenses of administering the District and any bonds of the District; and D. Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate. Resolution No. 17-065 — Page 1 of 2 ATTACHMENT #09 P236 The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. SECTION 5: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax. SECTION 6: All monies above collected shall be paid into the District funds, including but not limited to, any special tax fund, bond fund, and reserve fund. SECTION 7: The County Auditor is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land effected in a space marked "public improvements, special tax", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special tax, and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Annual Status Report. SECTION 8: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties, and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 19t' day of July, 2017. Resolution No. 17-065 — Page 2 of 2 ATTACHMENT #09 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2001-01 IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 1 AND 2 ANNUAL STATUS REPORT JULY, 2017 AfcchImQt14 -hL�o P237 P238 Resolution No. 17-065 BACKGROUND On June 20, 2001, an election was held and the property owners within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 2001-01 (Improvement Area Nos. 1 and 2) (the "District") authorized the District to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $14,240,000. On August 15, 2001, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 01-019 authorizing the issuance of bonds. Bonds were issued on August 29, 2001, to share in the financing of public street improvements required for the development of the property within the District; including, improvements to Day Creek, Victoria Park, Church, Foothill, Base Line, and Arbor; landscaping improvements within public right-of-way; and storm drain and flood control improvements. On December 7, 2011, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 11-179 authorizing the issuance of special tax refunding bonds for this District. The Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Series 2012, in the principal amount of $9,093,000 were issued on December 21, 2011. This amount represented the outstanding principal balance of the original bonds as of this date. On July 1, 2015, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 15-115 authorizing the issuance of special tax refunding bonds for this District in conjunction with various other Community Facilities Districts. The Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Series 2015, were refunded with a total principal amount of $18,546,000 and were issued on July 30, 2015. By authorizing this refunding, the City Council provided savings to the property owners for the remaining life of the bond issue, that translated to a 12.09% overall reduction in the annual debt service payment paid by property owners. The special tax shall be levied only so long as required for each parcel of taxable property to discharge bond obligations. Each fiscal year, all Taxable Property within Improvement Area No. 1 and Improvement Area No. 2 shall be classified as Developed Property, Final Mapped Property, Taxable Property Owner Association Property, Taxable Public Property, or Undeveloped Property, and all such Taxable Property shall be subject to the levy of Special Taxes in accordance with the rate and method of apportionment pursuant to the sections below. The property in Improvement Area No. 1 is residential in use. The property in Improvement Area No. 2 is primarily commercial and contains Victoria Gardens. Community Facilities District No. 2001-01 (Improvement Area No. 1 and 2) 1 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #10 P239 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2001-01 ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FISCAL YEAR 2017118 IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 1 LAND USE DESCRIPTION CLASS 1 Single Family Property 2 Single Family Property 3 Single Family Property 4 Single Family Property 5 Single Family Property 6 Single Family Property 7 Single Family Property 8 Apartment Property 9 Non -Residential Property IMPROVEMENT AREA NO.2 Resolution No. 17-065 RESIDENTIAL FLOOR AREA ASSIGNED SPECIAL TAX => 3,250 Sq Ft 2,950 to 3,249 Sq Ft 2,650 to 2,949 Sq Ft 2,350 to 2,649 Sq Ft 2,150 to 2,349 Sq Ft 1,950 to 2,149 Sq Ft < 1,950 Sq Ft Not Applicable Not Applicable LAND USE CLASS DESCRIPTION 1 Apartment Property 2 Other Residential Property 3 Non -Residential Property $1,115.90 per Dwelling Unit $894.84 per Dwelling Unit $805.04 per Dwelling Unit $691.32 per Dwelling Unit $646.69 per Dwelling Unit $594.61 per Dwelling Unit $498.43 per Dwelling Unit $125.94 per Dwelling Unit $4,462.52 per Acre ASSIGNED SPECIAL TAX $125.94 Per Dwelling Unit $5,721.95 per Acre $0.33 Per Sq Ft. of Non -Residential Floor Area Community Facilities District No. 2001-01 (Improvement Area No. 1 and 2) 2 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #10 P240 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2001-01 PROPOSED SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS Sources Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection Subtotal - Taxes Interest Revenue Total Proposed Sources Resolution No. 17-065 Fiscal Year 2017/18 Budget $ 663,750 1,800 665,550 40 $ 665,590 Uses Debt Service Principal Repayments $ 239,630 Interest Expense 358,000 Subtotal - Debt Service 597,630 Contract Services 1,000 Assessment Administration 53,190 Admin./General Overhead 800 Total Proposed Uses $ 652,620 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ 12,970 Community Facilities District No. 2001-01 (Improvement Area No. 1 and 2) 3 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #10 P241 Resolution No. 17-065 e+ N a O � n V Q C E< � E w o q �) Ad AJJayC) c U N W I r C CJ] I tOn L O r Q i V 1 CO m LL -- uw jAb'ISe3'i ■ � v ._ !ny BI)MmB Ay epUeMI3 aaJ e 1aw (� Ay Jalsayooa � ny Je1sayoo3 Ay ua>I!II!W f'--•■--•— ny uaM1II1IN i i ny uaneH 1 ny uaneH i ny esouJJaH 1 f _ Ay esOwJaH Ay pleq!LpiV AV pleq!4oJd ny u8wl!aH j W ny uewllaH Ay peJtauAE#I#j� IS ue!IawaoB 1 1 SEE �LaA s E i 1�tjig., I Ay anoJD AV sits 6 i B 16 tea, NNs m 3 En it •,.•-•• CO � ,4LLi■•tii Laz;Eldt■i!�� Community Facilities District No. 2001-01 (Improvement Area No. 1 and 2) 4 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #10 P242 RESOLUTION NO. 17-066 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2001-01 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 3) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017/18 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, (hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body of the local Agency"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code for the State of California. This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as Community Facilities District No. 2001-01 (Improvement Area No. 3) (hereinafter referred to as the "District"); and WHEREAS, at this time, bonds were previously issued for purposes of financing the project facilities for said District (the "Prior Special Tax Bonds"); and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said District, and this legislative body, by the adoption of Resolution No. 15-150 on August 5, 2015, previously established the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the fiscal year based, in part, upon the debt service payable on the Prior Special Tax Bonds; and WHEREAS, on July 30, 2015, special tax refunding bonds were issued by the District to refund the Prior Special Tax Bonds resulting in a reduction in the debt service payable from the special taxes levied within the District. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the special tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for Fiscal Year 2017/18 for the District are hereby determined and established as set forth in the attached, referenced and incorporated in the Annual Status Report. SECTION 3: That the rates as set forth in such Annual Status Report do not exceed the amount as previously authorized by Ordinance of this legislative body, and are not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the special tax are used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: A. Payment of principal of and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness; B. Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds; C. Payment of costs and expenses of administering the District and any bonds of the District; and D. Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate. Resolution No. 17-066 — Page 1 of 2 ATTACHMENT #11 P243 The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. SECTION 5: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax. SECTION 6: All monies above collected shall be paid into the District funds, including but not limited to, any special tax fund, bond fund, and reserve fund. SECTION 7: The County Auditor is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land effected in a space marked "public improvements, special tax", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special tax, and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Annual Status Report. SECTION 8: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties, and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 19'h day of July, 2017. Resolution No. 17-066 — Page 2 of 2 ATTACHMENT #11 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2001-01 IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 3 ANNUAL STATUS REPORT JULY, 2017 P244 lWach lowit� hlj� P245 Resolution No. 17-066 BACKGROUND On June 20, 2001, an election was held and the property owners within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 2001-01 (Improvement Area Nos. 3) (the "District") authorized the District to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $935,000. On August 15, 2001, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 01-019 authorizing the issuance of bonds. Bonds were issued on August 29, 2001, to share in the financing of public street improvements required for the development of the property within the District; including, improvements to Day Creek, Victoria Park, Church, Foothill, Base Line, and Arbor; landscaping improvements within public right-of-way; and storm drain and flood control improvements. On December 7, 2011, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 11-179 authorizing the issuance of special tax refunding bonds for this District. The Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Series 2012, in the principal amount of $9,093,000 were issued on December 21, 2011. This amount represented the outstanding principal balance of the original bonds as of this date. On July 1, 2015, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 15-115 authorizing the issuance of special tax refunding bonds for this District in conjunction with various other Community Facilities Districts. The Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Series 2015 were refunded with a total principal amount of $18,546,000 and were issued on July 30, 2015. By authorizing this refunding, the City Council provided savings to the property owners for the remaining life of the bond issue, that translated to a 6.29% overall reduction in the annual debt service payment paid by property owners. The special tax shall be levied only so long as required for each parcel of taxable property to discharge bond obligations. Each fiscal year, all Taxable Property within each Zone of Improvement Area No. 3 shall be classified as Taxable or Non -Taxable Property and all such Taxable Property shall be subject to the levy of Special Taxes in accordance with the rate and method of apportionment pursuant to the section below. Community Facilities District No. 2001-01 (Improvement Area 3) 1 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #12 J+z I:1 Resolution No. 17-066 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2001-01 ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FISCAL YEAR 2017/18 TAXABLE ACREAGE BOND SHARE ASSIGNED TAX PER ACRE ZONE 7-LEGGIO 37.48 8.30% $1,640.00 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2001-01 PROPOSED SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS Fiscal Year 2017/18 Budget Sources Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies $ 60,860 Interest Revenue 40 Total Proposed Sources $ 60,900 Uses Debt Service Principal Repayments $ 35,000 Interest Expense 23,200 Subtotal - Debt Service 58,200 Admin./General Overhead 40 Total Proposed Uses $ 59,240 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ 1,660 Community Facilities District No. 2001-01 (Improvement Area 3) 2 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #12 Ay uaN!II!IN Ay uaneH Ay esowJBH AV ple4!LpiV Ay uewllaH IS ue!!aweC Ay Jatsau00a ON rn W ro P247 Resolution No. 17-066 N a� AV ISe3 in v II Ad 8PUBM13 Ay Ja;say00a Ay uaNiIIIW Ay uaAeH Ay esowaaH Ad pleG!u0jV Ay uewllaH �' cn SAV p eAsu!A i �1���������� ,sa C a ap ����g�&! ]JA,16 , m in AyanaD ;` E�iI� t co s Q��; RLf i��t!=t�e Community Facilities District No. 2001-01 (Improvement Area 3) 3 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #12 P248 RESOLUTION NO. 17-067 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX RATE FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2003-01 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 1) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017/18 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, (hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body of the local Agency"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code for the State of California. This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as Community Facilities District No. 2003-01 (Improvement Area No. 1) (hereinafter referred to as the "District"); and WHEREAS, at this time, bonds have been authorized for purposes of financing the project facilities for said District; and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said District, and this legislative body is desirous to establish the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the fiscal year. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the special tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for Fiscal Year 2017/18 for the referenced District are hereby determined and established as set forth in the attached, referenced and incorporated in the Annual Status Report. SECTION 3: That the rate as set forth above does not exceed the amount as previously authorized by Ordinance of this legislative body, and is not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the special tax are used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: A. Payment of principal of and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness; B. Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds; C. Payment of costs and expenses of authorized public facilities and public services; and D. Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate. The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. SECTION 5: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in Resolution No. 17-067 — Page 1 of 2 ATTACHMENT #13 yz Vol cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax. SECTION 6: All monies above collected shall be paid into the District funds, including but not limited to, any special tax fund, bond fund, and reserve fund. SECTION 7: The County Auditor is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land effected in a space marked "public improvements, special tax", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special tax, and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Annual Status Report. SECTION 8: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties, and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 19th day of July, 2017. Resolution No. 17-067 — Page 2 of 2 ATTACHMENT #13 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003-01 IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 1 ANNUAL STATUS REPORT JULY. 2017 P250 AlfWl7inPnf A14 P251 Resolution No. 17-067 BACKGROUND On February 19, 2003, an election was held and the property owners within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 2003-01 (Improvement Area No. 1) authorized the District to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $14,645,000. On March 5, 2003, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 699 approving the levy of the special tax, and on May 21, 2003 approved Resolution No. 03-125 authorizing the issuance of bonds. The District consists of approximately 229 gross acres, of which 147 acres are designated as Improvement Area No. 1. The District boundary is located in the eastern part of the City generally west of Interstate 15, south of Church, north of Arrow, and east of the Southern California Edison easement corridor from Arrow north, to Foothill and Day Creek from Foothill north, to Church. The District is located within the Victoria Planned Community. Bonds were issued on August 20, 2003, to share in the provision of funds for the purpose of financing the acquisition and construction of the facilities which consist of Day Creek, Victoria Park, Church, Foothill, Base Line and Arbor; storm drain and flood control facilities and water and sewer improvements to be owned and operated by Cucamonga Valley Water District; and a cultural center owned by the City, that includes a performing arts center, public library and banquet hall/meeting room. On July 3, 2013, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 13-110 authorizing the issuance of special tax refunding bonds for this District. The Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Series 2013, in the principal amount of $14,170,000 were issued on July 30, 2013. This amount represented the outstanding principal balance of the original bonds as of this date. The rates for the District will not increase in Fiscal Year 2017/18 because the current rate is sufficient to meet fiscal obligations for the District. The special tax shall be levied only so long as required for each parcel of taxable property to discharge bond obligations. Each fiscal year, all Taxable Property within Zone 1, Zone 2, and Zone 3 of the District shall be classified as Developed Property or Undeveloped Property, and shall be subject to the levy of Special Taxes in accordance with the rate and method of apportionment pursuant to the sections below. Community Facilities District No. 2003-01 (Improvement Area 1) 1 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #14 P252 Resolution No. 17-067 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003-01 ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FISCAL YEAR 2017/18 Community Facilities District No. 2003-01 (Improvement Area 1) 2 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #14 ASSIGNED SPECIAL BACKUP TAX SPECIAL TAX (per acre(per acre NOTE ZONE 1 DEVELOPED Both Assigned and Backup PROPERTY $5,575.63 $6,330.86 can increase 2% every year ZONE 1 UNDEVELOPED Backup can increase 2% PROPERTY $0.00 $6,330.86 every year ZONE 2 DEVELOPED Both Assigned and Backup PROPERTY $10,086.50 $53,210.62 can increase 2% every year ZONE 2 UNDEVELOPED Backup can increase 2% PROPERTY $0.00 $16,911.76 every year ZONE 3 DEVELOPED Both Assigned and Backup PROPERTY $9,425.38 $15,059.21 can increase 2% every year ZONE 3 UNDEVELOPED Backup can increase 2% PROPERTY $0.00 $15,059.21 every year Community Facilities District No. 2003-01 (Improvement Area 1) 2 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #14 P253 Resolution No. 17-067 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003-01 PROPOSED SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS Community Facilities District No. 2003-01 (Improvement Area 1) 3 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #14 Fiscal Year 2017/18 Budget Sources Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies $ 1,067,350 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 450 Subtotal - Taxes 1,067,800 Interest Revenue 3,300 Total Proposed Sources $ 1,071,100 Uses Debt Service Principal Repayments $ 360,000 Interest Expense 655,060 Subtotal - Debt Service 1,015,060 Contract Services 2,000 Assessment Administration 42,890 Admin./General Overhead 760 Total Proposed Uses $ 1,060,710 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ 10,390 Community Facilities District No. 2003-01 (Improvement Area 1) 3 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #14 Ay ua�!II!IN Ay uaneH Ay esowJOH Ay pleq!4oJb' Ay uewllaH IS UegaweC i P254 Resolution No. 17-067 Ln CD C C C O Op r N N N L a Q C r d d D O N o AV IU 40LO tm u U J vUi L O CO 8 Q Ay epueM43 is NaaJD ed Ay JOISO430H Ay ISe3 in Ay epuerou13 AVJalsa43oa Ay uaN!II!W Ay uaneH Ay esowJaH Ay pleq!4oj/ U) Ay uewllaH Ay p eAeu!A n a �E s A OAOJ •e�-1 E�p 9 s� E�gDB'$�lE�c�c� �EL��i'ECro♦;Ee Community Facilities District No. 2003-01 (Improvement Area 1) 4 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #14 Lq T CO U = Ay ISe3 in Ay epuerou13 AVJalsa43oa Ay uaN!II!W Ay uaneH Ay esowJaH Ay pleq!4oj/ U) Ay uewllaH Ay p eAeu!A n a �E s A OAOJ •e�-1 E�p 9 s� E�gDB'$�lE�c�c� �EL��i'ECro♦;Ee Community Facilities District No. 2003-01 (Improvement Area 1) 4 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #14 P255 RESOLUTION NO. 17-068 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2003-01 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 2) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017/18 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, (hereinafter referred to as the 'legislative body of the local Agency"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code for the State of California. This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as Community Facilities District No. 2003-01 (Improvement Area No. 2) (hereinafter referred to as the "District"); and WHEREAS, at this time, bonds have been authorized for purposes of financing the project facilities for said District; and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said District, and this legislative body is desirous to establish the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the fiscal year. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the special tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for Fiscal Year 2017/18 for the referenced District are hereby determined and established as set forth in the attached, referenced and incorporated in the Annual Status Report. SECTION 3: That the rate as set forth above does not exceed the amount as previously authorized by Ordinance of this legislative body, and is not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the special tax are used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: A. Payment of principal of and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness; B. Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds; C. Payment of costs and expenses of authorized public facilities and public services; and D. Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate. The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. SECTION 5: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in Resolution No. 17-068 — Page 1 of 2 ATTACHMENT #15 P256 cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax. SECTION 6: All monies above collected shall be paid into the District funds, including but not limited to, any special tax fund, bond fund, and reserve fund. SECTION 7: The County Auditor is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land effected in a space marked "public improvements, special tax", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special tax, and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Annual Status Report. SECTION 8: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties, and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 19th day of July, 2017. Resolution No. 17-068 — Page 2 of 2 ATTACHMENT #15 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003-01 IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 2 ANNUAL STATUS REPORT JULY, 2017 P257 AA1_lr_timr_t4 #-Ito P258 Resolution No. 17-068 BACKGROUND On February 19, 2003, an election was held and the property owners within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 2003-01 (Improvement Area No. 2) (the "District") authorized the District to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $2,855,000. On March 5, 2003, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 699 approving the levy of the special tax, and on May 21, 2003, approved Resolution No. 03-125 authorizing the issuance of bonds. The District consists of approximately 229 gross acres, of which 82 acres are designated as Improvement Area No. 2 (Zones 1 and 2). The District boundary is located in the eastern part of the City generally west of Interstate 15, south of Church, north of Arrow and east of Southern California Edison easement corridor from Arrow north, to Foothill and Day Creek from Foothill north, to Church. The District is located within the Victoria Planned Community. Bonds were issued on August 20, 2003, to share in the provision of funds for the purpose of financing the acquisition and construction of the facilities which consist of Day Creek, Victoria Park, Church, Foothill, Base Line and Arbor; storm drain and flood control facilities and water and sewer improvements to be owned and operated by Cucamonga Valley Water District; and a cultural center owned by the City, that includes a performing arts center, public library and banquet hall/meeting room. On September 17, 2013, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 13-162 authorizing the issuance of special tax refunding bonds for this District. The Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Series 2013, in the principal amount of $2,784,000 were issued on September 30, 2013. This amount represented the outstanding principal balance of the original bonds as of this date. The rates for the District will not increase in Fiscal Year 2017/18 because the current rate is sufficient to meet fiscal obligations for the district. The special tax shall be levied only so long as required for each parcel of taxable property to discharge bond obligations. Each fiscal year, all Taxable Property within Zone 1 and Zone 2 of the District shall be classified as Developed Property or Undeveloped Property, and shall be subject to the levy of Special Taxes in accordance with the rate and method of apportionment determined pursuant to the sections below. Community Facilities District No. 2003-01 (Improvement Area 2) 1 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #16 P259 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003-01 ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FISCAL YEAR 2017/18 ASSIGNED SPECIAL TAX (per acre ZONE 1 DEVELOPED PROPERTY $2,447.59 ZONE 1 UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY $0.00 ZONE 2 DEVELOPED PROPERTY $7,438.74 ZONE 2 UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY $0.00 BACKUP SPECIAL TAX (per acre Resolution No. 17-068 NOTE Both Assigned and Backup can increase $4,103.58 2% every year $4,103.58 $12,433.45 $12,433.45 Backup can increase 2% every year Both Assigned and Backup can increase 2% every year Backup can increase 2% every year Community Facilities District No. 2003-01 (Improvement Area 2) 2 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #16 P260 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003-01 PROPOSED SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS Resolution No. 17-068 Fiscal Year 2017/18 Budget Sources Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies $ 199,040 Interest Revenue 1,360 Total Proposed Sources $ 200,400 Uses Debt Service: Principal Repayments Interest Expense Subtotal - Debt Service Contract Services Assessment Administration Admin./General Overhead Total Proposed Uses $ 74,000 110,430 184,430 2,500 10,670 250 $ 197,850 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ 2,550 Community Facilities District No. 2003-01 (Improvement Area 2) 3 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #16 Ay uaN!II!W Ay uaneH Ay esowJaH AV ple4!LpiV Ay uewllaH 1S uellaweD Ay Ja;sa14008 V) c C CO M Ay k*O C J P261 Resolution No. 17-068 Ay tse3 in Ay ePueMj3 Ay Jalsayooa Ay uaM!II!W Ay uaAeH Ay esowIaH Ay pleG!4orb' •(7i Ay uewllaH Cns Ay peAeu!A #i' pie a�'s•�a�#�g� F Ay anoJE) [O C' fn �.E.` LL pasal �" t LLP�i@t�.E�O Community Facilities District No. 2003-01 (Improvement Area 2) 4 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #16 P262 RESOLUTION NO. 17-069 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2004-01 (RANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATES) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017/18 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, (hereinafter referred to as the 'legislative body of the local Agency"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code for the State of California. This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as Community Facilities District No. 2004-01 (Rancho Etiwanda Estates) (hereinafter referred to as the "District"); and WHEREAS, at this time, bonds have been authorized for purposes of financing the project facilities for said District; and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said District, and this legislative body is desirous to establish the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the fiscal year. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the special tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for Fiscal Year 2017/18 for the referenced District is hereby determined and established asset forth in the attached, referenced and incorporated in the Annual Status Report. SECTION 1 That the rate asset forth above does not exceed the amount as previously authorized by Ordinance of this legislative body, and is not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the special tax are used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: A. Payment of principal of and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness; B. Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds; C. Payment of costs and expenses of authorized public facilities and public services; and D. Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate. The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. SECTION 5: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax. Resolution No. 17-069 — Page 1 of 2 ATTACHMENT #17 P263 SECTION 6: All monies above collected shall be paid into the District funds, including but not limited to, any special tax fund, bond fund, and reserve fund. SECTION 7: The County Auditor is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land effected in a space marked "public improvements, special tax", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special tax, and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Annual Status Report. SECTION & The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties, and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 19th day of July, 2017. Resolution No. 17-069 — Page 2 of 2 ATTACHMENT #17 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2004-01 RANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATES ANNUAL STATUS REPORT JULY, 2017 P264 joa ch mepl-k *10 P265 Resolution No. 17-069 BACKGROUND On September 15, 2004, an election was held and the property owners within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 2004-01 (the "District") authorized the District to incur bonded indebtedness in the maximum principal amount of $45,000,000. On October 6, 2004, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 735 approving the levy of the special tax, and on June 7, 2006 approved Resolution No. 06-185 authorizing the issuance of bonds. Bonds were issued on July 13, 2006 to share in the provision of funds for the acquisition and construction of certain public facilities, to serve property located within the District. The District was authorized to finance the following improvements: • Day Creek Boulevard - grading, storm drain, sewer, water, dry utilities, streets and landscaping, • Etiwanda Avenue - grading, sewer, water, dry utilities, streets and landscaping; • Cucamonga Valley Water District ("CVWD") reservoir transmission main, • Storm drain facilities including the northern property line storm drain and the Etiwanda Avenue storm drain, • Park facilities, • Equestrian facilities, • School facilities now owned by the Etiwanda School District and by the Chaffey Joint Union High School District, • Water and sewer facilities now owned by CVWD which were authorized and financed from the proceeds of capacity charges levied by CVWD, • Flood control facilities now owned by the San Bernardino County Flood Control District, and • Open space owned by the County of San Bernardino. On January 15, 2014, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 14-005 authorizing the issuance of special tax refunding bonds for this District. The Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Series 2014 in the principal amount of $34,384,000 were issued on February 07, 2014. This amount represented the outstanding principal of the original bonds as of this date. The rates for the District will not increase in Fiscal Year 2017/18 because the current rate is sufficient to meet fiscal obligations for the district. The special tax shall be levied only so long as required for each parcel of taxable property to discharge bond obligations. Community Facilities District No. 2004-01 (Rancho Etiwanda Estates) 1 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #18 Resolution No. 17-069 TERM OF SPECIAL TAX The Special Tax shall be levied for a period not to exceed fifty years commencing with Fiscal Year 2005/06 provided, however, that special taxes will cease to be levied in an earlier fiscal year if the Community Facilities District Administrator has determined (i) that all required interest and principal payments on the District's bonds have been paid; and (ii) all authorized facilities have been constructed. ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX Land Use Category 1 -Residential Property 2 -Residential Property 3 -Residential Property 4 -Residential Property 5 -Residential Property 6 -Non -Residential Property FISCAL YEAR 2017/18 Developed Floor Area Greater than 4,000 sq ft 3,801 - 4,000 sq ft 3,601 - 3,800 sq ft 3,401 - 3,600 sq ft Less than 3,400 sq ft NA P266 Maximum Special Actual Special Tax Tax $5,555 per unit $5,194 per unit $5,325 per unit $4,979 per unit $5,151 per unit $4,817 per unit $4,896 per unit $4,578 per unit $4,410 per unit $4,124 per unit $14,800 per acre $0.00 per acre Community Facilities District No. 2004-01 (Rancho Etiwanda Estates) 2 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #18 P267 Resolution No. 17-069 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2004-01 PROPOSED SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS Community Facilities District No. 2004-01 (Rancho Etiwanda Estates) 3 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #18 Fiscal Year 2017/18 Budget Sources Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies $ 2,480,100 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 23,500 Subtotal - Taxes 2,503,600 Interest Revenue 11,240 Total Proposed Sources $ 2,514,840 Uses Debt Service Principal Repayments $ 1,050,000 Interest Expense 1,306,750 Subtotal - Debt Service 2,356,750 Contract Services 2,000 Assessment Administration 33,650 Admin./General Overhead 1,050 Total Proposed Uses $ 2,393,450 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ 121,390 Community Facilities District No. 2004-01 (Rancho Etiwanda Estates) 3 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #18 Ay ua�!II!W Ay uaneH Ay esouuaH Ay P!eq!4pjd Ay uewIIBH IS ue!lauweO Ay JaWayooa P268 Resolution No. 17-069 .�_..�—J Ad We3 C75 ny epu eMi;3 � I - Ay ua)Ull!W Community Facilities District No. 2004-01 (Rancho Etiwanda Estates) 4 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #18 N _N r 1= r J N U U C Lq 0 Ay A.uay3 Ln CN � o m � C g 3 k, .�_..�—J Ad We3 C75 ny epu eMi;3 � I - Ay ua)Ull!W Community Facilities District No. 2004-01 (Rancho Etiwanda Estates) 4 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #18 P269 RESOLUTION NO. 17-070 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2006-01 (VINTNER'S GROVE) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017/18 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, (hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body of the local Agency"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code for the State of California. This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as Community Facilities District No. 2006-01 (Vintner's Grove) (hereinafter referred to as the "District"); and WHEREAS, at this time, bonds were previously issued for purposes of financing the project facilities for said District (the "Prior Special Tax Bonds"); and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said District, and this legislative body, by the adoption of Resolution No. 15-151 on August 5, 2015, established the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the fiscal year based, in part, upon the debt service payable on the Prior Special Tax Bonds; and WHEREAS, on July 30, 2015, special tax refunding bonds were issued by the District to refund the Prior Special Tax Bonds resulting in a reduction in the debt service payable from the special taxes levied within the District; and NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the special tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for Fiscal Year 2017/18 for the District are hereby determined and established as set forth in the attached, referenced and incorporated in the Annual Status Report. SECTION 3: That the rates as set forth in such Annual Status Report do not exceed the amount as previously authorized by Ordinance of this legislative body, and are not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the special tax are used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: A. Payment of principal of and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness; B. Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds; C. Payment of costs and expenses of administering the District and any bonds of the District; and D. Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate. Resolution No. 17-070 — Page 1 of 2 ATTACHMENT #19 P270 The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. SECTION 5: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax. SECTION 6: All monies above collected shall be paid into the District funds, including but not limited to, any special tax fund, bond fund, and reserve fund. SECTION 7: The County Auditor is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land effected in a space marked "public improvements, special tax", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special tax, and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Annual Status Report. SECTION 8: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties, and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 19'h day of July, 2017. Resolution No. 17-070 — Page 2 of 2 ATTACHMENT #19 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2006-01 VINTNER'S GROVE ANNUAL STATUS REPORT Pill A'AKISF7 P271 44cichW_0(4 - 0-1-0 P272 Resolution No. 17-070 BACKGROUND On October 18, 2006, an election was held and the property owners within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 2006-01 (Vintner's Grove) (the "District") authorized the District to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $5,800,000. On November 1, 2006, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 769 approving the levy of the special tax, and on December 20, 2006 approved Resolution No. 06-401 authorizing the issuance of bonds. The District boundary is located on the south side of Arrow, east of Center, north of 26th and west of Haven. Bonds were issued on January 25, 2007, to share in the provision of funds for the acquisition of street improvements, landscape improvements within the public right-of- way, and water and sewer improvements. On July 1, 2015, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 15-115 authorizing the issuance of special tax refunding bonds for this District in conjunction with various other Community Facilities Districts. The Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Series 2015 were refunded with a total principal amount of $18,546,000 and were issued on July 30, 2015. By authorizing this refunding, the City Council provided savings to the property owners for the remaining life of the bond issue, that translated to a 37.85% overall reduction in the annual debt service payment paid by property owners. This special tax shall be levied only so long as required for each parcel of taxable property to discharge bond obligations. Each fiscal year, all Taxable Property within the District shall be classified as Developed Property or Undeveloped Property, and shall be subject to the levy of Special Taxes in accordance with the rate and method of apportionment determined pursuant to the section below. Community Facilities District No. 2006-01 1 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #20 Resolution No. 17-070 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2006-01 (VINTNER'S GROVE) ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FISCAL YEAR 2017/18 Floor Plan Home Size (Sq. Ft.) Number of Units Special Tax Tri-Plex Plan 1 1,335 26 $1,444.32 Tri-Plex Plan 2 1,803 26 $1,664.32 Tri-Plex Plan 3 1,920 26 $1,723.98 SFD Plan 4 2,188 28 $1,932.18 SFD Plan 5 2,627 28 $2,099.98 SFD Plan 6 3,173 22 $2,291.39 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2006-01 PROPOSED SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS Fiscal Year 2017/18 Budget Sources Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies $ 286,070 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 2,500 Subtotal - Taxes 288,570 Interest Revenue 1,630 Total Proposed Sources $ 290,200 Uses Debt Service Principal Repayments Interest Expense Subtotal - Debt Service Contract Services Assessment Administration Admin./General Overhead Total Proposed Uses Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance Community Facilities District No. 2006-01 Fiscal Year 2017/18 $ 120,000 139,640 259,640 1,000 21,690 440 $ 282,770 $ 7,430 2 ATTACHMENT #20 P273 P274 Resolution No. 17-070 t� m o L, E o N o Q = U U u, -o Q�1 �Ly ny we4o N CO I s � I ---- � � nb' lSe3 65 um I --- - o ny epueMg3 ny epueM113 e i{aaa� 8a z AVJGWO4=8 e - -...- .-_�... I nyae4sa4aoH ny uaNIIIIW r" "" 4 ` AV UaNIIIIW � I ny uaneH pny uaneH ny esouuaH I � E ny esowaaH ny pleppiV ny pleg4ojV ny uewIIBH i — -CO"!-'-AV uewllaH s i r ny p6LaulA 3S Ue!18UX0 1 {� aid AV anon Cn E8 all it �P;�; CD 01 ° 9B ea (sip � • g Community Facilities District No. 2006-01 3 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #20 P275 RESOLUTION NO. 17-071 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2006-02 (AMADOR ON ROUTE 66) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017/18 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, (hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body of the local Agency"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code for the State of California. This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as Community Facilities District No. 2006-02 (Amador on Route 66) (hereinafter referred to as the "District"); and WHEREAS, at this time, bonds were previously issued for purposes of financing the project facilities for said District (the "Prior Special Tax Bonds"); and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said District, and this legislative body, by the adoption of Resolution No. 15-152 on August 5, 2015, established the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the fiscal year based, in part, upon the debt service payable on the Prior Special Tax Bonds; and WHEREAS, on July 30, 2015, special tax refunding bonds were issued by the District to refund the Prior Special Tax Bonds resulting a reduction in the debt service payable from the special taxes levied within the District. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the special tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for Fiscal Year 2017/18 for the District is hereby determined and established as set forth in the attached, referenced and incorporated in the Annual Status Report. SECTION 3: That the rates as set forth in such Annual Status Report do not exceed the amount as previously authorized by Ordinance of this legislative body, and are not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the special tax are used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: A. Payment of principal of and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness; B. Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds; C. Payment of costs and expenses of administering the District and any bonds of the District; and D. Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate. Resolution No. 17-071 — Page 1 of 2 ATTACHMENT #21 y*i:J The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. SECTION 5: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax. SECTION 6: All monies above collected shall be paid into the District funds, including but not limited to, any special tax fund, bond fund, and reserve fund. SECTION 7: The County Auditor is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land effected in a space marked "public improvements, special tax", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special tax, and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Annual Status Report. SECTION 8: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties, and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 19`h day of July, 2017. Resolution No. 17-071 — Page 2 of 2 ATTACHMENT #21 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2006-02 AMADOR ON ROUTE 66 /_1`I1,01_1 W--1f_1%tt" N =1001:41 JULY. 2017 P277 d.i�ll/NINALfI ��%�i P278 Resolution No. 17-071 BACKGROUND On October 18, 2006, an election was held and the property owners within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 2006-02 (Amador on Route 66) (the "District") authorized the District to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $2,980,000. On November 1, 2006, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 770 approving the levy of the special tax, and on December 20, 2006 approved Resolution No. 06-402 authorizing the issuance of bonds. The District boundary is located south of Garcia, east of Etiwanda, north of Foothill and west of East. Bonds were issued on January 25, 2007, to share in the provision of funds for the acquisition of street improvements, landscape improvements within the public right-of- way, and water and sewer improvements. On July 1, 2015, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 15-115 authorizing the issuance of special tax refunding bonds for this District in conjunction with various other Community Facilities Districts. The Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Series 2015, were refunded with a total principal amount of $18,546,000 and were issued on July 30, 2015. By authorizing this refunding, the City Council provided savings to the property owners for the remaining life of the bond issue, that translated to a 28.42% overall reduction in the annual debt service payment paid by property owners. This special tax shall be levied only so long as required for each parcel of taxable property to discharge bond obligations. Each fiscal year, all Taxable Property within the District shall be classified as Developed Property, Taxable Public Property, Taxable Property Owner Association Property or Undeveloped Property, and shall be subject to the levy of Special Taxes in accordance with the rate and method of apportionment determined pursuant to the section below. Community Facilities District No. 2006-02 1 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #22 Resolution No. 17-071 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2006-02 (AMADOR ON ROUTE 66) ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FISCAL YEAR 2017/18 Land Use Class Description 1 Single Family Detached Property 2 Single Family Detached Property 3 Single Family Detached Property 4 Single Family Detached Property 5 Non -Residential Property I y*k:. Residential Floor Area Assigned Special Tax Units >1,850 Sq. Ft. 1,601 - 1,850 Sq. Ft. 1,351 - 1,600 Sq. Ft. <1,351 N/A $2,015.67 per unit 33 $1,930.49 per unit 33 $1,767.30 per unit 0 $1,604.09 per unit 33 $0.00 per unit 0 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2006-02 PROPOSED SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS Fiscal Year 2017/18 Budget Sources Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies $ 181,330 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 12,500 Subtotal - Taxes 193,830 Interest Revenue 1,200 Total Proposed Sources $ 195,030 Uses Debt Service Principal Repayments Interest Expense Subtotal - Debt Service Contract Services Assessment Administration Admin./General Overhead Total Proposed Uses Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance Community Facilities District No. 2006-02 Fiscal Year 2017/18 $ 75,000 83,400 158,400 1,000 21,710 410 $ 181,520 $ 13,510 2 ATTACHMENT #22 Ay UGN!II!W Ay UGABH Ay BSOWJaH Ay Pleq!gojV Ay UewllaH I 1S uellauJe0 C 0 Ay epueAnll3 paJo Aea Ay JOISayoob P280 Resolution No. 17-071 01 N N O a+ Cb J N o U U . LO � o Ay IIJJayC) J L o a N o c J m w s 3 M o 2 m ®_ U_ Q ®4.._.._.._.._ �� AV JSB3 in ® L a v AV BPUBMIj3 - 1 Ay JOIS94008 Ay U9j!II!W Community Facilities District No. 2006-02 3 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #22 my UaneH i Ay BSOWIOH i I AV Pleq!43J`d Ay UBWIIOH el w v I Ay PJBAauln {{+ 1 �j• % s a E66s :HE DEE i 9oC °egj-e DB AV .� F�cgpPE�sf` L J m 8- a2 a N c m 00 O Q ;IBeEr�F�p u_�`�$fte6 c N l9 6gg5��fEgg�ppD���ajj€ E€R'9SEF- m E��NFe"EEu aE M391-1 ill It! 118 Community Facilities District No. 2006-02 3 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #22 P281 REPORT DATE: July 19, 2017 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Darryl Polk, CIO/ DoIT Director SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL TO AUTHORIZE A MULTI-YEAR AGREEMENT FOR CISCO SMARTNET SERVICES AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE BID PROCESS TO BE COMPLETED JULY 17, 2017 AND FOR AUTHORIZATION TO APPROPRIATE ADDITIONAL FUNDS FROM THE COMPUTER EQUIPMENT AND TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT FUND RESERVES. As of this writing, staff is conducting the bid process for a multi-year agreement for Cisco SmartNet network support services and will have a finalized report with recommended bid awards distributed to the Council as soon as possible prior to the Council meeting. Staff will also be requesting an appropriation of funds in an amount not to exceed $850,000 to account No. 1714001-5300 (Contract Services). Page 1 of 1 P282 DATE: July 19, 2017 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager REPORT INITIATED BY: Darryl Polk, CIO/ DoIT Director Ruth Cain, CPPB, Purchasing Manager Sam Davis, Senior IS Analyst — Systems Division SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF AN AWARD TO CONVERGEONE OF ONTARIO FOR THE PURCHASE OF TWO DELL POWER EDGE SERVERS AND FOR AUTHORIZATION TO APPROPRIATE ADDITIONAL FUNDS FROM THE COMPUTER EQUIPMENT AND TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT FUND RESERVES RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve an award to ConvergeOne of Ontario, for the purchase of two Dell Power Edge Servers in the amount of $99,285 funded from account No. 1714001-5605 (Capital Outlay -Computer Equipment) and authorize an additional appropriation from the Computer Equipment and Technology Fund reserves. BACKGROUND: The Department of Innovation and Technology manages computer services for the City, including backup of computer data to tape archives for disaster recovery and file level restoration. New hardware and software are necessary to meet the City's growing need for a more efficient backup system, including replacement of existing servers that have exceeded the end of their life for manufacturer support. The new backup system will utilize computer hard disks to backup and archive computer data which is considerably more reliable and more efficient than the older tape technology being used by the City's current backup system and will allow for expansion into Cloud based and other remote storage options. ANALYSIS: The Department of Innovation and Technology submitted specifications to the Purchasing Division for review and to determine the best method of procurement. The Purchasing Division prepared and posted formal Request for Bid (RFB) # 17/18-102 for two Dell Power Edge Servers and as a result to (RFB) # 17/18-102 there were four hundred and nine (409) notified vendors, eighteen (18) prospective bidders downloaded the bid documentation and six (6) bid response were received. Staff is recommending an award be made to ConvergeOne of Ontario, Inc., who is offering the best value to the City with the lowest most responsive bid response. Page 1 of 2 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CONVERGEONE: DELL BACKUP REPLACEMENT JULY 19, 2017 FISCAL IMPACT: The project to replace the City's aging data backup system was originally funded and approved as part of the Fiscal Year 2016/17 Budget. Due to the length of the process determining the specific requirements of the new data backup solution, the procurement process was delayed into the 2017/18 Fiscal Year, resulting in the original funding returning to the City's reserve accounts. For this procurement, staff is requesting an additional appropriation into the following account: Computer Equipment and Technology Replacement Fund (Fund 714): 1714001-5605 (Capital Outlay — Computer Equipment) $99,285. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This item addresses City Council Goal(s): The procurement of an updated data backup solution for the City supports the Council's goals to enhance the security and resiliency of the City's digital information. ATTACHMENTS: None Page 2 of 2 P283 P284 STAFF REPORT DATE: July 19, 2017 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Darryl Polk, CIO/ DoIT Director SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL TO PROCURE VEEAM BACKUP SOLUTION SOFTWARE AND SERVICES AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE BID PROCESS TO BE COMPLETED JULY 17, 2017 AND FOR AUTHORIZATION TO APPROPRIATE ADDITIONAL FUNDS FROM THE COMPUTER EQUIPMENT AND TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT FUND RESERVES. As of this writing, staff is conducting the bid process for a Veeam backup solution and will have a finalized report with recommended bid awards distributed to the Council as soon as possible prior to the Council meeting. Staff will also be requesting an appropriation of funds in an amount not to exceed $150,000 to account No. 1714001-5152 (Computer Software). Page 1 of 1 P285 STAFF REPORT DATE: July 19, 2017 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison. City Manager INITIATED BY: Darryl Polk, CIO/ DoIT Director�� SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF A THREE-YEAR ENTERPRISE LICENSE AGREMENT WITH ESRI FOR COMPREHENSIVE GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM (GIS) SERVICES IN THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF $403,000 OVER THE LIFE OF THE AGREEMENT, OF WHICH $116,000 IS FOR FY 2017/18, AND AUTHORIZATION TO APPROPRIATE ADDITIONAL FUNDS FOR THE CURRENT YEAR CONTRACT. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve a three (3) year enterprise license agreement (ELA) with ESRI for comprehensive Geographic Information System (GIS) services including online cloud services, local server and user software, and ancillary support and warranties for all products procured under the terms of the ELA and authorize an additional appropriation of $15,840 to fully fund the FY 2017/18 portion of the contract. BACKGROUND: In 2014, the City entered into an enterprise license agreement with ESRI of Redlands, California that replaced all transactional licenses for individual services and products with a single comprehensive service agreement providing access to desktop, server, and cloud based products and services from ESRI. This agreement provides the City with a cross -departmental spatial data management platform that directly supports several applications and services as well as indirectly supporting several accompanying enterprise platforms such as Accela Land Management, HDL Business Licensing, and Socrata Open Government services. Continuation of the ESRI ELA is a core critical service for the City, providing the framework and base data for multiple internal and public facing services. ANALYSIS: Staff is requesting a single source authorization to enter into this three-year agreement as ESRI is a singularly unique platform and does not issue agreements through value added resellers (VARs). All contracts are negotiated directly with ESRI staff, requiring a single source approach to procuring their GIS services and products. Under the updated terms of ESRI's local government enterprise agreements, the proposed annual cost for an ELA based on our City population is $150,000 per year. Staff negotiated a phased -in series of cost increases to bring the City into the new pricing, with year -one at $110,000, year two at $125,000, and year three at $150,000, which will be the estimated cost moving forward excluding inflationary increases. In addition, to the base ELA subscription, the City will maintain an ArcGIS GeoEvent server at an annual cost of $6,000. Page 1 of 2 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT ESRI ENTERPRISE LICENSE AGREEMENT JULY 19, 2017 FISCAL IMPACT: The Adopted FY 2017/18 Budget has funding allocated across multiple funds (detailed below) to cover a majority of the annual cost of the ESRI ELA for the current fiscal year. Staff is requesting an additional appropriation of $15,840 into Account No. 1001209-5300 (DoIT-Contract Services) to cover the unanticipated 10% increase in service costs and ArcGIS GeoEvent Server services for year one of the agreement. Staff will work with the respective Departments to allocate future cost increases across the appropriate funds for years two and three of the contract. Funding is included in the Adopted FY 2017/18 Budget as follows: DoIT General Fund Budget Account No. 1001209-5300 (Contract Services) $40,000 Assessment District Administration Fund Account No. 1100202-5300 $34,300 Library Fund Account No. 1290601-5300 (Contract Services) $2,560 Fire District General Fund Account No. 3281501-5300 $23,300 COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This item addresses City Council Goal(s): Maintaining the ESRI enterprise license agreement supports multiple Council goals including providing for continued public safety, enhancing parks and recreation opportunities, and maintaining the City's status as a premier community. ESRI's GIS tools continue to provide critical mission support for disciplines supporting all of these goals, in addition to several other important initiatives indirectly supporting Council's vision. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 — ESRI Agreement Page 2 of 2 P286 P287 April 13, 2017 Mr. Darryl Polk City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Dr Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730-3801 Dear Darryl, The Esri Small Municipal and County Government Enterprise License Agreement (ELA) is a three-year agreement that will grant your organization access to Esri® term license software on an unlimited basis including maintenance on all software offered through the ELA for the term of the agreement. The ELA will be effective on the date executed and will require a firm, three-year commitment. Based on Esri's work with several organizations similar to yours, we know there is significant potential to apply geographic information system (GIS) technology in many operational and technical areas within your organization. For this reason, we believe that your organization will greatly benefit from an enterprise license agreement. An ELA will provide your organization with numerous benefits including: ■ A lower cost per unit for licensed software ■ Substantially reduced administrative and procurement expenses ■ Maintenance on all Esri software deployed under this agreement • Complete flexibility to deploy software products when and where needed The following business terms and conditions will apply: ■ All current departments, employees, and in-house contractors of the organization will be eligible to use the software and services included in the ELA. ■ If your organization wishes to acquire and/or maintain any Esri software during the term of the agreement that is not included in the ELA, it may do so separately at the Esri pricing that is generally available for your organization for software and maintenance. ■ The organization will establish a single point of contact for orders and deliveries and will be responsible for redistribution to eligible users. ■ The organization will establish a Tier 1 support center to field calls from internal users of Esri software. The organization may designate individuals as specified in the ELA who may directly contact Esri for Tier 2 technical support. ■ The organization will provide an annual report of installed Esri software to Esri. 380 New York Street 909 793 2853 Attachment 1 Redlands, California 92373-8100 USA infooesn.com esri.com P288 ■ Esri software and updates that the organization is licensed to use will be automatically available for downloading. ■ The organization will act as an Esri reference site and will permit Esri to publicize its use of Esri software and services. ■ The fee and benefits offered in this ELA proposal are contingent upon your acceptance of Esri's Small Municipal and County Government ELA terms and conditions. ■ Licenses are valid for the term of the ELA. This program offer is valid for 90 days. To complete the agreement within this time frame, please contact me within the next seven days to work through any questions or concerns you may have. To expedite your acceptance of this ELA offer: 1. Sign and return the whole agreement per the instructions in the terms and conditions. 2. On the first page of the ELA, identify the central point of contact/agreement administrator. The agreement administrator is the party that will be the contact for management of the software, administration issues, and general operations. Information should include name, title (if applicable), address, phone number, and e-mail address. 3. In the purchase order, identify the "Ship to" and "Bill to" information for your organization. 4. Send the purchase order and agreement to the address, email or fax noted below: Esri Attn: Customer Service SG-ELA 380 New York Street Redlands, CA 92373-8100 e-mail: service@esri.com fax documents to: 909-307-3083 I appreciate the opportunity to present you with this proposal, and I believe it will bring great benefits to your organization. Thank you very much for your consideration. Best Regards, Jan Cunningham Small Government ELA Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc. 380 New York St Redlands, CA 92373-8100 Phone: 909-793-2853 Fax: 909-307-3049 DUNS Number: 06-313-4175 CAGE Code: OAMS3 To expedite your order, please attach a copy of this quotation to your purchase order. Quote is valid from: 04/1312017 To: 1011012017 Quotation # 20505904 Date: April 13, 2017 Customer # 61 Contract # ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT City of Rancho Cucamonga Innovation & Technology Dept 10500 Civic Center Dr Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730-3801 ATTENTION: Darryl Polk PHONE: (909) 477-2700 FAX: (909) 477-2755 P289 Material Qty Description Unit Price Total 149598 1 Populations of 150,001 to 250,000 Small Government Term Enterprise 110,000.00 110,000.00 License Agreement - Year 1 149598 1 Populations of 150,001 to 250,000 Small Government Term Enterprise 125,000.00 125,000.00 License Agreement - Year 2 149598 1 Populations of 150,001 to 250,000 Small Government Term Enterprise 150,000.00 150,000.00 License Agreement - Year 3 160678 1 ArcGIS GeoEvent Server (Windows) Up to Four Cores 365 Day Term 6,000.00 6,000.00 License - Year 1 160678 1 ArcGIS GeoEvent Server (Windows) Up to Four Cores 365 Day Term 6,000.00 6,000.00 License - Year 2 160678 1 ArcGIS GeoEvent Server (Windows) Up to Four Cores 365 Day Term 6,000.00 6,000.00 License - Year 3 Item Total: 403,000.00 Subtotal: 403,000.00 Sales Tax: 0.00 Estimated Shipping & Handling(2 Day Delivery) : 0.00 Contract Pricing Adjust: 0.00 Total: $403,000.00 Esri may charge a fee to cover expenses related to any customer requirement to use a proprietary vendor management, procurement, or invoice program. For questions contact: Jan Cunningham Email: jcunninaham esri.com Phone: (909) 793-2853 x4363 The items on this quotation are subject to the terms of this quotation and of your signed agreement with Esri, if applicable. If no such agreement covers any item, then Esri's standard terms and conditions found at http://www.esri.com/legal/software-license apply to your purchase of that item. Federal government entities and government prime contractors authorized under FAR 51.1 may purchase under the terms of Esri's GSA Federal Supply Schedule. Acceptance of this quotation is limited to the terms of this quotation. State and local government entities in Califomia or Maryland buying under the State Contract are also subject to the terms and conditions found at http://www.esH.com/legal/supplemental-terms-and-conditions. Esri objects to and expressly rejects any different or additional terms contained in any purchase order, offer, or confirmation sent to or to be sent by buyer. All terms of this quotation will be incorporated into and become part of any additional agreement regarding Esri's offerings. If sending remittance, please address to: Esri, File No. 54630, Los Angeles, Ca 90074-4630 CUNNINGHAMJ This offer is limited to the terms and conditions incorporated and attached herein. Esri Use Only: n Cust. Name = Cu t. # Pos# Nmw _ Esri Agreement # Esri, 380 New York S1., Redlands, CA 92373-8100 USA - TEL 909-793-2853 - FAX 909-793-5953 SMALL ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT COUNTY AND MUNICIPALITY GOVERNMENT (E214-6) This Agreement is by and between the organization identified in the Quotation ("Customer") and Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc. ("Esri"). This Agreement sets forth the terms for Customer's use of Products and incorporates by reference (i) the Quotation and (ii) the License Agreement. Should there be any conflict between the terms and conditions of the documents that comprise this Agreement, the order of precedence for the documents shall be as follows: (i) the Quotation, (ii) this Agreement, and (iii) the License Agreement. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the state in which Customer is located without reference to conflict of laws principles, and the United States of America federal law shall govern in matters of intellectual property. The modifications and additional rights granted in this Agreement apply only to the Products listed in Table A. Table A List of Products Uncapped Quantities Desktop Software and Extensions Desktop Software and Extensions (Single Use) ArcGIS Desktop Advanced ArcGIS Desktop Standard ArcGIS Desktop Basic ArcGIS Desktop Extensions: ArcGIS 3D Analyst, ArcGIS Spatial Analyst, ArcGIS Geostatistical Analyst, ArcGIS Publisher, ArcGIS Network Analyst, ArcGIS Schematics. ArcGIS Workflow Manager, ArcGIS Data Reviewer Enterprise Software and Extensions ArcGIS Enterprise and Workgroup (Advanced and Standard) ArcGIS Enterprise Extensions: ArcGIS 3D Analyst, ArcGIS Spatial Analyst, ArcGIS Geostatistical Analyst, ArcGIS Network Analyst, ArcGIS Schematics, ArcGIS Workflow Manager Enterprise optional servers ArcGIS Image Server Developer Tools ArcGIS Engine ArcGIS Engine Extensions: ArcGIS 3D Analyst, ArcGIS Spatial Analyst, ArcGIS Engine Geodatabase Update, ArcGIS Network Analyst, ArcGIS Schematics ArcGIS Runtime (Standard) ArcGIS Runtime Analysis Extension Limited Ouantities One (1) annual Professional subscription to ArcGIS Developer* Two (2) Esri CityEngine Advanced Single Use Licenses 1,000 Level 1 ArcGIS Online Named Users 1,000 Level 2 ArcGIS Online Named Users 110,000 ArcGIS Online Service Credits 1,000 Level 1 ArcGIS Enterprise Named Users 1,000 Level 2 ArcGIS Enterprise Named Users 15 Insights for ArcGIS OTHER BENEFITS Number of Esri User Conference registrations provided annually 5 Number of Tier 1 Help Desk individuals authorized to call Esri 5 Maximum number of sets of backup media, if requested** 2 Self -Paced e -Learning Uncapped Five percent (5%) discount on all individual commercially available instructor -led training classes at Esri facilities purchased outside this Agreement (Discount does not apply to Small Enterprise Training Package.) * Maintenance is not provided for these items Page I of 5 03/03/2017 P290 "Additional sets of backup media may be purchased for a fee Customer may accept this Agreement by signing and returning the whole Agreement with a signed sales quotation, purchase order, or other document that matches the Quotation and references this Agreement ("Ordering Document"). ADDITIONAL OR CONFLICTING TERMS IN CUSTOMER'S ORDERING DOCUMENT WILL NOT APPLY, AND THE TERMS OF THIS AGREEMENT WILL GOVERN. This Agreement is effective as of the date of Esri's receipt of Customer's Ordering Document incorporating this Agreement by reference, unless otherwise agreed to by the parties ("Effective Date"). Term of Agreement: Three 3) years This Agreement supersedes any previous agreements, proposals, presentations, understandings, and arrangements between the parties relating to the licensing of the Products. Except as provided in Article 4—Product Updates, no modifications can be made to this Agreement. Accepted and Agreed: (Customer) By: Authorized Signature Printed Name: Title: Date: Contact. Address: City, State, Postal Code: Country: Quotation Number (if applicable): CUSTOMER CONTACT INFORMATION Telephone: Fax: E-mail: Page 2 of 5 03 03 2017 P291 1.0 -ADDITIONAL DEFINITIONS In addition to the definitions provided in the License Agreement, the following definitions apply to this Agreement: "Deploy", "Deployed" and "Deployment" mean to redistribute and install the Products and related Authorization Codes within Customer's organization(s). "Fee" means the fee set forth in the Quotation. "Case" means a failure of the Software or Online Services to operate according to the Documentation where such failure substantially impacts operational or functional performance. "License Agreement" means the applicable license agreement for Esri Products incorporated by this reference that is (i) found at http://www.esri.com/Ieeal/software-license and available in the installation process requiring acceptance by electronic acknowledgment or (ii) a signed Esri license agreement that supersedes such electronically acknowledged license agreement. "Maintenance" means Tier 2 Support, Product updates, and Product patches provided to Customer during the Term of Agreement. "Product(s)" means the products identified in Table A— List of Products and any updates to the list Esri provides in writing. "Quotation" means the offer letter and quotation provided separately to Customer. "Technical Support" means the technical assistance for attempting resolution of a reported Case through error correction, patches, hot fixes, workarounds, replacement deliveries, or any other type of Product corrections or modifications. "Tier 1 Help Desk" means Customer's point of contact(s) to provide all Tier 1 Support within Customer's organization(s). "Tier 1 Support" means the Technical Support provided by the Tier 1 Help Desk. "Tier 2 Support" means the Technical Support provided to the Tier 1 Help Desk when a Case cannot be resolved through Tier 1 Support. Customer will receive Tier 2 Support from Esri. 2.0 -ADDITIONAL GR:AN'r OF LICENSE 2.1 Grant of License. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, Esri grants to Customer a personal, nonexclusive, nontransferable license solely to use, copy, and Deploy quantities of the Products listed in Table A—List of Products for the term provided on the first page (i) for the applicable Fee and (ii) in accordance with the License Agreement. 2.2 Consultant Access. Esri grants Customer the right to permit Customer's consultants or contractors to use the Products exclusively for Customer's benefit. Customer will be solely responsible for compliance by consultants and contractors with this Agreement and will ensure that the consultant or contractor discontinues use of Products upon completion of work for Customer. Access to or use of Products by consultants or contractors not exclusively for Customer's benefit is prohibited. Customer may not permit its consultants or contractors to install Software or Data on consultant, contractor, or third - party computers or remove Software or Data from Customer locations, except for the purpose of hosting the Software or Data on Contractor Servers for the benefit of Customer. 3.0—TERM, TERMINATION, AND E\PIRATION 3.1 Term. This Agreement and all licenses hereunder will commence on the Effective Date and continue for the duration identified in the Term of Agreement, unless this Agreement is terminated earlier as provided herein. Customer is only authorized to use Products during the Term of Agreement. For an Agreement with a limited term, Esri does not grant Customer an indefinite or a perpetual license to Products. 3.2 No Use upon Agreement Expiration or Termination. All Product licenses, all Maintenance, and Esri User Conference registrations terminate on expiration or termination of this Agreement. 3.3 Termination for a Material Breach. Either party may terminate this Agreement for a material breach by the other party. The breaching party will have thirty (30) days from the date of written notice to cure any material breach. 3.4 Termination for Lack of Funds. For an Agreement with government or government-owned entities, either party may terminate this Agreement before any subsequent year if Customer is unable to secure funding through the legislative or governing body's approval process. Page 3 of 5 03/03/2017 P292 3.5 Follow-on Term. If the parties enter into another agreement substantially similar to this Agreement for an additional term, the effective date of the follow-on agreement will be the day after the expiration date of this Agreement. 4.0 -PRODUCT UPDATES 4.1 Future Updates. Esri reserves the right to update the list of Products in Table A—List of Products by providing written notice to Customer. Customer may continue to use all Products that have been Deployed, but support and upgrades for deleted items may not be available. As new Products are incorporated into the standard program, they will be offered to Customer via written notice for incorporation into the Products schedule at no additional charge. Customer's use of new or updated Products requires Customer to adhere to applicable additional or revised terms and conditions of the License Agreement. 4.2 Product Life Cycle. During the Term of Agreement, some Products may be retired or may no longer be available to Deploy in the identified quantities. Maintenance will be subject to the individual Product Life Cycle Support Status and Product Life Cycle Support Policy, which can be found at http://support.esri.com/en/content /oroductlifecycles. Updates for Products in the mature and retired phases may not be available. Customer may continue to use Products already Deployed during the Tenn of Agreement, but Customer will not be able to Deploy retired Products. 5.0 -MAINTENANCE The Fee includes standard maintenance benefits during the Term of Agreement as specified in the most current applicable Esri Maintenance and Support Program document (found at http://www.esri.com/legal). At Esri's sole discretion, Esri may make patches, hot fixes, or updates available for download. No Software other than the defined Products will receive Maintenance. Customer may acquire maintenance for other Software outside this Agreement. a. Tier 1 Support 1. Customer will provide Tier 1 Support through the Tier 1 Help Desk to all Customer's authorized users. 2. The Tier 1 Help Desk will be fully trained in the Products. 3. At a minimum, Tier 1 Support will include those activities that assist the user in resolving how-to and operational questions as well as questions on installation and troubleshooting procedures. The Tier 1 Help Desk will be the initial points of contact for all questions and reporting of a Case. The Tier 1 Help Desk will obtain a full description of each reported Case and the system configuration from the user. This may include obtaining any customizations, code samples, or data involved in the Case. The Tier 1 Help Desk may also use any other information and databases that may be developed to satisfactorily resolve the Case. 5. If the Tier 1 Help Desk cannot resolve the Case, an authorized Tier 1 Help Desk individual may contact Tier 2 Support. The Tier 1 Help Desk will provide support in such a way as to minimize repeat calls and make solutions to problems available to Customer. b. Tier 1 Help Desk individuals are the only individuals authorized to contact Tier 2 Support. Customer may change the Tier 1 Help Desk individuals by written notice to Esri. b. Tier 2 Support Page 4 of 5 1. Tier 2 Support will log the calls received from Tier 1 Help Desk. L Tier 2 Support will review all information collected by and received from the Tier 1 Help Desk including preliminary documented troubleshooting provided by the Tier 1 Help Desk when Tier 2 Support is required. 3. Tier 2 Support may request that Tier 1 Help Desk individuals provide verification of information, additional information, or answers to additional questions to supplement any preliminary information gathering or troubleshooting performed by Tier 1 Help Desk. 4. Tier 2 Support will attempt to resolve the Case submitted by Tier 1 Help Desk. 5. When the Case is resolved, Tier 2 Support will communicate the information to Tier 1 Help Desk, and Tier 1 Help Desk will disseminate the resolution to the user(s). 03.103,2017 P293 6.0 -ENDORSEMENT AND PUBLICITY This Agreement will not be construed or interpreted as an exclusive dealings agreement or Customer's endorsement of Products. Either party may publicize the existence of this Agreement. 7.0 -ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMEN"rS 7.1 OEM Licenses. Under Esri's OEM or Solution OEM programs, OEM partners are authorized to embed or bundle portions of Esri products and services with their application or service. OEM partners' business model, licensing terms and conditions, and pricing are independent of this Agreement. Customer will not seek any discount from the OEM partner or Esri based on the availability of Products under this Agreement. Customer will not decouple Esri products or services from the OEM partners' application or service. 7.2 Annual Report of Deployments. At each anniversary date and ninety (90) calendar days prior to the expiration date of this Agreement, Customer will provide Esri with a written report detailing all Deployments. Upon request, Customer will provide records sufficient to verify the accuracy of the annual report. 8.0—ORDERING, ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES, DELIVERY, AND DEPLOYMENT 8.1 Orders, Delivery, and Deployment a. Upon the Effective Date, Esri will invoice Customer and provide Authorization Codes to activate the nondestructive copy protection program that enables Customer to download, operate, or allow access to the Products. If this is a multi-year Agreement, Esri may invoice the Fee before the annual anniversary date for each additional year. b. Undisputed invoices will be due and payable within thirty (30) calendar days from the date of invoice. Esri's federal ID number is 95-2775-732. c. If requested, Esri will ship backup media to the ship - to address identified on the Ordering Document, FOB Destination, with shipping charges prepaid. Customer acknowledges that should sales or use taxes become due as a result of any shipments of tangible media, Esri has a right to invoice and Customer will pay any such sales or use tax associated with the receipt of tangible media. 8.2 Order Requirements. Esri does not require Customer to issue a purchase order. Customer may submit a purchase order in accordance with its own process requirements, provided that if Customer issues a purchase order, Customer will submit its initial purchase order on the Effective Date. If this is a multi-year Agreement, Customer will submit subsequent purchase orders to Esri at least thirty (30) calendar days before the annual anniversary date for each additional year. a. All orders pertaining to this Agreement will be processed through Customer's centralized point of contact. b. The following information will be included in each Ordering Document: (1) Customer name; Esri customer number, if known; and bill -to and ship -to addresses (2) Order number (3) Applicable annual payment due 9.0 -MERGERS, ACQUISITIONS, OR DIVESTITURES If Customer is a commercial entity, Customer will notify Esri in writing in the event of (i) a consolidation, merger, or reorganization of Customer with or into another corporation or entity; (ii) Customer's acquisition of another entity; or (iii) a transfer or sale of all or part of Customer's organization (subsections i, ii, and iii, collectively referred to as "Ownership Change"). There will be no decrease in Fee as a result of any Ownership Change. 9.1 If an Ownership Change increases the cumulative program count beyond the maximum level for this Agreement, Esri reserves the right to increase the Fee or terminate this Agreement and the parties will negotiate a new agreement. 9.2 If an Ownership Change results in transfer or sale of a portion of Customer's organization, that portion of Customer's organization will transfer the Products to Customer or uninstall, remove, and destroy all copies of the Products. 9.3 This Agreement may not be assigned to a successor entity as a result of an Ownership Change unless approved by Esri in writing in advance. If the assignment to the new entity is not approved, Customer will require any successor entity to uninstall, remove, and destroy the Products. This Agreement will terminate upon such Ownership Change. Page 5 of 03.!032017 P294 P295 REPORT DATE: July 19, 2017 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Darryl Polk, CIO/Director f -- Elena Qualls, Office Specialist II SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF AN AWARD TO TABORDA SOLUTIONS, INC. FOR THE PURCHASE OF VMWARE SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE AND SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL IN THE AMOUNT OF $66,899. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council award the contract for VMware to TABORDA SOLUTIONS, INC. in the amount of $66,899. BACKGROUND: The Department of Innovation and Technology (DoIT) has standardized on industry leading VMware software to provide consolidation of central computer servers, thereby decreasing support costs and improving management. In support of maintaining the City's computer services, support agreements are purchased to provide staff access to VMware's technical support and obtain software updates. ANALYSIS: The Department of Innovation and Technology provided specifications to the Purchasing Division for review and to determine the best method of procurement. The Procurement Division prepared and posted a formal Request for Bid RFB #17/18-103 Annual VMware Software Maintenance and Subscription Renewal to the City's automated procurement system. As a result, there were 411 notified vendors, 20 prospective bidders, and 13 bids were received. Staff is recommending an award be made to Taborda Solutions, Inc., the most responsible bidder. All applicable bid documentation is on file in Procurement. FISCAL IMPACT: Funding for the maintenance contract and subscription renewal is included in the Adopted FY 2017/18 Budget in the DoIT's General Fund budget account number 1001209-5300 (Contract Services). Page 1 of 2 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TABORDA SOLUTIONS INC., VMWARE SOFTWARE JULY 19, 2017 COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This item addresses City Council Goal(s): This item addresses the Council's goal to continue enhancing the security and resiliency of the City's digital information and network. ATTACHMENTS: None Page 2 of 2 P296 STAFF REPORT DATE: July 19, 2017 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Robert Neiuber, Human Resources Director SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH NEOGOV IN THE AMOUNT OF $179,664 PLUS 10% CONTIGENCY, AND AUTHORIZE AN APPROPRIATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $137,630 FROM THE COMPUTER EQUIPMENT AND TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT FUND FOR THE NEOGOV HUMAN RESOURCES INFORMATION SYSTEM SOFTWARE PROJECT RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Approve the Professional Services Agreement for the NEOGOV Human Resources Information System; 2. Award and authorize the execution of the agreement as a single source, in the amount of $179,664; 3. Authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $17,966; and 4. Authorize the appropriation of funds in the amount of $137,630 from the Computer Equipment and Technology Replacement Fund. BACKGROUND: The City has been working on acquiring applicant tracking software that will improve Talent Management Services, which was identified as an area of development in a 2016 employee survey. The City currently uses CalOpps.org, a job board owned and operated by public agencies, to post and accept online applications. While CalOpps was ahead of its time when developed many years ago, it now has significant limitations in automated services that can provide more efficient recruitment and hiring processes. ANALYSIS: Bids were originally solicited and received in May 2016 for an Applicant Tracking software. That process did not yield favorable results from responding bidders due to their lack of presence in public sector which directly impacts the City's applicant target market and their inability to integrate with the City's existing finance and payroll software (OneSolution). Following that unsuccessful bid process, Human Resources conducted a job market analysis, and consulted with comparable agencies to identify the best option for the City's needs. As a result of that work, NEOGOV emerged as the best solution for the City's needs that has met or exceeded the expectation of other user cities. NEOGOV, a California-based company for public sector Human Resources' applicant tracking software is the leading provider of human resource information systems for the public sector. NEOGOV will provide the City with a comprehensive applicant tracking, onboarding process and evaluation reporting. The robust, features of NEOGOV will have a significant impact on the day-to-day efficiency of many human resources Page 1 of 2 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT — NEOGOV July 19, 2017 P298 functions. Additionally, NEOGOV offers automated integration with the City's existing Finance and Payroll Software (One Solution). Staff recommends that the City contract with NEOGOV to furnish, deliver and provide human resources software on a single source basis. NEOGOV software is a web based product tailored to the public sector; it automates the City's hiring process from requisition to hire. The system allows the Human Resources Department to enhance its service delivery to both internal departments and external customers by automating the recruitment and selection process, thereby improving its efficiency and effectiveness. All documentation for this purchase is on file with the Procurement Division. FISCAL IMPACT: The City has closely evaluated one, three and five year terms and associated costs for each. Staff recommends a five-year agreement to realize a $20,000 savings over the term of the agreement. Five (5) year cost of software $179,664 Contingency (10%) $ 17,966 Estimated Cost $197,630 The Human Resources Department has been allocated $60,000 towards the purchase of the professional service and system in FY 17/18. To take advantage of discount pricing resulting from a multi-year agreement, a budget appropriation from the Computer Equipment and Technology Replacement Fund is needed in the amount of $137,630. COUNCIL GOAL ADDRESSED: Not applicable ATTACHMENTS: None Page 2of2 P299 REPORT DATE: July 19, 2017 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Jeff Bloom, Deputy City Manager/Economic and Community Development Matthew Addington, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO CONDUCT SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 911 ADOPTING A LOCAL AGENCY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (LAMP) ORDINANCE FOR ONSITE WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council conduct a second reading of Ordinance No. 911 adopting the Local Agency Management Program (LAMP) for Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems (OWTS). BACKGROUND: In order to better protect the environment and ground water quality, the State of California passed Assembly Bill 885 (AB885) which was approved by the Governor on September 27, 2000. Through AB885, the State Water Quality Control Board adopted a Water Quality Control for Siting, Design, Operation, and Maintenance of Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems (OWTS). Previously, onsite private sewage disposal systems (commonly called septic systems) and permits were issued under the authority of Appendix H of the California Plumbing Code and Board Resolution No. 89-157 (Minimum Lot Size Requirements and Exemption Criteria for New Development Using On -Site Septic Tank -Subsurface Leaching Percolation Systems) adopted October 13, 1989. ANALYSIS: In 2013, the State Water Quality Control Board adopted an OWTS Policy (Water Quality Control for Siting, Design, Operation, and Maintenance of Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems) allowing cities to create their own Local Agency Management Program (LAMP). The OWTS Policy allows for local agencies to adopt a LAMP specific to the needs of the community and will allow the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain the minimum existing 1/2 -acre lot sizes within the northern portion of the City as a threshold for allowing a septic system. City staff developed a 145 -page LAMP document that has been reviewed by the State Board and approved at their meeting on June 16, 2017. It is expected to be the first City agency LAMP approved in San Bernardino County. Page 1 of 2 P300 The City may be subject to an audit of the LAMP annually with a minimum of one audit per permit cycle. The LAMP is required to be updated every 5 years based on the ground water quality in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Each January, City staff will review the Cucamonga Valley Water District Public System Sampling Reports, the California Water Quality Assessment database and review the California Groundwater Ambient Monitoring database. From this information, staff will provide as assessment of the ground water quality in the general septic areas of the City as shown on Attachment 2. If the City chooses to not adopt this Ordinance, the City will fall under the OWTS Policy requirements for a "Tier 1" LAMP with all septic permits issued by the Lahonton Regional Water Quality Control Board with the nearest office in Victorville, California. "Tier 1" LAMP's require a minimum lot size of 2-1/2 acres for each septic system. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact is expected other than staff time to prepare an annual report to the State Water Quality Control Board. COUNCIL GOALS ADDRESSED: MID AND LONG RANGE PLANNING: The long-term goal is to be able to improve the ground water quality within the City. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 — Ordinance No. 911 Attachment 2 — Map of Rancho Cucamonga Septic Systems Page 2 of 2 ORDINANCE NO. 911 ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADDING TITLE 19, ARTICLE 28 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ONSITE WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS A. Recitals. 1. Assembly Bill 885, enacted in 2000 by the State legislature and codified in section 13290 through 13291.7 of the Water Code, directed the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) to develop regulations or standards for onsite wastewater treatment systems (OWTS), to be implemented by qualified local agencies. The SWRCB issued those regulations in 2012 as its "Water Quality Control Policy for Siting, Design, Operation and Maintenance of Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems" (OWTS Policy). The OWTS Policy allows local agencies to approve alternative OWTS, based on a local ordinance, after approval of a Local Agency Management Program (LAMP) by the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). 2. In coordination with the Santa Ana RWQCB, the City has developed a city-wide Tier 2 LAMP addressing the required elements of the OWTS Policy. 3. On June 16, 2017, the RWQCB held a public hearing and approved the city-wide Tier 2 LAMP by Resolution R8-2017-0012. 4. Following RWQCB approval of the city-wide Tier 2 LAMP, the City has prepared this ordinance in order to implement the LAMP. 5. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council hereby ordains as follows: SECTION 1. The City Council finds that the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. SECTION 2. Chapter 19.28, Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems, is hereby added to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to read as follows: "Chapter 19.28 Section 19.28.010 Purpose Section 19.28.020 Definitions Section 19.28.030 City not responsible for damage. 1 ATTACHMENT 1 P301 P302 Section 19.28.040 Public sewer; connection to. Section 19.28.050 Onsite wastewater treatment systems; when used. Section 19.28.060 Onsite wastewater treatment systems subject to Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board waste discharge requirements; City permit required; fee. Section 19.28.070 General Prohibitions, Violations. Section 19.28.080 General onsite wastewater treatment systems applicability standards; OWTS permit required. Section 19.28.090 OWTS permit application requirements. Section 19.28.100 OWTS permit fees. Section 19.28.110 Refusal to issue building permit. Section 19.28.120 Refusal to issue certification of occupancy. Section 19.28.130 State contractor's license required for installation or repair; registration fee. Section 19.28.140 Construction inspections. Section 19.28.150 Siting Standards. Section 19.28.160 Groundwater and Percolation Testing Requirements. Section 19.28.170 Septic Tank Requirements. Section 19.28.180 Leach Line System Requirements. Section 19.28.190 Vertical Seepage Pit System Requirements Section 19.28.200 Horizontal Seepage Pit Systems. Section 19.28.210 Alternative onsite wastewater treatment systems; Use of alternative systems. Section 19.28.220 Alternate onsite wastewater treatment systems siting and operational requirements; Variances permissible. E P303 Section 19.28.230 Sewer wells; cesspools; seepage pits. Section 19.28.240 Holding tanks; portable toilets. Section 19.28.250 OWTS located in proximity to impaired water bodies. Section 19.28.260 OWTS failures; Corrective actions required. Section 19.28.270 Substandard systems. Section 19.28.280 Abandoned onsite wastewater treatment systems. Section 19.28.290 Abatement. Section 19.28.300 Notice of violation. Section 19.28.310 Appeal from denial, revocation or suspension. ONSITE WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS 19.28.010 Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to establish standards for the approval, installation, and operation of onsite wastewater treatment systems (OWTS) within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, consistent with the appropriate California Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) standards and basin plans. The standards are adopted to prevent the creation of health hazards and nuisance conditions and to protect surface and groundwater quality. The City has prepared a Local Agency Management Program (LAMP) for OWTS permitting and regulation throughout the City, and that program has been approved the California Regional Water Quality Control Board for the Santa Ana Region. 19.28.020 Definitions. As used in this chapter, the following terms and phrases have the following meaning: Above Ground Dispersal System means a covered sand bed elevated above original ground surface with an effluent leach field located in the sand bed. Accessory Structures mean a subordinate habitable building which is incidental and not attached to the main building or use on the same lot. If an accessory building is attached to the main building or if the roof is a continuation of the main building roof, the accessory building shall be 3 P304 considered an addition to the main building. Includes habitable structures with sanitary sewer plumbing facilities regardless of whether a Building Permit is required, including, but not limited to, barns, guesthouses, second dwelling units, garages, storage buildings/sheds, and pool (swimming) houses/bathrooms. Basin Plan (or Water Quality Control Plan) means a plan which identifies surface and ground water bodies within each region's boundaries, and establishes for each, it's respective beneficial uses, and water quality objectives. Basin plans are adopted by the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) and State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB), and are approved by the Office of Administrative Law. Bedrock means the rock, usually solid, which underlies soil or other unconsolidated, surficial material. Building Official means the Building Official for the City of Rancho Cucamonga is the Building and Safety Services Director and is the officer or other designated authority charged with the administration and enforcement of the current adopted California Building Code, or a duly authorized representative. California Environmental Data Exchange Network (CEDEN) means a central location to find and share information about California's water bodies, including streams, lakes, rivers, and coastal oceans. CCR means California Code of Regulation (CCR, Cal. Code Regs.) is the codification of the general and permanent rules and regulations (sometimes called administrative law) announced in the California Regulatory Notice Register by California state agencies. Cesspool means an excavation in the ground receiving domestic wastewater, designed to retain the organic matter and solids, while allowing the liquids to seep into the soil. Clay is used to describe a soil particle, or type of soil texture: (i) As a soil: Particle — clay consists of individual rock or mineral particles having diameters of <0.002 millimeters (mm); (ii) As a texture — clay is a soil material that is comprised of 40%, or more, clay particles, not more than 45% sand, and not more than 40% silt particles using the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) soil classification system. Cobbles mean rock fragments measuring 76 mm (3 inches) or larger, using the USDA soil classification systems. Director means the Director of the Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Services Department. 0 P305 Dispersal System means a type of system for final wastewater treatment and subsurface discharge, which may include a leach field, seepage pit, mound, subsurface drip field, or evapotranspiration and infiltration bed. Domestic Wastewater means Wastewater with a measured strength less than high strength wastewater, which is discharged from plumbing fixtures, appliances and other household devices. Domestic Well means a groundwater well that provides water for human consumption, and is not regulated by the SWRCB. Effluent means sewage, water, or other liquid (partially or completely treated, or in its natural state), flowing out of a septic tank, aerobic treatment unit, dispersal system, or other OWTS component. Electronic Deliverable Format (EDF) means the data standard adopted by the SWRCB for submittal of groundwater quality monitoring data to the State Water Board's Internet -accessible database system, Geotracker. Existing OWTS means an OWTS that was constructed, operating, and issued a permit prior to the effective date of the LAMP. Grease Interceptor means a passive interceptor with a rate of flow exceeding 50 gallons -per -minute located outside a building, and used for separating and collecting grease from wastewater. Groundwater means water below the land surface that is at, or above, atmospheric pressure. High Strength Wastewater means Wastewater, prior to septic tank or other form of OWTS treatment component, having: (i) A 30 -day average concentration of Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) greater than 300 milligrams per liter (mg/L), and/or (ii) Total Suspended Solids (TSS) greater than 330 mg/L, and/or (iii) A Fats, Oil, and Grease (FOG) concentration greater than 100mg/L. Impaired Water Bodies1303(d) List means surface water bodies, or segments thereof, identified on the Section 303(d) list pursuant to the Federal Clean Water Act, approved by the SWRCB, and the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials (IAPMO) means an association that assists individual jurisdictions, both in the United States and abroad, to meet their specific needs by coordinating the development and adaptation of plumbing, mechanical, swimming pools, and solar energy codes. 5 P306 Local Agency means any subdivision of state government responsible for permitting, installation, and regulation of OWTS within its jurisdictional boundaries; typically a county, city, or special district. Local Agency Management Program (LAMP) means a program for the siting, design, operation and maintenance of OWTS, developed by a local agency, and approved by the RWQCB as an alternate method to achieve the same policy purpose as that of OWTS policy. Major Repair means a repair for an OWTS dispersal system due to surfacing wastewater effluent from the dispersal field and/or wastewater backed up into plumbing fixtures because the dispersal system is not able to percolate the design flow of wastewater associated with the structure served, or for a septic tank as a result of compartment baffle failure, or tank structural integrity; failure such that either wastewater is exfiltrating, or groundwater is infiltrating. Mottling means a soil condition that: (i) Results from oxidizing or reducing minerals due to soil moisture changes from saturated to unsaturated over time, and/or (ii) Is characterized by spots or blotches of different colors or, shades of color (grays and reds), interspersed within the dominant color as described by the USDA soil classification system, and/or (iii) May indicate historic seasonal high ground water levels. Mound System means an above ground dispersal system, having subsurface discharge, used to enhance soil treatment, dispersal, and absorption of effluent discharged from an OWTS treatment unit (e.g., septic tank). National Sanitation Foundation (NSF) International means a not for profit, non-governmental organization which develops health and safety standards, and performs product certification. New Development means a proposed tract, parcel, industrial, or commercial development which has not been granted one or more of the following, on or prior to approval of the LAMP: (i) Approval, or conditional approval, of a tentative parcel or tract map by the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and/or (ii) A conditional use permit, and/or (iii) Approval, or conditional approval, from the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department, and/or Building and Safety Services Department. New OWTS means an OWTS permitted after the effective date of this LAMP. Notice of Condition means a site specific document that is provided to the customer by Building and Safety Services. It is the owner's responsibility to ensure the document is recorded with the County Recorder's office. R P307 OWTS means onsite wastewater treatment systems that use subsurface disposal, including: individual; community collection and disposal; and alternative collection and disposal systems. This is also referred to as a Private Sewage Disposal System in the current adopted California Plumbing Code and may also be referred to in general vernacular by the public as a "septic system". The definition of OWTS does not include "graywater" systems pursuant to California Health and Safety Code, Section 17922.12. Percolation Test means a method of testing water absorption of the soil by using clean water to determine the dispersal system design. Permit means a document issued by a local agency that allows the installation, use, and/or monitoring of an OWTS. Projected Flows mean wastewater flows into the OWTS determined in accordance with any of the applicable methods for determining average daily flow in the California Plumbing Code. Public Water System means a system for the provision of water for human consumption, through pipes or other constructed conveyances, that has 15 or more service connections (or regularly serves at least 25 individuals daily), at least 60 days out of the year. Per California Health and Safety Code Section 116275(h), a public water system includes any: (i) Collection, treatment storage, and distribution facilities under control of the operator of the system that are used primarily in connection with the system; (ii) Collection or pretreatment storage facilities not under the control of the operator that are used primarily in connection with the system; (iii) Water system that treats water on behalf of one or more public water systems for the purpose of rendering it safe for human consumption. Public Water Well means a ground water well serving a public water system. Qualified Professional means an individual licensed, or certified by a State of California agency, to design OWTS and practice as a professional for other associated reports, as allowed under their license or registration. Qualified Professionals include the following: (i) Professional Civil Engineers; (ii) Certified Engineering Geologists; (iii) Registered Environmental Health Specialists (REHSs); (iv) Registered Geologists; and (v) Geotechnical Engineers. Replacement OWTS means an OWTS that, after the effective date of this LAMP, has its treatment capacity expanded or its dispersal system replaced or added onto. Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) means a regional water board that regulates wastewater discharges to surface water (rivers, Irl P308 ocean, etc.) and to groundwater (via land). It also regulates storm water discharges from construction, industrial, and municipal activities; discharges from irrigated agriculture; dredge and several other activities with practices that could degrade water quality. Sand means a soil particle or type of soil texture. As a: (i) Soil particle — and consists of individual rock, or mineral particles, having diameters ranging from 0.05 to 2.Omm; and (ii) Soil texture — Sand is soil that is comprised of 85% or more sand particles, with the percentage of silt plus 1.5 times the percentage of clay particles comprising less than 15%. Seepage Pit means a drilled or dug excavation five (5) to seven (7) feet in diameter with a liner. It is also gravel filled (between the liner and the soil) and receives effluent discharge for dispersal from a septic tank or other OWTS treatment unit. Seepage Pit Cap means a cover placed on the top of the seepage pit liner. Septage means septic tank sludge, in particular the partially treated sludge stored in a septic tank or (less commonly) in a pit latrine. It is one type of fecal sludge. Septage is a by-product from the pretreatment of household wastewater in a septic tank where it accumulates over time. Septic Tank means a watertight, covered, receptacle designed for primary treatment of wastewater and constructed to: (i) Receive wastewater discharged from a building; (ii) Separate settleable and floating solids from liquid; (iii) Digest organic matter using anaerobic bacterial action; (iv) Store digested solids, and/or (v) Clarify wastewater for further treatment with final subsurface discharge. Service Provider means a person capable of operating, monitoring and maintaining an OWTS in accordance with this chapter. Silt means a soil particle or type of soil texture. As a: (i) Soil particle — Silt consists of individual rock, or mineral particles, having diameters ranging from 0.05 to 0.002mm; (ii) Soil texture — Silt is soil that is comprised of approximately 80% or more silt particles, and not more than 12% clay particles using the USDA soil classification system. Site means the location of the OWTS and/or a reserve dispersal area, capable of disposing 100% of the design flow from all the sources the OWTS is intended to serve. Site Evaluation means an assessment of the characteristics of the site, sufficient to determine its suitability for an OWTS that meets the requirements of this LAMP. 0 P309 Soil means the naturally occurring body of porous mineral and organic materials on the land surface, which is composed of: (i) Unconsolidated materials, including sand, silt, and clay sized particles; (ii) Varying amounts of larger fragments and organic matter; (iii) Earthen material with particles smaller than 0.08 inches (2mm) in size. Soil Texture means the soil class that describes the relative amount of sand, clay, silt, and combinations thereof. State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) means the five member State Water Board, which develops statewide water protection plans and establishes water quality standards. Supplemental Treatment means any OWTS, or component thereof, which performs additional wastewater treatment so the effluent meets performance requirements prior to the discharge of effluent into the dispersal field. This excludes septic and/or dosing tanks. Structure means a new separate stand-alone building which is separate from the main structure and does not have a common roof line with the main structure and which requires a plumbing permit. Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program (SWAMP) means a unifying program created to fulfill the Legislature's mandate for the coordination of all water quality monitoring conducted by the State and RWQCBs. It is managed by a roundtable of monitoring coordinators from the SWRCB and nine RWQCBs. Telemetric means the ability to automatically measure and transmit OWTS data by wire, radio, or other means. Total Coliform means a group of bacteria consisting of several genera belonging to the family Enterobacteriaceae, which includes Escherichia coli (E. coli) bacteria. Tract means the development of more than one (1) lot or parcel, and/or more than one (1) structure discharging sewage wastes. USDA means the United States Department of Agriculture which provides leadership regarding food, agriculture, natural resources, and related issues. Waste Discharge Requirement means a permit issued for operation and discharge of waste pursuant to California Water Code Section 13260. 19.28.030 City not responsible for damage. D P310 The city is not liable or responsible for damage resulting from the defective construction of any OWTS as herein provided, nor will the city or any official or employee thereof be liable or responsible by reason of any inspection authorized hereunder. 19.28.040 Public sewer; connection to. A. Every property where there is proposed a residence, place of business, or other building or place which people occupy, or where persons congregate, reside, or are employed, and which abuts a street or alley located within an established sewer service district and outside such districts where required by the RWQCB, or which property line is within 200 feet of an approved available sanitary sewer, must be connected to the sanitary sewer in the most direct manner possible, provided a right-of- way and any necessary approval from the sewer service provider is first obtained. B. On property where an OWTS exists, and where such property abuts a street or alley located within an established sewer service district and outside such districts where required by the RWQCB, or which property line is within 200 feet of an approved available sanitary sewer, connection to the available sanitary sewer will be required at the time of system failure or when the building is remodeled, increased in square footage or altered in a manner as to change uninhabitable space into habitable space provided any necessary approval from the appropriate sewer authority is first obtained. C. The 200 foot connection requirement in subsections A and B above shall increase by 100 feet for each additional dwelling unit for any development in excess of a single family dwelling. For example, a 10 unit development will be required to connect to an available sanitary sewer if the sanitary sewer is within 1,100 feet [200 + (9 x 100 feet) = 1,100 feet] of the proposed development. 19.28.050 Onsite wastewater treatment systems; when used. A. Every residence, place of business, or other building, or place where persons congregate, reside, or are employed, and which cannot be connected to a sanitary sewer, must be provided with a water flush toilet connected to an approved OWTS. B. Every building, structure, or appurtenance that contains one or more waste producing fixtures such as toilets, sinks, showers or bathtubs, clothes washing machines, dish washing machines, animal wash pads, floor drains or other fixture or fittings intended to drain organic or inorganic waste material must be connected to an approved OWTS that meets the requirements of this chapter. ILI P311 C. Subject to local zoning restrictions and planning approval, multiple buildings on the same parcel, such as a main house and detached living unit or two or more agricultural housing units, may be served by a common OWTS located on that parcel, provided the OWTS is determined to have sufficient treatment and dispersal capacity for the expected wastewater flow from all buildings or facilities connected to the OWTS. 19.28.060 Onsite wastewater treatment systems subject to Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board waste discharge requirements; City permit required; fee. A. Review and approval by the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board is required for OWTS in cases where: (a) the peak wastewater flow handled by the OWTS is more than 10,000 gallons per day; (b) the OWTS is a categorized as a community system, which serves multiple discharges under separate ownership; (c) OWTS receiving high strength wastewater, unless the waste stream: (i) is from a commercial food service facility with BOD less than 900 mg/L and (ii) has a properly functioning oil/grease interceptor; (d) wastewater treatment plants of any kind or size; or (e) the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board has otherwise determined that their review and approval is necessary and appropriate for water quality protection. OWTS that are subject to the requirements and approval of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board are also required to obtain approval of the Director in accordance with the following: 1. The proposed system must be designed to accommodate the waste discharge consistent with the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board. 2. The Director will require engineered sewerage plans to be submitted by a registered civil engineer or a registered environmental health specialist with experience in OWTS design before issuing a permit. 3. A registered civil engineer, professional geologist or a registered environmental health specialist will be required to inspect the construction of the OWTS and, upon completion, to submit a letter of certification to the Director verifying the proper installation and operation of the OWTS; 4. Site evaluations, plan submittals, design and construction details, inspection, and operation and maintenance shall be consistent with guidelines and procedures prescribed by this chapter. 11 P312 5. The applicant must obtain a permit(s) from the Director and pay a permit fee(s) in an amount established by resolution of the city council. Obtaining a land use permit of approval is not a substitute for an OWTS permit issued by the Building and Safety Services Department, nor does it guarantee issuance of an OWTS permit. 19.28.070 General Prohibitions, Violations. A. No person may construct, add to, repair, alter or maintain any OWTS, sewer pipes or conduits, or any other conduits for the treatment or discharge of sewage, impure waters, or any matter or substance offensive, injurious, or dangerous to health so as to cause any of the following to occur: 1. Sewage, impure waters, or any matter or substance offensive, injurious, or dangerous to health to empty, flow, seep, or drain onto the surface of any land. 2. Sewage, impure waters, or any matter or substance offensive, injurious, or dangerous to health to empty, flow, seep, drain into, or affect any well, spring, stream, river, lake, or other waters. 3. Result in any condition which, in the opinion of the director, is unsafe or dangerous, or creates a nuisance. B. A violation of this section is hereby declared a public nuisance. 19.28.080 General onsite wastewater treatment systems applicability standards; OWTS permit required. When a community sanitary sewer is not available and the property improvement will generate wastewater, the property owner must obtain an OWTS Permit from the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Services Department. Any person, association, partnership or corporation desiring an OWTS Permit shall make an application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Services Department on a form provided by the City. In addition to any requirements outlined in this chapter 19.28, a lot will be deemed to support onsite wastewater disposal if the OWTS permit applicant demonstrates the following: A. Soils are conducive to onsite wastewater disposal; B. A sanitary sewer is not available within 200 feet of the lot; an additional 100 feet shall be added per each dwelling unit proposed thereafter; 12 P313 C. Enough area is available to install an OWTS that meets property setbacks. For new construction, 100% expansion area must be available; D. OWTS will not impact ground or surface water quality; E. OWTS is appropriately sized to serve the intended land use; and F. For new industrial or commercial development projects utilizing septic tank -subsurface disposal systems, the wastewater flow for each one-half acre gross area of land may not exceed that from a three-bedroom, two bathroom single family -dwelling unit. For determining compliance with this criterion, a flow rate of 300 gallons per day shall be considered as the flow equivalent to that from a three-bedroom, two-bedroom single-family dwelling unit. Exemptions will not be granted for industrial or commercial parcels less than gross one-half acre in size. 19.28.090 OWTS permit application requirements. The OWTS permit application shall be submitted on a form provided by the City. In accordance with the requirements of the OWTS permit application, the OWTS permit applicant must prepare and submit the following supplemental documents: (i) a percolation test, (ii) a proposed layout design, (iii) a grading plan, (iv) a building plan, (v) access to a potable water supply, (vi) and all preliminary plans required for all necessary grading and building permits. These supplemental documents shall be prepared as follows: A. Percolation Test Required. A percolation test is required when grading or other soil disturbance has occurred in the proposed OWTS location or if the applicant desires not to use the City's standard percolation rates. The applicant shall submit a percolation test report and design as performed by a registered civil engineer, registered geologist licensed by the State of California Board of Professional Engineers. All percolation testing shall be performed in accordance with Section 9.28.160. B. Layout Design Required. With percolation test data and other data in hand, the applicant must develop and submit a Layout Design for the proposed building project and specific OWTS, for review by the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Services Department. All OWTS layout design proposals shall demonstrate a one hundred (100%) percent reserve area for the active OWTS. The Layout Design must take percolation test data into account. In some cases, additional testing will include depth to groundwater measurements during a normal average rainfall year. i9l P314 In the alternative, the applicant may use the depth to ground water value used by the County of San Bernardino Stormwater Facility Mapping Tool. In some cases, the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety may conclude that a conventional or alternative OWTS cannot be safely used on the lot. Due to the potential for delays or disapproval, City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety recommends that applicants submit a Layout Design and obtain an approval before incurring costs for detailed building plans and architectural fees. The approved Layout Design will state whether a field check of completed grading by the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Services is required. The Layout Design Approval shall expire after one year from the date of issuance. 1. A layout design drawing of the proposed building construction and OWTS is required. This drawing should be prepared using standard engineer's scale on 8.5" x 11" or 11" x 17" minimum size paper. The basis for the OWTS design will be from percolation testing data and/or conditions of approval from a recorded subdivision map, parcel map, boundary adjustment, or certificate of compliance. The size of the OWTS is a function of the anticipated peak sewage flow based on the number of bedrooms, dwellings or use, and the percolation rate of the soil on the site. 2. The layout design must include the property drawn to the following minimum scales: (i) Single Family Home or Small Commercial Properties — 1 inch = 30 feet; (ii) Parcel Map, Subdivisions, Large Commercial Properties - 1 inch = 40 feet and must also show the proposed system, and 100% expansion area, including existing and potential structures, wells, streams, contours, significant vegetation (including trees), rock outcroppings, the location of all borings/tests, and the proposed house pad. 3. The proposed dwelling or development site must be located so the initial subsurface sewage disposal system (and the required 100% expansion area) functions by gravity flow, unless otherwise approved. When leach lines or pits serve a common system for two or more units, add 30% more square footage to the total absorption area, if approved by the Planning Department and Building and Safety Services Department. 4. The Layout Design shall contain the following information: (i) Site Address; (ii) Owner's Name, mailing address, and phone number; Consultant's/Contractor's name, mailing ME P315 address, and phone number; (iii) Type of proposed construction residential vs. commercial); (iv) Number of existing or proposed bedrooms; (v) Purpose of project (e.g. new dwelling, new structure, guesthouse, an addition, etc.); (vi) Specify scope of work; (vii) Vicinity Map, Scale, North arrow, Thomas Bros. Map coordinates; Property Lines and lot dimensions; (viii) Percent slope and direction of fall; (ix) Proposed OWTS design detail; (x) All known, recorded easements on or within 20 feet of lot boundaries (open - space, utility, road, waterline, etc.); (xi) Source of potable water; Location of all public waterlines on or within 20 feet of property; (xii) Location of all wells on or within 200 feet of property; and (xiii) Any soils testing information, such as deep boring or percolation test, plotted on the design. 5. In preparing a layout design, the following setback requirements shall establish minimum spacing requirements from a component to the OWTS and to structures, property lines, easements, watercourses, wells, or grading: Table 19.28.090.B.3. OWTS Setback Requirements. System Component Setback Minimum Distance Septic Tank Structure 5 feet Septic Tank Property Line, including the street/public right-of-way 5 feet Septic Tank Water Well 100 feet Septic Tank Leach Lines 5 feet Septic Tank Seepage Pits 5 feet Septic Tank Structure 8 feet Leach Lines Property Line, including the street/public right-of-way 5 feet Leach Lines Water Well 100' feet Leach Lines Leach Lines 4 feet center to center distance (See Table 19.28.090.8.3, Note 6) Leach Lines Seepage Pits 5 feet 15 P316 Leach Lines Water Mains (Public) 25 feet or 10 feet from the edge of easement Leach Lines Drainage Course 50 feet from centerline or top of bank' Leach Lines Flowing Stream/Creek 100 feet from spillway elevation Leach Lines Pond or Lake 100 feet from the high water line Leach Lines Water Supply Reservoir 200 to 400 feet from the high water line Leach Lines Aqueduct 5:1 setback to pipeline' Leach Lines Road Easements/ Right -of- 5 feet from the edge of way ultimate easement width Leach Lines Cut Slopes 5:1 setback from top of cut slope' Leach Lines Private Utility Trenches 56feet Leach Lines Ground Water 5 (vertical) feet Seepage Pits Structure 8 feet Seepage Pits Property Line, including the 8 feet street/public right-of-way Seepage Pits Water Well 150' feet Seepage Pits Seepage Pits 12 feet from edge of excavation Seepage Pits Water Mains (Public) 25 feet or 10 feet from edge of easement Seepage Pits Drainage Course 50 feet from centerline or top of bank' Seepage Pits Flowing Stream/Creek 100 feet from edge of flow line or top of bank Seepage Pits Pond or Lake 100 feet from the spillway elevation Seepage Pits Water Supply Reservoir 200 to 400 feet from the high i[l P317 Notes: 1. The minimum setback required to a public water well is 150 feet and increases to 200 feet where the depth of the dispersal system exceeds 10 feet in depth. The minimum setback may be increased if site conditions show the minimum setback is insufficient to protect groundwater supplies. 2. Where the dispersal system is within 1200 feet of surface water intake point, the setback shall be 400 feet. Where the dispersal system is greater than 1200 feet of the surface water intake point, the setback shall be 200 feet. 3. Maximum setback of 100 feet. A reduction in setback to 50 feet may be considered with engineering to demonstrate no risk of sewage moving laterally to pipeline trench. 4. The setback may increase if the 5:1 setback to a road cut is greater than the minimum setback. 5. This maximum 100 foot setback would also be applied to the top of an eroded bank or natural slope in excess of 60%. A reduction in setback to 50 feet may be considered with engineering to demonstrate no risk of sewage surfacing on the face of the bank or slope. 6. For trenches less than 2 feet in depth, a 5:1 setback based on the trench depth can be used. 7. Setback increases to a 5:1 setback if drainage is greater than 10 foot in depth. 8. Refer to 19.28.090 "Siting Requirements" for other references. 17 water line' Seepage Pits Aqueduct 5:1 setback to pipeline Seepage Pits Road Easements/ Right -of- way 8 feet from edge of ultimate easement width' Seepage Pits Cut Slopes 5:1 set back from top of cut slopes Seepage Pits Private Utility Trenches 56 feet Seepage Groundwater 10 feet (vertical) Notes: 1. The minimum setback required to a public water well is 150 feet and increases to 200 feet where the depth of the dispersal system exceeds 10 feet in depth. The minimum setback may be increased if site conditions show the minimum setback is insufficient to protect groundwater supplies. 2. Where the dispersal system is within 1200 feet of surface water intake point, the setback shall be 400 feet. Where the dispersal system is greater than 1200 feet of the surface water intake point, the setback shall be 200 feet. 3. Maximum setback of 100 feet. A reduction in setback to 50 feet may be considered with engineering to demonstrate no risk of sewage moving laterally to pipeline trench. 4. The setback may increase if the 5:1 setback to a road cut is greater than the minimum setback. 5. This maximum 100 foot setback would also be applied to the top of an eroded bank or natural slope in excess of 60%. A reduction in setback to 50 feet may be considered with engineering to demonstrate no risk of sewage surfacing on the face of the bank or slope. 6. For trenches less than 2 feet in depth, a 5:1 setback based on the trench depth can be used. 7. Setback increases to a 5:1 setback if drainage is greater than 10 foot in depth. 8. Refer to 19.28.090 "Siting Requirements" for other references. 17 P318 C. Grading Plan Review. Following Layout Design Review, a Grading Plan Review may be required by the Building and Safety Services Department as a condition of approval of the OWTS Layout Design. A field check may also be required upon completion of grading. D. Building Plan Review. Plans for a new or second dwellings must be submitted to the Planning Services Department for processing and approval. Upon submittal of the plans, the owner/agent shall meet with staff at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Services counter for a verification of bedrooms and plot plan concurrence with the approved layout. Bedrooms are used to determine the potential occupancy of a dwelling and therefore the potential amount of wastewater that will be generated. Guidelines for Determining the Number of Bedrooms: 1. Once the living room, dining room, family room, kitchen, bathrooms, and utility rooms have been established, all other rooms shall be considered as potential sleeping rooms. Dens, libraries, studies, weight rooms, sewing rooms, workshops, etc., shall be determined as bedrooms if they do not conform to the criteria listed below. 2. All other habitable rooms totaling at least seventy (70) square feet in size are to be considered bedrooms suitable for sleeping purposes, regardless of whether or not they contain closets or have direct access to a bathroom. 3. Rooms that open to a living room, dining room, family room, kitchen, or entry way, and have a single, un -obstructive opening (no doors) with a minimum 50% opening of the total wall space (minimum 6' wide) with archways or other acceptable means shall not be considered as bedrooms, due to the lack of personal privacy presented by the opening. 4. Rooms that can only be accessed through another bedroom are to be considered part of that bedroom, such as master suite and not an additional bedroom. 5. Any cases, which will require the relocation or modification of doorways, are to be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department and Building and Safety Services to address any structural considerations such as load bearing walls. This is to be done prior to approval or sign -off by the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Services. E. Proof of Potable Water Supply Required. The applicant must demonstrate the proposed development's access to a potable im P319 water supply. A public water supply should be confirmed with proof of a service availability letter from the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), or a water bill showing the property is served by a local water agency. The use of any new domestic water well will require proof of potability and be subject to reviews and approvals by all agencies involved. A copy of the Well Laboratory Report that indicates the absence of bacteria and nitrate contamination of less than 10 mg/1 of Nitrate -N or 45 mg/1 of nitrate will be necessary for proof of potability of a private well. The date of the test cannot be more than one year old. If a valid test does not exist, the well must be sampled by client's consultant for bacteriological and nitrate levels. Hand -dug water wells will not be accepted as a potable water supply. F. The applicant shall submit all preliminary plans and applications to the Planning Services Department for review prior to obtaining all necessary grading and building permits. G. An OWTS installation permit will be valid for one hundred eighty (180) days, which period shall commence at the date of issuance. Upon the expiration of the initial one hundred eighty (180) day period, the property owner or contractor may request an extension of an additional one hundred eighty (180) day period. H. Once the OWTS installation permit has been obtained, the OWTS may be installed. The OWTS shall be inspected by the city Building and Safety Services Department before the system may be backfilled. If inspection is satisfactory, the city shall approve a final OWTS permit. Any change in the OWTS plans after the issuance of a permit must first be approved by the Director. Failure to obtain approval from the Director will invalidate the permit. The approval or permit cannot be transferred. Failure to obtain an OWTS permit from the Department of Building and Safety Services is a violation of this chapter. The Director may revoke a permit or approval issued pursuant to this chapter in case of any false statement, or misrepresentation of fact in the application or on the plans on which the permit or approval was based. 19.28.100 OWTS permit fees. Permit fees for OWTS subject to this chapter and all related fees will be an amount established by resolution of the City Council. 19.28.110 Refusal to issue building permit. 19 P320 No building permit may be issued for any building requiring a sewage disposal system that is not to be connected to an approved sanitary sewer unless the applicant has received an OWTS permit. 19.28.120 Refusal to issue certification of occupancy. A. No certification of occupancy may be issued for any building that is not connected to an approved sanitary sewer unless the applicant has received an OWTS permit. B. No person may occupy or otherwise use any premises or building that has not been connected to an approved sanitary sewer or approved OWTS. 19.28.130 State contractor's license required for installation or repair; registration fee. A. No person may install, construct, alter, enlarge, reconstruct, replace, improve, recondition or repair an OWTS pursuant to this chapter unless: the person possesses a general engineering contractor's license (class A) as defined in section 7056 of the Business and Professions Code, or a Class C-42 sanitation system contractor's license or Class C-36 plumbing contractor's license from the Contractors State License Board of the State of California. B. The property owner may construct or repair an OWTS on his/her own property, which system serves or will serve the building on the property that is neither being offered for sale nor intended to be so offered, provided: Persons hired by the owner to do the subject work must comply with section 19.28.080(a); or 2. Persons hired by the owner must be hired as employees of the owner and the owner must provide workman's compensation insurance, as required by law; and 3. An OWTS permit is first obtained. 19.28.140 Construction inspections. A stamped copy of the building plans for the approved OWTS must be kept available at the jobsite during system installation and until the system passes final inspection by the Director of Building and Safety Services. Inspections of each new installation must be made to ensure compliance with all the requirements of this Code. Requests for inspection must be made at least one business day in advance of the commencement of work. In the event the Director of Building and Safety Services determines 20 there has been an improper installation, a stop -work order may be posted on the jobsite. Before any further work is done on a posted system, clearance from the Director of Building and Safety Services must be obtained. 19.28.150 Siting Standards. A. Setback Requirements. The following table provides the minimum requirements for the installation of OWTS for either new or existing structures. Table 19.28.150.A. Setback Requirements. Minimum Setback Required From (feet) Septic Tank Disposal Field Seepage Pit Non -Public Water Supply Well' 88 1008 1002 1502 Public Water Supply Well' 100 1502 200 Buildings or Structures' 5 8 8 Property line, including Street Right of Way Line 5 5 8 Streams and other flowing bodies of waters 100 100 150 Drainage Course 50 50 50 Lakes, ponds, and other surface water bodies10 200 200 200 Large Trees' 10 - 10 Seepage pits 5 5 12 Disposal field 5 46 5 Onsite domestic water lines (building service line) 5 5 5 Public Domestic Water Lines 25 25 25 Distribution Box n/a 5 5 Ground surface on sloping ground n/a 15 15 Groundwater' 5 5' 10 Notes: 21 P321 P322 1. Drainage piping will clear domestic water supply wells by not less than 50 feet. This distance will be permitted to be reduced to not less than 25 feet where the drainage piping is constructed of materials approved for use within a building. If the dispersal system does not exceed 10 feet in depth, then the horizontal sanitary setback will be 150 feet. If the dispersal system exceeds 10 feet in depth, then the horizontal sanitary setback will be 200 feet. If the dispersal system exceeds 20 feet in depth, then the horizontal sanitary setback will be 600 feet. 2. For any system discharging 5,000 gallons per day (GPD), or more, the required setback will be increased to 200 feet. 3. Includes porches and steps whether covered or uncovered, breezeways, roofed porte cocheres, roofed patios, carports, covered walls, covered driveway, and similar structures or appurtenances. 4. Any tree with a trunk diameter of one foot or more within 5 feet of the system that will not be removed during construction. 5. The highest known level to which groundwater is known to have occurred rather than the level at the time when testing occurred. 6. Plus 2 feet for each additional foot or depth in excess of 1 foot below the bottom of the drain line. 7. For any system utilizing advanced treatment, this minimum separation may be reduced to 2 feet with approval under the Advanced Protection Management Program (APMP) (refer to Chapter 12: Tier 3 -Advanced Protection Management Program for Impaired Areas for more information regarding the APMP) and the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). 8. Unless regulatory or legitimate data requirements necessitate that monitoring wells be located closer. 9. Where the edge of the water body is the natural or levied bank for creeks and rivers, or may be less where site conditions prevent mitigation of wastewater to the water body. 10. Where the edge of the water body is the high water mark for lakes and reservoirs and the mean high tide line for tidally influenced water bodies. B. On sites with natural slopes of 25% or greater, the siting and design of the leaching system shall be performed in accordance with P% P323 recommendations prepared by a licensed professional geotechnical engineer. C. Criteria specified in Table 19.28.150.A, above must be met within the area of the proposed system and within the 100% expansion area for the proposed system. Depth of earth cover required over the dispersal field is twelve (12") inches. When the dispersal field cannot be installed twelve inches below the ground surface, and meet the above separation requirements, then a supplemental treatment system will be required. D. OWTS located near public water systems shall be subject to increased setback requirements, such as OWTS located with 1200 feet of a surface water intake. E. Density and minimum lot size requirements. All new development requires a minimum lot size of one-half acre (21,780 square feet), average gross, per dwelling unit, including accessory structures, is required for all new developments, which do not have access to a public sewer as required under 19.28.040 of this chapter. The public street area adjacent to the net lot area may count towards the minimum one-half acre gross lot size for OWTS. For new development for industrial or commercial properties, the wastewater flow for each one-half acre of land may not exceed that from a single dwelling unit. When determining compliance with this criterion, a flow rate of 300 gallons per day will be considered equivalent to a single family dwelling unit. This flow rate shall be prorated for commercial or industrial developments with lots smaller than one-half acre, or the equivalent of 20 fixture units. F. Minimum Lot Size Exemptions. 1. The minimum lot size requirements do not apply to existing properties with OWTS which were installed prior to the effective date of this chapter. 2. New development occurring upon single family residences with existing septic systems that will accommodate additional wastewater flows, caused by additional installations such as rooms, bathrooms or accessory structures. A septic certification may be required to verify the septic tank and disposal field capacity to accept additional wastewater flows. 3. Tracts, parcels, and/or commercial/industrial developments which received land use approval from the City of Rancho Cucamonga prior to August 21, 2017 are exempt from the 23 P324 minimum lot size requirements and shall not be less than one-half acre per this chapter for the use of septic tank subsurface disposal systems. 4. New lots, which are smaller than one-half acre, may be formed by combining through a lot merger two or more existing lots which have received land use approval prior to the effective date of the LAMP. Individually, these lots would be eligible for an exemption from the minimum lot size requirement. Developments on combined lots may also qualify for an exemption provided that the total number of units proposed for the new parcel is equal to, or less than the total number of units proposed for the existing parcel and/or when an alternative treatment system is utilized. When requesting to use an alternative treatment system, each system will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis, and will require the approval of Building and Safety Services and the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board. 19.28.160 Groundwater and Percolation Testing Requirements. A. Groundwater Testing Procedures. 1. Test borings in the area of an OWTS shall extend to a minimum of 15 feet unless refusal is reached. Deeper depths may be required depending on site-specific conditions as determined by the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Services or the project qualified professional. Site- specific conditions may include, but not be limited to; the proposed depth of the system, local geology, soil types encountered, elevation and terrain, features on site, evidence and/or knowledge of historic ground water levels in the area, and the anticipated fluctuation of the groundwater table in times of normal to above normal annual rainfall. 2. Test borings in the area of a vertical seepage pit or horizontal seepage pit system shall extend to at least 10 feet deeper than the bottom of the proposed pit(s). 3. Since groundwater does not always immediately flow into a test boring, the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Services requires a minimum of 72 hours pass before an accurate groundwater measurement is taken. The qualified professional and/or the property owner maintain full responsibility for protecting the public from any hazards related to the test borings. It is recommended that all test borings that encounter groundwater be converted to 24 P325 observation wells so the groundwater conditions can be monitored overtime. 4. If the qualified professional does not wish to complete the test borings as observation wells, they can cover the test boring, place safeguards around the borings to prevent unauthorized access and make an appointment for the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Services staff to observe the boring at least 72 -hours after the boring has been completed. 5. During periods of below normal average rainfall, or after periods of drought where there has not yet been sufficient ground water recharge, the absence of groundwater in test borings in areas where groundwater is suspect may not mean that approval to issue a septic tank permit can be granted. It may be necessary for the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Services and the qualified professional to monitor the test borings for a sufficient period of time to determine where groundwater will rise to during normal to above normal rainfall. B. Percolation Testing Procedure. All percolation testing for dispersal systems except vertical seepage pits in the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall be conducted through the use of the following procedures. The test shall be performed by or under the direct supervision of a California registered professional engineer or geologist. Any deviation shall be authorized only after receiving written approval by the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Services. Percolation testing shall be required for all new OWTS for non-residential development and for residential development comprising more than one dwelling unit, where a percolation report has not previously been completed. A one -lot custom single family home may use the city's currently adopted California Plumbing Code, Appendix H — Private Sewage Disposal Systems, Section H 3.0 - Area of Disposal Fields and Seepage Pits, and the included Table H 2.1(2) — Design Criteria of Five Typical Soils for the design of the seepage pit or the leech field. 1. Test Holes. A minimum of four test holes is required when percolation rates are less than 60 minutes per inch (mpi). A minimum of six test holes is required when the average percolation rate is more than 60 mpi. Additional test holes may be necessary on a site specific basis for reasons that include, but are not limited to the following: (i) Unacceptable 25 P326 or failed tests; (ii) Areas of the disposal field requiring defined limits for exclusion; (iii) The disposal system is located out of a concentrated area; and (iv) Soil conditions are variable or inconsistent. All test holes shall be representative of the dispersal system installation depth. If the proposed development site has any of the following characteristics, test holes must be extended below the proposed dispersal system installation depth: (i) Shallow or consolidated rock or impervious soil layers; (ii) slopes exceeding twenty-five (25%) percent; or (iii) other factors as might be determined by sound geotechnical engineering practices. 2. There shall be a minimum of ten (10) feet of soil above any imperious formation such as rock, clay, adobe, and/or water table. Fractured rock and consolidated granites will not be considered as soil. Deep testing may be required to ensure uniform conditions exist below the disposal field. 3. Depending upon the scope of grading for a project, the Planning Department may require a conceptual grading plan and Building and Safety Services may require a grading plan. If a grading plan is required it should be included with the percolation report submittal. A grading plan helps Building and Safety Services ensure testing was done at the correct depths. Where grading is expected, include the original and finished elevations in the grading plan. For details on how to complete a grading plan contact the Building and Safety Services Department. 4. Percolation testing shall be conducted by, and all accompanying reports prepared by a Qualified Professional. 5. Prior to reviewing a percolation test, Building and Safety Service may require a site evaluation during percolation testing to ensure proper system design, and evaluate site location to ensure that the system will be in compliance. For soil to be considered uniform, test results must fall with twenty-five (25%) percent of the mean percolation rate. Determining the number of percolation tests required will be based on soil conditions and project type. 6. For areas which are primarily Sandy Loam or Sandy Clay, a field design of 60 square feet per 100 gallons. 7. For areas which are primarily Clay wither considerable sand or gravel, a field design of 90 square feet per 100 gallons. 26 P327 8. Percolation rates in excess of 120 minutes per inch shall be deemed conclusive evidence that the soil is impermeable is not suitable for an OWTS. C. Percolation Testing Reports. All testing data and required result information shall be submitted to City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Services on forms approved by the city. A minimum of three copies is required. All reports shall be signed with an original signature and seal by the consultant who either performed or supervised the testing. All percolation testing is to be performed by a licensed civil engineer or geologist registered in the State of California. 19.28.170 Septic Tank Requirements. A. All conventional OWTS require the use of a septic tank to allow for the removal of solids in the wastewater prior to being discharged to the dispersal field. Alternative OWTS also require a septic tank unless a settling chamber is a component of the treatment unit. B. Septic Tank Requirements: 1. Septic tanks must be certified by the International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials (IAPMO). 2. The tank shall be watertight and possess two chambers. 3. Septic tanks shall be certified by the manufacturer to allow for burial without being water filled to allow for routine maintenance or to be used as a holding tank as needed. 4. Septic tanks shall be installed per the manufacturer's instructions. 5. The bottom of the excavation for the tank shall extend into native or compacted soils to eliminate potential settling issues. 6. Septic tank location must take into account maintenance and pumping requirements including vehicle access; and distance and elevation lift to pumper truck. 7. All tanks must have a capped tee or a 90 degree elbow fitting on the inlet to prevent gas exchange between the tank and the house plumbing. Inlet tees must extend at least 14 inches below the liquid level. 27 P328 8. Outlet tees must be uncapped and must extend at least 12 inches below the liquid level. 9. The outlet elevation shall be between 2 and 6 inches lower than the inlet elevation to ensure proper fall without a significant loss of volume. 10. Fall between the outlet of the septic tank and the dispersal field shall be continuous with a minimum fall that that ensures the outlet pipe is 4 inches higher than the top of the seepage pit system or 4 inches above the top of the leach rock or other components used in the dispersal system on a level system, or a distribution box if multiple seepage pits or leach lines are constructed. 11. Septic tanks with greater than 6 inches of cover must have risers to within 6 inches of finished grade. Risers and lids that are at or above grade must be watertight and lockable or require tools to be opened. 12. Septic tank risers must have a current IAPMO certification prior to use. Concrete risers and lids must be constructed of Type V concrete or be protected from corrosion from sewer gases. The interior diameter of the riser shall be a minimum of eighteen (18) inches. 13. Effluent filters must be IAPMO approved if they are to be installed as part of the outlet tee. 14. Septic tanks installed in areas of vehicular traffic must be certified to withstand the proposed loads or have an engineered traffic slab installed to accommodate the proposed loads. 15. Minimum tank size is 1000 gallons for residential and 750 gallons for non-residential structures. 16. Septic tanks shall be sized according to anticipated wastewater flows from the structure(s). The following standard sizes shall apply: (i) 1-3 bedroom single family dwelling (0-450 GPD) 1000 gallons; (ii) 4 bedroom single family dwelling (450-600 GPD) 1200 gallons; (iii) 5-6 bedroom single family dwelling (601-900 GPD) 1500 gallons; and (iv) Flows greater than 900 GPD must utilize the following formula to determine minimum tank sizing: 1125 gallons + (.75)(Flow in GPD). 28 P329 17. The permitted plan set shall contain a note requiring the septic tank to be filled with water, without leakage, at the time of the first inspection. 19.28.180 Leach Line System Requirements. A. Leach line systems are limited to soils with percolation rates of 120 minutes per inch or less. Percolation rates in excess of 120 minutes per inch are unsuitable for the installation of an OWTS dispersal system. 1. At least four percolation test holes at each leach field location should be provided to represent soil types at the depth of the proposed leach lines. At least one deep boring should extend to a depth of at least 15 feet or to impermeable material but in no case shall there be less than 5 foot of unsaturated, permeable soil below the bottom of the leach line trench. For areas of suspected high groundwater, deep borings are recommended to be 20'-25' to help determine gradients during varying rainfall periods. 2. Backhoe excavations may be required to demonstrate uniformity of soil throughout the leach field area(s). Leach line dispersal systems are limited to slopes of 25 percent (4:1) or less. B. Soil Cover Requirements. The maximum soil cover allowed over the top of the infiltrative surface is 48 inches, measured from the top of the leach rock chamber/etc. to the ground surface. The minimum cover required over the top of the infiltrative surface is 12 inches. Soil cover requirements must also conform to those allowed by the manufacturer of any gravel-less/chamber design. C. Leach Line Dimensions. Leach lines are to be installed according to the qualified professional's specifications for location, length, width, and depth. Leach lines are to be spaced at least 10 feet apart, measured center to center. Leach lines shall be installed with a width of no less than 18 inches and no more than 36 inches. Regardless of trench width or materials used, dispersal systems using leach lines shall be designed using not more than 1.5 square feet of infiltrative area per liner foot of trench as the infiltrative surface. No reduction in sizing is allowed for the use of chambers. The minimum length of leach trench for a new OWTS using leach lines as the dispersal system shall be 200 feet regardless of the projected wastewater flows. A 100% reserve area shall be required for all leach line systems. Properties that previously were required 29 P330 to maintain areas of 200% or 300% reserve shall now have a 100% reserve area requirement in place of the previous requirement. D. Materials and Construction Considerations. Leach lines shall not be placed under impermeable surfaces. Leach lines that are later covered by impermeable surfaces may not be considered as viable for purposes of determining primary and reserve area requirements. All piping and materials used in leach line systems including gravel-less/chamber systems must have IAPMO approval and must be approved by City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Services prior to installation. Leach lines that utilize gravel shall be filled with clean, washed leach line rock to a point at least 4 inches above the top of a 4 inch perforated pipe and shall have a minimum of 12 inches of gravel below the pipe. The rock shall be graded at 1 to 1.5 inches in size and shall be covered with straw, untreated building paper or a geotextile fabric prior to backfill to prevent the infiltration of soil into the rock. Where multiple leach lines are proposed on sloping ground, a distribution box must be used to connect the leach lines. Leach line trenches shall be installed with the trench bottom and materials used being level to within 2 inches per 100 feet. E. Leach Lines on Steep Slopes. The following requirements must be met for the installation of leach line trenches on slopes exceeding 25 percent (4:1) without necessitating the grading of terraces. 1. The maximum slope allowed for leach line trenches is 40 percent (2-1/2:1 slope). 2. All leach lines on steep slopes shall be installed in 5 foot deep trenches with 12 inches of leach rock below the leach pipe or with approved chambers or other gravel -less system. 3. The design of disposal systems on steep slopes requires the experience and expertise to address conditions relative to soil, slope stability, and subsurface conditions which require professional judgment and technical knowledge. Designs for steep slope systems will only be approved when submitted by a qualified professional licensed in the State of California. 4. Testing must provide data representative of the entire disposal area and demonstrate that conditions are uniform below the entire disposal area. The minimum testing required is: (i) Six percolation tests at a depth equal to the proposed trench depth; (ii) Two percolation tests five feet below the proposed trench depth; (iii) Percolation testing must show rates of 120 minutes per inch or less; and (iv) At 30 P331 least two soil profile borings demonstrating uniform conditions throughout the disposal area to a depth of 10 feet below the proposed trench depth. 5. Design reports must include the following: (i) Cross section(s) hillside soil profile(s); (ii) Detailed boring logs of all test holes and borings; (iii) Scaled layouts and profiled designs based on accurate topography; (iv) Any grading proposed on the site in the disposal area; (v) A slope stability report or statement from a qualified professional; (vi) Any grading, proposed to create a stable work area for trench installation, may be subject to review for conflict with Building and Safety Services Department. F. Leach Line System Length. Table 19.28.180. Leach Line System Length Requirements. LEACH LINE TRENCH LENGTH (feet) BASED ON PERCOLATION TEST RATE Perc Rate Number of Bedrooms Rate Perc Number of Bedrooms 1 2 ' 3 -T7 5 6 MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 MPI 1 200 200 240 270 280 300 31 280 350 420 480 535 595 2 200 200 240 270 280 300 32 280 355 430 480 535 595 3 200 200 240 270 280 300 33 290 360 430 490 545 605 4 200 220 260 290 300 310 34 290 360 440 490 545 605 5 200 240 290 320 320 340 35 290 365 440 500 555 615 6 200 250 300 340 350 360 36 300 370 440 500 555 615 7 210 260 310 350 370 380 37 300 370 450 500 555 615 8 210 265 320 360 390 400 38 300 375 450 510 565 625 9 220 270 320 360 400 410 39 300 380 460 510 565 625 10 220 275 330 370 410 420 40 300 380 460 520 575 635 11 220 280 340 380 420 430 41 310 385 460 520 575 635 12 230 285 340 380 430 440 42 310 390 470 530 585 645 31 P332 LEACH LINE TRENCH LENGTH (feet) BASED ON PERCOLATION TEST RATE Perc Rate Number of Bedrooms Rate Perc Number of Bedrooms MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 2 MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 13 230 290 350 390 430 450 43 310 390 470 530 585 645 14 235 295 350 400 440 460 44 310 395 480 540 595 655 15 240 300 360 400 450 470 45 320 400 480 540 595 655 16 240 300 360 410 450 490 46 320 400 480 540 595 655 17 240 305 370 410 460 500 47 320 405 490 550 605 665 18 250 310 370 420 460 510 48 330 410 490 550 605 665 19 250 310 380 420 470 520 49 330 410 500 560 615 675 20 250 315 380 430 470 520 50 330 415 500 560 615 675 21 260 320 380 430 480 530 51 340 420 500 560 615 675 22 260 320 390 440 480 530 52 340 420 510 570 625 685 23 260 325 390 440 490 550 53 340 425 510 580 635 695 24 260 330 400 450 500 560 54 340 430 520 580 635 695 25 260 330 400 450 500 560 55 340 430 520 580 635 695 26 270 335 400 450 510 570 56 350 435 520 590 645 705 27 270 340 410 460 515 575 57 350 440 530 590 645 705 28 270 340 410 460 515 575 58 350 440 530 600 655 715 29 270 345 420 470 525 585 59 350 445 540 600 655 715 30 280 350 420 470 525 585 60 360 450 540 610 665 725 LEACH LINE TRENCH LENGTH BASED ON PERCOLATION TEST RATE Perc Perc Rate Number of Bedrooms Rate Number of Bedrooms MPI 1 2 1 3 4 5 6 MPI 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 32 P333 LEACH LINE TRENCH LENGTH BASED ON PERCOLATION TEST RATE Perc Rate Number of Bedrooms RatePe c Number of Bedrooms MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 61 370 460 550 620 690 740 91 680 770 860 930 980 1020 62 380 470 560 630 680 720 92 695 785 875 945 995 1035 63 390 480 570 640 690 730 93 710 800 890 960 1010 1050 64 400 490 580 650 700 740 94 725 815 905 975 1025 1065 65 420 500 580 660 710 750 95 740 830 920 990 1040 1080 66 420 510 600 670 720 760 96 755 845 935 1005 1055 1095 67 430 520 610 680 730 770 97 770 860 950 1020 1070 1110 68 440 530 620 690 740 780 98 785 875 965 1035 1085 1125 69 450 540 630 700 750 790 99 800 890 980 1050 1100 1140 70 460 550 640 710 760 800 100 815 905 995 1065 1115 1155 71 470 560 650 720 770 810 101 830 920 1010 1080 1130 1170 72 480 570 660 730 780 820 102 845 935 1025 1095 1145 1185 73 490 580 670 740 790 830 103 860 950 1040 1110 1160 1200 74 500 590 680 750 800 840 104 875 965 1055 1125 1175 1215 75 510 600 690 760 810 850 105 890 980 1070 1140 1190 1230 76 520 610 700 770 820 860 106 905 995 1085 1155 1205 1245 77 530 620 710 780 830 870 107 920 1010 1100 1170 1220 1260 78 540 630 720 790 840 880 108 935 1025 1115 1185 1230 1270 79 550 640 730 800 850 890 109 950 1040 1130 1200 1250 1290 80 560 650 740 810 860 900 110 965 1055 1145 1215 1265 1305 81 570 660 750 820 870 910 111 980 1070 1160 1230 1280 1320 82 580 670 760 830 880 920 112 995 1085 1175 1245 1295 1335 83 590 680 770 840 890 930 113 1010 1100 1190 1260 1310 1350 33 P334 LEACH LINE TRENCH LENGTH BASED ON PERCOLATION TEST RATE Perc Rate Number of Bedrooms Rate Perc Number of Bedrooms MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 84 600 690 780 850 900 940 114 1025 1115 1205 1275 1325 1365 85 610 700 790 860 910 950 115 1040 1130 1220 1290 1340 1380 86 620 710 800 870 920 960 116 1055 1145 1235 1305 1355 1395 87 630 720 810 880 930 970 117 1070 1160 1250 1320 1370 1410 88 640 730 820 890 940 980 118 1085 1175 1265 1335 1385 1425 89 650 740 830 900 950 990 119 1100 1190 1280 1350 1390 1440 90 665 755 845 915 965 1005 120 1120 1210 1300 1370 1420 1460 Note: MPI means minutes Der inch. Conversion Factor example. (1 inch of drop/ # Perc Rate) x 60 minutes per hour = 6 inches/hour. 19.28.190 Vertical Seepage Pit System Requirements. A. Permitted Locations. 1. Any lot previously approved for the use of a vertical seepage pit must meet all current requirements found in this section to be considered for development based on the use of a vertical seepage pit. A new custom single family house may use the sizing criteria for existing lots. 2. New lots containing two or more OWTS units, upon the recommendation and design by a qualified professional soils engineer. B. Percolation Test Procedures for Vertical Seepage Pit Systems. All vertical seepage pits for new construction, or for 2 or more lots, will require percolation testing by a qualified professional certified to perform percolation tests in City of Rancho Cucamonga. A waiver of testing can be considered where adequate information exists as to soil types, depth and permeability. Percolation testing for vertical seepage pits shall be completed per the following guidelines: 1. A 12 to 48 inch diameter test hole shall be excavated to a depth of at least 10 feet deeper than the proposed installation depth. 34 P335 2. A minimum 10 foot separation between the bottom of the vertical seepage pit and the anticipated high groundwater level is required. 3. Boring logs shall be recorded and included with all test reports indicating soil strata depths and types and visual classification according to the unified soil classification system along with any groundwater encountered. 4. The overdrill must be checked for the presence of groundwater a minimum of 24 hours after the completion of the test boring to allow time for groundwater to stabilize in the hole. 5. After the groundwater reading is recorded, the test hole shall be backfilled to a depth 10 feet above the bottom of the test hole or the groundwater level whichever is shallower. 6. The pit shall be filled with water to the cap depth and a continuous pre-soak shall be maintained at the proposed cap level for a minimum 8 -hour period. In highly permeable soils when cap levels cannot be maintained during pre-soak, the test shall be conducted at a depth no higher than the pre-soak level which was attained. Document the pre-soak attempt with gallons of water used. In no case shall less than 5,000 gallons of water be used within a 1 hour period in the attempted pre-soak when the cap level cannot be maintained. The depth of the test shall be noted on the boring log and in no case shall the sidewall of permeable soil below the cap level be less than ten foot. 7. Upon completion of the pre-soak period, fill the pit to cap level and determine uniformity of soil by measuring the falling head. Distance to the water level shall be measured at 15 minute intervals, or more frequently if needed, until the drop stops or the pit empties. A graph of the drop in water level shall be attached to all proposals submitted by the qualified professional. If non-uniform rates persist, the soil will not be considered uniform and the tests discontinued as they will not be approved by City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Services. 8. If the procedure in Item no. 4 demonstrates uniform soil, proceed with a two-hour static head or falling head capacity test: (i) Static Head — the pit shall be filled with water to the cap depth and the water column shall be maintained at that level for two hours. The amount of water added to maintain 35 C this level must be documented. The 24-hour capacity is determined by multiplying by 12. Adjustment to a four foot diameter pit is made if a lesser size test hole is used; (ii) Falling Head — the pit shall be filled with water to the cap depth and the column of water shall be allowed to drop for a two hour period. The distance dropped shall be measured and the amount of water absorbed determined. This amount is multiplied by 12 to determine the 24-hour capacity. Adjustment to a four foot diameter pit is made if a lesser size test hole is used. 9. The minimum capacity for a new OWTS using vertical seepage pits as the dispersal system shall be 5 times the volume of the required septic tank or 5000 gallons per day whichever is greater. All individual vertical seepage pit shall have a minimum capacity of 1,667 gallons per day. 10. Each pit must meet these minimum criteria to be acceptable. The qualified professional may include safety factors as he feels the situation warrants. 11. It shall be the responsibility of the qualified professional to maintain all test holes or pits in a safe manner prior to backfill or capping to prevent a hazard or accident. Dimensions and Construction Requirements. Vertical seepage pits shall be installed according to the qualified profession's specifications for location, depth, and cap depth. 2. The pit excavation shall be five (5), six (6) or seven (7) feet in diameter. Pit excavations greater than 7 -feet in diameter require prior approval by the Building Official. 3. The sidewall depth below the cap shall not be less than 17 feet. 4. The minimum depth to the top of the infiltrative surface allowed is 2 feet. This depth is also known as the cap depth. There is no maximum cap depth but documentation must be provided to justify any cap depth greater than 5 feet. 5. The maximum slope allowed for the use of vertical seepage pits is 40 percent (2-1/2:1 slope). Slopes that exceed 25% (4:1) will require additional engineering and design detail as required to address the risk of effluent surfacing on the slope recognizable as sewage as well as slope stability issues. 36 P336 P337 Slopes that exceed 25% (4:1) will, in most cases, require a terrace design or grading to allow for drilling access. Any grading shall be in accordance with any permit requirements for brushing, clearing, and grading from any other agency. 6. All pits must be filled with clean washed leach line rock to the cap depth. The rock shall be graded at 1 to 1.5 inches in size and shall be covered with straw, untreated building paper or a geotextile fabric prior to backfill to prevent the infiltration of soil into the rock. 7. A 4 inch Schedule 40 pipe shall be installed from the ground surface to the bottom of each seepage pit for clean-out, pumping and verification of the total pit depth. The pipe shall have perforations from the cap depth to the bottom of the pit and be of solid construction from the cap depth to the ground surface. A screw fit cap must be placed on top of the riser to allow access. 8. Where more than one vertical seepage pit is proposed for the primary or reserve system, a distribution box must be used to connect the pits. Chaining or lining the seepage pits together such that the overflow from an upstream pit flows to a downstream pit shall not be permitted. D. Design Criteria for Replacement of Existing Private Sewage Disposal Systems. Table 19.28.190.D Design Criteria for Replacement of Existing Private Sewage Disposal Systems. Septic 3 Ft A.P.* @ 5 Ft A.P.* @ 7 Ft A.P.* @ Disposal Size of Seepage Pit Tank Field 12" 24" 36" Capacity Required (Gallons) Leach Area Width x Width x Width x (Diameter x Depth) Required Length Length Length (See notes: 3, 4 & 5) Field Design at 60 Square Feet / 100 gallons Pit design at 60 Square (See notes: 1, 2, 3, & 4) Feet / 100 Qallons 1,000 600 (2) 3' x 100' (2) 5' x 55' Tx 86' 5'x 39' 6'x 32' 7'x 28' (1) 3'x 100' 1,200 720 (2) 5'x 66' (2) Tx 52' 5'x 46' 6'x 38' Tx 33' &(2)3'x70' 37 P338 1,500 900 (3)3'x100' (2)5'x82' 1 (2)7'x65' 5'x58' 6'x48' 7'x41' 2 Field Design at 90 Square Feet / 100 gallons Pit design at 90 Square Feet 1,000 900 (3)3'x100' (2)5'x90' (2)7'x64' 5'x58' 6'x48' 7'x41' 1,200 1,080 (4) Tx 90' (3) 5'x 72' (2) Tx 78' 5'x 69' 6'x 58' Tx 50' 1,500 1,350 (5)3'x90' (3)5'x90' (2)7'x97' 5'x86' 6'x72' 7'x62' Notes: *Absorption Perimeter 1. Other variations may be allowed to width and depth so as to achieve the required leach area. 2. Trenches shall not have less than 150 sq. ft of trench bottom area or be longer than 100 feet. 3. All deviations from this handout will require a percolation test with a designed septic system by a licensed Civil Engineer. 4. Depth of the seepage pit shall be measured from the bottom of the pit to the invert of the distribution pipe. 5. Multiple seepage pits may be used. If this is the case, the required depth from the table above can be divided equally among the numbers of seepage pits. In no cases the depth of seepage pits can be less than the "minimum depth" map attached. E. Design Criteria for New Private Sewage Disposal Systems. 1. Five -Foot Diameter Pits: SEEPAGE PIT DEPTH (feet) BASED ON PERCOLATION TEST RATE Perc Rate Number of Bedrooms Rate Perc Number of Bedrooms MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 17 17 17 17 18 19 31 18 22 27 31 34 38 2 17 17 17 17 18 19 j 1 32 18 23 27 31 34 38 3 17 17 17 17 18 19 33 18 23 27 31 35 39 4 17 17 17 18 19 20 34 18 23 28 31 35 39 5 17 17 18 20 20 22 35 18 23 28 32 35 39 6 17 17 19 22 22 23 36 19 24 28 32 35 39 7 17 17 20 22 24 24 37 19 24 29 32 35 39 CT P339 SEEPAGE PIT DEPTH (feet) BASED ON PERCOLATION TEST RATE Perc Rate Number of Bedrooms Number of Bedrooms Rate Perc Number of Bedrooms MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 6 MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 17 17 20 23 25 25 47 38 19 24 29 32 36 40 9 17 17 20 23 25 26 46 39 19 24 29 32 36 40 10 17 18 21 24 26 27 46 40 19 24 29 33 37 40 11 17 18 22 24 27 27 47 41 20 25 29 33 37 40 12 17 18 22 24 27 28 48 42 20 25 30 34 37 41 13 17 18 22 25 27 29 48 43 20 25 30 34 37 41 14 17 19 22 25 28 29 49 44 20 25 31 34 38 42 15 17 19 23 25 29 30 50 45 20 25 31 34 38 42 16 17 19 23 26 29 31 50 46 20 25 31 34 38 42 17 17 19 24 26 29 32 47 20 26 31 35 39 42 18 17 20 24 27 29 32 48 21 26 31 35 39 42 19 17 20 24 27 30 33 49 21 26 32 36 39 43 20 17 20 24 27 30 33 50 21 26 32 36 39 43 21 17 20 24 27 31 34 51 22 27 32 36 39 43 22 17 20 25 28 31 34 52 22 27 32 36 40 44 23 17 21 25 28 31 35 53 22 27 32 37 40 44 24 17 21 25 29 32 36 54 22 27 33 37 40 44 25 17 21 25 29 32 36 55 22 27 33 37 40 44 26 17 21 25 29 32 36 56 22 28 33 38 41 45 27 17 22 26 29 33 37 57 22 28 34 38 41 45 28 17 22 26 29 33 37 58 22 28 34 38 42 46 29 17 22 27 30 33 37 59 22 28 34 38 42 46 30 18 22 27 30 33 37 60 23 29 34 39 42 46 SEEPAGE PIT DEPTH (feet) BASED ON PERCOLATION TEST RATE Perc Rate Number of Bedrooms RatePerc Number of Bedrooms MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 61 24 29 35 39 44 47 91 43 49 55 59 62 65 62 24 30 36 40 43 46 92 44 50 56 60 63 66 63 25 31 36 41 44 46 93 45 51 57 61 64 67 64 25 31 37 41 45 47 94 46 52 58 62 65 68 65 27 32 37 42 45 48 95 47 53 59 63 66 69 66 27 32 38 43 46 48 96 48 54 60 64 67 70 67 27 33 39 43 46 49 97 49 55 61 65 68 71 68 28 34 39 44 47 50 98 50 56 61 66 69 72 69 29 34 40 45 48 50 99 51 57 62 67 70 73 39 P34O SEEPAGE PIT DEPTH (feet) BASED ON PERCOLATION TEST RATE Perc Rate Number of Bedrooms Perc Rate Rate Perc Number of Bedrooms MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 5 MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 70 29 35 41 45 48 51 17 100 52 58 63 68 71 74 71 30 36 41 46 49 52 17 101 53 59 64 69 72 75 72 31 36 42 46 50 52 17 102 54 60 65 70 73 75 73 31 37 43 47 50 53 17 103 55 61 66 71 74 76 74 32 38 43 48 51 54 104 56 61 67 72 75 77 75 32 38 44 48 52 54 105 57 62 68 73 76 78 76 33 39 45 49 52 55 106 58 63 69 74 77 79 77 34 39 45 50 53 55 107 59 64 70 75 78 80 78 34 40 46 50 54 56 108 60 65 71 75 78 81 79 35 41 46 51 54 57 109 61 66 72 76 80 82 80 36 41 47 52 55 57 110 61 67 73 77 81 83 81 36 42 48 52 55 58 111 62 68 74 78 82 84 82 37 43 48 53 56 59 112 63 69 75 79 82 85 83 38 43 49 54 57 59 113 64 70 76 80 83 86 84 38 44 50 54 57 60 114 65 71 77 81 84 87 85 39 45 50 55 58 61 115 66 72 78 82 85 88 86 39 45 51 55 59 61 116 67 73 79 83 86 89 87 40 46 52 56 59 62 117 68 74 80 84 87 90 88 41 46 52 57 60 62 118 69 75 81 85 88 91 89 41 47 53 57 61 63 119 70 76 82 86 89 92 90 42 48 54 58 61 64 120 71 77 83 87 90 93 Where: mpi = minutes per inch Conversion Factor: Example: (1 inch of drop / X MPI) x 60 minutes per hour = 6 inches/hour 2. Six -Foot Diameter Pits: SEEPAGE PIT DEPTH (feet) BASED ON PERCOLATION TEST RATE Perc Rate Number of Bedrooms Rate Perc Number of Bedrooms MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 17 17 17 17 17 17 31 17 19 22 25 28 32 2 17 17 17 17 17 17 32 1 17 19 23 25 28 32 3 17 17 17 17 17 17 33 17 19 23 26 29 32 4 17 17 17 17 17 17 34 17 19 23 26 29 32 40 P341 SEEPAGE PIT DEPTH (feet) BASED ON PERCOLATION TEST RATE Perc Rate Number of Bedrooms Rate Perc Rate Perc Number of Bedrooms MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 MPI MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 5 17 17 17 17 17 18 91 35 17 19 23 27 29 33 6 17 17 17 18 19 19 92 36 17 20 23 27 29 33 7 17 17 17 19 20 20 93 37 17 20 24 27 29 33 8 17 17 17 19 21 21 94 38 17 20 24 27 30 33 9 17 17 17 19 21 22 95 39 17 20 24 27 30 33 10 17 17 18 20 22 22 96 40 17 20 24 28 31 34 11 17 17 18 20 22 23 41 17 20 24 28 31 34 12 17 17 18 20 23 23 42 17 21 25 28 31 34 13 17 17 19 21 23 24 43 17 21 25 28 31 34 14 17 17 19 21 23 24 44 17 21 25 29 32 35 15 17 17 19 21 24 25 45 17 21 25 29 32 35 16 17 17 19 22 24 26 46 17 21 25 29 32 35 17 17 17 20 22 24 27 47 17 21 26 29 32 35 18 17 17 20 22 24 27 48 18 22 26 29 32 35 19 17 17 20 22 25 28 49 18 22 27 30 33 36 20 17 17 20 23 25 28 50 18 22 27 30 33 36 21 17 17 20 23 25 28 51 18 22 27 30 33 36 22 17 17 21 23 25 28 52 18 22 27 30 33 36 23 17 17 21 23 26 29 53 18 23 27 31 34 37 24 17 18 21 24 27 30 54 18 23 28 31 34 37 25 17 18 21 24 27 30 55 18 23 28 31 34 37 26 17 18 21 24 27 30 56 19 23 28 31 34 37 27 17 18 22 24 27 31 57 19 23 28 31 34 37 28 17 18 22 24 27 31 58 19 23 28 32 35 38 29 17 18 22 25 28 31 59 19 24 29 32 35 38 30 17 19 22 25 28 31 60 19 24 29 32 35 38 SEEPAGE PIT DEPTH (feet) BASED ON PERCOLATION TEST RATE Perc Rate Number of Bedrooms Rate Perc Number of Bedrooms MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 61 20 24 29 33 37 39 91 36 41 46 49 52 54 62 20 25 30 33 36 38 92 37 42 46 50 53 55 63 21 25 30 34 37 39 93 38 42 47 51 54 56 64 21 26 31 35 37 39 94 38 43 48 52 54 57 65 22 27 31 35 38 40 95 39 44 49 53 55 57 66 22 27 32 36 38 40 96 40 45 50 53 56 58 41 P342 SEEPAGE PIT DEPTH (feet) BASED ON PERCOLATION TEST RATE Perc Rate Number of Bedrooms Rate Perc Number of Bedrooms MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 67 23 28 32 36 39 41 97 41 46 50 54 57 59 68 23 28 33 37 39 41 98 42 46 51 55 58 60 69 24 29 33 37 40 42 99 42 47 52 56 58 61 70 24 29 34 38 40 42 100 43 48 53 57 59 61 71 25 30 35 38 41 43 101 44 49 54 57 60 62 72 25 30 35 39 41 44 102 45 50 54 58 61 63 73 26 31 36 39 42 44 103 46 50 55 59 62 64 74 27 31 36 40 42 45 104 46 51 56 60 62 64 75 27 32 37 40 43 45 105 47 52 57 61 63 65 76 28 32 37 41 44 46 106 48 53 58 61 64 66 77 28 33 38 41 44 46 107 49 54 58 62 65 67 78 29 33 38 42 45 47 108 50 54 59 63 65 67 79 29 34 39 42 45 47 109 50 55 60 64 66 68 80 30 35 39 43 46 48 110 51 56 61 64 67 69 81 30 35 40 44 46 48 111 52 57 62 65 68 70 82 31 36 40 44 47 49 112 53 58 62 66 69 71 83 31 36 41 45 47 49 113 54 58 63 67 70 72 84 32 37 41 45 48 50 114 54 59 64 68 70 72 85 32 37 42 46 48 50 115 55 60 65 68 71 73 86 33 38 42 46 49 51 116 56 61 66 69 72 74 87 33 38 43 47 49 51 117 57 62 66 70 73 75 88 34 39 44 47 50 52 118 58 62 67 71 74 76 89 35 39 44 48 50 53 119 58 63 68 72 74 76 90 35 40 45 49 51 53 120 59 1 64 69 1 73 75 77 Seven -Foot Diameter Pits: SEEPAGE PIT DEPTH (feet) BASED ON PERCOLATION TEST RATE Perc Rate Number of Bedrooms Rate Perc Number of Bedrooms MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 17 17 17 17 17 17 31 17 17 19 22 24 27 2 17 17 17 17 17 17 32 17 17 20 22 24 27 3 17 17 17 17 17 17 33 17 17 20 22 25 28 4 17 17 17 17 17 17 34 17 17 20 22 25 28 5 17 17 17 17 17 17 35 17 17 20 28 6 17 17 17 17 17 17 36 17 17 20 MV28 42 P343 SEEPAGE PIT DEPTH feet BASED ON PERCOLATION TEST RATE Perc Rate Number of Bedrooms Rate Perc Number of Bedrooms MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 17 17 17 17 17 17 37 17 17 20 23 25 28 8 17 17 17 17 18 18 38 17 17 20 23 26 28 9 17 17 17 17 18 19 39 17 17 21 23 26 28 10 17 17 17 17 19 19 40 17 17 21 24 26 29 11 17 17 17 17 19 20 41 17 18 21 24 26 29 12 17 17 17 17 20 20 42 17 18 21 24 27 29 13 17 17 17 18 20 20 43 17 18 21 24 27 29 14 17 17 17 18 20 21 44 17 18 2225 47 27 30 15 17 17 17 18 20 21 45 17 18 22 25 27 30 16 17 17 17 19 20 22 46 17 18 22 25 27 30 17 17 17 17 19 21 23 47 17 18 22 25 28 30 18 17 17 17 19 21 23 48 17 19 22 25 28 30 19 17 17 17 19 21 24 49 17 19 23 25 28 31 20 17 17 17 20 21 24 50 17 19 23 25 28 31 21 17 17 17 20 22 24 51 17 19 23 25 28 31 22 17 17 18 20 22 24 52 17 19 23 26 28 31 23 17 17 18 20 22 25 53 17 19 23 26 29 32 24 17 17 18 20 23 25 54 17 20 24 26 29 32 25 17 17 18 20 23 25 55 17 20 24 26 29 32 26 17 17 18 20 23 26 56 17 20 24 27 29 32 27 17 17 19 21 23 26 57 17 20 24 27 29 32 28 17 17 19 21 23 26 58 17 20 24 27 30 33 29 17 17 19 21 24 27 59 17 20 25 27 30 33 30 17 17 19 21 24 27 60 17 20 25 28 30 33 SEEPAGE PIT DEPTH (feet) BASED ON PERCOLATION TEST RATE Perc Rate Number of Bedrooms Rate Perc Number of Bedrooms MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 61 17 21 25 28 31 34 91 31 35 39 42 45 46 62 17 21 25 29 31 33 92 32 36 40 43 45 47 63 18 22 26 29 31 33 93 32 36 40 44 46 48 64 18 22 26 30 32 34 94 33 37 41 44 47 48 65 19 23 26 30 32 34 95 34 38 42 45 47 49 66 19 23 27 30 33 35 96 34 38 43 46 48 50 67 20 24 28 31 33 35 97 35 39 43 46 49 51 68 20 24 28 31 34 35 98 36 40 44 47 49 51 993 P344 SEEPAGE PIT DEPTH (feet) BASED ON PERCOLATION TEST RATE Perc Rate Number of Bedrooms Rate Perc Number of Bedrooms MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 69 20 25 29 32 34 36 99 36 40 45 48 50 52 70 21 25 29 32 35 36 100 37 41 45 48 51 53 71 21 25 30 33 35 37 101 38 42 46 49 51 53 72 22 26 30 33 35 37 102 38 43 47 50 52 54 73 22 26 30 34 36 38 103 39 43 47 51 53 55 74 23 27 31 34 36 38 104 40 44 48 51 53 55 75 23 27 31 35 37 39 105 40 45 49 52 54 56 76 24 28 32 35 37 39 106 41 45 49 53 55 57 77 24 28 32 35 38 40 107 42 46 50 53 56 57 78 25 29 33 36 38 40 108 43 47 51 54 56 58 79 25 29 33 36 39 40 109 43 47 51 55 57 59 80 25 30 34 37 39 41 110 44 48 52 55 58 59 81 26 30 34 37 40 41 111 45 49 53 56 58 60 82 26 30 35 38 40 42 112 45 49 53 57 59 61 83 27 31 35 38 40 42 113 46 50 54 57 60 61 84 27 31 35 39 41 43 114 47 51 55 58 60 62 85 28 32 36 39 41 43 115 47 51 56 59 61 63 86 28 32 36 40 42 44 116 48 52 56 59 62 63 87 29 33 37 40 42 44 117 49 53 57 60 62 64 88 29 33 37 40 43 45 118 49 53 58 61 63 65 89 30 34 38 41 43 45 119 50 54 58 61 63 66 90 30 34 38 42 44 46 120 51 55 59 62 65 66 19.28.200 Horizontal Seepage Pit Systems. The use of the horizontal seepage pit systems is permitted only where adequate area does not exist for a leach line system. All horizontal seepage pit systems shall comply with the design and construction requirements provided in this section. A. Percolation Test Procedures for Horizontal Seepage Pit Systems. All percolation tests shall be performed in accordance with the test procedures found in 19.28.160 (Groundwater and Percolation Testing Requirements). In addition to the requirements of Section 19.28.160, percolation tests for horizontal seepage pits must also comply with the following additional requirements: 1. The average percolation rates shall not exceed 30 minutes per inch in any portion of the horizontal seepage pit. 44 P345 Individual rates exceeding 30 minutes per inch may be considered with additional soil testing. 2. At least 4 percolation test holes at each pit location should be provided to represent soil types within the infiltrative surface area of the seepage pit. This profile should represent the entire sidewall depth of the pit. 3. At least 1 deep boring should extend to a depth of at least 10 feet below the bottom of the seepage pit, or to impermeable material. In no case shall less than 5 feet of unsaturated permeable soil exist below the bottom of the seepage pit. 4. Backhoe excavations may be required to demonstrate uniformity of soil throughout the seepage pit. This would be necessary when the pit is proposed in an area of variable soil conditions. 5. Any percolation tests for horizontal seepage pits, which were approved based on testing prior to the effective date of this section, will require additional percolation testing unless the previous testing meets current requirements. B. Dimensions and Construction Requirements. 1. Horizontal seepage pits are to be installed according to the qualified professional's specifications for location, length, width, and depth. 2. Horizontal seepage pits must be spaced 20 feet apart measured edge to edge. 3. Primary and reserve horizontal seepage pits cannot be combined in one common pit. 4. The pit excavation must be at least 4 feet in width, but not greater than 6 feet in width. 5. The top of the infiltrative surface shall be at least 2 feet below the natural grade but no more than 5 feet. This depth is also known as the cap depth. Additional soil can be placed over the top of the installed horizontal seepage pit at the discretion of the qualified professional. 6. The sidewall depth below the cap shall be at least 6 feet but cannot exceed 7 feet. 45 P346 7. The pit excavations may arc or bend under the following conditions: (i) The maximum deflection cannot exceed a total of 45 degrees in any direction without increasing the pit length to compensate for loss of sidewall area; (ii) Bends or arcs totaling greater than 45 degrees may be accepted on a case-by-case basis. A correction factor will be required, increasing the total length, due to sidewall loss; and (iii) U- shaped and H-shaped bends will not be accepted. 8. The maximum slope for the use of horizontal seepage pits is 25% (4:1). Exceptions to this slope limit may be considered up to 50% (2:1), on a case-by-case basis, where the soil and slope are uniform, extending 100 feet beyond the seepage pit. Additional testing, and design detail shall be required to address the risk of effluent surfacing on the slope recognizable as sewage as well as slope stability issues. Slopes that exceed 25% (4:1) will, in most cases, require a terrace design. Any grading to create terraces should be in accordance with any permit requirements for brushing, clearing, and grading from any other agency. 9. The use of concrete pit liners is allowed. If used, the concrete pit liners shall meet the testing standards established by the International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials (IAPMO). 10. All pits must be filled with clean leach line rock to the cap depth of the horizontal pit liner. The rock should be graded at 1 to 1.5 inches in size and shall be covered with straw, untreated building paper or a geotextile fabric prior to backfill to prevent the infiltration of soil into the rock. 11. A manifold system constructed of 4 inch loop of Schedule 40 perforated pipe shall be installed in the pit to allow for distribution of the effluent throughout the entire pit. The manifold shall be placed 1 foot from the sidewall of the horizontal seepage pit and shall run the length and width of the pit in a rectangular pattern. 12. Where more than one horizontal seepage pit is proposed for the primary or reserve system, a distribution box must be used to connect the pits. 13. A hybrid system combining a horizontal seepage pit for the primary or reserve design, and leach lines for the other system is allowed. However, a combination of the two types of systems, used for a single primary or reserve design, will P347 not be considered. The system design identified as the most difficult installation shall be installed as the primary system. This is to be based on access, grading, or other obstacles to install the system once the house is constructed. 14. The California Occupational Health and Safety Act (COHSA) requires shoring for excavations exceeding 5 feet when persons will be working in them. All work done installing horizontal seepage pits must comply with COHSA for the purpose of construction and inspection. C. Horizontal Seepage Pit Sizing Calculations. The calculations for sizing a horizontal seepage pit are done to provide an equivalent amount of sidewall area in the seepage pit as found in a standard 3 foot deep leach line trench using the same percolation rate. Seepage Pit Length = (31-1- — 2wd)/ 2d Where: 3 = sq. ft. of absorptive sidewall area per lineal foot of 3 foot deep leach line trench LL = leach line length as a function of percolation rate w = seepage pit width d = seepage pit sidewall depth below cap 19.28.210 Alternative onsite wastewater treatment systems; Use of alternative systems. Alternative onsite wastewater treatment systems and sewage holding tanks may only be used with prior approval of the Director of Building and Safety Services prior to submittal of plans for permitting purposes. Owners of alternative treatment systems located within the City must: A. Maintain an operating permit; B. Ensure the alternative treatment system is inspected annually; and C. Submit quarterly water samples during the first year of use. 19.28.220 Alternate onsite wastewater treatment systems siting and operational requirements; Variances permissible. A. Property owners may apply to Building and Safety Services to establish alternative OWTS siting and operational requirements where it is determined by Building and Safety Services that 47 P348 alternative requirements will provide equivalent level of environmental protection. B. Variances will not be granted in the following circumstances: 1. Where the proposed OWTS presents a substantial likelihood of discharging sewage, impure waters, or any matter or substance offensive, injurious, or dangerous to health so as to cause any of the following to occur: i. Sewage, impure waters, or any matter or substance offensive, injurious, or dangerous to health to empty, flow, seep, or drain onto the surface of any land. ii. Sewage, impure waters, or any matter or substance offensive, injurious, or dangerous to health to empty, flow, seep, drain into, or affect any well, spring, stream, river, lake, or other waters. iii. Result in any condition which is unsafe, dangerous, or creates a nuisance. 2. Above surface discharge. Variances will not be granted for any OWTS which utilizes any form of effluent disposal discharging on, or above, the post installation ground surface; this includes, but is not limited to sprinklers, exposed drip lines, free -surface wetlands, and ponds. 3. Sewer availability. Variances will not be granted for any OWTS where there is a public sewer available. Building and Safety Services Department may require a "Will or Will Not Serve" letter Cucamonga Valley Water District with each new or replacement OWTS proposal to evaluate the proximity and availability of community systems to the proposed OWTS site. This will ensure septic systems are only installed in areas where a sewer is unavailable. The "Will or Will Not Serve" letter must include the following: (i) Parcel number for the property where the OWTS is being proposed; (ii) Distance to the nearest available sewer line; and (iii) Whether or not the sewering entity will provide service to the parcel. The 'Will or Will Not Serve" letter must be completed and signed by the appropriate official representing the sewering entity and be filed with the Building and Safety Services Department prior to submittal of the percolation report/plot plan, or upon request once the percolation report/plot plan has been submitted. M. P349 4. Sewer Requirement. Connection to a public sewer system is required within established sewer service districts and outside such districts wher Developments must connect nearest property line is within requirement will be increased unit within the development. required by the RWQCB. to a sewer system when the 200 feet of a sewer line. This by 100 feet for each dwelling 5. Ground Slope. Variances will not be granted for slopes greater than a 30% incline without a slope stability report approved by a Qualified Professional. Refer to Natural Ground Slope for more information regarding natural ground slope requirements. 6. Leaching Areas. As referenced in the current adopted California Plumbing Code, Appendix H —Private Sewage Disposal Systems — Section H 301.1 Leaching Chambers that comply with IAPMO PS 63 and bundled expanded polystyrene synthetic aggregate units that comply with IAPMO IGC 276 shall be sized using the required area calculated using Table H 201.1(3) with a 0.70 multiplier. 7. Supplemental Treatment. OWTS utilizing supplemental treatment require periodic monitoring or inspections. No variances will be granted for supplemental treatments that are unable to meet this requirement. 8. Depth to Groundwater. No variance will be granted for OWTS with a depth from the bottom of the dispersal system to groundwater less than 5 feet. The exception to this will be for seepage pits which shall have a separation no less than 10 feet. 9. Recreational Vehicle (RV) Holding Tanks. No variances will be granted for OWTS dedicated to receiving significant amounts of wastes, which are dumped from RV holding tanks. 10. Class V Injection Wells. United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) requirements apply to underground injections control systems for OWTS. Subsurface disposal systems including leach fields and seepage pits shall comply with USEPA Underground Injection Control requirements when classified as a Class V injection well. Subsurface disposal systems with at least one of the following characteristics are classified as Class V wells: (i) The system has the capacity to serve 20 or more G&'] P350 persons per day; (ii) The system receives wastewater other than domestic wastewater such as that generated by manufacturing, chemical processing, industrial fluid disposal, automotive repair, or recycling; or (iii) The system receives sewage containing biological agents (such as wastewater from recreational vehicles or portable toilets). Disposal systems that are classified as Class V wells must be registered with USEPA. 19.28.230 Sewer wells; cesspools; seepage pits. Except those permitted pursuant to a valid OWTS permit issued in conformance with the requirements of this chapter, all sewer wells, cesspools, seepage pits, and similar excavations are hereby declared a public nuisance and are prohibited. 19.28.240 Holding tanks. A. All holding tanks are hereby declared a public nuisance and are prohibited. Exception to this prohibition may be granted by the Director of Building and Safety Services: 1. If it is necessary to use a holding tank to abate a nuisance or health hazard caused by a failing OWTS; or 2. For a publicly -owned nonresidential facility necessary for the public health, safety or welfare, where installation of an OWTS is not feasible and a holding tank is determined by the Director of Building and Safety Services to provide the safest and most acceptable method of sewage disposal. B. Where exceptions are granted and holding tank(s) approved, an operating permit issued by the director will be required, which will provide for approval of the tank pumper, maintenance schedule, tank/sewage level monitoring, and reporting requirements. 19.28.250 OWTS failures; Corrective actions required. A. All OWTS failures resulting in effluent surfacing, wastewater surface discharge, or wastewater back-up into plumbing fixtures, shall be reported immediately to Building and Safety Services, upon discovery. B. Building and Safety Services or other designated City departments will complete an investigation within 24 hours to determine the validity of the complaint or other notification of a failing OWTS. Ac P351 C. Any OWTS that is found to be failing shall have a notice of violation issued to the property owner requiring action to eliminate the immediate health hazard through pumping of the septic tank by a licensed sewage hauler or elimination of wastewater flows to the failing OWTS. The notice of violation will also require a repair to be completed to the OWTS as needed within a reasonable time frame. D. The proposed repair shall be evaluated by Building and Safety Services to ensure it meets the minimum design requirements of this chapter or is in substantial conformance to the greatest extent practicable. E. Groundwater separation requirements to the bottom of the dispersal system and the highest anticipated groundwater level for repairs shall be as follows: (i) 5 foot for conventional OWTS; (ii) 2 foot for alternative OWTS with supplemental treatment; and (iii) Less than 2 foot separation cannot be allowed through this LAMP and will require a waste discharge permit through the RWQCB. F. The repair shall be completed under permit and inspection by Building and Safety Services. G. Failure to complete the required corrective action within the time frames given will result in additional enforcement action which may include condemnation of the structure for immediate health hazards. 19.28.260 Substandard systems. All OWTS within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that do not meet the minimum design requirements of this Chapter shall be deemed substandard. Sites with substandard OWTS shall be prohibited from having future additions or modifications to the property that would potentially increase wastewater flow to the OWTS or decrease the amount of usable area available for the OWTS. 19.28.270 Abandoned onsite wastewater treatment systems. A. All abandoned OWTS shall be disposed of in accordance with this section. An OWTS Abandonment Permit must be obtained prior to the removal or disposal of any abandoned OWTS. For the purposes of this section, an OWTS shall be considered abandoned if it has been out of service for more than three consecutive months. B. Every OWTS that has been abandoned or has been discontinued from further use or to which no waste or waste discharge pipe from a plumbing fixture is connected must have all remaining sewage 51 P352 removed from, and disposed of by a qualified waste hauler and transported to a dispersal facility that operates in compliance with valid permit issued by a Regional Water Quality Control Board. C. Upon removal of all remaining sewage, the tank top and bottom must be crushed, backfilled and compacted with material approved by the director or be removed and disposed of in an approved manner. D. Completion of the above-described work shall require that the property owner obtain a septic tank abandonment permit from the director. 19.28.280 Abatement. To the extent possible, failing OWTS must be brought into compliance with this Code. In case of any failure, malfunction or breakdown of any OWTS, if not corrected within a time designated by the Director, the Director may order or cause corrections to be made and bill the property owner for the costs and may place a lien on the property for the abatement costs. The Director may also order the premises to be vacated if no safe manner of abatement is possible. 19.28.290 Notice of violation. The Director may provide a notice of intent to record a notice of violation to the owner of property upon which a failing or substandard OWTS exists. Notice will be provided to the property owner by mail at the address shown on the latest assessment roll or at any other address of the owner known to the director. The notice will also be posted on the property. The notice will state that within 15 days of the date of the notice, the property owner may request a meeting with the Director to present evidence that a violation does not exist. If, within 15 days of the date of the notice, the property owner does not request a meeting and the violation has not been corrected, or if, after considering the evidence presented by the property owner at the meeting, the Director determines that a code violation in fact exists, the Director may record a notice of violation in the office of the County Recorder. Upon recording the notice, the Director will notify the owner of the action. The notice is to inform all parties that no improvements, including building additions, can be approved while the failing or substandard OWTS continues in operation. At the request of any affected property owner and upon full payment of any fees established by resolution of the city council for recovery of associated enforcement costs and payment of any fee for the recordation of the notice of violation, the Director will issue a notice of expungement of 52 violation upon proof to the director that the noticed violation has been remedied. The notice of expungement may be recorded by the property owner at his or her expense. 19.28.300 Appeal from denial, revocation or suspension. A. Any person aggrieved by any decision of the Director with respect to the issuance or refusal to issue a OWTS permit may, within ten days of the date of the decision, appeal the decision to the city manager, or his or her designee, by filing a written notice of appeal with the city manager. B. The city manager, or his or her designee, shall thereupon fix a time and place for hearing such appeal within 30 days of the date of said decision. The aggrieved party shall be given notice of the time and place of the hearing by serving the notice personally or by depositing it in the United States Post Office in the city, certified mail, addressed to the aggrieved party at his or her last known address. C. The city manager, or his or her designee, shall have the authority to determine all questions raised on such appeal during the hearing. No such determination shall conflict with any substantive provision of this chapter. D. Following such hearing, the city manager, or his or her designee, may reverse, modify, or affirm the decision of the director with respect to the issuance or refusal to issue a license. The city manager shall render a decision within a reasonable period of time not to exceed 60 days of the conclusion of the hearing. The decision of the city manager, or his or her designee, shall be final. SECTION 3. The City Council declares that, should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence, or word of this Ordinance be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences, and words of this Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. 2017. SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify as to the adoption of this Ordinance. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of , 53 Dennis Michael Mayor P353 I, JANICE REYNOLDS, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the day of , 2017, and was finally passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the day of 2017, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEMBERS: ATTEST: Janice Reynolds City Clerk P354 °i 1 tl ._. '! . _' _ 7 F 1�- t .•� '1 7 � t ►_� I � F � _ } _ j 1 J f W�m MV NIfMf+etl Mr wrmwr. i l Mr uMnl _ S 7 I T' Mrarll 7 I I ✓� �J I MV P. t f .p! .71 `.! � tom•• - - 1 — _...: ! ! —'1 � ' : __.. - -•1 3 t _ --.. __�, � �i�: � � �, 7 ; • ; j 1 _ 1 ATTACHMENT 2 P356 REPORT DATE: July 19, 2017 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager c 04 INITIATED BY: Candyce Burnett, City Planner's Jennifer Nakamura, Associate Planner SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO CONDUCT SECOND READING AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 912 AMENDING THE MUNICIPAL CODE TO ENACT REQUIREMENTS AND STANDARDS FOR CREATIVE PLACEMAKING THROUGH PUBLIC ART RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council conduct the second reading and adoption of Ordinance No. 912, amending the Municipal Code to establish requirements and standards for creative placemaking through public art. BACKGROUND: In 2010 the City's General Plan was updated to reflect updated goals and priorities for the community. Public art is identified in the General Plan as an important amenity in the public setting which can create linkages between projects, beautifying public spaces and buildings and increasing the intrinsic and monetary values of the places where art is located. Land Use Goal LU -14 in the General Plan identifies the need to support public art as an important amenity of a beautiful City. Policy LU14-3 specifies the desire to create a public art ordinance within the Development Code. In January, 2015 at the City Council goal -setting session, Council selected the development of a public art ordinance as a Council goal. On June 21, 2017 staff presented Ordinance No. 912 to enact standards and requirements for creative placemaking through public art. At the conclusion of the public hearing, the City Council conducted the first reading of the Ordinance. ANALYSIS: The goal of the proposed ordinance is to foster the development of creative placemaking within public spaces to encourage better community. Art is a tool to draw people to these public spaces for dialogue, education and enjoyment, community problem solving. enhancement of the physical environment and celebration of public space. Upon approval, the ordinance will become effective August 18, 2017. Projects submitted, but not deemed complete for processing prior to this date will be subject to these requirements. Projects that have been deemed complete and are preparing for committees or hearings as of this date are exempt from the requirements of this ordinance. Page 1 of 2 SECOND READING AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 912 JULY 19, 2017 FISCAL IMPACT: The development of a public art program is expected to increase City expenses in staff time and resources to include review of public art on private and City developments. Fees collected by developments choosing the in -lieu option will be used to fund art installations within publicly owned property. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This item addresses City Council Goal(s): This meets General Plan Land Use Goal LU -14: Support public art as an important amenity of a beautiful City. It also meets City Council Goal A11 to develop a public art ordinance and funding mechanism to support art within publicly accessible spaces. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 — Ordinance No. 912 (Second Reading) Page 2 of 2 P357 ORDINANCE NO. 912 ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA AMENDING THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING CREATIVE PLACEMAKING AND PUBLIC ART A. Recitals. P358 1. Placemaking and public art enhances the quality of life for individuals living in, working in, and visiting Rancho Cucamonga by enhancing the physical beauty of the community; providing gathering places for residents who live in the community; encouraging the development and appreciation of art; and enhancing the quality of development projects and the image of the community. 2. This Ordinance will promote the general welfare by encouraging pride in the community, build vibrant and distinctive spaces through placemaking, increasing property values, enhancing the quality of life through artistic opportunities, uniting the community through shared cultural experiences, and creating a cultural legacy for future generations through the collection and exhibition of high-quality art in unique public spaces which reflects diverse styles that will acknowledge the past, usher in the future and create programs and activities that will further these goals. 3. On May 24, 2017, the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a duly notice public hearing regarding this Ordinance, and thereafter adopted Planning Commission Resolution 17-48 setting forth its recommendation regarding this Ordinance. 4. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The City Council finds that the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. SECTION 2. The City Council finds further based the facts found to be true and correct in the preceding Section 1 and substantial evidence presented during its public hearing on this Ordinance as follows: 1. This Ordinance is consistent with the City's General Plan. This Ordinance meets General Plan Land Use Goal LU -14 by supporting public art as an important amenity of a beautiful City. This Ordinance also meets City Council Goal A11 by developing a public art ordinance and funding mechanism to support art within publicly accessible spaces. ATTACHMENT 1 P359 2. Adoption of this Ordinance is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") pursuant to Title 14, Chapter 3, California Code of Regulations (CEQA Guidelines), Section 15061(b)(3) because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that this Ordinance will have a significant effect on the environment. This Ordinance does not propose any physical change to the environment itself, but instead revises existing land use regulations to require certain development projects that require discretionary review to include publicly accessible art and creates a process for administering a public art program. Pursuant to CEQA, the City will review the potential significant impacts of all development applications that are subject to the public art requirement and any discretionary action by the City to install public art pursuant to this Ordinance. Therefore, this Ordinance will not have a significant effect on the environment. SECTION 3. A new Chapter 2.26, entitled "Public Art Committee," is hereby added to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to read as follows: "Chapter 2.26 - Public Art Committee 2.26.010 Public Art Committee. A. There is established a Public Art Committee to advise the Council regarding the selection, purchase, placement, and maintenance of art installed by the City or on City property, and expenditures from the City of Rancho Cucamonga Public Art Trust Fund. B. The Public Art Committee shall consist of five members appointed by the Council as follows: (i) one member of the Planning Commission; (ii) one member of the Parks and Recreation Commission; (iii) one member of the Community and Arts Foundation; and (iv) two members of the public to be appointed based on relevant work experience, trade, industry, or expertise. C. The City Council shall prescribe by resolution the duties, terms of service, qualifications, and compensation of committee members. D. The City Manager or his or her designee shall assist the Public Art Committee in fulfilling its duties. 2.26.020 Meetings. Regular meetings of the Public Art Committee shall be held at such time and place as is determined by resolution of the City Council." P360 SECTION 4. A new Chapter 3.72, entitled "Public Art Trust Fund," is hereby added to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to read as follows: "Chapter 3.72 - Public Art Trust Fund 3.72.010 Creation of Public Art Trust Fund. There is hereby created a special fund to be known as the "City of Rancho Cucamonga Public Art Trust Fund." 3.72.020. Use of Funds A. All money received by the City from endowments or gifts to the City of Rancho Cucamonga designated for the arts or pursuant to Section 17.124.020.D.2 shall be placed in the Public Art Trust Fund. All money shall be deposited, invested, accounted for, and expended as follows: The City of Rancho Cucamonga Public Art Trust Fund shall only be utilized for the following purposes: a. The design, acquisition, installation, improvement, maintenance, and insurance of public art work displayed by the City or on City property. b. Art education programs for the community conducted on City property; provided, that not more than five (5%) percent of the fund's annual budget shall be used for this purpose. C. Administrative costs reasonably related to either of the preceding purposes. 2. Money deposited in the Public Art Trust Fund shall be held in a manner to avoid any commingling with other revenues and funds of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, except for temporary investments, and all funds shall be expended solely for the purposes for which they were collected. Any interest income earned by the money in the Public Art Trust Fund shall be deposited in the Public Art Trust Fund and shall be expended only for the purpose for which the money was originally collected. B. The City Council shall establish procedures for selecting art work to be purchased using funds found in the Public Art Trust Fund, which may include but shall not be limited to the following: (1) open competition; (2) limited competition; (3) invitation; (4) direct purchase; (5) donation; or (6) any combination of the above. P361 3.72.030 Return of Fees Paid In Lieu of Providing Public Art. A. A project developer or its successor, may submit a written request to the City for the return of any fees paid pursuant to Section 17.124.020.D.2 in lieu of providing public art work that are not committed within ten years of payment, together will all interest earned thereon. The request shall be verified and shall include the date of payment; the amount paid and method of payment; the location of the development project for which the fee was paid; and a statement that the project developer or its successor is the payer of the fees and/or the current owner of the development project. B. The City Council shall review the request and determine if return of the then uncommitted portion of the fees and interest is appropriate and, if so, the method of refund. No refund shall be appropriate if the City Council determines that the fee is still needed for the purposes of the Public Art Trust Fund." SECTION 5. A new Chapter 17.124, entitled "Design Provisions for Public Art," is hereby added to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to read as follows: "Chapter 17.124 - Design Provisions for Public Art 17.124.010 Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to promote the general welfare and enhance the quality of life for City residents, workers, and visitors by improved public placemaking which will require certain developments to include or provide for public art or architecture that qualifies as art. 17.124.020 Public Art Required. A. The requirements of this chapter shall apply to any development subject to site development review, minor design review, or design review that meets one or both of the following criteria: All residential development projects that propose to develop four (4) or more dwelling units. 2. All commercial, office, or industrial development projects with a project valuation or valuations exceeding one million dollars ($1,000,000) in the aggregate, based on most recent International Code Council building valuation data. B. Notwithstanding anything else in this section, the requirements of this chapter shall not apply to: P362 1. Residential projects with a density equal to or less than 4 dwelling units per acre. 2. Residential projects that contain income restricted affordable housing units where the value of the restricted unit(s) equals or exceeds the minimum value of the art work that would otherwise be required. 3. Remodeling, addition to, or both of existing residential buildings or accessory structures. 4. Remodeling of existing commercial, office, or industrial buildings that do not include any exterior modifications to the building. 5. Remodeling, addition to, or both of existing commercial, office, or industrial buildings for which art work was previously installed, donated, or for which an in lieu fee was paid pursuant to the requirements of this Chapter, regardless of whether such remodeling, addition to, or both includes interior modifications, exterior modifications, or both. 6. Public school facilities. 7. Places of worship. 8. Reconstruction of buildings that have been damaged by fire, flood, wind, earthquake, or other natural disaster, where the reconstructed buildings are substantially similar to the original buildings. 9. Wireless Communication Facilities. C. All development projects subject to this chapter must include art work that has a minimum value that meets or exceeds an amount equal to the sum of: $750 per residential unit developed: and $1 per square foot of commercial, office, or industrial development. D. In lieu of providing the art required by the preceding paragraph C, the applicant may do either of the following: 1. Donate to the City art work that meets or exceeds the minimum value of the art work; subject to the provisions of section 17.124.030 below. 2. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, pay on a per unit basis, an in -lieu fee into the City's Public Art Trust Fund, equal P363 to the minimum value of the art work that would otherwise be included in the development project. E. No final approval, such as a final inspection or a certificate of occupancy, for any development project subject to this chapter shall be granted or issued unless and until the requirements of this chapter have been met. For purposes of this requirement, compliance shall be measured in light of the conditions of approval for the project, including but not limited to any approved phased development plan. In furtherance of any phasing plan or project completion schedule, the City may accept bonds or other surety to assist in the completion of the project, provided they are in a form and manner acceptable to the Planning Director and City Attorney. 17.124.030 Donated Art Work A. Art work donated to the City pursuant to this chapter must meet the design standards in section 17.124.040 of this chapter and shall be subject to the final approval and acceptance by the City Council, upon recommendation of the Public Art Committee. Upon final acceptance by the City Council, the donated art work shall be the sole property of the City. B. If a developer elects to donate art work to the City in lieu of providing art work as required by section 17.124.020.C, the donation shall be secured by a cash deposit in an amount that meets or exceeds the required minimum value of the art work or a performance bond for the same amount and in a form approved by the City Attorney. The security, regardless of the form, shall become payable to the City and deposited into the City's Public Art Trust Fund in the event the developer fails to donate art work acceptable to the City as required by this chapter. 17.124.040 Public Art Design Standards A. For purposes of this chapter, "art work" means original or limited edition artistic creations, and may include, but is not limited to, sculptures, paintings, monuments, water features, glasswork, lighting, ceramics and in exceptional circumstances, landscaping elements. B. Media may include but are not be limited to, steel, bronze, wood, stone, tile, concrete, lighting, any other durable materials able to withstand outdoor conditions, or any combination of these, including in exceptional circumstances, plant materials. For these purposes, "durable" means lasting, enduring and highly resistant to deterioration due to weather or the passage of time. P364 C. Art work must be of a scale and setting as to complement the adjacent physical building, improvements, and property. D. Art work must be installed in a public place, which means any exterior area on public or private property that is easily accessible to the general public or clearly visible to the general public from adjacent public property, such as a street or other public thoroughfare or sidewalk. E. Art work must be accompanied by a plaque identifying the name of the art work, the artist(s), and the date of installation. The plaque must be installed in close proximity to the art work. F. Art work installed on private property shall qualify towards the minimum landscaping requirements of Chapter 17.56. G. Art work may be combined with functional elements of the development project (such as bike racks, shade structures, bus shelters, trash receptacles) only if, when the elements are viewed as a whole, the expressive design elements predominate over utilitarian concerns. H. The following shall not count towards meeting the public art requirement of this chapter: 1. Landscaping, unless substantially comprised of durable elements that otherwise qualify as art work. 2. Mass-produced or "off the shelf' decorative or ornamental items. 3. Historical or memorial markers or statuary. Art work must meet the minimum required valuation for the project. 1. The project developer may claim the following expenses in satisfaction of the minimum value of the required art work: a. Artist's fees; b. Art materials; C. Fabrication or manufacturing of the art work; d. Transportation of the art work; e. Base, mounting, or pedestal for the art work; f. Building permits for installation of the art work; P365 g. Identification plaque for the art work; h. Lighting instruments specifically lighting the art work; i. Installation of the art work; j. Structural engineering for the art work; k. Motors or subterranean equipment directly necessary for the installation of the art work; I. Water related costs for the art that includes artist designed water features not to exceed thirty (30%) percent of the total value of the art work; M. Art consultant fees (if applicable) not to exceed a maximum of fifteen (15%) percent of the value of the artwork; and n. Any fees paid to public art experts (such as art conservators, qualified appraisers, etc.) that are required by the City. 2, The following expenses shall not be counted toward the minimum value of the required art work: a. Expenses related to locating the artist, including but not limited to, airfare, hotel, taxi fares and other travel related expenses; b. Architect, landscape architect, or other design professional fees; C. Site preparation for public art installation, including but not limited to grading, demolition or removal of items or structures and installation of utilities to the site; d. Landscaping surrounding the art; e. Items around the public art that is not conceptualized, designed, and fabricated by the selected artist; f. Utility fees associated with activating electronic or water generated art; g. Lighting elements not integral to the illumination of the art; P366 h. Publicity, public relations, photographs, educational materials, business letterhead or logos bearing the sculpture's image; or i. Dedication ceremonies, including art unveilings or grand openings. J. Architecture and/or Landscape Architecture may be considered art work on a case-by-case basis based on factors that may include, but shall not be limited to: 1. Whether the architect/landscape architect is recognized by the professional or artistic community as demonstrated by a substantial record of artistic recognition in shows, museums, professional or industry awards or publications. 2. Whether, when the building or landscape architecture is viewed as a whole, the expressive architectural design elements predominate over utilitarian concerns. 3. Whether the architecture/landscape architecture was designed in collaboration with an artist who has: (a) experience with monumental scale sculpture; (b) major design control of the portions of the architecture to be considered as art; and (3) been involved in development of the project from early on in the design process. K. Commercial signage and/or artistic lighting may be considered art work on a case-by-case basis based on factors that may include, but shall not be limited to: 1. Whether the sign or lighting is an original work, based on a unique and original design. 2. Whether the designer is recognized by the artistic community as demonstrated by a substantial record of artistic recognition in shows, museums, or publications. 3. Whether, when the sign or lighting is viewed as a whole, the expressive design elements predominate over the commercial message or utilitarian concerns. 4. Whether the sign or lighting was designed in collaboration with a designer who has: (a) experience designing signs that are unique and original; (b) substantial control over those portions of the sign to be considered as art; and (3) been involved in design of the sign from early on in the design process. P367 17.124.050 Submittals. The project developer shall submit, on a form or forms provided by the City, an application for installation of art work on private property or donation of art work to the City that contains the following information as applicable to the project in addition to any other information as may be required by the City to adequately evaluate the proposed the art work.: A. The architect, landscape architect, designer or artists' name(s), qualifications and examples of past work. B. Preliminary sketches, photographs or other documentation of sufficient descriptive clarity to indicate the nature of the proposed art work and an artist warranty as to the originality of title to the art work. C. An appraisal or other evidence of the value of the proposed art work, including acquisition and installation costs, that demonstrates satisfaction of the minimum required value of the art work. D. A written agreement executed by the artist or artists who created the art work that expressly waives all rights that may be waived under the California Art Preservation Act, the Visual Artists Rights Act, or other applicable state and federal laws. E. Preliminary plans containing such detailed information as may be required by the City to adequately evaluate the location of the art work and its compatibility with the proposed development project and/or with the character of adjacent developed parcels and the existing neighborhood. F. A written statement executed by the property owner and approved by the City Attorney that requires the landowner or his or her successors and assigns to defend, indemnify, and hold the City harmless against any liability, loss, damage, costs or expenses (including reasonable attorneys' fees and court costs) arising from any claim, action or liability related to the art work. G. If the project developer proposes to satisfy the public art requirement with architecture, it must before its application can be deemed complete submit to the approving authority at a pre -application review: (a) a maquette and other materials that satisfactorily illustrate the proposed conceptual development; and (b) a statement explaining why the architecture should be considered an art work, including but not limited to an explanation of the ideas, meaning, cultural significance, or conceptual complexity expressed in the architecture. Nothing in this paragraph shall be deemed to require the reviewing authority's approval of the submittal at the pre - application review before the application is deemed complete. P368 17.124.060 Applications to Donate Art Work to the City Applications for art work donated to the City shall be subject to additional review by the Public Art Committee, which shall make a recommendation to the City Council regarding whether the proposed donation is consistent with the purposes of this chapter. 17.124.070 Ownership and Maintenance of Art Work Placed on Private Property. A. All art work installed pursuant to this chapter on the site of a development project shall remain the property of the owner of the site for which the final building permit or certificate of occupancy related to the development project was obtained and the owner's successors and assigns, which owner must provide all maintenance necessary to preserve and maintain the art work in good condition and in the manner approved by the City. B. The obligation to maintain the art work shall be enforced as follows: 1. Prior to the installation of the art work on a development project, the property owner shall record a document with the county recorder setting forth a description of the art work and acknowledging the obligation of the property owner to repair and maintain it. This document and the underlying covenant shall run with the land and provide notice to future property owners of the obligation to repair and maintain the art work and of certain limitations related to any federal, state or local laws governing the rights of the artists including but not limited to rights regarding the alteration, modification or relocation of subject art work. The City shall be a signatory party to this document, and its final form and content shall be approved by the City Attorney. 2. The obligation to maintain the art work shall include, without limitation, preserving the art work in good condition to the satisfaction of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, protecting, repairing, restoring, or replacing the art work in the event of physical defacement, mutilation, alteration or destruction, and securing and maintaining insurance coverage in an amount to be approved by the City for: (a) fire; (b) flood, wind, earthquake, or other natural disaster; (b) vandalism; and (c) extended liability. 3. Any time the City determines that art work has not been maintained in substantial conformity with the manner in which P369 it was originally approved, the City shall require the current property owner to either: a. Maintain, repair, restore, or replace the art work; or b. After reasonable notice: (i) pay the lesser of either the costs estimated by the City to be required to maintain, repair, restore, or replace the art work and/or secure and maintain insurance for the art work; and (ii) provide the City or its representatives reasonable access to the property to perform any necessary to maintain, repair, restore, or replace the art work. C. If an owner wishes to replace art work required by this chapter for any reason, including but not limited to theft, destruction, removal, or personal preference, the replacement art work shall be subject to the review and approval of the original approving authority, which shall determine whether the replacement art work meets the criteria set forth in this chapter." SECTION 6. The City Council declares that, should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence, or word of this Ordinance be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences, and words of this Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. 2017. SECTION 7. The City Clerk shall certify as to the adoption of this Ordinance. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of , Dennis Michael Mayor I, JANICE REYNOLDS, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the day of , 2017, and was finally passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the day of , 2017, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEMBERS: ATTEST: Janice Reynolds City Clerk P370 P371 REPORT DATE: July 19, 2017 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Elisa Cox, Deputy City Manager Joanna Marrufo, Management Aide SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO CONDUCT FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 913 AMENDING THE DEFINITION OF SMOKING IN THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE TO INCLUDE ELECTRONIC SMOKING DEVICES AND PROHIBIT ELECTRONIC SMOKING DEVICE USE WHEREVER SMOKING IS CURRENTLY PROHIBITED IN THE CITY RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council conduct first reading of Ordinance No. 913, amending the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code (RCMC) Section 8.21.020 — SMOKING REGULATED OR PROHIBITED — establishing an updated smoking definition to include electronic smoking devices. BACKGROUND: The use of electronic smoking devices has increased at an alarming rate. As a result, state and federal legislation have taken action to prohibit the use of electronic smoking devices wherever smoking is prohibited. Electronic smoking devices, commonly known as "e -cigarettes," "e - hookahs," and "electronic cigarettes," are battery -powered devices that are designed to mimic cigarettes by vaporizing a nicotine -laced liquid (e -juice) that is inhaled by the user. E -liquid typically uses propylene glycol and/or glycerin as a solvent for the nicotine and flavoring chemicals (Surgeon General Report, 2016). On June 9, 2016, California began regulating electronic smoking devices, and included electronic cigarettes, cigars, pipes and hookahs in their tobacco product definition. California also increased the legal smoking age from 18 to 21 years (active duty members in the U.S. Armed Forces under 21 are exempted). On August 9, 2016 the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) included electronic smoking devices in their tobacco product definition and began regulating the manufacturing, distribution, and marketing of these devices through the Federal Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act. The Federal Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act also prohibits the sale of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (electronic smoking devices) to anyone younger than 18 years of age (and requires age verification via photo ID). The proposed amendment will align the City's current smoking policies with national and state tobacco regulations by including electronic smoking devices in the smoking definition of the City's municipal code. San Bernardino County has also updated their smoking regulations to include Page 1 of 6 P372 electronic smoking devices in their smoking definition which bans their use at all county facilities. Other southern California cities that have updated their code include, but are not limited to, Riverside, Corona, Pomona, San Diego, Adelanto, Beaumont, Los Angeles, Long Beach, and Alhambra. Public Health Risks According to the 2016 U.S. Surgeon General Report, "E -cigarettes: A Community Health Threat," the use of electronic smoking devices has many negative health consequences. E -cigarette use among youth and young adults is strongly linked to the use of other tobacco products, such as regular cigarettes, cigars, hookah, and smokeless tobacco (Surgeon General Report, 2016). The aerosol from e -cigarettes can contain harmful and potentially harmful chemicals, including nicotine; ultrafine particles that can be inhaled deep into the lungs; flavoring such diacetyl, a chemical linked to a serious lung disease; volatile organic compounds such as benzene, which is found in car exhaust; and heavy metals, such as nickel, tin, and lead. Risks include: • An increase number of youth and young adults who are exposed to nicotine. • Potential for non-smokers to start smoking conventional cigarettes and other burned tobacco products. Ongoing nicotine addiction so smokers continue using tobacco products instead of quitting completely. An increase likelihood that former smokers will again become addicted to nicotine by using e -cigarettes, and will start using burned tobacco products again. The 2014 Surgeon General Report states there is sufficient evidence to infer that: (a) nicotine activates multiple biological pathways through which smoking increases risk for disease; (b) nicotine exposure during fetal development, a critical window for brain development, has lasting adverse consequences for brain development; (c) nicotine adversely affects maternal and fetal health during pregnancy, contributing to multiple adverse outcomes such as preterm delivery and stillbirth; and (d) nicotine exposure during adolescence, a critical window for brain development, may have lasting adverse consequences for brain development and cognition. Data/Trends National trends show that e -cigarettes are the most commonly used form of tobacco by youth in the U.S., and dual use of e -cigarettes and conventional cigarettes is common among youth and young adults (ages 18-25) (Surgeon General Report, 2016). A national survey showed that more than half (60%) of U.S. teens believe that e -cigarettes cause little or only some harm, as long as they are used sometimes but not every day. 12.6% of adults have tried an e -cigarette (Center for Disease Control, 2015). E -cigarette use among middle and high school students has increased significantly from 1% to 14% for middle schoolers and 5% to 38% for high schoolers between 2011 and 2015 (Surgeon General Report, 2016). State reports reveal similar trends. The California Health Interview Survey (2014) showed that the use of electronic cigarettes among those between the ages of 18 and 29 tripled in one year, from 2.3% to 7.6%. The California Biennial State Healthy Kids Survey (2013-2015) showed that 13% of 7th graders, 26% of 91h graders, and 32% of 11th graders have used e -cigarettes in their lifetime. Page 2 of 6 ANALYSIS: P373 The Healthy RC Youth Leaders have identified smoking and underage tobacco use as atop health priority and have worked over the last several years to develop and implement tobacco and smoking prevention strategies. In 2014, they applied for, and secured, a nationally competitive grant that addressed how tobacco companies marketed their products to youth. They developed a comprehensive prevention campaign and spoke to middle school students at large assemblies about the harmful effects of smoking. Realizing that underage access and usage of electronic smoking devices were increasing among their peers, the Healthy RC Youth Leaders began to work with City staff on developing recommendations to bring the City's current smoking policies in alignment with recent federal and state legislation and regulations. Additionally, they also began developing an educational campaign to demystify the facts of electronic smoking devices to the community and youth. In June 2016, the City developed a multi -departmental team, led by the City Manager's Office, to discuss the current smoking policy and identify gaps in the current smoking definition. The meeting provided a general overview of electronic smoking devices and current smoking regulations in other cities that already amended their policies. Members of the meeting recommended updating the smoking policy to include electronic smoking devices. Three focus groups were conducted with approximately 45 community members to explore community attitudes and beliefs regarding smoking and the usage of electronic smoking devices. All sectors of the community were represented and included community residents, City staff, small-business owners, non -profits, seniors, and teens. Participants recommended that the City should update the smoking definition to include electronic smoking devices. Between November 2016 and May 2017, the City Manager's Office staff and Healthy RC Youth Leaders conducted a survey at 8 middle schools (Vineyard Junior High, Alta Loma Junior High, Cucamonga Middle School, Rancho Cucamonga Middle School, Etiwanda Intermediate, Summit Intermediate, Daycreek Intermediate, Ruth Musser Middle School) and 4 high schools (Rancho Cucamonga High School, Etiwanda High School, Los Osos High School, Alta Loma High School) in the City in order to assess e -cigarette and conventional cigarette use, and their attitudes and beliefs towards e -cigarettes. A representative sample of the student population at each school site was surveyed with over 1,234 students participating. The data results for Rancho Cucamonga follow similar state and national trends. Data shows that teens are accessing and using e -cigarettes at a high percentage. One in 4 high school students and 4% of middle school students said they have tried an e -cigarette before (Figure A). The majority of middle and high school students access e -cigarettes through a family member or friend (Figure B). Overall, the majority of middle school students (53%) and high school students (68%) agreed or strongly agreed to the statement "All e -cigarette and tobacco products are dangerous" (Figure C). Page 3 of 6 Figure A Yes 2 5`: Figure B Have you used an e -cigarette or any vape products before, even one or two puffs? No Middle School Students 96% n=520 High School 750/ Students n=714 If you have tried an e -cigarette, how did you access it? Bought it at a Paid someone vape shop/store to buy for me Middle School Students 7 26% n=17 High School Students , 3 n=124 Page 4 of 6 Family /Friend Gave ito me 65% 89% P374 P375 Figure C How strongly do you agree with the statement? "All e -cigarette or tobacco products are dangerous" Middle 'trong!y Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree School students 15% 21% 9% 17% N=577 High School 9: 23% 16% 7%9% students N=708 The proposed amendment will modify the City's current policy by prohibiting the use of electronic smoking devices wherever smoking is prohibited within Rancho Cucamonga. In the RCMC Section 8.21.020, smoke or smoking will be defined as "the carrying or holding of a lighted pipe, cigar, cigarette, hookah, electronic smoking device or any other lighted smoking equipment or the lighting or emitting or exhaling of the smoke of a pipe, cigar, cigarette, hookah, electronic smoking device or other kind of smoking equipment. The term 'smoke' also means the gaseous products and particles created by the use of a lighted pipe, cigar, cigarette, hookah, electronic smoking device or other kind of smoking equipment." The amendment will apply to all locations currently identified in the RCMC where smoking is prohibited, including: • Elevators • Public parks, trails, playgrounds and other recreational areas • Hospitals, health care and child care facilities • Public plazas • Meeting and conference rooms • Stadiums • Entertainment facilities • Any parcel of property • Public restrooms • Transit stations • Indoor service lines • Outdoor service lines • Eating establishments • Polling places • Indoor office and lobby areas • Retail food marketing establishments • Retail stores • Banks and other financial institutions • Public buildings and structures • Entrances to City facilities Page 5 of 6 Attached for the City Council's consideration is Ordinance No. 913 amending the RCMC Section 8.21.020 — SMOKING REGULATED OR PROHIBITED — establishing an updated smoking definition to include electronic smoking devices. FISCAL IMPACT: Implementation of the attached ordinance would require the City to regulate electronic smoking devices through proper signage. Smoking signs throughout the City already include no smoking and reference the municipal code. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: ENHANCING PREMIER COMMUNITY STATUS This ordinance will enhance the Rancho Cucamonga's status a premier community by improving the quality of life for all who live, work, play, and learn in the City. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 — Ordinance No. 913 Page 6 of 6 P376 ORDINANCE NO. 913 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AMENDING RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 8.21.020 TO MODIFY THE DEFINITION OF "SMOKE OR SMOKING" The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows: Section 1. Section 8.21.020 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended to modify the definition of "smoke or smoking" to read as follows: "Smoke or smoking means the carrying or holding of, a lighted pipe, cigar, cigarette, hookah, electronic smoking device, or any other lighted smoking equipment or the lighting or emitting or exhaling of the smoke of a pipe, cigar, cigarette, hookah, electronic smoking device or other kind of smoking equipment. The term `smoke' also means the gaseous products or particles created by the use of a lighted pipe, cigar, cigarette, hookah, electronic smoking device or other kind of smoking equipment." Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of , 2017. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: Mayor ATTEST: Janice Reynolds, City Clerk I, JANICE REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a Regular Meeting of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the day of , 2017, and was passed at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the day of , 2017. Executed this day of , 2017, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice Reynolds, City Clerk 1123 1 -0001 \2069507v l .doc ATTACHMENT 1 P377 Ordinance No.913 Electronic Smoking Devices What is an electronic smoking 11' J I -D W device? Electronic cigarettes, e -cigarettes, e -hookahs, vape pens, hookah pens E -juice C S L-- Updated Tobacco Regulations Ir ZIFORKSP _ • • Includes electronic smoking devices (e -cigarette, cigar, pipe, or hookah, and products) in secondhand smoking laws. Smokin• Raises Legal Smoking Age to 21 (active duty members in the Policy, U.S. Armed Forces under 21 are exempted). June 2016 L- -j • Regulates electronic smoking devices (e -cigarettes, cigar, pipe, or hookah, and products) the same way it regulates other tobacco products. • Imposes age limit restrictions on sale of electronic smoking devices to 18 nationwide. • Restricts sampling and requires warning labels of e-cigarett and related products. L RCMC Smoking Policy Chapter 8.21 - SMOKING REGULATED OR PROHIBITED 8.21.020 - Definitions. "Smoke" or "smoking" means the carrying or holding of a lighted pipe, cigar, cigarette or any other lighted smoking equipment or the lighting or emitting or exhaling of the smoke of a pipe, cigar, cigarette or other kind of smoking equipment. "Smoke" also means the gaseous products and particles created by the use of a lighted pipe, cigar, cigarette or other kind of smoking equipment. RCMC Smoking Policy Smoking is prohibited in the City in the following locations: • Elevators • Public parks, trails, playgrounds, and other recreational areas • Hospitals, health care, and child care facilities • Public plazas • Meeting and conference rooms • Stadiums • Entertainment facilities • Any City parcel • Public restrooms • Transit stations • Indoor service lines • Outdoor service lines • Eating establishments • Polling places • Indoor office and lobby areas • Retail food marketing establishments • Retail stores • Banks and other financial institutions • Public buildings and structures • Entrances to City facilities Aerosol from e -cigarettes contain harmful chemicals, including I nicotine, ultrafine particles, benzene, nickel, tin, diacetyl, and It Ma lead. KOTINE Electronic smoking devices sustain nicotine addiction so smokers anst ,rj continue using tobacco products instead of quitting completely. E -cigarette use among youth and young adults is strongly linked to the use of other tobacco products, such as regular cigarettes, cigars, hookah, and smokeless tobacco. IML CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 0 C 30 LJ �+-- 20 tW 15 M 10 V 5 a D E -cigarette Use Among Teens 2011 20� 201 Year Source: National Youth Tobacco Survey 2011-2015 2014 --*--Middle School High School --*—All Students 2015 60% of U.S. teens believe that e -cigarettes cause little or only some harm as long as they are used sometimes but not every day. 12.6% of U.S. adults have tried an e -cigarette. Center for Disease Control, 2015 • Led by the City Manager's Office • Assessed current policy and identified gaps • Developed policy recommendations • 45 community members, seniors, teens, small- business owners, non -profits, and City staff • Developed policy recommendations • Gathered and analyzed data regarding teen's usage of, and beliefs towards, e -cigarettes • 1,234 participants from 4 high schools and 8 middle schools Have you used an e -cigarette or any vape products before, even one or two puffs? Yes No Middle School students 4% 96% High School k6A students 25% 75% Total Number of participants : 1,234 Ifyou have tried an e-ci arette how did g you access it? Bought it at a Paid someone Family member/friend gave it to me vape shop/store to buy for me Middle School Students 12% 26% 65% High School Students 11% 89% Policy Recommendation • Amend the smoking definition "Smoke" or "smoking" means the carrying or holding of a lighted pipe, cigar, cigarette, hookah, electronic smoking device or any other lighted smoking equipment or the lighting or emitting or exhaling of the smoke of a pipe, cigar, cigarette, hookah, electronic smoking device or other kind of smoking equipment. "Smoke" also means the gaseous products and particles created by the use of a lighted pipe, cigar, cigarette, hookah, electronic smoking device or other kind of smoking equipment. • Prohibit the use of electronic smoking devices where smoking is currently prohibited Next Steps • School presentations led by Healthy RC Youth Leaders • Social Media • Newsletters • Billboard • Signage • Current smoking signs throughout the City reference RCMC Smoking Policy Ordinance Youth Leaders Smoking Prevention Education Campaign City Council Recommendation Approve Ordinance No. 913 to modify Section 8.21.020 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to include electronic smoking device and hookah to the smoking definition. Questions? Cartridg Tank 41 6j 0 0 0 0 0 tomizer attery Pack �.�s u o ■ �� ISI " ra The atomizer is the most important part of any electronic cigarette. The atomizer is the part that turns the liquid into vapor. It does this by heating a coil that is in contact with the filler material containing the e -liquid. o �. J ® r UO C 07/19/2017 City Council Meeting: Item 11: First Reading of Ordinance No. 913 (Administrative Hearing Item) July 19, 2017 The Honorable L. Dennis Michael Mayor, City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: 2017.07.19 Agenda Item 11 Dear Mayor Michael and Members of Rancho Cucamonga city council: M Cancer Action Network- Apo etwork- A4poW The American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network (ACS CAN) is committed to protecting the health and well-being of the citizens of Rancho Cucamonga through evidence -based policy and legislative solutions designed to eliminate cancer as a major health problem. We support the passage and implementation of smoke-free protections that include prohibiting the use of electronic cigarettes and other electronic smoking products, for all who live or work in the city of Rancho Cucamonga. Smoking remains the leading cause of preventable death in the U.S., but it is not only smokers who breathe in the deadly smoke from tobacco use—everyone around them is forced to inhale it too. Exposure to secondhand smoke causes many of the same tobacco -related diseases and premature deaths as active smoking. The U.S. Surgeon General has declared that there is no safe level of exposure to secondhand smoke and in fact, 42,000 Americans die each year due to inhaling the smoke of others. More recently, the US Surgeon General has stated that "e -cigarette aerosol is not harmless. It can contain harmful and potentially harmful constituents, including nicotine." E -cigarette use is on the rise and action is required. Since the introduction of e -cigarettes to the U.S. market almost a decade ago, the marketing and use of these products have increased. A study from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) found that e -cigarette use increased in high school students from 1.5 percent in 2011 to 16 percent in 2015. Among middle school students, e -cigarette use increased from 0.6 percent to 5.3 percent between 2011 and 2015. Our recommended definition is as follows "Smoking" means inhaling, exhaling, burning, or carrying any lighted or heated cigar, cigarette, or pipe, or any other lighted or heated tobacco or plant product intended for inhalation, including hookahs and marijuana, whether natural or synthetic, in any manner or in any form. "Smoking" also includes the use of an electronic smoking device which creates an aerosol or vapor, in any manner or in any form. American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network 5333 Mission Center Rd, Ste. 105; San Diego CA 92108 619.682.7416 •(F) 619.296.0928 • Iynda.barbour@cancer.ora We further recommend the addition of our definition of electronic smoking devices to improve effective enforcement: Electronic Smoking Device" means any product containing or delivering nicotine or any other substance intended for human consumption that can be used by a person in any manner for the purpose of inhaling vapor or aerosol from the product. The term includes any such device, whether manufactured, distributed, marketed, or sold as an e -cigarette, e -cigar, e -pipe, e - hookah, or vape pen, or under any other product name or descriptor. The use of e -cigarettes can undermine the public health benefits that continue to be achieved by smoke- free laws. Adoption of this amendment will ensure that wherever smoking is already prohibited in the city (in such places as parks, service lines, and some public event spaces) that the usage of electronic cigarettes is also prohibited. Laws that protect nonusers from exposure to secondhand smoke, including the aerosol from electronic cigarettes, reduce the acceptability of smoking, and in turn, reduce the number of smokers by preventing youth from starting to smoke and by supporting those trying to quit. ACS CAN urges this council to take this opportunity to protect all residents in the City of Rancho Cucamonga and ensure that all residents are protected from second-hand smoke, wherever they live, work or play. This can be done by expanding the city's smoke-free policies to include prohibitions on smoking in outdoor dining areas, entryways to all buildings, sidewalks, outdoor worksites, and multi- unit residences properties, including common areas. Secondhand smoke travels from a doorway into a building, from an outdoor smoking patio to the indoor areas, or from an attached housing unit or common area to a non-smoking unit. A comprehensive smoke-free ordinance will help to protect residents from unintentional exposure and the cancers caused by that exposure and will further reinforce the city-wide commitment to encourage healthy behaviors. Rancho Cucamonga citizens are making healthier choices for themselves and their families in part because of your vision for a healthy city and quality of life for all residents to live, work and play. Everyone has the right to breathe smoke-free air and they should not have to endure being unwillingly exposed to the smoke of others. Smoke-free policies help to further promote a healthy environment that encourages outdoor recreation and communicates that this is a healthful place for families. We urge your support with our suggested amendment. Sincerely, r I Lynda Barbour, MPH Director, Government Relations, Southern Region American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network Cc: Council members American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network 5333 Mission Center Rd, Ste. 105; San Diego CA 92108 619.682.7416 •(F) 619.296.0928 • Iynda.barbour@cancer.ora P378 STAFF REPORT DATE: July 19, 2017 TO: President and Members of the Board of Directors FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Mike Costello, Fire Chief�� Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director.41 Michelle Cowles, Management Aide SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE RESOLUTION NO. FD 17-016 ADOPTING THE FIRE DISTRICT GENERAL FUND FINAL BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017/18 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Fire Board approve Resolution No. FD 17-016 adopting the General Fund Final Budget for FY 2017/18 for $42,353,680 which is a combination of $26,663,040 General Fund operational expenditures, $140 Fire Technology Fee Fund expenditures, and $15,690,500 Capital Reserve expenditures. BACKGROUND: The Health and Safety Code, commencing with Section 13890 et seq, requires that Fire Protection District: 1. adopt a preliminary budget; 2. publish notice regarding a public hearing for final budget adoption; and 3. on or before October 1St of each year, the Board shall adopt its final budget. ANALYSIS: In compliance with the above requirements, the Fire District Board of Directors has: 1. conducted a public budget workshop on June 8, 2017, and adopted the preliminary budget on June 22, 2017; 2. published on two (2) occasions in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin notices regarding the public hearing for consideration of final budget adoption; and 3. submitted a proposed resolution adopting the General Fund Final Budget during the Board meeting scheduled for July 19, 2017. The preliminary budget has been available for public inspection in accordance with the Health and Safety Code FISCAL IMPACT: The actions taken by the Fire Board will establish the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District's final spending plan for Fiscal Year 2017/18. Page 1 of 2 P379 CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE RESOLUTION NO. FD 17-016 ADOPTING THE FIRE DISTRICT GENERAL FUND FINAL BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017/18. PAGE Two COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: PUBLIC SAFETY Delivery of vital fire and life safety services to residents, visitors, and businesses through an innovative combination of risk reduction and emergency response programs. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 — Resolution No. FD 17-016 Page 2 of 2 P380 RESOLUTION NO. FD 17-016 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A FINAL BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR JULY 1, 2017 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2018 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District adopted its General Fund Preliminary Budget on June 22, 2017, and made said preliminary budget available for inspection by interested taxpayers; and WHEREAS, the Board of Directors noticed a time and place for a public hearing regarding the preliminary budget; and WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District conducted said hearing in accordance with requirements set forth in the Health and Safety Code of the State of California. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District does hereby adopt the General Fund Final Budget for the District for fiscal year 2017/18 and is hereby fixed and established as set forth and attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 19th day of July 2017. ATTACHMENT i .9� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 19, 2017 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R, Gillison, City Manager S o' C INITIATED BY: Candyce Burnett, City Planner M Donald Granger, Senior Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2016-00452 – DR HORTON – A request to change the Victoria Community Plan Zoning Designation for 28.4 acres of land at the southwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road from Regionally Related Office/Commercial (RROC) to Mixed Use (MU) in the Victoria Community Plan (VCP) related to the construction of a mixed use project consisting of 380 residential units, a 71 room hotel and two restaurant buildings totaling 12,000 square feet, located at the southwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road — APN: 1090-331-05. Related Files: Preliminary Review DRC2015-01102, Pre -Application Review DRC2016-00142, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19762, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20032, Conditional Use Permit DRC2016-00449, Design Review DRC2016-00450, Uniform Sign Program DRC2016-00451 and Minor Exception DRC2016-00508. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts and approve Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRC2016-00452 through adoption of the attached Ordinance. BACKGROUND: A. Preliminary Review: In November of 2015, DR Horton filed a Preliminary Review Application with staff to receive Design and Technical comments for the proposed 28.4 acre mixed-use project. Following receipt of staffs Design and Technical comments and a couple of meetings to review subsequent iterations of revised site plans, the applicant opted to file a Pre -Application Review to obtain comments and input from the Planning Commission prior to filing a formal application. B. Planning Commission Workshop: On March 23, 2016, the applicant presented conceptual designs to the Planning Commission at a workshop prior to filing a formal application submittal in order to receive broad, general comments and direction. Following a brief overview and comments from staff, the Commission reviewed the project layout and gave general comments and direction. In summary, the Commission provided the following comments and direction to the applicant: CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DRC2016-00452— DR HORTON July 19, 2017 Page 2 • Support was expressed for the proposed land use amendment to the Victoria Community Plan to change the zoning to Mixed Use to be consistent with the General Plan. • Direction was given that stressed the importance of adding active recreational amenities and providing sufficient guest parking. • In addition to the two restaurants, some of the Commissioners supported an additional commercial component along Day Creek Boulevard. • General support was indicated for the architecture, site layout, and the installation of a low wall topped with Plexiglas along Base Line Road and Day Creek Boulevard. • Feedback was given noting the importance of completing the commercial portion of the project along with the residential portion so that the project is a viable mixed use project at opening. C. Planning Commission Public Testimony and Commission Discussion Summary: At the Planning Commission public hearing on June 14, 2017, one resident expressed concerns regarding potential impacts from increased traffic, and another gave testimony regarding the loss of potential habitat for plants and animal species, such as Riversidian Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub Habitat (RAFSS). Staff and the applicant's consultants responded that both Base Line Road and Day Creek Boulevard are adequately engineered and designed to absorb the trips generated from the project, and that according to biological studies prepared by the applicant and evaluated and affirmed by an outside professional peer, the site is not a functioning RAFSS vegetation community, and that the site is comprised of buckwheat and disturbed buckwheat. In response to public comments, the applicant noted that the linear park along the south edge contains a native plant garden that will demonstrate native plant species. Four residents indicated that they were in favor of the project, and indicated support for the mixed use concept. During discussion, all Commissioners indicated support for the mixed use project, stated that the architecture of the project was well -executed, and noted that the site is appropriate for a mixed use project that features a variety of attached and detached "for sale" housing product. D. Planning Commission Action: On June 14, 2017, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution of Approval 17-54 recommending 1) that the City Council adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts and 2) that the City Council approve Victoria Community Plan Amendment (VCPA) DRC2016-00452. The VCPA proposes to change the zoning for the 28.4 acre project site at the southwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road from Regionally Related Office Commercial (RROC) to Mixed Use. The VCPA is a necessary zone change to facilitate the related mixed use project consisting of 380 residential units, a 71 room hotel and two restaurant buildings totaling 12,000 square feet at the project site. In addition, as permitted by Development Code Section 17.14.060-B, the Planning Commission, contingent upon the Council's adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration and approval of the VCPA, approved the following related development applications: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19762, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20032, Conditional Use Permit DRC2016-00449, Design Review DRC2016-00450, Uniform Sign Program DRC2016-00451 and Minor Exception DRC2016-00508. For a detailed analysis of the development applications, landscape, site plan and architecture approved by the Planning Commission, refer to Planning Commission Staff Report dated June 14, 2017 (Attachment 1). P382 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DRC2016-00452— DR NORTON July 19, 2017 Page 3 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Project Density: 15.3 dwelling units/acre B. Site Characteristics: Overall, the project site is approximately 30 gross acres, 28.4 acres net, with 24.9 acres devoted to the residential portion (single-family and condominiums) and 3.5 acres allocated for the commercial uses (hotel and two restaurant pads). The rectangular shaped parcel is approximately 840 feet wide (west -east) and approximately 1,500 feet deep (north -south). The site has approximately 37 feet of fall, measured from near the north property line (elevation 1,310) to the south property line (elevation 1,273). Curb and gutter are existing along the Base Line Road and Day Creek Boulevard frontage. C. Surrounding Area: The project site is bordered by Base Line Road along the north boundary; Day Creek Boulevard along the east boundary; a 16.8 acre single-family neighborhood zoned Mixed Use/Single-Family (4-6 units/acre) that is developed at 4.8 dwelling units/acre within the Victoria Arbors Master Plan in the VCP west of Day Creek Boulevard, between Church Street and the south boundary of the project; and a Southern California Edison transmission corridor zoned Open Space and the Day Creek Flood Control channel zoned Flood Control along the west boundary. Across Base Line Road at the northwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road is a future neighborhood shopping center that is under construction that will be anchored by Stater Brothers, and across Day Creek Boulevard at the southeast corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road is an existing neighborhood center anchored by Sprouts Farmer's Market. ANALYSIS: A. General: The project location is located along a designated view corridor in the General Plan (Day Canyon), will have high visibility at the intersection of two major divided arterials, and is one of the few remaining prominent parcels of nearly 30 acres in the City that has high land use planning and economic synergy potential with the existing commercial uses along Day Creek Boulevard, such as Victoria Gardens. The applicant proposes developing P383 Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Vacant Land Mixed Use Regionally Related Office/Commercial North Future Neighborhood Neighborhood Commercial Village Commercial, Victoria Shopping Center Community Plan Single -Family Mixed Use Single -Family, South Residences Mixed Use Victoria Arbors Master Plan, Victoria Community Plan Mixed Use/Village Commercial Neighborhood Shopping and Mixed Use Single -Family, East Center and Single -Family Mixed Use Victoria Arbors Master Plan, Dwelling Units Victoria Community Plan Overhead Electrical West Transmission and Flood Flood Control/Utility Corridor Open Space Control Channel B. Site Characteristics: Overall, the project site is approximately 30 gross acres, 28.4 acres net, with 24.9 acres devoted to the residential portion (single-family and condominiums) and 3.5 acres allocated for the commercial uses (hotel and two restaurant pads). The rectangular shaped parcel is approximately 840 feet wide (west -east) and approximately 1,500 feet deep (north -south). The site has approximately 37 feet of fall, measured from near the north property line (elevation 1,310) to the south property line (elevation 1,273). Curb and gutter are existing along the Base Line Road and Day Creek Boulevard frontage. C. Surrounding Area: The project site is bordered by Base Line Road along the north boundary; Day Creek Boulevard along the east boundary; a 16.8 acre single-family neighborhood zoned Mixed Use/Single-Family (4-6 units/acre) that is developed at 4.8 dwelling units/acre within the Victoria Arbors Master Plan in the VCP west of Day Creek Boulevard, between Church Street and the south boundary of the project; and a Southern California Edison transmission corridor zoned Open Space and the Day Creek Flood Control channel zoned Flood Control along the west boundary. Across Base Line Road at the northwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road is a future neighborhood shopping center that is under construction that will be anchored by Stater Brothers, and across Day Creek Boulevard at the southeast corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road is an existing neighborhood center anchored by Sprouts Farmer's Market. ANALYSIS: A. General: The project location is located along a designated view corridor in the General Plan (Day Canyon), will have high visibility at the intersection of two major divided arterials, and is one of the few remaining prominent parcels of nearly 30 acres in the City that has high land use planning and economic synergy potential with the existing commercial uses along Day Creek Boulevard, such as Victoria Gardens. The applicant proposes developing P383 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DRC2016-00452— DR HORTON July 19, 2017 Page 4 the 28.4 acre property located at the southwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road with a mixed use project consisting of 380 residential units (329 attached townhomes and 51 single-family detached condos), a 71 room boutique hotel and two restaurant pads totaling 12,000 square feet. Currently, the overall project area is made up of 1 parcel totaling 28.4 acres of land. The project includes the subdivision of the 28.4 acre site into 4 parcels and a residential condominium subdivision for the 380 residential units. B. Victoria Community Plan Amendment: The project site has a General Plan Land Use Designation of Mixed Use; however, the site is currently zoned Regionally Related Office/Commercial (RROC), within the Victoria Community Plan (VCP). The General Plan Land Use Designation of Mixed Use occurred with the 2001 General Plan Update and remained Mixed Use in the 2010 General Plan Update. The VCP was adopted in 1981 and according to staff research has been zoned Regionally Related/Office Commercial since the adoption of the VCP in 1981. The applicant has submitted a Victoria Community Plan Amendment to change the Victoria Community Plan Zoning Designation from RROC to Mixed Use (MU) in order to be consistent with the goals and objectives of the General Plan. When the Victoria Community Plan was first approved over 35 years ago, Mixed Use was not included as a land use category, and the original land use planning goals only contemplated commercial or office at this location because of adjacency to major arterials. The proposed land use amendment is consistent with the General Plan and will implement the goals of the General Plan to achieve a mixed use project at this location that was envisioned since 2001 as the highest and best use of the land that is superior to a commercial/office designation by incorporating multiple land uses under a single project that are interconnected and will contribute positively to the City's General Fund. The zone change will permit the development of the site into a mixed use project featuring hospitality, commercial and residential product at densities that will support the surrounding commercial uses, and enable residents to connect to trails, commercial uses, restaurants and other nearby retail uses through alternative transportation means. The zone change to mixed use will also permit the development of a mixed use project that will align with several General Plan Policies. First, the zone change will provide for a mixed use project that has been designed with input from the community and with a goal of protecting neighborhoods from the encroachment of incompatible activities by including the design of a linear park along the southern edge to function as a buffer to the existing neighborhood to the south, thereby implementing General Plan Land Use Policy LU -1.1 by minimizing negative impacts on the residential living environment. Second, the amendment will provide for a mixed use project that will have detached single-family condos and attached single-family rowhomes in a location that is compatible with the adjacent residential area. The mixed use project has the single-family detached condos located in the southern area of the project, nearest the existing single-family neighborhood in order to provide a transition of density and be of compatible scale, thereby being consistent with General Plan Land Use Policy LU -1.6 which encourages small -lot, single unit and/or detached residential development located in areas where this density would be compatible with adjacent residential neighborhoods. Third, the amendment will change the zoning from Regionally Related Office/Commercial to Mixed Use and will bring the zoning of the Victoria Community Plan into vertical consistency with the General Plan and facilitate a mixed use project, thereby implementing General Plan Policy LU -2.1 which plans for vibrant, pedestrian - P384 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DRC2016-00452— DR HORTON July 19, 2017 Page 5 friendly mixed use and high density residential areas at strategic infill locations along transit routes. There are two Omnitrans bus routes that are nearby to the project site: Route 67 (Base Line Road) and Route 82 (Church Street). C. Mixed Use Concept and Urban Design Features: When the General Plan was adopted in 2010, the primary goal of mixed use areas was to create unique places within a suburban environment that are of higher intensity and density than that of the surrounding area, and integrate commercial, residential and other compatible uses into a project design that is cohesive and interconnected. The project includes several paseos and gathering areas that will facilitate interaction and connectivity to the project. The primary plaza in the residential area features a raised staged area and lounge area with raised seat walls. This plaza is connected to the residential area with a shaded pedestrian walk, and also provides a walkable connection to the hotel. The plaza area is intentionally designed to offer areas that are able to accommodate a variety of uses that promote community and interaction within a livable project, such as art and craft displays, conversation areas, entertainment, community readings, outdoor reading areas, social nodes and outdoor dining. The plaza at the corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road has been designed as a publicly accessible focal point. The plaza will be shared by the two restaurants and will feature a central fountain, decorative paving, accent trees, overhead trellis structures, colored concrete and an architectural tower that pedestrians can pass through and will offer a usable public space and feature outdoor dining. In order to provide a continuity with the existing single-family neighborhood along the south, five single-family condo units along Day Creek Boulevard have been plotted with a rear -on orientation. The site planning for the balance of the project for the townhomes along Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road, restaurants at the corner and the hotel along Day Creek Boulevard intentionally utilizes closer street setbacks than are normally permitted under standard Development Regulations; however, for Mixed Use Districts, the Development Code provides for reduced street setbacks to intentionally create an urban street edge and encourage engagement with active street frontages. The townhomes are designed with patios that front -on to Day Creek and Base Line Road, thereby promoting pedestrian connections to the street, walking, cycling and use of the nearby Pacific Electric Trail via Day Creek Boulevard. Consistent with the goals of Mixed Use Districts to foster a walkable built environment, the project will offer opportunities to walk to neighborhood shopping centers, convenient access to Omnitrans bus routes (Route 67 off Base Line Road and Route 82 off Church Street), bike routes (Day Creek Channel, Pacific Electric Trail, Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road), and enhanced pedestrian sidewalks along Day Creek Boulevard. In meeting the design goals of the Mixed Use District and with substantial input from the community, the site includes construction of a privately maintained but publicly accessible linear park along the south edge. The park will provide recreational opportunities for not only the residents at Day Creek Square, but also all residents within walking distance. The linear park will not only provide residents an opportunity for passive and light active recreation but will also provide residents a place to make connections in their community. The park will feature open turf areas for low intensity activities (frisbee, badminton, volleyball, ball throwing), bench areas, shaded areas with game tables, dual bocce ball courts, and a pedestrian plaza with seating. The park also is consistent with Crime Prevention Through P385 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DRC2016-00452— DR HORTON July 19, 2017 Page 6 P386 Environmental Design (CPTED) as the park will feature security cameras to discourage crime. These cameras will be required to connect to the Public Video Safety Network. The San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department has reviewed and provided input that was incorporated in the final park site plan as well. D. Parking Analysis: For the commercial uses (hotel and 2 restaurant pads). the project is designed with 193 stalls, meeting the required amount (120 stalls for the restaurant and 73 for the hotel). Although the Development Code permits Mixed Use projects to count tandem parking towards meeting the required parking calculation, the project is not eligible to count the second stall in the 49 tandem garage units as the garages do not meet the required depth (40' required; 36-8" proposed). In order to meet the 2 spaces per unit requirement, (1 space required in garage or carport), for 2 bedroom tandem unit, the applicant has provided 49 surface stalls. In total for all uses, the project requires 1;080 stalls, and 1,095 are provided. As indicated in Table A, the project has 15 surplus spaces. Additionally, 34 parking stalls from the restaurant area will be made available at night to early morning as shared parking for the residential area in order to provide additional parking and make optimum use of the available parking stalls. Parking study: In accordance with Section 17.64.060(D), a parking study was prepared by the applicant's consultant (Urban Crossroads) to demonstrate adequate parking. The parking study verified the land uses, applied ratios and calculations. The parking study validated the conclusion that adequate parking exists based upon the required ratios in the Code. TABLE A Number of Number Code Standard Bedrooms Required -. Total Required Parking Spaces Total SpacesParking Parking Two Bedroom 2 Spaces/Unit Units 94 1 Garage or Carport)94 spaces 188 188 Three Bedroom 2 Spaces/Unit Units 235 (2 in Garage or Carport) 235 102 spaces 470 470 Single -Family 51 2 Car Garage 102 102 Guest Parking 235 1 per 3 units 127 142 Subtotal: Residential Parking 887 902 Surplus +15 Hotel (71 rooms) 73 73 Two Restaurants (12,000 sq. ft total) 120 120 Subtotal: Commercial 193 193 Surplus/deficit 0 Totals 1,080 1,095 Surplus/deficit +15 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DRC2016-00452— DR HORTON July 19, 2017 Page 7 E. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. In order to adequately evaluate potential environmental impacts from the project, 15 technical reports were prepared by professional consultants from multiple disciplines, including, but not limited to: air quality, biological resources, focused biological reports for plants, birds, mammals, reptiles, peer review of focused biological reports, cultural and paleontological resources, greenhouse gas, traffic and noise. The peer review of all four biological focused reports affirmed the conclusions in the original reports. A comprehensive discussion of the environmental impacts and any necessary mitigation measures is in the Initial Study Parts II and III. During the public comment period for the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, staff received a total of ten letters commenting on potential impacts to biological resources from the proposed project (eight from residents and two from agencies [County of San Bernardino Department of Public Works and California Department of Fish and Wildlife]). Specifically, the comment letters expressed concern over the potential loss of Riversidian Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub Habitat (RAFSS). In order to evaluate impacts to biological resources, including RAFSS habitat, the applicant directed professional biologists to prepare a total of four biological reports to evaluate the potential impacts to biological resources. Impacts to plants, animals, RAFFS, the San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat, California Gnatcatcher, and habitat evaluation for the Delhi Sands Flower Loving Fly were conducted. The findings of the reports are summarized as follows: 1. No special status plants are on site. 2. There are impacts to State or federally listed animal species. Both the Gnatcatcher, and the San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat were not detected during surveys. 3. Based on the results of the trapping study, the project will remove habitat supporting two non -listed, special -status small mammals, including the San Diego desert woodrat and northwestern San Diego pocket mouse. However, due to the relatively small size and the general isolation of the site, and the relatively low sensitivity of these species (woodrat and mouse), the loss of habitat at the property would not have a substantial, adverse effect on these species, and no mitigation is required. 4. Natural episodic flooding has been eliminated, thus the site's natural ability to support a functional alluvial scrub community has been eliminated. 5. The Site is dominated by buckwheat scrub and disturbed buckwheat, and contains less than 1 % scalebroom. 6. The site contains no known listed species (plants or animals) or animals that are associated with alluvial scrub habitats. In sum, according to the biological reports, the site contains Riversidian sage scrub dominated by CA Buckwheat, and less than two-tenths of 1% of scalebroom (indicator species of alluvial systems) is present on site, which is less than the 1% threshold to be classified as scalebroom scrub community. The vegetation community does not have conservation value as the critical flood regime has been modified, and the site is isolated P387 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DRC2016-00452— DR HORTON July 19, 2017 Page 8 from Day Creek/Etiwanda Alluvial Fan functioning RAFFS. All four of the biological reports and the corresponding findings were subjected to a peer review by an outside biologist, and the peer reviewed affirmed the findings in the biological reports. Lastly, a follow-up survey was conducted in May of 2017 and no special status plants were detected Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures related to air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, geology and soils, greenhouse gas emissions, hazards and waste materials, hydrology and water quality, noise, public services, transportation/traffic, and tribal cultural resources, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation measures for the project. FISCAL IMPACT/REVENUE ANALYSIS: In order to ensure that the project does not adversely impact revenues to the City's General Fund, and that the proposed project's annual costs for providing public services do not exceed revenues generated, a Fiscal Impact Analysis was completed by Development Planning and Financing Group (July 2016). This revenue/cost analysis is especially critical since the project includes a Victoria Community Plan Amendment to change the zoning from Regionally Related Office/Commercial to Mixed Use. For the analysis, it is populated with two scenarios: 1) No zone change, and developing the site under the existing zoning, floor area ratios with a 163,350 square feet of commercial use and 392,000 square feet of office use; and 2) an analysis of the proposed mixed use project by DR Horton. For Scenario 1, it is estimated that a proposed retail/office project would generate $788,000 in annual reoccurring revenue, and $334,000 in reoccurring costs, resulting in a net fiscal positive impact to the City of $454,000. For Scenario 2, it is estimated that the proposed mixed use project would generate $691,000 in annual reoccurring revenue, and $215,000 in reoccurring costs, resulting in a net fiscal positive impact to the City of $476,000. The net impact to the City is positive under both land use scenarios, and the analysis demonstrates that reoccurring General Fund revenues generated by the project will be sufficient to cover all reoccurring General Fund Costs. FISCAL IMPACT/PROPERTY TAX AND IMPACT FEES: The project site currently is assessed an annual property tax. A percentage of this annual tax is shared with the City. The proposed development will increase the value of the project site and the City's annual share of the property tax will increase accordingly. The project proponent also will be responsible for paying one-time impact fees. These fees are intended to address the increased demand for City services due to the proposed project. The following types of services that these impact fees would support include the following: library services, transportation infrastructure, drainage infrastructure, animal services, police, parks, and community and recreation services. P388 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DRC2016-00452— DR HORTON July 19, 2017 Page 9 COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Although a specific current City Council goal does not apply to the project, the project is consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan and the objectives of the Development Code. Additionally, the project will meet two ongoing objectives of the City Council: 1) AUGMENT PUBLIC SAFETY: The linear park will be constructed with cameras that will connect to the Public Video Safety Network. This use of technology will enable greater monitoring of public areas and discourage crime and nuisance activities. 2) GENERAL PLAN IMPLEMENTATION: As analyzed in prior sections, the proposed project includes a Victoria Community Plan Amendment. This legislative action will implement the goals of the General Plan to achieve a mixed use project at this location that was envisioned since 2001 as the highest and best use of the land. The land use amendment will change the zoning from Regionally Related Office/Commercial to Mixed Use and will bring the zoning of the Victoria Community Plan into vertical consistency with the General Plan and facilitate a mixed use project, thereby implementing General Plan Policy LU -2.1 by providing mixed use projects and high density residential areas at strategic infill locations. PUBLIC AND AGENCY CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 1,000 -foot radius of the project site. Prior to the deadline for the Planning Commission Staff Report, the City received seven letters submitting comments on the proposed project (Planning Commission Staff Report dated June 14, 2017; Exhibit O). Five of the seven letters cite concerns over the loss Riversidian Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub Habitat (RAFSS), and two letters provided comments regarding the project design (parking, site planning, circulation, traffic, etc.) Prior to the deadline for the City Council Staff Report, staff received six letters submitting comments (Attachment 5). Of the six letters, 3 were from residents expressing concern regarding the loss of RAFSS habitat, and one letter was from a resident expressing support for the project. The remaining two letters were agency letters from the County of San Bernardino Department of Public Works, and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife. The agency letters expressed concern over the loss of RAFSS habitat. A comprehensive analysis of all potential biological impacts (plants, animals, RAFSS habitat) and the studies that were conducted is located in the Initial Study (Planning Commission Staff Report dated June 14, 2017; Exhibit N), and a summary of the analysis is located under Section E, Environmental Assessment of this Staff Report. EXHIBITS: Attachment 1 — Planning Commission Staff Report dated June 14, 2017 (with Exhibits) Attachment 2 — Planning Commission Resolution of Approval 17-54 Recommending Approval of Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRC2016-00452 Attachment 3 — Planning Commission Action Agenda for June 14, 2017 Meeting Attachment 4 — Planning Commission Meeting Minutes for June 14, 2017 Meeting Attachment 5 — Agency and Public Correspondence Received Attachment 6 — Draft Ordinance Approving Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRC2016-00452 P389 P390 STAFF REPORT DATE: June 14, 2017 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Candyce Burnett, City Planne(s�' INITIATED BY: Donald Granger, Senior Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2016-00452 – DR HORTON – A request to change the Victoria Community Plan Zoning Designation for 28.4 acres of land at the southwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road from Regionally Related Office/Commercial (RROC) to Mixed Use (MU) in the Victoria Community Plan (VCP) related to the construction of a mixed use project consisting of 380 residential units, a 71 room hotel and two restaurant buildings totaling 12,000 square feet, located at the southwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road — APN 1090-331-05. Related Files Preliminary Review DRC2015-01102. Pre -Application Review DRC2016- 00142, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19762, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20032, Conditional Use Permit DRC2016-00449, Design Review DRC2016-00450, Uniform Sign Program DRC2016-00451 and Minor Exception DRC2016-00508. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. This item will be forwarded to the City Council for final review and action. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19762 – DR HORTON – A request to subdivide 28.4 acres of land into 4 parcels in the Victoria Community Plan (VCP) within the Mixed Use District related to the construction of a mixed use project consisting of 380 residential units, a 71 room hotel and two restaurant buildings totaling 12,000 square feet, located at the southwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road — APN: 1090-331-05. Related Files: Preliminary Review DRC2015-01102, Pre -Application Review DRC2016-00142, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20032, Conditional Use Permit DRC2016-00449, Design Review DRC2016-00450, Uniform Sign Program DRC2016-00451, Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRC2016-00452 and Minor Exception DRC2016-00508. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT20032 – DR HORTON – A request for a residential condominium subdivision for 380 residential units on 28.4 acres of land in the Victoria Community Plan (VCP) within the Mixed Use District related to the construction of a mixed use project consisting of 380 residential units, a 71 room hotel and two restaurant buildings totaling 12,000 square feet, located at the southwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road — APN: 1090-331-05. Related Files: Preliminary Review DRC2015-01102, Pre - Attachment 1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT P391 DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00508 AND DRC2016-00451 – DR HORTON June 14, 2017 Page 2 Application Review DRC2016-00142, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19762, Conditional Use Permit DRC2016-00449, Design Review DRC2016-00450, Uniform Sign Program DRC2016-00451, Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRC2016-00452 and Minor Exception DRC2016-00508. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2016-00450 – DR HORTON – A request for site plan and architectural review in the Victoria Community Plan (VCP) within the Mixed Use District related to the construction of a mixed use project consisting of 380 residential units, a 71 room hotel and two restaurant buildings totaling 12,000 square feet, located at the southwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road — APN: 1090-331-05. Related Files: Preliminary Review DRC2015-01102, Pre - Application Review DRC2016-00142, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19762, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20032, Conditional Use Permit DRC2016-00449, Uniform Sign Program DRC2016-00451, Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRC2016-00452 and Minor Exception DRC2016-00508. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2016-00449 – DR HORTON – A request to operate a bar (Type 70 On Sale General – Restrictive Service) within a hotel in the Victoria Community Plan (VCP) within the Mixed Use District related to the construction of a mixed use project consisting of 380 residential units, a 71 room hotel and two restaurant buildings totaling 12,000 square feet, located at the southwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road — APN: 1090-331-05. Related Files: Preliminary Review DRC2015-01102, Pre -Application Review DRC2016- 00142, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19762, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20032, Design Review DRC2016-00450 and Uniform Sign Program DRC2016-00451, Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRC2016-00452 and Minor Exception DRC2016-00508. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2016- 00508 – DR HORTON – A request to allow 8 foot combination retaining/freestanding wall heights for a mixed use project in the Victoria Community Plan (VCP) within the Mixed Use District related to the construction of a mixed use project consisting of 380 residential units, a 71 room hotel and two restaurant buildings totaling 12,000 square feet, located at the southwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road — APN: 1090-331-05. Related Files: Preliminary Review DRC2015-01102, Pre -Application Review DRC2016-00142, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19762, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20032, Conditional Use Permit DRC2016-00449, Design Review DRC2016-00450, Uniform Sign Program DRC2016-00451 and Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRC2016-00452. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00508 AND DRC2016-00451 – DR HORTON June 14, 2017 Page 3 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM DRC2016-00451 – DR HORTON – A request for a Uniform Sign Program in the Victoria Community Plan (VCP) within the Mixed Use District related to the construction of a mixed use project consisting of 380 residential units, a 71 room hotel and two restaurant buildings totaling 12,000 square feet, located at the southwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road — APN: 1090-331-05. Related Files: Preliminary Review DRC2015-01102, Pre - Application Review DRC2016-00142, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19762, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20032, Conditional Use Permit DRC2016-00449, Design Review DRC2016-00450, Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRC2016-00452 and Minor Exception DRC2016-00508. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission take the following actions: • Recommend that the City Council adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for the project; and • Recommend that the City Council approve Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRC2016- 00542 through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval; and • Approve Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19762, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20032, Design Review DRC2016-00450, Conditional Use Permit DRC2016-00449, Minor Exception DRC2016-00508 and Uniform Sign Program DRC2016-00451 through the adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval with Conditions. BACKGROUND: Preliminary Review: In November of 2015, DR Horton filed a Preliminary Review Application with staff to receive Design and Technical comments for the proposed 28.4 acre mixed-use project. Following receipt of staffs Design and Technical comments and a couple of meetings to review subsequent iterations of revised site plans, the applicant opted to request a Pre - Application Review to obtain comments and input from the Planning Commission prior to filing a formal application. Planning Commission Workshop: On March 23, 2016, the applicant presented conceptual designs to the Planning Commission prior to filing a formal application submittal in order to receive broad, general comments and direction. Following a brief overview and comments from staff, the Commission reviewed the project layout and gave general comments and direction. In summary, the Commission provided the following comments and direction to the applicant: P392 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT P393 DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00508 AND DRC2016-00451 — DR NORTON June 14, 2017 Page 4 • Support was expressed for the proposed land use amendment to the Victoria Community plan to change the zoning to mixed use to be consistent with the General Plan. • Direction was given that stressed the importance of adding active recreational amenities and providing sufficient guest parking. • In addition to the two restaurants, some of the Commissioners supported an additional commercial component along Day Creek Boulevard. • General support was indicated for the architecture, site layout, and the installation of a low wall topped with Plexiglas along Base Line Road and Day Creek Boulevard. • Feedback was given, noting the importance of completing the commercial portion of the project along with the residential portion so that the project is a viable mixed use project at opening. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A. Project Density: 15.3 dwelling units/acre B. Site Characteristics: Overall, the project site is approximately 30 gross acres, 28.4 acres net, with 24.9 acres devoted to the residential portion (single-family and condominiums) and 3.5 acres allocated for the commercial uses (hotel and two restaurant pads). The rectangular shaped parcel is approximately 840 feet wide (west -east) and approximately 1,500 feet deep (north -south). The site has approximately 37 feet of fall, measured from near the north property line (elevation 1310) to the south property line (elevation 1273). Curb and gutter are existing along the Base Line and Day Creek frontage. Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Vacant Land Mixed Use Regionally Related Office/Commercial North Future Neighborhood Neighborhood Commercial Village Commercial, Victoria Shopping Center Community Plan Single -Family Mixed Use Single Family, South Residences Mixed Use Victoria Arbors Master Plan, Victoria Community Plan Mixed Use/Village Commercial Neighborhood Shopping and Mixed Use Single Family, East Center and Single Family Mixed Use Victoria Arbors Master Plan, Dwelling Units Victoria Community Plan Overhead Electrical West Transmission and Flood Flood Control/Utility Corridor Open Space Control Channel B. Site Characteristics: Overall, the project site is approximately 30 gross acres, 28.4 acres net, with 24.9 acres devoted to the residential portion (single-family and condominiums) and 3.5 acres allocated for the commercial uses (hotel and two restaurant pads). The rectangular shaped parcel is approximately 840 feet wide (west -east) and approximately 1,500 feet deep (north -south). The site has approximately 37 feet of fall, measured from near the north property line (elevation 1310) to the south property line (elevation 1273). Curb and gutter are existing along the Base Line and Day Creek frontage. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT P394 DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00508 AND DRC2016-00451 — DR HORTON June 14, 2017 Page 5 C. Surrounding Area: The project site is bordered by Base Line Road along the north boundary; Day Creek Boulevard along the east boundary; a 16.8 acre single-family neighborhood zoned Mixed Use/Single-Family (4-6 units/acre) that is developed at 4.8 dwelling units/acre within the Victoria Arbors Master Plan in the VCP west of Day Creek Boulevard, between Church Street and the south boundary of the project; and a Southern California Edison transmission corridor zoned Open Space and the Day Creek Flood Control channel zoned Flood Control along the west boundary. Across Base Line Road at the northwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road is a future neighborhood shopping center that will be anchored by Stater Brothers that is currently under construction, and across Day Creek Boulevard at the southeast corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road is an existing neighborhood center anchored by Sprouts Farmer's Market. ANALYSIS: A. General: The project location is located along a designated view corridor in the General Plan (Day Canyon), will have high visibility at the intersection of two major divided arterials, and is one of the few remaining prominent parcels of nearly 30 acres in the City that has high land use planning and economic synergy potential with the existing commercial uses along Day Creek Boulevard, such as Victoria Gardens. The applicant proposes developing the 28.4 acre property located at the southwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road with mixed use project consisting of 380 residential units (329 attached townhomes and 51 single-family detached condos), a 71 room boutique hotel and two restaurant pads totaling 12,000 square feet. Currently, the overall project area is made up of 1 parcel totaling 28.4 acres of land. The project includes the subdivision of the 28.4 acre site into 4 parcels and a residential condominium subdivision for the 380 residential units. B. Victoria Community Plan Amendment: The project site has a General Plan Land Use Designation of Mixed Use; however, the site is currently zoned Regionally Related Office/Commercial (RROC), within the Victoria Community Plan (VCP). The General Plan Land Use Designation of Mixed Use occurred with the 2001 General Plan Update and remained Mixed Use in the 2010 General Plan Update. The VCP was adopted in 1981 and according to staff research has been zoned Regionally Related/Office Commercial since the adoption of VCP's in 1981. The applicant has submitted a Victoria Community Plan Amendment to change the Victoria Community Plan Zoning Designation from RROC to Mixed Use (MU) in order to be consistent with the goals and objectives of the General Plan. When the Victoria Community Plan was first approved over 35 years ago, Mixed Use was not included as a land use category, and the original land use planning goals only contemplated commercial or office at this location because of adjacency to major arterials. The proposed land use amendment is consistent with the General Plan and will implement the goals of the General Plan to achieve a mixed use project at this location that was envisioned since 2001 as the highest and best use of the land that is superior to a commercial/office designation by incorporating multiple land uses under a single project that are interconnected and will contribute positively to the City's General Fund. The zone change will permit the development of the site into a mixed use project featuring PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT P395 DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00508 AND DRC2016-00451 — DR NORTON June 14, 2017 Page 6 hospitality, commercial and residential product at densities that will support the surrounding commercial uses, and enable residents to connect to trails, commercial uses, restaurants and other nearby retail uses through alternative transportation means. The zone change to mixed use will also permit the development of a mixed use project that will align with several General Plan Policies. First, the zone change will provide for a mixed use project that has been designed with input from the community and with a goal of protecting neighborhoods from the encroachment of incompatible activities by including the design of a linear park along the southern edge to function as a buffer to the existing neighborhood to the south, thereby implementing General Plan Land Use Policy LU -1.1 by minimizing negative impacts on the residential living environment. Second, the amendment will provide for a mixed use project that will have detached single-family condos and attached single-family rowhomes in a location that is compatible with the adjacent residential area. The mixed use project has the single-family detached condos located in the southern area of the project, nearest the existing single-family neighborhood in order to provide a transition of density and be of compatible scale, thereby being consistent with General Plan Land Use Policy LU -1.6 which encourages small -lot, single unit and/or detached residential development located in areas where this density would be compatible with adjacent residential neighborhoods. Third, the amendment will change the zoning from Regionally Related Office/Commercial to Mixed Use and will bring the zoning of the Victoria Community Plan into vertical consistency with the General Plan and facilitate a mixed use project, thereby implementing General Plan Policy LU -2.1 which plans for vibrant, pedestrian -friendly mixed use and high density residential areas at strategic infill locations along transit routes. There are two Omnitrans bus routes that are nearby to the project site: Route 67 (Base Line Road) and Route 82 (Church Street). C. Parcel Map: The applicant has filed an application for 4 parcel subdivision of real property. Currently, the overall project area is made up of 1 parcel totaling 28.4 acres of land. The project includes the subdivision of the 28.4 acre site into 4 parcels: Parcels 1 and 2 for the two restaurants, Parcel 3 for the hotel, and Parcel 4 for the residential area. D. Tentative Tract Map: The applicant has filed a Tentative Tract Map application for a subdivision of air space to create residential condominiums for the 380 units (329 attached units and 51 single-family detached units). The condominium map will create market rate, for -sale condominium units. E. Circulation and Site Planning: The applicant has designed the project so that access will be from three points: one on Base Line Road that will be signalized and align with the driveway to the future Stater Brothers neighborhood center at the northwest corner of Base Line Road and Day Creek Boulevard; one right -in and right -out off Day Creek Boulevard; and one signalized entry off Day Creek Boulevard that will align with the existing signal at Madrigal Place. The primary access point off Day Creek Boulevard will feature a drive aisle that utilizes decorative pavement with a landscaped median that is framed by trees on either side. The project is also designed with an emergency vehicle access point along Day Creek Boulevard south of the signalized entrance at Madrigal Place. P396 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00508 AND DRC2016-00451 — DR NORTON June 14, 2017 Page 7 F. Mixed Use Concept and Urban Design Features: When the General Plan was adopted in 2010, the primary goal of mixed use areas was to create unique places within a suburban environment that are of higher intensity and density that the surrounding area, and integrate commercial, residential and other compatible uses into a project design that is cohesive and interconnected. The project includes several paseos and gathering areas that will facilitate interaction and connectivity to the project. The primary plaza in the residential area features a raised staged area and lounge area raised seat walls. This plaza is connected to the residential area with a shaded pedestrian walk, and also provides a walkable connection to the hotel. The plaza area is intentionally designed to offer areas that are able to accommodate a variety of uses that promote community and interaction within a livable project, such as art and craft displays, conversation areas, entertainment, community readings, outdoor reading areas, social nodes and outdoor dining. The plaza at the corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road has been designed as a publicly accessible focal point. The plaza will be shared by the two restaurants and will feature a central fountain, decorative paving, accent trees, overhead trellis structures, colored concrete and an architectural tower that pedestrians can pass through and will offer a usable public space and feature outdoor dining. In order to provide a continuity with the existing single-family neighborhood along the south, five single-family condo units along Day Creek Boulevard have been plotted with a rear -on orientation. The site planning for the balance of the project for the townhomes along Day Creek and Base Line, restaurants at the corner and the hotel along Day Creek intentionally utilizes closer street setbacks than are normally permitted under standard Development Regulations; however, for Mixed Use Districts, the Development Code provides for reduced street setbacks to intentionally create an urban street edge and encourage engagement with active street frontages. The townhomes are designed with patios that front -on to Day Creek and Base Line Road, thereby promoting pedestrian connections to the street, walking, cycling and use of the nearby Pacific Electric Trail via Day Creek Boulevard. Consistent with the goals of Mixed Use Districts to foster a walkable built environment, the project will offer opportunities to walk to neighborhood shopping centers, convenient access to Omnitrans bus routes (Route 67 off Base Line Road and Route 82 off Church Street), bike routes (Day Creek Channel, Pacific Electric Trail, Day Creek and Base Line), and enhanced pedestrian sidewalks along Day Creek Boulevard. In meeting the design goas of the Mixed Use District and with substantial input from the community, the site includes construction of a privately maintained but publicly accessible linear park along the south edge. The park will provide recreational opportunities for not only the residents at Day Creek Square, but also all residents within walking distance. The linear park will not only provide residents an opportunity to exercise, but will encourage residents to make connections in their community and provide opportunities to "have eyes on the street" in their community. The park will feature open turf areas for low intensity activities (frisbee, badminton, volleyball, ball throwing), bench areas, shaded areas with game tables, dual bocce ball courts, and a pedestrian plaza with seating. The park also is consistent with Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) as the park will feature security cameras to discourage crime. These cameras will be required to connect to the Public Video Safety Network. The San Bernardino County PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT P397 DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00508 AND DRC2016-00451 — DR HORTON June 14, 2017 Page 8 Sheriff's Department has reviewed and provided input that was incorporated in the final park site plan as well. G. Setbacks: As discussed above, the Development Code provides for reduced streetscape setbacks for mixed use projects in order to create a connection with the active street edge and provide a functional pedestrian connection. Setbacks are determined at the following formula: 50-75% of the standard streetscape setback. Base Line Road and Day Creek Boulevard are classified as Major Divided Arterials. Accordingly, the minimum building setbacks (measured from ultimate curb face) are the following for each land use type: 1. Detached single-family: 11.25 to 22.5 feet. 2. Attached single-family/multifamily: 11.25 to 22.5 feet. 3. Commercial: 11.25 to 22.5 feet. All of the project's proposed setbacks are in compliance with the standards for mixed use projects. Along Base Line Road the setbacks range from 13 to 23 feet for the hotel, 14 to 17 feet for the restaurant, and 22 feet for the attached townhomes. Along Day Creek Boulevard, the setback for the restaurant is 21 feet, the attached townhomes are plotted from 18 to 21 feet from the curb, and the detached single-family condos are plotted from 24 to 31 feet from the curb. H. Design Review: The Design Review entitlement includes the review of the detailed site plan, residential and commercial architecture and landscape palette for the project. The residential portion of the project is designed with 4 residential product types: 1) three types of three-story rowhomes (Villages A, B and C) and 2) a two-story, single-family product that is plotted along the southern edge near the existing single-family neighborhood (Village D). Village A features three floor plans featuring two or three bedrooms that range from 1,279 square feet to 1,474 square feet with a two -car garage (conventional or tandem). The two bedroom product has been paired with the tandem garages as the Development Code requires 1.5 spaces for two bedroom townhomes, of which 1 space must be in a garage or carport. Village B features two or three bedrooms that range from 1,549 square feet to 1,862 square feet with all units having a conventional (side-by-side) two -car garage. Village C is the largest of the rowhome concept and is designed with two or three bedrooms that range from 1,854 square feet to 2,202 square feet with all units having a conventional two -car garage. Village D is comprised of single- family detached condominiums. The single-family detached product are all two-story, range from 2,177 square feet to 2,333 square feet, are designed with either 4 or 5 bedrooms and include conventional two -car garages. Residential Architecture: The residential architecture of the project is designed utilizing four village themes that provide a variety of housing types, create visual interest and fulfill the requirements of providing 360 -degree architecture to all buildings and plans. Village A: The architecture of the rowhomes for Village A is Craftsman -inspired, featuring board and batten siding, shingle siding, wood braces, horizontal siding and Craftsman - inspired windows and some garage doors reflecting Craftsman elements. Roof material is P398 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00508 AND DRC2016-00451 — DR HORTON June 14, 2017 Page 9 concrete flat tile. Village A also incorporates a showing of urban Craftsman influences, utilizing a metal awning with cable support on the 6B and 7B Elevations. Village B: The architecture of the rowhomes for Village B is Craftsman -inspired, utilizing additional elements that reflect an urban Craftsman design. Design elements include awnings with standing seam metal roofs, brick veneers and tower features. Traditional Craftsman elements include board and batten siding, shingle siding, wood braces, horizontal siding and Craftsman -inspired windows and some garage doors exhibiting Craftsman -inspired features. Some units have decks on both the front and rear elevations. Roof material is concrete flat tile. Village C: The architecture for Village C exhibits both Craftsman and Adobe features, blending the two styles appropriately. The exterior materials palette includes horizontal wood siding, board and batten siding, awnings, exposed beams and accent features in the wall plane. The wall planes are designed with both vertical and horizontal articulation, featuring balconies and roof decks. Consistent with the architectural style, the roof planes are gently sloped, Village D: Village D is designed with single-family detached condominiums. There are a total of three floor plans, and each plan is designed with four architectural styles: Craftsman, Santa Barbara, Shingle and Italianate. The Craftsman design utilizes stacked stone, horizontal siding, Craftsman -inspired doors and windows and wood braces. The roof material is concrete flat tile. The Santa Barbara style includes concrete "S" the roofs, corbels, fabric awnings, decorative metal railings and decorative the vents. The Shingle style is designed with stacked stone, shingle siding, shutters, corbels and a flat concrete tile roof. The Italianate design includes decorative corbels under the eaves, shutters, plaster recess, and concrete tile "S" roofs. Amenities: The Development Code requires a total of seven recreational amenities for a 380 -unit residential project. As proposed, the project is providing a total of 9 amenities, comprised of six passive areas and three active amenities. The passive amenities are designed for sitting, reading, conversation and outdoor eating, and include two plazas, three outdoor seating/lounge areas and one paseo with a connecting walkway trail near the core of the project that links one plaza and one seating area. The primary plaza in the residential area features a retractable movie screen, raised staged area, a lounge area, colored concrete with medallion and pavers, and raised seat walls. One plaza has a dual age tot lot, picnic tables and low walls that define the space. Two of the outdoor lounge areas are designed with suspended lighting, steel patterned screen walls, planter areas, low walls, and I -beams that will frame each seating area. For active amenities, the project is designed with three areas for physical activity: 1) pool/spa/cabana area; 2) linear park and 3) double bocce court. The pool/spa area will feature outdoor dining areas, barbeques, large potted plants, trees and a restroom building. The park will feature open turf areas for low intensity activities (frisbee, badminton, volleyball, ball throwing), bench areas, shaded areas with game tables, dual bocce ball courts, and a pedestrian plaza with seating. Although the linear park will be PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT P399 DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00508 AND DRC2016-00451 — DR HORTON June 14, 2017 Page 10 privately maintained, it will be accessible to the public. Within the project area, another set of double bocce courts feature shade and poured in place colored concrete seat walls. K. Commercial Architecture: The architecture, scale and massing of the hotel building and two restaurants are designed to compliment the residential villages. Restaurant Buildings: The architectural vocabulary for the restaurant buildings is Santa Barbara inspired. Exterior features and materials include arches, tile insets, tile roofs, colonnades, recessed niches, awnings, curvilinear elements, and fenestration choices that enhance visual interest. Roof top equipment will be screened by the parapets. Each restaurant is 6,000 square feet, and the height of each building is 25 feet. Both restaurants are designed with a covered outdoor dining area. Hotel: Complimenting the restaurant buildings, the hotel evokes Santa Barbara -inspired design. Key architectural features include awnings, tile insets, ceramic tile elements, curvilinear parapets, French doors, decorative wood siding at key locations, medallions, exposed rafters, plaster trim and a wood trellis. The height of the hotel is 44 feet. L. Landscape: Landscape standards for mixed use projects are governed by a combination of standards from the Mixed Use District and standards from Residential Districts for multi- family projects. For landscape calculations, the density for the project equates to 13.4 dwelling units/acre based upon the entire 28.4 acre project area. Per Section 17.56.070 of the Development Code, the following are the landscape standards for projects with density ranges between 14-24 units/acre: 45 trees per gross acre shall be planted, with the following percentages of sizes: 10% shall be 36 -inch box or larger; 10% shall be 24 -inch box or larger; and 80% shall be 15 -gallon size. Mixed Use projects require that 10% of the overall net area be landscaped. For the residential area, 19.3 acres are allocated to multi -family product, and 5.5 acres to single-family product. The project has 87 24 -inch box trees, 87, 36 -inch box trees and 745, 15 -gallon size trees, for a grand total of 919 trees, exceeding the minimum requirement of 871 trees (45 x 19.36 acres). For required landscape area, the minimum requirement is 2.84 acres (10%), and the project is providing 4.57 acres of landscape area. For all landscape standards (tree sizes and landscape area), the project either meets or exceeds the minimum standards. M. Private Open Space Analysis: The Development Code requires that the attached townhome product provide a minimum of 150 square feet of open space per unit, with a minimum depth of 6 feet. Open space may be provide in the form of decks or balconies. All of the townhome units comply with these requirements. The Code does not specify an open space requirement for the single-family detached condominium units; however, all units will have a modest rear yard that will provide private yard areas. N. Parkinq Analysis: For the commercial uses (hotel and 2 restaurant pads), the project is designed with 193 stalls, meeting the required amount (120 stalls for the restaurant and 73 for the hotel). Although the Development Code permits Mixed Use projects to count tandem parking towards meeting the required parking calculation, the project is not eligible to count the second stall in the 49 tandem garage units as the garages do not meet the required depth (40' required; 36-8" proposed). In order to meet the 2 spaces per unit PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2016-00452. SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032. DRC2016-00450 DRC2016-00449. DRC2016-00508 AND DRC2016-00451 — DR HORTON June 14, 2017 Page 11 requirement. (1 space required in garage or carport), for 2 bedroom tandem unit. the applicant has provided 49 surface stalls. In total for all uses, the project requires 1,080 stalls, and 1,095 are provided. As indicated in Table A, the project has 15 surplus spaces. Parking study In accordance with Section 17.64.060(D), a parking study was prepared by the applicants consultant (Urban Crossroads) to demonstrate adequate parking. The parking study verified the land uses, applied ratios and calculations. The parking study validated the conclusion that adequate parking exists based upon the required ratios in the Code. TABLE A P400 of Number Code Standard Bedrooms of Units Required Covered Parking Total Required Parking Spaces Total Provided SpacesNumber Parking Two Bedroom 2 Spaces/Unit Units 94 (1 Garage or Carport)94 spaces 235 188 470 102 188 Three Bedroom 2 Spaces/Unit Units 235 (2 in Garage or Carport) 470 Single Family 51 2 Car Garage 102 spaces 102 Guest Parking 235 1 per 3 units 127 142 Subtotal: Residential Parking 887 902 Surplus +15 Hotel (71 rooms) 73 73 Two Restaurants (12,000 sq. ft total) 120 120 Subtotal: Commercial 193 193 Surplus/deficit 0 Totals 1,080 1,095 Surplus/deficit +15 O. Conditional Use Permit: The applicant has submitted a Conditional Use Permit application for a Type 70 ABC License (On Sale General — Restrictive Service). This type of ABC License authorizes the sale of beer, wine, and distilled spirits for consumption on the premises to the establishment's overnight occupancy guests and their invitees. This type of license is common and accepted business practice for hotels, and is often used in conjunction with a complimentary happy hour. This request is compatible with the hospitality use, and because of its restrictive nature, will not cause adverse impacts on the adjacent land uses. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT P401 DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00508 AND DRC2016-00451 — DR HORTON June 14, 2017 Page 12 P. Minor Exception: By necessity, the project includes walls that are over the 6 -foot maximum height limit because of two unique site constraints: 1) an approximate 4-5 foot grade differential that results from an upslope condition that occurs along the project's west boundary; 2) the necessity to lower pad elevations in some areas by up to 4.5 feet because of the elevation control point of matching the existing grade along the south edge in order minimize visual impacts to the existing neighborhood. This results in a challenging engineering constraint as the site falls by approximately 37 feet from the north to south and this grade differential has to be made up throughout the project while being in compliance with drive aisle gradients, pad elevation control points and drainage protocols. The applicant has submitted a Minor Exception to permit an up to 8 -foot high combination perimeter wall along the western property line. The findings of facts below support the necessary findings, which are required by the City's Development Code: Finding: The Minor Exception is consistent with the General Plan or any applicable specific plan or development agreement. Fact: The proposed wall height increase is necessary due to design constraints between project site and existing adjacent property. Specifically, the increase in wall height is necessary because of a 4-5 foot upslope condition at the western property line and the design of the project to match grades along the south property line. Matching the grades along the south property line demonstrates sensitivity to the existing residences to the south, exhibiting desirable site planning. 2. Finding: The proposed development is compatible with the existing and proposed land uses in the surrounding area. Fact: The proposed project is compatible with the surrounding land uses as the project site is within the Mixed Use District and will permit the development of multi- family residential structures. Additionally, combination retaining and garden wall heights over 6 feet are common where site and grading constraints justify additional wall heights 3. Finding: The proposed exception to the specific development standard(s) is necessary to allow creative design solutions compatible with the desires of the community and/or to accommodate unique site conditions. Fact: There is significant grade difference and slope conditions between the project site and the property to the west. The additional wall height along the west property line will allow the project to be constructed in a manner that provides for a privacy barrier and safety barrier on both sides of the project while concurrently accommodating the significant grade differential. 4. Finding: The granting of the Minor Exception will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district and will not be detrimental to public health safety or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvement in the vicinity. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT P402 DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00508 AND DRC2016-00451 — DR HORTON June 14, 2017 Page 13 Fact: There is significant grade difference and slope gradient between the project site and the property to the west. It is common practice to permit additional wall heights where site constraints and existing grade differentials justify additional wall heights between adjacent properties. The increased wall height will not negatively impact the surrounding property owners as the wall will be of decorative material and of similar height and materials as other walls in the area. Q. Uniform Siqn Program: The applicant has submitted a Uniform Sign Program for the project in order to provide a cohesive sign architecture for the hotel, two restaurants and project entry signage for the residential portion. Commercial signage: The monument signs (one on Day Creek and one on Base Line) are designed to match stucco color and texture of the hotel and restaurant buildings. The signs also feature tile roofs and recessed tile to match the hotel and restaurant buildings. The sign height and area are compliant with the Development Code regulations. Each restaurant includes provisions for two wall signs, all of which are compliant with the area and quantity requirements. Residential project identification signs: The project includes a 6 -foot high project identification sign at the primary entry off Day Creek Boulevard. The sign will have adjacent landscaping, and is designed with pinned steel letters attached to 24" x 48" stone/tile veneer walls. Illumination will be backlight and the height and sign area meet the Code requirements. R. Design Review Committee: The project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (DRC) (Macias, Wimberly and Smith) on April 18, 2017. Staff raised several issues regarding adding additional architectural materials to Villages A and D in order to meet the City's 360 degree architecture requirement, and that all garage doors should be appropriate to the design theme, complimenting the selected architectural theme of the buildings. The applicant agreed to implement all of the design enhancements recommended by staff. The DRC recommended that the project move forward to the Planning Commission subject to the design recommendations of staff. Since the DRC meeting, the applicant has submitted updated plans to staff, and the final plan set incorporates all of the requested changes. S. Technical Review Committee: The project was reviewed and approved by the Technical Review Committee (TRC) on April 18, 2017. T. Neighborhood Meeting #1: DR Horton conducted a neighborhood meeting on Wednesday, August 24, 2016 at Victoria Windrows Elementary School at 6855 Victoria Park Lane, from 6:30 p.m. to 8:30 p.m. for the proposed project. Approximately 60-65 people attended the meeting. DR Horton presented an overview of the project, which was then followed by a question and answer period. City Planning staff attended the meeting and were available for questions. The meeting lasted approximately two hours, generated substantial community input and residents raised a variety of concerns regarding the PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT P403 DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00508 AND DRC2016-00451 — DR HORTON June 14, 2017 Page 14 proposed project. The issues raised by the residents at the meeting are summarized below: Hotel: Residents did not feel the hotel is a compatible land use in a predominately residential, neighborhood commercial area. Residents stated that hotels belong at Victoria Gardens or on Foothill Boulevard. Residents were also concerned about crime and other activities occurring at the hotel that are undesirable. 2. Project density along the south edge and park along the south edge: Residents indicated that both the density and type of product along the south edge for the proposed project should match their neighborhood. Residents wanted to see single- family detached product that matches the plotting of their neighborhood, not side on single-family with minimal setbacks. Residents also indicated that their neighborhood is currently underserved by neighborhood parks that are within a walkable distance that do not require crossing of a major arterial. For a 28 -acre project, residents indicated that the developer should be directed to study the viability of dedicating a minimum of 2 acres within the project area for a public park. Note: The nearest park, Victoria Arbors Park, across Day Creek Boulevard, is approximately'/2 mile away. 3. Inadequate project parking/crime: Residents from the single-family neighborhood to the south expressed substantial concern their neighborhood will be impacted by cars parking on the streets from the proposed project. Currently, the residential neighborhood to the south is experiencing vehicles parking on the streets from the residential development at the SWC of Day Creek Boulevard and Church Street. Additionally, the neighborhood along the south boundary of the proposed project has recently faced multiple mailbox robberies, and residents feel that there is a correlation between the crimes and vehicles coming in to their neighborhood from other areas. 4. Setbacks: Residents from the neighborhood to the south strongly expressed that the project's setbacks along the south edge are not adequate. Existing rear yard setbacks average approximately 35 feet for the neighborhood to the south. Residents indicated that single-family product along the south edge must match the setbacks of their community. 5. Additional Single -Family Units: Residents to the east, across Day Creek, would like to see single-family homes plotted along Day Creek Boulevard, not townhomes. Residents indicated that the Day Creek frontage should match the streetscape on the east side of Day Creek with single-family homes. 6. Overall Density: Residents from the neighborhood to the south noted that project is too dense. The neighborhood to the south is built at 4.8 du/acre. Residents did not offer a specific acceptable density for the overall project, but stressed again that the southerly density range of the % of the project site should be very close to their neighborhood. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT P404 DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00508 AND DRC2016-00451 — DR HORTON June 14, 2017 Page 15 7. Privacy: Residents from the neighborhood to the south were very concerned that with DR Horton's project having 18-22 foot setbacks along the south edge, their privacy into their bedrooms and back yards will be compromised. U. Neighborhood Meeting #2: The applicant conducted a second neighborhood meeting on Monday, March 27, 2017 at Etiwanda Gardens at 7576 Etiwanda Avenue from 6:30 to 8:00 p.m. DR Horton made a presentation of the project updates in response to the issues raised at Neighborhood Meeting #1. The project team from DR Horton, City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning and Engineering Department staff and the Sheriff's Department attended the meeting and were available for questions. Below is a summary of the key issues raised at the meeting, along with a response to the issue and any applicable updates from issues raised from Neighborhood Meeting #1. Land use/hotel: Several residents continued to indicate that the hotel is not a compatible land use in a predominately residential, neighborhood commercial area. Residents stated that hotels sometimes are locations for illegal activities, and that hotels are better suited along Foothill Boulevard. Residents were also concerned about crime and other activities occurring at the hotel that are undesirable. Response: A Sheriff's deputy attended the neighborhood meeting and indicated that the police have not seen significant increase or correlation in crime associated with hotels in the City. The Sheriff's deputy indicated that the deputies are available to work with hotel management and provide training on how to proactively prevent undesirable and illicit uses that could occur. Regarding building massing and scale compatibility, City staff commented that the hotel's height, scale and location is compatible with the proposed three-story townhomes, and that the hotel is located on the frontage of a major divided arterial, facing a commercial center. 2. Project density, additional single family and increased setback along the south edge: Some residents indicated that the overall density of the project is too high and that more single-family homes should be plotted. Residents did not offer up a specific acceptable density for the overall project. A few residents indicated that the proposed setback of the single-family homes along the south edge is not adequate and the rear yard setbacks should be the same or greater as the houses in the subdivision to the south. Response: The applicant indicated that it is important to reminder that the project is a mixed use, not a single family development, and that the proposed density is common to mixed use projects. 3. Inadequate project parking: Some residents expressed concern if the project is parked adequately. Response: As proposed, the project exceeds the required amount of parking by approximately 15 stalls. The applicant further indicated that they are exploring the possibility of utilizing the commercial parking during specific time periods (after the PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT P405 DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00508 AND DRC2016-00451 — DR HORTON June 14, 2017 Page 16 restaurants close/prior to opening) as a means to provide supplemental parking for the residential areas. 4. Linear park: Residents indicated appreciation of the developer's effort's to provide a park. Some residents expressed concerned over the park's small size (.75 acre), narrow width, lack of an adequate area for active recreation and concerns over potential noise and crime issues. Response: The developer presented a revised site plan that indicates a linear park along the south edge. The developer indicated that efforts were taken to provide a low intensity impact yet publicly accessible park. The developer indicated that the design goal of the park was to minimize potential noise impacts by providing exercise stations, walking paths and shade. City staff added that the main idea behind the park was to provide a buffer zone between the project and the single-family homes to the south in response to issues raised at the first community meeting. The developer stated that they are willing to continue to modify the design to include amenities that would be the best fit for the community. The Sheriff's deputy indicated that the installation of public safety cameras might also be possible, which would augment public safety. A condition of approval is included requiring the installation of cameras and a connection to the public video safety network. V. Neighborhood Meeting #3: The applicant conducted a third neighborhood meeting on Wednesday, May 17, 2017, at Carlton P. Lightfoot Elementary at 6989 Kenyon Way from from 6:30 to 8:00 p.m. Approximately 10 residents attended the meeting. DR Horton made a final presentation of the project indicating the final site plan. The applicant noted the final design of the linear park, which incorporates a substantial amount of community input and features open turf areas for low intensity activities, bench areas, shaded areas with game tables, dual bocce ball courts, and a pedestrian plaza with seating. The project team from DR Horton, City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning and Engineering Department staff and the Sheriff's Department attended the meeting and were available for questions. At the meeting there were no new issues raised by the residents that were not previously brought forth at Neighborhood Meetings #1 and #2. One resident asked if it would be possible if the developer would be willing to provide native landscape plant materials and large, native canopy shade trees, such as Sycamores or Oaks, in the linear park. The resident also inquired if the developer would be willing to provide a pedestrian connection along the west side of the property that would connect with the Regional Trail System along Day Creek Channel. The developer indicated that he would direct his landscape architect to study the viability of the landscape, canopy trees and trail connection request. W. Tribal Notification: California State Bill 18 (SB18) requires that the City send project notification to California tribal communities when a project proposes a General Plan or Specific Plan Amendment. California Assembly Bill 52 (AB52) requires that the City send project notification to interested California tribal communities when a project requires an Environmental Impact Report, Mitigated Negative Declaration or Negative Declaration. In conformance with California State Bill 18, staff contacted the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) for a list of Tribal Communities to provide notice to regarding the PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT P4O6 DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00508 AND DRC2016-00451 — DR HORTON June 14, 2017 Page 17 opportunity to consult since the project has an associated Community Plan Amendment. The NAHC responded with a list of 12 Tribes. Along with a CHRIS Report, staff sent a Tribal Consultation Request on July 13, 2016, for the proposed Community Plan Amendment to the following Tribal Communities: Gabrieleno/ Tongva Nation, Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians, Serrano Nation of Mission Indians, Moronga Band of Mission Indians, San Manuel Band of Mission Indians, Morongo Band of Mission Indians, Gabrieleno/Tongva Nation, Gabrieleno/ Tonga San Gabriel Band of Mission Indians, San Fernando Band of Mission Indians, Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians, San Manuel Band of Mission Indians and Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation. Of the 12 Tribes who were notified, none requested that consultation commence. In conformance with Assembly Bill 52 (AB52), staff sent a Tribal Consultation Request on October 4, 2016, of the proposed project to the following Tribal Communities who had requested to be notified: San Manuel Band of Mission Indians, Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians and the Torres Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians. Following the prescribed timelines for AB52, staff did not receive any requests for consultation. X. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQK) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. In order to adequately evaluate potential environmental impacts from the project, 15 focused reports were prepared by consultants from multiple fields, including, but not limited to, air quality, biological resources, focused biological reports for plants, birds, mammals, reptiles, peer review of focused biological reports, cultural and paleontological resources, greenhouse gas, traffic and noise. The peer review of all four of the biological focused reports affirmed the conclusions in the reports. A comprehensive discussion of the environmental impacts and any necessary mitigation measures is in the Initial Study Parts II and III. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures related to air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, geology and soils, greenhouse gas emissions, hazards and waste materials, hydrology and water quality, noise, public services, transportation/traffic, and tribal cultural resources, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation measures for the project. FISCAL IMPACT/REVENUE ANALYSIS: In order to ensure that the project does not adversely impact revenues to the City's General Fund, and that that the proposed project's annual costs for providing public services do not exceed revenues generated, a Fiscal Impact Analysis was completed by Development Planning and Financing Group (July 2016). This revenue/cost analysis is especially critical since the project includes a Victoria Community Plan Amendment to change the zoning from Regionally Related Office/Commercial to Mixed Use. For the analysis, it is populated with two scenarios: 1) No zone change, and developing the site under the existing zoning, floor area ratios with a 163,350 square feet of commercial use and 392,000 square feet of office use; and 2) an analysis of the proposed mixed use project by DR Horton. For Scenario 1, it is estimated that a proposed retail/office project would generate PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT P407 DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00508 AND DRC2016-00451 — DR HORTON June 14, 2017 Page 18 $788,000 in annual reoccurring revenue, and $334,000 in reoccurring costs, resulting in a net fiscal positive impact to the City of $454,000. For Scenario 2, it is estimated that the proposed mixed use project would generate $691,000 in annual reoccurring revenue, and $215,000 in reoccurring costs, resulting in a net fiscal positive impact to the City of $476,000. The net impact to the City is positive under both land use scenarios, and the analysis demonstrates that reoccurring General Fund revenues generated by the project will be sufficient to cover all reoccurring General Fund Costs. FISCAL IMPACT/PROPERTY TAX AND IMPACT FEES: The project site currently is assessed an annual property tax. A percentage of this annual tax is shared with the City. The proposed development will increase the value of the project site and the City's annual share of the property tax will increase accordingly. The project proponent also will be responsible for paying one-time impact fees. These fees are intended to address the increased demand for City services due to the proposed project. The following types of services that these impact fees would support include the following: library services, transportation infrastructure, drainage infrastructure, animal services, police, parks, and community and recreation services. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Although a specific current City Council goal does not apply to the project, the project is consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan and the objectives of the Development Code. Additionally, the project will meet two ongoing objectives of the City Council: 1) AUGMENT PUBLIC SAFETY: The linear park will be constructed with cameras that will connect to the Public Video Safety Network. This use of technology will enable greater monitoring of public areas and discourage crime and nuisance activities. 2) GENERAL PLAN IMPLEMENTATION: As analyzed in prior sections, the proposed project includes a Victoria Community Plan Amendment. This legislative action will implement the goals of the General Plan to achieve a mixed use project at this location that was envisioned since 2001 as the highest and best use of the land. The land use amendment will change the zoning from Regionally Related Office/Commercial to Mixed Use and will bring the zoning of the Victoria Community Plan into vertical consistency with the General Plan and facilitate a mixed use project, thereby implementing General Plan Policy LU -2.1 by providing mixed use projects and high density residential areas at strategic infill locations. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 1,000 -foot radius of the project site. To date, staff has received some written items of public correspondence (Exhibit O), applicant's response to public correspondence (Exhibit P), and staff fielded approximately 8-10 phone calls regarding general comments, questions and information regarding the entitlement review process. The project information was also posted on the City's website for public viewing. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT P408 DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00508 AND DRC2016-00451 — DR HORTON June 14, 2017 Page 19 EXHIBITS: Exhibit A — Master Title Sheet/Project Data Sheet Exhibit B — Village A Architecture Plans Exhibit C — Village B Architecture Plans Exhibit D — Village C Architecture Plans Exhibit E — Village D Architecture Plans Exhibit F — Garage and Front Door Variation Plans Exhibit G — Accessory Structure Plans Exhibit H — Commercial Buildings Exhibit I — Civil Improvement, Fire Access and Phasing Plans Exhibit J — Landscape Plans Exhibit K — Design Review Committee Agenda & Action Agenda for April 18, 2017 Exhibit L — Existing Victoria Community Plan Zoning Exhibit Exhibit M — Proposed Victoria Community Zoning Exhibit Exhibit N — Initial Study Parts I, II, and III Exhibit O — Public Correspondence Exhibit P — Applicant Response to Public Comments Exhibit Q — Applicant Supplemental Vegetation Analysis dated May 25, 2017 Draft Resolution Recommending Approval of Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRC2016-00452 Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19762 Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20032 Draft Resolution of Approval for Design Review DRC2016-00450 Draft Resolution of Approval for Conditional Use Permit DRC2016-00449 Draft Resolution of Approval for Minor Exception DRC2016-00508 Draft Resolution of Approval for Uniform Sign Program DRC2016-00451 CB:DG/Is Q D Pc. 6, ley /aoi� EXHIBIT A X w 0 Z 1-- w w CO P409 N MIU r Q w x 4 ySi1, 31 + 31; �, 3 .11.�14i111l��i:�i�: W J r aN, U, Z a P409 N MIU 2 QLU 1 t ULU Ix T§+1i' 1.33;' 7=• � ,i7==} r Q w x 4 W J ba aN, U, Z a L w LU 2 QLU 1 t ULU Ix T§+1i' 1.33;' 7=• � ,i7==} Yn3n. .Oma � O� g o� Q 4 aN, U, Z Z U 8 �. A\.,o 1 � 2 QLU 1 t ULU Ix T§+1i' 1.33;' 7=• � ,i7==} 1 . .r +' • 1 � I . � f 1 I t 1 a 1 1 1 , 1, i :. 1 .. 1 1 1 1• 1 • i ' •i r lit iii Eii:. � � ?i3ri: f uti . .r +' • 1 � I . � f 1 I t 1 a J , 1, i :. _ • .. 1• 1 ' •i lit iii Eii:. � � ?i3ri: f uti � 'zil 1 1. 0 t t t r id .: 1 X,5till lit iii Eii:. � � ?i3ri: f uti � 'zil 1 X,5till EXHIBIT B 3-4 I (D Z 0 D C) 0 3: C) Z U- 0 C) Z 0 0 I X CO W W o' s 0 W z w LU ) W RINH f 1, IN I al. I U) y3lififf", lir P411 CO W CL o' s 0 W O LU ) P411 CL I& 5; P411 u. 0 N i I I 3- I LC r N f _ 7. IX,5V LO m U- 0 cry Z 5 CL P413 to 2 LL O IT N�lBdpl a f f� IX,SEI In co U- 0 M P415 .-C In 2 U- 0 W-1 2'! d F -7--r 7 FIF-970F�71 rrl �l -7M'7-.lF-77 I X, 5 11.1 CY) LL o aw cn 2 P417 v,K to En LL O m 2 W CA g�g a g L 06 U) 8 Q � LU W 0 v J 2 i ws Q i U Y a W Ug } 1 XI S LO m U- 0 O m iz510. C Lo cn u. 0 0 Z X, Kill P421 -C LO cl) u- 0 I P422 z Ow W W - In cr) LL o d F 717 P423 P424 m (Y) L'L h h s e % c 1 0 z 71 u V) z 0 Wb' A 0M x LU 2 o1! 1 1 z 0 F- U) 9 co 9 LU > LLILU cr 0 P425 co 'a N In A LL O r I z KI -I P427 co m It O a W �4w1 n gra i LE C � I - I WFJ3■ Z K - co U- O co Z 5 a In m U- 0 rn i LU D Q� x� �s } Ir i O¢ U) 3 co 8 wW O� g J W 9 Ug Yo LU W Y CE e Ug } X, P4:'. P430 Lo cn LL O O N E e t 2 ws 0 I F— g cr �. Oo of8 m 8 c qQLU 5i J¢F �6. o Will 11 will 1 i ill 2 W P431 IZ :t T 71" 2 LU ol z A 06 I-- wo cn . co 8 Yo i. LU LU w Et e P432 P433 cn LL P434 m 0 P435 V) V) LL 0 LLt N U1 Z o W w4 w � � K w .. F X W P435 U) co U- 0 N P436 0 Ln cn U- 0 r,- 04 P437 P438 P439 to cn U- 0 cn 6 IX, El [Ill f�� LLJ u > \i i 010 cn IX, El [Ill z 0 LL to z Ix >bjj U�l L�Ll ? dLuk� (r RS R; F 1 777— P441 LO CO LL 0 N m P442 Q D EXHIBIT C 1 r� V Z O5 U z O U F— (Y- 0 = oo O U Z LL O F— C) X W 0 Z_ w w J QLU f (� •8 ! i8 ' '�f i 7 Wni 3 cn0 P443 ? LL, of i Q g NN � ♦— 's� 4 H �pyy yr W: 1�rvn33MB 1.33b] ♦rG B� S� o � U q;, , I t _ QLU f (� •8 ! i8 ' '�f i 7 Wni 3 cn0 P443 3m3nr rwrbu3 ' `y ,` O� CL g NN � Z� 1�rvn33MB 1.33b] ♦rG B� S� I QLU f (� •8 ! i8 ' '�f i 7 Wni 3 cn0 P443 N y. d' X19 O9 H r cn6 co < .6 o N mg LLI g=� !�R W � a It ch o LIJ wQ U3 } u Qg P444 Ji � R � ffi ON � S Cn d N e 8 me wI gw�g J 8 waa js1 N o `1 iW w a 0 YS2 Qg P445 m N T IT � R � ffi o l � m M 6 N o IZEl1:1 CD cn U- 0 M P447 F C U l`9 a N 0 fD 8 LLI _j J u W gd IL' 3 Q :3 8 tG $ Wg LLJ o U � Y �y D � L �! \\ , F-77-77- - 7 a 7o o 0 § , \ & ±car u2�| zOL`! 7 fnco q # o LU Em±; <F -W CL < L) k § m \ ±§ IX, El N co U- c _A S o �- 8: rn M 6 rm I X, El Vol r_ ---_j ij I r II I .5 :a I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I E— I I I I. L I U- 0 m Z 5 gra a�w gra m1 P450 V 9 3 A A N I T P451 Cl) 0 0 X W WZ - - w CL W§g C6 CrA w X 7W 7 z 0 LU cr m U- 0 o u-, t 0 LL a. LU6 mg LU P452 P453 cn U- 0 .FR I OR i-- s cnS 07 1 N a i 3 g COLLI gW J � W Q � E U o Y W w e Ui D U- 0 CN S m4 i Lcl MIUL o FTI - F�i ..". I,, 00 2; ol Fil n'; P454 co U- 0 g o l en g (o i N 0 P455 P456 CD co U- 0 ______________� I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I - I - �___1 1 1 I _ _ I 1 I - - - �— --- -- ----- I =_ I I__--__ I � I H 1 I _ - I - r ---J t I - I I I — ................... ......r _ J I � I _ I I I ` I I I I I — I � I — I I I . I I _ I a r I I - I I I I — I. I I z 0 LLI Z 0 Ir LL 0 ce) N P457 W-1 0 ce) N P457 7- x m cn U- 0 ED 2f 71'. r 0 i F- 8: rn Cl) N a 8 -, P458 CD m U- 0 P459 P460 a. 7 0 F-7 7 M-- 7 -7 m -,l 7:1 0 11 U3 N wo P461 rol LL 0 0 N Z a P462 N T— r Z m CD m U- 0 z a O U W N m �gffi o a r S cn < N a 3 mg LLJ gw J � W g� U Y W W o U� O� P463 N r r N M U- 0 N N P464 LL 0 co N I I I I I I L I I I I' I I I I I I I I I I r ' I I I -1 T -4T --------, I I I � I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I -- L _--- _, __—r—�______________� P465 z 0 w z 0 0: LL CD cn U- 0 CN P466 9 1 0 01 Hod --- 7777r Z 0 ON P467 U- 0 to N P468 I � I I I I I � I I I r I I I I � I I r— — — ........................, I f I I I I I 1 I I I i I I I I I L_ I I I I I f -i I I I � I I I I I I-- F- r�-- I } � I � 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -•-------- ---------------- I ------------- --------- ------ - I I II I I II II I 1 I I 1 1 I i I L__ P468 }�{�i ��" : .. !\}! )!� / 7 z 0 =I z 0 o co§ -C -a C� 0 z 0 . co 9 w LL LU LIJ LU wo e -7 It R rA U- 0 co CN 4 7 I X, mill rm i P471 m N T- 04 04 m I z yy% e cn U- _F ri 0 �w M Iz �3 •ems d 2: •, I, k ;• x 8 a� I z yy% e _F ri I z yy% m N. rt - r N co 0 x r P473 0 cn U- 0 N M IX,MI 3 Z 0 F - w Z 0 Of LL co LL0 cn (L UJI 31 I 1 .5 I P475 7 7 M7-'— 77 1- F9 I =1 1 - l' i 0 cocn e a a N § m9 w > uj 8 U3 0 o U4 }w g 8 � I X, Iril-I 07 cn U- 0 cn I z IFrA 7 i 0 2 lli"H 1, Z 0 F- LLI z 0 of LL OW P479 n _O Q EL P48O m U- 0 m cn P481 � c w Iq wk`l EXHIBIT D 0 LL 0 X W 0 Z LU LU CD < F— 9g WF— < 0 12 F— FZ LL, w )0 H 1-10111 0 Y. < w Ufa a UJ M lsi; P482 P483 I Z I Z w �bW� J a m N I 1 � I a f7H IAll� '�NNII I /gN7uM d — �- N3H]1A1 J I j 3�vtivg aoravo I I I I�-- 3oYtlY� 3'�YaY7 _ L / m p3 = I �- -- ----- ---- ------ ----- _ 1 _e s`cee� -•i- sree� _- ive a Nl`iQ I W I U- I I �� I � 1 r Ncnj �. q NW]l� N3Nyp A L j' ....... ` ` o o ui U � I rSII I I oiire IFLU L g I�� tlaMd aana I � o Y = wgUJ _ U rL dO L Q AOL EL jp L U) Y U w D LL O O xg �s x� rs �s 08 U3w UL J_ S Q g Ys wg Lu Ir U Q O P484 I I I I I I CL Jog I I I I I I I I I I I I O I I I I I I 0 Y U w 0 O O� 2S } �3 F- 8 U) C', n �I Lli Ual U! g�? >g LU <g Q= Ysl w 2 W m U } a 0 P485 i I I I I I I ' I I I � i I I I L � I I 1 1 I I I I I I I i { I I I I i 1 , , I I I I 1 1 ---------- I I I � I ----- ---Z I 1 I I I I I i I I 1 I I I I I 1 I 1 I I I I I 1 I I I I I 1 I I I I _ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I L — I I I I ' LLO I I I I I I I I I I I I II E I I I I li I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I r-----'-- I I I r - --1------I Ij I I L ----------r-- I --T-- E � i`---------- I I I � I i -- —� I I I I E> I v U- 0 Y U W O U- 0 0 0 3s �8 0g Uw C', m UL Lu u 59 J LLJ ja ¢F a' Yd wg Lu U } P486 ;;il� �{�:/ d !; \}� !} P487 0 0, P488 U - z 7, ui w 77 7 7 P.9 LU X W P488 II I T i `. I I 0 co P489 19 ca m z w 0 P490 I 2 P491 I I I I I 0' I cq �I I cn Y U LU o= wa O O xg x� It3 0 cnt co i U g�R a w o Q � � a y u Lu LU x U } Q D P492 v LL 0 P493 P494 Q D `PC 0`f ITOP EXHIBIT E 1 rQ V z O U z Z) O U O 2 OD 0 U z Q LL O U Q `;:ice fit° wi ILLI m!`'n Y LU O a :1tiZ �q6 `.liz .a i 3 e 1 [ $J55.Fi w9 �v33tlJ 5 _ 110 3 6 33P ,W I Q y WLu l'tig5 O CC �.. Y LU O a :1tiZ �q6 `.liz .a i 3 e 1 [ $J55.Fi w9 Om N W 0 L ^i W a. W bW S w R- T 3 w9 �v33tlJ 5 _ 110 3 6 33P ,W I Om N W 0 L ^i W a. W bW S w R- T v•.c T i9� • . N LL p N F 5 P496 i m 5 H LL Q' 9 U)�IN o LU 0 8 CD � s R Q3� Ds d^ � o Y g Lu M' U ¢�l0 P497 r H � I i 4 1 _._.___._.-._ _._._._._._ _.- _ _ _._ -- I._.-._._ _._._._._ -.-_- - _ _ _._ _ -- i r I I -- - I i e I I I I •. r I I I r I I ------------------ r uli N LL 0 V 0 P498 � � Ry Z - a L 0 r•= L7 ~ L � ❑ Z ❑ W 2 DDS N LL O ❑ l LL CO _ ffi ct 0 U) < NLUo 0 8 1u� R W�a a da �a LU Lu U Q� Q Z 5 a LL O O w U 2 5 a LL 0 Er CG Z 5 n LL O O w Z 5 a LL O O x N LL 0 (D of LL cn _ g 03 (n d N o 8 B. LLJU F LU g� i Q 3" S CJ U� LU Lu CE0 U o@ P500 UD z cn cn LL z 0 LU w -i cr Psol R., L (--X--I--JCE DOC WV I r N , j R" of P502 W Z Z _ cn Z _O W J W F Z O w LL N LL O QJ Z ;• ':`'?; ��' � `;iii •�'' •' „J ZGW''3 :YY:77}=:3 8iY9.'ii'.. ..1 i�i66t d O CIL•N7JL7CJL:x MlL`Ll:xl WFI.X-1 .[;MaYCACM9t_L'JC�1�'M.�fi.4x-.X l41 W F- X W P503 m CD Eme 0171, P504 d K w 0 0 LL H LL Q' 0 0 LL 0 z 0 U LU LO N LL 0 oI P505 U Z g a U- 0 O It C0 N Z a U- 0 O 2' 0 Z g a U- 0 O of In N U- 0 N P506 LEFT SIDE ELEVATION - CRAFTSMAN RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION - CRAFTSMAN L— E FRONT ELEVATION - CRAFTSMAN REAR ELEVATION - CRAFTSMAN ELEVATION KEYNOTES P507 13 OF 25 DAY CREEK SQUARE - VILLAGE D - 2 STORY SFD ` ' ' ' r I W(ILI II 1 1u+ 1 (ILI Int (lo"'O PLAN 2A APPLICANT OR NORIM22SONWIO4. WCIRCLE. SUITE 150. CORONA G WM5S51 T 5-1 " L ' ' 1• rl EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 151.'1 1.(I I.K N IlIKA I '.IN I4-1 ` 15U S.•II Y U.' o '�/IUr N! r,Ir! (IKi U U 1 (111/ /')'r 8/(,h 1!4'=1'A' _ _..w� Y1b1)]5165WPDII ONC ISSUE OATE: 5Ilb1) m m z (13 Z 0 F— LU LU z 0 cr LL R U) 7 J10. GH47 Njok! 477. Lvti 11111r,111R]; I.K.1 -Irm. M.N.1.1 LL 0 R 01 P508 LLI z z 0 LLI F - z 0 Ir .1 0 z z 0 F- LU LU 0 U) 'n N LL 0 a w P509 T to N LL 0 co is S .6t l Y66 0: o1 PSI 0 w O O LL a 2 O U W N P511 rl m coZ n a O w Lo N LL O v o1 PSI2 ,-- -fir jf - A -- - - - - Lf) 04 u. 0 sn EL 0 ll:m: 'ALWILUM-1 1"HMINUI 10-1 WN.- X.X'l .1 w X w j El 01 PSI 3 -fl R, R, co z cn O cn �o C.4 U- 0 o N M.N. 9H J- I -P -K: -mix. '131 iN:ltJ.lUl R-11.1 IN.H. .1 of P514 Ld —i CD Z_ m T Z 0 w I -- z 0 LL 1, H.Jnlmun- alrvo LA?] 11-MAIIIIA]NJ: M.M.1 ;I II -K-1 03 LL OE 04 w Lu W X P515 LU z z 0 cn LO (N LL 0 R CN t I IL ma axrp! [-Kai it 4-s 11.1 W) LL 0 N W Z U by u) Wa LU w Q z Q J Q H t 2 W J c� Z_ 2 U P517 W Q m Q CO Q z Q z L- LL Q U N LL ON � v N w z LU U U- w w w H 9 N 7 2 I I r PSI8 '6 N U - LO N T Ld Q ? e Z Q - J - - F - I --s 10. uuo nnn 9 z 5 a m U � co cr) r) g g g a a a N Z a � C' W44�4 , IPYHIRIT F a Z 5 CL [D Z g CL N Z a U_ O 2 Z 5 5 IL a to co LL O co 2 w D x� Oo U3 C')a ar w� 0 >� w$ 0 os fn= w v m , Ug Q P520 a a CL Q m U W W W C7 C7 C7 g � g LO co U- 0 v cn P521 9 Z a 9 Z g a m C, Z g m N Z g a U cn Z a U N Z a m_ Z 3 a U Z 5 EL Z 5 CL LL O co P522 EXHIBIT G rQ V Z 0 75 U Z U 0 200 U Z Q LL 0 U X gg J Q 9 Z gg Y4cc � 4 LU Q g9 W a� = -ds„ U) fA J Q 9 Q � � 4 LU Q g9 G Q W U W w CL S LO LL 0 Li LA n 9 a P523 Q 9 LU � � 4 G Q W U W w CL S LO LL 0 Li LA n 9 a P523 T- a® Lo LL O N M P524 z g CL LL§ O: � S R z 3 CL O 0.- LL :LL = \� Ln LL O cn z O W J W W O cn F 2 (! H z O F Q w LU w 0 LL w J u z O Q w LU O w W m 525 a_ LA LL 0 U) 0 Z U) 4. -KI -I 1— < LU 2 z w LL LU U ) w 0 ry LLJ w W w U) 0 Z W 1: U) C 41 r7 O < o z L -i 0 t� Ikk Z 0 Ix U. LA LL 0 U) 0 Z U) 4. -KI -I co W r W Z k�4;•?��+ 9 w0:1 SE3SE y9 J CL a J_ F LL W Z 0 W W W 0 cn F- m 0 PA NW�/ LL J Q ry W S� G O U W ry U) O J U Z W U) Q P527 UL 0 0 p3 EXHIBIT H z 0 0 co M: X w Z Mif LLJ HIM- Lu will J-Mll I I P528 i U) < LU 'd; flil w Hi W 11H 0 -0, 'fill", Epp M I P528 21 i '3 g Q B w� �g O$ U� m &4:. XO 1 m t as U3 W Wo o �g 0 IX u Q U gC3 k W S W D: o Ug O° s P530 �* 0 o 5 g` J r Sow w =o0 o`; F O Z o0 mw cn m t as U3 W Wo o �g 0 IX u Q U gC3 k W S W D: o Ug O° s P530 41 1 41 P531 _ C o o � I v UP. . eV 2k 9 O O, m= 41 P531 No II �� Iii III � iw�w�uuiuiauimuuroiuiYi�iuuiiiun 4O i s I I I I I I I I I C) N LL0 TV P532 O N U- 0 P533 8'. P534 P535 04 LL 0 00 to �O ZZ =1 w L3 cr jn --3U7— 2w X W P535 D A - ----" 3 J P536 J P537 0 N LL 0 2 O U*= wgw Z"I- O m ffi Qg U� W o ig �$ 0 LU Xs <�F d W .F W Ug P538 sffi < x W o ig 0 w w u < U) Y W W Ug co, P539 0 U - sffi < x W o ig 0 w w u < U) Y W W Ug co, P539 0 N U- 0 ? P540 `d38V 4 I"! 't'_I .i 51311.5 z In, O o P541 L -- In, c N N U- '03 4' P542 QN W_ m t2 Z O wbW z w o � m P543 P U, P544 N U - u F F '17 7- '9i'f'l 7: M'1-7 P U, P544 u 3 77 "1 T 'I TIT P m 0 N LL 0 z Z§ LD W (r w x w P545 ---------- ------------- ------------- ---------- ------------- 2. --------------- ------------------- ------- ------------------- - ---- z ----------- ------------ - ------------------ U) cl ------------------------- z T____-____________JI ----- LLI 0 LLI En ;M, 11.1 0 z z 0 w z 0 m C) N LL 0 is Lu < co Lu < wo P547 "K -6U 11561 3NOHd 08916 Vo NNOiIOO W 2 3vns'313uio MOIOtivM ogzz NOIHOH'H'0 HOj 03M38d 4-..9 --- 3100 AG03Wd3Ud Wd N011yv7an 2115 2691-606 6P548 2919, ON d11Y+3]tivd 3NIYIN3l! ami or rm,�vnl3Nlrinal R N` Id a `— O NOuvzimn 3AS S30NVH0 NV1d 1:Ww.1 S1N31N00 ONtMY6q n � c a U � w E = w 8 ga a gg a` v �_ Z y s z,�Y���aI O is w 9i �e�gq g 3 z 1 i =a �aSj9 tal�sa_' Wa"$}}i des ..w��jj`�=c®i 5:r " U9g8�r a+ 3tj�55k� �3 �Mgj 13 z U Z M, z Q 7 U�.A& r. EXHIBIT GVON 3NIl 3SVG ..1 .._ "V Z 3vl fNN= ps z O�xK Qwa�� a �2nCq �< 0. �p�T o Z � ¢a i0y �* W` n' i F. A. r \ '+`1;, I' '9K = f F��1 a riK•6CL(156) 3NOHd OBBZ6'V3'VNOa03 - 60l 3LN5.313a13 A10laHvm 6622 NOIHOH'Zfa moi a3aVd3Hd 3100M s39NVH3 —NV d j L33ro8d AS a3atld3Nd NVId ONIOVdO 1>Nld77N07 -269 —>08 NT X549 78 WIXI—I1 d3NLVIN31 R zmaz'oN dm IT L]N1VIN31 NVId a O 3AS 4311VIT]0 $ =d 3 as =� SIN31NOD ONIMVaa a Q b ye 8Cq Z �� z a yOI,x �? - rp z�0 3 �n4 4 ¢a�Z: 7A 0.� ' p„'� �Y V U Z W2 E - P" WO;; z sa I) ouvA3inoe )133283 AVO - - I , F.}___________1'LlW3'IL______r__ auq.M 1 ar �f 0 _ 6>• sum v — — NU ,1 p,I� 1 tl _ • �ri/� kE7 -TI A( 1 - T— - _- I — _ DIY Y F -ci-1 �' _ — _—•J a U a. -a I C 1 _1 w R T11 17 . LU a it — i c— cn k 7 CO I _ _ k � rz 9 p AN .1=8 ' I miicaaaw MRl 30S ,"'»`""•^'"^1AQ�"• b V"SfiC1(458) 3NOHd +JY•'v-'J1YUY(}i 7Yf11d]�NQ3 'CG9C-aC& H'f ON V3'VNOtl03 - - "'"v — 1'550 0043mns, 13H13 MOlONYM OBZL --4 rr a\ wdvn rrjwa 3.viru+3. - NOINOH'H0 .. I tf 4ste off am 4Ovu4.rur- W1. , N b0d 03UVd38d NVId 3 C:) 311S 0311d130 4 n>n-w�ru - 310 S30NYH3 NY'ld 103rCMd SiN11403 3NIMYNO (] - ! AS 03HYd38d ov x a� .- O yey i�ig i w �,pEW�R zrrj1N 93i4PggG Q QQ+_' IT wH wu�� all i$pIlMll u 611 E A- 3Yb w65e�ui iyB't W W m6: n1,1 O o11fill aak.f_j i 4tm3inos N33HO AVO =_---- � X � k' .o . g I IT_ z ® _ I full Z TL_ uj uj T— ® — 0 — N �1 H '1 �\ W �I� ,- �—..- •LJ I� llLl _III �l ���e r "_.. _ J AArd 30S "PS-6CL4581'3NO14d OBBZa'VO'VNOH03 O on "ns'313H M0M M OBZZ NOIHOH •21.0 wi 038Vd3Hd 310am A0 a3tlVd38d ... mess andrs.mwd �rtirutat R --• a O dVVY 130HVd 3AUVIN31 g� fl S30NVH3 NV1d MrMd SLN31NO3 ONIMVaa — ` j C CL r - N AAbe� O W 3 w Lu > ? a H _ W �gy �M�4�8���� Z $$��1�g� Z ���• Y� U tl1�v � a�`�TiV C 1 . •.a T 33 G > Wggss �Y z E..� o d;$ea3$83E a td#3 5 z�#3 _r--.•_.:er - - — -- ------ - – ! 1al 4 -parte NEW AVa p R X � 1 • _yt_ _ yr_ —rr_ 1 ® 1 ® 1 �r - �i 3dtc�An -..• yy� d-.{--��i3 1 d y T0`Y I I II Y- II 9 d P551 WK-6C1(IS6) 3NOHd O"16'VO 11NONO3 OOI mins '313N13 MOIONVM 09M N0180H'H'O .NOd 03NYd3Nd 310 A9 038Yd3Hd P552 MAI 'O —1, Wd3NIILMI �. ^' O dVW 1308W 3AIlVIN31 o S30NVH3 M/ld 133fONd - S1N31NO3 OHIMYSO ^ N 'c dt U`�'•9i h �c tisk KY !Z5 Vl 4 < $H00�gl w a. u�e_ as k i y 3N sJl - 0 a M w 3fig s i! ? 3 a s---'�- w $g8a¢�a� I1 :�rxNtr 3nr AMx Ol l :i1Y05 Z ilSy� �� T'• Ai - _ - - - aavnmnoe N33aO AVG o n a, x u���—�\s e�0urf� in .fr1 ismgn I ry Mill p i — W w J 0¢ U a x cn a N 8 @; w d a' ` �� 3 �yep�p E LU If mW If a � ® McJw. e I Jeer. • �- 03 ■ �gg3 a �Jyl,ma U;; sSnam ' If go L3MAJ 7 WW • r3NJCJ eOW N3MAJ ` /Jbf �u:M3GACOW _ -b3M3f ___ T ___\.. � _ _ - _ _ � 'Y-�5� ; O°-- Wiii�77a$ I i. j 3ua�� u�-bus bfMa➢,egM bssrM bLrMi'meOYfW b31YMJ '..• ��Y �.,`Mu.M NNf ' �bllrw J'e0M �' ,\�3AN.K'f9M � x i< 8 h U1Q �� e`i r 'S FI ® it 0 Y S �1- gadd 8 1 � s H z 4yys'.3.�cn N .. �o �mN bfM,�^Jew ,1 N3M3s JmNe ,� NlaaJ mw K l A _ ' ANii 300. @ pd R r O . AW ® n �; n�ifYVmx b31rMJ e0Y -} W E Mill W w J 0¢ U a x cn a N 8 @; w d a' ` �� 3 �yep�p E LU mW b xas J eob. a �o@ • �- a J .. f i< a o ��jp a �Jyl,ma U;; sSnam ' p!p ) �¢y7G L3MAJ 7 WW • r3NJCJ eOW N3MAJ ` /Jbf �u:M3GACOW _ -b3M3f ___ T ___\.. � _ _ - _ _ � 'Y-�5� ; O°-- Wiii�77a$ I i. j 3ua�� u�-bus - � bssrM bLrMi'meOYfW b31YMJ '..• ��Y �.,`Mu.M NNf ' �bllrw J'e0M �' ,\�3AN.K'f9M � x h 8 y r - j y n3M35J J aClY �1- gadd 8 1 z e I ' ANii 300. @ pd r O . "V9-6CL(t96) 3NOHd 09912'"0803 00131N15'313tl10 MOl0NVM 08tL--- NOlHOWER) .. _-__•_ LOd 038Vd3Bd 3o's.osro. 310 539NVH3 NVId AS 03HVd3Hd P553 >9,et'pf dVN 13]Wd 3N1ViH31 �i I^ co 3 O d` V4130HVd 3AIlVIN31 133roOd UN31NO3 ONIMV80 H cq �y t ip Q ,]fin C.,a Yo i 9. _ 4q �t ....... ®m.Vyeyriaq _.J__ �i a -°,� ia3�fj 113e.. �3 J ..,I �� � - a o s oia a @� _• Uyz,a < UJ $ ? ASfi w U, �E E.� t a g I « aro&Tms )23uo AVa .3 V3J Lf °# �v w.#s. r��ia�'k i• � SWM � I —� le ` .141MJ ors roe ,�, ° e A �- nw3aJ dom .. •�� C x - w3as'fom � d3•.t33 J� tlom � �� - 8y " v 1 tl3lvM3Yf Idl f .K'r�.. 3tlM tlC,l! 3eM � .WdaJ Rw xeN4 . .fir JL _, .. tl3wi9J VOWyyI� � ! — • � y" tl3,.wJtldm � ® 4_ �� wa gg U .-, 6 H tlftvw., e0u. .3.3i J d0Y IE tlsu xlw39J,Aw 0 3w35J.d3m V3w33i,dOW. INAAdOm°� � � mw33Jetl. ' .3t9�3Mf • 3a KaOW yya�� —. — tl3,��, .• 3,.w3Yf: v 3dW.K m.. '(' 3rP..H dom 3tlD�J __. 4 �JiaOW � .�Y1vwJ e0W � t YV3lvw�J dRCm tlllv�ffl e0m �' 99 sS V ` F .6�3JL,.Jx rorSICL 4961'3NOHd 0G9Z6'VO'VNONOO ou 3llf15 3l7NIO A60lONVM OBli N018014'21.0 NOd 038Vd3bd 310 A6 03NVd3bd r 4 rry�� F i�SSd2"� p $ w dE3 5� w+ te r g ySy?' y '• .= 'y$PP4�d�91 is 3 z a� QlImme 7®47 AVO i.�• - i -h7 ._ - - _ _�_ _ ___._-. _,.t _'.T._-,. I." }� "E.^' sK asnoan r. , as X 4 i • Y I 1 h I I 1 � • �r I � COL —••— J E f ®ar •� I .rte 3SCt�x d zmotoxam i7vw ywrurLs dVVY IDVHi 3AIiViN31 103CONd S1N31N00 ONIMVNO R a s P554 O $ 62 d' i S30NVH0 NV'7d Y r 4 rry�� F i�SSd2"� p $ w dE3 5� w+ te r g ySy?' y '• .= 'y$PP4�d�91 is 3 z a� QlImme 7®47 AVO i.�• - i -h7 ._ - - _ _�_ _ ___._-. _,.t _'.T._-,. I." }� "E.^' sK asnoan r. , as X 4 i • Y I 1 h I I 1 � • �r I � COL —••— J E f ®ar •� I .rte 3SCt�x d v v d' i 9�II Y �I it 6a II � 3 c o - v Y"9-6EL(L98)3NOHd MZ6'VO'VN000O 001 311n5'310tl10 MOIOtlVM OBZZ NOiHOH'2P0 HOd O3HVd3tld 310GVMW A9 03ilVd3tld S P555 ...�.�._� LCOxL'ON dWILTR113NIrIN31 � u ry _.. ,... dVW 1OV8l 3AUVA31 s 530NVHO NV1d DROtldg . S1N31N00 ONIMVtlO O a r aay a 9 B o e v re W sa ,3 Oa '1a•Hac..a H.E.H. w3W p Z �35a" �-� w _9i 0 ig 6b Z gam'" Uegs'i: O=R <' .I r rd 1 oF;F3�3`�g J •� v gdYRY+ _ V€ r' G W as s � 6g 0 ol!$01 I 9 1 �a:a � 53 €E! ¢ << x Z �', rxx,.n. v §$444g±H8 3; = �+•+ f g" 3i ° = g ¢ Uzi l•• M»mm . 3nrxN.x Or l 1r75 {j/j— O iwtllx0 .te l! zr-, F LW c `4C Z to OHtlA3Y109 » AVO -- --- 08VA31nas A3380 AVO^ - -4- 5y Y Orn �q_qg2 q3q�_3q LUuj i Wg a a w $� 8 :C s 0 a " x�ga. .tl,M39S dow ' xwca mr ev,.x., aar xLn39S d0u, xaus�aow � 3ua s VI ,, uvr. '` u,l .ri aom '• vo.+, aow � ru�Mnu , OI k rnw.'.. me0beiu � 4 i u,..x�i ,.oxx ro.r ° 4D s .e NUI! 30s 3 Y"9-6CL(LSe) 3NOHd 0 0 616'VO'VNON00 OOL 3L1f15'310NI0 MAIOtlVM OfiZZ NOiHOH *H'O HOd 03HVd38d as�awmu 310 S30NYHO NV1d AS O38Vd3Nd L[➢@'ON dWl1T'tl13N1rIM31 dVW 13V81 3AUV MrObd SLNKNOO ONIMYMO P556 R 3 O 1 d a: n I� wy s as g6b __•-__. .". w" ns•r rusaaa " �s- 3 I t a ZHI y � •'��... {"�34�g��As� V � _L.-'!Nryi. ,rip C1%ATnOG iEEN'D AVO F- U F q x R. K 154 d 12-Q ze�fl F gm1 v u' i >ugg�� 4 z t 0 �� 3 3 Yi.MSJ'"71 N z M _a _ey = Z- � tea_ O s N < •n I`.__.—.-br imav—. YSMat�.oVI SOfl �v .tl3N3lJ dOM Sy� � - _r - •= YlW9J'e0W- ®� _' ` �� `'3 _x3lrMJ eau I® J1 ' , 1 �O ... n3trMJ-mW / Ltl31YM3tlrJ"YOW _ • � , Y31rM.r Wa,XJ O)Ile YCYY i 8• '0• s OD xx ® aa , _ E�s`sp `e �y .. ,. 3MIDJYotls Y1M,XJ aotln n3MAJ1'A1M �. '-.. .i YiMAtI'OJN y♦�—n� JpW w }�� 47 �— h � ^�Q 0 s+f O m 8Y HY YLrMrpW r ^� \ �r / r'YllwJ'eoW - •h g� bf Y � � '�y tliMl9.X a0W -x1MAJYOW 8 _ 3�MArMJ aOYn r �, 31rMJ ' WW _� -YWdYJ oW Y)MiXJ aoW n3M3fJ• aaW MMR2� mYI i eoW 6 Y3WfJ aM X � a sax YOYo ♦ ♦ '` yo, A Yor ` - � ♦ 3gIx Y0W y� � yp� iAnxeOW 3A•Ji eOW`� i ♦-"uMA�'a0W _ (� FY `tl3IrMJ'a0W � YII�iXJmW Xn31r�MaaOW �� � �Efi ♦ _ 1 riMnJ-mW` J � �� g �sMrYa a ,i� 3 iSiJ n "-6CL 1196) 3NOHd ON16 V3'VNOHOO 00131105'313blo MOMEIVM 09zz N018OH'2f0 HOA 03HVd3Hd 310GVMW As a38Vd3Ud NV7d ONOVdO 7W.1ldiJNO7 Y6V �....-..-�,—_. ,,,.—._•�.,� L11B1 ON e11113]tivd 3N1v1N311 LC06t ON dM 1]Vtll3Nlv1N31 _ JNIOVb 1Vf11d30N00 S30NYHO NVId I 133rCNd c �$g p9A aY > 8 x 1: C p g ie y. s=c� Mull! 3��3i$ Mull! � H w ����n� w 1��Y ;e � ��S�i o �p <5� gg 1 _ { a € g4444-= �8 3 5 d� = �i Ug y�I z fig �...flamgw o ��@�'-aaa 8 �3 �a :ml e� 5 URI] S1N31NOO ONIMVtl0 P557 "PS-6CLI M) 3NOHd 0 69 Z6 V3 VNOWO SMl 31Si5.31O813 MolobVM 66ZZ NolHOH'M O °Oi O3HYd3ad 310 AS O38Vd38d NVId •JNIOVHD IV/ILd]:;NO7 'L6oe->n', 3 =81 ON dM 133W43N1V1 Mt 1CtP2'ON dW11]Y°k 3 LVL 3k NVId JNIMID ivnid33NO3 w g$ d a w ' �H k ui 1 I 'an-' 9 j a4 I. ' S3ONVH3 NVid 133CMlId SLMHHOO ONIMY6O 3 -d z v Z M �? tla W Q o< w g$ d a w ' �H k ui 1 I 'an-' 9 j a4 I. ' Hill 3p�p€� g dy •r�S, U 1 8 R ��tI� � �� � �I�3gSgg33�a�1�@� w yS]]e]yy z y{yy�gf�OL J6� U 111-1111 gs V C3 f0A��A dad # E 133HS 33S 3 -d z v Z M �? tla W Q o< w g$ d a w ' �H k v � ...7 uy O� z 'W'N c� p xL > Z�;t tvg3yy3i 21 O p 7 w yS]]e]yy z y{yy�gf�OL J6� U 111-1111 gs V C3 f0A��A dad # Z Q U <<y$ o Holt-, aid#1 3 5a 113 02 O ] E- >`<e ` w 1 ; r a d ^< Ell <Z � _1#rte ISI i'1 mer 0 P558 n-K-6EL(M) 3NOHd NVId 9NIMO IV111d1:NO7 'Z59e-:_ OSSZ6'Vo VP559 NO803 J 9 OOt RMS'310810 mo (IbvM O6ZZ 29[51' dMMWd3ALL 1 311 _ NOi8oH'H'0 2[09[. dvn i3nu 3N1v2N33 HOA 03hVd3Nd NVId 3 M ' a O ONIOVaJ 1df11d33N00 ' s 310GVW S39NYHO NV1d 103rOad I S1N31N00 9NIM960 n AS G3NVd3Hd Z 133HS 33S z S o 8NN< v Z Mhz ga�6 cii e5 0. En ON a w - 3 g O a w ��a 3� �w S �,ay.7 K '5_ d �OQ LLJ Wi<a �aS;Ry�� Ayzz;spa ' e auall @u[� �0wu e �^ •w�<�3 .• . {Ii°- •�i�a�: ,,{'a<,!-. I.�O,F"'Z u ad E- u i -i q— t r� I 433 Bg5 J3 �55SS NY dilEg€ 9133HS 33S Z 133HS 33S z S o 8NN< v Z Mhz ga�6 cii e5 0. En ON a w - 3 g O a w ��a 3� �w S �,ay.7 K '5_ d �OQ LLJ Wi<a �aS;Ry�� Ayzz;spa ' e auall @u[� �0wu e �^ •w�<�3 .• . {Ii°- •�i�a�: ,,{'a<,!-. I.�O,F"'Z u ad E- u i -i q— "KIELIMS) 3NOHd 00V3 "08Mwt 311FIS 317"0 MO'OHYM 0612 N018OH'"'O HOd (IMMOHd 310 As a3HYd3Hd S30NYH0 NY1d 1 W any -N �8Y83�� r� HIM, �t ." 3ms'hos� =��ig NY'd ONIOVLLO IY/)ld]:NOJ -'L69% - Me, ON aYfl 13]tlVa 3N1VIN311 2000L'IX� awn I]VNI 3MVIN31 NMId a 0 ONRIVUE) ivnld3ON00 $ io d ' S1N31N00 ONIMYNO F ww a a6 v We pq- ¢ y LU W G.Y_i iW 'd $ W z g� 8 ��F w MI w � 'e w - 3 �of g e g�� o HIM v 1.e33�8� a oai�=3 5 3:3s�@3 -1 t --- A." — --K -- cs= ��— � - -----�-------_f-3`_�------:tee------•—___—_ _.... Y _._.V X X :Is OdOU 3Nn 3sve _ I_ E133HS 33S O� Z eQ Z M10z g- L: 0- 00 H A0. zz. g a E lu- Qp >--u Flo w�'-t� >�»C a iL0 Wv ~Qx ° E- Z _ � ¢z= y� F, H = E P560 .f 1 7i •f'4 � _ B -Ml. y w � s z¢ i9E J WA4y9Sj� �w •'tLi*S'�H®I D X35 Wyyk SQqyj yqy¢ �2[811- IC, ' 99 41, • I -�� 2 r p P560 IVIS-6EL I L96) 3NOHd 09103 VN0003 ool 31105'31ON13 MOIOtlVM 09ZZ NOlHOH 813Hoj 03tlVd3tld 310uvw AB 03HVd3Nd A o . u"uryi. �. µ NY7d 7NIUY!/9 /Yf,1dJ�N07 X69--�� P561 01610 dm MWdlNVLMf rmuc.�dm ,mt�u,V,Na, R — - NVId a Lo O JNKME) IVf11dKN00 s e ''' S30NVHO NY7d 103EONd SLN31NO3 ONIMV80 e z ''.I • 1 Y..: a a P F M"al ~ N CN a ry z M '�p z 5 w CL 9 ' W d $E�" I r.+ x v w a •-1 ut O G� = f C v7 4 � §g4448a�1ai F 9 133H 33S i 9 = gig all�93E�n�.y� W ^i z CL W=s a I U WEE' ya ''.I • 1 Y..: 4 y C�Ey3� M"al ~ N CN a ry z M '�p z 5 w CL 9 ' W d $E�" I r.+ x v w a •-1 ut O G� = f C v7 4 � EEE6}�00=� MIS, F U Z. z E y '' v €gg5� 93 - �a�R � �SoR zSYp E 53 Q E.I ai c��U :5 o all, l acd§Sh #tai C7rzQLl.Z-<y - r4 C •"•$_N ly s a_ U Z �... b rvrva i,esra� i 9 = gig all�93E�n�.y� W ^i z CL W=s a I U WEE' ya ''.I • 1 Y..: 4 y C�Ey3� M"al I r.+ I - r4 ly s i 9 = gig all�93E�n�.y� W ^i z CL W=s a I U WEE' ya "-6CL(t96) 3NOHd 66626 VO VNOH03 OOt 31N1S'3108 10 M010tlVM OBZZ N020I 1 Zf 0 :HOA 03UV 13W 310GVW AS 038Vd3Md sYdi ai i�7 ��• -taaru� r r s♦a NV7d ONIOVYO 17'01d7�N00 'L69, 291b1'ON aM 13]Wd 3NIv1N311 Ll9tlL'ON dvt� 1]YIII 3N1v1N31 NVId DNIG"D ivn-Ld30N0 S30NVHO NVId 103CONd SIN31NOO OMMVbO t f V C-4 – Z m1,0 zg� n < CD r-- s i w g� _ O N W i B Iz7 a 'y ��1 a� Mini k $S �– s Q Z _� U 0 in }Z! tMa3 5 3H €-9 ¢a:ra 9w� tl�Q WWrri UJy���Rp iSg 4'i8Y446Saa8� Z F L133HS 33S,a v� S 133HS 335 8 uj f V C-4 – Z m1,0 zg� n < CD r-- s i w g� _ O N W i B Iz7 a 'y ��1 �IUO�z s �' cn N 7' Xj $a U $S �– s Q Z _� U 0 in }Z! tMa3 5 3H €-9 ¢a:ra Y �111 2W>< - i v� I �g y sF<<_ c ¢ z z} '•h oc zo V 5�� h� rv� E- z P562 "KIEL496) 3NOHd 0661 6'VO'11NON00 601311NS'31OH10 MOlONVM a9ZZ N01a0H'a'o 8Od 03tltld3tld AS OUVd3tld NV d ONIOVL'J 259C—POJ WT to563 }� tic_ S s a 9Ma"��g s "C) Z c v Z M �s y= W ¢ o r... 84 o i� ap sr c oN < s� $? w w �jCi7 �8 Ld a6E O .. ;t w a9 z 3 ui e�oy �� A z Z -mob r. Q c y .. r x " o "dRI§s;is c) Ml it a caS z3 g a.�s$$9 C7 � Q ? �� �z W>_ � C) WUI-4Qs a Z C) Q zr Y OU H �a E- q -�— , aldol 3tn 3sve _ ---- —<— iEl. Na a s ..r 4,0�,a..... x E ,r •sc •1 r 3��y aw�w Q 9133H93as E fuel -aN am ln�wa aN1r1N31 r ICOOL'ONdm 1T 13 LV1N31 NVId `JNIOVNE) IVf11d3ONO3 S30NVH3 NVid 103robd S1N31N00 0NIMVMa }� tic_ S s a 9Ma"��g s "C) Z c v Z M �s y= W ¢ o r... 84 o i� ap sr c oN < s� $? w w �jCi7 �8 Ld a6E O .. ;t w a9 z 3 ui e�oy �� A z Z -mob r. Q c y .. r x " o "dRI§s;is c) Ml it a caS z3 g a.�s$$9 C7 � Q ? �� �z W>_ � C) WUI-4Qs a Z C) Q zr Y OU H �a E- q -�— , aldol 3tn 3sve _ ---- —<— iEl. Na a s ..r 4,0�,a..... x E ,r •sc •1 r 3��y aw�w Q 9133H93as E "ICL (tSB) :3NOHd o6I"O'VNoeoo on 31INs •313813 M010lIVM OBU NOIHOH'a'a :HOA 038Vd3Ud .9f.f,�910 310 As 03MVd3bd NVld JNIOVW) Wli1 J:N07 �269C->02 z M oz� ¢� o � s C7�nN~na 00 z z <:x Y Q� ssZ, Y Q� �v p9 <�d�6 30 3ocn C7rz¢0.i:- �D� Y I C) u] U 'd ¢ Z a UII o ` w! -r U F Baa �z # 41 a '' g M s I � a � O Y Y r C � a I 3 e MN j W All y ;a ��I ! r .,�� I I 4 II � 8� � •� @� N � 6 '� 8� I I � I I � � . 11 B •� #; sr II( Y yy�� Y y li �3 Y y Ce Y fits All _ 4_... P564 =61'ONdm 133tl 3N1r1N31f tCIDt'ON d W I ITMI 3Nt rIN3l NVId JNIGVHO ivnid33NO3 S30NVH3 NVId 103rosd S1N31N00 SMIMV80 z M oz� ¢� o � s C7�nN~na 00 z z <:x Y Q� ssZ, Y Q� �v p9 <�d�6 30 3ocn C7rz¢0.i:- �D� Y I C) u] U 'd ¢ Z a UII o ` w! -r U F Baa �z # 41 a '' g M s I � a � O Y Y r C � a I 3 e MN j W All y ;a ��I ! r .,�� I I 4 II � 8� � •� @� N � 6 '� 8� I I � I I � � . 11 B •� #; sr II( Y yy�� Y y li �3 Y y Ce Y fits All _ 4_... P564 P"Sif1(IG6):3NOHd ON *VO'VNOU00 wt3LNS'31OBI0 MOIOBVM OBZZ N0180H ,8,0 BOJ 03BVd3Bd AB 03BVd3Bd NV'd JNIUVLJ 17,t71dj.N0.7 269,—>ON P565 dlll'dl dYYI D]BYd 3NtYW311 ifOOL'Ox dYn 1]Vtl13Nly Wal NVId JNIOV80 ivnid33N00 S39NVHO NVId 103fOBd SMUNOO 9NIMVBO "KIEL (1S6)3NOHd 0 2 0 L6 YO VNOH03 OOl 31H1S 333H13 MOIOHVM OR NO11JOH'8'O HOA O3HVd3Hd .-- -- 330 AS O3HVd3Hd I am;. aN dvN i�u 3nurul3l NVId 1N31N39VNVW W5�7 y Z3y�q1 Z i LU A-Lnvn0 N3.LVM AdYNIWI13Nd S3ONVH3 NVId 133raMd SLN31NO3 ONIMVHO �6AAIm ®087 Imm ate. opo Jaz W5�7 y Z3y�q1 Z i LU 41 • 1 1 1 95 � $ � � 'r � � 010 s� J wx� a gy ag$�° �gagg� Q��s gI EES CC 8 a LU g s w ad6S � iS i �o pE RE93e6 Y SCtCCF 93g0_i Qgm a ff_ . i axr�noe M3'. P566 3 3BB� W5�7 y Z3y�q1 Z i LU 41 • 1 1 1 95 � $ � � � Bgigg s� P566 3 3BB� W5�7 y Z3y�q1 Z i LU Willi�343g W 95 � $ � � � Bgigg s� gQ: g ui gy ag$�° j� g3s�w gra S � Wa si ti y � � �� � 8 a LU g s w El El a --I i— ,ng6c, 4W 3NOHd 096Z6'V3VNOHOO 00l 31XI5'3.OH13 MO,OHVM fiBZZ - NOLaOH -8'0 HOA 03HVd3Hd - "" 3100 MNVH3 NYid LOXONd AS O3HVd38d •er d )N --VN:) r/•la_-NO : LS . 567 Ever ON aN•t3:VV13NL•1N31 R }ECOeL ON dvw la•tl13N••1H3. 11 ddW n=i / ano >e $ ILL ' s h' = 5030W aNIMViq N e 1 V i e is F u rF CN N M1.0 Z a Y Y w>f a A 0 ON 5 dtl "a �pz z �a€baa w s3 pg?"ill a. � C) Q ' 7 pilaw gal T¢gj� z ON Y p6 W G�S3 ,Q�, az z %Zyb s ❑ ���e v9� CkslLL,5 20 33z�c mwnNsill 4� U O,¢ 3" r" T� i x E� �<< O Q —a W E90aav� W - � nom: - - aavn3�no9-H3aa�-Ava' I' .Tt ?53 a{ 2 a?- i ??? 44aaa? i7aa:' aaaaaa?i4;. i 3 Ay'????a aaaaaaaaa? ? q?aay �aL77astiLa.a.aaa.aa. a s ? ILL gII If. 5 4?7i?7747 s aaa=$4ii ? 7i14#ii{4 a�3aa?iii ? aa�S?{{ ? Q as asaa a?,7}1-7 -_-- ? {i4?} i#?:6352 as a:aaa a a ??? ?aha?ii4li i?aa aa.g{•?q ? aara}hp a aada.aaa y ^q.?? ??? ?? ?? ??{{? {??? ?? ?4?i.?7 aaa aaa�ajS sa asaa a•,a1a Aja �a�,;??�{{{4{ ?? 4i�???4i��????{{{a�a:aa :?{4as b {{ ?# aa�o,3•ap°�:: a_saa;ga'sa aaaaaa??F?ii4# ? ?4{{??'#i{?a{?.a?�#q:{aa,saaa {� �-a=a_ #�{a ,y vX*a aA a - a : a s 1 A a A a a aaa a a{. i...+"a q -41 -Z ? ? i-4 ?-{j .2-2-F,q_ga�a�a�a_a..�aa� as a: a a as {aaa3a323a •s 7:13.1 aaZl •aaa ? {{�? ?? {-�sa?yaaaa aaa:a'aa2ai ??�sas-5¢p?#?T aaaaaa. a a aaa--aaara aa�s• ? ????# ?i{{aa—aaaa aaaaaa as -4:{{ p:oar haaaaaa -a_a: :: .;aala ? { {{{ {{?4P -a�fa-a=s as aaaa 4aq{ ?aaaa •[ a a a a a a a -aa a s a: a a aaaa a s a a a } p- • a aaa { a{{ a: a a a a { aaaaaa 7aa l: asa- aaaa:a-Y� as aal{{{ p {{aa i aaaaaa- iaa= 33 a' PW - aii a iax 9.7 a# i i P. i i{: a a: a a a a•a a s aaa :� ala 4 4 4 1 a. S� :`: ate---aaaaaaaaaa aaa�i{{ap�H a:=a: {{aaa�y_� aan"�� - a aaa aa'la ::vya :pa54#{,a aaaa.aa a4a:aala;aaaa as .j- •:aa:: 44 4. i a a a a a � a a •: •-• :a ___a... 2 aaa:a a a:as�a a a a 'a �Yv3 aaaaa aaaa'a3�:a+ :a'aala3aa:aaaaaa:aa -aaaaaa aaaa:::a:aaaa?4i4i - aa a. jjd a a7yaa 'a �aagaa=ga;':aa-aa�ra _Z-4_ �- r{-� �i4 - 1�3 .a_'aa: .aa _pa`- �• �aa - aapa as a= a :a a,12 2. a�a aa a :P,:; a 4 a a a s zN:==iz2aa ��=_:=a-aa—aaaa as as 32aA as ail:h:4T a aaa.yapaaa a:-ZIA2aaaaa a. ala as la aaAm32 a as as ',� aaa'aa :-a - - s�aa4.1N33 a133Pal5 a5 11 1a :. aad1: :'�. aaaaa oda S"a.a �":�a : ti •-.� .� ^ a;a ^a aaaaa a a- JL �5 a a a a- a s a s a s a s a s a a a a A a a A a a ia233:2.2 aaa 4•s--®r,sjaa=a aalaa as a as a:aaaaal a; av ��� -.aa�-- .j •• a: a a i 2 g a 2 ^_ 2 a _ aaa-. ala � a: a a a s: a a� a 1 a s a z ^ a a a a a � a s a:- a: a ❑_ a: - e'hi1�a N - �!' - •aaaaas90232.a 7aaa. a.ay:-asaa :a':'ia.__; ::: - baa a� :'>�a': as a7- aa'' _a�'a� r•? :,a�•i as a a7 y2;1222=7' aaaa: a+a=aaaa aaaa a -aa .aj- a3 aj-2�0 a- aaa-:'it as o :aaa a7i 8%r2Qad aa_ar: �-aa•allaare�aaasasaaaa a as o a -a s_ aTaaa a:. '+t - a= a: a - �a �a -a-a • a s: a a N a a a a: as_;_� « a a•ar nS ^ v a a� _ - a a a a;-^a:a ..i: as ati:9a 7 alaJa. .yam- v :s'^au�aa—J-a-M.12z a�—��-•i =aa: as a: -o w ' �.] a 3 s aT a.-�•J�%'J.,,��}.rte. «l9 =aaaa »aaaa «: a a a a p a s a s 3-} LUz n'.aa—a:�a �-a a� a--7'. =--a.«=���- ALL a«,Ta=:��-aaaalla�"' aina?-:a.a,a- R+a. 7 a a 4_W; a' `5�� �=a ,s w •aaa - .. - L -a's'�'aa aaa�Maaaa�a-?a•�: a -a -a a a Cha aaa:a aaaaaaa�{a2:�a >7a:_ s:�.3�N9.a.�=,:- aaaaaa as:gala :;:: ya;aa aa:p;a:aa:aa sFyaaaaaaas:= m a:.aaaa7a'2'a= %::=3�a%�a��,a a-. �raa a#:�a�_aa�aaaaai_Maaa a=amaaa:aaa_ZrZ:«a=2 = a ':9aasay:l=?7 :aaa: •� aAara ar3�= G"'r«a a' aaaa _: a• - ^aa:: aaa Ni „�.aay $'a 'd Na e` a'aa§ a .a : .aaaaaa~ .:aaa as awaa:«:. aaava2 a�7zaa aa.�.2a�^;: aaaa- as/a'a:aa- aaaaa a- �a -a- a.-.maaa a aa• _ a__ _. a-�- aam;1 232:,f• aaa-aa_�aaaa-- «-1aa a r_j aaa aaa as a _ - a®aa,_ •®^-:a +-,al: a7'J1 aaaaa a -ate,. as 1a' "aaa _ - _a a aha- «a=a a ;. a' -r -a a as«aaaa 3 a7 as :aa.� «- -==aa=a�'.aaa- �1:,-.aa re -a -a- - � = a -a�r;. ?a=aaa 3a«a. a �aaaaT�aTaTaa a3•aaa as a-aaaa-_a a a«aa a - a �aT7 i ^aaaa aaaaa a — _ d.caa{•aa a' _'aa aaa_ a= aaa_ aa- as --I a as -?q.�aa aaa a. �a ?l a:aa-aaa a=•a a aaaaa aa,-: Z. -^-aaa -aaaaaa aaMa«a3".: i{.e-aau4raaaaa aaa- �--{ata•da�=�ai.�.wa aaa-aa as-a-'aaa i{'-aya�aa i _❑baa a -a�laaaaa 'ai=.^asa aMaa9---a a_-v;�=- a - a!aaaa-�'�=ia'i-{i`? ."-=_? —z aaa. 7747iiaadzu'aa=aa2 aaasOaa�a�:aaa aa.•�..._{-_ii_#? �?�a4 n .'1a a'paaa_a_a .aa -aa:- -- ???{ 4aa'aaaaaa. -{iii??{4{i''{{aa= -•daa :aaa_i{4?i �= MM'�aaaa: a aaa qt }.i: -m a' H �' -ii 7 •aaaa a care aalia'aaaay a '��+,��i#aaa���=.aa aLaaa��zti q reaaa .a a.„'ap .=•aaa a _ =a>. x_a• a4 lappa--»a1a Lua .��_{13i.aaa-aaa.as�as aa-7ma aaa 4• -gin .^.''aaa }:_r^m-rte^ 2 3JM I' ra a4aa�7�.�={. aaaaa=._. ---�qz ••a/i'_^':s: a a^!.�.- -•aa *a_71f 1?{a aS--aaa_ a=«aa P4 asa-a�e7e7=i7na F4' -a+a-vim'?ii ia^ _r.:• a a�{aaaaa 4iim a. ?%ii 4r {{i,{ �aai;�.?�{4+a 4 M-9M� {baa= 4 1aa aha i- a.. a#� ?? i4 4#4a:.: acyl{iiiFa.v9asiiaa {{{aa.a3 has {iia as 7? "r?iii 44 .... 444zZ.:_ ;J#-1#•{_jMAMa?_-•Na_a-{.4aa. aaaa( m ;rya maa •i-'ri M .Y ?'a'-= 4i -0{4i4 a --a a^. r�s.#I{-{n:fa.:aaa� 4.4paa,ran �a••yg.i a aaaa :a42..:aaaaaa^a.:.x.si•ii4 .aaa i74 _ •N a a .1.: 3M 0. --B'i'i -i`11. q { a OF ? r� x.a aaa -trg4.9ii 7{i 4•?4�4 4 •r �a}r-. r�? 4 •a•^3—a-aam- .« =L'.=u -re a•Y re - '� . -w-5`5`i- a a a54"? -6.6C/ [ l56] 3NOHd O01116 VO VNOHOO OOl 3L,�S'31JHC MO1ONVM OaZZ NOINOH'8.1 801 O3avd3Hd . —6-0. MAN -----310Q AS 038Vd3Nd 530NVH0 NV'1d 103fOHd NV'd ONIOYdO 1VnJd37NOD 'C69C-109 761 Wd,� ted . a T P568 it]OL W ITtll WVLM3 O dVIN llld / ino g Lt I e.0 I 51N31N00 ONIMV60 N F 0 f H E o? ¢ s R 1 v !r 5�s a z a a. > 5z aG 3t w $S = wall CL is 0 1111 LU fia 9 jig W �d ck�i I . aHill m5. a?gd a,; a aaaaa] } ?I ? ? ? i; 7i3� ins v ? ? ? ? ? baa..??. ? ]]=,q'}a 4 ]] a b .aa ? a -a i��aa •i?a?? iii??�??ia.{.i: ??aaa- s? aaai�.? iia?ii ??a??4??:iiaaip????ai.i asaa?? ?4??i?aa? �?i4 as asai• iiia? ?? +�?ia3.3d:?. i$4????? ?? ? as777 ??? ? ? 7? 7? ???}aA????141 a}a?a ??? aaa 7q ? ? ? ??a?aia ?4 aI-aaaai ?? .a^,?a 7•aia??i i as .j*aa=a-a-;3L .73.??? 27'7:77?7 777:4??{{ } d? araa7.23a ??aA aF ba-__ i?alai?? iii}.7:i? i=-�.7• a? aaaa A�� a: ]•S•S {? a a 1 a Y? i 3 i 3 3 :Ia.a 7 a ?'? i-�'.� r:Niaahz'3�o-+s{???ai?} �a�, s�9��a`ip{aaa{ 777777-jc�7��-p-aa?aa as oa' a>y.c�aa �?asaa :aaa aaa3�aaa:a,,�,-77777 aa:n:�s�a��ga??? ate? �Gpaa�aa-5� a ? ? ? a ? ? ? ? aaaaa2aaAaaa�»aaxipaaaaaaaala��^....aate� Y7???I't?}?i a:.,a:.aaaanaa aaa=n�.aa -=aaa'A-aa3�i????7??aa ]aaa7W0a..a. q�❑ ,. _77???? ? a j^aaa==za a=j:a 7a :aaa= asrr??y} a as aaaaaM7a a=axa ai 72 �a-y-?Miaa7�7'???? ? =a«a :a2•.. aaaa. :a as{{:.a.a:.i.?? ? aaplaaaaa � 7i• "a�-:t?? :�a a - 9 a,- a.9 7_a =ice?7i ? ?'•???�� ?�.?aaaaa� aa? -•iiia 'r?aaaa7s.ai?? i?"4J3s?:3 a2aaa�i.ii�i iiaaa•a7?.???? ?? 7?????????a aaa=x^7-?777 ??777777???? is 7?????71??? �r?i7? 7 ? a}??? MO � z � 0 C� f Q zzz z xyi a Pzw� V O,_ E- ,0 - o ? ??? ? 22a3a =aa iii??? ?? 3iaa�7 as aaa�= a � - ???74??4 ?#!?????? ?? 2 �Iai2a a7 ] a II aaaa ??? ????? a ???? iii a 77.7777 1 ?????4?? 7 ???77727272] a 77777??? ??477777777] O 7 O,� ??ai ?7{ai7aaa�] U i .taa ar ? ? a?? ?? {a as�? ^a\] - ?;02 aa as a7 a aaa a}} { } a• a 7 ? ?? Tri?a?}iii a• 7 aa: - ? i72aaa® _ �a l 7aaaa ia??7 ianm -' a ?? a>;P?7?7�iabJ^�aiiai`J'aa- ???i a?Y.?All a r aama]taa ?- i? a � 737- i i i � ?•i• +e.a i . a = at ?'�i 4�??}4¢a 1177 n ifii7 ? i?°:??�i?-???iroi ???? ? ?a27?Xaa2 a} iaa a}!{ 777• '?fs-i! ?37473 "-6EL(156) 3NOHd Ofi6Z6'VO •YNONOO ns •3IOHI0 MOIOHVM OBZL N018OH'N'0 H03 O3HVd3Hd ---3100 AS 03HVd3Hd ved oolivzoan 3.15'z r,, -fog P569 M., ON i_ no.. 3N1V1N31 V=ONtl 13V 13 V,N31 NVId SS300V 381d S30NVH0 NVId L33rOHd SLN31NOO ONIMVHO I FI W 65IP O MB 1 .�.. > we <.J a `s s� pJp Z $$;$s W uj _dRE y YI r� •` d ggStnd w la :c o pyS:g�p�y .,.i�I! 11", 611 JaE�.�,� 25- L } — U=3 `.� •_ -'/ wr - ice_ — .,•�;"�/""�� ••.. -• �IJ � t. T � �W.._....1.... ..� ♦�........._..--..-•-•._-sig%i.�-�� �� M �....... _ Ir ♦ 1 ^ • 11 i ..._� -. A_•• .... J 8- _ L ror9EE1I LS61 3NOHd 03BZ8'tlO vWUM 03&airs 310m,:,moloavm07ZZ LY[fu all dVIR 130VVd 311LLYA113A f ,� ., P570 NolaoH'N•0 HOA 03NVd3tld ce-a Or 4" lavtla ;Lu VJJM `` le >! !•' a NVIdSNISVHd e1 = 310 S1N31N07 ON MYtl0 o � a S7:7NYNS M►Id 1031'Otld � a � N AS 03NVd38d 3NIl 3SV9 Z =� NfV< CN jy it I 02 < g._ a ;�e'10 =< r _ Z h -iJq.� —• al � i ' ry - n� I — -T r - r _ = , - F - 1 r— � •1 r� y1 � � L N B ® m`•� l dtt J e` a ■ o co 3 �� 3 - .� �3 r I J I — -' I — I� �• � Y LU — 1. � u• I — .O W i� C3 ' 7 �— '"III II ® 1.: � __ I �.:•�; ® ® ® ® _® 1 Ic 7 C- i�a� STI F ---F .. —1 ... pp m 41mai Q: io m ! I� I �` C I]LEi NWd r I 3 z • 5 Q ,----------_— O`dOLJ 3NI13SVS 1 1----------------------- r at LD I 49 a 49 1 j 17 y db 13 9 _ 3 1 � 1 1 }5�_ s �► �— ------------------------------------------ , b� 41,11 1 EXHIBIT J P571 r'� g.a3�Ee3 .33�Ya a F Z JU EL WU 1311 MU i v: y a to mom. S kx_"t E Ift Z T z s _It E— z U U Q I� Q J C 4*k* U z U 0 z E— z U U Q I� Q J C 4*k* s 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 'r 1 1 1 } 1 i 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 14 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � 1 1 1 1 1 ■ . 1 a � 1 9W 001,6 BJ _ 1 z, ;------------- r-------� Li U 1 1 ' 1 1 > a L-------------1----------------------_--� _3 = on_ zr aFP - y N ani a N 333 da s 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 'r 1 1 1 } 1 i 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 14 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � 1 1 1 1 1 ■ . 1 a � 1 9W 001,6 BJ _ 1 Li U 1 1 1 > a L-------------1----------------------_--� P573 ________________________________ GVOM 3f� II;;V9 RESTAURANT IL 0', e ---------------------- R. a fia. s � k Q Q © I R I � 1 1 ® p is i I gFF _1 < A 1 'i RESTAURANT 1. I . 57 _ ------- ----------------- ---------------- F- C El G I 1 I 1 1 � 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1.1 tl' 0574 1 sz 1 _ — 1 — �3:'- 1 _ _ ------- ----------------- ---------------- F- C El G I 1 I 1 1 � 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1.1 tl' 0574 P575 S=y C7 }i s _ L x 1Y —�-----------------------------I R�� 1 , 1 •� 1 1 I 1 I 1 ce 1 1 1 • . 1 y, � I 1 O k I- U Yir- 4• . ; U k ! .� 1 k II • I � o, = 1 1 � e 1 1 � L ------------- — Ctl a la� 1 1 � �t ' 7j", -----:- 3X----------------' 4 z = �n 7UYI7 1 � , Q 1 1 < 1 1 , ; 0 ~ 1 z ' i O C 1 , ' O k zl xa , o ' '---------------------- -------------- -------- -------- -------------------------¢ IZ U Z �JO m \ ( ; / / . § S. �! / ' .t! < .!! » •;EZ = - � r - I lq 19.1c 4 N Q z Q C L w C U z O W � � a L' � Q U � W �v O U .x 21578 t x = 3 Lt1 <^ �L= Lol S �S GLLI 'yam Q 21578 Q Lt1 <^ �L= Lol S GLLI 'yam Q °O m �LE C z o '�I v 21578 Rx i S S �lo�t r�l .t 1 ai 0 m AO N fir.. 579 s? 3g a02 3 � 3 c C W� C � W tl jr4 IL .n•,a U F .A 0 P580 z x i ----------------------------- EEII .-1 a i '1 rtEsuuwrrt2 � i = .. r 'If i 3jV.11 a IT . r ;7-'�*--..-.- ....... m wl TiF-cF ; 1 1 1 1 r 1 O 1 N 1 1 1 w a 1 1 - a r r i $RgYi 1 1 a l ; ti •h !Z5 m m 1 1 m T------ CIO- ---- 1 SFV Y �` W � 1 '•'1+1 l; Z ZO �,'j � • ; � �y � y� � 4 ;.: w u i �1 — Q 1 1 > i d 1 1 J ¢ i m Fl �'----------------1 'j -� 'l "Z Y LU Ix � ^�f 1--; _ �-- w l 1 � � Y----•� <; 1 f I ( 1 = 1 1 1 1 xw 1 _ 1olkO � 1 spa ■ ip • 1 1 1 1 1 1 —�------------ ---'--------------------------------- 1 --t Ir 1 O I xa 1 1�' ■; 1---------------------------------------------------------1 Con W P581 ryrr-tiL- I U� ALU I I - I .vv r.in. DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTION AGENDA RAINS ROOM CITY HALL 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE A. CALL TO ORDER Roll Call: Ray Wimberly X 7.00 P.M. Rich Macias X Candyce Burnett Donald Granger X Alternates: Lou Munoz Rich Fletcher Francisco Oaxaca Additional Staff Present: Mike Smith, Senior Planner; Dominick Perez, Associate Planner; Nikki Cavazos, Assistant Planner B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS None This is the time and place for the general public to address the Committee on any item listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Committee from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Committee may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Staff Coordinator, depending upon the number of individuals embers of the audience. This is a professional businessmeeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. C. PROJECT REVIEW ITEMS The following items will be presented by the applicant and/or their representatives. Each presentation and resulting period of Committee comment is limited to 20 minutes. Following each presentation, the Committee will address major issues and make recommendations with respect to the project proposal. The Design Review Committee acts as an advisory Committee to the Planning Commission. Their recommendations will be forwarded to the Planning Commission as applicable. The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Committee may open the meeting for public input. P r (. I I q' �(J�� Page 1 of 4 EXHIBIT K J"%r-r[11- 1 Vi LV 1 / - / .VV r'.M. DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTION AGENDA RAINS ROOM CITY HALL 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE acres of land in the Victoria Community Plan (VCP) within the Mixed Use District related to the construction of a mixed use project consisting of 380 residential units, a 71 room hotel and two restaurant pads totaling 12,000 square feet, located at the southwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road - APN: 1090-331-05. Related Files: Preliminary Review DRC2015-01102, Pre Application Review DRC2016-00142, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19762, Conditional Use Permit DRC2016-00449, Design Review DRC2016-00450, Uniform Sign Program DRC2016-00451, Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRC2016- 00452 and Minor Exception DRC2016-00508. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2016-00450 - DR HORTON - A request for site plan and architectural review in the Victoria Community Plan (VCP) within the Mixed Use District related to the construction of a mixed use project consisting of 380 residential units, a 71 room hotel and two restaurant pads totaling 12,000 square feet, located at the southwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road - APN: 1090-331-05. Related Files: Preliminary Review DRC2015-01102, Pre Application Review DRC2016-00142, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19762, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20032, Conditional Use Permit DRC2016-00449, Uniform Sign Program DRC2016-00451, Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRC2016-00452 and Minor Exception DRC2016-00508. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM DRC2016-00451 - DR HORTON - A request for a Uniform Sign Program in the Victoria Community Plan (VCP) within the Mixed Use District related to the construction of a mixed use project consisting of 380 residential units, a 71 room hotel and two restaurant pads totaling 12,000 square feet, located at the southwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road - APN: 1090-331-05. Related Files: Preliminary Review DRC2015-01102, Pre Application Review DRC2016-00142, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19762, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20032, Conditional Use Permit DRC2016-00449, Design Review DRC2016-00450, Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRC2016-00452 and Minor Exception DRC2016-00508. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. The Committee recommended approval subject to the following; Village A: For the 3 story Townhome Rowhome on all 5, 6, or 7 plex buildings and elevation schemes, additional materials and elements shall be added to the front and rear elevations that are appropriate to the Craftsman -inspired design. Materials shall include the following as appropriate: board and batten and lap siding, introducing brick, additional amounts of shingle siding, and windows appropriate to the architectural style. Village D: For all plans and architectural styles, additional materials and elements shall be added that are appropriate to each style to achieve the 360 degree architecture requirement. For the Craftsman and Shingle styles, materials shall include board and batten siding, shingle siding, brick or rock, lap siding. For the Santa Barbara and Italianate style, materials and features shall include elements and architectural vocabulary that Page 3 of 4 P584 DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:00 p.m. Donald Granger April 18, 2017 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19762 - DR HORTON - A request to subdivide 28.4 acres of land into 4 parcels in the Victoria Community Plan (VCP) within the Mixed Use District related to the construction of a mixed use project consisting of 380 residential units, a 71 room hotel and two restaurant pads totaling 12,000 square feet, located at the southwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road - APN: 1090-331-05. Related Files: Preliminary Review DRC2015-01102, Pre Application Review DRC2016-00142, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20032, Conditional Use Permit DRC2016-00449, Design Review DRC2016-00450, Uniform Sign Program DRC2016-00451, Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRC2016-00452 and Minor Exception DRC2016-00508. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT20032 - DR HORTON - A request for a residential condominium subdivision for 380 residential units on 28.4 acres of land in the Victoria Community Plan (VCP) within the Mixed Use District related to the construction of a mixed use project consisting of 380 residential units, a 71 room hotel and two restaurant pads totaling 12,000 square feet, located at the southwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road - APN: 1090-331-05, Related Files: Preliminary Review DRC2015-01102, Pre Application Review DRC2016-00142, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19762, Conditional Use Permit DRC2016-00449, Design Review DRC2016-00450, Uniform Sign Program DRC2016-00451, Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRC2016- 00452 and Minor Exception DRC2016-00508. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2016-00450 - DR HORTON - A request for site plan and architectural review in the Victoria Community Plan (VCP) within the Mixed Use District related to the construction of a mixed use project consisting of 360 residential units, a 71 room hotel and two restaurant pads totaling 12,000 square feet, located at the southwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road - APN: 1090-331-05. Related Files: Preliminary Review DRC2015-01102, Pre Application Review DRC2016-00142, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19762, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20032, Conditional Use Permit DRC2016-00449, Uniform Sign Program DRC2016-00451, Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRC2016-00452 and Minor Exception DRC2016-00508. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM DRC2016-00451 - DR HORTON - A request for a Uniform Sign Program in the Victoria Community Plan (VCP) within the Mixed Use District related to the construction of a mixed use project consisting of 380 residential units, a 71 room hotel and two restaurant pads totaling 12,000 square feet, located at the southwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road - APN: 1090-331-05, Related Files: Preliminary Review DRC2015-01102, Pre Application Review DRC2016-00142, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19762, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20032, Conditional Use Permit DRC2016-00449, Design Review DRC2016-00450, Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRC2016-00452 and Minor Exception DRC2016-00508. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. BACKGROUND Preliminary Review: In November of 2015, DR Horton filed a Preliminary Review Application with staff to receive Design and Technical comments for the proposed 28.4 acre mixed-use project. Following receipt of staffs Design and Technical comments and a couple of meetings Item C4-1 P585 DRC COMMENTS TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19762, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT20032, DESIGN REVIEW DRC2016-00450, UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM DRC2016-00451 — DR NORTON April 18, 2017 Page 3 SURROUNDING AREA The project site is bordered by Base Line Road along the north boundary; Day Creek Boulevard along the east boundary; a 16.8 acre single-family neighborhood zoned Mixed Use/ Single - Family (4-6 units/acre) that is developed at 4.8 dwelling units/acre within the Victoria Arbors Master Plan in the VCP west of Day Creek Boulevard, between Church Street and the south boundary of the project; and a Southern California Edison transmission corridor zoned Open Space and the Day Creek Flood Control channel zoned Flood Control along the west boundary. Across Base Line Road at the northwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road is a future neighborhood shopping center that will be anchored by Stater Brothers that is currently under construction, and across Day Creek Boulevard at the southeast corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road is an existing neighborhood center anchored by Sprouts Farmer's Market. GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING General Plan and Zoning: The project site has a General Plan Land Use Designation of Mixed Use; however, the site is currently zoned Regionally Related Office/Commercial (RROC), within the Victoria Community Plan (VCP). The General Plan Land Use Designation of Mixed Use occurred with the 2001 General Plan update and remained Mixed Use in the 2010 General Plan update. The Victoria Community Plan was adopted in 1981 and according to staff research has been zoned Regionally Related/ Office Commercial since VCP's 1981 adoption. Zoning: The applicant has submitted a Victoria Community Plan Amendment to change the Victoria Community Plan Zoning Designation from RROC to Mixed Use (MU) in order to be consistent with the goals and objectives of the General Plan. When the Victoria Community Plan was first approved, Mixed Use was not included as a land use category. CIRCULATION AND SITE PLANNING Circulation: Regarding access and intersection alignment, the proposed project is anticipated to be compatible with streets and intersections in the surrounding area. The applicant has designed the project so that access will be from three points: one on Base Line Road that will be signalized and align with the driveway to the future Stater Brothers neighborhood center at the northwest corner of Base Line Road and Day Creek Boulevard; one right -in and right -out off Day Creek Boulevard; and one signalized entry off Day Creek Boulevard that will align with the existing signal at Madrigal Place. The primary access point off Day Creek Boulevard will feature a drive aisle that utilizes decorative pavement with a landscaped median that is framed by trees on either side. The project is also designed with an emergency vehicle access point along Day Creek Boulevard south of the signalized entrance at Madrigal Place. Site Planning: The project features two primary plaza areas that are accessible by both residents and hotel and retail patrons. The Village Plaza is located just south of the drive aisle adjacent to the hotel and will feature decorative pavers in the drive aisle flanked by twin fountains with tree plantings, colored concrete that will be coordinated with the drive aisle pavers in a running bond pattern, a raised stage for community performances with a retractable movie screen, lounge area and seat walls. At the corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road, the Village Center has been designed as a publicly accessible focal point. The plaza will be shared by the two restaurants and will feature a central fountain, decorative paving, accent trees, fountain, overhead trellis structures, colored concrete and an architectural tower that pedestrians can pass through. Item C4-3 P586 DRC COMMENTS TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19762, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT20032, DESIGN REVIEW ORC2016-00450, UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM DRC2016-00451 — DR HORTON April 18, 2017 Page 5 Amenities: The Development Code requires a total of seven recreational amenities for a 380 unit residential project. As proposed, the project is providing a total of 9 amenities, comprised of six passive areas and three active amenities. The passive amenities are designed for sitting, reading, conversation and outdoor eating, and include two plazas, three outdoor seating/lounge areas and one paseo with a connecting walkway trail near the core of the project that links one plaza and one seating area. The primary plaza in the residential area features a retractable movie screen, raised staged area, a lounge area, colored concrete with medallion and pavers, and raised seat walls. One plaza has a dual age tot lot, picnic tables and low walls that define the space. Two of the outdoor lounge areas are designed with suspended lighting, steel patterned screen walls, planter areas, low walls, and I -beams that will frame each seating area. For active amenities, the project is designed with three areas for physical activity: 1) pool/ spa/ cabana area; 2) linear park and 3) double bocce court. The pool/ spa area will feature outdoor dining areas, barbeques, large potted plants, trees and a restroom building. The linear park is designed with a walking path, a pedestrian plaza with a shaded seating area, three outdoor exercise stations, and a decomposed granite path. Although the linear park will be privately maintained, it will be accessible to the public. The double bocce courts feature shade and poured in place colored concrete seat walls. Open Space: The Development Code requires that the townhome provide a minimum of 150 square feet of open space per unit, with a minimum depth of 6 feet. Open space may be provide in the form decks or balconies. All of the townhome units comply with these requirements. Landscape: Landscape standards for mixed use projects are governed by a combination of standards from the Mixed Use District and standards from Residential Districts for multi -family projects. For landscape calculations, the density for the project equates to 13.4 dwelling units/acre based upon the 28.4 acre project area. Per Section 17.56.070 of the Development Code, the following are the landscape standards for projects with density ranges between 14-24 units/acre: 45 trees per gross acre shall be planted, with the following percentages of sizes: 10% shall be 36 -inch box or larger; 10% shall be 24 -inch box or larger; and 80% shall be 15 - gallon sized. Mixed Use projects required that 10% of the overall net area be landscape. For the residential area, 19.3 acres are allocated to multi -family product, and 5.5 acres to single- family product. The project has 87 24 -inch box trees, 67 36 -inch box trees and 745 15 -gallon size trees, for a grand total of 919 trees, exceeding the minimum requirement of 871 trees (45 x 19.36 acres). For landscape area, the minimum requirement is 2.84 acres (10%), and the project is providing 4.57 acres of landscape area. For all landscape standards (tree sizes and landscape area), the project either meets or exceeds the minimum standards. COMMERCIAL and HOTEL ARCHITECTURE Restaurant Pads: The architectural vocabulary for the restaurant pads and hotel is Santa Barbara inspired. Exterior features and materials include arches, tile insets, tile roofs, colonnades, recessed niches, awnings, curvilinear elements, and fenestration choices that enhance visual interest. Roof top equipment will be screened by the parapets. Each restaurant is 6,000 square feet, and the height of each building is 25 feet. Both restaurants are designed with a covered outdoor dining area. Hotel: Complimenting the restaurant buildings, the hotel evokes Santa Barbara -inspired design. Key architectural features include awnings, tile insets, ceramic tile elements, curvilinear parapets, French doors, decorative wood siding at key locations, medallions, exposed rafters, Item C4-5 P587 DRC COMMENTS TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19762, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT20032, DESIGN REVIEW DRC2016-00450, UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM DRC2016-00451 — DR HORTON April 18, 2017 Page 7 Setbacks: For Mixed Use projects, setbacks are determined at the following formula: 50-75% of the standard streetscape setback. Base Line Road and Day Creek Boulevard are classified as Major Divided Arterials. Accordingly, the minimum building setbacks (measured from ultimate curb face) are the following for each land use type: a. Detached single-family: 11.25 to 22.5 feet. b. Attached single-family/ multi -family: 11.25 to 22.5 feet. c. Commercial: 11.25 to 22.5 feet. All of the project's proposed setbacks are in compliance with the standards for Mixed Use projects. Along Day Creek Boulevard the setbacks range from 13 to 23 feet for the hotel, 14 to 17 feet for the restaurant, and 22 feet for the attached townhomes. Along Day Creek Boulevard, the setback for the restaurant is 21 feet, the attached townhomes are plotted from 18 to 21 feet from the curb, and the detached single-family condos are plotted from 24 to 31 feet from the curb. UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM The applicant has submitted a Uniform Sign Program for the project in order to provide a cohesive sign architecture for the hotel, two restaurants and project entry signage for the residential portion. Commercial Signage: The monument signs (one on Day Creek and one on Base Line) are designed to match stucco color and texture of the hotel and restaurant buildings. The signs also feature tile roof and recessed tile to match the hotel and restaurant buildings. The sign height and area are compliant with the Development Code regulations. Each restaurant includes provisions for two wall signs, all of which are compliant with the area and quantity requirements. Residential Proiect Identification Signs: The project includes a 6 -foot high project identification sign at the primary entry off Day Creek Boulevard. The sign will have adjacent landscaping, designed with pinned steel letters attached to 24 -inch by 48 -inch stone/tile veneer walls and illumination will be backlight. The height and sign area meet the Code requirements. NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING SUMMARY#1 DR Horton conducted a neighborhood meeting on Wednesday, August 24, 2016 at Victoria Windrows Elementary School at 6855 Victoria Park Lane, from 6:30 p.m. to 8:30 p.m. for the proposed project. Approximately 60-65 people attended the meeting. DR Horton presented an overview of the project, which was then followed by a question and answer period. The meeting lasted approximately two hours, and residents raised a variety of concerns regarding the proposed project. The issues raised by the residents at the neighborhood meeting that are germane to the scope of the review by the Design Review Committee are summarized below, along with any revisions or updates that have been made to the project since the meeting. 1. Hotel: Residents did not feel the hotel is a compatible land use in a predominately residential, neighborhood commercial area. Residents stated that hotels belong at VG or on Foothill Boulevard. Residents were also concerned about crime and other activities occurring at the hotel that are undesirable. Item C4-7 P588 DRC COMMENTS - TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19762, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT20032, DESIGN REVIEW DRC2016-00450, UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM DRC2016-00451 — DR HORTON April 18, 2017 Page 9 changed from side -on to rear -on to match the orientation of the neighborhood to the south; setbacks remain the same, ranging from 18 to 22 feet. 5. Additional Single -Family Units: Residents to the east, across Day Creek Boulevard, would like to see single-family homes plotted along Day Creek, not townhomes. Residents indicated that the Day Creek frontage should match the streetscape on east side of Day Creek Boulevard with single-family homes. Update: Between the primary driveway to the project off Day Creek Boulevard and the detached condos, the initial site plan proposed two buildings of six-plex attached townhomes. The applicant has since redesigned the project to reduce the massing by plotting 9 townhomes in three buildings of three-plex units. 6. Overall Density: Residents from the neighborhood to the south noted that the project is too dense. The neighborhood to the south is built at 4.8 dwelling units/acre. Residents did not offer up a specific acceptable density for the overall project, but stressed again that the southerly density range of 25% of the project site should be very close to their neighborhood. Update: The initial project site was for 392 units at 15.7 units to the acre; the update site plan indicates 380 units at 15.3 units to the acre. 7. Privacy: Residents from the neighborhood to the south are very concerned that with DR Norton's project having 18 to 22 -foot setbacks along the south edge, their privacy into their bedrooms and back yards will be compromised. Update: The developer has redesigned the project so that the southerly edge condition has a 60 -foot wide linear park that functions as a buffer along a substantial portion of the south boundary. For the remaining five single-family detached condos at the southwest corner of the site, the plotting has been changed from side -on to rear -on. NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING SUMMARY#2 The applicant conducted a second neighborhood on Monday, March 27, 2017 at Etiwanda Gardens at 7576 Etiwanda Avenue from 6:30 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. DR Horton made a presentation of the revised updates as noted in the above summary for Neighborhood Meeting #1, and staff from DR Horton, City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning and Engineering Department and the Sheriff's Department were available for questions. In summary, residents appreciated the revisions made by the applicant, but still expressed concern over the following issues that are relevant to the scope of the review by the Design Review Committee: 1. Land use/ hotel: Several residents continued to indicate that the hotel is not a compatible land use in a predominately residential, neighborhood commercial area. Residents stated that hotels sometimes are locations for illegal activities, and that hotels are better suited along Foothill Boulevard. Residents were also concerned about crime and other activities occurring at the hotel that are undesirable. Response: A Sheriff's deputy attended the community meeting and indicated that the police have not seen significant increase or correlation in crime associated with hotels in the City. The Sheriff's deputy indicated that the deputies are available to work with hotel Item C4-9 P589 DRC COMMENTS TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19762, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT20032, DESIGN REVIEW DRC2016-00450, UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM DRC2016-00451 — DR HORTON April 18, 2017 Page 11 area. Staffs evaluation of the architecture for the hotel and two restaurant buildings is very positive and that the architectural vocabulary is well -executed. In order to meet the City's 360 degree architecture requirement for the residential product, staff recommends the following revisions: Maior Issues: 1, Village A: For the 3 story Townhome Rowhome on all 5, 6, or 7 plex buildings and elevation schemes, add additional materials and elements to the front and rear elevations that are appropriate to the Craftsman -inspired design. Consider adding additional amounts of the following as appropriate: board and batten and lap siding, introducing brick, additional amounts of shingle siding, and windows appropriate to the architectural style. 2. Village D: For all plans and architectural styles, add additional materials and elements that are appropriate to each style to achieve the 360 degree architecture requirement. For the Craftsman and Shingle styles, some options to consider are adding board and batten siding, shingle siding, brick or rock, lap siding. For the Santa Barbara and Italianate style, additional design elements and architectural vocabulary should be authentic to the style and placed on the wall plane appropriately in order to meet the 360 design requirement. Avoid tacked on elements that are out -of -place or not true to the style. Particular attention should be directed to enhancing the front and rear elevations. In addition to providing 360 degree architecture, staff recommendations the following specific design changes: • Plans 1 B, 1C and 1D: Rework the locations of the 3 -inch plaster recess to reflect each style in an authentic manner. As shown, the locations appear awkward and not well -executed. • Plans 2A, 2B and 2D: With the exception of the first floor on Plans 28 and 2D, rework the locations of the 3 -inch plaster recess to reflect each style in authentic manner. As shown, the locations appear awkward and not well -executed. • Plans 3B, 3C and 3D: Rework the locations of the 3 -inch plaster recess to reflect each style in an authentic manner. As shown, the locations appear awkward and not well -executed. Secondary Issues: All Villages: All garage doors should be appropriate and enhance the architectural style. Recognize garage doors as an element of design rhythm and use to create varying patterns. Avoid selecting standard doors with no design features. Revise the units with standard garage doors to have features that reflect and compliment the architectural style. In addition, doors that allow natural light are encouraged. 2. Linear nark: The developer should provide an update on any changes that were made in response to the comments received at the community meetings, with particular attention to adding an area large enough with turf for active recreation, and other low intensity, active amenities, such as bocce ball or horse shoes. Staff Recommendation: With the above issues addressed to the satisfaction of the Committee, staff recommends that the Committee move the project forward to the Planning Commission for review. Item C4-11 `PC,uImITOT EXHIBIT L ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: 1090-331-05 TOTAL ACREAGE: 28.44 ACRES EXISTING ZONING: REGIONALLY RELATED OFFICE / COMMERCIAL 0 (NMADOLE • Engin WrW Cmmunitks for Life P590 9302 PRT98URCH AVE WM 230 RANCHO CUCAMONOq CA. 91730 PHONE 909.4816322 FAX: 909.4816320 W m 11 o rj FxHIBIT M it,MADOLE IN &Whw nn8 Comm mig a for L►% 9302 PRTSBURGH AVE., SURE 230 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 9MD PHONE 909.4816322 FAX: 909.4816320 ENVIRONMENTAL sy INFORMATION FORM (Part I - Initial Study) RANCHO (Please type or print clearly using ink. Use the tab key to move from one line to the next line.) C;UCAMONGA Planning Department (909) 477-2750 The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed project so that the City may review the project pursuant to City Policies, Ordinances, and Guidelines; the California Environmental Quality Act; and the City's Rules and Procedures to Implement CEQA. It is important that the information requested in this application be provided in full. Upon review of the completed Initial Study Part I and the development application, additional information such as, but not limited to, traffic, noise, biological, drainage, and geological reports may be required. The project application will not be deemed complete unless the identified special studies/reports are submitted for review and accepted as complete and adequate. The project application will not be scheduled for Committees' review unless all required reports are submitted and deemed complete for staff to prepare the Initial Study Part II as required by CEQA. In addition to the filing fee, the applicant will be responsible to pay or reimburse the City, its agents, officers, and/or consultants for all costs for the preparation, review, analysis, recommendations, mitigations, etc., of any special studies or reports. INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED. Please note that it is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the application is complete at the time of submittal, City staff will not be available to perform work required to provide missing information. Application Number for the project to which this form pertains: Project Title: DAY CREEK SQUARE SUBTPM 19762/CEQA2016-00012 Name &Address of project owner(s): MR. PETER PIEROTTI 11 FIELDING ROAD, LADUE, MO 63124 Name & Address of developer or project sponsor D.R. HORTON LOS ANGELES HOLDING COMPANY, INC. 2280 WARDLOW CIRCLE, CORONA, CA 92880 'pc, �q -�uiq EXHIBIT N Pagel of 10 P593 Contact Person & Address: DANIEL BOYD, VICE PRESIDENT - ENTITLEMENTS 2280 WARDLOW CIRCLE, CA 92880 Name & Address of person preparing this form (if different from above): Telephone Number. 951-739-5444 (DIRECT) EMAIL: Dboyd@drhorton.com Information indicated by an asterisk (") is not required of non -construction CUP's unless otherwise requested by staff. "1) Provide a full scale (8-1/2 x 11) copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which includes the project site, and indicate the site boundaries. 2) Provide a set of color photographs that show representative views into the site from the north, south, east, and west; views into and from the site from the primary access points that serve the site; and representative views of significant features from the site. Include a map showing location of each photograph. 3) Project Location (describe): SWC OF DAY CREEK BLVD., AND BASE LINE ROAD Township 1 South, range 6 West, primarily within the NWC quarter of the NW quarter of Section 6 of USGS. 4) Assessor's Parcel Numbers (attach additional sheet if necessary): APN: 1090-331-05 'S) Gross Site Area (ac/sq. ft.): 28.44 ACRES/1,238,846 SQ/FT '6) Net Site Area (total site size minus area of public streets & proposed 24.93 ACRES (3.51 ACRES IS dedications): COMMERCIAL) 7) Describe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change which would affect the project site (attach additional sheet if necessary): SUBTTM20032; CUP2016-00449;DRC2016-00452; MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2016-00508; DESIGN REVIEW DRC2016-00450; UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM DRC2016-00451; PLANNED COMMUNITY DRC2016-00452; MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2016-0058; CEQA REVIEW CEQA2016-00012 Updated 4/11/2013 Page 2 of 10 P594 8) Include a description of all permits which will be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental agencies in order to fully implement the project: IN ADDITION TO THOSE APPLICATIONS LISTED ABOVE UNDER SECTION 7, ALL RELATED BUILDING PERMITS, DEVELOPMENT PERMIT, INCLUDING TRIBAL CONSULTATION SB18/AB52SITE 9) Describe the physical setting of the site as it exists before the project including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on site (including age and condition) and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of significant features described. In addition, cite all sources of information (i. e., geological and/or hydrologic studies, biotic and archeological surveys, traffic studies): SITE HAS BEEN HISTORICALLY DISTURBED FROM PRIOR BULLDOZING AND WEED ABATEMENT. SITE HAS BEEN USED AS A DUMP SITE IN WHICH CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS, CONCRETE, AND OTHER MATERIALS ON SITE. THE PROJECT AREA SEDIMENT CONSISTS OF DECOMPOSING GRANTIC SAND. GRAVEL AND ROCK. SEDIMENT CHARACTERIZED AS QUATERNARY ALLUVIAL WASH/VERY YOUNG ALLUVIAL FAN DEPOSITS. Updated 4/11/2013 Page 3 of 10 P595 10) Describe the known cultural and/or historical aspects of the site. Cite all sources of information (books, published reports and oral history): Please see attachment (Section 10) - Narrative affixed. 11) Describe any noise sources and their levels that now affect the site (aircraft, roadway noise, etc.) and how they will affect proposed uses: Refer to results of Noise Impacts Survey prepared by LSA. 12) Describe the proposed project in detail. This should provide an adequate description of the site in terms of ultimate use that will result from the proposed project. Indicate if there are proposed phases for development, the extent of development to occur with each phase, and the anticipated completion of each increment. Attach additional sheet(s) if necessary: PROPOSAL INCLUDES A TOTAL OF 380 RESIDENTIAL UNITS CONSISTING OF 51 SFD COURTYARD HOMES AND 329 3 -STORY ROWHOMES. THE PROPOSAL WILL ALSO INCLUDE A 3 -STORY HOTEL AND TWO RESTAURANT PADS. THE HOTEL IS APPROXIMATELY 45,932 SQUARE FEET. THE RESTUARANT PADS ARE 5,947 AND 5,857 SQUARE FEET RESPECTFULLY. THE PROJECT WILL BE GRADED IN A SINGLE PHASE INCLUDING THE PRIVATE & PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE SUPPORTING THE PROJECT. THE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOMPENT RESIDENTIAL SALES WILL BE PHASED OVER A PERIOD OF THREE YEARS DEPENDING UPON MARKET CONDITIONS. 13) Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one -family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.) and scale of development (height, frontage, setback, rear yard, etc.): SITE IS SURROUNDED TO THE NORTH BY A PROPOSED NEIGHBORHOOD SHOPPING CENTER BY LEWIS DEVELOPMENT. SOURTH THERE ARE EXISTING SINGE -FAMILY HOMES; WEST OF THE SITE IS AN OPEN FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL AND TO THE EAST EXISTING COMMERCIAL AND RETAIL. (REFER TO SITE PLAN FOR SET BACKS AND OTHER DIMENSIONS) Updated 4/11/2013 Page 4 of 10 P596 14) Will the proposed project change the pattem, scale, or character of the surrounding general area of the project? NO. THE SITE IS CONSIDERED A LARGE IN -FILL SURROUNDED BY RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL & RETAIL (EXISTING). THE SITE IS DESIGNATED AS MIX -USE IN THE GENERAL PLAN. THE SITE IS VACANT AND IS SURROUNDED BY OPEN FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL AND MAJOR ROADWAY SYSTEMS FINANCED BY A CFD. 15) Indicate the type of short-term and long-term noise to be generated, including source and amount. How will these noise levels affect adjacent properties and on-site uses? What methods of soundproofing are proposed? REFER TO LSA NOISE IMPACT ANALYSIS PREPARED BY URBAN CROSSROADS FOR FULL ANALYSIS AND REFERENCE. `16) Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenic trees: REFER TO ARBORIST REPORT PREPARED THAT DESCRIBES THE EXISTING DEGRADED AND CONSIDERED LOW VALUE TREES ON SITE (APPROXIMATELY 3-5 TREES) 17) Indicate any bodies of water (including domestic water supplies) into which the site drains: THE SITE DOES NOT DRAIN INTO A BODY OF WATER. THE RUNOFF FROM THE DEVELOPED SITE WILL DRAIN INTO AN EXISTING CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STORM DRAIN SYSTEM SIZED TO ACCEPT 100 YEAR STORM EVENT FLOWS. 18) Indicate expected amount of water usage. (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification, please contact the Cucamonga Valley Water District at (909) 987-2591. 352 a. Residential (gal/day) 10,Peak use (gal/Day) 150,528 b. Commercial/Ind. (gal/day/ac) 14,328 Peak use (gal/min/ac) 21,492 19) Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal. ❑ Septic Tank x❑ Sewer. If septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests. If discharge to a sanitary sewage system is proposed indicate expected daily sewage generation: (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification, please contact the Cucamonga Valley Water District at (909) 987-2591. 74780 a. Residential (gal/day) 6669 b. Commercial/Industrial (gal/day/ac) Updated 4/11/2013 Page 5 of 10 P597 RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20) Number of residential units: 380 Detached (indicate range of parcel sizes, minimum lot size and maximum lot size: PROPOSAL INCLUDES 51 SFD DETACHED HOMES AND 329 ATTACHED MULIT-FAMILY HOMES DESIGNED WITHIN A CONDOMINIUM SUBDIVISION PLAN. Attached (indicate whether units are rental or for sale units): OF THE TOTAL 380 UNITS, 329 ARE ATTACHED 21) Anticipated range of sale prices and/or rents: Sale Price300,000 s) $ to $ 400,000 Rent (per month) $n/a to $ 22) Specify number of bedrooms by unit type: Product A (3 -story Rowhomes w/ Tandems) provides for 49 two -bedrooms & 78 three -bedrooms. Product B (3 -Story Rowhomes) provides for 45 two -bedrooms & 91 three -bedrooms. Product C (3 Story MF Court) provides for 66 three -bedrooms. Product D (2 Story SFD Court) provides for 94 two -bedrooms, 235 three -bedrooms and 51 five -bedrooms. 23) Indicate anticipated household size by unit type: Product A from 1279 to 1474 square feet; Product B from 1549 to 1862 square feet; Product C 1883-2192 square feet. And Product D 2177-2333 square feet. (All square footages are approximately and subject to change slightly in the final design stages) 24) Indicate the expected number of school children who will be residing within the project. Contact the appropriate School Districts as shown in Attachment 8: a. Elementary: b. Junior High: 50 c. Senior High COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL, AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Describe type of use(s) and major function(s) of commercial, industrial or institutional uses: The proposal includes two (2) restaurant pads that total 11,804 square feet (No.1 5947 & No.2 5857) - A 71 room (3 -story) hotel is planned that includes approximately 45,932 square feet. Updated 4/11/2013 Page 6 of 10 P598 26) Total floor area of commercial, industrial, or institutional uses by type. Botique Hotel = 45,932 sq. ft. Restaurant 1 located on Day Creek = 5,947 sq. ft. Restaurant 2 located on Base Line = 5,857 sq. ft. 27) Indicate hours of operation: The hotel will operate 7 days a week and will be open 24 hours a day. The restaurants will typically be open for lunch and dinner dining and its anticipated hours of operation will be between 1lam and 1:30pm seven days a week. 28) Number of employees: Total: Hotel estimated between 10-15 EMP/Reest 10-15 EMP Maximum Shin: Anticipated 8 -hour shifts Time of Maximum Shift: Anticipated 10 -hour shifts 29) Provide breakdown of anticipated job classifications, including wage and salary ranges, as well as an indication of the rate of hire for each classification (attach additional sheet if necessary): TBD 30) Estimation of the number of workers to be hired that currently reside in the City: Estimated 50%/50% '31) For commercial and industrial uses only, indicate the source, type, and amount of air pollution emissions. (Data should be verified through the South Coast Air Quality Management District, at (818) 572-6283): NA ALL PROJECTS 32) Have the water, sewer, fire, and flood control agencies serving the project been contacted to determine their ability to provide adequate service to the proposed project? If so, please indicate their response. All required "Will -Serve" Committments will be obtained and all Agencies will be contacted during the Public Notification and comment period as required under CEQA. Updated 4/11/2013 Page 7 of 10 P599 33) In the known history of this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials? Examples of hazardous and/or toxic materials include, but are not limited to PCB's; radioactive substances; pesticides and herbicides; fuels, oils, solvents, and other flammable liquids and gases. Also note underground storage of any of the above. Please list the materials and describe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, it known. Unknown to Applicant - Refer to technical studies provided 34) Will the proposed project involve the temporary orlong-term use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials, including but not limited to those examples listed above? If yes, provide an inventory of all such materials to be used and proposed method of disposal. The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the application plans. No 35) The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fee. The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission/Planning Director hearing: 1 hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for adequate evaluation of this project to the best of my ability, that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct tot he best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additio I information maybe required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the City of Rancho Cucamon�a. i Date: 4/21/17 Signature: Title: VP Entitlements Updated 4/11/2013 Page 8 of 10 P600 ATTACHMENT PART 1— INITIAL STUDY QUESTION 10 RESPONSE: A cultural resource record search and survey identified no prehistoric or historic resources within the Project Area (Cultural Resource Report — LSA- May 2, 2016). As well, a fossil locality search and survey identified no significant paleontological resources directly within the project area. Geologically, project area sediment is characterized as Very Young Alluvial Fan Deposits that no paleontological sensitivity and although Plesitocene deposits that have a high paleontological sensitivity are located at a depth in the project area, excavation for project construction activities will not be deep enough to encounter these deposits (Paleontological Resource Report LSA — May 2016). As such, it is unlikely that project construction will encounter prehistoric, historic, or fossil resources. P601 1_'%6f_T63:IJil=1►`dV_W CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTIMATED WATER USE AND SEWER FLOWS FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT (Data Provided by Cucamonga Valley Water District February 2003) Water Usage Single -Family Multi -Family Neighborhood Commercial General Commercial Office Professional Institutional/Government Industrial Park Large General Industrial Heavy Industrial (distribution) Sewer Flows Single -Family Multi -Family General Commercial Office Professional Industrial Park Large General Industrial Heavy Industrial (distribution) 705 gallons per EDU per day 256 gallons per EDU per day 1000 gal/day/unit (tenant) 4082 gal/day/unit (tenant) 973 gal/day/unit (tenant) 6412 gal/day/unit (tenant) 1750 gal/day/unit (tenant) 2020 gal/day/unit (tenant) 1863 gal/day/unit (tenant) 270 gallons per EDU per day 190 gallons per EDU per day 1900 gal/day/acre 1900 gal/day/acre Institutional/Government 3000 gal/day/acre 2020 gal/day/acre 1863 gal/day/acre Source: Cucamonga Valley Water District Engineering & Water Resources Departments, Urban Water Management Plan 2000 Updated 4/11/2013 Page 9 of 10 P6O2 ATTACHMENT B Contact the school district for your area for amount and payment of school fees: Elementary School Districts Alta Loma 9350 Base Line Road, Suite F Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 987-0766 Central 10601 Church Street, Suite 112 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 989-8541 Cucamonga 8776 Archibald Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 987-8942 Etiwanda 6061 East Avenue P.O. Box 248 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 (909) 899-2451 High School Chaffey High School 211 West 5th Street Ontario, CA 91762 (909) 988-8511 Updated 4/11/2013 Page 10 of 10 LSA LEGEND FIGURE 1 0 Project Location a loon woe Daycreek Villages Project FEET SOURCE: [1SGS 7.5 Quad - Guasti (1981), CA Project Location and Vicinity I: DRH160VGIStProjcctl.ocation USGS.mxd(a1252016) u N P60 1t I 0 tare 11 �� i 11 U lr � r..•..�r.—.___ aaa��•_e� t Q t n ` � — rw3nda . +• y Fire.. Stattan °° `.: _-----u31 :___ 7=--- �� =',e •C •3 ■ a . is is Itit n n Q t1 u r 0 it °�f a p n �� ' t 6 za• — u 3svra:ca cz aaa _tl__— i1—� ( Etlwanda Sl 21 SOUTHERN J3 a .4 Project Location �•�� a _&A - CJN$ -» ; ROAD __. _, - . 13tiwanda 1 A + 1300 = a ' F k. i. ? nucCGF r'r eki r Y t jt Viii Project ' �, � T �:•:R "' '"' ivo �. % c mar .4 L..+c+, Los 11 xf Angeles Sante Bernardino :>> f Count} / Tanf'� County •� Project it (. Location aa54 gii i aRROw ���-�— A�IITE '1 �•• . v i Riverside ��� it , 1 J • t(♦�1 • County - � . •" '" �; EEr.. ..• : �. ;. r . — - ',,,Eti:PllTi� .:-sv.vrtw.:v.^• - .' AN r.•• ' LSA LEGEND FIGURE 1 0 Project Location a loon woe Daycreek Villages Project FEET SOURCE: [1SGS 7.5 Quad - Guasti (1981), CA Project Location and Vicinity I: DRH160VGIStProjcctl.ocation USGS.mxd(a1252016) DAY CREEK SQUARE SITE PLAN J. • r i � y= �• ,r 4 r n 44, H « y �•s �_.. n BASE UNE ROAD I L i ` . i FBf� [ s"*, 6 6 a s _ l�AAr ti I(MA DO L E 9302 PLTT56URGH AVE SUrrE 230 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91730 PHONE 9094816322 Bering Communities for Life FAX 909.4816320 w P607 BACKGROUND City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART 11 1. Project File: Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRC2016-00452, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19762, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20032, Conditional Use Permit DRC2016-00449, Design Review DRC2016-00450, Uniform Sign Program DRC2016-00451 and Minor Exception DRC2016-00508. 2. Related Files: Preliminary Review DRC2015-01102 and Pre -Application Review DRC2016- 00142 3. Description of Project: The applicant, DR Horton, proposes developing the 28.4 acre site located at the southwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road with a mixed use project consisting of 380 single-family and townhome residential units, a boutique hotel and two restaurant buildings totaling 12,000 square feet. The overall project area is made up of 1 parcel totaling 28.4 acres of land. Of the 28.4 acres, 24.9 will be allocated to the residential portion of the site, and 3.5 acres will be allocated to the two restaurant pads and hotel site. The project is for the site plan and architectural review of the 380 residential units (329 townhomes and 51 single-family dwelling units), two restaurant pads (two 6,000 square foot restaurants), and a 71 room hotel. The project also includes the subdivision of the 28.4 acre site into 4 parcels and a residential condominium subdivision for the 380 residential units. The project includes a Victoria Community Plan Amendment to change the zoning from Regionally Related Office/Commercial (RROC) District to Mixed Use (MU) District in order to be consistent with the Mixed Use land use designation in the General Plan. A Conditional Use Permit (CUP) application is also included for the requested bar/alcohol sales (Type 70 — On Sale General Restrictive License) at the hotel. The Assessor's Parcel Number is: 1090-331-05. 4. Project Sponsor Name and Address: DR Horton Contact: Dan Boyd, Vice President/Entitlements 2280 Wardlow Circle, Suite 100 Corona, CA 92880 Contact: Dan Boyd, 951-739-5444 5. General Plan Designation: Mixed Use 6. Zoning: Regionally Related Office Commercial (RROC) District (existing); Mixed Use (MU) District (proposed) 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The site is currently zoned Regionally Related Office/Commercial (RROC) (District) and is within the Victoria Community Plan (VCP). It is bordered by Base Line Road along the north boundary; Day Creek Boulevard along the east boundary; a single-family neighborhood zoned Mixed Use/Single Family (4-6 units/acre) within the Victoria Arbors Master Plan in the VCP along the south boundary; and a Southern California Edison transmission corridor zoned Open Space (OS) District and the Day Creek Flood Control channel zoned Flood Control (FC) District along the west boundary. Across Base Line Road at the northwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road is a neighborhood shopping center (under construction) that will be anchored by Stater Brothers, and across Day Creek Boulevard at the southeast corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road is an existing neighborhood center anchored by Sprouts Farmer's Market. P608 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00451 AND DRC2016-00508 Page 2 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Contact Person and Phone Number: Donald Granger Senior Planner (909) 477-2750, extension 4314 10. Other agencies whose approval is required: (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement) GLOSSARY — The following abbreviations are used in this report: CALEEMOD — California Emissions Estimator Model CVWD — Cucamonga Valley Water District EIR — Environmental Impact Report FEIR — Final Environmental Impact Report FPEIR - Final Program Environmental Impact Report NPDES — National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NOx — Nitrogen Oxides ROG — Reactive Organic Gases PM10 — Fine Particulate Matter RWQCB — Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD — South Coast Air Quality Management District SWPPP — Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than -Significant -Impact' as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. (✓) Aesthetics (✓) Biological Resources (✓) Greenhouse Gas Emissions () Land Use & Planning () Population & Housing (✓) Transportation/Traffic (✓) Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION (✓) Agricultural Resources (✓) Cultural Resources () Hazards & Waste Materials () Mineral Resources (✓) Public Services (✓) Tribal Cultural Resources On the basis of this initial evaluation: (✓) Air Quality (✓) Geology & Soils (✓) Hydrology & Water Quality (✓) Noise (✓) Recreation ( )Utilities & Service Systems () I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. Rev 3-1-16 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00451 AND DRC2016-00508 Page 3 (✓) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by, or agreed to, by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. () I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. () I find that the proposed project MAY have a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standard and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. () I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. Prepared By: Reviewed By: Rev 3-1-16 Date: Mike Smith Senior Planner Date: May 2, 2017 P609 P610 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00451 AND DRC2016-00508 Page 4 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project.- roject.a) Less Than a)Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? () Significant Less (✓) Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: pp g Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic Impact Incorporated Impact Impact EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project.- roject.a) a)Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? () () () (✓) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but ( ) () () (✓) not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway? C) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or ( ) () () (✓) quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, ( ) () (✓) ( ) which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Comments: a) There are no significant vistas within or immediately adjacent to the project site. Day Creek Boulevard, which runs north -south adjacent to the east edge of the project site, and Base Line Road, which runs east -west along the north edge of the project site, are Special Boulevards according to Figure LU -6 in the General Plan. Day Creek Boulevard, above Base Line/Day Creek intersection, is a designated view corridor according to General Plan Figure LU -6. The project will be developed with residential and commercial buildings that have a maximum height of 44 feet (hotel building). The setbacks for the hotel from Base Line Road will range from 13 feet to 23 feet. The south edge of the project site contains a linear park, and the southwest corner of the site is plotted with two-story, single-family dwelling units that are comparable in height to the two-story, single-family dwelling units in the neighborhood to the south. In order be compatible and provide a transition of building massing with the existing single-family neighborhood to the south, the three-story townhomes are plotted in the following areas: along Day Creek Boulevard; the westerly edge of the project which borders a utility corridor; and in the core of the project site. The commercial building heights and setbacks are comparable to similar developments in the immediate area off Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road. With the setbacks and landscaping, the development of the project site will not negatively impact the Day Creek Boulevard view corridor above the Base Line/Day Creek intersection, or construct improvements that will negatively impact the streetscape of Base Line Road and Day Creek Boulevard, both of which are designated as Special Boulevards in the General Plan. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. b) The project site contains no buildings, no scenic resources, rock outcroppings, and no historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway. There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. C) The site is located at the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Day Creek Boulevard and is characterized by comparable residential (single-family, two and three story multi- family) and commercial (food and retail uses) development to the north, south and east. The visual quality of the area will not degrade as a result of this project because the proposed mixed use project has been designed with compatible setbacks, massing and architectural concepts as the surrounding area. The tallest structure (hotel) will be 44 feet Rev 3-1-16 P611 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00451 AND DRC2016-00508 age 5 high, compatible with existing two and three-story residential development along Day Creek Boulevard between Foothill Boulevard and Base Line Road and the future commercial center at the northwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road. Along the southerly edge, a linear park is proposed and single-family dwelling units have been plotted for land use compatibility with the existing single-family neighborhood south of the project site. Additionally, the project will become will become a larger part of the community along Day Creek Boulevard and the Victoria Community Plan. As part of the entitlement process, Design Review for the site layout, architecture and landscape palette is required prior to approval. City standards require the developer to underground existing and new utility lines and facilities to minimize unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No. 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution. d) The project would increase the number of streetlights and security lighting used in the immediate vicinity. The design and placement of light fixtures is shown on site plans which require review for consistency with City standards that require shielding, diffusing, or indirect lighting to avoid glare. Lighting will be selected and located to confine the area of illumination to within the project site. A photometric study was prepared by Candela Engineering (August 31, 2016) that indicates that illumination levels within the project area meet the requirements of the Development Code and will be confined within the project area. According to the photometric study, at all of the project boundaries/edge conditions, all of the illumination generated from the project will be at 0 foot candles. The impact is considered less than significant. 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project.- roject.a) Less Than a)Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or () Significant Less ( ) Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: pp g Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Impact Incorporated Impact Impact high, compatible with existing two and three-story residential development along Day Creek Boulevard between Foothill Boulevard and Base Line Road and the future commercial center at the northwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road. Along the southerly edge, a linear park is proposed and single-family dwelling units have been plotted for land use compatibility with the existing single-family neighborhood south of the project site. Additionally, the project will become will become a larger part of the community along Day Creek Boulevard and the Victoria Community Plan. As part of the entitlement process, Design Review for the site layout, architecture and landscape palette is required prior to approval. City standards require the developer to underground existing and new utility lines and facilities to minimize unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No. 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution. d) The project would increase the number of streetlights and security lighting used in the immediate vicinity. The design and placement of light fixtures is shown on site plans which require review for consistency with City standards that require shielding, diffusing, or indirect lighting to avoid glare. Lighting will be selected and located to confine the area of illumination to within the project site. A photometric study was prepared by Candela Engineering (August 31, 2016) that indicates that illumination levels within the project area meet the requirements of the Development Code and will be confined within the project area. According to the photometric study, at all of the project boundaries/edge conditions, all of the illumination generated from the project will be at 0 foot candles. The impact is considered less than significant. 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project.- roject.a) a)Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or () () (✓) ( ) Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a () () () (✓) Williamson Act contract? C) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause re -zoning of, () () () (✓ ) forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220 (g), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code Section 51104 (g))? d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest ( ) () () (✓) land to non -forest use? e) Involve other changes in the existing environment, ( ) () () (✓) which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non -forest use? Rev 3-1-16 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00451 AND DRC2016-00508 Page 6 Comments: a) The site is not designated as Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance according to General Plan FEIR Exhibit 4.2-1. The site is located at the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Day Creek Boulevard and is characterized by comparable residential (single-family, two and three story multi -family) and commercial (food and retail uses) development to the north, south and east. There are approximately 209 acres of Farmland of Local Importance, Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga according to the General Plan and the California Department of Conservation Farmland Map 2010. Concentrations of Important Farmland are sparsely located in the southern and eastern parts of the City that is characterized by existing and planned development. Farmland in the southern portion of the City is characterized by industrial, residential, and commercial land uses and Farmland in the eastern portion of the City is within the Etiwanda area and planned for development. Further, a large number of the designated farmland parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic viability is doubtful; therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan. The General Plan FPEIR identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. There are no Williamson Act contracts within the City. C) There are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that is zoned as forest land or timberland. Therefore no impacts would occur related to the conversion of forest land to non -forest use. Further, there are no areas within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that are zoned as forest land, timberland, or Timberland Production. No mitigation is required. d) There are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that qualify as forest land or timberland. Therefore no impacts would occur related of the loss or conversion of forest land to non -forest use. Further, there are no areas within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that are zoned as forest land, timberland, or Timberland Production. e) The site is located at the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Day Creek Boulevard and is characterized by comparable residential (single-family, two and three story multi- family) and commercial (food and retail uses) development to the north, south and east. The nearest agricultural use, Joseph Filippi Winery and Vineyards, is located at 12467 Base Line Road approximately % mile to east the east of the project site. The project site does not border this agricultural use. Additionally, the mixed use project will not negatively impact the operation of this agricultural use as the mixed use project will be comprised of land uses (residential, retail, food and hospitality) that will not create adverse impacts on the operation and cultivation of the vineyard. Short term impacts to air quality to the vineyard (dust during construction) and corresponding mitigation measures are addressed in Section 3 (Air Quality). The impact is considered less than significant. There are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that qualify as forest land. Therefore, there is no potential for conversion of forest land to a non -forest use. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 3-1-16 P612 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources. pp g Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Comments: a) The site is not designated as Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance according to General Plan FEIR Exhibit 4.2-1. The site is located at the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Day Creek Boulevard and is characterized by comparable residential (single-family, two and three story multi -family) and commercial (food and retail uses) development to the north, south and east. There are approximately 209 acres of Farmland of Local Importance, Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga according to the General Plan and the California Department of Conservation Farmland Map 2010. Concentrations of Important Farmland are sparsely located in the southern and eastern parts of the City that is characterized by existing and planned development. Farmland in the southern portion of the City is characterized by industrial, residential, and commercial land uses and Farmland in the eastern portion of the City is within the Etiwanda area and planned for development. Further, a large number of the designated farmland parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic viability is doubtful; therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan. The General Plan FPEIR identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. There are no Williamson Act contracts within the City. C) There are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that is zoned as forest land or timberland. Therefore no impacts would occur related to the conversion of forest land to non -forest use. Further, there are no areas within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that are zoned as forest land, timberland, or Timberland Production. No mitigation is required. d) There are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that qualify as forest land or timberland. Therefore no impacts would occur related of the loss or conversion of forest land to non -forest use. Further, there are no areas within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that are zoned as forest land, timberland, or Timberland Production. e) The site is located at the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Day Creek Boulevard and is characterized by comparable residential (single-family, two and three story multi- family) and commercial (food and retail uses) development to the north, south and east. The nearest agricultural use, Joseph Filippi Winery and Vineyards, is located at 12467 Base Line Road approximately % mile to east the east of the project site. The project site does not border this agricultural use. Additionally, the mixed use project will not negatively impact the operation of this agricultural use as the mixed use project will be comprised of land uses (residential, retail, food and hospitality) that will not create adverse impacts on the operation and cultivation of the vineyard. Short term impacts to air quality to the vineyard (dust during construction) and corresponding mitigation measures are addressed in Section 3 (Air Quality). The impact is considered less than significant. There are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that qualify as forest land. Therefore, there is no potential for conversion of forest land to a non -forest use. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 3-1-16 P612 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00451 AND DRC2016-00508 Page 7 3. AIR QUALITY. Would the project.- roject.a) Less Than a)Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the () Significant Less (✓) and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation ThanIssues Significant No b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 3. AIR QUALITY. Would the project.- roject.a) a)Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the () () () (✓) applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute () (✓) () ( ) substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? C) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of () (✓) () ( ) any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant () (✓) () ( ) concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial () () () (✓) number of people? Comments: a) As discussed in subsection b, with mitigation measures, the project would not exceed any air quality standards and would not interfere with the region's ability to comply with Federal and State air quality standards for Criterion 1 (Increase in the Frequency or Severity of Violations/local air quality impacts) or Criterion 2 (Exceed Assumptions in the AQMP [consistency with the 2003 AQMP]). Therefore, the project is consistent with the 2003 AQMP. b) Both the State of California and the Federal government have established health -based ambient air quality standards (AAQS) for seven air pollutants. These pollutants include ozone (03), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), coarse particulate matter with a diameter or 10 microns or less (PMio), fine particulate matter less than 2.5 (PM2.5) microns in diameter and lead. Among these pollutants, ozone and particulate matter (PMio and PM2.e) are considered regional pollutants while the others have more localized effects. In addition, the State of California has set standards for sulfates, hydrogen sulfide (1-12S), vinyl chloride and visibility reducing particles. These standards are designed to protect the health and welfare of the populace with a reasonable margin of safety. The City of Rancho Cucamonga area is within the South Coast Air Basin, which is under the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). The California Clean Air Act (CCAA) provides the SCAQMD with the authority to manage transportation activities at indirect sources. Indirect sources of pollution are generated when minor sources collectively emit a substantial amount of pollution. Examples of this include motor vehicles at an intersection, a mall and on highways. SCAQMD also regulates stationary sources of pollution within a jurisdictional area. Direct emissions from motor vehicles are regulated by the Air Resources Board (ARB). Rev 3-1-16 P613 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00451 AND DRC2016-00508 Page 8 The combination of topography, low mixing height, abundant sunshine, and emissions from the second largest urban area in the United States gives the Basin the worst air pollution problem in the nation. The Basin experiences a persistent temperature inversion (increasing temperature with increasing altitude); this inversion (coupled with low wind speeds) limits the vertical dispersion of air contaminants, holding them relatively near the ground. Pursuant to the Federal Clean Air Act (FCAA) of 1970, the EPA established national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for six major pollutants, termed criteria pollutants: ozone (Os), coarse particulate matter with a diameter or 10 microns or less (PMlo), fine particulate matter less than 2.5 (PM2.5) microns in diameter, carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), and lead. Criteria pollutants are defined as those pollutants for which the Federal and State governments have established AAQS, or criteria, for outdoor concentrations in order to protect public health. Data collected at permanent monitoring stations are used by the EPA to classify regions as "attainment" or "non -attainment" depending on whether the regions met the requirements stated in the primary NAAQS. Nonattainment areas have additional restrictions as required by the EPA. The EPA has designated the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) as the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) responsible for ensuring the Basin's compliance with the FCAA. The South Coast Air Basin is in nonattainment Status for Ozone (8 -hour) and PM,o under National Ambient Air Quality Standards, and in nonattainment status for Ozone (1 -hour and 8 -hour) PM10 and PM2.5 under California Ambient Air Quality Standards. Specific criteria for determining whether the potential air quality impacts of a project are significant are set forth in the SCAQMD's CEQA Air Quality Handbook. The criteria include daily emissions thresholds, compliance with State and national air quality standards, and consistency with the current AQMP. As prescribed by SCAQMD, an Air Quality Impact Analysis was prepared by LSA Associates (July 19, 2016) that utilizes CalEEMod (Version 2013.2.2 to evaluate short-term construction emissions and short- term construction emissions for localized significant thresholds, long-term operational emissions, operation emissions for localized significant thresholds, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions (GHG) (see Section 7 for GHG analysis). Short Term (Construction): Project Emissions and Impacts The project is for the site plan and architectural review of a mixed use project consisting of mixed use project consisting of 380 residential units, a 71 room hotel and two restaurant pads (6,000 square feet each) totaling 12,000 square feet. The project also includes a Victoria Community Plan Amendment to change the zoning from Regionally Related Office/Commercial (RROC) District to Mixed Use (MU) District in order to be consistent with the General Plan. The project site is currently a vacant 28 acre parcel. The potential emissions associated with construction of the project are described in the following sections. Summary of Peak Construction Emissions: SCAQMD Regional Thresholds (with Best Available Control Measures): Rev 3-1-16 P614 Less Than Significant Less and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant with Mitigation ThanIssues Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact The combination of topography, low mixing height, abundant sunshine, and emissions from the second largest urban area in the United States gives the Basin the worst air pollution problem in the nation. The Basin experiences a persistent temperature inversion (increasing temperature with increasing altitude); this inversion (coupled with low wind speeds) limits the vertical dispersion of air contaminants, holding them relatively near the ground. Pursuant to the Federal Clean Air Act (FCAA) of 1970, the EPA established national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for six major pollutants, termed criteria pollutants: ozone (Os), coarse particulate matter with a diameter or 10 microns or less (PMlo), fine particulate matter less than 2.5 (PM2.5) microns in diameter, carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), and lead. Criteria pollutants are defined as those pollutants for which the Federal and State governments have established AAQS, or criteria, for outdoor concentrations in order to protect public health. Data collected at permanent monitoring stations are used by the EPA to classify regions as "attainment" or "non -attainment" depending on whether the regions met the requirements stated in the primary NAAQS. Nonattainment areas have additional restrictions as required by the EPA. The EPA has designated the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) as the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) responsible for ensuring the Basin's compliance with the FCAA. The South Coast Air Basin is in nonattainment Status for Ozone (8 -hour) and PM,o under National Ambient Air Quality Standards, and in nonattainment status for Ozone (1 -hour and 8 -hour) PM10 and PM2.5 under California Ambient Air Quality Standards. Specific criteria for determining whether the potential air quality impacts of a project are significant are set forth in the SCAQMD's CEQA Air Quality Handbook. The criteria include daily emissions thresholds, compliance with State and national air quality standards, and consistency with the current AQMP. As prescribed by SCAQMD, an Air Quality Impact Analysis was prepared by LSA Associates (July 19, 2016) that utilizes CalEEMod (Version 2013.2.2 to evaluate short-term construction emissions and short- term construction emissions for localized significant thresholds, long-term operational emissions, operation emissions for localized significant thresholds, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions (GHG) (see Section 7 for GHG analysis). Short Term (Construction): Project Emissions and Impacts The project is for the site plan and architectural review of a mixed use project consisting of mixed use project consisting of 380 residential units, a 71 room hotel and two restaurant pads (6,000 square feet each) totaling 12,000 square feet. The project also includes a Victoria Community Plan Amendment to change the zoning from Regionally Related Office/Commercial (RROC) District to Mixed Use (MU) District in order to be consistent with the General Plan. The project site is currently a vacant 28 acre parcel. The potential emissions associated with construction of the project are described in the following sections. Summary of Peak Construction Emissions: SCAQMD Regional Thresholds (with Best Available Control Measures): Rev 3-1-16 P614 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00451 AND DRC2016-00508 Page 9 As shown in the following tables, project implementation will not exceed significance thresholds for SCAQMD Regional Thresholds or SCAQMD Localized Thresholds. Table 3-5: Emissions Summary of Construction (with mitigation) Year Emissions (pounds per day) Less Than NOx CO Sox PM10 Significant Less 4.08 and Supporting Information Sources: PotentiallyWith Significant Mitigation ThanIssues Significant No 2018 Impact Incorporated Impact Impact As shown in the following tables, project implementation will not exceed significance thresholds for SCAQMD Regional Thresholds or SCAQMD Localized Thresholds. Table 3-5: Emissions Summary of Construction (with mitigation) Year Emissions (pounds per day) VOC NOx CO Sox PM10 PM2.5 2017 4.08 70.03 79.97 0.15 16.94 9.64 2018 4.49 69.18 79.62 0.15 16.85 9.56 2019 4.02 28.81 41.22 0.09 5.64 2.5 2020 37.28 28.52 45.01 0.10 6.34 2.67 Maximum Daily Emissions 37.28 70.03 79.97 0.15 16.94 9.64 SCAQMD Regional Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55 Threshold Exceeded? NO NO NO NO NO NO Construction activities associated with the project will result in emissions of CO, VOCs, NOx, SOx, PM,o and PM2.5 and are expected from the following construction activities: grading, building construction, paving, architectural coating and construction workers commuting. Construction is anticipated to commence in the Winter of 2018 and finish in the Winter of 2021. Summary of Peak Construction Emissions: SCAQMD Localized Siqnificance Summary Table 3-9: Localized Significance Summary Grading Grading 1 -Hour CO 8 -Hour I NOz I Averaging Time 1 -Hour PM10 PM2.5 24 -Hours Peak Day Localized Emissions 0.40 0.29 0.01 7.92 4.57 Background Concentration" 2.5 1.6 0.087 Total Concentration 2.90 1.89 0.10 7.92 4.57 SCAQMD Localized Significance Threshold 20 9 0.18 10.4 10.4 Threshold Exceeded? NO NO NO NO NO A Highest concentration from the last three years of available data Note: PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations are expressed in µg/m3. All others are expressed in ppm Equipment Exhausts and Related Construction Activities Construction activities produce combustion emissions from various sources such as site grading, utility engines, on-site heavy-duty construction vehicles, asphalt paving, and motor vehicles transporting the construction crew. Exhaust emissions from construction activities envisioned on site would vary daily as construction activity levels change. The Rev 3-1-16 P615 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00451 AND DRC2016-00508 Page 10 use of construction equipment on site would result in localized exhaust emissions; however, as shown in Table 3-9, the amount will not exceed any threshold of significance. Fugitive Dust Fugitive dust emissions are generally emissions associated with land clearing and exposure of soils to the air and wind, and cut -and -fill grading operations. Dust generated during construction varies substantially on a project -by project basis, depending on the level of activity, the specific operation and weather conditions at the time of construction. Construction emissions can vary greatly depending on the level of activity, the specific operations taking place, the equipment being operated, local soils, weather conditions and other factors. The proposed project will be required to comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 to control fugitive dust. Architectural Coatings Architectural coatings contain VOCs that are similar to ROCs and are part of the 03 precursors. Based on the proposed project, it is estimated that the proposed project will result in a maximum of approximately 38.83 lbs of VOC per day (with mitigation) combined for all construction sources during construction. Therefore, this VOC emission is the principal air emission and is less than the SCAQMD VOC threshold of 75 lbs/day. Odors Heavy-duty equipment in the project area during construction would emit odors. These odors are temporary, short-term and intermittent, and also would not result in persistent impacts that would affect substantial numbers of people (LSA Associates; July 19, 2016). Further, the construction activity would cease to occur after individual construction is completed. No other sources of objectionable odors have been identified for the proposed project, and no mitigation measures are required for odors. In compliance with SCAQMD Rule 402 the proposed uses are not anticipated to emit any objectionable odors. Therefore, objectionable odors posing a health risk to potential on-site and existing off-site uses would not occur as a result of the proposed project. Naturally Occurrinq Asbestos The proposed project is located in San Bernardino County and it is not among the counties that are found to have serpentine and ultramafic rock in their soils. In addition, there has been no serpentine or ultramafic rock found in the project area. Therefore, the potential risk for naturally occurring asbestos (NOA) during project construction is small and less than significant. Based on the discussion above and with implementation of the following Best Available Control Measures (BACM) identified in the Air Quality Analysis by Urban Crossroads (July 19, 2016) and mitigation measures, short-term, construction impacts will be less - than -significant: 1) During grading activity, all construction equipment (>_ 150 horsepower) shall be California Air Resources Board (CARE) Tier 3 Certified or better. Rev 3-1-16 P616 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: pp g Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incor rated Impact Impact use of construction equipment on site would result in localized exhaust emissions; however, as shown in Table 3-9, the amount will not exceed any threshold of significance. Fugitive Dust Fugitive dust emissions are generally emissions associated with land clearing and exposure of soils to the air and wind, and cut -and -fill grading operations. Dust generated during construction varies substantially on a project -by project basis, depending on the level of activity, the specific operation and weather conditions at the time of construction. Construction emissions can vary greatly depending on the level of activity, the specific operations taking place, the equipment being operated, local soils, weather conditions and other factors. The proposed project will be required to comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 to control fugitive dust. Architectural Coatings Architectural coatings contain VOCs that are similar to ROCs and are part of the 03 precursors. Based on the proposed project, it is estimated that the proposed project will result in a maximum of approximately 38.83 lbs of VOC per day (with mitigation) combined for all construction sources during construction. Therefore, this VOC emission is the principal air emission and is less than the SCAQMD VOC threshold of 75 lbs/day. Odors Heavy-duty equipment in the project area during construction would emit odors. These odors are temporary, short-term and intermittent, and also would not result in persistent impacts that would affect substantial numbers of people (LSA Associates; July 19, 2016). Further, the construction activity would cease to occur after individual construction is completed. No other sources of objectionable odors have been identified for the proposed project, and no mitigation measures are required for odors. In compliance with SCAQMD Rule 402 the proposed uses are not anticipated to emit any objectionable odors. Therefore, objectionable odors posing a health risk to potential on-site and existing off-site uses would not occur as a result of the proposed project. Naturally Occurrinq Asbestos The proposed project is located in San Bernardino County and it is not among the counties that are found to have serpentine and ultramafic rock in their soils. In addition, there has been no serpentine or ultramafic rock found in the project area. Therefore, the potential risk for naturally occurring asbestos (NOA) during project construction is small and less than significant. Based on the discussion above and with implementation of the following Best Available Control Measures (BACM) identified in the Air Quality Analysis by Urban Crossroads (July 19, 2016) and mitigation measures, short-term, construction impacts will be less - than -significant: 1) During grading activity, all construction equipment (>_ 150 horsepower) shall be California Air Resources Board (CARE) Tier 3 Certified or better. Rev 3-1-16 P616 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00451 AND DRC2016-00508 Pae 11 2) All clearing, grading, earth -moving, or excavation activities shall cease when winds exceed 25mph per SCAQMD guidelines in order to limit fugitive dust emissions. 3) The contractor shall ensure that all disturbed unpaved roads and disturbed areas within the project are watered at least three (3) times daily during dry weather. Watering, with complete coverage of disturbed areas, shall occur at least three times a day, preferably in the midmorning, afternoon, and after work is done for the day. 4) The contractor shall ensure that traffic speeds on unpaved roads and Project site areas are reduced to 15 miles per hour or less. Cumulative Impacts: Short -Term Construction Emissions Continued development will contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions. In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction activities. While most of the dust would settle on or near the project site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area. Construction is an on-going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area. Construction workers and equipment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete. Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment emissions are required to be assessed. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of Air Quality based on the future build out of the City. Based upon on the Urban Emissions Model (URBEMIS7G) estimates in Table 4.3-3 of the General Plan (FPEIR), Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2), Ozone (Os), and Particulate Matter (PM2.5 and PM,o) would exceed SCAQMD thresholds for significance; therefore, they would all be cumulatively considerable if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less -than -significant. This city-wide increase in emissions was identified as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council as noted in the Section 4.3 of the General Plan FPEIR. With implementation of the following best practices and mitigation measures from the City's 2010 General Plan FPEIR that are designed to minimize short-term air quality impacts, the project's contribution to cumulative impacts will be less -than -significant: 5) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 6) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also Rev 3-1-16 P617 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: pp g Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 2) All clearing, grading, earth -moving, or excavation activities shall cease when winds exceed 25mph per SCAQMD guidelines in order to limit fugitive dust emissions. 3) The contractor shall ensure that all disturbed unpaved roads and disturbed areas within the project are watered at least three (3) times daily during dry weather. Watering, with complete coverage of disturbed areas, shall occur at least three times a day, preferably in the midmorning, afternoon, and after work is done for the day. 4) The contractor shall ensure that traffic speeds on unpaved roads and Project site areas are reduced to 15 miles per hour or less. Cumulative Impacts: Short -Term Construction Emissions Continued development will contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions. In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction activities. While most of the dust would settle on or near the project site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area. Construction is an on-going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area. Construction workers and equipment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete. Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment emissions are required to be assessed. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of Air Quality based on the future build out of the City. Based upon on the Urban Emissions Model (URBEMIS7G) estimates in Table 4.3-3 of the General Plan (FPEIR), Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2), Ozone (Os), and Particulate Matter (PM2.5 and PM,o) would exceed SCAQMD thresholds for significance; therefore, they would all be cumulatively considerable if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less -than -significant. This city-wide increase in emissions was identified as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council as noted in the Section 4.3 of the General Plan FPEIR. With implementation of the following best practices and mitigation measures from the City's 2010 General Plan FPEIR that are designed to minimize short-term air quality impacts, the project's contribution to cumulative impacts will be less -than -significant: 5) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 6) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also Rev 3-1-16 P617 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00451 AND DRC2016-00508 Paae 12 conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. 7) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 8) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction -grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 9) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 10) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 11) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24 -inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 12) The site shall be treated with water or other soil -stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB)) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. Rev 3-1-16 P618 Than ificant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PP g Potentiallyith Significant gation LIncorporated Than Significant No Impact Impact Impact conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. 7) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 8) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction -grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 9) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 10) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 11) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24 -inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 12) The site shall be treated with water or other soil -stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB)) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. Rev 3-1-16 P618 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00451 AND DRC2016-00508 Page 13 13) Chemical soil -stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. Project Long Term (Operational) Emissions and Impacts Long-term air pollutant emissions are those associated with stationary sources and mobile sources involving any project -related changes. The proposed project would result in a net increase in the amount of development in the area; therefore, the proposed project would result in net increases in both stationary and mobile source emissions. The stationary source emissions would come from additional natural gas consumption for on-site buildings and electricity for the lighting in the buildings and at the parking area. As shown in the following tables, project implementation will not exceed any significance thresholds. No long-term, operational impacts will occur as a result of the project. Summary of Peak Operational Emissions (SCAQMD Regional Thresholds): Table 3-6: Summary of Peak Operational Emissions (1 of 2) Operational Activities -Summer Scenario Emissions (pounds per day) Than NOx CO sox PMio ificant Less 20.69 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: pp g PotentiallyWith Significant ation L'n-'ii Than Significant N Energy Source Impact ated Impact I" a t 13) Chemical soil -stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. Project Long Term (Operational) Emissions and Impacts Long-term air pollutant emissions are those associated with stationary sources and mobile sources involving any project -related changes. The proposed project would result in a net increase in the amount of development in the area; therefore, the proposed project would result in net increases in both stationary and mobile source emissions. The stationary source emissions would come from additional natural gas consumption for on-site buildings and electricity for the lighting in the buildings and at the parking area. As shown in the following tables, project implementation will not exceed any significance thresholds. No long-term, operational impacts will occur as a result of the project. Summary of Peak Operational Emissions (SCAQMD Regional Thresholds): Table 3-6: Summary of Peak Operational Emissions (1 of 2) Operational Activities -Summer Scenario Emissions (pounds per day) VOC NOx CO sox PMio PM2.5 Area Source 20.69 0.36 31.52 1.6E-3 0.68 0.68 Energy Source 0.50 4.39 2.83 0.03 0.34 0.34 Mobile 12.11 30.83 124.91 0.35 23.26 6.53 Total Maximum Daily Emissions 33.30 35.58 159.26 0.38 24.28 7.55 SCAQMD Regional Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55 Threshold Exceeded? NO NO NO NO NO NO Table 3-6: Summary of Peak Operational Emissions (2 of 2) Operational Activities -Winter Scenario Emissions (pounds per day) VOC NOx CO sox PMio PMz.s Area Source 20.69 0.36 31.52 1.6E-3 0.68 0.68 Energy Source 0.50 4.39 2.83 0.03 0.34 0.34 Mobile 11.73 32.11 119.43 0.33 23.26 6.53 Total Maximum Daily Emissions 32.92 36.86 153.78 0.36 24.29 7.55 SCAQM D Regional Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55 Threshold Exceeded? NO NO NO NO NO NO Summary of Peak Operational Emissions (SCAQMD Localized Significance Summary) Rev 3-1-16 P619 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00451 AND DRC2016-00508 Page 14 The proposed involves the construction and operation of the following: 51 single-family detached dwelling units, 329 condo/townhome units, 71 room hotel, and a 12,000 square foot sit down restaurant. According to SCAQMD LST methodology, LSTs would apply to the operational phase of a proposed project if the project includes stationary sources, or attracts mobile sources that may spend long periods queuing and idling at the site (e.g., transfer facilities and warehouse buildings). The proposed project does not include such uses, and therefore, due to the lack of significant stationary source emissions, no long- term localized significance threshold analysis is needed. Cumulative Impacts (Lona Term/Operational Emissions) CO Hotspot Analysis The Project would not result in potentially adverse CO concentrations or "hot spots." Further, detailed modeling of Project -specific carbon monoxide (CO) "hot spots" is not needed to reach this conclusion. An adverse CO concentration, known as a "hot spot", would occur if an exceedance of the state one-hour standard of 20 ppm or the eight-hour standard of 9 ppm were to occur. At the time of the 1993 Handbook, the SCAB was designated nonattainment under the California AAQS and National AAQS for CO. It has long been recognized that CO hotspots are caused by vehicular emissions, primarily when idling at congested intersections. In response, vehicle emissions standards have become increasingly stringent in the last twenty years. Currently, the allowable CO emissions standard in California is a maximum of 3.4 grams/mile for passenger cars (there are requirements for certain vehicles that are more stringent). With the turnover of older vehicles, introduction of cleaner fuels, and implementation of increasingly sophisticated and efficient emissions control technologies, CO concentration in the SCAB is now designated as attainment. Also, CO concentrations in the project vicinity have steadily declined, as indicated by historical emissions data. To establish a more accurate record of baseline CO concentrations affecting the SCAB, a CO "hot spot" analysis was conducted in 2003 for four busy intersections in Los Angeles at the peak morning and afternoon time periods. This "hot spot" analysis did not predict any violation of CO standards, as shown on Table 3-10. Based on the SCAQMD's 2003 AQMP and the 1992 Federal Attainment Plan for Carbon Monoxide (1992 CO Plan), peak carbon monoxide concentrations in the SCAB were a result of unusual meteorological and topographical conditions and not a result of traffic volumes and congestion at a particular intersection. As evidence of this, for example, 9.3 ppm 8 -hr CO concentration measured at the Long Beach Blvd. and Imperial Hwy. intersection (highest CO generating intersection within the "hot spot" analysis), only 0.7 ppm was attributable to the traffic volumes and congestion at this intersection; the remaining 8.6 ppm were due to the ambient air measurements at the time the 2003 AQMP was prepared. In contrast, the ambient 8 -hr CO concentration within the project study area is estimated at 1.4 ppm -1.6 ppm. Therefore, even if the traffic volumes for the proposed project were double or even triple of the traffic volumes generated at the Long Beach Blvd. and Imperial Hwy. intersection, coupled with the on-going improvements in ambient Rev 3-1-16 P620 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: pp g Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact The proposed involves the construction and operation of the following: 51 single-family detached dwelling units, 329 condo/townhome units, 71 room hotel, and a 12,000 square foot sit down restaurant. According to SCAQMD LST methodology, LSTs would apply to the operational phase of a proposed project if the project includes stationary sources, or attracts mobile sources that may spend long periods queuing and idling at the site (e.g., transfer facilities and warehouse buildings). The proposed project does not include such uses, and therefore, due to the lack of significant stationary source emissions, no long- term localized significance threshold analysis is needed. Cumulative Impacts (Lona Term/Operational Emissions) CO Hotspot Analysis The Project would not result in potentially adverse CO concentrations or "hot spots." Further, detailed modeling of Project -specific carbon monoxide (CO) "hot spots" is not needed to reach this conclusion. An adverse CO concentration, known as a "hot spot", would occur if an exceedance of the state one-hour standard of 20 ppm or the eight-hour standard of 9 ppm were to occur. At the time of the 1993 Handbook, the SCAB was designated nonattainment under the California AAQS and National AAQS for CO. It has long been recognized that CO hotspots are caused by vehicular emissions, primarily when idling at congested intersections. In response, vehicle emissions standards have become increasingly stringent in the last twenty years. Currently, the allowable CO emissions standard in California is a maximum of 3.4 grams/mile for passenger cars (there are requirements for certain vehicles that are more stringent). With the turnover of older vehicles, introduction of cleaner fuels, and implementation of increasingly sophisticated and efficient emissions control technologies, CO concentration in the SCAB is now designated as attainment. Also, CO concentrations in the project vicinity have steadily declined, as indicated by historical emissions data. To establish a more accurate record of baseline CO concentrations affecting the SCAB, a CO "hot spot" analysis was conducted in 2003 for four busy intersections in Los Angeles at the peak morning and afternoon time periods. This "hot spot" analysis did not predict any violation of CO standards, as shown on Table 3-10. Based on the SCAQMD's 2003 AQMP and the 1992 Federal Attainment Plan for Carbon Monoxide (1992 CO Plan), peak carbon monoxide concentrations in the SCAB were a result of unusual meteorological and topographical conditions and not a result of traffic volumes and congestion at a particular intersection. As evidence of this, for example, 9.3 ppm 8 -hr CO concentration measured at the Long Beach Blvd. and Imperial Hwy. intersection (highest CO generating intersection within the "hot spot" analysis), only 0.7 ppm was attributable to the traffic volumes and congestion at this intersection; the remaining 8.6 ppm were due to the ambient air measurements at the time the 2003 AQMP was prepared. In contrast, the ambient 8 -hr CO concentration within the project study area is estimated at 1.4 ppm -1.6 ppm. Therefore, even if the traffic volumes for the proposed project were double or even triple of the traffic volumes generated at the Long Beach Blvd. and Imperial Hwy. intersection, coupled with the on-going improvements in ambient Rev 3-1-16 P620 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00451 AND DRC2016-00508 Page 15 air quality, the project would not be capable of resulting in a CO "hot spot" at any study area intersections. Similar considerations are also employed by other Air Districts when evaluating potential CO concentration impacts. More specifically, the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) concludes that under existing and future vehicle emission rates, a given project would have to increase traffic volumes at a single intersection by more than 44,000 vehicles per hour—or 24,000 vehicles per hour where vertical and/or horizontal air does not mix—in order to generate a significant CO impact. TABLE 3-10: CO MODEL RESULTS Intersection Location Carbon Monoxide Concentrations (ppm) Less Than Afternoon 1 -hour 8 -hour Wilshire -Veteran 4.6 Significant Less Sunset -Highland Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PP g Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No 3.1 Impact Incorporated Impact Im act air quality, the project would not be capable of resulting in a CO "hot spot" at any study area intersections. Similar considerations are also employed by other Air Districts when evaluating potential CO concentration impacts. More specifically, the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) concludes that under existing and future vehicle emission rates, a given project would have to increase traffic volumes at a single intersection by more than 44,000 vehicles per hour—or 24,000 vehicles per hour where vertical and/or horizontal air does not mix—in order to generate a significant CO impact. TABLE 3-10: CO MODEL RESULTS Intersection Location Carbon Monoxide Concentrations (ppm) Morning 1 -hour Afternoon 1 -hour 8 -hour Wilshire -Veteran 4.6 3.5 4.2 Sunset -Highland 4 4.5 3.9 La Cienega-Century 3.7 3.1 5.8 Long Beach -Imperial 3 3.1 9.3 Source: 2003 AQMP Notes: ppm: parts per million. Federal 1 -hour standard is 35 ppm and the deferral 8 -hour standard is 9.0 ppm. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the potential impacts to air quality based on the future build out of the City. In the long-term, continued development would result in significant operational vehicle emissions based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 4.3-3 of the General Plan FPEIR; therefore, all developments would be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a less -than -significant level. This City-wide increase in emissions was identified as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council as noted in the Section 4.3 of the General Plan FPEIR. With implementation of the following mitigation measures from the City's 2010 General Plan FPEIR that are designed to minimize long-term, operational air quality impacts, the project's contribution to cumulative impacts will be less -than -significant: 14) Provide adequate ingress and egress at all entrances to public facilities to minimize vehicle idling at curbsides. 15) Provide preferential parking to high occupancy vehicles and shuttle services. 16) Schedule truck deliveries and pickups during off-peak hours. 17) Improve thermal integrity of the buildings and reduce thermal load with automated time clocks or occupant sensors. 18) Landscape with native and/or drought -resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. Rev 3-1-16 P621 P622 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00451 AND DRC2016-00508 Page 16 19) Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planting programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC -01 measure. 20) Comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources PRC -03, and Stationary Sources Operations Enhanced Inspection and Maintenance and ADV-MISC to reduce emissions of restaurant operations. 21) All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i.e., in excess of 10 minutes). 22) All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools. 23) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas. 24) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible. 25) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 26) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. C) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 4.3), continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. The General Plan FPEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. Based on the Air Quality Impact Analysis by LSA Associates (July 19, 2016), no short- term construction or long-term operational impacts to air quality would occur as a result of the project. Because the project would result in minimal emissions that do not exceed any thresholds of significance, the project's contribution to cumulative impacts is also considered minimal. With implementation of mitigation measures listed in subsection b) above from the City's 2010 General Plan FPEIR, which are designed to minimize long-term, operational air quality impacts, cumulative impacts will be less -than -significant. d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large. The SCAQMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors: long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities. According to the SCAQMD, projects have the potential to create significant Rev 3-1-16 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: Pp g Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant N Impact Incorporated Impact 1 a t 19) Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planting programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC -01 measure. 20) Comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources PRC -03, and Stationary Sources Operations Enhanced Inspection and Maintenance and ADV-MISC to reduce emissions of restaurant operations. 21) All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i.e., in excess of 10 minutes). 22) All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools. 23) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas. 24) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible. 25) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 26) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. C) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 4.3), continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. The General Plan FPEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. Based on the Air Quality Impact Analysis by LSA Associates (July 19, 2016), no short- term construction or long-term operational impacts to air quality would occur as a result of the project. Because the project would result in minimal emissions that do not exceed any thresholds of significance, the project's contribution to cumulative impacts is also considered minimal. With implementation of mitigation measures listed in subsection b) above from the City's 2010 General Plan FPEIR, which are designed to minimize long-term, operational air quality impacts, cumulative impacts will be less -than -significant. d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large. The SCAQMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors: long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities. According to the SCAQMD, projects have the potential to create significant Rev 3-1-16 P623 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00451 AND DRC2016-00508 Page 17 impacts if they are located within % mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401. The project site is located within % mile of the following sensitive receptors: residential dwelling units. During construction, there is the possibility of fugitive dust to be generated from grading the site. The mitigation measures listed under subsection b) above and the following mitigation measure will reduce any potential impact to less -than -significant levels. 27) All new development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District's Rule 445, Wood Burning Devices. Rule 445 was adopted in March 2008 to reduce emissions of PM2.6 and precludes the installation of indoor or outdoor wood burning devices (i.e. fireplaces/hearths) in new development on or after March 9, 2009. e) Construction odors (short-term) may include odors associated with equipment use including diesel exhaust or roofing, painting and paving. These odors are temporary, intermittent and short-term, and would not result in persistent impacts. Operational odors (long-term) are not typically associated with residential and hotel uses. Odors from the proposed food uses use would most likely be from activities such as cooking and grills; however, these odors would be minimal, and would typically dissipate and disperse quickly and not considered to be significant. Project generated refuse would be stored in covered containers and removed at regular intervals. Additionally, the food uses are physically separated from the residential uses, and the project does not feature vertically integrated land uses within the same building. No adverse impacts are anticipated. 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project.- roject.a) Less Than a)Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or () Significant Less ( ) Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status Impact Incorporated Impact Impact impacts if they are located within % mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401. The project site is located within % mile of the following sensitive receptors: residential dwelling units. During construction, there is the possibility of fugitive dust to be generated from grading the site. The mitigation measures listed under subsection b) above and the following mitigation measure will reduce any potential impact to less -than -significant levels. 27) All new development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District's Rule 445, Wood Burning Devices. Rule 445 was adopted in March 2008 to reduce emissions of PM2.6 and precludes the installation of indoor or outdoor wood burning devices (i.e. fireplaces/hearths) in new development on or after March 9, 2009. e) Construction odors (short-term) may include odors associated with equipment use including diesel exhaust or roofing, painting and paving. These odors are temporary, intermittent and short-term, and would not result in persistent impacts. Operational odors (long-term) are not typically associated with residential and hotel uses. Odors from the proposed food uses use would most likely be from activities such as cooking and grills; however, these odors would be minimal, and would typically dissipate and disperse quickly and not considered to be significant. Project generated refuse would be stored in covered containers and removed at regular intervals. Additionally, the food uses are physically separated from the residential uses, and the project does not feature vertically integrated land uses within the same building. No adverse impacts are anticipated. 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project.- roject.a) a)Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or () (✓) () ( ) through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat () () (✓) ( ) or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? C) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally () () () (✓) protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? Rev 3-1-16 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00451 AND DRC2016-00508 Page 18 d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native () Less Than (✓) ( ) resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources. pp g Potentially Significant with Mitigation Than Significant No corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery Impact Incorporated Impact Impact d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native () () (✓) ( ) resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances () () () (✓) protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat () () () (✓) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan? Comments: a) The project site is located in an area developed with commercial and residential uses. The site has been previously disrupted during periodic discing for weed abatement. According to Section 4.4 of the General Plan FPEIR, the project site is within an area of sensitive biological resources. According to the General Plan FPEIR, the site may contain mixed sage scrub (Riversidean Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub (RAFSS)). A Biological Technical Report was completed for the project site by Glenn Lukos Associates (GLA; April 21, 2017). The report includes a field study that study focused on a number of primary objectives that would comply with CEQA requirements, including (1) general biological surveys and vegetation mapping; (2) habitat assessments for special -status plant and wildlife species; (3) focused plant surveys; and (4) focused wildlife surveys. Existing Site Conditions The Project site is generally flat, ranging from approximately 1,275 feet to 1,315 feet above mean sea level (AMSL). The site is located on an old alluvial fan that at one time was connected to the broader alluvial fan to the north. Over time, various development projects, including flood control improvements to the Day Creek Channel located just west of the project site have modified the site and the surrounding landscape. The majority of the Project site is vegetated with California buckwheat (Eriogonum fasciculatum). Additional shrub species include coastal sagebrush (Artemisia californica), deerweed (Acmispon glaber), chamise (Adenostoma fasciculatum), goldenbush (Ericameria ssp.), scalebroom (Lepidospartum squamatum), and groundsel (Senecio flaccidus var. douglasii). The northwestern portion of the property has been cleared of vegetation, and supports scattered re-establishing individuals of California buckwheat, as well as non- native, ruderal vegetation and non-native grasses. Other parts of the property contain stockpiled concrete and other debris. Rev 3-1-16 P624 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00451 AND DRC2016-00508 Page 19 Summary of Surveys Table 2-1 Summary of Biological Surveys for the Project Site Survey Type Survey Dates Less Than Biological/Regulatory 9/24/15 MR, LL Overview Significant Less Gnatcatcher Focused Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: pP g Potentially Significant with Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Summary of Surveys Table 2-1 Summary of Biological Surveys for the Project Site Survey Type Survey Dates Biologists Biological/Regulatory 9/24/15 MR, LL Overview Gnatcatcher Focused 11/6/15 KL Surveys 11/20/15 JA 12/4/15 JA 12/21/15 DM 1/4/16 JA 1/18/16 JA 2/2/16 DM 2/16/16 DM 3/1/16 JA Small Mammal Trapping 11/12/15 to ENVIRA 11/17/15 Delhi Sands Flower -loving 12/15/15 Ecological Sciences, Inc. Fly Habitat Evaluation Burrowing Owl Focused 3/16/16 Sc Surveys 4/19/16 Sc 6/6/16 SC 7/13/16 DM Rare Plant Surveys 4/1/16 DM 5/24/16 DM Vegetation Mapping 12/4/16 Sc 4/1/16 DM Focused Surveys for Special Status Animal Species Based on the presence of potentially suitable habitat, focused surveys were performed for the coastal California gnatcatcher (Polioptila californica californica) and a Habitat Suitability Evaluation was conducted for the Delhi Sands Flower Loving Fly (Rhaphiomidas terminatus abdominalis --herein DSFF). In addition, a trapping study was performed to determine the presence/absence of special -status small mammals, including the San Bernardino kangaroo rat (Dipodomys merriami parvus). Results of Surveys and Assessments for Plants and Animals Rev 3-1-16 P625 P626 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00451 AND DRC2016-00508 Page 20 Special Plant Status No special -status plants were detected at the Project site during focused surveys, and the project will not impact any special status plants (GLA, April 21, 2017; page 19). Table 4-1 Special Status Plants Evaluated for the Project Site Species Name Status Less Than Occurrence Brand's star phacelia Federal: None Coastal dunes and coastal sage Significant Less State: None and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation ThanIssues Significant No focused surveys. Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Special Plant Status No special -status plants were detected at the Project site during focused surveys, and the project will not impact any special status plants (GLA, April 21, 2017; page 19). Table 4-1 Special Status Plants Evaluated for the Project Site Species Name Status Habitat Requirements Occurrence Brand's star phacelia Federal: None Coastal dunes and coastal sage This plant was not Phacelia stellaris State: None scrub. The species typically detected during CNPS: List 1 B.1 occurs in sandy openings, sandy focused surveys. benches, dunes, sandy washes, or Not expected to flood plains of rivers. occur due to a general lack of habitat. California muhly Federal: None Chaparral, coastal sage scrub, This plant was not Muhlenbergia californica State: None lower coniferous forest and detected during CNPS: List 4.3 meadows, usually near mesic focused surveys. seeps or along streambanks. Not expected to occur due to a general lack of habitat. California saw -grass Federal: None Meadows and seeps, and alkaline This plant was not Cladium californicum State: None or freshwater marshes and detected during CNPS: List 213.2 swamps. focused surveys. Does not occur due to a lack of suitable habitat. Chaparral ragwort Federal: None Chaparral, cismontane woodland, This plant was not Senecio aphanactis State: None coastal scrub. Sometimes detected during CNPS: List 26.2 associated with alkaline soils. focused surveys. Not expected to occur due to a general lack of habitat. Chaparral sand -verbena Federal: None Sandy soils in chaparral, coastal This plant was not Abronia villosa var. aurita State: None sage scrub. detected during CNPS: List 1 B.1 focused surveys. Low potential for occurrence. Coulter's goldfields Federal: None Playas, vernal pools, marshes and This plant was not Lasthenia glabrata ssp. State: None swamps (coastal salt). detected during coulteri CNPS: List 1 B.1 focused surveys. Does not occur due to a lack of Rev 3-1-16 P627 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00451 AND DRC2016-00508 Page 21 Species Name Status Less Than Occurrence Significant Less Federal: None Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No detected during Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Species Name Status Habitat Requirements Occurrence suitable habitat. Coulter's saltbush Federal: None Coastal bluff scrub, coastal dunes, This plant was not Atriplex coulteri State: None coastal sage scrub, valley and detected during CNPS: List 16.2 foothill grassland. Occurring on focused surveys. alkaline or clay soils. Does not occur due to a lack of suitable habitat. Lucky morning-glory Federal: None Historically associated with This plant was not Calystegia felix State: None wetland and marshy places, but detected during CNPS: List 3.1 possibly in drier situations as well. focused surveys Possibly silty loam and alkaline Does not occur soils. Meadows and seeps due to a lack of (sometimes alkaline), riparian suitable habitat. scrub (alluvial). Many -stemmed dudleya Federal: None Chaparral, coastal sage scrub, This plant was not Dudleya multicaulis State: None valley and foothill grassland. detected during CNPS: List 1 B.2 Often occurring in clay soils. focused surveys. Does not occur due to a lack of suitable habitat. Marsh sandwort Federal: FE Bogs and fens, freshwater This plant was not Arenaria paludicola State: SE marshes and swamps. detected during CNPS: List 1 B.1 focused surveys. Does not occur due to a lack of suitable habitat. Mesa horkelia Federal: None Sandy or gravelly soils in This plant was not Horkelia cuneata var. puberula State: None chaparral (maritime), cismontane detected during CNPS: List 16.1 woodland, and coastal scrub. focused surveys. Not expected to occur due to a general lack of habitat. Parish's desert -thorn Federal: None Coastal sage scrub, Sonoran This plant was not Lycium parishii State: None desert scrub detected during CNPS: List 213.3 focused surveys. Not expected to occur due to a general lack of habitat. Parry's spineflower Federal: None Sandy or rocky soils in open This plant was not Chorizanthe parryi var. parryi State: None habitats of chaparral and coastal detected during CNPS: List 1 B.1 sage scrub. focused surveys. Low potential for occurrence. Rev 3-1-16 P628 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00451 AND DRC2016-00508 Paqe 22 Species Name Status Less Than Occurrence Plummer's mariposa lily Federal: None Granitic, rock soils within Significant Less State: None Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: pp g Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No focused surveys. Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Species Name Status Habitat Requirements Occurrence Plummer's mariposa lily Federal: None Granitic, rock soils within This plant was not Calochortus plummerae State: None chaparral, cismontane woodland, detected during CNPS: List 4.2 coastal sage scrub, lower focused surveys. montane coniferous forest, valley Moderate and foothill grassland. potential for occurrence. Prairie wedge grass Federal: None Mesic soils in cismontane This plant was not Sphenopholis obtusata State: None woodland, meadows and seeps. detected during CNPS: List 26.2 focused surveys. Does not occur due to lack of suitable habitat. Robinson's pepper grass Federal: None Chaparral, coastal sage scrub. This plant was not Lepidium virginicum var. State: None detected during robinsonii CNPS: List 4.3 focused surveys. Low potential for occurrence. Salt marsh bird's -beak Federal: FE Coastal dune, coastal salt This plant was not Chloropyron maritimum ssp. State: SE marshes and swamps. detected during maritimum CNPS: List 16.2 focused surveys. Does not occur due to lack of suitable habitat. Salt Spring checkerbloom Federal: None Mesic, alkaline soils in chaparral, This plant was not Sidalcea neomexicana State: None coastal sage scrub, lower detected during CNPS: List 26.2 montane coniferous forest, focused surveys. Mojavean desert scrub, and Does not occur playas. due to lack of suitable habitat. San Bernardino aster Federal: None Cismontane woodland, coastal This plant was not Symphyotrichum defoliatum State: None scrub, lower montane coniferous detected during CNPS: List 1 B.2 forest, meadows and seeps, focused surveys. marshes and swamps, valley and Does not occur foothill grassland (vernally mesic). due to lack of suitable habitat. Santa Ana River woolly star Federal: FE Alluvial fan sage scrub, chaparral. This plant was not Eriastrum densifolium ssp. State: SE Occurring on sandy or rocky soils. detected during sanctorum CNPS: List 1 B.1 focused surveys. Low potential for occurrence. Slender -horned spineflower Federal: FE Sandy soils in alluvial scrub, This plant was not Dodecahema leptoceras State: SE chaparral, cismontane woodland. detected during CNPS: List 1 B.1 focused surveys. Low potential for occurrence. Rev 3-1-16 P629 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00451 AND DRC2016-00508 age 23 Species Name Status Less Than Occurrence Smooth tarplant Federal: None Alkaline soils in chenopod scrub, Significant Less State: None Issues and Supporting Information Sources: pp g Potentially ant Significant WRh Mitigation Than Significant No focused surveys. Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Species Name Status Habitat Requirements Occurrence Smooth tarplant Federal: None Alkaline soils in chenopod scrub, This plant was not Centromadia pungens ssp. State: None meadows and seeps, playas, detected during laevis CNPS: List 1 B.1 riparian woodland, valley and focused surveys. foothill grasslands, disturbed Does not occur habitats. due to lack of suitable habitat. White rabbit -tobacco Federal: None Sandy or gravelly soils in This plant was not Pseudognaphalium State: None chaparral, cismontane woodland, detected during leucocephalum CNPS: List 26.2 coastal scrub, and riparian focused surveys. woodland. Does not occur due to lack of suitable habitat. Status Federal FE — Federally Endangered FT — Federally Threatened FC — Federal Candidate State SE — State Endangered ST — State Threatened CNPS Rank 1A — Plants presumed extirpated in California and either rare or extinct elsewhere. Rank 1 B — Plants rare, threatened, or endangered in California and elsewhere. Rank 2A — Plants presumed extirpated in California, but common elsewhere. Rank 213 — Plants rare, threatened, or endangered in California, but more common elsewhere. Rank 3 — Plants about which more information is needed (a review list). Rank 4 — Plants of limited distribution (a watch list). Threat Code extension .1 — Seriously endangered in California (over 80% occurrences threatened) .2 — Fairly endangered in California (20-80% occurrences threatened) .3 — Not very endangered in California (<20% of occurrences threatened or no current threats known) Special Status Animals Survey Summary Two special -status small mammals (northwestern San Diego pocket mouse and desert woodrat) were detected at the project site during the trapping study. Both species were trapped in very low densities. The coastal California gnatcatcher and burrowing owl were both confirmed absent through focused surveys. No other special -status animals were detected at the project site, although the site has the potential to support several non - listed, special -status reptile species that were not observed at the site during the various surveys, but whose absence could not be ruled out. The potential for these species is relatively low based on the past disturbance of the site, and general isolation of the site. If present, the reptile species are likely to occur in low densities. Based on the results of the focused biological surveys, the project will not impact any federally or state -listed animal species, including the coastal California gnatcatcher (CAGN) and the San Bernardino kangaroo rat (SBKR), and therefore "take" authorization Rev 3-1-16 P630 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00451 AND DRC2016-00508 age 24 would not be required for the project. Based on the results of the trapping study, the project will remove habitat supporting two non -listed, special -status small mammals, including the desert woodrat and northwestern San Diego pocket mouse. In addition, the project will remove habitat with the potential to support several non -listed, special -status reptiles, including the coast horned lizard, orangethroat whiptail, rosy boa, red diamond rattlesnake, and silvery legless lizard. However, due to relatively small size and the general isolation of the site, and the relatively low sensitivity of these species, the loss of habitat at the property would not have a substantial, adverse effect on these species. Therefore, the impacts would be less than significant and would not require mitigation for small mammals. Although burrowing owls were not detected at the Project site during focused surveys, limited portions of the site have the potential to support owls in the future. Direct impacts to burrowing owls are not permitted pursuant to the California Fish and Game Code, and so if burrowing owls were to be present during construction, those owls would have to be properly excluded from the site following accepted protocols, and subject to the approval of an exclusion plan by CDFW. As such, mitigation measures are required for pre - disturbance surveys to be performed prior to the initiation of grading or other activities that might disturb burrowing owl habitat. Table 4-2. Special Status Animals Evaluated for the Project Site Potential for Species Name Status Habitat Requirements Occurrence Less Delhi -sands flower -loving fly Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: ppgSignificant PotentiallyThan LLessThan Significant No associated with wholly or Im act Raphiomidas terminatus Impact Impact would not be required for the project. Based on the results of the trapping study, the project will remove habitat supporting two non -listed, special -status small mammals, including the desert woodrat and northwestern San Diego pocket mouse. In addition, the project will remove habitat with the potential to support several non -listed, special -status reptiles, including the coast horned lizard, orangethroat whiptail, rosy boa, red diamond rattlesnake, and silvery legless lizard. However, due to relatively small size and the general isolation of the site, and the relatively low sensitivity of these species, the loss of habitat at the property would not have a substantial, adverse effect on these species. Therefore, the impacts would be less than significant and would not require mitigation for small mammals. Although burrowing owls were not detected at the Project site during focused surveys, limited portions of the site have the potential to support owls in the future. Direct impacts to burrowing owls are not permitted pursuant to the California Fish and Game Code, and so if burrowing owls were to be present during construction, those owls would have to be properly excluded from the site following accepted protocols, and subject to the approval of an exclusion plan by CDFW. As such, mitigation measures are required for pre - disturbance surveys to be performed prior to the initiation of grading or other activities that might disturb burrowing owl habitat. Table 4-2. Special Status Animals Evaluated for the Project Site Rev 3-1-16 Potential for Species Name Status Habitat Requirements Occurrence Invertebrates Delhi -sands flower -loving fly Federal: FE Fine, sandy soils, often Does not occur due to (DSFLF) State: None associated with wholly or a lack of suitable Raphiomidas terminatus partially consolidated habitat. abdominalis dunes referred to as the "Delhi" series. Vegetation consists of a sparse cover, including Californica buckwheat, California croton, deerweed, and evening primrose. Reptiles California mountain kingsnake (San Federal: None Bigcone spruce and Not expected to occur Bernardino population) State: SSC chaparral at lower due to general lack of Lampropeltis zonata (parvirubra) elevations. Black oak, habitat. incense cedar, Jeffery pine, and ponderosa pine at higher elevations. Coast horned lizard Federal: None Occurs in a variety of Low potential to occur, Phrynosoma blainvillii State: SSC vegetation types including but not observed coastal sage scrub, during biological Rev 3-1-16 P631 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00451 AND DRC2016-00508 Paae 25 Rev 3-1-16 Less Than Potential for Species Name Status Habitat Requirements Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PP g Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incor orated Impact Impart Rev 3-1-16 Potential for Species Name Status Habitat Requirements Occurrence chaparral, annual surveys. grassland, oak woodland, and riparian woodlands. Orangethroat whiptail Federal: None Coastal sage scrub, Low potential to occur, Aspidoscelis hyperythra State: SSC chaparral, non-native but not observed grassland, oak woodland, during biological and uni er woodland. surveys. Red -diamond rattlesnake Federal: None Habitats with heavy brush Low potential to occur, Crotalus ruber State: SSC and rock outcrops, but not observed including coastal sage during biological scrub and chaparral. surveys. Rosy boa Federal: None Coastal sage scrub, Low potential to occur, Charina trivirgata State: None chaparral, or mixed but not observed habitats, commonly with during biological rocky soils and outcrops. surveys. Also in oak woodlands and riparian areas bordering scrub habitats. Silvery legless lizard Federal: None Occurs primarily in areas Low potential to occur, Anniella pulchra pulchra State: SSC with sandy or loose but not observed organic soil, or where during biological there is plenty of leaf surveys. litter. Associated with coastal sage scrub, chaparral, coastal dunes, valley/foothill grasslands, oak woodlands, and pine forests. Two -striped garter snake Federal: None Aquatic snake typically Does not occur due to Thamnophis hammondii State: SSC associated with wetland a lack of suitable habitats such as streams, habitat. creeks, and pools. Western pond turtle Federal: None Slow-moving permanent Does not occur due to Emys marmorata State: SSC or intermittent streams, a lack of suitable small ponds and lakes, habitat. reservoirs, abandoned gravel pits, permanent and ephemeral shallow wetlands, stock ponds, and treatment lagoons. Abundant basking sites and cover necessary, including logs, rocks, submerged vegetation, and undercut banks. Birds Rev 3-1-16 P632 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00451 AND DRC2016-00508 Pape 26 . ......... .... .... ...... ........ . . . ..... ..... _.... . Less Than Species Name Status ' Habitat Requirements Occurrence Burrowing owl (burrow sites & some Significant Less Moderate potential to Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: pp g Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact . ......... .... .... ...... ........ . . . ..... ..... _.... . Potential for Species Name Status ' Habitat Requirements Occurrence Burrowing owl (burrow sites & some Federal: BCC Shortgrass prairies, Moderate potential to wintering sites) State: SSC grasslands, lowland occur, but determined Athene cunicularia scrub, agricultural lands absent through (particularly rangelands), focused surveys. coastal dunes, desert floors, and some artificial, open areas as a year- long resident. Occupies abandoned ground squirrel burrows as well as artificial structures such as culverts and under asses. Coastal cactus wren Federal: BCC Occurs almost exclusively Does not occur due to Campylorhynchus brunneicapillus State: SSC in cactus (cholla and a lack of suitable sandiegensis prickly pear) dominated habitat. coastal sage scrub. Coastal California gnatcatcher Federal: FT Low elevation coastal Moderate potential to Polioptila californica californica State: SSC sage scrub and coastal occur, but determined bluff scrub. absent through focused surveys. Golden eagle (nesting & wintering) Federal: BCC In southern California, Does not occur due to Aquila chrysaetos State: WL, FP occupies grasslands, a lack of suitable brushlands, deserts, oak habitat. savannas,open coniferous forests, and montane valleys. Nests on rock outcrops and ledges. Grasshopper sparrow (nesting) Federal: None Open grassland and Not expected to occur Ammodramus savannarum State: SSC prairies with patches of due to the general lack bare ground. of habitat. Least Bell's vireo (nesting) Federal: FE Dense riparian habitats Does not occur due to Vireo bellii pusillus State: SE with a stratified canopy, a lack of suitable including southern willow habitat. scrub, mule fat scrub, and riparian forest. Loggerhead shrike (nesting) Federal: BCC Forages over open Low potential to occur, Lanius ludovicianus State: SSC ground within areas of but not observed short vegetation, pastures during biological with fence rows, old surveys. orchards, mowed roadsides, cemeteries, golf courses, riparian areas, open woodland, Rev 3-1-16 P633 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00451 AND DRC2016-00508 Paae 27 Rev 3-1-16 Less Than Potential for Species Name Status Habitat Requirements Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant with Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Rev 3-1-16 Potential for Species Name Status Habitat Requirements Occurrence agricultural fields, desert washes, desert scrub, grassland, broken chaparral and beach with scattered shrubs. Southwestern willow flycatcher Federal: FE Riparian woodlands along Does not occur due to (nesting) State: SE streams and rivers with a lack of suitable Empidonax trail/ii extimus mature dense thickets of habitat. trees and shrubs. Tricolored blackbird (nesting Federal: BCC Breeding colonies require Does not occur due to colony) State: SE, nearby water, a suitable a lack of suitable Agelaius tricolor SSC nesting substrate, and habitat. open -range foraging habitat of natural grassland, woodland, or a riculturaI cropland. Western yellow -billed cuckoo Federal: FT, Dense, wide riparian Does not occur due to (nesting) BCC woodlands with well- a lack of suitable Coccyzus americanus occidentalis State: SE developed understories. habitat. White-tailed kite (nesting) Federal: None Low elevation open Low potential to occur Elanus leucurus State: FP grasslands, savannah- for foraging, but not like habitats, agricultural observed during areas, wetlands, and oak biological surveys. woodlands. Dense The site does not canopies used for nesting contain suitable and cover. breedinghabitat. Yellow -breasted chat (nesting) Federal: None Dense, relatively wide Does not occur due to Icteria virens State: SSC riparian woodlands and a lack of suitable thickets of willows, vine habitat. tangles, and dense brush with well-developed understories. Yellow warbler (nesting) Federal: BCC Breed in lowland and Does not occur due to Setophaga petechia State: SSC foothill riparian a lack of suitable woodlands dominated by habitat. cottonwoods, alders, or willows and other small trees and shrubs typical of low, open -canopy riparian woodland. During migration, forages in woodland, forest, and shrub habitats. Mammals Rev 3-1-16 P634 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00451 AND DRC2016-00508 Paae 28 Rev 3-1-16 Less Than Potential for Species Name Status Habitat Requirements Significant Less Federal: None Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentiallyignifnt Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No determined absent Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Rev 3-1-16 Potential for Species Name Status Habitat Requirements Occurrence Los Angeles pocket mouse Federal: None Fine, sandy soils in This species was Perognathus longimembris State: SSC coastal sage scrub and determined absent brevinasus grasslands. through trapping. Low potential for occurrence. Northwestern San Diego pocket Federal: None Coastal sage scrub, sage Present. mouse State: SSC scrub/grassland Chaetodipus fallax fallax ecotones, and chaparral. Pallid bat Federal: None Deserts, grasslands, Does not occur due to Antrozous pallidus State: SSC shrublands, woodlands, a lack of suitable and forests. Most habitat. common in open, dry habitats with rocky areas for roosting. Pocketed free -tailed bat Federal: None Rocky areas with high Does not occur due to Nyctinomops femorosaccus State: SSC cliffs in pine -juniper a lack of suitable woodlands, desert scrub, habitat. palm oasis, desert wash, and desert riparian. San Bernardino kangaroo rat Federal: FE Typically found in This species was Dipodomys merriami parvus State: SSC Riversidean alluvial fan determined absent sage scrub and sandy through trapping. loam soils, alluvial fans and floodplains, and along washes with nearby sa a scrub. San Diego black -tailed jackrabbit Federal: None Occupies a variety of Low potential to occur, Lepus californicus bennettii State: SSC habitats, but is most but not observed common among during biological shortgrass habitats. Also surveys. occurs in sage scrub, but needs open habitats. San Diego desert woodrat Federal: None Occurs in a variety of Present. Neotoma lepida intermedia State: SSC shrub and desert habitats, primarily associated with rock outcrops, boulders, cacti, or areas of dense under rowth. Southern grasshopper mouse Federal: None Desert areas, especially This species was Onychomys torridus ramona State: SSC scrub habitats with friable determined absent soils for digging. Prefers through trapping. Low low to moderate shrub potential for cover. occurrence. Rev 3-1-16 P635 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00451 AND DRC2016-00508 Page 29 Small Mammal Trapping Two special -status small mammals were detected during the trapping study in low numbers, including the desert woodrat (one individual) and the northwestern San Diego pocket mouse (six individuals). No listed small mammals were detected during the trapping study, including the San Bernardino kangaroo rat (SBKR) and the Stephens' kangaroo rat (SKR), and so both are considered absent from the site. Also confirmed absent was the Los Angeles pocket mouse (LAPM). Altogether, five small mammal species were detected, including the aforementioned woodrat and pocket mouse, as well as the Dulzura Kangaroo Rat (Dipodomys simulans), deer mouse (Peromyscus maniculatis), and harvest mouse (Reithrodontomys megalotis). FOCUSED SURVEYS: GNATCATCHER, DELHI SANDS FLOWER LOVING FLY AND SAN BERNARDINO KANGAROO RAT GNATCATCHER The gnatcatcher is designated as a federally threatened species and as a California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) Species of Special Concern. Focused gnatcatcher surveys were conducted at the project site between November 6, 2015 and March 1, 2016 in all areas of suitable habitat in accordance with U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) guidelines. The gnatcatcher was not detected at the project site. Rev 3-1-16 Less Than Potential for Species Name Status Habitat Requirements Significant Less Federal: FE Issues and SU ortin Information Sources: pp g Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No determined absent Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Small Mammal Trapping Two special -status small mammals were detected during the trapping study in low numbers, including the desert woodrat (one individual) and the northwestern San Diego pocket mouse (six individuals). No listed small mammals were detected during the trapping study, including the San Bernardino kangaroo rat (SBKR) and the Stephens' kangaroo rat (SKR), and so both are considered absent from the site. Also confirmed absent was the Los Angeles pocket mouse (LAPM). Altogether, five small mammal species were detected, including the aforementioned woodrat and pocket mouse, as well as the Dulzura Kangaroo Rat (Dipodomys simulans), deer mouse (Peromyscus maniculatis), and harvest mouse (Reithrodontomys megalotis). FOCUSED SURVEYS: GNATCATCHER, DELHI SANDS FLOWER LOVING FLY AND SAN BERNARDINO KANGAROO RAT GNATCATCHER The gnatcatcher is designated as a federally threatened species and as a California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) Species of Special Concern. Focused gnatcatcher surveys were conducted at the project site between November 6, 2015 and March 1, 2016 in all areas of suitable habitat in accordance with U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) guidelines. The gnatcatcher was not detected at the project site. Rev 3-1-16 Potential for Species Name Status Habitat Requirements Occurrence Stephens' kangaroo rat Federal: FE Open grasslands or This species was Dipodomys stephensi State: ST sparse shrublands with determined absent less than 50% vegetation through trapping. Not cover during the summer. expected to occur due to a general lack of habitat. Western mastiff bat Federal: None Occurs in many open, Does not occur due to Eumops perotis californicus State: SSC semi -arid to and habitats, a lack of suitable including conifer and habitat. deciduous woodlands, coastal scrub, grasslands, and chaparral. Roosts in crevices in cliff faces, high buildings, trees, and tunnels. Western yellow bat Federal: None Found in valley foothill Does not occur due to Lasiurus xanthinus State: SSC riparian, desert riparian, a lack of suitable desert wash, and palm habitat. oasis habitats. Roosts in trees, particularly palms. Forages over water and among trees. Small Mammal Trapping Two special -status small mammals were detected during the trapping study in low numbers, including the desert woodrat (one individual) and the northwestern San Diego pocket mouse (six individuals). No listed small mammals were detected during the trapping study, including the San Bernardino kangaroo rat (SBKR) and the Stephens' kangaroo rat (SKR), and so both are considered absent from the site. Also confirmed absent was the Los Angeles pocket mouse (LAPM). Altogether, five small mammal species were detected, including the aforementioned woodrat and pocket mouse, as well as the Dulzura Kangaroo Rat (Dipodomys simulans), deer mouse (Peromyscus maniculatis), and harvest mouse (Reithrodontomys megalotis). FOCUSED SURVEYS: GNATCATCHER, DELHI SANDS FLOWER LOVING FLY AND SAN BERNARDINO KANGAROO RAT GNATCATCHER The gnatcatcher is designated as a federally threatened species and as a California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) Species of Special Concern. Focused gnatcatcher surveys were conducted at the project site between November 6, 2015 and March 1, 2016 in all areas of suitable habitat in accordance with U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) guidelines. The gnatcatcher was not detected at the project site. Rev 3-1-16 P636 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00451 AND DRC2016-00508 Page 30 Protocol surveys for the gnatcatcher were performed in all suitable areas of CSS habitat on site. Surveys were conducted in accordance with the 1997 USFWS guidelines, which stipulate that during the non -breeding season, nine surveys shall be conducted in all areas of suitable habitat with at least 14 days between site visits. The USFWS survey guidelines also stipulate that no more than 80 acres of suitable habitat shall be surveyed per biologist per day. Because the overall site supports less than 80 acres of coastal sage scrub, the project site was treated as one survey polygon [Exhibit 3 -Site Map of Biological Technical Resources Report]. GLA biologist Kevin Livergood (TE -172638-2) conducted one protocol survey on November 6, 2015. GLA biologist David Moskovitz (TE -084606-2) conducted protocol surveys on November 20, 2015, December 21, 2015, and February 2 and 16, 2016. GLA biologist Jeff Ahrens conducted protocol surveys under Ms. Ingrid Eich's recovery permit (TE 092469-2.1) on November 20, 2015, January 4 and 18, 2016 and March 1, 2016. 1 All surveys were conducted during the morning hours and were completed before 12:00 P.M. No surveys were conducted during extreme weather conditions (i.e., winds exceeding 15 miles per hour, rain, or temperatures in excess of 350C). All areas of suitable habitat were surveyed on foot by walking slowly and methodically. Taped vocalizations and "pishing" sounds were utilized to elicit a response from gnatcatchers that might be present. Table 1 summarizes survey dates and weather conditions. Table 1 (Gnatcatcher Surveys) Date Start Time Less Than Temp IF (start/end) Wind speed (mph) Cloud Cover (start/end) Surveyor Significant Less 1030 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No 0700 Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Protocol surveys for the gnatcatcher were performed in all suitable areas of CSS habitat on site. Surveys were conducted in accordance with the 1997 USFWS guidelines, which stipulate that during the non -breeding season, nine surveys shall be conducted in all areas of suitable habitat with at least 14 days between site visits. The USFWS survey guidelines also stipulate that no more than 80 acres of suitable habitat shall be surveyed per biologist per day. Because the overall site supports less than 80 acres of coastal sage scrub, the project site was treated as one survey polygon [Exhibit 3 -Site Map of Biological Technical Resources Report]. GLA biologist Kevin Livergood (TE -172638-2) conducted one protocol survey on November 6, 2015. GLA biologist David Moskovitz (TE -084606-2) conducted protocol surveys on November 20, 2015, December 21, 2015, and February 2 and 16, 2016. GLA biologist Jeff Ahrens conducted protocol surveys under Ms. Ingrid Eich's recovery permit (TE 092469-2.1) on November 20, 2015, January 4 and 18, 2016 and March 1, 2016. 1 All surveys were conducted during the morning hours and were completed before 12:00 P.M. No surveys were conducted during extreme weather conditions (i.e., winds exceeding 15 miles per hour, rain, or temperatures in excess of 350C). All areas of suitable habitat were surveyed on foot by walking slowly and methodically. Taped vocalizations and "pishing" sounds were utilized to elicit a response from gnatcatchers that might be present. Table 1 summarizes survey dates and weather conditions. Table 1 (Gnatcatcher Surveys) Date Start Time End Time Temp IF (start/end) Wind speed (mph) Cloud Cover (start/end) Surveyor 11/06/15 0740 1030 57/68 6/10 Clear/Clear KL 11/20/15 0700 1040 53/76 2/2 Clear/Clear JA 12/4/15 0700 1030 47/54 2/1 40/90 JA/SC 12/21/15 0945 1200 50/55 2/2 Clear/Clear DM 1/4/16 0800 1125 54/56 3/2 100/70 JA 1/18/16 0820 1050 52/52 1/2 100/100 JA 2/2/16 1030 1240 50/55 2/2 Clear/Clear DM 2/16/16 0815 1130 74/83 2/4 Clear/Clear DM 3/1/16 0830 1130 66/74 1/3 75/60 JA JA = Jeff Ahrens, DM = Dave Moskovitz, KL = Kevin Livergood RESULTS FOR GNATCATCHER The gnatcatcher was not detected on site during focused surveys; therefore no mitigation is required for impacts to the Gnatcatcher. Common birds identified on or in close proximity to the site include house finch (Carpodacus mexicanus), blue -gray gnatcatcher (Polioptila caerulea), California towhee (Pipilo crissalis), Anna's hummingbird (Calypte anna), Bewick's wren (Thryomanes bewickii), northern flicker (Colaptes auratus), and northern mockingbird (Mimus polyglottos). Rev 3-1-16 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00451 AND DRC2016-00508 Paqe 31 DELHI SANDS FLOWER LOVING FLY In order to meet the environmental documentation and review requirements, potentially occurring sensitive biological resources must be addressed to demonstrate the applicant's conformance to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the federal Endangered Species Act (Act). As a federally -listed endangered species, a Habitat Suitability Evaluation was performed for the Delhi Sands flower -loving fly (Rhaphiomidas terminatus abdominalis --herein DSFF). A DSFF Habitat Suitability Evaluation was performed by Ecological Sciences (January 2016). According to the Evaluation, the Service listed the DSFF as an endangered species on September 23, 1993. This species is only known to occur in association with Delhi sand deposits (USFWS 1997), primarily on twelve disjunct sites within a radius of about eight miles in the cities of Colton, Rialto, and Fontana in southwestern San Bernardino and northwestern Riverside counties. However, recent survey data (1997-03) indicates that DSFF occur in low numbers in Ontario, and also in sub -optimal habitat conditions. The DSFF is restricted to the Colton Dunes, which covers approximately 40 square miles. More than 95 percent of the formerly known habitat has been converted to human uses or severely affected by human activities, rendering it apparently unsuitable for occupation by the species Subregional areas encompassing smaller areas known to be inhabited by the DSFF or encompassing areas that contain restorable habitat for the DSFF have been grouped into three Recovery Units (RUs) by the Service based on geographic proximity, similarity of habitat, and potential genetic exchange (USFWS 1997). The subject site is located within an area designated as the Ontario RU. The Ontario RU historically contained the largest block of the Colton Dunes; however, most lands in this RU have been converted to agriculture, or developed for commercial and residential projects (USFWS 1997). The Ontario RU contains several areas that currently support DSFF, and additional areas have been proposed for restoration in the DSFF Recovery Plan. The occupied and/or potentially restorable habitat in the RUs includes only those areas that, at a minimum, contain Delhi Series soils. Further, RUs do not include residential and commercial development, or areas that have been otherwise permanently altered by human actions (USFWS 1997). DSFF will continue to exist in the Ontario RU only with land conservation, a cessation of current habitat -degrading land management practices and recreational uses, and/or a restoration or natural reversion of ecologically damaged lands back to an ecological community typical of Delhi sands formations. Potentially suitable habitats remaining in the Ontario RU are highly fragmented, and as such, the establishment of a permanent long-term reserve in this RU is currently unresolved. While many degraded sites are currently unsuitable to support DSFF, DSFF have been recorded on certain properties that have been heavily disturbed in the past (e.g., previously graded and/or scraped sites where a cessation of disturbance -related land uses have occurred such that a degree of natural conditions now occur). Accordingly, DSFF may persist on, or disperse to, certain properties that have not been exposed to recurring and/or recent land disturbances. These previously disturbed properties may be important for future preservation of the species in the region. In addition, individual DSFF have been recorded in areas generally considered unsuitable to support this taxon, and with no apparent connectivity to occupied DSFF habitats. Rev 3-1-16 P637 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: pp g Pany Signifignificant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact DELHI SANDS FLOWER LOVING FLY In order to meet the environmental documentation and review requirements, potentially occurring sensitive biological resources must be addressed to demonstrate the applicant's conformance to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the federal Endangered Species Act (Act). As a federally -listed endangered species, a Habitat Suitability Evaluation was performed for the Delhi Sands flower -loving fly (Rhaphiomidas terminatus abdominalis --herein DSFF). A DSFF Habitat Suitability Evaluation was performed by Ecological Sciences (January 2016). According to the Evaluation, the Service listed the DSFF as an endangered species on September 23, 1993. This species is only known to occur in association with Delhi sand deposits (USFWS 1997), primarily on twelve disjunct sites within a radius of about eight miles in the cities of Colton, Rialto, and Fontana in southwestern San Bernardino and northwestern Riverside counties. However, recent survey data (1997-03) indicates that DSFF occur in low numbers in Ontario, and also in sub -optimal habitat conditions. The DSFF is restricted to the Colton Dunes, which covers approximately 40 square miles. More than 95 percent of the formerly known habitat has been converted to human uses or severely affected by human activities, rendering it apparently unsuitable for occupation by the species Subregional areas encompassing smaller areas known to be inhabited by the DSFF or encompassing areas that contain restorable habitat for the DSFF have been grouped into three Recovery Units (RUs) by the Service based on geographic proximity, similarity of habitat, and potential genetic exchange (USFWS 1997). The subject site is located within an area designated as the Ontario RU. The Ontario RU historically contained the largest block of the Colton Dunes; however, most lands in this RU have been converted to agriculture, or developed for commercial and residential projects (USFWS 1997). The Ontario RU contains several areas that currently support DSFF, and additional areas have been proposed for restoration in the DSFF Recovery Plan. The occupied and/or potentially restorable habitat in the RUs includes only those areas that, at a minimum, contain Delhi Series soils. Further, RUs do not include residential and commercial development, or areas that have been otherwise permanently altered by human actions (USFWS 1997). DSFF will continue to exist in the Ontario RU only with land conservation, a cessation of current habitat -degrading land management practices and recreational uses, and/or a restoration or natural reversion of ecologically damaged lands back to an ecological community typical of Delhi sands formations. Potentially suitable habitats remaining in the Ontario RU are highly fragmented, and as such, the establishment of a permanent long-term reserve in this RU is currently unresolved. While many degraded sites are currently unsuitable to support DSFF, DSFF have been recorded on certain properties that have been heavily disturbed in the past (e.g., previously graded and/or scraped sites where a cessation of disturbance -related land uses have occurred such that a degree of natural conditions now occur). Accordingly, DSFF may persist on, or disperse to, certain properties that have not been exposed to recurring and/or recent land disturbances. These previously disturbed properties may be important for future preservation of the species in the region. In addition, individual DSFF have been recorded in areas generally considered unsuitable to support this taxon, and with no apparent connectivity to occupied DSFF habitats. Rev 3-1-16 P637 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00451 AND DRC2016-00508 Page 32 Ecological Sciences conducted a reconnaissance -level field survey on the subject site to evaluate potential habitat for DSFF on December 15, 2015. The survey was conducted by Scott Cameron, Principal Biologist of Ecological Sciences, Inc. Mr. Cameron holds a current federal permit to conduct focused survey for this species (TE -808642-8). Ecological Sciences biologists have observed numerous DSFF in the field since 1995, and have extensive experience conducting both focused surveys and habitat evaluations for this sensitive taxon. Ecological Sciences is well versed with the biotic characteristics of a range of habitats occupied by DSFF, as well as other sensitive wildlife species potentially occurring in the area. The site was examined on foot by walking a series of meandering transects across the subject property. As mentioned, the primary objective of the one -day field visit was to generally evaluate the site's potential to support DSFF. Dominant plant species and other habitat characteristics present at the site were identified to assess the overall habitat value. Weather conditions included partly cloudy skies, 1-5 mph breezes, and ambient temperatures of 50-55 OF. The subject site is characterized as a vacant lot dominated by dense (±90-95% cover) native mixed scrub vegetation. Dominant native plant species recorded on site include California buckwheat (Eriogonum fasciculatum), California sagebrush (Artemisia californica), buckbrush (Ceanothus sp.), scalebroom (Lepidospartum squamatum), goldenbush (Ericameria or Hazardia or Isocoma spp.), California croton (Croton californicus), and chaparral dodder (Cuscuta californica). Non-native species recorded included horehound (Marubium vulgare), Mediterranean grass (Schismus arabicus), short podded mustard (Hirschfeldia incana), salt cedar (Tamarix ramosissima), and gum (Eucalyptus sp.) A review of soil maps prepared for the area by the Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS 2015) indicate that the subject site is located within an area mapped as containing Tujunga loamy sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes (TuB) and Tujunga gravelly loamy sand, 0 to 9 percent slopes (TvC). A general soils field analysis was conducted due to the close association of DSFF to mostly open, sandy friable soils. The site is primarily characterized by compacted gravels and cobbles. No Delhi series soils or other friable soil types were recorded on site. RESULTS FOR DELHI SANDS FLOWER LOVING FLY (DSFF) DSFF have relatively narrow habitat requirements that are determined by appropriate plant species and open sand as defining characteristics (Kingsley 1996). It has long been established that a gradient of suitability exists composed of varying degrees of natural and artificial conditions. Observations such as the DSFFs apparent avoidance of dense (both native and non-native) vegetation (>75% coverage) or general avoidance of vegetation that is sparse or not present at all (<5% coverage) appear to suggest that DSFF generally select habitats with a combination of some vegetation, including several species of plants, and some open space with bare sand (Kiyani 1996). The presence of Delhi soils appears to be the most determinative factor of whether an area can provide suitable DSFF habitat. Delhi sands constitute the primary component of a complex ecosystem. A variety of microhabitat characteristics generally constitute potential DSFF habitat (e.g., Delhi soils, vegetation composition, soil chemistry, topography, percent vegetative cover, frequency of non-native plant species, exposure to disturbances, etc.). While the aforementioned microhabitat conditions are considered optimal/essential to support DSFF, DSFF sometimes occur in areas not typically considered suitable for this taxon. Although individual DSFF have been recorded from sites supporting mostly ruderal, Rev 3-1-16 P638 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Ecological Sciences conducted a reconnaissance -level field survey on the subject site to evaluate potential habitat for DSFF on December 15, 2015. The survey was conducted by Scott Cameron, Principal Biologist of Ecological Sciences, Inc. Mr. Cameron holds a current federal permit to conduct focused survey for this species (TE -808642-8). Ecological Sciences biologists have observed numerous DSFF in the field since 1995, and have extensive experience conducting both focused surveys and habitat evaluations for this sensitive taxon. Ecological Sciences is well versed with the biotic characteristics of a range of habitats occupied by DSFF, as well as other sensitive wildlife species potentially occurring in the area. The site was examined on foot by walking a series of meandering transects across the subject property. As mentioned, the primary objective of the one -day field visit was to generally evaluate the site's potential to support DSFF. Dominant plant species and other habitat characteristics present at the site were identified to assess the overall habitat value. Weather conditions included partly cloudy skies, 1-5 mph breezes, and ambient temperatures of 50-55 OF. The subject site is characterized as a vacant lot dominated by dense (±90-95% cover) native mixed scrub vegetation. Dominant native plant species recorded on site include California buckwheat (Eriogonum fasciculatum), California sagebrush (Artemisia californica), buckbrush (Ceanothus sp.), scalebroom (Lepidospartum squamatum), goldenbush (Ericameria or Hazardia or Isocoma spp.), California croton (Croton californicus), and chaparral dodder (Cuscuta californica). Non-native species recorded included horehound (Marubium vulgare), Mediterranean grass (Schismus arabicus), short podded mustard (Hirschfeldia incana), salt cedar (Tamarix ramosissima), and gum (Eucalyptus sp.) A review of soil maps prepared for the area by the Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS 2015) indicate that the subject site is located within an area mapped as containing Tujunga loamy sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes (TuB) and Tujunga gravelly loamy sand, 0 to 9 percent slopes (TvC). A general soils field analysis was conducted due to the close association of DSFF to mostly open, sandy friable soils. The site is primarily characterized by compacted gravels and cobbles. No Delhi series soils or other friable soil types were recorded on site. RESULTS FOR DELHI SANDS FLOWER LOVING FLY (DSFF) DSFF have relatively narrow habitat requirements that are determined by appropriate plant species and open sand as defining characteristics (Kingsley 1996). It has long been established that a gradient of suitability exists composed of varying degrees of natural and artificial conditions. Observations such as the DSFFs apparent avoidance of dense (both native and non-native) vegetation (>75% coverage) or general avoidance of vegetation that is sparse or not present at all (<5% coverage) appear to suggest that DSFF generally select habitats with a combination of some vegetation, including several species of plants, and some open space with bare sand (Kiyani 1996). The presence of Delhi soils appears to be the most determinative factor of whether an area can provide suitable DSFF habitat. Delhi sands constitute the primary component of a complex ecosystem. A variety of microhabitat characteristics generally constitute potential DSFF habitat (e.g., Delhi soils, vegetation composition, soil chemistry, topography, percent vegetative cover, frequency of non-native plant species, exposure to disturbances, etc.). While the aforementioned microhabitat conditions are considered optimal/essential to support DSFF, DSFF sometimes occur in areas not typically considered suitable for this taxon. Although individual DSFF have been recorded from sites supporting mostly ruderal, Rev 3-1-16 P638 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00451 AND DRC2016-00508 Page 33 non-native vegetation, most known DSFF- occupied sites contain areas, or are adjacent to areas, of relatively undisturbed exposed patches of friable, sandy soils in association with selected native plant species. None of these conditions are present on or adjacent to the project site. There is no connectivity to the subject site from the nearest known DSFF recent occurrence record (5.8 miles south of the site) due to the presence of existing development that surrounds the site. While this species likely has the capability of dispersing over relatively large distances of seemingly unsuitable habitats under certain circumstances, it would be reasonable to assume (based on our current knowledge of the species) that there is no real likelihood of DSFF dispersing to the subject site from the nearest known off-site occupied area (or historically occupied), as no suitable habitat is present on site (e.g., presence of only compacted gravel and cobble soils and absence of friable soils). Accordingly, the subject site would not be considered a viable property for preservation or restoration due absence of suitable habitat, geographic location, isolation from areas supporting DSFF populations, and surrounding land uses which have long since fragmented potential DSFF habitat in the area. Based on results of the December 2015 habitat suitability evaluation, existing conditions present at the site are not consistent with those known or expected to support DSFF. No exposed natural or semi- natural open areas with unconsolidated wind -worked granitic soils or dunes are present. Substrate conditions are not consistent with those most often correlated with potential DSFF habitat and no DSFF plant associations are present on site. Under current conditions, the site would generally be considered prohibitive to DSSF occupation. The underlying soil environment appears to be the most definitive factor of whether an area could potentially support DSFF. Accordingly, the quality of soils present within the study area was rated for its potential to support DSFF. No areas of the site are mapped as Delhi soils; however the substrates present were visually inspected and rated based on a scale of 1 to 5, with 5 being the best quality and most suitable habitat in the biologist's judgment: Soils dominated by heavy deposits of alluvial material including coarse sands and gravels with little or no Delhi sands and evidence of soil compaction. Unsuitable. 2. Delhi sands are present but the soil characteristics include a predominance of alluvial materials (Tujunga Soils). Very Low Quality. 3. Although not clean, sufficient Delhi sands are present to prevent soil compaction. Some sandy soils exposed on the surface due to fossorial animal activity. Low Quality. 4. Abundant clean Delhi sands with little or no alluvial material or Tujunga soils present. Moderate abundance of exposed sands on the soil surface. Low vegetative cover. Evidence of moderate degree of fossorial animal activity by vertebrates and invertebrates. Moderate Quality Rev 3-1-16 P639 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: P Significant am ant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Im act non-native vegetation, most known DSFF- occupied sites contain areas, or are adjacent to areas, of relatively undisturbed exposed patches of friable, sandy soils in association with selected native plant species. None of these conditions are present on or adjacent to the project site. There is no connectivity to the subject site from the nearest known DSFF recent occurrence record (5.8 miles south of the site) due to the presence of existing development that surrounds the site. While this species likely has the capability of dispersing over relatively large distances of seemingly unsuitable habitats under certain circumstances, it would be reasonable to assume (based on our current knowledge of the species) that there is no real likelihood of DSFF dispersing to the subject site from the nearest known off-site occupied area (or historically occupied), as no suitable habitat is present on site (e.g., presence of only compacted gravel and cobble soils and absence of friable soils). Accordingly, the subject site would not be considered a viable property for preservation or restoration due absence of suitable habitat, geographic location, isolation from areas supporting DSFF populations, and surrounding land uses which have long since fragmented potential DSFF habitat in the area. Based on results of the December 2015 habitat suitability evaluation, existing conditions present at the site are not consistent with those known or expected to support DSFF. No exposed natural or semi- natural open areas with unconsolidated wind -worked granitic soils or dunes are present. Substrate conditions are not consistent with those most often correlated with potential DSFF habitat and no DSFF plant associations are present on site. Under current conditions, the site would generally be considered prohibitive to DSSF occupation. The underlying soil environment appears to be the most definitive factor of whether an area could potentially support DSFF. Accordingly, the quality of soils present within the study area was rated for its potential to support DSFF. No areas of the site are mapped as Delhi soils; however the substrates present were visually inspected and rated based on a scale of 1 to 5, with 5 being the best quality and most suitable habitat in the biologist's judgment: Soils dominated by heavy deposits of alluvial material including coarse sands and gravels with little or no Delhi sands and evidence of soil compaction. Unsuitable. 2. Delhi sands are present but the soil characteristics include a predominance of alluvial materials (Tujunga Soils). Very Low Quality. 3. Although not clean, sufficient Delhi sands are present to prevent soil compaction. Some sandy soils exposed on the surface due to fossorial animal activity. Low Quality. 4. Abundant clean Delhi sands with little or no alluvial material or Tujunga soils present. Moderate abundance of exposed sands on the soil surface. Low vegetative cover. Evidence of moderate degree of fossorial animal activity by vertebrates and invertebrates. Moderate Quality Rev 3-1-16 P639 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00451 AND DRC2016-00508 Page 34 5. Sand dune habitat with clean Delhi sands. High abundance of exposed sands on the soil surface. Low vegetative cover. Evidence (soil surface often gives under foot) of high degree of fossorial animal activity by vertebrates and invertebrates. High Quality DSSF Conclusion: Based on the above ratings and existing site conditions, the study area would be considered unsuitable for DSFF. In view of correlative habitat analyses from a wide range of occupied DSFF habitats in the region, the subject site does not contain habitat suitable to support or sustain a viable DSFF population. Therefore, no impacts to DSFF are expected and no mitigation is required for less than significant impacts to DSFF under CEQA. SAN BERNARDINO KANGAROO RAT (SBKR) A protocol trapping survey by ENVIRA was performed for the San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat (SBKR). Trapping surveys were conducted on November 12 to 17, 2015. The assessment was required to determine the presence or absence of either Los Angeles Pocket Mouse (LAPM) or SBKR in the alluvial fan drainages and upland habitat located on the property. Field surveys and focused trapping for SBKR were performed by Mr. Philippe Vergne of ENVIRA who holds a U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service permit to trap and handle Stephens's and San Bernardino Kangaroo rats, Pacific Pocket mouse, and to conduct field studies on sensitive small mammals in Southern California (TE -831207- 3), a California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) Memorandum of Understanding for above mentioned species and the Mohave Ground Squirrel, the Los Angeles pocket mouse, Palms Springs pocket mouse, Palm Springs ground squirrel, white -eared pocket mouse, Jacumba pocket mouse, north-western San Diego pocket mouse, and Dulzura pocket mouse, and a CDFG collection permit. Trapping was conducted according to protocols established for small mammal species and used for LAPM and SBKR surveys. The protocol calls for five consecutive nights of trapping, conducted when the animal is active aboveground at night. One five-day trapping session was deemed necessary to cover the project site. A focused trapping survey was conducted from November 12 to 17 of 2015. Trapping grids of 70 traps (7X10 lines) and two lines of 30 traps were set at trapping Areas A through D (Figure 3 of SBKR Report). Traps were placed in suitable habitat areas on the project, concentrating on locating traps in areas containing sandy soils and suitable vegetation. Areas with kangaroo sign were also targeted. Each trap was baited with a mixture of bird seed and rolled oats placed at the back of the traps. The traps were left in place, set at dusk each night and inspected once during the night and at dawn each morning. Several sensitive small mammal species were identified as potentially present in the vicinity of the project. They are the SBKR, the San Diego pocket mouse, the Los Angeles pocket mouse, and the San Diego desert woodrat. Of the animal species potentially present, only the SBKR requires specific survey protocols to establish presence or absence. These specific survey protocols are required for areas where impacts may occur to the sensitive species or their occupied habitat. The remaining species are usually identified through casual observation while trapping for targeted species. The project is not located within USFWS designated critical habitat for SBKR. The past habitat losses and potential future losses prompted the emergency listing of the SBKR as an endangered species (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1998a). The SBKR is also listed as a State Species of Special Concern. Rev 3-1-16 P640 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 5. Sand dune habitat with clean Delhi sands. High abundance of exposed sands on the soil surface. Low vegetative cover. Evidence (soil surface often gives under foot) of high degree of fossorial animal activity by vertebrates and invertebrates. High Quality DSSF Conclusion: Based on the above ratings and existing site conditions, the study area would be considered unsuitable for DSFF. In view of correlative habitat analyses from a wide range of occupied DSFF habitats in the region, the subject site does not contain habitat suitable to support or sustain a viable DSFF population. Therefore, no impacts to DSFF are expected and no mitigation is required for less than significant impacts to DSFF under CEQA. SAN BERNARDINO KANGAROO RAT (SBKR) A protocol trapping survey by ENVIRA was performed for the San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat (SBKR). Trapping surveys were conducted on November 12 to 17, 2015. The assessment was required to determine the presence or absence of either Los Angeles Pocket Mouse (LAPM) or SBKR in the alluvial fan drainages and upland habitat located on the property. Field surveys and focused trapping for SBKR were performed by Mr. Philippe Vergne of ENVIRA who holds a U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service permit to trap and handle Stephens's and San Bernardino Kangaroo rats, Pacific Pocket mouse, and to conduct field studies on sensitive small mammals in Southern California (TE -831207- 3), a California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) Memorandum of Understanding for above mentioned species and the Mohave Ground Squirrel, the Los Angeles pocket mouse, Palms Springs pocket mouse, Palm Springs ground squirrel, white -eared pocket mouse, Jacumba pocket mouse, north-western San Diego pocket mouse, and Dulzura pocket mouse, and a CDFG collection permit. Trapping was conducted according to protocols established for small mammal species and used for LAPM and SBKR surveys. The protocol calls for five consecutive nights of trapping, conducted when the animal is active aboveground at night. One five-day trapping session was deemed necessary to cover the project site. A focused trapping survey was conducted from November 12 to 17 of 2015. Trapping grids of 70 traps (7X10 lines) and two lines of 30 traps were set at trapping Areas A through D (Figure 3 of SBKR Report). Traps were placed in suitable habitat areas on the project, concentrating on locating traps in areas containing sandy soils and suitable vegetation. Areas with kangaroo sign were also targeted. Each trap was baited with a mixture of bird seed and rolled oats placed at the back of the traps. The traps were left in place, set at dusk each night and inspected once during the night and at dawn each morning. Several sensitive small mammal species were identified as potentially present in the vicinity of the project. They are the SBKR, the San Diego pocket mouse, the Los Angeles pocket mouse, and the San Diego desert woodrat. Of the animal species potentially present, only the SBKR requires specific survey protocols to establish presence or absence. These specific survey protocols are required for areas where impacts may occur to the sensitive species or their occupied habitat. The remaining species are usually identified through casual observation while trapping for targeted species. The project is not located within USFWS designated critical habitat for SBKR. The past habitat losses and potential future losses prompted the emergency listing of the SBKR as an endangered species (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1998a). The SBKR is also listed as a State Species of Special Concern. Rev 3-1-16 P640 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00451 AND DRC2016-00508 Page 35 RESULTS FOR SAN BERNARDINO KANGAROO RAT A total of five small mammal species and 40 small mammals were captured for a capture rate of about four percent. Sensitive species that were captured are the San Diego pocket mouse (Chaetodippus fallax fallax), and the San Diego desert woodrat (Neotoma lepida). Trapping Results Pierotti Property TRAPS TRAP SITE NIGHTS DKR Less Than PEER CHFA NELE Grid A Significant Less 9 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No 1 Impact Incorporated Impact Impact RESULTS FOR SAN BERNARDINO KANGAROO RAT A total of five small mammal species and 40 small mammals were captured for a capture rate of about four percent. Sensitive species that were captured are the San Diego pocket mouse (Chaetodippus fallax fallax), and the San Diego desert woodrat (Neotoma lepida). Trapping Results Pierotti Property TRAPS TRAP SITE NIGHTS DKR PEMA PEER CHFA NELE Grid A 350 2 9 2 3 Grid B 350 1 12 2 Line C 150 4 1 Line D 150 3 1 TOTAL 1000 3 28 2 6 1 DKR-Dulzura Kangaroo Rat (Dipodomys simulans) PEMA-Deer Mouse (Permnyscus maniculatis) REME-Harvest Mouse (Reithrodontomys megalotis) CHFA-Northwestern San Diego Pocket Mouse (Chaetodipus fallax fallax) NELE- San Diego desert woodrat (Neotoma lepida) No Los Angeles pocket mice nor San Bernardino kangaroo rats were caught during the trapping surveys. A total of five small mammal species were captured. Sensitive species that were captured are the San Diego pocket mouse (Chaetodippus fallax fallax), and one San Diego desert woodrat (Neotoma lepida intermedia). The kangaroo rat species on site is the Dulzura kangaroo rat (Dipodomys simulans). The two remaining species observed onsite were the deer mouse (Peromyscus maniculatis) and harvest mouse (Reithrodontomys megalotis). No listed small mammals were detected during the trapping study, including the San Bernardino kangaroo rat (SBKR) and the Stephens' kangaroo rat (SKR), and so both are considered absent from the site. Project impacts were only generally assessed in relation to LAPM and SBKR. The proposed project is not located within designated critical habitat for the SBKR management area 4. Therefore, no impacts to LAPM or SBKR are expected and no mitigation is required. PEER REVIEW OF BIOLOGICAL REPORTS All four Biological reports (Biological Technical Resources, Gnatcatcher, Delhi Sands Flower Loving Fly and San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat) were peer reviewed by Michael Baker International. Rev 3-1-16 P641 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00451 AND DRC2016-00508 Page 36 Biological Resources Report/Vegetation Communities and Gnatcatcher The peer review is in agreement with the assessment of the site for special status plants and animals, and the Gnatcatcher. Regarding vegetation communities, the peer review indicates the following: "Although in agreement with the discussion of the channelization of Day Creek resulting in only remnant indicators of a Riversidean Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub (RAFSS) community, large patches of Coastal Sage Scrub (CSS) were observed in the northwestern portion of the project site that are primarily dominated by a CSS species, California sagebrush (Artemisia californica). The remainder of relatively intact habitat on-site is adequately described as Buckwheat Scrub, which often follows disturbances, such as in this case, rather than 'an earlier stage of ecological succession" of RAFSS where the length of isolation is extensive."' In response to the peer review comments, GLA prepared a follow-up response and Technical Memorandum (Appendix P) that states the following: "GLA's Biological Technical Report noted the presence of California sagebrush throughout the site; however, as indicated in the Response to Peer Review Comments, GLA chose to map the relatively smaller patches of sagebrush with the overall buckwheat scrub, since both are components of CSS, and combining the sagebrush patches with the buckwheat scrub mapping did not affect the accuracy or findings of the Biological Technical Report." Delhi Sands Flower Lovinq Fly The peer review concurs with the DSS Habitat Suitability Evaluation and states that "the project site does not support suitable Delhi Sands Flower -loving Fly (DSF) habitat and DSF would not occur on the site." The peer review also suggests including a map of the Ontario DSF Recovery Unit, noting that the project site is north of the Ontario Recovery Unit, outside of the designated DSF Sands, and wind patterns are from the north, which would not carry DSF Sands to the site." In response to the peer review, the DSF Report was revised to incorporate the peer reviews comments. San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat The peer review concurs that "the project site is not currently occupied by Los Angeles pocket mouse nor San Bernardino kangaroo rat based on the results of the five night presence/absence trapping study." However, the peer reviews adds that the presence of "two sensitive species (i.e., San Diego pocket mouse and San Diego desert woodrat) would require coordination with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife for impacts to these two sensitive species under CEQA." In response to the peer review, the SBKR Report was revised with the following addition: "Project impacts to these species must be evaluated under CEQA, but since such impacts would be less than significant and would not require mitigation, coordination with CDFW is not required for the project." CONCLUSION: Based on the trap results, the property is not currently occupied by LAPM nor SBKR. There will be no direct impacts to SBKR from project implementation. Two sensitive species, the north western San Diego pocket mouse and the San Diego desert woodrat, were captured on site. The take for this species is not considered as significant under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) considering the trace/low occupancy on site and extant of the species regional distribution, small size and isolation of site, and the relatively low sensitivity of these species, the loss of habitat Rev 3-1-16 P642 ss Than gnificant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: Pp g Potentially Significant With itigation [Incorporated Than Significant No Impact Impact Impact Biological Resources Report/Vegetation Communities and Gnatcatcher The peer review is in agreement with the assessment of the site for special status plants and animals, and the Gnatcatcher. Regarding vegetation communities, the peer review indicates the following: "Although in agreement with the discussion of the channelization of Day Creek resulting in only remnant indicators of a Riversidean Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub (RAFSS) community, large patches of Coastal Sage Scrub (CSS) were observed in the northwestern portion of the project site that are primarily dominated by a CSS species, California sagebrush (Artemisia californica). The remainder of relatively intact habitat on-site is adequately described as Buckwheat Scrub, which often follows disturbances, such as in this case, rather than 'an earlier stage of ecological succession" of RAFSS where the length of isolation is extensive."' In response to the peer review comments, GLA prepared a follow-up response and Technical Memorandum (Appendix P) that states the following: "GLA's Biological Technical Report noted the presence of California sagebrush throughout the site; however, as indicated in the Response to Peer Review Comments, GLA chose to map the relatively smaller patches of sagebrush with the overall buckwheat scrub, since both are components of CSS, and combining the sagebrush patches with the buckwheat scrub mapping did not affect the accuracy or findings of the Biological Technical Report." Delhi Sands Flower Lovinq Fly The peer review concurs with the DSS Habitat Suitability Evaluation and states that "the project site does not support suitable Delhi Sands Flower -loving Fly (DSF) habitat and DSF would not occur on the site." The peer review also suggests including a map of the Ontario DSF Recovery Unit, noting that the project site is north of the Ontario Recovery Unit, outside of the designated DSF Sands, and wind patterns are from the north, which would not carry DSF Sands to the site." In response to the peer review, the DSF Report was revised to incorporate the peer reviews comments. San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat The peer review concurs that "the project site is not currently occupied by Los Angeles pocket mouse nor San Bernardino kangaroo rat based on the results of the five night presence/absence trapping study." However, the peer reviews adds that the presence of "two sensitive species (i.e., San Diego pocket mouse and San Diego desert woodrat) would require coordination with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife for impacts to these two sensitive species under CEQA." In response to the peer review, the SBKR Report was revised with the following addition: "Project impacts to these species must be evaluated under CEQA, but since such impacts would be less than significant and would not require mitigation, coordination with CDFW is not required for the project." CONCLUSION: Based on the trap results, the property is not currently occupied by LAPM nor SBKR. There will be no direct impacts to SBKR from project implementation. Two sensitive species, the north western San Diego pocket mouse and the San Diego desert woodrat, were captured on site. The take for this species is not considered as significant under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) considering the trace/low occupancy on site and extant of the species regional distribution, small size and isolation of site, and the relatively low sensitivity of these species, the loss of habitat Rev 3-1-16 P642 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00451 AND DRC2016-00508 Page 37 would not have a substantial, adverse effect. Therefore, the impacts would be less than significant and would not require mitigation. In order to avoid impacts to Burrowing Owls and nesting birds, the following mitigation measures are required and will reduce impacts to less than significant: 1) Three days prior to the removal of vegetation or ground -disturbing activities, a breeding bird survey that is in conformance with the Migratory Bird Treaty Act shall be required to determine whether nesting is occurring. Occupied nests shall not be disturbed unless a qualified biologist verifies through non- invasive methods that either (a) the adult birds have not begun egg -laying or incubation; or (b) the juveniles from the occupied nests are foraging independently and are capable of independent survival. If the biologist is unable to verify one of the above conditions, then no disturbance shall occur within 300 feet of non -raptor nests, and within 500 feet of raptor nests, during the breeding season to avoid abandonment of young. If nests are discovered, they shall be avoided through the establishment of an appropriate buffer setback, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. The temporary "no construction" area shall be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and have left the nest, construction in the area may resume. Perform a Burrowing Owl Survey that is in conformance with the Department of Fish and Wildlife Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation and submit the written report outlining the findings to the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) and the Planning Department within 30 days of groundbreaking activity. The survey shall include a habitat assessment, survey and impact analysis. The Burrowing Owl Survey shall follow the following protocol: Burrowing Owl Survey methodology shall be based on Appendix D (Breeding and Non -breeding Season Surveys and Reports) of the CDFW Staff Report. Results of the pre -construction survey shall be provided to CDFW and the City. If the pre -construction survey does not identify burrowing owls on the project site, then no further mitigation is required. If burrowing owls are found to be utilizing the project site during the pre - construction survey, measures shall be developed by the qualified biologist in coordination with CDFW to avoid Impacting occupied burrows during the nesting period. These measures shall be based on the most current CDFW protocols and will at minimum include establishment of buffer setbacks from occupied burrows and owl monitoring. If ground -disturbing activities are delayed or suspended for more than 30 days after the pre -construction survey, the site shall be resurveyed for owls. During the non -breeding season from September 1 through January 31, if burrows are occupied by migratory or non -migratory resident burrowing Rev 3-1-16 P643 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: pp g Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impart would not have a substantial, adverse effect. Therefore, the impacts would be less than significant and would not require mitigation. In order to avoid impacts to Burrowing Owls and nesting birds, the following mitigation measures are required and will reduce impacts to less than significant: 1) Three days prior to the removal of vegetation or ground -disturbing activities, a breeding bird survey that is in conformance with the Migratory Bird Treaty Act shall be required to determine whether nesting is occurring. Occupied nests shall not be disturbed unless a qualified biologist verifies through non- invasive methods that either (a) the adult birds have not begun egg -laying or incubation; or (b) the juveniles from the occupied nests are foraging independently and are capable of independent survival. If the biologist is unable to verify one of the above conditions, then no disturbance shall occur within 300 feet of non -raptor nests, and within 500 feet of raptor nests, during the breeding season to avoid abandonment of young. If nests are discovered, they shall be avoided through the establishment of an appropriate buffer setback, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. The temporary "no construction" area shall be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and have left the nest, construction in the area may resume. Perform a Burrowing Owl Survey that is in conformance with the Department of Fish and Wildlife Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation and submit the written report outlining the findings to the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) and the Planning Department within 30 days of groundbreaking activity. The survey shall include a habitat assessment, survey and impact analysis. The Burrowing Owl Survey shall follow the following protocol: Burrowing Owl Survey methodology shall be based on Appendix D (Breeding and Non -breeding Season Surveys and Reports) of the CDFW Staff Report. Results of the pre -construction survey shall be provided to CDFW and the City. If the pre -construction survey does not identify burrowing owls on the project site, then no further mitigation is required. If burrowing owls are found to be utilizing the project site during the pre - construction survey, measures shall be developed by the qualified biologist in coordination with CDFW to avoid Impacting occupied burrows during the nesting period. These measures shall be based on the most current CDFW protocols and will at minimum include establishment of buffer setbacks from occupied burrows and owl monitoring. If ground -disturbing activities are delayed or suspended for more than 30 days after the pre -construction survey, the site shall be resurveyed for owls. During the non -breeding season from September 1 through January 31, if burrows are occupied by migratory or non -migratory resident burrowing Rev 3-1-16 P643 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00451 AND DRC2016-00508 Page 38 owls during a pre -construction survey, burrow exclusion and/or closure may be used to exclude owls from those burrows. Burrow exclusion and/or closure should only be conducted by a qualified wildlife biologist in coordination with CDFW using the most current CDFW guidelines. During the avian nesting season from February 1 through August 31, if nests are discovered, they shall be avoided through establishment of an appropriate buffer setback, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. The temporary "no construction" area would have to be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and have left the nest, construction in the area may resume. b) A Biological Technical Report was completed for the project site by Glenn Lukos Associates (GLA; April 21, 2017). The Biological Resources Assessment Survey (April 21, 2017) concluded that the project site did not include riparian habitat; therefore the project will not have any impacts on riparian habitat. IMPACTS TO VEGETATION COMMUNIITIES Nearly the entire Project site (approximately 25.48 acres) supports a scrub vegetation community dominated by California buckwheat, with the remainder of the site (2.96 acres) being disturbed or developed (Exhibit 5 — Vegetation Map of GLA Report). Additional species within the scrub habitat include coastal sagebrush, goldenbush, deerweed, white sage (Salvia apiana), groundsel, and several mature individuals of scalebroom. The property is located in an area that was historically a part of a large alluvial floodplain associated with Day Creek and the Etiwanda Fan. The vegetation at the property is an outlying remnant of a broader alluvial scrub, or more specifically, Riversidean Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub (RAFSS) vegetation community associated with alluvial. In general, alluvial scrub consists of a community located on the outwash fans of large canyons within the San Gabriel, San Bernardino, and San Jacinto Mountains, as well as other smaller riverine areas in Southern California. Alluvial scrub is located on the floodplain terraces of the larger rivers and streams associated with the alluvial fans. Alluvial scrub is made up predominantly of drought -deciduous shrubs typical of coastal sage scrub communities, but also with a significant cover of larger shrubs typically found in chaparral communities. RAFSS specifically has a coastal sage scrub component where the shrubs species are characteristic of Riversidean sage scrub, which is an inland expression of coastal sage scrub. The only dominant species that has a strong fidelity to alluvial scrub is scalebroom, which generally is regarded as an indicator of RAFSS. The subject property contains several mature individuals of scalebroom. In an alluvial system that has not been modified by flood control and development, the terraces are characteristically subjected to infrequent, but severe flood events that scour the surface, thereby removing the vegetation present and restoring the surface to an earlier stage of ecological succession. Following these large flood events, vegetation re- establishes on the scoured surface and over time the community progresses through various stages of ecological succession until the next flood event again re -scours the surface. Earlier stages of RAFSS are characterized by a dominance of species such as scalebroom and California buckwheat, but without the presence of larger evergreen shrubs and abundant annual grasses. Whereas California buckwheat is a general Rev 3-1-16 P644 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact owls during a pre -construction survey, burrow exclusion and/or closure may be used to exclude owls from those burrows. Burrow exclusion and/or closure should only be conducted by a qualified wildlife biologist in coordination with CDFW using the most current CDFW guidelines. During the avian nesting season from February 1 through August 31, if nests are discovered, they shall be avoided through establishment of an appropriate buffer setback, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. The temporary "no construction" area would have to be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and have left the nest, construction in the area may resume. b) A Biological Technical Report was completed for the project site by Glenn Lukos Associates (GLA; April 21, 2017). The Biological Resources Assessment Survey (April 21, 2017) concluded that the project site did not include riparian habitat; therefore the project will not have any impacts on riparian habitat. IMPACTS TO VEGETATION COMMUNIITIES Nearly the entire Project site (approximately 25.48 acres) supports a scrub vegetation community dominated by California buckwheat, with the remainder of the site (2.96 acres) being disturbed or developed (Exhibit 5 — Vegetation Map of GLA Report). Additional species within the scrub habitat include coastal sagebrush, goldenbush, deerweed, white sage (Salvia apiana), groundsel, and several mature individuals of scalebroom. The property is located in an area that was historically a part of a large alluvial floodplain associated with Day Creek and the Etiwanda Fan. The vegetation at the property is an outlying remnant of a broader alluvial scrub, or more specifically, Riversidean Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub (RAFSS) vegetation community associated with alluvial. In general, alluvial scrub consists of a community located on the outwash fans of large canyons within the San Gabriel, San Bernardino, and San Jacinto Mountains, as well as other smaller riverine areas in Southern California. Alluvial scrub is located on the floodplain terraces of the larger rivers and streams associated with the alluvial fans. Alluvial scrub is made up predominantly of drought -deciduous shrubs typical of coastal sage scrub communities, but also with a significant cover of larger shrubs typically found in chaparral communities. RAFSS specifically has a coastal sage scrub component where the shrubs species are characteristic of Riversidean sage scrub, which is an inland expression of coastal sage scrub. The only dominant species that has a strong fidelity to alluvial scrub is scalebroom, which generally is regarded as an indicator of RAFSS. The subject property contains several mature individuals of scalebroom. In an alluvial system that has not been modified by flood control and development, the terraces are characteristically subjected to infrequent, but severe flood events that scour the surface, thereby removing the vegetation present and restoring the surface to an earlier stage of ecological succession. Following these large flood events, vegetation re- establishes on the scoured surface and over time the community progresses through various stages of ecological succession until the next flood event again re -scours the surface. Earlier stages of RAFSS are characterized by a dominance of species such as scalebroom and California buckwheat, but without the presence of larger evergreen shrubs and abundant annual grasses. Whereas California buckwheat is a general Rev 3-1-16 P644 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00451 AND DRC2016-00508 age 39 indicator of coastal sage scrub communities, including Riversidean sage scrub, scale broom is exclusively an indicator species of early-stage RAFSS, i.e., a RAFSS community whose alluvial surface was more recently affected by flood scour. In contrast, shrubs such as chamise and holly -leaved cherry (Prunus ilicifolia) are found in later -stage RAFSS, i.e., a community whose alluvial surface has not been affected by flood scour for some time. According to the Biological Technical Report, it is an important distinction that the existing habitat at the subject property is a remnant of what the site historically supported, and that flood control improvements to Day Creek and the overall alluvial system has modified the flood regime of the area, thereby eliminating the possibility of large-scale flooding necessary to naturally sustain a functional alluvial scrub community at the property. Furthermore, the property has been disturbed in the past, including numerous areas where the surface has been scraped by equipment. The dominance of California buckwheat, which as noted above is an indicator species of early-stage RAFSS, suggests that the onsite habitat has been disturbed repeatedly over the years such that what remains has the artificial appearance of early-stage RAFSS. Since the site would no longer be subjected to the same flooding that historically created the alluvial terraces, the remnant patches of scrub vegetation that do remain onsite no longer represent a naturally sustaining RAFSS community. Instead, what remains onsite essentially functions as Riversidean sage scrub dominated by California buckwheat, i.e., California buckwheat scrub. Furthermore, the remaining habitat does not have long-term conservation value as RAFSS due to the modification of the flood regime, and the spatial isolation of the site from the historic RAFSS community. Although RAFSS is State -designated as a S-1.1 (very threatened) community, the loss of California buckwheat -dominated Riversidean sage scrub (non-functional remnants of historic RAFSS) would not be considered as a "substantial adverse effect" on a sensitive natural community, i.e. not on the remaining locations of functional RAFSS as a whole. The Project will result in the loss of approximately 25.48 acres of scrub vegetation that is a functionally isolated remnant of a historically broader extent of alluvial scrub vegetation, namely RAFSS, associated with the Etiwanda Fan and the Day Creek wash. However, residential/commercial development and flood control improvements over time have eliminated the majority of the alluvial scrub vegetation south of the 210 Freeway (as well as north of the Freeway), leaving only scattered remnant patches along the Day Creek Channel and in a few other locations. These patches of scrub vegetation are detached from the remaining Etiwanda Fan located north of the 210 Freeway, and are no longer subject to the alluvial processes that both created the habitat, and that are necessary to sustain the habitat in the future. The habitat at the Project site has been disturbed over the years, such that the site is dominated by California buckwheat, giving the site the appearance of alluvial scrub vegetation in an earlier stage of ecological succession. However, due to the extent of development and flood control improvements, the Project site is functionally isolated from the degree of flood scour that would be necessary to naturally sustain characteristic RAFSS habitat in the future. Furthermore, the site is not occupied by any listed species known in association with alluvial scrub habitats, including the coastal California gnatcatcher and the San Bernardino kangaroo rat, and listed plants such as the Santa Ana River woolly star and the slender horned spineflower. Although the site has some potential for future use by the gnatcatcher, the isolation of the site eliminates the Rev 3-1-16 P645 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: pp g Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact impact indicator of coastal sage scrub communities, including Riversidean sage scrub, scale broom is exclusively an indicator species of early-stage RAFSS, i.e., a RAFSS community whose alluvial surface was more recently affected by flood scour. In contrast, shrubs such as chamise and holly -leaved cherry (Prunus ilicifolia) are found in later -stage RAFSS, i.e., a community whose alluvial surface has not been affected by flood scour for some time. According to the Biological Technical Report, it is an important distinction that the existing habitat at the subject property is a remnant of what the site historically supported, and that flood control improvements to Day Creek and the overall alluvial system has modified the flood regime of the area, thereby eliminating the possibility of large-scale flooding necessary to naturally sustain a functional alluvial scrub community at the property. Furthermore, the property has been disturbed in the past, including numerous areas where the surface has been scraped by equipment. The dominance of California buckwheat, which as noted above is an indicator species of early-stage RAFSS, suggests that the onsite habitat has been disturbed repeatedly over the years such that what remains has the artificial appearance of early-stage RAFSS. Since the site would no longer be subjected to the same flooding that historically created the alluvial terraces, the remnant patches of scrub vegetation that do remain onsite no longer represent a naturally sustaining RAFSS community. Instead, what remains onsite essentially functions as Riversidean sage scrub dominated by California buckwheat, i.e., California buckwheat scrub. Furthermore, the remaining habitat does not have long-term conservation value as RAFSS due to the modification of the flood regime, and the spatial isolation of the site from the historic RAFSS community. Although RAFSS is State -designated as a S-1.1 (very threatened) community, the loss of California buckwheat -dominated Riversidean sage scrub (non-functional remnants of historic RAFSS) would not be considered as a "substantial adverse effect" on a sensitive natural community, i.e. not on the remaining locations of functional RAFSS as a whole. The Project will result in the loss of approximately 25.48 acres of scrub vegetation that is a functionally isolated remnant of a historically broader extent of alluvial scrub vegetation, namely RAFSS, associated with the Etiwanda Fan and the Day Creek wash. However, residential/commercial development and flood control improvements over time have eliminated the majority of the alluvial scrub vegetation south of the 210 Freeway (as well as north of the Freeway), leaving only scattered remnant patches along the Day Creek Channel and in a few other locations. These patches of scrub vegetation are detached from the remaining Etiwanda Fan located north of the 210 Freeway, and are no longer subject to the alluvial processes that both created the habitat, and that are necessary to sustain the habitat in the future. The habitat at the Project site has been disturbed over the years, such that the site is dominated by California buckwheat, giving the site the appearance of alluvial scrub vegetation in an earlier stage of ecological succession. However, due to the extent of development and flood control improvements, the Project site is functionally isolated from the degree of flood scour that would be necessary to naturally sustain characteristic RAFSS habitat in the future. Furthermore, the site is not occupied by any listed species known in association with alluvial scrub habitats, including the coastal California gnatcatcher and the San Bernardino kangaroo rat, and listed plants such as the Santa Ana River woolly star and the slender horned spineflower. Although the site has some potential for future use by the gnatcatcher, the isolation of the site eliminates the Rev 3-1-16 P645 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00451 AND DRC2016-00508 Page 40 possibility for the future occupation by SBKR, and the establishment of rare plants that are currently absent from the site, and in the case of the woolly star and spineflower, rely on periodic flooding to maintain suitable habitat conditions for these species. As a result, the scrub vegetation at the site does not have long-term conservation value as RAFSS, and the loss of vegetation at the site would not have a substantial adverse effect on remaining functional RAFSS associated with the Etiwanda Fan, Lytle Creek, Santa Ana River floodplain and elsewhere in the region. See also Peer Review of Biological Reports above under a) for additional discussion. Based upon the above analysis, impacts would be less than significant and would not require mitigation. Riparian impacts: The Biological Resources Assessment Survey (April 21, 2017 by GLA Associates) concluded that the project site did not include any water features that would be considered jurisdictional waters or streambeds by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Regional Board, waters protected under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, or streams subject to the jurisdiction of the California Department of Fish and Wildlife. Cumulative Impacts: The proposed Project will contribute to the cumulative impacts associated with alluvial scrub vegetation, including the associated species noted to occur or potentially occur at the site. However, due to the relatively small size of the property, functional isolation of the site, and the lack of listed species and other species of higher sensitivity, the cumulative impacts would be less than significant. C) No wetland habitat is present on-site. The Biological Resources Assessment Survey (August 19, 2016 by GLA Associates) concluded that the project site did not include any water features that would be considered jurisdictional waters or streambeds by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Regional Board, waters protected under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, or streams subject to the jurisdiction of the California Department of Fish and Wildlife. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The City is primarily located in a suburban area that does not contain large, contiguous natural open space areas. Wildlife potentially may move through the north/south trending tributaries in the northern portion of the City and within the Sphere of Influence. The Project site provides local wildlife use, but is not part of a regional wildlife corridor, and therefore, the Project will not adversely affect wildlife movement. e) There are two trees on the project site. Accordingly, an arboricultural report was prepared (LSA Associates; May 2, 2016). The author of the report is biologist Julie McNamara (ISA Certified Arborist/Certified Tree Risk Assessor WE -11439A). The arborist evaluated the trees and inventoried the following attributes for each tree: GPS location, species, diameter at breast height (54 inches above grade), rating (0-5, 0 indicates a dead tree and 5 indicates excellent health and structure). Both trees represent the Eucalyptus species, Eucalyptus polyanthemos (Silver Dollar Gum) and Eucalyptus rubis (Flooded Gum). The Silver Dollar Gum does have some conditions indicative of the structural failure profile, including extended branches and a leaning trunk. The Flooded Gum is in poor condition overall, with poor structure, longitudinal cracks and extended branches. Both Eucalyptus trees showed signs of two pests (psyllids and Eucalyptus tortoise beetles); however, the damage was not major on either tree. Both trees were given an overall rating of 2, indicating poor health. The low ratings were due to the poor structures of the tree. In order to qualify as Heritage trees Rev 3-1-16 P646 Less Than Significant Less and Supporting Information Sources: PotentiallyWith Significant Mitigation ThanIssues Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Im act possibility for the future occupation by SBKR, and the establishment of rare plants that are currently absent from the site, and in the case of the woolly star and spineflower, rely on periodic flooding to maintain suitable habitat conditions for these species. As a result, the scrub vegetation at the site does not have long-term conservation value as RAFSS, and the loss of vegetation at the site would not have a substantial adverse effect on remaining functional RAFSS associated with the Etiwanda Fan, Lytle Creek, Santa Ana River floodplain and elsewhere in the region. See also Peer Review of Biological Reports above under a) for additional discussion. Based upon the above analysis, impacts would be less than significant and would not require mitigation. Riparian impacts: The Biological Resources Assessment Survey (April 21, 2017 by GLA Associates) concluded that the project site did not include any water features that would be considered jurisdictional waters or streambeds by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Regional Board, waters protected under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, or streams subject to the jurisdiction of the California Department of Fish and Wildlife. Cumulative Impacts: The proposed Project will contribute to the cumulative impacts associated with alluvial scrub vegetation, including the associated species noted to occur or potentially occur at the site. However, due to the relatively small size of the property, functional isolation of the site, and the lack of listed species and other species of higher sensitivity, the cumulative impacts would be less than significant. C) No wetland habitat is present on-site. The Biological Resources Assessment Survey (August 19, 2016 by GLA Associates) concluded that the project site did not include any water features that would be considered jurisdictional waters or streambeds by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Regional Board, waters protected under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, or streams subject to the jurisdiction of the California Department of Fish and Wildlife. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The City is primarily located in a suburban area that does not contain large, contiguous natural open space areas. Wildlife potentially may move through the north/south trending tributaries in the northern portion of the City and within the Sphere of Influence. The Project site provides local wildlife use, but is not part of a regional wildlife corridor, and therefore, the Project will not adversely affect wildlife movement. e) There are two trees on the project site. Accordingly, an arboricultural report was prepared (LSA Associates; May 2, 2016). The author of the report is biologist Julie McNamara (ISA Certified Arborist/Certified Tree Risk Assessor WE -11439A). The arborist evaluated the trees and inventoried the following attributes for each tree: GPS location, species, diameter at breast height (54 inches above grade), rating (0-5, 0 indicates a dead tree and 5 indicates excellent health and structure). Both trees represent the Eucalyptus species, Eucalyptus polyanthemos (Silver Dollar Gum) and Eucalyptus rubis (Flooded Gum). The Silver Dollar Gum does have some conditions indicative of the structural failure profile, including extended branches and a leaning trunk. The Flooded Gum is in poor condition overall, with poor structure, longitudinal cracks and extended branches. Both Eucalyptus trees showed signs of two pests (psyllids and Eucalyptus tortoise beetles); however, the damage was not major on either tree. Both trees were given an overall rating of 2, indicating poor health. The low ratings were due to the poor structures of the tree. In order to qualify as Heritage trees Rev 3-1-16 P646 P647 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00451 AND DRC2016-00508 Page 41 under the City's Ordinance, the trees would have to meet one or more of the following criteria: • All Eucalyptus windrows; • Any tree in excess 30 feet in height and having a single trunk diameter at breast height of 20 inches or more as measured from 4.5 feet above ground; • Multi -trunk trees having a total diameter breast height of 30 inches or more as measured from 4.5 feet above ground; • A stand of trees the nature of which makes each dependent upon the others for survival; • Any other tree as may deemed historically or culturally significant by the Planning Director because of age, size, condition location or aesthetic qualities. Neither tree is part of a Eucalyptus windrow, and both trees are multi -trunked. The Silver Dollar Gum has total diameter at breast height of 22 inches, and the Flooded Gum has a total diameter at breast height of 25 inches. Since both trees are isolated, neither tree is part of a stand of trees that are significant or dependent on each other, and neither tree has characteristics that deem it historically or culturally significant as the trees are isolated, in poor overall health and do not represent a rare or perfect arboreal specimen. Since the two, multi -trunked trees do not qualify as Heritage trees under the multi -trunked threshold, as they total diameter height for each tree is less than 30 inches, a Tree Removal Permit is not required prior to removal. No impacts are anticipated from the removal of the two trees as the project will be planted with several hundred trees according to the landscape plan. f) Neither the City nor the SOI are within an adopted HCP, NCCP, or other approved State Habitat Conservation Plan area. The project site is not located within a local conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Figure RC -1. No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur. 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project. Less Than a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () Significant Less ( ) Issues and Supporting Information Sources: pp g Potentiallyignifa Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No § 15064.5? Impact Incorporated Impact Impact under the City's Ordinance, the trees would have to meet one or more of the following criteria: • All Eucalyptus windrows; • Any tree in excess 30 feet in height and having a single trunk diameter at breast height of 20 inches or more as measured from 4.5 feet above ground; • Multi -trunk trees having a total diameter breast height of 30 inches or more as measured from 4.5 feet above ground; • A stand of trees the nature of which makes each dependent upon the others for survival; • Any other tree as may deemed historically or culturally significant by the Planning Director because of age, size, condition location or aesthetic qualities. Neither tree is part of a Eucalyptus windrow, and both trees are multi -trunked. The Silver Dollar Gum has total diameter at breast height of 22 inches, and the Flooded Gum has a total diameter at breast height of 25 inches. Since both trees are isolated, neither tree is part of a stand of trees that are significant or dependent on each other, and neither tree has characteristics that deem it historically or culturally significant as the trees are isolated, in poor overall health and do not represent a rare or perfect arboreal specimen. Since the two, multi -trunked trees do not qualify as Heritage trees under the multi -trunked threshold, as they total diameter height for each tree is less than 30 inches, a Tree Removal Permit is not required prior to removal. No impacts are anticipated from the removal of the two trees as the project will be planted with several hundred trees according to the landscape plan. f) Neither the City nor the SOI are within an adopted HCP, NCCP, or other approved State Habitat Conservation Plan area. The project site is not located within a local conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Figure RC -1. No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur. 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project. a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () (✓) () ( ) significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () (✓) () ( ) significance of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5? C) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological () (✓) () ( ) resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred () () () (✓) outside of dedicated cemeteries? Rev 3-1-16 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00451 AND DRC2016-00508 Page 42 Comments: a) The project site has not been identified as a "Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2.24 (Historic Preservation). A Cultural Resources Assessment was performed on the project site by LSA Associates (May 2, 2016). In conjunction with the South Central Coastal Information Center at California State University, Fullerton, the California Historical Resources Information was also consulted. A total of 24 resources were identified within a 1 mile search of the project site. Literature and aerial photographs were also reviewed. The study also included an intensive field survey of the project site. Parallel, linear transects separated by approximately 20-30 feet were conducted over the project site. Aerial photographs suggest project was once covered in vineyards. No historic aerial photographs or maps depict any buildings or structures in the project area at any time. No cultural resource sites were observed in the project area during the pedestrian survey. The project site is somewhat disturbed by prior bulldozing and dumping of construction material. The study concludes with the absence of cultural resources in the current project area and surrounding vicinity, no additional cultural work is recommended. The study does recommend that in the event that previously undocumented archaeological resources are identified during earthmoving activities, further work in the area should be halted until a professional archaeologist can assess the nature and significance of the finding can be determined. With the mitigation measure included under b) below, any impacts on historic resources will be less than significant. b) A Cultural Resources Assessment was performed on the project site by LSA Associates (May 2, 2016). In conjunction with the South Central Coastal Information Center at California State University, Fullerton, the California Historical Resources Information was also consulted. A total of 24 resources were identified within a 1 mile search of the project site. Literature and aerial photographs were also reviewed. The study also included an intensive field survey of the project site. Parallel, linear transects separated by approximately 20-30 feet were conducted over the project site. Aerial photographs suggest project was once covered in vineyards. No historic aerial photographs or maps depict any buildings or structures in the project area at any time. No cultural resource sites were observed in the project area during the pedestrian survey. The project site is somewhat disturbed by prior bulldozing and dumping of construction material. The study concludes with the absence of cultural resources in the current project area and surrounding vicinity, no additional cultural work is recommended. The study does recommend that in the event that previously undocumented archaeological resources are identified during earthmoving activities, further work in the area should be halted until a professional archaeologist can assess the nature and significance of the finding can be determined. According to the 2010 General Plan, there are no known archaeological sites or resources recorded on the project site; however, the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.6). Construction activity, particularly grading, soil excavation, and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of Cultural Resources based on the future build out of the City. The following mitigation measures as identified in the FPEIR shall be implemented: Rev 3-1-16 P648 Less Than Significant Less and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation ThanIssues Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Comments: a) The project site has not been identified as a "Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2.24 (Historic Preservation). A Cultural Resources Assessment was performed on the project site by LSA Associates (May 2, 2016). In conjunction with the South Central Coastal Information Center at California State University, Fullerton, the California Historical Resources Information was also consulted. A total of 24 resources were identified within a 1 mile search of the project site. Literature and aerial photographs were also reviewed. The study also included an intensive field survey of the project site. Parallel, linear transects separated by approximately 20-30 feet were conducted over the project site. Aerial photographs suggest project was once covered in vineyards. No historic aerial photographs or maps depict any buildings or structures in the project area at any time. No cultural resource sites were observed in the project area during the pedestrian survey. The project site is somewhat disturbed by prior bulldozing and dumping of construction material. The study concludes with the absence of cultural resources in the current project area and surrounding vicinity, no additional cultural work is recommended. The study does recommend that in the event that previously undocumented archaeological resources are identified during earthmoving activities, further work in the area should be halted until a professional archaeologist can assess the nature and significance of the finding can be determined. With the mitigation measure included under b) below, any impacts on historic resources will be less than significant. b) A Cultural Resources Assessment was performed on the project site by LSA Associates (May 2, 2016). In conjunction with the South Central Coastal Information Center at California State University, Fullerton, the California Historical Resources Information was also consulted. A total of 24 resources were identified within a 1 mile search of the project site. Literature and aerial photographs were also reviewed. The study also included an intensive field survey of the project site. Parallel, linear transects separated by approximately 20-30 feet were conducted over the project site. Aerial photographs suggest project was once covered in vineyards. No historic aerial photographs or maps depict any buildings or structures in the project area at any time. No cultural resource sites were observed in the project area during the pedestrian survey. The project site is somewhat disturbed by prior bulldozing and dumping of construction material. The study concludes with the absence of cultural resources in the current project area and surrounding vicinity, no additional cultural work is recommended. The study does recommend that in the event that previously undocumented archaeological resources are identified during earthmoving activities, further work in the area should be halted until a professional archaeologist can assess the nature and significance of the finding can be determined. According to the 2010 General Plan, there are no known archaeological sites or resources recorded on the project site; however, the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.6). Construction activity, particularly grading, soil excavation, and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of Cultural Resources based on the future build out of the City. The following mitigation measures as identified in the FPEIR shall be implemented: Rev 3-1-16 P648 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00451 AND DRC2016-00508 age 43 If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. • Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with Section 21083.2 Archaeological resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, including but not limited to, avoiding archaeological sites, capping or covering sites with soil, planning the site as a park or green space or paying an in-kind mitigation fee. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. C) Per the project's civil engineer, since the project site involves a large area of approximately 25 acres and will require grading to reach 8 feet below existing grade, a paleontological report was prepared (LSA Associates; May 2016). The report includes a locality search locality search at the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, an examination of geologic maps and paleontological literature, and a field survey. No significant paleontological resources were identified in directly within the project area during the locality search or field survey. The results of the locality search and literature review indicate that the project area contains Very Young Alluvial Fan Deposits, which have no paleontological sensitivity. In addition, Pleistocene deposits, which have a high paleontological sensitivity, likely exist at depths beneath these Holocene deposits, possibly as shallow as 20 ft. below the current surface. However, because excavation is not expected to reach these Pleistocene deposits, development of this project is not expected to impact significant paleontological resources. On a broader level, the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.6) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan. According to the research performed at the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County and the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the Sphere -of -Influence, including the project site; however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources. The older alluvium, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last "Ice Age" and the Rev 3-1-16 P649 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PP g Potentiallyignifa Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. • Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with Section 21083.2 Archaeological resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, including but not limited to, avoiding archaeological sites, capping or covering sites with soil, planning the site as a park or green space or paying an in-kind mitigation fee. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. C) Per the project's civil engineer, since the project site involves a large area of approximately 25 acres and will require grading to reach 8 feet below existing grade, a paleontological report was prepared (LSA Associates; May 2016). The report includes a locality search locality search at the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, an examination of geologic maps and paleontological literature, and a field survey. No significant paleontological resources were identified in directly within the project area during the locality search or field survey. The results of the locality search and literature review indicate that the project area contains Very Young Alluvial Fan Deposits, which have no paleontological sensitivity. In addition, Pleistocene deposits, which have a high paleontological sensitivity, likely exist at depths beneath these Holocene deposits, possibly as shallow as 20 ft. below the current surface. However, because excavation is not expected to reach these Pleistocene deposits, development of this project is not expected to impact significant paleontological resources. On a broader level, the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.6) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan. According to the research performed at the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County and the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the Sphere -of -Influence, including the project site; however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources. The older alluvium, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last "Ice Age" and the Rev 3-1-16 P649 P650 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00451 AND DRC2016-00508 Page 44 appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils. The project site is underlain by Quaternary alluvium per the Public Safety Element of the General Plan; therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 2. If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth -disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth -disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. d) The proposed project is in an area that has already been disturbed by development. The project site has already been disrupted by periodic discing for weed abatement. A review of the 2010 General Plan indicates that no known religious archaeological or sacred archaeological sites exist within the project area. No evidence is in place to suggest the project site has been used for human burials. The California Health and Safety Code (Section 7050.5) states that if human remains are discovered on-site, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. As adherence to State regulations is required for all development, no mitigation is required in the unlikely event human remains are discovered on-site. No adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 3-1-16 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant with Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils. The project site is underlain by Quaternary alluvium per the Public Safety Element of the General Plan; therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 2. If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth -disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth -disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. d) The proposed project is in an area that has already been disturbed by development. The project site has already been disrupted by periodic discing for weed abatement. A review of the 2010 General Plan indicates that no known religious archaeological or sacred archaeological sites exist within the project area. No evidence is in place to suggest the project site has been used for human burials. The California Health and Safety Code (Section 7050.5) states that if human remains are discovered on-site, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. As adherence to State regulations is required for all development, no mitigation is required in the unlikely event human remains are discovered on-site. No adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 3-1-16 P651 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00451 AND DRC2016-00508 age 45 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project Less Than a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial Significant Less and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation ThanIssues Significant No death involving: Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as () () () (✓) delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? () () (✓) ( ) iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including () () () (✓) liquefaction? iv) Landslides? () () () (✓) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? () (✓) () ( ) C) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, () () () (✓) or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table () () () (✓) 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use () () () (✓) of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? Comments: a) According to the Geotechnical Report (Geo Tek, Inc.; January 2016), no known faults pass through the site and it is not in an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone The project site is not in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault, according to the General Plan Figure PS -2, and Section 4.7 of the General Plan FPEIR. The Red Hill Fault, passes within approximately 1.5 miles north of the site, and the Sierra Madre and Cucamonga Fault Zones lie approximately 3.5 miles north of the site. These faults are both capable of producing MW 6.0-7.0 earthquakes. Also, the San Jacinto fault, capable of producing up to MW 7.5 earthquakes is 14 miles northeasterly of the site and the San Andreas, capable of up to MW 8.2 earthquakes, is 16 miles northeasterly of the site. Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking. According to the Geotechnical Report (Geo Tek, Inc.; January 2016), the project site is not within a zone of potentially liquefiable soils by the San Bernardino County Land Use Services. Additionally, liquefaction is not considered a hazard at the site due to great depth of groundwater (greater than 200 feet) and the underlying dense nature of the subsurface soils. There is no evidence of ancient landslide or slope instabilities on the site; as such, the potential for landslides is Rev 3-1-16 P652 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00451 AND DRC2016-00508 age 46 considered negligible (Geo Tek, Inc.; January 2016). Adhering to the Uniform Building Code and Standard Conditions will ensure that geologic impacts are less -than -significant. b) The City of Rancho Cucamonga is within a designated Soil Erosion Control Area Exhibit 4.7-4 of the General Plan FPEIR. The proposed project will require the excavation, stockpiling, and/or movement of on-site soils. The Rancho Cucamonga area is subject to strong Santa Ana wind conditions during September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems. Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust control; however, development of this project under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area as pavement, roads, buildings, and landscaping are established. Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less -than -significant levels: 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil -stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re -planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off- site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM10 emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil -stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PMio emissions. C) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.7) indicates that there is a potential for the hillside areas at the northern end of the City and in the SOI for slope failure, landslides, and/or erosion. Areas subject to slope instability contain slopes of 30 percent or greater. Landslides may be induced by seismic activity, rain, or construction. The City Hillside Development Regulations permit development within slopes of 30 percent or greater only under certain conditions, and limits the number of units that could be constructed within the Hillside Residential and Very Low Density Residential designations in the Hillside areas. The site is not within an Earthquake hazard zone or other unstable geologic unit or soil type according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-2. Soil types on-site consist of Tujunga loamy sand/gravel soil association according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7- 3. Runoff is slow to very slow. No adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The majority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the project site, is located on alluvial soil deposits. These types of soils are not considered to be expansive. Soil types on-site consist of Tujunga loamy sand/gravel soil association according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-3. Runoff is slow to very slow. These soils have slight hazard of water erosion. No adverse impacts are anticipated. e) The project will connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal. No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed. Rev 3-1-16 Less Than Significant Less and Supporting Information Sources: Potentiallywith Significant Mitigation ThanIssues Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact considered negligible (Geo Tek, Inc.; January 2016). Adhering to the Uniform Building Code and Standard Conditions will ensure that geologic impacts are less -than -significant. b) The City of Rancho Cucamonga is within a designated Soil Erosion Control Area Exhibit 4.7-4 of the General Plan FPEIR. The proposed project will require the excavation, stockpiling, and/or movement of on-site soils. The Rancho Cucamonga area is subject to strong Santa Ana wind conditions during September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems. Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust control; however, development of this project under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area as pavement, roads, buildings, and landscaping are established. Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less -than -significant levels: 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil -stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re -planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off- site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM10 emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil -stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PMio emissions. C) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.7) indicates that there is a potential for the hillside areas at the northern end of the City and in the SOI for slope failure, landslides, and/or erosion. Areas subject to slope instability contain slopes of 30 percent or greater. Landslides may be induced by seismic activity, rain, or construction. The City Hillside Development Regulations permit development within slopes of 30 percent or greater only under certain conditions, and limits the number of units that could be constructed within the Hillside Residential and Very Low Density Residential designations in the Hillside areas. The site is not within an Earthquake hazard zone or other unstable geologic unit or soil type according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-2. Soil types on-site consist of Tujunga loamy sand/gravel soil association according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7- 3. Runoff is slow to very slow. No adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The majority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the project site, is located on alluvial soil deposits. These types of soils are not considered to be expansive. Soil types on-site consist of Tujunga loamy sand/gravel soil association according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-3. Runoff is slow to very slow. These soils have slight hazard of water erosion. No adverse impacts are anticipated. e) The project will connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal. No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed. Rev 3-1-16 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00451 AND DRC2016-00508 Page 47 7. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. Would the project: Less Than a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or () Significant Less ( ) Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: pp g Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No environment? Impact Incorporated Impact Im act 7. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. Would the project: a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or () (✓) () ( ) indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation () () (✓) ( ) adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? Comments: a) Background, Regulations and Significance — The Federal government began studying the phenomenon of global warming as early as 1979 with the National Climate Protection Act (92 Stat. 601). In June of 2005, Governor Schwarzenegger established California's Green House Gas (GHG) emissions reduction target in Executive Order (EO) S-3-05. The EO created goals to reduce GHG emissions for the State of California to 2000 levels by 2010; GHG emissions reduced to 1990 levels by 2020; and GHG emissions reduced to 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050. Additionally, on December 7, 2009 the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) issued findings regarding GHGs under rule 202(a) of the Clean Air Act: (1) that GHGs endanger human health; and (2) that this will be the first steps to regulating GHGs through the Federal Clean Air Act. The USEPA defines 6 key GHGs (carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6)). The combined emissions of these well -mixed greenhouse gases from new motor vehicles and engines contribute to GHG pollution. The western states, including Arizona, California, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, and Washington, already experience hotter, drier climates. California is a substantial contributor of GHGs and is expected to see an increase of 3 to 4 degrees Fahrenheit (°F) over the next century. Assembly Bill (AB) 32 requires that the California Air Resources Board (ARB), the lead agency for implementing AB 32, determine what the statewide GHG emission level was in 1990 and approve a statewide GHG emissions limit (427 million metric tons of CO2 equivalent) to be achieved by 2020 and prepare a Scoping Plan to outline the main strategies for meeting the 2020 deadline. Significant progress can be made toward the 2020 goal through existing technologies and improving the efficiency of energy use. Other solutions would include improving the State's infrastructure, and transitioning to cleaner and more efficient sources of energy. The ARB estimates that 38 percent of the State's GHG emissions in 2004 was from transportation sources followed by electricity generation (both in -State and out -of -State) at 28 percent and industrial at 20 percent. Residential and commercial activities account for 9 percent, agricultural uses at 6 percent, high global warming potential gases at 3 percent, and recycling and waste at 1 percent. It is not anticipated that any single development project would have a substantial effect on global climate change but that GHG emissions from the project would combine with emissions across California, the United States, and the world to cumulatively contribute to global climate change. Therefore, consistent with the ARB's Climate Change Scoping Rev 3-1-16 P653 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00451 AND DRC2016-00508 Page 48 Plan, the proposed project was evaluated for consistency with the Early Action Measures (Scoping Plan is a recommendation until adopted through normal rulemaking). The proposed project is assessed by determining its consistency with the 37 Recommended Actions identified by ARB. In compliance with Senate Bill (SB) 97 and CEQA, the project has been analyzed based on a qualitative analysis (CEQA 15064.4). Additionally, the ARB was directed through SB 375 to develop regional GHG emission reduction targets to be achieved within the automobile and light truck sectors for 2020 and 2035. SCAQMD and ARB maintain ambient air quality monitoring stations in the Basin. The stations closest to the project site are the Upland station and the Fontana -Arrow Highway station. The Upland station monitors all criteria pollutants except PM1o, PM2.5, and SO2 which are monitored at the Fontana -Arrow Highway station. The ambient air quality in the project area for CO, NO2, and SO2 are consistently below the relevant State and federal standards (based on ARB and EPA from 2007, 2008, and 2009 readings). Ozone, PM1o, and PM2.5 levels all exceed State and federal standards regularly. Project Related Sources of GHG's — Based on the Guidelines for the Implementation of California Environmental Quality Act, Appendix G, a project would normally be considered to have a significant effect on air quality if the project would violate any ambient air quality standards, contribute substantially to an existing air quality violation, expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations, or conflict with adopted environmental plans and goals of the community. However, neither the CEQA statutes, Office of Planning and Research (OPR) guidelines, nor the draft proposed changes to the CEQA Guidelines prescribe thresholds of significance or a particular methodology for performing an impact analysis. Significance criteria are left to the judgment and discretion of the Lead Agency. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has not established local CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act) significance thresholds for greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Section 15064.7 of the CEQA Amendments states that "[w]hen adopting thresholds of significance, a lead agency may consider thresholds of significance previously adopted or recommended by other public agencies or recommended by experts." As such, the City has selected two quantitative approaches to determining potential GHG emissions impacts: 1) The Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (AB 32) approach and 2) the South Coast Air Quality Management District Efficiency Measure approach. Under the AB 32 approach, GHG emissions that would be generated pursuant to development of the project area are compared with GHG emissions for a "Business as Usual" (BAU) scenario. This comparison indicates whether GHG emissions generated by the development of the project area would likely be consistent with the CARB Scoping Plan GHG emissions reductions measures and GHG emissions reductions targets. In summary, the Scoping Plan reflect implementation of measures that would achieve an approximate 28.5% reduction in GHG emissions when compared to GHG emissions produced under a "Business as Usual" scenario. Results of the analysis indicate that the Project GHG emissions would not result in or cause a potentially significant impact on the environment. To this end, the analysis demonstrates that the project is consistent with, or otherwise not in conflict with, recommended measures and actions in the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan as Rev 3-1-16 P654 Less Than Significant Less and Supporting Information Sources: PotentiallyWith Significant Mitigation ThanIssues Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Plan, the proposed project was evaluated for consistency with the Early Action Measures (Scoping Plan is a recommendation until adopted through normal rulemaking). The proposed project is assessed by determining its consistency with the 37 Recommended Actions identified by ARB. In compliance with Senate Bill (SB) 97 and CEQA, the project has been analyzed based on a qualitative analysis (CEQA 15064.4). Additionally, the ARB was directed through SB 375 to develop regional GHG emission reduction targets to be achieved within the automobile and light truck sectors for 2020 and 2035. SCAQMD and ARB maintain ambient air quality monitoring stations in the Basin. The stations closest to the project site are the Upland station and the Fontana -Arrow Highway station. The Upland station monitors all criteria pollutants except PM1o, PM2.5, and SO2 which are monitored at the Fontana -Arrow Highway station. The ambient air quality in the project area for CO, NO2, and SO2 are consistently below the relevant State and federal standards (based on ARB and EPA from 2007, 2008, and 2009 readings). Ozone, PM1o, and PM2.5 levels all exceed State and federal standards regularly. Project Related Sources of GHG's — Based on the Guidelines for the Implementation of California Environmental Quality Act, Appendix G, a project would normally be considered to have a significant effect on air quality if the project would violate any ambient air quality standards, contribute substantially to an existing air quality violation, expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations, or conflict with adopted environmental plans and goals of the community. However, neither the CEQA statutes, Office of Planning and Research (OPR) guidelines, nor the draft proposed changes to the CEQA Guidelines prescribe thresholds of significance or a particular methodology for performing an impact analysis. Significance criteria are left to the judgment and discretion of the Lead Agency. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has not established local CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act) significance thresholds for greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Section 15064.7 of the CEQA Amendments states that "[w]hen adopting thresholds of significance, a lead agency may consider thresholds of significance previously adopted or recommended by other public agencies or recommended by experts." As such, the City has selected two quantitative approaches to determining potential GHG emissions impacts: 1) The Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (AB 32) approach and 2) the South Coast Air Quality Management District Efficiency Measure approach. Under the AB 32 approach, GHG emissions that would be generated pursuant to development of the project area are compared with GHG emissions for a "Business as Usual" (BAU) scenario. This comparison indicates whether GHG emissions generated by the development of the project area would likely be consistent with the CARB Scoping Plan GHG emissions reductions measures and GHG emissions reductions targets. In summary, the Scoping Plan reflect implementation of measures that would achieve an approximate 28.5% reduction in GHG emissions when compared to GHG emissions produced under a "Business as Usual" scenario. Results of the analysis indicate that the Project GHG emissions would not result in or cause a potentially significant impact on the environment. To this end, the analysis demonstrates that the project is consistent with, or otherwise not in conflict with, recommended measures and actions in the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan as Rev 3-1-16 P654 P655 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00451 AND DRC2016-00508 Page 49 well as the CARB Scoping Plan. The Scoping Plan establishes strategies and measures to implement in order to achieve the GHG reductions goals set forth in AB 32. As shown in Table ES -1 from the Greenhouse Gas Analysis (GHG Analysis) by Urban Crossroads (July 19, 2016), project GHG emissions would be reduced by approximately 31.06% when compared to the BAU against a 2020 horizon year scenario. This reduction is consistent with the target reduction percentage of 28.5% based on the CARB's analysis supporting AB 32. TABLE ES -1: SUMMARY OF GHG EMISSIONS FOR BAU VS PROJECT (ANNUAL) Emission Source CO2e Emissions Levels by Year (Metric Tons Per Year) BAU 2020 Less Than 107.38 107.38 Area 127.93 98.35 Energy Use Significant Less 5,415.11 3,538.01 Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: pp g Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No 8,613.54 5,939.66 Impact Incorporated Impact Impact well as the CARB Scoping Plan. The Scoping Plan establishes strategies and measures to implement in order to achieve the GHG reductions goals set forth in AB 32. As shown in Table ES -1 from the Greenhouse Gas Analysis (GHG Analysis) by Urban Crossroads (July 19, 2016), project GHG emissions would be reduced by approximately 31.06% when compared to the BAU against a 2020 horizon year scenario. This reduction is consistent with the target reduction percentage of 28.5% based on the CARB's analysis supporting AB 32. TABLE ES -1: SUMMARY OF GHG EMISSIONS FOR BAU VS PROJECT (ANNUAL) Emission Source CO2e Emissions Levels by Year (Metric Tons Per Year) BAU 2020 Annual Construction -related emissions amortized over 30 years 107.38 107.38 Area 127.93 98.35 Energy Use 2,571.78 1,858.09 Mobile Sources 5,415.11 3,538.01 Waste 178.72 178.72 Water Usage 212.62 159.11 Total 8,613.54 5,939.66 Project Minimum Reduction over 2008 levels 31.04% Minimum Improvement 28.5% Meets Requirement? YES SCAQMD Efficiency Measure (Tier 4 Option 3) The SCAQMD has convened a GHG CEQA Significance Threshold Working Group (Working Group). Based on the last Working Group meeting (Meeting No. 15) held in September 2010, SCAQMD is proposing to adopt a tiered approach for evaluating GHG emissions for development projects where SCAQMD is not the lead agency. SCAQMD had proposed an efficiency -based threshold approach using a 2020 target. A sector - based, project level efficiency significance threshold approach was utilized in this analysis, in which a 2020 statewide employment for land use sectors was divided by 2020 statewide service population (SP), amounting to a 4.8 MTCO2e per service population threshold (GHG Analysis; page 47). Rev 3-1-16 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00451 AND DRC2016-00508 Paae 50 As shown in Table ES -2 (GHG Analysis by Urban Crossroads [July 19, 2016]), the proposed project will result in approximately 2.98 MTCO2e per service population and would not exceed the threshold of 4.8 MTCO2e per service population. Therefore, project - related emissions would not have a significant direct or indirect impact on GHG and climate change. TABLE ES -2: TOTAL PROJECT GHG EMISSIONS (ANNUAL) Emission Source Less Than CO2 CH4 N20 Significant Less 107.02 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Area Impact Incorporated Impact Im act As shown in Table ES -2 (GHG Analysis by Urban Crossroads [July 19, 2016]), the proposed project will result in approximately 2.98 MTCO2e per service population and would not exceed the threshold of 4.8 MTCO2e per service population. Therefore, project - related emissions would not have a significant direct or indirect impact on GHG and climate change. TABLE ES -2: TOTAL PROJECT GHG EMISSIONS (ANNUAL) Emission Source Emissions (metric tons per year) CO2 CH4 N20 Total Annual construction -related emissions amortized over 30 years 107.02 0.02 -- 107.38 Area 97.66 0.01 0.00 98.35 Energy 1,847.60 0.08 0.03 1,858.09 Mobile Sources 3,535.45 0.12 0 3,538.01 Waste 79.75 4.71 0 178.72 Water Usage 130.61 0.99 2.00E-02 159.11 Total CO2E (All Sources) 5,939.66 Total Service Population 1994 Total CO2E (All Sources)/ Service Population 2.98 Threshold Service Population Threshold 4.8 Exceedance? NO Cumulative Short Term (Construction) GHG Emissions — The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.5) indicates that GHG emissions result from construction activities associated with diesel -powered construction equipment and other combustion sources (i.e., generators, workers vehicles, material delivery, etc.). The GHG emitted by construction equipment is primarily carbon dioxide (CO2). The highest levels of construction related GHG's occur during site preparation including demolition, grading and excavation. Construction related GHG's are also emitted from off-site haul trucks and construction workers traveling to the job site. Exhaust emissions from construction activities would vary each day with the changes in construction activity on site. The combustion of fossil - Rev 3-1-16 P656 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00451 AND DRC2016-00508 Page 51 based fuels creates GHG's such as CO2, Cha, and N2O. CH4 is emitted during the fueling of heavy equipment. Based on the Greenhouse Gas Analysis prepared by Urban Crossroads (July 19, 2016) no significant impacts to GHGs from short-term construction impacts would occur as a result of the project as shown in Tables ES -1 and ES -2 above. Because the project would result in minimal emissions that do not exceed the SCAQMD's interim threshold of significance, the project's contribution to cumulative impacts is also considered minimal. The proposed project would have less than a significant, short-term cumulative impact with implementation of the following enforceable actions, which are included as mitigation measures in accordance with Mitigation Measure 4.5-1 of the 2010 General Plan Update FPEIR: 1) The project must comply with all rules that assist in reducing short-term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAQMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil -stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 2) The construction contractor shall select construction equipment based on low -emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures' specification. 3) Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 minutes. 4) Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline- or diesel -powered engines where feasible. 5) Construction should be timed so as not to interfere with peak -hour traffic. 6) Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be supported and encouraged for the construction crew. Cumulative Long Term (Operational) GHG's Emissions — The primary source of GHG emissions generated by the proposed project would be from motor vehicles, combustion of natural gas for space and water heating, as well as off-site GHG emissions from generation of electricity consumed by the proposed land use development over a long term. CEQA requires the Lead Agency to review the project for "adequacy, completeness, and a good faith effort at full disclosure," to determine potential impacts of GHGs. Accordingly, the project has been analyzed based on methodologies and information available to the City at the time this document was prepared. Estimates are based on past performance and represent a scenario that is a worst case with the understanding that technology changes may reduce GHG emissions in the future. To date, there is no established quantified GHG emission threshold. The project involves the construction of 380 residential units (329 townhomes and 51 single-family dwelling units), two restaurant pads totaling 12,000 square feet and one 71 room hotel and therefore would result in an increase in the net increases of both stationary and mobile source emissions. The majority of energy consumption typically occurs during project operation (more than 80 percent and less than 20 percent during construction Rev 3-1-16 P657 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Fa Signifignificanntt With With Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Im act based fuels creates GHG's such as CO2, Cha, and N2O. CH4 is emitted during the fueling of heavy equipment. Based on the Greenhouse Gas Analysis prepared by Urban Crossroads (July 19, 2016) no significant impacts to GHGs from short-term construction impacts would occur as a result of the project as shown in Tables ES -1 and ES -2 above. Because the project would result in minimal emissions that do not exceed the SCAQMD's interim threshold of significance, the project's contribution to cumulative impacts is also considered minimal. The proposed project would have less than a significant, short-term cumulative impact with implementation of the following enforceable actions, which are included as mitigation measures in accordance with Mitigation Measure 4.5-1 of the 2010 General Plan Update FPEIR: 1) The project must comply with all rules that assist in reducing short-term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAQMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil -stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 2) The construction contractor shall select construction equipment based on low -emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures' specification. 3) Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 minutes. 4) Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline- or diesel -powered engines where feasible. 5) Construction should be timed so as not to interfere with peak -hour traffic. 6) Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be supported and encouraged for the construction crew. Cumulative Long Term (Operational) GHG's Emissions — The primary source of GHG emissions generated by the proposed project would be from motor vehicles, combustion of natural gas for space and water heating, as well as off-site GHG emissions from generation of electricity consumed by the proposed land use development over a long term. CEQA requires the Lead Agency to review the project for "adequacy, completeness, and a good faith effort at full disclosure," to determine potential impacts of GHGs. Accordingly, the project has been analyzed based on methodologies and information available to the City at the time this document was prepared. Estimates are based on past performance and represent a scenario that is a worst case with the understanding that technology changes may reduce GHG emissions in the future. To date, there is no established quantified GHG emission threshold. The project involves the construction of 380 residential units (329 townhomes and 51 single-family dwelling units), two restaurant pads totaling 12,000 square feet and one 71 room hotel and therefore would result in an increase in the net increases of both stationary and mobile source emissions. The majority of energy consumption typically occurs during project operation (more than 80 percent and less than 20 percent during construction Rev 3-1-16 P657 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00451 AND DRC2016-00508 Page 52 activities). The proposed project will incorporate several design features that are consistent with the California Office of the Attorney General's recommended measures to reduce GHG emission including: water efficient landscaping, shade trees, and walkways that provide accessibility to public sidewalks. The project is consistent with the California Environmental Protection Agency Climate Action Team proposed early action measures to mitigate climate change included in the CARB Scoping Plan mandated under AB 32. The proposed project will incorporate several design features including: water efficient landscaping, shade trees, and walkways that provide accessibility to public sidewalks. Additionally, the City is participating in the development of a Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) with SANBAG for the San Bernardino County area pursuant to Senate Bill (SB) 375. Based on the Greenhouse Gas Analysis prepared by Urban Crossroads (July 19, 2016), no significant impacts to GHGs from long-term, operational impacts would occur as a result of the project as shown in Tables ES -1 and ES -2 above. Because the project would result in minimal emissions that do not exceed the SCAQMD's interim threshold of significance, the project's contribution to cumulative impacts is also considered minimal. The proposed project would have less than a significant, long-term operational impact with implementation of the following enforceable actions, which are included as mitigation measures in accordance with Mitigation Measure 4.5-1 of the 2010 General Plan Update FPEIR: 7) Construction and Building materials shall be produced and/or manufactured locally. Use "Green Building Materials" such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low -volatile -organic -compound (VOC) materials. 8) Design all buildings to exceed California Building Code Title 24 energy standard including, but not limited to, any combination of: • Increased insulation. • Limit air leakage through the structure. • Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances. • Landscape and develop site utilizing shade, prevailing winds and landscaping. • Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems. • Install light colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements. • Install solar or light emitting diodes (LED's) for outdoor lighting. 9) Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and include the following; Rev 3-1-16 P658 Less Than Significant Less Issues and SU ortin Information Sour PP g Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact activities). The proposed project will incorporate several design features that are consistent with the California Office of the Attorney General's recommended measures to reduce GHG emission including: water efficient landscaping, shade trees, and walkways that provide accessibility to public sidewalks. The project is consistent with the California Environmental Protection Agency Climate Action Team proposed early action measures to mitigate climate change included in the CARB Scoping Plan mandated under AB 32. The proposed project will incorporate several design features including: water efficient landscaping, shade trees, and walkways that provide accessibility to public sidewalks. Additionally, the City is participating in the development of a Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) with SANBAG for the San Bernardino County area pursuant to Senate Bill (SB) 375. Based on the Greenhouse Gas Analysis prepared by Urban Crossroads (July 19, 2016), no significant impacts to GHGs from long-term, operational impacts would occur as a result of the project as shown in Tables ES -1 and ES -2 above. Because the project would result in minimal emissions that do not exceed the SCAQMD's interim threshold of significance, the project's contribution to cumulative impacts is also considered minimal. The proposed project would have less than a significant, long-term operational impact with implementation of the following enforceable actions, which are included as mitigation measures in accordance with Mitigation Measure 4.5-1 of the 2010 General Plan Update FPEIR: 7) Construction and Building materials shall be produced and/or manufactured locally. Use "Green Building Materials" such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low -volatile -organic -compound (VOC) materials. 8) Design all buildings to exceed California Building Code Title 24 energy standard including, but not limited to, any combination of: • Increased insulation. • Limit air leakage through the structure. • Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances. • Landscape and develop site utilizing shade, prevailing winds and landscaping. • Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems. • Install light colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements. • Install solar or light emitting diodes (LED's) for outdoor lighting. 9) Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and include the following; Rev 3-1-16 P658 P659 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00451 AND DRC2016-00508 Page 53 • Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. • Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available or as required by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD). • Design building to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets, dual flush toilets and waterless urinals/water heaters. • Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non -vegetated surfaces. 10) Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educate employees about reducing waste and about recycling. b) The project involves the development of the construction of 380 residential units (329 townhomes and 51 single-family dwelling units), two restaurant pads totaling 12,000 square feet and one 71 room hotel, which is consistent with the General Plan Mixed Use designation. The project includes a Victoria Community Plan Amendment to change the existing zoning from Regionally Related Office Commercial (RROC) District to Mixed Use (MU) District in order to 1) be consistent with the General Plan and 2) implement the goals of the General Plan. Consistency with AB 32 AB 32 requires California to reduce its GHG emissions by approximately 28.5% when compared to GHG emissions produced under a Business as Usual scenario (GHG Analysis; page 47). CARB identified reduction measures to achieve this goal as set forth in the CARB Scoping Plan. Thus, projects that are consistent with the CARB Scoping Plan are also consistent with the 28.5% reduction below business as usual required by AB 32. The Project would generate GHG emissions from a variety of sources which would all emit Carbon Dioxide (CO2), Methane (CH4) and N2O. GHGs could also be indirectly generated by incremental electricity consumption and waste generation from the Project. The CARB Scoping Plan recommends strategies for implementation at the statewide level to meet the goals of AB 32. The CARB Scoping Plan recommendations serve as statewide measures to reduce GHG emissions levels. Project consistency with applicable CARB Scoping Plan GHG emissions reduction measures is summarized at Table ES -2. TABLE ES -3: PROJECT CONSISTENCY WITH SCOPING PLAN GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSION REDUCTION Rev 3-1-16 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially ant Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact • Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. • Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available or as required by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD). • Design building to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets, dual flush toilets and waterless urinals/water heaters. • Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non -vegetated surfaces. 10) Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educate employees about reducing waste and about recycling. b) The project involves the development of the construction of 380 residential units (329 townhomes and 51 single-family dwelling units), two restaurant pads totaling 12,000 square feet and one 71 room hotel, which is consistent with the General Plan Mixed Use designation. The project includes a Victoria Community Plan Amendment to change the existing zoning from Regionally Related Office Commercial (RROC) District to Mixed Use (MU) District in order to 1) be consistent with the General Plan and 2) implement the goals of the General Plan. Consistency with AB 32 AB 32 requires California to reduce its GHG emissions by approximately 28.5% when compared to GHG emissions produced under a Business as Usual scenario (GHG Analysis; page 47). CARB identified reduction measures to achieve this goal as set forth in the CARB Scoping Plan. Thus, projects that are consistent with the CARB Scoping Plan are also consistent with the 28.5% reduction below business as usual required by AB 32. The Project would generate GHG emissions from a variety of sources which would all emit Carbon Dioxide (CO2), Methane (CH4) and N2O. GHGs could also be indirectly generated by incremental electricity consumption and waste generation from the Project. The CARB Scoping Plan recommends strategies for implementation at the statewide level to meet the goals of AB 32. The CARB Scoping Plan recommendations serve as statewide measures to reduce GHG emissions levels. Project consistency with applicable CARB Scoping Plan GHG emissions reduction measures is summarized at Table ES -2. TABLE ES -3: PROJECT CONSISTENCY WITH SCOPING PLAN GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSION REDUCTION Rev 3-1-16 P66O Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00451 AND DRC2016-00508 Paae 54 Scoping Plan Measure Measure Number Less Than Pavley Motor Vehicle Residents, employees, and customers would purchase Standards (AB 1493) Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Consumer Products Impact Incorporated Impact impact Scoping Plan Measure Measure Number Remarks Pavley Motor Vehicle Residents, employees, and customers would purchase Standards (AB 1493) T-1 vehicles in compliance with incumbent CARB vehicle standards Limit High GWP Use in H-4 Residents, employees, and customers would use consumer Consumer Products products that would comply with the incumbent regulations Motor Vehicle Air Conditioning Systems — Residents, employees, and customers would be prohibited Reduction from Non- H-1 from performing air conditioning repairs and required to use Professional Servicing professional servicing. Motor vehicles driven by residents, employees, and Tire Pressure Program T-4 customers would maintain proper tire pressure when vehicles are serviced. Low Carbon Fuel Motor vehicles driven by residents, employees, and Standard T-2 customers would use fuels that are compliant with incumbent standards. Development proposals within the Project site would Water Use Efficiency W-1 implement measures to minimize water use and maximize efficiency. Development proposals within the Project site would be Green Buildings GB -1 constructed in compliance with incumbent state or local green building standards. Air Conditioning Refrigerant Leak Test Motor vehicles driven by residents, employees, and During Vehicle Smog H-5 customers would comply with the leak test requirements Check during smog checks. Energy Efficiency E-1 The Project would comply with incumbent electrical energy Measures (Electricity) efficiency standards Energy Efficiency (Natural CR -1 Development proposals within the Project site would comply Gas) with incumbent natural gas energy efficiency standards Greening New Residential and Commercial GB -1 Development proposals within the Project site would comply Construction with incumbent green building standards Rev 3-1-16 P661 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00451 AND DRC2016-00508 Page 55 Scoping Plan Measure Measure Number Less Than Greening Existing Homes GB -1 Development proposals within the Project site would meet and Commercial Buildings Significant Less (✓) Issues and SU ortin Information Sources. pp g Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No disposal of hazardous materials? Impact Incorporated Impact Im act Scoping Plan Measure Measure Number Remarks Greening Existing Homes GB -1 Development proposals within the Project site would meet and Commercial Buildings () retrofit standards as they become effective. No other applicable plans, policies, or regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emission apply to the project. The 2010 General Plan Update includes adopted policies and Standard Conditions that respond to the Attorney General and the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA). The General Plan policies and Standard Conditions guide infill and sustainable development reliant on pedestrian connections, re -use and rehabilitation of existing structures, link transportation opportunities, promote development that is sensitive to natural resources and incentivizes denser, mixed use projects that maximize diverse opportunities. The proposed project includes water efficient landscaping, shade trees, and walkways that provide accessibility to public sidewalks and therefore is consistent with the sustainability and climate change policies of the General Plan. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of GHG's and determined that GHG emissions would be cumulatively considerable, which would be a significant, unavoidable adverse cumulative impact. A Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. Based on the Greenhouse Gas Analysis prepared by Urban CrossRoads (July 19, 2016, no significant impacts to GHGs from short-term, construction impacts or long-term, operational impacts would occur as a result of the project. Because the project would result in minimal emissions that do not exceed the SCAQMD's interim threshold of significance, the project's contribution to cumulative GHGs from short-term construction and long-term operational cumulative impacts is also considered minimal. With implementation of the mitigation measures listed in subsection a), less than significant impacts would occur as a result of the project. In addition, the proposed project would not hinder the State's GHG reduction goals established by AB 32 as the project has a business as usual reduction of 31.06% and exceeds the 28.5% reduction below business as usual required by AB 32. Therefore, the impact would be less than a significant impact. 8. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the project.- roject.a) a)Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (✓) environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (✓) environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? C) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or () () () (✓) acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school? Rev 3-1-16 P662 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00451 AND DRC2016-00508 Page 56 d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of () Less Than () (✓) hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No would it create a significant hazard to the public or the Impact Incorporated Impact Impact d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of () () () (✓) hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (✓) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, () () () (✓) would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an () () () (✓) adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of () () () (✓) loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Comments: a) The project includes hotel, restaurant and residential land uses; accordingly, the proposed project does not involve the use of hazardous materials in large quantities that would potentially result in a hazard to the public through the transport, use or disposal of hazardous materials. Development within the City may utilize or generate hazardous materials or wastes. This is usually associated with individual households, small business operations, and maintenance activities like paints, cleaning solvents, fertilizers, and motor oil or through construction activities that would use paints, solvents, acids, curing compounds, grease, and oils. These materials would be stored and used at individual sites. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition, which is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the State. The City has an Emergency Operations Plan that meets State and Federal requirements and is in the process of updating the approved 2005 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less -than -significant. No adverse impacts are expected. b) The project includes hotel, restaurant and residential land uses; accordingly, the proposed project does not involve the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels in large quantities that would potentially result the release of hazardous materials into the environment. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition, which is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the State. The City has an Emergency Operations Plan that meets State and Federal requirements and is in the process of updating the approved 2005 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less -than -significant. No adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 3-1-16 P663 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00451 AND DRC2016-00508 age 57 C) There are no schools located within 1/4 mile of the project site. The project site is approximately 1.25 miles south of the nearest school, Windrows Elementary located at 6855 Victoria Park Lane. Typically, hotels, restaurants and residential uses do not create objectionable odors. No adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The proposed project is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site. Recent site inspections did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials. No impact is anticipated. e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan according to the General Plan Figure PS -7, General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.8-1 and the Ontario Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport. The project site is located approximately 4.5 northeasterly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. No impact is anticipated. f) There are no private airstrips within the City. The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2.5 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated. g) The City has a developed roadway network that provides emergency access and evacuation routes to existing development. New development will be located on a site that has access to existing roadways. The City's Emergency Operation Plan, which is updated every three years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in the event of a disaster. Since the project has three points of public street access and one additional Emergency Vehicle Access (EVA) and is required to comply with all applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances, no adverse impacts are anticipated. h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from wind -driven fires in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone found in the northern part of the City; however, the proposed project site is not located within a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone according to General Plan Figure PS -1. No adverse impacts are anticipated. 9. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? ( ) Less Than () ( ) b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere ( ) Significant Less (✓) Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a Impact Incorporated Impact Impact C) There are no schools located within 1/4 mile of the project site. The project site is approximately 1.25 miles south of the nearest school, Windrows Elementary located at 6855 Victoria Park Lane. Typically, hotels, restaurants and residential uses do not create objectionable odors. No adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The proposed project is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site. Recent site inspections did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials. No impact is anticipated. e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan according to the General Plan Figure PS -7, General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.8-1 and the Ontario Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport. The project site is located approximately 4.5 northeasterly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. No impact is anticipated. f) There are no private airstrips within the City. The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2.5 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated. g) The City has a developed roadway network that provides emergency access and evacuation routes to existing development. New development will be located on a site that has access to existing roadways. The City's Emergency Operation Plan, which is updated every three years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in the event of a disaster. Since the project has three points of public street access and one additional Emergency Vehicle Access (EVA) and is required to comply with all applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances, no adverse impacts are anticipated. h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from wind -driven fires in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone found in the northern part of the City; however, the proposed project site is not located within a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone according to General Plan Figure PS -1. No adverse impacts are anticipated. 9. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? ( ) (✓) () ( ) b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere ( ) () () (✓) substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? C) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the () () () (✓) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? Rev 3-1-16 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00451 AND DRC2016-00508 Page 58 d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the () Less Than () (✓) site or area, including through the alteration of the Significant Less and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation ThanIssues Significant No the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, Impact Incorporated Impact Impact d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the () () () (✓) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on- or off-site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed () () () (✓) the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? () (✓) () ( ) g) Place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area as ( ) () () (✓) mapped on a Federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100 -year flood hazard area structures ( ) () () (✓) that would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of ( ) () () (✓) loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? () () () (✓) Comments: a) Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD). The project is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems. The State of California is authorized to administer various aspects of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act. The General Construction Permit treats any construction activity over 1 acre as an industrial activity, requiring a permit under the State's General NPDES permit. The State Water Resource Control Board (SWRCB), through the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), Santa Ana Region, administers these permits. Construction activities covered under the State's General Construction permit include removal of vegetation, grading, excavating, or any other activity for new development or significant redevelopment. Prior to commencement of construction of a project, a discharger must submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to obtain coverage under the General Permit. The General Permit requires all dischargers to comply with the following during construction activities, including site clearance and grading: Develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that would specify Best Management Practices (BMPs) to prevent construction pollutants from contacting storm water and with the intent of keeping all products of erosion from moving off-site into receiving waters. Eliminate or reduce non -storm water discharges to storm sewer systems and other waters of the nation. Perform inspections of all BMPs. Rev 3-1-16 P664 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00451 AND DRC2016-00508 age 59 Waste discharges include discharges of storm water and construction project discharges. A construction project for new development or significant redevelopment requires an NPDES permit. Construction project proponents are required to prepare an SWPPP. To comply with the NPDES, the project's construction contractor will be required to prepare an SWPPP during construction activities, and a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for post -construction operational management of storm water runoff. The applicant has submitted a Preliminary WQMP, prepared by Madole and Associates (July 2016), which identifies BMPs to minimize the amount of pollutants, such as eroded soils, entering the drainage system after construction. Runoff from driveways, roads and other impermeable surfaces must be controlled through an on-site drainage system. BMPs include both structural and non-structural control methods. Structural controls used to manage storm water pollutant levels include detention basins, oil/grit separators, and porous pavement. Non-structural controls focus on controlling pollutants at the source, generally through implementing erosion and sediment control plans, and various Business Plans that must be developed by any businesses that store and use hazardous materials. Practices such as periodic parking lot sweeping can substantially reduce the amount of pollutants entering the storm drain system. The following mitigation measures are required to control additional storm water effluent: Construction Activities: 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 5) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Rev 3-1-16 P665 Less Than Significant Less Issues and SU ortin Information Sources: PP g es Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Im act impact Waste discharges include discharges of storm water and construction project discharges. A construction project for new development or significant redevelopment requires an NPDES permit. Construction project proponents are required to prepare an SWPPP. To comply with the NPDES, the project's construction contractor will be required to prepare an SWPPP during construction activities, and a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for post -construction operational management of storm water runoff. The applicant has submitted a Preliminary WQMP, prepared by Madole and Associates (July 2016), which identifies BMPs to minimize the amount of pollutants, such as eroded soils, entering the drainage system after construction. Runoff from driveways, roads and other impermeable surfaces must be controlled through an on-site drainage system. BMPs include both structural and non-structural control methods. Structural controls used to manage storm water pollutant levels include detention basins, oil/grit separators, and porous pavement. Non-structural controls focus on controlling pollutants at the source, generally through implementing erosion and sediment control plans, and various Business Plans that must be developed by any businesses that store and use hazardous materials. Practices such as periodic parking lot sweeping can substantially reduce the amount of pollutants entering the storm drain system. The following mitigation measures are required to control additional storm water effluent: Construction Activities: 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 5) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Rev 3-1-16 P665 P666 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00451 AND DRC2016-00508 age 60 Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Post -Construction Operational: 6) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 7) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. b) According to CVWD, approximately 35 percent of the City's water is currently provided from water supplies coming from the underlying Chino and Cucamonga Groundwater Basins. CVWD complies with its prescriptive water rights as managed by the Chino Basin Watermaster and will not deplete the local groundwater resource. The proposed project will not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will it interfere with recharge because it is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Figure RC -3. Development of the site will require the grading and excavation, but would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 200 to 470 feet below the ground surface. As noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.9), continued development citywide will increase water needs but will not be a significant impact. CVWD has plans to meet this increased need to the year 2030. No impacts are anticipated. C) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on the site; however, there are no streams or rivers onsite; therefore, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The project design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, the project will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off- site. The impact is not considered significant. d) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, there are no streams or rivers onsite; therefore, the project Rev 3-1-16 Less Than Significant Less and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation ThanIssues Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Post -Construction Operational: 6) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 7) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. b) According to CVWD, approximately 35 percent of the City's water is currently provided from water supplies coming from the underlying Chino and Cucamonga Groundwater Basins. CVWD complies with its prescriptive water rights as managed by the Chino Basin Watermaster and will not deplete the local groundwater resource. The proposed project will not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will it interfere with recharge because it is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Figure RC -3. Development of the site will require the grading and excavation, but would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 200 to 470 feet below the ground surface. As noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.9), continued development citywide will increase water needs but will not be a significant impact. CVWD has plans to meet this increased need to the year 2030. No impacts are anticipated. C) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on the site; however, there are no streams or rivers onsite; therefore, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The project design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, the project will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off- site. The impact is not considered significant. d) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, there are no streams or rivers onsite; therefore, the project Rev 3-1-16 P667 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00451 AND DRC2016-00508 Page 61 will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site. No impacts are anticipated. e) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The project will not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site. No impacts are anticipated. f) Grading activities associated with the construction period could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surface flows during a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in surface water quality impacts. The project site is for the development of residential, hotel and residential uses and is therefore required to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to minimize water pollution. With implementation of the mitigation measures specified under subsection a) and below, less than significant impacts are anticipated. 8) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by (Madole and Associates, July 2016) to reduce construction pollutants from entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. g) The project site is not located within a 100 -year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS -5; no adverse impacts are expected. h) The project site is not located within a 100 -year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS -5. No adverse impacts are expected. The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm drain system designed to adequately convey floodwaters from a 100 -year storm event. The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete -lined channels, and underground storm drains as shown in General Plan Figure PS -6. The project site is not located within a 100 -year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS -5. No adverse impacts are expected. j) There are no oceans, lakes, or reservoirs near the project site; therefore impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated as the site is located over 50 miles from the Pacific Ocean. The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams. Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non- significance within the City. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City. Rev 3-1-16 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: pP g Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site. No impacts are anticipated. e) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The project will not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site. No impacts are anticipated. f) Grading activities associated with the construction period could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surface flows during a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in surface water quality impacts. The project site is for the development of residential, hotel and residential uses and is therefore required to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to minimize water pollution. With implementation of the mitigation measures specified under subsection a) and below, less than significant impacts are anticipated. 8) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by (Madole and Associates, July 2016) to reduce construction pollutants from entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. g) The project site is not located within a 100 -year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS -5; no adverse impacts are expected. h) The project site is not located within a 100 -year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS -5. No adverse impacts are expected. The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm drain system designed to adequately convey floodwaters from a 100 -year storm event. The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete -lined channels, and underground storm drains as shown in General Plan Figure PS -6. The project site is not located within a 100 -year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS -5. No adverse impacts are expected. j) There are no oceans, lakes, or reservoirs near the project site; therefore impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated as the site is located over 50 miles from the Pacific Ocean. The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams. Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non- significance within the City. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City. Rev 3-1-16 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00451 AND DRC2016-00508 Page 62 10. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project.- roject:a) Physically divide an established community? a) () Less Than () (✓) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or () Significant Less (✓) Issues and SU ortin Information Sources: pp g Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No project (including, but not limited to, a general plan, Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 10. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project.- roject:a) Physically divide an established community? a) () () () (✓) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or () () () (✓) regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? C) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan () () () (✓) or natural community conservation plan? Comments: a) The project site is located on a vacant parcel of land at the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Day Creek Boulevard and is characterized by comparable residential (single- family, two and three story multi -family) and commercial (food and retail uses) development to the north, south and east. The project will be of similar design and size to surrounding residential and commercial development to the north, south and east. No demolition or relocation of people or structures is required. The project will implement the Mixed Use Land Use Designation of the General Plan and become a part of the larger Victoria Community Plan. No adverse impacts are anticipated. b) The project site's General Plan land use designation is Mixed Use (MU). The current zoning designation is Regionally Related Office Commercial (RROC) District, Victoria Community Plan. Since there is a current vertical inconsistency between the General Plan and the Victoria Community Plan, the proposed project includes a Victoria Community Plan Amendment to change the zoning from Regionally Related Office Commercial (RROC) District to Mixed Use (MU) District to bring the Victoria Community Plan into vertical consistency with the General Plan. The Victoria Arbors Master Plan governs land uses to the east and south, while the Victoria Community Plan governs land uses to the west and north. The proposed mixed use project, consisting of a hotel, two freestanding restaurant pads and 380 residential units (51 single family and 329 townhomes), is compatible with the Victoria Arbors Master Plan located to the south and east. To the east, across Day Creek Boulevard, a major arterial, is a neighborhood center anchored by a grocery store with support retail, food and professional uses located in the center. These retail uses will complement and provide services to the proposed project. Also to the east, across Day Creek Boulevard, are single-family homes. Along the south boundary of the project is a two-story, single-family neighborhood. In order to provide land use compatibility and a transition of density, the proposed mixed use project has plotted single-family product (two-story) at the southwestern corner of the project site and in the lower quadrant of the project area. In addition, the project contains a linear park along a portion of the south edge to provide a buffer between the single-family neighborhood to the south and the project. The three- story townhomes are located in the core of the project, along Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road. The 71 room, three-story hotel and restaurant uses (two buildings totaling 12,000 square feet) are located along Base Line Road and flank the corner at Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road. To the north, across Base Line Road, is a neighborhood center with a grocery store, support retail and food uses that will provide Rev 3-1-16 P668 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00451 AND DRC2016-00508 Page 63 services to the proposed project. To the west is a Southern California Edison transmission corridor, flood control channel and vacant land. With respect to land use composition, residential product type, building massing and building heights, the proposed mixed use project is compatible with the adjacent land uses in all directions. With the proposed Victoria Community Plan Amendment, the project will be consistent with the General Plan and will not interfere with any policies for environmental protection, or SCAG's Regional Comprehensive Plan. No adverse impacts are anticipated. C) The project site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area. According to Section 4.4 of the General Plan FPEIR, the site may contain mixed sage scrub (Riversidean Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub (RAFSS). Impacts from the proposed project are considered less than significant to vegetative communities. For a complete analysis of impact to vegetative communities, see discussion under Biological Resources b), above. 11. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: Less Than a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral () Significant Less (✓) Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: pP g Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No residents of the State? Impact Incorporated Impact Impact services to the proposed project. To the west is a Southern California Edison transmission corridor, flood control channel and vacant land. With respect to land use composition, residential product type, building massing and building heights, the proposed mixed use project is compatible with the adjacent land uses in all directions. With the proposed Victoria Community Plan Amendment, the project will be consistent with the General Plan and will not interfere with any policies for environmental protection, or SCAG's Regional Comprehensive Plan. No adverse impacts are anticipated. C) The project site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area. According to Section 4.4 of the General Plan FPEIR, the site may contain mixed sage scrub (Riversidean Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub (RAFSS). Impacts from the proposed project are considered less than significant to vegetative communities. For a complete analysis of impact to vegetative communities, see discussion under Biological Resources b), above. 11. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral () () () (✓) resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important () () () (✓) mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local () () (✓) ( ) general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? Comments: a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure RC -2 and Table RC -1; therefore, there is no impact. b) The site is not designated by the General Plan, Figure RC -2 and Table RC -1, as a valuable mineral resource recovery site; therefore, there is no impact. 12. NOISE. Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in () (✓) () ( ) excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive () () (✓) ( ) ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels? C) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise () () (✓) ( ) levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in () (✓) () ( ) ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? Rev 3-1-16 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00451 AND DRC2016-00508 age 64 e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, () Less Than () (✓) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Pp g Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No project expose people residing or working in the Impact Incorporated Impact Impact e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (✓) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, () () () (✓) would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Comments: a) The project site is within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to General Plan Figure PS -9 at build -out. A Noise Impact Study was prepared for the project by Urban Crossroads (March 14, 2017). The report reviewed the construction and operational noise impacts related to the project. The report finds that the increase in noise levels related to the project requires the implementation of mitigation measures to reduce construction noise and road noise from Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road. Noise impacts from construction and corresponding mitigation measures are analyzed in section d) below. According to the Noise Impact Study prepared by Urban Crossroads, mitigated exterior noise levels will range from 63.8 to 64.9 dBA. With the following mitigation measures, noise impacts from roadway noise to meet the City's exterior noise standard of 65 dBA: Exterior: 1) Construct a minimum 6 -foot high noise barrier for the outdoor living areas (first floor patios) of multi -family residential con dos/town homes, and hotel rooms with first floor patios, adjacent to Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road. 2) Construct a minimum 6 -foot high noise barrier for the outdoor living areas (backyards) of the single-family residential homes adjacent to Day Creek Boulevard. 3) Prior to the issuance of any grading plans a construction -related noise mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. The Plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction. 4) Business operations shall maintain a noise level at 60d1B or less during the hours of 10 p.m. until 7 p.m. No loading and unloading activities including opening, closing, or other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials, garbage cans, or other similar objects between the hours of 10 p.m. and 7 p.m. in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to residential areas. To meet the City's 45 dBA interior noise level criteria, buildings adjacent to Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road will require a Noise Reduction (NR) of up to 26.2 dBA and a windows closed condition. This will necessitate a means of mechanical ventilation. Per the Noise Impact Study prepared by Urban Crossroads, in order to meet the City's 45 dBA Rev 3-1-16 P670 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00451 AND DRC2016-00508 age 65 interior noise standards, the project shall provide the following or equivalent noise mitigation measures: Interior: 5) Windows: All windows and sliding glass doors shall be well fitted, well weather-stripped assemblies and shall have the following minimum sound transmission class (STC) ratings: Upgraded first, second, and third floor windows with a minimum STC rating of 30 are required for residential (single - and multi -family), hotel, and commercial buildings adjacent to Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road. All other buildings require standard windows with a minimum STC rating of 27. 6) Doors: All exterior doors shall be well weather-stripped solid core assemblies at least one and three -fourths -inch thick. 7) Walls: At any penetrations of exterior walls by pipes, ducts, or conduits, the space between the wall and pipes, ducts, or conduits shall be caulked or filled with mortar to form an airtight seal. 8) Roof: Roof sheathing of wood construction shall be well fitted or caulked plywood of at least one half inch thick. Ceilings shall be well fitted, fully sealed gypsum board of at least one-half inch thick. Insulation with at least a rating of R-19 shall be used in the attic space. 9) Attic: Attic vents should be oriented away from Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road. If such an orientation cannot be avoided, then an acoustical baffle shall be placed in the attic space behind the vents. 10) Ventilation: Arrangements for any habitable room shall be such that any exterior door or window can be kept closed when the room is in use and still receive circulated air. A forced air circulation system (e.g. air conditioning) or active ventilation system (e.g. fresh air supply) shall be provided which satisfies the requirements of the Uniform Building Code. b) Operational Noise: According to the Noise Impact Study prepared by Urban Crossroads, using reference noise levels to represent the potential noise sources with the project site, the Noise Impact Study estimates the project related operational (stationary source) noise levels at the nearby noise sensitive locations. The project related operational noise sources are expected to include the following: roof -top air conditioning units and parking lot vehicle movement activities. The analysis shows that the project related operational noise levels will meet the City's standards at the off-site receiver locations in the project study area. Additionally, the project will not contribute an operational noise level impact to the existing ambient noise environment at any of the nearby sensitive receiver locations. Therefore, the operational noise level impacts associated with the proposed project activities, such as roof -top air conditioning units and parking lot vehicle movement activities, will be less than significant. Construction vibrations: The normal operating uses associated with this type of project (hotels, restaurants and residential dwelling units) normally do not induce ground borne Rev 3-1-16 P671 Less Than Significant Less and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation ThanIssues Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact impact interior noise standards, the project shall provide the following or equivalent noise mitigation measures: Interior: 5) Windows: All windows and sliding glass doors shall be well fitted, well weather-stripped assemblies and shall have the following minimum sound transmission class (STC) ratings: Upgraded first, second, and third floor windows with a minimum STC rating of 30 are required for residential (single - and multi -family), hotel, and commercial buildings adjacent to Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road. All other buildings require standard windows with a minimum STC rating of 27. 6) Doors: All exterior doors shall be well weather-stripped solid core assemblies at least one and three -fourths -inch thick. 7) Walls: At any penetrations of exterior walls by pipes, ducts, or conduits, the space between the wall and pipes, ducts, or conduits shall be caulked or filled with mortar to form an airtight seal. 8) Roof: Roof sheathing of wood construction shall be well fitted or caulked plywood of at least one half inch thick. Ceilings shall be well fitted, fully sealed gypsum board of at least one-half inch thick. Insulation with at least a rating of R-19 shall be used in the attic space. 9) Attic: Attic vents should be oriented away from Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road. If such an orientation cannot be avoided, then an acoustical baffle shall be placed in the attic space behind the vents. 10) Ventilation: Arrangements for any habitable room shall be such that any exterior door or window can be kept closed when the room is in use and still receive circulated air. A forced air circulation system (e.g. air conditioning) or active ventilation system (e.g. fresh air supply) shall be provided which satisfies the requirements of the Uniform Building Code. b) Operational Noise: According to the Noise Impact Study prepared by Urban Crossroads, using reference noise levels to represent the potential noise sources with the project site, the Noise Impact Study estimates the project related operational (stationary source) noise levels at the nearby noise sensitive locations. The project related operational noise sources are expected to include the following: roof -top air conditioning units and parking lot vehicle movement activities. The analysis shows that the project related operational noise levels will meet the City's standards at the off-site receiver locations in the project study area. Additionally, the project will not contribute an operational noise level impact to the existing ambient noise environment at any of the nearby sensitive receiver locations. Therefore, the operational noise level impacts associated with the proposed project activities, such as roof -top air conditioning units and parking lot vehicle movement activities, will be less than significant. Construction vibrations: The normal operating uses associated with this type of project (hotels, restaurants and residential dwelling units) normally do not induce ground borne Rev 3-1-16 P671 P672 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00451 AND DRC2016-00508 Page 66 vibrations. Regarding construction vibrations, a Noise Impact Study was prepared for the project by Urban Crossroads (July 19, 2016). Construction activity can result in varying degrees of ground vibration, depending on the equipment and methods used, distance to the affected structures and soil type. It is expected that ground -borne vibration from the project construction activities would cause only intermittent, localized intrusion. Based on the reference vibration levels provided by the Federal Transit Administration (FTA), a large bulldozer represents the peak source of vibration with a reference velocity of 0.089 in/sec Peak Particle Velocity (PPV) at a distance of 25 feet. At distances ranging from 85 to 887 feet from the project site, construction vibration velocity levels are expected to approach 0.014 in/sec PPV. Based on the City of Rancho Cucamonga vibration standards, the proposed project construction activities will exceed the vibration standard of 0.010 in sec RMS at receiver location R4 during project construction (Table 11-9 from Noise Impact Study). However, these vibration standards are applicable to permanent uses, as the City's Development Code exempts temporary construction activities from this standard. Therefore, the project -related vibration impacts at receiver location R4 represent a temporary, worse -case scenario during grading operations (large bulldozer) at the project site boundary. Since construction operations are temporary and potential vibration impacts from bulldozers would occur intermittently when earthmoving operations occur only equipment is passing at close range near the south project boundary, the impact is considered less than significant. Construction vibration on buildings: The vibration impacts due to project construction represent temporary perceptible vibration levels which may cause annoyance in residential areas; however, they do not represent vibration levels capable of causing building damage to nearby residential homes. The peak project construction levels will not exceed the FTA vibration levels for building damage for residential homes near the project site. Further, the impacts at the site of the closest sensitive receivers are unlikely to be sustained during the entire construction period, but will occur only during the times that heavy construction equipment is operating adjacent to the project site perimeter. As noted above, the City's Development Code exempts temporary construction activities from this standard. The impact is considered less than significant. C) The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic. According to the Noise Impact Study prepared by Urban Crossroads (May 23, 2016), traffic generated by the proposed project will influence the traffic noise levels in surrounding offsite areas. To quantify the off-site traffic noise increases on the surrounding off-site areas, the changes in traffic noise levels on 12 roadway segments surrounding the Project site were estimated based on the change in the average daily traffic (ADT) volumes. The traffic noise levels provided in the Noise Impact Study prepared by Urban Crossroads were based on the traffic forecasts found in the Day Creek Villages Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by Urban Crossroads (July 19, 2016). To assess the off-site noise level impacts associated with the proposed Project, noise contour boundaries were developed for Existing, Opening Year 2020, and Horizon Year 2040 conditions for both the with and without project traffic conditions. In sum, the off-site traffic noise analysis shows that the project noise level contributions will be less than significant under all with project scenarios, including: Existing, Opening Year 2020, and Horizon Year 2040 conditions. d) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.12) indicates that during a construction phase, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction equipment, will generate noise exceeding City standard Construction noise represents a short-term Rev 3-1-16 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: pp g Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact vibrations. Regarding construction vibrations, a Noise Impact Study was prepared for the project by Urban Crossroads (July 19, 2016). Construction activity can result in varying degrees of ground vibration, depending on the equipment and methods used, distance to the affected structures and soil type. It is expected that ground -borne vibration from the project construction activities would cause only intermittent, localized intrusion. Based on the reference vibration levels provided by the Federal Transit Administration (FTA), a large bulldozer represents the peak source of vibration with a reference velocity of 0.089 in/sec Peak Particle Velocity (PPV) at a distance of 25 feet. At distances ranging from 85 to 887 feet from the project site, construction vibration velocity levels are expected to approach 0.014 in/sec PPV. Based on the City of Rancho Cucamonga vibration standards, the proposed project construction activities will exceed the vibration standard of 0.010 in sec RMS at receiver location R4 during project construction (Table 11-9 from Noise Impact Study). However, these vibration standards are applicable to permanent uses, as the City's Development Code exempts temporary construction activities from this standard. Therefore, the project -related vibration impacts at receiver location R4 represent a temporary, worse -case scenario during grading operations (large bulldozer) at the project site boundary. Since construction operations are temporary and potential vibration impacts from bulldozers would occur intermittently when earthmoving operations occur only equipment is passing at close range near the south project boundary, the impact is considered less than significant. Construction vibration on buildings: The vibration impacts due to project construction represent temporary perceptible vibration levels which may cause annoyance in residential areas; however, they do not represent vibration levels capable of causing building damage to nearby residential homes. The peak project construction levels will not exceed the FTA vibration levels for building damage for residential homes near the project site. Further, the impacts at the site of the closest sensitive receivers are unlikely to be sustained during the entire construction period, but will occur only during the times that heavy construction equipment is operating adjacent to the project site perimeter. As noted above, the City's Development Code exempts temporary construction activities from this standard. The impact is considered less than significant. C) The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic. According to the Noise Impact Study prepared by Urban Crossroads (May 23, 2016), traffic generated by the proposed project will influence the traffic noise levels in surrounding offsite areas. To quantify the off-site traffic noise increases on the surrounding off-site areas, the changes in traffic noise levels on 12 roadway segments surrounding the Project site were estimated based on the change in the average daily traffic (ADT) volumes. The traffic noise levels provided in the Noise Impact Study prepared by Urban Crossroads were based on the traffic forecasts found in the Day Creek Villages Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by Urban Crossroads (July 19, 2016). To assess the off-site noise level impacts associated with the proposed Project, noise contour boundaries were developed for Existing, Opening Year 2020, and Horizon Year 2040 conditions for both the with and without project traffic conditions. In sum, the off-site traffic noise analysis shows that the project noise level contributions will be less than significant under all with project scenarios, including: Existing, Opening Year 2020, and Horizon Year 2040 conditions. d) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.12) indicates that during a construction phase, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction equipment, will generate noise exceeding City standard Construction noise represents a short-term Rev 3-1-16 P673 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00451 AND DRC2016-00508 age 67 increase on the ambient noise levels. Construction -related noise impacts are expected to create temporary and intermittent high-level noise conditions at receivers surrounding the Project site when certain activities occur at the Project site boundary. According to the Noise Impact Study prepared by Urban Crossroads (July 19, 2016), the Project -related short-term construction noise levels (unmitigated) are expected to approach 72.3 dBA Leq near the south boundary of the project site from construction equipment during grading operations. These noise levels will require mitigation (temporary construction barriers), and with mitigation will the noise levels will not the 65 dBA Leq threshold. TABLE 11-8: MITIGATED CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT NOISE LEVEL SUMMARY (DBA LEQ) Construction Noise Levels Less Than Const. With Temporary Noise Barriers (dBA Leq) Significant Less Issues and SU ortin Information Sources. pp g Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact increase on the ambient noise levels. Construction -related noise impacts are expected to create temporary and intermittent high-level noise conditions at receivers surrounding the Project site when certain activities occur at the Project site boundary. According to the Noise Impact Study prepared by Urban Crossroads (July 19, 2016), the Project -related short-term construction noise levels (unmitigated) are expected to approach 72.3 dBA Leq near the south boundary of the project site from construction equipment during grading operations. These noise levels will require mitigation (temporary construction barriers), and with mitigation will the noise levels will not the 65 dBA Leq threshold. TABLE 11-8: MITIGATED CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT NOISE LEVEL SUMMARY (DBA LEQ) ' Noise receiver locations are shown on Exhibit 11-A. 2 Estimated construction noise levels during peak operating conditions, as shown on Table 11-7. 3 Construction noise level threshold as shown on Table 4-2. Do the estimated Project construction noise levels meet the construction noise level thresholds? 5 Construction noise levels without the existing barrier attenuation for location R4 are used to determine the temporary construction noise barrier height required to satisfy the construction noise level threshold. 6 Peak construction noise levels with the temporary construction noise barriers as shown on Exhibit it -A. Temporary barrier attenuation calculations are provided in Appendix 11.1. With the recommended temporary noise barriers for construction activity, noise levels would be reduced to and the impact is considered less than significant. Though construction noise is temporary, intermittent and of short duration, and will not present any long-term impacts, the following mitigation measures will reduce the short term construction noise levels to a level less than significant. Rev 3-1-16 Construction Noise Levels (dBA Leq) Const. With Temporary Noise Barriers (dBA Leq) Noise Receiver Level Temporary Location 1 Peak Threshold' Threshold Without Barrier Construction Attenuation Threshold Activity2 Exceeded?" Existing Height Noise Levels6 Exceeded?4 Barriers (Feet) R1 49.1 65 No - - - - No R2 57.5 65 No - - - - No R3 62.7 65 No - - - - No R4 72.3 65 Yes 75.0 12' -10.3 64.7 No R5 49.5 65 No - - - - No ' Noise receiver locations are shown on Exhibit 11-A. 2 Estimated construction noise levels during peak operating conditions, as shown on Table 11-7. 3 Construction noise level threshold as shown on Table 4-2. Do the estimated Project construction noise levels meet the construction noise level thresholds? 5 Construction noise levels without the existing barrier attenuation for location R4 are used to determine the temporary construction noise barrier height required to satisfy the construction noise level threshold. 6 Peak construction noise levels with the temporary construction noise barriers as shown on Exhibit it -A. Temporary barrier attenuation calculations are provided in Appendix 11.1. With the recommended temporary noise barriers for construction activity, noise levels would be reduced to and the impact is considered less than significant. Though construction noise is temporary, intermittent and of short duration, and will not present any long-term impacts, the following mitigation measures will reduce the short term construction noise levels to a level less than significant. Rev 3-1-16 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00451 AND DRC2016-00508 Page 68 11) Prior to approval of grading plans and/or issuance of building permits, plans shall include a note indicating that noise -generating project construction activities shall only occur between the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. on weekdays, including on Saturdays, with no activity allowed on Sundays and holidays. 12) Install minimum 12 -foot high temporary construction noise barriers at the southern Project site boundary, as shown on Exhibit 11-A of the Noise Impact Analysis for the duration of construction activities at the project site. The noise control barriers must present a solid face from top to bottom. The noise control barrier must meet the minimum heights shown on Exhibit 11-A. • The barrier shall provide a weight of at least 4 pounds per square foot of face area with no decorative cutouts or line -of -sight openings between shielded areas and the noise source. The noise barrier shall be constructed using one of the following materials: c An acoustical blanket (e.g. vinyl acoustic curtains or quilted blankets) attached to the construction site perimeter fence or equivalent temporary fence posts; c Masonry block; o Stucco veneer over wood framing (or foam core), or 1 -inch thick tongue and groove wood of sufficient weight per square foot; Glass (1/4 inch thick), or other transparent material with sufficient weight per square foot; o Earthen berm; o Any combination of these construction materials satisfying a weight of at least 4 pounds per square foot of face area. • The noise barriers must be maintained and any damage promptly repaired. Gaps, holes, or weaknesses in the barrier or openings between the barrier and the ground shall be promptly repaired. • The noise control barriers and associated elements shall be completely removed and the site appropriately restored upon the conclusion of the construction activity. • During all Project site construction, the construction contractors shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers, consistent with manufacturers' standards. The construction contractor shall place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from the noise sensitive receptors nearest the project site. • The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction -related noise sources and noise -sensitive receivers nearest the project site (i.e., to the center) during all Project construction. Rev 3-1-16 P674 Less Than Significant Less and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation ThanIssues Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Im ad 11) Prior to approval of grading plans and/or issuance of building permits, plans shall include a note indicating that noise -generating project construction activities shall only occur between the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. on weekdays, including on Saturdays, with no activity allowed on Sundays and holidays. 12) Install minimum 12 -foot high temporary construction noise barriers at the southern Project site boundary, as shown on Exhibit 11-A of the Noise Impact Analysis for the duration of construction activities at the project site. The noise control barriers must present a solid face from top to bottom. The noise control barrier must meet the minimum heights shown on Exhibit 11-A. • The barrier shall provide a weight of at least 4 pounds per square foot of face area with no decorative cutouts or line -of -sight openings between shielded areas and the noise source. The noise barrier shall be constructed using one of the following materials: c An acoustical blanket (e.g. vinyl acoustic curtains or quilted blankets) attached to the construction site perimeter fence or equivalent temporary fence posts; c Masonry block; o Stucco veneer over wood framing (or foam core), or 1 -inch thick tongue and groove wood of sufficient weight per square foot; Glass (1/4 inch thick), or other transparent material with sufficient weight per square foot; o Earthen berm; o Any combination of these construction materials satisfying a weight of at least 4 pounds per square foot of face area. • The noise barriers must be maintained and any damage promptly repaired. Gaps, holes, or weaknesses in the barrier or openings between the barrier and the ground shall be promptly repaired. • The noise control barriers and associated elements shall be completely removed and the site appropriately restored upon the conclusion of the construction activity. • During all Project site construction, the construction contractors shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers, consistent with manufacturers' standards. The construction contractor shall place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from the noise sensitive receptors nearest the project site. • The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction -related noise sources and noise -sensitive receivers nearest the project site (i.e., to the center) during all Project construction. Rev 3-1-16 P674 P675 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00451 AND DRC2016-00508 Page 69 • The construction contractor shall limit haul truck deliveries to the same hours specified for construction equipment (between the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. on weekdays, including on Saturdays, with no activity allowed on Sundays and holidays). The contractor shall prepare a haul route exhibit and shall design delivery routes to minimize the exposure of sensitive land uses or residential dwellings to delivery truck -related noise. 13) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 14) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase. e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport. The project site is located approximately 4.5 northeasterly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. The project is outside the Airport Influence Area of the Ontario Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan; therefore, no impact is anticipated. f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2.5 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated. 13. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: Less Than a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either ( ) Significant Less (✓) Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: pp g Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant N businesses) or indirectly (for example, through Impact Incorporated Impact 1: a. t • The construction contractor shall limit haul truck deliveries to the same hours specified for construction equipment (between the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. on weekdays, including on Saturdays, with no activity allowed on Sundays and holidays). The contractor shall prepare a haul route exhibit and shall design delivery routes to minimize the exposure of sensitive land uses or residential dwellings to delivery truck -related noise. 13) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 14) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase. e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport. The project site is located approximately 4.5 northeasterly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. The project is outside the Airport Influence Area of the Ontario Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan; therefore, no impact is anticipated. f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2.5 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated. 13. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either ( ) () () (✓) directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, ( ) () () (✓) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? C) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating ( ) () () (✓) the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Comments: a) The project is located in a predominantly developed area and will include the construction of 51 single family homes and 329 townhomes. Although the project will increase the population growth in the area there will be a less than significant impact as the project and land use (Mixed Use) is consistent with the General Plan Designation and for which a FPEIR was prepared and certified in 2010. The density was analyzed as part of the build out in the General Plan FPEIR. Construction activities at the site will be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area. Regarding the commercial uses, once Rev 3-1-16 P676 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00451 AND DRC2016-00508 Page 70 constructed, the proposed project will have a limited number of employees; hence, the project will not create a demand for additional housing as a majority of the employees will likely be hired from within the City or surrounding communities. No significant impacts are anticipated. b) The project site is vacant and contains no existing housing units. Because the property is vacant there will be no displacement of housing or people. Therefore, no adverse impact is expected. C) The project site is vacant and contains no existing housing units. Because the property is vacant and contains no existing housing units that will be demolished, there will be no displacement of housing or people. Therefore, no adverse impact is expected. 14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial Less Than adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: P Significant am ant With Mitigation Than Significant No physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of Impact Incor orated Im acl Im act constructed, the proposed project will have a limited number of employees; hence, the project will not create a demand for additional housing as a majority of the employees will likely be hired from within the City or surrounding communities. No significant impacts are anticipated. b) The project site is vacant and contains no existing housing units. Because the property is vacant there will be no displacement of housing or people. Therefore, no adverse impact is expected. C) The project site is vacant and contains no existing housing units. Because the property is vacant and contains no existing housing units that will be demolished, there will be no displacement of housing or people. Therefore, no adverse impact is expected. 14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: a) Fire protection? () () (✓) ( ) b) Police protection? () () (✓ ( ) C) Schools? () (✓) () ( ) d) Parks? () () (✓) ( ) e) Other public facilities? () () () (✓) Comments: a) The site, located at the southwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road, would be served by Fire Station 173, located at 12270 Firehouse Court approximately '/2 mile to the north of the project site. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the project to lessen the future demand and impacts to fire services. The impact is considered less than significant. b) The increase in residential units may lead to an increase in calls for service. Although there may be an increase in calls, additional police protection is not required as the addition of the project will not change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled as the project site is within an area that is regularly patrolled. The San Bernardino County Sheriffs Department, which provides police services to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, has reviewed the project and has concluded that the project will not result in a significant impact or a need to construct additional police facilities. The impact is considered less than significant. C) The Etiwanda School District and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District serve the project area. Both school districts have been notified regarding the proposed Rev 3-1-16 P677 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00451 AND DRC2016-00508 Page 71 development. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay the school impact fees. The Etiwanda School District submitted correspondence requiring payment of the school facility fee plus the Etiwanda School District special tax as mitigation to school facilities impacts. With this standard condition and mitigation indicated below, impacts to the School Districts are considered less than significant. 1) The developer shall pay the current residential school facility fee plus the Etiwanda School District special tax. d) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park, Victoria Arbors Park, is located at 7429 Arbor Lane 1 mile to the east of the project site. The project is proposing the construction of 380 residential units (and a 71 room hotel and two 6,000 square foot restaurants) which will increase park usage; however, the increase in park usage can be absorbed by the existing parks in the immediate area (5 total) and is considered less than significant. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees. Additionally, the project includes the construction of a 0.73 acre pocket park that will be accessible to the public, but privately maintained. The pocket park will include the following amenities: volleyball/badminton areas, shaded areas with game tables, benches and two bocce balls courts. The project is designed with low -intensity active and passive recreational amenities which will mitigate a portion of the demand on public park usage. With the construction of the publicly accessible linear park and payment of Park Development Fees, the impact is considered less than significant. e) The proposed project will utilize existing public facilities. The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services. According to the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.14), there will be a projected increase in library space demand but with the implementation of standard conditions the increase in Library Services would be mitigated to less than significant impact. Additionally, the closest public library, the Paul A. Biane Library, located at 12505 Cultural Center Drive, recently completed a second floor addition that added 13,500 square feet of specialized programming space. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. Therefore no adverse impact is expected. Rev 3-1-16 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g es Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact development. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay the school impact fees. The Etiwanda School District submitted correspondence requiring payment of the school facility fee plus the Etiwanda School District special tax as mitigation to school facilities impacts. With this standard condition and mitigation indicated below, impacts to the School Districts are considered less than significant. 1) The developer shall pay the current residential school facility fee plus the Etiwanda School District special tax. d) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park, Victoria Arbors Park, is located at 7429 Arbor Lane 1 mile to the east of the project site. The project is proposing the construction of 380 residential units (and a 71 room hotel and two 6,000 square foot restaurants) which will increase park usage; however, the increase in park usage can be absorbed by the existing parks in the immediate area (5 total) and is considered less than significant. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees. Additionally, the project includes the construction of a 0.73 acre pocket park that will be accessible to the public, but privately maintained. The pocket park will include the following amenities: volleyball/badminton areas, shaded areas with game tables, benches and two bocce balls courts. The project is designed with low -intensity active and passive recreational amenities which will mitigate a portion of the demand on public park usage. With the construction of the publicly accessible linear park and payment of Park Development Fees, the impact is considered less than significant. e) The proposed project will utilize existing public facilities. The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services. According to the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.14), there will be a projected increase in library space demand but with the implementation of standard conditions the increase in Library Services would be mitigated to less than significant impact. Additionally, the closest public library, the Paul A. Biane Library, located at 12505 Cultural Center Drive, recently completed a second floor addition that added 13,500 square feet of specialized programming space. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. Therefore no adverse impact is expected. Rev 3-1-16 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00451 AND DRC2016-00508 Page 72 15. RECREATION. Would the project: Less Than a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and ( ) Significant Less ( ) and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation ThanIssues Significant No substantial physical deterioration of the facility would Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 15. RECREATION. Would the project: a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and ( ) () (✓) ( ) regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or ( ) () (✓) ( ) require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Comments: a) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park, Victoria Arbors Park, is located at 7429 Arbor Lane approximately 1 mile to the east of the project site. The project will not require the construction of any new park facilities or alteration of any existing park facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new park facilities. The project is proposing the construction of 380 residential units (and a 71 room hotel and two 6,000 square foot restaurants) which will increase park usage; however, the increase in park usage can be absorbed by the existing neighborhood parks in the immediate area (5 total) and is considered less than significant. 3 Rev 3-1-16 Additionally, the project includes the construction of a 0.73 acre pocket park that will be accessible to the public, but privately maintained. The pocket park will include the following amenities: volleyball/badminton areas, shaded areas with game tables, benches and two bocce balls courts. The project is designed with low -intensity active and passive recreational amenities which will mitigate a portion of the demand on public park usage. The construction of the pocket park will not remove any sensitive habitat (see discussion under Biological Resources above) cause any negative impacts on the environment, such as glare (see discussion under Aesthetics above), or cause any additional traffic trips since pocket park is designed to serve adjacent land uses by pedestrian and bicycle accessibility as the park does not contain a parking lot. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees. The impact is considered less than significant. See a) response above. P678 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00451 AND DRC2016-00508 Page 73 16. TRANSPORTATIONITRAFFIC. Would the project: Less Than a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy () Significant Less (✓) and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation ThanIssues Significant No performance of the circulation system, taking into Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 16. TRANSPORTATIONITRAFFIC. Would the project: a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy () (✓) () (✓) establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non -motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management () (✓) () ( ) program, including, but not limited to a level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? C) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including ( ) () () (✓) either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that result in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature ( ) () () (✓) (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? () () () (✓) f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs () () () (✓) regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities. Comments: a) The applicant proposes developing the 28.4 acre site located at the southwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road with mixed use project consisting of single- family and townhome residential units, a boutique hotel and two restaurant pads. Of the 28.4 acres, 24.9 will be allocated to the residential portion of the site, and 3.5 acres will be allocated to the two restaurant pads and hotel site. The project breakdown is the following: 380 residential units (51 single-family dwelling units and 329 townhomes), two restaurant pads for 12,000 square feet of restaurant use (two 6,000 square foot buildings) and a 71 room hotel. A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) was prepared by Urban Crossroads (April 21, 2017). The TIA was performed in consultation with the City and follows the County of San Bernardino Congestion Management Plan (CMP) and California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) requirements. The TIA was based upon the following parameters: 1) the project will be developed in a single phase with an opening year of 2020 and 2) access to the project will be provided via three driveways. Driveway 1 will be on Base Line Road (full access with a proposed traffic signal); Driveway 2 on Day Creek Boulevard (right in/right out only); and Driveway 3 on Day Creek Boulevard (full access via an existing traffic signal at Madrigal Place). The TIA utilizes trip generation statistics published in the Rev 3-1-16 P679 P680 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00451 AND DRC2016-00508 Page 74 Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation (91h edition, 2012) manual for single-family detached residential (ITE Land Use Code 210), condo/townhomes (ITE Land Use Code 230), hotel (ITE Land Use Code 310), and high turnover (sit-down) restaurant (ITE Land Use Code 932). As the project is proposed to include land uses which attract pass -by trips, pass -by percentages were obtained from Tables ITE Trip Generation Handbook (3rd Edition, 2014) for each of the applicable uses. As the trip generation for the site was conservatively estimated based on individual land uses, an internal capture reduction was applied to recognize the interactions that would occur between the onsite complimentary land uses. For example, patrons of the hotel may also dine at the restaurant, without leaving the site. The project is estimated to generate a net total of approximately 3,356 net trip -ends per day on a typical weekday with 315 net vehicles per hour (VPH) during the weekday AM peak hour and 299 net VPH during the weekday PM peak (Table 4-2). TABLE 4-2 Land Use Quantity Units2 AM Peak Hour In Out Total Less Than Daily Single Family Detached Residential 51 DU 10 29 Significant Less 19 and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation ThanIssues Significant No 145 Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation (91h edition, 2012) manual for single-family detached residential (ITE Land Use Code 210), condo/townhomes (ITE Land Use Code 230), hotel (ITE Land Use Code 310), and high turnover (sit-down) restaurant (ITE Land Use Code 932). As the project is proposed to include land uses which attract pass -by trips, pass -by percentages were obtained from Tables ITE Trip Generation Handbook (3rd Edition, 2014) for each of the applicable uses. As the trip generation for the site was conservatively estimated based on individual land uses, an internal capture reduction was applied to recognize the interactions that would occur between the onsite complimentary land uses. For example, patrons of the hotel may also dine at the restaurant, without leaving the site. The project is estimated to generate a net total of approximately 3,356 net trip -ends per day on a typical weekday with 315 net vehicles per hour (VPH) during the weekday AM peak hour and 299 net VPH during the weekday PM peak (Table 4-2). TABLE 4-2 Land Use Quantity Units2 AM Peak Hour In Out Total PM Peak Hour In Out Total Daily Single Family Detached Residential 51 DU 10 29 38 32 19 51 486 Condo/Townhomes 329 DU 23 122 145 115 56 171 1,911 Residential Subtotal: 33 151 184 147 75 222 2,397 Internal Capture (Residential to Restaurant)": -2 -14 -16 -8 -10 -18 -194 Internal Capture (Residential to Hotel):: 0 0 0 0 -2 -2 -22 Net Residential Trips: 31 137 168 139 63 202 2,181 Hotel 7 71 1 RM 22 16 38 22 21 43 580 Internal Capture (Hotel to Restaurant) : -1 -1 -2 -3 -4 -7 -91 Internal Capture (Hotel to Residential) : 0 0 0 -2 0 -2 -22 Net Hotel Trips: 21 15 36 17 17 34 468 High Turnover (Sit -Down) Restaurant 1 12.000 1 TSF 71 58 129 71 47 118 1,526 Internal Capture (Restaurant to Residential) : -14 -2 -16 -10 -8 -18 -194 Internal Capture (Restaurant to Hotel):: -1 -1 -2 -4 -3 -7 -91 5ubtotal: 56 55 111 57 36 1 93 1,241 Rev 3-1-16 P681 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00451 AND DRC2016-00508 Paae 75 Pass -by Reduction: (43% PM) : 0 0 0 -15 -15 -30 -534 Net Restaurant Trips: 56 55 111 42 21 63 707 TOTAL NET TRIPS: 108 207 315 198 101 299 3,356 11 P UCI1-auun . —1— 111xnuLa unanoNunauun u16 11-3 ti 1 Wit, i nu vcnci — —ol.uai, rvnun �uu�un tcuic�. Z TSF = Thousand Square Feet; DU = Dwelling units; RM = Rooms 3 Internal capture calculated from NCHRP 684 Internal Trip Capture Estimation Tool. " Pass -by reduction percentages are from the ITETrio Generation Handbook (3rd Edition): Table F.30 In order to provide a comprehensive analysis of potential traffic impacts, the TIA prepared by Urban Crossroads, impacts to circulation were assessed for each of the following conditions: • Existing (2016) (Baseline) • Existing plus Project (E+P) Conditions • Opening Year Cumulative (2020) Without Project Conditions • Opening Year Cumulative (2020) With Project Conditions • Horizon Year (2040) Without Project Conditions • Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions To account for background traffic growth, traffic associated with other known cumulative development projects in conjunction with an ambient growth from Existing (2016) conditions of 8.24% (2 percent per year over 4 years, compounded annually) is included for Opening Year Cumulative traffic conditions. The TIA studied 12 intersections (see Table 1-1), trip generation and trip distribution. TABLE 1-1: Intersection Analysis Locations ID Intersection Location Less Than 1 Dw . 1 / Base Line Rd. Rancho Cucamonga 2 Significant Less 3 Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No 5 Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Pass -by Reduction: (43% PM) : 0 0 0 -15 -15 -30 -534 Net Restaurant Trips: 56 55 111 42 21 63 707 TOTAL NET TRIPS: 108 207 315 198 101 299 3,356 11 P UCI1-auun . —1— 111xnuLa unanoNunauun u16 11-3 ti 1 Wit, i nu vcnci — —ol.uai, rvnun �uu�un tcuic�. Z TSF = Thousand Square Feet; DU = Dwelling units; RM = Rooms 3 Internal capture calculated from NCHRP 684 Internal Trip Capture Estimation Tool. " Pass -by reduction percentages are from the ITETrio Generation Handbook (3rd Edition): Table F.30 In order to provide a comprehensive analysis of potential traffic impacts, the TIA prepared by Urban Crossroads, impacts to circulation were assessed for each of the following conditions: • Existing (2016) (Baseline) • Existing plus Project (E+P) Conditions • Opening Year Cumulative (2020) Without Project Conditions • Opening Year Cumulative (2020) With Project Conditions • Horizon Year (2040) Without Project Conditions • Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions To account for background traffic growth, traffic associated with other known cumulative development projects in conjunction with an ambient growth from Existing (2016) conditions of 8.24% (2 percent per year over 4 years, compounded annually) is included for Opening Year Cumulative traffic conditions. The TIA studied 12 intersections (see Table 1-1), trip generation and trip distribution. TABLE 1-1: Intersection Analysis Locations ID Intersection Location Jurisdiction 1 Dw . 1 / Base Line Rd. Rancho Cucamonga 2 Day Creek BI. / Victoria Park Ln. Rancho Cucamonga 3 Day Creek BI. / Base Line Rd. Rancho Cucamonga 4 Day Creek BI. / Dw . 2 Rancho Cucamonga 5 Day Creek BI. / Dw . 3/Madrigal PI. Rancho Cucamonga 6 Day Creek BI. / Church St. Rancho Cucamonga 7 Day Creek BI. / E. Foothill BI. Rancho Cucamonga 8 Victoria Park Ln. / Base Line Rd. Rancho Cucamonga 9 Etiwanda Av. / Base Line Rd. Rancho Cucamonga 10 1-15 SB Ramps / Base Line Rd. Rancho Cucamonga, 11 East Av. / Base Line Rd. Rancho Cucamonga, 12 1-15 NB Ramps / Base Line Rd. Fontana, Caltrans Rev 3-1-16 P682 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00451 AND DRC2016-00508 Page 76 The TIA prepared by Urban Crossroads (March 14, 2017) reviewed the cumulative impacts on the study area intersections and recommends mitigation measures to address cumulatively significant impacts. Project Impacts Impact 1.1 — Day Creek BI. / E. Foothill BI. (#7) — Although this intersection was found to operate at an unacceptable LOS (LOS F) during the PM peak hour only under existing traffic conditions, the intersection is anticipated to continue to operate at unacceptable levels during one or more of the peak hours with the addition of project traffic. As such, the impact is cumulatively considerable (Impact 1.1). Impact 2.1 — East Av. / Base Line Rd. (#11) — Although this intersection was found to operate at an unacceptable LOS (LOS E) during the AM peak hour only under existing traffic conditions, the intersection is anticipated to continue to operate at unacceptable levels during one or more of the peak hours with the addition of project traffic. As such, the impact is cumulatively considerable (Impact 2.1). Mitigation Measures Mitigation Measure 1.1 — Day Creek BI. / E. Foothill BI. (#7) — The following improvement is necessary to improve the intersection operations to better than pre -Project levels during the peak hours, thus reducing the cumulative impact to less than significant: Project to restripe rightmost northbound through lane as a shared through -right turn lane and adjust signal timing splits. Due to existing geometrics and the need to accommodate all modes (i.e., pedestrians and bicycles), it is not feasible to improve the vehicular LOS to LOS D. However, with the above mitigation, the delay is reduced to less than pre -Project levels as shown in Table 7- 5. Table 7-5: Intersection Analysis for Horizon Year 2040 Conditions with Improvements Less Than Intersection Ap oach Lanes Delay Level of Significant Less Eastbound Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: Pp g Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Service Impact Incorporated Impact Impact The TIA prepared by Urban Crossroads (March 14, 2017) reviewed the cumulative impacts on the study area intersections and recommends mitigation measures to address cumulatively significant impacts. Project Impacts Impact 1.1 — Day Creek BI. / E. Foothill BI. (#7) — Although this intersection was found to operate at an unacceptable LOS (LOS F) during the PM peak hour only under existing traffic conditions, the intersection is anticipated to continue to operate at unacceptable levels during one or more of the peak hours with the addition of project traffic. As such, the impact is cumulatively considerable (Impact 1.1). Impact 2.1 — East Av. / Base Line Rd. (#11) — Although this intersection was found to operate at an unacceptable LOS (LOS E) during the AM peak hour only under existing traffic conditions, the intersection is anticipated to continue to operate at unacceptable levels during one or more of the peak hours with the addition of project traffic. As such, the impact is cumulatively considerable (Impact 2.1). Mitigation Measures Mitigation Measure 1.1 — Day Creek BI. / E. Foothill BI. (#7) — The following improvement is necessary to improve the intersection operations to better than pre -Project levels during the peak hours, thus reducing the cumulative impact to less than significant: Project to restripe rightmost northbound through lane as a shared through -right turn lane and adjust signal timing splits. Due to existing geometrics and the need to accommodate all modes (i.e., pedestrians and bicycles), it is not feasible to improve the vehicular LOS to LOS D. However, with the above mitigation, the delay is reduced to less than pre -Project levels as shown in Table 7- 5. Table 7-5: Intersection Analysis for Horizon Year 2040 Conditions with Improvements 1 When a right turn is designated, the lane can either be striped or unstriped. To function as a right turn lane there must be sufficient width for right turning vehicles to travel outside the through lanes. L = Left; T = Through; R = Right; > = Right -Turn Overlap Phasing; >> = Free -Right Turn Lane; 1= Improvement 2 Per the 2010 Highway Capacity Manual, overall average intersection delay and level of service are shown for Rev 3-1-16 Intersection Ap oach Lanes Delay Level of Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Traffic sea. Service significant # Intersection Contro13 Impact? L T R L T R L T R L T R AM I PM AM PM 7 Day Creek BI. / E. Foothill BI. 2040 Without Project: TS 2 3 1 2 2 1>> 2 4 0 2 3 1>> 107.3 445.0 F F 2040 With Project: - Without Improvements TS 2 3 1 2 2 1>> 2 4 0 2 3 1>> 111.4 480.4 F F Yes - With Mitigation' TS 2 2.5 1.5 1 2 2 1>> 2 4 0 1 2 3 1>> 88.3 369.0 1 F I F No 1 When a right turn is designated, the lane can either be striped or unstriped. To function as a right turn lane there must be sufficient width for right turning vehicles to travel outside the through lanes. L = Left; T = Through; R = Right; > = Right -Turn Overlap Phasing; >> = Free -Right Turn Lane; 1= Improvement 2 Per the 2010 Highway Capacity Manual, overall average intersection delay and level of service are shown for Rev 3-1-16 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00451 AND DRC2016-00508 Page 77 intersections with a traffic signal or all way stop control. For intersections with cross street stop control, the delay and level of service for the worst individual movement (or movements sharing a single lane) are shown. ' TS = Traffic Signal ° Improvement consists of converting the rightmost northbound through lane to a shared through -right turn lane and signal timing adjustments. Mitigation Measure 2.1 — East Av. / Base Line Rd. (#11) — The following improvement is necessary to improve the intersection operations back to acceptable levels during the peak hours, thus reducing the cumulative impact to less than significant: • Project to contribute fair share towards improvements at East Avenue and Base Line Road as part of the 1-15 Freeway / Base Line Road Interchange Project. In sum, the proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. The project is in an area that is mostly developed with street improvements existing or included in project design. The project will not create a substantial increase in the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume, or congestion at intersections when existing conditions plus project impacts and mitigation measures, planned improvements and development impact fees and are factored. The project site will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per City roadway standards. In addition, the City has established a Transportation Development fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of building permits. Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation. With the above -identified mitigation measures and impact fees, the impacts are mitigated to less than significant levels. b) As shown in Table 1-1, 12 intersections were selected for the TIA prepared by Urban Crossroads based on the methodology defined in Appendix "C" of the County of San Bernardino Congestion Management Program (CMP) (1) that require analysis of intersection locations in which a proposed project is anticipated to contribute 50 or more peak -hour trips and in consultation with City of Rancho Cucamonga staff during the scoping process. Although each intersection may have unique operating characteristics, the "50 peak hour trip" criterion is a valid and proven way to establish a study area as it generally represents a threshold of trips at which an intersection would have the potential to be impacted. Freeway Mainline Segments The TIA also analyzed freeway segments, and merge and diverge ramp junction analysis for northbound and southbound directions of flow, as shown in Tables 1-2 and 1-3, respectively. TABLE 1-2: FREEWAY MAINLINE SEGMENT ANALYSIS LOCATIONS ID Freeway Mainline Segments 1 1-15 Freeway — Southbound, North of Base Line Road 2 1-15 Freeway — Southbound, South of Base Line Road Rev 3-1-16 P683 Less Than Significant Less and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation ThanIssues Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact intersections with a traffic signal or all way stop control. For intersections with cross street stop control, the delay and level of service for the worst individual movement (or movements sharing a single lane) are shown. ' TS = Traffic Signal ° Improvement consists of converting the rightmost northbound through lane to a shared through -right turn lane and signal timing adjustments. Mitigation Measure 2.1 — East Av. / Base Line Rd. (#11) — The following improvement is necessary to improve the intersection operations back to acceptable levels during the peak hours, thus reducing the cumulative impact to less than significant: • Project to contribute fair share towards improvements at East Avenue and Base Line Road as part of the 1-15 Freeway / Base Line Road Interchange Project. In sum, the proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. The project is in an area that is mostly developed with street improvements existing or included in project design. The project will not create a substantial increase in the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume, or congestion at intersections when existing conditions plus project impacts and mitigation measures, planned improvements and development impact fees and are factored. The project site will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per City roadway standards. In addition, the City has established a Transportation Development fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of building permits. Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation. With the above -identified mitigation measures and impact fees, the impacts are mitigated to less than significant levels. b) As shown in Table 1-1, 12 intersections were selected for the TIA prepared by Urban Crossroads based on the methodology defined in Appendix "C" of the County of San Bernardino Congestion Management Program (CMP) (1) that require analysis of intersection locations in which a proposed project is anticipated to contribute 50 or more peak -hour trips and in consultation with City of Rancho Cucamonga staff during the scoping process. Although each intersection may have unique operating characteristics, the "50 peak hour trip" criterion is a valid and proven way to establish a study area as it generally represents a threshold of trips at which an intersection would have the potential to be impacted. Freeway Mainline Segments The TIA also analyzed freeway segments, and merge and diverge ramp junction analysis for northbound and southbound directions of flow, as shown in Tables 1-2 and 1-3, respectively. TABLE 1-2: FREEWAY MAINLINE SEGMENT ANALYSIS LOCATIONS ID Freeway Mainline Segments 1 1-15 Freeway — Southbound, North of Base Line Road 2 1-15 Freeway — Southbound, South of Base Line Road Rev 3-1-16 P683 P684 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00451 AND DRC2016-00508 age 78 3 1-15 Freeway — Northbound, North of Base Line Road 4 1-15 Freeway — Northbound, South of Base Line Road TABLE 1-3: FREEWAY MERGE/DIVERGE RAMP JUNCTION ANALYSIS LOCATIONS ID Freeway Merge/Diverge Ramp Junction Analysis Locations Less Than 1-15 Freeway — Southbound, Off -Ramp at Base Line Road (Diverge) 2 1-15 Freeway — Southbound, On -Ramp at Base Line Road (Merge) 3 Significant Less 1-15 Freeway — Northbound, Off -Ramp at Base Line Road (Diverge) and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation ThanIssues Significant No AM Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 3 1-15 Freeway — Northbound, North of Base Line Road 4 1-15 Freeway — Northbound, South of Base Line Road TABLE 1-3: FREEWAY MERGE/DIVERGE RAMP JUNCTION ANALYSIS LOCATIONS ID Freeway Merge/Diverge Ramp Junction Analysis Locations 1 1-15 Freeway — Southbound, Off -Ramp at Base Line Road (Diverge) 2 1-15 Freeway — Southbound, On -Ramp at Base Line Road (Merge) 3 1-15 Freeway — Northbound, On -Ramp at Base Line Road (Merge) 4 1-15 Freeway — Northbound, Off -Ramp at Base Line Road (Diverge) TABLE 1-4: SUMMARY OF INTERSECTION LOS # Intersection Existing (2016) LOS E+P LOS 2020 NP LOS 2020 WP LOS 2040 NP LOS 2040 WP LOS Acceptable LOS AM PM AM PM AM PM AM PM AM PM AM PM I. Dwy.1 / Base Line Rd. -- -- B A A A B B A A B B D i Day Creek BI. / Victoria Park Ln. B B B B C B C B C B C B D 3 Day Creek BI. / Base Line Rd. D D D D D D D D D D D D D l Day Creek BI. / Dwy. 2 -- -- B B -- -- B B -- -- C C D i Day Creek Bl. / Dwy. 3/Madrigal Pl. A A A B A A A B A B A B D i Day Creek BI. / Church St. C C C C C D C D C D C D D 7 Day Creek BI. / E. Foothill Bl. C F C F E F E F F F F F D 3 Victoria Park Ln. / Base Line Rd. D C D C D C D C D D D D D Etiwanda Av. / Base Line Rd. D D D D E D E D E D E D E 0 1-15 SB Ramps / Base Line Rd.1 C C C C B B B B C B C B D 1 East Av. / Base Line Rd.1 E D E D D D D D D D D D D 2 1-15 NB Ramps/ Base Line Rd.1 C C I C C C C C C C C C C D LOS = Level of Service, E+P = Existing Plus Project; NP = No Project (or Without Project); WP = With Project Rev 3-1-16 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00451 AND DRC2016-00508 age 79 1-15 Freeway/Base Line Road interchange improvements are assumed to be in place. The interchange project is currently under construction and is anticipated to be completed by the end of 2016. As indicated in Table 1-4, the intersection at Day Creek and Foothill operates at a LOS F during the PM hour. This intersection is anticipated to continue to operate at unacceptable levels during one or more of the peak hours with the addition of project traffic. As such, the impact is cumulatively considerable; however, with the improvements constructed under Mitigation Measure 1.1, the intersection will operate to better than pre - project levels during the peak hours, thus reducing the cumulative impact to less than significant. Opening Year Cumulative 2020 Freeway Off -Ramp Queuing, Freeway Segment and Freeway Merge/Diverge Analyses Off -Ramp Queuing Analysis: A queuing analysis was performed for the off -ramps at the I- 15 Freeway Base Line Road interchanges to assess vehicle queues for the off ramps that may potentially result in deficient peak hour operations at the ramp -to -arterial intersections and may potentially "spill back" onto the 1-15 Freeway mainline. There are no movements that are currently experiencing queuing issues during the weekday AM or weekday PM peak 951h percentile traffic flows. Freeway Segment Analysis: There are no additional freeway mainline segments that are anticipated to operate at unacceptable LOS, in addition to those previously identified under Existing (2016) or E+P traffic conditions for Opening Year Cumulative (2020) Without Project traffic conditions. Freeway Merge/Diverge Analysis: Ramp merge and diverge operations have been evaluated for Opening Year Cumulative (2020) Without and With Project traffic conditions at the 1-15 Freeway and Base Line Road interchange. Consistent with the basic freeway segment analysis, the ramp junction analysis has also been performed assuming the proposed interchange configuration at the 1-15 Freeway and Base Line Road. It is anticipated that all the ramp junctions along the 1-15 Freeway at Base Line Road are projected to operate at unacceptable LOS for Opening Year Cumulative Without Project traffic conditions. The addition of Project traffic is not anticipated to result in any additional LOS deficiencies for the freeway ramp junctions. Recommended improvements to address deficiencies on freeway facilities: At this time, Caltrans has no fee programs or other improvement programs in place to address the deficiencies caused by development projects in the City of Rancho Cucamonga (or other neighboring jurisdictions) on SHS roadway segments. As such, no improvements have been recommended to address the Opening Year Cumulative deficiencies on the SHS, because there is no feasible mitigation available. Opening Year Cumulative 2040 Freeway Off -Ramp Queuing, Freeway Segment and Freeway Merge/Diverge Analyses Off -Ramp Queuing Analysis: A queuing analysis was performed for the off -ramps at the I- 15 Freeway Base Line Road interchanges to assess vehicle queues for the off ramps that Rev 3-1-16 P685 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 1-15 Freeway/Base Line Road interchange improvements are assumed to be in place. The interchange project is currently under construction and is anticipated to be completed by the end of 2016. As indicated in Table 1-4, the intersection at Day Creek and Foothill operates at a LOS F during the PM hour. This intersection is anticipated to continue to operate at unacceptable levels during one or more of the peak hours with the addition of project traffic. As such, the impact is cumulatively considerable; however, with the improvements constructed under Mitigation Measure 1.1, the intersection will operate to better than pre - project levels during the peak hours, thus reducing the cumulative impact to less than significant. Opening Year Cumulative 2020 Freeway Off -Ramp Queuing, Freeway Segment and Freeway Merge/Diverge Analyses Off -Ramp Queuing Analysis: A queuing analysis was performed for the off -ramps at the I- 15 Freeway Base Line Road interchanges to assess vehicle queues for the off ramps that may potentially result in deficient peak hour operations at the ramp -to -arterial intersections and may potentially "spill back" onto the 1-15 Freeway mainline. There are no movements that are currently experiencing queuing issues during the weekday AM or weekday PM peak 951h percentile traffic flows. Freeway Segment Analysis: There are no additional freeway mainline segments that are anticipated to operate at unacceptable LOS, in addition to those previously identified under Existing (2016) or E+P traffic conditions for Opening Year Cumulative (2020) Without Project traffic conditions. Freeway Merge/Diverge Analysis: Ramp merge and diverge operations have been evaluated for Opening Year Cumulative (2020) Without and With Project traffic conditions at the 1-15 Freeway and Base Line Road interchange. Consistent with the basic freeway segment analysis, the ramp junction analysis has also been performed assuming the proposed interchange configuration at the 1-15 Freeway and Base Line Road. It is anticipated that all the ramp junctions along the 1-15 Freeway at Base Line Road are projected to operate at unacceptable LOS for Opening Year Cumulative Without Project traffic conditions. The addition of Project traffic is not anticipated to result in any additional LOS deficiencies for the freeway ramp junctions. Recommended improvements to address deficiencies on freeway facilities: At this time, Caltrans has no fee programs or other improvement programs in place to address the deficiencies caused by development projects in the City of Rancho Cucamonga (or other neighboring jurisdictions) on SHS roadway segments. As such, no improvements have been recommended to address the Opening Year Cumulative deficiencies on the SHS, because there is no feasible mitigation available. Opening Year Cumulative 2040 Freeway Off -Ramp Queuing, Freeway Segment and Freeway Merge/Diverge Analyses Off -Ramp Queuing Analysis: A queuing analysis was performed for the off -ramps at the I- 15 Freeway Base Line Road interchanges to assess vehicle queues for the off ramps that Rev 3-1-16 P685 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00451 AND DRC2016-00508 Page 80 may potentially result in deficient peak hour operations at the ramp -to -arterial intersections and may potentially "spill back" onto the 1-15 Freeway mainline. There are no movements that are currently experiencing queuing issues during the weekday AM or weekday PM peak 95th percentile traffic flows. Freeway Segment Analysis: All of the study area freeway mainline segments are anticipated to operate at an unacceptable LOS (i.e., LOS E or worse) for Horizon Year Without Project conditions during one or more peak hours. The addition of Project traffic is not anticipated to result in any additional LOS deficiencies for the freeway segments. Freeway Merge/Diverge Analysis: Ramp merge and diverge operations have been evaluated for Horizon Year (2040) Without and With Project traffic conditions at the 1-15 Freeway and Base Line Road interchange. It is anticipated that all the ramp junctions along the 1-15 Freeway at Base Line Road are projected to operate at unacceptable LOS for Horizon Year Without Project traffic conditions during one or more peak hours. The addition of Project traffic is not anticipated to result in any additional LOS deficiencies for the freeway ramp junctions. Recommended improvements to address deficiencies on freeway facilities: The 1-15 Corridor Improvement Project, includes two alternatives being studied by SANBAG. The first alternative includes no construction of additional travel lanes or ramp improvements. The second alternative includes the addition of two 33 -mile Express Lanes in each direction between the SR -60 Freeway and the US -395. Single -occupant motorists may choose to pay a toll to travel faster in the Express Lanes; high -occupancy vehicles (HOV) would utilize the Express Lanes at no cost. Based on information provided on the website, these improvements are longer range with anticipated opening of Phase 1 in 2024. All of the freeway mainline segments are anticipated to operate at an acceptable LOS with the construction of two Express Lanes in both directions of travel (i.e., LOS D or better), with the exception of the following freeway segments: • 1-15 Freeway Southbound, South of Base Line Rd. (#2) — LOS E AM peak hour only • 1-15 Freeway Northbound, South of Base Line Rd. (#4) — LOS E PM peak hour only The 1-15 Freeway ramp junctions are anticipated to operate at an acceptable LOS with the improvements discussed above (i.e., LOS D or better), with the exception of the following freeway ramp junction: 1-15 Freeway Northbound, Off -Ramp at Base Line Rd. (#3) — LOS E PM peak hour only At this time, Caltrans has no fee programs or other improvement programs in place to address the deficiencies caused by development projects in the City of Rancho Cucamonga (or other neighboring jurisdictions) on SHS roadway segments. In November 2004, San Bernardino County voters passed the Measure I extension (30 years) which requires local jurisdictions to impose appropriate fees on development for their fair share toward regional transportation improvement projects. On May 18, 2005, the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted a Comprehensive Transportation Fee Schedule updating Rev 3-1-16 P686 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: pp g Potentially Significant with Mitigation Than Than No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact may potentially result in deficient peak hour operations at the ramp -to -arterial intersections and may potentially "spill back" onto the 1-15 Freeway mainline. There are no movements that are currently experiencing queuing issues during the weekday AM or weekday PM peak 95th percentile traffic flows. Freeway Segment Analysis: All of the study area freeway mainline segments are anticipated to operate at an unacceptable LOS (i.e., LOS E or worse) for Horizon Year Without Project conditions during one or more peak hours. The addition of Project traffic is not anticipated to result in any additional LOS deficiencies for the freeway segments. Freeway Merge/Diverge Analysis: Ramp merge and diverge operations have been evaluated for Horizon Year (2040) Without and With Project traffic conditions at the 1-15 Freeway and Base Line Road interchange. It is anticipated that all the ramp junctions along the 1-15 Freeway at Base Line Road are projected to operate at unacceptable LOS for Horizon Year Without Project traffic conditions during one or more peak hours. The addition of Project traffic is not anticipated to result in any additional LOS deficiencies for the freeway ramp junctions. Recommended improvements to address deficiencies on freeway facilities: The 1-15 Corridor Improvement Project, includes two alternatives being studied by SANBAG. The first alternative includes no construction of additional travel lanes or ramp improvements. The second alternative includes the addition of two 33 -mile Express Lanes in each direction between the SR -60 Freeway and the US -395. Single -occupant motorists may choose to pay a toll to travel faster in the Express Lanes; high -occupancy vehicles (HOV) would utilize the Express Lanes at no cost. Based on information provided on the website, these improvements are longer range with anticipated opening of Phase 1 in 2024. All of the freeway mainline segments are anticipated to operate at an acceptable LOS with the construction of two Express Lanes in both directions of travel (i.e., LOS D or better), with the exception of the following freeway segments: • 1-15 Freeway Southbound, South of Base Line Rd. (#2) — LOS E AM peak hour only • 1-15 Freeway Northbound, South of Base Line Rd. (#4) — LOS E PM peak hour only The 1-15 Freeway ramp junctions are anticipated to operate at an acceptable LOS with the improvements discussed above (i.e., LOS D or better), with the exception of the following freeway ramp junction: 1-15 Freeway Northbound, Off -Ramp at Base Line Rd. (#3) — LOS E PM peak hour only At this time, Caltrans has no fee programs or other improvement programs in place to address the deficiencies caused by development projects in the City of Rancho Cucamonga (or other neighboring jurisdictions) on SHS roadway segments. In November 2004, San Bernardino County voters passed the Measure I extension (30 years) which requires local jurisdictions to impose appropriate fees on development for their fair share toward regional transportation improvement projects. On May 18, 2005, the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted a Comprehensive Transportation Fee Schedule updating Rev 3-1-16 P686 P687 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00451 AND DRC2016-00508 Page 81 these development impact fees. As a result, the San Bernardino County Congestion Management Agency waived the Congestion Management Plan (CMP) Traffic Impact Analysis reporting requirement. This project will be required, as a condition of approval, to pay the adopted transportation development fee prior to issuance of building permit. The project is in an area that is mostly developed with all travel lanes along Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road existing. The project will be required to provide missing street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. See also discussion and analysis under b) above. With payment of the Transportation Impact fees and the implementation of the mitigation measures under b), the impacts will be less than significant. C) The site is not located within an airport land use plan according to the General Plan Figure PS -7, General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.8-1 and the Ontario Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport. The project site is located approximately 4.5 northeasterly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. No impact is anticipated. d) The project is in an area that is mostly developed. The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. The project design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming uses. The project will, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards because of a design feature. No impacts are anticipated. e) The project will be designed to provide access for all emergency vehicles during construction and upon completion of the project and will therefore not create an inadequate emergency access. The project will have one access point off Base Line Road and two access points off Day Creek Boulevard. In addition to the three access points, the project will have one Emergency Vehicle Access (EVA), for exclusive use by emergency vehicles, off Day Creek Boulevard. No impacts are anticipated. f) The design of the project includes, or the project will be conditioned to provide, features supporting transportation and vehicle trip reduction (e.g., bus bays, bicycle racks, carpool parking, etc.). There is an existing east -west Omnitrans bus (Route 67) that operates along the project's frontage along Base Line, and the project is within walking distance (% mile) to Route 82 along Church Street, which connects to Milliken Avenue. No impacts are anticipated. 17. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project.- roject.Cause Less Than Causea substantial adverse change in the significance of a Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PP g Potentiallyignifa Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural Impact Incorporated Impact Impact these development impact fees. As a result, the San Bernardino County Congestion Management Agency waived the Congestion Management Plan (CMP) Traffic Impact Analysis reporting requirement. This project will be required, as a condition of approval, to pay the adopted transportation development fee prior to issuance of building permit. The project is in an area that is mostly developed with all travel lanes along Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road existing. The project will be required to provide missing street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. See also discussion and analysis under b) above. With payment of the Transportation Impact fees and the implementation of the mitigation measures under b), the impacts will be less than significant. C) The site is not located within an airport land use plan according to the General Plan Figure PS -7, General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.8-1 and the Ontario Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport. The project site is located approximately 4.5 northeasterly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. No impact is anticipated. d) The project is in an area that is mostly developed. The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. The project design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming uses. The project will, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards because of a design feature. No impacts are anticipated. e) The project will be designed to provide access for all emergency vehicles during construction and upon completion of the project and will therefore not create an inadequate emergency access. The project will have one access point off Base Line Road and two access points off Day Creek Boulevard. In addition to the three access points, the project will have one Emergency Vehicle Access (EVA), for exclusive use by emergency vehicles, off Day Creek Boulevard. No impacts are anticipated. f) The design of the project includes, or the project will be conditioned to provide, features supporting transportation and vehicle trip reduction (e.g., bus bays, bicycle racks, carpool parking, etc.). There is an existing east -west Omnitrans bus (Route 67) that operates along the project's frontage along Base Line, and the project is within walking distance (% mile) to Route 82 along Church Street, which connects to Milliken Avenue. No impacts are anticipated. 17. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project.- roject.Cause Causea substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code Section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with the cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is: a) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of () () () (✓) Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code Section 5020.1 (K)? Rev 3-1-16 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00451 AND DRC2016-00508 age 82 b) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion Less Than and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant Significant Less and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation ThanIssues Significant No Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria Impact Incorporated Impact Impact b) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe. Comments: a) As defined in Public Resources Code 21074 and applying the criteria located in Public Resources Code Section 5024.1 (subdivision c), the project site has not been identified as a "Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2.24 (Historic Preservation. Additionally, A Cultural Resources Assessment was performed on the project site by LSA Associates (May 2, 2016). In conjunction with the South Central Coastal Information Center at California State University, Fullerton, the California Historical Resources Information was also consulted. A total of 24 resources were identified within a 1 mile search of the project site. Literature and aerial photographs were also reviewed. The study also included an intensive field survey of the project site. Parallel, linear transects separated by approximately 20-30 feet were conducted over the project site. Aerial photographs suggest project was once covered in vineyards. No historic aerial photographs or maps depict any buildings or structures in the project area at any time. No cultural resource sites were observed in the project area during the pedestrian survey. The project site is somewhat disturbed by prior bulldozing and dumping of construction material. The study concludes with the absence of cultural resources in the current project area and surrounding vicinity, no additional cultural work is recommended. No adverse impacts are anticipated. b) In conformance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5, A Cultural Resources Assessment was performed on the project site by LSA Associates (May 2, 2016). In conjunction with the South Central Coastal Information Center at California State University, Fullerton, the California Historical Resources Information was also consulted. A total of 24 resources were identified within a 1 mile search of the project site. Literature and aerial photographs were also reviewed. The study also included an intensive field survey of the project site. Parallel, linear transects separated by approximately 20-30 feet were conducted over the project site. Aerial photographs suggest project was once covered in vineyards. No historic aerial photographs or maps depict any buildings or structures in the project area at any time. No cultural resource sites were observed in the project area during the pedestrian survey. The project site is somewhat disturbed by prior bulldozing and dumping of construction material. The study concludes with the absence of cultural resources in the current project area and surrounding vicinity, no additional cultural work is recommended. The study does recommend that in the event that previously undocumented archaeological resources are identified during earthmoving activities, further work in the area should be Rev 3-1-16 P688 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00451 AND DRC2016-00508 Page 83 halted until a professional archaeologist can assess the nature and significance of the finding can be determined. In conformance with California State Bill 18, staff contacted the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) for a list of Tribal Communities to provide notice to regarding the opportunity to consult since the project has an associated Community Plan Amendment. The NAHC responded with a list of 12 Tribes. Along with a CHRIS Report, staff sent a Tribal Consultation Request on July 13, 2016, for the proposed Community Plan Amendment to the following Tribal Communities: Gabrieleno/ Tongva Nation, Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians, Serrano Nation of Mission Indians, Moronga Band of Mission Indians, San Manuel Band of Mission Indians, Morongo Band of Mission Indians, Gabrieleno/Tongva Nation, Gabrieleno/ Tonga San Gabriel Band of Mission Indians, San Fernando Band of Mission Indians, Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians, San Manuel Band of Mission Indians and Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation,. Of the 12 Tribes who were notified, none requested that consultation commence. In conformance with Assembly Bill 52 (AB52), staff sent a Tribal Consultation Request on October 4, 2016, of the proposed project to the following Tribal Communities who had requested to be notified: San Manuel Band of Mission Indians, Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians and the Torres Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians. Following the prescribed timelines for AB52, staff did not receive any requests for consultation. Should any undocumented archaeological or cultural resources be discovered during grading activities, adherence to the mitigation measures listed below will ensure that all impacts will be less than significant. 1) In the event that human remains or funerary objects are encountered during any activities associated with the project, work in the immediate vicinity (within a 100 -foot buffer of the find) shall cease and the County Coroner shall be contacted pursuant to State Health and Safety Code §7050.5 and that code enforced for the duration of the project. 2) In the event that Native American cultural resources are discovered during project activities, all work in the immediate vicinity of the find (within a 60 - foot buffer) shall cease and a qualified archaeologist meeting Secretary of Interior standards shall be hired to assess the find. Work on the other portions of the project outside of the buffered area may continue during this assessment period. The archaeologist shall contact Tribal communities for input regarding the preservation, retention and final disposition of any discovered cultural resources. The archaeologist shall prepare a mitigation plan and technical resources management report, which shall document the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. 3) In the event that significant Native American historical resources, as defined by CEQA (as amended, 2015), are discovered and avoidance cannot be ensured, an SOI -qualified archaeologist shall be retained to develop a cultural resources Treatment Plan, as well as a Discovery and Monitoring Plan. Rev 3-1-16 P689 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact halted until a professional archaeologist can assess the nature and significance of the finding can be determined. In conformance with California State Bill 18, staff contacted the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) for a list of Tribal Communities to provide notice to regarding the opportunity to consult since the project has an associated Community Plan Amendment. The NAHC responded with a list of 12 Tribes. Along with a CHRIS Report, staff sent a Tribal Consultation Request on July 13, 2016, for the proposed Community Plan Amendment to the following Tribal Communities: Gabrieleno/ Tongva Nation, Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians, Serrano Nation of Mission Indians, Moronga Band of Mission Indians, San Manuel Band of Mission Indians, Morongo Band of Mission Indians, Gabrieleno/Tongva Nation, Gabrieleno/ Tonga San Gabriel Band of Mission Indians, San Fernando Band of Mission Indians, Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians, San Manuel Band of Mission Indians and Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation,. Of the 12 Tribes who were notified, none requested that consultation commence. In conformance with Assembly Bill 52 (AB52), staff sent a Tribal Consultation Request on October 4, 2016, of the proposed project to the following Tribal Communities who had requested to be notified: San Manuel Band of Mission Indians, Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians and the Torres Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians. Following the prescribed timelines for AB52, staff did not receive any requests for consultation. Should any undocumented archaeological or cultural resources be discovered during grading activities, adherence to the mitigation measures listed below will ensure that all impacts will be less than significant. 1) In the event that human remains or funerary objects are encountered during any activities associated with the project, work in the immediate vicinity (within a 100 -foot buffer of the find) shall cease and the County Coroner shall be contacted pursuant to State Health and Safety Code §7050.5 and that code enforced for the duration of the project. 2) In the event that Native American cultural resources are discovered during project activities, all work in the immediate vicinity of the find (within a 60 - foot buffer) shall cease and a qualified archaeologist meeting Secretary of Interior standards shall be hired to assess the find. Work on the other portions of the project outside of the buffered area may continue during this assessment period. The archaeologist shall contact Tribal communities for input regarding the preservation, retention and final disposition of any discovered cultural resources. The archaeologist shall prepare a mitigation plan and technical resources management report, which shall document the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. 3) In the event that significant Native American historical resources, as defined by CEQA (as amended, 2015), are discovered and avoidance cannot be ensured, an SOI -qualified archaeologist shall be retained to develop a cultural resources Treatment Plan, as well as a Discovery and Monitoring Plan. Rev 3-1-16 P689 P690 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00451 AND DRC2016-00508 Page 84 18. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project.- roject.a) Less Than a)Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the () Significant Less (✓) Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No b) Require or result in the construction of new water or Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 18. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project.- roject.a) a)Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the () () () (✓) applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or () () () (✓) wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? C) Require or result in the construction of new storm () () () (✓) water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the () () () (✓) project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment () () () (✓) provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted () () () (✓) capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and () () () (✓) regulations related to solid waste? Comments: a) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP -1 and RP -4 treatment plants. The RP -1 capacity is sufficient to exceed the additional development within the western and southern areas of the City. The RP -4 treatment plant has a potential ultimate capacity of 28 mgd which is considered more than adequate to capacity to treat all increases in wastewater generation for buildout of the General Plan. The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated. b) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP -4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP -1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which is at capacity. The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated. C) All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. The impact is not considered significant. Rev 3-1-16 P691 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00451 AND DRC2016-00508 Page 85 d) The CVWD provides water treatment, storage and distribution of domestic water to Rancho Cucamonga and portions of the cities of Ontario and Fontana, and a tract in Upland. The current daily water usage in the CVWD service area is approximately 41.7 million gallons per day (mgd). Residential water use amounts to about 60 percent of the total water consumed. Landscaping (public and private) is the next largest consumer of water at 20 percent. Under Senate Bill 610 (SB 610), Water Supply Assessments are required for projects that exceed the following sizes: 1) residential development of more than 500 dwelling units; 2) shipping center or business establishment employing more than 1,000 persons or having more than 500,000 square feet; 3) commercial office buildings employing more than 1,000 persons or having more than 250,000 square feet; 4) hotel or motel having more than 500 rooms; 5) industrial, manufacturing, processing plant, or industrial park housing more than 1,000 persons, occupying more than 40 acres of land, or having more than 650,000 square feet; 6) mixed use project including one or more of the projects specified above; 7) any other project that would demand an amount of water equivalent to or greater than the amount of water required by a 500 -dwelling unit project; and 8) any project that accounts for an increase of 10 percent or more in the number of existing service connections for a public water system. Under SB 221, a Water Supply Assessment is required when: 1) A project that is a residential development of more than 500 dwelling units; 2) a project that accounts for an increase of 10 percent or more in the number of existing service connections for a public water system; and 3) applies to development agreements that Include such subdivision. The City has determined that the proposed mixed use project (380 residential units, 12,000 square feet of restaurant use and a 71 room hotel) does not meet one of the requirements; therefore, a Water Supply Assessment is not required. The project is served by the CVWD water system. There is currently a sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this project. No impacts are anticipated. e) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP -4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP -1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which is at capacity. No impacts are anticipated. f) Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs. No impacts are anticipated. g) This project complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste. The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated. Rev 3-1-16 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sour: PP g Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact d) The CVWD provides water treatment, storage and distribution of domestic water to Rancho Cucamonga and portions of the cities of Ontario and Fontana, and a tract in Upland. The current daily water usage in the CVWD service area is approximately 41.7 million gallons per day (mgd). Residential water use amounts to about 60 percent of the total water consumed. Landscaping (public and private) is the next largest consumer of water at 20 percent. Under Senate Bill 610 (SB 610), Water Supply Assessments are required for projects that exceed the following sizes: 1) residential development of more than 500 dwelling units; 2) shipping center or business establishment employing more than 1,000 persons or having more than 500,000 square feet; 3) commercial office buildings employing more than 1,000 persons or having more than 250,000 square feet; 4) hotel or motel having more than 500 rooms; 5) industrial, manufacturing, processing plant, or industrial park housing more than 1,000 persons, occupying more than 40 acres of land, or having more than 650,000 square feet; 6) mixed use project including one or more of the projects specified above; 7) any other project that would demand an amount of water equivalent to or greater than the amount of water required by a 500 -dwelling unit project; and 8) any project that accounts for an increase of 10 percent or more in the number of existing service connections for a public water system. Under SB 221, a Water Supply Assessment is required when: 1) A project that is a residential development of more than 500 dwelling units; 2) a project that accounts for an increase of 10 percent or more in the number of existing service connections for a public water system; and 3) applies to development agreements that Include such subdivision. The City has determined that the proposed mixed use project (380 residential units, 12,000 square feet of restaurant use and a 71 room hotel) does not meet one of the requirements; therefore, a Water Supply Assessment is not required. The project is served by the CVWD water system. There is currently a sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this project. No impacts are anticipated. e) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP -4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP -1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which is at capacity. No impacts are anticipated. f) Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs. No impacts are anticipated. g) This project complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste. The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated. Rev 3-1-16 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00451 AND DRC2016-00508 Page 86 19. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE Less Than a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the () Significant Less ( ) Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PP g Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or Impact Incor orated Im act Im act 19. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the () (✓) () ( ) quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually () (✓) () ( ) limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? C) Does the project have environmental effects that will () (✓) () ( ) cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Comments: a) The site is not located in an area of sensitive biological resources as identified on the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Figure RC -4. Additionally, the area surrounding the site is either developed or is approved for development. In order to ensure that all potential impacts to biological resources were evaluated, a Biological Technical Report, a Delhi Sands Flower Loving Fly Habitat Suitability Evaluation, a California Gnatcatcher Survey and a trapping survey for the San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat was performed. Also, according to the General Plan FPEIR, the site may contain mixed sage scrub (Riversidean Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub (RAFSS). A Biological Technical Report was completed for the project site by Glenn Lukos Associates (GLA; April 21, 2017). The report includes a field study that study focused on a number of primary objectives that would comply with CEQA requirements, including (1) general biological surveys and vegetation mapping; (2) habitat assessments for special - status plant and wildlife species; (3) focused plant surveys; and (4) focused wildlife surveys. Special Status Plants: According to the Biological Technical Report, no special -status plants were detected at the Project site during focused surveys, and the project will not impact any special status plants (Glenn Lukos Associates; April 21, 2017, page 19). As such, there will be no adverse cumulative impact to special status plants. Special Status Animals: Two special -status small mammals (northwestern San Diego pocket mouse and desert woodrat) were detected at the project site during the trapping study. Both species were trapped in very low densities. The coastal California gnatcatcher and Burrowing Owl were both confirmed absent through focused surveys. No other special -status animals were detected at the project site, although the site has the Rev 3-1-16 P692 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00451 AND DRC2016-00508 Page 87 potential to support several non -listed, special -status reptile species that were not observed during at the site during the various surveys, but whose absence could not be ruled out. The potential for these species is relatively low based on the past disturbance of the site, and general isolation of the site. If present, the reptile species are likely to occur in low densities. Based on the results of the focused biological surveys, the project will not impact any federally or state -listed animal species, including the coastal California gnatcatcher (CAGN) and the San Bernardino kangaroo rat (SBKR), and therefore "take" authorization would not be required for the Project. Based on the results of the trapping study, the project will remove habitat supporting two non -listed, special -status small mammals, including the desert woodrat and northwestern San Diego pocket mouse. In addition, the Project will remove habitat with the potential to support several non -listed, special -status reptiles, including the coast horned lizard, orangethroat whiptail, rosy boa, red diamond rattlesnake, and silvery legless lizard. However, due to relatively small size and the general isolation of the site, and the relatively low sensitivity of these species, the loss of habitat at the property would not have a substantial, adverse effect on these species. Therefore, cumulative biological impacts would be less than significant and would not require mitigation. Burrowing Owls A burrowing owl survey is required prior to ground clearing activities to assure that burrowing owls have not occupied the project site during the intervening time between the submitted study and ground clearing activities. With the mitigation measures included under Section 4 (Biological Resources), any cumulative impacts to Burrowing Owls sensitive species will be less than significant. Riversidean Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub (RAFSS) Plant Community Impacts Any CEQA project that involves the removal of habitat must consider if any special status species (e.g., Threatened or Endangered species, CNPS List 1B and 2 plants, or species protected under Section 15380 of CEQA) are potentially present on the project site and if the project impacts could be considered significant by the City. If potential habitat is present in an area, focused surveys shall be conducted prior to construction activities in order to document the presence or absence of a species on the project site. Botanical surveys shall be conducted during the appropriate blooming period for a species. If no special status species are found on the project site, no additional action is warranted. If special status species are found, appropriate mitigation would be required in coordination with the City as described in Section 4 (Biological Resources) above. The project will result in the loss of approximately 25.48 acres of scrub vegetation that is a functionally isolated remnant of a historically broader extent of alluvial scrub vegetation, namely RAFSS, associated with the Etiwanda Fan and the Day Creek wash. However, residential/commercial development and flood control improvements over time have eliminated the majority of the alluvial scrub vegetation south of the 210 Freeway (as well as north of the Freeway), leaving only scattered remnant patches along the Day Creek Channel and in a few other locations. These patches of scrub vegetation are detached from the remaining Etiwanda Fan located north of the 210 Freeway, and are no longer Rev 3-1-16 P693 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g Potentially Significant Wth Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact potential to support several non -listed, special -status reptile species that were not observed during at the site during the various surveys, but whose absence could not be ruled out. The potential for these species is relatively low based on the past disturbance of the site, and general isolation of the site. If present, the reptile species are likely to occur in low densities. Based on the results of the focused biological surveys, the project will not impact any federally or state -listed animal species, including the coastal California gnatcatcher (CAGN) and the San Bernardino kangaroo rat (SBKR), and therefore "take" authorization would not be required for the Project. Based on the results of the trapping study, the project will remove habitat supporting two non -listed, special -status small mammals, including the desert woodrat and northwestern San Diego pocket mouse. In addition, the Project will remove habitat with the potential to support several non -listed, special -status reptiles, including the coast horned lizard, orangethroat whiptail, rosy boa, red diamond rattlesnake, and silvery legless lizard. However, due to relatively small size and the general isolation of the site, and the relatively low sensitivity of these species, the loss of habitat at the property would not have a substantial, adverse effect on these species. Therefore, cumulative biological impacts would be less than significant and would not require mitigation. Burrowing Owls A burrowing owl survey is required prior to ground clearing activities to assure that burrowing owls have not occupied the project site during the intervening time between the submitted study and ground clearing activities. With the mitigation measures included under Section 4 (Biological Resources), any cumulative impacts to Burrowing Owls sensitive species will be less than significant. Riversidean Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub (RAFSS) Plant Community Impacts Any CEQA project that involves the removal of habitat must consider if any special status species (e.g., Threatened or Endangered species, CNPS List 1B and 2 plants, or species protected under Section 15380 of CEQA) are potentially present on the project site and if the project impacts could be considered significant by the City. If potential habitat is present in an area, focused surveys shall be conducted prior to construction activities in order to document the presence or absence of a species on the project site. Botanical surveys shall be conducted during the appropriate blooming period for a species. If no special status species are found on the project site, no additional action is warranted. If special status species are found, appropriate mitigation would be required in coordination with the City as described in Section 4 (Biological Resources) above. The project will result in the loss of approximately 25.48 acres of scrub vegetation that is a functionally isolated remnant of a historically broader extent of alluvial scrub vegetation, namely RAFSS, associated with the Etiwanda Fan and the Day Creek wash. However, residential/commercial development and flood control improvements over time have eliminated the majority of the alluvial scrub vegetation south of the 210 Freeway (as well as north of the Freeway), leaving only scattered remnant patches along the Day Creek Channel and in a few other locations. These patches of scrub vegetation are detached from the remaining Etiwanda Fan located north of the 210 Freeway, and are no longer Rev 3-1-16 P693 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00451 AND DRC2016-00508 Page 88 subject to the alluvial processes that both created the habitat, and that are necessary to sustain the habitat in the future. The habitat at the Project site has been disturbed over the years, such that the site is dominated by California buckwheat, giving the site the appearance of alluvial scrub vegetation in an earlier stage of ecological succession. However, due to the extent of development and flood control improvements, the project site is functionally isolated from the degree of flood scour that would be necessary to naturally sustain characteristic RAFSS habitat in the future. Furthermore, the site is not occupied by any listed species known in association with alluvial scrub habitats, including the coastal California gnatcatcher and the San Bernardino kangaroo rat, and listed plants such as the Santa Ana River woolly star and the slender horned spineflower. Although the site has some potential for future use by the gnatcatcher, the isolation of the site eliminates the possibility for the future occupation by SBKR, and the establishment of rare plants that are currently absent from the site, and in the case of the woolly star and spineflower, rely on periodic flooding to maintain suitable habitat conditions for these species. As a result, the scrub vegetation at the site does not have long-term conservation value as RAFSS, and the loss of vegetation at the site would not have a substantial adverse effect on remaining functional RAFSS associated with the Etiwanda Fan, Lytle Creek, Santa Ana River floodplain and elsewhere in the region. Therefore, cumulative the impacts would be less than significant and would not require mitigation. Cultural Resources No cultural resources are known to exist on the site; however, in the unlikely event that archaeological and paleontological resources are discovered during construction, mitigation measures are included to ensure proper handling and protection. Therefore, there are no cumulative impacts to cultural resources. b) If the proposed project were approved, the applicant would be required to develop the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. The 2010 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of build -out in the City and Sphere -of -Influence. The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to Aesthetics, Agriculture and Forest Resources, Air Quality, Climate Change and Mineral Resources. Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources; however, they would not reduce impacts to less -than -significant levels. As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)). These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use projects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space. With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is required. It should also be noted that significant conservation efforts have taken place within the geographic area of the Etiwanda Fan from Deer Creek to San Sevaine Creek and include the following conservation areas: Rev 3-1-16 P694 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: pp g Potentiallyignif Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact subject to the alluvial processes that both created the habitat, and that are necessary to sustain the habitat in the future. The habitat at the Project site has been disturbed over the years, such that the site is dominated by California buckwheat, giving the site the appearance of alluvial scrub vegetation in an earlier stage of ecological succession. However, due to the extent of development and flood control improvements, the project site is functionally isolated from the degree of flood scour that would be necessary to naturally sustain characteristic RAFSS habitat in the future. Furthermore, the site is not occupied by any listed species known in association with alluvial scrub habitats, including the coastal California gnatcatcher and the San Bernardino kangaroo rat, and listed plants such as the Santa Ana River woolly star and the slender horned spineflower. Although the site has some potential for future use by the gnatcatcher, the isolation of the site eliminates the possibility for the future occupation by SBKR, and the establishment of rare plants that are currently absent from the site, and in the case of the woolly star and spineflower, rely on periodic flooding to maintain suitable habitat conditions for these species. As a result, the scrub vegetation at the site does not have long-term conservation value as RAFSS, and the loss of vegetation at the site would not have a substantial adverse effect on remaining functional RAFSS associated with the Etiwanda Fan, Lytle Creek, Santa Ana River floodplain and elsewhere in the region. Therefore, cumulative the impacts would be less than significant and would not require mitigation. Cultural Resources No cultural resources are known to exist on the site; however, in the unlikely event that archaeological and paleontological resources are discovered during construction, mitigation measures are included to ensure proper handling and protection. Therefore, there are no cumulative impacts to cultural resources. b) If the proposed project were approved, the applicant would be required to develop the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. The 2010 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of build -out in the City and Sphere -of -Influence. The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to Aesthetics, Agriculture and Forest Resources, Air Quality, Climate Change and Mineral Resources. Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources; however, they would not reduce impacts to less -than -significant levels. As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)). These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use projects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space. With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is required. It should also be noted that significant conservation efforts have taken place within the geographic area of the Etiwanda Fan from Deer Creek to San Sevaine Creek and include the following conservation areas: Rev 3-1-16 P694 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00451 AND DRC2016-00508 Page 89 North Etiwanda Preserve. In 1998, the County of San Bernardino created a 763 -acre conservation area in response to impacts to AFSS from the Foothill Freeway (SR -210) project. The Preserve and surrounding lands also contain significant amounts of other rare and threatened habitats that include Sycamore Alluvial Woodland, California Walnut Woodland, and Fresh Water Marsh. North Etiwanda Preserve Expansion Area. In 2009 an additional 440 acres of land was set aside for conservation purposes adjacent to the North Etiwanda Preserve and within the San Sevaine Creek area. Along with the original 763 acre preserve, these lands are managed with the intent of permanently protecting the alluvial scrub and other native communities and species that occupy the North Etiwanda Preserve. U.S. Forest Service Conservation Area. This 880 -acre conservation area is located adjacent to the western edge of the North Etiwanda Preserve and includes land purchased by the Metropolitan Water District along Day Canyon and Day Creek as mitigation for the MWD's Inland Feeder Project. The land has been transferred to the U.S. Forest Service and is a part of the San Bernardino National Forest. The majority of this conservation area extends beyond the City's Sphere of Influence, into unincorporated territory. San Sevaine Preserve. This 137 -acre conservation area was established by San Bernardino County as mitigation for floodwater diversion structures and debris basins. Day Creek Preserve. A 200 -acre conservation area was set aside through a conservation easement to the San Bernardino County Flood Control District as mitigation for impacts from sand and gravel operations. Tract 16072 Mitigation Area. This mitigation area consists of 335 acres that will be conserved as habitat mitigation for Tentative Tract 16072. This area is within the Day Creek watershed and contains various habitats that include alluvial fan sage scrub, white sage scrub, chaparral, and riparian habitat. Rancho Etiwanda/Henderson Creek Mitigation Area. This 308 -acre property is surrounded by the North Etiwanda Preserve and San Bernardino National Forest. The Site was part of the mitigation requirements for the Rancho Etiwanda Estates Project and the Henderson Creek Project. The 308 acre Site is protected by a conservation easement. The above conservation areas total more than 3,000 acres and are managed primarily for species and habitat values. The project will result in the loss of approximately 25.48 acres of scrub vegetation that is a functionally isolated remnant of a historically broader extent of alluvial scrub vegetation, namely RAFSS, associated with the Etiwanda Fan and the Day Creek wash. The habitat at the Project site has been disturbed over the years, such that the site is dominated by California buckwheat, giving the site the appearance of alluvial scrub vegetation in an earlier stage of ecological succession. However, due to the extent of development and flood control improvements, the project site is functionally isolated from the degree of flood scour that would be necessary to naturally sustain characteristic RAFSS habitat in the future. Further, residential/commercial development and flood control improvements over time have eliminated the majority of the alluvial scrub vegetation south of the 210 Freeway (as well as north of the Freeway), leaving only scattered remnant patches along the Day Creek Channel and in a few other locations. Rev 3-1-16 P695 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: pp g Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact North Etiwanda Preserve. In 1998, the County of San Bernardino created a 763 -acre conservation area in response to impacts to AFSS from the Foothill Freeway (SR -210) project. The Preserve and surrounding lands also contain significant amounts of other rare and threatened habitats that include Sycamore Alluvial Woodland, California Walnut Woodland, and Fresh Water Marsh. North Etiwanda Preserve Expansion Area. In 2009 an additional 440 acres of land was set aside for conservation purposes adjacent to the North Etiwanda Preserve and within the San Sevaine Creek area. Along with the original 763 acre preserve, these lands are managed with the intent of permanently protecting the alluvial scrub and other native communities and species that occupy the North Etiwanda Preserve. U.S. Forest Service Conservation Area. This 880 -acre conservation area is located adjacent to the western edge of the North Etiwanda Preserve and includes land purchased by the Metropolitan Water District along Day Canyon and Day Creek as mitigation for the MWD's Inland Feeder Project. The land has been transferred to the U.S. Forest Service and is a part of the San Bernardino National Forest. The majority of this conservation area extends beyond the City's Sphere of Influence, into unincorporated territory. San Sevaine Preserve. This 137 -acre conservation area was established by San Bernardino County as mitigation for floodwater diversion structures and debris basins. Day Creek Preserve. A 200 -acre conservation area was set aside through a conservation easement to the San Bernardino County Flood Control District as mitigation for impacts from sand and gravel operations. Tract 16072 Mitigation Area. This mitigation area consists of 335 acres that will be conserved as habitat mitigation for Tentative Tract 16072. This area is within the Day Creek watershed and contains various habitats that include alluvial fan sage scrub, white sage scrub, chaparral, and riparian habitat. Rancho Etiwanda/Henderson Creek Mitigation Area. This 308 -acre property is surrounded by the North Etiwanda Preserve and San Bernardino National Forest. The Site was part of the mitigation requirements for the Rancho Etiwanda Estates Project and the Henderson Creek Project. The 308 acre Site is protected by a conservation easement. The above conservation areas total more than 3,000 acres and are managed primarily for species and habitat values. The project will result in the loss of approximately 25.48 acres of scrub vegetation that is a functionally isolated remnant of a historically broader extent of alluvial scrub vegetation, namely RAFSS, associated with the Etiwanda Fan and the Day Creek wash. The habitat at the Project site has been disturbed over the years, such that the site is dominated by California buckwheat, giving the site the appearance of alluvial scrub vegetation in an earlier stage of ecological succession. However, due to the extent of development and flood control improvements, the project site is functionally isolated from the degree of flood scour that would be necessary to naturally sustain characteristic RAFSS habitat in the future. Further, residential/commercial development and flood control improvements over time have eliminated the majority of the alluvial scrub vegetation south of the 210 Freeway (as well as north of the Freeway), leaving only scattered remnant patches along the Day Creek Channel and in a few other locations. Rev 3-1-16 P695 P696 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00451 AND DRC2016-00508 Page 90 With mitigation measures listed in the Biological Section, the cumulative impacts are considered less than significant. C) Development of the site under the proposed land use change would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. The Initial Study identifies construction -related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact; therefore, proposed mitigation measures in the Air Quality Section are included and will reduce emission levels and cumulative impacts to less than significant. Additionally, impacts to air quality resulting from construction activities would be short- term and would cease once construction activities were completed. The Initial Study identified potentially significant impacts associated with the exposure of people to increased noise levels. A Noise Impact Study was submitted for the project that reviewed the potential interior and exterior noise levels. The report concluded that with the proposed mitigation measures (see Noise section above for detailed analysis and mitigation measures), elevated interior and exterior noise levels created by adjacent roadways would be reduced to less than significant. Cumulative impacts from noise would be less than significant with incorporation of the mitigation measures listed in the Noise Section. EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier PEIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply): (✓) General Plan FPEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified May 19, 2010) (✓) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) (✓) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989) (✓) Victoria Planned Community EIR (Certified May 20, 1981) Rev 3-1-16 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentiallyignifnt Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact With mitigation measures listed in the Biological Section, the cumulative impacts are considered less than significant. C) Development of the site under the proposed land use change would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. The Initial Study identifies construction -related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact; therefore, proposed mitigation measures in the Air Quality Section are included and will reduce emission levels and cumulative impacts to less than significant. Additionally, impacts to air quality resulting from construction activities would be short- term and would cease once construction activities were completed. The Initial Study identified potentially significant impacts associated with the exposure of people to increased noise levels. A Noise Impact Study was submitted for the project that reviewed the potential interior and exterior noise levels. The report concluded that with the proposed mitigation measures (see Noise section above for detailed analysis and mitigation measures), elevated interior and exterior noise levels created by adjacent roadways would be reduced to less than significant. Cumulative impacts from noise would be less than significant with incorporation of the mitigation measures listed in the Noise Section. EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier PEIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply): (✓) General Plan FPEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified May 19, 2010) (✓) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) (✓) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989) (✓) Victoria Planned Community EIR (Certified May 20, 1981) Rev 3-1-16 P697 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00452, SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00451 AND DRC2016-00508 Paoe 91 Technical Appendices (see disc) (A) Biological Technical Report (Glenn Lukos Associates, Inc; April 21, 2017) (B) California Gnatcatcher Surveys (Gleen Lukos Associates, Inc, April 12, 2016) (C) Delhi Sands Flower -Loving Fly Habitat Evaluation (Ecological Sciences, April 21, 2017) (D) Presence/Absence Trapping Surveys for San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat (ENVIRA, April 21, 2017) (E) Geotechnical Evaluation (Geo Tek, Inc.; January 21, 2016) (F) Parking Study (Urban Crossroads; March 14, 2017) (G) Arboricultural Tree Inventory (LSA Associates; May 2, 2016) (H) Paleontological Resources Report (LSA Associates; May 2016) (1) Cultural Resources Survey (LSA Associates; May 2, 2016) (J) Air Quality Impact Analysis (Urban Crossroads; July 19, 2016) (K) Greenhouse Gas Analysis (Urban Crossroads; July 19, 2016) (L) Traffic Impact Analysis (Urban Crossroads; April 21, 2017) (M) Noise Impact Analysis (Urban Crossroads; March 14, 2017) (N) Photometric Exhibit (Candela Engineering; August 31, 2016) (0) Peer Review of Biological Technical Resources, Gnatcatcher, Delhi Sands Flower Loving Fly and San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat (Michael Baker International; April 6, 2017) (P) Memorandum: Responses to Peer Review (Glenn Lukos Associates, April 21, 2017) Rev 3-1-16 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Technical Appendices (see disc) (A) Biological Technical Report (Glenn Lukos Associates, Inc; April 21, 2017) (B) California Gnatcatcher Surveys (Gleen Lukos Associates, Inc, April 12, 2016) (C) Delhi Sands Flower -Loving Fly Habitat Evaluation (Ecological Sciences, April 21, 2017) (D) Presence/Absence Trapping Surveys for San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat (ENVIRA, April 21, 2017) (E) Geotechnical Evaluation (Geo Tek, Inc.; January 21, 2016) (F) Parking Study (Urban Crossroads; March 14, 2017) (G) Arboricultural Tree Inventory (LSA Associates; May 2, 2016) (H) Paleontological Resources Report (LSA Associates; May 2016) (1) Cultural Resources Survey (LSA Associates; May 2, 2016) (J) Air Quality Impact Analysis (Urban Crossroads; July 19, 2016) (K) Greenhouse Gas Analysis (Urban Crossroads; July 19, 2016) (L) Traffic Impact Analysis (Urban Crossroads; April 21, 2017) (M) Noise Impact Analysis (Urban Crossroads; March 14, 2017) (N) Photometric Exhibit (Candela Engineering; August 31, 2016) (0) Peer Review of Biological Technical Resources, Gnatcatcher, Delhi Sands Flower Loving Fly and San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat (Michael Baker International; April 6, 2017) (P) Memorandum: Responses to Peer Review (Glenn Lukos Associates, April 21, 2017) Rev 3-1-16 P698 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2016-00452. SUBTPM19762, SUBTT20032, DRC2016-00449, DRC2016-00450, DRC2016-00451 AND DRC2016-00508 Pace 91 Less Than Signiricanl I Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: petenually Wth Than 8lpniflcant Mltipatlon SgnlRcanl Na APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study. I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures. Further, I have revised the project plans or proposals and/or hereby,kgree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point wlWMclpno significant environmental effects would occur. Applicants Signature: — Date: Print Name and Title: !<`�l• �C �f -yT']^ fJ Rev 3-1-16 ►. Q m v L'c 02 c E O r U U � c m O V V U) Z N N N N N N r 'C C RD w y N l0 C O 0 -0 O t w > a a a a a cn C: U cn cn cucu cu m c a a a. a a 0, 0 0 0 0 0 N N ? E d > > > > > P > C V O a) c O 2 LL U U U U U 0 m .c Lo c c Qo L a a a a a C N CO O fl L L U) C 0-0.- 'C a) to .0 — C to a) L N '= m-' u) a) a L "0 a) — O) L a) C a) U m C a) U O ` a) c �� E.3� >,Y mac} Ngo O c Or 0-c :3 C 3a C .� L C v_) viL3 Qv) N m N �aa))N� c� C L cn L mm: p to C:U >p t v'� � N a) U O C U` U E Q1 C Qa) m M m m a)—JL � C C U a) 0 � a c N O Cu a) � Mn O U a E --� 'O — � � m a) (Np N— m � a) O p j f0 U C cn fn c L a) CO m a) cn > .0 N cq (n 7 C0 in y m a) E c c v L O C U U W 2 v L_0 °)� 3 0+' m a) m a a0 c 2 m �'Fu o c moo c`o�0a) ��� a)a)a= — � ,�0- a)> cn Q Cv� (Z' U Q m L N C � Y rCU ` m0 E C E U U N �0 C 0 La) Q rn mm E oa 3 rn'o �v m U a) O= N o �- N O L a) 2-�— a) 3 N Q U' L 0 c O '` C N E m o = O .` m 0 E N O +` �" 7 O M m vOi L ; C� U af)) cm m.0� rnEpw > ai o �� > �� m cLu� 0 c a) c 0 0 m °w O d I M E C. w C .` �a m cmi cm)� c0) m a) a E m a o.—>_'E c0i m e U U a) 0� O p" O a) O L U cm o cu v 6 E C a) f• 7 p () U U — X X L Q a) a) O s c L m O U O F 7 0 0 0 O-- C O N d C L Q .0 O a) O E d O CL 0 (n L \ N cf u7 C) N O a) C) m a 21700 0 N 4- O N a) tm co i d U L � O c E O U v c ccc o v v v v v cn Z N N N N N N N N N 2 r a 'c a) w d a) m > O C O r a ca 0.0 M g> U a a a s a a a s cn cn cn cn cn U) cn En c m m e m c o a a a a a a a a a. •�o O= O O .� O w O 4 O O 4--4 O O .� O CM_ ) m T m T)) T) Ap T) E `m a) a>) a>) ai ai a>) a) m a>) i=> c� T: C O a) O C tT O ` �LL U U U m U U U U U CD m O C c O O Q CL m L m m m m m CL m a m N @ 0 U N Q � L >+ t C p L 7 .0 L a) c0 � C 7 0 Ea 3 .N a) 0 y � L) 3 co m c w. O m °" E o° n 3 fl- -- a`) �3 a) '3 cco E CY x<(a 3 co_° crn a) o Q p N n U Vl a) E O L cn —_ O- O cn 0 a " U U E 2 O' •`-� E a p C a cn _� c 0 C C 7 L 0)'4-- O a) a) O .- U "O a) C a3 _7 C U ) r- (n ° cn 0) O O a U Q a) C O a) O > .'-' a) a ` a) C .�- c0 t b N � 'C Q a) a) .0 a) a) y cn p ° O w U a E C C C N U C O C � (� a 7 a) Q' a) Y-., - E a N — y c0 �,y > O L C d c0 E a) +. Q7 a) p cn •- O cn cm N p a) - cn V) N a) _O (D O L L O U Q) N N� > (pj Q 7 a) b +� a) N p C a +_ .r O cn m O n U y CoLa) ` � p c0 a) a) U Q x — p U u C cn a) C j O p O O +� a) �CM c0 >+ w E 0 a) p— y0 c0 •� L a) U Q U � (�( L v a O E t O a) C V a = +�+ j p O C ° U ° "'' E Q U ` a L to O C O — N m .� Y C U N a cO c Ensc OL O cu �. cot 0) a) O O U N c .= a) O O` j A_- CU _w U O 0 0 0 O �O a) +. a L Q O D7 U) >, _ CL a° Z to U co — cis_ —� 4--0M 0 m o �o O ca °�� cc a) ° 3t E•E C co c' >, o m co ��� c a a Cc>,m ._. w e n c v) E aa) U a) 3 L EU o c`a., m —a Unarm m c ami cn p a rn- c c) m > �� (U C: ns m Q �- OYa c t `s U � �t ; 3 y rn�s tom- 3 �:? v, 0 a a`) c a) a U O: -- U tm co 3 c o ax a >1 !_' N >, cn . O O L O :� a) ` N +� Q Q U v1 .. c O t L p +. — — c= N a) M - C O cn cn ` - cn Q w •` cn U O a) cn a) () N a) d c �._ U" a) U p .N m U O> "'E�°)y2 a) m CLcaa p a) UUE c U N a) o� E E O O Qas N cu a) cE�a L O t n �Uo cU ca w� a) c +. a)pca U 3 > N m a° m vUi N t>> a > c =,� p �a a� cn ° �,nQ a) a c o C (j c - a) � ., U � o Q a) c O v)a Ca (D co 0 0• N O -'C Q a) O ; d L = o co — w CL c E o O O � coz N v v v v It v v v N c -v 'o 'c d� 'L w m ca >p c o O t m L U g> a Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q c 0 c 0 c 0 c 0 c 0 c 0 c o c O U c cn c U U L U L U L U L U L U L U L M CU L =fl LL /l I..L cn c cn r_ cn c (n c U) C (n c En C 017. m o ocm U U U U U U U U 0 =y=,� 'G' 3 3 0) C rn C 0) C rn C rn C cm C 0) C m C L > > •L •L •V •L •L •L •L •L i. H> a) W a) Of 3 p 3 p 3 p 3 p 3 p p 3 p 3 p C1 T c U 'L C O N cr O ` �U- U U U U U U U U U U cm d = 73 LO w O O CL 2 aa)) L O O O O O O O O O O W.2 m m m m m m m m m m a) — � c -o C m -0 ` CM 4-- 3 O C 0 r rn p m C g 'o ` a� ` p O` r L a) .. T o c o -a— •— M N C C ton 'o o.�`° .0 ��� m rid m> 000 cu � �Ea m•E m � N p N(U cn � U o H. m a) Q �°�� a) Q O' a) c CLv •� Y > O U to a) N to E L '� X a) O N o� Q a U .. m c > d .. 0 O cu (0 O to E U O O_ C M O f0 'O c U t0 m 3 C ''' 0.9 p _ a) L N r-.. T C 3 fU "0 ` '_�. a) tq m O 3 Y E X 3 a) � " 0 u) ,� p 3 c (n to +, C 'O U Y O U M O U � U 0 a ` m to o U a) — cm _U Q O O O m o m m> "cn � a a) N .0 O > +T d U _ m a) N Q E C N O "mac O U� UO -o.`—.-4-- U �tnL�N to 30� m t�n`mo co= �'a`ni m N (nn a) a r N •` a) O 7 C U a) 0 Q N c 0-0-0 a) Q 3 s Q 3 U d E N m a N (UO vi c U a) cn a) X > a) 3 i O a'�.c 0 3 0 M r- U C- c a) 0 U m.c O c U a) 'c (0 .c m ` N 0 — U ++ O �d U N Z N~' �U (n ca m L o C i cn c y a) ` a)" 3 '3 rn c a)+ - o` N N o to cri ''' CO to c}o +3` 7 a CL a) '� a) Z _ f0 O m N a) ,� a) a) m (0 -0 (n N c - Q) a) N cn N f0 3 a) p) m >_,._ � N N O C s t7 •y - 3 U O_ jR 3 3 "O ` D N y C m O C C kz t M m 0 .c •0 •" C7 C C w — CM (0 N -0 tOn C U (D E 3 0 m cy N U U i N C1 Q U 3 cm N O "0 N aCL ) .O —O > o a) U CIL,.;r fl 'O m o m C L N O N co m a) U W y .� N C ` o a m d1 c O .0 C UE3•-U(n Q. O N U a) a) m` 3 T L — a) U a) 3tn>Umo 0 C C N 3-cn3 .0 O fU T co �mNC m m p � OV^g p .— — C ��L m f0 p a) U Q m to L Y c .— (n (D O p m 3 fn a) o O (n 3 N �' LaE(nn;��>d od'Edc} F- a) 4) N -a6 3 m -0 cC O d (D —0O :�Q U ui a)Q m U= E o�'amU O 0+.� of (D L d E O c a (n CU U) s c UU)ca._m O J c a) aa)> L a) a> U mo �m r r r r �- P701 C) N 0 a) 0) N 0- a) o m c E O U v M O M co M I V U) Z moi' T N N N N N N 20 r 'a C d y N l4 >o Q Q Q a C O r m O v 'i U 2> Q a U U CC: c c 0 0 0 0 U _ U _=3= U U to C rn C cn C cn C N C y c +I +L. I= m m m m m m _ !n C cn c to c U) C a a a a a a O% U U U U o 0 0 0 0 0 °)U = rn rn rn 0) 3 3 3 3 33 r= c c c c U a) N N a) N E ` •= a _ m :3 = :3 (1) C � o C U 'L C O d r � cr O d 0 2 L U U U U U U U U U U d O N r E- 0 0 0O CL g aa)) O O O O O 0 0 0 O O E° m m m m m a a a m m C E L a) m "O O to m— _ cn to M a) = a) C U — a) to m L to — m L O C +_ +-' '- L O 'O ''' _ +- c — ' m� N — a) m C m+ rn m O 3 O O cn (D O` m= ., U NCL w vi 3 -O U) 3 O= y 0 U tLq m rno ° m O m cco aXi v, o Y•�•� c`n o � cTi.m W p > c CY)a) m a) p +� N 'C C m O- N m Q' U) j U Q j m E L O a U U O = M N_ Q N L) fo C V a) V> a) U cn _ U U m _ � U = a) a Q = U O7 C p U 0 O U U Y •- O Y O +� a) U C N a)� m U `� a = }. a� 2 U) m U-0 m N _— c U L _ U L c `�- L_ uj ?i O a) O O +_ N ('� `) a) (� i CL aC) .. a) NC Y L O 2 L m N N 0 N `p Q T '- Q Q in _ Q c U Q CC m Q "O CC m a) a)CL a) C E a) E _ U E 0O N -6 N (a w O m O aO C m C— C Tm U � O CL L O U O C O U m O t .a3Occ�)a Up U) m m Q yU M -O Oui M in p c='O mO 0 a) C O a) N . O y _Z C C 0 U m U m C O () pEE= CL M O m a) , O U a)4-- Uo pr . N = mo A 0 m a) aDMQ° a) Q cn o NC: IM.= N cn — '0 E O O E a) m U I y m rncO 0= =3 4`Q` m O am . m O L D. = 2 c' -p " m O C N a' 'a Qm N N O C a) CL -a .Va) in •5 OO C t Q to to O to c c U m 'OU U J-6 U an 0fn Q Q QQU U aO Q-0 m Q - N N �- N N 04 N N P702 O N O NT a) m m CL a) U om m a c E O r V R O ? cn Z N N N 20 r � C d :_ y d m > C O Z -0 m 0.0 L m� U �> U a cn C tn C m cU � w. O a 4-- a 0 O o ) E `m m H> a>) C V C C O O Li U m o� ° c `o Ur C C 0 O m a UEn Mo o ° mcn o�°mm� o � -0 c v 0 cn o 0o o c 'NC coCL) .p �- >'ocu c m -p oo :3 r -L "t O ��v a) > N E > O O 7 m� c 0} y 0 C m. U a) " U� DO '~ o �_ m N ai U cn a) cn v a p U 7' 0) — a) 0 U� N >, Q c w� o ° a) V) w7 Y L c .� a) rn_ o° U) c E C L' y +-' C_ O 0 `�•- m m 'C E m Y "a C- a) � m U ,E _ 0 N .0 > 3 L a) m m cv — " m a) p co a) cn p a) E-. E> O cm + � U t W ° 0 E � ° c Op � a) .� 0 ° .r- >'0_ L L a) a) U 0 .0 O >, c J -- � c a) � m= o N-0cL mo NL m m to cn-0 3 � C' C U a) 'd a) 7 - o E m.o �,_0 Q U a) O > �= >' L ''' > 3 C U `, a) ` L — a) w E co E °. D O C �co)aa)CD O N +> 0 00 Ua C Com, C m� >,w o �� a) rn � E �� m °-�a m mca) _r_ 03: Q r- w� v)mmEc i3�c �paVa)� O M CD U CM m Z E — ma L Q ` L C ` O N O •C a) •c L 0)— a) "0 .� C O -0 O > � cn +� m U 'ocn 0 L` U CU m Ln CD m N= 0 0) tf 0 i� 'C � C� m .� O tn i- a) co O U c 0 a) M M rL- 0 0) cn cn v0- N_ �_ L O L cm •� a) cn O L � w a) Y O m m� N a) C oma CD d) a) 0) T 7 c O L L Q L m ° cn '0 ca CO C -0 a) L a) C C C a) } a) a) o v) CD cn me �£.0-0 O o -° c =m• —Ln cn 2) N M o m >'vs a) a) E >� m o ��- ami a) - C: C 0 ca) 7 E -' C U C ++ E ry 7 a) O U O m O Q) c, m 7 O cu p C O N L j a) 'C ''' 0) j 0 O> c9 E a= •� ) .0 a) L Q L N 0 En 0) L am; c E C +L+ _= V_0 Q L C U` O p a O fl a) 0 -0 a) L O V A a) +. 0) O a) D O_ C 0 7 a) cn N U cn : m �QUN— •- C Q� m o. :,_ m C p _ a) 0 > m O C O y m a) r- L 7 p a) a) C a) O I- o cn� DO m.SL_.�._.r'v " c m .rte 3 U�.vO c U E N in .- P703 0 N 4- 0 LO CD rn m d L � o1° EU) E o U m O fn Z M y 'G C d � y m 0 C O r 0.0 M L c� G C .� o O = CM m CU 'LC O d = 7 Cd O rL U- d O C C 0 O 2 N 4 L C Q •- c O m c a) N C C +—N Q a) C rn� T s w Vl a) -op '~ LO L� ~ C 10 O c- N m O Q. L m L m O >' � M M Q c N Z �' 3 p] 7 OL •• 4- CMr- O U O O CM N 7 t U U a) O N O U ` U C O N (0 N O a) p f0 co cn 7 L •= M O p X C: U O " p a) D O O D >, N p O c Y — O( L U M a) E O U N p a) U >. O ` U Ch 7 N O U L aS � d �' >, C U ~= a) c a) c 'Q a) 7 O +' O -q) O CU ca �'.' O O L a) 7 3 E a) .0 +- O m ~_ a) C.9 U t m U �' U U a ''' _p E U t U •_ (La � cn a) a) m = a) O c.) c � o L U C m m E .'C_+ U D O E O a) F-- Cf) E m N L O 0 •s .0 �' O V O O E L p L') m E .c D 3 Qcp,,"�} in ` a c Tx c� c�'v n mN c p co E,r - ccu >; o> o o m p �} �� a) ��� o a) To r+ m e a) !_ N m E E> to c '� ? c N> U cv >+ a) (0 a) L= N U .� Z m m L.L 7 a) �' to a) a) n �- = m a) Q U O a) Z L •Q O r Q. C co :_. c0 c 3 O w c N a M i— O (n Off. m 0> Z C' a N m C •3 N O rn Q U r u c O 0 0 = '� - c 0 0 3 c) E o c w .. to O 0 N Z C U) O L �' I L a) O E a p m-0 .— _ cn c C a) 00 En p t O 7 u U 0, L O L 0 c) L S U 3 as c o �, o p a) � c c�? o 0 o c c UO C O v, 4-- a) C p p m C m T L (0 Y L 0 C ,«- N p 0 0 0 -6 C p N p m 'o o 0 a) E N a) L N a) L 7 V N Q rL c + (p C U) C N 3 c N O U Q+ m ,_ to -0 a) ,L, a) C_ a) a) N c E N a) 0� a) d L a U p w >, O, c a) `� �� +� m � U N O c a1°i a� �«' m c L M 0 3 MM-= o L 3 L c`u CD (D U o 0-0 ° �' cm — 0 o `p'~ �'� fa cv v ° :g Qa):3 �� o a" o c m� �o o m ''p vci �', m wLo�:3 ��LUIUL�La) ��n� _m1 omt: c_ ;_ Q M m .o Z Of O a U-0, O O E o U o to a a) O m to Q L pVJ�ECi p Ea U�� oDy cm (n i:. � E P704 a� U ` C O 0 c E O O �U o m v v U) Z co M N lC r VC N � d L_ a+ a) m > 0 C O 'p m O U L w 4) D �> a a 0 0 C O .- O'0 0 O O c U 3 3 w m a) E `m a>> a) F_ > 0) >' C U L C Od C� O L_ 2 LL. U U m O C C O O C2 m m 0' w d IL u) C > C E O L "O O O (n a) a) 4-!> O L p 0 0 0 O C L = a) m Vl a) "'' a) a) O m L m a) - .� Y0) C V7 N p m= O " U U O 7 N m cn Q a) Cc� «- O O C L .0 p) : O L m a) CD U= CD U N 6 �. ° N CO M m CA vOi a) O- cn C2 ° � En ° o 0 x L a) O m 0O C n 0� V y vi CU •> E 4_ fA U U N � .� m 0. N u) p E L O 7 m CD 0) ` M (D CT U n O a) 3 N L CD E O p C O 0> L + ` a) _ CO > L •p a) cn U ,� O y— U :e S-0 > a) (n L u) 0 — CL m C rL. a) m> N 0:3 cn c cn C L L m U 0) C u) CA O 7 N m "p 7 }, 'a • N U O m C O "O m 0_ m 7 p 0 � 2 .2 O a) u) 0) > m cn N U L `� C N . O 2 N C=— C C= 3 O Q m C C a) .O m E CLU' m O: C O .0 L p O p a) U a) E a) N 7• L p O a) V) ` 30 = L L O a) a) N M U O � 0 m '� en � y = O u) .� > O N O •n 0— E u) U L m N C -p O U N O CT N C a) � m L r p C W U C CM 0 a) U _ a) 0 'p a) C m y 0 CD "O �� >cn ' c cu U S m L M .0 7 0 7 N 7 > O a) m •O C ,_, u) w fn -p > "6 O 'O O uJ 0 0 0 a) N_ N i to �= U E - L °r ' p n C C C— m � O U a) �• .— ... Cl) a) -a 3cn Q 0 LL N u, ` +L.• ` C m a) u) Y � .0 m n � a) - � a) c N N O. 7 N � m O �, C m a) C O s c '7 (n � C d CA _C O O (D U a) C > L m w �' '' p) M C E ''p � L •C U c�0 'o c. N p p U � U p- C O O >, C O O C C .2 o_ CL 0 W 7 to O m p Q a) p 0 U to CL .M—+ C C O .n C O C '=' 7 a) n u) Q) ' O m >, .0 C L (n m� m m 3 rn LL _a a a� u) 3 U E 0z m tC) m O a) E L m CL d Eo `- a EL '� m -p - m=_ m 3 • E P705 0 N O CD m a. d U o 2 4- a c E O o +� U U C c=a O U) Z cy) N M v N 10 'C C d zz- d '� a+ a) m C 0.2 m O V .«- L .+ �> a s a a a a o a 0_ C .= CL -O O a O O O C V O O O _ N N N v. .N a +`� C) T C V O N 3 o m U LL U m U m m C) m o N 0 o p CL m w a 0) rn` -o `Cocccac U) a) a j 'C a) a)Ya)ma) m a) ` m U C c- 0) 00 oCYao o o c -0 c a) 0>00 Y 3 a) V .d a) O- a) ` O O= C a) •C = U m �• m E •C O U O m C O p 0 0> Ca C m 0 Q. O> O =O cm O.. Q Q o O O C O O E ca 0 0 E E Q C) o O) O 0 a) E o a) -0 cn += += E E 7 cm } 4) m N M Q L cu .� O U N= AQ m c a O vi a) a) U c Q C N Q_ v=i 0 E O E m O L= �� C O o U '' p a) c c o Y O Q 4l Q C m U a) m - E N vp.3 N=*> a) OL Y N � O C> c O U CU 0-0 U i N a? m U _ m Q op 3 0 CO a) Y U Q m L a c a c— �} '��Lo a) m a) a) cu (Do Q ca n o c Mn E m �� �� c c cn Q= = o o� OY fl - C N rno Y'o w 'C --a (Ya C C N— U= p �) Q cq C p U O D U p N y O m 7 a U cn U> O p a) a) •m_• C a) ol O C Y +- E O "- o E m U � m C L +. a0 o C E p p C m C) w O C =' m a) a> 0 a) a) y C m p N a) -0 O vi Y0 3 m 0 ,m .m m O m U C Y CM (D Q Q p m C O Z,U m C%4 U j � m a) .O O U X Y Q. :t: L C -O O r O m .cn E O p 0 L L) Ocn w m to 'c p C a) O E L m C j C p m ,>—_ O N CL U Q Q to C _ p Q_ Y in Q m O N (a m C C m m Q Y m O Q p p 0� C= C U,, � C'Q� 2 E C a) mp cn 3 a) m C m p a C o a)=p m'�.a).� 0 0 m= �Y Q Q C 00 s 3 m CD a m C m > O (La O p w C N O O) -0 iii rn a) 0 >+ Z d �` N N O C U L ` += N m j !_ a) Q d Q �_ O j O m .0 C a) d m IL U) Q m .0 m fn O E E .0 E m T m rn ,`, cn T E cn E O _O � Q m O 'o .0 O O = E - Mm -Doom Y C U m m C m C Q U 0 m 0 C 3 0 �� � � � Y C 0 '�m'CO'UEV1°'°'EYE. E ) �� I1 E 04 P706 a� U L C O � w Q. c E o U c c m O co Z v ch M v V A Ag r a 'c m, m 'L a+ y m >� c o m o .3!L- �> a o o Q Q Q Q c 0 c 0 c o c O � t: V U U U U Q a QL L L L C� 0 � � cn C to C cn C En C o � 0 0 0 U 0 U U U ua ) m m m m m E 'L > > > L 'L 'L F— > 0 tm C U 'L C o a) cr g li m U U U U rn m .c `O N O O CL 2 IA L m a m m m m ,° n CL) r-2- L 0-0-0 C (0 'C c0 a) ° a) i cn N O a) c0 CL'= c0 O L a) N U -0 c0 'C `° t odyoc) N>,o 3Ecn c c ai cn (0 °°'" a) (0 (y0 a)o Q U N " Q vi ° U c0 .0 rn a) >, a 'E o C N U Y O O C> a) c0 U U C L U C U o a) ? O c0 W U) m ,C -0 a) ' E� off ° E a C .� > d +. s c0 m � to E m ° � ° C >+o a)'C D aci °� ams m .� 3 L _ C N C U` O C c O a C O c`0 + �° 2� c0 a) d , as - cn L a) Q N N O .� Q a) a) a) U p CD U� cn a C O ~ , > c 'n (n .� E cn a) 7 N(D a) C C) O O C v-cm L O a) C p a) O C U co 3" 7 —0 O_ cn Q p 0� a) cn t O .. N to tot 2 O E2 to f0 to O O >_ ` O a cn Q C 1 O �' O U� N O N c0 ` U a) � U) a O N L C N m O Q a j U a O C cn N O O O L p E '' "O a) � � (n .� cn a) a) U° Q U a) p _ � U O cn C1 Z N U y a) C-0 M M c->,° c -r-� a c E03a C c6 b O rn a) cm.- =3 U o "- to °� rn c L 0X� N ���o N C L O a) E O T a E c0 to U c N� (0 C 3 O � c0 d C) c a) O d t 7 U C) a U-0 w > O Q) - E p CO L to = U C c a) C cn cn U CU O" N Q Mo O a > C) " p a) w E a) O cu >O cn O` m U 'V m 0 N .- C cn .N N �= O U C c`0 a) O `. OL a) .N U _ U O vi m "' C v O 0 cn O E `o U a) a m � c0 Q N d c > o a'n > m co a) j a o 0) a)a)U�a)a)O c (0 C cn . U .� c d£ c0 cn (n cn (D L m< O m c° a) N'a cc o ig c U >+t c Na v°i EL v U•N—' m E • • • p ice— cn cc a .0 Q c°n ti m U > > U 3 d a) U ..0 N tm CL E U Cl) N ch v P707 a� U L C .CL w C E O U C C m O co z v v v v v N v O is a a 'c m, •L m w m ca >0 c o am 0.0 t L S �> Q Q Q Q Q Q U Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U U U U U U U U :3 :3 =1 =3 =3 :3 =3 o a O U O U O U O U O U O U O U O U �0 '� m m m m m m m m •L 'L L L L L L L L > 0 0 C U 'L C O a) _cr 0 L LL. U U U U U U Q U CD m .0 O C C O CL L m m m m m m m m •• •• N m m "O m C C C a) Y '-• I >, c = L U� U ca a) L 0 a) '0 .0 ` O — O C .0 O a) a) fn -0 >,'O -0(n f0 C U C ca 70 C C O CO = 3� �:N fl —` p 0 Q3'3 .r E —o o — —D•c ca c 3 0 m m o0 `� o is •y N— a) � Q . to cn vmea) c c a) c p m3 U Q c mr- I N cn c O ,r cn >, � E •=cc ca --o = L —omOEI '� to c0 c v) >,O U�'E W /ymtno L d C — .O Q 0 •O m U 3 C m Ia 0--0 CD 0) 3 cr �' 7 ++ C a) a) in E 0 O cn to O O U >` •y U (a U U t - `a O a) U� U CCL) •C p U a) O U' to L_ E fn U C O U C L N C La) O Q a -0 C O W �-a L)` ca L v O c Mn L M_ 3 +L•' L d U O O C= c 0' C E `,� U "a = E 7in C C 0 N ca E .,,, a) >,C'3rno00 C M LO c a) N a) U m��,�° o W cn C p C L 0 ` E U 0 fn .. 7 4_- C N L C a) O U 0 .0 N a) L .r (`a C` C 4 --N U C+ 0 C C fa N 0 CD N .— U �n C a) 0 0 O C U m v� .c aL) U E '0 C fa O cc O L a) rn -0 3 O v t c 0 m O p O 3 O O ca } c> N a) a) Z3 y m'0 " >, — C_ Q. m Z5: cco aE C C 3 +-' U •� :0 m� O m ca 0 Y � C to CO E m U m a �} •E Z N 3 � ca 3 U E R >, o 0" cn (}a _ to a) U— E a) .. O Q w a) p a- o N L O -0 N C N a L L C p C O m 3. fn a O i O 0 U E U U 0)L U C 3 fa O .:3 C a) 7 3 a) In a ca C O CL ca O c ch -O m .� a O 3 U N Q C a) ''' C .`-• '� U d U O - C M- 0 C U fn O w- Co :3 L c w- a) 4) — L a)M C O- 3'c m ca C �, E C �_ N N C a) 3 ca _ 7 ca 0.0 ami�� a`� o.Ec rn o c��a �' >•��' +7 3 Uoma)0-6CD E cC� �� �— _0ami(D m °��Lcnc�n U`0 c m �NNo3E w Y� ia� Eoc U) `n CL I� c ° cmc O a) I- p L cn E O a) m N O E C ca O a)Fn N .- �= m p 0 j 2 01 c0 U)-0 a)} c p O m ca ca a) 7 U Eo CO Hma)v cam HUNm -0 I— Q3a) U.E Of UaP E3� �m.5 ��= Q U jj E fn N ch LO O r 00 P708 O N O O r CD ca d d om 0 a E O U m O fA Z N N r 'O C d w � N lC > O C O Z -0 m O U t �> U c 0 U 7 cn C U 0 O 4 t� U v Cn E c E C1 � C U C C O d rr � C cr O ` U- Q cn d O N }' C C 0O 0M r. O� y0. m Cn O C Cn C O L O cn O C "O O C "O C O 0 C' L Q CA cn L c M T O uj cn -a c +•-� in O tn O '— N c .O 0 U +� cU cu U (U O cn Q f0 cu �, cU N N -0 N 3 (U � U UEL C O �} O U co N "O N U U 0 N T 0 M- U N CU N cu + o a cn 0) (U m cn.Q) o C Q V p J a O N� iU N 3 3 7 c cn cn N CU U cu :� p� 00 #= Q n y cu > o L L N a) 0= CL C L E N ` o o c fU 'U L .� N_ c (D N (U fU cU = o cu rL 3 C U fU 0 C �' O Cn }o 0 0 0 O U t L m E " W L "_ E .� — N U C 0 0 O L 7 O C °3 C Cn.� > 0 m M D1 cn U> o ��` rn x c ami `o `n U`�' m �� 3v� N 00�.�� �c rn O N C a CM c C CM =_ L L 0 0 '�O N� L N C L (U Ncn •� U •0 O O L�� (U C U L c p 0 Z 5 N cu CCU W Q U L=cu 0 L' Q L T Q --C, cu .0 L + L cu G1 0 c M o N CDN N U +�/ O Q v N N N Q N cn cn m CU v L c cL° vi a� (QU a N cn rn o 0 to «- u Q o 3 c c o U U- U pn U 3 N Q m cn N O r? E Q o Q U N a E E -ffi — N CU 0 cU ,c O .cu E o — -0 a N} c ,U C S c j cm _ cU C o Cn > N C co)C 7 C (U U N a)— > (�U D Lu T N 2 cu cu C CA U U •L N .L.. CS cu N CU Q fU C E 3 aci MLv, v>i o �� a� �.� c°�UO D 3 �Q o.E m� D O 0) w 1110 U ++ O • • • • • • • d cn .c • • • • � d E rn 709 O N O N CA cu 0- a� o AR c E O o �U c (cv o v a fn Z N N N N N 2 a� a C a) C v_ y d m > 0 C 0.2 'p m O U M w > U a a a c cu m c o a a a a - 0= o 0 0 0 = w .(L) E `m m a) m a) F- > 0� cn >, C V C C O cm U U U Li Q m m m tm �2 `o U) O O a� m m U m -0-0-0 a) C C C— U N O) C T to a) cn (D .c c O a) U a) s `. '' 'D U a) O1 � — ° T a) T L •p U a) "= C O m E C C .� U C- O` L O +' N N N U = «�. U � > a) N N a) 1 � C � _ � � � N � U m Q Q O C p US a) O O to c o- W -c VI 7 +. O = m d d O 7 z m o a) 'n ° n a) •� a) O Q u) - C C L a) (0 N o L y E Q Q O cn C° Q j U (o a) (n O C a E Q) - o° O O E� o L U _a n N y p o y tn `� 3 ' ,r > C y p T ��>CL E o c 0 N Q a) C`= `0� v, o rnco a 5 a or 3� to o E o 0 o2 U d t o aa) N ca C U O a) m 0 En Q vB O U m d� ca to O (0 a) N N - (n m 7 L) v` (0 O rn U) °� .p o E� co d O a Q .0 C N N a) _� a) c 6 f9 T C " " •c_ N Q.c Q c (>`0 0— Z a) Na) C `� : N c CMEn a c c o (u n �a •� +upi ,r o a) f ,_� U) +C. E c (j -p 3 0 m e O 4-- "a -p p CY)pp) a) rn C `) N m ° 3: ° c`0 � m T O h m (a Q d a) L C n m c O N _ to o �, -p } a) a) U t O E L N C En E U s Q ° c to (D to ° w 'U N X Q to C L '' N .p 0 a) c ca p C 0 p H a) '� O Q¢ Cn C N p Q n y -r-C p (D L U) O` 3 a)� Q (a O O m +. 2 E a n N U N_ 3 ca to U -D-0 � d L3) C Q) ` o o ..0 = ''' }, c c to p cn p O` a) CO O Q L O N O C C C C wO'cc E a) a) fl T L) I rn p Nd�-'c. p E (U > c ? N x -6..co w sem• a(n.. �. m�C 7 .. (0 to > p 7 cn o p) to CL°o0o° c(oa)'cn �`hmo oa)a)a) E Xd Ix a) rnaa)) c u •cam m°m a a0d 200 c��a)2=T a)E Q.6 ° E a`) ("o 5).S m c°) Q(co CL v 3 0- m a �d o y CL ii g c fn U N M P710 0 N 0 N_ a) rn m CL a� L = o M c E O 0 r o m v v U) Z N N N N N Ag r a) � a) L V d) m > _ O U = w > a a a a cn cn m = O a a a a. O Iz 0 0 0 0 ca) E L > > > > d (L)W a� m L'A >, = U 'L C O d = m U O U U Li m m m m L'A m _ O fA O O a� L m m m m � D Y 0) U L _C o _C C� YCG a) m �O Y •O t c }' m u t t C L a) 3� V }J N Y Y L Qi 0° 0 0- �' m i t N L Y M �- O m 0 f -U > a) W L C N ,c 7 o C O)'O C C) 0) m— x 7 Z 0 O cn a) C o Q N "0 t O N O 3 CL C,) p a) QOC Oa�"U nL a) = Z p a z p E E and j� N Q.o C E C O o O (n N c a) (n 'm 0 c E 0 Q N 3 L U o) O v 0 N N w t m O Cc 7 a ,, C L L C '� t � v �� co a) +) +, N .N > N tCU C m rn N� L O J. C OCl a) E N O p in p).c m E a) U> c 0 c '3 c0 0 p U > O ' C m 'X - N C C > a) in m � � N 'm Qat co N m> (n a) E N d � � > N E cnL •o a) a) '6 :�. (n (n m _ •� 0) a) C c '0 a E t 0 � E � -a � ui '0 c O- - O m p Q Z cn 0 a °) -1'j t "- n Ei 0 (0 'O m Q a c U a) ° a) O m Q cn t E L r- to �_p c co 7 0 +`- a) E O> c v N to C� > c0 .N a O N m — �_ N 0 O O L L a) .- a) a Y .� ^, V) W a) +•- O O a_ o f o c -'- Y ` U C U Y+ 0 (a m at- a) � C-) ` a) 4 Y > m 0 U ° � a) U w a) M Y d c 'O o E m U -0 ?) O a) p o L L Y m C N p 0) - N C r- t t Y ` C L m CO = Co p a) 3 O O ;, > t fl U U.0 U Y� L= Q a> C C a) E c t a. C) Y o a) =3 0 M 0 U E w c m N O cu U a) o (D -a E >,3 Z= ;. U 0) C C E p �,_ E m Q Y o f +L- a) U° D C .0 m m C N Q a d" O t L C 'c '� a Y e m "0 :o E >, N 0) O '> U aNi O b c m a) cn O .. c LL c N >, Z N � co N Y �~ .r m (D cum Q O = U �Q c c +- -0 " T aci o (n a) � O fn "O O c � z a)U ° o°0w b Co U N` C� c Y c C a. N ° °� a) `� °� c D Q) a) -_ c rn� m m U ° 0 > 2mp a) a) LU m �'a U E rn+- m o o N c 7 vM rn � .00 - Y M c`a sv L '0 U C N ' C U Z �_ .2 :t-- U U Y LO .Q U C C U 7 cu Y (n O N cn a) VI C m O a) U -0 7 O ,F O N> E C D Y O () p p a) a) a) p .O C C Q m O m cn O +` O C > a) .0 a) m SoL Y O L ED cn )— o 0 a Q� UDC�,�mc.�y a m0� Q� (n a(n U0 J c)L2 m m U m E G) d +, a P71 0 N O M a) rn cls (L a� L c o f° c E O U v c m O fn Z N N N N A N a+ 'O c a) C a) 'L i+ 0) m > O 0.0 M W< a Q �> a U U U Q c 0 m cc m m a a a a cn c 0 0 0 0 0 ° U E >m a� a) aa) (D H> m Q IM>, C u 'L C O 0 � Q ca) U Li m m m m U tm m c O fA 0- 2 m m m L �° m a a a m aac)(n aa))�o comeo�a) cn0c0)Uitn00o co _oa�oN �aoQCU °aci CL m ca 3°3� cn C�o,o�°�3m 0)0-5 t a O L v a) Q c N 0° 'j L co ° c O a) ° 0 L C a) (0 (n E y c y Q. a) C C N 00 >> O c0 N n 'o O E c a) a) a L O m a) c � M a) r 0 o 5,_ �� cn L o ° cu cn c CD cu � i f° -a o x Lcu sL cm me E n CD >, E '= (0 C b L m v= a n N C �. C 0 D7 Co E t E T Q c = N a) O O E D) z 'o ,� a) m '0 E � O (n vi O �O rn L Q d ° C a E, o;« ° °O (0 0 m o O c0 0 cnL >, c oUa E 3 cn — Q r..' .` — 0 cad C 0) a) a) f0 a - r— C E a O L) Ec0 v- a) N � 42 a) ,� .O a) Co C -0 E .tn L (0 a) O L > O 7 N 7 .��_ N U 7 Ca M C a O M C 7 cn C O O L a) co CD.—a) O C C N O N ` O w+ O O L a r C a) ,r (D o rn O_ C L O m O >_, Q C` 5 E O O N U U cn .N E t +_ U L a (0 N m C f0 .. O N C a) O � O� 7 0 r- Co L.. C x O C ca ` a) v_) O. co � E O O >,m m a ' ,rL+� a) C � ~ � rn fla N O O ` E � (0 a) > a NCL � (D E 0 0°" p— M L) O y U N V o 0 cn E 0 0 E 0 f0 a) = C a '.vO-- °' N a) L •O Y a) '� .0 a) .�. a) U 0 > a) cm (0 °" "� O C a) C- C C C O � U Q C C X a) T E N N cn 7 U a y N L n— C O C Q" 'C C O Co •c cyo 0 0 rn a) O O to O O d E d _ 01 -c 0 f0 7 0 m F-._a�w `- c x 111 .co � O `° , C a .0 U.�oasas� O .c a) U 2 V) Q c 03 O L Q.,- O 7 IL U w m o C a >> O C O 0 0 o to 30 m — 7 6 0 0 i rn a) c a ° C- E Cc, -,U a0 fn r N M P712 O N O rn m 4_ P71 a) U L c o CL c E O U:r U c m o v v v v v U) Z N N N N N N of r a c a) C a) La+ a) m > C O am 0.0 t ;� �> U U U U U C: cncn cn cn m m m m c o a a- a a a 0= 0 0 0 0 0 tm_ w ) m E ai m CD a>) a) aa)) i= > a) >, C V r- 0 O d Ca O L- U- U- m m m m m tm a) C O U) Ll N m m m m m L a a a a CL ` -p m ^ L a) "D cn a) a) m p Q,c 00 m .� — N m >, c a) -' a) C:—=— m O m m— (iiL) >, a) a) a) m e n c(0 y "D.Q-pU)�M Um N CD cn N � w- 7 "p L U CDca a) = C 3 a) N m j O a) O Q " a .D O O cn OJ ui c L c O , cn S N L p p .O C C) -0 .O C cn O—_ .-� U U c U N p) a) N C m m (a 'a rn U •• •fn — tNn U .� U E 3_1m U >3, to O L m U N a) a) "6 m m 9 cLa "O = N L v a) >. r cn cn m L a) cu C LO x v) "- Q U �= Q) o D) m a y •C p c O 0 c �3moa Ea��E Fn cu 'Fn o � E OO � C U � C O a) Uo 0 = " SCO O c C 3 Y � � O ca O � -0 B U t — � a) - U m L O " to m � ,� U E m a) m a) m EE D c U p 0 )`'�' a)u p +a -C aC a)p E2 E N m a) O3tca O , tC tDO U O U m pmn4-- C- '0U a) O _r_ -0 Y= ma U m CL U Z N C :�_ 'D 'p N E � >, Q N C C o .D X a) = C U n Lp m a) U N U m r Y c U c a) m C L. 3 a m L m m m m•Q .p .� m- cn m �)� �Q Q 3 °i rn� o c c 3 >,o 3 c Q m? c vi-pw m o �rn 4 a) a °o 3: -r- >'c� in aci .rte °� = 3.n-0 1 N 3 a� m mO m o Qv �� �� �� �� O >,� m— Qp 6,c: �*-, C C -op— �•E rnp �- U a� 'p D -- N vi 3: -,z m —_ ° t rn -a_0 aa)) O d c m to C_ c m a) c N c Q 7 L N. +. C c}a ,F m m E (La 3 a E m o O m rn O Q) m 3 m a) 7 m Q a) m 4) 'M O m U a) a) C p m c .� N U E m U O p p> m QI : mE 0.0 o cn U to cn w o m Q S ia m co I rl- ao 1 0 N O LO r a) 0) ca a_ d c o Ag U) a E O V v c m O v v v cn Z N N N N lC r c a) C w d 'r. a+ W m > c O r 'p m 0. v L _ �> U U U N w cn cco m cca C ° a CL a 0 0 0 0 co 0 N N ,c = •N E .� N N N > M c V C C d Ocr o N Li m m m Lm O O N CL m m m a) p ,N D .L a) V N y O C E C �+ ` '- a) a) � a) E L m a) 4 U a) U p (0 .�. (LO E p p� N 'O L U >' C O =' N p :C rL-.. +L+ 7 p t I- 0 X L E w co o rL-. O M S N > o L 'D ���o fn >1 m�c>,o3>, 7 +. EoWO�°� � ,C M to= �O C > �C� L a) Q o •rn U •fP cn C 0 c ao ui m p >, — N cn c� o o �-' O O �, p _rn .._. O N a) O O -0.- C cr N U p "C O O O 'a L a p L— L L D 3 O 7.- C O .--. p X N O L �. a) L W U a) U 7 cn L O to E +7.. C N 01 }, O C �.., 0 0 a� L I9 Q (a " � rn L .� a) 7 C p 3 C fn CU N N -0"mm U (UO Y Q p Q coE, N j U C i- N L3 C 0-U C-0�@ °' C rn Q w>.. o cn O o U a) 0 O U co n L O O W Q U)i •U CD N o o+p o a;cn a c>o rn:.t� �� •N cN0 Q E .�-' "� E o _-0 D C)_ (L) M iri - E >_ v>i > p m cU0 C 7 L ZC%j' — p .O �- X c}oi — O U O f9 (0 m w O tT V Q N a) C Q d U C rn 7 C N N C U N W Y U to to '� .N 7$ ,N Z= Y N T p a) >� C U p C 0 E •p 3 O O L '~ N O O 0 7 0 .� O (0 7 U 4; o< r+ o a) — w Q O a L' C '+., — L L U Ul a) C Z U H "O _0 C E a) O C C O U E .` Q L a) C co V +p-. N M N O O wQ L n .� �— N -a - Q `� n a) N o c m o a) w- O D 3 o °? 0 w Obs a m rn -0 o .Q L cL o �.r ea aciZ aci omuco>0 E o �= O c0 U C Y (0 E .) coC U_ v- O cn _C — — —3 CU�m Q m c0 fl W 'y Co O _ O a) � Q) �' E >_ r.+ C "O U a) a) +'CD W C } — Y U O O U U Y ((,a �.oQ a) fn L p a) O L ,� C L 0 H m co �w o c c o c a u'� a': o� �.o 3:>_ c}o.o m E> 3.5 m m cn d.N.S Q� o cu o coin �� aaCt Lh — = CL E O r r N � P714 O N O CO a) La d a� L O O r. E OU c c ,a o vn z N Ag a� � C d � d 'La+ d m C _ O r 'p m O v t - 'O � C w O O C ;F E H � C U 'L C O a) C LT O L LL CD d O U) .' C C O CL L 4 O C a) a) c o U N a) a N C a) a) O y L O a)CL) 0 O '� > N C L m 0) a) •. o U U f6 c0 f0 m a D o o +. CL O (B U p w O ? rn M0) 0) � oma) mCL c a) 0E'aU o�Er-0 �'a) monm'� a) 0 3 O N c O c0 o,r� L" -O CU E � m U C M o� U p" a) ,� U c C U o E� N +• U p. �M X a 0 C Y '= O Q) a) +� c@ C0 —0 C N o a)}? to L a) a p O U a),- p C U C O a) '� U 3 a) - rn a) Q `n o c E co a) L c U x c Ec U `c `° m ` p o C 3 C a o in a) cn Q >, m c°) L cZo E ) `° m v L O O .-. M U L _T Q E C .-% 01:" + C Q) 4) C +�. p- a a) C > C U T L N U— a) O� c 7 E Y C p- E U •� U N Q a) a) :�+ C U U N} O O O C •C .--. 'N .LO-. O w Y O L c E? p� C N a) a) O O E E- U" .Q a) a) U to c O` - U a) ) N O O 6 0 ° o vtn ii �m a) E 3 aa)) aa) °—_ 0Q.o .o o �o Vis— '~ aa) o �af°i � ai z O O ter} c Z, a) .— U Q m O --c avicn— c N (0 c O` U O T C~ O N m M aCCao U i > v .� Nc >030 a) Ernrn co)u) n a) 30 (17 Ucli Cw N CD C L a+ U U> U Q L a) L V a) 7 y C O .� (fin L N rU. U ` -FuU U U O a a) Q cn C a) �' U c U U N Q IC f0 f0 0 N c a) N T N a C E C O 4) a vi Q C o L c C +. O U D1 � Q L (0 E a) c !:; — a) a(n fn— Q Q V E a) cn .. U +. a) U U a) c O (n .O O) in C7 � W Q -t a) -O Q O O E a a) C C L C c9 7 Q) O O L) _Q a) 7 C .cn � 'O O O O O o o t C O L Hm(0""o) C a) C )cow. O O O `— L U.� �UU3EUwa)-5 L cr� O O 0 �a)UUcQd rE m mCL L� — r E P715 O N O I- N Lm N a_ a) c o ca '~ a c E O U M O cn Z v N N � C d � N '` r a) C >o C 0. m O v L g> Q Q Q 0 0 U U c �. O � U) w to c E 0 43m U U Q a) M m �� E a) 7 7 C En L r > 0 I L An C) T C U O d C C' O ` �U- U U U cn m c �O 0 0 CL g m a m E O O O O O O C N O U C C p O Y C O.0 m .� N L L L N O O 4)_ a) 2 c L O qp U O N L) L E a 0 E ` 'c Qa) LO L U >+J++r- _ O a) a 0 a to N > N to O U a)r p- O rn a) - :� w" c0 a) �7 " C: -a c a p E N a a) 3 a) CO O C N > L LO> '� c a) N U N Cp to O O a) ~= a) c c0 n U rn N a) E ° x pa m c0 to �coa E �� aa) (0 rnrnY 0 X c c 0 o Q � o a) c> O C L a) a) p m a) p Q• c cn 3 a O a) O � > �_ L to O O C C N N-- N U to a) L L X +' a) y0 C >, N fn a I— � :,_a U m Qcn Q ,~ N r-�• U 0 �. O 3> C ,� N N p N YO a) c a) � a) c0 ` '� '0 to .0 co E .O L a) c C C O N :"n L w= U O' >' N U to c O co tp O ` c C L c c a U T 4. CT to ) +- > Co a) Cnn U c c N to E a) = to c pcn a a) i m a) U O a) 0 •> .� = O) a (n —O 3 p C .0 > 'C a) c a) O °- O a co +� 3 C w V L +c. L a) 0 L a) O a) cco O N r a) C > "_ r Y a) U rn Mn O Z :_. ,> }L, o 3 a 3 0 a) 3 m to a to c CT Q U a) c o_ 0-0 Z 00 O— N C a L C C a N 'J N QCT U a) o f ;_ D cn 0 f0 — cn a) L U O O c O N" U !- L cn O (> O r ) Y c c ui O C U 'p C p T to S O C O L L N W- O N � C L C '•' N C N D> L a) U a a 3 Q. Cl) V Q U O O N U N C) d U a) a) .� >' Q a X' C -O .- N a O— a) O > a) C .� r-y C a) .� fl � Q :D CC` r- O N N (n m C: = U G 'a N CO N L (D Q- E (0 7 L L a) a) L) CV N C) tin a) C a oL L '�- c T (L I C O_d L L Cl) Q Cl) (/) N to a a) m N 7 a) Q a to a) a) N— W O c O C a) N a > a) 0X )(D 0w0a)QEXO Q Ly r' �tn3 E LLOca U a)� E fn c��� i) 3 a) Um m w u H m c H a)W � d O M r r a) (n r ;&& [1.1 Q N O 00 v - a) rn m CL P71 O N O O) r a) rn ca 0- d U c '~ CL c E O U U c tcv O fn Z N N M M M N cII a 'c d� m R >o c o •0 m 0.0 g> m m a a a N o 0 0 a) ate) o a c O•* o ao U 0 0 0 ;t a) a) a) a) �> !Z' C U O d � O C� O L- LL LL m m U U U m •c O` 0 0 m m CL 2 m a)w U U C "0 C C a) C 0 a) � C c`a U 0 cn 0) O 0 co L a) O 0 a)= O m W c a) DO y m J _l j r- a) cc a) U O C C ~ N` '' U" Cu v_ .0 '' LCcy 3 a) a) c 4. c o 2 U N ` c U a) : p � a) a) � c 0) U U— E L a) "0 E a) U a) a`) Q m 7 E d cu cu CO m '� cU0 p o p U c L 0) +(n N cu c >` O c O O C CU— a) y c0 ?i 4O 0 W -0 O N _� a) cn +. L Q. a) O c U '0 'C a3 N c0 a) a) d U p m _ O a) 'O a) a) O > T > (n p U` d o L N co to 3 cn a) C_ O C 0) C) V O p O. m,` " > U a) a) 0 L L +-' �' > L m "0 "0 a) p y+ a) C O O V cn U— O E }, L O (0 U c v) c0 U rL- U rn ? a) .� C m ` : .:c) N E � a) C: V) a) a) O o� a)� rn..-Cm cLm Q -o E � a) a a) . E f`_ a) -0 .cA 0 o ZC a3 0) a) E > LL U N 0 O` a) +. _ to O C a) 'E L M a) tUn U a) a 0 a) L Q 4) U "C O m Lr—N p 'p cn C m �' ¢ a) 7 t- m a) p" C O C N cm 0 •� > a) 0" C C +L.. tn—M Q m O V .L. O O N O C o to cu N E a) 0� a 3 Y v- p L D O 3 O Z o `—o c° o p� 2 m p p � Zm Q@ rn w a) � L o a) .� .S u) c t o m o ci --a C'C U) O Op• in ca N cam„_ rn p m � U mco) a)a30-0 L C y c O V a) o mw?c�aYmcoca D -m '_ -0 (n'o rn N c N 3 �-quio t j by cn () 7 iF 0 en C -t' L cOo a• a) 3 .V �', a) C 0) .-� m 3 N c c 0 C_ }, o L ca L '3 H cc ... p N c 7 U N Q c O c c0 W+ O N Q E � -0 c a) > N C ` a) L 0 +>, O Q C > N c — +•. 0' , 1 O i U 0) u) a) N O +. 0' a) a) a) v .. cn m c a) U °) mC)H = U U> c0 C � >o��rnUa) a) m c0 N w U)—C a) U "0 m N` ,O a) 0 3 cp V 0 a) �' 7 m a) c� N C +' r- I COa) 0) ccp 7 a) O 0 0 c0 c0 I U N 0 0 c U) U a) N "_ c .-. cn " 0 0 Q C L) +' rn 0 O 0> CL a7 c i 3 0 in U 0 c 0 0 a+ C 0 0 c i O Q 0 0 d Q' X L D �- +. a) rn E m 0° � a) = a) �. rn c O :_ 0 U to C L_ 0 0 +� c p N N a) N cn Co > L p a '-' +-' O p E 0 C O N L C C C o M. = fn c9 0 U C a) rn p` C .� m Y N U) w .L. U c9 m E O - E > L ca m ,+O .>- &U E U g c N co r N M O N O O) r a) rn ca 0- � � 0 O N C C O O Q N ` d � w I E >. M M 0- 0 O ca N U a') 3 O f° co N a c M CC rn c m c C O N N E D) o U U C .` •> C ` O Z C O r V) O y CL) .Q Q C 7 V E N (n O (0 M CD O N > Y V C O— N GD C N O 'C U O 0 L� U U N U E O 0 CLI >+ �E w r Y P718 O N 4-- 0 O N O O M CL cl- M E >. U a co M CC rn a U- o U U C m p cc 00 `o a) m -O U a) O U N w r O O a W U C7 -,'5(1) CL O N o -o o O U O C_ Y o = L L�: C in Ix U R F -- C C13 a N a) a M o a r 0 C Q n O E 'L O U d a U 7 w O C O) O a) o Q U m 0 `� ) c a) a +.• cE O O a d cn d Q m U 0 c a) E c 0 C> o .0 2 Q Q i N ` c U LL Z O j .c 01 U o n. rn C 0L C C W H m O N O L_ o o U N a` H O Cl r2 Q co U 0 W a) a) m .y m O O U a) a) a) C C CD c Q) C rn Q. -O w aa) Z 0 C o m " o v) a) v a) v c O> E. `o v o " o .2) U) CD oa) 6 O a) c a) CL `O Q) E t :Q v U Cp p U c >1 v 5 o Q. a U m a LL d 0 0 W O O U Q: 0 a 0 m a LL P718 O N 4-- 0 O N O O M CL 1 i& 10. City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRC2016-00452, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19762, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20032, Conditional Use Permit DRC2016-00449, Design Review DRC2016-00450, Uniform Sign Program DRC2016-00451 and Minor Exception DRC2016-00508. This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above -listed project. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components - This MMP contains the following elements: 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project. 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management - The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project planner, assigned by the Planning Director, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures - The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. 2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address: City of Rancho Cucamonga - Lead Agency Planning Department P72O Mitigation Monitoring Program Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRC2016-00452, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19762, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20032, Conditional Use Permit DRC2016-00449, Design Review DRC2016-00450, Uniform Sign Program DRC2016-00451 and Minor Exception DRC2016-00508. Project Page 3 3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed, as determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner. 4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development. 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. 7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The Department shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time. 9. In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or Planning Director prior to the issuance of building permits. P721 City of Rancho Cucamonga rill MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Mitigated Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRC2016-00452, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19762, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20032, Conditional Use Permit DRC2016-00449, Design Review DRC2016-00450, Uniform Sign Program DRC2016-00451 and Minor Exception DRC2016-00508. Public Review Period Closes: June 14, 2017 Project Name: Day Creek Square Project Applicant: DR Horton Contact: Dan Boyd Vice President/Entitlements 2280 Wardlow Circle, Suite 100 Corona, CA 92880 Contact: Dan Boyd, 951-739-5444 Project Location (also see attached map): The project is located at the southwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road. — APN: 1090-331-05. Project Description: The applicant, DR Horton, proposes developing the 28.4 acre site located at the southwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road with a mixed use project consisting of 380 single-family and townhome residential units, a boutique hotel and two restaurant buildings totaling 12,000 square feet. The overall project area is made up of 1 parcel totaling 28.4 acres of land. Of the 28.4 acres, 24.9 will be allocated to the residential portion of the site, and 3.5 acres will be allocated to the two restaurant pads and hotel site. The project is for the site plan and architectural review of the 380 residential units (329 townhomes and 51 single-family dwelling units), two restaurant pads (two 6k restaurants), and a 71 room hotel. The project also includes the subdivision of the 28.4 acre site into 4 parcels and a residential condominium subdivision for the 380 residential units. The project includes a Victoria Community Plan Amendment to change the zoning from Regionally Related Office/Commercial (RROC) to Mixed Use in order to be consistent with the Mixed Use Land Use designation in the General Plan. A Conditional Use Permit (CUP) application is also included for the requested bar/alcohol sales (Type 70 — On Sale General Restrictive License) at the hotel. The Assessor's Parcel Number is: 1090-331-05. FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Mitigated Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but: (1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and; P722 (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project, as revised, may have a significant effect on the environment. If adopted, the Mitigated Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. The factual and analytical basis for this finding is included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration during the review period. Date of Determination Adopted By P723 Granger, Donald From: Granger, Donald Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 3:22 PM To: 'Charlie Buquet' Subject: RE: Day Creek Square Hello Charlie. Thank you for the comments. We are currently reviewing your comments and ideas. Best, Donald Granger Senior Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 909-477-2750 ext. 4314 donald.granger@cityofrc.us From: Charlie Buquetso Sent: Monday, April 10, 2017 5: NP��� To: Granger, Donald <Donald.Granger@cityofrc.us>; Dan Boyd <dboyd@drhorton.com> Subject: Re: Day Creek Square Mr Boyd, Donald and you have done a great job on the architectural, but some things should be updated to finish off that wonderful effort. Some of these comments below are the same comments the City had for the Strathmore project. I am planning on attending the DRC meeting to help. Please note that I am a resident, long time business owner and shop in the area. I was proud of our projects you built, and what them to be successful for you and the City. The shopping center across the street was a design award winner, that is VERY successful and concerned the lack of parking on your project is going to impact the center across the street by guests parking there and walking across the street (not far fetched, they are doing it at your other two properties which is the reason we had to gate the Strathmore project. As you may know, I have worked on over 180 ground up projects, numerous shopping centers, mixed use, hotels a number of them in Rancho Cucamonga and just want this to be a successful project for you and the city. General comments are as follows; �c Um 1 0 EXHIBIT 0 P724 Amenities, the DR Horton project we did with 182 units had only one pool. As the past HOA president and home owner I can say this is about all the project can handle. Having twice as many units will be extremely problematic with usability. One needs to look at DR Horton project on Church & Daycreek, this is double the size, need double the amenities. You need a tot lot. You should have a community room/area for property management/maintenance (to have storage space, office, etc) and uses for residents. Strathmore residents were having to store things for the HOA since there was no room. Per the code you need a minimum 3 main amenities (pools, but need another one at a minimum. I would suggest another pool and some spa's with dipping pools for more adult or chill space than just one pool. Suggestion is to make some of the "concrete patios" in front of the private concrete patios actual amenities. Furthermore, the project on Church & Daycreek DR Horton did not actually install those amenities, and the HOA was required to pay after the fact. I would recommend making it clear that the builder must actually install the amenities (BBQ, Spa, Tot Lot, benches, lighting, etc. Consideration should be made to make the mini park more square, as it is funky. The community park should be a separate amenity that is gated/fenced to protect he residents. Consideration should be made for emergency access vehicles to access this area rather than going through the residential project. My suggestion would be to flip the condo units to the North of this park so the drive aisle access is along the north side of the park, providing a better visual corridor for safety and avoiding attractive nuisance considerations and make it easier for residents and law enforcement to see the park and access the park for emergency access only. There is nothing in the park, you need things in a park. Tot lot, volleyball court, shade structures, picnic tables, park benches, etc. See below. Those exercise stations will not get much use and frankly are useless as it's configured. If there is a concern, then perhaps it should be separated into two projects as we did for the projects south of Strathmore. Is the project applying for a variance from the code required amenities? 4. Recreation Area/Facility. Where required, in the M, MH, and H residential districts, the developer shall provide recreational amenities in conjunction with common open space as follows: 1. Development consisting of thirty (30) units or less shall provide three (3) of the following recreational amenities: 1. Large open lawn area; one of the dimensions shall be a minimum of fifty feet (50'). 2. Enclosed tot lot with multiple play equipment. 3. Spa or pool. 4. Barbecue facility equipped with grill, picnic benches, etc. P725 Development consisting of thirty-one (3 1) units to one hundred (100) units shall provide another set of recreational amenities as described in Subsection 17.122.040.M.1 above, or equivalent, as approved by the Planning Commission. Development consisting of one hundred and one (10 1) units to two hundred (200) units shall provide five (5) of the following recreational amenities, or equivalent, as approved by the Planning Commission: 1. Large open lawn; one of the dimensions shall be a minimum of one hundred feet (100'). 2. Multiple enclosed tot lots with multiple play equipment. The tot lots shall be conveniently located throughout the site. The number of tot lots and their location shall be subject to Planning Commission review and approval. 3. Pool and spa. 4. Community multipurpose room equipped with kitchen, defined areas for games, exercises, etc. 5. Barbecue facilities equipped with multiple grills, picnic benches, etc. The barbecue facilities shall be conveniently located throughout the site. The number of barbecue facilities and their locations shall be subject to Planning Commission review and approval. 6. Court facilities (e.g., tennis, volleyball, basketball). 4. Dispersal of recreational facilities throughout the site shall be required for development with multiple recreational facilities. (It goes on for two pages). The General plan requires for access to the Edison easement which was originally conceived to be pedestrian community trials, just show the gates with the locks. (same as other projects). Parking First, the development code requires shared parking agreement, and with the uses a shared parking study should be done. These uses are not like uses (office/retail/restaurant) they are tied to transient and permanent residential uses, which create more problems than the typical commercial shared parking scenario. The parking allocation shows dens/alternate floor plans that can create conversion of units to bedrooms increasing parking demand. Furthermore, the tandem parking due to the configuration is very likely to turn into storage units not giving adequate parking. Note that the DR Horton project on Baseline Victoria Loop is having this problem, people parking on the street, residential neighborhoods, in the commercial center Etc. Strathmore we had tow truck companies, ambulances, truck drivers, contractors, landscape contractors, customers going shopping etc parking in the project and walking across the street. Further, residents parked across the street in the residential neighborhood and retail and walked into the project due to not enough parking. Shared Parking Agreement. A written agreement between the landowners and in some cases the City that runs with the land shall be filed, in a form satisfactory to the City Attorney, and include: P726 1. A guarantee that there will be no substantial alteration in the uses that will create a greater demand for parkin without application for approval of an amended Conditional Use Permit. 2. A reciprocal grant of nonexclusive license among the business operator(s) and the landowners) for access to and use of the shared parking facilities. 3. Evidence that the agreement has been recorded in the County Recorder's office. Solutions -increase guest parking, or redesign drive aisle for more guest parking or parking in front of garage units. Allow for parking permits to be used for neighboring residential to avoid people parking there and walking to the pocket park, or DR Horton Condo project. Consider variances and adjustment to the wasted open space between the hotel and residential adjust the site plan and reduce setbacks to allow for more on street parallel parking. The code requires that the lots record a reciprocal parking easement when there is shared parking and access. It should be clear that this will be done, I have not seen a report showing that this will be done, as there is an assumptions there is two lots (commercial/Residential). Based on my review of traffic trip thresholds, the residential uses, hotel, and restaurant uses have peak parking that will cause commercial shoppers to park on the residential parking and residents and guests to park on the commercial. DR Horton should show how to address this in a more compatible integral way, rather than residential first, commercial second. I know we can do this swift and make the project more attractive to prospective buyers. Site Plan - The project needs to show how it can be gated and still maintain a mixed use synergistic feel. In regards to the density concerns, they should consider the attached unit/duplex/triplex concept along the south, then blend the other uses as they go north. Here are some problematic issues to be considered. The units west of the baseline signalized intersection are have conflicting turn movements for egress traffic and are problematic and a safety concern. I have spoken to some of my retail developer clients. They have interest in the corner property but the site plan is problematic that the buildings are too narrow and site plan is not efficient which appears to be an afterthought rather than integral site plan configuration. It appears to be a "throw away" sliver. Consideration should be made for a more flexible building allocation to prevent this turning into fast food pads and other undesirable mixed use. A traffic signal cuing study should be done to confirm the stacking is sufficient for a project of this size, taking into consideration the uses proposed. Hotel- The access shown is extremely problematic for the turn movements for the intersection, and do not meet ITE safety standards. The layout is basically trying to "separate" the hotel from the residential via a landscape planter. Consideration should be made to flip the parking and move the hotel closer to the signal, allowing for a more uniform design. There should be consideration for a pool/spa. If another pool/spa clubhouse is added in the empty area on the lots, then you should consider a shared pool/spa for this area potentially (less desirable) If the hotel were on Daycreek, Daycreek is closer and more desirable address than baseline and more desirable for Hotel tenants. I am working with a high end hotel who licensed one of top luxury car brand name and they have an interest in being closer or near the mall, and consideration to move this to Daycreek and flip the uses would be more suitable, Although I would like a hotel for the P727 City, residential uses and hotels tend to not mix well due to parking issues. Introducing office would be much better. I could provide parking shared summary data to demonstrate. Would you consider an age restricted assisted living project? Lower parking, less traffic. Restaurants- Restaurants do not like competitors sharing parking, so moving the hotel to the middle, would reduce this concern. When we spoke to Mortans Steakhouse, Lazy Dog Cafes etc on the project Donald and I worked on Foothill. They want a sea of parking for them to be successful and find that people will "wait" 45-90 minutes to eat. That means that they are in parking spaces that are not otherwise utilized, hence other uses, Office, retail, etc are needed/valued. As someone who has been representing owner users there is not enough office in this market and the comps are very strong. Consideration of a building use that is complimentary or integrated (such as day care, Gym's, offices, etc) that can truly take advantage of shared parking and residents which are like an amenity should be considered. Uses - Lewis had a great concept of some office units within the project that could be used short term or month to month or long term for true live work type opportunities (Executive offices). You actually can get $4 psf which is double the market for retail/office currently. All executive offices are fully occupied in the City. You can have your management staff meet there, hoa meet there, etc. Corporate rentals are very valuable. City should also consider AIRBNB in the conditions. If people AIRBNB, they should have to register and pay the hotel tax, this would be a value add for the city and residents. This property has a lot of potential for live work (separated) for business professionals like myself. In fact, I would put my money where my mouth is and buy or lease if you could provide a building/units. If you had such a concept, and have three clients in need of such a use. Setting the pie in the sky aside (knowing this is your property) but I think it should at least help for consideration for mix of uses that are beneficial. I have a couple of retail developers/clients who would be interested in meeting with you to talk about some tweaks that could be helpful and ones they would feel confident building with the right area to do so. Regards Charlie Sent from my Phone On Apr 10, 2017, at 8:15 AM, Granger, Donald <Donald.Grange r@cityofrc.us> wrote: Hello all. You are receiving this email because you have indicated interest in receiving updates via email regarding upcoming meetings for the proposed Day Creek Square project by DR Horton. P728 Please be advised that DR Horton/Day Creek Square Project has been scheduled for review by the Design Review Community on Tuesday, April 18, at 7:00 p.m. at City Hall in the Rains Conference Room. City Hall is located at 10500 Civic Center Drive. Please be advised of the following key points regarding the Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee is advisory Committee to the Planning Commission. No formal decision will be made on the project at the meeting. The primary focus of the Design Review Committee is to review the project's architecture, landscape and site planning. The Design Review Committee is not a public hearing; however, the public is invited to attend and provide comments regarding the design and architecture of the project. Agendas and reports for the April 18, 2017 Design Review Committee Meeting can found online at: https://www.citvofrc.us/citvhall/meetings/dre/default.asp At this time, the project has not been scheduled for a public hearing for review by the Planning Commission. A separate notice will be sent when the project is scheduled for review by the Planning Commission. Best regards, Donald Granger Senior Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 909-477-2750 ext. 4314 donald.eranger@cityofrc.us WALTON April 11, 2017 Planning Department c/o Donald Granger, Senior Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Dr. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91786 Dear Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department: Thank you for conducting the community meeting on March 27, 2017, regarding the Day Creek Square project proposed by the developer DR Horton. I am glad that I was able to attend. I am an Upland resident who has been frequenting Rancho Cucamonga for over ten years. I have been an adjunct biology professor at Chaffey College, performed in several Lewis Family Playhouse productions, and volunteered at the North Etiwanda Preserve (NEP). I regularly visit many of your city's businesses, and especially enjoy riding my bike on the Pacific Electric (PE) Trail and hiking in the NEP. Most importantly, I am a wildlife biologist who is concerned with the quality of life in our foothill communities. According to its 2010 General Plan, Rancho Cucamonga (City) "intends to conserve important remnants of the City's agricultural heritage, as well as preserve significant visual resources, sensitive habitats, lands important for water resources, and recreational spaces (Chapter 6, Page RC -7; https:Hwww.cityofrc.us/cityhalI/pIanning/genpIan.asp) ." I am disappointed, however, that the plans for Day Creek Square (DCS) show minimal regard for the above resource conservation goals and will just replace more of our open southern California landscape with urban sprawl. Therefore, I ask that you use your authority and creativity to ensure that DR Horton minimizes the DCS's impact on the environment by carrying out the following actions. Preserve and/or Restore Native Veeetation Please do not allow the common southern California practice of decimating a project site of all of its original native vegetation and then replacing it with the same non-native plant species that every other shopping center or housing development uses. Instead, I ask you to embrace our unique native California landscape, by requiring DR Horton to create a comprehensive mitigation plan to address the negative impacts to native Riversidian alluvial fan sage scrub (RAFSS) habitat found within the Day Creek Square (DCS) site. This RAFSS community includes scalebroom (Lepidospartum squamatum), California sagebrush (Artemesia P730 californica), Deerweed (Acmispon glaber), chamise (Adenostoma fasciculatznn), California b um fascr slat ; arida varlet of er n tive.0lanf species. ,4VjZi00A Rancho Cucamonga should require DR Horton to provide provisions for the preservation and/or restoration of native RAFSS habitat, or habitat with similar species, in open spaces within the Day Creek Square (DCS) site and throughout the city for several reasons. RAFSS habitat is considered by our state to be a sensitive and declining habitat (see enclosed "Alluvial Scrub Vegetation" document), and most of it will have to be removed to complete the DCS as described. Such a requirement would also be consistent with the Rancho Cucamonga 2010 General Plan Policies RC -1.1, RC -8.1, RC -8.3, RC -8.4, and RC -8.7. Such preservation/restoration areas should be comparable in area to the amount of acreage of RAFSS lost to this DCS project. Restoration locations outside of the DCS site could include open spaces along bike paths or drainages like Day Creek Drainage. Possible permanent preservation locations could include the area on the west side of Central Park on Millikan Ave. and areas bordering the North Etiwanda Preserve (NEP). Since large areas bordering the NEP are already part of Rancho Cucamonga's proposed conservation areas to protect alluvial fan sage scrub (Rancho Cucamonga 2010 General Plan, Chapter 6, RC -4), the City should require revenue from projects like the DCS to help acquire these conservation areas. Local resources like the Inland Empire Resource Conservation District (IERCD, https:HN""v.iercd.org/) and San Bernardino County Special Districts Department should be able to help guide you with the mitigation process. I am certain that the DCS landscape architects can incorporate the native RAFSS habitat into the DCS's landscape design. For your reference, I have enclosed the list of native plants (see enclosed "Native Plant Species" list) that were found on the DCMP site since many of these plants can also be found on the DCS site. This list also indicates which plants can be purchased at a local nursery. Although preserving native habitat would be preferable to clearing and then replanting native vegetation, many of these native plants can be purchased locally. The developer can utilize biological consultants and other local entities, such as the Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden (http://www.rsabg.org) and IERCD, to help determine how to best preserve and maintain some of this native habitat, and minimize any fire concerns. DR Horton could even work with the National Wildlife Federation on how to become a certified Wildlife Habitat Community (http://wNN,,�v.nwf.org/Garden-For-Wildlife/Create/Communities.aspx). Riversidian alluvial fan sage scrub was also documented just north of the Day Creek Square (DCS) site by LSA Associates Inc. at the Day Creek Market Place (DCMP) and Residential Project site in February 2015 (see enclosed "Biological Assessment" document). Yet, in 2016, Rancho Cucamonga sadly allowed this RAFSS habitat to be cleared away by Lewis Retail Centers with no thorough and detailed mitigation plan for the loss of this habitat in the DCMP site, even though such action was strongly recommended by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDWF) in October 2015 (see enclosed "CDFW Letter"). Although I was 2 P731 glad to see that Lewis Retail Centers decided to include a native plant garden in its final DCMP plans in response to public concern, the size of this native garden will not be close to representing the acreage of native vegetation that was removed. I implore you to not repeat this lack of concern for preserving RAFSS in the DCS project plans. Within a short visit to the DCS site this spring, I was able to spot animals not normally found within highly urbanized areas such as desert cottontails (Sylvia audirbonii), side - blotched lizards (Uta stransburiana), and a variety of beautiful native birds and butterflies bustling around the flowering native vegetation. Our communities clamor to save rainforests and other habitats in foreign lands, but we rarely think twice about destroying our own native landscapes that provide habitat for hundreds of native California animal species. Please use this opportunity to think twice and act in favor of preserving/restoring RAFSS. Plant More Native Large -Canopy Trees I am happy to see that DR Horton is planning on planting native large -canopy trees in Day Creek Square (DCS), like coast live oaks (Quercus agrifolia) and California sycamores (Plantancrs racemose), that provide more shade and wildlife habitat than much smaller non-native ornamental trees like crape myrtles (Lagerstroemia hybrid). However, preliminary Day Creek Square plans show that many more small -canopy non-native trees will be planted than native large -canopy trees, therefore I ask that DR Horton plant more native large -shade trees. The DCS tree palette could also include other native oaks like the canyon live oak (Quercus chrysolepis). Native oaks would complement the large canyon live oak tree that will be preserved just west of Fire Station 173. To get a feeling of how beautiful and welcoming native oaks can be, just drive down one of the craftsman neighborhoods around Pasadena and Claremont where one cannot help but feel their majesty - a sense of awe and peace I have yet to experience in the presence of a crape myrtle. Please also review the following enclosed article discussing the many benefits of having large city trees: "No Safe Arbor" (http://articies.latinies.com/print/2004/mar/08/entertainment/et- trees8). Minimize Lieht Pollution I am pleased to see that the City of Rancho Cucamonga is trying to minimize light pollution (Rancho Cucamonga Development Code, Article IV, Section 17.58.050) and, thus, preserve the visual resource of a dark night sky. In addition to requiring shielded lighting, please require DR Horton to use "warm -white" or filtered LED light bulbs that minimize the glare, or blue- light emission, of such bulbs whenever possible. Please note that LED lights can be so bright that shielding them alone does not minimize the amount of glare they can emit. P732 For more information on minimizing light pollution, please refer to the enclosed "Lighting Plan Guidelines" provided by the Dark Sky Society (http://www.darkskysociety.org/). Please also restrict blinding LED signs in this DCS community. The relatively new LED sign at the Lewis Family Playhouse has discouraged me and my husband from relaxing in what used to be an inviting plaza area. My husband and I have no desire to see more of such signs in Rancho Cucamonga. Increase Open Space and Connectivity The project planners expressed the desire for a pedestrian friendly community where community space is the focus instead of large back yards. I agree with this concept, but DR Horton must provide much more open space and connectivity within the Day Creek Square (DCS) community to achieve this goal. Several attendees at the March community meeting expressed lack of connectivity and park space throughout the DCS plans and I strongly agree. Please significantly widen the "linear park" and extend it to the western edge of the property. I do not believe that the developer should be allowed to call this area a "park" when it is narrower than many portions of the Pacific Electric Trail. However, with some changes, this area could be made to feel more like a park and gathering space. The front doors to houses along this southern park corridor could face the park area and encourage home owners to feel connected to and watch over this area, similar to how Euclid Avenue residents in Upland face their walking trail. The privacy walls that are planned would only encourage residents to ignore this park area. With more neighborhood eyes watching this area, the desire for more obtrusive lighting and security cameras should be alleviated. Porches could also be added to these houses to encourage parents to sit and watch their kids play in the park area from the comfort of their homes. By extending the park to the western property edge, this park area could be connected to the planned bike path along Day Creek Drainage (Rancho Cucamonga 2010 General Plan, Chapter 3, Figure CM -7). Additionally, if a rod iron fence, instead of a block wall, delineated the DCS property on this western end, then smaller animals (like desert cottontails and side - blotched lizards) should be able to migrate from native habitat along Day Creek drainage and utilize native habitat in the park area. Portions of this park could easily include native California sage scrub habitat along with drought resistant native grass where turf is desired. Such a native turf grass would include the native bentgrass (Agrotis pallens; https://joansboIton.wordpress.com/2012/03/13/a-new-lawn- alternative-california-native-sod/). As one other resident mentioned, the special event plaza could be connected with a promenade to the southern park area. More native canopy trees and scrub habitat could also 4 P733 be included along these more spacious walkways. This promenade could even become a park itself with spectacular views of the mountains as people make their way up the hill. Such a park would also be in sync with Policy RC -1.2 of the Rancho Cucamonga 2010 General Plan. Add a Large Organic Garden Although I do prefer protecting native habitat over agricultural lands, I do believe in the importance of protecting land for agriculture since huge portions of our agricultural lands are being lost at an alarming rate due to urbanization (see enclosed "Agricultural Loss and Conservation" article). Therefore, I believe that a large organic garden should be included in this Day Creek Square (DCS) community. Tile garden can be run by the community itself or the restaurants themselves or both. This garden would help add to the amount of open space left for the community to enjoy and teach the importance of our agricultural heritage in our region. The garden could be incorporated into the restaurant area or exist as its own separate entity, but preferably within view of the restaurant area or other common walking paths. Local consultants, like Fang to Fork Garden Design (http://www.farnitoforkaardendesign.com/) and Robbie Bos (littp://wp.sbcotinty.gov/cao/countywire/?p=2451) should be able to help design such a garden. Any restaurants occupying DCS should be one that embraces locally sourced and organic food so that this organic garden will have a consistent customer or manager. Many California upscale restaurants, like the Madrona Manor (https:HetilicaIfoods.com/farm-to-fork/), are now embracing this "farm to fork" idea. With an organic garden on site, DCS should be able to attract one of these kinds of restaurants. With input and collaboration between all concerned parties, the plans for Day Creek Square should become more complementary to the goals of the Rancho Cucamonga 2010 General Plan and the needs of its local foothill residents. Please do not rush this important process. Thank you for your time and consideration, and let me know if you have any questions or concerns. Sincerely, Natasha Walton, M.S. Enclosures (7) P734 Native Plant Species Observed by LSA Associates Inc. at the Day Creek Market Place and Residential Project Site on February 26, 2015 Information & Nursery Availability Provided by Natasha Walton This plant list includes informational and plant availability web links for native California plant species observed on February 26, 2015, at the Day Creek Market Place (DCMP) site. Due to the close proximity of the DCMP site to the Day Creek Square (DCS) site, many of these plants can be found on, or may have historically occupied, the DCS site. However, please also refer to any plant species list generated by any biological surveys compiled for the DCS site. Nursery Abbreviations: The following nursery abbreviations are listed after every plant that has been or is currently available at a particular native California plant nursery. Each nursery should be contacted to determine current availability. TOL - Tree of Life Nursery(http://californianativeplatits.com/plants/plantcatalocdownload/) RSABG - Rancho Santa Ana Botanical Garden Nursery (http://Nvww.rsabg.org/plant- availability) TP - Theodore Payne Foundation (http://theodorepayne.org/nursery/inventoryi) LP - Las Pilitas Nursery(littp://www.IaspiIitas.com/sliop/plant-products) Cal Flora Website: Included for the following plants are links to the Cal Flora website for detailed descriptions of each plant species. Some of the Cal Flora links below include updated plant name information. The Cal Flora links also provide information on the availability of plants at nurseries, but this information may not be current. Plant Species: Moschatal Family Mexican Elderberry/Blue Elderberry (Sambucus mexicana) : TOL, RSABG, TP, & LP littp://www.laspilitas.com/nature-of-califomia/plants/620--sambucus-mexicana http://www.calflora.org/cgi-bin/species_query.cgi?where-calrecnuni=7320 P735 Sumac Family Lemonadeberry (Rhus integrifolia): TOL, RSABG, TP, & LP http://www.lasp i 1 itas.com/nature-of-cal i fornia/plants/5 70--rhus-i ntegrifo 1 is http://www.calflora.org/cgi-bin/species_query.cgi?where-calrecnum=7090 Skunkbush (Rhus b•ilobata): TOL, RSABG, & LP http://www.laspi litas.coin/nature-of-california/plants/573--rhos-trilobata http://ww,,v.caI flora.org/cgi-bin/spec ies_query.cgi?where-taxon=Rhus+trilobata Sunflower Family California Sagebrush (Artemesia californica): TP & LP http://wxvw.]aspiIitas.com/nature-of-california/plants/93--artemisia-californica http://www.calflora.org/cgi-bin/species_query.cgi?where-calrecnum=705 Mule fat (Baccharis salicifolia): TP & LP http://www.laspilitas.com/nature-of-califoriiia/plants/I 18--baccharis-vim inea http://NvwNv.tlieodorepayne.org/mediawiki/index.php'?title=Baccliaris_salicifolia http://w,,"v.calflora.org/cgi-bin/species_query.cgi?where-calrecnum=1035 Pinebush (Ericameria pinifolia): http://xvww.calflora.org/cgi-bin/species_query.cgi?where-taxon=Ericaineria+pinifol is Telegraph Weed (Heterotheca grandiflora): http://www.laspiIitas.com/nature-of-california/plants/1 147--heterotheca-grandiflora http://www.calflora.org/cgi-bin/species_query.cgi?where-calrecnum=4142 Scalebroom (Lepidospartum squamatum): http://www.laspilitas.com/nature-of-california/plants/382--lepidospartum-squaniatum http://,,Nv.calflora.org/cgi-bin/species_query.cgi?where-taxon=Lepidospartum+squamatum Borage Family Common Fiddleneck (Amsinckia menziesi►): http://www.calflora.org/cgi-bin/species_query.cgi?where-calrecnum=326 Cryptantha (Cryptantha species): http://www.calflora.org/cgi-bin/specieslist.cgi?where-genus=Cryptantha Yerba Santa (Eriodictyon californicum): LP http://v<,-vvxv.laspilitas.com/nature-of-california/plants/273--eriodict),on-californicum http://xvww.calflora.org/cgi-bin/species_query.egi?where-calrecnum=3182 P736 Common Eucrypta (Euchrypta chrysanthemfolia): http://www.calflora.org/cgi-bin/species_query.cgi?where-calrecnum=3543 Sagebrush Combseed (Pectocarya linearis): http://Nvww.cal flora.org/cgi-bin/species_query.cgi?where-calrecnum=9186 Cactus Family Valley Cholla (Cylindropuntia californica var. parkert): http://www.calflora org/cp-i-bin/species quern cgi?where- taxon=C liy ndropuntia+californica+var+parkeri Beavertail (Opuntia species): (Opuntia basilaris available at TP) http://www.laspilitas.com/nature-of-california/plants/1005--opuntia-basilaris http://AA,Nvw.calflora.org/cgi-bin/species_query.cgi?where-calrecnum=5926 Gourd Family Cucamonga Manroot/Wild Cucumber (Marah macrocarpus): littp:Hwww.laspilitas.com/nature-of-cali fomia/plants/ 1 155--marah-fabaceus-fabaceus http://www.calflora.ora/cgi-bin/species Family California Croton (Croton californicits): TP http://w-vvNv.laspi l itas.coin/nature-of-cal ifornia/plants/ 1145--croton-cal ifornicus http://www.tlieodorepayne.org/mediawiki/index.plip?title=Croton_ californica http://www.calflora.org/cgi-bin/species_query.cgi?where-calrecnum=2434 Dove weed (Croton setigerus): http://www.caltlora.org/cgi-bin/species_query.cgi?where-calrecnum=9518 Pea Family Deerweed (Acmispon glaber) : TP & LP http://www.laspiIitas.com/nature-of-california/plants/403--lotus-scoparius http://www.calflora.org/cgi-bin/species_query.cgi?where-taxon=Acmispon+glaber Dwarf White Milk Vetch (Astragalus didymocarpus): http://www.cal flora.org/cgi-bin/species_query.cgi?where-calrecnum=826 Pomona Locoweed (Astralagus pomonensis): TP http://www.theodorepayne.org/mediawiki/index.plip?title=Astragalus_pomonensis http://Nvww.calflora.org/cgi-bin/species_query.cgi?where-calrecnum=913 P737 Beeches and Oak Family Canyon Live Oak (Quercus chrysolepis): TOL, TP, & LP (Other oak [Quercus] species can be purchased from TOL, RSABG, TP, & LP) http://wwtv.iaspil itas.com/nature-of-california/plants/554--quercus-chrysolepis http://www.calflora.org/cgi-bin/species_quet-y.cgi?where-calrecnum=6987 Mint Family White Sage (Sah4a apiana): TOL, RSABG, TP, & LP http://wN,vxv.laspilitas.com/nature-of-californialplants/604--salvia-apiana http://www.catifornianativepIants.com/index.php/catalog/item/salvia-apiana http://www.calflora.org/cgi-bin/species_query.cgi?where-calrecnum=7298 Buckwheat Family California Buckwheat (Eriogonuni fasciculatum): TOL, RSABG, TP, & LP http://www.laspilitas.com/nature-of-california/plants/283--eriogonum-fasciculatum-foliolosum http://www.calflora.org/cgi-bin/species_query.cgi?wliere-calrecnum=3243 Wild Rhubarb (Rumex hymenosepalus): http://www.calflora.orI= cgi-bin/species_query.cgi?where-calrecnum=7217 Evening Primrose Family Suncup (Camissoniopsis species): (Species in this genus available at TP) http://www.laspilitas.com/nature-of-california/plants/1356--oenothera-primiveris (This may not be the species that was found but it probably has a lot of characteristics similar to it) http://w�vw.calflora.org/cgi-bin/specieslist.cgi?where-genus=Camissonia Buckthorn Family Redberry (Rhamnus crocea): TOL, RSABG, TP, & LP http://www.Iaspilitas.coin/nature-of-california/plants/568--rhamnus-crocea http:/hvw,,v.calflora.org/cgi-bin/species_query.cgi?where-taxon=Rhamnus+crocea Rose Family Chamise (Adenostoma fasciccilatum): TOL, RSABG, TP, & LP http://wkv-vv.laspilitas.com/nature-of-califomia/plants/I 6--adenostoma-fasciculatum http:/hvwvv.theodorepavne.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=Adenostoma_ fasciculatum http://Nv-vxv.calflora.org/cgi-bin/species_qucry.cgi?where-taxon=Adenostoma+fasciculatum 4 P738 Mountain Mahogany (Cercocarpus betuloides): TOL, RSABG, TP, & LP littp:HNv-vvw.laspilitas.com/natLire-of-califoniia/plaiits/I 93--cercocarpus-betuloides http://www.californianativeplants.com/index.php/plants/plant-profiles/doe_detaits/41- cercocarpus-betuloides-mountain-mahogany http://w�vNv.calflora.org/cgi-bin/species_query.cgi?where-calrecnum=1878 Holly Leaved Cherry (Pruners ilicifolia): TOL, RSABG, TP, & LP http://wNvw.IaspiIitas.com/nature-of-california/plants/541--prunes-ilicifolia http://NN,NvNv.califomianativeplants.com/index.php/catalog/item/prunus-ilicifolia-ssp-ilicifolia http://www.calflora.org/cgi-bin/species_query.cgi?where-taxon=Prunus+ilicifolia Agave Family Chaparral Yucca (Hespereroyucca whippler): RSABG & TP http://www.IaspiIitas.com/nature-of-california/pIants/879--yucca-wliipplei-caespitosa http://www.calflora.org/cgi-bin/species_query.cgi?where-calrecnum=9995 Note: Although poison oak (Toxicodendron diversilobum) is a native species found on the DCMP site, I have excluded this plant from the list since I expect that no one would want to preserve it within this urban landscape. P739 State of California - Natural Resources Agency EDMUND G BROWN Jr Governor • DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE CHARLTON H. BONHAM, Director Inland Deserts Region 3602 Inland Empire Blvd., Suite C-220 Ontario, CA 91764 (909) 484-0459 www.wildlife.ca.gov October 27, 2015 Mr. Tabe Van Der Zwaag Associate Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Subject: Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration Day Creek Marketplace and Residential Project State Clearinghouse No. 2015101018 Dear Mr. Van Der Zwaag: The California Department of Fish and Wildlife (Department) appreciates the opportunity to comment on the Initial Study (IS) and proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for the Day Creek Marketplace and Residential Project (Project) [State Clearinghouse No. 2015101018]. The Department is responding to the IS and proposed MND as a Trustee Agency for fish and wildlife resources (California Fish and Game Code Sections 711.7 and 1802, and the California Environmental Quality Act [CEQA] Guidelines Section 15386), and as a Responsible Agency regarding any discretionary actions (CEQA Guidelines Section 15381), such as the issuance of a Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement (California Fish and Game Code Sections 1600 et seq.) and/or a California Endangered Species Act (CESA) Permit for Incidental Take of Endangered, Threatened, and/or Candidate species (California Fish and Game Code Sections 2080 and 2080.1). Proiect Description The proposed project site is located north of Base Line Road, west of Day Creek Boulevard, south of the Pacific Electric Bike Trail, and east of the Day Creek Flood Control Channel, within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California. The project proposes to amend the General Plan and Victoria Community Plan to change the land use designation to allow the development of a commercial center of 10.94 acres of land and 4 acres designated for the future development of multi -family housing. Biological Resources and Impacts The Department has jurisdiction over the conservation, protection, and management of fish, wildlife, native plants, and the habitat necessary for biologically sustainable Conserving Ca(fornids Wifdffe Since 1870 P74O Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration Day Creek Marketplace and Residential Project SCH No. 2015101018 Page 2 of 5 populations of those species (i.e., biological resources); and administers the Natural Community Conservation Planning Program (NCCP Program). The Department offers the comments and recommendations presented below to assist the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City; the CEQA lead agency) in adequately identifying and/or mitigating the project's significant, or potentially significant, impacts on biological resources. Following review of the Biological Resources section of the IS, the Department identified a number of questions, comments and concerns, and requests that each of these be addressed prior to adoption of the proposed MND. The Department's questions, comments, and concerns include: 1. San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat. The project site contains suitable habitat for, and is located within one mile of federally designated critical habitat for San Bernardino kangaroo rat (SBKR), a federally endangered species and California Species of Special Concern. Although the roads, flood control channel, and bike trail surrounding the site present barriers to SBKR movement, the Department does not concur that SBKR can be presumed absent based on the presence of barriers alone. Nor can SBKR be precluded by the level of disturbance on the site: SBKR have been detected in disturbed habitat, including orange groves, former vineyards, and areas containing non-native grasses and other'ruderal' vegetation (Braden and McKernan 2000). Absent a focused trapping survey, the Department recommends that the City consult with the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) prior to initiation of project activities. 2. Sensitive Species. The Biological Resources Assessment (BRA) identifies the following special -status species as potentially occurring on-site: coast horned lizard (Phrynosoma blainvillii), northwestern San Diego pocket mouse (Chaetodipus fallax fallax), San Diego desert woodrat (Neotoma lepida intermedia), Parry's spineflower (Chorizanthe parryi var. parryi), and mesa horkelia (Horkelia cuneata var. puberula). As the BRA notes, "these species have a limited population distribution in southern California, and development is reducing their ranges and numbers further." The BRA states that "due to the small size of the proposed project site, existing disturbances, and proximity to surrounding development, impacts to these sensitive species are not considered significant." However, the MND does not include survey data indicating whether any of the above -listed species occur on- site, an analysis of the number of individuals expected to occupy the site, or an estimation of the regional population of the species. Please clarify what the impacts to the above -listed species are expected to be, and provide a thorough and detailed mitigation proposal to offset the temporal, permanent, and cumulative impacts. 3. Impacts to Sensitive Natural Communities. The Biological Resources section of the IS checklist indicates that there will be "no impact" on "riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or other regional plans, P741 Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration Day Creek Marketplace and Residential Project SCH No. 2015101018 Page 3 of 5 policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service". This is incorrect: the project site supports Riversidean alluvial fan sage scrub (RAFSS), a state designated S-1.1 "very threatened" community. Page 5 of the BRA states that "because (the on-site RAFSS) is disturbed and isolated from larger blocks of habitat, the loss of 10 acres of (RAFSS) is not considered substantial." The Department does not concur with this conclusion, and considers net loss of this imperiled habitat to be adverse and significant. We recommend that the MND be revised to include a thorough and detailed analysis of the temporal, permanent, and cumulative impacts to RAFSS habitat. The Department considers sensitive plant communities to be imperiled habitats having both local and regional significance. Plant communities, alliances, and associations with a statewide ranking of S-1, S-2, S-3, and S-4 should be considered sensitive and declining at the local and regional level. These ranks can be obtained by querying the CNDDB and are included in The Manual of California Vegetation (Sawyer et al. 2009). The Department strongly encourages the City and the project applicant to avoid and conserve the on-site RAFSS habitat to the greatest extent feasible. If complete avoidance is not possible, the Department recommends that the City revise the MND to include a thorough and detailed mitigation proposal to address the temporal, permanent, and cumulative impacts. 4. Impacts to Streambed Habitat. Page 3 of the BRA characterizes the on-site ephemeral stream as "a drainage ditch created by roadside runoff," and states that it "does not contain CDFW riparian habitat and is not considered a natural waterway regulated by CDFW." The Department does not concur with this statement. Based on a review of aerial photography, and the photographs supplied in Figure 4A of the BRA, it is likely that the project applicant will need to notify the Department per Fish and Game Code section 1602. Fish and Game Code section 1602 requires an entity to notify the Department prior to commencing any activity that may do one or more of the following: Substantially divert or obstruct the natural flow of any river, stream or lake; Substantially change or use any material from the bed, channel or bank of any river, stream, or lake; or Deposit debris, waste or other materials that could pass into any river, stream or lake. Please note that "any river, stream or lake" includes those that are episodic (i.e., those that are dry for periods of time) as well as those that are perennial (i.e., those that flow year round). This includes ephemeral streams, desert washes, and watercourses with a subsurface flow. It may also apply to work undertaken within the flood plain of a body of water. Upon receipt of a complete notification, the Department determines if the proposed project activities may substantially adversely affect existing fish and P742 Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration Day Creek Marketplace and Residential Project SCH No. 2015101018 Page 4 of 5 wildlife resources and whether a Lake and Streambed Alteration (LSA) Agreement is required. An LSA Agreement includes measures necessary to protect existing fish and wildlife resources. CDFW may suggest ways to modify your project that would eliminate or reduce harmful impacts to fish and wildlife resources. The Department's issuance of an LSA Agreement is a "project" subject to CEQA (see Pub. Resources Code 21065). To facilitate issuance of an LSA Agreement, if necessary, the MND should fully identify the potential impacts to the lake, stream, or riparian resources, and provide adequate avoidance, mitigation, and monitoring and reporting commitments. Early consultation with the Department is recommended, since modification of the proposed project may be required to avoid or reduce impacts to fish and wildlife resources. To obtain a Lake or Streambed Alteration notification package, please go to https://www.wildlife.ca.gov/Conservation/LSA/Forms. 5. Nesting Birds. Mitigation Measure 1 states that a breeding bird survey shall be required to determine whether nesting is occurring "ten days prior to ground clearing activities". The Department recommends that the City revise Mitigation Measure 1 to require nesting bird surveys to occur no more than three (3) days prior to vegetation removal or ground -disturbing activities, as many species of birds may complete nest building in fewer than ten days. Page 18 of the IS identifies the avian nesting season as February 1 through August 31. However, some species of raptors may commence nesting as early as January 1, while some passerines may continue to nest after August 31. Therefore, the Department recommends that nesting bird surveys occur regardless of the time of year. The Department appreciates the opportunity to comment on the Initial Study and proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Day Creek Marketplace and Residential Project (State Clearinghouse Number 2015101018), and requests that the City address the Department's comments and concerns prior to adoption of the MND. If you should have any questions pertaining to these comments, please contact Gabriele Quillman at (909) 980-3818 or at gabriele.quillman@wildlife.ca.gov. Sincerely, Lesl)�Mac air MN Regi nal Manager cc: State Clearinghouse, Sacramento P743 Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration Day Creek Marketplace and Residential Project SCH No. 2015101018 Page 5 of 5 Literature Cited Braden, G., and R. McKernan. 2000. A Data Based Survey Protocol and Quantitative Description of Suitable Habitat for the Endangered San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat. Sari Bernardino County Museum. June 2000. 35 pp Sawyer, J. O., T. Keeler -Wolf, and J. M. Evens. 2009. A manual of California Vegetation, 2nd ed. California Native Plant Society Press, Sacramento, California. http://vegetation.cnps.org/ P744 GUIDELINES FOR GOOD EXTERIOR LIGHTING PLANS Prepared by: The Dark Sky Society (http://xv«1v.darksl.-;,socien,.orgL) 2009 These guidelines have been developed in consultation Nvith lighting professionals (Nvith experience in developing good lighting plans) to aid communities wishing to control light pollution and preserve the night sky. Outdoor lighting should be carefully designed with regard to placement, intensity, timing, duration, and color. Good lighting will: • Promote Safety "More light" is not necessarily" better". If not designed and installed correctly, unsafe glare can result, reducing the effect of lighting which can contribute to accidents and hinder visibility. Lighting that is too bright interferes with the eye's ability to adapt to darker areas. • Save Money Adhering to professionally recommended light levels provides adequate illumination. Shielded fixtures with efficient light bulbs are more cost-effective because they use less energy by directing the light toward the ground. See this website for cost comparisons: http:i/www.netacc.net/—i)oulsen/ii.ghtcost.litml • Conserve Natural Resources Inappropriate or excessive lighting wastes our limited natural resources and pollutes the air and water by unnecessarily burning our limited supply of fossil fuels. • Be Better Neighbors Excessive or misdirected lighting can intrude on the privacy of others when light or glare trespasses over property lines. • Retain Community's Character and Reduce Skyglow Our clear view of the dark starry night sky is a resource to be preserved and protected. Stray and excessive lighting contributes to "light pollution", clutter, and unnatural "sky glow". • Protect Ecology of Flora and Fauna Research studies indicate that artificial night lighting disrupts the migrating, feeding, and breeding habits of many wildlife species, as well as growth patterns of trees. See references in The Ecological Consequences of Artificial Night Lighting. ■ Reduce Health Risks Light at night not only disrupts your sleep but also interferes with your circadian rhythms. Recent research indicates that intrusive lighting may reduce the production of melatonin, a beneficial hormone, and a resulting raise in the rates of breast and other cancers. Included: 1. Diagrams of Acceptable/Unacceptable Lighting Fixtures 2. How to Develop an Acceptable Lighting Plan 3. Definitions of Full Cut Off, Shielded, and RLM sign lighting Fixtures 4. Lighting Plan Submissions 5. Recommended Illumination Levels for various tasks P745 UNSHIELDED FIXTURES Unacceptable / Discouraged Fixtures that produce glare and light trespass Ll i Unshielded Streetli ht Sag -lens Drop -lens w/ exposed light source Unshielded "Colonial -type" fixtures or Dusk to Dawn Secunly fixtures , W , Drop -lens canopy fixtures Diagrams courtesy of Bob Crehn Full Cutoff and Fully Shielded Fixtures Acceptable Fixtures that shield the light source, to reduce glare and light trespass and to facilitate better vision at night. Fully-shlelded Fixtures "Full cutoff" Fixtures Fully -shielded Wallpacks Full cutoff or shielded "Colonial -type" fixtures Yvl IAy Flush -mounted canopy fixtures *****Ask your local electrical suppliers for "full -cut off" or "fully shielded" light fixtures. Once you have selected fixtures which are compatible with your architecture and community, contact the manufacturer's representative to see a sample of the fixture(s) and to ask for a free lighting plan. If you have a CAD file, the plan can be easily provided in a short period of time. ***** Most lighting manufacturers have Application Departments which will execute free lighting plans to meet local lighting codes. See this website for links to manufacturers: http://www.darks4,.org/mc/page.do?sitePageId=56422&orgId=idsa Sample of Web retailers: wwiv.starrynightlights.com and www.greenearthlighting.com iL I:1 How to Develop an Acceptable Lighting Plan 1. Identify where as well as when lighting is needed. Confine and minimize lighting to the extent necessary to meet safety purposes. Plans should define the areas for which illumination is planned. Itemizing each area (e.g. parking lot, doorways, walkways, signage, foliage) with the anticipated hours of use. Commercial outdoor lighting should be used for safe pedestrian passage and property identification, and lit during active business hours and shut off afterward. 2. Direct light downward by choosing the correct type of light fixtures. (See Appendix 3). Specify IES (Illuminating Engineering Society) "Full Cut Off' designated or "fully shielded" fixtures, so that no light is emitted above the lowest light emitting part of the fixture. Top mounted sign lighting is recommended with "RLM" (dish) type shields, and aimed so that the light falls entirely on the sign and is positioned so that the light source (bulb) is not visible from any point off the property or into the roadway to reduce glare. For each one square foot of sign, usually no more than 200 lumens is necessary for good visibility. 3. Select the correct light source (bulb type). Compact fluorescent (2300I) or High Pressure Sodium is recommended unless the light is motion sensor activated, in which case incandescent or the instant start compact fluorescent bulbs can be used. Metal Halide (due to its higher costs, energy use, impact on the environment, and greater contribution to "sky glow") is discouraged, as well as light sources rated over 3000 Kelvin; and outdated Mercury Vapor bulbs are prohibited. 4. Utilize "shut off' controls such as sensors, timers, motion detectors, etc. Automatic controls turn off lights when not needed. All lights should be extinguished no later than one half hour after the close of business. Additional motion sensor activated lighting can be used for emergency access. Avoid "dusk -to -dawn" sensors without a middle of the night shut off control. Lights alone will not serve to "protect" property and are a poor "security" device. Examine other means of protecting property and to discourage criminal activity. Let your local police know that you have a "lights out" policy so that they can investigate if they see lights or activity after hours. 5. Limit the height of fixtures. Locate fixtures no closer to the property line than four times the mounting height of the fixture, and not to exceed the height of adjacent structures. (Exceptions may be made for larger parking areas, commercial zones adjacent to highways, or for fixtures with greater cut off shielding behind the pole mount in commercial zones.) 6. Limit light crossing property lines, i.e. "light trespass". Limit light to spill across the property lines. Light levels at the property line should not exceed 0.1 footcandles (fc) adjacent to business properties, and 0.05 fc at residential property boundaries. Utility leased floodlight fixtures mounted on public utility poles in the public right-of-way should not be used. 7. Use the correct amount of light. Light levels and uniformity ratios should not exceed recommended values, per IESNA RP -33 or 20. (See Appendix 5, Recommended Illumination Levels for various tasks.) "Lumen cap" recommendations for areas to be illuminated are as follows: commercial properties in non -urban commercial zones = 25,000 lumens per acre; for projects in residential and LBO zones = 10,000 lumens per acre. For residential properties: for suburban: 50,000 lumens per acre cap, and in urban areas: 100,000. 8. Ask for Assistance Your Planning Department and local lighting sales representatives can assist you in obtaining the necessary information for good lighting. For large projects over 15,000 lumens: greater energy conservation and control of light pollution, light trespass and glare, may be achieved with the help of a professional lighting designer with "dark sky" lighting plan experience. 9. A post installation inspection should be conducted to check for compliance. Substitutions by electricians and contractors are common and should not be accepted. Final Approved Site Plans will not allow additional exterior fixtures or substitutes without reviews. 10. Design interior lighting so that it does not illuminate the outdoors. Provide interior lighting photometrics for the building's perimeter areas, demonstrating that the interior lighting falls substantially within the building and not through the windows. After closing, interior lighting that extends outdoors needs to be extinguished by the use of shut off timers. 3 Definition of Acceptable Fixtures: "Full Cut Off', "Fully Shielded", and RLM shield. Full cutoff fixture 80" ' 90" - No light at or above 90" - Uss tbatl 100 cd pct 1000 lamp lumcns ac of abovc 800 "Full Cut Off' fixtures are independently certified by the manufacturers, and do not allow light to be emitted above the fixture and the fixture reduces glare by limiting the light output to less than 10% at and below 10 degrees below the horizontal. If the manufacturer is unable to provide the "cut off' characteristics for a fixture (also called a "luminaire"), the following definition needs to be met, which can usually be determined by a visual inspection: "Fully Shielded": a fixture constructed and installed in such a manner that all light emitted by it, either directly from the lamp (bulb) or a diffusing element, or indirectly by reflection or refraction from any part of the fixture, is projected below the horizontal. This can be determined by a "field test" or a visual assessment of an operating sample. Manufacturers and their representatives can provide photographs of light fixtures as "cut sheets" as well as literature confirming the independently tested "cut off" characteristics of their products. These IES files may be assessed for compliance in a computer program: http://www.3dop.com/indexl.html Photometric layouts for different heights, light sources, and wattages, are also available as "IES" files, upon request or through manufacturers' websites. Fixtures must be installed properly, so that the bottom of the fixture is level with the ground. Exceptions are often given for sign lighting which requires vertical lighting: "RLM" sign lighting shield: 4 P747 P748 Lighting Plan Submissions The following information needs to be provided to your municipality's review board which will enable them to evaluate the Site Plan for proper exterior lighting: The Lighting Plan should be depicted on a site plan, indicating the location of each current and proposed outdoor lighting fixture with projected hours of use. This plan will need to be stamped and certified by a licensed professional, such as an architect or engineer. Many lighting manufacturers can provide free photometric layouts on prepared site plans, to conform to your local requirements. (1) The lighting plan should include a Is'EY to the proposed lighting that provides the following information: • Type and number of luminaire equipment (fixtures), including the "cut off characteristics", indicating manufacturer and model number(s). • Lamp source type (bulb type, i.e. high pressure sodium), lumen output, and wattage. • Mounting height with distance noted to the nearest property line for each luminaire. • Types of timing devices used to control the hours set for illumination, as well as the proposed hours when each fixture will be operated. • Total Lumens for each fixture, and total square footage of areas to be illuminated. For projects that are in commercial zones, the lumens per net acre to be lit, need not exceed 25,000 lumens. For projects in residential or LBO zones: 10,000 lumens. • For all plans of more than three fixtures: A Calculation Summary indicating footcandle levels on the lighting plan, noting the maximum, average and minimum, as well as the uniformity ratio of maximum to minimum, and average to minimum levels*. (2) Lighting manufacturer -supplied specifications ("cut sheets") that include photographs of the fixtures, indicating the certified "cut off characteristics" of the fixture. (3) Footcandle Distribution, plotting the light levels in footcandles on the ground, at the designated mounting heights for the proposed fixtures. Maximum illuminance levels should be expressed in footcandle measurements on a grid of the site showing footcandle readings in every five or ten -foot square. The grid shall include light contributions from all sources (i.e. pole mounted, wall mounted, sign, and street lights.) Show footcandle renderings five feet beyond the property lines.* (4) If requested by the reviewing agency, a statement from a lighting professional that a plan, other than that set forth, is needed to meet the intent of these standards. (5) An environmental impact statement may be required as to the impact of the exterior lighting proposed on flora, fauna, and the night sky. Location of species sensitive to light at night or the proximity to nature preserves or astronomical observatories or "Dark Sky Parks", needs to be indicated. (6) On the Approved Plan it should be noted that no substitutions, additions, or changes may be made without prior approval by the governing authority. * This information can be obtained from the manufacturer, your lighting supplier, or the manufacturer's representative. itV:. Recommended Illumination Levels for various tasks* I. Table of Limits of Illumination, measured in footcandles (fc) at ground level unless noted: Task Area Avg. Not to exceed: 1. Active Building Entrance 2.0 fc 5 fc Approach 0.2 fc 2. Gas Station Approach 2 fc 3. Gas Station Pump Area avg: 5 fc 4. Gas Station Service Area 5. Sidewalks 6. Surface of signs avg. 3 fc 0.2 fc 5 fc 2 fc II. Average/Minimum/Uniformity Ratio Limits for Parking Lots: I. Public Parking Lots -- not to exceed: Average Minimum Uniformity Ratio (Max to Min/Avg to Min) 0.8 0.2 20:1 / 4:1 II. Private Parking Lots -- not to exceed: Average Minimum Uniformity Ratio (Max to Min / Avg to Min) 0.5 0.13 20:1 / 4:1 OR: III. If illuminance grid lighting plans cannot be reviewed or if fixtures do not provide photometrics and bulbs are under 2000 lumens, use these guidelines: 1. Pole shall be no greater in height than four times the distance to the Property line. 2. Maximum Lumen Levels for different fixture heights: Mounting Height (Feet) Recommended Lumen Maximums 6 500 - 1000 lumens 8 600 - 1,600 lumens 10 1,000 - 2,000 lumens 12 1,600 - 2,400 lumens FOOTCANDLE: ("FC") — Is the basic unit of illuminance (the amount of light falling on a surface). Footcandle measurement is taken with a hand held light meter. One footcandle is equivalent to the illuminance produced on one square foot of surface area by a source of one candle at a distance of one foot. Horizontal footcandles measure the illumination striking a horizontal plane. Footcandle values can be measured directly with certain handheld incident light meters. LUMEN— A unit used to measure the actual amount of light that is produced by a bulb. The lumen quantifies the amount of light energy produced by a lamp at the lamp, not by the energy input, which is indicated by the "wattage". For example, a 75 -watt incandescent lamp can produce 1000 lumens while a 70 - watt high-pressure sodium lamp produces 6000 lumens. Lumen output is listed by the manufacturer on the packaging. * IES, Recommended Practices, (RP -33-99): Lighting for Exterior Environments: and (RP -20): Parking Lots. The Illuminating Engineering Society of North America (IES or IESNA), is an organization that establishes updated standards and illumination guidelines for the lighting industry. http:/ /,,v,.v-,v.iesna.org/shop/item-detail.cfm?ID=RP-33-99&storeid=l http:/ /-,vww.iesna.org/shop/item-detail.cfm?ID=RP-20-98&storeid=l P750 ALLUVIAL SCRUB VEGETATION IN COASTAL SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA' Ted L. Hanes, Richard D. Friesen, and Kathy Keane2 Abstract: Certain floodplain systems in southern Cali- fornia sustain a unique scrub vegetation rather than ri- parian woodlands due to a lack of perennial water. Allu- vial scrub occurs on outwash fans and riuerine deposits along the coastal side of major mountains of southern California. This vegetation type is adapted to severe floods and erosion, nutrient poor substrates, and the presence of subsurface moisture. Ten major stands were sampled by line intercepts to determine their species composition, community structure, and successional sta- tus. Plant ecology and successional dynamics of these stands are compared. Loss of this unique floodplain veg- etation type in the past, and current urban pressures from mining and flood control practices are discussed. Scrub vegetation in California is extensive and di- verse, occupying coastal and desert dunes, coastal val- leys and foothills, interior mountains and desert flats. Holland (1986), in the State's Preliminary Descriptions of the Terrestrial Natural Communities of California, recognizes 73 different scrub types endemic to Califor- nia. However, one scrub type not included in these de- scriptions is the unique and threatened vegetation called alluvial scrub. This vegetation is considered a unique habitat with a high priority for preservation by the Cal- ifornia Natural Diversity Data Base (1987). Alluvial scrub is an open vegetation adapted to the harsh conditions of the outwash environment. It grows on sandy, rocky alluvia deposited by streams that experience infrequent episodes of severe flooding. This vegetation dominates major outwash fans at the mouths of canyons along the coastal side of the San Gabriel, San Bernardino, and San Jacinto Mountains and lesser floodplain and riverine locations of southern California. Some alluvial scrub species occur also in sandy washes of coastal southern California apart from alluvial fans and large rivers. Alluvial scrub is composed of an assortment of drought - deciduous subshrubs and large evergreen woody shrubs that are adapted to the porous, low fertility substrate as well as to survival of intense, periodic flooding and ero- sion. Step-like shrub covered terraces above the wash channels exhibit different phases of alluvial scrub vege- tation. These phases are related to the amount of time that has elapsed since the most recent flood at each level. Three types of alluvial scrub have been recog- nized and are related to such factors as the scouring action of flood channels, distance from the flood chan- nel, time since the last catastrophic flood, and substrate features such as texture and moisture content (Smith 1980). The three types can be referred to as: pioneer - vegetation is sparse and of low species diversity and stature, and is found within active stream channels or recently scoured streambeds; intermediate - vegetation is rather dense and is composed mainly of subshrubs; and mature - vegetation is composed of fully developed subshrubs and woody shrubs. Mature alluvial scrub is distinguished by its vege- tative composition, which contrasts in several respects with that of coastal sage scrub as described by Axelrod (1978), Cooper (1922), Epling and Lewis (1942), Kirk- patrick and Hutchinson (1977), Mooney (1988), Smith (1980), and Westman (1981a,b). Specifically, (1) allu- vial scrub has more mesic species than most coastal sage scrub stands; (2) alluvial scrub consists of nu- merous evergreen shrubs, a diverse assemblage of sub - shrubs, and a springtime ground cover of annual wild- flowers, whereas coastal sage scrub vegetation is com- posed primarily of drought -deciduous subshrubs with sparse, if any, annual wildflowers; (3) scalebroom (Lep- idospartum , quamatum), a shrub with high fidelity to alluvial substrates, is found throughout alluvial scrub communities, but seldom in coastal sage scrub vegeta- tion; (4) species commonly found in chaparral or desert plant assemblages, such as California redberry (Rham- nus crocea), lemonadeberry (Rhus integrifolia), sugar - bush (Rhus ovata), mountain mahogany (Cercocarpus betuloides), holly -leaved cherry (Prunus ilicifolia), Cali- fornia juniper (Juniperus californica), and yucca (Yucca whipplei) are also common in the alluvial scrub com- munity, but not in coastal sage scrub vegetation; and (5) small-statured riparian woodland species, such as California sycamore (Platanus racemosa) and mulefat (Baccharis glutinosa) are laced through alluvial scrub stands along major drainages, but are not present in stands of coastal sage scrub. Presented at the California Riparian Systems Conference; September 22-24, 1988; Davis, California. 7 Professor of Botany, California State University, Fullerton, Fullerton, Calif.; Senior Ecologist and Staff Ecologist respectively, Michael Brandman Associates (MBA(, Santa Ana, Calif. USDA Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-110. 1989. 187 SIMI VALLEY* � OVOAKS �— ie• ti I I $UNLAND 2 I 56 SLE oii PASADENA BERNARgNO • AZUSA SAN • 1 /7 RIVERSI ANGELES „ SAN 8 JAGNTO•� • , LONG oa ANT BEACH\ANA "' .HEMET •` iS— ` Legend /\J BIO TUJUNGA WASHBAN SEVAINE/ �1 FETIWANDA/DAY CREEKS SAN GABRIEL RIVER ©CAJON/LYTLE CREEKS SAN ANTONIO CREEK MMENTONE AREA OF SANTA ANA RIVER �'•� ®CUCAMONGA CREEK ®SAN JACINTO RIVER OCEANSIDE ,. �.� . ESCONDIDO Figure 1— Distribution of major stands of alluvial scrub vegetation in southern California, U.S.A. Methods Ten stands of alluvial scrub vegetation were studied, comprising the largest, intact stands in southern Califor- nia. These stands are associated with the Big Tujunga Wash and San Gabriel River (Los Angeles County); Cu- camonga, Day, Etiwanda, San Sevaine, Lytle, and Cajon Creeks and the San Antonio and Santa Ana Rivers (San Bernardino County); and the San Jacinto River (River- side County), (fig. 1). Each stand was sampled by a series of 20 m line intercepts. Several "lines of march" along a compass line perpendicular to the associated stream channel were established within each of the alluvial scrub study sites, beginning at the edge of the stream channel in most cases and progressively moving up onto the higher stream terraces until reaching the site boundary. At 30 m intervals (50 m intervals in degraded alluvial scrub), a 20 m line intercept, perpendicular to the line of march, was established. The intercepts alternated at each interval from right to left of the line of march. Only P751 subshrubs and evergreen woody shrubs were measured. Plants that were bisected by the intercept line (as projected vertically) were identified by species. Their intercept lengths (to the nearest 5 cm) were recorded, and the number of dead and live individuals of each species was counted along each 20 m intercept. Any intercept length not containing shrub cover was recorded as "bare ground." Intercept data were grouped by development stage of alluvial scrub vegetation (pioneer, intermediate, or mature) for each site. The values derived were used to describe and quantify the structural and successional composition and status of each alluvial scrub site. Physical Setting Soils The floodplain soils upon which alluvial scrub oc- curs is of two types. Riverwash Association soils are 188 USDA Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-110. 1989. found along the main river channels and consist of river - deposited sands, gravels, cobbles and stones. Inunda- tion occurs each year and is accompanied by scouring, deposition, and removal depending upon the intensity and number of rainstorms each winter. All vegeta- tion is scoured from the main channel during peak flow episodes. Soboba Association soils are located along the ter- raced banks of the river and are formed of alluvium on the outwash of the rivers. Soboba soils have a cob- bly, coarse loamy sand surface underlain by pale brown, single -grain, loosely stratified very gravelly and cobbly sand or loamy sand subsoils. These soils are excessively drained and exhibit very high permeability, very slow runoff, low water -holding capacity and low fertility. Climate The climate of the study area is Mediterranean, with an annual rainfall of approximately 460 mm, most of which falls during a few heavy winter storms. Once every 10 to 20 years, rainfall far exceeds the norm, resulting in catastrophic floods, such as 1938 and 1969. During such past floods, the rivers have carried debris eroded from upstream slopes and riverbeds, forming broad rocky al- luvial outwash fans nearly 600 m thick. The river chan- nels within the fans are subject to frequent scouring and flooding resulting in a barren state. The most signifi- cant recent floods in the study area occurred in 1938 and 1969. These and previous major floods produced flood- plain terraces bordering the main channels and upon which the three recognizable phases of alluvial scrub veg- etation have developed. P752 Site Conditions The sample sites exhibit many similar conditions as well as a few distinctive features. Table 1 summarizes the various site conditions and features. Results A total of 237 plant species was encountered on the 10 study sites. To facilitate comparison of species composition between the sites, importance values were calculated for each species. Table 2 lists those species with importance values greater than 5.0 for each site. Eriogonum fasciculatum was an important compo- nent of all 10 sites. Lepidospartum squamatum occurred on 9 of the 10 sites. Saluia apiana and Lotus scopar- ius were next in importance, occurring in 6 of the 10 sites. Artemisia californica occurred on 4 of the 10 sites. Longer -lived, woody species that characterized mature stands (see fig. 2) often had importance values less than 5.0 and are not shown in Table 2. Most (6) of the sites were composed of all three successional stages, but a few sites had two or only one stage. Lytle Creek lacked mature alluvial scrub, whereas San Sevaine lacked intermediate scrub, and Etiwanda lacked both pioneer and mature stages. Presence and absence of developmental stages reflected various factors such as upstream damming or channelization, time since the last major flood, human disturbances, or soil moisture. Table 1 - Summary of the Alluvial Scrub Sample Site Conditions and Features (material adapted from Michael Brandman Associates. 1988) Site Acreage Location Conditions and Features San Jacinto 2,677 Upper San Relatively undisturbed except for small sand and gravel operation, golf course Jacinto River downstream; limited water conservation dikes, diversion channels, and percolation basins. Mentone 11,440 Upper Santa Variously disturbed by rock and sand quarries, aqueducts and railways; industrial, River commercial, and residential developments; extensive flood control and water conservation facilities Cajon/ Lytle 17,347 Cajon and Lytle Crossed by 2 railroad tracks, old Route 66, and (combined) Interstates 15 and Creeks Creeks 215. Residential and commercial developments along Route 66 and portions of (Combined) Cajon and Cable Canyons. Quarrying operations in lower Lytle Creek San Sevaine/ 12,531 San Sevaine/ Large lateral flood control dikes, diversion canals, and percolation basin. Major Etiwanda/Day Day Canyon electric transmission corridor and water treatment plant. New extensive residen- Canyons outwash tial developments south and west. Cucamonga 3,091 Cucamonga Flood control structures and percolation basin; small rock quarry. Surrounded by Canyon outwash residential developments. San Antonio 2,318 San Antonio Streamflow controlled outwash by dam and large lateral dikes. Two highways Canyon outwash cross the site. Quarry operation, small airport and commercial buildings present San Gabriel 300 San Gabriel Streamflow controlled outwash by dams, major lateral dikes, drop structures, and Canyon outwash percolation basins. Crossed by Route 66 and Interstate 210. Paved bikeway on east dike. Major quarrying operations. Dam, recreation area, and county natural area downstream. Big Tujunga 1,587 Big Tujunga Natural braided floodplain flanked by hills. Bisected by Interstate 210. Dam, Canyon recreation area, and quarrying operation downstream. outwash USDA Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-110. 1989. 189 P753 Table 2 - Comparison of Species Composition of Ten Alluvial Scrub Stands Using Importance Values Greater Than 5.0* Site Dominant Importance Values by Development Stage Pioneer Intermediate Mature San Jacinto Artemisia dracunculus 7.74 16.77 4.13 Baccharis glutinosa 16.10 0.82 Croton californica 7.13 8.02 Ericameria palmeri 4.96 4.25 Eriodictyon crassifolium 1.75 11.61 Eriogonum fasciculatum 10.59 31.54 41.17 Lepidospartum squamatum 35.86 28.84 12.11 Lycium andersond 0.94 7.76 7.48 Opuntia parryi 0.82 7.38 Rhamnus crocea 9.51 Salvia apiana 5.38 Mentone Adenostoma fasciculatum 28.96 Baccharis glutinosa 8.24 Ericameria palmeri 19.50 3.91 Eriodictyon trichocalyx 17.43 3.63 Eriogonum fasciculatum 84.35 33.93 16.88 Lepidospartum squamatum 7.40 Yucca whipplei 6.63 1.23 Cajon Eriodictyon trichocalyx 18.20 18.79 12.00 Eriogonum fasciculatum 51.18 18.87 8.76 Lepidospartum squamatum 5.98 8.88 Lotus scoparius 13.10 12.38 7.51 Opuntia littoralis 4.34 4.69 7.84 Saluia apiana 5.05 12.18 Toxicodendron divers /ohm 3.95 8.42 Yucca whipplei 4.30 12.46 16.74 Lytle Creek Artemisia dracuncutus 2.25 16.25 Eriodictyon trichocalyx 8.00 Eriogonum fasciculatum 63.20 30.98 Lepidospartum squamatum 30.19 5.43 Lotus scoparius 1.10 5.19 Opuntia littoralis 1.08 5.48 Opuntia parryi 1.08 7.88 Salvia apiana 1.08 6.10 San Sevaine Adenostoma fasciculatum 9.12 Artemisia californica 6.28 17.04 Cercocarpus betuloides 15.05 15.70 Eriogonum fasciculatum 37.35 25.96 Lepidospartum squamatum 15.04 7.32 Lotus scoparius 10.64 1.38 Saluia apiana 19.40 14.08 Edwanda Croton californica 7.54 Eriogonum fasciculatum 33.48 Lotus scoparius 9.06 Salvia opiana 43.70 Cucamonga Adenostoma fasciculatum 6.34 Artemisia californica 22.69 12.30 23.70 Eriodictyon trichocalyx 30.70 11.91 Eriogonum fasciculatum 37.54 21.09 23.19 Lepidospartum squamatum 30.46 16.65 11.73 Lotus scoparius 7.47 1.88 Rhamnus crocea 6.54 San Antonio Achillea millefolium 9.50 8.13 Artemisia californica 29.67 41.25 Ericameria pinifolia 10.67 Eriogonum fasciculatum 10.09 14.51 Lepidospartum squamatum 4.91 15.94 Lotus scoparius 6.69 hfalosma (-Rhus) laurina 8.13 Salvia mellifera 12.99 2.22 San Gabriel Artemisia californica 2.12 11.79 Brickellia californica 8.10 Eriogonum fasciculatum 22.76 12.19 Lepidospartum squamatum 31.43 22.53 13.02 Opuntia littoralis 17.03 22.07 Rhus integrifolia. 7.76 Big Tujunga Baccharis glutinosa 29.29 Ericameria linearifolia 8.37 5.18 Ericameria pinifolia 2.41 5.08 Eriogonum fasciculatum 33.56 36.39 33.37 Lepidospartum squamatum 13.89 15.25 9.72 Opuntia parryi 5.31 2.21 Ribes aureum 1.36 1.35 5.97 Salix sp. 4.53 9.85 Yucca whipplei 3.35 10.48 12.71 *Standard importance values were utilized and divided by 3 to convert them to a base of 100 for convenience. 190 USDA Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-110. 1989. 1 INCREASING FLOOD EVENT PROBABILITY P754 MATUREPHASE INTERMEDIATE PHASE PIONEER PHASE I REP RE BE NTAT I VE SPECIESI .REPRESENTATIVE SPECIES) (REPRESENTATIVE SPECIES ).Plea - e.. 1epleewriu. w .. - ur-bsew p.Paew lu..[ ..1 . wN-r.P. 41ee.re.11ee..Iel.rnl -UeAVMe ere 1 MY+I.e weAM� - w[. rP� •� [newnn 1[r.seeriPrw Gtlbrwe p.[ I Lrlaprnuin N Whla I.r - 6eW.[ Y.e+re Mr In.prlMe - rw.eernl 4.NW u w Vuw �. • r IN— pbtlo.[ —1. Wbwe rurll.. r.w[e W,.rVnebrM1rN IerY .na [ RM+n�. Brow - �eMn[ Osune. wrr Ll •.Iwr •esY R4r a Oeaen [ural [nee..ne e1l[bl[ • eli. pnWne u. J C YM1I[ �n[•er.e - aP .uw +NppN[ - It— .-I UU Op— Ylb[e[ [.I ...1' Z 1�eee.0 a14No. -- p[Iwnle tyNMr Z M y Y IX f: J e 'I • Lam'"`^ ���'�'7,a. Q PARTICLE SIZE SORTED H �' ,f SUBSTRATUM FROM PREVIOUS W 7• FLOODING AND DEPOSITION V rcW4 k .rI• '71r .. _ EVENTS --- -4-tisr -" -QQ1iP."il(pTFT}bs: MUDFLOW LENS �61C..� No horizontal scale Figure 2- Profile diagram of alluvial scrub vegetation, showing representation of the three phases of development and their representative species. In order to quantify compositional and structural fea- tures of the 3 phases of alluvial scrub at each sample site and to compare the 10 stands, various indices were used: native plant species diversity, percent dominance of the shrub component, and structural diversity of the shrub component (Table 3). These indices were standardized to values between 0.0 and 1.0 against an ideal condition in a manner similar to the Habitat Evaluation Proce- dure (HEP) developed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS 1980). The procedure for establish- ing and standardizing these indices are currently being documented in a manuscript in preparation by Friesen, Jones, and Keane, and are being referred to as a Habitat Quality Assessment (HQA). San Jacinto, Cajon, and Big Tujunga sites exhibited the greatest species diversity of 8 sites. Etiwanda showed the smallest species diversity, having neither pioneer nor mature stages. Cajon and Cucamonga sites had the highest shrub component of 8 sites with San Jacinto and Big Tujung a sites nearly as high. As with species diversity, the Etiwanda site showed the lowest shrub component. The Cajon and San Gabriel sites exhibited the great- est structural diversity of 8 sites with Etiwanda showing the lowest structural diversity. Current Status The distinctive character of alluvial scrub vegetation as it relates to flood -deposited alluvia, makes it one of California's unique riparian systems (fig. 2). The inten- sity and magnitude of episodic floods creates recogniz- able vegetation phases that are related to both the age of the stand and to the site conditions of substrate and soil moisture. As a stand develops along a time gradi- ent from pioneer to mature, there is a general trend in species composition replacement from short-lived sub - shrubs to long-lived woody shrubs. Severe flooding as well as fire and man -caused disturbances can eliminate existing stands of alluvial scrub, and thus initiate new pioneer stands. In contrast, a lack of sufficient soil mois- ture can prevent an intermediate stage stand from pro- gressing to the mature stage. This condition is best illus- trated in the Etiwanda stand. Such intermediate stands may be old in years, but not fully mature in species composition and stature. USDA Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-110. 1989. 191 folium ssp. sanctorum) is a much -branched subshrub now restricted to sandy soils on river floodplains or ter- raced alluvial deposits of the upper Santa Ana River drainage, San Bernardino County. These sites mostly are on privately owned and Bureau of Land Management lands. The Corps of Engineers currently is supporting research on the ecology of the woolly -star. Slender -horned spineflower (Centrostegia leptoceras) is a delicate prostrate annual found on fine -textured, flood deposited river terraces and washes in Los An- geles, Riverside and San Bernardino counties. Extant populations are small and seriously threatened. Most occurrences are on private land and are unprotected. Future Prospects At present there is no program of conservation that will ensure the future existence of alluvial scrub vege- tation. However, the designation of this vegetation by the California Natural Diversity Data Base (1987) as a unique habitat with a high priority for preservation is a worthy first step. Yet, this designation lacks legal power. The presence of the two rare and endangered plant species in some of the alluvial scrub stands brings both state and federal agencies into action in the protec- tion and management of these alluvial scrub endemics. To a limited extent some alluvial scrub stands are the beneficiary of these agencies' actions. Urban development pressures and flood control struc- tures and practices increasingly will threaten alluvial scrub by direct removal or indirectly by altering the dy- namics of its hydrology. Only through the acquisition and management of major stands of alluvial scrub can its future be secured. References Axelrod, D. I. 1978. The origin of coastal sage vegetation, Alta and Baja California. American Journal of Botany 65(10):1117-1131. Barbour, M. G. and J. Major, eds. 1988. Terrestrial vegetation of California. 2nd Edition. Sacramento, Calif.: California Native Plant Society, Special Publication No. 9. 1030 p. California Natural Diversity Data Base (CNDDB). 1987. Data base record search for information on threatened, endangered, rare or otherwise sensitive species and com- munities in the vicinity of the rivers and streams in this study. California Department of Fish and Game, State of California Resources Agency, Sacramento, Calif. Cooper, W. S. 1922. The broad- sclerophyll vegetation of California. An ecological study of chaparral and its related communities. Carnegie Institute of Washington Publication 319. 124 p. P755 Epling, C. and H. Lewis. 1942. The centers of distribution of the chaparral and coastal sage associations. American Midland Naturalist 27:445-462. Hanes, T. L.. 1976. Vegetation types of the San Gabriel Mountains. In: J. Latting, ed., Plant communities of southern California. Berkeley, Calif.: California Native Plant Society, Special Publication No. 2. Hanes, T. L. 1971. Succession after fire in the chaparral of southern California. Ecological Monographs 41:27-52. Hanes, T. L. 1984. Vegetation of the Santa Ana River and some flood control implications. In: Warner, R. and Hen- drix, K., eds. California riparian systems -ecology, con- servation and productive management. Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press, 882-888 pp. Hanes, T. L. 1973. The San Gabriel River floodplain, pp 369- 372. In: Stebbins, G. L. and Taylor, D. W. ,eds., A Survey of the natural history of the south pacific border region, California- -Biotic themes. Prepared for the National Park Service, U. S. Dept. of Interior, Washington, D.C. Holland, R. F. 1986. Preliminary description of the ter- restrial natural communities of California. Sacramento, Calif.: State of California, The Resources Agency, De- partment of Fish and Game. 156 p., mimeo. Kirkpatrick, J. B. and C. F. Hutchinson. 1977. The community composition of California coastal sage scrub. Vegetation 35:21-33. Michael Brandman Associates, Inc. 1986. Final subse- quent environmental impact report: Day Creek land and gravel mining operation and reclamation plan. San Bernardino County, Environmental Public Works Agency. San Bernardino, Calif. Michael Brandman Associates, Inc. 1987. Church Street sand and gravel mining environmental assessment. Pre- pared for C. L. Pharris Sand and Gravel, Inc., Highland, Calif. Michael Brandman Associates, Inc. 1988. Preliminary draft report, Biological Resources Assessment for Raiders Sta- dium Project, environmental impact statement/ report. Prepared for Lockman and Associates, Monterey Park, Cal. and Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers, Los Angeles District. Los Angeles, Calif. Mooney, H. A. 1988. Southern coastal scrub. In: M. G. Barbour and J. Major, eds., Terrestrial vegetation of California. California Native Plant Society, Special Publication No. 9. Sacramento, Calif. 471-489p. Smith, R. L. 1980. Alluvial scrub vegetation of the San Gabriel River floodplain, California. Madrono 27:126-138. State of California. 1988. 1987 Annual report of the status of California's state listed threatened and endangered plants and animals. The Resources Agency, Dept. of Fish and Game, Sacramento, Calif. 109 pp. mimeo. USFWS. 1980. Ecological services manual - 101 ESM - habitat as a basis for environmental assessment. Division of Ecological Services, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Dept. of Interior, Washington, D.C. Westman, W. E. 1981a. Factors influencing the distribution of species of California coastal sage scrub. Ecology 62(2)L:439-455. Westman, W. E. 1981b. Diversity relations and succession in California coastal sage scrub. Ecology 62(1):170-184. USDA Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-110. 1989. 193 P756 L C A I LSA ASSOCIATES INC J ISGO IOWA AVENUE SUITE 200 RIVERSIDE CALIFORNIA 92507 February 26, 2015 BERKELEY IRVINE 931 761 9710 TEL CARLSBAD PALM SPRINGS ROCKLIN 951 791 4277 FAX FRESNO PT RICIIAIOND SAN LUIS OBISPO Mr. Walt Mitchell, VP Retail Project Development Lewis Retail Centers 1156 N. Mountain Avenue Upland, California 91786 Subject: Results of Biological Resources Assessment Survey for the Day Creek -Base Line Retail Development Project in the City of Rancho Cucamonga (LSA Project No. LEW 1402) Dear Mr. Mitchell: LSA Associates, Inc. (LSA) is pleased to present this letter report summarizing the results of a general biological resources assessment for the proposed Day Creek -Base Line Retail Development Project. The proposed project site is approximately 15 acres in size (Assessor's Parcel Numbers [APNs] 108-903-115, 108-903-116, 108-903-135 and a partial piece of 108-903-114) located at the northwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California. More specifically, the site is within Section 32, Township 1 North, Range 6 West, as shown on the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Grrasti, California 7.5 -minute quadrangle (attached Figure 1). The project proposes the development of approximately 90,187 square feet of retail uses including supermarket, drug store, and other outlying retail pads (attached Figure 2). METHODS A literature review was conducted to determine the existence or potential occurrence of sensitive plant and animal species on or in the vicinity of the project site. Database records for the Cucamonga, California and Grrasti, California USGS 7.5 -minute quadrangles were searched on December 16, 2014, using the California Department of Fish and Wildlife's (CDFW) Natural Diversity Data Base application Rarefind 5 (version December 2, 2014, CDFW, NDDB) and the California Native Plant Society's Electronic Imventmy of Rare and Endangered Vascular Plants of California (online edition, CNPS, v8-02, http://www.cnps.orglinventory). Aerial photographs (Google 2014) were reviewed, and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) listed species and designated critical habitat information was used to determine the locations of any listed species sightings and critical habitat boundaries on and in the vicinity of the project site. The general biological resources survey included two site visits by LSA Biologists Claudia Bauer and Sarah Barrera. The first visit was conducted on December 23, 2014, between the hours 11:00 and 12:45 p.m. Weather conditions were sunny, warm, and windy during the site visit, with a recorded temperature of 81 ° Fahrenheit. Winds were brisk at approximately 8 to 10 miles per hour. The second site visit was conducted on February 16, 2015, between the hours of 4:10 and 4:45pm. Weather conditions were sunny and warm, with a slight breeze. The recorded temperature was 75' Fahrenheit. (2!27/.015) RALEW 14021aiol io Resource Lew 2-26-2015 cdiled LCII final docx PLAN ING 1 EK%IRONIIENTAL ScIENc ES 1 DESIGN P757 L S % \SS 11 C1 %I LS. 1\( Observations regarding general site conditions, vegetation, potential jurisdictional waters, and suitability of habitat for special status plants, wildlife, and other biological resources present were recorded. Soil types were determined using the WebSoil Survey (USDA/NRCS, http://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov). All plant and animal species observed during the field survey were noted. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Elevation, Topography, and Soils The proposed project site is an undeveloped vacant parcel bordered by Day Creek Boulevard and the Day Creek Fire Station to the east, single-family residences and the Rails to Trails multi -use trail to the north, Base Line Road and open undeveloped space to the south, and a fenced equipment/truck yard to the west. The site elevation is approximately 1,320 feet above mean sea level (amsl). The site is generally flat and level, however the topography of the project area is slightly sloped to the south. A drainage feature is present on the southeasterly portion of the site, and originates from an on-site 24 -inch diameter concrete culvert near Firehouse Court. Mapped soils on the site are Tujunga gravelly loamy sand, 0 to 9 percent slopes and Tujunga loamy sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes (WebSoil Survey). Soils observed on the site appeared consistent with this designation and have a gravely soil substrate, that is punctuated with rock and cobble. The site historically was located within an alluvial fan and the soils on site are remnant of this association with the alluvial fan (attached Figure 3). Attached Figure 4 depicts site conditions. Vegetation and Land Cover Total vegetation cover on the project site is approximately 70 percent and is moderately to highly disturbed. The vegetation consists of two communities: Riversidean Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub (RAFSS)(Prelinrinaiy descriptions of the terrestrial natural communities of California, Holland, R. 1986) and ruderal vegetation. The majority of the RAFSS vegetation onsite is dominated by hairy yerba santa (Eriodictyon trichocalyx). Other co -dominant plants include scalebroom (Lepidospartnm sgnantanmi) and chamise (Adenostoma fasciculatuni). Lemonadeberry (Rbits integrifolia), mountain mahogany (Cercocaipus betuloides), and Mexican elderberry (Sambucus mexicana) were also found on site. The RAFSS found in the northeastern portion of the project site adjacent to the fire station is dominated by California buckwheat (Eriogonuni fasciculatunn) and California sagebrush (Artemisia californica). Other co -dominant plants in this area of the project site include wedgeleaf ceanothus (Ceanothus cimeatns), deerweed (Acmispon glaber) and chamise. Shortpod mustard (Hirsclifeldia incana), telegraph weed (Heterotheca grandl/lora), fiddleneck (Anisinckia nienziesii), yellow star - thistle (Centaurea solstitialis), and other weedy, ruderal species are dominant along the site perimeter where the site has been most disturbed. A mature canyon live oak (Quercits chrysolepis) is found onsite, just west of Firehouse Court. A complete list of plant species observed is attached as Appendix A. Wildlife Wildlife species observed during the field surveys include Say's phoebe (Sayornis saya), wrentit (Chaniaea fasciata), American kestrel (Falco span er-ius), mourning dove (Zenaida macroura), (2!27115) RALEW Id021aio1aio Rcsources Leon 2-26.2015 Witcd LCH finatdcex 2 P758 15% %SS0(1 %ILS. 1\l common raven (Corvus corax), lesser goldfinch (Carduelis psaltria) and California towhee (Melo=one crissalis). Common side -blotched lizards (Urn stausburiana) were also observed. Potential Jurisdictional Waters and Streambeds The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), under Section 404 of the Federal Clean Water Act (CWA), regulates discharges of dredged or fill material into "waters of the United States." These waters include wetlands and non -wetland bodies of water that meet specific criteria, including a connection to interstate commerce. This connection may be direct (through a tributary system linking a stream channel with traditional navigable waters used in interstate or foreign commerce) or it may be indirect (through a connection identified in USACE regulations). The USACE typically regulates as non -wetland waters of the U.S. any body of water displaying an "ordinary high water mark" (OHWM). In order to be considered a "jurisdictional wetland" under Section 404, an area must possess hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils, and wctland hydrology. The CDFW, under Sections 1600 et seq. of the California Fish and Game Code, regulates alterations to lakes, rivers, and streams. A stream is defined by the presence of a channel bed and banks and at least an occasional flow of water. The Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) is responsible for the administration of Section 401 of the CWA, through water quality certification of any activity that may result in a discharge to jurisdictional waters of the U.S. The RWQCB may also regulate discharges to "waters of the Stale," including wetlands, under the California Porter -Cologne Water Quality Control Act. An isolated ephemeral drainage feature exists on the site. It originates at a 24 -inch diameter concrete culvert approximately 6 feet south of the sidewalk on the west end of Firehouse Court. Roadside runoff from Firehouse Court enters a curbside storm drain that diverts flow onto the project site via the 24 -inch diameter concrete culvert. The roadside runoff draining onto the site eventually sheet flows onto the southeasterly portion of the site. The flows do not leave the site, and do not connect to any downstream waters. The subject drainage feature is considered to be a drainage ditch created by roadside runoff. This type of drainage ditch is generally not considered jurisdictional under the CWA because it excavated in and drains only uplands, and does not carry a relatively permanent flow of water. Additionally, this drainage feature does not contain CDFW riparian habitat and is not considered a natural waterway regulated by CDFW. Therefores, it is LSA's opinion that this drainage would not be subject to the regulatory authority of the USACE under Section 404 of the CWA, the CDFW under Section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code, and the RWQB under Section 401 of the CWA. Threatened and Endangered Species Under provisions of Section 7(a)(2) of the Federal Endangered Species Act (FESA), a Federal agency that permits, licenses, funds, or otherwise authorizes a project activity must consult with the USFWS to ensure that its actions would not jeopardize the continued existence of any listed threatened or endangered species or destroy or adversely modify critical habitat. The USFWS designates as threatened or endangered, species that are at risk of extinction and may also adopt recovery plans that identify specific areas that are essential to the conservation of a listed species. Critical habitat areas that may require special management considerations or protections can also be designated. (2-17. 15) R LEW1402Mio1aio Resources Letter_? 26 2015 edited LCN final docs P759 LS% ASSOI I% VES. IV(. The California Endangered Species Act (CESA) is administered by the CDFW and prohibits the "Take" of plant and animal species identified as either threatened or endangered in the State of California by the Fish and Game Commission (Fish and Game Code Section 2050 to 2097). "Take" is defined as hunt, pursue, catch, capture, or kill. Sections 2091 and 2081 of the CESA allow the CDFW to authorize exceptions to the prohibition of "Take" of the State -listed threatened or endangered plant and animal species for purposes such as public and private development. The CDFW requires formal consultation to ensure that a proposed project's actions would not jeopardize the continued existence of any listed species or destroy or adversely affect listed species' habitats. Listed below are the Federal and/or State listed species and critical habitats reported to been found within a 1.5 -mile radius of the project vicinity: • Coastal California gnatcatcher (Polioptila califaa7dica californica; federally listed as threatened); and • San Bernardino kangaroo rat (Dipodomys nterriandi pail -its) and its Final Critical Habitat.' Coastal California Gnatcatcher. The alluvial fan sage scrub in the study area provides low quality habitat for the California gnatcatcher. Focused surveys for the California gnatcatcher are required to determine its presence or absence and any potential project effects to this species. Tile focused survey period during breeding season for the California gnatcatcher is March 15 through June 30 with a minimum of six site visits. Nonbreeding season surveys are conducted from July l through March 14, with a minimum of nine site visits. LSA recommends surveys during the spring breeding season for cost efficiency purposes. San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat. The project site is considered unsuitable habitat for the San Bernardino kangaroo rat (SBKR). The SBKR inhabits alluvial fan sage scrub habitats with gravelly and sandy soils of alluvial fans, braided river channels, active channels and terraces. Although alluvial fan scrub is present, it is disturbed by surrounding development and is isolated from larger blocks of RAFSS habitat. Because the site is isolated, there is no longer active soil transport on the site. Therefore, the site is not considered suitable habitat for the SBKR In addition, the project site does not occur within SBKR designated critical habitat, which occurs approximately 1.5 miles to the north of the project site and across State Route 210. Thus, the proposed project will have no effects to SBKR and its critical habitat. Other Special Interest Species The CDFW, USFWS, local agencies, and special interest groups, such as the CNPS, maintain lists of species that they consider to be in need of monitoring. Legal protection for these special interest species varies widely. Special interest species known to occur in the region are listed below. • Coast horned lizard (Pluynosonia blainvillii; California Species of Special Concem' [CSC]); • Northwestern San Diego pocket mouse (Chaetodipus fallav fallar; CSC); ' Designation of Critical Habitat for the San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat (Dipodomys nlerrimni pan•us); Department of the Interior, U.S. Fish and wildlife Service; Final Rule: 73 FR 61936 62002; October 2008. Refers to species with vulnerable or seriously declining populations (2!!7115) R ALEW I a02\Bio\Bio Resources Letter 2-26.2015 edited LCH final docx 4 P760 L5\ 1SSU(1%jib, IVC • San Diego desert woodrat (Neotonla lepicla intermedia; CSC); • Parry's spineflower (Chorizanthe partyi var. pai7yi; CNPS California Rare Plant Rank (CRPR) status 1 B);1 and • Mesa horkelia (Horkelia cwreata var. puberula; CNPS status IB). There is a low likelihood of these species occurring within the project site due to the habitat conditions on the site. Additionally, the species have a limited population distribution in southern California, and development is reducing their ranges and numbers further. These species have no official State or federal protection status but require consideration under CEQA. Due to the small size of the proposed project site, existing disturbances, and proximity to surrounding development, impacts to these sensitive species are not considered significant. No other special interest species are expected to occur within the project site. Migratory Bird Treaty Act Nesting bird species are protected by California Fish and Game Code Sections 3503 and 3503.5, and by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) of 1918 (16 USC 703-711). These laws make it unlawful to take, possess, or needlessly destroy the nest or eggs of any migratory bird or bird of prey. Trees and shrubs on the project site may provide nesting habitat for birds observed using the site as well as other birds known from the region. It is recommended that vegetation clearing activities be scheduled outside of the avian nesting season (February I through August 31). If construction activities are planned during the avian nesting season, a pre -construction nesting bird survey should be conducted within 30 days prior to commencement to avoid impacts to birds protected under the Fish and Game Code and MBTA. Natural Communities of Interest The RAFSS is a CNDDB designated special -status plant community. Because this habitat is disturbed and isolated from larger block of habitat, the loss of 10 acres of RSS is not considered substantial. Adopted Habitat Conservation Plan The project site does not lie within an area covered by any adopted Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP). Local Policies and Ordinances Protecting Biological Resources City and County General Plans and development ordinances may include regulations or policies governing biological resources. For example, policies may include tree preservation, locally designated species survey areas, local species of interest, and significant ecological areas. I CRPR Status I B Plants considered by CNPS to be rare, threatened, or endangered In California and elsewhere. (221- IS) R:•LEW1402\1]108io Resources Letter -2-26-2015 ediled LCII 6nal.docx P761 ts% %ssocitres.isc. The City of Rancho Cucamonga would consider the canyon live oak located onsite to be a Heritage Tree (refer to Figure 3). The Heritage Tree designation is determined by various factors. The canyon live oak qualifies for the distinction because it is in "excess of 30 feet in height and has a single trunk diameter at breast height (DBH) of 20 inches or more as measured 41/3 feet from ground level." (City of Rancho Cucamonga Code 1980, § 17.16.080; Ord. No. 855, § 4 (attach. 1), 8-1-2012; Ord. No. 858, § 4 (attach. 1), 1-16-2013; Ord. No. 860, § 4 (attach. 1), 6-19-2013.) It is LSA understanding the canyon live oak will remain in place. Contractors working near preserved trees will need to refer to the municipal code section pertaining to the Protection of Existing Trees for specific guidelines for working adjacent to preserved trees (Code 1980, § 17.80.050; Ord. No. 855, § 4 (attach. 1), 8-1-2012). RECOMMENDATIONS The following actions are recommended in order to avoid unauthorized impacts to biological resources as a result of the proposed project: • If vegetation clearing/initial ground -disturbing activities are planned during the avian nesting season (approximately February 1 through August 31), nesting bird surveys shall be conducted 30 days prior to vegetation clearing to ensure birds protected under California Fish and Game Code and the MBTA are not affected by construction -related activities. • The alluvial fan sage scrub on the project site provides potentially suitable habitat for the California gnatcatcher. Focused surveys for the California gnatcatcher would be required to determine its presence or absence and any potential project effects to this species. The focused survey period during breeding season for the California gnatcatcher is March 15 through June 30 with a minimum of six site visits. Nonbreeding season surveys are conducted from July 1 through March 14, with a minimum of nine site visits. LSA recommends surveys during the spring breeding season for cost efficiency purposes. Sincerely, LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. Claudia uer Senior Biologist Attachments: Appendix A: Plants and Animals Species Observed Onsite Figure 1: Regional and Project Location Figure 2: Project Location and Photograph Key Map Figure 3: Vegetation and Soils Figure 4: Site Photographs (2127115) VIEW Resources Leger 2.26.2015 edited LCII final doc% P762 I%% % ss o c I%I' E s. I st Appendix A: List of Plant and Wildlife Species Observed Scientific Name Common Name MAGNOLIOPI YTA: MAGNOLIOPSIDA DICOT FLOWERING PLANTS Adoxacese Moschatel family Sambucus me-vicana Mexican elderberry Anacardiaceac Sumac family Rhus integrifolia Lemonadeberry Rhus trilobata Skunkbush Toxicodendron diversilobuin Poison oak Asteraceac Sunflower family Artemisia californica California sagebrush Baccharis salicifolia Mule fat Centaurea solstitialis Yellow star -thistle Ericameria pinifolia Prnebush Heterotheca grandiora Telegraph weed Lacruca serriola Prickly lettuce Lepidospartmtt squamatum Scalebroom Apiacene Parsley family Apium gramolens Common celery Boraginacese Borage family AnrsincAia men.iesii Common fiddlcneck Cryptantha sp. Cryptantha Eriodictyon califonricunr Yerba santa Eucrypta chrysmrthemifolia Common eucrypta Pectocarya linearis Sagebrush combseed Brassicaceae Mustard family Hirschfeldia incaua (non-native species) Shortpod mustard Cactnceae Cactus family Cylindroprmtia californica var. parkeri Valley cholla Opuntia sp. Beavertail Chenopodiaceae Saltbush family Salsola tragus (non-native species) Russian thistle Cucurbitaceae Gourd family Afarah macrocarpus Cucamonga manroot Euphorbiaceae Spurge family Croton californicus California Croton Croton sedgents Dove weed Euplrorbia peplos Petty spurge Ricinus corrtmtr ds (non-native species) Castor bean (2.27:15) R. SLEW I 402\BIo1Bio Resources Leder 2-2&2015 ediled LCI I final.docx A- I P763 IN% OSo<11TIN, I,(. Appendix A: List of Plant and Wildlife Species Observed Scientific Name Common Name Fabaceae Pea family Acniispon glaber Deerweed Astragalus didvmocarpus Dwarf white milk vetch Astragahis pomonensis Pomona locoweed Fagaceae Beeches and Oaks family Quercus chrysolepis Canyon live oak Lamiacese Mint family Salvia apiana White sage hlamibitmm vulgare (non-native species) Horehound Polygonacene Buckwheat family Eriogomrnl fasciculatum California buckwheat Rimier hymenosepaltts Wild rhubarb Onagraceae Evening primrose family Carnissoldopsis sp. Sunup Rhamnaceac Buckthorn Family Rhamnus crocea Redberry Rosaceae Rose family Adenostoma fasciculation Chamise Cercocarplts betuloides Mountain mahogany Priants ilicifolia Holly leaved cherry Urticaceae Nettie family Urtica ureas Dwarf stinging nettle MAGNOLIOPHYTA: LILIOPSIDA MONOCOT FLOWERING PLANTS Agavaceae Agave family Hesperoyucca whipplei Chaparral yucca REPTILIA REPTILES Phrynosomatidae Phrynosomatid Lizards Uia stansburiana Common side -blotched lizard AVES BIRDS Columbidae Pigeons and Doves Zenaida macroura Mourning dove Corvidne Crows and Ravens Conus corar Common raven (2/27115) R'1LEW1402\Bio\nio Resources Lcua 2-:6-2015 edited LCH final.docx A-2 P764 I q % %SSM I ITE S. I%( Appendix A: List of Plant and Wildlife Saccies Observed Scientific Name Common Name EmberizIdne Emberizines hfelo:one crissalis California towhee Falconidae Falcons Falcosparnetins Amercian kestrel Fringillidne Finches Spin►►s psalitia Lesser goldfinch Sylviidae Old World Warblers Cha►naea fasciata Wrentit Tyrannldae Tyrant Flycatchers Sayonds soya Say's phoebe 0M IS) R' LEW 14021BIo1Blo Resources Letter_2-26•2015 edited LCII firul.docx A-3 P765 N Dav Cree&Baseline Retail Development Project 0 1,000 2.000 Biological Resources Assessment FEET SOURCE: USGS 7.5 Quads: Cucamonga Pc k (1988). Guasti (1981) CA,'ntonus Bros.. 2009 Regional and Project Location I -%LE W Ia021ReponslBiolrtg I _RegLoc.mad (2. 13t'.01S) 1W I ^. .."ti�`� � :•yti•'�'..,afr'i..srJ'�r.r7-•..fir :.,� �.J7 1'.� ;i.,'"i`�6gep„'�o: :�' Y �.y *j �.�y � - 'r•- _•' .ysw e. �r .. -�--'4i�tae'�.5:-.:��••aA r 1 1���• �-•-aj - . 'I � L �� �:•. , .. � � ^ k �+ � +=i::.1 -iiia j`p5 r H�1 1' 1� • 1 f,� �' �tGl F � �ry �- �� til s. - Ilei %�..r'";. �` +'2�, � •yttl `o� �'� � �� _ :�,:` ��• ,�. � � �;!s; ` iIVP�' �''�p" {:� X11 �' �z 4 -p "Y Y U,r..RT '.:t-,1� sir S 1*=•:: L, 1 . , `` "�Gp� ti. Awl Lsf R � i o ��•-�, - � . \ • hr- _ yam'" U S �.e•+� �`v '�: y tis,' T � t � jt �•� l� ' I Vii._ LYr ` t a ti,�r +i FII i l��. � • � 4 •�. e.i;i _' � C � ' � 4 a 4 •.icy Y�rr I: r. ari 4Lu. .. , N•T• ��.�� 7.t 17 r`F.- �� ;�,i: •.!. i w,..r- :'y.:� "__..,-=rr:C'riga`�•.w�'.T;'^#'��'a`�'.4.i�.7?i'67 .i4 ipy _ �.�_ 'tQ'T Wit, ._.^• -� w '� .Tri- _ •.. tMl r � - �S�.St _ J--*'�w 4�'�+�'-' r��'� eye - :t Y•• 1,� _ 'jl J L F� BASELINE :._:"L3�'Y.'� ���� ��_ $"cat.�r`--^�"•.atic ��`»-�.� - -fir _ _..._ �:.L`•w..w�` IA.'���..s••� �•r .� r . 'S;cr`- .! "r?] •.. iii f,r�^, ; fir'- _ •.iS •• «.�_';� .:1Tr m fin T 3' my xze✓%t 1L i7M7� I '• ' �'r atm '•.rM':i • +. �_ rq r � r fir, M � °•-.. _It ],�„�; ��''�rg •, ��- �,_ � C`t� 24 R , ' :ry •� � .S.r. b � �• � %+r; ra' ♦�7 : 1�F ''tom Y'� n+tI i*2 i:F ^jn 1. ^+,�,x�_. 4 ry • _, r �.•G��'�i�:::�!���,'�`,1�7;�i;�T^�J�,,,kck3bA'r i�n���}µ�+� �[ ' j�•1rs ..Y°I ,• •' + •._`n ` ""� ,�' C �r.���.. ,a. Lr �.: +� � I" -`V 1' ,ttti�U, t "r ? �r�' � _•fir:'::.."_.ra _._ ._ _•—__ �. -_�' TI?:� • .�ic�•�'�c :L_�c._ ct.'r".s^�•-......r: �_._.^J�.. -3! nA .:s -'.'':T. w I PHOTOGRAPH 9: Vieto focingnoriheaaf. PHOTOGRAPH 10:Vewfacingnorfhwesi. LSA I LEW1402 Repnru\Uin Gg4—SaePhnrno.cdr(02/IXQMS) P770 FIGURE 4C Dav Creek/Baseline Retail Development Project Biological Resources Assessment Site Photographs No Safe Arbor in the City - Iatimes COs Angeles dimes i ARTICLECOUZMONS Bark bi tnigm•d :\rtid Page 1 of 3 P771 The Nation I COLUMN ONE No Safe Arbor in the City Trees are disappearing from urban areus. Alost people don't realire the significance t1f'the loss• but one ratan is fighting /in• o place in tate shade. March 08, 2004 1 John Balzar I Times Staff Writer Eric Oldar doesn't have to go far to find the alarming evidence. He lifts his sizable 6400t-5 frame out of his office chair, walks 20 paces to the door, steps outside and glumly eyes the culprit: a spindly crape myrtle tree. A whole row of them bordering the Riverside parking lot. Actually, crape myrtles aren't trees. They are shrubs that grow to look something like trees in miniature. And that, in short, is the problem. That is what puts a knot in Oldar's jaw and leaves him muttering: "People want quality lives and communities -- they say so. But subtly, all around them, they're losing one of the essentials." Our grand city trees are disappearing. The towering trees that provide us cooling shade and save on air conditioning; the trees that give roost to birds; the broad -shouldered trees that soak up the heavy rains before they gather into floodwaters; the trees that cleanse our air and muffle the roar of metropolitan life; the great trees that inspire the poet in our battered urban hearts; the trees that soften the sharp corners of crowded living and connect us to the majesty of nature — the trees are going away. In their place: pygmy stands of crape myrtles, or clumps of even smaller bushes. Or just beds of redwood chips scattered atop plastic sheeting to make sure that even weeds don't grow. "We're eliminating trees," says Oldar with a deep sigh. "We're letting them become trivialized; without really paying attention, we're letting them disappear." Oldar is a forester and a pioneer in California's tiny urban forestry program, which is tucked away with firefighters in the state Department of Forestry. He has devoted most of his 27 -year career to promoting urban forests, a concept that makes all the sense in the world if we think about it, which, let's agree, not many of us do. How many of us were even aware that Sunday was Arbor Day in California, the day for celebrating and planting trees? In our mind's eye, if not in reality, cities of the United States are made glorious by their trees, and always have been. In the imagination of entrepreneurs, the city groves are a vast, untapped and profitable stock of spectacular hardwoods and softwoods for furniture, floors and home architectural details. In truth, though, our cities are turning from green into gray-- at an alarming rate and with surprisingly costly consequences: • According to American Forests, the nation's oldest citizen conservation organization and self-proclaimed "voice of the trees," the nation's urban areas as defined by the Census Bureau have lost 21% of their tree cover in the last decade. Viewed over longer time spans, the news is even worse. For instance, Washington, a city renowned for its blossoming cherry trees, has sacrificed 6o% of its heavy tree canopy in the last generation. Even before the recent wildfires, San Diego and surrounding communities had lost 27% of their green canopy in less than 20 years. In an extensive study using satellite imagery, scientists at American Forests calculated that the trend, if unchecked, could cost taxpayers $164 million to manage future storm -water runoff. Added pollution that trees would otherwise absorb could make it more difficult for the region to attain clean -air standards. • A joint study by state and federal forestry agencies determined that California cities have about 177 million trees and 242 million empty planting sites. The potential savings is huge. Three good trees planted around your house can reduce air-conditioning costs 20% or more. In a project sponsored by NASA, meteorologists determined that clearing trees had made temperatures in Atlanta 5 to 8 degrees higher than in outlying areas. This has created an urban "heat island" that generates increasingly violent thunderstorms over the city and its suburbs, contributing to flooding. • And the topper: Incalculable millions are spent to process valuable tons of trees as common garbage. According to studies by the U.S. Forest Service and the International Society of Arboriculture, more potentially usable wood fiber is produced in urban areas each year than is harvested from U.S. national forests — much of it sent into an already overburdened waste stream. The numbers grow mind -numbing. Potential energy savings run into the billions of dollars if we would only shade ourselves under more trees — $3.6 billion annually in California alone, according to a study by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. The savings from needless flood control is even greater. And global warming? Trees sequester epic amounts of carbon, which is the culprit in making our atmosphere a heat -trapping greenhouse. In other words, it's not just the size of the car we drive but the number of trees we plant that may shape tomorrow's weather. To visit Oldar's cluttered, 10 -by -12 office near the 91 Freeway is to tumble down a rabbit hole. The simple logic behind trees in our cities is inarguable; so too are the mindless forces that work against them. That makes Oldar a man of divided spirits. What other do-gooder state bureaucrat can so easily describe a painless, profitable, easily grasped solution for a broad civic problem? This is not poverty or racial prejudice or traffic congestion — troubles that seem to defy our capacity to envision workable solutions. Here, we can all save money and make daily life quieter, more beautiful, indeed more natural, for hardly any, effort at all. Oldar's round face seems to light up. He is an unstoppable optimist. http://arti cl es.l ati mes.com/pri nt/2004/mar/08/entertai nment/et-trees8 11/9/2015 No Safe Arbor in the City - Iatimes Page of 3 P772 More than 8o years ago, Helen Hoyt put it this way in her poem "Ellis Park": I take your trees, And your breeze, Your greenness, Your cleanness, Some of your shade, some of your sky, Some of your calm as I go by.... But then Oldar outlines the maddening obstacles in the path of shady, greener cities — all of them described in reports, .ideos, pamphlets, satellite photos and books that he piles up in a truly scary -large stack almost as high as his desk. Most of these documents contain some version of the old buck -passing excuse: I don't know, I don't care, it's not my responsibility. Oldar sags in his chair with an expression of impossibility on his face, a born-again pessimist. For what it's worth, California is a national leader in the campaign to save city trees. The state's 1978 law on the subject says this: "Trees serve as a vital resource in the urban environment and as an important psychological link with nature for the urban dweller. Trees are a valuable economic asset ... play an important role in energy conservation ... reduce air pollution ... increase property values ... attract business...." And so forth. Here and there — and it's pretty obvious where: Beverly Bills, San Marino, Claremont to name three — individual communities continue to promote and protect their tree -stapes. Other municipalities are awakening. San Diego has undertaken a 20 -year replanting program. In the last few years, the city of Los Angeles has begun planting more curbside trees than it cuts down, and just last week announced that a s1 -million federal -state transportation grant would be used to plant 3,500 more trees — utilizing crape myrtles only when planting space demands it. "We're planting trees greater than 40 feet whenever possible. It is extremely important for our environment to have a healthy urban forest of large -canopy trees," says Melinda Bartlett of the Los Angeles Environmental Affairs Department. Elsewhere, though, trees tend to occupy far lower rungs of the municipal priority list, notwithstanding common sense or the law. In Oldar's idealized vision of California's future, the challenge is not quite as simple as planting trees. But almost. It must be the right tree in the proper place — no single -species urban forest monocultures that are prone to attacks like Dutch elm disease or the insect assault that has killed 30,000 eucalyptus trees in Los Angeles in the last 18 months. Plantings need to be spaced out so that entire neighborhoods of trees don't reach maturity and begin to die off at once, as is happening now in post -World War II subdivisions. Municipal leaders and those higher up the governmental organizational chain must update master plans and ordinances to recognize the manifold value of trees, Oldar continues. Governments need to jump-start the budding enterprise of utilizing — and bringing to market — the wondrous woods produced by urban trees as they reach maturity and need to be replaced. One example: Acacia trees by the hundreds, or even thousands, are chopped up and dispatched to California landfills at who -knows -what expense to municipal governments. It is not that different from city councils' hiring crews to "dispose" of underground oil reserves by pumping them into sewers. In Hawaii, by contrast, the sister tree to California's acacia is the imperiled koa, whose wood, increasingly rare, fetches from $17.50 to $50 per board foot, which is a chunk of tree smaller than a breadboard, only 12 inches square and 1 inch thick. From a briefcase under his desk, Oldar produces samples of 35 other exotic and valuable woods that are common hereabouts and now burdening landfills instead of being used for furniture, home building or even for fuel to generate energy. Stephen M. Bratko%ich, a forester with the U.S. Forest Service in St. Paul, Minn., has drawn from published studies to calculate that cities produce about 3.8 billion board feet of usable logs each year due to natural mortality, disease, storm blow -downs and development — more wood than harvested from all of the country's 147 million acres of national forestlands. Much of it, probably most, is sent to landfills or turned into low -value products like wood chips. Bratkovich has calculated that if all these logs were sawed into 12 -inch -wide boards and laid end to end, they would make 12o round-trip paths from Los Angeles to New York. Hoping to turn the situation around in California, the state now grubstakes entrepreneurs to try their hand at salvaging urban woods. The state Department of Forestry and Fire Protection sponsors an annual four-day Urban Forestry Academy for municipal officials. The state helps support a vast website, www.ufei.org, that guides consumers and government officials in what kind of trees to plant and, potentially, where the resulting wood can be sold and purchased. Last autumn, the group American Forests urged every city to establish the goal of increasing its tree canopy by to%. Still, California remains headed down what Oldar calls "an insidious slope": Great shade trees are vanishing, leaving pygmy urban forests and gray -stapes. Why? Oldar rips into the topic with the zeal of a chainsaw: Municipal governments manage trees but have no incentive or requirement to promote energy conservation, storm -water management or pollution abatement. That's the chore of other agencies. On the other hand, local governments are required by law to reduce the volume of waste they send to landfills. They are charged with repairing sidewalks and curbs damaged by tree roots. As a consequence, trees have become a costly nuisance, not an asset to local officials. Who can blame them for the current trend to plant smaller shrubs, like the crape myrtle? As for the potential value of wasted lumber, cities consider this merely theoretical, if they consider it at all. The hidebound lumber distribution system in the U.S. is dominated by giant chain operations that have little interest in sundry lots of variety woods produced in urban forests. Meanwhile, developers, trying to maximize densities, also are planting bushes instead of trees. Ditto homeowners with a mind to expand their houses to the property lines. Thus, the crape myrtle, Lagerstroemia indica, is now the most popular tree in urban California — an idea that strikes Oldar like a thumb in the eye. http://arti cl es.I ati mes.com/pri nt/2004/mar/08/enterted nment/et-treesB 11/9/2015 No Safe Arbor in the City - Iatimes Page 3 of 3 P773 "I call them crap myrtles," he grumbles. "They have their place, but should we get carried away and say this is the only tree? What does that tell us about the future?" Standing outside his office, he surveys the skinny row of 12 -foot -tall myrtles. "See any signs of birds there? Anv nests?" He pivots 18o degrees and looks heavenward to the top of a shapely sycamore, where a large nest is silhouetted against the sky. In the summer, these trees would tell another important story — that the crape myrtles generate hardly enough shade to cover the bonnet of a compact car while one Ione sycamore shelters the forestry department offices all afternoon. Added up block by block, the consequences can be startling. In the various studies of tree cover in Atlanta, scientists measured the downtown air temperature at 86 degrees, while comparative surface temperatures were 85 to 90 degrees in the shade of trees and 127 to 129 in direct sun. In one seven -house development built by Atlanta's Habitat for Humanity, scientists determined that homeowners would save $951 in energy and $268 in storm drainage charges each year if adequate trees were planted and allowed to mature. Meanwhile, Oldar says, municipal and regional park departments are increasingly preoccupied with recreational developments — tennis courts, softball fields, recreation centers and the like, not trees. These days, even homeowners cannot be counted on to keep their neighborhoods green — and the truth is that private citizens shoulder much of the burden as urban foresters. In Los Angeles, the city government owns 1.5 million to 2 million trees, while businesses and homeowners are responsible for perhaps 10 million. And while many citizens are happy to tell pollsters all the virtues of tree -lined streets, in practice a good many favor trees everywhere but on their own property, worried about storm damage or tree roots clogging their pipes or squirrels tangling with their house cats or the mess of leaves in autumn. More and more, they turn over yardwork to gardeners who are untrained in tree care. "I have one of the few homes on my block with any substantial number of trees left," Oldar sadly concedes about his neighborhood in Ontario. In arid climates like Southern California, the fresh water necessary for all types of vegetation is increasingly part of the civic conversation, or should be. In this, trees generally fare well -- with many varieties requiring only about one-third the water of a lawn, and then, in turn, providing shade that conserves soil moisture for other plants. Asked to look ahead, Oldar, the father of two, remains a man divided. It is entirely plausible, he says, for a common-sense turnabout. Once Californians begin to recognize what is happening, it would take only reasonable effort to increase the shade -tree canopy to 25% or 30% of our residential landscape. "That's realistic, and that's what I'd like to see," he says. "What I fear is the mind -set of doing nothing, that people won't appreciate trees generally:" In that case, trees may wind up like covered bridges, a quaint part of America's past. Within a generation, perhaps only 6% of our cities will be shaded by trees — with the corresponding reduction in the quality of our lives. "That," Oldar says quietly, "is what I fear for my kids. They'll wake up in the future and wonder: Where did it all go?" r-05Angeles Uitles Copyright 2015 Los Angeles Times Index by Keyword I Index by Date I Privacy Policy I Terms of Service http://arti cl es.l ati mes.com/pri nt/2004/mar/08/entertai nment/et-trees8 11/9/2015 Agricultural Land Loss & Conservation Of California's approximately 100 million acres of land, 43 million acres are used for agriculture. Of this, 16 million acres are grazing land and 27 million acres are cropland. Only about 9 million acres of irrigated land (see illustration), or one-third of the state's cropland, are considered to be prime, unique or of statewide importance. About 3.4 million acres of land in California's agricultural counties are now urbanized. (Another 2 Important Farmland in California, 2002 , million acres are in areas that are, �',] IPRIW1ED iNi4W0 l so urbanized that there is no more t� 6bLN0lN Y•q NO D�l9M LNU agriculture.) Development is now Q LF9NNQ NJLiUPLAND QOt E9LNq consuming an average of about Q VAMP 40,000 acres of agricultural land L R StnIE NOL40EP LOV.t20lNA ll per year. One-sixth of the land W1 U V, .Tr i AR" urbanized since the Gold Rush," v 538,000 acres, has been developed since 1990. Of this, 28 percent or 152,000 acres of land, were prime, unique or statewide important farmland. In the San Joaquin Valley, which accounts for over half of California's total �. P774 agricultural output, more than 60 _ percent of all land developed was so a Y. prime, unique or of statewide �.:. importance. Less than 40 percent of all land in this region falls into these categories. The disproportionate consumption of the best farmland is occurring primarily because most California cities were located in areas with good soils and abundant water, and most development is now occurring on the immediate urban fringe. An exception to typical urban -edge development is the proliferation of very -large lot (5- 40 acre) rural residences that have the appearance of farms or ranches, but are not, and are unlikely ever to be, used for commercial agriculture. Statewide data do not exist on these "ranchettes," but in the San Joaquin Valley, the Farmland Mapping & Monitoring Program has documented 143,000 acres devoted to this use, accounting for 20 percent of all developed land in that region while housing a much smaller fraction of the population. The underlying causes of farmland loss in California are rapid population growth and the inefficient use of land. Since 1990, urban development has consumed an acre of land for every 9.4 people statewide. In the San Joaquin Valley, the rate was an acre for every 8 people. In contrast, recent development in Sacramento County, an acknowledged leader in efficient growth, accommodated 20 people per acre. 19 P775 Additional land has been removed from agriculture for environmental purposes, mainly the creation or enlargement of wildlife refuges and withdrawals due to water shortage. Between 2004 and 2006 alone, irrigated farmland declined by more than 200,000 acres statewide due to these and similar causes. Unless issues related to the impact of irrigation on the Delta are resolved, there is a significant risk much more farmland will be permanently lost to agriculture or, at least, to irrigated crop production. If current development trends continue, 1.3 million acres of California agricultural land, including 670,000 acres of prime, unique and statewide important farmland, will be developed by 2050. For irrigated cropland alone, this would entail an annual loss of an estimated $2 billion in agricultural production in current farm gate dollars. Only five counties in California now produce more than that. Though California agriculture has thus far prospered despite the loss of farmland, it remains to be seen whether this will continue. Between 1949 and 1989, agricultural productivity growth in California averaged 2.2 percent per year, while from 1990 to 2002 it slowed to 1.2 percent. Historic increases in agricultural productivity have been sustained largely by expanding water supplies, the increasing use of fossil energy and more sophisticated technology. All of these are now under mounting pressure because of scarcity, cost and public opposition, e.g., agrichemicals and GMOs, not to mention the uncertain impact of climate change. Have we reached a tipping point? Regardless, farmland lost is gone forever, and the continuing loss of the state's best land narrows the options and reduces the resilience of California agriculture. Some California farmland will continue to be lost to urban and other uses in the future. But more effective farmland retention and urban development policies could significantly reduce the loss. In the San Joaquin Valley, a recent study done for a regional planning process called the "Blueprint," found that increasing urban densities to 10 dwellings per acre — comparable to those in the more suburban areas of the state — could reduce farmland loss by 53 percent or 174,000 acres by 2050. California has a complicated fabric of policies that address the retention of farmland for agriculture. The closest thing the state has to an official policy is AB 857 (2003), which established farmland retention as one of three state planning priorities. (Another priority, efficient urban development, would also conserve farmland.) This law requires state agencies to apply the policy and calls for an annual report by the Governor on their progress, but neither has occurred to date. The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) includes farmland loss as a significant impact that must be avoided or mitigated, and some mitigation has occurred, resulting in the preservation of several thousand acres of land under conservation easement. The California Farmland Conservancy Program (CFCP), administered by the Department of Conservation, has invested $62 million in the acquisition of conservation easements on 41,000 acres, leveraging its funds with $51 million in local, federal and private contributions. State funds have come from bond acts and Williamson Act cancellation fees. Since the inception of the CFCP, the state has spent about 17 cents per capita per year on agricultural conservation easements, well below national leaders like Maryland ($4 per capita per year to protect 336,000 acres) and Pennsylvania ($2.70 to protect 408,000). Private land trusts have also acquired 20 iAl:1 conservation easements over at least 200,000 acres of California agricultural land, most of it rangeland. The Williamson Act (1965) is perhaps the state's best-known farmland retention policy. It was intended to take development pressure off farmland by reducing property taxes in exchange for an annually -renewing 10 -year commitment not to develop the land. About 16.5 million acres of land are now enrolled in Williamson at an annual cost of just under $40 million in state subvention payments to local governments (plus an undetermined amount of foregone local property tax revenue). The efficacy of the law as a deterrent to farmland conversion is called into question by the pattern of enrollment, which tends to be very spotty around cities where land is most likely to be developed. Recently -enacted state climate legislation (AB 32 and SB 375) may also have a salutary effect on farmland conversion by encouraging more compact, efficient development that not only requires less auto use and, hence, produced fewer greenhouse gas emissions, but also consumes less land per capita. A considerable number of California counties and cities have farmland retention policies, often as part of their general plans. Most call for avoiding the best land and developing land more efficiently. As farmland conversion data show, however, these well- intentioned policies have been largely ineffective. Local governments seldom appear to apply them to actual development proposals or to measure their performance against their stated policies. On the other hand, a few local governments in California have very comprehensive and effective farmland conservation programs that are considered national models. Most notable among them are Marin, Sonoma, Napa, Ventura and Yolo Counties. In contrast, leading agricultural counties such as Fresno, Tulare and Monterey have been struggling to adopt and implement effective farmland conservation policies. Key issues for resolution: What level of farmland loss is acceptable — or what level of farmland conservation is necessary — to guarantee a land base that will sustain the California agriculture industry in the face of other pressures and uncertainties? Are state and local farmland conservation policies strong enough to limit the loss to this level? How can we measure our progress and, ultimately, success? — Edward Thompson, Jr., American Farmland Trust, July 2009 Sources: Alston, J., P. Pardey and J. James, Setting agricultural science strategy in tumultuous economic times, , California Agriculture 63(1):2-2. DOI: 10.3733/ca.v063nOIp2. January -March 2009, available at: http://ucanr.org/repository/CAO/landingpage.cfm?article=ca.v063n0l p2&fulltext=ves Farmland Mapping & Monitoring Program, California Department of Conservation, reports available at: littp:Hw%vw.conservation.ca. og v/dl[p/FMMP/Paees/Index.aspx Higgins, B., et al., Institute for Local Self -Government, Farmland Protection Action Guide: 24 Strategies for California, (2002), available at: http://water.lgc.org/resource- tools/Farmland%20Protection%20Action%20Gu ide.pdf 21 Kuminoff,N., A. Sokolow and D. Sumner, University of California Agriculture Issues Center, Farmland Conversion: Perceptions and Realities, AIC Issues Brief #16 (2001), available at: httD:Haic.ucdavis.edu/oa/briefl 6.od f P777 San Joaquin Valley Blueprint, Comparison of Performance Measures, available at: http://www.valleyblueprint.org/documents/Summit 09/summit.followun/scenario.performance.measures.p df Thompson, E., American Farmland Trust, The Future Is Now: Central valley Farmland at the Tipping Point? (2006), available at:littp:Hwxvw.farmland.ora/proerams/states/futureisnow/defauIt.= Thompson, E. American Farmland Trust, Paving Paradise: A Nein Perspective on California Farmland Conversion (2007), available at: www.farmland.org/california Watt, T. and E. Thompson, American Farmland Trust, Case Studies in Agricultural Land Preservation in California, (2006)(summary available on Ag Vision web site) 22 P778 Granger, Donald From: Henry Tran Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2017 6:12 To: Granger, Donald Subject: Re: Day Creek Square: Third and Final Community Meeting and Upcoming Planning Commission Meeting Dear Donald I am not sure if I am able to attend the meeting to night , I want to send you my concerns and suggestion for the Day Creek Square Project 1. Parking problems: I suggest that a detail report on the parking issue. a) The tandem parking in the resident highly will be converted to storage and the possible conversion of dens to bed room making the shortage the parking b) The shared parking between the commercial/business and residential which i snot like kind has to be properly studied. There haven't been many cases like this in reality. c) Highly possible parking problems to the immediate neighborhoods: Reality proved that even though with proper study the Strathmore community has the parking problems so bad that they had to build the gate. Unfortunately our community doesn't have space and resource for the gate. We want a clear solution for from the Developer and City if it happens to our communities. What would the City will do to resolve the problems 2. Safety : With the huge number of newly built Condos , very possible it is good opportunity for investors to buyer for rental properties. Reality shows that many foreign investors turn investment properties into a Airbnb business. The chance for criminals to rent them and commit crimes is very high. I suggest that Developer via the CC&R won't allow any transaction to investors at least in the first 5 years . This will partially keep the community mainly for primary resident buyers 3. Traffic on Baseline and Etiwanda is already bad during the drop off and pick up time for schools. In traffic created by the Day Creek Market Place will definitely worsen the problems not mention the additional number of care user of fututre residents of Day Creek Square. 4. Over load schools Based on the above mentioned problems , I suggest that the City request the Developer to have more detail study on parking, traffic problems. The obvious solution is to reduce the density by lower the number of the condo style residential units with more single family units or reserve 1 of the complexes of for sale the senior citizens. As senior mostly have 1 car, no kids, don't travel frequently Please submit my suggestion to the Planning Department and the City Council Your attention to our concerns is highly appreciated i enr W Tran Get your own [allihill sienatur,� On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 6:57 PM, Granger, Donald <Donald.Grangera,cityofrc.us> wrote: iAE:'. Granger, Donald From: Janice Elliott Sent: Thursday, Anif =01,2017"8:01P To: Granger, Donald Cc: Subject:' aMaMitigatfi!IMIDay Creek Square Dear Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commissioners and City Council Members, As an avid conservationist, I am writing you to share my concern that the 28.4 acres of Riversidian alluvial fan sage scrub habitat be mitigated to help preserve this rapidly diminishing natural resource. The plants and animals that inhabit this community will need to find other homes or they will perish, adding to the number of our diminishing native plants and animals. Please consider a park or walking area that prominently features samples of our local native plants to encourage an appreciation of our natural heritage per the 2010 Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. This could inspire people to incorporate these plants in their home gardens, thereby encouraging water conservation as well since these native plants are drought tolerant. Thank you for considering the preservation of our beautiful sage scrub plant communities. Janice Elliott Upland city council member P780 Granger, Donald From: Suzanne Thompson Sent: Saturday, June 03, 2017 5:09 AM To: Granger, Donald Subject: Day Creek Square Project Public Comments June 3, 2017 Donald Granger, Senior Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Dr. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department: I am not a Rancho resident, but live close by and frequently visit your city on shopping trips to Victoria Gardens, REI, or Living Spaces, dining at the Brio Tuscan Grill or the Sycamore Inn, shopping for Asian ingredients at the 99 Ranch Market, or a medical appointment at the Kaiser Medical Center. I especially enjoy exploring the wildlife and beauty of your North Etiwanda Preserve. The natural habitat and environmental quality of Rancho Cucamonga is important to me and enhances the appeal of your city. I was very disappointed to learn that development decisions are being made that compromise the remaining natural environment in Rancho. The proposed Day Creek Square project will permanently remove Riversidian alluvial fan sage scrub (RAFSS) from its 28.4 acre site. This RAFSS is considered by our state to be a sensitive and declining habitat that is home to a variety of native wildlife species including birds. As a result, I ask that the City of Rancho Cucamonga require DR Horton, the developer of this project, to mitigate for the loss of this RAFSS as per the conservation goals of the Rancho Cucamonga 2010 General Plan. An example of mitigation for the loss of RAFSS would be to require the Day Creek Square project to 1) include native alluvial fan sage scrub vegetation throughout its landscaping, and 2) extend the length of its proposed linear park to connect with the planned city bike path along the Day Creek Drainage. According to present plans, this 63 ft. wide parkway on the southern edge of the site will not extend to the far west edge of the project site. Such a connection between the linear park and future bike path should provide a corridor for wildlife between native habitat that still exists along Day Creek Drainage and native vegetation that may be included in the parkway. A more significant mitigation for the loss of this RAFSS habitat would be to require the developer to contribute to funds to help 1) restore alluvial fan sage scrub in present conservation areas, or 2) acquire proposed conservation areas that would protect alluvial fan sage scrub, or 3) do both. Present conservation areas include the North Etiwanda Preserve, and proposed conservation areas include those discussed in the Ranch Cucamonga 2010 General Plan. Thank you for considering the preservation of an invaluable plant and wildlife community. Sincerely, Suzanne Thompson P781 Granger, Donald From: Seth Thompso Sent: Saturday, June 03, 2017 9:37 AM To: Granger, Donald Subject: Importance of REAL Mitigation at Day Creek Square June 3, 2017 Donald Granger, Senior Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Dr. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department: I am not a Rancho resident, but live close by and frequently visit your city on shopping trips to Victoria Gardens, REI, or Living Spaces, dining at the Brio Tuscan Grill or the Sycamore Inn, shopping for Asian ingredients at the 99 Ranch Market, or a medical appointment at the Kaiser Medical Center. My family and I especially enjoy exploring the wildlife and beauty of your North Etiwanda Preserve. The natural habitat and environmental quality of Rancho Cucamonga is important to me and enhances the appeal of your city. I was very disappointed to learn that development decisions are being made that compromise the remaining natural environment in Rancho. The proposed Day Creek Square project will permanently remove Riversidian alluvial fan sage scrub (RAFSS) from its 28.4 acre site. This RAFSS is considered by our state to be a sensitive and declining habitat that is home to a variety of native wildlife species including birds. As a result, I ask that the City of Rancho Cucamonga require DR Horton, the developer of this project, to mitigate for the loss of this RAFSS as per the conservation goals of the Rancho Cucamonga 2010 General Plan. An example of mitigation for the loss of RAFSS would be to require the Day Creek Square project to 1) include native alluvial fan sage scrub vegetation throughout its landscaping, and 2) extend the length of its proposed linear park to connect with the planned city bike path along the Day Creek Drainage. According to present plans, this 63 ft. wide parkway on the southern edge of the site will not extend to the far west edge of the project site. Such a connection between the linear park and future bike path should provide a corridor for wildlife between native habitat that still exists along Day Creek Drainage and native vegetation that may be included in the parkway. A more significant mitigation for the loss of this RAFSS habitat would be to require the developer to contribute to funds to help 1) restore alluvial fan sage scrub in present conservation areas, or 2) acquire proposed conservation areas that would protect alluvial fan sage scrub, or 3) do both. Present conservation areas include the North Etiwanda Preserve, and proposed conservation areas include those discussed in the Ranch Cucamonga 2010 General Plan. Thank you for considering the preservation of an invaluable plant and wildlife community. Sincerely, P782 Granaer. Donald From: Nancy & Rich Kemerling Sent: Sunday, June 04, 2017 3:47 M To: Granger, Donald Subject: declining habitat June 4, 2017 Planning Department c/o Donald Granger, Senior Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Dr. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department: Even though I live in Riverside, I spend a lot of time in Rancho Cucamonga, visiting friends and shopping. I am disheartened to learn that the proposed Day Creek Square project will permanently remove Riversidian alluvial fan sage scrub (RAFSS) from its 28.4 acre site. This RAFSS is considered by our state to be a sensitive and declining habitat that is home to a variety of native wildlife species including birds, which are possibly as important to me as my grandchildren. As a result, I ask that the City of Rancho Cucamonga require DR Horton, the developer of this project, to mitigate for the loss of this RAFSS as per the conservation goals of the Rancho Cucamonga 2010 General Plan, which includes preserving "sensitive habitats" (Chapter 6, Page RC -7). An example of mitigation for the loss of RAFSS would be to require the Day Creek Square project to 1) include native alluvial fan sage scrub vegetation throughout its landscaping, and 2) extend the length of its proposed linear park to connect with the planned city bike path along the Day Creek Drainage. According to present plans, this 63 ft. wide parkway on the southern edge of the site will not extend to the far west edge of the project site. Such a connection between the linear park and future bike path should provide a corridor for wildlife, such as birds, between native habitat that still exists along Day Creek Drainage and any native vegetation that may be included in the parkway or other parts of the development. A more significant mitigation for the loss of this RAFSS habitat would be to require the developer to contribute to funds to help 1) restore alluvial fan sage scrub in present conservation areas, or 2) acquire proposed conservation areas that would protect alluvial fan sage scrub, or 3) do both. Present conservation areas include the North Etiwanda Preserve, and proposed conservation areas include those discussed in the Ranch Cucamonga 2010 General Plan (Chapter 6, Page RC -4). Thank you for considering the preservation of such an invaluable native plant community Sincerely, P783 MEMORANDUM GLENN LUKOS ASSOCIATES Regulatory Services PROJECT NUMBER: 0446 -93 -PIER TO: Donald Granger CC: Dan Boyd FROM: David Moskovitz ON DATE: May 25, 2017 SUBJECT: Review of Natasha Walton Letter — Day Creek Square Project, City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California. The purpose of this memorandum is to provide a general review of a comment letter prepared by Ms. Natasha Walton (dated April 11, 2017) for the Day Creek Square development project located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County. Ms. Walton describes herself as an Upland resident that frequents the City of Rancho Cucamonga, including hiking in the North Etiwanda Preserve. Ms. Walton is a wildlife biologist and adjunct biology professor at Chaffey College. Ms. Walton cites the City's 2010 General Plan, including the intent to "preserve significant visual resources, sensitive habitats, lands important for water resources, and recreational spaces". Ms. Walton provided a number of recommendations to the City for minimizing impacts from the Day Creek Square project. The following is a summary of those recommendations, along with my comments. Ms. Walton states that the project should create a mitigation plan to address impacts to Riversidian alluvial fan sage scrub (RAFSS); and that the City should require the project should preserve and/or restore RAFSS habitat within the project site, or elsewhere within the City, and that preservation/restoration should be comparable to the impact acreage. Ms. Walton also states that the project should incorporate RAFSS plant species into the project's landscape design, and referenced the Day Creek Market Place and Residential Project located north of Day Creek Square as an example. As stated in our Biological Technical Report for the Day Creek Square Project (dated April 21, 2017), the project site is dominated by California buckwheat scrub, which due to repeated disturbance of the site is remnant of RAFSS habitat that historically occupied the site. However, due to flood control activities with Day Creek, isolation of the site by development, and onsite disturbances, the current habitat does not have long-term conservation value as RAFSS, and the loss of vegetation at the site would not have a I C I9 Orchard Lake Forest California 92630-8300 lebl one; (949) 837-0404 Facsimile; (949) 837-5834 FXHIBIT P P784 MEMORANDUM May 25, 2017 Page 2 substantial adverse effect on remaining functional RAFSS associated with the Etiwanda Fan, Lytle Creek, Santa Ana River floodplain and elsewhere in the region. Therefore, the impacts would be less than significant and would not require mitigation. Ms. Walton's request for the project to incorporate native scrub species into the landscape plan would allow for a native plant component, but the inclusion of native species would not mitigate the loss of habitat. • Ms. Walton states that she visited the Day Creek Square site this spring, and noted animals "not normally found within highly urbanized areas", including desert cottontail (Sylvilagus audubonii) and side -blotched lizard, and "a variety of beautiful native birds and butterflies". Ms. Walton made this statement as commentary against impacting native habitats. However, the species referenced by Ms. Walton are not sensitive and do not require mitigation for the loss of habitat. • Ms. Walton acknowledges that the Day Creek Square project will include "native large - canopy trees" such as coast live -oak (Quercus agrifolia) and sycamore (Platanus racemosa), but noted that more "small canopy non-native trees" will be planted than "native large -canopy trees". Ms. Walton requests that the project include a greater proportion of native trees. The project is not impacting native trees, including oaks and sycamores, and so there is no requirement to plant native trees. As such, the inclusion of any native trees in the project's landscaping would be a beneficial project design feature, but there is no expectation to provide a minimum proportion of native trees relative to non-native trees. • Ms. Walton acknowledges that the City is requiring shielded lighting to minimize light pollution, but provides additional lighting recommendations to minimize glare. The project site is not located adjacent to a habitat conservation area. As such, there is no potential for indirect impacts to sensitive biological resources as a result of lighting, and therefore additional lighting modifications would not be required to mitigate impacts to biological resources. • Ms. Walton provides several comments/recommendations related to increasing open space and connectivity as it pertains to trails and park uses. However, the comments don't relate to biological resource impacts, but instead to public uses and aesthetics. As such, we don't have further comments as it pertains to this item. P785 MEMORANDUM May 25, 2017 Page 3 Ms. Walton recommends that the project include an organic garden, as she believes "in the importance of protecting land for agriculture since huge portions of our agricultural lands are being lost at an alarming rate due to urbanization". The project is not impacting agricultural lands, and therefore there is no requirement for the project to create features (such as a community garden) to offset the regional loss of agricultural lands not attributed to the project. If you have any questions regarding this memorandum, please contact me at (949) 837-0404, ext. 42, or at d.moskovitz(a),wetland permitting. m. p:0446-93b.mem.docx P786 MEMORANDUM GLENN LUKOS ASSOCIATES Regulatory Services PROJECT NUMBER: 0446 -93 -PIER TO: Donald Granger CC: Dan Boyd FROM: David Moskovitz DATE: May 25, 2017 SUBJECT: Supplemental Vegetation Analysis — Day Creek Square Project, City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California. On May 15, 2017, I visited the Day Creek Square project site in Rancho Cucamonga to perform a supplemental vegetation analysis, including an updated assessment of the vegetation mapping and an updated rare plant survey. Glenn Lukos Associates, Inc. (GLA) previously performed biological surveys for the site in 2016, and prepared a Biological Technical Report (revised dated April 21, 2017) documenting the results of those surveys. The Biological Technical Report (BTR) documented that the majority of the site (25.48 acres) supports a native scrub community dominated by California buckwheat (Eriogonum fasciculatum), which is a subassociation of Riversidean Sage Scrub (RSS), but also includes other scrub species commonly associated with RSS communities such as California sagebrush (Artemisia californica) and white sage (Salvia apiana). A peer review memorandum (dated April 6, 2017) prepared by Michael Baker International noted patches of "coastal sage scrub", i.e., what they referred to as patches dominated by California sagebrush. In a response memorandum (dated April 21, 2017), GLA noted that the patches are not large in the context of the dominance of buckwheat at the site, and as such GLA purposely did not call these out as a separate mapping unit. During the May 1511' visit, I mapped the two patches where there is a greater dominance of sagebrush relative to the other shrub species. One patch is located in the northern portion of the site and is approximately 0.28 acre. The second patch is located near the western edge of the property and is approximately 0.92 acre. Both of these patches are relatively small, and the presence of the sagebrush -dominated areas does not affect the findings of the BTR, which is that impacts to the scrub habitats at the site would be less than significant and would not require mitigation, as a fimction of repeated disturbance, relative isolation from other larger patches of native habitats, and the general lack of special -status species. The Michael Balser memorandum inferred concurrence with GLA's findings. The BTR documented that the vegetation at the property is an outlying remnant of a broader alluvial scrub, or more specifically, Riversidean Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub (RAFSS) vegetation 29 Orchard Lake Forest California 92630-8300 TC Ic�IRTelephone; (949) 837-0404 Facsimile; (949) 837-5834 EX IBIT 0 P787 MEMORANDUM May 25, 2017 Page 2 community associated with alluvial surfaces. RAFSS specifically has a CSS component where the shrubs species are characteristic of RSS, which is an inland expression of CSS. The only dominant species that has a strong fidelity to alluvial scrub is scalebroom (Lepidosparturn sguamatum), which present at the project site. Sawyer et al (2009) categorizes vegetation communities with a greater than I% cover of scalebroom as scalebroom scrub. However, the project site does not contain enough scalebroom for the site to be categorized as scalebroom scrub. During the May 15`h site visit, I mapped 37 scalebroom individuals with an average individual area of 50 square feet, for a total scalebroom cover of approximately 1,800 square feet (0.04 acre). With the overall 25.48 acres of scrub habitat, the percentage of scalebroom is 0.16 (under two-tenths of one percent), which is well under the one -percent threshold. As such, California buckwheat scrub is the appropriate designation for the site. As noted above, I also conducted an updated survey of the site for special -status plants during the May 15th visit. No special -status plants were detected at the site during the survey, which was consistent with survey performed in 2016. If you have any questions regarding this memorandum, please contact me at (949) 837-0404, ext. 42 or at dmoskovitz/ a?wetlandpermitting.com. p:0446-93c.mem,docx P788 RESOLUTION NO.17-54 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2016-00452 – A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN ZONING DESIGNATION FOR 28.4 -ACRES OF LAND FROM REGIONALLY RELATED OFFICE/COMMERCIAL (RROC) TO MIXED USE (MU) IN THE VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN (VCP) RELATED TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF A MIXED USE PROJECT CONSISTING OF 380 RESIDENTIAL UNITS, A 71 ROOM HOTEL AND TWO RESTAURANT BUILDINGS TOTALING 12,000 SQUARE FEET, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD AND BASE LINE ROAD; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF —APN: 1090-331-05. A. Recitals. 1. D.R. Horton filed an application for Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRC2016- 00452, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development District Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 14th day of June, 2017, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and issued Resolution No 17-54 recommending to the City Council that the associated Victoria Community Plan Amendment be approved. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing on June 14, 2017, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to approximately 28.4 acres of land, basically a rectangular configuration, located at the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Day Creek Boulevard, and is presently vacant. Said property is currently designated as Regionally Related Office/Commercial; and b. The property to the north of the subject site is designated Village Commercial and is currently under construction as a neighborhood shopping center. The property to the west is designated Open Space and contains overhead electrical transmission lines and a flood control channel. The property to the east is designated Mixed Use/Village Commercial and Mixed Use Single -Family, and is developed with a neighborhood shopping center and single-family dwelling Attachment 2 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-54 VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2016-00452 P789 DR NORTON June 14, 2017 Page 2 units. The property to the south is designated Mixed Use Single -Family and is developed with single-family dwelling units; and C. The amendment is consistent with the General Plan and will implement the goals of the General Plan as this location is designated Mixed Use in the General Plan. The amendment will change the zoning from Regionally Related Office/Commercial to Mixed Use and will bring the zoning of the Victoria Community Plan into vertical consistency with the General Plan and will facilitate the development of a mixed use project, thereby implementing General Plan Policy LU -2.1 which plans for vibrant, pedestrian -friendly mixed use and high density residential areas at strategic infill locations along transit routes. Accordingly, this amendment is consistent with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and d. This amendment will provide for a mixed use project that has been designed with input from the community and with a goal of protecting neighborhoods from the encroachment of incompatible activities by including the design of a linear parking along the southern edge to function as a buffer to the existing neighboring uses to the south, thereby implementing General Plan Land Use Policy LU -1.1 by minimizing negative impacts on the residential living environment. Accordingly, the amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and e. The amendment will provide for a mixed use project that will have detached single- family condos and attached single-family rowhomes in a location that is compatible with the adjacent residential area. The mixed use project has the single-family detached condos located in the southern area of the project, nearest the existing single-family neighborhood in order to provide a transition of density and be of compatible scale, thereby being consistent with General Plan Land Use Policy LU -1 which encourages small lot detached dwelling units to locate in areas where it will be compatible with adjacent neighborhoods. Accordingly, this amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed Victoria Community Plan Amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for the development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development. The amendment will provide for a mixed use project that will have detached single-family condos and attached single- family rowhomes in a location that is compatible with the adjacent residential area. The mixed use project has the single-family detached condos located in the southern area of the project, nearest the existing single-family neighborhood in order to provide a transition of density and be of compatible scale, thereby being consistent with General Plan Land Use Policy LU -1.6 which encourages small lot detached dwelling units to locate in areas where it will be compatible with adjacent neighborhoods. Accordingly, this amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and b. The proposed Victoria Community Plan Amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Victoria Community Plan which in turn are consistent with and implement the goals F'LHIVIVIIV(� UUIV11VI1JJIUN Kt6ULU I IUN NU. 1 /-54 VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2016-00452 P790 DR NORTON June 14, 2017 Page 3 and objectives of the General Plan. These goals include promoting the economical and efficient use of land, promoting design and construction techniques that are responsive to the environment, and promoting development compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. The proposed amendment will change the zoning from Regionally Related Office/Commercial to Mixed Use and will bring the zoning of the Victoria Community Plan into vertical consistency with the General Plan and will facilitate the development of a mixed use project, thereby implementing General Plan Policy LU -2.1 which plans for vibrant, pedestrian -friendly mixed use and high density residential areas at strategic infill locations along transit routes; and c. The proposed Victoria Community Plan Amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. This amendment will provide for a mixed use project that has been designed with input from the community and with a goal of protecting neighborhoods from the encroachment of incompatible activities by including the design of a linear parking along the southern edge to function as a buffer to the existing neighboring to the south, thereby implementing General Plan Land Use Policy LU -1.1 by minimizing negative impacts on the residential living environment. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends that the City Council adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQX) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission furtherfinds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore and recommends that the City Council adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-54 VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2016-00452 DR HORTON June 14, 2017 Page 4 upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the City Planner of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRC2016-00452 as shown in Exhibit "A" subject to each and every condition set forth below. Planning Department 1) Approval is for Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRC2016-00452, to change the zoning from Regionally Related Office/Commercial to Mixed Use for 28.4 acres of land from Regionally Related Office/Commercial (RROC) to Mixed Use (MU) related to the construction of a mixed use project consisting of 380 Residential Units, a 71 room hotel, and two restaurant buildings totaling 12,000 square feet, located at the southwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road -- APN: 1090-331-05. 2) Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRC2016-00452 requires final approval by the City Council. 3) Approval is contingent upon City Council adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for the project and the Mitigation Monitoring Program and all mitigations contained therein. 4) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances. 5) The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF JUNE 2017. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P791 'PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-54 VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2016-00452 DR HORTON June 14, 2017 Page 5 BY: �z rancisco Oaxaca, Chairman ATTEST: Cand a Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of June 2017, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, MUNOZ, OAXACA, WIMBERLY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MACIAS ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: NONE P792 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: 1090-331-05 TOTAL ACREAGE: 28.44 ACRES EXISTING ZONING: REGIONALLY RELATED OFFICE / COMMERCIAL r IPG � I iN I r�- --- EXHIBIT A (NMADOLE 9302 I' TSBURGH A S XM 230 AVE- mii6 RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CA 91730 PHONE 909.481.6322 awfnrering Com wnhks for Life FAX 909.481.6320 -----BASE TNE L ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: 1090-331-05 TOTAL ACREAGE: 28.44 ACRES PROPOSED ZONING: MIXED USE P794 (NM A D O L E 9302 PITTSSURGH AVE, &XIE 230 IF M4CHO CLICAMONCLA, CA. 91730 IBM PHONE 909.4816322 &Wftwerfng Communities for LrYe FAX 909.4816320 �I�illl��!j; V7 III I. lijl (NM A D O L E 9302 PITTSSURGH AVE, &XIE 230 IF M4CHO CLICAMONCLA, CA. 91730 IBM PHONE 909.4816322 &Wftwerfng Communities for LrYe FAX 909.4816320 P795 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIONS RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA A. 7:00 P.M. --- CALL TO ORDER Pledge of Allegiance 700 PM Roll Call: Chairman Oaxaca _X Vice Chairman Macias _A Commissioner Fletcher X Commissioner Munoz Commissioner Wimberly _X^ Additional Staff Present Candyce Bumett, City Planner, Jeff Bloom, Deputy City Manager/Economic and Community Development Nick Ghirelll Assistant City Attorney, Tom Grahn, Associate Planner, Donald Granger Senior Planner, Albert Espinoza Asst. City Engineer, Dominick Perez. Associate Planner, Lois Schrader Planning Commission Secretary Mike Smith, Senior Planner; Tabe van der Zweag, Associate Planner, Dat Tran Assistant Planner B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Historic Preservation Commission or Planning Commission on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Commission from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Commission may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to 5 minutes per Individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals embers of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. Kevin Ellis - A resident adjacent to the development at Day Creek and Base Line Road, expressed concerns about the additional traffic load anticipated with the proposed project. Don Horvatch - Spoke regarding Item E4 noting his residence is south of the Etiwanda Preserve. He expressed concern that the rest area will be moved from the preserve to next to his house. He also noted that when the house product is proposed he would prefer single story homes to preserve his views. Page 1 of 10 Attachment 3 P796 --- -.._.-...--..-.. --• - - ___ _ ..- -.. - - - - �. ^� �.. .� A JUNE 14, 2017 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIONS RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA C. CONSENT CALENDAR/HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non -controversial. They will be acted upon by the Commission at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed for discussion. C1 Consideration to adopt Regular Meeting Minutes of May 24. 2017 C2. Consideration to adopt Adjourned (Workshop) Meeting Minutes of May 24, 2017 Moved by Munoz, seconded by Fletcher carried 3-0-1-1 (Oaxaca abstain, Macias absent) to adopt the minutes of May 24, 2017. D. DIRECTOR'S STAFF REPORTS The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Chairman may open the meeting for public input. D1 PROPOSED REVIEW PROCEDURES AND POTENTIAL DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT APPLICABLE TO HAUNTED HOUSES IN RESIDENCES/RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS The Secretary received and riled the report and the Commission gave general direction to staff to bring back draft amendment language as well as statistics regarding the complaints received. There was some concern among the Commissioners regarding haunted houses in the Residential Districts and they indicated additional controls may be in order overall. E. PUBLIC HEARINGS/PLANNING COMMISSION The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chairman will open the public hearing to receive testimony. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual or less as determined by the Chairman. Please sign in after speaking. Page 2of10 P797 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIONS RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA E1. DESIGN REVIEW DRC2015-00991 --WECARE DIALYSIS CENTER —The development of a 10,912 square foot medical office building on 1.13 acres in the General Commercial (GC) District, on the east side of Grove Avenue, approximately 500 feet south of Arrow Route, located at 8591 Grove Avenue - APN: 0207-222-27. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA guidelines as a Class 32 Exemption (CEQA Section 15332) for In -fill Development Projects CONTINUED FROM MAY 24, 2017. Moved by Wimberly, seconded by Fletcher carried 4-0-1 (Macias absent) to adopt the Resolution of Approval No. 17-63 approving Design Review DRC2015-00991. E2 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT20073 — LEWIS MANAGEMENT CORP. — A review of a proposed subdivision of a property of about 84 acres into twenty-seven (27) parcels and one (1) lettered lot located within the Empire Lakes Specific Plan, Planning Area 1, located north of 4th Street, south of 6th Street, west of Milliken Avenue, and east of Utica/Cleveland Avenues - APNs: 0210-082-41, -49, and -52. Related files; General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00114, Specific Plan Amendment DRC2015-00040, Development Code Amendment DRC2015-00115, and Pre -Application Review DRC2017-00170. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City certified an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) on May 18, 2016 in connection with the City's approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00114, Specific Plan Amendment DRC2015-00040, and Development Code Amendment DRC2015-00115. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project. CONTINUED FROM MAY 24, 2017. Moved by Fletcher, seconded by Wimberly carried 4-0-1 (Macias absent) to continue Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20073 to the June 281h meeting. E3 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT20105 — LEWIS MANAGEMENT CORP — A review of a proposed subdivision of a property of about 82 acres into five (5) parcels located within the Empire Lakes Specific Plan, Planning Area 1, located north of 6th Street, south of the Metrolink/BNSF rail line, west of Milliken Avenue, and east of Utica/Cleveland Avenues - APN 0209-272-20. Related files General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00114, Specific Plan Amendment DRC2015-00040, Development Code Amendment DRC2015-00115, and Pre - Application Review DRC2017-00170. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City certified an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) on May 18, 2016 in connection with the City's approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00114, Specific Plan Amendment DRC2015-00040, and Development Code Amendment DRC2015-00115. Page 3 of 10 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG ' JUNE 14, 2017 P798 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIONS RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162. no subsequent or supplemental EIR is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project. Moved by Fletcher, seconded by Wimberly carried 4-0-1 (Macias absent) to continue Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20105 to the June 281h meeting. E4. TIME EXTENSION DRC2017-00430 - GOLDEN MEADOWLAND, LLC. AND RANCH HAVEN, LLC. - A request for a fourth one-year time extension for a previously approved tentative tract map (Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16072) to subdivide 150.79 acres into 358 lots in the Low (2-4 dwell; ng units per acre) Residential District, with an average density of 2.3 dwelling units per acre for the entire project, in the Upper Etiwanda Neighborhood of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan, located at northeast comer of Wilson Avenue and Etiwanda Avenue - APN 0225-083-01, 12, 13, 15, 16 and 20. Staff has found the project to be within the scope of the project covered by a prior Environmental Impact Report certified by City Council in June 16. 2004 by Resolution 04-204 and does not raise or create new environmental impacts not already considered in the Environmental Impact Report. Moved by Wimberly, seconded by Fletcher carried 4-0-1 (Macias absent) to adopt Resolution of Approval No. 17-64 approving Time Extension DRC2017-00430 as amended. Items E5 -E9 were heard concurrently. E5 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT20042 — NH WEAVER LANE, LLC - A request to subdivide 18.2 acres of land into 26 lots for the purposes of developing 26 single-family residences for a site located on the east side of Carnelian Street and north of Hillside Road in the Very Low (VL) District (.1 — 2 Dwelling Units per Acre). the Hillside Overlay District and the Equestrian Overlay District - APN: 1061-261-01. Related records: Hillside Design Review DRC2016-00377, Variance DRC2016-00748, Variance DRC2017-00014 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2016-00376. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. E6. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2016-00377 — NH WEAVER LANE, LLC - A request for site plan and architectural review of 26 single-family residences on 18.2 acres of land related to Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20042, located on the east side of Carnelian Street and north of Hillside Road in the Very Low (VL) District (A — 2 Dwelling Units per Acre) the Hillside Overlay District and the Equestrian Overlay District - APN 1061-261-01. Related records: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20042, Variance DRC2016- Page 4 of 10 P799 - - - -- - - 7 - - - - HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIONS RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 00748, Variance DRC2017-00014 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2016-00376. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. E7. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VARIANCE DRC2016-00748 - NH WEAVER LANE. LLC - A request to reduce the required lot depth of Lots 11 - 15 by approximately 13 feet related to Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20042 located on the east side of Carnelian Street and north of Hillside Road in the Very Low (VL) District (.1 — 2 Dwelling Units per Acre the Hillside Overlay District and the Equestrian Overlay District - APN: 1061-261-01. Related records Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20042, Hillside Design Review DRC2016-00377, Variance DRC2017-00014 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2016-00376. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. E8. ENVIRONMENT ASSESSMENT AND VARIANCE DRC2017-00014 - NH WEAVER LANE. LLC — A request to reduce the rear yard setback on Lot 16 by approximately 23 feet related Hillside Design Review DRC2016-00377, located on the east side of Carnelian Street and north of Hillside Road in the Very Low (VL) District (.1 — 2 Dwelling Units per Acre), the Hillside Overlay District and the Equestrian Overlay District - APN. 1061-261-01. Related records: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20042, Hillside Design Review DRC2016-00377, Variance DRC2016-00748 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2016-00376. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. E9. ENVIRONMENT ASSESSMENT AND TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2016-00376 - NH WEAVER LANE, LLC —A request to remove 7 heritage trees related to Hillside Design Review DRC2016-00377, located on the east side of Carnelian and north of Hillside Road in the Very Low (VL) Development District (.1 — 2 Dwelling Units per Acre), the Hillside Overlay District and the Equestrian Overlay District - APN: 1061-261-01. Related records: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20042. Hillside Design Review DRC2016-00377, Variance DRC2016-00748 and Variance DRC2017-00014. Moved by Munoz, seconded by Wimberly carried 4-0-1 (Macias) to adopt the following Resolutions of Approval: 17-49 approving Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20042; 17-50 approving Hillside Design Review DRC2016-00377; 17-52 approving Variance DRC2016- 00748; 17-51 approving Variance DRC2017-00014; 17-53 approving Tree Removal Permit DRC2016-00376. Page 5 of 10 P800 JUNE 14, 2017 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIONS RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Items E10 -E16 were heard concurrently. E10. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2016-00452 – DR HORTON – A request to change the Victoria Community Plan Zoning Designation for 28.4 acres of land at the southwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road from Regionally Related Office/Commercial (RROC) to Mixed Use (MU) in the Victoria Community Plan (VCP) related to the construction of a mixed use project consisting of 380 residential units, a 71 room hotel and two restaurant buildings totaling 12 000 square feet, located at the southwest comer of Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road — APN 1090-331-05. Related Files: Preliminary Review DRC2015-01102, Pre -Application Review DRC2016-00142, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19762, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20032 Conditional Use Permit DRC2016-00449, Design Review DRC2016-00450, Uniform Sign Program DRC2016-00451 and Minor Exception DRC2016-00508. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. This item will be forwarded to the City Council for final review and action. Ell. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19762 – DR HORTON – A request to subdivide 28.4 acres of land into 4 parcels in the Victoria Community Plan (VCP) within the Mixed Use District related to the construction of a mixed use project consisting of 380 residential units, a 71 room hotel and two restaurant buildings totaling 12,000 square feet, located at the southwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road — APN: 1090-331-05. Related Files: Preliminary Review DRC2015-01102, Pre -Application Review DRC2016-00142, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20032, Conditional Use Permit DRC2016-00449, Design Review DRC2016-00450, Uniform Sign Program DRC2016-00451, Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRC2016-00452 and Minor Exception DRC2016- 00508. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. E12. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT20032 – DR HORTON – A request for a residential condominium subdivision for 380 residential units on 28.4 acres of land in the Victoria Community Plan (VCP) within the Mixed Use District related to the construction of a mixed use project consisting of 380 residential units, a 71 room hotel and two restaurant buildings totaling 12,000 square feet, located at the southwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road —APN: 1090-331-05. Related Files: Preliminary Review DRC2015-01102, Pre -Application Review DRC2016-00142, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19762, Conditional Use Permit DRC2016-00449, Design Review DRC2016-00450, Uniform Sign Program DRC2016-00451, Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRC2016- Page 6 of 10 JUNE 14, 2017 P801 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIONS RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 00452 and Minor Exception DRC2016-00508. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. E13. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2016-00450 – DR HORTON – A request for site plan and architectural review in the Victoria Community Plan (VCP) within the Mixed Use District related to the construction of a mixed use project consisting of 380 residential units, a 71 room hotel and two restaurant buildings totaling 12,000 square feet, located at the southwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road --- APN: 1090- 331-05. Related Files: Preliminary Review DRC2015-01102, Pre -Application Review DRC2016-00142, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19762, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20032. Conditional Use Permit DRC2016-00449, Uniform Sign Program DRC2016-00451, Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRC2016-00452 and Minor Exception DRC2016-00508. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. E14. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2016-00449 – DR HORTON – A request to operate a bar (Type 70 On Sale General – Restrictive Service) within a hotel in the Victoria Community Plan (VCP) within the Mixed Use District related to the construction of a mixed use project consisting of 380 residential units, a 71 room hotel and two restaurant buildings totaling 12,000 square feet, located at the southwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road — APN: 1090-331-05. Related Files: Preliminary Review DRC2015-01102, Pre -Application Review DRC2016-00142, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19762, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20032, Design Review DRC2016-00450 and Uniform Sign Program DRC2016-00451, Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRC2016- 00452 and Minor Exception DRC2016-00508. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. E15, ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2016-00508 – DR HORTON – A request to allow 8 foot combination retaining/freestanding wall heights for a mixed use project in the Victoria Community Plan (VCP) within the Mixed Use District related to the construction of a mixed use project consisting of 380 residential units, a 71 room hotel and two restaurant buildings totaling 12,000 square feet, located at the southwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road —APN: 1090-331-05. Related Files: Preliminary Review DRC2015-01102, Pre -Application Review DRC2016-00142, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19762, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20032, Conditional Use Permit DRC2016-00449, Design Review DRC2016-00450, Uniform Sign Program DRC2016-00451 and Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRC2016-00452. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. Page 7 of 10 P802 - ---- - -- - - HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIONS RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA E16. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM DRC2016-00451 –DR HORTON – A request for a Uniform Sign Program in the Victoria Community Plan (VCP) within the Mixed Use District related to the construction of a mixed use project consisting of 380 residential units, a 71 room hotel and two restaurant buildings totaling 12,000 square feet located at the southwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road — APN: 1090- 331-05. Related Files: Preliminary Review DRC2015-01102, Pre -Application Review DRC2016-00142, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19762, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20032, Conditional Use Permit DRC2016-00449, Design Review DRC2016-00450, Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRC2016-00452 and Minor Exception DRC2016-00508. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. Moved by Wimberly, seconded by Munoz, carried 4-0-1 (Macias absent) to adopt Resolution 17-54 recommending approval for Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRC2016-00452 to be forwarded to the City Council with the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for final action. Moved by Wimberly, seconded by Munoz, carried 4-0-1 (Macias absent) to adopt the following Resolutions of Approval: 17-55 approving Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19762 (as amended Condition 13); 17-56 approving Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20032; 17-57 approving Design Review DRC2016-00450; 17-58 approving Conditional Use Permit DRC2016-00449; 17-60 approving Minor Exception DRC2016- 00508 and 17-59 approving Uniform Sign Program DRC2016-00451. F. COMMISSION BUSINESS/HISTORIC PRESERVATION AND PLANNING COMMISSION INTER -AGENCY UPDATES: Commissioner Munoz said he would provide a report at the next meeting. COMMISSION ANNOUNCEMENTS: None Page 8 of 10 JUNE 14, 2017 P803 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIONS RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA G. ADJOURNMENT 1:35 PM I, Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on June 8, 2017 seventy two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. /LS/ Lois J. Schrader Planning Commission Secretary City of Rancho Cucamonga If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meoting, please contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the agenda. please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position. you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the and+ence should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After speaking, please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium. It is important to list Page 9 of 10 P804 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIONS RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally ':mited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under Public Comments ' There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda. Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. A copy of any such materials should also be provided to the Secretary to be used for the official public record. All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing Requests for scheduling agenda items will be at the discretion of the Commission and the Planning Director AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p m, except for legal City holidays. APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of $2,662 for all decisions of the Commission (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas, staff reports and minutes can be found at www.CitvofRC.us. Page 10 of 10 E10 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA He said they met all TAC requests and access accommodation for the RV owner. Commissioner Munoz concurred a said it is a good project. Chairman Oaxaca said he was also present for-,. said the project strikes a good balance with a challenging parcel. Commissioner Fletcher said the V equests are reasonable. Moved by Munoz, se by Wimberly, carried 4-0-1 (Macias abstain) to adopt the following Re -so of Approval: 17-49 approving Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20042; 17-50 ap illside Design Review DRC2016-00377; 17-52 approving Variance DR 748; 17-51 approving Variance DRC2017-00014; 17-53 approving Tree va/ Permit DRC2016-00376. Items E10 -E16 were heard concurrently. See minutes below. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2016-00452 - DR HORTON - A request to change the Victoria Community Plan Zoning Designation for 28.4 acres of land at the southwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road from Regionally Related Office/Commercial (RROC) to Mixed Use (MU) in the Victoria Community Plan (VCP) related to the construction of a mixed use project consisting of 380 residential units, a 71 room hotel and two restaurant buildings totaling 12,000 square feet, located at the southwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road — APN: 1090-331-05, Related Files: Preliminary Review DRC2015-01102, Pre -Application Review DRC2016-00142, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19762, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20032. Conditional Use Permit DRC2016-00449, Design Review DRC2016-00450, Uniform Sign Program DRC2016-00451 and Minor Exception DRC2016-00508. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. This item will be forwarded to the City Council for final review and action. Ell. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19762 -DR HORTON - A request to subdivide 28.4 acres of land into 4 parcels in the Victoria Community Plan (VCP) within the Mixed Use District related to the construction of a mixed use project consisting of 380 residential units, a 71 room hotel and two restaurant buildings totaling 12,000 Page 10 of 18 ATTACHMENT 4 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA square feet, located at the southwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road -- APN: 1090-331-05. Related Files: Preliminary Review DRC2015-01102, Pre -Application Review DRC2016-00142, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20032, Conditional Use Permit DRC2016-00449, Design Review DRC2016-00450. Uniform Sign Program DRC2016-00451. Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRC2016-00452 and Minor Exception DRC2016- 00508. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. E12. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT20032 – DR HORTON – A request for a residential condominium subdivision for 380 residential units on 28.4 acres of land in the Victoria Community Plan (VCP) within the Mixed Use District related to the construction of a mixed use project consisting of 380 residential units, a 71 room hotel and two restaurant buildings totaling 12,000 square feet, located at the southwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road —APN: 1090-331-05. Related Files: Preliminary Review DRC2015-01102, Pre -Application Review DRC2016-00142. Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19762, Conditional Use Permit DRC2016-00449. Design Review DRC2016-00450, Uniform Sign Program DRC2016-00451, Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRC2016- 00452 and Minor Exception DRC2016-00508. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. E13. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2016-00450 – DR HORTON – A request for site plan and architectural review in the Victoria Community Plan (VCP) within the Mixed Use District related to the construction of a mixed use project consisting of 380 residential units, a 71 room hotel and two restaurant buildings totaling 12,000 square feet, located at the southwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road — APN: 1090- 331-05. Related Files: Preliminary Review DRC2015-01102, Pre -Application Review DRC2016-00142, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19762, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20032, Conditional Use Permit DRC2016-00449, Uniform Sign Program DRC2016-00451, Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRC2016-00452 and Minor Exception DRC2016-00508. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. E14. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2016-00449 – DR HORTON – A request to operate a bar (Type 70 On Sale General – Restrictive Service) within a hotel in the Victoria Community Plan (VCP) within the Mixed Use District related to the construction of a mixed use project consisting of 380 residential units, a 71 room hotel and two restaurant buildings totaling 12,000 square feet, located at the southwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road — APN: 1090-331-05. Related Files: Preliminary Review DRC2015-01102, Pre -Application Review DRC2016-00142, Tentative Parcel Map Page 11 of 18 JUNE 14, 2017 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA SUBTPM19762. Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20032. Design Review DRC2016-00450 and Uniform Sign Program DRC2016-00451, Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRC2016- 00452 and Minor Exception DRC2016-00508. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. E15. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2016-00508 – DR HORTON – A request to allow 8 foot combination retaining/freestanding wall heights for a mixed use project in the Victoria Community Plan (VCP) within the Mixed Use District related to the construction of a mixed use project consisting of 380 residential units. a 71 room hotel and two restaurant buildings totaling 12,000 square feet, located at the southwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road —APN: 1090-331-05. Related Files: Preliminary Review DRC2015-01102, Pre -Application Review DRC2016-00142, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19762, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20032. Conditional Use Permit DRC2016-00449, Design Review DRC2016-00450, Uniform Sign Program DRC2016-00451 and Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRC2016-00452. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. E16. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM DRC2016-00451 –DR HORTON –A request for a Uniform Sign Program in the Victoria Community Plan (VCP) within the Mixed Use District related to the construction of a mixed use project consisting of 380 residential units, a 71 room hotel and two restaurant buildings totaling 12,000 square feet, located at the southwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road — APN: 1090- 331-05. Related Files: Preliminary Review DRC2015-01102, Pre -Application Review DRC2016-00142, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19762, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20032, Conditional Use Permit DRC2016-00449, Design Review DRC2016-00450, Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRC2016-00452 and Minor Exception DRC2016-00508. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. Donald Granger, Senior Planner gave the staff report and PowerPoint presentation (copy on file). He said correspondence was received from the County of San Bernardino and California Fish and Wildlife, Natasha Walton (biologist), Grace Aquiar. and Tina Stoner all expressing concems about the loss of RAFSS, loss of Buckwheat, etc A letter of support was receive from Kevin Brown, Sr Mr Granger noted the applicant performed 15 studies and had 4 to assess biological impacts. He said Focus studies were done on the San Bernardino Kangaroo rat, DSFLF and the California gnatcatcher He said the studies also received a peer review from an outside biologist. He said the applicant has read all conditions and there is one condition of concern found on page 416 #13 re. phasing. He said the applicant is requesting to change the condition. Page 12 of 18 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Commissioner Fletcher noted the linear park buffers homes to south. He asked if a full east - west boundary design was considered. Mr. Granger said the developer responded to the request for a park. Also, the PD was hesitant to have park extend to the southwest corner of the site because of the potential for nuisance/bad activity could occur there. He said in this proposed configuration, eyes would be on it. Commissioner Fletcher asked how the shared parking for the restaurants would be monitored and if that would affect the restaurant parking. Mr. Granger said there -will be signs posted and possible wording may be added to the CC&Rs-they will have to craft specific signage and language. Commissioner Fletcher asked about the CEQA concerns from the County and State and if the city solely decides on that. Mr. Ghirelli said agencies already had an opportunity to comment on the environmental docs. There is no further noticing required at this point. , Dan Boyd, VP for DR Horton said the linear park and shared parking agreement would be a recorded document. He summarized the attributes of the project and said staff covered every detail. Chairman Oaxaca opened the public hearing. David Maskowich, project biologist for the applicant and holding a Masters in Biology, summarized the results of the biological surveys. He explained the different classification systems now used. Lorena Ponci, a homeowner said we have lost the natural element and there is too much development in the City. It will add 1; 000 more vehicles / too aggressive and too noisey. Mr. Ghirelli suggested the following wording for the revised condition noted for the record for the applicant's consideration. He said the city is not committing to approving a development agreement at this time. Page 13 of 18 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA "No more than 65%of the permits for the residential units (247 units) shall be issued unless building permits for the hotel and two restaurant buildings have been issued. Occupancy for the residential units shall be limited to 90% (342) units) until occupancy has been approved for the hotel and the two restaurant buildings. The applicant may seek to alter or remove this condition by way of a development agreement adopted in accordance with State law, provided that this condition shall not be construed to commit the City to approve a development agreement. " Commissioner Fletcher asked for clarification. Mr. Ghirelli said that if it benefits the city later on we could remove the need for the development agreement. Malory Lipert said she is in favor of the project and said she is glad native species will be grown in the gardens. Alison Sides said she is in support as this is the next level of smart community planning and this is a desirable destination. Matt Lipert said he is in support. He said it is a great plan for new families with flexible pedestrian access. Tim Avengeno offered support and said it is innovative planning that appeals to young professionals. Natashia Walton thanked the developer and Mr. Granger for looking into the bio issues. She said she is disappointed with the report regarding remnant sage scrub. She said it has value because it is used by birds and pollinator. She said more needs to be done such as adding more open space, build fewer homes, and make a connection to the drainage area. Chairman Oaxaca closed the public hearing. Dan Boyd said the Mixed Use concept includes higher density and it is called for by the General Plan. He said they did traffic analysis and Base Line and Day Creek are both major arterials designed for that many cars. He said regarding Ms. Walton's comments — she's asked for more sycamores, oaks and additional natives and we did it all. He noted as a developer they want appropriate balance and also achieved the city's landscape requirement and they put in a linear park. He said they already removed many homes from the southerly Page 14 of 18 _- _ - 7 - _ _ _ HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA boundary as the concept was for a buffer not a big public park. He said the biological report is sufficient and had a peer review and reached the same conclusions as staff. Commissioner Fletcher asked about the phasing plan -building timeline. Mr Boyd said once they receive all their approvals, they will not be phased., they would start and go to finish. He said sales will govern phases for each product line. He said all architectural approvals will go at once. He said they have to be careful and said they can discuss alternatives. We do not want to stymie the residential portion. He said if they agree to the alternative language to the conditions they will need some flexibility. He said they are not looking for an escape route. He indicated the new condition language is satisfactory. Marianne Adriatico, legal counsel for DR Horton said this offers added protection to the city - so city got the assurance the hotel and restaurants will be built. Mr. Ghirelli said staff has drafted condition 13 - but DR Horton asked for security other than via withholding building permits which could be cash. letter of credit, bonds, etc. He said he is also not comfortable in putting in a financial payment in the condition. He said the development agreement is not guaranteed. He confirmed the condition in question is attached to the resolution for the Tentative Parcel Map # 17-55 and the applicant may seek to alter or remove this condition. Commissioner Fletcher said the developer did a true Mixed Use development, He said he was initially concerned the restaurant and hotel might not happen with the residential portion of the development and he stressed the importance that they deliver a "full project" and attempt to exclude the hotel/restaurant portion because of the market etc. He said it has an excellent design and he likes the concept. He said it will add a village community to that area. He said the fiscal impact to the city could be beneficial. He said he appreciates the excess parking. He said the design is compatible with the community- good architecture.' Commissioner Wimberly concurred and noted the unique plotting. He said this corner will be a signature spot. Commissioner Munoz concurred and thanked staff and the developer for the unique project. He thanked the public and noted the Commission tries to do the right thing with traffic and parking. He said the project is near Victoria Gardens noting we attract people from everywhere. He said the linear park buffer is a good idea. He said this project means more affordable housing will be available. Page 15 of 18 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Chairman Oaxaca said we all have had to shift our thinking for those who have lived here for many years. Changes we have seen have been positive and Rancho Cucamonga is a model of smart and well -thought out development. He said the project is reflective of what reality is. He said it is a good balance. Moved by Wimberly, seconded by Munoz, carried 4-0-1 (Macias absent) to adopt Resolution 17-54 recommending approval for Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRC2016-00452 to be forwarded to the City Council with the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for final action. Moved by Wimberly, seconded by Munoz, carried 4-0-1 (Macias absent) to adopt the following Resolutions of Approval: 17-55 approving Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19762 (as amended with Condition 13 reworded); 17-56 approving Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20032; 17-57 approving Design Review DRC2016-00450; 17-58 approving Conditional Use Permit DRC2016-00449; 17-60 approving Minor Exception -� DRC2016-00508 and 17-59 approving Uniform Sign Program DRC2016-00451. F. COMMISSION BUSINESS/HISTORIC PRESERVATION AND PLANNING COMMISSION Comm sssioner Munoz said he would provide a report at the next meeting. COMMISSION ANNOUNCEMENTS: G. ADJOORNMENT 0.35 P PA. I, Lois J. Schrader, Mann* mmission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby ce ' at a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on Page 16 of 18 n j if '% P812 825 East Third Street, San Bernardino. CA 92415-0835 ( Phone 909 387 8109 Fax 909.387 7876 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY June 12, 2017 City of Rancho Cucamonga Attn: Donald Granger, Senior Planner Planning Department P.O. Box 807 Department of Public Works • Flood Control • Operation, • Solid Waste Management • Sur%eyor • 'Fransportation Gerry Newcombe Director File: 10(ENV)-4.01 Rancho Cucamonga, CA. 91729 RE: CEQA — NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE DAY CREEK SQUARE PROJECT FOR THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Dear Mr. Granger: Thank you for allowing the San Bernardino County Department of Public Works the opportunity to comment on the above -referenced project. We received this request on May 4, 2017 and pursuant to our review, the following comments are provided: GENERAL COMMENTS We are aware there may be storm drains in and around the project site that may be affected by the proposed project. When planning for or altering existing or future storm drains, be advised that the Project is subject to the Comprehensive Storm Drain Plan (CSDP) project #2 dated March 1969. Please refer to this plan as a guideline for drainage in the area and is available in the San Bernardino County Flood Control District's (District) office. If you have any questions, please contact Michael Fam in the Flood Control Planning Division at 909.387-8120. Permits/Operations Support Division (Melissa Walker, Chief, 909-387-7995): 1. Since this project is near the District's Channel Creek facility, any work affecting the right-of-way would need a Flood Control Permit. If these permits are required, their necessity and any impacts associated with the construction should be addressed in the IS/MND. Environmental Management Division Patrick E le Planner III 909-387-1865 : Page 33 of the Biological Technical Report (report) states, "The habitat at the Project site has been disturbed over the years, such that the site is dominated by California buckwheat, giving the site the appearance of alluvial scrub vegetation in an earlier stage of ecological succession." The quality of the vegetation community should not be downgraded based on disturbance. Exhibit 4 within the same document identifies the majority of the area (25.48 acres) as Buckwheat scrub and the smaller north western corner of the project site as Disturbed Buckwheat Scrub (2.96), no mention of the larger swaths of buckwheat scrub as being disturbed. When describing a "disturbed" site such as t p BOARD OF SUPERVISORS A Rom Ri A LOVINGOOD IANRA- Rl:1HFRFORD JAWS RAMOS (;Rv 11 AGN1AN IoSli. C a Chairman, First District Second District Durd District Vice Chairman, fourth District Filth Des I . 4 RAFSS as perhaps lowering the intrinsic value of the habitat, be reminded that RAFSS by its very nature is disturbed. The fact that it is disturbed only adds to its health. EMD recommends re -writing both this portion of the report and the IS/MND to properly reflect the quality of habitat that exists on-site. 2. The report is not consistent in its description of the vegetation classification on the project site. Page 18 of the Biological Technical Report, first complete paragraph, describes the vegetation as "a scrub vegetation community dominated by California buckwheat". It continues to state "Buckwheat scrub is a sub association of Riversidean Sage Scrub (RSS), which is an inland type of Coastal Sage Scrub (CSS)". The next sentence states there were "several mature individuals of scalebroom". Scalebroom is an indicator species for Riversidean alluvial fan sage scrub and a distinctive species between RAFSS and CSS. The report confirms this when discussing "the only dominant species that has a strong fidelity to alluvial scrub is scalebroom, which generally is regarded as an indicator of RAFSS". The vegetation within the project site is RAFSS and thus EMD recommends that both the report and the IS/MND be revised to address its impacts comprehensively, including mitigation and minimization measures to account for the loss of this habitat. 3. Page 19 of the report declares the project site's vegetation as "remnant" RAFSS; however, this does not negate that it is still a State -designated S-1.1 plant community. EMD recommends that both the report, and the IS/MND, should be revised to identify necessary mitigation measures for the project's impacts to RAFSS. We respectfully request to be included on the circulation list for all project notices, public reviews, or public hearings. In closing, I would like to thank you again for allowing the San Bernardino County Department of Public Works the opportunity to comment on the above -referenced project. Should you have any questions or need additional clarification, please contact the individuals who provided the specific comment, as listed above. Sincerely, Micel R. Perry Sup rvising Planner Environmental Managemeni MRP:PE:kj P813 June 2, 2017 Planning Department c/o Donald Granger, Senior Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Dr. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91726 Dear Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department: P814 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA JUN 12 2017 RECEIVED - PLANNING I am disheartened to learn that the proposed Day Creek Square project will permanently remove Riversidian alluvial fan sage scrub (RAFSS) from its 28.4 acre site. This RAFSS is considered by our state to be a sensitive and declining habitat that is home to a variety of native wildlife species including birds, which I particularly adore. As a result, I ask that the City of Rancho Cucamonga require DR Horton, the developer of this project, to mitigate for the loss of this RAFSS as per the conservation goals of the Rancho Cucamonga 2010 General Plan, which includes preserving "sensitive habitats" (Chapter 6, Page RC -7). An example of mitigation for the loss of RAFSS would be to require the Day Creek Square project to 1) include native alluvial fan sage scrub vegetation throughout its landscaping, and 2) extend the length of its proposed linear park to connect with the planned city bike path along the Day Creek Drainage. According torp esent plans, this 63 ft. wide parkway on the southern edge of the site will not extend to the far west edge of the project site. Such a connection between the linear park and future bike path should provide a corridor for wildlife, such as birds, between native habitat that still exists along Day Creek Drainage and any native vegetation that may be included in the parkway or other parts of the development. A more significant mitigation for the loss of this RAFSS habitat would be to require the developer to contribute to funds to help 1) restore alluvial fan sage scrub in present conservation areas, or 2) acquire proposed conservation areas that would protect alluvial fan sage scrub, or 3) do both. Present conservation areas include the North Etiwanda Preserve, and proposed conservation areas include those discussed in the Ranch Cucamonga 2010 General Plan (Chapter 6, Page RC -4). Thank you for considering the preservation of such an invaluable native plant community. Sincerely, ,zzV� vt- Grace Aguiar 1371 Bowen St. Upland, CA 91786 P815 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA JUN 132017 .lune 7, 2017 RECEIVED - PLANNING Planning/Historic Preservation Commission ATT: Donald Granger 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 01730 Dear Commissioners, As a longtime Rancho Cucamonga business owner, I Wish to C0111111uilicate my strong support 1`61- tile orthe proposed Day Creek Square Project which is tieing considered by the Commission at your June 10' meeting. The boutique hotel amenity that is provided by the Day Creek Square Project will generate needed tourism revenues to help maintain the high level of community services that Rancho Cucamonga provides to residents. This new plaster -planned mixed use neighborhood will also be very attractive for inillenials and young families who are seeking convenient walking access to shops and restaurants. It represents the high standards of planning innovation that has made Rancho Cucamonga Such a dynamic and successful community. I urge you to approve the Day Creek Square Project on June 14`x' and request that my letter of support be submitted as part of the official record. Thank you. SincerelyX.viln,,Brown, K Sr. 10844 Edison Street Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 /0, June 14, 2017 Planning Department c/o Donald Granger, Senior Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Dr. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGP- JUN 1 4 20V RECEIVED - PLANNING As an avid birder and current president of the Pomona Valley Audubon Society, I recognize that without native plant communities, we will have no native birds. That's why I was particularly disheartened to learn that the proposed Day Creek Square project will permanently remove Riversidian alluvial fan sage scrub (RAFSS) from its 28.4 acre site with no mitigation for the removal. The state of California considers RAFSS a sensitive and declining habitat that is home to a variety of native wildlife species, including birds, which deserve our protection. Therefore, I ask that the City of Rancho Cucamonga require the developer, D.R. Horton, to mitigate for the loss of this RAFSS as per the conservation goals of the Rancho Cucamonga 2010 General Plan, which includes preserving "sensitive habitats" (Chapter 6, Page RC -7). This is not about being anti -development, it's about smart development. For example, mitigation for the loss of RAFSS could be as simple as requiring the project to include native alluvial fan sage scrub vegetation throughout its landscaping, and (even smarter) to extend the length of its proposed linear park to connect with the planned city bike path along the Day Creek Drainage. Present plans show this 63 foot -wide parkway on the southern edge of the site will not extend to the far west edge of the project site. Such a connection between the linear park and firture bike path should provide a corridor for wildlife, such as birds, between native habitat that still exists along Day Creek Drainage and any native vegetation that may be included in the parkway or other parts of the development. More significant mitigation for the loss of this RAFSS habitat would be to require the D.R. Horton to contribute fiends to help 1) restore alluvial fan sage scrub in present conservation areas, or 2) acquire proposed conservation areas that would protect alluvial fan sage scrub, or 3) do both. Present conservation areas include the North Etiwanda Preserve, and proposed conservation areas include those discussed in the Ranch Cucamonga 2010 General Plan (Chapter 6, Page RC -4). Thank you for considering the preservation of such an invaluable native plant community and the wildlife that live there. Sincerely, Tina Stoner 8823 Coca Street Alta Loma, CA 91701 �e /Z) __� / 6 P816 j State of California -- Natural Resources A enc DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE Inland Deserts Region 3602 Inland Empire Boulevard, Suite C-220 Ontario, CA 91764 (909) 484-0167 www.wildlife.ca.gov June 14, 2017 Sent via email Mr. Donald Granger City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 donald.grang er( city 0frc.us P8�17 EDMUND G. BROWN JR. Governor Ile CHARLTON H. BONHAM, Director "W�wJ CUCP�DyGP Subject: Initial Study with Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration Day Creek Square Project State Clearinghouse No. 2017051019 Dear Mr. Granger: The Department of Fish and Wildlife (Department) appreciates the opportunity to comment on the Initial Study (IS) and proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for the Day Creek Square Project (project) [State Clearinghouse No. 2017051019]. The Department is responding to the IS/MND as a Trustee Agency for fish and wildlife resources (California Fish and Game Code Sections 711.7 and 1802, and the California Environmental Quality Act [CEQA] Guidelines Section 15386), and as a Responsible Agency regarding any discretionary actions (CEQA Guidelines Section 15381), such as the issuance of a Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement (California Fish and Game Code Sections 1600 et seq.) and/or a California Endangered Species Act (CESA) Permit for Incidental Take of Endangered, Threatened, and/or Candidate species (California Fish and Game Code Sections 2080 and 2080.1). The project proposes the development of 380 residential units, a hotel, and two restaurants on 28.4 acres located at the southwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino; within Assessor Parcel Number (APN): 1090-331-05. COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The Department has jurisdiction over the conservation, protection, and management of fish, wildlife, native plants, and the habitat necessary for biologically sustainable populations of those species (i.e., biological resources); and administers the Natural Community Conservation Planning Program (NCCP Program). The Department offers the comments and recommendations presented below to assist the City of Rancho Conserving CaCifonlia's Wirdlft e Since 1870 P818 Mitigated Negative Declaration Day Creek Square Project SCH No. 2017051019 Page 2 Cucamonga (City; the CEQA lead agency) in adequately identifying and/or mitigating the project's significant, or potentially significant, impacts on biological resources. Biological Resources and Impacts Following review of the IS and MND, the Department is concerned by the lack of feasible mitigation measures to avoid potentially significant impacts, and/or mitigate significant impacts to declining natural vegetation communities and species of special concern within the City of Rancho Cucamonga's sphere of influence. We offer the comments and recommendations presented below to assist the City in adequately identifying and mitigating the project's significant, or potentially significant, impacts on biological resources: Special Status Wildlife Species The IS identifies that two special -status small mammals (desert woodrat and northwestern San Diego pocket mouse) were detected during trapping surveys of the project site and that the project will remove habitat supporting these species. The IS (Page 24) also states that "...the project will remove habitat with the potential to support several...special-status reptiles, including coast horned lizard, orangethroat whiptail, rosy boa, red diamond rattlesnake, and silvery legless lizard." For both taxonomic groups the IS concludes (Page 24) that "...due to [the] relatively small size and the general isolation of the site, and the relatively low sensitivity of these species, the loss of habitat at the property would not have a substantial, adverse effect on these species. Therefore, the impacts would be less than significant and would not require mitigation..." The Department disagrees with these findings and the City's determination that impacts will be less than significant (and therefore no mitigation is required). Based on cumulative impacts within the immediate vicinity of this project site (APN 1089-031-37 [10.18 acres], and 1089-031-36 [4 acres] located north of the project site are both proposed for development), the Department considers the removal of 28.4 acres of habitat supporting these species of special concern to be a significant impact. The IS argues that loss of habitat at the property would not have a substantial, adverse effect on these species, but fails to appropriately articulate how this conclusion was r1ched, or what supporting data was used to reach this determination. Given that 100 percent of the habitat onsite will be removed to accommodate the project, how is it possible that impacts to the species of special concern found onsite will not be significant? Continuing loss of natural habitat within the City have isolated remaining populations of non-vagile species of special concern making it almost impossible for individuals to relocate out of harm's way and avoid take. The IS also appears to argue that because small mammals were detected in "low numbers," the importance of the species presence is somehow diminished. The Department finds considerable fault with this argument given that only a very small portion of the project site was trapped (the northwest corner), yet trapping yielded the presence of five small mammal species (two Mitigated Negative Declaration Day Creek Square Project SCH No. 2017051019 Page 3 of which are species of special concern) and 40 small mammals were captured (with a capture rate of approximately 4 percent). Given the continuing loss of natural habitat, and further isolation of remaining areas of natural habitat, within the City, the Department argues that any impact to natural habitat supporting species of special concern is a significant impact warranting appropriate compensatory mitigation. Alluvial Scrub Habitat The Biological Technical Report and IS fail to provide a consistent determination of the vegetation community found on site. The IS identifies that presence of scale broom (Lepidospartum squamatum) within the project site, and further states that (Page 39) "what remains onsite essentially functions as Riversidean sage scrub" despite also characterizing the vegetation as "buckwheat scrub." The Biological Technical Report also states that scalebroom is "...generally regarded as an indicator of RAFSS [Riversidean alluvial fan sage scrub]." The vegetation community found onsite is a Lepidospartum alliance, and the IS should be revised to reflect this. Scale broom scrub has an overall rarity ranking of G3 S3, with some associations within the scale broom scrub alliance (i.e., Riversidean alluvial fan sage scrub) being listed as rare as G1 S1.1. No compensatory mitigation for the loss of this habitat is provided in the CEQA document; further, the Biological Technical Report (Page 19) attempts to invalidate and/or diminish the significance of the projects' impacts to RAFSS: stating that the vegetation is "remnant." The Department considers all associations with state ranks of S1 -S3 to be highly imperiled. Further, the Department considers the removal of up to 25.48 acres of RAFSS to be a significant impact. Mitigation The Department is concerned by the cumulative impacts to Lepidospartum alliance habitat and associated species assemblages within the City's sphere of influence. Urban development has resulted in alluvial sage scrub to become eliminated or isolated to stands along streams and outwashes on major alluvial fans throughout much of Rancho Cucamonga. However, even degraded or isolated patches of alluvial scrub vegetation still retain a distinct characteristic given their relation to flood -deposited alluvia and the species associated with this habitat type. This project highlights this fact. In order to reduce the impacts to species of special concern and alluvial fan scale broom scrub to a level that is less than significant, the Department recommends that the City require the project proponent to purchase, conserve in perpetuity, and enhance/restore similar habitat within the watershed. While the amount (acreage) of habitat that is appropriate will vary based on the location of the proposed mitigation area and the amount and type of enhancement and/or restoration proposed, the proposed mitigation area should, at a minimum, support a similar diversity and abundance of species as the project site. Because of the rarity of RAFSS, the Department P819 P82O Mitigated Negative Declaration Day Creek Square Project SCH No. 2017051019 Page 4 recommends that the project be mitigated at no less than a ratio of 3:1 (compensatory mitigation acreage: impact acreage). Note that a higher ratio may be warranted if the proposed mitigation site requires little enhancement, is located far away from the project site (i.e., within a separate watershed), is not occupied by or available to special status species, and/or possesses other attributes that diminish its long-term conservation value. The Department is available to assist the City in evaluating the proposed mitigation prior to adoption of the MND. Department Conclusions and Further Coordination The Department appreciates the opportunity to comment on the IS/MND for the Day Creek Square Project (SCH No. 2017051049), and we request that the City of Rancho Cucamonga address the Department's comments and concerns prior to adoption of the MND. If you should have any questions pertaining to the comments provided in this letter, please contact Joanna Gibson at (909) 987-7449 or at joanna.gibsonCc-)-wildlife. ca.gov. Sincerely, s i Nair �` e Tonal Manager WALTON 874 N. 10th Ave. • June 14, 2017 P821 Upland, California 91786 Planning Department c/o Donald Granger, Senior Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Dr. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department: (909)949-7483 • notlaw_17 a msn.com CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA JUN 142017 RECEIVED - PlAl'lII iNC Once again, I am a local wildlife biologist who is concerned about the loss of native California vegetative communities and open space in our foothill communities. Below I am providing some supplemental comments to my original comments regarding the Day Creek Square project that I wrote on April 11, 2017. First of all, I am very pleased to hear that the plans for Day Creek Square will likely be incorporating native alluvial fan sage scrub vegetation and more native large -canopy trees, like oaks, into its landscaping plans. However, I am still asking Rancho Cucamonga to require more significant mitigation for the loss of about 24 acres of Riversidian alluvial fan sage scrub habitat (RAFSS) at this project site as per the conservation goals of the "Rancho Cucamonga (RC) 2010 General Plan" (Chapter 6, Page RC -7). As I had discussed in my previous letter, the loss of this RAFSS habitat could be significantly mitigated by requiring the developer to contribute to funds to help 1) restore/protect alluvial fan sage scrub in present conservation areas, or 2) acquire proposed conservation areas that would protect alluvial fan sage scrub, or 3) do both. Present conservation areas include the North Etiwanda Preserve, and proposed conservation areas include those discussed in the "RC 2010 General Plan" (Chapter 6, Page RC -4). I am asking for more significant mitigation because I disagree with the Initial Study's conclusion (page 40) that the Day Creek Square (DCS) project site "does not have long-term conservation value as RAFSS and loss of vegetation at this site would not have a substantial adverse effect on remaining functional RAFSS." Whether or not this RAFSS has "long-term conservation value" this habitat still hasrp esent value for the species that currently occupy it or have the potential to occupy it in the near future. The "Biological Technical Report for the DCS Project" (appendices A and B) reported over thirty native plant species, and over twenty-five reptiles, birds, and mammals that presently occupy the site. Because reported surveys were limited to just a few days, one would expect to find even more native species with additional surveys conducted on the project site. The "DCS Initial Study" (page 26) for this project even states that this RAFSS could still provide potential habitat for the coastal California gnatcatcher and burrowing owl, which are both federal and state special -status species. P822 At present, this RAFSS on the DCS project site also provides a haven and/or stepping stone for wildlife, like native birds and insects, that fly to and use native habitat throughout the region. Thus. this patch of RAFSS could be essential for the survival and long-term conservation of RAFSS, other sensitive habitats, or even agricultural crops elsewhere in our foothills that rely on such animals for seed dispersal and pollination. Secondly, I am very happy to hear that Rancho Cucamonga will be requiring pedestrian access from Day Creek Square to the planned Day Creek Bike Trail near the southwest corner of the Day Creek Square project site. However, I would still like Rancho Cucamonga to require the linear park on the south end of the project to extend entirely to the western edge of the project site for the following reasons. 1) This park extension would help prevent flooding by providing more area for the infiltration of storm water, especially since this area is close to potential overflow from the Day Creek Channel and because there are no designated open spaces for water infiltration directly up slope from this site. 2) Such a connection between the linear park and future bike path should provide a corridor for wildlife between native habitat that still exists along Day Creek Channel and any native vegetation that may be included in the parkway or other parts of the development. 3) A longer park would provide additional connectivity throughout DCS for pedestrians. 4) Lastly, extending this parkway to the west would also provide a buffer between walkers and residences for any future increase in pedestrian traffic in southwest corner of DCS after the Day Creek Bike Trail has been opened. Several Rancho Cucamonga (RC) citizens and I have questioned why the proposed linear park does not extend all the way westward to the future bike trail. RC City responded by saying that the police department believes that this southwest corner, without through traffic, will become a magnet for riffraff. I understand their concern, but the project design could be modified to allow for pedestrian through traffic in that southwest corner and, thus, minimize any safety concerns. For example, if the five houses west of the linear park were removed and replaced with park area, the entrances to the high density housing to the north could face southward toward the extended park area. Another possible idea would be to open each back patio of this high density housing with a gate to this park area so that residents have immediate access to this area and, thus, could keep a better eye out on this area. Thank you for your time and consideration, and please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. Sincerely, ',/' "" 6-1 Natasha Walton, M.S. P823 ORDINANCE NO. 914 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2016-00452, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN ZONING DESIGNATION FOR 28.4 ACRES OF LAND FROM REGIONALLY RELATED OFFICE/COMMERCIAL (RROC) TO MIXED USE (MU) IN THE VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN (VCP) RELATED TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF A MIXED USE PROJECT CONSISTING OF 380 RESIDENTIAL UNITS, A 71 ROOM HOTEL AND TWO RESTAURANT BUILDINGS TOTALING 12,000 SQUARE FEET, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD AND BASE LINE ROAD; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF —APN: 1090- 331-05. A. Recitals. 1. D. R. Horton filed an application for the approval of Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRC2016-00452 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Victoria Community Plan Amendment request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 14th day of June 2017, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing with respect to the above referenced Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRC2016-00452 and, following the conclusion thereof, adopted its Resolution No. 17-54, recommending that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopt said Victoria Community Plan Amendment. 3. On the 19th day of July 2017, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. SECTION 2: Based upon the substantial evidence presented to the City Council during the above -referenced public hearing on July 5, 2017, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, the City Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to approximately 28.4 acres of land, basically a rectangular configuration, located at the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Day Creek Boulevard, and is presently vacant. Said property is currently designated as Regionally Related Office/Commercial; and b. The property to the north of the subject site is designated Village Commercial and is currently under construction as a neighborhood shopping center. The property to the west is Attachment 6 P824 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 9** VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2016-00452 D.R. HORTON JULY 5, 2017 Page 2 designated Open Space and contains overhead electrical transmission lines and a flood control channel. The property to the east is designated Mixed Use/Village Commercial and Mixed Use Single -Family, and is developed with a neighborhood shopping center and single-family dwelling units. The property to the south is designated Mixed Use Single -Family and is developed with single-family dwelling units; and C. The amendment is consistent with the General Plan and will implement the goals of the General Plan as this location is designated Mixed Use in the General Plan. The amendment will change the zoning from Regionally Related Office/Commercial to Mixed Use and will bring the zoning of the Victoria Community Plan into vertical consistency with the General Plan and will facilitate the development of a mixed use project, thereby implementing General Plan Policy LU -2.1 which plans for vibrant, pedestrian -friendly mixed use and high density residential areas at strategic infill locations along transit routes. Accordingly, this amendment is consistent with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and d. This amendment will provide for a mixed use project that has been designed with input from the community and with a goal of protecting neighborhoods from the encroachment of incompatible activities by including the design of a linear park along the southern edge to function as a buffer to the existing neighborhood to the south, thereby implementing General Plan Land Use Policy LU -1.1 by minimizing negative impacts on the residential living environment. Accordingly, the amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and e. The amendment will provide for a mixed use project that will have detached single- family condos and attached single-family rowhomes in a location that is compatible with the adjacent residential area. The mixed use project has the single-family detached condos located in the southern area of the project, nearest the existing single-family neighborhood in order to provide a transition of density and be of compatible scale, thereby being consistent with General Plan Land Use Policy LU -1.6 which encourages small lot detached dwelling units to locate in areas where it will be compatible with adjacent neighborhoods. Accordingly, this amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. SECTION 3: Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above -referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed Victoria Community Plan Amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for the development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development. The amendment will provide for a mixed use project that will have detached single-family condos and attached single- family rowhomes in a location that is compatible with the adjacent residential area. The mixed use project has single-family detached condos located in the southern area of the project, nearest the existing single-family neighborhood in order to provide a transition of density and be of compatible scale, thereby being consistent with General Plan Land Use Policy LU -1.6 which encourages small lot detached dwelling units to locate in areas where it will be compatible with adjacent neighborhoods. Accordingly, this amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and P825 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 9** VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2016-00452 D.R. NORTON JULY 5, 2017 Page 3 b. The proposed Victoria Community Plan Amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Victoria Community Plan which in turn are consistent with and implement the goals and objectives of the General Plan. These goals include promoting the economical and efficient use of land, promoting design and construction techniques that are responsive to the environment, and promoting development compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. The proposed amendment will change the zoning from Regionally Related Office/Commercial to Mixed Use and will bring the zoning of the Victoria Community Plan into vertical consistency with the General Plan and will facilitate the development of a mixed use project, thereby implementing General Plan Policy LU -2.1 which plans for vibrant, pedestrian -friendly mixed use and high density residential areas at strategic infill locations along transit routes; and c. The proposed Victoria Community Plan Amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. This amendment will provide for a mixed use project that has been designed with input from the community and with a goal of protecting neighborhoods from the encroachment of incompatible activities by including the design of linear park along the southern edge to function as a bufferto the existing neighborhood to the south, thereby implementing General Plan Land Use Policy LU -1.1 by minimizing negative impacts on the residential living environment. SECTION 4: Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The City Council has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and the comments received from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The City Council finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the City Council. Based on these findings, the City Council hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. C. The City Council has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The City Council therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project; and P826 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 9** VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2016-00452 D.R. NORTON JULY 5, 2017 Page 4 d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the City Council's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. SECTION 5: The Victoria Community Plan is hereby amended to change the Victoria Community Plan Zoning Designation from Regionally Related Office Commercial (RROC) to Mixed Use (MU) for 28.4 acres of land located at the southwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road, APN: 1090-391-05, as shown in Exhibit A. SECTION 6: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this Ordinance is, for any reason, deemed or held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, or preempted by legislative enactment, such decision or legislation shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or words thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, clauses, phrases, or words might subsequently be declared invalid or unconstitutional or preempted by subsequent legislation. SECTION 7: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published within 15 days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. �0� ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: 1090-331-05 TOTAL ACREAGE: 28.44 ACRES EXISTING ZONING: REGIONALLY RELATED OFFICE / COMMERCIAL P A r1 /11 r' EXHIBIT A F;Z* : BASE L=INE -ROAD' o N II 4i J V ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: a 1090-331-05 TOTAL ACREAGE: m 28.44 ACRES O PROPOSED ZONING: m MIXED USE w w v o 'I . i 0 I' I I 9 I Du NEI- u WMADOLE9302 PUSSURGH A SURE 230 RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CA. 9930 PHONE 909.481.8322 awneff* Co mr oida for L& FAX: 909.48L8320 I I Y y -17 P1 Ti I ,a—-- �� r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Project Overview • Applicant: DR Horton, Inc. • Project Summary: Mixed use project consisting 380 residential units, a 71 room hotel and two restaurant buildings totaling 12,000 square feet. • Project Size: 28.4 acres of Land • General Plan Designation: Mixed Use (MU) • Zoning: Regionally Related Office/Commercial (Victoria Community Plan) • Density: 15.3 dwelling units per acre Project Site YVI 9 ri ��.CL tz Lu > L; CIVCh6 3NI-I -ZSV� . . . . . . . . Li JOL .-M f -- --� Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRC2016=00452 • History/Background: • Victoria Community Plan: • Victoria Community Plan was adopted in 1981 and Mixed Use not included as a land use category • Initial land use designation: The site would be a logical location for retail near the regional mall • Current Designation: Regionally Related Office Commercial • General Plan: • Site was designated for Mixed Use starting with 2001 General Plan adoption • Evaluated and remained Mixed Use in the 2010 General Plan adoption Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRC2016=00452 Zone change will implement the goals and objectives of the General Plan: • Vertical consistency with the current General Plan • Implement Land Use Policy Goal LU -1.1: Project has been designed to be compatible with surrounding development through site planning and density transition • Implement Land Use Policy Goal LU -1.6: Project incorporates small detached and attached housing product in a manner that is complimentary to existing development • Implement Land Use Policy Goal LU -2.1: Project is designed as mixed use project that offers pedestrian and trail connections, and proximity to transit routes • Implement Land Use Policy Goal LU -2.2: Project is designed for autos and pedestrians and provides connection opportunities to bike trails Project Design • Overarching goal: Mixed Use project that is unique with higher density that provides interconnectivity and walkable connections • Use of paseos, social nodes and gathering areas of different design and scale • Primary plaza in the residential area features raised stage, seat walls and outdoor area that can host various community events. • Plaza at the corner of Day Creek and Base Line features outdoor seating with shade, decorative paving, overhead trellis and a central fountain. Site Plan --AAA ----------- , Gi�j I .60 'A �� t'Ott --- T___ -------------------- '044 440. -L -------- 74 '04(jo T mm - - ------- f 4,4 -i 1 04 In ft I .60 'A �� t'Ott --- T___ -------------------- &to40 Ak fr. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA i [0 [: #'OR CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA d 1 :[•[: lid �1�\� :qi Lo -m CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUM PEI r 7 ni '-_ilk { 1 r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA w a K v I w 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA w,gm_NR1lWTM C� Ld L' t u ------------- Vp '1\1� `\\lry + ilt � .��� �� ■' .`1111 ~1f1 9 1 Ir} t J, �` �" BAR - - - � i ■. � .. ' �k .-f; ?� .. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Community Meetings • Revisions made in response to community input: • Lowering of unit count from 392 to 380 • Reduction of units directly along southern edge • Units along southern edge re -plotted from side on to rear on • Design and inclusion of linear park • Reduction in massing of rowhomes along Day Creek • Landscape palette: native plants and tree palette changes Linear Park • Linear Park • Accessible to public but privately maintained • Open turf areas for low intensity activities (badminton, frisbee, volleyball) • Bocce ball, shaded areas with game tables • Park plan reviewed by Police and will have cameras that connect to PVSN Alb I EMERGENCY ACCESS GATES v.e I •n x PIDUFMAM RI.AJAKINIfYv.S AMW, niue_ aooce COiRT➢ w.mHlCJf 96Ri2ro i... jW . . . . . . r/ JW ------------------------------ C!6 H.O.A. PARK. RWITIA!WVLMKnMWRI!TwAAIk— �� PgJ3fSfRLkN 61X['177 KIWI ��NIG5]lSOE SfRUGYlIR6 N'�GAFE ------------- iAB668 0P6H Tkj%V PtAV MRK en'RY M[IHI lmiHRo MAiil3 RRAYIFx' I F'_vfRY PQM yrs MOMLIMI'H I • 9ALWHM H e Va. I. E YRALI. 11 MAY OEHL'Hff 1 —\ ______i__i_��i__`_A6LillTIT ExIsnH[I -------- ®1 RYW ' NHKi[L�L{DRAY M1'E ➢COLIC ------------------------ i AMIH[ICw1'I:'"I'll": iILU1F Parking of Number Code Standard Bedrooms of Units Required Covered Parking Total Required Parking Spaces Total Provided SpacesNumber . Two Bedroom 2 Spaces/Unit Units 94 1 Gara e or Car ort 94 spaces 18$ 188 Three Bedroom 2 Spaces/Unit Units 235 (2 in Garage or Carport) 235 470 470 Single Family 51 2 Car Garage 102 spaces 102 102 Guest Parking 235 1 per 3 units 127 142 Subtotal: Residential Parking 887 902 Surplus +15 Hotel (71 rooms) 73 73 Two Restaurants (12,000 sq. ft total) 120 120 Subtotal: Commercial 193 193 Surplus/deficit 0 Totals 1,080 1,095 Surplus/deficit +15 Shared Parking ExHiBiT 1: SHAFLILL) PARKING MAP RESTa LJRANT 2- u �� X X —rr .- ` XX4' �` :'� v RF—S—TAURAN7 1 MEN: 3 = POTENTIAL SHARED PARKING STALLS 1R' PARKING L S ;DOUBLE P 'PEf) I -i YP. I CEQA: Biological Impacts Legend Project —day Buek,.neat SeeuS CISIWa2(F ay�wt>� $G�+$ - Qisdrf4edlOevefoped fnf 1. r 4w.r155w V.11— U e i�LlNN WKQS A4VJ[ JAI" 0 0 Fiscal Impact Analysis Scenario 1: No zone change, and developing the existing zoning, floor area Ratios with a 163,350 commercial use and 392,000 square feet of office use. site under the square feet of • For Scenario 1, it is estimated that a proposed retail/office project would generate $788,000 in annual reoccurring revenue, and $334,000 in reoccurring costs, resulting in a net fiscal positive impact to the City of $454,000. Scenario 2: Proposed mixed use project by DR Horton. • For Scenario 2, it is estimated that the proposed mixed use project would generate $691,000 in annual reoccurring revenue, and $215,000 in reoccurring costs, resulting in a net fiscal positive impact to the City of $476,000. Planning Commission Hearing: June 14, 2017 Planning Commission approved the applications (Design Review, Parcel Map, Use Permit) contingent upon the following 1. Adoption of Mitigated Negative Declaration related development Tract Map, Conditional Citv Council actions: 2. Approval of the Victoria Community Plan Amendment Conclusion and Recommended Actions Planning Commission and staff recommend that the City Council take the following actions: 1. Adopt a Mitigated Negative impacts Declaration of environmental 2. Approve Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRC2016- 00452 LETTER RECEIVED AT CITY COUNCIL 07.19.17 MEETING IN REGARDS TO ITEM J2 Wednesday July, 19, 2017 RE: Public Hearing Item J2 on Tonight's Agenda Dear City Council Members, The Mixed Use development being proposed by DR Horton for the Southwest corner of Base Line Rd and Day Creek Blvd aims to squeeze 380 condos/townhomes, a 71 room hotel, and 2 restaurants onto 28 acres. This level of unit density is not only inconsistent with the surrounding area, it's irresponsible. The project, according to the most recent plan does not have adequate parking stalls (using rational math) which will force residents to park in the neighboring streets and commercial parking lots. This already occurs with the condo community to the south of this project and the problem will only get worse. Additionally, this obscene density will also unnecessarily add to the burden that is already on our overcrowded schools. As a resident of the immediate surrounding area and potential buyer, I am happy to see new development, but this project in it's current form is flawed. All of that said, I know there is little I can say to convince you all to delay this project to give it the time it needs to be refined with public input, but please consider how some simple and creative changes could address these problems. urge you to please look into the viability of requiring this development to allocate 20-30% of the residential units to senior housing (ages 55+). This small change will significantly address the issues described above. Generally speaking, seniors drive less, have fewer cars, contribute less to crime and have fewer children living with them. Regards, Benjamin Cutler 12347 Claredon Dr Unit 3 Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 (909) 258-9220 LETTER RECEIVED IN REGARDS TO CITY COUNCIL MEETING 7/19/17: ITEM J2 Granger, Donald From: NATASHA WALTON <notlaw_17@msn.com> Sent: Monday, July 17, 2017 10:04 PM To: City Council Cc: Granger, Donald Subject: Day Creek Square Comments Dear Mayor Michael and Councilmembers: Please pay special attention to the comments regarding the loss of native habitat and/or open space regarding the Day Creek Square project that you will be voting on this Wednesday, July 19th. These concerns have been brought up by local foothill residents as well as the San Bernardino Co. Department of Public Works and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). Although the developer's biological consultants have now claimed that the Riversidian alluvial fan sage scrub (RAFSS) on the DCS project site no longer qualifies as such, this native vegetation would still be considered a coastal sage scrub community. Although coastal sage scrub (CSS) is not as rare as RAFSS, it still warrants concern for conservation due to its increasing loss in our region. In fact, the CDFW guidelines* for preserving CSS in natural community conservation plans include providing "adequate mitigation" for even "low value" CSS.* I encourage the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department to contact the CDFW for guidance on mitigating for this loss of CSS before the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council approves this project and other ones like it. *Southern California Coastal Sage Scrub NCCP Process Guidelines (1993): https://nrnl.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandIer.ashx?DocLiment1D=15549 Sincerely, Natasha Walton, M.S. Upland, CA P829 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 19, 2017 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager A INITIATED BY: Candyce Burnett, City Planner r Desiree Lawson, Planning Technician SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE FEDERALLY REQUIRED FY2017/2018 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN, WHICH INCLUDES THE SECTION OF CDBG FUNDED ACTIVITES, BASED ON A GRANT ALLOCATION OF $849,028 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council conduct a public hearing, take public testimony regarding the application for funding, and adopt the Annual Action Plan, thereby authorizing the Mayor to submit the plan to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for their consideration. BACKGROUND: Since the adoption of the Cranston -Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act in 1990, the Federal Government has required jurisdictions to develop a comprehensive long-range planning format to address the use of entitlement funds, such as the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program. The primary focus of these planning efforts is to benefit low- and moderate - income individuals and families, homelessness, low-income target areas, and other special needs populations. HUD administers the CDBG program and requires the preparation of a 5 -year Consolidated Plan and a 1 -year Annual Action Plan. The Consolidated Plan identifies housing and community development needs, outlines strategies and proposes actions to address identified needs and presents first-year activities in the form of the Annual Action Plan. The 2015-2019 Consolidated Plan was adopted on May 6, 2015. and covers the program years from July 1, 2015 to June 30, 2020, and this 2017/2018 Annual Action Plan will cover the program year from July 1, 2017 to June 30, 2018. ANALYSIS: CDBG funds are provided by HUD based on a formula that considers a City's low-income census data, the extent of poverty, and age of the housing stock. Based upon this formula, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive a grant allocation of $849,049 in FY2017/2018, which represents an increase of $31,810 (3.9%) from 2016/2017 funding. To be eligible for CDBG funding, each proposed activity must meet the following requirements: Page 1 of 4 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CDBG ANNUAL ACTION PLAN JULY 19, 2017 Page 2 P830 Each proposed activity must meet one of the following two primary goals of the CDBG program: 1) the development of viable urban communities, including decent housing, and a suitable living environment; or 2) the expansion of economic opportunities, principally for persons of low- and moderate -income. • Each proposed activity must meet a CDBG National Objective that either benefits low- and moderate- income residents, eliminates conditions of slum and blight, or meets a particular urgent need. • Each proposed activity must be eligible under CDBG guidelines. CDBG guidelines require that at least 70 percent of all funds be utilized on activities that benefit low- and moderate- income persons. Of the City's activities proposed for the 2017/2018 program year, approximately 80 percent will benefit persons of low- and moderate- income. An Annual Action Plan (AAP) identifies how Federal funds will be used during a program year; it sets accomplishment goals for each activity and a time frame to complete them. The AAP proposes activities within the following areas: Administration, Capital Improvement, Home Improvement, Public Service, and Historic Preservation. All of the proposed activities meet a CDBG National Objective, comply with the CDBG guidelines, and are included in the City's Consolidated Plan. The draft 2017/2018 AAP (Attachment 1) contains funding recommendations for the allocation of entitlement funds for FY 2017/2018. These recommendations directly correspond to the community needs identified in the Priority Needs Assessment (Attachment 2). The amounts shown below are the recommended funding amounts in the AAP, including the use of current allocation and reprogrammed funds: Administration: Under Federal regulations, cities may allocate up to 20 percent of their entitlement allocation to fund CDBG program administration. • CDBG Administration: Administration and program management to ensure the efficient and effective use of Federal funds. Staff recommends funding this activity $161,000. • Fair Housing: This activity supports HUD's mission to promote non-discrimination and ensure fair and equal housing opportunities. Staff recommends funding this activity $8,800. Capital Improvement: Includes funds to public facilities and for public improvements. Wheelchair Ramps: Retrofitting of existing intersection curbs city-wide to comply with ADA standards. Staff recommends funding this activity $22,850. Sidewalk Grinding and Replacement: The grinding, repair, or replacement of damaged and/or inaccessible sidewalks located in low-income targeted neighborhoods. Staff recommends funding this activity $22,850. Le Grande Street Improvements: Design and construct public street improvements along Le Grande Street from Hellman Avenue to Amethyst Avenue, approximately 1300 linear feet, to include curbs, gutters, asphalt, sidewalk, driveway, street lights, street trees and ramps for the disabled. Staff recommends funding this activity $45,000. (The project total Page 2 of 4 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CDBG ANNUAL ACTION PLAN JULY 19, 2017 Page 3 P831 is $853,000, we are recommending the beginning funds to be combined with future allocations). Home Improvement: The City's Home Improvement Program offers zero interest, deferred payment loans up to $30,000, and grants up to $7,500 for eligible low-income, owner -occupied, single-family or mobile homes. This program has been extremely successful and we have received a significant number of requests for assistance from both the single-family and mobile - home community. Staff recommends funding this activity $411,000. Public Service: Under CDBG regulations, cities may allocate up to 15 percent of their entitlement to fund public service providers. Fifteen percent of our anticipated entitlement is $127,300. Proposed funding will support most of those sub -recipients who currently receive funding through the City's CDBG program. This year we are recommending funding to support renewals for 2017/2018 programs including: Graffiti Removal, Landlord Tenant Counseling, Homelessness and Food Assistance, Domestic Violence Shelter, Senior, Youth At -Risk, and Literacy programs. Staff recommends funding these activities $127,300. Historic Preservation: This activity supports the preservation and historic restoration of the Etiwanda Pacific Electric Depot. The project includes securing the facility with new doors and windows, and providing water service to the property to accommodate a restroom. Staff recommends funding this activity $459,000. ($50, 000 from the FY17118 allocation will be added to the reserved funds from FY14115, 15116, and 16117). The majority of these funds have been rolled over from previously funded years to accommodate the cost of the restoration. Beginning stages of renovation are scheduled to being in 2017/2018 program year. Upon approval of the draft 2017/2018 AAP, staff will prepare the final 2017/2018 Annual Action Plan (including the Application for Federal Assistance (SF -424) and CDBG Certifications) based on proposed funding allocations and submit the Annual Action Plan to HUD by August 16, 2017. Staff requests the ability to give the City Planner authorization to make administrative corrections to the Annual Action Plan, if needed following the Public Hearing for this report. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION: HUD emphasizes public participation in the development of the Consolidated Plan at significant points in the process. Cities are required to make every effort to involve the community in the Consolidated Plan's development process, particularly those individuals that the Consolidated Plan strives to assist, including low- and moderate- income individuals and families, the homeless, and others with special needs. Rancho Cucamonga's 2015-2019 Consolidated Plan established a 30 -day public review period prior to the adoption of the Consolidated Plan on May 6, 2015. The public notice for the 2017/2018 Annual Action Plan was published on July 3, 2017, identifying that the Annual Action Plan was available for public review and that the review period would run from Monday, July 3, 2017, through Tuesday, July 18, 2017. As of the date of this staff report, no public comments were received. CORRESPONDENCE: Notice of the public hearing and proposed funding allocations was published in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin on July 3, 2017. Page 3 of 4 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CDBG ANNUAL ACTION PLAN JULY 19, 2017 Page 4 FISCAL IMPACT: P832 The Community Development Block Grant is an annual Federal Grant received by the City. The City's FY 2017/18 Adopted Budget reflected an anticipated 5% reduction in funding; however, final Federal allocations were announced in mid-June which included an increase of 3.9% for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Staff is requesting an additional appropriation in the amount of $72,500 for both grant revenue and program expenditures for FY 2017/18. This number reflects the difference between the funding included in the FY 2017/18 Adopted Budget and the actual Federal funding announced in mid-June. The additional appropriations are requested for the following accounts: • 1204000-4740 Grant Income $72,500 • 1204314-5650/1228204-0 CDBG Administration (20% cap restrictions) $14,600 • 1204314-5650/XXXX204-0 Public Services -Various (15% cap restrictions) $10,900 • 1204314-5650/1965204-0 La Grande St: Hellman -Amethyst $45,000 • 1204314-5650/1230204-0 Home Improvement Program $2,000 COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Not Applicable ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 — 2017-2018 Annual Action Plan Attachment 2 — 2015-2019 Priority Needs Assessment Page 4 of 4 P833 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM 2017-2018 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN Annual Action Plan FY2017/2018 City of Rancho Cucamonga JULY 19, 2017 Prepared by: Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 ATTACHMENT 1 P834 TABLE OF CONTENTS AP -05 Executive Summary — 24 CFR 91.200(c), 91.220(b)..................................................... 3 PR -05 Lead & Responsible Agencies — 91.200(b).................................................................. 5 AP -10 Consultation — 91.100, 91.200(b), 91.215(I).................................................................. 6 AP -12 Participation — 91.105, 91.200(c).................................................................................10 AP -15 Expected Resources — 91.220(c) (1, 2).......................................................................11 AP -20 Annual Goals and Objectives — 91.420, 91.220(c)(3)&(e)..........................................13 AP -35 Projects — 91.220(d).....................................................................................................15 AP -38 Project Summary .........................................................................................................16 AP -50 Geographic Distribution — 91.220(f)........................................................................... 26 AP -55 Affordable Housing — 91.220(g).................................................................................. 26 AP -60 Public Housing -91.220(h)........................................................................................... 27 AP -65 Homeless and Other Special Needs Activities — 91.220(i) ........................................ 28 AP -75 Barriers to affordable housing — 91.2200)................................................................. 29 AP -85 Other Actions — 91.220(k)............................................................................................ 31 AP -90 Program Specific Requirements — 91.220(1)(1,2,4).................................................... 32 CERTIFICATIONS...................................................................................................................... 36 LIST OF TABLES TABLE 1 — RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES 5 TABLE 2 — AGENCIES, GROUPS, ORGANIZATIONS WHO PARTICIPATE 7 TABLE 3 — OTHER LOCAL/REGIONAL/FEDERAL PLANNING EFFORTS 10 TABLE 4 — CITIZEN PARTICIPATION OUTREACH 11 TABLE 5 — EXPECTED RESOURCES — PRIORITY TABLE 12 TABLE 6 — GOAL SUMMARY 13 TABLE 7 — GOAL DESCRIPTION 14 TABLE 8 — PROJECT INFORMATION 15 TABLE 9 — PROJECT SUMMARY 16 TABLE 10 - GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION 26 TABLE 11 — ONE YEAR GOALS FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING BY SUPPORT REQUIREMENT 26 TABLE 12 — ONE YEAR GOALS FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING BY SUPPORT TYPE 26 Annual Action Plan FY2017/2018 City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 P835 AP -05 Executive Summary — 24 CFR 91.200(c), 91.220(b) 1. Introduction The City of Rancho Cucamonga is an entitlement community under the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development's (HUD) Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program. As an entitlement community, the City is required to prepare a five-year Consolidated Plan in order to implement any federal programs that fund housing, community development and economic development within the community. The City of Rancho Cucamonga's Consolidated Plan covers the period from 2015-2019 (July 1, 2015 through June 30, 2020). The Strategic Plan is a key component of the Consolidated Plan in that it combines an inventory of resources available to meet the City's housing and community development needs, with long-range measurable goals. The 1-yearAction Plan, an annual component of the Consolidated Plan, outlines specific targets and identifies available resources that will be committed to various programs for implementation during the upcoming program year. The following objectives identify a strategic listing of priorities for both housing and community development activities. Each set of priorities was developed in response to specific issues identified in the Consolidated Plans Needs Assessment. 2. Summarize the objectives and outcomes identified in the Plan The Consolidated Plan provides a framework to address the needs of the City over the next five-year period using Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds. The three overarching objectives guiding the proposed activities are: - Providing Decent Affordable Housing • Creating Suitable Living Environments • Creating Economic Opportunities Outcomes show how programs and activities benefit a community or the people served. The three outcomes that will illustrate the benefits of each activity funded by the CDBG program are: • Improve Availability/Accessibility • Improve Affordability • Improve Sustainability All future activities funded through the Consolidated Plan/Annual Action Plan will support at least one objective and one outcome. The City's framework for realizing the objectives and outcomes is identified in the City's Priority Needs Assessment. 3. Evaluation of past performance The City of Rancho Cucamonga completed the 2015-2019 Consolidated Plan and it's available for review. The City has been successful in furthering the priorities, strategies, and objectives put forth within that Consolidated Plan for the City's CDBG Program. Specific information on the City's performance can be found within the Consolidated Annual Performance Evaluation Reports (CAPER's) for 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2016, which are available on City's website at: http://www.cityofrc.us/cityhall/planning/cdbg.asp. Annual Action Plan FY2017/2018 City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 P836 4. Summary of Citizen Participation Process and consultation process HUD emphasizes public participation and consultation in the development of the City's 2015-2019 Consolidated Plan through citizen participation at significant points in the process. Cities are required to make every effort to involve the community in the Consolidated Plan's development process, particularly those individuals that the Consolidated Plan strives to assist, including low and moderate income individuals and families, the homeless, and others with special needs. Federal laws relating to CDBG funds require cities to provide citizens with specific information about the amount of monies expected for the program and the range of activities that may be undertaken with those funds. Federal regulations also require a jurisdiction to hold at least two (2) public hearings throughout the program year and in order to obtain the views of citizens on housing and community development needs, including priority non -housing community development needs. One (1) of these hearings must be held before the proposed Consolidated Plan is published for comment. • To obtain input from the community, staff solicited input from various stakeholder organizations, public service providers, and City departments. A public meeting was held on Monday, February 23, 2015, and those in attendance provided information regarding their current program needs and projected needs over the next five years. The City also distributed a survey to various Stakeholder organizations, including public service providers and City departments, requesting information regarding projected changes in their service population and anticipated funding needs over the next five years, as well as providing a general discussion of program goals. • Meeting participants and survey respondents projected an increase in their service population and either maintained or projected increases in their need for additional funding. In general, comments can be summarized as projected increases in their service population, changing demographics impacting service programs, changes in funding sources, and increased competitiveness for funding. Specific needs that were identified include senior services and facilities; youth programs such as after-school programs; transitional, affordable, and supportive housing and housing services for senior veterans and very low income and homeless individuals and families; and preventing homelessness such as offering financial literacy programs, where possible. • On Wednesday, April 1, 2015, the City Council conducted a public hearing and provide input on the Preliminary Priority Needs Assessment to be used in the preparation of the 2015-2019 Consolidated Plan and the preliminary annual funding recommendations for the 2015-2016 Annual Action Plan. • Following the City Council public hearing on April 1, 2015, the draft 2015-2019 Consolidated Plan and 2015-2016 Annual Action Plan was published on the City website on Thursday, April 2, 2015. The draft Consolidated Plan and Annual Action Plan were available for a 30 -day public review and comment period beginning on Monday, April 6, 2015, and ending on Wednesday, May 6, 2015. • On July 19, 2017, the City Council conducted a public hearing to provide input for the 2017/2018 Annual Action Plan. Annual Action Plan FY2017/2018 City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 P837 5. Summary of public comments Comments will be inserted following the Public Comment Period and noted with the final 2017/2018 Annual Action Plan. 6. Summary of comments or views not accepted and the reasons for not accepting them Pursuant to 24 CFR Part 91.105 (b), the City will accept and record all public comments pertaining to the draft 2017/2018 Annual Action Plan that are received during the posted public comment period or submitted during the public hearing. Comments will be inserted following the Public Comment Period noted within the final 2017/2018 Annual Action Plan. 7. Summary The City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department is lead agency and responsible for the development and implementation of the 2015-2019 Consolidated Plan and the 2017/2018 Annual Action Plan. PR -05 Lead & Responsible Agencies — 91.200(b) 1. Agency/entity responsible for preparing/administering the Consolidated Plan Describe the agency/entity responsible for preparing the Consolidated Plan and those responsible for administration of each grant program and funding source. TABLE 1- RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES Agency Role Name Department/Agency CDBG Administrator Planning Department Narrative The lead agency responsible for the development of the Consolidated Plan is the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. Consolidated Plan Public Contact Information Desiree Lawson City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 desiree.lawson@cityofrc.us Annual Action Plan FY2017/2018 City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 P838 AP -10 Consultation — 91.100, 91.200(b), 91.215(1) 1. Introduction The Consolidated Plan represents both an application to HUD for entitlement funds under CDBG entitlement program as well as a housing and community development policy and planning document. As part of the 2015-2019 Consolidated Plan development process, the City undertook an extensive outreach program to consult and coordinate with various departments, housing and community service providers, other jurisdictions, and other entities with a potential interest in or knowledge of the City's housing and non -housing community development needs. The following sections discuss the methods by which the City consulted with service providers, in addition, to how staff that developed and followed this citizen participation process emphasized the participation of persons of low- and moderate -income. Provide a concise summary of the jurisdiction's activities to enhance coordination between public and assisted housing providers and private and governmental health, mental health and service agencies (91.215(1)) The outreach to various agencies and organizations, the City compiled an outreach list consisting different agencies, including: • Nonprofit service providers that cater to the needs of low- and moderate -income households and persons with special needs, including persons with disabilities; • Affordable housing providers; • Housing advocates; • Housing professionals; • Public agencies (Engineering Services Department); • Economic development and employment organizations; and • Community and neighborhood groups. These agencies were mailed notices of the City's Consolidated Plan process and public meetings. Specific agencies were also contacted to obtain data in preparation of this Consolidated Plan. For example, the State Developmental Services Department and State Social Services Department were contacted to obtain data and housing resources for persons with disabilities. The Housing Authority of the County of San Bernardino was also contacted to obtain information on public housing and Housing Choice Vouchers available to City residents. Describe coordination with the Continuum of Care and efforts to address the needs of homeless persons (particularly chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans, and unaccompanied youth) and persons at risk of homelessness. The Continuum of Care Strategy was consulted to provide information on homelessness and resources available in Rancho Cucamonga. Several agencies that provide housing and supportive services for the homeless and those at risk of becoming homeless attended a Stakeholders meeting, used to establish the City's Priority Needs prior to the development of the Consolidated Plan. Stakeholders included Foothill Family Shelter, Family Services Association, House of Ruth, Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board, and Inland Valley Council of Churches. Annual Action Plan FY2017/2018 City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 P839 Describe consultation with the Continuum(s) of Care that serves the jurisdiction's area in determining how to allocate ESG funds, develop performance standards for and evaluate outcomes of projects and activities assisted by ESG funds, and develop funding, policies and procedures for the operation and administration of HMIS The City of Rancho Cucamonga does not receive ESG funds. 2. Describe Agencies, groups, organizations, and others who participate in the process and describe the jurisdiction's consultations with housing, social service agencies and other entities TABLE 2 -AGENCIES, GROUPS, ORGANIZATIONS WHO PARTICIPATE 1 I Agency/Group/Organization CAMP FIRE USA Agency/Group/Organization Type Services -Children What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Briefly describe how the Agency/Group/Organization was consulted. What are the anticipated outcomes of the consultation or areas for improved coordination? 2 1 Agency/Group/Organization Non -Homeless Special Needs Public outreach was conducted. A Stakeholders meeting was held on February 23, 2015 and attended by the Organization, and a Priority Needs survey was i completed. Organization submitted an application under the Annual Action Plan. Based on a Priority Needs i Assessment, and the application submitted, the services provided by this organization are rated a High (H) need and will be a funding priority under this Consolidated Plan. Family Services Association LAency/Group/Organization Type I Services -Elderly Persons What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Briefly describe how the Agency/Group/Organization was consulted What are the anticipated outcomes of the consultation or areas for improved coordination? Non -Homeless Special Needs Public outreach was conducted. A Stakeholders meeting was held on February 23, 2015 and attended by the Organization, and a Priority Needs survey was completed. Organization submitted an application under the Annual Action Plan. Based on a Priority Needs Assessment, and the application submitted, the services provided by this organization are rated a High (H) need and will be a funding priority under this Consolidated Plan. Annual Action Plan FY2017/2018 City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 P840 3 Agency/Group/Organization Foothill Family Shelter Agency/Group/Organization Type Housing Services - Housing Services -Children Services -Elderly Persons Services -homeless What section of the Plan was addressed by Housing Need Assessment Consultation? Homeless Needs - Families with children Homelessness Needs - Veterans Homelessness Strategy Briefly describe how the Public outreach was conducted. A Stakeholders meeting Agency/Group/Organization was consulted. was held on February 23, 2015 and attended by the What are the anticipated outcomes of the Organization, and a Priority Needs survey was consultation or areas for improved completed. Organization submitted an application under coordination? the Annual Action Plan. Based on a Priority Needs Assessment, and the application submitted, the services provided by this organization are rated a High (H) need and will be a funding priority under this Consolidated Plan. 4 Agency/Group/Organization HOUSE OF RUTH Agency/Group/Organization Type Services - Housing Services -Victims of Domestic Violence Services -Health Services -Education Services - Victims Non -Homeless Special Needs What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Briefly describe how the Public outreach was conducted. A Stakeholders meeting Agency/Group/Organization was consulted. was held on February 23, 2015 and attended by the What are the anticipated outcomes of the Organization, and a Priority Needs survey was consultation or areas for improved completed. Organization submitted an application under coordination? the Annual Action Plan. Based on a Priority Needs Assessment, and the application submitted, the services provided by this organization are rated a High (H) need and will be a funding priority under this Consolidated Plan. 5 Agency/Group/Organization Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board Agency/Group/Organization Type Services -Education Service -Fair Housing Services - Landlord Tenant Counseling Annual Action Plan FY2017/2018 City of Rancho Cucamonga P841 Identify any Agency Types not consulted and provide rationale for not consulting The City attempted to invite and consult with many agency types involved in housing, homelessness, and non -housing community development activities. There was no decision to exclude any specific group. All parties were also invited to submit information and data directly to the City for inclusion in the Consolidated Plan. No organizations or individuals were deliberately omitted from the process. Other local/regional/state/federal planning efforts considered when preparing the Plan Annual Action Plan FY2017/2018 City of Rancho Cucamonga What section of the Plan was addressed by Non -Homeless Special Needs Consultation? Briefly describe how the Public outreach was conducted. A Stakeholders meeting Agency/Group/Organization was consulted. was held on February 23, 2015 and attended by the What are the anticipated outcomes of the Organization, and a Priority Needs survey was consultation or areas for improved completed. Organization submitted an application under coordination? the Annual Action Plan. Based on a Priority Needs Assessment, and the application submitted, the services provided by this organization are rated a High (H) need and will be a funding priority under this Consolidated Plan. 6 Agency/Group/Organization Inland Valley Council of Churches Agency/Group/Organization Type Services - Housing Services -homeless Food Bank What section of the Plan was addressed by Housing Need Assessment Consultation? Homeless Needs - Families with children Homelessness Needs - Veterans Briefly describe how the Public outreach was conducted. A Stakeholders meeting Agency/Group/Organization was consulted. was held on February 23, 2015 and attended by the What are the anticipated outcomes of the Organization, and a Priority Needs survey was consultation or areas for improved completed. Organization submitted an application under coordination? the Annual Action Plan. Based on a Priority Needs Assessment, and the application submitted, the services provided by this organization are rated a High (H) need and will be a funding priority under this Consolidated Plan. Identify any Agency Types not consulted and provide rationale for not consulting The City attempted to invite and consult with many agency types involved in housing, homelessness, and non -housing community development activities. There was no decision to exclude any specific group. All parties were also invited to submit information and data directly to the City for inclusion in the Consolidated Plan. No organizations or individuals were deliberately omitted from the process. Other local/regional/state/federal planning efforts considered when preparing the Plan Annual Action Plan FY2017/2018 City of Rancho Cucamonga P842 TABLE 3 - OTHER LOCAL/REGIONAL/FEDERAL PLANNING EFFORTS Name of Plan Lead Organization How do the goals of your Strategic Plan overlap with the goals of each plan? Continuum of Housing Authority HACSB administers housing opportunities and resources of the County of Care San Bernardino throughout San Bernardino County. The County Economic Development Agency, Community County HOME San Bernardino Development/Housing, administers the HOME Consortium Consortium County with the purpose of undertaking HOME -eligible housing assistance activities including acquiring, rehabilitating, and constructing affordable housing. AP -12 Participation — 91.105, 91.200(c) 1. Summary of citizen process/efforts made to broaden citizen participation HUD emphasizes public participation in the development of the Consolidated Plan through citizen participation at significant points in the process. Cities are required to make every effort to involve the community in the Consolidated Plan's development process, particularly those individuals that the Consolidated Plan strives to assist, including low- and moderate -income individuals and families, the homeless, and others with special needs. Federal laws relating to CDBG funds require cities to provide citizens with specific information about the amount of monies expected for the program and the range of activities that may be undertaken with those funds. Federal regulations also require a jurisdiction to hold at least two (2) public hearings throughout the program year and in order to obtain the views of citizens on housing and community development needs, including priority nonhousing community development needs, one (1) of these hearings must be held before the proposed Consolidated Plan is published for comment. The City conducted extensive outreach and multiple public meetings during the development of the Consolidated Plan. One (1) public meeting was conducted to gather input prior to the development of the Plan. One (1) additional public hearing was held to obtain feedback on the Preliminary Needs Assessment, including housing and community .needs. The full draft Consolidated Plan is currently available for a 30 -day public comment period and public hearing will be held on May 6, 2015. Outreach is conducted via the internet, newspaper legal advertisements, and public meetings. The prime method for public comments was the public hearings, but organizations and the public were able to submit oral or written comments to the City outside of the public meetings. Outreach for public meetings was conducted via letters to interested parties, posting on the City website, newspaper legal advertisements, and posting in public locations. A special effort is made to reach out to minorities with individualized outreach to minority advocacy groups, and advertising the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a local newspaper of general circulation serving the community. In anticipation of preparation of the Consolidated Plan, staff solicited input from various organizations, public service providers, and City departments in order to determine their current needs and projected needs over the next five years. These groups completed surveys to demonstrate their yearly funding needs and provided a discussion of their program goals, and how their identified funding needs helped meet those goals. They also provided information on anticipated changes including, increases in their Annual Action Plan FY2017/2018 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 P843 service population, changing demographics, as well as changes in funding sources. The information provided by each group was then incorporated into the Priority Needs Assessment. The February 23, 2015, public meeting was helpful with initial issue identification and provided important context for the data analysis in the Needs Assessment and Market Analysis. The second set of public meetings in April 1, and May 6, 2015 helped to support the initial findings and priorities, and helped focus the priorities even further. TABLE 4 - CITIZEN PARTICIPATION OUTREACH Sort Mode of Target of Summary of Summary of Summary of com URL (If Order Outreach Outreach response/attendance comments rec ments not applica eived accepted ble) and reasons Expected Resources AP -15 Expected Resources — 91.220(c) (1, 2) Introduction Entitlement grant resources totaling $849,028 are planned during the next fiscal year (July 1, 2016 — June 30, 2017) to address obstacles, to meet underserved needs, foster decent housing, develop institutional structures, and to enhance coordination between public and private housing, and social Annual Action Plan FY2017/2018 City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Public meeting to solicit input from interested Public Service providers Public and City staff to obtain Public Service information regarding 1 Meeting Providers their anticipated needs None NA and City during the next 5 -year Staff period. Identified needs were addressed in the City's Priority Needs Assessment. Public Notice regarding the draft 2017-2018 Non- targeted/ Annual Action Plan public 2 Newspap broad hearing and the None NA er Ad availability for a 14 day communit review period beginning y July 3, 2017 and ending July 18, 2017. Public hearing for the Non- targeted/ adoption of the 2017- 3 Public broad 2018 Annual Action Plan. None NA Hearing The public hearing will be communit held on Wednesday July y 19, 2017. Expected Resources AP -15 Expected Resources — 91.220(c) (1, 2) Introduction Entitlement grant resources totaling $849,028 are planned during the next fiscal year (July 1, 2016 — June 30, 2017) to address obstacles, to meet underserved needs, foster decent housing, develop institutional structures, and to enhance coordination between public and private housing, and social Annual Action Plan FY2017/2018 City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 C P844 service agencies. The results of these activities will be reported in the Consolidated Annual Performance Evaluation Report (CAPER) to be published in September 2017. TABLE 5 - EXPECTED RESOURCES - PRIORITY TABLE rogram I Source Uses of ! Expected Amount Available Year 1 Expected Narrative of Funds Amount Description Funds ' � Annual Program Prior Year Total: Available i Allocation: Income: Resources: $ Reminder $ $ $ � oP ann Explain how federal funds will leverage those additional resources (private, state and local funds), including a description*of how matching requirements will be satisfied The City and HUD share an interest in leveraging HUD resources to the maximum extent feasible in order to deliver high-quality, creative, and efficient housing, neighborhood improvement programs, supportive services, and economic development. HUD regulations require cities to describe other federal, state, city or private sources, which are expected to be available during the program year. The City will continue to pursue opportunities to obtain additional funding which can help leverage internal resources with federal, state, and local funding sources. If appropriate, describe publically owned land or property located within the jurisdiction that may be used to address the needs identified in the plan No publically owned land within the City will be used to address the needs of the Consolidated Plan. Annual Action Plan FY2017/2018 City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 public - Acquisition The federal Admin and estimated Planning amount of Economic CDBG Development funds Housing available Public over the Improvements planning Public period is Services based on a 5% annual reduction, excluding funds carried over from prior 849,028 176,377 471,687 1,613,153 1 1,613,153 years. Explain how federal funds will leverage those additional resources (private, state and local funds), including a description*of how matching requirements will be satisfied The City and HUD share an interest in leveraging HUD resources to the maximum extent feasible in order to deliver high-quality, creative, and efficient housing, neighborhood improvement programs, supportive services, and economic development. HUD regulations require cities to describe other federal, state, city or private sources, which are expected to be available during the program year. The City will continue to pursue opportunities to obtain additional funding which can help leverage internal resources with federal, state, and local funding sources. If appropriate, describe publically owned land or property located within the jurisdiction that may be used to address the needs identified in the plan No publically owned land within the City will be used to address the needs of the Consolidated Plan. Annual Action Plan FY2017/2018 City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Annual Goals and Objectives AP -20 Annual Goals and Objectives — 91.420, 91.220(c)(3)&(e) TABLE 6 - GOAL SUMMARY Sort Goal Name Start End Category Order I I Year Year V 3 Rehabilitation of Existing Housing Affirmatively Further Fair Housing Choice 2015 2020 Affordable Housing Non - Homeless Special I Needs 2015 12020 1 Fair Housing T Homelessness 2015 and At -Risk of Homelessness Improve Public Facilities and Infrastructure 2015 2020 Homeless Non -Housing Community Development 2020 � Non - Homeless Special Geographic ' Needs Funding Area Addressed Target Area 2 Target Area et Area Annual Action Plan FY2017/2018 City of Rancho Cucamonga Support the CDBG: Rehabilitation $411,000 of Existing Housing P845 Goal Outcome Indicator Homeowner Housing Rehabilitated: 45 Household Housing Unit Promote Fair CDBG: Public service Housing $8,800 activities other than Low/Moderate Income Housing Benefit: 30 Persons Assisted Support Local CDBG: Public service Homeless $5,500 activities for Facilities and Low/Moderate Services Income Housing Benefit: 10 Households Assisted CDBG: Public Facility $90,700 or Infrastructure Activities other than Low/Moderate Income Housing Benefit: 27000 Persons Assisted 13 P846 Sort Goal Name Start End Category Geographic Needs Funding Goal Order, , Year Year Area Addressed Goal Name Outcome Goal Description 2017/2018 -27,000 persons assisted. Goal Name Historic Preservation Goal Description Restoration of the Historic Etiwanda Depot will begin in 2017/2018 program year with current year and previous year funds set aside. Public Services Indicator 5 Historic 2015 2020 Non -Housing Public Facility CDBG: Other: 1 Preservation Community - Historic $50,000 Other Development Preservation 6 Public 2015 2020 Non -Housing Provide CDBG: Public service Services Community Support for $127,300 activities Development Public other than Services Low/Moderate Income Housing Benefit: 4150 Persons Assisted 7 Administration 2015 2020 CDBG Planning and CDBG: Administration Administration $161,000 TABLE 7 - GOAL DESCRIPTION Goal Name Rehabilitation of Existing Housing Goal Description 2017/2018 goal for home repair is 25 households Goal Name Affirmatively Further Fair Housing Choice Goal Description 2017/2018 program year goal is 30 persons assisted Goal Name Homelessness and At -Risk of Homelessness Goal Description 2017/2018 goal is 10 households assisted. Goal Name Improve Public Facilities and Infrastructure Goal Description 2017/2018 -27,000 persons assisted. Goal Name Historic Preservation Goal Description Restoration of the Historic Etiwanda Depot will begin in 2017/2018 program year with current year and previous year funds set aside. Public Services Goal Name Goal Description 2017/2018 program year goals is 4,150 persons assisted Goal Name Administration 2017/2018 program year goal is to assist all those in need Goal Description Annual Action Plan FY2017/2018 City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 P847 AP -35 Projects — 91.220(d) Introduction This plan outlines the actions steps that the City of Rancho Cucamonga will use to address the housing and community development needs of the City. The plan includes a listing of activities that the City will undertake during the 2016-2017 program year (July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017) that utilize CDBG funds. For the 2017/2018 program year, the City will utilized an allocation of $849,028, along with $471,687 in reprogrammed funds from prior years, for a total of $1,320,715. TABLE 8 - PROJECT INFORMATION # Project Name 1 CDBG ADMINISTRATION 2 RANCHO CUCAMONGA PWSD - WHEELCHAIR RAMPS 3 RANCHO CUCAMONGA PWSD - SIDEWALK GRINDING 4 RANCHO CUCAMONGA HOME IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 5 RANCHO CUCAMONGA PWSD - GRAFFITI REMOVAL 6 IFHMB - LANDLORD/TENANT COUNSELING 7 HOUSE OF RUTH 8 INLAND VALLEY HOPE PARTNERS - SOVA 9 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CSD - SENIOR SERVICES 10 FAMILY SERVICES ASSOCIATION - SENIOR NUTRITION 11 RANCHO CUCAMONGA PUBLIC LIBRARY - BACK TO BASICS 12 IFHMB - FAIR HOUSING 13 CAMP FIRE INLAND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 14 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CSD - NORTHTOWN COLLABORATIVE 15 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CSD - SENIOR TRANSPORTATION 16 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CMO - NORTHTOWN/CASA 17 FOOTHILL FAMILY SHELTER -HOUSING 18 ETIWANDA PACIFIC ELECTRIC DEPOT 19 BRINGING HEALTHY HOME 20 FOOTHILL FAMILY SERVICES -FOOD PANTRY Annual Action Plan FY2017/2018 City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 AP -38 Project Summary TABLE 9 - PROJECT SUMMARY Project Name Target Area Projects CDBG ADMINISTRATION P848 Goals Supported Administration Needs Addressed Planning and Administration Funding CDBG: $161,000 Description Includes administration of the CDBG program, the completion of program applications and performance reports, research and analysis, target area studies, historic preservation evaluations, and housing documents. Target Date 06/30/2018 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities j Target Date 1 06/30/2018 Estimate the number Estimated persons assisted is approximately 10,325 in Target Areas and type of families 1, 2, and 3. that will benefit from the proposed activities ', Location Description I Target Areas Annual Action Plan FY2017/2018 City of Rancho Cucamonga 16 Location Description City of Rancho Cucamonga - 10500 Civic Center Dr, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Planned Activities Program Administration 2 Project Name RANCHO CUCAMONGA PWSD - WHEELCHAIR RAMPS Target Area Target Area 2 Target Area 1 Target Area 3 Goals Supported Improve Public Facilities and Infrastructure Needs Addressed Improve and Expand Facilities and Infrastructure Funding CDBG: $22,850 Description This program involves the retrofitting of existing curbs to accommodate disabled individuals. Target Date 1 06/30/2018 Estimate the number Estimated persons assisted is approximately 10,325 in Target Areas and type of families 1, 2, and 3. that will benefit from the proposed activities ', Location Description I Target Areas Annual Action Plan FY2017/2018 City of Rancho Cucamonga 16 P849 Annual Action Plan FY2017/2018 City of Rancho Cucamonga 17 Planned Activities This program involves the retrofitting of 2,880 linear feet of existing curbs to accommodate disabled persons. 3 Project Name RANCHO CUCAMONGA PWSD - SIDEWALK GRINDING Target Area Goals Supported Improve Public Facilities and Infrastructure Needs Addressed Improve and Expand Facilities and Infrastructure Funding CDBG: $22,850 Description Involves the grinding, repair, or replacement of sidewalks that are displaced and/or inaccessible in qualified target areas. Target Date 06/30/2018 Estimate the number Estimated persons assisted is 10,235 in Target Areas 1, 2, and 3. and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities Location Description City-wide Planned Activities Involves the grinding, repair, or replacement of 3,960 square feet of sidewalks that are displaced and/or inaccessible in qualified target areas. RANCHO CUCAMONGA HOME IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 4 Project Name Target Area Goals Supported Rehabilitation of Existing Housing Needs Addressed Support the Rehabilitation of Existing Housing Funding CDBG: $410,500 Description The City has an existing moderate rehabilitation Home Improvement Program available to eligible owner -occupied households, those earning less than 80 percent of the MFI. The program offers deferred payment loans of up to $30,000 and grants of up to $7,500, including emergency repair grants. Target Date 06/30/2018 Estimate the number 2017/2018 estimated households assisted is 25. and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities Location Description City-wide Annual Action Plan FY2017/2018 City of Rancho Cucamonga 17 P850 Annual Action Plan FY2017/2018 City of Rancho Cucamonga 18 Planned Activities The moderate rehabilitation income eligible owner -occupied households, those earning less than 80 percent of the HAMFI. The program offers deferred payment loans of up to $30,000 and grants of Project Name up to $7,500, including emergency repair grants. RANCHO CUCAMONGA PWSD - GRAFFITI REMOVAL 5 Target Area I Target Area 2 Target Area 1 Target Area 3 Goals Supported Improve Public Facilities and Infrastructure Needs Addressed Improve and Expand Facilities and Infrastructure Funding CDBG: $15,000 Description The removal of incidents of graffiti from public properties in qualified target areas. Target Date 6/30/2018 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities Location Description Target areas Planned Activities The removal of 15,000 square feet of graffiti from public properties in 6 qualified target areas. Project Name IFHMB - LANDLORD/TENANT COUNSELING Target Area Goals Supported Public Services .Needs Addressed Provide Support for Public Services Funding CDBG: $7,400 Description Landlord/Tenant dispute mediation services are provided by Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board. Target Date 6/30/2018 Estimate the number 2017/2018 estimated persons assisted is 550 and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities Location Description City -Wide Planned Activities Landlord/Tenant dispute mediation services. Project Name HOUSE OF RUTH Annual Action Plan FY2017/2018 City of Rancho Cucamonga 18 P851 7 Target Area Goals Supported Public Services Needs Addressed Provide Support for Public Services Funding CDBG: $5,500 Description House of Ruth provides shelter, programs, education, and opportunities for safe, self-sufficient, healthy living for battered women and their children who are at -risk of homelessness. Services provided include 24-hour emergency safe shelter (up to 30 days), 24-hour crisis intervention hotline, 24-hour emergency transportation, outreach offices, and children programs. Target Date 06/30/2018 Estimate the number 2017/2018 estimated persons assisted is 200 and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities Location Description City-wide Planned Activities Shelter, programs, education, and opportunities for safe, self- sufficient, healthy living for battered women and their children who are at -risk of homelessness. Services provided include 24-hour emergency safe shelter (up to 30 days), 24-hour crisis intervention hotline, 24-hour emergency transportation, outreach offices, and children programs. Project Name INLAND VALLEY HOPE PARTNERS - SOVA 8 Target Area Goals Supported Public Services Needs Addressed Provide Support for Public Services Support Local Homeless Facilities and Services Funding CDBG: $12,500 Description SOYA offers a 5 -day food supply (15 meals) for all members of a household. SOVA helps families maintain their health and avoid homelessness by providing emergency food assistance and support services. Inland Valley Hope Partners will also be servicing our residents with rapid rehousing program. Target Date 06/30/2018 Estimate the number 2017/2018 estimated persons assisted is 493 and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities Annual Action Plan FY2017/2018 City of Rancho Cucamonga 19 P852 nnual Action Plan FY2017/2018 City of Rancho Cucamonga 20 Location Description Planned Activities A 5 -day food supply (15 meals) for all members of a household. 9 Project Name RANCHO CUCAMONGA CSD - SENIOR SERVICES Target Area Goals Supported Public Services Needs Addressed Provide Support for Public Services Funding CDBG: $12,500 Description Develop and enhance senior citizen classes and activities in the focus areas of physical fitness, recreational and educational development, mental health, and emotional well-being. This service is provided through the City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Services Department. Target Date 06/30/2018 Estimate the number 2017/2018 estimated persons assisted is 3960 and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities Location Description Community Senior Center Planned Activities Develop and enhance senior citizen classes and activities in the focus areas of physical fitness, recreational and educational development, mental health, and emotional well-being. 10 project Name FAMILY SERVICES ASSOCIATION - SENIOR NUTRITION Target Area Goals Supported Public Services Needs Addressed Provide Support for Public Services Funding CDBG: $10,000 Description The nutrition program is run from the Senior Center and provides meals prepared at the RC Senior Center and also provides meals prepared for home delivery. Family Service Association is located at 21250 Box Spring Road, Suite 212, Moreno Valley, CA 92557. Target Date 06/30/2018 Estimate the number 2017/2018 estimated person assisted is 720 and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities Location Description Senior Community Center and City-wide homebound seniors nnual Action Plan FY2017/2018 City of Rancho Cucamonga 20 P853 Annual Action Plan FY2017/2018 City of Rancho Cucamonga 21 Planned Activities The nutrition program is run from the Senior Center and provides meals prepared at the RC Senior Center and also provides meals prepared for home delivery. 11 project Name RANCHO CUCAMONGA PUBLIC LIBRARY - BACK TO BASICS Target Area Goals Supported Public Services Provide Support for Public Services Needs Addressed CDBG: $8,000 Funding Description The Back to Basic program trains volunteer tutors to work with 7 to 12 - year old children identified by school personnel as at -risk (challenged economically and educationally) and who are reading and writing below their grade levels. Target Date 06/30/2018 Estimate the number 2017/2018 estimated youth assisted is 142 and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities Location Description Public Library Program Planned Activities The Back to Basic program trains volunteer tutors to work with 7 to 12 - year old children identified by school personnel as at -risk (challenged economically and educationally) and who are reading and writing below their grade levels. IFHMB - FAIR HOUSING 12 Project Name Target Area Goals Supported Affirmatively Further Fair Housing Choice Needs Addressed Promote Fair Housing Funding CDBG: $8,800 Description Fair Housing services include education, counseling, mediation, and legal referral. Target Date 06/30/2018 Estimate the number 2017/2018 estimated person assisted is 50 and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities Location Description City-wide Planned Activities Fair Housing services including: education, counseling, mediation, and legal referral. Annual Action Plan FY2017/2018 City of Rancho Cucamonga 21 P854 13 project Name CAMP FIRE INLAND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Target Area Goals Supported Public Services Needs Addressed Provide Support for Public Services Funding CDBG: $5,000 Description The program provides immediate relief from hunger, promotes healthy eating and exposes children to nutritious foods. This program provides support to underserved children, ages 5 through 17. Target Date 06/30/2018 Estimate the number 2017/2018 estimated youths served is 700 and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities Location Description City-wide Planned Activities After school snack program for children ages 5 through 17. 14 Project Name RANCHO CUCAMONGA CSD - NORTHTOWN COLLABORATIVE Target Area Target Area 1 Goals Supported Public Services Needs Addressed Provide Support for Public Services Funding CDBG: $9,300 Description The Northtown Collaborative is a community (youth and adult) prevention recreation/human services program provides essential human service programs as well as traditional recreational classes and activities. Target Date 06/30/2018 Estimate the number 2017/2018 estimated persons served is 3,500 and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities Location Description Target Area 1 Planned Activities A community (youth and adult) prevention recreation/human services program provides essential human service programs as well as traditional recreational classes and activities. 15 project Name RANCHO CUCAMONGA CSD - SENIOR TRANSPORTATION Target Area Goals Supported Public Services Annual Action Plan FY2017/2018 City of Rancho Cucamonga 22 P855 Annual Action Plan FY2017/2018 City of Rancho Cucamonga 23 Needs Addressed Provide Support for Public Services Funding CDBG: $16,400 Description The Silver Fox Express program offers door-to-door para -transit service for senior citizens living in Rancho Cucamonga. Target Date 06/30/2018 Estimate the number 2017/2018 estimated seniors served is 140 and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities Location Description City-wide Planned Activities A door-to-door para -transit service for senior citizens living in Rancho project Name Cucamonga. 16 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CMO - NORTHTOWN/CASA Target Area Target Area 1 Goals Supported Public Services Needs Addressed Provide Support for Public Services Funding CDBG: $9,000 Description The NORTHTOWN/CASA program provides a bi-lingual healthy eating/cooking program to educate and support Latino families in the Northtown neighborhood of the City. Target Date 06/30/2018 Estimate the number 2017/2018 estimated persons served is 150 and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities Location Description Target area 1 Planned Activities The Cocinando Amigos Saludables y Alegres (CASA) program provides a bi-lingual healthy eating/cooking program to educate and support Latino families in the Northtown neighborhood of the City, to prepare traditional food that is healthier and more nutritious, as a strategy to prevent diabetes and obesity. 17 project Name FOOTHILL FAMILY SHELTER -HOUSING Target Area Goals Supported Homelessness and At -Risk of Homelessness Public Services Needs Addressed Provide Support for Public Services Support Local Homeless Facilities and Services Annual Action Plan FY2017/2018 City of Rancho Cucamonga 23 P856 Annual Action Plan FY2017/2018 City of Rancho Cucamonga 24 Funding CDBG: $5,000 Description Foothill Family Shelter operates a 90 -day transitional shelter for homeless families with children. Support services are provided to enable families to obtain independence and permanent housing. Target Date 06/30/2018 Estimate the number 2017/2018 estimated persons served is 25 and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities Location Description City-wide Planned Activities A 90 -day transitional shelter for homeless families with children. Support services are provided to enable families to obtain independence and permanent housing. 18 Project Name ETIWANDA PACIFIC ELECTRIC DEPOT Target Area Goals Supported Historic Preservation Needs Addressed Public Facility - Historic Preservation Funding CDBG: $50,000 Description The preservation and historic restoration of the Etiwanda Pacific Electric Depot. The mission of this activity is to preserve the station through renovation for adaptive reuse as a museum and trailhead for the Pacific Electric Inland Trail, a 21 -mile long regional trail. Target Date 06/30/2018 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities Location Description Etiwanda Planned Activities Available funding will be banked to assist with the future preservation and historic restoration of this National Register structure. 19 project Name BRINGING HEALTHY HOME Target Area Target Area 1 Goals Supported Public Services Needs Addressed Provide Support for Public Services Funding CDBG: $4,500 Annual Action Plan FY2017/2018 City of Rancho Cucamonga 24 20 Description Target Date Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities Location Description Planned Activities The project will provides access to fresh, affordable, produce to residents of Southwest Cucamonga awareness and use of local farmers' markets. 6/30/2018 2017/2018 estimated persons served is 100 P857 locally grown and expands Target Area 1 Many local residents identify cost as one of the leading factors that influence their purchase of healthy food. To address this, Bringing Healthy Home (BHH) incorporates a financial -incentive -mechanism to stimulate healthy food purchases by providing Southwest Cucamonga residents with dollar -match subsides (up to $30 per month) on healthy food purchases at the Rancho Cucamonga farmers' markets. This incentive significantly reduces personal cost to participants and exposes them to lower, affordable costs of healthy foods sold at local farmers' markets. To further subsidize dollars, participants can use EBT/WIC/SNAP at both of the Rancho Cucamonga farmers markets. Project Name FOOTHILL FAMILY SERVICES -FOOD PANTRY Public Services Provide Support for _ Public Services Target Area Goals Supported Needs Addressed Support Local Homeless Facilities and Services Funding CDBG: $5,500 Description Community-based food pantry that offers non-perishable food to non - shelter residents within service area. Clients are either homeless or low-income and unable to make ends meet. Eligible clients can come in once every 30 days to receive non-perishable food, diapers, wipes, clothing and hygiene products. Target Date 06/30/2018 Estimate the number 2017/2018 estimated persons served is 650 and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities Location Description City-wide Planned Activities Food distribution Annual Action Plan FY2017/2018 City of Rancho Cucamonga 25 P858 AP -50 Geographic Distribution — 91.220(f) Description of the geographic areas of the entitlement (including areas of low-income and minority concentration) where assistance will be directed During the next year, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will allocate CDBG funds for use in the City's 3 Target Areas, as identified below. These funding percentages were determined by the City based on the Priority Needs Assessment and the availability of CDBG funding. TABLE 10 - GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION Target Area Percentage of Funds Target Area 2 1 Target Area 1 15 Target Area 3 1 Rationale for the priorities for allocating investments geographically The City developed the geographic priorities outlined above with the goal of providing housing and community development improvements for as many low- and moderate -income residents as possible utilizing the City's CDBG allocation. CDBG funds will be focused on public facility or infrastructure projects that can serve a significant number of residents and a greater population density to allow for cost- effective delivery of services. Affordable Housing AP -55 Affordable Housing — 91.220(g) Introduction The City plans to utilize CDBG funds to support a number of authorized housing activities, including the City's Home Improvement Program. These activities are expected to provide rehabilitation assistance to 44 low- and moderate -income households. TABLE 11- ONE YEAR GOALS FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING BY SUPPORT REQUIREMENT One Year Goals for the Number of Households to be Supported Homeless 0 Non -Homeless 25 Special -Needs 0 Total 25 TABLE 12 - ONE YEAR GOALS FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING BY SUPPORT TYPE One Year Goals for the Number of Households Supported Through Rental Assistance 0 The Production of New Units 0 Rehab of Existing Units 25 Acquisition of Existing Units 0 Annual Action Plan FY2017/2018 City of Rancho Cucamonga 26 P859 One Year Goals for the Number of Households Supported -Through Total 25 AP -60 Public Housing -91.220(h) Introduction The Housing Authority of the County of San Bernardino (HACSB) provides eligible residents of San Bernardino County with quality affordable housing in decent and neighborhoods. By working in partnership with the public and private sectors, the HACSB provides families with housing choice and the opportunity to achieve self-sufficiency. HACSB administers the Project Based Senior Housing program, Public/Affordable Housing Program, Tenant Based Rental Assistance Voucher Program, and Project Based Voucher Program. Actions planned during the next year to address the needs to public housing The City will continue to support the Housing Authority of the County of San Bernardino (HACSB) Tenant Based Rental Assistance (TBRA) voucher program and public housing assistance. The HACSB manages a total of 1,321 Public Housing Assistance Units, occupied by 3,711 individuals, which are owned and managed by the HACSB. Within the City, there are 2 public housing units occupied by 14 individuals. County wide, the HACSB also has units that were either acquired or developed through a variety of partnerships with the State of California, San Bernardino County Department of Community Development and Housing, various cities throughout the county, and Housing Partners I, Inc., a non- profit public housing corporation. The HACSB also manages 9,526 Tenant Based Rental Assistance vouchers (previously Section 8) that are occupied by 24,822 individuals. Within the City there are 295 TBRA units occupied by 572 individuals. The voucher program units are privately owned, with rent subsidies paid directly to owners by the Housing Authority and these services are managed by HACSB. Actions to encourage public housing residents to become more involved in management and participate in homeownership HACSB undertakes a variety of initiatives to increase resident involvement, including a comprehensive, updated website that provides information on all facets of the housing authority operations, policies, and procedures. Establishing programs that represent all residents living in HACSB developments. The Resident Advisory Board was established to represent housing residents and voucher participants. Housing Authority staff work closely with RAB members to discuss potential policy changes, get feedback on messaging and communication to residents, and recruit participants for hearings and special events. The HACSB coordinates programs, activities, and services offered to residents, including: • The Family Self Sufficiency Program assists residents to achieve self-sufficiency. This is accomplished through goal setting, intervention, advocacy and community collaboration. Residents can get assistance with seeking employment, job training, and educational opportunities. • The Homeownership Program helps interested participants find an appropriate mortgage lender and work with the participant through the process of buying a home. Annual Action Plan FY2017/2018 City of Rancho Cucamonga 27 P860 • A variety of programs and services for children are made available to residents at various HACSB sites. These include but are not limited to: scholarships, after- school tutoring, health, safety, gang prevention programs, nature projects, etc. If the PHA is designated as troubled, describe the manner in which financial assistance will be provided or other assistance The Housing Authority of the County of San Bernardino is not designated as troubled and is considered a high performer with an assessment score of 90. AP -65 Homeless and Other Special Needs Activities — 91.220(i) Introduction The City's goal is to develop a comprehensive homeless assistance plan that provides a continuum of care with the purpose of ultimately assisting individuals in obtaining and retaining permanent housing. As the first priority in the plan, the City intends to continue funding those agencies that are able to provide the first line of defense in providing outreach and advocacy in assisting individuals and families who are homeless or at -risk of homelessness. These activities include the support of emergency shelter, shelter vouchers, food distribution, advocacy, and referral services. The City will continue to fund landlord/tenant activities as a means of assisting those who are at -risk of homelessness in keeping their homes. Additional assistance will be encouraged for those agencies that provide longer-term transitional shelter and assist in the transition to permanent housing opportunities. Describe the jurisdictions one-year goals and actions for reducing and ending homelessness including reaching out to homeless persons (especially unsheltered persons) and assessing their individual needs The City supports a variety of organizations that provide immediate assistance, advocacy, and short-term shelter to homeless individuals and families. The City will continue to address priority needs, and will continue to evaluate the provision of transitional shelter assistance. These agencies include: Foothill Family Shelter: Foothill Family Shelter operates a 90 -day transitional shelter for homeless families with children. Support services are provided to enable families to obtain independence and permanent housing. They are located at 1501 West Ninth Street, Suite D, and at 230, 238, and 294 North San Antonio Avenue, Upland, CA 91786. House of Ruth: House of Ruth provides shelter, programs, education, and opportunities for safe, self-sufficient, healthy living for battered women and their children who are at -risk of homelessness. Services provided include 24-hour emergency safe shelter for up to 30 days, 24- hour crisis intervention hotline, 24-hour emergency transportation, outreach offices, and children programs. House of Ruth is located in Claremont, at P.O. Box 457, Claremont, CA 91711. • Inland Valley Hope Partners — Food Security Program (SOVA): SOVA offers a 5 -day food supply (15 meals) for all members of a household. SOVA helps families maintain their health and avoid homelessness by providing emergency food assistance and support services. The IVHP offers the SOVA Program from offices located at 635 South Taylor Avenue, Ontario, CA 91761. Annual Action Plan FY2017/2018 City of Rancho Cucamonga 28 P861 Addressing the emergency shelter and transitional housing needs of homeless persons See discussion above regarding the support services provided by Foothill Family Shelter, House of Ruth, and Inland Valley Hope Partners. Helping homeless persons (especially chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth) make the transition to permanent housing and independent living, including shortening the period of time that individuals and families experience homelessness, facilitating access for homeless individuals and families to affordable housing units, and preventing individuals and families who were recently homeless from becoming homeless again See discussion above regarding the support services provided by Foothill Family Shelter, House of Ruth, and Inland Valley Hope Partners. Helping low-income individuals and families avoid becoming homeless, especially extremely low- income individuals and families and those who are: being discharged from publicly funded institutions and systems of care (such as health care facilities, mental health facilities, foster care and other youth facilities, and corrections programs and institutions); or, receiving assistance from public or private agencies that address housing, health, social services, employment, education, or youth needs. See discussion above regarding the support services provided by Foothill Family Shelter, House of Ruth, and Inland Valley Hope Partners. One year goals for the number of households to be provided housing through the use of HOPWA for: Short-term rent, mortgage, and utility assistance to prevent homelessness of the individual or family Tenant -based rental assistance Units provided in housing facilities (transitional or permanent) that are being developed, leased, or operated Units provided in transitional short-term housing facilities developed, leased, or operated with HOPWA funds Total AP -75 Barriers to affordable housing — 91.2200) Introduction Davis -Bacon Prevailing Wages - A prevailing wage must be paid to laborers when federal funds are used to pay labor costs for any project over $2,000 or on any multi -family project over eight units. The prevailing wage is usually higher than competitive wages, raising the cost of housing production and rehabilitation activities. Davis -Bacon also adds to housing costs by requiring documentation of the prevailing wage compliance. Annual Action Plan FY2017/2018 City of Rancho Cucamonga 29 P862 State Prevailing Wage Requirements - The State Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) expanded the kinds of projects that require the payment of prevailing wages. Prevailing wage adds to the overall cost of development. Processing and Development Fees - The City charges a range of development fees and exactions to recover the costs of providing services to new development. Fees are designed to ensure that developers pay a fair pro -rata fair share of the cost of providing infrastructure and to compensate the City for the cost of processing the application. Application fees are established by a Fee Study, which analyzes a number of factors including processing time, number of people needed to review an application relative to the application received. This Fee Study is then used to determine the actual fees which are reviewed and adopted by City Council. Environmental Review - State law (California Environmental Quality Act, California Endangered Species Act) and federal law (National Environmental Protection Act, Federal Endangered Species Act, Migratory Bird Treaty Act) regulations require environmental review of proposed discretionary projects (e.g., subdivision maps, use permits, etc.). Costs resulting from the environmental review process are also added to the cost of housing. Residential Development Review — Project development review is required for the construction of all single-family units, condominium, and apartment projects. Development/Design Review applications are typically filed concurrently with tract or parcel map applications. Applications are reviewed for consistency with applicable development standards of the base district and the City's adopted design guidelines. Water and Sewer - Water and sewer services are provided by Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD). Based upon CVWD's Water Master Plan current water supplies and delivery systems are adequate and present no constraints to housing development. Rancho Cucamonga accounts for approximately 75 percent of CVWD's 47 square mile water service area, but about 90 percent of the customer service base. Sewer is provided by CVWD, while the Inland Empire Utilities Agency (IEUA) provides wastewater treatment facilities. School Facilities - Five school districts serve the City. As a result of the rapid growth prior to incorporation several of the local school districts have faced severe overcrowding. The present concern among the school districts continues to be the inability to finance construction of new school facilities in the post - Proposition 13 years. Financing Options for Required Infrastructure - Generally, the cost to extend urban infrastructure and services continues to serve as a constraint on development, including residential development. This is especially true in Rancho Cucamonga, which incorporated post -Proposition 13 where the City's share of the property tax is very low compared to surrounding cities. Other sources of funding for capital improvements and operating and maintenance costs are extremely limited. Actions it planned to remove or ameliorate the negative effects of public policies that serve as barriers to affordable housing such as land use controls, tax policies affecting land, zoning ordinances, building codes, fees and charges, growth limitations, and policies affecting the return on residential investment The City of Rancho Cucamonga will continue to work with government, public, private, and non-profit community agencies to remove or ameliorate the negative effects of public policies that serve as current barriers to affordable housing. Action steps as recommended and accepted by the City are summarized below: Annual Action Plan FY2017/2018 City of Rancho Cucamonga 30 P863 • The City will work to encourage a variety of housing types including single and multi -family homes, apartments, townhomes, duplexes, and live -work units in order to increase variability and affordability. • The City will evaluate the extent to which housing counseling is available to provide credit repair advice to members of the protected classes and to low- and moderate -income residents, in order to ensure that to the maximum extent possible, residents have access to means of improving their ability to obtain and maintain decent, affordable housing. • The City will support education and outreach efforts by community partners regarding needs assessments for affordable housing and subsidized housing. AP -85 Other Actions — 91.220(k) Introduction The Consolidated Plan provides a framework to address the needs of the City over the next five-year period using Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds. The three overarching objectives guiding the proposed activities are: • Providing Decent Affordable Housing • Creating Suitable Living Environments • Creating Economic Opportunities Outcomes show how programs and activities benefit a community or the people served. The three outcomes that will illustrate the benefits of each activity funded by the CDBG program are: • Improve Availability/Accessibility • Improve Affordability • Improve Sustainability All future activities funded through the Consolidated Plan/Annual Action Plan will support at least one objective and one outcome. The City's framework for realizing the objectives and outcomes is identified in the City's Priority Needs Assessment. Actions planned to address obstacles to meeting underserved needs The primary obstacle identified toward meeting under -served needs is a lack of available resources. This obstacle is and will continue to be an issue. The best way to address this matter is to combine efforts and resources and tap new funding sources. The City is striving to form public/private partnerships as well as seeking out new sources of funding, such as HOME funds to better leverage available funding. Actions planned to foster and maintain affordable housing A majority of the objectives and actions identified as part of this Annual Action Plan are specifically aimed at increasing and maintaining the City's existing affordable housing stock. Activities such as new construction, conservation of at -risk units, and preservation of existing units are all striving to increase the affordable housing stock. Annual Action Plan FY2017/2018 City of Rancho Cucamonga 31 P864 Actions planned to reduce lead-based paint hazards In conjunction with the Home Improvement Program, the City will continue to implement Federal requirements concerning lead-based paint reductions. HUD requires that for any program utilizing CDBG funds, all owners, and/or tenants be notified in writing about the dangers of lead-based paint. Units constructed prior to 1978, which are occupied by children under the age of seven, are inspected for defective paint surfaces. If a child residing in the home has an elevated blood lead level, then defective chewable surfaces will be treated and lead abated. Actions planned to reduce the number of poverty -level families The City has relatively little control over the many factors that may affect the determination of an individual's income level. The primary activity that may be utilized by the City is the support of public service agencies that incorporate job training and life development skills into their programs, which includes most of the agencies currently receiving CDBG funding. The activities funded by the City, particularly those related to non -housing community development, act indirectly to increase economic development in the City. The City, through its CDBG contract activities, complies with Section 3 requirements encouraging the employment of local low-income individuals. From a housing perspective, all of the priorities, objectives, and programs aimed at increasing affordable housing also increase the stock of housing available to those in the lowest income categories. Actions planned to develop institutional structure The Consolidated Plan evaluated gaps in the institutional structure and actions that might be taken to strengthen the system. It was determined that one main action that can be taken toward this is increasing expertise of staff and City Council, which in turn will increase the CDBG program efficiency and effectiveness. Increased contact and coordination among City departments will also contribute to the CDBG program's effectiveness. The City will continue to encourage direct contact between itself and the Public Housing Agency and other service providers operating in the region. Most of the coordination efforts in the west end are tied to funding resources and the type of service provided. Actions planned to enhance coordination between public and private housing and social service agencies Each year the City reviews the Annual Comprehensive Grant application submitted by the Authority whereby the City must certify consistency of the activities with the goals and objectives of the Consolidated Plan. Program Specific Requirements AP -90 Program Specific Requirements — 91.220(1)(1,2,4) Introduction The following describes other program -specific requirements. Annual Action Plan FY2017/2018 City of Rancho Cucamonga 32 P865 Community Development Block Grant Program (CDBG) Reference 24 CFR 91.220(1)(1) Projects planned with all CDBG funds expected to be available during the year are identified in the Projects Table. The following identifies program income that is available for use that is included in projects to be carried out. 1. The total amount of program income that will have been received before the start of the next program year and that has not yet been reprogrammed $76,377 2. The amount of proceeds from section 108 loan guarantees that will be used during the year to address the priority needs and specific objectives identified in the grantee's strategic plan. $0 3. The amount of surplus funds from urban renewal settlements $0 4. The amount of any grant funds returned to the line of credit for which the planned use has not been included in a prior statement or plan $0 5. The amount of income from float -funded activities $0 Total Program Income: $76,377 Other CDBG Requirements 1. The amount of urgent need activities $0 2. The estimated percentage of CDBG funds that will be used for activities that benefit persons of low and moderate income. Overall Benefit - A consecutive period of one, two or three years may be used to determine that a minimum overall benefit of 70% of CDBG funds is used to benefit persons of low and moderate income. Specify the years covered that include this Annual Action Plan. 80.00% The City does not anticipate generating significant amounts of program income during the Consolidated Plan period. Only one activity, the City's Home Improvement Program, provides program income. Outstanding loans are not repaid on a specific schedule, but rather, upon sale or refinance of the home loan. Of the City's FY 2017/218 CDBG allocation, the City plans to allocate 20 percent for eligible planning and administrative activities. These activities are not subject to the low- and moderate -income benefit requirements. The remaining 80 percent of the CDBG allocation will be used to benefit low- and moderate -income persons. Annual Action Plan FY2017/2018 City of Rancho Cucamonga 33 ATTACHMENTS SUPPORTING MAP — LOW/MOD INCOME THRESHOLD CENSUS TRACT BLOCK GROUPS n HWba Rdt----- Banyan t9di 9t at. 0 0 CT 20.23 Sol _ CT 20.1E LMA Block Groups CT T1.10 ■ r r r r r r r B01 CT 20 27 f P BG213 CT= Census Tract : BG - Block Group ar se F-"9 CT 21.03 CT 21 861,2 BG 1. Arrow Rt T-2141 BG 1, 2 CT 21.03 Ci 21A5 Bat 80 2 Bdi & s Baa. Lku Rd MI "1 ®r� eo i City of Rancho Cucamonga LMA Block Groups CT T1.10 ■ r r r r r r r Mensus Tract Boundary Sol ■ e °d @Block Group Boundary a • CT= Census Tract : BG - Block Group ar se P866 Annual Action Plan FY2017/2018 City of Rancho Cucamonga 34 P867 APPLICATION FOR FEDERAL ASSISTANCE (HUD FORM SF -424) Annual Action Plan FY2017/2018 City of Rancho Cucamonga 35 P868 OMB Number: 4040-0004 Expiration Date: 1013112019 Application for Federal Assistance SF -424 ' 1. Type of Submission: Preapplication ® Application ❑ Changed/Corrected Application ' 2. Type of Application: ' If Revision, select appropriate letter(s): ❑ New ® Continuation ' Other (Specify): ❑ Revision ' 3. Date Received: 4. Applicant Identifier: b -17 -MC -06-0556 5a. Federal Entity Identifier: 5b. Federal Award Identifier: State Use Only: 6. Date Received by State- 7. State Application Identifier. 8. APPLICANT INFORMATION: 'a. Legal Name: City of Rancho Cucamonga ` b. Employer/Taxpayer Identification Number (EIN/TIN): ' c. Organizational DUNS: 0070529700000 95-3213002 d. Address: ' Streetl: 10500 Civic Center Drive Streetl: ' City: Rancho Cucamonga County/Parish: ' State: Province: 'Country: CA: California USA: UNITED STATES ` Zip / Postal Code: e. Organizational Unit: Department Name: Planning Department Division Name: f. Name and contact information of person to be contacted on matters involving this application: Prefix: ' First Name: Middle Name: Desiree . Last Name: Lawson Suffix: Melissa Title: Planning Technician Organizational Affiliation: City of Rancho Cucamonga Telephone Number: (909)477-2750, ext 4328 Fax Number. (909) 477-2847 ' 'Email: desiree.lawson@cityofrc.us Application for Federal Assistance SF -424 • 9. Type of Applicant 1: Select Applicant Type: C: City or Township Government Type of Applicant 2: Select Applicant Type: Type of Applicant 3: Select Applicant Type: ' Other (specify): • 10. Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development 11. Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number: 14.219 1 CFDA Title: HCDA - Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Entitlement —� • 12. Funding Opportunity Number: ' Titie: 13. Competition Identification Number: Title. 14. Areas Affected by Project (Cities, Counties, States, etc.): 1 Add Attachment Delete Attachment View Attachment • 15. Descriptive Title of Applicants Project: Housing Rehabilitation; Historic Preservation; Handicap, Street, and Public Facility Improvements; and Public Services (Including: Fair Housing, Landlord Tenant Counseling, Graffiti Removal, Homeless Attach supporting documents as specified in agency instructions. Add Attachments P870 Application for Federal Assistance SF -424 16. Congressional Districts Of: ' a. Applicant CA -031 ' b. Program/Project CA -031 Attach an additional list of Program/Project Congressional Districts if needed. Add Attachment Delete Attachment View Attachment 17. Proposed Project: `a. Start Date: 07/01/2017 ' b. End Dale: 06/30/2016 18. Estimated Funding ($): ' a. Federal 849, 028.00 ` b. Applicant ` c. Slate ' d. Local ' e. Other ` f. Program Income 849,028.00 'g.TOTAL ` 19. Is Application Subject to Review By State Under Executive Order 12372 Process? ❑ a. This application was made available to the State under the Executive Order 12372 Process for review on b. Program is subject to E.O. 12372 but has not been selected by the State for review. ® c. Program is not covered by E.O. 12372. • 20. Is the Applicant Delinquent On Any Federal Debt? (If "Yes," provide explanation in attachment.) ❑ Yes ® No If "Yes", provide explanation and attach 21. `By signing this application, I certify (1) to the statements contained in the list of certifications" and (2) that the statements herein are true, complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge. I also provide the required assurances" and agree to comply with any resulting terms if I accept an award. I am aware that any false, fictitious, or fraudulent statements or claims may subject me to criminal, civil, or administrative penalties. (U.S. Code, Title 218, Section 1001) ® "IAGREE " The list of certifications and assurances, or an internet site where you may obtain this list, is contained in the announcement or agency specific instructions. Authorized Representative.- epresentative:Prefix: Prefix:Mr. ` First Name: Dennis Middle Name: . Last Name: Micahel Suffix: ' Title: Mayor `Telephone Number: 909-477-2700 Fax Number. 909-477-2847 `Email: Council@cityofrc. us 'Signature of Authorized Representative: ' Date Signed: 07/19/2017 P871 CERTIFICATIONS STATE CERTIFICATIONS In accordance with the applicable statutes and the regulations governing the consolidated plan regulations, the State certifies that: Affirmatively Further Fair Housing -- The State will affirmatively further fair housing. Uniform Relocation Act and Anti -displacement and Relocation Plan -- It will comply with the acquisition and relocation requirements of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, as amended, (42 U.S.C. 4601-4655) and implementing regulations at 49 CFR Part 24. It has in effect and is following a residential anti -displacement and relocation assistance plan required under 24 CFR Part 42 in connection with any activity assisted with funding under the Community Development Block Grant or HOME programs. Anti -Lobbying --To the best of the State's knowledge and belief: 1. No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of it, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement; 2. If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, it will complete and submit Standard Form - LLL, "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying," in accordance with its instructions; and 3. It will require that the language of paragraphs 1 and 2 of this certification be included in the award documents for all subawards at all tiers (including subcontracts, subgrants, and contracts under grants, loans, and cooperative agreements) and that all subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly. Authority of State -- The submission of the consolidated plan is authorized under State law and the State possesses the legal authority to carry out the programs under the consolidated plan for which it is seeking funding, in accordance with applicable HUD regulations. Consistency with plan -- The housing activities to be undertaken with Community Development Block Grant, HOME, Emergency Solutions Grant, and Housing Opportunities for Persons With AIDS funds are consistent with the strategic plan in the State's consolidated plan. Section 3 -- It will comply with section 3 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968 (12 U.S.C. 1701 u) and implementing regulations at 24 CFR Part 135. Signature of Authorized Official Date Title Annual Action Plan FY2017/2018 City of Rancho Cucamonga 36 P872 Specific Community Development Block Grant Certifications The State certifies that: Citizen Participation -- It is following a detailed citizen participation plan that satisfies the requirements of 24 CFR §91.115 and each unit of general local government that receives assistance from the State is following a detailed citizen participation plan that satisfies the requirements of 24 CFR §570.486. Consultation with Local Governments -- It has consulted with affected units of local government in the nonentitlement area of the State in determining the method of distribution of funding; 2. It engages in or will engage in planning for community development activities; 3. It provides or will provide technical assistance to units of local government in connection with community development programs; and 4. It will not refuse to distribute funds to any unit of general local government on the basis of the particular eligible activity selected by the unit of general local government to meet its community development needs, except that a State is not prevented from establishing priorities in distributing funding on the basis of the activities selected. Local Needs Identification — It will require each unit of general local government to be funded to identify its community development and housing needs, including the needs of low-income and moderate -income families, and the activities to be undertaken to meet these needs. Community Development Plan -- Its consolidated plan identifies community development and housing needs and specifies both short-term and long-term community development objectives that that have been developed in accordance with the primary objective of the CDBG program (i.e., the development of viable urban communities, by providing decent housing and expanding economic opportunities, primarily for persons of low and moderate income) and requirements of 24 CFR Parts 91 and 570. Use of Funds -- It has complied with the following criteria: Maximum Feasible Priority. With respect to activities expected to be assisted with CDBG funds, it has developed its Action Plan so as to give maximum feasible priority to activities which benefit low and moderate income families or aid in the prevention or elimination of slums or blight. The Action Plan may also include activities which the grantee certifies are designed to meet other community development needs having particular urgency because existing conditions pose a serious and immediate threat to the health or welfare of the community and other financial resources are not available. 2. Overall Benefit. In the aggregate, not less than 70 percent of the CDBG funds, including Section 108 guaranteed loans, received by the State during the following fiscal year(s) [a period designated by the State of one, two, or three specific consecutive fiscal year(s)] will be used for activities that benefit persons of low and moderate income. 3. Special Assessments. It will not attempt to recover any capital costs of public improvements assisted with CDBG Funds, including Section 108 loan guaranteed funds, by assessing any amount against Annual Action Plan FY2017/2018 City of Rancho Cucamonga 37 P873 properties owned and occupied by persons of low and moderate income, including any fee charged or assessment made as a condition of obtaining access to such public improvements. However, if CDBG funds are used to pay the proportion of a fee or assessment that relates to the capital costs of public improvements (assisted in part with CDBG funds) financed from other revenue sources, an assessment or charge may be made against the property with respect to the public improvements financed by a source other than CDBG funds. In addition, in the case of properties owned and occupied by moderate -income (not low-income) families, an assessment or charge may be made against the property for public improvements financed by a source other than CDBG funds if the jurisdiction certifies that it lacks CDBG funds to cover the assessment. Excessive Force -- It will require units of general local government that receive CDBG funds to certify that they have adopted and are enforcing: 1. A policy prohibiting the use of excessive force by law enforcement agencies within its jurisdiction against any individuals engaged in non-violent civil rights demonstrations; and 2. A policy of enforcing applicable State and local laws against physically barring entrance to or exit from a facility or location which is the subject of such non-violent civil rights demonstrations within its jurisdiction. Compliance with Anti -discrimination laws -- The grant will be conducted and administered in conformity with title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d) and the Fair Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 3601-3619) and implementing regulations. Compliance with Laws -- It will comply with applicable laws. Signature of Authorized Official Date Title Annual Action Plan FY2017/2018 City of Rancho Cucamonga 38 P874 APPENDIX TO CERTIFICATIONS INSTRUCTIONS CONCERNING LOBBYING CERTIFICATION: Lobbying Certification This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by section 1352, title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure. Annual Action Plan FY2017/2018 City of Rancho Cucamonga 39 2015-2019 CONSOLIDATED PLAN Priority Needs Assessment Priority Unmet Estimated Estimated 5 - Priority Need Need Annual Annual Cost Year Cost Need AFFORDABLE HOUSING Rental assistance L 88 $104,256 $398,400 Production of new units N 0 $0 $0 Rehabilitation of existing units Home Improvement Program H 117 $460,000 $2,300,000 Acquisition of existing units N 0 $0 $0 HOMELESSNESS Outreach H 1 $0 $0 Emergency shelter and transitional housing H 20 $5,000 $25,000 Rapid Re -housing N 0 $0 $0 Prevention H 1 $0 $0 NON -HOUSING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Public Facilities Etiwanda Pacific Electric Depot L 1 $200,000 $1,000,000 Public Improvements and Infrastructure Street Improvements Madrone Avenue H 1 $26,400 $132,000 Pecan Avenue L 1 $187,000 $935,000 Sidewalk Grinding H 1 $22,850 $114,250 Wheelchair Ramps H 1 $22,850 $114,250 Public Services Senior Services Senior Nutrition H 1,685 $11,600 $58,000 Senior Programs H 965 $12,000 $60,000 Senior Transportation H 140 $15,400 $77,000 Youth At -Risk Services Literacy H 140 $8,000 $40,000 Youth Programs H 2,276 $22,450 $112,250 Public Services (General) Domestic Violence Shelter H 200 $6,000 $30,000 Emergency Food Assistance H 960 $18,500 $92,500 Fair Housing Activities H 30 $15,000 $75,000 Graffiti Removal H 1 $16,400 $82,000 Landlord Tenant Counseling H 450 $12,000 $60,000 Violence Prevention & Education H 1 960 1 $6,900 $34,500 Economic Development H 1 1 1 $534,560 $2,672,800 H = High, L = Low, N = No identified need. P875 ATTACHMENT 2 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program 2017/2018 Annual Action Plan July 19, 2017 Annual Action Plan • 1 -year Action Plan -July 1, 2017 thru June 30, 2018 • Addresses objectives of Consolidated Plan • Identifies how CDBG funds will be used, sets accomplishment goals for each activity, and a completion time frame. • Includes: Administration (cap 20%), Capital Improvements, Historic Preservation, and Public Service activities (cap 15%). CDBG Primary Goals All activities must meet one of the two: • The development of viable urban communities, including decent housing and a suitable living environment. • The expansion of economic opportunities, principally for persons of low- and moderate- income. CDBG National Objective • All activities must meet one of three the following: • Benefit low- and moderate- income persons. • Prevent or eliminate slums or blight. • Meet other community development needs having a particular urgency because existing conditions pose a serious threat to the health or welfare of the community and other financial resources are not available to meet such needs. Banyan Low- and Moderate- Income Census Tract Map Is,-4mranm.� cT Bo 11 i� n ess, 3 FoatlM 0 1 ,i GT 21. i BG 1, Amw Rt fT-21.01 . 1,2'CT 21.05 ib.- BG1 erg � 3 yff Sol ild, FIAWN-0,70 a I 1 0 111. FAIC '- i/d ;� • — ry CT 21.Q7 -- r �. 4s CT-22.07City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 9Gol I LMA Block Groups 02 i OT 1211.10 l a ■ ' Census Tract Boundary � 1 ■ s, ■Block Group Roundary 4 CT = Census Tract ■ BG =Block Group ! i — ■ an, sf Low- and Moderate- Income Limits • Individuals/families at or below 80% of the Housing Urban Area Median Family Income (HAMFI) • Gross income for all household members FY 2017 Income Limits Summary Median Persons in Family FY 2017 Income Limit Income FY 2017 Incame Limit Area Category 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Very Law (5011%) Income Limits 22,600 25,800 29,050 32,250 34,850 37,450 40,000 42,600 Extremely Low Income San Bernardino $63,200 Limits ($)* 13,550 16,240 20,420 24,600 28,780 32,960 37,140 41,320 County Low (8O%) Income Limits i'($) F 36,150 41,300 46,450 51,640 55,750 59,900 64,000 68,150 Annual Funding • CDBG funds are provided by HUD. • FY 2017/2018 Allocation is $849,028 • $31,810 (3.89%) increase from FY 16/17 • Allocation formula is based on: • Poverty Rate • Population • Overcrowding 2017/2018 Annual Action Plan Funding Recommendations 0 Administration - 20% Cap — CDBG Administration................................................................................................$161,000 — Fair Housing..................................................................................................................................$8,800 Capital Improvement — Wheelchair Ramps...........................................................................................................$22,850 — Sidewalk Grinding.............................................................................................................$22,850 — Le Grande — Street Improvement (reserve funding) .......... $457000 Home Improvement — Home Improvement Program.........................................................................$411,000 Historic Preservation — Etiwanda Pacific Electric Depot.....................................................................$50,000 Recommendations Continued Public Service Activities — Back to Basics - Library........................................................................................ — Graffiti Removal - City Yard............................................................................. — Northtown/CASA - Healthy RC/CMO............................................... — Northtown Collaborative - Community Services Dept — Senior Services - Community Services Dept .................. — Senior Transportation - Community Services Dept — Bringing Healthy Home - Healthy RC/CMO...................... $15,000 ...,$9,000 ....$9,300 $12)500 $16,400 ____$4, 500 Recommendations Continued Public Service Activities — Camp Fire.................................................................................................... — Foothill Family Shelter (pantry and housing) — Family Services Association — House of Ruth — Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board — Inland Valley Hope Partners ........................................ ,...$5,500 $11,000 $11,250 ....$6)500 ...$7,400 $11)000 Closing • Staff recommends that the City Council adopts the 2017/2018 Annual Action Plan. • 2017/2018 Annual Action Plan is due to HUD by August 16, 2017, an extended deadline due to the delay of allocation. P876 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA #wkSTAFF REPORT DATE: July 19, 2017 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director Noah Daniels, Finance Manager N SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE RESOLUTION CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAMS AND ASSESSMENTS; APPROVE THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS; AND ORDER THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 36, 4-R, 5, 6-R, 7, 8, 9 AND 10, STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, AND 8, AND PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. PD -85 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017/18. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt Resolutions confirming the assessment diagrams and levy of assessments for the Landscape Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3A, 313, 4-R, 5, 6-R, 7, 8, 9 and 10, Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8, and Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD -85 for Fiscal Year 2017/18. BACKGROUND: On June 21, 2017, the City Council adopted resolutions ordering the preparation of the Engineer's Reports for the levy of annual assessments for the Landscape Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3A, 36, 4-R, 5, 6-R, 7, 8, 9 and 10, Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8, and Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD -85 (each a "District" and collectively, the "Districts"). The Engineer's Report is prepared by a registered engineer and contains five parts: 1. Plans and Specifications for the District improvements; 2. A cost estimate of the improvements; 3. An assessment diagram of the area to be assessed; 4. Method of apportionment of assessment; and 5. An assessment roll listing the parcels to be assessed. The purpose of the Engineer's Report is to provide a public document that describes the improvements expected to be installed or maintained by the District, describes the methods used by the Engineer of Work to determine the level of benefit of each parcel in the District, and provides proposed assessment amounts for each parcel. Page 1 of 5 P877 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CONFIRMING DIAGRAMS AND LEVY OF ASSESSMENTS JULY 19, 2017 ANALYSIS: City staff has prepared the Final Engineer's Reports for the Districts and filed them with the City Clerk. The reports contain detailed descriptions of the improvements and associated costs, the properties to be assessed, and the proposed assessments on each parcel within each district. The Resolutions of Intention that were adopted on June 21, 2017, set the required public hearing for July 19, 2017, at 7:00 p.m. in the City of Rancho Cucamonga Council Chambers. Notices for all districts were published in accordance with the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972. After the public hearing, the City Council may adopt Resolutions confirming the levy of assessments as originally proposed for the Districts. Upon final adoption, the Districts will be reconfirmed for Fiscal Year 2017/18 and the assessment amounts will be posted to the County of San Bernardino tax rolls. These assessments will appear as a separate item on the property tax bill for each parcel. The Districts are not required to comply with Proposition 218 balloting requirements unless the assessments are projected to be increased beyond the voter approved assessments, excluding any consumer price index (CPI) increase that was approved by voters. No Proposition 218 vote is required since no assessments for Fiscal Year 2017/18 exceed any previously property owner approved CPI index calculation increases. Landscape Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4-R, 5, 6-R, 7, 8, 9 and 10 generally provide for the maintenance and operation of parks and other landscaping. Maintenance and operation includes, but is not limited to, turf, ground cover, planter beds, shrubs, plants and trees, landscape lighting, irrigation systems, electrical energy for irrigation controllers, insect/disease control, graffiti removal, hardscapes, entry signs, sound walls, and all appurtenant facilities. The City utilizes current year assessment revenues and (in some cases) contributions from the General Fund to meet each district's annual expenses. When the landscape maintenance districts were established, they were created in conjunction with new development coming into the City, and were intentionally designed to ensure that each district bore the costs of the maintenance of the infrastructure that provides special benefit to the property owners. However, in certain districts, it has been over 20 years since there was an assessment increase so the services must be supplemented by General Fund contributions. Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 generally provide for the maintenance and operation of street lights, traffic signals, and appurtenant facilities. This maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of street lighting maintenance, including repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement providing for illumination of the subject area in connection with these Districts. In Fiscal Year 2016/17, the City Council authorized the purchase of Southern California Edison's existing street light system within the City. The funding from the City's Capital Reserve Fund for the purchase of the street lights and installation of Light Emitting Diode (LED) street lighting will be repaid over a 20 -year period from savings in the street lighting maintenance districts. Page 2 of 5 P878 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CONFIRMING DIAGRAMS AND LEVY OF ASSESSMENTS JULY 19, 2017 Similar to the landscape maintenance districts, the street lighting maintenance districts were designed to ensure that each district bore the costs of the maintenance for the infrastructure that provides special benefit to the property owners. However, since assessment rates cannot be increased without a vote by the property owners, some services must be supplemented by General Fund contributions. Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD -85 is a combination Improvement and Maintenance District. The district boundary is citywide with the general exception of land east of Deer Creek Channel and the Victoria, Caryn, and Terra Vista Planned Communities. The District provides the maintenance and operation of Red Hill and Heritage Community Parks including, but not limited to, grading, planting, irrigation, onsite roads, sidewalks, parking lots, lighting, waterscape, restrooms, senior citizens' facilities, playground equipment, picnic facilities, major lighted athletic facilities, jogging trails, sanitary sewer connections, and onsite drainage inlets. The table below summarizes the levy for each District for Fiscal Year 2017/18: Assessment Districts Proposed District Levy Notes $ 1,240,983 No change from prior year. LMD 1 (General City) LMD 2 $ 3,405,572 Increase from prior year for (Victoria Neighborhood Parks) CPI factor. LMD 3A (Hyssop) $ 3,724 No change from prior year. LMD 3B (Commercial Industrial) $ 821,939 No change from prior year. LMD 4-R $ 2,742,301 Decrease from prior year to (Terra Vista Planned Community) match spending. LMD 5 (Andover) $ 2,493 No change from prior year. LMD 6-R $ 495,033 Increase from prior year for (Caryn Planned Community) CPI factor. No change from prior year. LMD 7 (North Etiwanda) $ 943,565 $ 34,261 LMD 8 (South Etiwanda) No change from prior year. LMD 9 Increase from prior year to (Lower Etiwanda) $ 303,178 ease back the use of fund balance. LMD 10 (Rancho Etiwanda) $ 559,404 No change from prior year. SLD 1 (Arterials) $ 813,701 No change from prior year. No change from prior year. SLD 2 (Local Streets) $ 372,014 Page 3 of 5 P879 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CONFIRMING DIAGRAMS AND LEVY OF ASSESSMENTS JULY 19, 2017 Assessment Districts Proposed District Le Notes SLD 3 (Victoria Planned Community) $ 355,484 No change from prior year. $ 164,002 SLD 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community) No change from prior year. $ 44,150 SLD 5 (Caryn Planned Community) No change from prior year. SLD 6 (Commercial Industrial) $ 134,873 No change from prior year. SLD 7 (North Etiwanda) $ 129,482 No change from prior year. SLD 8 (South Etiwanda) $ 70,955 No change from prior year. PD -85 (Red Hill and Heritage Parks) $ 1,158,656 No change from prior year. The assessment levy noted in the Annual Status Report for each district are net of estimated delinquencies for budgetary purposes. In cases of delinquency and foreclosure, the parcels will be subject to penalties. If approved, City staff will file the certified list of all parcels subject to the assessment levy with the County of San Bernardino no later than the County's August 10, 2017 submittal deadline. Adoption of the Resolutions will provide for the Fiscal Year 2017/18 levy upon the parcels within each District that are not otherwise exempt from taxation, at the rates set forth in the attached Annual Status Reports for Fiscal Year 2017/18. FISCAL IMPACT: The Districts are separate from the City General Fund. The assessment revenues that are collected for each district are used for the maintenance and operations for only that District. The total amount the Districts are supplemented by General Fund contributions for Fiscal Year 2017/18 is $1,128,620. COUNCIL GOAL ADDRESSED: There is no City Council Goal addressed. The process of confirming the assessment diagrams and levy of assessments is required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 01 — Resolution No. 17-072 Attachment 02 — Resolution No. 17-073 Attachment 03 — Resolution No. 17-074 Attachment 04 — Final Engineer's Report — LMD 1 Attachment 05 — Final Engineer's Report — LMD 2 Attachment 06 — Final Engineer's Report — LMD 3A Attachment 07 — Final Engineer's Report — LMD 3B Attachment 08 — Final Engineer's Report — LMD 4-R Attachment 09 — Final Engineer's Report — LMD 5 Attachment 10 — Final Engineer's Report — LMD 6-R Page 4 of 5 P880 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CONFIRMING DIAGRAMS AND LEVY OF ASSESSMENTS JULY 19, 2017 Attachment 11 — Final Engineer's Report — LIVID 7 Attachment 12 — Final Engineer's Report — LIVID 8 Attachment 13 — Final Engineer's Report — LIVID 9 Attachment 14 — Final Engineer's Report — LIVID 10 Attachment 15 — Final Engineer's Report — SLD 1 Attachment 16 — Final Engineer's Report — SLD 2 Attachment 17 — Final Engineer's Report — SLD 3 Attachment 18 — Final Engineer's Report — SLD 4 Attachment 19 — Final Engineer's Report — SLD 5 Attachment 20 — Final Engineer's Report — SLD 6 Attachment 21 — Final Engineer's Report — SLD 7 Attachment 22 — Final Engineer's Report — SLD 8 Attachment 23 — Final Engineer's Report — PD -85 Page 5 of 5 P881 RESOLUTION NO. 17-072 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAMS AND ASSESSMENTS; APPROVING THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS; AND ORDERING THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 36, 4-R, 5, 6-R, 7, 8, 9 AND 10 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017/18 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 215' day of June, 2017, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 17-045 (the "Resolution of Intention") pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, as amended (the "1972 Act"), declaring its intention to levy and collect assessments within Landscape Maintenance Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4-R, 5, 6-R, 7, 8, 9 and 10 (each a "District" and collectively the "Districts") for Fiscal Year 2017/18 and giving notice of the time and place for a public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessments within the Districts; and WHEREAS, the City Council previously received and preliminarily approved a report of the Assessment Engineer (each an "Annual Engineer's Report" and collectively the "Annual Engineer's Reports") for each District as required pursuant to Article 4 of Chapter 1 of the 1972 Act, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act (Government Code Section 53750 and following) (the "Implementation Act") (the 1972 Act, Article XIIID and the Implementation Act are referred to collectively as the "Assessment Law"); and WHEREAS, notice of such public hearing was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by the Assessment Law, shown by the affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the Office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received and considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom, and said City Council having now acquired jurisdiction to order the proposed work. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, as follows: SECTION 1. This City Council hereby finds and determines that: A. Notice of the public hearing has been given and the proceedings for the consideration of the levy of the annual assessments within each District have been undertaken in accordance with the 1972 Act; and B. The annual assessments for Fiscal Year 2017/18 proposed to be levied within each District as set forth in the applicable Annual Engineer's Report do not exceed the annual assessments as previously authorized to be levied within such District, and therefore, the proposed levy of assessments for Fiscal Year 2017/18 within such District are not deemed to be "increased" over the maximum authorized annual assessments. SECTION 2. The final assessments and diagrams for the proceedings, as contained in the Annual Engineer's Report for each of the Districts, is hereby approved and confirmed. The assessments for the Districts contained in the Annual Engineer's Reports for Fiscal Year 2017/18 are hereby levied upon the respective lots or parcels in the Districts in the amounts as set forth in the applicable Annual Resolution No. 17-072— Page 1 of 2 ATTACHMENT #01 P882 Engineer's Report. SECTION 3. This City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in the Resolution of Intention, be done and made. SECTION 4. The above -referenced diagram and assessment shall be filed in the Office of the City Clerk. Said diagram and assessment, and the certified copy thereof, shall be open for public inspection. SECTION 5. The City Clerk is hereby ordered and directed to immediately file a certified copy of the diagram and assessment with the County Auditor. Such filing shall be made no later than the 3rd Monday in August 2017. SECTION 6. After the filing of the diagram and assessment, the County Auditor shall enter on the County assessment roll opposite each lot or parcel of land the amount assessed thereupon, as shown in the assessment. SECTION 7. The assessments shall be collected at the same time and in the same manner as County taxes are collected, and all laws providing for the collection and enforcement of County taxes shall apply to the collection and enforcement of the assessments. SECTION 8. The assessments as above confirmed and levied for these proceedings will provide revenue and relate to the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2017 and ending June 30, 2018. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 19th day of July 2017. Resolution No. 17-072— Page 2 of 2 ATTACHMENT #01 P883 RESOLUTION NO. 17-073 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAMS AND THE ASSESSMENTS; APPROVING THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS; AND ORDERING THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017/18 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 21 sc day of June, 2017, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 17-048 (the "Resolution of Intention") pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, as amended (the "1972 Act"), declaring its intention to levy and collect assessments within Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 (each a "District" and collectively the "Districts") for Fiscal Year 2017/18 and giving notice of the time and place for a public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessments within the Districts; and WHEREAS, the City Council previously received and preliminarily approved a report of the Assessment Engineer (each an "Annual Engineer's Report" and collectively the "Annual Engineer's Reports") for each District as required pursuant to Article 4 of Chapter 1 of the 1972 Act, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act (Government Code Section 53750 and following) (the "Implementation Act") (the 1972 Act, Article XIIID and the Implementation Act are referred to collectively as the "Assessment Law"); and WHEREAS, notice of such public hearing was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by the Assessment Law, shown by the affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the Office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received and considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired jurisdiction to order the proposed work. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, as follows: SECTION 1. This City Council hereby finds and determines that: A. Notice of the public hearing has been given and the proceedings for the consideration of the levy of the annual assessments within each District have been undertaken in accordance with the 1972 Act; and B. The annual assessments for Fiscal Year 2017/18 proposed to be levied within each District as set forth in the applicable Annual Engineer's Report do not exceed the annual assessments as previously authorized to be levied within such District, and therefore, the proposed levy of assessments for Fiscal Year 2017/18 within such District are not deemed to be "increased" over the maximum authorized annual assessments. SECTION 2. The final assessments and diagrams for the proceedings, as contained in the Annual Engineer's Report for each of the Districts, is hereby approved and confirmed. The assessments for the Districts contained in the Annual Engineer's Reports for Fiscal Year 2017/18 are hereby levied Resolution No. 17-073 — Page 1 of 2 ATTACHMENT #02 P884 upon the respective lots or parcels in the Districts in the amounts as set forth in the applicable Annual Engineer's Report. SECTION 3. This City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in the Resolution of Intention, be done and made. SECTION 4. The above -referenced diagram and assessment shall be filed in the Office of the City Clerk. Said diagram and assessment, and the certified copy thereof, shall be open for public inspection. SECTION 5. The City Clerk is hereby ordered and directed to immediately file a certified copy of the diagram and assessment with the County Auditor. Such filing shall be made no later than the 3rd Monday in August 2017. SECTION 6. After the filing of the diagram and assessment, the County Auditor shall enter on the County assessment roll opposite each lot or parcel of land the amount assessed thereupon, as shown in the assessment. SECTION 7. The assessments shall be collected at the same time and in the same manner as County taxes are collected, and all laws providing for the collection and enforcement of County taxes shall apply to the collection and enforcement of the assessments. SECTION 8. The assessments as above confirmed and levied for these proceedings will provide revenue and relate to the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2017 and ending June 30, 2018. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 19th day of July 2017. Resolution No. 17-073 — Page 2 of 2 ATTACHMENT #02 P885 RESOLUTION NO. 17-074 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT; APPROVING THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT; AND ORDERING THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. PD - 85 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017/18 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 21s' day of June, 2017, adopt its Resolution of Intention No.17-051 pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, as amended (the "1972 Act"), declaring its intention to levy and collect assessments within Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD -85 (the "District") for Fiscal Year 2017/18 and giving notice of the time and place for a public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessments within the Districts; and WHEREAS, the City Council previously received and preliminarily approved a report of the Assessment Engineer as required by the 1972 Act; and WHEREAS, notice of such public hearing was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by law, shown by the affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the Office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received and considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom, and said City Council having now acquired jurisdiction to order the proposed work. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, as follows: SECTION 1: This City Council hereby finds and determines that notice of the public hearing has been given and the proceedings for the consideration of the levy of the annual assessments within each district have been undertaken in accordance with the 1972 Act. SECTION 2: The final assessments and diagram for the proceedings, as contained in the final Annual Engineer's Report for the District, are hereby approved and confirmed. The assessments for the District contained in the Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2017/18 are hereby confirmed and levied upon the respective lots or parcels in the District in the amounts as set forth in applicable Annual Engineer's Report. SECTION 3: This City Council finds and determines that the public interest and convenience requires the levy and collection of assessments within the District for Fiscal Year 2017/18, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 17- 051, be done and made. SECTION 4: The above -referenced diagram and assessment shall be filed in the Office of the City Clerk. Said diagram and assessment, and the certified copy thereof, shall be open for public inspection. SECTION 5: The City Clerk is hereby ordered and directed to immediately file a certified copy of the diagram and assessment with the County Auditor. Said filing is to be made no later than the 3rd Resolution No. 17-074 — Page 1 of 2 ATTACHMENT #03 P886 Monday in August, 2017. SECTION 6: After the filing of the diagram and assessment, the County Auditor shall enter on the County assessment roll opposite each lot or parcel of land the amount assessed thereupon, as shown in the assessment. SECTION 7: The assessments shall be collected at the same time and in the same manner as County taxes are collected, and all laws providing for the collection and enforcement of County taxes shall apply to the collection and enforcement of the assessments. SECTION 8: The assessments as above confirmed and levied for these proceedings will provide revenue and relate to the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2017 and ending June 30, 2018. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 19th day of July 2017. Resolution No. 17-074 — Page 2 of 2 ATTACHMENT #03 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2017/2018 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (General City) P887 kyacA ew,- -4 d1 P888 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. (GENERAL CITY) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2700 Fax: 909.477.2849 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Lynne B. Kennedy, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Sam Spagnolo, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director P889 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER 1 INTRODUCTION 3 Reason for Assessment 3 Process for Annual Assessment 3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 4 Description of the Boundaries of the District 4 Description of Improvements and Services 4 Map of Improvements 18 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 19 District Budget 20 Definitions of Budget Items 22 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 23 Overview 23 General Benefit 24 Special Benefit 24 Method of Assessment Spread 25 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM 26 ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS 28 Assessment Roll 28 Annexations 28 P890 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on June 21, 2017 the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 17-045, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (General City) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed staff to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2017/18 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. Fiscal Year 2017/18 Budget Expenditures Personnel Services $ 31,220 Operations and Maintenance 1,240,760 Capital Expenditures 40,500 Transfer Out 90,000 Total Expenditures Budget 1,402,480 Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies 1,228,530 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 13,900 Subtotal - Taxes 1,242,430 Other Revenues 63,230 Transfer In 213,410 Total Revenues Budget 1,519,070 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ 116,590 Total District EBU Count 13,457.68 Actual Assessment per EBU $ 92.21 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU $ 92.21 Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #04 P891 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. 2. 1 have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, I certify that the Annual Engineer's Report and Assessment Diagram included herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #04 P892 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include, but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement or facility such as paseos, community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, and providing for the growth, vigor and care of the trees and landscape plant materials. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting of landscape or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the District for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the District by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the District. • Refers to the Engineer's Report, on file with the City Clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the City Clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #04 P893 hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including the improvements, to the zones within the District, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing, must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to, the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area of the City which is not located within the City's planned development communities. The District is made up of various landscaped sites throughout the City. As such, the parcels within the District do not represent a distinct district area as do the other landscape maintenance districts within the City. Typically parcels have been annexed to the District as they have developed. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements maintained by the District include the paseos, community trails, trees, landscaped sites and appurtenant facilities that are throughout the District. These improvements are located within the street right-of-ways and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, the pruning, fertilizing, mowing, weeding, pest control, removal of trash/debris, and irrigation of the trees, shrubs, vines, ground cover, and turf. Maintenance of associated improvements and facilities, such as community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, includes but is not limited to, grading and replacement of trail surfacing, trail fence repair and replacement, steel fence painting, repair and replacement, and irrigation systems control, adjustment, trouble -shooting, repair and replacement. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #04 P894 capital projects and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Parks: Bear Gulch Park, East and West Beryl Park, Old Town Park, Church Street Park, Golden Oaks Park, Hermosa Park, and the undeveloped Don Tiburcio Tapia Park. Site # Descriptive Location A-1 The north and south side of Wilson from Hellman to Amethyst. Ground Cover area: 22,982 square feet Hardscape area: 5,694 square feet A-2 The east side of Hellman from 326 feet south of Pepperidge to 73 feet north of Pepperidge. Ground Cover area: 5,810 square feet Hardscape area: 1,600 square feet A-3 The south side of 19th from 62 feet east of Mayberry to 173 feet east of Mayberry. Ground Cover area: 1,680 square feet Hardscape area: 440 square feet A-4 The south side of Wilson from Amethyst to Archibald; the planters and cutouts on the west side of Archibald from Wilson to 105 feet south of Cottonwood. Ground Cover area: 5,625 square feet A-5 The north and south side of Diamond from Klusman to Diamond. Ground Cover area: 3,143 square feet Hardscape area: 1,864 square feet A-6 The parkway on the north side of Wilson from 348 feet east of Morning Canyon to Alder Ridge. Ground Cover area: 5,700 square feet Hardscape area: 4,760 square feet A-7 The cutouts and vines on the south side of Wilson from the Alta Loma Channel to 240 feet east of Zapata. Ground Cover area: 911 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #04 P895 A-8 The east side of Broken Star from 80 feet south of Highland to Highland; the north side of Highland from Amethyst to Broken Star including wood chip area north of sidewalk, the south side of Highland from Broken Star to Amethyst; the west side of Amethyst from 140 feet south of Highland to 265 feet south of Highland. Ground Cover area: 6,545 square feet Hardscape area: 2,554 square feet Mulchscape area: 14,005 square feet A-9 The south side of Highland from Hellman to Broken Star. Ground Cover area: 7,865 square feet A-10 The south side of 19th from 170 feet west of Pilgrim to 167 feet east of Pilgrim. Ground Cover area: 1,808 square feet Hardscape area: 1,084 square feet A-11 The east side of Amethyst from Lemon to 230 feet north of Apricot. Ground Cover area: 2,115 square feet Hardscape area: 3,438 square feet A-12 The west side of Sapphire from 710 feet north of Hillside to Hillside. Ground Cover area: 4,500 square feet A-13 The south side of Victoria from 110 feet west of London to Ramona. Ground Cover area: 2,705 square feet Hardscape area: 3,480 square feet A-14 The west side of Archibald from 273 feet north of La Gloria to Lemon; the La Gloria median from Archibald to Jadeite; the north and south side of La Gloria from Archibald to 53 feet east of Jadeite; the north side of Lemon from Archibald to 55 feet east of Klusman. Ground Cover area: 12,880 square feet Hardscape area: 12,030 square feet A-15 The planters and cutouts on the east side of Archibald from 610 feet south of Cottonwood to Wilson; the south side of Wilson from Archibald to Alta Loma Channel. Ground Cover area: 2,110 square feet A-16 The cutouts and planters on the east side of Archibald from Banyan to 190 feet north of Sunflower. Ground Cover area: 1,580 square feet A-17 The cutouts and planters on the west side of Archibald from 225 feet south of Wilson to Banyan. Ground Cover area: 2,362 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #04 P896 A-18 The cutouts and planters on the north side of Banyan from Jadeite to 410 feet west of Jadeite. Ground Cover area: 216 square feet A-19 The cutouts and planters on the east side of Amethyst from 192 feet south of Sunflower to Manzanita. Ground Cover area: 4,325 square feet A-20 The west side of Archibald from 210 feet north of La Colina to 230 feet south of Almond; the south side of La Colina from Archibald to Jadeite. Ground Cover area: 17,120 square feet A-21 The planter adjacent to the equestrian trail from Riverwood to Raspberry north of the County flood retention basin that is west of Chaffey College. Ground Cover area: 22,832 square feet A-22 The west side of Haven from Carrari to Vista Grove. Ground Cover area: 4,572 square feet A-23 The west side of Haven from 434 feet north of Manzanita to 258 feet south of Manzanita. Ground Cover area: 54,250 square feet Hardscape area: 4,581 square feet A-24 The south side of 19th from 286 feet east of Amethyst to 166 feet west of Klusman. Ground Cover area: 5,904 square feet Hardscape area: 2,938 square feet A-25 The equestrian trail and planters on the east side of Hermosa from 421 feet south of Whispering Forest to Sun Valley. Ground Cover area: 17,529 square feet A-26 The west side of Haven from 630 feet north of Wilson to Wilson; the parkway on the north side of Wilson from Haven to Mayberry; the parkway on the east side of Mayberry from Wilson to 382 feet north of Poplar, and the east and west side of Cartilla from Wilson to Poplar. Ground Cover area: 10,243 square feet Mulchscape area: 25,297 square feet A-27 The north side of 19th from Mayberry to 93 feet east of Castle Gate. Ground Cover area: 5,145 square feet Hardscape area: 2,870 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #04 P897 A-28 The east side of Hermosa from 360 feet south of Manzanita to Manzanita, and the south side of Manzanita from Hermosa to Raspberry. Ground Cover area: 7,421 square feet Hardscape area: 4,712 square feet A-29 The south side of Wilson from 240 feet west of Timbermist to Hermosa; the west side of Hermosa from Wilson to 213 feet south of Oak Grove. Ground Cover area: 11,184 square feet A-30 Site was removed from contract and water service cancelled January 1, 2017. A-31 The south side of Lemon from London to Calle Hermosa. Ground Cover area: 4,404 square feet Hardscape area: 1,800 square feet A-32 The north side of Lemon from the Alta Loma Channel to London; the east side of London from Lemon to Cypress. Ground Cover area: 4,463 square feet Hardscape area: 3,375 square feet A-33 The parkway on the east side of London from 158 feet north of Banyan to 310 feet north of Banyan. Ground Cover area: 1,029 square feet Hardscape area: 1,160 square feet A-34 The south side of Alta Loma from Mayberry to Revere. Ground Cover area: 2,772 square feet A-34 The south side of Alta Loma from Mayberry to Revere. Ground Cover area: 2,772 square feet A-35 The west side of Hermosa from Lemon to 125 feet north of Highland, the parkway on the south side of Lemon from 621 feet west of Hermosa to Hermosa. Ground Cover area: 10,494 square feet Hardscape area: 9,207 square feet Mulchscape area: 2,370 square feet A-36 The south side of Lemon from 385 feet west of Mayberry to Cartilla. Ground Cover area: 4,850 square feet Hardscape area: 4,915 square feet A-37 The south side of Hillside north and south of the equestrian trail from Beryl to 203 feet east of Eastwood. Ground Cover area: 4,900 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #04 P898 A-38 The median in the 9200 block of Monte Vista. Ground Cover area: 500 square feet Hardscape area: 1,380 square feet A-39 The south side of Almond from Henry to Sapphire. The west side of Sapphire from Almond to 255 feet south of Bella Vista. Ground Cover area: 6,926 square feet A-40 The parkway on the east side of Jasper from Hunter to Highland. The parkway on the south side of Highland from Jasper to Carnelian. The west side of Carnelian from Highland to 210 feet south of Highland. Ground Cover area: 14,858 square feet Hardscape area: 6,040 square feet A-41 The west side of Sapphire from 236 feet north of Thoroughbred to Banyan. Ground Cover area: 1,784 square feet Hardscape area: 812 square feet A-42 The parkway on the west side of Beryl from 132 feet north of Sunflower to Banyan. Ground Cover area: 4,735 square feet Hardscape area: 5,772 square feet A-43 The north side of Base Line from Topaz to the Cucamonga Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 4,563 square feet Hardscape area: 1,890 square feet A-44 The cutouts on the west side of Sapphire from Banyan to Marble. Ground Cover area: 7,300 square feet A-45 The mainline for this site was connected to A-46 on September 8, 1999. A-46 The south side of Banyan from Northstar to Zircon. Ground Cover area: 7,448 square feet Hardscape area: 7,890 square feet A-47 The cutouts and vines on the north side of Banyan from 180 feet east of Zircon to 186 feet west of Vineyard. Ground Cover area: 1,300 square feet A-48 The parkway on the west side of Beryl from 452 feet north of Cielito; 158 feet south of Cielito and the easement between 9063 and 9073 Cielito from Cielito to 170 feet south of Cielito. Ground Cover area: 6,916 square feet Hardscape area: 2,440 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #04 A-49 The east side of Carnelian from 662 feet south of Banyan to Banyan; the south side of Banyan from Carnelian to Northstar. Ground Cover area: 5,906 square feet Hardscape area: 6,972 square feet A-50 The north side of Almond from Sapphire to Crest View; the east and west side of Skyline from Almond to 595 feet north of Almond. Ground Cover area: 17,600 square feet Hardscape area: 8,680 square feet A-51 The planter adjacent to the equestrian trail; from Haven to Riverwood, north of County flood retention basin, west of Chaffey College. The west side of Haven from 400 feet north of Amber to 270 feet south of Amber, and the north and south side of Amber from Haven to San Felipe. Ground Cover area: 37,977 square feet Hardscape area: 5,458 square feet A-52 The east side of Riverwood, from 188 feet south of Charwood to 193 feet north of Charwood. Ground Cover area: 2,750 square feet Hardscape area: 1,698 square feet A-53 The west side of Jasper from Hunter to Highland. The south side of Highland from Jasper to 308 feet west of Sard. The east and west side of Sard from Highland to Hunter. Ground Cover area: 7,445 square feet Hardscape area: 4,740 square feet A-54 The west side of Beryl from 233 feet north of Mignonette to Mignonette. Ground Cover area: 2,637 square feet Hardscape area: 932 square feet A-55 The north side of 19th from Cartilla to Mayberry. The east side of Mayberry from 19th to Heather. Ground Cover area: 8,410 square feet Hardscape area: 5,060 square feet A-56 The east side of Beryl from 410 feet north of Wilson to Wilson. The north side of Wilson from Beryl to 731 feet west of Buckthorn. The south side of Wilson from Buckthorn to Beryl. Ground Cover area: 19,708 square feet Hardscape area: 5,436 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #04 P900 A-57 The east side of Hermosa from 115 feet north of Coca to 451 feet north of Coca. The trail north of water retention basin from Hermosa to 619 feet east of Hermosa. Ground Cover area: 9,406 square feet Hardscape area: 6,794 square feet A-58 The west side of Haven from 510 feet south of Victoria to 1005 feet south of Victoria. Ground Cover area: 7,301 square feet Hardscape area: 4,790 square feet A-59 The east side of Archibald from 820 feet south of Lemon to 448 feet south of Lemon and continues from 275 feet south of Lemon to 185 south of Lemon. Ground Cover area: 4,777 square feet Hardscape area: 5,041 square feet A-60 The south side of Lemon from 290 feet east of Archibald to London. The west side of London from Lemon to Orange. Ground Cover area: 2,569 square feet Hardscape area: 4,122 square feet A-61 The north side of Carrari from London to Archibald. Ground Cover area: 25,152 square feet Hardscape area: 1,698 square feet A-62 The east side of Archibald from Carrari to 505 feet north of Meadowood. Ground Cover area: 8,626 square feet Hardscape area: 1,824 square feet A-63 The south side of Almond from Carriage to Almond. Ground Cover area: 3,342 square feet Hardscape area: 3,600 square feet A-64 The east side of Beryl from Cottonwood to Wilson. The south side of Wilson from Beryl to 437 feet east of Beryl. The north side of Wilson from Cousins to 474 feet east of Cousins. Ground Cover area: 11,973 square feet Hardscape area: 9,949 square feet A-65 The east side of Archibald from La Gloria to 328 feet north of La Gloria. Ground Cover area: 2,279 square feet Hardscape area: 2,411 square feet A-66 The east side of Hermosa from Waterford to 500 feet north of Waterford. Ground Cover area: 4,695 square feet Hardscape area: 5,947 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #04 P9O1 A-67 The south side of 19th from 220 feet east of Sapphire to Via Serena. Ground Cover area: 3,208 square feet Hardscape area: 4,158 square feet A-68 The west side of Haven from Hillside to 783 feet south of Hillside. Ground Cover area: 3,492 square feet A-69 The north side of Hillside from 27 feet west of Mayberry to 191 feet west of Mayberry. Ground Cover area: 1,002 square feet Hardscape area: 1,605 square feet A-70 The south side of 19th from 365 feet west of Amethyst to Amethyst. The west side of Amethyst from 19th to Hedges. Ground Cover area: 6,435 square feet Hardscape area: 7,015 square feet A-71 The west side of Archibald from Hillside to Wilson. The north side of Wilson, south of the trail fence area from Archibald to 467 feet west of Archibald. Ground Cover area: 9,265 square feet Hardscape area: 2,609 square feet A-72 The south side of Banyan from 420 feet west of Archibald to Archibald. The west side of Archibald from Banyan to 389 feet south of Banyan. Ground Cover area: 10,270 square feet Hardscape area: 6,673 square feet A-73 The west side of Beryl from 300 feet north of San Simeon to 130 feet north of San Simeon. Ground Cover area: 1,200 square feet Hardscape area: 600 square feet A-74 The south side of Highland from Beryl St to Hellman. Ground Cover area: 11,603 square feet A-75 The south side of Highland from Amethyst to 612 feet east of Archibald. Ground Cover area: 106,409 square feet Hardscape area: 60,608 square feet A-76 The west side of Archibald from 635 feet north of Hillside to Hillside. The north side of Hillside from Archibald to 770 feet west of Archibald. Ground Cover area: 8,859 square feet Hardscape area: 1,389 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #04 P9O2 A-77 The east side of Carnelian from Brilliant to Wilson including the irrigation cut-outs along trail. The south side of Wilson from Carnelian to 745 feet east of Arabian. The irrigation cut-outs on the north side of Wilson from Carnelian to 775 feet east of Arabian. Ground Cover area: 5,101 square feet Hardscape area: 11,322 square feet B-1 The median on Blue Gum from Etiwanda to Blue Gum. Ground Cover area: 5,100 square feet B-2 The north side of Highland from the Deer Creek Channel to San Benito. The north side of 19th from San Benito to Palm. The west and east side of Alameda from 19th to Ring. The east side of Palm from 19th to Ring. Ground Cover area: 47,397 square feet Hardscape area: 26,285 square feet B-3 The paseo from Sutter to Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 294 square feet Hardscape area: 400 square feet B-4 The north side of Banyan from Deer Creek Channel to 355 feet west of Fredericksburg. Ground Cover area: 9,200 square feet Hardscape area: 3,834 square feet B-5 The north side of Lemon from Semillion to 188 feet west of Terracina. Ground Cover area: 14,472 square feet Hardscape area: 3,894 square feet B-6 The north side of Lemon from Barsac to Semillion. Ground Cover area: 15,784 square feet Hardscape area: 3,780 square feet B-7 The south side of Banyan from Cabernet to 414 feet east of Cabernet. Ground Cover area: 18,814 square feet B-8 The south side of Banyan from Callaway to Muscat. Ground Cover area: 10,505 square feet B-9 The east side of Haven from Banyan to 240 feet north of Banyan. The north side of Banyan from Haven to Merlot. Ground Cover area: 24,975 square feet Hardscape area: 1,356 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #04 P903 B-10 The east side of Haven from 400 feet south of Banyan to Banyan. The south side of Banyan from Haven to Callaway. Ground Cover area: 14,548 square feet Hardscape area: 6,348 square feet B-11 The south side of Banyan from Muscat to Cabernet. Ground Cover area: 33,282 square feet B-12 The north side of Lemon from Barsac to 135 feet east of Valinda. Ground Cover area: 13,464 square feet Hardscape area: 4,098 square feet B-13 The south side of 19th from Inyo to 585 feet east of San Benito. The parkways on the east and west side of San Benito from 19th to San Mateo. The east side of Inyo from 19th to paseo south of 19th and the paseo running east from Inyo to Sonora. Ground Cover area: 20,950 square feet Hardscape area: 14,192 square feet B-14 The paseo from San Benito and Sonora to the Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 2,000 square feet Hardscape area: 540 square feet B-15 The paseo from Stanislaus and Lavine to the Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 1,040 square feet Hardscape area: 428 square feet B-16 The paseo from Inyo to Mendocino. Ground Cover area: 225 square feet Hardscape area: 184 square feet B-17 The paseo from Yuba to Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 918 square feet Hardscape area: 420 square feet B-18 The south side of Wilson from 377 feet west of Canistel to 1032 feet east of Canistel. Ground Cover area: 6,762 square feet Hardscape area: 8,454 square feet B-19 The east side of Haven from the Southern Pacific Railroad to 341 feet south of Victoria. Ground Cover area: 6,415 square feet Hardscape area: 8,865 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #04 P904 B-20 The east side of Haven from 341 feet south of Victoria to Victoria; the south side of Victoria from Haven to 237 feet east of Mango. Ground Cover area: 16,900 square feet Hardscape area: 8,767 square feet B-21 The south side of 19th from Valinda to Inyo. Ground Cover area: 3,900 square feet Hardscape area: 3,700 square feet B-22 The south side of Lemon south of the sidewalk from 188 feet west of Terracina to 284 feet north of Marbella. The parkway on the south side of Lemon from 188 feet west of Terracina to 517 feet north of Marbella. The turf in the parkway at the end of the cul- de-sac on Sonterra. The parkway on the north side of Lemon from 188 feet west of Terracina to 526 feet south of Terracina. The north side of Lemon north of the sidewalk from 188 feet west of Terracina to 562 feet south of Terracina. The turf in the parkway at the end of the cul-de-sac at Serena. Ground Cover area: 17,688 square feet Turf area: 6,390 square feet Hardscape area: 4,928 square feet B-23 The parkway on the east side of Lemon from 129 feet south of Marbella to 526 feet south of Terracina. The slope on the east side of Lemon east of the sidewalk from 129 feet south of Marbella to 562 feet south of Terracina. The west side of Lemon west of the sidewalk from 284 feet north of Marbella to 129 feet south of Marbella. The parkway on the west side of Lemon from 517 feet north of Marbella to 129 feet south of Marbella. Ground Cover area: 22,531 square feet Hardscape area: 4,468 square feet B-24 The south side of Highland from 327 feet west of Deer Creek Channel to Deer Creek Channel. The paseo from Los Osos to Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 4,946 square feet Hardscape area: 2,099 square feet B-25 The south side of Banyan from 152 feet west of Cantabria to 930 feet east of Cantabria. Ground Cover area: 16,693 square feet B-26 The north side of Wilson from 590 feet west of High Meadow to 187 feet east of High Meadow. Ground Cover area: 4,628 square feet Hardscape area: 390 square feet B-27 The east side of Haven from 467 feet north of 19th to 650 feet north of 19th. Ground Cover area: 3,483 square feet Hardscape area: 6,235 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #04 P9O5 C-1 The north side of 26th from Andover to Hermosa. The east side of Hermosa from 26th to 331 feet north of Concord. Ground Cover area: 22,227 square feet Hardscape area: 5,532 square feet C-2 The entry monument on the northeast and northwest corners of 4th and Archibald. Ground Cover area: 6,337 square feet Hardscape area: 3,998 square feet C-3 The south side of Base Line from Ramona to 128 feet east of Cambridge. Ground Cover area: 17,262 square feet Hardscape area: 4,865 square feet C-4 The south side of Base Line from 440 feet west of Ramona to Ramona. Ground Cover area: 6,198 square feet Hardscape area: 2,200 square feet C-5 The south side of Base Line from 340 feet west of Center to 103 feet east of Center. Ground Cover area: 8,850 square feet Hardscape area: 2,215 square feet C-6 The south side of Base Line from Ivy to 105 feet west of Marine. Ground Cover area: 8,080 square feet Hardscape area: 2,475 square feet C-7 The parkway on the north side of Church from 142 feet east of Teak to 230 feet west of Teak. Ground Cover area: 1,813 square feet Hardscape area: 1,650 square feet C-8 The west side of Hermosa from 524 feet north of Palo Alto to 142 feet south of Palo Alto. Ground Cover area: 2,650 square feet Hardscape area: 3,996 square feet C-9 The parkway on the west side of Hermosa from 163 feet north of Ironwood to 145 feet south of Ironwood. Ground Cover area: 1,500 square feet Hardscape area: 1,848 square feet C-10 The entry monument parkway on the south side of Base Line from the western city limit to Alta Cuesta. Ground Cover area: 9,756 square feet Hardscape area: 4,380 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 16 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #04 P906 C-11 The parkway on the east side of Beryl from Alder to 135 feet north of Culpepper. Ground Cover area: 3,400 square feet Hardscape area: 3,600 square feet C-12 The parkway on the east side of Hellman from Tryon to 665 feet north of Tryon. Ground Cover area: 8,280 square feet Hardscape area: 3,325 square feet C-13 The parkway on the west side of Hellman from 500 feet north of Church to Church. Ground Cover area: 2,416 square feet Hardscape area: 3,000 square feet C-14 The east side of Archibald from 196 feet north of Palo Alto to 530 feet north of Palo Alto. Ground Cover area: 4,262 square feet Hardscape area: 1,374 square feet C-15 The north side of San Bernardino from Summerlin to 225 feet west of Summerlin. Ground Cover area: 1,660 square feet Hardscape area: 710 square feet C-16 The south side of Base Line from 286 feet west of Hermosa to Hermosa. The raised planter on the southwest corner of Base Line and Hermosa. Ground Cover area: 4,190 square feet Hardscape area: 2,320 square feet C-17 The east side of Hellman from 775 feet south of 6th to 6th. The south side of 6th from Hellman to Golden Oak. The west side of Golden Oak from 6th to Foxbrook. Ground Cover area: 9,058 square feet Hardscape area: 6,387 square feet D-1 The east side of Rochester from Church to Base Line. Ground Cover area: 27,920 square feet Hardscape area: 17,301 square feet D-2 The east side of Rochester from 146 feet south of Chervil to Church. Ground Cover area: 21,858 square feet Hardscape area: 13,263 square feet D-3 The south side of Base Line from Rochester to 600 feet east of Rochester. Ground Cover area: 2,180 square feet Hardscape area: 4,121 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 17 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #04 P9O7 D-4 The north and south sides of Church from Rochester to 150 feet east of Hyssop. Ground Cover area: 6,340 square feet Hardscape area: 8,887 square feet The Haven median from the 210 freeway to Alta Loma. Ground Cover area: 2,207 square feet H-10 The Haven median from entrance of Haven Village to Amber. Ground Cover area: 6,968 square feet Converted 5,131 square feet of turf to ground cover effective April 1, 2013. Area listed is the 50% maintained by LMD 1. An equal amount is maintained by General Fund as of March 25, 2013 H-11 The Haven median from Amber to Olive. Ground Cover area: 5,026 square feet Converted 3,475 square feet of turf to ground cover effective April 1, 2013. Area listed is the 50% maintained by LMD 1. An equal amount is maintained by General Fund as of March 25, 2013 H-12 The Haven median from Olive to 712 feet north of Wilson. Ground Cover area: 6,734 square feet Converted 3,933 square feet of turf to ground cover effective April 1, 2013. Area listed is the 50% maintained by LMD 1. An equal amount is maintained by General Fund as of March 25, 2013 H-13 The Haven median from 19th to the 210 freeway. Ground Cover area: 12,514 square feet FH -18 The Foothill median from East to 453 feet east of Cornwall. Ground Cover area: 5,450 square feet Parks, ground cover, shrubs and turf areas that make up parkways, median islands and paseos are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company. Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 18 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #04 ��j• i1l;ifii 1•�• Grove Av Vineyard Av Hellman Av '-'�± I V Archibald Av I� Hermosa Av Hawn Av I NIII&on I Rochostor I EtWonda Av S East Av 1-0 Carrwllan St y tf k 1 1 1 1 < Hellman Ave y • ■ CL `y—gyp OOSS x Hermosa Av R Haven Av I 1 !y r 1 m m d Q CD 3 V) � p T Carrwllan St y tf k $ m < Hellman Ave y r Archibald Av CL Cherry Av a T is P9O8 1 Carrwllan St y iF 7� s Hellman Ave y Archibald Av `y—gyp OOSS x Hermosa Av R Haven Av I 1 !y 1 Nilliken Av t I i n �._._._._._._ I ...... Day Creek BI 1 O Etlwanda Av 1 `, 1 1 East Av 1 1 � 1 1 1 1 -_ r i Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 19 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #04 P909 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the District levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Expenditures Personnel Services: Regular Salaries Overtime Salaries Part-time Salaries Subtotal - Personnel Operations and Maintenance: Operations and Maintenance: O & M/General O & MWFacilities Vehicle Operations and Maintenance Emergency Equipment and Vehicle Rental Equipment Operations and Maintenance Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance Contract Services: Contract Services/General Contract Services/Facilities Tree Maintenance Subtotal - Contract Services Utilities: Telephone Utilities Water Utilities Electric Utilities Subtotal - Utilities Assessment Administration Admin./General Overhead Other Expenses Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance Capital Expenditures: Fiscal Year 2017/18 Budget $ 17,230 5,000 8,990 31,220 75,000 2,300 2,000 2,800 2,000 84,100 608,960 7,600 52,500 669,060 2,790 290,000 87,100 379,890 66,090 40,960 660 1,240,760 Captial Outlay - Improvements Other Than Building 40,500 Transfers Out: Transfers Out - LK/ID #1 Capital Reserve Fund 90,000 Total Expenditures Budget $ 1,402,480 Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 20 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #04 P910 Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection Subtotal - Taxes Other Revenues: Interest Earnings Other Rental/Lease Income Park Maintenance Fees Sports Field User Group Rentals Sports Lighting Fees Other Revenue Subtotal - Other Revenues: Transfer In: Fiscal Year 2017/18 Budget $ 1,228,530 13,900 1,242,430 10,480 24,910 4,450 1,000 22,290 100 63,230 Transfer In - General Fund 123,410 Transfer In - LIVID #1 Operating Fund 90,000 Subtotal - Transfer In: 213,410 Total Revenues Budget $ 1,519,070 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ 116,590 Total Gross Estimated Assessments $ 1,240,932.21 Total District EBU Count 13,457.68 Actual Assessment per EBU - Fiscal Year 2017/18 $ 92.21 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU - Fiscal Year 2017/18 $ 92.21 The maximum allowable assessment per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however, it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. Beginning with Fiscal Year 2016/17 the City Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 21 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #04 P911 will maintain a Capital Reserve Fund to be used for deferred maintenance and pending capital projects. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Operating Capital Total Reserve Reserve Reserve Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2017 $1,133,368 $ 50,180 $1,183,548 Contribution to Reserve - Fiscal Year 2017/18 66,110 50,480 116,590 Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2018 $1,199,478 $100,660 $1,300,138 Definitions of Budaet Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time and part-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Additionally, this includes benefits available to City employees. Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District. Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Utilities: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity, water, and telephone services, as required, for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers in the District. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost of all particular departments and staff of the City, as well as consultants, for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual Engineer's Report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all central services departments of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational District within the City's administrative structure. Capital Outlay: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 22 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #04 P912 Other Revenues: This includes other revenues that are not levied through the annual assessments that support the District operations. These other revenues may include: interest earnings, other rental/lease income (cell site tower leases), Park Maintenance Fees, Sports Field User Group Rentals, and parking permits (Metrolink Station paid parking). METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Overview Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 commencing with Section 5000) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]. Section 22547 of the 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement." Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights -of -ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 23 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #04 P913 General Benefit Section 4 of Article XIII D of the California Constitution provides that once a local agency which proposes to impose assessments on property has identified those parcels that will have special benefits conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed, the local agency must next "separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred," and only the special benefits can be included in the amount of the assessments imposed. In this District, the improvements being financed consists of the maintenance of local improvements located within the boundaries of the District and include paseos, street trees, landscaped areas, Parks - Bear Gulch Park, East and West Beryl Park, Old Town Park, Church Street Park, Golden Oaks Park, Hermosa Park, and the undeveloped Don Tiburcio Tapia Park and appurtenant facilities that are located throughout the General City and were installed to create a common landscape theme and neighborhood identity for parcels within the District. The improvements are situated within the public rights-of-way of the internal local street network within the General City which provides ingress and egress for parcels within the District to access the City's system of arterial streets. City residents and traffic from parcels not within the District do not use the internal local street network or paseos except for the express purpose of accessing properties located within the District, and therefore do not benefit from the improvements. Only parcels which are within the District and proximate to the improvements and within the District are being assessed. Accordingly, there is a direct physical and visual nexus between each parcel being assessed and the improvements to be funded by the assessment that does not exist for parcels outside of the District boundary and that is particular and distinct from that shared by the public at large. Under these circumstances, all of the benefits conferred are direct and local in nature, and provide a benefit to only those parcels located within the boundaries of the District. Based upon this, it has been determined that there is no quantifiable general benefit to the surrounding community and the public in general from the maintenance of the improvements within the boundaries of the District, and therefore no portion of the project costs should be attributed to general benefit. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District and, as such, confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 24 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #04 P914 specifically for the properties within the District, only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements is identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined; however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since Fiscal Year 1996/97. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The EBU method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one EBU. Every other land -use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land -use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land -use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land -Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Property Type (County Use Code) EBU Value Multiplier Single Family Residential 1.00 Parcel Multi -Family Residential 0.50 Unit Non -Residential 2.00 Acre The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 25 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #04 P915 The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2017/18 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the San Bernardino County Assessor Office, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 26 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #04 Maximum Allowable Actual Assessment Assessment Total Units/ Property Type(County Use Code Rate per EBU Rate per EBU Acres Total EBUs Single Family Residential $92.21 $92.21 8,329.00 8,329.00 Multi -Family Residential 92.21 92.21 10,222.00 5,111.00 Non -Residential 192.211 92.211 8.83 17.68 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the San Bernardino County Assessor Office, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 26 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #04 P916 Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 27 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #04 -n }ssi:t�j Grove Av Grove Carnelian St Vineyrnard Av Hellman Av Hellman Av Archibald Av Archibald Av Hermosa Av Hermosa Av Haven Av Haven Av Milliken Av Milliken Av l�.-.�-..—.�..i +.! Rochester Av Rochester Av Day Creek BI i i r Etiwanda Av Etiwanda Av! 0. 5� East Av y D o 0 L r M M Cherry Av C' Q r o n � z c� Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 27 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #04 P917 ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2017/18 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2017/18 actual assessments for the District: Property Type (County Use Code) Actual Assessment Rate per EBU Total Units/Acres Total EBUs Actual Allowable Assessment Single Family Residential $92.21 8,329.00 8,329.00 $768,017.09 Multi -Family Residential 92.21 10,222.00 5,111.00 471,285.31 Non -Residential 92.21 8.83 17.68 1,630.27 Totals 10/19/2016 18,559.831 13,457.681 $1,240,932.67 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations The following annexations are effective for Fiscal Year 2017/18: Apn Annexation Date Project Name Total Units/Acres Total EBUs Property Type 1061-611-15 08/03/2016 DRC2014-00893 1.00 1.00 Single Family Residential 0209-111-20 10/19/2016 DRC2014-00388 1.00 1.00 Single Family Residential 1061-691-04 10/19/2016 TR18961 7.00 7.00 Single Family Residential 0209-123-05 11/02/2016 DRC2013-00896 1.00 1.00 Single Family Residential Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 28 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #04 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2017/18 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (Victoria Neighborhood Parks) P918 AJI,irli mpm�- # 0-5 P919 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (Victoria Neighborhood Parks) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2700 Fax: 909.477.2849 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Lynne B. Kennedy, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Sam Spagnolo, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director P920 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER 1 INTRODUCTION 3 Reason for Assessment 3 Process for Annual Assessment 3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 4 Description of the Boundaries of the District 4 Description of Improvements and Services 4 Map of Improvements 19 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 21 District Budget 21 Definitions of Budget Items 23 BENEFITS FROM IMPROVEMENTS AND QUANTIFICATION 24 Benefits from Improvements 24 Quantification of Benefit 26 Sidewalks and Community Trails 26 Street Landscaping 28 Neighborhood Parks 33 Collective General Benefit 35 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 35 Overview 35 Apportioning of Special Benefit 36 Rate per Benefit Unit 42 Method of Assessment Spread 42 Applying the Method of Assessment Spread 42 Proposed Maximum Assessment Rates Cost of Living Inflator ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS Assessment Roll Annexations 45 45 46 48 48 48 P921 P922 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on June 21, 2017 the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 17-045, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (Victoria Neighborhood Parks) (hereafter, referred to as the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed staff to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2017/18 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #05 Fiscal Year 2017/18 Budget Expenditures Personnel Services $ 919,100 Operations and Maintenance 2,786,870 Capital Expenditures 430,200 Total Expenditures Budget 4,136,170 Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies 3,372,930 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 34,730 Subtotal - Taxes 3,407,660 Other Revenues 33,760 Transfer In 293,490 Total Revenues Budget 3,734,910 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ (401,260) Total District EBU Count 76,613.33 Actual Assessment per EBU $ 44.47 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU $ 44.47 Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #05 P923 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. 2. 1 have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, I certify that the Annual Engineer's Report and Assessment Diagram included herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #05 P924 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement or facility such as paseos, community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, and providing for the growth, vigor and care of the trees and landscape plant materials. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting of landscape or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the District for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the District by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the District. • Refers to the Engineer's Report, on file with the City Clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the City Clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #05 P925 hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including the improvements, to the zones within the District, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. PLANS AND SPECIFI CA TIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area located south of the 210 Freeway, west of Etiwanda, southwest of the 1-15 Freeway, and east of Haven, also known as the Victoria Neighborhood Parks and Landscape Maintenance District, and are more particularly in the diagram of the District included herein. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements located in and serviced and maintained by the District generally include: the landscaping and associated landscape lighting and irrigation systems installed along the roadways, medians, and community trails; sidewalks; and six neighborhood parks that are of direct and special benefit to the parcels within the District. These improvements are located within the public right-of-ways and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, pruning, fertilizing, mowing, weeding, pest control, removal of trash/debris/graffiti, and irrigation of the trees, shrubs, vines, ground cover, and turf. Maintenance of associated improvements, including the parks and irrigation systems, includes but is not limited to, the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of the improvement or facility; grading and replacement of trail surfacing; trail fence repair and replacement; and irrigation systems control, adjustment, repair Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #05 P926 and replacement. Servicing means the furnishing of water for the irrigation of landscaping, the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting of landscaping or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include materials, vehicles, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Parks: Ellena Park, Kenyon Park, Victoria Arbors Park, Victoria Groves Park, Vintage Park, and Windrows Park Site # Descriptive Location 2-1 The west side of Arbor from the traffic circle to Church. The Arbor median from Church to the traffic circle. The east side of Arbor from Long Meadow to Church. The paseo from the west side of Arbor to Day Creek. The paseo from the west side of Arbor to Saintsbury. The north side of Winery from Arbor to 214 feet west of Arbor. The south side of Long Meadow from Freestone to Duck Creek. Ground Cover area: 93,639 square feet Hardscape area: 59,041 square feet 2-2 The northwest corner of Day Creek and Church. The north side of Church from Day Creek to 1,152 feet west of Hess. The paseo from the north side of Church to Dry Creek. The paseo from the north side of Church to Pine Ridge. The west side of Hess from the north side of Church to Dry Creek. The south side of Church from 145 feet east of Hyssop to 896 feet east of Hyssop. Ground Cover area: 24,018 square feet Hardscape area: 26,617 square feet 2-3 The west side of Day Creek from 250 feet north of Appellation to Church. The east side of Day Creek from Church to Madrigal. The Day Creek median from Church to Base Line. The south side of Madrigal from Day Creek to Roundhill. Ground Cover area: 35,420 square feet Hardscape area: 42,671 square feet 2-4 Victoria Park from Base Line to the east entrance of Arbor Park. The southwest corner of Victoria Park and Base Line. The southeast corner of Victoria Park to 445 feet east of Victoria Park. Ground Cover area: 36,482 square feet Turf area: 3,874 square feet Hardscape area: 32,927 square feet 2-5 The east and west side of Victoria Park and the medians from Mosaic to Church. Ground Cover area: 56,358 square feet Hardscape area: 20,390 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #05 P927 2-6 The north side of Church from Arbor to Day Creek. The northwest corner of Church and Arbor. The paseo from the north side of Church to Wilson Creek. Ground Cover area: 21,616 square feet Hardscape area: 15,159 square feet 2-7 The north side of Church from Victoria Park to Arbor. The northwest corner of Victoria Park and Church. The paseo from the north side of Church to Elk Cove. The paseo from the north side of Church to Freestone. The northeast corner of Arbor and Church. Ground Cover area: 16,609 square feet Hardscape area: 13,730 square feet 2-8 The paseo from the west side of Etiwanda to Silver Rose. The north side of Church from Etiwanda to Victoria Park. The east side of Iron Horse from Church to Wild Horse. The paseo from the north side of Church to Cloudy Bay. The medians from Iron Horse to Etiwanda. Ground Cover area: 35,122 square feet Hardscape area: 28,473 square feet 2-9 The landscaped slope behind existing landscape of site 2-5 on the west side of Victoria Park from 475 feet north of Long Meadow to Long Meadow. The landscape slope and curb adjacent parkway from Victoria Park to 685 feet west of Victoria Park. Ground Cover area: 26,213 square feet Hardscape area: 5,617 square feet VW -1 Base Line median from Victoria Park to 830 feet west of Victoria Park. Ground Cover area: 4,514 square feet Hardscape area: 3,474 square feet VW -2 The north side of Base Line 300 feet east and 200 feet west of Swanson. The east and west sides of Swanson from Base Line to Province. The paseo from the intersection of Swanson and Province to Atwood with outlet to Dunmore. The paseo from Atwood to the Southern Pacific Railroad. The north side of Saratoga from Powell to Dunmore. The paseo from Saratoga to Etiwanda. The south side of Atwood from Victoria Park to Travis. The north side of Atwood from Walcott to Victoria Park. Ground Cover area: 18,753 square feet Turf area: 73,931 square feet Hardscape area: 22,615 square feet VW -3 The Victoria Park median and the west and east side parkways from Base Line to the entrance to Victoria Village. Ground Cover area: 27,090 square feet Hardscape area: 3,214 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #05 P928 VW -4 The Victoria Park median and the west and east side parkways from Victoria Village entrance to Atwood. Ground Cover area: 40,937 square feet Hardscape area: 6,428 square feet VW -5 The Victoria Park median and the west side and east side parkways from Atwood to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground Cover area: 49,513 square feet Hardscape area: 5,467 square feet VW -6 The paseo running north from 12732 Farrington to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground Cover area: 285 square feet Hardscape area: 679 square feet VW -7 The paseo running north from 12840 Farrington to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground Cover area: 266 square feet Hardscape area: 552 square feet VW -8 The Victoria Park median and the west side parkway from the Southern Pacific Railroad to South Victoria Windrows. The Victoria Park east side parkway from the Southern Pacific Railroad to Zinnia. Ground Cover area: 40,548 square feet Hardscape area: 6,150 square feet VW -9 The Victoria Park east side parkway from Barberry to North Victoria Windrows at Windrows Park. Ground Cover area: 40,004 square feet Turf area: 11,779 square feet Hardscape area: 3,720 square feet VW -10 The west side of Victoria Park from South Victoria Windrows to Dahlia. The Victoria Park median from Zinnia to Dahlia. The east side of Victoria Park from North Victoria Windrows at Windrows Park to Dahlia. Ground Cover area: 50,620 square feet Turf area: 11,878 square feet Hardscape area: 11,400 square feet VW -11 The east side parkway on South Victoria Windrows from Silktassel to Victoria Park. The parkway on the south side of Victoria Park from the intersection of South Victoria Windrows and North Victoria Windrows to Dahlia. The Victoria Park median from the intersection of North and South Victoria Windrows to Dahlia. The parkway on the north side of Victoria Windrows from the intersection of North and South Victoria Windrows to Dahlia. Ground Cover area: 27,053 square feet Turf area: 20,216 square feet Hardscape area: 6,988 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #05 P929 VW -12 The Victoria Park median from the intersection of North and South Victoria Windrows to 390 feet east of Day Creek. The parkway on the north side of Victoria Park from the intersection of North and South Victoria Windrows to 390 feet east of Day Creek. The parkway on the west side of north Victoria Windrows from Silverberry to Victoria Park. The parkway on the south side of Silverberry from 390 feet east of Day Creek to North Victoria Windrows. Ground Cover area: 166,249 square feet Turf area: 21,603 square feet Hardscape area: 12,868 square feet VW -13 The parkway on the south side of Victoria Park from 390 feet east of Day Creek to South Victoria Windrows. The west side of South Victoria Windrows from Victoria Park to Snapdragon. Ground Cover area: 20,068 square feet Turf area: 16,476 square feet Hardscape area: 7,200 square feet VW -14 The parkway on the west side of South Victoria Windrows from Snapdragon to Victoria Park. The parkway on the north and south side of Sugargum from South Victoria Windrows to 390 feet east of Day Creek. The parkways on the east and west sides of Basswood from Sugargum to Blazing Star. The parkway on the north side of South Victoria Windrows from Victoria Park to Silktassel. Ground Cover area: 21,466 square feet Turf area: 10,335 square feet Hardscape area: 27,560 square feet VW -15 The parkway on the north side of Bougainvillea from Peach to North Victoria Windrows. The parkway on the east side of North Victoria Windrows from Bougainvillea to Citrus. The parkway on the north side of North Victoria Windrows from Locust and following that curb line to Silverberry. The parkway on the north side of Silverberry from North Victoria Windrows 390 feet east of Day Creek. The paseo from North Victoria Windrows at Silverberry to Nasturtium. The paseo from North Victoria Windrows at Locust to Pistachio and continuing to Bougainvillea. Ground Cover area: 45,929 square feet Turf area: 12,207 square feet Hardscape area: 23,630 square feet VW -16 The south side of Highland from 455 feet east of Day Creek to 534 feet east of Locust. The east and west side of Locust from Highland to North Victoria Windrows. The parkway on the south side of North Victoria Windrows from Citrus east to Bougainvillea. The parkway on the north side of North Victoria Windrows from Twinspur to Locust. Ground Cover area: 26,577 square feet Turf area: 23,922 square feet Hardscape area: 19,203 square feet VW -17 This site was modified and added to VW -16 on January 5, 1999. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #05 P93O VW -18 The south side of Highland from 12583 Highland to Rockrose. Ground Cover area: 2,800 square feet Turf area: 8,515 square feet Hardscape area: 3,325 square feet VW -19 The north side of North Victoria Windrows from Rosemary to Rockrose. The east side of Rockrose from North Victoria Windrows to Highland. The south side of Highland from Rockrose to Etiwanda. The horse trail from Highland and Etiwanda to the Fire Station. Ground Cover area: 21,027 square feet Turf area: 32,266 square feet Hardscape area: 11,298 square feet VW -20 The parkway on the south side of North Victoria Windrows from Victoria Park to Plum. The parkway on the west side of North Victoria Windrows from Plum to Rosemary. The paseo from Tipu east to the open field. Note: The area in front of Windrows Park is watered by the VW -20 water meter, but it is maintained by City crews. Ground Cover area: 2,110 square feet Turf area: 16,411 square feet Hardscape area: 9,132 square feet VW -21 The east side of North Victoria Windrows from Rosemary to the trail south of Kalmia. The trail and paseo from North Victoria Windrows south of Kalmia to Etiwanda and north to the Fire Station. The south side of Basil from North Victoria Windrows to Santolina. Ground Cover area: 49,187 square feet Turf area: 57,532 square feet Hardscape area: 19,600 square feet VW -22 The paseo from North Victoria Windrows at Rockrose to the northeast corner of Windrows Park and from that corner to Plum. Ground Cover area: 13,689 square feet Turf area: 19,953 square feet Hardscape area: 9,489 square feet VW -23 The west side of Rockrose from Highland to North Victoria Windrows. The parkway on the north side of North Victoria Windrows from Rockrose to Twinspur. The parkway on the south side of North Victoria Windrows from Bougainvillea to Rosemary. Ground Cover area: 18,299 square feet Turf area: 3,452 square feet Hardscape area: 10,352 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #05 P931 VW -24 The Metropolitan Water District easement from Jasmine and Ironbark to Sweet Gum. Ground Cover area: 475 square feet Hardscape area: 4,730 square feet VW -25 The north side of Base Line from 384 feet west of Wanona to Etiwanda. The west side of Etiwanda from Base Line to Craig. The Base Line median from Swanson to Etiwanda. Ground Cover area: 20,934 square feet Turf area: 3,079 square feet Hardscape area: 12,799 square feet VW -26 The paseo from Grape to 630 feet west of Grape. Ground Cover area: 7,021 square feet Hardscape area: 8,548 square feet VW -27 The south side of Base Line from 251 feet west of Swanson to Etiwanda. The Base Line median from Victoria Park to Swanson. Ground Cover area: 18,816 square feet Hardscape area: 17,233 square feet VG -1 The turf and ground cover on the south side of Highland from the Deer Creek Channel to Fairmont. The turf and ground cover from Highland on the west side of Fairmont to Victoria Park. The ground cover on the north side of Victoria Park south of the horse trail from 475 feet east of Milliken to Fairmont. The turf on the north side of Victoria Park from 275 feet east of Milliken to Fairmont. The turf in the parkway on the east side of Fairmont from Victoria Park to Highland. Ground Cover area: 21,573 square feet Turf area: 47,604 square feet Hardscape area: 17,300 square feet VG -2 The turf on the east side of York from Delaware to Fairmont. The ground cover on the south side of Fairmont from York and continuing on that curb line to Victoria Park. The turf and ground cover on the south side of Victoria Park west of Milliken from Fairmont to Milliken. The parkway on the west side of Milliken from Victoria Park to Fairmont. The Milliken median from Fairmont to Victoria Park. The turf on the north side of Victoria Park from 273 feet west of Milliken to Milliken. The ground cover on the north side of Victoria Park south of the horse trail from 468 feet west of Milliken to Milliken. Ground Cover area: 53,416 square feet Turf area: 49,587 square feet Hardscape area: 20,173 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #05 P932 VG -3 The turf and ground cover north of the sidewalk on the north side of Fairmont from Nova continuing on that curb line to York and the turf south of the sidewalk on the north side of Fairmont from Armstrong continuing on that curb line to York. The ground cover on the west side of York from Fairmont to Delaware and the ground cover on the east side of York. The turf and ground cover on the west side of Fairmont from Emerson continuing along that curb line to Armstrong. The turf and ground cover on the east and west sides of Biola. Ground Cover area: 57,189 square feet Turf area: 38,343 square feet Hardscape area: 26,848 square feet VG -4 The turf and ground cover on the south side of Fairmont from Armstrong to Milliken. The turf and ground cover on the west side of Milliken from Fairmont to the Southern Pacific Railroad. The Milliken median from Fairmont to the Southern Pacific Railroad. The ground cover on the north side of the Southern Pacific Railroad from Deer Creek Channel to Rochester including the paseo to Baylor. The ground cover on the north side of Fairmont from Milliken to Nova. The turf on the north side of Fairmont from Milliken to Armstrong. Ground Cover area: 202,163 square feet Turf area: 19,751 square feet Hardscape area: 12,278 square feet VG -5 The paseo from Biola to Amarillo to Delaware at York. Ground Cover area: 12,448 square feet Turf area: 44,896 square feet Hardscape area: 7,992 square feet VG -6 The paseo beginning at the northeast corner of Victoria Groves Park and Fairmont and extending to the Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 73,442 square feet Turf area: 74,778 square feet Hardscape area: 16,629 square feet VG -7 The paseo that begins on the south side of Donnelly at Fairmont and continues to the Deer Creek Channel including the southward extension on the west side of Albright from Donnelly to Pacific and the paseo from Pacific to Charleston. Ground Cover area: 43,427 square feet Turf area: 51,765 square feet Hardscape area: 15,806 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #05 P933 VG -8 The ground cover on the west side of Milliken from 566 feet north of Victoria Park to Victoria Park. The ground cover and turf north of the horse trail on Victoria Park from Milliken to Fairmont. The ground cover on the east side of Fairmont from Victoria Park to 156 feet north of Victoria Park. Ground Cover area: 21,614 square feet Turf area: 8,614 square feet Hardscape area: 8,281 square feet VG -9 The ground cover on the east side of Fairmont from 156 feet north of Victoria Park to Kenyon. The ground cover on the south side of Kenyon from Fairmont to 197 feet east of Fairmont. The turf on the south side of Kenyon from Fairmont to 316 feet east of Fairmont. The turf and ground cover on the south side of Baltimore from Fairmont to Baltimore. The turf and ground cover on the north side of Baltimore from Fairmont to Vanderbilt. The turf and ground cover on the east side of Vanderbilt from Baltimore to Brown. The paseo from Vanderbilt and Brown to Kenyon. Ground Cover area: 48,481 square feet Turf area: 11,357 square feet Hardscape area: 13,542 square feet VG -10 The ground cover on the south side of Kenyon from 197 feet east of Fairmont to Milliken. The turf on the south side of Kenyon from 316 feet east of Fairmont to Milliken. The ground cover on the west side of Milliken from Kenyon to 566 feet north of Victoria Park. The turf and ground cover on the west side of Capitol from Brown to Bethany. The paseo from Capitol and Brown to Kenyon. Ground cover area: 34,241 square feet Turf area: 11,031 square feet Hardscape area: 5,320 square feet VG -11 The east and west side parkways and median of Milliken from Base Line to the Southern Pacific Railroad. The north side of Base Line from 542 feet east of Milliken to Milliken. Ground Cover area: 31,367 square feet Turf area: 17,264 square feet Hardscape area: 25,524 square feet VG -12 The turf and ground cover on the south side of Fairmont from the southeast corner of Milliken and Fairmont along the curb line to Victoria Park. The turf and ground over on the west side of Fairmont from the southwest corner of Victoria Park and Fairmont (located east of Milliken) and continuing along the curb line to Milliken. The turf on the east side of Milliken from the Southern Pacific Railroad to 730 feet south of Victoria Park. The ground cover on the east side of Milliken from the Southern Pacific Railroad to 766 feet south of Victoria Park. Ground Cover area: 53,068 square feet Turf area: 36,431 square feet Hardscape area: 27,004 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #05 P934 VG -13 The paseos from Victoria Park to Verona, Verona to Napoli, and Genova to Tivoli. Ground Cover area: 17,993 square feet Turf area: 16,344 square feet Hardscape area: 8,376 square feet VG -14 The Base Line median from Milliken to Ellena East. The turf and ground cover on the north side of Base Line from Ellena East to Ellena West. The turf and ground cover on the east side of Ellena West from Base Line and following the curb line to Kenyon. The north side of Ellena West from Kenyon to Casoli. The turf and ground cover on both sides of Casoli from Ellena West to Candela. The turf and ground cover on both sides of Crema from Ellena west to Candela. Ground Cover area: 80,287 square feet Turf area: 62,999 square feet Hardscape area: 44,826 square feet VG -15 The turf and ground cover on the west side of Rochester from the Southern Pacific Railroad to Base Line. The turf and ground cover on the north side of Base Line from Rochester to Ellena East. The Base Line Median from Rochester to Ellena East. The turf and ground cover on the east side of Ellena east from Base Line and continuing along that curb line to 275 feet north of Berra Road. The turf and ground cover on both sides of Berra from Ellena East to Comiso. Ground Cover area: 54,628 square feet Turf area: 57,306 square feet Hardscape area: 36,014 square feet VG -16 The paseo from Base Line to Ellena West with entrances to Amelia and Pavola. Ground Cover area: 9,661 square feet Turf area: 11,529 square feet Hardscape area: 5,804 square feet VG -17 The paseo from Fairmont to the Southern Pacific Railroad. The paseo from Fabriano to Martano. Ground Cover area: 35,351 square feet Turf area: 40,291 square feet Hardscape area: 16,394 square feet VG -18 The paseo from Rapallo to Gandino and south to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground Cover area: 4,281 square feet Hardscape area: 1,308 square feet VG -19 The paseo from Tolentino to Pizolli and to Tolentino. Ground Cover area: 12,555 square feet Turf area: 17,856 square feet Hardscape area: 7,380 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #05 P935 VG -20 The turf on the east side of Milliken from 730 feet south of Victoria Park to Victoria Park. The ground cover on the east side of Milliken from 766 feet south of Victoria Park to Victoria Park. The turf and ground cover on the south side of Victoria Park from the southeast corner at Milliken heading east to Fairmont. The turf and ground cover on the north side of Victoria Park from Parma to the northeast corner of Milliken and Victoria Park. The ground cover on the west side of Parma from Victoria Park to Lomello. The Victoria Park median from Milliken to Pandino. The Milliken median from Victoria Park to 440 feet south of Kenyon. The parkway on the west side of Milliken from 420 feet south of Kenyon to Victoria Park. Ground Cover area: 96,750 square feet Turf area: 77,461 square feet Hardscape area: 22,177 square feet VG -21 The ground cover on the east side of Parma from Victoria Park to Lomello. The ground cover on the north side of Victoria Park from Parma to 653 feet east of Kenyon. The turf on the north side of Victoria Park from Parma to 547 feet east of Kenyon. The turf and ground cover on the south side of Victoria Park from Fairmont to 422 feet east of Kenyon. The turf and ground cover on the east and west sides of Kenyon from Victoria Park to the Southern Pacific Railroad. The paseo from Kenyon to Rapallo. The paseo from Kenyon to Bari. The Victoria Park median from Pandino to Portofino. Ground Cover area: 85,865 square feet Turf area: 41,994 square feet Hardscape area: 34,478 square feet VG -22 The ground cover on the north side of Victoria Park from 653 feet east of Kenyon to Rochester. The turf on the north side of Victoria Park from 547 feet east of Kenyon to Rochester. The Victoria Park median from Portofino to Rochester. The turf and ground cover on the south side of Victoria Park north of the sidewalk from Kenyon to the east side of Vintage Park. The turf and ground cover on the south side of Victoria Park from the east side of Vintage Park to Rochester. The turf and ground cover on the west side of Rochester from Victoria Park to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground Cover area: 115,144 square feet Turf area: 57,927 square feet Hardscape area: 20,863 square feet VG -23 The turf and ground cover on the east side of Kenyon from Victoria Park to 409 feet west of Grimaldi. The ground cover on the south side of Portofino from Kenyon to Bergano. The turf and ground cover on the north and south side of Lark from Kenyon to the west property line of Rancho Cucamonga High School. The ground cover on the east and west side of Matera from Lark to Pescara. The ground cover on the north and south side of Grimaldi from Kenyon to Brindisi. The turf and ground cover on the west side of Kenyon from Lark to Victoria Park. The ground cover on the north and south side of Marcello from Kenyon to Landriano. The paseo from southwest corner of Kenyon Park to Kenyon. Ground Cover area: 63,733 square feet Turf area: 82,565 square feet Hardscape area: 39,297 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #05 P936 VG -24 The north side of Kenyon from Autumn Glen to Woodruff. The east side of Woodruff from Kenyon to 403 feet north of Kenyon. Ground Cover area: 8,477 square feet Turf area: 5,320 square feet Hardscape area: 5,622 square feet VG -25 The paseo west of Torino from Kenyon to Highland. The turf and ground cover on the south side of Highland from the northwest corner of Tract 13440 to the east end of Tract 13440. Ground Cover area: 40,800 square feet Turf area: 24,134 square feet Hardscape area: 14,353 square feet VG -26 The paseo from Brindisi to Messina. The turf and ground cover on the north side of Brindisi to the end of the cul-de-sac. The turf and ground cover on the west side of Messina from the paseo to Treviso. Ground Cover area: 18,905 square feet Turf area: 1,141 square feet Hardscape area: 3,615 square feet VG -27 The Milliken median from 440 feet south of Kenyon to Highland. The parkway on the west side of Milliken from 420 feet south of Kenyon. Ground Cover area: 4,030 square feet Turf area: 3,006 square feet Hardscape area: 4,222 square feet VG -28 The east side of Rochester from Victoria Park to Highland. Ground Cover area: 60,902 square feet Hardscape area: 5,593 square feet VG -29 The north side of Kenyon from Milliken to Fairmont. The groundcover on the east side of Fairmont, east of the sidewalk, from Kenyon to the 210 freeway. Ground Cover area: 20,178 square feet Turf area: 16,877 square feet Hardscape area: 5,736 square feet VG -30 The south side of Tresenda from Santo to Sapada. The paseo from Sapada to Carano. The south side of Montella from Carano to Trivento. Ground Cover area: 6,797 square feet Turf area: 2,462 square feet Hardscape area: 4,860 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #05 P937 VG -31 The east side of Brienza from Larina to Letini. The west side of Tindari from Letini to Larina. The Greenbelt on the south side of Marconi from Trivento to Comisco. The east side of Comisco from Scalea to Santo. Ground Cover area: 23,419 square feet Turf area: 18,351 square feet Hardscape area: 13,764 square feet VG -32 The north side of Candela from Terini to Bettoloa. Ground Cover area Turf area: Hardscape area: 20,172 square feet 8,190 square feet 8,292 square feet VG -33 The paseo at the north end of Sapri to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground Cover area: 894 square feet Hardscape area: 318 square feet VG -34 The paseo at the north end of Bronte to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground Cover area: 894 square feet Hardscape area: 318 square feet VG -35 The east side of Rochester from 555 feet south of Palmi to Victoria Park. The south side of Victoria Park and median from Rochester to east side of Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 53,646 square feet Turf area: 11,150 square feet Hardscape area: 17,555 square feet VG -36 The north side of Victoria Park from the east side of Deer Creek Channel to Rochester. Ground Cover area: Turf area: Hardscape area: 55,780 square feet 10,500 square feet 8,004 square feet VG -37 The paseo at the end of Ardmoor to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground Cover area: 1,350 square feet Hardscape area: 950 square feet VG -38 The east side of Milliken from 106 feet north of Victoria Park to Kenyon. The north and south side of Spring Mist from Milliken to Summerstone. The south side of Kenyon from Milliken to Kenyon Park. Ground Cover area: 28,051 square feet Turf area: 4,533 square feet Hardscape area: 12,879 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 16 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #05 P938 VG -39 The north side of Victoria Park from Kenyon paseo to 132 feet east of Milliken. The Kenyon paseo from Victoria Park to Fairwinds. The paseo from Victoria Park to the south west corner of Kenyon Park. Ground Cover area: 55,089 square feet Turf area: 13,120 square feet Hardscape area: 7,676 square feet VG -40 The south side of Highland from 413 feet west of Highland paseo to Highland paseo. The east side of Highland paseo from Highland to Kenyon. The north side of Kenyon from Highland paseo to Autumn Glen. Ground Cover area: 56,553 square feet Hardscape area: 12,314 square feet VG -41 The west side of Rochester from 294 feet south of Highland to Lark. The north side of Lark from Rochester to 1230 feet west of Rochester. Ground Cover area: 31,413 square feet Hardscape area: 13,338 square feet VG -42 The south side of Highland from 1314 feet west of Rochester to Rochester. The west side of Rochester from Highland to 294 feet south of Highland. The north side of Highland from Rochester to Woodruff. Ground Cover area: 40,346 square feet Hardscape area: 15,445 square feet VG -43 The north side of Victoria Park and the median from Day Creek to Day Creek Channel. The east and west side of Kensington from Victoria Park to Stratford. Ground Cover area: 70,669 square feet Turf area: 7,888 square feet Hardscape area: 18,426 square feet VG -44 The west side of Day Creek from 572 feet north of Silverberry to Day Creek. The south side of Silverberry from Kensington to Day Creek. Ground Cover area: 36,835 square feet Hardscape area: 24,376 square feet VG -45 The west side of Milliken and the Milliken median from the 210 freeway to Kenyon. Ground Cover area: 10,658 square feet Turf area: 610 square feet Hardscape area: 5,589 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 17 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #05 P939 VG -46 The Base Line median from 657 feet east of Virginia to Rochester. The north side of Base Line from 278 feet east of Virginia to Rochester. The paseo from the northeast corner of Rochester and Base Line to Huntley. The east side of Rochester from Base Line to 105 feet north of Shenandoah. Ground Cover area: 33,135 square feet Hardscape area: 19,340 square feet VG -47 The north side of Base Line from 400 feet east of Day Creek to Day Creek. Base Line median from Day Creek to 595 feet east of Day Creek. Ground Cover area: 9,515 square feet Hardscape area: 7,926 square feet VG -48 The east side of Day Creek and median from Base Line to Victoria Park. The south side of Victoria Park from Day Creek to 390 feet east of Day Creek. Ground Cover area: 50,318 square feet Turf area: 3,234 square feet Hardscape area: 29,217 square feet VG -49 The north side of Victoria Park and median from 390 feet east of Day Creek to Day Creek. The east side of Day Creek from Victoria Park to Highland. The south side of Highland from Day Creek to 440 feet east of Day Creek. Ground Cover area: 51,459 square feet Turf area: 3,930 square feet Hardscape area: 32,296 square feet VG -50 The west side of San Carmela from 389 feet north of Base Line to Base Line. The north side of Base Line from Carmela to 264 feet west of Durness. Ground Cover area: 18,043 square feet Hardscape area: 12,383 square feet VG -51 The Paseo south of Saxon to Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground Cover area: 1,398 square feet Hardscape area: 969 square feet VG -52 The north side of Sugar Gum from Milliken to Kensington. The south side of Sugar Gum from Milliken to 111 feet east of Suffolk. Ground Cover area: 4,362 square feet Hardscape area: 3,325 square feet VG -53 The south side of Victoria Park from 296 feet west of Kensington to Milliken. The west side of Day Creek from Victoria Park to 397 feet south of Sugar Gum. Ground Cover area: 28,532 square feet Turf area: 11,070 square feet Hardscape area: 7,720 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 18 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #05 P94O VG -54 The east side of Rochester from Shenandoah to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground Cover area: 6,864 square feet Hardscape area: 5,136 square feet VG -55 The paseo north of Westhaven to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground Cover area: 1,775 square feet Hardscape area: 2,575 square feet VG -56 The south side of Highland from 1,317 feet west of Day Creek to 1,085 feet west of Day Creek including the non -irrigated slope on the south side of the sidewalk. Ground Cover area: 5,274 square feet Hardscape area: 1,761 square feet VG -57 The north side of Highland from Fairmont Way to the Day Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 16,157 square feet Hardscape area: 17,405 square feet Ground cover, shrubs and turf areas that make up parkways, median islands and paseos are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company. Parks are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crews. Map of Improvements The following page shows the approximate location (for reference only — may not include all) of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites, and parks and community trails to be maintained by the District. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 19 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #05 B ' 8 a . ILP =R Milliken LN 0 q gggg A jjj N f Q \ W <.���r�� w ,IC) Rochester Av �_�- °_ =•� • i�C o • S 4 w tj N r a Av BI Etiwanda Av M 9 1•� ' i East Av P941 0 �0s— Z Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 20 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #05 • ■ to a m. Z M N CD r � m � J 9 1•� ' i East Av P941 0 �0s— Z Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 20 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #05 P942 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the District levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Operations and Maintenance: Fiscal Year Operations and Maintenance: 2017/18 Budget Expenditures 75,850 Personnel Services: 5,000 Regular Salaries $ 553,780 Overtime Salaries 1,090 Part-time Salaries 90,220 Fringe Benefits 274,010 Subtotal - Personnel 919,100 Operations and Maintenance: Operations and Maintenance: O & MVGeneral 75,850 Vehicle Operations and Maintenance 5,000 Emergency Equipment and Vehicle Rental 200 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 81,050 Contract Services: Contract Services/General 1,317,630 Tree Maintenance 163,340 Subtotal - Contract Services 1,480,970 Utilities: Telephone Utilities 440 Water Utilities 752,410 Electric Utilities 95,590 Subtotal - Utilities 848,440 Assessment Administration 36,060 Adm in./General Overhead 265,170 Interfund Allocation 75,180 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 2,786,870 Capital Expenditures: Captial Outlay - Equipment 17,000 Captial Outlay - Improvements Other Than Building 13,200 Captial Projects 400,000 Subtotal - Capital Expenditures 430,200 Total Expenditures Budget $ 4,136,170 Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 21 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #05 P943 Fiscal Year 2017/18 Budget Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies $ 3,372,930 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 34,730 Subtotal - Taxes 3,407,660 Other Revenues: Interest Earnings 31,760 Park Maintenance Fees 2,000 Subtotal - Other Revenues: 33,760 Transfer In: Transfer In - General Fund 293,490 Total Revenues Budget $ 3,734,910 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ (401,260) Total Gross Estimated Assessments $ 3,405,572.18 Total District EBU Count 76,613.33 Actual Assessment per EBU - Fiscal Year 2017/18 $ 44.47 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU - Fiscal Year 2017/18 $ 44.47 Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per Equivalent Benefit Unit ("EBU") will be based on the total amount of funds needed to maintain the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be the same or lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however, it may not exceed the maximum after the application of the cost of living inflator, as defined in this report, unless the excess increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Operating Reserve Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2017 $3,129,495 Contribution to Reserve - Fiscal Year 2017/18 (401,260) Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2018 $2,728,235 Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 22 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #05 P944 Definitions of Budaet Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements: Personnel Services: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time and part-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Additionally, this includes benefits available to City employees. Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District. Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Utilities: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity, water, and telephone services, as required, for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers in the District. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost of all particular departments and staff of the City, as well as consultants, for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual Engineer's Report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all central services departments of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational District within the City's administrative structure. Capital Outlay: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Other Revenues: This includes other revenues that are not levied through the annual assessments that support the District operations. These other revenues may include: interest earnings, other rental/lease income (cell site tower leases), Park Maintenance Fees, Sports Field User Group Rentals, and parking permits (Metrolink Station paid parking). Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 23 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #05 P945 BENEFITS FROM IMPROVEMENTS AND QUANTIFICATION Benefits from Improvements The improvements previously defined are expected to confer certain special benefits to parcels within the District. The benefits are described below. Sidewalks and Community Trails People walk for a variety of reasons, whether the reason is to commute to work or school, run errands, shop, leisure activities, fitness, or some other purpose. To enhance the overall walking experience, pedestrians seek out and utilize sidewalk facilities and community trails that are in close proximity to their property and provide a safe place to walk as well as an environment that provides a certain amount of visual interest. Sidewalks and community trails serve as a critical component in the transportation network providing users access to parks and recreational areas, schools, commercial areas, and neighbors. According to the U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) sidewalks provide many benefits including safety, mobility and healthier communities (FHWA, n.d). Improved Aesthetics: A survey conducted by DMB (an Arizona based commercial developer) found that there was a strong demand for communities characterized by pedestrian access, a sense of connection, and a sense of community and diversity (Urban Land Institute, 2006). According to the Urban Land Institute report Creating Walkable Places: Compact Mixed -Use Solutions, people want their neighborhoods to provide more opportunities to walk (Urban Land Institute, 2006). A survey sponsored by the Surface Transportation Policy Project found that 55% of respondents would like to walk more, 63% would like to run errands on foot and walk to stores, and 79% would like sidewalks and other places to walk and exercise (Urban Land Institute, 2006). The continued maintenance of the inter -connecting sidewalks and community trails improves the livability and appeal for properties within the District. Increased Safety: According to the FHWA, sidewalks reduce roadway accidents, including pedestrian/motor vehicle accidents. In addition, roadways without sidewalks are more than twice as likely to have pedestrians involved in accidents compared to sites with sidewalks on both sides of the street (FHWA, n.d.). In 2008, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's (NHTSA) National Pedestrian Crash Report identified California as one of the states with the highest number of pedestrian deaths (NHTSA, 2008). Economic Activity: Uniform and well-maintained sidewalk and community trail improvements create cohesion throughout the District. This cohesion enhances both the residential and retail experience as well as encourages maximum use of building and lot area. According to Active Living Research (2010), economic benefits of walkable developments include enhanced marketability and faster sales or leases than conventional development. The National Complete Streets Coalition notes that street design that is inclusive of all modes of transportation, where appropriate, not only improves conditions for and access to existing businesses, but also is a proven method for attracting new development (Pugliese, 2008). Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 24 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #05 P946 Street Landscaping The overall appeal and safety of an area is enhanced when landscaping improvements are in place and kept in a healthy and satisfactory condition. Conversely, appeal and safety decreases when landscaping is overgrown, unsafe or destroyed by the elements or vandalism. Improved Aesthetics: Street landscaping improvements improve the livability, commercial activity, appearance and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District. Regular maintenance ensures that the improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties adjacent to or in close proximity to the improvements within the District. According to the Victoria Transport Policy Institute (2011), streetscapes have a significant effect on how people view and interact with their community. With streetscapes that are safe and inviting, people are more likely to walk, which can help reduce automobile traffic, improve public health, stimulate local economic activity and attract residents to the community. Increased Safety: Safety for pedestrians involves not only a degree of protection from vehicular accidents, but also from criminal activity. Well maintained areas mitigate crime, especially vandalism, and enhance pedestrian safety. A recent study has found that after landscape improvements were installed, there was a 46% decrease in crash rates across urban arterial and highway sites and a second study reviewed found a 5% to 20% reduction in mid -block crashes after trees and planters in urban arterial roads were put in place. In addition, there is less graffiti, vandalism, and littering in outdoor spaces with natural landscapes than in comparable plant -less spaces (Wolf, 2010). The Victoria Transport Policy Institute (2011) has found that streetscapes reduce traffic speeds, and when combined with improved pedestrian crossing conditions, can significantly reduce collisions. Furthermore, maintained sidewalks and trails increase pedestrian safety by reducing the number of trips and falls from those using the improvements. • Economic Activity: Well-maintained street landscape improvements not only make adjacent properties appear more stable and prosperous, but can spur investment in the property. According to the FHWA, landscaped sidewalks create an inviting place for customers to shop and do business (FHWA, 2001). Parks Park facilities enhance the overall quality of an area and are an important component of complete and sustainable neighborhoods. Neighborhood parks offer both active and passive recreational opportunities: a place to play, exercise, spend time with neighbors, or relax. The parks within the District are developed and maintained to appeal to all age groups and interests, and promote a healthy community. Recreation and park facilities have proven to be a potent factor in maintaining a high standard of livability in the community. Improved Aesthetics. The park improvements provide beautification, shade and enhancement to properties, which creates a sense of community for the parcels within the District. The overall appeal and desirability of an area is enhanced when public parks and recreational facilities are in place, improved, operable, safe, clean and maintained. Conversely, appeal and desirability decrease when park and recreational facilities are unsafe or destroyed by the elements or vandalism. According to The Trust for Public Land, Corporate CEOs say that employee quality of life is the third most important factor in locating new businesses (Harnik and Welle, n.d.). Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 25 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #05 P947 Economic Activity: Parks attract both businesses and residents to communities. According to The Trust for Public Land, small company owners say recreation, parks and open spaces in close proximity to properties used for business purposes are the highest priority in choosing a new location for their businesses. As a result of the collective improvements (sidewalks, community trails, street landscaping and parks) being maintained, the overall livability for properties within the District will increase. Livability encompasses several qualities and characteristics that are unique to a specific area. The Victoria Transport Policy Institute (2011) expands on the concept of livability and the various benefits associated with that designation: The livability of an area increases property desirability and business activity. Livability is largely affected by conditions in the public realm, places where people naturally interact with each other and their community, including streets, parks, transportation terminals and other public facilities. Livability also refers to the environmental and social quality of an area as perceived by employees, customers and visitors. This includes local environmental conditions, the quality of social interactions, opportunities for recreation and entertainment, aesthetics, and existence of unique cultural and environmental resources. Quantification of Benefit As a result of the District maintenance and servicing activities, there will be a level of general benefits to people that do not live in or intend to conduct business within the District. In order for property within the District to be assessed only for that portion of special benefits received from the District maintenance and servicing activities, general benefits provided by the ongoing maintenance and servicing of the improvements needs to be quantified. The amount of general benefit that is provided from the District maintenance activities cannot be funded via property owners' assessments. The District currently consists of 5,890 single family residences, 592 condominium units, 589 multi -family (apartment) units, 42.33 acres of commercial property, 4 schools, 1 church, 1 fire station, and 36.99 acres of undeveloped property. Properties are classified by their land use code as shown on San Bernardino County's latest secured roll. Sidewalks and Community Trails The City is comprised of many smaller communities located throughout the City. Most of the communities have parks and schools that are proximate to and serve the residents in their immediate vicinity. There are four schools in addition to the six parks within the District. Two of the four schools have school District boundaries that are only within the Distrct. However, two of the schools include areas outside of the District as part of their school district boundaries. The primary reason persons living outside the District would enter the District would be to access the schools. Therefore, we must consider the school district boundary areas outside of the District when analyzing the pedestrian traffic that may use the sidewalks and community trails within the District. The Summary of Travel Trends, 2009 National Household Travel Survey (NHTS) prepared by the U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration (FHWA, 2011) analyzed the number of person trips by various modes of transportations such as private vehicle, transit, Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 26 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #05 P948 walking or some other means of transportation. According to the Pacific Division data extracted from the 2009 NHTS database, of the annual 181,703 (in millions) total person trips, 21,252 (in millions) or 11.70% of those person trips were made by using walking as their mode of transportation (FHWA, 2011). According to the U.S. Census Bureau (2010), the average household size in the City is 2.98 persons. Based on this average household size, and considering there are 6,957 residential units within the District, there are approximately 20,732 people residing within the District boundaries. There are an estimated 12,000 residential units within the school district boundaries that are not within the boundaries of the District. Based on the City's average household size, there are approximately 35,760 persons residing outside of the District boundaries, but within the school district boundaries. The following shows the estimated number of residential units and persons within the school district boundaries and either within or outside the District boundaries: School District Population Estimated Number of Residential Units Estimated Number of Persons Within District Boundaries 6,957 20,732 Outside District Boundaries 12,000 35,760 Total Population 18,957 56,492 In order to determine the estimated total number of persons who are within close proximity to the sidewalk and trail improvements, and would utilize walking as their mode of transportation, we applied the 11.70% of person trips reported from the NHTS Pacific Division study, to the total number of persons within District and school district boundaries (56,492). There are approximately 6,610 people within proximity of the District that utilize walking as their mode of transportation. Applying the 2009 NHTS walking trip percentage to the District population (20,732), we estimate that of the 6,610 persons who are within close proximity of the District and use walking as their primary mode of transportation, 2,426 people are within the District boundaries. Therefore, the total surrounding neighborhood area population, located outside of the District boundaries, but in close proximity to the sidewalk and trail improvements, who use walking as their primary mode of transportation is estimated to be 4,184 people. In order to obtain a better picture of the overall level of general benefit provided by the sidewalk and community trail improvements, the pedestrian traffic that utilizes walking as the mode of transportation that will seek out and use sidewalks and community trails within the District's boundaries, but live outside of the District, must be considered. The 2009 NHTS further details the purposes of the 21,252 (in millions) reported walking trips. Based on the property types within the District, people utilizing the sidewalks and community trails within the District would most likely do so for the following reasons: walking to school, day care or religious activity, social or recreational activities, and shopping or running errands. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 27 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #05 Estimated Number School District Population of Persons Within District Boundaries 2,426 Outside District Boundaries 4,184 Total Population — uses walking as 6,610 primary mode of transportation In order to obtain a better picture of the overall level of general benefit provided by the sidewalk and community trail improvements, the pedestrian traffic that utilizes walking as the mode of transportation that will seek out and use sidewalks and community trails within the District's boundaries, but live outside of the District, must be considered. The 2009 NHTS further details the purposes of the 21,252 (in millions) reported walking trips. Based on the property types within the District, people utilizing the sidewalks and community trails within the District would most likely do so for the following reasons: walking to school, day care or religious activity, social or recreational activities, and shopping or running errands. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 27 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #05 P949 The following details the number of walking trips, based on the 2009 NHTS study, for each of the activities that are the most likely reasons people outside of the District would use the sidewalk and community trail improvements within the District: Trip Purpose Number of Walking Trips in millions School/Daycare/Religious Activity 872 Shopping/Errands 5,820 Social/Recreational 2,268 Don't know/Other 139 Total 9,099 Of the total number of walking trips reported, 9,099 (in millions) or 42.81% are for purposes that persons outside of the District would utilize the sidewalk and trail improvements within the District. Applying this percentage (42.81%) to the number of people using walking as their mode of transportation and that live outside of the District (4,184), but use the sidewalks and community trails within the District, there are approximately 1,791 people using the maintained sidewalks and community trails for general benefit purposes. The persons engaging in general benefit activities represents 3.17% of the total school district population (56,492), and is therefore considered to be District general benefit. School District boundary General Benefit Given the location and nature of the improvements, it is very unlikely the public at large would seek out or use the sidewalks and trails within the District, but would use those proximate to their own properties. The City has regional trails that connect different areas of the City, and those trails do appeal to and attract other residents of the City as well as residents that live outside the City. Nevertheless, it is likely that certain members of the public at large use the sidewalks or community trails within the District. As such, we have assigned a 1.00% general benefit for the sidewalk and community trails to the public at large. Public at large General Benefit 1 1.00% Based on the above calculations, the general benefit portion of the improved aesthetics, increased safety, and economic activity benefits resulting from the sidewalk and trail improvements is estimated to be 4.17% and the special benefit is estimated to be 95.83%. Sidewalk and Trail General Benefit 1 4.17% Street Landscaping Based upon the City's General Plan (2010) Roadway Hierarchy, the streets within the District are classified into one of the following categories: arterial, collector, or local (minor) streets. The majority of street landscaping is located along roads classified as collector and local streets and primarily situated within the public right-of-ways of the internal local street network. A portion of the maintained landscaping is, however, located along the arterial streets, and, as such, provides some general benefit to pass-through traffic. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 28 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #05 P95O Local Streets For purposes of determining general and special benefits, all streets within the District other than the specific streets listed as collector and arterial streets below are considered local streets. The local streets within the District were intended to serve individual neighborhoods and not to be pass-through streets, but cul-de-sacs or loop roads to reduce through traffic (Victoria Community Plan, 1980). In addition, according to the City's General Plan (2010), the primary intended purpose of local streets is to serve fronting properties. From a visual inspection of the layout of the District one must conclude that the purpose of the local streets is exclusively intended for the benefit of the parcels on such streets. There is no local street that provides a direct or efficient means of traveling from one place to another such that one could reasonably expect a driver to purposefully choose the District's local streets as the best route for travel unless necessary because the route either began or ended with a parcel in the District. A route beginning or ending with a parcel within the District does not include the "general public" for purposes of determining general benefit. However, one can imagine a minimal degree of pass through traffic even on something such as a cul-de-sac. As expressed by the Court in Beutz v. County of Riverside (2010), "... courts of this state have long recognized that virtually all public improvement projects provide general benefits." Given the location to the schools, parks, and shopping in the City, there are bound to be drivers that make use of the local streets for no other reason but to turn around or go back from where they came, especially if they are dropping their children off at one of the schools. Additionally, given the nature of the street landscaping, one could imagine a small degree of "residential tourism" wherein drivers are in fact simply "passing through" to enjoy the beautiful views of the homes, the natural surroundings or visiting friends. A conservative estimate of 1.00% for each scenario would result in the general benefit portion of the improved aesthetics, increase safety, and economic activity benefits resulting from the street landscaping improvements on local streets to be 2.00% and the special benefit is estimated to be 98.00%. Local Street General Benefit 1 2.00% Collector Streets: Victoria Park, Etiwanda, Highland and Church Because of the similarities in use, layout, type, and designation, the benefits of Victoria Park, Etiwanda, Highland and Church are considered to be equal. Etiwanda, Highland and Church border the District and are used as the main access to and from properties within the District. Victoria Park serves as the main access point to each of the four schools and is the connector street running through the District. Victoria Park, Etiwanda, Highland and Church connect the various neighborhoods, schools and parks within the District in addition to providing circulation between the local streets and the arterial network. As such, we must also consider the neighborhoods that surround the District and are within the school district boundaries, but not within the actual District when analyzing vehicle traffic that may use the streets within the District. The City's Traffic Study (2009) does not include the traffic volume and number of daily trips on the connector streets within the District. As such a study is unavailable at this time we have use the NHTS Pacific Division data in order to estimate the number of drivers who use the streets within the District. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 29 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #05 P951 According to the Pacific Division data extracted from the NHTS database, of the annual 181,703 (in millions) total person trips, 152,827 (in millions) or 84.11 % of those trips were made using a personal motor vehicle (FHWA, 2011). According to the 2001 National Household Travel Survey, household file, U.S. Department of Transportation (2001), the mean drivers per household is 1.75. Based on the drivers per household average, and considering the 6,957 households within the District, there are approximately 12,175 drivers within the District. There are an estimated 12,000 residential units within the school district boundaries that are not within the boundaries of the District. Based on the drivers per household average, there are approximately 21,000 additional drivers that reside outside of the District boundaries, but are in close proximity to the District. School District Population Estimated Number of Residential Units Estimated Number of Drivers Within District Boundaries 6,957 12,175 Outside District Boundaries 12,000 21,000 Total 18,957 33,175 Applying the percentage of vehicle trips (84.11 %) reported from the NHTS Pacific Division study to the District and school district boundaries area outside of the District population sets (33,175), approximately 27,903 people are within proximity of the District that utilize a private vehicle as their primary mode of transportation. Applying the 2009 NHTS vehicle trip percentage to the estimated number of drivers within the District (12,175) approximately 10,240 people within the District boundaries use a personal vehicle as their primary mode of transportation. Therefore, the total surrounding neighborhood area population, located outside of the District boundaries, that uses a vehicle as their mode of transportation is estimated to be 17,663 people. In order to obtain a better picture of the overall level of general benefit provided by the improvements, the vehicle traffic that will seek out and use the collector streets to access parcel's within the District, but live outside of the District, must be considered. The 2009 NHTS further details the purposes of the 152,827 (in millions) reported vehicle trips. Based on the property types within the District, people utilizing the collector streets to access properties within the District would most likely do so for the following reasons: attend school, day care or religious activity, social or recreational activities, and to shop or run errands. The following details the number of vehicle trips for each of the activities that are the most likely reasons people outside of the District would use the collector streets to access properties within the District: Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 30 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #05 Estimated Number School District Population of Persons Within District Boundaries 10,240 Outside District Boundaries 17,663 Total Population — uses personal vehicle 27,903 as primary mode of transportation In order to obtain a better picture of the overall level of general benefit provided by the improvements, the vehicle traffic that will seek out and use the collector streets to access parcel's within the District, but live outside of the District, must be considered. The 2009 NHTS further details the purposes of the 152,827 (in millions) reported vehicle trips. Based on the property types within the District, people utilizing the collector streets to access properties within the District would most likely do so for the following reasons: attend school, day care or religious activity, social or recreational activities, and to shop or run errands. The following details the number of vehicle trips for each of the activities that are the most likely reasons people outside of the District would use the collector streets to access properties within the District: Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 30 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #05 P952 Trip Purpose Number of Vehicle Trips in millions School/Daycare/Religious Activity 6,470 Shopping/Errands 30,998 Social/Recreational 16,185 Don't know/Other 688 Total 54,341 Of the total number of vehicle trips reported, 54,341 (in millions) or 35.56% are for purposes that persons outside of the District would most likely utilize the collector streets within the District. Applying this percentage to the number of people using vehicles as their primary mode of transportation and live outside of the District (17,663), but would use Victoria Park, Etiwanda, Highland or Church as a connector to their destination within the District, there are approximately 6,281 people using the maintained streets for general benefit purposes. The persons engaging in general benefit activities represents 18.93% of the total estimated drivers (33,175), and is therefore considered to be District general benefit. As previously mentioned, the local street special benefit has been estimated at 98.00% and, as such, the estimated minimum special benefit of Victoria Park, Etiwanda, Highland and Church should be reduced by 2.00% to account for that portion of traffic using local streets representing general benefit. Based on the above calculations, the general benefit portion of the improved aesthetics, increased safety, and economic activity benefits resulting from the street landscaping improvements on collector streets is estimated to be 20.93% and the special benefit is estimated to be 79.07%. Collector Street General Benefit 1 0.93% Arterial Streets: Milliken, Base Line, Day Creek and Rochester Arterial streets are intended to provide a higher degree of mobility and generally serve longer vehicle trips. The arterial streets with landscape improvements serve not only residents in the immediate vicinity, but persons who live outside of the District and are passing by. The City's Traffic Study (2009) does not identify the percentage of traffic on arterial streets, which is pass- through traffic. Before we determine and allocate the percentage of special and general benefit for the arterial streets, we must first compute the estimated pass-through traffic. In lieu of having a study that identifies the pass-through traffic on the arterial streets, the estimated number of special benefit trips on the collector streets has been used since in order to enter or exit the District, a vehicle must travel on one of the arterial streets listed below. Per the City's General Plan (2010), collector streets have an estimated 5,000 to 20,000 vehicles per day, for an average of 12,500. Taking the 12,500 average daily trips for collector streets, 2,616 trips (20.93%) are for general benefit purposes, and 9,884 trips (79.07%), is deemed to be for special benefit purposes. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 31 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #05 P953 Estimated Number of Trips Collector Street Special Benefit — 79.07% 9,884 Collector Street General Benefit — 20.93%' 2,616 Total 12,500 (1) The 20.93% general benefit percentage already includes the 2.00% general benefit to account for the portion of traffic using for local streets. The City's Traffic Study (2009) does provide an estimated number of daily trips for specific areas within the District. When the City's Traffic Study (2009) did not provide the estimated number of daily trips the average number was derived from the estimates provided in the City's General Plan. Street Name Average Number of Vehicles per Dayl Milliken 30,400 Base Line 19,140 Day Creek 25,000 Rochester 12,500 (1) Average Number of Vehicles per Day is from the City's Traffic Study for Milliken Ave and Base Line, (average based on City's Traffic Study at points of street within the District), and from the City's General Plan for Day Creek Blvd and Rochester Ave. Based on the estimated number of 9,884 trips for special benefit purposes, we then reduce the average number of vehicles for each arterial street, to calculate our estimated pass-through trips. The pass-through trips are vehicles driving along the maintained streets within the District for a portion of their trips, but not residing in the District or benefiting from the landscaping improvements in place. Street Name Average Number of Vehicles per Day Less: Estimated Special Benefit Tris Estimated Number of Pass Through Tris Estimated % General Benefit Milliken 30,400 9,884 20,516 67.49% Base Line 19,140 9,884 9,256 48.36% Day Creek 25,000 9,884 15,116 60.47% Rochester 12,500 9,884 2,616 20.93% Although Rochester is listed as an arterial, the City's General Plan (2010) Roadway Hierarchy includes this street as a Tertiary Travel Corridor, which categorizes the street as more locally oriented and locally travelled. In addition, the Roadway Hierarchy says that the typical number of vehicles per day is between 10,000 and 15,000 (average 12,500). Etiwanda Avenue and Church are also included in the category, and as such, the general benefit trip percentage is close to the same as for the collector streets. As previously mentioned, the estimated minimum special benefit of Milliken, Base Line, Day Creek and Rochester have already been reduced by 2% to account for that portion of traffic using local streets representing general benefit. Street Landscaping General Benefit Percentage The general benefit percentages determined in the previous sections were then applied to each type of road in the District. The area in square feet of landscaping being maintained in the District was determined by the City's Public Works Department. The general benefit percentage Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 32 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #05 P954 for each road and street type was multiplied by the total square footage being maintained for such street. The general benefit square footage was summed for all street segments and divided into the total square footage of all landscaping maintenance. The result is the overall general benefit percentage. The following table details this calculation. Street Name Street Type( 1 Total Square Footage General Benefit Percentage General Benefit Square Footage Milliken Arterial 265,926 67.49% 179,473 Base Line Arterial 367,018 48.36% 177,490 Day Creek Arterial 263,062 60.47% 159,074 Rochester Arterial 175,573 20.93% 36,747 Church Collector 181,344 20.93% 37,955 Etiwanda Collector 10,358 20.93% 2,168 Highland Collector 290,275 20.93% 60,755 Victoria Park Collector 1,348,966 20.93% 282,339 Local/Minor Streets Local/Minor Streets 2,912,709 2.00% 58,254 Totals: 994,255 Street Landscaping General Benefit 1 17.10% Based on the above calculations, the general benefit portion of the improved aesthetics, increased safety, and economic activity benefits resulting from the street landscaping improvements is estimated to be 17.10% and the special benefit is estimated to be 82.90%. Neighborhood Parks The six parks within the District were installed specifically for the residents of the District. Each of the parks is considered to be a neighborhood park, intended to serve those parcels within a one-half mile radius from the park. All parcels within the District are within a one-half mile from one of the six neighborhood parks, and most parcels outside of the District have their own neighborhood parks within close proximity. Even though the park facilities were installed for the benefit of the residents and those working within the District, there will be some general benefit to those people who do not live or conduct business inside the District. There are 43.10 acres of park land within the District. According to the Trip Generation (2003) report, a City park generates an average of 1.59 trips per acre, with a range of rates between 1.04 — 8.00 (arithmetic mean is 4.52). Considering the mean rate per acre (4.52 trips), there are approximately 195 daily trips generated for parks within the District. According to the 2009 NHTS database, the average number of persons per vehicle is estimated to be 1.61 persons. Therefore, based on the 195 daily park trips generated, 314 people are using the parks within the District. There is a standard of one-half mile as a reasonable distance to walk to a park (California DOT, 1979). There are 6,957 households within the District, and an additional 1,834 households that are within a one-half mile and have direct access to the parks, but whose properties are not within the boundaries of the District. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 33 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #05 P955 One -Half Mile Park Population Estimated Number of Residential Units Percentage Within District Boundaries 6,957 79.14% Outside District Boundaries 1,834 20.86% Total Population 8,791 100.00% To allocate the average of park trips generated and people using the parks within the District, we allocate the 314 estimated people using the parks daily by the percentages shown above. Based on the one-half mile radius population, approximately 66 people may use the parks within the District, but living outside of the boundaries of the District. A factor that has been considered is that most of the people living within the one-half mile radius from the parks within the District also live within a closer distance to other parks that are not within the District, and will most likely use the parks that are closer in proximity to their property. However, in calculating the general benefit usage we recognize that those people may still use the District parks. Taking the 66 persons using the parks within the District, but residing outside of the District, divided by the total population residing outside of the District, but within one-half mile from the parks (1,834), the estimated percentage of persons engaging in general benefit park activities that do not reside within the District represents 3.60%. One -Half Mile Boundary General 3.60% Benefit Given the location and size of the parks, it is very unlikely the public at large would seek out or use these smaller, local parks. Especially, when the City has larger community and regional parks that are intended to attract people from outside areas, and provide recreational opportunities beyond those supplied by the neighborhood parks. However, various sports teams are allowed access to the parks for games even though according to the City, sports teams with members residing within the District are given first priority for use of the parks. Nevertheless, it is likely that certain members of the public at large may use the smaller parks, and as such, we have assigned a 1.00% general benefit for the park improvements to the public at large. Public at large General Benefit 1 1.00% Based on the above calculations, the general benefit portion of the improved aesthetics and economic activity benefits resulting from the park improvements is estimated to be 4.60% and the special benefit is estimated to be 95.40%. Park General Benefit 1 4.60% Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 34 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #05 Estimated Number of One -Half Mile People Using Park Population Parks Dail Within District Boundaries 248 Outside District Boundaries 66 Total Population 314 A factor that has been considered is that most of the people living within the one-half mile radius from the parks within the District also live within a closer distance to other parks that are not within the District, and will most likely use the parks that are closer in proximity to their property. However, in calculating the general benefit usage we recognize that those people may still use the District parks. Taking the 66 persons using the parks within the District, but residing outside of the District, divided by the total population residing outside of the District, but within one-half mile from the parks (1,834), the estimated percentage of persons engaging in general benefit park activities that do not reside within the District represents 3.60%. One -Half Mile Boundary General 3.60% Benefit Given the location and size of the parks, it is very unlikely the public at large would seek out or use these smaller, local parks. Especially, when the City has larger community and regional parks that are intended to attract people from outside areas, and provide recreational opportunities beyond those supplied by the neighborhood parks. However, various sports teams are allowed access to the parks for games even though according to the City, sports teams with members residing within the District are given first priority for use of the parks. Nevertheless, it is likely that certain members of the public at large may use the smaller parks, and as such, we have assigned a 1.00% general benefit for the park improvements to the public at large. Public at large General Benefit 1 1.00% Based on the above calculations, the general benefit portion of the improved aesthetics and economic activity benefits resulting from the park improvements is estimated to be 4.60% and the special benefit is estimated to be 95.40%. Park General Benefit 1 4.60% Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 34 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #05 P956 Collective General Benefit Since the District is comprised of improved aesthetics, increased safety and economic activity benefits resulting from a blend of improvements (sidewalks, trails, street landscaping and parks), the activity of both pedestrians and vehicles must be addressed in a collective form rather than independently. Therefore, the arithmetic mean of the general benefit percentages has been used to quantify the overall level of general benefit for the District. This general benefit result is provided in the table below: Sidewalk and Trail General Benefit 4.17% Street Landscaping General Benefit 17.10% Park General Benefit 4.60% District General Benefit 8.62% The general benefit, which is the percentage of the total budget that must be funded through sources other than assessments, is 8.62%. The special benefit then, which is the percentage of the budget that may be funded by assessments, is 91.38%. METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Overview Pursuant to the 1972 Act, Article XIII D of the California Constitution, and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act, all parcels that receive a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, permits the establishment of assessment districts by local agencies for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 commencing with Section 5000) hof the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 35 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #05 P957 Section 22547 of the 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement". Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Examples of parcels exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and right-of- ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. Furthermore, Proposition 218 requires the City to separate general benefits from special benefits, whereas only special benefits may be assessed. As further detailed in the following sections, the Method of Assessment uses the following components to assign special benefit to each parcel: Benefit Points: Assignment of points for aesthetic, safety and economic special benefits. Benefit Factor: Multiplier. For residential parcels the benefit factor is units, and for non- residential parcels the benefit factor is lot size (acreage). Benefit Units: Sum of a parcel's benefit points multiplied by the parcel's benefit factor. The total amount is the special benefit units assigned to a parcel. Apportioning of Special Benefit As previously outlined, each of the parcels within the District receives a special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services provided is identified and the proportionate special benefits derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. The total costs of maintenance and operation, less the amount of general benefits identified, will be assessed to the parcels within the District based on the estimated benefit units assigned to each parcel. To assess special benefits appropriately, it is necessary to relate parcels of different land uses and development status to each other. The benefit unit method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment since there is a total of 5,843 single family parcels within the District which represents 90.96% of the total assessable parcels within the District. The following shows how each parcel's benefit units have been determined. Aesthetic Benefit Points Aesthetic Benefit Points are assigned based upon the property's proximity to the improvements as well as the property's existing land use. All Single Family Residential parcels are located within the same proximity to the collective improvements (sidewalks, community trails, street landscaping and one-half mile from one of the parks). Each Single Family Residential parcel is fronted by sidewalk improvements, is within a one-half mile from one of the neighborhood parks, and uses the roads with street landscaping to enter and exit the District. In addition, the Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 36 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #05 P958 community trails are located throughout the District and serve as connectors between the different neighborhoods, school and shopping locations. All properties are within similar proximity to the trail improvements. Many trails are located along the sidewalks and streets, and all properties within the District have access to the trails through the various access points located throughout the entire District. The Single Family Residential parcels within the District are relatively similar in both building size and lot size. Since the improvements are provided uniformly throughout the District, Single Family Residential parcels are assigned 4.00 aesthetic benefit points, one for each of the improvement types. Multi -Family and Condominium parcels are within close proximity to the sidewalks, and receive the benefit of having maintained sidewalks for users to travel and access the property. Although these parcels benefit from the aesthetics of the sidewalks they do not receive the same benefit as Single Family Residential parcels, since Multi -Family and Condominium parcels do not have continuous sidewalk improvements along the frontage of each parcel/unit. Multi -Family and Condominium parcels are within a one-half mile of the neighborhood parks, use the roads with street landscaping to enter and exit their housing complexes within the District, and are in close proximity to the trail improvements. Accounting for the lower average household size of Multi - Family and Condominium parcels, and not having continuous sidewalk improvements directly fronting their property/unit, these properties have a reduced level of benefit from the improvements. Multi -Family and Condominium parcels are assigned 2.80 benefit points. Maintained sidewalks and street landscaping create an aesthetically pleasing environment for both employees and patrons of commercial properties. The overall aesthetics, interest and desirability of commercial properties within the District increase, as a result of the maintenance and servicing of the collective improvements. Based on the City's Land Use Plan and residential designations of homes within the District, there is an average of six Single Family Residential properties per acre within the District (General Plan, 2010). However, given the nature of their property use type, Commercial properties do not receive the same level of benefit from the trail and park improvements in relationship to residential land uses. Commercial properties are assigned 16.00 benefit points. A handful of parcels within the District are used to provide public services (such as fire stations, schools, churches and other similar uses) to the surrounding community, and are located based upon their proximity to the parcels they serve. These parcels benefit from the collective improvements in place, but at a reduced level compared to a Single Family Residential parcel, due to the nature of the improvements and their land use. In addition, these public service parcels are in place for the surrounding community, and the existence of well-maintained parks, street landscaping and community trails is not a significant factor in the decision to locate those facilities. Given the nature of their property use types, these public service parcels are assigned a 1.00 benefit points in recognition of the limited benefit they receive from the improvements maintained by the District. Undeveloped parcels within the District receive an aesthetic benefit from the maintenance of the collective improvements, but given the very limited activity and pedestrian access that these properties provide, properties within this land use category receive a reduced level of benefit. To account for this reduced benefit, all undeveloped properties are assigned 0.40 benefit points. Common area, roads and easements are deemed to receive no benefit from the District maintenance activities because they serve as connectors for other properties and do not receive benefit from the increased aesthetics. Utility parcels are located based on their proximity to the Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 37 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #05 P959 parcels they serve, and based upon their property usage (wireless towers, flood control basins and fire trail/access roads) do not benefit from the increased aesthetics. The following shows the aesthetic benefit points assigned to the parcel land use categories within the District: Parcel Land Use Category Aesthetic Benefit Points Single Family Residential 4.00 Condominium Residential 2.80 Multi -Family Residential 2.80 Commercial/Industrial 16.00 Public Service Parcels — Church/Fire Station/School 1.00 Undeveloped 0.40 Common Area/Roads/Easements/Utility 0.00 Safety Benefit Points Safety Benefit Points are assigned based upon the property's proximity to the improvements as well as the property's existing land use. The Single Family Residential parcels within the District are relatively similar in both building size and lot size. Since the sidewalks, trails and street landscaping improvements are provided uniformly throughout the District, Single Family Residential parcels are assigned 3.00 safety benefit points, one for each of the improvement types. Based on the additional pedestrian traffic that commercial property generates compared to residential property, and that there is an average of six Single Family Residential Properties per acre within the District, Commercial parcels are assigned 18.00 benefit points. Multi -Family and Condominium parcels are within close proximity to the sidewalks, and receive the benefit of having maintained sidewalks, trails and street landscaping for users to travel and access the property. Multi -Family and Condominium parcels receive a reduced level of benefit from the safety of the sidewalks as they do not receive the same benefit as parcels that have continuous sidewalk improvements along the entire frontage of their parcel/unit. In addition, Multi -Family and Condominium parcels have a lower average household size, which results in a reduced volume of pedestrian traffic on the sidewalks and trails compared to a Single Family Residential parcel. Multi -Family and Condominium parcels are assigned 2.10 benefit points. A handful of parcels within the District are used to provide public services (such as fire stations, schools, churches and other similar uses) to the surrounding community, and are located based upon their proximity to the parcels they serve. However, based on the nature and location of the sidewalk and street landscaping improvements and public access to these properties, these parcels receive a safety benefit from the maintenance of the improvements. These public service parcels are assigned 2.00 benefit points in recognition of the benefit they receive. Well maintained green areas reduce the occurrence of crime and vandalism, and as such the maintenance of the improvements within the District create a safety benefit for the undeveloped parcels within the District. However, the safety benefit is reduced compared to a Single Family Residential parcels due to the very limited activity and pedestrian access that these properties provide. Undeveloped properties are assigned 0.30 benefit points. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 38 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #05 P960 Common area, roads and easements are deemed to receive no benefit from the District maintenance activities because they serve as connectors for other properties and do not receive benefit from the increased aesthetics. Utility parcels are located based on their proximity to the parcels they serve, and given the nature of the property usage ((wireless towers, flood control basins and fire trail/access roads) do not benefit from the increased safety. The following shows the safety benefit points assigned to the parcel land use categories within the District: Parcel Land Use Category Safety Benefit Points Single Family Residential 3.00 Condominium Residential 2.10 Multi -Family Residential 2.10 Commercial/Industrial 18.00 Public Service Parcels — Church/Fire Station/School 2.00 Undeveloped 0.30 Common Area/Roads/Easements/Utility 0.00 Economic Benefit Points Accounting for the existing economic activity throughout the District, as well as the potential for properties to develop, redevelop and invest in their economic presence, properties within the District are assigned benefit points for the economic activity benefits received from the uniform and maintained improvements. Economic activity benefit points are assigned based upon the property's location to the District activities, as well as the property's existing land use. The District's improvements will allow properties to maximize their development, land use and occupancy rates. Residential land uses are assigned benefit points in proportion to the number of trips generated and average number of occupants per dwelling unit in comparison to the typical single family parcel. Single Family Residential parcels are assigned 4.00 benefit points, one for each of the improvement types. Studies have consistently shown that the average multi -family residential unit impacts infrastructure approximately 80% as much as a single family residence. Condominium parcels are assigned 3.20 benefit points since the number of trips generated per condominium unit is approximately 80% of the typical single family residential units (Trip Generation, 2003). Multi -family residential parcels are assigned 2.40 benefit points per dwelling unit since the number of trips generated per multi -family residential unit, per the City's Traffic Study (2009), are 60% of the typical single family residential unit. To recognize the increase in economic activity and additional pedestrian traffic that non- residential properties generate compared to residential property, non-residential Commercial properties are assigned benefit points based on the average trip generations of non-residential property compared to a Single Family Residential property. Based on the City's Traffic Study (2009), and given that the non-residential parcels within the District are of mixed uses, the trip generation rate for non-residential parcels averages just under 320 trips per acre, which is approximately 5.6 times per acre that of a single family residential development. The trip generation rate is reduced to account for pass-through trips which are estimated to be 20%. Therefore, the economic benefit points assigned Commercial parcels is 4.50 per one residential benefit point. Commercial properties are assigned a total of 18.00 economic benefit points. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 39 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #05 P961 The public services parcels and utility parcels within the District are used to provide services to the surrounding community, and are located based upon their proximity to the parcels they serve. These parcels receive no economic benefit from the collective improvements in place. Therefore, they are not assigned benefit points for economic activities. The availability of well-maintained sidewalk, landscaping and park improvements within the local community enhances the ability of owners of undeveloped parcels of land to develop those parcels, as studies have shown that there is an increase in demand for residents and businesses to locate within communities with well-maintained sidewalk, landscaping and park improvements. However, since undeveloped parcels generate fewer trips and given the limited activity these properties provide, they receive a reduced economic benefit from the maintenance of the collective improvements. To account for this reduced benefit, but still recognize development potential, all undeveloped properties are assigned 1.50 benefit points. Common areas and roads are deemed to receive no benefit from the District maintenance activities because they serve as connectors for other properties and do not receive an economic benefit. The following shows the economic benefit points assigned to the parcel land use categories within the District: Parcel Land Use Category Economic Benefit Points Single Family Residential 4.00 Condominium Residential 3.20 Multi -Family Residential 2.80 Commercial/Industrial 18.00 Public Service Parcels — Church/Fire Station/School 0.00 Undeveloped 1.50 Common Area/Roads/Utility 0.00 Total Special Benefit Points Calculation The formula below shows the total special benefit points calculation for each parcel within the District: Parcel's Total Parcel's Parcel's Parcel's Special Benefit = Aesthetic + Safety + Economic Points Benefit Points Benefit Points Benefit Points Parcel Factors The method of apportioning the benefit to the parcels within the District reflects the proportional special benefit assigned to each property within the District based upon various property characteristics of parcels as compared to other properties within the District. By adjusting the assigned special benefit points set forth above by parcel factors, a more complete picture of the proportional special benefits received by each parcel within the District is presented. Given that the special benefits provided by the District focus on aesthetic benefit, safety benefit, and economic activity benefits, it was determined that lot size (acreage) for non-residential parcels and units for residential parcels were the most appropriate parcel factors. The number of units Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 40 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #05 P962 for non-residential parcels would not accurately reflect the amount of development and redevelopment that may occur. In addition, a larger parcel allows for a greater area to develop and redevelop than smaller parcels, which corresponds to larger parcels receiving proportionately greater aesthetic, safety and economic activity benefits when compared to smaller parcels within the District. Therefore, the benefits assigned for each parcel in the District is in direct proportion to the size of the parcel and potential development of the parcel. Residential parcels are limited by the number of units on the parcel more than the actual lot size. However, the greater the lot size, the more units can be placed on a parcel, and the more persons who use and benefits from the collective improvements. Therefore the benefits assigned for each parcel in the District is in direct proportion to the units assigned to that parcel. The formula below shows the parcel factor calculation for each parcel within the District: Residential Parcel Factor = Units Non -Residential Parcel Factor = Acreage Total Benefit Units per Parcel Calculation To appropriately quantify and assign the total benefit units for each parcel within the District, the total special benefit points are further adjusted according to the formula below: Parcel's Total Parcel's Total Parcel Benefit Units = Special Benefit X Factor Points Total Special Benefit Units The total special benefit units for the District at this time are 76,613.33 Data Considerations and Parcel Changes The use of the latest Assessor's Secured Roll information has been and shall be used in the future as the basis in determining each parcel's land use category, units and lot size (acreage), unless better data was or is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number, the land use category, units and lot size (acreage) of the subsequent valid parcels shall serve as the basis in assigning parcel factor special benefit units. If a single parcel changes to multiple parcels, the special benefit units shall be recalculated based on the property type, number of units and acreage data for the new parcels, rather than each new parcel receiving a proportionate share of the original assessment. Special Considerations: Publicly Owned Parcels Any publicly owned parcels that benefit from the improvements cannot be exempt from the assessment. The special benefits accruing to these types of parcels must be determined using the same kind of formulas and benefit point assignment as applied to privately owned parcels. This requirement is clearly conveyed in Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution which states in part, "... Parcels within a district that are owned or used by any agency, the State of California or the United States shall not be exempt from assessment unless the agency can demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that those publicly owned parcels in fact receive Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 41 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #05 P963 no special benefit." Publically owned parcels are categorized and assigned benefit units using the same methodology as privately owned parcels, based on their land use as shown on the latest County Secured Roll. Rate per Benefit Unit The assessment rate per special benefit unit is calculated by dividing the total cost estimate to be assessed by the total special benefit units assigned to the parcels in the District. The following formula provides the assessment rate per special benefit unit calculation: Rate per _ Total Costs to / District's Total Benefit Unit be Assessed Benefit Units Method of Assessment Spread The method of assessment is based upon a formula that assigns the special benefits to each parcel, with special benefit points being adjusted by the parcel's number of units or lot size (acreage). The formula below provides a summary of the annual assessment calculation for each parcel in the District. (A)(B) Parcel's Total = Parcel's Total X Benefit Units Special Benefit Points (B) Parcel's Parcel's Parcel's Total = Aesthetic + Safety Special Benefit Benefit Points Benefit Points Points (C) Residential Parcel Factor = Parcel Factor Non -Residential Parcel Factor = Awlyin_g the Method of Assessment Spread (C) Parcel Factor Parcel's + Economic Benefit Points Units Acreage The maximum assessment for each parcel in the District is calculated by the following procedure: Step 1: Assign each parcel its appropriate land use category based on the most recent San Bernardino County Assessor's Secured Roll data. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 42 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #05 P964 Step 2: Determine each parcel's appropriate aesthetic benefit points based on land use. The Step 3: Step 4: aesthetic benefit points are shown in the following table: Parcel Land Use Category Aesthetic Benefit Points Single Family Residential 4.00 Condominium Residential 2.80 Multi -Family Residential 2.80 Commercial/Industrial 16.00 Public Service Parcels — Church/Fire Station/School 1.00 Undeveloped 11 Common Area/Roads/Easements/Utility 0.00 Determine each parcel's appropriate safety benefit points based on land use. The safety benefit points are shown in the following table: Parcel Land Use Category Safety Benefit Points Single Family Residential 3.00 Condominium Residential 2.10 Multi -Family Residential 2.10 Commercial/Industrial 18.00 Public Service Parcels — Church/Fire Station/School 2.00 Undeveloped 0.30 Common Area/Roads/Easements/Utility 0.00 Determine each parcel's appropriate economic benefit points based on land use. The economic benefit points are shown in the following table: Parcel Land Use Category Economic Benefit Points Single Family Residential 4.00 Condominium Residential 3.20 Multi -Family Residential 2.80 Commercial/Industrial 18.00 Public Service Parcels — Church/Fire Station/School 0.00 Undeveloped 1.50 Common Area/Roads/Utility 0.00 Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 43 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #05 P965 Step 5: Sum the aesthetic benefit points, safety benefit points and economic benefit points for each parcel. The total benefit points are shown in the following table: Parcel Land Use Category Aesthetic Benefit Points Safety Benefit Points Economic Benefit Points Total Benefit Points Single Family Residential 4.00 3.00 4.00 11.00 Condominium Residential 2.80 2.10 3.20 8.10 Multi -Family Residential 2.80 2.10 2.80 7.70 Commercial/Industrial 16.00 18.00 18.00 52.00 Public Service Parcels — Church/ Fire Station/ School 1.00 2.00 0.00 3.00 Undeveloped 0.40 0.30 1.50 2.20 Common Area/ Roads/ Easements/ Utility 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Step 6: Determine the appropriate parcel factor based on the parcel's land use. The unit of measurement for each parcel factor, by land use, is shown in the following table: Residential Parcel Factor = Units Non -Residential Parcel = Acreage Factor Step 7: Multiply the total benefit points by parcel factor to compute each parcel's total special benefit units. Step 8: Sum the result of Step 7 for all parcels in the District. Step 9: Separate the general benefit from the special benefit, and divide the portion of the budget representing special benefit by the result of Step 8 to compute the rate per benefit unit. Step 10: Multiply each parcel's total benefit units by the result of Step 9 to compute each parcel's assessment. Step 11: In future years the rate per benefit unit maybe adjusted by inflation. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 44 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #05 P966 Proposed Maximum Assessment Rates The Fiscal Year 2017/18 maximum allowable assessment rate is calculated by dividing the net total to be assessed by the total special benefit units assigned to parcels in the District based on property type, unit and acreage data. For Fiscal Year 2017/18, the calculation is as follows: Maximum Assessment _ Special Benefit / District's Total per Benefit Unit to be Assessed Benefit Units $44.47 = $3,405,572.18 / 76,613.33 Parcel Land Use Category Total Benefit Points Parcel Factor Maximum Allowable Assessment for 2017/18 Single Family Residential 11.00 Parcel $489.17 Condominium Residential 8.00 Unit 360.21 Multi -Family Residential 7.70 Unit 342.42 Commercial/Industrial 52.00 Acre 2,312.44 Public Service Parcels - Church/ Fire Station/ School 3.00 Acre 133.41 Undeveloped 2.20 Acre 97.83 Common Area/ Roads / Easements/ Utility 0.00 Parcel 0.00 Cost of Living Inflator Each fiscal year, beginning Fiscal Year 2014/15, the maximum allowable assessment amount may be increased by the lesser of 3% or the percentage change in the year ending February preceding the start of the Fiscal Year of the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (CPI -U), for the Los Angeles -Riverside -Orange County area. If for any reason the percentage change is negative, the maximum allowable assessment would not be decreased by reason of such negative percentage change and would remain at the amount as computed on the previous fiscal year regardless of any CPI -U adjustment. If operating costs are such that the maximum assessment amount is not needed, the City would levy only what is needed for that fiscal year. The actual assessment rate for Fiscal Year 2017/18 will increase from $476.19 to $489.17 per single-family residence, a rate increase of 2.71% as compared to Fiscal Year 2016/17. The proposed Fiscal Year 2017/18 rates are equal to or less than the maximum allowable assessment amount authorized by Proposition 218. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 45 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #05 P967 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the San Bernardino County Assessor Office, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 46 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #05 P968 �a4 gal: 2g x M Q 4 p 44A t C. CU W ;U da�ag�D o a .'�'• e7 a CO O S "— "� m 0Ila•• �a&v� Grove AV t..i.._..� ;U 00r.._. pox. 4 ...L a =Carnelian St Vineyard AV =rm Hellman Av�»,�� - a Hellman AV Archibald Av - Archibald AV _ i Hermosa AV a Hermosa AV i Haven AV - Haven AV i i I Milliken AV Milliken AV --- ty Rochester AV 1 Z; Rochester AV y ...........ffidi..w.._. n Da Creek BI 4) (D O Etiwanda AV I Etiwanda AV � 1 � �2 East AV - > -n W �. o Z' r O a in r Cher AV Q r n C� 0 CL `� D 16 Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 47 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #05 P969 ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2017/18 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2017/18 actual assessments for the District: Property Type (County Use Code) Actual Assessment Rate Per EBU Total Units/ Acres Total EBUs Total Assessment Single Family Residential $44.47 5,890.00 64,790.00 $2,880,740.10 Condominium Residential 44.47 592.00 4,795.20 213,084.48 Multi-Fam ily Residential 44.47 589.00 4,535.30 201,701.79 Commercial/ Industrial 44.47 42.33 2,200.90 97,870.92 Public Service Parcels — Church/Fire Station/ School 44.47 70.27 210.82 9,365.22 Undeveloped 44.47 36.99 81.11 2,809.67 Common Area, Roads, Easements, Utility Parcels - - - Total 1 7,220.59 76,613.331 $3,405,572.18 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations The following annexations are effective for Fiscal Year 2017/18: APN Annexation Date Project Name Total Units/Acres Total EBUS Pro ertT e 1089-011-04 03/16/2016 TR18508 31.00 31.00 Single Family Residential Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 48 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #05 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2017/18 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A (Hyssop) P970 A.Hachwir- 4-00 P971 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3A (HYSSOP) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2700 Fax: 909.477.2849 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Lynne B. Kennedy, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Sam Spagnolo, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Process for Annual Assessment PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS Description of the Boundaries of the District Description of Improvements and Services Map of Improvements ESTIMATE OF COSTS District Budget Definitions of Budget Items METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Overview General Benefit Special Benefit Method of Assessment Spread ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS Assessment Roll 1 3 3 3 4 4 4 5 7 7 8 9 9 10 10 14 14 P972 P973 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on June 21, 2017, the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 17-045, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A (Hyssop) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed staff to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2017/18 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. Fiscal Year 2017/18 Budget Expenditures Operations and Maintenance $ 8,570 Total Expenditures Budget 8,570 Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments Other Revenues Total Revenues Budget Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance Total District EBU Count Actual Assessment per EBU Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU 3,730 440 4,170 $ (4,400) 9.00 $ 413.74 $ 413.74 Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A — City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #06 P974 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. 2. 1 have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, I certify that the Annual Engineer's Report and Assessment Diagram included herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A — City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #06 P975 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement or facility such as paseos, community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, and providing for the growth, vigor and care of the trees and landscape plant materials. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting of landscape or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the District for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the District by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the District. • Refers to the Engineer's Report, on file with the City Clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the City Clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A — City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #06 P976 hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including the improvements, to the zones within the District, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. PLANS AND SPECIFI CA TIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area of the City South and East of Hyssop south of 6th Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements maintained by the District include the trees, landscaped sites and appurtenant facilities that are throughout the District. These improvements are located within the street right-of-ways and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, the pruning, fertilizing, mowing, weeding, pest control, removal of trash/debris, and irrigation of the trees, shrubs, vines, ground cover, and turf. Maintenance of associated improvements and facilities, such as community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, includes but is not limited to, grading and replacement of trail surfacing, trail fence repair and replacement, steel fence painting, repair and replacement, and irrigation systems control, adjustment, trouble -shooting, repair and replacement. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, capital projects and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A — City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #06 P977 replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Site # Descriptive Location J-1 The west side of Hyssop from south of 6th to the south end of the cul-de-sac. Ground Cover area: 6,050 square feet Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A — City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #06 P978 i,•Ts�9 MillikenAv 1 1 Jj �[gSST�I� 1 1 1 r Charles Smith Av � t n I 3 I 0� w � o i~' �► w n 1 I 1 10 r I tr r w r.. D in � •._._�_._._._._.���.vYi[LLAT_.__._._._._._._._._._._._.t _� i Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A — City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #06 P979 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the District levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Expenditures Operations and Maintenance: Operations and Maintenance: O & M/General Contract Services: Contract Services/General Utilities: Water Utilities Electric Utilities Subtotal - Utilities Assessment Administration Admin./General Overhead Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance Fiscal Year 2017/18 Budget $ 500 4,780 1,000 940 1,940 50 1,300 8,570 Total Expenditures Budget 8,570 Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments 3,730 Other Revenues: Interest Earnings 440 Total Revenues Budget Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance Total Gross Estimated Assessments Total District EBU Count $ 4,170 $ (4,400) Actual Assessment per EBU - Fiscal Year 2017/18 $ Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU - Fiscal Year 2017/18 $ 3,723.66 9.00 413.74 413.74 The maximum allowable assessment per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in Fiscal Year 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the estimated costs of Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A — City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #06 P980 maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however, it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Operating Reserve Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2017 $ 36,946 Contribution to Reserve - Fiscal Year 2017/18 4,400 Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2018 $ 32,546 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time and part-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Additionally, this includes benefits available to City employees. Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District. Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Utilities: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity, water, and telephone services, as required, for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers in the District. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost of all particular departments and staff of the City, as well as consultants, for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual Engineer's Report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all central services departments of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A — City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #06 P981 administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational District within the City's administrative structure. Capital Outlay: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Other Revenues: This includes other revenues that are not levied through the annual assessments that support the District operations. These other revenues may include: interest earnings, other rental/lease income (cell site tower leases), Park Maintenance Fees, Sports Field User Group Rentals, and parking permits (Metrolink Station paid parking). METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Overview Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 commencing with Section 5000) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]. Section 22547 of the 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement". Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights -of -ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A — City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #06 P982 The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. General Benefit Section 4 of Article XIII D of the California Constitution provides that once a local agency which proposes to impose assessments on property has identified those parcels that will have special benefits conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed, the local agency must next "separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred," and only the special benefits can be included in the amount of the assessments imposed. In this District, the improvements being financed consists of the maintenance of local improvements located within the boundaries of the District and include paseos, street trees, landscaped areas and appurtenant facilities that are located throughout the District and were installed to create a common landscape theme and neighborhood identity for parcels within the District. The improvements are situated within the public rights-of-way of the internal local street network within the District which provides ingress and egress for parcels within the District to access the City's system of arterial streets. City residents and traffic from parcels not within the District do not use the internal local street network or paseos except for the express purpose of accessing properties located within the District, and therefore do not benefit from the improvements. Only parcels which are within the District and proximate to the improvements and within the District are being assessed. Accordingly, there is a direct physical and visual nexus between each parcel being assessed and the improvements to be funded by the assessment that does not exist for parcels outside of the District boundary and that is particular and distinct from that shared by the public at large. Under these circumstances, all of the benefits conferred are direct and local in nature, and provide a benefit to only those parcels located within the boundaries of the District. Based upon this, it has been determined that there is no quantifiable general benefit to the surrounding community and the public in general from the maintenance of the improvements within the boundaries of the District, and therefore no portion of the project costs should be attributed to general benefit. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District and, as such, confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A — City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #06 P983 share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District, only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements is identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined; however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since Fiscal Year 1996/97. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The EBU method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one EBU. Every other land -use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land -use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land -use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land -Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Property Type (County Use Code) EBU Value Multiplier Non -Residential 1.00 Parcel The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A — City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #06 P984 The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2017/18 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the San Bernardino County Assessor Office, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A — City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #06 Maximum Allowable Actual Assessment Asessment Rate Total Property Type County Use Code Rate per EBU per EBU Units/Acres Total EBUs Non -Residential $413.74 $413.74 9.00 9.00 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the San Bernardino County Assessor Office, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A — City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #06 P985 �33fila6Sgd�s° ((D 1'a�#65a•3 D o m U) a e��+Q��. 9 t k 1 Grove AVHi ,_.._..---•—••��t— _..� 9 e311�a49$i¢d Carnelian St Vineyard AV i Hellman AV Hellman AV Archibald AV i Archibald AV Hermosa AV j Hermosa AV Haven Av! Haven AV i Milliken AV Milliken AV Rochester AV j j Rochester AV � L ............ _.._._. y Day Creek 1311 Ilaj Etiwanda AV L Etiwanda AV i A, i � � � S2 East AV �_•_•,—•.—,� i ••`.mss® i �. D 1 W CD CA C o 46 r— a CD WL �• Cherry AV i - C) = CL 0 D Oak D .�,. N Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A — City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #06 P986 ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2017/18 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2017/18 actual assessment for the District: A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations There were no annexations for the Fiscal Year 2017/18. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A — City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #06 Actual Assessment Total Property Type (County Use Code) Rate per EBU Units/Acres Total EBUs Total Assessment Non -Residential $413.74 9.00 9.00 $3,723.66 Totals 9.001 9.00 $3,723.66 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations There were no annexations for the Fiscal Year 2017/18. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A — City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #06 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2017/18 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B (Commercial Industrial) P987 macbtrekr - -# 0-7 P988 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B (COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2700 Fax: 909.477.2849 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Lynne B. Kennedy, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Sam Spagnolo, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director P989 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER 1 INTRODUCTION 3 Reason for Assessment 3 Process for Annual Assessment 3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 4 Description of the Boundaries of the District 4 Description of Improvements and Services 4 Map of Improvements 8 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 10 District Budget 10 Definitions of Budget Items 12 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 13 Overview 13 General Benefit 13 Special Benefit 14 Method of Assessment Spread 14 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM 16 ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS 18 Assessment Roll 18 Annexations 18 P990 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on June 21, 2017, the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 17-045, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 313 (Commercial Industrial) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed staff to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2017/18 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. Fiscal Year 2017/18 Budget Expenditures Personnel Services $ 136,430 Operations and Maintenance 910,490 Total Expenditures Budget 1,046,920 Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies 813,720 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 10,700 Subtotal - Taxes 824,420 Other Revenues 258,130 Total Revenues Budget 1,082,550 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ 35,630 Total District EBU Count 2,912.20 Actual Assessment per EBU $ 282.24 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU $ 352.80 Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B — City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #07 P991 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. 2. 1 have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, I certify that the Annual Engineer's Report and Assessment Diagram included herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B — City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #07 P992 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement or facility such as paseos, community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, and providing for the growth, vigor and care of the trees and landscape plant materials. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting of landscape or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the District for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the District by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the District. • Refers to the Engineer's Report, on file with the City Clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the City Clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B — City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #07 P993 hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including the improvements, to the zones within the District, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as the commercial and industrial area of the City which is generally bounded by Foothill on the north, 4th on the South, East on the east and Grove on the west. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services These improvements are located within the street right-of-ways, Metrolink, and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, the pruning, fertilizing, mowing, weeding, pest control, removal of trash/debris, and irrigation of the trees, shrubs, vines, ground cover, and turf. Maintenance of associated improvements and facilities, such as community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, includes but is not limited to, grading and replacement of trail surfacing, trail fence repair and replacement, steel fence painting, repair and replacement, and irrigation systems control, adjustment, trouble -shooting, repair and replacement. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, capital projects and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B — City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #07 P994 low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Site # Descriptive Location J-2 The monument at the northeast corner of Haven and 4th. Ground Cover area: 5,715 square feet Hardscape area: 6,068 square feet J-3 The 6th median from Milliken to Pittsburg. Ground Cover area: 3,300 square feet J-4 The entry monuments on the east and west side of 4th and Milliken. The Milliken median from 411 St to 6'h St. Ground Cover area: 30,594 square feet Hardscape area: 1,748 square feet J-5 The Milliken median from Arrow to Jersey. Ground Cover area: 10,220 square feet J-6 The Spruce median from Foothill to White Oak. Ground Cover area: 4,300 square feet J-7 The 6th median from Pittsburg to Richmond. Ground Cover area: 5,114 square feet J-8 The 6th from Richmond to Buffalo. Ground Cover area: 2,476 square feet J-9 The Milliken railroad underpass. Ground Cover area: 165,633 square feet, Turf area: 4,897 square feet J-10 The 6th median from Cleveland to 1,820 feet east of Cleveland. Ground Cover area: 13,310 square feet J-11 The 6th median from Buffalo to Rochester. Ground Cover area: 12,400 square feet J-12 The Milliken median from Arrow to Century. Ground Cover area: 13,855 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B — City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #07 P995 J-13 The Milliken median from Century to Foothill. Ground Cover area: 3,330 square feet J-14 The 6th median from Utica to Cleveland. Ground Cover area: 8,559 square feet J-15 The 6th median from Haven to Utica. Ground Cover area: 7,680 square feet J-16 Day Creek median from Church to Foothill. Ground Cover area: 8,466 square feet J-17 The Day Creek median south of Foothill including the traffic circle. Ground Cover area: 6,490 square feet H-1 The Haven median from 4th to 6th. Ground Cover area: 21,205 square feet Converted 8,935 sq. ft. of turf to ground cover effective April 1, 2013. H-2 The Haven medians from 6th to the underpass bridge. The east and west side parkways and slopes on Haven from Acacia to underpass bridge. Ground Cover area: 54,720 square feet Converted 2,960 square feet of turf to ground cover effective April 1, 2013. H-3 The Haven medians from underpass bridge to Arrow. The east and west side parkways and slopes on Haven from the underpass bridge to Jersey. Ground Cover area: 56,210 square feet H-4 The Haven median from Arrow to Foothill. Ground Cover area: 15,156 square feet H-5 The Haven median from Foothill to Church. Ground Cover area: 11,502 square feet FH -1 The Foothill median from Spruce to Haven. Ground Cover area: 4,571 square feet The total square footage for the improvement is 9,141; however, due to the location of the improvement the other half is maintained by landscape maintenance district 4-R. FH -2 The Foothill median from Spruce to Milliken. Ground Cover area: 7,940 square feet The total square footage for the improvement is 15,879; however, due to the location of the improvement the other half is maintained by landscape maintenance district 4- R. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B — City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #07 P996 FH -3 The Foothill median from 790 feet west of Market to Market. Ground Cover area: 4,434 square feet FH -4 The Foothill median from Market to Etiwanda. Ground Cover area: 10,392 square feet FH -5 The Foothill median from 360 feet west of Masi to 516 feet west of Masi. Ground Cover area: 800 square feet The total square footage for the improvement is 1,600; however, due to the location of the improvement the other half is maintained by landscape maintenance district 4-R. FH -6 The Foothill median from Masi Plaza to Rochester. Ground Cover area: 800 square feet The total square footage for the improvement is 1,600; however, due to the location of the improvement the other half is maintained by landscape maintenance district 4-R. FH -7 The Foothill median from Vineyard to Orchard Plaza. Ground Cover area: 2,605 square feet FH -8 The Foothill median from Orchard Plaza to Lion. Ground Cover area: 344 square feet FH -9 The Foothill median from Hellman to Malachite and from Malachite to Archibald. Ground Cover area: 21,474 square feet FH -10 The Foothill median from Archibald to Ramona. Ground Cover area: 4,770 square feet FH -11 The Foothill median from Ramona to Hermosa. Ground Cover area: 5,210 square feet FH -12 The Foothill median from Hermosa to Center. Ground Cover area: 6,329 square feet FH -13 The Foothill median from Center to Haven. Ground Cover area: 6,286 square feet FH -14 The Foothill median from Rochester to 600 feet east of Rochester. Ground Cover area: 1,356 square feet Site reduced to 5,979 square feet due to median renovation. FH -15 The Foothill median from 1,225 feet west of Day Creek to Day Creek. Ground Cover area: 4,905 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B — City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #07 P997 FH -16 The Foothill median from Day Creek to the 15 freeway. Ground Cover area: 9,808 square feet Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B — City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #07 Grove Av., --�- Vineyard Av Hellman Av.;rR� Archltwld Av rmose Av Maven Av N L Ln A t L � o INillikon Av p ���c:. +r N aD N L RoehostaAi �-- n I Elkvanda Av 3 East Av x r n A < r r V Hallman Ave I ® All Archibald Av I Hermosa Av 1. W 0 0 N m 1' Haven Av r CD CD r 3 N � x r n Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B — City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #07 A < r r Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B — City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #07 Carnellan St r V Hallman Ave I ® All Archibald Av I Hermosa Av 1. 1' Haven Av IWIIIkanAv O I � � w --Day Creek BI 1 r 1 O ' w -- - --- EtlwarMa Av 1 �-T 1 East Av 1 1 1 i i Cherry Av c I Z Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B — City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #07 P999 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the District levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Operations and Maintenance: Fiscal Year Operations and Maintenance: 2017/18 Budget Expenditures 500 Personnel Services: 10,500 Regular Salaries $ 75,550 Part-time Salaries 21,600 Fringe Benefits 39,280 Subtotal - Personnel 136,430 Operations and Maintenance: Operations and Maintenance: Computer Software 500 O & K4/General 10,500 O & M/Facilities 11,500 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 22,500 Contract Services: Contract Services/General 531,700 Contract Services/Facilities 120,300 Tree Maintenance 23,410 Subtotal - Contract Services 675,410 Utilities: Telephone Utilities 760 Water Utilities 110,960 Electric Utilities 58,720 Subtotal - Utilities 170,440 Assessment Administration 6,570 Admin./General Overhead 35,570 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 910,490 Total Expenditures Budget $ 1,046,920 Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B — City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #07 S [OIlIe Fiscal Year 2017/18 Budget Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies $ 813,720 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 10,700 Subtotal - Taxes 824,420 Other Revenues: Interest Earnings 17,790 Parking Permits 240,000 Other Revenue 340 Subtotal - Other Revenues: 258,130 Total Revenues Budget $ 1,082,550 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ 35,630 Total Gross Estimated Assessments $ 821,939.33 Total District EBU Count 2,912.20 Actual Assessment per EBU - Fiscal Year 2017/18 $ 282.24 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU - Fiscal Year 2017/18 $ 352.80 The maximum allowable assessment per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in Fiscal Year 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however, it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Operating Reserve Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2017 $1,587,555 Contribution to Reserve - Fiscal Year 2017/18 35,630 Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2018 $1,623,185 Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B — City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #07 P1001 Definitions of Budaet Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time and part-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Additionally, this includes benefits available to City employees. Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District. Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Utilities: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity, water, and telephone services, as required, for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers in the District. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost of all particular departments and staff of the City, as well as consultants, for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual Engineer's Report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all central services departments of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational District within the City's administrative structure. Capital Outlay: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Other Revenues: This includes other revenues that are not levied through the annual assessments that support the District operations. These other revenues may include: interest earnings, other rental/lease income (cell site tower leases), Park Maintenance Fees, Sports Field User Group Rentals, and parking permits (Metrolink Station paid parking). Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B — City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #07 P1002 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Overview Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 commencing with Section 5000) hof the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]. Section 22547 of the 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement". Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIIID also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights -of -ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. General Benefit Section 4 of Article XIII D of the California Constitution provides that once a local agency which proposes to impose assessments on property has identified those parcels that will have special benefits conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed, the local agency Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B — City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #07 P1003 must next "separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred," and only the special benefits can be included in the amount of the assessments imposed. In this District, the improvements being financed consists of the maintenance of local improvements located within the boundaries of the District and include paseos, street trees, landscaped areas and appurtenant facilities that are located throughout the District and were installed to create a common landscape theme and neighborhood identity for parcels within the District. The improvements are situated within the public rights-of-way of the internal local street network within the District which provides ingress and egress for parcels within the District to access the City's system of arterial streets. Traffic from parcels not within the District do not use the internal local street network or paseos except for the express purpose of accessing properties located within the District, and therefore do not benefit from the improvements. Only parcels which are within the District and proximate to the improvements and within the District are being assessed. Accordingly, there is a direct physical and visual nexus between each parcel being assessed and the improvements to be funded by the assessment that does not exist for parcels outside of the District boundary and that is particular and distinct from that shared by the public at large. Under these circumstances, all of the benefits conferred are direct and local in nature, and provide a benefit to only those parcels located within the boundaries of the District. Based upon this, it has been determined that there is no quantifiable general benefit to the surrounding community and the public in general from the maintenance of the improvements within the boundaries of the District, and therefore no portion of the project costs should be attributed to general benefit. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District and, as such, confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District, only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements is identified and the proportionate special benefit Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B — City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #07 P1004 derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined, however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since Fiscal Year 1996/97. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The EBU method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one EBU. Every other land -use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land -use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land -use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land -Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Property Type (County Use Code) EBU Value Multiplier Non -Residential 1.00 Acre The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2017/18 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B — City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #07 Maximum Allowable Actual Assessment Asessment Rate Total Property Type County Use Code Rate per EBU per EBU Units/Acres Total EBUs Non -Residential $352.80 $282.24 2,912.20 2,912.20 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B — City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #07 Pi 005 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the San Bernardino County Assessor Office, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B — City of Rancho Cucamonga 16 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #07 P1 006 R ` al}lOi g C'd-te3 S aWa_ i� fill ?R I a t�•;1 lj3 fig= Z `, w N M CCD = a �3jEa3=�` d D -� $ d Cn 38� � g CO S ggQ Grove Av W � Jill e}ge3�a 9taitZB; a Carnelian St Vineyard Av rn Hellman Av Hellman Av Archibald Av Archibald Av Hermosa Av Hermosa Av Haven Av Haven Av Milliken Av ._.._.._.._.._.a Milliken Av 4 l... Rochester Av j Rochester Av Day Creek 1311 n j Etiwanda Av Etiwanda Av i i 3 N East D � S C S t o E r N CD o a :J = Cherry Av _ 0 a F D M. 0 w j 9 9 Nto Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B — City of Rancho Cucamonga 17 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #07 P1007 ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2017/18 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2017/18 actual assessment for the District: A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations The following annexations are effective for Fiscal Year 2017/18: n Actual Project Name Total Units/ Acres Total EBUs Property Type Assessment Total DRC2015-00650 2.16 Property Type (County Use Code Rate per EBU Units/Acres Total EBUs Total Assessment Non -Residential $282.24 2,912.20 2,912.20 $821,939.33 Totals 2.40 2,912.201 2,912.201 $821,939.33 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations The following annexations are effective for Fiscal Year 2017/18: n Annexation Date Project Name Total Units/ Acres Total EBUs Property Type 0229-341-03 07/06/2016 DRC2015-00650 2.16 2.16 Non -Residential 0208-353-14 07/20/2016 PM19666 2.22 2.22 Non -Residential 0229-341-15 07/20/2016 DRC2015-00402 2.40 2.40 Non -Residential 0201-055-52 10/03/2016 PM19619 4.07 4.07 Non -Residential 0202-161-10, 11 & 20 12/07/2016 DRC2008-00909 0.67 0.67 Non -Residential Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B — City of Rancho Cucamonga 18 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #07 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2017/18 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R (Terra Vista Planned Community) Pi 008 Lwnrtlmenw- #- 68 Pi 009 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4-111 (TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2700 Fax: 909.477.2849 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Lynne B. Kennedy, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Sam Spagnolo, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER 1 INTRODUCTION 3 Reason for Assessment 3 Process for Annual Assessment 3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 4 Description of the Boundaries of the District 4 Description of Improvements and Services 4 Map of Improvements 12 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 14 District Budget 14 Definitions of Budget Items 16 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 17 Overview 17 General Benefit 17 Special Benefit 18 Method of Assessment Spread 18 Cost of Living Inflator 21 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM 21 ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS 23 Assessment Roll 23 Annexations 23 P1011 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on June 21, 2017, the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 17-045, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R (Terra Vista Planned Community) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed staff to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2017/18 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. Fiscal Year 2017/18 Budget Expenditures Personnel Services $ 1,049,650 Operations and Maintenance 1,229,260 Capital Expenditures 457,000 Total Expenditures Budget 2,735,910 Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies 2,714,850 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 13,750 Subtotal - Taxes 2,728,600 Other Revenues 50,540 Total Revenues Budget 2,779,140 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ 43,230 Total District EBU Count 6,904.87 Actual Assessment per EBU $ 397.15 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU $ 429.39 Land Scape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #8 a [0S V In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. 2. 1 have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, I certify that the Annual Engineer's Report and Assessment Diagram included herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R — City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #08 P1013 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement or facility such as paseos, community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, and providing for the growth, vigor and care of the trees and landscape plant materials. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting of landscape or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the District for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the District by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the District. • Refers to the Engineer's Report, on file with the City Clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the City Clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R — City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #08 0DIC hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including the improvements, to the zones within the District, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. PLANS AND SPECIFI CA TIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area located north of Foothill, west of Rochester, east of Haven, south of Base Line and includes the northeast corner of Base Line and Haven. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of the paseos, parkways, median islands, street trees, parks, landscaped sites and appurtenant facilities that are throughout the District. These improvements are located within the street right-of-ways and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, the pruning, fertilizing, mowing, weeding, pest control, removal of trash/debris, and irrigation of the trees, shrubs, vines, ground cover, and turf. Maintenance of associated improvements and facilities, such as community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, includes but is not limited to, grading and replacement of trail surfacing, trail fence repair and replacement, steel fence painting, repair and replacement, and irrigation systems control, adjustment, trouble -shooting, repair and replacement. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, capital projects and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R — City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #08 P1O15 materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Parks: Spruce Park, Mountain View Park, Ralph M. Lewis Park, Coyote Canyon Park, Milliken Park and West Greenway Park The street trees within the residential parkways and tree maintenance easements to be maintained by the District are on the following streets, located within the boundaries of the District: Amiata Danbury Meyers Bastia Danner Potomac Blackhorse De Anza Radcliff Brandywine Derby Regent Bunkerhill Downing Rockingham Cedarbrook Ellena Saranza Chesterton (s/o Terra Vista to Southhampton Clarisa Fitzpatrick) Terra Vista Corsica Emery (Church to Brandywine) (Countryview to Milliken) Fitzpatrick Wellington Countryview Fulbourn Yorktown (Mt. View to Palacio) Hinton Covington Linaro The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Site # Descriptive Location TV -1 The Base Line median from Haven to the Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: Turf area: Hardscape area: 23,345 square feet 16,545 square feet 10,630 square feet TV -2 The Base Line median from Spruce to the Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 18,863 square feet Turf area: 15,067 square feet Hardscape area: 12,575 square feet TV -3 The Base Line median from Spruce to Milliken. Ground Cover area: 16,670 square feet Turf area: 14,857 square feet Hardscape area: 16,567 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R — City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #08 TV -4 The south side of Base Line from 800 feet east of Spruce to Milliken. The cul-de-sac at the north end of Cascade. Ground Cover area: 16,613 square feet Turf Cover area: 5,324 square feet Hardscape area: 7,950 square feet TV -5 The north side of Terra Vista from Belpine to 112 feet west of Butterfield; Terra Vista median from Spruce to Milliken and the south side of Terra Vista from 164 feet west of Belpine to Belpine. Ground Cover area: 19,738 square feet Turf area: 2,675 square feet Hardscape area: 13,328 square feet TV -6 The north side of from Spruce to 175 feet north of Countryside and Terra Vista median from Church to Spruce. Ground Cover area: 22,959 square feet Turf area: 6,195 square feet Hardscape area: 11,702 square feet TV -7 The north side of Church from the west side of Deer Creek Channel to Terra Vista. The west side of Terra Vista from Church to 175 feet north of Countryside. Ground Cover area: 9,924 square feet Turf area: 5,378 square feet Hardscape area: 6,426 square feet TV -8 The southeast corner of Church and Haven; the Church median from Haven to Terra Vista and the wash end on the Northwest corner of the Deer Creek Channel and Church. Ground Cover area: 26,876 square feet Hardscape area: 2,306 square feet Hardscape area: 2,788 square feet TV -9 The Church median from Terra Vista to Spruce. Ground Cover area: 7,829 square feet Hardscape area: 6,605 square feet TV -10 The east side of Valencia from Base Line to the pre-school; the south side of Augusta from Valencia to Meadow Lark and the west side of Summerfield from Valencia to Evergreen. Ground Cover area: 20,818 square feet Turf area: 18,634 square feet Hardscape area: 8,666 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R — City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #08 S [1S rN TV -11 The paseo at Parkside and Clover from Parkside to the Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 2,795 square feet Hardscape area: 1,049 square feet TV -12 The east side of Haven from the pre-school to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground Cover area: 6,170 square feet Turf area: 2,091 square feet Hardscape area: 1,060 square feet TV -13 The east side of Spruce from Elm to Mountain View; the north and south sides of Norfolk from Spruce to Cardiff; the south side of Mountain View from Spruce to 290 feet east of Belvedere and the paseo from Spruce to Countryview. Ground Cover area: 8,459 square feet Turf area: 3,355 square feet Hardscape area: 8,886 square feet TV -14 The south side of Mountain View from 290 feet east of Belvedere to 590 feet east of Fairhaven; the paseo south of Mountain View between Belvedere and Fairhaven to Countryview and from Countryview to West Greenway Corridor. Ground Cover area: 19,030 square feet Turf area: 8,430 square feet Hardscape area: 9,262 square feet TV -15 The north side of Mountain View from 634 feet west of Biarritz to Milliken. Ground Cover area: 4,571 square feet Turf area: 4,738 square feet Hardscape area: 5,104 square feet TV -16 The west Greenway Corridor from the northeast corner of Elm and Spruce to West Greenway. Ground Cover area: 15,529 square feet Turf area: 20,884 square feet Hardscape area: 20,626 square feet TV -17 The west side of Milliken from 585 feet north of Mountain View to Mountain View. Ground Cover area: Turf area: Hardscape area: 5,835 square feet 3,564 square feet 2,340 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R — City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #08 TV -18 The south side of Mountain View from approximately 250 feet west of Claridge to Terra Vista. The south side of Terra Vista from Mountain View to East Greenway Corridor. Terra Vista from Mountain View to East Greenway Corridor. Ground Cover area: 18,316 square feet Turf area: 5,944 square feet Hardscape area: 23,800 square feet TV -19 The Terra Vista median from Milliken to Mountain View. The north side of Terra Vista from 68 feet north of Addison to Mountain View. The west side of Mountain View from Grapevine to Terra Vista. Ground Cover area: 20,306 square feet Turf area: 3,886 square feet Hardscape area: 11,478 square feet TV -20 The Church median from Milliken to 675 feet east of Milliken. Ground Cover area: 2,860 square feet Hardscape area: 2,112 square feet TV -21 The Church median from Milliken to Spruce. Ground Cover area: 16,811 square feet Turf area: 335 square feet Hardscape area: 14,880 square feet TV -22 The Milliken median from Mountain View to Foothill. Ground Cover area: 16,436 square feet Hardscape area: 16,267 square feet TV -23 The Milliken underpass from West Greenway Park to Milliken Park. Ground Cover area: 19,271 square feet Turf area: 22,139 square feet Hardscape area: 18,119 square feet TV -24 The east side of Haven from 145 feet south of Creekbridge to 600 feet north of Creekbridge; the north side of Creekbridge from Brookside to Haven and the paseo from Creekbridge and Brookside to the Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 5,851 square feet Turf area: 9,965 square feet Hardscape area: 4,351 square feet TV -25 The east side of Haven form 145 feet south of Creekbridge to 410 feet south of Creekbridge. Ground Cover area: 3,319 square feet Turf area: 1,677 square feet Hardscape area: 1,779 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R — City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #08 S [0S Illy'. TV -26 The paseo at Plymouth south of Essex from Plymouth to the Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 1,956 square feet Hardscape area: 2,385 square feet TV -27 The paseo from Terra Vista to Windsong and from Windsong to Plymouth. Ground Cover area: 2,270 square feet Turf area: 2,731 square feet Hardscape area: 3,332 square feet TV -28 The paseo on the north side of 7552 Hardy. Ground Cover area: 630 square feet Turf area: 733 square feet Hardscape area: 432 square feet TV -29 The East Greenway Corridor from Milliken Park to Terra Vista, including the turf area at the entrance to Tract 16157. Ground Cover area: 17,780 square feet Turf area: 52,403 square feet Hardscape area: 29,888 square feet TV -30 The Milliken Median from Mountain View to Base Line. Ground Cover area: 11,890 square feet Hardscape area: 10,260 square feet TV -31 The paseo from Elm to West Greenway Park. Ground Cover area: 4,770 square feet Hardscape area: 8,900 square feet TV -32 The Greenwich paseo from Greenwich to Muirfield. Ground Cover area: 1,323 square feet Hardscape area: 1,456 square feet TV -33 The south side of Mountain View from 430 feet west of Countryview to Countryview. Ground Cover area: 3,434 square feet Turf area: 1,853 square feet Hardscape area: 1,720 square feet TV -34 The south side of Terra Vista from 390 feet west of Belpine to Belpine. Ground Cover area: 1,342 square feet Turf area: 1,887 square feet Hardscape area: 1,612 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R — City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #08 S [1Yxf: TV -35 The Trail Northeast of Ruth Musser School from Terra Vista to Spruce. Ground Cover area: 9,285 square feet Hardscape area: 5,148 square feet TV -36 The east side of Countryview from Corsica to Mountain View. The south side of Mountain View from Countryview to Milliken. The west side of Milliken from Mountain View to the West Greenway Corridor. Ground Cover area: 9,141 square feet Turf area: 5,895 square feet Hardscape area: 6,058 square feet TV -37 The north side of Meyers from Emery to Elm. Ground Cover area: 5,860 square feet Turf area: 5,300 square feet Hardscape area: 1,283 square feet TV -38 The Church median from Rochester to Terra Vista median from Church to 853 feet north of Church. Ground Cover area: 8,510 square feet Hardscape area: 5,640 square feet TV -39 The north side of Mountain View form 250 feet east of Milliken to Milliken. The east side of Milliken from Mountain View to Terra Vista. Ground Cover area: 16,751 square feet Hardscape area: 15,716 square feet TV -40 The south side of Terra Vista from Milliken to Mountain View. Ground Cover area: 11,630 square feet Hardscape area: 19,738 square feet TV -41 The paseo east of Milliken from Terra Vista south to Mountain View. Ground Cover area: 4,081 square feet Hardscape area: 9,640 square feet TV -42 The north side of Mountain View from Terra Vista to 250 feet east of Milliken. Ground Cover area: 10,994 square feet Hardscape area: 14,777 square feet TV -43 Church median and parkway from Malaga to Terra Vista Parkway. Ground Cover area: 7,506 square feet Hardscape area: 3,955 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R — City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #08 TV -44 The south side of Church from Terra Vista to Rochester. TV -45 TV -46 Ground Cover area: 10,400 square feet Hardscape area: 7,606 square feet The west side of Rochester from Church to Malaga. Ground cover area: 20,693 square feet Hardscape area: 12,450 square feet The north side of Malaga from Church to Rochester. Ground Cover area: 19,843 square feet Hardscape area: 18,000 square feet P1 021 TV -47 The east side of Terra Vista from Church to Brandywine. The paseo from Brandywine to Bunker Hill. The east side of Radcliff from Bunker to Malaga. Ground Cover area: 17,838 square feet Hardscape area: 9,023 square feet TV -48 The Church median from 750 feet east of Milliken to Malaga. Ground Cover area: 5,554 square feet Hardscape area: 9,698 square feet FH -1 The Foothill median from Spruce to Haven. Ground Cover area: 4,571 square feet The total square footage for the improvement is 9,141; however, due to the location of the improvement the other half is maintained by landscape maintenance district 3B. FH -2 The Foothill median from Spruce to Haven. Ground Cover area: 7,940 square feet The total square footage for the improvement is 15,879; however, due to the location of the improvement the other half is maintained by landscape maintenance district 3B. FH -5 The Foothill median from 360 feet west of Masi to 516 feet west of Masi. Ground Cover area: 800 square feet The total square footage for the improvement is 1,600; however, due to the location of the improvement the other half is maintained by landscape maintenance district 3B. FH -6 The Foothill median from Masi Plaza to Rochester. Ground Cover area: 800 square feet The total square footage for the improvement is 1,600; however, due to the location of the improvement the other half is maintained by landscape maintenance district 3B. Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R — City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #08 S lly*' H-5 The Haven median from Foothill to Church. Ground Cover area: 11,502 square feet Converted 10,572 sq ft of turf to ground cover effective April 1, 2013. Area listed is the 50% maintained by the District. An equal amount is maintained by landscape maintenance district 3B. H-6 Haven median from Church to Base Line. Ground Cover area: 9,615 square feet Converted 8,708 sq. ft. of turf to ground cover effective April 1, 2013. Area listed is the 50% maintained by the District. An equal amount is maintained by the General Fund. H-7 The Haven median from Base Line to Southern Pacific railroad tracks. Ground Cover area: 3,130 square feet Converted 3,992 sq. ft. of turf to ground cover effective April 1, 2013. Removed 3,692 sq. ft. of ground cover for turn pocket expansion. Area listed is the 50% maintained by the District. An equal amount is maintained by the General Fund. VG -14 The Base Line median from Milliken to Ellena East. The turf and ground cover on the north side of Base Line from Ellena East to Ellena West. The turf and ground cover on the east side of Ellena West from Base Line and following the curb line to Kenyon. The north side of Ellena West from Kenyon to Casoli. The turf and ground cover on both sides of Casoli from Ellena West to Candela. The turf and ground cover on both sides of Crema from Ellena west to Candela. Ground Cover area: 9,169 square feet The improvements for Ground Cover are 80,287, Turf improves are 62,999 square feet, and Hardscape improvements are 44,826; however, due to the location of the improvements, the District maintains only the south side of the Base Line median from Milliken to Ellena East and the rest is maintained by landscape maintenance district 2. VG -15 The turf and ground cover on the west side of Rochester from the Southern Pacific Railroad to Base Line. The turf and ground cover on the north side of Base Line from Rochester to Ellena East. The Base Line Median from Rochester to Ellena East. The turf and ground cover on the east side of Ellena east from Base Line and continuing along that curb line to 275 feet north of Berra Road. The turf and ground cover on both sides of Berra from Ellena East to Comiso. Ground Cover area: 3,960 square feet The improvements for Ground Cover are 58,887, Turf improves are 57,306 square feet, and Hardscape improvements are 36,014; however, due to the location of the improvements, the District maintains only the south side of the Base Line median from Rochester to Ellena East and the rest is maintained by landscape maintenance district 2. Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R — City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #08 Milliken . II 01 • r Q 0 o' o' m cD 3 0 g 2 U1 'I; In OD 1 j A • � N Nr A P1023 Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R — City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #08 S [lYZ ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the District levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Expenditures Personnel Services: Regular Salaries Overtime Salaries Part-time Salaries Fringe Benefits Subtotal - Personnel Operations and Maintenance: Operations and Maintenance: O & M/General Vehicle Operations and Maintenance Emergency Equipment and Vehicle Rental Emergency Operations & Maintenance Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance Contract Services: Contract Services/General Tree Maintenance Subtotal - Contract Services Utilities: Telephone Utilities Water Utilities Electric Utilities Subtotal - Utilities Assessment Administration Adm in./General Overhead Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance Capital Expenditures: Captial Outlay - Equipment Captial Project Subtotal - Capital Expenditures Total Expenditures Budget Fiscal Year 2017/18 Budget $ 676,020 1,050 47,280 325,300 1,049,650 93,050 6,000 1,700 3,750 104,500 445,580 74,970 520,550 820 325,000 34,320 360,140 22,080 221,990 1,229,260 17,000 440,000 457,000 $ 2,735,910 Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R — City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #08 P1025 Fiscal Year 2017/18 Budget Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies $ 2,714,850 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 13,750 Subtotal - Taxes 2,728,600 Other Revenues: Interest Earnings 47,960 Park Maintenance Fees 2,080 Sports Field User Group Rentals 500 Subtotal - Other Revenues: 50,540 Total Revenues Budget $ 2,779,140 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ 43,230 Total Gross Estimated Assessments $ 2,742,269.12 Total District EBU Count 6,904.87 Actual Assessment per EBU - Fiscal Year 2017/18 $ 397.15 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU - Fiscal Year 2017/18 $ 429.39 The maximum allowable assessment per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved when the property owners on December 2, 2009, voted in favor of a Prop 218 assessment ballot increase with an allowable annual increase by the lesser of 3.5% or the percentage change in the year ending February preceding the start of the Fiscal Year of the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (CPI -U) and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R — City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #08 S 11WI-I Operating Reserve Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2017 $ 4,525,221 Contribution to Reserve - Fiscal Year 2017/18 43,230 Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2018 $ 4,568,451 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time and part-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Additionally, this includes benefits available to City employees. Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District. Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Utilities: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity, water, and telephone services, as required, for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers in the District. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost of all particular departments and staff of the City, as well as consultants, for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual Engineer's Report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all central services departments of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational District within the City's administrative structure. Capital Outlay: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Other Revenues: This includes other revenues that are not levied through the annual assessments that support the District operations. These other revenues may include: interest earnings, other rental/lease income (cell site tower leases), Park Maintenance Fees, Sports Field User Group Rentals, and parking permits (Metrolink Station paid parking). Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R — City of Rancho Cucamonga 16 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #08 S 1'WrA METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Overview Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 commencing with Section 5000) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]. Section 22547 of the 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement." Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights -of -ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. General Benefit Section 4 of Article XIII D of the California Constitution provides that once a local agency which proposes to impose assessments on property has identified those parcels that will have special benefits conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed, the local agency must next "separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred," and only the special benefits can be included in the amount of the assessments imposed. Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R — City of Rancho Cucamonga 17 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #08 In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are incidental general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: the control of dust and insect infestations, and the visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District. However it has been determined that these benefits are incidental and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the District that are not being assessed. Any incidental benefit received by parcels outside of the District is further offset by the incidental benefit received by parcels within the District from the maintenance of landscaping improvements by the other assessment districts within the City. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District and, as such, confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District, only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements is identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined. On December 2, 2009, Proposition 218 assessment ballot increase was approved by the property owners in this District. Therefore, all parcels included in the District boundary, are being levied in accordance with Article XIII D and Proposition 218. Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R — City of Rancho Cucamonga 18 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #08 S [1Y4:1 To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The EBU method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment since there is a total of 2,651 single family parcels within the District which represents 69.1 percent of the total assessable parcels within the District. A method has been developed to convert other land uses to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land - use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family residential parcel. Other residential land uses are assigned Equivalent Dwelling Units (EDU) in proportion to the number of trips generated and average number of occupants per dwelling unit in comparison to the typical single family parcel. Based upon the trip generation data from the ITE Trip Generation Report, San Diego Association of Governments' Guide to Vehicular Traffic Generation Rates which have been adopted by San Bernardino County Transpiration Authority (formerly known as San Bernardino Associated Governments) and the most recent census data for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, condominiums are assigned 0.8 EDU's since the number of residents and number of trips generated per dwelling unit are 80 percent of the typical single family residence. Multi -family residential units are assigned 0.70 EDU's per dwelling unit since the number of residents and number of trips generated per multifamily residential unit are 70 percent of the typical single family residential unit. This reduction is further supported by virtue of the fact that both condominium developments and multi -family residential development have a higher level of landscaping that reduce the benefit received by these parcels from District maintained landscaping. EBU's are assigned to Commercial and Industrial parcels based upon the number of trips generated as well. The ITE Trip Generation Report shows that non-residential uses similar to those found in the District generate from 30 to 400 plus trips per day based upon the specific land use. An average trip generation rate of 135 trips per day was used since the non- residential uses within the district are generally those that result in fewer trips per day per acre, when compared to more intense non-residential uses such as community shopping centers which can generate in excess of 500 trips per day. Based upon an average density of approximately 9 single family residential units per acre and a trip generation rate of 10 trips per day for a typical single family residential unit, the trip generation rate for commercial and industrial parcels is approximately 1.5 times that of an acre developed for single family residential use based upon an average of 135 trips per acre for non- residential uses. The trips generated by non-residential uses has been reduced by approximately 40 percent to account for the number of "pass -by" trips which are those trips which stop at non-residential parcels enroute to/from residential parcels. This reduces the trips generated per acre from 135 to 81. Since non-residential parcels do not receive a significant special benefit from the park facilities maintained by the District, the number of trips generated per acre has been further reduced in proportion to the ratio of expenditures for landscape maintenance versus park maintenance within the District, which has been estimated by the City to be 60% parks and 40% landscaping. Therefore, commercial and industrial parcels have been assigned a value of 3.25 EBU's per acre to represent the special benefit received by those parcels relative to the typical single family residential parcel. Vacant parcels are assigned an EBU value of 0.25 per acre because they receive a lesser benefit from the improvements until such time as development occurs. Publicly owned school parcels are also assigned an EBU value of 0.25 per acre in recognition of the limited benefit they receive from the improvements maintained by the District and the benefit conferred upon other parcels within the District by the open space and landscaping maintained by the School Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R — City of Rancho Cucamonga 19 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #08 P1030 District on their parcels which might be used by properties within the District under joint use agreements between the School District and the City. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land -use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land -Use Equivalent Benefit Units Property Type (County Use Code) EBU Value Multiplier Single Family Residential 1.00 Parcel Condominium 0.80 Unit Multi -Family Residential 0.70 Unit Commercial/Industrial 3.25 Acre Vacant (incl. all undevelped property) 0.25 Acre Schools 0.25 Acre The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2017/18 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Property Type (County Use Code) Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate per EBU Actual Asessment Rate per EBU Total Units/Acres Total EBUs Single Family Residential $429.39 $397.15 2,652.00 2,652.00 Condominium 429.39 397.15 1,227.00 981.60 Multi -Family Residential 429.39 397.15 3,809.00 2,666.30 Commercial/Industrial 429.39 397.15 177.60 577.20 Vacant (incl. all undevelped property) 429.391 397.151 75.681 18.92 Schools 429.391 397.151 35.411 8.85 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R — City of Rancho Cucamonga 20 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #08 P1 031 Cost of Livina Inflator Each fiscal year beginning Fiscal Year 2010/11, the maximum allowable assessment amount may be increased by the lesser of 3.5% or the percentage change in the year ending February preceding the start of the Fiscal Year of the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (CPI -U), for the Los Angeles -Riverside -Orange County area. If for any reason the percentage change is negative the maximum allowable assessment would not be decreased by reason of such negative percentage change and would remain at the amount as computed on the previous fiscal year regardless of any CPI adjustment. The annual assessment cannot exceed the actual costs to operate the District in any given year. If operating costs are such that the maximum assessment amount is not needed, the City would levy only what is needed for that year. The actual assessment rate for Fiscal Year 2017/18 will decrease from $418.05 to $397.15 per single family residence, a rate decrease of 5.0% as compared to Fiscal Year 2016/17. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the San Bernardino County Assessor Office, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R — City of Rancho Cucamonga 21 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #08 PI 032 6 9 F -n g3# D o a�•�Ea�Y �te¢ G 8 9 Grove Av Vineyard Av 4 9 Hellman Av r» Archibald Av Hermosa Av Haven Av Milliken Av Rochester Av Etiwanda Av L-41 1 s �2 East Av �l W D -n "-W S W 5' m in a 3 M a Lj a o n = Cherry Avig CL — v � 3 N N CO) .Z1 CD ...r..���.r Carnelian St - Hellman Av Archibald Av i.Ji Hermosa Av Haven Av J Milliken Av Rochester Av Q Da Creek BQ a Etiwanda Avi y. n Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R — City of Rancho Cucamonga 22 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #08 P1033 ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2017/18 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2017/18 actual assessments for the District: Property Type (County Use Code) Actual Assessment Rate per EBU Total Units/Acres Total EBUs Total Assessment Single Family Residential $397.15 2,652.00 2,652.00 $1,053,241.80 Condominium 397.15 1,227.00 981.60 $389,842.44 Multi -Family Residential 397.15 3,809.00 2,666.30 $1,058,921.05 Commercial/Industrial 397.15 177.60 577.20 $229,234.98 Vacant (incl. all undevelped property) 397.15 75.68 18.921 $7,514.08 Schools 397.15 35.41 8.85 $3,514.78 Totals 7,976.69 6,904.87 $2,742,269.12 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations There were no annexations effective for Fiscal Year 2017/18. Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R — City of Rancho Cucamonga 23 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #08 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2017/18 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 (Andover) P1034 A*chyn,9I - -# oq P1035 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 5 (ANDOVER) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2700 Fax: 909.477.2849 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Lynne B. Kennedy, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Sam Spagnolo, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director P1036 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER 1 INTRODUCTION 3 Reason for Assessment 3 Process for Annual Assessment 3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 4 Description of the Boundaries of the District 4 Description of Improvements and Services 4 Map of Improvements 5 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 7 District Budget 7 Definitions of Budget Items 9 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 9 Overview 9 General Benefit 10 Special Benefit 11 Method of Assessment Spread 11 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM 12 ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS 14 Assessment Roll 14 Annexations 14 P1037 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on June 21, 2017, the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 17-045, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 (Andover) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed staff to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2017/18 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. Fiscal Year 2017/18 Budget Expenditures Personnel Services $ 3,710 Operations and Maintenance 6,260 Total Expenditures Budget 9,970 Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies 2,470 Other Revenues 440 Total Revenues Budget 2,910 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ (7,060) Total District EBU Count 44.00 Actual Assessment per EBU $ 56.65 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU $ 113.29 Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #09 P1 038 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. 2. 1 have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, I certify that the Annual Engineer's Report and Assessment Diagram included herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #09 P1039 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement or facility such as paseos, community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, and providing for the growth, vigor and care of the trees and landscape plant materials. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting of landscape or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the District for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the District by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the District. • Refers to the Engineer's Report, on file with the City Clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the City Clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #09 S [0Z If, hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including the improvements, to the zones within the District, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing, must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to, the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area of the City bounded by Hermosa on the west, 26th on the south, the parcels north of and along Bedford and the parcels west of and along Andover. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services These improvements are located within the street right-of-ways and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, the pruning, fertilizing, mowing, weeding, pest control, removal of trash/debris, and irrigation of the trees, shrubs, vines, ground cover, and turf. Maintenance of associated improvements and facilities, such as community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, includes but is not limited to, grading and replacement of trail surfacing, trail fence repair and replacement, steel fence painting, repair and replacement, and irrigation systems control, adjustment, trouble -shooting, repair and replacement. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, capital projects and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #09 P1 041 use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Parks: Andover Tot Lot. Site # Descriptive Location 1-1-5 The Andover playground on the southwest corner of Andover and Bedford. Ground Cover area Turf area: Hardscape area: 1,506 square feet 1,070 square feet 640 square feet Andover and landscaping are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crews. Main of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #09 a [0Z P% 0 9�ta J���7�73 gjppg Hermosa Av L ], A r n J n v Q cr o m ) -- ° (D 3 r m CD Z Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #09 P1043 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the District levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #09 Fiscal Year 2017/18 Budget Expenditures Personnel Services: Regular Salaries $ 1,850 Part-time Salaries 840 Fringe Benefits 1,020 Subtotal - Personnel 3,710 Operations and Maintenance: Operations and Maintenance: O & M/General 800 Vehicle Operations and Maintenance 70 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 870 Contract Services: Contract Services/General 1,630 Utilities: Water Utilities 710 Electric Utilities 510 Subtotal - Utilities 1,220 Assessment Administration 250 Admin./General Overhead 2,290 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 6,260 Total Expenditures Budget $ 9,970 Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #09 a [0Z L Fiscal Year 2017/18 Budget Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies $ 2,470 Other Revenues: Interest Earnings 440 Total Revenues Budget $ 2,910 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ (7,060) Total Gross Estimated Assessments $ 2,492.60 Total District EBU Count 44.00 Actual Assessment per EBU - Fiscal Year 2017/18 $ 56.65 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU - Fiscal Year 2017/18 $ 113.29 The maximum allowable assessment per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in Fiscal Year 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Operating Reserve Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2017 $ 37,717 Contribution to Reserve - Fiscal Year 2017/18 (7,060) Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2018 $ 30,657 Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #09 P1045 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time and part-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Additionally, this includes benefits available to City employees. Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District. Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Utilities: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity, water, and telephone services, as required, for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers in the District. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost of all particular departments and staff of the City, as well as consultants, for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual Engineer's Report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all central services departments of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational District within the City's administrative structure. Capital Outlay: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Other Revenues: This includes other revenues that are not levied through the annual assessments that support the District operations. These other revenues may include: interest earnings, other rental/lease income (cell site tower leases), Park Maintenance Fees, Sports Field User Group Rentals, and parking permits (Metrolink Station paid parking). METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Overview Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #09 S llZ U.I improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 commencing with Section 5000) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]. Section 22547 of the 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement". Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights -of -ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. General Benefit Section 4 of Article XIII D of the California Constitution provides that once a local agency which proposes to impose assessments on property has identified those parcels that will have special benefits conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed, the local agency must next "separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred," and only the special benefits can be included in the amount of the assessments imposed. In this District, the improvements being financed consists of the maintenance of local improvements located within the boundaries of the Andover Tot Lot at Andover and Bedford and include landscaping (includes ground cover only) and appurtenant facilities that are located throughout the District and were installed to create a common landscape theme and neighborhood identity for parcels within the District. The improvements are situated within the public rights-of-way of the internal local street network within the District which provides ingress Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #09 S [0Z IFA and egress for parcels within the District to access the City's system of arterial streets. City residents and traffic from parcels not within the District do not use the internal local street network or paseos except for the express purpose of accessing properties located within the District, and therefore do not benefit from the improvements. Only parcels which are within the District and proximate to the improvements and within the District are being assessed. Accordingly, there is a direct physical and visual nexus between each parcel being assessed and the improvements to be funded by the assessment that does not exist for parcels outside of the District boundary and that is particular and distinct from that shared by the public at large. Under these circumstances, all of the benefits conferred are direct and local in nature, and provide a benefit to only those parcels located within the boundaries of the District. Based upon this, it has been determined that there is no quantifiable general benefit to the surrounding community and the public in general from the maintenance of the improvements within the boundaries of the District, and therefore no portion of the project costs should be attributed to general benefit. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District and, as such, confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District, only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements is identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined. On December 2, 2009 Proposition 218 assessment ballot increase was approved by the property owners in this district. Therefore, all Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #09 S i[0Z f: parcels included in the District boundary, are being levied in accordance with Article XIII D and Proposition 218. A single family home equals one EBU. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land -Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Property Type (County Use Code) EBU Value Multiplier Single Family Residential 1.00 Parcel The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2017/18 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. The Fiscal Year 2017/18 actual assessment rate will remain at $56.65 per Single Family Residence. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the San Bernardino County Assessor Office, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #09 Maximum Allowable Actual Assessment Asessment Rate Total Property Type County Use Code Rate per EBU per EBU Units/Acres Total EBUs Single Family Residential $113.29 $56.65 44.00 44.00 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. The Fiscal Year 2017/18 actual assessment rate will remain at $56.65 per Single Family Residence. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the San Bernardino County Assessor Office, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #09 S [0Z Vol gsq i:• D "n g v C° $alis W (4 Grove AV 4—••—••---•—••�.�r— a �pa1iILI-."a �. CD CJ1 Vineyard AV A s iellman AV Archibald AV 0 Hermosa AV O Q Haven Av! Milliken AV I Rochester AV Etiwanda AV A �O East AV Rochester AV .......... •Day Creek Etiwanda AV Carnelian St I Hellman AV Archibald AV Hermosa AV Haven AV Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #09 D "n g v N CD CJ1 � C) r' a :3tD Cherry AV P U1 r n 3 o ,- a I, tx Rochester AV .......... •Day Creek Etiwanda AV Carnelian St I Hellman AV Archibald AV Hermosa AV Haven AV Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #09 Pi 050 ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2017/18 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2017/18 actual assessment for the District: A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations There were no annexations for Fiscal Year 2017/18. Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #09 Actual Assessment Total Property Type (County Use Code) Rate per EBU Units/Acres Total EBUs Total Assessment Single Family Residential $56.65 44.00 44.00 $2,492.60 Totals 44.00 ".001 $2,492.60 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations There were no annexations for Fiscal Year 2017/18. Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #09 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2017/18 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R (Caryn Planned Community) P1051 A*(hirRo - -* 10 P1052 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6-11 (CARYN PLANNED COMMUNITY) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2700 Fax: 909.477.2849 1931 aYelTeli AiL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Lynne B. Kennedy, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Sam Spagnolo, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Process for Annual Assessment PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS Description of the Boundaries of the District Description of Improvements and Services Map of Improvements ESTIMATE OF COSTS District Budget Definitions of Budget Items METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Overview General Benefit Special Benefit Method of Assessment Spread Cost of Living Inflator ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS Assessment Roll Annexations 1 3 3 3 4 4 4 8 10 10 12 13 13 13 14 14 16 16 18 18 18 P1053 P1054 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on June 21, 2017, the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 17-045, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R (Caryn Planned Community) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed staff to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2017/18 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. Fiscal Year 2017/18 Budget Expenditures Personnel Services $ 18,620 Operations and Maintenance 496,990 Total Expenditures Budget 515,610 Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies 490,090 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 3,850 Subtotal - Taxes 493,940 Other Revenues 3,410 Transfer In 52,460 Total Revenues Budget 549,810 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ 34,200 Total District EBU Count 1,196.98 Actual Assessment per EBU $ 413.57 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU $ 413.57 Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R — City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #10 Pi 055 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. 2. 1 have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, I certify that the Annual Engineer's Report and Assessment Diagram included herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R — City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #10 P1056 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement or facility such as paseos, community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, and providing for the growth, vigor and care of the trees and landscape plant materials. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting of landscape or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the District for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the District by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the District. • Refers to the Engineer's Report, on file with the City Clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the City Clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R — City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #10 P1057 hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including the improvements, to the zones within the District, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing, must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area located north of the 210 Freeway, south of Banyan Street, west of Rochester and east of Milliken, also known as the Caryn Planned Community. The boundaries also include Tract No. 13835 east of Rochester and Tracts No. 13748, 13857 & 13858 west of Milliken. Zone 1 is the area generally located west of Rochester and east of Milliken. Zone 2 is the area generally located east of Rochester and west of Milliken. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements maintained by the District include the paseos, community trails, trees, landscaped sites and appurtenant facilities that are throughout the District. These improvements are located within the street right-of-ways and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, the pruning, fertilizing, mowing, weeding, pest control, removal of trash/debris, and irrigation of the trees, shrubs, vines, ground cover, and turf. Maintenance of associated improvements and facilities, such as community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, includes but is not limited to, grading and replacement of trail surfacing, trail fence repair and replacement, steel fence painting, repair and replacement, and irrigation systems control, adjustment, trouble -shooting, repair and replacement. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, capital projects and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R — City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #10 Pi 058 addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Site # Descriptive Location CC -1 The southside of Banyan from 1290 feet west of Milliken to Milliken. The west side of Milliken median from Banyan to 292 south of Vintage. Ground Cover area: 96,892 square feet Turf area: 17,945 square feet Hardscape area: 13,944 square feet CC -3 The paseo on the west side of Morning from Morning to Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 2,801 square feet Turf area: 124 square feet Hardscape area: 4,609 square feet CC -4 The west side of Morning, from Banyan to Starview. The north side of Starview, from Morning to Star View. Ground Cover area: 14,273 square feet Turf Cover area: 5,513 square feet Hardscape area: 5,000 square feet CC -5 Silver Sun paseo from the end of Silver Sun cul-de-sac to Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 25,890 square feet Turf area: 12,084 square feet Hardscape area: 1,350 square feet CC -6 The east and west side of Netherlands View from Vintage to Vintage. The Netherlands View paseo from Netherlands View to Mt. Sterling. Ground Cover area: 88,902 square feet Turf area: 676 square feet Hardscape area: 23,650 square feet CC -7 The east and west side of Hillview from Mt. Rainer to Kettle Peak. Ground Cover area: 14,930 square feet Turf area: 6,318 square feet Hardscape area: 12,236 square feet CC -8 The paseo from Hillview Loop to Vintage. Ground Cover area: 42,107 square feet Hardscape area: 22,752 square feet Hardscape area: 4,089 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R — City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #10 Pi 059 CC -9 The south side of Vintage from 250 feet west of Hillview to Hillview. The west side of Hillview from Vintage to Kettle Peak. The west side of Kettle Peak from Hillview to Donner Pass. The east side of Hillview from Kettle Peak to Tioga Peak. Ground Cover area: 47,334 square feet Turf area: 4,954 square feet Hardscape area: 9,088 square feet CC -10 The east side of Terrace View from Vintage to Butler Peak. The west side of Terrace View from Rainbow Falls to Vintage. Ground Cover area: 24,603 square feet Hardscape area: 10,760 square feet CC -11 The paseo from Caryn School to Banyan. The south side of Banyan from the paseo to Rochester. The east and west side of Mt. Baldy from Banyan to Sierra Crest View. The north side of Sierra Crest View from Hilltop to Woodland. Ground Cover area: 47,507 square feet Turf area: 7,810 square feet Hardscape area: 7,825 square feet CC -12 The Separation Paseo from Vintage to Pinnacle Peak. Ground Cover area: 50,325 square feet Turf area: 15,021 square feet Hardscape area: 7,675 square feet CC -13 The east side of Hillview from Tioga Peak to Vintage. The south side of Vintage from Hillview to Terrace View. The north side of Vintage from Hillview to Caryn School. The east side of Terrace View from Vintage to Mt San Antonio. Ground Cover area: 26,162 square feet Turf area: 4,508 square feet Hardscape area: 12,928 square feet CC -14 The east side of Sierra Crest View from Mt. Waverly to Vintage. The north side of Vintage from Sierra Crest View to Sierra Crest View. The east and west side of Sierra Crest View from Vintage to Mt. Wilson. The south side of Vintage from Netherlands View to 330 feet west of Netherlands View. Ground Cover area: 73,250 square feet Turf area: 16,525 square feet Hardscape area: 9,885 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R — City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #10 P1 060 CC -15 The south side of Sierra Crest View from Mt. Waverly to Mt. Cambridge. The north side of Sierra Crest View from Mt. Cambridge to Woodland. The north side of Sierra Crest View from Hilltop to Caryn School. The Sierra Crest View paseo from Sierra Crest View to Mt. Sherman. Ground Cover area: 70,990 square feet Turf area: 7,699 square feet Hardscape area: 20,055 square feet CC -16 The south side of Vintage from Netherlands View to Rochester. The north side of Vintage from Rochester to Sierra Crest View. The east and west side of Sierra Crest View from Mt. Wilson to Mt. Cambridge. The Netherlands View Paseo from Vintage to Mt. Sterling. Ground Cover area: 77,202 square feet Turf area: 3,954 square feet Hardscape area: 18,195 square feet CC -17 The east side of Milliken from Vintage to Banyan. Ground Cover area: 13,740 square feet Turf area: 9,088 square feet Hardscape area: 6,460 square feet CC -18 The north side of Vintage from Milliken to Hillview. The south side of Vintage from 104 feet west of Hillview to Milliken. Ground Cover area: 32,287 square feet Turf area: 3,889 square feet Hardscape area: 11,188 square feet CC -19 The Terrace View paseo from Vintage to Terrace View. Ground Cover area: 17,469 square feet Turf area: 15,617 square feet Hardscape area: 2,736 square feet CC -20 The east side of Terrace View from Mt. San Antonio to EI Capitan. The west side of Terrace View from Butler Peak to Mt. San Antonio. Ground Cover area: 20,627 square feet Hardscape area: 20,017 square feet Hardscape area: 7,888 square feet CC -21 The west side of Rochester from Banyan to 317 feet south of Vintage. Ground Cover area: 31,292 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R — City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #10 P1 061 CC -22 The south side of Vintage from Terrace View to Sierra Crest View. The east and west side of Hillview from Vintage to Mt. Rainer. Ground Cover area: 11,609 square feet Turf area: 3,763 square feet Hardscape area: 6,524 square feet CC -23 The south side of Banyan from Milliken to Butler Peak. The west side of Butler Peak from Banyan to Terrace View. The north side of Terrace View from Butler Peak to Rainbow Falls. Ground Cover area: 12,132 square feet Hardscape area: 528 square feet CC -24 The north side of Terrace View from EI Capitan to Butler Peak. The east side of Butler Peak from Terrace View to Banyan. The south side of Banyan from Butler Peak to 990 feet east of Butler Peak. Ground Cover area: 14,452 square feet Hardscape area: 1,600 square feet CC -26 The east side of Rochester from 210 freeway to Vintage. The north and south side of Vintage from Rochester to Thunder Mountain. The west side of Rochester from 317 feet south of Vintage to the 210 freeway. Ground Cover area: 35,037 square feet Hardscape area: 19,779 square feet CC -27 The Milliken median and the west side of Milliken from 292 feet south of Vintage to 210 freeway. Ground Cover area: 13,365 square feet Hardscape area: 12,300 square feet CC -28 The east side of Milliken from Vintage to the 210 freeway right-of-way. Ground Cover area: 17,724 square feet Cobble area: 2,387 square feet Hardscape area: 5,810 square feet Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R — City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #10 PI 062 0 �tlai�r;�•�g Ln w i e 3�� S a; • ��3�Ic�1���� n •Cis_-C� Milliken Av n N� J 00 ~ 1N w Q) won1 ju w ./ al n T 0 1(D tD 0*1 Q RochesterAv 0 1 N rn � I � KCD W �— Q—`� Z Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R — City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #10 P1063 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the District levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Total Expenditures Budget $ 515,610 Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R — City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #10 Fiscal Year 2017/18 Budget Expenditures Personnel Services: Regular Salaries $ 12,760 Fringe Benefits 5,860 Subtotal - Personnel 18,620 Operations and Maintenance: Operations and Maintenance: O & MIGeneral 10,900 Emergency Equipment and Vehicle Rental 200 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 11,100 Contract Services: Contract Services/General 233,220 Tree Maintenance 28,350 Subtotal - Contract Services 261,570 Utilities: Water Utilities 175,970 Electric Utilities 9,630 Subtotal - Utilities 185,600 Assessment Administration 7,030 Adm in./General Overhead 31,690 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 496,990 Total Expenditures Budget $ 515,610 Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R — City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #10 P1064 Fiscal Year 2017/18 Budget Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies $ 490,090 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 3,850 Subtotal - Taxes 493,940 Other Revenues: Interest Earnings 3,410 Transfer In: Transfer In - General Fund 52,460 Total Revenues Budget $ 549,810 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ 34,200 Total Gross Estimated Assessments $ 495,035.02 Total District EBU Count 1,196.98 Actual Assessment per EBU - Fiscal Year 2017/18 $ 413.57 The maximum allowable assessment per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved when the property owners on September 1, 2010, voted in favor of a Proposition 218 assessment ballot increase with an allowable annual increase by the lesser of 3.0% or the percentage change in the year ending February preceding the start of the Fiscal Year of the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (CPI -U) and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however, it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R — City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #10 P1065 Operating Reserve Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2017 $ 329,915 Contribution to Reserve - Fiscal Year 2017/18 34,200 Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2018 $ 364,115 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time and part-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Additionally, this includes benefits available to City employees. Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District. Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Utilities: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity, water, and telephone services, as required, for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers in the District. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost of all particular departments and staff of the City, as well as consultants, for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual Engineer's Report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all central services departments of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational District within the City's administrative structure. Capital Outlay: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Other Revenues: This includes other revenues that are not levied through the annual assessments that support the District operations. These other revenues may include: interest earnings, other rental/lease income (cell site tower leases), Park Maintenance Fees, Sports Field User Group Rentals, and parking permits (Metrolink Station paid parking). Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R — City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #10 P1066 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Overview Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 commencing with Section 5000) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]. Section 22547 of the 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement". Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights -of -ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. General Benefit Section 4 of Article XIII D of the California Constitution provides that once a local agency which proposes to impose assessments on property has identified those parcels that will have special benefits conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed, the local agency must next "separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred," and only the special benefits can be included in the amount of the assessments imposed. Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R — City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #10 P1067 In this District, the improvements being financed consists of the maintenance of local improvements located within the boundaries of the District and include paseos, street trees, landscaped areas and appurtenant facilities that are located throughout the District and were installed to create a common landscape theme and neighborhood identity for parcels within the District. The improvements are situated within the public rights-of-way of the internal local street network within the District which provides ingress and egress for parcels within the District to access the City's system of arterial streets. City residents and traffic from parcels not within the District do not use the internal local street network or paseos except for the express purpose of accessing properties located within the District, and therefore do not benefit from the improvements. Only parcels which are within the District and proximate to the improvements and within the District are being assessed. Accordingly, there is a direct physical and visual nexus between each parcel being assessed and the improvements to be funded by the assessment that does not exist for parcels outside of the District boundary and that is particular and distinct from that shared by the public at large. Under these circumstances, all of the benefits conferred are direct and local in nature, and provide a benefit to only those parcels located within the boundaries of the District. Based upon this, it has been determined that there is no quantifiable general benefit to the surrounding community and the public in general from the maintenance of the improvements within the boundaries of the District, and therefore no portion of the project costs should be attributed to general benefit. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District and, as such, confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District, only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements is identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R — City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #10 P1068 To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The EBU method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one EBU. Every other land -use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land -use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. Vacant parcels are assigned an EBU value of 0.25 EBU's per acre because they receive a lesser benefit from the improvements until such time as development occurs. Publicly owned school parcels are also assigned an EBU value of 0.25 EBU's per acre in recognition of the limited benefit they receive from the improvements which are provided for the use and benefit of the residential units within the District, and the benefit conferred upon other parcels within the District by the open space and landscaping maintained by the School District on their parcels which might be used by properties within the District under joint use agreements between the School District and the City. There are two benefit zones within the District: Zone 1 and Zone 2. Parcels in Zone 2 are assigned 0.75 EBU per dwelling unit due to the reduction in special benefit they receive as a result of their location relative to the majority of the improvements maintained by the District. Zone 2 parcels are on the far east and west side of the District. Therefore, parcels within Zone 2 do not receive the same special benefit from the improvements due to their proximity, as parcels within Zone 1 which are assigned 1.00 EBU per dwelling unit and are generally located adjacent to or in close proximity to the improvements. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land -use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land -Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Property Type (County Use Code) EBU Value Multiplier Single Family Residential - Zone 1 1.00 Parcel Single Family Residential - Zone 2 0.75 Parcel School 0.25 Acre Undeveloped 0.25 Acre The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R — City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #10 P1069 The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2017/18 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Property Type (County Use Code) Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate per EBU Actual Asessment Rate per EBU Total Units/Acres Total EBUs Single Family Residential - Zone 1 $413.57 $413.57 963.00 963.00 Single Family Residential - Zone 1 413.57 413.57 310.00 232.50 School 413.57 413.57 5.35 1.34 Undeveloped 413.571 413.57 0.541 0.14 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Cost of Living Inflator Each fiscal year beginning Fiscal Year 2011/12, the maximum allowable assessment amount may be increased by the lesser of 3.0% or the percentage change in the year ending February preceding the start of the Fiscal Year of the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (CPI -U), for the Los Angeles -Riverside -Orange County area. If for any reason the percentage change is negative the maximum allowable assessment would not be decreased by reason of such negative percentage change and would remain at the amount as computed on the previous fiscal year regardless of any CPI adjustment. The annual assessment cannot exceed the actual costs to operate the District in any given year. If operating costs are such that the maximum assessment amount is not needed, the City would levy only what is needed for that year. The actual assessment rate for Fiscal Year 2017/18 will increase from $402.65 to $413.57 per single-family residence Zone 1 and from $301.99 to $310.18 per single family residence Zone 2, a CPI increase of 2.71% as compared to Fiscal Year 2016/17. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the San Bernardino County Assessor Office, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R — City of Rancho Cucamonga 16 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #10 S [1ilf: a, e11at==� FF _111, M D O 03 Grove Av [Bill! =a=?= M ?'._111111 Vineyard Av s cn Hellman Av Archibald Av Hermosa Av Haven Av Milliken Av Rochester Av Etiwanda Av----- g c East Av .I 4 M N D 1 ryT� S T IC 0 X� crD 0 0 N c. N O r - N � fD N N a) N W r a Cherry Av N CL Rochester Av Dav Creek BI Etiwanda Carnelian St Hellman Av Archibald Av Hermosa Av Haven Av Milliken Av r a>I CL n a c� n c� A� • I' Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R — City of Rancho Cucamonga 17 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #10 P1071 ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2017/18 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2017/18 actual assessments for the District: Property Type (County Use Code) Actual Assessment Rate per EBU Total Units/Acres Total EBUs Total Assessment Single Family Residential - Zone 1 $413.57 963.00 963.00 $398,267.91 Single Family Residential - Zone 2 413.57 310.00 232.50 96,155.03 School 413.57 5.35 1.34 554.18 Undeveloped 413.57 0.54 0.14 57.90 Totals 1,278.891 1,196.981 $495,035.02 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations There were no annexations for Fiscal Year 2017/18. Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R — City of Rancho Cucamonga 18 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #10 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2017/18 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) -A-} Chtr e,r� 4 11 P1073 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 (NORTH ETIWANDA) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2700 Fax: 909.477.2849 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Lynne B. Kennedy, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Sam Spagnolo, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director S [1iL TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER 1 INTRODUCTION 3 Reason for Assessment 3 Process for Annual Assessment 3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 4 Description of the Boundaries of the District 4 Description of Improvements and Services 4 Map of Improvements 10 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 12 District Budget 12 Definitions of Budget Items 14 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 15 Overview 15 General Benefit 15 Special Benefit 16 Method of Assessment Spread 16 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM 18 ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS 20 Assessment Roll 20 Annexations 20 P1075 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on June 21, 2017 the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 17-045, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed staff to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2017/18 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. Fiscal Year 2017/18 Budget Expenditures Personnel Services $ 204,760 Operations and Maintenance 932,070 Total Expenditures Budget 1,136,830 Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies 934,130 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 11,860 Subtotal - Taxes 945,990 Other Revenues 40,920 Transfer In 50,000 Total Revenues Budget 1,036,910 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ (99,920) Total District EBU Count 3,073.00 Actual Assessment per EBU $ 307.05 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU $ 307.05 Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #11 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. 2. 1 have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, I certify that the Annual Engineer's Report and Assessment Diagram included herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #11 S [1irA INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include, but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement or facility such as paseos, community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, and providing for the growth, vigor and care of the trees and landscape plant materials. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting of landscape or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the District for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the District by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the District. • Refers to the Engineer's Report, on file with the City Clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the City Clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #11 hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including the improvements, to the zones within the District, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area of the City known as North Etiwanda, which is generally bounded by the 210 Freeway on the south, 1-15 Freeway on the east, and City limits on the north and east. Typically, parcels have been annexed to the District as they have been developed. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of the paseos, parkways, median islands, street trees, parks, landscaped sites and appurtenant facilities that are throughout the District. These improvements are located within the street right-of-ways and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, the pruning, fertilizing, mowing, weeding, pest control, removal of trash/debris, and irrigation of the trees, shrubs, vines, ground cover, and turf. Maintenance of associated improvements and facilities, such as community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, includes but is not limited to, grading and replacement of trail surfacing, trail fence repair and replacement, steel fence painting, repair and replacement, and irrigation systems control, adjustment, trouble -shooting, repair and replacement. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, capital projects and all necessary costs associated with the Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #11 S [1iF: maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Parks: Etiwanda Creek Park. Site # Descriptive Location EN -1 The north side of Wilson from San Sevaine to Ridgeline. The east side of Ridgeline from Wilson to Arcadia. Ground Cover area: 27,325 square feet Turf area: 19,334 square feet Hardscape area: 840 square feet EN -2 The Metropolitan Water District easement on the south side of Crescenta from San Marino to Ridgeline. Ground Cover area: 38,104 square feet Turf area: 41,250 square feet Hardscape area: 9,000 square feet EN -3 The Wilson median from Wardman Bullock to San Sevaine. Ground Cover area: 9,016 square feet Hardscape area: 11,088 square feet EN -4 The Planters on the north side of the drainage easement that is between and parallel to Highland and Arapaho from Etiwanda east to the end. Ground Cover area: 63,972 square feet EN -5 The south side of Wilson from 1,115 feet west of San Sevaine to 205 feet east of San Sevaine. The east side of San Sevaine from Wilson to Youngs Canyon. Ground Cover area: 45,584 square feet Turf area: 3,527 square feet EN -6 The north side of Wilson from Wardman Bullock to Ridgeline. The west side of Ridgeline from Wilson to 120 feet north of Arcadia. Ground Cover area: 29,226 square feet Turf area: 15,136 square feet Hardscape area: 1,300 square feet EN -7 The parkway on the eastside of Wardman Bullock from Wilson to 857 feet north of Glendora. The cobblestone between the tract wall and the flood wall will be handled for debris pickup and weed control on an as needed basis. Ground Cover area: 10,268 square feet Hardscape area: 31,549 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #11 Pi 080 EN -8 The south side of Crescenta from Ridgeline to Crestline. Ground Cover area: 50,035 square feet Turf area: 35,960 square feet Hardscape area: 10,000 square feet EN -9 The paseo from Meadow Brook to Rock Creek. Ground Cover area: 1,400 square feet Turf area: 6,555 square feet Hardscape area: 2,820 square feet EN -10 The paseo from Etiwanda to Pacific Crest. The west side of Etiwanda from 175 feet north of North Rim to 171 feet south of Golden Prairie. Ground Cover area: 49,020 square feet Turf area: 4,445 square feet Hardscape area: 13,026 square feet EN -11 The paseo south of Ridge Crest to southern boundary of Tract 14139. This site is temporarily maintained by another contractor and was deleted from the contract as of July 16, 2001; however, this site is still the City's property. Ground Cover area: 3,548 square feet Turf area: 800 square feet Hardscape area: 4,280 square feet EN -12 The cul-de-sac on the north side of Ridgecrest at Etiwanda Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 1,870 square feet Turf area: 700 square feet Hardscape area: 450 square feet EN -13 The north side of Wilson from 574 feet west of Cherry to the channel east of San Sevaine. The Wilson median from Cherry to San Sevaine. The east side of San Sevaine from Wilson to 136 feet north of Crescenta. Ground Cover area: 46,611 square feet Turf area: 5,037 square feet EN -14 The west side of San Sevaine from 150 feet north of Wilson to 136 feet north of Crescenta. Ground Cover area: 55,166 square feet Turf area: 235 square feet Hardscape area: 6,975 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #11 Pi 081 EN -15 The north side of Youngs Canyon from 500 feet east of Koch to 692 feet west of Koch. The south side of Youngs Canyon from 349 feet east of Koch to 692 feet west of Koch. The east and west side of Koch place from Youngs Canyon to 132 feet north of Youngs Canyon. The west side of Koch from Youngs Canyon to 132 feet south of Youngs Canyon. The east side of Koch from 82 feet south of Youngs Canyon to Youngs Canyon. The trailhead north east of the east end of Youngs Canyon to the south end of San Sevaine Horse Trail. The south end of San Sevaine Horse from the trail head to 254 feet north of trailhead. Ground Cover area: 42,925 square feet Hardscape area: 14,308 square feet EN -16 The east side of Wardman Bullock from 225 feet south of San Segundo to 80 feet north of Dona. Ground Cover area: 2,056 square feet Hardscape area: 3,450 square feet EN -17 The north side of Colonbero from San Sevaine Channel to Guidera. The south side of Colonbero from San Sevaine Channel to 400 feet north of Guidera. The north side of Aggazzotti from Colonbero to 4 75 feet east of Colonbero. This site has a pump which will be adjusted and maintained by City personnel. Ground Cover area: 43,241 square feet Hardscape area: 29,125 square feet EN -18 The north side of Aggazzotti from San Antonio to San Sevaine. The west side of San Sevaine from Aggazzotti to 702 feet south of Aggazzotti. The east side of San Sevaine from 702 feet south of Aggazzotti to Regina. Ground Cover area: 47,823 square feet Hardscape area: 30,986 square feet EN -19 The south side of Wilson from Etiwanda to Estates. Ground Cover area: 45,727 square feet Hardscape area: 19,229 square feet EN -20 The south side of Wilson form Bluegrass to Estates. Ground Cover area: 85,155 square feet Hardscape area: 48,784 square feet EN -21 The north side of Wilson from Etiwanda to Cervantes. The Wilson median from Etiwanda to Cervantes. The Westside of Etiwanda from Wilson to Del Norte. Ground Cover area: 88,795 square feet Hardscape area: 27,128 square feet EN -22 The north and south side of Vintage from 165 feet east of Country View to 338 feet west of Country View. Ground Cover area: 13,603 square feet Hardscape area: 7,365 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #11 P1 082 EN -23 The north side of Wilson and median from Etiwanda west to Etiwanda. The east side of Etiwanda from Wilson to 1150 feet north of Wilson. Ground Cover area: 32,027 square feet Hardscape area: 29,567 square feet EN -24 The north side of Vintage from 360 feet west of Ascot to 230 feet east of Countrywood. The south side of Vintage from Ascot to 500 feet east of Countrywood. Ground Cover area: 34,707 square feet Hardscape area: 92,600 square feet EN -25 The east side of Bluegrass from Banyan to 610 feet north of Banyan. Ground Cover area: 4,054 square feet Hardscape area: 5,819 square feet EN -26 The south side of Banyan from Bluegrass to Greenwood. Ground Cover area: 6,240 square feet Hardscape area: 3,200 square feet EN -27 The south side of Banyan from Laurel Blossom to Etiwanda. Ground Cover area: 1,703 square feet Hardscape area: 8,417 square feet EN -28 The north side of Wilson from Cervantes to 1715 feet west of Cervantes. The west side of Cervantes from Carmel Knolls to Wilson. The paseo from Wilson to Tejas. The median on Wilson from Cervantes to Bluegrass. The following temporary landscape: There is one planter on the west side of Altura at Tejas. There are five planters on the south side of Tejas from Altura to 195 feet east of Altura. Ground Cover area: 25,048 square feet Hardscape area: 22,532 square feet EN -29 The south side of Banyan from 787 feet west of East to East. The west side of East from Banyan to 600 feet south of Blue Gum. The east side of East from Banyan to 537 feet south of Banyan. Ground Cover area: 16,111 square feet Hardscape area: 15,774 square feet EN -30 The east side of Bluegrass from 257 feet south of Churchill to 418 feet north of Churchill. Ground Cover area: 9,303 square feet Hardscape area: 5,302 square feet EN -31 The south side of Banyan from 375 feet south of Cashew to Rose. The north side of Banyan from 435 feet west of Peak to Wardman Bullock. Ground Cover area: 53,000 square feet Hardscape area: 26,855 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #11 P1 083 EN -32 The landscaping south of the equestrian trail from 210 feet west of Grovewood to 1,170 feet east of Grovewood. Ground Cover area: 6,900 square feet EN -33 The north side of Youngs Canyon from 600 feet east of Banyan to Banyan. The east side of Wardman Bullock from Banyan to Wilson. The south side of Wilson from Wardman Bullock to 635 feet east of Fields. Ground Cover area: 66,601 square feet Hardscape area: 46,332 square feet EN -34 The west side of Wardman Bullock from Wilson to Banyan. Parkview from Wardman Bullock to Soledad. Ground Cover area: 56,314 square feet Hardscape area: 28,428 square feet EN -35 The north side of Day Creek from Etiwanda to Indian Wells. Ground Cover area: 160,737 square feet Hardscape area: 128,254 square feet EN -36 The south side of Day Creek from 380 feet north of Coyote to Etiwanda. The west side of Etiwanda from Day Creek to 170 feet north of North Rim. The west side of Day Creek from 380 feet north of Coyote to Indian Wells. Ground Cover area: 58,398 square feet Hardscape area: 68,127 square feet EN -37 The east side of East from 235 feet south of Hunt Club to 375 feet north of Hunt Club. Ground Cover area: 5,559 square feet Hardscape area: 5,231 square feet EN -38 The west side of East from 236 feet north of Philly to 245 feet south of Philly. Ground Cover area: 4,605 square feet Hardscape area: 3,394 square feet EN -39 The south side of Banyan from Golden Lock to Raindrop. Ground Cover area 6,024 square feet Hardscape area: 330 square feet EN -40 The west side of Wardman Bullock from Colonbero to Breeders Cup. The east side of Wardman Bullock from Colonbero to 385 feet south of Colonbero. Ground Cover area: 28,527 square feet Hardscape area: 21,723 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #11 P1 084 EN -41 The north side of Colonbero from Wardman Bullock to Ambleside. The south side of Colonbero from 150 feet east of Wardman Bullock to Ambleside. The east side of Ambleside from Colonbero to 700 feet north of Colonbero. Ground Cover area: 17,065 square feet Hardscape area: 12,990 square feet EN -42 The west side of Wardman Bullock from 778 feet north of Coral Sky to Wilson. The north side of Wilson from Wardman Bullock to 218 feet west of Compass. The east and west sides of Compass. from Wilson to the entrance monuments. Ground Cover area: 31,809 square feet Hardscape area: 34,321 square feet Parks, ground cover, shrubs and turf areas that make up parkways, median islands and paseos are maintenance under contract by a private landscape maintenance company. Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #11 Pi 085 e L N a7 y �j {Z31 s+3) OIt Ilia?�7s 3 l G] ;5 1t�sa� ! Day Creek BI 3 p9 III 3 1( Y+ � i a L• Y1s7iS // m m z �., m I 413,111L, II I .� z z r . ■IIF+ Etiwanda Avm M z m .m w 2 o L 7 v! EastAv '�„ --2 M � a v 3 f V � � I mrn �\ � m m rn \ ( M N Z~ M z €o�` •mom 1 M •� Z M �— Z \ w i 10 I r— ■ cc r 1z � d m m a r -4 = '� 0 0 N r c(o c N —- z Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 - City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #11 P1086 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the District levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Total Expenditures Budget $ 1,136,830 Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #11 Fiscal Year 2017/18 Budget Expenditures Personnel Services: Regular Salaries $ 128,920 Part-time Salaries 13,160 Fringe Benefits 62,680 Subtotal - Personnel 204,760 Operations and Maintenance: Operations and Maintenance: O & M/General 33,700 O & M/Facilities 1,500 Emergency Equipment and Vehicle Rental 2,200 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 37,400 Contract Services: Contract Services/General 395,810 Contract Services/Facilities 2,750 Tree Maintenance 7,450 Subtotal - Contract Services 406,010 Utilities: Telephone Utilities 820 Water Utilities 356,470 Electric Utilities 29,180 Subtotal - Utilities 386,470 Assessment Administration 16,910 Admin./General Overhead 84,600 Other Expenses 680 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 932,070 Total Expenditures Budget $ 1,136,830 Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #11 P1087 The maximum allowable assessment per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in Fiscal Year 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however, it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #11 Fiscal Year 2017/18 Budget Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies $ 934,130 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 11,860 Subtotal - Taxes 945,990 Other Revenues: Interest Earnings 9,130 Other Rental/Lease Income 25,660 Park Maintenance Fees 540 Sports Field User Group Rentals 5,590 Subtotal - Other Revenues: 40,920 Transfer In 50,000 Total Revenues Budget $ 1,036,910 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ (99,920) Total Gross Estimated Assessments $ 943,564.65 Total District EBU Count 3,073.00 Actual Assessment per EBU - Fiscal Year 2017/18 $ 307.05 The maximum allowable assessment per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in Fiscal Year 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however, it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #11 Pi 088 Operating Reserve Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2017 $946,947 Contribution to Reserve - Fiscal Year 2017/18 99,920 Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2018 $847,027 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time and part-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Additionally, this includes benefits available to City employees. Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District. Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Utilities: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity, water, and telephone services, as required, for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers in the District. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost of all particular departments and staff of the City, as well as consultants, for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual Engineer's Report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all central services departments of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational District within the City's administrative structure. Capital Outlay: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Other Revenues: This includes other revenues that are not levied through the annual assessments that support the District operations. These other revenues may include: interest earnings, other rental/lease income (cell site tower leases), Park Maintenance Fees, Sports Field User Group Rentals, and parking permits (Metrolink Station paid parking). Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #11 Pi 089 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Overview Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 commencing with Section 5000) hof the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]. Section 22547 of the 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement". Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights -of -ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. General Benefit Section 4 of Article XIII D of the California Constitution provides that once a local agency which proposes to impose assessments on property has identified those parcels that will have special benefits conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed, the local agency must next "separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred," and only the special benefits can be included in the amount of the assessments imposed. Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #11 Pi 090 In this District, the improvements being financed consists of the maintenance of local improvements located within the boundaries of the District and include paseos, street trees, landscaped areas and appurtenant facilities that are located throughout the District and were installed to create a common landscape theme and neighborhood identity for parcels within the District. The improvements are situated within the public rights-of-way of the internal local street network within the District which provides ingress and egress for parcels within the District to access the City's system of arterial streets. City residents and traffic from parcels not within the District do not use the internal local street network or paseos except for the express purpose of accessing properties located within the District, and therefore do not benefit from the improvements. Only parcels which are within the District and proximate to the improvements and within the District are being assessed. Accordingly, there is a direct physical and visual nexus between each parcel being assessed and the improvements to be funded by the assessment that does not exist for parcels outside of the District boundary and that is particular and distinct from that shared by the public at large. Under these circumstances, all of the benefits conferred are direct and local in nature, and provide a benefit to only those parcels located within the boundaries of the District. Based upon this, it has been determined that there is no quantifiable general benefit to the surrounding community and the public in general from the maintenance of the improvements within the boundaries of the District, and therefore no portion of the project costs should be attributed to general benefit. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District and, as such, confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District, only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements is identified and the proportionate special benefit Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 16 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #11 P1091 derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed, Article XIID and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIID and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined, however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since 1996/97 Fiscal Year. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The EBU method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one EBU. The following table provides the weighting factors to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land -Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Property Type (County Use Code) EBU Value Multiplier Single Family Residential 1.00 Parcel The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2017/18 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 17 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #11 Maximum Allowable Actual Assessment Asessment Rate Total PropertType (County Use Code Rate per EBU per EBU Units/Acres Total EBUs Single Family Residential $307.051 $307.051 3,073.001 3,073.00 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 17 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #11 P1092 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the San Bernardino County Assessor Office, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 18 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #11 P1 093 I ^'II??i �y? lsisz=°s 1�19e —n D011 g Grove Av ..�. ._« �a¢�s�l�litii� 3ui�3s49�i�� Vineyard Av M Z Hellman Av Archibald Av Hermosa Av Haven Av� Milliken Av Rochester Av Etiwanda Av_�� a 52 East Av m aWi CD CO CL y m yi 0 8 v ao r 0. co X CL Cherry Av i■ W Rochester Av Day C eek E -N Ew; anda Av D F Carnelian St I Hellman Av Archibald Av Hermosa Av Haven Av Milliken Av r y n a �I. CD v `. n V Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 19 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #11 P1094 ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2017/18 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2017/18 actual assessments for the District: A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations There were no annexations for Fiscal Year 2017/18. Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 20 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #11 Actual Assessment Total Property Type (County Use Code) Rate per EBU Units/Acres Total EBUs Total Assessment Single Family Residential $307.05 3,073.00 3,073.00 $943,564.65 Totals 3,073.001 3,073.001 $943,564.65 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations There were no annexations for Fiscal Year 2017/18. Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 20 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #11 Annual Engineering Report Fiscal Year 2017/18 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) Pi 095 ,},chnienf # 14— P1096 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 8 (SOUTH ETIWANDA) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.774.2700 Fax: 909.774.2849 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Lynne B. Kennedy, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Sam Spagnolo, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director P1097 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER 1 INTRODUCTION 3 Reason for Assessment 3 Process for Annual Assessment 3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 4 Description of the Boundaries of the District 4 Description of Improvements and Services 4 Map of Improvements 5 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 7 District Budget 7 Definitions of Budget Items 9 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 9 Overview 9 General Benefit 10 Special Benefit 11 Method of Assessment Spread 11 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM 12 ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS 14 Assessment Roll 14 Annexations 14 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on June 21, 2017, the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 17-045, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed staff to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2017/18 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. Expenditures Personnel Services Operations and Maintenance Total Expenditures Budget Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection Subtotal - Taxes Other Revenues Total Revenues Budget Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance Total District EBU Count Actual Assessment per EBU Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2017/18 Fiscal Year 2017/18 Budget $ 5,730 30,830 36,560 33,840 380 34,220 720 34,940 $ (1,620) 226.22 $ 151.45 $ 151.45 1 ATTACHMENT #12 Pi 098 P1 099 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. 2. 1 have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, I certify that the Annual Engineer's Report and Assessment Diagram included herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #12 S `role INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement or facility such as paseos, community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, and providing for the growth, vigor and care of the trees and landscape plant materials. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting of landscape or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the District for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the District by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the District. • Refers to the Engineer's Report, on file with the City Clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the City Clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #12 P1101 hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including the improvements, to the zones within the District, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to, the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area known as South Etiwanda, which is south of the 1-210 Freeway along Fisher, east of East, including the south side of Highstone Manor, the south side of Smokestone, and to the San Bernardino County Flood Control drainage basin on east side. Typically parcels have been annexed to the District as they have been developed. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements maintained by the District include the paseos, community trails, trees, landscaped sites and appurtenant facilities that are throughout the District. These improvements are located within the street right-of-ways and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, the pruning, fertilizing, mowing, weeding, pest control, removal of trash/debris, and irrigation of the trees, shrubs, vines, ground cover, and turf. Maintenance of associated improvements and facilities, such as community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, includes but is not limited to, grading and replacement of trail surfacing, trail fence repair and replacement, steel fence painting, repair and replacement, and irrigation systems control, adjustment, trouble -shooting, repair and replacement. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, capital projects and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #12 P1102 repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Site # Descriptive Location SE -1 The east side of East from 480 feet south of Catalpa to 182 feet north of Catalpa. The north and south side of Catalpa from East to Brownstone. The west side of Brownstone from Catalpa to 150 feet south of Catalpa. Not including the frontage parkway at 6649 East. Ground Cover area: 10,355 square feet SE -2 SE -3 Turf area: 6,258 square feet Hardscape area: 4,050 square feet The south side of Fisher from 361 feet east of East to 210 feet east of Starstone. Ground Cover area: 9,366 square feet Hardscape area: 4,074 square feet The south side of Fisher from 860 feet west of Mulberry to Mulberry. Ground Cover area: 3,676 square feet Hardscape area: 6,910 square feet Ground cover, shrubs and turf areas that make up parkways, median islands and paseos are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company. With a Majority Protest for the Proposition 218 Ballot Initiative in September 2010, the City stopped maintaining the north side of Fisher and reduced the service level to a B. Map Of II1 DrovementS The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #12 P1 103 � � ap"p • ilf ; q9q s Ra 96 F.astAv f mH IV `•. � vim, r a� v� b y. i n CO � � a o 0 CD W CD CDz Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #12 P1104 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the District levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Fiscal Year 2017/18 Budget Expenditures Personnel Services: Regular Salaries $ 3,940 Fringe Benefits 1,790 Subtotal - Personnel 5,730 Operations and Maintenance: Operations and Maintenance: O & M/General 1,000 Contract Services: Contract Services/General 9,780 Tree Maintenance 3,720 Subtotal - Contract Services 13,500 Utilities: Water Utilities 6,050 Electric Utilities 1,520 Subtotal - Utilities 7,570 Assessment Administration 1,110 Adm in./General Overhead 7,650 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 30,830 Total Expenditures Budget $ 36,560 Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #12 P1105 Fiscal Year 2017/18 Budget Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies $ 33,840 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 380 Subtotal - Taxes 34,220 Other Revenues: Interest Earnings 720 Total Revenues Budget $ 34,940 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ (1,620) Total Gross Estimated Assessments $ 34,261.02 Total District EBU Count 226.22 Actual Assessment per EBU - Fiscal Year 2017/18 $ 151.45 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU - Fiscal Year 2017/18 $ 151.45 The maximum allowable assessment per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved when the District was formed, and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however, it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Operating Reserve Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2017 $ 61,888 Contribution to Reserve - Fiscal Year 2017/18 (1,620) Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2018 $ 60,268 Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #12 P1106 Definitions of Budaet Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time and part-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Additionally, this includes benefits available to City employees. Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District. Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Utilities: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity, water, and telephone services, as required, for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers in the District. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost of all particular departments and staff of the City, as well as consultants, for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual Engineer's Report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all central services departments of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational District within the City's administrative structure. Capital Outlay: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Other Revenues: This includes other revenues that are not levied through the annual assessments that support the District operations. These other revenues may include: interest earnings, other rental/lease income (cell site tower leases), Park Maintenance Fees, Sports Field User Group Rentals, and parking permits (Metrolink Station paid parking). METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Overview Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #12 P1 107 determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 commencing with Section 5000) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]. Section 22547 of the 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement'. Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights -of -ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. General Benefit Section 4 of Article XIII D of the California Constitution provides that once a local agency which proposes to impose assessments on property has identified those parcels that will have special benefits conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed, the local agency must next "separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred," and only the special benefits can be included in the amount of the assessments imposed. In this District, the improvements being financed consists of the maintenance of local improvements located within the boundaries of the District and include paseos, street trees, landscaped areas and appurtenant facilities that are located throughout the District and were installed to create a common landscape theme and neighborhood identity for parcels within the District. The improvements are situated within the public rights-of-way of the internal local street network within the District which provides ingress and egress for parcels within the District to Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #12 Pi 108 access the City's system of arterial streets. City residents and traffic from parcels not within the District do not use the internal local street network or paseos except for the express purpose of accessing properties located within the District, and therefore do not benefit from the improvements. Only parcels which are within the District and proximate to the improvements and within the District are being assessed. Accordingly, there is a direct physical and visual nexus between each parcel being assessed and the improvements to be funded by the assessment that does not exist for parcels outside of the District boundary and that is particular and distinct from that shared by the public at large. Under these circumstances, all of the benefits conferred are direct and local in nature, and provide a benefit to only those parcels located within the boundaries of the District. Based upon this, it has been determined that there is no quantifiable general benefit to the surrounding community and the public in general from the maintenance of the improvements within the boundaries of the District, and therefore no portion of the project costs should be attributed to general benefit. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District and, as such, confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District, only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements is identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The EBU method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one EBU. Every other land -use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #12 P1109 development (land -use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land -use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land -Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Property Type (County Use Code) EBU Value Multiplier Single Family Residential 1.00 Parcel Non -Residential 2.00 Acre The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2017/18 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the San Bernardino County Assessor Office, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #12 Maximum Allowable Actual Assessment Asessment Rate Total Property Type County Use Code Rate per EBU per EBU Units/Acres Total EBUs Single Family Residential $151.451 $151.451 199.001 199.00 Non -Residential 1 151.45 151.45 13.61 27.22 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the San Bernardino County Assessor Office, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #12 P111O D S rn :0 W Grove Av ,_.._.._..,._... Vineyard Av rn s Hellman Av r Archibald Av Hermosa A. i Haven Av! Milliken Av Rochester Av € .T Etiwanda Av 52 East Av 16 r- 0 a FiT W v 3 fD CL D o a ca M W r W a Cherry Av v m A :r N m a Rochester Av .......... ��Day Creek Etiwanda Av D Carnelian St I Hellman Av Archibald Av Hermosa Av Haven Av Milliken Av n » tD w� W Rio 1► n 00 Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #12 P1111 ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2017/18 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2017/18 actual assessments for the District: Pro ertT e (County Use Code Actual Assessment Rate per EBU Total Units/Acres Total EBUs Total Assessment Single Family Residential $151.45 199.00 199.00 $30,138.55 Non -Residential 151.451 13.611 27.221 4,122.47 Totals 1 1 212.61 226.22 $34,261.02 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations The following annexations are effective for Fiscal Year 2017/18: Apn Annexation Date Project Name Total Units/ Acres Total EBUs Property Type 0227-071-17 09/07/2016 TR19968 11.00 11.00 Single Family Residential Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #12 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2017/18 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 (Lower Etiwanda) P1112 444, ch►vt e -# 13 P1113 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 9 (LOWER ETIWANDA) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2700 Fax: 909.477.2849 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Lynne B. Kennedy, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Sam Spagnolo, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director P1114 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER 1 INTRODUCTION 3 Reason for Assessment 3 Process for Annual Assessment 3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 4 Description of the Boundaries of the District 4 Description of Improvements and Services 4 Map of Improvements 7 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 9 District Budget 9 Definitions of Budget Items 11 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 12 Overview 12 General Benefit 12 Special Benefit 13 Method of Assessment Spread 13 Cost of Living Inflator 14 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM 15 ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS 17 Assessment Roll 17 Annexations 17 P1115 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on June 21, 2017, the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 17-045, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 (Lower Etiwanda) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed staff to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2017/18 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. Fiscal Year 2017/18 Budget Expenditures Personnel Services $ 324,710 Operations and Maintenance 311,140 Capital Expenditures 24,400 Total Expenditures Budget 660,250 Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies 300,150 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 1,380 Subtotal - Taxes 301,530 Other Revenues 20,320 Total Revenues Budget 321,850 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ (338,400) Total District EBU Count 2,165.56 Actual Assessment per EBU $ 140.00 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU $ 556.23 Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #13 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. 2. 1 have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, I certify that the Annual Engineer's Report and Assessment Diagram included herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #13 P1117 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement or facility such as paseos, community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, and providing for the growth, vigor and care of the trees and landscape plant materials. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting of landscape or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the District for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the District by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the District. • Refers to the Engineer's Report, on file with the City Clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the City Clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #13 P1118 hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including the improvements, to the zones within the District, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to, the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area known as Lower Etiwanda, which is south of Victoria, north of Foothill, generally east of Etiwanda and the 1-15 Freeway and west of East. Typically parcels have been annexed to the District as they have developed. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements maintained by the District include the paseos, community trails, trees, landscaped sites and appurtenant facilities that are throughout the District. These improvements are located within the street right-of-ways and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, the pruning, fertilizing, mowing, weeding, pest control, removal of trash/debris, and irrigation of the trees, shrubs, vines, ground cover, and turf. Maintenance of associated improvements and facilities, such as community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, includes but is not limited to, grading and replacement of trail surfacing, trail fence repair and replacement, steel fence painting, repair and replacement, and irrigation systems control, adjustment, trouble -shooting, repair and replacement. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, capital projects and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #13 S ``Fs: addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Parks: Garcia Park (formerly known as South Etiwanda Park). Site # Descriptive Location 9-1 The west side of East from 380 feet north of Chateau to 290 feet south of Chateau. Ground Cover area: 7,244 square feet Hardscape area: 7,525 square feet 9-2 The west side of East from 339 feet north of Brookfield to 157 north of Brookfield. Brookfield from East to Oak Crest. The east side of Oak Crest to 137 feet north of Brookfield. Ground Cover area: 2,390 square feet Hardscape area: 6,874 square feet 9-3 The west side of East from 790 feet north of Highfield to 256 feet south of Highfield. Ground Cover area: 8,769 square feet Hardscape area: 10,669 square feet 9-4 The west side of East From 295 feet north of Via Veneto To Via Veneto. The north side of Via Veneto From East to Dolcetto. The east side of Dolcetto from Via Veneto to Miller. The south side of Miller from 372 feet west of Dolcetto to 240 feet east of Dolcetto. The west side of Dolcetto from Miller to Garcia. The north side of Garcia from Dolcetto to Etiwanda. Ground Cover area: 48,612 square feet 9-5 W. Hardscape area: 28,746 square feet The north side of Miller from 429 feet west of Dolcetto to 1029 feet west of Dolcetto. Ground Cover area: 6,519 square feet Hardscape area: 3,325 square feet The north side of Miller from 254 feet east of Dolcetto to 167 feet west of Dolcetto. Ground Cover area: 4,089 square feet Hardscape area: 2,854 square feet 9-8 The south side of Base Line from Etiwanda Ave. to Shelby. The Base Line median form Etiwanda to 473 feet east of Shelby. Ground Cover area: 16,395 square feet Hardscape area: 14,558 square feet 9-9 The north side of Candlewood from Exbury to Etiwanda. Ground Cover area: 3,362 square feet Hardscape area: 786 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #13 P1 120 9-10 The north side of Base Line form 522 feet east of Forester to 180 feet west of Forester. The Base Line median form 503 feet east of Forester to 200 feet west of Forester. Ground Cover area: 16,930 square feet Hardscape area: 13,600 square feet 9-11 The north side of Mueller from 40 feet past the east end of Mueller to 20 feet east of Dicarlo. Ground Cover area: 9,420 square feet Hardscape area: 742 square feet 9-12 The north and south sides of Highland from 217 feet west of Norcia to 210 feet east of Dicarlo. Ground Cover area: 12,471 square feet Hardscape area: 14,445 square feet 9-13 The south side of Carnesi from Etiwanda to 395 feet east of Murietta. Ground Cover area: 8,919 square feet Hardscape area: 6,203 square feet 9-14 The west side of East from 665 feet north of Miller to Miller. The north side of Miller from East to 667 feet west of East. Ground Cover area: 9,150 square feet Hardscape area: 16,226 square feet 9-15 The north side of Base Line from Shelby to 343 feet east of Shelby. Ground Cover area: 3,480 square feet Hardscape area: 4,638 square feet 9-16 The east side of Dolcetto from Garcia to Via Veneto. The south side of Via Veneto from Dolcetto to East. The west side of East from Via Veneto to 276 feet south of Via Veneto. Ground Cover area: 16,310 square feet Hardscape area: 13,411 square feet 9-17 The east side of Etiwanda from 145 feet south of Miller to Miller. The south side of Miller from Etiwanda to Three Vines. Ground Cover area: 7,535 square feet Hardscape area: 6,130 square feet FH -17 The Foothill median from Etiwanda to Cornwell. Ground Cover area: 8,275 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #13 P1121 Ground cover, shrubs and turf areas that make up parkways, median islands and paseos are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company. Parks are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crews. Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #13 P1122 i H ochesterAv 0 4 o its .} U) N T 3 13 Day Creek BI - } f .......... I I r- i a j n Etiwanda,Av 'a w r r j� I N � �• v � O� 13 ,1 Ir cmc a • _A- Ir�� EastAv n �o fD - W y� 4 A ti io ■ cD -a � •`•� m m d CL 0 0 V) ':CD -p CD W Z Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #13 P1123 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the District levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Capital Expenditures: Captial Outlay - Equipment 9,400 Captial Outlay - Improvements Other Than Building 15,000 Subtotal - Capital Expenditures 24,400 Total Expenditures Budget $ 660,250 Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #13 Fiscal Year 2017/18 Budget Expenditures Personnel Services: Regular Salaries $ 204,090 Part-time Salaries 21,200 Fringe Benefits 99,420 Subtotal - Personnel 324,710 Operations and Maintenance: Operations and Maintenance: O & M/General 29,860 Cellular Technology 1,370 Emergency Equipment and Vehicle Rental 1,200 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 32,430 Contract Services: Contract Services/General 123,030 Tree Maintenance 32,630 Subtotal - Contract Services 155,660 Utilities: Water Utilities 51,140 Electric Utilities 10,120 Subtotal - Utilities 61,260 Assessment Administration 8,010 Admin./General Overhead 53,780 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 311,140 Capital Expenditures: Captial Outlay - Equipment 9,400 Captial Outlay - Improvements Other Than Building 15,000 Subtotal - Capital Expenditures 24,400 Total Expenditures Budget $ 660,250 Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #13 P1124 Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection Subtotal - Taxes Other Revenues: Interest Earnings Park Maintenance Fees Sports Field User Group Rentals Subtotal - Other Revenues: Fiscal Year 2017/18 Budget $ 300,150 1,380 301,530 17,820 2,000 500 20,320 Total Revenues Budget $ 321,850 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ (338,400) Total Gross Estimated Assessments $ 303,178.40 Total District EBU Count 2,165.56 Actual Assessment per EBU - Fiscal Year 2017/18 $ 140.00 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU - Fiscal Year 2017/18 $ 556.23 Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however, it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Operating Reserve Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2017 $1,469,816 Contribution to Reserve - Fiscal Year 2017/18 (338,400) Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2018 $1,131,416 Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #13 P1125 The City has reserve funds that are more than sufficient to cover an estimated six months' worth of maintenance and servicing costs for the District. When there are excess funds in the District's reserve account, the excess can be used to lower the annual levy to property owners within the District. The City will continue to annually review the estimated costs and expenses for the District as well as reserve fund levels, in order to determine if future levies can be reduced as well. Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time and part-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Additionally, this includes benefits available to City employees. Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District. Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Utilities: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity, water, and telephone services, as required, for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers in the District. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost of all particular departments and staff of the City, as well as consultants, for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual Engineer's Report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all central services departments of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational District within the City's administrative structure. Capital Outlay: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Other Revenues: This includes other revenues that are not levied through the annual assessments that support the District operations. These other revenues may include: interest earnings, other rental/lease income (cell site tower leases), Park Maintenance Fees, Sports Field User Group Rentals, and parking permits (Metrolink Station paid parking). Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #13 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Overview Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D. all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 commencing with Section 5000) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]. Section 22547 of the 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement". Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights -of -ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. General Benefit Section 4 of Article XIII D of the California Constitution provides that once a local agency which proposes to impose assessments on property has identified those parcels that will have special benefits conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed, the local agency must next "separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred," and only the special benefits can be included in the amount of the assessments imposed. Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #13 P1127 In this District, the improvements being financed consists of the maintenance of local improvements located within the boundaries of the District and include paseos, street trees, landscaped areas and appurtenant facilities that are located throughout the District and were installed to create a common landscape theme and neighborhood identity for parcels within the District. The improvements are situated within the public rights-of-way of the internal local street network within the District which provides ingress and egress for parcels within the District to access the City's system of arterial streets. City residents and traffic from parcels not within the District do not use the internal local street network or paseos except for the express purpose of accessing properties located within the District, and therefore do not benefit from the improvements. Only parcels which are within the District and proximate to the improvements and within the Assessment District are being assessed. Accordingly, there is a direct physical and visual nexus between each parcel being assessed and the improvements to be funded by the assessment that does not exist for parcels outside of the District boundary and that is particular and distinct from that shared by the public at large. Under these circumstances, all of the benefits conferred are direct and local in nature, and provide a benefit to only those parcels located within the boundaries of the District. Based upon this, it has been determined that there is no quantifiable general benefit to the surrounding community and the public in general from the maintenance of the improvements within the boundaries of the District, and therefore no portion of the project costs should be attributed to general benefit. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District and, as such, confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District, only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements is identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #13 P1128 To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The EBU method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one EBU. Every other land -use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land -use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land -use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land -Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Property Type (County Use Code) EBU Value Multiplier Single Family Residential 1.00 Parcel Multi -Family Residential 1.00 Unit Non -Residential 2.00 Acre The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following summarizes the Fiscal Year 2017/18 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Cost of Living Inflator Each fiscal year beginning with Fiscal Year 2001/02, the maximum allowable assessment may be increased each year, based upon the Consumer Price Index ("CPI"), All Urban Consumers, for the Los Angeles -Anaheim -San Bernardino Area, as determined by the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, or its successor. The Engineer shall compute Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #13 Maximum Allowable Actual Assessment Asessment Rate Total Property Type (County Use Code Rate per EBU per EBU Units/Acres Total EBUs Single Family Residential $566.23 $140.00 1,072.00 1,072.00 Multi -Family Residential 566.23 140.00 1,057.00 1,057.00 Non -Residential 566.23 140.00 18.28 36.56 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Cost of Living Inflator Each fiscal year beginning with Fiscal Year 2001/02, the maximum allowable assessment may be increased each year, based upon the Consumer Price Index ("CPI"), All Urban Consumers, for the Los Angeles -Anaheim -San Bernardino Area, as determined by the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, or its successor. The Engineer shall compute Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #13 S `P4:'. the percentage difference between the CPI for March of each year and the CPI for the previous March, and shall then adjust the existing assessment by an amount not to exceed such percentage for the following fiscal year. Should the Bureau of Labor Statistics revise such index or discontinue the preparation of such index, the Engineer shall use the revised index or a comparable system as approved by the City Council for determining fluctuations in the cost of living. If for any reason the percentage change is negative the maximum allowable assessment would not be decreased by reason of such negative percentage change and would remain at the amount as computed on the previous fiscal year regardless of any CPI adjustment. The annual assessment cannot exceed the actual costs to operate the District in any given year. If operating costs are such that the maximum assessment amount is not needed, the City would levy only what is needed for that year. The Fiscal Year 2017/18 actual assessment rate has been increased due to the district's shrinking fund balance. The goal of the City is to ensure that the district has a reserve fund balance equal to one year's district expenditures. The City will continue to annually review the estimated costs and expenses for the District as well as reserve fund levels, in order to determine if future levies can be reduced as well. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the San Bernardino County Assessor Office, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #13 P1 130 �it° ai9a�7; n 3a ? � g'!° s HYia v 3 351. °i}: �5��m oo � aji: z D o mN a co W CU s Grove Av =-••-••---•-••�..r- Q ..._..J ' • j 9 Carnelian St Vineyard Av j s Hellman Av N Hellman Av r j Archibald Avl Archibald Av I Hermosa Av j Hermosa Av i Haven Avi Haven Av Milliken Av 1 _,_.-..-.._.._.a Milliken Av I i j r...0 Rochester Av Rochester Av ~ i. ............ ._.� ...� .Z Day Creek B� � y Etiwanda Av L__ Etiwanda Av �1 SO East Av�•_•,_,.-••- D 0 g W o ;0 W r tD 17- Cherry Av U1• r 0 3 J r J Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 16 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #13 P1131 ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2017/18 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2017/18 actual assessments for the District: Property Type (County Use Code) Actual Assessment Rate per EBU Total Units/Acres Total EBUs Total Assessment Single Family Residential $140.00 1,072.00 1,072.00 $150,080.00 Milti-Family Residential 140.00 1,057.001 1,057.001 147,980.00 Non -Residential 140.00 18.281 36.561 $5,118.40 Totals 2,147.281 2,165.561 $303,178.40 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations The following annexations are effective for Fiscal Year 2017/18: Annexation Total Units/ Apn Date Project Name Acres Total EBUs Property Type 0227-061-03 & 82 08/03/2016 TR18936 16.00 16.00 Single Family Residential 1100-011-02 09/07/2016 TR18966 7.00 7.00 Single Family Residential Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 17 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #13 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2017/18 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 (Rancho Etiwanda) P1132 A#vt-hnien-4 14 P1133 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 10 (RANCHO ETIWANDA) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2700 Fax: 909.477.2849 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Lynne B. Kennedy, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Sam Spagnolo, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director P1134 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Process for Annual Assessment PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS Description of the Boundaries of the District Description of Improvements and Services Map of Improvements ESTIMATE OF COSTS District Budget Definitions of Budget Items METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Overview General Benefit Special Benefit Method of Assessment Spread Cost of Living Inflator ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ASSESSMENT ROLL and ANNEXATIONS Assessment Roll 1 3 3 3 4 4 4 7 9 9 11 12 12 12 13 13 14 15 17 17 Annexations 17 P1135 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on June 21, 2017, the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 17-045, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 (Rancho Etiwanda) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed staff to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2017/18 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. Fiscal Year 2017/18 Budget Expenditures Personnel Services $ 272,100 Operations and Maintenance 338,280 Capital Expenditures 3,600 Total Expenditures Budget 613,980 Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies 549,620 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 6,750 Subtotal - Taxes 556,370 Other Revenues 36,110 Total Revenues Budget 592,480 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ (21,500) Total District EBU Count 786.00 Actual Assessment per EBU $ 711.71 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU $ 871.33 Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #14 P1136 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. 2. 1 have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, I certify that the Annual Engineer's Report and Assessment Diagram included herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #14 P1137 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement or facility such as paseos, community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, and providing for the growth, vigor and care of the trees and landscape plant materials. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting of landscape or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the District for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the District by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the District. • Refers to the Engineer's Report, on file with the City Clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the City Clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #14 P1138 hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including the improvements, to the zones within the District, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to, the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area known as Rancho Etiwanda, which lies north of the 210 Freeway, east of Day Creek Channel, and west of Hanley. Typically parcels have been annexed to the District as they have developed. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements maintained by the District include the paseos, community trails, trees, landscaped sites and appurtenant facilities that are throughout the District. These improvements are located within the street right-of-ways and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, the pruning, fertilizing, mowing, weeding, pest control, removal of trash/debris, and irrigation of the trees, shrubs, vines, ground cover, and turf. Maintenance of associated improvements and facilities, such as community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, includes but is not limited to, grading and replacement of trail surfacing, trail fence repair and replacement, steel fence painting, repair and replacement, and irrigation systems control, adjustment, trouble -shooting, repair and replacement. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, capital projects and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #14 P1139 addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Parks: Day Creek Park. Site # Descriptive Location 10-1 The west side of Day Creek from 790 feet north of Richfield to Wilson. The north side of Wilson from Day Creek to 227 feet west of Day Creek. This site overlaps 10-2. Ground Cover area: 16,941 square feet Hardscape area: 3,589 square feet 10-2 The north and south side of Wilson from 497 feet west of Alvarado to Day Creek. The south side of Wilson from Day Creek to Bluegrass. The Wilson median from Day Creek to Bluegrass. Ground Cover area: 47,275 square feet Hardscape area: 6,444 square feet 10-3 The west side of Day Creek from Wilson to 144 feet south of Clydesdale. The Day Creek median from Wilson to Banyan. Ground Cover area: 32,619 square feet 10-4 10-5 Hardscape area: 10,983 square feet The east side of Day Creek from 648 feet south of Keenland to Wilson. Ground Cover area: 15,952 square feet Hardscape area: 4,365 square feet The west side of Bluegrass from Wilson to 705 feet south of Challendon. Ground Cover area: 26,882 square feet Hardscape area: 12,220 square feet 10-6 The south side of Banyan from Rochester to Day Creek. The north side of Banyan from 427 feet west of Rocking Horse to Rocking Horse. The west side of Day Creek from Banyan to Vintage. The north side of Vintage from Day Creek to Paseo ending 153 feet west of Sand Hill. Ground Cover area: 44,000 square feet Hardscape area: 16,197 square feet 10-7 The north side of Vintage from 180 feet east of Taylor Canon Place to Day Creek. The east side of Day Creek from Vintage to Banyan. The south side of Banyan from Day Creek to Bluegrass. Ground Cover area: 22,164 square feet Hardscape area: 11,724 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #14 P1140 10-8 The landscape against the south side facing wall north of the 210 freeway from the top of the slope on the east side of Day Creek to 300 feet eastward. The Day Creek median from the 210 freeway to Vintage. The east side of Day Creek from Caltrans ROW to Vintage. The south side of Vintage from Day Creek to 180 feet east of Taylor Canyon. Ground Cover area: 16,841 square feet Hardscape area: 7,025 square feet 10-9 The north side of Coyote from Brookstone to Day Creek. The east side of Day Creek from Coyote to 358 feet north of Coyote. The west side of Day Creek from 118 feet north of Coyote to 380 feet north of Coyote. Ground Cover area: 9,403 square feet Hardscape area: 6,052 square feet 10-10 The north side of Wilson from 395 feet east of Day Creek to Day Creek. The east side of Day Creek from Wilson to Blackstone. The south side of Blackstone from Day Creek to Stoneview. The north side of Blackstone from Day Creek to 165 feet west of Stoneview. Ground Cover area: 26,304 square feet Hardscape area: 19,117 square feet 10-11 The west side of Day Creek from 340 feet north of Banyan to Banyan. The north side of Banyan from Day Creek to Rocking Horse. Ground Cover area: 20,378 square feet Hardscape area: 11,212 square feet 10-12 The paseo on the east side of Stoneview across from Duncaster. Ground Cover area: 3,326 square feet Hardscape area: 2,374 square feet 10-13 The west side of Day Creek from 340 feet south of Vintage to 915 feet south of Vintage. Ground Cover area: 27,416 square feet Hardscape area: 16,167 square feet 10-14 The south side of Vintage from Saddle Tree to Day Creek. The west side of Day Creek from Vintage to 325 feet south of Vintage. Ground Cover area: 7,777 square feet Hardscape area: 8,101 square feet *This sites irrigation pump and valves are powered from site 10-13 Ground cover, shrubs and turf areas that make up parkways, median islands and paseos are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company. Parks are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crews. Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #14 P1141 Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #14 P1142 Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #14 }�liIt , 3�a• 1 nw NU119 ' ,.'S 1 Rochester Av 1 I n j78 o .�i O- 1 �-�1 • N J J V i CD 4 o� N � v W' q n O Etiwanda Av o �� I ■ to CD n 3. o �. z a _ 0 0 r � � c U) Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #14 P1143 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the District levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Operations and Maintenance: Operations and Maintenance: O & M/General O & M/Facilities Emergency Equipment and Vehicle Rental Equipment Operations and Maintenance Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance Contract Services: Contract Services/General Contract Services/Facilities Tree Maintenance Subtotal - Contract Services Utilities: Water Utilities Electric Utilities Subtotal - Utilities Assessment Administration Adm in./General Overhead Other Expenses Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance Capital Expenditures: Captial Outlay - Equipment Total Expenditures Budget 18,750 1,500 1,900 500 22,650 111,540 3,950 10,500 125,990 95,470 21,200 116,670 4,330 67,990 650 338,280 3,600. $ 613,980 Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #14 Fiscal Year 2017/18 Budget Expenditures Personnel Services: Regular Salaries $ 159,600 Overtime Salaries 1,050 Part-time Salaries 31,110 Fringe Benefits 80,340 Subtotal - Personnel 272,100 Operations and Maintenance: Operations and Maintenance: O & M/General O & M/Facilities Emergency Equipment and Vehicle Rental Equipment Operations and Maintenance Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance Contract Services: Contract Services/General Contract Services/Facilities Tree Maintenance Subtotal - Contract Services Utilities: Water Utilities Electric Utilities Subtotal - Utilities Assessment Administration Adm in./General Overhead Other Expenses Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance Capital Expenditures: Captial Outlay - Equipment Total Expenditures Budget 18,750 1,500 1,900 500 22,650 111,540 3,950 10,500 125,990 95,470 21,200 116,670 4,330 67,990 650 338,280 3,600. $ 613,980 Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #14 P1144 Fiscal Year 2017/18 Budget Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies $ 549,620 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 6,750 Subtotal - Taxes 556,370 Other Revenues: Interest Earnings 11,340 Other Rental/Lease Income 7,500 Park Maintenance Fees 4,740 Sports Field User Group Rentals 2,000 Sports Lighting Fees 7,030 Other Revenue 3,500 Subtotal - Other Revenues: 36,110 Total Revenues Budget $ 592,480 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ (21,500) Total Gross Estimated Assessments $ 559,404.06 Total District EBU Count 786.00 Actual Assessment per EBU - Fiscal Year 2017/18 $ 711.71 Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however, it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Operating Reserve Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2017 $1,078,724 Contribution to Reserve - Fiscal Year 2017/18 (21,500) Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2018 $ 1,057,224 Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #14 P1145 Definitions of Budaet Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time and part-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Additionally, this includes benefits available to City employees. Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District. Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Utilities: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity, water, and telephone services, as required, for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers in the District. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost of all particular departments and staff of the City, as well as consultants, for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual Engineer's Report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all central services departments of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational District within the City's administrative structure. Capital Outlay: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Other Revenues: This includes other revenues that are not levied through the annual assessments that support the District operations. These other revenues may include: interest earnings, other rental/lease income (cell site tower leases), Park Maintenance Fees, Sports Field User Group Rentals, and parking permits (Metrolink Station paid parking). Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #14 aIElI:1 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Overview Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D. all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 commencing with Section 5000) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]. Section 22547 of the 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement". Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights -of -ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. General Benefit Section 4 of Article XIII D of the California Constitution provides that once a local agency which proposes to impose assessments on property has identified those parcels that will have special benefits conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed, the local agency must next "separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred," and only the special benefits can be included in the amount of the assessments imposed. Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #14 P1147 In this District, the improvements being financed consists of the maintenance of local improvements located within the boundaries of the District and include paseos, street trees, landscaped areas and appurtenant facilities that are located throughout the District and were installed to create a common landscape theme and neighborhood identity for parcels within the District. The improvements are situated within the public rights-of-way of the internal local street network within the District which provides ingress and egress for parcels within the District to access the City's system of arterial streets. City residents and traffic from parcels not within the District do not use the internal local street network or paseos except for the express purpose of accessing properties located within the District, and therefore do not benefit from the improvements. Only parcels which are within the District and proximate to the improvements and within the District are being assessed. Accordingly, there is a direct physical and visual nexus between each parcel being assessed and the improvements to be funded by the assessment that does not exist for parcels outside of the District boundary and that is particular and distinct from that shared by the public at large. Under these circumstances, all of the benefits conferred are direct and local in nature, and provide a benefit to only those parcels located within the boundaries of the District. Based upon this, it has been determined that there is no quantifiable general benefit to the surrounding community and the public in general from the maintenance of the improvements within the boundaries of the District, and therefore no portion of the project costs should be attributed to general benefit. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District and, as such, confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District, only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements is identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #14 P1148 To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The EBU method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one EBU. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land -Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Property Type (County Use Code) EBU Value Multiplier Single Family Residential 1.00 Parcel The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following summarizes the Fiscal Year 2017/18 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Cost of Livin_a Inflator Each fiscal year beginning with Fiscal Year 2002/03, the maximum allowable assessment may increase each year, based upon the Consumer Price Index ("CPI"), All Urban Consumers, for the Los Angeles -Anaheim -San Bernardino Area, as determined by the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, or its successor. The Engineer shall compute the percentage difference between the CPI for March of each year and the CPI for the previous March, and shall then adjust the existing assessment by an amount not to exceed such percentage for the following fiscal year. Should the Bureau of Labor Statistics revise such index or discontinue the preparation of such index, the Engineer shall use the revised index or a comparable system as approved by the City Council for determining fluctuations in the cost of living. If for any reason the percentage change is negative the maximum allowable assessment would not be decreased by reason of such negative percentage change and would remain at the amount as computed on the previous fiscal year regardless of any CPI adjustment. The Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #14 Maximum Allowable Actual Assessment Asessment Rate Total Property Type (County Use Code Rate per EBU per EBU Units/Acres Total EBUs Single Family Residential $871.331 $711.71 786.001 786.00 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Cost of Livin_a Inflator Each fiscal year beginning with Fiscal Year 2002/03, the maximum allowable assessment may increase each year, based upon the Consumer Price Index ("CPI"), All Urban Consumers, for the Los Angeles -Anaheim -San Bernardino Area, as determined by the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, or its successor. The Engineer shall compute the percentage difference between the CPI for March of each year and the CPI for the previous March, and shall then adjust the existing assessment by an amount not to exceed such percentage for the following fiscal year. Should the Bureau of Labor Statistics revise such index or discontinue the preparation of such index, the Engineer shall use the revised index or a comparable system as approved by the City Council for determining fluctuations in the cost of living. If for any reason the percentage change is negative the maximum allowable assessment would not be decreased by reason of such negative percentage change and would remain at the amount as computed on the previous fiscal year regardless of any CPI adjustment. The Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #14 annual assessment cannot exceed the actual costs to operate the District in any given year. If operating costs are such that the maximum assessment amount is not needed, the City would levy only what is needed for that year. The actual assessment rate for Fiscal Year 2017/18 will remain at $711.71 per single-family residence. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the San Bernardino County Assessor Office, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #14 P1150 a!� aia�s_i s as ea $ a' 4`4 o nNWi v) a a7ai9B! cn W = CD � Gr a AVif ;—••-----•—••�._r— r.._..� Carnelian St Vineyard AV i ;Cn 'iellman AV Hellman AV Archibald Av j Archibald AV Hermosa AV e j Hermosa AV Haven Av! Haven AV s j Milliken AV .—..—°._.._.°_.J Milliken AV j Rochester AV Rochester AV Day C eek 1311 y a n Etiwanda AV LEtiwanda AV i (D Ln East AV (_,_,•_„�, D m -• °o 00 N CD (D IOU r >� N o O� Cherry AV • = �' v t3. f D r w1. N O Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 16 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #14 P1151 ASSESSMENT ROLL and ANNEXATIONS Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2017/18 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2017/18 actual assessment for the District: Actual Assessment Total Property Type (County Use Code) Rate per EBU Units/Acres Total EBUs Total Assessment Single Family Residential $711.71 786.00 786.00 $559,404.06 Totals 786.001 786.001 $559,404.06 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations There were no annexations for Fiscal Year 2017/18. Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 17 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #14 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2017/18 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterials) P1152 A-#achm,enf # 6 P1153 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. (ARTERIALS) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2700 Fax: 909.477.2849 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Lynne B. Kennedy, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Sam Spagnolo, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director P1154 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER 1 INTRODUCTION 3 Reason for Assessment 3 Process for Annual Assessment 3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 4 Description of the Boundaries of the District 4 Description of Improvements and Services 4 Map of Improvements 4 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 6 District Budget 6 Definitions of Budget Items 8 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 8 Overview 8 Special Benefit 9 General Benefit 10 Method of Assessment Spread 10 ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS 13 Assessment Roll 13 Annexations 13 P1155 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on June 21, 2017, the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 17-048, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed the City Engineer to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2017/18 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay for the acquisition of street lights, the installation of Light Emitting Diode (LED) street lighting, and estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. Fiscal Year 2017/18 Budget Expenditures Personnel Services $ 20,740 Operations and Maintenance 796,700 Capital Expenditures 4,255,000 Debt Service 213,820 Total Expenditures Budget 5,286,260 Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies 805,570 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 6,750 Subtotal - Taxes 812,320 Other Revenues 3,380 Advances from Capital Reserve Fund 4,216,730 Total Revenues Budget 5,032,430 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ (253,830) Total District EBU Count 45,790.72 Actual Assessment per EBU $ 17.77 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU $ 17.77 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #15 P1156 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. 2. 1 have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirely of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, I certify that the Annual Engineer's Report and Assessment Diagram included herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #15 P1157 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements, the installation of LED street lighting, and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the District for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the District by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the District. • Refers to the Engineer's Report, on file with the City Clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the City Clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #15 P1158 During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including the improvements, to the zones within the District, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing, must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to, the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Descrivtion of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as the entire City of Rancho Cucamonga. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of street lights, traffic signals and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The maintenance and servicing includes, but is not limited to, furnishing electric current for public lighting facilities including street lights and traffic signals, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in operational and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, in order to lower expenses of the District. Beginning in Fiscal Year 2017/18, the acquisition by the City of the street lights and installation of LED street lighting specially benefiting the properties within the District is proposed to be added to the improvements. Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of street light and traffic signal improvements to be maintained using District funds. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #15 � m Grove Av . . L Vineyard Av o, g 3 3 Hellman Av • me A rchibald Av • • Hermosa Av Haven Av Mili ken Rochester ••• iM � i1N • • Etiwanda Av .� g � • East Av 3 � Cherry Av P1159 n� m Qr t Le a • esel j •tom Camellan St •N Hallman Ave CO•r vJ e`A so Archibald Av 9 Hermosa Av f —4000100 Haven Av i �• - Mlliken Av . d b k BI �. E r East Av I < x-0-3 Z Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #15 (D to S�1 tD v rn r r_ � 4 N ((D 3 � Cherry Av P1159 n� m Qr t Le a • esel j •tom Camellan St •N Hallman Ave CO•r vJ e`A so Archibald Av 9 Hermosa Av f —4000100 Haven Av i �• - Mlliken Av . d b k BI �. E r East Av I < x-0-3 Z Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #15 P1160 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the District levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Personnel Services: Regular Salaries $ 14,110 Fringe Benefits 6,630 Subtotal - Personnel 20,740 Operations and Maintenance: Operations and Maintenance: Training 180 Membership Dues 50 O & M/General 7,990 Cellular Technology 1,000 Equipment Operations and Maintenance 500 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 9,720 Utilities: Telephone Utilities 1,500 Electric Utilities 574,120 Subtotal - Utilities 575,620 Assessment Administration 160,890 Admin./General Overhead 50,470 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 796,700 Capital Expenditures: Captial Project 4,255,000 Debt Service: Interest Expense 34,870 Principal Repayments 178,950 Subtotal - Debt Service 213,820 Total Expenditures Budget $ 5,286,260 f Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #15 P1161 Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection Subtotal - Taxes Other Revenues: Interest Earnings Developer Energizing Fee Subtotal - Other Revenues: Advances from Capital Reserve Fund Fiscal Year 2017/18 Budget $ 805,570 6,750 812,320 2,380 1,000 3,380 4,216,730 Total Revenues Budget $ 5,032,430 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ (253,830) Total Gross Estimated Assessments $ 813,701.16 Total District EBU Count 45,790.72 Actual Assessment per EBU - Fiscal Year 2017/18 $ 17.77 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU - Fiscal Year 2017/18 $ 17.77 The maximum allowable assessment per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in Fiscal Year 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the total amount of funds needed to maintain the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Operating Reserve Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2017 $ 280,734 Contribution to Reserve - Fiscal Year 2017/18 (253,830) Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2018 $ 26,904 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #15 P1162 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time and part-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Additionally, this includes benefits available to City employees. Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District. Utilities: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity and telephone services, as required, for the operation and maintenance of the street lights, traffic signals, and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual Engineer's Report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all central services departments of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational District within the City's administrative structure. Capital Outlay: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include installation of safety lights and other large improvements. Debt Service: This item includes the repayment of interest and principal to the City Capital Reserve Fund for the acquisition of street lights and installation of LED street lighting within the District. Other Revenues: This includes other revenues that are not levied through the annual assessments that support the District operations. These other revenues may include: interest earnings and Developer Energizing Fees. METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Overview Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #15 P1163 improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the public lighting facilities, including traffic signals. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 commencing with Section 5000) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]. Section 22547 of the 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement". Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights -of -ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, safety, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and • providing for safe vehicular and pedestrian access for properties within the District, and • providing beautification and overall enhancement to properties within the District. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #15 P1164 The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the safety and visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District However, it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined; however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since Fiscal Year 1996/97. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit ("EBU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU). Every other land -use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land -use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land - use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #15 P1165 Land -Use Equivalent Benefit Units Property Type (County Use Code) EBU Value Multiplier Single Family Residential 1.00 Parcel Multi -Family Residential 1.00 Unit Non -Residential 2.00 Acre The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2017/18 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the street lights and traffic signals is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #15 Maximum Allowable Actual Assessment Asessment Total Property Type (County Use Code) Rate per EBU Rate per EBU Units/Acres Total EBUs Single Family Residential $17.77 $17.77 27,853.00 27,853.00 Multi -Family Residential 17.77 17.77 11,559.00 11,559.00 Non -Residential 17.77 17.77 3,147.27 6,294.54 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the street lights and traffic signals is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #15 Vineyard AV A F. Hellman AV Archibald AV Hermosa AV Haven AV Milliken AV Rochester AV Etiwanda AV s SO East AV M N nNWi W 7 W CD CL D a y a C Q Cherry AV wo Rochester AV flay Creek E Elw.°artda Av C s Carnelian St I Hellman AV Archibald AV Hermosa AV Haven AV Milliken AV Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #15 P1166 P1167 ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2017/18 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following table summarize the Fiscal Year 2017/18 actual assessments for the District: Property Type (County Use Code) Actual Assessment Rate per EBU Total Units/Acres Total EBUs Total Assessment Single Family Residential $17.77 27,856.00 27,856.00 $495,001.12 Multi-FamilyResidential 17.77 11,559.00 11,559.00 205,403.43 Non -Residential 17.77 3,187.86 6,375.72 113,296.61 Totals 2.40 42,602.86 45,790.72 $813,701.16 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations The following Annexations are effective for Fiscal Year 2017/18: Apn Annexation Date Project Name Total Units/ Acres Total EBUs Property Type 1089-011-04 03/16/2016 TR18508 31.00 31.00 Single Family Residential 0229-341-03 07/06/2016 DRC2015-00650 2.16 2.16 Non -Residential 0229-341-15 07/20/2016 DRC2015-00402 2.40 2.40 Non -Residential 0208-353-14 07/20/2016 PM19666 2.22 2.22 Non -Residential 1061-611-15 08/03/2016 DRC2010-00893 1.00 1.00 Single Family Residential 0227-061-03 & 82 08/03/2016 TR18936 16.00 16.00 Single Family Residential 0227-071-17 09/07/2016 TR19968 11.00 11.00 Single Famil Residential 1100-011-02 09/07/2016 TR18966 7.00 7.00 Single Family Residential 0201-055-52 10/03/2016 PM19619 4.07 4.07 Non -Residential 1061-691-04 10/19/2016 TR18961 7.00 7.00 Single Family Residential 0209-111-20 10/19/2016 DRC2014-00388 1.00 1.00 Single Family Residential 0209-123-05 11/02/2016 DRC2013-00896 1.00 1.00 Single Family Residential 0202-161-10, 11 & 20 12/07/2016 DRC2008-00909 0.67 0.67 Non -Residential Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #15 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2017/18 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 (Local Streets) P1168 A*chinwf *4 P1169 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.2 (LOCAL STREETS) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2700 Fax: 909.477.2849 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Lynne B. Kennedy, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Sam Spagnolo, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director P1170 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER 1 INTRODUCTION 3 Reason for Assessment 3 Process for Annual Assessment 3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 4 Description of the Boundaries of the District 4 Description of Improvements and Services 4 Map of Improvements 4 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 6 District Budget 6 Definitions of Budget Items 8 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 8 Overview 8 Special Benefit 9 General Benefit 10 Method of Assessment Spread 10 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM 11 ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS 13 Assessment Roll 13 Annexations 13 P1171 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on June 21, 2017, the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 17-048, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (Local Streets) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed the City Engineer to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2017/18 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay for the acquisition of street lights, the installation of Light Emitting Diode (LED) street lighting, and estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #16 Fiscal Year 2017/18 Budget Expenditures Operations and Maintenance $ 543,050 Capital Expenditures 4,632,010 Debt Service 228,330 Total Expenditures Budget 5,403,390 Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies 368,300 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 4,030 Subtotal - Taxes 372,330 Other Revenues 1,000 Advances from Capital Reserve Fund 4,586,160 Transfers In 350,170 Total Revenues Budget 5,309,660 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ (93,730) Total District EBU Count 9,307.32 Actual Assessment per EBU $ 39.97 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU $ 39.97 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #16 P1172 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. 2. 1 have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirely of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, I certify that the Annual Engineer's Report and Assessment Diagram included herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #16 P1173 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements, the installation of LED street lighting, and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the District for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the District by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the District. • Refers to the Engineer's Report, on file with the City Clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the City Clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #16 P1174 During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including the improvements, to the zones within the District, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to, the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. PLANS AND SPECIFI CA TIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Descrivtion of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as the entire City west of Haven. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of street lights, traffic signals and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The maintenance and servicing includes, but is not limited to, furnishing electric current for public lighting facilities including street lights and traffic signals, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in operational and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, in order to lower expenses of the District. Beginning in Fiscal Year 2017/18, the acquisition by the City of the street lights and installation of LED street lighting specially benefiting the properties within the District is proposed to be added to the improvements. Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of street light and traffic signal improvements to be maintained using District funds. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #16 P1175 9 1 1 F Grove A v w � w• • � i ai■1■�1 r' +tom Vineyard Av i w Hallman Av ':. Archibald Av HarnnosaAv' fee - Haven AvI A. i Milliken Av • Rochester Etkvenda Av East A% T Q, Q, Cherry Av yw� ,• t:arnelen St Pow !� Holman Ave 4104WL oil 'on co Archbald Av A•• ••I % ' • i � ` • H•rmossAv Haven Av t,o-u,-,w.-Milliken Av,�.� w 1 � W n i (D (..................... t� Day C reek Bl 1 ry 1 l Ellwanda Av East Av l i ;i ............ 1 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #16 cD v 0 a. r_ N M M _C f� T Q, Q, Cherry Av yw� ,• t:arnelen St Pow !� Holman Ave 4104WL oil 'on co Archbald Av A•• ••I % ' • i � ` • H•rmossAv Haven Av t,o-u,-,w.-Milliken Av,�.� w 1 � W n i (D (..................... t� Day C reek Bl 1 ry 1 l Ellwanda Av East Av l i ;i ............ 1 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #16 a I Irk -1 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the District levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Fiscal Year 2017/18 Budget Expenditures Operations and Maintenance: Contract Services: Contract Services/General $ 670 Utilities: Electric Utilities 498,950 Assessment Administration 40,030 Adm in./General Overhead 3,400 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 543,050 Capital Expenditures: Captial Project 4,632,010 Debt Service: Interest Expense 37,240 Principal Repayments 191,090 Subtotal - Debt Service 228,330 Total Expenditures Budget $ 5,403,390 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #16 P1177 Fiscal Year 2017/18 Budget Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies $ 368,300 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 4,030 Subtotal - Taxes 372,330 Other Revenues: Developer Energizing Fee 1,000 Advances from Capital Reserve Fund 4,586,160 Transfer In: Transfer In - General Fund 350,170 Total Revenues Budget $ 5,309,660 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ (93,730) Total Gross Estimated Assessments $ 372,013.58 Total District EBU Count 9,307.32 Actual Assessment per EBU - Fiscal Year 2017/18 $ 39.97 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU - Fiscal Year 2017/18 $ 39.97 The maximum allowable assessment per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in Fiscal Year 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the total amount of funds needed to maintain the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Operating Reserve Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2017 $ 246,913 Contribution to Reserve - Fiscal Year 2017/18 (93,730) Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2018 $153,183 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #16 P1178 Definitions of Budaet Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time and part-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Additionally, this includes benefits available to City employees. Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District. Utilities: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity and telephone services, as required, for the operation and maintenance of the street lights, traffic signals, and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual Engineer's Report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all central services departments of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational District within the City's administrative structure. Capital Outlay: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include installation of safety lights and other large improvements. Debt Service: This item includes the repayment of interest and principal to the City Capital Reserve Fund for the acquisition of street lights and installation of LED street lighting within the District. Other Revenues: This includes other revenues that are not levied through the annual assessments that support the District operations. These other revenues may include: interest earnings and Developer Energizing Fees. METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Overview Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #16 a 114:11 improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the public lighting facilities, including traffic signals. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 commencing with Section 5000) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]. Section 22547 of the 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement'. Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights -of -ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, safety, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and • providing for safe vehicular and pedestrian access for properties within the District, and • providing beautification and overall enhancement to properties within the District. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #16 P1180 The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the safety and visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District However, it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the District that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined; however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since Fiscal Year 1996/97. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The EBU method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one EBU. Every other land -use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land -use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land -use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #16 P1181 Land -Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Property Type (County Use Code) EBU Value Multiplier Single Family Residential 1.00 Parcel Multi -Family Residential 1.00 Unit Non -Residential 2.00 Acre The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2017/18 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the street lights and traffic signals is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #16 Maximum Allowable Actual Assessment Asessment Rate Total Property Type (County Use Code Rate per EBU per EBU Units/Acres Total EBUs Single Family Residential $39.97 $39.97 7,248.00 7,248.00 Multi -Family Residential 1 39.97 39.97 1,989.00 1,989.00 Non -Residential 1 39.97 39.97 35.16 70.32 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the street lights and traffic signals is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #16 P1182 ii'3}sxx 3 Ei3 SIO Q;6SSi Q a r 4f��8�9 N � m $¢ a��' :3 D v C n g t 'm Grove AV aQii$iYgl Q 51. Carnelian St Vineyard AV A S N Hellman AV Hellman AV Archibald AV Archibald AV Hermosa AV Hermosa AV Haven AV. i Haven AV Milliken AV ._....•�.._..^.� Milliken AV !.. J ♦w Rochester AV Rochester AV wvl1. "-N r i. ............ _._..... Day Creek 1311 �+1. i Etiwanda AV Etiwanda AV i ? Ln East Av i a N CJI M � 16 `•.� o a Cherry AV `n arn i vim n �. N N Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #16 P1183 ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2017/18 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2017/18 actual assessments for the District: Property Type (County Use Code) Actual Assessment Rate per EBU Total Units/Acres Total EBUs Actual Allowable Assessment Single Family Residential $39.97 7,248.00 7,248.00 $289,702.56 Multi -Family Residential 39.97 1,989.00 1,989.00 79,500.33 Non -Residential 39.97 35.16 70.32 2,810.69 Total 1.00 1 9,272.161 9,307.321 372,013.58 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations The following Annexations are effective for Fiscal Year 2017/18: n Annexation Date Project Name Total Units/Acres Total EBUs PropertyType 1061-611-15 08/03/2016 DRC2014-00893 1.00 1.00 Single Family Residential 1061-691-04 10/19/2016 TR 18961 7.00 7.00 Single Family Residential 0209-111-20 10/19/2016 DRC2014-00388 1.00 1.00 Single Family Residential 0209-123-05 11/02/2016 1 DRC2013-008961 1.00 1 1.00 Single Family Residential Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #16 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2017/18 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 (Victoria Planned Community) P1184 cchmea 4ki-7 P1185 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 (VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2700 Fax: 909.477.2849 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Lynne B. Kennedy, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Sam Spagnolo, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director P1186 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER 1 INTRODUCTION 3 Reason for Assessment 3 Process for Annual Assessment 3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 4 Description of the Boundaries of the District 4 Description of Improvements and Services 4 Map of Improvements 5 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 7 District Budget 7 Definitions of Budget Items 9 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 9 Overview 9 Special Benefit 10 General Benefit 11 Method of Assessment Spread 11 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM 12 ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS 14 Assessment Roll 14 Annexations 14 P1187 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on June 21, 2017, the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 17-048, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Street Light Maintenance District No. 3 (Victoria Planned Community) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed the City Engineer to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2017/18 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay for the acquisition of street lights, the installation of Light Emitting Diode (LED) street lighting, and estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. Expenditures Personnel Services Operations and Maintenance Capital Expenditures Debt Service Total Expenditures Budget Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection Subtotal - Taxes Other Revenues Advances from Capital Reserve Fund Total Revenues Budget Fiscal Year 2017/18 Budget $ 27,800 238,720 1,782,670 87,880 2,137,070 351,930 3,860 355,790 13,590 1,765,020 2,134,400 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ (2,670) Total District EBU Count 7,539.42 Actual Assessment per EBU $ 47.15 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU $ 47.15 Land Scape Maintenance District No. 3 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #17 P1188 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. 2. 1 have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, I certify that the Annual Engineer's Report and Assessment Diagram included herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #17 P1189 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements, the installation of LED street lighting, and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the District for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the District by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the District. • Refers to the Engineer's Report, on file with the City Clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the City Clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #17 P1190 During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including the improvements, to the zones within the District, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to, the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area located south of the 210 Freeway, west of Etiwanda, southwest of the 1-15 Freeway and east of Haven, also known as the Victoria Neighborhood Planned Community, and are more particularly in the diagram of the District included herein. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of street lights, traffic signals and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The maintenance and servicing includes, but is not limited to, furnishing electric current for public lighting facilities including street lights and traffic signals, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in operational and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, in order to lower expenses of the District. Beginning in Fiscal Year 2017/18, the acquisition by the City of the street lights and installation of LED street lighting specially benefiting the properties within the District is proposed to be added to the improvements. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #17 P1191 Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of street light and traffic signal improvements to be maintained using District funds. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #17 D 0 f Haven AV to L N r • 4'..qp f s •fee �'ly00 CD ....t • ♦♦ t• •� 1 • ••i� N N•• � S'• Milliken AV (_ �7 :=3 soft <D C7 (Ji (n ,2 ro m C. 4 •..ti......�•.•.M ...•i•.•�....I... 41 go ... •. t N • jj • r • ((D 60 c • tC' e go G Haven AV to L N r • 4'..qp f s •fee �'ly00 .:so Sti' :~ • ....t • ♦♦ t• •� 1 • ••i� N N•• � S'• Milliken AV (_ �7 :=3 soft •' I..i: l.t.• • .04•0w P1192 . 000609 Owsee.•• •.00•• r f• ., M .W Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #17 • . :• .•006%as0 Rochester Av 4'..qp o 0L t•'•*•.•. ....t • Ili%� �•�� N N•• � iii k reol : �: •..ti......�•.•.M ...•i•.•�....I... 41 go ... •. t N • jj • r • 60 • e go ••• Etiwanda AV _ �___ _ : : ~ • I_ .W Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #17 P1193 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the District levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Operations and Maintenance: Fiscal Year Operations and Maintenance: 2017/18 Budget Expenditures 180 Personnel Services: 50 Regular Salaries $ 18,910 Fringe Benefits 8,890 Subtotal - Personnel 27,800 Operations and Maintenance: Operations and Maintenance: Training 180 Membership Dues 50 O & M/General 9,940 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 10,170 Utilities: Electric Utilities 184,200 Assessment Administration 36,000 Adm in./General Overhead 8,350 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 238,720 Capital Expenditures: Captial Project 1,782,670 Debt Service: Interest Expense 14,330 Principal Repayments 73,550 Subtotal - Debt Service 87,880 Total Expenditures Budget $ 2,137,070 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #17 P1194 Fiscal Year 2017/18 Budget Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies $ 351,930 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 3,860 Subtotal - Taxes 355,790 Other Revenues: Interest Earnings 13,590 Advances from Capital Reserve Fund 1,765,020 Total Revenues Budget $ 2,134,400 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ (2,670) Total Gross Estimated Assessments $ 355,483.65 Total District EBU Count 7,539.42 Actual Assessment per EBU - Fiscal Year 2017/18 $ 47.15 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU - Fiscal Year 2017/18 $ 47.15 The maximum allowable assessment per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in Fiscal Year 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the total amount of funds needed to maintain the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Operating Reserve Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2017 $1,233,502 Contribution to Reserve - Fiscal Year 2017/18 (2,670) Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2018 $1,230,832 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #17 P1195 Definitions of Budaet Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time and part-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Additionally, this includes benefits available to City employees. Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District. Utilities: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity and telephone services, as required, for the operation and maintenance of the street lights, traffic signals, and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual Engineer's Report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all central services departments of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational District within the City's administrative structure. Capital Outlay: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include installation of safety lights and other large improvements. Debt Service: This item includes the repayment of interest and principal to the City General Fund for the acquisition of street lights and installation of LED street lighting within the District. Other Revenues: This includes other revenues that are not levied through the annual assessments that support the District operations. These other revenues may include: interest earnings and Developer Energizing Fees. METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Overview Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #17 P1196 of providing certain public improvements which include the public lighting facilities, including traffic signals. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 commencing with Section 5000) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]. Section 22547 of the 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement". Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights -of -ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, safety, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and • providing for safe vehicular and pedestrian access for properties within the District, and • providing beautification and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #17 P1197 share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: the safety and visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District However, it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined; however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since Fiscal Year 1996/97. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The EBU method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EBU). Every other land -use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land -use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land - use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #17 P1198 Land -Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Property Type (County Use Code) EBU Value Multiplier Single Family Residential 1.00 Parcel Multi -Family Residential 1.00 Unit Non -Residential 2.00 Acre The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2017/18 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the street lights and traffic signals is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #17 Maximum Allowable Actual Assessment Asessment Rate Total Property Type (County Use Code Rate per EBU per EBU Units/Acres Total EBUs Single Family Residential $47.15 $47.15 6,463.00 6,463.00 Multi -Family Residential 47.15 47.151 589.00 589.00 Non -Residential 47.15 47.151 238.38 487.42 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the street lights and traffic signals is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #17 P1199 II��4$ Bi7eg�I _� CDD 9 Fall m W 3 Ijd[ s�,i)'Ef o0 0 QfRiy9ii f$i Cn .M W CCD (� �'41 gaa?Y Grove Av fe� is;l�¢a � � o. i 1 • Carnelian St Vineyard Av I A s j Hellman AvY Heilman Av I � Archibald Av I Archibald Av I o I Hermosa Av j Hermosa Av I Haven Av! Haven Av i Milliken Av!! ._.._.._.._.._.a Milliken Av r..J Rochester Av CO Rochester Av ON Day Creek B1 N. i r i Etiwanda Av LEtiwanda Av i �+ A i I IrM, SO East Av D m i •,. S_ ca =rN walk Mm N CD rQ. �._.._.._.. to Cherry Av p M i' cn rl- n D. v a n W Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #17 P1200 ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2017/18 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2017/18 actual assessments for the District: Property Type (County Use Code) Actual Assessment Rate per EBU Total Units/Acres Total EBUs Total Assessment Single Family Residential $47.15 6,463.00 6,463.00 $304,730.45 Multi -Family Residential 47.15 589.00 589.00 $27,771.35 Non -Residential 47.15 243.71 487.42 $22,981.85 Totals 7,295.71 7,539.42 $355,483.65 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations The following annexation is effective for Fiscal Year 2017/18: Apn Annexation Date Project Name Total Units/ Acres Total EBUs PropertyType 1089-011-04 03/16/2016 TR 18508 31.00 31.00 Single Family Residential Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #17 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2017/18 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community) P1201 .A achrvbl- #-I6 P1202 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.4 (TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2700 Fax: 909.477.2849 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Lynne B. Kennedy, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Sam Spagnolo, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Process for Annual Assessment PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS Description of the Boundaries of the District Description of Improvements and Services Map of Improvements ESTIMATE OF COSTS District Budget Definitions of Budget Items METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Overview Special Benefit General Benefit Method of Assessment Spread ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS Assessment Roll Annexations 1 3 3 3 4 4 4 5 7 7 9 9 9 10 11 11 12 14 14 14 P1203 P12O4 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on June 21, 2017, the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 17-048, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Street Light Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed the City Engineer to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2017/18 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay for the acquisition of street lights, the installation of Light Emitting Diode (LED) street lighting, and estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. Expenditures Personnel Services Operations and Maintenance Capital Expenditures Debt Service Total Expenditures Budget Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection Subtotal - Taxes Other Revenues Advances from Capital Reserve Fund Total Revenues Budget Fiscal Year 2017/18 Budget $ 27,800 130,380 1,037,860 45,740 1,241,780 162,370 1,760 164,130 5,100 918,680 1,087,910 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ (153,870) Total District EBU Count 5,663.04 Actual Assessment per EBU $ 28.96 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU $ 28.96 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #18 P12O5 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. 2. 1 have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, I certify that the Annual Engineer's Report and Assessment Diagram included herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #18 P1206 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements, the installation of LED street lighting, and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the District for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the District by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the District. • Refers to the Engineer's Report, on file with the City Clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the City Clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #18 P1207 During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including the improvements, to the zones within the District, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to, the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area of the City known as the Terra Vista Planned Community, which is located north of Foothill, west of Rochester, east of Haven, south of Base Line and includes the northeast corner of Base Line and Haven. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of street lights, traffic signals and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The maintenance and servicing includes, but is not limited to, furnishing electric current for public lighting facilities including street lights and traffic signals, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in operational and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, in order to lower expenses of the District. Beginning in Fiscal Year 2017/18, the acquisition by the City of the street lights and installation of LED street lighting specially benefiting the properties within the District is proposed to be added to the improvements. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #18 P12O8 Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of street light and traffic signal improvements to be maintained using District funds. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #18 0 ::::st: 0. r - 0 c- i i10 o , 0 C-) Q r i, (/) HavenAv m N (p _ C tC tEiS3• of !lam! ••: • • ••• • • • } Bt BILI • N i ![[77•• Ow 000 f • • • f!6!6! $3ii3 f.:• :' : '0 : • •• M•� • •• ; • • : • • i •% •• • •• •� • • • �' r ti •• •• M •• • • •• • •• 00 M06 • • • _°• • • • • •• • 08 0 0 • • • : ••• •• M • •% • • •• • ••• •• • • •• . • • a • • • 0 ::::st: 0. • • • • ° •� . °° o• • ♦ .. • •°M •:•f.•� + ••.• • • ° • ° • •oo ••° •• • • .. . s • . .• •• 00.;0.0 .. %••• • • 0• • • 9 • 0 • • •• ' • •• • 0:00. . . •. . • 0. . • ; . • . • . �.. • . s • go 0. 0 . • • . • • •.• • • ° • • . •.• • •. • 0000 • .• • . • P1209 Milliken Av �- 0 — Z Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #18 r - 0 c- i i10 0 C-) Q r i, (/) cr m N (p C tC !lam! • • • • ° •� . °° o• • ♦ .. • •°M •:•f.•� + ••.• • • ° • ° • •oo ••° •• • • .. . s • . .• •• 00.;0.0 .. %••• • • 0• • • 9 • 0 • • •• ' • •• • 0:00. . . •. . • 0. . • ; . • . • . �.. • . s • go 0. 0 . • • . • • •.• • • ° • • . •.• • •. • 0000 • .• • . • P1209 Milliken Av �- 0 — Z Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #18 P1210 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the District levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Fiscal Year 2017/18 Budget Expenditures Personnel Services: Regular Salaries $ 18,910 Fringe Benefits 8,890 Subtotal - Personnel 27,800 Operations and Maintenance: Operations and Maintenance: Training 190 Membership Dues 50 O & M/General 4,940 Equipment Operations and Maintenance 1,000 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 6,180 Utilities: Electric Utilities 96,440 Assessment Administration 22,050 Admin./General Overhead 5,710 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 130,380 Capital Expenditures: Capital Project $ 1,037,860 Debt Service: Interest Expense 7,460 Principal Repayments 38,280 Subtotal - Debt Service 45,740 Total Expenditures Budget $ 1,241,780 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #18 P1211 Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection Subtotal - Taxes Other Revenues: Interest Earnings Advances from Capital Reserve Fund Fiscal Year 2017/18 Budget $ 162,370 1,760 164,130 5,100 918,680 Total Revenues Budget $ 1,087,910 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ (153,870) Total Gross Estimated Assessments $ 164,001.64 Total District EBU Count 5,663.04 Actual Assessment per EBU - Fiscal Year 2017/18 $ 28.96 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU - Fiscal Year 2017/18 $ 28.96 The maximum allowable assessment per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in Fiscal Year 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the total amount of funds needed to maintain the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Operating Reserve Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2017 $ 552,378 Contribution to Reserve - Fiscal Year 2017/18 (153,870) Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2018 $ 398,508 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #18 P1212 Definitions of Budaet Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time and part-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Additionally, this includes benefits available to City employees. Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District. Utilities: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity and telephone services, as required, for the operation and maintenance of the street lights, traffic signals, and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual Engineer's Report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all central services departments of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational District within the City's administrative structure. Capital Outlay: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include installation of safety lights and other large improvements. Debt Service: This item includes the repayment of interest and principal to the City Capital Reserve Fund for the acquisition of street lights and installation of LED street lighting within the District. Other Revenues: This includes other revenues that are not levied through the annual assessments that support the District operations. These other revenues may include: interest earnings and Developer Energizing Fees. METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Overview Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #18 P1213 improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the public lighting facilities, including traffic signals. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 commencing with Section 5000) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]. Section 22547 of the 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement". Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights -of -ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, safety, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and • providing for safe vehicular and pedestrian access for properties within the District, and • providing beautification and overall enhancement to properties within the District. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #18 P1214 The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the safety and visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District However, it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined; however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since Fiscal Year 1996/97. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The EBU method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EBU). Every other land -use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land -use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land - use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #18 P1215 Land -Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Property Type (County Use Code) EBU Value Multiplier Single Family Residential 1.00 Parcel Multi -Family Residential 0.50 Unit Non -Residential 2.00 Acre The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2017/18 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the street lights and traffic signals is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #18 Maximum Allowable Actual Assessment Asessment Rate Total Property Type (County Use Code) Rate per EBU per EBU Units/Acres Total EBUs Single Family Residential $28.96 $28.96 2,652.00 2,652.00 Multi -Family Residential 28.96 28.96 5,036.00 2,518.00 Non -Residential 28.96 28.96 246.52 493.04 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the street lights and traffic signals is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #18 S`A[:1 Iis4 as �A3 E�f�?3i9ii _ � N 'Eat,E D T aWi N a °Ygli H�ci (n ;U CO Grove AvCL m En 1aS1l.il4�i�✓1 Vineyard Av s � Hellman Av Archibald Av 11 i R Hermosa Av = Haven Av! Milliken Av 1 Rochester Av ; Etiwanda Av A S 52 East Av D g W o W r N � CJt � o ,6 r a o :3 Cherry Av rr • (D n = o a a A r J Rochester Av *. Day Creek Etiwanda Av Carnelian St 1 Hellman Av Archibald Av Hermosa Av Haven Av Milliken Av W POOLr "ftPw*,. W z� pwM wz W Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #18 P1217 ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2017/18 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2017/18 actual assessments for the District: Property Type (County Use Code) Actual Assessment Rate per EBU Total Units/Acres Total EBUs Total Assessment Single Family Residential $28.96 2,652.00 2,652.00 $76,801.92 Multi -Family Residential 28.96 5,036.00 2,518.00 72,921.28 Non -Residential 28.96 246.52 493.04 14,278.44 Totals 7,934.52 5,663.04 $164,001.64 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations There were no Annexations for Fiscal Year 2017/18. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #18 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2017/18 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 (Caryn Planned Community) P1218 kffauhrnen* 11 S`AF01 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 5 (CARYN PLANNED COMMUNITY) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2700 Fax: 909.477.2849 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Lynne B. Kennedy, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Sam Spagnolo, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director P1220 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER 1 INTRODUCTION 3 Reason for Assessment 3 Process for Annual Assessment 3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 4 Description of the Boundaries of the District 4 Description of Improvements and Services 4 Map of Improvements 5 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 7 District Budget 7 Definitions of Budget Items 9 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 9 Overview 9 Special Benefit 10 General Benefit 11 Method of Assessment Spread 11 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM 12 ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS 14 Assessment Roll 14 Annexations 14 P1221 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on June 21, 2017, the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 17-048, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Street Light Maintenance District No. 5 (Caryn Planned Community) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed the City Engineer to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2017/18 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay for the acquisition of street lights, the installation of Light Emitting Diode (LED) street lighting, and estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. Fiscal Year 2017/18 Budget Expenditures Personnel Services $ 6,530 Operations and Maintenance 56,910 Capital Expenditures 405,480 Debt Service 19,990 Total Expenditures Budget 488,910 Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies 43,710 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 510 Subtotal - Taxes 44,220 Advances from Capital Reserve Fund 401,470 Total Revenues Budget 445,690 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ (43,220) Total District EBU Count 1,276.00 Actual Assessment per EBU $ 34.60 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU $ 34.60 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #19 P1222 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. 2. 1 have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefitted Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, I certify that the Annual Engineer's Report, and Assessment Diagram included herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #19 P1223 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements, the installation of LED street lighting, and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the District for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the District by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the District. • Refers to the Engineer's Report, on file with the City Clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the City Clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #19 P1224 During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including the improvements, to the zones within the District, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to, the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area located north of the 210 Freeway, south of Banyan, west of Rochester and east of Milliken, also known as the Caryn Planned Community. The boundaries also include Tract No. 13835 east of Rochester and Tracts No. 13748, 13857 and 13858 west of Milliken. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of street lights, traffic signals and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The maintenance and servicing includes, but is not limited to, furnishing electric current for public lighting facilities including street lights and traffic signals, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in operational and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, in order to lower expenses of the District. Beginning in Fiscal Year 2017/18, the acquisition by the City of the street lights and installation of LED street lighting specially benefiting the properties within the District is proposed to be added to the improvements. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #19 P1225 Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of street light and traffic signal improvements to be maintained using District funds. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #19 ill 3,177 SITM ��saSa a ;Eaia i L��� Milliken Av Rochester Av S `WI -I r i • j • i • . v rn . � 4 N (D (p C f0� S `WI -I i • • i • . . 00 '' ' S `WI -I �)— Z Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #19 i • i co • . • . . g • • . . . • 1 .y • . . . . . • . • .. • ...... ............ . . •0 0�p . . .• •. O . ' .' • ' . • . • . y • . so . • M . . • . • . • • ' _ .• .. _ ..• . .... ... r • . v • `.. �)— Z Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #19 P1227 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the District levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Fiscal Year 2017/18 Budget Expenditures Personnel Services: Regular Salaries $ 4,440 Fringe Benefits 2,090 Subtotal - Personnel 6,530 Operations and Maintenance: Operations and Maintenance: Training 180 Membership Dues 50 O & M/General 8,990 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 9,220 Utilities: Electric Utilities 38,480 Assessment Administration 7,020 Admin./General Overhead 2,190 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 56,910 Capital Expenditures: Captial Project 405,480 Debt Service: Interest Expense 3,260 Principal Repayments 16,730 Subtotal - Debt Service 19,990 Total Expenditures Budget $ 488,910 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #19 P1228 Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection Subtotal - Taxes Advances from Capital Reserve Fund Total Revenues Budget Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance Total Gross Estimated Assessments Total District EBU Count Actual Assessment per EBU - Fiscal Year 2017/18 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU - Fiscal Year 2017/18 The maximum allowable assessment per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in Fiscal Year 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the total amount of funds needed to maintain the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Operating Reserve Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2017 $ (102,708) Contribution to Reserve - Fiscal Year 2017/18 (43,220) Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2018 $ (145,928) Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #19 Fiscal Year 2017/18 Budget $ 43,710 510 44,220 401,470 $ 445,690 $ (43,220) $ 44,149.60 1,276.00 $ 34.60 $ 34.60 The maximum allowable assessment per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in Fiscal Year 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the total amount of funds needed to maintain the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Operating Reserve Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2017 $ (102,708) Contribution to Reserve - Fiscal Year 2017/18 (43,220) Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2018 $ (145,928) Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #19 S P*4:'. Definitions of Budaet Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time and part-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Additionally, this includes benefits available to City employees. Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District. Utilities: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity and telephone services, as required, for the operation and maintenance of the street lights, traffic signals, and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual Engineer's Report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all central services departments of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational District within the City's administrative structure. Capital Outlay: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include installation of safety lights and other large improvements. Debt Service: This item includes the repayment of interest and principal to the City Capital Reserve Fund for the acquisition of street lights and installation of LED street lighting within the District. Other Revenues: This includes other revenues that are not levied through the annual assessments that support the District operations. These other revenues may include: interest earnings and Developer Energizing Fees. METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Overview Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #19 P123O improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the public lighting facilities, including traffic signals. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 commencing with Section 5000) hof the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]. Section 22547 of the 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement". Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights -of -ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, safety, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and • providing for safe vehicular and pedestrian access for properties within the District, and • providing beautification and overall enhancement to properties within the District. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #19 P1231 The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the safety and visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District However, it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined, however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since Fiscal Year 1996/97. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The EBU method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one EBU. The following table provides the weighting factors applied by land -use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land -Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Property Type (County Use Code) EBU Value Multiplier Single Family Residential 1.00 Parcel Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #19 P1232 The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2017/18 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the street lights and traffic signals is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #19 Maximum Allowable Actual Assessment Asessment Rate Total Property Type (County Use Code Rate per EBU per EBU Units/Acres Total EBUs Single Family Residential $34.601 $34.601 1,276.001 11276.00 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the street lights and traffic signals is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #19 P1233 '!a�a=; i a s a v N 3!Iz4YI-1$ i (C hit; ima3a as W ;U Ea S a ° t 8 Qp (D �....+..�.....��L.�.� Grove AV ba a;���� , a Ilium } '. i$ !Carnelian St Vine �rd AV i s CO Hellman AV i Hellman AV t Archibald AV Archibald AV i Hermosa AV j Hermosa AV Haven AV Haven AV 1 Milliken AV ...,...........J Milliken AV 1 i Rochester AV Rochester AV --Day Creek BI � Etiwanda AV �Etnnranda AV i = $ S2 East AV t_,_„_„ i 3 a 8 W oo r tJ N ._! Cherry AV j .• 0 rC- n :3 CL POL Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #19 P1234 ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2017/18 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2017/18 actual assessment for the District: A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations There were no Annexations for Fiscal Year 2017/18. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #19 Actual Assessment Total Property Type County Use Code Rate per EBU Units/Acres Total EBUs Total Assessment Single Family Residential $34.60 1,276.00 1,276.00 $44,149.60 Totals 1,276.001 1,276.001 $44,149.60 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations There were no Annexations for Fiscal Year 2017/18. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #19 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2017/18 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial Industrial) P1235 hfacchwg',r— #'Lc P1236 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 (COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2700 Fax: 909.477.2849 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Lynne B. Kennedy, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Sam Spagnolo, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director P1237 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Process for Annual Assessment PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS Description of the Boundaries of the District Description of Improvements and Services Map of Improvements ESTIMATE OF COSTS District Budget Definitions of Budget Items METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Overview Special Benefit General Benefit Method of Assessment Spread ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS Assessment Roll 1 3 3 3 4 4 4 5 7 7 9 9 9 10 11 11 12 14 14 Annexations 14 P1238 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on June 21, 2017, the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 17-048, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial Industrial) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed the City Engineer to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2017/18 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay for the acquisition of street lights, the installation of Light Emitting Diode (LED) street lighting, and estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #20 Fiscal Year 2017/18 Budget Expenditures Personnel Services $ 27,800 Operations and Maintenance 87,000 Capital Expenditures 629,240 Debt Service 31,020 Total Expenditures Budget 775,060 Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies 133,530 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 880 Subtotal - Taxes 134,410 Other Revenues 4,540 Advances from Capital Reserve Fund 623,010 Total Revenues Budget 761,960 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ (13,100) Total District EBU Count 2,623.98 Actual Assessment per EBU $ 51.40 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU $ 51.40 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #20 P1239 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. 2. 1 have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, I certify that the Annual Engineer's Report and Assessment Diagram included herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #20 P1240 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements, the installation of LED street lighting, and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the District for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the District by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the District. • Refers to the Engineer's Report, on file with the City Clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the City Clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #20 P1241 During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including the improvements, to the zones within the District, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to, express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as the commercial and industrial area of the City which is generally bounded by Foothill on the north, 4`h on the south, East on the east and Grove on the west. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of street lights, traffic signals and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The maintenance and servicing includes, but is not limited to, furnishing electric current for public lighting facilities including street lights and traffic signals, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in operational and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, in order to lower expenses of the District. Beginning in Fiscal Year 2017/18, the acquisition by the City of the street lights and installation of LED street lighting specially benefiting the properties within the District is proposed to be added to the improvements. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #20 P1242 Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of street light and traffic signal improvements to be maintained using District funds. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #20 1PI P1243 T Grove Av �----�+� � v Ila •1 -MMM, 4460 M alb• hUllkan Av am . ■ O" .. Rocha•hr Ar �. Etkvanda Av 91 �' LEast Av i i Vlnayard Av • a 'w co 40 HWImanAv Archbald Av 0 In cn r m r •e ArthllraM Av • _r rn do f �+►�[ WW Hermosa Av • N i N HavonAv c M Haven Av Ila •1 -MMM, 4460 M alb• hUllkan Av am . ■ O" .. Rocha•hr Ar �. Etkvanda Av 91 �' LEast Av n � s0 'f; S Crnallan St • i i • � 'w co i Archbald Av 0 In cn 0 m IL o _r rn Hermosa Av f �+►�[ N i N c Haven Av V7 G n � s0 'f; S Crnallan St • Holman Ave 'w co i Archbald Av Hermosa Av f �+►�[ i • Haven Av M111ken Av ................. Day C BI reek 1 Ellwands Av .r EaM Av x Cherry Av Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #20 P1244 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the District levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Capital Expenditures: Captial Project 629,240 Debt Service: Interest Expense 5,060 Principal Repayments 25,960 Subtotal - Debt Service 31,020 Total Expenditures Budget $ 775,060 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #20 Fiscal Year 2017/18 Budget Expenditures Personnel Services: Regular Salaries $ 18,910 Fringe Benefits 8,890 Subtotal - Personnel 27,800 Operations and Maintenance: Operations and Maintenance: Training 180 Membership Dues 50 O & M/General 6,940 Equipment Operations and Maintenance 800 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 7,970 Utilities: Electric Utilities 67,370 Assessment Administration 5,900 Adm in./General Overhead 5,760_ Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 87,000 Capital Expenditures: Captial Project 629,240 Debt Service: Interest Expense 5,060 Principal Repayments 25,960 Subtotal - Debt Service 31,020 Total Expenditures Budget $ 775,060 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #20 P1245 Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection Subtotal - Taxes Fiscal Year 2017/18 Budget $ 133,530 880 134,410 Other Revenues: Interest Earnings 4,540 Advances from Capital Reserve Fund 623,010 Total Revenues Budget $ 761,960 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ (13,100) Total Gross Estimated Assessments $ 134,872.57 Total District EBU Count 2,623.98 Actual Assessment per EBU - Fiscal Year 2017/18 $ 51.40 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU - Fiscal Year 2017/18 $ 51.40 The maximum allowable assessment per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in Fiscal Year 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the total amount of funds needed to maintain the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Operating Reserve Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2017 $ 437,785 Contribution to Reserve - Fiscal Year 2017/18 (13,100) Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2018 $ 424,685 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #20 Definitions of Budaet Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time and part-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Additionally, this includes benefits available to City employees. Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District. Utilities: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity and telephone services, as required, for the operation and maintenance of the street lights, traffic signals, and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual Engineer's Report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all central services departments of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational District within the City's administrative structure. Capital Outlay: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include installation of safety lights and other large improvements. Debt Service: This item includes the repayment of interest and principal to the City Capital Reserve Fund for the acquisition of street lights and installation of LED street lighting within the District. Other Revenues: This includes other revenues that are not levied through the annual assessments that support the District operations. These other revenues may include: interest earnings and Developer Energizing Fees. METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Overview Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #20 P1247 improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the public lighting facilities, including traffic signals. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 commencing with Section 5000) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]. Section 22547 of the 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement". Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights -of -ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, safety, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and • providing for safe vehicular and pedestrian access for properties within the District, and • providing beautification and overall enhancement to properties within the District. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #20 P1248 The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the safety and visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District However, it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined, however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since Fiscal Year 1996/97. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The EBU method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one EBU. Every other land -use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land -use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land -use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #20 s`zVol Land -Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Property Type (County Use Code) EBU Value Multiplier Non -Residential 2.00 Acre The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2017/18 maximum allowable assessment rate for the District: The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the street lights and traffic signals is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #20 Maximum Allowable Actual Assessment Asessment Rate Total PropertyT a County Use Code Rate per EBU per EBU Units/Acres Total EBUs Non -Residential $51.401 $51.401 21623.98 2,623.98 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the street lights and traffic signals is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #20 P125O t Hellman Av D $ W Rai, v 3 Milliken Av q La m Zia 99a $ cn s#,l�EB ;q�jg�xr} s - �, r ea�IIY98"�� Grove Av W N N ac�gil� �jsgg�` d 3931)6i`9$a�§ a o Vineyard Av CD S � Hellman Av N Archibald Av Hermosa Av Haven Av Milliken Av Rochester Av Etiwanda Av �2 East Av Carnelian St Hellman Av D $ W Hermosa Av Haven Av o Milliken Av oo r N L............ Day Creek B1 � CJI @NIL a o r' Cherry Av o 0 c. r on O � r M► 01 M. rR Carnelian St Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #20 Hellman Av Archibald Av Hermosa Av Haven Av ._.._.._.._.._.� Milliken Av co Rochester Av L............ Day Creek B1 tD @NIL r i Etiwanda Av i r � M► M. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #20 P1251 ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2017/18 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2017/18 actual assessment for the District: A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations The following Annexations are effective for the 2017/18 Fiscal Year: Apn Actual Project Name Total Units/ Acres Total EBUs Prope T e Assessment Total DRC2015-00650 2.16 Property Type (County Use Code) Rate per EBU Units/Acres Total EBUs Total Assessment Non -Residential $51.40 2,623.98 2,623.98 $134,872.57 Totals 2.22 1 2,623.98 2,623.981 $134,872.57 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations The following Annexations are effective for the 2017/18 Fiscal Year: Apn Annexation Date Project Name Total Units/ Acres Total EBUs Prope T e 0229-341-03 07/06/2016 DRC2015-00650 2.16 2.16 Non -Residential 0229-341-15 07/20/2016 DRC2015-00402 2.40 2.40 Non -Residential 0208-353-14 07/20/2016 PM19666 2.22 1 2.22 1 Non -Residential 0201-055-52 10/03/2016 PM19619 4.07 4.07 Non -Residential 0202-161-10, 11 & 20 12/07/2016 DRC2008-00909 0.67 0.67 Non -Residential Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #20 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2017/18 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) P1252 Machined- #2/ P1253 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 (NORTH ETIWANDA) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2700 Fax: 909.477.2849 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Lynne B. Kennedy, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Sam Spagnolo, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director P1254 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER 1 INTRODUCTION 3 Reason for Assessment 3 Process for Annual Assessment 3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 4 Description of the Boundaries of the District 4 Description of Improvements and Services 4 Map of Improvements 5 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 7 District Budget 7 Definitions of Budget Items 9 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 9 Overview 9 Special Benefit 10 General Benefit 11 Method of Assessment Spread 11 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM 12 ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS 14 Assessment Roll 14 Annexations 14 P1255 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on June 21, 2017, the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 17-048, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed the City Engineer to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2017/18 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay for the acquisition of street lights, the installation of Light Emitting Diode (LED) street lighting, and estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. Fiscal Year 2017/18 Budget Expenditures Personnel Services $ 20,740 Operations and Maintenance 157,310 Capital Expenditures 1,290,430 Debt Service 63,620 Total Expenditures Budget 1,532,100 Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies 127,870 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 1,700 Subtotal - Taxes 129,570 Advances from Capital Reserve Fund 1,277,650 Transfers In 105,100 Total Revenues Budget 1,512,320 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ (19,780) Total District EBU Count 3,886.00 Actual Assessment per EBU $ 33.32 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU $ 33.32 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #21 P1256 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. 2. 1 have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefitted Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, I certify that the Annual Engineer's Report and Assessment Diagram included herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #21 P1257 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements, the installation of LED street lighting, and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the District for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the District by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the District. • Refers to the Engineer's Report, on file with the City Clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the City Clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #21 P1258 During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including the improvements, to the zones within the District, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to, the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area of the City known as North Etiwanda, which is generally bounded by Highland on the south, Day Creek Channel on the west and City limits on the east and north. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of street lights, traffic signals and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The maintenance and servicing includes, but is not limited to, furnishing electric current for public lighting facilities including street lights and traffic signals, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in operational and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, in order to lower expenses of the District. Beginning in Fiscal Year 2017/18, the acquisition by the City of the street lights and installation of LED street lighting specially benefiting the properties within the District is proposed to be added to the improvements. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #21 P1259 Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of street light and traffic signal improvements to be maintained using District funds. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #21 P126O ji S li f3 r, ---Go "-Ole: .•1..• % h• • ♦ i • • J• • • i •• f: i•i ee. 00 00 00 60 00 06,0 SS i S . ] �••�� .•......N ... ...• T• • f iN i i •..M •• t• • • • •t _ .0 • f �....rr.• t �•� h CS ll • .j.o .« i ^`t iii 1. % • CS .• • 104 %e • �I }.h •• Yah. ZM •.ri . h. �• • i. • ss•• �• : ••• • M ti •. Etiwanda Av • • _ • { 1.•f. ;•••�''{ t ; • o a � � D Oa 1 0•.•. East Av j _ _.. ••• t.%60Goes ~• t • shh.•h•S • � :.�. ifM� _ = if .,4001.. 100 MN • �jjy hfI0 T �.•ti'• ...= Wardman Bullock Rd f ?. J. • .ti • 00 % • • • . . • . ••~wtr♦0 •;�i�•_ r . •i•e�N•ht � i• t •••.•. •• ••"1•Li•y.a Cherry Av a n CD `V Z Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #21 i it L to Lia cfl p M �- r_— -4 � 4 N CDD C tC� S Cherry Av a n CD `V Z Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #21 P1261 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the District levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Fiscal Year 2017/18 Budget Expenditures Personnel Services: Regular Salaries $ 14,110 Fringe Benefits 6,630 Subtotal - Personnel 20,740 Operations and Maintenance: Operations and Maintenance: Training 180 Membership Dues 50 O & M/General 4,940 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 5,170 Utilities: Electric Utilities 126,090 Assessment Administration 21,380 Adm in./General Overhead 4,670 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 157,310 Capital Expenditures: Captial Project 1,290,430 Debt Service: Interest Expense 10,380 Principal Repayments 53,240 Subtotal - Debt Service 63,620 Total Expenditures Budget $ 1,532,100_ Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #21 P1262 Fiscal Year 2017/18 Budget Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies $ 127,870 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 1,700 Subtotal - Taxes 129,570 Advances from Capital Reserve Fund 1,277,650 Transfer In: Transfer In - General Fund 105,100 Total Revenues Budget $ 1,512,320 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ (19,780) Total Gross Estimated Assessments $ 129,481.52 Total District EBU Count 3,886.00 Actual Assessment per EBU - Fiscal Year 2017/18 $ 33.32 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU - Fiscal Year 2017/18 $ 33.32 The maximum allowable assessment per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in Fiscal Year 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EDU will be based on the total amount of funds needed to maintain the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Operating Reserve Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2017 $ (28,529) Contribution to Reserve - Fiscal Year 2017/18 (19,780) Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2018 $ (48,309) Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #21 P1263 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time and part-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Additionally, this includes benefits available to City employees. Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District. Utilities: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity and telephone services, as required, for the operation and maintenance of the street lights, traffic signals, and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual Engineer's Report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all central services departments of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational District within the City's administrative structure. Capital Outlay: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include installation of safety lights and other large improvements. Debt Service: This item includes the repayment of interest and principal to the City Capital Reserve Fund for the acquisition of street lights and installation of LED street lighting within the District. Other Revenues: This includes other revenues that are not levied through the annual assessments that support the District operations. These other revenues may include: interest earnings and Developer Energizing Fees. METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Overview Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #21 P1264 improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the public lighting facilities, including traffic signals. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 commencing with Section 5000) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]. Section 22547 of the 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement". Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights -of -ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, safety, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and • providing for safe vehicular and pedestrian access for properties within the District, and • providing beautification and overall enhancement to properties within the District. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #21 P1265 The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the safety and visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District However, it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined; however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since Fiscal Year 1996/97. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Dwelling Unit ("EDU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land -use is converted to EDUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land -use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land - use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EDU assignment. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #21 P1266 Land -Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Property Type (County Use Code) EBU Value Multiplier Single Family Residential 1.00 Parcel Multi -Family Residential 0.50 Unit Non -Residential 2.00 Acre The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EDU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EDU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2017/18 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the street lights and traffic signals is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #21 Maximum Allowable Actual Assessment Asessment Rate Total Property Type County Use Code Rate per EBU per EBU Units/Acres Total EBUs Single Family Residential $33.32 33.32 3,886.00 3,886.00 Multi -Family Residential 33.32 33.32 0.00 0.00 Non -Residential 33.32 33.32 0.00 0.00 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the street lights and traffic signals is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #21 P1267 Vineyard Av N Hellman Av Archibald Av I Hermosa Av s Haven Av! Milliken Av Rochester Av Etiwanda Av A S East Av ,ts$ese s' eQ a � lfia 6@ gi i�gQ�9�,Ij1 $ W . '$oll tai; # �_ �MaL•s -n D 8 a -5i3= 59,�8$ [$ w Grove Av 4�a`3iY�a �i N11,I"as$a$ _ Vineyard Av N Hellman Av Archibald Av I Hermosa Av s Haven Av! Milliken Av Rochester Av Etiwanda Av A S East Av _.—..—..�..—.....J Milliken Av 1 ;..� s' D $ W CU d a: d CD CL �1. r �i .► 7 cLn N i ?� � 9 Carnelian St Oe l� Hellman Av Archibald Av III O I Hermosa Av I Haven Av Q 0 Cherry Av o n ID O. V v V ... j dv'f CT � N _.—..—..�..—.....J Milliken Av 1 ;..� s' Rochester Av CU d a: d CD CL �1. r �i Z" i ?� � 9 Carnelian St I l� Hellman Av Archibald Av III I Hermosa Av I Haven Av _.—..—..�..—.....J Milliken Av 1 ;..� ♦w Rochester Av �1. r all Z" w� W w� W 0 rq► V Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #21 P1268 ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2017/18 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2017/18 actual assessments for the District: Property Type (County Use Code) Actual Assessment Rate per EBU Total Units/Acres Total EBUs Total Assessment Single Family Residential $33.32 3,886.00 3,886.00 $129,481.52 Multi -Family Residential 33.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 Non -Residential 33.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 Totals 3,886.00 3,886.00 $129,481.52 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations There were no annexations for Fiscal Year 2017/18. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #21 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2017/18 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) P1269 ctchmeO- -#2;-2- P1270 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 8 (SOUTH ETIWANDA) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2700 Fax: 909.477.2849 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Lynne B. Kennedy, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Sam Spagnolo, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director P1271 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER 1 INTRODUCTION 3 Reason for Assessment 3 Process for Annual Assessment 3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 4 Description of the Boundaries of the District 4 Description of Improvements and Services 4 Map of Improvements 5 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 7 District Budget 7 Definitions of Budget Items 9 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 9 Overview 9 Special Benefit 10 General Benefit 11 Method of Assessment Spread 11 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM 12 ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS 14 Assessment Roll 14 Annexations 14 P1272 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on June 21, 2017, the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 17-048, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Street Light Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed the City Engineer to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2017/18 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay for the acquisition of street lights, the installation of Light Emitting Diode (LED) street lighting, and estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. Fiscal Year 2017/18 Budget Expenditures Personnel Services $ 25,340 Operations and Maintenance 61,120 Capital Expenditures 321,040 Debt Service 15,760 Total Expenditures Budget 423,260 Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies 70,250 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 800 Subtotal - Taxes 71,050 Other Revenues 23,640 Advances from Capital Reserve Fund 316,500 Total Revenues Budget 411,190 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ (12,070) Total District EBU Count 2,318.78 Actual Assessment per EBU $ 30.60 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU $ 30.60 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #22 P1273 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. 2. 1 have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefitted Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, I certify that the Annual Engineer's Report and Assessment Diagram included herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #22 P1274 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements, the installation of LED street lighting, and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the District for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the District by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the District. • Refers to the Engineer's Report, on file with the City Clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the City Clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #22 P1275 During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including the improvements, to the zones within the District, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to, the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area of the City known as South Etiwanda, which is generally bounded by Etiwanda on the west, Highland on the north and Foothill on the south. The southern portion of the District is bounded by East on the east and the northern portion of the District is bounded by the 1-15 Freeway on the east. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of street lights, traffic signals and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The maintenance and servicing includes, but is not limited to, furnishing electric current for public lighting facilities including street lights and traffic signals, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in operational and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, in order to lower expenses of the District.. Beginning in Fiscal Year 2017/18, the acquisition by the City of the street lights and installation of LED street lighting specially benefiting the properties within the District is proposed to be added to the improvements. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #22 Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of street light and traffic signal improvements to be maintained using District funds. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #22 P1277 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #22 n a taly�7a;��It % C q .IS r a x W Etiwanda Av • • % �• �: :••• : . • ••••• • i • I OS i•i t••• O 0••• ••• • • �� .• j.•� • •.. • •:• • :. • _.--. -.. .... • • �. East Av ; t� •• ••. r ". i • •• • . . 40 joist r .••t. ti • to (D : Ji .' p m a ..... r CO • r: m v+ m S G Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #22 P1278 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the District levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Fiscal Year 2017/18 Budget Expenditures Personnel Services: Regular Salaries $ 17,240 Fringe Benefits 8,100 Subtotal - Personnel 25,340 Operations and Maintenance: Operations and Maintenance: Training Membership Dues O & M/General Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance Utilities: Electric Utilities Assessment Administration Adm in./General Overhead Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance Capital Expenditures: Captial Project Debt Service: Interest Expense Principal Repayments Subtotal - Debt Service Total Expenditures Budget 180 40 4,940 5,160 42,240 8,720 5,000 61,120 321,040 2,570 13,190 15,760 $ 423,260 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #22 S P*k:':, Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection Subtotal - Taxes Other Revenues: Interest Earnings Subtotal - Other Revenues Fiscal Year 2017/18 Budget $ 70,250 800 71,050 23,640 23,640 Advances from Capital Reserve Fund 316,500 Total Revenues Budget $ 411,190 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ (12,070) Total Gross Estimated Assessments $ 70,954.67 Total District EBU Count 2,318.78 Actual Assessment per EBU - Fiscal Year 2017/18 $ 30.60 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU - Fiscal Year 2017/18 $ 30.60 The maximum allowable assessment per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in Fiscal Year 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the total amount of funds needed to maintain the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Operating Reserve Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2017 $2,031,462 Contribution to Reserve - Fiscal Year 2017/18 (12,070) Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2018 $2,019,392 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #22 P1280 Definitions of Budaet Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time and part-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Additionally, this includes benefits available to City employees. Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District. Utilities: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity and telephone services, as required, for the operation and maintenance of the street lights, traffic signals, and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual Engineer's Report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all central services departments of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational District within the City's administrative structure. Capital Outlay: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include installation of safety lights and other large improvements. Debt Service: This item includes the repayment of interest and principal to the City Capital Reserve Fund for the acquisition of street lights and installation of LED street lighting within the District. Other Revenues: This includes other revenues that are not levied through the annual assessments that support the District operations. These other revenues may include: interest earnings and Developer Energizing Fees. METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Overview Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #22 P1281 improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the public lighting facilities, including traffic signals. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 commencing with Section 5000) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]. Section 22547 of the 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement'. Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights -of -ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, safety, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and • providing for safe vehicular and pedestrian access for properties within the District, and • providing beautification and overall enhancement to properties within the District. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #22 P1282 The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the safety and visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District However, it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined; however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since Fiscal Year 1996/97. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The EBU method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one EBU. Every other land -use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land -use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land -use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #22 P1283 Land -Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Property Type County Use Code EBU Value Multiplier Single Family Residential 1.00 Parcel Multi -Family Residential 1.00 Unit Non -Residential 2.00 Acre The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2017/18 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the street lights and traffic signals is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #22 Maximum Allowable Actual Assessment Asessment Rate Total Property Type County Use Code Rate per EBU per EBU Units/Acres Total EBUs Single Family Residential $193.75 $30.60 1,198.00 1,198.00 Multi -Family Residential 1 193.75 30.60 1,057.00 1,057.00 Non -Residential 1 193.75 30.60 31.89 63.78 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the street lights and traffic signals is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #22 p+��47gg48 sgF � ON 10g ! aa i a : •3 D g 38f a ` Q}- 00 Eg [Nii;r$ J 1 3 Grove Av 3ui11�a94�a�� ; Vineyard Av A S S cn Hellman Av� Archibald Av ll i Hermosa Av I Haven Av! Milliken Av I i Rochester Av Etiwanda Av A S SO East Av 0 N CJI O m CD C CL D o a v CDa CD ;U a Cherry Av it - n f Rochester Av ki. ............ _._. Day Creek f Etiwanda Av P1284 Carnelian St Hellman Av Archibald Av Hermosa Av Haven Av Milliken Av Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #22 CO ,-0 c. r m CD C CL D o a v CDa CD ;U a Cherry Av it - n f Rochester Av ki. ............ _._. Day Creek f Etiwanda Av P1284 Carnelian St Hellman Av Archibald Av Hermosa Av Haven Av Milliken Av Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #22 P1285 ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2017/18 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2017/18 actual assessments for the District: Property Type (County Use Code) Actual Assessment Rate per EBU Total Units/Acres Total EBUs Total Assessment Single Family Residential $30.60 1,198.00 1,198.00 $36,658.80 Multi -Family Residential 30.60 1,057.00 1,057.00 32,344.20 Non -Residential 30.60 31.89 63.78 1,951.67 Totals 7.00 2,286.89 2,318.78 $70,954.67 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations The following annexations are effective for Fiscal Year 2017/18: Apn Annexation Date Project Name Total Units/ Acres Total EBUs PropertyType 0227-061-03 & 82 08/03/2016 TR 18936 16.00 16.00 Single Family Residential 0227-071-17 09/07/2016 TR19968 11.00 11.00 Single Family Residential 1100-011-02 09/07/2016 TR18966 7.00 7.00 Single Family Residential Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #22 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2017/18 City of Rancho Cucamonga Parks and Recreation Improvement District No. PD -85 Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer P1286 1�#achwjik #-;4 3 P1287 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 5 (ANDOVER) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2700 Fax: 909.477.2849 ��3W&60111114 L L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Lynne B. Kennedy, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Sam Spagnolo, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director TABLE OF CONTENTS AUTHORITY FOR REPORT FINDINGS DISTRICT ANALYSIS ESTIMATE OF WORK District Budget Definitions of Budget Items METHOD OF SPREAD Annexations Boundary Map 2 3 3 5 6 7 8 P1288 P1289 AUTHORITY FOR REPORT This report for the Fiscal Year 2017/18 is prepared pursuant to the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City") and in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act"), being Division 15, Section 22500 of the Streets and Highways code. Provisions for this annual assessment are included in Chapter 3 of the 1972 Act. The purpose of this report is to set forth findings and the assessment analysis for the annual levy of assessments for the Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD -85 (the "District"). This District, using direct benefit assessments, was originally created to provide funds to finance the cost of construction, maintenance, operation and debt payment of Heritage Community Park and Red Hill Community Park in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Subsequently, the debt has been repaid with only the ongoing maintenance and operation with periodic capital improvement expenditures of the parks remaining. FINDINGS Section 22573 of the 1972 Act, requires assessments to be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. The section states: The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. The means of determining whether or not a parcel will benefit from the improvements is contained in the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7, commencing with Section 5000 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California). The 1972 Act also provides for the classification of various areas within an assessment district into benefit areas where, by reason of variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive differing degrees of all territory receiving substantially the same degree of benefit from the improvements and may consist of contiguous or noncontiguous areas. As the assessments are levied on the bases of benefit, they are considered a user's fee, not a tax; and, therefore, are not governed by Article XIII A. Properties owned by public agencies, such as a city, county, state, or the Federal government, are not assessable without the approval of the particular agency and, normally, are not assessed. Certain other parcels used for railroad mainline right-of-way, public utility transmission right-of-way, and common areas are also exempt from assessment. The assessment for mobile home parks will be based upon underlying lot acreage. Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD -85 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #23 P129O DISTRICT ANALYSIS A. District Boundary The District includes all of the City of Rancho Cucamonga with the general exception of land east of Deer Creek Channel and the Victoria, Caryn and Terra Vista Planned Communities. All parcels of real property affected are more particularly described in maps prepared in accordance with Section 327 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, which are on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor in the Hall of Records, 172 West Third Street, San Bernardino, California and which are hereby made a part hereof by reference. B. District Name City of Rancho Cucamonga Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD -85. C. Facilities The existing works within the District boundary are generally described as follows: 1. The maintenance and operation of Heritage Community Park including, but not limited to, grading, planting, irrigation, onsite roads, sidewalks, parking lots, lighting, restrooms, equestrian facilities, playground equipment, picnic facilities, athletic facilities, and walking, jogging and equestrian trails and sanitary sewer connections. 2. The maintenance and operation of Red Hill Community Park including, but not limited to, grading, planting, irrigation, onsite roads, sidewalks, parking lots, lighting, waterscape, restrooms, senior citizens facilities, playground equipment, picnic facilities, major lighted athletic facilities, jogging trail, sanitary sewer connections and onsite drainage inlets. Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD -85 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #23 P1291 ESTIMATE OF WORK The 1972 Act permits carrying forward surpluses or recovering deficits in subsequent fiscal years. Costs for the district will be reviewed annually. Any surplus credited against assessment or any deficits shall be included in the assessment for the following fiscal year. District Budget Transfers Out: Transfers Out - PD -85 Capital Reserve Fund 116,800 Subtotal - Transfer Out 116,800 Total Expenditures Budget $ 1,362,070 Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD -85 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #23 Fiscal Year 2017/18 Budget Expenditures Personnel Services: Regular Salaries $ 143,340 Overtime Salaries 3,680 Fringe Benefits 67,060 Subtotal - Personnel 214,080 Operations and Maintenance: Operations and Maintenance: O & IWGeneral 118,910 O & WFacilities 2,500 Emergency Equipment and Vehicle Rental 5,000 Equipment Operations and Maintenance 4,500 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 130,910 Contract Services: Contract Services/General 289,790 Contract Services/Facilities 14,240 Tree Maintenance 19,120 Subtotal - Contract Services 323,150 Utilities: Telephone Utilities 9,570 Water Utilities 148,690 Electric Utilities 130,050 Subtotal - Utilities 288,310 Assessment Administration 152,220 Adm in./General Overhead 48,640 Other Expenses 2,960 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 946,190 Capital Expenditures: Captial Outlay - Improvements Other Than Building 30,000 Captial Project 55,000 Subtotal - Capital Expenditures 85,000 Transfers Out: Transfers Out - PD -85 Capital Reserve Fund 116,800 Subtotal - Transfer Out 116,800 Total Expenditures Budget $ 1,362,070 Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD -85 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #23 P1292 Total Revenues Budget $ 1,627,430 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ 265,360 Total Gross Estimated Assessments $ 1,158,594.00 Total District EBU Count 37,374.00 Actual Assessment per EBU - Fiscal Year 2017/18 $ 31.00 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU - Fiscal Year 2017/18 $ 31.00 Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County of San Bernardino, whichever is later. Beginning with Fiscal Year 2016/17, the City will maintain a Capital Reserve to be used for deferred maintenance and pending capital projects. Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD -85 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #23 Fiscal Year 2017/18 Budget Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies $ 1,123,840 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 14,000 Subtotal - Taxes 1,137,840 Other Revenues: Interest Earnings 14,480 Other Rental/Lease Income 107,450 Park Maintenance Fees 6,500 Sports Field User Group Rentals 650 Sports Lighting Fees 39,220 Other Revenue 500 Subtotal - Other Revenues: 168,800 Transfer In: Transfer In - General Fund 203,990 Transfer In - PD -85 Operating Fund 116,800 Subtotal - Transfer In: 320,790 Total Revenues Budget $ 1,627,430 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ 265,360 Total Gross Estimated Assessments $ 1,158,594.00 Total District EBU Count 37,374.00 Actual Assessment per EBU - Fiscal Year 2017/18 $ 31.00 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU - Fiscal Year 2017/18 $ 31.00 Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County of San Bernardino, whichever is later. Beginning with Fiscal Year 2016/17, the City will maintain a Capital Reserve to be used for deferred maintenance and pending capital projects. Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD -85 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #23 P1293 The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2017 Contribution to Reserve - Fiscal Year 2017/18 Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2018 Definitions of Budget Items Operating Capital Total Reserve Reserve Reserve $1,074,598 $ 75,770 $1,150,368 187,870 77,490 265,360 $1,262,468 $153,260 $1,415,728 The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time and part-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Additionally, this includes benefits available to City employees. Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District. Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Utilities: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity, water, and telephone services, as required, for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers in the District. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost of all particular departments and staff of the City, as well as consultants, for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual Engineer's Report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all central services departments of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational District within the City's administrative structure. Capital Outlay: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Other Revenues: This includes other revenues that are not levied through the annual assessments that support the District operations. These other revenues may include: interest earnings, other rental/lease income (cell site tower leases), Park Maintenance Fees, Sports Field User Group Rentals, and parking permits (Metrolink Station paid parking). Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD -85 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #23 P1294 METHOD OF SPREAD The 1972 Act indicates that assessments may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes costs among all lots or parcels within the District in proportion to the estimated benefit received. A. Definitions The District is divided into three categories for the purpose of determining the assessments as follows: CATEGORY A — includes parcels based on the number of existing residential units within certain ranges of parcel size. CATEGORY B — includes all parcels not defined in Category A or Category C CATEGORY C — includes exempt parcels. Exempt parcels are those parcels listed by the County Assessor's as exempt and/or which have an assessed value of less than $500. B. Formula The assessment formula is based on actual land use information contained in the current San Bernardino Assessor's computer files and Assessor's parcel maps. Category A: All parcels containing existing residential dwelling units and meeting the following conditions. Parcel Size/Range Less than 1.5 Acres and 1.51 to 3.5 Acres and 3.51 to 7.0 Acres and 7.01 to 14.0 Acres and 14.01 to 25 Acres and 25.01 Acres and larger Dwelling Units/Parcel 1 or more dwelling units 2 or more dwelling units 4 or more dwelling units 8 or more dwelling units 15 or more dwelling units 26 or more dwelling units Category A is based on the number of existing residential units. Category B: All parcels not defined in Category A or Category C. Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD -85 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #23 P1295 Category C: All exempt parcels as defined below: 1. All properties currently tax exempt; 2. All public ownership; 3. Railroad mainline right-of-ways; 4. Major utility transmission right-of-ways; 5. Mineral rights; 6. Parcels so small they currently cannot be built upon; 7. All normally assessable parcels within an assessed valuation of less than $500 and 1.5 acres or less; and, C. Summary of Preliminary Assessment Amounts Category A: The preliminary estimated assessment rate, which will be levied during the Fiscal Year 2017/18, is $31.00 per residential dwelling unit for those parcels in Category A. Category A parcels containing more than one residential dwelling unit will be assessed for an amount equal to $31.00 times the number of residential dwelling units. Category B: The assessment, which may be levied for parcels within Category B during the Fiscal Year 2017/18, shall be according to the following schedule: Definition Assessment Per Parcels Single Family Residential $31.00 Multi -Family Residential $31.00 Less than 1.5 Acres $15.50 1.51 Acres to 3.50 Acres $46.50 3.51 Acres to 7.0 Acres $108.50 7.01 Acres to 14.0 Acres $217.00 14.01 Acres to 25.0 Acres $434.00 25.01 Acres and larger $775.00 Category C: The assessment shall be $0.00 for Category C parcels. Annexations There were no annexations effective for Fiscal Year 2017/18. Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD -85 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #23 P1296 Boundary Map An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County of San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD -85 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #23 P1297 eft 0 Grove Av o0 Vineyard Av rn EP Hellman Av U) Archibald Av U) Hermosa Av Haven Av Milliken Av Rochester Av Etiwanda Av L.�. A East n _ a CO y s CL m nWi � a U) U) r Tr 'm � CL 1 Carnelian St Hellman Av Archibald Av Hermosa Av Haven Av Milliken Av Rochester Av Dav Creek BI Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD -85 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #23 Etiwanda Av' i y T C° 827 I t� 00 r cD Off. ' H' Chegy Av rn �• D 0 CO to O Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD -85 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2017/18 ATTACHMENT #23 P1298 DATE: July 19, 2017 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Elisa C. Cox, Deputy City Managek,�—P SUBJECT: Update on 2017 Council Goals STAFF REPORT RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council receive and file the July 2017 City Council Goal Update. BACKGROUND: In January 2017, the City Council held a workshop to review the status and achievements of goals set in prior years, as well as establish new goals. ANALYSIS: As can be seen on the attached July 2017 Goals update, many of the goals established by the City Council have been completed, or are near completion, as indicated by the orange highlight. Staff are continuing to work on those goals highlighted in blue. Staff will provide a more detailed review of the goals during the presentation to the City Council. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 — Updated 2017 City Council Goals Page 1 of 1 it a O � S X -0 N r a 0 C Cc 0 m D 050 c c CD o. -0 m D -n -0 CL(D (D d m O � N 3 9 < m a `< wOp CD a w (�3a oo° o n _-w v, 3• cl c o' CL =. m cr mmw d d o cn �w � 3 aim o -< y m I v CD C y O y n � (D CD w5 w 0o cn 3 Z F w (n �o a U)o C m O CD .w FDv o w a -• o m m 3 m a v a w m n o 3 m m M w c 0 rn 0 cn Cl) m m a CD CL U) n m CD w w O C:) m m '0 3 cc cr 01 4 (D d O. U) O O (D ,(D.. c L C 7 a c (c (O 7 O !O CD rr O c C -U2 O D n C n (an to y N � 7 N d � - a (75 0 = -4 Fro acro (D CL c m O w v a c Z 22w m coi•cwi c www ai Q< _ M. CD m CL �cc D� o 3 � 0 o 0 S �• CD o(D w 3] wp. S 3' (O •0. m o 3 o m N CD CD (D • 0 0 0 0 O C 7 Cl) •0 (fin N (D 7 y_ 3 L O N O •0 S 7 Z O S J w cn 0 — A c CD p• '•. (D (O 0• c <y a N C) w o 0 d `c O O O N O (D (n 0 N cr (DD (D tU) 7� (a < < •00 Cl) (p 7 O l o = cs i= o 01 V O O nn CD 0 (D A Q (D C N 0 U) n0• -0 C CD S cep j < O C, O CD 41 C o w y E y 7 N O. w CL S C7 Q y O. :3 0 O' N w Fr v0, � 0 0 CD o < < _"�•CD 0 o? ? o S Vl O w j j• --Iw S Cn `L n w w 0 T =r o o w (DSS oww_Oy .ccn)o3y am (n = (D 0 i j O 2 m o w v 0 3 ?. o. O• O 0 w a m -n 2 3 (wii 0 n, = w (D � vm �o-w wv c y03 N 3@ ER C w (D Q wm cno- (D 31 l o f3p rc w CL :3 N w CD N N o,4w 00 w 6 C_ 1 CA O. (D 0< Cn Z 3In 0 C C 0 O (D 0:3 - .. O O 7 co SDM j< 0= 7w CD 0 Cl CD 10 N:E O= 7 v 0 �l a ( M w V 5— N (D (DCL (D — m 7 O N a?. (D 7 O: = O V 7 W CD t0 (n .r m o y v_ w CD N w w= o jo Cl CD N w r (nE-V = 3 (D 0 (D f0 n Q 0 MS <(D <CD P) 3O(�•0 co" 7 w w N 3m cl _ ' CD 0' CD m rn w �00v w y@ w N cD CD =. w o w a 0 0 w C D m o 1 (o A SD � 5r 0 is Cl ? V f N O S S a C m 0 0 r cn m n O r V m M O D v a Da rDN a a a � � w ro�ff n m w o = -.11 cnD m c a0_uw � .0 _.0 • 33. ?v o>> snow m w a (o m e m (u a -� r-� 7 c Cnj6CD3 c o m m w w o m >j o�m n m w y m 2 �•ow o o0:1Laa 3m fDoms m=� w 3 m w (o ? a mol a a m fD w D> m S m not ° ov asou CD CD --.0 <ca ���� wm o �o���� a CD 9 a:)w < w w oo= o a m 0 w0 9) o w 7 7 u0, N C 7 Q CD n 3o s "O :3ro"2 =meow w L7 = a V w cns-o O O Er ycm Q O w ccnc D m = mo may w y cn n o � ... n Co m? m i d _. CD (D 3 M o m< o 'c r o m a 3 o O m aw' fD .o. a m M y o y w cn c o m o ma w o � S o 5 2 o 0 - w c = y R o N o = fD `D m<a m P- m w =• w o CD 'm �? n cn v o o3v m mo Z w w F CD ( v C O y C m w 01 C? 01 m J V S N a w w O CD 3 �CD =rm i d� 3m' w ID - 00 CL n n n 0 0 :10 n mav r- v 3 3 (nm w -n 2. y m O 3 IC 7 2. r.� CD a o n v JD 3 c to o I n ( m n c v a C m N m c a a 2ID N 3 m a (n =Cn w-000 D - .D 0x 5r SD 5(n9N' -i O O= m Cn m (D a v m (D d O 0 m m <aw (n p`Om w r0 V m�fn�mrm� ooc� (°nom a (p m m y v a y y p, 2 m ca (c w w EL c m m N m c 3 ow =t5 a m c= m y m m o c in y Q o w CDS. o L x CO CD 0 m m m p w M O C CD N n m v ° 3 c ato = a(o (D w x C w m O m E -r 7 O? N Z n y 7 (O CD CD S 7 3 m 3 w o o m a w a o n o m c m (a o m 3 1 3 SD -0 rr M o ; cn `o m v >my CS o 0 3 c 2 0� m 3CD > -0 0) '•o Ea c SD nmoc�woo:omD 7'.0 a Al o O m 0 0 ,� l< w (o (D o y vcy°�'��ow -0 CD ��mm_w 3 Q C- n y 0 a w< 0- -'o w- m 'C m o'D O< m v w � w a m 3 c v to SD m = y `D m m = N N 0 CD na3•o � �o m 0 3 cry " �3.am a myr CD -Co) ?3CD -o cCD CD v o °o o O � -Q 3 C =' O' o a w= a t c �_�� � w Q'O w� 0? 3 w fD W vi a O O y 3 o o m w< v c m 0 T (c m 3 c c o m n y cn cn oo 3 v 3 w 3 3� a 3 O. d O Q m 3 = 5r v 0< w - W7 m CD m O w O 7= o> m (n m a = m .-. D w y m w (O to U7 �' �• S? 7 C m (O - y= 7 !J1 Q C v w w. tyn w r co f m j. (p= a am 0 �• N = m a Cn Cr # a C y m m (� < 7 CD m ( CD =rCO = m = p Q =- y w 3I CD ac��0 W?<= 3 C =mwCDNmx,�ID CD 33m w 0 •p m n 0 O O wwc°,�m(�-n'�v�o�?y c3c�<'D'w�' voymom3C—) �mmwamx9.<-0�- �.' Pt O O: ,< C' • Up O5.. w 0 a N m 0 CD m O= m CD i7 y y y m .� -a' m ci 3 C m C O y NJ G CD w m ww,� p, mC7 o (o D m (o 3mc3o?�o w,� m= _ 3 y w Q y w m m m a c mommM<a m�3 -4 v _p : 0 M ?. m_ > j m m w m w to m w c w w m Cr m cc (a 2 fw ww-cn�m oCD <= 3 owa 3y(o�� m m i Q p 3 w i y- 2cc=iamox0o2 m w m Cl)c = m � w c �D��w� fa v=o�m�mv o 3wwo>>y3cD cD "O w O 0 w w o c7 o� z .� m w .y,. .n-. y (D L 2 2 c w 3 Ow > tu m m y (O a cc •0 = m o >� a a (n (n (D (o <. a y m < o m m w y a w o •O- .O-. m= N m� 7 (n a w w y Q y C w (O ma (O"D C ? (n y m Cl. m �. CD :3 0O I w w W w p 0 0 y m 3, 7 3 M (c 3= m A m 0 O= 7 cY m -� m 7 in .�' 7- O o y 0y v m m 3 w w I m Cr a v O n m x Zr O = 7 C, CO =aw 7 �m a cc y 300 a C m 0 O r L Z a m N O z m m CL pi O r v 301 a m M a V• O 000 m a� M a 0 O N 0 ' 5 c< M � o n p aw oT 3 y w y: m 3 c �' oa o ?aa w 2 o 0 x c 3 o ur ur In m o m o. m w o w v (D cn CL j w CD �f CD uCD oNc� n5r mo.(D o��� `z Z 3om(cy a o�om ' �o xCD c < a' o y ='O wm�� a(D o n n Cn N N So 7 C= 70 m v`c o CD x 2L w o p• c cn2 Cr ?c c;`< j in 'n m w O1 m a ycc o c c 'o �� a a � w �- w o.. m n w cn 7 w o o d N CD rn a 3 (D n n (O -� (O w o m o mn� 3. ' c< =3 03 = a wOc Z o� m ( m (n: Q . w 0 m CD Gi w 0 n co 0�+(0 n O_ �°�,3 Clmw6 c. e m m 7 v, O CL En O d w ? 2 0= O� (0:1 90 CD I<D C M (ND �< O w N CD CC o9c aO 0<o mov o < < a o 3 < (n mawo( 0 :3 03D o (D0 v: °O n (DM m Oo OC a F5* W a 0 O CD m C:h 0 G o c Z(D -. a w y Cw] y < c w O w >r ID CCD O O m- d p a cc �c a 5 o w o O o o c ocn c m 03 n 03 03 :;:3 'a o m �. 2 �. z n 3 t d y y y 2 tc n j -. ci m O a N (p (CD d o In m In w� 01 C? C?01 00 ((D V J VIMO v S D• Cf (D N O. C- c w m r_ o :3_w tmn 0 B m w.n 3 m N O N O N N 1 ((D M 7 OD co O o O p, -4 (D y 7 C - v, Gi DD C ID ID : 0) N O = 7< a O. 7 0 N a G m O < w� N� CD Ln. CD Op� 3 Q O 5 n' CD CD rT w (O (O OIC a 3 O O 2 m 3 a 7 rn > O j N O= n O. C O fA (D N ID 7 � Q d N> 7 O 7 dQ (D (D 0(o (D n C m CD o(p o m o m m o O n w to C 7 C w 01 ¢o y 7 a CD w 0 ° = CD ,� 0 2.m am � c w o a -(a o m o•c° CD no o 3 0 o CD wo w v rn n u, w � o oN m o 0 m ° D � < 1 m m O w n n O (D '� C Q O = 0 'O 'O 0) r o m o o or ID a 7 j D'mwN`ov,G) c� N O. O= CD C N CD to CD C ffl O 077 op m (n wacn CD O o'�m CD 6i c7 m w o 3 m c CD s 0 Ocl cc O F(D nC DD w 0= O Gi �� y c 0 N O j(p wR 3 a n (D 7O _ N< w (Dv c m3wa v C co o w=to co P m c m Q m m i T� o» (p U3 CD w a< c tc c 0 m vi pt n m m o N O. 7 c. o o 3 m j 'O o cn ID fC O (D � O ' C C a o m O O O O m O C v O ID < w CD (n v, 3 3 7 w p D7 3 M Q Z (CD (D CD V .�.. DJ D. O. 10 4 . Cn CD (D @ (G O. N - a C CD CCD 3 m o N o< 5-5 3 O O c y' N O' C m co> 0 i C CD m N _ N O. n 7< N p• m L Du �o>>3•c m m o w c (nno n O. aCDo- .ow w m o ur (D c O y D CD• .o>> o aaCD 3 w o 0 p c 'D 0 CD l<n 3M ..w_o m �� �a o m am w (on o w :3 C- w _�'» W � � w� � m m -0m � o Cn � w o v Cr O 0 n. DD p• 7 0 Er � CD CD O N C (o w (ND c'i O_ ? O_ W o (OD O < O y < (D o O 7 7 O i (ZD a y 9+ O. O. O' 7 C Ci (D Q' < p o 0 0 O 7 L (p (O fD o N �I �< -,a n 7 0 7 C o CL O m 7 0 CD W N w O N O d CD o d 7 O m j O aCD 0 O O. O m O' O O. n p p _ O n ,N-. x Al 7 _ p a c y w g C (D (D m w O D7 �% p a n TI O' w CO CD (n � o' Q o N 0 CD a (o (o o (p 0 3 w m o c o> S. w a v (an 3 =� m< C o w < y � i o o H 2 m a =r o C . o o 0 7 0 p CD p 0 N O• y j-0 w o a m o 301 a m M a V• n > a a J�lh Ca N _L 0:3 0o Cl)mo `� mm aim rrn� < .0 m w �o 3 w_3 3a CD� .. _ �D w v y 0 ?; 0 fD w °: m z w w > z p— CD D' w m n Tr N m N "O 0 n 3 z ».m ID ,� tom_ 7 om c D'6 @mm to O w� CD O N 0 �O O wwtj 7 CDD O• a0 .yam. m 7 n CD .-�•. y y M n o x- cn 7 6 E1 < t m 0 O — = CD C < to 7 7 '9 to :.3 to tp A CD ' O m C 0 7 N n 77 0CL CD O 3 mo o - Er@ w 3 CD C 0 C d N �'C 0 0 = O m.x0 cn 7_ N ID z m 0 o n to =r m CD n 3 o O p w w t=o O O o N jCD O .n7 3 n� m a o C to (D f� �. C !7d (D O fA w 2 w in C m A7 Q N v w in m 0i n M -0O'Z T f�n0 p CD o pw �� m 3 ym l w w 0 Nj 0 N v 0. CL t❑ .. o vi (D w m 1 C? m CD 0 A A CD M c o w 0 c O � m w 0 CD 10 CD CD m v3 �= w a 3 !C N=rN o �C o 0 3 o m;;W� w ; CL — w m (n 0SD 7 m (7 0 0 0 �, » z N a SD 0 3 v -0:3 w ma o_ vc c=a - � = rD rr -0 CD O a m> 0� = » o toO'a ca wn n_ 7 p N 7 Cl) N > ca > ffl t0 C t0 °n � C .0.. C. 1 0 d 7 fn X CD a 0 N A t0 O A m m N w 7 0n a co to O n o j c m w CD 0 m a 0 ni jo a D v 0 c CD v U o. y 0 m 3 v v n v O v 3 c ». N o ow0•-D'o m co o cmn m CDD f 2 Dai o w o D < wa0000 Qc� X• m m mm 0 m D 310Ui tcc�33 w oto g-'Z0N c 0 w v°i �o00m tD 0 0 �' D. m o p �3mmocDj�C0c 0m » o w< t7 N m m n m0:3 (1) »m w ^a to ci�w� EL 7 n O. I K to w p m m n. y m 0� o �. `< N �j n 3 w in T CD 7 V -• 7 N N t0 7 7 0 0 �'I y (D p O y m~ °' o w» w coo g N� Dpi `<..m�•. c, n j n (CD, c m o p 00 tS 7-0 O y m c0i o :m w 0 3 fD U3 g 3 CD CD OCD CL 3 �' m o 0 n -I 0 cDo m 0 0 , 3 CD w 5? 0 m 0 o- m w m � 0 N 0 m o` a 3 o c7 r 3 n� 7� m m a o mm 3 o a w T 0 y i na moa 0 w Dai Z o 0 CL c v a a° (� ^ o a< o � w Z CD Q00Q �•wwFrwDOiwaco(3ow 0n °: w 0 wDtscEr o �tnn31 a we<o w m� 0 2a 3 m w° 'o m _. » a m c 0 0 3 c w m o � ?� cD �. m t�n�, a c0D w� m p —•= w a m» to < Z c m '. ~ w -0 0 to 0 0 nca w y awv C FT a^w m w 0 0 0 0 m Q•w`�m-0 o D j m 0 f0 SD o w m 0) rr �N0 CL ? ? »Qo 5.w m i,Erm o �cc xm 1m ° Ow a m n cn y CL �� D`i » CD w �' m Q 0p, c a a y o N o m cD °i (� Dv 7 O O w 7 N m 7 3 m m N tc o 7 C 7 �' 0 7 j "O n O O O v to � to ODD j w t0 'm< r N c°i 312-- 3'cnn» ID m � m � n� w mvaa few �,-{v �0.w ° o 0 0 m 0 3 < c°i n 0 to m �=r 0•y m m m < »N D cn n O D w m m o m c f7 w a o� c n• o v c_ ci F. -0 v: 12 M C m Dv�tD (� DMcr0 a m '< off.=r0cn v w 0' c3 m t0 O. D .` c c- c w n c_""vT x• w N N C 3cDwomnn w 7 �m y j `< tD to m j Li `�. O0 C5 j 7 C 7 = v CD '< S CD 0 7 N 3 o Er Q. U3v_�.f0 D .3 w m N Al m 0• 0 (n w DN »» N 7 Nom O to -. O Oao to n L 3 w o 0 0• �•m m O p to w V 7 (](D O O v° n v Q to m x: N y ... c _ y c p O a w w IV ._..7 w T a m O. Cj N m Om 5aS n 0- a .taM O0 j cn 0 o 3CL a gw 0 n� w S 3 v v w M o to w Z w v fA 3 Co j w 0 -1 m viCD C p N N .< tmir CD to m0CCD cn C-) :3 _n s c 0o.o-4m3 n C7 N a � o o— D w • 3: -n.vma r?1m m m 11N w(D D co 0 0 �c » v m °. m C_ 0 CO 0 0. N n w cD 0 to to m a �. m 3 0 o w 0 w 0 E w» m 0 c 3, 0 CL 3 0 m a �3 CD rr — CD D 302 m Q a cn r a a a a a co -4 (7) cn F•ov w cD W 3 (D :Ev m m g m m Cf0 < vv o y n 0 0 c o cD w-DO D w,n w o 3 o o CL Er -0 � o. o v v� o o D 0 c_cc CD c m w �D w v c o v �sw Z �p �, v yv D o yaov,N w 0 ay�am mm��� 0 r.-fD 7 y w 01 W w Q 'p a 0 Cl) y n N Z Q Al < (n (D w "0 Cc SD Z, 0 O O U) w= O j 0 Tp O 3 f!i Q C m c O 0 T M C 0 A c c Q Ep 3 m p m in c cD cD w y o 0 °i o Co 0 c= y 0 w v07p m Z w� >je < CD CD wonon D y n Q' o m N `D ? 0 O O -. C) O w m m p w O n 'O 3 r v� w N w o?r'w C m�w� ? m y n O 3w« o? o. n a .0 o j m w R� vwi I v w w C = O1 Z m N y N 70 tcCn =� CD c w Q N o 0 3 m D' Z � .o C �o m o c NO W Ci to Z (D O Cl To ? � o C-) CD m Q wv < o. w ci �w 0� C,)tC C1 O� O -• O O C7 0 O. a y Q O C 7 w 3 °• w w cn vw O C �3 o 3 0 Er a CD CL 0 O n ow<o o c m -. w>> o`o m= � cD a 3 m w {c y y 0 w w (D M Q C 3 7 CL .=� �< cc CDD t0 w cc 5 w O O w V y c CD o c a (n U O y co cc (7 o CD 3 CD -r v cn 2 3 � � cc cc 2 y FF � C w � 2.3 w c w m m CDCD CD m c c N m p C co)<' y (OD O 7 U3 y to co O 0 m W CDN Q o o o C? of CD _ fD W 0 -1 V v V S ma c c c CD w n 3 w O Dc' N m 3tC 0m sm'O O 3 V c O V 1 v 01 .� .� md C A C' o a v 7 CD C �1 0 CL-v_Z _ A 0 (D a� C- TI w O c w cn N �< m m 7 D -1 C 0 M C n 0 o 3 O O �< 0 0 w En �_ 0 7 C O I N m CD m O Ic O 7 0 y ,Z CC O Cn N y 0 w CD (C �.a,� O y 0wm a cn(D CD G,: ?� (D 0 to p C y fo N v CD o. O m Q' 0 0 n O n (no 3 0 c O m Cn -n � 3 rt p j t CD N w a O C n 7 C a w a y ?' c 90 CD CL w m � M C o � o m w CD CD a n :EN CL O w o=a' c 3 a d 3 N :3 l< o O 3 1 . EF3 v C 7 7 w m a aco m c w y o to � N w J 3 O O CD 3 = •O N Co .. (D n o n X 3 0 m 0 3=� w C v_,, O 0 7 0 o D 0 0 m >_ > p c T r,) -on N m o N 3 2,0 ? N ,n a CD = y" w vo, rn m 0 3 en cn C C N Z� 7 O w c w .� 0 v c o ^ O (/, j' O �n o j (D m cc y 3 7� w w w» o N. i < � 3 a .O -O' CD c m a c A r•j -Fr0 'D x an• O a0 3 ?y m`PS<W 7 0 0 0 CD (-�Cnn Fr ? co c07 Q' < 0 o N O •O owo2 'Fr a 7 in m 35 C 0 'D x0w- 0 O. _ 0 0 5r 0 CD y 0 0 Con U w C y Q Q N CD a 0 - CD 07 � 0 (aD (D C] :0 �D -n T 3 -SD IT w m o< 0 Q•'00 cn y c 3 O C< w o N N O w 2 w a¢ 3 ' c Q �, o c m O= O c o m m N 0 0 (D 7 7 n C C (� y C (D 0= 0 0- � 0 f0 O w w7 � w� O O. C 0 cc N y "� C m 0 0 fD y O. N 0 a N 7 3 y w .Ca ? y W o. d p" `G N 4 O ID CD N N O 7 c �. a 7> O w (n aw O< p 0 ? CD _O 7 0 3 O Ci w 7 .Q� 0 y C Con < N 0 C (D 0CC Q»' 7 a 0 S ,n wf0 w 0 w CD V m wa o C� N 07 w D y c Qymam CD CD < w W ww m -.'D w o 0 3 0 Er CD CO m o C '0_5 >> o O w vi m y(D:13 < D a � CD w m Z d c 0 d o w w 0 a CD v<_ C? C m '- ° y tci_, w o w 0< �. �c '- w n � 0 CD -<-� n� �c f v y y w m o 070 0 c c c co y o 9 w�� -' (n 0 a x w f y y c 0 K o o o 0 m 3 °' c 'C ��� °'. a cD co � °i v co 0v�c`3:°w� ? CD _v, m � �-�c � CT 3 Nm:3 0 cm c CD0 o=r W CDS oa w� m 3mPLcD mC& ow:E 0 -K o CL ,n NO c w a a� Co ,n CD y C= a o w m w n Cn O W o= a p..00-. m= m N N 3 Er 3 CD N n j o � fm y a a N O. C v 0 O • CO � ^ w (D 7 C V 3 C CD O m� < su 0? _ y 7 N 0 w y 0 CD 0 c 00 3 zm 0 •`D O o `< 00 �' -4 303 C m C) O Vn m D G cm fD m 304 i O vw(D m n m fJm�� C x O m CD m co m' x 3 y m N cU CD w m C 'n p w 0 m o.=°y wwn O. ` C ? `D �• w m ma:) Qfo S O Q w CD a .. (D m m C fD D o p oi3– < p O m m < o ° @o L7 ° » to < a m o'° m y o m En y 3 w 3 0 m m m » Err CD –m W.w a3o cD » 3 w o m m o CD O Q N O O O CD ' CD oi CD CD v m 3 g m c 3 p r o3w 3�w o 3C7 Oa to � o 3 _. 3 m N C? 01 O1 N W W N <D Q. w n � N�o3NO o tc' C wvm m m d – a m c .)mo cn CD 41 a – � c o w 33 cr 0 a am »m ma m f0 o cC v w cn v °- O In UC ° o •o 0 o m w 3 n c m (D N 7 O Nm O N d � � CD 7 a o X c w w y a� 1 p m Er < a � 3 w o» m v m a 0�CD y a v a w < w» 3 Q w o m m T m 0 Ek C): �v w o COo-6 3 w CD w a v w 3 Qa o o= 3� �w 3 m o m a o w 3 ccD w aa<w m m �' µam o *03°mwQNaw mm O < w» _ N» m= o°c �m oc.oQ C m m= 0 m 0 N tcn O. w to m CD N N 7' g w m N O N 7 O 0 m w CL ' "' M o N C) > p CD ° pCi w N 5 cci� 2 w N C) co (!1 M m � ° C O N m O p O N 3 v, o O n• °- °- = L °- O 0 j 'O < 3 m rr CC CD m p O. N fmq Q CDD 10 m O V N O 2 C m i d j• p C w m m m C' CD p, "to (D CD »-'°O X w 3 N 7 �a C w . w� mow 3.°oc�'a m m �• CD M 3�cD CL wm w O O n 7'0 p 3 m m v z m -o M o a» c :u3) � C» Co w �. �. C) W ca a a m N a m U o CD a w< o w 'D v CD =_ » CD a m (D O W 0 E m p ^. w a m p !A Cm 3!oap» <�=3m6�mma=3= w awm cw S< W a M C wonCa o N om o U3 m°. m m �ay>w><owvmCD - w w 0om °cC o3 '°m wo. co o v a o c CD w D. CL m m Cry o y 0 0 cr CD m 3 w m 2. m 0C w 3 m cma 0 w o f m 3f Q a N m (p 7 v; o w 0 v, >> p 'c n a a r ccn c w ° w a o g m o y -o w aw �cnw O CL E; O 3a�o-<aowa=O 3<v° o o 5 n 5FQ•w o'w Sp �ccn m�c3�'�mcaowm v m m o o'cm CD C 3 0< c CL1a� SD' 0v w 0 m`p o-aco aw to`CDD��`_° W- 14 �oNcwo�ywNNccic°� w: N w R O cc i O f0 3 a 'CD N `QD = 0@ O N CCo a O N y Cr Z-< Co0 fp DD -V =r 01 3 O w cl O 7 m � Q a m 7 M m CD m m v Cr C v Dm omwr. v- mCDm? 7 ,OO CD CD O O 7� O O y m3ma�J�p o- <3mR- 0 CD CD CL m 0 x Z ° w �' m Co M CD C)? — <m m m fD Er to o o m to m c m> C y O M n O. CD W O. � w y O 3 p0 ,a X Qcr - w0PED�ciD�o(� –U) amm c m Q' ci car–im03•�'0– CL0 m m g m m ur m <°< o CD C 7 O < ai Q 7 cn 7 ccic N m m w =r j � y to 7 �' n <O 0 to c m o V fn a o m m� m o p D CLw A� w CD m m–Cl) a u, Q,< o w =O- m 3 0 o. W h y a-- O. n y? n 3m w 0 � CO C 3wyvMm3�wo o-Z°z 0 3 m 3 w y m o w m n n�oco3»��•�M y C y CD o• in ° w m o y CL m o 0 m w tnM a CD3 < °c 0 m cam =r 21 am K. aw c D 0 w m a o 3 a 3 in o a o• v- a w � co < »amm > > 3CD o m =3 ° Cr ci: w N :3 cr m *. CD ., y p m ° �• o v CDCD CD — co m 3 - CD 3 m m w p o a 3 r N o w ❑ am o w a a 304 DI 305 a m 0 a N w 7 Co 0 m� o w w w w m c m m< w 'w ?: w m CD Cl i m w oID wCDEr mo<3 0 0' =rn <w 7 w w `� w� ID 7 fn < m aw `, c_) O." w O w ton `G w m w •O CD CD = CD =,,a w C O Cr o cn 0 7°< 7 7 0v o o �v 3_o yt 2 CD .. 0 7 w 7 �f0 3 a oa » oono <om�� O< CD (D m o 7 w e .7.. n n �. a n w O CD o v vii w Q a — c w w N 0 w C M. CL c°i N w cc oto v CD °��jw< 7 o°CL 3>> N w o m c w � 3 m a y w(D W CD y y 7 0.7 oEr 7 w n N 7 (D a O w to w o m n n �-n v w o w w 7 w d CD c o w (o w va CD I w 7 z n (a y y m N 01 01 d w Ln L" ? N w S w M ro0 c C- v w n m 3 0 O (D Ulcr O j < O(p 3 Z. w (D 01 rn rn �Q- " 3 E» cn O G) m cn s D c A O cn cn O 3 (n A So w CL a 3% CD C c w o 7•w n 3 O CD •� O O w 7 cn T L S n c O c Vl w 7 n' (C CD03a w c c o awooG73 :,:)r E� w a 0. on cn 00 �� W o iy »a� a3 o cc y w 7 f0/1 w c T O— C° A 'p o (O a y n " G cn N m on 'O N N w y (»n oc a O p a N N w (p Q. o o v ocnw g v7'acnw o ? < w m o »<»w o-com w v=I:cn 3 °< p' � n ci a 3 Q vwi S a a(n 7 0 o �'w(wn`LD'ow�m 0 y owm3mo vc C w co m w_ o w (aw�"CDL o N a 8* m �� (c w ?_ a w CD C) EL E; C. �, �.wn _ (D w w w Z w Co cl Cr ww �O C El0 En 0 =wCD ID w W n CD 3 n m m m 3 �� w°CC0 CDw y a, _ a °w» o CD r< 7 �v 3 m m CL M° n� °i� w a. 0 w a A 7 (n w - 'rl o? m w° y �< x v (0 ° O O. 7 O 3 O' >' (O (DD N X w 7 m o Z� m�+,o 0 n w D y w 7 w 0 niv`o � o(o 0� ff-a-0 o o 7 w w w d CD N w wa w 7 O w 7 7 7' w v " w w w c C 3 7 3 7 w w 7 w w w� (D nnww7 •waw Sin-w0"CDDE CD :e wyCD N M. CL �woaov owv>>vCL wcy�y v G) CD w O O i �• CD 7 7 w n C. W CD n (» (D d O� 7> o� wmaow3 7< (D (yp o(cw�,aw3 %ywn°,D'EL w w w mw=•oa(cT a: U w (D 3 o>> m< mmy--r �mwy? a)0 w m c 3 ° w y N c w c y j w 7•Qy O»C n'O W O. c7i w_ a f O O N,wm w ° Ww ny fO 0 Q "O •p w= y' OO 3 7 w y _x N cn O7 C Co 7 w m w w 7 Cl w w O- to 7 0 a N (7A O w co boa y w m aEFo w< X T w 7 7 (D O w n�aa�.� CL 3 CO CD o (n m m 9 aw agy aw =' _? twncc w CD o O. O y w o 0 w m m Cl)w(G m ° CO n E' (n C (n - 3 CD CD w'w0 j C) (D " O 0" N w a w v cn W 7 xw w y �. d N C n y � U3W v7i mwnc2- :3CD 3o:3 v N g o ro o N o w o 0 o m �_ o 0 m w w n m m o w�_ ur w n �0 CD CC ° o(o a � my (O 7 o O, y a w w L0 OD (D 'O a 7 w w 2 m °O w— O p Vwi o a c cD w -0 0• 7' (wir w n w v QEF 0 y W o -°O n y? CD 0(p N w h Cr cr C- C CDr- LC7 E .6 CD =. CDw 0 w �l 6 °Q ?wwcw EN O D CL < cl C � CD c wO awN R!wwwCXD N CD ° (' Ul 3 c w , C w N 7: O• C y 0 q1 w w w? •D Z O Ul V iii a 7' �(c_ w» xR 0w w o> j CO w or o w v�mw" c j W j• w' S o y� N Dnt w (D CD 0 CC (n a-0 m 3 cD Err w =r 0) a� o CD 3 Ei Sir �n cp a O 7 0 00 ;,:r CO 7 w w w<S. �' w 7 w w Cl w 3 �U–F =1 wm C,0 K) ai (nn fes)' 7 o w 7 Q y w a o cc 7� a j CD CD 7 N W D m n m a m 0 a 306 a C m 0 O a GO V O CJI o mmow ww=ac =•°•r:w (=n< N tD 9m m ('D 'cw ana m w N O c 3 0� O, icv,0 = 7= 0 7 tO o m =to N 7= w m,w w = w Cw) a oD ?� Ai (D *a w� 2cD O 3wR—e N CD O m < °t o� w fD X w m N O CL =c y N a 0 N oO S w a °7 m o oCnm v Er , m v °�v v� m w v m�=�y� o ? y wCD < CD m mCD m w CD 5= `° m y 0 7 N [NY y 0 m N w ((a n = m N d S ° m '� N m w= N m a m 3 w C n o N CD Ci N 7 f0 c c c w fID (p (µ ° w d(O c. N O N 0� w = m �7 tD w< w w m m m a 0 0 4, CD CL O �� w ID °v a< wco o y �?: o c w a ,< o , n v v c cn � w o CD 5n D' o a m N U)i 0 T �E CD CD n v 0 < a < a (D O SD .* m CD >? �CO 0 cc>> v1�i Q° O ,< R0 O L N m N C? C? O1 Q N V V J V N d S CD CL v CD v m c = v m o am, 0 v = = C) CD NOor im m o� y_'3o 31C �Cr�Qm o; m m m F. o a_ ��C) .w Z O we o 0 0 c c C o= m o a m = y (o a O= a mto D to (o o m o ? m t= 7 f!1 CD 3 w CD a w S-3 m a fa o m a c n O n CD 0 m = m CE)(n N cc N w R! a a CE) w rn 0)_� C7 c � � U) o M. m o N CD m w =3 m 3=c °O 5 co =' =' ° <w a v=i w O N m o v v0 CO o a (D c o m w m wa n N r m m 07 :E m m m a w N to Co v m m n w L 7 o N m o. 0 c a o w d `° m a 3 w °- m w m° m' o ° m c '2 ymw 0 0 `° C Q'.aw Er NO S 3 = m m? m w o EJ tS S V m > > 5* 9 y O cn = O. fO Q O w m j n om. °S 7 0 CD CD d (D (D N co N N w? n n w N -0. (T = �N fD x z m m c C S r- Q O. (p O. w* (n w CD m 25- (n 7 N. m O (O ° f° x tO = ID a o r Q y c=i 3 'D w m w m= o o w Cl)� 0' >> j X O D 'O ` O m a l m= < . M0 o mo�� C O. O• n i_cwo�—mw(�mo O—.0 = N :E 5. m m m (p O. B O W (° . 3 N S y W j N N Cw is c 3 (D 3 N (D (n , O cD O 0 cn to m L o (=n m N to CD m" m C N (D O= .O (�, y N o t� O O= S `- N C 7 (D (D w a 3 f0 a N su r- x (� w COD N c 0 a< a 3 m< CD �' S _ j D m ci ° . 0 Cl mCD = C m c CD = c° 0 m m 3 m O (n" !D w _ a o y Or x O V CD d :3 n= 'O C• n CO p a w 'O"' f—aD :E .__..; o x C ° o mm to o M_ 0 (D N a to N n= w (D w m o '=" O o w- N CO w g �c w G m 3 ,G 0 = CD CD a 30 o m v m ° C7 w o _ w a t0 r n= o n ? cn CD a0 < o N Nw30O 'C N 'O N W '°O wwo�• SNwo'°• .I cn w<� CD U) = (°nw1m wow O v -StD�o7co(D� Co -co 0_ m phi a ('7 C='7 t0 m (p N J Dt � X m m m v O m = n c N C) m to m -' o ? N x 3 m N in w N 3 °' G)= w 0 (N/1 N (n ;r0io . w 3 � w= a = owCDa 0 3< CL mvmg�'�oo� 0 Al w m O• m= w w - w a SD o m y 0= in N 7 n 7 3 <P m ig m w 0'o a yto aw mem µ 3 y a w =-a a w c0i a? 3 y N E N W w 1 c w (D w w t0 N N = m (p a j v o: a (D 306 a C m 0 O a