Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2018-08-01 - Agenda Packet
AGENDA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD -HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY - SUCCESSOR AGENCY -PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY -CITY COUNCIL Wednesday, August 1, 2018 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 REGULAR MEETINGS: 1st and 3rd Wednesdays - 7:00 P.M. ORDER OF BUSINESS: CLOSED SESSION TAPIA CONFERENCE ROOM 5:00 P.M. REGULAR MEETINGS COUNCILCHAMBERS 7:00 P.M. MEMBERS: MAYOR L. Dennis Michael CITYMANAGER John R. Gillison MAYOR PRO TEM Lynne B. Kennedy CITYATTORNEY James L. Markman COUNCIL MEMBERS William Alexander CITYCLERK Janice C. Reynolds Sam Spagnolo CITYTREASURER James C. Frost Diane Williams Rancho Cucamonga City Council Mission Statement . Make decisions, and be perceived as making decisions, for the general welfare of the community. . Always work to improve existing services and develop policies to meet the expected as well as anticipated needs of the community. . Work together cooperatively to respect all persons and their ideas in order to develop and maintain the trust of the community. Reflect the community's desires and priorities by assuring that decisions accurately reflect the community's interests by fairly translating public feedback into public policy. . Enhance the quality of life of all Rancho Cucamonga residents through the continued pursuit of excellence and commitment to the City's core values and goals. • Set the vision for the community for the future. • Have a professional, objective and respectful relationship with each other in order to more effectively address the challenges of the future. Page 1 .A.% INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC [ UCAMONGA TO ADDRESS THE FIRE BOARD, HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY. SUCCESSOR AGENCYY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITYAND CITYCOUNCIL The Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council encourage free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the Agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council by filling out a speaker card and submitting it to the City Clerk. The speaker cards are located on the wall at the back of the Chambers, at the front desk behind the staff table and at the City Clerk's desk. Any handouts for the Fire Board, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority or City Council should be given to the City Clerk for distribution. During "Public Communications," your name will be called to speak on any item listed or not listed on the agenda in the order in which it was received. The "Public Communications" period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these business items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the agenda commences. Any other "Public Communications" which have not concluded during this one-hour period may resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. If you are present to speak on an "Advertised Public Hearing" or on an "Administrative Hearing" Item(s), your name will be alled when that item is being discussed, in the order in which it was received. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary bythe Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. AGENDA BACK-UP MATERIALS Staff reports and back-up materials for agenda items are available for review at the City Clerk's counter, the City's Public Libraries and on the City's website. A complete copy of the agenda is also available at the desk located behind the staff table during the Council meeting. LIVE BROADCAST Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and CityCouncil meetings are broadcast live on Channel 3 for those with cable television access. Meetings are rebroadcast on the second and fourth Wednesdays of each month at 7:00 p.m. Streaming Video on Demand is available on the City's website at www.cityofrc.us/cityhall/council/videos.asp. The Fire Board, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council meet regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive. Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, and Public Financing Authority. Copies of the agendas and minutes can be found @ www.cityofrc.us If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's office at (909) 477-2700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. Please silence all cell phones and devices while the meeting is in session. Page 2 AUGUST 1, 2018 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITYAND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA D1. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR ROBERT NEIUBER, HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54954.2 REGARDING LABOR NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION (RCCEA) AND TEAMSTERS LOCAL 1932. — CITY D2. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE NORTH WEST CORNER OF ARROW ROUTE AND ROCHESTER AVENUE AS PARCEL NUMBERS 0229-012-08-0000 AND 0229-012-10-0000; NEGOTIATING PARTIES MATT BURRIS, DEPUTY CITY MANAGER/ECONOMIC & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND DAN DE LA PAZ, REPRESENTING THE PROPERTY OWNER; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS. — CITY D3. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(A) — SOUTHWEST VOTERS REGISTRATION EDUCATION PROJECT AND LOUISA OLLAGUE V. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; CASE NO. CIVRS 1603632. — CITY D4. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(d)(1) — CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, DIVISION OF OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH; CITATION AND NOTIFICATION OF PENALTY, CSHO ID H2O40, INSPECTION #1281145. - CITY Page 3 D5. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE NORTH WEST CORNER OF CIVIC CENTER DRIVE AND HAVEN AVENUE AS PARCEL NUMBERS 0208-331-47-0000 AND 0208-331-40-0000; NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND KEN WARD REPRESENTING UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS. — CITY D6. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 5917 ARCHIBALD AVENUE; NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND LINDA J.L. MARIE WALKER AND JOSEPH A. WALKER, OWNERS; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS. -CITY CLOSED SESSION TO RECESS TO THE REGULAR FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY, AND CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS AT 7:00 P.M. IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS AT CITY HALL, LOCATED AT 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. THE REGULAR MEETINGS OF THE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY, AND CITY COUNCIL WILL BE CALLED TO ORDER. IT IS THE INTENT TO CONCLUDE THE MEETINGS BY 10:00 P.M., UNLESS EXTENDED BY CONCURRENCE OF THE FIRE BOARD, AGENCIES, AUTHORITY BOARD AND COUNCIL. Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call: Mayor Michael Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy Council Members Alexander, Spagnolo and Williams Al. Presentation of a Proclamation to Retiring Library Foundation Board Member Rebecca Davies. --- This is the time and place for the general public to address the Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Council on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Page 4 Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Mayor, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Fire Board, Agencies, Successor Agency, Authority Board, or City Council not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these business items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the agenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this one hour period may resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed. C1. Consideration of Meeting Minutes: Regular Meeting of July 18, 2018. 11 C2. Consideration to Approve Bi -Weekly Payroll in the Amount of $1,025,087.41 and Weekly Check 24 Registers in the Amount of $2,975,629.74 Dated July 10, 2018 Through July 23, 2018. C3. Consideration of a Fire Protection District Resolution Waiving the Collection of Certain Inspection, 34 Permit, and Special Services Fees for Fiscal Year 2018-19. RESOLUTION NO. FD 18-015 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA 36 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, WAIVING THE COLLECTION OF CERTAIN INSPECTION, PERMIT, AND SPECIAL SERVICES FEES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018-19 C4. Consideration of Approval to Set the Annual Special Tax Levy for Community Facilities District 43 Nos. 85-1 and 88-1 for Fiscal Year 2018/19. RESOLUTION NO. FD 18-013 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA 45 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING THE ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018/19 RESOLUTION NO. FD 18-014 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, 54 ESTABLISHING THE ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018/19 C5. Consideration to Approve the Use of the National I PA Cooperative Agreement with Office Depot for the Procurement of Office Supplies from Office Depot and Authorize the Use of Future 63 Renewals as Awarded by National IPA, to be Funded by Various Citywide Account Numbers, in Accordance with the Adopted Budget. Page 5 D1. Consideration of Meeting Minutes: Regular Meeting of July 18, 2018. 11 E1. Consideration of Meeting Minutes: Regular Meeting of July 18, 2018. 11 F1. Consideration of Meeting Minutes: Regular Meeting of July 18, 2018. 11 11 G1. Consideration of Meeting Minutes: Regular Meeting of July 18, 2018. G2. Consideration to Approve Bi -Weekly Payroll in the Amount of $1,210,557.35 and Weekly Check Registers in the Amount of $5,634,169.92 Dated July 10, 2018 Through July 23, 2018. 65 G3. Consideration of an Increase in Construction Contingency and an Additional Appropriation of 75 $90,000 from the Transportation Fund (Fund 124) for the Freeway and Arterial Signal Synchronization Project. G4. Consideration of an Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for the Resort Parkway Street Improvements Related to the Development of Tentative Tract No. 20073 on the North 77 Side of 4th Street Between Milliken Avenue and Cleveland Avenue Submitted by SC Rancho Development Corp. G5. Consideration of an Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for the 4th Street 8U Improvements Related to the Development of Tentative Tract No. 20073 on the North Side of 4th Street Between Milliken Avenue and Cleveland Avenue Submitted by SC Rancho Development Corp. G6. Consideration of an Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for the 6th Street Improvements Related to the Development of Tentative Tract No. 20073 on the North Side of 4th 83 Street Between Milliken Avenue and Cleveland Avenue Submitted by SC Rancho Development Corp. G7. Consideration to Approve Parcel Map 19823, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security, and Ordering the Annexation to the Landscape Maintenance District No. 3b and Street Light 86 Maintenance Districts Nos. 1 and 6 for Parcel Map 19823, Located at the Northwest Corner of 4th Street and Utica Avenue, Submitted by CP Logistics Utica, LLC, A Deleware Limited Liability Company. RESOLUTION NO. 18-077 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO Landscape 89 Maintenance District No. 3B (cOMMERCIAL iNDUSTRIAL MAINTENANCE DISTRICT) FOR SUBTPM19823 RESOLUTION NO. 18-078 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO Street 94 LIGHT Maintenance District No. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS) FOR SUBTPM19823 RESOLUTION NO. 18-079 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, 99 CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO Street LIGHT Maintenance District No. 6 (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL) FOR SUBTPM19823 Page 6 G8. Consideration to Accept Public Improvements East of Etiwanda Avenue and North of Arrow Route Related to Tract 18870-1 as Complete, File the Notice of Completion and Authorize Release of 104 Bonds. G9. Consideration to Accept Public Improvements at 8628 & 8604 Hickory Avenue, Between Arrow Route and Whittram Avenue Related to Case No. Drc2016-00466 As Complete, File the Notice of 107 Completion and Authorize Release of Bonds. G10. Consideration of Amendment No. 04 Renewing the Professional Services Agreements for J&S 110 Striping Company, I nc. (Co#15-060) for Street Striping and Pavement Marking Maintenance. G11. Consideration to Approve the Use of the National IPA Cooperative Agreement with Office Depot for the Procurement of Office Supplies from Office Depot and Authorize the Use of Future 113 Renewals as Awarded by National IPA, to be Funded by Various Citywide Account Numbers, in Accordance with the Adopted Budget. G12. Consideration of Approval of A Resolution Establishing an Annual Levy for the Costs Incurred in the Collection of Assessments within Assessment District No. 93-1 (Masi Plaza) for Fiscal Year 115 2018/19. RESOLUTION NO.18-061 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE -AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF AN ASSESSMENT SURCHARGE FOR 117 THE EXPENSES INCURRED IN THE COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS IN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 93-1 G13. Consideration of Approval to Set Annual Benefit Assessments for Drainage Area No. 91-2 (Day 123 Canyon Drainage Basin) for Fiscal Year 2018/19. RESOLUTION NO. 18-062 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING THE COST OF SERVICE TO BE FINANCED BYBENEFIT 125 ASSESSMENTS TO BE LEVIED IN DRAINAGE AREA NO. 91-2 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018/19AND DETERMININGAND IMPOSING SUCH BENEFIT ASSESSMENTS G14. Consideration of Approval to Set Annual Special Tax for Community Facilities District Nos. 2000- 136 01, 2000-02, 2000-03, 2000-03 Special Tax "B", 2001-01 (Improvement Area Nos. 1 and 2), 2001-01 (1 mprovement Area No. 3), 2003-01 (1 mprovement Area No. 1), 2003-01 (1 mprovement Area No. 2), 2004-01, 2006-01 and 2006-02 for Fiscal Year 2018/19. RESOLUTION NO. 18-063 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, 139 CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2000-01 (SOUTH ETIWANDA) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018/19 RESOLUTION NO. 18-064 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY 145 FACILITIES DISTRICT 2000-02 (RANCHO CUCAMONGA CORPORATE PARK) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018/19 RESOLUTION NO. 18-065 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, 151 CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING FOR THE LEVY OF SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-03 (RANCHO SUMMIT) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018/19 RESOLUTION NO. 18-066 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING FOR THE LEVY OF MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX "B" FOR 158 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-03 (RANCHO SUMMIT) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018/19 TO FINANCE THE OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF PARKS AND PARKWAYS Page 7 RESOLUTION NO. 18-067 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, 164 CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2001-01 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NOS. 1 AND 2) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018/19 RESOLUTION NO. 18-068 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY 171 FACILITIES DISTRICT 2001-01 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 3) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018/19 RESOLUTION NO. 18-069 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX RATE FOR COMMUNITY 177 FACILITIES DISTRICT 2003-01 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 1) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018/19 RESOLUTION NO. 18-070 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, 184 CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2003-01 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 2) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018/19 RESOLUTION NO. 18-071 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY 191 FACILITIES DISTRICT 2004-01 (RANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATES) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018/19 RESOLUTION NO. 18-072 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY 198 FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2006-01 (VINTNER'S GROVE) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018/19 RESOLUTION NO. 18-073 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY 204 FACILITIES DISTRICT 2006-02 (AMADOR ON ROUTE 66) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018/19 J 1. Consideration to Approve the Resolution Confirming the Diagrams and Assessments; Approve the Annual Engineer's Reports; and Order the Levy and Collection of Annual Assessments within 210 Page 8 Landscape Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4-R, 5, 6-R, 7, 8, 9 And 10, Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 and Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD -85 For Fiscal Year 2018/19. RESOLUTION NO. 18-074 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, 648 CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAMS AND ASSESSMENTS; APPROVING THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS; AND ORDERING THE LEVYAND COLLECTION OF THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2,3A, 3B, 4-R, 5,6-R, 7, 8, 9 AND 10 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018/19 RESOLUTION NO. 18-075 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, 650 CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAMS AND THE ASSESSMENTS; APPROVING THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS; AND ORDERING THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018/19 RESOLUTION NO. 18-076 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, 652 CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT; APPROVING THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT; AND ORDERING THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN PARKAND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. PD - 85 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018/19 J2. Consideration of Interim Ordinance No. 935, Extending Urgency Ordinance No. 932 for an 654 Additional 10 Months and 15 Days, Establishing a Moratorium on the Establishment of New or Expansion of Existing Car Washes. ORDINANCE NO. 935 AN INTERIM ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITYCOUNCIL OF THE CITYOF RANCHO 663 CUCAMONGA ENACTED PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65858 EXTENDING A MORATORIUM ON THE ESTABLISHMENT OR EXPANSION OF CAR WASHES, DECLARING THE URGENCY THEREOF J3. Local Agency Management Plan for Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems Update Supplement. 667 ORDINANCE NO. 936 ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, 682 CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 19, ARTICLE 28 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ONSITE WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS L1. Consideration of the Library Subcommittee's Recommendation to Re -Appoint Members to the 736 Library Board of Trustees and the Library Foundation Board of Directors. L2. COUNCIL ANNOUCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Council Member.) L3. INTER -AGENCY UPDATES (Update by the City Council to the community on the meetings that were attended.) --- Page 9 a M. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING CERTIFICATION I, Linda A. Troyan, MMC, City Clerk Services Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify under penalty of perjury that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on at least Seventy -Two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California and on the City's website. Page 10 DATE: August 1, 2018 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Linda A. Troyan, City Clerk Services Director SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF MEETING MINUTES: REGULAR MEETING OF JULY 18, 2018. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the July 18, 2018 Meeting Minutes. BACKGROUND: N/A ANALYSIS: N/A FISCAL IMPACT: N/A COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: N/A ATTACHMENTS: Description Attachment 1 - July 18, 2018 Meeting Minutes Page 11 July 18, 2018 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CLOSED SESSION, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS MINUTES The City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council held a closed session on Wednesday, July 18, 2018 in the Tapia Conference Room at the Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor Michael called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m. Present were Council Members: Bill Alexander, Diane Williams, Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tem Lynne Kennedy and Mayor L. Dennis Michael. Also present were: John Gillison, City Manager; James L. Markman, City Attorney; Elisa Cox, Deputy City Manager/Cultural & Civic Services, Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services, and Matt Burris Deputy City Manager/Economic and Community Development. No public communications were made. No discussion or actions were taken. D1. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR ROBERT NEIUBER, HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54954.2 REGARDING LABOR NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION (RCCEA) AND TEAMSTERS LOCAL 1932. — CITY D2. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE NORTH WEST CORNER OF ARROW ROUTE AND ROCHESTER AVENUE AS PARCEL NUMBERS 0229- 012-08-0000 AND 0229-012-10-0000; NEGOTIATING PARTIES MATT BURRIS, DEPUTY CITY MANAGER/ECONOMIC & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND DAN DE LA PAZ, REPRESENTING THE PROPERTY OWNER; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS. — CITY **DRAFT** July 18, 20181 Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Regular Meeting Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 1 of 12 Page 12 D3. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(A) — SOUTHWEST VOTERS REGISTRATION EDUCATION PROJECT AND LOUISA OLLAGUE V. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; CASE NO. CIVRS 1603632. — CITY D4. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(d)(1) — CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, DIVISION OF OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH; CITATION AND NOTIFICATION OF PENALTY, CSHO ID H2040, INSPECTION #1281145. - CITY D5. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE NORTH WEST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND DAY CREEK BOULEVARD AS PARCEL NUMBERS 1089-031-360000; NEGOTIATING PARTIES CITY MANAGER JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND STEVE PONTELL REPRESENTING DAY CREEK SENIOR HOUSING PARTNERS, LP; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS. — CITY D6. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE NORTH WEST CORNER OF CIVIC CENTER DRIVE AND HAVEN AVENUE AS PARCEL NUMBERS 0208- 331-47-0000 AND 0208-331-40-0000; NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND KEN WARD REPRESENTING UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS. — CITY D7. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA METROLINK STATION IDENTIFIED AS PARCEL NUMBERS 0209-272-11, 0209-143-21, AND 0209-272-22; NEGOTIATING PARTIES CITY MANAGER JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CARRIE SCHINDLER REPRESENTING SBCTA, AND MICHAEL DIEDEN REPRESENTING EMPIRE YARDS AT RANCHO, LLC; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS. - CITY D8. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 5917 ARCHIBALD AVENUE; NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND LINDA J.L. MARIE WALKER AND JOSEPH A. WALKER, OWNERS; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS. - CITY The closed session recessed at 6:30 p.m. **DRAFT** July 18, 20181 Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Regular Meeting Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 2 of 12 Page 13 The regular meetings of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council were held on July 18, 2018 in the Council Chambers at City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor Michael called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Present were Council Members: Bill Alexander, Diane Williams, Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tem Lynne Kennedy and Mayor L. Dennis Michael. Also present were: John Gillison, City Manager; James L. Markman, City Attorney; and Linda A. Troyan, City Clerk Services Director. Council Member Williams led the Pledge of Allegiance. None. B1. Judy Matthews made a public apology for comments she made at the June 20th City Council meeting. B2. Victor Trujillo spoke on a plumbing issue occurring at his mothers home and asked the Planning Department to look into the issue. B3. Mark Gibboney spoke on the North Eastern Sphere Annexation Project, asked the item be placed on a future agenda and spoke in opposition to current project plans. B4. Ashley Wysocki, Community Services Superintendent, invited the public to attend the Ribbon Cutting Ceremony for the RC Sports Center on Saturday, July 21St at 10:00 a.m. C1. Consideration of Meeting Minutes: Regular Meeting of May 2, 2018; May 16, 2018 (Regular & Special); June 6, 2018; and Special Meeting of June 21, 2018. C2. Consideration to Approve Bi -Weekly Payroll in the Amount of $1,403,030.94 and Weekly Check Registers in the Amount of $1,829,829.04 Dated June 12, 2018 Through July 09, 2018. C3. Consideration to Receive and File Current Investment Schedule as of June 30, 2018. C4. Consideration to Approve the Renewal of Contract No.17-143 with Mariposa Landscapes, Inc. for Park Mowing and Facility Landscape Maintenance; Add Bi -Weekly Routine Landscape **DRAFT** July 18, 20181 Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Regular Meeting Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 3 of 12 Page 14 Maintenance at Jersey Station (174)/Training Center/Fire Shop, with a Value of $43,950 for FY2018/2019, and an Estimated Total Contract Value of $281,700 Over the Six Years Remaining on the Contract; and, Authorize the City Manager to Renew the Contract Annually. C5. Consideration to Approve the Renewal of Contract No. 16-114 with Emcor Services/Mesa Energy Systems For Citywide HVAC Maintenance and Repair Services, With a Value of $45,000 For FY 2018/2019, and an Estimated Total Contract Value of $184,800 Over the Four Years Remaining on the Contract; and, Authorize the City Manager to Renew the Contract Annually C6. Consideration to Approve the Renewal of Contract No. 17-141 with Commercial Cleaning Systems for Citywide Janitorial Services with a Value of $30,000 for FY 2018/2019, and an Estimated Total Contract Value of $220,130 Over the Six Years Remaining on the Contract; and, Authorize the City Manager to Renew the Contract Annually. C7. Consideration to Accept the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Training Center Increment I Construction Project as Complete, Approve Final Contract Amount of $15,621,346, File a Notice of Completion and Release Bonds Accordingly. C8. Consideration to Approve a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Appoint a Retirement Plan Committee and Approve any Policies and Procedures Related to the Committee. RESOLUTION NO. FD 18-012 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO APPOINT A RETIREMENT PLAN COMMITTEE AND APPROVE ANY POLICIES AND PROCEDURES RELATED TO THE COMMITTEE. MOTION: Moved by Board Member Spagnolo, seconded by Board Member Alexander, to approve Consent Calendar Items C1. through C8. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. D1. Consideration of Meeting Minutes: Regular Meeting of May 2, 2018; May 16, 2018; June 6, 2018. MOTION: Moved by Vice -Chair Kennedy, seconded by Council Member Williams, to approve Consent Calendar Items D1. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. E1. Consideration of Meeting Minutes: Regular Meeting of May 2, 2018; May 16, 2018; June 6, 2018. MOTION: Moved by Agency Member Alexander, seconded by Council Member Williams, to approve Consent Calendar Items E1. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. F1. Consideration of Meeting Minutes: Regular Meeting of May 2, 2018; May 16, 2018; June 6, 2018. MOTION: Moved by Agency Member Spagnolo, seconded by Agency Member Williams, to approve Consent Calendar Items F1. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. **DRAFT** July 18, 20181 Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Regular Meeting Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 4 of 12 Page 15 G1. Consideration of Meeting Minutes: Regular Meeting of May 2, 2018; May 16, 2018 (Regular & Special); June 6, 2018; and Special Meeting of June 21, 2018. G2. Consideration to Approve Bi -Weekly Payroll in the Amount of $2,423,335.03 and Weekly Check Registers in the Amount of $4,035,635.94 Dated June 12, 2018 Through July 09, 2018. G3. Consideration to Receive and File Current Investment Schedule as of June 30, 2018. G4. Consideration for Approval of the Revised Field Allocation Policy. G5. Consideration to Approve Second Amendment to Ground Lease Agreement with Goals Soccer Centers, INC. G6. Consideration to Approve a Contract with Bureau Veritas North America, Inc. and a Contract with Interwest Consulting Group for Annual Plan Review Services on an As -Needed Basis in an Amount Not to Exceed $75,000 Each on an Annual Basis for the Next Seven Years. G7. Consideration of an Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities, and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Light Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for Case No. DRC2015-00991 Located at 8591 Grove Avenue and Submitted by WeCare Dialysis Center. G8. Consideration of a Three -Year Managed Services Agreement with Advanced Utility Systems in the Total Amount of $115,922 for the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility CIS Infinity Software Billing Platform. G9. Consideration to Approve a Resolution Authorizing the City Managerto Appoint a Retirement Plan Committee and Approve any Policies and Procedures Related to the Committee. RESOLUTION NO. 18-060 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO APPOINT A RETIREMENT PLAN COMMITTEE AND APPROVE ANY POLICIES AND PROCEDURES RELATED TO THE COMMITTEE G10. Consideration of a Professional Services Agreement with Geographic Technologies Group in the Amount of $51,850 for Fiber Management Software in Accordance with RFP #17/18-016. G11. Consideration of Amendment No. 010 Authorizing an Increase to the Professional Services Agreement with Pacific Utility Installation, Inc. in the Amount of $165,025 for Fiscal Year 2018/19 and Authorizing an Appropriation in the Amount of $142,445 from the Municipal Utility Fund for Line Extension Improvements Located at 12400 Arrow Route and Street Light Improvements Located at 9299 Haven Avenue. G12. Consideration of the Capital Improvement Program for Fiscal Year 2018/19. G13. Consideration of an Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities, and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Light Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for Case No. DRC2015-00797 Located on Santa Anita Avenue North of 6th Street Submitted by CRP Oakmont Santa Anita LLC. G14. Consideration to Enter Into a Reimbursement Agreement with the City of Ontario and Appropriate **DRAFT** July 18, 20181 Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Regular Meeting Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 5 of 12 Page 16 $239,910 from the Gas Tax R&T7360 Fund for Pavement Resurfacing of the North Half of 4th Street between Cucamonga Creek Channel and Archibald Avenue. G15. Consideration of Authorization to Relocate Newly Placed Radio Equipment from the City Yard and Cucamonga School District Office to the Top of Cucamonga Middle School and Haven Radio Tower Utilizing the City's Existing Vendor, Leverage Information Systems, for a Total Cost of $8,310 and Authorization to Appropriate $8,310 from the Cops Program Grant. G16. Consideration to Approve the Renewal of Contract No. 16-148 with Brightview Landscape Services for Landscape, Irrigation, and Parks Maintenance for Landscape Maintenance District 1 (LMD 1) Parks, with a Value of $341,000 for FY 2018/2019, and an Estimated Total Contract Value of $1,783,320 Over the Five Years Remaining on the Contract; and, Authorize the City Manager to Renew the Contract Annually. G17. Consideration to Approve the Renewal of Contract No. 2012-009 With Brightview Landscape Services for Maintenance of Parkway, Paseo, and Median Landscapes within Landscape Maintenance Districts 1, 2, 4R, and 5, with a Value of $1,914,000 For FY 2018/2019. G18. Consideration to Approve the Renewal of Contract No. 16-262 With Brightview Landscape Services for Landscape, Irrigation, and Parks Maintenance for PD -85 Parks, with a Value of $259,000 For FY2018/2019, and an Estimated Total Contract Value of $1,361,180 Over the Five Years Remaining on the Contract; and, Authorize the City Manager to Renew the Contract Annually. G19. Consideration to Approve the Renewal of Contract No. 17-140 with Mariposa Landscapes, Inc. for Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance on Haven Avenue and Foothill Boulevard Medians, with a Value of $243,380 for FY 2018/2019, and an Estimated Total Contract Value of $1,569,680 Over the Six Years Remaining on the Contract; and, Authorize the City Manager to Renew the Contract Annually. G20. Consideration to Renew of Contract No. 17-142 With Mariposa Landscapes, Inc. for Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance on General Fund, LMD 3A, and LMD 3B Parkways and Medians, with a Value of $935,710 for FY 2018/2019, and an Estimated Total Contract Value of $5,852,420 Over the Six Years Remaining on the Contract; and, Authorize the City Manager to Renew the Contract Annually. G21. Consideration to Approve the Renewal of Contract No. 17-143 with Mariposa Landscapes, Inc. for Park Mowing and Facility Landscape Maintenance with a Value of $821,480 for FY 2018/2019, and an Estimated Total Contract Value of $5,121,310 over the Six Years Remaining on the Contract; and, Authorize the City Manager to Renew the Contract Annually. G22. Consideration to Approve the Renewal of Contract No. 16-114 with Emcor Services/Mesa Energy Systems for Citywide HVAC Maintenance and Repair Services, with a Value of $392,630 For FY 2018/2019, and an Estimated Total Contract Value of $1,622,380 Over the Four Years Remaining on the Contract; and, Authorize the City Manager to Renew the Contract Annually. G23. Consideration to Approve the Renewal of Contract No. 17-141 with Commercial Cleaning Systems for Citywide Janitorial Services, with a Value of $780,000 For FY 2018/2019, and an Estimated Total Contract Value of $5,685,990 Over the Six Years Remaining on the Contract; and, Authorize the City Manager to Renew the Contract Annually. G24. Consideration to Approve the Renewal of Contract No. 15-103 with Siemens Industry, Inc. for Citywide Traffic Signal and Safety Lighting Maintenance Services; Approve an Additional Appropriation of $55,000 for Pending Work, with a Total Value of $1,038,400 For FY 2018/2019, **DRAFT** July 18, 20181 Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Regular Meeting Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 6 of 12 Page 17 and an Estimated Total Contract Value of $2,061,140 Over the Two Years Remaining on the Contract; and, Authorize the City Manager to Renew the Contract Annually. G25. Consideration to Approve a Month to Month Extension of Contract No. 08-162 with United Pacific Services for Citywide Tree Maintenance Services in an Amount not to Exceed $650,000. G26. Consideration of a Five -Year Support and Maintenance Agreement for HDL Software, LLC., in the Total Amount of $70,000 for the Business Licensing Platform. G27. Consideration for Approval of an Award to Taborda Solutions, Inc. for the Purchase of VMware Software Maintenance and Subscription Renewal in the Amount of $67,456. G28. Consideration of Approval of Resolutions Ordering the Preparation of the Annual Engineer's Reports to Initiate Proceedings to Levy Annual Assessments; Approving the Preliminary Annual Engineer's Reports; and Declaring the City Council's Intention to Levy Annual Assessments Within Landscape Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4-R, 5, 6-R, 7, 8, 9 and 10, Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 and Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD -85 For Fiscal Year 2018/19; and Setting the Time and Place for a Public Hearing Thereon. RESOLUTION NO. 18-051 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE ASSESSMENT LAW FOR PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENT LEVY WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4-R, 5, 6-R, 7, 8, 9 AND 10, INCLUSIVE, FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018/19 RESOLUTION NO. 18-052 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4-R, 5, 6-R, 7, 8, 9 AND 10, INCLUSIVE, FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018/19 RESOLUTION NO. 18-053 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO PROVIDE FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018/19 IN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4-R, 5, 6-R, 7, 8, 9 AND 10, INCLUSIVE, AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING THEREON **DRAFT** July 18, 20181 Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Regular Meeting Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 7 of 12 Page 18 RESOLUTION NO. 18-054 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE ASSESSMENT LAW FOR PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENT LEVY WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8, INCLUSIVE, FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018/19 RESOLUTION NO. 18-055 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8, INCLUSIVE, FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018/19 RESOLUTION NO. 18-056 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO PROVIDE FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018/19 IN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8, INCLUSIVE, AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING THEREON RESOLUTION NO. 18-057 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE ASSESSMENT LAW FOR PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENT LEVY WITHIN PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. PD -85 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018/19 RESOLUTION NO. 18-058 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. PD -85 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018/19 RESOLUTION NO. 18-059 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO PROVIDE FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018/19 WITHIN PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. PD -85 AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING THEREON G29. Report in Conformance with California Government Code 65858 on Measures Taken to Alleviate the Need for Interim Ordinance No. 932, a 45 -Day Moratorium on the Development of New or Expansion of Existing Car Washes. MOTION: Moved by Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy, seconded by Council Member Alexander, to approve Consent Calendar Items G1 through G29. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. **DRAFT** July 18, 20181 Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Regular Meeting Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 8 of 12 Page 19 H1. Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance No. 933 Approving the Fourth Amendment to the Development Agreement DA01-02 between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Rancho Mall, LLC and Rancho Mall NE, LLC to Facilitate the Development of a Future Parking Lot and/or Parking Structure and a Police Substation at the northeast corner of Arbor Drive and Cultural Center Drive. ORDINANCE NO. 933 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE FOURTH AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 01-02, BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, RANCHO MALL, LLC, AND RANCHO MALL NE, LLC, TO FACILITATE THE TIMING AND DEVELOPMENT OF A PUBLIC SAFETY FACILITY ON A VACANT 5.33 ACRE PARCEL (APN: 109053106) AND TO INCORPORATE GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2017-00969 AND VICTORIA GARDENS MASTER PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2017-00971 FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF VICTORIA GARDENS, GENERALLY BOUNDED BY CHURCH STREET TO THE NORTH, FOOTHILL BOULEVARD TO THE SOUTH, 1-15 TO THE EAST, AND DAY CREEK BOULEVARD TO THE WEST H2. Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance No. 930, Amending Title 17 of the Municipal Code to Revise Sign Regulations for Public Property. ORDINANCE NO. 930 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING SIGNS ON PUBLIC PROPERTY AND PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY MOTION: Moved by Council Member Williams, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy, to adopt Ordinance No. 933 and 930, by title only and waive further reading. Linda Troyan, City Clerk Services Director, read the title of Ordinance No. 933 and 930. VOTES NOW CAST ON MOTION: Moved by Council Member Williams, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy, to adopt Ordinance No. 933 and 930, by title only and waive further reading. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. No Items. **DRAFT** July 18, 20181 Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Regular Meeting Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 9 of 12 Page 20 J1. Consideration of a Resolution Adopting the Fire District General Fund Final Budget for Fiscal Year2018/19. RESOLUTION NO. FD 18-011 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A FINAL BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR JULY 1, 2018 TO JUNE 30, 2019 City Manager Gillison gave the Staff Report. Mayor Michael opened the Public Hearing item. There were no public communications made. Mayor Michael closed the Public Hearing item. MOTION: Moved by Council Member Alexander, seconded by Council Member Spagnolo, to approve Resolution No. FD. 18-011, adopting a final budget for the Fiscal Year July 1, 2018 to June 30, 2019. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. J2. Consideration of Development Agreement DRC2015-00118 - A proposed Development Agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and SC Rancho Development Corp. and Empire Lakes Holding Company, LLC, for a previously approved mixed use, high density development (Empire Lakes/The Resort) in Planning Area 1 (PA1), a property of about 160 acres located north of 4th Street, south of the Burlington Northern Santa Fe railway, west of Milliken Avenue, and east of Utica/Cleveland Avenues, within the Empire Lakes Specific Plan; APNs: 0209-272-20, 0210-082-91 through 93. Related files: General Plan Amendment DRC2015- 00114, Specific Plan Amendment DRC2015-00040, and Development Code Amendment DRC2015-00115. An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (SCH No. 20150410083) and Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program (MMRP) was reviewed and certified by the City Council on May 18, 2016. Section 15162 of the California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review is required for a previously certified EIR or for subsequent projects within the scope of a prior EIR. The Development Agreement is a contract governing timelines, terms, and conditions regarding development of Empire Lakes/The Resort and does not raise or create new environmental impacts that were not previously contemplated in the EIR. ORDINANCE NO. 934 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2015-00118, A PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND SC RANCHO DEVELOPMENT CORP. AND EMPIRE LAKES HOLDING COMPANY, LLC, FOR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED MIXED USE, HIGH DENSITY DEVELOPMENT (EMPIRE LAKES/THE RESORT) IN PLANNING AREA 1 (PA1), A PROPERTY OF ABOUT 160 ACRES LOCATED NORTH OF 4TH STREET, SOUTH OF THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN SANTA FE RAILWAY, WEST OF MILLIKEN AVENUE, AND EAST OF UTICA/CLEVELAND AVENUES, WITHIN THE EMPIRE LAKES SPECIFIC PLAN; APNS: 0209-272-20, 0210-082-91, THROUGH 93. **DRAFT** July 18, 20181 Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Regular Meeting Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 10 of 12 Page 21 City Manager Gillison introduced Mike Smith, Senior Planner, who gave the Staff Report. Mayor Michael opened the Public Hearing. There were no public communications made. Mayor Michael closed the Public Hearing. Council Member Alexander spoke in opposition to the project due to density concerns. Discussion ensued on ownership of the property and timeline for project completion. MOTION: Moved by Council Member Williams, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy, to introduce First Reading of Ordinance No. 934, by title only and waive further reading. Linda Troyan, City Clerk Services Director, read the title of Ordinance No. 934. VOTES NOW CAST ON MOTION: Moved by Council Member Williams, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy, to introduce First Reading of Ordinance No. 934, by title only and waive further reading. Motion carried, 4-1, Council Member Alexander opposed. None. L1. Consideration of the Public Works Subcommittee's Recommendation Regarding Appointments to the West -Side Districts Citizens' Oversight Committee. MOTION: Moved by Council Member Spagnolo, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy, to approve the appointment of Denise Garzaro and the reappointment of David DeMauro to the West -Side Districts Citizens' Oversight Committee. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. L2. COUNCIL ANNOUCEMENTS Mayor Michael reported his attendance at a Gerdau Steel Company Tour and announced that on July 19, 2018 weapons from the County Sherriff's Department will be melted at the Steel Company and put to a better use. Council Member Williams announced that she will not seek re-election in November and will retire in December. L3. INTER -AGENCY UPDATES Council Member Williams reported her attendance at a Local Agency Formation Commission meeting that morning regarding the sphere of influence for the Wrightwood area. **DRAFT** July 18, 20181 Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Regular Meeting Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 11 of 12 Page 22 None. Mayor Michael adjourned the meeting at 7:35 p.m. Approved:********** Respectfully submitted, Linda A.Troyan, City Clerk Services Director **DRAFT** July 18, 20181 Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council Special Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 12 of 12 Page 23 DATE: August 1, 2018 TO: President and Members of the Board of Directors FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Tamara Layne, Finance Director SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE BI -WEEKLY PAYROLL IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,025,087.41 AND WEEKLY CHECK REGISTERS IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,975,629.74 DATED JULY 10, 2018 THROUGH JULY 23, 2018. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Fire Board approve payment of demands as presented. BACKGROUND: N/A ANALYSIS: N/A FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate budgeted funds are available for the payment of demands per the attached listing. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: N/A ATTACHMENTS: Description Attachment 1 Check Register Page 24 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 7/10/2018 through 7/23/2018 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00008130 07/11/2018 KME FIRE APPARATUS 0.00 672,267.00 672,267.00 AP 00008131 07/11/2018 SAN BERNARDINO CTY SHERIFFS DEPT 3,135,756.00 0.00 3,135,756.00 AP 00008132 07/11/2018 WESTERN RENEWABLE ENERGY GENERATION INFO 143.32 0.00 143.32 AP 00008133 07/11/2018 HD PRODUCTIONS INC 3,450.00 0.00 3,450.00 AP 00008134 07/11/2018 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 336.00 0.00 336.00 AP 00008135 07/11/2018 US DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 10,793.23 0.00 10,793.23 AP 00008136 07/18/2018 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 1,100.00 0.00 1,100.00 AP 00008137 07/18/2018 SARGENT TOWN PLANNING INC 67,875.83 0.00 67,875.83 AP 00008138 07/18/2018 SHELL ENERGY NORTH AMERICA 22,500.00 0.00 22,500.00 AP 00008139 07/18/2018 TANKO LIGHTING 2,453.25 0.00 2,453.25 AP 00008140 07/18/2018 CALIF GOVERNMENT VEBA/RANCHO CUCAMONGA 15,595.79 0.00 15,595.79 AP 00008141 07/18/2018 RCCEA 1,899.50 0.00 1,899.50 AP 00008142 07/18/2018 RCPFA 11,509.11 0.00 11,509.11 AP 00392124 07/11/2018 CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL UTILITIES ASSOC 9,359.00 0.00 9,359.00 AP 00392125 07/11/2018 CANO, ZAYLIN ELLENI 1,000.00 0.00 1,000.00 AP 00392126 07/11/2018 CARTY, DIANE 108.00 0.00 108.00 AP 00392127 07/11/2018 DAISY 133.57 0.00 133.57 AP 00392128 07/11/2018 DELIRA, MARK 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00392129 07/11/2018 ENVISIONWARE INC. 1,861.04 0.00 1,861.04 AP 00392130 07/11/2018 EREDIA, PATRICIA MORGAN 300.00 0.00 300.00 AP 00392131 07/11/2018 ERICKSON, CATHERINE 1,500.00 0.00 1,500.00 AP 00392132 07/11/2018 GASIO, KEVIN 1,500.00 0.00 1,500.00 AP 00392133 07/11/2018 GRIFFITHS, VICTORIA MICHELLE 800.00 0.00 800.00 AP 00392134 07/11/2018 HAVEN CAR WASH 5,000.00 0.00 5,000.00 AP 00392135 07/11/2018 HUDSON AUDIO WORKS 3,000.00 0.00 3,000.00 AP 00392136 07/11/2018 1CMA 0.00 200.00 200.00 AP 00392137 07/11/2018 JACQUEZ, LAIHLA 250.00 0.00 250.00 AP 00392138 07/11/2018 LEMUS, TIMOTHY A 400.00 0.00 400.00 AP 00392139 07/11/2018 NEOPOST USA INC 452.69 0.00 452.69 AP 00392140 07/11/2018 ROBINSON, NICK 2,000.00 0.00 2,000.00 AP 00392141 07/11/2018 SAN BERNARDINO CTY FPO ASSOCIATION 0.00 100.00 100.00 AP 00392142 07/11/2018 SHARP, JOHN M 2,000.00 0.00 2,000.00 AP 00392143 07/11/2018 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 528.46 138.64 667.10 *** AP 00392144 07/11/2018 STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY 13,374.43 0.00 13,374.43 AP 00392145 07/11/2018 STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY 6,791.36 0.00 6,791.36 AP 00392146 07/11/2018 TRIMMER, PATRICIA A 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00392147 07/11/2018 TUMBLEWEED PRESS INC 838.60 0.00 838.60 AP 00392148 07/11/2018 VANCE, CURTIS 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00392149 07/11/2018 VIVERAE INC 1,150.00 0.00 1,150.00 AP 00392150 07/11/2018 WILKS, REBECCA 600.00 0.00 600.00 AP 00392151 07/11/2018 A & M FIRST AID INC 604.48 0.00 604.48 AP 00392152 07/11/2018 ACCELA INC 140,524.00 46,841.00 187,365.00 *** AP 00392153 07/11/2018 ALFORD, TIM 0.00 270.00 270.00 AP 00392154 07/11/2018 ALL CITIES TOOLS 0.00 40.00 40.00 AP 00392155 07/11/2018 ALL SOURCE EQUIPMENT 9,201.00 0.00 9,201.00 AP 00392156 07/11/2018 ALLIANCE BUS LINES INC 3,779.68 0.00 3,779.68 AP 00392157 07/11/2018 ALLIANT INSURANCE SERVICES INC. 12,477.00 0.00 12,477.00 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 1 Current Date: 07/24/2018 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 08:36:50 Page 25 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 7/10/2018 through 7/23/2018 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00392158 07/11/2018 ALLSTAR FIRE EQUIPMENT INC 0.00 684.00 684.00 AP 00392159 07/11/2018 ALPHAGRAPHICS 0.00 1,820.63 1,820.63 AP 00392160 07/11/2018 APPLIED CONCEPTS 536.60 0.00 536.60 AP 00392161 07/11/2018 ARROW INTERNATIONAL 0.00 1,196.52 1,196.52 AP 00392162 07/11/2018 ASSI SECURITY 0.00 9,645.00 9,645.00 AP 00392163 07/11/2018 AT&T MOBILITY 0.00 86.46 86.46 AP 00392166 07/11/2018 C V W D 89,772.45 1,477.93 91,250.38 *** AP 00392167 07/11/2018 CALIFORNIA BANK & TRUST 2,073.99 39,405.81 41,479.80 *** AP 00392168 07/11/2018 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 0.00 81.84 81.84 AP 00392169 07/11/2018 CHAMPION AWARDS AND SPECIALTIES 32.33 0.00 32.33 AP 00392170 07/11/2018 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES INC. 440.00 0.00 440.00 AP 00392171 07/11/2018 CINTAS CORPORATION #150 0.00 288.09 288.09 AP 00392172 07/11/2018 CLARKE PLUMBING SPECIALTIES INC. 0.00 60.92 60.92 AP 00392173 07/11/2018 CONCEPT POWDER COATING 245.00 0.00 245.00 AP 00392174 07/11/2018 CONVERGEONE INC. 7,520.00 0.00 7,520.00 AP 00392175 07/11/2018 CRAWFORD & COMPANY 580.23 0.00 580.23 AP 00392176 07/11/2018 CREATIVE BRAIN LEARNING 1,188.00 0.00 1,188.00 AP 00392177 07/11/2018 DAISY 2,839.17 0.00 2,839.17 AP 00392178 07/11/2018 DATA ARC LLC 4,999.92 4,034.81 9,034.73 *** AP 00392179 07/11/2018 DATA TICKET INC 6,734.25 0.00 6,734.25 AP 00392180 07/11/2018 DUMBELL MAN FITNESS EQUIPMENT, THE 1,996.88 847.34 2,844.22 *** AP 00392181 07/11/2018 EIGHTH AVENUE ENTERPRISE LLC 255.37 0.00 255.37 AP 00392182 07/11/2018 ERICKSON HALL CONSTRUCTION 0.00 20,410.00 20,410.00 AP 00392183 07/11/2018 EXECUTIVE AUTO DETAIL 1,415.00 0.00 1,415.00 AP 00392184 07/11/2018 FARMERS INSURANCE EXCHANGE 647.74 0.00 647.74 AP 00392185 07/11/2018 FEDERATED MUTUAL INSURANCE 5,706.65 0.00 5,706.65 AP 00392186 07/11/2018 FLEET SERVICES INC. 0.00 157.27 157.27 AP 00392187 07/11/2018 FORCIBLE ENTRY EQUIPMENT 0.00 1,531.70 1,531.70 AP 00392188 07/11/2018 FRANKLIN TRUCK PARTS 0.00 792.37 792.37 AP 00392189 07/11/2018 FRONTIER COMM 667.81 308.22 976.03 *** AP 00392190 07/11/2018 GOMEZ, LUIS 50.84 0.00 50.84 AP 00392191 07/11/2018 GRABHER, CHRIS 1,200.00 0.00 1,200.00 AP 00392192 07/11/2018 GRAINGER 3,220.60 1,029.97 4,250.57 *** AP 00392193 07/11/2018 HEARTSAFE AMERICA INC 0.00 4,540.40 4,540.40 AP 00392194 07/11/2018 HEARTSAVERS LLC 330.00 0.00 330.00 AP 00392195 07/11/2018 HILLS PET NUTRITION SALES INC 4,008.42 0.00 4,008.42 AP 00392196 07/11/2018 HMC ARCHITECTS 0.00 54,396.72 54,396.72 AP 00392197 07/11/2018 HORIZONS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY INTERNATIONAL 0.00 255,830.64 255,830.64 AP 00392198 07/11/2018 HOYT LUMBER CO., SM 0.00 205.60 205.60 AP 00392199 07/11/2018 HUANG, SIERRA 48.04 0.00 48.04 AP 00392200 07/11/2018 HUDSON AUDIO WORKS 1,400.00 0.00 1,400.00 AP 00392201 07/11/2018 INFORCER, THE 0.00 160.00 160.00 AP 00392202 07/11/2018 IRON MOUNTAIN OSDP 6,786.35 0.00 6,786.35 AP 00392203 07/11/2018 JONES, KEIMAUR 25.15 0.00 25.15 AP 00392204 07/11/2018 KNOX COMPANY 0.00 11,382.71 11,382.71 AP 00392205 07/11/2018 L E H AND ASSOCIATES 5,830.00 0.00 5,830.00 AP 00392206 07/11/2018 LANDCARE USA LLC 4,317.32 0.00 4,317.32 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 2 Current Date: 07/24/2018 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 08:36:50 Page 26 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 7/10/2018 through 7/23/2018 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00392207 07/11/2018 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 14,618.15 405.50 15,023.65 *** AP 00392208 07/11/2018 LIFE ASSIST INC 0.00 5,064.25 5,064.25 AP 00392209 07/11/2018 LOPEZ, JOSE 600.00 0.00 600.00 AP 00392210 07/11/2018 LUBRICATION ENGINEERS INC 289.10 0.00 289.10 AP 00392211 07/11/2018 MAIN STREET SIGNS 80.81 0.00 80.81 AP 00392212 07/11/2018 MARIPOSA LANDSCAPES INC 123,067.15 1,208.16 124,275.31 *** AP 00392213 07/11/2018 MARK CHRISTOPHER INC 339.59 0.00 339.59 AP 00392214 07/11/2018 MARLINK SA INC 0.00 162.00 162.00 AP 00392215 07/11/2018 MATLOCK DESIGN BUILD INC 320.00 0.00 320.00 AP 00392216 07/11/2018 MIDWEST TAPE 5,450.55 0.00 5,450.55 AP 00392217 07/11/2018 MINUTEMAN PRESS 1,660.42 764.53 2,424.95 *** AP 00392218 07/11/2018 MORRO, NICHOLE R 39.00 0.00 39.00 AP 00392219 07/11/2018 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 1,739.85 0.00 1,739.85 AP 00392220 07/11/2018 MUSICLAND 924.00 0.00 924.00 AP 00392221 07/11/2018 NAPA AUTO PARTS 9.40 18.94 28.34 *** AP 00392222 07/11/2018 NBS 3,771.85 0.00 3,771.85 AP 00392223 07/11/2018 O S T S INC 4,006.09 0.00 4,006.09 AP 00392224 07/11/2018 ONWARD ENGINEERING 14,928.00 0.00 14,928.00 AP 00392225 07/11/2018 PACIFIC PREMIER BANK 0.00 7,274.85 7,274.85 AP 00392226 07/11/2018 PATTON SALES CORP 0.00 174.95 174.95 AP 00392227 07/11/2018 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 454.79 0.00 454.79 AP 00392228 07/11/2018 PETRIVELLI, GINO 0.00 8.99 8.99 AP 00392229 07/11/2018 PRISTINE UNIFORMS LLC 0.00 415.80 415.80 AP 00392230 07/11/2018 PSA PRINT GROUP 77.58 0.00 77.58 AP 00392231 07/11/2018 PW GILLIBRAND INC 3,411.87 0.00 3,411.87 AP 00392232 07/11/2018 QUALITY CODE PUBLISHING 736.15 0.00 736.15 AP 00392233 07/11/2018 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 8.00 0.00 8.00 AP 00392234 07/11/2018 RC CONSTRUCTION SERVICES INC 0.00 138,222.07 138,222.07 AP 00392235 07/11/2018 REYNOLDS BUICK 905.52 0.00 905.52 AP 00392236 07/11/2018 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 46,267.18 12,226.80 58,493.98 *** AP 00392237 07/11/2018 SALAZAR, NATALIE 48.96 0.00 48.96 AP 00392238 07/11/2018 SAN ANTONIO REGIONAL HOSPITAL 0.00 2,321.00 2,321.00 AP 00392239 07/11/2018 SAUSEDA, ANA 2,300.00 0.00 2,300.00 AP 00392240 07/11/2018 SC FUELS 24,120.61 0.00 24,120.61 AP 00392241 07/11/2018 SHEAKLEY PENSION ADMINISTRATION 383.15 0.00 383.15 AP 00392242 07/11/2018 SHEAKLEY PENSION ADMINISTRATION 0.00 175.65 175.65 AP 00392243 07/11/2018 SHRED PROS 623.00 0.00 623.00 AP 00392244 07/11/2018 SIGN SHOP, THE 0.00 78.40 78.40 AP 00392245 07/11/2018 SMITH, MICHAEL 62.18 0.00 62.18 AP 00392246 07/11/2018 SMITH, VALERIE 150.00 0.00 150.00 AP 00392247 07/11/2018 SOUTH COAST AQMD 0.00 131.79 131.79 AP 00392248 07/11/2018 SOUTH COAST AQMD 0.00 135.04 135.04 AP 00392253 07/11/2018 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 26,875.50 2,266.56 29,142.06 *** AP 00392254 07/11/2018 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 42.89 0.00 42.89 AP 00392255 07/11/2018 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 740.99 0.00 740.99 AP 00392256 07/11/2018 STATE CONTROLLER'S OFFICE 2,467.34 0.00 2,467.34 AP 00392257 07/11/2018 STERLING COFFEE SERVICE 1,294.17 0.00 1,294.17 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 3 Current Date: 07/24/2018 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 08:36:50 Page 27 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 7/10/2018 through 7/23/2018 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00392258 07/11/2018 STORAGE CONTAINER.COM 198.00 0.00 198.00 AP 00392259 07/11/2018 STROHMAN, WILLIAM F 2,200.00 0.00 2,200.00 AP 00392260 07/11/2018 SWIFTY SIGN 0.00 129.30 129.30 AP 00392261 07/11/2018 TICKET ENVELOPE COMPANY 720.00 0.00 720.00 AP 00392262 07/11/2018 TORGA ELECTRIC 61,104.00 0.00 61,104.00 AP 00392263 07/11/2018 TOVEY/SHULTZ CONSTRUCTION INC 33,744.42 712,892.05 746,636.47 *** AP 00392264 07/11/2018 TRIMARK ASSOCIATES INC 2,136.00 0.00 2,136.00 AP 00392265 07/11/2018 TRINITY EQUIPMENT RENTALS 1,761.99 0.00 1,761.99 AP 00392266 07/11/2018 UNITED SITE SERVICES OF CA INC 281.34 0.00 281.34 AP 00392267 07/11/2018 UPS 136.52 0.00 136.52 AP 00392268 07/11/2018 UTILIQUEST 1,089.08 0.00 1,089.08 AP 00392269 07/11/2018 VERIZON 23.80 0.00 23.80 AP 00392270 07/11/2018 VICTOR MEDICAL COMPANY 7,969.68 0.00 7,969.68 AP 00392271 07/11/2018 VILLALOBOS, KHRYSTYNE 15.00 0.00 15.00 AP 00392272 07/11/2018 VORTEX INDUSTRIES INC 538.77 0.00 538.77 AP 00392273 07/11/2018 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 211.97 0.00 211.97 AP 00392274 07/11/2018 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 1,122.79 0.00 1,122.79 AP 00392275 07/11/2018 WESTERN UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCE 925.00 0.00 925.00 AP 00392276 07/11/2018 WILBUR-ELLIS COMPANY 2,679.63 0.00 2,679.63 AP 00392277 07/11/2018 WOMEN LEADING GOVERNMENT 195.00 0.00 195.00 AP 00392278 07/11/2018 XEROX CORPORATION 1,260.24 0.00 1,260.24 AP 00392279 07/11/2018 YERO, ART 2,300.00 0.00 2,300.00 AP 00392280 07/11/2018 ZOETIS US LLC 2,088.45 0.00 2,088.45 AP 00392281 07/12/2018 ABC LOCKSMITHS 2,633.54 0.00 2,633.54 AP 00392286 07/12/2018 BRODART BOOKS 11,937.99 0.00 11,937.99 AP 00392287 07/12/2018 CALSENSE 847.09 0.00 847.09 AP 00392288 07/12/2018 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 397.64 0.00 397.64 AP 00392289 07/12/2018 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 201.87 0.00 201.87 AP 00392290 07/12/2018 FORD OF UPLAND INC 1,939.10 0.00 1,939.10 AP 00392291 07/12/2018 GENERATOR SERVICES CO 3,961.88 0.00 3,961.88 AP 00392292 07/12/2018 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 1,548.87 0.00 1,548.87 AP 00392293 07/12/2018 LIMS AUTO INC 65.13 0.00 65.13 AP 00392294 07/12/2018 OFFICE DEPOT 4,778.22 0.00 4,778.22 AP 00392295 07/12/2018 ORKIN PEST CONTROL 245.02 0.00 245.02 AP 00392296 07/12/2018 SAFETY KLEEN SYSTEMS INC 188.56 0.00 188.56 AP 00392297 07/12/2018 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 2,855.29 0.00 2,855.29 AP 00392298 07/12/2018 SNAP ON INDUSTRIAL 48.49 0.00 48.49 AP 00392299 07/12/2018 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS 964.06 0.00 964.06 AP 00392300 07/12/2018 VISTA PAINT 1,474.97 0.00 1,474.97 AP 00392301 07/12/2018 BIBLIOTHECA LLC 11,280.00 0.00 11,280.00 AP 00392302 07/12/2018 DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 305.99 0.00 305.99 AP 00392303 07/12/2018 DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 277.79 0.00 277.79 AP 00392304 07/12/2018 DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 1,883.86 0.00 1,883.86 AP 00392305 07/12/2018 FIRE ETC. 0.00 1,284.23 1,284.23 AP 00392306 07/12/2018 LATREACE, RAINEY 392.00 0.00 392.00 AP 00392307 07/18/2018 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 1,165.37 0.00 1,165.37 AP 00392308 07/18/2018 ABLE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 2,011.35 0.00 2,011.35 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 4 Current Date: 07/24/2018 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 08:36:50 Page 28 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 7/10/2018 through 7/23/2018 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00392309 07/18/2018 ACCELA INC 2,500.00 0.00 2,500.00 AP 00392310 07/18/2018 ADVANCED CHEMICAL TRANSPORT 1,408.00 0.00 1,408.00 AP 00392311 07/18/2018 ALBERT GROVER & ASSOCIATES 9,300.00 0.00 9,300.00 AP 00392312 07/18/2018 ALCORN, RICHARD 20.00 0.00 20.00 AP 00392313 07/18/2018 ALL CITIES TOOLS 691.21 0.00 691.21 AP 00392314 07/18/2018 ALLSTAR FIRE EQUIPMENT INC 0.00 4,699.74 4,699.74 AP 00392315 07/18/2018 ALPHAGRAPHICS 528.87 0.00 528.87 AP 00392316 07/18/2018 ALVARADO, MARIA 117.01 0.00 117.01 AP 00392317 07/18/2018 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 0.00 435.00 435.00 AP 00392318 07/18/2018 ASSI SECURITY 165.00 0.00 165.00 AP 00392319 07/18/2018 ASUNCION, JHONALEE 27.25 0.00 27.25 AP 00392320 07/18/2018 ATTAALIA, JAKLIN, A. 230.00 0.00 230.00 AP 00392321 07/18/2018 AUFBAU CORPORATION 11,254.00 0.00 11,254.00 AP 00392322 07/18/2018 AUTO AND RV SPECIALISTS INC. 171.47 0.00 171.47 AP 00392323 07/18/2018 BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, THE 1,750.00 0.00 1,750.00 AP 00392324 07/18/2018 BARTEL ASSOCIATES LLC 0.00 1,925.00 1,925.00 AP 00392325 07/18/2018 BERRY, SANDRA ELLEN 94.00 0.00 94.00 AP 00392326 07/18/2018 BEST BEST AND KRIEGER 292.50 0.00 292.50 AP 00392327 07/18/2018 BRAUN BLAISING SMITH WYNNE P.C. 62.95 0.00 62.95 AP 00392328 07/18/2018 CAIN, RUTH 110.38 0.00 110.38 AP 00392329 07/18/2018 CALIFORNIA SHOPPING CART RETRIEVAL CORP 915.00 0.00 915.00 AP 00392330 07/18/2018 CAMERON WELDING SUPPLY 94.71 0.00 94.71 AP 00392331 07/18/2018 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 6.34 0.00 6.34 AP 00392332 07/18/2018 CCS ORANGE COUNTY JANITORIAL INC. 4,520.76 0.00 4,520.76 AP 00392333 07/18/2018 CERVANTES, MIGUEL 0.00 270.00 270.00 AP 00392334 07/18/2018 CINTAS CORPORATION #150 1,512.70 223.81 1,736.51 *** AP 00392335 07/18/2018 CLEAN OUT SOURCE 90.00 0.00 90.00 AP 00392336 07/18/2018 COLEY, JASON S. 10.00 0.00 10.00 AP 00392337 07/18/2018 CORELOGIC SOLUTIONS LLC 257.50 0.00 257.50 AP 00392338 07/18/2018 CORODATA MEDIA STORAGE INC 992.10 0.00 992.10 AP 00392339 07/18/2018 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 2,414.21 0.00 2,414.21 AP 00392340 07/18/2018 DAKTRONICS INC 294.38 0.00 294.38 AP 00392341 07/18/2018 EMBROIDME 145.35 0.00 145.35 AP 00392342 07/18/2018 ENNIS PAINT INC. 1,454.63 0.00 1,454.63 AP 00392343 07/18/2018 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 56.34 0.00 56.34 AP 00392344 07/18/2018 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 74.86 0.00 74.86 AP 00392345 07/18/2018 GAAL, JULIE 23.71 0.00 23.71 AP 00392346 07/18/2018 GEORGE HILLS COMPANY 1,079.00 0.00 1,079.00 AP 00392347 07/18/2018 GRAPHICS FACTORY INC. 800.58 0.00 800.58 AP 00392348 07/18/2018 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 1,114.85 0.00 1,114.85 AP 00392349 07/18/2018 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO 3,259.44 0.00 3,259.44 AP 00392350 07/18/2018 HERITAGE EDUCATION GROUP 758.00 0.00 758.00 AP 00392351 07/18/2018 HI WAY SAFETY INC 972.78 0.00 972.78 AP 00392352 07/18/2018 HOLE PUNCH DESIGN 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00392353 07/18/2018 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 645 2,131.74 0.00 2,131.74 AP 00392354 07/18/2018 HOUSE OF RUTH 1,117.63 0.00 1,117.63 AP 00392355 07/18/2018 HOUSE OF RUTH 804.58 0.00 804.58 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 5 Current Date: 07/24/2018 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 08:36:50 Page 29 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 7/10/2018 through 7/23/2018 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00392356 07/18/2018 IDEXX DISTRIBUTION INC 4,883.14 0.00 4,883.14 AP 00392357 07/18/2018 IMEG CORP 24,900.00 0.00 24,900.00 AP 00392358 07/18/2018 INLAND VALLEY EMERGENCY PET CLINIC 1,794.50 0.00 1,794.50 AP 00392359 07/18/2018 JACKS URBAN EATS 118.70 0.00 118.70 AP 00392360 07/18/2018 KC RAPID EDGE INC 359.00 0.00 359.00 AP 00392361 07/18/2018 KNIGHT, AMANDA 49.60 0.00 49.60 AP 00392362 07/18/2018 KVAC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES INC 781.85 0.00 781.85 AP 00392363 07/18/2018 LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC. 4,047.09 0.00 4,047.09 AP 00392364 07/18/2018 LINARES, RUDY 200.00 0.00 200.00 AP 00392365 07/18/2018 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 9,015.00 0.00 9,015.00 AP 00392368 07/18/2018 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 4,843.20 4,460.78 9,303.98 *** AP 00392369 07/18/2018 MAGELLAN ADVISORS LLC 21,477.21 0.00 21,477.21 AP 00392370 07/18/2018 MAIN STREET SIGNS 495.65 0.00 495.65 AP 00392371 07/18/2018 MIDWEST TAPE 612.00 0.00 612.00 AP 00392372 07/18/2018 MIZE, MATTHEW 46.46 0.00 46.46 AP 00392373 07/18/2018 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 672.24 0.00 672.24 AP 00392374 07/18/2018 NATIONAL FIRE FIGHTER WILDLAND 0.00 32.45 32.45 AP 00392375 07/18/2018 NBS 12,740.00 0.00 12,740.00 AP 00392376 07/18/2018 OROZCO, JOE 200.00 0.00 200.00 AP 00392377 07/18/2018 PALACIOS, JENNIFER 67.25 0.00 67.25 AP 00392378 07/18/2018 POLLOCK, LARRY 249.00 0.00 249.00 AP 00392379 07/18/2018 PROMOTIONS TEES & MORE 2,599.80 0.00 2,599.80 AP 00392380 07/18/2018 PUBLIC GROUP OF CA LLC, THE 363.23 0.00 363.23 AP 00392381 07/18/2018 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 6,982.16 0.00 6,982.16 AP 00392382 07/18/2018 RANCHO MALL LLC 13,054.00 0.00 13,054.00 AP 00392383 07/18/2018 RANCHO MALL LLC 6,450.00 0.00 6,450.00 AP 00392384 07/18/2018 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 18.86 0.00 18.86 AP 00392385 07/18/2018 RCEP UNIT #417 3,000.00 0.00 3,000.00 AP 00392386 07/18/2018 REGENCY ENTERPRISES INC 1,839.29 0.00 1,839.29 AP 00392387 07/18/2018 RICHARD WIGHTMAN CONSTRUCTION INC 375.00 0.00 375.00 AP 00392388 07/18/2018 RICHARD WIGHTMAN CONSTRUCTION INC 1,225.00 0.00 1,225.00 AP 00392389 07/18/2018 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 40,435.43 4,344.96 44,780.39 *** AP 00392390 07/18/2018 RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY 1,450.00 0.00 1,450.00 AP 00392391 07/18/2018 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT 6,337.10 0.00 6,337.10 AP 00392392 07/18/2018 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT 2,732.24 0.00 2,732.24 AP 00392393 07/18/2018 SB COUNTY FIRE DEPT 130.00 0.00 130.00 AP 00392394 07/18/2018 SC FUELS 50,802.27 0.00 50,802.27 AP 00392395 07/18/2018 SC FUELS 0.00 3,573.39 3,573.39 AP 00392396 07/18/2018 SECC CORP 15,621.25 0.00 15,621.25 AP 00392397 07/18/2018 SHOETERIA 669.07 0.00 669.07 AP 00392398 07/18/2018 SHRED IT USA LLC 190.95 0.00 190.95 AP 00392399 07/18/2018 SOCAL OFFICE TECHNOLOGIES 854.25 0.00 854.25 AP 00392400 07/18/2018 SOCAL PPE 0.00 3,389.55 3,389.55 AP 00392401 07/18/2018 SOCIAL VOCATIONAL SERVICES 3,734.00 0.00 3,734.00 AP 00392405 07/18/2018 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18,996.01 0.00 18,996.01 AP 00392406 07/18/2018 SPRINT 0.00 121.95 121.95 AP 00392407 07/18/2018 STANDARD FUSEE CORPORATION 0.00 1,356.50 1,356.50 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 6 Current Date: 07/24/2018 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 08:36:50 Page 30 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 7/10/2018 through 7/23/2018 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00392408 07/18/2018 STERLING COFFEE SERVICE 0.00 270.13 270.13 AP 00392409 07/18/2018 STOTZ EQUIPMENT 35,908.95 0.00 35,908.95 AP 00392410 07/18/2018 THOMPSON PLUMBING SUPPLY INC 578.90 0.00 578.90 AP 00392411 07/18/2018 TOVEY/SHULTZ CONSTRUCTION INC 73,433.30 714,682.97 788,116.27 *** AP 00392412 07/18/2018 C V W D 1,509.26 465.71 1,974.97 *** AP 00392416 07/18/2018 C V W D 103,234.86 0.00 103,234.86 AP 00392417 07/18/2018 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 403.91 0.00 403.91 AP 00392418 07/18/2018 UPS 71.52 0.00 71.52 AP 00392419 07/18/2018 VANDERHAWK CONSULTING LLC 17,500.00 0.00 17,500.00 AP 00392420 07/18/2018 VARGAS AND RAMIREZ SPORTS 7,868.34 0.00 7,868.34 AP 00392421 07/18/2018 VERIZON BUSINESS SERVICES 17.56 0.00 17.56 AP 00392426 07/18/2018 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 5,769.83 0.00 5,769.83 AP 00392427 07/18/2018 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 366.06 0.00 366.06 AP 00392428 07/18/2018 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 5,058.25 0.00 5,058.25 AP 00392429 07/18/2018 VICTOR MEDICAL COMPANY 6,965.68 0.00 6,965.68 AP 00392430 07/18/2018 VOHNE LICHE KENNELS INC 125.00 0.00 125.00 AP 00392431 07/18/2018 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 308.02 128.32 436.34 *** AP 00392432 07/18/2018 WELLS, JUDITH 50.14 0.00 50.14 AP 00392433 07/18/2018 WHITE HOUSE PHOTO INC 682.50 0.00 682.50 AP 00392434 07/18/2018 WILLIAMS, DIANE 212.64 0.00 212.64 AP 00392435 07/18/2018 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 53.03 0.00 53.03 AP 00392436 07/18/2018 ACTORS' EQUITY ASSOCIATION 12,231.00 0.00 12,231.00 AP 00392437 07/18/2018 AFLAC GROUP INSURANCE 40.97 0.00 40.97 AP 00392438 07/18/2018 ALONZO, SARAH ELIZABETH 798.00 0.00 798.00 AP 00392439 07/18/2018 ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF FOOTHILL COMMUNITIES 2,328.84 0.00 2,328.84 AP 00392440 07/18/2018 BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS TRAINING INSTITUTE 481.00 0.00 481.00 AP 00392441 07/18/2018 BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS TRAINING INSTITUTE 481.00 0.00 481.00 AP 00392442 07/18/2018 BELTRAN, OSBALDO ALVARADO 648.00 0.00 648.00 AP 00392443 07/18/2018 BLACKBAUD 8,710.56 0.00 8,710.56 AP 00392444 07/18/2018 CACEO 86.00 0.00 86.00 AP 00392445 07/18/2018 CALIFORNIA POOLS 15.56 0.00 15.56 AP 00392446 07/18/2018 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 1,318.48 0.00 1,318.48 AP 00392447 07/18/2018 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 301.05 0.00 301.05 AP 00392448 07/18/2018 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 312.88 0.00 312.88 AP 00392449 07/18/2018 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 100.00 0.00 100.00 AP 00392450 07/18/2018 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 8.44 0.00 8.44 AP 00392451 07/18/2018 CAPIO 225.00 0.00 225.00 AP 00392452 07/18/2018 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 0.00 9.05 9.05 AP 00392453 07/18/2018 CHASING 7 DREAMS 1,092.00 0.00 1,092.00 AP 00392454 07/18/2018 COLD DUCK PRODUCTIONS INC. 1,500.00 0.00 1,500.00 AP 00392455 07/18/2018 CONFIRE JPA 0.00 173,538.50 173,538.50 AP 00392456 07/18/2018 COSTAR REALTY INFORMATION INC 696.00 0.00 696.00 AP 00392457 07/18/2018 CREATIVE BRAIN LEARNING 594.00 0.00 594.00 AP 00392458 07/18/2018 DELANO, LAURA 459.00 0.00 459.00 AP 00392459 07/18/2018 DIRECTV 75.79 0.00 75.79 AP 00392460 07/18/2018 DOMINGUEZ, DESTINIE 639.00 0.00 639.00 AP 00392461 07/18/2018 EASTERDAY, MARK 1,200.00 0.00 1,200.00 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 7 Current Date: 07/24/2018 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 08:36:50 Page 31 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 7/10/2018 through 7/23/2018 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00392462 07/18/2018 EDUCATIONAL CREDIT MANAGEMENT CORP. 10.91 0.00 10.91 AP 00392463 07/18/2018 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 60.00 0.00 60.00 AP 00392464 07/18/2018 FIRST CLASS HEATING & AIR 400.00 0.00 400.00 AP 00392465 07/18/2018 FLEET SERVICES INC. 0.00 801.72 801.72 AP 00392466 07/18/2018 GALE/CENGAGE LEARNING 5,000.00 0.00 5,000.00 AP 00392467 07/18/2018 GIORDANO, MARIANNA 189.00 0.00 189.00 AP 00392468 07/18/2018 GOGOV APPS INC 7,200.00 0.00 7,200.00 AP 00392469 07/18/2018 HILLS PET NUTRITION SALES INC 1,104.20 0.00 1,104.20 AP 00392470 07/18/2018 ICMA 1,400.00 0.00 1,400.00 AP 00392471 07/18/2018 INDERWIESCHE, MATT 1,500.00 0.00 1,500.00 AP 00392472 07/18/2018 INLAND EMPIRE STAGES LTD 951.25 0.00 951.25 AP 00392473 07/18/2018 JOHNNY ALLEN TENNIS ACADEMY 4,576.20 0.00 4,576.20 AP 00392474 07/18/2018 KEITH, JORRY 216.00 0.00 216.00 AP 00392475 07/18/2018 LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS LLC 5,291.57 0.00 5,291.57 AP 00392476 07/18/2018 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 4,500.00 0.00 4,500.00 AP 00392477 07/18/2018 LITTLE, MARC 937.50 0.00 937.50 AP 00392478 07/18/2018 MARQUEZ, EMMANUEL E 1,000.00 0.00 1,000.00 AP 00392479 07/18/2018 MATANGA, JULIE EDWARD 357.00 0.00 357.00 AP 00392480 07/18/2018 MILLER, ASYA 250.00 0.00 250.00 AP 00392481 07/18/2018 MURGUTA, MARISELA 600.00 0.00 600.00 AP 00392482 07/18/2018 NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES 10,610.00 0.00 10,610.00 AP 00392483 07/18/2018 NICHOLS, GARY 833.00 0.00 833.00 AP 00392484 07/18/2018 PARSAC 602,171.00 0.00 602,171.00 AP 00392485 07/18/2018 PRE -PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 78.38 0.00 78.38 AP 00392486 07/18/2018 PUMA, DEBORAH WICKS LA 245.00 0.00 245.00 AP 00392487 07/18/2018 RAGAN COMMUNICATIONS INC 26.95 0.00 26.95 AP 00392488 07/18/2018 RANCHO CUCAMONGA STONEGATE 100.00 0.00 100.00 AP 00392489 07/18/2018 RICHARD WIGHTMAN CONSTRUCTION INC 2,200.00 0.00 2,200.00 AP 00392490 07/18/2018 ROCKSTARS OF TOMORROW, THE 1,000.00 0.00 1,000.00 AP 00392491 07/18/2018 RODMAN, JERII E 180.00 0.00 180.00 AP 00392492 07/18/2018 SAFE -ENTRY TECHNICAL INC 0.00 728.06 728.06 AP 00392493 07/18/2018 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT 209,242.32 0.00 209,242.32 AP 00392494 07/18/2018 SBPEA 1,621.38 0.00 1,621.38 AP 00392495 07/18/2018 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOC OF GOVERNMENTS 17,066.00 0.00 17,066.00 AP 00392496 07/18/2018 TORRES, NICHOLAS REGGIE 180.00 0.00 180.00 AP 00392497 07/18/2018 UNITED WAY 118.00 0.00 118.00 AP 00392498 07/18/2018 VENTEK INTERNATIONAL 2,070.00 0.00 2,070.00 AP 00392499 07/18/2018 VIRTUAL PROJECT MANAGER INC 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00392500 07/18/2018 WALTERS MUSIC AGENCY 1,700.00 0.00 1,700.00 AP 00392501 07/18/2018 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 166.67 4,388.17 4,554.84 *** AP 00392502 07/18/2018 WE TIP INC 8,826.70 0.00 8,826.70 AP 00392503 07/19/2018 LN CURTIS AND SONS 0.00 3,169.03 3,169.03 AP 00392504 07/19/2018 OFFICE DEPOT 3,508.36 0.00 3,508.36 AP 00392505 07/19/2018 OVERDRIVE INC 12,000.00 0.00 12,000.00 AP 00392506 07/19/2018 SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC 2,750.00 0.00 2,750.00 AP 00392507 07/19/2018 VISTA PAINT 64.63 0.00 64.63 AP 00392510 07/19/2018 INLAND EMPIRE PROPERTY SERVICES INC 0.00 37,022.50 37,022.50 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 8 Current Date: 07/24/2018 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 08:36:50 Page 32 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 7/10/2018 through 7/23/2018 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00392511 07/23/2018 CALIFORNIA DIVISION OF THE STATE ARCHITECT 1,138.90 0.00 1,138.90 Total City: $5,634,169.92 Total Fire: $2,975,629.74 Grand Total: , NntP• *** Check Number includes both City and Fire District expenditures User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 9 Current Date: 07/24/2018 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 08:36:50 Page 33 DATE: August 1, 2018 TO: President and Members of the Board of Directors FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Ivan Rojer, Fire Chief Rob Ball, Fire Marshal SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF A FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT RESOLUTION WAIVING THE COLLECTION OF CERTAIN INSPECTION, PERMIT, AND SPECIAL SERVICES FEES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018-19. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board approve and adopt a resolution which waives the collection of certain Inspection, Permit, and Special Services Fees that were previously approved by the Board and which would otherwise be collected for Fiscal Year 2018-19. BACKGROUND: Resolution FD 13-032, approved in 2013 by the Board, requires the District to complete an annual analysis of the approved fees to determine if there is a current need to collect the fees, in whole or in part, to meet the fiscal needs of the District. Upon completion and presentation of this analysis, the Board is required to direct staff, by means of a resolution, regarding the collection of fees for the current fiscal year. This will mark the 6th consecutive fiscal year waiving the collection of certain inspection, permit and special services fees. ANALYSIS: Pursuant to Resolution FD 13-032, staff conducted a review of currently approved fees in conjunction with the preparation of the Fiscal Year 2018-19 budgets. Staff determined that the existing financial condition of the District is such that there does not exist a fiscal need to collect certain Inspection, Permit, and Special Services Fees. As such, the District's budgets for Fiscal Year 2018-19 were prepared without including the projected revenue for most Inspection, Permit, and Special Services Fees. Since the budgets do not include the collection of most of these fees, a Resolution has been prepared for the Board's consideration that will direct Staff to waive the collection of certain fees for Fiscal Year 2018- 19. Consistent with previous fiscal years, the Inspection and Permit Fees that will not be collected this fiscal year are: 1) Fees previously approved for recurring inspections of facilities such as apartment buildings, hospitals, and medical care businesses. These are buildings and businesses that are regularly inspected, either by State mandate or by way of being identified as high hazard facilities, which do not Page 34 require a Fire Code Operating Permit. 2) Fees previously approved for Fire Code Operating Permits for certain hazardous and high-risk business operations that the Fire Code requires to be permitted by the local fire department. The permitting process anticipates that the business and its associated operations will be inspected on a regular basis to ensure compliance with all of the safety requirements for the particular operation or occupancy as conditioned by the permit. These fees are detailed in Exhibit A of the Resolution. Also consistent with previous fiscal years, the collection of fees for certain Special Services are waived when the required inspections and safety oversight monitoring can be completed during normal work hours. These fees are detailed in Exhibit B of the Resolution. As in previous fiscal years, the fees that will continue to be collected include: 1) Special Services Fees such as those approved for special events, fireworks shows, carnivals, and particularly hazardous situations such as open burning that require oversight by Prevention staff. These fees are generally associated with the need to pay overtime to Prevention staff who inspect these one- time activities and events typically during non -business hours. 2) Special Services Fees such as fees for Community Facilities District (CFD) annexations which cover administrative processing costs. 3) Fees for certain false or unwanted alarms and fees imposed for excessive re -inspections. 4) Fees for District supplied signs and equipment such as the cost recovery fees for District supplied padlocks that secure and provide firefighter access to gates throughout the Fire District and the District created signs that let firefighters know where access is obstructed, where ladder points for roof access are located, and where photovoltaic systems have been installed. It is certainly worth noting that waiving the collection of these Inspection, Permit, and Special Services Fees will have a positive economic impact in the community. Business revenues that would otherwise have been set aside for fees can be invested in the business, its employees, and the community. FISCAL IMPACT: Based on previous revenue reports and projections, it is anticipated that waiving the collection of these fees for service could reduce Fire District -revenue by as much as $750,000 for the current fiscal year. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Ensure that fees are covering costs and where needed, make adjustments accordingly, including reductions or increases, as appropriate. ATTACHMENTS: Description Attachment 1 - Resolution Attachment 2 - Exhibit A Attachment 3 - Exhibit B Page 35 ATTACHMENT 1 RESOLUTION NO. FD 18-xxx A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, WAIVING THE COLLECTION OF CERTAIN INSPECTION, PERMIT, AND SPECIAL SERVICES FEES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018-19. WHEREAS, Resolution No. FD 13-032 requires the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (Fire District) to complete an annual analysis of the approved fees to determine if there is a current need to collect the fees, in whole or in part, to meet the fiscal needs of the Fire District; and WHEREAS, Fire District staff completed this analysis in conjunction with preparing the fiscal year 2018- 19 budgets; and WHEREAS, Fire District staff determined that there does not exist a fiscal need to collect certain fees previously approved by the Board; and WHEREAS, the Fire District budgets for fiscal year 2018-19 have been approved; and WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred; NOW, THEREFORE, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, HEREBY RESOLVES, 1) To waive the collection of the Inspection and Permit fees identified in Exhibit A and to waive the collection of the Special Services Fees identified in Exhibit B when those Special Services can be provided during normal work hours. 2) That all other approved fees will be assessed and collected. 3) That nothing in this Resolution shall be deemed to affect any other fees of the Fire District currently in effect. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 1St day of August 2018. Resolution No. 18-xxx Page 1 of 1 Page 36 Exhibit A ATTACHMENT 2 Inspection and Permit Fees Inspection Fees Apartment Building / Complex Annual Inspection Buildings with 3 or 4 units $ 165 Buildings with 5 to 7 units $ 220 Buildings with 8 units $ 330 Each additional dwelling unit (per unit) $ 11 Condominium Complex Annual Inspection $ 330 High Rise Building annual inspection (per hour) $ 110 Hotel / Motel Annual Inspection $ 550 First 10 rooms $ 330 Each additional dwelling unit (per unit) $ 11 Licensed Care Facility $ 110 Pre -inspection - 25 or fewer residents $ 50 Pre -inspection - more than 25 residents $ 100 Annual Inspection Home Car Facility (more than six) $ 220 Commercial facility - first 10 rooms $ 330 Commercial facility - each additional room $ 11 Large Family Day Care annual inspection $ 110 Adult / Child Care Facility (Group 1-4 occupancies) $ 330 Private School / Large Child Care Facility (Group E occupancy) Small School - Less than 50 children $ 220 Large School - 50 or more children $ 330 Medical Facility Hospital / Nursing Home (Group 1-2.1) $ 660 Clinic $ 220 Ambulatory Care Facility (group 1-2.1) $ 330 Alternate Method Annual Inspection (per hour) $ 110 Permit Fees Access Control Commercial $ 165 Residential (requires monthly testing) $ 550 Aerosol Products $ 550 Ambulatory Health Care Facility $ 220 Amusement Building $ 275 Aviation Facility Servicing or Repair $ 550 Fuel Servicing Vehicles $ 220 Battery Charging Operation $ 220 Carbon Dioxide Systems Used in Beverage Dispensing $ 110 Cellulose Nitrate Film $ 330 Exhibit A Page 1 of 5 Page 37 Permit Fees, continued Combustible Dust Producing Operations 5,000 square feet or less $ 275 5,001 to 15,000 square feet $ 550 More than 15,000 square feet $ 715 Combustible Fibers $ 275 Commercial Cooking Operation $ 220 Compressed Gases Corrosive greater than 200 cubic feet $ 330 Flammable greater than 200 cubic feet $ 330 Highly toxic - any amount $ 330 Inert / Simple Asphyxiant greater than 6,000 cu ft $ 330 Irritant greater than 200 cubic feet $ 330 Medical Use Gases - Less than Table 105.6.8 Portable cylinders $ 165 Piped system $ 220 Other Health Hazard greater than 650 cubic feet $ 330 Oxidizing / oxygen greater than 504 cubic feet $ 330 Pyrophoric - any amount $ 330 Radioactive - any amount $ 330 Sensitizer greater than 200 cubic feet $ 330 Toxic - any amount $ 330 Unstable reactive - any amount $ 330 Covered Mall Building $ 658 Cryogenic Fluids $ 330 Cutting and Welding $ 275 Delayed Egress $ 165 Dipping Operations $ 330 Dry Cleaning Plant Small - 1 or 2 machines $ 220 Medium - 3 or 4 machines $ 330 Large - 5 or more machines $ 715 Explosives Process, manufacture, store, or sell $ 345 Use $ 240 Fire Alarm Services $10/acct Fire Hydrants and Valves $ 165 Exhibit A Page 2 of 5 Page 38 Permit Fees, continued Flammable and Combustible Liquids Class I liquids in excess of 5 gal. in a building; 10 gal. outside of a building Class II or Class IIIA in excess of 25 gal. in a building; 60 gal. outside of a building 250 gallons or less over max allowable quantity 251-500 gallons over max allowable quantity 501-1,000 gallons over max allowable quantity 1,001-5,000 gallons over max allowable quantity 5,001-10,000 gallons over max allowable quantity More than 10,000 gallons over max allowable quantity Remove Class I or Class II from a UST Operate tank vehicles, etc Place a tank out of service Change contents Manufacture, Process, Blend, Refine Dispensing at Commercial, Industrial, Gov't site Dispense - Tank vehicle to fuel tank Use or Operate a pipeline within a facility Floor Finishing in excess of 350 sq ft with Class I or II liquids Commercial / Industrial Residential Fruit and Crop Ripening Hazardous Materials in excess of amounts listed in Table 105.6.2 Gallons - 250 or fewer Gallons - 251-500 Gallons - 501-1,000 Gallons - 1,001-5,000 Gallons - 5,001-10,000 Gallons - More than 10,000 Pounds - 1,000 or fewer Pounds - 1,001-5,000 Pounds - 5,001-10,000 Pounds - 10,001-25,000 Pounds - 25,001-50,000 Pounds - More than 50,000 Cubic feet - 500 or fewer Cubic feet - 501-2,000 Cubic feet - 2,001-5,000 Cubic feet - 5,001-10,000 Cubic feet - 10,001-25,000 Cubic feet - More than 25,000 HPM Facilities $ 165 $ 165 $ 550 $ 578 $ 605 $ 633 $ 660 $ 688 $ 936 $ 330 $ 936 $ 550 $ 1,128 $ 330 $ 330 $ 743 $ 240 $ 136 $ 550 $ 550 $ 578 $ 605 $ 633 $ 660 $ 688 $ 550 $ 578 $ 605 $ 633 $ 660 $ 688 $ 550 $ 578 $ 605 $ 633 $ 660 $ 688 $ 440 Exhibit A Page 3 of 5 Page 39 Permit Fees, continued High Piled Combustible Storage in excess of 500 square feet 500-75,000 square feet $ 550 75,001-500,000 square feet $ 605 More than 500,000 square feet $ 660 Hot Work $ 330 Hot Work Fixed Site $ 275 Hot Work Operations $ 220 Hot Work Program $ 165 Operational Permits Industrial Facility/ Shop Includes all required permits; if actual fees are lower, actual fees will apply 2,500 square feet or less $ 240 2,501-5,000 square feet $ 330 5,001-15,000 square feet $ 550 15,001-50,000 square feet $ 743 More than 50,000 square feet - Actual permit fees Industrial Ovens $ 330 Large Family Day Care $ 110 Liquid- or Gas -Fueled vehicles or equipment in Assembly area or occupancy $ 165 LP -gas Store, Use, Handle, Dispense, Sell $ 220 Industrial Trucks and Equipment Only (4 cylinder maximum) $ 165 Cylinder Exchange only $ 110 Live Audience $ 240 Lumber Yard and/or Wood Working Plant $ 440 Magnesium $ 330 Miscellaneous Combustible Storage $ 220 Mobile Motor Fuel Dispensing $ 165 Motor Fuel Dispensing Facility - Commercial $ 330 Motor Fuel Dispensing Facility - Residential $ 110 Open Flames Open Flames and torches for paint removal $ 110 Open Flames and torches in a hazardous fire area $ 110 Open Flames and candles in Assembly and Education occupancies $ 110 Organic Coatings $ 330 Pallet Storage $ 275 Place of Assembly A-1 Theaters, Concert Halls, Auditoriums $ 440 A-2 Banquet Halls, Night Clubs, Restaurants, Taverns, Bars $ 330 A-3 Places of Worship, Recreation, Amusement $ 330 A-4 Indoor sports arenas and similar - fixed seats $ 440 A-5 Outdoor assembly area and/or use $ 660 Powder Coating $ 330 Private Fire Hydrant $ 165 Exhibit A Page 4 of 5 Page 40 Permit Fees, continued Production Facility $ 385 Pyrotechnical Special Effects Material (see Fireworks) Pyroxylin Plastics $ 440 Recycling and Scrap Metal Facility $ 550 Refrigeration Equipment $ 275 Reinforced Plastics / Resin Application $ 330 Repair Garage Includes all required permits; if actual fees are lower, actual fees will apply 2,500 square feet or less $ 240 2,501-5,000 square feet $ 330 5,001-15,000 square feet $ 550 15,001-50,000 square feet $ 743 More than 50,000 square feet - Actual permit fees Rooftop Heliport $ 220 Spraying Operations $ 330 Stationary Storage Battery System $ 330 Storage of Scrap Tires and Byproducts $ 220 Tire Rebuilding Plant $ 1,128 Waste Handling Facility $ 550 Wood Products $ 440 Wrecking Yard / Junk Yard $ 550 Exhibit A Page 5 of 5 Page 41 Exhibit B ATTACHMENT 3 Special Services Fees Special Amusement Building (Haunted House) Inspection $ 275 Asphalt Kettle Hot Work Non -pumping and less than 150 gallons $ 110 Pumping or more than 150 gallons $ 220 Carnivals, Fairs, and Outdoor Public Assemblages $ 220 Commercial cooking operation at outdoor event $ 136 Exhibits and Tradeshows $ 220 Explosives / Blasting Agents - single day permit $ 220 Hazardous Materials Tank - Remove or Abandon $ 715 Liquid or gas fueled vehicles in Assembly area $ 165 Live Audience $ 220 Open Burning or Bonfire $ 110 Open Flames - torches for paint removal $ 110 Open Flames - welding, brazing, soldering, etc in wildland fire area $ 110 Open Flames and fires in Group A or E occupancies $ 110 Parade - inspection of floats $ 110 Recreational Fire $ 110 Seasonal Sales Lot $ 136 Tent or Temporary membrane Structure $ 220 Torch Applied Roof Hot Work Patch / Repair (500 sq ft or less) $ 110 Roof Replacement (more than 500 sq ft) $ 165 Exhibit B Page 1 of 1 Page 42 DATE: August 1, 2018 TO: President and Members of the Board of Directors FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director Noah Daniels, Finance Manager SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL TO SET THE ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX LEVY FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NOS. 85-1 AND 88-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018/19. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Fire Board adopt resolutions approving the levy of special taxes for Community Facility District Nos. 85-1 and 88-1 for Fiscal Year 2018/19. BACKGROUND: Pursuant to the Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (the "1982 Act"), the Fire Board approved the levy of a special tax for fire protection and suppression services and facilities within certain geographical boundaries which formed the aforementioned Community Facility Districts (each a "District" and collectively, the "Districts"). Annually, prior to the County's direct assessment enrollment deadline in August, the Fire Board is asked to adopt a resolution approving the levy of special tax as reflected in the respective Annual Status Report for each district. Accordingly, for the upcoming Fiscal Year 2018/19 levy, the Fire Board's approval is recommended prior to the August 10, 2018 submittal deadline to the County of San Bernardino for the special taxes to be included in the upcoming tax roll. Although the Fire Board has previously authorized the formation of the Districts and the maximum levy of a special tax within the boundaries of the Districts, the actual annual special tax to be levied must be authorized on an annual basis. ANALYSIS: The annual levy of special taxes for the Districts is sufficient to pay for the public facilities and services associated with the Districts. These costs are permitted to be financed pursuant to the 1982 Act. All the costs related to the Districts are costs of the Districts, not the Fire District nor its General Fund. Thus, all costs related to administering the Districts are the responsibility of the property owners within the Districts. The annual levy of special taxes will be applied to all parcels within the Districts and will be levied and collected in perpetuity, unless and until such time the District determines that revenues are no longer needed. While the maximum annual special tax for the Districts increases annually, the actual assessment rate has remained unchanged for several years after being reduced in Fiscal Year 2015/16. Page 43 The table below summaries the levy for each District for Fiscal Year 2018/19: Community Facility District ProposedeS pecial Tax Notes 85-1 $ 6,026,075 No change from prior year. 88-1 $ 1,243,572 No change from prior year. The special taxes noted in the Annual Status Report for each district are net of estimated delinquencies for budgetary purposes. I n cases of special tax delinquency and foreclosure, the parcels will be subject to penalties. If approved, City staff will file the certified list of all parcels subject to the special tax levy with the County of San Bernardino no later than the County's August 10, 2018 submittal deadline. Adoption of the resolutions will provide for the Fiscal Year 2018/19 levy upon the parcels within the District that are not otherwise exempt from taxation, at the rates set forth in the attached Annual Status Reports for Fiscal Year 2018/19. FISCAL IMPACT: The Districts are separate from the Fire District General Fund. The special tax revenues that are collected for each District are used for the related services and administration costs for only that District. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This item addresses the City Council's goal to continue supporting and enhancing the long term financial sustainability of the City's special districts. ATTACHMENTS: Description Attachment 1 - Resolution (CFD 85-1) Attachment 2 -Annual Status Report (CFD 85-1) Attachment 3 - Resolution (CFD 88-1) Attachment 4 -Annual Status Report (CFD 88-1) Page 44 RESOLUTION NO. FD 18-013 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING THE ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018/19 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, California, (formerly Foothill Fire Protection District, hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body"), (a) initiated proceedings in 1985 to (i) form the Foothill Fire Protection District Community Facilities District No. 85-1 ("CFD No. 85-11") and (ii) authorize the levy of special taxes within CFD No. 85-1; (b) held a public hearing regarding the foregoing and formed CFD No. 85-1; and (c) conducted an election on December 10, 1985 and more than two-thirds (2/3) of the qualified electors voted in favor of a proposition authorizing the levy of special taxes in CFD No. 85-1, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982," being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California (the "Act"); and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by ordinance, as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the annual levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said CFD No. 85-1 at the rate and apportion the special tax in the manner specified in the resolution adopted pursuant to Article 2 (commencing with Section 53318 of the Government Code), except that this Board of Directors may levy the special tax at a lower rate; and WHEREAS, this Board of Directors desires to levy a special tax in the CFD No. 85-1 for the Fiscal Year 2018/19. NOW, THEREFORE, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, HEREBY RESOLVES: SECTION 1: Levy of Special Tax. That the specific rate and amount of the special tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for the Fiscal Year 2018/19 for the CFD No. 85-1 is hereby determined and established as set forth in the attached, referenced and incorporated Exhibit "A". SECTION 2: Exempt Properties. That properties or entities of the State, Federal or other local governments shall be exempt from such special tax. SECTION 3: Use of Special Tax. That the proceeds of the special tax shall be used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: (a) The construction, acquisition, expansion and/or rehabilitation of public facilities, within or for the benefit of the CFD No. 85-1 generally described as follows: Fire protection and suppression facilities and appurtenances, including equipment, real property and other tangible property with an estimated useful life of five years or longer. (b) The services to be provided within the CFD No. 85-1 are generally described as follows: The performance by employees of functions, operations and maintenance and repair activities in order to provide fire protection within the CFD No. 85-1. (c) The repayment of advances and loans. The special tax shall be used solely for the purposes specified above and for no other purpose. Resolution No. FD 18-013- Page 1 of 4 ATTACH MEN_,Qe145 SECTION 4: Annual Adjustment in Maximum Special Tax. Pursuant to authorization of the qualified electorate, this Board of Directors hereby declares that it shall annually adjust the maximum special tax based upon the lesser of: (a) changes in cost of living; or (b) changes in cost of living and changes in population as defined in Section 7901 of the Government Code occurring within the CFD No. 85-1 in the immediately preceding fiscal year. (c) The maximum authorized special tax rates are set forth in the attached referenced and incorporated Exhibit "B" SECTION 5: Collection of Special Tax. The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 1St day of August 2018. Resolution No. FD 18-013- Page 2 of 4 ATTACH MEN-,Qe146 EXHIBIT "A" SPECIAL TAX FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018/19 IN MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX STRUCTURES FISCAL YEAR 2018/19 Residential Multi -Family Residential Commercial Industrial Reduction $144.12 per DU 2 DU: 1.75 ($144.12) 3 DU: 2.25 ($144.12) 4 DU: 2.65 ($144.12) 5 - 14 DU: 2.65 ($144.12) + {.35 (TU - 4) ($144.12)} 15 - 30 DU: 6.15 ($144.12) + {.30 (TU - 14) ($144.12)} 31 - 80 DU: 10.65 ($144.12) + {.25 (TU - 30) ($144.12)} 81 - up DU: 23.15 ($144.12) + {.20 (TU - 80) ($144.12)} $144.12 per acre + $0.078 per SF $144.12 per acre + $0.095 per SF NOTE: DU = Dwelling Unit TU = Total Units SF = Square Foot Commercial and industrial structures shall be granted a $0.01 reduction in the special tax for the installation of complete sprinkler systems. In addition, multi -floor commercial and industrial structures shall also be granted a $0.01 reduction (not cumulative) in special tax for each separate floor above or below the main ground floor of the structure. Resolution No. FD 18-013- Page 3 of 4 ATTACH MEN_,Qe147 EXHIBIT "B" MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX FOR MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 IN FISCAL YEAR 2018/19 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT PER CAPITA COST FISCAL YEAR MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX OF LIVING CHANGE 2017/18 BASE FISCAL YEAR 2018/19 1.0378% $163.87DU STRUCTURES Residential Multi -Family Residential Commercial Industrial Reduction $170.06 DU MAXIMUM ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FISCAL YEAR 2018/19 $170.06 per DU 2 DU: 1.75 ($170.06) 3 DU: 2.25 ($170.06) 4 DU: 2.65 ($170.06) 5 - 14 DU: 2.65 ($170.06) + {.35 (TU - 4) ($170.06)1 15 - 30 DU: 6.15 ($170.06) + {.30 (TU - 14) ($170.06)1 31 - 80 DU: 10.65 ($170.06) + {.25 (TU - 30) ($170.06)1 81 - up DU: 23.15 ($170.06) + {.20 (TU - 80) ($170.06)1 $170.06 per acre + $0.089 per SF $170.06 per acre + $0.109 per SF NOTE: DU = Dwelling Unit TU = Total Units SF = Square Foot Commercial and industrial structures shall be granted a $0.01 reduction in the special tax for the installation of complete sprinkler systems. In addition, multi -floor commercial and industrial structures shall also be granted a $0.01 reduction (not cumulative) in special tax for each separate floor above or below the main ground floor of the structure. Resolution No. FD 18-013- Page 4 of 4 ATTACH MEN_,Qe148 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 ANNUAL STATUS REPORT AUGUST 2018 Page 49 Resolution No. FD 18-013 BACKGROUND On December 10, 1985, the electors within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 85-1 (CFD No. 85-1) the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (formerly Foothill Fire Protection District, the "District") voted in favor of a proposition to authorize the levy of a special tax for fire suppression services and facilities, to establish an appropriations limit and to annually adjust the special tax and appropriations limit based upon changes in the cost of living and changes in population. CFD No. 85-1 is bounded generally on the north by the 210 Freeway, on the east by Etiwanda, on the south by 4t" and on the west by Archibald. The maximum special tax shall be annually adjusted for the lesser of (a) changes in cost of living; or (b) changes in the cost of living and changes in population as defined in Section 7901 of the Government Code, as amended. It has been determined that there are sufficient revenues available in the CFD No. 85-1 to meet all financial obligations without an increase to the CFD No. 85-1 for Fiscal Year 2018/19. The maximum tax rate which could be levied is adjusted per the March Los Angeles -Long Beach -Anaheim Consumer Price Index. The change in the Cost of Living is 1.0378% for Fiscal Year 2018/19. Community Facilities District No. 85-1 Fiscal Year 2018/19 1 ATTACHMENT #02 Page 50 Resolution No. FD 18-013 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FISCAL YEAR 2018/19 STRUCTURES ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX Residential $144.12 per DU Multi -Family 2 DU 1.75 ($144.12) Residential 3 DU 2.25 ($144.12) 4 DU 2.65 ($144.12) 5 -14 DU 2.65 ($144.12) + {.35 (TU - 4) ($144.12)} 15 - 30 DU 6.15 ($144.12) + {.30 (TU - 14) ($144.12)1 31 - 80 DU 10.65 ($144.12) + {.25 (TU - 30) ($144.12)} 81 - up DU 23.15 ($144.12) + {.20 (TU - 80) ($144.12)} Commercial $144.12 per acre + $.078 per SF Industrial $144.12 per acre + $.095 per SF NOTE: DU = Dwelling Unit TU = Total Units SF = Square Foot Rnrh 1r+inn Commercial and industrial structures shall be granted a $0.01 reduction in the special tax for the installation of complete sprinkler systems. In addition, multi -floor commercial and industrial structures shall also be granted a $0.01 reduction (not cumulative) in special tax for each separate floor above or below the main ground floor of the structure. Community Facilities District No. 85-1 Fiscal Year 2018/19 2 ATTACHMENT #02 Page 51 Resolution No. FD 18-013 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 PROPOSED SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS Fiscal Year 2018/19 Budget Sources Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies $ 6,006,190 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 49,910 Subtotal - Taxes 6,056,100 Interest Revenue 39,820 Total Proposed Sources $ 6,095,920 Uses Communications 337,050 Fire Suppression 5,339,370 Fire Station Operations and Maintenance 124,070 Adm in./General Overhead 265,380 Total Proposed Uses $ 6,065,870 Community Facilities District No. 85-1 3 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT #02 Page 52 Resolution No. FD 18-013 v- C 0 00 rte" a, • < E J GAG i.r ❑ AV 4JJ3q3 � pp LL. 1 AV XSt� V) . h ' IAyepuumllE a AypuEn49 I � � � � AVJelseyo0a � ',d AiiUft[[!w AIV U3)AHII;'J AyuaAeH � AyuanelJ I y esaLUJa H - AV RSOLLJ.I@H Ab RI q!4OJb ! Ay PiEq! 4ClJ'd AV UIRIWI aH I � ny ueLuIIIH L AV PJEAQUIA IS upgauJe i - �. S Ay�AOJ� �g � 0 CO LL ll _ i 41fl. id Community Facilities District No. 85-1 4 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT #02 Page 53 RESOLUTION NO. FD 18-014 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING THE ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018/19 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, California, (formerly Foothill Fire Protection District, hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a community facilities district, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982," being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California. This community facilities district shall hereinafter be referred to as Community Facilities District No. 88-1 (hereinafter referred to as the "CFD No. 88-1 "); and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by ordinance, as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said CFD No. 88-1, and this legislative body is desirous to establish the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the next fiscal year and to adjust the maximum special tax authorization to be levied. NOW, THEREFORE, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, HEREBY RESOLVES: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the special tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for Fiscal Year 2018/19 for the referenced CFD No. 88-1 is hereby determined and established as set forth in the attached, referenced, and incorporated Exhibit "A". SECTION 3: That the rate as set forth above does not exceed the amount as previously authorized by ordinance of this legislative body, and is not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the CFD No. 88-1. SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the special tax shall be used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: A. Payment of principal and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness, if any; B. Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds, including sinking funds; C. Payment of costs and expenses of authorized public facilities and public services, including the administration of the special tax levy; and D. Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate. The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. SECTION 5: That the maximum authorized special tax rates for all developed properties are hereby adjusted pursuant to Ordinance No. 17. The maximum authorized special tax rates are set forth in the attached, referenced, and incorporated Exhibit "B". SECTION 6: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax. Resolution No. FD 18-014- Page 1 of 4 ATTACHMEN_,Q54 SECTION 7: All monies above collected shall be paid into the CFD No. 88-1 funds, including any bond fund and reserve fund. SECTION 8: The County Auditor is hereby directed to enter in the next County assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land affected in a space marked "public improvements," "special tax" or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special tax, and for the exact rate and amount of said tax reference is made to the attached Exhibit "A". SECTION 9: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to the Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties, and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 1 sc day of August 2018. Resolution No. FD 18-014- Page 2 of 4 ATTACH MEN-Q�55 SF = Square Feet Resolution No. FD 18-014- Page 3 of 4 ATTACH MEN - Q& EXHIBIT "A" RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 SPECIAL TAX LEVY FISCAL YEAR 2018/19 SPECIAL TAX LEVY SPECIAL TAX LEVY TAXING CLASSIFICATION FISCAL YEAR 2017/18 FISCAL YEAR 2018/19 1. DEVELOPED PROPERTY A. Residential Class 1 $440.08 $440.08 (more than 3,590 SF) B. Residential Class 11 $339.09 $339.09 (3,077 to 3,589 SF) C. Residential Class 111 $269.89 $269.89 (2,564 to 3,076 SF) D. Residential Class IV $235.85 $235.85 (2,308 to 2,563 SF) E. Residential Class V $204.22 $204.22 (2,051 to 2,307 SF) F. Residential Class VI $186.00 $186.00 (1,795 to 2,050 SF) G. Residential Class VII $167.75 $167.75 (less than 1,795 SF) Commercial/Industrial Property $677.13 per acre or $0.061 $677.13 per acre or $0.061 per sq. ft. of building area, per sq. ft. of building area, whichever is greater. whichever is greater. 2. APPROVED PROPERTY $200 per lot or parcel $200.00 per lot or parcel 3. VACANT PROPERTY $10.00 per acre $10.00 per acre SF = Square Feet Resolution No. FD 18-014- Page 3 of 4 ATTACH MEN - Q& EXHIBIT "B" RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX RATES FISCAL YEAR 2018/19 DEVELOPED PROPERTY MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX RATE TAXING CLASSIFICATION FISCAL YEAR 2017/18 1. DEVELOPED PROPERTY FISCAL YEAR 2018/19 A. Residential Class 1 $1,307.56 $1,366.26 (more than 3,590 SF) B. Residential Class II $1,002.64 $1,047.65 (3,077 to 3,589 SF) C. Residential Class III $800.13 $836.05 (2,564 to 3,076 SF) D. Residential Class IV $701.31 $732.79 (2,308 to 2,563 SF) E. Residential Class V $600.15 $627.09 (2,051 to 2,307 SF) F. Residential Class VI $554.32 $579.20 (1,795 to 2,050 SF) G. Residential Class VII $500.57 $523.04 (less than 1,795 SF) H. Commercial/Industrial Property $2,012.48 per acre or $2,102.84 per acre or $0.16268 per sq. ft. of bldg $0.16998 per sq. ft. of bldg area, whichever is greater. area, whichever is greater. 2. APPROVED PROPERTY $200.00 per lot or parcel $200.00 per lot or parcel 3. VACANT PROPERTY $10.00 per acre $10.00 per acre SF = Square Feet NOTE: Escalation of maximum special rate. Calculation formula Fiscal Year 2018/19 Population CPI* Change Change Factor 1.0079 X 1.0367 = 1.0449 *CPI - California Per Capita Personal Income Resolution No. FD 18-000- Page 4 of 4 ATTACHMENT #03 Page 57 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 ANNUAL STATUS REPORT AUGUST 2018 Page 58 Resolution No. FD 18-014 BACKGROUND On April 4, 1989, the qualified voters approved the formation of Mello -Roos Community Facilities District No. 88-1 ("CFD No. 88-11") and authorized CFD No. 88-1 to annually levy a special tax to provide for fire protection services within northeast Etiwanda. On May 19, 1989, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (formerly Foothill Fire Protection District) adopted an Ordinance authorizing the CFD No. 88-1, by Resolution, to annually levy a special tax in CFD No. 88-1 for purposes of land acquisition, fire station construction, purchase of equipment and operations and maintenance costs for fire protection services. CFD No. 88-1 is located within the boundaries of Highland, Cherry, Day Creek Channel and the San Bernardino National Forest. For Fiscal Year 2018/19, staff has determined that there are sufficient revenues available to meet all financial obligations; hence, there will be no increase in the actual assessment rate for CFD No. 88-1 for Fiscal Year 2018/19. The maximum special tax shall be annually adjusted for changes in cost of living; or changes in the cost of living and changes in population as defined in Section 7901 of the Government Code, as amended, whichever is lesser. The change in the cost of living and changes in population is 1.04490% for Fiscal Year 2018/19. Community Facilities District No. 88-1 1 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT #04 Page 59 Resolution No. FD 18-014 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FISCAL YEAR 2018/19 DEVELOPED A. Residential Class 1 $440.08/sfd B. Residential Class 2 $339.09/sfd C. Residential Class 3 $269.89/sfd D. Residential Class 4 $235.85/sfd E. Residential Class 5 $204.22/sfd F. Residential Class 6 $186.00/sfd G. Residential Class 7 $167.75/sfd H. Commercial/Industrial $677.13/acre or $0.061/ sq. ft. or whichever is greater APPROVED $200.00/lot or parcel UNDEVELOPED $10.00/acre Community Facilities District No. 88-1 2 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT #04 Page 60 Resolution No. FD 18-014 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 PROPOSED SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS Fiscal Year 2018/19 Budget Sources Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies $ 1,230,760 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 9,990 Subtotal - Taxes 1,240,750 Transfers In Total Proposed Sources Uses Communications Fire Suppression Fire Station Operations and Maintenance Admin./General Overhead Total Proposed Uses Community Facilities District No. 88-1 Fiscal Year 2018/19 1,205,190 $ 2,445,940 84,270 2,217,280 35,850 108,540 $ 2,445,940 3 ATTACHMENT #04 Page 61 AVUaAEH ^soLuJa H I-1 i 1ecl14nJv AV UGLUJI43H I[ ue11BUJED AV Ja}sg4M l no Resolution No. FD 18-014 Ir � J � — AV kAeq j a) C� C3 C7 J o Ji�nn CO � S@ iE L G�} i i I IAV 12PLI'e.00.11-1 AV Ja;RULPO�j Ay Ua�!II!V4 Community Facilities District No. 88-1 4 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT #04 Page 62 iAV uaAeH AV E!SCrwJaH Ay PIvgl4ojV AV uPwIIH co —i i r § aa� V •J � _ gg it pxil� Community Facilities District No. 88-1 4 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT #04 Page 62 DATE: August 1, 2018 TO: President and Members of the Board of Directors FROM: John Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Ruth Cain, CPPB, Procurement Manager Cheryl Combs, Procurement Technician SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE USE OF THE NATIONAL IPA COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH OFFICE DEPOT FOR THE PROCUREMENT OF OFFICE SUPPLIES FROM OFFICE DEPOT AND AUTHORIZE THE USE OF FUTURE RENEWALS AS AWARDED BY NATIONAL IPA, TO BE FUNDED BY VARIOUS CITYWIDE ACCOUNT NUMBERS, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ADOPTED BUDGET. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Fire Board approve the use of the National I PA Cooperative Agreement with Office Depot, Contract 13-23R, awarded by the City of Tamarac, Florida, for the procurement of citywide office supplies and authorize the use of future renewals as awarded by National IPA, to be funded by various citywide account numbers, in accordance with the adopted budget. BACKGROUND: The Procurement Division has identified a viable cooperative procurement option with National IPA for office supplies from Office Depot. The City has previously utilized a cooperative agreement for office supplies through a TCPN Cooperative Agreement with Office Depot. TCPN has merged with National IPA, and a new agreement has been awarded to Office Depot by the City of Tamarac, Florida, through National I PA. The solicitation was competitively bid and awarded. The City currently has an electronic system in place that allows users to order a variety of office supplies including paper and printer toner cartridges through Office Depot. ANALYSIS: Staff recommends the Fire Board authorize the purchase of office supplies from Office Depot utilizing the National I PA Contract Number 13-23R awarded by Tamarac, Florida, for the respective supplies available on the contract. The contract term has an expiration date of October 17, 2019, with options to renew as awarded by National I PA. Staff also recommends authorizing expenditures in accordance with the adopted fiscal year budgets from various citywide accounts. Procurement will continue to review the contracts annually. FISCAL IMPACT: As of 5/31/18, the FY 17/18 the total purchases through Office Depot were $193,337, with $74,716 in the Page 63 green spend category. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Continuing to utilize the NI PA Cooperative Agreement to procure items such as Office Supplies is tied to the Mid and Long Range Planning Council goal. Use of the Agreement effectively manages cost by providing steeper discounts to the City due to the high product volume procured by Citywide Departments as well as other entities that also utilize the Agreement. This allows for more accurate budget planning for departments for the term of the Agreement. Page 64 DATE: August 1, 2018 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Tamara Layne, Finance Director SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE BI -WEEKLY PAYROLL IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,210,557.35 AND WEEKLY CHECK REGISTERS IN THE AMOUNT OF $5,634,169.92 DATED JULY 10, 2018 THROUGH JULY 23, 2018. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends City Council approve payment of demands as presented. BACKGROUND: N/A ANALYSIS: N/A FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate budgeted funds are available for the payment of demands per the attached listing. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: N/A ATTACHMENTS: Description Attachment 1 Check Register Page 65 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 7/10/2018 through 7/23/2018 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00008130 07/11/2018 KME FIRE APPARATUS 0.00 672,267.00 672,267.00 AP 00008131 07/11/2018 SAN BERNARDINO CTY SHERIFFS DEPT 3,135,756.00 0.00 3,135,756.00 AP 00008132 07/11/2018 WESTERN RENEWABLE ENERGY GENERATION INFO 143.32 0.00 143.32 AP 00008133 07/11/2018 HD PRODUCTIONS INC 3,450.00 0.00 3,450.00 AP 00008134 07/11/2018 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 336.00 0.00 336.00 AP 00008135 07/11/2018 US DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 10,793.23 0.00 10,793.23 AP 00008136 07/18/2018 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 1,100.00 0.00 1,100.00 AP 00008137 07/18/2018 SARGENT TOWN PLANNING INC 67,875.83 0.00 67,875.83 AP 00008138 07/18/2018 SHELL ENERGY NORTH AMERICA 22,500.00 0.00 22,500.00 AP 00008139 07/18/2018 TANKO LIGHTING 2,453.25 0.00 2,453.25 AP 00008140 07/18/2018 CALIF GOVERNMENT VEBA/RANCHO CUCAMONGA 15,595.79 0.00 15,595.79 AP 00008141 07/18/2018 RCCEA 1,899.50 0.00 1,899.50 AP 00008142 07/18/2018 RCPFA 11,509.11 0.00 11,509.11 AP 00392124 07/11/2018 CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL UTILITIES ASSOC 9,359.00 0.00 9,359.00 AP 00392125 07/11/2018 CANO, ZAYLIN ELLENI 1,000.00 0.00 1,000.00 AP 00392126 07/11/2018 CARTY, DIANE 108.00 0.00 108.00 AP 00392127 07/11/2018 DAISY 133.57 0.00 133.57 AP 00392128 07/11/2018 DELIRA, MARK 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00392129 07/11/2018 ENVISIONWARE INC. 1,861.04 0.00 1,861.04 AP 00392130 07/11/2018 EREDIA, PATRICIA MORGAN 300.00 0.00 300.00 AP 00392131 07/11/2018 ERICKSON, CATHERINE 1,500.00 0.00 1,500.00 AP 00392132 07/11/2018 GASIO, KEVIN 1,500.00 0.00 1,500.00 AP 00392133 07/11/2018 GRIFFITHS, VICTORIA MICHELLE 800.00 0.00 800.00 AP 00392134 07/11/2018 HAVEN CAR WASH 5,000.00 0.00 5,000.00 AP 00392135 07/11/2018 HUDSON AUDIO WORKS 3,000.00 0.00 3,000.00 AP 00392136 07/11/2018 1CMA 0.00 200.00 200.00 AP 00392137 07/11/2018 JACQUEZ, LAIHLA 250.00 0.00 250.00 AP 00392138 07/11/2018 LEMUS, TIMOTHY A 400.00 0.00 400.00 AP 00392139 07/11/2018 NEOPOST USA INC 452.69 0.00 452.69 AP 00392140 07/11/2018 ROBINSON, NICK 2,000.00 0.00 2,000.00 AP 00392141 07/11/2018 SAN BERNARDINO CTY FPO ASSOCIATION 0.00 100.00 100.00 AP 00392142 07/11/2018 SHARP, JOHN M 2,000.00 0.00 2,000.00 AP 00392143 07/11/2018 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 528.46 138.64 667.10 *** AP 00392144 07/11/2018 STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY 13,374.43 0.00 13,374.43 AP 00392145 07/11/2018 STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY 6,791.36 0.00 6,791.36 AP 00392146 07/11/2018 TRIMMER, PATRICIA A 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00392147 07/11/2018 TUMBLEWEED PRESS INC 838.60 0.00 838.60 AP 00392148 07/11/2018 VANCE, CURTIS 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00392149 07/11/2018 VIVERAE INC 1,150.00 0.00 1,150.00 AP 00392150 07/11/2018 WILKS, REBECCA 600.00 0.00 600.00 AP 00392151 07/11/2018 A & M FIRST AID INC 604.48 0.00 604.48 AP 00392152 07/11/2018 ACCELA INC 140,524.00 46,841.00 187,365.00 *** AP 00392153 07/11/2018 ALFORD, TIM 0.00 270.00 270.00 AP 00392154 07/11/2018 ALL CITIES TOOLS 0.00 40.00 40.00 AP 00392155 07/11/2018 ALL SOURCE EQUIPMENT 9,201.00 0.00 9,201.00 AP 00392156 07/11/2018 ALLIANCE BUS LINES INC 3,779.68 0.00 3,779.68 AP 00392157 07/11/2018 ALLIANT INSURANCE SERVICES INC. 12,477.00 0.00 12,477.00 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 1 Current Date: 07/24/2018 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 08:36:50 Page 66 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 7/10/2018 through 7/23/2018 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00392158 07/11/2018 ALLSTAR FIRE EQUIPMENT INC 0.00 684.00 684.00 AP 00392159 07/11/2018 ALPHAGRAPHICS 0.00 1,820.63 1,820.63 AP 00392160 07/11/2018 APPLIED CONCEPTS 536.60 0.00 536.60 AP 00392161 07/11/2018 ARROW INTERNATIONAL 0.00 1,196.52 1,196.52 AP 00392162 07/11/2018 ASSI SECURITY 0.00 9,645.00 9,645.00 AP 00392163 07/11/2018 AT&T MOBILITY 0.00 86.46 86.46 AP 00392166 07/11/2018 C V W D 89,772.45 1,477.93 91,250.38 *** AP 00392167 07/11/2018 CALIFORNIA BANK & TRUST 2,073.99 39,405.81 41,479.80 *** AP 00392168 07/11/2018 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 0.00 81.84 81.84 AP 00392169 07/11/2018 CHAMPION AWARDS AND SPECIALTIES 32.33 0.00 32.33 AP 00392170 07/11/2018 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES INC. 440.00 0.00 440.00 AP 00392171 07/11/2018 CINTAS CORPORATION #150 0.00 288.09 288.09 AP 00392172 07/11/2018 CLARKE PLUMBING SPECIALTIES INC. 0.00 60.92 60.92 AP 00392173 07/11/2018 CONCEPT POWDER COATING 245.00 0.00 245.00 AP 00392174 07/11/2018 CONVERGEONE INC. 7,520.00 0.00 7,520.00 AP 00392175 07/11/2018 CRAWFORD & COMPANY 580.23 0.00 580.23 AP 00392176 07/11/2018 CREATIVE BRAIN LEARNING 1,188.00 0.00 1,188.00 AP 00392177 07/11/2018 DAISY 2,839.17 0.00 2,839.17 AP 00392178 07/11/2018 DATA ARC LLC 4,999.92 4,034.81 9,034.73 *** AP 00392179 07/11/2018 DATA TICKET INC 6,734.25 0.00 6,734.25 AP 00392180 07/11/2018 DUMBELL MAN FITNESS EQUIPMENT, THE 1,996.88 847.34 2,844.22 *** AP 00392181 07/11/2018 EIGHTH AVENUE ENTERPRISE LLC 255.37 0.00 255.37 AP 00392182 07/11/2018 ERICKSON HALL CONSTRUCTION 0.00 20,410.00 20,410.00 AP 00392183 07/11/2018 EXECUTIVE AUTO DETAIL 1,415.00 0.00 1,415.00 AP 00392184 07/11/2018 FARMERS INSURANCE EXCHANGE 647.74 0.00 647.74 AP 00392185 07/11/2018 FEDERATED MUTUAL INSURANCE 5,706.65 0.00 5,706.65 AP 00392186 07/11/2018 FLEET SERVICES INC. 0.00 157.27 157.27 AP 00392187 07/11/2018 FORCIBLE ENTRY EQUIPMENT 0.00 1,531.70 1,531.70 AP 00392188 07/11/2018 FRANKLIN TRUCK PARTS 0.00 792.37 792.37 AP 00392189 07/11/2018 FRONTIER COMM 667.81 308.22 976.03 *** AP 00392190 07/11/2018 GOMEZ, LUIS 50.84 0.00 50.84 AP 00392191 07/11/2018 GRABHER, CHRIS 1,200.00 0.00 1,200.00 AP 00392192 07/11/2018 GRAINGER 3,220.60 1,029.97 4,250.57 *** AP 00392193 07/11/2018 HEARTSAFE AMERICA INC 0.00 4,540.40 4,540.40 AP 00392194 07/11/2018 HEARTSAVERS LLC 330.00 0.00 330.00 AP 00392195 07/11/2018 HILLS PET NUTRITION SALES INC 4,008.42 0.00 4,008.42 AP 00392196 07/11/2018 HMC ARCHITECTS 0.00 54,396.72 54,396.72 AP 00392197 07/11/2018 HORIZONS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY INTERNATIONAL 0.00 255,830.64 255,830.64 AP 00392198 07/11/2018 HOYT LUMBER CO., SM 0.00 205.60 205.60 AP 00392199 07/11/2018 HUANG, SIERRA 48.04 0.00 48.04 AP 00392200 07/11/2018 HUDSON AUDIO WORKS 1,400.00 0.00 1,400.00 AP 00392201 07/11/2018 INFORCER, THE 0.00 160.00 160.00 AP 00392202 07/11/2018 IRON MOUNTAIN OSDP 6,786.35 0.00 6,786.35 AP 00392203 07/11/2018 JONES, KEIMAUR 25.15 0.00 25.15 AP 00392204 07/11/2018 KNOX COMPANY 0.00 11,382.71 11,382.71 AP 00392205 07/11/2018 L E H AND ASSOCIATES 5,830.00 0.00 5,830.00 AP 00392206 07/11/2018 LANDCARE USA LLC 4,317.32 0.00 4,317.32 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 2 Current Date: 07/24/2018 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 08:36:50 Page 67 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 7/10/2018 through 7/23/2018 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00392207 07/11/2018 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 14,618.15 405.50 15,023.65 *** AP 00392208 07/11/2018 LIFE ASSIST INC 0.00 5,064.25 5,064.25 AP 00392209 07/11/2018 LOPEZ, JOSE 600.00 0.00 600.00 AP 00392210 07/11/2018 LUBRICATION ENGINEERS INC 289.10 0.00 289.10 AP 00392211 07/11/2018 MAIN STREET SIGNS 80.81 0.00 80.81 AP 00392212 07/11/2018 MARIPOSA LANDSCAPES INC 123,067.15 1,208.16 124,275.31 *** AP 00392213 07/11/2018 MARK CHRISTOPHER INC 339.59 0.00 339.59 AP 00392214 07/11/2018 MARLINK SA INC 0.00 162.00 162.00 AP 00392215 07/11/2018 MATLOCK DESIGN BUILD INC 320.00 0.00 320.00 AP 00392216 07/11/2018 MIDWEST TAPE 5,450.55 0.00 5,450.55 AP 00392217 07/11/2018 MINUTEMAN PRESS 1,660.42 764.53 2,424.95 *** AP 00392218 07/11/2018 MORRO, NICHOLE R 39.00 0.00 39.00 AP 00392219 07/11/2018 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 1,739.85 0.00 1,739.85 AP 00392220 07/11/2018 MUSICLAND 924.00 0.00 924.00 AP 00392221 07/11/2018 NAPA AUTO PARTS 9.40 18.94 28.34 *** AP 00392222 07/11/2018 NBS 3,771.85 0.00 3,771.85 AP 00392223 07/11/2018 O S T S INC 4,006.09 0.00 4,006.09 AP 00392224 07/11/2018 ONWARD ENGINEERING 14,928.00 0.00 14,928.00 AP 00392225 07/11/2018 PACIFIC PREMIER BANK 0.00 7,274.85 7,274.85 AP 00392226 07/11/2018 PATTON SALES CORP 0.00 174.95 174.95 AP 00392227 07/11/2018 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 454.79 0.00 454.79 AP 00392228 07/11/2018 PETRIVELLI, GINO 0.00 8.99 8.99 AP 00392229 07/11/2018 PRISTINE UNIFORMS LLC 0.00 415.80 415.80 AP 00392230 07/11/2018 PSA PRINT GROUP 77.58 0.00 77.58 AP 00392231 07/11/2018 PW GILLIBRAND INC 3,411.87 0.00 3,411.87 AP 00392232 07/11/2018 QUALITY CODE PUBLISHING 736.15 0.00 736.15 AP 00392233 07/11/2018 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 8.00 0.00 8.00 AP 00392234 07/11/2018 RC CONSTRUCTION SERVICES INC 0.00 138,222.07 138,222.07 AP 00392235 07/11/2018 REYNOLDS BUICK 905.52 0.00 905.52 AP 00392236 07/11/2018 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 46,267.18 12,226.80 58,493.98 *** AP 00392237 07/11/2018 SALAZAR, NATALIE 48.96 0.00 48.96 AP 00392238 07/11/2018 SAN ANTONIO REGIONAL HOSPITAL 0.00 2,321.00 2,321.00 AP 00392239 07/11/2018 SAUSEDA, ANA 2,300.00 0.00 2,300.00 AP 00392240 07/11/2018 SC FUELS 24,120.61 0.00 24,120.61 AP 00392241 07/11/2018 SHEAKLEY PENSION ADMINISTRATION 383.15 0.00 383.15 AP 00392242 07/11/2018 SHEAKLEY PENSION ADMINISTRATION 0.00 175.65 175.65 AP 00392243 07/11/2018 SHRED PROS 623.00 0.00 623.00 AP 00392244 07/11/2018 SIGN SHOP, THE 0.00 78.40 78.40 AP 00392245 07/11/2018 SMITH, MICHAEL 62.18 0.00 62.18 AP 00392246 07/11/2018 SMITH, VALERIE 150.00 0.00 150.00 AP 00392247 07/11/2018 SOUTH COAST AQMD 0.00 131.79 131.79 AP 00392248 07/11/2018 SOUTH COAST AQMD 0.00 135.04 135.04 AP 00392253 07/11/2018 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 26,875.50 2,266.56 29,142.06 *** AP 00392254 07/11/2018 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 42.89 0.00 42.89 AP 00392255 07/11/2018 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 740.99 0.00 740.99 AP 00392256 07/11/2018 STATE CONTROLLER'S OFFICE 2,467.34 0.00 2,467.34 AP 00392257 07/11/2018 STERLING COFFEE SERVICE 1,294.17 0.00 1,294.17 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 3 Current Date: 07/24/2018 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 08:36:50 Page 68 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 7/10/2018 through 7/23/2018 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00392258 07/11/2018 STORAGE CONTAINER.COM 198.00 0.00 198.00 AP 00392259 07/11/2018 STROHMAN, WILLIAM F 2,200.00 0.00 2,200.00 AP 00392260 07/11/2018 SWIFTY SIGN 0.00 129.30 129.30 AP 00392261 07/11/2018 TICKET ENVELOPE COMPANY 720.00 0.00 720.00 AP 00392262 07/11/2018 TORGA ELECTRIC 61,104.00 0.00 61,104.00 AP 00392263 07/11/2018 TOVEY/SHULTZ CONSTRUCTION INC 33,744.42 712,892.05 746,636.47 *** AP 00392264 07/11/2018 TRIMARK ASSOCIATES INC 2,136.00 0.00 2,136.00 AP 00392265 07/11/2018 TRINITY EQUIPMENT RENTALS 1,761.99 0.00 1,761.99 AP 00392266 07/11/2018 UNITED SITE SERVICES OF CA INC 281.34 0.00 281.34 AP 00392267 07/11/2018 UPS 136.52 0.00 136.52 AP 00392268 07/11/2018 UTILIQUEST 1,089.08 0.00 1,089.08 AP 00392269 07/11/2018 VERIZON 23.80 0.00 23.80 AP 00392270 07/11/2018 VICTOR MEDICAL COMPANY 7,969.68 0.00 7,969.68 AP 00392271 07/11/2018 VILLALOBOS, KHRYSTYNE 15.00 0.00 15.00 AP 00392272 07/11/2018 VORTEX INDUSTRIES INC 538.77 0.00 538.77 AP 00392273 07/11/2018 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 211.97 0.00 211.97 AP 00392274 07/11/2018 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 1,122.79 0.00 1,122.79 AP 00392275 07/11/2018 WESTERN UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCE 925.00 0.00 925.00 AP 00392276 07/11/2018 WILBUR-ELLIS COMPANY 2,679.63 0.00 2,679.63 AP 00392277 07/11/2018 WOMEN LEADING GOVERNMENT 195.00 0.00 195.00 AP 00392278 07/11/2018 XEROX CORPORATION 1,260.24 0.00 1,260.24 AP 00392279 07/11/2018 YERO, ART 2,300.00 0.00 2,300.00 AP 00392280 07/11/2018 ZOETIS US LLC 2,088.45 0.00 2,088.45 AP 00392281 07/12/2018 ABC LOCKSMITHS 2,633.54 0.00 2,633.54 AP 00392286 07/12/2018 BRODART BOOKS 11,937.99 0.00 11,937.99 AP 00392287 07/12/2018 CALSENSE 847.09 0.00 847.09 AP 00392288 07/12/2018 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 397.64 0.00 397.64 AP 00392289 07/12/2018 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 201.87 0.00 201.87 AP 00392290 07/12/2018 FORD OF UPLAND INC 1,939.10 0.00 1,939.10 AP 00392291 07/12/2018 GENERATOR SERVICES CO 3,961.88 0.00 3,961.88 AP 00392292 07/12/2018 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 1,548.87 0.00 1,548.87 AP 00392293 07/12/2018 LIMS AUTO INC 65.13 0.00 65.13 AP 00392294 07/12/2018 OFFICE DEPOT 4,778.22 0.00 4,778.22 AP 00392295 07/12/2018 ORKIN PEST CONTROL 245.02 0.00 245.02 AP 00392296 07/12/2018 SAFETY KLEEN SYSTEMS INC 188.56 0.00 188.56 AP 00392297 07/12/2018 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 2,855.29 0.00 2,855.29 AP 00392298 07/12/2018 SNAP ON INDUSTRIAL 48.49 0.00 48.49 AP 00392299 07/12/2018 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS 964.06 0.00 964.06 AP 00392300 07/12/2018 VISTA PAINT 1,474.97 0.00 1,474.97 AP 00392301 07/12/2018 BIBLIOTHECA LLC 11,280.00 0.00 11,280.00 AP 00392302 07/12/2018 DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 305.99 0.00 305.99 AP 00392303 07/12/2018 DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 277.79 0.00 277.79 AP 00392304 07/12/2018 DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 1,883.86 0.00 1,883.86 AP 00392305 07/12/2018 FIRE ETC. 0.00 1,284.23 1,284.23 AP 00392306 07/12/2018 LATREACE, RAINEY 392.00 0.00 392.00 AP 00392307 07/18/2018 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 1,165.37 0.00 1,165.37 AP 00392308 07/18/2018 ABLE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 2,011.35 0.00 2,011.35 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 4 Current Date: 07/24/2018 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 08:36:50 Page 69 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 7/10/2018 through 7/23/2018 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00392309 07/18/2018 ACCELA INC 2,500.00 0.00 2,500.00 AP 00392310 07/18/2018 ADVANCED CHEMICAL TRANSPORT 1,408.00 0.00 1,408.00 AP 00392311 07/18/2018 ALBERT GROVER & ASSOCIATES 9,300.00 0.00 9,300.00 AP 00392312 07/18/2018 ALCORN, RICHARD 20.00 0.00 20.00 AP 00392313 07/18/2018 ALL CITIES TOOLS 691.21 0.00 691.21 AP 00392314 07/18/2018 ALLSTAR FIRE EQUIPMENT INC 0.00 4,699.74 4,699.74 AP 00392315 07/18/2018 ALPHAGRAPHICS 528.87 0.00 528.87 AP 00392316 07/18/2018 ALVARADO, MARIA 117.01 0.00 117.01 AP 00392317 07/18/2018 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 0.00 435.00 435.00 AP 00392318 07/18/2018 ASSI SECURITY 165.00 0.00 165.00 AP 00392319 07/18/2018 ASUNCION, JHONALEE 27.25 0.00 27.25 AP 00392320 07/18/2018 ATTAALIA, JAKLIN, A. 230.00 0.00 230.00 AP 00392321 07/18/2018 AUFBAU CORPORATION 11,254.00 0.00 11,254.00 AP 00392322 07/18/2018 AUTO AND RV SPECIALISTS INC. 171.47 0.00 171.47 AP 00392323 07/18/2018 BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, THE 1,750.00 0.00 1,750.00 AP 00392324 07/18/2018 BARTEL ASSOCIATES LLC 0.00 1,925.00 1,925.00 AP 00392325 07/18/2018 BERRY, SANDRA ELLEN 94.00 0.00 94.00 AP 00392326 07/18/2018 BEST BEST AND KRIEGER 292.50 0.00 292.50 AP 00392327 07/18/2018 BRAUN BLAISING SMITH WYNNE P.C. 62.95 0.00 62.95 AP 00392328 07/18/2018 CAIN, RUTH 110.38 0.00 110.38 AP 00392329 07/18/2018 CALIFORNIA SHOPPING CART RETRIEVAL CORP 915.00 0.00 915.00 AP 00392330 07/18/2018 CAMERON WELDING SUPPLY 94.71 0.00 94.71 AP 00392331 07/18/2018 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 6.34 0.00 6.34 AP 00392332 07/18/2018 CCS ORANGE COUNTY JANITORIAL INC. 4,520.76 0.00 4,520.76 AP 00392333 07/18/2018 CERVANTES, MIGUEL 0.00 270.00 270.00 AP 00392334 07/18/2018 CINTAS CORPORATION #150 1,512.70 223.81 1,736.51 *** AP 00392335 07/18/2018 CLEAN OUT SOURCE 90.00 0.00 90.00 AP 00392336 07/18/2018 COLEY, JASON S. 10.00 0.00 10.00 AP 00392337 07/18/2018 CORELOGIC SOLUTIONS LLC 257.50 0.00 257.50 AP 00392338 07/18/2018 CORODATA MEDIA STORAGE INC 992.10 0.00 992.10 AP 00392339 07/18/2018 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 2,414.21 0.00 2,414.21 AP 00392340 07/18/2018 DAKTRONICS INC 294.38 0.00 294.38 AP 00392341 07/18/2018 EMBROIDME 145.35 0.00 145.35 AP 00392342 07/18/2018 ENNIS PAINT INC. 1,454.63 0.00 1,454.63 AP 00392343 07/18/2018 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 56.34 0.00 56.34 AP 00392344 07/18/2018 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 74.86 0.00 74.86 AP 00392345 07/18/2018 GAAL, JULIE 23.71 0.00 23.71 AP 00392346 07/18/2018 GEORGE HILLS COMPANY 1,079.00 0.00 1,079.00 AP 00392347 07/18/2018 GRAPHICS FACTORY INC. 800.58 0.00 800.58 AP 00392348 07/18/2018 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 1,114.85 0.00 1,114.85 AP 00392349 07/18/2018 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO 3,259.44 0.00 3,259.44 AP 00392350 07/18/2018 HERITAGE EDUCATION GROUP 758.00 0.00 758.00 AP 00392351 07/18/2018 HI WAY SAFETY INC 972.78 0.00 972.78 AP 00392352 07/18/2018 HOLE PUNCH DESIGN 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00392353 07/18/2018 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 645 2,131.74 0.00 2,131.74 AP 00392354 07/18/2018 HOUSE OF RUTH 1,117.63 0.00 1,117.63 AP 00392355 07/18/2018 HOUSE OF RUTH 804.58 0.00 804.58 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 5 Current Date: 07/24/2018 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 08:36:50 Page 70 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 7/10/2018 through 7/23/2018 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00392356 07/18/2018 IDEXX DISTRIBUTION INC 4,883.14 0.00 4,883.14 AP 00392357 07/18/2018 IMEG CORP 24,900.00 0.00 24,900.00 AP 00392358 07/18/2018 INLAND VALLEY EMERGENCY PET CLINIC 1,794.50 0.00 1,794.50 AP 00392359 07/18/2018 JACKS URBAN EATS 118.70 0.00 118.70 AP 00392360 07/18/2018 KC RAPID EDGE INC 359.00 0.00 359.00 AP 00392361 07/18/2018 KNIGHT, AMANDA 49.60 0.00 49.60 AP 00392362 07/18/2018 KVAC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES INC 781.85 0.00 781.85 AP 00392363 07/18/2018 LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC. 4,047.09 0.00 4,047.09 AP 00392364 07/18/2018 LINARES, RUDY 200.00 0.00 200.00 AP 00392365 07/18/2018 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 9,015.00 0.00 9,015.00 AP 00392368 07/18/2018 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 4,843.20 4,460.78 9,303.98 *** AP 00392369 07/18/2018 MAGELLAN ADVISORS LLC 21,477.21 0.00 21,477.21 AP 00392370 07/18/2018 MAIN STREET SIGNS 495.65 0.00 495.65 AP 00392371 07/18/2018 MIDWEST TAPE 612.00 0.00 612.00 AP 00392372 07/18/2018 MIZE, MATTHEW 46.46 0.00 46.46 AP 00392373 07/18/2018 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 672.24 0.00 672.24 AP 00392374 07/18/2018 NATIONAL FIRE FIGHTER WILDLAND 0.00 32.45 32.45 AP 00392375 07/18/2018 NBS 12,740.00 0.00 12,740.00 AP 00392376 07/18/2018 OROZCO, JOE 200.00 0.00 200.00 AP 00392377 07/18/2018 PALACIOS, JENNIFER 67.25 0.00 67.25 AP 00392378 07/18/2018 POLLOCK, LARRY 249.00 0.00 249.00 AP 00392379 07/18/2018 PROMOTIONS TEES & MORE 2,599.80 0.00 2,599.80 AP 00392380 07/18/2018 PUBLIC GROUP OF CA LLC, THE 363.23 0.00 363.23 AP 00392381 07/18/2018 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 6,982.16 0.00 6,982.16 AP 00392382 07/18/2018 RANCHO MALL LLC 13,054.00 0.00 13,054.00 AP 00392383 07/18/2018 RANCHO MALL LLC 6,450.00 0.00 6,450.00 AP 00392384 07/18/2018 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 18.86 0.00 18.86 AP 00392385 07/18/2018 RCEP UNIT #417 3,000.00 0.00 3,000.00 AP 00392386 07/18/2018 REGENCY ENTERPRISES INC 1,839.29 0.00 1,839.29 AP 00392387 07/18/2018 RICHARD WIGHTMAN CONSTRUCTION INC 375.00 0.00 375.00 AP 00392388 07/18/2018 RICHARD WIGHTMAN CONSTRUCTION INC 1,225.00 0.00 1,225.00 AP 00392389 07/18/2018 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 40,435.43 4,344.96 44,780.39 *** AP 00392390 07/18/2018 RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY 1,450.00 0.00 1,450.00 AP 00392391 07/18/2018 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT 6,337.10 0.00 6,337.10 AP 00392392 07/18/2018 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT 2,732.24 0.00 2,732.24 AP 00392393 07/18/2018 SB COUNTY FIRE DEPT 130.00 0.00 130.00 AP 00392394 07/18/2018 SC FUELS 50,802.27 0.00 50,802.27 AP 00392395 07/18/2018 SC FUELS 0.00 3,573.39 3,573.39 AP 00392396 07/18/2018 SECC CORP 15,621.25 0.00 15,621.25 AP 00392397 07/18/2018 SHOETERIA 669.07 0.00 669.07 AP 00392398 07/18/2018 SHRED IT USA LLC 190.95 0.00 190.95 AP 00392399 07/18/2018 SOCAL OFFICE TECHNOLOGIES 854.25 0.00 854.25 AP 00392400 07/18/2018 SOCAL PPE 0.00 3,389.55 3,389.55 AP 00392401 07/18/2018 SOCIAL VOCATIONAL SERVICES 3,734.00 0.00 3,734.00 AP 00392405 07/18/2018 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18,996.01 0.00 18,996.01 AP 00392406 07/18/2018 SPRINT 0.00 121.95 121.95 AP 00392407 07/18/2018 STANDARD FUSEE CORPORATION 0.00 1,356.50 1,356.50 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 6 Current Date: 07/24/2018 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 08:36:50 Page 71 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 7/10/2018 through 7/23/2018 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00392408 07/18/2018 STERLING COFFEE SERVICE 0.00 270.13 270.13 AP 00392409 07/18/2018 STOTZ EQUIPMENT 35,908.95 0.00 35,908.95 AP 00392410 07/18/2018 THOMPSON PLUMBING SUPPLY INC 578.90 0.00 578.90 AP 00392411 07/18/2018 TOVEY/SHULTZ CONSTRUCTION INC 73,433.30 714,682.97 788,116.27 *** AP 00392412 07/18/2018 C V W D 1,509.26 465.71 1,974.97 *** AP 00392416 07/18/2018 C V W D 103,234.86 0.00 103,234.86 AP 00392417 07/18/2018 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 403.91 0.00 403.91 AP 00392418 07/18/2018 UPS 71.52 0.00 71.52 AP 00392419 07/18/2018 VANDERHAWK CONSULTING LLC 17,500.00 0.00 17,500.00 AP 00392420 07/18/2018 VARGAS AND RAMIREZ SPORTS 7,868.34 0.00 7,868.34 AP 00392421 07/18/2018 VERIZON BUSINESS SERVICES 17.56 0.00 17.56 AP 00392426 07/18/2018 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 5,769.83 0.00 5,769.83 AP 00392427 07/18/2018 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 366.06 0.00 366.06 AP 00392428 07/18/2018 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 5,058.25 0.00 5,058.25 AP 00392429 07/18/2018 VICTOR MEDICAL COMPANY 6,965.68 0.00 6,965.68 AP 00392430 07/18/2018 VOHNE LICHE KENNELS INC 125.00 0.00 125.00 AP 00392431 07/18/2018 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 308.02 128.32 436.34 *** AP 00392432 07/18/2018 WELLS, JUDITH 50.14 0.00 50.14 AP 00392433 07/18/2018 WHITE HOUSE PHOTO INC 682.50 0.00 682.50 AP 00392434 07/18/2018 WILLIAMS, DIANE 212.64 0.00 212.64 AP 00392435 07/18/2018 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 53.03 0.00 53.03 AP 00392436 07/18/2018 ACTORS' EQUITY ASSOCIATION 12,231.00 0.00 12,231.00 AP 00392437 07/18/2018 AFLAC GROUP INSURANCE 40.97 0.00 40.97 AP 00392438 07/18/2018 ALONZO, SARAH ELIZABETH 798.00 0.00 798.00 AP 00392439 07/18/2018 ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF FOOTHILL COMMUNITIES 2,328.84 0.00 2,328.84 AP 00392440 07/18/2018 BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS TRAINING INSTITUTE 481.00 0.00 481.00 AP 00392441 07/18/2018 BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS TRAINING INSTITUTE 481.00 0.00 481.00 AP 00392442 07/18/2018 BELTRAN, OSBALDO ALVARADO 648.00 0.00 648.00 AP 00392443 07/18/2018 BLACKBAUD 8,710.56 0.00 8,710.56 AP 00392444 07/18/2018 CACEO 86.00 0.00 86.00 AP 00392445 07/18/2018 CALIFORNIA POOLS 15.56 0.00 15.56 AP 00392446 07/18/2018 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 1,318.48 0.00 1,318.48 AP 00392447 07/18/2018 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 301.05 0.00 301.05 AP 00392448 07/18/2018 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 312.88 0.00 312.88 AP 00392449 07/18/2018 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 100.00 0.00 100.00 AP 00392450 07/18/2018 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 8.44 0.00 8.44 AP 00392451 07/18/2018 CAPIO 225.00 0.00 225.00 AP 00392452 07/18/2018 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 0.00 9.05 9.05 AP 00392453 07/18/2018 CHASING 7 DREAMS 1,092.00 0.00 1,092.00 AP 00392454 07/18/2018 COLD DUCK PRODUCTIONS INC. 1,500.00 0.00 1,500.00 AP 00392455 07/18/2018 CONFIRE JPA 0.00 173,538.50 173,538.50 AP 00392456 07/18/2018 COSTAR REALTY INFORMATION INC 696.00 0.00 696.00 AP 00392457 07/18/2018 CREATIVE BRAIN LEARNING 594.00 0.00 594.00 AP 00392458 07/18/2018 DELANO, LAURA 459.00 0.00 459.00 AP 00392459 07/18/2018 DIRECTV 75.79 0.00 75.79 AP 00392460 07/18/2018 DOMINGUEZ, DESTINIE 639.00 0.00 639.00 AP 00392461 07/18/2018 EASTERDAY, MARK 1,200.00 0.00 1,200.00 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 7 Current Date: 07/24/2018 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 08:36:50 Page 72 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 7/10/2018 through 7/23/2018 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00392462 07/18/2018 EDUCATIONAL CREDIT MANAGEMENT CORP. 10.91 0.00 10.91 AP 00392463 07/18/2018 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 60.00 0.00 60.00 AP 00392464 07/18/2018 FIRST CLASS HEATING & AIR 400.00 0.00 400.00 AP 00392465 07/18/2018 FLEET SERVICES INC. 0.00 801.72 801.72 AP 00392466 07/18/2018 GALE/CENGAGE LEARNING 5,000.00 0.00 5,000.00 AP 00392467 07/18/2018 GIORDANO, MARIANNA 189.00 0.00 189.00 AP 00392468 07/18/2018 GOGOV APPS INC 7,200.00 0.00 7,200.00 AP 00392469 07/18/2018 HILLS PET NUTRITION SALES INC 1,104.20 0.00 1,104.20 AP 00392470 07/18/2018 ICMA 1,400.00 0.00 1,400.00 AP 00392471 07/18/2018 INDERWIESCHE, MATT 1,500.00 0.00 1,500.00 AP 00392472 07/18/2018 INLAND EMPIRE STAGES LTD 951.25 0.00 951.25 AP 00392473 07/18/2018 JOHNNY ALLEN TENNIS ACADEMY 4,576.20 0.00 4,576.20 AP 00392474 07/18/2018 KEITH, JORRY 216.00 0.00 216.00 AP 00392475 07/18/2018 LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS LLC 5,291.57 0.00 5,291.57 AP 00392476 07/18/2018 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 4,500.00 0.00 4,500.00 AP 00392477 07/18/2018 LITTLE, MARC 937.50 0.00 937.50 AP 00392478 07/18/2018 MARQUEZ, EMMANUEL E 1,000.00 0.00 1,000.00 AP 00392479 07/18/2018 MATANGA, JULIE EDWARD 357.00 0.00 357.00 AP 00392480 07/18/2018 MILLER, ASYA 250.00 0.00 250.00 AP 00392481 07/18/2018 MURGUTA, MARISELA 600.00 0.00 600.00 AP 00392482 07/18/2018 NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES 10,610.00 0.00 10,610.00 AP 00392483 07/18/2018 NICHOLS, GARY 833.00 0.00 833.00 AP 00392484 07/18/2018 PARSAC 602,171.00 0.00 602,171.00 AP 00392485 07/18/2018 PRE -PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 78.38 0.00 78.38 AP 00392486 07/18/2018 PUMA, DEBORAH WICKS LA 245.00 0.00 245.00 AP 00392487 07/18/2018 RAGAN COMMUNICATIONS INC 26.95 0.00 26.95 AP 00392488 07/18/2018 RANCHO CUCAMONGA STONEGATE 100.00 0.00 100.00 AP 00392489 07/18/2018 RICHARD WIGHTMAN CONSTRUCTION INC 2,200.00 0.00 2,200.00 AP 00392490 07/18/2018 ROCKSTARS OF TOMORROW, THE 1,000.00 0.00 1,000.00 AP 00392491 07/18/2018 RODMAN, JERII E 180.00 0.00 180.00 AP 00392492 07/18/2018 SAFE -ENTRY TECHNICAL INC 0.00 728.06 728.06 AP 00392493 07/18/2018 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT 209,242.32 0.00 209,242.32 AP 00392494 07/18/2018 SBPEA 1,621.38 0.00 1,621.38 AP 00392495 07/18/2018 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOC OF GOVERNMENTS 17,066.00 0.00 17,066.00 AP 00392496 07/18/2018 TORRES, NICHOLAS REGGIE 180.00 0.00 180.00 AP 00392497 07/18/2018 UNITED WAY 118.00 0.00 118.00 AP 00392498 07/18/2018 VENTEK INTERNATIONAL 2,070.00 0.00 2,070.00 AP 00392499 07/18/2018 VIRTUAL PROJECT MANAGER INC 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00392500 07/18/2018 WALTERS MUSIC AGENCY 1,700.00 0.00 1,700.00 AP 00392501 07/18/2018 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 166.67 4,388.17 4,554.84 *** AP 00392502 07/18/2018 WE TIP INC 8,826.70 0.00 8,826.70 AP 00392503 07/19/2018 LN CURTIS AND SONS 0.00 3,169.03 3,169.03 AP 00392504 07/19/2018 OFFICE DEPOT 3,508.36 0.00 3,508.36 AP 00392505 07/19/2018 OVERDRIVE INC 12,000.00 0.00 12,000.00 AP 00392506 07/19/2018 SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC 2,750.00 0.00 2,750.00 AP 00392507 07/19/2018 VISTA PAINT 64.63 0.00 64.63 AP 00392510 07/19/2018 INLAND EMPIRE PROPERTY SERVICES INC 0.00 37,022.50 37,022.50 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 8 Current Date: 07/24/2018 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 08:36:50 Page 73 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 7/10/2018 through 7/23/2018 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00392511 07/23/2018 CALIFORNIA DIVISION OF THE STATE ARCHITECT 1,138.90 0.00 1,138.90 Total City: $5,634,169.92 Total Fire: $2,975,629.74 Grand Total: , NntP• *** Check Number includes both City and Fire District expenditures User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 9 Current Date: 07/24/2018 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 08:36:50 Page 74 DATE: August 1, 2018 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Gianfranco Laurie, Senior Civil Engineer Natalie Avila, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF AN INCREASE IN CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY AND AN ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATION OF $90,000 FROM THE TRANSPORTATION FUND (FUND 124) FOR THE FREEWAYAND ARTERIAL SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION PROJECT. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council: 1. Authorize additional construction contingency in the amount of $90,000 to Elecnor Belco Electric, Inc., for the Freeway and Arterial Signal Synchronization Project; and 2. Authorize an additional appropriation in the amount of $90,000 from the Transportation Fund (Fund 124) Fund Balance to cover additional project costs. BACKGROUND: On October 18, 2017, the City Council awarded a construction contract to Elecnor Belco Electric, Inc. (Belco) in the amount of $566,799 for the Freeway and Arterial Signal Synchronization Project. This project will provide communications paths to enable the monitoring, retiming, and coordination of the cities traffic signals in the vicinity of the Haven Avenue, Base Line Road, and Foothill Boulevard Freeway Interchanges and upgrade communications equipment at the State-ownded interchange traffic signals along with upgrades to the Caltrans Traffic Management Center (TMC) to enable future communication between the City and Caltrans TMCs when necessary when software become available. Additionally, the City Council authorized a 10% contingency in the amount of $56,680 to address unforeseen construction related incidentals. A total combined cost of $819,120 was anticipated for this project which included design, construction, contingency, equipment, implementation, testing and reporting. Therefore, a net appropriation in the amount of $819,120 from the Air Quality Improvement Fund (Fund 105) and Transportation Fund (124) into the project accounts were approved in order to proceed with construction. A copy of the October 18, 2017, City Council Staff Report is held on file with the City Clerk's office. ANALYSIS: After awarding the construction contract to Belco, the City received final permitting documents from the Page 75 California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) for portions of proposed work that encroached into their jurisdiction. As a contingent condition of approval for an encroachment permit, the City was required to revise the proposed scope of work in accordance with Caltrans' latest policies and procedures. These revisions submitted by Caltrans have resulted in a significant change to Belco's agreed upon scope of work for the project. Such changes include additional conduit, fiber optic cable, innerduct with tracer wire, fiber switches, pull boxes, permitting, inspection and an increase in the construction bonds. At this time, one change order totaling $7,124 has been reviewed and approved by staff. A change order request to address Caltrans' conditions is currently under review and would exceed the remaining balance of the approved project contingency. To provide authority to continue negotiating change orders and avoid delays in finalizing the project, an increase in the amount of $90,000 for a total project contingency of $146,680 or 26% of the contract award is necessary. Staff has reviewed the proposed change order request for completeness and accuracy for the materials, equipment and labor necessary to complete the work. On that basis, staff is recommending that the City Council to increase the construction contingency in the amount of $90,000 in order for Belco to proceed with construction based on Caltrans revised scope of work. FISCAL IMPACT: Additional funds from the Transportation Fund (Fund 124) Fund Balance will need to be appropriated into the following project account in order to cover the anticipated construction costs. Sufficient fund balance exists to cover the additional costs: Account No. Funding Source Description Amount 11245650/1900124-0 (Capital Projects) Transportation (124) Fwy/Arterial Sync Ph 1 $90,000 COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This Project addresses the City Council Goal of providing for Public Safety by enhancing traffic management operations, which improves maintenance to ensure that traffic signals are functioning properly. The Project also addresses the City Council Goal of enhancing Premier Community Status by improving traffic flows resulting in the reduction of fuel consumption and vehicle emissions. Page 76 DATE: August 1, 2018 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Brian Sandona, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF AN IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR THE RESORT PARKWAY STREET IMPROVEMENTS RELATED TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 20073 ON THE NORTH SIDE OF 4TH STREET BETWEEN MILLIKEN AVENUE AND CLEVELAND AVENUE SUBMITTED BY SC RANCHO DEVELOPMENT CORP. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council: 1. Approve the Improvement Agreement with SC Rancho Development Corp., for the Resort Parkway street improvements related to Tentative Tract No. 20073, and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement; and 2. Accept Improvement Securities submitted by SC Rancho Development Corp., to guarantee construction of the public improvements required for Tentative Tract No. 20073. BACKGROUND: On August 23, 2017, the Planning Commission approved Tentative Tract No. 20073 for the subdivision of about 84 acres into ten (10) lots and one (1) lettered lot within the Empire Lakes Specific Plan, Planning Area 1, located north of 4th Street, south of 6th Street, west of Milliken Avenue, and east of Utica/Cleveland Avenues. Tentative Tract No. 20073 was approved subject to a condition that certain public improvements be conditioned on the first development within the subdivision including street, storm drain, and landscaping improvements. ANALYSIS: In order to meet certain contractual obligations, the developer, SC Rancho Development Corp. is phasing the completion of public improvements required for Tentative Tract No. 20073. At this time, the developer plans to construct public street improvements along The Resort Parkway from approximately 300 feet north of 6th Street to 4th Street. The developer has submitted an Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of these public improvements in the following amounts: Page 77 Faithful Performance Bond $1,067,200 Labor and Materials Bond $1,067,200 FISCAL IMPACT: None. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Enhancing Premier Community Status through the construction of high quality public improvements associated with the development of Tentative Tract No. 20073. ATTACHMENTS: Description Attachment 1 - Vicinity Map Page 78 TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 20073 VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE Rancho Cucamonga Superior Court W 5�n,r:r;,Iw•n � Upland Chrlstian Mdle+wrnCt 00dr� Academy � Adults Sports Park: nchp s 7ack berry 7r lents si�iw'i W. United States m = Postal Service _ e n � Arrow Rout€ Arrow Route Arrow FAoute F o Arconic Fastening � Systems &Rings a T a1- ar ciligr Pr¢ 26th 5T a y n m e Rancho Cucamonga ac s MetrallnkTrain, ROCHESTER 9 s :t •4-n $1 __ ___ b E 70,S1 — T,h St nst _ = St71arr1D:�le � � n - m m a a `m In 6th st 4th St 61h c s a b age 4n a Green 4 A a � Snn Marlon SL a Site /� rh Sr rrl rr5dcfr5 $i J I t e 3 a` �/ A " z Costco Wholesale Q f P The Reserve at Empire ra _e m Empire A ,Lakes Apartments T . Lake Homes Fourth St Fourth SSI } a Edwards arrlario Palace ' 1� Target 22 IMAX & RPX q 9 AMC DINE -IN Q 4 Ontario Mills 30 co nCv!lrg �, M arketp l ace At P '0141. Park Centre �. � Ifark Citizens Business � Ontario Center = I!ti n N ATTACHMENT 1 Page 79 DATE: August 1, 2018 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Brian Sandona, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF AN IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR THE 4TH STREET IMPROVEMENTS RELATED TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 20073 ON THE NORTH SIDE OF 4TH STREET BETWEEN MILLIKEN AVENUE AND CLEVELAND AVENUE SUBMITTED BY SC RANCHO DEVELOPMENT CORP. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council: 1. Approve the Improvement Agreement with SC Rancho Development Corp., for the 4th Street Improvements related to Tentative Tract No. 20073, and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement; and 2. Accept Improvement Securities submitted by SC Rancho Development Corp., to guarantee construction of public improvements required for Tentative Tract No. 20073. BACKGROUND: On August 23, 2017, the Planning Commission approved Tentative Tract No. 20073 for the subdivision of about 84 acres into ten (10) lots and one (1) lettered lot within the Empire Lakes Specific Plan, Planning Area 1, located north of 4th Street, south of 6th Street, west of Milliken Avenue, and east of Utica/Cleveland Avenues. Tentative Tract No. 20073 was approved subject to a condition that certain public improvements be conditioned on the first development within the subdivision including street, storm drain, and landscaping improvements. ANALYSIS: In order to meet certain contractual obligations, the developer, SC Rancho Development Corp. is phasing the completion of public improvements required for Tentative Tract No. 20073. At this time, the developer plans to construct public street improvements along the north side of 4th Street between Cleveland Avenue and Empire Court. The developer has submitted an Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of these public improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond $555,700 Labor and Materials Bond $555,700 Page 80 FISCAL IMPACT: None. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Enhancing Premier Community Status through the associated with the development of Tentative Tract No ATTACHMENTS: Description Attachment 1 - Vicinity Map construction of high quality public improvements 20073. Page 81 TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 20073 VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE Rancho Cucamonga Superior Court W 5en,,:r;rw•n � Upland Chrlstian Mdle+wrnCt 00dr� Academy � Adults Sports Park: nchp s 7ack berry 7r lents si�iw�i W. United States m = Postal Service _ e n � Arrow Rout€ Arrow Route Arrow ROLIte F o Arcanic Fastening � Systems &Rings a T a1- ar ciligr Pr¢ 26th 5T a y n m e Rancho Cucamonga ac s MetrollnkTrain, ROCHESTER 9 s :t •4-n $1 __ ---- 70,S1 __7tli5T T,h Stst n_ a a `m In 6th st 6th St 4th St 61h c w s a b Village an the Green 4 m s 3 Snn Marlon SL a Site /� rh Sr rrl rr5dcfr5 $moi J I t ie a ti x �/ `ro f The Reserve at Empire Costco Wholesale Q ra _e m Ironwood at Empire A ,,Lakes Apartments esy Lukes rn met Fourth St Fourth SSI a Edwards arrlario Palace ' 1� Target 22 IMAX & RPX P q 9 AMC DINE -IN Q 4 Ontario Mills 30 co nCv!lrg �, M arketp l ace At P '0141. Park Centre �. � Ifark Citizens Business � Ontario Center = ..:,_ I!ti n N ATTACHMENT 1 Page 82 DATE: August 1, 2018 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Brian Sandona, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF AN IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR THE 6TH STREET IMPROVEMENTS RELATED TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 20073 ON THE NORTH SIDE OF 4TH STREET BETWEEN MILLIKEN AVENUE AND CLEVELAND AVENUE SUBMITTED BY SC RANCHO DEVELOPMENT CORP. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council: 1. Approve the Improvement Agreement with SC Rancho Development Corp., for the 6th Street Improvements related to Tentative Tract No. 20073, and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement; and 2. Accept Improvement Securities submitted by SC Rancho Development Corp., to guarantee construction of public improvements required for Tentative Tract No. 20073. BACKGROUND: On August 23, 2017, the Planning Commission approved Tentative Tract No. 20073 for the subdivision of about 84 acres into ten (10) lots and one (1) lettered lot within the Empire Lakes Specific Plan, Planning Area 1, located north of 4th Street, south of 6th Street, west of Milliken Avenue, and east of Utica/Cleveland Avenues. Tentative Tract No. 20073 was approved subject to a condition that certain public improvements be conditioned on the first development within the subdivision including street, storm drain, and landscaping improvements. ANALYSIS: In order to meet certain contractual obligations, the developer, SC Rancho Development Corp. is phasing the completion of public improvements required for Tentative Tract No. 20073. At this time, the developer plans to construct public street improvements along 6th Street from Cleveland Avenue to approximately 1,800 feet easterly. The developer, has submitted an Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of these public improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond $1,200,000 Labor and Materials Bond $1,200,000 Page 83 FISCAL IMPACT: None. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Enhancing Premier Community Status through the construction of high quality public improvements associated with the development of Tentative Tract No. 20073. ATTACHMENTS: Description Attachment 1 - Vicinity Map Page 84 TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 20073 VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE Rancho Cucamonga � � L°`^el5l ei•ti.SVrry.� m � r g a � Superior Court71 W 5en,,:r;r w•n Upland Chrlstian in Mdin wrn Ct Academy c�vdr� � Adults Sports Park: nchp�y lents 9 United States � � s si�iw-i W.7ack m berry 7r Postal Service = _ n � e Arrow Rout€ Arrow Route Arrow FAoute F o Arcanic Fastening � Systems &Rings a T acona ar ciligr Pr¢ 26th 5T y Je rEWA jm"V, a p n m Rancho Cucamonga_, e ac s MetrallnkTrain� ROCHESTER 9 s :t A-. S, -- ---- --7t1i51 70,S1 T,h St n st 6 _ a `m a 6th St 4th St fittr- c Vrllage an the Green 4 s a 3 Snn Marin -SL a C rh Sr rrl rr5dcfr5 $moi Site n y a `ro Costco Wholesale Q f P The Reserve at Empire r Ironwood at Empire A ,Lakes �/ Apartments `m Lakes Apartment Homes Fourth St Fourth SSI } L Edwards arttario Palace ' Target 9 22 IMAX & RPX q AMC DINE -IN Q 4 Ontario Mills 30 co nCv!lrg �, Park Centre Ifark M arketp l ace At P �. '0141. � Citizens Business � Ontario Center = ..:,_ I!ti n N ATTACHMENT 1 Page 85 DATE: August 1, 2018 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Brian Sandona, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE PARCEL MAP 19823, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO THE LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR PARCEL MAP 19823, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF 4TH STREET AND UTICA AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY CP LOGISTICS UTICA, LLC,ADELEWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council approve Parcel Map 19823, accepting the subject agreement and security, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos.1 and 6, and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause said map to record. BACKGROUND: On December 13, 2017, the Planning Commission approved Tentative Parcel Map 19823 for the division of 13.96 acres into 3 parcels in conjunction with a proposed industrial development consisting of 3 industrial logistics buildings located on the north side of 4th Street and west of Utica Avenue. Tentative Parcel Map 19823 was approved subject to a condition that certain public improvements be constructed. The Developer, CP LOGISTICS UTICA, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, has submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond $104,700.00 Labor and Materials Bond $104,700.00 Monumentation (Cash Deposit) $2,915.00 ANALYSIS: Page 86 The parcel map has been reviewed and found in substantial conformance with the approved Tentative Parcel Map and any approved amendments. Further, the improvement agreement and securities have been found to be sufficient to ensure construction of the required public improvements. FISCAL IMPACT: This item will annex the subject property into Landscape Maintenance District LMD 3B and Street Lighting Districts SLD 1 and SLD 6, providing additional revenue in the following amounts to these districts. LMD 3B $3,976.76 SLD 1 $ 500.76 SLD 6 $ 724.23 Further, this development will install 17 trees and 4 street lights that will be maintained by the districts. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: These agreements, securities, and the annexations, will secure the construction of future infrastructure which will Enhance the Premier Status of the Community. ATTACHMENTS: Description Attachment 1 - Vicinity Map Attachment 2 - LMD 3B Resolution Attachment 3 - SLD 1 Resolution Attachment 4 - SLD 6 Resolution Page 87 PARCEL 19823 VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE � S . ARCO a �o 6#h St 4lnlvemal Technical Instltule Trademark St WaBa Crlll Erlt&prme :l Q -Ra roc ha camonga Fourth St lub Apartmerits scours St Goca-Colo Battling 6th St _C u D K r# iEFIP Project Site Fourth St Fourth Sl m Vintage Apartments Carnden Landmark Apartments fi Conco4rs St z z rp rb ro n fn 6th Lot F 0- Citizens Businc °�, Bartk Arc N ATTACHMENT 1 Page 88 RESOLUTION NO. 18 -XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B (COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL MAINTENANCE DISTRICT) FOR SUBTPM19823 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the "Act", said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B (Commercial Industrial Maintenance District) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the Act authorize the annexation of additional territory to the District; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation of resolutions, and assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the Act related to the annexation of territory to the District, Article XIII D of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIII D") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the District on the territory proposed to be annexed to such District; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the District in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act to the annexation of the Territory to the District and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the District; and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act and/or Article XII I D applicable to the authorization to levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization to levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly agreed for themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns that: (1) The proportionate special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the District Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance and operation expenses of the Improvements; Resolution No. 18 -XXX — Page 1 o 5 ATTACHMENT 2 Page 89 (2) The proposed annual assessment does not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit from the Improvements conferred on each parcel in the Territory. (3) Only the special benefits derived or to be derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements have been included in the proposed annual assessment. WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the District and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation the Territory to the District, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the District, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 1st day of August 2018. Resolution No. 18 -XXX — Page 2of 5 Page 90 Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property to be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: CP Logistics Utica, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company The legal description of the Property is: THAT PORTION OF PARCELS 3 AND 4 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 9498 AND PORTIONS OF TRADEMARK PARKWAY SOUTH AND WINSTON AVENUE, AS VACATED BY RESOLUTION NO. 16-204 OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, RECORDED DECEMBER 20, 2016 AS DOCUMENT NO. 2016- 0556661 MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE CENTERLINE INTERSECTION OF 4TH STREET AND UTICA AVENUE, AS DEPICTED ON SAID PARCEL MAP NO. 9498; THENCE NORTH 89 DEG 31'27" WEST, 594.60 FEET ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF SAID STREET TO THE CENTERLINE INTERSECTION OF 4TH STREET AND WINSTON AVENUE, AS DEPICTED ON SAID PARCEL MAP NO. 9498; THENCE NORTH 34 DEG 17'50" WEST, 73.04 FEET TO AN INTERSECTING POINT OF THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LANDS VACATED BY THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA WITH A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT 656.98 FEET EASTERLY OF THE CENTERLINE OF IMPROVEMENT FOR HAVEN AVENUE, AS SHOWN ON SAID PARCEL MAP NO. 9498, SAID POINT BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 00 DEG 15'02" WEST, 545.20 FEET ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 00 DEG 15'02" WEST, 658.61 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 3, SAID POINT BEING THE BEGINNING OF A NON -TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 309.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 02 DEG 36'05" WEST; THENCE EASTERLY AND SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE AND ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL 3 AN ARC LENGTH OF 548.78 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 101 DEG 45'26" TO THE NORTHERLY TERMINUS OF LANDS VACATED BY THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; THENCE RADIAL TO SAID CURVE, SOUTH 80 DEG 50'39" EAST, 82.00 FEET TO THE NORTHEASTERLY TERMINUS OF LANDS VACATED BY THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, SAID POINT BEING THE BEGINNING OF A NON -TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 391.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 80 DEG 50'39" WEST; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE AND ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 4 AN ARC LENGTH OF 10.38 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 01 DEG 31,151, TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 24.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 82 DEG 21'54" WEST; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE AND ALONG THE WESTERLY AND NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 4 AN ARC LENGTH OF 34.70 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 82 DEG 50'27"; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEG 31'27" EAST, 160.60 FEET ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL 4 TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 24.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE AND ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 4 AN ARC LENGTH OF 37.39 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 89 DEG 16'01"; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEG 15'26" EAST, 819.50 FEET ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF PARCEL 4 TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 24.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE AND ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 4 AN ARC LENGTH OF 38.01 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90 DEG 43'59"; THENCE NORTH 89 DEG 31'27" WEST, 584.18 FEET ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL 4 AND ALONG AFOREMENTIONED LANDS VACATED BY THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. Assessor's Parcels Numbers of the Property: 0210-081-43-0000 Resolution No. 18 -XXX — Page 3of 5 Page 91 Exhibit B Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2017/2018 Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B (Commercial Industrial Maintenance District): Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B (Commercial Industrial Maintenance District) (the "Maintenance District") represents landscape sites throughout the Commercial/Industrial Maintenance District. The various landscape sites that are maintained by this district consist of median islands, parkways, street trees and entry monuments. Proposed Additions to the Improvements for Project PM 19823: 17 Street Trees Resolution No. 18 -XXX — Page 4of 5 Page 92 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2017/2018 Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B (Commercial Industrial Maintenance District): The rate per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) is $282.24 for the fiscal year 2017/18. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B (Commercial Industrial Maintenance District) for SUBTPM19823: Land Use Basis EBU Factor* Rate per EBU* Non -Residential Acre 1.00 $282.24 The proposed annual assessment for the property described in Exhibit A is as follows: 14.09 Acres x 1.00 EBU Factor x $282.24 Rate per EBU = $3,976.76 Annual Assessment Resolution No. 18 -XXX — Page 5of 5 Page 93 RESOLUTION NO. 18 -XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS) FOR SUBTPM19823 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the "Act", said special maintenance district known and designated as Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the Act authorize the annexation of additional territory to the District; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation of resolutions, and assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the Act related to the annexation of territory to the District, Article XIII D of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIII D") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the District on the territory proposed to be annexed to such District; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the District in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act to the annexation of the Territory to the District and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the District; and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act and/or Article XIII D applicable to the authorization to levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization to levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and Resolution No. 18 -XXX — Page 1 of 5 ATTACHMENT 3 Page 94 WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly agreed for themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns that: (1) The proportionate special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the District Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance and operation expenses of the Improvements; (2) The proposed annual assessment does not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit from the Improvements conferred on each parcel in the Territory. (3) Only the special benefits derived or to be derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements have been included in the proposed annual assessment. WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the District and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. C. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation the Territory to the District, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the District, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 1st day of August 2018. Resolution No. 18 -XXX — Page 2 of 5 Page 95 Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property to be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: CP Logistics Utica, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company The legal description of the Property is: THAT PORTION OF PARCELS 3 AND 4 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 9498 AND PORTIONS OF TRADEMARK PARKWAY SOUTH AND WINSTON AVENUE, AS VACATED BY RESOLUTION NO. 16-204 OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, RECORDED DECEMBER 20, 2016 AS DOCUMENT NO. 2016- 0556661 MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE CENTERLINE INTERSECTION OF 4TH STREET AND UTICA AVENUE, AS DEPICTED ON SAID PARCEL MAP NO. 9498; THENCE NORTH 89 DEG 31'27" WEST, 594.60 FEET ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF SAID STREET TO THE CENTERLINE INTERSECTION OF 4TH STREET AND WINSTON AVENUE, AS DEPICTED ON SAID PARCEL MAP NO. 9498; THENCE NORTH 34 DEG 17'50" WEST, 73.04 FEET TO AN INTERSECTING POINT OF THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LANDS VACATED BY THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA WITH A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT 656.98 FEET EASTERLY OF THE CENTERLINE OF IMPROVEMENT FOR HAVEN AVENUE, AS SHOWN ON SAID PARCEL MAP NO. 9498, SAID POINT BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 00 DEG 15'02" WEST, 545.20 FEET ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 00 DEG 15'02" WEST, 658.61 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 3, SAID POINT BEING THE BEGINNING OF A NON -TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 309.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 02 DEG 36'05" WEST; THENCE EASTERLY AND SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE AND ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL 3 AN ARC LENGTH OF 548.78 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 101 DEG 45'26" TO THE NORTHERLY TERMINUS OF LANDS VACATED BY THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; THENCE RADIAL TO SAID CURVE, SOUTH 80 DEG 50'39" EAST, 82.00 FEET TO THE NORTHEASTERLY TERMINUS OF LANDS VACATED BY THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, SAID POINT BEING THE BEGINNING OF A NON -TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 391.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 80 DEG 50'39" WEST; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE AND ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 4 AN ARC LENGTH OF 10.38 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 01 DEG 31,15" TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 24.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 82 DEG 21'54" WEST; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE AND ALONG THE WESTERLY AND NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 4 AN ARC LENGTH OF 34.70 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 82 DEG 50'27"; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEG 31'27" EAST, 160.60 FEET ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL 4 TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 24.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE AND ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 4 AN ARC LENGTH OF 37.39 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 89 DEG 16'01"; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEG 15'26" EAST, 819.50 FEET ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF PARCEL 4 TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 24.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE AND ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 4 AN ARC LENGTH OF 38.01 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90 DEG 43'59"; THENCE NORTH 89 DEG 31'27" WEST, 584.18 FEET ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL 4 AND ALONG AFOREMENTIONED LANDS VACATED BY THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. Assessor's Parcels Numbers of the Property: 0210-081-43-0000 Resolution No. 18 -XXX — Page 3 of 5 Page 96 Exhibit B Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2017/2018 Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets): Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets) (the "Maintenance District") is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. These sites consist of several non-contiguous areas throughout the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City. Proposed Additions to the Improvements for Project PM 19823: 4 LED Street Lights Resolution No. 18 -XXX — Page 4 of 5 Page 97 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2017/2018 Street Light Maintenance District No.1 (Arterial Streets): The rate per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2017/18. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No.1 (Arterial Streets) for SUBTPM19823: Land Use Basis EBU Factor* Rate per EBU* Single Family Residential Parcel 1.00 $17.77 Multi -Family Residential Parcel 1.00 17.77 Non -Residential Acre 2.00 17.77 The proposed annual assessment for the property described in Exhibit A is as follows: 14.09 Acres x 2.00 EBU Factor x $17.77 Rate per EBU = $500.76 Annual Assessment Resolution No. 18 -XXX — Page 5 of 5 Page 98 RESOLUTION NO. 18 -XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL) FOR SUBTPM19823 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the "Act", said special maintenance district known and designated as Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial/Industrial)(the "District"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the Act authorize the annexation of additional territory to the District; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation of resolutions, and assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the Act related to the annexation of territory to the District, Article XIII D of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIII D") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the District on the territory proposed to be annexed to such District; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the District in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act to the annexation of the Territory to the District and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the District; and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act and/or Article XIII D applicable to the authorization to levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization to levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly agreed for themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns that: (1) The proportionate special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the District Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance and operation expenses of the Improvements; Resolution No. 18 -XXX — Page 1 of 5 ATTACHMENT 4 Page 99 (2) The proposed annual assessment does not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit from the Improvements conferred on each parcel in the Territory. (3) Only the special benefits derived or to be derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements have been included in the proposed annual assessment. WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the District and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation the Territory to the District, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the District, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 1st day of August 2018. Resolution No. 18 -XXX — Page 2 of 5 Page 100 Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property to be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: CP Logistics Utica, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company The legal description of the Property is: THAT PORTION OF PARCELS 3 AND 4 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 9498 AND PORTIONS OF TRADEMARK PARKWAY SOUTH AND WINSTON AVENUE, AS VACATED BY RESOLUTION NO. 16-204 OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, RECORDED DECEMBER 20, 2016 AS DOCUMENT NO. 2016- 0556661 MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE CENTERLINE INTERSECTION OF 4TH STREET AND UTICA AVENUE, AS DEPICTED ON SAID PARCEL MAP NO. 9498; THENCE NORTH 89 DEG 31'27" WEST, 594.60 FEET ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF SAID STREET TO THE CENTERLINE INTERSECTION OF 4TH STREET AND WINSTON AVENUE, AS DEPICTED ON SAID PARCEL MAP NO. 9498; THENCE NORTH 34 DEG 17'50" WEST, 73.04 FEET TO AN INTERSECTING POINT OF THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LANDS VACATED BY THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA WITH A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT 656.98 FEET EASTERLY OF THE CENTERLINE OF IMPROVEMENT FOR HAVEN AVENUE, AS SHOWN ON SAID PARCEL MAP NO. 9498, SAID POINT BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 00 DEG 15'02" WEST, 545.20 FEET ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 00 DEG 15'02" WEST, 658.61 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 3, SAID POINT BEING THE BEGINNING OF A NON -TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 309.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 02 DEG 36'05" WEST; THENCE EASTERLY AND SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE AND ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL 3 AN ARC LENGTH OF 548.78 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 101 DEG 45'26" TO THE NORTHERLY TERMINUS OF LANDS VACATED BY THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; THENCE RADIAL TO SAID CURVE, SOUTH 80 DEG 50'39" EAST, 82.00 FEET TO THE NORTHEASTERLY TERMINUS OF LANDS VACATED BY THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, SAID POINT BEING THE BEGINNING OF A NON -TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 391.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 80 DEG 50'39" WEST; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE AND ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 4 AN ARC LENGTH OF 10.38 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 01 DEG 31 '15" TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 24.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 82 DEG 21'54" WEST; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE AND ALONG THE WESTERLY AND NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 4 AN ARC LENGTH OF 34.70 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 82 DEG 50'27"; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEG 31'27" EAST, 160.60 FEET ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL 4 TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 24.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE AND ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 4 AN ARC LENGTH OF 37.39 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 89 DEG 16'01"; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEG 15'26" EAST, 819.50 FEET ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF PARCEL 4 TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 24.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE AND ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 4 AN ARC LENGTH OF 38.01 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90 DEG 43'59"; THENCE NORTH 89 DEG 31'27" WEST, 584.18 FEET ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL 4 AND ALONG AFOREMENTIONED LANDS VACATED BY THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. Assessor's Parcels Numbers of the Property: 0210-081-43-0000 Resolution No. 18 -XXX — Page 3 of 5 Page 101 Exhibit B Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2017/2018 Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial/Industrial): Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (the "Maintenance District") is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on commercial and industrial streets throughout the City but excluding those areas already in a local maintenance district. Generally, this area encompasses the industrial area of the City south of Foothill Boulevard The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on industrial or commercial streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on industrial or commercial streets generally south of Foothill Boulevard. Proposed additions to the Improvements for Project SUBTPM19823: 0 Street Lights Resolution No. 18 -XXX — Page 4 of 5 Page 102 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2017/2018 Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial/Industrial): The rate per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) is $51.40 for the fiscal year 2017/18. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial/Industrial) for SUBTPM19823: Land Use Basis EBU Factor* Rate per EBU* Commercial/ Industrial Acre 1.00 $51.40 The proposed annual assessment for the property described in Exhibit A is as follows: 14.09 Parcels x 1.00 EBU Factor x $51.40 Rate per EBU = $724.23 Annual Assessment Resolution No. 18 -XXX — Page 5 of 5 Page 103 DATE: August 1, 2018 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Ed Diaz, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO ACCEPT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS EAST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE AND NORTH OF ARROW ROUTE RELATED TO TRACT 18870-1 AS COMPLETE, FILE THE NOTICE OF COMPLETION AND AUTHORIZE RELEASE OF BONDS. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council: 1. Approve and accept the public improvements required for the development of Tract 18870-1 and authorize the City Engineer to file the appropriate Notice of Completion; 2. Release Faithful Performance Bond No. 024053975 and accept Maintenance Bond No. 024053975-M for the associated public improvements; and 3. Authorize the City Engineer to approve the release of the Maintenance Bond one year following the filing of the Notice of Completion if the improvements remain free from defects in material and workmanship. BACKGROUND: The Final Map of Tract No. 18870-1 was approved by the City Council on May 21, 2014 along with an improvement agreement and acceptance of securities to ensure the construction of off-site public street, landscape, and storm drain improvements located east of Etiwanda Avenue on the north side of Arrow Route. ANALYSIS: All public improvements required of this development have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The public improvements will be re -inspected in approximately nine months to ensure they remain in good order prior to release of the maintenance bond. Prior to construction of the public improvements the developer, Lennar Homes of California, Inc., submitted Faithful Performance Bond No. 024053975 in the amount of $ 3,512,500 to ensure satisfactory completion of the improvements. With the completion of the improvements this bond is no longer required and the developer has submitted Maintenance Bond No. 024053975-M to secure maintenance of the improvements through the one-year warranty period. Page 104 FISCAL IMPACT: None. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Enhancing Premier Community Status through the construction of high quality public improvements associated with the development of this tract. ATTACHMENTS: Description Attachment 1 - Vicinity Map Page 105 TRACT 18870-1 Vicinity Map Historic Rte 66 Historic Rle 66 6 TO x # d `g w U) o rs m D a a K ro m m O� Arrow Routes Arrow Route Arm", Arrow Route JetsM Blvd ° fl Whlttrarn Ave Whlttram Ave 21 Q dY StC� N F rtJt � O y�� '� � Etiwanda Generating Station m gape St Auto Club Speedwoyfj 6Lh r Q Cu N if. 3 rip f5th St m i c � b m+ +V v -U Q � � t n 19 19 rQwth St ® Fourth $t Fourtfi $t Sari 9emardino Ave San BernaidlnC Ave m Rome Depot Regional o a d AC DINE-INrf4 Distribution Center rla Mills 30 Cu L'PnCU4UsSt O n )ntaria MiIIsC) p _ m Valley Blvd p Mills Pkwy Ontario Mills Pkwy Valley Blvd E Airport tir E Airport Dr glover Awe Slower Ave cn ® } n m a FONTANA a X n m i ® GATEWAY m +� Y Y rn E Sana Aria $1 E Santa Ana $t Santo Arta Ave N ATTACHMENT 1 Page 106 DATE: August 1, 2018 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Eduardo Diaz, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO ACCEPT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AT 8628 & 8604 HICKORY AVENUE, BETWEEN ARROW ROUTE AND WHITTRAM AVENUE RELATED TO CASE NO. DRC2016-00466 AS COMPLETE, FILE THE NOTICE OF COMPLETION AND AUTHORIZE RELEASE OF BONDS. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council: 1. Approve and accept the public improvements required for the development of Case No. DRC2016- 00466 and authorize the City Engineer to file the appropriate Notice of Completion; 2. Release Faithful Performance Bond #674027485 and accept Maintenance Bond #19059864 for the associated public improvements; and 3. Authorize the City Engineer to approve the release of the Maintenance Bond one year following the filing of the Notice of Completion if the improvements remain free from defects in material and workmanship. BACKGROUND: On July 19, 2017, the City Council authorized the City Engineer to rescind an existing improvement agreement and allow the release of securities related to Case No. DRC2012-01065. This facilitated the sale of the subject property and the ultimate development of a 215,600 square foot warehouse buidling that had been approved by the Planning Commission on February 22, 2017 (Case No. DRC2016-00466). The new development was conditioned to construct certain public improvements as part of the project's development and entered into a new improvement agreement and provided the necessary securities to finalize the construction of those public improvements. ANALYSIS: All public improvements required of this development have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The public improvements will be re -inspected in approximately nine months to ensure they remain in good order prior to release of the maintenance bond. Prior to construction of the public improvements the developer, Hickory Avenue Industrial Owner, L.P., submitted Faithful Performance Bond No. 674027485 in the amount of $ 237,000 to ensure satisfactory completion of the improvements. With the completion of the improvements this bond is no longer required and the developer has submitted Maintenance Bond No. 19059864 to secure maintenance of the Page 107 improvements through the one-year warranty period. FISCAL IMPACT: None. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Enhancing Premier Community Status through the construction of high quality public improvements associated with the development of thisvTrurp oject. ATTACHMENTS: Description Attachment 1 — Vicinity Map Page 108 Case No. DRC2016-00466 Vicinity Map N ATTACHMENT 1 Page 109 Homecoming T c•,,� cr s:�s Qtr a F £ ti at Terra Vista w Bass Fra ShapsQ Miller Ove o J m c. a d n a Victoria Gardens 0 w a 4'a. ro e rya, dflr chu,c" S` °sa Dr ® Gartiu or �'1.lherty Pk'+r't S �� Hs5toricRte66 Hist -:r: Rte 55 E F041h111 Sled T n_ a n ? y D Arrow Route :,rrow Route Arrow Rouse Arrow Route Arra Svc Site glvd b wru 3 WhltlramAve YJhittrarnAve Kaiser ® 8th Stn w . Mei a- Etiwanda 0 m Generati n g Statlo n Nape S1 I ; Auto Club Speedway 15 v �, rrns7 a b 6th St @ D N Ran o n t a m � m n Fourlh St ® Fourth Sl Fourth St San Bernardino Ave San Bernardino Ave a Home Depot Regional ANICDINE IN Ds Distribution Center g ntarlo Mills 30 CmcowsSt a z a a n Ontario Mills C) p m ro gj Valley 3Iva o Mills Pkvey Ontario Mills Pkwy Valley Blvd Vallee e m E Airport Dr E Alrport Ur 54over Ave Slaver Ave Slgt'e FONTANA h n ° m m GATEWAY p A E Santa Ana St E Santa Ana St Senna Ana Ave San N ATTACHMENT 1 Page 109 DATE: August 1, 2018 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Jarrod Alexander, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENT NO. 04 RENEWING THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENTS FOR J&S STRIPING COMPANY, INC. (CO#15-060) FOR STREET STRIPING AND PAVEMENT MARKING MAINTENANCE. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council approve Amendment No. 04, for the renewal of the Professional Services Agreement with J&S Striping Company, Inc. for street striping and pavement marking maintenance, (C0#1 5-060). BACKGROUND: The City has completed the fourth year of our annual "Street Striping and Pavement Marking Maintenance" contract with J&S Striping Company, I nc. The current contract was competitively bid in 2015 and provided for yearly extensions (for a maximum of 7 years) based on acceptable performance. ANALYSIS: This company has provided good service and in a timely manner, and staff is satisfied with the quality of their work. J&S Striping Company, Inc. has indicated their willingness to continue providing services for fiscal year 2018/2019 with no increase in fees. Contractor and City would like to extend the existing contract for an additional three (3) years for a total of seven (7) years. Performance and pricing will be reviewed annually by both parties and any changes will require an updated amendment approved by the City Manager and J&S Striping Company. FISCAL IMPACT: Amendment No. 04 would renew the Professional Services Agreements for J&S Striping Company, Inc. (Co#15-060) for Street Striping and Pavement Marking Maintenance and approve expenditures in the amount of $150,000 per year over a three year period for a total of $450,000.00 to be funded from Account No. 11773035300 (Contract Services). Page 110 COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Enhancing Premier Community Status through the maintenance of high quality public improvements. ATTACHMENTS: Description Attachment 1 -Amendment No. 4 Page 111 AMENDMENT NO. 004 to Professional Services Agreement (CO #15-060) between J&S Striping Company, Inc. (hereinafter "Contractor") and City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter the "City") This Amendment No. 004 will serve to amend the Professional Services Agreement (hereinafter "Agreement"), CO# 15-060, to incorporate the following: Contractor and City would like to extend the existing contract for an additional three (3) years for a total of seven (7) years. Performance and pricing will be reviewed annually by both parties and any changes will require an updated amendment approved by the City Managers Office and J&S Striping Company. All other Terms and Conditions of the original Agreement CO#15-060, will remain in full effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties, through their respective authorized representatives, have executed this Amendment by way of signature by both parties and on the date indicated below. Please return two (2) original signed copies to the City no later than July 27, 2018. The City will process both copies for signature and provide Contractor with one (1) fully executed copy of the Amendment. J&S Striping Company, Inc. By: Name Title By: Name Date Date Title (two signatures required if corporation) City of Rancho Cucamonga By: Name Title By: Name Title Date Date ATTACHMENT 1 Page 112 DATE: August 1, 2018 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Ruth Cain, CPPB, Procurement Manager Cheryl Combs, Procurement Technician SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE USE OF THE NATIONAL IPA COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH OFFICE DEPOT FOR THE PROCUREMENT OF OFFICE SUPPLIES FROM OFFICE DEPOT AND AUTHORIZE THE USE OF FUTURE RENEWALS AS AWARDED BY NATIONAL IPA, TO BE FUNDED BY VARIOUS CITYWIDE ACCOUNT NUMBERS, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ADOPTED BUDGET. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council approve the use of the National IPA Cooperative Agreement with Office Depot, Contract 13-23R, awarded by the City of Tamarac, Florida, for the procurement of citywide office supplies and authorize the use of future renewals as awarded by National IPA, to be funded by various citywide account numbers, in accordance with the adopted budget. BACKGROUND: The Procurement Division has identified a viable cooperative procurement option with National IPA for office supplies from Office Depot. The City has previously utilized a cooperative agreement for office supplies through a TCPN Cooperative Agreement with Office Depot TCPN has now merged with National I PA, and a new agreement has been awarded to Office Depot by the City of Tamarac, Florida, through a solicitation that was competitively bid and awarded. The City currently has an electronic system in place that allows users to order a variety of office supplies including paper and printer toner cartridges through Office Depot. ANALYSIS: Staff recommends that City Council authorize the purchase of office supplies from Office Depot utilizing the National IPA Contract Number 13-23R awarded by Tamarac, Florida, for the respective supplies available on the contract. The contract term has an expiration date of October 17, 2019, with options to renew as awarded by National IPA. Staff also recommends authorizing expenditures in accordance with the adopted fiscal year budgets from various citywide accounts. Procurement will continue to review the contracts annually. FISCAL IMPACT: As of 05/31/18, the FY 17/18 the total purchases through Office Depot were $193,337, with $74,716 in Page 113 the green spend category. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Continuing to utilize the NI PA Cooperative Agreement to procure items such as Office Supplies is tied to the Mid and Long Range Planning Council goal. Use of the Agreement effectively manages cost by providing steeper discounts to the City due to the high product volume procured by Citywide Departments as well as other entities that also utilize the Agreement This allows for more accuate budget planning for departmetns for the term of the Agreement. Page 114 DATE: August 1, 2018 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director Noah Daniels, Finance Manager SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING AN ANNUAL LEVY FOR THE COSTS INCURRED IN THE COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 93-1 (MASI PLAZA) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018/19. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution approving the annual levy for the costs incurred in the collection of assessments within Assessment District No. 93-1 (Masi Plaza) (the "District") for Fiscal Year 2018/19. BACKGROUND: On August 4, 1997, the City issued $2,990,000 in bonds pursuant to the Improvement Bond Act of 1915, Division 10 of the California Streets and Highways Code. All the proceedings of the City to form the District, to levy the assessments and to acquire the improvements described and being financed with the proceeds of the bonds had been undertaken pursuant to the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913, Division 12 of the California Streets and Highways Code and Resolution of Intention No. 97-104 adopted by the City Council on February 19, 1997. The District, comprised of approximately 23.64 acres, is located along the south side of Foothill and the west side of Rochester and consists of 25 developed lots subject to assessment. Annually, prior to the County's direct assessment enrollment deadline in August, the City Council is requested to adopt a resolution approving the levy of assessments as reflected in the respective Annual Status Report for the District. Accordingly, for the upcoming Fiscal Year 2018/19 levy, the City Council's approval is recommended prior to the August 10, 2018 submittal deadline to the County of San Bernardino, for the assessments to be included in the upcoming tax roll. Although the City Council has previously authorized the formation of the District, the bonded indebtedness and the maximum assessment levy within the boundaries of the District, the actual annual assessment to be levied must be authorized on an annual basis until the bonds have been repaid in September 2022. ANALYSIS: The annual assessment for the District is sufficient to pay for the principal, interest and other periodic Page 115 costs for the bonded indebtedness associated with the District. All the costs related to the District are costs of the District, not the City nor its General Fund. Thus, all costs related to administering the District and paying debt service on the bonds are the responsibility of the property owners within the District. Additionally, the outstanding indebtedness of the District is not an obligation of the City. The annual assessment will be applied to all parcels within the District. The assessment shall be levied until the bonds issued by the District mature. Pursuant to Section 8682 of the Government Code, the City is authorized to collect an annual assessment fee of a maximum 5% of the amount of installments and not to exceed $16 per parcel assessment for costs incurred from the administration and assessment collections associated with the District. The table below summarizes the levy for the District for Fiscal Year 2018/19: Assessment District Proposed Assessment Levy Notes 93-1 (Masi Plaza)�:[ $ 248,626 No change from prior year. The assessments noted in the Annual Status Report for the District are net of estimated delinquencies for budgetary purposes. I n cases of delinquency and foreclosure, the parcels will be subject to penalties. If approved, City staff will file the certified list of all parcels subject to the assessment levy with the County of San Bernardino no later than the County's August 10, 2018 submittal deadline. Adoption of the resolution will provide for the Fiscal Year 2018/19 levy upon the parcels within the District that are not otherwise exempt from taxation for Fiscal Year 2018/19. FISCAL IMPACT: The District is separate from the City General Fund. The assessment revenues that are collected for the District are used for the related services, debt service payments and administration costs for only the District. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This item addresses the City Council's goal to continue supporting and enhancing the long term financial sustainability of the City's special districts. ATTACHMENTS: Description Attachment 1 - Resolution Attachment 2 - Annual Status Report Page 116 RESOLUTION NO. 18-061 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE -AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF AN ASSESSMENT SURCHARGE FOR THE EXPENSES INCURRED IN THE COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS IN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 93-1 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has heretofore undertaken proceedings pursuant to the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913" being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, and has confirmed assessments upon land within various special assessment districts (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "District"); and WHEREAS, said proceedings provided for and the City did subsequently issue bonds pursuant to the "Improvement Bond Act of 1915", being Division 10 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said bonds representing unpaid assessments within the District; and WHEREAS, the City does incur necessary administrative expenses in the collection of the annual installments of the assessment within the District; and WHEREAS, Government Code Section 8682 does authorize the City to establish an assessment surcharge to allow the City to recover its expenses of collection of said assessments; and WHEREAS, the City desires to establish such an assessment surcharge as authorized by said Government Code Section 8682. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: Treasurer is hereby directed to add to the annual installment of assessments within the District a maximum of five percent (5%) of the amount of the installments and of the interest thereon, not to exceed the Treasurer's estimate of the expenses of collection. Said expenses of collection shall include the necessary administrative expenses of the City incurred in providing the County Auditor with current information regarding the ownership or division of the affected lots or parcels of land within the District to ensure the proper entry by the County Auditor in his or her assessment roll and the timely collection of the Assessment installments. SECTION 1 The above assessment surcharge, when collected, shall belong to the City and shall cover the expenses and compensation of the Treasurer incurred in the collection of the assessments, and of the interest and penalties added on to the assessments. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 1St day of August 2018. Resolution No. 18-061 — Page 1 of 1 ATTACHMENT'Mge 117 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 93-1 MASI PLAZA ANNUAL STATUS REPORT AUGUST 2018 Page 118 Resolution 18-061 BACKGROUND On August 4, 1997, $2,990,000 in bonds were issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California (the "City") pursuant to the Improvement Bond Act of 1915, Division 10 of the California Streets and Highways Code (the "Bond Law"). All the proceedings of the City to form the Assessment District No. 93-1 Masi Plaza (the "Assessment District"), to levy the assessments and to acquire the improvements described and being financed with the proceeds of the bonds had been undertaken pursuant to the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913, Division 12 of the California Streets and Highways Code (the "Improvement Act"), and Resolution of Intention No. 97-104 adopted by the City Council of February 19, 1997. The Assessment District, comprising approximately 23.64 acres, is situated along the south side of Foothill and the west side of Rochester and consists of twenty-five (25) developed lots subject to assessment. Proceeds of the bonds were used to acquire certain streets, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, street lighting, traffic signal, water, sewer, storm drainage, public amenities and certain public utility improvements, constructed within the Assessment District and necessary for the existing and proposed development within the Assessment District. The method of assessment for the Assessment District was determined by the Assessment Engineer. The acquisition costs and proportionate share of the incidental costs for bid items were spread on a net assessable acreage basis to those areas of subareas of the Assessment District that specifically benefited from the works of improvements to be acquired. The Assessment Engineer determined that the special benefits received from the above cited works of improvements were in direct proportion to the number of assessable net acres of the record lots. The assessments were spread over all parcels within the boundary based upon its proportion of the total assessable acreage within the Assessment District. Net assessable acreage for all lots within the Assessment District was taken directly from the "per lot" net acreage shown on the recorded parcel without offset for easements. Section 8682 of the Government Code authorizes cities to collect an annual assessment fee of a maximum five percent (5%) of the amount of installments and not to exceed sixteen dollars per parcel assessment for the costs incurred in the administration and assessment collection. The requested fee will allow the City to recover funds for collection and management of the Assessment District that are applicable to the Improvement Bond Act of 1915. The City's comprehensive management program including record keeping, cost management, payoff calculations, monthly financial reports, debt service schedules, as well as providing information to the public is funded from this fee. This fee is in place Assessment District No. 93-1, Masi Plaza Page 1 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT #02 Page 119 Resolution 18-061 now to pay for administration and will allow the City to maintain the current rate and level of service. The assessment shall be levied only so long as required for each parcel of taxable property to discharge bond obligations. The following is a list of businesses located within the Assessment District: Building Phase Lot Apn Tenants 1 1 1 22901211 Valvoline Instant Oil Change 2 1 2 22901212 Shell Service Station and Seven Eleven 3 1 3 22901213 Jack in the Box 4 1 4 22901214 Taco Hut, Popeye's Chicken, Boba and Water, one Empty Suite, and Manila Sunset Grille 5A 1 5 22901215 GEN Korea Barbecue, Gards Music 5B 1 5 22901215 Abi Sabi Teppan Steak House & Sushi Bar 6 1 6 22901216 Denny's Restaurant 7 1 7 22901217 Creamistry, #1 Pho Noodle & Grill, Barbershop and two Empty Suites 8 1 8 22901218 Mountain View Tires 9 1 9 22901219 Quality Auto, Safel-ite Glass and one Empty Suite 10 1 10 22901220 Lim's Honda, Acura and Mazda and one Empty Suite 11 11 11 & 27 22901230 24 Hour Fitness 12A 11 12 22901221 Legends Nails, Nutrition 4 Less, My Makeup Kit, Sunshine Foot Massage and one Empty Suite 12B 11 12 22901221 Four Empty Suites 13 11 13 22901222 Vista Paint, Roger Dunn Golf Shop, and Proverbs 31, 909 Pub and Grill 14 11 14 22901223 Engrave'N Embrodier, Vapor Lounge, and two Empty Suites 15A 11 15 22901224 Premier Healthcare, Farmers Insurance and three Empty Suites 15B II 15 22901224 Five Empty Suites 16A 11 16 22901231 Toddler Town 16B 11 16 22901231 3 Suites for The Carey Agency,State Farm, CG Appraisal Agency, Rancho Wealth Management and one Empty Suite 16C 11 16 22901232 Parking Lot 18A 111 20 22901266 Six Empty Suites 18B 111 21 22901264 Pacific Century Investments, and Four Empty Suites 19A 111 18 & 19 22901267 Mountain View Oral Surgery, True Beauty Aesthetic and one Empty Suite 19B 111 17 & 18 22901268 Three Empty Suites, and two Suites for CW Driver Construction 20 111 22 22901269 Matrix Institute of Addiction Suites 102 A& B and one Empty Suite 24 111 24 22901261 Smog Stop, 2 Empty Suite, and Discount Auto 25 111 25 22901235 Eurotech Imports, Allstar Auto Center and Tint Shop 26 111 26 22901236 Empty Suite 27 11 11 & 27 22901230 24 Hour Fitness Assessment District No. 93-1, Masi Plaza Fiscal Year 2018/19 Page 2 ATTACHMENT #02 Page 120 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 93-1 PROPOSED SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS Sources Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies Interest Revenue Total Proposed Sources Uses Debt Service Principal Repayments Interest Expense Subtotal - Debt Service Contract Services Assessment Administration Admin./General Overhead Total Proposed Uses Resolution 18-061 Fiscal Year 2018/19 Budget $ 248,630 5,970 $ 254,600 $ 175,000 57,350 232,350 1,000 120 530 $ 234,000 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ 20,600 Assessment District No. 93-1, Masi Plaza Page 3 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT #02 Page 121 Resolution 18-061 !� Iv MLO N Irl E Q y o U Q . u' 0 ny hiJayC) �. CN N C J J O N 0 2 E LL Q 1 i ® —i AV }sea in Q 1 nd epuenn!}3' —.-_--_--_-- I� nd epuenng3 1 II II �g Nemo eQ ii nd aa}sayoo�{ - II ny Ja}sayooZ{ 1 II ny uamI!W r._.._.._.._.. II nd uaN!II!W j II 1 II 1 II nd uaneH 1 ii j Ilny uaneH 1 II ny esOWJaH ° ! ny esOWJaH 1 II nt/ Pleq!4ojd AV pleq!gojV ny U13WI10H 1 �•7•'N ny ueWIIGH j II AV pjeAaulA IS ue!lauaeo y_ �..� in �_ m in WaeHP€_°m 00 L J —_ tE - - - L.._ ..�_.._...�. N N t �O 2 o0 € 9 g a o a N cc mLL o CU ca Assessment District No. 93-1, Masi Plaza Page 4 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT #02 Page 122 DATE: August 1, 2018 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director Noah Daniels, Finance Manager SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL BENEFIT ASSESSMENTS FOR DRAINAGE AREA NO. 91-2 (DAY CANYON DRAINAGE BASIN) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018/19. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution approving the annual benefit assessment levy for the maintenance and servicing of a drainage channel within Drainage Area No. 91-2 (Day Canyon Drainage Basin) (the "District") for Fiscal Year 2018/19. BACKGROUND: On November 6, 1991, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 91-331 for the annual levy of benefit assessments for the maintenance and servicing of a 27 -acre-foot desilting basin and a 1,460 -linear foot concrete drainage channel within the District boundaries. The District was developer -initiated for the protection of the developed properties from the overland flows to receive development rights. The City maintains the desilting basin and drainage channel. The costs associated with the maintenance are passed on to the property owners because they receive special and direct benefit that is distinguishable from the other property owners that are outside the boundary. Annually, prior to the County's direct assessment enrollment deadline in August, the City Council is requested to adopt a resolution approving the levy of benefit assessments as reflected in the Annual Supplement to the Final Engineer's Report for the District pursuant to the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982. Accordingly, for the upcoming Fiscal Year 2018/19 levy, the City Council's approval is recommended prior to the August 10, 2018 submittal deadline to the County of San Bernardino for the assessments to be included in the upcoming tax roll. Although the City Council has previously authorized the formation of the District and the maximum assessment levy within the boundaries of the District, the actual annual assessment to be levied must be authorized on an annual basis. ANALYSIS: The annual assessment for the District is sufficient to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the desilting basin and drainage channel. All the costs related to the District are costs of the District, not the City nor its General Fund. Thus, all costs related to administering the District are the responsibility of the property owners within the District. The annual assessment will be applied to all parcels within the District. The total annual cost for maintenance to each parcel is $92.17. The table below summarizes the leve for the District for Fiscal Year 2018/19: Page 123 Benefit Assessment District Proposed Assessment Levy Notes 91-2 (Day Canyon Drainage Basin) $33,458 No change from prior year. The assessments noted in the Annual Supplement to the Final Engineer's Report for the District are net of estimated delinquencies for budgetary purposes. In cases of delinquency and foreclosure, the parcels will be subject to penalties. If approved, City staff will file the certified list of all parcels subject to the benefit assessment levy with the County of San Bernardino no later than the County's August 10, 2018 submittal deadline. Adoption of the resolution will provide for the Fiscal Year 2018/19 levy upon the parcels within the District that are not otherwise exempt from taxation for Fiscal Year 2018/19. FISCAL IMPACT: The District is separate from the City General Fund. The benefit assessment revenues that are collected for the District are used for the related services for only the District. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This item addresses the City Council's goal to continue supporting and enhancing the long term financial sustainability of the City's special districts. ATTACHMENTS: Description Attachment 1 - Resolution Attachment 2 -Annual Supplement to the Final Engineer's Report Page 124 RESOLUTION NO. 18-062 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING THE COST OF SERVICE TO BE FINANCED BY BENEFIT ASSESSMENTS TO BE LEVIED IN DRAINAGE AREA NO. 91-2 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018/19 AND DETERMINING AND IMPOSING SUCH BENEFIT ASSESSMENTS WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, previously undertook proceedings to authorize the levy and imposition of benefit assessments to pay for the annual drainage maintenance, including the removal of sediment and debris from the Day Canyon Channel improvements and basin, pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Benefit Assessment Act of 1982", being Chapter 6.4, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California (commencing with Section 54703), said area of benefit being known and designated as Drainage Area No. 91-2 (the "Drainage Area"); and WHEREAS, at this time there has been presented to this City Council an annual Supplemental Report (the "Supplemental Report") to the Final Engineer's Report for the Drainage Area setting forth a description of the proposed service, cost estimate and assessment schedule for Fiscal Year 2018/19; and WHEREAS, at this time this City Council desires to determine the cost of providing authorized services to be financed by the levy of a benefit assessment for Fiscal Year 2018/19 and to determine and impose such benefit assessment. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That the Supplemental Report is hereby approved and ordered to be kept on file in the Office of the City Clerk as a permanent record and to remain open for public inspection. Said Supplemental Report generally consists of the following: A. A description of the service proposed to be financed through revenue derived through the levy and collection of the benefit assessment; B. A description of each lot or parcel of property proposed to be subject to the benefit assessment; and C. The amount of the proposed assessment for each parcel. SECTION 3: That the rate and method of apportionment of the benefit assessment as set forth in the Final Engineer's Report is hereby adopted and has been utilized as the rate and method of apportionment of the benefit assessment to be levied in Fiscal Year 2018/19. SECTION 4: That this City Council hereby determines and orders that the benefit assessments described in the Supplemental Report within the Drainage Area are hereby confirmed and levied for Fiscal Year 2018/19. SECTION 5: That the above confirmed and levied benefit assessment for Fiscal Year 2018/19 shall be collected at the same time and in the same manner as general County property taxes are Resolution No. 18-062 — Page 1 of 2 ATTACHMENT #%ge 125 collected and all laws providing for the collection and enforcement of such County taxes shall be applicable to the collection and enforcement of these benefit assessments. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 1St day of August, 2018. Resolution No. 18-062 — Page 2 of 2 ATTACHMENT #01 Page 126 ANNUAL SUPPLEMENT TO THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT DRAINAGE AREA NO. 91-2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL L'Dennis Michael, Mayor Lynne B. Kennedy, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Sam Spagnolo, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director AUGUST 2018 Page 127 Resolution 18-062 ANNUAL SUPPLEMENT TO FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT DRAINAGE AREA NO. 91-2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TABLE OF CONTENTS Engineer's Report Exhibit A - Description of Service Exhibit B - Cost Estimate Exhibit C - Assessment Schedule Benefit Assessment District No. 91-2 1 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT #02 Page 128 Resolution 18-062 AGENCY: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PROJECT: DRAINAGE AREA NO. 91-2 TO: CITY COUNCIL CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA ANNUAL SUPPLEMENT TO FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT PURSUANT TO BENEFIT ASSESSMENT ACT OF 1982 This Annual Supplement to the Final Engineer's Report (the "Annual Supplement") for City of Rancho Cucamonga Drainage Area No. 91-2 is hereby submitted consisting of the following documents, pursuant to the provisions of the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982, being Chapter 6.4, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California, commencing with Section 54703. This Annual Supplement is applicable for the ensuing 12 -month period, being the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2018 to June 30, 2019. 1. DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE (Exhibit "A"): A description of the service proposed to be financed through revenue derived from the levy and collection of the annual benefit assessment. 2. COST ESTIMATE (Exhibit "B"): A listing of all costs and expenses for the next fiscal year, including incidental expenses. 3. BENEFIT ASSESSMENT SCHEDULE (Exhibit "C"): The annual assessment schedule, setting forth the following: A. Annual Benefit Assessment: The amount of the proposed benefit assessment for each parcel. B. Description of Parcel: A description of each lot or parcel of property proposed to be subject to the benefit assessment, said parcel being described by the County Assessor's parcel number. No benefit assessments shall be imposed or levied upon land owned by a Federal or State governmental agency and/or any other local agency. Any utility property and Benefit Assessment District No. 91-2 2 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT #02 Page 129 Resolution 18-062 right-of-way shall be subject to assessment only to the extent that it is specifically benefited from the proposed services. Reference is made to the Final Engineer's Report as incorporated in Resolution No. 91-331 for a description of the boundaries of the Drainage Area and each parcel therein and for the method of spreading the benefit assessment. Executed this 1St day of August, 2018, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING SERVICES/CITY ENGINEER CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA Final approval, confirmation and levy of the annual benefit assessment and all matters in the Annual Supplement were made on the 1St day of August, 2018, by adoption of Resolution No. 18-062 by the City Council. CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA A copy of said Assessment Roll and Annual Supplement was filed in the Office of the City Engineer and the City Clerk on the 1 st day of August, 2018. CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING SERVICES/CITY ENGINEER CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA Benefit Assessment District No. 91-2 Fiscal Year 2018/19 3 ATTACHMENT #02 Page 130 Resolution 18-062 EXHIBIT A DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE The properties within Drainage Area No. 91-2 ("Drainage Area") are located within the boundaries of the Day Canyon Drainage Basin area. Protection of the properties within the Drainage Area from overland flows requires the construction of a 27+ acre-foot desilting basin and a 1,460+ linear foot concrete drainage channel. The channel improvements will intercept the overland flows prior to reaching the properties and carry the storm water runoff, sediment, trash, organic material and related debris to a desilting basin. Each year the sediment, trash, organic material and other related debris that accumulates in the desilting basin and channel must be removed and transported to an approved spoils site. The services proposed to be financed from the revenue derived from the levy and collections of the annual benefit assessment are as follows: A. Monthly on-site inspections of the desilting basin and channel. B. Bi -monthly weed abatement program for the desilting basin and channel. C. Removal of accumulated sediment, trash, organic material and other related debris from the desilting basin and channel to an approved spoils site. This service is expected to be provided annually. During times of excessive rainfall, this service may be required more frequently. Benefit Assessment District No. 91-2 4 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT #02 Page 131 Resolution 18-062 EXHIBIT B COST ESTIMATE FISCAL YEAR 2018/19 A. Cost of Annual Maintenance Regular Salaries $13,870 Fringe Benefits 6,370 Subtotal 20,240 B. Incidental Expenses City Administration 1,700 Administration/General Overhead 3,490 Subtotal 5,190 C. Total Annual Costs 25,430 D. Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance 8,350 E. Balance to Assessment Property Taxes, net of estimated delinquencies 32,580 Interest Earnings 550 Delinquencies 650 $33,780 Benefit Assessment District No. 91-2 5 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT #02 Page 132 Resolution 18-062 EXHIBIT C ASSESSMENT SCHEDULE WHEREAS, this City Council has previously, pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Benefit Assessment Act of 1982", being Chapter 6.4, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California, commencing with Section 54703, formed Drainage Area No. 91-2 all in accordance with the provisions of said Act; and, WHEREAS, the Annual Supplement for Fiscal Year 2018/19 consisting of certain documentation (including the amount of the proposed assessment for each parcel, a description of the parcel and a description of the service proposed to be provided) has now been prepared. NOW, THEREFORE, the Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer by virtue of the power vested pursuant to said Act and by order of the legislative body, hereby makes and recommends the following benefit assessment to cover the costs and expenses of the service proposed to be financed through the levy of assessments and revenue derived for the Fiscal Year 2018/19. Said costs and expenses are generally as follows: Personnel Salaries $20,240 Cost of Improvements 0 Incidental Expenses 5,190 Total Costs 25,430 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance 8,350 Balance to Assesment $33,780 I do hereby assess and apportion the total amount of the costs and expenses upon the several parcels of land within the area of benefit in proportion to the estimated benefits received and hereby further state as follows: A. The amount of benefit assessment imposed is specifically related to the benefit of the parcel, which will be derived from the provision of the service to be provided. B. The annual aggregate amount of the total benefit assessment does not exceed the estimated annual cost of providing the service. Benefit Assessment District No. 91-2 6 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT #02 Page 133 Resolution 18-062 C. The revenue derived from the benefit assessment shall not be used to pay for the cost of any service other than the service for which the benefit assessment was levied. The assessment parcels herein refer to the County Assessment Roll for a description of the lots or parcels and said assessment roll shall govern for all details concerning the description of the lots or parcels. The net amount to be assessed upon the lands has been spread and apportioned by formula as set forth in the Final Engineer's Report in accordance with the benefits received from each parcel and in my opinion, said costs and expenses have been apportioned in direct relationship to the benefits received from the maintenance works of improvement. In the opinion of the undersigned, the benefit assessments have been spread and apportioned in accordance with the benefits to be received from the proposed work and services. Dated: August 1, 2018 DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING SERVICES/CITY ENGINEER CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA ASSESSMENT PARCEL PROPERTY NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1087-261-01 to 11 1087-271-01 to 42 1087-281-01 to 58 1087-291-01 to 20 1087-301-01 to 35 1087-311-01 to 38 1087-321-01 to 34 1087-331-01 to 61 1087-341-01 to 58 Total Benefit Assessment District No. 91-2 Fiscal Year 2018/19 363 Residential Parcels AMOUNT OF ASSESSMENT $33,780.00 $33,780.00 7 ATTACHMENT #02 Page 134 r� 1 AV WD�!INN Ay usnSH nV usWwJ0H AV Pleq!H�J7 Ay ueuJIIaH Resolution 18-062 r Y 5 LpC LO � ev c _ p 07 -- rn AV }523 us AV AV 2pU eIJ41 }3 9 3�22JQ 7 AV JaysaHnod I j IAV uaNII!4Y 31,; LiepuJeO I I - Benefit Assessment District No. 91-2 Fiscal Year 2018/19 8 ATTACHMENT #02 Page 135 AV uaA2H Ay UIsowJaH AV Pll�q!+-PJ V +•" ny uEwIPH �n ny pi ehau I/\ o 8 ATTACHMENT #02 Page 135 DATE: August 1, 2018 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director Noah Daniels, Finance Manager SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NOS. 2000-01, 2000-02,2000-03,2000- 03 000-02,2000-03,2000- 03 SPECIAL TAX "B", 2001-01 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NOS. 1 AND 2),2001- 01 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 3), 2003-01 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 1), 2003-01 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 2), 2004-01, 2006-01 AND 2006-02 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018/19. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt resolutions approving the levy of special taxes for Community Facilities District Nos. 2000-01 (South Etiwanda), 2000-02 (Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park), 2000-03 (Rancho Summit), 2000-03 Special Tax "B" (Rancho Summit), 2001-01 (Improvement Area Nos. 1 and 2), 2001-01 (Improvement Area No. 3), 2003-01 (Improvement Area No. 1), 2003-01 (Improvement Area No. 2), 2004-01 (Rancho Etiwanda Estates), 2006-01 (Vintner's Grove) and 2006-02 (Amador on Route 66) for Fiscal Year 2018/19. BACKGROUND: Pursuant to the Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (the "1982 Act"), the City Council approved the issuance of bonds to finance public facilities within certain geographical boundaries which formed the aforementioned Community Facilities Districts (each a "District" and collectively, the "Districts"). Annually, prior to the County's direct assessment enrollment deadline in August, the City Council is asked to adopt a resolution approving the levy of special tax as reflected in the respective Annual Status Report for each district. Accordingly, for the upcoming Fiscal Year 2018/19 levy, the City Council's approval is recommended prior to the August 10, 2018 submittal deadline to the County of San Bernardino, for the special taxes to be included in the upcoming tax roll. Although the City Council has previously authorized the formation of the Districts, the bonded indebtedness and the maximum levy of a special tax within the boundaries of the Districts, the actual annual special tax to be levied must be authorized on an annual basis until the bonds have been repaid. The bonds are scheduled to be repaid in various fiscal years between 2025/26 to 2036/37. ANALYSIS: The annual levy of special taxes for the Districts is sufficient to pay for the public facilities and services as well as the principal, interest and other periodic costs for the bonded indebtedness associated with the Districts. These costs are permitted to be financed pursuant to the 1982 Act. All the costs related to the Districts are costs of the Districts, not the City nor its General Fund. Thus, all costs related to Page 136 administering the Districts and paying debt service on the bonds are the responsibility of the property owners within the Districts. Additionally, the outstanding indebtedness of the Districts is not an obligation of the City. The annual levy of special taxes will be applied to all parcels within the Districts which are not otherwise exempt from taxation or that have not provided a complete payoff covering all future fiscal years' levies. The special taxes will be levied until the bonds issued by the Districts mature, except for the maintenance special tax for CFD 2000-03 Special Tax "B" (Rancho Summit). The maintenance special tax will be levied and collected in perpetuity, unless and until such time the City determines that revenues are no longer needed. The table below summarizes the levy for each District for Fiscal Year 2018/19: Community Facilities Proposed Special Tax Notes District Levy 2000-01 (South Etiwanda) $ 73,922 No change from prior year. 2000-02 (Rancho Cucamonga $ 517,768 No change from prior year. Corporate Park) 2000-03 (Rancho Summit) $ 566,112 No change from prior year. 2000-03 Special Tax "B" $ 471,305 Increase for CPI factor. (Rancho Summit) 2001-01 (Improvement Area No. 1 and $ 670,447 No change from prior year. 2) 2001-01 (Improvement Area No. 3) $ 61,467 No change from prior year. 2003-01 $ 1,132,029 Increase from prior year for (Improvement Area No. 1) debt service. 2003-01 (Improvement Area No. 2) $ 201,043 No change from prior year. 2004-01 (Rancho Etiwanda Estates) $ 2,658,770 No change from prior year. 2006-01 (Vintner's Grove) $ 288,959 No change from prior year. 2006-02 (Amador on Route 66) $ 183,158 No change from prior year. The special taxes noted in the Annual Status Report for each district are net of estimated delinquencies for budgetary purposes. I n cases of special tax delinquency and foreclosure, the parcels will be subject to penalties. If approved, City staff will file the certified list of all parcels subject to the special tax levy with the County of San Bernardino no later than the County's August 10, 2018 submittal deadline. Adoption of the resolutions will provide for the Fiscal Year 2018/19 levy upon the parcels within each District that are not otherwise exempt from taxation at the rates set forth in the attached Annual Status Reports for Fiscal Year 2018/19. FISCAL IMPACT: The Districts are separate from the City General Fund. The special tax revenues that are collected for each district are used for the related services, debt service payments and administration costs for only that District. Page 137 COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This item addresses the City Council's goal to continue supporting and enhancing the long term financial sustainability of the City's special districts. ATTACHMENTS: Description Attachment 1 - Resolution (CFD 2000-01) Attachment 2 -Annual Status Report (CFD 2000-01) Attachment 3 - Resolution (CFD 2000-02) Attachment4 -Annual Status Report (CFD 2000-02) Attachment 5 - Resolution (CFD 2000-03) Attachment 6 -Annual Status Report (CFD 2000-03) Attachment 7 - Resolution (CFD 2000-03 Special Tax B) Attachment 8 -Annual Status Report (CFD 2000-03 Special Tax B) Attachment 9 - Resolution (CFD 2001-01 Improvement Area No. 1 and 2) Attachment 10 -Annual Status Report (CFD 2001-01 Improvement Area No. 1 and 2) Attachment 11 - Resolution (C F D 2001-01 1 mprovement Area No. 3) Attachment 12 -Annual Status Report (CFD 2001-01 Improvement Area No. 3) Attachment 13 - Resolution (CFD 2003-01 Improvement Area No. 1) Attachment 14 -Annual Status Report (CFD 2003-01 Improvement Area No. 1) Attachment 15 - Resolution (CFD 2003-01 Improvement Area No. 2) Attachment 16 - Annual Status Report (CFD 2003-01 1 mprovement Area No. 2) Attachment 17 - Resolution (CFD 2004-01) Attachment 18 -Annual Status Report (CFD 2004-01) Attachment 19 - Resolution (CFD 2006-01) Attachment 20 -Annual Status Report (CFD 2006-01) Attachment 21 - Resolution (CFD 2006-02) Attachment 22 -Annual Status Report (CFD 2006-02) Page 138 RESOLUTION NO. 18-063 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2000-01 (SOUTH ETIWANDA) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018/19 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, (hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body of the local Agency"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code for the State of California. This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as Community Facilities District No. 2000-01 (South Etiwanda) (hereinafter referred to as the "District"); and WHEREAS, at this time, bonds were previously issued for purposes of financing the project facilities for said District (the "Prior Special Tax Bonds"); and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said District, and this legislative body, by the adoption of Resolution No. 15-147 on August 5, 2015, previously established the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the fiscal year based, in part, upon the debt service payable on the Prior Special Tax Bonds; and WHEREAS, on July 30, 2015, special tax refunding bonds were issued by the District to refund the Prior Special Tax Bonds resulting in a reduction in the debt service payable from the special taxes levied within the District. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the special tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for Fiscal Year 2018/19 for the District are hereby determined and established as set forth in the attached, referenced and incorporated in the Annual Status Report. SECTION 3: That the rates as set forth in such Annual Status Report do not exceed the amount as previously authorized by Ordinance of this legislative body, and are not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the special tax are used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: A. Payment of principal of and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness; B. Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds; C. Payment of costs and expenses of administering the District and any bonds of the District; and D. Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate. Resolution No. 18-063 — Page 1 of 2 ATTACHMENT #Kge 139 The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. SECTION 5: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax. SECTION 6: All monies above collected shall be paid into the District funds, including but not limited to, any special tax fund, bond fund, and reserve fund. SECTION 7: The County Auditor is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land effected in a space marked "public improvements, special tax", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special tax, and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Annual Status Report. SECTION 8: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties, and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 1St day of August 2018. Resolution No. 18-063 — Page 2 of 2 ATTACHMENT #Kge 140 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-01 SOUTH ETIWANDA ANNUAL STATUS REPORT AUGUST 2018 Page 141 Resolution No. 18-063 BACKGROUND On November 7, 2000, an election was held and the property owners within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 2000-01 (South Etiwanda) (the "District") authorized the District to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $1,365,000. On November 15, 2000, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 645 authorizing the levy of a Special Tax in the District. Bonds were issued on December 21, 2000, for the purpose of financing the acquisition of certain public facilities that included street, sewer, water, storm drain, landscaping and park improvements that were required for and would permit the development of the properties within the District. The District is located east of Interstate 15 and is bordered by Foothill to the south, East to the east, Base Line to the north, Etiwanda to the west and is intersected by Miller. On December 7, 2011, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 11-179 authorizing the issuance of special tax refunding bonds for this District. The Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Series 2012, in the principal amount of $658,000 were issued on December 21, 2011. This amount represented the outstanding principal balance of the original bonds as of this date. On July 1, 2015, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 15-115 authorizing the issuance of special tax refunding bonds for this District in conjunction with various other community facilities districts. The Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Series 2015, were refunded with a total principal amount of $18,546,000 and were issued on July 30, 2015. By authorizing this refunding, the City Council provided savings to the property owners for the remaining life of the bond issue, that translated to a 4.85% overall reduction in the annual debt service payment paid by property owners. The annual special tax is based on the square footage of the home for residential properties. This special tax shall be levied only so long as required for each parcel of taxable property to discharge bond obligations. Community Facilities District No. 2000-01 1 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT #02 Page 142 Resolution No. 18-063 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-01 ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FISCAL YEAR 2018/19 DESCRIPTION BUILDING SIZE ASSIGNED SPECIAL TAX 1. Residential Property > 2,301 Sq Ft $283.66 2. Residential Property 1,801 — 2,300 Sq Ft $269.48 3. Residential Property <1,800 Sq Ft $241.11 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-01 PROPOSED SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS Fiscal Year 2018/19 Budget Sources Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies $ 73,540 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 1,350 Subtotal - Taxes 74,890 Interest Revenue 690 Total Proposed Sources $ 75,580 Uses Debt Service Principal Repayments Interest Expense Subtotal - Debt Service Contract Services Assessment Administration Adm in./General Overhead Total Proposed Uses Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance Community Facilities District No. 2000-01 Fiscal Year 2018/19 $ 44,000 10,740 54,740 1,000 16,250 80 $ 72,070 $ 3,510 2 ATTACHMENT #02 Page 143 II I Ay upuem.4} 1' yOaJ3 XUCI AV Jajse qoo)� � I 9 AV UDNEH 1 I AV EsouJJaN AV R!eq!4uJV ny uUMPH I — Resolution No. 18-063 Ali` 4SL13 U3 L ;3 AV epu 1 AIV W -AV uaAeK AVESOWJOH aIV ;.rny UewIIOH Ay pa eAilu!A is uplauJ-eo m I�i��i •� o 0 J fV a ' U- C - - AV 4JJ.-14 J � - F yyY d'Z J � 4J {y 0} p J 07 Y p Ali` 4SL13 U3 L ;3 AV epu 1 AIV W -AV uaAeK AVESOWJOH aIV ;.rny UewIIOH Ay pa eAilu!A is uplauJ-eo I�i��i E ai a C - - F yyY d'Z Community Facilities District No. 2000-01 3 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT #02 Page 144 RESOLUTION NO. 18-064 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2000-02 (RANCHO CUCAMONGA CORPORATE PARK) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018/19 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, (hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body of the local Agency"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code for the State of California. This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as Community Facilities District No. 2000-02 (Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park) (hereinafter referred to as the "District"); and WHEREAS, at this time, bonds were previously issued for purposes of financing the project facilities for said District (the "Prior Special Tax Bonds"); and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said District, and this legislative body, by the adoption of Resolution No. 15-148 on August 5, 2015, previously established the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the fiscal year based, in part, upon the debt service payable on the Prior Special Tax Bonds; and WHEREAS, on July 30, 2015, special tax refunding bonds were issued by the District to refund the Prior Special Tax Bonds resulting in a reduction in the debt service payable from the special taxes levied within the District. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the special tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for Fiscal Year 2018/19 for the District are hereby determined and established as set forth in the attached, referenced and incorporated in the Annual Status Report. SECTION 3: That the rates as set forth in such Annual Status Report do not exceed the amount as previously authorized by Ordinance of this legislative body, and are not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the special tax are used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: A. Payment of principal of and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness; B. Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds; C. Payment of costs and expenses of administering the District and any bonds of the District; and D. Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate. Resolution No. 18-064 — Page 1 of 2 ATTACHMENT #Rge 145 The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. SECTION 5: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax. SECTION 6: All monies above collected shall be paid into the District funds, including but not limited to, any special tax fund, bond fund, and reserve fund. SECTION 7: The County Auditor is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land effected in a space marked "public improvements, special tax", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special tax, and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Annual Status Report. SECTION 8: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties, and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 1st day of August 2018. Resolution No. 18-064 — Page 2 of 2 ATTACHMENT #Rge 146 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-02 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CORPORATE PARK ANNUAL STATUS REPORT AUGUST 2018 Page 147 Resolution No. 18-064 BACKGROUND On November 7, 2000, the electors within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 2000-02 (Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park) (the "District") authorized the District to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $6,835,000 for the purpose of financing the acquisition of street improvements on public street improvements required as a condition of approval of development of the property within the proposed district including Milliken, Arrow and Foothill; such street improvements to include, but not to be limited to: demolition and grading, curb, gutter and sidewalks, traffic signals; entry feature and signs; fire hydrants; storm drains; water and sewer improvements; paving; striping; landscaping and irrigation improvements; public utilities and appurtenances. On December 7, 2011, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 11-179 authorizing the issuance of special tax refunding bonds for this District. The Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Series 2011, in the principal amount of $5,407,000 were issued on December 21, 2011. This amount represented the outstanding principal balance of the original bonds as of this date. On July 1, 2015, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 15-115 authorizing the issuance of special tax refunding bonds for this District in conjunction with various other Community Facilities Districts. The Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Series 2015 were refunded with a total principal amount of $18,546,000 and were issued on July 30, 2015. By authorizing this refunding, the City Council provided savings to the property owners for the remaining life of the bond issue, that translated to a 4.72% overall reduction in the annual debt service payment paid by property owners. Each July 1, commencing July 1, 2012 the maximum annual special tax will be increased by two percent (2%) of the amount in effect for the previous fiscal year. The special taxes will be levied as follows: (1) The special tax will be levied on each taxable parcel in an amount equal to 100% of the applicable maximum annual special tax; or (2) If the special tax requirement will be satisfied by an amount less than the maximum annual special tax the special tax will be levied proportionately on each taxable parcel at less than 100% of the maximum annual special tax. Therefore, for Fiscal Year 2018/19 the current rate is sufficient to meet fiscal obligations and there is no need for an increase of the special tax by 2%. This special tax shall be levied only so long as required for each parcel of taxable property to discharge bond obligations. Community Facilities District No. 2000-02 1 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT #04 Page 148 Resolution No. 18-064 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-02 ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FISCAL YEAR 2018/19 There will be no increase to the special tax for the District. The annual tax rate for Fiscal Year 2018/19 will be $3,792.06 per acre and will provide sufficient funding for the estimated uses and contribution to fund balance in the amount of $539,880. COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-02 PROPOSED SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS Fiscal Year 2018/19 Budget Sources Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies $ 517,190 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 19,000 Subtotal - Taxes 536,190 Interest Revenue 3,690 Total Proposed Sources $ 539,880 Uses Debt Service Principal Repayments $ 369,000 Interest Expense 101,310 Subtotal - Debt Service 470,310 Contract Services 1,000 Assessment Administration 46,800 Adm in./General Overhead 190 Total Proposed Uses $ 518,300 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ 21,580 Community Facilities District No. 2000-02 2 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT #04 Page 149 Resolution No. 18-064 to «} M CIA �y CD V CS r J AV AJJUgC ti LO 1 r c • I — -__� !AV ISIED cn CU LL ny epuen+tl}_9 nv epu2noi#-� g Aaaa3 Wd ny Ja}sa4 J - r%yaa}saqz)Oa )I II.PJ iAV UGAEH +old MUUM'l � — I� ny esaLwaN AV Pleq!LPJV AV ploqNniv ' � I V ueuJII MIAV uewllaH I I Ayp904 !A "• a-' ° fill Community Facilities District No. 2000-02 3 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT #04 Page 150 RESOLUTION NO. 18-065 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING FOR THE LEVY OF SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-03 (RANCHO SUMMIT) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018/19 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, (hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body of the local Agency"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code for the State of California. This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as Community Facilities District No. 2000-03 (Rancho Summit) (hereinafter referred to as the "District"); and WHEREAS, at this time, bonds have been authorized for purposes of financing the project facilities for said District; and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said District, and this legislative body is desirous to establish the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the fiscal year. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the special tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for Fiscal Year 2018/19 for the referenced District are hereby determined and established as set forth in the attached, referenced and incorporated in the Annual Status Report. SECTION 3: That the rate as set forth above does not exceed the amount as previously authorized by Ordinance of this legislative body, and is not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the special tax are used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: A. Payment of principal of and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness; B. Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds; C. Payment of costs and expenses of authorized public facilities and public services; and D. Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate. The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. SECTION 5: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax. Resolution No. 18-065 — Page 1 of 2 ATTACHMENT #Kge 151 SECTION 6: All monies above collected shall be paid into the District funds, including but not limited to, any special tax fund, bond fund, and reserve fund. SECTION 7: The County Auditor is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land effected in a space marked "public improvements, special tax", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special tax, and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Annual Status Report. SECTION 8: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties, and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 1St day of August 2018. Resolution No. 18-065 — Page 2 of 2 ATTACHMENT #Kge 152 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-03 A (RANCHO SUMMIT) ANNUAL STATUS REPORT AUGUST 2018 Page 153 Resolution No. 18-065 BACKGROUND On October 11, 2000 an election was held and the property owners within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 2000-03 (Rancho Summit) (the "District") authorized the District to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $9,835,000. On July 6, 2005, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 744 approving the levy of the special tax and on September 21, 2005 approved Resolution No. 05-278 authorizing the issuance of bonds. The District was authorized to finance park improvements including clearing and grading of park sites, park hardscape and restrooms, street improvements and parkway hardscape landscaping of parks and parkways and park equipment with a useful life of five (5) years or more. The District is bounded by the San Bernardino National Forest to the north, the 210 Freeway to the south, Interstate 15 Freeway to the east and East to the west. On July 16, 2014, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 14-127 authorizing the issuance of special tax refunding bonds for this District. The Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Series 2014 in the principal amount of $8,500,000 were issued on July 31, 2014. By authorizing this refunding, the City Council provided annual savings to the property owners of approximately $120,000 for the remaining life of the bond issue. Each Fiscal Year, all Taxable Property within the District shall be assigned to a Zone and further classified as Developed Property, Taxable Public Property, Taxable Property Owner Association Property, or Undeveloped Property and shall be subject to Special Taxes in accordance with this Amended and Restated Rate and Method of Apportionment. Residential Property shall be assigned to Land Use Classes 1 through 10 and Non -Residential Property shall be assigned to Land Use Class 11. Community Facilities District No. 2000-03 (Rancho Summit) 1 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT #06 Page 154 Land Use Class 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Resolution No. 18-065 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-03 ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FISCAL YEAR 2018/19 Description Residential Property Residential Property Residential Property Residential Property Residential Property Residential Property Residential Property Residential Property Residential Property Residential Property Non -Residential Property Residential Floor Area Assigned Special Tax < 1,850 Sq. Ft 1,850 — 2,049 Sq. Ft 2,050 — 2,249 Sq. Ft 2,250 — 2,449 Sq. Ft 2,450 — 2,649 Sq. Ft 2,650 — 2,849 Sq. Ft 2,850 — 3,049 Sq. Ft 3,050 — 3,049 Sq. Ft 3,250 — 3,249 Sq. Ft _> 3,450 Sq. Ft N/A $1,286.21 $1,430.88 $1,527.32 $1,541.65 $1,552.94 $1,684.05 $1,855.09 $1,904.07 $2,017.09 $2,031.41 $9,493.97 per Acre Community Facilities District No. 2000-03 (Rancho Summit) 2 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT #06 Page 155 Resolution No. 18-065 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-03 PROPOSED USES AND SOURCES OF FUNDS Fiscal Year 2018/19 Budget Sources Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies $ 560,590 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 8,250 Subtotal - Taxes 568,840 Interest Revenue 2,410 Total Proposed Sources $ 571,250 Uses Debt Service Principal Repayments Interest Expense Subtotal - Debt Service Contract Services Assessment Administration Adm in./General Overhead Total Proposed Uses $ 268,000 250,460 518,460 2,000 29,950 170 $ 550,580 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ 20,670 Community Facilities District No. 2000-03 (Rancho Summit) 3 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT #06 Page 156 �a&J AU(I AV J0 �l AVUUAVH I I AV 2S011l1-3-1 ' l Ay pleq!gojv I � Av ueua119H I lS Lie!I-3u.ie') Resolution No. 18-065 I II A4j+J2158u79}� 5 4 ny Pieq! HZIJv 4 IV pJeha-! ] a2 m 2 Cts � � R� 3 ti % " ¢ ti r��$, r'gi1M LL' Jill $ Community Facilities District No. 2000-03 (Rancho Summit) 4 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT #06 Page 157 u� O O O J CV U- AV &UU143 0 J � L, j m m I I ,v epu'�M'111 I II A4j+J2158u79}� 5 4 ny Pieq! HZIJv 4 IV pJeha-! ] a2 m 2 Cts � � R� 3 ti % " ¢ ti r��$, r'gi1M LL' Jill $ Community Facilities District No. 2000-03 (Rancho Summit) 4 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT #06 Page 157 RESOLUTION NO. 18-066 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING FOR THE LEVY OF MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX "B" FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-03 (RANCHO SUMMIT) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018/19 TO FINANCE THE OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF PARKS AND PARKWAYS WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, (hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body of the local Agency"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code for the State of California. This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as Community Facilities District No. 2000-03 (Rancho Summit) (hereinafter referred to as the "District"); and WHEREAS, at this time, bonds have been authorized for purposes of financing the project facilities for said District; and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said District, and this legislative body is desirous to establish the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the fiscal year. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the Special Tax "B" to be collected for Fiscal Year 2018/19 for the District are hereby determined and established as set forth Annual Status Report to this Resolution, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. SECTION 3: That the rate as set forth above does not exceed the amount as previously authorized by the Ordinance, and is not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. SECTION 4: That the proceeds of Special Tax "B" shall be used, in whole or in part, for the following: A. Payment of costs and expenses of the operation and maintenance of authorized parks and parkways and incidental expenses pursuant to the Act; B. Payment of an amount necessary to fund or replenish an operating reserve for the costs of the operation of authorized parks and parkways; and C. Payment of a proportionate share of Administrative Expenses as such tern is defined in the Modified Rate and Method. The proceeds of Special Tax "B" shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. SECTION 5: Special Tax "B" shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable Resolution No. 18-066 — Page 1 of 2 ATTACHMENT #9ge 158 administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax. SECTION 6: All monies above collected shall be paid into the District funds, including but not limited to, any special tax fund, bond fund, and reserve fund. SECTION 7: The County Auditor is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land effected in a space marked "public improvements, special tax", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of Special Tax "B," and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Annual Status Report. SECTION 8: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties, and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 1St day of August 2018. Resolution No. 18-066 — Page 2 of 2 ATTACHMENT #Kge 159 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-03 B (RANCHO SUMMIT) ANNUAL STATUS REPORT AUGUST 2018 Page 160 Resolution No. 18-066 BACKGROUND On August 16, 2000, the City Council approved Resolution No. 00-149 and established Community Facilities District No. 2000-03, (the "District"). On October 11, 2000, the qualified electors of the District, being the owners of the land within the District, voted to approve the levy of a special tax to pay for certain public services and the administering of such District. On July 6, 2005, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 744 approving the levy of the special tax and on September 21, 2005 approved Resolution No. 05-278 authorizing the issuance of bonds. The District was authorized to finance park improvements, including, clearing and grading of park sites, park hardscape and restrooms, street improvements and parkway hardscape landscaping of parks and parkways and park equipment with a useful life of five (5) years or more. The District is bounded by the San Bernardino National Forest to the north, the 210 Freeway to the south, Interstate 15 Freeway to the east and East to the west. Each fiscal year, all Taxable Property within the District shall be assigned to a Zone and further classified as Developed Property, Taxable Public Property, Taxable Property Owner Association Property, or Undeveloped Property and shall be subject to Special Taxes in accordance with this Amended and Restated Rate and Method of Apportionment. Residential Property shall be assigned to Land Use Classes 1 through 10 and Non -Residential Property shall be assigned to Land Use Class 11. Annually on July 1, the Maximum Special Tax "B" shall be increased based on the percentage change in the Consumer Price Index, with a maximum annual increase of six percent (6%) and a minimum annual increase of two percent (2%) per Fiscal Year. At this time, in order to provide sufficient revenues to meet the District expenses without adversely impacting maintenance, a rate increase to the Maximum Special Tax "B" is required. This equates to a 3.5% increase from the prior year. Fiscal Year CPI Rate Maximum Assessment per EBU Actual Assessment per EBU 2016/17 6.00% $1,240.11 $1,240.11 2017/18 2.00% $1,264.91 $1,264.91 2018/19 1 3.50% 1 $1,309.18 $1,309.18 Community Facilities District No. 2000-03 1 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT #08 Page 161 Resolution No. 18-066 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-03 ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FISCAL YEAR 2018/19 Land Use Class Description Residential Floor Area Maximum Special Tax B 1 -10 Residential Property <1850 Sq. Ft to => 3,450 Sq. Ft $ 1,309.18 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-03 PROPOSED SOURCESAND USES OF FUNDS Fiscal Year 2018/19 Budget Sources Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies $ 466,600 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 4,850 Subtotal - Taxes 471,450 Interest Revenue 5,710 Total Proposed Sources $ 477,160 Uses Personnel Services 209,350 Operations and Maintenance 26,000 Contract Services 55,930 Utilities 110,880 Assessment Administration 1,690 Admin./General Overhead 59,940 Transfers Out to LMD#7 North Etiwanda 30,000 Total Proposed Uses $ 523,790 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ (46,630) Community Facilities District No. 2000-03 2 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT #08 Page 162 Ay UaAUH P.V esouLi0H AV pleq!WDjy AV UPWIlaH IS uellouiez) -------------- Ay J91SO gOOb W Community Facilities District No. 2000-03 Fiscal Year 2018/19 Resolution No. 18-066 u, 0 IC -51 v 1,JAaW3 m � p O LL t AV is I? 3 U� AV apueN.i#-:1 f � n�aalsaW�oa ' AV u=l�! l l l yy ,AV uaAeH M Air eSOILIJ31-1 AV Pleq!4zlj 4f ' Ay U2LU112H r LF tO AV PJ 3 ATTACHMENT #08 Page 163 RESOLUTION NO. 18-067 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2001-01 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NOS. 1 AND 2) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018/19 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, (hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body of the local Agency"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code for the State of California. This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as Community Facilities District No. 2001-01 (Improvement Area Nos. 1 and Improvement Area No. 2) (hereinafter referred to as the "District"); and WHEREAS, at this time, bonds were previously issued for purposes of financing the project facilities for said District (the "Prior Special Tax Bonds"); and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said District, and this legislative body, by the adoption of Resolution No. 15-149 on August 5, 2015, previously established the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the fiscal year based, in part, upon the debt service payable on the Prior Special Tax Bonds; and WHEREAS, on July 30, 2015, special tax refunding bonds were issued by the District to refund the Prior Special Tax Bonds resulting in a reduction in the debt service payable from the special taxes levied within the District. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the special tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for Fiscal Year 2018/19 for the District are hereby determined and established as set forth in the attached, referenced and incorporated in the Annual Status Report. SECTION 3: That the rates as set forth in such Annual Status Report do not exceed the amount as previously authorized by Ordinance of this legislative body, and are not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the special tax are used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: A. Payment of principal of and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness; B. Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds; C. Payment of costs and expenses of administering the District and any bonds of the District; and D. Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate. Resolution No. 18-067 — Page 1 of 2 ATTACHMENT #Rge 164 The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. SECTION 5: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax. SECTION 6: All monies above collected shall be paid into the District funds, including but not limited to, any special tax fund, bond fund, and reserve fund. SECTION 7: The County Auditor is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land effected in a space marked "public improvements, special tax", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special tax, and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Annual Status Report. SECTION 8: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties, and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 1St day of August 2018. Resolution No. 18-067 — Page 2 of 2 ATTACHMENT #Rge 165 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2001-01 IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 1 AND 2 ANNUAL STATUS REPORT AUGUST 2018 Page 166 Resolution No. 18-067 BACKGROUND On June 20, 2001, an election was held and the property owners within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 2001-01 (Improvement Area Nos. 1 and 2) (the "District") authorized the District to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $14,240,000. On August 15, 2001, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 01-019 authorizing the issuance of bonds. Bonds were issued on August 29, 2001, to share in the financing of public street improvements required for the development of the property within the District; including, improvements to Day Creek, Victoria Park, Church, Foothill, Base Line and Arbor; landscaping improvements within public right-of-way; and storm drain and flood control improvements. On December 7, 2011, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 11-179 authorizing the issuance of special tax refunding bonds for this District. The Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Series 2012, in the principal amount of $9,093,000 were issued on December 21, 2011. This amount represented the outstanding principal balance of the original bonds as of this date. On July 1, 2015, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 15-115 authorizing the issuance of special tax refunding bonds for this District in conjunction with various other Community Facilities Districts. The Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Series 2015, were refunded with a total principal amount of $18,546,000 and were issued on July 30, 2015. By authorizing this refunding, the City Council provided savings to the property owners for the remaining life of the bond issue, that translated to a 12.09% overall reduction in the annual debt service payment paid by property owners. The special tax shall be levied only so long as required for each parcel of taxable property to discharge bond obligations. Each fiscal year, all Taxable Property within Improvement Area No. 1 and Improvement Area No. 2 shall be classified as Developed Property, Final Mapped Property, Taxable Property Owner Association Property, Taxable Public Property, or Undeveloped Property and all such Taxable Property shall be subject to the levy of Special Taxes in accordance with the rate and method of apportionment pursuant to the sections below. The property in Improvement Area No. 1 is residential in use. The property in Improvement Area No. 2 is primarily commercial and contains Victoria Gardens. Community Facilities District No. 2001-01 (Improvement Area No. 1 and 2) 1 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT #10 Page 167 Resolution No. 18-067 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2001-01 ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FISCAL YEAR 2018/19 IM PROVEM ENT AREA NO. 1 LAND USE CLASS DESCRIPTION RESIDENTIAL FLOOR AREA ASSIGNED SPECIAL TAX 1 Single Family Property => 3,250 Sq Ft $1,115.90 per Dwelling Unit 2 Single Family Property 2,950 to 3,249 Sq Ft $894.84 per Dwelling Unit 3 Single Family Property 2,650 to 2,949 Sq Ft $805.04 per Dwelling Unit 4 Single Family Property 2,350 to 2,649 Sq Ft $691.32 per Dwelling Unit 5 Single Family Property 2,150 to 2,349 Sq Ft $646.69 per Dwelling Unit 6 Single Family Property 1,950 to 2,149 Sq Ft $594.61 per Dwelling Unit 7 Single Family Property < 1,950 Sq Ft $498.43 per Dwelling Unit 8 Apartment Property Not Applicable $125.94 per Dwelling Unit 9 Non -Residential Property Not Applicable $4,462.52 per Acre IM PROVEM ENT AREA NO. 2 LAND USE CLASS DESCRIPTION ASSIGNED SPECIAL TAX 1 Apartment Property $125.94 Per Dwelling Unit 2 Other Residential Property $5,721.95 per Acre 3 Non -Residential Property $0.33 Per Sq Ft. of Non -Residential Floor Area Community Facilities District No. 2001-01 (Improvement Area No. 1 and 2) 2 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT #10 Page 168 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2001-01 PROPOSED SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS Sources Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection Subtotal - Taxes Interest Revenue Total Proposed Sources Uses Debt Service Principal Repayments Interest Expense Subtotal - Debt Service Contract Services Assessment Administration Adm in./General Overhead Total Proposed Uses Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance Community Facilities District No. 2001-01 (Improvement Area No. 1 and 2) Fiscal Year 2018/19 Resolution No. 18-067 Fiscal Year 2018/19 Budget $ 666,460 1,800 668,260 130 $ 668,390 $ 372,000 226,670 598,670 1,000 51,600 200 $ 651,470 $ 16,920 3 ATTACHMENT #10 Page 169 'k— C4 (ZI ,rt 00 N .� � E 2 � � 2 CL L � .� � E E 0 � AYue«H AV Rm LLIJ AV p@mme AV ueu 9H I G a 9weo \ % epu §#e\2O_. AV J9jS9q0Gj \ / ± 2 / 3 nytJma Resolution Na 18-067 AV rFg 5 \ AvP,pu :. 6 2wmm8 | AV u9»n Community Facilities District Na 2001 -01 (Improvement Area No. ] and 2) 4 Fiscal Year 2O]&]g ATTACHMENT #10 Page 170 AV Ue&eH AV aoLUJ eH Req%E)+ -'AV ue Q9N AV Pink% ))j\ /| ��|�|•��l��� A )1[/§§ LL \����� Community Facilities District Na 2001 -01 (Improvement Area No. ] and 2) 4 Fiscal Year 2O]&]g ATTACHMENT #10 Page 170 RESOLUTION NO. 18-068 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2001-01 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 3) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018/19 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, (hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body of the local Agency"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code for the State of California. This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as Community Facilities District No. 2001-01 (Improvement Area No. 3) (hereinafter referred to as the "District"); and WHEREAS, at this time, bonds were previously issued for purposes of financing the project facilities for said District (the "Prior Special Tax Bonds"); and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said District, and this legislative body, by the adoption of Resolution No. 15-150 on August 5, 2015, previously established the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the fiscal year based, in part, upon the debt service payable on the Prior Special Tax Bonds; and WHEREAS, on July 30, 2015, special tax refunding bonds were issued by the District to refund the Prior Special Tax Bonds resulting in a reduction in the debt service payable from the special taxes levied within the District. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the special tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for Fiscal Year 2018/19 for the District are hereby determined and established as set forth in the attached, referenced and incorporated in the Annual Status Report. SECTION 3: That the rates as set forth in such Annual Status Report do not exceed the amount as previously authorized by Ordinance of this legislative body, and are not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the special tax are used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: A. Payment of principal of and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness; B. Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds; C. Payment of costs and expenses of administering the District and any bonds of the District; and D. Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate. Resolution No. 18-068 — Page 1 of 2 ATTACHMENT #Age 171 The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. SECTION 5: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax. SECTION 6: All monies above collected shall be paid into the District funds, including but not limited to, any special tax fund, bond fund, and reserve fund. SECTION 7: The County Auditor is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land effected in a space marked "public improvements, special tax", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special tax, and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Annual Status Report. SECTION 8: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties, and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 1St day of August 2018. Resolution No. 18-068 — Page 2 of 2 ATTACHMENT #Age 172 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2001-01 IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 3 ANNUAL STATUS REPORT AUGUST, 2018 Page 173 Resolution No. 18-068 BACKGROUND On June 20, 2001, an election was held and the property owners within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 2001-01 (Improvement Area Nos. 3) (the "District") authorized the District to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $935,000. On August 15, 2001, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 01-019 authorizing the issuance of bonds. Bonds were issued on August 29, 2001, to share in the financing of public street improvements required for the development of the property within the District; including, improvements to Day Creek, Victoria Park, Church, Foothill, Base Line and Arbor; landscaping improvements within public right-of-way; and storm drain and flood control improvements. On December 7, 2011, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 11-179 authorizing the issuance of special tax refunding bonds for this District. The Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Series 2012, in the principal amount of $9,093,000 were issued on December 21, 2011. This amount represented the outstanding principal balance of the original bonds as of this date. On July 1, 2015, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 15-115 authorizing the issuance of special tax refunding bonds for this District in conjunction with various other Community Facilities Districts. The Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Series 2015 were refunded with a total principal amount of $18,546,000 and were issued on July 30, 2015. By authorizing this refunding, the City Council provided savings to the property owners for the remaining life of the bond issue, that translated to a 6.29% overall reduction in the annual debt service payment paid by property owners. The special tax shall be levied only so long as required for each parcel of taxable property to discharge bond obligations. Each fiscal year, all Taxable Property within each Zone of Improvement Area No. 3 shall be classified as Taxable or Non -Taxable Property and all such Taxable Property shall be subject to the levy of Special Taxes in accordance with the rate and method of apportionment pursuant to the section below. Community Facilities District No. 2001-01 (Improvement Area 3) 1 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT #12 Page 174 Resolution No. 18-068 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2001-01 ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FISCAL YEAR 2018/19 TAXABLE BOND SHARE ASSIGNED TAX ACREAGE PER ACRE ZONE 7-LEGGIO 37.48 8.30% $1,640.00 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2001-01 PROPOSED SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS Community Facilities District No. 2001-01 (Improvement Area 3) 2 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT #12 Page 175 Fiscal Year 2018/19 Budget Sources Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies $ 61,470 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection - Subtotal - Taxes 61,470 Other Revenues 20 Total Proposed Sources $ 61,490 Uses Debt Service Principal Repayments $ 36,000 Interest Expense 21,940 Subtotal - Debt Service 57,940 Adm in./General Overhead 40 Total Proposed Uses $ 58,980 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ 2,510 Community Facilities District No. 2001-01 (Improvement Area 3) 2 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT #12 Page 175 :v um 9w 0 \ AV 2puem a�& &SkO �. A :% u+eH | | zv2m� el| | :vPr99w� Z A :8W 9R I . eugemag| - &gym Resolution Na 18-068 LD 2 6 AV we] / £ vEPUE*e AV J@seqU I f AV UgAgH § AV ESOWJiDH \ � . . � &gym Resolution Na 18-068 LD 2 6 AV we] / £ vEPUE*e AV J@seqU I Community Facilities District No 2001 -01 (improvement Area 3) a Fiscal Year 2O]&]g ATTACHMENT #12 Page 176 AV UgAgH AV ESOWJiDH AV Eeq%o+ -AV u,2§aH AV Pie R )j\§ ! \j�` � � §/• } / GS � §/§) � Community Facilities District No 2001 -01 (improvement Area 3) a Fiscal Year 2O]&]g ATTACHMENT #12 Page 176 RESOLUTION NO. 18-069 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX RATE FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2003-01 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 1) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018/19 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, (hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body of the local Agency"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code for the State of California. This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as Community Facilities District No. 2003-01 (Improvement Area No. 1) (hereinafter referred to as the "District"); and WHEREAS, at this time, bonds have been authorized for purposes of financing the project facilities for said District; and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said District, and this legislative body is desirous to establish the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the fiscal year. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the special tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for Fiscal Year 2018/19 for the referenced District are hereby determined and established as set forth in the attached, referenced and incorporated in the Annual Status Report. SECTION 3: That the rate as set forth above does not exceed the amount as previously authorized by Ordinance of this legislative body, and is not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the special tax are used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: A. Payment of principal of and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness; B. Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds; C. Payment of costs and expenses of authorized public facilities and public services; and D. Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate. The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. SECTION 5: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax. Resolution No. 18-069 — Page 1 of 2 ATTACH MENT,#J�177 SECTION 6: All monies above collected shall be paid into the District funds, including but not limited to, any special tax fund, bond fund, and reserve fund. SECTION 7: The County Auditor is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land effected in a space marked "public improvements, special tax", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special tax, and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Annual Status Report. SECTION 8: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties, and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 1St day of August 2018. Resolution No. 18-069 — Page 2 of 2 ATTACH MENT,#J�178 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003-01 IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 1 ANNUAL STATUS REPORT AUGUST 2018 Page 179 Resolution No. 18-069 BACKGROUND On February 19, 2003, an election was held and the property owners within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 2003-01 (Improvement Area No. 1) authorized the District to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $14,645,000. On March 5, 2003, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 699 approving the levy of the special tax and on May 21, 2003 approved Resolution No. 03-125 authorizing the issuance of bonds. The District consists of approximately 229 gross acres, of which 147 acres are designated as Improvement Area No. 1. The District boundary is located in the eastern part of the City generally west of Interstate 15, south of Church, north of Arrow and east of the Southern California Edison easement corridor from Arrow north, to Foothill and Day Creek from Foothill north, to Church. The District is located within the Victoria Planned Community. Bonds were issued on August 20, 2003, to share in the provision of funds for the purpose of financing the acquisition and construction of the facilities which consist of Day Creek, Victoria Park, Church, Foothill, Base Line and Arbor; storm drain and flood control facilities and water and sewer improvements to be owned and operated by Cucamonga Valley Water District; and a cultural center owned by the City, that includes a performing arts center, public library and banquet hall/meeting room. On July 3, 2013, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 13-110 authorizing the issuance of special tax refunding bonds for this District. The Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Series 2013, in the principal amount of $14,170,000 were issued on July 30, 2013. This amount represented the outstanding principal balance of the original bonds as of this date. The rates for the District will increase by 5.0 % in Fiscal Year 2018/19 because the current rate is not sufficient to meet fiscal obligations for the District. The special tax shall be levied only so long as required for each parcel of taxable property to discharge bond obligations. Each fiscal year, all Taxable Property within Zone 1, Zone 2 and Zone 3 of the District shall be classified as Developed Property or Undeveloped Property and shall be subject to the levy of Special Taxes in accordance with the rate and method of apportionment pursuant to the sections below. Community Facilities District No. 2003-01 (Improvement Area 1) 1 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT #14 Page 180 Resolution No. 18-069 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003-01 ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FISCAL YEAR 2018/19 Community Facilities District No. 2003-01 (Improvement Area 1) 2 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT #14 Page 181 ASSIGNED SPECIAL BACKUP TAX SPECIAL TAX (per acre] (per acre] NOTE ZONE 1 DEVELOPED Both Assigned and Backup PROPERTY $5,854.41 $6,457.48 can increase 2% every year ZONE 1 UNDEVELOPED Backup can increase 2% PROPERTY $0.00 $6,457.48 every year ZONE 2 DEVELOPED Both Assigned and Backup PROPERTY $10,590.83 $54,274.83 can increase 2% every year ZONE 2 UNDEVELOPED Backup can increase 2% PROPERTY $0.00 $17,250.00 every year ZONE 3 DEVELOPED Both Assigned and Backup PROPERTY $9,896.65 $15,360.40 can increase 2% every year ZONE 3 UNDEVELOPED Backup can increase 2% PROPERTY $0.00 $15,360.40 every year Community Facilities District No. 2003-01 (Improvement Area 1) 2 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT #14 Page 181 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003-01 PROPOSED SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS Sources Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection Subtotal - Taxes Interest Revenue Total Proposed Sources Uses Debt Service Principal Repayments Interest Expense Subtotal - Debt Service Contract Services Assessment Administration Adm in./General Overhead Total Proposed Uses Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance Community Facilities District No. 2003-01 (Improvement Area 1) Fiscal Year 2018/19 Resolution No. 18-069 Fiscal Year 2018/19 Budget $ 1,131,510 450 1,131,960 4,430 $ 1,136,390 $ 395,000 639,960 1,034,960 2,000 37,190 270 $ 1,074,420 $ 61,970 3 ATTACHMENT #14 Page 182 Resolution No. 18-069 Community Facilities District No. 2003-01 (Improvement Area 1) 4 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT #14 Page 183 M Q)s CC. QC C . -) �nC5 G C C NV flJego = U r 1 N O O (� LL < 1AV epUUM43 AV epuem.13 I B@J ' Ay J;3jSagOOd ny JatsayOo�j i AV"Wi!w r•--••--•— Jas llgrj k 1 � 1 1 AV li9AE { ' 1 A'q' JoA2H 1 1 72SOWJaH ' Ay I Ay ssaLUJaL, AV pleglgojV AV pleglqaJV Aq+LJbLU H r•• nyUPWIIGH 1 � A JB OUA p llp� �ShE i �j S~ IJs?11BlJlg j 1 s�•� � i "v -j ETg C1 f � t—J AV 9AOJ e F 4 F F _ g PPL dy lg� Community Facilities District No. 2003-01 (Improvement Area 1) 4 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT #14 Page 183 RESOLUTION NO. 18-070 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2003-01 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 2) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018/19 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, (hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body of the local Agency"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code for the State of California. This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as Community Facilities District No. 2003-01 (Improvement Area No. 2) (hereinafter referred to as the "District"); and WHEREAS, at this time, bonds have been authorized for purposes of financing the project facilities for said District; and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said District, and this legislative body is desirous to establish the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the fiscal year. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the special tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for Fiscal Year 2018/19 for the referenced District are hereby determined and established as set forth in the attached, referenced and incorporated in the Annual Status Report. SECTION 3: That the rate as set forth above does not exceed the amount as previously authorized by Ordinance of this legislative body, and is not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the special tax are used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: A. Payment of principal of and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness; B. Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds; C. Payment of costs and expenses of authorized public facilities and public services; and D. Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate. The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. SECTION 5: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in Resolution No. 18-070 — Page 1 of 2 ATTACHMENT #nge 184 cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax. SECTION 6: All monies above collected shall be paid into the District funds, including but not limited to, any special tax fund, bond fund, and reserve fund. SECTION 7: The County Auditor is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land effected in a space marked "public improvements, special tax", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special tax, and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Annual Status Report. SECTION 8: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties, and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 111 day of August 2018. Resolution No. 18-070 — Page 2 of 2 ATTACHMENT #nge 185 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003-01 IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 2 ANNUAL STATUS REPORT AUGUST 2018 Page 186 Resolution No. 18-070 BACKGROUND On February 19, 2003, an election was held and the property owners within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 2003-01 (Improvement Area No. 2) (the "District") authorized the District to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $2,855,000. On March 5, 2003, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 699 approving the levy of the special tax and on May 21, 2003, approved Resolution No. 03-125 authorizing the issuance of bonds. The District consists of approximately 229 gross acres, of which 82 acres are designated as Improvement Area No. 2 (Zones 1 and 2). The District boundary is located in the eastern part of the City generally west of Interstate 15, south of Church, north of Arrow and east of Southern California Edison easement corridor from Arrow north, to Foothill and Day Creek from Foothill north, to Church. The District is located within the Victoria Planned Community. Bonds were issued on August 20, 2003, to share in the provision of funds for the purpose of financing the acquisition and construction of the facilities which consist of Day Creek, Victoria Park, Church, Foothill, Base Line and Arbor; storm drain and flood control facilities and water and sewer improvements to be owned and operated by Cucamonga Valley Water District; and a cultural center owned by the City, that includes a performing arts center, public library and banquet hall/meeting room. On September 17, 2013, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 13-162 authorizing the issuance of special tax refunding bonds for this District. The Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Series 2013, in the principal amount of $2,784,000 were issued on September 30, 2013. This amount represented the outstanding principal balance of the original bonds as of this date. The rates for the District will increase in Fiscal Year 2018/19 because the current rate is not sufficient to meet fiscal obligations for the district. The special tax shall be levied only so long as required for each parcel of taxable property to discharge bond obligations. Each fiscal year, all Taxable Property within Zone 1 and Zone 2 of the District shall be classified as Developed Property or Undeveloped Property and shall be subject to the levy of Special Taxes in accordance with the rate and method of apportionment determined pursuant to the sections below. Community Facilities District No. 2003-01 (Improvement Area 2) 1 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT #16 Page 187 Resolution No. 18-070 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003-01 ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FISCAL YEAR 2018/19 Community Facilities District No. 2003-01 (Improvement Area 2) 2 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT #16 Page 188 ASSIGNED SPECIAL BACKUP TAX SPECIAL TAX (per acre) (per acre) NOTE ZONE 1 Both Assigned and DEVELOPED Backup can increase PROPERTY $2,447.59 $4,103.58 2% every year ZONE 1 UNDEVELOPED Backup can increase PROPERTY $0.00 $4,103.58 2% every year ZONE 2 Both Assigned and DEVELOPED Backup can increase PROPERTY $7,438.74 $12,433.45 2% every year ZONE 2 UNDEVELOPED Backup can increase PROPERTY $0.00 $12,433.45 2% every year Community Facilities District No. 2003-01 (Improvement Area 2) 2 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT #16 Page 188 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003-01 PROPOSED SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS Sources Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies Interest Revenue Total Proposed Sources Uses Debt Service: Principal Repayments Interest Expense Subtotal - Debt Service Contract Services Assessment Administration Adm in./General Overhead Total Proposed Uses Resolution No. 18-070 Fiscal Year 2018/19 Budget $ 201,050 1,890 $ 202,940 $ 79,000 107,130 186,130 2,500 9,260 110 $ 198,000 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ 4,940 Community Facilities District No. 2003-01 (Improvement Area 2) 3 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT #16 Page 189 V- :%a+eH C; C @ AV peq %:+ � � � @ > / � E S � 2 \ � O �---- C � � � E � | � | a@O Fn E g }h§§§ |i / / 2 h|§|\ 5 � \|[ ) ]{ � E | % |g- ----- --------- AVJapGqO08 | A � | A2 66A8H | 2mwJ;H� AV pFmm+AV | | u eqI@ | I IS U!EIISUJUO f § f \ 3 = m . 2 AV tj«S Resolution Na 18-070 2 �a5 \ r9 M CO: <E \ z( � / k � 7 / G # / 10 § \ � AV we] 3 f 1zveWr®G AV Jaeaqoo8 :#uaYnA Community Facilities District No 2003-01 (improvement Area 2) 4 Fiscal Year 20]&]g ATTACHMENT #16 Page 190 :%a+eH &y2oLUJOH AV peq %:+ -AV uem9H � � J % AV Pia ){ R: � j� Aja:.� \|�Jill' � a@O Fn E g }h§§§ |i / / 2 h|§|\ 5 � \|[ ) ]{ Community Facilities District No 2003-01 (improvement Area 2) 4 Fiscal Year 20]&]g ATTACHMENT #16 Page 190 RESOLUTION NO. 18-071 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2004-01 (RANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATES) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018/19 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, (hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body of the local Agency"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code for the State of California. This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as Community Facilities District No. 2004-01 (Rancho Etiwanda Estates) (hereinafter referred to as the "District"); and WHEREAS, at this time, bonds have been authorized for purposes of financing the project facilities for said District; and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said District, and this legislative body is desirous to establish the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the fiscal year. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the special tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for Fiscal Year 2018/19 for the referenced District is hereby determined and established as set forth in the attached, referenced and incorporated in the Annual Status Report. SECTION 3: That the rate as set forth above does not exceed the amount as previously authorized by Ordinance of this legislative body, and is not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the special tax are used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: A. Payment of principal of and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness; B. Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds; C. Payment of costs and expenses of authorized public facilities and public services; and D. Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate. The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. SECTION 5: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax. Resolution No. 18-071 — Page 1 of 2 ATTACHMENT #Hge 191 SECTION 6: All monies above collected shall be paid into the District funds, including but not limited to, any special tax fund, bond fund, and reserve fund. SECTION 7: The County Auditor is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land effected in a space marked "public improvements, special tax", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special tax, and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Annual Status Report. SECTION 8: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties, and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 1St day of August 2018. Resolution No. 18-071 — Page 2 of 2 ATTACHMENT #Age 192 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2004-01 RANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATES ANNUAL STATUS REPORT AUGUST 2018 Page 193 Resolution No. 18-071 BACKGROUND On September 15, 2004, an election was held and the property owners within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 2004-01 (the "District") authorized the District to incur bonded indebtedness in the maximum principal amount of $45,000,000. On October 6, 2004, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 735 approving the levy of the special tax and on June 7, 2006 approved Resolution No. 06-185 authorizing the issuance of bonds. Bonds were issued on July 13, 2006 to share in the provision of funds for the acquisition and construction of certain public facilities, to serve property located within the District. The District was authorized to finance the following improvements: • Day Creek Boulevard - grading, storm drain, sewer, water, dry utilities, streets and landscaping, • Etiwanda Avenue - grading, sewer, water, dry utilities, streets and landscaping; • Cucamonga Valley Water District ("CVWD") reservoir transmission main, • Storm drain facilities including the northern property line storm drain and the Etiwanda Avenue storm drain, • Park facilities, • Equestrian facilities, • School facilities now owned by the Etiwanda School District and by the Chaffey Joint Union High School District, • Water and sewer facilities now owned by CVWD which were authorized and financed from the proceeds of capacity charges levied by CVWD, • Flood control facilities now owned by the San Bernardino County Flood Control District and • Open space owned by the County of San Bernardino. On January 15, 2014, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 14-005 authorizing the issuance of special tax refunding bonds for this District. The Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Series 2014 in the principal amount of $34,384,000 were issued on February 07, 2014. This amount represented the outstanding principal of the original bonds as of this date. The rates for the District will not increase in Fiscal Year 2018/19 because the current rate is sufficient to meet fiscal obligations for the district. The special tax shall be levied only so long as required for each parcel of taxable property to discharge bond obligations. Community Facilities District No. 2004-01 (Rancho Etiwanda Estates) 1 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT #18 Page 194 Resolution No. 18-071 TERM OF SPECIAL TAX The Special Tax shall be levied for a period not to exceed fifty years commencing with Fiscal Year 2005/06 provided, however, that special taxes will cease to be levied in an earlier fiscal year if the Community Facilities District Administrator has determined (i) that all required interest and principal payments on the District's bonds have been paid; and (ii) all authorized facilities have been constructed. ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX Land Use Category 1 -Residential Property 2 -Residential Property 3 -Residential Property 4 -Residential Property 5 -Residential Property 6 -Non -Residential Property FISCAL YEAR 2018/19 Maximum Special Actual Special Developed Floor Area Tax Tax Greater than 4,000 sq ft $5,555 per unit $5,194 per unit 3,801 - 4,000 sq ft $5,325 per unit $4,979 per unit 3,601 - 3,800 sq ft $5,151 per unit $4,817 per unit 3,401 - 3,600 sq ft $4,896 per unit $4,578 per unit Less than 3,400 sq ft NA $4,410 per unit $14,800 per acre Community Facilities District No. 2004-01 (Rancho Etiwanda Estates) Fiscal Year 2018/19 $4,124 per unit $0.00 per acre 2 ATTACHMENT #18 Page 195 Resolution No. 18-071 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2004-01 PROPOSED SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS Fiscal Year 2018/19 Budget Sources Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies $ 2,646,840 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 23,500 Subtotal - Taxes 2,670,340 Interest Revenue 17,560 Total Proposed Sources $ 2,687,900 Uses Debt Service Principal Repayments Interest Expense Subtotal - Debt Service Contract Services Assessment Administration Adm in./General Overhead Total Proposed Uses Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance Community Facilities District No. 2004-01 (Rancho Etiwanda Estates) Fiscal Year 2018/19 $ 1,093,000 1,261,750 2,354,750 2,000 29,190 580 $ 2,386,520 $ 301,380 3 ATTACHMENT #18 Page 196 z ra ir~ O U AV uaN111!" AV UaAgH Ay esoLuJaH AV RIeQ!LPJV Ay uewllaH }S uellau erg!] 3 6 -w Av Ja }sa po 3 AV AJJOgo v q� c Cn as = � In o P LL - Resolution No. 18-071 AV JS'ea �+7 Ay Epue!J�3 PLV ja�sayz]oH I Alf ua !Iffy IAV UWUH jj A V E 90 WAUH I! AV ple-q!4�Jb' H �+ AV uaLUIlaH Ay p e,aul w0• tie' t M Community Facilities District No. 2004-01 (Rancho Etiwanda Estates) 4 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT #18 Page 197 m r c+i � 9 J.o {'.J i W J � LO sV 0 AV JS'ea �+7 Ay Epue!J�3 PLV ja�sayz]oH I Alf ua !Iffy IAV UWUH jj A V E 90 WAUH I! AV ple-q!4�Jb' H �+ AV uaLUIlaH Ay p e,aul w0• tie' t M Community Facilities District No. 2004-01 (Rancho Etiwanda Estates) 4 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT #18 Page 197 RESOLUTION NO. 18-072 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2006-01 (VINTNER'S GROVE) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018/19 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, (hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body of the local Agency"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code for the State of California. This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as Community Facilities District No. 2006-01 (Vintner's Grove) (hereinafter referred to as the "District"); and WHEREAS, at this time, bonds were previously issued for purposes of financing the project facilities for said District (the "Prior Special Tax Bonds"); and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said District, and this legislative body, by the adoption of Resolution No. 15-151 on August 5, 2015, established the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the fiscal year based, in part, upon the debt service payable on the Prior Special Tax Bonds; and WHEREAS, on July 30, 2015, special tax refunding bonds were issued by the District to refund the Prior Special Tax Bonds resulting in a reduction in the debt service payable from the special taxes levied within the District; and NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the special tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for Fiscal Year 2018/19 for the District are hereby determined and established as set forth in the attached, referenced and incorporated in the Annual Status Report. SECTION 3: That the rates as set forth in such Annual Status Report do not exceed the amount as previously authorized by Ordinance of this legislative body, and are not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the special tax are used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: A. Payment of principal of and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness; B. Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds; C. Payment of costs and expenses of administering the District and any bonds of the District; and D. Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate. Resolution No. 18-072 — Page 1 of 2 ATTACHMENT 4nge 198 The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. SECTION 5: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax. SECTION 6: All monies above collected shall be paid into the District funds, including but not limited to, any special tax fund, bond fund, and reserve fund. SECTION 7: The County Auditor is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land effected in a space marked "public improvements, special tax", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special tax, and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Annual Status Report. SECTION 8: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties, and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 1St day of August 2018. Resolution No. 18-072 — Page 2 of 2 ATTACHMENT #nge 199 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2006-01 VINTNER'S GROVE ANNUAL STATUS REPORT AUGUST 2018 Page 200 Resolution No. 18-072 BACKGROUND On October 18, 2006, an election was held and the property owners within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 2006-01 (Vintner's Grove) (the "District") authorized the District to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $5,800,000. On November 1, 2006, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 769 approving the levy of the special tax and on December 20, 2006 approved Resolution No. 06-401 authorizing the issuance of bonds. The District boundary is located on the south side of Arrow, east of Center, north of 26t' and west of Haven. Bonds were issued on January 25, 2007, to share in the provision of funds for the acquisition of street improvements, landscape improvements within the public right-of- way and water and sewer improvements. On July 1, 2015, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 15-115 authorizing the issuance of special tax refunding bonds for this District in conjunction with various other Community Facilities Districts. The Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Series 2015 were refunded with a total principal amount of $18,546,000 and were issued on July 30, 2015. By authorizing this refunding, the City Council provided savings to the property owners for the remaining life of the bond issue, that translated to a 37.85% overall reduction in the annual debt service payment paid by property owners. This special tax shall be levied only so long as required for each parcel of taxable property to discharge bond obligations. Each fiscal year, all Taxable Property within the District shall be classified as Developed Property or Undeveloped Property and shall be subject to the levy of Special Taxes in accordance with the rate and method of apportionment determined pursuant to the section below. Community Facilities District No. 2006-01 1 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT #20 Page 201 Resolution No. 18-072 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2006-01 (VINTNER'S GROVE) ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FISCAL YEAR 2018/19 Floor Plan Home Size (Sq. Ft.) Number of Units Special Tax Tri-Plex Plan 1 1,335 26 $1,444.32 Tri-Plex Plan 2 1,803 26 $1,664.32 Tri-Plex Plan 3 1,920 26 $1,723.98 SFD Plan 4 2,188 28 $1,932.18 SFD Plan 5 2,627 28 $2,099.98 SFD Plan 6 3,173 22 $2,291.39 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2006-01 PROPOSED SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS Community Facilities District No. 2006-01 2 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT #20 Page 202 Fiscal Year 2018/19 Budget Sources Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies $ 288,960 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 2,500 Subtotal - Taxes 291,460 Interest Revenue 2,430 Total Proposed Sources $ 293,890 Uses Debt Service Principal Repayments $ 123,000 Interest Expense 134,870 Subtotal - Debt Service 257,870 Contract Services 1,000 Assessment Administration 18,820 Admin./General Overhead 130 Total Proposed Uses $ 277,820 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ 16,070 Community Facilities District No. 2006-01 2 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT #20 Page 202 Resolution No. 18-072 Community Facilities District No. 2008'01 3 Fiscal Year 2O18/1Q ATTACHMENT #20 Page 203 AV Ajjgqo in LL AV J6 J5 8 LW�j AV U;qt�A15�H AV E!SCWJeH AV F'SOWARH AV Pleq!!qojv AV P113 q! 401 v AV LJk!LUllaH Lw�j AV UOLU110H EA dF In Community Facilities District No. 2008'01 3 Fiscal Year 2O18/1Q ATTACHMENT #20 Page 203 RESOLUTION NO. 18-073 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2006-02 (AMADOR ON ROUTE 66) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018/19 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, (hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body of the local Agency"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code for the State of California. This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as Community Facilities District No. 2006-02 (Amador on Route 66) (hereinafter referred to as the "District"); and WHEREAS, at this time, bonds were previously issued for purposes of financing the project facilities for said District (the "Prior Special Tax Bonds"); and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said District, and this legislative body, by the adoption of Resolution No. 15-152 on August 5, 2015, established the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the fiscal year based, in part, upon the debt service payable on the Prior Special Tax Bonds; and WHEREAS, on July 30, 2015, special tax refunding bonds were issued by the District to refund the Prior Special Tax Bonds resulting a reduction in the debt service payable from the special taxes levied within the District. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the special tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for Fiscal Year 2018/19 for the District is hereby determined and established as set forth in the attached, referenced and incorporated in the Annual Status Report. SECTION 3: That the rates as set forth in such Annual Status Report do not exceed the amount as previously authorized by Ordinance of this legislative body, and are not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the special tax are used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: A. Payment of principal of and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness; B. Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds; C. Payment of costs and expenses of administering the District and any bonds of the District; and D. Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate. Resolution No. 18-073 — Page 1 of 2 ATTACHMENT #Age 204 The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. SECTION 5: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax. SECTION 6: All monies above collected shall be paid into the District funds, including but not limited to, any special tax fund, bond fund, and reserve fund. SECTION 7: The County Auditor is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land effected in a space marked "public improvements, special tax", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special tax, and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Annual Status Report. SECTION 8: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties, and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 1St day of August 2018. Resolution No. 18-073 — Page 2 of 2 ATTACHMENT #Age 205 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2006-02 AMADOR ON ROUTE 66 ANNUAL STATUS REPORT AUGUST 2018 Page 206 Resolution No. 18-073 BACKGROUND On October 18, 2006, an election was held and the property owners within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 2006-02 (Amador on Route 66) (the "District") authorized the District to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $2,980,000. On November 1, 2006, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 770 approving the levy of the special tax and on December 20, 2006 approved Resolution No. 06-402 authorizing the issuance of bonds. The District boundary is located south of Garcia, east of Etiwanda, north of Foothill and west of East. Bonds were issued on January 25, 2007, to share in the provision of funds for the acquisition of street improvements, landscape improvements within the public right-of- way and water and sewer improvements. On July 1, 2015, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 15-115 authorizing the issuance of special tax refunding bonds for this District in conjunction with various other Community Facilities Districts. The Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Series 2015, were refunded with a total principal amount of $18,546,000 and were issued on July 30, 2015. By authorizing this refunding, the City Council provided savings to the property owners for the remaining life of the bond issue, that translated to a 28.42% overall reduction in the annual debt service payment paid by property owners. This special tax shall be levied only so long as required for each parcel of taxable property to discharge bond obligations. Each fiscal year, all Taxable Property within the District shall be classified as Developed Property, Taxable Public Property, Taxable Property Owner Association Property or Undeveloped Property and shall be subject to the levy of Special Taxes in accordance with the rate and method of apportionment determined pursuant to the section below. Community Facilities District No. 2006-02 1 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT #22 Page 207 Resolution No. 18-073 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2006-02 (AMADOR ON ROUTE 66) ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FISCAL YEAR 2018/19 Land Use Class Description 1 Single Family Detached Property 2 Single Family Detached Property 3 Single Family Detached Property 4 Single Family Detached Property 5 Non -Residential Property Residential Floor Area >1,850 Sq. Ft. 1,601 - 1,850 Sq. Ft. 1,351 - 1,600 Sq. Ft. <1,351 N/A COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2006-02 PROPOSED SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS Community Facilities District No. 2006-02 2 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT #22 Page 208 Fiscal Year 2018/19 Budget Sources Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies $ 183,160 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 12,500 Subtotal - Taxes 195,660 Interest Revenue 1,670 Total Proposed Sources $ 197,330 Uses Debt Service Principal Repayments $ 74,000 Interest Expense 80,480 Subtotal - Debt Service 154,480 Contract Services 1,000 Assessment Administration 18,830 Admin./General Overhead 100 Total Proposed Uses $ 174,410 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ 22,920 Community Facilities District No. 2006-02 2 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT #22 Page 208 Resolution No. 18-073 Community Facilities District No. 2006-02 3 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT #22 Page 209 O �A r.I N O 0 N CD 0 00 N J o LL U U . o nti AJJayo J ti.r uCD D J N m � + i M L 2 i ii Q (� .. —j ny }se3 � LL I ® I c ny epueMg3' ii ny epuennl;3 � II � 1 II 19 �aaJo Aea ny JaIsayooH nd Ja}sayooH II ny uaI!II!lN r._.._.._.._.._ _ I ny uaj!II!W i ii � II AV uaneH nd uaneH ny esouJJaH ny esOWJaH i I nt/ PIeQ!yoJt1 nd i II PIe9!yoJt/ nd ueWIIOH II ny ueuallaH i ,rN U s L � nt/ PJe�tau!n 1S ue!lauJeo ' s°mPs 2 00 00 LL 4 - =o Community Facilities District No. 2006-02 3 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT #22 Page 209 DATE: August 1, 2018 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director Noah Daniels, Finance Manager SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE RESOLUTION CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAMS AND ASSESSMENTS; APPROVE THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS; AND ORDER THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4-R, 5, 6-R, 7, 8, 9 AND 10, STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 AND PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. PD -85 FOR FISCAL YEAR2018/19. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council conduct the public hearing, and adopt Resolutions confirming the assessment diagrams and levy of assessments for the Landscape Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3A, 313, 4-R, 5, 6-R, 7, 8, 9 and 10, Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 and Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD -85 for Fiscal Year 2018/19. BACKGROUND: Landscape Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3A, 313, 4-R, 5, 6-R, 7, 8, 9 and 10 generally provide for the maintenance and operation of parks and other landscaping. Maintenance and operation includes, but is not limited to, turf, ground cover, planter beds, shrubs, plants and trees, landscape lighting, irrigation systems, electrical energy for irrigation controllers, insect/disease control, graffiti removal, hardscapes, entry signs, sound walls and all appurtenant facilities. The City utilizes current year assessment revenues, fund balances, and (in some cases) contributions from the General Fund to meet each district's annual expenses. When the landscape maintenance districts were established, they were created in conjunction with new development coming into the City and were intentionally designed to ensure that each district bore the costs of the maintenance of the infrastructure that provides special benefit to the property owners. However, in certain districts, it has been decades since there was an assessment increase so the services have been reduced, and/or been supplemented by General Fund contributions. General Fund contributions are limited by City Council policy. Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 generally provide for the maintenance and operation of street lights, traffic signals and appurtenant facilities. This maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of street lighting maintenance, including repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement providing for illumination of the subject area in connection with these Districts. In Fiscal Year 2016/17, the City Council authorized the purchase of Southern California Edison's existing street light system within the City. Funding was provided from the City's Capital Reserve Fund for the Page 210 purchase of the street lights and installation of Light Emitting Diode (LED) street lighting and will be repaid over a 20 -year period from electric utility savings in the street lighting maintenance districts. Similar to the landscape maintenance districts, the street lighting maintenance districts were designed to ensure that each district bore the costs of the maintenance for the infrastructure that provides special benefit to the property owners. However, since assessment rates cannot be increased without a vote by the property owners, some services must be supplemented by General Fund contributions. Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD -85 is a combination Improvement and Maintenance District. The District provides the maintenance and operation of Red Hill and Heritage Community Parks including, but not limited to, grading, planting, irrigation, onsite roads, sidewalks, parking lots, lighting, waterscape, restrooms, senior citizens' facilities, playground equipment, picnic facilities, major lighted athletic facilities, jogging trails, sanitary sewer connections and onsite drainage inlets. On July 18, 2018, the City Council adopted resolutions ordering the preparation of the Annual Engineer's Reports for the levy of annual assessments for the Landscape Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4- R, 5, 6-R, 7, 8, 9 and 10, Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 and Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD -85 (each a "District" and collectively, the "Districts"). The Annual Engineer's Report is prepared by a registered engineer and contains five parts: 1. Plans and Specifications for the District improvements; 2. A cost estimate of the improvements; 3. An assessment diagram of the area to be assessed; 4. Method of apportionment of assessment; and 5. An assessment roll listing the parcels to be assessed. The purpose of the Annual Engineer's Report is to provide a public document that describes the improvements expected to be installed or maintained by the District, describes the level of benefit of each parcel in a District and provides proposed assessment amounts for each parcel. ANALYSIS: City staff has prepared the Annual Engineer's Reports for the Districts and filed them with the City Clerk. The reports contain detailed descriptions of the improvements and associated costs, the properties to be assessed and the proposed assessments on each parcel within each district. The Resolutions of Intention that were adopted on July 18, 2018 set the required public hearing forAugust 1, 2018, at 7:00 p.m. in the City of Rancho Cucamonga Council Chambers. Notices for all districts were published in accordance with the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972. After the public hearing, the City Council may adopt Resolutions confirming the levy of assessments as originally proposed for the Districts. Upon final adoption, the Districts will be reconfirmed for Fiscal Year 2018/19 and the assessment amounts will be posted to the County of San Bernardino tax rolls. These assessments will appear as a separate item on the property tax bill for each parcel. The table below summarizes the levy for each District for Fiscal Year 2018/19: Assessment Districts ProposLee District Notes LMD 1 (General City) $ 1,244,579 No change from prior year. LMD 2 $ 3,531,786 1 ncrease from prior year (Victoria Neighborhood Parks) for CPI factor. LMD 3A (Hyssop) $ 3,724 No change from prior year. LMD 3B (Commercial Industrial) $ 828,654 No change from prior year. LMD 4-R (Terra Vista Planned $ 2,740,765 No change from prior year Community) Page 211 Asses MnDtb stricts Prop ,r�gistrict No chang(NforM prior year. Levy LMD 6-R $ 509,875 Increase from prior year (Caryn Planned Community) for CPI factor. LMD 7 (North Etiwanda) $ 947,249 No change from prior year. LMD 8 (South Etiwanda) $ 34,261 No change from prior year. LMD 9 1 ncrease from prior year to (Lower Etiwanda) $ 513,064 reduce the use of fund balance. LMD 10 $578,983 1 ncrease from prior year (Rancho Etiwanda)for CPI factor. SLD 1 (Arterials) $ 816,196 No change from prior year. SLD 2 (Local Streets) $ 374,771 No change from prior year. SLD 3 (Victoria Planned Community) $ 356,430 No change from prior year. SLD 4 (Terra Vista Planned $ 163,933 No change from prior year. Community) SLD 5 (Caryn Planned Community) $ 44,150 No change from prior year. SLD 6 (Commercial Industrial) $ 135,944 No change from prior year. SLD 7 (North Etiwanda) $ 129,881 No change from prior year. SLD 8 (South Etiwanda) $ 70,955 No change from prior year. PD -85 (Red Hill and Heritage Parks) $ 1,161,167 No change from prior year. The assessment levy noted in the Annual Engineer's Report for each district are net of estimated delinquencies for budgetary purposes. In cases of delinquency and foreclosure, the parcels will be subject to penalties. If approved, City staff will file the certified list of all parcels subject to the assessment levy with the County of San Bernardino no later than the County's August 10, 2018 submittal deadline. Adoption of the Resolutions will provide for the Fiscal Year 2018/19 levy upon the parcels within each District that are not otherwise exempt from taxation, at the rates set forth in the attached Annual Engineer's Reports for Fiscal Year 2018/19. FISCAL IMPACT: The Districts are separate from the City General Fund. The assessment revenues that are collected for each District are used for the maintenance and operations for only that District. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This item addresses the City Council's goal to continue supporting and enhancing the long term financial sustainability of the City's special districts. ATTACHMENTS: Page 212 Description Attachment 1 -Annual Engineer's Report LMD1 Attachment 2 -Annual Engineer's Report LMD2 Attachment 3 -Annual Engineer's Report LMD3A Attachment -Annual Engineer's Report LMD3B Attachment 5 -Annual Engineer's Report LMD4-R Attachment 6 -Annual Engineer's Report LMD5 Attachment 7 -Annual Engineer's Report LMD6-R Attachment 8 -Annual Engineer's Report LMD7 Attachment 9 -Annual Engineer's Report LMD8 Attachment 10 -Annual Engineer's Report LMD9 Attachment 11 -Annual Engineer's Report LMD10 Attachment 12 -Annual Engineer's Report SLD1 Attachment 13 -Annual Engineer's Report SLD2 Attachment 14 -Annual Engineer's Report SLD3 Attachment 15 -Annual Engineer's Report SLD4 Attachment 16 -Annual Engineer's Report SLD5 Attachment 17 -Annual Engineer's Report SLD6 Attachment 18 -Annual Engineer's Report SLD7 Attachment 19 -Annual Engineer's Report SLD8 Attachment 20 -Annual Engineer's Report PD85 Attachment 21 - Resolution (LIVID Ordering the Levy and Collection of Special Assessment) Attachment 22 - Resolution (SLD Ordering the Levy and Collection of Special Assessment) Attachment 23 - Resolution (PD85 Ordering the Levy and Collection of Special Assessment) Page 213 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2018/19 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (General City) Page 214 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (GENERAL CITY) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2700 Fax: 909.477.2849 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Lynne B. Kennedy, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Sam Spagnolo, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director Page 215 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER 1 INTRODUCTION 3 Reason for Assessment 3 Process for Annual Assessment 3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 4 Description of the Boundaries of the District 4 Description of Improvements and Services 4 Map of Improvements 20 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 21 District Budget 22 Definitions of Budget Items 24 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 25 Overview 25 General Benefit 26 Special Benefit 26 Method of Assessment Spread 27 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM 28 ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS 30 Assessment Roll 30 Annexations 30 Page 216 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July 18, 2018 the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 18-053, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (General City) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed staff to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2018/19 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. Fiscal Year 2018/19 Budget Expenditures Personnel Services $ 31,120 Operations and Maintenance 1,346,900 Capital Expenditures 50,000 Transfer Out 90,000 Total Expenditures Budget 1,518,020 Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies 1,232,090 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 13,900 Subtotal - Taxes 1,245,990 Other Revenues 71,530 Transfer In 225,820 Total Revenues Budget 1,543,340 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ 25,320 Total District EBU Count 13,496.67 Actual Assessment per EBU $92.21 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU $ 92.21 Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#1 Page 217 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. 2. 1 have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, I certify that the Annual Engineer's Report and Assessment Diagram included herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#1 Page 218 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include, but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement or facility such as paseos, community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, and providing for the growth, vigor and care of the trees and landscape plant materials. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting of landscape or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the District for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the District by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the District. • Refers to the Engineer's Report, on file with the City Clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the City Clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#1 Page 219 conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including the improvements, to the zones within the District, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing, must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to, the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area of the City which is not located within the City's planned development communities. The District is made up of various landscaped sites throughout the City. As such, the parcels within the District do not represent a distinct district area as do the other landscape maintenance districts within the City. Typically parcels have been annexed to the District as they have developed. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements maintained by the District include the paseos, community trails, trees, landscaped sites and appurtenant facilities that are throughout the District. These improvements are located within the street right-of-ways and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, the pruning, fertilizing, mowing, weeding, pest control, removal of trash/debris, and irrigation of the trees, shrubs, vines, ground cover, and turf. Maintenance of associated improvements and facilities, such as community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, includes but is not limited to, grading and replacement of trail surfacing, trail fence repair and replacement, steel fence painting, repair and replacement, and irrigation systems control, adjustment, trouble -shooting, repair and Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#1 Page 220 replacement. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, capital projects and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Parks: Bear Gulch Park, East and West Beryl Park, Old Town Park, Church Street Park, Golden Oaks Park, Hermosa Park, and the undeveloped Don Tiburcio Tapia Park. Site # Descriptive Location A-1 The north and south side of Wilson Ave from Hellman Ave to Amethyst Ave. Ground Cover area: 22,982 square feet Hardscape area: 5,694 square feet A-2 The east side of Hellman Ave from 326 feet south of Pepperidge Ln to 73 feet north of Pepperidge Ln. Ground Cover area: 5,810 square feet Hardscape area: 1,600 square feet A-3 The south side of 19th St from 62 feet east of Mayberry Ave to 173 feet east of Mayberry Ave. Ground Cover area: 1,680 square feet Hardscape area: 440 square feet A-4 The south side of Wilson Ave from Amethyst Ave to Archibald Ave; the planters and cutouts on the west side of Archibald Ave from Wilson Ave to 105 feet south of Cottonwood Way. Ground Cover area: 5,625 square feet A-5 The north and south side of Diamond Ave from Klusman Ave to Diamond Ave. Ground Cover area: 3,143 square feet Hardscape area: 1,864 square feet A-6 The parkway on the north side of Wilson Ave from 348 feet east of Morning Canyon Way to Alder Ridge Pl. Ground Cover area: 5,700 square feet Hardscape area: 4,760 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#1 Page 221 A-7 The cutouts and vines on the south side of Wilson Ave from the Alta Loma Channel to 240 feet east of Zapata PI. Ground Cover area: 911 square feet A-8 The east side of Broken Star Ct from 80 feet south of Highland Ave to Highland Ave; the north side of Highland Ave from Amethyst Ave to Broken Star Ct including wood chip area north of sidewalk, the south side of Highland Ave from Broken Star Ct to Amethyst Ave; the west side of Amethyst Ave from 140 feet south of Highland Ave to 265 feet south of Highland Ave. Ground Cover area: 6,545 square feet Hardscape area: 2,554 square feet Mulchscape area: 14,005 square feet A-9 The south side of Highland Ave from Hellman Ave to Broken Star Ct. Ground Cover area: 7,865 square feet A-10 The south side of 19th St from 170 feet west of Pilgrim Ct to 167 feet east of Pilgrim Ct. Ground Cover area: 1,808 square feet Hardscape area: 1,084 square feet A-11 The east side of Amethyst Ave from Lemon Ave to 230 feet north of Apricot Ave. Ground Cover area: 2,115 square feet Hardscape area: 3,438 square feet A-12 The west side of Sapphire St from 710 feet north of Hillside Rd to Hillside Rd. Ground Cover area: 4,500 square feet A-13 The south side of Victoria St from 110 feet west of London Ave to Ramona Ave. Ground Cover area: 2,705 square feet Hardscape area: 3,480 square feet A-14 The west side of Archibald Ave from 273 feet north of La Gloria Dr to Lemon Ave; the La Gloria Dr median from Archibald Ave to Jadeite Ave; the north and south side of La Gloria Dr from Archibald Ave to 53 feet east of Jadeite Ave; the north side of Lemon Ave from Archibald Ave to 55 feet east of Klusman Ave. Ground Cover area: 12,880 square feet Hardscape area: 12,030 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#1 Page 222 A-15 The planters and cutouts on the east side of Archibald Ave from 610 feet south of Cottonwood Way to Wilson Ave; the south side of Wilson Ave from Archibald Ave to Alta Loma Channel. Ground Cover area: 2,110 square feet A-16 The cutouts and planters on the east side of Archibald Ave from Banyan St to 190 feet north of Sunflower St. Ground Cover area: 1,580 square feet A-17 The cutouts and planters on the west side of Archibald Ave from 225 feet south of Wilson Ave to Banyan St. Ground Cover area: 2,362 square feet A-18 The cutouts and planters on the north side of Banyan St from Jadeite Ave to 410 feet west of Jadeite Ave. Ground Cover area: 216 square feet A-19 The cutouts and planters on the east side of Amethyst Ave from 192 feet south of Sunflower St to Manzanita Dr. Ground Cover area: 4,325 square feet A-20 The west side of Archibald Ave from 210 feet north of La Colina Dr to 230 feet south of Almond St; the south side of La Colina Dr from Archibald Ave to Jadeite Ave. Ground Cover area: 17,120 square feet A-21 The planter adjacent to the equestrian trail from Riverwood PI to Raspberry PI north of the County flood retention basin that is west of Chaffey College. Ground Cover area: 22,832 square feet A-22 The west side of Haven Ave from Carrari St to Vista Grove St. Ground Cover area: 4,572 square feet A-23 The west side of Haven Ave from 434 feet north of Manzanita Dr to 258 feet south of Manzanita Dr. Ground Cover area: 54,250 square feet Hardscape area: 4,581 square feet A-24 The south side of 19th St from 286 feet east of Amethyst Ave to 166 feet west of Klusman Ave. Ground Cover area: 5,904 square feet Hardscape area: 2,938 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#1 Page 223 A-25 The equestrian trail and planters on the east side of Hermosa Ave from 421 feet south of Whispering Forest Dr to Sun Valley Dr. Ground Cover area: 17,529 square feet A-26 The west side of Haven Ave from 630 feet north of Wilson Ave to Wilson Ave; the parkway on the north side of Wilson Ave from Haven Ave to Mayberry Ave; the parkway on the east side of Mayberry Ave from Wilson Ave to 382 feet north of Poplar St, and the east and west side of Cartilla Ave from Wilson Ave to Poplar St. Ground Cover area: 10,243 square feet Mulchscape area: 25,297 square feet A-27 The north side of 19th St from Mayberry Ave to 93 feet east of Castle Gate PI. Ground Cover area: 5,145 square feet Hardscape area: 2,870 square feet A-28 The east side of Hermosa Ave from 360 feet south of Manzanita Dr to Manzanita Dr, and the south side of Manzanita Dr from Hermosa Ave to Raspberry PI. Ground Cover area: 7,421 square feet Hardscape area: 4,712 square feet A-29 The south side of Wilson Ave from 240 feet west of Timbermist PI to Hermosa Ave; the west side of Hermosa Ave from Wilson Ave to 213 feet south of Oakgrove Dr. Ground Cover area: 11,184 square feet A-30 Site was removed from contract and water service cancelled January 1, 2017. A-31 The south side of Lemon Ave from London Ave to Calle Hermoso. Ground Cover area: 4,404 square feet Hardscape area: 1,800 square feet A-32 The north side of Lemon Ave from the Alta Loma Channel to London Ave; the east side of London Ave from Lemon Ave to Cypress Ct. Ground Cover area: 4,463 square feet Hardscape area: 3,375 square feet A-33 The parkway on the east side of London Ave from 158 feet north of Banyan St to 310 feet north of Banyan St. Ground Cover area: 1,029 square feet Hardscape area: 1,160 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#1 Page 224 A-34 The south side of Alta Loma Dr from Mayberry Ave to Revere Ave. Ground Cover area: 2,772 square feet A-35 The west side of Hermosa Ave from Lemon Ave to 125 feet north of Highland Ave, the parkway on the south side of Lemon Ave from 621 feet west of Hermosa Ave to Hermosa Ave. Ground Cover area: 10,494 square feet Hardscape area: 9,207 square feet Mulchscape area: 2,370 square feet A-36 The south side of Lemon Ave from 385 feet west of Mayberry Ave to Cartilla Ave. Ground Cover area: 4,850 square feet Hardscape area: 4,915 square feet A-37 The south side of Hillside Rd north and south of the equestrian trail from Beryl St to 203 feet east of Eastwood Ave. Ground Cover area: 4,900 square feet A-38 The median in the 9200 block of Monte Vista St. Ground Cover area: 500 square feet Hardscape area: 1,380 square feet A-39 The south side of Almond St from Henry St to Sapphire St. The west side of Sapphire St from Almond St to 255 feet south of Bella Vista Dr. Ground Cover area: 6,926 square feet A-40 The parkway on the east side of Jasper St from Hunter Dr to Highland Ave. The parkway on the south side of Highland Ave from Jasper St to Carnelian St. The west side of Carnelian St from Highland Ave to 210 feet south of Highland Ave. Ground Cover area: 14,858 square feet Hardscape area: 6,040 square feet A-41 The west side of Sapphire St from 236 feet north of Thoroughbred St to Banyan St. Ground Cover area: 1,784 square feet Hardscape area: 812 square feet A-42 The parkway on the west side of Beryl St from 132 feet north of Sunflower St to Banyan St. Ground Cover area: 4,735 square feet Hardscape area: 5,772 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#1 Page 225 A-43 The north side of Base Line Rd from Topaz St to the Cucamonga Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 4,563 square feet Hardscape area: 1,890 square feet The cutouts on the west side of Sapphire St from Banyan St to Marble Ave. Ground Cover area: 7,300 square feet The mainline for this site was connected to A-46 on September 8, 1999. A-46 The south side of Banyan St from Northstar PI to Zircon Ave. Ground Cover area: 7,448 square feet Hardscape area: 7,890 square feet A-47 The cutouts and vines on the north side of Banyan St from 180 feet east of Zircon Ave to 186 feet west of Vineyard Ave. Ground Cover area: 1,300 square feet A-48 The parkway on the west side of Beryl St from 452 feet north of Cielito St; 158 feet south of Cielito St and the easement between 9063 and 9073 Cielito St from Cielito St to 170 feet south of Cielito St. Ground Cover area: 6,916 square feet Hardscape area: 2,440 square feet A-49 The east side of Carnelian St from 662 feet south of Banyan St to Banyan St; the south side of Banyan St from Carnelian St to Northstar PI. Ground Cover area: 5,906 square feet Hardscape area: 6,972 square feet A-50 The north side of Almond St from Sapphire St to Crestview PI; the east and west side of Skyline Rd from Almond St to 595 feet north of Almond St. Ground Cover area: 17,600 square feet Hardscape area: 8,680 square feet A-51 The planter adjacent to the equestrian trail; from Haven Ave to Riverwood PI, north of County flood retention basin, west of Chaffey College. The west side of Haven Ave from 400 feet north of Amber Ln to 270 feet south of Amber Ln, and the north and south side of Amber Ln from Haven Ave to San Felipe Ct. Ground Cover area: 37,977 square feet Hardscape area: 5,458 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#1 Page 226 A-52 The east side of Riverwood PI, from 188 feet south of Charwood Ct to 193 feet north of Charwood Ct. Ground Cover area: 2,750 square feet Hardscape area: 1,698 square feet A-53 The west side of Jasper St from Hunter Dr to Highland Ave. The south side of Highland from Jasper St to 308 feet west of Sard St. The east and west side of Sard St from Highland Ave to Hunter Dr. Ground Cover area: 7,445 square feet Hardscape area: 4,740 square feet A-54 The west side of Beryl St from 233 feet north of Mignonette St to Mignonette St. Ground Cover area: 2,637 square feet Hardscape area: 932 square feet A-55 The north side of 19th St from Cartilla Ave to Mayberry Ave. The east side of Mayberry Ave from 19th St to Heather St. Ground Cover area: 8,410 square feet Hardscape area: 5,060 square feet A-56 The east side of Beryl St from 410 feet north of Wilson Ave to Wilson Ave. The north side of Wilson Ave from Beryl St to 731 feet west of Buckthorn Ave. The south side of Wilson Ave from Buckthorn Ave to Beryl St. Ground Cover area: 19,708 square feet Hardscape area: 5,436 square feet A-57 The east side of Hermosa Ave from 115 feet north of Coca St to 451 feet north of Coca St. The trail north of water retention basin from Hermosa Ave to 619 feet east of Hermosa Ave. Ground Cover area: 9,406 square feet Hardscape area: 6,794 square feet A-58 The west side of Haven Ave from 510 feet south of Victoria St to 1005 feet south of Victoria St. Ground Cover area: 7,301 square feet Hardscape area: 4,790 square feet A-59 The east side of Archibald Ave from 820 feet south of Lemon Ave to 448 feet south of Lemon Ave and continues from 275 feet south of Lemon Ave to 185 south of Lemon Ave. Ground Cover area: 4,777 square feet Hardscape area: 5,041 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#1 Page 227 A-60 The south side of Lemon Ave from 290 feet east of Archibald Ave to London Ave. The west side of London Ave from Lemon Ave to Orange St. Ground Cover area: 2,569 square feet Hardscape area: 4,122 square feet A-61 The north side of Carrari St from London Ave to Archibald Ave. Ground Cover area: 25,152 square feet Hardscape area: 1,698 square feet A-62 The east side of Archibald Ave from Carrari St to 505 feet north of Meadowood Dr. Ground Cover area: 8,626 square feet Hardscape area: 1,824 square feet A-63 The south side of Almond St from Carriage Rd to Almond St. Ground Cover area: 3,342 square feet Hardscape area: 3,600 square feet A-64 The east side of Beryl St from Cottonwood Way to Wilson Ave. The south side of Wilson Ave from Beryl St to 437 feet east of Beryl St. The north side of Wilson Ave from Cousins PI to 474 feet east of Cousins PI. Ground Cover area: 11,973 square feet A-65 A-67 Hardscape area: 9,949 square feet The east side of Archibald Ave from La Gloria Dr to 328 feet north of La Gloria Dr. Ground Cover area: 2,279 square feet Hardscape area: 2,411 square feet The east side of Hermosa Ave from Waterford Ln to 500 feet north of Waterford Ln. Ground Cover area: 4,695 square feet Hardscape area: 5,947 square feet The south side of 19th St from 220 feet east of Sapphire St to Via Serena. Ground Cover area: 3,208 square feet Hardscape area: 4,158 square feet The west side of Haven Ave from Hillside Rd to 783 feet south of Hillside Rd. Ground Cover area: 3,492 square feet A-69 The north side of Hillside Rd from 27 feet west of Mayberry Ave to 191 feet west of Mayberry Ave. Ground Cover area: 1,002 square feet Hardscape area: 1,605 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#1 Page 228 A-70 The south side of 19th St from 365 feet west of Amethyst Ave to Amethyst Ave. The west side of Amethyst Ave from 19th to Hedges Dr. Ground Cover area: 6,435 square feet Hardscape area: 7,015 square feet A-71 The west side of Archibald Ave from Hillside Rd to Wilson Ave. The north side of Wilson Ave, south of the trail fence area from Archibald Ave to 467 feet west of Archibald Ave. Ground Cover area: 9,265 square feet Hardscape area: 2,609 square feet A-72 The south side of Banyan St from 420 feet west of Archibald Ave to Archibald Ave. The west side of Archibald Ave from Banyan St to 389 feet south of Banyan St. Ground Cover area: 10,270 square feet Hardscape area: 6,673 square feet A-73 The west side of Beryl St from 300 feet north of San Simeon Dr to 130 feet north of San Simeon Dr. Ground Cover area: 1,200 square feet Hardscape area: 600 square feet A-74 The south side of Highland Ave from Beryl St to Hellman Ave. Ground Cover area: 11,603 square feet A-75 The south side of Highland Ave from Amethyst Ave to 612 feet east of Archibald Ave. Ground Cover area: 106,409 square feet Hardscape area: 60,608 square feet A-76 The west side of Archibald Ave from 635 feet north of Hillside Rd to Hillside Rd. The north side of Hillside Rd from Archibald Ave to 770 feet west of Archibald Ave. Ground Cover area: 8,859 square feet Hardscape area: 1,389 square feet A-77 The east side of Carnelian St from Brilliant Ln to Wilson Ave including the irrigation cut- outs along trail. The south side of Wilson Ave from Carnelian St to 745 feet east of Arabian Dr. The irrigation cut-outs on the north side of Wilson Ave from Carnelian St to 775 feet east of Arabian Dr. Ground Cover area: 5,101 square feet Hardscape area: 11,322 square feet B-1 The median on Blue Gum Dr from Etiwanda Ave to Blue Gum Dr. Ground Cover area: 5,100 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#1 Page 229 B-2 The north side of Highland Ave from the Deer Creek Channel to San Benito Ave. The north side of 19th St from San Benito Ave to Palm Dr. The west and east side of Alameda Ave from 19th St to Ring Ave. The east side of Palm Dr from 19th St to Ring Ave. Ground Cover area: 47,397 square feet Hardscape area: 26,285 square feet B-3 The paseo from Sutter Ct to Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 294 square feet Hardscape area: 400 square feet B-4 The north side of Banyan St from Deer Creek Channel to 355 feet west of Fredericksburg Ave. Ground Cover area: 9,200 square feet Hardscape area: 3,834 square feet B-5 The north side of Lemon Ave from Semillion PI to 188 feet west of Terracina Ave. Ground Cover area: 14,472 square feet Hardscape area: 3,894 square feet B-6 The north side of Lemon Ave from Barsac PI to Semillion PI. Ground Cover area: 15,784 square feet Hardscape area: 3,780 square feet B-7 The south side of Banyan St from Cabernet PI to 414 feet east of Cabernet PI Ground Cover area: 18,814 square feet B-8 The south side of Banyan St from Callaway PI to Muscat PI. Ground Cover area: 10,505 square feet B-9 The east side of Haven Ave from Banyan St to 240 feet north of Banyan St. The north side of Banyan St from Haven Ave to Merlot Ct. Ground Cover area: 24,975 square feet Hardscape area: 1,356 square feet B-10 The east side of Haven Ave from 400 feet south of Banyan St to Banyan St. The south side of Banyan St from Haven Ave to Callaway PI. Ground Cover area: 14,548 square feet Hardscape area: 6,348 square feet B-11 The south side of Banyan St from Muscat PI to Cabernet PI. Ground Cover area: 33,282 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#1 Page 230 B-12 The north side of Lemon Ave from Barsac PI to 135 feet east of Valinda Ave. Ground Cover area: 13,464 square feet Hardscape area: 4,098 square feet B-13 The south side of 19th St from Inyo PI to 585 feet east of San Benito Ave. The parkways on the east and west side of San Benito Ave from 19th St to San Mateo PI. The east side of Inyo PI from 19th St to paseo south of 19th St and the paseo running east from Inyo PI to Sonora Ave. Ground Cover area: 20,950 square feet Hardscape area: 14,192 square feet MW B-15 The paseo from San Benito Ave and Sonora Ave to the Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 2,000 square feet Hardscape area: 540 square feet The paseo from Stanislaus PI and La Vine St to the Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 1,040 square feet Hardscape area: 428 square feet B-16 The paseo from Inyo PI to Mendocino PI. Ground Cover area: 225 square feet Hardscape area: 184 square feet B-17 The paseo from Yuba Ct to Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 918 square feet Hardscape area: 420 square feet B-18 The south side of Wilson Ave from 377 feet west of Canistel Ave to 1032 feet east of Canistel Ave. Ground Cover area: 6,762 square feet Hardscape area: 8,454 square feet B-19 The east side of Haven Ave from the Southern Pacific Railroad to 341 feet south of Victoria St. Ground Cover area: 6,415 square feet Hardscape area: 8,865 square feet B-20 The east side of Haven Ave from 341 feet south of Victoria St to Victoria St; the south side of Victoria St from Haven Ave to 237 feet east of Mango St. Ground Cover area: 16,900 square feet Hardscape area: 8,767 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#1 Page 231 B-21 The south side of 19th St from Valinda Ave to Inyo PI. Ground Cover area: 3,900 square feet Hardscape area: 3,700 square feet B-22 The south side of Lemon Ave south of the sidewalk from 188 feet west of Terracina Ave to 284 feet north of Marbella Dr. The parkway on the south side of Lemon Ave from 188 feet west of Terracina Ave to 517 feet north of Marbella Dr. The turf in the parkway at the end of the cul-de-sac on Sonterra Ct. The parkway on the north side of Lemon Ave from 188 feet west of Terracina Ave to 526 feet south of Terracina Ave. The north side of Lemon Ave north of the sidewalk from 188 feet west of Terracina Ave to 562 feet south of Terracina Ave. The turf in the parkway at the end of the cul-de-sac at Serena PI. Ground Cover area: 17,688 square feet Turf area: 6,390 square feet Hardscape area: 4,928 square feet B-23 The parkway on the east side of Lemon Ave from 129 feet south of Marbella Dr to 526 feet south of Terracina Ave. The slope on the east side of Lemon Ave east of the sidewalk from 129 feet south of Marbella Dr to 562 feet south of Terracina Ave. The west side of Lemon Ave west of the sidewalk from 284 feet north of Marbella Dr to 129 feet south of Marbella Dr. The parkway on the west side of Lemon Ave from 517 feet north of Marbella Dr to 129 feet south of Marbella Dr. Ground Cover area: 22,531 square feet Hardscape area: 4,468 square feet B-24 The south side of Highland Ave from 327 feet west of Deer Creek Channel to Deer Creek Channel. The paseo from Los Osos Way to Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 4,946 square feet Hardscape area: 2,099 square feet B-25 The south side of Banyan St from 152 feet west of Cantabria Ave to 930 feet east of Cantabria Ave. Ground Cover area: 16,693 square feet B-26 The north side of Wilson Ave from 590 feet west of High Meadow PI to 187 feet east of High Meadow PI. Ground Cover area: 4,628 square feet Hardscape area: 390 square feet B-27 The east side of Haven Ave from 467 feet north of 19th St to 650 feet north of 19th St. Ground Cover area: 3,483 square feet Hardscape area: 6,235 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 16 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#1 Page 232 C-1 The north side of 26th St from Andover PI to Hermosa Ave. The east side of Hermosa Ave from 26th St to 331 feet north of Concord Dr. Ground Cover area: 22,227 square feet Hardscape area: 5,532 square feet C-2 The entry monument on the northeast and northwest corners of 4th St and Archibald Ave. Ground Cover area: 6,337 square feet Hardscape area: 3,998 square feet C-3 C-4 The south side of Base Line Rd from Ramona Ave to 128 feet east of Cambridge Ave. Ground Cover area: 17,262 square feet Hardscape area: 4,865 square feet The south side of Base Line Rd from 440 feet west of Ramona Ave to Ramona Ave. Ground Cover area: 6,198 square feet Hardscape area: 2,200 square feet C-5 The south side of Base Line Rd from 340 feet west of Center Ave to 103 feet east of Center Ave. Ground Cover area: 8,850 square feet Hardscape area: 2,215 square feet C-6 The south side of Base Line Rd from Ivy Ln to 105 feet west of Marine Ave. Ground Cover area: 8,080 square feet Hardscape area: 2,475 square feet C-7 The parkway on the north side of Church St from 142 feet east of Teak Way to 230 feet west of Teak Way. Ground Cover area: 1,813 square feet Hardscape area: 1,650 square feet C-8 The west side of Hermosa Ave from 524 feet north of Palo Alto St to 142 feet south of Palo Alto St. Ground Cover area: 2,650 square feet Hardscape area: 3,996 square feet C-9 The parkway on the west side of Hermosa Ave from 163 feet north of Ironwood St to 145 feet south of Ironwood St. Ground Cover area: 1,500 square feet Hardscape area: 1,848 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 17 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#1 Page 233 C-10 The entry monument parkway on the south side of Base Line Rd from the western city limit to Alta Cuesta Dr. Ground Cover area: 9,756 square feet Hardscape area: 4,380 square feet C-11 The parkway on the east side of Beryl St from Alder St to 135 feet north of Culpepper St. Ground Cover area: 3,400 square feet Hardscape area: 3,600 square feet C-12 The parkway on the east side of Hellman Ave from Tryon St to 665 feet north of Tryon St. Ground Cover area: 8,280 square feet Hardscape area: 3,325 square feet C-13 The parkway on the west side of Hellman Ave from 500 feet north of Church St to Church St. Ground Cover area: 2,416 square feet Hardscape area: 3,000 square feet C-14 The east side of Archibald Ave from 196 feet north of Palo Alto St to 530 feet north of Palo Alto St. Ground Cover area: 4,262 square feet Hardscape area: 1,374 square feet C-15 The north side of San Bernardino Rd from Summerlin PI to 225 feet west of Summerlin PI. Ground Cover area: 1,660 square feet Hardscape area: 710 square feet C-16 The south side of Base Line Rd from 286 feet west of Hermosa Ave to Hermosa Ave. The raised planter on the southwest corner of Base Line Rd and Hermosa Ave. Ground Cover area: 4,190 square feet Hardscape area: 2,320 square feet C-17 The east side of Hellman Ave from 775 feet south of 6th St to 6th St. The south side of 6th St from Hellman Ave to Golden Oak Rd. The west side of Golden Oak Rd from 6th St to Foxbrook Dr. Ground Cover area: 9,058 square feet Hardscape area: 6,387 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 18 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#1 Page 234 D-1 D-2 D-3 The east side of Rochester Ave from Church St to Base Line Rd. Ground Cover area: 27,920 square feet Hardscape area: 17,301 square feet The east side of Rochester Ave from 146 feet south of Chervil St to Church St. Ground Cover area: 21,858 square feet Hardscape area: 13,263 square feet The south side of Base Line Rd from Rochester Ave to 600 feet east of Rochester Ave. Ground Cover area: 2,180 square feet Hardscape area: 4,121 square feet D-4 The north and south sides of Church St from Rochester Ave to 150 feet east of Hyssop Dr. Ground Cover area: 6,340 square feet Hardscape area: 8,887 square feet H-9 The Haven Ave median from the 210 freeway to Alta Loma Dr. Ground Cover area: 2,207 square feet H-10 The Haven Ave median from entrance of Haven Village to Amber Ln. Ground Cover area: 6,968 square feet Converted 5,131 square feet of turf to ground cover effective April 1, 2013. Area listed is the 50% maintained by LMD 1. An equal amount is maintained by General Fund as of March 25, 2013 H-11 The Haven Ave median from Amber Ln to Olive Way. Ground Cover area: 5,026 square feet Converted 3,475 square feet of turf to ground cover effective April 1, 2013. Area listed is the 50% maintained by LMD 1. An equal amount is maintained by General Fund as of March 25, 2013 H-12 The Haven Ave median from Olive Way to 712 feet north of Wilson Ave. Ground Cover area: 6,734 square feet Converted 3,933 square feet of turf to ground cover effective April 1, 2013. Area listed is the 50% maintained by LMD 1. An equal amount is maintained by General Fund as of March 25, 2013 H-13 The Haven Ave median from 19th St to the 210 freeway. Ground Cover area: 12,514 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 19 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#1 Page 235 FH -18 The Foothill Blvd median from East Ave to 453 feet east of Cornwall Ct. Ground Cover area: 5,450 square feet Parks, ground cover, shrubs and turf areas that make up parkways, median islands and paseos are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company. Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 20 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#1 Page 236 �Y�s =_p x9aTxs9 D Grow Av . s s��Ej x 4 e s Vineyard Av 3 S .N. w Hellman Av--�'� ' V Archibald Av �N Hermosa Av i Haven Av —} — ! Milliken Av i — Rochester Av I Etiwanda Av i m � i 1 D » Carnelian Sl Ir • o. D � x N = 7' �p�D� D TJ,jw I Y/ A n .E Hellman Ave • L is! iW Do3 ------ 0 0 A f A = D T A a Cherry Av 00 Archibald Av W T H { - D Hermosa Av 3 I `> > Haven Av �. CD w CD v W I 0 lm Milliken Av I n 1 � Day Crr. ek BI i 1 1 O 1 Etiwanda Av 1 Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2018/19 East Av 1 1 1 r i i t 1� io l a 21 ATTACHMENT#1 Page 237 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the District levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Expenditures Personnel Services: Regular Salaries Part-time Salaries Fringe Benefits Subtotal - Personnel Fiscal Year 2018/19 Budget $ 17,090 5,000 9,030 31,120 Operations and Maintenance: Operations and Maintenance: O & M/General 80,100 O & M/Facilities 2,300 Vehicle Operations and Maintenance 2,000 Emergency Equipment and Vehicle Rental 2,800 Equipment Operations and Maintenance 2,000 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 89,200 Contract Services: Contract Services/General 666,320 Contract Services/Facilities 7,600 Tree Maintenance 52,500 Subtotal - Contract Services 726,420 Utilities: Telephone Utilities 2,790 Water Utilities 342,760 Electric Utilities 82,470 Subtotal - Utilities 428,020 Assessment Administration 56,230 Adm in./General Overhead 46,370 Other Expenses 660 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 1,346,900 Capital Expenditures: Captial Outlay - Improvements Other Than Building 50,000 Transfer Out: Transfer Out - LMD #1 Capital Reserve Fund 90,000 Total Expenditures Budget $ 1,518,020 Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 22 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#1 Page 238 Fiscal Year 2018/19 Budget Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies $ 1,232,090 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 13,900 Subtotal - Taxes 1,245,990 Other Revenues: Interest Earnings Other Rental/Lease Income Park Maintenance Fees Sports Field User Group Rentals Sports Lighting Fees Other Revenue Subtotal - Other Revenues: Transfer In: Transfer In - General Fund Transfer In - LIVID #1 Operating Fund Subtotal - Transfer In: 18,780 24,910 4,450 1,000 22,290 100 71,530 135,820 90,000 225,820 Total Revenues Budget $ 1,543,340 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ 25,320 Total Gross Estimated Assessments $ 1,244,579.35 Total District EBU Count 13,496.67 Actual Assessment per EBU - Fiscal Year 2018/19 $92.21 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU - Fiscal Year 2018/19 $ 92.21 The maximum allowable assessment per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however, it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. Beginning with Fiscal Year 2016/17 the City will maintain a Capital Reserve Fund to be used for deferred maintenance and pending capital projects. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 23 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#1 Page 239 Operating Capital Total Reserve Reserve Reserve Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2018 $1,240,227 $136,337 $1,376,564 Contribution to Reserve - Fiscal Year 2018/19 (26,170) 51,490 25,320 Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2019 $1,214,057 $187,827 $1,401,884 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time and part-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Additionally, this includes benefits available to City employees. Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District. Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Utilities: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity, water, and telephone services, as required, for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers in the District. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost of all particular departments and staff of the City, as well as consultants, for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual Engineer's Report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all central services departments of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational District within the City's administrative structure. Capital Outlay: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 24 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#1 Page 240 Other Revenues: This includes other revenues that are not levied through the annual assessments that support the District operations. These other revenues may include: interest earnings, other rental/lease income (cell site tower leases), Park Maintenance Fees, Sports Field User Group Rentals, and parking permits (Metrolink Station paid parking). METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Overview Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 commencing with Section 5000) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]. Section 22547 of the 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement." Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights -of -ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 25 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#1 Page 241 the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. General Benefit Section 4 of Article XIII D of the California Constitution provides that once a local agency which proposes to impose assessments on property has identified those parcels that will have special benefits conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed, the local agency must next "separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred," and only the special benefits can be included in the amount of the assessments imposed. In this District, the improvements being financed consists of the maintenance of local improvements located within the boundaries of the District and include paseos, street trees, landscaped areas, Parks - Bear Gulch Park, East and West Beryl Park, Old Town Park, Church Street Park, Golden Oaks Park, Hermosa Park, and the undeveloped Don Tiburcio Tapia Park and appurtenant facilities that are located throughout the General City and were installed to create a common landscape theme and neighborhood identity for parcels within the District. The improvements are situated within the public rights-of-way of the internal local street network within the General City which provides ingress and egress for parcels within the District to access the City's system of arterial streets. City residents and traffic from parcels not within the District do not use the internal local street network or paseos except for the express purpose of accessing properties located within the District, and therefore do not benefit from the improvements. Only parcels which are within the District and proximate to the improvements and within the District are being assessed. Accordingly, there is a direct physical and visual nexus between each parcel being assessed and the improvements to be funded by the assessment that does not exist for parcels outside of the District boundary and that is particular and distinct from that shared by the public at large. Under these circumstances, all of the benefits conferred are direct and local in nature, and provide a benefit to only those parcels located within the boundaries of the District. Based upon this, it has been determined that there is no quantifiable general benefit to the surrounding community and the public in general from the maintenance of the improvements within the boundaries of the District, and therefore no portion of the project costs should be attributed to general benefit. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District and, as such, confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 26 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#1 Page 242 • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District, only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements is identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined; however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since Fiscal Year 1996/97. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The EBU method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one EBU. Every other land -use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land -use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land -use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 27 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#1 Page 243 Land -Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Property Type (County Use Code) EBU Value Multiplier Single Family Residential 1.00 Parcel Multi -Family Residential 0.50 Unit Non -Residential 1.00 Acre The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2018/19 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the San Bernardino County Assessor Office, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 28 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#1 Page 244 Maximum Allowable Actual Assessment Assessment Total Parcel Land Use Category Rate per EBU Rate per EBU Units/Acres Total EBUs Single Family Residential $92.21 $92.21 8,338.00 8,338.00 Multi -Family Residential 92.21 92.21 10,282.00 5,141.00 Non -Residential 92.21 92.21 8.83 17.67 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the San Bernardino County Assessor Office, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 28 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#1 Page 244 t -;T ;z o m _ Grove AV LID(� � Carnelian St Vineyrnard AV A � Hellman AV F Hellman AV Archibald AV Archibald AV Hermosa AV Hermosa AV Haven AV Haven AV Milliken AV Milliken AV li.�.�..�..�..�..i t.✓ Rochester AV 1 Rochester AV Day Creek BI � r Etiwanda AV Etiwanda AV! A � y East AV= i D 0 0 CO v m l ai Cherry AV i M r o C7 z (D ® C) p N ry, m Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 29 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#1 Page 245 ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2018/19 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2018/19 actual assessments for the District: Property Type (County Use Code) Actual Assessment Rate Per EBU Total Units/ Acres Total EBUs Total Assessment Single Family Residential $92.21 8,338.00 8,338.00 $768,846.98 Multi -Family Residential 92.21 10,282.00 5,141.00 474,103.02 Non -Residential 92.21 8.83 17.67 1,629.35 Total 60.00 1 18,628.83 13,496.67 $1,244,579.35 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations The following annexations are effective for Fiscal Year 2018/19: APN Annexation Date Project Name Total Units/Acres Total EBUS Property Type 0208-131-85 & 86 02/01/17 PM 17663 2.00 2.00 SFD 0201-182-36 to 38 08/02/17 TR 18391 6.00 6.00 SFD 0208-031-58 & 59 09/06/17 DRC2014-00545 60.00 30.00 MULTI Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 30 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#1 Page 246 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2018/19 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (Victoria Neighborhood Parks) Page 247 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (Victoria Neighborhood Parks) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2700 Fax: 909.477.2849 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Lynne B. Kennedy, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Sam Spagnolo, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director Page 248 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER 1 INTRODUCTION 3 Reason for Assessment 3 Process for Annual Assessment 3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 4 Description of the Boundaries of the District 4 Description of Improvements and Services 4 Map of Improvements 21 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 23 District Budget 23 Definitions of Budget Items 25 BENEFITS FROM IMPROVEMENTS AND QUANTIFICATION 26 Benefits from Improvements 26 Quantification of Benefit 28 Sidewalks and Community Trails 29 Street Landscaping 31 Neighborhood Parks 36 Collective General Benefit 38 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 38 Overview 38 Apportioning of Special Benefit 39 Rate per Benefit Unit 46 Method of Assessment Spread 46 Applying the Method of Assessment Spread 46 Page 249 Proposed Maximum Assessment Rates Cost of Living Inflator ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS Assessment Roll Annexations 49 49 50 52 52 52 Page 250 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July 18, 2018 the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 18-053, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (Victoria Neighborhood Parks) (hereafter, referred to as the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed staff to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2018/19 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. Expenditures Personnel Services Operations and Maintenance Capital Expenditures Total Expenditures Budget Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection Subtotal - Taxes Other Revenues Transfer In Total Revenues Budget Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance Total District EBU Count Actual Assessment per EBU Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2018/19 Fiscal Year 2018/19 Budget $ 909,240 2,877,050 116,000 3,902,290 3,496,470 34,730 3,531,200 48,380 299,540 3,879,120 $ (23,170) 77,113.24 $ 45.80 $ 45.80 1 ATTACHMENT#2 Page 251 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. 2. 1 have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, I certify that the Annual Engineer's Report and Assessment Diagram included herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#2 Page 252 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement or facility such as paseos, community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, and providing for the growth, vigor and care of the trees and landscape plant materials. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting of landscape or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the District for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the District by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the District. • Refers to the Engineer's Report, on file with the City Clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the City Clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#2 Page 253 hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including the improvements, to the zones within the District, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area located south of the 210 Freeway, west of Etiwanda Ave, southwest of the 1-15 Freeway, and east of Haven Ave, also known as the Victoria Neighborhood Parks and Landscape Maintenance District, and are more particularly in the diagram of the District included herein. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements located in and serviced and maintained by the District generally include: the landscaping and associated landscape lighting and irrigation systems installed along the roadways, medians, and community trails; sidewalks; and six neighborhood parks that are of direct and special benefit to the parcels within the District. These improvements are located within the public right-of-ways and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, pruning, fertilizing, mowing, weeding, pest control, removal of trash/debris/graffiti, and irrigation of the trees, shrubs, vines, ground cover, and turf. Maintenance of associated improvements, including the Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#2 Page 254 parks and irrigation systems, includes but is not limited to, the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of the improvement or facility; grading and replacement of trail surfacing; trail fence repair and replacement; and irrigation systems control, adjustment, repair and replacement. Servicing means the furnishing of water for the irrigation of landscaping, the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting of landscaping or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include materials, vehicles, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Parks: Ellena Park, Kenyon Park, Victoria Arbors Park, Victoria Groves Park, Vintage Park, and Windrows Park Site # Descriptive Location 2-1 The west side of Arbor Ln from the traffic circle to Church St. The Arbor Ln median from Church St to the traffic circle. The east side of Arbor Ln from Long Meadow Dr to Church St. The paseo from the west side of Arbor Ln to Day Creek Blvd. The paseo from the west side of Arbor Ln to Saintsbury PI. The north side of Winery Dr from Arbor Ln to 214 feet west of Arbor Ln. The south side of Long Meadow Dr from Freestone Ct to Duck Creek PI. Ground Cover area: 93,639 square feet Hardscape area: 59,041 square feet 2-2 The northwest corner of Day Creek Blvd and Church St. The north side of Church St from Day Creek Blvd to 1,152 feet west of Hess PI. The paseo from the north side of Church St to Dry Creek Dr. The paseo from the north side of Church St to Pineridge PI. The west side of Hess PI from the north side of Church St to Dry Creek Dr. The south side of Church St from 145 feet east of Hyssop Dr to 896 feet east of Hyssop Dr. Ground Cover area: 24,018 square feet Hardscape area: 26,617 square feet 2-3 The west side of Day Creek Blvd from 250 feet north of Appellation Dr to Church St. The east side of Day Creek Blvd from Church St to Madrigal PI. The Day Creek Blvd median from Church St to Base Line Rd. The south side of Madrigal PI from Day Creek Blvd to Round Hill PI. Ground Cover area: 35,420 square feet Hardscape area: 42,671 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#2 Page 255 2-4 Victoria Park Ln from Base Line Rd to the east entrance of Victoria Arbor Park. The southwest corner of Victoria Park Ln and Base Line Rd. The southeast corner of Victoria Park Ln to 445 feet east of Victoria Park Ln. Ground Cover area: 36,482 square feet Turf area: 3,874 square feet Hardscape area: 32,927 square feet 2-5 The east and west side of Victoria Park Ln and the medians from Mosaic Dr to Church St. Ground Cover area: 56,358 square feet Hardscape area: 20,390 square feet 2-6 The north side of Church St from Arbor Ln to Day Creek Blvd. The northwest corner of Church St and Arbor Ln. The paseo from the north side of Church St to Wilson Creek Dr. Ground Cover area: 21,616 square feet Hardscape area: 15,159 square feet 2-7 The north side of Church St from Victoria Park Ln to Arbor Ln. The northwest corner of Victoria Park Ln and Church St. The paseo from the north side of Church St to Elk Cove Ct. The paseo from the north side of Church St to Freestone Ct. The northeast corner of Arbor Ln and Church St. Ground Cover area: 16,609 square feet Hardscape area: 13,730 square feet 2-8 The paseo from the west side of Etiwanda Ave to Silver Rose Ct. The north side of Church St from Etiwanda Ave to Victoria Park Ln. The east side of Iron Horse PI from Church St to Wild Horse PI. The paseo from the north side of Church St to Cloudy Bay Ct. The medians from Iron Horse PI to Etiwanda Ave. Ground Cover area: 35,122 square feet Hardscape area: 28,473 square feet 2-9 The landscaped slope behind existing landscape of site 2-5 on the west side of Victoria Park Ln from 475 feet north of Long Meadow Dr to Long Meadow Dr. The landscape slope and curb adjacent parkway from Victoria Park Ln to 685 feet west of Victoria Park Ln. Ground Cover area: 26,213 square feet Hardscape area: 5,617 square feet VW -1 Base Line Rd median from Victoria Park Ln to 830 feet west of Victoria Park Ln. Ground Cover area: 4,514 square feet Hardscape area: 3,474 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#2 Page 256 VW -2 The north side of Base Line Rd 300 feet east and 200 feet west of Swanson PI. The east and west sides of Swanson PI from Base Line Rd to Province St. The paseo from the intersection of Swanson PI and Province St to Atwood St with outlet to Dunmore PI. The paseo from Atwood St to the Southern Pacific Railroad. The north side of Saratoga St from Powell PI to Dunmore PI. The paseo from Saratoga St to Etiwanda Ave. The south side of Atwood St from Victoria Park Ln to Travis PI. The north side of Atwood St from Walcott PI to Victoria Park Ln. Ground Cover area: 18,753 square feet Turf area: 73,931 square feet Hardscape area: 22,615 square feet VW -3 The Victoria Park Ln median and the west and east side parkways from Base Line Rd to the entrance to Victoria Village. Ground Cover area: 27,090 square feet Hardscape area: 3,214 square feet VW -4 The Victoria Park Ln median and the west and east side parkways from Victoria Village entrance to Atwood St. Ground Cover area: 40,937 square feet Hardscape area: 6,428 square feet VW -5 The Victoria Park Ln median and the west side and east side parkways from Atwood St to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground Cover area: 49,513 square feet Hardscape area: 5,467 square feet VW -6 The paseo running north from 12732 Farrington St to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground Cover area: 285 square feet Hardscape area: 679 square feet VW -7 The paseo running north from 12840 Farrington St to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground Cover area: 266 square feet Hardscape area: 552 square feet VW -8 The Victoria Park Ln median and the west side parkway from the Southern Pacific Railroad to South Victoria Windrows Loop. The Victoria Park Ln east side parkway from the Southern Pacific Railroad to Zinnia Ct. Ground Cover area: 40,548 square feet Hardscape area: 6,150 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#2 Page 257 VW -9 The Victoria Park Ln east side parkway from Barberry St to North Victoria Windrows Loop at Windrows Park. Ground Cover area: 40,004 square feet Turf area: 11,779 square feet Hardscape area: 3,720 square feet VW -10 The west side of Victoria Park Ln from South Victoria Windrows Loop to Dahlia Ct. The Victoria Park Ln median from Zinnia Ct to Dahlia Ct. The east side of Victoria Park Ln from North Victoria Windrows Loop at Windrows Park to Dahlia Ct. Ground Cover area: 50,620 square feet Turf area: 11,878 square feet Hardscape area: 11,400 square feet VW -11 The east side parkway on South Victoria Windrows Loop from Silktassel Dr to Victoria Park Ln. The parkway on the south side of Victoria Park Ln from the intersection of South Victoria Windrows Loop and North Victoria Windrows Loop to Dahlia Ct. The Victoria Park Ln median from the intersection of North and South Victoria Windrows Loop to Dahlia Ct. The parkway on the north side of Victoria Windrows Loop from the intersection of North and South Victoria Windrows Loop to Dahlia Ct. Ground Cover area: 27,053 square feet Turf area: 20,216 square feet Hardscape area: 6,988 square feet VW -12 The Victoria Park Ln median from the intersection of North and South Victoria Windrows Loop to 390 feet east of Day Creek Blvd. The parkway on the north side of Victoria Park Ln from the intersection of North and South Victoria Windrows Loop to 390 feet east of Day Creek Blvd. The parkway on the west side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Silverberry St to Victoria Park Ln. The parkway on the south side of Silverberry St from 390 feet east of Day Creek Blvd to North Victoria Windrows Loop. Ground Cover area: 166,249 square feet Turf area: 21,603 square feet Hardscape area: 12,868 square feet VW -13 The parkway on the south side of Victoria Park Ln from 390 feet east of Day Creek Blvd to South Victoria Windrows Loop. The west side of South Victoria Windrows Loop from Victoria Park Ln to Snapdragon St. Ground Cover area: 20,068 square feet Turf area: 16,476 square feet Hardscape area: 7,200 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#2 Page 258 VW -14 The parkway on the west side of South Victoria Windrows Loop from Snapdragon St to Victoria Park Ln. The parkway on the north and south side of Sugar Gum St from South Victoria Windrows Loop to 390 feet east of Day Creek Blvd. The parkways on the east and west sides of Basswood PI from Sugar Gum St to Blazing Star Ct. The parkway on the north side of South Victoria Windrows Loop from Victoria Park Ln to Silktassel Dr. Ground Cover area: 21,466 square feet Turf area: 10,335 square feet Hardscape area: 27,560 square feet VW -15 The parkway on the north side of Bougainvillea Way from Peach PI to North Victoria Windrows Loop. The parkway on the east side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Bougainvillea Way to Citrus PI. The parkway on the north side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Locus Ave and following that curb line to Silverberry St. The parkway on the north side of Silverberry St from North Victoria Windrows Loop 390 feet east of Day Creek Blvd. The paseo from North Victoria Windrows Loop at Silverberry St to Nasturtium Dr. The paseo from North Victoria Windrows Loop at Locus Ave to Pistache St and continuing to Bougainvillea Way. Ground Cover area: 45,929 square feet Turf area: 12,207 square feet Hardscape area: 23,630 square feet VW -16 The south side of Highland Ave from 455 feet east of Day Creek Blvd to 534 feet east of Locus Ave. The east and west side of Locus Ave from Highland Ave to North Victoria Windrows Loop. The parkway on the south side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Citrus PI east to Bougainvillea Way. The parkway on the north side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Twinspur PI to Locus Ave. Ground Cover area: 26,577 square feet Turf area: 23,922 square feet Hardscape area: 19,203 square feet VW -17 This site was modified and added to VW -16 on January 5, 1999. VW -18 The south side of Highland Ave from 12583 Highland Ave to Rockrose Ave. Ground Cover area: 2,800 square feet Turf area: 8,515 square feet Hardscape area: 3,325 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#2 Page 259 VW -19 The north side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Rosemary Ct to Rockrose Ave. The east side of Rockrose Ave from North Victoria Windrows Loop to Highland Ave. The south side of Highland Ave from Rockrose Ave to Etiwanda Ave. The horse trail from Highland Ave and Etiwanda Ave to the Fire Station. Ground Cover area: 21,027 square feet Turf area: 32,266 square feet Hardscape area: 11,298 square feet VW -20 The parkway on the south side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Victoria Park Ln to Plum Way. The parkway on the west side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Plum Way to Rosemary Ct. The paseo from Tipu PI east to the open field. Note: The area in front of Windrows Park is watered by the VW -20 water meter, but it is maintained by City crews. Ground Cover area: 2,110 square feet Turf area: 16,411 square feet Hardscape area: 9,132 square feet VW -21 The east side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Rosemary Ct to the trail south of Kalmia St. The trail and paseo from North Victoria Windrows Loop south of Kalmia St to Etiwanda Ave and north to the Fire Station. The south side of Basil St from North Victoria Windrows Loop to Santolina PI. Ground Cover area: 49,187 square feet Turf area: 57,532 square feet Hardscape area: 19,600 square feet VW -22 The paseo from North Victoria Windrows Loop at Rockrose Ave to the northeast corner of Windrows Park and from that corner to Plum Way. Ground Cover area: 13,689 square feet Turf area: 19,953 square feet Hardscape area: 9,489 square feet VW -23 The west side of Rockrose Ave from Highland Ave to North Victoria Windrows Loop. The parkway on the north side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Rockrose Ave to Twinspur PI. The parkway on the south side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Bougainvillea Way to Rosemary Ct. Ground Cover area: 18,299 square feet Turf area: 3,452 square feet Hardscape area: 10,352 square feet VW -24 The Metropolitan Water District easement from Jasmine Ct and Ironbark Dr to Sweetgum Dr. Ground Cover area: 475 square feet Hardscape area: 4,730 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#2 Page 260 VW -25 The north side of Base Line Rd from 384 feet west of Wanona PI to Etiwanda Ave. The west side of Etiwanda Ave from Base Line Rd to Craig Dr. The Base Line Rd median from Swanson PI to Etiwanda Ave. Ground Cover area: 20,934 square feet Turf area: 3,079 square feet Hardscape area: 12,799 square feet VW -26 The paseo from Grape PI to 630 feet west of Grape PI Ground Cover area: 7,021 square feet Hardscape area: 8,548 square feet VW -27 The south side of Base Line Rd from 251 feet west of Swanson PI to Etiwanda Ave. The Base Line Rd median from Victoria Park Ln to Swanson PI. Ground Cover area: 18,816 square feet Hardscape area: 17,233 square feet VG -1 The turf and ground cover on the south side of Highland Ave from the Deer Creek Channel to Fairmont Way. The turf and ground cover from Highland Ave on the west side of Fairmont Way to Victoria Park Ln. The ground cover on the north side of Victoria Park Ln south of the horse trail from 475 feet east of Milliken Ave to Fairmont Way. The turf on the north side of Victoria Park Ln from 275 feet east of Milliken Ave to Fairmont Way. The turf in the parkway on the east side of Fairmont Way from Victoria Park Ln to Highland Ave. Ground Cover area: 21,573 square feet Turf area: 47,604 square feet Hardscape area: 17,300 square feet VG -2 The turf on the east side of York PI from Delaware St to Fairmont Way. The ground cover on the south side of Fairmont Way from York PI and continuing on that curb line to Victoria Park Ln. The turf and ground cover on the south side of Victoria Park Ln west of Milliken Ave from Fairmont Way to Milliken Ave. The parkway on the west side of Milliken Ave from Victoria Park Ln to Fairmont Way. The Milliken Ave median from Fairmont Way to Victoria Park Ln. The turf on the north side of Victoria Park Ln from 273 feet west of Milliken Ave to Milliken Ave. The ground cover on the north side of Victoria Park Ln south of the horse trail from 468 feet west of Milliken Ave to Milliken Ave. Ground Cover area: 53,416 square feet Turf area: 49,587 square feet Hardscape area: 20,173 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#2 Page 261 VG -3 The turf and ground cover north of the sidewalk on the north side of Fairmont Way from Nova Ct continuing on that curb line to York PI and the turf south of the sidewalk on the north side of Fairmont Way from Armstrong PI continuing on that curb line to York PI. The ground cover on the west side of York PI from Fairmont Way to Delaware St and the ground cover on the east side of York PI. The turf and ground cover on the west side of Fairmont Way from Emerson St continuing along that curb line to Armstrong PI. The turf and ground cover on the east and west sides of Biola PI. Ground Cover area: 57,189 square feet Turf area: 38,343 square feet Hardscape area: 26,848 square feet VG -4 The turf and ground cover on the south side of Fairmont Way from Armstrong PI to Milliken Ave. The turf and ground cover on the west side of Milliken Ave from Fairmont Way to the Southern Pacific Railroad. The Milliken Ave median from Fairmont Way to the Southern Pacific Railroad. The ground cover on the north side of the Southern Pacific Railroad from Deer Creek Channel to Rochester Ave including the paseo to Baylor St. The ground cover on the north side of Fairmont Way from Milliken Ave to Nova Ct. The turf on the north side of Fairmont Way from Milliken Ave to Armstrong PI. Ground Cover area: 202,163 square feet Turf area: 19,751 square feet Hardscape area: 12,278 square feet VG -5 The paseo from Biola PI to Amarillo St to Delaware St at York PI Ground Cover area: 12,448 square feet Turf area: 44,896 square feet Hardscape area: 7,992 square feet VG -6 The paseo beginning at the northeast corner of Victoria Groves Park and Fairmont Way and extending to the Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 73,442 square feet Turf area: 74,778 square feet Hardscape area: 16,629 square feet VG -7 The paseo that begins on the south side of Donnelly St at Fairmont Way and continues to the Deer Creek Channel including the southward extension on the west side of Albright PI from Donnelly St to Pacific and the paseo from Pacific to Charleston St. Ground Cover area: 43,427 square feet Turf area: 51,765 square feet Hardscape area: 15,806 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#2 Page 262 VG -8 The ground cover on the west side of Milliken Ave from 566 feet north of Victoria Park Ln to Victoria Park Ln. The ground cover and turf north of the horse trail on Victoria Park Ln from Milliken Ave to Fairmont Way. The ground cover on the east side of Fairmont Way from Victoria Park Ln to 156 feet north of Victoria Park Ln. Ground Cover area: 21,614 square feet Turf area: 8,614 square feet Hardscape area: 8,281 square feet VG -9 The ground cover on the east side of Fairmont Way from 156 feet north of Victoria Park Ln to Kenyon Way. The ground cover on the south side of Kenyon Way from Fairmont Way to 197 feet east of Fairmont Way. The turf on the south side of Kenyon Way from Fairmont Way to 316 feet east of Fairmont Way. The turf and ground cover on the south side of Baltimore Dr from Fairmont Way to Baltimore Ct. The turf and ground cover on the north side of Baltimore Dr from Fairmont Way to Vanderbilt PI. The turf and ground cover on the east side of Vanderbilt PI from Baltimore Dr to Brown Dr. The paseo from Vanderbilt PI and Brown Dr to Kenyon Way. Ground Cover area: 48,481 square feet Turf area: 11,357 square feet Hardscape area: 13,542 square feet VG -10 The ground cover on the south side of Kenyon Way from 197 feet east of Fairmont Way to Milliken Ave. The turf on the south side of Kenyon Way from 316 feet east of Fairmont Way to Milliken Ave. The ground cover on the west side of Milliken Ave from Kenyon Way to 566 feet north of Victoria Park Ln. The turf and ground cover on the west side of Capitol PI from Brown Dr to Bethany Dr. The paseo from Capitol PI and Brown Dr to Kenyon Way. Ground cover area: 34,241 square feet Turf area: 11,031 square feet Hardscape area: 5,320 square feet VG -11 The east and west side parkways and median of Milliken Ave from Base Line Rd to the Southern Pacific Railroad. The north side of Base Line Rd from 542 feet east of Milliken Ave to Milliken Ave. Ground Cover area: 31,367 square feet Turf area: 17,264 square feet Hardscape area: 25,524 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#2 Page 263 VG -12 The turf and ground cover on the south side of Fairmont Way from the southeast corner of Milliken Ave and Fairmont Way along the curb line to Victoria Park Ln. The turf and ground over on the west side of Fairmont Way from the southwest corner of Victoria Park Ln and Fairmont Way (located east of Milliken Ave) and continuing along the curb line to Milliken Ave. The turf on the east side of Milliken Ave from the Southern Pacific Railroad to 730 feet south of Victoria Park Ln. The ground cover on the east side of Milliken Ave from the Southern Pacific Railroad to 766 feet south of Victoria Park Ln. Ground Cover area: 53,068 square feet Turf area: 36,431 square feet Hardscape area: 27,004 square feet VG -13 The paseos from Victoria Park Ln to Verona Dr, Verona Dr to Napoli Dr, and Genova Rd to Tivoli PI. Ground Cover area: 17,993 square feet Turf area: 16,344 square feet Hardscape area: 8,376 square feet VG -14 The Base Line Rd median from Milliken Ave to Ellena East. The turf and ground cover on the north side of Base Line Rd from Ellena East to Ellena West. The turf and ground cover on the east side of Ellena West from Base Line Rd and following the curb line to Kenyon Way. The north side of Ellena West from Kenyon Way to Casoli PI. The turf and ground cover on both sides of Casoli PI from Ellena West to Candela Dr. The turf and ground cover on both sides of Crema PI from Ellena West to Candela Dr. Ground Cover area: 80,287 square feet Turf area: 62,999 square feet Hardscape area: 44,826 square feet VG -15 The turf and ground cover on the west side of Rochester Ave from the Southern Pacific Railroad to Base Line Rd. The turf and ground cover on the north side of Base Line Rd from Rochester Ave to Ellena East. The Base Line Rd Median from Rochester Ave to Ellena East. The turf and ground cover on the east side of Ellena East from Base Line Rd and continuing along that curb line to 275 feet north of Berra Rd. The turf and ground cover on both sides of Berra Rd from Ellena East to Comiso Way. Ground Cover area: 54,628 square feet Turf area: 57,306 square feet Hardscape area: 36,014 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#2 Page 264 VG -16 The Paseo from Base Line Rd to Ellena West with entrances to Amelia Dr and Pavola Dr. Ground Cover area Turf area: Hardscape area: 9,661 square feet 11,529 square feet 5,804 square feet VG -17 The paseo from Fairmont Way to the Southern Pacific Railroad. The paseo from Fabriano PI to Martano PI. Ground Cover area: 35,351 square feet Turf area: 40,291 square feet Hardscape area: 16,394 square feet VG -18 The paseo from Rapallo Dr to Gandino Dr and south to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground Cover area: 4,281 square feet Hardscape area: 1,308 square feet VG -19 The paseo from Tolentino Dr to Pizolli PI and to Tolentino Dr. Ground Cover area: 12,555 square feet Turf area: 17,856 square feet Hardscape area: 7,380 square feet VG -20 The turf on the east side of Milliken Ave from 730 feet south of Victoria Park Ln to Victoria Park Ln. The ground cover on the east side of Milliken Ave from 766 feet south of Victoria Park Ln to Victoria Park Ln. The turf and ground cover on the south side of Victoria Park Ln from the southeast corner at Milliken Ave heading east to Fairmont Way. The turf and ground cover on the north side of Victoria Park Ln from Parma PI to the northeast corner of Milliken Ave and Victoria Park Ln. The ground cover on the west side of Parma PI from Victoria Park Ln to Lomello Way. The Victoria Park Ln median from Milliken Ave to Pandino Ct. The Milliken Ave median from Victoria Park Ln to 440 feet south of Kenyon Way. The parkway on the west side of Milliken Ave from 420 feet south of Kenyon Way to Victoria Park Ln. Ground Cover area: 96,750 square feet Turf area: 77,461 square feet Hardscape area: 22,177 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#2 Page 265 VG -21 The ground cover on the east side of Parma PI from Victoria Park Ln to Lomello Way. The ground cover on the north side of Victoria Park Ln from Parma PI to 653 feet east of Kenyon Way. The turf on the north side of Victoria Park Ln from Parma PI to 547 feet east of Kenyon Way. The turf and ground cover on the south side of Victoria Park Ln from Fairmont Way to 422 feet east of Kenyon Way. The turf and ground cover on the east and west sides of Kenyon Way from Victoria Park Ln to the Southern Pacific Railroad. The paseo from Kenyon Way to Rapallo Dr. The paseo from Kenyon Way to Bari Dr. The Victoria Park Ln median from Pandino Ct to Portofino Dr. Ground Cover area: 85,865 square feet Turf area: 41,994 square feet Hardscape area: 34,478 square feet VG -22 The ground cover on the north side of Victoria Park Ln from 653 feet east of Kenyon Way to Rochester Ave. The turf on the north side of Victoria Park Ln from 547 feet east of Kenyon Way to Rochester Ave. The Victoria Park Ln median from Portofino Dr to Rochester Ave. The turf and ground cover on the south side of Victoria Park Ln north of the sidewalk from Kenyon Way to the east side of Vintage Park. The turf and ground cover on the south side of Victoria Park Ln from the east side of Vintage Park to Rochester Ave. The turf and ground cover on the west side of Rochester Ave from Victoria Park Ln to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground Cover area: 115,144 square feet Turf area: 57,927 square feet Hardscape area: 20,863 square feet VG -23 The turf and ground cover on the east side of Kenyon Way from Victoria Park Ln to 409 feet west of Grimaldi Rd. The ground cover on the south side of Portofino Dr from Kenyon Way to Bergano PI. The turf and ground cover on the north and south side of Lark Dr from Kenyon Way to the west property line of Rancho Cucamonga High School. The ground cover on the east and west side of Matera PI from Lark Dr to Pescara Rd. The ground cover on the north and south side of Grimaldi Rd from Kenyon Way to Brindisi Ct. The turf and ground cover on the west side of Kenyon Way from Lark Dr to Victoria Park Ln. The ground cover on the north and south side of Marcello Way from Kenyon Way to Landriano PI. The paseo from southwest corner of Kenyon Park to Kenyon Way. Ground Cover area: 63,733 square feet Turf area: 82,565 square feet Hardscape area: 39,297 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 16 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#2 Page 266 VG -24 The north side of Kenyon Way from Autumn Glen Ct to Woodruff PI. The east side of Woodruff PI from Kenyon Way to 403 feet north of Kenyon Way. Ground Cover area: 8,477 square feet Turf area: 5,320 square feet Hardscape area: 5,622 square feet VG -25 The paseo west of Torino Rd from Kenyon Way to Highland Ave. The turf and ground cover on the south side of Highland Ave from the northwest corner of Tract 13440 to the east end of Tract 13440. Ground Cover area: 40,800 square feet Turf area: 24,134 square feet Hardscape area: 14,353 square feet VG -26 The paseo from Brindisi Ct to Messina PI. The turf and ground cover on the north side of Brindisi Ct to the end of the cul-de-sac. The turf and ground cover on the west side of Messina PI from the paseo to Treviso Way. Ground Cover area: 18,905 square feet Turf area: 1,141 square feet Hardscape area: 3,615 square feet VG -27 The Milliken Ave median from 440 feet south of Kenyon Way to Highland Ave. The parkway on the west side of Milliken Ave from 420 feet south of Kenyon Way. Ground Cover area: 4,030 square feet Turf area: 3,006 square feet Hardscape area: 4,222 square feet VG -28 The east side of Rochester Ave from Victoria Park Ln to Highland Ave. Ground Cover area: 60,902 square feet Hardscape area: 5,593 square feet VG -29 The north side of Kenyon Way from Milliken Ave to Fairmont Way. The groundcover on the east side of Fairmont Way, east of the sidewalk, from Kenyon Way to the 210 freeway. Ground Cover area: 20,178 square feet Turf area: 16,877 square feet Hardscape area: 5,736 square feet VG -30 The south side of Tresenda Dr from Santo PI to Sappada PI. The paseo from Sappada PI to Carano PI. The south side of Montella Dr from Carano PI to Trivento PI. Ground Cover area: 6,797 square feet Turf area: 2,462 square feet Hardscape area: 4,860 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 17 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#2 Page 267 VG -31 The east side of Brienza PI from Larino Dr to Letini Dr. The west side of Tindari PI from Letini Dr to Larino Dr. The greenbelt on the south side of Marconi PI from Trivento PI to Comiso Way. The east side of Comiso Way from Scalea PI to Santo PI. Ground Cover area: 23,419 square feet Turf area: 18,351 square feet Hardscape area: 13,764 square feet VG -32 The north side of Candela Dr from Terni PI to Bettola PI. Ground Cover area: 20,172 square feet Turf area: 8,190 square feet Hardscape area: 8,292 square feet VG -33 The paseo at the north end of Sapri PI to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground Cover area: 894 square feet Hardscape area: 318 square feet VG -34 The paseo at the north end of Bronte PI to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground Cover area: 894 square feet Hardscape area: 318 square feet VG -35 The east side of Rochester Ave from 555 feet south of Palmi Dr to Victoria Park Ln. The south side of Victoria Park Ln and median from Rochester Ave to east side of Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 53,646 square feet Turf area: 11,150 square feet Hardscape area: 17,555 square feet VG -36 The north side of Victoria Park Ln from the east side of Deer Creek Channel to Rochester Ave. Ground Cover area: 55,780 square feet Turf area: 10,500 square feet Hardscape area: 8,004 square feet VG -37 The paseo at the end of Ardmoor Ct to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground Cover area: 1,350 square feet Hardscape area: 950 square feet VG -38 The east side of Milliken Ave from 106 feet north of Victoria Park Ln to Kenyon Way. The north and south side of Spring Mist Dr from Milliken Ave to Summerstone Ct. The south side of Kenyon Way from Milliken Ave to Kenyon Park. Ground Cover area: 28,051 square feet Turf area: 4,533 square feet Hardscape area: 12,879 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 18 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#2 Page 268 VG -39 The north side of Victoria Park Ln from Kenyon Way paseo to 132 feet east of Milliken Ave. The Kenyon Way paseo from Victoria Park Ln to Fairwinds Ct. The paseo from Victoria Park Ln to the south west corner of Kenyon Park. Ground Cover area: 55,089 square feet Turf area: 13,120 square feet Hardscape area: 7,676 square feet VG -40 The south side of Highland Ave from 413 feet west of Highland Ave paseo to Highland Ave paseo. The east side of Highland Ave paseo from Highland Ave to Kenyon Way. The north side of Kenyon Way from Highland Ave paseo to Autumn Glen Ct. Ground Cover area: 56,553 square feet Hardscape area: 12,314 square feet VG -41 The west side of Rochester Ave from 294 feet south of Highland Ave to Lark Dr. The north side of Lark Dr from Rochester Ave to 1230 feet west of Rochester Ave. Ground Cover area: 31,413 square feet Hardscape area: 13,338 square feet VG -42 The south side of Highland Ave from 1314 feet west of Rochester Ave to Rochester Ave. The west side of Rochester Ave from Highland Ave to 294 feet south of Highland Ave. The north side of Highland Ave from Rochester Ave to Woodruff PI. Ground Cover area: 40,346 square feet Hardscape area: 15,445 square feet VG -43 The north side of Victoria Park Ln and the median from Day Creek Blvd to Day Creek Channel. The east and west side of Kensington PI from Victoria Park Ln to Stratford Dr. Ground Cover area: 70,669 square feet Turf area: 7,888 square feet Hardscape area: 18,426 square feet VG -44 The west side of Day Creek Blvd from 572 feet north of Silverberry St to Day Creek Blvd. The south side of Silverberry St from Kensington PI to Day Creek Blvd. Ground Cover area: 36,835 square feet Hardscape area: 24,376 square feet VG -45 The west side of Milliken Ave and the Milliken Ave median from the 210 freeway to Kenyon Way. Ground Cover area: 10,658 square feet Turf area: 610 square feet Hardscape area: 5,589 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 19 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#2 Page 269 VG -46 The Base Line Rd median from 657 feet east of Virginia PI to Rochester Ave. The north side of Base Line Rd from 278 feet east of Virginia PI to Rochester Ave. The paseo from the northeast corner of Rochester Ave and Base Line Rd to Huntley Dr. The east side of Rochester Ave from Base Line Rd to 105 feet north of Shenandoah Dr. Ground Cover area: 33,135 square feet Hardscape area: 19,340 square feet VG -47 The north side of Base Line Rd from 400 feet east of Day Creek Blvd to Day Creek Blvd. Base Line Rd median from Day Creek Blvd to 595 feet east of Day Creek Blvd. Ground Cover area: 9,515 square feet Hardscape area: 7,926 square feet VG -48 The east side of Day Creek Blvd and median from Base Line Rd to Victoria Park Ln. The south side of Victoria Park Ln from Day Creek Blvd to 390 feet east of Day Creek Blvd. Ground Cover area: 50,318 square feet Turf area: 3,234 square feet Hardscape area: 29,217 square feet VG -49 The north side of Victoria Park Ln and median from 390 feet east of Day Creek Blvd to Day Creek Blvd. The east side of Day Creek Blvd from Victoria Park Ln to Highland Ave. The south side of Highland Ave from Day Creek Blvd to 440 feet east of Day Creek Blvd. Ground Cover area: 51,459 square feet Turf area: 3,930 square feet Hardscape area: 32,296 square feet VG -50 The west side of San Carmela Ct from 389 feet north of Base Line Rd to Base Line Rd. The north side of Base Line Rd from Carmela Ct to 264 feet west of Durness PI. Ground Cover area: 18,043 square feet Hardscape area: 12,383 square feet VG -51 The Paseo south of Saxon Dr to Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground Cover area: 1,398 square feet Hardscape area: 969 square feet VG -52 The north side of Sugar Gum St from Milliken Ave to Kensington PI. The south side of Sugar Gum St from Milliken Ave to 111 feet east of Suffolk PI. Ground Cover area: 4,362 square feet Hardscape area: 3,325 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 20 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#2 Page 270 VG -53 The south side of Victoria Park Ln from 296 feet west of Kensington PI to Milliken Ave. The west side of Day Creek Blvd from Victoria Park Ln to 397 feet south of Sugar Gum St. Ground Cover area: 28,532 square feet Turf area: 11,070 square feet Hardscape area: 7,720 square feet VG -54 The east side of Rochester Ave from Shenandoah Dr to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground Cover area: 6,864 square feet Hardscape area: 5,136 square feet VG -55 The paseo north of Westhaven PI to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground Cover area: 1,775 square feet Hardscape area: 2,575 square feet VG -56 The south side of Highland Ave from 1,317 feet west of Day Creek Blvd to 1,085 feet west of Day Creek Blvd including the non -irrigated slope on the south side of the sidewalk. Ground Cover area: 5,274 square feet Hardscape area: 1,761 square feet VG -57 The north side of Highland Ave from Fairmont Way to the Day Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 16,157 square feet Hardscape area: 17,405 square feet Ground cover, shrubs and turf areas that make up parkways, median islands and paseos are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company. Parks are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crews. Map of Improvements The following page shows the approximate location (for reference only — may not include all) of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites, and parks and community trails to be maintained by the District. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 21 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#2 Page 271 i2 BI 00 LO VI A r 3 N X a Milliken Av < � ? � G7 N l A/ 0 r ilw G� �w�� 0 0 Rochester Av_o- =•c�i 0 G1; w !< �•< C)w W • , G � N -C"=. -v N I• < Cl O L �l1� •g •� • � A 41 \qAvL— 1191:5 East Av • • Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2018/19 A 9 1 22 ATTACHMENT#2 Page 272 ii I cr CD N � East Av • • Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2018/19 A 9 1 22 ATTACHMENT#2 Page 272 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the District levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Fiscal Year 2018/19 Budget Expenditures Personnel Services: Regular Salaries $ 544,690 Overtime Salaries 1,090 Part-time Salaries 90,220 Fringe Benefits 273,240 Subtotal - Personnel 909,240 Operations and Maintenance: Operations and Maintenance: O & K//General 86,150 Vehicle Operations and Maintenance 5,000 Emergency Equipment and Vehicle Rental 200 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 91,350 Contract Services: Contract Services/General 1,365,910 Tree Maintenance 163,340 Subtotal - Contract Services 1,529,250 Utilities: Water Utilities 776,530 Electric Utilities 90,520 Subtotal - Utilities 867,050 Assessment Administration 31,390 Admin./General Overhead 280,010 Interfund Allocation 78,000 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 2,877,050 Capital Expenditures: Captial Outlay - Equipment 6,000 Captial Projects 110,000 Subtotal - Capital Expenditures 116,000 Total Expenditures Budget $ 3,902,290 Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 23 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#2 Page 273 Fiscal Year 2018/19 Budget Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies $ 3,496,470 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 34,730 Subtotal - Taxes 3,531,200 Other Revenues: Interest Earnings 46,380 Park Maintenance Fees 2,000 Subtotal - Other Revenues: 48,380 Transfer In: Transfer In - General Fund 299,540 Total Revenues Budget $ 3,879,120 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ (23,170) Total Gross Estimated Assessments $ 3,531,454.40 Total District EBU Count 77,113.24 Actual Assessment per EBU - Fiscal Year 2018/19 $ 45.80 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU - Fiscal Year 2018/19 $ 45.80 Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per Equivalent Benefit Unit ("EBU") will be based on the total amount of funds needed to maintain the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be the same or lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however, it may not exceed the maximum after the application of the cost of living inflator, as defined in this report, unless the excess increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Operating Reserve Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2018 $ 3,169,103 Contribution to Reserve - Fiscal Year 2018/19 (23,170) Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2019 $ 3,145,933 Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 24 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#2 Page 274 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements: Personnel Services: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time and part-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Additionally, this includes benefits available to City employees. Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District. Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Utilities: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity, water, and telephone services, as required, for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers in the District. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost of all particular departments and staff of the City, as well as consultants, for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual Engineer's Report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all central services departments of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational District within the City's administrative structure. Capital Outlay: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Other Revenues: This includes other revenues that are not levied through the annual assessments that support the District operations. These other revenues may include: interest earnings, other rental/lease income (cell site tower leases), Park Maintenance Fees, Sports Field User Group Rentals, and parking permits (Metrolink Station paid parking). Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 25 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#2 Page 275 BENEFITS FROM IMPROVEMENTS AND QUANTIFICATION Benefits from Improvements The improvements previously defined are expected to confer certain special benefits to parcels within the District. The benefits are described below. Sidewalks and Community Trails People walk for a variety of reasons, whether the reason is to commute to work or school, run errands, shop, leisure activities, fitness, or some other purpose. To enhance the overall walking experience, pedestrians seek out and utilize sidewalk facilities and community trails that are in close proximity to their property and provide a safe place to walk as well as an environment that provides a certain amount of visual interest. Sidewalks and community trails serve as a critical component in the transportation network providing users access to parks and recreational areas, schools, commercial areas, and neighbors. According to the U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) sidewalks provide many benefits including safety, mobility and healthier communities (FHWA, n.d). • Improved Aesthetics: A survey conducted by DMB (an Arizona based commercial developer) found that there was a strong demand for communities characterized by pedestrian access, a sense of connection, and a sense of community and diversity (Urban Land Institute, 2006). According to the Urban Land Institute report Creating Walkable Places: Compact Mixed -Use Solutions, people want their neighborhoods to provide more opportunities to walk (Urban Land Institute, 2006). A survey sponsored by the Surface Transportation Policy Project found that 55% of respondents would like to walk more, 63% would like to run errands on foot and walk to stores, and 79% would like sidewalks and other places to walk and exercise (Urban Land Institute, 2006). The continued maintenance of the inter -connecting sidewalks and community trails improves the livability and appeal for properties within the District. • Increased Safety: According to the FHWA, sidewalks reduce roadway accidents, including pedestrian/motor vehicle accidents. In addition, roadways without sidewalks are more than twice as likely to have pedestrians involved in accidents compared to sites with sidewalks on both sides of the street (FHWA, n.d.). In 2008, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's (NHTSA) National Pedestrian Crash Report identified California as one of the states with the highest number of pedestrian deaths (NHTSA, 2008). • Economic Activity: Uniform and well-maintained sidewalk and community trail improvements create cohesion throughout the District. This cohesion enhances both the residential and retail experience as well as encourages maximum use of building and lot area. According to Active Living Research (2010), economic benefits of walkable developments include enhanced marketability and faster sales or leases than conventional development. The National Complete Streets Coalition notes that street Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 26 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#2 Page 276 design that is inclusive of all modes of transportation, where appropriate, not only improves conditions for and access to existing businesses, but also is a proven method for attracting new development (Pugliese, 2008). Street Landscaping The overall appeal and safety of an area is enhanced when landscaping improvements are in place and kept in a healthy and satisfactory condition. Conversely, appeal and safety decreases when landscaping is overgrown, unsafe or destroyed by the elements or vandalism. • Improved Aesthetics: Street landscaping improvements improve the livability, commercial activity, appearance and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District. Regular maintenance ensures that the improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties adjacent to or in close proximity to the improvements within the District. According to the Victoria Transport Policy Institute (2011), streetscapes have a significant effect on how people view and interact with their community. With streetscapes that are safe and inviting, people are more likely to walk, which can help reduce automobile traffic, improve public health, stimulate local economic activity and attract residents to the community. • Increased Safety: Safety for pedestrians involves not only a degree of protection from vehicular accidents, but also from criminal activity. Well maintained areas mitigate crime, especially vandalism, and enhance pedestrian safety. A recent study has found that after landscape improvements were installed, there was a 46% decrease in crash rates across urban arterial and highway sites and a second study reviewed found a 5% to 20% reduction in mid -block crashes after trees and planters in urban arterial roads were put in place. In addition, there is less graffiti, vandalism, and littering in outdoor spaces with natural landscapes than in comparable plant -less spaces (Wolf, 2010). The Victoria Transport Policy Institute (2011) has found that streetscapes reduce traffic speeds, and when combined with improved pedestrian crossing conditions, can significantly reduce collisions. Furthermore, maintained sidewalks and trails increase pedestrian safety by reducing the number of trips and falls from those using the improvements. • Economic Activity: Well-maintained street landscape improvements not only make adjacent properties appear more stable and prosperous, but can spur investment in the property. According to the FHWA, landscaped sidewalks create an inviting place for customers to shop and do business (FHWA, 2001). Parks Park facilities enhance the overall quality of an area and are an important component of complete and sustainable neighborhoods. Neighborhood parks offer both active and passive recreational opportunities: a place to play, exercise, spend time with neighbors, or relax. The parks within the District are developed and maintained to appeal to all age groups and interests, Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 27 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#2 Page 277 and promote a healthy community. Recreation and park facilities have proven to be a potent factor in maintaining a high standard of livability in the community. • Improved Aesthetics. The park improvements provide beautification, shade and enhancement to properties, which creates a sense of community for the parcels within the District. The overall appeal and desirability of an area is enhanced when public parks and recreational facilities are in place, improved, operable, safe, clean and maintained. Conversely, appeal and desirability decrease when park and recreational facilities are unsafe or destroyed by the elements or vandalism. According to The Trust for Public Land, Corporate CEOs say that employee quality of life is the third most important factor in locating new businesses (Harnik and Welle, n.d.). • Economic Activity: Parks attract both businesses and residents to communities. According to The Trust for Public Land, small company owners say recreation, parks and open spaces in close proximity to properties used for business purposes are the highest priority in choosing a new location for their businesses. As a result of the collective improvements (sidewalks, community trails, street landscaping and parks) being maintained, the overall livability for properties within the District will increase. Livability encompasses several qualities and characteristics that are unique to a specific area. The Victoria Transport Policy Institute (2011) expands on the concept of livability and the various benefits associated with that designation: The livability of an area increases property desirability and business activity. Livability is largely affected by conditions in the public realm, places where people naturally interact with each other and their community, including streets, parks, transportation terminals and other public facilities. Livability also refers to the environmental and social quality of an area as perceived by employees, customers and visitors. This includes local environmental conditions, the quality of social interactions, opportunities for recreation and entertainment, aesthetics, and existence of unique cultural and environmental resources. Quantification of Benefit As a result of the District maintenance and servicing activities, there will be a level of general benefits to people that do not live in or intend to conduct business within the District. In order for property within the District to be assessed only for that portion of special benefits received from the District maintenance and servicing activities, general benefits provided by the ongoing maintenance and servicing of the improvements needs to be quantified. The amount of general benefit that is provided from the District maintenance activities cannot be funded via property owners' assessments. The District currently consists of 5,890 single family residences, 592 condominium units, 589 multi -family (apartment) units, 42.33 acres of commercial property, 4 schools, 1 Church, 1 fire Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 28 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#2 Page 278 station, and 36.99 acres of undeveloped property. Properties are classified by their land use code as shown on San Bernardino County's latest secured roll. Sidewalks and Community Trails The City is comprised of many smaller communities located throughout the City. Most of the communities have parks and schools that are proximate to and serve the residents in their immediate vicinity. There are four schools in addition to the six parks within the District. Two of the four schools have school District boundaries that are only within the District. However, two of the schools include areas outside of the District as part of their school district boundaries. The primary reason persons living outside the District would enter the District would be to access the schools. Therefore, we must consider the school district boundary areas outside of the District when analyzing the pedestrian traffic that may use the sidewalks and community trails within the District. The Summary of Travel Trends, 2009 National Household Travel Survey (NHTS) prepared by the U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration (FHWA, 2011) analyzed the number of person trips by various modes of transportations such as private vehicle, transit, walking or some other means of transportation. According to the Pacific Division data extracted from the 2009 NHTS database, of the annual 181,703 (in millions) total person trips, 21,252 (in millions) or 11.70% of those person trips were made by using walking as their mode of transportation (FHWA, 2011). According to the U.S. Census Bureau (2010), the average household size in the City is 2.98 persons. Based on this average household size, and considering there are 6,957 residential units within the District, there are approximately 20,732 people residing within the District boundaries. There are an estimated 12,000 residential units within the school district boundaries that are not within the boundaries of the District. Based on the City's average household size, there are approximately 35,760 persons residing outside of the District boundaries, but within the school district boundaries. The following shows the estimated number of residential units and persons within the school district boundaries and either within or outside the District boundaries: School District Population Estimated Number of Residential Units Estimated Number of Persons Within District Boundaries 6,957 20,732 Outside District Boundaries 12,000 35,760 Total Population 18,957 56,492 In order to determine the estimated total number of persons who are within close proximity to the sidewalk and trail improvements, and would utilize walking as their mode of transportation, we applied the 11.70% of person trips reported from the NHTS Pacific Division study, to the total number of persons within District and school district boundaries (56,492). There are Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 29 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#2 Page 279 approximately 6,610 people within proximity of the District that utilize walking as their mode of transportation. Applying the 2009 NHTS walking trip percentage to the District population (20,732), we estimate that of the 6,610 persons who are within close proximity of the District and use walking as their primary mode of transportation, 2,426 people are within the District boundaries. Therefore, the total surrounding neighborhood area population, located outside of the District boundaries, but in close proximity to the sidewalk and trail improvements, who use walking as their primary mode of transportation is estimated to be 4,184 people. In order to obtain a better picture of the overall level of general benefit provided by the sidewalk and community trail improvements, the pedestrian traffic that utilizes walking as the mode of transportation that will seek out and use sidewalks and community trails within the District's boundaries, but live outside of the District, must be considered. The 2009 NHTS further details the purposes of the 21,252 (in millions) reported walking trips. Based on the property types within the District, people utilizing the sidewalks and community trails within the District would most likely do so for the following reasons: walking to school, day care or religious activity, social or recreational activities, and shopping or running errands. The following details the number of walking trips, based on the 2009 NHTS study, for each of the activities that are the most likely reasons people outside of the District would use the sidewalk and community trail improvements within the District: Trip Purpose Estimated Number School District Population of Persons Within District Boundaries 2,426 Outside District Boundaries 4,184 Total Population — uses walking as 6,610 primary mode of transportation 9,099 In order to obtain a better picture of the overall level of general benefit provided by the sidewalk and community trail improvements, the pedestrian traffic that utilizes walking as the mode of transportation that will seek out and use sidewalks and community trails within the District's boundaries, but live outside of the District, must be considered. The 2009 NHTS further details the purposes of the 21,252 (in millions) reported walking trips. Based on the property types within the District, people utilizing the sidewalks and community trails within the District would most likely do so for the following reasons: walking to school, day care or religious activity, social or recreational activities, and shopping or running errands. The following details the number of walking trips, based on the 2009 NHTS study, for each of the activities that are the most likely reasons people outside of the District would use the sidewalk and community trail improvements within the District: Trip Purpose Number of Walking Trips (in millions) School/Daycare/Religious Activity 872 Shopping/Errands 5,820 Social/Recreational 2,268 Don't know/Other 139 Total 9,099 Of the total number of walking trips reported, 9,099 (in millions) or 42.81% are for purposes that persons outside of the District would utilize the sidewalk and trail improvements within the District. Applying this percentage (42.81°/x) to the number of people using walking as their mode of transportation and that live outside of the District (4,184), but use the sidewalks and community trails within the District, there are approximately 1,791 people using the maintained sidewalks and community trails for general benefit purposes. The persons engaging in general benefit activities represents 3.17% of the total school district population (56,492), and is therefore considered to be District general benefit. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 30 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#2 Page 280 School District Boundary General o Benefit 3.17/o Given the location and nature of the improvements, it is very unlikely the public at large would seek out or use the sidewalks and trails within the District, but would use those proximate to their own properties. The City has regional trails that connect different areas of the City, and those trails do appeal to and attract other residents of the City as well as residents that live outside the City. Nevertheless, it is likely that certain members of the public at large use the sidewalks or community trails within the District. As such, we have assigned a 1.00% general benefit for the sidewalk and community trails to the public at large. Public at large General Benefit 1 1.00% Based on the above calculations, the general benefit portion of the improved aesthetics, increased safety, and economic activity benefits resulting from the sidewalk and trail improvements is estimated to be 4.17% and the special benefit is estimated to be 95.83%. Sidewalk and Trail General Benefit 1 4.17% Street Landscaping Based upon the City's General Plan (2010) Roadway Hierarchy, the streets within the District are classified into one of the following categories: arterial, collector, or local (minor) streets. The majority of street landscaping is located along roads classified as collector and local streets and primarily situated within the public right-of-ways of the internal local street network. A portion of the maintained landscaping is, however, located along the arterial streets, and, as such, provides some general benefit to pass-through traffic. Local Streets For purposes of determining general and special benefits, all streets within the District other than the specific streets listed as collector and arterial streets below are considered local streets. The local streets within the District were intended to serve individual neighborhoods and not to be pass-through streets, but cul-de-sacs or loop roads to reduce through traffic (Victoria Community Plan, 1980). In addition, according to the City's General Plan (2010), the primary intended purpose of local streets is to serve fronting properties. From a visual inspection of the layout of the District one must conclude that the purpose of the local streets is exclusively intended for the benefit of the parcels on such streets. There is no local street that provides a direct or efficient means of traveling from one place to another such that one could reasonably expect a driver to purposefully choose the District's local streets as the best route for travel unless necessary because the route either began or ended with a parcel in the District. A route beginning or ending with a parcel within the District does not include the "general public" for purposes of determining general benefit. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 31 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#2 Page 281 However, one can imagine a minimal degree of pass through traffic even on something such as a cul-de-sac. As expressed by the Court in Beutz v. County of Riverside (2010), "... courts of this state have long recognized that virtually all public improvement projects provide general benefits." Given the location to the schools, parks, and shopping in the City, there are bound to be drivers that make use of the local streets for no other reason but to turn around or go back from where they came, especially if they are dropping their children off at one of the schools. Additionally, given the nature of the street landscaping, one could imagine a small degree of "residential tourism" wherein drivers are in fact simply "passing through" to enjoy the beautiful views of the homes, the natural surroundings or visiting friends. A conservative estimate of 1.00% for each scenario would result in the general benefit portion of the improved aesthetics, increase safety, and economic activity benefits resulting from the street landscaping improvements on local streets to be 2.00% and the special benefit is estimated to be 98.00%. Local Street General Benefit 1 2.00% Collector Streets: Victoria Park Ln, Etiwanda Ave, Highland Ave and Church St Because of the similarities in use, layout, type, and designation, the benefits of Victoria Park Ln, Etiwanda Ave, Highland Ave and Church St are considered to be equal. Etiwanda Ave, Highland Ave and Church St border the District and are used as the main access to and from properties within the District. Victoria Park Ln serves as the main access point to each of the four schools and is the connector street running through the District. Victoria Park Ln, Etiwanda Ave, Highland Ave and Church St connect the various neighborhoods, schools and parks within the District in addition to providing circulation between the local streets and the arterial network. As such, we must also consider the neighborhoods that surround the District and are within the school district boundaries, but not within the actual District when analyzing vehicle traffic that may use the streets within the District. The City's Traffic Study (2009) does not include the traffic volume and number of daily trips on the connector streets within the District. As such a study is unavailable at this time we have use the NHTS Pacific Division data in order to estimate the number of drivers who use the streets within the District. According to the Pacific Division data extracted from the NHTS database, of the annual 181,703 (in millions) total person trips, 152,827 (in millions) or 84.11 % of those trips were made using a personal motor vehicle (FHWA, 2011). According to the 2001 National Household Travel Survey, household file, U.S. Department of Transportation (2001), the mean drivers per household is 1.75. Based on the drivers per household average, and considering the 6,957 households within the District, there are approximately 12,175 drivers within the District. There are an estimated 12,000 residential units within the school district boundaries that are not within the boundaries of the District. Based on the drivers per household average, there are approximately 21,000 additional drivers that reside outside of the District boundaries, but are in close proximity to the District. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 32 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#2 Page 282 School District Population Estimated Number of Residential Units Estimated Number of Drivers Within District Boundaries 6,957 12,175 Outside District Boundaries 12,000 21,000 Total 18,957 33,175 Applying the percentage of vehicle trips (84.11 %) reported from the NHTS Pacific Division study to the District and school district boundaries area outside of the District population sets (33,175), approximately 27,903 people are within proximity of the District that utilize a private vehicle as their primary mode of transportation. Applying the 2009 NHTS vehicle trip percentage to the estimated number of drivers within the District (12,175) approximately 10,240 people within the District boundaries use a personal vehicle as their primary mode of transportation. Therefore, the total surrounding neighborhood area population, located outside of the District boundaries, that uses a vehicle as their mode of transportation is estimated to be 17,663 people. In order to obtain a better picture of the overall level of general benefit provided by the improvements, the vehicle traffic that will seek out and use the collector streets to access parcel's within the District, but live outside of the District, must be considered. The 2009 NHTS further details the purposes of the 152,827 (in millions) reported vehicle trips. Based on the property types within the District, people utilizing the collector streets to access properties within the District would most likely do so for the following reasons: attend school, day care or religious activity, social or recreational activities, and to shop or run errands. The following details the number of vehicle trips for each of the activities that are the most likely reasons people outside of the District would use the collector streets to access properties within the District: Trip Purpose Estimated Number School District Population of Persons Within District Boundaries 10,240 Outside District Boundaries 17,663 Total Population — uses personal vehicle 27,903 as primary mode of transportation 54,341 In order to obtain a better picture of the overall level of general benefit provided by the improvements, the vehicle traffic that will seek out and use the collector streets to access parcel's within the District, but live outside of the District, must be considered. The 2009 NHTS further details the purposes of the 152,827 (in millions) reported vehicle trips. Based on the property types within the District, people utilizing the collector streets to access properties within the District would most likely do so for the following reasons: attend school, day care or religious activity, social or recreational activities, and to shop or run errands. The following details the number of vehicle trips for each of the activities that are the most likely reasons people outside of the District would use the collector streets to access properties within the District: Trip Purpose Number of Vehicle Trips (in millions) School/Daycare/Religious Activity 6,470 Shopping/Errands 30,998 Social/Recreational 16,185 Don't know/Other 688 Total 54,341 Of the total number of vehicle trips reported, 54,341 (in millions) or 35.56% are for purposes that persons outside of the District would most likely utilize the collector streets within the District. Applying this percentage to the number of people using vehicles as their primary mode of Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 33 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#2 Page 283 transportation and live outside of the District (17,663), but would use Victoria Park Ln, Etiwanda Ave, Highland Ave or Church St as a connector to their destination within the District, there are approximately 6,281 people using the maintained streets for general benefit purposes. The persons engaging in general benefit activities represents 18.93% of the total estimated drivers (33,175), and is therefore considered to be District general benefit. As previously mentioned, the local street special benefit has been estimated at 98.00% and, as such, the estimated minimum special benefit of Victoria Park Ln, Etiwanda Ave, Highland Ave and Church St should be reduced by 2.00% to account for that portion of traffic using local streets representing general benefit. Based on the above calculations, the general benefit portion of the improved aesthetics, increased safety, and economic activity benefits resulting from the street landscaping improvements on collector streets is estimated to be 20.93% and the special benefit is estimated to be 79.07%. Collector Street General Benefit 20.93% Arterial Streets: Milliken Ave, Base Line Rd, Day Creek Blvd and Rochester Ave Arterial streets are intended to provide a higher degree of mobility and generally serve longer vehicle trips. The arterial streets with landscape improvements serve not only residents in the immediate vicinity, but persons who live outside of the District and are passing by. The City's Traffic Study (2009) does not identify the percentage of traffic on arterial streets, which is pass- through traffic. Before we determine and allocate the percentage of special and general benefit for the arterial streets, we must first compute the estimated pass-through traffic. In lieu of having a study that identifies the pass-through traffic on the arterial streets, the estimated number of special benefit trips on the collector streets has been used since in order to enter or exit the District, a vehicle must travel on one of the arterial streets listed below. Per the City's General Plan (2010), collector streets have an estimated 5,000 to 20,000 vehicles per day, for an average of 12,500. Taking the 12,500 average daily trips for collector streets, 2,616 trips (20.93%) are for general benefit purposes, and 9,884 trips (79.07°/x), is deemed to be for special benefit purposes. Estimated Number of Trips Collector Street Special Benefit — 79.07% 9,884 Collector Street General Benefit — 20.93%' 2,616 Total 12,500 (1) The 20.93% general benefit percentage already includes the 2.00% general benefit to account for the portion of traffic using for local streets. The City's Traffic Study (2009) does provide an estimated number of daily trips for specific areas within the District. When the City's Traffic Study (2009) did not provide the estimated number of daily trips the average number was derived from the estimates provided in the City's General Plan. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 34 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#2 Page 284 Street Name Average Number of Vehicles per Dayl Milliken Ave 30,400 Base Line Rd 19,140 Day Creek Blvd 25,000 Rochester Ave 12,500 (1) Average Number of Vehicles per Day is from the City's Traffic Study for Milliken Ave and Base Line Rd, (average based on City's Traffic Study at points of street within the District), and from the City's General Plan for Day Creek Blvd and Rochester Ave. Based on the estimated number of 9,884 trips for special benefit purposes, we then reduce the average number of vehicles for each arterial street, to calculate our estimated pass-through trips. The pass-through trips are vehicles driving along the maintained streets within the District for a portion of their trips, but not residing in the District or benefiting from the landscaping improvements in place. Street Name Average Number of Vehicles per Day Less: Estimated Special Benefit Trips Estimated Number of Pass Through Trips Estimated % General Benefit Milliken Ave 30,400 9,884 20,516 67.49% Base Line Rd 19,140 9,884 9,256 48.36% Day Creek Blvd 25,000 9,884 15,116 60.47% Rochester Ave 12,500 9,884 2,616 20.93% Although Rochester Ave is listed as an arterial, the City's General Plan (2010) Roadway Hierarchy includes this street as a Tertiary Travel Corridor, which categorizes the street as more locally oriented and locally travelled. In addition, the Roadway Hierarchy says that the typical number of vehicles per day is between 10,000 and 15,000 (average 12,500). Etiwanda Avenue and Church St are also included in the category, and as such, the general benefit trip percentage is close to the same as for the collector streets. As previously mentioned, the estimated minimum special benefit of Milliken Ave, Base Line Rd, Day Creek Blvd and Rochester Ave have already been reduced by 2% to account for that portion of traffic using local streets representing general benefit. Street Landscaping General Benefit Percentage The general benefit percentages determined in the previous sections were then applied to each type of road in the District. The area in square feet of landscaping being maintained in the District was determined by the City's Public Works Department. The general benefit percentage for each road and street type was multiplied by the total square footage being maintained for such street. The general benefit square footage was summed for all street segments and divided into the total square footage of all landscaping maintenance. The result is the overall general benefit percentage. The following table details this calculation. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 35 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#2 Page 285 Street Name Street Type (1) Total Square Footage General Benefit Percentage General Benefit Square Footage Milliken Ave Arterial 265,926 67.49% 179,473 Base Line Rd Arterial 367,018 48.36% 177,490 Day Creek Blvd Arterial 263,062 60.47% 159,074 Rochester Ave Arterial 175,573 20.93% 36,747 Church St Collector 181,344 20.93% 37,955 Etiwanda Ave Collector 10,358 20.93% 2,168 Highland Ave Collector 290,275 20.93% 60,755 Victoria Park Ln Collector 1,348,966 20.93% 282,339 Local/Minor Streets Local/Minor Streets 2,912,709 2.00% 58,254 Totals: 994,255 Street Landscaping General Benefit 1 17.10% Based on the above calculations, the general benefit portion of the improved aesthetics, increased safety, and economic activity benefits resulting from the street landscaping improvements is estimated to be 17.10% and the special benefit is estimated to be 82.90%. Neighborhood Parks The six parks within the District were installed specifically for the residents of the District. Each of the parks is considered to be a neighborhood park, intended to serve those parcels within a one-half mile radius from the park. All parcels within the District are within a one-half mile from one of the six neighborhood parks, and most parcels outside of the District have their own neighborhood parks within close proximity. Even though the park facilities were installed for the benefit of the residents and those working within the District, there will be some general benefit to those people who do not live or conduct business inside the District. There are 43.10 acres of park land within the District. According to the Trip Generation (2003) report, a City park generates an average of 1.59 trips per acre, with a range of rates between 1.04 — 8.00 (arithmetic mean is 4.52). Considering the mean rate per acre (4.52 trips), there are approximately 195 daily trips generated for parks within the District. According to the 2009 NHTS database, the average number of persons per vehicle is estimated to be 1.61 persons. Therefore, based on the 195 daily park trips generated, 314 people are using the parks within the District. There is a standard of one-half mile as a reasonable distance to walk to a park (California DOT, 1979). There are 6,957 households within the District, and an additional 1,834 households that are within a one-half mile and have direct access to the parks, but whose properties are not within the boundaries of the District. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 36 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#2 Page 286 One -Half Mile Park Population Estimated Number of Residential Units Percentage Within District Boundaries 6,957 79.14% Outside District Boundaries 1,834 20.86% Total Population 8,791 100.00% To allocate the average of park trips generated and people using the parks within the District, we allocate the 314 estimated people using the parks daily by the percentages shown above. Based on the one-half mile radius population, approximately 66 people may use the parks within the District, but living outside of the boundaries of the District. A factor that has been considered is that most of the people living within the one-half mile radius from the parks within the District also live within a closer distance to other parks that are not within the District, and will most likely use the parks that are closer in proximity to their property. However, in calculating the general benefit usage we recognize that those people may still use the District parks. Taking the 66 persons using the parks within the District, but residing outside of the District, divided by the total population residing outside of the District, but within one-half mile from the parks (1,834), the estimated percentage of persons engaging in general benefit park activities that do not reside within the District represents 3.60%. One -Half Mile Boundary General Benefit 3.60% Given the location and size of the parks, it is very unlikely the public at large would seek out or use these smaller, local parks. Especially, when the City has larger community and regional parks that are intended to attract people from outside areas, and provide recreational opportunities beyond those supplied by the neighborhood parks. However, various sports teams are allowed access to the parks for games even though according to the City, sports teams with members residing within the District are given first priority for use of the parks. Nevertheless, it is likely that certain members of the public at large may use the smaller parks, and as such, we have assigned a 1.00% general benefit for the park improvements to the public at large. Public at large General Benefit 1.00% Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 37 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#2 Page 287 Estimated Number of One -Half Mile People Using Park Population Parks Daily Within District Boundaries 248 Outside District Boundaries 66 Total Population 314 A factor that has been considered is that most of the people living within the one-half mile radius from the parks within the District also live within a closer distance to other parks that are not within the District, and will most likely use the parks that are closer in proximity to their property. However, in calculating the general benefit usage we recognize that those people may still use the District parks. Taking the 66 persons using the parks within the District, but residing outside of the District, divided by the total population residing outside of the District, but within one-half mile from the parks (1,834), the estimated percentage of persons engaging in general benefit park activities that do not reside within the District represents 3.60%. One -Half Mile Boundary General Benefit 3.60% Given the location and size of the parks, it is very unlikely the public at large would seek out or use these smaller, local parks. Especially, when the City has larger community and regional parks that are intended to attract people from outside areas, and provide recreational opportunities beyond those supplied by the neighborhood parks. However, various sports teams are allowed access to the parks for games even though according to the City, sports teams with members residing within the District are given first priority for use of the parks. Nevertheless, it is likely that certain members of the public at large may use the smaller parks, and as such, we have assigned a 1.00% general benefit for the park improvements to the public at large. Public at large General Benefit 1.00% Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 37 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#2 Page 287 Based on the above calculations, the general benefit portion of the improved aesthetics and economic activity benefits resulting from the park improvements is estimated to be 4.60% and the special benefit is estimated to be 95.40%. Park General Benefit 4.60% Collective General Benefit Since the District is comprised of improved aesthetics, increased safety and economic activity benefits resulting from a blend of improvements (sidewalks, trails, street landscaping and parks), the activity of both pedestrians and vehicles must be addressed in a collective form rather than independently. Therefore, the arithmetic mean of the general benefit percentages has been used to quantify the overall level of general benefit for the District. This general benefit result is provided in the table below: Sidewalk and Trail General Benefit 4.17% Street Landscaping General Benefit 17.10% Park General Benefit 4.60% District General Benefit 8.62% The general benefit, which is the percentage of the total budget that must be funded through sources other than assessments, is 8.62%. The special benefit then, which is the percentage of the budget that may be funded by assessments, is 91.38%. METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Overview Pursuant to the 1972 Act, Article XIII D of the California Constitution, and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act, all parcels that receive a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, permits the establishment of assessment districts by local agencies for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 38 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#2 Page 288 The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. " The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 commencing with Section 5000) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]. Section 22547 of the 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement". Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Examples of parcels exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and right-of- ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. Furthermore, Proposition 218 requires the City to separate general benefits from special benefits, whereas only special benefits may be assessed. As further detailed in the following sections, the Method of Assessment uses the following components to assign special benefit to each parcel: • Benefit Points: Assignment of points for aesthetic, safety and economic special benefits. • Benefit Factor: Multiplier. For residential parcels the benefit factor is units, and for non- residential parcels the benefit factor is lot size (acreage). • Benefit Units: Sum of a parcel's benefit points multiplied by the parcel's benefit factor. The total amount is the special benefit units assigned to a parcel. Apportioning of Special Benefit As previously outlined, each of the parcels within the District receives a special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services provided is identified and the proportionate special benefits derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 39 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#2 Page 289 The total costs of maintenance and operation, less the amount of general benefits identified, will be assessed to the parcels within the District based on the estimated benefit units assigned to each parcel. To assess special benefits appropriately, it is necessary to relate parcels of different land uses and development status to each other. The benefit unit method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment since there is a total of 5,890 single family parcels within the District which represents 90.96% of the total assessable parcels within the District. The following shows how each parcel's benefit units have been determined. Aesthetic Benefit Points Aesthetic Benefit Points are assigned based upon the property's proximity to the improvements as well as the property's existing land use. All Single Family Residential parcels are located within the same proximity to the collective improvements (sidewalks, community trails, street landscaping and one-half mile from one of the parks). Each Single Family Residential parcel is fronted by sidewalk improvements, is within a one-half mile from one of the neighborhood parks, and uses the roads with street landscaping to enter and exit the District. In addition, the community trails are located throughout the District and serve as connectors between the different neighborhoods, school and shopping locations. All properties are within similar proximity to the trail improvements. Many trails are located along the sidewalks and streets, and all properties within the District have access to the trails through the various access points located throughout the entire District. The Single Family Residential parcels within the District are relatively similar in both building size and lot size. Since the improvements are provided uniformly throughout the District, Single Family Residential parcels are assigned 4.00 aesthetic benefit points, one for each of the improvement types. Multi -Family and Condominium parcels are within close proximity to the sidewalks, and receive the benefit of having maintained sidewalks for users to travel and access the property. Although these parcels benefit from the aesthetics of the sidewalks they do not receive the same benefit as Single Family Residential parcels, since Multi -Family and Condominium parcels do not have continuous sidewalk improvements along the frontage of each parcel/unit. Multi -Family and Condominium parcels are within a one-half mile of the neighborhood parks, use the roads with street landscaping to enter and exit their housing complexes within the District, and are in close proximity to the trail improvements. Accounting for the lower average household size of Multi - Family and Condominium parcels, and not having continuous sidewalk improvements directly fronting their property/unit, these properties have a reduced level of benefit from the improvements. Multi -Family and Condominium parcels are assigned 2.80 benefit points. Maintained sidewalks and street landscaping create an aesthetically pleasing environment for both employees and patrons of commercial properties. The overall aesthetics, interest and desirability of commercial properties within the District increase, as a result of the maintenance and servicing of the collective improvements. Based on the City's Land Use Plan and residential designations of homes within the District, there is an average of six Single Family Residential properties per acre within the District (General Plan, 2010). However, given the nature of their property use type, Commercial properties do not receive the same level of benefit Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 40 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#2 Page 290 from the trail and park improvements in relationship to residential land uses. Commercial properties are assigned 16.00 benefit points. A handful of parcels within the District are used to provide public services (such as fire stations, schools, churches and other similar uses) to the surrounding community, and are located based upon their proximity to the parcels they serve. These parcels benefit from the collective improvements in place, but at a reduced level compared to a Single Family Residential parcel, due to the nature of the improvements and their land use. In addition, these public service parcels are in place for the surrounding community, and the existence of well-maintained parks, street landscaping and community trails is not a significant factor in the decision to locate those facilities. Given the nature of their property use types, these public service parcels are assigned a 1.00 benefit points in recognition of the limited benefit they receive from the improvements maintained by the District. Undeveloped parcels within the District receive an aesthetic benefit from the maintenance of the collective improvements, but given the very limited activity and pedestrian access that these properties provide, properties within this land use category receive a reduced level of benefit. To account for this reduced benefit, all undeveloped properties are assigned 0.40 benefit points. Common area, roads and easements are deemed to receive no benefit from the District maintenance activities because they serve as connectors for other properties and do not receive benefit from the increased aesthetics. Utility parcels are located based on their proximity to the parcels they serve, and based upon their property usage (wireless towers, flood control basins and fire trail/access roads) do not benefit from the increased aesthetics. The following shows the aesthetic benefit points assigned to the parcel land use categories within the District: Parcel Land Use Category Aesthetic Benefit Points Single Family Residential 4.00 Condominium Residential 2.80 Multi -Family Residential 2.80 Commercial/Industrial 16.00 Public Service Parcels — Church/Fire Station/School 1.00 Undeveloped 0.40 Common Area/Roads/Easements/Utility 0.00 Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 41 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#2 Page 291 Safety Benefit Points Safety Benefit Points are assigned based upon the property's proximity to the improvements as well as the property's existing land use. The Single Family Residential parcels within the District are relatively similar in both building size and lot size. Since the sidewalks, trails and street landscaping improvements are provided uniformly throughout the District, Single Family Residential parcels are assigned 3.00 safety benefit points, one for each of the improvement types. Based on the additional pedestrian traffic that commercial property generates compared to residential property, and that there is an average of six Single Family Residential Properties per acre within the District, Commercial parcels are assigned 18.00 benefit points. Multi -Family and Condominium parcels are within close proximity to the sidewalks, and receive the benefit of having maintained sidewalks, trails and street landscaping for users to travel and access the property. Multi -Family and Condominium parcels receive a reduced level of benefit from the safety of the sidewalks as they do not receive the same benefit as parcels that have continuous sidewalk improvements along the entire frontage of their parcel/unit. In addition, Multi -Family and Condominium parcels have a lower average household size, which results in a reduced volume of pedestrian traffic on the sidewalks and trails compared to a Single Family Residential parcel. Multi -Family and Condominium parcels are assigned 2.10 benefit points. A handful of parcels within the District are used to provide public services (such as fire stations, schools, churches and other similar uses) to the surrounding community, and are located based upon their proximity to the parcels they serve. However, based on the nature and location of the sidewalk and street landscaping improvements and public access to these properties, these parcels receive a safety benefit from the maintenance of the improvements. These public service parcels are assigned 2.00 benefit points in recognition of the benefit they receive. Well maintained green areas reduce the occurrence of crime and vandalism, and as such the maintenance of the improvements within the District create a safety benefit for the undeveloped parcels within the District. However, the safety benefit is reduced compared to a Single Family Residential parcels due to the very limited activity and pedestrian access that these properties provide. Undeveloped properties are assigned 0.30 benefit points. Common area, roads and easements are deemed to receive no benefit from the District maintenance activities because they serve as connectors for other properties and do not receive benefit from the increased aesthetics. Utility parcels are located based on their proximity to the parcels they serve, and given the nature of the property usage ((wireless towers, flood control basins and fire trail/access roads) do not benefit from the increased safety. The following shows the safety benefit points assigned to the parcel land use categories within the District: Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 42 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#2 Page 292 Parcel Land Use Category Safety Benefit Points Single Family Residential 3.00 Condominium Residential 2.10 Multi -Family Residential 2.10 Commercial/Industrial 18.00 Public Service Parcels — Church/Fire Station/School 2.00 Undeveloped 0.30 Common Area/Roads/Easements/Utility 0.00 Economic Benefit Points Accounting for the existing economic activity throughout the District, as well as the potential for properties to develop, redevelop and invest in their economic presence, properties within the District are assigned benefit points for the economic activity benefits received from the uniform and maintained improvements. Economic activity benefit points are assigned based upon the property's location to the District activities, as well as the property's existing land use. The District's improvements will allow properties to maximize their development, land use and occupancy rates. Residential land uses are assigned benefit points in proportion to the number of trips generated and average number of occupants per dwelling unit in comparison to the typical single family parcel. Single Family Residential parcels are assigned 4.00 benefit points, one for each of the improvement types. Studies have consistently shown that the average multi -family residential unit impacts infrastructure approximately 80% as much as a single family residence. Condominium parcels are assigned 3.20 benefit points since the number of trips generated per condominium unit is approximately 80% of the typical single family residential units (Trip Generation, 2003). Multi -family residential parcels are assigned 2.40 benefit points per dwelling unit since the number of trips generated per multi -family residential unit, per the City's Traffic Study (2009), are 60% of the typical single family residential unit. To recognize the increase in economic activity and additional pedestrian traffic that non- residential properties generate compared to residential property, non-residential Commercial properties are assigned benefit points based on the average trip generations of non-residential property compared to a Single Family Residential property. Based on the City's Traffic Study (2009), and given that the non-residential parcels within the District are of mixed uses, the trip generation rate for non-residential parcels averages just under 320 trips per acre, which is approximately 5.6 times per acre that of a single family residential development. The trip generation rate is reduced to account for pass-through trips which are estimated to be 20%. Therefore, the economic benefit points assigned Commercial parcels is 4.50 per one residential benefit point. Commercial properties are assigned a total of 18.00 economic benefit points. The public services parcels and utility parcels within the District are used to provide services to the surrounding community, and are located based upon their proximity to the parcels they serve. These parcels receive no economic benefit from the collective improvements in place. Therefore, they are not assigned benefit points for economic activities. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 43 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#2 Page 293 The availability of well-maintained sidewalk, landscaping and park improvements within the local community enhances the ability of owners of undeveloped parcels of land to develop those parcels, as studies have shown that there is an increase in demand for residents and businesses to locate within communities with well-maintained sidewalk, landscaping and park improvements. However, since undeveloped parcels generate fewer trips and given the limited activity these properties provide, they receive a reduced economic benefit from the maintenance of the collective improvements. To account for this reduced benefit, but still recognize development potential, all undeveloped properties are assigned 1.50 benefit points. Common areas and roads are deemed to receive no benefit from the District maintenance activities because they serve as connectors for other properties and do not receive an economic benefit. The following shows the economic benefit points assigned to the parcel land use categories within the District: Parcel Land Use Category Economic Benefit Points Single Family Residential 4.00 Condominium Residential 3.20 Multi -Family Residential 2.80 Commercial/Industrial 18.00 Public Service Parcels — Church/Fire Station/School 0.00 Undeveloped 1.50 Common Area/Roads/Utility 0.00 Total Special Benefit Points Calculation The formula below shows the total special benefit points calculation for each parcel within the District: Parcel's Total Parcel's Parcel's Parcel's Special Benefit = Aesthetic + Safety + Economic Points Benefit Points Benefit Points Benefit Points Parcel Factors The method of apportioning the benefit to the parcels within the District reflects the proportional special benefit assigned to each property within the District based upon various property characteristics of parcels as compared to other properties within the District. By adjusting the assigned special benefit points set forth above by parcel factors, a more complete picture of the proportional special benefits received by each parcel within the District is presented. Given that the special benefits provided by the District focus on aesthetic benefit, safety benefit, and economic activity benefits, it was determined that lot size (acreage) for non-residential parcels and units for residential parcels were the most appropriate parcel factors. The number of units for non-residential parcels would not accurately reflect the amount of development and Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 44 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#2 Page 294 redevelopment that may occur. In addition, a larger parcel allows for a greater area to develop and redevelop than smaller parcels, which corresponds to larger parcels receiving proportionately greater aesthetic, safety and economic activity benefits when compared to smaller parcels within the District. Therefore, the benefits assigned for each parcel in the District is in direct proportion to the size of the parcel and potential development of the parcel. Residential parcels are limited by the number of units on the parcel more than the actual lot size. However, the greater the lot size, the more units can be placed on a parcel, and the more persons who use and benefits from the collective improvements. Therefore, the benefits assigned for each parcel in the District is in direct proportion to the units assigned to that parcel. The formula below shows the parcel factor calculation for each parcel within the District: Residential Parcel Factor = Units Non -Residential Parcel Factor = Acreage Total Benefit Units per Parcel Calculation To appropriately quantify and assign the total benefit units for each parcel within the District, the total special benefit points are further adjusted according to the formula below: Parcel's Total Parcel's Total Parcel Benefit Units = Special Benefit X Factor Points Total Special Benefit Units The total special benefit units for the District at this time are 77,113.24 Data Considerations and Parcel Changes The use of the latest Assessor's Secured Roll information has been and shall be used in the future as the basis in determining each parcel's land use category, units and lot size (acreage), unless better data was or is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number, the land use category, units and lot size (acreage) of the subsequent valid parcels shall serve as the basis in assigning parcel factor special benefit units. If a single parcel changes to multiple parcels, the special benefit units shall be recalculated based on the property type, number of units and acreage data for the new parcels, rather than each new parcel receiving a proportionate share of the original assessment. Special Considerations: Publicly Owned Parcels Any publicly owned parcels that benefit from the improvements cannot be exempt from the assessment. The special benefits accruing to these types of parcels must be determined using the same kind of formulas and benefit point assignment as applied to privately owned parcels. This requirement is clearly conveyed in Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution which states in part, "... Parcels within a district that are owned or used by any agency, the State of California or the United States shall not be exempt from assessment unless the agency can Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 45 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#2 Page 295 demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that those publicly owned parcels in fact receive no special benefit." Publicly owned parcels are categorized and assigned benefit units using the same methodology as privately owned parcels, based on their land use as shown on the latest County Secured Roll. Rate per Benefit Unit The assessment rate per special benefit unit is calculated by dividing the total cost estimate to be assessed by the total special benefit units assigned to the parcels in the District. The following formula provides the assessment rate per special benefit unit calculation: Rate per Total Costs to District's Total Benefit Unit be Assessed / Benefit Units Method of Assessment Spread The method of assessment is based upon a formula that assigns the special benefits to each parcel, with special benefit points being adjusted by the parcel's number of units or lot size (acreage). The formula below provides a summary of the annual assessment calculation for each parcel in the District. A (B) C Parcel's Total - Parcel's Total X Parcel Benefit Units Special Benefit Factor Points (B) Parcel's Parcel's Parcel's Parcel's Total Special Benefit Aesthetic + Safety + Economic Points Benefit Points Benefit Points Benefit Points (C) Residential Parcel Factor = Units Parcel Factor Non -Residential Parcel Factor = Acreage Applying the Method of Assessment Spread The maximum assessment for each parcel in the District is calculated by the following procedure: Step 1: Assign each parcel its appropriate land use category based on the most recent San Bernardino County Assessor's Secured Roll data. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 - City of Rancho Cucamonga 46 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#2 Page 296 Step 2: Step 3: Step 4: Determine each parcel's appropriate aesthetic benefit points based on land use. The aesthetic benefit points are shown in the following table: Parcel Land Use Category Aesthetic Benefit Points Single Family Residential 4.00 Condominium Residential 2.80 Multi -Family Residential 2.80 Commercial/Industrial 16.00 Public Service Parcels — Church/Fire Station/School 1.00 Undeveloped 0.40 Common Area/Roads/Easements/Utility 0.00 Determine each parcel's appropriate safety benefit points based on land use. The safety benefit points are shown in the following table: Parcel Land Use Category Safety Benefit Points Single Family Residential 3.00 Condominium Residential 2.10 Multi -Family Residential 2.10 Commercial/Industrial 18.00 Public Service Parcels — Church/Fire Station/School 2.00 Undeveloped 0.30 Common Area/Roads/Easements/Utility 0.00 Determine each parcel's appropriate economic benefit points based on land use. The economic benefit points are shown in the following table: Parcel Land Use Category Economic Benefit Points Single Family Residential 4.00 Condominium Residential 3.20 Multi -Family Residential 2.80 Commercial/Industrial 18.00 Public Service Parcels — Church/Fire Station/School 0.00 Undeveloped 1.50 Common Area/Roads/Utility 0.00 Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 47 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#2 Page 297 Step 5: Sum the aesthetic benefit points, safety benefit points and economic benefit points for each parcel. The total benefit points are shown in the following table: Parcel Land Use Category Aesthetic Benefit Points Safety Benefit Points Economic Benefit Points Total Benefit Points Single Family Residential 4.00 3.00 4.00 11.00 Condominium Residential 2.80 2.10 3.20 8.10 Multi -Family Residential 2.80 2.10 2.80 7.70 Commercial/Industrial 16.00 18.00 18.00 52.00 Public Service Parcels — Church/ Fire Station/ School 1.00 2.00 0.00 3.00 Undeveloped 0.40 0.30 1.50 2.20 Common Area/ Roads/ Easements/ Utility 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Step 6: Determine the appropriate parcel factor based on the parcel's land use. The unit of measurement for each parcel factor, by land use, is shown in the following table: Residential Parcel Factor = Units Non -Residential Parcel = Acreage Factor Step 7: Multiply the total benefit points by parcel factor to compute each parcel's total special benefit units. Step 8: Sum the result of Step 7 for all parcels in the District. Step 9: Separate the general benefit from the special benefit, and divide the portion of the budget representing special benefit by the result of Step 8 to compute the rate per benefit unit. Step 10: Multiply each parcel's total benefit units by the result of Step 9 to compute each parcel's assessment. Step 11: In future years the rate per benefit unit may be adjusted by inflation. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 48 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#2 Page 298 Proposed Maximum Assessment Rates The Fiscal Year 2018/19 maximum allowable assessment rate is calculated by dividing the net total to be assessed by the total special benefit units assigned to parcels in the District based on property type, unit and acreage data. For Fiscal Year 2018/19, the calculation is as follows: Maximum Assessment __ Special Benefit / District's Total per Benefit Unit to be Assessed Benefit Units $45.80 = $3,531,786.39 / 77,113.24 Parcel Land Use Category Total Benefit Points Parcel Factor Maximum Allowable Assessment for 2018/19 Single Family Residential 11.00 Parcel $503.80 Condominium Residential 8.10 Unit 370.98 Multi -Family Residential 7.70 Unit 352.66 Commercial/Industrial 52.00 Acre 2,381.60 Public Service Parcels - Church/ Fire Station/ School 3.00 Acre 137.40 Undeveloped 2.20 Acre 100.76 Common Area/ Roads / Easements/ Utility 0.00 Parcel 0.00 Cost of Living Inflator Each fiscal year, beginning Fiscal Year 2014/15, the maximum allowable assessment amount may be increased by the lesser of 3% or the percentage change in the year ending February preceding the start of the Fiscal Year of the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (CPI -U), for the Los Angeles -Riverside -Orange County area. If for any reason the percentage change is negative, the maximum allowable assessment would not be decreased by reason of such negative percentage change and would remain at the amount as computed on the previous fiscal year regardless of any CPI -U adjustment. If operating costs are such that the maximum assessment amount is not needed, the City would levy only what is needed for that fiscal year. The actual assessment rate for Fiscal Year 2018/19 will increase from $489.17 to $503.80 per single-family residence, a rate increase of 3.0% as compared to Fiscal Year 2017/18. The proposed Fiscal Year 2018/19 rates are equal to or less than the maximum allowable assessment amount authorized by Proposition 218. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 49 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#2 Page 299 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the San Bernardino County Assessor Office, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 50 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#2 Page 300 a D o 90.ail Grove Av Vineymard Av A � a Hellman Av Archibald Av Hermosa Av Haven Av Milliken Av Rochester Av Etiwanda Av A S2 East Av 0 N CL � 1 Carnelian St I Hellman Av Archibald Av Hermosa Av Haven Av Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 51 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#2 Page 301 Milliken Av Rochester Av Creek,Bl 1 v O• Etiwanda Av! i cD (D m D o 00 v �. o i Z a r (D O CL '! 0 Cherry Av o n r� w O Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 51 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#2 Page 301 ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2018/19 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2018/19 actual assessments for the District: Property Type (County Use Code) Actual Assessment Rate Per EBU Total Units/ Acres Total EBUs Total Assessment Single Family Residential $45.80 5,890.00 64,790.00 $2,967,205.30 Condominium Residential 45.80 592.00 4,795.20 219,472.16 Multi -Family Residential 45.80 589.00 4,535.30 207,716.74 Commercial/ Industrial 45.80 42.33 2,722.98 124,716.85 Public Service Parcels — Church/Fire Station/ School 45.80 70.271 210.821 9,646.07 Undeveloped 45.80 36.99 58.94 2,697.28 Total 7,220.59 77,113.24 $3,531,454.40 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations The following annexations are effective for Fiscal Year 2018/19: APN Annexation Date Project Name Total Units/Acres Total EBUS Property Type 1089-031-37 02/15/17 PM 19637 10.04 522.08 Commercial Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 52 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#2 Page 302 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2018/19 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A (Hyssop) Page 303 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3A (HYSSOP) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2700 Fax: 909.477.2849 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Lynne B. Kennedy, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Sam Spagnolo, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director Page 304 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER 1 INTRODUCTION 3 Reason for Assessment 3 Process for Annual Assessment 3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 4 Description of the Boundaries of the District 4 Description of Improvements and Services 4 Map of Improvements 5 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 7 District Budget 7 Definitions of Budget Items 8 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 9 Overview 9 General Benefit 10 Special Benefit 11 Method of Assessment Spread 11 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM 12 ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS 14 Assessment Roll 14 Page 305 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July 18, 2018, the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 18-053, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A (Hyssop) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed staff to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2018/19 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. Expenditures Operations and Maintenance Total Expenditures Budget Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments Other Revenues: Interest Earnings Total Revenues Budget Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance Total District EBU Count Actual Assessment per EBU Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU Fiscal Year 2018/19 Budget $ 10,050 10,050 3,690 530 4,220 $ (5,830) $ $ 9.00 413.74 413.74 Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A — City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#3 Page 306 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. 2. 1 have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, I certify that the Annual Engineer's Report and Assessment Diagram included herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A — City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#3 Page 307 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement or facility such as paseos, community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, and providing for the growth, vigor and care of the trees and landscape plant materials. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting of landscape or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the District for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally, describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the District by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the District. • Refers to the Engineer's Report, on file with the City Clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the City Clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A — City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#3 Page 308 conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including the improvements, to the zones within the District, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area of the City South and East of Hyssop Dr south of 6th St. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements maintained by the District include the trees, landscaped sites and appurtenant facilities that are throughout the District. These improvements are located within the street right- of-ways and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, the pruning, fertilizing, mowing, weeding, pest control, removal of trash/debris, and irrigation of the trees, shrubs, vines, ground cover, and turf. Maintenance of associated improvements and facilities, such as community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, includes but is not limited to, grading and replacement of trail surfacing, trail fence repair and replacement, steel fence painting, repair and replacement, and irrigation systems control, adjustment, trouble -shooting, repair and replacement. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, capital projects and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A — City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#3 Page 309 use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Site # Descriptive Location J-1 The west side of Hyssop Dr from south of 6th St to the south end of the cul-de-sac. Ground Cover area: 6,050 square feet Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A — City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#3 Page 310 �g2 da$si�7i Milliken Avng ti a 7¢s9 S q I i Ig ala 1,14 i�e$�it� 1 I 1 1 1 1 r a>, I • Charles Smith Av � 1 74 n j ----+ 3 � O� w � A) f� i:!t ;v► n j w i I 1 i (D CL r 0) CD 3 D O CD Etiwanda A_vCD, m i v' 1 7 1 Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A — City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#3 Page 311 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the District levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Total Expenditures Budget 10,050 Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments $ 3,690 Other Revenues: Interest Earnings 530 Total Revenues Budget $ 4,220 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ (5,830) Total Gross Estimated Assessments $ 3,723.66 Total District EBU Count 9.00 Actual Assessment per EBU - Fiscal Year 2018/19 $ 413.74 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU - Fiscal Year 2018/19 $ 413.74 Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A — City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#3 Page 312 Fiscal Year 2018/19 Budget Expenditures Operations and Maintenance: Operations and Maintenance: O & M/General $ 1,250 Contract Services: Contract Services/General 5,030 Tree Maintenance 900 Subtotal - Contract Services 5,930 Utilities: Water Utilities 1,320 Electric Utilities 900 Subtotal - Utilities 2,220 Assessment Administration 50 Adm in./General Overhead 600 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 10,050 Total Expenditures Budget 10,050 Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments $ 3,690 Other Revenues: Interest Earnings 530 Total Revenues Budget $ 4,220 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ (5,830) Total Gross Estimated Assessments $ 3,723.66 Total District EBU Count 9.00 Actual Assessment per EBU - Fiscal Year 2018/19 $ 413.74 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU - Fiscal Year 2018/19 $ 413.74 Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A — City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#3 Page 312 The maximum allowable assessment per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in Fiscal Year 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however, it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Operating Reserve Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2018 $ 34,170 Contribution to Reserve - Fiscal Year 2018/19 (5,830) Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2019 $ 28,340 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time and part-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Additionally, this includes benefits available to City employees. Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District. Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Utilities: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity, water, and telephone services, as required, for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers in the District. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost of all particular departments and staff of the City, as well as consultants, for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual Engineer's Report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A — City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#3 Page 313 General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all central services departments of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational District within the City's administrative structure. Capital Outlay: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Other Revenues: This includes other revenues that are not levied through the annual assessments that support the District operations. These other revenues may include: interest earnings, other rental/lease income (cell site tower leases), Park Maintenance Fees, Sports Field User Group Rentals, and parking permits (Metrolink Station paid parking). METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Overview Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 commencing with Section 5000) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]. Section 22547 of the 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement". Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A — City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#3 Page 314 Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights -of -ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. General Benefit Section 4 of Article XIII D of the California Constitution provides that once a local agency which proposes to impose assessments on property has identified those parcels that will have special benefits conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed, the local agency must next "separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred," and only the special benefits can be included in the amount of the assessments imposed. In this District, the improvements being financed consists of the maintenance of local improvements located within the boundaries of the District and include paseos, street trees, landscaped areas and appurtenant facilities that are located throughout the District and were installed to create a common landscape theme and neighborhood identity for parcels within the District. The improvements are situated within the public rights-of-way of the internal local street network within the District which provides ingress and egress for parcels within the District to access the City's system of arterial streets. City residents and traffic from parcels not within the District do not use the internal local street network or paseos except for the express purpose of accessing properties located within the District, and therefore do not benefit from the improvements. Only parcels which are within the District and proximate to the improvements and within the District are being assessed. Accordingly, there is a direct physical and visual nexus between each parcel being assessed and the improvements to be funded by the assessment that does not exist for parcels outside of the District boundary and that is particular and distinct from that shared by the public at large. Under these circumstances, all of the benefits conferred are direct and local in nature, and provide a benefit to only those parcels located within the boundaries of the District. Based upon this, it has been determined that there is no quantifiable general benefit to the surrounding community and the public in general from the maintenance of the improvements within the boundaries of the District, and therefore no portion of the project costs should be attributed to general benefit. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A — City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#3 Page 315 Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District and, as such, confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District, only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements is identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined; however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since Fiscal Year 1996/97. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The EBU method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one EBU. Every other land -use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land -use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A — City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#3 Page 316 following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land -use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land -Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Property Type (County Use Code) EBU Value Multiplier Non -Residential 1.00 Parcel The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2018/19 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the San Bernardino County Assessor Office, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A — City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#3 Page 317 Maximum Allowable Actual Assessment Asessment Rate Total Property Type (County Use Code) Rate per EBU per EBU Units/Acres Total EBUs Non -Residential $413.74 $413.74 9.00 9.00 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the San Bernardino County Assessor Office, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A — City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#3 Page 317 Hellman Av Archibald Av Hermosa Av Haven Av Milliken Av Rochester Av Etiwanda Av rZ I 2 W y Q M y o 2 n -lian St I ian Av bald Av osa Av n Av =n Av Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A — City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#3 Page 318 ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2018/19 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2018/19 actual assessment for the District: A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations There were no effective annexations for the Fiscal Year 2018/19. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A — City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#3 Page 319 Actual Assessment Total Property Type (County Use Code) Rate per EBU Units/Acres Total EBUs Total Assessment Non -Residential $413.74 9.00 9.00 $3,723.66 Totals 9.00 9.00 $3,723.66 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations There were no effective annexations for the Fiscal Year 2018/19. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A — City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#3 Page 319 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2018/19 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B (Commercial Industrial) Page 320 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B (COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2700 Fax: 909.477.2849 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Lynne B. Kennedy, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Sam Spagnolo, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director Page 321 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER 1 INTRODUCTION 3 Reason for Assessment 3 Process for Annual Assessment 3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 4 Description of the Boundaries of the District 4 Description of Improvements and Services 4 Map of Improvements 8 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 10 District Budget 10 Definitions of Budget Items 12 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 13 Overview 13 General Benefit 14 Special Benefit 14 Method of Assessment Spread 15 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM 16 ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS 18 Assessment Roll 18 Annexations 18 Page 322 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July 18, 2018, the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 18-053, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 313 (Commercial Industrial) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed staff to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2018/19 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. Expenditures Personnel Services Operations and Maintenance Total Expenditures Budget Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection Subtotal - Taxes Other Revenues Total Revenues Budget Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance Total District EBU Count Actual Assessment per EBU Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU Fiscal Year 2018/19 Budget $ 136,560 944,950 1,081,510 820,370 10,700 831,070 267,880 1,098,950 $ 17,440 2,935.99 $ 282.24 $ 352.80 Landscape Maintenance District No. 313 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#4 Page 323 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. 2. 1 have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, I certify that the Annual Engineer's Report and Assessment Diagram included herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B — City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#4 Page 324 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement or facility such as paseos, community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, and providing for the growth, vigor and care of the trees and landscape plant materials. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting of landscape or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the District for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally, describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the District by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the District. • Refers to the Engineer's Report, on file with the City Clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the City Clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B — City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#4 Page 325 conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including the improvements, to the zones within the District, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as the commercial and industrial area of the City which is generally bounded by Foothill Blvd on the north, 4th St on the South, East Ave on the east and Grove Ave on the west. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services These improvements are located within the street right-of-ways, Metrolink, and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, the pruning, fertilizing, mowing, weeding, pest control, removal of trash/debris, and irrigation of the trees, shrubs, vines, ground cover, and turf. Maintenance of associated improvements and facilities, such as community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, includes but is not limited to, grading and replacement of trail surfacing, trail fence repair and replacement, steel fence painting, repair and replacement, and irrigation systems control, adjustment, trouble -shooting, repair and replacement. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, capital projects and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective Landscape Maintenance District No. 313 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#4 Page 326 materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Site # Descriptive Location J-2 The monument at the northeast corner of Haven Ave and 4th St. Ground Cover area: 5,715 square feet Hardscape area: 6,068 square feet J-3 The 6th St median from Milliken Ave to Pittsburg Ave. Ground Cover area: 3,300 square feet J-4 The entry monuments on the east and west side of 4th St and Milliken Ave. The Milliken Ave median from 4th St to 6th St. Ground Cover area: 30,594 square feet Hardscape area: 1,748 square feet J-5 The Milliken Ave median from Arrow Rte to Jersey Blvd. Ground Cover area: 10,220 square feet J-6 The Spruce Ave median from Foothill Blvd to White Oak Ave. Ground Cover area: 4,300 square feet J-7 The 6th St median from Pittsburg Ave to Richmond PI. Ground Cover area: 5,114 square feet J-8 The 6th St from Richmond PI to Buffalo Ave. Ground Cover area: 2,476 square feet J-9 The Milliken Ave railroad underpass. Ground Cover area: 165,633 square feet, Turf area: 4,897 square feet J-10 The 6th St median from Cleveland Ave to 1,820 feet east of Cleveland Ave. Ground Cover area: 13,310 square feet J-11 The 6th St median from Buffalo Ave to Rochester Ave. Ground Cover area: 10,798 square feet J-12 The Milliken Ave median from Arrow Rte to Century Ct. Ground Cover area: 13,855 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B — City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#4 Page 327 J-13 The Milliken Ave median from Century Ct to Foothill Blvd. Ground Cover area: 3,330 square feet J-14 The 6th St median from Utica Ave to Cleveland Ave. Ground Cover area: 8,559 square feet J-15 The 6th St median from Haven Ave to Utica Ave. Ground Cover area: 7,680 square feet J-16 Day Creek Blvd median from Church St to Foothill Blvd. Ground Cover area: 8,466 square feet J-17 The Day Creek Blvd median south of Foothill Blvd including the traffic circle. Ground Cover area: 6,490 square feet H-1 The Haven Ave median from 4th St to 6th St. Ground Cover area: 21,205 square feet Converted 8,935 sq. ft. of turf to ground cover effective April 1, 2013. H-2 The Haven Ave medians from 6th St to the underpass bridge. The east and west side parkways and slopes on Haven Ave from Acacia St to underpass bridge. Ground Cover area: 54,720 square feet Converted 2,960 square feet of turf to ground cover effective April 1, 2013. H-3 The Haven Ave medians from underpass bridge to Arrow Rte. The east and west side parkways and slopes on Haven Ave from the underpass bridge to Jersey Blvd. Ground Cover area: 56,210 square feet H-4 The Haven Ave median from Arrow Rte to Foothill Blvd. Ground Cover area: 15,156 square feet H-5 The Haven Ave median from Foothill Blvd to Church St. Ground Cover area: 11,502 square feet FH -1 The Foothill Blvd median from Spruce Ave to Haven Ave. Ground Cover area: 4,571 square feet The total square footage for the improvement is 9,141; however, due to the location of the improvement the other half is maintained by landscape maintenance district 4-R. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B — City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#4 Page 328 FH -2 FH -3 FH -4 FH -5 The Foothill Blvd median from Spruce Ave to Milliken Ave. Ground Cover area: 7,940 square feet The total square footage for the improvement is 15,879; however, due to the location of the improvement the other half is maintained by landscape maintenance district 4-R. The Foothill Blvd median from 790 feet west of Market PI to Market PI Ground Cover area: 4,434 square feet The Foothill Blvd median from Market PI to Etiwanda Ave. Ground Cover area: 10,392 square feet The Foothill Blvd median from 360 feet west of Masi Dr to 516 feet west of Masi Dr. Ground Cover area: 800 square feet The total square footage for the improvement is 1,600; however, due to the location of the improvement the other half is maintained by landscape maintenance district 4-R. FH -6 The Foothill Blvd median from Masi Dr Plaza to Rochester Ave. Ground Cover area: 800 square feet The total square footage for the improvement is 1,600; however, due to the location of the improvement the other half is maintained by landscape maintenance district 4-R. FH -7 The Foothill Blvd median from Vineyard Ave to Orchard Plaza. Ground Cover area: 2,605 square feet FH -8 The Foothill Blvd median from Orchard Plaza to Lion St. Ground Cover area: 344 square feet FH -9 The Foothill Blvd median from Hellman Ave to Malachite Ave and from Malachite Ave to Archibald Ave. Ground Cover area: 21,474 square feet FH -10 The Foothill Blvd median from Archibald Ave to Ramona Ave. Ground Cover area: 4,770 square feet FH -11 The Foothill Blvd median from Ramona Ave to Hermosa Ave. Ground Cover area: 5,210 square feet FH -12 The Foothill Blvd median from Hermosa Ave to Center Ave. Ground Cover area: 6,329 square feet FH -13 The Foothill Blvd median from Center Ave to Haven Ave. Ground Cover area: 6,286 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B — City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#4 Page 329 FH -14 The Foothill Blvd median from Rochester Ave to 600 feet east of Rochester Ave. Ground Cover area: 1,356 square feet Site reduced to 5,979 square feet due to median renovation. FH -15 The Foothill Blvd median from 1,225 feet west of Day Creek Blvd to Day Creek Blvd. Ground Cover area: 4,905 square feet FH -16 The Foothill Blvd median from Day Creek Blvd to the 15 freeway. Ground Cover area: 9,808 square feet Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B — City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#4 Page 330 73�i�il�eiJi o . ,liol 11 ji�a � 1 � ii J �Igi9i% Grove Av 44i��Y I -C VinngsyerdAv g w Hellman Av I Archibald Av Hormosa Av Haven Av N j I JA I Milken Av L A �W rm r I V I N W • n Roc hostor Avi •� I Etiwanda Av yl I Av I J ------------- East 1 O = O O _ I IH 1 i • • cD m CD a r W oo' �' (D Cherry Av � � C (D V) 7D a � A � n . Qvnt9 i:m St � r i Hellman Ave I � Archibald Av I 1 Hormosa Av Haven Av ^� W n cD O Milliken Av (. I 1 � 1 Day Creek BI ; r I 1 1 1 ' ` Etiwanda Av 1 Wei 1 `W 1 1 _ . East Av ; I i i 1 r i t o I 0 < f 7 Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B — City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#4 Page 331 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the District levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Operations and Maintenance: Fiscal Year Operations and Maintenance: 2018/19 Budget Expenditures 500 Personnel Services: 15,700 Regular Salaries $ 75,330 Part-time Salaries 21,600 Fringe Benefits 39,630 Subtotal - Personnel 136,560 Operations and Maintenance: Operations and Maintenance: Computer Software 500 O & M/General 15,700 O & M/Facilities 11,500 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 27,700 Contract Services: Contract Services/General 525,660 Contract Services/Facilities 145,800 Tree Maintenance 26,210 Subtotal - Contract Services 697,670 Utilities: Telephone Utilities 760 Water Utilities 120,470 Electric Utilities 55,600 Subtotal - Utilities 176,830 Assessment Administration 5,580 Admin./General Overhead 37,170 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 944,950 Total Expenditures Budget $ 1,081,510 Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B — City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#4 Page 332 Fiscal Year 2018/19 Budget Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies $ 820,370 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 10,700 Subtotal - Taxes 831,070 Other Revenues: Interest Earnings Parking Permits Other Revenue Subtotal - Other Revenues: Total Revenues Budget Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance 27,540 240,000 340 267,880 $ 1,098,950 $ 17,440 Total Gross Estimated Assessments $ 828,653.66 Total District EBU Count 2,935.99 Actual Assessment per EBU - Fiscal Year 2018/19 $ 282.24 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU - Fiscal Year 2018/19 $ 352.80 The maximum allowable assessment per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in Fiscal Year 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however, it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2018 Contribution to Reserve - Fiscal Year 2018/19 Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2019 Operating Reserve $ 1,862,766 17,440 $ 1,880,206 Landscape Maintenance District No. 313 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#4 Page 333 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time and part-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Additionally, this includes benefits available to City employees. Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District. Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Utilities: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity, water, and telephone services, as required, for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers in the District. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost of all particular departments and staff of the City, as well as consultants, for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual Engineer's Report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all central services departments of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational District within the City's administrative structure. Capital Outlay: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Other Revenues: This includes other revenues that are not levied through the annual assessments that support the District operations. These other revenues may include: interest earnings, other rental/lease income (cell site tower leases), Park Maintenance Fees, Sports Field User Group Rentals, and parking permits (Metrolink Station paid parking). Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B — City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#4 Page 334 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Overview Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 commencing with Section 5000) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]. Section 22547 of the 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement". Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIIID also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights -of -ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B — City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#4 Page 335 General Benefit Section 4 of Article XIII D of the California Constitution provides that once a local agency which proposes to impose assessments on property has identified those parcels that will have special benefits conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed, the local agency must next "separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred," and only the special benefits can be included in the amount of the assessments imposed. In this District, the improvements being financed consists of the maintenance of local improvements located within the boundaries of the District and include paseos, street trees, landscaped areas and appurtenant facilities that are located throughout the District and were installed to create a common landscape theme and neighborhood identity for parcels within the District. The improvements are situated within the public rights-of-way of the internal local street network within the District which provides ingress and egress for parcels within the District to access the City's system of arterial streets. Traffic from parcels not within the District do not use the internal local street network or paseos except for the express purpose of accessing properties located within the District, and therefore do not benefit from the improvements. Only parcels which are within the District and proximate to the improvements and within the District are being assessed. Accordingly, there is a direct physical and visual nexus between each parcel being assessed and the improvements to be funded by the assessment that does not exist for parcels outside of the District boundary and that is particular and distinct from that shared by the public at large. Under these circumstances, all of the benefits conferred are direct and local in nature, and provide a benefit to only those parcels located within the boundaries of the District. Based upon this, it has been determined that there is no quantifiable general benefit to the surrounding community and the public in general from the maintenance of the improvements within the boundaries of the District, and therefore no portion of the project costs should be attributed to general benefit. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District and, as such, confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B — City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#4 Page 336 share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District, only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements is identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined, however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since Fiscal Year 1996/97. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The EBU method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one EBU. Every other land -use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land -use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land -use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land -Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Property Type (County Use Code) EBU Value er MEAcre Non -Residential 1.00 The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B — City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#4 Page 337 assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2018/19 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the San Bernardino County Assessor Office, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B — City of Rancho Cucamonga 16 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#4 Page 338 Maximum Allowable Actual Assessment Asessment Rate Total Property Type (County Use Code) Rate per EBU per EBU Units/Acres Total EBUs Non -Residential $352.80 $282.24 2,935.99 2,935.99 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the San Bernardino County Assessor Office, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B — City of Rancho Cucamonga 16 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#4 Page 338 'ytA i'i �e�67gi D o '2"q¢�yKSs W N o ° Q co D o W �&:F4 = Q fn U) O 0 3 �A7�8 AYA (n Grove Av W m CO ;9s&�4i9eg n 'zi9�a4449 g'4 Vineyard Av rn A S :R: � Hellman Av Archibald Av Hermosa Av Haven Av Milliken Av J CD 1 ci n r.J Rochester Av j Rochester Av w L........ d-6-- —.Day i W DayCreek B Etiwanda Av Etivianda Av s T East Av Cherry Av W v 0 r m a Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B — City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2018/19 Carnelian St I Hellman Av Archibald Av Hermosa Av Haven Av I Milliken Av r y a cD rui CD 1 CD C) n f►F. W 17 ATTACHMENT#4 Page 339 D o o ° S O ZJ W J CD ci n O w r W � U, Cherry Av W v 0 r m a Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B — City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2018/19 Carnelian St I Hellman Av Archibald Av Hermosa Av Haven Av I Milliken Av r y a cD rui CD 1 CD C) n f►F. W 17 ATTACHMENT#4 Page 339 ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2018/19 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2018/19 actual assessment for the District: A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations The following annexations are effective for Fiscal Year 2018/19: Apn Actual Project Name Total Units/ Acres Total EBUs Property Type Assessment Total PM19474 2.97 Property Type (County Use Code) Rate per EBU Units/Acres Total EBUs Total Assessment Non -Residential $282.24 2,935.99 2,935.99 $828,653.66 Totals 3.66 2,935.991 2,935.99 $828,653.66 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations The following annexations are effective for Fiscal Year 2018/19: Apn Annexation Date Project Name Total Units/ Acres Total EBUs Property Type 0210-081-13 02/01/17 PM19474 2.97 2.97 CO/IND 1077-601-13 & 14 05/03/17 DRC2016-00006 4.58 4.58 CO/IND 0229-141-06 & 07 08/16/17 DRC2016-00270 3.66 3.66 CO/IND 0209-211-41 10/04/17 DRC2016-00522 4.77 4.77 CO/IND 0209-032-28 & 29 1 12/06/17 1 DRC2016-00695 7.51 1 7.51 1 CO/IND Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B — City of Rancho Cucamonga 18 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#4 Page 340 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2018/19 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R (Terra Vista Planned Community) Page 341 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4-R (TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2700 Fax: 909.477.2849 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Lynne B. Kennedy, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Sam Spagnolo, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director Page 342 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER 1 INTRODUCTION 3 Reason for Assessment 3 Process for Annual Assessment 3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 4 Description of the Boundaries of the District 4 Description of Improvements and Services 4 Map of Improvements 13 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 15 District Budget 15 Definitions of Budget Items 17 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 18 Overview 18 General Benefit 19 Special Benefit 19 Method of Assessment Spread 20 Cost of Living Inflator 22 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM 22 ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS 24 Assessment Roll 24 Annexations 24 Page 343 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July 18, 2018, the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 18-053, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R (Terra Vista Planned Community) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed staff to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2018/19 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. Fiscal Year 2018/19 Budget Expenditures Personnel Services $ 1,030,020 Operations and Maintenance 1,309,850 Capital Expenditures 446,000 Total Expenditures Budget 2,785,870 Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies 2,713,340 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 13,750 Subtotal - Taxes 2,727,090 Other Revenues 72,690 Total Revenues Budget 2,799,780 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ 13,910 Total District EBU Count 6,901.03 Actual Assessment per EBU $ 397.15 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU $ 444.42 Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R — City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#5 Page 344 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. 2. 1 have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, I certify that the Annual Engineer's Report and Assessment Diagram included herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R — City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#5 Page 345 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement or facility such as paseos, community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, and providing for the growth, vigor and care of the trees and landscape plant materials. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting of landscape or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the District for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally, describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the District by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the District. • Refers to the Engineer's Report, on file with the City Clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the City Clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R — City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#5 Page 346 conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including the improvements, to the zones within the District, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area located north of Foothill Blvd, west of Rochester Ave, east of Haven Ave, south of Base Line Rd and includes the northeast corner of Base Line Rd and Haven Ave. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of the paseos, parkways, median islands, street trees, parks, landscaped sites and appurtenant facilities that are throughout the District. These improvements are located within the street right-of-ways and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, the pruning, fertilizing, mowing, weeding, pest control, removal of trash/debris, and irrigation of the trees, shrubs, vines, ground cover, and turf. Maintenance of associated improvements and facilities, such as community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, includes but is not limited to, grading and replacement of trail surfacing, trail fence repair and replacement, steel fence painting, repair and replacement, and irrigation systems control, adjustment, trouble- shooting, repair and replacement. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, capital projects and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R — City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#5 Page 347 and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Parks: Spruce Park, Mountain View Park, Ralph M. Lewis Park, Coyote Canyon Park, Milliken Park and West Greenway Park The street trees within the residential parkways and tree maintenance easements to be maintained by the District are on the following streets, located within the boundaries of the District: Amiata Dr Bastia Ct Blackhorse Ct Brandywine PI Bunker Hill Dr Cedarbrook PI Chesterton Dr Clarisa PI Corsica Ct (Country View Dr to Milliken Ave) Country View Dr (Mountain View Dr to Palacio Ct) Covington PI Danbury Dr Danner Ct De Anza Dr Derby PI Downing Ct Ellena East & West (s/o Terra Vista Pkwy to Fitzpatrick Dr) Emery PI Fitzpatrick Dr Fulbourn Ct Hinton Ct Linaro Rd The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Meyers Dr Potomac Ct Radcliff PI Regent Dr Rockingham Ct Saranza PI Southhampton Ct Terra Vista Pkwy (Church St to Brandywine PI) Wellington PI Yorktown Ct Site # Descriptive Location TV -1 The Base Line Rd median from Haven Ave to the Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 23,345 square feet Turf area: 16,545 square feet Hardscape area: 10,630 square feet TV -2 The Base Line Rd median from Spruce Ave to the Deer Creek Channel Ground Cover area: 18,863 square feet Turf area: 15,067 square feet Hardscape area: 12,575 square feet TV -3 The Base Line Rd median from Spruce Ave to Milliken Ave. Ground Cover area: 16,670 square feet Turf area: 14,857 square feet Hardscape area: 16,567 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R — City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#5 Page 348 TV -4 The south side of Base Line Rd from 800 feet east of Spruce Ave to Milliken Ave. The cul-de-sac at the north end of Cascade Ct. Ground Cover area: 16,613 square feet Turf Cover area: 5,324 square feet Hardscape area: 7,950 square feet TV -5 The north side of Terra Vista Pkwy from Belpine PI to 112 feet west of Butterfield PI; Terra Vista Pkwy median from Spruce Ave to Milliken Ave and the south side of Terra Vista Pkwy from 164 feet west of Belpine PI to Belpine PI. Ground Cover area: 19,738 square feet Turf area: 2,675 square feet Hardscape area: 13,328 square feet TV -6 The north side of from Spruce Ave to 175 feet north of Countryside Dr and Terra Vista Pkwy median from Church St to Spruce Ave. Ground Cover area: 22,959 square feet Turf area: 6,195 square feet Hardscape area: 11,702 square feet TV -7 The north side of Church St from the west side of Deer Creek Channel to Terra Vista Pkwy. The west side of Terra Vista Pkwy from Church St to 175 feet north of Countryside Dr. Ground Cover area: 9,924 square feet Turf area: 5,378 square feet Hardscape area: 6,426 square feet TV -8 The southeast corner of Church St and Haven Ave; the Church St median from Haven Ave to Terra Vista Pkwy and the wash end on the Northwest corner of the Deer Creek Channel and Church St. Ground Cover area: 26,876 square feet Hardscape area: 2,306 square feet Hardscape area: 2,788 square feet TV -9 The Church St median from Terra Vista Pkwy to Spruce Ave. Ground Cover area: 7,829 square feet Hardscape area: 6,605 square feet TV -10 The east side of Valencia Ave from Base Line Rd to the pre-school; the south side of Augusta Dr from Valencia Ave to Meadowlark PI and the west side of Summerfield PI from Valencia Ave to Evergreen Dr. Ground Cover area: 20,818 square feet Turf area: 18,634 square feet Hardscape area: 8,666 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R — City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#5 Page 349 TV -11 TV -12 The paseo at Parkside PI and Clover Ct from Parkside PI to the Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 2,795 square feet Hardscape area: 1,049 square feet The east side of Haven Ave from the pre-school to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground Cover area: Turf area: Hardscape area: 6,170 square feet 2,091 square feet 1,060 square feet TV -13 The east side of Spruce Ave from Elm Ave to Mountain View Dr; the north and south sides of Norfolk Dr from Spruce Ave to Cardiff PI; the south side of Mountain View Dr from Spruce Ave to 290 feet east of Belvedere PI and the paseo from Spruce Ave to Country View Dr. Ground Cover area: 8,459 square feet Turf area: 3,355 square feet Hardscape area: 8,886 square feet TV -14 The south side of Mountain View Dr from 290 feet east of Belvedere PI to 590 feet east of Fairhaven PI; the paseo south of Mountain View Dr between Belvedere PI and Fairhaven PI to Country View Dr and from Country View Dr to West Greenway Corridor. Ground Cover area: 19,030 square feet Turf area: 8,430 square feet Hardscape area: 9,262 square feet TV -15 The north side of Mountain View Dr from 634 feet west of Biarritz PI to Milliken Ave. Ground Cover area: 4,571 square feet Turf area: 4,738 square feet Hardscape area: 5,104 square feet TV -16 The West Greenway Corridor from the northeast corner of Elm Ave and Spruce Ave to West Greenway Corridor. Ground Cover area: 15,529 square feet Turf area: 20,884 square feet Hardscape area: 20,626 square feet TV -17 The west side of Milliken Ave from 585 feet north of Mountain View Dr to Mountain View Dr. Ground Cover area: 5,835 square feet Turf area: 3,564 square feet Hardscape area: 2,340 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R — City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#5 Page 350 TV -18 The south side of Mountain View Dr from approximately 250 feet west of Claridge PI to Terra Vista Pkwy. The south side of Terra Vista Pkwy from Mountain View Dr to East Greenway Corridor. Terra Vista Pkwy from Mountain View Dr to East Greenway Corridor. Ground Cover area: 18,316 square feet Turf area: 5,944 square feet Hardscape area: 23,800 square feet TV -19 The Terra Vista Pkwy median from Milliken Ave to Mountain View Dr. The north side of Terra Vista Pkwy from 68 feet north of Addison Rd to Mountain View Dr. The west side of Mountain View Dr from Grapevine St to Terra Vista Pkwy. Ground Cover area: 20,306 square feet Turf area: 3,886 square feet Hardscape area: 11,478 square feet TV -20 The Church St median from Milliken Ave to 675 feet east of Milliken Ave. Ground Cover area: 2,860 square feet Hardscape area: 2,112 square feet TV -21 The Church St median from Milliken Ave to Spruce Ave. Ground Cover area: 16,811 square feet Turf area: 335 square feet Hardscape area: 14,880 square feet TV -22 The Milliken Ave median from Mountain View Dr to Foothill Blvd. Ground Cover area: 16,436 square feet Hardscape area: 16,267 square feet TV -23 The Milliken Ave underpass from West Greenway Park to Milliken Park. Ground Cover area: 19,271 square feet Turf area: 22,139 square feet Hardscape area: 18,119 square feet TV -24 The east side of Haven Ave from 145 feet south of Creekbridge St to 600 feet north of Creekbridge St; the north side of Creekbridge St from Brookside Rd to Haven Ave and the paseo from Creekbridge St and Brookside Rd to the Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 5,851 square feet Turf area: 9,965 square feet Hardscape area: 4,351 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R — City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#5 Page 351 TV -25 The east side of Haven Ave form 145 feet south of Creekbridge St to 410 feet south of Creekbridge St. Ground Cover area: 3,319 square feet Turf area: 1,677 square feet Hardscape area: 1,779 square feet TV -26 The paseo at Plymouth Way south of Essex PI from Plymouth Way to the Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 1,956 square feet Hardscape area: 2,385 square feet TV -27 The paseo from Terra Vista Pkwy to Windsong PI and from Windsong PI to Plymouth Way. Ground Cover area: 2,270 square feet Turf area: 2,731 square feet Hardscape area: 3,332 square feet TV -28 The paseo on the north side of 7552 Hardy Ave. Ground Cover area: 630 square feet Turf area: 733 square feet Hardscape area: 432 square feet TV -29 The East Greenway Corridor from Milliken Park to Terra Vista Pkwy, including the turf area at the entrance to Tract 16157. Ground Cover area: 17,780 square feet Turf area: 52,403 square feet Hardscape area: 29,888 square feet TV -30 The Milliken Ave Median from Mountain View Dr to Base Line Rd. Ground Cover area: 11,890 square feet Hardscape area: 10,260 square feet TV -31 The paseo from Elm Ave to West Greenway Park. Ground Cover area: 4,770 square feet Hardscape area: 8,900 square feet TV -32 The Greenwich PI paseo from Greenwich PI to Muirfield Dr. Ground Cover area: 1,323 square feet Hardscape area: 1,456 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R — City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#5 Page 352 TV -33 The south side of Mountain View Dr from 430 feet west of Country View Dr to Country View Dr. Ground Cover area: 3,434 square feet Turf area: 1,853 square feet Hardscape area: 1,720 square feet TV -34 The south side of Terra Vista Pkwy from 390 feet west of Belpine PI to Belpine PI. Ground Cover area: 1,342 square feet Turf area: 1,887 square feet Hardscape area: 1,612 square feet TV -35 The Trail Northeast of Ruth Musser School from Terra Vista Pkwy to Spruce Ave. Ground Cover area: 9,285 square feet Hardscape area: 5,148 square feet TV -36 The east side of Country View Dr from Corsica Ct to Mountain View Dr. The south side of Mountain View Dr from Country View Dr to Milliken Ave. The west side of Milliken Ave from Mountain View Dr to the West Greenway Corridor. Ground Cover area: 9,141 square feet Turf area: 5,895 square feet Hardscape area: 6,058 square feet TV -37 The north side of Meyers Dr from Emery PI to Elm Ave. Ground Cover area: 5,860 square feet Turf area: 5,300 square feet Hardscape area: 1,283 square feet TV -38 The Church St median from Rochester Ave to Terra Vista Pkwy median from Church St to 853 feet north of Church St. Ground Cover area: 8,510 square feet Hardscape area: 5,640 square feet TV -39 The north side of Mountain View Dr form 250 feet east of Milliken Ave to Milliken Ave. The east side of Milliken Ave from Mountain View Dr to Terra Vista Pkwy. Ground Cover area: 16,751 square feet Hardscape area: 15,716 square feet TV -40 The south side of Terra Vista Pkwy from Milliken Ave to Mountain View Dr. Ground Cover area: 11,630 square feet Hardscape area: 19,738 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R — City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#5 Page 353 TV -41 The paseo east of Milliken Ave from Terra Vista Pkwy south to Mountain View Dr. Ground Cover area: 4,081 square feet Hardscape area: 9,640 square feet TV -42 The north side of Mountain View Dr from Terra Vista Pkwy to 250 feet east of Milliken Ave. Ground Cover area: 10,994 square feet Hardscape area: 14,777 square feet TV -43 Church St median and parkway from Malaga Dr to Terra Vista Pkwy. Ground Cover area: 7,506 square feet Hardscape area: 3,955 square feet TV -44 The south side of Church St from Terra Vista Pkwy to Rochester Ave. Ground Cover area: 10,400 square feet Hardscape area: 7,606 square feet TV -45 The west side of Rochester Ave from Church St to Malaga Dr. Ground cover area: 20,693 square feet Hardscape area: 12,450 square feet TV -46 The north side of Malaga Dr from Church St to Rochester Ave. Ground Cover area: 19,843 square feet Hardscape area: 18,000 square feet TV -47 The east side of Terra Vista Pkwy from Church St to Brandywine PI. The paseo from Brandywine PI to Bunker Hill Dr. The east side of Radcliff PI from Bunker Hill Dr to Malaga Dr. Ground Cover area: 17,838 square feet Hardscape area: 9,023 square feet TV -48 The Church St median from 750 feet east of Milliken Ave to Malaga Dr. Ground Cover area: 5,554 square feet Hardscape area: 9,698 square feet FH -1 The Foothill Blvd median from Spruce Ave to Haven Ave. Ground Cover area: 4,571 square feet The total square footage for the improvement is 9,141; however, due to the location of the improvement the other half is maintained by Landscape Maintenance District 3B. Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R — City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#5 Page 354 FH -2 The Foothill Blvd median from Spruce Ave to Haven Ave. Ground Cover area: 7,940 square feet The total square footage for the improvement is 15,879; however, due to the location of the improvement the other half is maintained by Landscape Maintenance District 3B. FH -5 The Foothill Blvd median from 360 feet west of Masi Dr to 516 feet west of Masi Dr. Ground Cover area: 800 square feet The total square footage for the improvement is 1,600; however, due to the location of the improvement the other half is maintained by Landscape Maintenance District 3B. FH -6 The Foothill Blvd median from Masi Dr Plaza to Rochester Ave. Ground Cover area: 800 square feet The total square footage for the improvement is 1,600; however, due to the location of the improvement the other half is maintained by Landscape Maintenance District 3B. H-5 The Haven Ave median from Foothill Blvd to Church St. Ground Cover area: 11,502 square feet Converted 10,572 sq ft of turf to ground cover effective April 1, 2013. Area listed is the 50% maintained by the District. An equal amount is maintained by Landscape Maintenance District 3B. H-6 Haven Ave median from Church St to Base Line Rd. Ground Cover area: 9,615 square feet Converted 8,708 sq. ft. of turf to ground cover effective April 1, 2013. Area listed is the 50% maintained by the District. An equal amount is maintained by the City's General Fund. H-7 The Haven Ave median from Base Line Rd to Southern Pacific railroad tracks. Ground Cover area: 3,130 square feet Converted 3,992 sq. ft. of turf to ground cover effective April 1, 2013. Removed 3,692 sq. ft. of ground cover for turn pocket expansion. Area listed is the 50% maintained by the District. An equal amount is maintained by the City's General Fund. VG -14 The Base Line Rd median from Milliken Ave to Ellena East. The turf and ground cover on the north side of Base Line Rd from Ellena East to Ellena West. The turf and ground cover on the east side of Ellena West from Base Line Rd and following the curb line to Kenyon Way. The north side of Ellena West from Kenyon Way to Casoli PI. The turf and ground cover on both sides of Casoli PI from Ellena West to Candela Dr. The turf and ground cover on both sides of Crema PI from Ellena West to Candela Dr. Ground Cover area: 9,169 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R — City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#5 Page 355 The improvements for Ground Cover are 80,287, Turf improves are 62,999 square feet, and Hardscape improvements are 44,826; however, due to the location of the improvements, the District maintains only the south side of the Base Line Rd median from Milliken Ave to Ellena East and the rest is maintained by Landscape Maintenance District 2. VG -15 The turf and ground cover on the west side of Rochester Ave from the Southern Pacific Railroad to Base Line Rd. The turf and ground cover on the north side of Base Line Rd from Rochester Ave to Ellena East. The Base Line Rd Median from Rochester Ave to Ellena East. The turf and ground cover on the east side of Ellena East from Base Line Rd and continuing along that curb line to 275 feet north of Berra Rd. The turf and ground cover on both sides of Berra Rd from Ellena East to Comiso Way. Ground Cover area: 3,960 square feet The improvements for Ground Cover are 58,887, Turf improves are 57,306 square feet, and Hardscape improvements are 36,014; however, due to the location of the improvements, the District maintains only the south side of the Base Line Rd median from Rochester Ave to Ellena East and the rest is maintained by Landscape Maintenance District 2. Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R — City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#5 Page 356 MillikenAv O 5 - CD 41 • A � 7 I Y��_ Rochester Av -J ./ v(D C) (D v (A Q% — i Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R — City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#5 Page 357 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the District levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Page 358 Fiscal Year 2018/19 Budget Expenditures Personnel Services: Regular Salaries $ 662,520 Overtime Salaries 1,050 Part-time Salaries 47,280 Fringe Benefits 319,170 Subtotal - Personnel 1,030,020 Operations and Maintenance: Operations and Maintenance: O & M/General 99,750 Vehicle Operations and Maintenance 6,000 Emergency Equipment and Vehicle Rental 1,700 Emergency Operations & Maintenance 3,750 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 111,200 Contract Services: Contract Services/General 501,340 Tree Maintenance 74,970 Subtotal - Contract Services 576,310 Utilities: Water Utilities 342,470 Electric Utilities 32,500 Subtotal - Utilities 374,970 Assessment Administration 18,770 Adm in./General Overhead 228,600 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 1,309,850 Capital Expenditures: Captial Outlay - Equipment 6,000 Captial Project 440,000 Subtotal - Capital Expenditures 446,000 Total Expenditures Budget $ 2,785,870 Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R — City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#5 Page 358 Fiscal Year 2018/19 Budget Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies $ 2,713,340 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 13,750 Subtotal - Taxes 2,727,090 Other Revenues: Interest Earnings Park Maintenance Fees Sports Field User Group Rentals Subtotal - Other Revenues: Total Revenues Budget Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance 70,110 2,080 500 72,690 $ 2,799,780 $ 13,910 Total Gross Estimated Assessments $ 2,740,764.81 Total District EBU Count 6,901.03 Actual Assessment per EBU - Fiscal Year 2018/19 $ 397.15 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU - Fiscal Year 2018/19 $ 444.42 The maximum allowable assessment per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved when the property owners on December 2, 2009, voted in favor of a Prop 218 assessment ballot increase with an allowable annual increase by the lesser of 3.5% or the percentage change in the year ending February preceding the start of the Fiscal Year of the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (CPI -U) and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however, it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Operating Reserve Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2018 $ 5,483,528 Contribution to Reserve - Fiscal Year 2018/19 13,910 Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2019 $ 5,497,438 Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R — City of Rancho Cucamonga 16 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#5 Page 359 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time and part-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Additionally, this includes benefits available to City employees. Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District. Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Utilities: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity, water, and telephone services, as required, for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers in the District. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost of all particular departments and staff of the City, as well as consultants, for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual Engineer's Report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all central services departments of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational District within the City's administrative structure. Capital Outlay: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Other Revenues: This includes other revenues that are not levied through the annual assessments that support the District operations. These other revenues may include: interest earnings, other rental/lease income (cell site tower leases), Park Maintenance Fees, Sports Field User Group Rentals, and parking permits (Metrolink Station paid parking). Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R — City of Rancho Cucamonga 17 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#5 Page 360 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Overview Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 commencing with Section 5000) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]. Section 22547 of the 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement." Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights -of -ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R — City of Rancho Cucamonga 18 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#5 Page 361 General Benefit Section 4 of Article XIII D of the California Constitution provides that once a local agency which proposes to impose assessments on property has identified those parcels that will have special benefits conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed, the local agency must next "separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred," and only the special benefits can be included in the amount of the assessments imposed. In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are incidental general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the control of dust and insect infestations, and • the visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District. However, it has been determined that these benefits are incidental and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the District that are not being assessed. Any incidental benefit received by parcels outside of the District is further offset by the incidental benefit received by parcels within the District from the maintenance of landscaping improvements by the other assessment districts within the City. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District and, as such, confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District, only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R — City of Rancho Cucamonga 19 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#5 Page 362 Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements is identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined. On December 2, 2009, Proposition 218 assessment ballot increase was approved by the property owners in this District. Therefore, all parcels included in the District boundary, are being levied in accordance with Article XIII D and Proposition 218. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The EBU method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment since there is a total of 2,651 single family parcels within the District which represents 69.1 percent of the total assessable parcels within the District. A method has been developed to convert other land uses to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land - use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family residential parcel. Other residential land uses are assigned Equivalent Dwelling Units (EDU) in proportion to the number of trips generated and average number of occupants per dwelling unit in comparison to the typical single family parcel. Based upon the trip generation data from the ITE Trip Generation Report, San Diego Association of Governments' Guide to Vehicular Traffic Generation Rates which have been adopted by San Bernardino County Transpiration Authority (formerly known as San Bernardino Associated Governments) and the most recent census data for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, condominiums are assigned 0.8 EDU's since the number of residents and number of trips generated per dwelling unit are 80 percent of the typical single family residence. Multi -family residential units are assigned 0.70 EDU's per dwelling unit since the number of residents and number of trips generated per multifamily residential unit are 70 percent of the typical single family residential unit. This reduction is further supported by virtue of the fact that both condominium developments and multi -family residential development have a higher level of landscaping that reduce the benefit received by these parcels from District maintained landscaping. EBU's are assigned to Commercial and Industrial parcels based upon the number of trips generated as well. The ITE Trip Generation Report shows that non-residential uses similar to those found in the District generate from 30 to 400 plus trips per day based upon the specific land use. An average trip generation rate of 135 trips per day was used since the non-residential uses within the district are generally those that result in fewer trips per day per acre, when compared Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R — City of Rancho Cucamonga 20 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#5 Page 363 to more intense non-residential uses such as community shopping centers which can generate in excess of 500 trips per day. Based upon an average density of approximately 9 single family residential units per acre and a trip generation rate of 10 trips per day for a typical single family residential unit, the trip generation rate for commercial and industrial parcels is approximately 1.5 times that of an acre developed for single family residential use based upon an average of 135 trips per acre for non-residential uses. The trips generated by non-residential uses has been reduced by approximately 40 percent to account for the number of "pass -by" trips which are those trips which stop at non-residential parcels enroute to/from residential parcels. This reduces the trips generated per acre from 135 to 81. Since non-residential parcels do not receive a significant special benefit from the park facilities maintained by the District, the number of trips generated per acre has been further reduced in proportion to the ratio of expenditures for landscape maintenance versus park maintenance within the District, which has been estimated by the City to be 60% parks and 40% landscaping. Therefore, commercial and industrial parcels have been assigned a value of 3.25 EBU's per acre to represent the special benefit received by those parcels relative to the typical single family residential parcel. Vacant parcels are assigned an EBU value of 0.25 per acre because they receive a lesser benefit from the improvements until such time as development occurs. Publicly owned school parcels are also assigned an EBU value of 0.25 per acre in recognition of the limited benefit they receive from the improvements maintained by the District and the benefit conferred upon other parcels within the District by the open space and landscaping maintained by the School District on their parcels which might be used by properties within the District under joint use agreements between the School District and the City. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land -use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land -Use Equivalent Benefit Units Property Type (County Use Code) EBU Value Multiplier Single Family Residential 1.00 Parcel Condominium 0.80 Unit Multi -Family Residential 0.70 Unit Commercial/Industrial 3.25 Acre Vacant (incl. all undevelped property) 0.25 Acre Schools 0.25 Acre The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R — City of Rancho Cucamonga 21 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#5 Page 364 based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2018/19 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Property Type (County Use Code) Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate per EBU Actual Asessment Rate per EBU Total Units/Acres Total EBUs Single Family Residential $444.42 $397.15 2,652.00 2,652.00 Condominium 444.42 397.15 1,227.00 981.60 Multi -Family Residential 444.42 397.15 3,809.00 2,666.30 Commercial/Industrial 444.42 397.15 176.41 573.33 Vacant (incl. all undevelped property) 444.42 397.15 75.79 18.95 Schools 444.42 397.15 35.41 8.85 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Cost of Living Inflator Each fiscal year beginning Fiscal Year 2010/11, the maximum allowable assessment amount may be increased by the lesser of 3.5% or the percentage change in the year ending February preceding the start of the Fiscal Year of the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (CPI -U), for the Los Angeles -Riverside -Orange County area. If for any reason the percentage change is negative the maximum allowable assessment would not be decreased by reason of such negative percentage change and would remain at the amount as computed on the previous fiscal year regardless of any CPI adjustment. The annual assessment cannot exceed the actual costs to operate the District in any given year. If operating costs are such that the maximum assessment amount is not needed, the City would levy only what is needed for that year. The actual assessment rate for Fiscal Year 2018/19 will remain at $397.15 per single family residence. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the San Bernardino County Assessor Office, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R — City of Rancho Cucamonga 22 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#5 Page 365 �'�9A8di4 �3�8 gala Snna Si� i�agoa p� AAga`i� a 14i �a�n� 3s?Y8 i 4y°a D 0 } O Kjail 5�4n3. ;iK 33 in .Zl QJ A gaa#-agar Grove Av Vineyarnrd Av Q .40 Hellman Av Archibald Av Hermosa Av Haven Av Milliken Av Rochester Av Etiwanda Av I I A S East Av 0 cn 0 00 0 N r m W v m E 9' m a Cherry Av — A Carnelian St i Hellman Av I i i Archibald Av Hermosa Av Haven Av --.—.G_.._.._.._.._.i Milliken Av Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R — City of Rancho Cucamonga 23 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#5 Page 366 Rochester Av ..................... Day.Creek BI 0 I 1 (D Etiwanda Avi i I 1 �y. 1 I .............. (fl v o y. D n Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R — City of Rancho Cucamonga 23 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#5 Page 366 ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2018/19 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2018/19 actual assessments for the District: Property Type (County Use Code) Actual Assessment Rate per EBU Total Units/Acres Total EBUs Total Assessment Single Family Residential $397.15 2,652.00 2,652.00 $1,053,241.80 Condominium 397.15 1,227.00 981.60 389,842.44 Multi -Family Residential 397.15 3,809.00 2,666.30 1,058,940.09 Commercial/Industrial 397.15 176.41 573.33 227,699.44 Vacant (incl. all undevelped property) 397.15 75.79 18.95 7,525.19 Schools 397.15 35.41 8.85 3,515.85 Totals 1 7,975.61 6,901.03 $2,740,764.81 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations There were no effective annexations for Fiscal Year 2018/19. Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R — City of Rancho Cucamonga 24 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#5 Page 367 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2018/19 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 (Andover) Page 368 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 5 (ANDOVER) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2700 Fax: 909.477.2849 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Lynne B. Kennedy, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Sam Spagnolo, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director Page 369 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER 1 INTRODUCTION 3 Reason for Assessment 3 Process for Annual Assessment 3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 4 Description of the Boundaries of the District 4 Description of Improvements and Services 4 Map of Improvements 5 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 7 District Budget 7 Definitions of Budget Items 9 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 10 Overview 10 General Benefit 11 Special Benefit 11 Method of Assessment Spread 12 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM 13 ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS 15 Assessment Roll 15 Annexations 15 Page 370 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July 18, 2018, the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 18-053, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 (Andover) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed staff to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2018/19 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#6 Page 371 Fiscal Year 2018/19 Budget Expenditures Personnel Services $ 3,730 Operations and Maintenance 5,350 Total Expenditures Budget 9,080 Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies 2,470 Other Revenues 530 Total Revenues Budget 3,000 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ (6,080) Total District EBU Count 44.00 Actual Assessment per EBU $ 56.65 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU $ 113.29 Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#6 Page 371 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. 2. 1 have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, I certify that the Annual Engineer's Report and Assessment Diagram included herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#6 Page 372 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement or facility such as paseos, community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, and providing for the growth, vigor and care of the trees and landscape plant materials. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting of landscape or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the District for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the District by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the District. • Refers to the Engineer's Report, on file with the City Clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the City Clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#6 Page 373 conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including the improvements, to the zones within the District, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing, must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to, the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area of the City bounded by Hermosa Ave on the west, 26th St on the south, the parcels north of and along Bedford Dr and the parcels west of and along Andover PI. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services These improvements are located within the street right-of-ways and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, the pruning, fertilizing, mowing, weeding, pest control, removal of trash/debris, and irrigation of the trees, shrubs, vines, ground cover, and turf. Maintenance of associated improvements and facilities, such as community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, includes but is not limited to, grading and replacement of trail surfacing, trail fence repair and replacement, steel fence painting, repair and replacement, and irrigation systems control, adjustment, trouble- shooting, repair and replacement. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, capital projects and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#6 Page 374 ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Parks: Andover Tot Lot. Site # Descriptive Location 1-1-5 The Andover PI playground on the southwest corner of Andover PI and Bedford Dr. Ground Cover area: Turf area: Hardscape area: 1,506 square feet 1,070 square feet 640 square feet Andover and landscaping are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crews. Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#6 Page 375 o n � a gfg o ca�ii.� i ° o t) Hennosa Av oil 1.11,1im, a1 i `� fy n I n L-11 IL I • CD --i C o0)=, ,0 (D � r � m 7 Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#6 Page 376 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the District levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#6 Page 377 Fiscal Year 2018/19 Budget Expenditures Personnel Services: Regular Salaries $ 1,850 Part-time Salaries 840 Fringe Benefits 1,040 Subtotal - Personnel 3,730 Operations and Maintenance: Operations and Maintenance: O & M/General 1,300 Vehicle Operations and Maintenance 70 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 1,370 Contract Services: Contract Services/General 1,590 Utilities: Water Utilities 800 Electric Utilities 490 Subtotal - Utilities 1,290 Assessment Administration 220 Admin./General Overhead 880 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 5,350 Total Expenditures Budget $ 9,080 Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#6 Page 377 Fiscal Year 2018/19 Budget Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies $ 2,470 Other Revenues: Interest Earnings 530 Total Revenues Budget $ 3,000 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ (6,080) Total Gross Estimated Assessments $ 2,492.60 Total District EBU Count 44.00 Actual Assessment per EBU - Fiscal Year 2018/19 $ 56.65 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU - Fiscal Year 2018/19 $ 113.29 The maximum allowable assessment per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in Fiscal Year 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however, it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Operating Reserve Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2018 $ 32,275 Contribution to Reserve - Fiscal Year 2018/19 (6,080) Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2019 $ 26,195 Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#6 Page 378 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time and part-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Additionally, this includes benefits available to City employees. Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District. Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Utilities: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity, water, and telephone services, as required, for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers in the District. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost of all particular departments and staff of the City, as well as consultants, for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual Engineer's Report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all central services departments of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational District within the City's administrative structure. Capital Outlay: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Other Revenues: This includes other revenues that are not levied through the annual assessments that support the District operations. These other revenues may include: interest earnings, other rental/lease income (cell site tower leases), Park Maintenance Fees, Sports Field User Group Rentals, and parking permits (Metrolink Station paid parking). Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#6 Page 379 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Overview Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 commencing with Section 5000) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]. Section 22547 of the 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement". Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights -of -ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#6 Page 380 General Benefit Section 4 of Article XIII D of the California Constitution provides that once a local agency which proposes to impose assessments on property has identified those parcels that will have special benefits conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed, the local agency must next "separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred," and only the special benefits can be included in the amount of the assessments imposed. In this District, the improvements being financed consists of the maintenance of local improvements located within the boundaries of the Andover Tot Lot at Andover and Bedford and include landscaping (includes ground cover only) and appurtenant facilities that are located throughout the District and were installed to create a common landscape theme and neighborhood identity for parcels within the District. The improvements are situated within the public rights-of-way of the internal local street network within the District which provides ingress and egress for parcels within the District to access the City's system of arterial streets. City residents and traffic from parcels not within the District do not use the internal local street network or paseos except for the express purpose of accessing properties located within the District, and therefore do not benefit from the improvements. Only parcels which are within the District and proximate to the improvements and within the District are being assessed. Accordingly, there is a direct physical and visual nexus between each parcel being assessed and the improvements to be funded by the assessment that does not exist for parcels outside of the District boundary and that is particular and distinct from that shared by the public at large. Under these circumstances, all of the benefits conferred are direct and local in nature, and provide a benefit to only those parcels located within the boundaries of the District. Based upon this, it has been determined that there is no quantifiable general benefit to the surrounding community and the public in general from the maintenance of the improvements within the boundaries of the District, and therefore no portion of the project costs should be attributed to general benefit. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District and, as such, confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#6 Page 381 The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District, only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements is identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined. On December 2, 2009 Proposition 218 assessment ballot increase was approved by the property owners in this district. Therefore, all parcels included in the District boundary, are being levied in accordance with Article XIII D and Proposition 218. A single-family home equals one EBU. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land -Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Property Type (County Use Code) EBU Value Multiplier Single Family Residential 1.00 Parcel The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#6 Page 382 The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2018/19 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. The Fiscal Year 2018/19 actual assessment rate will remain at $56.65 per Single Family Residence. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the San Bernardino County Assessor Office, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#6 Page 383 Maximum Allowable Actual Assessment Asessment Rate Total Property Type (County Use Code) Rate per EBU per EBU Units/Acres Total EBUs Single Family Residential $113.29 $56.65 44.00 44.00 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. The Fiscal Year 2018/19 actual assessment rate will remain at $56.65 per Single Family Residence. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the San Bernardino County Assessor Office, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#6 Page 383 Vineyard Av j A S Heilman, vg Archibald Av 1 1 Hermosa Av i ■ Haven Av! Milliken Av Rochester Av Etiwanda Av ! A S2 East Av O ��tS afgza=q as s? Ca gg� Q v CD ga��.i�s9��ns N (11 4�'a ggsas a' 5s o:;�•e 8.s�iga —n D 00 38a sa.x� 0'0 O S 1�3a°9y �4jaQq�q L7 M W Grove Av �_.._..---•—••� Vineyard Av j A S Heilman, vg Archibald Av 1 1 Hermosa Av i ■ Haven Av! Milliken Av Rochester Av Etiwanda Av ! A S2 East Av O 2 W �. Q v CD CO N (11 � O � CD o i ' Carnelian St 1 M i Hellman Av a o Hermosa Av Cn r I Haven Av j 3 i N { .._.._.._.._.._.J Milliken Av fD r... Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2018/19 14 ATTACHMENT#6 Page 384 2 W �. Q v CD CO � r � CD i ' Carnelian St 1 i Hellman Av s Archibald Av Hermosa Av I Haven Av j i i { .._.._.._.._.._.J Milliken Av 1 r... i Rochester Av .............�. .�. Day Creek B1 11 y j n Etiwanda Av i � i W Cherry Av v D y. vl Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2018/19 14 ATTACHMENT#6 Page 384 ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2018/19 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2018/19 actual assessment for the District: A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations There were no effective annexations for Fiscal Year 2018/19. Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#6 Page 385 Actual Assessment Total Property Type (County Use Code) Rate per EBU Units/Acres Total EBUs Total Assessment Single Family Residential $56.65 44.00 44.00 $2,492.60 Totals 44.001 44.00 $2,492.60 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations There were no effective annexations for Fiscal Year 2018/19. Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#6 Page 385 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2018/19 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R (Caryn Planned Community) Page 386 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6-R (CARYN PLANNED COMMUNITY) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2700 Fax: 909.477.2849 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Lynne B. Kennedy, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Sam Spagnolo, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director Page 387 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER 1 INTRODUCTION 3 Reason for Assessment 3 Process for Annual Assessment 3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 4 Description of the Boundaries of the District 4 Description of Improvements and Services 4 Map of Improvements 9 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 11 District Budget 11 Definitions of Budget Items 13 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 14 Overview 14 General Benefit 15 Special Benefit 15 Method of Assessment Spread 16 Cost of Living Inflator 17 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM 18 ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS 20 Assessment Roll 20 Annexations 20 Page 388 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July 18, 2018, the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 18-053, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R (Caryn Planned Community) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed staff to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2018/19 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. Fiscal Year 2018/19 Budget Expenditures Personnel Services $ 17,020 Operations and Maintenance 571,160 Total Expenditures Budget 588,180 Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies 504,780 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 3,850 Subtotal - Taxes 508,630 Other Revenues 6,480 Transfer In 60,370 Total Revenues Budget 575,480 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ (12,700) Total District EBU Count 1,196.98 Actual Assessment per EBU $ 425.97 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU $ 425.97 Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R — City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#7 Page 389 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. 2. 1 have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, I certify that the Annual Engineer's Report and Assessment Diagram included herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R — City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#7 Page 390 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement or facility such as paseos, community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, and providing for the growth, vigor and care of the trees and landscape plant materials. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting of landscape or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the District for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the District by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the District. • Refers to the Engineer's Report, on file with the City Clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the City Clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R — City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#7 Page 391 conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including the improvements, to the zones within the District, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing, must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area located north of the 210 Freeway, south of Banyan St, west of Rochester Ave and east of Milliken Ave, also known as the Caryn Planned Community. The boundaries also include Tract No. 13835 east of Rochester Ave and Tracts No. 13748, 13857 & 13858 west of Milliken Ave. Zone 1 is the area generally located west of Rochester Ave and east of Milliken Ave. Zone 2 is the area generally located east of Rochester Ave and west of Milliken Ave. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements maintained by the District include the paseos, community trails, trees, landscaped sites and appurtenant facilities that are throughout the District. These improvements are located within the street right-of-ways and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, the pruning, fertilizing, mowing, weeding, pest control, removal of trash/debris, and irrigation of the trees, shrubs, vines, ground cover, and turf. Maintenance of associated improvements and facilities, such as community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, includes but is not limited to, grading and replacement of trail surfacing, trail fence repair and replacement, steel fence painting, repair and replacement, and irrigation systems control, adjustment, trouble -shooting, repair and replacement. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, capital projects Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R — City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#7 Page 392 and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Site # Descriptive Location CC -1 The southside of Banyan St from 1290 feet west of Milliken Ave to Milliken Ave. The west side of Milliken Ave median from Banyan St to 292 south of Vintage Dr. Ground Cover area: 96,892 square feet Turf area: 17,945 square feet Hardscape area: 13,944 square feet CC -3 The paseo on the west side of Morning PI from Morning PI to Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 2,801 square feet Turf area: 124 square feet Hardscape area: 4,609 square feet CC -4 The west side of Morning PI, from Banyan St to Starview PI. The north side of Starview PI, from Morning PI to Starview PI. Ground Cover area: 14,273 square feet Turf Cover area: 5,513 square feet Hardscape area: 5,000 square feet CC -5 Silver Sun Ln paseo from the end of Silver Sun Ln cul-de-sac to Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: Turf area: Hardscape area: 25,890 square feet 12,084 square feet 1,350 square feet CC -6 The east and west side of Netherlands View Loop from Vintage Dr to Vintage Dr. The Netherlands View Loop paseo from Netherlands View Loop to Mt Sterling Ct. Ground Cover area: 88,902 square feet Turf area: 676 square feet Hardscape area: 23,650 square feet CC -7 The east and west side of Hillview Loop from Mt Rainier Ct to Kettle Peak PI Ground Cover area: Turf area: Hardscape area: 14,930 square feet 6,318 square feet 12,236 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R — City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#7 Page 393 CC -8 The paseo from Hillview Loop to Vintage Dr. Ground Cover area: 42,107 square feet Hardscape area: 22,752 square feet Hardscape area: 4,089 square feet CC -9 The south side of Vintage Dr from 250 feet west of Hillview Loop to Hillview Loop. The west side of Hillview Loop from Vintage Dr to Kettle Peak PI. The west side of Kettle Peak PI from Hillview Loop to Donner Pass Ct. The east side of Hillview Loop from Kettle Peak PI to Tioga Peak Ct. Ground Cover area: 47,334 square feet Turf area: 4,954 square feet Hardscape area: 9,088 square feet CC -10 The east side of Terrace View Loop from Vintage Dr to Butler Peak PI. The west side of Terrace View Loop from Rainbow Falls Ct to Vintage Dr. Ground Cover area: 24,603 square feet Hardscape area: 10,760 square feet CC -11 The paseo from Caryn School to Banyan St. The south side of Banyan St from the paseo to Rochester Ave. The east and west side of Mt Baldy PI from Banyan St to Sierra Crest View Loop. The north side of Sierra Crest View Loop from Hilltop Ct to Woodland Ct. Ground Cover area: 47,507 square feet Turf area: 7,810 square feet Hardscape area: 7,825 square feet CC -12 The separation paseo from Vintage Dr to Pinnacle Peak Ct. Ground Cover area: 50,325 square feet Turf area: 15,021 square feet Hardscape area: 7,675 square feet CC -13 The east side of Hillview Loop from Tioga Peak Ct to Vintage Dr. The south side of Vintage Dr from Hillview Loop to Terrace View Loop. The north side of Vintage Dr from Hillview Loop to Caryn School. The east side of Terrace View Loop from Vintage Dr to Mt San Antonio Ct. Ground Cover area: 26,162 square feet Turf area: 4,508 square feet Hardscape area: 12,928 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R — City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#7 Page 394 CC -14 The east side of Sierra Crest View Loop from Mt Waverly Ct to Vintage Dr. The north side of Vintage Dr from Sierra Crest View Loop to Sierra Crest View Loop. The east and west side of Sierra Crest View Loop from Vintage Dr to Mt Wilson Ct. The south side of Vintage Dr from Netherlands View Loop to 330 feet west of Netherlands View Loop. Ground Cover area: 73,250 square feet Turf area: 16,525 square feet Hardscape area: 9,885 square feet CC -15 The south side of Sierra Crest View Loop from Mt Waverly Ct to Mt Cambridge Ct. The north side of Sierra Crest View Loop from Mt Cambridge Ct to Woodland Ct. The north side of Sierra Crest View Loop from Hilltop Ct to Caryn School. The Sierra Crest View Loop paseo from Sierra Crest View Loop to Mt Sherman Ct. Ground Cover area: 70,990 square feet Turf area: 7,699 square feet Hardscape area: 20,055 square feet CC -16 The south side of Vintage Dr from Netherlands View Loop to Rochester Ave. The north side of Vintage Dr from Rochester Ave to Sierra Crest View Loop. The east and west side of Sierra Crest View Loop from Mt Wilson Ct to Mt Cambridge Ct. The Netherlands View Loop Paseo from Vintage Dr to Mt Sterling Ct. Ground Cover area: 77,202 square feet Turf area: 3,954 square feet Hardscape area: 18,195 square feet CC -17 The east side of Milliken Ave from Vintage Dr to Banyan St. Ground Cover area: Turf area: Hardscape area: 13,740 square feet 9,088 square feet 6,460 square feet CC -18 The north side of Vintage Dr from Milliken Ave to Hillview Loop. The south side of Vintage Dr from 104 feet west of Hillview Loop to Milliken Ave. Ground Cover area: 32,287 square feet Turf area: 3,889 square feet Hardscape area: 11,188 square feet CC -19 The Terrace View Loop paseo from Vintage Dr to Terrace View Loop. Ground Cover area: 17,469 square feet Turf area: 15,617 square feet Hardscape area: 2,736 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R — City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#7 Page 395 CC -20 The east side of Terrace View Loop from Mt San Antonio Ct to EI Capitan Ct. The west side of Terrace View Loop from Butler Peak PI to Mt San Antonio Ct. Ground Cover area: 20,627 square feet Hardscape area: 20,017 square feet Hardscape area: 7,888 square feet CC -21 The west side of Rochester Ave from Banyan St to 317 feet south of Vintage Dr. Ground Cover area: 31,292 square feet CC -22 The south side of Vintage Dr from Terrace View Loop to Sierra Crest View Loop. The east and west side of Hillview Loop from Vintage Dr to Mt Rainier Ct. Ground Cover area: 11,609 square feet Turf area: 3,763 square feet Hardscape area: 6,524 square feet CC -23 The south side of Banyan St from Milliken Ave to Butler Peak PI. The west side of Butler Peak PI from Banyan St to Terrace View Loop. The north side of Terrace View Loop from Butler Peak PI to Rainbow Falls Ct. Ground Cover area: 12,132 square feet Hardscape area: 528 square feet CC -24 The north side of Terrace View Loop from EI Capitan Ct to Butler Peak PI. The east side of Butler Peak PI from Terrace View Loop to Banyan St. The south side of Banyan St from Butler Peak PI to 990 feet east of Butler Peak PI. Ground Cover area: 14,452 square feet Hardscape area: 1,600 square feet CC -26 The east side of Rochester Ave from 210 freeway to Vintage Dr. The north and south side of Vintage Dr from Rochester Ave to Thunder Mountain Ave. The west side of Rochester Ave from 317 feet south of Vintage Dr to the 210 freeway. Ground Cover area: 35,037 square feet Hardscape area: 19,779 square feet CC -27 The Milliken Ave median and the west side of Milliken Ave from 292 feet south of Vintage Dr to 210 freeway. Ground Cover area: 13,365 square feet Hardscape area: 12,300 square feet CC -28 The east side of Milliken Ave from Vintage Dr to the 210 freeway right-of-way. Ground Cover area: 17,724 square feet Cobble area: 2,387 square feet Hardscape area: 5,810 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R — City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#7 Page 396 Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R — City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#7 Page 397 Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R — City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#7 Page 398 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the District levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Fiscal Year 2018/19 Budget Expenditures Personnel Services: Regular Salaries $ 11,580 Fringe Benefits 5,440 Subtotal - Personnel 17,020 Operations and Maintenance: Operations and Maintenance: O & M/General Emergency Equipment and Vehicle Rental Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance Contract Services: Contract Services/General Tree Maintenance Subtotal - Contract Services Utilities: Water Utilities Electric Utilities Subtotal - Utilities Assessment Administration Adm in./General Overhead Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance Total Expenditures Budget 11,900 200 12,100 293,450 34,850 328,300 182,300 9,130 191,430 5,980 33,350 571,160 $ 588,180 Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R — City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#7 Page 399 Fiscal Year 2018/19 Budget Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies $ 504,780 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 3,850 Subtotal - Taxes 508,630 Other Revenues: Interest Earnings 6,480 Transfer In: Transfer In - General Fund 60,370 Total Revenues Budget $ 575,480 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ (12,700) Total Gross Estimated Assessments $ 509,875.13 Total District EBU Count 1,196.98 Actual Assessment per EBU - Fiscal Year 2018/19 $ 425.97 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU - Fiscal Year 2018/19 $ 425.97 The maximum allowable assessment per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved when the property owners on September 1, 2010, voted in favor of a Proposition 218 assessment ballot increase with an allowable annual increase by the lesser of 3.0% or the percentage change in the year ending February preceding the start of the Fiscal Year of the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (CPI -U) and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however, it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Operating Reserve Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2017 $ 457,722 Contribution to Reserve - Fiscal Year 2017/18 (12,700) Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2018 $ 445,022 Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R — City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#7 Page 400 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time and part-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Additionally, this includes benefits available to City employees. Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District. Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Utilities: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity, water, and telephone services, as required, for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers in the District. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost of all particular departments and staff of the City, as well as consultants, for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual Engineer's Report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all central services departments of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational District within the City's administrative structure. Capital Outlay: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Other Revenues: This includes other revenues that are not levied through the annual assessments that support the District operations. These other revenues may include: interest earnings, other rental/lease income (cell site tower leases), Park Maintenance Fees, Sports Field User Group Rentals, and parking permits (Metrolink Station paid parking). Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R — City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#7 Page 401 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Overview Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 commencing with Section 5000) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]. Section 22547 of the 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement". Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights -of -ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R — City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#7 Page 402 General Benefit Section 4 of Article XIII D of the California Constitution provides that once a local agency which proposes to impose assessments on property has identified those parcels that will have special benefits conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed, the local agency must next "separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred," and only the special benefits can be included in the amount of the assessments imposed. In this District, the improvements being financed consists of the maintenance of local improvements located within the boundaries of the District and include paseos, street trees, landscaped areas and appurtenant facilities that are located throughout the District and were installed to create a common landscape theme and neighborhood identity for parcels within the District. The improvements are situated within the public rights-of-way of the internal local street network within the District which provides ingress and egress for parcels within the District to access the City's system of arterial streets. City residents and traffic from parcels not within the District do not use the internal local street network or paseos except for the express purpose of accessing properties located within the District, and therefore do not benefit from the improvements. Only parcels which are within the District and proximate to the improvements and within the District are being assessed. Accordingly, there is a direct physical and visual nexus between each parcel being assessed and the improvements to be funded by the assessment that does not exist for parcels outside of the District boundary and that is particular and distinct from that shared by the public at large. Under these circumstances, all of the benefits conferred are direct and local in nature, and provide a benefit to only those parcels located within the boundaries of the District. Based upon this, it has been determined that there is no quantifiable general benefit to the surrounding community and the public in general from the maintenance of the improvements within the boundaries of the District, and therefore no portion of the project costs should be attributed to general benefit. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District and, as such, confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R — City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#7 Page 403 share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District, only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements is identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The EBU method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one EBU. Every other land -use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land -use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. Vacant parcels are assigned an EBU value of 0.25 EBU's per acre because they receive a lesser benefit from the improvements until such time as development occurs. Publicly owned school parcels are also assigned an EBU value of 0.25 EBU's per acre in recognition of the limited benefit they receive from the improvements which are provided for the use and benefit of the residential units within the District, and the benefit conferred upon other parcels within the District by the open space and landscaping maintained by the School District on their parcels which might be used by properties within the District under joint use agreements between the School District and the City. There are two benefit zones within the District: Zone 1 and Zone 2. Parcels in Zone 2 are assigned 0.75 EBU per dwelling unit due to the reduction in special benefit they receive as a result of their location relative to the majority of the improvements maintained by the District. Zone 2 parcels are on the far east and west side of the District. Therefore, parcels within Zone 2 do not receive the same special benefit from the improvements due to their proximity, as parcels within Zone 1 which are assigned 1.00 EBU per dwelling unit and are generally located adjacent to or in close proximity to the improvements. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land -use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R — City of Rancho Cucamonga 16 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#7 Page 404 Land -Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Property Type (County Use Code) EBU Value Multiplier Single Family Residential - Zone 1 1.00 Parcel Single Family Residential - Zone 2 0.75 Parcel School 0.25 Acre Undeveloped 0.25 Acre The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2018/19 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Property Type (County Use Code) Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate per EBU Actual Asessment Rate per EBU Total Units/Acres Total EBUs Single Family Residential - Zone 1 $425.97 $425.97 963.00 963.00 Single Family Residential - Zone 1 425.97 425.97 310.00 232.50 School 425.97 425.97 5.35 1.34 Undeveloped 425.97 425.97 0.54 0.14 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Cost of Living Inflator Each fiscal year beginning Fiscal Year 2011/12, the maximum allowable assessment amount may be increased by the lesser of 3.0% or the percentage change in the year ending February preceding the start of the Fiscal Year of the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (CPI - U), for the Los Angeles -Riverside -Orange County area. If for any reason the percentage change is negative the maximum allowable assessment would not be decreased by reason of such negative percentage change and would remain at the amount as computed on the previous fiscal year regardless of any CPI adjustment. The annual assessment cannot exceed the actual costs to operate the District in any given year. If operating costs are such that the maximum assessment amount is not needed, the City would levy only what is needed for that year. Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R — City of Rancho Cucamonga 17 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#7 Page 405 The actual assessment rate for Fiscal Year 2018/19 will increase from $413.57 to $425.97 per single-family residence zone 1 and from $310.18 to $319.48 per single family residence zone 2, a CPI increase of 3.0% as compared to Fiscal Year 2017/18. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the San Bernardino County Assessor Office, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R — City of Rancho Cucamonga 18 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#7 Page 406 ;�9c�algs33a" eaa3 �ga�„ d 3 II`� srei_=� g 11,61- a i =� a -n p W O !' 3 Sgeza:�t;S � N �1 07 ;sag-;�yq}q Grove Av .� ilia fig, t{lia' ' a' vis :j Vineyard Av E W Hellman Av Archibald Av Hermosa Av Haven Av Milliken Av Rochester Av Etiwanda Av I.._.—� A 3 East Av D -n 0 0 0 � W r 0 ��N v cQ o) cD N N ;U Q O 0 D Z3 N < fD (D r N fD 3. N N. Cherry Av — n Q ............... e Carnelian St i Hellman Av i i Archibald Av i W � Hermosa Av O (0 .10 r � i CL Cherry Av — n Q ............... e Carnelian St i Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R — City of Rancho Cucamonga 19 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#7 Page 407 Hellman Av i i Archibald Av i Hermosa Av i i Haven Av i i i _.._.._.._.._.! Milliken Av Rochester Av Day Creek i (D Etiv✓anda Avi i i rs � I .............. (fl 0 v► O D � 1, Na �T �V Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R — City of Rancho Cucamonga 19 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#7 Page 407 ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2018/19 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2018/19 actual assessments for the District: Property Type (County Use Code) Actual Assessment Rate per EBU Total Units/Acres Total EBUs Total Assessment Single Family Residential - Zone 1 $425.97 963.00 963.00 $410,209.11 Single Family Residential - Zone 2 $425.97 310.00 232.50 99,038.80 School $425.97 5.35 1.34 569.72 Undeveloped 1 $425.97 0.54 0.14 57.50 Totals 1 1 1,278.89 1,196.98 $509,875.13 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations There were no effective annexations for Fiscal Year 2018/19. Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R — City of Rancho Cucamonga 20 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#7 Page 408 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2018/19 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) Page 409 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 (NORTH ETIWANDA) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2700 Fax: 909.477.2849 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Lynne B. Kennedy, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Sam Spagnolo, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director Page 410 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER 1 INTRODUCTION 3 Reason for Assessment 3 Process for Annual Assessment 3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 4 Description of the Boundaries of the District 4 Description of Improvements and Services 4 Map of Improvements 11 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 13 District Budget 13 Definitions of Budget Items 15 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 16 Overview 16 General Benefit 17 Special Benefit 17 Method of Assessment Spread 18 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM 19 ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS 21 Assessment Roll 21 Annexations 21 Page 411 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July 18, 2018 the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 18-053, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed staff to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2018/19 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. Expenditures Personnel Services Operations and Maintenance Total Expenditures Budget Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection Subtotal - Taxes Other Revenues Transfer In Total Revenues Budget Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance Total District EBU Count Actual Assessment per EBU Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2018/19 Fiscal Year 2018/19 Budget $ 202,440 1,015,470 1,217,910 937,780 11,860 949,640 47,860 30,000 1,027,500 $ (190,410) 3,085.00 $ 307.05 $ 307.05 1 ATTACHMENT#8 Page 412 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. 2. 1 have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, I certify that the Annual Engineer's Report and Assessment Diagram included herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#8 Page 413 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include, but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement or facility such as paseos, community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, and providing for the growth, vigor and care of the trees and landscape plant materials. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting of landscape or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the District for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the District by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the District. • Refers to the Engineer's Report, on file with the City Clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the City Clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#8 Page 414 hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including the improvements, to the zones within the District, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area of the City known as North Etiwanda, which is generally bounded by the 210 Freeway on the south, 1-15 Freeway on the west, and City limits on the north and east. Typically, parcels have been annexed to the District as they have been developed. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of the paseos, parkways, median islands, street trees, parks, landscaped sites and appurtenant facilities that are throughout the District. These improvements are located within the street right-of-ways and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, the pruning, fertilizing, mowing, weeding, pest control, removal of trash/debris, and irrigation of the trees, shrubs, vines, ground cover, and turf. Maintenance of associated improvements and facilities, such as community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, includes but is not limited to, grading and replacement of trail surfacing, trail fence repair and Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#8 Page 415 replacement, steel fence painting, repair and replacement, and irrigation systems control, adjustment, trouble -shooting, repair and replacement. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, capital projects and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Parks: Etiwanda Creek Park. Site # Descriptive Location EN -1 The north side of Wilson Ave from San Sevaine Rd to Ridgeline PI. The east side of Ridgeline PI from Wilson Ave to Arcadia Way. Ground Cover area: 27,325 square feet Turf area: 19,334 square feet Hardscape area: 840 square feet EN -2 The Metropolitan Water District easement on the south side of Crescenta Way from San Marino Way to Ridgeline PI. Ground Cover area: 38,104 square feet Turf area: 41,250 square feet Hardscape area: 9,000 square feet EN -3 The Wilson Ave median from Wardman Bullock Rd to San Sevaine Rd. Ground Cover area: 9,016 square feet Hardscape area: 11,088 square feet EN -4 The Planters on the north side of the drainage easement that is between and parallel to Highland Ave and Arapaho Rd from Etiwanda Ave east to the end. Ground Cover area: 63,972 square feet EN -5 The south side of Wilson Ave from 1,115 feet west of San Sevaine Rd to 205 feet east of San Sevaine Rd. The east side of San Sevaine Rd from Wilson Ave to Young's Canyon Rd. Ground Cover area: 45,584 square feet Turf area: 3,527 square feet EN -6 The north side of Wilson Ave from Wardman Bullock Rd to Ridgeline PI. The west side of Ridgeline PI from Wilson Ave to 120 feet north of Arcadia Way. Ground Cover area: 29,226 square feet Turf area: 15,136 square feet Hardscape area: 1,300 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#8 Page 416 EN -7 The parkway on the eastside of Wardman Bullock Rd from Wilson Ave to 857 feet north of Glendora Dr. The cobblestone between the tract wall and the flood wall will be handled for debris pickup and weed control on an as needed basis. Ground Cover area: 10,268 square feet Hardscape area: 31,549 square feet EN -8 The south side of Crescenta Way from Ridgeline PI to Crestline PI. Ground Cover area: 50,035 square feet Turf area: 35,960 square feet Hardscape area: 10,000 square feet EN -9 The paseo from Meadowbrook Ct to Rock Creek Rd. Ground Cover area: 1,400 square feet Turf area: 6,555 square feet Hardscape area: 2,820 square feet EN -10 The paseo from Etiwanda Ave to Pacific Crest PI. The west side of Etiwanda Ave from 175 feet north of N Rim Way to 171 feet south of Golden Prairie Dr. Ground Cover area: 49,020 square feet Turf area: 4,445 square feet Hardscape area: 13,026 square feet EN -11 The paseo south of Ridgecrest Dr to southern boundary of Tract 14139. This site is temporarily maintained by another contractor and was deleted from the contract as of July 16, 2001; however, this site is still the City's property. Ground Cover area: 3,548 square feet Turf area: 800 square feet Hardscape area: 4,280 square feet EN -12 The cul-de-sac on the north side of Ridgecrest Dr at Etiwanda Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 1,870 square feet Turf area: 700 square feet Hardscape area: 450 square feet EN -13 The north side of Wilson Ave from 574 feet west of Cherry Ave to the channel east of San Sevaine Rd. The Wilson Ave median from Cherry Ave to San Sevaine Rd. The east side of San Sevaine Rd from Wilson Ave to 136 feet north of Crescenta Way. Ground Cover area: 46,611 square feet Turf area: 5,037 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#8 Page 417 EN -14 The west side of San Sevaine Rd from 150 feet north of Wilson Ave to 136 feet north of Crescenta Way. Ground Cover area: 55,166 square feet Turf area: 235 square feet Hardscape area: 6,975 square feet EN -15 The north side of Young's Canyon Rd from 500 feet east of Koch PI to 692 feet west of Koch PI. The south side of Young's Canyon Rd from 349 feet east of Koch PI to 692 feet west of Koch PI. The east and west side of Koch PI place from Young's Canyon Rd to 132 feet north of Young's Canyon Rd. The west side of Koch PI from Young's Canyon Rd to 132 feet south of Young's Canyon Rd. The east side of Koch PI from 82 feet south of Young's Canyon Rd to Young's Canyon Rd. The trailhead north east of the east end of Young's Canyon Rd to the south end of San Sevaine Rd Horse Trail. The south end of San Sevaine Rd Horse from the trail head to 254 feet north of trailhead. Ground Cover area: 42,925 square feet Hardscape area: 14,308 square feet EN -16 The east side of Wardman Bullock Rd from 225 feet south of San Segundo Dr to 80 feet north of Dona Way. Ground Cover area: 2,056 square feet Hardscape area: 3,450 square feet EN -17 The north side of Colonbero Rd from San Sevaine Rd Channel to Guidera Dr. The south side of Colonbero Rd from San Sevaine Rd Channel to 400 feet north of Guidera Dr. The north side of Aggazzotti Rd from Colonbero Rd to 475 feet east of Colonbero Rd. This site has a pump which will be adjusted and maintained by City personnel. Ground Cover area: 43,241 square feet Hardscape area: 29,125 square feet EN -18 The north side of Aggazzotti Rd from San Antonio Dr to San Sevaine Rd. The west side of San Sevaine Rd from Aggazzotti Rd to 702 feet south of Aggazzotti Rd. The east side of San Sevaine Rd from 702 feet south of Aggazzotti Rd to Regina Dr. Ground Cover area: 47,823 square feet Hardscape area: 30,986 square feet EN -19 The south side of Wilson Ave from Etiwanda Ave to Estates Way. Ground Cover area: 45,727 square feet Hardscape area: 19,229 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#8 Page 418 EN -20 The south side of Wilson Ave form Bluegrass Ave to Estates Way. Ground Cover area: 85,155 square feet Hardscape area: 48,784 square feet EN -21 The north side of Wilson Ave from Etiwanda Ave to Cervantes PI. The Wilson Ave median from Etiwanda Ave to Cervantes PI. The westside of Etiwanda Ave from Wilson Ave to Del Norte PI. Ground Cover area: 88,795 square feet Hardscape area: 27,128 square feet EN -22 The north and south side of Vintage Dr from 165 feet east of Countrywood PI to 338 feet west of Countrywood PI. Ground Cover area: 13,603 square feet Hardscape area: 7,365 square feet EN -23 The north side of Wilson Ave and median from Etiwanda Ave west to Etiwanda Ave. The east side of Etiwanda Ave from Wilson Ave to 1150 feet north of Wilson Ave. Ground Cover area: 32,027 square feet Hardscape area: 29,567 square feet EN -24 The north side of Vintage Dr from 360 feet west of Ascot PI to 230 feet east of Countrywood PI. The south side of Vintage Dr from Ascot PI to 500 feet east of Countrywood PI. Ground Cover area: 34,707 square feet Hardscape area: 92,600 square feet EN -25 The east side of Bluegrass Ave from Banyan St to 610 feet north of Banyan St. Ground Cover area: 4,054 square feet Hardscape area: 5,819 square feet EN -26 The south side of Banyan St from Bluegrass Ave to Greenwood PI. Ground Cover area: 6,240 square feet Hardscape area: 3,200 square feet EN -27 The south side of Banyan St from Laurel Blossom PI to Etiwanda Ave. Ground Cover area: 1,703 square feet Hardscape area: 8,417 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#8 Page 419 EN -28 The north side of Wilson Ave from Cervantes PI to 1715 feet west of Cervantes PI. The west side of Cervantes PI from Carmel Knolls Dr to Wilson Ave. The paseo from Wilson Ave to Tejas Ct. The median on Wilson Ave from Cervantes PI to Bluegrass Ave. The following temporary landscape: There is one planter on the west side of Altura Dr at Tejas Ct. There are five planters on the south side of Tejas Ct from Altura Dr to 195 feet east of Altura Dr. Ground Cover area: 25,048 square feet Hardscape area: 22,532 square feet EN -29 The south side of Banyan St from 787 feet west of East Ave to East Ave. The west side of East Ave from Banyan St to 600 feet south of Blue Gum. The east side of East Ave from Banyan St to 537 feet south of Banyan St. Ground Cover area: 16,111 square feet Hardscape area: 15,774 square feet EN -30 The east side of Bluegrass Ave from 257 feet south of Churchill Dr to 418 feet north of Churchill Dr. Ground Cover area: 9,303 square feet Hardscape area: 5,302 square feet EN -31 The south side of Banyan St from 375 feet south of Cashew Way to Rose Way. The north side of Banyan St from 435 feet west of Peak PI to Wardman Bullock Rd. Ground Cover area: 53,000 square feet Hardscape area: 26,855 square feet EN -32 The landscaping south of the equestrian trail from 210 feet west of Grovewood PI to 1,170 feet east of Grovewood PI. Ground Cover area: 6,900 square feet EN -33 The north side of Young's Canyon Rd from 600 feet east of Banyan St to Banyan St. The east side of Wardman Bullock Rd from Banyan St to Wilson Ave. The south side of Wilson Ave from Wardman Bullock Rd to 635 feet east of Fields PI. Ground Cover area: 66,601 square feet Hardscape area: 46,332 square feet EN -34 The west side of Wardman Bullock Rd from Wilson Ave to Banyan St. Parkview Way from Wardman Bullock Rd to Soledad Way. Ground Cover area: 67,021 square feet Hardscape area: 34,045 square feet EN -35 The north side of Day Creek Blvd from Etiwanda Ave to Indian Wells PI Ground Cover area: 160,737 square feet Hardscape area: 128,254 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#8 Page 420 EN -36 The south side of Day Creek Blvd from 380 feet north of Coyote Dr to Etiwanda Ave. The west side of Etiwanda Ave from Day Creek Blvd to 170 feet north of N Rim Way. The west side of Day Creek Blvd from 380 feet north of Coyote Dr to Indian Wells PI. Ground Cover area: 58,398 square feet Hardscape area: 68,127 square feet EN -37 The east side of East Ave from 235 feet south of Hunt Club Dr to 375 feet north of Hunt Club Dr. Ground Cover area: 5,559 square feet Hardscape area: 5,231 square feet EN -38 The west side of East Ave from 236 feet north of Philly Dr to 245 feet south of Philly Dr. Ground Cover area: 4,605 square feet Hardscape area: 3,394 square feet EN -39 The south side of Banyan St from Golden Lock PI to Raindrop PI Ground Cover area 6,024 square feet Hardscape area: 330 square feet EN -40 The west side of Wardman Bullock Rd from Colonbero Rd to Breeders Cup Dr. The east side of Wardman Bullock Rd from Colonbero Rd to 385 feet south of Colonbero Rd. Ground Cover area: 28,527 square feet Hardscape area: 21,723 square feet EN -41 The north side of Colonbero Rd from Wardman Bullock Rd to Ambleside PI. The south side of Colonbero Rd from 150 feet east of Wardman Bullock Rd to Ambleside PI. The east side of Ambleside PI from Colonbero Rd to 700 feet north of Colonbero Rd. Ground Cover area: 17,065 square feet Hardscape area: 12,990 square feet EN -42 The west side of Wardman Bullock Rd from 778 feet north of Coral Sky Dr to Wilson Ave. The north side of Wilson Ave from Wardman Bullock Rd to 218 feet west of Compass PI. The east and west sides of Compass PI. from Wilson Ave to the entrance monuments. Ground Cover area: 31,809 square feet Hardscape area: 34,321 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#8 Page 421 Parks, ground cover, shrubs and turf areas that make up parkways, median islands and paseos are maintenance under contract by a private landscape maintenance company. Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#8 Page 422 Etiwa nda Av East Av i Day Creek BI i // T I m T T NI z A a (z I N I ' N i lir M • z i ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the District levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Operations and Maintenance: Fiscal Year Operations and Maintenance: 2018/19 Budget Expenditures 39,800 Personnel Services: 1,500 Regular Salaries $ 127,110 Part-time Salaries 13,160 Fringe Benefits 62,170 Subtotal - Personnel 202,440 Operations and Maintenance: Operations and Maintenance: O & M/General 39,800 O & M/Facilities 1,500 Emergency Equipment and Vehicle Rental 2,200 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 43,500 Contract Services: Contract Services/General 446,190 Contract Services/Facilities 2,750 Tree Maintenance 25,090 Subtotal - Contract Services 474,030 Utilities: Telephone Utilities 820 Water Utilities 364,960 Electric Utilities 27,640 Subtotal - Utilities 393,420 Assessment Administration 14,430 Adm in./General Overhead 89,410 Other Expenses 680 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 1,015,470 Total Expenditures Budget $ 1,217,910 Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#8 Page 424 The maximum allowable assessment per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in Fiscal Year 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however, it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#8 Page 425 Fiscal Year 2018/19 Budget Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies $ 937,780 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 11,860 Subtotal - Taxes 949,640 Other Revenues: Interest Earnings 16,070 Other Rental/Lease Income 25,660 Park Maintenance Fees 540 Sports Field User Group Rentals 5,590 Subtotal - Other Revenues: 47,860 Transfer In 30,000 Total Revenues Budget $ 1,027,500 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ (190,410) Total Gross Estimated Assessments $ 947,249.25 Total District EBU Count 3,085.00 Actual Assessment per EBU - Fiscal Year 2018/19 $ 307.05 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU - Fiscal Year 2018/19 $ 307.05 The maximum allowable assessment per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in Fiscal Year 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however, it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#8 Page 425 Operating Reserve Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2018 $ 1,048,185 Contribution to Reserve - Fiscal Year 2018/19 (190,410) Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2019 $ 857,775 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time and part-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Additionally, this includes benefits available to City employees. Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District. Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Utilities: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity, water, and telephone services, as required, for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers in the District. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost of all particular departments and staff of the City, as well as consultants, for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual Engineer's Report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all central services departments of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational District within the City's administrative structure. Capital Outlay: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#8 Page 426 Other Revenues: This includes other revenues that are not levied through the annual assessments that support the District operations. These other revenues may include: interest earnings, other rental/lease income (cell site tower leases), Park Maintenance Fees, Sports Field User Group Rentals, and parking permits (Metrolink Station paid parking). METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Overview Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 commencing with Section 5000) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]. Section 22547 of the 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement". Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights -of -ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 16 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#8 Page 427 The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. General Benefit Section 4 of Article XIII D of the California Constitution provides that once a local agency which proposes to impose assessments on property has identified those parcels that will have special benefits conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed, the local agency must next "separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred," and only the special benefits can be included in the amount of the assessments imposed. In this District, the improvements being financed consists of the maintenance of local improvements located within the boundaries of the District and include paseos, street trees, landscaped areas and appurtenant facilities that are located throughout the District and were installed to create a common landscape theme and neighborhood identity for parcels within the District. The improvements are situated within the public rights-of-way of the internal local street network within the District which provides ingress and egress for parcels within the District to access the City's system of arterial streets. City residents and traffic from parcels not within the District do not use the internal local street network or paseos except for the express purpose of accessing properties located within the District, and therefore do not benefit from the improvements. Only parcels which are within the District and proximate to the improvements and within the District are being assessed. Accordingly, there is a direct physical and visual nexus between each parcel being assessed and the improvements to be funded by the assessment that does not exist for parcels outside of the District boundary and that is particular and distinct from that shared by the public at large. Under these circumstances, all of the benefits conferred are direct and local in nature, and provide a benefit to only those parcels located within the boundaries of the District. Based upon this, it has been determined that there is no quantifiable general benefit to the surrounding community and the public in general from the maintenance of the improvements within the boundaries of the District, and therefore no portion of the project costs should be attributed to general benefit. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District and, as such, confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 17 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#8 Page 428 • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District, only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements is identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed, Article XIID and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIID and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined, however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since 1996/97 Fiscal Year. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The EBU method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one EBU. The following table provides the weighting factors to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land -Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Property Type (County Use Code) EBU Value Multiplier Single Family Residential 1.00 Parcel The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 18 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#8 Page 429 be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2018/19 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the San Bernardino County Assessor Office, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 19 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#8 Page 430 Maximum Allowable Actual Assessment Asessment Rate Total Property Type (County Use Code) Rate per EBU per EBU Units/Acres Total EBUs Single Family Residential $307.05 $307.05 3,085.00 3,085.00 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the San Bernardino County Assessor Office, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 19 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#8 Page 430 oa�gg c aaBs��R°6.� s CU 3ii¢ag:€ s m :gagaa' D o W a .. .if .;a as O s 2 (S &aas W Z1 W CD U) j lls Grove Av ;_.._..=--•—••�._t— Q s pp Y j ! Carnelian St Vineyard Av j Hellman Av i Hellman Av Archibald Av Archibald Av Hermosa AvM111 Hermosa Av Haven Av Haven Av Milliken Av Milliken Av i Rochester Av j Rochester Av ' Day C B I y Etiwanda Av Etiwanda Av S2East Av �_._.._.._.._...----- _� ai D 0 o °o W CD N � 0 CL Ut ' Cherry Av CL � v v 3 F1* U Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 20 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#8 Page 431 ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2018/19 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2018/19 actual assessments for the District: A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations The following annexations are effective for Fiscal Year 2018/19: Annexation Total Units/ Apn Date Project Name Acres Total EBUs Property Type 1087-261-12 08/02/17 PM 17663 12.00 12.00 SFD )225-122-83 10/18/17 DRC2015-00821 1.00 1.00 SFD Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 21 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#8 Page 432 Actual Assessment Total Property Type (County Use Code) Rate per EBU Units/Acres Total EBUs Total Assessment Single Family Residential $307.05 3,085.00 3,085.00 $947,249.25 Totals 3,085.00 3,085.00 $947,249.25 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations The following annexations are effective for Fiscal Year 2018/19: Annexation Total Units/ Apn Date Project Name Acres Total EBUs Property Type 1087-261-12 08/02/17 PM 17663 12.00 12.00 SFD )225-122-83 10/18/17 DRC2015-00821 1.00 1.00 SFD Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 21 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#8 Page 432 Annual Engineering Report Fiscal Year 2018/19 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) Page 433 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 8 (SOUTH ETIWANDA) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.774.2700 Fax: 909.774.2849 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Lynne B. Kennedy, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Sam Spagnolo, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director Page 434 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER 1 INTRODUCTION 3 Reason for Assessment 3 Process for Annual Assessment 3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 4 Description of the Boundaries of the District 4 Description of Improvements and Services 4 Map of Improvements 5 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 7 District Budget 7 Definitions of Budget Items 9 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 10 Overview 10 General Benefit 11 Special Benefit 11 Method of Assessment Spread 12 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM 13 ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS 15 Assessment Roll 15 Annexations 15 Page 435 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July 18, 2018, the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 18-053, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed staff to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2018/19 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. Expenditures Personnel Services Operations and Maintenance Total Expenditures Budget Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection Subtotal - Taxes Other Revenues Total Revenues Budget Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance Total District EBU Count Actual Assessment per EBU Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2018/19 Fiscal Year 2018/19 Budget $ 4,880 32,570 37,450 33,920 380 34,300 1,000 35,300 $ (2,150) 226.22 $ 151.45 $ 151.45 1 ATTACHMENT#9 Page 436 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. 2. 1 have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, I certify that the Annual Engineer's Report and Assessment Diagram included herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#9 Page 437 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement or facility such as paseos, community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, and providing for the growth, vigor and care of the trees and landscape plant materials. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting of landscape or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the District for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the District by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the District. • Refers to the Engineer's Report, on file with the City Clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the City Clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#9 Page 438 conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including the improvements, to the zones within the District, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to, the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area known as South Etiwanda, which is south of the 1-210 Freeway along Fisher Dr, east of East Ave, including the south side of Highstone Manor Ct, the south side of Smokestone St, and to the San Bernardino County Flood Control drainage basin on east side. Typically, parcels have been annexed to the District as they have been developed. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements maintained by the District include the paseos, community trails, trees, landscaped sites and appurtenant facilities that are throughout the District. These improvements are located within the street right-of-ways and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, the pruning, fertilizing, mowing, weeding, pest control, removal of trash/debris, and irrigation of the trees, shrubs, vines, ground cover, and turf. Maintenance of associated improvements and facilities, such as community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, includes but is not limited to, grading and replacement of trail surfacing, trail fence repair and replacement, steel fence painting, repair and replacement, and irrigation systems control, adjustment, trouble -shooting, repair and replacement. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, capital projects Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#9 Page 439 and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Site # Descriptive Location SE -1 The east side of East Ave from 480 feet south of Catalpa St to 182 feet north of Catalpa St. The north and south side of Catalpa St from East Ave to Brownstone PI. The west side of Brownstone PI from Catalpa St to 150 feet south of Catalpa St. Not including the frontage parkway at 6649 East Ave. Ground Cover area: 10,355 square feet Turf area: 6,258 square feet Hardscape area: 4,050 square feet SE -2 The south side of Fisher Dr from 361 feet east of East Ave to 210 feet east of Starstone PI. Ground Cover area: 9,366 square feet Hardscape area: 4,074 square feet SE -3 The south side of Fisher Dr from 860 feet west of Mulberry St to Mulberry St. Ground Cover area: 3,676 square feet Hardscape area: 6,910 square feet Ground cover, shrubs and turf areas that make up parkways, median islands and paseos are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company. With a Majority Protest for the Proposition 218 Ballot Initiative in September 2010, the City stopped maintaining the north side of Fisher Dr and reduced the service level to a B. Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#9 Page 440 Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#9 Page 441 jj$ } East Av ' --Till till: 131jjjja}, 4 I I o � m I ry � ♦ ♦ i � i ai ♦ "♦ w y ♦ ♦♦ I I 0 �♦ I i z r w I v 110 i I (p . W 00 CD cD cQ' CO O Q �• J ♦"♦ N ♦ 7 Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#9 Page 441 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the District levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Fiscal Year 2018/19 Budget Expenditures Personnel Services: Regular Salaries $ 3,320 Fringe Benefits 1,560 Subtotal - Personnel 4,880 Operations and Maintenance: Operations and Maintenance: O & M/General 2,250 Contract Services: Contract Services/General 10,180 Tree Maintenance 3,720 Subtotal - Contract Services 13,900 Utilities: Water Utilities 6,390 Electric Utilities 1,450 Subtotal - Utilities 7,840 Assessment Administration 950 Adm in./General Overhead 7,630 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 32,570 Total Expenditures Budget $ 37,450 Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#9 Page 442 Fiscal Year 2018/19 Budget Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies $ 33,920 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 380 Subtotal - Taxes 34,300 Other Revenues: Interest Earnings 1,000 Total Revenues Budget $ 35,300 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ (2,150) Total Gross Estimated Assessments $ 34,261.02 Total District EBU Count 226.22 Actual Assessment per EBU - Fiscal Year 2018/19 $ 151.45 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU - Fiscal Year 2018/19 $ 151.45 The maximum allowable assessment per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved when the District was formed, and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however, it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Operating Reserve Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2018 $ 68,396 Contribution to Reserve - Fiscal Year 2018/19 (2,150) Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2019 $ 66,246 Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#9 Page 443 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time and part-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Additionally, this includes benefits available to City employees. Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District. Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Utilities: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity, water, and telephone services, as required, for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers in the District. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost of all particular departments and staff of the City, as well as consultants, for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual Engineer's Report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all central services departments of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational District within the City's administrative structure. Capital Outlay: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Other Revenues: This includes other revenues that are not levied through the annual assessments that support the District operations. These other revenues may include: interest earnings, other rental/lease income (cell site tower leases), Park Maintenance Fees, Sports Field User Group Rentals, and parking permits (Metrolink Station paid parking). Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#9 Page 444 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Overview Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 commencing with Section 5000) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]. Section 22547 of the 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement". Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights -of -ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#9 Page 445 General Benefit Section 4 of Article XIII D of the California Constitution provides that once a local agency which proposes to impose assessments on property has identified those parcels that will have special benefits conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed, the local agency must next "separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred," and only the special benefits can be included in the amount of the assessments imposed. In this District, the improvements being financed consists of the maintenance of local improvements located within the boundaries of the District and include paseos, street trees, landscaped areas and appurtenant facilities that are located throughout the District and were installed to create a common landscape theme and neighborhood identity for parcels within the District. The improvements are situated within the public rights-of-way of the internal local street network within the District which provides ingress and egress for parcels within the District to access the City's system of arterial streets. City residents and traffic from parcels not within the District do not use the internal local street network or paseos except for the express purpose of accessing properties located within the District, and therefore do not benefit from the improvements. Only parcels which are within the District and proximate to the improvements and within the District are being assessed. Accordingly, there is a direct physical and visual nexus between each parcel being assessed and the improvements to be funded by the assessment that does not exist for parcels outside of the District boundary and that is particular and distinct from that shared by the public at large. Under these circumstances, all of the benefits conferred are direct and local in nature, and provide a benefit to only those parcels located within the boundaries of the District. Based upon this, it has been determined that there is no quantifiable general benefit to the surrounding community and the public in general from the maintenance of the improvements within the boundaries of the District, and therefore no portion of the project costs should be attributed to general benefit. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District and, as such, confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#9 Page 446 The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District, only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements is identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The EBU method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one EBU. Every other land -use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land -use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land -use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land -Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Property Type (County Use Code) EBU Value Multiplier Single Family Residential 1.00 Parcel Non -Residential 2.00 Acre The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#9 Page 447 The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2018/19 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the San Bernardino County Assessor Office, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#9 Page 448 Maximum Allowable Actual Assessment Asessment Rate Total Property Type (County Use Code) Rate per EBU per EBU Units/Acres Total EBUs Single Family Residential $151.45 $151.45 199.00 199.00 Non -Residential 151.45 151.45 13.61 27.22 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the San Bernardino County Assessor Office, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#9 Page 448 :C V3 1t 6$I'Vi flflfld 3 isle s.r 'J-zag.j� IAN dal;s� :ia g�saa'�Q� pp € s �� }ids aQs ��Qg�g}}383 i��sg3�3g �zi93aS$5845 2 W y Q v CD ca 7 D o n �p ...._�� O ? N N W (n Grove Av ;_.._..---•—••�.� CD %� ._..� 4,; Carnelian St Vineyard Av rn A S Hellman Av s Archibald Av ! 1 Hermosa Av i Haven Av! Milliken Av Rochester Av Etiwanda Av 11 s East Av r.� U) r M o a OD r 3 D o p O W S y co -- W r m CL CL Cherry Av Rochester Av ........... ._.._. Day Creek Etiwanda Av Hellman Av Archibald Av Hermosa Av Haven Av I Milliken Av Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#9 Page 449 ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2018/19 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2018/19 actual assessments for the District: Property Type (County Use Code) Actual Assessment Rate per EBU Total Units/Acres Total EBUs Total Assessment Single Family Residential $151.45 199.00 199.00 $30,138.55 Non -Residential 151.451 13.61 27.221 4,122.47 Totals 1 212.61 226.22 $34,261.02 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations There were no effective annexations for Fiscal Year 2018/19. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#9 Page 450 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2018/19 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 (Lower Etiwanda) Page 451 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 9 (LOWER ETIWANDA) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2700 Fax: 909.477.2849 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Lynne B. Kennedy, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Sam Spagnolo, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director Page 452 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER 1 INTRODUCTION 3 Reason for Assessment 3 Process for Annual Assessment 3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 4 Description of the Boundaries of the District 4 Description of Improvements and Services 4 Map of Improvements 7 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 9 District Budget 9 Definitions of Budget Items 11 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 12 Overview 12 General Benefit 13 Special Benefit 13 Method of Assessment Spread 14 Cost of Living Inflator 15 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM 16 ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS 18 Assessment Roll 18 Annexations 18 Page 453 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July 18, 2018, the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 18-053, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 (Lower Etiwanda) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed staff to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2018/19 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. Expenditures Personnel Services Operations and Maintenance Capital Expenditures Total Expenditures Budget Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection Subtotal - Taxes Other Revenues Total Revenues Budget Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance Total District EBU Count Actual Assessment per EBU Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 — City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2018/19 Fiscal Year 2018/19 Budget $ 321,230 327,100 501,000 1,149,330 507,940 1,380 509,320 18,890 528,210 $ (621,120) 2,165.56 $ 236.92 $ 587.74 1 ATTACHMENT#10 Page 454 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. 2. 1 have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, I certify that the Annual Engineer's Report and Assessment Diagram included herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#10 Page 455 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement or facility such as paseos, community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, and providing for the growth, vigor and care of the trees and landscape plant materials. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting of landscape or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the District for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the District by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the District. • Refers to the Engineer's Report, on file with the City Clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the City Clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#10 Page 456 hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including the improvements, to the zones within the District, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to, the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area known as Lower Etiwanda, which is south of Victoria St, north of Foothill Blvd, generally east of Etiwanda Ave and the 1-15 Freeway and west of East Ave. Typically, parcels have been annexed to the District as they have developed. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements maintained by the District include the paseos, community trails, trees, landscaped sites and appurtenant facilities that are throughout the District. These improvements are located within the street right-of-ways and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, the pruning, fertilizing, mowing, weeding, pest control, removal of trash/debris, and irrigation of the trees, shrubs, vines, ground cover, and turf. Maintenance of associated improvements and facilities, such as community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, includes but is not limited to, grading and replacement of trail surfacing, trail fence repair and replacement, steel fence painting, repair and replacement, and irrigation systems control, adjustment, trouble -shooting, Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#10 Page 457 repair and replacement. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, capital projects and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Parks: Garcia Park (formerly known as South Etiwanda Park). Site # Descriptive Location 9-1 The west side of East Ave from 380 feet north of Chateau Dr to 290 feet south of Chateau Dr. Ground Cover area: 7,244 square feet Hardscape area: 7,525 square feet 9-2 The west side of East Ave from 339 feet north of Brookfield Dr to 157 north of Brookfield Dr. Brookfield Dr from East Ave to Oakcrest Ct. The east side of Oakcrest Ct to 137 feet north of Brookfield Dr. Ground Cover area: 2,390 square feet Hardscape area: 6,874 square feet 9-3 The west side of East Ave from 790 feet north of Highfield Dr to 256 feet south of Highfield Dr. Ground Cover area: 8,769 square feet Hardscape area: 10,669 square feet 9-4 The west side of East Ave from 295 feet north of Via Veneto Dr To Via Veneto Dr. The north side of Via Veneto Dr From East Ave to Dolcetto PI. The east side of Dolcetto PI from Via Veneto Dr to Miller Ave. The south side of Miller Ave from 372 feet west of Dolcetto PI to 240 feet east of Dolcetto PI. The west side of Dolcetto PI from Miller Ave to Garcia Dr. The north side of Garcia Dr from Dolcetto PI to Etiwanda Ave. Ground Cover area: 48,612 square feet Hardscape area: 28,746 square feet 9-5 The north side of Miller Ave from 429 feet west of Dolcetto PI to 1029 feet west of Dolcetto PI. Ground Cover area: 6,519 square feet Hardscape area: 3,325 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#10 Page 458 9-6 The north side of Miller Ave from 254 feet east of Dolcetto PI to 167 feet west of Dolcetto PI. Ground Cover area: 4,089 square feet Hardscape area: 2,854 square feet 9-8 The south side of Base Line Rd from Etiwanda Ave to Shelby PI. The Base Line Rd median from Etiwanda Ave to 473 feet east of Shelby PI. Ground Cover area: 16,395 square feet Hardscape area: 14,558 square feet 9-9 The north side of Candlewood St from Exbury PI to Etiwanda Ave. Ground Cover area: 3,362 square feet Hardscape area: 786 square feet 9-10 The north side of Base Line Rd from 522 feet east of Forester PI to 180 feet west of Forester PI. The Base Line Rd median from 503 feet east of Forester PI to 200 feet west of Forester PI. Ground Cover area: 16,930 square feet Hardscape area: 13,600 square feet 9-11 The north side of Mueller Ct from 40 feet past the east end of Mueller Ct to 20 feet east of Dicarlo PI. Ground Cover area: 9,420 square feet Hardscape area: 742 square feet 9-12 The north and south sides of Highland Ave from 217 feet west of Norcia Dr to 210 feet east of Dicarlo PI. Ground Cover area: 12,471 square feet Hardscape area: 14,445 square feet 9-13 The south side of Carnesi Dr from Etiwanda Ave to 395 feet east of Murietta Ct. Ground Cover area: 8,919 square feet Hardscape area: 6,203 square feet 9-14 The west side of East Ave from 665 feet north of Miller Ave to Miller Ave. The north side of Miller Ave from East Ave to 667 feet west of East Ave. Ground Cover area: 9,150 square feet Hardscape area: 16,226 square feet 9-15 The north side of Base Line Rd from Shelby PI to 343 feet east of Shelby PI. Ground Cover area: 3,480 square feet Hardscape area: 4,638 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#10 Page 459 9-16 The east side of Dolcetto PI from Garcia Dr to Via Veneto Dr. The south side of Via Veneto Dr from Dolcetto PI to East Ave. The west side of East Ave from Via Veneto Dr to 276 feet south of Via Veneto Dr. Ground Cover area: 16,310 square feet Hardscape area: 13,411 square feet 9-17 The east side of Etiwanda Ave from 145 feet south of Miller Ave to Miller Ave. The south side of Miller Ave from Etiwanda Ave to Three Vines PI. Ground Cover area: 7,535 square feet Hardscape area: 6,130 square feet FH -17 The Foothill Blvd median from Etiwanda Ave to Cornwell Ct. Ground Cover area: 8,275 square feet Ground cover, shrubs and turf areas that make up parkways, median islands and paseos are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company. Parks are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crews. Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#10 Page 460 1. I9 u. R oc hester Av i i I O A 'd r Day Creek BI • •.' U � In n -- - --- -----Etiwanda Etiwand—�� rF a Av —�� T V CO �o V V N ■ � ,N p cD East Av n ------- �_--- �--�-- --- — � Ire ----� �------ � /}� z Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#10 Page 461 I o2)CD2) :z 3 N CD CD W z Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#10 Page 461 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the District levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#10 Page 462 Fiscal Year 2018/19 Budget Expenditures Personnel Services: Regular Salaries $ 201,390 Part-time Salaries 21,200 Fringe Benefits 98,640 Subtotal - Personnel 321,230 Operations and Maintenance: Operations and Maintenance: O & M/General 30,510 Cellular Technology 2,740 Emergency Equipment and Vehicle Rental 1,200 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 34,450 Contract Services: Contract Services/General 132,160 Tree Maintenance 33,930 Subtotal - Contract Services 166,090 Utilities: Water Utilities 56,580 Electric Utilities 9,590 Subtotal - Utilities 66,170 Assessment Administration 6,890 Admin./General Overhead 53,500 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 327,100 Capital Expenditures: Captial Outlay - Equipment 1,000 Captial Project 500,000 Subtotal - Capital Expenditures 501,000 Total Expenditures Budget $ 1,149,330 Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#10 Page 462 Fiscal Year 2018/19 Budget Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies $ 507,940 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 1,380 Subtotal - Taxes 509,320 Other Revenues: Interest Earnings 16,390 Park Maintenance Fees 2,000 Sports Field User Group Rentals 500 Subtotal - Other Revenues: 18,890 Total Revenues Budget $ 528,210 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ (621,120) Total Gross Estimated Assessments $ 513,064.48 Total District EBU Count 2,165.56 Actual Assessment per EBU - Fiscal Year 2018/19 $ 236.92 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU - Fiscal Year 2018/19 $ 587.74 Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however, it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Operating Reserve Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2018 $ 1,204,057 Contribution to Reserve - Fiscal Year 2018/19 (621,120) Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2019 $ 582,937 Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#10 Page 463 The City has reserve funds that are more than sufficient to cover an estimated six months' worth of maintenance and servicing costs for the District. When there are excess funds in the District's reserve account, the excess can be used to lower the annual levy to property owners within the District. The City will continue to annually review the estimated costs and expenses for the District as well as reserve fund levels, in order to determine if future levies can be reduced as well. Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time and part-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Additionally, this includes benefits available to City employees. Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District. Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Utilities: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity, water, and telephone services, as required, for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers in the District. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost of all particular departments and staff of the City, as well as consultants, for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual Engineer's Report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all central services departments of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational District within the City's administrative structure. Capital Outlay: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#10 Page 464 Other Revenues: This includes other revenues that are not levied through the annual assessments that support the District operations. These other revenues may include: interest earnings, other rental/lease income (cell site tower leases), Park Maintenance Fees, Sports Field User Group Rentals, and parking permits (Metrolink Station paid parking). METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Overview Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D. all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 commencing with Section 5000) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]. Section 22547 of the 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement". Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights -of -ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#10 Page 465 The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. General Benefit Section 4 of Article XIII D of the California Constitution provides that once a local agency which proposes to impose assessments on property has identified those parcels that will have special benefits conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed, the local agency must next "separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred," and only the special benefits can be included in the amount of the assessments imposed. In this District, the improvements being financed consists of the maintenance of local improvements located within the boundaries of the District and include paseos, street trees, landscaped areas and appurtenant facilities that are located throughout the District and were installed to create a common landscape theme and neighborhood identity for parcels within the District. The improvements are situated within the public rights-of-way of the internal local street network within the District which provides ingress and egress for parcels within the District to access the City's system of arterial streets. City residents and traffic from parcels not within the District do not use the internal local street network or paseos except for the express purpose of accessing properties located within the District, and therefore do not benefit from the improvements. Only parcels which are within the District and proximate to the improvements and within the Assessment District are being assessed. Accordingly, there is a direct physical and visual nexus between each parcel being assessed and the improvements to be funded by the assessment that does not exist for parcels outside of the District boundary and that is particular and distinct from that shared by the public at large. Under these circumstances, all of the benefits conferred are direct and local in nature, and provide a benefit to only those parcels located within the boundaries of the District. Based upon this, it has been determined that there is no quantifiable general benefit to the surrounding community and the public in general from the maintenance of the improvements within the boundaries of the District, and therefore no portion of the project costs should be attributed to general benefit. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District and, as such, confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#10 Page 466 • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District, only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements is identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The EBU method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one EBU. Every other land -use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land -use}, and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land -use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land -Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Property Type (County Use Code) EBU Value Multiplier Single Family Residential 1.00 Parcel Multi -Family Residential 1.00 Unit Non -Residential 2.00 Acre The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#10 Page 467 The following summarizes the Fiscal Year 2018/19 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Cost of Living Inflator Each fiscal year beginning with Fiscal Year 2001/02, the maximum allowable assessment may be increased each year, based upon the Consumer Price Index ("CPI"), All Urban Consumers, for the Los Angeles -Anaheim -San Bernardino Area, as determined by the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, or its successor. The Engineer shall compute the percentage difference between the CPI for March of each year and the CPI for the previous March, and shall then adjust the existing assessment by an amount not to exceed such percentage for the following fiscal year. Should the Bureau of Labor Statistics revise such index or discontinue the preparation of such index, the Engineer shall use the revised index or a comparable system as approved by the City Council for determining fluctuations in the cost of living. If for any reason the percentage change is negative the maximum allowable assessment would not be decreased by reason of such negative percentage change and would remain at the amount as computed on the previous fiscal year regardless of any CPI adjustment. The annual assessment cannot exceed the actual costs to operate the District in any given year. If operating costs are such that the maximum assessment amount is not needed, the City would levy only what is needed for that year. The Fiscal Year 2018/19 actual assessment rate will increase from $140.00 to $236.92 per single-family residence, the rate was increased due to the district's shrinking fund balance. The goal of the City is to ensure that the district has a reserve fund balance equal to one year's district expenditures. The City will continue to annually review the estimated costs and expenses for the District as well as reserve fund levels, in order to determine if future levies can be reduced as well. Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#10 Page 468 Maximum Allowable Actual Assessment Asessment Rate Total Property Type (County Use Code) Rate per EBU per EBU Units/Acres Total EBUs Single Family Residential $587.74 $236.92 1,072.00 1,072.00 Multi -Family Residential 587.74 236.92 1,057.00 1,057.00 Non -Residential 587.74 236.92 18.28 36.56 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Cost of Living Inflator Each fiscal year beginning with Fiscal Year 2001/02, the maximum allowable assessment may be increased each year, based upon the Consumer Price Index ("CPI"), All Urban Consumers, for the Los Angeles -Anaheim -San Bernardino Area, as determined by the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, or its successor. The Engineer shall compute the percentage difference between the CPI for March of each year and the CPI for the previous March, and shall then adjust the existing assessment by an amount not to exceed such percentage for the following fiscal year. Should the Bureau of Labor Statistics revise such index or discontinue the preparation of such index, the Engineer shall use the revised index or a comparable system as approved by the City Council for determining fluctuations in the cost of living. If for any reason the percentage change is negative the maximum allowable assessment would not be decreased by reason of such negative percentage change and would remain at the amount as computed on the previous fiscal year regardless of any CPI adjustment. The annual assessment cannot exceed the actual costs to operate the District in any given year. If operating costs are such that the maximum assessment amount is not needed, the City would levy only what is needed for that year. The Fiscal Year 2018/19 actual assessment rate will increase from $140.00 to $236.92 per single-family residence, the rate was increased due to the district's shrinking fund balance. The goal of the City is to ensure that the district has a reserve fund balance equal to one year's district expenditures. The City will continue to annually review the estimated costs and expenses for the District as well as reserve fund levels, in order to determine if future levies can be reduced as well. Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#10 Page 468 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the San Bernardino County Assessor Office, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 16 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#10 Page 469 q�i��Yi 9�:cs i a aga4;i:° m o0 g o 991 ;c° � R. O 5 (S Fla --5} -C= r s . 31 S''RBill,. CD Yc3Grove Av ,_.._..=--• g _..�� g34 a3 S3-9 a , Q r'. Vineyard Av j rn Hellman Avg Archibald Av Hermosa Av Haven Av! 1 1 1 Milliken Av Rochester Av Etiwanda Av U i i i� Hermosa Av i r� i Haven Av I 1 CD 1 ,_.._.._.,_.._.J Milliken Av L� p Rochester Av M (n i n i C1 Etiwanda Av i CL (D E r 3 N ..............0 U, U �n � < D o 0 0 00 CD CD a Cherry Av wo 0'sz a� yI�w Carnelian St I IHellman Av i i Archibald Av Hermosa Av i i Haven Av I 1 1 ,_.._.._.,_.._.J Milliken Av Rochester Av ay Creek BI 1 (n i n i C1 Etiwanda Av i i (D r ..............0 CD �n � < d �. 0 W Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 17 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#10 Page 470 ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2018/19 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2018/19 actual assessments for the District: Property Type (County Use Code) Actual Assessment Rate per EBU Total Units/Acres Total EBUs Total Assessment Single Family Residential $236.92 1,072.00 1,072.00 $253,978.24 Multi -Family Residential $236.92 1,057.00 1,057.00 250,424.44 Non -Residential $236.921 18.281 36.561 $8,661.80 Totals 1 1 2,147.281 2,165.561 $513,064.48 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations There are no effective annexations for Fiscal Year 2018/19. Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 18 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#10 Page 471 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2018/19 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 (Rancho Etiwanda) Page 472 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 10 (RANCHO ETIWANDA) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2700 Fax: 909.477.2849 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Lynne B. Kennedy, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Sam Spagnolo, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director Page 473 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER 1 INTRODUCTION 3 Reason for Assessment 3 Process for Annual Assessment 3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 4 Description of the Boundaries of the District 4 Description of Improvements and Services 4 Map of Improvements 7 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 9 District Budget 9 Definitions of Budget Items 11 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 12 Overview 12 General Benefit 13 Special Benefit 13 Method of Assessment Spread 14 Cost of Living Inflator 15 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM 15 ASSESSMENT ROLL and ANNEXATIONS 17 Assessment Roll 17 Annexations 17 Page 474 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July 18, 2018, the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 18-053, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 (Rancho Etiwanda) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed staff to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2018/19 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. Fiscal Year 2018/19 Budget Expenditures Personnel Services $ 270,660 Operations and Maintenance 424,170 Capital Expenditures 2,000 Total Expenditures Budget 696,830 Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection Subtotal - Taxes Other Revenues Total Revenues Budget Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance Total District EBU Count Actual Assessment per EBU Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 — City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2018/19 573,200 6,750 579,950 40,770 620,720 $ (76,110) 786.00 $ 736.62 $ 904.44 1 ATTACHMENT#11 Page 475 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. 2. 1 have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, I certify that the Annual Engineer's Report and Assessment Diagram included herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#11 Page 476 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement or facility such as paseos, community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, and providing for the growth, vigor and care of the trees and landscape plant materials. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting of landscape or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the District for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the District by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the District. • Refers to the Engineer's Report, on file with the City Clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the City Clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#11 Page 477 hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including the improvements, to the zones within the District, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to, the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area known as Rancho Etiwanda, which lies north of the 210 Freeway, east of Day Creek Channel, and west of Bluegrass Ave. Typically parcels have been annexed to the District as they have developed. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements maintained by the District include the paseos, community trails, trees, landscaped sites and appurtenant facilities that are throughout the District. These improvements are located within the street right-of-ways and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, the pruning, fertilizing, mowing, weeding, pest control, removal of trash/debris, and irrigation of the trees, shrubs, vines, ground cover, and turf. Maintenance of associated improvements and facilities, such as community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, includes but is not limited to, grading and replacement of trail surfacing, trail fence repair and replacement, steel fence painting, repair and replacement, and irrigation systems control, adjustment, trouble -shooting, Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#11 Page 478 repair and replacement. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, capital projects and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Parks: Day Creek Park. Site # Descriptive Location 10-1 The west side of Day Creek Blvd from 790 feet north of Richfield Dr to Wilson Ave. The north side of Wilson Ave from Day Creek Blvd to 227 feet west of Day Creek Blvd. This site overlaps 10-2. Ground Cover area: 16,941 square feet Hardscape area: 3,589 square feet 10-2 The north and south side of Wilson Ave from 497 feet west of Alvarado PI to Day Creek Blvd. The south side of Wilson Ave from Day Creek Blvd to Bluegrass Ave. The Wilson Ave median from Day Creek Blvd to Bluegrass Ave. Ground Cover area: 47,275 square feet Hardscape area: 6,444 square feet 10-3 The west side of Day Creek Blvd from Wilson Ave to 144 feet south of Clydesdale Dr. The Day Creek Blvd median from Wilson Ave to Banyan St. Ground Cover area: 32,619 square feet Hardscape area: 10,983 square feet 10-4 10-5 The east side of Day Creek Blvd from 648 feet south of Keenland Dr to Wilson Ave. Ground Cover area: 15,952 square feet Hardscape area: 4,365 square feet The west side of Bluegrass Ave from Wilson Ave to 705 feet south of Challendon Dr. Ground Cover area: 26,882 square feet Hardscape area: 12,220 square feet 10-6 The south side of Banyan St from Rochester Ave to Day Creek Blvd. The north side of Banyan St from 427 feet west of Rocking Horse PI to Rocking Horse PI. The west side of Day Creek Blvd from Banyan St to Vintage Dr. The north side of Vintage Dr from Day Creek Blvd to the paseo ending 153 feet west of Sandhill PI. Ground Cover area: 44,000 square feet Hardscape area: 16,197 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#11 Page 479 10-7 The north side of Vintage Dr from 180 feet east of Taylor Canon PI to Day Creek Blvd. The east side of Day Creek Blvd from Vintage Dr to Banyan St. The south side of Banyan St from Day Creek Blvd to Bluegrass Ave. Ground Cover area: 22,164 square feet Hardscape area: 11,724 square feet 10-8 The landscape against the south side facing wall north of the 210 freeway from the top of the slope on the east side of Day Creek Blvd to 300 feet eastward. The Day Creek Blvd median from the 210 freeway to Vintage Dr. The east side of Day Creek Blvd from Caltrans ROW to Vintage Dr. The south side of Vintage Dr from Day Creek Blvd to 180 feet east of Taylor Canyon PI. Ground Cover area: 16,841 square feet Hardscape area: 7,025 square feet 10-9 The north side of Coyote Dr from Brookstone PI to Day Creek Blvd. The east side of Day Creek Blvd from Coyote Dr to 358 feet north of Coyote Dr. The west side of Day Creek Blvd from 118 feet north of Coyote Dr to 380 feet north of Coyote Dr. Ground Cover area: 9,403 square feet Hardscape area: 6,052 square feet 10-10 The north side of Wilson Ave from 395 feet east of Day Creek Blvd to Day Creek Blvd. The east side of Day Creek Blvd from Wilson Ave to Blackstone Dr. The south side of Blackstone Dr from Day Creek Blvd to Stoneview Rd. The north side of Blackstone Dr from Day Creek Blvd to 165 feet west of Stoneview Rd. Ground Cover area: 26,304 square feet Hardscape area: 19,117 square feet 10-11 The west side of Day Creek Blvd from 340 feet north of Banyan St to Banyan St. The north side of Banyan St from Day Creek Blvd to Rocking Horse PI. Ground Cover area: 20,378 square feet Hardscape area: 11,212 square feet 10-12 The paseo on the east side of Stoneview Rd across from Duncaster PI. Ground Cover area: 3,326 square feet Hardscape area: 2,374 square feet 10-13 The west side of Day Creek Blvd from 340 feet south of Vintage Dr to 915 feet south of Vintage Dr. Ground Cover area: 27,416 square feet Hardscape area: 16,167 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#11 Page 480 10-14 The south side of Vintage Dr from Saddle Tree PI to Day Creek Blvd. The west side of Day Creek Blvd from Vintage Dr to 325 feet south of Vintage Dr. Ground Cover area: 7,777 square feet Hardscape area: 8,101 square feet *This sites irrigation pump and valves are powered from site 10-13 Ground cover, shrubs and turf areas that make up parkways, median islands and paseos are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company. Parks are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crews. Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#11 Page 481 IJ N 9 j o Rill� a' risinq 'o I WC :3_I I S 3 lS��aaSi�fd? i — 0jJF Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#11 Page 482 0 — 0jJF Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#11 Page 482 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the District levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Operations and Maintenance: Fiscal Year Operations and Maintenance: 2018/19 Budget Expenditures 21,400 Personnel Services: 1,500 Regular Salaries $ 158,180 Overtime Salaries $ 1,050 Part-time Salaries 31,110 Fringe Benefits 80,320 Subtotal - Personnel 270,660 Operations and Maintenance: Operations and Maintenance: O & M/General 21,400 O & M/Facilities 1,500 Emergency Equipment and Vehicle Rental 2,000 Equip Operations & Maint 500 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 25,400 Contract Services: Contract Services/General 189,490 Contract Sery/Facilities 3,950 Tree Maintenance 11,800 Subtotal - Contract Services 205,240 Utilities: Water Utilities 98,900 Electric Utilities 20,080 Subtotal - Utilities 118,980 Assessment Administration 4,120 Admin./General Overhead 69,780 Misc Contributions to City 650 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 424,170 Capital Expenditures: Captial Outlay - Equipment 2,000 Total Expenditures Budget $ 696,830 Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#11 Page 483 Fiscal Year 2018/19 Budget Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies $ 573,200 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 6,750 Subtotal - Taxes 579,950 Other Revenues: Interest Earnings 16,000 Other Rental/Lease Income 7,500 Park Maintenance Fees 4,740 Sports Field User Group Rentals 2,000 Sports Lighting Fees 7,030 Other Revenue 3,500 Subtotal - Other Revenues: 40,770 Total Revenues Budget $ 620,720 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ (76,110) Total Gross Estimated Assessments $ 578,983.32 Total District EBU Count 786.00 Actual Assessment per EBU - Fiscal Year 2018/19 $ 736.62 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU - Fiscal Year 2018/19 $ 904.44 Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however, it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Operating Reserve Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2018 $ 1,152,514 Contribution to Reserve - Fiscal Year 2018/19 (76,110) Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2019 $ 1,076,404 Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#11 Page 484 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time and part-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Additionally, this includes benefits available to City employees. Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District. Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Utilities: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity, water, and telephone services, as required, for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers in the District. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost of all particular departments and staff of the City, as well as consultants, for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual Engineer's Report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all central services departments of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational District within the City's administrative structure. Capital Outlay: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Other Revenues: This includes other revenues that are not levied through the annual assessments that support the District operations. These other revenues may include: interest earnings, other rental/lease income (cell site tower leases), Park Maintenance Fees, Sports Field User Group Rentals, and parking permits (Metrolink Station paid parking). Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#11 Page 485 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Overview Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D. all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 commencing with Section 5000) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]. Section 22547 of the 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement". Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights -of -ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#11 Page 486 General Benefit Section 4 of Article XIII D of the California Constitution provides that once a local agency which proposes to impose assessments on property has identified those parcels that will have special benefits conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed, the local agency must next "separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred," and only the special benefits can be included in the amount of the assessments imposed. In this District, the improvements being financed consists of the maintenance of local improvements located within the boundaries of the District and include paseos, street trees, landscaped areas and appurtenant facilities that are located throughout the District and were installed to create a common landscape theme and neighborhood identity for parcels within the District. The improvements are situated within the public rights-of-way of the internal local street network within the District which provides ingress and egress for parcels within the District to access the City's system of arterial streets. City residents and traffic from parcels not within the District do not use the internal local street network or paseos except for the express purpose of accessing properties located within the District, and therefore do not benefit from the improvements. Only parcels which are within the District and proximate to the improvements and within the District are being assessed. Accordingly, there is a direct physical and visual nexus between each parcel being assessed and the improvements to be funded by the assessment that does not exist for parcels outside of the District boundary and that is particular and distinct from that shared by the public at large. Under these circumstances, all of the benefits conferred are direct and local in nature, and provide a benefit to only those parcels located within the boundaries of the District. Based upon this, it has been determined that there is no quantifiable general benefit to the surrounding community and the public in general from the maintenance of the improvements within the boundaries of the District, and therefore no portion of the project costs should be attributed to general benefit. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District and, as such, confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#11 Page 487 share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District, only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements is identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The EBU method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one EBU. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land -Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Property Type (County Use Code) EBU Value Multiplier Single Family Residential 1.00 Parcel The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following summarizes the Fiscal Year 2018/19 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Maximum Allowable Actual Assessment Asessment Rate Total Property Type (County Use Code) Rate per EBU per EBU Units/Acres Total EBUs Single Family Residential $904.44 $736.62 786.00 786.00 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#11 Page 488 District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Cost of Living Inflator Each fiscal year beginning with Fiscal Year 2002/03, the maximum allowable assessment may increase each year, based upon the Consumer Price Index ("CPI"), All Urban Consumers, for the Los Angeles -Anaheim -San Bernardino Area, as determined by the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, or its successor. The Engineer shall compute the percentage difference between the CPI for March of each year and the CPI for the previous March, and shall then adjust the existing assessment by an amount not to exceed such percentage for the following fiscal year. Should the Bureau of Labor Statistics revise such index or discontinue the preparation of such index, the Engineer shall use the revised index or a comparable system as approved by the City Council for determining fluctuations in the cost of living. If for any reason the percentage change is negative the maximum allowable assessment would not be decreased by reason of such negative percentage change and would remain at the amount as computed on the previous fiscal year regardless of any CPI adjustment. The annual assessment cannot exceed the actual costs to operate the District in any given year. If operating costs are such that the maximum assessment amount is not needed, the City would levy only what is needed for that year. The actual assessment rate for Fiscal Year 2018/19 will increase from $711.71 to $736.62 per single-family residence, a rate increase of 3.5% as compared to Fiscal Year 2017/18. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the San Bernardino County Assessor Office, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#11 Page 489 �a�adi:$t3�i' u'a ani 7g �-.tea �gp3Sg`si$g}i 9gR-a �gQua �aePt� a��ii< g3�fis,9g90 W N a CD �g �gda�bgag' D o W = a s?Q3�y Grove Av a 9Iisgs39.q gCL �g o s 'QlI.a1gsa CD Vineyard Av rn A =r CO Hellman Av Y, Archibald Av 1 Hermosa Av j i Haven Av! Milliken Av I Rochester Av K i r i Rochester Av e ! T 1 Etiwanda Av : Etiwanda Av i �O East Av D m °o o s � CD 00 cD _r r N C CD � d j_.._.. _.._.._t t0 Cherry Av C M jO Q 1 D C7 o 3. N rJ� u Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 — City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2018/19 Carnelian St I Hellman Av Archibald Av Hermosa Av Haven Av Milliken Av 16 ATTACHMENT#11 Page 490 ASSESSMENT ROLL and ANNEXATIONS Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2018/19 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2018/19 actual assessment for the District: A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations There were no effective annexations for Fiscal Year 2018/19. Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 17 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#11 Page 491 Actual Assessment Total Property Type (County Use Code) Rate per EBU Units/Acres Total EBUs Total Assessment Single Family Residential $736.62 786.00 786.00 $578,983.32 Totals 786.00 786.00 $578,983.32 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations There were no effective annexations for Fiscal Year 2018/19. Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 17 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#11 Page 491 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2018/19 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterials) Page 492 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIALS) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2700 Fax: 909.477.2849 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Lynne B. Kennedy, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Sam Spagnolo, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director Page 493 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER 1 INTRODUCTION 3 Reason for Assessment 3 Process for Annual Assessment 3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 4 Description of the Boundaries of the District 4 Description of Improvements and Services 4 Map of Improvements 5 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 7 District Budget 7 Definitions of Budget Items 9 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 10 Overview 10 Special Benefit 11 General Benefit 11 Method of Assessment Spread 11 ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS 15 Assessment Roll 15 Annexations 15 Page 494 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July 18, 2018, the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 18-056, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed the City Engineer to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2018/19 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay for the acquisition of street lights, the installation of Light Emitting Diode (LED) street lighting, and estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. Fiscal Year 2018/19 Budget Expenditures Personnel Services $ 20,770 Operations and Maintenance 537,090 Debt Service 240,040 Transfer Out 47,880 Total Expenditures Budget 845,780 Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies 808,040 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 6,750 Subtotal - Taxes 814,790 Other Revenues 2,520 Total Revenues Budget 817,310 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ (28,470) Total District EBU Count 45,931.12 Actual Assessment per EBU $ 17.77 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU $ 17.77 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#12 Page 495 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. 2. 1 have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirely of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, I certify that the Annual Engineer's Report and Assessment Diagram included herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#12 Page 496 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements, the installation of LED street lighting, and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the District for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the District by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the District. • Refers to the Engineer's Report, on file with the City Clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the City Clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#12 Page 497 During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including the improvements, to the zones within the District, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing, must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to, the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as the entire City of Rancho Cucamonga. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of street lights, traffic signals and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The maintenance and servicing includes, but is not limited to, furnishing electric current for public lighting facilities including street lights and traffic signals, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in operational and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, in order to lower expenses of the District. In Fiscal Year 2017/18, the acquisition by the City of the street lights and installation of LED street lighting specially benefiting the properties within the District has been added to the improvements. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#12 Page 498 Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of street light and traffic signal improvements to be maintained using District funds. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#12 Page 499 Grove Av�— !" T ! t � a3 s 9 i • Vineyard AV A � � N � i • Hellman AV � Archibald AV ' • Hermosa AV A Haven v f Milliken AV Rochester AV ^l� d A L—a � • Carnelian St ��••e �••N ••. �•� i it I ' ••• raw • M• ••• •w M • Hellman Ave ''AA •w i v/ so ••r .0aaaa •0••I Archibald AV MrY•� HermosaAv III /�"�►►►�^iii �•• ra•y Haven AV • • I II Milliken AV • • O i �• k BI I q. 0111, • v 0 g F `\ T u n Cherry AV f 0 D 0 � Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#12 Page 500 Etiwanda AV� ••ri ••M E t iii I vi N j � • i O East AV L-- ---- _— a•i East AV r p C7 m D 3 \ I N. 0 g F `\ T u n Cherry AV f 0 D 0 � Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#12 Page 500 N (D cin cin � r p C7 m p- r CD CD V) (D (D N 0 g F `\ T u n Cherry AV f 0 D 0 � Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#12 Page 500 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the District levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 - City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#12 Page 501 Fiscal Year 2018/19 Budget Expenditures Personnel Services: Regular Salaries $ 14,130 Fringe Benefits 6,640 Subtotal - Personnel 20,770 Operations and Maintenance: Training 180 Membership Dues 50 O & M/General 7,990 Cellular Technology 2,000 Equipment Operations and Maintenance 500 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 10,720 Contract Services 47,750 Utilities: Telephone Utilities 1,500 Electric Utilities 290,000 Subtotal - Utilities 291,500 Assessment Administration 136,890 Admin./General Overhead 50,230 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 537,090 Debt Service: Interest Expense 37,730 Principal Repayments 202,310 Subtotal - Debt Service 240,040 Transfer Out - General City Street Lights Fund 47,880 Total Expenditures Budget $ 845,780 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 - City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#12 Page 501 Fiscal Year 2018/19 Budget Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies $ 808,040 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 6,750 Subtotal - Taxes 814,790 Other Revenues: Interest Earnings 1,520 Developer Energizing Fee 1,000 Subtotal - Other Revenues: 2,520 Total Revenues Budget $ 817,310 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ (28,470) Total Gross Estimated Assessments $ 816,196.05 Total District EBU Count 45,931.12 Actual Assessment per EBU - Fiscal Year 2018/19 $17.77 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU - Fiscal Year 2018/19 $17.77 The maximum allowable assessment per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in Fiscal Year 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the total amount of funds needed to maintain the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however, it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2018 Contribution to Reserve - Fiscal Year 2018/19 Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2019 Operating Reserve $ 272,892 (28,470) $ 244,422 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2018/19 8 ATTACHMENT#12 Page 502 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time and part-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Additionally, this includes benefits available to City employees. Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District. Utilities: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity and telephone services, as required, for the operation and maintenance of the street lights, traffic signals, and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual Engineer's Report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all central services departments of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational District within the City's administrative structure. Capital Outlay: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include installation of safety lights and other large improvements. Debt Service: This item includes the repayment of interest and principal to the City Capital Reserve Fund for the acquisition of street lights and installation of LED street lighting within the District. Transfer Out - General City Street Lights Fund: This item includes the cost for the replacement and installation of District owned street lights. These costs are incurred in the General City Street Lights Fund and reimbursed by the District. Other Revenues: This includes other revenues that are not levied through the annual assessments that support the District operations. These other revenues may include: interest earnings and Developer Energizing Fees. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#12 Page 503 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Overview Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the public lighting facilities, including traffic signals. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 commencing with Section 5000) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]. Section 22547 of the 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement". Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights -of -ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#12 Page 504 Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, safety, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and • providing for safe vehicular and pedestrian access for properties within the District, and • providing beautification and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the safety and visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District However, it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#12 Page 505 property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined; however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since Fiscal Year 1996/97. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit ("EBU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU). Every other land -use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land -use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land - use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land -Use Eauivalent Benefit Units Property Type (County Use Code) EBU Value Multiplier Single Family Residential 1.00 Parcel Multi -Family Residential 1.00 Unit Non -Residential 2.00 Acre The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2018/19 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#12 Page 506 Maximum Allowable Actual Assessment Asessment Total Property Type (County Use Code) Rate per EBU Rate per EBU Units/Acres Total EBUs Single Family Residential $17.77 $17.77 27,875.00 27,875.00 Multi -Family Residential 17.77 17.77 11,621.00 11,621.00 Non -Residential 17.77 17.77 3,217.56 6,435.12 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#12 Page 506 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the street lights and traffic signals is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#12 Page 507 g3 gY'a R$3a3ilq' ?�3q=3a�9�7 a Y3 33333 W p� u! 9�'36ss9gY°�0 ,4sa4=>ilv C_ co a 6 O W =r ip�Y Y$SM Ys 99�v.6;�Sny Qa �Y ui Grove Av Z7 W CD CO 3si�i�9sa�� Carnelian St Vineyard Av 44rn Hellman Av Hellman Av Archibald Av Archibald Av Hermosa Av _ Hermosa Av Haven Av Haven Av Milliken Av Milliken Av Rochester Av Rochester Av Day Cree B folk Etiwanda Av Etiwanda Av �• L East Av D m o o � W v �. oo r 5' N O O ` (C Q Cherry Av o (n 0 C. r 0 r + < y. 3 N `. cn U) v Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#12 Page 508 ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2018/19 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following table summarize the Fiscal Year 2018/19 actual assessments for the District: Property Type (County Use Code) Actual Assessment Rate per EBU Total Units/Acres Total EBUs Total Assessment Single Family Residential $17.77 27,875.00 27,875.00 $495,338.75 Multi -Family Residential 17.77 11,621.00 11,621.00 206,505.17 Non -Residential 1 17.77 3,217.56 6,435.12 114,352.13 Totals 1 42,713.56 45,931.12 $816,196.05 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations The following annexations are effective for Fiscal Year 2018/19: Apn Annexation Date Project Name Total Units/ Acres Total EBUs Property Type 0210-081-13 02/01/17 PM 19474 2.97 5.94 MIND 0208-131-85 & 86 02/01/17 PM 17663 2.00 2.00 SFD 1089-031-37 02/15/17 PM 19637 10.04 20.08 Commercial 1077-601-13 & 14 05/03/17 DRC2016-00006 4.58 9.16 MIND 1087-261-12 08/02/17 PM 17663 12.00 12.00 SFD 0201-182-36 to 38 08/02/17 TR 18391 6.00 6.00 SFD 0229-141-06 & 07 08/16/17 DRC2016-00270 3.66 3.66 MIND 0208-031-58 & 59 09/06/17 DRC2014-00545 60.00 30.00 MULTI 0209-211-41 10/04/17 DRC2016-00522 4.77 1 4.77 MIND 0225-122-83 10/18/17 DRC2015-00821 1.00 1.00 SFD 0209-032-28 & 29 12/06/17 DRC2016-00695 7.51 7.51 MIND Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#12 Page 509 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2018/19 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 (Local Streets) Page 510 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 (LOCAL STREETS) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2700 Fax: 909.477.2849 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Lynne B. Kennedy, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Sam Spagnolo, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director Page 511 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER 1 INTRODUCTION 3 Reason for Assessment 3 Process for Annual Assessment 3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 4 Description of the Boundaries of the District 4 Description of Improvements and Services 4 Map of Improvements 5 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 7 District Budget 7 Definitions of Budget Items 9 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 10 Overview 10 Special Benefit 11 General Benefit 11 Method of Assessment Spread 11 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM 13 ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS 15 Assessment Roll 15 Annexations 15 Page 512 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July 18, 2018, the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 18-056, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (Local Streets) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed the City Engineer to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2018/19 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay for the acquisition of street lights, the installation of Light Emitting Diode (LED) street lighting, and estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. Fiscal Year 2018/19 Budget Expenditures Operations and Maintenance 261,590 Debt Service 256,020 Transfer Out 46,870 Total Expenditures Budget 564,480 Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies 371,030 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 4,030 Subtotal - Taxes 375,060 Other Revenues 1,000 Transfer In 188,420 Total Revenues Budget 564,480 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ - Total District EBU Count 9,376.32 Actual Assessment per EBU $ 39.97 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU $ 39.97 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#13 Page 513 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. 2. 1 have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirely of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, I certify that the Annual Engineer's Report and Assessment Diagram included herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#13 Page 514 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements, the installation of LED street lighting, and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the District for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the District by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the District. • Refers to the Engineer's Report, on file with the City Clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the City Clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#13 Page 515 During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including the improvements, to the zones within the District, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to, the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as the entire City west of Haven Ave. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of street lights, traffic signals and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The maintenance and servicing includes, but is not limited to, furnishing electric current for public lighting facilities including street lights and traffic signals, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in operational and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, in order to lower expenses of the District. In Fiscal Year 2017/18, the acquisition by the City of the street lights and installation of LED street lighting specially benefiting the properties within the District has been added to the improvements. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#13 Page 516 Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of street light and traffic signal improvements to be maintained using District funds. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#13 Page 517 �'}YQQiI 11 fill 11 o u � ca�fig7���y 1141 ,��?•i}}ii7p�9a} ���rr335¢4�yr- 1 q., Grove A v ' 4�=Yea `��gi Q3�34 Vineyard Av m � W i Zr / Hellman Av i Archibald Av Hermosa Av Haven Av l I I Milliken AvI}I; r� i I � Rochester Av 1__ EtivandaAv v», East Av N Y 7 G _ 8 g W , z � r in / w� i• OF • Will N• • • •• � I Carnelian St dm • • • ••• *� Holman Ave •••/ S} • age }+•7=0 W r , f••�Midi C3, Archibald Av i1 • ,*%ftNNN•I,, i i Hermosa Av ' ti Haven Av r i Milliken Av Z i 1 � 1 �— I 712✓jtf:. 1 rw ............. V! Day Creek BI 1 � 1 d Etiwanda Av 1 �/ d 1 East Av G p o A 77 1 ra i _rw,_, CMrdy Av . Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#13 Page 518 11 ti_,i r r LJ • CD CD o m Q r N � 0 _ N (p to N N Y 7 G _ 8 g W , z � r in / w� i• OF • Will N• • • •• � I Carnelian St dm • • • ••• *� Holman Ave •••/ S} • age }+•7=0 W r , f••�Midi C3, Archibald Av i1 • ,*%ftNNN•I,, i i Hermosa Av ' ti Haven Av r i Milliken Av Z i 1 � 1 �— I 712✓jtf:. 1 rw ............. V! Day Creek BI 1 � 1 d Etiwanda Av 1 �/ d 1 East Av G p o A 77 1 ra i _rw,_, CMrdy Av . Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#13 Page 518 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the District levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Expenditures Operations and Maintenance: Contract Services/General Utilities: Electric Utilities Assessment Administration Adm in./General Overhead Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance Debt Services: Interest Expense Principal Repayments Subtotal - Debt Service Transfer Out - General Street Lights Fund Total Expenditures Budget Fiscal Year 2018/19 Budqet $ 20,980 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2018/19 204,000 34,070 2,540 261,590 40,240 215,780 256,020 W i 7 ATTACHMENT#13 Page 519 Fiscal Year 2018/19 Budget Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies $ 371,030 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 4,030 Subtotal - Taxes 375,060 Other Revenues: Developer Energizing Fee 1,000 Transfer In Transfer In - General Fund 188,420 Total Revenues Budget $ 564,480 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ - Total Gross Estimated Assessments $ 374,771.50 Total District EBU Count 9,376.32 Actual Assessment per EBU - Fiscal Year 2018/19 $ 39.97 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU - Fiscal Year 2018/19 $ 39.97 The maximum allowable assessment per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in Fiscal Year 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the total amount of funds needed to maintain the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however, it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2018 Contribution to Reserve - Fiscal Year 2018/19 Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2019 Operating Reserve $ 674,165 $ 674,165 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#13 Page 520 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time and part-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Additionally, this includes benefits available to City employees. Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District. Utilities: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity and telephone services, as required, for the operation and maintenance of the street lights, traffic signals, and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual Engineer's Report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all central services departments of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational District within the City's administrative structure. Capital Outlay: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include installation of safety lights and other large improvements. Debt Service: This item includes the repayment of interest and principal to the City Capital Reserve Fund for the acquisition of street lights and installation of LED street lighting within the District. Transfer Out - General City Street Lights Fund: This item includes the cost for the replacement and installation of District owned street lights. These costs are incurred in the General City Street Lights Fund and reimbursed by the District. Other Revenues: This includes other revenues that are not levied through the annual assessments that support the District operations. These other revenues may include: interest earnings and Developer Energizing Fees. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#13 Page 521 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Overview Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the public lighting facilities, including traffic signals. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 commencing with Section 5000) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]. Section 22547 of the 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement". Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights -of -ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#13 Page 522 Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, safety, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and • providing for safe vehicular and pedestrian access for properties within the District, and • providing beautification and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the safety and visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District However, it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the District that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#13 Page 523 property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined; however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since Fiscal Year 1996/97. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The EBU method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one EBU. Every other land -use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land -use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land -use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land -Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Property Type (County Use Code) EBU Value Multiplier Single Family Residential 1.00 Parcel Multi -Family Residential 1.00 Unit Non -Residential 2.00 Acre The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2018/19 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#13 Page 524 Maximum Allowable Actual Assessment Asessment Total Property Type (County Use Code) Rate per EBU Rate per EBU Units/Acres Total EBUs Single Family Residential $39.97 $39.97 7,257.00 7,257.00 Multi -Family Residential 39.97 39.97 2,049.00 2,049.00 Non -Residential 39.97 39.97 70.32 70.32 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#13 Page 524 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the street lights and traffic signals is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#13 Page 525 �. a�?•�aeos 3T g1!� Vag 9a3gzQs9ii� W ;3��a9:Ii�Q�s4 '� Q (D a €asaa a D -nW 7 .X n o s2'2�L�aS}gs = r i3ase9a ° 3 Y�aasa in Grove Av :Zl W � (D cn g I � a 's�9 al4se �� I Carnelian St Vineyard Av rn .�. S Hellman Av S � Hellman Av Archibald Av Archibald Av Hermosa Av j Hermosa Av Haven Av Haven Av Milliken Av _.._.._.._.._.J Milliken Av Rochester Av Rochester Av 6.............—..�..rs Day Creek BI H. i Etiwanda Av Etiwanda Av i S S2 East Av i D o 0 W I . : a U �. W r CID N CJl CD ; .. `:� tQ Cherry Av ' 0 CID C-) N G. 0 r n� r- n Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#13 Page 526 ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2018/19 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2018/19 actual assessments for the District: Property Type (County Use Code) Actual Assessment Rate per EBU Total Units/Acres Total EBUs Total Assessment Single Family Residential $39.97 7,257.00 7,257.00 $ 290,062.29 Multi -Family Residential 39.971 2,049.001 2,049.001 $ 81,898.53 Non -Residential 39.97 35.16 70.32 $ 2,810.68 Totals 60.00 1 9,341.16 9,376.32 $ 374,771.50 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations The following annexations are effective for Fiscal Year 2018/19: Apn Annexation Date Project Name Total Units/ Acres Total EBUs Property Type 0208-131-85 & 86 02/01/17 PM 17663 2.00 2.00 SFD 0201-182-36 to 38 08/02/17 TR 18391 6.00 6.00 SFD 0208-031-58 & 59 09/06/17 DRC2014-00545 60.00 30.00 MULTI Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#13 Page 527 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2018/19 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 (Victoria Planned Community) Page 528 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 (VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2700 Fax: 909.477.2849 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Lynne B. Kennedy, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Sam Spagnolo, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director Page 529 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER 1 INTRODUCTION 3 Reason for Assessment 3 Process for Annual Assessment 3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 4 Description of the Boundaries of the District 4 Description of Improvements and Services 4 Map of Improvements 5 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 7 District Budget 7 Definitions of Budget Items 9 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 10 Overview 10 Special Benefit 11 General Benefit 11 Method of Assessment Spread 11 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM 13 ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS 15 Assessment Roll 15 Annexations 15 Page 530 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July 18, 2018, the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 18-056, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Street Light Maintenance District No. 3 (Victoria Planned Community) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed the City Engineer to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2018/19 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay for the acquisition of street lights, the installation of Light Emitting Diode (LED) street lighting, and estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. Fiscal Year 2018/19 Budget Expenditures Personnel Services $ 28,020 Operations and Maintenance 145,790 Debt Service 95,930 Transfer Out 18,580 Total Expenditures Budget 288,320 Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies 352,870 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 3,860 Subtotal - Taxes 356,730 Other Revenues 18,640 Total Revenues Budget 375,370 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ 87,050 Total District EBU Count 7,559.50 Actual Assessment per EBU $ 47.15 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU $ 47.15 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#14 Page 531 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. 2. 1 have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, I certify that the Annual Engineer's Report and Assessment Diagram included herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#14 Page 532 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements, the installation of LED street lighting, and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the District for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the District by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the District. • Refers to the Engineer's Report, on file with the City Clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the City Clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#14 Page 533 During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including the improvements, to the zones within the District, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to, the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area located south of the 210 Freeway, west of Etiwanda Ave, southwest of the 1-15 Freeway and east of Haven Ave, also known as the Victoria Neighborhood Planned Community, and are more particularly in the diagram of the District included herein. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of street lights, traffic signals and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The maintenance and servicing includes, but is not limited to, furnishing electric current for public lighting facilities including street lights and traffic signals, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in operational and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, in order to lower expenses of the District. In Fiscal Year 2017/18, the acquisition by the City of the street lights and installation of LED street lighting specially benefiting the properties within the District has been added to the improvements. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#14 Page 534 Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of street light and traffic signal improvements to be maintained using District funds. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#14 Page 535 i 'll"'!i HavenAv [� 9 a CL '�g x 4�3}%743 I• .. i�IJ.• •i •.•• •1.•:� S •1 j Milliken Av I�`'•i'• �'` •'_ �`_•� '•� r..= •.� I.•w• i t... • . tot. t. • • I M 41 deIn •... j f..•. .t. . JJ 0.0 . �.•. .• ...• .h . • .. I r. f.�•.y j♦� � 11•» f Nim •.•••• . '•ti . • • .961 •..•. �I. o • M.• RochesterAv •� •••••'� ;j••�•••! •..•>f •. ! ZSR ' � I .r. eg �� it t : . •' . •iorF. ;• •� • • 00 go 249 61, zo i f~ s r : i:sw r �� •• . • i •••• •.N ••� .i i..►. ••..ego • • Etiwanda Av `\ .•• . . .• • . ; • . i � -a CD n cn U) o M Q --------------------------------- cD m Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#14 Page 536 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the District levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#14 Page 537 Fiscal Year 2018/19 Budget Expenditures Personnel Services: Regular Salaries $ 19,060 Fringe Benefits 8,960 Subtotal - Personnel 28,020 Operations and Maintenance: Operations and Maintenance: Training 180 Membership Dues 50 O & M/General 9,940 Contract Services 8,050 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 18,220 Utilities: Electric Utilities 90,000 Assessment Administration 30,640 Adm in./General Overhead 6,930 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 145,790 Debt Service: Interest Expense 15,080 Principal Repayments 80,850 Subtotal - Debt Service 95,930 Transfer Out - General Street Lights Fund 18,580 Total Expenditures Budget $ 288,320 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#14 Page 537 Fiscal Year 2018/19 Budget Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies $ 352,870 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 3,860 Subtotal - Taxes 356,730 Other Revenues: Interest Earnings 18,640 Total Revenues Budget $ 375,370 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ 87,050 Total Gross Estimated Assessments $ 356,430.41 Total District EBU Count 7,559.50 Actual Assessment per EBU - Fiscal Year 2018/19 $ 47.15 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU - Fiscal Year 2018/19 $ 47.15 The maximum allowable assessment per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in Fiscal Year 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the total amount of funds needed to maintain the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however, it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Operating Reserve Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2018 $ 1,373,279 Contribution to Reserve - Fiscal Year 2018/19 87,050 Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2019 $ 1,460,329 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#14 Page 538 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time and part-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Additionally, this includes benefits available to City employees. Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District. Utilities: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity and telephone services, as required, for the operation and maintenance of the street lights, traffic signals, and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual Engineer's Report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all central services departments of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational District within the City's administrative structure. Capital Outlay: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include installation of safety lights and other large improvements. Debt Service: This item includes the repayment of interest and principal to the City General Fund for the acquisition of street lights and installation of LED street lighting within the District. Transfer Out - General City Street Lights Fund: This item includes the cost for the replacement and installation of District owned street lights. These costs are incurred in the General City Street Lights Fund and reimbursed by the District. Other Revenues: This includes other revenues that are not levied through the annual assessments that support the District operations. These other revenues may include: interest earnings and Developer Energizing Fees. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#14 Page 539 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Overview Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the public lighting facilities, including traffic signals. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 commencing with Section 5000) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]. Section 22547 of the 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement". Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights -of -ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#14 Page 540 Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, safety, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and • providing for safe vehicular and pedestrian access for properties within the District, and • providing beautification and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the safety and visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District However, it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#14 Page 541 property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined; however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since Fiscal Year 1996/97. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The EBU method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EBU). Every other land -use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land -use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land - use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land -Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Property Type (County Use Code) EBU Value Multiplier Single Family Residential 1.00 Parcel Multi -Family Residential 1.00 Unit Non -Residential 2.00 Acre The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2018/19 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#14 Page 542 Maximum Allowable Actual Assessment Asessment Rate Total Property Type (County Use Code) Rate per EBU per EBU Units/Acres Total EBUs Single Family Residential $47.15 $47.15 6,463.00 6,463.00 Multi -Family Residential 47.15 47.15 589.00 589.00 Non -Residential 47.15 47.15 253.75 507.50 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#14 Page 542 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the street lights and traffic signals is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#14 Page 543 �r 1 alai ar �p3 Ills 9a�dey A.as9sa§�� D o W L O ? Grove Av m G Vineyard Av w � Hellman Avg.. Archibald Av ! 1 Hermosa Av 1 Haven Av! Milliken Av Rochester Av Etiwanda Av A 90, East Av O cn O .� r •� O • r Q 0 w r N Cn � lD D o 0 o W CD oo r C1 Q Cherry Av CO y Q c� 1 Carnelian St Hellman Av i Archibald Av ! j Hermosa Av 1 1 Haven Av 1 1 1 1 ........... Milliken Av i .J W Rochester Av .BI Day Creek B� �. 1 Etiwanda Av i 1 � Il «� 1 (D 1 .........t 1 CD 1 0 1 D W Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#14 Page 544 ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2018/19 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2018/19 actual assessments for the District: Property Type (County Use Code) Actual Assessment Rate per EBU Total Units/Acres Total EBUs Total Assessment Single Family Residential $47.15 6,463.00 6,463.00 $304,730.45 Multi -Family Residential 47.15 589.00 589.00 $27,771.35 Non -Residential 1 47.15 253.75 507.50 $23,928.61 Totals 1 7,305.75 7,559.50 $356,430.41 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations The following annexation is effective for Fiscal Year 2018/19: Annexation Total Units/ Apn Date Project Name Acres Total EBUs Property Type 1089-031-37 02/15/17 PM 19637 10.04 20.08 Commercial Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#14 Page 545 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2018/19 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community) Page 546 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 (TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2700 Fax: 909.477.2849 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Lynne B. Kennedy, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Sam Spagnolo, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director Page 547 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER 1 INTRODUCTION 3 Reason for Assessment 3 Process for Annual Assessment 3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 4 Description of the Boundaries of the District 4 Description of Improvements and Services 4 Map of Improvements 5 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 7 District Budget 7 Definitions of Budget Items 9 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 10 Overview 10 Special Benefit 11 General Benefit 11 Method of Assessment Spread 11 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM 13 ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS 15 Assessment Roll 15 Annexations 15 Page 548 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July 18, 2018, the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 18-056, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Street Light Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed the City Engineer to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2018/19 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay for the acquisition of street lights, the installation of Light Emitting Diode (LED) street lighting, and estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance Total District EBU Count Actual Assessment per EBU Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU $ (106,430) 5,660.66 $ 28.96 $ 28.96 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHEMNT#15 Page 549 Fiscal Year 2018/19 Budget Expenditures Personnel Services $ 28,020 Operations and Maintenance 72,620 Capital Expenditures 120,000 Debt Service 48,330 Transfer Out 8,620 Total Expenditures Budget 277,590 Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies 162,300 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 1,760 Subtotal - Taxes 164,060 Other Revenues 7,100 Total Revenues Budget 171,160 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance Total District EBU Count Actual Assessment per EBU Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU $ (106,430) 5,660.66 $ 28.96 $ 28.96 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHEMNT#15 Page 549 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. 2. 1 have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, I certify that the Annual Engineer's Report and Assessment Diagram included herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHEMNT#15 Page 550 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements, the installation of LED street lighting, and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the District for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the District by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the District. • Refers to the Engineer's Report, on file with the City Clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the City Clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHEMNT#15 Page 551 During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including the improvements, to the zones within the District, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to, the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area of the City known as the Terra Vista Planned Community, which is located north of Foothill Blvd, west of Rochester Ave, east of Haven Ave, south of Base Line Rd and includes the northeast corner of Base Line Rd and Haven Ave. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of street lights, traffic signals and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The maintenance and servicing includes, but is not limited to, furnishing electric current for public lighting facilities including street lights and traffic signals, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in operational and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, in order to lower expenses of the District. In Fiscal Year 2017/18, the acquisition by the City of the street lights and installation of LED street lighting specially benefiting the properties within the District has been added to the improvements. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHEMNT#15 Page 552 Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of street light and traffic signal improvements to be maintained using District funds. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHEMNT#15 Page 553 n M cD CD G O w W 0 000 0 ,• •• • •• 0000 • % % % ':• •� ••• •• ••0 s• • 60 06 Oo Rochester Av -0 ` z Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHEMNT#15 Page 554 • Haven Av • Sr '. i • . • • • i r f •••• • • ••: • •'• • 0 0 f 0 • f • • • • • • �• •• ••• • ''• • 00 00 • 00 0 00 '� 00 ♦ • • !ti •• . • . • . •• • .. • is '• •• • • • ''•' • • • • • ��\ 00 • ` 00 "s •. 0000 • 0 • i • s i • '' .• ''': •• •• • 41 004,60 • or. • • ••'• 0 • • •• • r • • ••' So • • •• .0. 0''0 N A • •• • . Goo so 0 • • • • • • • • 0 • • •CL • '• ••'•• • •: N• ••• V : • . • . •. • • •• s ss 0 0 •. . 0'000• ••• •••• • � 00.0.•: • . . • . • '•00 :• •': • • I Milliken Av 0 000 0 ,• •• • •• 0000 • % % % ':• •� ••• •• ••0 s• • 60 06 Oo Rochester Av -0 ` z Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHEMNT#15 Page 554 • Sr �'•r • • '•• • i • . • • • •� •'. •• ' • 1 • , '' s • • = ••' • •,% • 0 • 0 000 0 ,• •• • •• 0000 • % % % ':• •� ••• •• ••0 s• • 60 06 Oo Rochester Av -0 ` z Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHEMNT#15 Page 554 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the District levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHEMNT#15 Page 555 Fiscal Year 2018/19 Budget Expenditures Personnel Services: Regular Salaries $ 19,060 Fringe Benefits 8,960 Subtotal - Personnel 28,020 Operations and Maintenance: Operations and Maintenance: Training 190 Membership Dues 50 O & M/General 4,940 Equipment Operations and Maintenance 1,000 Contract Services 3,730 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 9,910 Utilities: Electric Utilities 39,000 Assessment Administration 18,750 Admin./General Overhead 4,960 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 72,620 Capital Expenditures: Capital Project 120,000 Debt Service: Interest Expense 7,600 Principal Repayments 40,730 Subtotal - Debt Service 48,330 Transfer Out - General City Street Lights Fund 8,620 Total Expenditures Budget $ 277,590 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHEMNT#15 Page 555 Fiscal Year 2018/19 Budget Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies $ 162,300 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 1,760 Subtotal - Taxes 164,060 Other Revenues: Interest Earnings 7,100 Total Revenues Budget $ 171,160 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ (106,430) Total Gross Estimated Assessments $ 163,932.71 Total District EBU Count 5,660.66 Actual Assessment per EBU - Fiscal Year 2018/19 $ 28.96 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU - Fiscal Year 2018/19 $ 28.96 The maximum allowable assessment per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in Fiscal Year 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the total amount of funds needed to maintain the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however, it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Operating Reserve Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2018 $ 618,887 Contribution to Reserve - Fiscal Year 2018/19 (106,430) Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2019 $ 512,457 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHEMNT#15 Page 556 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time and part-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Additionally, this includes benefits available to City employees. Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District. Utilities: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity and telephone services, as required, for the operation and maintenance of the street lights, traffic signals, and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual Engineer's Report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all central services departments of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational District within the City's administrative structure. Capital Outlay: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include installation of safety lights and other large improvements. Debt Service: This item includes the repayment of interest and principal to the City Capital Reserve Fund for the acquisition of street lights and installation of LED street lighting within the District. Transfer Out - General City Street Lights Fund: This item includes the cost for the replacement and installation of District owned street lights. These costs are incurred in the General City Street Lights Fund and reimbursed by the District. Other Revenues: This includes other revenues that are not levied through the annual assessments that support the District operations. These other revenues may include: interest earnings and Developer Energizing Fees. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHEMNT#15 Page 557 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Overview Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the public lighting facilities, including traffic signals. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 commencing with Section 5000) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]. Section 22547 of the 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement". Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights -of -ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHEMNT#15 Page 558 Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, safety, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and • providing for safe vehicular and pedestrian access for properties within the District, and • providing beautification and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the safety and visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District However, it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHEMNT#15 Page 559 property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined; however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since Fiscal Year 1996/97. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The EBU method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EBU). Every other land -use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land -use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land - use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land -Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Property Type (County Use Code) EBU Value Multiplier Single Family Residential 1.00 Parcel Multi -Family Residential 0.50 Unit Non -Residential 2.00 Acre The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2018/19 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHEMNT#15 Page 560 Maximum Allowable Actual Assessment Asessment Rate Total Property Type (County Use Code) Rate per EBU per EBU Units/Acres Total EBUs Single Family Residential $28.96 $28.96 2,652.00 2,652.00 Multi -Family Residential 28.96 28.96 5,036.00 2,518.00 Non -Residential 28.96 28.96 245.33 490.66 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHEMNT#15 Page 560 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the street lights and traffic signals is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHEMNT#15 Page 561 11, ,2, igo g� O W illy �;r�RY�4 8'aR in �1 W CD Ui gQgls Grove Av'_.._..---•—••; �a4B�3g3a��&6�ppa � � s Vineyard AV j A 0) 1� 5 Cn Hellman AV Archibald AV 1 p 1 Hermosa AV: i Haven AV! Milliken AV i Rochester AV I Etiwanda AV 11 �2 East AV �_._.._.._.._...-- D o�l O co � ? N — fD o r. W r N CT N � o � .� a r a Cherry AV o(D a o� A r 3 N U � CD F W U) a CD W a Rochester AV '*Day Creek Etiwanda AV 0 D Carnelian St I Hellman AV Archibald AV Hermosa AV Haven AV Milliken AV tE7 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHEMNT#15 Page 562 ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2018/19 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2018/19 actual assessments for the District: Property Type (County Use Code) Actual Assessment Rate per EBU Total Units/Acres Total EBUs Total Assessment Single Family Residential $28.96 2,652.00 2,652.00 $76,801.92 Multi -Family Residential 28.96 5,036.00 2,518.00 72,921.28 Non -Residential 28.96 245.33 490.66 14,209.51 Totals 7,933.33 5,660.66 $163,932.71 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations There were no effective annexations for Fiscal Year 2018/19. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHEMNT#15 Page 563 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2018/19 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 (Caryn Planned Community) Page 564 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 5 (CARYN PLANNED COMMUNITY) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2700 Fax: 909.477.2849 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Lynne B. Kennedy, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Sam Spagnolo, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director Page 565 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER 1 INTRODUCTION 3 Reason for Assessment 3 Process for Annual Assessment 3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 4 Description of the Boundaries of the District 4 Description of Improvements and Services 4 Map of Improvements 5 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 7 District Budget 7 Definitions of Budget Items 9 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 10 Overview 10 Special Benefit 11 General Benefit 11 Method of Assessment Spread 11 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM 13 ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS 15 Assessment Roll 15 Annexations 15 Page 566 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July 18, 2018, the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 18-056, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Street Light Maintenance District No. 5 (Caryn Planned Community) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed the City Engineer to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2018/19 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay for the acquisition of street lights, the installation of Light Emitting Diode (LED) street lighting, and estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. Fiscal Year 2018/19 Budget Expenditures Personnel Services $ 6,530 Operations and Maintenance 37,500 Debt Service 21,680 Transfer Out 4,090 Total Expenditures Budget 69,800 Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies 43,710 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 510 Total Revenues Budget 44,220 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ (25,580) Total District EBU Count 1,276.00 Actual Assessment per EBU $ 34.60 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU $ 34.60 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#16 Page 567 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. 2. 1 have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefitted Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, I certify that the Annual Engineer's Report, and Assessment Diagram included herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#16 Page 568 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements, the installation of LED street lighting, and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the District for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the District by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the District. • Refers to the Engineer's Report, on file with the City Clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the City Clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#16 Page 569 During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including the improvements, to the zones within the District, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to, the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area located north of the 210 Freeway, south of Banyan St, west of Rochester Ave and east of Milliken Ave, also known as the Caryn Planned Community. The boundaries also include Tract No. 13835 east of Rochester Ave and Tracts No. 13748, 13857 and 13858 west of Milliken Ave. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of street lights, traffic signals and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The maintenance and servicing includes, but is not limited to, furnishing electric current for public lighting facilities including street lights and traffic signals, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in operational and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, in order to lower expenses of the District. In Fiscal Year 2017/18, the acquisition by the City of the street lights and installation of LED street lighting specially benefiting the properties within the District has been added to the improvements. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#16 Page 570 Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of street light and traffic signal improvements to be maintained using District funds. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#16 Page 571 9�� a e=ss9 �e111� •� d' r =obi_ Q d �=fir RochesterAv 11H i i cD C4 L -a i CD o M v� m co (p ca' • • . . . . N • • 0 00 . , • . •. • . . 00 0 Z Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#16 Page 572 i i i W i (p i • • . . . . , - i r • • • •• • . . • • . . • • . � • i rr i . . • • • 0 0 .000.• .. • • 0 -' , .................. • • • • . . , ,. , •. . , • O , • • . • , . 0. . g • . . . . • • • • . • •. . • . • , . . . Z Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#16 Page 572 i i i W i (p i (D � i r N i � i rr i -' .................. O (31 Q) r 0 Z Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#16 Page 572 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the District levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#16 Page 573 Fiscal Year 2018/19 Budget Expenditures Personnel Services: Regular Salaries $ 4,440 Fringe Benefits 2,090 Subtotal - Personnel 6,530 Operations and Maintenance: Operations and Maintenance: Training 180 Membership Dues 50 Contract Services 1,770 O & M/General 8,990 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 10,990 Utilities: Electric Utilities 19,000 Assessment Administration 5,970 Admin./General Overhead 1,540 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 37,500 Debt Service: Interest Expense 3,410 Principal Repayments 18,270 Subtotal - Debt Service 21,680 Transfer Out - General Street Lights Fund 4,090 Total Expenditures Budget $ 69,800 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#16 Page 573 Fiscal Year 2017/18 Budget Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies $ 43,710 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 510 Subtotal - Taxes 44,220 Total Revenues Budget $ 44,220 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ (25,580) Total Gross Estimated Assessments $ 44,149.60 Total District EBU Count 1,276.00 Actual Assessment per EBU - Fiscal Year 2018/19 $ 34.60 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU - Fiscal Year 2018/19 $ 34.60 The maximum allowable assessment per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in Fiscal Year 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the total amount of funds needed to maintain the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however, it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2018 Contribution to Reserve - Fiscal Year 2018/19 Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2019 Operating Reserve $ (104,291) (25,580) $ (129,871) Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#16 Page 574 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time and part-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Additionally, this includes benefits available to City employees. Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District. Utilities: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity and telephone services, as required, for the operation and maintenance of the street lights, traffic signals, and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual Engineer's Report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all central services departments of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational District within the City's administrative structure. Capital Outlay: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include installation of safety lights and other large improvements. Debt Service: This item includes the repayment of interest and principal to the City Capital Reserve Fund for the acquisition of street lights and installation of LED street lighting within the District. Transfer Out - General City Street Lights Fund: This item includes the cost for the replacement and installation of District owned street lights. These costs are incurred in the General City Street Lights Fund and reimbursed by the District. Other Revenues: This includes other revenues that are not levied through the annual assessments that support the District operations. These other revenues may include: interest earnings and Developer Energizing Fees. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#16 Page 575 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Overview Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the public lighting facilities, including traffic signals. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 commencing with Section 5000) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]. Section 22547 of the 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement". Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights -of -ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#16 Page 576 Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, safety, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and • providing for safe vehicular and pedestrian access for properties within the District, and • providing beautification and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the safety and visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District However, it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#16 Page 577 Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined, however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since Fiscal Year 1996/97. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The EBU method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one EBU. The following table provides the weighting factors applied by land -use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land -Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Property Type (County Use Code) EBU Value Multiplier Single Family Residential 1.00 Parcel The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2018/19 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Maximum Allowable Actual Assessment Asessment Rate Total Property Type (County Use Code) Rate per EBU per EBU Units/Acres Total EBUs Single Family Residential $34.60 $34.60 1,276.00 1,276.00 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the street lights and traffic signals is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#16 Page 578 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#16 Page 579 $S 3 ?gl�gsa`sis'a 3 AIiQ¢�a�il� 433�6g;9gaA; D o a E 98a __0 E CO O Er 3a1: Yea ash 3.y�Ai'!• i�9g��da�4t�9 Y Grove Av .affli�g3 �le �� �Ai�.asgea Vineyard Av rn A ? S W Hellman Avg Archibald Av 1 i Hermosa Av i Haven Av! Milliken Av Rochester Av Etiwanda Av ! �2 East Av W N. CL CD Rochester Av ..Day Creek Etiwanda Av �y Carnelian St I Hellman Av Archibald Av Hermosa Av Haven Av Milliken Av Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#16 Page 580 o O aWi o _ cD N (D CT � o .� r a `:1 a Cherry Av Cn 0 a Cn r N Rochester Av ..Day Creek Etiwanda Av �y Carnelian St I Hellman Av Archibald Av Hermosa Av Haven Av Milliken Av Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#16 Page 580 ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2018/19 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2018/19 actual assessment for the District: A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations There were no effective annexations for Fiscal Year 2018/19. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#16 Page 581 Actual Assessment Total Property Type (County Use Code) Rate per EBU Units/Acres Total EBUs Total Assessment Single Family Residential $34.60 1,276.00 1,276.00 $44,149.60 Totals 1,276.00 1,276.00 $44,149.60 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations There were no effective annexations for Fiscal Year 2018/19. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#16 Page 581 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2018/19 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial Industrial) Page 582 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 (COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2700 Fax: 909.477.2849 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Lynne B. Kennedy, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Sam Spagnolo, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director Page 583 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER 1 INTRODUCTION 3 Reason for Assessment 3 Process for Annual Assessment 3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 4 Description of the Boundaries of the District 4 Description of Improvements and Services 4 Map of Improvements 5 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 7 District Budget 7 Definitions of Budget Items 9 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 10 Overview 10 Special Benefit 11 General Benefit 11 Method of Assessment Spread 11 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM 13 ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS 15 Assessment Roll 15 Annexations 15 Page 584 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July 18, 2018, the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 18-056, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial Industrial) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed the City Engineer to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2018/19 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay for the acquisition of street lights, the installation of Light Emitting Diode (LED) street lighting, and estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. Fiscal Year 2018/19 Budget Expenditures Personnel Services $ 28,020 Operations and Maintenance 53,690 Debt Service 35,210 Transfer Out 6,410 Total Expenditures Budget 123,330 Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies 134,590 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 880 Subtotal - Taxes 135,470 Other Revenues 6,350 Total Revenues Budget 141,820 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ 18,490 Total District EBU Count 2,644.83 Actual Assessment per EBU $ 51.40 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU $ 51.40 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#17 Page 585 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. 2. 1 have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, I certify that the Annual Engineer's Report and Assessment Diagram included herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#17 Page 586 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements, the installation of LED street lighting, and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the District for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the District by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the District. • Refers to the Engineer's Report, on file with the City Clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the City Clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#17 Page 587 During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including the improvements, to the zones within the District, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to, express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as the commercial and industrial area of the City which is generally bounded by Foothill Blvd on the north, 4th St on the south, East Ave on the east and Grove Ave on the west. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of street lights, traffic signals and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The maintenance and servicing includes, but is not limited to, furnishing electric current for public lighting facilities including street lights and traffic signals, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in operational and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, in order to lower expenses of the District. In Fiscal Year 2017/18, the acquisition by the City of the street lights and installation of LED street lighting specially benefiting the properties within the District has been added to the improvements. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#17 Page 588 Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of street light and traffic signal improvements to be maintained using District funds. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#17 Page 589 7ca� e�Hit, 1131111 P4 7� l I-Ii Nnngoy rd Av $ g S@ r Hellman Av w Archibald Av + � 8 A m Gro ve A vI—i— ----- � i �l \ V IHerweAv Haven Av • ; ~ M Milliken A LI •r Rochester Av �ISO I Etivanda Av • • N i =aaaa I East Av 1.,....... D o 3 r 0 O 1. C L CMrry Av Carnolian $t Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#17 Page 590 Hellman Ave ''^^ vJ Al MON Av I I Hernwsa Av yi 1 f I • _ Hawn Av I I I � — —�\ ,/----J hWliken Av 1 � 1 1 I 0 CI) Day C reek 0 1 1 Et hvanda Av t 1 East Av 1 � I I 1 1 l I =+ 1� 110 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#17 Page 590 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the District levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Expenditures Personnel Services: Regular Salaries Fringe Benefits Subtotal - Personnel Operations and Maintenance: Operations and Maintenance: Training Membership Dues O & M/General Equipment Operations and Maintenance Contract Services Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance Utilities: Electric Utilities Assessment Administration Adm in./General Overhead Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance Debt Service: Interest Expense Principal Repayments Subtotal - Debt Service Transfer Out - General Street Lights Fund Total Expenditures Budget Fiscal Year 2018/19 Budqet $ 19,060 8,960 28,020 180 50 6,940 800 2,780 10,750 33,000 5,020 4,920 53,690 5,540 29,670 35,210 6,410 $ 123,330 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#17 Page 591 Fiscal Year 2018/19 Budget Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies $ 134,590 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 880 Subtotal - Taxes 135,470 Other Revenues: Interest Earnings 6,350 Total Revenues Budget $ 141,820 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ 18,490 Total Gross Estimated Assessments $ 135,944.22 Total District EBU Count 2,644.83 Actual Assessment per EBU - Fiscal Year 2018/19 $ 51.40 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU - Fiscal Year 2018/19 $ 51.40 The maximum allowable assessment per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in Fiscal Year 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the total amount of funds needed to maintain the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however, it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2018 Contribution to Reserve - Fiscal Year 2018/19 Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2019 Operating Operating Reserve $ 470,427 18,490 $ 488,917 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#17 Page 592 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time and part-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Additionally, this includes benefits available to City employees. Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District. Utilities: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity and telephone services, as required, for the operation and maintenance of the street lights, traffic signals, and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual Engineer's Report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all central services departments of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational District within the City's administrative structure. Capital Outlay: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include installation of safety lights and other large improvements. Debt Service: This item includes the repayment of interest and principal to the City Capital Reserve Fund for the acquisition of street lights and installation of LED street lighting within the District. Transfer Out - General City Street Lights Fund: This item includes the cost for the replacement and installation of District owned street lights. These costs are incurred in the General City Street Lights Fund and reimbursed by the District. Other Revenues: This includes other revenues that are not levied through the annual assessments that support the District operations. These other revenues may include: interest earnings and Developer Energizing Fees. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#17 Page 593 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Overview Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the public lighting facilities, including traffic signals. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 commencing with Section 5000) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]. Section 22547 of the 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement". Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights -of -ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#17 Page 594 Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, safety, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and • providing for safe vehicular and pedestrian access for properties within the District, and • providing beautification and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the safety and visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District However, it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#17 Page 595 property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined, however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since Fiscal Year 1996/97. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The EBU method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one EBU. Every other land -use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land -use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land -use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land -Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Property Type (County Use Code) EBU ValueMultiplier Non -Residential 2.00 Acre The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2018/19 maximum allowable assessment rate for the District: The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the street lights and traffic signals is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#17 Page 596 Maximum Allowable Actual Assessment Asessment Rate Total Property Type (County Use Code) Rate per EBU per EBU Units/Acres Total EBUs Non -Residential $51.40 $51.40 2,644.83 2,644.83 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the street lights and traffic signals is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#17 Page 596 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#17 Page 597 Vineyard Av rn A S S � Hellman Av Archibald Av Hermosa Av Haven Av Milliken Av Rochester Av Etiwanda Av A SO East Av i - - j Rochester Av L............ Day Creek B Etiwanda Av D o 0 o W CD W v N 9���fiii,9g$9QQ; = a m $g�;66sg4 D °ofill W = to a ;8�aj -IIclFe 0'0 O � � CT 00 '; sQ Grove Av (n 3-Bg��iigQ3e�s €a`g1g}�}6tba Zl a 9si9IIN13:11 Vineyard Av rn A S S � Hellman Av Archibald Av Hermosa Av Haven Av Milliken Av Rochester Av Etiwanda Av A SO East Av i - - j Rochester Av L............ Day Creek B Etiwanda Av 0 D Q y€ Carnelian St Hellman Av Archibald Av Hermosa Av Haven Av Milliken Av Sn N. r cQ' Wft z' �1. Oftlik w� v O"k Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#17 Page 598 D o 0 o W CD ;i7 — m N � CT � Cherry Av oz CL rn r N Ut � U) 0 D Q y€ Carnelian St Hellman Av Archibald Av Hermosa Av Haven Av Milliken Av Sn N. r cQ' Wft z' �1. Oftlik w� v O"k Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#17 Page 598 ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2018/19 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2018/19 actual assessment for the District: A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations The following annexations are effective for the 2018/19 Fiscal Year: Apn Actual Project Name Total Units/ Acres Total EBUs Property Type Assessment Total PM19474 2.97 Property Type (County Use Code) Rate per EBU Units/Acres Total EBUs Total Assessment Non -Residential $51.40 2,644.83 2,644.83 $135,944.22 Totals 3.66 2,644.83 2,644.831 $135,944.22 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations The following annexations are effective for the 2018/19 Fiscal Year: Apn Annexation Date Project Name Total Units/ Acres Total EBUs Property Type 0210-081-13 02/01/17 PM19474 2.97 2.97 CO/IND 1077-601-13 & 14 05/03/17 DRC2016-00006 4.58 4.58 CO/IND 0229-141-06 & 07 08/16/17 DRC2016-00270 3.66 3.66 CO/IND 0209-211-41 10/04/17 DRC2016-00522 4.77 4.77 CO/IND 0209-032-28 & 29 12/06/17 DRC2016-00695 7.51 7.51 CO/IND Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#17 Page 599 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2018/19 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) Page 600 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 (NORTH ETIWANDA) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2700 Fax: 909.477.2849 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Lynne B. Kennedy, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Sam Spagnolo, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director Page 601 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER 1 INTRODUCTION 3 Reason for Assessment 3 Process for Annual Assessment 3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 4 Description of the Boundaries of the District 4 Description of Improvements and Services 4 Map of Improvements 5 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 7 District Budget 7 Definitions of Budget Items 9 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 10 Overview 10 Special Benefit 11 General Benefit 11 Method of Assessment Spread 11 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM 13 ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS 15 Assessment Roll 15 Annexations 15 Page 602 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July 18, 2018, the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 18-056, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed the City Engineer to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2018/19 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay for the acquisition of street lights, the installation of Light Emitting Diode (LED) street lighting, and estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. Expenditures Personnel Services Operations and Maintenance Debt Service Transfer Out Total Expenditures Budget Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection Subtotal - Taxes Transfers In Total Revenues Budget Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance Fiscal Year 2018/19 Budget $ 20,770 89,730 69,400 12,980 192,880 128,590 1,700 130,290 62,590 192,880 Total District EBU Count 3,898.00 Actual Assessment per EBU $ 33.32 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU $ 33.32 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#18 Page 603 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. 2. 1 have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefitted Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, I certify that the Annual Engineer's Report and Assessment Diagram included herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#18 Page 604 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements, the installation of LED street lighting, and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the District for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the District by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the District. • Refers to the Engineer's Report, on file with the City Clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the City Clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#18 Page 605 During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including the improvements, to the zones within the District, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to, the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area of the City known as North Etiwanda, which is generally bounded by Highland Ave on the south, Day Creek Channel on the west and City limits on the east and north. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of street lights, traffic signals and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The maintenance and servicing includes, but is not limited to, furnishing electric current for public lighting facilities including street lights and traffic signals, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in operational and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, in order to lower expenses of the District. In Fiscal Year 2017/18, the acquisition by the City of the street lights and installation of LED street lighting specially benefiting the properties within the District has been added to the improvements. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#18 Page 606 Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of street light and traffic signal improvements to be maintained using District funds. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#18 Page 607 . _...�.. i.s = .. ». ..... • ... •. r ... . �•.•..... CD ... . r...•. _.! : (Q LTJ — — «f •• 0 , (D C_) (n (n o M ••":)0 i N.W.�i:•.•..A». 1. .. .. ...I..•.•• •• f •.•�- .. 0 •'Y. •• so i•NNtr... — • : ; % m co OR, Re J G . _...�.. i.s = .. ». ..... • ... •. N r •1 ... . �•.•..... - -•... ... . r...•. _.! : •00A.- Z ... : r of •� �• «f •• 0 , j ••":)0 i N.W.�i:•.•..A». 1. .. .. ...I..•.•• •• f •.•�- .. 0 •'Y. •• so i•NNtr... ♦ • : ; % •• r : OR, Re J Cherry Av :.r. .,..,..• -. RR, — 7 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#18 Page 608 V. M N Wardman Bullock Rd • .. 1. 0 • «f •• 0 , • -. RR, — 7 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#18 Page 608 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the District levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#18 Page 609 Fiscal Year 2018/19 Budget Expenditures Personnel Services: Regular Salaries $ 14,130 Fringe Benefits 6,640 Subtotal - Personnel 20,770 Operations and Maintenance: Operations and Maintenance: Training 180 Membership Dues 50 O & M/General 4,940 Contract Services 5,630 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 10,800 Utilities: Electric Utilities 57,000 Assessment Administration 18,230 Adm in./General Overhead 3,700 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 89,730 Debt Service: Interest Expense 10,910 Principal Repayments 58,490 Subtotal - Debt Service 69,400 Transfer Out - General Street Lights Fund 12,980 Total Expenditures Budget $ 192,880 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#18 Page 609 Fiscal Year 2018/19 Budget Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies $ 128,590 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 1,700 Subtotal - Taxes 130,290 Transfer In: Transfer In - General Fund $ 62,590 Total Revenues Budget $ 192,880 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ - Total Gross Estimated Assessments $ 129,881.36 Total District EBU Count 3,898.00 Actual Assessment per EBU - Fiscal Year 2018/19 $ 33.32 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU - Fiscal Year 2018/19 $ 33.32 The maximum allowable assessment per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in Fiscal Year 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EDU will be based on the total amount of funds needed to maintain the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however, it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2018 Contribution to Reserve - Fiscal Year 2018/19 Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2019 Operating Reserve $ 78,585 $ 78,585 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#18 Page 610 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time and part-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Additionally, this includes benefits available to City employees. Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District. Utilities: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity and telephone services, as required, for the operation and maintenance of the street lights, traffic signals, and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual Engineer's Report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all central services departments of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational District within the City's administrative structure. Capital Outlay: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include installation of safety lights and other large improvements. Debt Service: This item includes the repayment of interest and principal to the City Capital Reserve Fund for the acquisition of street lights and installation of LED street lighting within the District. Transfer Out - General City Street Lights Fund: This item includes the cost for the replacement and installation of District owned street lights. These costs are incurred in the General City Street Lights Fund and reimbursed by the District. Other Revenues: This includes other revenues that are not levied through the annual assessments that support the District operations. These other revenues may include: interest earnings and Developer Energizing Fees. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#18 Page 611 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Overview Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the public lighting facilities, including traffic signals. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 commencing with Section 5000) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]. Section 22547 of the 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement". Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights -of -ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#18 Page 612 Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, safety, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and • providing for safe vehicular and pedestrian access for properties within the District, and • providing beautification and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the safety and visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District However, it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#18 Page 613 property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined; however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since Fiscal Year 1996/97. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Dwelling Unit ("EDU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land -use is converted to EDUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land -use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land - use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EDU assignment. Land -Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Property Type (County Use Code) EBU Value Multiplier Single Family Residential 1.00 Parcel Multi -Family Residential 0.50 Unit Non -Residential 2.00 Acre The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EDU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EDU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2018/19 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#18 Page 614 Maximum Allowable Actual Assessment Rate Asessment Total Property Type (County Use Code) per EBU Rate per EBU Units/Acres Total EBUs Single Family Residential $33.32 $33.32 3,898.00 3,898.00 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#18 Page 614 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the street lights and traffic signals is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#18 Page 615 gt gaL$gg-- �����9 gCL � �'at asa$ia� -n a;=fa•� D 00 W CD :(1 a x83 Oo O S CD .•_..r.._•._.."'L.._..� �gasggq; (n Zl W S1111119Grove Av �_.._..---•—••— F fn a • :._..� �as� 3aa�'�St � j � hh,, j ar�g �la3,s�� ��• 4 1 Carnelian St Vineyard Av j Hellman Avg i Hellman Av Archibald Av 1 Archibald Av Hermosa Av j Hermosa Av Haven Av y; Haven Av 1 Milliken Av I �.�5 _._.._.._.._.._.a Milliken Av i j r.. ; Rochester Av rr= 1 j Rochester Av � j ' Day Creek B � � (D j c �. Etiwanda Av Etiwanda Av S �2 East Av �_•_•°_•,_°, D m o o � W27 �• �+h N (D Cherry Av M �. o r D. v 4 r D Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#18 Page 616 ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2018/19 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2018/19 actual assessments for the District: Actual Assessment Total Total Property Type (County Use Code) Rate per EBU Units/Acres Total EBUs Assessment Single Family Residential $33.32 3,898.00 3,898.00 $129,881.3E totals 3,898.00 3,898.00 $129,881.3E A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations The following annexations are effective for Fiscal Year 2018/19: Annexation Total Units/ Apn Date Project Name Acres Total EBUs Property Type 1087-261-12 08/02/17 TR18960 12.00 12.00 SFD )225-122-83 10/18/17 DRC2015-00821 1.00 1.00 SFD Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#18 Page 617 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2018/19 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) Page 618 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 8 (SOUTH ETIWANDA) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2700 Fax: 909.477.2849 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Lynne B. Kennedy, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Sam Spagnolo, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director Page 619 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER 1 INTRODUCTION 3 Reason for Assessment 3 Process for Annual Assessment 3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 4 Description of the Boundaries of the District 4 Description of Improvements and Services 4 Map of Improvements 5 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 7 District Budget 7 Definitions of Budget Items 9 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 10 Overview 10 Special Benefit 11 General Benefit 11 Method of Assessment Spread 11 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM 13 ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS 15 Assessment Roll 15 Annexations 15 Page 620 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July 18, 2018, the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 18-056, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Street Light Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed the City Engineer to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2018/19 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay for the acquisition of street lights, the installation of Light Emitting Diode (LED) street lighting, and estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#19 Page 621 Fiscal Year 2018/19 Budget Expenditures Personnel Services $ 25,840 Operations and Maintenance 40,830 Debt Service 18,590 Transfer Out 4,570 Total Expenditures Budget 89,830 Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies 70,250 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 800 Subtotal - Taxes 71,050 Other Revenues 31,100 Total Revenues Budget 102,150 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ 12,320 Total District EBU Count 2,318.78 Actual Assessment per EBU $ 30.60 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU $ 193.75 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#19 Page 621 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. 2. 1 have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefitted Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, I certify that the Annual Engineer's Report and Assessment Diagram included herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#19 Page 622 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements, the installation of LED street lighting, and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the District for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the District by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the District. • Refers to the Engineer's Report, on file with the City Clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the City Clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#19 Page 623 During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including the improvements, to the zones within the District, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to, the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area of the City known as South Etiwanda, which is generally bounded by Etiwanda Ave on the west, Highland Ave on the north and Foothill Blvd on the south. The southern portion of the District is bounded by East Ave on the east and the northern portion of the District is bounded by the 1-15 Freeway on the east. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of street lights, traffic signals and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The maintenance and servicing includes, but is not limited to, furnishing electric current for public lighting facilities including street lights and traffic signals, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in operational and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, in order to lower expenses of the District. In Fiscal Year 2017/18, the acquisition by the City of the street lights and installation of LED street lighting specially benefiting the properties within the District has been added to the improvements. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#19 Page 624 Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of street light and traffic signal improvements to be maintained using District funds. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#19 Page 625 o d�tY7p rt§ar�r 7 x - ls g r ton o 13 a' a r;Laer>E A x a ra \ Etiwanda Av 'il • • I• • • • • • • • • • • o •. S •••.• • n •• .•t • • •• •.•..• y• • i • • •� • • i.• : ,•• • • i 09 go 10 0 OO • . y` • •••• : :• • ••'•Y �� •4:•• ;•. s.• at Opo ` i p M ....� r CO 0 cn m (C) G � O�Z Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#19 Page 626 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the District levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Fiscal Year 2018/19 Budget Expenditures Personnel Services: Regular Salaries $ 17,580 Fringe Benefits 8,260 Subtotal - Personnel 25,840 Operations and Maintenance: Operations and Maintenance: Training 180 Membership Dues 40 O & M/General 4,940 Contract Services 1,980 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 7,140 Utilities: Electric Utilities 22,000 Assessment Administration 7,420 Adm in./General Overhead 4,270 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 40,830 Debt Service: Interest Expense 2,920 Principal Repayments 15,670 Subtotal - Debt Service 18,590 Transfer Out - General City Street Lights Fund 4,570 Total Expenditures Budget $ 89,830 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#19 Page 627 Fiscal Year 2018/19 Budget Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies $ 70,250 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 800 Subtotal - Taxes 71,050 Other Revenues: Interest Earnings Developer Energizing Fee Subtotal - Other Revenues 30,670 430 31,100 Total Revenues Budget $ 102,150 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ 12,320 Total Gross Estimated Assessments $ 70,954.66 Total District EBU Count 2,318.78 Actual Assessment per EBU - Fiscal Year 2018/19 $ 30.60 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU - Fiscal Year 2018/19 $ 193.75 The maximum allowable assessment per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in Fiscal Year 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the total amount of funds needed to maintain the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however, it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2018 Contribution to Reserve - Fiscal Year 2018/19 Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2019 Operating Reserve $ 2,047,468 12,320 $ 2,059,788 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2018/19 8 ATTACHMENT#19 Page 628 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time and part-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Additionally, this includes benefits available to City employees. Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District. Utilities: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity and telephone services, as required, for the operation and maintenance of the street lights, traffic signals, and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual Engineer's Report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all central services departments of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational District within the City's administrative structure. Capital Outlay: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include installation of safety lights and other large improvements. Debt Service: This item includes the repayment of interest and principal to the City Capital Reserve Fund for the acquisition of street lights and installation of LED street lighting within the District. Transfer Out - General City Street Lights Fund: This item includes the cost for the replacement and installation of District owned street lights. These costs are incurred in the General City Street Lights Fund and reimbursed by the District. Other Revenues: This includes other revenues that are not levied through the annual assessments that support the District operations. These other revenues may include: interest earnings and Developer Energizing Fees. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#19 Page 629 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Overview Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the public lighting facilities, including traffic signals. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 commencing with Section 5000) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]. Section 22547 of the 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement". Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights -of -ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#19 Page 630 Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, safety, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and • providing for safe vehicular and pedestrian access for properties within the District, and • providing beautification and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the safety and visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District However, it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#19 Page 631 property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined; however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since Fiscal Year 1996/97. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The EBU method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one EBU. Every other land -use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land -use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land -use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land -Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Property Type (County Use Code) EBU Value Multiplier Single Family Residential 1.00 Parcel Multi -Family Residential 1.00 Unit Non -Residential 2.00 Acre The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2018/19 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the street lights and traffic signals is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#19 Page 632 Maximum Allowable Actual Assessment Asessment Rate Total Property Type (County Use Code) Rate per EBU per EBU Units/Acres Total EBUs Single Family Residential $193.75 $30.60 1,198.00 1,198.00 Multi -Family Residential 193.75 30.60 1,057.00 1,057.00 Non -Residential 193.75 30.60 31.89 63.78 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the street lights and traffic signals is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#19 Page 632 the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#19 Page 633 3 ate= .� M 3 1�a"�9 �'i �ai9�ays s B a atm $g�ta�igY D O o e 9� a�5g rA� Grove AV HIT IT OD 3s}9�a3gsa§�� . Vineyard AV i rn L." � Hellman AV I Archibald AV 1 Hermosa AV i Haven Av! Milliken AV I I � Rochester AV _ Etiwanda AV �2 East AV I 3� i .� M oa OD r Cn cn � D - `1 0 O W � � N (D 5' CD X Cherry AV �-w W N. Q (D rn _ Rochester AV ..Day Creek Etiwanda AV Carnelian St I Hellman AV Archibald AV Hermosa AV Haven AV Milliken AV Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#19 Page 634 ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2018/19 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2018/19 actual assessments for the District: Property Type (County Use Code) Actual Assessment Rate per EBU Total Units/Acres Total EBUs Total Assessment Single Family Residential $30.60 1,198.00 1,198.00 $36,658.80 Multi -Family Residential 30.60 1,057.001 1,057.001 32,344.20 Non -Residential 30.60 31.89 63.78 1,951.66 Totals 1 2,286.89 2,318.78 $70,954.66 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations There were no effective annexations for Fiscal Year 2018/19. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#19 Page 635 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2018/19 City of Rancho Cucamonga Parks and Recreation Improvement District No. PD -85 Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Page 636 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PARKS AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT PD -85 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2700 Fax: 909.477.2849 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Lynne B. Kennedy, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Sam Spagnolo, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director Page 637 TABLE OF CONTENTS AUTHORITY FOR REPORT FINDINGS DISTRICT ANALYSIS ESTIMATE OF WORK District Budget Definitions of Budget Items METHOD OF SPREAD Annexations Boundary Map 2 3 3 5 6 8 8 Page 638 AUTHORITY FOR REPORT This report for the Fiscal Year 2018/19 is prepared pursuant to the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City") and in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act"), being Division 15, Section 22500 of the Streets and Highways code. Provisions for this annual assessment are included in Chapter 3 of the 1972 Act. The purpose of this report is to set forth findings and the assessment analysis for the annual levy of assessments for the Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD -85 (the "District"). This District, using direct benefit assessments, was originally created to provide funds to finance the cost of construction, maintenance, operation and debt payment of Heritage Community Park and Red Hill Community Park in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Subsequently, the debt has been repaid with only the ongoing maintenance and operation with periodic capital improvement expenditures of the parks remaining. FINDINGS Section 22573 of the 1972 Act, requires assessments to be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. The section states: The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. The means of determining whether or not a parcel will benefit from the improvements is contained in the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7, commencing with Section 5000 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California). The 1972 Act also provides for the classification of various areas within an assessment district into benefit areas where, by reason of variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive differing degrees of all territory receiving substantially the same degree of benefit from the improvements and may consist of contiguous or noncontiguous areas. As the assessments are levied on the bases of benefit, they are considered a user's fee, not a tax; and, therefore, are not governed by Article XIII A. Properties owned by public agencies, such as a city, county, state, or the Federal government, are not assessable without the approval of the particular agency and, normally, are not assessed. Certain other parcels used for railroad mainline right-of-way, public utility transmission right-of-way, and common areas are also exempt from assessment. The assessment for mobile home parks will be based upon underlying lot acreage Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD -85 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#20 Page 639 DISTRICT ANALYSIS A. District Boundary The District includes all of the City of Rancho Cucamonga with the general exception of land east of Deer Creek Channel and the Victoria, Caryn and Terra Vista Planned Communities. All parcels of real property affected are more particularly described in maps prepared in accordance with Section 327 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, which are on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor in the Hall of Records, 172 West Third Street, San Bernardino, California and which are hereby made a part hereof by reference. B. District Name City of Rancho Cucamonga Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD -85. C. Facilities The existing works within the District boundary are generally described as follows: The maintenance and operation of Heritage Community Park including, but not limited to, grading, planting, irrigation, onsite roads, sidewalks, parking lots, lighting, restrooms, equestrian facilities, playground equipment, picnic facilities, athletic facilities, and walking, jogging and equestrian trails and sanitary sewer connections. 2. The maintenance and operation of Red Hill Community Park including, but not limited to, grading, planting, irrigation, onsite roads, sidewalks, parking lots, lighting, waterscape, restrooms, senior citizens facilities, playground equipment, picnic facilities, major lighted athletic facilities, jogging trail, sanitary sewer connections and onsite drainage inlets. Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD -85 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#20 Page 640 ESTIMATE OF WORK The 1972 Act permits carrying forward surpluses or recovering deficits in subsequent fiscal years. Costs for the district will be reviewed annually. Any surplus credited against assessment or any deficits shall be included in the assessment for the following fiscal year. District Budget Expenditures Personnel Services: Regular Salaries Overtime Salaries Fringe Benefits Subtotal - Personnel Operations and Maintenance: Operations and Maintenance: O & M/General O & M/Facilities Emergency Equipment and Vehicle Rental Equipment Operations and Maintenance Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance Contract Services: Contract Services/General Contract Services/Facilities Tree Maintenance Subtotal - Contract Services Utilities: Telephone Utilities Water Utilities Electric Utilities Subtotal - Utilities Assessment Administration Admin./General Overhead Other Expenses Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance Capital Expenditures: Fiscal Year 2018/19 Budget $ 143,700 3,680 67,220 214,600 118,910 2,500 6,500 4,500 132,410 341,260 12,740 19,120 373,120 9,570 184,010 137,530 331,110 129,370 45,890 2,960 1,014,860 Captial Outlay - Improvements Other Than Building 65,000 Captial Project 30,000 Subtotal - Capital Expenditures 95,000 Transfers Out: Transfers Out - PD -85 Capital Reserve Fund 116,800 Total Expenditures Budget $ 1,441,260 Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD -85 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#20 Page 641 Fiscal Year 2018/19 Budget Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies $ 1,149,560 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 14,000 Subtotal - Taxes 1,163,560 Other Revenues: Interest Earnings Other Rental/Lease Income Park Maintenance Fees Sports Field User Group Rentals Sports Lighting Fees Other Revenue Subtotal - Other Revenues: Transfer In: Transfer In - General Fund Transfer In - PD -85 Operating Fund Subtotal - Transfer In: Total Revenues Budget Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance 23,330 107,450 6,500 650 39,220 500 177,650 214,250 116,800 331,050 $ 1,672,260 $ 231,000 Total Gross Estimated Assessments $ 1,158,594.00 Total District EBU Count 37,374.00 Actual Assessment per EBU - Fiscal Year 2017/18 $ 31.00 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU - Fiscal Year 2017/18 $ 31.00 Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment; however, it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County of San Bernardino, whichever is later. Beginning with Fiscal Year 2016/17, the City will maintain a Capital Reserve to be used for deferred maintenance and pending capital projects. Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD -85 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#20 Page 642 The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2018 Contribution to Reserve - Fiscal Year 2018/19 Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2019 Definitions of Budget Items Operating Capital Total Reserve Reserve Reserve $1,457,036 $174,931 $1,631,967 153,180 77,820 231,000 $1,610,216 $252,751 $1,862,967 The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time and part-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Additionally, this includes benefits available to City employees. Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District. Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Utilities: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity, water, and telephone services, as required, for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers in the District. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost of all particular departments and staff of the City, as well as consultants, for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual Engineer's Report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all central services departments of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational District within the City's administrative structure. Capital Outlay: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD -85 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#20 Page 643 Other Revenues: This includes other revenues that are not levied through the annual assessments that support the District operations. These other revenues may include: interest earnings, other rental/lease income (cell site tower leases), Park Maintenance Fees, Sports Field User Group Rentals, and parking permits (Metrolink Station paid parking). METHOD OF SPREAD The 1972 Act indicates that assessments may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes costs among all lots or parcels within the District in proportion to the estimated benefit received. A. Definitions The District is divided into three categories for the purpose of determining the assessments as follows: CATEGORY A — includes parcels based on the number of existing residential units within certain ranges of parcel size. CATEGORY B — includes all parcels not defined in Category A or Category C CATEGORY C — includes exempt parcels. Exempt parcels are those parcels listed by the County Assessor's as exempt and/or which have an assessed value of less than $500. B. Formula The assessment formula is based on actual land use information contained in the current San Bernardino Assessor's computer files and Assessor's parcel maps. Category A: All parcels containing existing residential dwelling units and meeting the following conditions. Parcel Size/Range Less than 1.5 Acres and 1.51 to 3.5 Acres and 3.51 to 7.0 Acres and 7.01 to 14.0 Acres and 14.01 to 25 Acres and 25.01 Acres and larger Dwelling Units/Parcel 1 or more dwelling units 2 or more dwelling units 4 or more dwelling units 8 or more dwelling units 15 or more dwelling units 26 or more dwelling units Category A is based on the number of existing residential units. Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD -85 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#20 Page 644 Category B: All parcels not defined in Category A or Category C. Category C: All exempt parcels as defined below: 1. All properties currently tax exempt; 2. All public ownership; 3. Railroad mainline right-of-ways; 4. Major utility transmission right-of-ways; 5. Mineral rights; 6. Parcels so small they currently cannot be built upon; 7. All normally assessable parcels within an assessed valuation of less than $500 and 1.5 acres or less; and, C. Summary of Preliminary Assessment Amounts Category A: The preliminary estimated assessment rate, which will be levied during the Fiscal Year 2018/19, is $31.00 per residential dwelling unit for those parcels in Category A. Category A parcels containing more than one residential dwelling unit will be assessed for an amount equal to $31.00 times the number of residential dwelling units. Category B: The assessment, which may be levied for parcels within Category B during the Fiscal Year 2018/19, shall be according to the following schedule: Definition Assessment Per Parcels Single Family Residential $31.00 Multi -Family Residential $31.00 Less than 1.5 Acres $15.50 1.51 Acres to 3.50 Acres $46.50 3.51 Acres to 7.0 Acres $108.50 7.01 Acres to 14.0 Acres $217.00 14.01 Acres to 25.0 Acres $434.00 25.01 Acres and larger $775.00 Category C: The assessment shall be $0.00 for Category C parcels. Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD -85 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#20 Page 645 Annexations There were no effective annexations for Fiscal Year 2018/19. Boundary Map An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County of San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD -85 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#20 Page 646 111 911:929 a 11-� pgpgT kpkp yyrar3$e„ 44� D 0 N Q °tteis�% opo o m co S R3gg.$R Grove Av cn ��{ oo fD W1 $p!l N R■ �gpglRg $$ 12 sz 3�9�4� R a$1; Carnelian St Vineyard Av rn Hellman Av W Hellman Av Archibald Av Archibald Av Hermosa Av Hermosa Av Haven Av Haven Av Milliken Av Milliken Av i Rochester Av / . Rochester Av Day Creek BI' I I 1 i Etiwanda Av Etiwanda Avi n A Mi 1 i East Av W D 0 -n 00 m i i Vt (A 5 W m W r (D� Cherry Av 1 ®Q00 o D r.1, cLTI r . N 00 Qrl � 1 (D 0 Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD -85 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2018/19 ATTACHMENT#20 Page 647 RESOLUTION NO. 18-074 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAMS AND ASSESSMENTS; APPROVING THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS; AND ORDERING THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 313, 4-R, 5, 6-R, 7, 8, 9 AND 10 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018/19 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 18`" day of July, 2018, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 18-053 (the "Resolution of Intention") pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, as amended (the "1972 Act"), declaring its intention to levy and collect assessments within Landscape Maintenance Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4-R, 5, 6-R, 7, 8, 9 and 10 (each a "District" and collectively the "Districts") for Fiscal Year 2018/19 and giving notice of the time and place for a public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessments within the Districts; and WHEREAS, the City Council previously received and preliminarily approved a report of the Assessment Engineer (each an "Annual Engineer's Report" and collectively the "Annual Engineer's Reports") for each District as required pursuant to Article 4 of Chapter 1 of the 1972 Act, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act (Government Code Section 53750 and following) (the "Implementation Act") (the 1972 Act, Article XIIID and the Implementation Act are referred to collectively as the "Assessment Law"); and WHEREAS, notice of such public hearing was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by the Assessment Law, shown by the affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the Office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received and considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom, and said City Council having now acquired jurisdiction to order the proposed work. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, as follows: SECTION 1. This City Council hereby finds and determines that: A. Notice of the public hearing has been given and the proceedings for the consideration of the levy of the annual assessments within each District have been undertaken in accordance with the 1972 Act; and B. The annual assessments for Fiscal Year 2018/19 proposed to be levied within each District as set forth in the applicable Annual Engineer's Report do not exceed the annual assessments as previously authorized to be levied within such District, and therefore, the proposed levy of assessments for Fiscal Year 2018/19 within such District are not deemed to be "increased" over the maximum authorized annual assessments. SECTION 2. The final assessments and diagrams for the proceedings, as contained in the Annual Engineer's Report for each of the Districts, is hereby approved and confirmed. The assessments for the Districts contained in the Annual Engineer's Reports for Fiscal Year 2018/19 are hereby levied upon the respective lots or parcels in the Districts in the amounts as set forth in the applicable Annual Engineer's Report. Resolution No. 18-074— Page 1 of 2 ATTACHMENT #Age 648 SECTION 3. This City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in the Resolution of Intention, be done and made. SECTION 4. The above -referenced diagram and assessment shall be filed in the Office of the City Clerk. Said diagram and assessment, and the certified copy thereof, shall be open for public inspection. SECTION 5. The City Clerk is hereby ordered and directed to immediately file a certified copy of the diagram and assessment with the County Auditor. Such filing shall be made no later than the 3rd Monday in August 2018. SECTION 6. After the filing of the diagram and assessment, the County Auditor shall enter on the County assessment roll opposite each lot or parcel of land the amount assessed thereupon, as shown in the assessment. SECTION 7. The assessments shall be collected at the same time and in the same manner as County taxes are collected, and all laws providing for the collection and enforcement of County taxes shall apply to the collection and enforcement of the assessments. SECTION 8. The assessments as above confirmed and levied for these proceedings will provide revenue and relate to the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2018 and ending June 30, 2019. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 1St day of August 2018. Resolution No. 18-074— Page 2 of 2 ATTACHMENT #Kge 649 RESOLUTION NO. 18-075 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAMS AND THE ASSESSMENTS; APPROVING THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS; AND ORDERING THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018/19 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 18' day of July, 2018, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 18-0456 (the "Resolution of Intention") pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, as amended (the "1972 Act"), declaring its intention to levy and collect assessments within Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 (each a "District" and collectively the "Districts") for Fiscal Year 2018/19 and giving notice of the time and place for a public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessments within the Districts; and WHEREAS, the City Council previously received and preliminarily approved a report of the Assessment Engineer (each an "Annual Engineer's Report" and collectively the "Annual Engineer's Reports") for each District as required pursuant to Article 4 of Chapter 1 of the 1972 Act, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act (Government Code Section 53750 and following) (the "Implementation Act") (the 1972 Act, Article XIIID and the Implementation Act are referred to collectively as the "Assessment Law"); and WHEREAS, notice of such public hearing was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by the Assessment Law, shown by the affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the Office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received and considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired jurisdiction to order the proposed work. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, as follows: SECTION 1. This City Council hereby finds and determines that: A. Notice of the public hearing has been given and the proceedings for the consideration of the levy of the annual assessments within each District have been undertaken in accordance with the 1972 Act; and B. The annual assessments for Fiscal Year 2018/19 proposed to be levied within each District as set forth in the applicable Annual Engineer's Report do not exceed the annual assessments as previously authorized to be levied within such District, and therefore, the proposed levy of assessments for Fiscal Year 2018/19 within such District are not deemed to be "increased" over the maximum authorized annual assessments. SECTION 2. The final assessments and diagrams for the proceedings, as contained in the Annual Engineer's Report for each of the Districts, is hereby approved and confirmed. The assessments for the Districts contained in the Annual Engineer's Reports for Fiscal Year 2018/19 are hereby levied upon the respective lots or parcels in the Districts in the amounts as set forth in the applicable Annual Engineer's Report. Resolution No. 18-075 — Page 1 of 2 ATTACHMENT #Pge 650 SECTION 3. This City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in the Resolution of Intention, be done and made. SECTION 4. The above -referenced diagram and assessment shall be filed in the Office of the City Clerk. Said diagram and assessment, and the certified copy thereof, shall be open for public inspection. SECTION 5. The City Clerk is hereby ordered and directed to immediately file a certified copy of the diagram and assessment with the County Auditor. Such filing shall be made no later than the 3rd Monday in August 2018. SECTION 6. After the filing of the diagram and assessment, the County Auditor shall enter on the County assessment roll opposite each lot or parcel of land the amount assessed thereupon, as shown in the assessment. SECTION 7. The assessments shall be collected at the same time and in the same manner as County taxes are collected, and all laws providing for the collection and enforcement of County taxes shall apply to the collection and enforcement of the assessments. SECTION 8. The assessments as above confirmed and levied for these proceedings will provide revenue and relate to the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2018 and ending June 30, 2019. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 1St day of August 2018. Resolution No. 18-075 — Page 2 of 2 ATTACHMENT #Page 651 RESOLUTION NO. 18-076 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT; APPROVING THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT; AND ORDERING THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. PD - 85 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018/19 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 18th day of July, 2018, adopt its Resolution of Intention No.18-059 pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, as amended (the "1972 Act"), declaring its intention to levy and collect assessments within Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD -85 (the "District") for Fiscal Year 2018/19 and giving notice of the time and place for a public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessments within the Districts; and WHEREAS, the City Council previously received and preliminarily approved a report of the Assessment Engineer as required by the 1972 Act; and WHEREAS, notice of such public hearing was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by law, shown by the affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the Office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received and considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom, and said City Council having now acquired jurisdiction to order the proposed work. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, as follows: SECTION 1: This City Council hereby finds and determines that notice of the public hearing has been given and the proceedings for the consideration of the levy of the annual assessments within each district have been undertaken in accordance with the 1972 Act. SECTION 2: The final assessments and diagram for the proceedings, as contained in the final Annual Engineer's Report for the District, are hereby approved and confirmed. The assessments for the District contained in the Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2018/19 are hereby confirmed and levied upon the respective lots or parcels in the District in the amounts as set forth in applicable Annual Engineer's Report. SECTION 3: This City Council finds and determines that the public interest and convenience requires the levy and collection of assessments within the District for Fiscal Year 2018/19, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 17- 051, be done and made. SECTION 4: The above -referenced diagram and assessment shall be filed in the Office of the City Clerk. Said diagram and assessment, and the certified copy thereof, shall be open for public inspection. SECTION 5: The City Clerk is hereby ordered and directed to immediately file a certified copy of the diagram and assessment with the County Auditor. Said filing is to be made no later than the 3rd Monday in August, 2018. Resolution No. 18-076 — Page 1 of 2 ATTACHMENT #Rge 652 SECTION 6: After the filing of the diagram and assessment, the County Auditor shall enter on the County assessment roll opposite each lot or parcel of land the amount assessed thereupon, as shown in the assessment. SECTION 7: The assessments shall be collected at the same time and in the same manner as County taxes are collected, and all laws providing for the collection and enforcement of County taxes shall apply to the collection and enforcement of the assessments. SECTION 8: The assessments as above confirmed and levied for these proceedings will provide revenue and relate to the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2018 and ending June 30, 2019. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 1St day of August 2018. Resolution No. 18-076 — Page 2 of 2 ATTACHMENT #Rge 653 DATE: August 1, 2018 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Candyce Burnett, City Planner Vincent Acuna, Assistant Planner Jennifer Nakamura, Associate Planner SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF INTERIM ORDINANCE NO. 935, EXTENDING URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 932 FORAN ADDITIONAL 10 MONTHS AND 15 DAYS, ESTABLISHING A MORATORIUM ON THE ESTABLISHMENT OF NEW OR EXPANSION OF EXISTING CAR WASHES. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Urgency Interim Zoning Ordinance No. 935 entitled "An Interim Zoning Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Extending Interim Ordinance No. 932 for an Additional 10 Months and 15 Days Establishing a Moratorium on the Establishment or Expansion of Car Washes, Declaring the Urgency Thereof" by four-fifths vote by title only. BACKGROUND: Pursuant to State law, Government Code Section 65858, a city may enact an interim Zoning Ordinance on an urgency basis to protect the public safety, health, and welfare by prohibiting any use(s) that may be in conflict with a contemplated change to a city's General Plan, Specific Plan, zoning requirements, or any such change that a city is intending to study within a reasonable period of time. On June 20, 2018, the City Council adopted Urgency Ordinance No. 932, establishing a moratorium on the establishment or expansion of car washes to allow staff time to study the issue and draft changes to the Municipal Code. Per State law, the interim ordinance is effective for a period of 45 days from the date of adoption, unless extended prior to the end of the 45 -day period, which ends on August 4, 2018. An urgency ordinance may be extended at a public hearing by a four-fifths vote of the Council. Staff is requesting additional time to study the issue and draft a code amendment to properly address the impacts created by car wash development within the City. ANALYSIS: There are currently 14 car washes operating in the City. There is continued popularity of car washes among the public, as the convenience and relative low cost of getting a car wash continues to attract customers. Additionally, there are environmental benefits to modern car washes, as they utilize water recycling systems that consume less water than washing a car at home on a driveway. As noted in the June 20, 2018 City Council staff report (Attachment 1), there is concern that the proliferation of car washes without further regulation could have adverse impacts on neighborhoods and Page 654 result in significant, irreversible change to neighborhood and community character, especially as developable land becomes scarcer in the City. Trends in car wash development suggest a movement from full service car washes to less than full service models. Some car washes have started to offer "all you can wash" programs, where customers are allowed unlimited, self-service washes for a flat monthly fee. The relative affordability of this monthly subscription -based service could have the potential encourage more frequent visits to a car wash, increasing traffic impacts. Car washes are often noisy because among other noisy equipment, they require the use of large-scale, industrial vacuuming systems. Car washes also cause an increase in vehicular traffic in surrounding areas. These impacts can be particularly acute when car washes are located near residential uses and when multiple car washes are concentrated in a small area. Car washes surrounded by residential uses may have the potential to expose surrounding residents to excessive noise. As car washes move from full service to express and flex service models, there is also concern that fewer on-site employees may result in less on-site oversight, and therefore less control of impacts that these facilities may have on adjacent properties. The Haven Avenue Overlay District prohibits car washing and detailing establishments within a half mile from the intersection of Haven Avenue Foothill Boulevard, and the intersection of Haven Avenue and 4th Street. Additionally, car washing and detailing establishments are also prohibited within a half mile of another car wash and/or detailing establishment. Except for the Haven Overlay Zoning District, the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code currently does not have citywide development standards to mitigate impacts caused by car washes. Additionally, the City has not fully evaluated appropriate locations within the City where car washes should be permitted. At the time Council considered the initial interim ordinance on June 20, 2018, three car wash applications were under review in the Planning Department. One for a new gas station with ancillary automated car wash which was reviewed by the Planning Commission on July 11, 2018 and is scheduled to be forwarded to City Council for final action. A second application for a modification to an existing car wash was reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission on July 11, 2018. A third application for a new stand- alone car wash facility was submitted for review on June 18, 2018. After public testimony, Council directed staff to ensure that all three applications would be exempt from interim Ordinance 932 and be permitted to continue processing. Since the approval of Urgency Ordinance No. 932 which established the initial 45 -day moratorium on the establishment or expansion of car washes, staff has been undertaking the following activities: • Reviewing land use definitions for car washes to determine if revisions are needed. • Studying issues associated with car washes to determine appropriate locational and operational development standards. • Evaluating the suitability of all land use districts where car washes are currently permitted. • Studying adopted development standards from other California cities to determine any "best practice" standards that might be applicable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and • Drafting a permanent Ordinance for the regulation of car washes City-wide for Planning Commission consideration by the end of 2018. Based on both Planning Commission and Council's direction, staff has placed a priority on studying the issue and drafting revised regulations for car washes. Once staff has drafted revised standards for car washes, the Planning Commission will review the proposed changes and make a recommendation to the City Council for final consideration. Consistent with Section 17.02.020 of the Development Code, any applications that are not complete by the effective date of the permanent ordinance will be subject to the standards outlined in the new ordinance. An application is considered complete when all of the submittal requirements have been satisfied. Two of the applications in process were previously deemed complete and have moved on to the hearings and/or approvals. One application is currently incomplete and staff is awaiting submittal of the required documents and revised plans. Staff believes that continued approval of new or expanded car washes without revised regulations poses a Page 655 current and immediate threat to the public health, safety or general welfare. Without further regulation of their location and operation, there is the potential for significant negative impacts by the development of new car washes or the expansion of existing car washes that cannot be mitigated. FISCAL IMPACT: None COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Enacting an interim urgency ordinance on car washes furthers the City Council's goal of enhancing Rancho Cucamonga's premier community status by appropriately regulating and reviewing car washes to ensure neighborhood compatibility and a high quality of development. ATTACHMENTS: Description Attachment 1 - June 20, 2018 City Council Staff Report Attachment 2 - Development Code Section 17.02.020 Attachment 3- Interim Ordinance No. 935 Page 656 DATE: June 20, 2018 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Candyce Burnett, City Planner Vincent Acuna, Assistant Planner Attachment 1 SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO ADOPT AN URGENCY INTERIM ZONING ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A MORATORIUM ON THE ESTABLISHMENT OR EXPANSION OF CAR WASHES FORA PERIOD OF 45 DAYS. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Urgency Interim Zoning Ordinance entitled "An Interim Zoning Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Enacted Pursuant to Government Code Section 65858 Establishing a Moratorium on the Establishment or Expansion of Car Washes, Declaring the Urgency Thereof, and Making a Determination of Exemption Under the California Environmental Quality Act" by four-fifths vote by title only. BACKGROUND: Pursuant to State law, Government Code Section 65858, a city may enact an interim Zoning Ordinance on an urgency basis to protect the public safety, health, and welfare by prohibiting any use(s) that may be in conflict with a contemplated change to a city's General Plan, Specific Plan, zoning requirements, or any such change that a city is intending to study within a reasonable period of time. If approved, the interim ordinance will be effective for a period of 45 days from the date of adoption, unless extended prior to the end of the 45 -day period. An urgency ordinance may be extended at a public hearing by a four-fifths vote of the Council. Within the past year, the City has received an increasing amount of inquiries regarding the development of car washes. As developable land become scarcer in the City, there is concern that the proliferation of car washes without further regulation could have adverse impacts on neighborhoods and result in significant, irreversible change to neighborhood and community character. Additionally, staff noticed a trend where existing full-service car washes are gradually converting to self-service or express service facilities. These raised questions of staff about how the Development Code regulates car washes and if a revision in standards was needed. ANALYSIS: There are three prevalent types of car washes: full service, express, and flex serve. Full service car washes are usually stand-alone facilities that employ a relatively large number of employees either to wash, hand wash, or detail vehicles. Express car washes are usually fully -automated facilities associated with gas Page 656 stations, and more commonly called drive-thru car washes. Older, unattended self-service car washes where customers wash, dry, and vacuum their own vehicles also fall within the express car wash category, as these types of facilities are typically unattended. Flex serve car washes combine the full service and express car wash models. Customers select a base wash package, drive through an automated wash tunnel, and are then given the option to add optional aftercare services, such as interior vacuum, waxing, and/or a tire shine. All wash customers stay in the vehicle through the automated wash cycle and proceed to vended vacuum stations. Customers who purchased aftercare services follow directional signage to an aftercare center where they turn over their car to an attendant and wait in a lobby while their vehicle is prepared. Flex service car washes usually employ less staff than full service car washes. There are currently no City-wide regulations in effect regarding the operational and locational standards for car washes of any type. There are currently 3 full service, 10 express, and 1 flex service car washes operating in the City, as outlined in the following table (see Attachment 1 for a map of all car washes. Note that car washes within '/2 mile from the City boundaries are also shown for context). NUMBER TYPE NAME ADDRESS 1 Full Service Los Osos Car Wash 10431 Alta Loma Dr. 2 Full Service Deer Creek Car Wash 10340 Foothill Blvd. 3 Full Service Rancho Car Wash 10075 Arrow Rte. 4 Express Grove Self -Service Car Wash 8761 Grove Ave. 5 Express Red Hill Car Wash (Self Service) 8285 San Bernardino Rd. 6 Express Sunrize Car Wash (Self- Service) 8601 Baseline Rd. 7 Express 7-11 Shell (Drive-Thru) 8118 Masi Dr. 8 Express Chevron 12659 Foothill Blvd. 9 Express Chevron 8075 Monet Ave. 10 Express Chevron 8801 Foothill Blvd. 11 Express Circle K 10550 Town Center Dr. 12 Express Circle K 6539 Milliken Ave. 13 Express Tesoro Arco 9280 Haven Ave. 14 Flex Serve Haven Car Wash 8777 Haven Ave. There is continued popularity of car washes among the public, as the convenience and relative low cost of getting a car wash continues to attract customers. Additionally, there are environmental benefits to modern car washes, as they utilize water recycling systems that consume less water than washing a car at home on a driveway. Trends in car wash development suggest a movement from full service car washes to express and flex -service car wash models (see Attachments 2 and 3). Recently, flex -service car washes have started to offer "all you can wash" programs, where customers are allowed unlimited, washes for a flat monthly fee. The relative affordability of this monthly fee could have the potential to encourage more frequent visits to a car wash. As previously noted, there is concern that the proliferation of car washes without further regulation could have adverse impacts on neighborhoods and result in significant, irreversible changes to neighborhood and community character, especially as developable land becomes scarcer in the City. Car washes are often noisy because among other noisy equipment, they require the use of large-scale, industrial vacuuming systems. Car washes also cause an increase in vehicular traffic in surrounding areas. These impacts can be particularly acute when car washes are located near residential uses and when multiple car washes are concentrated in a small area. Car washes surrounded by residential uses may have the potential to expose surrounding residents to excessive noise, as exhibited in one instance at the City of Page 658 San Luis Obispo (see Attachment 4). As car washes move from full service to express and flex service models, there is also concern that fewer on-site employees may result in less on-site oversight, and therefore less control of impacts that these facilities may have on adjacent properties. The Haven Avenue Overlay District prohibits car washing and detailing establishments within a half mile from the intersection of Haven Avenue Foothill Boulevard, and the intersection of Haven Avenue and 4th Street. Additionally, car washing and detailing establishments are also prohibited within a half mile of another car wash and/or detailing establishment. Except for the Haven Overlay Zoning District, the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code currently does not have City-wide development standards to mitigate impacts caused by car washes. Additionally, the City has not fully evaluated appropriate locations within the City where car washes should be permitted. Staff intends to study the issues associated with car washes in order to determine which locations are most appropriate for the use, and the types of development standards that should be imposed on their operation to mitigate any potential impacts. This includes reviewing land use definitions for car washes to determine if revisions are needed, evaluating all land use districts in which car washes are permitted for suitability and study development standards and best practices from other jurisdictions to determine if they would be appropriate City-wide. Staff believes that continued approval of entitlements, building permits, or other approvals for new or expanded car washes poses a current and immediate threat to the public health, safety or general welfare. Without further regulation of their location and operation, there is the potential for significant negative impacts by the development of new car washes or the expansion of existing car washes that cannot be mitigated. Staff presented this topic at the May 23, 2018 Planning Commission hearing, and the Planning Commission considered two options: The first option was to recommend to the City Council to enact an interim zoning ordinance establishing a moratorium on the establishment or expansion of car washes to allow staff to draft a permanent ordinance. The second option was to direct staff to evaluate impacts related to car washes and draft an ordinance without a moratorium. The Planning Commission reviewed each option presented by staff and understood staff concerns about the potential impacts to adjacent uses, particularly residential uses. During the hearing, The Commission recognized that there is a demand for these uses and a desire for the development of new car washes, but being proactive to prevent incompatibility between car washes and adjacent land uses was important as well. The Planning Commission agreed that the current development standards are inadequate to sufficiently address potential impacts of new car washes or expansions to existing car washes to surrounding areas, especially in residential neighborhoods (see Attachment 5, May 23, 2018 Planning Commission Minutes). The Planning Commission unanimously voted to recommend the City Council enact an interim zoning ordinance to establish a moratorium on the establishment or expansion of car washes. The Commission felt that potential impacts such as noise and traffic to neighborhoods could be severe, and determined that a moratorium would be appropriate to allow staff to further study the issue. The Commission further directed staff to draft permanent standards to be presented to the Planning Commission for consideration as quickly as possible, to reduce the impact of a moratorium on new car wash development. FISCAL IMPACT: NONE Page 658 COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Enacting an interim urgency ordinance on car washes furthers the City Council's goal of enhancing Rancho Cucamonga's premier community status by appropriately regulating and reviewing car washes to ensure neighborhood compatibility and a high quality of development. ATTACHMENTS: Description Attachment 1 - Map of Car Washes in Rancho Cucamonga Attachment 2 -Article: Express Exterior Tunnel Carwash makes a Big Splash in Southern California Attachment 3 - Article: The Evolution of Express Exterior Car Washing Attachment 4 -Article: SLO Neighbors say this Car Wash is too Loud Attachment 5 — May 23, 2018 Planning Commission Minutes Attachment 6 — Urgency Ordinance Page 669 Attachment 2 Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Up Previous Next Main Search Print No Frames Title 17 DEVELOPMENT CODE ARTICLE I. IN GENERAL Chapter 17.02 PURPOSE AND APPLICABILITY 17.02.020 Applicability of regulations. This title applies to all land uses, structures, subdivisions, and development within the city, as follows: A. New or altered land uses or structures. Compliance with this title is required to lawfully establish, construct, reconstruct, alter, or replace any use of land or structure. B. Existing uses and structures. An existing land use or structure is lawful only when it was legally established and is operated and maintained in compliance with all applicable provisions of this title. See chapter 17:62 (Nonconforming Uses and Structures) for more details. C. Minimum requirements. The provisions of this title shall be the minimum to ensure the public health, safety, and welfare. For discretionary actions, city officials or bodies have the discretion to impose more stringent requirements than set forth in this title as may be necessary to promote orderly land use development and the purposes of this title. D. Land use permit or entitlement required; limitation on subsequent permits. Land use permits or entitlements are required when a development, as defined in this title, is proposed. No person shall begin construction, occupy, or conduct a use or operation within the city, and the city shall not issue any other permit related to the development, until any required land use permit or entitlements have been approved and the appeals period has expired. E. Other requirements and permits. Nothing in this title eliminates the need for obtaining any other permits required by the city, including the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District, or any permit, approval, or entitlement required by the regulations of any regional, state, or federal agency. F. Effect ofzoning code changes on projects in process. The enactment of this title, or any amendments thereto, may have the effect of imposing different standards on new land uses, development, and/or structures than those that applied to existing land uses, development, and/or structures. Following the effective date of this title the following provisions shall apply. Successive amendments to this title shall specify their applicability to pending applications and projects not yet or under construction; in the event an amendment is silent on this matter, the following shall apply. 1. Pending applications. All land use permit applications that are active and that have been determined by the planning director to be complete before the effective date of this title, or any amendments thereto, will be processed according to the regulations in effect when the application was deemed complete. 2. Approved projects not yet under construction. Any structure authorized by a planning permit or entitlement for which construction has not begun as of the effective date of this title, or any amendment thereto, may still be constructed in compliance with the approved permit, as long as construction is completed and the approved land use is established before the expiration of the permit or, where applicable, before the expiration of any approved time extension. 3. Projects under construction. A structure that is under construction pursuant to a valid building permit on the effective date of this title, or any amendments thereto, may be completed and need not be changed to satisfy any new or different requirements of this title as long as construction is beyond the approval of the first inspection on the effective date of this title, or any amendment thereto, and provided that construction is diligently prosecuted to completion. Such a structure shall be deemed to be a lawfully existing building. G. Conflicting requirements. Wherever conflict occurs between the provisions of this title and any other provision of law, the more restrictive of any such provisions shall apply, except for conflicts between the requirements of this title and any adopted specific plan or special planning area, in which case, the requirements of the specific plan or special planning area shall govern. H. Severability. If any portion of this title is for any reason held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, unconstitutional, or unenforceable, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this title. Page 661 The city council hereby declares that this title and each article, chapter, section, subsection, paragraph, subparagraph, sentence, clause, phrase, and portion thereof is adopted, irrespective of the fact that one or more portions of this title may be declared invalid, unconstitutional, or unenforceable. Code 1980, § 17.02.020. Ord. No. ............................. 855 §4,2012) View the mobile version. Page 662 Attachment 3 ORDINANCE NO. 935 AN INTERIM ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENACTED PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65858 EXTENDING A MORATORIUM ON THE ESTABLISHMENT OR EXPANSION OF CAR WASHES, DECLARING THE URGENCY THEREOF A. Recitals. (i) The City is responsible for adopting and implementing land use regulations within its boundaries. The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code generally regulates the entitlement, establishment and operation of car washes within the City. (ii) The proliferation of car washes throughout the City without due consideration presents an immediate threat to public health, safety or welfare. Car washes are often noisy because, among other noisy equipment, they require the use of large-scale, industrial vacuuming systems. Car washes also cause an increase in vehicular traffic in surrounding areas. These impacts can be particularly acute when car washes are located near residential uses and when multiple car washes are concentrated in a small area. (iii) Except within the Haven Overlay Zoning District, the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code does not specify development standards to mitigate impacts caused by car washes. Although car washes are generally limited to commercial zones upon issuance of a conditional use permit, the City has not developed a comprehensive set of development standards for car washes and has not fully evaluated appropriate locations within the City where car washes should be permitted. (iv) On June 20, 2018, the City Council adopted Interim Ordinance No. 932, establishing a moratorium on the establishment or expansion of car washes. (v) The City has initiated its study of the issues associated with car washes in order to determine which locations are most appropriate for the use, and the types of development standards that should be imposed on their operation to mitigate noise, traffic, and other impacts. Within the Haven Overlay Zoning District, for example, car washes are prohibited within one-half ('/2) mile of the Foothill Boulevard/Haven Avenue and the 4th Street/Haven Avenue intersections. Car washes are also prohibited within one-half ('/2) mile of another car wash. During this moratorium, the City intends to continue evaluating whether such restrictions, and other development standards, would be appropriate City-wide. (vi) After completing this study the City intends to enact regulations specific to car washes. The City intends to complete the required study within a reasonable time. In the interim, the City Council finds it necessary to establish a moratorium on the development of new car washes or the expansion of existing car washes in order to prevent a conflict with the contemplated new policies or regulations. Ordnance No. 935 — Page 1 of 4 Page 663 (vii) Absent the passage of this Interim Ordinance, continued approval of entitlements, building permits, or other approvals for new or expanded car washes poses a current and immediate threat to the public health, safety or general welfare. If this Interim Ordinance does not become effective immediately, but instead becomes effective thirty (30) days after a second reading, the existing moratorium would expire and there is a risk that further harm will be done to prevent the orderly development of car washes in the City. There is therefore an urgent necessity for the City to establish a moratorium on the establishment of new car washes and the expansion of existing car washes to take effect immediately. This requirement is intended to provide the City with an opportunity to continue evaluating and modifying its zoning provisions in order to promote the appropriate development of car washes in the City. (viii) Due to the foregoing circumstances, the City Council finds and determines that the immediate preservation of the public health, safety, and welfare requires that this Interim Ordinance be enacted pursuant to Government Code sections 36934, 36937 and 65858, and that it take effect immediately upon adoption, and its urgency is hereby declared. (ix) A written report describing the measures taken to alleviate the conditions which led to the adoption of the aforementioned Interim Ordinance was issued by the City Council on July 18, 2018, which was at least ten (10) days prior to the expiration of the Interim Ordinance on August 4, 2018, in compliance with State law. (x) Pursuant to Government Code Sections 65858 and 65090, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing on August 1, 2018, at which time the City Council considered this Interim Ordinance to extend the existing 45 -day moratorium on the establishment or expansion of car washes for an additional 10 months and 15 days. B. Ordinance NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council hereby ordains as follows: Section 1. Legislative Findings. The City Council finds that the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct and, based on such facts and the entirety of the record before it, further finds that the establishment and operation of any new car wash or the expansion of any existing car wash within the City before the City has a chance to study current impacts and potential regulation would result in adverse impacts, constitute a nuisance, and present a risk to the public health, safety, and welfare. Section 2. Moratorium Established. Notwithstanding any other ordinance or provision of the Code, the City Council hereby establishes a moratorium on the development of new car washes and the expansion of existing car washes in all zoning districts within the City. During the period of this moratorium, no application for a car wash development or use or any other entitlement or building permit relating to a car wash development or use shall be accepted, issued or approved, excepting any development or use as to which an application has been filed with the Planning Department and the application fees have been paid. For the purposes of this Interim Ordinance, a "car wash" shall have the same meaning as a "car washing and detailing" use under Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 17.32.020.F.7. "Car wash" shall also include an automatic car wash that provides drive-in or drive-through service pursuant to Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 17.32.020.E.22. It shall not include temporary car washes, such as fundraising activities generally conducted at a service station or other automotive -related Ordnance No. 935 — Page 2 of 4 Page 664 business, where volunteers wash vehicles by hand and the duration of the event is limited to one day. Section 3. Ordinance is Supplemental. This Interim Ordinance is additional to and supplemental to, and shall not affect, except as specifically provided herein, any provision of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, which shall be operative and remain in full force and effect without limitation. Section 4. Term. This Interim Ordinance shall take effect concurrent with the expiration of Urgency Ordinance No. 932 at midnight on August 4, 2018, and shall remain in effect for a period of ten (10) months, fifteen (15) days from the date of publication in accordance with California Government Code Section 65858. Section 5. CEQA. The City Council hereby finds that it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the adoption of this Ordinance, and the zoning provisions established hereby, may have a significant effect on the environment, because the Ordinance will impose greater limitations on development in the City, and will thereby serve to eliminate potentially significant adverse environmental impacts. It is therefore not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act review pursuant to Title 14, Chapter 3, Section 15061(b)(3) of the California Code of Regulations. Section 6. Penalty. Violation of any provision of this Interim Ordinance shall constitute a misdemeanor and shall be punishable by a fine not to exceed one thousand dollars ($1,000) or by imprisonment for a period not to exceed six (6) months, or by both such fine and imprisonment. Each and every day such a violation exists shall constitute a separate and distinct violation of this Interim Ordinance. Section 7. Civil Remedies. The violation of any of the provisions of this Interim Ordinance hereby adopted shall constitute a nuisance and may be abated by the City through civil process by means of restraining order, preliminary or permanent injunction, or in any other manner provided by law for the abatement of such nuisances. Section 8. Severability. The City Council declares that, should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence, or word of this Interim Ordinance be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences and words of this Interim Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. Section 9. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Interim Ordinance. ATTEST: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was passed by a 4/5 vote at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 1 st day of August, 2018, by the following vote: Ordnance No. 935 — Page 3 of 4 Page 665 AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEMBERS: Ordnance No. 935 — Page 4 of 4 Page 666 Car Wash Land Use Regulations August 1, 2018 Car Washes in Rancho Cucamonga Hillside Rd Hillside Rd C.h fey E 23rd St CvRege 2 Banyan SL Banyan sc a 3 - Lemon A e 4 Z ls St 19th 5t = 19Fh Sr e sir Grapeland � = CerxiraJ park 15�!+ S- line S. --Be Line Rd Base Line Rd • M 7erro ViiYp E Fpptd Fnnthill BIV Cerate u Td HD Fdcty;u,��a R a f� C KO © ngc ¢ Eprcerter }I�r„'� FR:rovr Hwt• v Army Rte m r Y��" onga ® a 14 `.� Cucamonga �Y North Cucamonga a.. 9 i a r •13i St e' A n UlCiOfFA GAROEIIS ��� Ridge Wilwn Aver Fevu,n fG" C rarer ua,+yan Sc Bany—St ~tt� Basel i ne Are a WEST ENS Fnothill 61vd /f 4&GH SUM J w Kaiser 0 Full -Service MExpress Flex Serve SVM Icy 3lvd Zeros Indicate Car washes w within a half mile outside City boundaries Issues Benefits • Convenience • Relatively Low -Cost • Use less water than washing a car at home, due to use of recycled water Concerns • Noise, especially when located near residential or business uses • Vehicular traffic • Trend towards flex serve car washes may mean less employees and therefore less oversight Ordinance 932 • Adopted by City Council on June 20, 2018 • Established a moratorium on the development of new car washes and the expansion of existing car washes in all zoning districts within the City. • Set to expire on August 4, 2018 • Moratorium does not apply to projects that are: • Deemed complete • Filed with the Planning Department and fees paid Staff Progress/Permanent Ordinance • Reviewing land use definitions for car washes to determine if revisions are needed. • Studying issues associated with car washes to determine appropriate locational and operational development standards. • Evaluating the suitability of all land use districts where car washes are currently permitted. • Studying adopted development standards from other California cities to determine any "best practice" standards that might be applicable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and • Drafting a permanent ordinance for the regulation of car washes City-wide for Planning Commission consideration in ate 2018. Recommendation • Adopt Ordinance No. 935 extending a moratorium on the establishment or expansion of car washes for 10 months and 15 days. DATE: August 1, 2018 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Michael Frasure, Building and Safety Services Manager SUBJECT: LOCAL AGENCY MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR ONSITE WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS UPDATE SUPPLEMENT. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council approve the Local Agency Management Plan (LAMP) update that clarifies errors and omissions in the prior adopted version. BACKGROUND: On June 21, 2017, the City Council adopted the Local Agency Management Plan for Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems that allowed the City to create their own management program specific to the needs of the community and also permitted the City to maintain the existing minimum'/z-acre lot sizes as the threshold for allowing a septic system. The City of Rancho Cucamonga LAMP was adopted by the State Water Quality Control Board on June 16, 2017. Since that time, staff has discovered several errors and omissions to clarify and correct. ANALYSIS: SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGES: Staff recommends the following updates and corrections to the LAMP and its accompanying Chapter 19.28 of the Municipal Code. Typographical errors are not included in the summary of proposed changes, but are included in the body of Attachment 1. Chapter 1, Definitions 1. Seepage Pit, Outside Perimeter Chapter 2, Minimum Site Evaluation Standards 1. Soil Type Map, corrections to Legend Chapter 3, Siting Standards 1. Table 3-1, Seepage Pits, Outside Perimeter 2. Table 3-1, Disposal Field, on Center, Disposal Field 106 3. Footnote 7, Alternate Treatment System and Sewage Holding Tank (Chapter 11) 4. Single Family Residential Developments for Additions and Accessory Structures. Additional installations (i.e., rooms, bathrooms or accessory structures) will not be exempt from the minimum lot size requirements. Page 667 Chapter 4, Procedures 1. Table 4-1, Setbacks. Leach Lines, Setback -Leach Lines Minimum Distance 10 feet center to center distance (see Table 3-1, Note 6) 2. Table 4-1, Setbacks. System Component, Seepage Pits Chapter 8, Leach Lines 1. Dimensions, Item 3. Leach lines shall be installed with a width of no less than 12 inches and no more than 36 inches. Regardless of trench width or materials used, dispersal systems using leach lines shall be designed using not less than 3 square feet of infiltrative area per linearfoot of trench as the infiltrative surface. No reduction of sizing is allowed for the use of chambers (see Chapter 10). Chapter 9, Vertical Seepage Pit Systems 1. Dimensions and Construction Requirements, Number 3. The sidewall depth below the inlet shall not be less than 14 feet. 2. Table 9-1 Design Criteria for Replacement of Existing Private Sewage Disposal Systems. Replace table with several pit sizes including Notes with Chapter updates. FISCAL IMPACT: None. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: MID AND LONG RANGE PLANNING Continue efforts to develop mid-range and long-term goals and vision for the City. ATTACHMENTS: Description Attachment 1 - Update pages as presented Attachment 2 - Ordinance No. XXX Page 668 LOCAL AGENCY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Adopted by Santa Ana RWRCB: June 16, 2017 Effective: August 21, 2017 For Onsite Wastewater Treatment System Page 669 Public Water Wells Figure 1.4 on the following page shows the location of the public water wells within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. For a larger exhibit see Appendix A. Also see Potable Water Sppply. Page 670 • Soil texture — Sand is soil that is comprised of 85% or more sand particles, with the percentage of silt plus 1.5 times the percentage of clay particles comprising less than 15%. Seepage Pit, Outside Perimeter A drilled or dug excavation five (5) to seven (7) feet in diameter with a liner. It is also gravel filled (between the liner and the soil) and receives effluent discharge for dispersal from a septic tank or other OWTS treatment unit. Seepage Pit Cap A cover placed on the top of the seepage pit liner. Septage Septage, or septic tank sludge, refers to the partially treated sludge stored in a septic tank or (less commonly) in a pit latrine. It is one type of fecal sludge. Septage is a by-product from the pretreatment of household wastewater in a septic tank where it accumulates over time. Septic Tank A watertight, covered, receptacle designed for primary treatment of wastewater and constructed to: • Receive wastewater discharged from a building, • Separate settleable and floating solids from liquid, • Digest organic matter using anaerobic bacterial action, • Store digested solids, and/or • Clarify wastewater for further treatment with final subsurface discharge. Service Provider A person capable of operating, monitoring and maintaining an OWTS in accordance with this LAMP. Silt A soil particle or type of soil texture. As a: • Soil particle — Silt consists of individual rock, or mineral particles, having diameters ranging from 0.05 to 0.002mm. • Soil texture — Silt is soil that is comprised of approximately 80% or more silt particles, and not more than 12% clay particles using the USDA soil classification system. Site Page 671 Soil Type Map CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Almond St. Hillside Rd. Banyan Fool Ai s ui > d S y 7 a a' a' E m c a y s 3 LEGEND 90 SQ. FT.1100 GAL. 60 SQ. FT.1100 GAL. Figure 2.1 Page 672 CHAPTER 3 Siting Standards To ensure that Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems (OWTS) do not adversely affect water quality, the government agencies tasked with protecting the public's health and safety have developed siting standards for OWTS. This chapter provides information regarding siting standards such as minimum lot size, setback requirements (including increased setback and notification requirements for OWTS located near public water systems), natural ground slope and density. Setback Requirements The minimum separations listed herein are largely derived from the California Plumbing Code, Appendix H and are measured in feet. In some cases, additions or changes have been made in order to adequately protect public health. Where differences exist, the greater separation prevails, unless waived for cause by the City [as described in Chapter 14 - LAMP Scope of Coverage of the Local Agency Management Program (LAMP)]. The following table provides the minimum requirements for installation of OWTS for either new or existing structures. Table 3-1 Minimum Setback Required From (feet) Septic Tank Disposal Field Seepage Pit Non -Public Water Supply Well" 1100 1002 1502 Public Water Supply Well' 100 1502 200 Buildings or Structures3 5 8 8 Property line, including Street Right of Way Line 5 5 8 Streams and other flowing bodies of water9 100 100 150 Drainage Course 50 50 50 Lakes, ponds, and other surface water bodies10 200 200 200 Large Trees4 10 - 10 Seepage pits, Outside Perimeter 5 5 12 Disposal field, on Center 5 106 5 On -Site domestic water lines (building service line) 5 5 5 Public Domestic Water Lines 25 25 25 Page 673 Minimum Setback Required From (feet) Septic Tank Disposal Field Seepage Pit Distribution Box n/a 5 5 Ground surface on sloping ground n/a 15 15 Groundwater' 5 57 10 i. Drainage piping will clear domestic water supply wells by not less than 50 feet. This distance will be permitted to be reduced to not less than 25 feet where the drainage piping is constructed of materials approved for use within a building. a. For any system discharging 5,000 gallons per day (GPD), or more, the required setback will be increased to 200 feet. 3. Includes porches and steps whether covered or uncovered, breezeways, roofed porte cocheres, roofed patios, carports, covered walls, covered driveway, and similar structures or appurtenances. 4. Any tree with a trunk diameter of one foot or more within 5 feet of the system that will not be removed during construction. s. The highest known level to which groundwater is known to have occurred rather than the level at the time when testing occurred,: http://permitrack.sbcount ov/waw/ 6. Plus 2 feet for each additional foot of depth in excess of 1 foot below the bottom of the drain line. 7. For any system utilizing Alternate Treatment System and Sewage Holding Tank (Chapter 11), this minimum separation may be reduced to 2 feet with approval under the Advanced Protection Management Program (APMP) (refer to Chapter 12: Tier 3 - Advanced Protection Management Program for Impaired Areas for more information regarding the APMP) and the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). s. Unless regulatory or legitimate data requirements necessitate that monitoring wells be located closer. 9. Where the edge of the water body is the natural or levied bank for creeks and rivers, or may be less where site conditions prevent mitigation of wastewater to the water body. io. Where the edge of the water body is the high water mark for lakes and reservoirs and the mean high tide line for tidally influenced water bodies. Slope Setback Requirements On sites with natural slopes of 25% (4:1) or greater, the siting and the design of the leaching system shall be performed by recommendations from a Professional Geotechnical Engineer. The permitted grading plan and the permitted OWTS (a septic plan) shall be prepared by a Professional Civil Engineer and shall follow the recommendation in the Geotechnical report prepared by a Professional Geotechnical Engineer. Minimum Set Back Requirements When reviewing setback requirements, Page 674 Single Family Residential Developments for Additions and Accessory Structures For single family residential developments with an addition, including accessory structures, when the existing septic system will accommodate additional wastewater flows. Additional installations (i.e., rooms, bathrooms or accessory structures) will not be exempt from the minimum lot size requirements. A septic certification may be required to verify the septic tank's and disposal field's capacity to accept additional wastewater flows. When additional structures (accessory structures) are added to existing developments, and these additions will result in increased wastewater flows to the existing septic system, these developments will be considered new developments. This applies to single family residential, commercial, and/or industrial developments. OWTS Systems Replacements There will be times when the replacement of a septic tank/subsurface disposal system will be required for systems in existing residential, commercial, and industrial developments to bring the system up to code, based on requirements by Building and Safety Services Department. For single family residential developments only, replacement of the existing septic tank/ subsurface disposal system may be allowed when the system is proposed and capable to allow additional flows, which result from additions to the existing dwelling unit. Tracts. Parcels, and Commercial/Industrial Developments Tracts, parcels, and/or commercial/industrial developments which received land use approval from the City of Rancho Cucamonga prior to the effective date of the LAMP, are exempt from the minimum lot size requirements and shall not be less than one-half (1/2) acre per this chapter for the use of septic tank/subsurface disposal systems. Combined Lots Smaller than One Half Acre New lots, which are smaller than one-half acre, may be formed by combining through a lot merger two or more existing lots which have received land use approval prior to the effective date of the LAMP. Individually, these lots would be eligible for an exemption from the minimum lot size requirement. Developments on combined lots may also qualify for an exemption: • Provided the total number of units proposed for the new parcel is equal to, or less than the total number of units proposed for the existing parcel, and/or • When an alternative treatment system is utilized. When requesting to use an alternative treatment system, each system will be reviewed on a case- by-case basis, and will require the approval of Building and Safety Services, and the RWQCB. Page 675 OWTS Disposal Systems Dispersal systems for conventional OWTS in the City of Rancho Cucamonga can consist of leach lines, horizontal seepage pits and vertical seepage pits. Dispersal systems for alternative OWTS can also include subsurface drip dispersal systems. See the chapters on leach line, horizontal seepage pit, vertical seepage pit and subsurface drip dispersal systems for more specifics on sizing and design criteria for those systems. Setbacks Setbacks in layout designs refer to the required spacing in distance from components of the OWTS and to structures, property lines, easements, watercourses, wells, or grading. Specific setback requirements will vary based on the type of system design and site conditions and are specified in the following table. Table 4-1 System Component$ Setback Minimum Distance Septic Tank Structure 5 feet Septic Tank Property Line, including the street/public right-of-way 5 feet Septic Tank Water Well 100 feet Septic Tank Leach Lines 5 feet Septic Tank Seepage Pits 5 feet Leach Lines Structure 8 feet Leach Lines Property Line, including the street/public right of way 5 feet Leach Lines Water Well 100 feet ' Leach Lines Leach Lines 10 feet center to center distance (see Table 3-1, Note 6) Leach Lines Seepage Pits 5 feet Leach Lines Water Mains (Public) 25 feet or 10 feet from edge of easement Leach Lines Drainage Course 50 feet from centerline or top of bank' Page 676 System Setback Minimum Distance Component$ Seepage Pits Ground Water 10 feet (vertical) 1. The minimum setback required to a public water well is 150 feet and increases to 200 feet where the depth of the dispersal system exceeds 10 feet in depth. The minimum setback may be increased if site conditions show the minimum setback is insufficient to protect groundwater supplies. 2. Where the dispersal system is within 1200 feet of surface water intake point, the setback shall be 400 feet. Where the dispersal system is greater than 1200 feet of the surface water intake point, the setback shall be 200 feet. 3. Maximum setback of 100 feet. A reduction in setback to 50 feet may be considered with engineering to demonstrate no risk of sewage moving laterally to pipeline trench. 4. The setback may increase if the 5:1 setback to a road cut is greater than the minimum setback. 5. This maximum 100 foot setback would also be applied to the top of an eroded bank or natural slope in excess of 60%. A reduction in setback to 50 feet may be considered with engineering to demonstrate no risk of sewage surfacing on the face of the bank or slope. 6. For trenches less than 2 feet in depth, a 5:1 setback based on the trench depth can be used. 7. Setback increases to a 5:1 setback if drainage is greater than 10 foot in depth. 8. Refer to Table 3-1 for other references. Grading Plan Review Upon approval of a layout by the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Building and Safety Services Department, the City staff will indicate on the layout approval form whether a field check of completed grading is required prior to issuance of the OWTS permit. The City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Services grading approval is not the same as the Planning Department's land use agency grading approval Major and minor grading plans will be reviewed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Services prior to grading to determine impacts to the approved OWTS and adjacent properties. After completion of the grading, the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Services must be contacted to arrange for a field check, unless the field check of completed grading is waived on the layout approval. Page 677 3. Soil cover requirements must also conform to those allowed by the manufacturer of any gravel-less/chamber design. Dimensions Leach lines are to be installed according to the qualified professional's specifications for location, length, width, and depth. 2. Leach lines are to be spaced at least 10 feet apart, measured center to center. 3. Leach lines shall be installed with a width of no less than 12 inches and no more than 36 inches. Regardless of trench width or materials used, dispersal systems using leach lines shall be designed using not less than 3 square feet of infiltrative area per linear foot of trench as the infiltrative surface. No reduction in sizing is allowed for the use of chambers (see Chapter 10). 4. The minimum length of leach trench for a new OWTS using leach lines as the dispersal system shall be 200 feet regardless of the projected wastewater flows. 5. A 100% reserve area shall be required for all leach line systems. Properties that previously were required to maintain areas of 200% or 300% reserve shall now have a 100% reserve area requirement in place of the previous requirement. Materials and Construction Considerations 1. All piping and materials used in leach line systems including gravel-less/chamber systems must have IAPMO approval and must be approved by City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Services prior to installation. 2. Leach lines that utilize gravel shall be filled with clean, washed leach line rock to a point at least 4 inches above the top of a 4 inch perforated pipe and shall have a minimum of 12 inches of gravel below the pipe. The rock shall be graded at 1 to 1.5 inches in size and shall be covered with straw, untreated building paper or a geotextile fabric prior to backfill to prevent the infiltration of soil into the rock. 3. Where multiple leach lines are proposed on sloping ground, a distribution box must be used to connect the leach lines. 4. Leach lines shall NOT be placed under impermeable surfaces. Leach lines that are later covered by impermeable surfaces may not be considered as viable for purposes of determining primary and reserve area requirements. 5. Leach line trenches shall be installed with the trench bottom and materials used being level to within 2 inches per 100 feet. Page 678 Dimensions and Construction Requirements 1. Vertical seepage pits shall be installed according to the qualified professional's specifications for location, depth and cap depth. 2. The pit excavation shall be five (5), six (6) or seven (7) feet in diameter. Pit excavations greater than 7 -feet in diameter require prior approval by the Building Official. 3. The sidewall depth below the inlet shall not be less than 14 feet. 4. The minimum depth to the top of the infiltrative surface allowed is 2 feet. This depth is also known as the cap depth. There is no maximum cap depth but documentation must be provided to justify any cap depth greater than 5 feet. 5. The maximum slope allowed for the use of vertical seepage pits is 40 percent (2-1/2:1 slope). Slopes that exceed 25% (4:1) will require additional engineering and design detail as required to address the risk of effluent surfacing on the slope recognizable as sewage as well as slope stability issues. Slopes that exceed 25% (4:1) will, in most cases, require a terrace design or grading to allow for drilling access. Any grading shall be in accordance with any permit requirements for brushing, clearing, and grading from any other agency. 6. All pits must be filled with clean washed leach line rock to the cap depth. The rock shall be graded at 1 to 1.5 inches in size and shall be covered with straw, untreated building paper or a geotextile fabric prior to backfill to prevent the infiltration of soil into the rock. 7. A 4 inch Schedule 40 pipe shall be installed from the ground surface to the bottom of each seepage pit for clean-out, pumping and verification of the total pit depth. The pipe shall have perforations from the cap depth to the bottom of the pit and be of solid construction from the cap depth to the ground surface. A screw fit cap must be placed on top of the riser to allow access. 8. Where more than one vertical seepage pit is proposed for the primary or reserve system, a distribution box must be used to connect the pits. Chaining or lining the seepage pits together such that the overflow from an upstream pit flows to a downstream pit shall not be permitted. Page 679 Design Criteria for Replacement of Existing Private Sewage Disposal Systems Check Soil Type Map for Minimum Depth of Pits Table 9-1 Notes: *Absorption Perimeter 1. Other variations may be allowed to width and depth so as to achieve the required leach area. Chapter 8 2. Trenches shall not have less than 600 sq. ft. of infiltrative area. Chapter 8 3. All deviations from this handout will require a percolation test with a designed septic system by a licensed Civil Engineer based on percolation test(s) per Chapter 6 — Percolation Test Procedure. 4. Depth of the seepage pit shall be measured from the bottom of the pit to the invert of the distribution pipe. Chapter 9 5. Multiple seepage pits may be used. If this is the case, the required depth from the table above can be divided equally among the numbers of seepage pits. In no cases the depth of seepage pits can be less than the "minimum depth". Chapter 9 6. See Chapter 8 - Leach Line Systems and Chapter 9 - Vertical Seepage Pit Systems for design and construction requirements. Page 680 Minimum Seepage Pit Septic Disposal 3ft A.P.* @ 12" 5ft A.P.* @ 24" 7ft A.P.* @ 36" with Tank Leach Wide Bottom Wide Bottom Wide Bottom Min. 4ft. - Max. 6ft. Dia. Capacity Field Below Leach Line Below Leach Line Below Leach Line Liner (Gallons) (Area (A.A x Length) (A.A x Length) (A. P. x Length) (Diameterx Depth) Req'd) (See Notes: 3, 4, 5 & 6) Field Design at 60 sq. ft./100 gal. Pit Design EL (See Notes: 1, 2, 3, & 6) 60 sq. ft./100 gal. (2) 7 x 100' 1000 600 (2) 3' x 100' (4) 5' x 55' S' x 39' 6'x 32' 7' x 28' or (1) 7' x 200" 1200 720 (3) 3' x 80' (4) 5' x 66' (4) 7' x 52' 15' x 46' 6'x 38' Tx 33' 1.500 900 (3) 3' x 100' (3) 5' x 82' (3) 7' x 70' S' x 58' 6' x 48' Tx 41' it Field Design at 90 sq. ft./100 gal. Pit Design (See Notes: 1, 2, 3, & 6) 90 sq. ft./100 gal. 1000 900 (3) 3' x 100' (2) 5' x 100' (3) 7' x 64' S' x 58' 6' x 48' Tx 41' 1200 1080 (4) 3' x 90' (3) 5' x 72' (3) 7' x 78' S' x 69' 6'x 58' Tx 50' 1500 1350 (5) 3' x 90' (3) 5' x 90' (2) 7' x 100' S' x 86' 6'x 72' Tx 62' Notes: *Absorption Perimeter 1. Other variations may be allowed to width and depth so as to achieve the required leach area. Chapter 8 2. Trenches shall not have less than 600 sq. ft. of infiltrative area. Chapter 8 3. All deviations from this handout will require a percolation test with a designed septic system by a licensed Civil Engineer based on percolation test(s) per Chapter 6 — Percolation Test Procedure. 4. Depth of the seepage pit shall be measured from the bottom of the pit to the invert of the distribution pipe. Chapter 9 5. Multiple seepage pits may be used. If this is the case, the required depth from the table above can be divided equally among the numbers of seepage pits. In no cases the depth of seepage pits can be less than the "minimum depth". Chapter 9 6. See Chapter 8 - Leach Line Systems and Chapter 9 - Vertical Seepage Pit Systems for design and construction requirements. Page 680 Thomas Bros. Map coordinates; Property Lines and lot dimensions; (viii) Percent slope and direction of fall; (ix) Proposed OWTS design detail; (x) All known, recorded easements on or within 20 feet of lot boundaries (open -space, utility, road, waterline, etc.); (A) Source of potable water; Location of all public waterlines on or within 20 feet of property; (xii) Location of all wells on or within 200 feet of property; and (xiii) Any soils testing information, such as deep boring or percolation test, plotted on the design. 5. In preparing a layout design, the following setback requirements shall establish minimum spacing requirements from a component to the OWTS and to structures, property lines, easements, watercourses, wells, or grading: Table 19.28.090.B.3. OWTS Setback Requirements. System Component Setback Minimum Distance Septic Tank Structure 5 feet Septic Tank Property Line, including the street/public right-of-way 5 feet Septic Tank Water Well 100 feet Septic Tank Leach Lines 5 feet Septic Tank Seepage Pits 5 feet Septic Tank Structure 8 feet Leach Lines Property Line, including the street/public right-of-way 5 feet Leach Lines Water Well 100' feet Leach Lines Leach Lines 4 feet center to center distance (See Table 19.28.090.B.3, Note 6) Leach Lines Seepage Pits 5 feet 6 149 Page 681 ORDINANCE NO. XXX ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 19, ARTICLE 28 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ONSITE WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS A. Recitals. 1. Assembly Bill 885, enacted in 2000 by the State legislature and codified in section 13290 through 13291.7 of the Water Code, directed the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) to develop regulations or standards for onsite wastewater treatment systems (OWTS), to be implemented by qualified local agencies. The SWRCB issued those regulations in 2012 as its "Water Quality Control Policy for Siting, Design, Operation and Maintenance of Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems" (OWTS Policy). The OWTS Policy allows local agencies to approve alternative OWTS, based on a local ordinance, after approval of a Local Agency Management Program (LAMP) by the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). 2. In coordination with the Santa Ana RWQCB, the City has developed a city- wide Tier 2 LAMP addressing the required elements of the OWTS Policy. 3. On June 16, 2017, the RWQCB held a public hearing and adopted the city- wide Tier 2 LAMP by Resolution R8-2017-0012. 4. Following RWQCB approval of the city-wide Tier 2 LAMP, the City has prepared this ordinance in order to implement the LAMP. 5. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. 6. The purpose of this amended Ordinance is for clarifying errors and omissions. B. Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council hereby ordains as follows: SECTION 1. The City Council finds that the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. SECTION 2. Chapter 19.28, Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems, is hereby added to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to read as follows: "Chapter 19.28 Section 19.28.010 Purpose 1 Page 682 Section 19.28.020 Definitions Section 19.28.030 City not responsible for damage. Section 19.28.040 Public sewer; connection to. Section 19.28.050 Onsite wastewater treatment systems; when used. Section 19.28.060 Onsite wastewater treatment systems subject to Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board waste discharge requirements; City permit required; fee. Section 19.28.070 General Prohibitions, Violations. Section 19.28.080 General onsite wastewater treatment systems applicability standards; OWTS permit required. Section 19.28.090 OWTS permit application requirements. Section 19.28.100 OWTS permit fees. Section 19.28.110 Refusal to issue building permit. Section 19.28.120 Refusal to issue certification of occupancy. Section 19.28.130 State contractor's license required for installation or repair; registration fee. Section 19.28.140 Construction inspections. Section 19.28.150 Siting Standards. Section 19.28.160 Groundwater and Percolation Testing Requirements. Section 19.28.170 Septic Tank Requirements. Section 19.28.180 Leach Line System Requirements. Section 19.28.190 Vertical Seepage Pit System Requirements Section 19.28.200 Horizontal Seepage Pit Systems. Section 19.28.210 Alternative onsite wastewater treatment systems; Use of alternative systems. Section 19.28.220 Alternate onsite wastewater treatment systems siting and operational requirements; Variances permissible. I Page 683 Section 19.28.230 Sewer wells; cesspools; seepage pits. Section 19.28.240 Holding tanks; portable toilets. Section 19.28.250 OWTS located in proximity to impaired water bodies. Section 19.28.260 OWTS failures; Corrective actions required. Section 19.28.270 Substandard systems. Section 19.28.280 Abandoned onsite wastewater treatment systems. Section 19.28.290 Abatement. Section 19.28.300 Notice of violation. Section 19.28.310 Appeal from denial, revocation or suspension. ONSITE WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS 19.28.010 Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to establish standards for the approval, installation, and operation of onsite wastewater treatment systems (OWTS) within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, consistent with the appropriate California Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) standards and basin plans. The standards are adopted to prevent the creation of health hazards and nuisance conditions and to protect surface and groundwater quality. The City has prepared a Local Agency Management Program (LAMP) for OWTS permitting and regulation throughout the City, and that program has been approved the California Regional Water Quality Control Board for the Santa Ana Region. 19.28.020 Definitions. As used in this chapter, the following terms and phrases have the following meaning: Above Ground Dispersal System means a covered sand bed elevated above original ground surface with an effluent leach field located in the sand bed. Accessory Structures mean a subordinate habitable building which is incidental and not attached to the main building or use on the same lot. If an accessory building is attached to the main building or if the roof is a continuation of the main building roof, the accessory building shall be considered an addition to the main building. Includes habitable structures 3 Page 684 with sanitary sewer plumbing facilities regardless of whether a Building Permit is required, including, but not limited to, barns, guesthouses, second dwelling units, garages, storage buildings/sheds, and pool (swimming) houses/bathrooms. Basin Plan (or Water Quality Control Plan) means a plan which identifies surface and ground water bodies within each region's boundaries, and establishes for each, it's respective beneficial uses, and water quality objectives. Basin plans are adopted by the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) and State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB), and are approved by the Office of Administrative Law. Bedrock means the rock, usually solid, which underlies soil or other unconsolidated, surficial material. Building Official means the Building Official for the City of Rancho Cucamonga is the Building and Safety Services Director and is the officer or other designated authority charged with the administration and enforcement of the current adopted California Building Code, or a duly authorized representative. California Environmental Data Exchange Network (CEDEN) means a central location to find and share information about California's water bodies, including streams, lakes, rivers, and coastal oceans. CCR means California Code of Regulation (CCR, Cal. Code Regs.) is the codification of the general and permanent rules and regulations (sometimes called administrative law) announced in the California Regulatory Notice Register by California state agencies. Cesspool means an excavation in the ground receiving domestic wastewater, designed to retain the organic matter and solids, while allowing the liquids to seep into the soil. Clay is used to describe a soil particle, or type of soil texture: (i) As a soil: Particle — clay consists of individual rock or mineral particles having diameters of <0.002 millimeters (mm); (ii) As a texture — clay is a soil material that is comprised of 40%, or more, clay particles, not more than 45% sand, and not more than 40% silt particles using the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) soil classification system. Cobbles mean rock fragments measuring 76 mm (3 inches) or larger, using the USDA soil classification systems. Director means the Director of the Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Services Department. 0 Page 685 Dispersal System means a type of system for final wastewater treatment and subsurface discharge, which may include a leach field, seepage pit, mound, subsurface drip field, or evapotranspiration and infiltration bed. Domestic Wastewater means Wastewater with a measured strength less than high strength wastewater, which is discharged from plumbing fixtures, appliances and other household devices. Domestic Well means a groundwater well that provides water for human consumption and is not regulated by the SWRCB. Effluent means sewage, water, or other liquid (partially or completely treated, or in its natural state), flowing out of a septic tank, aerobic treatment unit, dispersal system, or other OWTS component. Electronic Deliverable Format (EDF) means the data standard adopted by the SWRCB for submittal of groundwater quality monitoring data to the State Water Board's Internet -accessible database system, Geotracker. Existing OWTS means an OWTS that was constructed, operating, and issued a permit prior to the effective date of the LAMP. Grease Interceptor means a passive interceptor with a rate of flow exceeding 50 gallons -per -minute located outside a building and used for separating and collecting grease from wastewater. Groundwater means water below the land surface that is at, or above, atmospheric pressure. High Strength Wastewater means Wastewater, prior to septic tank or other form of OWTS treatment component, having: (i) A 30 -day average concentration of Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) greater than 300 milligrams per liter (mg/L), and/or (ii) Total Suspended Solids (TSS) greater than 330 mg/L, and/or (iii) A Fats, Oil, and Grease (FOG) concentration greater than 100mg/L. Impaired Water Bodies1303(d) List means surface water bodies, or segments thereof, identified on the Section 303(d) list pursuant to the Federal Clean Water Act, approved by the SWRCB, and the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials (IAPMO) means an association that assists individual jurisdictions, both in the United States and abroad, to meet their specific needs by coordinating the development and adaptation of plumbing, mechanical, swimming pools, and solar energy codes. 5 Local Agency means any subdivision of state government responsible for permitting, installation, and regulation of OWTS within its jurisdictional boundaries; typically a county, city, or special district. Local Agency Management Program (LAMP) means a program for the siting, design, operation and maintenance of OWTS, developed by a local agency, and approved by the RWQCB as an alternate method to achieve the same policy purpose as that of OWTS policy. Major Repair means a repair for an OWTS dispersal system due to surfacing wastewater effluent from the dispersal field and/or wastewater backed up into plumbing fixtures because the dispersal system is not able to percolate the design flow of wastewater associated with the structure served, or for a septic tank as a result of compartment baffle failure, or tank structural integrity; failure such that either wastewater is exfiltrating, or groundwater is infiltrating. Mottling means a soil condition that: (i) Results from oxidizing or reducing minerals due to soil moisture changes from saturated to unsaturated over time, and/or (ii) Is characterized by spots or blotches of different colors or, shades of color (grays and reds), interspersed within the dominant color as described by the USDA soil classification system, and/or (iii) May indicate historic seasonal high ground water levels. Mound System means an above ground dispersal system, having subsurface discharge, used to enhance soil treatment, dispersal, and absorption of effluent discharged from an OWTS treatment unit (e.g., septic tank). National Sanitation Foundation (NSF) International means a not for profit, non-governmental organization which develops health and safety standards, and performs product certification. New Development means a proposed tract, parcel, industrial, or commercial development which has not been granted one or more of the following, on or prior to approval of the LAMP: (i) Approval, or conditional approval, of a tentative parcel or tract map by the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and/or (ii) A conditional use permit, and/or (iii) Approval, or conditional approval, from the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department, and/or Building and Safety Services Department. New OWTS means an OWTS permitted after the effective date of this LAMP. Notice of Condition means a site specific document that is provided to the customer by Building and Safety Services. It is the owner's responsibility to ensure the document is recorded with the County Recorder's office. 0 Page 687 OWTS means onsite wastewater treatment systems that use subsurface disposal, including: individual; community collection and disposal; and alternative collection and disposal systems. This is also referred to as a Private Sewage Disposal System in the current adopted California Plumbing Code and may also be referred to in general vernacular by the public as a "septic system". The definition of OWTS does not include "graywater" systems pursuant to California Health and Safety Code, Section 17922.12. Percolation Test means a method of testing water absorption of the soil by using clean water to determine the dispersal system design. Permit means a document issued by a local agency that allows the installation, use, and/or monitoring of an OWTS. Projected Flows mean wastewater flows into the OWTS determined in accordance with any of the applicable methods for determining average daily flow in the California Plumbing Code. Public Water System means a system for the provision of water for human consumption, through pipes or other constructed conveyances, that has 15 or more service connections (or regularly serves at least 25 individuals daily), at least 60 days out of the year. Per California Health and Safety Code Section 116275(h), a public water system includes any: (i) Collection, treatment storage, and distribution facilities under control of the operator of the system that are used primarily in connection with the system; (ii) Collection or pretreatment storage facilities not under the control of the operator that are used primarily in connection with the system; (iii) Water system that treats water on behalf of one or more public water systems for the purpose of rendering it safe for human consumption. Public Water Well means a ground water well serving a public water system. Qualified Professional means an individual licensed, or certified by a State of California agency, to design OWTS and practice as a professional for other associated reports, as allowed under their license or registration. Qualified Professionals include the following: (i) Professional Civil Engineers; (ii) Certified Engineering Geologists; (iii) Registered Environmental Health Specialists (REHSs); (iv) Registered Geologists; and (v) Geotechnical Engineers. Replacement OWTS means an OWTS that, after the effective date of this LAMP, has its treatment capacity expanded or its dispersal system replaced or added onto. Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) means a regional water board that regulates wastewater discharges to surface water (rivers, ocean, etc.) and to groundwater (via land). It also regulates storm water discharges 7 Page 688 from construction, industrial, and municipal activities; discharges from irrigated agriculture; dredge and several other activities with practices that could degrade water quality. Sand means a soil particle or type of soil texture. As a: (i) Soil particle — and consists of individual rock, or mineral particles, having diameters ranging from 0.05 to 2.Omm; and (ii) Soil texture — Sand is soil that is comprised of 85% or more sand particles, with the percentage of silt plus 1.5 times the percentage of clay particles comprising less than 15%. Seepage Pit, Outside Perimeter means a drilled or dug excavation five (5) to seven (7) feet in diameter with a liner. It is also gravel filled (between the liner and the soil) and receives effluent discharge for dispersal from a septic tank or other OWTS treatment unit. Seepage Pit Cap means a cover placed on the top of the seepage pit liner. Septage means septic tank sludge, in particular the partially treated sludge stored in a septic tank or (less commonly) in a pit latrine. It is one type of fecal sludge. Septage is a by-product from the pretreatment of household wastewater in a septic tank where it accumulates over time. Septic Tank means a watertight, covered, receptacle designed for primary treatment of wastewater and constructed to: (i) Receive wastewater discharged from a building; (ii) Separate settleable and floating solids from liquid; (iii) Digest organic matter using anaerobic bacterial action; (iv) Store digested solids, and/or (v) Clarify wastewater for further treatment with final subsurface discharge. Service Provider means a person capable of operating, monitoring and maintaining an OWTS in accordance with this chapter. Silt means a soil particle or type of soil texture. As a: (i) Soil particle — Silt consists of individual rock, or mineral particles, having diameters ranging from 0.05 to 0.002mm; (ii) Soil texture — Silt is soil that is comprised of approximately 80% or more silt particles, and not more than 12% clay particles using the USDA soil classification system. Site means the location of the OWTS and/or a reserve dispersal area, capable of disposing 100% of the design flow from all the sources the OWTS is intended to serve. Site Evaluation means an assessment of the characteristics of the site, sufficient to determine its suitability for an OWTS that meets the requirements of this LAMP. Soil means the naturally occurring body of porous mineral and organic materials on the land surface, which is composed of: (i) Unconsolidated Page 689 materials, including sand, silt, and clay sized particles; (ii) Varying amounts of larger fragments and organic matter; (iii) Earthen material with particles smaller than 0.08 inches (2mm) in size. Soil Texture means the soil class that describes the relative amount of sand, clay, silt, and combinations thereof. State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) means the five member State Water Board, which develops statewide water protection plans and establishes water quality standards. Supplemental Treatment means any OWTS, or component thereof, which performs additional wastewater treatment so the effluent meets performance requirements prior to the discharge of effluent into the dispersal field. This excludes septic and/or dosing tanks. Structure means a new separate stand-alone building which is separate from the main structure and does not have a common roof line with the main structure and which requires a plumbing permit. Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program (SWAMP) means a unifying program created to fulfill the Legislature's mandate for the coordination of all water quality monitoring conducted by the State and RWQCBs. It is managed by a roundtable of monitoring coordinators from the SWRCB and nine RWQCBs. Telemetric means the ability to automatically measure and transmit OWTS data by wire, radio, or other means. Total Coliform means a group of bacteria consisting of several genera belonging to the family Enterobacteriaceae, which includes Escherichia coli (E. coli) bacteria. Tract means the development of more than one (1) lot or parcel, and/or more than one (1) structure discharging sewage wastes. USDA means the United States Department of Agriculture which provides leadership regarding food, agriculture, natural resources, and related issues. Waste Discharge Requirement means a permit issued for operation and discharge of waste pursuant to California Water Code Section 13260. 19.28.030 City not responsible for damage. The city is not liable or responsible for damage resulting from the defective construction of any OWTS as herein provided, nor will the city or any official 9 Page 690 or employee thereof be liable or responsible by reason of any inspection authorized hereunder. 19.28.040 Public sewer; connection to. A. Every property where there is proposed a residence, place of business, or other building or place which people occupy, or where persons congregate, reside, or are employed, and which abuts a street or alley located within an established sewer service district and outside such districts where required by the RWQCB, or which property line is within 200 feet of an approved available sanitary sewer, must be connected to the sanitary sewer in the most direct manner possible, provided a right-of-way and any necessary approval from the sewer service provider is first obtained. B. On property where an OWTS exists, and where such property abuts a street or alley located within an established sewer service district and outside such districts where required by the RWQCB, or which property line is within 200 feet of an approved available sanitary sewer, connection to the available sanitary sewer will be required at the time of system failure or when the building is remodeled, increased in square footage or altered in a manner as to change uninhabitable space into habitable space provided any necessary approval from the appropriate sewer authority is first obtained. C. The 200 foot connection requirement in subsections A and B above shall increase by 100 feet for each additional dwelling unit for any development in excess of a single family dwelling. For example, a 10 unit development will be required to connect to an available sanitary sewer if the sanitary sewer is within 1,100 feet [200 + (9 x 100 feet) = 1,100 feet] of the proposed development. 19.28.050 Onsite wastewater treatment systems; when used. A. Every residence, place of business, or other building, or place where persons congregate, reside, or are employed, and which cannot be connected to a sanitary sewer, must be provided with a water flush toilet connected to an approved OWTS. B. Every building, structure, or appurtenance that contains one or more waste producing fixtures such as toilets, sinks, showers or bathtubs, clothes washing machines, dish washing machines, animal wash pads, floor drains or other fixture or fittings intended to drain organic or inorganic waste material must be connected to an approved OWTS that meets the requirements of this chapter. C. Subject to local zoning restrictions and planning approval, multiple buildings on the same parcel, such as a main house and detached 10 Page 691 living unit or two or more agricultural housing units, may be served by a common OWTS located on that parcel, provided the OWTS is determined to have sufficient treatment and dispersal capacity for the expected wastewater flow from all buildings or facilities connected to the OWTS. 19.28.060 Onsite wastewater treatment systems subject to Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board waste discharge requirements; City permit required; fee. A. Review and approval by the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board is required for OWTS in cases where: (a) the peak wastewater flow handled by the OWTS is more than 10,000 gallons per day; (b) the OWTS is a categorized as a community system, which serves multiple discharges under separate ownership; (c) OWTS receiving high strength wastewater, unless the waste stream: (i) is from a commercial food service facility with BOD less than 900 mg/L and (ii) has a properly functioning oil/grease interceptor; (d) wastewater treatment plants of any kind or size; or (e) the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board has otherwise determined that their review and approval is necessary and appropriate for water quality protection. OWTS that are subject to the requirements and approval of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board are also required to obtain approval of the Director in accordance with the following: 1. The proposed system must be designed to accommodate the waste discharge consistent with the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board. 2. The Director will require engineered sewerage plans to be submitted by a registered civil engineer or a registered environmental health specialist with experience in OWTS design before issuing a permit. 3. A registered civil engineer, professional geologist or a registered environmental health specialist will be required to inspect the construction of the OWTS and, upon completion, to submit a letter of certification to the Director verifying the proper installation and operation of the OWTS; 4. Site evaluations, plan submittals, design and construction details, inspection, and operation and maintenance shall be consistent with guidelines and procedures prescribed by this chapter. 5. The applicant must obtain a permit(s) from the Director and pay a permit fee(s) in an amount established by resolution of the city council. Obtaining a land use permit of approval is not a substitute for an 11 Page 692 OWTS permit issued by the Building and Safety Services Department, nor does it guarantee issuance of an OWTS permit. 19.28.070 General Prohibitions, Violations. A. No person may construct, add to, repair, alter or maintain any OWTS, sewer pipes or conduits, or any other conduits for the treatment or discharge of sewage, impure waters, or any matter or substance offensive, injurious, or dangerous to health so as to cause any of the following to occur: 1. Sewage, impure waters, or any matter or substance offensive, injurious, or dangerous to health to empty, flow, seep, or drain onto the surface of any land. 2. Sewage, impure waters, or any matter or substance offensive, injurious, or dangerous to health to empty, flow, seep, drain into, or affect any well, spring, stream, river, lake, or other waters. 3. Result in any condition which, in the opinion of the director, is unsafe or dangerous, or creates a nuisance. B. A violation of this section is hereby declared a public nuisance. 19.28.080 General onsite wastewater treatment systems applicability standards; OWTS permit required. When a community sanitary sewer is not available and the property improvement will generate wastewater, the property owner must obtain an OWTS Permit from the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Services Department. Any person, association, partnership or corporation desiring an OWTS Permit shall make an application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Services Department on a form provided by the City. In addition to any requirements outlined in this chapter 19.28, a lot will be deemed to support onsite wastewater disposal if the OWTS permit applicant demonstrates the following: A. Soils are conducive to onsite wastewater disposal; B. A sanitary sewer is not available within 200 feet of the lot; an additional 100 feet shall be added per each dwelling unit proposed thereafter; C. Enough area is available to install an OWTS that meets property setbacks. For new construction, 100% expansion area must be available; 12 Page 693 D. OWTS will not impact ground or surface water quality; E. OWTS is appropriately sized to serve the intended land use; and F. For new industrial or commercial development projects utilizing septic tank -subsurface disposal systems, the wastewater flow for each one-half acre gross area of land may not exceed that from a three-bedroom, two -bathroom single family -dwelling unit. For determining compliance with this criterion, a flow rate of 300 gallons per day shall be considered as the flow equivalent to that from a three-bedroom, two-bedroom single-family dwelling unit. Exemptions will not be granted for industrial or commercial parcels less than gross one-half acre in size. 19.28.090 OWTS permit application requirements. The OWTS permit application shall be submitted on a form provided by the City. In accordance with the requirements of the OWTS permit application, the OWTS permit applicant must prepare and submit the following supplemental documents: (i) a percolation test, (ii) a proposed layout design, (iii) a grading plan, (iv) a building plan, (v) access to a potable water supply, (vi) and all preliminary plans required for all necessary grading and building permits. These supplemental documents shall be prepared as follows: A. Percolation Test Required. A percolation test is required when grading or other soil disturbance has occurred in the proposed OWTS location or if the applicant desires not to use the City's standard percolation rates. The applicant shall submit a percolation test report and design as performed by a registered civil engineer, registered geologist licensed by the State of California Board of Professional Engineers. All percolation testing shall be performed in accordance with Section 9.28.160. B. Layout Design Required. With percolation test data and other data in hand, the applicant must develop and submit a Layout Design for the proposed building project and specific OWTS, for review by the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Services Department. All OWTS layout design proposals shall demonstrate a one hundred (100%) percent reserve area for the active OWTS. The Layout Design must take percolation test data into account. In some cases, additional testing will include depth to groundwater measurements during a normal average rainfall year. In the alternative, the applicant may use the depth to ground water value used by the County of San Bernardino Stormwater Facility Mapping Tool. In some cases, the City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Page 694 Building and Safety may conclude that a conventional or alternative OWTS cannot be safely used on the lot. Due to the potential for delays or disapproval, City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety recommends that applicants submit a Layout Design and obtain an approval before incurring costs for detailed building plans and architectural fees. The approved Layout Design will state whether a field check of completed grading by the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Services is required. The Layout Design Approval shall expire after one year from the date of issuance. 1. A layout design drawing of the proposed building construction and OWTS is required. This drawing should be prepared using standard engineer's scale on 8.5" x 11" or 11" x 17" minimum size paper. The basis for the OWTS design will be from percolation testing data and/or conditions of approval from a recorded subdivision map, parcel map, boundary adjustment, or certificate of compliance. The size of the OWTS is a function of the anticipated peak sewage flow based on the number of bedrooms, dwellings or use, and the percolation rate of the soil on the site. 2. The layout design must include the property drawn to the following minimum scales: (i) Single Family Home or Small Commercial Properties — 1 inch = 30 feet; (ii) Parcel Map, Subdivisions, Large Commercial Properties - 1 inch = 40 feet and must also show the proposed system, and 100% expansion area, including existing and potential structures, wells, streams, contours, significant vegetation (including trees), rock outcroppings, the location of all borings/tests, and the proposed house pad. 3. The proposed dwelling or development site must be located so the initial subsurface sewage disposal system (and the required 100% expansion area) functions by gravity flow, unless otherwise approved. When leach lines or pits serve a common system for two or more units, add 30% more square footage to the total absorption area, if approved by the Planning Department and Building and Safety Services Department. 4. The Layout Design shall contain the following information: (i) Site Address; (ii) Owner's Name, mailing address, and phone number; Consultant's/Contractor's name, mailing address, and phone number; (iii) Type of proposed construction residential vs. commercial); (iv) Number of existing or proposed bedrooms; (v) Purpose of project (e.g. new 14 Page 695 dwelling, new structure, guesthouse, an addition, etc.); (vi) Specify scope of work; (vii) Vicinity Map, Scale, North arrow, Thomas Bros. Map coordinates; Property Lines and lot dimensions; (viii) Percent slope and direction of fall; (ix) Proposed OWTS design detail; (x) All known, recorded easements on or within 20 feet of lot boundaries (open -space, utility, road, waterline, etc.); (xi) Source of potable water; Location of all public waterlines on or within 20 feet of property; (xii) Location of all wells on or within 200 feet of property; and (xiii) Any soils testing information, such as deep boring or percolation test, plotted on the design. 5. In preparing a layout design, the following setback requirements shall establish minimum spacing requirements from a component to the OWTS and to structures, property lines, easements, watercourses, wells, or grading: Table 19.28.090.8.3. OWTS Setback Requirements. System Component Setback Minimum Distance Septic Tank Structure 5 feet Septic Tank Property Line, including the street/public right-of-way 5 feet Septic Tank Water Well 100 feet Septic Tank Leach Lines 5 feet Septic Tank Seepage Pits 5 feet Leach Lines Structure 8 feet Leach Lines Property Line, including the street/public right-of-way 5 feet Leach Lines Water Well 100' feet Leach Lines Leach Lines 10 feet center to center distance (See Table 19.28.090.B.3, Note 6) Leach Lines Seepage Pits 5 feet Leach Lines Water Mains (Public) 25 feet or 10 feet from the edge of easement 15 Page 696 Leach Lines Drainage Course 50 feet from centerline or top of bank' Leach Lines Flowing Stream/Creek 100 feet from spillway elevation Leach Lines Pond or Lake 100 feet from the high water line Leach Lines Water Supply Reservoir 200 to 400 feet from the high water line Leach Lines Aqueduct 5:1 setback to pipeline Leach Lines Road Easements/ Right -of- 5 feet from the edge of way ultimate easement width' Leach Lines Cut Slopes 5:1 setback from top of cut slopes Leach Lines Private Utility Trenches 56 feet Leach Lines Ground Water 5 (vertical) feet Seepage Pits Structure 8 feet Seepage Pits Property Line, including the 8 feet street/public right-of-way Seepage Pits Water Well 150' feet Seepage Pits Seepage Pits 12 feet from edge of excavation Seepage Pits Water Mains (Public) 25 feet or 10 feet from edge of easement Seepage Pits Drainage Course 50 feet from centerline or top of bank' Seepage Pits Flowing Stream/Creek 100 feet from edge of flow line or top of bank Seepage Pits Pond or Lake 100 feet from the spillway elevation 16 Page 697 Seepage Pits Water Supply Reservoir 200 to 400 feet from the high water line' Seepage Pits Aqueduct 5:1 setback to pipeline3 Seepage Pits Road Easements/ Right -of- way 8 feet from edge of ultimate easement width4 Seepage Pits Cut Slopes 5:1 set back from top of cut slopes Seepage Pits Private Utility Trenches 56 feet Seepage Pits Groundwater 10 feet (vertical) Notes: 1. The minimum setback required to a public water well is 150 feet and increases to 200 feet where the depth of the dispersal system exceeds 10 feet in depth. The minimum setback may be increased if site conditions show the minimum setback is insufficient to protect groundwater supplies. 2. Where the dispersal system is within 1200 feet of surface water intake point, the setback shall be 400 feet. Where the dispersal system is greater than 1200 feet of the surface water intake point, the setback shall be 200 feet. 3. Maximum setback of 100 feet. A reduction in setback to 50 feet may be considered with engineering to demonstrate no risk of sewage moving laterally to pipeline trench. 4. The setback may increase if the 5:1 setback to a road cut is greater than the minimum setback. 5. This maximum 100 -foot setback would also be applied to the top of an eroded bank or natural slope in excess of 60%. A reduction in setback to 50 feet may be considered with engineering to demonstrate no risk of sewage surfacing on the face of the bank or slope. 6. For trenches less than 2 feet in depth, a 5:1 setback based on the trench depth can be used. 7. Setback increases to a 5:1 setback if drainage is greater than 10 foot in depth. 17 Page 698 8. Refer to 19.28.090 "Siting Requirements" for other references. C. Grading Plan Review. Following Layout Design Review, a Grading Plan Review may be required by the Building and Safety Services Department as a condition of approval of the OWTS Layout Design. A field check may also be required upon completion of grading. D. Building Plan Review. Plans for a new or second dwellings must be submitted to the Planning Services Department for processing and approval. Upon submittal of the plans, the owner/agent shall meet with staff at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Services counter for a verification of bedrooms and plot plan concurrence with the approved layout. Bedrooms are used to determine the potential occupancy of a dwelling and therefore the potential amount of wastewater that will be generated. Guidelines for Determining the Number of Bedrooms: 1. Once the living room, dining room, family room, kitchen, bathrooms, and utility rooms have been established, all other rooms shall be considered as potential sleeping rooms. Dens, libraries, studies, weight rooms, sewing rooms, workshops, etc., shall be determined as bedrooms if they do not conform to the criteria listed below. 2. All other habitable rooms totaling at least seventy (70) square feet in size are to be considered bedrooms suitable for sleeping purposes, regardless of whether or not they contain closets or have direct access to a bathroom. 3. Rooms that open to a living room, dining room, family room, kitchen, or entry way, and have a single, un -obstructive opening (no doors) with a minimum 50% opening of the total wall space (minimum 6' wide) with archways or other acceptable means shall not be considered as bedrooms, due to the lack of personal privacy presented by the opening. 4. Rooms that can only be accessed through another bedroom are to be considered part of that bedroom, such as master suite and not an additional bedroom. 5. Any cases, which will require the relocation or modification of doorways, are to be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department and Building and Safety Services to address any structural considerations such as load bearing walls. This is to be done prior to approval or sign -off by the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Services. 18 Page 699 E. Proof of Potable Water Supply Required. The applicant must demonstrate the proposed development's access to a potable water supply. A public water supply should be confirmed with proof of a service availability letter from the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), or a water bill showing the property is served by a local water agency. The use of any new domestic water well will require proof of potability and be subject to reviews and approvals by all agencies involved. A copy of the Well Laboratory Report that indicates the absence of bacteria and nitrate contamination of less than 10 mg/1 of Nitrate -N or 45 mg/1 of nitrate will be necessary for proof of potability of a private well. The date of the test cannot be more than one year old. If a valid test does not exist, the well must be sampled by client's consultant for bacteriological and nitrate levels. Hand -dug water wells will not be accepted as a potable water supply. F. The applicant shall submit all preliminary plans and applications to the Planning Services Department for review prior to obtaining all necessary grading and building permits. G. An OWTS installation permit will be valid for one hundred eighty (180) days, which period shall commence at the date of issuance. Upon the expiration of the initial one hundred eighty (180) day period, the property owner or contractor may request an extension of an additional one hundred eighty (180) day period. H. Once the OWTS installation permit has been obtained, the OWTS may be installed. The OWTS shall be inspected by the city Building and Safety Services Department before the system may be backfilled. If inspection is satisfactory, the city shall approve a final OWTS permit. Any change in the OWTS plans after the issuance of a permit must first be approved by the Director. Failure to obtain approval from the Director will invalidate the permit. I. The approval or permit cannot be transferred. Failure to obtain an OWTS permit from the Department of Building and Safety Services is a violation of this chapter. The Director may revoke a permit or approval issued pursuant to this chapter in case of any false statement, or misrepresentation of fact in the application or on the plans on which the permit or approval was based. 19.28.100 OWTS permit fees. Permit fees for OWTS subject to this chapter and all related fees will be an amount established by resolution of the City Council. 19.28.110 Refusal to issue building permit. 19 Page 700 No building permit may be issued for any building requiring a sewage disposal system that is not to be connected to an approved sanitary sewer unless the applicant has received an OWTS permit. 19.28.120 Refusal to issue certification of occupancy. A. No certification of occupancy may be issued for any building that is not connected to an approved sanitary sewer unless the applicant has received an OWTS permit. B. No person may occupy or otherwise use any premises or building that has not been connected to an approved sanitary sewer or approved OWTS. 19.28.130 State contractor's license required for installation or repair; registration fee. A. No person may install, construct, alter, enlarge, reconstruct, replace, improve, recondition or repair an OWTS pursuant to this chapter unless: the person possesses a general engineering contractor's license (class A) as defined in section 7056 of the Business and Professions Code, or a Class C-42 sanitation system contractor's license or Class C-36 plumbing contractor's license from the Contractors State License Board of the State of California. B. The property owner may construct or repair an OWTS on his/her own property, which system serves or will serve the building on the property that is neither being offered for sale nor intended to be so offered, provided: 1. Persons hired by the owner to do the subject work must comply with section 19.28.080(a); or 2. Persons hired by the owner must be hired as employees of the owner and the owner must provide workman's compensation insurance, as required by law; and 3. An OWTS permit is first obtained. 19.28.140 Construction inspections. A stamped copy of the building plans for the approved OWTS must be kept available at the jobsite during system installation and until the system passes final inspection by the Director of Building and Safety Services. Inspections of each new installation must be made to ensure compliance with all the requirements of this Code. Requests for inspection must be made at least one business day in advance of the commencement of work. In the event the Director of Building and Safety Services determines there 20 Page 701 has been an improper installation, a stop -work order may be posted on the jobsite. Before any further work is done on a posted system, clearance from the Director of Building and Safety Services must be obtained. 19.28.150 Siting Standards. A. Setback Requirements. The following table provides the minimum requirements for the installation of OWTS for either new or existing structures. Table 19.28.150.A. Setback Requirements. Minimum Setback Required From (feet) Septic Tank Disposal Field Seepage Pit Non -Public Water Supply Well' 8,8 1008 1002 1502 Public Water Supply Well' 100 1502 200 Buildings or Structures3 5 8 8 Property line, including Street Right of Way Line 5 5 8 Streams and other flowing bodies of water' 100 100 150 Drainage Course 50 50 50 Lakes, ponds, and other surface water bodies10 200 200 200 Large Trees4 10 - 10 Seepage pits, Outside Perimeter 5 5 12 Disposal field, on Center 5 106 5 Onsite domestic water lines (building service line) 5 5 5 Public Domestic Water Lines 25 25 25 Distribution Box n/a 5 5 Ground surface on sloping ground n/a 15 15 Groundwater5 5 57 10 21 Page 702 Notes: 1. Drainage piping will clear domestic water supply wells by not less than 50 feet. This distance will be permitted to be reduced to not less than 25 feet where the drainage piping is constructed of materials approved for use within a building. If the dispersal system does not exceed 10 feet in depth, then the horizontal sanitary setback will be 150 feet. If the dispersal system exceeds 10 feet in depth, then the horizontal sanitary setback will be 200 feet. If the dispersal system exceeds 20 feet in depth, then the horizontal sanitary setback will be 600 feet. 2. For any system discharging 5,000 gallons per day (GPD), or more, the required setback will be increased to 200 feet. 3. Includes porches and steps whether covered or uncovered, breezeways, roofed porte cocheres, roofed patios, carports, covered walls, covered driveway, and similar structures or appurtenances. 4. Any tree with a trunk diameter of one foot or more within 5 feet of the system that will not be removed during construction. 5. The highest known level to which groundwater is known to have occurred rather than the level at the time when testing occurred. 6. Plus 2 feet for each additional foot or depth in excess of 1 foot below the bottom of the drain line. 7. For any system utilizing Alternate Treatment System and Sewage Holding Tank (Chapter 11), this minimum separation may be reduced to 2 feet with approval under the Advanced Protection Management Program (APMP) (refer to Chapter 12: Tier 3 - Advanced Protection Management Program for Impaired Areas for more information regarding the APMP) and the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). 8. Unless regulatory or legitimate data requirements necessitate that monitoring wells be located closer. 9. Where the edge of the water body is the natural or levied bank for creeks and rivers, or may be less where site conditions prevent mitigation of wastewater to the water body. 10. Where the edge of the water body is the high water mark for lakes and reservoirs and the mean high tide line for tidally influenced water bodies. 22 Page 703 B. On sites with natural slopes of 25% or greater, the siting and design of the leaching system shall be performed in accordance with recommendations prepared by a licensed professional geotechnical engineer. C. Criteria specified in Table 19.28.150.A, above must be met within the area of the proposed system and within the 100% expansion area for the proposed system. Depth of earth cover required over the dispersal field is twelve (12") inches. When the dispersal field cannot be installed twelve inches below the ground surface, and meet the above separation requirements, then a supplemental treatment system will be required. D. OWTS located near public water systems shall be subject to increased setback requirements, such as OWTS located with 1200 feet of a surface water intake. E. Density and minimum lot size requirements. All new development requires a minimum lot size of one-half acre (21,780 square feet), average gross, per dwelling unit, including accessory structures, is required for all new developments, which do not have access to a public sewer as required under 19.28.040 of this chapter. The public street area adjacent to the net lot area may count towards the minimum one-half acre gross lot size for OWTS. For new development for industrial or commercial properties, the wastewater flow for each one-half acre of land may not exceed that from a single dwelling unit. When determining compliance with this criterion, a flow rate of 300 gallons per day will be considered equivalent to a single-family dwelling unit. This flow rate shall be prorated for commercial or industrial developments with lots smaller than one-half acre, or the equivalent of 20 fixture units. F. Minimum Lot Size Exemptions. 1. The minimum lot size requirements do not apply to existing properties with OWTS which were installed prior to the effective date of this chapter. 2. New development occurring upon single family residences with existing septic systems that will accommodate additional wastewater flows, caused by additional installations such as rooms, bathrooms or accessory structures. A septic certification may be required to verify the septic tank and disposal field capacity to accept additional wastewater flows. 3. Tracts, parcels, and/or commercial/industrial developments which received land use approval from the City of Rancho 23 Page 704 Cucamonga prior to August 21, 2017 are exempt from the minimum lot size requirements and shall not be less than one- half acre per this chapter for the use of septic tank subsurface disposal systems. 4. New lots, which are smaller than one-half acre, may be formed by combining through a lot merger two or more existing lots which have received land use approval prior to the effective date of the LAMP. Individually, these lots would be eligible for an exemption from the minimum lot size requirement. Developments on combined lots may also qualify for an exemption provided that the total number of units proposed for the new parcel is equal to, or less than the total number of units proposed for the existing parcel and/or when an alternative treatment system is utilized. When requesting to use an alternative treatment system, each system will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis, and will require the approval of Building and Safety Services and the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board. 19.28.160 Groundwater and Percolation Testing Requirements. A. Groundwater Testing Procedures. 1. Test borings in the area of an OWTS shall extend to a minimum of 15 feet unless refusal is reached. Deeper depths may be required depending on site-specific conditions as determined by the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Services or the project qualified professional. Site- specific conditions may include, but not be limited to; the proposed depth of the system, local geology, soil types encountered, elevation and terrain, features on site, evidence and/or knowledge of historic ground water levels in the area, and the anticipated fluctuation of the groundwater table in times of normal to above normal annual rainfall. 2. Test borings in the area of a vertical seepage pit or horizontal seepage pit system shall extend to at least 10 feet deeper than the bottom of the proposed pit(s). 3. Since groundwater does not always immediately flow into a test boring, the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Services requires a minimum of 72 hours pass before an accurate groundwater measurement is taken. The qualified professional and/or the property owner maintain full responsibility for protecting the public from any hazards related to the test borings. It is recommended that all test 24 Page 705 borings that encounter groundwater be converted to observation wells so the groundwater conditions can be monitored over time. 4. If the qualified professional does not wish to complete the test borings as observation wells, they can cover the test boring, place safeguards around the borings to prevent unauthorized access and make an appointment for the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Services staff to observe the boring at least 72 -hours after the boring has been completed. 5. During periods of below normal average rainfall, or after periods of drought where there has not yet been sufficient ground water recharge, the absence of groundwater in test borings in areas where groundwater is suspect may not mean that approval to issue a septic tank permit can be granted. It may be necessary for the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Services and the qualified professional to monitor the test borings for a sufficient period of time to determine where groundwater will rise to during normal to above normal rainfall. B. Percolation Testing Procedure. All percolation testing for dispersal systems except vertical seepage pits in the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall be conducted through the use of the following procedures. The test shall be performed by or under the direct supervision of a California registered professional engineer or geologist. Any deviation shall be authorized only after receiving written approval by the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Services. Percolation testing shall be required for all new OWTS for non-residential development and for residential development comprising more than one dwelling unit, where a percolation report has not previously been completed. A one -lot custom single family home may use the city's currently adopted California Plumbing Code, Appendix H — Private Sewage Disposal Systems, Section H 3.0 - Area of Disposal Fields and Seepage Pits, and the included Table H 2.1(2) — Design Criteria of Five Typical Soils for the design of the seepage pit or the leech field. Test Holes. A minimum of four test holes is required when percolation rates are less than 60 minutes per inch (mpi). A minimum of six test holes is required when the average percolation rate is more than 60 mpi. Additional test holes may be necessary on a site specific basis for reasons that include, but are not limited to the following: (i) Unacceptable or failed tests; (ii) Areas of the disposal field requiring defined limits for 25 Page 706 exclusion; (iii) The disposal system is located out of a concentrated area; and (iv) Soil conditions are variable or inconsistent. All test holes shall be representative of the dispersal system installation depth. If the proposed development site has any of the following characteristics, test holes must be extended below the proposed dispersal system installation depth: (i) Shallow or consolidated rock or impervious soil layers; (ii) slopes exceeding twenty-five (25%) percent; or (iii) other factors as might be determined by sound geotechnical engineering practices. 2. There shall be a minimum of ten (10) feet of soil above any imperious formation such as rock, clay, adobe, and/or water table. Fractured rock and consolidated granites will not be considered as soil. Deep testing may be required to ensure uniform conditions exist below the disposal field. 3. Depending upon the scope of grading for a project, the Planning Department may require a conceptual grading plan and Building and Safety Services may require a grading plan. If a grading plan is required it should be included with the percolation report submittal. A grading plan helps Building and Safety Services ensure testing was done at the correct depths. Where grading is expected, include the original and finished elevations in the grading plan. For details on how to complete a grading plan contact the Building and Safety Services Department. 4. Percolation testing shall be conducted by, and all accompanying reports prepared by a Qualified Professional. 5. Prior to reviewing a percolation test, Building and Safety Service may require a site evaluation during percolation testing to ensure proper system design, and evaluate site location to ensure that the system will be in compliance. For soil to be considered uniform, test results must fall with twenty-five (25%) percent of the mean percolation rate. Determining the number of percolation tests required will be based on soil conditions and project type. 6. For areas which are primarily Sandy Loam or Sandy Clay, a field design of 60 square feet per 100 gallons. 7. For areas which are primarily Clay wither considerable sand or gravel, a field design of 90 square feet per 100 gallons. 26 Page 707 8. Percolation rates in excess of 120 minutes per inch shall be deemed conclusive evidence that the soil is impermeable is not suitable for an OWTS. C. Percolation Testing Reports. All testing data and required result information shall be submitted to City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Services on forms approved by the city. A minimum of three copies is required. All reports shall be signed with an original signature and seal by the consultant who either performed or supervised the testing. All percolation testing is to be performed by a licensed civil engineer or geologist registered in the State of California. 19.28.170 Septic Tank Requirements. A. All conventional OWTS require the use of a septic tank to allow for the removal of solids in the wastewater prior to being discharged to the dispersal field. Alternative OWTS also require a septic tank unless a settling chamber is a component of the treatment unit. B. Septic Tank Requirements: 1. Septic tanks must be certified by the International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials (IAPMO). 2. The tank shall be watertight and possess two chambers. 3. Septic tanks shall be certified by the manufacturer to allow for burial without being water filled to allow for routine maintenance or to be used as a holding tank as needed. 4. Septic tanks shall be installed per the manufacturer's instructions. 5. The bottom of the excavation for the tank shall extend into native or compacted soils to eliminate potential settling issues. 6. Septic tank location must take into account maintenance and pumping requirements including vehicle access; and distance and elevation lift to pumper truck. 7. All tanks must have a capped tee or a 90 degree elbow fitting on the inlet to prevent gas exchange between the tank and the house plumbing. Inlet tees must extend at least 14 inches below the liquid level. 27 Page 708 8. Outlet tees must be uncapped and must extend at least 12 inches below the liquid level. 9. The outlet elevation shall be between 2 and 6 inches lower than the inlet elevation to ensure proper fall without a significant loss of volume. 10. Fall between the outlet of the septic tank and the dispersal field shall be continuous with a minimum fall that that ensures the outlet pipe is 4 inches higher than the top of the seepage pit system or 4 inches above the top of the leach rock or other components used in the dispersal system on a level system, or a distribution box if multiple seepage pits or leach lines are constructed. 11. Septic tanks with greater than 6 inches of cover must have risers to within 6 inches of finished grade. Risers and lids that are at or above grade must be watertight and lockable or require tools to be opened. 12. Septic tank risers must have a current IAPMO certification prior to use. Concrete risers and lids must be constructed of Type V concrete or be protected from corrosion from sewer gases. The interior diameter of the riser shall be a minimum of eighteen (18) inches. 13. Effluent filters must be IAPMO approved if they are to be installed as part of the outlet tee. 14. Septic tanks installed in areas of vehicular traffic must be certified to withstand the proposed loads or have an engineered traffic slab installed to accommodate the proposed loads. 15. Minimum tank size is 1000 gallons for residential and 750 gallons for non-residential structures. 16. Septic tanks shall be sized according to anticipated wastewater flows from the structure(s). The following standard sizes shall apply: (i) 1-3 bedroom single family dwelling (0-450 GPD) 1000 gallons; (ii) 4 bedroom single family dwelling (450-600 GPD) 1200 gallons; (iii) 5-6 bedroom single family dwelling (601-900 GPD) 1500 gallons; and (iv) Flows greater than 900 GPD must utilize the following formula to determine minimum tank sizing: 1125 gallons + (.75)(Flow in GPD). Page 709 17. The permitted plan set shall contain a note requiring the septic tank to be filled with water, without leakage, at the time of the first inspection. 19.28.180 Leach Line System Requirements. A. Leach line systems are limited to soils with percolation rates of 120 minutes per inch or less. Percolation rates in excess of 120 minutes per inch are unsuitable for the installation of an OWTS dispersal system. 1. At least four percolation test holes at each leach field location should be provided to represent soil types at the depth of the proposed leach lines. At least one deep boring should extend to a depth of at least 15 feet or to impermeable material but in no case shall there be less than 5 foot of unsaturated, permeable soil below the bottom of the leach line trench. For areas of suspected high groundwater, deep borings are recommended to be 20'-25' to help determine gradients during varying rainfall periods. 2. Backhoe excavations may be required to demonstrate uniformity of soil throughout the leach field area(s). Leach line dispersal systems are limited to slopes of 25 percent (4:1) or less. B. Soil Cover Requirements. The maximum soil cover allowed over the top of the infiltrative surface is 48 inches, measured from the top of the leach rock chamber/etc. to the ground surface. The minimum cover required over the top of the infiltrative surface is 12 inches. Soil cover requirements must also conform to those allowed by the manufacturer of any gravel-less/chamber design. C. Leach Line Dimensions. Leach lines are to be installed according to the qualified professional's specifications for location, length, width, and depth. Leach lines are to be spaced at least 10 feet apart, measured center to center. Leach lines shall be installed with a width of no less than 12 inches and no more than 36 inches. Regardless of trench width or materials used, dispersal systems using leach lines shall be designed using not less than 3 square feet of infiltrative area per linear foot of trench as the infiltrative surface. No reduction in sizing is allowed for the use of chambers. The minimum length of leach trench for a new OWTS using leach lines as the dispersal system shall be 200 feet regardless of the projected wastewater flows. A 100% reserve area shall be required for all leach line systems. Properties that previously were required to maintain areas 29 Page 710 of 200% or 300% reserve shall now have a 100% reserve area requirement in place of the previous requirement. D. Materials and Construction Considerations. Leach lines shall not be placed under impermeable surfaces. Leach lines that are later covered by impermeable surfaces may not be considered as viable for purposes of determining primary and reserve area requirements. All piping and materials used in leach line systems including gravel- less/chamber systems must have IAPMO approval and must be approved by City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Services prior to installation. Leach lines that utilize gravel shall be filled with clean, washed leach line rock to a point at least 4 inches above the top of a 4 -inch perforated pipe and shall have a minimum of 12 inches of gravel below the pipe. The rock shall be graded at 1 to 1.5 inches in size and shall be covered with straw, untreated building paper or a geotextile fabric prior to backfill to prevent the infiltration of soil into the rock. Where multiple leach lines are proposed on sloping ground, a distribution box must be used to connect the leach lines. Leach line trenches shall be installed with the trench bottom and materials used being level to within 2 inches per 100 feet. E. Leach Lines on Steep Slopes. The following requirements must be met for the installation of leach line trenches on slopes exceeding 25 percent (4:1) without necessitating the grading of terraces. 1. The maximum slope allowed for leach line trenches is 40 percent (2-1/21 slope). 2. All leach lines on steep slopes shall be installed in 5 foot deep trenches with 12 inches of leach rock below the leach pipe or with approved chambers or other gravel -less system. 3. The design of disposal systems on steep slopes requires the experience and expertise to address conditions relative to soil, slope stability, and subsurface conditions which require professional judgment and technical knowledge. Designs for steep slope systems will only be approved when submitted by a qualified professional licensed in the State of California. 4. Testing must provide data representative of the entire disposal area and demonstrate that conditions are uniform below the entire disposal area. The minimum testing required is: (i) Six percolation tests at a depth equal to the proposed trench depth; (ii) Two percolation tests five feet below the proposed trench depth; (iii) Percolation testing must show rates of 120 minutes per inch or less; and (iv) At least two soil 30 Page 711 profile borings demonstrating uniform conditions throughout the disposal area to a depth of 10 feet below the proposed trench depth. 5. Design reports must include the following: (i) Cross section(s) hillside soil profile(s); (ii) Detailed boring logs of all test holes and borings; (iii) Scaled layouts and profiled designs based on accurate topography; (iv) Any grading proposed on the site in the disposal area; (v) A slope stability report or statement from a qualified professional; (vi) Any grading, proposed to create a stable work area for trench installation, may be subject to review for conflict with Building and Safety Services Department. F. Leach Line System Length. Table 19.28.180. Leach Line System Length Requirements. LEACH LINE TRENCH LENGTH (feet) BASED ON PERCOLATION TEST RATE Perc Rate Number of Bedrooms Rate Perc Number of Bedrooms MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 200 200 240 270 280 300 31 280 350 420 480 535 595 2 200 200 240 270 280 300 32 280 355 430 480 535 595 3 200 200 240 270 280 300 33 290 360 430 490 545 605 4 200 220 260 290 300 310 34 290 360 440 490 545 605 5 200 240 290 320 320 340 35 290 365 440 500 555 615 6 200 250 300 340 350 360 36 300 370 440 500 555 615 7 210 260 310 350 370 380 37 300 370 450 500 555 615 8 210 265 320 360 390 400 38 300 375 450 510 565 625 9 220 270 320 360 400 410 39 300 380 460 510 565 625 10 220 275 330 370 410 420 40 300 380 460 520 575 635 11 220 280 340 380 420 430 41 310 385 460 520 575 635 12 230 285 340 380 430 440 42 310 390 470 530 585 645 31 Page 712 LEACH LINE TRENCH LENGTH (feet) BASED ON PERCOLATION TEST RATE Perc Rate Number of Bedrooms Rate Perc Number of Bedrooms MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 13 230 290 350 390 430 450 43 310 390 470 530 585 645 14 235 295 350 400 440 460 44 310 395 480 540 595 655 15 240 300 360 400 450 470 45 320 400 480 540 595 655 16 240 300 360 410 450 490 46 320 400 480 540 595 655 17 240 305 370 410 460 500 47 320 405 490 550 605 665 18 250 310 370 420 460 510 48 330 410 490 550 605 665 19 250 310 380 420 470 520 49 330 410 500 560 615 675 20 250 315 380 430 470 520 50 330 415 500 560 615 675 21 260 320 380 430 480 530 51 340 420 500 560 615 675 22 260 320 390 440 480 530 52 340 420 510 570 625 685 23 260 325 390 440 490 550 53 340 425 510 580 635 695 24 260 330 400 450 500 560 54 340 430 520 580 635 695 25 260 330 400 450 500 560 55 340 430 520 580 635 695 26 270 335 400 450 510 570 56 350 435 520 590 645 705 27 270 340 410 460 515 575 57 350 440 530 590 645 705 28 270 340 410 460 515 575 58 350 440 530 600 655 715 29 270 345 420 470 525 585 59 350 445 540 600 655 715 30 280 350 420 470 525 585 60 360 450 540 610 665 725 32 Page 713 LEACH LINE TRENCH LENGTH BASED ON PERCOLATION TEST RATE Perc Rate Number of Bedrooms Rate Perc Number of Bedrooms MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 61 370 460 550 620 690 740 91 680 770 860 930 980 1020 62 380 470 560 630 680 720 92 695 785 875 945 995 1035 63 390 480 570 640 690 730 93 710 800 890 960 1010 1050 64 400 490 580 650 700 740 94 725 815 905 975 1025 1065 65 420 500 580 660 710 750 95 740 830 920 990 1040 1080 66 420 510 600 670 720 760 96 755 845 935 1005 1055 1095 67 430 520 610 680 730 770 97 770 860 950 1020 1070 1110 68 440 530 620 690 740 780 98 785 875 965 1035 1085 1125 69 450 540 630 700 750 790 99 800 890 980 1050 1100 1140 70 460 550 640 710 760 800 100 815 905 995 1065 1115 1155 71 470 560 650 720 770 810 101 830 920 1010 1080 1130 1170 72 480 570 660 730 780 820 102 845 935 1025 1095 1145 1185 73 490 580 670 740 790 830 103 860 950 1040 1110 1160 1200 74 500 590 680 750 800 840 104 875 965 1055 1125 1175 1215 75 510 600 690 760 810 850 105 890 980 1070 1140 1190 1230 76 520 610 700 770 820 860 106 905 995 1085 1155 1205 1245 77 530 620 710 780 830 870 107 920 1010 1100 1170 1220 1260 78 540 630 720 790 840 880 108 935 1025 1115 1185 1230 1270 79 550 640 730 800 850 890 109 950 1040 1130 1200 1250 1290 80 560 650 740 810 860 900 110 965 1055 1145 1215 1265 1305 81 570 660 750 820 870 910 111 980 1070 1160 1230 1280 1320 82 580 670 760 830 880 920 112 995 1085 1175 1245 1295 1335 83 590 680 770 840 890 930 113 1010 1100 1190 1260 1310 1350 33 Page 714 LEACH LINE TRENCH LENGTH BASED ON PERCOLATION TEST RATE Perc Rate Number of Bedrooms Rate Perc Number of Bedrooms MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 84 600 690 780 850 900 940 114 1025 1115 1205 1275 1325 1365 85 610 700 790 860 910 950 115 1040 1130 1220 1290 1340 1380 86 620 710 800 870 920 960 116 1055 1145 1235 1305 1355 1395 87 630 720 810 880 930 970 117 1070 1160 1250 1320 1370 1410 88 640 730 820 890 940 980 118 1085 1175 1265 1335 1385 1425 89 650 740 830 900 950 990 119 1100 1190 1280 1350 1390 1440 90 665 755 845 915 965 1005 120 1120 1210 1300 1370 1420 1460 Note: MPI means minutes per inch. Conversion Factor example. (1 inch of drop/ # Perc Rate) x 60 minutes per hour = 6 inches/hour. 19.28.190 Vertical Seepage Pit System Requirements. A. Permitted Locations. 1. Any lot previously approved for the use of a vertical seepage pit must meet all current requirements found in this section to be considered for development based on the use of a vertical seepage pit. A new custom single family house may use the sizing criteria for existing lots. 2. New lots containing two or more OWTS units, upon the recommendation and design by a qualified professional soils engineer. B. Percolation Test Procedures for Vertical Seepage Pit Systems. All vertical seepage pits for new construction, or for 2 or more lots, will require percolation testing by a qualified professional certified to perform percolation tests in City of Rancho Cucamonga. A waiver of testing can be considered where adequate information exists as to soil types, depth and permeability. Percolation testing for vertical seepage pits shall be completed per the following guidelines: 1. A 12 to 48 inch diameter test hole shall be excavated to a depth of at least 10 feet deeper than the proposed installation depth. 34 Page 715 2. A minimum 10 foot separation between the bottom of the vertical seepage pit and the anticipated high groundwater level is required. 3. Boring logs shall be recorded and included with all test reports indicating soil strata depths and types and visual classification according to the unified soil classification system along with any groundwater encountered. 4. The overdrill must be checked for the presence of groundwater a minimum of 24 hours after the completion of the test boring to allow time for groundwater to stabilize in the hole. 5. After the groundwater reading is recorded, the test hole shall be backfilled to a depth 10 feet above the bottom of the test hole or the groundwater level whichever is shallower. 6. The pit shall be filled with water to the cap depth and a continuous pre-soak shall be maintained at the proposed cap level for a minimum 8 -hour period. In highly permeable soils when cap levels cannot be maintained during pre-soak, the test shall be conducted at a depth no higher than the pre-soak level which was attained. Document the pre-soak attempt with gallons of water used. In no case shall less than 5,000 gallons of water be used within a 1 hour period in the attempted pre- soak when the cap level cannot be maintained. The depth of the test shall be noted on the boring log and in no case shall the sidewall of permeable soil below the cap level be less than ten foot. 7. Upon completion of the pre-soak period, fill the pit to cap level and determine uniformity of soil by measuring the falling head. Distance to the water level shall be measured at 15 minute intervals, or more frequently if needed, until the drop stops or the pit empties. A graph of the drop in water level shall be attached to all proposals submitted by the qualified professional. If non-uniform rates persist, the soil will not be considered uniform and the tests discontinued as they will not be approved by City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Services. 8. If the procedure in Item no. 4 demonstrates uniform soil, proceed with a two-hour static head or falling head capacity test: (i) Static Head — the pit shall be filled with water to the cap depth and the water column shall be maintained at that level for two hours. The amount of water added to maintain 35 Page 716 this level must be documented. The 24-hour capacity is determined by multiplying by 12. Adjustment to a four foot diameter pit is made if a lesser size test hole is used; (ii) Falling Head — the pit shall be filled with water to the cap depth and the column of water shall be allowed to drop for a two hour period. The distance dropped shall be measured and the amount of water absorbed determined. This amount is multiplied by 12 to determine the 24-hour capacity. Adjustment to a four foot diameter pit is made if a lesser size test hole is used. 9. The minimum capacity for a new OWTS using vertical seepage pits as the dispersal system shall be 5 times the volume of the required septic tank or 5000 gallons per day whichever is greater. All individual vertical seepage pit shall have a minimum capacity of 1,667 gallons per day. 10. Each pit must meet these minimum criteria to be acceptable. The qualified professional may include safety factors as he feels the situation warrants. 11. It shall be the responsibility of the qualified professional to maintain all test holes or pits in a safe manner prior to backfill or capping to prevent a hazard or accident. C. Dimensions and Construction Requirements. 1. Vertical seepage pits shall be installed according to the qualified profession's specifications for location, depth, and cap depth. 2. The pit excavation shall be five (5), six (6) or seven (7) feet in diameter. Pit excavations greater than 7 -feet in diameter require prior approval by the Building Official. 3. The sidewall depth below the inlet shall not be less than 14 feet. 4. The minimum depth to the top of the infiltrative surface allowed is 2 feet. This depth is also known as the cap depth. There is no maximum cap depth but documentation must be provided to justify any cap depth greater than 5 feet. 5. The maximum slope allowed for the use of vertical seepage pits is 40 percent (2-1/2:1 slope). Slopes that exceed 25% (4:1) will require additional engineering and design detail as required to address the risk of effluent surfacing on the slope recognizable as sewage as well as slope stability issues. 36 Page 717 Slopes that exceed 25% (4:1) will, in most cases, require a terrace design or grading to allow for drilling access. Any grading shall be in accordance with any permit requirements for brushing, clearing, and grading from any other agency. 6. All pits must be filled with clean washed leach line rock to the cap depth. The rock shall be graded at 1 to 1.5 inches in size and shall be covered with straw, untreated building paper or a geotextile fabric prior to backfill to prevent the infiltration of soil into the rock. 7. A 4 inch Schedule 40 pipe shall be installed from the ground surface to the bottom of each seepage pit for clean-out, pumping and verification of the total pit depth. The pipe shall have perforations from the cap depth to the bottom of the pit and be of solid construction from the cap depth to the ground surface. A screw fit cap must be placed on top of the riser to allow access. 8. Where more than one vertical seepage pit is proposed for the primary or reserve system, a distribution box must be used to connect the pits. Chaining or lining the seepage pits together such that the overflow from an upstream pit flows to a downstream pit shall not be permitted. D. Design Criteria for Replacement of Existing Private Sewage Disposal Systems. Table 19.28.190.D Design Criteria for Replacement of Existing Private Sewage Disposal Systems. 37 Page 718 Minimum 3 Ft A.P.* @ 5 Ft A.P.* @ 7 Ft A.P.* @ Size of Seepage Pit Septic p Disposal 12" 24" 36" with Tank Leach Wide Bottom Wide Bottom Wide Bottom Min. 4Ft. —Max. 6Ft. Capacity Field Below Below Below Dia. Liner. (Gallons) (Area Leach Line Leach Line Leach Line (Diameter x Depth) Req'd) (A.P. x (A.P. x (A.P. x (See notes: 3, 4, 5 & 6) Required Length) Length) Length) Field Design at 60 Square Feet / 100 gallons (See Pit design at 60 Square notes: 1, 2, 3 & 6) Feet/ 100 gallons 1,000 600 (2) 3'x 100' (4) 5'x 55' (2) 7' x 100' or 5'x 39' 6' x 32'7' x 28' (1)7'x200' 1,200 720 (3)3'x80' (4)5'x66' (4)7'x52' 5'x46' 6'x38'7'x33' 37 Page 718 1,500 900 (3) Tx 100' (3) 5'x 82' (3) 7' x 70' 5'x58' 6' x 48' 7' x 41' 1 Field Design at 90 Square Feet / 100 gallons (See notes: 1, 2, 3 & 6) Pit design at 90 Square Feet/ 100 gallons 1,000 900 (3)3'x100' (2)5'x100' (3)7'x64' 5'x58' 6' x 48' 7' x 41' 1,200 1,080 (4) Tx 90' (3) 5'x 72' (3)7'x78' 5'x69' 6' x 58' 7' x 50' 1,500 1,350 (5)Tx90' (3)5'x90' (2)7'x100' 5'x86' 6'x72'7'x62' 31 Notes: *Absorption Perimeter 1. Other variations may be allowed to width and depth so as to achieve the required leach area. Chapter 8. 2. Trenches shall not have less than 600 sq. ft of infiltrative area. Chapter 8. 3. All deviations from this handout will require a percolation test with a designed septic system by a licensed Civil Engineer. 4. Depth of the seepage pit shall be measured from the bottom of the pit to the invert of the distribution pipe. Chapter 9. 5. Multiple seepage pits may be used. If this is the case, the required depth from the table above can be divided equally among the numbers of seepage pits. In no cases the depth of seepage pits can be less than the "minimum depth". Chapter 9. E. Design Criteria for New Private Sewage Disposal Systems. 1. Five -Foot Diameter Pits: SEEPAGE PIT DEPTH (feet) BASED ON PERCOLATION TEST RATE Perc Rate Number of Bedrooms Rate Perc Number of Bedrooms MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 17 17 17 17 18 19 31 18 22 27 31 34 38 2 17 17 17 17 18 19 32 18 23 27 31 34 38 3 17 17 17 17 18 19 33 18 23 27 31 35 39 4 17 17 17 18 19 20 34 18 23 28 31 35 39 5 17 17 18 20 20 22 35 18 23 28 32 35 39 Page 719 SEEPAGE PIT DEPTH (feet) BASED ON PERCOLATION TEST RATE Perc Rate Number of Bedrooms Rate Perc Rate Perc Number of Bedrooms MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 MPI MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 6 17 17 19 22 22 23 91 36 19 24 28 32 35 39 7 17 17 20 22 24 24 92 37 19 24 29 32 35 39 8 17 17 20 23 25 25 93 38 19 24 29 32 36 40 9 17 17 20 23 25 26 94 39 19 24 29 32 36 40 10 17 18 21 24 26 27 95 40 19 24 29 33 37 40 11 17 18 22 24 27 27 96 41 20 25 29 33 37 40 12 17 18 22 24 27 28 97 42 20 25 30 34 37 41 13 17 18 22 25 27 29 43 20 25 30 34 37 41 14 17 19 22 25 28 29 44 20 25 31 34 38 42 15 17 19 23 25 29 30 45 20 25 31 34 38 42 16 17 19 23 26 29 31 46 20 25 31 34 38 42 17 17 19 24 26 29 32 47 20 26 31 35 39 42 18 17 20 24 27 29 32 48 21 26 31 35 39 42 19 17 20 24 27 30 33 49 21 26 32 36 39 43 20 17 20 24 27 30 33 50 21 26 32 36 39 43 21 17 20 24 27 31 34 51 22 27 32 36 39 43 22 17 20 25 28 31 34 52 22 27 32 36 40 44 23 17 21 25 28 31 35 53 22 27 32 37 40 44 24 17 21 25 29 32 36 54 22 27 33 37 40 44 25 17 21 25 29 32 36 55 22 27 33 37 40 44 26 17 21 25 29 32 36 56 22 28 33 38 41 45 27 17 22 26 29 33 37 57 22 28 34 38 41 45 28 17 22 26 29 33 37 58 22 28 34 38 1 42 46 29 17 22 27 30 33 37 59 22 28 34 38 42 46 30 18 22 27 30 33 37 60 23 29 34 39 42 46 SEEPAGE PIT DEPTH (feet) BASED ON PERCOLATION TEST RATE Perc Rate Number of Bedrooms Rate Perc Number of Bedrooms MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 61 24 29 35 39 44 47 91 43 49 55 59 62 65 62 24 30 36 40 43 46 92 44 50 56 60 63 66 63 25 31 36 41 44 46 93 45 51 57 61 64 67 64 25 31 37 41 45 47 94 1 46 52 1 58 62 1 65 68 65 27 32 37 42 45 48 95 47 53 59 63 66 69 66 27 32 38 43 46 48 96 48 54 60 64 67 70 67 27 33 39 43 46 49 97 49 55 61 65 68 71 39 Page 720 SEEPAGE PIT DEPTH (feet) BASED ON PERCOLATION TEST RATE Perc Rate Number of Bedrooms Rate Perc Rate Perc Number of Bedrooms MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 68 28 34 39 44 47 50 19 98 50 56 61 66 69 72 69 29 34 40 45 48 50 23 99 51 57 62 67 70 73 70 29 35 41 45 48 51 100 52 58 63 68 71 74 71 30 36 41 46 49 52 101 53 59 64 69 72 75 72 31 36 42 46 50 52 102 54 60 65 70 73 75 73 31 37 43 47 50 53 103 55 61 66 71 74 76 74 32 38 43 48 51 54 104 56 61 67 72 75 77 75 32 38 44 48 52 54 105 57 62 68 73 76 78 76 33 39 45 49 52 55 106 58 63 69 74 77 79 77 34 39 45 50 53 55 107 59 64 70 75 78 80 78 34 40 46 50 54 56 108 60 65 71 75 78 81 79 35 41 46 51 54 57 109 61 66 72 76 80 82 80 36 41 47 52 55 57 110 61 67 73 77 81 83 81 36 42 48 52 55 58 111 62 68 74 78 82 84 82 37 43 48 53 56 59 112 63 69 75 79 82 85 83 38 43 49 54 57 59 113 64 70 76 80 83 86 84 38 44 50 54 57 60 114 65 71 77 81 84 87 85 39 45 50 55 58 61 115 66 72 78 82 85 88 86 39 45 51 55 59 61 116 67 73 79 83 86 89 87 40 46 52 56 59 62 117 68 74 80 84 87 90 88 41 46 52 57 60 62 118 69 75 81 85 88 91 89 41 47 53 57 61 63 119 70 76 82 86 89 92 90 42 48 54 58 61 64 120 71 77 r83 87 90 93 Where: mpi = minutes per inch Conversion Factor: Example: (1 inch of drop / X MPI) x 60 minutes per hour = 6 inches/hour 2. Six -Foot Diameter Pits: SEEPAGE PIT DEPTH (feet) BASED ON PERCOLATION TEST RATE Perc Rate Number of Bedrooms Rate Perc Number of Bedrooms MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 17 17 17 17 17 17 31 17 19 22 25 28 32 2 17 17 17 17 17 17 32 17 19 23 25 28 32 Page 721 SEEPAGE PIT DEPTH (feet) BASED ON PERCOLATION TEST RATE Perc Rate Number of Bedrooms Rate Perc Rate Perc Number of Bedrooms MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 MPI MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 3 17 17 17 17 17 17 91 33 17 19 23 26 29 32 4 17 17 17 17 17 17 92 34 17 19 23 26 29 32 5 17 17 17 17 17 18 93 35 17 19 23 27 29 33 6 17 17 17 18 19 19 94 36 17 20 23 27 29 33 7 17 17 17 19 20 20 37 17 20 24 27 29 33 8 17 17 17 19 21 21 38 17 20 24 27 30 33 9 17 17 17 19 21 22 39 17 20 24 27 30 33 10 17 17 18 20 22 22 40 17 20 24 28 31 34 11 17 17 18 20 22 23 41 17 20 24 28 31 34 12 17 17 18 20 23 23 42 17 21 25 28 31 34 13 17 17 19 21 23 24 43 17 21 25 28 31 34 14 17 17 19 21 23 24 44 17 21 25 29 32 35 15 17 17 19 21 24 25 45 17 21 25 29 32 35 16 17 17 19 22 24 26 46 17 21 25 29 32 35 17 17 17 20 22 24 27 47 17 21 26 29 32 35 18 17 17 20 22 24 27 48 18 22 26 29 32 35 19 17 17 20 22 25 28 49 18 22 27 30 33 36 20 17 17 20 23 25 28 50 18 22 27 30 33 36 21 17 17 20 23 25 28 51 18 22 27 30 33 36 22 17 17 21 23 25 28 52 18 22 27 30 33 36 23 17 17 21 23 26 29 53 18 23 27 31 34 37 24 17 18 21 24 27 30 54 18 23 28 31 34 37 25 17 18 21 24 27 30 55 18 23 28 31 34 37 26 17 18 21 24 27 30 56 19 23 28 31 34 37 27 17 18 22 24 27 31 57 19 23 28 31 34 37 28 17 18 22 24 27 31 58 19 23 28 32 35 38 29 17 18 22 25 28 31 59 19 24 29 32 35 38 30 17 19 22 25 28 31 60 19 24 29 32 35 38 SEEPAGE PIT DEPTH (feet) BASED ON PERCOLATION TEST RATE Perc Rate Number of Bedrooms Rate Perc Number of Bedrooms MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 61 20 24 29 33 37 39 91 36 41 46 49 52 54 62 20 25 30 33 36 38 92 37 42 46 50 53 55 63 21 25 30 34 37 39 93 38 42 47 51 54 56 64 21 26 31 35 37 39 94 1 38 1 43 1 48 1 52 1 54 1 57 41 Page 722 SEEPAGE PIT DEPTH (feet) BASED ON PERCOLATION TEST RATE Perc Rate Number of Bedrooms Rate Perc Number of Bedrooms MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 MPI 1 MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 65 22 27 31 35 38 40 17 95 39 44 49 53 55 57 66 22 27 32 36 38 40 20 96 40 45 50 53 56 58 67 23 28 32 36 39 41 22 97 41 46 50 54 57 59 68 23 28 33 37 39 41 1 25 98 42 46 51 55 58 60 69 24 29 33 37 40 42 99 42 47 52 56 58 61 70 24 29 34 38 40 42 100 43 48 53 57 59 61 71 25 30 35 38 41 43 101 44 49 54 57 60 62 72 25 30 35 39 41 44 102 45 50 54 58 61 63 73 26 31 36 39 42 44 103 46 50 55 59 62 64 74 27 31 36 40 42 45 104 46 51 56 60 62 64 75 27 32 37 40 43 45 105 47 52 57 61 63 65 76 28 32 37 41 44 46 106 48 53 58 61 64 66 77 28 33 38 41 44 46 107 49 54 58 62 65 67 78 29 33 38 42 45 47 108 50 54 59 63 65 67 79 29 34 39 42 45 47 109 50 55 60 64 66 68 80 30 35 39 43 46 48 110 51 56 61 64 67 69 81 30 35 40 44 46 48 111 52 57 62 65 68 70 82 31 36 40 44 47 49 112 53 58 62 66 69 71 83 31 36 41 45 47 49 113 54 58 63 67 70 72 84 32 37 41 45 48 50 114 54 59 64 68 70 72 85 32 37 42 46 48 50 115 55 60 65 68 71 73 86 33 38 42 46 49 51 116 56 61 66 69 72 74 87 33 38 43 47 49 51 117 57 62 66 70 73 75 88 34 39 44 47 50 52 118 58 62 67 71 74 76 89 35 39 44 48 50 53 119 58 63 68 72 74 76 90 35 40 45 49 51 53 120 59 64 69 73 75 77 Seven -Foot Diameter Pits: SEEPAGE PIT DEPTH (feet) BASED ON PERCOLATION TEST RATE Perc Rate Number of Bedrooms Rate Perc Number of Bedrooms MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 17 17 17 17 17 17 31 17 17 19 22 24 27 2 17 17 17 17 17 17 32 17 17 20 22 24 27 3 17 17 17 17 17 17 33 17 17 20 22 25 28 4 17 1 17 1 17 1 17 1 17 1 17 34 1 17 1 17 1 20 1 22 1 25 1 28 W Page 723 SEEPAGE PIT DEPTH (feet) BASED ON PERCOLATION TEST RATE Perc Rate Number of Bedrooms Rate Perc Number of Bedrooms MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 5 17 17 17 17 17 17 35 17 17 20 23 25 28 6 17 17 17 17 17 17 36 17 17 20 23 25 28 7 17 17 17 17 17 17 37 17 17 20 23 25 28 8 17 17 17 17 18 18 1 38 17 17 20 23 26 28 9 17 17 17 17 18 19 39 17 17 21 23 26 28 10 17 17 17 17 19 19 40 17 17 21 24 26 29 11 17 17 17 17 19 20 41 17 18 21 24 26 29 12 17 17 17 17 20 20 42 17 18 21 24 27 29 13 17 17 17 18 20 20 43 17 18 21 24 27 29 14 17 17 17 18 20 21 44 17 18 22 25 27 30 15 17 17 17 18 20 21 45 17 18 22 25 27 30 16 17 17 17 19 20 22 46 17 18 22 25 27 30 17 17 17 17 19 21 23 47 17 18 22 25 28 30 18 17 17 17 19 21 23 48 17 19 22 25 28 30 19 17 17 17 19 21 24 49 17 19 23 25 28 31 20 17 17 17 20 21 24 50 17 19 23 25 28 31 21 17 17 17 20 22 24 51 17 19 23 25 28 31 22 17 17 18 20 22 24 52 17 19 23 26 28 31 23 17 17 18 20 22 25 53 17 19 23 26 29 32 24 17 17 18 20 23 25 54 17 20 24 26 29 32 25 17 17 18 20 23 25 55 17 20 24 26 29 32 26 17 17 18 20 23 26 56 17 20 24 27 29 32 27 17 17 19 21 23 26 57 17 20 24 27 29 32 28 17 17 19 21 23 26 58 17 20 24 27 30 33 29 17 17 19 21 24 27 59 17 20 25 27 30 33 30 17 17 19 21 24 27 60 17 20 25 28 30 33 SEEPAGE PIT DEPTH (feet) BASED ON PERCOLATION TEST RATE Perc Rate Number of Bedrooms Rate Perc Number of Bedrooms MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 61 17 21 25 28 31 34 91 31 35 39 42 45 46 62 17 21 25 29 31 33 92 32 36 40 43 45 47 63 18 22 26 29 31 33 93 32 36 40 44 46 48 64 1 18 1 22 1 26 1 30 1 32 1 34 1 1 94 1 33 1 37 1 41 1 44 1 47 1 48 65 19 23 26 30 32 34 95 34 38 42 45 47 49 66 19 23 27 30 33 35 96 34 38 43 46 48 50 43 Page 724 SEEPAGE PIT DEPTH (feet) BASED ON PERCOLATION TEST RATE Perc Rate Number of Bedrooms Rate Perc Number of Bedrooms MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 67 20 24 28 31 33 35 97 35 39 43 46 49 51 68 20 24 28 31 34 35 98 36 40 44 47 49 51 69 20 25 29 32 34 36 99 36 40 45 48 50 52 70 21 25 29 32 35 36 100 37 41 45 48 51 53 71 21 25 30 33 35 37 101 38 42 46 49 51 53 72 22 26 30 33 35 37 102 38 43 47 50 52 54 73 22 26 30 34 36 38 103 39 43 47 51 53 55 74 23 27 31 34 36 38 104 40 44 48 51 53 55 75 23 27 31 35 37 39 105 40 45 49 52 54 56 76 24 28 32 35 37 39 106 41 45 49 53 55 57 77 24 28 32 35 38 40 107 42 46 50 53 56 57 78 25 29 33 36 38 40 108 43 47 51 54 56 58 79 25 29 33 36 39 40 109 43 47 51 55 57 59 80 25 30 34 37 39 41 110 44 48 52 55 58 59 81 26 30 34 37 40 41 111 45 49 53 56 58 60 82 26 30 35 38 40 42 112 45 49 53 57 59 61 83 27 31 35 38 40 42 113 46 50 54 57 60 61 84 27 31 35 39 41 43 114 47 51 55 58 60 62 85 28 32 36 39 41 43 115 47 51 56 59 61 63 86 28 32 36 40 42 44 116 48 52 56 59 62 63 87 29 33 37 40 42 44 117 49 53 57 60 62 64 88 29 33 37 40 43 45 118 49 53 58 61 63 65 89 30 34 38 41 43 45 119 50 54 58 61 63 66 90 30 34 38 42 44 46 120 51 55 1 59 1 62 65 66 19.28.200 Horizontal Seepage Pit Systems. The use of the horizontal seepage pit systems is permitted only where adequate area does not exist for a leach line system. All horizontal seepage pit systems shall comply with the design and construction requirements provided in this section. A. Percolation Test Procedures for Horizontal Seepage Pit Systems. All percolation tests shall be performed in accordance with the test procedures found in 19.28.160 (Groundwater and Percolation Testing Requirements). In addition to the requirements of Section 19.28.160, percolation tests for horizontal seepage pits must also comply with the following additional requirements: Page 725 1. The average percolation rates shall not exceed 30 minutes per inch in any portion of the horizontal seepage pit. Individual rates exceeding 30 minutes per inch may be considered with additional soil testing. 2. At least 4 percolation test holes at each pit location should be provided to represent soil types within the infiltrative surface area of the seepage pit. This profile should represent the entire sidewall depth of the pit. 3. At least 1 deep boring should extend to a depth of at least 10 feet below the bottom of the seepage pit, or to impermeable material. In no case shall less than 5 feet of unsaturated permeable soil exist below the bottom of the seepage pit. 4. Backhoe excavations may be required to demonstrate uniformity of soil throughout the seepage pit. This would be necessary when the pit is proposed in an area of variable soil conditions. 5. Any percolation tests for horizontal seepage pits, which were approved based on testing prior to the effective date of this section, will require additional percolation testing unless the previous testing meets current requirements. B. Dimensions and Construction Requirements. 1. Horizontal seepage pits are to be installed according to the qualified professional's specifications for location, length, width, and depth. 2. Horizontal seepage pits must be spaced 20 feet apart measured edge to edge. 3. Primary and reserve horizontal seepage pits cannot be combined in one common pit. 4. The pit excavation must be at least 4 feet in width, but not greater than 6 feet in width. 5. The top of the infiltrative surface shall be at least 2 feet below the natural grade but no more than 5 feet. This depth is also known as the cap depth. Additional soil can be placed over the top of the installed horizontal seepage pit at the discretion of the qualified professional. 6. The sidewall depth below the cap shall be at least 6 feet but cannot exceed 7 feet. 45 Page 726 7. The pit excavations may arc or bend under the following conditions: (i) The maximum deflection cannot exceed a total of 45 degrees in any direction without increasing the pit length to compensate for loss of sidewall area; (ii) Bends or arcs totaling greater than 45 degrees may be accepted on a case- by-case basis. A correction factor will be required, increasing the total length, due to sidewall loss; and (iii) U-shaped and H-shaped bends will not be accepted. 8. The maximum slope for the use of horizontal seepage pits is 25% (4:1). Exceptions to this slope limit may be considered up to 50% (2:1), on a case-by-case basis, where the soil and slope are uniform, extending 100 feet beyond the seepage pit. Additional testing, and design detail shall be required to address the risk of effluent surfacing on the slope recognizable as sewage as well as slope stability issues. Slopes that exceed 25% (4:1) will, in most cases, require a terrace design. Any grading to create terraces should be in accordance with any permit requirements for brushing, clearing, and grading from any other agency. 9. The use of concrete pit liners is allowed. If used, the concrete pit liners shall meet the testing standards established by the International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials (IAPMO). 10. All pits must be filled with clean leach line rock to the cap depth of the horizontal pit liner. The rock should be graded at 1 to 1.5 inches in size and shall be covered with straw, untreated building paper or a geotextile fabric prior to backfill to prevent the infiltration of soil into the rock. 11. A manifold system constructed of 4 inch loop of Schedule 40 perforated pipe shall be installed in the pit to allow for distribution of the effluent throughout the entire pit. The manifold shall be placed 1 foot from the sidewall of the horizontal seepage pit and shall run the length and width of the pit in a rectangular pattern. 12. Where more than one horizontal seepage pit is proposed for the primary or reserve system, a distribution box must be used to connect the pits. 13. A hybrid system combining a horizontal seepage pit for the primary or reserve design, and leach lines for the other system is allowed. However, a combination of the two types of systems, used for a single primary or reserve design, will not Page 727 be considered. The system design identified as the most difficult installation shall be installed as the primary system. This is to be based on access, grading, or other obstacles to install the system once the house is constructed. 14. The California Occupational Health and Safety Act (COHSA) requires shoring for excavations exceeding 5 feet when persons will be working in them. All work done installing horizontal seepage pits must comply with COHSA for the purpose of construction and inspection. C. Horizontal Seepage Pit Sizing Calculations. The calculations for sizing a horizontal seepage pit are done to provide an equivalent amount of sidewall area in the seepage pit as found in a standard 3 foot deep leach line trench using the same percolation rate. Seepage Pit Length = (3LL — 2wd)/ 2d Where: 3 = sq. ft. of absorptive sidewall area per lineal foot of 3 foot deep leach line trench LL = leach line length as a function of percolation rate w = seepage pit width d = seepage pit sidewall depth below cap 19.28.210 Alternative onsite wastewater treatment systems; Use of alternative systems. Alternative onsite wastewater treatment systems and sewage holding tanks may only be used with prior approval of the Director of Building and Safety Services prior to submittal of plans for permitting purposes. Owners of alternative treatment systems located within the City must: A. Maintain an operating permit; B. Ensure the alternative treatment system is inspected annually; and C. Submit quarterly water samples during the first year of use. 19.28.220 Alternate onsite wastewater treatment systems siting and operational requirements; Variances permissible. A. Property owners may apply to Building and Safety Services to establish alternative OWTS siting and operational requirements where it is determined by Building and Safety Services that 47 Page 728 alternative requirements will provide equivalent level of environmental protection. B. Variances will not be granted in the following circumstances: Where the proposed OWTS presents a substantial likelihood of discharging sewage, impure waters, or any matter or substance offensive, injurious, or dangerous to health so as to cause any of the following to occur: Sewage, impure waters, or any matter or substance offensive, injurious, or dangerous to health to empty, flow, seep, or drain onto the surface of any land. Sewage, impure waters, or any matter or substance offensive, injurious, or dangerous to health to empty, flow, seep, drain into, or affect any well, spring, stream, river, lake, or other waters. iii. Result in any condition which is unsafe, dangerous, or creates a nuisance. 2. Above surface discharge. Variances will not be granted for any OWTS which utilizes any form of effluent disposal discharging on, or above, the post installation ground surface; this includes, but is not limited to sprinklers, exposed drip lines, free -surface wetlands, and ponds. 3. Sewer availability. Variances will not be granted for any OWTS where there is a public sewer available. Building and Safety Services Department may require a "Will or Will Not Serve" letter Cucamonga Valley Water District with each new or replacement OWTS proposal to evaluate the proximity and availability of community systems to the proposed OWTS site. This will ensure septic systems are only installed in areas where a sewer is unavailable. The "Will or Will Not Serve" letter must include the following: (i) Parcel number for the property where the OWTS is being proposed; (ii) Distance to the nearest available sewer line; and (iii) Whether or not the sewering entity will provide service to the parcel. The "Will or Will Not Serve" letter must be completed and signed by the appropriate official representing the sewering entity and be filed with the Building and Safety Services Department prior to submittal of the percolation report/plot plan, or upon request once the percolation report/plot plan has been submitted. 4. Sewer Requirement. Connection to a public sewer system is required within established sewer service districts and outside Page 729 such districts when required by the RWQCB. Developments must connect to a sewer system when the nearest property line is within 200 feet of a sewer line. This requirement will be increased by 100 feet for each dwelling unit within the development. 5. Ground Slope. Variances will not be granted for slopes greater than a 30% incline without a slope stability report approved by a Qualified Professional. Refer to Natural Ground Slope for more information regarding natural ground slope requirements. 6. Leaching Areas. As referenced in the current adopted California Plumbing Code, Appendix H —Private Sewage Disposal Systems — Section H 301.1 Leaching Chambers that comply with IAPMO PS 63 and bundled expanded polystyrene synthetic aggregate units that comply with IAPMO IGC 276 shall be sized using the required area calculated using Table H 201.1(3) with a 0.70 multiplier. 7. Supplemental Treatment. OWTS utilizing supplemental treatment require periodic monitoring or inspections. No variances will be granted for supplemental treatments that are unable to meet this requirement. 8. Depth to Groundwater. No variance will be granted for OWTS with a depth from the bottom of the dispersal system to groundwater less than 5 feet. The exception to this will be for seepage pits which shall have a separation no less than 10 feet. 9. Recreational Vehicle (RV) Holding Tanks. No variances will be granted for OWTS dedicated to receiving significant amounts of wastes, which are dumped from RV holding tanks. 10. Class V Injection Wells. United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) requirements apply to underground injections control systems for OWTS. Subsurface disposal systems including leach fields and seepage pits shall comply with USEPA Underground Injection Control requirements when classified as a Class V injection well. Subsurface disposal systems with at least one of the following characteristics are classified as Class V wells: (i) The system has the capacity to serve 20 or more persons per day; (ii) The system receives wastewater other than domestic wastewater such as that generated by manufacturing, chemical processing, industrial fluid disposal, automotive Page 730 repair, or recycling; or (iii) The system receives sewage containing biological agents (such as wastewater from recreational vehicles or portable toilets). Disposal systems that are classified as Class V wells must be registered with USEPA. 19.28.230 Sewer wells; cesspools; seepage pits. Except those permitted pursuant to a valid OWTS permit issued in conformance with the requirements of this chapter, all sewer wells, cesspools, seepage pits, and similar excavations are hereby declared a public nuisance and are prohibited. 19.28.240 Holding tanks. A. All holding tanks are hereby declared a public nuisance and are prohibited. Exception to this prohibition may be granted by the Director of Building and Safety Services: 1. If it is necessary to use a holding tank to abate a nuisance or health hazard caused by a failing OWTS; or 2. For a publicly -owned nonresidential facility necessary for the public health, safety or welfare, where installation of an OWTS is not feasible and a holding tank is determined by the Director of Building and Safety Services to provide the safest and most acceptable method of sewage disposal. B. Where exceptions are granted and holding tank(s) approved, an operating permit issued by the director will be required, which will provide for approval of the tank pumper, maintenance schedule, tank/sewage level monitoring, and reporting requirements. 19.28.250 OWTS failures; Corrective actions required. A. All OWTS failures resulting in effluent surfacing, wastewater surface discharge, or wastewater back-up into plumbing fixtures, shall be reported immediately to Building and Safety Services, upon discovery. B. Building and Safety Services or other designated City departments will complete an investigation within 24 hours to determine the validity of the complaint or other notification of a failing OWTS. C. Any OWTS that is found to be failing shall have a notice of violation issued to the property owner requiring action to eliminate the immediate health hazard through pumping of the septic tank by a licensed sewage hauler or elimination of wastewater flows to the 50 Page 731 failing OWTS. The notice of violation will also require a repair to be completed to the OWTS as needed within a reasonable time frame. D. The proposed repair shall be evaluated by Building and Safety Services to ensure it meets the minimum design requirements of this chapter or is in substantial conformance to the greatest extent practicable. E. Groundwater separation requirements to the bottom of the dispersal system and the highest anticipated groundwater level for repairs shall be as follows: (i) 5 foot for conventional OWTS; (ii) 2 foot for alternative OWTS with supplemental treatment; and (iii) Less than 2 foot separation cannot be allowed through this LAMP and will require a waste discharge permit through the RWQCB. F. The repair shall be completed under permit and inspection by Building and Safety Services. G. Failure to complete the required corrective action within the time frames given will result in additional enforcement action which may include condemnation of the structure for immediate health hazards. 19.28.260 Substandard systems. All OWTS within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that do not meet the minimum design requirements of this Chapter shall be deemed substandard. Sites with substandard OWTS shall be prohibited from having future additions or modifications to the property that would potentially increase wastewater flow to the OWTS or decrease the amount of usable area available for the OWTS. 19.28.270 Abandoned onsite wastewater treatment systems. A. All abandoned OWTS shall be disposed of in accordance with this section. An OWTS Abandonment Permit must be obtained prior to the removal or disposal of any abandoned OWTS. For the purposes of this section, an OWTS shall be considered abandoned if it has been out of service for more than three consecutive months. B. Every OWTS that has been abandoned or has been discontinued from further use or to which no waste or waste discharge pipe from a plumbing fixture is connected must have all remaining sewage removed from, and disposed of by a qualified waste hauler and transported to a dispersal facility that operates in compliance with valid permit issued by a Regional Water Quality Control Board. 51 Page 732 C. Upon removal of all remaining sewage, the tank top and bottom must be crushed, backfilled and compacted with material approved by the director or be removed and disposed of in an approved manner. D. Completion of the above-described work shall require that the property owner obtain a septic tank abandonment permit from the director. 19.28.280 Abatement. To the extent possible, failing OWTS must be brought into compliance with this Code. In case of any failure, malfunction or breakdown of any OWTS, if not corrected within a time designated by the Director, the Director may order or cause corrections to be made and bill the property owner for the costs and may place a lien on the property for the abatement costs. The Director may also order the premises to be vacated if no safe manner of abatement is possible. 19.28.290 Notice of violation. The Director may provide a notice of intent to record a notice of violation to the owner of property upon which a failing or substandard OWTS exists. Notice will be provided to the property owner by mail at the address shown on the latest assessment roll or at any other address of the owner known to the director. The notice will also be posted on the property. The notice will state that within 15 days of the date of the notice, the property owner may request a meeting with the Director to present evidence that a violation does not exist. If, within 15 days of the date of the notice, the property owner does not request a meeting and the violation has not been corrected, or if, after considering the evidence presented by the property owner at the meeting, the Director determines that a code violation in fact exists, the Director may record a notice of violation in the office of the County Recorder. Upon recording the notice, the Director will notify the owner of the action. The notice is to inform all parties that no improvements, including building additions, can be approved while the failing or substandard OWTS continues in operation. At the request of any affected property owner and upon full payment of any fees established by resolution of the city council for recovery of associated enforcement costs and payment of any fee for the recordation of the notice of violation, the Director will issue a notice of expungement of violation upon proof to the director that the noticed violation has been remedied. The notice of expungement may be recorded by the property owner at his or her expense. 52 Page 733 19.28.300 Appeal from denial, revocation or suspension. A. Any person aggrieved by any decision of the Director with respect to the issuance or refusal to issue a OWTS permit may, within ten days of the date of the decision, appeal the decision to the city manager, or his or her designee, by filing a written notice of appeal with the city manager. B. The city manager, or his or her designee, shall thereupon fix a time and place for hearing such appeal within 30 days of the date of said decision. The aggrieved party shall be given notice of the time and place of the hearing by serving the notice personally or by depositing it in the United States Post Office in the city, certified mail, addressed to the aggrieved party at his or her last known address. C. The city manager, or his or her designee, shall have the authority to determine all questions raised on such appeal during the hearing. No such determination shall conflict with any substantive provision of this chapter. D. Following such hearing, the city manager, or his or her designee, may reverse, modify, or affirm the decision of the director with respect to the issuance or refusal to issue a license. The city manager shall render a decision within a reasonable period of time not to exceed 60 days of the conclusion of the hearing. The decision of the city manager, or his or her designee, shall be final. SECTION 3. The City Council declares that, should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence, or word of this Ordinance be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences, and words of this Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. 2018. SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify as to the adoption of this Ordinance. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of , Dennis Michael Mayor I, JANICE REYNOLDS, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the day of 53 Page 734 2018, and was finally passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the day of , 2018, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEMBERS: ATTEST: Janice Reynolds City Clerk 54 Page 735 DATE: TO: FROM: INITIATED BY: August 1, 2018 Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager Julie A. Sowles, Library Director SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF RECOMMENDATION TO BOARD OF TRUSTEES DIRECTORS. RECOMMENDATION: THE LIBRARY SUBCOMMITTEE'S RE -APPOINT MEMBERS TO THE LIBRARY AND THE LIBRARY FOUNDATION BOARD OF Staff recommends the City Council approve the Library Subcommittee's recommendation to reappoint Luella Hairston to the Library Board of Trustees and to reappoint Heidi Soehnel and Pamela Easter to the Library Foundation Board of Directors for full, four-year terms. BACKGROUND: Vacancies were created on both the Library Board of Trustees and the Library Foundation Board on July 1, 2018 as Ms. Hairston, Ms. Soehnel and Ms. Easter all reached the end of their current Board terms. Each of the Board Members has requested consideration to be reappointed to their respective Board for a full, four-year term. On July 18, 2018, the Library Subcommittee (Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy and Councilmember Williams) unanimously recommended that Luella Hairston be reappointed to the Library Board of Trustees, and that Heidi Soehnel and Pamela Easter be reappointed to the Library Foundation Board of Directors. ANALYSIS: Luella Hairston, Heidi Soehnel and Pamela Easter have each contributed countless hours to the Rancho Cucamonga Library through service on their respective Boards. Their dedication, expertise and passion for the Library will be invaluable as the Library continues to focus on enhancing Library Services and move forward with fundraising for a Second Story capital campaign. FISCAL IMPACT: None. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: N/A. Page 736