Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2018-08-15 - Agenda PacketAGENDA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD -HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY - SUCCESSOR AGENCY -PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY -CITY COUNCIL Wednesday, August 15, 2018 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 REGULAR MEETINGS: 1st and 3rd Wednesdays - 7:00 P.M. ORDER OF BUSINESS: CLOSED SESSION TAPIA CONFERENCE ROOM 5:00 P.M. REGULAR MEETINGS COUNCILCHAMBERS 7:00 P.M. MEMBERS: MAYOR L. Dennis Michael CITYMANAGER John R. Gillison MAYOR PRO TEM Lynne B. Kennedy CITYATTORNEY James L. Markman COUNCIL MEMBERS William Alexander CITYCLERK Janice C. Reynolds Sam Spagnolo CITYTREASURER James C. Frost Diane Williams Rancho Cucamonga City Council Mission Statement . Make decisions, and be perceived as making decisions, for the general welfare of the community. . Always work to improve existing services and develop policies to meet the expected as well as anticipated needs of the community. . Work together cooperatively to respect all persons and their ideas in order to develop and maintain the trust of the community. Reflect the community's desires and priorities by assuring that decisions accurately reflect the community's interests by fairly translating public feedback into public policy. . Enhance the quality of life of all Rancho Cucamonga residents through the continued pursuit of excellence and commitment to the City's core values and goals. • Set the vision for the community for the future. • Have a professional, objective and respectful relationship with each other in order to more effectively address the challenges of the future. Page 1 .A.% INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC [ UCAMONGA TO ADDRESS THE FIRE BOARD, HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY. SUCCESSOR AGENCYY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITYAND CITYCOUNCIL The Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council encourage free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the Agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council by filling out a speaker card and submitting it to the City Clerk. The speaker cards are located on the wall at the back of the Chambers, at the front desk behind the staff table and at the City Clerk's desk. Any handouts for the Fire Board, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority or City Council should be given to the City Clerk for distribution. During "Public Communications," your name will be called to speak on any item listed or not listed on the agenda in the order in which it was received. The "Public Communications" period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these business items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the agenda commences. Any other "Public Communications" which have not concluded during this one-hour period may resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. If you are present to speak on an "Advertised Public Hearing" or on an "Administrative Hearing" Item(s), your name will be alled when that item is being discussed, in the order in which it was received. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary bythe Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. AGENDA BACK-UP MATERIALS Staff reports and back-up materials for agenda items are available for review at the City Clerk's counter, the City's Public Libraries and on the City's website. A complete copy of the agenda is also available at the desk located behind the staff table during the Council meeting. LIVE BROADCAST Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and CityCouncil meetings are broadcast live on Channel 3 for those with cable television access. Meetings are rebroadcast on the second and fourth Wednesdays of each month at 7:00 p.m. Streaming Video on Demand is available on the City's website at www.cityofrc.us/cityhall/council/videos.asp. The Fire Board, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council meet regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive. Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, and Public Financing Authority. Copies of the agendas and minutes can be found @ www.cityofrc.us If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's office at (909) 477-2700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. Please silence all cell phones and devices while the meeting is in session. Page 2 AUGUST 15, 2018 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITYAND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA CLOSED SESSION - 5:00 RM. Roll Call: Mayor Michael Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy Council Members Alexander, Spagnolo and Williams A. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) - Council Chambers B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) C. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION - Tapia Conference Room D.1. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR ROBERT NEIUBER, HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54954.2 REGARDING LABOR NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION (RCCEA)AND TEAMSTERS LOCAL 1932.—CITY D.2. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE NORTH WEST CORNER OF ARROW ROUTE AND ROCHESTER AVENUE AS PARCEL NUMBERS 0229-012-08-0000 AND 0229-012-10-0000; NEGOTIATING PARTIES MATT BURRIS, DEPUTY CITY MANAGER/ECONOMIC & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND DAN DE LA PAZ, REPRESENTING THE PROPERTY OWNER; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS. — CITY D.3. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(d)(1) — CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, DIVISION OF OCCUPATIONAL SAFETYAND HEALTH; CITATION AND NOTIFICATION OF PENALTY, CSHO ID H2O40, INSPECTION #1281145. - CITY DA. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE NORTH WEST CORNER OF CIVIC CENTER DRIVE AND HAVEN AVENUE AS PARCEL NUMBERS 0208-331-47-0000 AND 0208-331-40-0000; NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND KEN WARD REPRESENTING UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS. — CITY Page 3 D.5. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 5917 ARCHIBALD AVENUE; NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND LINDA J.L. MARIE WALKER AND JOSEPH A. WALKER, OWNERS; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS. - CITY D.6. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA METROLINK STATION IDENTIFIED AS PARCEL NUMBERS 0209-272-11, 0209-143-21, AND 0209-272-22; NEGOTIATING PARTIES CITY MANAGER JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CARRIE SCHINDLER REPRESENTING SBCTA, AND MICHAEL DIEDEN REPRESENTING EMPIRE YARDS AT RANCHO, LLC; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS. —CITY E. RECESS CLOSED SESSION TO RECESS TO THE REGULAR FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY, AND CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS AT 7:00 P.M. IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS AT CITY HALL, LOCATED AT 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. REGULAR MEETING - 7:00 RM. COUNCIL CHAMBERS THE REGULAR MEETINGS OF THE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY, AND CITY COUNCIL WILL BE CALLED TO ORDER. IT IS THE INTENT TO CONCLUDE THE MEETINGS BY 10:00 P.M., UNLESS EXTENDED BY CONCURRENCE OF THE FIRE BOARD, AGENCIES, AUTHORITY BOARD AND COUNCIL. Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call: Mayor Michael Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy Council Members Alexander, Spagnolo and Williams A. ANNOUNCEMENT/ PRESENTATIONS A.1. Announcement of Participation in the NBC and Telemundo "Clear the Shelter" Adoption --- Event at the Animal Center on Saturday, August 18, 2018. A.2. Rancho Cucamonga Police Department Recap of 2018 National Night Out Event. --- B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS CONSENT CALENDARS: The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non -controversial. They will be acted upon by the Fire Board/Housing Successor Agency/Successor Agency/Authority Board/Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Fire Board/Housing Successor Agency/Successor Agency/Authority Board/Council Member for discussion. C. CONSENT CALENDAR- FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT C.1. Consideration to Approve Bi -Weekly Payroll in the Amount of $719,823.35 and Weekly 10 Check Registers in the Amount of $437,882.09 Dated July 24, 2018 Through August 07, 2018 and Electronic Debit Register for the Month of July 2018 in the Amount of $2,426,910.34. Page 4 C.2. Consideration to Receive and File Current Investment Schedule as of July 31, 2018. 25 C.3. Consideration of an Increase to HMC Architects Contract No. FD 17-003, in the Amount of $339,583, and Approval of Amendment No. 03 for Additional Architectural Design Services 33 for the Change in Scope for the New Public Safety Facility, to Include the Relocation of the San Bernardino Road Fire Station (172). CA. Consideration to Renew Contract CO 14-175 with ABC Locksmith, Inc. for Citywide Keys, 40 Keys Repair and Replacement on an As Needed Basis. C.5. Consideration to continue the Citywide Procurement of Gasoline and Diesel fuel from 44 Southern Counties Oil Company dba SC Fuels on a Month to Month Basis Funded by Various Account Numbers in Accordance with the FY 2018/19 Adopted Budget. D. CONSENT CALENDAR -HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY E. CONSENT CALENDAR -SUCCESSOR AGENCY F. CONSENT CALENDAR- PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY G. CONSENT CALENDAR - CITY COUNCIL G.1. Consideration to Approve Bi -Weekly Payroll in the Amount of $1,166,634.97 and Weekly Check Registers in the Amount of $7,014,477.39 Dated July 24, 2018 Through August 07, 46 2018 and Electronic Debit Register for the Month of July 2018 in the Amount of $3,588,105.71. G.2. Consideration to Receive and File Current Investment Schedule as of July 31, 2018. 61 G.3. Consideration of a Contract with Absolute Security International, Inc. for Security Guard 74 Services at Various City Facilities. GA. Consideration to Renew Contract CO 14-183 with Climatec, LLC for Citywide Energy 220 Management and HVAC Automation Control. G.5. Consideration to Renew of Contract CO 14-175 with ABC Locksmiths, Inc. for Citywide 240 Keys, Key Repair and Replacement on an As Needed Basis. G.6. Consideration to Continue the Citywide Procurement of Gasoline and Diesel Fuel from 244 Southern Counties Oil Company DBA SC Fuels on a Month to Month basis Funded by Various Account Numbers in Accordance with the FY 2018/19 Adopted Budget. G.7. Consideration of Amendment No. 011 authorizing an increase to the Professional Services Agreement with International Line Builders, Inc. in the amount of $23,770 for Fiscal Year 246 2018/19 and authorizing an appropriation in the amount of $23,770 from the Municipal Utility Fund for Street Light and Cabling Improvements located at Arrow Route and Yellowwood Place. G.8. Consideration of a Professional Services Agreement with Magellan Advisors, LLC in the 249 amount of $250,000 for Fiber Master Plan Consultation Services and Network Design Expansion, authorize an appropriation in the amount of $50,000 from the Fiber Optic Network Fund for Construction Management Services and transfer funds to Contract Services. G.9. Consideration to Accept as Complete, File the Notice Of Completion, and Authorize 285 Release of Retention and Bonds for the Citywide LED Safety Light Renovation Project. G.10. Consideration of a Purchase Order to Siemens Industry, Inc. for An Emergency Replacement of the Traffic Signal Controller Cabinet at Haven Avenue and Church Street. 287 G.11. Consideration of the Final Map of Tract No. 20080, an Improvement Agreement, 289 Page 5 Improvement Security, and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Light Maintenance District No.'s 1 and 2 Related to Said Tract, Located at the Northwest Corner of Victoria Street and Hermosa Avenue, Submitted by Hermosa, LLC, a Limited Liability Company. RESOLUTION NO. 18-082 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO 292 CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (GENERAL CITY) FOR PROJECT CASE NO. SUBTT20080 RESOLUTION NO. 18-083 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO 297 CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS) FOR SUBTT20080 RESOLUTION NO. 18-084 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO 302 CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 (LOCAL STREETS) FOR SUBTT20080 G.12. Consideration of a Small Cell License Agreement with New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company (AT&T) for the Placement of Small Cell Infrastructure 307 on City -Owned Poles. G.13. Consideration of an Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security, and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Light Maintenance District 309 No.'s 1 and 6 Related to Case No. DRC2016-00670, Located at the Northeast Corner of 4th Street and Utica Avenue, Submitted by Fourth & Utica L.P. C/O I DS Real Estate. RESOLUTION NO.18-085 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN 312 TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B (COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL MAINTENANCE DISTRICT) FOR DRC2016-00670 RESOLUTION NO. 18-086 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN 317 TERRITORY TO STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS) FOR DRC2016-00670 RESOLUTION NO. 18-087 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN 322 TERRITORY TO STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL) FOR DRC2016-00670 G.14. Consideration of an Improvement Agreement and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A and Street Light Maintenance District No.'s 1 and 6 Related to 327 Case No. DRC2016-00294 located at 9455 Hyssop Drive, Submitted by Chase Partners, LTD. Page 6 RESOLUTION NO. 18-088 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN 330 TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3A (HYSSOP MAINTENANCE DISTRICT) FOR DRC2016-00294 RESOLUTION NO. 18-089 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO 335 CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS) FOR DRC2016-00294 RESOLUTION NO. 18-090 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN 340 TERRITORY TO STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL) FOR DRC2016-00294 G.15. Consideration of the Biennial Review of the Conflict of Interest Code for the Fire Protection 345 District and City. G.16. Consideration to Approve an Adjustment to the Budget Analyst Salary Range and Adopt a Resolution Updating the Rancho Cucamonga City Employees Association Salary Schedule 346 for Fiscal Year 2018/19, Including a Salary Adjustment to the Budget Analyst Classification. RESOLUTION NO. 18-091 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING UPDATED RANCHO CUCAMONGA 348 CITY EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION SALARY SCHEDULE FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018/19, INCLUDING A SALARY ADJUSTMENT TO THE BUDGET ANALYST CLASSIFICATION The following Ordinances have been introduced for first reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non -controversial. The City Council will act upon them at one time without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be removed for discussion by a Council Member. H.1. Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance No. 936, Amending Chapter 19.28 in its 354 entirety of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code regarding the Local Agency Management Plan for Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems. ORDINANCE NO. 936 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 19.28 IN ITS ENTIRETY OF 368 THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING THE LOCAL AGENCY MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR ONSITE WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS Page 7 I. ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING ITEM J. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS -CITY COUNCIL The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Mayor will open the meeting to receive public testimony. J.1. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2015- 00683 —ARCHIBALD OIL —A request to amend the General Plan land use designation 422 from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial for a 1.22 -acre site located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route; AP Ns: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291- 06. Related Files: Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684, Design Review DRC2015- 00682, Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-00681, Variance DRC2016-00831, and Minor Exception DRC2017-00879. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONING MAP AMENDMENT DRC2015- 00684 —ARCHI BALD OIL —A request to amend the Zoning Map land use district from the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the General Commercial (GC) District for a 1.22 - acre site located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route; APNs: 0208- 291-05 and 0208-291-06. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683, Design Review DRC2015-00682, Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-00681, Variance DRC2016-00831, and Minor Exception DRC2017-00879. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. RESOLUTION NO. 18-080 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO 752 CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN MAP AMENDMENT NO. DRC2015-00683, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION FROM LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL TO GENERAL COMMERCIAL FOR A 1.22 -ACRE SITE LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF ARCHI BALD AVENUE AND ARROW ROUTE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF —APNS: 0208-291-05 AND 0208-291-06. ORDINANCE NO. 937 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ZONING MAP AMENDMENT NO. 757 DRC2015-00684, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE ZONING MAP LAND USE DISTRICT FROM THE LOW MEDIUM (LM) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT TO THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL (GC) DISTRICT FOR A 1.22 -ACRE SITE LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND ARROW ROUTE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF — APNS: 0208-291-05 AND 0208-291- 06. J.2. Public Hearing On Issuance of Tax Exempt Bonds For The Day Creek Villas Senior 762 Housing Complex and Consideration of a Resolution Approving The Issuance of Bonds. RESOLUTION NO. 18-081 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING THE ISSUANCE BY THE CALIFORNIA STATEWIDE 765 COMMUNITIES DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF MULTIFAMILY HOUSING REVENUE BONDS FOR DAY CREEK VILLAS K. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. K.1. Consideration to Approve a Memorandum of Understanding with the Chaffey Community 767 College District Establishing a Partnership for Public Art Displays at City Hall. Page 8 L. COUNCIL BUSINESS L.1. COUNCIL ANNOUCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Council Member.) L.2. INTER -AGENCY UPDATES (Update by the City Council to the community on the meetings that were attended.) M. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING N. ADJOURNMENT CERTIFICATION I, Linda A. Troyan, MMC, City Clerk Services Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify under penalty of perjury that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on at least Seventy -Two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California and on the City's website. Page 9 POLICE • COMMUNITY PARTNERSHi P9 NATIONAL NIGHT OUT RANCHO CUCAMONGA POLICE DEPARTMENT WHAT IS NN09m • NATIONAL CAMPAIGN LAW ENFORCEMENT TEAMS UP WITH THE COMMUNITY AND BUSINESSES • AWARENESS AND ENCOURAGE EVERYONE TO KEEP CRIME OUT OF OUR NEIGHBORHOODS • PROACTIVELY- NEIGHBORHOOD WATCH AND REPORTING SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY VENDORS 48 VENDORS PARTICIPATED • COMMUNITY BASED - CITY AND COUNTY PARTNERS • PROVIDE SERVICE TO RESIDENTS • FOOD AND FUN THANK YOU ! • CITY AND DEPARTMENT'S SUPPORT VALUED BY RC CITIZENS • OPPORTUNITY TO SHARE CRIME PREVENTION INFORMATION RnNcxn CUCAMONGA m R DATE: August 15, 2018 TO: President and Members of the Board of Directors FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Tamara Layne, Finance Director SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE BI -WEEKLY PAYROLL IN THE AMOUNT OF $719,823.35 AND WEEKLY CHECK REGISTERS IN THE AMOUNT OF $437,882.09 DATED JULY 24, 2018 THROUGH AUGUST 07, 2018 AND ELECTRONIC DEBIT REGISTER FOR THE MONTH OF JULY 2018 IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,426,910.34. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Fire Board approve payment of demands as presented. BACKGROUND: N/A ANALYSIS: N/A FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate budgeted funds are available for the payment of demands per the attached listing. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: N/A ATTACHMENTS: Description Attachment 1 Check Register Attachment 1 Electronic Register Page 10 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 7/24/2018 through 8/7/2018 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00008143 07/25/2018 AHUMADA, ALEXANDER R 0.00 631.60 631.60 AP 00008144 07/25/2018 ALMAND, LLOYD 0.00 631.60 631.60 AP 00008145 07/25/2018 BANTAU, VICTORIA 0.00 499.68 499.68 AP 00008146 07/25/2018 BAZAL, SUSAN 0.00 585.98 585.98 AP 00008147 07/25/2018 BELL, MICHAEL L. 0.00 1,214.46 1,214.46 AP 00008148 07/25/2018 BERRY, DAVID 0.00 1,152.40 1,152.40 AP 00008149 07/25/2018 BROCK, ROBIN 0.00 923.03 923.03 AP 00008150 07/25/2018 CAMPBELL, GERALD 0.00 826.04 826.04 AP 00008151 07/25/2018 CAMPBELL, STEVEN 0.00 1,327.27 1,327.27 AP 00008152 07/25/2018 CARNES, KENNETH 0.00 499.68 499.68 AP 00008153 07/25/2018 CLABBY, RICHARD 0.00 1,152.40 1,152.40 AP 00008154 07/25/2018 CLOUGHESY, DONALD R 0.00 1,618.70 1,618.70 AP 00008155 07/25/2018 CORCORAN, ROBERT 0.00 540.73 540.73 AP 00008156 07/25/2018 COSTELLO, DENNIS M 0.00 1,618.70 1,618.70 AP 00008157 07/25/2018 COX, KARL 0.00 631.60 631.60 AP 00008158 07/25/2018 CRANE, RALPH 0.00 968.28 968.28 AP 00008159 07/25/2018 CROSSLAND, WILBUR 0.00 499.68 499.68 AP 00008160 07/25/2018 DAGUE, JAMES 0.00 1,214.46 1,214.46 AP 00008161 07/25/2018 DE ANTONIO, SUSAN 0.00 540.73 540.73 AP 00008162 07/25/2018 DEANS, JACKIE 0.00 585.98 585.98 AP 00008163 07/25/2018 DOMINICK, SAMUEL A. 0.00 923.03 923.03 AP 00008164 07/25/2018 EAGLESON, MICHAEL 0.00 1,214.46 1,214.46 AP 00008165 07/25/2018 EGGERS, BOB 0.00 1,618.70 1,618.70 AP 00008166 07/25/2018 FRITCHEY, JOHN D. 0.00 499.68 499.68 AP 00008167 07/25/2018 HEYDE, DONALD 0.00 631.60 631.60 AP 00008168 07/25/2018 INTERLICCHIA, ROSALYN 0.00 249.30 249.30 AP 00008169 07/25/2018 KILMER, STEPHEN 0.00 1,152.40 1,152.40 AP 00008170 07/25/2018 LANE, WILLIAM 0.00 1,214.46 1,214.46 AP 00008171 07/25/2018 LARKIN, DAVID W 0.00 1,538.02 1,538.02 AP 00008172 07/25/2018 LEE, ALLAN J. 0.00 1,264.92 1,264.92 AP 00008173 07/25/2018 LENZE, PAUL E 0.00 1,093.58 1,093.58 AP 00008174 07/25/2018 LONGO, JOE 0.00 183.34 183.34 AP 00008175 07/25/2018 LUTTRULL, DARRELL 0.00 499.68 499.68 AP 00008176 07/25/2018 MACKALL, BEVERLY 0.00 509.70 509.70 AP 00008177 07/25/2018 MAYFIELD, RON 0.00 1,304.96 1,304.96 AP 00008178 07/25/2018 MCKEE, JOHN 0.00 631.60 631.60 AP 00008179 07/25/2018 MCNEIL, KENNETH 0.00 631.60 631.60 AP 00008180 07/25/2018 MICHAEL, L. DENNIS 0.00 923.03 923.03 AP 00008181 07/25/2018 MORGAN, BYRON 0.00 1,714.62 1,714.62 AP 00008182 07/25/2018 MYSKOW, DENNIS 0.00 1,152.40 1,152.40 AP 00008183 07/25/2018 NAUMAN, MICHAEL 0.00 499.68 499.68 AP 00008184 07/25/2018 NEE, RON 0.00 585.98 585.98 AP 00008185 07/25/2018 NELSON, MARY JANE 0.00 183.34 183.34 AP 00008186 07/25/2018 O'BRIEN, TOM 0.00 1,618.70 1,618.70 AP 00008187 07/25/2018 PLOUNG, MICHAEL J 0.00 558.94 558.94 AP 00008188 07/25/2018 POST, MICHAEL R 0.00 1,586.77 1,586.77 AP 00008189 07/25/2018 PROULX, PATRICK 0.00 1,618.70 1,618.70 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 1 Current Date: 08/08/2018 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:27:11 Page 11 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 7/24/2018 through 8/7/2018 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00008190 07/25/2018 REDMOND, MIKE 0.00 1,214.46 1,214.46 AP 00008191 07/25/2018 ROEDER, JEFF 0.00 1,214.46 1,214.46 AP 00008192 07/25/2018 SALISBURY, THOMAS 0.00 631.60 631.60 AP 00008193 07/25/2018 SMITH, RONALD 0.00 499.68 499.68 AP 00008194 07/25/2018 SORENSEN, SCOTT D 0.00 1,736.35 1,736.35 AP 00008195 07/25/2018 SPAGNOLO, SAM 0.00 499.68 499.68 AP 00008196 07/25/2018 SPAIN, WILLIAM 0.00 826.04 826.04 AP 00008197 07/25/2018 SULLIVAN, JAMES 0.00 499.68 499.68 AP 00008198 07/25/2018 TAYLOR, STEVE 0.00 1,461.55 1,461.55 AP 00008199 07/25/2018 TULEY, TERRY 0.00 1,214.46 1,214.46 AP 00008200 07/25/2018 VANDERKALLEN, FRANCIS 0.00 631.60 631.60 AP 00008201 07/25/2018 VARNEY, ANTHONY 0.00 923.03 923.03 AP 00008202 07/25/2018 WALTON, KEVIN 0.00 1,538.02 1,538.02 AP 00008203 07/25/2018 YOWELL, TIMOTHY A 0.00 1,304.96 1,304.96 AP 00008204 07/25/2018 RIVERSIDE, CITY OF 6,909.00 0.00 6,909.00 AP 00008205 07/25/2018 SAN BERNARDINO CTY SHERIFFS DEPT 3,129,696.45 0.00 3,129,696.45 AP 00008206 08/01/2018 CALIF GOVERNMENT VEBA/RANCHO CUCAMONGA 37,861.44 0.00 37,861.44 AP 00008207 08/01/2018 RCCEA 1,780.00 0.00 1,780.00 AP 00008208 08/01/2018 RCPFA 11,509.11 0.00 11,509.11 AP 00008209 08/01/2018 RE ASTORIA 2 LLC 129,329.67 0.00 129,329.67 AP 00008210 08/01/2018 SHELL ENERGY NORTH AMERICA 219,750.00 0.00 219,750.00 AP 00392512 07/24/2018 CALIFORNIA DPT OF TAX & FEE ADMINISTRATION 912.12 52,992.86 53,904.98 *** AP 00392519 07/24/2018 CALIFORNIA DPT OF TAX & FEE ADMINISTRATION 1,752.57 620.90 2,373.47 *** AP 00392520 07/25/2018 CURATALO, JAMES 0.00 1,618.70 1,618.70 AP 00392521 07/25/2018 KIRKPATRICK, WILLIAM 0.00 1,093.58 1,093.58 AP 00392522 07/25/2018 LONCAR, PHILIP 0.00 1,152.40 1,152.40 AP 00392523 07/25/2018 TOWNSEND, JAMES 0.00 1,618.70 1,618.70 AP 00392524 07/25/2018 WALKER, KENNETH 0.00 249.30 249.30 AP 00392525 07/25/2018 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 709.53 0.00 709.53 AP 00392526 07/25/2018 ALL WELDING 197.00 0.00 197.00 AP 00392527 07/25/2018 ALLSTAR SOUND LLC 1,155.00 0.00 1,155.00 AP 00392528 07/25/2018 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 825.00 0.00 825.00 AP 00392529 07/25/2018 AUFBAU CORPORATION 34,200.00 0.00 34,200.00 AP 00392530 07/25/2018 AUFBAU CORPORATION 28,184.00 0.00 28,184.00 AP 00392531 07/25/2018 BARNES AND NOBLE 1,599.43 0.00 1,599.43 AP 00392532 07/25/2018 BASTIANSEN, MARGARET 9.00 0.00 9.00 AP 00392533 07/25/2018 BEST BEST AND KRIEGER 3,970.11 0.00 3,970.11 AP 00392534 07/25/2018 BLUM ELECTRIC 1,466.00 0.00 1,466.00 AP 00392535 07/25/2018 BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERVICES INC. 279,557.71 0.00 279,557.71 AP 00392536 07/25/2018 BRYAN CAVE LEIGHTON PAISNER LLP 1,685.00 0.00 1,685.00 AP 00392537 07/25/2018 C V W D 0.00 507.04 507.04 AP 00392541 07/25/2018 C V W D 103,919.98 1,897.36 105,817.34 *** AP 00392542 07/25/2018 C.P. CONSTRUCTION CO INC 10,548.32 0.00 10,548.32 AP 00392543 07/25/2018 CAINES, DAN 15.00 0.00 15.00 AP 00392544 07/25/2018 CALIFORNIA BANK & TRUST 29,697.46 0.00 29,697.46 AP 00392545 07/25/2018 CALIFORNIA BUILDING STANDARDS COMMISSION 902.70 0.00 902.70 AP 00392546 07/25/2018 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF 4,964.51 0.00 4,964.51 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 2 Current Date: 08/08/2018 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:27:11 Page 12 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 7/24/2018 through 8/7/2018 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00392547 07/25/2018 CINTAS CORPORATION #150 1,050.46 0.00 1,050.46 AP 00392548 07/25/2018 CRIME SCENE STERI-CLEAN LLC 810.00 0.00 810.00 AP 00392549 07/25/2018 D M CONTRACTING INC 18,840.78 0.00 18,840.78 AP 00392551 07/25/2018 D M CONTRACTING INC 216,227.05 0.00 216,227.05 AP 00392552 07/25/2018 DATA TICKET INC 4,235.57 0.00 4,235.57 AP 00392553 07/25/2018 DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION 5,551.90 0.00 5,551.90 AP 00392554 07/25/2018 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 6,538.00 0.00 6,538.00 AP 00392555 07/25/2018 DLIMAGING 139.17 0.00 139.17 AP 00392556 07/25/2018 DUNN, YOLANDA 15.00 0.00 15.00 AP 00392557 07/25/2018 DURKEL, CAROL 65.95 0.00 65.95 AP 00392558 07/25/2018 EMBROIDME 96.98 0.00 96.98 AP 00392559 07/25/2018 ENN GEE CORP. 585.00 0.00 585.00 AP 00392560 07/25/2018 EXPERIAN 52.00 0.00 52.00 AP 00392561 07/25/2018 FACER, LINDA 51.00 0.00 51.00 AP 00392562 07/25/2018 FAMILY SERVICES ASSOCIATION 10,700.00 0.00 10,700.00 AP 00392563 07/25/2018 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 11.65 0.00 11.65 AP 00392564 07/25/2018 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 18.29 0.00 18.29 AP 00392565 07/25/2018 FOOTHILL FAMILY SHELTER 2,500.00 0.00 2,500.00 AP 00392566 07/25/2018 G AND M BUSINESS INTERIORS 6,056.51 0.00 6,056.51 AP 00392567 07/25/2018 GAIL MATERIALS 2,385.61 0.00 2,385.61 AP 00392568 07/25/2018 GATEWAY PET CEMETERY AND CREMATORY 720.00 0.00 720.00 AP 00392569 07/25/2018 GEOGRAPHICS 1,071.19 0.00 1,071.19 AP 00392570 07/25/2018 GEORGE HILLS COMPANY 1,344.60 0.00 1,344.60 AP 00392571 07/25/2018 GRAINGER 556.44 0.00 556.44 AP 00392572 07/25/2018 GRAVES & KING LLP 555.00 0.00 555.00 AP 00392573 07/25/2018 HANSEN, BARBARA 21.80 0.00 21.80 AP 00392574 07/25/2018 HDR ENGINEERING INC 5,056.82 0.00 5,056.82 AP 00392575 07/25/2018 HENRY SCHEIN ANIMAL HEALTH SUPPLY 1,125.52 0.00 1,125.52 AP 00392576 07/25/2018 HERMAN, PENNI 285.04 0.00 285.04 AP 00392577 07/25/2018 HMC ARCHITECTS 0.00 54,396.72 54,396.72 AP 00392578 07/25/2018 HUB CONSTRUCTION SPECIALTIES INC 1,468.37 0.00 1,468.37 AP 00392579 07/25/2018 IDEXX DISTRIBUTION INC 5,192.94 0.00 5,192.94 AP 00392580 07/25/2018 INDUSTRIAL HARDWARE AND SERVICE CO 282.31 0.00 282.31 AP 00392581 07/25/2018 INLAND PRESORT & MAILING SERVICES 134.02 0.00 134.02 AP 00392582 07/25/2018 INTERNATIONAL LINE BUILDERS INC 188,754.07 125,836.06 314,590.13 *** AP 00392583 07/25/2018 INTERVET INC 4,840.96 0.00 4,840.96 AP 00392584 07/25/2018 JURMAN, KIMBERLY 140.00 0.00 140.00 AP 00392585 07/25/2018 KABAGE, HEIDI 15.00 0.00 15.00 AP 00392586 07/25/2018 LANDCARE USA LLC 11,580.00 0.00 11,580.00 AP 00392587 07/25/2018 LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC. 10,117.73 0.00 10,117.73 AP 00392588 07/25/2018 LEONIDA BUILDERS INC 12,500.00 0.00 12,500.00 AP 00392589 07/25/2018 LIBERTY PLUGINS INC 1,620.00 0.00 1,620.00 AP 00392590 07/25/2018 LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION 1,181.82 0.00 1,181.82 AP 00392591 07/25/2018 MAIN STREET SIGNS 409.18 0.00 409.18 AP 00392592 07/25/2018 MARIPOSA LANDSCAPES INC 26,295.66 1,208.16 27,503.82 *** AP 00392593 07/25/2018 MEDIWASTE DISPOSAL 102.12 0.00 102.12 AP 00392594 07/25/2018 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 1,656.61 0.00 1,656.61 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 3 Current Date: 08/08/2018 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:27:11 Page 13 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 7/24/2018 through 8/7/2018 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00392595 07/25/2018 NEWCO DISTRIBUTORS INC 440.70 0.00 440.70 AP 00392596 07/25/2018 NEWCOMB ANDERSON MCCORMICK INC 1,630.00 0.00 1,630.00 AP 00392597 07/25/2018 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CTRS OF CA 736.66 0.00 736.66 AP 00392598 07/25/2018 ONTARIO SPAY AND NEUTER INC 200.00 0.00 200.00 AP 00392599 07/25/2018 ONTRAC 52.10 0.00 52.10 AP 00392600 07/25/2018 ONWARD ENGINEERING 192.00 0.00 192.00 AP 00392601 07/25/2018 ONWARD ENGINEERING 22,795.00 0.00 22,795.00 AP 00392602 07/25/2018 OPARC 440.00 0.00 440.00 AP 00392603 07/25/2018 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL INC 3,940.36 0.00 3,940.36 AP 00392604 07/25/2018 RCPFA 0.00 59.00 59.00 AP 00392605 07/25/2018 REYNAGA, FRACISCO 15.00 0.00 15.00 AP 00392606 07/25/2018 RIO HONDO COLLEGE 53.00 0.00 53.00 AP 00392607 07/25/2018 RJM DESIGN GROUP INC 11,477.75 0.00 11,477.75 AP 00392608 07/25/2018 ROADRUNNER PHARMACY 1,095.08 0.00 1,095.08 AP 00392609 07/25/2018 ROTARY CLUB OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 208.23 0.00 208.23 AP 00392610 07/25/2018 ROTO ROOTER 2,190.00 1,250.00 3,440.00 *** AP 00392611 07/25/2018 SAFEWAY SIGN COMPANY 21,614.38 0.00 21,614.38 AP 00392612 07/25/2018 SAN BERNARDINO CO AUDITOR CONT 10,302.68 0.00 10,302.68 AP 00392613 07/25/2018 SC FUELS 0.00 12,284.24 12,284.24 AP 00392614 07/25/2018 SHOETERIA 355.00 0.00 355.00 AP 00392615 07/25/2018 SILVER & WRIGHT LLP 12,348.41 0.00 12,348.41 AP 00392616 07/25/2018 SMITH, THERESE 65.95 0.00 65.95 AP 00392617 07/25/2018 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 49.56 0.00 49.56 AP 00392618 07/25/2018 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 149.21 0.00 149.21 AP 00392619 07/25/2018 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 3,303.24 0.00 3,303.24 AP 00392620 07/25/2018 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 6,133.27 0.00 6,133.27 AP 00392621 07/25/2018 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,576.17 0.00 1,576.17 AP 00392622 07/25/2018 SOUTHERN CONTRACTING 1,197.95 0.00 1,197.95 AP 00392623 07/25/2018 STATEWIDE TRAFFIC SAFETY & SIGNS INC 9,764.70 0.00 9,764.70 AP 00392624 07/25/2018 SUNWORKS 13,060.00 0.00 13,060.00 AP 00392625 07/25/2018 SWAN-PRUNG, NATHAN 15.00 0.00 15.00 AP 00392626 07/25/2018 THOMSON REUTERS WEST PUBLISHING CORP 364.93 0.00 364.93 AP 00392627 07/25/2018 TOVEY/SHULTZ CONSTRUCTION INC 564,251.70 0.00 564,251.70 AP 00392628 07/25/2018 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 216.00 0.00 216.00 AP 00392629 07/25/2018 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 421.11 0.00 421.11 AP 00392630 07/25/2018 VICTOR MEDICAL COMPANY 24,665.04 0.00 24,665.04 AP 00392631 07/25/2018 VIVERAE INC 4,059.75 0.00 4,059.75 AP 00392632 07/25/2018 WANG, LI 120.00 0.00 120.00 AP 00392633 07/25/2018 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 1,943.60 0.00 1,943.60 AP 00392634 07/25/2018 WEST COAST SAND AND GRAVEL INC 1,150.59 0.00 1,150.59 AP 00392635 07/25/2018 WEST END MATERIAL SUPPLY 0.00 782.90 782.90 AP 00392636 07/25/2018 WIENER, ALITZAH 1,600.00 0.00 1,600.00 AP 00392637 07/25/2018 WILBUR-ELLIS COMPANY 435.31 0.00 435.31 AP 00392638 07/25/2018 XEROX FINANCIAL SERVICES 298.38 0.00 298.38 AP 00392639 07/25/2018 ZOETIS US LLC 1,824.55 0.00 1,824.55 AP 00392640 07/25/2018 ALLIANT INSURANCE SERVICES INC. 184.00 0.00 184.00 AP 00392641 07/25/2018 ALLIANT INSURANCE SERVICES INC. 285.00 0.00 285.00 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 4 Current Date: 08/08/2018 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:27:11 Page 14 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 7/24/2018 through 8/7/2018 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00392642 07/25/2018 ALTA VISTA MOBILE HOME PARK 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00392643 07/25/2018 AROCHO, ALMA 1,275.00 0.00 1,275.00 AP 00392644 07/25/2018 BALL, ROBERT 0.00 32.47 32.47 AP 00392645 07/25/2018 BAST, KAROLYN 202.80 0.00 202.80 AP 00392646 07/25/2018 CA LLC - DBA ALTA LAGUNA MHP 600.00 0.00 600.00 AP 00392647 07/25/2018 CACEO 469.00 0.00 469.00 AP 00392648 07/25/2018 CAL PERS LONG TERM CARE 254.14 0.00 254.14 AP 00392649 07/25/2018 CALIFORNIA SECRETARY OF STATE 40.00 0.00 40.00 AP 00392650 07/25/2018 CALPELRA 1,045.00 0.00 1,045.00 AP 00392651 07/25/2018 CASA VOLANTE MOBILE HOME PARK 800.00 0.00 800.00 AP 00392652 07/25/2018 CASTILLO, JESSIE 200.00 0.00 200.00 AP 00392653 07/25/2018 CASTILLO, JESSIE 300.00 0.00 300.00 AP 00392654 07/25/2018 CDW GOVERNMENT INC. 0.00 976.22 976.22 AP 00392655 07/25/2018 CERVANTES, VICTORIA LEE 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00392656 07/25/2018 CHAPARRAL HEIGHTS MOBILE HOME PARK 700.00 0.00 700.00 AP 00392657 07/25/2018 CHINO MOWER AND ENGINE SERVICE 470.06 0.00 470.06 AP 00392658 07/25/2018 CINTAS CORPORATION #150 0.00 404.03 404.03 AP 00392659 07/25/2018 CLARK, KAREN 792.00 0.00 792.00 AP 00392660 07/25/2018 DAISY 372.73 0.00 372.73 AP 00392661 07/25/2018 DATA21NC 4,500.63 0.00 4,500.63 AP 00392662 07/25/2018 DOLLARHIDE, GINGER 80.00 0.00 80.00 AP 00392663 07/25/2018 DUNN, ANN MARIE 539.38 0.00 539.38 AP 00392664 07/25/2018 EASTERLING, RAY 307.20 0.00 307.20 AP 00392665 07/25/2018 FBI-LEEDA 650.00 0.00 650.00 AP 00392666 07/25/2018 FINCHER, VERONICA 2,300.00 0.00 2,300.00 AP 00392667 07/25/2018 FLEET SERVICES INC. 0.00 24.11 24.11 AP 00392668 07/25/2018 FRANKLIN TRUCK PARTS 0.00 216.68 216.68 AP 00392670 07/25/2018 FRONTIER COMM 3,371.73 561.99 3,933.72 *** AP 00392671 07/25/2018 GASB 265.00 0.00 265.00 AP 00392672 07/25/2018 GIORDANO, MARIANNA 92.18 0.00 92.18 AP 00392673 07/25/2018 GRAINGER 75.29 0.00 75.29 AP 00392674 07/25/2018 GROVES ON FOOTHILL, THE 300.00 0.00 300.00 AP 00392675 07/25/2018 HAMILTON, MONIQUE 960.00 0.00 960.00 AP 00392676 07/25/2018 HAMPTON YOGA 1,068.00 0.00 1,068.00 AP 00392677 07/25/2018 HOMETOWN AMERICA RAMONA VILLA 800.00 0.00 800.00 AP 00392678 07/25/2018 HOSE MAN INC 0.00 913.77 913.77 AP 00392679 07/25/2018 IAPMO 300.00 0.00 300.00 AP 00392680 07/25/2018 IATSE NATIONAL HEALTH & WELFARE FUNDS 240.00 0.00 240.00 AP 00392681 07/25/2018 INDUSTRIAL HARDWARE AND SERVICE CO 1,594.70 0.00 1,594.70 AP 00392682 07/25/2018 INTERVET INC 4,840.96 0.00 4,840.96 AP 00392683 07/25/2018 JOHNSON, CHEARICE 83.06 0.00 83.06 AP 00392684 07/25/2018 KINETIC LIGHTING INC 1,500.00 0.00 1,500.00 AP 00392685 07/25/2018 KINGDOM CREATIONS 688.52 0.00 688.52 AP 00392686 07/25/2018 LATREACE, RAINEY 416.00 0.00 416.00 AP 00392687 07/25/2018 LAWDIS, STEVE 137.34 0.00 137.34 AP 00392688 07/25/2018 MANGO LANGUAGES 9,733.00 0.00 9,733.00 AP 00392689 07/25/2018 MARZOUGUI, SAMI 8.38 0.00 8.38 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 5 Current Date: 08/08/2018 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:27:11 Page 15 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 7/24/2018 through 8/7/2018 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00392690 07/25/2018 MASSAGE PALACE 490.63 0.00 490.63 AP 00392691 07/25/2018 MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 367.20 0.00 367.20 AP 00392692 07/25/2018 MILLER MANAGEMENT & CONSULTING GROUP 1,150.00 0.00 1,150.00 AP 00392693 07/25/2018 MOST DEPENDABLE FOUNTAINS INC 795.65 0.00 795.65 AP 00392694 07/25/2018 MYERS, CRICKET 666.00 0.00 666.00 AP 00392695 07/25/2018 NAPA AUTO PARTS 0.00 292.21 292.21 AP 00392696 07/25/2018 NEWCO DISTRIBUTORS INC 526.47 0.00 526.47 AP 00392697 07/25/2018 NORMANDIE, HEATHER 600.00 0.00 600.00 AP 00392698 07/25/2018 ORIEL, JASMIN 21.85 0.00 21.85 AP 00392699 07/25/2018 ORONA, PATRICIA 420.00 0.00 420.00 AP 00392700 07/25/2018 OTT, LAURA 753.00 0.00 753.00 AP 00392701 07/25/2018 OTT, SHARON 391.50 0.00 391.50 AP 00392702 07/25/2018 PACIFIC ANIMAL PRODUCTIONS 1,510.00 0.00 1,510.00 AP 00392703 07/25/2018 PAPAZOGLU, NORAY 1,130.40 0.00 1,130.40 AP 00392704 07/25/2018 PENINSULA PLASTICS LTD 1,700.00 0.00 1,700.00 AP 00392705 07/25/2018 PINEDA, JULIO 15.00 0.00 15.00 AP 00392706 07/25/2018 PINES MOBILE HOME PARK, THE 400.00 0.00 400.00 AP 00392707 07/25/2018 PSA PRINT GROUP 269.81 0.00 269.81 AP 00392708 07/25/2018 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 3,166.00 0.00 3,166.00 AP 00392709 07/25/2018 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 149.23 0.00 149.23 AP 00392710 07/25/2018 REA, GARY 2,104.08 0.00 2,104.08 AP 00392711 07/25/2018 RICK HUDDLE 1,400.00 0.00 1,400.00 AP 00392712 07/25/2018 RIGLEMAN, ENCARNACION ONTIVEROS 160.00 0.00 160.00 AP 00392713 07/25/2018 ROUCH, PETE 26.16 0.00 26.16 AP 00392714 07/25/2018 RUIZ, OCTAVIO 62.00 0.00 62.00 AP 00392715 07/25/2018 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 0.00 600.00 600.00 AP 00392716 07/25/2018 SCL 0.00 546.79 546.79 AP 00392717 07/25/2018 SENECHAL, CALVIN 489.00 0.00 489.00 AP 00392718 07/25/2018 SNYDER, MAKENZIE 0.00 298.41 298.41 AP 00392719 07/25/2018 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 18.52 243.12 261.64 *** AP 00392720 07/25/2018 SOUND IMAGE INC 890.95 0.00 890.95 AP 00392724 07/25/2018 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17,212.25 1,953.40 19,165.65 *** AP 00392725 07/25/2018 SOUTHLAND SPORTS OFFICIALS 2,120.00 0.00 2,120.00 AP 00392726 07/25/2018 STOR'EM SELF STORAGE 545.00 0.00 545.00 AP 00392727 07/25/2018 SYCAMORE VILLA MOBILE HOME PARK 300.00 0.00 300.00 AP 00392728 07/25/2018 SYSCO LOS ANGELES INC 1,979.42 0.00 1,979.42 AP 00392729 07/25/2018 THEATRE COMPANY, THE 245.00 0.00 245.00 AP 00392730 07/25/2018 TYUS, IDA 486.00 0.00 486.00 AP 00392731 07/25/2018 UNDERGROUND SVC ALERT OF SO CAL 272.35 0.00 272.35 AP 00392732 07/25/2018 UNITED SCENIC ARTISTS PENSION & WELFARE FUNDS 180.00 0.00 180.00 AP 00392733 07/25/2018 VALLEY POWER SYSTEMS INC 0.00 92.22 92.22 AP 00392734 07/25/2018 VASTA, WILLIAM 525.00 0.00 525.00 AP 00392735 07/25/2018 VISION SERVICE PLAN CA 11,333.38 0.00 11,333.38 AP 00392736 07/25/2018 VORTEX INDUSTRIES INC 0.00 396.00 396.00 AP 00392737 07/25/2018 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 1,848.53 0.00 1,848.53 AP 00392738 07/25/2018 WELLS FARGO BANK N A 3,500.00 0.00 3,500.00 AP 00392739 07/25/2018 WESTNET INC 0.00 6,963.32 6,963.32 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 6 Current Date: 08/08/2018 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:27:11 Page 16 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 7/24/2018 through 8/7/2018 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00392740 07/25/2018 YORK INSURANCE SERVICES GROUP INC 0.00 21,224.25 21,224.25 AP 00392741 07/26/2018 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 0.00 521.01 521.01 AP 00392742 07/26/2018 LN CURTIS AND SONS 0.00 1,313.39 1,313.39 AP 00392743 07/26/2018 OFFICE DEPOT 872.96 229.53 1,102.49 *** AP 00392744 07/26/2018 PSA PRINT GROUP 0.00 38.79 38.79 AP 00392745 07/26/2018 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 646.49 0.00 646.49 AP 00392746 07/26/2018 TUTOR.COM INC 20,000.00 0.00 20,000.00 AP 00392747 07/26/2018 ABC LOCKSMITHS 347.50 1,425.70 1,773.20 *** AP 00392748 07/26/2018 AIRGAS USA LLC 761.38 0.00 761.38 AP 00392749 07/26/2018 BIBLIOTHECA LLC 4,721.37 0.00 4,721.37 AP 00392754 07/26/2018 BRODART BOOKS 23,154.91 0.00 23,154.91 AP 00392755 07/26/2018 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 283.51 0.00 283.51 AP 00392756 07/26/2018 FORD OF UPLAND INC 184.87 0.00 184.87 AP 00392757 07/26/2018 GALLS LLC. 0.00 1,239.77 1,239.77 AP 00392758 07/26/2018 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 2,862.41 0.00 2,862.41 AP 00392759 07/26/2018 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 13,048.30 0.00 13,048.30 AP 00392760 07/26/2018 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 1,035.00 0.00 1,035.00 AP 00392761 07/26/2018 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 513.85 0.00 513.85 AP 00392762 07/26/2018 MINUTEMAN PRESS 175.88 0.00 175.88 AP 00392763 07/26/2018 OFFICE DEPOT 8,014.56 0.00 8,014.56 AP 00392764 07/26/2018 ORKIN PEST CONTROL 918.00 0.00 918.00 AP 00392765 07/26/2018 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS 868.41 0.00 868.41 AP 00392766 07/26/2018 VISTA PAINT 107.01 0.00 107.01 AP 00392767 07/26/2018 LITTLE MEDICAL SCHOOL 7,389.00 0.00 7,389.00 AP 00392768 08/01/2018 ACEY DECY EQUIPMENT INC. 138.93 0.00 138.93 AP 00392769 08/01/2018 AFLAC GROUP INSURANCE 40.97 0.00 40.97 AP 00392770 08/01/2018 AGE -FREE, SERENA 125.54 0.00 125.54 AP 00392771 08/01/2018 ALL CITIES TOOLS 134.69 1,765.49 1,900.18 *** AP 00392772 08/01/2018 ALLERGY & ASTHMA CENTER 816.19 0.00 816.19 AP 00392773 08/01/2018 ALLIANCE BUS LINES INC 2,554.83 0.00 2,554.83 AP 00392774 08/01/2018 AMERICAN TRAINING RESOURCES INC 1,079.91 0.00 1,079.91 AP 00392775 08/01/2018 AMERON POLE PRODUCTS LLC 47,772.43 0.00 47,772.43 AP 00392776 08/01/2018 APPLIED CONCEPTS 219.34 0.00 219.34 AP 00392777 08/01/2018 AUTO AND RV SPECIALISTS INC. 76.34 0.00 76.34 AP 00392778 08/01/2018 AVILA, ROSY 425.00 0.00 425.00 AP 00392779 08/01/2018 BiCOASTAL PRODUCTIONS 2,790.00 0.00 2,790.00 AP 00392780 08/01/2018 BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERVICES INC. 329.46 0.00 329.46 AP 00392781 08/01/2018 BROOKS, THERESA 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00392782 08/01/2018 BSN SPORTS LLC 3,316.87 0.00 3,316.87 AP 00392783 08/01/2018 BUD FORREST ENTERTAINMENT INC. 7,500.00 0.00 7,500.00 AP 00392784 08/01/2018 BUSINESS MANAGEMENT DAILY 139.00 0.00 139.00 AP 00392785 08/01/2018 CAL PERS LONG TERM CARE 254.14 0.00 254.14 AP 00392786 08/01/2018 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 312.88 0.00 312.88 AP 00392787 08/01/2018 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 100.00 0.00 100.00 AP 00392788 08/01/2018 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 8.44 0.00 8.44 AP 00392789 08/01/2018 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 301.05 0.00 301.05 AP 00392790 08/01/2018 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 1,318.48 0.00 1,318.48 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 7 Current Date: 08/08/2018 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:27:11 Page 17 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 7/24/2018 through 8/7/2018 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00392791 08/01/2018 CANTOR, DOUGLAS 24.95 0.00 24.95 AP 00392792 08/01/2018 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 327.63 0.00 327.63 AP 00392793 08/01/2018 CHAMPION AWARDS AND SPECIALTIES 58.19 0.00 58.19 AP 00392794 08/01/2018 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 9,304.46 4,370.12 13,674.58 *** AP 00392795 08/01/2018 CHIKEZIEOJO, NGOZI 55.99 0.00 55.99 AP 00392796 08/01/2018 CHONG, JUDY 28.02 0.00 28.02 AP 00392797 08/01/2018 CINTAS CORPORATION #150 1,065.93 169.58 1,235.51 *** AP 00392798 08/01/2018 COMMERCIAL DOOR 427.50 0.00 427.50 AP 00392799 08/01/2018 CPRS 165.00 0.00 165.00 AP 00392800 08/01/2018 CRP OAKMONT INDUST. PROPERTIES LLC 15,000.00 0.00 15,000.00 AP 00392801 08/01/2018 DANIELS TIRE SERVICE 0.00 1,850.46 1,850.46 AP 00392802 08/01/2018 EASY PARTY RENTALS 397.50 0.00 397.50 AP 00392803 08/01/2018 EDUCATIONAL CREDIT MANAGEMENT CORP. 5.00 0.00 5.00 AP 00392804 08/01/2018 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 60.00 0.00 60.00 AP 00392805 08/01/2018 ENVIROMET 0.00 1,999.00 1,999.00 AP 00392806 08/01/2018 EXPRESS BRAKE SUPPLY 601.53 0.00 601.53 AP 00392807 08/01/2018 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS 0.00 1,044.78 1,044.78 AP 00392808 08/01/2018 FRANKLIN TRUCK PARTS 0.00 4,424.29 4,424.29 AP 00392809 08/01/2018 FRONTIER COMM 3,240.55 550.63 3,791.18 *** AP 00392810 08/01/2018 FRONTIER COMM 1,458.12 0.00 1,458.12 AP 00392811 08/01/2018 GLOBALSTAR USA 170.64 0.00 170.64 AP 00392812 08/01/2018 GOLDEN STATE RISK MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY 90,544.00 1,362.00 91,906.00 *** AP 00392813 08/01/2018 GRAINGER 1,560.60 396.37 1,956.97 *** AP 00392814 08/01/2018 GUTIERREZ, KRISTINA 421.25 0.00 421.25 AP 00392815 08/01/2018 HI WAY SAFETY INC 59.39 0.00 59.39 AP 00392816 08/01/2018 HIRED GUN EXTERMINATING INC 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00392817 08/01/2018 HODGSON, ROBERT F. 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00392818 08/01/2018 HSH-RANCHO OWNER CA LLC 176.15 0.00 176.15 AP 00392819 08/01/2018 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 304.68 0.00 304.68 AP 00392820 08/01/2018 INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CRIME ANALYSTS 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00392821 08/01/2018 INTERNET CENTRICS LLC 0.00 619.40 619.40 AP 00392822 08/01/2018 J J KELLER AND ASSOC INC 995.00 0.00 995.00 AP 00392823 08/01/2018 JIN, YAN 226.96 0.00 226.96 AP 00392824 08/01/2018 JOHNNY ALLEN TENNIS ACADEMY 571.20 0.00 571.20 AP 00392825 08/01/2018 JOHNSON, MARSHA HEDRICK- 60.92 0.00 60.92 AP 00392826 08/01/2018 JOUD CONSTRUCTION COMPANY INC 6.00 0.00 6.00 AP 00392827 08/01/2018 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INC 249,110.50 0.00 249,110.50 AP 00392828 08/01/2018 KEITH, JORRY 492.00 0.00 492.00 AP 00392829 08/01/2018 KINDRED CORPORATION 26,319.94 0.00 26,319.94 AP 00392830 08/01/2018 KIRO CARS INC 540.00 0.00 540.00 AP 00392831 08/01/2018 LEIGHTON CONSULTING INC 10,195.00 0.00 10,195.00 AP 00392832 08/01/2018 LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC. 8,222.32 0.00 8,222.32 AP 00392833 08/01/2018 LOPEZ, ANGEL 200.00 0.00 200.00 AP 00392834 08/01/2018 LORD, OLIN S 352.00 0.00 352.00 AP 00392835 08/01/2018 MAIN STREET SIGNS 247.83 0.00 247.83 AP 00392836 08/01/2018 MAYHORN, CHERYL 250.00 0.00 250.00 AP 00392837 08/01/2018 MIDWEST TAPE 245.85 0.00 245.85 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 8 Current Date: 08/08/2018 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:27:11 Page 18 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 7/24/2018 through 8/7/2018 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00392838 08/01/2018 MOLINER, ERICKA 250.00 0.00 250.00 AP 00392839 08/01/2018 MUNOZ, CLAUDIA L 240.00 0.00 240.00 AP 00392840 08/01/2018 MUTUAL PROPANE 0.00 20.00 20.00 AP 00392841 08/01/2018 MYERS TIRE SUPPLY COMPANY 0.00 27.33 27.33 AP 00392842 08/01/2018 NAPA AUTO PARTS 5.38 2,213.71 2,219.09 *** AP 00392843 08/01/2018 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION 759.32 0.00 759.32 AP 00392844 08/01/2018 NEOPOST USA INC 452.69 0.00 452.69 AP 00392845 08/01/2018 NETFILE 12,600.00 0.00 12,600.00 AP 00392846 08/01/2018 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CTRS OF CA 0.00 372.98 372.98 AP 00392847 08/01/2018 ONTARIO, CITY OF 0.00 25,000.00 25,000.00 AP 00392848 08/01/2018 ORTIZ, IRENE 25.00 0.00 25.00 AP 00392849 08/01/2018 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 695.92 0.00 695.92 AP 00392850 08/01/2018 PINA, RAFAEL 425.00 0.00 425.00 AP 00392851 08/01/2018 PLANETBIDS INC 17,730.00 0.00 17,730.00 AP 00392852 08/01/2018 PRE -PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 78.38 0.00 78.38 AP 00392853 08/01/2018 PRIME GLASS 271.53 0.00 271.53 AP 00392854 08/01/2018 RANCHO SMOG CENTER 599.25 0.00 599.25 AP 00392855 08/01/2018 RICHARD WIGHTMAN CONSTRUCTION INC 8,000.00 0.00 8,000.00 AP 00392856 08/01/2018 RICHARD WIGHTMAN CONSTRUCTION INC 4,420.00 0.00 4,420.00 AP 00392857 08/01/2018 RICHARD WIGHTMAN CONSTRUCTION INC 14,920.00 0.00 14,920.00 AP 00392858 08/01/2018 RICHARD WIGHTMAN CONSTRUCTION INC 7,720.00 0.00 7,720.00 AP 00392859 08/01/2018 RICHARD WIGHTMAN CONSTRUCTION INC 6,000.00 0.00 6,000.00 AP 00392860 08/01/2018 RODAS' AUTO REPAIR 2,948.98 0.00 2,948.98 AP 00392861 08/01/2018 ROTARY CLUB OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 223.25 0.00 223.25 AP 00392862 08/01/2018 ROYAL INDUSTRIAL SOLUTIONS CITY OF INDUSTRY 418.32 0.00 418.32 AP 00392863 08/01/2018 SAN BERNARDINO CTY AUDITOR CONTROLLER 29,485.55 0.00 29,485.55 AP 00392864 08/01/2018 SBPEA 1,619.05 0.00 1,619.05 AP 00392865 08/01/2018 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO, THE 65.58 0.00 65.58 AP 00392866 08/01/2018 SIGN SHOP, THE 0.00 131.20 131.20 AP 00392867 08/01/2018 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 5,890.56 124.67 6,015.23 *** AP 00392868 08/01/2018 SONSRAY MACHINERY LLC 2,424.42 0.00 2,424.42 AP 00392869 08/01/2018 SOUTH COAST AQMD 0.00 1,220.37 1,220.37 AP 00392875 08/01/2018 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 10,047.69 4,301.99 14,349.68 *** AP 00392876 08/01/2018 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.97 0.00 17.97 AP 00392877 08/01/2018 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2,133.18 0.00 2,133.18 AP 00392878 08/01/2018 STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY 4,111.61 0.00 4,111.61 AP 00392879 08/01/2018 SWEET DOUGH CAFE 990.00 0.00 990.00 AP 00392880 08/01/2018 SWIFTY SIGN 0.00 360.00 360.00 AP 00392881 08/01/2018 TEXAS MEDICAL SCREENING LLC 445.00 0.00 445.00 AP 00392882 08/01/2018 TIREHUB LLC 1,004.36 0.00 1,004.36 AP 00392883 08/01/2018 TORO TOWING 100.00 0.00 100.00 AP 00392884 08/01/2018 TRIMMER, PATRICIA A 195.86 0.00 195.86 AP 00392885 08/01/2018 UNITED SITE SERVICES OF CA INC 281.34 0.00 281.34 AP 00392886 08/01/2018 UNITED WAY 93.00 0.00 93.00 AP 00392887 08/01/2018 UPLAND AUTO TRIM 250.00 0.00 250.00 AP 00392888 08/01/2018 UPS 81.37 0.00 81.37 AP 00392889 08/01/2018 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 2,955.81 0.00 2,955.81 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 9 Current Date: 08/08/2018 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:27:11 Page 19 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 7/24/2018 through 8/7/2018 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00392890 08/01/2018 WILSON & BELL AUTO SERVICE 0.00 105.00 105.00 AP 00392891 08/01/2018 WINZER CORPORATION 0.00 194.09 194.09 AP 00392892 08/01/2018 YERO, ART 14.82 0.00 14.82 AP 00392893 08/01/2018 YOUNG REMBRANDTS 1,029.60 0.00 1,029.60 AP 00392894 08/01/2018 A & M FIRST AID INC 814.48 0.00 814.48 AP 00392895 08/01/2018 ABLE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 2,007.95 0.00 2,007.95 AP 00392896 08/01/2018 ALFARO COMMUNICATIONS CONSTRUCTION INC 39,786.00 0.00 39,786.00 AP 00392897 08/01/2018 ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT 167,599.64 0.00 167,599.64 AP 00392898 08/01/2018 ALLIANCE BUS LINES INC 799.20 0.00 799.20 AP 00392899 08/01/2018 ALLIED UNIVERSAL SECURITY SERVICES 2,672.14 0.00 2,672.14 AP 00392900 08/01/2018 APPLE INC. 772.35 0.00 772.35 AP 00392901 08/01/2018 BARTEL ASSOCIATES LLC 0.00 9,135.00 9,135.00 AP 00392902 08/01/2018 BEST BEST AND KRIEGER 357.50 0.00 357.50 AP 00392903 08/01/2018 BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERVICES INC. 37,222.32 0.00 37,222.32 AP 00392904 08/01/2018 BSN SPORTS LLC 892.11 0.00 892.11 AP 00392905 08/01/2018 BUREAU VERITAS NORTH AMERICA INC 16,895.63 0.00 16,895.63 AP 00392906 08/01/2018 BUTSKO UTILITY DESIGN INC. 27,948.87 0.00 27,948.87 AP 00392907 08/01/2018 C V W D 1,123.71 0.00 1,123.71 AP 00392911 08/01/2018 C V W D 119,584.92 0.00 119,584.92 AP 00392912 08/01/2018 CALIFORNIA SHOPPING CART RETRIEVAL CORP 140.00 0.00 140.00 AP 00392913 08/01/2018 CCS ORANGE COUNTY JANITORIAL INC. 1,547.92 645.00 2,192.92 *** AP 00392914 08/01/2018 CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT 7,913.00 0.00 7,913.00 AP 00392915 08/01/2018 CHINO MOWER AND ENGINE SERVICE 1,486.80 0.00 1,486.80 AP 00392916 08/01/2018 CLARKE PLUMBING SPECIALTIES INC. 633.26 15.42 648.68 *** AP 00392917 08/01/2018 COMMUNITY BANK 8,821.03 0.00 8,821.03 AP 00392918 08/01/2018 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTR INC 134.47 0.00 134.47 AP 00392919 08/01/2018 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 32,528.39 0.00 32,528.39 AP 00392920 08/01/2018 D & D SERVICES INC. 860.00 0.00 860.00 AP 00392921 08/01/2018 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 435.31 0.00 435.31 AP 00392922 08/01/2018 DATA TICKET INC 1,364.20 0.00 1,364.20 AP 00392923 08/01/2018 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 7,997.31 0.00 7,997.31 AP 00392924 08/01/2018 DEPENDABLE COMPANY INC. 23.75 0.00 23.75 AP 00392925 08/01/2018 ENNIS PAINT INC. 1,454.63 0.00 1,454.63 AP 00392926 08/01/2018 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 99.23 0.00 99.23 AP 00392927 08/01/2018 FORTIN LAW GROUP 10,139.69 0.00 10,139.69 AP 00392928 08/01/2018 FUEL SERV 6,494.50 0.00 6,494.50 AP 00392929 08/01/2018 GLADWELL GOVERNMENT SERVICES 4,800.00 0.00 4,800.00 AP 00392930 08/01/2018 GRAINGER 646.69 255.76 902.45 *** AP 00392931 08/01/2018 GRIFFIN STRUCTURES INC 18,333.14 0.00 18,333.14 AP 00392932 08/01/2018 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO 2,359.73 0.00 2,359.73 AP 00392933 08/01/2018 HDL SOFTWARE LLC. 1,500.00 0.00 1,500.00 AP 00392934 08/01/2018 HEARTSAVERS LLC 25.00 0.00 25.00 AP 00392935 08/01/2018 IBM CORPORATION 2,803.08 0.00 2,803.08 AP 00392936 08/01/2018 ICE DATA PRICING AND REFERENCE DATA LLC 133.85 0.00 133.85 AP 00392937 08/01/2018 INDEPENDENT ROOFING CONSULTANTS 3,500.00 0.00 3,500.00 AP 00392938 08/01/2018 INTERWEST CONSULTING GROUP INC 360.00 0.00 360.00 AP 00392939 08/01/2018 KIRO CARS INC 180.00 0.00 180.00 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 10 Current Date: 08/08/2018 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:27:11 Page 20 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 7/24/2018 through 8/7/2018 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00392940 08/01/2018 KVAC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES INC 1,158.50 0.00 1,158.50 AP 00392941 08/01/2018 LANDCARE USA LLC 45,275.74 0.00 45,275.74 AP 00392942 08/01/2018 LEIGHTON CONSULTING INC 8,550.80 0.00 8,550.80 AP 00392943 08/01/2018 LIBERTY PLUGINS INC 1,080.00 72.00 1,152.00 *** AP 00392944 08/01/2018 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 3,000.00 0.00 3,000.00 AP 00392945 08/01/2018 MARIPOSA LANDSCAPES INC 111,209.17 0.00 111,209.17 AP 00392946 08/01/2018 MASON AND MASON REAL ESTATE APPRAISERS 8,535.43 0.00 8,535.43 AP 00392947 08/01/2018 MATLOCK DESIGN BUILD INC 3,232.50 0.00 3,232.50 AP 00392948 08/01/2018 MEDLEY FIRE PROTECTION INC 0.00 2,763.40 2,763.40 AP 00392949 08/01/2018 MIDWEST TAPE 89.98 0.00 89.98 AP 00392950 08/01/2018 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CTRS OF CA 1,084.33 0.00 1,084.33 AP 00392951 08/01/2018 OCLC INC 55.45 0.00 55.45 AP 00392952 08/01/2018 ONTARIO WINNELSON CO 52.43 0.00 52.43 AP 00392953 08/01/2018 PAPE GROUP INC, THE 1,451.64 0.00 1,451.64 AP 00392954 08/01/2018 PRESTWICK GROUP INC, THE 4,121.83 0.00 4,121.83 AP 00392955 08/01/2018 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FONTANA FAMILY YMCA 15,580.76 0.00 15,580.76 AP 00392956 08/01/2018 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTOR 331.57 0.00 331.57 AP 00392957 08/01/2018 ROTO ROOTER 565.00 0.00 565.00 AP 00392958 08/01/2018 ROYAL INDUSTRIAL SOLUTIONS CITY OF INDUSTRY 8.85 0.00 8.85 AP 00392959 08/01/2018 SAN BERNARDINO CTY 0.00 11,297.00 11,297.00 AP 00392960 08/01/2018 SC FUELS 0.00 2,898.13 2,898.13 AP 00392961 08/01/2018 SHEAKLEY PENSION ADMINISTRATION 0.00 175.65 175.65 AP 00392962 08/01/2018 SHEAKLEY PENSION ADMINISTRATION 390.70 0.00 390.70 AP 00392963 08/01/2018 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 14.79 0.00 14.79 AP 00392964 08/01/2018 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2,489.37 0.00 2,489.37 AP 00392965 08/01/2018 THE COUNSELING TEAM INTERNATIONAL 0.00 840.00 840.00 AP 00392966 08/01/2018 THOMPSON PLUMBING SUPPLY INC 489.46 0.00 489.46 AP 00392967 08/01/2018 TOMCO LLC 6,150.00 0.00 6,150.00 AP 00392968 08/01/2018 U C REGENTS 5,495.24 0.00 5,495.24 AP 00392969 08/01/2018 U S LEGAL SUPPORT INC 226.43 0.00 226.43 AP 00392970 08/01/2018 UTILIQUEST 1,230.32 0.00 1,230.32 AP 00392971 08/01/2018 UTILITY FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS 7,245.00 0.00 7,245.00 AP 00392972 08/01/2018 VAN SCOYOC ASSOCIATES INC 4,000.00 0.00 4,000.00 AP 00392973 08/01/2018 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 101.35 0.00 101.35 AP 00392974 08/01/2018 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 120.24 0.00 120.24 AP 00392975 08/01/2018 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 1,059.59 0.00 1,059.59 AP 00392976 08/01/2018 WEST END MATERIAL SUPPLY 258.60 0.00 258.60 AP 00392977 08/01/2018 WHITTIER FERTILIZER 932.04 0.00 932.04 AP 00392978 08/02/2018 ABC LOCKSMITHS 286.32 0.00 286.32 AP 00392979 08/02/2018 CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO INC 250.37 81.78 332.15 *** AP 00392980 08/02/2018 DEMCOINC 147.23 0.00 147.23 AP 00392981 08/02/2018 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 46.03 0.00 46.03 AP 00392982 08/02/2018 GALE/CENGAGE LEARNING 2,753.69 0.00 2,753.69 AP 00392983 08/02/2018 HOSE MAN INC 0.00 130.42 130.42 AP 00392984 08/02/2018 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 113.24 0.00 113.24 AP 00392985 08/02/2018 MINUTEMAN PRESS 195.03 0.00 195.03 AP 00392986 08/02/2018 OFFICE DEPOT 1,395.56 691.94 2,087.50 *** User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 11 Current Date: 08/08/2018 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:27:11 Page 21 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 7/24/2018 through 8/7/2018 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00392987 08/02/2018 ORKIN PEST CONTROL 0.00 200.00 200.00 AP 00392988 08/02/2018 SUNRISE FORD 1,868.28 0.00 1,868.28 AP 00392989 08/02/2018 ASSI SECURITY 26,700.25 0.00 26,700.25 AP 00392990 08/02/2018 ALLIANT INSURANCE SERVICES INC. 3,604.00 0.00 3,604.00 AP 00392998 08/02/2018 BRODART BOOKS 38,114.66 0.00 38,114.66 AP 00392999 08/02/2018 EMCOR SERVICE 13,245.00 0.00 13,245.00 AP 00393000 08/02/2018 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 4,011.66 0.00 4,011.66 AP 00393001 08/02/2018 KME FIRE APPARATUS 0.00 520.27 520.27 AP 00393002 08/02/2018 OFFICE DEPOT 303.57 0.00 303.57 AP 00393003 08/02/2018 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 613.23 0.00 613.23 Total City: $7,014,477.39 Total Fire: $437,882.09 Grand Total: $7,452,33T48 Note: *** Check Number includes both City and Fire District expenditures User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 12 Current Date: 08/08/2018 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:27:11 Page 22 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Electronic Debit Register July 1, 2018 - July 31, 2018 DATE DESCRIPTION CITY FIRE AMOUNT 7/2 WIRE TRANSFER - To California ISO 205.72 205.72 7/2 WORKERS COMP - City Account Transfer 837.39 837.39 7/2 WORKERS COMP - Fire Account Transfer 638.40 638.40 7/3 WORKERS COMP - City Account Transfer 107.57 107.57 7/3 WORKERS COMP - Fire Account Transfer 7,418.74 7,418.74 7/5 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 1,621.14 1,621.14 7/5 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 1,918.51 1,918.51 7/5 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 5,520.40 5,520.40 7/5 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 7,781.99 7,781.99 7/5 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 10,919.73 10,919.73 7/5 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 103,689.48 103,689.48 7/5 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT - Child Support Payments 2,465.15 2,465.15 7/5 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT - Child Support Payments 3,584.44 3,584.44 7/5 U.S. BANK - Purchasing Card Payment - June 2018 74,120.42 14,081.70 88,202.12 7/5 U.S. BANK - Corporate Card Payment - June 2018 91,984.81 21,928.59 113,913.40 7/5 U.S. BANK - Costco Card Payment - June 2018 1,145.98 150.32 1,296.30 7/5 WORKERS COMP - City Account Transfer 2,099.48 2,099.48 7/5 WORKERS COMP - Fire Account Transfer 499.81 499.81 7/6 WORKERS COMP - City Account Transfer 36.00 36.00 7/6 WORKERS COMP - Fire Account Transfer 197.90 197.90 7/9 CALPERS - City - Retirement Account Deposit 41,096.16 41,096.16 7/9 CALPERS - City - Retirement Account Deposit 125,431.42 125,431.42 7/9 WIRE TRANSFER - To California ISO 82,315.99 82,315.99 7/9 WORKERS COMP - City Account Transfer 493.59 493.59 7/9 WORKERS COMP - Fire Account Transfer 437.07 437.07 7/10 WORKERS COMP - City Account Transfer 198.08 198.08 7/10 WORKERS COMP - Fire Account Transfer 1,278.51 1,278.51 7/11 WORKERS COMP - City Account Transfer 114.64 114.64 7/11 WORKERS COMP - Fire Account Transfer 111.53 111.53 7/12 WORKERS COMP - City Account Transfer 390.00 390.00 7/13 WORKERS COMP - City Account Transfer 785.30 785.30 7/16 WIRE TRANSFER - To California ISO 7,984.98 7,984.98 7/16 WORKERS COMP - City Account Transfer 809.87 809.87 7/16 WORKERS COMP - Fire Account Transfer 7,087.54 7,087.54 7/17 WORKERS COMP - CityAccountTransfer 1,194.47 1,194.47 7/18 WORKERS COMP - City Account Transfer 5,024.77 5,024.77 7/19 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT - Child Support Payments 2,465.15 2,465.15 7/19 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT - Child Support Payments 5,418.28 5,418.28 7/19 WORKERS COMP - City Account Transfer 406.66 406.66 7/19 WORKERS COMP - Fire Account Transfer 140.82 140.82 7/20 WORKERS COMP - City Account Transfer 3,852.05 3,852.05 7/20 WORKERS COMP - Fire Account Transfer 4,665.97 4,665.97 7/23 WORKERS COMP - City Account Transfer 15.60 15.60 7/24 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 138,857.58 138,857.58 7/24 CALPERS - City - Retirement Account Deposit 39,000.00 39,000.00 7/24 CALPERS - City - Retirement Account Deposit 119,202.00 119,202.00 7/24 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 1,000.00 1,000.00 7/24 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 1,800.00 1,800.00 7/24 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 5,000.00 5,000.00 7/24 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 7,000.00 7,000.00 7/24 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 9,000.00 9,000.00 7/24 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 101,000.00 101,000.00 7/24 WORKERS COMP - City Account Transfer 220.80 220.80 7/24 WORKERS COMP - Fire Account Transfer 550.56 550.56 7/25 CALPERS - City - Retirement Account Deposit 3,504.80 3,504.80 7/25 CALPERS - City - Retirement Account Deposit 13,780.00 13,780.00 7/25 CALPERS - City - Retirement Account Deposit 17,352.40 17,352.40 7/25 CALPERS - City - Retirement Account Deposit 2,757,041.00 2,757,041.00 7/25 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 306.80 306.80 1 Page 23 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Electronic Debit Register July 1, 2018 - July 31, 2018 DATE DESCRIPTION CITY FIRE AMOUNT 7/25 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 389.00 389.00 7/25 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 406.00 406.00 7/25 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 452.40 452.40 7/25 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 468.00 468.00 7/25 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 618.80 618.80 7/25 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 837.20 837.20 7/25 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 839.00 839.00 7/25 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 1,369.00 1,369.00 7/25 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 4,461.60 4,461.60 7/25 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 140,453.00 140,453.00 7/25 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 1,761,308.00 1,761,308.00 7/25 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 395.44 395.44 7/25 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 654.41 654.41 7/25 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 672.28 672.28 7/25 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 1,014.25 1,014.25 7/25 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 2,222.08 2,222.08 7/25 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 6,149.73 6,149.73 7/25 WORKERS COMP - City Account Transfer 983.33 983.33 7/25 WORKERS COMP - Fire Account Transfer 7,777.16 7,777.16 7/26 WORKERS COMP - CityAccountTransfer 1,040.80 1,040.80 7/26 WORKERS COMP - Fire Account Transfer 1,266.06 1,266.06 7/27 WORKERS COMP - City Account Transfer 133.37 133.37 7/27 WORKERS COMP - Fire Account Transfer 1,551.61 1,551.61 7/30 WIRE TRANSFER - To California ISO 5,038.72 5,038.72 7/30 WORKERS COMP - City Account Transfer 28,912.00 28,912.00 7/30 WORKERS COMP - Fire Account Transfer 5,930.21 5,930.21 7/31 U.S. BANK - Purchasing Card Payment - July 2018 63,019.07 9,992.93 73,012.00 7/31 U.S. BANK - Corporate Card Payment - July 2018 92,524.46 13,753.20 106,277.66 7/31 U.S. BANK - Costco Card Payment - July 2018 771.71 323.17 1,094.88 TOTAL CITY 3,588,105.71 TOTAL FIRE 2,426,910.34 GRAND TOTAL 6,015,016.05 Page 24 DATE: August 15, 2018 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services INITIATED BY: Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director Sandra G. Ramirez, Manag e me nt A nalyst III SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE CURRENT INVESTMENT SCHEDULE AS OF JULY 31, 2018. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the President and Members of the Board of Directors receive and file the attached current investment schedule for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District as of July 31, 2018. BACKGROUND: The attached investment schedule as of July 31, 2018 reflects cash and investments managed by the Finance/Treasury Management Division and is in conformity with the requirements of California Government Code Section 53601 and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District's adopted Investment Policy as approved by the President and Members of the Board of Directors on April 17, 2017. ANALYSIS: The District's Treasurer is required to submit a quarterly investment report to the President and Members of the Board of Directors in accordance with California Government Code Section 53646. The quarterly investment report is required to be submitted within 30 days following the end of the quarter covered by the report. However, the District Treasurer has elected to provide this report on a monthly basis. FISCAL IMPACT: None COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: N/A Page 25 ATTACHMENTS: Description Attachment 1 - Portfolio Management - Portfolio Summary July 31, 2018 Page 26 JI0 N O O co a c ii o a va s W 0 0 0 rn M a N N t0 CD Wto 7n w 3 M H r� r.- CO M W� 07 M O W leo rn v, 10 0? N - N M u m CO N I b a 1 I Cq N OR, ao v A"S, o O O b O— n N l 0 O 0 O O 07 O CO O CO O O fz O 007N O O 007 N v CO O 70 CO w O 0 M O O CO O m O O O lh O 1n N O W NO O O CO O N W N LL cN0 W N CO O co CD w r 0 O c0 O O O CO O m9 O O C O CO a 0 0 N O O O 000 N a O a N V O O b 0 to v r N N O co r A co N s� cm N N A w N ui N N p a c a a S c LL M 7 O d 00 c� U 0 E Q U E rn N C N 0 c v o V y 0 c C 3 Q CO m n N Q t� -0 RX' c -i U a LL H o y Q co 0 L LL d 0 •• o ai c E O a 12 m E a a m 0 c M O a C • O U E 0 L C N E Nl 7 C C N O � am E <'M I� y L N O r X ,= y d Q C M E w 0 C ;6 ars .§a o > c� N L y eL. L_ •3 � O o 0 C y �o a t ,v_7 c y N Z �a N N C y E C M.0 ' N >Ea C N C N O " 00 a o CL c EL d 0 .y EO � > O M c N ti = ti ~ L o N ' N C C r M N — E O .yT t0 O 0 aZ-- 8 8 E N O r O tw 0� O U 'O CL •Z c ago) o 'O0 > O 0 C o �+ N y cm y 3 U ;E C y �E2 t! °a 0 Q > C m �ag`6 27 r f d1 m a si L � a m 7 N m N c O O N O O W O O O N O W O O O CD O N N O O W O O O N N N N N N N N N N N N O N W G. O O O o0 0 0o O o0 0 0o O oo O oo O o0 N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 U) Q N N m m M O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O m M M W a O� V' V' m 0 m 0 0 n m m n 07 M M O 95 � n (L ' �o O O N N N M M M N N N N N N N N M a000000o�0�oa���a � O j al O O O M O O O O O M O O O 0 0 Q 0 O M O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o N O M M ct 0 0 O M M O_ O Lq M O o w o LL r O r N �Op O I V I t I O U O N� V O� m ( mp N M m W M r O aMD I� n a n m O d m I Y! a I M y m m C' N N tD m W M m O N S -V N a OD M d o N N C Oc a.10 v}i a to O 0 = O S pp m pad 7 n t0 N N � ems CR � VV: Ol N N M N COD O U� � U� N N M. Ci 't r b N N N N I CV O I O .- .- N N N �- °' m m m m m m m m m f0 m m m m m m m co m m m m m Q ¢ ¢ `� `� `aD `¢° Q `� `� `� `¢° l4 Q LO LO N N C5 C O O O O O O O M M pOH N N V 00 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O Ow M m n NIOM M N o 0 0 0 W O O O O O O O N m M m M M Of N N M N m O M M M m m O co m O co CD W O O O O W M m O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 o O O Il Co a CO 0 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 O o 0 0 00 N m 0 O o M m m 0 0 0 O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O CO 0 O O m V' O 0 0 0 O O O o Ct Ct Ct CL Ct 0 CL C N O O O a 0w W O o 0 O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 00 M O o 0 0 00 O M O 0 0 0 0 0 0 OD O M O O V' CD 'tM O O O O M M O O M M o O M O O. N N .- N N N N N N N N N —— N N N— M 10 O O O O O O O m O O O O O O O M O O O O O O O H M N 00 M M V' m o O N O M m 0 n f0 w n N N O N N O V: ClM COM n M m M m M t0 C r O W M r NO Oct N co n m co O (h N co co m O N V• M Ol W M CD oWN m M M M m M n n n n M M V: 0 0 V M W N 07 O W W O v V W W V: Ol m O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 roj oo O o0 0 0o O o0 0 0o O oo O oo O o0 O LL 0 6 0 0 0 o c o 0 0 0 c o o 0 0 0 0 c o 0 0 0 M O O O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O o O O O O C O O O O O O O 0 ct Ct O O O N O O 0 0 0 O O M 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N OD O O O M O O O O O M O O O 0 0 Q 0 O M O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o N O M M ct 0 0 O M M O_ O Lq M O o w o LL N- N N .- .- N N N N N N N N N —— .- N N N— M Y QZ O LL m m J C) O S J LL Y O O I V I t I P Z U CII mZ Y d a a z a o N N C Oc a.10 v}i m to O 0 = O W N M M m m m n m m m m n n m m m n n M M M M m m O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N a 0 M M Ol a W M M O O m O O n o m n W O 1n M O N M N N O N N N C\ (\ (\ f12 N (\ N N N M N N f�1 m o � 0 00 0 0 00 0 — 0 0 00 0 00 0 an. aaa zIt w wIr Y Y Y Y Y Y 00000 Z Q Z Z Z Z QZ Y Y Y Y Y Y U U U U U m m m m CO Q Q Q Q Q Q !N y co co y co t t F H m m m m m m no 0 60 0 z z z z z z z z z z z Q Q Q Q a Q WS WS W0 W0 W0 W Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q 000 Vr O O 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 O O O U U U 00 U J J J J J J J J J J J 0:S jr SS H FH QQQQQQOOOOOOOOOOOQQ� LL LL LL LL LL LL 2 2 2 2 2 S 2 2 S 2 S Z Z qJ qJ QJ QJ qJ QJ qJ QJ QJ QJ 4J J qJ qJ QJ QJ J qJ QJ qJ QJ qJ 4J w W W W W w W W W W w W w W w W w W w W w W w W W W W W W W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w w w w w w W w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL C O CL O VO m M m n CD n m 0 N N M OM n M n 0) m V' I, n m m 00 m 0) w O O m m w o O m n n n m w O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 N V C m Q °' }NN coNN- 2 M a M W =) >> o > o N a co V 00 O � O SgM Y w S m 2 S M> N O LL to g d i V' W U' w co O S W LL LL LL 0 2 n m O W Q m m W Q Q N O N N M CO q W W W W W W Q Q Q Q Q Q U (7 (7 (9 (7 0 (7 () 0 (7 a MM M M M M O O O O O O V' st V N m M m m m m O M M M M M M M M M M M M l'O fO M M M M M M {L M M co M M M M M M co M CO M M M M !7 M M M M m M Ma M N 0 m Pam 28 N mO 3 O C) O a Y O I V I t I O (.i a 0 OTO F o N N V mis a.10 v}i M M m m m n m m m m n n m m m n n M M M M m m O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N a 0 M M Ol a W M M O O m O O n o m n W O 1n M O N M N N O N N N C\ (\ (\ f12 N (\ N N N M N N f�1 m o � 0 00 0 0 00 0 — 0 0 00 0 00 0 an. aaa zIt w wIr Y Y Y Y Y Y 00000 Z Q Z Z Z Z QZ Y Y Y Y Y Y U U U U U m m m m CO Q Q Q Q Q Q !N y co co y co t t F H m m m m m m no 0 60 0 z z z z z z z z z z z Q Q Q Q a Q WS WS W0 W0 W0 W Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q 000 Vr O O 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 O O O U U U 00 U J J J J J J J J J J J 0:S jr SS H FH QQQQQQOOOOOOOOOOOQQ� LL LL LL LL LL LL 2 2 2 2 2 S 2 2 S 2 S Z Z qJ qJ QJ QJ qJ QJ qJ QJ QJ QJ 4J J qJ qJ QJ QJ J qJ QJ qJ QJ qJ 4J w W W W W w W W W W w W w W w W w W w W w W w W W W W W W W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w w w w w w W w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL C O CL O VO m M m n CD n m 0 N N M OM n M n 0) m V' I, n m m 00 m 0) w O O m m w o O m n n n m w O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 N V C m Q °' }NN coNN- 2 M a M W =) >> o > o N a co V 00 O � O SgM Y w S m 2 S M> N O LL to g d i V' W U' w co O S W LL LL LL 0 2 n m O W Q m m W Q Q N O N N M CO q W W W W W W Q Q Q Q Q Q U (7 (7 (9 (7 0 (7 () 0 (7 a MM M M M M O O O O O O V' st V N m M m m m m O M M M M M M M M M M M M l'O fO M M M M M M {L M M co M M M M M M co M CO M M M M !7 M M M M m M Ma M N 0 m Pam 28 cm k a / { kk a § _ o■ §� CR_ � . f m| �� .| Q| : .| <� cocm cm� _ - @ ■; k id ' C � kl / \ 7 � $ � n� n k / k� j 2 /0) > 2 e CL 7 f C k k \� § g. § 4w ® D ■ . # 8 B @ # § > AA _ } k k k § Cc _k & ■ � k k k nm 2 n $ 0 d 0 ■ — � LL . . 0 i CL § i \ IL § ;C5, o 00 E C I k. k CL 2 § s § z _ §� � �� «z § z e; § ffi g La § k ) k ( § § C Z. ` § m § cc � o: o: � a a CL ;c . §CL o / := k) I ■ �� ( 0 « } fig} E{§ & k k° �§04 '� k G U. G ■ G � a .Ci a act § k Pagb 29 � J C O � 1 II 11 E9 m m Z N O O O D O O co a LL T p a L�+ N a d M u o m n o CM O r V O N jo N O C1, CD V CCD m W CM pOH� N Q coo O o N to . M m � A C O � 1 D 11 E9 m Z N O O O D O O co � yp L �y LL T p a L�+ N a' o d M Z O 0 CL IM W cc H m d w U d •,t O0 �c W CM v a 'r . y _ i � A � 1 D 11 m Z N O O D O O S LL Z F Z W O U LL W J z Q Z _ v E H r r U Z a Q O J o W fOA O E � N a� m ZO Z D N X f%1 N c a O c U. ... Y C c c 0 Q m O 7 0 m C o. V Y N � ate+ t O I C •V o ° � a a a _ L i Li C N U) H a o c m J o } N �d V � A � 1 11 m N N O O 8 O O 0 N N n co aNa �+f O V r N A M m o � N O S Z d' O LL J Q v _ LL E � N a� m ZO Z D N X f%1 N c O ... c c 0 Q o O 7 0 m C o. V Y N ate+ t I C •V o ° � a o y a _ L i Li N U) H 0 N N n co aNa �+f O V r N A M m 4w V .O _N 0 C O V = O .N c0 IL ao L E N LLCiM O O m O 0a U 2 U) Z) Page 31 c a� E w N o- N N 0 c Y C o O CM Lam' o ��rn rn c00 Q �o o v cLiLo 0Q Q y a 2 U) Z) Page 31 L N 0 C C O' V�_ 4D 'L AW w 2.000 ado L ..a, N LL.�M al 0V C va O s c m w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I M M N N O ui O co qq m N } M N N } M E2 m N r N t C 0 2 N U) 0 ai L 2 Q. Page 32 DATE: August 15, 2018 TO: President and Members of the Board of Directors FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Ivan Rojer, Fire Chief Mike McCliman, Deputy Fire Chief Pamela J. Nibert, Management Analyst I I I SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF AN INCREASE TO HMC ARCHITECTS CONTRACT NO. FD 17-003, IN THE AMOUNT OF $339,583, AND APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT NO. 03 FOR ADDITIONAL ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN SERVICES FOR THE CHANGE IN SCOPE FOR THE NEW PUBLIC SAFETY FACILITY, TO INCLUDE THE RELOCATION OF THE SAN BERNARDINO ROAD FIRE STATION (172). RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Fire Board approve an increase to HMC Architects Contract No. FD 17-003, in the amount of $339,583 ($308,713 plus a ten percent (10%) contingency), and approve Amendment No. 03 for additional Architectural Design Services for the change in scope for the New Public Safety Facility, to include the relocation of the San Bernardino Road Fire Station (172). BACKGROUND: A Fire Board strategic plan goal since 2005 has been to replace the original Cucamonga Fire Department Station (172), built in 1954, with a modern station containing up-to-date and appropriate infrastructure for the modern all-risk fire service, on the west side of the city. HMC Architects was awarded the contract for Architectural Services for the project on April 5, 2017. The original plan was to relocate the San Bernardino Road Station (172), including a small substation for the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department. During initial pre -design meetings with stakeholders from across City departments, it was determined that the original vision for the project had to expand in -order to meet the current and future needs of our Sherriff partners. This expansion will provide a fully functioning community based facility on the west side of the city. That change resulted in Amendment No. 01 to the contract. Amendment No. 02 was a slight increase to the contract based upon certain time sensitive documents needed for the east side(VG) Sherriff substation. ANALYSIS: During further analysis, it was determined that the size and scope of the Fire Station was greater than was ideally needed to serve the community. Therefore the services included in Amendment No. 03 decrease the size of the Fire Station building. I n -order to maintain the Fire District's objective to be fiscally prudent, while providing premier service, the building was downsized by approximately 1800 sf. This resulted in an increase in architectural services costs, due to the change in the scope of the project. Overall construction Page 33 costs, however, for the project have decreased, resulting in a net savings. Furthermore, the changes provide the Sherriff's Department with the required evidence and equipment storage capacity to meet current and anticipated future legal mandates. Staff has reviewed the proposal for the increase and find it to be in line with the construction cost estimates and changed scope for the project. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds are allocated in the FY 18/19 Budget in the Fire Protection District Capital Fund/Capital Project/San Bernardino Station 172 Relocation Account No. 3288501-5650/1733288. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: The relocation and rebuilding of the San Bernardino Road Fire Station (172) has been a strategic Fire Board goal since 2005. Further, the Council has continuously sought to provide a high level of Sheriff patrol and enforcement throughout the city. The addition of this facility now provides a community based station within the eastern, central, and western areas of the city. This will support the goal for timely, efficient and effective response and enhanced public safety for the community. ATTACHMENTS: Description Attachment 1 -Amendment No. 03, HMC Architects Page 34 ATTACHMENT 1 AMENDMENT NO. 03 to Professional Services Agreement (CO #FD17-003) between HMC Architects (hereinafter "Consultant") and City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter "City") and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (hereinafter the "RCFPD") This Amendment No. 03 will serve to amend the Professional Services Agreement (hereinafter "Agreement"), CO# FD 17-003 to incorporate the following: Increase CO #FD17-003 for additional Architectural Design Services for the change in scope to the original Agreement for the Fire District San Bernardino Road Fire Station (172) Replacement Project (now the Public Safety Facility, including the Station relocation), in accordance with Consultant's Proposal dated June 17, 2018, attached hereto. All other Terms and Conditions of the original Agreement CO# FD 17-003, will remain in full effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties, through their respective authorized representatives, have executed this Amendment by way of signature by both parties and on the date indicated below. Please return two (2) original signed copies to the City and District no later than August 3, 2018. The City and RCFPD will process both copies for signature and provide Consultant with one (1) fully executed copy of the Amendment. HMC Architeo4s By: ! a 5 Z11to Name Date S nior Vice Pr�sidtw* Title By:J 8/2/18 -� 490 Name Date Principal Title (two signatures required if corporation) Last Revised. 09/28/2012 City of Rancho Cucamonga By: Name Date Title Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District By: Name Title Date Page I of I Page 35 FMCGroup Amendment No Date: June 17, 2018 (Revised August 2, 2018) Project Name: City of Rancho Cucamonga New Fire Station #172 Additional Services for Redesign and Fee Augmentation HMC #2369003000 AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO OWNER/ARCHITECT AGREEMENT That certain Owner/Architect Agreement (Agreement) dated April 5, 2017, by and between City of Rancho Cucamonga, a Municipal Corporation ("City") the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District ("RCFPD") and HMC GROUP (Architect), with respect to providing Architectural and Engineering Services is hereby amended, modified, and revised as follows: Scope of Work: Task 1 The Project Scope of Work approved by the RCFPD on 11/9/2017 has expanded at the request of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the RCFPD and been approved to include the following: • Building A —Add additional 2,618 square feet to the Sheriff space. • Building B —Add previously excluded 4,297 square feet Evidence -Storage Building back into design scope. Building shall continue to be bid alternate. • Site Improvements - Added 4,912 square feet of covered carports back to the scope of work. HMC estimates that the Construction Cost Budget for the Project was increased from $14,355,678 to $17,403,800. HMC Group is requesting additional services for work completed to date for Schametic Design (100%) and Construction Document (35%) completed to date on the estimated increased cost of construction. Task 2 The RCFPD has requested that HMC redesign the fire station side of Building A to reduce project scope. Revised project scope includes the following: • Eliminate one (1) apparatus bay • Eliminate two (2) dorm rooms • Eliminate one (1) shower/restroom • Reduce size of kitchen and sitting room • Add extension of off-site fiber cabling from Vineyard Avenue onto San Bernardino Road. This request will require HMC to redesign the civil rough grading package which had already been submitted to the City Building and Safety Department, Architectural and Landscape Site Plan, Floor Plans, Reflected Ceiling Plans, Roof Plan and exterior elevations and submit a completely revised schematic design package to the Planning Department for review and approval. In addition, HMC will need to bring on an additional engineer to coordinate off-site fiber cabling. HMC Group is requesting additional services for Schematic Design and to revise and Construction Documents as required. Task 3 Based on Task 1 and Task 2 above, the Construction Cost Budget for the Project must be be revised to reflect the new estimated budget to reflect additional square footage in Building A (Approximately 600 sf), Building B building and additional covered Sheriff's parking. The total Construction Cost Budget is further adjusted from $14,355,687 to reflecting a total estimated construction cost budget of $15,472,830. Page 36 City of Rancho Cucamonga New Fire Station #172 Additional Services for Redesign and Fee Augmentation Amendment No. 3 August 2, 2018 Page 2 Task 4 Based on conversations with Erickson Hall and Dan Guerra and Associates, the Construction and Architectural/Engineering Teams are in agreement that construction staking should be removed from Dan Guerra & Associates Scope of Work. This Amendment will remove this scope and credit back fee to the District in the amount of $20,000. Architect's Compensation: Task 1 Fee for the additional scope of work listed above shall be a fixed fee of One Hundred Seven Thousand Six Hundred Sevety-Five Dollars ($107,675). Task 2 Fee for the additional redesign shall be a fixed fee of One Hundred Five Thousand Eight Hundred Fourty-Four Dollars ($105,844). Task 3 The Basic Services fee shall be increased, not to exceed, One Hundred Fourty Thousand One Hundred Ninety - Four Dollars ($140,194) based on 9%* of the increased estimated Construction Cost of $1,947,243, as follows: Building and Site Elevation Schematic (20%) $ 22,625 Construction Documents (55%) $ 62,217 Bidding Assistance (5%) $ 5,656 Construction Administration (20%) 49,696 (See note below) Total $140,194 * This is a lower percentage than originally proposed and to reflect the inclusion of all the Engineering and Design services for the 2 alternates that will be absorbed as part of this lower fee percentage. Task 4 Credit of fee for construction staking services during construction for fixed fee amount Twenty Thousand Dollars <$20,000>. Fee Summary: Original Contract Approved Amendment #1 Approved Amendment #2 Amendment #3 (Task 1) Amendment #3 (Task 2) Amendment #3 (Task 3) Amendment #3 (Task 4) Amendment #3 Design Discount Total Revised Fee $ 622,600 $ 747,562 $ 20,000 $ 107,675 $ 98,478 $ 140,194 $ -20,000 $ -25.000 $1,691,509 (Excluding Reimbursable Expenses) 3546 Concours Street / Ontario, CA 91764 / T 909 989 99791 F 909 483 1403 / www.hmcarchiteGts.com Page 37 City of Rancho Cucamonga New Fire Station #172 Additional Services for Redesign and Fee Augmentation Amendment No. 3 August 2, 2018 Page 3 Reimbursable Expenses: Reimbursable expenses are in addition to compensation for Basic and Owner approved Additional Services, including printing, plotting (including 3D plotting), delivery, electronic submittal and other expenses related to Agency review, Bidding, Construction or other Owner requested costs. Expense of transportation (including mileage) in connection with the Project; Expenses in connection with authorized out-of-town travel, including travel time; and fees paid for securing approval of authorities having jurisdiction over the Project. The Architect's compensation shall be computed based on one and one-tenth (1.10) times the amounts invoiced to the Architect. Please review this Amendment and if it meets with your approval, please sign and return one (1) original to my attention. If you have any questions please contact me at (909)-989-9979 ext. 2309 HMC GROUP 3546 Concours Street Ontario, CA 91764 By 6/17/17 Chris Taylor, AIA DBIA, LEER® AP (Date) Principal cc: S.Jimenez, Andy Thompson (HMC) File -CN -AOA Amend No. 3180802-3 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 By (Date) 3546 Concours Street / Ontario, CA 91764 / T 909 989 9979 / F 909 483 1403 / www.hmcarchitects.com Page 38 Page 39 \ \\\\i \\\} \ « \ \Z _ !!B \ \\ §f] t - \ ) § § § ) * - §� ® - { \� }H {\\\\\ \ y \ \ \\\$ \ \\ \ \ \ \ 7 ! r\ - ! § \ \ \ \\\) \ \\\\ \\ \ Page 39 DATE: August 15, 2018 TO: President and Members of the Board of Directors FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: William Wittkopf, Public Works Services Director Ivan Rojer, Fire Chief Michael Courtney, Maintenance Supervisor Inge Tunggaldjaja, Management Analyst I SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO RENEW CONTRACT CO 14-175 WITH ABC LOCKSMITH, INC. FOR CITYWIDE KEYS, KEYS REPAIR AND REPLACEMENT ON AN AS NEEDED BASIS. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board of Directors approve Amendment No. 5 to contract CO 14-175 with ABC Locksmiths, I nc. for "Citywide Keys, Key Repair and Replacement on an As Needed Basis" extending the term of the contract to June 30, 2019, and an estimated total contract value of $22,500 over the three years remaining on the contract; and, authorize the Fire Chief to renew the contract annually. BACKGROUND: In 1997, the City of Rancho Cucamonga implemented a new Citywide key system called Schlage Primus for all City facilities and Fire station buildings. The Schlage Primus key blanks, locks, and key codes are unique and protected, only to be used by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. ABC Locksmiths, Inc. has all the cut -codes and records used at the different City and Fire buildings and is the sole source vendor for keys, key repairs and replacements. ABC Locksmiths, Inc. also retains the exclusive right to make and/or copy any City/Fire issued key with the authorization from facilities management, which eliminates the risk of any person making copies of these secured keys. ANALYSIS: ABC Locksmiths, Inc. has submitted a Letter of Intent expressing their desire to continue providing service to the City of Rancho Cucamonga during 2018/2019 with NO rate increase. Staff recommends the Fire Board approve the renewal of contract CO 14-175 effective July 1, 2018 and approve the spending limit of $7,500 for FY 2018/19 and the estimated total contract value of $22,500 over the three years remaining on the contract. An additional $127,200 over three years for keys, key repair and replacement services for City facilities will be considered separately by the City Council. Page 40 FISCAL IMPACT: The contract price is within the contract services budget line items in the approved budget for FY 2018/2019. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: The provision of key services enhances the City's premier community status through the maintenance of City facilities. ATTACHMENTS: Description Amendment 5 Page 41 AMENDMENT NO. 005 to Professional Services Agreement (CO #14-175) between ABC Locksmiths, Inc (hereinafter "Contractor") and City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter the "City") This Amendment No. 005 will serve to amend the Professional Services Agreement (hereinafter "Agreement"), CO# 14-175, to incorporate the following: The above mentioned PSA has been in effect for four (4) years and has an option to renew in one (1) year increments to a total of seven (7) years. Contractor, City and the Fire District would like to exercise the option to renew CO# 14-175 for one (1) additional year extending the Agreement Term Date to June 30, 2019. Said extension will be in accordance with the Contractor's Letter of Intent attached hereto. This would be the fifth year of the Agreement. All other Terms and Conditions of the original Agreement C0414-175, will remain in full effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties, through their respective authorized representatives, have executed this Amendment by way of signature by both parties and on the date indicated below. Please return two (2) original signed copies to the City no later than June 28, 2018. The City will process both copies for signature and provide ABC Locksmiths,Inc with one (1) fully executed copy of the Amendment. A Vit.hs, I/ B ennis Vessels 06120/18 Name Date President Title By: Name Date Title (two signatures required if corporation) Last Revised: 09/28/2012 City of Rancho Cucamonga 0 Name Date Title By: Name Date Title Page I of I Page 42 ABC Locksmiths, Inc. 9684 Foothill Blvd. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91730 909-987-2557 909-987-3838 fax To whom it concerns, June 14, 2018 It is the intention of ABC Locksmiths, Inc. to continue conducting business with the City of Rancho Cucamonga through the new 2018-2019 fiscal year. All company Insurance requirements will be renewed and kept to City requiremnets. All company information and all price structures and rates, charged to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, for services and goods on an as needed basis, will remain the same as they were for fiscal year 2017-2018. ABC Locksmiths, Inc. 1 Page 43 DATE: August 15, 2018 TO: President and Members of the Board of Directors FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Ruth Cain, CPPB, Procurement Manager Cheryl Combs, Procurement Technician SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO CONTINUE THE CITYWIDE PROCUREMENT OF GASOLINE AND DIESEL FUEL FROM SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL COMPANY DBA SC FUELS ON A MONTH TO MONTH BASIS FUNDED BY VARIOUS ACCOUNT NUMBERS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FY 2018/19 ADOPTED BUDGET. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Fire Board approve the continued citywide procurement of gasoline and diesel fuel from Southern Counties Oil Company dba SC Fuels funded by various account numbers in accordance with the FY 2018/19 Adopted Budget. BACKGROUND: The City has utilized The Cooperative Purchasing Network (TCPN) cooperative agreement for the procurement of gasoline and diesel fuel from SC Fuels for the past six (6) years. The agreement was not renewed and there was no new award made. SC Fuels does not have any other open cooperative agreements or contracts with other municipalities that the City could potentially piggyback off of. They have, however, agreed to hold the original pricing that the City was receiving from the TCPN agreement on a month to month basis while research is being conducted to locate the most advantageous method of procurement for gasoline and diesel fuel for the City. ANALYSIS: The Procurement Division is actively searching for a new method of procurement, including other cooperative contracts and piggyback opportunities that would offer the best value to the City due to the volume procured. Therefore, staff recommends that the Fire Board authorize procuring gasoline and diesel fuel from SC Fuels based on their offer to hold pricing on a month to month basis. FISCAL IMPACT: The amount spent for gasoline and diesel fuel in FY 2017/18 citywide was $697,147.00. There would be no fiscal impact beyond that which has already been budgeted in the FY 2018/19 Adopted Budget. Continuing to procure fuel from SC fuels offers the best option to the City as they have agreed to honor the same price on a month to month basis. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Page 44 Continuing to procure gasoline and diesel fuel from SC Fuels gives the Procurement Division an opportunity to find a procurement scenario that will offer the best value with the most advantageous pricing for the City. Locating a cooperative agreement or piggyback opportunity would link to the Council goal of Mid and Long Range Planning as a consistent, more stable fuel rate would be offered for the term of the agreement and provide staff the ability to accurately plan their budgets without having to consider the volatile cost of fuel. Page 45 DATE: August 15, 2018 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Tamara Layne, Finance Director SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE BI -WEEKLY PAYROLL IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,166,634.97 AND WEEKLY CHECK REGISTERS IN THE AMOUNT OF $7,014,477.39 DATED JULY 24, 2018 THROUGH AUGUST 07, 2018 AND ELECTRONIC DEBIT REGISTER FOR THE MONTH OF JULY 2018 IN THE AMOUNT OF $3,588,105.71. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends City Council approve payment of demands as presented. BACKGROUND: N/A ANALYSIS: N/A FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate budgeted funds are available for the payment of demands per the attached listing. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: N/A ATTACHMENTS: Description Attachment 1 Check Register Attachment 1 Electronic Register Page 46 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 7/24/2018 through 8/7/2018 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00008143 07/25/2018 AHUMADA, ALEXANDER R 0.00 631.60 631.60 AP 00008144 07/25/2018 ALMAND, LLOYD 0.00 631.60 631.60 AP 00008145 07/25/2018 BANTAU, VICTORIA 0.00 499.68 499.68 AP 00008146 07/25/2018 BAZAL, SUSAN 0.00 585.98 585.98 AP 00008147 07/25/2018 BELL, MICHAEL L. 0.00 1,214.46 1,214.46 AP 00008148 07/25/2018 BERRY, DAVID 0.00 1,152.40 1,152.40 AP 00008149 07/25/2018 BROCK, ROBIN 0.00 923.03 923.03 AP 00008150 07/25/2018 CAMPBELL, GERALD 0.00 826.04 826.04 AP 00008151 07/25/2018 CAMPBELL, STEVEN 0.00 1,327.27 1,327.27 AP 00008152 07/25/2018 CARNES, KENNETH 0.00 499.68 499.68 AP 00008153 07/25/2018 CLABBY, RICHARD 0.00 1,152.40 1,152.40 AP 00008154 07/25/2018 CLOUGHESY, DONALD R 0.00 1,618.70 1,618.70 AP 00008155 07/25/2018 CORCORAN, ROBERT 0.00 540.73 540.73 AP 00008156 07/25/2018 COSTELLO, DENNIS M 0.00 1,618.70 1,618.70 AP 00008157 07/25/2018 COX, KARL 0.00 631.60 631.60 AP 00008158 07/25/2018 CRANE, RALPH 0.00 968.28 968.28 AP 00008159 07/25/2018 CROSSLAND, WILBUR 0.00 499.68 499.68 AP 00008160 07/25/2018 DAGUE, JAMES 0.00 1,214.46 1,214.46 AP 00008161 07/25/2018 DE ANTONIO, SUSAN 0.00 540.73 540.73 AP 00008162 07/25/2018 DEANS, JACKIE 0.00 585.98 585.98 AP 00008163 07/25/2018 DOMINICK, SAMUEL A. 0.00 923.03 923.03 AP 00008164 07/25/2018 EAGLESON, MICHAEL 0.00 1,214.46 1,214.46 AP 00008165 07/25/2018 EGGERS, BOB 0.00 1,618.70 1,618.70 AP 00008166 07/25/2018 FRITCHEY, JOHN D. 0.00 499.68 499.68 AP 00008167 07/25/2018 HEYDE, DONALD 0.00 631.60 631.60 AP 00008168 07/25/2018 INTERLICCHIA, ROSALYN 0.00 249.30 249.30 AP 00008169 07/25/2018 KILMER, STEPHEN 0.00 1,152.40 1,152.40 AP 00008170 07/25/2018 LANE, WILLIAM 0.00 1,214.46 1,214.46 AP 00008171 07/25/2018 LARKIN, DAVID W 0.00 1,538.02 1,538.02 AP 00008172 07/25/2018 LEE, ALLAN J. 0.00 1,264.92 1,264.92 AP 00008173 07/25/2018 LENZE, PAUL E 0.00 1,093.58 1,093.58 AP 00008174 07/25/2018 LONGO, JOE 0.00 183.34 183.34 AP 00008175 07/25/2018 LUTTRULL, DARRELL 0.00 499.68 499.68 AP 00008176 07/25/2018 MACKALL, BEVERLY 0.00 509.70 509.70 AP 00008177 07/25/2018 MAYFIELD, RON 0.00 1,304.96 1,304.96 AP 00008178 07/25/2018 MCKEE, JOHN 0.00 631.60 631.60 AP 00008179 07/25/2018 MCNEIL, KENNETH 0.00 631.60 631.60 AP 00008180 07/25/2018 MICHAEL, L. DENNIS 0.00 923.03 923.03 AP 00008181 07/25/2018 MORGAN, BYRON 0.00 1,714.62 1,714.62 AP 00008182 07/25/2018 MYSKOW, DENNIS 0.00 1,152.40 1,152.40 AP 00008183 07/25/2018 NAUMAN, MICHAEL 0.00 499.68 499.68 AP 00008184 07/25/2018 NEE, RON 0.00 585.98 585.98 AP 00008185 07/25/2018 NELSON, MARY JANE 0.00 183.34 183.34 AP 00008186 07/25/2018 O'BRIEN, TOM 0.00 1,618.70 1,618.70 AP 00008187 07/25/2018 PLOUNG, MICHAEL J 0.00 558.94 558.94 AP 00008188 07/25/2018 POST, MICHAEL R 0.00 1,586.77 1,586.77 AP 00008189 07/25/2018 PROULX, PATRICK 0.00 1,618.70 1,618.70 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 1 Current Date: 08/08/2018 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:27:11 Page 47 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 7/24/2018 through 8/7/2018 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00008190 07/25/2018 REDMOND, MIKE 0.00 1,214.46 1,214.46 AP 00008191 07/25/2018 ROEDER, JEFF 0.00 1,214.46 1,214.46 AP 00008192 07/25/2018 SALISBURY, THOMAS 0.00 631.60 631.60 AP 00008193 07/25/2018 SMITH, RONALD 0.00 499.68 499.68 AP 00008194 07/25/2018 SORENSEN, SCOTT D 0.00 1,736.35 1,736.35 AP 00008195 07/25/2018 SPAGNOLO, SAM 0.00 499.68 499.68 AP 00008196 07/25/2018 SPAIN, WILLIAM 0.00 826.04 826.04 AP 00008197 07/25/2018 SULLIVAN, JAMES 0.00 499.68 499.68 AP 00008198 07/25/2018 TAYLOR, STEVE 0.00 1,461.55 1,461.55 AP 00008199 07/25/2018 TULEY, TERRY 0.00 1,214.46 1,214.46 AP 00008200 07/25/2018 VANDERKALLEN, FRANCIS 0.00 631.60 631.60 AP 00008201 07/25/2018 VARNEY, ANTHONY 0.00 923.03 923.03 AP 00008202 07/25/2018 WALTON, KEVIN 0.00 1,538.02 1,538.02 AP 00008203 07/25/2018 YOWELL, TIMOTHY A 0.00 1,304.96 1,304.96 AP 00008204 07/25/2018 RIVERSIDE, CITY OF 6,909.00 0.00 6,909.00 AP 00008205 07/25/2018 SAN BERNARDINO CTY SHERIFFS DEPT 3,129,696.45 0.00 3,129,696.45 AP 00008206 08/01/2018 CALIF GOVERNMENT VEBA/RANCHO CUCAMONGA 37,861.44 0.00 37,861.44 AP 00008207 08/01/2018 RCCEA 1,780.00 0.00 1,780.00 AP 00008208 08/01/2018 RCPFA 11,509.11 0.00 11,509.11 AP 00008209 08/01/2018 RE ASTORIA 2 LLC 129,329.67 0.00 129,329.67 AP 00008210 08/01/2018 SHELL ENERGY NORTH AMERICA 219,750.00 0.00 219,750.00 AP 00392512 07/24/2018 CALIFORNIA DPT OF TAX & FEE ADMINISTRATION 912.12 52,992.86 53,904.98 *** AP 00392519 07/24/2018 CALIFORNIA DPT OF TAX & FEE ADMINISTRATION 1,752.57 620.90 2,373.47 *** AP 00392520 07/25/2018 CURATALO, JAMES 0.00 1,618.70 1,618.70 AP 00392521 07/25/2018 KIRKPATRICK, WILLIAM 0.00 1,093.58 1,093.58 AP 00392522 07/25/2018 LONCAR, PHILIP 0.00 1,152.40 1,152.40 AP 00392523 07/25/2018 TOWNSEND, JAMES 0.00 1,618.70 1,618.70 AP 00392524 07/25/2018 WALKER, KENNETH 0.00 249.30 249.30 AP 00392525 07/25/2018 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 709.53 0.00 709.53 AP 00392526 07/25/2018 ALL WELDING 197.00 0.00 197.00 AP 00392527 07/25/2018 ALLSTAR SOUND LLC 1,155.00 0.00 1,155.00 AP 00392528 07/25/2018 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 825.00 0.00 825.00 AP 00392529 07/25/2018 AUFBAU CORPORATION 34,200.00 0.00 34,200.00 AP 00392530 07/25/2018 AUFBAU CORPORATION 28,184.00 0.00 28,184.00 AP 00392531 07/25/2018 BARNES AND NOBLE 1,599.43 0.00 1,599.43 AP 00392532 07/25/2018 BASTIANSEN, MARGARET 9.00 0.00 9.00 AP 00392533 07/25/2018 BEST BEST AND KRIEGER 3,970.11 0.00 3,970.11 AP 00392534 07/25/2018 BLUM ELECTRIC 1,466.00 0.00 1,466.00 AP 00392535 07/25/2018 BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERVICES INC. 279,557.71 0.00 279,557.71 AP 00392536 07/25/2018 BRYAN CAVE LEIGHTON PAISNER LLP 1,685.00 0.00 1,685.00 AP 00392537 07/25/2018 C V W D 0.00 507.04 507.04 AP 00392541 07/25/2018 C V W D 103,919.98 1,897.36 105,817.34 *** AP 00392542 07/25/2018 C.P. CONSTRUCTION CO INC 10,548.32 0.00 10,548.32 AP 00392543 07/25/2018 CAINES, DAN 15.00 0.00 15.00 AP 00392544 07/25/2018 CALIFORNIA BANK & TRUST 29,697.46 0.00 29,697.46 AP 00392545 07/25/2018 CALIFORNIA BUILDING STANDARDS COMMISSION 902.70 0.00 902.70 AP 00392546 07/25/2018 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF 4,964.51 0.00 4,964.51 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 2 Current Date: 08/08/2018 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:27:11 Page 48 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 7/24/2018 through 8/7/2018 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00392547 07/25/2018 CINTAS CORPORATION #150 1,050.46 0.00 1,050.46 AP 00392548 07/25/2018 CRIME SCENE STERI-CLEAN LLC 810.00 0.00 810.00 AP 00392549 07/25/2018 D M CONTRACTING INC 18,840.78 0.00 18,840.78 AP 00392551 07/25/2018 D M CONTRACTING INC 216,227.05 0.00 216,227.05 AP 00392552 07/25/2018 DATA TICKET INC 4,235.57 0.00 4,235.57 AP 00392553 07/25/2018 DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION 5,551.90 0.00 5,551.90 AP 00392554 07/25/2018 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 6,538.00 0.00 6,538.00 AP 00392555 07/25/2018 DLIMAGING 139.17 0.00 139.17 AP 00392556 07/25/2018 DUNN, YOLANDA 15.00 0.00 15.00 AP 00392557 07/25/2018 DURKEL, CAROL 65.95 0.00 65.95 AP 00392558 07/25/2018 EMBROIDME 96.98 0.00 96.98 AP 00392559 07/25/2018 ENN GEE CORP. 585.00 0.00 585.00 AP 00392560 07/25/2018 EXPERIAN 52.00 0.00 52.00 AP 00392561 07/25/2018 FACER, LINDA 51.00 0.00 51.00 AP 00392562 07/25/2018 FAMILY SERVICES ASSOCIATION 10,700.00 0.00 10,700.00 AP 00392563 07/25/2018 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 11.65 0.00 11.65 AP 00392564 07/25/2018 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 18.29 0.00 18.29 AP 00392565 07/25/2018 FOOTHILL FAMILY SHELTER 2,500.00 0.00 2,500.00 AP 00392566 07/25/2018 G AND M BUSINESS INTERIORS 6,056.51 0.00 6,056.51 AP 00392567 07/25/2018 GAIL MATERIALS 2,385.61 0.00 2,385.61 AP 00392568 07/25/2018 GATEWAY PET CEMETERY AND CREMATORY 720.00 0.00 720.00 AP 00392569 07/25/2018 GEOGRAPHICS 1,071.19 0.00 1,071.19 AP 00392570 07/25/2018 GEORGE HILLS COMPANY 1,344.60 0.00 1,344.60 AP 00392571 07/25/2018 GRAINGER 556.44 0.00 556.44 AP 00392572 07/25/2018 GRAVES & KING LLP 555.00 0.00 555.00 AP 00392573 07/25/2018 HANSEN, BARBARA 21.80 0.00 21.80 AP 00392574 07/25/2018 HDR ENGINEERING INC 5,056.82 0.00 5,056.82 AP 00392575 07/25/2018 HENRY SCHEIN ANIMAL HEALTH SUPPLY 1,125.52 0.00 1,125.52 AP 00392576 07/25/2018 HERMAN, PENNI 285.04 0.00 285.04 AP 00392577 07/25/2018 HMC ARCHITECTS 0.00 54,396.72 54,396.72 AP 00392578 07/25/2018 HUB CONSTRUCTION SPECIALTIES INC 1,468.37 0.00 1,468.37 AP 00392579 07/25/2018 IDEXX DISTRIBUTION INC 5,192.94 0.00 5,192.94 AP 00392580 07/25/2018 INDUSTRIAL HARDWARE AND SERVICE CO 282.31 0.00 282.31 AP 00392581 07/25/2018 INLAND PRESORT & MAILING SERVICES 134.02 0.00 134.02 AP 00392582 07/25/2018 INTERNATIONAL LINE BUILDERS INC 188,754.07 125,836.06 314,590.13 *** AP 00392583 07/25/2018 INTERVET INC 4,840.96 0.00 4,840.96 AP 00392584 07/25/2018 JURMAN, KIMBERLY 140.00 0.00 140.00 AP 00392585 07/25/2018 KABAGE, HEIDI 15.00 0.00 15.00 AP 00392586 07/25/2018 LANDCARE USA LLC 11,580.00 0.00 11,580.00 AP 00392587 07/25/2018 LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC. 10,117.73 0.00 10,117.73 AP 00392588 07/25/2018 LEONIDA BUILDERS INC 12,500.00 0.00 12,500.00 AP 00392589 07/25/2018 LIBERTY PLUGINS INC 1,620.00 0.00 1,620.00 AP 00392590 07/25/2018 LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION 1,181.82 0.00 1,181.82 AP 00392591 07/25/2018 MAIN STREET SIGNS 409.18 0.00 409.18 AP 00392592 07/25/2018 MARIPOSA LANDSCAPES INC 26,295.66 1,208.16 27,503.82 *** AP 00392593 07/25/2018 MEDIWASTE DISPOSAL 102.12 0.00 102.12 AP 00392594 07/25/2018 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 1,656.61 0.00 1,656.61 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 3 Current Date: 08/08/2018 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:27:11 Page 49 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 7/24/2018 through 8/7/2018 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00392595 07/25/2018 NEWCO DISTRIBUTORS INC 440.70 0.00 440.70 AP 00392596 07/25/2018 NEWCOMB ANDERSON MCCORMICK INC 1,630.00 0.00 1,630.00 AP 00392597 07/25/2018 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CTRS OF CA 736.66 0.00 736.66 AP 00392598 07/25/2018 ONTARIO SPAY AND NEUTER INC 200.00 0.00 200.00 AP 00392599 07/25/2018 ONTRAC 52.10 0.00 52.10 AP 00392600 07/25/2018 ONWARD ENGINEERING 192.00 0.00 192.00 AP 00392601 07/25/2018 ONWARD ENGINEERING 22,795.00 0.00 22,795.00 AP 00392602 07/25/2018 OPARC 440.00 0.00 440.00 AP 00392603 07/25/2018 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL INC 3,940.36 0.00 3,940.36 AP 00392604 07/25/2018 RCPFA 0.00 59.00 59.00 AP 00392605 07/25/2018 REYNAGA, FRACISCO 15.00 0.00 15.00 AP 00392606 07/25/2018 RIO HONDO COLLEGE 53.00 0.00 53.00 AP 00392607 07/25/2018 RJM DESIGN GROUP INC 11,477.75 0.00 11,477.75 AP 00392608 07/25/2018 ROADRUNNER PHARMACY 1,095.08 0.00 1,095.08 AP 00392609 07/25/2018 ROTARY CLUB OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 208.23 0.00 208.23 AP 00392610 07/25/2018 ROTO ROOTER 2,190.00 1,250.00 3,440.00 *** AP 00392611 07/25/2018 SAFEWAY SIGN COMPANY 21,614.38 0.00 21,614.38 AP 00392612 07/25/2018 SAN BERNARDINO CO AUDITOR CONT 10,302.68 0.00 10,302.68 AP 00392613 07/25/2018 SC FUELS 0.00 12,284.24 12,284.24 AP 00392614 07/25/2018 SHOETERIA 355.00 0.00 355.00 AP 00392615 07/25/2018 SILVER & WRIGHT LLP 12,348.41 0.00 12,348.41 AP 00392616 07/25/2018 SMITH, THERESE 65.95 0.00 65.95 AP 00392617 07/25/2018 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 49.56 0.00 49.56 AP 00392618 07/25/2018 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 149.21 0.00 149.21 AP 00392619 07/25/2018 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 3,303.24 0.00 3,303.24 AP 00392620 07/25/2018 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 6,133.27 0.00 6,133.27 AP 00392621 07/25/2018 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,576.17 0.00 1,576.17 AP 00392622 07/25/2018 SOUTHERN CONTRACTING 1,197.95 0.00 1,197.95 AP 00392623 07/25/2018 STATEWIDE TRAFFIC SAFETY & SIGNS INC 9,764.70 0.00 9,764.70 AP 00392624 07/25/2018 SUNWORKS 13,060.00 0.00 13,060.00 AP 00392625 07/25/2018 SWAN-PRUNG, NATHAN 15.00 0.00 15.00 AP 00392626 07/25/2018 THOMSON REUTERS WEST PUBLISHING CORP 364.93 0.00 364.93 AP 00392627 07/25/2018 TOVEY/SHULTZ CONSTRUCTION INC 564,251.70 0.00 564,251.70 AP 00392628 07/25/2018 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 216.00 0.00 216.00 AP 00392629 07/25/2018 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 421.11 0.00 421.11 AP 00392630 07/25/2018 VICTOR MEDICAL COMPANY 24,665.04 0.00 24,665.04 AP 00392631 07/25/2018 VIVERAE INC 4,059.75 0.00 4,059.75 AP 00392632 07/25/2018 WANG, LI 120.00 0.00 120.00 AP 00392633 07/25/2018 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 1,943.60 0.00 1,943.60 AP 00392634 07/25/2018 WEST COAST SAND AND GRAVEL INC 1,150.59 0.00 1,150.59 AP 00392635 07/25/2018 WEST END MATERIAL SUPPLY 0.00 782.90 782.90 AP 00392636 07/25/2018 WIENER, ALITZAH 1,600.00 0.00 1,600.00 AP 00392637 07/25/2018 WILBUR-ELLIS COMPANY 435.31 0.00 435.31 AP 00392638 07/25/2018 XEROX FINANCIAL SERVICES 298.38 0.00 298.38 AP 00392639 07/25/2018 ZOETIS US LLC 1,824.55 0.00 1,824.55 AP 00392640 07/25/2018 ALLIANT INSURANCE SERVICES INC. 184.00 0.00 184.00 AP 00392641 07/25/2018 ALLIANT INSURANCE SERVICES INC. 285.00 0.00 285.00 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 4 Current Date: 08/08/2018 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:27:11 Page 50 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 7/24/2018 through 8/7/2018 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00392642 07/25/2018 ALTA VISTA MOBILE HOME PARK 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00392643 07/25/2018 AROCHO, ALMA 1,275.00 0.00 1,275.00 AP 00392644 07/25/2018 BALL, ROBERT 0.00 32.47 32.47 AP 00392645 07/25/2018 BAST, KAROLYN 202.80 0.00 202.80 AP 00392646 07/25/2018 CA LLC - DBA ALTA LAGUNA MHP 600.00 0.00 600.00 AP 00392647 07/25/2018 CACEO 469.00 0.00 469.00 AP 00392648 07/25/2018 CAL PERS LONG TERM CARE 254.14 0.00 254.14 AP 00392649 07/25/2018 CALIFORNIA SECRETARY OF STATE 40.00 0.00 40.00 AP 00392650 07/25/2018 CALPELRA 1,045.00 0.00 1,045.00 AP 00392651 07/25/2018 CASA VOLANTE MOBILE HOME PARK 800.00 0.00 800.00 AP 00392652 07/25/2018 CASTILLO, JESSIE 200.00 0.00 200.00 AP 00392653 07/25/2018 CASTILLO, JESSIE 300.00 0.00 300.00 AP 00392654 07/25/2018 CDW GOVERNMENT INC. 0.00 976.22 976.22 AP 00392655 07/25/2018 CERVANTES, VICTORIA LEE 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00392656 07/25/2018 CHAPARRAL HEIGHTS MOBILE HOME PARK 700.00 0.00 700.00 AP 00392657 07/25/2018 CHINO MOWER AND ENGINE SERVICE 470.06 0.00 470.06 AP 00392658 07/25/2018 CINTAS CORPORATION #150 0.00 404.03 404.03 AP 00392659 07/25/2018 CLARK, KAREN 792.00 0.00 792.00 AP 00392660 07/25/2018 DAISY 372.73 0.00 372.73 AP 00392661 07/25/2018 DATA21NC 4,500.63 0.00 4,500.63 AP 00392662 07/25/2018 DOLLARHIDE, GINGER 80.00 0.00 80.00 AP 00392663 07/25/2018 DUNN, ANN MARIE 539.38 0.00 539.38 AP 00392664 07/25/2018 EASTERLING, RAY 307.20 0.00 307.20 AP 00392665 07/25/2018 FBI-LEEDA 650.00 0.00 650.00 AP 00392666 07/25/2018 FINCHER, VERONICA 2,300.00 0.00 2,300.00 AP 00392667 07/25/2018 FLEET SERVICES INC. 0.00 24.11 24.11 AP 00392668 07/25/2018 FRANKLIN TRUCK PARTS 0.00 216.68 216.68 AP 00392670 07/25/2018 FRONTIER COMM 3,371.73 561.99 3,933.72 *** AP 00392671 07/25/2018 GASB 265.00 0.00 265.00 AP 00392672 07/25/2018 GIORDANO, MARIANNA 92.18 0.00 92.18 AP 00392673 07/25/2018 GRAINGER 75.29 0.00 75.29 AP 00392674 07/25/2018 GROVES ON FOOTHILL, THE 300.00 0.00 300.00 AP 00392675 07/25/2018 HAMILTON, MONIQUE 960.00 0.00 960.00 AP 00392676 07/25/2018 HAMPTON YOGA 1,068.00 0.00 1,068.00 AP 00392677 07/25/2018 HOMETOWN AMERICA RAMONA VILLA 800.00 0.00 800.00 AP 00392678 07/25/2018 HOSE MAN INC 0.00 913.77 913.77 AP 00392679 07/25/2018 IAPMO 300.00 0.00 300.00 AP 00392680 07/25/2018 IATSE NATIONAL HEALTH & WELFARE FUNDS 240.00 0.00 240.00 AP 00392681 07/25/2018 INDUSTRIAL HARDWARE AND SERVICE CO 1,594.70 0.00 1,594.70 AP 00392682 07/25/2018 INTERVET INC 4,840.96 0.00 4,840.96 AP 00392683 07/25/2018 JOHNSON, CHEARICE 83.06 0.00 83.06 AP 00392684 07/25/2018 KINETIC LIGHTING INC 1,500.00 0.00 1,500.00 AP 00392685 07/25/2018 KINGDOM CREATIONS 688.52 0.00 688.52 AP 00392686 07/25/2018 LATREACE, RAINEY 416.00 0.00 416.00 AP 00392687 07/25/2018 LAWDIS, STEVE 137.34 0.00 137.34 AP 00392688 07/25/2018 MANGO LANGUAGES 9,733.00 0.00 9,733.00 AP 00392689 07/25/2018 MARZOUGUI, SAMI 8.38 0.00 8.38 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 5 Current Date: 08/08/2018 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:27:11 Page 51 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 7/24/2018 through 8/7/2018 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00392690 07/25/2018 MASSAGE PALACE 490.63 0.00 490.63 AP 00392691 07/25/2018 MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 367.20 0.00 367.20 AP 00392692 07/25/2018 MILLER MANAGEMENT & CONSULTING GROUP 1,150.00 0.00 1,150.00 AP 00392693 07/25/2018 MOST DEPENDABLE FOUNTAINS INC 795.65 0.00 795.65 AP 00392694 07/25/2018 MYERS, CRICKET 666.00 0.00 666.00 AP 00392695 07/25/2018 NAPA AUTO PARTS 0.00 292.21 292.21 AP 00392696 07/25/2018 NEWCO DISTRIBUTORS INC 526.47 0.00 526.47 AP 00392697 07/25/2018 NORMANDIE, HEATHER 600.00 0.00 600.00 AP 00392698 07/25/2018 ORIEL, JASMIN 21.85 0.00 21.85 AP 00392699 07/25/2018 ORONA, PATRICIA 420.00 0.00 420.00 AP 00392700 07/25/2018 OTT, LAURA 753.00 0.00 753.00 AP 00392701 07/25/2018 OTT, SHARON 391.50 0.00 391.50 AP 00392702 07/25/2018 PACIFIC ANIMAL PRODUCTIONS 1,510.00 0.00 1,510.00 AP 00392703 07/25/2018 PAPAZOGLU, NORAY 1,130.40 0.00 1,130.40 AP 00392704 07/25/2018 PENINSULA PLASTICS LTD 1,700.00 0.00 1,700.00 AP 00392705 07/25/2018 PINEDA, JULIO 15.00 0.00 15.00 AP 00392706 07/25/2018 PINES MOBILE HOME PARK, THE 400.00 0.00 400.00 AP 00392707 07/25/2018 PSA PRINT GROUP 269.81 0.00 269.81 AP 00392708 07/25/2018 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 3,166.00 0.00 3,166.00 AP 00392709 07/25/2018 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 149.23 0.00 149.23 AP 00392710 07/25/2018 REA, GARY 2,104.08 0.00 2,104.08 AP 00392711 07/25/2018 RICK HUDDLE 1,400.00 0.00 1,400.00 AP 00392712 07/25/2018 RIGLEMAN, ENCARNACION ONTIVEROS 160.00 0.00 160.00 AP 00392713 07/25/2018 ROUCH, PETE 26.16 0.00 26.16 AP 00392714 07/25/2018 RUIZ, OCTAVIO 62.00 0.00 62.00 AP 00392715 07/25/2018 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 0.00 600.00 600.00 AP 00392716 07/25/2018 SCL 0.00 546.79 546.79 AP 00392717 07/25/2018 SENECHAL, CALVIN 489.00 0.00 489.00 AP 00392718 07/25/2018 SNYDER, MAKENZIE 0.00 298.41 298.41 AP 00392719 07/25/2018 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 18.52 243.12 261.64 *** AP 00392720 07/25/2018 SOUND IMAGE INC 890.95 0.00 890.95 AP 00392724 07/25/2018 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17,212.25 1,953.40 19,165.65 *** AP 00392725 07/25/2018 SOUTHLAND SPORTS OFFICIALS 2,120.00 0.00 2,120.00 AP 00392726 07/25/2018 STOR'EM SELF STORAGE 545.00 0.00 545.00 AP 00392727 07/25/2018 SYCAMORE VILLA MOBILE HOME PARK 300.00 0.00 300.00 AP 00392728 07/25/2018 SYSCO LOS ANGELES INC 1,979.42 0.00 1,979.42 AP 00392729 07/25/2018 THEATRE COMPANY, THE 245.00 0.00 245.00 AP 00392730 07/25/2018 TYUS, IDA 486.00 0.00 486.00 AP 00392731 07/25/2018 UNDERGROUND SVC ALERT OF SO CAL 272.35 0.00 272.35 AP 00392732 07/25/2018 UNITED SCENIC ARTISTS PENSION & WELFARE FUNDS 180.00 0.00 180.00 AP 00392733 07/25/2018 VALLEY POWER SYSTEMS INC 0.00 92.22 92.22 AP 00392734 07/25/2018 VASTA, WILLIAM 525.00 0.00 525.00 AP 00392735 07/25/2018 VISION SERVICE PLAN CA 11,333.38 0.00 11,333.38 AP 00392736 07/25/2018 VORTEX INDUSTRIES INC 0.00 396.00 396.00 AP 00392737 07/25/2018 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 1,848.53 0.00 1,848.53 AP 00392738 07/25/2018 WELLS FARGO BANK N A 3,500.00 0.00 3,500.00 AP 00392739 07/25/2018 WESTNET INC 0.00 6,963.32 6,963.32 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 6 Current Date: 08/08/2018 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:27:11 Page 52 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 7/24/2018 through 8/7/2018 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00392740 07/25/2018 YORK INSURANCE SERVICES GROUP INC 0.00 21,224.25 21,224.25 AP 00392741 07/26/2018 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 0.00 521.01 521.01 AP 00392742 07/26/2018 LN CURTIS AND SONS 0.00 1,313.39 1,313.39 AP 00392743 07/26/2018 OFFICE DEPOT 872.96 229.53 1,102.49 *** AP 00392744 07/26/2018 PSA PRINT GROUP 0.00 38.79 38.79 AP 00392745 07/26/2018 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 646.49 0.00 646.49 AP 00392746 07/26/2018 TUTOR.COM INC 20,000.00 0.00 20,000.00 AP 00392747 07/26/2018 ABC LOCKSMITHS 347.50 1,425.70 1,773.20 *** AP 00392748 07/26/2018 AIRGAS USA LLC 761.38 0.00 761.38 AP 00392749 07/26/2018 BIBLIOTHECA LLC 4,721.37 0.00 4,721.37 AP 00392754 07/26/2018 BRODART BOOKS 23,154.91 0.00 23,154.91 AP 00392755 07/26/2018 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 283.51 0.00 283.51 AP 00392756 07/26/2018 FORD OF UPLAND INC 184.87 0.00 184.87 AP 00392757 07/26/2018 GALLS LLC. 0.00 1,239.77 1,239.77 AP 00392758 07/26/2018 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 2,862.41 0.00 2,862.41 AP 00392759 07/26/2018 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 13,048.30 0.00 13,048.30 AP 00392760 07/26/2018 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 1,035.00 0.00 1,035.00 AP 00392761 07/26/2018 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 513.85 0.00 513.85 AP 00392762 07/26/2018 MINUTEMAN PRESS 175.88 0.00 175.88 AP 00392763 07/26/2018 OFFICE DEPOT 8,014.56 0.00 8,014.56 AP 00392764 07/26/2018 ORKIN PEST CONTROL 918.00 0.00 918.00 AP 00392765 07/26/2018 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS 868.41 0.00 868.41 AP 00392766 07/26/2018 VISTA PAINT 107.01 0.00 107.01 AP 00392767 07/26/2018 LITTLE MEDICAL SCHOOL 7,389.00 0.00 7,389.00 AP 00392768 08/01/2018 ACEY DECY EQUIPMENT INC. 138.93 0.00 138.93 AP 00392769 08/01/2018 AFLAC GROUP INSURANCE 40.97 0.00 40.97 AP 00392770 08/01/2018 AGE -FREE, SERENA 125.54 0.00 125.54 AP 00392771 08/01/2018 ALL CITIES TOOLS 134.69 1,765.49 1,900.18 *** AP 00392772 08/01/2018 ALLERGY & ASTHMA CENTER 816.19 0.00 816.19 AP 00392773 08/01/2018 ALLIANCE BUS LINES INC 2,554.83 0.00 2,554.83 AP 00392774 08/01/2018 AMERICAN TRAINING RESOURCES INC 1,079.91 0.00 1,079.91 AP 00392775 08/01/2018 AMERON POLE PRODUCTS LLC 47,772.43 0.00 47,772.43 AP 00392776 08/01/2018 APPLIED CONCEPTS 219.34 0.00 219.34 AP 00392777 08/01/2018 AUTO AND RV SPECIALISTS INC. 76.34 0.00 76.34 AP 00392778 08/01/2018 AVILA, ROSY 425.00 0.00 425.00 AP 00392779 08/01/2018 BiCOASTAL PRODUCTIONS 2,790.00 0.00 2,790.00 AP 00392780 08/01/2018 BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERVICES INC. 329.46 0.00 329.46 AP 00392781 08/01/2018 BROOKS, THERESA 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00392782 08/01/2018 BSN SPORTS LLC 3,316.87 0.00 3,316.87 AP 00392783 08/01/2018 BUD FORREST ENTERTAINMENT INC. 7,500.00 0.00 7,500.00 AP 00392784 08/01/2018 BUSINESS MANAGEMENT DAILY 139.00 0.00 139.00 AP 00392785 08/01/2018 CAL PERS LONG TERM CARE 254.14 0.00 254.14 AP 00392786 08/01/2018 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 312.88 0.00 312.88 AP 00392787 08/01/2018 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 100.00 0.00 100.00 AP 00392788 08/01/2018 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 8.44 0.00 8.44 AP 00392789 08/01/2018 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 301.05 0.00 301.05 AP 00392790 08/01/2018 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 1,318.48 0.00 1,318.48 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 7 Current Date: 08/08/2018 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:27:11 Page 53 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 7/24/2018 through 8/7/2018 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00392791 08/01/2018 CANTOR, DOUGLAS 24.95 0.00 24.95 AP 00392792 08/01/2018 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 327.63 0.00 327.63 AP 00392793 08/01/2018 CHAMPION AWARDS AND SPECIALTIES 58.19 0.00 58.19 AP 00392794 08/01/2018 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 9,304.46 4,370.12 13,674.58 *** AP 00392795 08/01/2018 CHIKEZIEOJO, NGOZI 55.99 0.00 55.99 AP 00392796 08/01/2018 CHONG, JUDY 28.02 0.00 28.02 AP 00392797 08/01/2018 CINTAS CORPORATION #150 1,065.93 169.58 1,235.51 *** AP 00392798 08/01/2018 COMMERCIAL DOOR 427.50 0.00 427.50 AP 00392799 08/01/2018 CPRS 165.00 0.00 165.00 AP 00392800 08/01/2018 CRP OAKMONT INDUST. PROPERTIES LLC 15,000.00 0.00 15,000.00 AP 00392801 08/01/2018 DANIELS TIRE SERVICE 0.00 1,850.46 1,850.46 AP 00392802 08/01/2018 EASY PARTY RENTALS 397.50 0.00 397.50 AP 00392803 08/01/2018 EDUCATIONAL CREDIT MANAGEMENT CORP. 5.00 0.00 5.00 AP 00392804 08/01/2018 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 60.00 0.00 60.00 AP 00392805 08/01/2018 ENVIROMET 0.00 1,999.00 1,999.00 AP 00392806 08/01/2018 EXPRESS BRAKE SUPPLY 601.53 0.00 601.53 AP 00392807 08/01/2018 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS 0.00 1,044.78 1,044.78 AP 00392808 08/01/2018 FRANKLIN TRUCK PARTS 0.00 4,424.29 4,424.29 AP 00392809 08/01/2018 FRONTIER COMM 3,240.55 550.63 3,791.18 *** AP 00392810 08/01/2018 FRONTIER COMM 1,458.12 0.00 1,458.12 AP 00392811 08/01/2018 GLOBALSTAR USA 170.64 0.00 170.64 AP 00392812 08/01/2018 GOLDEN STATE RISK MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY 90,544.00 1,362.00 91,906.00 *** AP 00392813 08/01/2018 GRAINGER 1,560.60 396.37 1,956.97 *** AP 00392814 08/01/2018 GUTIERREZ, KRISTINA 421.25 0.00 421.25 AP 00392815 08/01/2018 HI WAY SAFETY INC 59.39 0.00 59.39 AP 00392816 08/01/2018 HIRED GUN EXTERMINATING INC 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00392817 08/01/2018 HODGSON, ROBERT F. 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00392818 08/01/2018 HSH-RANCHO OWNER CA LLC 176.15 0.00 176.15 AP 00392819 08/01/2018 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 304.68 0.00 304.68 AP 00392820 08/01/2018 INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CRIME ANALYSTS 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00392821 08/01/2018 INTERNET CENTRICS LLC 0.00 619.40 619.40 AP 00392822 08/01/2018 J J KELLER AND ASSOC INC 995.00 0.00 995.00 AP 00392823 08/01/2018 JIN, YAN 226.96 0.00 226.96 AP 00392824 08/01/2018 JOHNNY ALLEN TENNIS ACADEMY 571.20 0.00 571.20 AP 00392825 08/01/2018 JOHNSON, MARSHA HEDRICK- 60.92 0.00 60.92 AP 00392826 08/01/2018 JOUD CONSTRUCTION COMPANY INC 6.00 0.00 6.00 AP 00392827 08/01/2018 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INC 249,110.50 0.00 249,110.50 AP 00392828 08/01/2018 KEITH, JORRY 492.00 0.00 492.00 AP 00392829 08/01/2018 KINDRED CORPORATION 26,319.94 0.00 26,319.94 AP 00392830 08/01/2018 KIRO CARS INC 540.00 0.00 540.00 AP 00392831 08/01/2018 LEIGHTON CONSULTING INC 10,195.00 0.00 10,195.00 AP 00392832 08/01/2018 LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC. 8,222.32 0.00 8,222.32 AP 00392833 08/01/2018 LOPEZ, ANGEL 200.00 0.00 200.00 AP 00392834 08/01/2018 LORD, OLIN S 352.00 0.00 352.00 AP 00392835 08/01/2018 MAIN STREET SIGNS 247.83 0.00 247.83 AP 00392836 08/01/2018 MAYHORN, CHERYL 250.00 0.00 250.00 AP 00392837 08/01/2018 MIDWEST TAPE 245.85 0.00 245.85 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 8 Current Date: 08/08/2018 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:27:11 Page 54 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 7/24/2018 through 8/7/2018 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00392838 08/01/2018 MOLINER, ERICKA 250.00 0.00 250.00 AP 00392839 08/01/2018 MUNOZ, CLAUDIA L 240.00 0.00 240.00 AP 00392840 08/01/2018 MUTUAL PROPANE 0.00 20.00 20.00 AP 00392841 08/01/2018 MYERS TIRE SUPPLY COMPANY 0.00 27.33 27.33 AP 00392842 08/01/2018 NAPA AUTO PARTS 5.38 2,213.71 2,219.09 *** AP 00392843 08/01/2018 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION 759.32 0.00 759.32 AP 00392844 08/01/2018 NEOPOST USA INC 452.69 0.00 452.69 AP 00392845 08/01/2018 NETFILE 12,600.00 0.00 12,600.00 AP 00392846 08/01/2018 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CTRS OF CA 0.00 372.98 372.98 AP 00392847 08/01/2018 ONTARIO, CITY OF 0.00 25,000.00 25,000.00 AP 00392848 08/01/2018 ORTIZ, IRENE 25.00 0.00 25.00 AP 00392849 08/01/2018 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 695.92 0.00 695.92 AP 00392850 08/01/2018 PINA, RAFAEL 425.00 0.00 425.00 AP 00392851 08/01/2018 PLANETBIDS INC 17,730.00 0.00 17,730.00 AP 00392852 08/01/2018 PRE -PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 78.38 0.00 78.38 AP 00392853 08/01/2018 PRIME GLASS 271.53 0.00 271.53 AP 00392854 08/01/2018 RANCHO SMOG CENTER 599.25 0.00 599.25 AP 00392855 08/01/2018 RICHARD WIGHTMAN CONSTRUCTION INC 8,000.00 0.00 8,000.00 AP 00392856 08/01/2018 RICHARD WIGHTMAN CONSTRUCTION INC 4,420.00 0.00 4,420.00 AP 00392857 08/01/2018 RICHARD WIGHTMAN CONSTRUCTION INC 14,920.00 0.00 14,920.00 AP 00392858 08/01/2018 RICHARD WIGHTMAN CONSTRUCTION INC 7,720.00 0.00 7,720.00 AP 00392859 08/01/2018 RICHARD WIGHTMAN CONSTRUCTION INC 6,000.00 0.00 6,000.00 AP 00392860 08/01/2018 RODAS' AUTO REPAIR 2,948.98 0.00 2,948.98 AP 00392861 08/01/2018 ROTARY CLUB OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 223.25 0.00 223.25 AP 00392862 08/01/2018 ROYAL INDUSTRIAL SOLUTIONS CITY OF INDUSTRY 418.32 0.00 418.32 AP 00392863 08/01/2018 SAN BERNARDINO CTY AUDITOR CONTROLLER 29,485.55 0.00 29,485.55 AP 00392864 08/01/2018 SBPEA 1,619.05 0.00 1,619.05 AP 00392865 08/01/2018 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO, THE 65.58 0.00 65.58 AP 00392866 08/01/2018 SIGN SHOP, THE 0.00 131.20 131.20 AP 00392867 08/01/2018 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 5,890.56 124.67 6,015.23 *** AP 00392868 08/01/2018 SONSRAY MACHINERY LLC 2,424.42 0.00 2,424.42 AP 00392869 08/01/2018 SOUTH COAST AQMD 0.00 1,220.37 1,220.37 AP 00392875 08/01/2018 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 10,047.69 4,301.99 14,349.68 *** AP 00392876 08/01/2018 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.97 0.00 17.97 AP 00392877 08/01/2018 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2,133.18 0.00 2,133.18 AP 00392878 08/01/2018 STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY 4,111.61 0.00 4,111.61 AP 00392879 08/01/2018 SWEET DOUGH CAFE 990.00 0.00 990.00 AP 00392880 08/01/2018 SWIFTY SIGN 0.00 360.00 360.00 AP 00392881 08/01/2018 TEXAS MEDICAL SCREENING LLC 445.00 0.00 445.00 AP 00392882 08/01/2018 TIREHUB LLC 1,004.36 0.00 1,004.36 AP 00392883 08/01/2018 TORO TOWING 100.00 0.00 100.00 AP 00392884 08/01/2018 TRIMMER, PATRICIA A 195.86 0.00 195.86 AP 00392885 08/01/2018 UNITED SITE SERVICES OF CA INC 281.34 0.00 281.34 AP 00392886 08/01/2018 UNITED WAY 93.00 0.00 93.00 AP 00392887 08/01/2018 UPLAND AUTO TRIM 250.00 0.00 250.00 AP 00392888 08/01/2018 UPS 81.37 0.00 81.37 AP 00392889 08/01/2018 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 2,955.81 0.00 2,955.81 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 9 Current Date: 08/08/2018 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:27:11 Page 55 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 7/24/2018 through 8/7/2018 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00392890 08/01/2018 WILSON & BELL AUTO SERVICE 0.00 105.00 105.00 AP 00392891 08/01/2018 WINZER CORPORATION 0.00 194.09 194.09 AP 00392892 08/01/2018 YERO, ART 14.82 0.00 14.82 AP 00392893 08/01/2018 YOUNG REMBRANDTS 1,029.60 0.00 1,029.60 AP 00392894 08/01/2018 A & M FIRST AID INC 814.48 0.00 814.48 AP 00392895 08/01/2018 ABLE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 2,007.95 0.00 2,007.95 AP 00392896 08/01/2018 ALFARO COMMUNICATIONS CONSTRUCTION INC 39,786.00 0.00 39,786.00 AP 00392897 08/01/2018 ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT 167,599.64 0.00 167,599.64 AP 00392898 08/01/2018 ALLIANCE BUS LINES INC 799.20 0.00 799.20 AP 00392899 08/01/2018 ALLIED UNIVERSAL SECURITY SERVICES 2,672.14 0.00 2,672.14 AP 00392900 08/01/2018 APPLE INC. 772.35 0.00 772.35 AP 00392901 08/01/2018 BARTEL ASSOCIATES LLC 0.00 9,135.00 9,135.00 AP 00392902 08/01/2018 BEST BEST AND KRIEGER 357.50 0.00 357.50 AP 00392903 08/01/2018 BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERVICES INC. 37,222.32 0.00 37,222.32 AP 00392904 08/01/2018 BSN SPORTS LLC 892.11 0.00 892.11 AP 00392905 08/01/2018 BUREAU VERITAS NORTH AMERICA INC 16,895.63 0.00 16,895.63 AP 00392906 08/01/2018 BUTSKO UTILITY DESIGN INC. 27,948.87 0.00 27,948.87 AP 00392907 08/01/2018 C V W D 1,123.71 0.00 1,123.71 AP 00392911 08/01/2018 C V W D 119,584.92 0.00 119,584.92 AP 00392912 08/01/2018 CALIFORNIA SHOPPING CART RETRIEVAL CORP 140.00 0.00 140.00 AP 00392913 08/01/2018 CCS ORANGE COUNTY JANITORIAL INC. 1,547.92 645.00 2,192.92 *** AP 00392914 08/01/2018 CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT 7,913.00 0.00 7,913.00 AP 00392915 08/01/2018 CHINO MOWER AND ENGINE SERVICE 1,486.80 0.00 1,486.80 AP 00392916 08/01/2018 CLARKE PLUMBING SPECIALTIES INC. 633.26 15.42 648.68 *** AP 00392917 08/01/2018 COMMUNITY BANK 8,821.03 0.00 8,821.03 AP 00392918 08/01/2018 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTR INC 134.47 0.00 134.47 AP 00392919 08/01/2018 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 32,528.39 0.00 32,528.39 AP 00392920 08/01/2018 D & D SERVICES INC. 860.00 0.00 860.00 AP 00392921 08/01/2018 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 435.31 0.00 435.31 AP 00392922 08/01/2018 DATA TICKET INC 1,364.20 0.00 1,364.20 AP 00392923 08/01/2018 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 7,997.31 0.00 7,997.31 AP 00392924 08/01/2018 DEPENDABLE COMPANY INC. 23.75 0.00 23.75 AP 00392925 08/01/2018 ENNIS PAINT INC. 1,454.63 0.00 1,454.63 AP 00392926 08/01/2018 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 99.23 0.00 99.23 AP 00392927 08/01/2018 FORTIN LAW GROUP 10,139.69 0.00 10,139.69 AP 00392928 08/01/2018 FUEL SERV 6,494.50 0.00 6,494.50 AP 00392929 08/01/2018 GLADWELL GOVERNMENT SERVICES 4,800.00 0.00 4,800.00 AP 00392930 08/01/2018 GRAINGER 646.69 255.76 902.45 *** AP 00392931 08/01/2018 GRIFFIN STRUCTURES INC 18,333.14 0.00 18,333.14 AP 00392932 08/01/2018 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO 2,359.73 0.00 2,359.73 AP 00392933 08/01/2018 HDL SOFTWARE LLC. 1,500.00 0.00 1,500.00 AP 00392934 08/01/2018 HEARTSAVERS LLC 25.00 0.00 25.00 AP 00392935 08/01/2018 IBM CORPORATION 2,803.08 0.00 2,803.08 AP 00392936 08/01/2018 ICE DATA PRICING AND REFERENCE DATA LLC 133.85 0.00 133.85 AP 00392937 08/01/2018 INDEPENDENT ROOFING CONSULTANTS 3,500.00 0.00 3,500.00 AP 00392938 08/01/2018 INTERWEST CONSULTING GROUP INC 360.00 0.00 360.00 AP 00392939 08/01/2018 KIRO CARS INC 180.00 0.00 180.00 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 10 Current Date: 08/08/2018 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:27:11 Page 56 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 7/24/2018 through 8/7/2018 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00392940 08/01/2018 KVAC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES INC 1,158.50 0.00 1,158.50 AP 00392941 08/01/2018 LANDCARE USA LLC 45,275.74 0.00 45,275.74 AP 00392942 08/01/2018 LEIGHTON CONSULTING INC 8,550.80 0.00 8,550.80 AP 00392943 08/01/2018 LIBERTY PLUGINS INC 1,080.00 72.00 1,152.00 *** AP 00392944 08/01/2018 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 3,000.00 0.00 3,000.00 AP 00392945 08/01/2018 MARIPOSA LANDSCAPES INC 111,209.17 0.00 111,209.17 AP 00392946 08/01/2018 MASON AND MASON REAL ESTATE APPRAISERS 8,535.43 0.00 8,535.43 AP 00392947 08/01/2018 MATLOCK DESIGN BUILD INC 3,232.50 0.00 3,232.50 AP 00392948 08/01/2018 MEDLEY FIRE PROTECTION INC 0.00 2,763.40 2,763.40 AP 00392949 08/01/2018 MIDWEST TAPE 89.98 0.00 89.98 AP 00392950 08/01/2018 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CTRS OF CA 1,084.33 0.00 1,084.33 AP 00392951 08/01/2018 OCLC INC 55.45 0.00 55.45 AP 00392952 08/01/2018 ONTARIO WINNELSON CO 52.43 0.00 52.43 AP 00392953 08/01/2018 PAPE GROUP INC, THE 1,451.64 0.00 1,451.64 AP 00392954 08/01/2018 PRESTWICK GROUP INC, THE 4,121.83 0.00 4,121.83 AP 00392955 08/01/2018 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FONTANA FAMILY YMCA 15,580.76 0.00 15,580.76 AP 00392956 08/01/2018 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTOR 331.57 0.00 331.57 AP 00392957 08/01/2018 ROTO ROOTER 565.00 0.00 565.00 AP 00392958 08/01/2018 ROYAL INDUSTRIAL SOLUTIONS CITY OF INDUSTRY 8.85 0.00 8.85 AP 00392959 08/01/2018 SAN BERNARDINO CTY 0.00 11,297.00 11,297.00 AP 00392960 08/01/2018 SC FUELS 0.00 2,898.13 2,898.13 AP 00392961 08/01/2018 SHEAKLEY PENSION ADMINISTRATION 0.00 175.65 175.65 AP 00392962 08/01/2018 SHEAKLEY PENSION ADMINISTRATION 390.70 0.00 390.70 AP 00392963 08/01/2018 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 14.79 0.00 14.79 AP 00392964 08/01/2018 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2,489.37 0.00 2,489.37 AP 00392965 08/01/2018 THE COUNSELING TEAM INTERNATIONAL 0.00 840.00 840.00 AP 00392966 08/01/2018 THOMPSON PLUMBING SUPPLY INC 489.46 0.00 489.46 AP 00392967 08/01/2018 TOMCO LLC 6,150.00 0.00 6,150.00 AP 00392968 08/01/2018 U C REGENTS 5,495.24 0.00 5,495.24 AP 00392969 08/01/2018 U S LEGAL SUPPORT INC 226.43 0.00 226.43 AP 00392970 08/01/2018 UTILIQUEST 1,230.32 0.00 1,230.32 AP 00392971 08/01/2018 UTILITY FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS 7,245.00 0.00 7,245.00 AP 00392972 08/01/2018 VAN SCOYOC ASSOCIATES INC 4,000.00 0.00 4,000.00 AP 00392973 08/01/2018 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 101.35 0.00 101.35 AP 00392974 08/01/2018 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 120.24 0.00 120.24 AP 00392975 08/01/2018 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 1,059.59 0.00 1,059.59 AP 00392976 08/01/2018 WEST END MATERIAL SUPPLY 258.60 0.00 258.60 AP 00392977 08/01/2018 WHITTIER FERTILIZER 932.04 0.00 932.04 AP 00392978 08/02/2018 ABC LOCKSMITHS 286.32 0.00 286.32 AP 00392979 08/02/2018 CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO INC 250.37 81.78 332.15 *** AP 00392980 08/02/2018 DEMCOINC 147.23 0.00 147.23 AP 00392981 08/02/2018 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 46.03 0.00 46.03 AP 00392982 08/02/2018 GALE/CENGAGE LEARNING 2,753.69 0.00 2,753.69 AP 00392983 08/02/2018 HOSE MAN INC 0.00 130.42 130.42 AP 00392984 08/02/2018 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 113.24 0.00 113.24 AP 00392985 08/02/2018 MINUTEMAN PRESS 195.03 0.00 195.03 AP 00392986 08/02/2018 OFFICE DEPOT 1,395.56 691.94 2,087.50 *** User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 11 Current Date: 08/08/2018 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:27:11 Page 57 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 7/24/2018 through 8/7/2018 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00392987 08/02/2018 ORKIN PEST CONTROL 0.00 200.00 200.00 AP 00392988 08/02/2018 SUNRISE FORD 1,868.28 0.00 1,868.28 AP 00392989 08/02/2018 ASSI SECURITY 26,700.25 0.00 26,700.25 AP 00392990 08/02/2018 ALLIANT INSURANCE SERVICES INC. 3,604.00 0.00 3,604.00 AP 00392998 08/02/2018 BRODART BOOKS 38,114.66 0.00 38,114.66 AP 00392999 08/02/2018 EMCOR SERVICE 13,245.00 0.00 13,245.00 AP 00393000 08/02/2018 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 4,011.66 0.00 4,011.66 AP 00393001 08/02/2018 KME FIRE APPARATUS 0.00 520.27 520.27 AP 00393002 08/02/2018 OFFICE DEPOT 303.57 0.00 303.57 AP 00393003 08/02/2018 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 613.23 0.00 613.23 Total City: $7,014,477.39 Total Fire: $437,882.09 Grand Total: $7,452,33T48 Note: *** Check Number includes both City and Fire District expenditures User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 12 Current Date: 08/08/2018 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:27:11 Page 58 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Electronic Debit Register July 1, 2018 - July 31, 2018 DATE DESCRIPTION CITY FIRE AMOUNT 7/2 WIRE TRANSFER - To California ISO 205.72 205.72 7/2 WORKERS COMP - City Account Transfer 837.39 837.39 7/2 WORKERS COMP - Fire Account Transfer 638.40 638.40 7/3 WORKERS COMP - City Account Transfer 107.57 107.57 7/3 WORKERS COMP - Fire Account Transfer 7,418.74 7,418.74 7/5 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 1,621.14 1,621.14 7/5 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 1,918.51 1,918.51 7/5 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 5,520.40 5,520.40 7/5 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 7,781.99 7,781.99 7/5 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 10,919.73 10,919.73 7/5 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 103,689.48 103,689.48 7/5 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT - Child Support Payments 2,465.15 2,465.15 7/5 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT - Child Support Payments 3,584.44 3,584.44 7/5 U.S. BANK - Purchasing Card Payment - June 2018 74,120.42 14,081.70 88,202.12 7/5 U.S. BANK - Corporate Card Payment - June 2018 91,984.81 21,928.59 113,913.40 7/5 U.S. BANK - Costco Card Payment - June 2018 1,145.98 150.32 1,296.30 7/5 WORKERS COMP - City Account Transfer 2,099.48 2,099.48 7/5 WORKERS COMP - Fire Account Transfer 499.81 499.81 7/6 WORKERS COMP - City Account Transfer 36.00 36.00 7/6 WORKERS COMP - Fire Account Transfer 197.90 197.90 7/9 CALPERS - City - Retirement Account Deposit 41,096.16 41,096.16 7/9 CALPERS - City - Retirement Account Deposit 125,431.42 125,431.42 7/9 WIRE TRANSFER - To California ISO 82,315.99 82,315.99 7/9 WORKERS COMP - City Account Transfer 493.59 493.59 7/9 WORKERS COMP - Fire Account Transfer 437.07 437.07 7/10 WORKERS COMP - City Account Transfer 198.08 198.08 7/10 WORKERS COMP - Fire Account Transfer 1,278.51 1,278.51 7/11 WORKERS COMP - City Account Transfer 114.64 114.64 7/11 WORKERS COMP - Fire Account Transfer 111.53 111.53 7/12 WORKERS COMP - City Account Transfer 390.00 390.00 7/13 WORKERS COMP - City Account Transfer 785.30 785.30 7/16 WIRE TRANSFER - To California ISO 7,984.98 7,984.98 7/16 WORKERS COMP - City Account Transfer 809.87 809.87 7/16 WORKERS COMP - Fire Account Transfer 7,087.54 7,087.54 7/17 WORKERS COMP - CityAccountTransfer 1,194.47 1,194.47 7/18 WORKERS COMP - City Account Transfer 5,024.77 5,024.77 7/19 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT - Child Support Payments 2,465.15 2,465.15 7/19 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT - Child Support Payments 5,418.28 5,418.28 7/19 WORKERS COMP - City Account Transfer 406.66 406.66 7/19 WORKERS COMP - Fire Account Transfer 140.82 140.82 7/20 WORKERS COMP - City Account Transfer 3,852.05 3,852.05 7/20 WORKERS COMP - Fire Account Transfer 4,665.97 4,665.97 7/23 WORKERS COMP - City Account Transfer 15.60 15.60 7/24 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 138,857.58 138,857.58 7/24 CALPERS - City - Retirement Account Deposit 39,000.00 39,000.00 7/24 CALPERS - City - Retirement Account Deposit 119,202.00 119,202.00 7/24 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 1,000.00 1,000.00 7/24 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 1,800.00 1,800.00 7/24 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 5,000.00 5,000.00 7/24 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 7,000.00 7,000.00 7/24 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 9,000.00 9,000.00 7/24 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 101,000.00 101,000.00 7/24 WORKERS COMP - City Account Transfer 220.80 220.80 7/24 WORKERS COMP - Fire Account Transfer 550.56 550.56 7/25 CALPERS - City - Retirement Account Deposit 3,504.80 3,504.80 7/25 CALPERS - City - Retirement Account Deposit 13,780.00 13,780.00 7/25 CALPERS - City - Retirement Account Deposit 17,352.40 17,352.40 7/25 CALPERS - City - Retirement Account Deposit 2,757,041.00 2,757,041.00 7/25 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 306.80 306.80 1 Page 59 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Electronic Debit Register July 1, 2018 - July 31, 2018 DATE DESCRIPTION CITY FIRE AMOUNT 7/25 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 389.00 389.00 7/25 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 406.00 406.00 7/25 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 452.40 452.40 7/25 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 468.00 468.00 7/25 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 618.80 618.80 7/25 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 837.20 837.20 7/25 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 839.00 839.00 7/25 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 1,369.00 1,369.00 7/25 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 4,461.60 4,461.60 7/25 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 140,453.00 140,453.00 7/25 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 1,761,308.00 1,761,308.00 7/25 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 395.44 395.44 7/25 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 654.41 654.41 7/25 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 672.28 672.28 7/25 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 1,014.25 1,014.25 7/25 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 2,222.08 2,222.08 7/25 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 6,149.73 6,149.73 7/25 WORKERS COMP - City Account Transfer 983.33 983.33 7/25 WORKERS COMP - Fire Account Transfer 7,777.16 7,777.16 7/26 WORKERS COMP - CityAccountTransfer 1,040.80 1,040.80 7/26 WORKERS COMP - Fire Account Transfer 1,266.06 1,266.06 7/27 WORKERS COMP - City Account Transfer 133.37 133.37 7/27 WORKERS COMP - Fire Account Transfer 1,551.61 1,551.61 7/30 WIRE TRANSFER - To California ISO 5,038.72 5,038.72 7/30 WORKERS COMP - City Account Transfer 28,912.00 28,912.00 7/30 WORKERS COMP - Fire Account Transfer 5,930.21 5,930.21 7/31 U.S. BANK - Purchasing Card Payment - July 2018 63,019.07 9,992.93 73,012.00 7/31 U.S. BANK - Corporate Card Payment - July 2018 92,524.46 13,753.20 106,277.66 7/31 U.S. BANK - Costco Card Payment - July 2018 771.71 323.17 1,094.88 TOTAL CITY 3,588,105.71 TOTAL FIRE 2,426,910.34 GRAND TOTAL 6,015,016.05 Page 60 DATE: August 15, 2018 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: James C. Frost, City Treasurer INITIATED BY: Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director Sandra G. Ramirez, Management Analyst III SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE CURRENT INVESTMENT SCHEDULE AS OF JULY 31, 2018. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file the attached current investment schedule for the City of Rancho Cucamonga as of July 31, 2018. BACKGROUND: The attached investment schedule as of July 31, 2018 reflects cash and investments managed by the Finance/Treasury Management Division and is in conformity with the requirements of California Government Code Section 53601 and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's adopted Investment Policy as approved by the City Council on April 17, 2017. ANALYSIS: The City Treasurer is required to submit a quarterly investment report to the City Council in accordance with California Government Code Section 53646. The quarterly investment report is required to be submitted within 30 days following the end of the quarter covered by the report. However, the City Treasurer has elected to provide this report on a monthly basis. FISCAL IMPACT: None Page 61 COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: N/A ATTACHMENTS: Description Attachment 1 - Portfolio Management - Portfolio Summary July 31, 2018 Page 62 m w cD w) M i M m <OD OD 00 OO M i 10 N 10 t0 r N 10 t0 M N r aN A 10 M fG cm N N P7 N tq N t0 O aN N t0 N w 4 O L L r N h N M m m O E r 0* W N N O tV tV r to � M L moE U N O ma E O U C sp O h N N ID w 1 f` N cc r N O� O O m N VN w N 1V C 1V 1V N w. O IV � O N r Cl) E != O U N C > O O N 00 Go M co 100 Cg o N r n 1V! m t+Oi O N w M M r O. i9 O � r O N w 1`�i r OMf N O O O 1C 1V W r M N M Cj � O O r r CL 0. C p. Y n O Cl) � W n a 7 M Q0p0 cc E r CD 10 1- N 0 w N O t O M M 0 M M w w m w M O 14: O N C 1S � N _ A O �::! O r y N 10 E 00 to A C N 1p U O 10 N y Y U U) LL N O M V) S 8 � _ > Q 3 NN O C O ' C � O m' O aO0 N CO O N O _O (c •O O 1n C O G O m w O a O 1- w N (D O M y w O N M m m Oaa rMi <�i C C O vm�viao�lb m CV N C r N W N O co a O O a O A OD O m 2.6 N aL+ C A oui x 0 0 0 0 0 Il N O � c 0 c c 0 3 r O w O ON O O O CO, N CR o LR Clm g C y Z. w vi w 1c of C OC O w t0 L n N C C N c y C j C N R U. tL U � m Q� aci w U c� C� 1a`�7i ami U cm xi > O c cm O H fA w �0 C O 0 � C t O O y m Y3 C Lz m Q N 0 N Q i,N O .a c y QLu m 2 'c a L W> -S C V F a 2 U m w cD w) M i M m <OD OD 00 OO M i 10 N 10 t0 r N 10 t0 M N r aN A 10 M fG cm N N P7 N tq N t0 O aN N t0 N Go O N M A R Go O N r O O g V O m CL o C o m OCL o D: c' Page 63 w 4 G E E- m m ? -o A? M C E L moE N ma E O �t rn o~ c CL Vl N O N E != O N C > O O C N � O m 7 �>_ >, E O. i9 O � C f` C O O o E N X H O I� N •tA r O 0. C p. E O U C e a O E w 14: O N C 1S � N _ N O �::! O r y C 10 d 00 to A C N 1p U O 10 N y Y U U) LL S 8 � _ > Q 3 NN O C O ' C � p � O c H Z a m y C y oC N O C C O ti O L U E N Cp N C r O) W N C C O O (Qp t0 OD O tf1 O 2.6 N aL+ C A N d O Il N oyo 3 r U y m y Z. C OC O w E L N C N C C T N — E U a�E E� o oo. ami I cm m Z.- O H fA w �0 0C N Lz W> -S Go O N M A R Go O N r O O g V O m CL o C o m OCL o D: c' Page 63 O N N N W M O O N N N N N p! O CA O O O O N N N O Cn M N O 0 0 o N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 p 0 0 p O O N N N N N N N N a O Q cl M R o rp N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N o ao M M o! O Cn c� a m V m v m aD o m M rn o o t� N U CL g N M N m N N N N 5 N O _N N O_ N N N N N N N M N N M M N a O lh M (� M to O �y O 2 O a CO O P i` LL 'C M O CO O CO t0 M N O I� LL� I� M M O aD Of O t0 (D M �O O N cm O1 f0 f0 rl 00 CO M M M n M N M CO O M M N< K a O I I co coMN CD CID N M t0 CO 1 Oo 0 O b O V P N vp� v7 gay Of 0 0 0 0 0 O O M O 0 o O O O o O O p O O O M N M N m CO N CA m M O M CO CD N P N f0 N O O N O O CD M o 0 CO N Cl) CO iD f0 N M M i0 N c0 O N O O W0 V1 0 N CV N I N .- I �- C CV N N N .- .- .- N N N CV .- 11(6� /0 /NlQQ 11l0� N l6 lll¢6¢ (N(QQ 11!Q0Q {/{Q0Q /6 lll¢6¢ tNCQ1} (N(Q� l6 lmlI� wfQ ((m� lwl{� (w(Q lmlQ twtQ lml{� lwlQ ffwQ m Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q I O O O O M O 0 0 0 p 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 O O O O O O CO to CO N M O M M Np CO M N M Cn h o O M W)O O M f` N CO M O M M O r O O CA fD O CD N M M N N OR O N p O Cn M O x N N N N m Oo 0 O O O O O co 0) {+7 O! 0 0 0 O o 0 0 O co (D N O O o O O O O O O N O O O OR O O O 10 O O O O N CR O 00 O O O O O O O W o o O P C C O O O O C W p! a N O C O N O C C C (O 0 CA C M C 0 0 0 C 00 N C 0 C a CO O O O O O O O g O CD A O N 0) O O O O O O O O o 0 O O O O (O CO O O O W O 0 0 M �_ O P O O O O O O O M O O O Y 8 v v IV M r m m O O O N O O O N M CA o CO O 0 0 0 O O O O o O W O o 0 m N N N h (O CO 0 0 0 O! CA m O 0 0! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M o p CO L0 t0 O O '0 O p CA cc CA o o O O O o (0 O O O N N W0 O CC LO �iC00� Y M M V• v M v M M CO M N m v a CO V' N M— CO M M IT m O O O O O O O O M CO I M pf 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 00 M N O O O O O O O N O p 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 O O O O p o O h N O O jp C C C O O 0 C O N W UH 0 W N 0 O M r CD tC C C P Q N M W w O a 0 N M P N v P O! �p P r m V' P W N N CO O CO a0 CO CO O M 0 0 0 O P P O M N M O N CO W M P N M v M M M r M O CO r P P r P CO M Cn N N N N M P CO P CD CO P CD CO h N r Cn M M M N O n CA O P t0 O O N CD N M M co N N N fD CO O p N M P CO m P N CO N V' N N O co W CA M V_ W M W aO C0 CO G a Oct OD v O! 0 CO N 'It Yf CO 0 CO M N M N CO CO CO VN N CO M M M M N M M N C Q� m m 00 O O O O O O p M CA co p! O O O O O O O O 0 O 0 0 0 00 0 0 p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C pSp 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O 0 0 C O a a a 8 W 0 O O O a a a 0 0 a a a 0 0 a a o 0 a 0 a 0 a a 0 a s Cc` V N O O O t% P O o 0 O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 p 0 C O O O O O O O O ! (o dJ d r LO ui Ui v v N N N v W M P m P CO w P CO 0 00 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 w 00 0 0 0 0 0 o 00 0 o O O o 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 o co 0 0 0 0 to N 0 0 M Cn 0 0 0 C C 0 0 0 0 C 0 M O O O N N CO O O P.' M Yl Q M M M --f v- M v v v LO M M 0 C V M V N M M M M M C OOH 0 li O O` �o a CO CD OD I0 N (0 CO CO N P P P P P V' �0 CD CO CO CO CO P P P P P (O CO CD ao W 10 soo N N N w ssb sss bss sso 00o sb0 ss0 bsb 0s N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N a 9 O O • d co o N .- N a s o M co P M (n n c� m o v m P Cn o 0 0 (o u! P w o o P N CO N N .- N N N O M N N N N M C� (� N N M O M c+! (� c0 M V a pao P e-- (� (� m M M O�ppoaa��ppOopp sooaOOO9 m� of o� U U Qm N N U Z O N Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y O LL Q m m m m m m m m m Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z x x Qm Qm Y J O F F H F m m m m m m m m m m m m 02 02 02 Y Q� ; t t t= F L t O O O O O O O O O O O Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z M w w w w w w www w w ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ x x x x x x `Q� m= 2 x x x x x O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 J W U } U 00 U 00 U 00 U U J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J m m m 22 W W w w W W W W W W W w w W w x x x x x 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2d �h w Z ° OOO O OO O OO OO Q _ LLJ LL m < m qJ QJ qJ QJ QJ qJ qJ qJ qJ QJ QJ QJ 4J qJ QJ QJ 4J qJ qJ J qJ QJ QJ qJ 4J QJ J0 ¢ w W w W W W W W w W W W W W W W w w W W W w W W W W =9 W U w Coo Coo O an Coo O 00 Coo con Doc 00 LL H OJ LL LL LL LL CL LL CWL CWL CWL LL LL ILL CWL {wL LL IWL LL LL CWL CWL LL LL LL IWL LL LL O # N H O C 0 7LL 7 m o CA r r (00 C O V C y O M CA O P o (0 W M O CO CA W OO CO P V CO O (D P 00 CO m CMO a (PO (n0 m CMD a s (j 0) M c0 CO CO P P POD CO M M CO C r Q) .--(O c0 CO CO CO (O CD CO CO CO CO O CL W N S O C a- O V C Co O m cm O M t0 (0 W M 10 10 CO CD O) a Q }N N M OO Cp r N Y Uy S W> > O C7 m0 > j J CDN o COCM -(O Cj awo d� �O mN o C7C� 2 C7 Qx d ax m �� o g �aMuM g (p }N wLLLL LLc9c7 c9xx xx vaoa0 rnrnrn mmao mm wwwwww www ww`� _ Cp C� h !-0 CO Cl) Cl) CO Cl) M M M M M M 7 d Cl) w ci U M co ao J N LL M M M M M co c,) M co M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M Pagye 64 cc C C J9 E cc E 0 dcm > � Q cic ,N o a cq C C o �, a° t. v a° WC 7 a ma �C > O Q� m m c a y V W W O N N N N O 0 0) W W W O O W W W O N N N N N N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CN) N 0N 0 0 0 0N 0N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N u> w BN; W n W W �n � 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 o a r r r r a 0 n o o O N N W � � O � a-� co co 't q It w m OI A 0 0 0 O O O o m W)M O V• 0 0 o o 0 0 0 o o M �O W 0 W O O O N N N IT w O O O O LO O r N O N W O O N N N W r W m N: hM M V' n N M N r N l N r r r r N cV r N r r r r r r r r r r r r r r W N w M w W M N M W N N N w M N N M M M N N .2a�.2Q.2-TaaaQ.2<Q-�Q°-�.2.2.2�2 �2 O O O O O O o O W W O O O o O O O O O O O O h O N goo O O N N h O Soo O O O O cO N O M O O N N N m r n WO M N O N V' r r r r N cV r N r r r r r r r r r r r r r r O O O O O O O M O O W O O O O O O O O h o O W O 00 O 00 O W O O n 0 O 00 O 00 O LO 0 O Q O O O 0 0 0 C c 0 0 0 o O MN o O o O W O c c 0 c 0 O O O O W O c 0 WR 0 ono 0 0 0 0 o n o 0 00 0 00 o N o 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 o n o o v 0 c 0 O O O O W e 0 0 W O O O O O O O 0 O O c O O O O O O O O V' 0 0 W �O O N tO O O O O W O O M co M U[ M 0 V• M M V• co N v M N v v v v M v v M A r OO O O 00 O 00 O 00 O 00 O 00 O 00 O O O O O O O O O W O O O lO O UO Lq O O O O O O O OR C N N 1n 0) w 0 m�{ cm N co co cm m N N fV C Go O aWD N N O c O OrD OWL act cc aWD n M W cn0 � OND m W A n O M w n N W M r cM0 O N N m O M W W W co W W W M W W v v a W Of Oct W IM W aD N NN v NLO OR. MMN MMN MMM MMM M W V 0 0 0 O O O O O O 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O C O C O O O O C C C O O O C O O C O C O C 0 c 0 c 0 c c c 0 c c c 0 0 c 0 0 0 0 0 c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 q O 00 o co 0 00 O O O 000 O 00 0 00 0 000 O 00 O 00 O 00 000 000 O 00 O O O O O O O O W O O N N O WO W ct 0 CL O O O O M M M U) M W v M M It M N v co N v IT IT v v V• IT woo m n n n n n n n V• W Wn W WOW W m m m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c o 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N c—" N nmm m oW n�nW W A nrno o�nm o vW W N N N O e2 N N N N N N N N M NN N M r N N O r N i0 m Iz n h 0 0 0 0 0 o O o o r o r r r O O O O O O O O O O O N O r C, 0 0 0 0 N N N N N o � o M M M W n r m r o o r o LO v 0 C cb 9 0 W OW �Im N M r n M lr�{{ lrQQ CNQ CM CM Mq N N O � N O O N O O N m O N O m r r N N N O m 0 0 0 co O N O aD cD ci CU W M O N O W O M N to M n t0 m �Oyp Cn0 M N � c+1 } Q o O_ 2 o n.i LL r 0 a LL N N C I O a 0 N O a O v fN0 M M V' M M N Oid V: N M LO n:aa aaa aaa M(L Q' d' d' w 2' d' 0' LL' cr A N 000 000 000 00 0 U U U U U U U U U U U v to C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 c N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0 0 Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z A Z 0 y < U N O < < < < < < < Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z z Z Z Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q U - 80 L Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q O 0 0 0 0 00 0 00 0 W W W W W J O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O U J J J J JJ J J J J J b b b b W w W W W w W W W W W J J J J J J J J222J J J J Z Z Z Z Z Ly O 0J_ o_J o_J o_J o_J o_J >»>> 1QIIIqII Z_ z z J JJ J J JJ J J J m N W 9) (1) W m j Q 999999999999999gIg9999 < tgi ug ugtgi ug < z w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w v Ir Ix� o z D cc D Do CDC D cc D cc can D cc R c F- F- F F- F- c O www w w www w w www www www w to v)cncn U) a z LL LL LL LL LL w LL LL LL LL U. LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL :3 M D M M O c 7 OCL N H 3 c C :.: m nN M W N n W W m W M V• W W O Cl) N W O 7 W W n W W V M UO LO Wy� n n n W W W W W W N N N LO WO W LO m O m m W m m W W W W W W W V m m m W W m m W (� m co M On ^ Q OO rrr r r r r r r r r r r r r rrr r r r r � r r r r r N d � C V C V t Q i w anD N G,LLN cOL Y Q a� N a N D D O LL S�j V) U) O m M N W O N N v a i i m v J i 7 co N W o m w O 0' > J 2r = L J Q ~ O W W W W Q Q m m m m m 0 N O N N M M M O M M co W W W Q, C7 (7 C7 00 0 0c7 0 00 000 000 0 00 0 �% N N NN N a Aa aa A a A tO W WO m W W W W LO W W Am W W W W W N O m M (h M ch ch M M M M M M M M M M M G N N N N N } LL M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M co co M M W W W W W d W O a iN0 M N a c; O N aW0 N al It m M N O ckM O N m IMa 0 c CO) Pag`65 Qi O O N 0 0 o N N 0 o d O O O O O N O N N N N N O O O O 0 0 0? � O d OO CD m O a CN9 co Lo 4m r T I � 0 0co a V c N Ln o CD M (A a I N CO I C C C-4 I N fN�C� f�QQ ffqq Q Q Q 0 (�Q (NQQ Q Q a C C 0 IL d A p _ V ` a n' CV T Y C N CV CV Q m Qi O O N 0 0 o N N 0 o d O O O O O N O N N N N N O O O O 0 0 0? O O O O N N N O O N N 0 0 OO CD m O a CN9 co Lo 4m r T I 00! N O T T I r T �n �oOD .�{{ N CO A Ln o CD ago N sw�N r M I N CO I N C-4 I N fN�C� f�QQ ffqq Q Q Q i (�Q (NQQ Q Q a Q Q N CO O f0 COD O O O O aOD tr Lcoq M O O O N I. CV T Y N .- N N CV CV O D o n I V0 0- M -. C7 N0 CA 49 O N O O ClO 0 CV CC C7 � 1n CA O m h CO O O O IA M N CC) W Z Z O O O m a N C O COO CO W 0 CMD O CA O V 0 001 M O O N co O CCI w O M N w T 7 V CO O O O O O O O O O r O N 0 O 01 � � 0 M � 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 N � O m N 8 O O O O C2 O O O O i OO CD NN O t0 O 1 t• r CD t0 A COCpp N ON7 IA W O 0 O < CD CO � at M N 0 0000 C2 0 0 0 0 ck 0 0 0 0 NN Cp O O CO Go ow M M 00 0 0 to W) IV IT -W O r r O O r co NNN N NOONNO ON V N NN _ O N N N O m OO i I. ¢ Y N W O rz ca ad vz O N fD M Z Z O O m w p aoZ Z m O O d J r+ a O O Lu y w W too Cl) � O M amD � U U C 0 Corn W 00 o 0 g �� U Mrn 01 a a m ern o }Uzi co U LO v v 0 0 ~ F U U~ w w W W CD F Z C D Cl)U- I Q m U tz LL 1!LL>U F- z- (1)QQ� Y Y ¢ W O O S a ¢ ¢ m m a S Q aQ Q w a U U¢ W F IJ Z 2 N U 2 U ¢ CN h N CO N O A N m CD La M c a 9 g Pagl§ 66 m mo ro n m N a ao o w m M m Z c O O d r M O r+ a a Lu y w too Cl) � O M amD � W) apo C v Corn W p o 0 g `r U Mrn 01 m o LO v v CO N O A N m CD La M c a 9 g Pagl§ 66 cc Im C � O C y V �.i M tm ci c N O O +� z C C O O a° CL W co N Go LO M �O ui co N N N M N A t0 r N O N i N 0 N O rA 10 A 01 A N 3 i PaA 67 a m grc� Y 0 n r a y cc Im C � O C y V �.i M tm ci c N O O +� z C C O O a° CL W co N Go LO M �O ui co N N N M N A t0 r N O N i N 0 N O rA 10 A 01 A N 3 i PaA 67 m a i I i I i (A _M O W E'o K � 0 oa I n O W C Cf N jL C O � M co O �+ 0 CL 7 tm cc t v~ O cc m C Cc O v d0 00m c � O O N 53 i I i I i i N oa I n di i W co v co O A r G It N 0, WfI A N M ¢i m ci aaO M V o� co O O O O I 0 C O oO 0 0 o q I I I VVI: "A O o o O O O v a m ro i v a N N N N (O M i o N I o g Z Z LL Q N LL I z W Y— e N Q H N W N O W h y y �. c o 0 0 VLL r o m o CL �? p o 0 ao y �yym CL 7 i7 Y y d D c �, •C � 'C y N O v c u t 0 O io ad+ m N m Z O Q o 3 o CL %E V y A U)i N C O. V 0 y LL F d y p m Y i N C 7 N M O O >,c O c c CL Go o U� CL N (� 06 O O t () r M :r 0 al aN�iU U) O C N 0M O � v Q cn v a } c Z a } c a c •V M Y i N C 7 N M I_- �� >,c O c c CL o U� f/i Oo mOo 06 d 4)�� aN�iU LL N M Page 69 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O OO O O O O M OC7 N N r O v 10 N N ch N N ch s ami N r O N c0 w O Z '4 Page 70 J3 c m Q U pp LL N N c yL o 3 'y E m v � m LU c E L ro c c p o t � m V V w O O 0 m E E N m rn rn r- (3)0) m OI :z zva iz v a CO CO a0 ro ro ro c c c C LL LL LL m G1 d N m m N c c c 9k c N .- O 0 o O V C7 M M V M Cl) Q CD rn rn « o 0 0 2 F m E m Z C 7 O u Q ro = C LL LL LL E Z E CL E O coOm �i m IT O M M N O O N m n Is O LOto O m M m n V! IV► 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O Q QQ Q Q Q Z Z Z Z �Z 0 0 0 0 0 N0 N N N N N c c C c C C LL Li LL LL Li LL m c�i m aTi c�i aTi 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z. 2 2 m 2 2 n co 0 o O 0 0 0 0 0 0 LO CO CO W O CD n n n n n n O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 va.tvva C L LL m ro m « O 2 n, v LL o m W rn o 8 n. tr¢Um�'m O 07 LO LL N e: co 0 M co LO M O P. -4: N M Vi V> O O O O O O O O Q QQ Q Q Z Z Z Z 0) Lh m m 0 0 o O -V N N N C c c c LLL 7 7 LL LL LL Ze w me m aTi m aTi c�i 0 0 0 0 2 m m 2 0 0 0 0 Co COLO 00 m mm m W') O O O co co co O 0 0 CO 0 It v v v c m ro N 7 LL .0 0 x �LLalfO LL 2 C c CA w m w fn O E, m LL N 9 0 O a W m W ' 0O M m w O M v M N fA IV, 0 0 0 O O O O O O C c c c c LL LL LL LL LL CIJ 0 0 0 0 0 CO CO CO CO Co co LD 0 O 0 M 0 M Cl) Cl) CCD W CCOO CCOO 00 It v v v v ro c LL m C X C - O C w 7 (D ~ U -- LL E c to 00) °L 'O O m O_ QmlrU) O m m LL N C) o o O V O n N O O O m O O O Nco O O M CO OI C'i C4 M m v N N O V ; m N m d m 69 V) 9I o 0 0 m O O O LU O O O m rn rn r- (3)0) m OI :z zva iz v a CO CO a0 ro ro ro c c c C LL LL LL m G1 d N m m N c c c 9k c N .- O 0 o O V C7 M M V M Cl) Q CD rn rn « o 0 0 2 F m E m Z C 7 O u Q ro = C LL LL LL E Z E CL E O coOm �i m IT O M M N O O N m n Is O LOto O m M m n V! IV► 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O Q QQ Q Q Q Z Z Z Z �Z 0 0 0 0 0 N0 N N N N N c c C c C C LL Li LL LL Li LL m c�i m aTi c�i aTi 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z. 2 2 m 2 2 n co 0 o O 0 0 0 0 0 0 LO CO CO W O CD n n n n n n O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 va.tvva C L LL m ro m « O 2 n, v LL o m W rn o 8 n. tr¢Um�'m O 07 LO LL N e: co 0 M co LO M O P. -4: N M Vi V> O O O O O O O O Q QQ Q Q Z Z Z Z 0) Lh m m 0 0 o O -V N N N C c c c LLL 7 7 LL LL LL Ze w me m aTi m aTi c�i 0 0 0 0 2 m m 2 0 0 0 0 Co COLO 00 m mm m W') O O O co co co O 0 0 CO 0 It v v v c m ro N 7 LL .0 0 x �LLalfO LL 2 C c CA w m w fn O E, m LL N 9 0 O a W m W ' 0O M m w O M v M N fA IV, 0 0 0 O O O O O O C c c c c LL LL LL LL LL CIJ 0 0 0 0 0 CO CO CO CO Co co LD 0 O 0 M 0 M Cl) Cl) CCD W CCOO CCOO 00 It v v v v ro c LL m C X C - O C w 7 (D ~ U -- LL E c to 00) °L 'O O m O_ QmlrU) O m m LL N r- o co N N O ' O O r � N V3 ro ti ro ro ro ro ro > > > > > > > LL LL LL LL LL LL LL aTi aTi m aTi aTi m aTi C C C C C C C 2 m 2 2 2� 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 }{{ m m mm m m m mm mm m m m O O O O O O O n n n n n n n v v v v v v a c C C C LL UT y ro LL Lxp j 0 o Z ~ LL >, a LL E m m N C N CL d ro C 0mwinIXan. E E in ,CO U C m (Y v 0 N N LO O M LMO N vs co N } U. Ln Page 71 O .0 O m m N m c m N m d m C Cl) c LU m o E E t Z m c t •c E o m E E o m o c 0 C. E m O O N N 'y N O N Z m Q U U U r- o co N N O ' O O r � N V3 ro ti ro ro ro ro ro > > > > > > > LL LL LL LL LL LL LL aTi aTi m aTi aTi m aTi C C C C C C C 2 m 2 2 2� 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 }{{ m m mm m m m mm mm m m m O O O O O O O n n n n n n n v v v v v v a c C C C LL UT y ro LL Lxp j 0 o Z ~ LL >, a LL E m m N C N CL d ro C 0mwinIXan. E E in ,CO U C m (Y v 0 N N LO O M LMO N vs co N } U. Ln Page 71 Page 72 w v O w r w Q O O n M O O r N O n 0 O) a0 N n U O a0 O) au (o O O O (O W oD O) (O U� to .-- O coO r M (O W T to Cl) O N r N LO (n M Cl) rl CD M OF � cli C14 N Cl) co c0 OctO O 4D (O C 7I N N O O t() tf) m N N N N N cn N N M M U 69 -11 (I1 69. H1 Yi -11 V1 -11 611 -11 N1 -11 Vi al o a o 0 0 m O O O O O O O O O O 0 Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z W f t0 t0 to to t0 f (O f t(') O (n t0 (O M u2 O N t0 N to f t0 M (n (O (O to 2 m m L NI O O O O O N N N N N O O O O O N N N N N O O O O O N N N N NQ O O O O O N N N N N O O O O O N N N N N O O O O N N N N O O O O O Cl) M M M M O O O O O M M M M M O O O O O M M M M M O O O O O M M M M M O O O O O M M (2 M M O O O O (`7 M IL n n (� (� n n n rn i n rs i n (� (- n n r- r n r rz r Q n n n r v v v v c c c c v v v v v v v v v v v v a v v v v v v v v v v v �. 3 7 7 3 c c c c c 3 3 3 = 7 c c c c c 3 3 3 3 3 c c c c c 7 3 = 3 3 c c c c c = 3 3 3 = c c c c 3 3 3 3 LL LL LL LL LL LL U. LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL d N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N d N N N N cC� ` Y 'Z 1 'Z 15 LY 'L 15 15 15 'L 'L -L 15 15 15 15 'L 'L 15 t 'L -E iL 'L m m m m m m m m m m (0 m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m (c C T T T T N N N N T T T T T NN T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T C C C c N N N C C C c C N N N N N C c C C c N N N N N c c C C c a) c c c c C C C C c N c N c C c C C O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O « c c O N Cl) O OO O O N cl) O O O O O N M V O O O O O O N M V' O O O O O O N M a O N M O N N N N N M M M Cl) M �} 7 t0 to to to t0 O O O O O (o co CO (D co O O O O r r r r Q � O O O O O v vvv v O O O O O v vvv a O O O O v vvv v O O O O O v vvv v O O O O O � vvv v O O O O v v v v VQ W NC -4 N N N .- N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N W LL c N a n r r; m co co co (o n n n r m (o co (o co n r r n r (o m (o (c m r r co (o (o co (a r n r m co (o m (o r n r n co to co co N t O 3 co 3 d Q Q Q Q Q Q ci m NN - - N _> W o O 0 0 (p (p N p 0 0 0 m c E L O O CN 04 x n. o U U o Z U U U U °a L 2 LO to LO to m L CD N N Cl N CD V U « N N N C 0 0 rn 0) rn r rn 0)rn F LL a cc cc c > > > > E> > E c o c E (Etpp U LL LL C LL' LL C m LL k C (Ec LL LL C W I1 LL C LL LL (7 E ' v N = X.0 v c' x v C 3 = x .O c' = x v c= = x ti Uo ~ E o E c E o E E °i r j m t N LL Z _~ m L f6 LL Z (u L fO LL m N LL Z c~ a) N LL Z c~ E f0 LL Q (1 U 'O d N U U v m m U U 'O O. d L 0 U 'O G c) L N U V U G N L N U U 'O N m Q O N m G O d m G O N m O.0 2 N m a 0 N G m C O h �cmmC.w Wcnmaw ofcnma� �(nmaw U) co �cnma OD o 0 m c C C C 'Y C Y C N m Q m m m m m m O O c C C c 0 O O O F am > > r_> > > o N LL m IL CD U) T `O z & 0) Q U m (q C OF = 0 E N CDC O Z y U m N D m 2 3 V in D 0 2 c CD mCq '= U op 4) c v° 4 _ Q E U in w Q 0 0 Q 0 0 0 o E co co N N N N N N Cn O Z O Z O Z O Z O Z O Z DU U U U U U Page 72 v c Yt OD as c c O) 01 M {M9 CAD rn Q _v N N LL 00 00 rn rn w z n n � 3 M c E a' U >Iv v L m c vi w gl o 0 A m o 0 c wo M � � o o W 00 0r a E w C Z U- m u� H 49 m t N V �I CD CL a d r v c Yt � as c c c n Q u N V 00 Q _v N N LL N H (r0 N N � 3 M E a' C O m � 7 U � m L m c v > W c OC c 0 A Z c wo M � o W 00 0r a E r c E U- CL a H z w 0 a J Q U W x F N z 2 w a CO W z G z a x Q U J Q f Page 73 DATE: August 15, 2018 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: William Wittkopf, Public Works Services Director Paul Fisher, Management Analyst I Ruth Cain, CPPB, Procurement Manager SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF A CONTRACT WITH ABSOLUTE SECURITY INTERNATIONAL, INC. FOR SECURITY GUARD SERVICES AT VARIOUS CITY FACILITIES. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council award and authorize the execution of a contract with Absolute Security International, Inc. for security guard services at various City facilities, effective as of the date of the mutual execution through June 30, 2019, with an option to renew for one (1) year increments up to a total of five (5) additional years, with a value of $225,860 for FY 2018-2019, and an estimated total contract value of $1,764,130 over six years; and, authorize the City Manager to renew the contract annually. BACKGROUND: The Public Works Services Department and the Procurement Division routinely go out for request for proposals to ensure vendor services remain competitive. Public Works staff updated the security guard services specifications to include new requirements, revised service locations and hours, and better compliance language. With these changes to the scope of service, rebidding this contract aligns it with current service requirements and funding, while providing the best value for the community. The scope of work for this contract includes, but is not limited to, standing guard services, patrol routes, special event security, walkout service for staff, parking lot monitoring, and loss control. Services are to be provided at the Animal Care and Adoption Center, LoanMart Field, and the Metrolink Station as specified in the RFP. In addition, the guards will provide nightly restroom lockup and gate closure at City parks. The updated specifications were provided to the Procurement Division to prepare a formal Request for Proposal (RFP). The Procurement Division prepared and posted RFP #17/18-009 for Security Guard Services at Various City Facilities. There were three hundred and thirty-seven (337) notified vendors; thirty- eight (38) prospective bidders downloaded or viewed the bid package, and there were twelve (12) responses received, of which six (6) were non-responsive. ANALYSIS: An Evaluation Committee consisting of staff from various departments conducted a thorough analysis of the RFP responses and scored and ranked the responsive proposals. The top three (3) highest ranked Page 74 vendors were invited to be interviewed and provided an opportunity to present additional information to enhance their proposal submittals. Absolute Security International, Inc. of EI Monte, California was determined to be the most responsive contractor providing the best value while meeting the scope of services and specifications required. Therefore, staff recommends City Council award a contract to Absolute Security International, Inc., effective from the date of the mutual execution through June 30, 2019, with an option to renew for one (1) year increments up to a total of five (5) additional years, with a value of $225,860 for FY 2018-2019. In anticipation of a possible request by the contractor for a rate adjustment in future years due to cost increases, primarily minimum wage adjustments and benefits, Staff has prepared the chart below to show the estimated annual funding breakdown. Please note this is only an estimate and the amounts listed below could vary. The average annual increase to the minimum wage on January 1 st of each year from 2020 to 2022 is 8%. Therefore, the assumption underlying this estimate is that contract costs will also increase 8% per year: .......................................................................................................................................................... California Minimum Wage History Effective Prior Year Increase Total Cost ............. New Old :Amount Fiscal Annualized Estimated for .............................. r............................................... $14.00 Grand Total Year Cost for Annual Regular Extra Work per .................................................................................................................................................. 1/1/2020 Regular Increase (8%) Service Fiscal Year r............................................. r............................................ Service .......................................... }.................................................. $1.00: 9.1% 2018/2019 (Eleven Months) $ - $ 213,860 $ 12,000 $ 225,860 2019/2020 $ 233,300 $ 18,670 $ 251,970 $ 12,000 $ 263,970 2020/2021 $ 251,970 $ 20,160 $ 272,130 $ 12,000 $ 284,130 2021/2022 $ 272,130 $ 21,780 $ 293,910 $ 12,000 $ 305,910 2022/2023 $ 293,910 $ 23,520 $ 317,430 $ 12,000 $ 329,430 2023/2024 $ 317,430 $ 25,400 $ 342,830 $ 12,000 $ 354,830 Grand Total $ 1,764,130 The average annual increase to the minimum wage on January 1 st of each year from 2020 to 2022 is 8%. Therefore, the assumption underlying this estimate is that contract costs will also increase 8% per year: .......................................................................................................................................................... California Minimum Wage History Effective Minimum Wage I t................................................ Increase Date ............. New Old :Amount Perct.; ........................................................... 1/1/2022 .............................. ............... .............. $15.00 .............................. r............................................... $14.00 r......................................... $1.00 ......... 7.1 % ...........................................................t.............................................t............................................}...............................................}..............................................---- 1/1/2021 $14.00: $13.00: $1.00: 7.7% .................................................................................................................................................. 1/1/2020 $13.00: ... r............................................... $12.00: r..................................................; $1.00: 8.3% t........................................................... 1/1/2019$12.00: :...........................................................:.............................................:............................................................................................................................................., r............................................. r............................................ . $11.00: .......................................... }.................................................. $1.00: 9.1% This increase is primarily a result of the scheduled increases to the California minimum wage. Security services consist predominately of minimum wage earners so minimum wage increases directly impact labor costs for providing guard services. The California minimum wage is currently $11.00 per hour and will increase to $12.00 per hour on January 1, 2019. This is approximately 7% higher than the average minimum wage in effect in the first and second halves of FY 2017/2018. Based on the preceding chart, the estimated total contract value is $1,764,130 over six years. The costs for service at Metrolink are partially offset by parking fees and the Quakes contribute to the costs at LoanMart Field. FISCAL IMPACT: The new contract rates are within the proposed contract services budget line items in the various General and Landscape Maintenance District funds for FY 2018/2019. Page 75 COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: The provision of guard services enhances public safety and reinforces the City's position as the premier community in the inland region. ATTACHMENTS: Description Contract Page 76 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES DEPARTMENT CONTRACT SECURITY GUARD SERVICES AT VARIOUS CITY FACILITIES AWARD DATE: Wednesday, August 15, 2018 Page 77 Page 78 AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 1 st day of August 2018, by and between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation ("City") and Absolute Security International, Inc. dba Absolute International Security, a private security services provider ("Contractor"). RECITALS A. City has heretofore issued its request for proposals to perform the following services: Security Guard Services at Various City Facilities (RFP 17/18-009) ("the Project"). B. Contractor has submitted a proposal to perform the services described in Recital "A", above, necessary to complete the Project. C. City desires to engage Contractor to complete the Project in the manner set forth and more fully described herein. D. Contractor represents that it is fully qualified and licensed under the laws of the State of California to perform the services contemplated by this Agreement in a good and professional manner. AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of performance by the parties of the mutual promises, covenants, and conditions herein contained, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Contractor's Services. 1.1 Scope and Level of Services. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement, City hereby engages Contractor to perform all services described in Recitals "A" and `B" above, including, but not limited to security guard services at various City facilities; all as more fully set forth in RFP 17/18-009, attached hereto as Exhibit A, and the Contractor's proposal, dated April 12, 2018, attached hereto as Exhibit B, hereinafter entitled "Scope of Work", and incorporated by reference herein. The nature, scope, and level of the services required to be performed by Contractor are set forth in the Scope of Work and are referred to herein as "the Services." In the event of any inconsistencies between the Scope of Work and this Agreement, the terms and provisions of this Agreement shall control. 1.2 Revisions to Scope of Work. Upon request of the City the Contractor will promptly meet with City staff to discuss any revisions to the Project desired by the City. Contractor agrees that the Scope of Work may be amended based upon said meetings, and, by amendment to this Agreement, the parties may agree on a revision or revisions to PSA without professional liability insurance (contractor) Last Revised: 05/22/14 Vendor Initials Page 1 Page 79 Contractor's compensation based thereon. A revision pursuant to this Section that does not increase the total cost payable to Contractor by more than ten percent (10%) of the total compensation specified in Section 3, may be approved in writing by City's Manager without amendment. 1.3 Time for Performance. Contractor shall perform all services under this Agreement in a timely, regular basis consistent with industry standards for professional skill and care, and in accordance with any schedule of performance set forth in the Scope of Work, or as set forth in a "Schedule of Performance", if such Schedule is attached hereto as Exhibit "N/A". 1.4 Standard of Care. As a material inducement to City to enter into this Agreement, Contractor hereby represents that it has the experience necessary to undertake the services to be provided. In light of such status and experience, Contractor hereby covenants that it shall follow the customary professional standards in performing the Services. 1.5 Familiarity with Services. By executing this Agreement, Contractor represents that, to the extent required by the standard of practice, Contractor (a) has investigated and considered the scope of services to be performed, (b) has carefully considered how the services should be performed, and (c) understands the facilities, difficulties and restrictions attending performance of the services under this Agreement. Contractor represents that Contractor, to the extent required by the standard of practice, has investigated any areas of work, as applicable, and is reasonably acquainted with the conditions therein. Should Contractor discover any latent or unknown conditions, which will materially affect the performance of services, Contractor shall immediately inform City of such fact and shall not proceed except at Contractor's risk until written instructions are received from the City Representative. 2. Term of Agreement. The term of this Agreement shall be eleven (11) months(s) and shall become effective as of the date of the mutual execution by way of both party's signature (the "Effective Date"). No work shall be conducted; service or goods will not be provided until this Agreement has been executed and requirements have been fulfilled. Parties to this Agreement shall have the option to renew in one (1) year increments to a total of five (5) additional years, unless sooner terminated as provided in Section 14 herein. Options to renew are contingent upon the City Manager's approval, subject to pricing review, and in accordance to all Terms and Conditions stated herein unless otherwise provided in writing by the City. 3. Compensation. 3.1 Compensation. City shall compensate Contractor as set forth in Exhibit C, provided, however, that full, total and complete amount payable to Contractor shall not exceed $225,860 (Two Hundred Twenty Five Thousand, Eight Hundred Sixty Dollars) for services during the City's fiscal year ending June 30, 2019, including all out of pocket expenses, unless additional compensation is approved by the City Manager or City Council. City shall not PSA without professional liability insurance (contractor) Last Revised: 05/22/14 Vendor Initials Page 2 Page 80 withhold any federal, state or other taxes, or other deductions. However, City shall withhold not more than ten percent (10%) of any invoice amount pending receipt of any deliverables reflected in such invoice. Under no circumstance shall Contractor be entitled to compensation for services not yet satisfactorily performed. The parties further agree that compensation may be adjusted in accordance with Section 1.2 to reflect subsequent changes to the Scope of Services. City shall compensate Contractor for any authorized extra services as set forth in Exhibit C. 4. Method of Payment. 4.1 Invoices. Contractor shall submit to City monthly invoices for the Services performed pursuant to this Agreement. The invoices shall describe in detail the Services rendered during the period and shall separately describe any authorized extra services. Any invoice claiming compensation for extra services shall include appropriate documentation of prior authorization of such services. All invoices shall be remitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. 4.2 City shall review such invoices and notify Contractor in writing within ten (10) business days of any disputed amounts. 4.3 City shall pay all undisputed portions of the invoice within thirty (30) calendar days after receipt of the invoice up to the not -to -exceed amounts set forth in Section 3. 4.4 All records, invoices, time cards, cost control sheets and other records maintained by Contractor relating to services hereunder shall be available for review and audit by the City. 5. Representatives. 5.1 City Representative. For the purposes of this Agreement, the contract administrator and City representative shall be William Wittkopf, Public Works Services Director, or such other person as designated in writing by the City ("City Representative"). It shall be Contractor's responsibility to assure that the City Representative is kept informed of the progress of the performance of the services, and Contractor shall refer any decisions that must be made by City to the City Representative. Unless otherwise specified herein, any approval of City required hereunder shall mean the approval of the City Representative. 5.2 Contractor Representative. For the purposes of this Agreement, Lucy J. Lin, President & QM, is hereby designated as the principal and representative of Contractor authorized to act in its behalf with respect to the services specified herein and make all decisions in connection therewith ("Contractor's Representative"). It is expressly understood that the experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of the Contractor's Representative were a substantial inducement for City to enter into this Agreement. Therefore, the Vendor Initials PSA without professional liability insurance (contractor) Page 3 Last Revised: 05/22/14 Page 81 Contractor's Representative shall be responsible during the term of this Agreement for directing all activities of Contractor and devoting sufficient time to personally supervise the services hereunder. Contractor may not change the Responsible Principal without the prior written approval of City. 6. Contractor's Personnel. 6.1 All Services shall be performed by Contractor or under Contractor's direct supervision, and all personnel shall possess the qualifications, permits, and licenses required by State and local law to perform such Services, including, without limitation, a City business license as required by the City's Municipal Code. 6.2 Contractor shall be solely responsible for the satisfactory work performance of all personnel engaged in performing the Services and compliance with the standard of care set forth in Section 1.4. 6.3 Contractor shall be responsible for payment of all employees' and subcontractors' wages and benefits, and shall comply with all requirements pertaining to employer's liability, workers' compensation, unemployment insurance, and Social Security. By its execution of this Agreement, Contractor certifies that it is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code that require every employer to be insured against liability for Worker's Compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and agrees to comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the Services. 6.4 Contractor shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless City and its elected officials, officers and employees, servants, designated volunteers, and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials, from any and all liability, damages, claims, costs and expenses of any nature to the extent arising from Contractor's violations of personnel practices and/or any violation of the California Labor Code. City shall have the right to offset against the amount of any fees due to Contractor under this Agreement any amount due to City from Contractor as a result of Contractor's failure to promptly pay to City any reimbursement or indemnification arising under this Section 6. 7. Ownership of Work Product. 7.1 Ownership. All documents, ideas, concepts, electronic files, drawings, photographs and any and all other writings, including drafts thereof, prepared, created or provided by Contractor in the course of performing the Services, including any and all intellectual and proprietary rights arising from the creation of the same (collectively, "Work Product"), are considered to be "works made for hire" for the benefit of the City. Upon payment being made, and provided Contractor is not in breach of this Agreement, all Work Product shall be and remain the property of City without restriction or limitation upon its use or dissemination by City. Basic survey notes, sketches, charts, computations and similar data prepared or obtained by Contractor under this Agreement shall, upon request, be made available PSA without professional liability insurance (contractor) Last Revised: 05/22/14 Vendor Initials Page 4 Page 82 to City. None of the Work Product shall be the subject of any common law or statutory copyright or copyright application by Contractor. In the event of the return of any of the Work Product to Contractor or its representative, Contractor shall be responsible for its safe return to City. Under no circumstances shall Contractor fail to deliver any draft or final designs, plans, drawings, reports or specifications to City upon written demand by City for their delivery, notwithstanding any disputes between Contractor and City concerning payment, performance of the contract, or otherwise. This covenant shall survive the termination of this Agreement. City's reuse of the Work Product for any purpose other than the Project, shall be at City's sole risk. 7.2. Assignment of Intellectual Property Interests: Upon execution of this Agreement and to the extent not otherwise conveyed to City by Section 7.1, above, the Contractor shall be deemed to grant and assign to City , and shall require all of its subcontractors to assign to City , all ownership rights, and all common law and statutory copyrights, trademarks, and other intellectual and proprietary property rights relating to the Work Product and the Project itself, and Contractor shall disclaim and retain no rights whatsoever as to any of the Work Product, to the maximum extent permitted by law. City shall be entitled to utilize the Work Product for any and all purposes, including but not limited to constructing, using, maintaining, altering, adding to, restoring, rebuilding and publicizing the Project or any aspect of the Project. 7.3 Title to Intellectual Property. Contractor warrants and represents that it has secured all necessary licenses, consents or approvals to use any instrumentality, thing or component as to which any intellectual property right exists, including computer software, used in the rendering of the Services and the production of the Work Product and/or materials produced under this Agreement, and that City has full legal title to and the right to reproduce any of the Work Product. Contractor shall defend, indemnify and hold City, and its elected officials, officers, employees, servants, attorneys, designated volunteers, and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials, harmless from any loss, claim or liability in any way related to a claim that City's use is violating federal, state or local laws, or any contractual provisions, relating to trade names, licenses, franchises, patents or other means of protecting intellectual property rights and/or interests in products or inventions. Contractor shall bear all costs arising from the use of patented, copyrighted, trade secret or trademarked documents, materials, software, equipment, devices or processes used or incorporated in the Services and materials produced under this Agreement. In the event City's use of any of the Work Product is held to constitute an infringement and any use thereof is enjoined, Contractor, at its expense, shall: (a) secure for City the right to continue using the Work Product by suspension of any injunction or by procuring a license or licenses for City; or (b) modify the Work Product so that it becomes non- infringing. This covenant shall survive the termination of this Agreement. 8. Status as Independent Contractor. Contractor is, and shall at all times remain as to City, a wholly independent contractor. Contractor shall have no power to incur any debt, obligation, or liability on behalf of City or otherwise act as an agent of City. Neither City nor any of its agents shall have control over the conduct of Contractor or any of Contractor's employees, except as set forth in this Agreement. Contractor shall not, at any time, or in any PSA without professional liability insurance (contractor) Last Revised: 05/22/14 < Vendor Initials Page 5 Page 83 manner, represent that it or any of its officers, agents or employees are in any manner employees of City. Contractor shall pay all required taxes on amounts paid to Contractor under this Agreement, and to defend, indemnify and hold City harmless from any and all taxes, assessments, penalties, and interest asserted against City by reason of the independent contractor relationship created by this Agreement. Contractor shall fully comply with the workers' compensation law regarding Contractor and Contractor's employees 9. Confidentiality. Contractor may have access to financial, accounting, statistical, and personnel data of individuals and City employees. Contractor covenants that all data, documents, discussion, or other information developed or received by Contractor or provided for performance of this Agreement are confidential and shall not be disclosed by Contractor without prior written authorization by City. City shall grant such authorization if applicable law requires disclosure. All City data shall be returned to City upon the termination of this Agreement. Contractor's covenant under this Section shall survive the termination of this Agreement. This provision shall not apply to information in whatever form that is in the public domain, nor shall it restrict the Contractor from giving notices required by law or complying with an order to provide information or data when such an order is issued by a court, administrative agency or other legitimate authority, or if disclosure is otherwise permitted by law and reasonably necessary for the Contractor to defend itself from any legal action or claim. 10. Conflict of Interest. 10.1 Contractor covenants that it presently has no interest and shall not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, which may be affected by the Services, or which would conflict in any manner with the performance of the Services. Contractor further covenants that, in performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest shall be employed by it. Furthermore, Contractor shall avoid the appearance of having any interest, which would conflict in any manner with the performance of the Services. Contractor shall not accept any employment or representation during the term of this Agreement which is or may likely make Contractor "financially interested" (as provided in California Government Code §§1090 and 87100) in any decision made by City on any matter in connection with which Contractor has been retained. 10.2 Contractor further represents that it has not employed or retained any person or entity, other than a bona fide employee working exclusively for Contractor, to solicit or obtain this Agreement. Contractor has not paid or agreed to pay any person or entity, other than a bona fide employee working exclusively for Contractor, any fee, commission, gift, percentage, or any other consideration contingent upon the execution of this Agreement. Upon any breach or violation of this warranty, City shall have the right, at its sole and absolute discretion, to terminate this Agreement without further liability, or to deduct from any sums payable to Contractor hereunder the full amount or value of any such fee, commission, percentage or gift. 10.3 Contractor has no knowledge that any officer or employee of City has any interest, whether contractual, noncontractual, financial, proprietary, or otherwise, in this PSA without professional liability insurance (contractor) Last Revised: 05/22/14 Vendor Initials Page 6 Page 84 transaction or in the business of Contractor, and that if any such interest comes to the knowledge of Contractor at any time during the term of this Agreement, Contractor shall immediately make a complete, written disclosure of such interest to City, even if such interest would not be deemed a prohibited "conflict of interest" under applicable laws as described in subsection 10.1. 11. Indemnification. 11.1 To the maximum extent permitted by law, the Contractor shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, and its elected officials, officers, employees, servants, volunteers, and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials, (collectively, "Indemnitees"),free and harmless with respect to any and all damages, liabilities, losses, reasonable defense costs or expenses (collectively, "Claims"), including but not limited to Claims relating to death or injury to any person and injury to any property, which arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the acts, omissions, activities or operations of Contractor or any of its officers, employees, subcontractors, Contractors, or agents in the performance of this Agreement. Contractor shall defend Indemnitees in any action or actions fled in connection with any such Claims with counsel of City's choice, and shall pay all costs and expenses, including actual attorney's fees and experts' costs incurred in connection with such defense. The indemnification obligation herein shall not in any way be limited by the insurance obligations contained in this Agreement provided, however, that the Contractor shall have no obligation to indemnify for Claims arising out of the sole negligence or willful misconduct of any of the Indemnitees. 11.2 Nonwaiver of Rights. Indemnitees do not, and shall not, waive any rights that they may possess against Contractor because of the acceptance by City, or the deposit with City, of any insurance policy or certificate required pursuant to this Agreement. 11.3 Waiver of Right of Subrogation. Except as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement, Contractor, on behalf of itself and all parties claiming under or through it, hereby waives all rights of subrogation against the Indemnitees, while acting within the scope of their duties, from all claims, losses and liabilities arising out of or incident to activities or operations performed by or on behalf of the Contractor. 11.4 Survival. The provisions of this Section 11 shall survive the termination of the Agreement and are in addition to any other rights or remedies which Indemnitees may have under the law. Payment is not required as a condition precedent to an Indemnitee's right to recover under this indemnity provision, and an entry of judgment against Contractor shall be conclusive in favor of the Indemnitee's right to recover under this indemnity provision. 12. Insurance. 12.1 Liability Insurance. Contractor shall procure and maintain in full force and effect for the duration of this Agreement, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or PSA without professional liability insurance (contractor) Last Revised: 05/22/14 Vendor Initials Page 7 Page 85 damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the services hereunder by Contractor, and/or its agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors. 12.2 Minimum Scope of Insurance. Unless otherwise approved by City, coverage shall be at least as broad as: (1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage (occurrence form CG 0001). (2) Insurance Services Office form number CA 0001 (Ed. 1/87) covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto). (3) Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of California, and Employer's Liability Insurance. 12.3 Minimum Limits of Insurance. Contractor shall maintain limits no less than: (1) Commercial General Liability: $2,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this Agreement or the general limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. (2) Automobile Liability: $2,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage. (3) Employer's Liability: $1,000,000 per accident and in the aggregate for bodily injury or disease and Workers' Compensation Insurance in the amount required by law. (4) The Insurance obligations under this Agreement shall be the greater of (i) the Insurance coverages and limits carried by the Contractor; or (ii) the minimum Insurance coverages and limits shown in this Agreement. Any insurance proceeds in excess of the specified limits and coverage required which are applicable to a given loss, shall be available to the City. No representation is made that the minimum Insurance requirements of this Agreement are sufficient to cover the obligations of the Contractor under this agreement. 12.4 Deductibles and Self -Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self- insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City and shall not reduce the limits of coverage. City reserves the right to obtain a full certified copy of any required insurance policy and endorsements. PSA without professional liability insurance (contractor) Last Revised: 05/22/14 Vendor Initials Page 8 Page 86 12.5 Other Insurance Provisions. (1) The commercial general liability and automobile liability policies are to contain the following provisions on a separate additionally insured endorsement naming the City, its officers, officials, employees, designated volunteers and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials, as additional insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of Contractor; products and completed operations of Contractor; premises owned, occupied or used by Contractor; and/or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by Contractor. The coverage shall contain no limitations on the scope of protection afforded to City, its officers, officials, employees, designated volunteers or agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials which are not also limitations applicable to the named insured. (2) For any claims related to this Agreement, Contractor's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects City, its officers, officials, employees, designated volunteers and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by City, its officers, officials, employees, designated volunteers or agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials shall be in excess of Contractor's insurance and shall not contribute with it. (3) Contractor's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. (4) Contractor shall provide immediate written notice if (1) any of the required insurance policies is terminated; (2) the limits of any of the required polices are reduced; (3) or the deductible or self- insured retention is increased. In the event of any cancellation or reduction in coverage or limits of any insurance, Contractor shall forthwith obtain and submit proof of substitute insurance: Should Contractor fail to immediately procure other insurance, as specified, to substitute for any canceled policy, the City may procure such insurance at Contractor's sole cost and expense. (5) Each insurance policy required by this clause shall expressly waive the insurer's right of subrogation against City, its elected officials, officers, employees, servants, attorneys, designated Vendor Initials PSA without professional liability insurance (contractor) Last Revised: 05/22114 Page 9 Page 87 volunteers, and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials. (6) Each policy shall be issued by an insurance company approved in writing by City, which is admitted and licensed to do business in the State of California and which is rated ANII or better according to the most recent A.M. Best Co. Rating Guide. (7) Each policy shall specify that any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the required policy, including breaches of warranty, shall not affect the coverage required to be provided. (8) Each policy shall specify that any and all costs of adjusting and/or defending any claim against any insured, including court costs and attorneys' fees, shall be paid in addition to and shall not deplete any policy limits. (9) Contractor shall provide any and all other insurance, endorsements, or exclusions as required by the City in any request for proposals applicable to this Agreement. 12.6 Evidence of coverage. Prior to commencing performance under this Agreement, the Contractor shall furnish the City with certificates and original endorsements, or copies of each required policy, effecting and evidencing the insurance coverage required by this Agreement including (1) Additional Insured Endorsement(s), (2) Worker's Compensation waiver of subrogation endorsement, and (3) General liability declarations or endorsement page listing all policy endorsements. The endorsements shall be signed by a person authorized by the insurer(s) to bind coverage on its behalf. All endorsements or policies shall be received and approved by the City before Contractor commences performance. If performance of this Agreement shall extend beyond one year, Contractor shall provide City with the required policies or endorsements evidencing renewal of the required policies of insurance prior to the expiration of any required policies of insurance. 12.7 Contractor agrees to include in all contracts with all subcontractors performing work pursuant to this Agreement, the same requirements and provisions of this Agreement including the indemnity and insurance requirements to the extent they apply to the scope of any such subcontractor's work. Contractor shall require its subcontractors to be bound to Contractor and City in the same manner and to the same extent as Contractor is bound to City pursuant to this Agreement, and to require each of its subcontractors to include these same provisions in its contract with any sub - subcontractor. 13. Cooperation. In the event any claim or action is brought against City relating to Contractor's performance or services rendered under this Agreement, Contractor shall render any reasonable assistance and cooperation that City might require. City shall compensate PSA without professional liability insurance (contractor) Last Revised: 05/22/14 Vendor Page 10 '.E - :: Contractor for any litigation support services in an amount to be agreed upon by the parties. 14. Termination. City shall have the right to terminate this Agreement at any time for any or no reason on not less than ten (10) days prior written notice to Contractor. In the event City exercises its right to terminate this Agreement, City shall pay Contractor for any services satisfactorily rendered prior to the effective date of the termination, provided Contractor is not then in breach of this Agreement. Contractor shall have no other claim against City by reason of such termination, including any claim for compensation. City may terminate for cause following a default remaining uncured more than five (5) business days after service of a notice to cure on the breaching party. Contractor may terminate this Agreement for cause upon giving the City D ten (10) business days prior written notice for any of the following: (1) uncured breach by the City of any material term of this Agreement, including but not limited to Payment Terms; (2) material changes in the conditions under which this Agreement was entered into, coupled with the failure of the parties to reach accord on the fees and charges for any Additional Services required because of such changes. 15. Notices. Any notices, bills, invoices, or reports authorized or required by this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed received on (a) the day of delivery if delivered by hand or overnight courier service during Contractor's and City's regular business hours; or (b) on the third business day following deposit in the United States mail, postage prepaid, to the addresses set forth in this Section, or to such other addresses as the parties may, from time to time, designate in writing pursuant to the provisions of this Section. All notices shall be addressed as follows: If to City: William Wittkopf City of Rancho Cucamonga Public Works Services Department 8794 Lion Street Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 If to Contractor: Lucy J. Lin, President & QM Absolute Security International, Inc. 4255 Tyler Avenue El Monte, CA 91731 16. Non -Discrimination and Equal Employment Opportunity. In the performance of this Agreement, Contractor shall not discriminate against any employee, subcontractor, or applicant for employment because of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin, ancestry, age, physical or mental handicap, medical condition, or sexual orientation. Contractor will take affirmative action to ensure that subcontractors and applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment, without regard to their race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin, ancestry, age, physical or mental Vendor Initials PSA without professional liability insurance (contractor) Last Revised: 05/22/14 Page 11 Page 89 handicap, medical condition, or sexual orientation. 17. Assignment and Subcontracting. Contractor shall not assign or transfer any interest in this Agreement or subcontract the performance of any of Contractor's obligations hereunder without City's prior written consent. Except as provided herein, any attempt by Contractor to so assign, transfer, or subcontract any rights, duties, or obligations arising hereunder shall be null, void and of no effect. 18. Compliance with Laws. Contractor shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, ordinances, codes and regulations in force at the time Contractor performs the Services. Contractor is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Section 1720, et seq., and 1770, et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000, et seq., ("Prevailing Wage Laws"), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and compliance with other requirements on "public works" and "maintenance" projects. If the Services are being performed as part of an applicable "public works" or "maintenance" project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, and if the total compensation is $1,000 or more, Contractor agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws. The applicable prevailing wage rate determinations can be found at hM2://www.dir.ca.gov/dlsr/DPreWageDetertnination.htm Contractor shall make copies of the prevailing rates of per diem wages for each craft, classification or type of worker needed to execute the Services, available to interested parties upon request, and shall post copies at the Contractor's principal place of business and at the Project site. Contractor shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its elected officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws. 19. Non -Waiver of Terms, Rights and Remedies. Waiver by either party of any one or more of the conditions of performance under this Agreement shall not be a waiver of any other condition of performance under this Agreement. In no event shall the making by City of any payment to Contractor constitute or be construed as a waiver by City of any breach of covenant, or any default which may then exist on the part of Contractor, and the making of any such payment by City shall in no way impair or prejudice any right or remedy available to City with regard to such breach or default. 20. Attorney's Fees. In the event that either party to this Agreement shall commence any legal action or proceeding to enforce or interpret the provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party in such action or proceeding shall be entitled to recover its costs of suit, including reasonable attorney's fees and costs of experts. 21. Exhibits; Precedence. All documents referenced as exhibits in this Agreement are hereby incorporated in this Agreement. In the event of any material discrepancy between the express provisions of this Agreement and the provisions of any document incorporated herein by reference, the provisions of this Agreement shall prevail. 22. Applicable Law and Venue. The validity, interpretation, and performance of PSA withoutprofessional liability insurance (contractor) Last Revised: 05/22/14 C Vendor Initials Page 12 Page 90 this Agreement shall be controlled by and construed under the laws of the State of California. Venue for any action relating to this Agreement shall be in the San Bernardino County Superior Court. 23. Construction. In the event of any asserted ambiguity in, or dispute regarding the interpretation of any matter herein, the interpretation of this Agreement shall not be resolved by any rules of interpretation providing for interpretation against the party who causes the uncertainty to exist or against the party who drafted the Agreement or who drafted that portion of the Agreement. 24. Entire Agreement. This Agreement consists of this document, and any other documents, attachments and/or exhibits referenced herein and attached hereto, each of which is incorporated herein by such reference, and the same represents the entire and integrated agreement between Contractor and City. This Agreement supersedes all prior oral or written negotiations, representations or agreements. This Agreement may not be amended, nor any provision or breach hereof waived, except in a writing signed by the parties which expressly refers to this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties, through their respective authorized representatives, have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above. Contractor Name: Absolute International By: Lucy Lin 07/11/2018 Name Date President/QM Title Name Date Title (two signatures required if corporation) City of Rancho Cucamonga By: Name Title Date Yend PSA without professional liability insurance (contractor) Page 13 Last Revised: 05/22/14 Page 91 Page 92 EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF SERVICES — PART 1 RFP 17/18-009 Page 93 Page 94 RANCHO CUCAMONGA REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS ("RFP") #17/18-009 FOR SECURITY GUARD SERVICES AT VARIOUS CITY FACILITIES City of Rancho Cucamonga Procurement Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Deadline for Submissions: April 12, 2018 at 9:00 a.m. Page 95 Page 96 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Proposals ("RFP") # 17/18-009 for Security Guard Services at Various City Facilities 1. GENERAL INFORMATION 1.1 Introduction The City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter "City") is inviting qualified Vendors to submit a proposal response for Security Guard Services at Various City Facilities in accordance with the minimum Scope of Services and Specifications indicated herein. Vendors wishing to participate in the RFP solicitation must be registered as a Vendor on the City's Vendor List. Vendor registration can be accomplished by visiting the City website at www.cityofrc.us. Only those responses received from registered Vendors will be accepted. Responses must be submitted by the named Vendor that has downloaded the RFP, this information is indicated in the bid system and provides the ability to tabulate the responses in accordance to the named Vendors. Submitting a response under a Vendor name that does not appear to be on the Prospective Bidders list will be deemed as non-responsive and disqualify said response from further consideration. 1.2 Proposal Delivery and Schedule of Events RFP responses must be received Electronically in the Planet Bid System no later than the due date and time specified in the below Schedule of Events. Please note, there will be no paper responses accepted. The City shall not be responsible for any delays or transmission errors. "Exhibit B, Vendor References" shall be submitted with the RFP response but "ONLY" as a separate attachment under its own Title Page, "Exhibit B, Vendor References. Please Note, references are not to be discussed in any other section of Vendor's RFP response other than "Exhibit B, Vendor References". Failure to comply with this instruction will deem said RFP response as non-responsive and will not be considered any further during evaluation process. Schedule of Events Post RFP Questions Due Addendum Issued RFP Response Due Date Vendor Interviews / Presentation Letter of Intent to Award March 13, 2018 March 27, 2018 at 12:00 pm April 02, 2018 April 12, 2018 at 9:00 am TBD Only if the City deems necessary) TBD (The City reserves the right to change schedule of events without prior notice or responsibility to Vendor.) Submittals Due: April 12, 2018, by 9:00 AM Page 2 of 41 Page 97 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Proposals ("RFP") # 17/18-009 for Security Guard Services at Various City Facilities 1.3 Discrepancies or Omissions Vendors finding discrepancies or omissions in the RFP or having any doubts as to the meaning or intent of any part thereof shall submit such questions or concerns in writing to the applicable Purchasing contact identified herein. All questions must be submitted electronically through the bid system and no responsibility will be accepted for oral instructions. Addenda issued in correspondence to this RFP shall be considered a part of this RFP and shall become part of any final Contract that may be derived from this RFP. 1.4 Contingencies This RFP should not be considered as a Contract to purchase goods or services, but is a Request for Proposal in accordance with the Terms and Conditions herein and will not necessarily give rise to a Contract. However, RFP responses should be as detailed and complete as possible to facilitate the formation of a Contract based on the RFP response(s) that are pursued should the City decide to do so. Completion of this RFP form and its associated appendices are a requirement. Failure to do so may disqualify your RFP response submittal. Vendors must submit signed, RFP responses by the due date and time as specified herein. Vendors will be considered non-responsive if the above requirements are not submitted as requested. If only one RFP response is received, the City reserves the right to reject the RFP and go back out to bid. Any Scope of Services, Contingencies, Special Instruction and/or Terms and Conditions applicable to this RFP and any Purchase Order derived thereafter shall be effective as of the issue date of Purchase Order (the "Effective Date"), and shall remain in full force and effect until sixty (60) days after the City has accepted the work in writing and has made final payment, unless sooner terminated by written agreement signed by both parties. 1.5 Questions and Clarifications All questions or clarification requests must be submitted directly through the City's bid system on or before March 27, 2018 by 12:00 PM. Answers and/or clarifications will be provided in the form of an Addendum and will be posted for download from the City's bid system in accordance with the above "Schedule of Events". From the issuance date of this RFP until a Vendor is awarded, Vendors are not permitted to communicate with any City staff or officials regarding this procurement, other than during interviews, demonstrations, and/or site visits, except at the direction of Ruth Cain, CPPB, Procurement Manager, the designated representative of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Submittals Due: April 12, 2018, by 9:00 AM Page 3 of 41 Page 98 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Proposals ("RFP") # 17/18-009 for Security Guard Services at Various City Facilities 1.6 Disposition of Material and Confidential or Proprietary Information All materials submitted in response to the RFP solicitation will become the property of the City and will be returned only at the City's option and at the expense of the Vendor submitting the RFP response. A copy of the RFP response will be retained for official files and become a public record. Any material that a Vendor considers as confidential but does not meet the disclosure exemption requirements of the California Public Records Act should not be included in the Vendor's RFP response as it may be made available to the public. If a Vendor's RFP response contains material noted or marked as confidential and/or proprietary that, in the City's sole opinion, meets the disclosure exemption requirements, then that information will not be disclosed pursuant to a written request for public documents. If the City does not consider such material to be exempt from disclosure, the material may be made available to the public, regardless of the notation or markings. If a Vendor is unsure if its confidential and/or proprietary material meets disclosure exemption requirements, then it should not include such information in its RFP response because such information may be disclosed to the public. 1.7 Knowledge of Requirements The Vendor shall carefully review all documents referenced and made a part of the solicitation document to ensure that all information required to properly respond has been submitted or made available and all requirements are priced in the RFP response. Failure to examine any documents, drawings, specifications, or instructions will be at the Vendor's sole risk. Vendors shall be responsible for knowledge of all items and conditions contained in their RFP responses and in this RFP, including any City issued clarifications, modifications, amendments, or addenda. The City will provide notice of any changes and clarifications to perspective Vendors by way of addenda to the City's website; however, it is the Vendor's responsibility to ascertain that the RFP response includes all addenda issued prior to the RFP due date. 1.8 Reservation of Rights The issuance of this RFP does not constitute an agreement by the City that any contract will be entered by the City. The City expressly reserves the right at any time to: • Waive or correct any defect or informality in any response, RFP, or RFP procedure. • Reject any or all RFPs. • Reissue a Request for RFPs. • Prior to submission deadline for RFPs, modify all or any portion of the selection procedures, including deadlines for accepting responses, the specifications or requirements for any materials, Submittals Due: April 12, 2018, by 9:00 AM Page 4 of 41 Page 99 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Proposals ("RFP") # 17/18-009 for Security Guard Services at Various City Facilities equipment or services to be provided under this RFP, or the requirements for contents or format of the RFPs. • The City recognizes that price is only one of several criteria to be used in judging a product or service, and the City is not legally bound to accept the lowest RFP response. • The City reserves the right to conduct pre -award discussions and/or pre -Contract negotiations with any or all responsive and responsible Vendors who submit RFP responses. • Procure any materials, equipment or services specified in this RFP by any other means. • Determine that no project will be pursued. • The City reserves the right to inspect the Vendor's place of business prior to award or at any time during the contract term or any extension thereof, to determine the Vendor's capabilities and qualifications. 1.9 California's Public Records Act The City of Rancho Cucamonga complies with the California Public Records Act, Government Code Section 6253. (a) Public records are open to inspection always during the office hours of the state or local agency and every person has a right to inspect any public record, except as hereafter provided. Any reasonably segregable portion of a record shall be available for inspection by any person requesting the record after deletion of the portions that are exempted by law. Neither an RFP in its entirety, nor proposed prices shall be considered confidential and proprietary. Notwithstanding the foregoing, companies are hereby notified that all materials submitted in response to this RFP are subject to California's Public Records Act. The City's receipt, review, evaluation or any other act or omission concerning any such information shall not create an acceptance by the City or any obligation or duty to prevent the disclosure of any such information except as required by Government Code Section 6253. Companies who submit information they believe should be exempt from disclosure under the Public Records Act shall clearly mark each document as confidential, proprietary or exempt, and state the legal basis for the exemption with supporting citations to the California Code. Pursuant to California Law, if the information is requested under the Public Records Act, the City shall make a final determination if any exemption exists for the City to deny the request and prevent disclosure. The City will withhold such information from public disclosure under the Public Records Act only if the City determines, in its sole discretion, that there is a legal basis to do so. Submittals Due: April 12, 2018, by 9:00 AM Page 5 of 41 Page 100 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Proposals ("RFP") # 17/18-009 for Security Guard Services at Various City Facilities 2. MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS 2.1 Business License The selected Vendor awarded a Contract shall be required to obtain a Rancho Cucamonga Business License no later than five (5) business days from notification of award prior to being issued a Purchase Order. Awarded Vendor must possess and maintain all appropriate licenses/certifications necessary in the performance of duties required under this RFP and will provide copies of licenses/certifications immediately upon request throughout the term of the Contract. 2.2 PREVAILING WAGES Where labor is required for public work as a part of any requirement covered by this RFP, pursuant to the provisions of the Labor Code of the State of California, Vendors) shall pay no less than those minimum wages. Proof of prevailing wage will be required prior to the issuance of a Contract. 2.3 REPRESENTATIVES Should the awarded Vendor require the services of a third -party to complete the Scope of Services indicated in this RFP, the awarded Vendor will not assign, transfer, convey or otherwise dispose of the contract or its right, title or interest in or to the same, or any part thereof. Any attempt by the awarded Vendor to so assign, transfer, or subcontract any rights, duties, or obligations arising hereunder shall be null, void and of no effect. The awarded Vendor shall be solely responsible for the satisfactory work performance of all personnel engaged in performing the Services including Vendors subcontractor. All Services shall be performed by the awarded Vendor or under the awarded Vendor's direct supervision, and all personnel shall possess the qualifications, permits, and licenses required by state and local law to perform such services. The awarded Vendor shall be responsible for payment of all employees' and subcontractor's wages and benefits, and shall comply with all requirements pertaining to employer's liability, workers' compensation, unemployment insurance, and Social Security. By its execution of this Agreement, Vendor certifies that it is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code that require every employer to be insured against liability for Worker's Compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and agrees to comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the services. In case of default by the Vendor, the City may take the following actions which shall include but not be limited to; cancellation of any purchase order, procurement of the articles or service from other sources Submittals Due: April 12, 2018, by 9:00 AM Page 6 of 41 Page 101 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Proposals ("RFP") # 17/18-009 for Security Guard Services at Various City Facilities and may deduct from unpaid balance due to the Vendor, or may bill for excess costs so paid, and the prices paid by the City shall be considered the prevailing market prices paid at the time such purchase is made, withholding of payment until final resolution. Cost of transportation, handling, and/or inspection on deliveries, or Vendors for delivery, which do not meet specifications, will be for the account of the Vendor. City Representative: For the purposes of this Agreement, the contract administrator and City's representative shall be Thr Quaintance, or such other person as designated in writing by City ("City's Representative"). It shall be the Vendor's responsibility to assure that City's Representative is kept informed of the progress of the performance of the services, and the Vendor shall refer any decisions that must be made by City to City Representative. Unless otherwise specified herein, any approval of City required hereunder shall mean the approval of the City Representative. Vendor Representative: For the purposes of this Agreement, is hereby designated as the representative of the successful Vendor authorized to act in its behalf with respect to the services specified herein and make all decisions in connection therewith ("Vendor's Representative"). It is expressly understood that the experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of the Vendor's Representative were a substantial inducement for City to enter into this Agreement. Therefore, the Vendor's Representative shall be responsible during the term of this Agreement for directing all activities of Vendor and devoting sufficient time to personally supervise the services hereunder. The successful Vendor may not change the Vendor's Representative without the prior written approval of City's Representative. 2.4 EMPLOYEE CONDUCT All Vendor personnel must observe all City regulations in effect at the location where the Services are being conducted. While on City property, the Vendor's personnel shall be subject to oversight by City staff. Under no circumstances shall the Vendor's or Vendor's sub -contractor personnel be deemed as employees of the City. Vendor or Vendor's subcontractor personnel shall not represent themselves to be employees of the City. Vendor's personnel will always make their best efforts to be responsive, polite, and cooperative when interacting with representatives of the City, or any other City employees. The Vendor's personnel shall be required to work in a pleasant and professional manner with City employees, outside Vendors and the public. Nothing contained in this RFP shall be construed as granting the Vendor the sole right to supply personal or contractual services required by the City or without the proper City approval and the issuance of a Purchase Order. Submittals Due: April 12, 2018, by 9:00 AM Page 7 of 41 Page 102 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Proposals ("RFP") # 17/18-009 for Security Guard Services at Various City Facilities 3. RFP RESPONSE FORMAT AND SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS To be considered responsive, and evaluate RFP responses fairly and completely Vendors must comply with the format and submission requirements set out in this RFP, and provide all information requested. Failure to comply with this instruction will deem said RFP response as non-responsive and will not receive further consideration in the evaluation process. RFP submittals are due on the due date and time indicated in the above schedule of events. All proposal submittals are to be submitted electronically via Planet Bids; no paper RFPs will be accepted. Vendor RFP responses should be prepared simply and economically, providing a straightforward, concise description of capabilities to satisfy the requirements of the RFP. Emphasis should be on completeness and clarity of content. Vendors shall provide one (1) electronic RFP response through the bid system. To remain environmentally friendly and cost effective, please utilize double -sided print A Title Page separating each of the following sections is required. 3.1 COVER LETTER/ INTRODUCTION RFP responses must include the complete name and address of Vendor and the name, mailing address, and telephone number of the contact person regarding the RFP response. A signature by an authorized representative must be included on each RFP response. Said signature will be considered confirmation of the Vendors ability and willingness to comply with all provisions stated herein. 3.2 TABLE OF CONTENTS The Table of Contents must be a comprehensive listing of the contents included in your RFP response. This section must include a clear definition of the material, exhibits and supplemental information identified by sequential page numbers and by section reference numbers. 3.3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Executive Summary shall condense and highlight the contents of the Vendor's RFP response to provide the Evaluation Committee with a broad understanding of the Vendor's approach, Proposal, experience and staffing. 3.4 EXPERIENCE The Vendor shall provide a concise statement demonstrating the Vendor's Proposal, experience, expertise and capability to perform the requirements of this RFP. Provide a brief history of your company, including; • The number of years in business, Submittals Due: April 12, 2018, by 9:00 AM Page 8 of 41 Page 103 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Proposals ("RFP") # 17/18-009 for Security Guard Services at Various City Facilities • Days and hours of operation, • The firms service commitment to customers, • If the firm is involved in any pending litigation that may affect its ability to provide its proposed solution or ongoing maintenance or support of its products and services. • State whether your firm is an individual proprietorship, partnership, corporation, or private nonprofit firm, and the date your company was formed or incorporated. 3.5 THIRD -PARTY/ SUBCONTRACTORS If the Vendor intends to subcontract, a detailed list of any sub -contractors, partners, or third -party Vendors who will be involved in the implementation of the proposed services including but not limited to; • Description of the Vendor's experience with each of the proposed subcontractors, • Three (3) customer references for each subcontractor to include references names, addresses, and telephone numbers, for products and services like those described in this RFP, • Describe the specific role of each. 3.6 STAFF BIOGRAPHIES Submit the resumes of the individuals who will be performing the services for the City. Resumes shall be formatted in the following order: • Position with the Company, • Length of time with the Company, • Licenses, registrations and certifications as required by law to perform the Scope of Work described herein, • Educational background, • Role in the Project, • Experience with the minimum requirements stated herein, • Work history on similar or like projects with the other municipalities. 3.7 NON -DISCLOSURE CONFLICT OF INTEREST Specify any possible conflicts of interest with your current clients or staff members and the City. A signed "Conflict of Interest and Non -Disclosure Agreement, Exhibit A" included herein must be submitted under this section. Submittals Due: April 12, 2018, by 9:00 AM Page 9 of 41 Page 104 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Proposals ("RFP") # 17/18-009 for Security Guard Services at Various City Facilities 3.8 COMPANY REFERENCES Provide a minimum of four (4) references, preferably with other municipalities in which similar services are being performed. References must be for work performed or completed in the past three (3) years. "Reference Worksheet, Exhibit B" is to be submitted as a separate attachment. References are not to be discussed in any other area of the RFP submittal. Failure to comply with this instruction will deem the RFP response as non-responsive and will not be considered any further in the evaluation process. 3.9 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE AGREEMENT In addition to the acceptance of the City's Terms and Conditions, the successful Vendor will be required to enter into a Professional Services Agreement ("PSA") with the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a "Sample" of which is attached in the City's bid system for review. All requirements of said PSA must be completed by the successful Vendor and signed by both applicable parties prior to any services being rendered. This RFP sets forth some of the general provisions which may be included in the final PSA. In submitting a response to this RFP, Vendor will be deemed to have agreed to each clause unless otherwise indicated in the "Exception Summary, Exhibit C" and the City agrees to either, accept the objection or deviation, or change the PSA language in writing. Failure to raise any objections at the time of this RFP response submittal will result in a waiver of objection to any of the contractual language in the PSA at any other time. The signed Exception Summary shall be included under this section of the RFP response. 3.10 INSURANCE Proposers must meet all insurance requirements as outlined in the Professional Services Agreement. Ability to comply with said requirements must be indicated with signature of the "Acknowledgement of Insurance Requirements and Certification of Ability to Provide Coverages Specified, Exhibit D", which must be submitted with the Bid. The awarded Vendor will be responsible for providing the required Certificates of Insurance and must be the Named Insured on the Certificates. Certificates of Insurance from any other entity other than the awarded Vendor, will not be accepted. 3.11 ADDENDUM ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The Vendor shall hereby acknowledge they have received all posted Addendums, if any. The Vendor understands failure to acknowledge any addenda issued may cause the response to be considered non- responsive. It is the Vendor's responsibility to log into the Bid System to identify and download the number of addenda that have been posted. Addenda issued in correspondence to this RFP shall be considered a part of this RFP and shall become part of any final Contract that may be derived from this RFP Vendors must indicate their acknowledgement of any Addendums by way of signature on the "Addendum Acknowledgement Form, Exhibit E" and must be included under this section of the RFP response. Submittals Due: April 12, 2018, by 9:00 AM Page 10 of 41 Page 105 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Proposals ("RFP") # 17/18-009 for Security Guard Services at Various City Facilities 3.12. VENDOR CERTIFICATION Vendors must verify by way of signature to "Exhibit F, Vendor Certification Form" that Vendor nor any of its proposed subcontractors are currently under suspension or debarment by any state or federal government agency, and that neither Vendor not any of its proposed subcontractors are tax delinquent with the State of California. The signed exhibit must be included under this section of the RFP response. 3.13 SIGNATURE OF AUTHORITY Completion of this RFP form and its associated Exhibits are a requirement. Failure to do so may disqualify your RFP response submittal. Vendors must submit one (1) electronic RFP responses by the due date and time as specified herein. Vendors will be considered non-responsive if the above requirement are not submitted as requested. If only one RFP response is received, the City reserves the right to return the RFP to the Vendor. "Exhibit G", Signature of Authority must be included with the Vendor RFP response. 3.14 LINE ITEM PRICING In combination with the RFP response, Vendors shall also submit line item pricing in Planet Bids. Line item pricing shall be provided in accordance to the items listed on the "Line Items" tab in Planet Bids. This pricing is not an estimate and is the firm price for each item listed. Vendors quotes outside of the pricing listed in Planet Bids will not be accepted. Any additional cost required should be noted in the Additional Cost line item and a summary of the cost provided in the notes section of the line item. Cost shall not be discussed in any other area of the RFP response other than the "Line Item" tab in Planet Bids. The City will not be obligated to any cost not identified in the Cost Proposal submission. Failure to provide the required Cost Proposal in the requested format and on the City's Form will cause Vendors submittal to be non-responsive and be eliminated from any further consideration. Any questions regarding how to correctly submit vendor pricing should be submitted by the due date and time indicated in the schedule of events. 3.15 PARTICIPATION CLAUSE It is hereby understood that other governmental entities, such as cities, counties, and special/school districts may utilize this RFP response at their option for equipment or services at the RFP response price. Said entities shall have the option to participate in any award made because of this solicitation. Any such piggy -back awards will be made independently by each agency, and the City is not an agent, partner or representative of these agencies and is not obligated or liable for any action of debts that may arise out of such independently negotiated piggy -back procurement. Each public agency shall accept sole responsibility of its own order placement and payments to the Vendor. A signed "Participation Clause, Section 5.8 herein" must be included under this section of the RFP response. Submittals Due: April 12, 2018, by 9:00 AM Page 11 of 41 Page 106 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Proposals ("RFP") # 17/18-009 for Security Guard Services at Various City Facilities 4. SCOPE OF SERVICES The Vendor shall provide professional Security Officers, equipment, tools, materials, supervision and other items necessary to perform security patrol services as indicated throughout this RFP. The successful Vendor must be able to perform to the minimum standards stated herein. The City expressly reserves the right and is at the City's sole discretion to request the removal and replacement of any security guards who, in the City's opinion is for any reason unsatisfactory. 4.1 DEFINITIONS a. City Representative -As used herein is the City employee designated to oversee the contract that may result from this solicitation. b. Daily Activity Report: "Daily activity report" as used herein includes the daily log, a printout of the scan log from the tour verification system and a printout of the GPS track recording the guard's location throughout the shift. c. Daily Log: "Daily Log" as used herein is a detailed written log prepared by the individual guards documenting all activities during their individual working hours. d. Shift: "Shift" as used herein is the period services are to be provided at a given facility during a 24- hour period. Example: M-TH, 7am-7pm is fourtwelve-hour shifts per week with each shift beginning at 7:00 am and ending at 7:00 pm. regardless of how the vendor covers the shift. When referring to park lockups the shift is the period during a 24-hour period when lockup services are to be completed at all scheduled locations. 4.2 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS To include but not be limited to the following; a. Vendor shall possess a current private operator's number/Private Patrol Permit number from the State of California Department of Consumer affairs, bureau of Security and Investigative Services. The contract will be automatically nullified should the license become expired, suspended or revoked. b. Vendor shall have at least five (5) years continuous professional experience in providing and managing security services in similar settings. Experience providing services to local governments preferred. c. Vendor shall have no record of unsatisfactory performance. Vendors who are or have been deficient in current or recent contract performance, in the absence of circumstances properly beyond the control of the Vendor, shall be presumed to be unable to meet this requirement. d. Security Guards provided by the successful Vendor shall be registered with the California Department of Consumer Affairs and shall possess a current, valid Guard Registration Card while on d uty. e. Security Guards shall be trained and certified and have at least three (3) years continuous Submittals Due: April 12, 2018, by 9:00 AM Page 12 of 41 Page 107 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Proposals ("RFP") # 17/18-009 for Security Guard Services at Various City Facilities professional experience. f. The successful Vendor shall be required to enter a PSA with the City and comply with all Insurance requirements stated therein. g. Each security guard provided by the Vendor shall have the ability to read and write the English language; understand and carry out oral and written directions; think and act quickly and effectively in emergencies; and write accurate and clear reports. h. Vendor shall ensure that Security Officers are neat in appearance and wear a uniform with name tag of the type normally worn in commercial security services. i. If a contract is awarded pursuant to this RFP, the Vendor shall furnish, install and maintain electronic patrol tour verification devices at all locations for which services are provided under said contract. j. The tour verification system shall; 1. Use RFID tags, bar codes, QR codes or other approved devices at locations to be provided by the City after award of contract. 2. Log the hours of patrol through individual scans as guards pass the point. 3. Use GPS to validate the position of the devices when scanned. 4. Provide a continuous, real time, GPS track of all guards' movements and locations during service hours. 5. Provide a separate continuous, real time, GPS track of all vendor owned vehicles' movements and locations during service hours. The vehicle log shall include vehicle speed at any given point in time. 6. Provide the City with real time web based access to the tour verification system, including but not limited to patrol log, maps with patrol routes and timelines, incident reports, and any other information related to services performed for the City. 7. Be in place and fully operational within thirty days of the notice to proceed. 8. Notify the City if the system goes off-line for any reason during the term of the contract. If the system is off-line the daily log portion of the daily activity reports required in section 4.21 below shall be submitted to the City Representative within 24 hours of the end of each shift at the affected locations. Failure to provide daily activity reports during system outages within 24 hours of the end of each shift will result in deductions pursuant to Section 4.5a. 9. Have the capability to be back online with 72 hours of an outage. Failure to have the tour verification system online within 72 hours will result in deductions pursuant to Section 1.5b. k. Uniforms shall be furnished by the Vendor as well as flashlights, batteries, cell phones, radios, security vehicles, reporting forms, electronic patrol tour verification devices and other supplies needed to perform duties as described herein. Submittals Due: April 12, 2018, by 9:00 AM Page 13 of 41 Page 108 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Proposals ("RFP") # 17/18-009 for Security Guard Services at Various City Facilities I. Vendor shall prepare daily activity reports for each building/shift for which services are provided under this contract. The daily activity report shall include the daily log prepared by the guard on duty, a printout of the scan log from the tour verification system and a printout of the GPS track recording the guard's location throughout the shift. Daily activity reports shall be submitted to the City Representative on a weekly basis by 12:00 noon on Tuesday of the following week except as required by section 4.2h (8) In addition, all daily activity reports for a billing period shall be submitted with each invoice. m. Vendor shall notify the City Representative by telephone of any accidents or incidents occurring on City property. Said notification shall be made as soon as the situation has stabilized and it is safe for the guard to do so. In addition, an incident report shall be prepared for all significant incidents occurring during each shift. If there were no significant incidents during a shift an incident report shall be prepared stating that no significant incidents occurred during the shift. Incident reports shall be submitted to the City Representative on a weekly basis by 12:00 noon on Tuesday of the following week unless requested sooner by the City representative. In addition, all incident reports for a billing period shall be submitted with each invoice. n. Vendor will maintain daily, weekly and monthly statistics for incident reports, electronic patrol tour reports and provide written reports to the Facilities Superintendent attached to the monthly invoices or upon request. o. Vendor will exercise professional judgment and caution in responding to or discovering unsafe conditions, emergency situations and criminal activity. The Vendor will be solely responsible to provide training of all Security Officers in the appropriate response to unsafe conditions, emergency situations and criminal activity. p. Vendor may be required to provide Security Officers upon special request of the City to arrive within a one-hour period. This may include crowd control, site/perimeter security, secure transportation of performers, and personal protection for performers and/or VIP talent security in relation to performances at City venues. q. Upon award of a contract the successful Vendor shall identify a contact that will be assigned and responsible for management of the contract and coordination of services directly with the City's contact identified within the PSA. All changes in schedules, requests for service, additional services, etc. shall be mutually agreed upon by way of Addendum signed by both parties, prior to any changes in service being made. r. Additional service charges shall be in accordance to those rates quoted herein. Any changes in scope, schedules, additional services, etc. shall be denied payment unless documented in writing by way of Addendum and signed by both parties. Submittals Due: April 12, 2018, by 9:00 AM Page 14 of 41 Page 109 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Proposals ("RFP") # 17/18-009 for Security Guard Services at Various City Facilities s. Post orders shall be established for all locations regularly serviced. Vendor is required to submit and review post orders with named City contact or designee prior to execution of said agreement. The City reserves the right to adjust post orders as situations require assuring the best protection of the City, its property and the public. 4.3 SECURITY OFFICER SPECIFICATIONS To include but not be limited to the following; a. Guard the property against fire, theft, damage, vandalism and graffiti. b. Report and document, in accordance with procedures, any unusual activity, hazardous conditions, damage or situations that may develop into potential facility damage and /or suspicious activity. c. Maintain daily log for each shift, incident reports and activity reports as required. d. Appropriately respond to potential and actual emergencies such as fire, medical, situations orthreats to the public, City staff or property. e. Check that all exterior doors are locked after business hours. f. Carry a radio or phone for immediate contact with Vendors Command Center and the City of Rancho Cucamonga Police Station. g. Carry all devices necessary to implement the requirements for the tour verifications system described herein. h. Carry emergency telephone numbers for Vendors command center and City staff always and maintain confidentiality of contact list. i. Understand and can implement facility patrol procedures as well as Vendor's patrol procedures. j. Politely interact with the public and always maintain a professional demeanor. 4.4 PAYMENT a. The Vendor shall prepare separate routine maintenance monthly invoices for each facility covered under this contract. b. Invoices shall be submitted to City within thirty (30) days following the end of the month of the reporting period. The daily, weekly and monthly statistical reports, daily activity reports, incident reports, and other written reports, required by sections 4.2 I, m, and n above, shall be attached to the monthly invoices. Invoices which do not include these reports will be refected. c. Invoices and summary reports for reporting period ending on June 30th shall be submitted to City by August 1st. Any further invoices after this date for the previous fiscal year (July 1st to June 30th of subsequent calendar year) will be denied. Submittals Due: April 12, 2018, by 9:00 AM Page 15 of 41 Page 110 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Proposals ("RFP") # 17/18-009 for Security Guard Services at Various City Facilities 4.5 DEDUCTIONS a. Deductions for standing guard services and patrol routes: Following the grace period defined in section 4.2h (7); payment will be made only for services documented by the tour verification system. If the tour verification system does not show that a guard is on post, whether standing or a patrol route, then it will be assumed that the guard absent from the post. Payment deductions will be made on a pro rata basis for all time that a guard is absent from the post. b. Deductions for tour verification system outages: The electronic tour verification is an essential service to be provided by the vendor. Pursuant to section 4.2h (8), the vendor shall submit daily activity logs within 24 hours of the end of each shift during system outages. All work documented by daily activity logs submitted within 24 hours of the end of each shift will be subject to a 25% payment deduction. This deduction will be waived for properly documented work performed during the first 72 hours following the beginning of the outage. Failure to submit the daily activity logs within 24 hours of the end of the shift will result in the deductions described in section 4.5a. c. Deductions for park lock-up services: Following the grace period defined in section 4.2h (7); if the tour verification system does not show that a lockup location was visited, payment will not be made for said location. In addition, if a location was visited and the location was not locked, payment will not be made for said location unless an exception report was provided to the Parks Supervisor the next business day following the exception. The amount of deduction per location missed shall be calculated by dividing the daily rate for park restroom lockup by the number of locations listed in Table 1. If lockup locations are added or deleted from the list in table one, the deduction amount shall be calculated by dividing the new daily rate by the new number of locations. 4.6 SERVICE LOCATIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS The City reserves the right to change service schedules at its own discretion. The City will make every reasonable effort to provide Vendor with a fourteen (14) day notice prior to any schedule change. All changes in service will be calculated based on the unit rates quoted herein. A. Civic Center - 10500 Civic Center M-TH, 7.30am-3:30pm (32 hrs./wks. Excluding City holidays and Holiday closures) Provide Security Guard services for patrol routes and parking lot monitoring/control for four (4) parking lots. This location will also require interaction with the public and city staff, monitoring of vehicles and reporting parking violations, hazards, directional assistance, and walkout/drive out service for staff. The City will provide a golf cart for use at this location. The Vendor is to furnish, install and maintain electronic patrol tour verification devices at this location. A map of device placement will be provided after award of contract. Submittals Due: April 12, 2018, by 9:00 AM Page 16 of 41 Page 111 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Proposals ("RFP") # 17/18-009 for Security Guard Services at Various City Facilities B. Central Park - 11200 Baseline Rd. M -Su. 6pm-lam (49 hrs./wks. Excluding City holidays and Holiday closures) Provide Security Guard services for site and parking lot monitoring, directional assistance, perimeter patrol routes, walkout services for staff, interaction with public/staff/customers, loss control and special event security. The Vendor is to furnish, install and maintain electronic patrol tour verification devices at this location. A map of device placement will be provided after award of contract. C. Epicenter/Sports Complex - 8408 Rochester Ave. M -F 8pm-3am, Sat. 12pm to 6pm, 7pm-3am, Sun. 7pm-3am (57 hrs./wks.) Provide standing Security Guard services for forty (40) acre site that incorporates a Minor League Baseball Stadium, six (6) sports fields, and seven (7) parking lots. Services include patrol routes, special events security, walkout service for staff, weekend crowd control, parking lot monitoring, and loss control. The Vendor is to furnish, install and maintain electronic patrol tour verification devices at this location. A map of device placement will be provided after award of contract. D. Archibald Library - 7368 Archibald Ave. M-TH 3pm-8:15pm, Fri. 2pm-6:15pm, Sat. -Sun. fpm-5:15pm (33.75 hrs./wks. Excluding recognized City holidays and Holiday closures) Provide interior and exterior foot patrols for Archibald Branch Library and parking lot. Service shall include interaction with public, loss control and walkout service for staff. The Vendor is to furnish, install and maintain electronic patrol tour verification devices at this location. A map of device placement will be provided after award of contract. E. Metrolink Station - 11208 Azusa Court at Milliken M -F 4am-11:00pm, Sat 6:00am-1:00am, Sun 6:00am-10:30pm (110.5 hrs./wks.) Provide standing Security Guard services for Metrolink train station and adjoining parking lots. Services include platform security, patrol routes and parking lot surveillance. The Vendor is to furnish, install and maintain electronic patrol tour verification devices at this location. A map of device placement will be provided after award of contract. F. Animal Care and Adoption Center - 11780 Arrow Route M -Sun. 7pm-8pm (7 hrs./wks.) Provide standing Security Guard services for the Animal Care and Adoption Center. This location requires interaction with the public and city staff, and walkout service for staff. The Vendor is to furnish, install and maintain electronic patrol tour verification devices at this location. A map of device placement will be provided after award of contract. Submittals Due: April 12, 2018, by 9:00 AM Page 17 of 41 Page 112 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Proposals ("RFP") # 17/18-009 for Security Guard Services at Various City Facilities G. Additive/Alternate Bid Item 1: Park Restroom Night Lock -Up and Gate Closure - Various Locations (Does not include gate at Etiwanda Preserve) Provide park restroom night lock-up and gate closure at the parks listed in Table 1. The Vendor is to furnish, install and maintain electronic patrol tour verification devices at these locations. If there is significant group activity in the park, the restrooms/gates are to be left open and the activity noted in the log. No return trip to the park is required. All restrooms and gates are to be closed during the time intervals indicated in Table 1. Park Restroom Night Lock -Up and Gate Closure is not required on the following holidays: New Year's Eve, July 4t", Halloween, Thanksgiving Eve, Thanksgiving, Christmas Eve, and Christmas Day. All other holidays will be paid at regular daily rates. Daily reports from the tour verification system documenting the date/time of restroom/gate lockup and any exceptions are to be provided to the Parks Supervisor daily. Table 1 Location Name Address Notes Foothill Trailhead 8500 Foothill Blvd Restroom lockup only at 10:00 pm every day. Do not lock gates Los Amigos Park 8625 Madrone Avenue Close restrooms between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. seven (7) days per week. Golden Oak 9345 Golden Oak Rd Close restrooms between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. seven (7) days per week. Old Town 10033 Feron Blvd Close restrooms between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. seven (7) days per week. Church 10190 Church St Close restrooms between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. seven (7) days per week. Close restrooms between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. Hermosa 6787 Hermosa Ave seven (7) days per week. Ralph M. Lewis 7898 Elm St Close restrooms between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. seven (7) days per week. Close restrooms between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. Spruce 7730 Spruce Ave seven (7) days per week. West Greenway 7756 Meadowcrest Ct Close restrooms between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. seven (7) days per week. Coyote Canyon 10987 Terra Vista Pkwy Close restrooms between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. seven (7) days per week. Submittals Due: April 12, 2018, by 9:00 AM Page 18 of 41 Page 113 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Proposals ("RFP") # 17/18-009 for Security Guard Services at Various City Facilities Milliken 7699 Milliken Ave Close restrooms between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. seven (7) days per week. Mountain View 11701 Terra Vista Pkwy Close restrooms between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. seven (7) days per week. Garcia 13150 Garcia Drive Close restrooms between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. seven (7) days per week. Close restrooms and gate between 10:00 p.m. and Victoria Arbors 7429 Arbor Lane 2:00 a.m. seven (7) days per week. Do not lock gates if vehicles are in parking lot Ellena 7139 Kenyon Way Close restrooms between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. seven (7) days per week. Close restrooms between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. Kenyon 11481 Kenyon Way seven (7) days per week. Victoria Groves 6840 Fairmont Close restrooms between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. seven (7) days per week. Vintage 11745 Victoria Park Ln Close restrooms between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. seven (7) days per week. Windrows 6849 Victoria Park Ln Close restrooms between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. seven (7) days per week. Day Creek 12350 Banyan St Close restrooms between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. seven (7) days per week. Close restrooms and gates, including east and west Etiwanda Creek 5939 East Ave dog park gates, between 11:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. seven (7) days per week. Drive down access road to insure no vehicles are present before locking gate. Olive Grove 13931 Youngs Canyon Close restrooms between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. Rd seven (7) days per week. Legacy 5858 Santa Ynez PI Close restrooms between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. seven (7) days per week. Rancho Summit 5958 Soledad Way Close restrooms between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. seven (7) days per week. East Beryl 6524 Beryl St Close restrooms between 11:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. seven (7) days per week. Close restrooms, park gate and equestrian center Heritage 5546 Beryl St gate between 11:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. seven (7) days per week. Do not lock gates if vehicles are in parking lot Submittals Due: April 12, 2018, by 9:00 AM Page 19 of 41 Page 114 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Proposals ("RFP") # 17/18-009 for Security Guard Services at Various City Facilities West Beryl 6501 Carnelian St Close restrooms between 11:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. seven (7) days per week. Red Hill 7484 Vineyard Ave Close restrooms between 11:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. seven (7) days per week. Bear Gulch 9094 Arrow Hwy Close restrooms between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. Los Amigos Park 8625 Madrone Avenue seven (7) days per week. Notes: When emergency situations occur, contact the appropriate responder below for assistance: 1. 911 9345 Golden Oak Rd 2. Tim Faulkner, Parks Maintenance Supervisor - 951.240.6791 3. On Call/Standby 909 773-2613 H. Additive/Alternate Bid Item 2: Park Restroom Night Lock -Up and Gate Closure - Various Locations INCLUDES GATE AT ETIWANDA PRESERVE) Provide park restroom night lock-up and gate closure at the parks listed in Table 2. The Vendor is to furnish, install and maintain electronic patrol tour verification devices at these locations. If there is significant group activity in the park, the restrooms/gates are to be left open and the activity noted in the log. No return trip to the park is required. All restrooms and gates are to be closed during the time intervals indicated in Table 2. Park Restroom Night Lock -Up and Gate Closure is not required on the following holidays: New Year's Eve, July 4t", Halloween, Thanksgiving Eve, Thanksgiving, Christmas Eve, and Christmas Day. All other holidays will be paid at regular daily rates. Daily reports from the tour verification system documenting the date/time of restroom/gate lockup and any exceptions are to be provided to the Parks Supervisor daily. Table 2 Park Name Address Notes Restroom lockup only at 10:00 pm every day. Do not lock Foothill Trailhead 8500 Foothill Blvd gates Close restrooms between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. seven Los Amigos Park 8625 Madrone Avenue (7) days per week. Close restrooms between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. seven Golden Oak 9345 Golden Oak Rd (7) days per week. Close restrooms between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. seven Old Town 10033 Feron Blvd (7) days per week. Submittals Due: April 12, 2018, by 9:00 AM Page 20 of 41 Page 115 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Proposals ("RFP") # 17/18-009 for Security Guard Services at Various City Facilities Church 10190 Church St Close restrooms between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. seven (7) days per week. Close restrooms between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. seven Hermosa 6787 Hermosa Ave (7) days per week. Ralph M. Lewis 7898 Elm St Close restrooms between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. seven (7) days per week. Close restrooms between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. seven Spruce 7730 Spruce Ave (7) days per week. West Greenway 7756 Meadowcrest Ct Close restrooms between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. seven (7) days per week. Coyote Canyon 10987 Terra Vista Pkwy Close restrooms between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. seven (7) days per week. Milliken 7699 Milliken Ave Close restrooms between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. seven (7) days per week. Mountain View 11701 Terra Vista Pkwy Close restrooms between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. seven (7) days per week. Garcia 13150 Garcia Drive Close restrooms between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. seven (7) days per week. Close restrooms and gate between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 Victoria Arbors 7429 Arbor Lane a.m. seven (7) days per week. Do not lock gates if vehicles are in parking lot Ellena 7139 Kenyon Way Close restrooms between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. seven (7) days per week. Close restrooms between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. seven Kenyon 11481 Kenyon Way (7) days per week. Victoria Groves 6840 Fairmont Close restrooms between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. seven (7) days per week. Vintage 11745 Victoria Park Ln Close restrooms between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. seven (7) days per week. Windrows 6849 Victoria Park Ln Close restrooms between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. seven (7) days per week. Day Creek 12350 Banyan St Close restrooms between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. seven (7) days per week. Close restrooms and gates, including east and west dog Etiwanda Creek 5939 East Ave park gates, between 11:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. seven (7) days per week. Drive down access road to insure no vehicles are present before locking gate. Olive Grove 13931 Youngs Canyon Close restrooms between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. seven Rd (7) days per week. Legacy 5858 Santa Ynez PI Close restrooms between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. seven (7) days per week. Rancho Summit 5958 Soledad Way Close restrooms between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. seven (7) days per week. East Beryl 6524 Beryl St Close restrooms between 11:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. seven (7) days per week. Submittals Due: April 12, 2018, by 9:00 AM Page 21 of 41 Page 116 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Proposals ("RFP") # 17/18-009 for Security Guard Services at Various City Facilities 4.7 HOLIDAY RATE The holiday rate shall be paid for scheduled services performed on City recognized holidays except as otherwise noted herein. 4.8 OVERTIME RATE The overtime rate shall be paid only when the City requests a scheduled service be extended on less than twenty-four (24) hour notice and said extension requires an individual guard's shift to exceed eight (8) hours. 4.9 HOLIDAYS Recognized City Holidays are as follows: 1. July 4 2. First Monday of September 3. November 11 4. Fourth Thursday of November 5. December 24 6. December 25 7. January 1 8. Third Monday of January 9. Third Monday of February 10. Last Monday of May Independence Day Labor Day Veterans Day Thanksgiving Day Day preceding Christmas Christmas Day New Year's Day Martin Luther King's Birthday President's Day Memorial Day Submittals Due: April 12, 2018, by 9:00 AM Page 22 of 41 Page 117 Close restrooms park gate and equestrian center gate Heritage 5546 Beryl St between 11:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. seven (7) days per week. Do not lock gates if vehicles are in parking lot West Beryl 6501 Carnelian St Close restrooms between 11:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. seven 7 days per week. Red Hill 7484 Vineyard Ave Close restrooms between 11:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. seven (7) days per week. Bear Gulch 9094 Arrow Hwy Close restrooms between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. seven 7 days per week. Lock gate between 9:00 p.m. and 11:00 p.m. seven days per week. Etiwanda Preserve 4890 Etiwanda Ave The gate is to remain unlocked and the San Bernardino County Sheriffs Department notified at (909) 941-1488 if vehicles are present. Notes: When emergency situations occur, contact the appropriate responder below for assistance: 1. 911 2. Tim Faulkner, Parks Maintenance Supervisor - 951.240.6791 3. On Call/Standby 909 773-2613 4.7 HOLIDAY RATE The holiday rate shall be paid for scheduled services performed on City recognized holidays except as otherwise noted herein. 4.8 OVERTIME RATE The overtime rate shall be paid only when the City requests a scheduled service be extended on less than twenty-four (24) hour notice and said extension requires an individual guard's shift to exceed eight (8) hours. 4.9 HOLIDAYS Recognized City Holidays are as follows: 1. July 4 2. First Monday of September 3. November 11 4. Fourth Thursday of November 5. December 24 6. December 25 7. January 1 8. Third Monday of January 9. Third Monday of February 10. Last Monday of May Independence Day Labor Day Veterans Day Thanksgiving Day Day preceding Christmas Christmas Day New Year's Day Martin Luther King's Birthday President's Day Memorial Day Submittals Due: April 12, 2018, by 9:00 AM Page 22 of 41 Page 117 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Proposals ("RFP") # 17/18-009 for Security Guard Services at Various City Facilities 4.10 HOLIDAY CLOSURE The schedule of services may be temporarily reduced or suspended when City facilities are closed pursuant to memorandums of understanding between the City and its employee groups. 4.11 TEMPORARY SERVICE SPECIFICATIONS The City Facilities Division operates and maintains over sixty (60) buildings at multiple locations throughout the City. The types of locations include but are not limited to; Civic Center, Libraries, Cultural Center, Community Centers, Public Works Yards, Police Stations, Train Depot, Construction Sites, Parks, and Paseos. Any of the above-mentioned location types may require security services at any given time. Typical duties for any of these locations would be patrol or standing Security Guard services, to protect against unauthorized entry, to provide public protection/guidance and to report on activities in these areas. The City is engaged in the presentation of theatrical events and concerts. There may be times that supplemental staffing for crowd control, site/perimeter security, and performer/VIP secure transportation, personal protection, related to performance venues in the City, will be required. The temporary services described above will be paid at the rates proposed for temporary services and would be contingent upon agreement by way of Addendum signed by both parties. Please provide hourly rates and annual pricing information for each location listed in the "Schedule of Services" and hourly rates for the "Temporary Services" as described herein. The annual contract price paid for Security Guard Services shall include full compensation for furnishing all administrative overhead, labor, materials, vehicles, tools, equipment, and incidentals and for doing all the work involved in providing Security Guard Services as described herein. All quoted pricing will become effective at the time of agreement and signature by both parties of a PSA. Pricing shall remain in effect through June 30, 2019. No incremental increase due to wage escalations or other events will be considered during the initial term of the contract. 4.12 ESTIMATED QUANTITIES The quantities given in the proposal and contract form are approximate, being given as a basis for the comparison of proposals only, and the City does not, expressly or by implication, agree that the actual amount of work will correspond therewith, but reserves the right to increase or decrease the amount of any class or portion of the work, or to omit any portion of the work, as may be deemed advisable or necessary by the City. Submittals Due: April 12, 2018, by 9:00 AM Page 23 of 41 Page 118 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Proposals ("RFP") # 17/18-009 for Security Guard Services at Various City Facilities 5. EVALUATION AND VENDOR SELECTION PROCESS 5.1 INITIAL SCREENING All RFP responses will undergo an initial review to determine responsiveness to the instructions herein. Those RFP responses initially determined to be responsive will proceed to the next phase of the evaluation process. 5.2 EVALUATION ACTIVITIES RFP responses deemed as having met the standard RFP requirements as indicated herein are then evaluated by an Evaluation Committee. The RFP submittals are scored and assigned a ranking of one (1) through ten (10), ten being the highest possible score. The following criteria have been assigned percentages that the criteria will be scored against: a) Tour verification system's ability to meet the following requirements — 30%: • Use RFID tags, bar codes, QR codes or other approved devices. • Log the hours of patrol through individual scans as guards pass the point. • Use GPS to validate the position of the devices when scanned. • Provide a continuous, real time, GPS track of all vendor owned vehicles' movements and locations. • Include vendor's vehicle speed at any given point in time. • Provide the City with real time web based access to the tour verification system, including but not limited to patrol log, maps with patrol routes and timelines, incident reports, and any other information related to services performed for the City. b) Guard Training Program — 20%: • to ensure guards can meet all the requirements of the RFP, including but not limited to, the appropriate response to unsafe conditions, emergency situations and criminal activity. c) Vendor Resources — 20%: • Vendor provides information that clearly indicates they possess the resources necessary to meet the scope of work, including the ability to staff posts when an individual guard is not available for his scheduled shift or when the City requires special services within one hour. d) Cost —10% e) Reference Checks — 20% Submittals Due: April 12, 2018, by 9:00 AM Page 24 of 41 Page 119 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Proposals ("RFP") # 17/18-009 for Security Guard Services at Various City Facilities 5.3 COST EVALUATION Cost Proposals are evaluated by the Purchasing Division and are scored based on the following calculations; Score = Lowest Proposal Cost / Cost of Proposal being scored X Maximum Points Available (10) The score is then added to the spreadsheet criteria scores. 5.3.1 REFERENCE CHECKS Reference checks are conducted by the Purchasing Division. The department requesting the services may participate in the reference checks. The reference checks may be conducted by phone with the information being scribed or by a written form, submitted to the Consultant's reference contact. Reference contacts will be asked many predetermined questions for response and to provide a score from one (1) to ten (10), ten being the highest. Scores are then tabulated and added to the spreadsheet with the criteria scores. It is imperative that Consultants provide up to date and accurate information regarding contact information for reference checks. All scores are then tabulated into the final Consultant ranking. Evaluators do not see the Vendor References or Cost Proposals. Reference checks are conducted by the Procurement Division and a pass/fail is assigned based off the reference feedback received. Cost Proposals are evaluated by the Procurement Division to ensure that the proposed cost is not over the budget or Not -to -Exceed amount for the project. 5.4 DEMONSTRATIONS/ INTERVIEWS Upon completion of the RFP evaluations and data analysis, and only if the City deems necessary, selected top ranked Vendors will be provided an opportunity to interview and conduct a demonstration or presentation to further expand on their RFP response. Vendor interviews/demonstrations are scored and assigned a ranking of one (1) through ten (10), ten being the highest possible score, based upon but not limited to the evaluation criteria factors as stated within the RFP. 5.5 FINANCIAL DOCUMENTATION Vendors that proceed to the short-list may be required to submit financial documentation as proof of its firm's financial stability and strength. A financial review will be conducted by the City Finance Department. Should a Vendor wish for its financial documentation to be treated as proprietary or be returned upon completion of the review, the documentation must clearly be marked as such. The following documentation will be required of each Vendor on the short-list: • A copy of the Vendor's most recent annual report. Submittals Due: April 12, 2018, by 9:00 AM Page 25 of 41 Page 120 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Proposals ("RFP") # 17/18-009 for Security Guard Services at Various City Facilities • Audited (by a third party), balance sheets and income statements for the past three (3) years. • If audited data is not available, Vendor shall submit copies of complete tax returns for the past three (3) years. • Describe any regulatory censure and past or pending litigation related to services provided by the Vendor. • Indicate all applicable information regarding Vendor ownership changes in the last three (3) years. 5.6 BEST AND FINAL OFFER Upon completion of Vendor presentations and interview the City reserves the right to conduct pre -award discussions and/or pre -contract negotiations with all or only top ranked Vendors. At which time the City may request a Best and Final Offer to be submitted from one or all finalists. 5.7 VENDOR SELECTION The final Vendor selection is based on which Vendor is the most responsive, complying with the City's Scope of Services and Specifications offering the best value at the most competitive price. The City is not obligated to award to the lowest price proposal. The City may conduct negotiations with several Vendors simultaneously. The City may also negotiate contract terms with the selected Firms prior to award. The City, at its sole discretion, reserves the right, unless otherwise stated, to accept or reject all or any RFP responses, or any part thereof, either separately or, or to waive any informality and to split or make the award in any manner determined to be in the best interest of the City. 5.8 LETTER OF INTENT TO AWARD After a final Vendor selection is determined, a Letter of Intent to Award (LOI) will be posted for review by all participating, responsive Vendors. Negotiations shall be confidential and not subject to disclosure to competing Vendors unless an agreement is reached. If contract negotiations cannot be concluded successfully, City may negotiate a contract with the next highest scoring Vendor or withdraw the RFP entirely. 5.9 PARTICIPATION CLAUSE It is hereby understood that other government entities, such as cities, counties, and special/school districts may utilize this RFP response at their option for equipment or services at the RFP response price for a period of days. Said entities shall have the option to participate in any award made Submittals Due: April 12, 2018, by 9:00 AM Page 26 of 41 Page 121 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Proposals ("RFP") # 17/18-009 for Security Guard Services at Various City Facilities because of this solicitation. Any such piggy -back awards will be made independently by each agency, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga is not an agent, partner or representative of these agencies and is not obligated or liable for any action of debts that may arise out of such independently negotiated piggy- back procurement. Each public agency shall accept sole responsibility of its own order placement and payments of the Vendor. Successful Vendor will extend prices as proposed herein to other governmental agencies, please specify. YES NO Submittals Due: April 12, 2018, by 9:00 AM Page 27 of 41 Page 122 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Proposals ("RFP") # 17/18-009 for Security Guard Services at Various City Facilities "EXHIBIT A" CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CONFLICT OF INTEREST/NON-DISCLOSURE STATEMENT It is the policy of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to prevent personal or organizational conflict of interest, or the appearance of such conflict of interest, in the award and administration of City Contracts, including, but not limited to Contracts for Professional Services Agreements ("PSA") with potential Vendors. I do not have specific knowledge of confidential information regarding RFP responses received in response to the Request for Proposal RFP # 17/18-009 for Security Guard Services at Various City Facilities. I agree not to disclose or otherwise divulge any information pertaining to the contents, status, or ranking of any RFP response to anyone. I understand the terms and "disclose or otherwise divulge" to include, but are not limited to, verbal conversations, written correspondence, reproduction of any part or any portion of any RFP response, or removal of same from designated areas. I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the following statements are true and correct and that I understand and agree to be bound by commitments contained herein. (Print Name) (Relationship to the City) (Relationship to the Vendor) (Signature) (Date) Must be included in final RFP submittal. Submittals Due: April 12, 2018, by 9:00 AM Page 28 of 41 Page 123 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Proposals ("RFP") # 17/18-009 for Security Guard Services at Various City Facilities "EXHIBIT B" REFERENCES WORKSHEET The following References Worksheet must be complete, failure to do so the required information will disqualify your Solicitation response. Provide a minimum of four (4) clients that are similar in size to the City of Rancho Cucamonga /that your company has conducted comparable or like services. Preferred references should be government agencies and be a current customer within the past three (3) years. Please verify accuracy of contact information. To be submitted as a separate attachment in conjunction with the RFP response. Reference 1 Company Name Contact Name and Title Company Address Contact Telephone Number Contact Email Description of Comparative Services and Project Cost (please be specific) Reference 2 Company Name Contact Name and Title Company Address Contact Telephone Number Contact Email Description of Comparative Services and Project Cost (please be specific) Submittals Due: April 12, 2018, by 9:00 AM Page 29 of 41 Page 124 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Proposals ("RFP") # 17/18-009 for Security Guard Services at Various City Facilities Company Name Contact Name and Title Company Address Contact Telephone Number Contact Email Description of Comparative Service Project Cost (please be specific) Company Name Contact Name and Title Company Address Contact Telephone Number Contact Email Description of Comparative Service Project Cost (please be specific) s and s and Must be included in final RFP submittal. Submittals Due: April 12, 2018, by 9:00 AM Page 30 of 41 Page 125 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Proposals ("RFP") # 17/18-009 for Security Guard Services at Various City Facilities "EXHIBIT C" PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT Mark the appropriate choice, below: Me EXCEPTIONS SUMMARY Vendor accepts the PSA without exception. Vendor proposes exceptions to the PSA. Summarize all exceptions on a separate document. Enclose a written summary of each change and title as "Exception Summary", which shall include the Vendor's rationale for proposing each such exception. Each exception must be labeled with the Section number in the PSA. Failure to properly reference exceptions in the submitted summary may deem the response as non-responsive. Signature Printed Name Title Date Must be included in final RFP submittal. Submittals Due: April 12, 2018, by 9:00 AM Page 31 of 41 Page 126 I City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Proposals ("RFP") # 17/18-009 for Security Guard Services at Various City Facilities "EXHIBIT D" ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS AND CERTIFICATION OF ABILITY TO PROVIDE the (President, Secretary, Manager, Owner or Representative) of , certify that the (Name of Company, Corporation or Owner) Specifications and General Provisions regarding insurance requirements as stated within the Professional Services Agreement (PSA), for the Purchase Contract designated Request for Proposal ("RFP") # 17/18-009 for Security Guard Services at Various City Facilities have been read and understood and that our Vendor is able to provide and maintain the coverage as specified in the PSA. Failure to provide said coverage, upon request to finalize the PSA prior to award shall be sufficient cause for immediate disqualification of award. Failure to maintain said coverage shall result in termination of the contract. Signature Printed Name Title Date Must be included in final RFP submittal. Submittals Due: April 12, 2018, by 9:00 AM Page 32 of 41 Page 127 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Proposals ("RFP") # 17/18-009 for Security Guard Services at Various City Facilities "EXHIBIT E" ADDENDUM ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The Vendor hereby acknowledges the following Addenda Number(s) to this RFP have been received, if any. Vendor understands failure to acknowledge any addenda issued may cause the RFP response to be considered non-responsive. It is the Vendor's responsibility to log into the Bid System to identify and download the number of addenda that have been posted. Signature Printed Name Title Date Must be included in final RFP submittal. Submittals Due: April 12, 2018, by 9:00 AM Page 33 of 41 Page 128 City of Rancho Cucamonga Request for Proposals ("RFP") # 17/18-009 for Security Guard Services at Various City Facilities "EXHIBIT F" VENDOR CERTIFICATION FORM I certify that neither (Vendor) nor any of its proposed subcontractors are currently under suspension or debarment by any state or federal government agency, and that neither Vendor nor any of its proposed subcontractors are tax delinquent with the State of California. I acknowledge that if Vendor or any of its subcontractors subsequently are placed under suspension or debarment by a local, state or federal government entity, or if Vendor or any of its subcontractors subsequently become delinquent in California taxes, our Proposal may be disqualified. Signature Printed Name Title Date Must be included in final RFP submittal. Submittals Due: April 12, 2018, by 9:00 AM Page 34 of 41 Page 129 Page 130 "Attachment A" Site Location Maps Page 131 Page 132 F� Submittals Due: April 12, 2018, by 9:00 AM Page 36 of 41 Page 133 is7 • ■ ■ w r Submittals Due: April 12, 2018, by 9:00 AM Page 38 of 41 Page 135 E� it Mae VwH0-Al7v7 •VD"OWV7r13 01i3nvu 3nN3AV CIV9114a 1V 99CL Submittals Due: April 12, 2018, by 9:00 AM Page 38 of 41 Page 135 Submittals Due: April 12, 2018, by 9:00 AM Page 39 of 41 Page 136 Submittals Due: April 12, 2018, by 9:00 AM Page 40 of 41 Page 137 Page 138 "EXHIBIT G" SIGNATURE OF AUTHORITY The undersigned firm declares that he/she has carefully examined the specifications and read the above terms and conditions, and hereby proposes and agrees, if this RFP response is accepted, to furnish all material in accordance with the specifications and instructions, in the time and manner therein prescribed for the unit cost amounts set forth in the following RFP response. THE VENDOR IN SUBMITTING THIS RFP RESPONSE MUST FILL IN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION. FAILURE TO DO SO MAY DEEM YOUR RFP RESPONSE AS NON-RESPONSIVE. Company Name: Address: (Street, Su. # City, State, Zip) Telephone #: Fax #: E-mail address: Web Address: Authorized Representative: (print) Title: Signature: Date: Must be included in final RFP submittal. Submittals Due: April 12, 2018, by 9:00 AM Page 41 of 41 Page 139 Page 140 EXHIBIT B SCOPE OF SERVICES — PART 2 ABSOLUTE SECURITY INTERNATIONAL, INC. Proposal Dated April 12, 2018 Clarifications 1 and 2 Dated July 3, 2018 Page 141 Page 142 mrrs` �[ 7 A GLUM MIERNATION4OLC"MTYUur REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR SECURITY GUARD SERVICES AT VARIOUS CITY FACILITIES RFP NO. 17/18-009 RANCHO CUCAMONGA BUSINESS PROPOSAL (ORIGINAL) To: Evaluation Committee 10500 Civic Center, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 From: Absolute International Security 4255 Tyler Avenue, El Monte, CA 91731 (626) 858-7188 Lucy Lin, President/QM April 12, 2018 4255 Tyler Ave, EI Monte, CA 91731 Telephone: (626) 858-7188 Facsimile: (626) 858-2882 Toll Free: (866) 969-7188 Page 143 ,0ucsua&rr _TY l�'`---' (D . ABSOLUTEATERNATIOML As_ fIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIV���_u� s IIfIIIIIIIIIIIII,�,., :rr� b,o° I. Cover Letter April 12, 2018 Evaluation Committee City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Evaluation Committee, Thank you for the opportunity and privilege to join this bid and to introduce the Professional Security Services offered by Absolute Security International, Inc. dba Absolute International Security (AIS). Our company is located at 4255 Tyler Avenue, El Monte, CA 91731. You can reach our main office by calling (626) 858-7188 or Toll Free (866) 969-7188. Our Federal Employer Identification Number (FEIN) is: 26-3437797. AIS would like to emphasize the priority we put on having the best possible executive management team. Our president has worked in the private security industry for more than 25 years, specializing in various public contracts in the City of Los Angeles and other cities spread throughout her suburbs. In addition, our operations team has over 115 years of combined Law Enforcement, Corporate Security, and Airport Police/Security experience bringing extensive knowledge in the specific fields of training, mentoring, and customer service to help better serve the client, you. The overvalued quality of any security services company in this industry is the size and years of the business. What truly differentiates companies is their executive management team — how strategies, culture, and supervision can be tailored to fit each unique client. A business is not only supported by its ability to produce its products or services, but mainly by its ability to reach out to a broad yet individualized spectrum on consumers. A business should always stay focused on where its responsibility truly lies — to the customers. To adapt to today's economic trends, AIS will provide flexible and customizable solutions to meet your security and safety needs while also staying within your budget. We aim to provide the highest quality of professional and personalized security services and to follow through with unparalleled supervision and client support. Regardless of the time and urgency of the situation, you will always be able to reach somebody at AIS who will be able to assist you. We have our own in-house Training Facility with a Coordinator and instructors who manage and supervise all training requirements mandated by the State of California as well as any additional training required by the client. We require our officers to have guard cards issued by the State of California Department of Consumer Affairs (DCA). AIS and our Training Coordinator is also state licensed and ready to train our security officers as needed in various curriculums required by the State and our clients. 4255 Tyler Ave EI Monte, CA 91731 Telephone: (626) 858-7188 Facsimile: (626) 858-2882 Toll Free: (866) 969-7188 Page 144 ,0u u�MERNATIOML_1�`�'ABSOLUTE A1S_ IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII�� 1L:LLL _ Stalel.ic:uPP 16302 We also have our own in-house 24 hours Dispatch Center, which will provide great service to our client. It includes dispatch to supervisors for schedule changes or emergencies, a check-in and checkout system, a Deggy System, etc. We value this opportunity and hope that you will find our commitment to client support exceptional and our pricing competitive and allow us to serve you. We are confident that our security team will provide the knowledge and expertise in the field of safety and security to meet your contract specifications. STATEMENT 1: AIS hereby confirms we have reviewed all the documents referenced and made a part of the solicitation document to ensure all information required to properly respond has been submitted or made available and all requirements are priced in the RFP response. STATEMENT 2: AIS hereby confirms we shall be responsible for knowledge of all items and conditions contained in our RFP responses and in the RFP# 17/18-009, including any City issued clarifications, modifications, amendments, or addenda. STATEMENT 3: AIS hereby confirms it meets all insurance requirements as outlined in the Professional Services Agreement. STATEMENT 4: AIS hereby confirms we have received Addendum# 1 on April 2, 2018. Should you have any questions or concerns about this proposal, please do not hesitate to contact me at (626) 858-7188 or email: llin@absolutesecurityintl.com. Thank you. Best Regards, Lucy J. Lin President & QM Absolute Security International, Inc. dba Absolute International Security (AIS) 4255 Tyler Ave EI Monte, CA 91731 Telephone: (626) 858-7188 Facsimile: (626) 858-2882 Toll Free: (866) 969-7188 Page 145 oumcakrr _ ABSOLUTEATERMT10ML A �� �� f��w��f�Af�fffIIIIIIIfIIIIIIIIIIIIIfV���du '--2U I. Cover Letter/Introduction......................................................................... 1-2 II. Table of Contents....................................................................................... III. Executive Summary.................................................................................. 3 IV. Experience.........................................................................................4-39 A. Company Profile................................................................................. 4 B. Differentiation....................................................................................5 C. Service Descriptions........................................................................... 6-8 D. Experience with Tour Verification and Real Time Reporting Capabilities .............. 9 E. Scope of Services........................................................................... 10-19 F. Quality Assurance Plan.................................................................... 20-21 G. Staffing Plan.................................................................................... 22 H. Operations Chart and Service Procedures...................................................23 I. Training/Dispatch Center.................................................................. 24-27 J. Emergency Response Plan................................................................ 28-31 K. Hiring and Background Check Procedures ............................................. 32-33 L. Orientation Program....................................................................... 33-35 M. Financial Stability Statement.................................................................. 36 N. Summary of Insurances.................................................................... 37-38 - Sample of Certificate of Insurance...................................................... 39 V. Third-Party/Subcontractors........................................................................40 VI. Staff Biographies................................................................................ 43-52 A. Management Team Experience...............................................................43 4255 Tyler Ave EI Monte, CA 91731 Telephone: (626) 858-7188 Facsimile: (626) 858-2882 Toll Free: (866) 969-7188 Page 146 �ucs�ci,�ry _TY ABSOLUTEATERNATIOML also IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIfIIIIIIIIIIIIIIV��� s ,�,., :rr� b,o° B. Organization Chart ............................................................................. 44 C. Management Resumes..................................................................... 45-52 VII. Certificates and Licenses....................................................................... 53-56 A. Private Patrol Operator License, Firearms and Baton Training Facility License...... 53 B. CALSAGA Membership Certificate.........................................................54 C. NRA Membership Certificate................................................................. 55 D. IACLEA Membership Certificate............................................................ 56 VIII. Sample Reports — Daily Activity Report — Incident Report — Supervisor Report — Disciplinary Action Notice — Quality Assurance Inspection Report — Guard Timesheet — Guard Sign In/Out Sheet — Parking Violation Warning — Emergency Action Plan — Fire Watch — Bomb Threat Receive Form — Daily Vehicle Inspection — Patrol Tag 4255 Tyler Ave EI Monte, CA 91731 Telephone: (626) 858-7188 Facsimile: (626) 858-2882 Toll Free: (866) 969-7188 Page 147 OucsEcakrr ABSOLUTEATERMT10ML A�S �II�II��I��II��I II��IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIV��� s,�,, rr�b,o ° ATIONAL, INCORPORATED dba Absolute International Security (AIS) is a fully insured and licensed Private Patrol Operator with the Bureau of Security and Investigation Services, Department of Consumer Affairs in Sacramento California. Our business provides private security services in both armed and unarmed security guards, stationary and vehicle patrols, security consulting, loss prevention, security for work place violence, threat assessment, crime, and fraud investigation. We provide services to government projects, private companies, personal and dignitary protection, special events, etc. We also provide services to airports, libraries, schools, banks, hospitals, manufacturers, construction sites, shopping centers, supermarkets, hotels, restaurants, parking facilities, etc. To track and record our security officer's whereabouts, we utilize the Deggy Monitoring System to ensure our guards are efficiently gMdng out their responsibilities. Our entire fleet of patrol vehicles are equipped with advanced GPS units. This enables an extra layer of supervision and monitoring that AIS provides to our customers. AIS takes pride that we are a proactive company that will prevent any issues from occurring based on our expertise. Furthermore, we are prepared to take on any challenges that may arise. We will immediately find the best possible solution to ensure the expectations of our clients are met. We have an emergency response protocol that all our officers have knowledge of. They know what procedures to follow for each emergency that arises whether its fires, robberies, riots, accident/injuries (train, bus, or car), bomb threats, blackouts, earthquakes, storms, terror activities, et c. Our guards are required to have been fully trained for a post before they are assigned there. In 2014 we redeveloped and expanded our BSIS Licensed Trainingfacility at our corporate site to ensure all BSIS mandatory compliance courses/curriculum are met by our guards and supervisors in order to accomplish our client's needs. AIS has established our own 24-hour in-house Dispatch/Communication Center and currently have 6 staff members working in this department exclusively for our Operations Department. It provides efficient communication between our clients, guards, the patrol supervisors, and the top management. The goal of our Dispatch Center is to support our security personnel, so they can meet every expectation expected by our clients. 4255 Tyler Ave EI Monte, CA 91731 Telephone: (626) 858-7188 Facsimile: (626) 858-2882 Toll Free: (866) 969-7188 Page 148 �ucs�ca�rrr _ ABSOLUTEATERMT10ML "�'s-� I�����fIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIfIIIIIIIIIIIIIIV���_u�� �s��,.,,�rr�b,o� ���° Absolute Security International, Inc. dba Absolute International Security (AIS) was incorporated in the city of Covina on September 26, 2008 as a C Corporation, and was established by the President, Ms. Lucy Lin, in the beginning of 2009. AIS is a licensed private patrol operator approved through the Bureau of Security and Investigative Services (BSIS) and has been in business for over 9 years. Our hours of operation are from Monday through Friday 9AM to 6PM. Additionally, we have our Dispatch Center that is open 24 hours a day, 7 days a week to answer any of our client's concerns or assist our security personnel. This ensures that we will always have someone to answer your calls at any time. We have over 115 years of combined security management experience and have served many government municipalities. We have excessive experience and capabilities to perform the requirements of this RFP. Our level of expertise includes private security, loss prevention, security and safety training, threat assessment, crime & fraud investigation, conciliation, mediation and legal business matters. We provide multi-level customized security protection to federal, state and local governments. We are involved in various aspects of the security industry including: • Armed and unarmed security guards • Stationary and vehicle patrols • Security consulting • Personal protection • Loss prevention consultation • Security and safety training • Security for workplace violence • Law enforcement • Threat assessment • Crime and fraud investigation You can find our officers covering sites including: • Government facilities • Transit stations • Banks • School Districts • Manufacturers • Construction sites • Stores • Shopping centers • Supermarkets • Hotels • Apartments • Restaurants • Parking facilities • Special events AIS currently serves over 60 contract accounts in the immediate Southern California area. We have hundreds of highly trained unarmed, armed, and off-duty law enforcement officers. All employees are licensed as mandated by the Bureau of Security and Investigative Services (BSIS). Our clients may also request that our officers know CPR/AED Certified and other specialized training. AIS aims to provide the highest quality of professional security services, reflecting the extensive experience our management has accumulated over the years. Our motto is to listen and understand our client's unique and individual needs and, utilizing our experiences and innovation, to put together a customized package well below their budget. 4255 Tyler Ave EI Monte, CA 91731 4 Telephone: (626) 858-7188 Facsimile: (626) 858-2882 Toll Free: (866) 969-7188 Page 149 ,0ucsua&rr _l�'`---' (D . 711 ABSOLUTEATERNATIOML SE(UMTY As_ fIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIfIIIIIIIIIIIIIIVE �L _uU s ,�,., :rr� b,o° B. Differentiation Absolute Security International, Inc. continuously strives to improve our portfolio to provide the best possible services to our clients. We are always looking for new technologies, methods, and strategies that make our services more effective, more efficient, and more inexpensive. The following is a list of focal points that AIS has determined would diversify our portfolio and make us stand out in our industry. • Absolute Security International provides superb customer service 24 hours a day, 7 days a week by operating our own IN-HOUSE Dispatch Center. This ensures real-time responses and updates to our clients. • In -House, Licensed Training Center taught by a BSIS certified training instructor. This allows us the unique ability to continuously conduct in-house training, recruit from a highly trained, qualified class of topnotch security officers, and offer advancement opportunities to officers who want additional certifications. • Our entire fleet of patrol vehicles is equipped with advanced GPS units. This enables an extra layer of supervision and monitoring that AIS provides to our customers. • Deggy Monitoring System is a security officer patrol monitoring system which enables us to digitally track and record our security officers' patrolling patterns. This allows AIS to review security officer movements to ensure that they are properly trained and are accountable for their responsibilities. • Proud Member of CALSAGA, the California Association of Licensed Security Agencies, Guards & Associates (CALSAGA); Proud Member of the NRA, the National Rifle Association (NRA); Proud Member of IACLEA, the International Association of Campus Law Enforcement Administrators (IACLEA) • Comprehensive Insurance Coverage, which includes crime insurance and Terrorism Risk Insurance, a program within the US Department of Treasury that specifies the government shares the risk of loss from terrorist attacks. • Financial Stability, AIS possesses a strong bond ability and has satisfactory credit lines from multiple reputable banks as well as sufficient cash flow to support our operations. • Use of Force Training, our officers are trained on how they should defend themselves to protect both our client's assets as well as their own lives from endangerment, but only when necessary in the most unlikely situations. We will always stress the significance of calling the proper authorities first and foremost. • Company -wide no -smoking policy to protect the job -site from cigarette smells and waste, the health of our personnel, and the environment. We believe the cleaner presentation and image of no -smoking is a key factor in the success of a security officer. 4255 Tyler Ave EI Monte, CA 91731 Telephone: (626) 858-7188 Facsimile: (626) 858-2882 Toll Free: (866) 969-7188 Page 150 �ucs�ca�rr TI TYABSOLUTEATE� O L SLCUM IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII EE L C. Service Descriptions At AIS, our management team has more than 115 years of combined experience in private security service, and we offer the following services: • Standard security guard services • Personal & dignitary protection • Government security services • Security & safety training • Security for workplace violence • Threat Assessment • Crime and fraud investigation • Special events • Mediation & conciliation AIS provides multilevel security services for individuals, businesses, and governments of all sizes such as for airports, hospitals, libraries, schools, banks, manufacturers, shopping centers, construction sites, supermarkets, hotels, residential & apartment complexes, restaurants, parking facilities, etc. AIS covers locations within LA County, Orange County and San Bernardino County. Security Officer Management: Our Operations Management Team is comprised of highly qualified and highly experienced former Police Officers and Military Veterans who have developed laterally relevant skillsets that are highly effective when applied to managing a Security Team or Security Services Program. Standard- Issue Security uniform at the City of Downey & various other service locations: 4255 Tyler Ave EI Monte, CA 91731 Telephone: (626) 858-7188 Facsimile: (626) 858-2882 Toll Free: (866) 969-7188 Page 151 QeyeaiEs¢ci��ry _p�`---' ABSOLUTEATEMATIOML As_ IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIV���_u�.RM Discrete Security uniform available for clients at various locations in Southern California: Security Supervisor's attire: I Bureau of Security Investigative Service approved badge: 4255 Tyler Ave EI Monte, CA 91731 Telephone: (626) 858-7188 Facsimile: (626) 858-2882 Toll Free: (866) 969-7188 Page 152 ,0u u&MERNATIOML_1�`�'ABSOLUTE A1�S_ IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIV�u�:U�'i. _ Stalel.ic i 16302 Company Marked Vehicles: AIS currently has clearly marked, well-maintained, and GPS - tracked security vehicles for use by our security supervisors & personnel, as required. Metal signs: At our client's request, AIS also provides metal signs to be prominently displayed on the site perimeter to inform passersby that the facility has Security on Duty. The signs boldly read PATROLLED & PROTECTED along with a 1-800 number that connects to our 24/7 Dispatch Center should someone on the property need help or wants to report an incident that requires immediate attention. These signs also serve as free promotion for our Security Services. IFPATROLLED & i PK0TECTED wam1•wo l y -T 1 ( 866 ) 969.7188 100% Client Satisfaction: Our clients will have 24/7 access to our Communications Dispatch Center. Clients can call our Communications Dispatch Center at any time via the toll-free number (866) 969-7188. A live agent will always be available to answer the call and assist with any questions or connect the call to the proper channels for resolving any concern, regardless of what the issue is. We are always prepared to respond to any situation 4255 Tyler Ave EI Monte, CA 91731 Telephone: (626) 858-7188 Facsimile: (626) 858-2882 Toll Free: (866) 969-7188 Page 153 ,0ucsua&rr (D . ABSOLUTEATERNATIOML SE(UMTY_l�'`---' As_ fIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIfIIIIIIIIIIIIIIVE �L _uU s ,�,., :rr� b,o° D. Experience with Tour Verification and Real Time Reporting Capabilities Absolute International Security takes pride in the fact that we are well experienced in tour verification and reporting capabilities. We have provided numerous of our clients with our Deggy Monitoring System to track our guard's whereabouts and send our clients the necessary reports (DAR, IR, Supervisor's Reports et c.) in a timely manner. Our guards are required to check in with our Dispatch Center at the beginning and end of their shifts to verify their presence at their job sites. This helps us keep track of our guards reporting to work. Tour Verification For tracking and recording our security guards' whereabouts, AIS uses the Deggy Monitoring System to ensure our guards are efficiently carrying out their duties at your sites. It enables us to digitally track and record our security officer's patrols. We will strategically place a microchip miniature steel button throughout your locations. The security guard at the site will perform his patrol and touch these buttons with a special microchip reader called the Deggy Pen. This Deggy Pen collects data throughout the security guards patrol or tour as he goes around your facility. At the end of each round, the guard will download the "Deggy Pen" on to the Deggy Web remote. All of the security guard's movements and patrols are collected. We can then print out a detailed report that can be made available to our clients on a monthly basis or upon request. Each patrol is electronically recorded to ensure quality of service and provide our clients with consistent verification that the security services are achieved. Our field supervisors conduct frequent checks to make sure the Deggy System is working properly at the jobsites. Furthermore, our entire fleet of patrol vehicles are equipped with advanced GPS units. This allows an extra layer of supervision and monitoring to track our guards' patrols to ensure the services are being met. Upon the client's request, we will download and print from the GPS web system the patrolling pattern of any of our patrol vehicles. if they ever need to verify the guard's patrol routes. We are able to provide a continuous, real time, GPS track of all vehicles' movements and locations, including but not limited to patrol log, maps with patrol routes and timelines, and the vehicle speed can be given at any point in time. Real Time Reporting Capabilities All AIS security guards are required to complete a Daily Activity Report (DAR) after each of their shift. They will then scan and email the report immediately to our email portal in which the operations management team will be able to have access to. All the reports including will be sent to this email, identifying which site and shift its from. Upon request from our client, we will provide them with these reports daily. If a guard is to run into any issues during his shift that demands attention, he is to call the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department to let them know about the issue, then contact our 24/7 communications center, who will contact operations management team, who will then notify the City of Rancho Cucamonga representative about the issue. AIS takes pride that we are a proactive company that will prevent any issues from occurring. We have an emergency response protocol that all our officers have knowledgeof. They know what procedures to follow for each emergency that arises whether its fires, robberies, riots, accident/injuries (train, bus, or car), bomb threats, blackouts, earthquakes, storms, terror activities, et c. Our guards will be able to respond to these types of issues and take the next essential step. 4255 Tyler Ave EI Monte, CA 91731 Telephone: (626) 858-7188 Facsimile: (626) 858-2882 Toll Free: (866) 969-7188 Page 154 �ucs�ca�rrr _ ABSOLUTEATERNATIOML a'ss��,�,., E. Scope of Services AIS shall furnish the City with all necessary expertise, labor, management, materials, uniforms, equipment uniformed personal, vehicles, supplies, training, licenses, permits and insurance to perform security service at Rancho Cucamonga Various City Facilities. I. General Requirements To include but not be limited to the following: a. AIS possesses a current private operator's number/Private Patrol Permit number from the State of California Department of Consumer affairs, bureau of Security and Investigative Services. The contract will be automatically nullified should the license become expired, suspended or revoked. b. AIS have at least five (5) years continuous professional experience in providing and managing security services in similar settings. Experience providing services to local governments preferred. c. AIS have no record of unsatisfactory performance. d. Security Guards provided by the AIS shall be registered with the California Department of Consumer Affairs and shall possess a current, valid Guard Registration Card while on duty. e. Security Guards shall be trained and certified and have at least three (3) years continuous professional experience. f. AIS will be able to enter a PSA with the City and comply with all Insurance requirements stated therein. g. Each security guard provided by AIS shall have the ability to read and write the English language; understand and carry out oral and written directions; think and act quickly and effectively in emergencies; and write accurate and clear reports. h. AIS shall ensure that Security Officers are neat in appearance and wear a uniform with name tag of the type normally worn in commercial security services. i. If a contract is awarded pursuant to this RFP, AIS shall furnish, install and maintain electronic patrol tour verification devices at all locations for which services are provided under said contract. j. The tour verification system shall; 1. Use RFID tags, bar codes, QR codes or other approved devices at locations to be provided by the City after award of contract. 4255 Tyler Ave EI Monte, CA 91731 10 Telephone: (626) 858-7188 Facsimile: (626) 858-2882 Toll Free: (866) 969-7188 Page 155 ,0ucsua&rr (E) ABSOLUTEMERNATIOML SE(UMTY l�'`- -' Sbtl 1 i PP0 16302 2. Log the hours of patrol through individual scans as guards pass the point. 3. Use GPS to validate the position of the devices when scanned. 4. Provide a continuous, real time, GPS track of all guards' movements and locations during service hours. 5. Provide a separate continuous, real time, GPS track of all AIS owned vehicles' movements and locations during service hours. The vehicle log shall include vehicle speed at any given point in time. 6. Provide the City with real time web -based access to the tour verification system, including but not limited to patrol log, maps with patrol routes and timelines, incident reports, and any other information related to services performed for the City. 7. Be in place and fully operational within thirty days of the notice to proceed. 8. Notify the City if the system goes off-line for any reason during the term of the contract. If the system is off-line the daily log portion of the daily activity reports required in section 4.21 below shall be submitted to the City Representative within 24 hours of the end of each shift at the affected locations. Failure to provide daily activity reports during system outages within 24 hours of the end of each shift will result in deductions pursuant to Section 4.5a. 9. Have the capability to be back online with 72 hours of an outage. Failure to have the tour verification system online within 72 hours will result in deductions pursuant to Section 1.5b. k. Uniforms shall be furnished by AIS as well as flashlights, batteries, cell phones, radios, security vehicles, reporting forms, electronic patrol tour verification devices and other supplies needed to perform duties as described herein. 1. AIS shall prepare daily activity reports for each building/shift for which services are provided under this contract. The daily activity report shall include the daily log prepared by the guard on duty, a printout of the scan log from the tour verification system and a printout of the GPS track recording the guard's location throughout the shift. Daily activity reports shall be submitted to the City Representative on a weekly basis by 12:00 noon on Tuesday of the following week except as required by section 4.2h (8) In addition, all daily activity reports for a billing period shall be submitted with each invoice. in. AIS shall notify the City Representative by telephone of any accidents or incidents occurring on City property. Said notification shall be made as soon 4255 Tyler Ave EI Monte, CA 91731 11 Telephone: (626) 858-7188 Facsimile: (626) 858-2882 Toll Free: (866) 969-7188 Page 156 ,0ucsui,&ry MERNATIOML l�'�---�(D . ABSOLUTE as the situation has stabilized, and it is safe for the guard to do so. In addition, an incident report shall be prepared for all significant incidents occurring during each shift. If there were no significant incidents during a shift an incident report shall be prepared stating that no significant incidents occurred during the shift. Incident reports shall be submitted to the City Representative on a weekly basis by 12:00 noon on Tuesday of the following week unless requested sooner by the City representative. In addition, all incident reports for a billing period shall be submitted with each invoice. n. AIS will maintain daily, weekly and monthly statistics for incident reports, electronic patrol tour reports and provide written reports to the Facilities Superintendent attached to the monthly invoices or upon request. o. AIS will exercise professional judgment and caution in responding to or discovering unsafe conditions, emergency situations and criminal activity. AIS will be solely responsible to provide training of all Security Officers in the appropriate response to unsafe conditions, emergency situations and criminal activity. p. AIS may be required to provide Security Officers upon special request of the City to arrive within a one-hour period. This may include crowd control, site/perimeter security, secure transportation of performers, and personal protection for performers and/or VIP talent security in relation to performances at City venues. q. Upon award of a contract, AIS shall identify a contact that will be assigned and responsible for management of the contract and coordination of services directly with the City's contact identified within the PSA. All changes in schedules, requests for service, additional services, etc. shall be mutually agreed upon by way of Addendum signed by both parties, prior to any changes in service being made. r. Additional service charges shall be in accordance to those rates quoted herein. Any changes in scope, schedules, additional services, etc. shall be denied payment unless documented in writing by way of Addendum and signed by both parties. s. Post orders shall be established for all locations regularly serviced. AIS is required to submit and review post orders with named City contact or designee prior to execution of said agreement. The City reserves the right to adjust post orders as situations require assuring the best protection of the City, its property and the public. 4255 Tyler Ave EI Monte, CA 91731 12 Telephone: (626) 858-7188 Facsimile: (626) 858-2882 Toll Free: (866) 969-7188 Page 157 �ucs�ca�rrr TI TYABSOLUTEATE� O L SLCUM A1S. 1111ffIIIIfII1II1II1IIIIIIIIII1II1II1II1IhE�L_UUL, Sbtl Li- PPO 16102 II. Security Officer Specifications To include but not be limited to the following; a. Guard the property against fire, theft, damage, vandalism and graffiti. b. Report and document, in accordance with procedures, any unusual activity, hazardous conditions, damage or situations that may develop into potential facility damage and /or suspicious activity. c. Maintain daily log for each shift, incident reports and activity reports as required. d. Appropriately respond to potential and actual emergencies such as fire, medical, situations or threats to the public, City staff or property. e. Check that all exterior doors are locked after business hours. f. Carry a radio or phone for immediate contact with AIS's Dispatch Center and the City of Rancho Cucamonga Police Station. g. Carry all devices necessary to implement the requirements for the tour verifications system described herein. h. Carry emergency telephone numbers for AIS's Dispatch Center and City staff always and maintain confidentiality of contact list. Understand and can implement facility patrol procedures as well as AIS's patrol procedures. j. Politely interact with the public and always maintain a professional demeanor. III. Service Locations and Specifications A. Epicenter/Sports Complex - 8408 Rochester Ave. M -F 8pm-3am, Sat. 12pm to 6pm, 7pm-3am, Sun. 7pm-3am (57 hrs./wks.) Provide standing Security Guard services for forty (40) acre site that incorporates a Minor League Baseball Stadium, six (6) sports fields, and seven (7) parking lots. Services include patrol routes, special events security, walkout service for staff, weekend crowd control, parking lot monitoring, and loss control. AIS is to furnish, install and maintain electronic patrol tour verification devices at this location. A map of device placement will be provided after award of contract. B. Metrolink Station - 11208 Azusa Court at Milliken M -F 4am-11: 00pm, Sat 6: 00am-1: 00am, Sun 6: 00am-10: 30pm (110.5 hrs./wks) Provide standing Security Guard services for Metrolink train station and adjoining parking lots. Services include platform security, patrol routes and 4255 Tyler Ave EI Monte, CA 91731 13 Telephone: (626) 858-7188 Facsimile: (626) 858-2882 Toll Free: (866) 969-7188 Page 158 ,0ucsua&rr MERNATIOML _ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I B �'- (D ABSOLUTE SE(UMTY A1S_-.1 Sale[A PPOIM2 parking lot surveillance. AIS is to furnish, install and maintain electronic patrol tour verification devices at this location. A map of device placement will be provided after award of contract. C. Animal Care and Adoption Center -11780 Arrow Route M -Sun. 7pm-8pm (7 hrs./wks) Provide standing Security Guard services for the Animal Care and Adoption Center. This location requires interaction with the public and city staff, and walkout service for staff. AIS is to furnish, install and maintain electronic patrol tour verification devices at this location. A map of device placement will be provided after award of contract. D. Additive/Alternate Bid Item 1: Park Restroom Night Lock -Up and Gate Closure - Various Locations (Does not include gate at Etiwanda Preserve) Provide park restroom night lock-up and gate closure at the parks listed in Table 1. AIS is to furnish, install and maintain electronic patrol tour verification devices at these locations. If there is significant group activity in the park, the restrooms/gates are to be left open and the activity noted in the log. No return trip to the park is required. All restrooms and gates are to be closed during the time intervals indicated in Table 1. Park Restroom Night Lock -Up and Gate Closure is not required on the following holidays: New Year's Eve, July 4th, Halloween, Thanksgiving Eve, Thanksgiving, Christmas Eve, and Christmas Day. All other holidays will be paid at regular daily rates. Daily reports from the tour verification system documenting the date/time of restroom/gate lockup and any exceptions are to be provided to the Parks Supervisor daily. Table 1 Location Name Address Notes Foothill Restroom lockup only at 10:00 pm every day. Do Trailhead 8500 Foothill Blvd not lock gates Close restrooms between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 Los Amigos Park 8625 Madrone Avenue a.m. seven (7) days per week. Close restrooms between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 Golden Oak 9345 Golden Oak Rd a.m. seven (7) days per week. 4255 Tyler Ave EI Monte, CA 91731 14 Telephone: (626) 858-7188 Facsimile: (626) 858-2882 Toll Free: (866) 969-7188 Page 159 �ucs�ca�rrr ABSOLUTE I A15 Old Town �g Ats a.m. 4255 Tyler Ave EI Monte, CA 91731 15 Telephone: (626) 858-7188 Facsimile: (626) 858-2882 Toll Free: (866) 969-7188 Page 160 Close restrooms between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 Old Town 10033 Feron Blvd a.m. seven (7) days per week. Close restrooms between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 Church 10190 Church St a.m. Pkwy seven (7) days per week. Close restrooms between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 Hermosa 6787 Hermosa Ave a.m. seven (7) days per week. Close restrooms between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 Ralph M. Lewis 7898 Elm St a.m. seven (7) days per week. Close restrooms between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 Spruce 7730 Spruce Ave a.m. seven (7) days per week. Close restrooms between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 West Greenway 7756 Meadowcrest Ct a.m. seven (7) days per week. 10987 Terra Vista Close restrooms between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 Coyote Canyon Pkwy a.m. seven (7) days per week. 4255 Tyler Ave EI Monte, CA 91731 15 Telephone: (626) 858-7188 Facsimile: (626) 858-2882 Toll Free: (866) 969-7188 Page 160 Close restrooms between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 Milliken 7699 Milliken Ave a.m. seven (7) days per week. Close restrooms between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 Mountain View 11701 Terra Vista a.m. Pkwy seven (7) days per week. Close restrooms between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 Garcia 13150 Garcia Drive a.m. seven (7) days per week. Close restrooms and gate between 10:00 p.m. and Victoria Arbors 7429 Arbor Lane 2:00 a.m. seven (7) days per week. Do not lock gates if vehicles are in parking lot Close restrooms between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 Ellena 7139 Kenyon Way a.m. seven (7) days per week. 4255 Tyler Ave EI Monte, CA 91731 15 Telephone: (626) 858-7188 Facsimile: (626) 858-2882 Toll Free: (866) 969-7188 Page 160 �ucs�ca�rrr ABSOLUTE I A15 Kenyon �g Ats a.m. 4255 Tyler Ave EI Monte, CA 91731 16 Telephone: (626) 858-7188 Facsimile: (626) 858-2882 Toll Free: (866) 969-7188 Page 161 Close restrooms between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 Kenyon 11481 Kenyon Way a.m. seven (7) days per week. Close restrooms between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 Victoria Groves 6840 Fairmont a.m. seven (7) days per week. 11745 Victoria Park Close restrooms between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 Vintage Ln a.m. seven (7) days per week. Close restrooms between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 Windrows 6849 Victoria Park Ln a.m. seven (7) days per week. Close restrooms between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 Day Creek 12350 Banyan St a.m. seven (7) days per week. Close restrooms and gates, including east and west dog park gates, between 11:00 p.m. and Etiwanda Creek 5939 East Ave 2:00 a.m. seven (7) days per week. Drive down access road to insure no vehicles are present before locking gate. 13931 Youngs Close restrooms between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 Olive Grove Canyon a.m. Rd seven (7) days per week. Close restrooms between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 Legacy 5858 Santa Ynez PI a.m. seven (7) days per week. Close restrooms between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 Rancho Summit 5958 Soledad Way a.m. seven (7) days per week. Close restrooms between 11:00 p.m. and 2:00 East Beryl 6524 Beryl St a.m. seven (7) days per week. Close restrooms, park gate and equestrian center gate between 11:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. seven (7) Heritage 5546 Beryl St days per week. Do not lock gates if vehicles are in parking lot Close restrooms between 11:00 p.m. and 2:00 West Beryl 6501 Carnelian St a.m. 4255 Tyler Ave EI Monte, CA 91731 16 Telephone: (626) 858-7188 Facsimile: (626) 858-2882 Toll Free: (866) 969-7188 Page 161 0ucsEca�rrr ABSOLUTE I A1s I n _.u._,u_. tale Li -PPO 16307 g Ats r� E. Additive/Alternate Bid Item 2: Park Restroom Night Lock -Up and Gate Closure — Various Locations (Includes Gate at Etiwanda Preserve) Provide park restroom night lock-up and gate closure at the parks listed in Table 2. AIS is to furnish, install and maintain electronic patrol tour verification devices at these locations. If there is significant group activity in the park, the restrooms/gates are to be left open and the activity noted in the log. No return trip to the park is required. All restrooms and gates are to be closed during the time intervals indicated in Table 2. Park Restroom Night Lock -Up and Gate Closure is not required on the following holidays: New Year's Eve, July 4th, Halloween, Thanksgiving Eve, Thanksgiving, Christmas Eve, and Christmas Day. All other holidays will be paid at regular daily rates. Daily reports from the tour verification system documenting the date/time of restroom/gate lockup and any exceptions are to be provided to the Parks Supervisor daily. Table 2 Park Name Address seven (7) days per week. Close restrooms between 11:00 p.m. and 2:00 Red Hill 7484 Vineyard Ave a.m. 8625 Madrone seven (7) days per week. Los Amigos Park Avenue Close restrooms between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 Bear Gulch 9094 Arrow Hwy a.m. seven (7) days per week. Notes: When emergency situations occur, contact the appropriate responder below for assistance: 1. 911 2. Tim Faulkner, Parks Maintenance Supervisor - 951.240.6791 3. On Call/Standby 909 773-2613 E. Additive/Alternate Bid Item 2: Park Restroom Night Lock -Up and Gate Closure — Various Locations (Includes Gate at Etiwanda Preserve) Provide park restroom night lock-up and gate closure at the parks listed in Table 2. AIS is to furnish, install and maintain electronic patrol tour verification devices at these locations. If there is significant group activity in the park, the restrooms/gates are to be left open and the activity noted in the log. No return trip to the park is required. All restrooms and gates are to be closed during the time intervals indicated in Table 2. Park Restroom Night Lock -Up and Gate Closure is not required on the following holidays: New Year's Eve, July 4th, Halloween, Thanksgiving Eve, Thanksgiving, Christmas Eve, and Christmas Day. All other holidays will be paid at regular daily rates. Daily reports from the tour verification system documenting the date/time of restroom/gate lockup and any exceptions are to be provided to the Parks Supervisor daily. Table 2 Park Name Address Notes Restroom lockup only at 10:00 pm every day. Do not Foothill Trailhead 8500 Foothill Blvd lock gates 8625 Madrone Close restrooms between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. Los Amigos Park Avenue seven (7) days per week. 4255 Tyler Ave EI Monte, CA 91731 17 Telephone: (626) 858-7188 Facsimile: (626) 858-2882 Toll Free: (866) 969-7188 Page 162 ABSOLUTE I A15--.1 g Ats r� . L . i. _i . J IJ Stale Li- PPO 16302 ` Church 10190 Church St Close restrooms between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. Golden Oak 9345 Golden Oak Rd seven (7) days per week. Hermosa 6787 Hermosa Ave Close restrooms between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. Old Town 10033 Feron Blvd seven (7) days per week. Church 10190 Church St Close restrooms between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. seven (7) days per week. Hermosa 6787 Hermosa Ave Close restrooms between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. seven (7) days per week. Ralph M. Lewis 7898 Elm St Close restrooms between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. seven (7) days per week. Spruce 7730 Spruce Ave Close restrooms between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. seven (7) days per week. West Greenway 7756 Meadowcrest Ct Close restrooms between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. seven (7) days per week. Coyote Canyon 10987 Terra Vista Close restrooms between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. Pkwy seven (7) days per week. Milliken 7699 Milliken Ave Close restrooms between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. seven (7) days per week. Mountain View 11701 Terra Vista Close restrooms between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. Pkwy seven (7) days per week. Garcia 13150 Garcia Drive Close restrooms between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. seven (7) days per week. Close restrooms and gate between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 Victoria Arbors 7429 Arbor Lane a.m. seven (7) days per week. Do not lock gates if vehicles are in parking lot Ellena 7139 Kenyon Way Close restrooms between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. seven (7) days per week. Kenyon 11481 Kenyon Way Close restrooms between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. seven (7) days per week. Victoria Groves 6840 Fairmont Close restrooms between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. seven (7) days per week. Vintage 11745 Victoria Park Close restrooms between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. Ln seven (7) days per week. Windrows 6849 Victoria Park Ln Close restrooms between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. seven (7) days per week. Day Creek 12350 Banyan St Close restrooms between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. seven (7) days per week. Close restrooms and gates, including east and west dog Etiwanda Creek 5939 East Ave park gates, between 11:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. seven (7) 4255 Tyler Ave EI Monte, CA 91731 18 Telephone: (626) 858-7188 Facsimile: (626) 858-2882 Toll Free: (866) 969-7188 Page 163 ABSOLUTE I A15--.1 g Ats r� .L'.._Ju:.lu.::JL_Ju_..u__L,_., u,... d'J _.J uJ''.J e.. a L.. L i.. stale Lic, PPO 14:02 4255 Tyler Ave EI Monte, CA 91731 19 Telephone: (626) 858-7188 Facsimile: (626) 858-2882 Toll Free: (866) 969-7188 Page 164 days per week. Drive down access road to insure no vehicles are present before locking gate. 13931 Youngs Close restrooms between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. Olive Grove Canyon seven (7) days per week. Rd Legacy 5858 Santa Ynez P1 Close restrooms between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. seven (7) days per week. Rancho Summit 5958 Soledad Way Close restrooms between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. seven (7) days per week. East Beryl 6524 Beryl St Close restrooms between 11:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. seven (7) days per week. Close restrooms park gate and equestrian center gate Heritage 5546 Beryl St between 11:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. seven (7) days per week. Do not lock gates if vehicles are in parking lot West Beryl 6501 Carnelian St Close restrooms between 11:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. seven (7) days per week. Red Hill 7484 Vineyard Ave Close restrooms between 11:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. seven (7) days per week. Bear Gulch 9094 Arrow Hwy Close restrooms between 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. seven (7) days per week. Lock gate between 9:00 p.m. and 11:00 p.m. seven days per week. Etiwanda Preserve 4890 Etiwanda Ave The gate is to remain unlocked and the San Bernardino County Sheriffs Department notified at (909) 941-1488 if vehicles are present. Notes: When emergency situations occur, contact the appropriate responder below for assistance: 1. 911 2. Tim Faulkner, Parks Maintenance Supervisor - 951.240.6791 3. On Call/Standby 909 773-2613 4255 Tyler Ave EI Monte, CA 91731 19 Telephone: (626) 858-7188 Facsimile: (626) 858-2882 Toll Free: (866) 969-7188 Page 164 ,0ucsua&rr _l�'`---' (D . ABSOLUTEATERNATIOML As_ fIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIfIIIIIIIIIIIII IVE �L _uU s ,�,., :rr� b,o��° F. Quality Assurance Plan We at Absolute International Security take pride in the fact that we hire, train, and deploy officers of the highest caliber and standards. Our hiring and vetting process includes an application screening, a panel interview, a report writing exercise, and a complete background investigation. To follow up with our rigorous hiring standards, we have created a Quality Assurance Plan that holds our company and employees accountable for in -field excellence. Staffing We will staff your location(s) with officers who have been highly trained in the specific details and scope of work at your site(s). This will ensure that the officers present are familiar with the specific post assignments, emergency protocol, expectations, and responsibilities that vary from site to site. Our Account Managers assigned to your site will also be briefed on the expectations of the officers that are specific to that site, in case they need to be deployed at a moment's notice. This ensures that even in the worst-case scenario, you will still have personnel that have site- specific training, regardless of any circumstance. For whatever reason, if an officer is unable to work, the replacement will also be trained in and have knowledge of all aspects of this specific post. Once on post, the replacement personnel will be just as knowledgeable and effective as the regularly scheduled officers. Customer Service and Communication Customer service and communications is a critical factor of any industry, but of the utmost importance in the security industry. We provide our own in-house, 24/7 Communications Dispatch Center. Our professionally trained Communications Officers communicate between clients and management, check in and out our officers, and maintain a computer-generated database of our scheduled security personnel. Our officers are required to call in, at minimum, four hours prior to the start of their shift if an issue arises where they will not be able to report on time. Once our Communications Dispatch Center has been notified of any emergency, they immediately follow protocol to notify any management necessary and dispatch any support or replacement personnel to ensure that your service is not interrupted in any way. Check in and Check Out System When a security officer begins his shift, he reports directly to the post and calls our Communications Dispatch Center to check in. The Communications Dispatch Center records the check-in and check-out times for every officer and every shift for all Absolute International Security clients. In addition to checking in and out on the phone, we also implement sign -in and sign -out sheets at each job site. The sign in sheets are collected by one of our field supervisors and are reviewed and documented at our offices. These sign -in sheets are compared with the call- in and call -out logs that our Communications Dispatch Center recorded for every officer. This data is also checked against the assigned post schedule requested by the client to ensure that the officer is following the authorized schedule and no incident of unnecessary overtime or lapse in service. If any discrepancies are noted, they are immediately addressed and resolved. All sign -in sheets and call-in and out logs will match the assigned schedule for every jobsite. Uniforms Absolute International Security provides its own custom uniform attire to fit the professional look that exemplifies our service. We offer a suit and tie uniform for job -sites where discrete service is necessary as well as a "harder" look uniform with BDU style tactical pants and 4255 Tyler Ave EI Monte, CA 91731 20 Telephone: (626) 858-7188 Facsimile: (626) 858-2882 Toll Free: (866) 969-7188 Page 165 ,0ucsua&rr MERNATIOML l�'�---�(D ABSOLUTE A S_ iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiIIIIIIillillillillillilliiii;dUL._ ,Sbtl[i PPOIM2 uniform shirt with company patches. Once hired, officers are issued, at minimum, three uniforms for the post that they are assigned to. We order our custom uniforms from a local uniform company, that provides same-day service and we also maintain an in-house stock of various styles, sizes, and colors. This guarantees that at any time, officers can be provided with a clean, new, neatly pressed uniform. Our Field Supervisors also keep a stock of uniforms in our patrol vehicles, if the need for an immediate replacement arises. Our turnaround time for a newly issued uniform is typically less than five hours. Appearance Our security officers are typically the contact point between our company and the outside world, so maintaining a professional image to represent our company is a key factor in excellent service. We expect our officers to maintain a clean, neatly pressed uniform that is free of stains, rips and/or tears. During the course of duty, we understand that issues may arise. When and if an officer is in need of a replacement, they are instructed to call our Communications Center and request that a new uniform be provided. We will obtain a new uniform for that officer and have it brought to the site within an hour, if the officer is on duty. Documentation and Equipment Absolute International Security officers are advised to arrive on post fifteen minutes prior to the beginning of their shift(s) and are required to call the Communications Dispatch Center upon arrival. During the shift, our Communications Officers will continuously monitor and check up on all officers on duty to ensure their status on site. Arriving early allows officers to prepare for the day's events and in some cases, be briefed with information from the previous officers during shift change. With every side, different post orders will require officers to perform different duties, all in a timely manner. A "Duty Flow Sheet' will provide specific details that must be accomplished throughout the shift, many of which could be time -sensitive. Once a duty is completed, it will be noted in the "Duty Flow Sheet" making sure to list the date, time, and location of the completed task. All company and client property are to be handled with complete care. Telephones, computers, tablets, Gate Access Controls, keys, radios etc. are logged in and out throughout the shift. Prior to starting a shift, it shall be the responsibility of the officer assigned to conduct an inventory assessment of any/all items issued and assigned. This assessment will include, but not be limited to, checking equipment for damage, recording serial numbers, and ensuring all equipment is accounted for. Equipment will be secured in a locked container that will be kept onsite. Security codes, Post Orders, and all required equipment will be kept secured at all times. Management Team Our Operations Management Team is comprised of an Director of Operations (1), Operations Manager (1), Quality Assurance Manager (1), and Account Managers (4). The Director of Operations, Operations Manager, and Quality Assurance Manager meet with all clients to ensure that their needs and expectations are satisfied. Account Managers are assigned to a geographic area and work with the officers to ensure quality of service and have proper training and knowledge of their responsibilities. 4255 Tyler Ave EI Monte, CA 91731 21 Telephone: (626) 858-7188 Facsimile: (626) 858-2882 Toll Free: (866) 969-7188 Page 166 ,0ucsua-Vrr _ (D . ABSOLUTEATERNATIOML A S_S �I ��I II+VIII ILII II III II�II�II�I I�I I�I �� NIJP;:UAL _ ,Stale l.ic uPP()16302 ` G. Staffing Plan City of Rancho Cucamonga POSITION/ TITLE (LIST EACH EMPLOYEE SEPARATELY) I HOURS PER DAY HOURS PER WEEK HOURS PER MONTH HOURS PER YEAR I SUN IMONI TUE I WED I THU I FRI I SAT Epicenter/Sports Complex - 8408 Rochester Ave. Officer 1: 8PM - 3AM = 7HRS Officer 2: 12PM - 6PM = 6HRS Officer 3: 7PM-3AM = 8HRS 7 7 7 7 7 35 152 1820 6 6 26 312 8 8 16 69 832 Subtotal Hours 57 247T 2964 Metrolink Station -11208 Azusa Court at Milliken Officer 2: 4AM - 10AM = 6HRS Officer 4: 10AM - 4PM = 6HRS Officer 5: 4PM - 11PM = 7HRS Officer 6: 6AM - 1PM = 7HRS Officer 4: 1PM - 8PM = 7HRS Officer 7: 8PM - 1AM - 5HRS Officer 6: 6AM - 11AM = 5HRS Officer 7: 1 1A - 4PM = 5HRS Officer 8: 4PM - 1030PM - 6.51 -IRS 6 6 6 6 6 30 130 1560 6 6 6 6 6 30 130 1560 7 7 7 7 7 35 152 1820 7 7 30 364 7 7 30 364 5 5 22 260 5 5 22 260 5 5 22 260 6.5 7 28 338 Subtotal Hours 1 1311 566 6786 Animal Care and Adoption Center -11780 Arrow Route Officer 9: 713M - 813M = 1HRS 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 7 30 365 Subtotal Hours 7 30 365 Park Restroom Night Lock-up and Gate Closure Officer 10: 1013M - 2AM = 4HRS 1 4 1 4 4 4 1 4 1 4 1 4 28 121 1456 Subtotal Hours 28 121 1456 Total Hours 11571 Notes: 1. The staffing plan is based on the schedule and addendum of the RFP# 17/18-009. 2. There will be approximately 10 security officers in total working these locations. 4255 Tyler Ave EI Monte, CA 91731 22 Telephone: (626) 858-7188 Facsimile: (626) 858-2882 Toll Free: (866) 969-7188 Page 167 ,0ucsua&rr _ (D . ABSOLUTEATERNATIOML wls_,� fIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIfIIIIIIIIIIIIIIV���_u�� �s��,�,.,�:rr�b,o� ���° H. Operations Chart and Service Procedures I Data Information Knowledge Collecting Providing Supporting POST/WORK ORDER Project Manager: Bryan Colindres Project Coordinator: Joe Leal SCHEDULE THREAT ASSESSMENT City Rancho TRAINING CENTER Instructor: Bryan ACTION ARRANGEMENT Colindres of CENTER TAKING Lead Scheduler: SandraLadage Head of Dispatch: Cucamonga OP Mgr.: Ronald Scheduler: Kristine Barrera CUSTOMER Frost IN-HOUSE THREAT ASSESSMENT TRAINING CENTER Instructor: Bryan QA: Bryan Colindres IN-HOUSE DISPATCH Colindres OP Mgr.: Ronald Frost CENTER Head of Dispatch: Andrew Angulo CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP MANAGEMENT Controllor: Lisa Phan RFP COORDINATOR KauXue Thao INVOICEIACCOUNTING Controllor: Lisa Phan Accounting Asst: Olivia Du SUPERVISION Supervisors: Raymond Serrano, Amir Guirguis, Ricardo Gomez, Joel Medina, Danny Jimenez Report System Q&A Officer: 4255 Tyler Ave EI Monte, CA 91731 23 Telephone: (626) 858-7188 Facsimile: (626) 858-2882 Toll Free: (866) 969-7188 Page 168 ,0ucsua&rr _l�'`---' (D . 711 ABSOLUTEATERNATIOML SE(UMTY As_ fIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIfIIIIIIIIIIIIIIVE �L _uU s ,�,., :rr� b,o° I. Training/Dispatch Center Because we have a State Licensed Training Facility and a State Licensed Trainer, we handle our own training in-house by running a full training facility at our corporate headquarters. Training will always be offered to our Officers to increase their security awareness and the quality of our service to our clients. Our Trainer also oversees that all our security officers possess an active and current guard card. 1. All training other than 832PC for all new hires: All Absolute International Security (AIS) officers' and new hires are required to have completed upon application with AIS state mandated and certified training with the Bureau of Security and Investigative Services (B.S.I.S.) regulations. 2. On the job training: All Absolute International Security employees working in a security officer capacity are provided with weekly in-service field and scenario -based training in any of the above stated topics as on the job continuing education, and before each officer is assigned to a jobsite they will receive training in conjunction with specific Post Order and/or Scope of Work for each individual site. The Post Order and/or Scope of Work will be mortified periodically. 3. Perishable skills training that is provided intermittently: Other than weekly on the job training in the previous mentioned topics, sensitive use of force perishable skills and topics such as: • Firearms Training and Certification (year-round training and re -certification) • Baton Training and Certification (year-round training and re -certification) • Chemical Agents (OC Pepper Spray) Training and Certification • Arrest Tactics • Self -Defense 4. Training provided to guards : • Sexual Harassment Training • Crime Prevention and Response • Dealing with Aggressive Behavior • Interpersonal Communication • Managing Conflict • Teamwork • BSIS Guard Card Training • Firearm Training • Terrorism Awareness Training • Crowd Control of Large Groups • Preventing Discrimination and Harassment • Workplace Safety Training • Ethical Conduct • Negotiation Skills • OSHA Training • Baton Training • Driver Safety Training 4255 Tyler Ave EI Monte, CA 91731 24 Telephone: (626) 858-7188 Facsimile: (626) 858-2882 Toll Free: (866) 969-7188 Page 169 �cs�c�_�'- uABSOLUTEATERNATIOML SE(UMTY Als_0� RM • Legal Powers and Limitations of • Observation and Documentation Security Officers Training • General Patrol Methods • Crisis Response 0—R31 AIS launched our new Training Sector in April 2010, offering training classes to in-house guards as well as for all those who are considering a career in security service. The training sector has the following responsibilities: • Responsible for all aspects of corporate training policies, objectives, and initiatives. Directs the design, planning, and implementation of corporate training programs and procedures. Plans and directs new training techniques and suggests enhancements to existing training programs. Ensures that the training programs meet federal, state, and local regulations. Measures the impact of programs and learning activities. • Responsible for the overall satisfaction of customers. Plans and directs all aspects of training sector's staff and service functions. Develops and oversees training sector's staff and service policies, objectives and initiatives. Demonstrates expertise in a variety of the field's concepts, practices, and procedures. • Plans and directs all aspects of training sector's business development policies, objectives, and initiatives. Responsible for developing new market initiatives, assessing new markets, and analyzing business opportunities. Conducts financial feasibility studies and develops proposals for new business opportunities. • Plans and directs all aspects of training sector's policies and initiatives regarding its advertising strategy. Responsible for directing the conception and placement of all advertisements, developing, and implementing effective advertising campaigns, and ensuring all advertising efforts work toward the training sector's overall goals and objectives. • Oversees all aspects of training sector's budgeting function. Responsible for coordinating 4255 Tyler Ave EI Monte, CA 91731 25 Telephone: (626) 858-7188 Facsimile: (626) 858-2882 Toll Free: (866) 969-7188 Page 170 ,0u u�ABSOLUTE_`�1 ws,�+ IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIB���_u�.RM budgeting procedures for collecting and analyzing an annual budget plan. Evaluates training sector's actual performance to set budget. • Familiar with a variety of the field's concepts, practices, and procedures. Relies on extensive experience and judgment to plan and accomplish goals. Performs a variety of tasks. Leads and directs the work of others. A wide degree of creativity and latitude is expected. Our company's certified licensed trainer is responsible for our growing training facility at our corporate offices. Mr. Bryan Colindres, our coordinator for Training and Compliance has approximately 20 years of security experience. He has worked many years in the military and has security experiences including in various school districts in the Southern California area. He has obtained regular guard training as well as firearm training instructor licenses. Mr. Bryan Colindres oversees AIS's training functions and ensures that the company is in compliance with California State Law and BSIS Regulations. -7 V - _ J We are currently offering training classes on the following subjects: 1. Power to Arrest (Module A — D) 2. Exposed Firearms Permit 3. Guard Card 4. Loss Prevention 5. Arrest & Control Techniques 6. De -Escalation of Force 7. Tear Gas & Pepper Spray 8. Exposed Firearms Permit 9. Taser Certification of Force 4255 Tyler Ave EI Monte, CA 91731 26 Telephone: (626) 858-7188 Facsimile: (626) 858-2882 Toll Free: (866) 969-7188 Page 171 ,0ucsua&rr MERNATIOML l�'`--'(D . ABSOLUTE A1S_a!� IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIV��L:LLL RM 10. 16302 10. C-TPAT Inspection Compliance Training 11. Security & Safety Training 12. CAL -OSHA Regulation 13. Professional Security Consultation 14. CPR & First Aid 15. Emergency Onsite Training Dispatch Center AIS has established our own 24/7 in-house Dispatch Center and currently have 6 staff members working in this department. We are in pending to apply for the FCC license to get better coverage for our communication system. The goal of our Dispatch Center is to support our guards, so they can meet every expectation expected by our clients. The functions of Dispatch Center include the following: • Answering phone calls after office hours • Tracking all guard activity via check-in/check-out • Enhancing the connection between our supervisors and clients • Relaying any issues our guards encounter to management • Communicating with our field supervisors for quicker response times in the event of emergencies. • Responding to last minute call offs and client's request for emergency coverage by rescheduling different guards as backup. 4255 Tyler Ave EI Monte, CA 91731 27 Telephone: (626) 858-7188 Facsimile: (626) 858-2882 Toll Free: (866) 969-7188 Page 172 ,0ucsua&rr _l�'`---' (D . 711 ABSOLUTEATERNATIOML SE(UMTY As_ fIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIfIIIIIIIIIIIIIIVE �L _uU s ,.,., :rr� b,o° J. Emergency Response Plan All Security Officers shall clearly understand the following procedures. Each Security Officer must use good common sense and follow through with a clear mind and complete respect for personal safety. The lives of our officers as well as the lives of others are of the highest priority. Officers must also keep in mind that while on -duty, personal injury is as important as the injury of others. Officers must firstly protect themselves to be able to protect others in the case of an emergency. TYPES OF EMERGENCIES: 1. Man Made 2. Natural • Fires • Accident/Injuries (Train, Bus, or Car) • Bomb Threats • Blackouts • Terror Activities • Robberies (Armed) • Riots, etc. • Earthquakes • Storms • Floods, etc. PRIORITY CALLS: 1. Fire Department and/or Police Department 2. Area Field Supervisor or Account Manager "Always use good common sense in making decisions. 4255 Tyler Ave EI Monte, CA 91731 28 Telephone: (626) 858-7188 Facsimile: (626) 858-2882 Toll Free: (866) 969-7188 Page 173 ,0ucsua-Vrr _ (D . ABSOLUTEATERNATIOML wls_,� fIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIfIIIIIIIIIIIIIIV���_u�� �s��,�,.,�:rr�b,o� ���° FIRE EMERGENCY REPORT SYSTEM If any fire is detected in any location on the jobsite, the first thing to do is summon the local Fire Department. Officers must be prepared to provide the exact address of the location. Then, officers must immediately notify their Supervisor as well as the Client. Fire Emergency Identify What Class of Fire- A, B, or C Use of Fire Extinguisher if the fire is small & contained Do not attempt to fight any fire that is large and obviously out -of -control Never cut off your escape route to safety Z' Your next top priority must be the protection of lives. Activate or sound the fire alarm. Then coordinate an evacuation with the proper authorities. ,a Call 911 Call the Fire Department Z' Notify Field Supervisor ,a Field Supervisor Will Notify AIS Project Manager Mr. Bryan Colindres, Project Manager Tel: (626) 858-7188 And AIS Will Notify the Client _a 4255 Tyler Ave EI Monte, CA 91731 29 Telephone: (626) 858-7188 Facsimile: (626) 858-2882 Toll Free: (866) 969-7188 Page 174 ,0ucsua-Vrr _ (D . ABSOLUTEATERNATIOML wls_,� fIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIfIIIIIIIIIIIIIIV���_u�� �s��,�,.,�:rr�b,o� ���° n Wait for the Fire Department Check that the Fire Department has quick and easy access to the location of the fire. Unlock and open gates and doors. n Do not permit patrons to depart in vehicles Clear all access routes for emergency vehicles and equipment. Position yourself beside the street where you can easily be seen Direct the Fire Department to the affected area. Avoid having people walking or running around on the external perimeters of the location Once the Fire Department has arrived, the Captain/Chief will be in charge Control emergency access routes clear by keeping all unauthorized persons away from the emergency area 4255 Tyler Ave EI Monte, CA 91731 30 Telephone: (626) 858-7188 Facsimile: (626) 858-2882 Toll Free: (866) 969-7188 Page 175 ,0ucsua-Vrr _ (D . ABSOLUTEATERNATIOML wls_,� fIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIfIIIIIIIIIIIIIIV���_u�� �s��,�,.,�:rr�b,o� ���° ROBBERY REPORT SYSTEM Never Resist Z11 When Safe, Call 911 —0— Notify Field Supervisor —0— Field Supervisor Will Notify AIS Project Manager Mr. Bryan Colindres, Project Manager Tel: (626) 858-7188 AIS Will Notify the Client —0— Remember what the robber looks like & provide the best description possible Don't touch anything until Police arrive ,a Wait for Further Instructions from the Police Department 4255 Tyler Ave EI Monte, CA 91731 31 Telephone: (626) 858-7188 Facsimile: (626) 858-2882 Toll Free: (866) 969-7188 Page 176 �ucs�ca�rrr TI TYABSOLUTEATE� O L SLCUM IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII EE L K. Hiring and Background Check Procedures Our Officers are our most important asset, they represent AIS and you, the client. Therefore, AIS management considers many different components when hiring a security guard. We will only recruit applicants who we deem worthy of wearing our badge and uniform. We seek to hire personnel that not only have experience, but they must "fit the peg". Our commitment to recruiting and hiring quality officers ensures that we retain a professional team to minimalize turnover for you, our client. Applicant's Initial Hiring Process will include the following: • We recruit applicants through several resources- advertising through local newspapers and our website, job fairs, and government agencies. The majority of our New Hires, however, come from word of mouth, recommended from our current staff. We give special attention to former Police Officers and Military Veterans in particular because they have already established the disciplined qualities we are seeking. Many of our officers are veterans who were introduced to us through Work Source, a job placement agency for veterans. In addition, we have hired officers from EDD, L.A. County Department of Education, L.A. Puente Adult School, and several more. • Diversity is an asset we look for in an Officer. We look for professional personnel that can bring more to the table, especially here in Southern California where we are known to be a diverse state. Bi/Multi-Lingual Officers are a great advantage when working with the public. Our current staff speaks several languages: English, Spanish, Cantonese, Chinese, Mandarin, and Vietnamese as well as many others. • Application Process. Each applicant is required to fill out our detailed application AIS corporate offices to confirm that the candidate has the ability to communicate, read instructions, and most importantly, write legibly and intelligibly. Legible handwriting comes in handy when trying to read an Officer's detailed report of an important incident. • Certification & Training Requirements. New Recruits must have a valid guard card issued by the State of California Consumer Affairs and the Bureau of Security & Investigative Services (BSIS). We confirm this by checking the current status of the candidates' guard card number thru our contacts at BSIS and their website. We request copies of any and all certifications they may have obtained to confirm that the guard cards are up to date. Officers must also possess the PR -24 baton card to carry a baton. Additionally, First Aid or EMT -I certification, a Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) card, and a valid California Driver's License are required. • Physical Abilities. Even though we are an equal opportunity employer, most posts require a certain baseline of physical abilities that require us to take into account past injuries or current disabilities to provide you with the best service we can provide. This would be limited if our officers were not able to stand at a post for periods of time or walk around at a service location. • Contact References. AIS management will also review and contact the applicant's job 4255 Tyler Ave EI Monte, CA 91731 32 Telephone: (626) 858-7188 Facsimile: (626) 858-2882 Toll Free: (866) 969-7188 Page 177 ,0ucsua&rr _l�'`---' 711 ABSOLUTEATEMATIOML SE(UMTY Stale [A :uPP0 1630 references to ensure the character being presented on paper matches the candidate's actual in -field work quality or experience. Sometimes, the applicants will embellish their descriptions of actual work performed. We want to be reassured beforehand so that we do not make somebody else's old problem our new problem. Work Abilities & Experience. We also look for past experiences in similar types of environments. By doing so, we ensure that the applicant will have some knowledge of the work they will be required to perform. For example, in filling posts for the Pasadena City Hall, we would prefer an experienced, professional individual with the physical abilities to move swiftly, lift up to 50 lbs, and respond to the needs of the staff and visitors. Background Check or Verification. All personnel hired by AIS is screened through Megan's Law sex offender registry and verified to have a clean record, free from any criminal activity. If a client requires further investigation before an Officer is considered to serve at a particular location, we utilize HireRight to conduct a more in depth investigative background check. • Picture Identification. All Officers will be photographed and issued a picture identification card, which they will carry at all times. This identification card is to be properly displayed while on duty. It is typically worn on the lapel of the uniform shirt or clipped onto the front pocket for clear identification. • Drug Testing. Upon request from the client, AIS will have officers complete and pass a drug screening, a finger printing process, and a medical examination to determine fitness to perform assigned duties • Zero Tolerance. All officers are required to be up to date with any Local or State mandated requirements. If made aware, we will promptly notify our Officers when they need to take care of any issues. If an Officer refuses to adhere to the request, he will be replaced from the location immediately until he has fulfilled the requirements. AIS recruits officers through the efforts of Local Work Source Agencies as well as online advertisements and word of mouth. All applicants have to complete an application package that AIS Human Resources Department provides. If qualified, the applicant is then interviewed by the Operations supervisor. If the applicant passes the interview process, our HR department will then have the applicant fill out a questionnaire to process a background check. The HR department will also conduct Social Security screening, BSIS certification, and e -verification if needed. L. Orientation Program Every applicant who passes AIS's screening selection process must complete our mandatory orientation and training programs regardless of past experiences or guard licensing statuses. Our Orientation informs our officers of the general guidelines and duties required by most clients. This is followed by the given state mandated training subjects. 4255 Tyler Ave EI Monte, CA 91731 33 Telephone: (626) 858-7188 Facsimile: (626) 858-2882 Toll Free: (866) 969-7188 Page 178 'OucsEcakrr _l�' ABSOLUTEATERNATIOML�---� -.1 ,A fIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIfIIIIIIIIIIIIIIV��� s ,,, rr� �o,° • Employment Policies and Standard Practices for Security Officers Including, but not limited to benefits, workdays, pay rates, common hazards, job-related injuries, personal appearance, and disciplinary actions. • Job of a (PSO) Professional Security Officer/Private Safety Officer Including training in state registration requirements, the chain of command, attendance, prohibited weapons, scheduling, punctuality, and inappropriate actions and behavior. Employee Retention and Benefits AIS is an Equal Opportunity company that treats all employees equally. We have a commitment to our clients as well as our employees. AIS has never requested an early release and has never been removed from a security guard contract. We provide our best quality service to establish good business relationships with our current and potential clients. AIS currently covers 40 security contracts and has several pending as well. 1. Employment Retention: AIS has a six (6) month probationary period for all officers. The majority of AIS's employees are all formal employees, but some are hired as contract event officers. Regardless of their origin, our Operations Department usually conducts a "wish list" for our new employees. We try to keep each and every officer as close to home as possible to minimalize gasoline cost. Each officer is asked to list what shift they prefer to work and we provide available positions and job descriptions to check with the officer's preference. We believe that if a security officer enjoys the position they are assigned to, it reduces the number of call -offs and tardiness. • AIS has a low turnover rate 2. Employment Benefits: AIS wants our staff to fully enjoy employment at the company. In order to do that, AIS provides various benefits to both full-time and part-time employees as follows: • Health Insurance, Dental, and Vision • Employee Bonus Program • Paid Sick Pay • Paid Personal Days • Social Security Benefit • State Disability Insurance • Unemployment Insurance and Workers Compensation Insurance We also offer affordable coverage to all full time equivalent employees. Social Security Benefits refers to the amount of deduction from wages for Social Security Tax towards your Social Security benefits account. State Disability Insurance is to protect employees who miss work due to non -work related accidents or illnesses. Unemployment Insurance is intended to ensure a supplemental income should the employee lose his job through no fault of his own. Workers Compensation Insurance is intended to provide 4255 Tyler Ave EI Monte, CA 91731 34 Telephone: (626) 858-7188 Facsimile: (626) 858-2882 Toll Free: (866) 969-7188 Page 179 ,0ucsua-Vrr MERNATITY�'---�ABSOLUTEOM L SLCUM x s_ IIIiIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIV���_u� Sbt, i- PPO 163n2 medical care and is a partial supplement to income, under certain circumstances, for lost time resulting from injuries on the job or illnesses caused by work. Meal Break Compliance for Employees: AIS complies with the California law that mandates you must take a 30 -minute meal break, when you work more than 5 hours a day. You MUST begin your meal break BEFORE you start working more than 5 hours. For example, if you begin work at 6:00am, your meal break must begin no later than 11:OOam (5 hours after you begin work). AIS also complies with California law that mandates you take a 10 -minute, duty free, rest break for every four (4) hours worked or major fraction thereof. The law requires that you take a 10 - minute rest break in the middle of each 4 -hour work period (e.g., at the 2 -hour mark). 4255 Tyler Ave EI Monte, CA 91731 35 Telephone: (626) 858-7188 Facsimile: (626) 858-2882 Toll Free: (866) 969-7188 Page 180 ,0ucsua-Vrr (D . ABSOLUTEATERNATIOML SE(UMTY_l�'`---' As_ fIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIfIIIIIIIIIIIIIIVE �L _uU s ,�,., :rr� b,o° M. Financial Stability Statement *** Please be advised, the information disclosed on this page is confidential. We are entrusting City of Rancho Cucamonga to handle said information appropriately. • Absolute Security International, Inc. is registered as DUNS # 828041868 • AIS currently has an influx of working capital in hand. • AIS has a bond ability of up to $3 million. • AIS has a 2018 Experience Modification Rate (EMR) of 0.63 (63%) • A+ comprehensive sufficient insurance coverage and Crime/Terrorist insurance coverage • Absolute Security International, Inc. has increased its sales revenue by over 150% solid despite recent economic conditions. • Sufficient credit line has been granted by Bank of the West • Toyota Motor Credit has extended line of credit in case additional vehicles are needed. • On June 2010, AIS invested in developing our own training facility and was approved as a Weapons Training Center by the California Department of Consumer Affairs, BSIS. AIS provided serious investments to maintain all necessary tools, weapons, and training programs needed to function and successfully achieve our goals. • Own a 24/7 Dispatch/Communication Center • Absolute Security International, Inc. hereby declares that the company has no record of bankruptcy, current/pending litigation, claims or settlements that needed to be paid, planned office closures, impending merger, etc.... that may impede the firm's ability to provide its proposed solution or ongoing maintenance or support of its products and services. AIS hereby declares that it has never been default of contracted scope of services or terminated from contract prior to the end of the contract term, within the past 9 years. Executed this 12th day of April, 2018 at El Monte, CA . Lucy J. Lin, President & QM 4255 Tyler Ave EI Monte, CA 91731 36 Telephone: (626) 858-7188 Facsimile: (626) 858-2882 Toll Free: (866) 969-7188 Page 181 ,0ucsua-V7r (D . ABSOLUTEATERNATIOML SE(UMTY_l�'`---' As_ fIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIfIIIIIIIIIIIIIIVE �L _uU s ,�,., :rr� b,o° N. Summary of Insurances Absolute International Security Inc. maintains a comprehensive, specific insurance program for its various public and private security contracts. This coverage includes Commercial General Liability, Commercial Auto, Workers Compensation, Employer Liability and Terrorism Protection Plan. Commercial General Liability: ■ $1,000,000 for bodily injury and property damage on an "occurrence" basis. ■ $2,000,000 for general aggregate ■ Includes Completed Operations, Professional Liability (i.e., errors & omissions), theft extension, and lost key coverage. ■ Personal and advertising injury of any one person or organization; ■ Includes consequential bodily injury arising out of false arrest, malicious prosecution, slander and libel, and violation of right of privacy. ■ Product/Completed Agg. ■ Fire Damage ■ Medical Expense Umbrella Liability: ■ Each accident limit: $5,000,000 and up ■ Disease Policy Limit: $5,000,000 and up ■ Disease Each Employee: $5,000,000 and up Terrorism Crime ■ Foreign Terrorism Protection Plan ■ Employee Dishonesty Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability: ■ Each accident Limit: $1,000,000 ■ Disease Policy Limit: $1,000,000 ■ Each Occurrence: $1,000,000 Endorsements ■ Error and Omissions ■ Assault and Battery ■ Lost Keys Commercial Auto Liability: ■ Liability: $1,000,000 4255 Tyler Ave EI Monte, CA 91731 37 Telephone: (626) 858-7188 Facsimile: (626) 858-2882 Toll Free: (866) 969-7188 Page 182 ,0ucslca-lr7r _l�'`---' (D . ABSOLUTEATERNATIOML w�s_,� fIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIfIIIIIIIIIIIIIIV���_u�� �s��,�,.,�:rr�b,o� ���° o Comprehensive o Collision ■ Hired Auto: $1,000,000 o Comprehensive o Collision ■ Non -Owned Auto: $1,000,000 Excess Insurance: For clients that require an extra level of insurance due to high risk, we can procure a per project "excess" policy that is in addition to the coverage of an underlying policy category (i.e. general liability, auto, crime). AIS will also provide updates on our insurance coverage throughout the term of the Contract to ensure that there is no break in coverage during the period of the Contract. We will provide a thirty (30) day written notice prior to the cancellation or changes of any insurance policy. G PARKER INSURANCE GROUP November 28, 2017 Re: Absolute Security International Inc To Whom It May Concern: The 2018 Experience Modification Rate for Absolute Security International Inc is 63%. Regards, Catherine Bander Vice President—Southern California Region JAMES G. PARKER I NSURANCE ASSOC€ATES 1753 E. FfxAvcNUL. FiktsNo. CA 93729 • P.O. 3oX 3947. FMsNo, CA 93650-M AIN OFFICE (559) 222-7722. FAX 559>222-1724- LiCfnsE #0554959 WWW_iGPARKFP_COM 4255 Tyler Ave EI Monte, CA 91731 38 Telephone: (626) 858-7188 Facsimile: (626) 858-2882 Toll Free: (866) 969-7188 Page 183 DATE (MWDD/YYYY) CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE 1/18/2018 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(P), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder Is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(les) must be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not c4,nfer rights to the certificate holder In lieu of such endorsement(s). PRODUCER CONTACT 1CriSt1 Parkin James G Parker Insurance Associates PHONE KtL-(559)222-7722 FAAXIAIC No: (559)222-1726 License #0554959 E-MAIL : Park kin@' arker.com ADDRESS�9p P 0 Box 3947 INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC0 Fresno CA 93650 INSURERAEvereSt Indemnity Insurance Co 10851 INSURED INSURER B Everest National Insurance Co 10120 Absolute Security International Inc INSURER C: dba: Absolute International Security INSURER D: 4255 Tyler Ave INSURER E El Monte CA 91731 INSURER F COVFROnFS CERTIFICATE NUMBER:18-19 GL BA IIB WC 17-18CR REVISION NUMBER: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TD ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. INSR TYPE OF INSURANCE ADDrL SUBR POLICY N MBER POLICY EFF POLICY EXP LIMITS LTR A X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CLAIMS -MADE FR OCCUR EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1,000,000 A AGE To PREMISES EaENTED occurrenc E 50,000 ME D EXP (Any one person) E 5,000 _ Deductible: $1,000 51GL007107181 1/27/2018 1/27/2019 PERSONALBADVINJURY $ 1,000,000 Abuse 6 Molestation GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: GENERAL AGGREGATE $ 2,000,000 X POLICY E PRO - LOC PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG $ 2,000,000 Errors & Omissions $ 1,000,000 OTHER: AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY ' uIBINEI _NGL LIMIT S 1,000,000 Ea accident BODILY INJURY (Per person) $ B X ANY AUTO ALL OWNED [ SCHEDULED AUTOS AUTOS 51CA000408171 5/31/2017 5/31/2018 BODILY INJURY (Per accident) $ PROPERTY DAMAGE Per accident)$ HIREDAUTOS [ NON -OWNED AUTOS Is L X UMBRELLA LAB OCCUR EACH OCCURRENCE Is 5,000 000 AGGREGATE Is 5,000,000 A EXCESS LIAB CLAIMS -MADE $ DED X RETENTIONS 10,000 51CC0025611811/27/2018 1/27/2019 B _ WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY YIN ANY PROPRIETORIPARTNERIEXECUTIVE ❑NIA OFFICERIMEMBER EXCLUDED? (Mandatory In NH) 5300003032181 1/27/2018 1/27/2019 PER OTH- X STATUTE ER E.L. EACH ACCIDENT $ 1,000,000 E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYE $ 1,000,000 If yS , describe under DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT $ 1,000,000 B Employee Dishonesty 51ML000373171 8/26/2017 8/26/2018 Limit [ $500,000 Deductible $10,000 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS I LOCATIONS I VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached If more space Is required) *The Umbrella coverage blankets the General Liability, Automobile Liability, and Workers Compensation coverage. l91 a Z41 Ila P)1\t ME Lull 01■la. FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL �E DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICYPROVI SIONS. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE J Parker III/KRIPAR ©1988-2014 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. ACORD 25 (2014/01) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD 39 INS025 i7mann Page 184 ,0ucsEcaVrr MERNATITY�,��riABSOLUTEO L SLCUM aP�,M�b�. IIIIIIIIV��L_u�L, sr����� rroieana AIS hereby states we will NOT be using any subcontractors for Security Guard Services at City of Rancho Cucamonga. 4255 Tyler Ave EI Monte, CA 91731 40 Telephone: (626) 858-7188 Facsimile: (626) 858-2882 Toll Free: (866) 969-7188 Page 185 �ucsEca�rrr _ ABSOLUTEATERMT10ML A ff f flff��If��ll��fffIIIIIIIfIIIIIIIIIIIIIfVE�L �s��,.,,� rr� bb Management Team Experience • President and Qualified Manager, Ms. Lucy Lin graduated from the Executive Masters of Business Administration program at Claremont College. She has close to 27 years of experience working with a private security firm. She specializes in working with government contracts and cost effective custom security programs. Ms. Lin is a certified mediator by the City of Los Angeles, City Attorney's Office and has vast experience in resolving difficult business disputes. All major, ultimate decisions regarding AIS are handled and approved by Ms. Lin. Her experiences include Human Resources and Administrative Management, Marketing Development, Operations System Control, and Staffing and Accounts coordination. She is well liked by all her employees and customers because she is an honest and caring individual who always makes herself available to listen to any concerns her staff may have. She has an open-door policy and always sheds a positive light on any issue that crosses her table. E-mail: Ilin@absolutesecurityintl.com Telephone: (626) 858-7188, Ext. 108 Fax: (626) 858-2882 Availability: Monday -Friday 9:OOAM-6:OOPM • Legal General Counsel for Absolute International Security, Mr. Mitchell F. Ducey, Esq. Mr. Ducey has over 20 years of experience with focuses on business, civil and appellate litigation, insurance defense, and insurance coverage. As an Attorney, he has successfully represented corporations and individuals in their business and personal legal matters. As our Legal Counsel, Mr. Ducey ensures that we are always in compliance with Federal, State, and Local requirements and is experienced in dealing with all types of legal issues involving contracts, corporate matters, government filing requirements, and employment. Mr. Ducey makes himself available should anyone on staff have any legal concerns or need documents approved, including company Policies and Procedures. All contracts would be reviewed then approved by Mr. Ducey, if necessary. • Chief of Staff, Mr. Juventino "J" Gomez is a disabled American Veteran who served in the United States Army and has been an activist for Veterans for many years. Mr. Gomez also has extensive experience with the County Department of Human Resources for over 25 years, served for 12 years as Senior Deputy to the Los Angeles County Supervisor, and currently holds the position as Councilman for the City of El Monte for the past 8 years. Mr. Gomez advises our top management team about issues and challenges within our company and ways on how to resolve them. He provides his expertise on various subjects and allows AIS to gain a new perspective on numerous objectives. E-mail: jgomez@absolutesecurityintl.com Telephone: (626) 858-7188, Ext. 104 Fax: (626) 858-2882 Availability: Monday -Friday 9:OOAM-6:OOPM 4255 Tyler Ave EI Monte, CA 91731 41 Telephone: (626) 858-7188 Facsimile: (626) 858-2882 Toll Free: (866) 969-7188 Page 186 ,0ucsEca.Vrr ABSOLUTEnTERNATIOML_SE(UMTY A1S_ IIIII III IIIIIIIIIII IIIIIII�IIIIII�IIIIIII III II�F�L _ Sbtl [ -4Pn 16302 • Director of Operations, Mr. Joe Leal is at the helm of the Operations Department at AIS. He has over 23 years of combined Military, Federal Service, and Corporate Security Management with an emphasis on training, recruiting, and customer service. Mr. Leal holds significant positions such as Commissioner for Veterans, Los Angeles County, 1St District and Assistant Director, and Army Reserve Employer Support of the Guard and Reserve (ESGR). He has managed staff levels of all sizes and brings an increased level of leadership to the team. He oversees the Operations Department, but also contributes to a variety of additional support functions including Human Resources, Marketing/Branding, Recruiting, Risk Management, Business Development, and Logistics. Mr. Leal has also established National, State and County Veteran collaborative programs through outreach and engagement with the community. He was awarded the "Call to Service" award by President Obama. E-mail: jleal@absolutesecurityintl.com Telephone: (626) 858-7188, Ext. 120 Fax: (626) 858-2882 Availability: Monday -Friday 9:OOAM-6:OOPM • Quality Assurance/Certified Training Manager, Mr. Bryan Colindres is responsible for the development and management of AIS's Training Center and criminal justice/law enforcement background checking of employees. He has been employed by agencies like the Orange Unified School District in the city of Orange as a Criminal Justice Instructor, the Los Angeles World Airports Police Department, and the Los Angeles Police Department for patrol and training. In those departments he was rewarded the position of an FTO (Field Training Officer). His training and experience extends to a vast majority of P.O.S.T. Certify Courses in Law Enforcement. He has acquired the basic P.O.S.T. certificate from the Commission of Peace Officer Standards and Training with the Department of Justice. During his 6 -year tour in the United States Army, he was deployed in support of Operation Enduring Freedom as a 19 Delta Cavalry Scout (Reconnaissance) with a rank of Sergeant. He also holds extensive military training and experience. E-mail: bcolindres@absolutesecurityintl.com Telephone: (626) 858-7188, Ext. 106 Fax: (626) 858-2882 Availability: 24 hours a day, 7 days a week • Operations Manager, Mr. Ronald Frost is a critical component of our Operations Department. In 1988, Mr. Frost earned his Bachelor's Degree in Criminal Justice at Cal State University. His 20 years of experience in Logistics as a Broker/Break Bulk Supervisor allowed him to work closely with the U.S. Customs and prestigious clients such as Osh Kosh, Levi Straus, Nike, Magellan and Louis Vuitton. His many years in Logistics has earned him vast experience through managing personnel responsible for importing products from all over the world. He personally handles daytime Field Supervision as well as the Ultimate Personnel Schedule. He ensures all posts are filled and clients are never left unsatisfied. Mr. Frost makes certain any issues pertaining to customer service are addressed and personally interviews all incoming personnel. 4255 Tyler Ave EI Monte, CA 91731 42 Telephone: (626) 858-7188 Facsimile: (626) 858-2882 Toll Free: (866) 969-7188 Page 187 ,0ucsua&rr MERNATITY�'---�(D . ABSOLUTEOML SLCUM A S_3f ����I II+VIII II II III III III III II�II�I I�I �i�L� _J�'i.._ ,Sta tel.ic :u......2 u E-mail: rfrost@absolutesecurityintl.com Telephone: (626) 858-7188, Ext. 103 Fax: (626) 858-2882 Availability: 24 hours a day, 7 days a week Director of Human Resources, Mrs. Val Martinez is responsible for the entirety of overall administration within AIS including, but not limited to Human Resources, general services as well as Logistic Services. She has over 25 years of experiences handling HR, management, and accounting responsibilities for the private sector. Her charismatic personality brings the company a more family orientated working environment. Her long tenure in HR make AIS's administration more organized and professional. E-mail: vmartinez@absolutesecurityintl.com Telephone: (626) 858-7188, Ext. 112 Fax: (626) 858-2882 Availability: Monday -Friday 9:OOAM-6:OOPM Controller, Mrs. Lisa Phan attended Cal Poly Pomona and Majored in Business Administration. She worked at ERS Security for 9 years before joining the AIS team. She oversees the accounting department, including the design of an organizational structure adequate for achieving the department's goals and objectives. She handles all periodic financial reports, bank reconciliations, corporate annual reports, and controls all cash flow for the company. She is also the Accounts Receivable and partial Accounts Payable that makes her the "gate keeper" of our company. E-mail: 1phan@absolutesecurityintl.com Telephone: (626) 858-7188, Ext. 109 Fax: (626) 858-2882 Availability: Monday -Friday 9:OOAM-6:OOPM Finance Manager, Mr. Daniel Nonaka possesses a Masters degree in Finance and a Bachelors Degree of Sciences in Accounting. He has over 24 years of experience working for international and local companies such as PriceWaterhouseCoopers, Danisco, and Northrop Grumman. He has vast experience in auditing, accounting, finances, and providing financial and analytical information, including detailed analysis of company performance and financial reports, necessary for internal strategic planning and actions such as budgeting. He is responsible for overseeing accounting procedures, the analysis of Company financial positions, and all internal and external audits. E-mail: dnonaka@absolutesecurityintl.com Telephone: (626) 858-7188, Ext. 102 Fax: (626) 858-2882 Availability: Monday -Friday 9:OOAM-6:OOPM 4255 Tyler Ave EI Monte, CA 91731 43 Telephone: (626) 858-7188 Facsimile: (626) 858-2882 Toll Free: (866) 969-7188 Page 188 W4 U_ x to x w aO CIO O¢ Q I v o� u N U O 4-. .. d ° y z x to x w aO o� O¢ I ca o� u N O 4-. d ° y v C�.7 aU 1 O z 0 on r a� a� cn w � � o� y ca o� u N O 4-. ° ° y v C�.7 aU O,° ¢•,� a a zcn ° W U o� o Q � a V] Q W 7 cn w � � o� y ca o� u N O 4-. ° ° y v C�.7 aU O,° ¢•,� a a W cu ° W U cn w � � o� y ca o� a ° y v o a ua cn w � � U y U o� a cn w � � y U cn � � y 44 Page 189 L UCY I LIN 4255 Tyler Ave El Monte, CA 91731 Telephone: (626) 858-7188 Email: Ilin@absolutesecurityintl.com PERSONAL QUALIFICATIONS: Offers more than twenty-five (25) years in executive management experiences with a comprehensive background in HR & Administrative management; Marketing Development; Government Contracting; Operations System control in the private patrol sector, as well as executive management related to HR, administration, marketing, operations, and legal issues including collections, mediation, conciliations. • Expert in Executive management & Business Administration • Extensive Experience in Finances, Marketing, and Operations • City of Los Angeles Attorney's office certified Mediator With experiences in • Strategic Planning in Mergers and Acquisitions • International Business Negotiations (China & US) PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCES: Absolute Security International Inc. (2009 -Present Private Security Services Provider • Founder, Owner, President, QM • Administrative Duties including but not limited to oversight in, development of, and management of the Marketing, Operations, Finances, HR, and Legal departments • Government and large corporate contracts (upwards of $5M) • Contracts with LADOT, LADWP, General Consulate of the People's Republic of China, City of Monrovia, City of Covina Metrolink, City of Santa Monica BBB, numerous unified school districts Odona Central Security, I�1990-20082 Private Security Services Provider • Chief Administrative Officer, QM, Partner • Administrative Duties including but not limited to oversight in, development of, and management of the Marketing, Operations, Finances, HR, and Legal departments • Rescued and rebuilt the company from bankruptcy to a net worth of $SM over a period of 19 years EDUCATION' Executive Master of Business Administration (EMBA) Peter F. Drucker Graduate School of Management, Claremont Graduate University (Jan. 2005) Claremont, CA Certificate in Leadership Peter F. Drucker Graduate School of Management, Claremont Graduate University (2005) Claremont, CA 45 Page 190 Certificate in Strategy Peter F. Drucker Graduate School of Management Claremont Graduate University (2005) Claremont, CA Certificate in Corporation Management, Business Strategy Essential Peter F. Drucker Graduate School of Management Claremont Graduate University (2004) Claremont, CA Dispute Resolution Program Pepperdine University (2004) Malibu, CA Oversees Scholar in Cambridge University Magdalene College (2002) London, England License of Mediator, Filitator, Conciliator Issued by Los Angeles City Attorney's Office, May (2000) Los Angeles, CA Certificate Training of Mediator, Facilitator, Conciliator City Attorney's Office, October (1999) Los Angeles, CA Member of International Counter -Terrorism Officers Association (2006) I.C.T.O.A. Management/Supervision In -Service Training Odona Central Security, Inc., December (1998) Monterey Park, CA Management Multiple Projects, Objectives and Deadlines Skillpath Inc., June 1993 Pasadena, CA Powers to Arrest Approved Bureau of Security and Investigative Svc., April 1993 La Puente, CA Bachelor of Science (Equivalent) Major in Chemical Engineering, Shanghai Institute of Application Technology, July 1985 Shanghai, China 46 Page 191 Joe Leal, US Army jleal@absolutesecurityintl.com Summary of Experience: Established National, State and County Veteran collaborative programs; through outreach and engagement within the community recognized lack of consideration given to Veterans and their families in all areas of housing, employment, health and camaraderie. By establishing and strengthening public/private partnerships, engaging key stakeholders, coordinating activities and leveraging resources among collaborative entities to improve and empower Veterans' community partnerships. Energetically sharing the story of Veterans, educating the community and acquiring financial support through public speaking requests for those organizations outside of the Veteran community. Actively seeks and supports homeless Veterans throughout Southern California via personal connection, education, resources and solutions. With over 23 years of combined Military and Federal Service, I continue to organize and lead several events to better improve the lives of our brave men and women in uniform including their Families. Professional Skills: • Professional Development - Leadership, Supervision, Team Building, Performance Review and Reporting • Strategic Planning — Goal Setting, Policy Research & Analysis, Procedure Review — Performance Evaluation • Public/Private Partnerships, Collaboration — Government, Education, Nonprofit/Community, Employers/Business • Training and Special Event Planning, Coordination and Production • Grant Management —Budgeting and Resource Leveraging — Reporting • Marketing, Public and Media Relations Management • Project management • Directly involved in startup and longer-term implementation of $52M mental health program. Highly creative, all-encompassing outreach, treatment, and community prevention for military Families. • Established most effective satellite clinic in SGV; partnered with community program for space; educated community on services and within four months supported 50 military families and children • Within 10 months 6K military families/community partners engaged; clinic provided direct services to 1.5K military families. Personally, directed the development/revisions of outreach policies/protocols • Supervised 10 peers, interns and volunteers; mentored them on personal/professional goals, assigned outreach projects to reach diverse audience; guided problem solving; tracked and predicted trends Accomplishments: • Created the Vet Hunters Project; a nationwide Organization for homeless Veterans driven by 100% volunteerism. • Founded the San Gabriel Valley "Heroes in the Shadows," homeless Veteran Stand Down. Currently on our 5t' Annual. • Hand selected for the Steven A. Cohen Military Family Clinic at USC Advisory Board Member. Two time Recipient of the former President Obama "Call to Service Award" • KCET Local Hero Award for my approach to homeless outreach. • Telemundo National Heroes Award for my dedication to help end and prevent Veteran homelessness. • Association of the United States Army "Dwight D. Eisenhower" Family Readiness Group Leader Liaison • Employer Support of the Guard and Reserve "Seven Seals" award. • Latin Business Association Community Hero of the Year • Founder of the Los Angeles County Veterans Resource Expo • Founder of the Los Angeles County Fair Heroes Corner • Directly involved with LA County Military and Veterans Affairs homelessness program; planned, engaged and participated • Recognized as Veteran of the Year, 2014 Congresswoman Napolitano and Assembly member Hernandez Professional Experience Absolute International Security Director of Operations 2017 - Present Responsible for the daily operations of a 200 employee security corporation. Manage and direct an office staff of 20 to ensure that the management team exceeds all company expectations. Work closely with Account Managers to train, hire and mentor officers of the 47 Page 192 Joe Leal, US Army Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 / (909) 200-8960 / vetjoe.leal@yahoo.com https://www.linkedin.com/in/joe-leal-lbl9698S highest caliber. I work diligently to decrease non billable overtime, raise customer service and increase revenues and profits. I approve all weekly schedules, payroll and officer/supervisor reports. Meet regularly with staff to make sure all goals and objectives of the company are met. Department of Defense/Department of Army Los Angeles, CA Soldier and Family Readiness/Military Liaison 2009 - Present Provide administrative and clerical assistance to the Commander and Family Readiness Group (FRG) Leaders in the area of Family Preparedness during and prior to deployment. Event coordination consisted of scheduling speakers from community based entities that provide resources to Soldiers, Veterans, and their families. Maintained Family Readiness Group volunteer files and coordinates training for interested volunteers. Assists with arranging travel to volunteer trainings through Defense Travel System. Contributes to combat readiness by promoting efficient and effective communication between command, Family Readiness Groups, and family members of a 4500 (plus) personnel. Performs periodic and special staff visits conducting compliance inspections throughout the command. Collaborates with Army Reserve Ambassadors, other Family Program agencies, and major subordinate commands of different echelons in order to effectively promote awareness of Soldier and family benefits through reintegration events. Responsible for scheduling and coordinating various family activities, deployment events, and training for FRG volunteers. Established awareness regarding public, military or administrative issues impacting the families of deployed military personnel. Enhance Soldier awareness of veteran resources and connect Service Members to community partners. Advises family members of military sponsors on areas of family services as well as organize and deliver briefings to encourage providing support to Soldiers and their Families. Carefully manage information and reports for the U.S. Army Support System Information Management System. SSIM as it is known, proved the Army Reserve Family Programs and Family Readiness with a web based records system that supports a wide range of readiness support requirements, case management, referral resources data management, event and session attendance planning, execution and recording and volunteer and data management. United States Army 1995-2004 Infantryman/Ordnance Corps Trained Soldiers in Water Born and Jungle Operations, Fort Sherman Panama. Trained Bosnian and Hungarian Soldiers in Operation Joint Guard as part of the KFOR Operations. Was also a West Point Military Academy instructor (Camp Buckner) in the Bayonet, Combat Life Saver and OPFOR training operations. Trained the Iraqi Police force during Operation Iraqi Freedom. Deployed to Kuwait and Iraq in the initial invasion to help assure safety of U.S. personnel. Conducted combat operations in support of operation enduring freedom. Taught Land Navigation in the Army Reserve to Soldiers prepping to take part in Non -Commission Officer Schools. Took part in postal procedures training with the US Postal Service and gained the certification to run an Infantry Battalion mail room. I was directly in charge of 10 Soldiers during this period. Helped create and taught segments of the Yellow Ribbon Reintegration Program within the Army Reserve. Selected to take charge of medical transportation operations at the Wounded Transition Battalion at Fort Bliss. Responsible for a Platoon of Soldiers who's duties were to transport the wounded to and from their medical appointments from Fort Bliss to William Beaumont Hospital. During my time, zero accidents with 100% accountability of appointments. Started an education continuation program at West Point Military Academy for enlisted Soldiers career progression. Veteran Learning Centers of America Director of Education and Security Training 2014-2016 Performed a variety of complex and highly responsible professional and administrative management functions with oversight of the training division of the Veteran Learning Centers of America. Performed work that involved analysis, coordination, monitoring, research, special projects and training/education budget preparation and oversight. Directed training and educational activities, seminars, symposiums, conferences, webinars, and workshops, which will included analyzing and evaluating training requirements; securing facilities and instructors for training. Assisted in the development of marketing campaigns for new training/educational products and services. This included formulating a specific budget and expenditure plan for each Research and solicits grant opportunities and developed grant proposals for the Academy. Interacted with media, press, legislators and other associations. 48 Page 193 Joe Leal, US Army Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 / (909) 200-8960 / vetjoe.leal@yahoo.com https://www.linkedin.com/in/joe-leal-lb196985 Volunteer Expertise The Vet Hunters Project Founder/Executive Director 2010 — Present Managing a diverse team of volunteers, clinical social workers and case managers to eliminate homelessness amongst Veterans in California and beyond, through outreach and clinical engagement, by providing access to mental health and substance abuse treatment, and helping to connect Veterans to employment and income resources. Fundamental to our mission is creating diverse housing choices for our homeless Veterans. Instrumental in organizing numerous outreach missions throughout Southern California to include bringing supportive services from the VA outreach teams, Vet Centers, County Veteran Service Officers, nonprofits and community partners. These day and night missions provide food, clothes, hygiene kits, blankets and help develop a trusting relationship within the homeless community. Worked independently to coordinate with cities, homeless service providers, and other related agencies; performed a wide variety of professional, administrative, fiscal and analytical support within assigned program areas, including budget preparation, financial management, and grant coordination; conducts research; supervises assigned functions with emphasis on professional administrative methods. Always aware of all aspects of homelessness such as the causes, extent of the problem, demographic profile, available funding and service delivery systems, and gaps in service. Extensive knowledge of Federal and State laws, statutes, regulations and rules governing homelessness. San Gabriel Valley Veterans Employment Committee 2013-2016 Chairman In my position as Chairman, with an amazing team of volunteers, we were able to have five consecutive homeless Veteran Stand Down events which also included a variety of resource and job fair. Provided a "clearinghouse" for questions, complaints, and recommendations concerning effectiveness of employment services available to veterans and eligible persons at the local level. Encouraged employers from the public and private sectors to list job openings with local AJCC offices and participate in employment programs. Publicized the important advantages of hiring, training, and retraining qualified Veterans and emphasize EDD's priority services to veterans. Encouraged organized veterans' groups and individuals to report all job openings to EDD field offices. Formed action committees to review local Veteran's employment issues and submit recommendation and comments on position papers to appropriate entities. Assisted individuals or organizations who may have questions, complaints, suggestions, or recommendations on the employment services being provided to veterans by EDD. Conferred regularly with field office managers and/or staff on policy matters. Reviewed departmental operating procedures as they apply to veterans and notify field office managers of infringements or violations. Employer Support of the Guard and Reserve (E.S.G.R) 2016 - Present Deputy Director of Military Outreach Army Reserve (Department of Defense) Work with employers and Service members to prevent, reduce, or resolve misunderstandings regarding employment rights and responsibilities. Inform and educate members of the Guard and Reserve regarding their employment rights and responsibilities under USERRA. Work with military and civilian media organizations to promote public understanding of the ESGR mission. I also help train E.S.G.R. Ambassadors who work with Army Reserve Commanders to deliver ESGR/Work for Warriors resources within their commands and provide a constant presents within their command by establishing "Employer/Employment Support Centers" on every drill, SRP and Yellow Ribbon events. Ambassadors assist with; Employment (i.e., Work for warriors supporting members of the Army Reserve and their spouse), help troops reward supportive employers with plaques and ceremonies, inform service member & employer on benefits, obligations and opportunities, facilitate the updating of unit Civilian Employer Information (CEI) data base, refer Army Reserve members who need to mediate an employer conflict (Federal & State Mobilizations), identify employers so we can gain their support with "Statement of Support (SoS)" and attend Job Fairs where military members are present. Los Angeles County 2017 - Present Veterans Advisory Commission Honoring the service and sacrifice of Veterans and their families. This Commission supports changes brought forth from veteran community, constructs recommendations to Board of Supervisors and serves as a body of collected leaders to support the veterans and their families. Serving as Commissioner, I hope to lead the commission in the following areas; reintroducing ourselves to the 49 Page 194 Joe Leal, US Army Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 / (909) 200-8960 / vetjoe.leal@yahoo.com https://www.linkedin.com/in/joe-leal-lb196985 community, engaging in conversation with veterans and their families and support the Department of Military and Veteran Affairs to connect more veterans to their benefits and filing claims. Steven A. Cohen Military Clinic Advisory Board Member 2016 - Present Hand selected as one of the founding community advisory members in this exciting new project, I will be directly involved in organizing the startup and longer-term implementation of a broad outreach, treatment, and community prevention program designed to offer cutting-edge treatment and practical assistance to veterans and their families throughout Los Angeles County. Cohen military family services will be provided through five modalities: a mobile outreach van, TeleHealth, home visitation, Smartphone applications and psychiatric clinical services located in downtown Los Angeles. Education and Certification University of Phoenix - Bachelor's Degree Human Services in Social Work United States Army - Certification Volunteer Management and Duty to Warn Protocol United States Army — Certification Trained in Applied Suicide Intervention Skills Training United States Army — Certification Army Family Team Building Master Trainer Course (Army) United States Army — Certification National Association of Child Care Resource & Referral Agencies United States Army — Certification Equal Employment Opportunity Anti -Harassment United States Army — Certification Support Services Information Management System United States Army Family Programs — Certification Army Integrated Family Support Network Institute Professional References Supervisor Hilda Solis District One 856 Kenneth Hahn Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, CA 90012 Hector Elizalde Deputy Director Veterans/Military Liaison US Representative Grace F. Napolitano El Monte MG (Retired) Paul Mock Chairman Employer of the Guard and Reserve Eric Garner, CPT US Army HQ Commander 155th CSSB Army Reserve Monica Christianson, PhD Veterans Center Director Citrus College 50 Page 195 Bryan Colindres Email: bcolindres@absolutesecurityintl.com OBJECTIVE: I am seeking a training manager position in which I may interact with subordinates/students and blend obtained knowledge working as a certified training manager in the private security sector, an instructor at Orange Unified School District, a police officer (field training officer) with the City of Los Angeles and as an Army Veteran. I want to use my knowledge to teach others about the exciting world of Public Service. I am bilingual in English and Spanish. EMPLOYMENT HISTORY 12/2015 -Present - Absolute International Security Inc. Certified Training/Quality Assurance Manager 4255 Tyler Ave EI Monte, CA 91731 (626) 858-7188 10/2014-09/2015 - Orange Unified School District (City of Orange ROP) Criminal Justice/CSI Instructor 1401 N. Hardy St., Orange, CA 92867 (714) 628-4000 09/2013-10/2014 - Southeast ROP (Norwalk -La Mirada Unified School District) CJ/CSI Instructor 12940 Foster Rd, Norwalk, CA 90650 (562) 860-1927 10/2006-03/2010 - L.A. World Airport Police Department, PSS Field Training 6320 W. 96th Street, Los Angeles, CA 90045 (310) 646-0200 Police Officer 03/2003-03/2009 - U.S Army Cavalry Scout (Reconnaissance) Sergeant 950 N. Cucamonga Ave., Ontario, CA 91764 EDUCATION/TRAINING 06/2011-08/2014 - East San Gabriel Valley Regional Occupational Program West Covina, CA Criminal Justice Associates Degree Program (Associates Degree Awarded) 05/2013 - California Commission on Teacher Credentialing Sacramento, CA Career Technical Education Teaching Credential (Public Service) 11/2011 - Rio Hondo College Whittier, CA Peace Officer Standard Training (P.O.S.T. / PAC 43.14 Field Training Officer Course) (Certified as FTO on 11/07/2008) 06/2007-07/2007 - L.A. World Airport Police Police -Peace Officer Standard Training, Los Angeles, CA 832.1 P.C. Aviation Security Training (Certified on 06/08/2007) 10/2006-05/2007 - Los Angeles Police Department Los Angeles, CA Los Angeles Police Department Academy (DIPLOMA 05/25/2007) QUALIFICATIONS • Excellent customer service skills • Excellent verbal and written communication skills • Ability to work independently and in a team -oriented environment • Ability to organize, plan and coordinate multiple tasks with a high sense of urgency and follow-through • Involved in plenty of various investigations and arrest • Can create curriculum for any environment in designated field • Ability to work effectively with people from diverse backgrounds • Trained and protected lower enlisted personnel • Operated daily in administration environment/ support in field operations • Veteran of operation enduring freedom • Willing to travel ***LIST OF AWARDS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST **** 51 Page 196 J), ABSOLUM ATERMEOML SECtuff -illllllllllllllllllll�lllllllllllllllllllllllllil�ll . Ronald Frost (626) 858-7188 rfrost@absolutesecurityintl.com Education Background California State University of Long Beach (from 1983 to 1988) Major: Social Studies Minor: Criminal Justice Work Experience: General/Operations Manager—Absolute Security International Inc. (From 2015 to present) Mr. Frost personally handles daytime Field Supervision as well as Scheduling of all Personnel. He ensures all posts are filled and clients are never left wondering why an Officer did not show up for work. Mr. Frost makes certain any issues pertaining to customer service are addressed and personally interviews all incoming personnel. He oversaw the Operation Department, but also oversees a variety of additional support functions including Human Resources, Marketing/Branding, Risk Management, Business Development, Logistics, and the Guard Services Training Program. Operations Manager—Absolute Security International Inc. (From 2011 to 2015) Mr. Frost was at the helm of the Overall Operations services at AIS. He took an emphasis on training, mentoring and customer service. He had maintained the highest standards within a diverse range of administrative functions which included, but was not limited to the Director of Security for three large corporations and Management positions within other large security corporations. He had managed staff levels of all sizes and brings an increased level of service to the team. Senior Field Supervisor –Absolute Security International Inc. ( From 2009-2011) Required specifically to work with Operation Director, Field supervisors, and Security Officers. Mr. Frost supervises a team of field supervisors and security officers. Inspected buildings and grounds to ensure protection from intruders, fire hazards, theft, and vandalism. Developed emergency procedures, responded to incidents, and resolved problems or requested assistance of local authorities. Oversaw most day -to day operations and familiar with a variety of the field's concepts, practices, and procedures. At the meantime, he also conducted on -job training for security officers as needed. Education/Certification: • Firearms Training Certification • Baton Training Certification 52 Page 197 DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS PRIVATE License No. PP016302 Receipt No. 1263 ABSOLUTE INTERNATIONAL SECURITY, INC. 4255 TYLER AVE EL MONTE, CA 91731-1691 Bureau of Security and Investigative Services P.O: Box 989002 West Sacramento, CA 95798-.9002. (916) 322-4000 ERATOR Valid Until: 01/31/2019 In accordance with the P"' edvisions of Division 3, Chapter .11 "s of fhe .i3usiness . and Professsions. Code., the cornpany named hereon is issued .a�Private Patrol Operator License .Renewat.. . Bureau of Security and Investigative Services P.O. Box 9890d2 West Sacramento, CA 95798-9002 (916) 322-4000 �kCILITY Valid Until: 06/30/2020 AIS i>t aptlatice +nit tib (io�il'to;ns of ` 4255 TYLER AVE (2ivisipn 3, .Ef�apt r. €1.5 of -the Business EL MONTE, CA 91731-1691 and Professions C'dd6, the faeinty r►arned :, i r$ea Es.: issued. a. T>aairiing I✓�cilitjr. ::.C4rtflcate Rene,wai. NON -TRANSFERABLE - - - - POST IN PUBLIC - - - BLIc lllEllll WPITFB 10!2015 B TATs OF CA'L tF0RSV 1 A - DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS FIREARMS Certificate No TPF1300 Receipt No. 415 AIS. 425.5 TYLER AVE. EL MONTE, CA 91731-1691 Bureau of Security and Investigative Services P.O. Box 989002 West Sacramento, CA 95798-9002 (916) 3224000 FACILITY Valid Until: 06/3012020 ih.`ecfit�rdeoca. v;ithifire provist�ns�.of ' .0tvisior1.3„ Chapter ,1.1.5 of the Business arrd Prdfessiarrs'Cade, tho—facility named htreori is: Issued,.0 Trainlhg`Faciiity . < . Certificate .Renewai. - - - - NON -TRANSFERABLE = - POST IN PUBLIC VIEW ----- 53 WPITFF 1012015 Page 198 Thank you for your membership in CALSAGA! We are excited to have you as a part of our organization which represents more than 200 companies and over 70,000 officers. CALSAGA strives to: • Raise the overall quality of private security services and elevate the overall industry standards • Improve the public perception of private security ■ Advocate for industry interests with the State Legislature • Represent industry interests with the Departr sent of Consu„ ,er Affairs (DCA) and BSIS ■ improve business opportunities by educating consumers ■ Provide members with educational seminars and events on relevant industry regulations and issues Without your participation and financial support, we could not fulfill our efforts. Last fall we updated our training database. Please visit https://caIsaga.org/training/ to find out more information. This database is free to all CALSAGA members and is a great way to house all the training certificates for your officers or staff. Please don't hesitate to contact me if I can assist you with the database! The 2017 CALSAGA Annual Conference was a success! Cheek out the recap at https://ca lsaga.org/2017- annual-conference-recap/. Details about the 2018 Annual Conference will be announced soon. We hope you'll make plans to attend! Again, thank you for your membership in CALSAGA. Your involvement is important and very much appreciated. Sincerely, Kate Waiface Communications Manager CALSAGA kwallace@caisaga.org �- 4 Absolute Security international, Inc. Lucy Lits Membership Expiration: 8/31/2018 54 915 L Street, #C251, Sacramento, CA 95814 1 P:916-930-0552 1 www.calsaga.org I news@calsaga.org Page 199 rRw�t�F�L Z,j INCORPORATED 1871 .Know All Men By These Present ... that Absolute International Security having fulfilled the requirements for membership has been affiliated by the NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OFAMERICA subject to the continued compliance with provisions of the Bylaws and Regulations now in effect and or hereafter adopted by the Association. r Given Under my hand and seal of VIP* e /61 the Association at .Fairfax, Virginia Wayne R. LaPiere fr. this 9th day of May 2017 Executive Vice President 55 Page 200 0 1ACLBA International Association of Cam us Law Enforcement Administrators 342 North Main Street, Suite 301, West Hartford, GT 06117-2507 PHONE: (OW) 586-7517. FAX: (660) 586-7550 - Email Address: ' Website: March 21, 2017 Ms. Lucy Lin President Absolute Security International, Inc 4255 Tyler Avenue El Monte CA 91731 UNITED STATES Dear Colleague, Thank you for your membership in IACLEA, the Leading Authority for Campus Public Safety. Anticipating the future, its role and the level of expectations IACLEA has created in higher education law enforcement, your Board of Directors took decisive action this year to continue the advancement of LACLEA. To best position and support our pursuit of these objectives, we have hired a campus public safety leader as the new Executive Director, We've also restructured our dues so that we will most effectively assist our agencies in developing the next generation of campus public safety leaders. A key advancement in our membership plans for all U.S. Institutional Members, includes the ability to add as many as 18 Professional Members to your Institutional Membership, depending on the package you select. In the coming year, we will further expand our new direction by developing a Command College program for supervisory personnel. We recognize the mission of IACLEA is far more effectively accomplished and our organization is stronger when our membership base includes the leaders of tomorrow working with the leaders of today. We invite you to look forward to upcoming announcements regarding our new membership recruitment campaign in the coming weeks. IACLEA's Strategic Plan includes a focus on enhancing professional development, strengthening advocacy and collaboration to advance the profession, and elevating the profession's public image. To reaffirm these goals, I invite you to review the annual Strategic Accomplishments Statement for 2015-2016, Additionally, IACLEA remains committed to meeting the needs and addressing the challenges of our members through valuable benefits, including: Communication to Deep You Current and Connected – As a valued IACLEA member, you get access to our bi- monthly Campus Law Enforcement Journal, monthly E -Newsletters, and three times a week IACLEA News Digest. Professional Development to linprove Job Performance – IACLEA continues to proudly host our webinar series on key industry topics and offer our Loaned Executive Management Assistance Program (LEMAP) an industry-leading management consultation and technical assistance program. And IACLEA's Annual Conference & Exposition – the premier meeting for Campus Public Safety Leaders—we provide an unparalleled experience of educational sessions and Opportunities for leaders to engage in strategic peer information exchanges, and provide a venue that offers attendees a wide array of opportunities to share ideas, gain knowledge, and build and strengthen relationships. Tools & Resources to Make Your Joh Easier – Your IACLEA Connections, the online networking platform, provides our members with access to a Resource Library, containing more than 1,000 model policies, informative articles and best Practices documents. As a member, you can take advantage of your colleagues' knowledge and expertise by utilizing IACLEA-I, an a -group discussion community of over 2,000 industry professionals worldwide. IACLEA's Corporate Partner program also provides members with cost savings on select products and services. Accreditation to Ensure Your Agency Meets High Standards – If your organization is seeking a new standard ill certified -service quality and best -practices, you can pursue IACLEA Accreditation to assure students, faculty, visitors, 56 Page 201 <111r.� eft ABSOLUTE ATERNATIONAL SECUMTY �_� � •�+� � _�� State Lic.: PPO 16302 .-. IIiiIIIiIIIIIIIIIfIIIIIIIIIf�ilfii�f�illllllf�li��: - 4255 Tyler Ave (626) 858-7188 El Monte, CA 91731 Fax: (626) 858-2882 www.absolutesecurityintl.com Toll Free (866) 969-7188 Please send DAR's to: dar@absolutesecurityintl.com Daily Activity Report Date: Page of Officer Name Officer's ID # Shift Day of the Week Jobsite Name Jobsite Address Relieved By Radio Passed Keys Passed YOUR OBSERVATIONS CHECK LIST Yes No Additional Equipment Received From 1. New Instruction Received 2. Classified Information Violation Date/Time Narrative/ Observations 3. Suspicious Actitvies 4. Tresspassers, Intrusion, Alarms 5. Windows Doors, Offices Unlocked 6. Theft, Attempted Thefts 7. Maintenance Required (Lights out) 8. Broken Devices (Gates, Locks) 9. Parimeter Hazards 10. Lot Violations 11. Fire Hazards 12. Fire Door, Lanes, Exits Blocked 13. Fires Fire Alarms 14. Outside Security Hazards 15. Smoking Violations 16. Fire Extinguisher Check 17. Sprinkler Heads, Risers Blocked 18. Unusal Odors 19. General Safety Hazards 20. Smoking Violations 21. Manchinary Left Running 22. Hazardous Stacking 23. Electical Hazards 24. Electical Box Violation 25. Unsafe Vehicle Operation 26. Unsafe Practices 27. Health Hazards 28. NO SECURITY Reviewed By ID # This report is created by AIS for our client's only. It is not intended for anyone other than the specific client. The contents of this reports are the observations at the particular jobsites. Since the report may expose some security issues, the specific client who receives this report should not disclose the contents of this report to any other party due to the 29. INCIDENT REPORT TAKEN 30. SUPERVISOR NOTIFIED Anv'YES' Answers shall be described in Remarks narrative of this report sensitive nature of the report. AIS does not assume any liability if any of this report is disclosed to any third party for any reason without a written permission from AIS. Page 202 Qal\AT£ SECIII(�rpPRfIAT��,~� ABSOLUTE INTERNATIONAL SEPRITY e Phone: (626) 858-7188 Fax: (626) 858-2882 www.absolutesecurityintl.com Incident Report Incident Type Clients Name Jobsite Clients Address Jobsite Address Date, Time, Day of Occurrence Location of Occurrence CODE: V - VICTIM W - WITNESS I - INFORMANT R - REPORTING PARTY P - PARTY Code # of L. NAME F. NAME M. NAME SEX ETHNICITY I DOB AGE RES. ADDR. CITY ZIP VICTIM CLASSIFICATIONS # RES. PHONE BUS. ADDR. CITY ZIP English Speaking? BUS. PHONE Code # of L. NAME F. NAME M. NAME SEX ETHNICITY DOB AGE RES. ADDR. CITY ZIP VICTIM CLASSIFICATIONS # RES. PHONE BUS. ADDR. CITY ZIP English Speaking? BUS. PHONE CODE: S - SUSPECT SJ - SUBJECT S/V - SUBJECT/ VICTIM SJ/V - SUBJECT/ VICTIM Code # of L. NAME F. NAME M. NAME DRIVER'S LICENSE (STATE & NO.) RES. ADDR. CITY ZIP RES. PHONE BUS. ADDR. CITY ZIP BUS. PHONE SEX RACE ETHNIC ORIGIN HAIR EYES HEIGHT WEIGHT DOB AGE CHARGE WHERE DETAINED OR CITE # AKA MONIKER BOOKING # Code # of L. NAME F. NAME M. NAME DRIVER'S LICENSE (STATE & NO.) RES. ADDR. CITY ZIP RES. PHONE BUS. ADDR. CITY ZIP BUS. PHONE SEX RACE ETHNIC ORIGIN HAIR EYES HEIGHT WEIGHT DOB AGE CHARGE WHERE DETAINED OR CITE # AKA MONIKER BOOKING # VEHICLE # STATUS LICENSE (STATE & NO.) YEAR MAKE MODEL BODY TYPE COLOR REGISTERED OWNER IDENTIFYING FEATURES GARAGE NAME/ PHONE OFFICER EMPLOYEE # SUPERVISOR EMPLOYEE # SHIFT OPERATIONS EMPLOYEE # DATE TIME This report is created by AIS for our client's reference only. It is not intended for anyone other than the specific client. The contents of this report are the observations at the jobsites. Since the report may expose some security issues, the specific clients who receives this report should not disclose the contents of this report to any other party due to the sensitive nature of the report. AIS does not assume any liability if any part of this report is disclosed to any third pa rty for any reason without a written permission from AIS. 09 -OP -106-00003 Page 203 45f 41S S&eRryi SCI pE _ ABSOLUTE INTERNATIONAL SUCUM � � "$ � iilllllllliiiiliillNiililillilll1111illilllllllll; � ��'� Supervisors Daily Report Supervisor Name: Supervisor ID#: Date: Day of Week: Start Time: Vehicle Number: Starting Mileage: Ending Mileage: Total Mileage: Vehicle Inspection Report Completed? ❑ Yes ❑ No Jobsite Name: Jobsite Address: Date of Visit: Start Time: End Time: Notes and Observations: Officer Assigned: Officer Name Printed: Officer Signature Officer Daily Report Reviewed? ❑ Yes ❑ No Jobsite Name: Jobsite Address: Date of Visit: Start Time: End Time: Notes and Observations: Officer Assigned: Officer Name Printed: Officer Signature Officer Daily Report Reviewed? ❑ Yes ❑ No Jobsite Name: Jobsite Address: Date of Visit: Start Time: End Time: Notes and Observations: Officer Assigned: Officer Name Printed: Officer Signature Officer Daily Report Reviewed? ❑ Yes ❑ No 4255 Tyler Avenue, EI Monte, California 91731 Telephone (626) 858-7188 Facsimile (626) 858-2882 Toll Free (866) 969-7188 www.absolutesecurityintl.com Page 204 ABSOLUTE PURMPONAL SECUffff UL"Pmu-ne% 111111!IIIIIIIIIIUIIIIIIfIIIIIIIIIIIiIIIIIIiIU� DISCIPLINARY ACTION NOTICE DATE: NAME OF EMPLOYEE: DEPARTMENT: TITLE: TYPE OF VIOLATION(S) Oral Written Issued Date Issued By Title Abandoned Post Failure to Follow Instruction Violation of Company Policies/Procedures 2"d Warning Absent / No Call No Show Insubordination Violation of Dress Code (Uniform) Attendance Issue Lateness or Early Quit Violation of Safety Rules Carelessness Rudeness to Other Person Willful Damage to Materials or Equipment Disorderly Conduct Unsatisfactory Work Quality Working on Personal Matters Other: NUMBER OF VIOLATION(S) Oral Written Issued Date Issued By Title 1St Warning 2"d Warning Further Action Dept. Head/Manager/Supervisor Statement Employee Statement Action to be taken _ Warning _ Probation _ Suspension _ Termination _ Other Consequences should incident occur again: As stated in the Unlawful Harassment Policy, "The Company is committed to providing a work environment that is free of discrimination. In keeping with this policy, the Company strictly prohibits discrimination or harassment of any kind, including discrimination or harassment on the basis of race, color, veteran status, religion, gender, sex, sexual orientation, age, mental or physical disability, medical condition, national origin, marital status, or any other characteristics protected under Federal or State law or local ordinance. This anti -harassment policy applies to all persons involved in the operation of the company and prohibits unlawful harassment by any employee of company, including supervisors and co-workers. " I, the undersigned employee, have read this Disciplinary Action Notice and fully understood it. EMPLOYEE: Signature Print Name Date President Vice President Department Head HR office Recording 4255 Tyler Avenue, EI Monte, California 91731 Telephone (626) 858-7188 Facsimile (626) 858-2882 Toll Free (866) 969-7188 www.absolutesecurityinti.com Page 205 QUALITY ASSURANCE INSPECTION REPORT Contractor Supervisor: Inspection Day/ Date: Employee Name: Job Title: Employee Information Inspection Items Assignment Item Yes No Comments Flashlight Communications Sam Browne Current Guard Card #: Exp. Date: Proper Uniform Safety Vest Pepper Spray # CPR # First Aid # Baton # Current Driver's License #: Exp. Date: Page 206 Name ABSOLUTE MERMPOW SECURITY ')'111111111111111111111111111111111111 VI-2 I IIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIII III I IIIIIII IiI1riIINIHlllllll l I D# Pay Period: to Date I Time In I Time Out I Time In I Time Out I Hours I Job Site/Location I Approval Total Hours Signature: Date: Final Approval: California law mandates that you must take a 30 minute meal break, when you work more than 5 hours a day. You MUST begin your meal break BEFORE you start working more than 5 hours. For example, if you begin work at 6:00am, your meal break must begin no later than 11:00am (5 hours after you begin work). California law also mandates that you take a 10 -minute, duty free, rest break for every four (4) hours worked or major fraction thereof. The law requires that you take a 10 -minute rest break in the middle of each 4 -hour work period (e.g., at the 2 -hour mark). These are paid breaks, and can NOT be voluntarily waived. I certify under the penalty of perjury that the above hours accurately represent my working and meal break hours. I further certify that to the extent I worked less than 6 -hours on a given day and waived my right to a meal break OR worked less than 12 -hours in a day and waived my right to a second meal break, I did so VOLUNTARILY of my own free accord and without any coercion from my employer. I also certify that I have taken ALL of my 10 -minute rest breaks to which I am entitled under California law, as fully explained to me by my employer. 4255 Tyler Ave • EI Monte, California 91731 Toll Free (866) 969-7188 • Telephone (626) 858-7188 • Facsimile (626) 858-2882 www.absolutesecurityintl.com Please send time cards to: timecards@absolutesecurityintLcom Page 207 I '� 091 OWLETE ITEHITIONA Wim ABSOLUTE INTERNATINAL SECURITY GUARD SIGN -IN / SIGN -OUT SHEET POST: LOCATION: DATE NAME(PRINT) SIGNATURE TIME -IN TIME-OUT APPROVED INITIAL 4255 Tyler Avenue, EI Monte, California 91731 Telephone (626) 858-7188 Facsimile (626) 858-2882 Toll Free (866) 969-7188 www.absolutesecurityinti.com Page 208 PARKING VIOLATION WARNING BRUTE MOIR 81R7Y r-�- Nonce: This Vehicle is improperly parked for the following rea- son (s): Reserved Parking Only Parking * For "Tenanl''s Customer Only" 7 Parking Fire lane Lj Parked in NO PARKING space/area Unattended Vehicle Parked in 2 SPACES Blocking driveway or access Dher location: This vehicles's description hos been PERMANENTLY RECORDED. Failure to conform to our reg loons may result its towing and storage at DRIVER'S EXPEMSE ANE) REVOCATION OF PARKING PRIVILEGES. CVC 22658A PARKJ14G Pl,,Wr+ NO, OTF-R F. 11 VEH'C:E MAKE/MODEL APPX YEAR VEHICLE C0LOAf5] X TAG NO. RRiVER'S N AME ISSECURITY OFFICER Page 209 EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN Name Date 09 -OP -106-008 Page 210 O � U HAZARD �' O �° Uz¢ U H Q Are you required to have an emergancy plan? Does the emergency action plan comply with the requirements of T8 CCR 3220 (a)? Have emergency escape procedures and routes been developed and communicated with all employers? Do employees, who remain to operate critical plant operations before they evacuate, know the proper procedures? Is the employee alarm system that provides a warning for emergency action recognizable and perceptible above ambient conditions? Are alarm systems properly maintained and tested regularly? Is the emergency action plan reviewed and revised periodically? Do the employees know their responsibilities: For reporting emergencies? During an emergency? For conducting rescue and medical duties? Name Date 09 -OP -106-008 Page 210 - - HSONTE INTEDITIONAL SECUETY Allsip" AXIS FIRE WATCH ACCOUNT NAME: Speacial Security checks information for patrol offices: TIMES OF PATROL CHECKS: OFFICERS OBSERVATIONS AND NOTATIONS: TIME START: TIME END: OFFICER'S SIGANATURE: DATE 4255 Tyler Avenue, EI Monte, California 91731 Telephone (626) 858-7188 Facsimile (626) 858-2882 Toll Free (866) 969-7188 www.absolutesecurityinti.com Page 211 Onn s�at� USOICTE 17=111,10NA SECUlff StateL 1-1-0 L630 Bomb Threat Receive Form 1. Person Receiving call: 2. Time Date: 3. Statement received: 4. Caller's Identity Sex: Voice (check X) Language (check X) 5. Background Noises Date: Age Approximation: Accent: Loud High Pitch Pleasant Soft Deep Slow Stutter Slurred Deliberate Nasal Lisp Raspy Incoherent Angry Calm Coherent Emotion Laughing Disorted Intoxicated Distinct Fast Rational Irrational Excellent Fair Foul Good Factory Machine Office Machines Steet Traffic Quite Airplanes Party Sounds 6. Any other information Poor Bedlam Mixed Trains Voices Music Animals Page 212 5x AWLUTE MEMATIOML SECURITY Daily Vehicle Inspection Checklist Please indicate "Yes" or "No" besides each line item as apporpriate. Date: Time: Vehicle Number: Make and Model: Employee Name: Starting Mileage: Ending Mileage: Total Miles: Employee Signature: Are the windows/windshield cracked? Are the headlights/tail lights in working order? Do the automatic window rollers/sideview mirrors work? Does the heating/air conditioning and windshield defogging system work? Do the interior lights work? Is the maintenance light on? Are the tires in good shape (no damage and all appear to be properly inflated?) Any unusual oil/grease leaks (under or around the vehicle)? Is the vehicle clean inside and out? Comments: *Please note any scratches/marks on the diagram. AIS employees are required to complete a copy of this form prior to the operation of any AIS owned and operated vehicle. Completion of this form prior to operation is critical in the identification and aviodance of potential vehicular malfunctions/defects that may create potential health and safety issues. Employees MUST clean up after use of company vehicles. This form must be submitted to the office at the end of the shift. 16 -OP -106-0023 Page 213 SOLUR RAN' CR�RM PATItOI. TAo Officer Name: oficer's ld#: Jobsfte Name: Jobs!te Address: Date: Page 214 ABSOLUTE ATERNATIOML SECUUTY July 3, 2018 City of Rancho Cucamonga Purchasing Division Attn: Ruth Cain, CPPB, Procurement Manager 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Re: Additional Clarification RFP 917118-009 Transmitted via Electronic Mail Dear Ms. Cain, We are currently in the process of narrowing down the selection of GPS tracking software and equipment to be able to provide the City of Rancho Cucamonga with the best continuous, real- time, GPS tracking of all guards' movements and locations during service hours. Currently, GuardTrax and Kugadi have given us competitive offers with a variety of features and benefits. At this moment, we are conducting in -field testing and weighing the benefits of each before arriving at a final decision. Regardless of which vendor we decide on, we will be able to provide a real-time GPS guard tracking program for all our contracts, including the City of Rancho Cucamonga well before the contract inception. This service will be available in addition to our current GPS vehicle tracking as well as Deggy Monitoring systems. Should you have any further questions, please feel free to contact us at any time. Thank you so much for your time and continued consideration. Respectfully, Lucy Lin, President/QM Absolute Security International, Inc. 4255 Tyler Avenue El Monte, CA 91731 4255 Tyler Avenue, El Monte, CA 91731 - Toll Free (866) 96.9-7188 -Tel. (626) 858-7188 -Fax (626) 858-2882 - www.absolutesecurityintl.com Page 215 " ABSOLUTE ATEMATIOML SECURITY IllllllllllllllllllllllllllllullllllllllllllllllllSA July 3, 2018 City of Rancho Cucamonga Purchasing Division Attn: Ruth Cain, CPPB, Procurement Manager 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Re: Additional Clarification RFP 417118-009 Transmitted via Electronic Mail Dear Ms. Cain, In response to this line item spreadsheet for pricing, Item Description Additive/Alternative Bid Item 1 and 2, Park restroom Lock -Up and Gate Closure per schedule in Tables 1 and 2, the bid unit price of $23.73 is the hourly rate, and the correct daily rate would be ($23.73 x 4) $94.92, as calculated in your additional clarification request. The total annual amount for this item/category is $34,645.80 Should you have any further questions, please feel free to contact us at any time. Thank you so much for your time and continued consideration. Respectfully, Lucy Lin, President/QM Absolute Security International, Inc. 4255 Tyler Avenue El Monte, CA 91731 4255 Tyler Avenue, El Monte, CA 91731 • Toll Free (866) 969-7188 - Tel. (626) 858-7188 • Fax (626) 858-2882 - www.absolutesecurityintl.com Page 216 EXHIBIT C SCHEDULE OF UNIT COSTS Page 217 Page 218 Exhibit C Security Guard Services Rate Sheet (Rates effective through June 30, 2019) Schedule of Services Extra Work/Temporary Services Description Unit Rate Temporary Service Hour $ 19.48 Overtime Hour $ 29.22 Page 219 Est. Annual Regular Regular Est. Annual Holiday Holiday Estimated Location Unit Regular Qty. Rate Subtotal Holiday Hours Rate Subtotal Annual Cost Animal Care and Adoption Center 356 Hour $ 19.48 $ 6,934.88 9 $ 29.22 $ 262.98 $ 7,197.86 per schedule listed in RFP section 4.6 F Epicenter 2,922 Hour $ 19.48 $ 56,920.56 42 $ 29.22 $ 1,227.24 $ 58,147.80 per schedule listed in RFP section 4.6(C) Metrolink 6,672 Hour $ 19.48 $ 129,970.56 114 $ 29.22 $ 3,331.08 $ 133,301.64 per schedule listed in RFP section 4.6(E) Park Restroom Lock -Up and Gate Closure 365 Day $ 94.92 $ 34,645.80 0 $ $ - $ 34,645.80 per schedule in Table 1 Total: $ 233,293.10 Extra Work/Temporary Services Description Unit Rate Temporary Service Hour $ 19.48 Overtime Hour $ 29.22 Page 219 DATE: August 15, 2018 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: William Wittkopf, Public Works Services Director Michael Courtney, Maintenance Supervisor Inge Tunggaldjaja, Management Analyst I SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO RENEW CONTRACT CO 14-183 WITH CLIMATEC, LLC FOR CITYWIDE ENERGY MANAGEMENT AND HVAC AUTOMATION CONTROL. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council approve Amendment No. 4 to contract CO 14-183 with Climatec, LLC for "Citywide Energy Management and HVAC Automation Control"; extending the term of the contract to June 30, 2019, with a value of $35,000 for FY 2018-2019, and an estimated total contract value of $109,386 over the three years remaining on the contract; and, authorize the City Manager or his designee to renew the contract annually. BACKGROUND: On June 26, 2014, the City awarded contract CO 14-183 for "Citywide Energy Management and HVAC Automation Control" to Climatec, LLC. Climatec delivers an energy efficient approach to the City's HVAC automation systems located at the Cultural Arts Center, Archibald Library, City Hall, and Public Works Services Center. This contract has an option to renew in one year increments up to a total of seven years ending June 30, 2021. If approved, Amendment No. 4 to contract CO 14-183 will extend the term of the contract to June 30, 2019 for an additional $6,865 due to the change in the scope of work to included six additional site visits per year; other terms and conditions remain the same. ANALYSIS: Climatec, LLC has submitted a Letter of Intent expressing their desire to continue providing service to the City of Rancho Cucamonga during 2018/2019 with NO rate increase, with the exception of the additional services requested by the City. Staff is requesting the existing contract be renewed for the next three years, through June 30, 2021, which represents the remaining term of the contract. In anticipation of a possible request by the contractor for a Consumer Price Index (CPI -U) increase adjustment in future years, Staff has prepared the chart below to show the estimated annual funding breakdown. Please note this is only an estimate and the amounts listed below could vary. Fiscal Year Routine Est. Annual Total Routine Extra Work Grand Maintenance Increase (5%) Maintenance Total/Fiscal Year Page 220 2018/2019 1$28,764 1 - 1$28,764 1$6,236 $35,000 2019/2020 $28,764 1$1,438 $30,202 1$6,236 $36,438 2020/2021 1$30,202 1$1,510 1$31,712 1$6,236 $37,948 Grand Total $109,386 Climatec, LLC continues to provide great service to the City. Staff recommends City Council approve the renewal of contract CO 14-183 effective July 1, 2018 and approve the spending limit of $35,000 for FY 2018/2019 and the estimated total contract value of $109,386 over the three years remaining on the contract. FISCAL IMPACT: The contract price is within the contract services budget line items in the approved budget for FY 2018/2019. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: The provision of energy management and HVAC automation services enhances the City's premier community status through the use of energy efficient maintenance practices in City facilities. ATTACHMENTS: Description Amendment 4 Page 221 AMENDMENT NO. 004 to Professional Services Agreement (CO #14-183) between Climatec (hereinafter "Contractor") and City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter the "City") This Amendment No. 004 will serve to amend the Professional Services Agreement (hereinafter "Agreement"), CO# 14-183, to incorporate the following: The above mentioned. PSA has been in effect for four (4) years and has an option to renew in one (1) year increments to a total of seven (7) years. Item 1. The term of the agreement is hereby extended an additional year to June 30, 2019 in an amount that shall not exceed $35,000 for routine maintenance and extra work in FY 201812019. Said extension will be in accordance with the Contractor's letter of intent attached hereto as Exhibit A. This will be the fifth year of the agreement. Item 2. increase monthly routine maintenance lump sum cost as the result of additional scope of work. The new contract rates for FY 2018/2019 are attached hereto as Exhibit B. All other Terms and Conditions of the original Agreement C0914-183, will remain in full effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties, through their respective authorized representatives, have executed this Amendment by way of signature by both parties and on the date indicated below. Please return two (2) original signed copies to the City no later than July 10, 2018. The City will process both copies for signature and provide Climatec with one (1) fully executed copy of the Amendment. Climatec By: f Name Date say,ce aV-I§`� & a, Name Date Title (two signatures required if corporation) Last Revised: 09/28/20.12 City of Rancho Cucamonga By: Name Title By: Name Title Date Date Page 1 of 1 Page 222 MERGING BUILDINGS & TECHNOLOGY June 7, 2018 Inge Tunggaldjaja City of Rancho Cucamonga RE: Building Automation System Maintenance Services 2150 S. Towne Centre PI. Suite 200 Anaheim, CA 92806 Phone: (949) 474-0955 Fax: (949) 474-0956 CCL991066 Thank you for allowing us to service your building automation system over the past year(s). We have enjoyed the challenge and look forward to another successful ear of preventative maintenance, Your Technical Service Agreement will expire soon. We are offering continuation of this agreement effective for fiscal year 18-19 (July 1, 2018 through June 30, 2019) for the annual price of $28,764.00. The reason for the increase is due to increase of scope (6 additional site visits per year). An alternate tech will be provided to accompany the primary tech at least once per quarter during scheduled visits. To continue these essential services without further interruption, please sign below and return one copy of this letter to our offices via fax, email or mail. If you need us to reference a purchase order number, please enclose a copy for our records. This will ensure that it is referenced on all related invoices. Thank you for your continued support of Climatec. If I can be of any assistance to you, please do not hesitate to call me. Our Service to you and your complete Satisfaction is of my utmost concern. Climatec, LLC Sincerely, Name: Jaimeen Vora ,7aiwevi Vain Page 223 2 f a Date of Proposal Revision: TSA Start Date: TSA Erre Bate: Service Dispatch Number: Service Dispatch Email, June 7, 2018 2 July 1, 2018 June 30, 2019 (877)689-1649 SoCalService@Climatec.com This proposal will provide one ear of technical support services for the followin facility s : Facility Name: See Schedule D Facility Address: See Schedule D BY AND BETWEEN: CLIMATEC, LLC 2150 Towne Centre Place Suite 200 Anaheim, CA 92806 CLIENT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Click here. to enter Clients Strc t Adch•ess Clid here to enter Clients City, State & Zip This proposal is firm for one hundred and eighty (180) days and shall include the Terms & Conditions and Schedule(s) attached herein. Confidential Page 1 of 16 Porn Rev. Oct 2015 Page 224 SCHEDULE A -TYPE OF SERVICE PLAN El Attachment 1 - Energy Management & Control System Service ❑ Attachment 2 - Fire Alarm System Service ❑ Attachment 3 -Security System Service ❑ Attachment 4 - Climatec Axcess SCHEDULE 8 -- PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE E] Service Task 1 - EMCS Main Operator Workstation CI Service Task 2 - EMCS Network Analysis El Service Task 3 - EMCS Global Control Modules E7 Service Task 4 - EMCS Unitary Controllers ❑ Service Task 5 - Fire Alarm System Test & Inspection ❑ Service Task 6 - Security System Test & Inspection ❑ Service Task 7 - Card Access System Test & Inspection ❑ Service Task 8 - CCTV System Test & Inspection SCHEDULE C- LIST OF SERVICED EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE D - MISCELLANEOUS CONDITIONS SCHEDULE E - RATES, & PRICING TERMS Confidential Page 2 of 16 Form Rev. Oct 2015 Page 225 SCOPE OF SERVICES: Three visits every two months' test and inspection, technical support, and software services (as listed on attached Schedules A and B) for the Energy Management & Controls System. • Preventive Maintenance (see Schedule A, B & D for more details) 4 Database Protection • [Unlimited Telephone/Remote Support a Preferred Service Response Discounted Material and Labor SERVICES SHAD COMMENCE/TERM: This agreement shall commence upon approval of this document and shall continue for a term of one (1) year Confidential Page 3 of 16 Dorm Rev. Oct 2015 Page 226 CHARGES This agreement shall be billed quarterly and is due and payable upon the Client's receipt of invoice. First year: $28,764.00 Quarterly: $7,191.00* Monthly: $2,397.00* * Including Taxes, CLIMATEC, LLC Submitted by: aimeen Vora Name Pick Date Signature Date Business Development Specialist Title Approved by: Name: Signature Title Confidential Date Page 4 of 16 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Approved by: Name Signature Title Date Form Rev. Oct 2015 Page 227 Year 1 City Yard $6,624.00 Civic Center $8,064.00 Cultural Center $7,1.28.00 Archibald Library $6,948.00 Annual Price: $28,764.00 * Including Taxes, CLIMATEC, LLC Submitted by: aimeen Vora Name Pick Date Signature Date Business Development Specialist Title Approved by: Name: Signature Title Confidential Date Page 4 of 16 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Approved by: Name Signature Title Date Form Rev. Oct 2015 Page 227 1.0 GENERAL PROVISIONS 1.1 Unless stated otherwise, the services provided under this agreement shall be provided during Climatec, L.I.LC's normal business hours. Normal business hours are Monday through Friday, 8:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M. inclusive, excluding holidays. 1.2 The Client shall provide reasonable means of access to the equipment being serviced. Climatec, LLC shall not be responsible for any removal, replacement, or refinishing of the building structure, if required to gain access to the equipment. Climatec, LLC shall be permitted to start and stop all equipment necessary to perform the services herein described as arranged with the Client's representative. 1.3 This agreement, when accepted in writing by the Client and approved by an authorized Climatec, LLC representative, shall constitute the entire agreement between the two (2) parties. 2.0 CHARGES 2.1 For services not covered by this agreement, but performed by Climatec, LLC upon the Client's authorization, the Client agrees to pay Climatec, LLC upon presentation of itemized invoice(s) at Climatec, LL.C's prevailing rates. 2.2 If emergency service is requested by the Client and inspection does not reveal any defect for which Climatec, LLC is liable under this agreement, the Client will be charged at Climatec, LLC's prevailing rates. 2.3 Unless otherwise specified, this agreement will commence on the date indicated for the term of one (1) year and shall continue from year to year until terminated. Either party may terminate this agreement at any time by giving a thirty (30) day written notice to the other. The agreement price may be adjusted on its anniversary date based on mutual agreement, prevailing labor, and material costs. 3.0 LIMITATIONS OF LIABILITY 3.1 Climatec, LLC shall not be liable for any loss, delay, injury, or damage that may be caused by circumstances beyond its control including, but not restricted to; acts of God, war, civil commotion, acts of government, fire, theft, corrosion, floods, lightning strikes, freezes, strikes, lockouts, differences with workmen, riots, explosions, quarantine restrictions, delays in transportation, shortage of vehicles, fuel, labor or materials, or malicious mischief. IN NO EVENT SHALL CL1MA`I'EC, LLC BE LIABLE FOR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION, LOSSES, OR CONSEQUENTIAL OR SPECULATIVE DAMAGES, 3.2 Climatec, LLC shall not be required to make safety tests, install new devices, or make modifications to any equipment to comply with recommendations or directives of insurance companies, governmental bodies, or for other reasons. Confidential rage 5 of 16 Fornr Rev. Oct 2015 Page 228 3.3 Climatec, LLC shall not be required to make replacements or repairs necessitated by reason of the Client's personnel negligence, abuse, misuse, or by reason of any other cause beyond its control except ordinary wear and tear. 3.4 The agreement pre -supposes that all equipment is in satisfactory working order Climatec, LLC will inspect the equipment within thirty (30) clays of when the agreement takes effect and will advise the Client of any equipment found to be in need of repair. Climatec, LLC will provide the Client with a written estimate of the cost of repairs. If the Client does not atrtl7ar ize Climatec, LLC to make the repairs or if the Client does not have the work performed, the equipment will be eliminated from coverage and the agreement price will be adjusted. There may be some equipment which, for reasons beyond Climatec, LLC's control, cannot be inspected before this agreement takes effect. Climatec, LLC will inspect such equipment on the first available visit. 3.5 The amount of any present or future sales, use, occupancy excise, or other tax (federal, state, or local) which Climatec, LLC hereafter shall be obligated to pay, either on its own behalf or on the behalf of the Client or otherwise, with respect to the services and material covered by this agreement, shall be paid by the Client. 3.6 If the equipment or software included under this agreement is altered, modified, or changed by a party other than Climatec, LLC, this agreement shall be modified to incorporate such changes and the agreement price shall be adjusted accordingly. 3.7 It is understood that the provisions of this agreement apply only to the systems and equipment covered herein. Repair or replacement of non -maintainable parts of the system such as ductwork, boiler shell and tubes, unit cabinets, boiler re -factory material, electrical wiring, hydronic and pneumatic piping, structural supports, etc., is not included under the agreement. 3.8 Following twelve (12) months of service or any time thereafter, if individual item(s) cannot, in Climatec, LI.C's opinion, be properly repaired on-site because of excessive wear or deterioration, Climatec, LLC may withdraw the item(s) from coverage upon ninety (90] days priorwritten notice, 3.9 This agreement shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations, Confidential Page 6 of 16 Fornr Rev. Oct 2015 Page 229 ATTACHMENT 1- ENERGY MANAGEMENT & CONTROL SYSTEM SERVICE EMCS Primary Services: 2 Systein and Service Review, Climatec, LLC will hold an annual formal review with your staff to discuss the services performed during the past year and to recommend improvements and options to enhance system performance, resolve operations[ problems, and to meet your changing meds and objectives. N Preventive Maintenance. Maintenance shall be performed per the attached Schedule B to optimize the systenn effectiveness. N Software Maintenance, Climatec, LLC will furnish and install manufacturer's software revisions to maintain or improve present performance within the functional capabilities of your system. New software products shall be available for sale. N Database Protection. Climatec, LLC will protect your database by periodically saving this information and maintaining a copy on our premises. Database backups will be performed during normal support visits. N Telephone Support. Technical experts will assist you, via the telephone, to identify and resolve operational problems. E3 On -Line Service. Climatec, LLC will provide you with on-line assistance to troubleshoot your system and resolve operational problems, The Client is responsible for- LAN f telephone line installation crud casts. E System and Service Log. Climatec, LLC will provide a log for you to document concerns, system problems, and other related items requiring our attention. Each scheduled service visit shall begin with a review of this log. FX_ Documentation. All scheduled and unscheduled service visits will be documented by a work order form, listing materials used and hours spent. All work orders will be signed by an authorized Client representative to verify all work completed. For your staffs convenience, copies of all work orders and our service agreement scope will be kept in your System and Service Log. 0 Operator Training. Climatec, LLC will provide eight (8) ]Hours of on-site annual operator(s) training. The customer- may opt to attend a two-day operator training, limited to one (1) student, at Climatec's facility in Anaheim on an annual basis for the term of this agreement Confidential Page 7 of 16 Form Rev. Oct 2015 Page 230 ❑ Remote 24/7 Support, Climatec, LLC will provide on-line assistance, via telephone, internet, or VPN connection, 24/7 to identify, troubleshoot, and resolve system problems. Climatec, LLC shall provide software for secure connection to Climatec's remote server(s). Responsibility of providing the remote connection(s) will be ❑ The Client or ❑ Climatec, LLC. ❑ Fault Detection & Analytics. Through the use of advanced software tools, Climatec, LLC will continuously ensure that your systems are operating at peak performance and make proactive recommendations for improvements to your operation. fault detection & analytics will consist of applying advanced energy, comfort, and operational analytic rules that focus on optimizing your facilities energy savings, detecting any facilities comfort anomalies, while maximizing operational performances. ❑ Ongoing Data Mining, Reporting & Recommendations. 'rhe fault detection and data analytics software alone will identify issues and routinely send reports to users. Additionally, Climatec shall expand this reporting and include deep analysis of the data, to include energy modeling and detailed energy savings and benchmarking of the building(s). Analysis shall be done by a Certified Energy Engineer. Climatec shall review system data on a Cox, quarterly of ❑ monthly basis. ❑ Performance Review - Climatec will hold quarterly reviews with your staff to discuss the services performed during the past year and to recommend improvements and options to enhance system performance, resolve operational problems, and to meet your changing needs and objectives. Reviews will be held G -]X.. Online ❑ Onsite. EMC5 Premium Services: ❑ Component Repair and Replacement. Climatec, LLC will repair or replace failed components with new or reconditioned components of compatible design to minimize obsolescence and maintain system integrity at no additional charge. Exchanged parts shall become the property of Climatec, LLC: (see Schedule D for special conditions). ❑ Business Day Service. Service repair calls covered by this agreement shall he made five (5) days a week, during normal business hours at no additional charge (see Schedule D for special conditions), ❑ Premium Time Emergency Service. Emergency repair calls covered by this agreement shall be made seven (7) days a week, twenty-four (24) hours a day at no additional charge (see Schedule D for special conditions). ❑ On -Site Service. Climatec, LLC shall provide an on-site Service Specialist for zero (0) hours Confidential Page B of 16 l-orm Rev. Oct 2015 Page 231 ❑ Flex Hours Support Service, Flex Hours are technical support hours utilized at the owner's discretion. Whether it is online support from our office, or an on-site visit from a service technician. Climatec, LLC shall provide a Service Technician for sixteen (16) hours per year for the term of the support agreement. Hours will be tracked utilizing Field Service Reports. field Service Reports will be provided to the customer for signature authorization. Hours unutilized at agreement completion or termination will be forfeited and cannot be reallocated or carried over to a new agreement. (Purchased and utilized in 4-11Our minimums). Confidential Page 9 of 16 Form Rev. Oct 2015 Page 232 SERVICE TASK 1: EMCS — MAIN OPERATOR WORSTATION: On Each Scheduled Service: Visits to jobsite 3 Report in with appropriate customer personnel. Review EMCS system for critical and off-line status indications. Review EMCS system for override and disabled status indications. §� Review event and alarm log with customer and discuss EMCS operational concerns. Analyze the number of operator or system change occurrences for impact on performance. 3 Perform or schedule reactive or proactive maintenance procedures as appropriate to resolve situations noted. .. Install appropriate EMCS software refinements and updates. On a Scheduled Basis: Main Operator Workstation Check monitor for clarity, focus, and color. Cycle power and listen for unusual motor/bearing noise. 3� Verify proper system restart; check system date, time and hardware status. Clean exterior surfaces, including monitor. Clean dust from internal surface(s). -3' General security/software maintenance of the main operator workstation. Save/copy network workstation data base, including custom graphics and resident Master Controller archive data bases, as indicated in this agreement. NOTE: Revisions to other software programs not produced by Clirnatec are not included in this service task, however it can be added at the owner's request. Likewise, "Major Revisions" to the EMCS software, which acid new features and capabilities are not included. Excludes any customer IT maintained server. Confidential Page 10 of 16 Form Rev. Oct 2015 Page 233 SERVICE TASK 2: EMCS — NETWORK ANALYSIS: On a Scheduled Basis: Log onto the main operator workstation or global controller(s) to prove prober communication means. Review global controller error log. 'n for each main operator workstation and global controller unit: • Analyze communication. Perform online/offline test routine to determine power and communication restart. Provide a report summarizing network analysis results. As Required: 'n Analyze the error rate & transmission rate. Review trend logs. ' Review alarm logs. Perform the network analysis tasks as appropriate to verify or discount suspected communication problems. Perform communication "sniffing" if communication problems elude conventional troubleshooting (discussion of resource egUipment needs to be discussed with owner). -X- Perform the network analysis tasks as appropriate to evaluate the impact on network performance of various configuration options, as part of a proposed system expansion or modification. Confidential Page 11 of 16 born Rev. Oct 2015 Page 234 SERVICE TASK 3: FMCS — GLOBAL CONTROL MODULES: On a Scheduled Basis Check indications to verify proper DC power levels, appropriate transtxait and receive activity on the communication trunks, and check for possible Error Code indications. Confirm proper time sync of all Global Controller(s) with workstation. Inspect wiring for signs of corrosion, fraying and rapid discoloration, detective shielding, or shield grounding. Monitor LED sequencing for proper operation. Review Global Controller(s) device properties. N Remove excessive dust from internal surfaces. Verify / calibrate other points and control processes, where the need for possible proactive maintenance is indicated. Update firmware files, as required. Review and maintain software documentation. Confidential Page 12 of 16 Forni Reu Oct 2015 Page 235 SERVICE TASK 4: FMCS — UNITARY CONTROLLERS: On a Scheduled Basis —AHU Application Controller: Verify that HVAC Unit is being controlled at the appropriate value(s). Change one set point value. Verify smooth transition and stable control at the new set point, as required. il Return set point to original value. i Repeat for each additional control loop, as required. Verify the proper operation of critical control processes and points associated with this unit. Make adjustments, as required. Review and maintain software documentation. On a Scheduled Basis — Unitary Equipment Controller: -$: Verify that controller is in control at the desired value(s). Change one set point value. Verify smooth transition and stable control at the new set point, as required. �i Return set point to original value. 'X-. Repeat for each additional control loop, as required, Verify the proper operation of critical control processes and points associated with this Unit. Matte adjustments, as required. Review and maintain software documentation. Confidential Page 13 of 16 Form Rev. Oct 2015 Page 236 ENERGY MANAGEMENT & CONTROL. SYSTEM: EMCS operators' workstation, to include the operating software. EMCS global controller[s), to include the modern. 'h EMCS programmable and unitary controllers. 'x Associated EMCS controller devices such as relays, space sensors, OSA sensors, immersion sensors, current sensors, etc., used for control and/or status feedback by the controller's. The following enuinrnPnV shall hp sPrviri-d by CIimntar unrlar thiq 2ijrPPmPnt, Quantity Equipment Manufacturer Comments 7 Tridium Supervisor Tridium Civic Centel - 3 Global Controller 'Tridium Civic Center 1 Chiller CHWP CDWP Alerton Civic Center• 3 CT 1-iHW Sys VFD's Alerton Civic Center Approx. 191 VAV, FPV Units Alerton Civic Center Approx. 4 AHU, Sr, EF Units Alerton Civic Center Approx. 3 El; Data Monitoring Alerton Civic Center Approx. 9 Fan Coils, Split System Alerton Civic Center 1 R2 - Global Controller Tridium Cultural Center 58 VAV Units Alerton Cultural Center 1 Boiler S stern Alerton Cultural Center 10 Remote Panels Alerton Cultural Center 8 BACnet Unit Controller Alerton Cultural Center 1 Global Controller Tridium Archibald Library 13 [-seat Pump Alerton 12 Fan Coil Units Alerton 1 Global Controller Tridium Ci Yard 3 BACnet Unit Controller AC Units City Yard 6 Fan Coils Alerton CI ty Yard 27 VAV units Alerton City Yard 1 Boiler HWP s s Alerton City Yard 1 EF Confidential Page 14 of 16 Norm Rev. Oct 2015 Page 237 SPECIAL CONDITIONS: Sites to be serviced under this agreement: Site 1.: Civic Center 10500 Civic Center Dr., Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Site 2: Cultural Center '1.2505 Cultural Center Dr., Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91.739 Site 3: Archibald Library 7363 Archibald Ave., Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Site 4: City Yard 13794 Lion St., Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91.730 This agreement excludes any internal controls associated with the individual HVAC equipment, such as factory installed and/or manufacturer supplied internal control modules, not associated with the Energy Management and Control System(s), Preventive Maintenance: • Once Service'rechnician is on-site, Customer may utilize technician to perforin other tasks, with the understanding it will be in lieu of the Preventive Maintenance tasks. PREMIUM SERVICES: Confidential Page 15 of 16 lForni Rev. Oct 2015 Page 238 Rates: The following list contains the Customer Preferred labor rates that shall be used for services, provided by Climatec, LLC, that are requested by the Client for services not included in this agreement: :on -Contract Customers Contract.Customers Regular Time & Half Double Time Regular Time &Half Double Tirane -r, Standard Automation' Specialist $175.00 $262.50 $350.00 i45.00 '$21'7-.5 $29D 00 Advanced Application ' Specialist $215.00 $322.50 $430.00 $180.00-:T,`$270.66` Standard Automation Specialist: Specialist qualified in Building Automation System issues. Will address all HVAC controls issues associated with EMS systen), Responsible for tasks listed schedule A. Advanced Application.. Specialist: Specialist qualified in Climatec advanced offerings. Will address concerns associated with Dashboards, Optimization, and fault Detection. Preferred Response „Advantage: As a 'Technical Support Agreement customer, your service and support requests will receive preferred response. Your call will be processed at a higher- priority over non -TSA service and support calls. On an average we can provide a call back within 4 fours of the service call. PRICI NC - Additional Alerton parts and materials, requested by the Client, shall be available to the Client at a discount of list price less 50/0, less 10%. Confidential Page 16 of 16 Dorm Rev Oct 2015 Page 239 DATE: August 15, 2018 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: William Wittkopf, Public Works Services Director Neil Plummer, Maintenance Supervisor Inge Tunggaldjaja, Management Analyst I SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO RENEW OF CONTRACT CO 14-175 WITH ABC LOCKSMITHS, INC. FOR CITYWIDE KEYS, KEY REPAIR AND REPLACEMENT ON AN AS NEEDED BASIS. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council approve Amendment No. 5 to contract CO 14-175 with ABC Locksmiths, I nc. for "Citywide Keys, Key Repair and Replacement on an As Needed Basis" extending the term of the contract to June 30, 2019, and an estimated total contract value of $127,200 over the three years remaining on the contract; and, authorize the City Manager or his designee to renew the contract annually. BACKGROUND: In 1997, the City of Rancho Cucamonga implemented a new Citywide key system called Schlage Primus for all City facilities and Fire station buildings. The Schlage Primus key blanks, locks, and key codes are unique and protected, only to be used by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. ABC Locksmiths, Inc. has all the cut -codes and records used at the different City and Fire buildings and is the sole source vendor for keys, key repairs and replacements. ABC Locksmiths, Inc. also retains the exclusive right to make and/or copy any City/Fire issued key with the authorization from facilities management, which eliminates the risk of any person making copies of these secured keys. ANALYSIS: ABC Locksmiths, Inc. has submitted a Letter of Intent expressing their desire to continue providing service to the City of Rancho Cucamonga during 2018/2019 with NO rate increase. Staff recommends Council approve the renewal of contract CO 14-175 effective July 1, 2018 and approve the spending limit of $42,400 for FY 2018/19 and the estimated total contract value of $127,200 over the three years remaining on the contract. An additional $22,500 over three years for keys, key repair and replacement services for Fire District facilities will be considered separately by the Fire Board. FISCAL IMPACT: Page 240 The contract price is within the contract services budget line items in the approved budget for FY 2018/2019. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: The provision of key services enhances the City's premier community status through the maintenance of City facilities. ATTACHMENTS: Description Amendment Z) Page 241 AMENDMENT NO. 005 to Professional Services Agreement (CO #14-175) between ABC Locksmiths, Inc (hereinafter "Contractor") and City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter the "City") This Amendment No. 005 will serve to amend the Professional Services Agreement (hereinafter "Agreement"), CO# 14-175, to incorporate the following: The above mentioned PSA has been in effect for four (4) years and has an option to renew in one (1) year increments to a total of seven (7) years. Contractor, City and the Fire District would like to exercise the option to renew CO# 14-175 for one (1) additional year extending the Agreement Term Date to June 30, 2019. Said extension will be in accordance with the Contractor's Letter of Intent attached hereto. This would be the fifth year of the Agreement. All other Terms and Conditions of the original Agreement C0414-175, will remain in full effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties, through their respective authorized representatives, have executed this Amendment by way of signature by both parties and on the date indicated below. Please return two (2) original signed copies to the City no later than June 28, 2018. The City will process both copies for signature and provide ABC Locksmiths,Inc with one (1) fully executed copy of the Amendment. A Vit.hs, I/ B ennis Vessels 06120/18 Name Date President Title By: Name Date Title (two signatures required if corporation) Last Revised: 09/28/2012 City of Rancho Cucamonga 0 Name Date Title By: Name Date Title Page I of I Page 242 ABC Locksmiths, Inc. 9684 Foothill Blvd. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91730 909-987-2557 909-987-3838 fax To whom it concerns, June 14, 2018 It is the intention of ABC Locksmiths, Inc. to continue conducting business with the City of Rancho Cucamonga through the new 2018-2019 fiscal year. All company Insurance requirements will be renewed and kept to City requiremnets. All company information and all price structures and rates, charged to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, for services and goods on an as needed basis, will remain the same as they were for fiscal year 2017-2018. ABC Locksmiths, Inc. 1 Page 243 DATE: August 15, 2018 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Ruth Cain, CPPB, Procurement Manager Cheryl Combs, Procurement Technician SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO CONTINUE THE CITYWIDE PROCUREMENT OF GASOLINE AND DIESEL FUEL FROM SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL COMPANY DBA SC FUELS ON A MONTH TO MONTH BASIS FUNDED BY VARIOUS ACCOUNT NUMBERS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FY 2018/19 ADOPTED BUDGET. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council approve the continued citywide procurement of gasoline and diesel fuel from Southern Counties Oil Company dba SC Fuels funded by various account numbers in accordance with the FY 2018/19 Adopted Budget. BACKGROUND: The City has utilized The Cooperative Purchasing Network (TCPN) cooperative agreement for the procurement of gasoline and diesel fuel from SC Fuels for the past six (6) years. The agreement was not renewed and there was no new award made. SC Fuels does not have any other open cooperative agreements or contracts with other municipalities that the City could potentially piggyback off of. They have, however, agreed to hold the original pricing that the City was receiving from the TCPN agreement on a month to month basis while research is being conducted to locate the most advantageous method of procurement for gasoline and diesel fuel for the City. ANALYSIS: The Procurement Division is actively searching for a new method of procurement, including other cooperative contracts and piggyback opportunities that would offer the best value to the City due to the volume procured. Therefore, staff recommends that the City Council authorize procuring gasoline and diesel fuel from SC Fuels based on their offer to hold pricing on a month to month basis. FISCAL IMPACT: The amount spent for gasoline and diesel fuel in FY 2017/18 citywide was $697,147.00. There would be no fiscal impact beyond that which has already been budgeted in the FY 2018/19 Adopted Budget. Continuing to procure fuel from SC fuels offers the best option to the City as they have agreed to honor the same price on a month to month basis. Page 244 COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Continuing to procure gasoline and diesel fuel from SC Fuels gives the Procurement Division an opportunity to find a procurement scenario that will offer the best value with the most advantageous pricing for the City. Locating a cooperative agreement or piggyback opportunity would link to the Council goal of Mid and Long Range Planning as a consistent, more stable fuel rate would be offered for the term of the agreement and provide staff the ability to accurately plan their budgets without having to consider the volatile cost of fuel. Page 245 DATE: August 15, 2018 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Trina Valdez, Management Analyst I SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENT NO. 011 AUTHORIZING AN INCREASE TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH INTERNATIONAL LINE BUILDERS, INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF $23,770 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018/19 AND AUTHORIZING AN APPROPRIATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $23,770 FROM THE MUNICIPAL UTILITY FUND FOR STREET LIGHT AND CABLING IMPROVEMENTS LOCATED AT ARROW ROUTE AND YELLOWWOOD PLACE. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council approve Amendment No. 011 authorizing an increase in the amount of $23,770 to the Professional Services Agreement (C0#1 2-075) for Fiscal Year 2018/19 with International Line Builders and to appropriate funds in the amount of $23,770 to Account 1705303-5309 (Contract Services/Electric Utility) from the Municipal Utility Fund (Fund 705). BACKGROUND: In 2012, the City of Rancho Cucamonga and International Line Builders, Inc. entered into a Professional Services Agreement (CO#12-075) to provide maintenance and operations, including but not limited to installation, removal and maintenance of underground distribution facilities and all electrical related equipment of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility substation and infrastructure. ANALYSIS: To accommodate the new street improvements requirements, the installation of new streetlights including wiring, cabling and street light installation is required for the development located at Arrow Route and Yellowwood Place. The improvements will be paid for by the developers. FISCAL IMPACT: An appropriation in the amount of $23,770 from the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility Fund (Fund 705) to Account No. 1705303-5309 (Contract Services/Electric Utility) is required to fully fund the project. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: The installation of the new streetlights will address the Council's Goal of improving Public Safety by providing new roadway lighting on Arrow Route and Yellowwood Place. ATTACHMENTS: Page 246 Description Attachment No. 1 -Amendment No. 11 Page 247 AMENDMENT NO. 011 to Professional Services Agreement (CO # 12-075) between International Line Builders, Inc. (hereinafter "Consultant") and City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter the "City") This Amendment No. 011 will serve to amend the Professional Services Agreement (hereinafter "Agreement"), CO# 12-075, to incorporate the following: Modify contract amount to increase by $23,770.00 to complete necessary street light and cabling improvements for Arrow Route and Yellow Wood. All other Terms and Conditions of the original Agreement CO#12-075, will remain in full effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties, through their respective authorized representatives, have executed this Amendment by way of signature by both parties and on the date indicated below. Please return two (2) original signed copies to the City no later than July 26, 2018. The City will process both copies for signature and provide Consultant with one (1) fully executed copy of tjAmenent. Inteine BuildIn Inc. City of Rancho Cucamonga By: --zo3-e By: Name Date Name Date President Title Title /a-m!4e e-�-203-8 By: Date Name Date Operations Manager Title (two signatures required if corporation) Last Revised: 09/28/2012 Title Page I of 1 ATTAC H M4F DATE: August 15, 2018 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Trina Valdez, Management Analyst I SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH MAGELLAN ADVISORS, LLC IN THE AMOUNT OF $250,000 FOR FIBER MASTER PLAN CONSULTATION SERVICES AND NETWORK DESIGN EXPANSION, AUTHORIZE AN APPROPRIATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $50,000 FROM THE FIBER OPTIC NETWORK FUND FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES AND TRANSFER FUNDS TO CONTRACT SERVICES. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council: 1. Approve and authorize the execution of a Professional Services Agreement with Magellan Advisors, LLC in the amount of $250,000; 2. Appropriate funds in the amount of $50,000 to Account 1711303-5300 from the Fiber Optic Network Fund (Fund 711); and 3. Transfer $100,000 from Account 1711303-5309 (Contract Services/Electric Utility) to Account 1711303-5300 (Contract Services). BACKGROUND: In May 2017, Magellan Advisors completed the City's Fiber Optic Broadband Master Plan in which a business plan was devised to incorporate the City's existing utility, information technology and traffic fiber conduits along with a public private partnership to provide high speed broadband gigabit service to Rancho Cucamonga. ANALYSIS: The next phase of the City's Fiber Optic Broadband Master Plan is to move into the necessary design, engineering, permitting and project/construction management phase. Given Magellan Advisor's detailed knowledge of the project and master plan, along with their qualifications and expertise in the field, it is recommended that the City continue utilizing their services as we move into this next phase. Magellan Advisors will monitor, report and provide oversight of the design, development, and implementation to ensure project scope is maintained and achieved. The consultation services will also assist with project budgeting and the procurement process of required resources and materials and provide jurisdictional reviews. Lastly, on an as needed basis, Magellan Advisors will also provide and monitor construction management related activities. Page 249 FISCAL IMPACT: An appropriation in the amount of $50,000 from the Fiber Optic Network Fund (Fund 711) to Account No. 1711303-5300 (Contract Services) is required to fully fund the project. Further, an account transfer of $100,000 from Account No. 1711303-5309 (Contract Services/Electric Utility) to Account No. 1711303- 5300 (Contract Services) is needed to place the project funding in the correct line item. IS THIS GOING TO CAUSE A PROBLEM OR RED FLAG WITH THE FOLKS FROM CHARTER??? COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: The implementation of the Fiber Optics Master Plan will enhance the City's position as the premier community in our region. ATTACHMENTS: Description Attachment 1 PSA Page 250 AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of 2018, by and between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation ("City") and Magellan Advisors, LLC, a limited liability company ("Consultant"). RECITALS A. City has heretofore issued its request for proposals to perform the following professional services: Fiber Master Plan Consultation Services and Network Design Expansion ("the Project"). B. Consultant has submitted a proposal to perform the professional services described in Recital "A", above, necessary to complete the Project. C. City desires to engage Consultant to complete the Project in the manner set forth and more fully described herein. D. Consultant represents that it is fully qualified and licensed under the laws of the State of California to perform the services contemplated by this Agreement in a good and professional manner. AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of performance by the parties of the mutual promises, covenants, and conditions herein contained, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Consultant's Services. 1.1 Scope and Level of Services. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement, City hereby engages Consultant to perform all technical and professional services described in Recitals "A" and `B" above, including, but not limited to project management, design, engineering and construction management, all as more fully set forth in the Consultant's proposal, dated July 2, 2018 and entitled "Scope of Work", attached hereto as Exhibit "A", and incorporated by reference herein. The nature, scope, and level of the services required to be performed by Consultant are set forth in the Scope of Work and are referred to herein as "the Services." In the event of any inconsistencies between the Scope of Work and this Agreement, the terms and provisions of this Agreement shall control. 1.2 Revisions to Scope of Work. Upon request of the City, the Consultant will promptly meet with City staff to discuss any revisions to the Project PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (non -design) Last Revised: 10/02/13 Vendor Initials Page 1 Page 251 desired by the City. Consultant agrees that the Scope of Work may be amended based upon said meetings, and, by amendment to this Agreement, the parties may agree on a revision or revisions to Consultant's compensation based thereon. A revision pursuant to this Section that does not increase the total cost payable to Consultant by more than ten percent (10%) of the total compensation specified in Section 3, may be approved in writing by City's City Manager without amendment. 1.3 Time for Performance. Consultant shall perform all services under this Agreement in a timely, regular basis consistent with industry standards for professional skill and care, and in accordance with any schedule of performance set forth in the Scope of Work, or as set forth in a "Schedule of Performance", if such Schedule is attached hereto as Exhibit "A". 1.4 Standard of Care. As a material inducement to City to enter into this Agreement, Consultant hereby represents that it has the experience necessary to undertake the services to be provided. In light of such status and experience, Consultant hereby covenants that it shall follow the customary professional standards in performing the Services. 1.5 Familiarity with Services. By executing this Agreement, Consultant represents that, to the extent required by the standard of practice, Consultant (a) has investigated and considered the scope of services to be performed, (b) has carefully considered how the services should be performed, and (c) understands the facilities, difficulties and restrictions attending performance of the services under this Agreement. Consultant represents that Consultant, to the extent required by the standard of practice, has investigated any areas of work, as applicable, and is reasonably acquainted with the conditions therein. Should Consultant discover any latent or unknown conditions, which will materially affect the performance of services, Consultant shall immediately inform City of such fact and shall not proceed except at Consultant's risk until written instructions are received from the City Representative. 2. Term of Agreement. The term of this Agreement shall be two year(s) and shall become effective as of the date of the mutual execution by way of both parties signature (the "Effective Date"). No work shall be conducted; service or goods will not be provided until this Agreement has been executed and requirements have been fulfilled. Parties to this Agreement shall have the option to renew in one year(s) increments to a total of three years, unless sooner terminated as provided in Section 14 herein. Options to renew are contingent upon the City Manager's approval, subject to pricing review, and in accordance to all Terms and Conditions stated herein unless otherwise provided in writing by the City. 3. Compensation. PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (non -design) Last Revised: 10/02/13 Vendor Initials Page 2 Page 252 3.1 Compensation. City shall compensate Consultant as set forth in Exhibit A, provided, however, that full, total and complete amount payable to Consultant shall not exceed $250,000.00 per year (Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars), including all out of pocket expenses, unless additional compensation is approved by the City Manager or City Council. City shall not withhold any federal, state or other taxes, or other deductions. However, City shall withhold not more than ten percent (10%) of any invoice amount pending receipt of any deliverables reflected in such invoice. Under no circumstance shall Consultant be entitled to compensation for services not yet satisfactorily performed. The parties further agree that compensation may be adjusted in accordance with Section 1.2 to reflect subsequent changes to the Scope of Services. City shall compensate Consultant for any authorized extra services as set forth in Exhibit A. 4. Method of Payment. 4.1 Invoices. Consultant shall submit to City monthly invoices for the Services performed pursuant to this Agreement. The invoices shall describe in detail the Services rendered during the period and shall separately describe any authorized extra services. Any invoice claiming compensation for extra services shall include appropriate documentation of prior authorization of such services. All invoices shall be remitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. 4.2 City shall review such invoices and notify Consultant in writing within ten (10) business days of any disputed amounts. 4.3 City shall pay all undisputed portions of the invoice within thirty (30) calendar days after receipt of the invoice up to the not -to -exceed amounts set forth in Section 3. 4.4 All records, invoices, time cards, cost control sheets and other records maintained by Consultant relating to services hereunder shall be available for review and audit by the City. 5. Representatives. 5.1 City Representative. For the purposes of this Agreement, the contract administrator and City's representative shall be Fred Lyn, Utilities Division Manager, or such other person as designated in writing by the City ("City Representative"). It shall be Consultant's responsibility to assure that the City Representative is kept informed of the progress of the performance of the services, and Consultant shall refer any decisions that must be made by City to the City Representative. Unless otherwise specified herein, any approval of City required hereunder shall mean the approval of the City Representative. Vendor Initials PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (non -design) Page 3 Last Revised: 10/02/13 Page 253 5.2 Consultant Representative. For the purposes of this Agreement, John Honker, President and CEO is hereby designated as the principal and representative of Consultant authorized to act in its behalf with respect to the services specified herein and make all decisions in connection therewith ("Consultant's Representative"). It is expressly understood that the experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of the Consultant's Representative were a substantial inducement for City to enter into this Agreement. Therefore, the Consultant's Representative shall be responsible during the term of this Agreement for directing all activities of Consultant and devoting sufficient time to personally supervise the services hereunder. Consultant may not change the Responsible Principal without the prior written approval of City. 6. Consultant's Personnel. 6.1 All Services shall be performed by Consultant or under Consultant's direct supervision, and all personnel shall possess the qualifications, permits, and licenses required by State and local law to perform such Services, including, without limitation, a City business license as required by the City's Municipal Code. 6.2 Consultant shall be solely responsible for the satisfactory work performance of all personnel engaged in performing the Services and compliance with the standard of care set forth in Section 1.4. 6.3 Consultant shall be responsible for payment of all employees' and subcontractors' wages and benefits, and shall comply with all requirements pertaining to employer's liability, workers' compensation, unemployment insurance, and Social Security. By its execution of this Agreement, Consultant certifies that it is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code that require every employer to be insured against liability for Worker's Compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and agrees to comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the Services. 6.4 Consultant shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless City and its elected officials, officers and employees, servants, designated volunteers, and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials, from any and all liability, damages, claims, costs and expenses of any nature to the extent arising from Consultant's violations of personnel practices and/or any violation of the California Labor Code. City shall have the right to offset against the amount of any fees due to Consultant under this Agreement any amount due to City from Consultant as a result of Consultant's failure to promptly pay to City any reimbursement or indemnification arising under this Section 6. 7. Ownership of Work Product. 7.1 Ownership. All documents, ideas, concepts, electronic files, drawings, photographs and any and all other writings, including drafts thereof, prepared, created or provided by Consultant in the course of performing the Services, including any and all intellectual and proprietary rights arising from the creation of the same PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (non -design) Last Revised: 10/02/13 Vendor Initials Page 4 Page 254 (collectively, "Work Product"), are considered to be "works made for hire" for the benefit of the City. Upon payment being made, and provided Consultant is not in breach of this Agreement, all Work Product shall be and remain the property of City without restriction or limitation upon its use or dissemination by City. Basic survey notes, sketches, charts, computations and similar data prepared or obtained by Consultant under this Agreement shall, upon request, be made available to City. None of the Work Product shall be the subject of any common law or statutory copyright or copyright application by Consultant. In the event of the return of any of the Work Product to Consultant or its representative, Consultant shall be responsible for its safe return to City. Under no circumstances shall Consultant fail to deliver any draft or final designs, plans, drawings, reports or specifications to City upon written demand by City for their delivery, notwithstanding any disputes between Consultant and City concerning payment, performance of the contract, or otherwise. This covenant shall survive the termination of this Agreement. City's reuse of the Work Product for any purpose other than the Project, shall be at City's sole risk. 7.2. Assignment of Intellectual Property Interests: Upon execution of this Agreement and to the extent not otherwise conveyed to City by Section 7.1, above, the Consultant shall be deemed to grant and assign to City, and shall require all of its subcontractors to assign to City, all ownership rights, and all common law and statutory copyrights, trademarks, and other intellectual and proprietary property rights relating to the Work Product and the Project itself, and Consultant shall disclaim and retain no rights whatsoever as to any of the Work Product, to the maximum extent permitted by law. City shall be entitled to utilize the Work Product for any and all purposes, including but not limited to constructing, using, maintaining, altering, adding to, restoring, rebuilding and publicizing the Project or any aspect of the Project. 7.3 Title to Intellectual Property. Consultant warrants and represents that it has secured all necessary licenses, consents or approvals to use any instrumentality, thing or component as to which any intellectual property right exists, including computer software, used in the rendering of the Services and the production of the Work Product and/or materials produced under this Agreement, and that City has full legal title to and the right to reproduce any of the Work Product. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold City, and its elected officials, officers, employees, servants, attorneys, designated volunteers, and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials, harmless from any loss, claim or liability in any way related to a claim that City's use is violating federal, state or local laws, or any contractual provisions, relating to trade names, licenses, franchises, patents or other means of protecting intellectual property rights and/or interests in products or inventions. Consultant shall bear all costs arising from the use of patented, copyrighted, trade secret or trademarked documents, materials, software, equipment, devices or processes used or incorporated in the Services and materials produced under this Agreement. In the event City's use of any of the Work Product is held to constitute an infringement and any use thereof is enjoined, Consultant, at its expense, shall: (a) secure for City the right to continue using the Work Product by suspension of any injunction or by procuring a PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (non -design) Last Revised: 10/02/13 Vendor hnaals Page S Page 255 license or licenses for City; or (b) modify the Work Product so that it becomes non - infringing. This covenant shall survive the termination of this Agreement. 8. Status as Independent Contractor. Consultant is, and shall at all times remain as to City, a wholly independent contractor. Consultant shall have no power to incur any debt, obligation, or liability on behalf of City or otherwise act as an agent of City. Neither City nor any of its agents shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of Consultant's employees, except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall not, at any time, or in any manner, represent that it or any of its officers, agents or employees are in any manner employees of City. Consultant shall pay all required taxes on amounts paid to Consultant under this Agreement, and to defend, indemnify and hold City harmless from any and all taxes, assessments, penalties, and interest asserted against City by reason of the independent contractor relationship created by this Agreement. Consultant shall fully comply with the workers' compensation law regarding Consultant and Consultant's employees. 9. Confidentiality. Consultant may have access to financial, accounting, statistical, and personnel data of individuals and City employees. Consultant covenants that all data, documents, discussion, or other information developed or received by Consultant or provided for performance of this Agreement are confidential and shall not be disclosed by Consultant without prior written authorization by City. City shall grant such authorization if applicable law requires disclosure. All City data shall be returned to City upon the termination of this Agreement. Consultant's covenant under this Section shall survive the termination of this Agreement. This provision shall not apply to information in whatever form that is in the public domain, nor shall it restrict the Consultant from giving notices required by law or complying with an order to provide information or data when such an order is issued by a court, administrative agency or other legitimate authority, or if disclosure is otherwise permitted by law and reasonably necessary for the Consultant to defend itself from any legal action or claim. 10. Conflict of Interest. 10.1 Consultant covenants that it presently has no interest and shall not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, which may be affected by the Services, or which would conflict in any manner with the performance of the Services. Consultant further covenants that, in performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest shall be employed by it. Furthermore, Consultant shall avoid the appearance of having any interest, which would conflict in any manner with the performance of the Services. Consultant shall not accept any employment or representation during the term of this Agreement which is or may likely make Consultant "financially interested" (as provided in California Government Code §§1090 and 87100) in any decision made by City on any matter in connection with which Consultant has been retained. 10.2 Consultant further represents that it has not employed or retained any person or entity, other than a bona fide employee working exclusively for Consultant, v enaur lnmais PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (non -design) Page 6 Last Revised: 10/02/13 Page 256 to solicit or obtain this Agreement. Consultant has not paid or agreed to pay any person or entity, other than a bona fide employee working exclusively for Consultant, any fee, commission, gift, percentage, or any other consideration contingent upon the execution of this Agreement. Upon any breach or violation of this warranty, City shall have the right, at its sole and absolute discretion, to terminate this Agreement without further liability, or to deduct from any sums payable to Consultant hereunder the full amount or value of any such fee, commission, percentage or gift. 10.3 Consultant has no knowledge that any officer or employee of City has any interest, whether contractual, noncontractual, financial, proprietary, or otherwise, in this transaction or in the business of Consultant, and that if any such interest comes to the knowledge of Consultant at any time during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall immediately make a complete, written disclosure of such interest to City, even if such interest would not be deemed a prohibited "conflict of interest" under applicable laws as described in subsection 10.1. 11. Indemnification. 11.1 Professional Services. In the connection with its professional services, the Consultant shall defend, indemnify, and hold the City, and its elected officials, officers, employees, servants, volunteers, and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials, (collectively, "Indemnitees"), free and harmless with respect to any and all damages, liabilities, losses, reasonable defense costs or expenses (collectively, "Claims"), including but not limited to liability for death or injury to any person and injury to any property, to the extent the same arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Consultant or any of its officers, employees, subcontractors, consultants, or agents in the performance of its professional services under this Agreement. Consultant shall pay all reasonable defense costs and expenses, including actual attorney's fees and experts' costs incurred in connection with such defense. 11.2 Other Indemnities. In connection with all Claims not covered by Section 11. 1, and to the maximum extent permitted by law, the Consultant shall defend, hold harmless and indemnify the Indemnitees with respect to any and all Claims including but not limited to Claims relating to death or injury to any person and injury to any property, which arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the acts, omissions, activities or operations of Consultant or any of its officers, employees, subcontractors, subconsultants, or agents in the performance of this Agreement. Consultant shall defend Indemnitees in any action or actions filed in connection with any such Claims with counsel of City's choice, and shall pay all costs and expenses, including actual attorney's fees and experts' costs incurred in connection with such defense. The indemnification obligation herein shall not in any way be limited by the insurance obligations contained in this Agreement provided, however, that the Contractor shall have no obligation to indemnify for Claims arising out of the sole negligence or willful misconduct of any of the Indemnitees. Vendor Initials PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (non -design) Page 7 Last Revised: 10102113 Page 257 11.3 Nonwaiver of Rights. Indemnitees do not, and shall not, waive any rights that they may possess against Consultant because of the acceptance by City, or the deposit with City, of any insurance policy or certificate required pursuant to this Agreement. 11.4 Waiver of Right of Subrogation. Except as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement, Consultant, on behalf of itself and all parties claiming under or through it, hereby waives all rights of subrogation against the Indemnitees, while acting within the scope of their duties, from all claims, losses and liabilities arising out of or incident to activities or operations performed by or on behalf of the Consultant. 11.5 Survival. The provisions of this Section 11 shall survive the termination of the Agreement and are in addition to any other rights or remedies which Indemnitees may have under the law. Payment is not required as a condition precedent to an Indemnitee's right to recover under this indemnity provision, and an entry of judgment against Consultant shall be conclusive in favor of the Indemnitee's right to recover under this indemnity provision. 12. Insurance. 12.1 Liability Insurance. Consultant shall procure and maintain in full force and effect for the duration of this Agreement, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the services hereunder by Consultant, and/or its agents, representatives, employees and subcontractors. 12.2 Minimum Scope of Insurance. Unless otherwise approved by City, coverage shall be at least as broad as: (1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage (occurrence form CG 0001). (2) Insurance Services Office form number CA 0001 (Ed. 1/87) covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto). (3) Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of California, and Employer's Liability Insurance. (4) Professional Liability insurance in a form approved by the City, having, at City's option, an extended reporting period of not less than three (3) years; or professional liability insurance shall be maintained for a period of three (3) years after completion of the Services which shall, during the entire three (3) year period, provide protection against claims of professional negligence arising out of PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (non -design) Last Revised: 10/02/13 Vendor Initials Page 8 Page 258 less than: Consultant's performance of the Services and otherwise complying with all applicable provisions of this Section 12. The policy shall be endorsed to include contractual liability to the extent insurable. 12.3 Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no (1) Commercial General Liability: $2,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. Commercial General Liability Insurance with a general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this Agreement or the general limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. (2) Automobile Liability: $2,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage. (3) Employer's Liability: $1,000,000 per accident and in the aggregate for bodily injury or disease and Workers' Compensation Insurance in the amount required by law. (4) Professional Liability: $1,000,000 per claim/aggregate. (5) The Insurance obligations under this agreement shall be the greater of (i) the Insurance coverages and limits carried by the Contractor; or (ii) the minimum insurance requirements shown in this Agreement. Any insurance proceeds in excess of the specified limits and coverage required which are applicable to a given loss, shall be available to the City. No representation is made that the minimum insurance requirements of this Agreement are sufficient to cover the obligations of the Contractor under this Agreement. 12.4 Deductibles and Self -Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self- insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City and shall not reduce the limits of coverage. City reserves the right to obtain a full certified copy of any required insurance policy and endorsements. 12.5 Other Insurance Provisions. (1) The commercial general liability and automobile liability policies are to contain the following provisions on a separate additionally insured endorsement naming the City, its officers, officials, employees, designated volunteers and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (non -design) Last Revised: 10/02/13 Vendor Initials Page 9 Page 259 City officials as additional insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of Consultant; products and completed operations of Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by Consultant; and/or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by Consultant. The coverage shall contain no limitations on the scope of protection afforded to City, its officers, officials, employees, designated volunteers or agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials which are not also limitations applicable to the named insured. (2) For any claims related to this Agreement, Consultant's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects City, its officers, officials, employees, designated volunteers and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City or officials. Any insurance or self- insurance maintained by City, its officers, officials, employees, designated volunteers or agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials shall be excess of Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute with it. (3) Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. (4) Contractor shall provide immediate written notice if (1) any of the required insurance policies is terminated; (2) the limits of any of the required polices are reduced; (3) or the deductible or self insured retention is increased. In the event of any cancellation or reduction in coverage or limits of any insurance, Contractor shall forthwith obtain and submit proof of substitute insurance. Should Contractor fail to immediately procure other insurance, as specified, to substitute for any canceled policy, the City may procure such insurance at Contractor's sole cost and expense. (5) Each insurance policy, required by this clause shall expressly waive the insurer's right of subrogation against City and its elected officials, officers, employees, servants, attorneys, designated volunteers, and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials. PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (non -design) Last Revised: 10/02113 v enuur lnutats Page 10 Page 260 (6) Each policy shall be issued by an insurance company approved in writing by City, which is admitted and licensed to do business in the State of California and which is rated A:VII or better according to the most recent A.M. Best Co. Rating Guide. (7) Each policy shall specify that any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the required policy, including breaches of warranty, shall not affect the coverage required to be provided. (8) Each policy shall specify that any and all costs of adjusting and/or defending any claim against any insured, including court costs and attorneys' fees, shall be paid in addition to and shall not deplete any policy limits. (9) Contractor shall provide any and all other required insurance, endorsements, or exclusions as required by the City in any request for proposals applicable to this Agreement. 12.6 Evidence of coverage. Prior to commencing performance under this Agreement, the Consultant shall furnish the City with certificates and original endorsements, or copies of each required policy, effecting and evidencing the insurance coverage required by this Agreement including (1) Additional Insured Endorsement(s), (2) Worker's Compensation waiver of subrogation endorsement, and (3) General liability declarations or endorsement page listing all policy endorsements. The endorsements shall be signed by a person authorized by the insurer(s) to bind coverage on its behalf. All endorsements or policies shall be received and approved by the City before Consultant commences performance. If performance of this Agreement shall extend beyond one year, Consultant shall provide City with the required policies or endorsements evidencing renewal of the required policies of insurance prior to the expiration of any required policies of insurance. 12.7 Contractor agrees to include in all contracts with all subcontractors performing work pursuant to this Agreement, the same requirements and provisions of this Agreement including the indemnity and insurance requirements to the extent they apply to the scope of any such subcontractor's work. Contractor shall require its subcontractors to be bound to Contractor and City in the same manner and to the same extent as Contractor is bound to City pursuant to this Agreement, and to require each of its subcontractors to include these same provisions in its contract with any sub - subcontractor. 13. Cooperation. In the event any claim or action is brought against City relating to Consultant's performance or services rendered under this Agreement, Consultant shall render any reasonable assistance and cooperation that City might require. City shall compensate Consultant for any litigation support services in an amount to be agreed upon by the parties. ilendor Initials PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (non -design) Page 11 Last Revised: 10102113 Page 261 14. Termination. City shall have the right to terminate this Agreement at any time for any or no reason on not less than ten (10) days prior written notice to Consultant. In the event City exercises its right to terminate this Agreement, City shall pay Consultant for any services satisfactorily rendered prior to the effective date of the termination, provided Consultant is not then in breach of this Agreement. Consultant shall have no other claim against City by reason of such termination, including any claim for compensation. City may terminate for cause following a default remaining uncured more than five (5) business days after service of a notice to cure on the breaching party. Consultant may terminate this Agreement for cause upon giving the City ten (10) business days prior written notice for any of the following: (1) uncured breach by the City of any material term of this Agreement, including but not limited to Payment Terms; (2) material changes in the conditions under which this Agreement was entered into, coupled with the failure of the parties to reach accord on the fees and charges for any Additional Services required because of such changes. 15. Notices. Any notices, bills, invoices, or reports authorized or required by this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed received on (a) the day of delivery if delivered by hand or overnight courier service during Consultant's and City's regular business hours; or (b) on the third business day following deposit in the United States mail, postage prepaid, to the addresses set forth in this Section, or to such other addresses as the parties may, from time to time, designate in writing pursuant to the provisions of this Section. All notices shall be addressed as follows: If to City: Fred Lyn, Utilities Division Manager City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 If to Consultant: John Honker, President and CEO Magellan Advisors, LLC 999 18th Street, Suite 3000 Denver, CO 80202 16. Non -Discrimination and Equal Employment Opportunity. In the performance of this Agreement, Consultant shall not discriminate against any employee, subcontractor, or applicant for employment because of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin, ancestry, age, physical or mental handicap, medical condition, or sexual orientation. Consultant will take affirmative action to ensure that subcontractors and applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment, without regard to their race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin, ancestry, age, physical or mental handicap, medical condition, or sexual orientation. Vendor Initials PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (non -design) Page 12 Last Revised: 10/02/13 Page 262 17. Assignment and Subcontracting. Consultant shall not assign or transfer any interest in this Agreement or subcontract the performance of any of Consultant's obligations hereunder without City's prior written consent. Except as provided herein, any attempt by Consultant to so assign, transfer, or subcontract any rights, duties, or obligations arising hereunder shall be null, void and of no effect. 18 Compliance with Laws. Consultant shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, ordinances, codes and regulations in force at the time Consultant performs the Services. CONSULTANT is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Section 1720, et seq., and 1770, et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000, et seq., ("Prevailing Wage Laws"), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on "public works" and "maintenance" projects. If the Services are being performed as part of an applicable "public works" or "maintenance" project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, and if the total compensation is $1,000 or more, CONSULTANT agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws. The applicable prevailing wage rate determinations can be found at httu://www.dir.ca.gov/dlsr/DPreWaReDetermination.htm CONSULTANT shall make copies of the prevailing rates of per diem wages for each craft, classification or type of worker needed to execute the Services available to interested parties upon request, and shall post copies at the Consultant's principal place of business and at the Project site. CONSULTANT shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its elected officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws. 19. Non -Waiver of Terms, Rights and Remedies. Waiver by either party of any one or more of the conditions of performance under this Agreement shall not be a waiver of any other condition of performance under this Agreement. In no event shall the making by City of any payment to Consultant constitute or be construed as a waiver by City of any breach of covenant, or any default which may then exist on the part of Consultant, and the making of any such payment by City shall in no way impair or prejudice any right or remedy available to City with regard to such breach or default. 20. Attorney's Fees. In the event that either party to this Agreement shall commence any legal action or proceeding to enforce or interpret the provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party in such action or proceeding shall be entitled to recover its costs of suit, including reasonable attorney's fees and costs of experts. 21. Exhibits; Precedence. All documents referenced as exhibits in this Agreement are hereby incorporated in this Agreement. In the event of any material discrepancy between the express provisions of this Agreement and the provisions of any document incorporated herein by reference, the provisions of this Agreement shall prevail. PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (non -design) Last Revised: 10/02/13 Vendor Initials Page 13 Page 263 22. Applicable Law and Venue. The validity, interpretation, and performance of this Agreement shall be controlled by and construed under the laws of the State of California. Venue for any action relating to this Agreement shall be in the San Bernardino County Superior Court. 23. Construction. In the event of any asserted ambiguity in, or dispute regarding the interpretation of any matter herein, the interpretation of this Agreement shall not be resolved by any rules of interpretation providing for interpretation against the party who causes the uncertainty to exist or against the party who drafted the Agreement or who drafted that portion of the Agreement. 24. Entire Agreement. This Agreement consists of this document, and any other documents, attachments and/or exhibits referenced herein and attached hereto, each of which is incorporated herein by such reference, and the same represents the entire and integrated agreement between Consultant and City. This Agreement supersedes all prior oral or written negotiations, representations or agreements. This Agreement may not be amended, nor any provision or breach hereof waived, except in a writing signed by the parties which expressly refers to this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties, through their respective authorized representatives, have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above. Consultant Name: Magellan isors, LLC 13y- 16ate Pr, 4l�i� Title Name Date Title (two signatures required if corporation) PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (non -design) Last Revised: 10/02/13 City of Rancho Cucamonga By: Name Date Title City of Rancho Cucamonga By: Name Date Title Vendor Initials Page 14 Page 264 Magellan ADV/SORB 74fARr www.magellan-advisors.com Proposal Owner's Rep, Project Management, and As Needed Des ign/Engi, veering/Permittin.g and AsBuilt Services_- = Prepared For The City of Rancho Cucamo a • n yRCMUFiber - J . A% - •z• •_ D FrL Lyrr _ .� Utilities Division Manager ► i=*�r: ,. Prepared BY b Niolette C,'� . r Mlan Advis1*7 ors' _ 0:386.931.3520 E: Cviolette@magellan advi;or,Nm r K www.magellan-advisors.com 99918th Street, Suite 3000 - -- +r "Wil+ •I i�M • ! Denver, CO 80202 � -W or .IIS PIZ I % �.• \ WWI I Ad Cover Letter July 2, 2018 Fred Lyn, Utilities Division Manager Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility— RCMU Fiber 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Fred, As the City of Rancho Cucamonga moves forward bringing RCMU Fiber online, and in executing its partnership with Inyo Networks, it will require the technical, financial, business, and strategy assistance of its partner, Magellan Advisors. Magellan is prepared to continue its relationship with the City of Rancho Cucamonga and RCMU Fiber, the City's newest utility. Rancho Cucamonga is taking bold moves to bring next -generation broadband services to the community, investing in fiber-optic networks, smart street lighting systems, and data center facilities, which will enable the City of Rancho Cucamonga to be one of the most connected, digitally capable cities in the United States. Over the next several months RCMU Fiber will be moving into critical stages of standing up the utility, expanding its fiber infrastructure, and turning up its new data center, and network equipment. In addition, it will have to navigate its new relationship with Inyo, ensuring they understand, plan for, and meet specific sales goals aimed at generating the necessary revenues the City requires to fund the utility's operation, and expansion. In addition, RCMU Fiber will need strict oversight, and regular management of the utility's fiber, and its partnership with Inyo. Magellan will prepare regular financial reports, and participate in necessary meetings, and teleconferences as it relates to the financial requirements of RCMU Fiber. We will oversee, manage, and recommend for approval/denial, all requests made by Inyo to connect customers. RCMU Fiber will have to manage its cost structures carefully as it deploys fiber and connects customers to the network. Magellan will ensure that all expenses match the RCMU Fiber business plan and financial models, with an eye toward long- term sustainability, providing regular monthly reports of key RCMU Fiber project metrics to the City. Finally, Magellan proposes to function as RCMU Fiber's "Broadband Manager" ensuring adherence to the City's vision, and Fiber Master Plan, while at the same time providing the necessary oversight to ensure the City's P3 is executed as intended, and that its partners are living up to the spirit of the P3 agreement, and most importantly, that they are exceeding the City's expectations. Our team will bring the necessary knowledge to the RCMU Fiber leadership team, that will ensure the Utility brings the maximum value to the Rancho Cucamonga community. If you have any questions or we can be of assistance in any way, please feel free to contact me with any questions or comments. You can reach me directly -Courtney Violette. COO, Magellan Advisors - 0: 386.931.3520 E: cviolette@magellan-advisors.com Overview of Magellan Advisors Magellan Advisors, LLC is a Colorado -based firm with local offices in Denver, Los Angeles, and Miami Florida. Magellan's primary address is 999 181h Street, Suite 3000 Denver, CO 80202. Magellan Advisors, LLC was founded in January of 2004 and has been in operation as a Limited Liability Company since inception. We are a Florida Small Business Enterprise based out of Denver, Colorado. Magellan's office number is 888.960.5299. Magellan provides leading broadband, smart city, information technology and security consulting services to public and private organizations. We are a full spectrum planning and implementation firm that brings together technology, communications and utility consulting to create smart gigabit cities of tomorrow. Our professionals bring years of experience from the broadband, telecom, information technology and government sectors. We are thought leaders and real-world implementers of broadband and smart city networks that keep communities competitive in the digital world. Unlike most consulting firms, we partner with our clients every step of the way, whether they are deploying institutional fiber networks, developing broadband public-private partnerships or deploying smart city networks. We are a "hands-on" firm with strong project management abilities and implementation skills to see our client's projects through from concept to completion. We are only successful when our clients are successful. Our goal is to deliver practical broadband and technology solutions that our clients can implement in their communities. Through our services, over $1 billion of new fiber investments have been made connecting more than 1,000 schools, hospitals, libraries and governments and passing nearly 1 million homes with fiber. Mary�ellan `ADVISORS 44 r O O 4i MAGELLAN DEVELOPES UBIQUITOUS FIBER + WIRELESS INFRASTRUCTURE THAT POWERS THE SMART CITY BROADBAND UTILITIES TRANSPORTATION HEALTHCARE PUBLIC SAFETY FiberToTheHome Smart Grid Intelligent Traffic Systems Telehealth Video Surveillance Middle-Milehletworks Smart HomeAutomation Vehicle Detection Telemedicine Sensor Networks High-SpeedWreless GridSecurity Smart Parking Remote Monitoring Secure Communications Cellular&DAS Energy Efficiency EVChargirig Records Management EmergencyOperrations wwwrnaaellan-advisorsrom Magellan Serves Over 400 Local Government Organizations POW Mal rro.w ..: 1• ✓ 11:� !/ lQOALE oDw• eowpry Cite of Lo d r 0 07 'y Broadband i Harni[toa- :ber ,entennial -_�.�.-�..r.r---- - conrxecUng yLw •, c •. � 1. � c , �u •. • r VUMA t`=� Waverly ; 11���, x �1/''�'i�,.�. � • I_:11CI:I.:tN1 � f tt1 \' f FtS I n F SALT RIVER PROJECT 01- - _ Ztlpav LM01B .. APPA l A'i NIAti , P I U � %MOF Co�yof �L �i A CarlSbad COLUMBIA My _ i1CtiL iJ CjNewBramfels 1A 'INTER HAVEN nw Cwwa of LAAirr City LEq T` • Broadband & Smart City • Pro Forma Development • Fiber To The Home Feasibility Studies • Economic Modeling • Metro Networks • Policy Development • Private Funding Options • Long -Haul Networks • Public -Private • Public Funding Options • Wireless & WiFi Partnerships • Due Diligence • Distributed Antenna • New Market • Deal Structuring Systems Development • Publio-Private • GPON, DWOM, Ethernet • Business & Economic Partnerships Models • Market Assessments • IT Strategic Plans • Standards & • BWOSS Development • ITGovemance Specifications • Integration • Network, Computing & • Vendor Selection • Network Management Storage • EPC Contractor • Business Process • Virtualitation Management Optimization • Security Consulting, PCI • Construction • Expansion Planning Compliance Management • SCADA & Utility IT • Network Integration Our combination of unmatched broadband, telecom, business and operational experience creates actionable strategies that communities use to realize their broadband and smart city objectives. We have led the planning, funding, construction and management of over 50 fiber to the premise networks passing over 1 million homes and connecting more than 1,000 schools, hospitals, government offices and community organizations. Our work has resulted in over $1 billion in new broadband investments nationwide. Magellan has helped more communities successfully plan, implement and manage gigabit broadband networks than any other firm in the market. 888.960.5299 www.ma ell n -ad i Portfolio of Services Magellan is the only firm that provides comprehensive broadband planning, implementation and project management services, enabling our clients with a turnkey consulting partner that helps them through every step of the process. Our project teams are comprised of professionals with significant operational experience in the broadband, public utility, local government, smart city and information technology sectors. Unlike many consulting firms, we have deep business and operational expertise planning, building and managing networks, skills that are paramount to helping our clients plan and implement their own broadband networks and smart city initiatives by creating effective internal and external partnerships. Our consultants develop real-world, actionable strategies that organizations can rely on to support the development of their broadband and smart city initiatives. No other firm in the industry has these combined capabilities. Magellan uses a customized approach in every project based on the needs of our clients and their communities. We develop innovative solutions that allow public and private organizations to best utilize their strengths to expand broadband and develop smart city applications. Magellan is at the forefront of public-private partnership development, working to negotiate and forge these partnerships between public organizations and private broadband providers. Conquering broadband issues often takes the participation of multiple parties that are aligned around common goals. Magellan helps communities recruit innovative providers and form strategic partnerships that benefit providers and the communities they serve. Magellan also provides strategic plans with blueprints for cities to build, expand and operate their municipal fiber networks should they chose to do so. Feasibility Studies Magellan helps public organizations and broadband operators determine reasonable expectations for deploying fiber to the premise networks. We develop comprehensive feasibility studies that assess the current broadband environment and determine the opportunities to deploy advanced broadband networks. Our feasibility studies are real world tested and based on the latest broadband industry trends that provide strategic direction for communities to achieve their broadband and smart city goals. • Community Needs Assessments • Market Analysis & Current Environment • Network Analysis & Inventory Broadband Engineering • Business Models & Financial Planning • Design & Engineering • Opportunity, Risk & Benefit Analysis Our broadband design and engineering services provide the latest technical designs for fiber -to -the - premise, backbone, metro and long-haul networks. Our wireless design and engineering services develop effective fixed wireless, microwave and WiFi networks to cover the most challenging terrain. Our services cover all aspects of broadband design and engineering, from outside plant fiber and wireless, to equipment, to services and content, to BSS/OSS and systems integration. • FTTH, FTTP, Metro & Long -Haul Fiber • Fixed Wireless, Microwave & WiFi • GPON, Active Ethernet & WDM • Routing, Switching & MPLS • Internet, Voice & Video Integration • BSS/OSS & Network Management Systems 988.960.5299 �'YVIAIW i ,t -ma Alan-adviux r i 6 Business Models & Partnerships Magellan is on the forefront of emerging business models and partnership development within the broadband industry. We successfully plan, negotiate and execute partnership agreements between public organizations and private operators, leveraging the strengths of each organization to benefit the community. We have a stellar record of recruiting broadband providers to local communities and helping these organizations make their communities Gigabit Ready. • Dark Fiber, Open Access, Triple Play • Feasibility Analysis of Business Models • Public -Private Partnership Development Financing & Grants • Partner Recruitment & RFQs • Advocacy & Negotiation in Partnerships • Opportunity, Risk & Benefit Analysis Magellan provides extensive financial planning services for organizations looking to invest in advanced broadband networks. Our extensive financial plans help government organizations and private operators understand the opportunities and risks and the most feasible financial strategies to achieve their goals. Our plans are investment ready and are routinely used to support funding with bond underwriters, banks, private equity firms and grant programs. Magellan also maintains a portfolio of financing partners and grant programs that we bring to communities to help them acquire funding. • Investment -Ready Financial Plans • Funding Development • Partner Recruitment Project Management • Broadband Grant Writing & Management • FCC, E -Rate, CAF & State Programs • Economic Development Grant Programs Magellan helps operators, utilities and government organizations implement next -generation networks and smart city initiatives. We provide turnkey project management services that enable these organizations to maintain resources that cover every aspect of deploying broadband networks, from fiber and wireless network deployment, to equipment and content integration, to marketing and sales, to operations and management. Magellan provides the only turnkey solution that enables these organizations to deploy their networks in a timely manner and launch their networks with the confidence to achieve the best results in their communities. • Procurement & Contract Negotiation • Construction Management • Network Commissioning & Certification Policy Development • Content Acquisition & Agreements • Sales, Marketing & Business Development • Business & Operations Management Magellan maintains knowledge of best practice in policy development and organizational structure for implementing and operating broadband networks and smart city initiatives. We help municipalities and utilities organize and refine internal business processes for improved communications, project management, financial management and policy development. We provide our clients a knowledgebase of zoning, right of way management and wireless policies for enabling and facilitating the development of Manellanjkj ADVISORS VJW broadband . O - broadband infrastructures and smart city initiatives. Our recommendations generate business processes and workflows that improve internal and external partnerships for streamlining ongoing expansion of broadband and smart city deployments. • Right of Way Management Ordinance • Wireless Ordinance & Guidelines • Fiber Ordinance & Guidelines Owner's Representative Dig Once & Joint Trench Policies Telecommunications Master Funding Internal & External Working Groups The Owner's Rep ensure the owner's or tenant's best interests are at the heart of every decision made. Owners/Tenants with limited knowledge of design, construction, phasing and sequencing hire an Owner's Rep to represent their interests and be the liaison between the stakeholders, design team, ISP/OSP, contractors, and client vendors back to the owner. • Monitor (not manage) Projects/Programs • Procurement Processes • Design, Development and Implementation • Jurisdictional Reviews • Project/Program Budgets • Internal & External Working Groups • Risk Mitigation and First Line Report • Construction Related Activities • Project Execution through Close -Out Additional Services Magellan provides a wide range of supplementary services in information technology and security, smart city planning and networking technology fields. Many of our services complement one another, allowing Magellan to provide a one -stop -shop for our clients' full range of broadband, smart city, IT and security needs. Magellan's experts lead the industry in planning and deploying the latest technology solutions to meet a wide range of business needs. As the Internet of Things transitions from concept to reality, Magellan helps its clients adapt to the rapidly changing world and prepare communities to thrive in the digital domain. Information Technology • Utility Security & SCADA Consulting Smart City Consulting • PCI Compliance & Implementation Public Safety CAS Consulting • Information Security Consulting Bios Courtnev Violette. COO — Proiect Executive Courtney has led dozens of municipal broadband planning and implementation projects across the country. He is a Certified Fiber -To -The -Home Professional and holds a number of technical certifications in broadband, information technology and information security. Prior to joining Magellan, he spent 6 years as the CIO for the City of Palm Coast. During this time, he planned and built the first true City -owned open - access network in the Southeast. Through his leadership, the network grew to serve government, business, education and healthcare needs across the City, saving these organizations millions of dollars and providing gigabit connectivity to meet the community's needs. Courtney holds a MA in Information Technology Management and a BS in Computer Science from Webster University. Tim Scott, Senior Consultant — Owner's Ren PM Tim has an international, broad and diverse background across nearly 20 years of experience in the telecommunications and broadband markets. Well known across the fiber industry, Tim has spoken at various industry events sharing his passion and knowledge related to the benefits fiber infrastructure can bring to local communities. Tim enjoys engaging with local governments, finding a balance between the interests of public and private sectors, and then defining these through Public Private Partnership engagements. Tim has a sound business and technology understanding with both product, operations, and carrier experiences across various broadband network engagements that include both the private and public sectors. Rodney Martin, Broadband Proiect Manager — Proiect Manager Rodney Martin is a seasoned Project Manager PMP with over 18 years of experience leading complex multi -million -dollar projects. Rodney has lead projects for multiple Fortune 500, IT and Telecommunications companies in the areas of infrastructure and security related software roll out. Prior to joining Magellan Advisors, he served in multiple positions for Google Fiber including Regional Operations Manager where he Managed Operations Team in 5 metro markets including RDU, CLT, BNA, ATL and SD, and OSP Construction Manager where he supported the metro Project Manager to manage the construction of Google Fiber metro FTTH/PON network within budget, schedule and constraints. Rodney holds a BS in Technical Management from DeVry University, his PMP certification and numerous other certifications in the area of training, management engineering and Information Technology and Security - - Mark Lane, Senior Technical Consultant —Networks and Services Mark Lane has over 30 years of experience in enterprise IT, carrier network operations, and technology consulting. While serving as CTO for Bristol Virginia Utilities OpuNet, he helped provide the strategic direction and practical implementation responsible for ` their fiber -to -the -premise (FTTP) network build- out and broadband service deployment for eight counties in Southwest VA. His vision and leadership contributed to Bristol VA being selected as an Intelligent Community Forum Top 7 Intelligent City in 2009. Mark received a bachelor's in computer science from the University of Tennessee. Dan Howick, VP Design and Construction — Design, Permit, Construction Management Dan Howick has over 20 years of experience working in the planning, layout and design of telecommunications networks, specializing in fiber -optics. He works hand-in-hand with some of the nation's largest service providers who rely on his reputation and industry knowledge to help design and install advanced fiber-optic systems throughout the country. Dan's expertise in the telecommunications industry focuses on fiber-optic networks in both the inside and outside plant environments. His - responsibilities have included the layout, and design of outside plant networks for carriers, the United States Government, local municipalities, and private networks. Dan excels in the areas of route planning and optimization, as -built recording and development, plant verification and documentation, and AutoCAD layout for both plan and profile views for construction. Dan also has extensive experience in best practices, methods and procedures for design/installation in fiber -optics including terminations, splicing and testing. Sherry McCuller, Senior Broadband Consultant - Financials Ms. McCuller is a seasoned executive with "C" level experience in the investment banking, software development, management consulting and broadband communications industries. For over seventeen years, she has engaged in research, planning, outreach, fundraising, design, deployment and management of advanced broadband communications systems for public, nonprofit, cooperative, and public/private ventures. Her work has resulted in many innovative "first of its kind" ventures recognized as outstanding models of innovation and collaboration and best practices for sustainable deployment. Ms. McCuller serves as a member of the Board of Directors of SEATOA. Statement of Work Magellan proposes to function as the RCMU Fiber Owner's Representative, and in fulfillment of all necessary design/engineering/permitting, and Project Management/Construction Management requirements. Magellan will dedicate experienced resources to oversee the buildout and expansion of RCMU Fiber, as well as oversight of RCMU Fiber's P3 partner, Inyo Networks. Task 1: Owner's Representative of RCMU Fiber As Owner's Rep., Magellan will ensure that the City of Rancho Cucamonga's and RCMU Fiber's best interests are at the heart of every decision made during the operation and expansion of the Utility. Magellan will provide experienced team members who specialize in management of design, construction, phasing and sequencing of the network expansion. Magellan will represent RCMU Fiber's interests and be the liaison between the stakeholders, design teams, ISP/OSP, contractors, and client vendors back to the owner. Our team will monitor, report and provide oversight of: (1) the design, development, implementation process to ensure project scope is achieved; (2) the overall project budget; (3) the procurement process to include procurement of resources and materials; (4) assist with jurisdictional reviews and project related mitigation issues; (5) monitor construction related activities, and, (6) oversee from initial execution through monitor/control to close-out. Additionally, our consulting team will interface with Inyo Networks weekly, communicating the City's/RCMU Fiber's goals, and expectations, while ensuring adherence to the City's Fiber Master Plan, and more specifically the City's intent of the deployment of RCMU Fiber. Magellan will provide bi- weekly/monthly reports to RCMU Fiber, and will provide subscriber/revenue forecasts, that are aligned with Inyo's sales goals, and actuals. Finally, our team will manage all expenses related to RCMU Fiber, ensuring compliance with the RCMU Fiber financial models, including OPEX, and CAPER. Magellan will provide regular updates to the RCMU Fiber financial models, and will include all key financial metrics in regular reporting. In an Owner's Rep function, Magellan will execute the RCMU Fiber project, standing the utility up, and managing the performance of the Utility, and the partnership with Inyo as the City's Broadband Manager. In this role, Magellan will bring its expert management, strategic, and financial consulting services to manage this very important new venture on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Task 1: Task Costs and Timelines Consulting Services: $90,000 ($7,500/month) 50 hr month @ $150 Expenses: Billed as incurred — no markup Timeline: 112 Months beginning July 1, 2018 Task 2: Network Implementation and Project Management/Construction Management Services Magellan's staff will provide network implementation and oversight for the City of Rancho Cucamonga as it executes on the implementation of the Fiber Master Plan. During this initial network development phase, and implementation of the City's Broadband Infrastructure Program, Magellan will oversee all RFP and procurements for the components, equipment and professional services. We will oversee negotiations of network interconnects, wholesale capacity and other telecom services as required along with development of agreements and other contractual language. The tasks for network implementation and oversight include: Network Implementation and Project Management a) Provide overall project management, quality control, and quality assurance of tasks from network design through completion of construction and partner integration. b) Maintain detailed project implementation plan to track all necessary steps to implement and to stand up network services, and for expansion. c) Manage the remaining procurement process to include, storage of materials, distribution, and installation of ISP infrastructure and ancillary supply items. d) Perform phase completion close out to include compiling network documentation configurations, e.g., device addresses identification codes locations serial numbers in IP addressable systems, relevant rack elevation data, equipment warranty information. Review and submit equipment test results, As -build/ Redline drawings with labeling convention. e) Ensure spare parts and equipment process is established in RMA process f) Review each SoW to develop punch list (clean up Items) after each phase completion g) Coordinate end user training as required, finalizing and submitting O&M manual package. h) Coordination of phase complete site walks to include Data center, ODCs and ROW construction of OSP network elements. Costs and Timelines Project Management $108,000 ($9,000/month) 60hr month @ $150 Expenses: No Expenses per Contract Timeline: 12 Months beginning July 1, 2018 8889oo Qk Optional Tasks Task 3: As Needed Network Design/Engineering/ Permitting, and As Built Services Magellan Advisors will provide all necessary design, engineering and permitting services to RCMU Fiber as it expands its network —on an as needed basis. 1) Provide PE approved (if required) formal network design and as-builts based on all approved network expansion requests/plans. 2) Provide plans and associated cost estimates to the City at 60%, 90%, and 100% complete. 90% and 100% should also include specifications. 3) Design will consist of single -mode fiber placed underground in existing and new proposed conduit systems. 4) Perform outside plant walkout and staking, as needed, to validate design, confirm existing utilities, and collect necessary information for permitting agencies. 5) Create base maps, which include parcels/addresses and other information needed to design the network. 6) Includes cost of independent PE certification if required by funding source. 7) Create a design and layout of fiber optic trunk line (backbone) and distribution laterals including: a) Underground path (route) determinations using the best and least expensive construction methods to allow potential network connections along said route. b) Field data collection to include, but not limited to: i) Road widths. ii) Right-of-way widths. iii) Hard points or standing structures within Right-of-ways. iv) Define size and type of fiber and conduit. V) Determine network access point and node locations. vi) Select location, type, and size of handholes (Vaults) or manholes. vii) Determine splicing, patching and termination locations. viii) Wiring limits for fiber pedestals. ix) Determine necessary fiber termination and equipment connections. 8) Establish construction methods (e.g. bore, plow, trench) and practices. 9) Provide detailed underground design using ESRI ARCGIS software. 10) Obtain all necessary permitting (e.g. Caltrans, County, City, Utility, etc.) and easements. Actual fees for permits will be paid by Rancho Cucamonga. 11) Power company coordination services. 12) Provide final As -built diagrams. 13) Develop general notes and specifications. 14) Detailed tabbing of labor and materials (project cost estimates). 15) Detailed project cost estimates (labor and materials). 16) Provide regular progress updates during bi-weekly management meetings with the City to present current status and address any issues with meeting notes. Task 3: Task Costs and Timelines Design/Engineering Service (Total): $TBD wl contingency Design/Engineering Contingency: 10% ($TBD) Timeline: Ongoing Buried New Construction Design: $1.25 foot est. xx : $ Buried New Construction As-Builts: $0.15 foot est. xx : $ Existing Duct Design: $0.65 foot est. xx : $ Existing Duct As-Builts: $0.15 foot est. xx : $ Expenses: No Expenses per Contract Task 4: Construction Management A Construction Manager resource(s) acting as a city liaison for the Outside Plant Team (OSP Team) that will manage the overall construction of the cities fiber optic network deployment and provide applicable oversight. Magellan will ensure overall compliance to project schedule, specifications, adhering to public works and right of way restrictions, safety standards, coordination of construction activities, ensure applicable project documentation, perform spot inspections, and ensure quality assurance is in place for the duration of the contract between the city and Magellan advisors. In addition, Magellan will: a) Manage the overall Construction deployment of the Outside Plant (OSP) construction for schedule management and specification compliance and documentation. b) Act as the main point of contact for selected construction contractor, addressing field issues, coordinating daily activities, ensuring compliance with health and safety requirements and applicable permits. c) Coordination with the City as applicable on updates with project reporting, construction activities, material access and handling, production tracking, documentation control, administrative requirements. d) Responsible for production tracking, coordination with construction vendor, schedule commitments, troubleshooting, punch list items, final completion and turnover to operations. e) Ensure delivery and Review Close-out package i. QA/QC Photos ii. Fiber Trace/SORB (losses and events) iii. Redlines from construction drawings, and bore logs iv. Review as -builds v. Final inspections as applicable vi. Review fiber test results f) Review assumptions and requirements before construction starts g) Ensure production within budget and within schedule timelines. h) Run "onsite" quarterly, cross -functional meetings with the city, providing applicable construction updates, identifying any issues with applicable action items and driving to successful completion. i) Magellan would develop a framework, and processes which City inspectors can execute upon for OSP construction inspections. Costs and Timelines Construction Management $12,500 per month" Expenses: No Expenses per Contract Timeline: 12 Months beginning July 1, 2018 "Construction Management Services only billable during pre -construction, construction, and close-out time periods Total Cost Proposal The total cost to the City of Rancho Cucamonga is outlined below in the following table: Tasks Description Price Task 1 Owner's Rep $90,000 Task 2 Network Implementation, Project Management $108,000 Task 3 Network Design/Engineering/Permit, and As -Built (OPTIONAL) $TBD Task 4 Construction Management (OPTIONAL) $12,500/Month If additional services are required beyond the stated proposal, Magellan will bill on an hourly basis or provide an additional quote for additional services. Magellan will submit invoices to Rancho Cucamonga monthly for actual hours billed and actual expenses incurred on the project. Magellan will extend net 30 terms to Rancho Cucamonga. Signature & Acceptance Signature of this Proposal by Client warrants that all components of this Proposal are acceptable to Rancho Cucamonga and that the person(s) signing this Proposal has the right, power and authority to execute the Proposal. Magellan Advisors, LLC City of Rancho Cucamonga A Florida Limited Liability Company 99918 1h Street, Suite 3000 Denver, CO 80202 Print Name: Courtney S. Violette Print Name: Title: COO ature: Title: Signature: Date: April 27, 2018 Date: is : SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (non -design) Last Revised: 10/02/13 Vendor Initials Page 16 Page 281 PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (non -design) Last Revised: 10102113 Vendor Initials Page 17 Page 282 . Attachment A — Sample Waiver of Subrogation (Sample Only — Not all forms will look identical to this Sample) POLICY NUMBER. WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS LIABILITY POLICY ENDORSEMENT WC 00 03 13 (00)-02 WAIVER'OF OUR RIGHT TO RECOVER FROM OTHERS ENDORSEMENT We have the right to recover our payments from anyone liable for an injury covered by this policy. We will not enforce our right against the person or organization named In the Schedule. (This agreement applies only to the extent that you perform work under a written contract that requires you to obtain this agreement from us.) This agreement shall not operate directly or Indirectly to benefit any one not named in the Schedule. SCHEDULE DESIGNATED PERSON: The City of Rancho Cucamonga, its officers, officials, employees, designated volunteers and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City or officink. DESIGNATED ORGANIZATION: PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (non -design) Last Revised: 10/02/13 Vendor Initials Page 18 Page 283 POLICY NUMBER: Attachment B — Sample Additional Insured for On-going Projects COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CG 20 10 07 04 .. THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. •' • This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following: COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART SCHEDULE Name Of Additional Insured Person(s) Or Organ izations : Locations Of Covered Operations The City of Rancho Cucamonga, its officers, officials, employees, designated volunteers and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City or officials. Information required to complete this Schedule, if not shown above, will be shown in the Declarations. A. Section II — Who Is An Insured is amended to include as an additional insured the person(s) or organization(s) shown in the Schedule, but only with respect to liability for "bodily injury", "property damage" or "personal and advertising injury" caused, in whole or in part, by: 1. Your acts or omissions; or 2. The acts or omissions of those acting on your behalf; in the performance of your ongoing operations for the additional insured(s) at the location(s) desig- nated above. CG 20 10 07 04 B. With respect to the insurance afforded to these additional insureds, the following additional exclu- sions apply: This insurance does not apply to "bodily injury" or "property damage" occurring after: 1. All work, including materials, parts or equip- ment furnished in connection with such work, on the project (other than service, maintenance or repairs) to be performed by or on behalf of the additional insured(s) at the location of the covered operations has been completed; or 2. That portion of "your work" out of which the injury or damage arises has been put to its in- tended use by any person or organization other than another contractor or subcontractor en- gaged in performing operations for a principal as a part of the same project. Q ISO Properties, Inc., 2004 PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (non-desigt) Last Revised: 10/02/13 Page 1 of 1 ❑ Vendor Initials Page 19 Page 284 DATE: August 15, 2018 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Natalie Avila, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO ACCEPT AS COMPLETE, FILE THE NOTICE OF COMPLETION, AND AUTHORIZE RELEASE OF RETENTION AND BONDS FOR THE CITYWIDE LED SAFETY LIGHT RENOVATION PROJECT. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council: 1. Accept the Installation of Citywide LED Safety Light Renovation Project (Project), Contract No. 17- 243, as complete; 2. Approve the final contract amount of $460,541; 3. Authorize the release of the Faithful Performance Bond 35 days after recordation of Notice of Completion and accept a Maintenance Guarantee Bond; 4. Authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $473,937, six months after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received; 5. Authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and release of the project retention , 35 days after recordation of Notice of Completion; and 6. Authorize the City Engineer to approve the release of the Maintenance Guarantee Bond one year following the filing of the Notice of Completion if the improvements remain free from defects in material and workmanship. BACKGROUND: This project included the removal of existing high pressure sodium traffic safety lighting and replacement with light emitting diode (LED) fixtures at all signalized locations Citywide. An energy efficiency rebate application for the replacement was be prepared and submitted to Southern California Edison. The program is part of a statewide effort to conserve energy which ended in December 2017. Bids were received and opened on August 8, 2017 and the subject Project was awarded on September 6, 2017. Pertinent information about the project is as follows: Budgeted Amount: $475,220 Contract Award Date: September 6, 2017 Contractor: Sierra Pacific Electrical Contracting Construction Bid Amount: $473,937 Contract Change Order Net: ($13,396) Final Contract Amount: $460,541 Page 285 ANALYSIS: The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The net decrease in the total cost of the project is a result of three (3) Contract Change Orders, including the balancing statement. Staff has reviewed the following change orders for completeness and accuracy as to the materials, equipment and labor included and are summarized as follows: • Change Order No. 01: Time and materials for additional work to install safety light by relocating existing communications equipment located on luminarie arm in order to accomplish the installment of the new safety lights at a few locations. This change order also included work to furnish and install four (4) safety light shields on two (2) luminaries at Church Street & Center Street to eliminate back lighting into the residential homes. The change in contract cost due to this change order is an increase of $1,283. • Change Order No. 02: Restocking fees for Ripley LifeLong2 Photocells that were unable to be installed in the field. The change in contract cost due to this change order is an increase of $1,368. • Change Order No. 03: This is the balancing statement for the project. The notable significant decrease in the quantities were due to the photoelectric cells being eliminated from the project. The change in contract cost due to this change order is a decrease of ($16,047.40). At the end of the one-year maintenance period, if the improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship, the City Clerk is authorized to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond upon approval by the City Engineer. FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funds have been included in the Fiscal Year 2017/18 Capital Budget for this project from the Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (SLD1) Fund (Fund 151) funded by the inter -fund loan from Capital Reserve Fund (Fund 025) in Account No. 1151303-5650/1974151-0. Further, the City has received a rebate from SCE in the amount of $75,694 and another $8,756 from a partnership incentive program for the installation of the LED fixtures. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This item addresses the City Council Goal of enhancing premier community status by engaging an opportunity to improve and promote energy efficiency not only within our jurisdiction but on a regional community basis. Page 286 DATE: August 15, 2018 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Romeo M. David, Associate Engineer Natalie Avila, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF A PURCHASE ORDER TO SIEMENS INDUSTRY, INC. FOR AN EMERGENCY REPLACEMENT OF THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONTROLLER CABINET AT HAVEN AVENUE AND CHURCH STREET. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council: 1. Authorize a Purchase Order in the amount of $56,591 to Siemens Industry, Inc. for the Emergency Replacement of the Traffic Signal at Haven Avenue and Church Street; and 2. Authorize an expenditure in the amount of $88,620 from the Vehicle and Equipment Replacement Fund (Fund 712) balance for emergency response costs. BACKGROUND: During construction operations for the Fiscal Year 2017/18 ADA Access Ramp Improvement Project at Haven Avenue and Church Street, the City's existing traffic signal equipment was damaged . On June 26, 2018, Vido Samarzich, Inc., the project's Contractor, began the demolition of the existing curb ramp on the southeast corner when crews were observed to have damaged the conduit directly under one of the traffic signal poles. Wires that were directly connected back to the traffic signal controller cabinet were compromised which caused the signal to fail into flashing red mode. The contractor was not able to provide a response team in a timely manner so the City's traffic maintenance contractor, Siemens Industry, Inc., was dispatched for emergency response. As notifications were being made to respond to the incident a fire erupted within the interior of the cabinet causing all equipment to be destroyed including the enclosure. City's traffic maintenance staff directed inspection staff to safely power off the electrical service and contact the Fire Department. Emergency responders promptly extinguished the fire preventing any further damage in the vicinity. Engineering and Traffic Maintenance have teamed to resolve the extensive damage to the City's assets. All equipment including new video detection cables that were just recently installed as part of separate capital improvement project have been replaced. All temporary repairs were completed by the Siemens emergency response team within about 15 hours and the signal was restored to operation by the following morning. ANALYSIS: While temporary repairs have been performed to make the traffic signal operational, final repairs will Page 287 require the full replacement of the traffic signal controller cabinet. In the meantime, the City is renting a temporary controller cabinet. Staff is requesting an emergency purchase of this traffic signal equipment to reduce the costs of rental fees and restore the intersection to its prior condition as soon as possible. The purchased equipment would be furnished and installed by the City's traffic maintenance contractor, Siemens Industry, Inc. Environmental: Staff has determined that the project is Categorically Excluded per the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Article 19 Categorical Exemptions. In Accordance with Section 15301 "Existing Facilities" subsection (c), Class 1 projects consist of minor alteration of existing public facilities, therefore, the scope of work is considered categorically exempt from CEQA. FISCAL IMPACT: Anticipated emergency response and replacement costs are estimated to be as follows: Purchase Order for Equipment (Siemens) $56,591 Emergency Response Invoice (Siemens) $32,028 Estimated Costs $88,619 An emergency expenditure of this magnitude was not anticipated in the Fiscal Year 2018/19 Budget and therefore authorization of expenditures in the amount of $88,620 is required along with an appropriation in the same amount from the Vehicle and Equipment Replacement Fund (Fund 712) fund balance as shown below. Staff anticipates filing a claim with the Contractor for the damages and will reimburse the fund balance with any recovered funds. Account No. Funding Source Description Amount 1712001-5603 Vehicle and Equipment Replacement (712) Capital Outlay Equipment $88,620 COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This item addresses the Council's goal of providing for Public Safety by ensuring that traffic control devices are operating in a safe and reliable manner. Page 288 DATE: August 15, 2018 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Brian Sandona, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF THE FINAL MAP OF TRACT NO. 20080, AN IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.'S 1 AND 2 RELATED TO SAID TRACT, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF VICTORIA STREET AND HERMOSA AVENUE, SUBMITTED BYHERMOSA, LLC,ALIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve the Final Map of Tract No. 20080, accepting the subject agreement and security, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2, and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause said map to record. BACKGROUND: On November 8, 2017, the Planning Commission approved Tentative Tract No. 20080 for the division of 5.43 acres into 20 lots in conjunction with a proposed residential development consisting of 20 residences (19 new and 1 existing) single family parcels located on the north side of Victoria Street and west of Hermosa Avenue. Tentative Tract No. 20080 was approved subject to a condition that certain public improvements be constructed including street, landscape, and streetlighting improvements. The Developer, Hermosa, LLC, a Limited Liability Company, has submitted an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond $178,200 Labor and Materials Bond $178,200 Monumentation (Cash Deposit) $3,850 Page 289 ANALYSIS: Approval by the council would approve the Final Map of Tract No. 20080, approve the improvement agreement, accept the security for the construction of certain public improvements, and order the annexation into Landscape Maintenance District 1 and Street Lighting Districts 1 and 2. The Final Map has been reviewed and found to be in substantial conformance with the approved Tentative Map. Further, the improvement agreement and security have been found to be sufficient to ensure the construction of the required public improvements. FISCAL IMPACT: This item would annex the subject property into Lighting Districts SLD 1 and SLD 2 providing districts: LMD No. 1 $1,844.20 SLD No. 1 $355.40 SLD No. 2 $799.40 Landscape Maintenance District LMD 1 and Street additional revenue in the following amounts to these Further this development will install 13 street trees and 10 street lights that will be maintained by the districts. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Enhancing Premier Community Status through the construction of high quality public improvements associated with the development of Tract No. 20080. ATTACHMENTS: Description Attachment 1 - Vicinity Map Attachment 2 - LMD 1 Attachment 3- S L D 1 Attachment 4- S L D 2 Page 290 Hkghland Aye Irdden Oaks ire -et Center JAEL qYe i Burrito St S U BTT20080 Vicinity Map NOT TO SCALE Sunridge Pines Apartmem dames rt 0 ra ro Mlgriantl�e St n S. 1-br. . ... x Shlnon Dr E U Heather St m grnp Aye _v 13 ENICAa 1-0111MQ rrs Deer Canyon 5ehoc M;gnpne#te SI re Hermas-� Park x o = Project Site co m � Vrrroria SI m Golden Yarrow Ln Monte VISID St M0111e Vr5[a Si 1Dsa _T - m Ir O Q ry La tirtn� gt Lb Vine St D - - - ---- -------------- ATTACHMENT 1 Page 291 RESOLUTION NO. 18 -XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (GENERAL CITY) FOR PROJECT CASE NO. SUBTT20080 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the "Act", said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (General City) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the Act authorize the annexation of additional territory to the District; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation of resolutions, and assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the Act related to the annexation of territory to the District, Article XIII D of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIII D") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the District on the territory proposed to be annexed to such District; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the District in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act to the annexation of the Territory to the District and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the District; and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act and/or Article XIII D applicable to the authorization to levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization to levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and Resolution No. 18 -XXX — Page 1 of 5 ATTACHMENT 2 Page 292 WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly agreed for themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns that: (1) The proportionate special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the District Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance and operation expenses of the Improvements; (2) The proposed annual assessment does not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit from the Improvements conferred on each parcel in the Territory. (3) Only the special benefits derived or to be derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements have been included in the proposed annual assessment. WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the District and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. C. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation the Territory to the District, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the District, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 15 day of August 2018. Resolution No. 18 -XXX — Page 2 of 5 Page 293 Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property to be Annexed SUBTT20080 The Owner of the Property is: HERMOSA, LLC, A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY The legal description of the Property is: A portion of lot 2, block 4, of Cucamonga Homestead Association, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as per map recorded in Book 6, Page 46 of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, State of California Assessor's Parcels Numbers of the Property: Resolution No. 18 -XXX — Page 3 of 5 Page 294 1076-081-01 Exhibit B Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2017/2018 Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (General City): Landscape Maintenance District No. 1(General City) (the "Maintenance District") represents various landscaped areas, parks and community trails located at various sites throughout the City. These sites consist of several non-contiguous areas throughout the City. As such, the parcels within this District do not represent a distinct district area as do the other LMD's within the City. Typically, new parcels within this District have been annexed upon development. The various sites maintained by the District consist of parkways, median islands, paseos, street trees, entry monuments, community trails and parks. The parks consist of Bear Gulch Park, East and West Beryl Park, Old Town Park, Church Street Park, Golden Oaks Park, Heritage Community Park, Hermosa Park, Red Hill Community Park, Lions Park, Napa Park, Don Tiburcio Tapia Park and the Rancho Cucamonga Adult Sports Complex). Proposed Additions to the Improvements for Project SUBTT20080: 13 Street Trees Resolution No. 18 -XXX — Page 4 of 5 Page 295 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2017/2018 Landscape Maintenance District No.1 (General City): The rate per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) is $92.21 for the fiscal year 2017/18. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (General City) for SUBTT20080: Land Use Basis EBU* Factor Rate per EBU* Single Family Residential Parcel 1.00 $92.21 Multi -Family Residential Unit 0.50 92.21 Non -Residential Acre 2.00 92.21 The proposed annual assessment for the property described in Exhibit A is as follows: 20 Parcels x 1 EBU Factor x $92.21 Rate per EBU = $1,844.20 Annual Assessment Resolution No. 18 -XXX — Page 5 of 5 Page 296 RESOLUTION NO. 18 -XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS) FOR SUBTT20080 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the "Act", said special maintenance district known and designated as Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the Act authorize the annexation of additional territory to the District; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation of resolutions, and assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the Act related to the annexation of territory to the District, Article XIII D of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIII D") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the District on the territory proposed to be annexed to such District; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the District in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act to the annexation of the Territory to the District and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the District; and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act and/or Article XIII D applicable to the authorization to levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization to levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and Resolution No. 18 -XXX — Page 1 of 5 ATTACHMENT 3 Page 297 WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly agreed for themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns that: (1) The proportionate special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the District Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance and operation expenses of the Improvements; (2) The proposed annual assessment does not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit from the Improvements conferred on each parcel in the Territory. (3) Only the special benefits derived or to be derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements have been included in the proposed annual assessment. WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the District and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. C. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation the Territory to the District, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the District, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 15 day of August 2018. Resolution No. 18 -XXX — Page 2 of 5 Page 298 Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property SUBTT20080 The Owner of the Property is: HERMOSA, LLC, A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY The legal description of the Property is: A portion of lot 2, block 4, of Cucamonga Homestead Association, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as per map recorded in Book 6, Page 46 of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, State of California Assessor's Parcels Numbers of the Property: 1076-081-01 Resolution No. 18 -XXX — Page 3 of 5 Page 299 Exhibit B Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2017/2018 Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets): Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets) (the "Maintenance District") is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. These sites consist of several non-contiguous areas throughout the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City. Proposed Additions to the Improvements for Project SUBTT20080: 0 Street Lights Resolution No. 18 -XXX — Page 4 of 5 Page 300 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2017/2018 Street Light Maintenance District No.1 (Arterial Streets): The rate per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2017/18. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No.1 (Arterial Streets) for SUBTT20080: Land Use Basis EBU Factor* Rate per EBU* Single Family Residential Parcel 1.00 $17.77 Multi -Family Residential Parcel 1.00 17.77 Non -Residential Acre 2.00 17.77 The proposed annual assessment for the property described in Exhibit A is as follows: 20 Parcels x 1 EBU Factor x $17.77 Rate per EBU = $355.40 Annual Assessment Resolution No. 18 -XXX — Page 5 of 5 Page 301 RESOLUTION NO. 18 -XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 (LOCAL STREETS) FOR SUBTT20080 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the "Act", said special maintenance district known and designated as Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (Local Streets) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the Act authorize the annexation of additional territory to the District; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation of resolutions, and assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the Act related to the annexation of territory to the District, Article XIII D of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIII D") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the District on the territory proposed to be annexed to such District; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the District in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act to the annexation of the Territory to the District and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the District; and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act and/or Article XIII D applicable to the authorization to levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization to levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and Resolution No. 18 -XXX — Page 1 of 5 ATTACHMENT 4 Page 302 WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly agreed for themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns that: (1) The proportionate special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the District Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance and operation expenses of the Improvements; (2) The proposed annual assessment does not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit from the Improvements conferred on each parcel in the Territory. (3) Only the special benefits derived or to be derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements have been included in the proposed annual assessment. WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the District and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. C. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation the Territory to the District, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the District, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 15 day of August 2018. Resolution No. 18 -XXX — Page 2 of 5 Page 303 Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property SUBTT20080 The Owner of the Property is: HERMOSA, LLC, A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY The legal description of the Property is: A portion of lot 2, block 4, of Cucamonga Homestead Association, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as per map recorded in Book 6, Page 46 of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, State of California Assessor's Parcels Numbers of the Property: 1076-081-01 Resolution No. 18 -XXX — Page 3 of 5 Page 304 Exhibit B Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2017/2018 Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (Local Streets): Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (Local Streets) (the "Maintenance District") is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local streets throughout the City but excluding those areas already in another local maintenance district. Generally, this area encompasses the residential area of the City west of Haven Avenue. The sites maintained by the District consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets generally west of Haven Avenue. Proposed Additions to the Improvements for Project SUBTT20080: 10 LED Street Lights Resolution No. 18 -XXX — Page 4 of 5 Page 305 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2017/2018 Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (Local Streets): The rate per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) is $39.97 for the fiscal year 2017/18. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (Local Streets) for SUBTT20080: Land Use Basis EBU Factor* Rate per EBU* Single Family Residential Parcel 1.00 $39.97 Multi -Family Residential Unit 1.00 39.97 Non -Residential Acre 2.00 39.97 The proposed annual assessment for the property described in Exhibit A is as follows: 20 Parcels x 1 EBU Factor x $39.97 Rate per EBU = $799.40 Annual Assessment Resolution No. 18 -XXX — Page 5 of 5 Page 306 DATE: TO: FROM: INITIATED BY: SUBJECT: August 15, 2018 Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Brian Sandona, Associate Engineer CONSIDERATION OF A SMALL CELL LICENSE AGREEMENT WITH NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY (AT&T) FOR THE PLACEMENT OF SMALL CELL INFRASTRUCTURE ON CITY -OWNED POLES. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council approve the Small Cell License Agreement between New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company (AT&T) and the City of Rancho Cucamonga and authorize the Mayor to sign the agreement. BACKGROUND: Small cell technology is used by wireless providers to better serve their customers by filling small gaps in their cellular coverage or to provide additional capacity in an existing area covered by their service. ANALYSIS: AT&T desires to enter into a license agreement with the City to allow for placement of their small cell equipment within the City right-of-way on City owned poles. Under this agreement, AT&T would attach their equipment to existing City -owned street lights, or replace existing street light poles with new street light poles designed to support their equipment. The agreement defines the ownership, maintenance, cost, and value of all future installations. Further, the installation of wireless communications facilities is governed by Ordinance No. 929 adopted by the City Council on May 16, 2018. FISCAL IMPACT: The City will be compensated per section 5.1 of the license agreement on file with the City Clerk's office and summarized below: Seven Hundred Dollars ($700) per Pole for any combination of Remote Radios and cantenna/antenna units not to exceed four (4) total. During the terms of the agreements, the License Fee shall be increased by one and a half percent (1.5%) over the License Fee paid for the immediately preceding year. Page 307 COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Enhancing Premier Community Status through a license agreement which will provide enhanced services to the community. Page 308 DATE: August 15, 2018 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Brian Sandona, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF AN IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.'S 1 AND 6 RELATED TO CASE NO. DRC2016-00670, LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF 4TH STREET AND UTICA AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY FOURTH & UTICA L.P. C/O IDS REAL ESTATE. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council approve the subject agreement and security, order the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 related to Case No. DRC2016-00670, and authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND: On November 8, 2017, the Planning Commission approved Case No. DRC2016-00670 for construction of a 232,358 square foot warehouse logistics and office building on a vacant site of 11.84 acres located at the northeast corner of 4th Street and Utica Avenue. DRC2016-00670 was approved subject to a condition that certain public improvements, including street and sidewalk improvements, be constructed. The Developer, Fourth and Utica L.P. c/o IDS Real Estate, has submitted an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond $70,200 Labor and Materials Bond $70,200 ANALYSIS: The improvement agreement and securities have been found to be sufficient to ensure construction of the required public improvements. Page 309 FISCAL IMPACT: This item would annex the subject property into Landscape Maintenance District LMD 3B and Street Lighting Districts SLD 1 and SLD 6 providing additional revenue in the following amounts to these districts: LMD No. 3B $3,330.43 SLD No. 1 $419.37 SLD No. 6 $606.52 Further, this development will install 14 street trees and 0 street lights that will be maintained by the districts. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Enhancing Premier Community Status through the construction of high quality public improvements associated with the development of this project. ATTACHMENTS: Description Attachment 1 - Vicinity Map Attachment 2 - Resolution LMD 3B Attachment 3 -Resolution SLD 1 Attachment 4 - Resolution SLD 6 Page 310 D RC2016-00670 Vicinity Map NOT TO SCALE _ Coca -Coif Battling ARCO � n 6#h st 4lnlvemal Technical Instltule Trademark St WaBa G[lil Erlt&prise :l Q -Ra roc he camonga Fourth St :1L3b Apart merits Tr ad --"'-a 6th St _C u D K r# REHP 6th _c Project Site ro fG { fD Fourth St Fourth SM z � T Vintage Apartments 9 Camden LandMark — > Apartments fi scours Isl Concours St Z z rp rb ro n Lot F 0- Citizens Businc °�, Bank Arc 0 N ATTACHMENT 1 Page 311 RESOLUTION NO. 18 -XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B (COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL MAINTENANCE DISTRICT) FOR DRC2016-00670 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the "Act", said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B (Commercial Industrial Maintenance District) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the Act authorize the annexation of additional territory to the District; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation of resolutions, and assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the Act related to the annexation of territory to the District, Article XIII D of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIII D") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the District on the territory proposed to be annexed to such District; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the District in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act to the annexation of the Territory to the District and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the District; and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act and/or Article XIII D applicable to the authorization to levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization to levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and Resolution No. 18 -XXX — Page 1 of 5 ATTACHMENT 2 Page 312 WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly agreed for themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns that: (1) The proportionate special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the District Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance and operation expenses of the Improvements; (2) The proposed annual assessment does not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit from the Improvements conferred on each parcel in the Territory. (3) Only the special benefits derived or to be derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements have been included in the proposed annual assessment. WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the District and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation the Territory to the District, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the District, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 15 day of August 2018. Resolution No. 18 -XXX — Page 2 of 5 Page 313 Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property DRC2016-00670 The Owner of the Property is: Fourth & Utica L.P. c/o IDS Real Estate The legal description of the Property is: PARCELS 6 AND 7 OF PARCEL MAP 17318 IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AS PER MAP BOOK 214 PAGES 83 AND 84 IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY TOGETHER WITH PARCELS B, C, AND D AS DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE NO. 701 FOR LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT, RECORDED NOVEMBER 26, 2014 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2014-0456671 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING ATA POINT BEING THE MOST NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF PARCEL A AS SHOWN IN SAID LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT; THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL S00 DEG 00'36"W, A DISTANCE OF 746.13 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID LINE N89 DEG 54'27"E, A DISTANCE OF 53.37 FEET; THENCE S00 DEG 05'33"E, A DISTANCE OF 123.99 FEET TO THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF FOURTH STREET; THENCE ALONG SAID LINE S73 DEG 35'29"W, A DISTANCE OF 20.18 FEET; THENCE N89 DEG 21'54"W, A DISTANCE OF 234.32 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON -TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 339.00 FEET, TO WHICH BEGINNING OF CURVE A RADIAL BEARS SO4 DEG 26'57"W; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 07 DEG 37'41", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 45.13 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 339.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID REVERSE CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 07 DEG 37'41", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 45.13 FEET; THENCE N89 DEG 21'54'W, A DISTANCE OF 96.02 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON -TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 96.57 FEET, TO WHICH BEGINNING OF CURVE A RADIAL BEARS N09 DEG 53'39"E; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 18 DEG 31'05', AN ARC DISTANCE OF 31.21 FEET; THENCE N89 DEG 21'54"W, A DISTANCE OF 150,00 FEET; THENCE N52 DEG 17'26"W, A DISTANCE OF 21.98 FEET TO THE EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF UTICA AVENUE; THENCE ALONG SAID LINE N00 DEG 05'57"W, A DISTANCE OF 851.11 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL B; THENCE ALONG SAID LINE S89 DEG 21'54"E, A DISTANCE OF 585.67 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING Assessor's Parcels Numbers of the Property: 210-082-94 Resolution No. 18 -XXX — Page 3 of 5 Page 314 Exhibit B Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2017/2018 Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B (Commercial Industrial Maintenance District): Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B (Commercial Industrial Maintenance District) (the "Maintenance District") represents landscape sites throughout the Commercial/Industrial Maintenance District. The various landscape sites that are maintained by this district consist of median islands, parkways, street trees and entry monuments. Proposed Additions to the Improvements for Project DRC2016-00670: 14 Street Trees Resolution No. 18 -XXX — Page 4 of 5 Page 315 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2017/2018 Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B (Commercial Industrial Maintenance District): The rate per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) is $282.24 for the fiscal year 2017/18. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B (Commercial Industrial Maintenance District) for DRC2016-00670: Land Use Basis EBU Factor* Rate per EBU* Non -Residential Acre 1.00 $282.24 The proposed annual assessment for the property described in Exhibit A is as follows: 11.8 Acres x 1.0 EBU Factor x $282.24 Rate per EBU = $3330.43 Annual Assessment Resolution No. 18 -XXX — Page 5 of 5 Page 316 RESOLUTION NO. 18 -XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS) FOR DRC2016-00670 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the "Act", said special maintenance district known and designated as Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the Act authorize the annexation of additional territory to the District; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation of resolutions, and assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the Act related to the annexation of territory to the District, Article XIII D of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIII D") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the District on the territory proposed to be annexed to such District; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the District in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act to the annexation of the Territory to the District and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the District; and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act and/or Article XIII D applicable to the authorization to levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization to levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and Resolution No. 18 -XXX — Page 1 of 5 ATTACHMENT 3 Page 317 WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly agreed for themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns that: (1) The proportionate special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the District Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance and operation expenses of the Improvements; (2) The proposed annual assessment does not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit from the Improvements conferred on each parcel in the Territory. (3) Only the special benefits derived or to be derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements have been included in the proposed annual assessment. WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the District and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. C. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation the Territory to the District, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the District, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 15 day of August 2018. Resolution No. 18 -XXX — Page 2 of 5 Page 318 Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property DRC2016-00670 The Owner of the Property is: Fourth & Utica L.P. c/o IDS Real Estate The legal description of the Property is: PARCELS 6 AND 7 OF PARCEL MAP 17318 IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AS PER MAP BOOK 214 PAGES 83 AND 84 IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY TOGETHER WITH PARCELS B, C, AND D AS DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE NO. 701 FOR LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT, RECORDED NOVEMBER 26, 2014 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2014-0456671 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING ATA POINT BEING THE MOST NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF PARCEL A AS SHOWN IN SAID LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT; THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL S00 DEG 00'36"W, A DISTANCE OF 746.13 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID LINE N89 DEG 54'27"E, A DISTANCE OF 53.37 FEET; THENCE S00 DEG 05'33"E, A DISTANCE OF 123.99 FEET TO THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF FOURTH STREET; THENCE ALONG SAID LINE S73 DEG 35'29"W, A DISTANCE OF 20.18 FEET; THENCE N89 DEG 21'54"W, A DISTANCE OF 234.32 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON -TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 339.00 FEET, TO WHICH BEGINNING OF CURVE A RADIAL BEARS SO4 DEG 26'57"W; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 07 DEG 37'41", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 45.13 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 339.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID REVERSE CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 07 DEG 37'41", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 45.13 FEET; THENCE N89 DEG 21'54'W, A DISTANCE OF 96.02 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON -TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 96.57 FEET, TO WHICH BEGINNING OF CURVE A RADIAL BEARS N09 DEG 53'39"E; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 18 DEG 31'05', AN ARC DISTANCE OF 31.21 FEET; THENCE N89 DEG 21'54"W, A DISTANCE OF 150,00 FEET; THENCE N52 DEG 17'26"W, A DISTANCE OF 21.98 FEET TO THE EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF UTICA AVENUE; THENCE ALONG SAID LINE N00 DEG 05'57"W, A DISTANCE OF 851.11 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL B; THENCE ALONG SAID LINE S89 DEG 21'54"E, A DISTANCE OF 585.67 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING Assessor's Parcels Numbers of the Property: 210-082-94 Resolution No. 18 -XXX — Page 3 of 5 Page 319 Exhibit B Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2017/2018 Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets): Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets) (the "Maintenance District") is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. These sites consist of several non-contiguous areas throughout the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City. Proposed Additions to the Improvements for Project DRC2016-00670: 0 Street Lights Resolution No. 18 -XXX — Page 4 of 5 Page 320 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2017/2018 Street Light Maintenance District No.1 (Arterial Streets): The rate per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2017/18. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No.1 (Arterial Streets) for DRC2016-00670: Land Use Basis EBU Factor* Rate per EBU* Single Family Residential Parcel 1.00 $17.77 Multi -Family Residential Parcel 1.00 17.77 Non -Residential Acre 2.00 17.77 The proposed annual assessment for the property described in Exhibit A is as follows: 11.8 Acres x 2.0 EBU Factor x $17.77 Rate per EBU = $419.37 Annual Assessment Resolution No. 18 -XXX — Page 5 of 5 Page 321 RESOLUTION NO. 18 -XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL) FOR DRC2016-00670 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the "Act", said special maintenance district known and designated as Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial/Industrial)(the "District"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the Act authorize the annexation of additional territory to the District; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation of resolutions, and assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the Act related to the annexation of territory to the District, Article XIII D of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIII D") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the District on the territory proposed to be annexed to such District; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the District in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act to the annexation of the Territory to the District and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the District; and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act and/or Article XIII D applicable to the authorization to levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization to levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and Resolution No. 18 -XXX — Page 1 of 5 ATTACHMENT 4 Page 322 WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly agreed for themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns that: (1) The proportionate special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the District Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance and operation expenses of the Improvements; (2) The proposed annual assessment does not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit from the Improvements conferred on each parcel in the Territory. (3) Only the special benefits derived or to be derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements have been included in the proposed annual assessment. WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the District and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation the Territory to the District, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the District, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 15 day of August 2018. Resolution No. 18 -XXX — Page 2 of 5 Page 323 Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property DRC2016-00670 The Owner of the Property is: Fourth & Utica L.P. c/o IDS Real Estate The legal description of the Property is: PARCELS 6 AND 7 OF PARCEL MAP 17318 IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AS PER MAP BOOK 214 PAGES 83 AND 84 IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY TOGETHER WITH PARCELS B, C, AND D AS DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE NO. 701 FOR LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT, RECORDED NOVEMBER 26, 2014 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2014-0456671 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING ATA POINT BEING THE MOST NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF PARCEL A AS SHOWN IN SAID LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT; THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL S00 DEG 00'36"W, A DISTANCE OF 746.13 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID LINE N89 DEG 54'27"E, A DISTANCE OF 53.37 FEET; THENCE S00 DEG 05'33"E, A DISTANCE OF 123.99 FEET TO THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF FOURTH STREET; THENCE ALONG SAID LINE S73 DEG 35'29"W, A DISTANCE OF 20.18 FEET; THENCE N89 DEG 21'54"W, A DISTANCE OF 234.32 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON -TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 339.00 FEET, TO WHICH BEGINNING OF CURVE A RADIAL BEARS SO4 DEG 26'57"W; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 07 DEG 37'41", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 45.13 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 339.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID REVERSE CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 07 DEG 37'41", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 45.13 FEET; THENCE N89 DEG 21'54'W, A DISTANCE OF 96.02 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON -TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 96.57 FEET, TO WHICH BEGINNING OF CURVE A RADIAL BEARS N09 DEG 53'39"E; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 18 DEG 31'05', AN ARC DISTANCE OF 31.21 FEET; THENCE N89 DEG 21'54"W, A DISTANCE OF 150,00 FEET; THENCE N52 DEG 17'26"W, A DISTANCE OF 21.98 FEET TO THE EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF UTICA AVENUE; THENCE ALONG SAID LINE N00 DEG 05'57"W, A DISTANCE OF 851.11 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL B; THENCE ALONG SAID LINE S89 DEG 21'54"E, A DISTANCE OF 585.67 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING Assessor's Parcels Numbers of the Property: 210-082-94 Resolution No. 18 -XXX — Page 3 of 5 Page 324 Exhibit B Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2017/2018 Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial/Industrial): Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (the "Maintenance District") is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on commercial and industrial streets throughout the City but excluding those areas already in a local maintenance district. Generally, this area encompasses the industrial area of the City south of Foothill Boulevard The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on industrial or commercial streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on industrial or commercial streets generally south of Foothill Boulevard. Proposed Additions to the Improvements for Project DRC2016-00670: 0 Street Lights Resolution No. 18 -XXX — Page 4 of 5 Page 325 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2017/2018 Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial/Industrial): The rate per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) is $51.40 for the fiscal year 2017/18. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial/Industrial) for DRC2016-00670: Land Use Basis EBU Rate per Factor* EBU* Commercial/ Industrial Acre 1.00 $51.40 The proposed annual assessment for the property described in Exhibit A is as follows: 11.8 Acres x 1.0 EBU Factor x $51.40 Rate per EBU = $ 606.52 Annual Assessment Resolution No. 18 -XXX — Page 5 of 5 Page 326 DATE: August 15, 2018 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Brian Sandona, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF AN IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3A AND STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.'S 1 AND 6 RELATED TO CASE NO. DRC2016-00294 LOCATED AT 9455 HYSSOP DRIVE, SUBMITTED BY CHASE PARTNERS, LTD. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council approve the subject agreement and order the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 related to Case No. DRC2016-00670, and authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND: On March 22, 2017, the Planning Commission approved Case No. DRC2016-00294 for construction of a 42,875 square foot warehouse logistics and office building on a vacant site of 1.9 acres located at 9455 Hyssop Drive. DRC2016-00294 was approved subject to a condition that certain public improvements including street and landscaping improvements be constructed. The Developer, Chase Partners, LTD, has submitted an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Cash Deposit $3,300 Labor and Materials Cash Deposit $3,300 ANALYSIS: The improvement agreement and securities have been found to be sufficient to ensure construction of the required public improvements. Page 327 FISCAL IMPACT: This item would annex the subject property into Landscape Maintenance District LMD 3A and Street Lighting Districts SLD 1 and SLD 6 providing additional annual revenue in the following amounts to these districts: LMD No. 3A $413.74 SLD No. 1 $72.15 SLD No. 6 $104.34 Further this development will install 6 street trees and 1 street light that will be maintained by the districts. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Enhancing Premier Community Status through the construction of high quality public improvements associated with the development of this project. ATTACHMENTS: Description Attachment 1 - Vicinity Map Attachment 2 - Resolution LMD 3A Attachment 3 -Resolution SLD 1 Attachment 4- S L D 6 Page 328 D RC2016-00294 Vicinity Map NOT TO SCALE C C7 4 < 5th 5t oth 57 rb 1 0 Monorice Nivnghim America, Inc 9 s �' Grainger ,B Industrial Supply T 1 CS ' Turners Outdaarsman Discount Dance Supply San Marmn St r Pi3rk Lir s m n 1 as 7 S 4 N N� u a L" P, Project Site n Costca Wholesale .7 F 4 s Bank of America Financial Center G Ards Ontario Palace n. .22 IMAX & RPX ATTACHMENT 1 Page 329 RESOLUTION NO. 18 -XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3A (HYSSOP MAINTENANCE DISTRICT) FOR DRC2016-00294 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the "Act", said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A (Hyssop Maintenance District) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the Act authorize the annexation of additional territory to the District; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation of resolutions, and assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the Act related to the annexation of territory to the District, Article XIII D of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIII D") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the District on the territory proposed to be annexed to such District; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the District in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act to the annexation of the Territory to the District and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the District; and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act and/or Article XIII D applicable to the authorization to levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization to levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and Resolution No. 18 -XXX — Page 1 of 5 ATTACHMENT 2 Page 330 WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly agreed for themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns that: (1) The proportionate special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the District Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance and operation expenses of the Improvements; (2) The proposed annual assessment does not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit from the Improvements conferred on each parcel in the Territory. (3) Only the special benefits derived or to be derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements have been included in the proposed annual assessment. WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the District and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation the Territory to the District, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the District, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 15 day of August 2018. Resolution No. 18 -XXX — Page 2 of 5 Page 331 Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property to be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: CHASE PARTNERS, LTD The legal description of the Property is: PARCEL MAP 7349 PARCEL 6 BOOK 83 PAGE 20 Assessor's Parcels Numbers of the Property: 0229-321-07-0000 Resolution No. 18 -XXX — Page 3 of 5 Page 332 Exhibit B Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2017/2018 Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A (Hyssop Maintenance District): Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A (Hyssop Maintenance District) (the "Maintenance District") represents a landscape parkway on Hyssop Drive south of Sixth Street. Proposed Additions to the Improvements for Project DRC2016-00294: 6 Street Trees Resolution No. 18 -XXX — Page 4 of 5 Page 333 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2017/2018 Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A (Hyssop Maintenance District): The rate per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) is $413.74 for the fiscal year 2017/18. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A (Hyssop Maintenance District) for DRC2016-00294: Land Use Basis EBU Rate per Factor* EBU* Non -Residential Parcel 1.00 $413.74 The proposed annual assessment for the property described in Exhibit A is as follows: 1 Parcels x 1 EBU Factor x $413.74 Rate per EBU = $413.74 Annual Assessment Resolution No. 18 -XXX — Page 5 of 5 Page 334 RESOLUTION NO. 18 -XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS) FOR DRC2016-00294 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the "Act", said special maintenance district known and designated as Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the Act authorize the annexation of additional territory to the District; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation of resolutions, and assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the Act related to the annexation of territory to the District, Article XIII D of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIII D") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the District on the territory proposed to be annexed to such District; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the District in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act to the annexation of the Territory to the District and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the District; and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act and/or Article XIII D applicable to the authorization to levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization to levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and Resolution No. 18 -XXX — Page 1 of 5 ATTACHMENT 3 Page 335 WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly agreed for themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns that: (1) The proportionate special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the District Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance and operation expenses of the Improvements; (2) The proposed annual assessment does not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit from the Improvements conferred on each parcel in the Territory. (3) Only the special benefits derived or to be derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements have been included in the proposed annual assessment. WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the District and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. C. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation the Territory to the District, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the District, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 15 day of August 2018. Resolution No. 18 -XXX — Page 2 of 5 Page 336 Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property to be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: CHASE PARTNERS, LTD The legal description of the Property is: PARCEL MAP 7349 PARCEL 6 BOOK 83 PAGE 20 Assessor's Parcels Numbers of the Property: 0229-321-07-0000 Resolution No. 18 -XXX — Page 3 of 5 Page 337 Exhibit B Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2017/2018 Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets): Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets) (the "Maintenance District") is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. These sites consist of several non-contiguous areas throughout the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City. Proposed Additions to the Improvements for Project DRC2016-00294: 0 street lights Resolution No. 18 -XXX — Page 4 of 5 Page 338 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2017/2018 Street Light Maintenance District No.1 (Arterial Streets): The rate per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2017/18. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No.1 (Arterial Streets) for DRC2016-00294: Land Use Basis EBU Factor* Rate per EBU* Single Family Residential Parcel 1.00 $17.77 Multi -Family Residential Parcel 1.00 17.77 Non -Residential Acre 2.00 17.77 The proposed annual assessment for the property described in Exhibit A is as follows: 2.03 Acres x 2.00 EBU Factor x $17.77 Rate per EBU = $72.15 Annual Assessment Resolution No. 18 -XXX — Page 5 of 5 Page 339 RESOLUTION NO.18-XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL) FOR DRC2016-00294 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the "Act", said special maintenance district known and designated as Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial/Industrial)(the "District"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the Act authorize the annexation of additional territory to the District; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation of resolutions, and assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the Act related to the annexation of territory to the District, Article XIII D of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIII D") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the District on the territory proposed to be annexed to such District; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the District in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act to the annexation of the Territory to the District and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the District; and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act and/or Article XIII D applicable to the authorization to levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization to levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and Resolution No. 18 -XXX — Page 1 of 5 ATTACHMENT 4 Page 340 WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly agreed for themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns that: (1) The proportionate special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the District Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance and operation expenses of the Improvements; (2) The proposed annual assessment does not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit from the Improvements conferred on each parcel in the Territory. (3) Only the special benefits derived or to be derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements have been included in the proposed annual assessment. WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the District and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation the Territory to the District, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the District, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 15 day of August 2018. Resolution No. 18 -XXX — Page 2 of 5 Page 341 Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property to be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: CHASE PARTNERS, LTD The legal description of the Property is: PARCEL MAP 7349 PARCEL 6 BOOK 83 PAGE 20 Assessor's Parcels Numbers of the Property: 0229-321-07-0000 Resolution No. 18 -XXX — Page 3 of 5 Page 342 Exhibit B Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2017/2018 Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial/Industrial): Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (the "Maintenance District") is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on commercial and industrial streets throughout the City but excluding those areas already in a local maintenance district. Generally, this area encompasses the industrial area of the City south of Foothill Boulevard The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on industrial or commercial streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on industrial or commercial streets generally south of Foothill Boulevard. Proposed Additions to the Improvements for Project DRC2016-00294: 1 LED street lights Resolution No. 18 -XXX — Page 4 of 5 Page 343 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2017/2018 Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial/Industrial): The rate per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) is $51.40 for the fiscal year 2017/18. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial/Industrial) for DRC2016-00294: Land Use Basis EBU Rate per Factor* EBU* Commercial/ Industrial Acre 1.00 $51.40 The proposed annual assessment for the property described in Exhibit A is as follows: 2.03 Acres x 1.00 EBU Factor x $51.40 Rate per EBU = $104.34 Annual Assessment Resolution No. 18 -XXX — Page 5 of 5 Page 344 DATE: August 15, 2018 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Linda A. Troyan, MMC, City Clerk Services Director SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF THE BIENNIAL REVIEW OF THE CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE FOR THE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Fire Board/City Council direct staff to proceed with the biennial review of its Conflict of Interest Code. BACKGROUND: The Political Reform Act requires every local government agency to review its Conflict of Interest Code biennially. A Conflict of Interest Code tells public officials, governmental employees, and consultants what financial interests they must disclose on their Statement of Economic Interests (Form 700). The City Council is the Code reviewing body for the Fire District. ANALYSIS: This biennial review ensures that the Code includes disclosure by those officials who make or participate in making governmental decisions. Amendments must be submitted to City Council for approval within 90 days of the biennial review. FISCAL IMPACT: Not applicable. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Not Applicable. Page 345 DATE: August 15, 2018 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager, Administrative Services INITIATED BY: Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director Robert Neiuber, Human Resources Director Lucy Alvarez -Nunez, Management Analyst I SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE AN ADJUSTMENT TO THE BUDGET ANALYST SALARY RANGE AND ADOPT A RESOLUTION UPDATING THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION SALARY SCHEDULE FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018/19, INCLUDING A SALARY ADJUSTMENT TO THE BUDGET ANALYST CLASSIFICATION. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga approve an adjustment to the Budget Analyst salary range and adopt a resolution updating the Rancho Cucamonga City Employees Association Salary Schedule for Fiscal Year 2018/19, including a salary adjustment to the Budget Analyst classification. BACKGROUND: The Budget Analyst is a critical position responsible for coordinating, preparing and maintaining the City's budget. This position is the only City position dedicated to the production and tracking of the City budget. Additional budget support is provided by a part-time Management Aide as well as 40% of the Principal Accountant's job duties. The Budget Analyst position will become vacant in October due to a retirement. The City will be conducting a recruitment to fill this critical position. The City also met with Rancho Cucamonga City Employees Association, RCCEA, and discussed this matter. In anticipation of the recruitment, the City conducted a recent compensation study that revealed that the Budget Analyst classification salary range is 11 % below market in comparison to comparable positions in our survey cities. In addition, the current Budget Analyst position has a comparable scope of responsibilities to the City's Management Analyst I I I classification. The City Council traditionally adopts salary resolutions for those classifications employed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. These resolutions are occasionally updated to reflect changes in salaries, additions and deletions of classification, changes in job titles and other terms of employment. All salaries, classifications, job titles and other terms of employment remain the same except for the adjustment of the Budget Analyst salary range. Page 346 ANALYSIS: To address future staffing needs and successfully conduct a recruitment for the upcoming Budget Analyst vacancy, staff is recommending that the City Council approve an increase to the Budget Analyst salary range of 8.5%. This increase would align the Budget Analyst salary range to the current Management Analyst I I I salary range. Staff believes that by adjusting the salary range of the existing Budget Analyst position, the City will be in a better position to recruit and attract well qualified applicants to the recruitment. FISCAL IMPACT: The adjustments to the salary range can be absorbed within the current Finance Department budget and will be reflected in any future budget documents. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: ENHANCING PREMIER COMMUNITY STATUS As the community matures, undertake programs and projects to enhance Rancho Cucamonga's position as the premier community in our region. ATTACHMENTS: Description Attachment 1 - Resolution No. 18 - Attachment 2 - RCCEA Salary Schedule Page 347 RESOLUTION NO. 18 -XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING UPDATED RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION SALARY SCHEDULE FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018-19, INCLUDING A SALARY ADJUSTMENT TO THE BUDGET ANALYST CLASSIFICATION WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has determined that it is necessary for the efficient operation and management of the City that policies be established prescribing salary ranges, benefits and holidays and other policies for employees of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has previously adopted salary resolutions establishing salary ranges, benefits and other terms of employment for employees of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga recognizes that it is necessary from time to time to amend the salary resolution to accommodate changes in position titles, classifications salary ranges, benefits and other terms of employment; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California to approve the attached updated salary schedule for the Rancho Cucamonga City Employees Association, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 15th day of August 2018. Page 1 of 1 ATTACHMENT 1 Page 348 Resolution No. 18 -XXX RCCEA COVERED EMPLOYEES IN THE MID MANAGER, SUPERVISORY/PROFESSIONAL AND GENERAL EMPLOYEES GROUPS ASSIGNMENTS OF CLASSIFICATIONS TO PAY RANGES Monthly Pay Ranges Effective August 15, 2018 Minimum Control Point Maximum Class Title Step Amount Step Amount Step Amount Account Clerk 4375 $2,908 4415 $3,550 4435 $3,922 Account Technician 4423 $3,694 4463 $4,509 4483 $4,983 Accountant# 3465 $4,555 3505 $5,560 3525 $6,143 Accounting Manager* 2525 $6,143 2565 $7,499 2585 $8,285 Accounts Payable Supervisor# 3470 $4,670 3510 $5,701 3530 $6,229 Administrative Assistant 4349 $2,554 4409 $3,445 4429 $3,807 Administrative Technician 4437 $3,962 4477 $4,836 4497 $5,343 Animal Care Attendant 4349 $2,554 4389 $3,118 4409 $3,445 Animal Care Supervisor# 3416 $3,567 3456 $4,355 3476 $4,811 Animal Caretaker 4378 $2,952 4418 $3,603 4438 $3,981 Animal Center Manager* 2506 $5,589 2546 $6,822 2566 $7,537 Animal Handler 4388 $3,102 4428 $3,787 4448 $4,185 Animal License Canvasser 4349 $2,554 4389 $3,118 4409 $3,445 Animal Services Dispatcher 4369 $2,822 4409 $3,445 4429 $3,807 Animal Services Officer 1 4421 $3,658 4461 $4,465 4481 $4,933 Animal Services Officer II 4441 $4,041 4481 $4,933 4501 $5,451 Assistant City Clerk # 3535 $6,458 3575 $7,883 3595 $8,710 Assistant City Engineer* 2590 $8,495 2630$10,370 2650 $11,459 Assistant Engineer# 3488 $5,108 3528 $6,236 3548 $6,890 Assistant Library Director* 2572 $7,765 2612 $9,480 2632 $10,474 Assistant Planner# 3468 $4,624 3508 $5,645 3528 $6,236 Assistant to the City Manager* 2548 $6,890 2588 $8,411 2608 $9,293 Associate Engineer# 3518 $5,933 3558 $7,242 3578 $8,002 Associate Planner# 3487 $5,083 3527 $6,206 3547 $6,856 Box Office Coordinator 4450 $4,227 4490 $53160 4510 $5,701 Budget Analyst# 3515 $5,845 3555 $73134 3575 $7,883 Building Inspection Supervisor#2 3504 $5,532 3544 $63754 3564 $7,462 Building Inspector 12 4444 $4,101 4484 $5,007 4504 $5,532 Building Inspector 112 4464 $4,532 4504 $53532 4524 $6,113 Building and Safety Manager* 2533 $6,394 2573 $7,804 2593 $8,623 Business License Clerk 4378 $2,952 4418 $33603 4438 $3,981 Business License Inspector 4418 $3,603 4458 $43398 4478 $4,860 Business License Program Coordinator# 3432 $3,864 3472 $43716 3492 $5,211 Rancho Cucamonga City Employee Association Attachment 2 August 15, 2018 Page 349 Resolution No. 18 -XXX RCCEA COVERED EMPLOYEES IN THE MID MANAGER, SUPERVISORY/PROFESSIONAL AND GENERAL EMPLOYEES GROUPS ASSIGNMENTS OF CLASSIFICATIONS TO PAY RANGES Monthly Pay Ranges Effective August 15, 2018 Minimum Control Point Maximum Business License Program Supervisor# 3442 $4,062 3482 $4,958 3502 $5,478 Business License Technician 4408 $3,428 4448 $4,185 4468 $4,624 City Clerk Records Management Analyst# 3470 $4,670 3510 $5,701 3530 $6,299 City Planner/Planning Manager* 2583 $8,204 2623 $10,014 2643 $11,065 Communications and Marketing Officer# 3515 $5,845 3555 $7,134 3575 $7,883 Communications Manager* 2565 $7,499 2605 $9,155 2625 $10,115 Community Improvement Manager* 2533 $6,394 2573 $7,804 2593 $8,623 Community Improvement Officer 1 4421 $3,658 4461 $4,465 4481 $4,933 Community Improvement Officer II 4441 $4,041 4481 $4,933 4501 $5,451 Community Programs Coordinator 4450 $4,227 4490 $5,160 4510 $5,701 Community Programs Specialist 4437 $3,962 4477 $4,836 4497 $5,343 Community Services Coordinator 4450 $4,227 4490 $5,160 4510 $5,701 Community Services Manager* 2506 $5,589 2546 $6,822 2566 $7,537 Community Services Marketing Coord 4450 $4,227 4490 $5,160 4510 $5,701 Community Services Project Coordinator# 3500 $5,423 3540 $6,621 3560 $7,314 Community Services Specialist 4350 $2,566 4390 $3,133 4410 $3,462 Community Services Superintendent* 2536 $6,490 2576 $7,922 2596 $8,753 Community Services Supervisor# 3480 $4,908 3520 $5,993 3540 $6,621 Community Services Technician 4437 $3,962 4477 $4,836 4497 $5,343 Community Svc Marketing Manager* 2536 $6,490 2576 $7,922 2596 $8,753 Cultural Arts Manager* 2506 $5,589 2546 $6,822 2566 $7,537 Cultural Center Manager* 2536 $6,490 2576 $7,922 2596 $8,753 Deputy City Clerk# 3430 $3,825 3470 $4,670 3490 $5,160 Deputy Dir. of Innovation and Technology* 2558 $7,242 2598 $8,840 2618 $9,769 Deputy Director of Public Works* 2566 $7,537 2606 $9,200 2626 $10,165 Engineering Aide 4421 $3,658 4461 $4,465 4481 $4,933 Engineering Technician 4441 $4,041 4481 $4,933 4501 $5,451 Environmental Programs Coordinator# 3503 $5,505 3543 $6,721 3563 $7,425 Environmental Programs Inspector 2 4464 $4,532 4504 $5,532 4524 $6,113 Environmental Programs Manager* 2539 $6,588 2579 $8,042 2599 $8,885 Executive Assistant II# 3444 $4,101 3484 $5,007 3504 $5,532 Executive Assistant' 4394 $3,197 4464 $4,532 4484 $5,007 Facilities Superintendent* 2536 $6,490 2576 $7,922 2596 $8,753 Finance Manager* 2559 $7,278 2599 $8,885 2619 $9,818 Rancho Cucamonga City Employee Association Attachment 2 August 15, 2018 Page 350 Resolution No. 18 -XXX RCCEA COVERED EMPLOYEES IN THE MID MANAGER, SUPERVISORY/PROFESSIONAL AND GENERAL EMPLOYEES GROUPS ASSIGNMENTS OF CLASSIFICATIONS TO PAY RANGES Monthly Pay Ranges Effective August 15, 2018 Minimum Control Point Maximum Fleet Su ervisor#2 3488 $5,108 3528 $6,236 3548 $6,890 Fund Development Coordinator# 3470 $4,670 3510 $5,701 3530 $6,299 GIS Analyst# 3505 $5,560 3545 $6,788 3565 $7,499 GIS Specialist 4456 $4,355 4496 $5,316 4516 $5,874 GIS Supervisor# 3535 $6,458 3575 $7,883 3595 $8,710 GIS Technician 4436 $3,941 4476 $4,811 4496 $5,316 Human Resources Clerk 4389 $3,118 4429 $3,807 4449 $4,205 Human Resources Manager* 2583 $8,204 2623 $10,014 2643 $11,065 Human Resources Technician 4399 $3,277 4439 $4,000 4459 $4,421 Information Technology Analyst 1# 3505 $5,560 3545 $6,788 3565 $7,499 Information Technology Analyst II# 3520 $5,993 3560 $7,314 3580 $8,081 Information Technology Specialist 1 4456 $4,355 4496 $5,316 4516 $5,874 Information Technology Specialist II 4471 $4,693 4511 $5,729 4531 $6,330 Information Technology Technician 4411 $3,479 4451 $4,247 4471 $4,693 Librarian 1# 3435 $3,922 3475 $4,788 3495 $5,290 Librarian 11# 3457 $4,377 3497 $5,343 3517 $5,904 Library Assistant 1# 3373 $2,878 3413 $3,514 3433 $3,883 Library Assistant 11# 3414 $37532 3454 $4,312 3474 $4,764 Library Clerk 4356 $2,645 4396 $3,228 4416 $3,567 Library Page 4244 $17513 4284 $1,847 4304 $27040 Library Page II 4293 $1,932 4333 $2,358 4353 $2,605 Library Services Manager* 2506 $57589 2546 $6,822 2566 $77537 Library Technician 4393 $3,180 4433 $3,883 4453 $4,290 Maintenance Supervisor#2 3488 $57108 3528 $6,236 3548 $67890 Management Aide 4440 $4,021 4480 $4,908 4500 $5,423 Management Analyst 1# 3470 $47670 3510 $5,701 3530 $67299 Management Analyst II# 3498 $5,369 3538 $6,556 3558 $7,242 Management Analyst III# 3515 $57845 3555 $7,134 3575 $77883 Office Services Clerk 4369 $2,822 4409 $3,445 4429 $3,807 Park/Landscape Maintenance Supt*2 2536 $6,490 2576 $7,922 2596 $87753 Payroll Supervisor# 3470 $4,670 3510 $5,701 3530 $6,299 Plan Check & Inspection Manager* 2533 $6,394 2573 $7,804 2595 $87710 Planning Specialist 4443 $4,081 4483 $4,983 4503 $5,505 Planning Technician 4423 $37694 4463 $4,509 4483 $47983 Rancho Cucamonga City Employee Association Attachment 2 August 15, 2018 Page 351 Resolution No. 18 -XXX RCCEA COVERED EMPLOYEES IN THE MID MANAGER, SUPERVISORY/PROFESSIONAL AND GENERAL EMPLOYEES GROUPS ASSIGNMENTS OF CLASSIFICATIONS TO PAY RANGES Monthly Pay Ranges Effective August 15, 2018 Minimum Control Point Maximum Plans Examiner 1 4474 $4,764 4514 $5,816 4534 $6,426 Plans Examiner ll# 3488 $5,108 3528 $6,236 3548 $6,890 Principal Accountant* 2532 $6,362 2572 $7,765 2592 $8,580 Principal Engineer* 2567 $7,575 2607 $9,246 2627 $10,216 Principal Librarian* 2495 $5,290 2535 $6,458 2555 $7,134 Principal Management Analyst* 2543 $6,721 2583 $8,204 2603 $9,064 Principal Planner* 2537 $6,523 2577 $7,962 2597 $8,796 Procurement & Contracts Analyst# 3433 $3,883 3473 $4,740 3493 $5,238 Procurement Clerk 4374 $2,893 4414 $3,532 4434 $3,903 Procurement Manager* 2530 $6,299 2570 $7,689 2590 $8,495 Procurement Technician 4411 $3,479 4451 $4,247 4471 $4,693 Public Services Technician 1 4413 $3,514 4453 $4,290 4473 $4,740 Public Services Technician 11 4423 $3,694 4463 $4,509 4483 $4,983 Public Services Technician III 4443 $4,081 4483 $4,983 4503 $5,505 Public Works Inspector 12 4444 $4,101 4484 $5,007 4504 $5,532 Public Works Inspector 112 4464 $4,532 4504 $5,532 4524 $6,113 Public Works Maintenance Manager* 2566 $7,537 2606 $9,200 2626 $10,165 Public Works Safety Coordinator #2 3468 $4,624 3508 $5,645 3528 $6,236 Records Clerk 4358 $2,671 4398 $3,261 4418 $3,603 Records Coordinator 4386 $3,071 4426 $3,750 4446 $4,143 Risk Analyst# 3433 $3,883 3473 $4,740 3493 $5,238 Risk Management Coordinator# 3470 $4,670 3510 $5,701 3530 $6,299 Senior Account Clerk 4395 $3,213 4435 $3,922 4455 $4,333 Senior Account Technician 4446 $4,143 4486 $5,058 4506 $5,589 Senior Accountant# 3498 $5,369 3538 $6,556 3558 $7,242 Senior Animal Services Officer# 3461 $4,465 3501 $5,451 3521 $6,022 Senior Building Ins ector#2 3484 $5,007 3524 $6,113 3544 $6,754 Senior Civil Engineer* 2547 $6,856 2587 $8,369 2607 $9,246 Senior Community Improvement Officer# 3461 $4,465 3501 $5,451 3521 $6,022 Senior Electrician # 3485 $5,033 3525 $6,143 3545 $6,788 Senior Executive Assistant* 2460 $4,443 2500 $5,423 2520 $5,993 Senior GIS Analyst # 3520 $5,993 3560 $7,314 3580 $8,081 Senior Information Technology Analyst# 3535 $6,458 3575 $7,883 3595 $8,710 Senior Information Technology Specialist 4493 $5,238 4533 $6,394 4553 $7,064 Rancho Cucamonga City Employee Association Attachment 2 August 15, 2018 Page 352 Resolution No. 18 -XXX RCCEA COVERED EMPLOYEES IN THE MID MANAGER, SUPERVISORY/PROFESSIONAL AND GENERAL EMPLOYEES GROUPS ASSIGNMENTS OF CLASSIFICATIONS TO PAY RANGES Monthly Pay Ranges Effective August 15, 2018 Minimum Control Point Maximum Senior Librarian# 3468 $4,624 3508 $5,645 3528 $6,236 Senior Park Planner# 3500 $5,423 3540 $6,621 3560 $7,314 Senior Planner* 2517 $5,904 2557 $7,206 2577 $7,962 Senior Plans Examiner# 3503 $5,505 3543 $6,721 3563 $7,425 Senior Procurement Technician# 3463 $4,509 3503 $5,505 3523 $6,083 Senior Risk Management Analyst# 3515 $5,845 3555 $7,134 3575 $7,883 Senior Special Districts Technician 4443 $4,081 4483 $4,983 4503 $5,505 Senior Veterinary Technician# 3461 $4,465 3501 $5,451 3521 $6,022 Special Districts Analyst# 3498 $57369 3538 $6,556 3558 $7,242 Special Districts Technician 4437 $3,962 4477 $4,836 4497 $5,343 Street/Storm Drain Maintenance Su t*2 2536 $67490 2576 $7,922 2596 $87753 Supervising Public Works Inspector#2 3494 $5,263 3534 $6,426 3554 $7,099 Theater Production Coordinator 4460 $47443 4500 $5,423 4520 $57993 Theater Production Supervisor# 3480 $4,908 3520 $5,993 3540 $6,621 Theatre Technician III 4423 $37694 4463 $4,509 4483 $47983 Traffic Engineer* 2569 $7,650 2609 $9,339 2629 $10,319 Utilities Division Manager* 2584 $87254 2624 $10,065 2644 $11,121 Utility Operations Manager* 2524 $6,113 2564 $7,462 2584 $8,254 Veterinarian* 2579 $87042 2619 $9,818 2639 $10,847 Veterinary Assistant 4407 $3,411 4447 $4,164 4467 $4,600 Veterinary Technician 4437 $3,962 4477 $4,836 4497 $5,343 When acting as Clerk to Commissions $50 paid per night or weekend day meeting. Compensatory time off 2. Refer to MOU for provision of boot # Denotes Supervisory/Professional Class * Denotes Management Class Rancho Cucamonga City Employee Association Attachment 2 August 15, 2018 Page 353 DATE: August 15, 2018 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Michael Frasure, Building & Safety Services Manager SUBJECT: SECOND READING AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 936, AMENDING CHAPTER 19.28 IN ITS ENTIRETY OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING THE LOCAL AGENCY MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR ONSITE WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council approve by second reading and adopt the Local Agency Management Plan (LAMP) clarification of errors and omissions. BACKGROUND: The introduction and first reading of the above -entitled ordinance was approved at a Regular City Council Meeting on August 1, 2018. Votes at first reading: AYES: Michael, Alexander, Kennedy, Spagnolo, Williams. ANALYSIS: Please refer to the August 1, 2018 City Council Meeting Staff Report. FISCAL IMPACT: Please refer to the August 1, 2018 City Council Meeting Staff Report. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Please refer to the August 1, 2018 City Council Meeting Staff Report. ATTACHMENTS: Description Updated pages as presented above Ordinance No. 936 Page 354 LOCAL AGENCY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Adopted by Santa Ana RWRCB: June 16, 2017 Effective: August 21, 2017 For Onsite Wastewater Treatment System Page 355 Public Water Wells Figure 1.4 on the following page shows the location of the public water wells within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. For a larger exhibit see Appendix A. Also see Potable Water Sppply. Page 356 • Soil texture — Sand is soil that is comprised of 85% or more sand particles, with the percentage of silt plus 1.5 times the percentage of clay particles comprising less than 15%. Seepage Pit, Outside Perimeter A drilled or dug excavation five (5) to seven (7) feet in diameter with a liner. It is also gravel filled (between the liner and the soil) and receives effluent discharge for dispersal from a septic tank or other OWTS treatment unit. Seepage Pit Cap A cover placed on the top of the seepage pit liner. Septage Septage, or septic tank sludge, refers to the partially treated sludge stored in a septic tank or (less commonly) in a pit latrine. It is one type of fecal sludge. Septage is a by-product from the pretreatment of household wastewater in a septic tank where it accumulates over time. Septic Tank A watertight, covered, receptacle designed for primary treatment of wastewater and constructed to: • Receive wastewater discharged from a building, • Separate settleable and floating solids from liquid, • Digest organic matter using anaerobic bacterial action, • Store digested solids, and/or • Clarify wastewater for further treatment with final subsurface discharge. Service Provider A person capable of operating, monitoring and maintaining an OWTS in accordance with this LAMP. Silt A soil particle or type of soil texture. As a: • Soil particle — Silt consists of individual rock, or mineral particles, having diameters ranging from 0.05 to 0.002mm. • Soil texture — Silt is soil that is comprised of approximately 80% or more silt particles, and not more than 12% clay particles using the USDA soil classification system. Site Page 357 Soil Type Map CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Almond St. Hillside Rd. Banyan Fool Ai s ui > d S y 7 a a' a' E m c a y s 3 LEGEND 90 SQ. FT.1100 GAL. 60 SQ. FT.1100 GAL. Figure 2.1 Page 358 CHAPTER 3 Siting Standards To ensure that Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems (OWTS) do not adversely affect water quality, the government agencies tasked with protecting the public's health and safety have developed siting standards for OWTS. This chapter provides information regarding siting standards such as minimum lot size, setback requirements (including increased setback and notification requirements for OWTS located near public water systems), natural ground slope and density. Setback Requirements The minimum separations listed herein are largely derived from the California Plumbing Code, Appendix H and are measured in feet. In some cases, additions or changes have been made in order to adequately protect public health. Where differences exist, the greater separation prevails, unless waived for cause by the City [as described in Chapter 14 - LAMP Scope of Coverage of the Local Agency Management Program (LAMP)]. The following table provides the minimum requirements for installation of OWTS for either new or existing structures. Table 3-1 Minimum Setback Required From (feet) Septic Tank Disposal Field Seepage Pit Non -Public Water Supply Well" 1100 1002 1502 Public Water Supply Well' 100 1502 200 Buildings or Structures3 5 8 8 Property line, including Street Right of Way Line 5 5 8 Streams and other flowing bodies of water9 100 100 150 Drainage Course 50 50 50 Lakes, ponds, and other surface water bodies10 200 200 200 Large Trees4 10 - 10 Seepage pits, Outside Perimeter 5 5 12 Disposal field, on Center 5 106 5 On -Site domestic water lines (building service line) 5 5 5 Public Domestic Water Lines 25 25 25 Page 359 Minimum Setback Required From (feet) Septic Tank Disposal Field Seepage Pit Distribution Box n/a 5 5 Ground surface on sloping ground n/a 15 15 Groundwater' 5 57 10 i. Drainage piping will clear domestic water supply wells by not less than 50 feet. This distance will be permitted to be reduced to not less than 25 feet where the drainage piping is constructed of materials approved for use within a building. a. For any system discharging 5,000 gallons per day (GPD), or more, the required setback will be increased to 200 feet. 3. Includes porches and steps whether covered or uncovered, breezeways, roofed porte cocheres, roofed patios, carports, covered walls, covered driveway, and similar structures or appurtenances. 4. Any tree with a trunk diameter of one foot or more within 5 feet of the system that will not be removed during construction. s. The highest known level to which groundwater is known to have occurred rather than the level at the time when testing occurred,: http://permitrack.sbcount ov/waw/ 6. Plus 2 feet for each additional foot of depth in excess of 1 foot below the bottom of the drain line. 7. For any system utilizing Alternate Treatment System and Sewage Holding Tank (Chapter 11), this minimum separation may be reduced to 2 feet with approval under the Advanced Protection Management Program (APMP) (refer to Chapter 12: Tier 3 - Advanced Protection Management Program for Impaired Areas for more information regarding the APMP) and the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). s. Unless regulatory or legitimate data requirements necessitate that monitoring wells be located closer. 9. Where the edge of the water body is the natural or levied bank for creeks and rivers, or may be less where site conditions prevent mitigation of wastewater to the water body. io. Where the edge of the water body is the high water mark for lakes and reservoirs and the mean high tide line for tidally influenced water bodies. Slope Setback Requirements On sites with natural slopes of 25% (4:1) or greater, the siting and the design of the leaching system shall be performed by recommendations from a Professional Geotechnical Engineer. The permitted grading plan and the permitted OWTS (a septic plan) shall be prepared by a Professional Civil Engineer and shall follow the recommendation in the Geotechnical report prepared by a Professional Geotechnical Engineer. Minimum Set Back Requirements When reviewing setback requirements, Page 360 Single Family Residential Developments for Additions and Accessory Structures For single family residential developments with an addition, including accessory structures, when the existing septic system will accommodate additional wastewater flows. Additional installations (i.e., rooms, bathrooms or accessory structures) will not be exempt from the minimum lot size requirements. A septic certification may be required to verify the septic tank's and disposal field's capacity to accept additional wastewater flows. When additional structures (accessory structures) are added to existing developments, and these additions will result in increased wastewater flows to the existing septic system, these developments will be considered new developments. This applies to single family residential, commercial, and/or industrial developments. OWTS Systems Replacements There will be times when the replacement of a septic tank/subsurface disposal system will be required for systems in existing residential, commercial, and industrial developments to bring the system up to code, based on requirements by Building and Safety Services Department. For single family residential developments only, replacement of the existing septic tank/ subsurface disposal system may be allowed when the system is proposed and capable to allow additional flows, which result from additions to the existing dwelling unit. Tracts. Parcels, and Commercial/Industrial Developments Tracts, parcels, and/or commercial/industrial developments which received land use approval from the City of Rancho Cucamonga prior to the effective date of the LAMP, are exempt from the minimum lot size requirements and shall not be less than one-half (1/2) acre per this chapter for the use of septic tank/subsurface disposal systems. Combined Lots Smaller than One Half Acre New lots, which are smaller than one-half acre, may be formed by combining through a lot merger two or more existing lots which have received land use approval prior to the effective date of the LAMP. Individually, these lots would be eligible for an exemption from the minimum lot size requirement. Developments on combined lots may also qualify for an exemption: • Provided the total number of units proposed for the new parcel is equal to, or less than the total number of units proposed for the existing parcel, and/or • When an alternative treatment system is utilized. When requesting to use an alternative treatment system, each system will be reviewed on a case- by-case basis, and will require the approval of Building and Safety Services, and the RWQCB. Page 361 OWTS Disposal Systems Dispersal systems for conventional OWTS in the City of Rancho Cucamonga can consist of leach lines, horizontal seepage pits and vertical seepage pits. Dispersal systems for alternative OWTS can also include subsurface drip dispersal systems. See the chapters on leach line, horizontal seepage pit, vertical seepage pit and subsurface drip dispersal systems for more specifics on sizing and design criteria for those systems. Setbacks Setbacks in layout designs refer to the required spacing in distance from components of the OWTS and to structures, property lines, easements, watercourses, wells, or grading. Specific setback requirements will vary based on the type of system design and site conditions and are specified in the following table. Table 4-1 System Component$ Setback Minimum Distance Septic Tank Structure 5 feet Septic Tank Property Line, including the street/public right-of-way 5 feet Septic Tank Water Well 100 feet Septic Tank Leach Lines 5 feet Septic Tank Seepage Pits 5 feet Leach Lines Structure 8 feet Leach Lines Property Line, including the street/public right of way 5 feet Leach Lines Water Well 100 feet ' Leach Lines Leach Lines 10 feet center to center distance (see Table 3-1, Note 6) Leach Lines Seepage Pits 5 feet Leach Lines Water Mains (Public) 25 feet or 10 feet from edge of easement Leach Lines Drainage Course 50 feet from centerline or top of bank' Page 362 System Setback Minimum Distance Component$ Seepage Pits Ground Water 10 feet (vertical) 1. The minimum setback required to a public water well is 150 feet and increases to 200 feet where the depth of the dispersal system exceeds 10 feet in depth. The minimum setback may be increased if site conditions show the minimum setback is insufficient to protect groundwater supplies. 2. Where the dispersal system is within 1200 feet of surface water intake point, the setback shall be 400 feet. Where the dispersal system is greater than 1200 feet of the surface water intake point, the setback shall be 200 feet. 3. Maximum setback of 100 feet. A reduction in setback to 50 feet may be considered with engineering to demonstrate no risk of sewage moving laterally to pipeline trench. 4. The setback may increase if the 5:1 setback to a road cut is greater than the minimum setback. 5. This maximum 100 foot setback would also be applied to the top of an eroded bank or natural slope in excess of 60%. A reduction in setback to 50 feet may be considered with engineering to demonstrate no risk of sewage surfacing on the face of the bank or slope. 6. For trenches less than 2 feet in depth, a 5:1 setback based on the trench depth can be used. 7. Setback increases to a 5:1 setback if drainage is greater than 10 foot in depth. 8. Refer to Table 3-1 for other references. Grading Plan Review Upon approval of a layout by the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Building and Safety Services Department, the City staff will indicate on the layout approval form whether a field check of completed grading is required prior to issuance of the OWTS permit. The City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Services grading approval is not the same as the Planning Department's land use agency grading approval Major and minor grading plans will be reviewed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Services prior to grading to determine impacts to the approved OWTS and adjacent properties. After completion of the grading, the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Services must be contacted to arrange for a field check, unless the field check of completed grading is waived on the layout approval. Page 363 3. Soil cover requirements must also conform to those allowed by the manufacturer of any gravel-less/chamber design. Dimensions Leach lines are to be installed according to the qualified professional's specifications for location, length, width, and depth. 2. Leach lines are to be spaced at least 10 feet apart, measured center to center. 3. Leach lines shall be installed with a width of no less than 12 inches and no more than 36 inches. Regardless of trench width or materials used, dispersal systems using leach lines shall be designed using not less than 3 square feet of infiltrative area per linear foot of trench as the infiltrative surface. No reduction in sizing is allowed for the use of chambers (see Chapter 10). 4. The minimum length of leach trench for a new OWTS using leach lines as the dispersal system shall be 200 feet regardless of the projected wastewater flows. 5. A 100% reserve area shall be required for all leach line systems. Properties that previously were required to maintain areas of 200% or 300% reserve shall now have a 100% reserve area requirement in place of the previous requirement. Materials and Construction Considerations 1. All piping and materials used in leach line systems including gravel-less/chamber systems must have IAPMO approval and must be approved by City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Services prior to installation. 2. Leach lines that utilize gravel shall be filled with clean, washed leach line rock to a point at least 4 inches above the top of a 4 inch perforated pipe and shall have a minimum of 12 inches of gravel below the pipe. The rock shall be graded at 1 to 1.5 inches in size and shall be covered with straw, untreated building paper or a geotextile fabric prior to backfill to prevent the infiltration of soil into the rock. 3. Where multiple leach lines are proposed on sloping ground, a distribution box must be used to connect the leach lines. 4. Leach lines shall NOT be placed under impermeable surfaces. Leach lines that are later covered by impermeable surfaces may not be considered as viable for purposes of determining primary and reserve area requirements. 5. Leach line trenches shall be installed with the trench bottom and materials used being level to within 2 inches per 100 feet. Page 364 Dimensions and Construction Requirements 1. Vertical seepage pits shall be installed according to the qualified professional's specifications for location, depth and cap depth. 2. The pit excavation shall be five (5), six (6) or seven (7) feet in diameter. Pit excavations greater than 7 -feet in diameter require prior approval by the Building Official. 3. The sidewall depth below the inlet shall not be less than 14 feet. 4. The minimum depth to the top of the infiltrative surface allowed is 2 feet. This depth is also known as the cap depth. There is no maximum cap depth but documentation must be provided to justify any cap depth greater than 5 feet. 5. The maximum slope allowed for the use of vertical seepage pits is 40 percent (2-1/2:1 slope). Slopes that exceed 25% (4:1) will require additional engineering and design detail as required to address the risk of effluent surfacing on the slope recognizable as sewage as well as slope stability issues. Slopes that exceed 25% (4:1) will, in most cases, require a terrace design or grading to allow for drilling access. Any grading shall be in accordance with any permit requirements for brushing, clearing, and grading from any other agency. 6. All pits must be filled with clean washed leach line rock to the cap depth. The rock shall be graded at 1 to 1.5 inches in size and shall be covered with straw, untreated building paper or a geotextile fabric prior to backfill to prevent the infiltration of soil into the rock. 7. A 4 inch Schedule 40 pipe shall be installed from the ground surface to the bottom of each seepage pit for clean-out, pumping and verification of the total pit depth. The pipe shall have perforations from the cap depth to the bottom of the pit and be of solid construction from the cap depth to the ground surface. A screw fit cap must be placed on top of the riser to allow access. 8. Where more than one vertical seepage pit is proposed for the primary or reserve system, a distribution box must be used to connect the pits. Chaining or lining the seepage pits together such that the overflow from an upstream pit flows to a downstream pit shall not be permitted. Page 365 Design Criteria for Replacement of Existing Private Sewage Disposal Systems Check Soil Type Map for Minimum Depth of Pits Table 9-1 Notes: *Absorption Perimeter 1. Other variations may be allowed to width and depth so as to achieve the required leach area. Chapter 8 2. Trenches shall not have less than 600 sq. ft. of infiltrative area. Chapter 8 3. All deviations from this handout will require a percolation test with a designed septic system by a licensed Civil Engineer based on percolation test(s) per Chapter 6 — Percolation Test Procedure. 4. Depth of the seepage pit shall be measured from the bottom of the pit to the invert of the distribution pipe. Chapter 9 5. Multiple seepage pits may be used. If this is the case, the required depth from the table above can be divided equally among the numbers of seepage pits. In no cases the depth of seepage pits can be less than the "minimum depth". Chapter 9 6. See Chapter 8 - Leach Line Systems and Chapter 9 - Vertical Seepage Pit Systems for design and construction requirements. Page 366 Minimum Seepage Pit Septic Disposal 3ft A.P.* @ 12" 5ft A.P.* @ 24" 7ft A.P.* @ 36" with Tank Leach Wide Bottom Wide Bottom Wide Bottom Min. 4ft. - Max. 6ft. Dia. Capacity Field Below Leach Line Below Leach Line Below Leach Line Liner (Gallons) (Area (A.A x Length) (A.A x Length) (A. P. x Length) (Diameterx Depth) Req'd) (See Notes: 3, 4, 5 & 6) Field Design at 60 sq. ft./100 gal. Pit Design EL (See Notes: 1, 2, 3, & 6) 60 sq. ft./100 gal. (2) 7 x 100' 1000 600 (2) 3' x 100' (4) 5' x 55' S' x 39' 6'x 32' 7' x 28' or (1) 7' x 200" 1200 720 (3) 3' x 80' (4) 5' x 66' (4) 7' x 52' 15' x 46' 6'x 38' Tx 33' 1.500 900 (3) 3' x 100' (3) 5' x 82' (3) 7' x 70' S' x 58' 6' x 48' Tx 41' it Field Design at 90 sq. ft./100 gal. Pit Design (See Notes: 1, 2, 3, & 6) 90 sq. ft./100 gal. 1000 900 (3) 3' x 100' (2) 5' x 100' (3) 7' x 64' S' x 58' 6' x 48' Tx 41' 1200 1080 (4) 3' x 90' (3) 5' x 72' (3) 7' x 78' S' x 69' 6'x 58' Tx 50' 1500 1350 (5) 3' x 90' (3) 5' x 90' (2) 7' x 100' S' x 86' 6'x 72' Tx 62' Notes: *Absorption Perimeter 1. Other variations may be allowed to width and depth so as to achieve the required leach area. Chapter 8 2. Trenches shall not have less than 600 sq. ft. of infiltrative area. Chapter 8 3. All deviations from this handout will require a percolation test with a designed septic system by a licensed Civil Engineer based on percolation test(s) per Chapter 6 — Percolation Test Procedure. 4. Depth of the seepage pit shall be measured from the bottom of the pit to the invert of the distribution pipe. Chapter 9 5. Multiple seepage pits may be used. If this is the case, the required depth from the table above can be divided equally among the numbers of seepage pits. In no cases the depth of seepage pits can be less than the "minimum depth". Chapter 9 6. See Chapter 8 - Leach Line Systems and Chapter 9 - Vertical Seepage Pit Systems for design and construction requirements. Page 366 Thomas Bros. Map coordinates; Property Lines and lot dimensions; (viii) Percent slope and direction of fall; (ix) Proposed OWTS design detail; (x) All known, recorded easements on or within 20 feet of lot boundaries (open -space, utility, road, waterline, etc.); (A) Source of potable water; Location of all public waterlines on or within 20 feet of property; (xii) Location of all wells on or within 200 feet of property; and (xiii) Any soils testing information, such as deep boring or percolation test, plotted on the design. 5. In preparing a layout design, the following setback requirements shall establish minimum spacing requirements from a component to the OWTS and to structures, property lines, easements, watercourses, wells, or grading: Table 19.28.090.B.3. OWTS Setback Requirements. System Component Setback Minimum Distance Septic Tank Structure 5 feet Septic Tank Property Line, including the street/public right-of-way 5 feet Septic Tank Water Well 100 feet Septic Tank Leach Lines 5 feet Septic Tank Seepage Pits 5 feet Septic Tank Structure 8 feet Leach Lines Property Line, including the street/public right-of-way 5 feet Leach Lines Water Well 100' feet Leach Lines Leach Lines 4 feet center to center distance (See Table 19.28.090.B.3, Note 6) Leach Lines Seepage Pits 5 feet 6 149 Page 367 ORDINANCE NO. 936 ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 19, ARTICLE 28 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ONSITE WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS A. Recitals. 1. Assembly Bill 885, enacted in 2000 by the State legislature and codified in section 13290 through 13291.7 of the Water Code, directed the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) to develop regulations or standards for onsite wastewater treatment systems (OWTS), to be implemented by qualified local agencies. The SWRCB issued those regulations in 2012 as its "Water Quality Control Policy for Siting, Design, Operation and Maintenance of Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems" (OWTS Policy). The OWTS Policy allows local agencies to approve alternative OWTS, based on a local ordinance, after approval of a Local Agency Management Program (LAMP) by the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). 2. In coordination with the Santa Ana RWQCB, the City has developed a city- wide Tier 2 LAMP addressing the required elements of the OWTS Policy. 3. On June 16, 2017, the RWQCB held a public hearing and adopted the city- wide Tier 2 LAMP by Resolution R8-2017-0012. 4. Following RWQCB approval of the city-wide Tier 2 LAMP, the City has prepared this ordinance in order to implement the LAMP. 5. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. 6. The purpose of this amended Ordinance is for clarifying errors and omissions. B. Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council hereby ordains as follows: SECTION 1. The City Council finds that the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. SECTION 2. Chapter 19.28, Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems, is hereby added to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to read as follows: "Chapter 19.28 Section 19.28.010 Purpose 1 Page 368 Section 19.28.020 Definitions Section 19.28.030 City not responsible for damage. Section 19.28.040 Public sewer; connection to. Section 19.28.050 Onsite wastewater treatment systems; when used. Section 19.28.060 Onsite wastewater treatment systems subject to Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board waste discharge requirements; City permit required; fee. Section 19.28.070 General Prohibitions, Violations. Section 19.28.080 General onsite wastewater treatment systems applicability standards; OWTS permit required. Section 19.28.090 OWTS permit application requirements. Section 19.28.100 OWTS permit fees. Section 19.28.110 Refusal to issue building permit. Section 19.28.120 Refusal to issue certification of occupancy. Section 19.28.130 State contractor's license required for installation or repair; registration fee. Section 19.28.140 Construction inspections. Section 19.28.150 Siting Standards. Section 19.28.160 Groundwater and Percolation Testing Requirements. Section 19.28.170 Septic Tank Requirements. Section 19.28.180 Leach Line System Requirements. Section 19.28.190 Vertical Seepage Pit System Requirements Section 19.28.200 Horizontal Seepage Pit Systems. Section 19.28.210 Alternative onsite wastewater treatment systems; Use of alternative systems. Section 19.28.220 Alternate onsite wastewater treatment systems siting and operational requirements; Variances permissible. I Page 369 Section 19.28.230 Sewer wells; cesspools; seepage pits. Section 19.28.240 Holding tanks; portable toilets. Section 19.28.250 OWTS located in proximity to impaired water bodies. Section 19.28.260 OWTS failures; Corrective actions required. Section 19.28.270 Substandard systems. Section 19.28.280 Abandoned onsite wastewater treatment systems. Section 19.28.290 Abatement. Section 19.28.300 Notice of violation. Section 19.28.310 Appeal from denial, revocation or suspension. ONSITE WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS 19.28.010 Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to establish standards for the approval, installation, and operation of onsite wastewater treatment systems (OWTS) within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, consistent with the appropriate California Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) standards and basin plans. The standards are adopted to prevent the creation of health hazards and nuisance conditions and to protect surface and groundwater quality. The City has prepared a Local Agency Management Program (LAMP) for OWTS permitting and regulation throughout the City, and that program has been approved the California Regional Water Quality Control Board for the Santa Ana Region. 19.28.020 Definitions. As used in this chapter, the following terms and phrases have the following meaning: Above Ground Dispersal System means a covered sand bed elevated above original ground surface with an effluent leach field located in the sand bed. Accessory Structures mean a subordinate habitable building which is incidental and not attached to the main building or use on the same lot. If an accessory building is attached to the main building or if the roof is a continuation of the main building roof, the accessory building shall be considered an addition to the main building. Includes habitable structures 3 Page 370 with sanitary sewer plumbing facilities regardless of whether a Building Permit is required, including, but not limited to, barns, guesthouses, second dwelling units, garages, storage buildings/sheds, and pool (swimming) houses/bathrooms. Basin Plan (or Water Quality Control Plan) means a plan which identifies surface and ground water bodies within each region's boundaries, and establishes for each, it's respective beneficial uses, and water quality objectives. Basin plans are adopted by the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) and State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB), and are approved by the Office of Administrative Law. Bedrock means the rock, usually solid, which underlies soil or other unconsolidated, surficial material. Building Official means the Building Official for the City of Rancho Cucamonga is the Building and Safety Services Director and is the officer or other designated authority charged with the administration and enforcement of the current adopted California Building Code, or a duly authorized representative. California Environmental Data Exchange Network (CEDEN) means a central location to find and share information about California's water bodies, including streams, lakes, rivers, and coastal oceans. CCR means California Code of Regulation (CCR, Cal. Code Regs.) is the codification of the general and permanent rules and regulations (sometimes called administrative law) announced in the California Regulatory Notice Register by California state agencies. Cesspool means an excavation in the ground receiving domestic wastewater, designed to retain the organic matter and solids, while allowing the liquids to seep into the soil. Clay is used to describe a soil particle, or type of soil texture: (i) As a soil: Particle — clay consists of individual rock or mineral particles having diameters of <0.002 millimeters (mm); (ii) As a texture — clay is a soil material that is comprised of 40%, or more, clay particles, not more than 45% sand, and not more than 40% silt particles using the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) soil classification system. Cobbles mean rock fragments measuring 76 mm (3 inches) or larger, using the USDA soil classification systems. Director means the Director of the Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Services Department. 0 Page 371 Dispersal System means a type of system for final wastewater treatment and subsurface discharge, which may include a leach field, seepage pit, mound, subsurface drip field, or evapotranspiration and infiltration bed. Domestic Wastewater means Wastewater with a measured strength less than high strength wastewater, which is discharged from plumbing fixtures, appliances and other household devices. Domestic Well means a groundwater well that provides water for human consumption and is not regulated by the SWRCB. Effluent means sewage, water, or other liquid (partially or completely treated, or in its natural state), flowing out of a septic tank, aerobic treatment unit, dispersal system, or other OWTS component. Electronic Deliverable Format (EDF) means the data standard adopted by the SWRCB for submittal of groundwater quality monitoring data to the State Water Board's Internet -accessible database system, Geotracker. Existing OWTS means an OWTS that was constructed, operating, and issued a permit prior to the effective date of the LAMP. Grease Interceptor means a passive interceptor with a rate of flow exceeding 50 gallons -per -minute located outside a building and used for separating and collecting grease from wastewater. Groundwater means water below the land surface that is at, or above, atmospheric pressure. High Strength Wastewater means Wastewater, prior to septic tank or other form of OWTS treatment component, having: (i) A 30 -day average concentration of Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) greater than 300 milligrams per liter (mg/L), and/or (ii) Total Suspended Solids (TSS) greater than 330 mg/L, and/or (iii) A Fats, Oil, and Grease (FOG) concentration greater than 100mg/L. Impaired Water Bodies1303(d) List means surface water bodies, or segments thereof, identified on the Section 303(d) list pursuant to the Federal Clean Water Act, approved by the SWRCB, and the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials (IAPMO) means an association that assists individual jurisdictions, both in the United States and abroad, to meet their specific needs by coordinating the development and adaptation of plumbing, mechanical, swimming pools, and solar energy codes. 5 Page 372 Local Agency means any subdivision of state government responsible for permitting, installation, and regulation of OWTS within its jurisdictional boundaries; typically a county, city, or special district. Local Agency Management Program (LAMP) means a program for the siting, design, operation and maintenance of OWTS, developed by a local agency, and approved by the RWQCB as an alternate method to achieve the same policy purpose as that of OWTS policy. Major Repair means a repair for an OWTS dispersal system due to surfacing wastewater effluent from the dispersal field and/or wastewater backed up into plumbing fixtures because the dispersal system is not able to percolate the design flow of wastewater associated with the structure served, or for a septic tank as a result of compartment baffle failure, or tank structural integrity; failure such that either wastewater is exfiltrating, or groundwater is infiltrating. Mottling means a soil condition that: (i) Results from oxidizing or reducing minerals due to soil moisture changes from saturated to unsaturated over time, and/or (ii) Is characterized by spots or blotches of different colors or, shades of color (grays and reds), interspersed within the dominant color as described by the USDA soil classification system, and/or (iii) May indicate historic seasonal high ground water levels. Mound System means an above ground dispersal system, having subsurface discharge, used to enhance soil treatment, dispersal, and absorption of effluent discharged from an OWTS treatment unit (e.g., septic tank). National Sanitation Foundation (NSF) International means a not for profit, non-governmental organization which develops health and safety standards, and performs product certification. New Development means a proposed tract, parcel, industrial, or commercial development which has not been granted one or more of the following, on or prior to approval of the LAMP: (i) Approval, or conditional approval, of a tentative parcel or tract map by the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and/or (ii) A conditional use permit, and/or (iii) Approval, or conditional approval, from the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department, and/or Building and Safety Services Department. New OWTS means an OWTS permitted after the effective date of this LAMP. Notice of Condition means a site specific document that is provided to the customer by Building and Safety Services. It is the owner's responsibility to ensure the document is recorded with the County Recorder's office. 0 Page 373 OWTS means onsite wastewater treatment systems that use subsurface disposal, including: individual; community collection and disposal; and alternative collection and disposal systems. This is also referred to as a Private Sewage Disposal System in the current adopted California Plumbing Code and may also be referred to in general vernacular by the public as a "septic system". The definition of OWTS does not include "graywater" systems pursuant to California Health and Safety Code, Section 17922.12. Percolation Test means a method of testing water absorption of the soil by using clean water to determine the dispersal system design. Permit means a document issued by a local agency that allows the installation, use, and/or monitoring of an OWTS. Projected Flows mean wastewater flows into the OWTS determined in accordance with any of the applicable methods for determining average daily flow in the California Plumbing Code. Public Water System means a system for the provision of water for human consumption, through pipes or other constructed conveyances, that has 15 or more service connections (or regularly serves at least 25 individuals daily), at least 60 days out of the year. Per California Health and Safety Code Section 116275(h), a public water system includes any: (i) Collection, treatment storage, and distribution facilities under control of the operator of the system that are used primarily in connection with the system; (ii) Collection or pretreatment storage facilities not under the control of the operator that are used primarily in connection with the system; (iii) Water system that treats water on behalf of one or more public water systems for the purpose of rendering it safe for human consumption. Public Water Well means a ground water well serving a public water system. Qualified Professional means an individual licensed, or certified by a State of California agency, to design OWTS and practice as a professional for other associated reports, as allowed under their license or registration. Qualified Professionals include the following: (i) Professional Civil Engineers; (ii) Certified Engineering Geologists; (iii) Registered Environmental Health Specialists (REHSs); (iv) Registered Geologists; and (v) Geotechnical Engineers. Replacement OWTS means an OWTS that, after the effective date of this LAMP, has its treatment capacity expanded or its dispersal system replaced or added onto. Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) means a regional water board that regulates wastewater discharges to surface water (rivers, ocean, etc.) and to groundwater (via land). It also regulates storm water discharges 7 Page 374 from construction, industrial, and municipal activities; discharges from irrigated agriculture; dredge and several other activities with practices that could degrade water quality. Sand means a soil particle or type of soil texture. As a: (i) Soil particle — and consists of individual rock, or mineral particles, having diameters ranging from 0.05 to 2.Omm; and (ii) Soil texture — Sand is soil that is comprised of 85% or more sand particles, with the percentage of silt plus 1.5 times the percentage of clay particles comprising less than 15%. Seepage Pit, Outside Perimeter means a drilled or dug excavation five (5) to seven (7) feet in diameter with a liner. It is also gravel filled (between the liner and the soil) and receives effluent discharge for dispersal from a septic tank or other OWTS treatment unit. Seepage Pit Cap means a cover placed on the top of the seepage pit liner. Septage means septic tank sludge, in particular the partially treated sludge stored in a septic tank or (less commonly) in a pit latrine. It is one type of fecal sludge. Septage is a by-product from the pretreatment of household wastewater in a septic tank where it accumulates over time. Septic Tank means a watertight, covered, receptacle designed for primary treatment of wastewater and constructed to: (i) Receive wastewater discharged from a building; (ii) Separate settleable and floating solids from liquid; (iii) Digest organic matter using anaerobic bacterial action; (iv) Store digested solids, and/or (v) Clarify wastewater for further treatment with final subsurface discharge. Service Provider means a person capable of operating, monitoring and maintaining an OWTS in accordance with this chapter. Silt means a soil particle or type of soil texture. As a: (i) Soil particle — Silt consists of individual rock, or mineral particles, having diameters ranging from 0.05 to 0.002mm; (ii) Soil texture — Silt is soil that is comprised of approximately 80% or more silt particles, and not more than 12% clay particles using the USDA soil classification system. Site means the location of the OWTS and/or a reserve dispersal area, capable of disposing 100% of the design flow from all the sources the OWTS is intended to serve. Site Evaluation means an assessment of the characteristics of the site, sufficient to determine its suitability for an OWTS that meets the requirements of this LAMP. Soil means the naturally occurring body of porous mineral and organic materials on the land surface, which is composed of: (i) Unconsolidated Page 375 materials, including sand, silt, and clay sized particles; (ii) Varying amounts of larger fragments and organic matter; (iii) Earthen material with particles smaller than 0.08 inches (2mm) in size. Soil Texture means the soil class that describes the relative amount of sand, clay, silt, and combinations thereof. State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) means the five member State Water Board, which develops statewide water protection plans and establishes water quality standards. Supplemental Treatment means any OWTS, or component thereof, which performs additional wastewater treatment so the effluent meets performance requirements prior to the discharge of effluent into the dispersal field. This excludes septic and/or dosing tanks. Structure means a new separate stand-alone building which is separate from the main structure and does not have a common roof line with the main structure and which requires a plumbing permit. Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program (SWAMP) means a unifying program created to fulfill the Legislature's mandate for the coordination of all water quality monitoring conducted by the State and RWQCBs. It is managed by a roundtable of monitoring coordinators from the SWRCB and nine RWQCBs. Telemetric means the ability to automatically measure and transmit OWTS data by wire, radio, or other means. Total Coliform means a group of bacteria consisting of several genera belonging to the family Enterobacteriaceae, which includes Escherichia coli (E. coli) bacteria. Tract means the development of more than one (1) lot or parcel, and/or more than one (1) structure discharging sewage wastes. USDA means the United States Department of Agriculture which provides leadership regarding food, agriculture, natural resources, and related issues. Waste Discharge Requirement means a permit issued for operation and discharge of waste pursuant to California Water Code Section 13260. 19.28.030 City not responsible for damage. The city is not liable or responsible for damage resulting from the defective construction of any OWTS as herein provided, nor will the city or any official 9 Page 376 or employee thereof be liable or responsible by reason of any inspection authorized hereunder. 19.28.040 Public sewer; connection to. A. Every property where there is proposed a residence, place of business, or other building or place which people occupy, or where persons congregate, reside, or are employed, and which abuts a street or alley located within an established sewer service district and outside such districts where required by the RWQCB, or which property line is within 200 feet of an approved available sanitary sewer, must be connected to the sanitary sewer in the most direct manner possible, provided a right-of-way and any necessary approval from the sewer service provider is first obtained. B. On property where an OWTS exists, and where such property abuts a street or alley located within an established sewer service district and outside such districts where required by the RWQCB, or which property line is within 200 feet of an approved available sanitary sewer, connection to the available sanitary sewer will be required at the time of system failure or when the building is remodeled, increased in square footage or altered in a manner as to change uninhabitable space into habitable space provided any necessary approval from the appropriate sewer authority is first obtained. C. The 200 foot connection requirement in subsections A and B above shall increase by 100 feet for each additional dwelling unit for any development in excess of a single family dwelling. For example, a 10 unit development will be required to connect to an available sanitary sewer if the sanitary sewer is within 1,100 feet [200 + (9 x 100 feet) = 1,100 feet] of the proposed development. 19.28.050 Onsite wastewater treatment systems; when used. A. Every residence, place of business, or other building, or place where persons congregate, reside, or are employed, and which cannot be connected to a sanitary sewer, must be provided with a water flush toilet connected to an approved OWTS. B. Every building, structure, or appurtenance that contains one or more waste producing fixtures such as toilets, sinks, showers or bathtubs, clothes washing machines, dish washing machines, animal wash pads, floor drains or other fixture or fittings intended to drain organic or inorganic waste material must be connected to an approved OWTS that meets the requirements of this chapter. C. Subject to local zoning restrictions and planning approval, multiple buildings on the same parcel, such as a main house and detached 10 Page 377 living unit or two or more agricultural housing units, may be served by a common OWTS located on that parcel, provided the OWTS is determined to have sufficient treatment and dispersal capacity for the expected wastewater flow from all buildings or facilities connected to the OWTS. 19.28.060 Onsite wastewater treatment systems subject to Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board waste discharge requirements; City permit required; fee. A. Review and approval by the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board is required for OWTS in cases where: (a) the peak wastewater flow handled by the OWTS is more than 10,000 gallons per day; (b) the OWTS is a categorized as a community system, which serves multiple discharges under separate ownership; (c) OWTS receiving high strength wastewater, unless the waste stream: (i) is from a commercial food service facility with BOD less than 900 mg/L and (ii) has a properly functioning oil/grease interceptor; (d) wastewater treatment plants of any kind or size; or (e) the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board has otherwise determined that their review and approval is necessary and appropriate for water quality protection. OWTS that are subject to the requirements and approval of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board are also required to obtain approval of the Director in accordance with the following: 1. The proposed system must be designed to accommodate the waste discharge consistent with the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board. 2. The Director will require engineered sewerage plans to be submitted by a registered civil engineer or a registered environmental health specialist with experience in OWTS design before issuing a permit. 3. A registered civil engineer, professional geologist or a registered environmental health specialist will be required to inspect the construction of the OWTS and, upon completion, to submit a letter of certification to the Director verifying the proper installation and operation of the OWTS; 4. Site evaluations, plan submittals, design and construction details, inspection, and operation and maintenance shall be consistent with guidelines and procedures prescribed by this chapter. 5. The applicant must obtain a permit(s) from the Director and pay a permit fee(s) in an amount established by resolution of the city council. Obtaining a land use permit of approval is not a substitute for an 11 Page 378 OWTS permit issued by the Building and Safety Services Department, nor does it guarantee issuance of an OWTS permit. 19.28.070 General Prohibitions, Violations. A. No person may construct, add to, repair, alter or maintain any OWTS, sewer pipes or conduits, or any other conduits for the treatment or discharge of sewage, impure waters, or any matter or substance offensive, injurious, or dangerous to health so as to cause any of the following to occur: 1. Sewage, impure waters, or any matter or substance offensive, injurious, or dangerous to health to empty, flow, seep, or drain onto the surface of any land. 2. Sewage, impure waters, or any matter or substance offensive, injurious, or dangerous to health to empty, flow, seep, drain into, or affect any well, spring, stream, river, lake, or other waters. 3. Result in any condition which, in the opinion of the director, is unsafe or dangerous, or creates a nuisance. B. A violation of this section is hereby declared a public nuisance. 19.28.080 General onsite wastewater treatment systems applicability standards; OWTS permit required. When a community sanitary sewer is not available and the property improvement will generate wastewater, the property owner must obtain an OWTS Permit from the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Services Department. Any person, association, partnership or corporation desiring an OWTS Permit shall make an application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Services Department on a form provided by the City. In addition to any requirements outlined in this chapter 19.28, a lot will be deemed to support onsite wastewater disposal if the OWTS permit applicant demonstrates the following: A. Soils are conducive to onsite wastewater disposal; B. A sanitary sewer is not available within 200 feet of the lot; an additional 100 feet shall be added per each dwelling unit proposed thereafter; C. Enough area is available to install an OWTS that meets property setbacks. For new construction, 100% expansion area must be available; 12 Page 379 D. OWTS will not impact ground or surface water quality; E. OWTS is appropriately sized to serve the intended land use; and F. For new industrial or commercial development projects utilizing septic tank -subsurface disposal systems, the wastewater flow for each one-half acre gross area of land may not exceed that from a three-bedroom, two -bathroom single family -dwelling unit. For determining compliance with this criterion, a flow rate of 300 gallons per day shall be considered as the flow equivalent to that from a three-bedroom, two-bedroom single-family dwelling unit. Exemptions will not be granted for industrial or commercial parcels less than gross one-half acre in size. 19.28.090 OWTS permit application requirements. The OWTS permit application shall be submitted on a form provided by the City. In accordance with the requirements of the OWTS permit application, the OWTS permit applicant must prepare and submit the following supplemental documents: (i) a percolation test, (ii) a proposed layout design, (iii) a grading plan, (iv) a building plan, (v) access to a potable water supply, (vi) and all preliminary plans required for all necessary grading and building permits. These supplemental documents shall be prepared as follows: A. Percolation Test Required. A percolation test is required when grading or other soil disturbance has occurred in the proposed OWTS location or if the applicant desires not to use the City's standard percolation rates. The applicant shall submit a percolation test report and design as performed by a registered civil engineer, registered geologist licensed by the State of California Board of Professional Engineers. All percolation testing shall be performed in accordance with Section 9.28.160. B. Layout Design Required. With percolation test data and other data in hand, the applicant must develop and submit a Layout Design for the proposed building project and specific OWTS, for review by the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Services Department. All OWTS layout design proposals shall demonstrate a one hundred (100%) percent reserve area for the active OWTS. The Layout Design must take percolation test data into account. In some cases, additional testing will include depth to groundwater measurements during a normal average rainfall year. In the alternative, the applicant may use the depth to ground water value used by the County of San Bernardino Stormwater Facility Mapping Tool. In some cases, the City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Page 380 Building and Safety may conclude that a conventional or alternative OWTS cannot be safely used on the lot. Due to the potential for delays or disapproval, City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety recommends that applicants submit a Layout Design and obtain an approval before incurring costs for detailed building plans and architectural fees. The approved Layout Design will state whether a field check of completed grading by the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Services is required. The Layout Design Approval shall expire after one year from the date of issuance. 1. A layout design drawing of the proposed building construction and OWTS is required. This drawing should be prepared using standard engineer's scale on 8.5" x 11" or 11" x 17" minimum size paper. The basis for the OWTS design will be from percolation testing data and/or conditions of approval from a recorded subdivision map, parcel map, boundary adjustment, or certificate of compliance. The size of the OWTS is a function of the anticipated peak sewage flow based on the number of bedrooms, dwellings or use, and the percolation rate of the soil on the site. 2. The layout design must include the property drawn to the following minimum scales: (i) Single Family Home or Small Commercial Properties — 1 inch = 30 feet; (ii) Parcel Map, Subdivisions, Large Commercial Properties - 1 inch = 40 feet and must also show the proposed system, and 100% expansion area, including existing and potential structures, wells, streams, contours, significant vegetation (including trees), rock outcroppings, the location of all borings/tests, and the proposed house pad. 3. The proposed dwelling or development site must be located so the initial subsurface sewage disposal system (and the required 100% expansion area) functions by gravity flow, unless otherwise approved. When leach lines or pits serve a common system for two or more units, add 30% more square footage to the total absorption area, if approved by the Planning Department and Building and Safety Services Department. 4. The Layout Design shall contain the following information: (i) Site Address; (ii) Owner's Name, mailing address, and phone number; Consultant's/Contractor's name, mailing address, and phone number; (iii) Type of proposed construction residential vs. commercial); (iv) Number of existing or proposed bedrooms; (v) Purpose of project (e.g. new 14 Page 381 dwelling, new structure, guesthouse, an addition, etc.); (vi) Specify scope of work; (vii) Vicinity Map, Scale, North arrow, Thomas Bros. Map coordinates; Property Lines and lot dimensions; (viii) Percent slope and direction of fall; (ix) Proposed OWTS design detail; (x) All known, recorded easements on or within 20 feet of lot boundaries (open -space, utility, road, waterline, etc.); (xi) Source of potable water; Location of all public waterlines on or within 20 feet of property; (xii) Location of all wells on or within 200 feet of property; and (xiii) Any soils testing information, such as deep boring or percolation test, plotted on the design. 5. In preparing a layout design, the following setback requirements shall establish minimum spacing requirements from a component to the OWTS and to structures, property lines, easements, watercourses, wells, or grading: Table 19.28.090.8.3. OWTS Setback Requirements. System Component Setback Minimum Distance Septic Tank Structure 5 feet Septic Tank Property Line, including the street/public right-of-way 5 feet Septic Tank Water Well 100 feet Septic Tank Leach Lines 5 feet Septic Tank Seepage Pits 5 feet Leach Lines Structure 8 feet Leach Lines Property Line, including the street/public right-of-way 5 feet Leach Lines Water Well 100' feet Leach Lines Leach Lines 10 feet center to center distance (See Table 19.28.090.B.3, Note 6) Leach Lines Seepage Pits 5 feet Leach Lines Water Mains (Public) 25 feet or 10 feet from the edge of easement 15 Page 382 Leach Lines Drainage Course 50 feet from centerline or top of bank' Leach Lines Flowing Stream/Creek 100 feet from spillway elevation Leach Lines Pond or Lake 100 feet from the high water line Leach Lines Water Supply Reservoir 200 to 400 feet from the high water line Leach Lines Aqueduct 5:1 setback to pipeline Leach Lines Road Easements/ Right -of- 5 feet from the edge of way ultimate easement width' Leach Lines Cut Slopes 5:1 setback from top of cut slopes Leach Lines Private Utility Trenches 56 feet Leach Lines Ground Water 5 (vertical) feet Seepage Pits Structure 8 feet Seepage Pits Property Line, including the 8 feet street/public right-of-way Seepage Pits Water Well 150' feet Seepage Pits Seepage Pits 12 feet from edge of excavation Seepage Pits Water Mains (Public) 25 feet or 10 feet from edge of easement Seepage Pits Drainage Course 50 feet from centerline or top of bank' Seepage Pits Flowing Stream/Creek 100 feet from edge of flow line or top of bank Seepage Pits Pond or Lake 100 feet from the spillway elevation 16 Page 383 Seepage Pits Water Supply Reservoir 200 to 400 feet from the high water line' Seepage Pits Aqueduct 5:1 setback to pipeline3 Seepage Pits Road Easements/ Right -of- way 8 feet from edge of ultimate easement width4 Seepage Pits Cut Slopes 5:1 set back from top of cut slopes Seepage Pits Private Utility Trenches 56 feet Seepage Pits Groundwater 10 feet (vertical) Notes: 1. The minimum setback required to a public water well is 150 feet and increases to 200 feet where the depth of the dispersal system exceeds 10 feet in depth. The minimum setback may be increased if site conditions show the minimum setback is insufficient to protect groundwater supplies. 2. Where the dispersal system is within 1200 feet of surface water intake point, the setback shall be 400 feet. Where the dispersal system is greater than 1200 feet of the surface water intake point, the setback shall be 200 feet. 3. Maximum setback of 100 feet. A reduction in setback to 50 feet may be considered with engineering to demonstrate no risk of sewage moving laterally to pipeline trench. 4. The setback may increase if the 5:1 setback to a road cut is greater than the minimum setback. 5. This maximum 100 -foot setback would also be applied to the top of an eroded bank or natural slope in excess of 60%. A reduction in setback to 50 feet may be considered with engineering to demonstrate no risk of sewage surfacing on the face of the bank or slope. 6. For trenches less than 2 feet in depth, a 5:1 setback based on the trench depth can be used. 7. Setback increases to a 5:1 setback if drainage is greater than 10 foot in depth. 17 Page 384 8. Refer to 19.28.090 "Siting Requirements" for other references. C. Grading Plan Review. Following Layout Design Review, a Grading Plan Review may be required by the Building and Safety Services Department as a condition of approval of the OWTS Layout Design. A field check may also be required upon completion of grading. D. Building Plan Review. Plans for a new or second dwellings must be submitted to the Planning Services Department for processing and approval. Upon submittal of the plans, the owner/agent shall meet with staff at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Services counter for a verification of bedrooms and plot plan concurrence with the approved layout. Bedrooms are used to determine the potential occupancy of a dwelling and therefore the potential amount of wastewater that will be generated. Guidelines for Determining the Number of Bedrooms: 1. Once the living room, dining room, family room, kitchen, bathrooms, and utility rooms have been established, all other rooms shall be considered as potential sleeping rooms. Dens, libraries, studies, weight rooms, sewing rooms, workshops, etc., shall be determined as bedrooms if they do not conform to the criteria listed below. 2. All other habitable rooms totaling at least seventy (70) square feet in size are to be considered bedrooms suitable for sleeping purposes, regardless of whether or not they contain closets or have direct access to a bathroom. 3. Rooms that open to a living room, dining room, family room, kitchen, or entry way, and have a single, un -obstructive opening (no doors) with a minimum 50% opening of the total wall space (minimum 6' wide) with archways or other acceptable means shall not be considered as bedrooms, due to the lack of personal privacy presented by the opening. 4. Rooms that can only be accessed through another bedroom are to be considered part of that bedroom, such as master suite and not an additional bedroom. 5. Any cases, which will require the relocation or modification of doorways, are to be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department and Building and Safety Services to address any structural considerations such as load bearing walls. This is to be done prior to approval or sign -off by the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Services. 18 Page 385 E. Proof of Potable Water Supply Required. The applicant must demonstrate the proposed development's access to a potable water supply. A public water supply should be confirmed with proof of a service availability letter from the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), or a water bill showing the property is served by a local water agency. The use of any new domestic water well will require proof of potability and be subject to reviews and approvals by all agencies involved. A copy of the Well Laboratory Report that indicates the absence of bacteria and nitrate contamination of less than 10 mg/1 of Nitrate -N or 45 mg/1 of nitrate will be necessary for proof of potability of a private well. The date of the test cannot be more than one year old. If a valid test does not exist, the well must be sampled by client's consultant for bacteriological and nitrate levels. Hand -dug water wells will not be accepted as a potable water supply. F. The applicant shall submit all preliminary plans and applications to the Planning Services Department for review prior to obtaining all necessary grading and building permits. G. An OWTS installation permit will be valid for one hundred eighty (180) days, which period shall commence at the date of issuance. Upon the expiration of the initial one hundred eighty (180) day period, the property owner or contractor may request an extension of an additional one hundred eighty (180) day period. H. Once the OWTS installation permit has been obtained, the OWTS may be installed. The OWTS shall be inspected by the city Building and Safety Services Department before the system may be backfilled. If inspection is satisfactory, the city shall approve a final OWTS permit. Any change in the OWTS plans after the issuance of a permit must first be approved by the Director. Failure to obtain approval from the Director will invalidate the permit. I. The approval or permit cannot be transferred. Failure to obtain an OWTS permit from the Department of Building and Safety Services is a violation of this chapter. The Director may revoke a permit or approval issued pursuant to this chapter in case of any false statement, or misrepresentation of fact in the application or on the plans on which the permit or approval was based. 19.28.100 OWTS permit fees. Permit fees for OWTS subject to this chapter and all related fees will be an amount established by resolution of the City Council. 19.28.110 Refusal to issue building permit. 19 Page 386 No building permit may be issued for any building requiring a sewage disposal system that is not to be connected to an approved sanitary sewer unless the applicant has received an OWTS permit. 19.28.120 Refusal to issue certification of occupancy. A. No certification of occupancy may be issued for any building that is not connected to an approved sanitary sewer unless the applicant has received an OWTS permit. B. No person may occupy or otherwise use any premises or building that has not been connected to an approved sanitary sewer or approved OWTS. 19.28.130 State contractor's license required for installation or repair; registration fee. A. No person may install, construct, alter, enlarge, reconstruct, replace, improve, recondition or repair an OWTS pursuant to this chapter unless: the person possesses a general engineering contractor's license (class A) as defined in section 7056 of the Business and Professions Code, or a Class C-42 sanitation system contractor's license or Class C-36 plumbing contractor's license from the Contractors State License Board of the State of California. B. The property owner may construct or repair an OWTS on his/her own property, which system serves or will serve the building on the property that is neither being offered for sale nor intended to be so offered, provided: 1. Persons hired by the owner to do the subject work must comply with section 19.28.080(a); or 2. Persons hired by the owner must be hired as employees of the owner and the owner must provide workman's compensation insurance, as required by law; and 3. An OWTS permit is first obtained. 19.28.140 Construction inspections. A stamped copy of the building plans for the approved OWTS must be kept available at the jobsite during system installation and until the system passes final inspection by the Director of Building and Safety Services. Inspections of each new installation must be made to ensure compliance with all the requirements of this Code. Requests for inspection must be made at least one business day in advance of the commencement of work. In the event the Director of Building and Safety Services determines there 20 Page 387 has been an improper installation, a stop -work order may be posted on the jobsite. Before any further work is done on a posted system, clearance from the Director of Building and Safety Services must be obtained. 19.28.150 Siting Standards. A. Setback Requirements. The following table provides the minimum requirements for the installation of OWTS for either new or existing structures. Table 19.28.150.A. Setback Requirements. Minimum Setback Required From (feet) Septic Tank Disposal Field Seepage Pit Non -Public Water Supply Well' 8,8 1008 1002 1502 Public Water Supply Well' 100 1502 200 Buildings or Structures3 5 8 8 Property line, including Street Right of Way Line 5 5 8 Streams and other flowing bodies of water' 100 100 150 Drainage Course 50 50 50 Lakes, ponds, and other surface water bodies10 200 200 200 Large Trees4 10 - 10 Seepage pits, Outside Perimeter 5 5 12 Disposal field, on Center 5 106 5 Onsite domestic water lines (building service line) 5 5 5 Public Domestic Water Lines 25 25 25 Distribution Box n/a 5 5 Ground surface on sloping ground n/a 15 15 Groundwater5 5 57 10 21 Page 388 Notes: 1. Drainage piping will clear domestic water supply wells by not less than 50 feet. This distance will be permitted to be reduced to not less than 25 feet where the drainage piping is constructed of materials approved for use within a building. If the dispersal system does not exceed 10 feet in depth, then the horizontal sanitary setback will be 150 feet. If the dispersal system exceeds 10 feet in depth, then the horizontal sanitary setback will be 200 feet. If the dispersal system exceeds 20 feet in depth, then the horizontal sanitary setback will be 600 feet. 2. For any system discharging 5,000 gallons per day (GPD), or more, the required setback will be increased to 200 feet. 3. Includes porches and steps whether covered or uncovered, breezeways, roofed porte cocheres, roofed patios, carports, covered walls, covered driveway, and similar structures or appurtenances. 4. Any tree with a trunk diameter of one foot or more within 5 feet of the system that will not be removed during construction. 5. The highest known level to which groundwater is known to have occurred rather than the level at the time when testing occurred. 6. Plus 2 feet for each additional foot or depth in excess of 1 foot below the bottom of the drain line. 7. For any system utilizing Alternate Treatment System and Sewage Holding Tank (Chapter 11), this minimum separation may be reduced to 2 feet with approval under the Advanced Protection Management Program (APMP) (refer to Chapter 12: Tier 3 - Advanced Protection Management Program for Impaired Areas for more information regarding the APMP) and the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). 8. Unless regulatory or legitimate data requirements necessitate that monitoring wells be located closer. 9. Where the edge of the water body is the natural or levied bank for creeks and rivers, or may be less where site conditions prevent mitigation of wastewater to the water body. 10. Where the edge of the water body is the high water mark for lakes and reservoirs and the mean high tide line for tidally influenced water bodies. 22 Page 389 B. On sites with natural slopes of 25% or greater, the siting and design of the leaching system shall be performed in accordance with recommendations prepared by a licensed professional geotechnical engineer. C. Criteria specified in Table 19.28.150.A, above must be met within the area of the proposed system and within the 100% expansion area for the proposed system. Depth of earth cover required over the dispersal field is twelve (12") inches. When the dispersal field cannot be installed twelve inches below the ground surface, and meet the above separation requirements, then a supplemental treatment system will be required. D. OWTS located near public water systems shall be subject to increased setback requirements, such as OWTS located with 1200 feet of a surface water intake. E. Density and minimum lot size requirements. All new development requires a minimum lot size of one-half acre (21,780 square feet), average gross, per dwelling unit, including accessory structures, is required for all new developments, which do not have access to a public sewer as required under 19.28.040 of this chapter. The public street area adjacent to the net lot area may count towards the minimum one-half acre gross lot size for OWTS. For new development for industrial or commercial properties, the wastewater flow for each one-half acre of land may not exceed that from a single dwelling unit. When determining compliance with this criterion, a flow rate of 300 gallons per day will be considered equivalent to a single-family dwelling unit. This flow rate shall be prorated for commercial or industrial developments with lots smaller than one-half acre, or the equivalent of 20 fixture units. F. Minimum Lot Size Exemptions. 1. The minimum lot size requirements do not apply to existing properties with OWTS which were installed prior to the effective date of this chapter. 2. New development occurring upon single family residences with existing septic systems that will accommodate additional wastewater flows, caused by additional installations such as rooms, bathrooms or accessory structures. A septic certification may be required to verify the septic tank and disposal field capacity to accept additional wastewater flows. 3. Tracts, parcels, and/or commercial/industrial developments which received land use approval from the City of Rancho 23 Page 390 Cucamonga prior to August 21, 2017 are exempt from the minimum lot size requirements and shall not be less than one- half acre per this chapter for the use of septic tank subsurface disposal systems. 4. New lots, which are smaller than one-half acre, may be formed by combining through a lot merger two or more existing lots which have received land use approval prior to the effective date of the LAMP. Individually, these lots would be eligible for an exemption from the minimum lot size requirement. Developments on combined lots may also qualify for an exemption provided that the total number of units proposed for the new parcel is equal to, or less than the total number of units proposed for the existing parcel and/or when an alternative treatment system is utilized. When requesting to use an alternative treatment system, each system will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis, and will require the approval of Building and Safety Services and the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board. 19.28.160 Groundwater and Percolation Testing Requirements. A. Groundwater Testing Procedures. 1. Test borings in the area of an OWTS shall extend to a minimum of 15 feet unless refusal is reached. Deeper depths may be required depending on site-specific conditions as determined by the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Services or the project qualified professional. Site- specific conditions may include, but not be limited to; the proposed depth of the system, local geology, soil types encountered, elevation and terrain, features on site, evidence and/or knowledge of historic ground water levels in the area, and the anticipated fluctuation of the groundwater table in times of normal to above normal annual rainfall. 2. Test borings in the area of a vertical seepage pit or horizontal seepage pit system shall extend to at least 10 feet deeper than the bottom of the proposed pit(s). 3. Since groundwater does not always immediately flow into a test boring, the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Services requires a minimum of 72 hours pass before an accurate groundwater measurement is taken. The qualified professional and/or the property owner maintain full responsibility for protecting the public from any hazards related to the test borings. It is recommended that all test 24 Page 391 borings that encounter groundwater be converted to observation wells so the groundwater conditions can be monitored over time. 4. If the qualified professional does not wish to complete the test borings as observation wells, they can cover the test boring, place safeguards around the borings to prevent unauthorized access and make an appointment for the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Services staff to observe the boring at least 72 -hours after the boring has been completed. 5. During periods of below normal average rainfall, or after periods of drought where there has not yet been sufficient ground water recharge, the absence of groundwater in test borings in areas where groundwater is suspect may not mean that approval to issue a septic tank permit can be granted. It may be necessary for the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Services and the qualified professional to monitor the test borings for a sufficient period of time to determine where groundwater will rise to during normal to above normal rainfall. B. Percolation Testing Procedure. All percolation testing for dispersal systems except vertical seepage pits in the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall be conducted through the use of the following procedures. The test shall be performed by or under the direct supervision of a California registered professional engineer or geologist. Any deviation shall be authorized only after receiving written approval by the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Services. Percolation testing shall be required for all new OWTS for non-residential development and for residential development comprising more than one dwelling unit, where a percolation report has not previously been completed. A one -lot custom single family home may use the city's currently adopted California Plumbing Code, Appendix H — Private Sewage Disposal Systems, Section H 3.0 - Area of Disposal Fields and Seepage Pits, and the included Table H 2.1(2) — Design Criteria of Five Typical Soils for the design of the seepage pit or the leech field. Test Holes. A minimum of four test holes is required when percolation rates are less than 60 minutes per inch (mpi). A minimum of six test holes is required when the average percolation rate is more than 60 mpi. Additional test holes may be necessary on a site specific basis for reasons that include, but are not limited to the following: (i) Unacceptable or failed tests; (ii) Areas of the disposal field requiring defined limits for 25 Page 392 exclusion; (iii) The disposal system is located out of a concentrated area; and (iv) Soil conditions are variable or inconsistent. All test holes shall be representative of the dispersal system installation depth. If the proposed development site has any of the following characteristics, test holes must be extended below the proposed dispersal system installation depth: (i) Shallow or consolidated rock or impervious soil layers; (ii) slopes exceeding twenty-five (25%) percent; or (iii) other factors as might be determined by sound geotechnical engineering practices. 2. There shall be a minimum of ten (10) feet of soil above any imperious formation such as rock, clay, adobe, and/or water table. Fractured rock and consolidated granites will not be considered as soil. Deep testing may be required to ensure uniform conditions exist below the disposal field. 3. Depending upon the scope of grading for a project, the Planning Department may require a conceptual grading plan and Building and Safety Services may require a grading plan. If a grading plan is required it should be included with the percolation report submittal. A grading plan helps Building and Safety Services ensure testing was done at the correct depths. Where grading is expected, include the original and finished elevations in the grading plan. For details on how to complete a grading plan contact the Building and Safety Services Department. 4. Percolation testing shall be conducted by, and all accompanying reports prepared by a Qualified Professional. 5. Prior to reviewing a percolation test, Building and Safety Service may require a site evaluation during percolation testing to ensure proper system design, and evaluate site location to ensure that the system will be in compliance. For soil to be considered uniform, test results must fall with twenty-five (25%) percent of the mean percolation rate. Determining the number of percolation tests required will be based on soil conditions and project type. 6. For areas which are primarily Sandy Loam or Sandy Clay, a field design of 60 square feet per 100 gallons. 7. For areas which are primarily Clay wither considerable sand or gravel, a field design of 90 square feet per 100 gallons. 26 Page 393 8. Percolation rates in excess of 120 minutes per inch shall be deemed conclusive evidence that the soil is impermeable is not suitable for an OWTS. C. Percolation Testing Reports. All testing data and required result information shall be submitted to City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Services on forms approved by the city. A minimum of three copies is required. All reports shall be signed with an original signature and seal by the consultant who either performed or supervised the testing. All percolation testing is to be performed by a licensed civil engineer or geologist registered in the State of California. 19.28.170 Septic Tank Requirements. A. All conventional OWTS require the use of a septic tank to allow for the removal of solids in the wastewater prior to being discharged to the dispersal field. Alternative OWTS also require a septic tank unless a settling chamber is a component of the treatment unit. B. Septic Tank Requirements: 1. Septic tanks must be certified by the International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials (IAPMO). 2. The tank shall be watertight and possess two chambers. 3. Septic tanks shall be certified by the manufacturer to allow for burial without being water filled to allow for routine maintenance or to be used as a holding tank as needed. 4. Septic tanks shall be installed per the manufacturer's instructions. 5. The bottom of the excavation for the tank shall extend into native or compacted soils to eliminate potential settling issues. 6. Septic tank location must take into account maintenance and pumping requirements including vehicle access; and distance and elevation lift to pumper truck. 7. All tanks must have a capped tee or a 90 degree elbow fitting on the inlet to prevent gas exchange between the tank and the house plumbing. Inlet tees must extend at least 14 inches below the liquid level. 27 Page 394 8. Outlet tees must be uncapped and must extend at least 12 inches below the liquid level. 9. The outlet elevation shall be between 2 and 6 inches lower than the inlet elevation to ensure proper fall without a significant loss of volume. 10. Fall between the outlet of the septic tank and the dispersal field shall be continuous with a minimum fall that that ensures the outlet pipe is 4 inches higher than the top of the seepage pit system or 4 inches above the top of the leach rock or other components used in the dispersal system on a level system, or a distribution box if multiple seepage pits or leach lines are constructed. 11. Septic tanks with greater than 6 inches of cover must have risers to within 6 inches of finished grade. Risers and lids that are at or above grade must be watertight and lockable or require tools to be opened. 12. Septic tank risers must have a current IAPMO certification prior to use. Concrete risers and lids must be constructed of Type V concrete or be protected from corrosion from sewer gases. The interior diameter of the riser shall be a minimum of eighteen (18) inches. 13. Effluent filters must be IAPMO approved if they are to be installed as part of the outlet tee. 14. Septic tanks installed in areas of vehicular traffic must be certified to withstand the proposed loads or have an engineered traffic slab installed to accommodate the proposed loads. 15. Minimum tank size is 1000 gallons for residential and 750 gallons for non-residential structures. 16. Septic tanks shall be sized according to anticipated wastewater flows from the structure(s). The following standard sizes shall apply: (i) 1-3 bedroom single family dwelling (0-450 GPD) 1000 gallons; (ii) 4 bedroom single family dwelling (450-600 GPD) 1200 gallons; (iii) 5-6 bedroom single family dwelling (601-900 GPD) 1500 gallons; and (iv) Flows greater than 900 GPD must utilize the following formula to determine minimum tank sizing: 1125 gallons + (.75)(Flow in GPD). Page 395 17. The permitted plan set shall contain a note requiring the septic tank to be filled with water, without leakage, at the time of the first inspection. 19.28.180 Leach Line System Requirements. A. Leach line systems are limited to soils with percolation rates of 120 minutes per inch or less. Percolation rates in excess of 120 minutes per inch are unsuitable for the installation of an OWTS dispersal system. 1. At least four percolation test holes at each leach field location should be provided to represent soil types at the depth of the proposed leach lines. At least one deep boring should extend to a depth of at least 15 feet or to impermeable material but in no case shall there be less than 5 foot of unsaturated, permeable soil below the bottom of the leach line trench. For areas of suspected high groundwater, deep borings are recommended to be 20'-25' to help determine gradients during varying rainfall periods. 2. Backhoe excavations may be required to demonstrate uniformity of soil throughout the leach field area(s). Leach line dispersal systems are limited to slopes of 25 percent (4:1) or less. B. Soil Cover Requirements. The maximum soil cover allowed over the top of the infiltrative surface is 48 inches, measured from the top of the leach rock chamber/etc. to the ground surface. The minimum cover required over the top of the infiltrative surface is 12 inches. Soil cover requirements must also conform to those allowed by the manufacturer of any gravel-less/chamber design. C. Leach Line Dimensions. Leach lines are to be installed according to the qualified professional's specifications for location, length, width, and depth. Leach lines are to be spaced at least 10 feet apart, measured center to center. Leach lines shall be installed with a width of no less than 12 inches and no more than 36 inches. Regardless of trench width or materials used, dispersal systems using leach lines shall be designed using not less than 3 square feet of infiltrative area per linear foot of trench as the infiltrative surface. No reduction in sizing is allowed for the use of chambers. The minimum length of leach trench for a new OWTS using leach lines as the dispersal system shall be 200 feet regardless of the projected wastewater flows. A 100% reserve area shall be required for all leach line systems. Properties that previously were required to maintain areas 29 Page 396 of 200% or 300% reserve shall now have a 100% reserve area requirement in place of the previous requirement. D. Materials and Construction Considerations. Leach lines shall not be placed under impermeable surfaces. Leach lines that are later covered by impermeable surfaces may not be considered as viable for purposes of determining primary and reserve area requirements. All piping and materials used in leach line systems including gravel- less/chamber systems must have IAPMO approval and must be approved by City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Services prior to installation. Leach lines that utilize gravel shall be filled with clean, washed leach line rock to a point at least 4 inches above the top of a 4 -inch perforated pipe and shall have a minimum of 12 inches of gravel below the pipe. The rock shall be graded at 1 to 1.5 inches in size and shall be covered with straw, untreated building paper or a geotextile fabric prior to backfill to prevent the infiltration of soil into the rock. Where multiple leach lines are proposed on sloping ground, a distribution box must be used to connect the leach lines. Leach line trenches shall be installed with the trench bottom and materials used being level to within 2 inches per 100 feet. E. Leach Lines on Steep Slopes. The following requirements must be met for the installation of leach line trenches on slopes exceeding 25 percent (4:1) without necessitating the grading of terraces. 1. The maximum slope allowed for leach line trenches is 40 percent (2-1/21 slope). 2. All leach lines on steep slopes shall be installed in 5 foot deep trenches with 12 inches of leach rock below the leach pipe or with approved chambers or other gravel -less system. 3. The design of disposal systems on steep slopes requires the experience and expertise to address conditions relative to soil, slope stability, and subsurface conditions which require professional judgment and technical knowledge. Designs for steep slope systems will only be approved when submitted by a qualified professional licensed in the State of California. 4. Testing must provide data representative of the entire disposal area and demonstrate that conditions are uniform below the entire disposal area. The minimum testing required is: (i) Six percolation tests at a depth equal to the proposed trench depth; (ii) Two percolation tests five feet below the proposed trench depth; (iii) Percolation testing must show rates of 120 minutes per inch or less; and (iv) At least two soil 30 Page 397 profile borings demonstrating uniform conditions throughout the disposal area to a depth of 10 feet below the proposed trench depth. 5. Design reports must include the following: (i) Cross section(s) hillside soil profile(s); (ii) Detailed boring logs of all test holes and borings; (iii) Scaled layouts and profiled designs based on accurate topography; (iv) Any grading proposed on the site in the disposal area; (v) A slope stability report or statement from a qualified professional; (vi) Any grading, proposed to create a stable work area for trench installation, may be subject to review for conflict with Building and Safety Services Department. F. Leach Line System Length. Table 19.28.180. Leach Line System Length Requirements. LEACH LINE TRENCH LENGTH (feet) BASED ON PERCOLATION TEST RATE Perc Rate Number of Bedrooms Rate Perc Number of Bedrooms MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 200 200 240 270 280 300 31 280 350 420 480 535 595 2 200 200 240 270 280 300 32 280 355 430 480 535 595 3 200 200 240 270 280 300 33 290 360 430 490 545 605 4 200 220 260 290 300 310 34 290 360 440 490 545 605 5 200 240 290 320 320 340 35 290 365 440 500 555 615 6 200 250 300 340 350 360 36 300 370 440 500 555 615 7 210 260 310 350 370 380 37 300 370 450 500 555 615 8 210 265 320 360 390 400 38 300 375 450 510 565 625 9 220 270 320 360 400 410 39 300 380 460 510 565 625 10 220 275 330 370 410 420 40 300 380 460 520 575 635 11 220 280 340 380 420 430 41 310 385 460 520 575 635 12 230 285 340 380 430 440 42 310 390 470 530 585 645 31 Page 398 LEACH LINE TRENCH LENGTH (feet) BASED ON PERCOLATION TEST RATE Perc Rate Number of Bedrooms Rate Perc Number of Bedrooms MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 13 230 290 350 390 430 450 43 310 390 470 530 585 645 14 235 295 350 400 440 460 44 310 395 480 540 595 655 15 240 300 360 400 450 470 45 320 400 480 540 595 655 16 240 300 360 410 450 490 46 320 400 480 540 595 655 17 240 305 370 410 460 500 47 320 405 490 550 605 665 18 250 310 370 420 460 510 48 330 410 490 550 605 665 19 250 310 380 420 470 520 49 330 410 500 560 615 675 20 250 315 380 430 470 520 50 330 415 500 560 615 675 21 260 320 380 430 480 530 51 340 420 500 560 615 675 22 260 320 390 440 480 530 52 340 420 510 570 625 685 23 260 325 390 440 490 550 53 340 425 510 580 635 695 24 260 330 400 450 500 560 54 340 430 520 580 635 695 25 260 330 400 450 500 560 55 340 430 520 580 635 695 26 270 335 400 450 510 570 56 350 435 520 590 645 705 27 270 340 410 460 515 575 57 350 440 530 590 645 705 28 270 340 410 460 515 575 58 350 440 530 600 655 715 29 270 345 420 470 525 585 59 350 445 540 600 655 715 30 280 350 420 470 525 585 60 360 450 540 610 665 725 32 Page 399 LEACH LINE TRENCH LENGTH BASED ON PERCOLATION TEST RATE Perc Rate Number of Bedrooms Rate Perc Number of Bedrooms MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 61 370 460 550 620 690 740 91 680 770 860 930 980 1020 62 380 470 560 630 680 720 92 695 785 875 945 995 1035 63 390 480 570 640 690 730 93 710 800 890 960 1010 1050 64 400 490 580 650 700 740 94 725 815 905 975 1025 1065 65 420 500 580 660 710 750 95 740 830 920 990 1040 1080 66 420 510 600 670 720 760 96 755 845 935 1005 1055 1095 67 430 520 610 680 730 770 97 770 860 950 1020 1070 1110 68 440 530 620 690 740 780 98 785 875 965 1035 1085 1125 69 450 540 630 700 750 790 99 800 890 980 1050 1100 1140 70 460 550 640 710 760 800 100 815 905 995 1065 1115 1155 71 470 560 650 720 770 810 101 830 920 1010 1080 1130 1170 72 480 570 660 730 780 820 102 845 935 1025 1095 1145 1185 73 490 580 670 740 790 830 103 860 950 1040 1110 1160 1200 74 500 590 680 750 800 840 104 875 965 1055 1125 1175 1215 75 510 600 690 760 810 850 105 890 980 1070 1140 1190 1230 76 520 610 700 770 820 860 106 905 995 1085 1155 1205 1245 77 530 620 710 780 830 870 107 920 1010 1100 1170 1220 1260 78 540 630 720 790 840 880 108 935 1025 1115 1185 1230 1270 79 550 640 730 800 850 890 109 950 1040 1130 1200 1250 1290 80 560 650 740 810 860 900 110 965 1055 1145 1215 1265 1305 81 570 660 750 820 870 910 111 980 1070 1160 1230 1280 1320 82 580 670 760 830 880 920 112 995 1085 1175 1245 1295 1335 83 590 680 770 840 890 930 113 1010 1100 1190 1260 1310 1350 33 Page 400 LEACH LINE TRENCH LENGTH BASED ON PERCOLATION TEST RATE Perc Rate Number of Bedrooms Rate Perc Number of Bedrooms MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 84 600 690 780 850 900 940 114 1025 1115 1205 1275 1325 1365 85 610 700 790 860 910 950 115 1040 1130 1220 1290 1340 1380 86 620 710 800 870 920 960 116 1055 1145 1235 1305 1355 1395 87 630 720 810 880 930 970 117 1070 1160 1250 1320 1370 1410 88 640 730 820 890 940 980 118 1085 1175 1265 1335 1385 1425 89 650 740 830 900 950 990 119 1100 1190 1280 1350 1390 1440 90 665 755 845 915 965 1005 120 1120 1210 1300 1370 1420 1460 Note: MPI means minutes per inch. Conversion Factor example. (1 inch of drop/ # Perc Rate) x 60 minutes per hour = 6 inches/hour. 19.28.190 Vertical Seepage Pit System Requirements. A. Permitted Locations. 1. Any lot previously approved for the use of a vertical seepage pit must meet all current requirements found in this section to be considered for development based on the use of a vertical seepage pit. A new custom single family house may use the sizing criteria for existing lots. 2. New lots containing two or more OWTS units, upon the recommendation and design by a qualified professional soils engineer. B. Percolation Test Procedures for Vertical Seepage Pit Systems. All vertical seepage pits for new construction, or for 2 or more lots, will require percolation testing by a qualified professional certified to perform percolation tests in City of Rancho Cucamonga. A waiver of testing can be considered where adequate information exists as to soil types, depth and permeability. Percolation testing for vertical seepage pits shall be completed per the following guidelines: 1. A 12 to 48 inch diameter test hole shall be excavated to a depth of at least 10 feet deeper than the proposed installation depth. 34 Page 401 2. A minimum 10 foot separation between the bottom of the vertical seepage pit and the anticipated high groundwater level is required. 3. Boring logs shall be recorded and included with all test reports indicating soil strata depths and types and visual classification according to the unified soil classification system along with any groundwater encountered. 4. The overdrill must be checked for the presence of groundwater a minimum of 24 hours after the completion of the test boring to allow time for groundwater to stabilize in the hole. 5. After the groundwater reading is recorded, the test hole shall be backfilled to a depth 10 feet above the bottom of the test hole or the groundwater level whichever is shallower. 6. The pit shall be filled with water to the cap depth and a continuous pre-soak shall be maintained at the proposed cap level for a minimum 8 -hour period. In highly permeable soils when cap levels cannot be maintained during pre-soak, the test shall be conducted at a depth no higher than the pre-soak level which was attained. Document the pre-soak attempt with gallons of water used. In no case shall less than 5,000 gallons of water be used within a 1 hour period in the attempted pre- soak when the cap level cannot be maintained. The depth of the test shall be noted on the boring log and in no case shall the sidewall of permeable soil below the cap level be less than ten foot. 7. Upon completion of the pre-soak period, fill the pit to cap level and determine uniformity of soil by measuring the falling head. Distance to the water level shall be measured at 15 minute intervals, or more frequently if needed, until the drop stops or the pit empties. A graph of the drop in water level shall be attached to all proposals submitted by the qualified professional. If non-uniform rates persist, the soil will not be considered uniform and the tests discontinued as they will not be approved by City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Services. 8. If the procedure in Item no. 4 demonstrates uniform soil, proceed with a two-hour static head or falling head capacity test: (i) Static Head — the pit shall be filled with water to the cap depth and the water column shall be maintained at that level for two hours. The amount of water added to maintain 35 Page 402 this level must be documented. The 24-hour capacity is determined by multiplying by 12. Adjustment to a four foot diameter pit is made if a lesser size test hole is used; (ii) Falling Head — the pit shall be filled with water to the cap depth and the column of water shall be allowed to drop for a two hour period. The distance dropped shall be measured and the amount of water absorbed determined. This amount is multiplied by 12 to determine the 24-hour capacity. Adjustment to a four foot diameter pit is made if a lesser size test hole is used. 9. The minimum capacity for a new OWTS using vertical seepage pits as the dispersal system shall be 5 times the volume of the required septic tank or 5000 gallons per day whichever is greater. All individual vertical seepage pit shall have a minimum capacity of 1,667 gallons per day. 10. Each pit must meet these minimum criteria to be acceptable. The qualified professional may include safety factors as he feels the situation warrants. 11. It shall be the responsibility of the qualified professional to maintain all test holes or pits in a safe manner prior to backfill or capping to prevent a hazard or accident. C. Dimensions and Construction Requirements. 1. Vertical seepage pits shall be installed according to the qualified profession's specifications for location, depth, and cap depth. 2. The pit excavation shall be five (5), six (6) or seven (7) feet in diameter. Pit excavations greater than 7 -feet in diameter require prior approval by the Building Official. 3. The sidewall depth below the inlet shall not be less than 14 feet. 4. The minimum depth to the top of the infiltrative surface allowed is 2 feet. This depth is also known as the cap depth. There is no maximum cap depth but documentation must be provided to justify any cap depth greater than 5 feet. 5. The maximum slope allowed for the use of vertical seepage pits is 40 percent (2-1/2:1 slope). Slopes that exceed 25% (4:1) will require additional engineering and design detail as required to address the risk of effluent surfacing on the slope recognizable as sewage as well as slope stability issues. 36 Page 403 Slopes that exceed 25% (4:1) will, in most cases, require a terrace design or grading to allow for drilling access. Any grading shall be in accordance with any permit requirements for brushing, clearing, and grading from any other agency. 6. All pits must be filled with clean washed leach line rock to the cap depth. The rock shall be graded at 1 to 1.5 inches in size and shall be covered with straw, untreated building paper or a geotextile fabric prior to backfill to prevent the infiltration of soil into the rock. 7. A 4 inch Schedule 40 pipe shall be installed from the ground surface to the bottom of each seepage pit for clean-out, pumping and verification of the total pit depth. The pipe shall have perforations from the cap depth to the bottom of the pit and be of solid construction from the cap depth to the ground surface. A screw fit cap must be placed on top of the riser to allow access. 8. Where more than one vertical seepage pit is proposed for the primary or reserve system, a distribution box must be used to connect the pits. Chaining or lining the seepage pits together such that the overflow from an upstream pit flows to a downstream pit shall not be permitted. D. Design Criteria for Replacement of Existing Private Sewage Disposal Systems. Table 19.28.190.D Design Criteria for Replacement of Existing Private Sewage Disposal Systems. 37 Page 404 Minimum 3 Ft A.P.* @ 5 Ft A.P.* @ 7 Ft A.P.* @ Size of Seepage Pit Septic p Disposal 12" 24" 36" with Tank Leach Wide Bottom Wide Bottom Wide Bottom Min. 4Ft. —Max. 6Ft. Capacity Field Below Below Below Dia. Liner. (Gallons) (Area Leach Line Leach Line Leach Line (Diameter x Depth) Req'd) (A.P. x (A.P. x (A.P. x (See notes: 3, 4, 5 & 6) Required Length) Length) Length) Field Design at 60 Square Feet / 100 gallons (See Pit design at 60 Square notes: 1, 2, 3 & 6) Feet/ 100 gallons 1,000 600 (2) 3'x 100' (4) 5'x 55' (2) 7' x 100' or 5'x 39' 6' x 32'7' x 28' (1)7'x200' 1,200 720 (3)3'x80' (4)5'x66' (4)7'x52' 5'x46' 6'x38'7'x33' 37 Page 404 1,500 900 (3) Tx 100' (3) 5'x 82' (3) 7' x 70' 5'x58' 6' x 48' 7' x 41' 1 Field Design at 90 Square Feet / 100 gallons (See notes: 1, 2, 3 & 6) Pit design at 90 Square Feet/ 100 gallons 1,000 900 (3)3'x100' (2)5'x100' (3)7'x64' 5'x58' 6' x 48' 7' x 41' 1,200 1,080 (4) Tx 90' (3) 5'x 72' (3)7'x78' 5'x69' 6' x 58' 7' x 50' 1,500 1,350 (5)Tx90' (3)5'x90' (2)7'x100' 5'x86' 6'x72'7'x62' 31 Notes: *Absorption Perimeter 1. Other variations may be allowed to width and depth so as to achieve the required leach area. Chapter 8. 2. Trenches shall not have less than 600 sq. ft of infiltrative area. Chapter 8. 3. All deviations from this handout will require a percolation test with a designed septic system by a licensed Civil Engineer. 4. Depth of the seepage pit shall be measured from the bottom of the pit to the invert of the distribution pipe. Chapter 9. 5. Multiple seepage pits may be used. If this is the case, the required depth from the table above can be divided equally among the numbers of seepage pits. In no cases the depth of seepage pits can be less than the "minimum depth". Chapter 9. E. Design Criteria for New Private Sewage Disposal Systems. 1. Five -Foot Diameter Pits: SEEPAGE PIT DEPTH (feet) BASED ON PERCOLATION TEST RATE Perc Rate Number of Bedrooms Rate Perc Number of Bedrooms MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 17 17 17 17 18 19 31 18 22 27 31 34 38 2 17 17 17 17 18 19 32 18 23 27 31 34 38 3 17 17 17 17 18 19 33 18 23 27 31 35 39 4 17 17 17 18 19 20 34 18 23 28 31 35 39 5 17 17 18 20 20 22 35 18 23 28 32 35 39 Page 405 SEEPAGE PIT DEPTH (feet) BASED ON PERCOLATION TEST RATE Perc Rate Number of Bedrooms Rate Perc Rate Perc Number of Bedrooms MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 MPI MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 6 17 17 19 22 22 23 91 36 19 24 28 32 35 39 7 17 17 20 22 24 24 92 37 19 24 29 32 35 39 8 17 17 20 23 25 25 93 38 19 24 29 32 36 40 9 17 17 20 23 25 26 94 39 19 24 29 32 36 40 10 17 18 21 24 26 27 95 40 19 24 29 33 37 40 11 17 18 22 24 27 27 96 41 20 25 29 33 37 40 12 17 18 22 24 27 28 97 42 20 25 30 34 37 41 13 17 18 22 25 27 29 43 20 25 30 34 37 41 14 17 19 22 25 28 29 44 20 25 31 34 38 42 15 17 19 23 25 29 30 45 20 25 31 34 38 42 16 17 19 23 26 29 31 46 20 25 31 34 38 42 17 17 19 24 26 29 32 47 20 26 31 35 39 42 18 17 20 24 27 29 32 48 21 26 31 35 39 42 19 17 20 24 27 30 33 49 21 26 32 36 39 43 20 17 20 24 27 30 33 50 21 26 32 36 39 43 21 17 20 24 27 31 34 51 22 27 32 36 39 43 22 17 20 25 28 31 34 52 22 27 32 36 40 44 23 17 21 25 28 31 35 53 22 27 32 37 40 44 24 17 21 25 29 32 36 54 22 27 33 37 40 44 25 17 21 25 29 32 36 55 22 27 33 37 40 44 26 17 21 25 29 32 36 56 22 28 33 38 41 45 27 17 22 26 29 33 37 57 22 28 34 38 41 45 28 17 22 26 29 33 37 58 22 28 34 38 1 42 46 29 17 22 27 30 33 37 59 22 28 34 38 42 46 30 18 22 27 30 33 37 60 23 29 34 39 42 46 SEEPAGE PIT DEPTH (feet) BASED ON PERCOLATION TEST RATE Perc Rate Number of Bedrooms Rate Perc Number of Bedrooms MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 61 24 29 35 39 44 47 91 43 49 55 59 62 65 62 24 30 36 40 43 46 92 44 50 56 60 63 66 63 25 31 36 41 44 46 93 45 51 57 61 64 67 64 25 31 37 41 45 47 94 1 46 52 1 58 62 1 65 68 65 27 32 37 42 45 48 95 47 53 59 63 66 69 66 27 32 38 43 46 48 96 48 54 60 64 67 70 67 27 33 39 43 46 49 97 49 55 61 65 68 71 39 Page 406 SEEPAGE PIT DEPTH (feet) BASED ON PERCOLATION TEST RATE Perc Rate Number of Bedrooms Rate Perc Rate Perc Number of Bedrooms MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 68 28 34 39 44 47 50 19 98 50 56 61 66 69 72 69 29 34 40 45 48 50 23 99 51 57 62 67 70 73 70 29 35 41 45 48 51 100 52 58 63 68 71 74 71 30 36 41 46 49 52 101 53 59 64 69 72 75 72 31 36 42 46 50 52 102 54 60 65 70 73 75 73 31 37 43 47 50 53 103 55 61 66 71 74 76 74 32 38 43 48 51 54 104 56 61 67 72 75 77 75 32 38 44 48 52 54 105 57 62 68 73 76 78 76 33 39 45 49 52 55 106 58 63 69 74 77 79 77 34 39 45 50 53 55 107 59 64 70 75 78 80 78 34 40 46 50 54 56 108 60 65 71 75 78 81 79 35 41 46 51 54 57 109 61 66 72 76 80 82 80 36 41 47 52 55 57 110 61 67 73 77 81 83 81 36 42 48 52 55 58 111 62 68 74 78 82 84 82 37 43 48 53 56 59 112 63 69 75 79 82 85 83 38 43 49 54 57 59 113 64 70 76 80 83 86 84 38 44 50 54 57 60 114 65 71 77 81 84 87 85 39 45 50 55 58 61 115 66 72 78 82 85 88 86 39 45 51 55 59 61 116 67 73 79 83 86 89 87 40 46 52 56 59 62 117 68 74 80 84 87 90 88 41 46 52 57 60 62 118 69 75 81 85 88 91 89 41 47 53 57 61 63 119 70 76 82 86 89 92 90 42 48 54 58 61 64 120 71 77 r83 87 90 93 Where: mpi = minutes per inch Conversion Factor: Example: (1 inch of drop / X MPI) x 60 minutes per hour = 6 inches/hour 2. Six -Foot Diameter Pits: SEEPAGE PIT DEPTH (feet) BASED ON PERCOLATION TEST RATE Perc Rate Number of Bedrooms Rate Perc Number of Bedrooms MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 17 17 17 17 17 17 31 17 19 22 25 28 32 2 17 17 17 17 17 17 32 17 19 23 25 28 32 Page 407 SEEPAGE PIT DEPTH (feet) BASED ON PERCOLATION TEST RATE Perc Rate Number of Bedrooms Rate Perc Rate Perc Number of Bedrooms MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 MPI MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 3 17 17 17 17 17 17 91 33 17 19 23 26 29 32 4 17 17 17 17 17 17 92 34 17 19 23 26 29 32 5 17 17 17 17 17 18 93 35 17 19 23 27 29 33 6 17 17 17 18 19 19 94 36 17 20 23 27 29 33 7 17 17 17 19 20 20 37 17 20 24 27 29 33 8 17 17 17 19 21 21 38 17 20 24 27 30 33 9 17 17 17 19 21 22 39 17 20 24 27 30 33 10 17 17 18 20 22 22 40 17 20 24 28 31 34 11 17 17 18 20 22 23 41 17 20 24 28 31 34 12 17 17 18 20 23 23 42 17 21 25 28 31 34 13 17 17 19 21 23 24 43 17 21 25 28 31 34 14 17 17 19 21 23 24 44 17 21 25 29 32 35 15 17 17 19 21 24 25 45 17 21 25 29 32 35 16 17 17 19 22 24 26 46 17 21 25 29 32 35 17 17 17 20 22 24 27 47 17 21 26 29 32 35 18 17 17 20 22 24 27 48 18 22 26 29 32 35 19 17 17 20 22 25 28 49 18 22 27 30 33 36 20 17 17 20 23 25 28 50 18 22 27 30 33 36 21 17 17 20 23 25 28 51 18 22 27 30 33 36 22 17 17 21 23 25 28 52 18 22 27 30 33 36 23 17 17 21 23 26 29 53 18 23 27 31 34 37 24 17 18 21 24 27 30 54 18 23 28 31 34 37 25 17 18 21 24 27 30 55 18 23 28 31 34 37 26 17 18 21 24 27 30 56 19 23 28 31 34 37 27 17 18 22 24 27 31 57 19 23 28 31 34 37 28 17 18 22 24 27 31 58 19 23 28 32 35 38 29 17 18 22 25 28 31 59 19 24 29 32 35 38 30 17 19 22 25 28 31 60 19 24 29 32 35 38 SEEPAGE PIT DEPTH (feet) BASED ON PERCOLATION TEST RATE Perc Rate Number of Bedrooms Rate Perc Number of Bedrooms MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 61 20 24 29 33 37 39 91 36 41 46 49 52 54 62 20 25 30 33 36 38 92 37 42 46 50 53 55 63 21 25 30 34 37 39 93 38 42 47 51 54 56 64 21 26 31 35 37 39 94 1 38 1 43 1 48 1 52 1 54 1 57 41 Page 408 SEEPAGE PIT DEPTH (feet) BASED ON PERCOLATION TEST RATE Perc Rate Number of Bedrooms Rate Perc Number of Bedrooms MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 MPI 1 MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 65 22 27 31 35 38 40 17 95 39 44 49 53 55 57 66 22 27 32 36 38 40 20 96 40 45 50 53 56 58 67 23 28 32 36 39 41 22 97 41 46 50 54 57 59 68 23 28 33 37 39 41 1 25 98 42 46 51 55 58 60 69 24 29 33 37 40 42 99 42 47 52 56 58 61 70 24 29 34 38 40 42 100 43 48 53 57 59 61 71 25 30 35 38 41 43 101 44 49 54 57 60 62 72 25 30 35 39 41 44 102 45 50 54 58 61 63 73 26 31 36 39 42 44 103 46 50 55 59 62 64 74 27 31 36 40 42 45 104 46 51 56 60 62 64 75 27 32 37 40 43 45 105 47 52 57 61 63 65 76 28 32 37 41 44 46 106 48 53 58 61 64 66 77 28 33 38 41 44 46 107 49 54 58 62 65 67 78 29 33 38 42 45 47 108 50 54 59 63 65 67 79 29 34 39 42 45 47 109 50 55 60 64 66 68 80 30 35 39 43 46 48 110 51 56 61 64 67 69 81 30 35 40 44 46 48 111 52 57 62 65 68 70 82 31 36 40 44 47 49 112 53 58 62 66 69 71 83 31 36 41 45 47 49 113 54 58 63 67 70 72 84 32 37 41 45 48 50 114 54 59 64 68 70 72 85 32 37 42 46 48 50 115 55 60 65 68 71 73 86 33 38 42 46 49 51 116 56 61 66 69 72 74 87 33 38 43 47 49 51 117 57 62 66 70 73 75 88 34 39 44 47 50 52 118 58 62 67 71 74 76 89 35 39 44 48 50 53 119 58 63 68 72 74 76 90 35 40 45 49 51 53 120 59 64 69 73 75 77 Seven -Foot Diameter Pits: SEEPAGE PIT DEPTH (feet) BASED ON PERCOLATION TEST RATE Perc Rate Number of Bedrooms Rate Perc Number of Bedrooms MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 17 17 17 17 17 17 31 17 17 19 22 24 27 2 17 17 17 17 17 17 32 17 17 20 22 24 27 3 17 17 17 17 17 17 33 17 17 20 22 25 28 4 17 1 17 1 17 1 17 1 17 1 17 34 1 17 1 17 1 20 1 22 1 25 1 28 W Page 409 SEEPAGE PIT DEPTH (feet) BASED ON PERCOLATION TEST RATE Perc Rate Number of Bedrooms Rate Perc Number of Bedrooms MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 5 17 17 17 17 17 17 35 17 17 20 23 25 28 6 17 17 17 17 17 17 36 17 17 20 23 25 28 7 17 17 17 17 17 17 37 17 17 20 23 25 28 8 17 17 17 17 18 18 1 38 17 17 20 23 26 28 9 17 17 17 17 18 19 39 17 17 21 23 26 28 10 17 17 17 17 19 19 40 17 17 21 24 26 29 11 17 17 17 17 19 20 41 17 18 21 24 26 29 12 17 17 17 17 20 20 42 17 18 21 24 27 29 13 17 17 17 18 20 20 43 17 18 21 24 27 29 14 17 17 17 18 20 21 44 17 18 22 25 27 30 15 17 17 17 18 20 21 45 17 18 22 25 27 30 16 17 17 17 19 20 22 46 17 18 22 25 27 30 17 17 17 17 19 21 23 47 17 18 22 25 28 30 18 17 17 17 19 21 23 48 17 19 22 25 28 30 19 17 17 17 19 21 24 49 17 19 23 25 28 31 20 17 17 17 20 21 24 50 17 19 23 25 28 31 21 17 17 17 20 22 24 51 17 19 23 25 28 31 22 17 17 18 20 22 24 52 17 19 23 26 28 31 23 17 17 18 20 22 25 53 17 19 23 26 29 32 24 17 17 18 20 23 25 54 17 20 24 26 29 32 25 17 17 18 20 23 25 55 17 20 24 26 29 32 26 17 17 18 20 23 26 56 17 20 24 27 29 32 27 17 17 19 21 23 26 57 17 20 24 27 29 32 28 17 17 19 21 23 26 58 17 20 24 27 30 33 29 17 17 19 21 24 27 59 17 20 25 27 30 33 30 17 17 19 21 24 27 60 17 20 25 28 30 33 SEEPAGE PIT DEPTH (feet) BASED ON PERCOLATION TEST RATE Perc Rate Number of Bedrooms Rate Perc Number of Bedrooms MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 61 17 21 25 28 31 34 91 31 35 39 42 45 46 62 17 21 25 29 31 33 92 32 36 40 43 45 47 63 18 22 26 29 31 33 93 32 36 40 44 46 48 64 1 18 1 22 1 26 1 30 1 32 1 34 1 1 94 1 33 1 37 1 41 1 44 1 47 1 48 65 19 23 26 30 32 34 95 34 38 42 45 47 49 66 19 23 27 30 33 35 96 34 38 43 46 48 50 43 Page 410 SEEPAGE PIT DEPTH (feet) BASED ON PERCOLATION TEST RATE Perc Rate Number of Bedrooms Rate Perc Number of Bedrooms MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 MPI 1 2 3 4 5 6 67 20 24 28 31 33 35 97 35 39 43 46 49 51 68 20 24 28 31 34 35 98 36 40 44 47 49 51 69 20 25 29 32 34 36 99 36 40 45 48 50 52 70 21 25 29 32 35 36 100 37 41 45 48 51 53 71 21 25 30 33 35 37 101 38 42 46 49 51 53 72 22 26 30 33 35 37 102 38 43 47 50 52 54 73 22 26 30 34 36 38 103 39 43 47 51 53 55 74 23 27 31 34 36 38 104 40 44 48 51 53 55 75 23 27 31 35 37 39 105 40 45 49 52 54 56 76 24 28 32 35 37 39 106 41 45 49 53 55 57 77 24 28 32 35 38 40 107 42 46 50 53 56 57 78 25 29 33 36 38 40 108 43 47 51 54 56 58 79 25 29 33 36 39 40 109 43 47 51 55 57 59 80 25 30 34 37 39 41 110 44 48 52 55 58 59 81 26 30 34 37 40 41 111 45 49 53 56 58 60 82 26 30 35 38 40 42 112 45 49 53 57 59 61 83 27 31 35 38 40 42 113 46 50 54 57 60 61 84 27 31 35 39 41 43 114 47 51 55 58 60 62 85 28 32 36 39 41 43 115 47 51 56 59 61 63 86 28 32 36 40 42 44 116 48 52 56 59 62 63 87 29 33 37 40 42 44 117 49 53 57 60 62 64 88 29 33 37 40 43 45 118 49 53 58 61 63 65 89 30 34 38 41 43 45 119 50 54 58 61 63 66 90 30 34 38 42 44 46 120 51 55 1 59 1 62 65 66 19.28.200 Horizontal Seepage Pit Systems. The use of the horizontal seepage pit systems is permitted only where adequate area does not exist for a leach line system. All horizontal seepage pit systems shall comply with the design and construction requirements provided in this section. A. Percolation Test Procedures for Horizontal Seepage Pit Systems. All percolation tests shall be performed in accordance with the test procedures found in 19.28.160 (Groundwater and Percolation Testing Requirements). In addition to the requirements of Section 19.28.160, percolation tests for horizontal seepage pits must also comply with the following additional requirements: Page 411 1. The average percolation rates shall not exceed 30 minutes per inch in any portion of the horizontal seepage pit. Individual rates exceeding 30 minutes per inch may be considered with additional soil testing. 2. At least 4 percolation test holes at each pit location should be provided to represent soil types within the infiltrative surface area of the seepage pit. This profile should represent the entire sidewall depth of the pit. 3. At least 1 deep boring should extend to a depth of at least 10 feet below the bottom of the seepage pit, or to impermeable material. In no case shall less than 5 feet of unsaturated permeable soil exist below the bottom of the seepage pit. 4. Backhoe excavations may be required to demonstrate uniformity of soil throughout the seepage pit. This would be necessary when the pit is proposed in an area of variable soil conditions. 5. Any percolation tests for horizontal seepage pits, which were approved based on testing prior to the effective date of this section, will require additional percolation testing unless the previous testing meets current requirements. B. Dimensions and Construction Requirements. 1. Horizontal seepage pits are to be installed according to the qualified professional's specifications for location, length, width, and depth. 2. Horizontal seepage pits must be spaced 20 feet apart measured edge to edge. 3. Primary and reserve horizontal seepage pits cannot be combined in one common pit. 4. The pit excavation must be at least 4 feet in width, but not greater than 6 feet in width. 5. The top of the infiltrative surface shall be at least 2 feet below the natural grade but no more than 5 feet. This depth is also known as the cap depth. Additional soil can be placed over the top of the installed horizontal seepage pit at the discretion of the qualified professional. 6. The sidewall depth below the cap shall be at least 6 feet but cannot exceed 7 feet. 45 Page 412 7. The pit excavations may arc or bend under the following conditions: (i) The maximum deflection cannot exceed a total of 45 degrees in any direction without increasing the pit length to compensate for loss of sidewall area; (ii) Bends or arcs totaling greater than 45 degrees may be accepted on a case- by-case basis. A correction factor will be required, increasing the total length, due to sidewall loss; and (iii) U-shaped and H-shaped bends will not be accepted. 8. The maximum slope for the use of horizontal seepage pits is 25% (4:1). Exceptions to this slope limit may be considered up to 50% (2:1), on a case-by-case basis, where the soil and slope are uniform, extending 100 feet beyond the seepage pit. Additional testing, and design detail shall be required to address the risk of effluent surfacing on the slope recognizable as sewage as well as slope stability issues. Slopes that exceed 25% (4:1) will, in most cases, require a terrace design. Any grading to create terraces should be in accordance with any permit requirements for brushing, clearing, and grading from any other agency. 9. The use of concrete pit liners is allowed. If used, the concrete pit liners shall meet the testing standards established by the International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials (IAPMO). 10. All pits must be filled with clean leach line rock to the cap depth of the horizontal pit liner. The rock should be graded at 1 to 1.5 inches in size and shall be covered with straw, untreated building paper or a geotextile fabric prior to backfill to prevent the infiltration of soil into the rock. 11. A manifold system constructed of 4 inch loop of Schedule 40 perforated pipe shall be installed in the pit to allow for distribution of the effluent throughout the entire pit. The manifold shall be placed 1 foot from the sidewall of the horizontal seepage pit and shall run the length and width of the pit in a rectangular pattern. 12. Where more than one horizontal seepage pit is proposed for the primary or reserve system, a distribution box must be used to connect the pits. 13. A hybrid system combining a horizontal seepage pit for the primary or reserve design, and leach lines for the other system is allowed. However, a combination of the two types of systems, used for a single primary or reserve design, will not Page 413 be considered. The system design identified as the most difficult installation shall be installed as the primary system. This is to be based on access, grading, or other obstacles to install the system once the house is constructed. 14. The California Occupational Health and Safety Act (COHSA) requires shoring for excavations exceeding 5 feet when persons will be working in them. All work done installing horizontal seepage pits must comply with COHSA for the purpose of construction and inspection. C. Horizontal Seepage Pit Sizing Calculations. The calculations for sizing a horizontal seepage pit are done to provide an equivalent amount of sidewall area in the seepage pit as found in a standard 3 foot deep leach line trench using the same percolation rate. Seepage Pit Length = (3LL — 2wd)/ 2d Where: 3 = sq. ft. of absorptive sidewall area per lineal foot of 3 foot deep leach line trench LL = leach line length as a function of percolation rate w = seepage pit width d = seepage pit sidewall depth below cap 19.28.210 Alternative onsite wastewater treatment systems; Use of alternative systems. Alternative onsite wastewater treatment systems and sewage holding tanks may only be used with prior approval of the Director of Building and Safety Services prior to submittal of plans for permitting purposes. Owners of alternative treatment systems located within the City must: A. Maintain an operating permit; B. Ensure the alternative treatment system is inspected annually; and C. Submit quarterly water samples during the first year of use. 19.28.220 Alternate onsite wastewater treatment systems siting and operational requirements; Variances permissible. A. Property owners may apply to Building and Safety Services to establish alternative OWTS siting and operational requirements where it is determined by Building and Safety Services that 47 Page 414 alternative requirements will provide equivalent level of environmental protection. B. Variances will not be granted in the following circumstances: Where the proposed OWTS presents a substantial likelihood of discharging sewage, impure waters, or any matter or substance offensive, injurious, or dangerous to health so as to cause any of the following to occur: Sewage, impure waters, or any matter or substance offensive, injurious, or dangerous to health to empty, flow, seep, or drain onto the surface of any land. Sewage, impure waters, or any matter or substance offensive, injurious, or dangerous to health to empty, flow, seep, drain into, or affect any well, spring, stream, river, lake, or other waters. iii. Result in any condition which is unsafe, dangerous, or creates a nuisance. 2. Above surface discharge. Variances will not be granted for any OWTS which utilizes any form of effluent disposal discharging on, or above, the post installation ground surface; this includes, but is not limited to sprinklers, exposed drip lines, free -surface wetlands, and ponds. 3. Sewer availability. Variances will not be granted for any OWTS where there is a public sewer available. Building and Safety Services Department may require a "Will or Will Not Serve" letter Cucamonga Valley Water District with each new or replacement OWTS proposal to evaluate the proximity and availability of community systems to the proposed OWTS site. This will ensure septic systems are only installed in areas where a sewer is unavailable. The "Will or Will Not Serve" letter must include the following: (i) Parcel number for the property where the OWTS is being proposed; (ii) Distance to the nearest available sewer line; and (iii) Whether or not the sewering entity will provide service to the parcel. The "Will or Will Not Serve" letter must be completed and signed by the appropriate official representing the sewering entity and be filed with the Building and Safety Services Department prior to submittal of the percolation report/plot plan, or upon request once the percolation report/plot plan has been submitted. 4. Sewer Requirement. Connection to a public sewer system is required within established sewer service districts and outside Page 415 such districts when required by the RWQCB. Developments must connect to a sewer system when the nearest property line is within 200 feet of a sewer line. This requirement will be increased by 100 feet for each dwelling unit within the development. 5. Ground Slope. Variances will not be granted for slopes greater than a 30% incline without a slope stability report approved by a Qualified Professional. Refer to Natural Ground Slope for more information regarding natural ground slope requirements. 6. Leaching Areas. As referenced in the current adopted California Plumbing Code, Appendix H —Private Sewage Disposal Systems — Section H 301.1 Leaching Chambers that comply with IAPMO PS 63 and bundled expanded polystyrene synthetic aggregate units that comply with IAPMO IGC 276 shall be sized using the required area calculated using Table H 201.1(3) with a 0.70 multiplier. 7. Supplemental Treatment. OWTS utilizing supplemental treatment require periodic monitoring or inspections. No variances will be granted for supplemental treatments that are unable to meet this requirement. 8. Depth to Groundwater. No variance will be granted for OWTS with a depth from the bottom of the dispersal system to groundwater less than 5 feet. The exception to this will be for seepage pits which shall have a separation no less than 10 feet. 9. Recreational Vehicle (RV) Holding Tanks. No variances will be granted for OWTS dedicated to receiving significant amounts of wastes, which are dumped from RV holding tanks. 10. Class V Injection Wells. United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) requirements apply to underground injections control systems for OWTS. Subsurface disposal systems including leach fields and seepage pits shall comply with USEPA Underground Injection Control requirements when classified as a Class V injection well. Subsurface disposal systems with at least one of the following characteristics are classified as Class V wells: (i) The system has the capacity to serve 20 or more persons per day; (ii) The system receives wastewater other than domestic wastewater such as that generated by manufacturing, chemical processing, industrial fluid disposal, automotive Page 416 repair, or recycling; or (iii) The system receives sewage containing biological agents (such as wastewater from recreational vehicles or portable toilets). Disposal systems that are classified as Class V wells must be registered with USEPA. 19.28.230 Sewer wells; cesspools; seepage pits. Except those permitted pursuant to a valid OWTS permit issued in conformance with the requirements of this chapter, all sewer wells, cesspools, seepage pits, and similar excavations are hereby declared a public nuisance and are prohibited. 19.28.240 Holding tanks. A. All holding tanks are hereby declared a public nuisance and are prohibited. Exception to this prohibition may be granted by the Director of Building and Safety Services: 1. If it is necessary to use a holding tank to abate a nuisance or health hazard caused by a failing OWTS; or 2. For a publicly -owned nonresidential facility necessary for the public health, safety or welfare, where installation of an OWTS is not feasible and a holding tank is determined by the Director of Building and Safety Services to provide the safest and most acceptable method of sewage disposal. B. Where exceptions are granted and holding tank(s) approved, an operating permit issued by the director will be required, which will provide for approval of the tank pumper, maintenance schedule, tank/sewage level monitoring, and reporting requirements. 19.28.250 OWTS failures; Corrective actions required. A. All OWTS failures resulting in effluent surfacing, wastewater surface discharge, or wastewater back-up into plumbing fixtures, shall be reported immediately to Building and Safety Services, upon discovery. B. Building and Safety Services or other designated City departments will complete an investigation within 24 hours to determine the validity of the complaint or other notification of a failing OWTS. C. Any OWTS that is found to be failing shall have a notice of violation issued to the property owner requiring action to eliminate the immediate health hazard through pumping of the septic tank by a licensed sewage hauler or elimination of wastewater flows to the 50 Page 417 failing OWTS. The notice of violation will also require a repair to be completed to the OWTS as needed within a reasonable time frame. D. The proposed repair shall be evaluated by Building and Safety Services to ensure it meets the minimum design requirements of this chapter or is in substantial conformance to the greatest extent practicable. E. Groundwater separation requirements to the bottom of the dispersal system and the highest anticipated groundwater level for repairs shall be as follows: (i) 5 foot for conventional OWTS; (ii) 2 foot for alternative OWTS with supplemental treatment; and (iii) Less than 2 foot separation cannot be allowed through this LAMP and will require a waste discharge permit through the RWQCB. F. The repair shall be completed under permit and inspection by Building and Safety Services. G. Failure to complete the required corrective action within the time frames given will result in additional enforcement action which may include condemnation of the structure for immediate health hazards. 19.28.260 Substandard systems. All OWTS within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that do not meet the minimum design requirements of this Chapter shall be deemed substandard. Sites with substandard OWTS shall be prohibited from having future additions or modifications to the property that would potentially increase wastewater flow to the OWTS or decrease the amount of usable area available for the OWTS. 19.28.270 Abandoned onsite wastewater treatment systems. A. All abandoned OWTS shall be disposed of in accordance with this section. An OWTS Abandonment Permit must be obtained prior to the removal or disposal of any abandoned OWTS. For the purposes of this section, an OWTS shall be considered abandoned if it has been out of service for more than three consecutive months. B. Every OWTS that has been abandoned or has been discontinued from further use or to which no waste or waste discharge pipe from a plumbing fixture is connected must have all remaining sewage removed from, and disposed of by a qualified waste hauler and transported to a dispersal facility that operates in compliance with valid permit issued by a Regional Water Quality Control Board. 51 Page 418 C. Upon removal of all remaining sewage, the tank top and bottom must be crushed, backfilled and compacted with material approved by the director or be removed and disposed of in an approved manner. D. Completion of the above-described work shall require that the property owner obtain a septic tank abandonment permit from the director. 19.28.280 Abatement. To the extent possible, failing OWTS must be brought into compliance with this Code. In case of any failure, malfunction or breakdown of any OWTS, if not corrected within a time designated by the Director, the Director may order or cause corrections to be made and bill the property owner for the costs and may place a lien on the property for the abatement costs. The Director may also order the premises to be vacated if no safe manner of abatement is possible. 19.28.290 Notice of violation. The Director may provide a notice of intent to record a notice of violation to the owner of property upon which a failing or substandard OWTS exists. Notice will be provided to the property owner by mail at the address shown on the latest assessment roll or at any other address of the owner known to the director. The notice will also be posted on the property. The notice will state that within 15 days of the date of the notice, the property owner may request a meeting with the Director to present evidence that a violation does not exist. If, within 15 days of the date of the notice, the property owner does not request a meeting and the violation has not been corrected, or if, after considering the evidence presented by the property owner at the meeting, the Director determines that a code violation in fact exists, the Director may record a notice of violation in the office of the County Recorder. Upon recording the notice, the Director will notify the owner of the action. The notice is to inform all parties that no improvements, including building additions, can be approved while the failing or substandard OWTS continues in operation. At the request of any affected property owner and upon full payment of any fees established by resolution of the city council for recovery of associated enforcement costs and payment of any fee for the recordation of the notice of violation, the Director will issue a notice of expungement of violation upon proof to the director that the noticed violation has been remedied. The notice of expungement may be recorded by the property owner at his or her expense. 52 Page 419 19.28.300 Appeal from denial, revocation or suspension. A. Any person aggrieved by any decision of the Director with respect to the issuance or refusal to issue a OWTS permit may, within ten days of the date of the decision, appeal the decision to the city manager, or his or her designee, by filing a written notice of appeal with the city manager. B. The city manager, or his or her designee, shall thereupon fix a time and place for hearing such appeal within 30 days of the date of said decision. The aggrieved party shall be given notice of the time and place of the hearing by serving the notice personally or by depositing it in the United States Post Office in the city, certified mail, addressed to the aggrieved party at his or her last known address. C. The city manager, or his or her designee, shall have the authority to determine all questions raised on such appeal during the hearing. No such determination shall conflict with any substantive provision of this chapter. D. Following such hearing, the city manager, or his or her designee, may reverse, modify, or affirm the decision of the director with respect to the issuance or refusal to issue a license. The city manager shall render a decision within a reasonable period of time not to exceed 60 days of the conclusion of the hearing. The decision of the city manager, or his or her designee, shall be final. SECTION 3. The City Council declares that, should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence, or word of this Ordinance be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences, and words of this Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. 2018. SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify as to the adoption of this Ordinance. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of , Dennis Michael Mayor I, JANICE REYNOLDS, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the day of 53 Page 420 2018, and was finally passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the day of , 2018, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEMBERS: ATTEST: Janice Reynolds City Clerk 54 Page 421 DATE: August 15, 2018 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Tom Grahn, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2015-00683 — ARCHIBALD OIL — A REQUEST TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL TO GENERAL COMMERCIAL FOR A 1.22 -ACRE SITE LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND ARROW ROUTE; APNS: 0208-291-05 AND 0208-291-06. RELATED FILES: ZONING MAP AMENDMENT DRC2015-00684, DESIGN REVIEW DRC2015- 00682, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2015-00681, VARIANCE DRC2016- 00831, AND MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2017-00879. STAFF HAS PREPARED A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS FOR CONSIDERATION. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONING MAP AMENDMENT DRC2015-00684—ARCHIBALD OIL—A REQUEST TO AMEND THE ZONING MAP LAND USE DISTRICT FROM THE LOW MEDIUM (LM) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT TO THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL (GC) DISTRICT FOR A 1.22 - ACRE SITE LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND ARROW ROUTE; APNS: 0208-291-05 AND 0208-291-06. RELATED FILES: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2015-00683, DESIGN REVIEW DRC2015-00682, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2015- 00681, VARIANCE DRC2016-00831, AND MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2017- 00879. STAFF HAS PREPARED A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS FOR CONSIDERATION. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, Resolution No. 18- 080 approving General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 and Ordinance No. 937 approving Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684. BACKGROUND: On July 11, 2018, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on General Plan Amendment DRC2015- 00683, a proposal to amend the General Plan land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial, and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684, a proposal to amend the Zoning Map land use district from the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the General Commercial (GC) District for 2 parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) with a combined area of 1.22 acres located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Related applications heard by the Planning Commission at that meeting include Design Review DRC2015-00682 to re-establish the operation (including retail sales) of an existing Page 422 vacant/inactive service station, Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-00681 to establish a car wash land use, Variance DRC2016-00831 to reduce the parking setback adjacent to the north property line, and Minor Exception DRC2017-00879 to reduce the number of on-site parking spaces by 1 parking space on the westerly parcel (APN: 0208-291-05); there is no proposal to develop the easterly parcel (APN: 0208-291-06) associated with this project. The existing land uses on, and General Plan land use and zoning designations for the project site and the surrounding properties are as follows: ANALYSIS: A . Background and Project Description: The project site was occupied by an older service station with minimal site improvements. On October 11, 1978, the Planning Commission approved Director Review No. 78-30 for the demolition of that service station and construction of a new service station facility. On-site improvements included the main structure, fuel canopy with two parallel gasoline islands and three underground storage tanks. On December 26, 1980 the Design Review Committee reviewed a revised site plan and building elevations for the proposed service station and found them to be in substantial compliance with the previously approved plans; the existing service station was constructed shortly thereafter. On July 15, 1987, the City Planner approved a minor remodel of the existing service station building. Operations of the most recent service station facility were discontinued in 2002 and the three underground fuel tanks were removed. The site has remained vacant since that time. The applicant proposes to re -activate the gas station and construct an attached car wash (related files: Design Review DRC2015-00682 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-00681, see Attachment 1). Associated with the project are a General Plan Amendment and a Zoning Map Amendment. Approval of the Design Review and Conditional Use Permit applications are contingent on the approval of these amendments by the City Council. B . Urgency Ordinance No. 932: On June 20, 2018, the City Council adopted Urgency Interim Ordinance No. 932 establishing a moratorium on the establishment or expansion of carwashes within the City. On August 1, 2018, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 935 that extended the moratorium by 10 months and 45 days. Project applications that were deemed complete and had paid application fees prior to the adoption of the Urgency Ordinance were exempted from the exclusions of the moratorium. The moratorium is not applicable to the proposed project as all application fees were paid prior to the moratorium's effective date and the application was deemed complete. C. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 and Zonina Mao Amendment DRC2015-00684: The applicant submitted a General Plan Amendment to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and a Zoning Map Amendment to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two parcels at the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Archibald Avenue. In 1978, when the currently existing service Page 423 Land Use General Plan Zoning Inactive service station and Low Medium Low Medium (LM) Site Vacant Residential Residential District Mulberry Early Education Low Medium Low Medium (LM) North Center Residential Residential District General Commercial (GC) South Commercial Center General Commercial District Low Medium Low Medium (LM) East Existing residential Residential Residential District Office Professional (OP) West Vacant Office District ANALYSIS: A . Background and Project Description: The project site was occupied by an older service station with minimal site improvements. On October 11, 1978, the Planning Commission approved Director Review No. 78-30 for the demolition of that service station and construction of a new service station facility. On-site improvements included the main structure, fuel canopy with two parallel gasoline islands and three underground storage tanks. On December 26, 1980 the Design Review Committee reviewed a revised site plan and building elevations for the proposed service station and found them to be in substantial compliance with the previously approved plans; the existing service station was constructed shortly thereafter. On July 15, 1987, the City Planner approved a minor remodel of the existing service station building. Operations of the most recent service station facility were discontinued in 2002 and the three underground fuel tanks were removed. The site has remained vacant since that time. The applicant proposes to re -activate the gas station and construct an attached car wash (related files: Design Review DRC2015-00682 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-00681, see Attachment 1). Associated with the project are a General Plan Amendment and a Zoning Map Amendment. Approval of the Design Review and Conditional Use Permit applications are contingent on the approval of these amendments by the City Council. B . Urgency Ordinance No. 932: On June 20, 2018, the City Council adopted Urgency Interim Ordinance No. 932 establishing a moratorium on the establishment or expansion of carwashes within the City. On August 1, 2018, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 935 that extended the moratorium by 10 months and 45 days. Project applications that were deemed complete and had paid application fees prior to the adoption of the Urgency Ordinance were exempted from the exclusions of the moratorium. The moratorium is not applicable to the proposed project as all application fees were paid prior to the moratorium's effective date and the application was deemed complete. C. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 and Zonina Mao Amendment DRC2015-00684: The applicant submitted a General Plan Amendment to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and a Zoning Map Amendment to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two parcels at the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Archibald Avenue. In 1978, when the currently existing service Page 423 station land use was approved, the project site was located in the Neighborhood Commercial (C-1) District (a carryover from County zoning). In 1981, the City's General Plan identified the parcels as being within the Medium Residential land use designation, and the 1983 Zoning Map identified the parcels as being within the Medium (M) Residential District. A 1984 General Plan Amendment revised the land use designation from Medium Residential to Low Medium Residential. Subsequent amendments to the General Plan and Zoning Map maintained the Low Medium land use designation and Low Medium (LM) Residential District for these parcels, but expanded the land use designation and land use district to properties to the north and east. The proposed General Plan and Zoning Map Amendments are compatible with the existing, though inactive, service station land use. These amendments will allow for a gradual reduction in the intensity of land uses moving northward from the project site. The existing Mulberry Early Education Center provides a buffer between the proposed service station/carwash and the existing single-family uses further to the north. Similarly, the eventual development of the easterly parcel included in this request will provide a buffer for the existing residential land uses to the east. The proposed General Commercial designation is also compatible with the Office designation to the west, the General Industrial designation to the southwest, and the General Commercial designation to the south. The existing surrounding land uses in those directions are of a similar intensity to the proposed service station/carwash and are not expected to be negatively impacted by it. Additionally, the proposed General Plan Amendment is consistent with General Plan policies LU -1.2 and LU -2.4. Policy LU -1.2 states "Designate appropriate land uses to serve the local needs and be able to respond to regional market needs, as appropriate." The re-establishment of the existing service station and development of the carwash land use will serve the local population's automobile relatedneeds, and will support the surrounding community's needs as both Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route are identified as Major Arterials (General Plan Figure CM -2) with a significant daily traffic volume. Policy LU -2.4 states "Promote complementary infill development, rehabilitation, and re -use that contribute positively to the surrounding residential neighborhood areas." The rehabilitation and re -use of this service station facility and the eventual infill development of the vacant easterly parcel will contribute positively to the surrounding residential area by permitting significant site plan and aesthetic improvements to an underutilized project site. At the June 13, 2018 and July 11, 2018 Planning Commission meetings, members of the public raised questions regarding why the City is considering the proposed General Plan and Zoning Map Amendments, questioned the need for additional service stations and car wash facilities at this location, and suggested that other uses, such as a bank or fast food use would be more appropriate. In the early 1980's the City designated the approximate 18 acres on the north side of Arrow Route, between Archibald Avenue and Ramona Avenue to the east, as being within the Low Medium (LM) Residential District, a land use district that could permit residential development a density of 4 to 8 dwelling units per acre. In 2006, the Department of Education developed the Mulberry Early Education Center immediately north of the project site. The development of the school negatively affectedthe project site such that it is extremely unlikely to be usable and/or suitable for residential development due to design and technical standards applicable to residential development in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District. The aforementioned standards would be impractical to meet including minimum requirements for lot area, lot dimensions, building setbacks, and requirements for emergency vehicle access. Additionally, the Development Code establishes a range of land uses that could be appropriate for a given land use district. Here, the re- establishment of a service station land use is appropriate given the existing condition of the property and site constraints that would be applicable to any re -development of the site. In 2017 the California Legislature approved California's 2017 Housing Package, which among other housing bills included Senate Bill No. 166 (SB 166). SB 166 prohibits a City from reducing, requiring, or permitting a reduction of the residential density to a lower residential density that is below the density that was used by the California Department of Housing and Community Development in determining compliance with housing element law, unless the City makes written findings supported by substantial evidence that the reduction is consistent with the General Plan, including the housing element, and that the remaining sites identified in the housing element are adequate to accommodate the City's share of the regional housing need. The City may only reduce the residential density for a parcel if it identifies sufficient sites, so that there is no net loss of residential capacity. When the City prepared the 2013 Page 424 Housing Element Update only vacant parcels were analyzed to address the City's regional housing need (underutilized parcels and those with active development applications were not included) and the City identified an adequate number of vacant parcels to meet the regional housing need. Here, the westerly 0.67 acre service station parcel was not included in the capacity analysis as the City had sufficient vacant residentially zoned parcels to accommodate the regional housing need. The easterly 0.55 acre parcel was identified in the capacity analysis of the Low Medium (LM) Residential District; however, there are sufficient remaining parcels in the Very Low (VL), Low, (L), Low Medium (LM), and Medium (M) Residential Districts to accommodate the Moderate -Income and Above Moderate Income housing need, and this parcel was not included in analysis to demonstrate capacity for the Very Low and Low -Income housing need. B. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study (IS) of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that IS, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures related to Aesthetics, Air Quality, Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Geology and Soils, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Hydrology and Water Quality, Noise, and Tribal Cultural Resources there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation measures for the project. FISCAL IMPACT: The project site currently is assessed an annual property tax. A nominal percentage of this annual tax goes to the City. The proposed development will increase the value of the project site and the City's annual share of the property tax will increase accordingly. The project proponent also will be responsible for paying one-time impact fees. These fees are intended to address the increased demand for City services due to the proposed project. The following types of services that these impact fees would support include: library services, transportation infrastructure, drainage infrastructure, animal services, police, parks, and community and recreation services. The overall project, during construction, may increase construction -related employment and, following its completion, will increase permanent employment due to new commercial uses, and may increase employment at surrounding existing and future businesses that could also provide services to the employees and customers of the project. Further, the project will likely provide a positive fiscal impact to the City through increased on site and surrounding sales tax revenue generation. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This project would address the Council's goal of enhancing the City's position as a premier community in the region by re -activating a vacant commercial property. The proposed General Plan Amendment is consistent with the General Plan Land Use element and its policies related to serving local needs and promoting complementary development. The proposed General Plan Amendment will support the local and surrounding community's needs and will allow for the rehabilitation and re -use of the service station facility. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan as it supports the rehabilitation and re -use of this facility and the site plan and architectural design will minimize any impact to surrounding properties. ATTACHMENTS: Description Attachment 1 - Planning Commission Staff Report 7.11.18 Attachment 2 - Planning Commission Minutes 7.11.18 Attachment 3 - Planning Commission Resolution - General Plan Amendment Attachment 4 - Planning Commission Resolution - Zoning Map Amendment Attachment 5 - Draft Resolution No. 18-080 Page 425 Attachment 6 - Draft Ordinance No. 937 Page 426 s#�+ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REPORTSTAFF DATE: July 11. 2018 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Candyce Burnett, City Planner nJW 5 INITIATED BY: Tom Grahn. Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2015-00683 ARCHIBALD OIL — A request to amend the General Plan land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial for a 1.22 -acre site located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route: APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06. Related Files: Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684, Design Review DRC2015-00682, Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-00681, Variance DRC2016-00831, and Minor Exception DRC2017-00879. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration, This application will be forwarded to the City Council for final action. Continued from June 13 and June 27, 2018. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONING MAP AMENDMENT DRC2015-00684 —ARCHIBALD OIL —A request to amend the Zoning Map land use district from the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the General Commercial (GC) District for a 1.22 -acre site located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683, Design Review DRC2015-00682, Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-00681, Variance DRC2016-00831, and Minor Exception DRC2017-00879 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. This application will be forwarded to the City Council for final action Continued from June 13 and June 27, 2018. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2015-00682 — ARCHIBALD OIL—A request to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re-establish an existing 11481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 square foot car wash on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue: APN 0208-291-05. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684, Conditional Use Permit DRC2015- 00681, Variance DRC2016-00831, and Minor Exception DRC2017-00879. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. Continued from June 13 and June 27. 2018. ENViRCNMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2015-00681 -- ARCHIBALD OIL — A request to establish a 968 square foot Ell —E6 Pg 1 Page 427 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA DRC2015-00683, ZMA DRC2015-00684, DR DRC2015-00682, CUP DRC2015-00681, VAR DRC2016-00831 AND ME DRC2017-00879 — ARCHIBALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 2 automated car wash associated with a request to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building and re-establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue; APN: 0208-291-05. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684, Design Review DRC2015-00682, Variance DRC2016-00831, and Minor Exception DRC2017-00879. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. Continued from June 13 and June 27, 2018. ENVIRONMENTAL' ASSESSMENT AND VARIANCE DRC2016-00831 — ARCHIBALD OIL A request to reduce the parking setback from 10 feet to 5 feet -6 inches for the proposed request to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re-establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 square foot car wash on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue; APN: 0208-291-05. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684, Design Review DRC2015-00682, Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-00681, and Minor Exception DRC2017- 00879. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. Continued from June 13 and June 27, 2018. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2017- 00879 -- ARCHIBALD OIL — A request to reduce on-site parking by 12.5% for the proposed request to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re-establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 square foot car wash on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue; APN: 0208-291-05. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684, Design Review DRC2015-00682, Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-00681, and Variance DRC2016-00831. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative' Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. Continued from June 13 and June 27, 2018. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission take the following actions: Recommend that the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project; and E1—E6 Pg2 Page 428 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA DRC2015-00683, ZMA DRC2015-00684, DR DRC2015-00682, CUP DRC2015-00681, VAR DRC2016-00831 AND ME DRC2017-00879 — ARCHIBALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 3 • Adopt the attached Resolutions recommending that the City Council approve General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684; and • Adopt the attached Resolutions approving Design Review DRC2015-00682, Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-00681, Variance DRC2016-00831, and Minor Exception DRC2017-00879 contingent upon City Council adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts and approval of the General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment. PROJECT REVIEW BACKGROUND: The proposed applications were originally scheduled for Planning Commission consideration on June 13, 2018. During circulation of the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (ISIMND) the City received comments from the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) and the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) regarding, the proposed project. To allow the applicant the time to prepare and submit responses to these comments, and the opportunity for these agencies to confirm acceptance of the applicant's responses, the June 13, 2018 staff report (Exhibit A) recommended the Planning Commission continue the applications to the June 27, 2018 Planning Commission meeting, and the June 27, 2018 staff report (Exhibit B) recommended the Planning Commission continue the applications to the July 11, 2018 Planning Commission meeting. The Commission accepted both of these recommendations and continued the review of these application accordingly. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: The applicant proposes to amend the General Plan land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and to amend the Zoning Map land use district from the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the General Commercial (GC) District for 2 parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) with a combined area of 1.22 acres located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route (Exhibit B). The applicant also proposes to re- establish the operation (including retail sales) of an existing vacant/inactive service station that consists of a 1,728 -square foot service station building, a 1,481 -square foot fuel pump canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and to construct a 968 -square foot car wash on APN: 0208-291-05. There is no proposal for development of APN: 0208-291-06 associated with this project. The site is adjacent to existing vacant, school, residential, and commercial land uses to the north, south, and east, and west as indicated in the following table. E1—E6 Pg3 Page 429 Land Use General Plan , Zoning Inactive service station and Low Medium Low Medium (LM) Site Vacant Residential Residential District Mulberry Early Education Low Medium Low Medium (LM) North Center Residential Residential District South Commercial Center General Commercial General Commercial (GC) District East Existing residential Low Medium Low Medium (LM) Residential Residential District West Vacant Office Office Professional (OP) District E1—E6 Pg3 Page 429 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA DRC2015-00683, ZMA DRC2015-00684, DR DRC2015-00682, CUP DRC2015-00681, VAR DRC2016-00831 AND ME DRC2017-00879 --ARCHIBALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 4 ANALYSIS: A. Background: The project site was occupied by an older service station with minimal site improvements. On October 11, 1978, the Planning Commission approved Director Review No. 78-30 for the demolition of that service station and construction of a new service station facility. Approved improvements included the main structure, fuel canopy with two parallel gasoline islands, and three underground storage tanks. On December 26, 1980 the Design Review Committee reviewed a revised site plan and building elevations for the proposed service station and found them to be in substantial compliance with the previously approved plans; the existing service station was constructed shortly thereafter. On July 15,.1987, the City Planner approved a minor remodel of the existing service station building. Operations of this service station facility were discontinued in 2002 and the three underground fuel tanks were removed. B. Urgency Ordinance No. 932: On June 20, 2018, the City Council adopted Urgency Interim Ordinance No. 932 establishing a moratorium on the establishment or expansion of carwashes within the City. Project applications that had paid application fees prior to the adoption of the Urgency Ordinance were exempted from the exclusions of the moratorium. The moratorium is not applicable to the proposed project as all application fees were paid prior to the moratorium's effective date. C. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015- 00684: The applicant submitted a General Plan Amendment to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and a Zoning Map Amendment to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to. the General Commercial (GC) District for two parcels at the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Archibald Avenue (Exhibits D and E). In 1978, when the currently existing service station [and use was approved, the project site was located in the Neighborhood Commercial (C-1) District (a carryover from County zoning). In 1981, the City's General Plan identified the parcels as being within the Medium Residential land use designation, and the 1983 Zoning Map identified the parcels as being within the Medium (M) Residential District. A 1984 General Plan Amendment revised the land use designation from Medium Residential to Low Medium. Residential. Subsequent amendments to the General Plan and Zoning Map maintained the Low Medium [and use designation and Low Medium (LM) Residential District for these parcels, but expanded the land use designation and land use district to properties to the north and east. The proposed General Pian and Zoning Map Amendments are compatible with the existing, though inactive, service station land use. These amendments will allow for a gradual reduction in the intensity of land uses moving northward from the project site. The existing Mulberry Early Education Center provides a buffer between the proposed service station/carwash and the existing single-family uses further to the north. Similarly, the eventual development of the easterly parcel included in this request will provide a buffer for the existing residential land uses to the east. The proposed General Commercial designation is also compatible with the Office designation to the west, the General Industrial designation to the southwest, and the General Commercial designation to the south. The E1—E6 Pg4 Page 430 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA DRC2015-00683, ZMA DRC2015-00684, DR DRC2015-00682, CUP DRC2015-00681, VAR DRC2016-00831 AND ME DRC2017-00879—ARCHIBALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 5 existing surrounding land uses in those directions are of a similar intensity to the proposed service station/carwash and are not expected to be negatively impacted by it. Additionally, the proposed General Plan Amendment is consistent with General Plan policies LU -1.2 and LU -2.4. Policy LU -1.2 states `Designate appropriate land uses to serve the local needs and be able to respond to regional market needs, as appropriate." The reestablishment of the existing service station and development of the carwash land use will serve the local population's fuel and carwash needs, and will support the surrounding community's needs as both Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route are identified as Major Arterials (General Plan Figure CM -2), with a significant daily traffic volume. Policy LU -2.4 states "Promote complementary infill development, rehabilitation, and re -use that contribute positively to the surrounding residential neighborhood areas." The rehabilitation and reuse of this service station facility and the eventual infill development of the vacant easterly parcel will contribute positively to the surrounding residential area by permitting significant site plan and aesthetic improvements to an underutilized project site. At the June 13, 2018, Planning Commission meeting questions were raised by the public regarding why the City is considering the proposed General Plan and Zoning Map Amendments. In the early 1980's the City designated the approximate 18 acres on the north side of Arrow Route, between Archibald Avenue and Ramona Avenue to the east, as being within the Low Medium (LM) Residential District, a land use district that could permit residential development a density of 4 to 8 dwelling units per acre. In 2006, the Department of Education developed the Mulberry Early Education Center immediately north of the project site. The development of the school resulted in the project site being extremely unlikely as usable and/or suitable for residential development. This is due to the design and technical standards applicable to residential development in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District that would be impractical to meet including, for example, minimum requirements for lot area, lot dimensions, and building setbacks. Also, there are requirements for emergency vehicle access and limitations on driveway access to a major street that would be difficult to address. In 2017 the California Legislature approved California's 2017 Housing Package, which among other housing bills included Senate Bill No. 166 (SB 166). SB 166 prohibits a City from reducing, requiring, or permitting a reduction of the residential density to a lower residential density that is below the density that was used by the California Department of Housing and Community Development in determining compliance with housing element law, unless the City makes written findings supported by substantial evidence that the reduction is consistent with the General Plan, including the housing element, and that the remaining sites identified in the housing element are adequate to accommodate the City's share of the regional housing need. The City may only reduce the residential density for a parcel if it identifies sufficient sites, so that there is no net loss of residential capacity. When the City prepared the 2013 Housing Element Update only vacant parcels were analyzed to address the City's regional housing need (underutilized parcels and those with active development applications were not included) and the City identified an adequate number of vacant parcels to meet the regional housing need. Here, the westerly 0.67- acre service station parcel was not included in the capacity analysis as the City had sufficient vacant residentially zoned parcels to accommodate the regional housing need. The easterly 0.55 acre was identified E1—E6 Pg5 Page 431 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA DRC2015-00683, ZMA DRC2015-00684, DR DRC2015-00682, CUP DRC2015-00681, VAR DRC2016-00831 AND ME DRC2017-00879—ARCH [BALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 6 in the capacity analysis of the Low Medium (LM) Residential District; however, there are sufficient remaining parcels in the Very Low (VL), Low, (L), Low Medium (LM), and Medium (M) Residential Districts to accommodate the Moderate -Income and Above Moderate Income housing .need, and this parcel was not included in analysis to demonstrate capacity for the Very Low and Low-income housing need. D. Design Review DRC2015-00682: The application proposes to utilize the existing service station building for retail food sales, reuse the existing fuel canopy, and construct a new 968 square foot carwash at the southeast corner of the service station building (Exhibits F, G, and H). The project will retain the existing driveway at the northwest corner of the site, close the existing driveway at the southwest corner of the site, and relocate the existing driveway at the southeast corner of the site to a new shared driveway for the project site and the vacant property to the east; both driveways will be provided with decorative paving. Asphalt paving covers most of the site, with no identified parking spaces on-site; however, site improvements include the installation of landscape planters along the entire north and east property lines, and the striping of 7 parking spaces. The existing trash enclosure will be relocated to the northeast corner of the project site. Project circulation will provide for two- way access from each driveway to the food store and fuel canopy. Due to site constraints, only one-way access will be allowed around the north side of the food store, to the carwash, and exiting to Arrow Route. The existing service station building is constructed out of tan brick and terra cotta roof tiles and the fuel canopy is constructed out of metal posts and terra cotta roof tiles. The applicant proposes a complete redesign of project architecture for the existing service station and fuel canopy buildings (Exhibit 1). Proposed architecture for the service station, carwash, and fuel canopy is for a contemporary commercial structure utilizing common materials and finishes. The exterior of the service station/carwash building proposes to use a mixture of earth tone colored stucco and stone veneer wainscoting as well as additional architectural elements including tower elements, roof tiles, exposed rafter tails, aluminum store front windows, and green screen, all to add visual interest to the building design. The exterior of the fuel canopy building proposes the installation of river rock wainscot at the base of the canopy structure. The elevations for the fuel canopy proposed metal panels and tenant signage on the roof structure; however, staff comments from the Design Review Committee (Exhibit L) identified removing the architectural treatment/signage on the fuel canopy and to retain the existing terra cotta roof tiles.. The Design Review Committee supported this recommendation and recommended approval of the project. The Development Code Chapter 17.90.030 regulates Drive -In and Drive -Through Use and specifically identifies that uses with drive-through facilities shall be located 300 feet away from any intersection; however, per the Development Code"deviations to these provisions may be considered through the issuance of a site plan and Architectural [Design] Review Permit." The proposed site plan (Exhibit F) and building elevations (Exhibit 1) were submitted as part of the plans associated with the proposed project. The proposed carwash is attached to, and integrated into, the design of the existing gas station building. It functions on the project site as an accessory use to the gas station. It is also screened as much as possible as seen from the intersection. Furthermore, the plotting of the carwash allows for full vehicular circulation and emergency access around the site. Due to these design E1—E6 Pg6 Page 432 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA DRC2015-00683, ZMA DRC2015-00684, DR DRC2015-00682, CUP DRC2015-00681, VAR DRC2016-00831 AND ME DRC2017-00879 — ARCHIBALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 7 characteristics, the Design Review Committee's recommendation of approval, and the Planning Commission's consideration of this proposal, which if approved, the 300 -foot setback is not necessary. E. Prolect Parking Analysis: The Development Code (Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code (RCMC) Section 17.64) establishes parking requirements for the project as follows: Land Use Parking Ratio Parking Spaces Total Parking Spaces Required Provided Service 3.0 Per 1,000 Square Feet, 5.1 5 Station Plus 2 Per Service Ba Carwash 2.5 Per Wash Bay 2.5 2 Total Parking Spaces Required 8 Total Parking Spaces Provided 7 F. Conditional Use Permit DRC2016-00681: The Development Code (RCMC Section 17.16.120.A) identifies that a Conditional Use Permit provides a process for a determination of requests for uses and activities whose effects on adjacent sites and surroundings need to be evaluated in terms of a specific development proposal for a specific site. Uses iqua[ifying for a Conditional Use Permit are considered minor in nature, only have an impact on immediately adjacent properties, and can be modified and/or conditioned to ensure compatibility. Within the proposed General Commercial (GC) District, service stations are a permitted land use, and car washes are permitted, subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. Here, the service station building and fuel pump canopy are existing and will be adapted for reuse, subject to some architectural and site planning modifications and improvements. The carwash building will be located on the east side of the service station building, is designed for architectural compatibility, will operate as an automated facility, and is situated on the parcel to minimize the potential for any impacts to adjacent property. The findings of facts below support the necessary Conditional Use Permit findings, which are required by the City's Development Code: Finding: The proposed use is allowed within the applicable zoning district and complies with all other applicable provisions of this Zoning Code, Municipal Code, General Plan, and any applicable Specific Plans or City regulations/standards. Fact: The proposed project includes amendments to the General Plan and Zoning Map to change the [and use designation and zoning of the subject properties to General Commercial and General Commercial (GC) District. Within the General Commercial (GC) District, service stations are a permitted land use and carwashes are a permitted land use, subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. The proposed service station facility was designed to be compatible with all applicable development standards of the Development Code, except for the number of parking spaces and the minimum parking setback, which are addressed in the corresponding Variance and Minor Exception applications. E1 --E6 Pg7 Page 433 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA DRC2015-00683, ZMA DRC2015-00684, DR DRC2015-00682, CUP DRC2015-00681, VAR DRC2016-00831 AND ME DRC2017-00879—ARCHIBALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 8 Finding: The site is physically suited for the type, density, and intensity of the proposed use including access, utilities, and the absence of physical constraints and can be conditioned to meet all related performance criteria and development standards. Fact. The project site is currently developed as a service station land use, although it has been inactive since 2002. The project site is suitable for a service station land use, provides appropriate site access, has all utility services available, and can be conditioned to meet all related performance criteria and development standards for a service station and carwash facility. Finding: Granting the permit would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity in which the project is located. Fact: Subject to approval of the related General Plan and Zoning Map Amendments, establishment of the proposed service station and carwash facility will not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity in which the project is located. The project was designed to meet all applicable Development Code standards, performance criteria, and can be conditioned appropriately to minimize any potential impacts to adjacent properties. G. Variance DRC2016-00831: The proposed project includes :an amendment to the Zoning Map to change the zoning of the subject properties to General Commercial (GC) District. Within the General Commercial (GC) District the Development Code establishes a minimum interior side parking setback (adjacent to residential) of 10 feet (RCMC Table 17.36.030-1). Further, Footnote 3 to this table identifies that the setback to parking and/or building shall be landscaped. The property to the north will remain in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District and the property to the east is proposed to be changed to the General Commercial (GC) District. The proposed site plan delineates 7 parking spaces on the project site, 4 of which are located 5.5 feet from the north property line. The findings of facts below support the necessary Variance findings, which are required by the City's Development Code: Fin_ ding: Strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would result in a difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this Code. /;act: Commercial development standards establish landscaped setbacks to separate and buffer between adjacent land uses. The proposed setback reduction is necessary due to design constraints between the existing service station use and the proposed carwash and how this facility relates to adjacent properties. Specifically, the service station building is located in the center of, the project site and the fuel pump canopy is located between the service station building and the Archibald Avenue street frontage. The addition of the carwash building adjacent to the service station, the addition of perimeter landscaping, and 7 additional parking spaces does makes enforcement of the development standard inconsistent with the objectives of the Development Code as 4 of the proposed parking spaces had to shift northly to provide sufficient room for on-site circulation around the north side of the service station building. 1;1-1;6 Pg8 Page 434 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA DRC2015-00683, ZMA DRC2015-00684, DR DRC2015-00682, CUP DRC2015-00681, VAR DRC2016-00831 AND ME DRC2017-00879—ARCHIBALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 9 Finding: There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone. Fact: The existing project site is developed with the service station building, fuel canopy, street adjacent landscaping, minimal interior landscaping, and property line adjacent asphalt paving. Proposed improvements to reuse the service station `building and fuel canopy, modify existing driveway access, install delineated parking spaces, and property line adjacent landscaping will significantly improve the appearance of a non -conforming site. Although the proposed parking is located 5.5 feet away from the property line, vehicles on- site were previously able to park property line adjacent. Proposed project improvements will allow for the addition of a landscaped buffer between existing land uses to the north and proposed improvements on-site. Finding: Strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same zone. Fact: The setback reduction allows landscaping and parking to be distributed throughout the entire project site. There are numerous properties within the General Commercial (GC) District developed under either County standards prior to incorporation, or to City standards that permitted parking either at a 5 -foot minimum setback, or immediately adjacent to the property line. The strict enforcement of the required setback would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the same General Commercial (GC) District and/or require a redesign of the project, which is impractical as potential alternate solutions are limited by existing improvements on the project site. Finding: The granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same zone. Fact: The project site is located in a proposed General Commercial (GC) District, which was designed to accommodate a variety of land uses. There are numerous properties within the General Commercial (GC) District developed under either County standards prior to incorporation, or to City standards that permitted parking either at a 5 -foot minimum setback, or immediately adjacent to the property line. The approval of this Variance application will not constitute a grant of special privilege as other properties in the same General Commercial (GC) District enjoy the property right requested. Finding: The granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. Fact: The requested reduction in the parking setback will not negatively impact the adjacent property owners. The closest building within the existing Mulberry Early Education Center is situated- approximately 160 feet north of the shared property line with the project site, with parking and landscaping located between their facility and their south property line. Due to the existing building separation, the proposed setback reduction will not negatively impact properties or improvements in the vicinity. E1 --E6 Pg9 Page 435 PLANNING COMMfSSION STAFF REPORT GPA DRC2015-00683, ZMA DRC2015-00684, DR DRC2015-00682, CUP DRC2015-00681, VAR DRC2016-00831 AND ME DRC2017-00879 —ARCHIBALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 10 H. Minor Exception DRC2017-00879: Parking for the project site is based on a summation of parking requirements for the retail, fuel sales, and carwash land uses. Based upon these requirements a total of 8 parking spaces are required; however, due to site constraints, only 7 parking spaces are provided. A Minor Exception application was submitted to reduce the total on-site parking by 1 parking space, a proposed 12.5 percent reduction in the on-site parking requirement. A Minor Exception (RCMC, Section 17.16.110) may be granted to modify development standards provided certain findings can be made, and provides for up to a 25 percent reduction in required on-site parking. The findings of fact below support the necessary findings, which are required by the City's Development Code. Finding: The Minor Exception is consistent with the General Plan or any applicable specific plan or Development Agreement. Fact: The proposed reduction in the required number of parking spaces is consistent with the Genera]' Plan, which has stated policies to designate appropriate land uses to support local community needs (LU -1.2) and to support development complementary infill development, rehabilitation, and reuse that contribute positively to the surrounding residential neighborhood areas (Policy LU -2.4). The proposed parking reduction is necessary due to design constraints between the existing service station use and the proposed carwash. Finding: The proposed development is compatible with existing and proposed land uses in the surrounding area. Fact: The proposed project is compatible with the surrounding land uses as the project site is within the existing Low Medium (LM) Residential District and proposed General Commercial (GC) District, which will permit the re-establishment of the service station land use. The proposed project will rehabilitate and reuse an existing service station building that has been closed since 2002 and the redesign and reuse of a project site that will contribute positively to the surrounding area. Finding: The proposed exception to the specific development standard(s) is necessary to allow creative design solutions compatible with the desires of the community and/or to accommodate unique site conditions. Fact: The proposed parking reduction is necessary due to design constraints between the existing service station use and the proposed carwash. Specifically, the service station building is located in the center of the project site and the fuel pump canopy is located between the service station building and the Archibald Avenue street frontage. The addition of the carwash building adjacent to the service station, the addition of perimeter landscaping, and the addition of 7 other parking spaces does not provide the opportunity to add any additional parking. Finding: The granting of the Minor Exception will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district, and will not be detrimental to public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious properties or improvements in the vicinity. E1—E6 Pg 10 Page 436 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA DRC2015-00683, ZMA DRC2015-00684, DR DRC2015-00682, CUP DRC2015-00681, VAR DRC2016-00831 AND ME DRC2017-00879 — ARCHIBALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 11 Fact: The proposed reduction in the required number of parking spaces is not a grant of special privilege in that the Development Code allows flexibility to reduce the required number of parking spaces where the applicant has demonstrated that the project will provide adequate parking for all on-site uses. Operation and use of the fuel pumps does not require someone patronizing the project site to enter the service station building as fuel can be purchased directly at the fuel pump. Operation and use of the carwash facility is automated and a carwash can be purchased directly at the carwash facility. There is sufficient parking on-site to support the patronage of the service station food store. Neighborhood Meeting: A neighborhood meeting was conducted to gather input and comments from the owners of the surrounding properties located within 660 feet of the project site. This meeting was held at the Rancho Cucamonga Family Resource Center on May 14, 2018. Three people attended the meeting, two of which are adjacent property owners. The applicant's representative provided an overview of the project and informed the residents of the project access from Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, existing and proposed on-site improvements, overall site design and proposed improvements, site access and a future shared driveway at Arrow Route, and the anticipated construction schedule. The most notable issue raised related to the proposed driveway at Arrow Route. The property owner of the adjacent parcel (APN: 0208-291-06) questioned the alignment of the proposed driveway, which is not shown centered on the property line between the two parcels. Conditions of approval for the project will require the applicant to provide an easement along the easterly portion of 8477 Archibald. Avenue (the project site, APN: 0208- 291-05) for the benefit of the parcel to the east (APN: 0208-291-06) for ingress and egress prior to building permit issuance. When the parcel to the east develops they will be required to provide an easement along the westerly portion of their property for ingress and egress, for a shared driveway. If the parcel to the east will allow the easement along the westerly portion of their property, concurrently with the development of 8477 Archibald Avenue, the driveway may be centered between the two properties. Design Review Committee: The project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (Macias, Oaxaca, and Smith) on October 31, 2017 (Exhibit L). No major issues were identified and the Design Review Committee recommended approval of the project to the Planning Commission. K. Technical Review Committee: The project was reviewed and approved by the Technical Review Committee on October 31, 2017. The Technical Review Committee recommended approval of the project to the Planning Commission. Their conditions of approval are included in the Design Review Resolution and attached Conditions of Approval. L. Tribal Consultation (Senate Bill 18 and Assembly Bill 52): As required by Senate Bill 18 (SB 18), the City submitted Tribal Consultation Requests for General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 to the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians -- Kizh Nation, Gabrieleno/Tongva Nation, Gabrieieno/Tongva San Gabriel Band of Mission Indians, 'San Manual Band of Mission Indians, and the Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians. The notices were mailed on August 25, 2015 and provided for a 90 -day comment period ending on E1—E6 Pg 11 Page 437 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA DRC2015-00683, ZMA DRC2015-00684, DR DRC2015-00682, CUP DRC2015-00681, VAR DRC2016-00831 AND ME DRC2017-00879 -- ARCHIBALD OIL July 11, 2018. Page 12 November 18, 2015. Of the 5 tribes who were notified, none submitted a response requesting consultation during the notification period. As required by Assembly Bill 52 (AB 52), the City submitted Tribal Consultation Requests to the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation, Morongo Band of Mission Indians, San Gabriel Band of Mission Indians, San Manual Band of Mission Indians, Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians, and the Torres Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians following a completeness determination for Design Review DRC2015-00682. The notices were mailed on February 14, 2018 and provided for a 30 -day comment period ending on March 19, 2018. On February 20, 2018 the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation responded with a request for consultation, which was held on March 28, 2018. Tribal comments from that consultation are included in the proposed mitigation measures. Should any undocumented archaeological or cultural resources be discovered during ground disturbing activities, adherence to the proposed mitigation measures will ensure that all impacts will be less than significant. M. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study (IS) of the potential environmental effects of the project (Exhibit N). Based on the findings contained in that IS, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures related to Aesthetics, Air Quality, Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Geology and Soils, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Hydrology and Water Quality, Noise, and Tribal Cultural Resources there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation measures for the project. A comment letter (Exhibit P) was received from the Burrtec Waste Industries, dated May 18, 2018, in response to the circulated IS/MND. Burrtec's comment addressed AS 341 and AS 1826, which requires that commercial businesses generating more than four cubic yards of waste per week participate in a commercial waste recycling program, and that businesses that sell food must also participate in a food waste recycling program. The project will require at least a 3 -cubic yard bin each for waste and mixed recyclables and should also make provisions for an additional bin for food waste. Conditions of approval require the applicant to provide adequate trash bins for waste, recyclables, and food waste. A comment letter (Exhibit Q) was received from the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), dated May 23, 2018, in response to the circulated IS/MND. The DTSC's comments questioned whether any historic uses at the project site may have resulted in any release of hazardous waste/substances, if a Phase 1 Environmental Assessment had been prepared, if there are any PCB containing transformers on-site, whether underground storage tanks were used at the site, and if there is soli contamination or groundwater contamination on- site. A Phase 1 Environmental Assessment has not been prepared, the applicant indicated that there are none, and have never been, any PCB containing transformers on the project site, the underground storage tanks were previously removed, and provided a Remedial E1 --E6 Pg12 Page 438 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA DRC2015-00683, ZMA DRC2015-00684, DR DRC2015-00682, CUP DRC2015-00681, VAR DRC2016-00831 AND ME DRC2017-00879 — ARCHIBALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 13 Action Completion Certificate, dated November 5, 2001. The Remedial Action Completion Certificate was issued by the County of San Bernardino Fire Department, Office of the Fire Marshall, Hazardous Materials Division for the project site indicating that no further remedial action is required. On June 13, 2018, the DTSC indicated that they have reviewed the applicant's response and had no further comments. A comment letter (Exhibit R) was received from the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), dated May 29, 2018, in response to the circulated iSIMND. The SCAQMD's comments identified that since a permit is required by the SCAQMD they should be identified as a Responsible Agency on the MND and that the Final MND should demonstrate compliance with SCAQMD Rules. The SCAQMD indicated that the Air Quality analysis did not include operational ROG emissions generated from storage tanks or from the fueling process and recommended that a Health Risk Assessment analysis be prepared. The SQAQMD recommended a modification to the Air Quality Mitigation Measure, Short Term (Construction) Emissions, which has been revised in the attached Design Review Resolution of Approval. Finally, the SCAQMD recommended utilizing the current CalEEMod (Version 2016.3.2) in the air quality analysis. On June 6, 2018, the applicant's consultant (MD Acoustics) responded to SCAQMD comments. That response 1) recognized compliance with AQMD Rules 201, 203, and 461; 2) analyzed operational ROG emissions generated from the storage tanks and from the fueling process and found them to be below the daily VOC threshold; 3) identified that the project is below a threshold that would require a Health Risk Assessment; 4) analyzed and acknowledged the distance to sensitive receptors; 5) addressed compliance with CARB Tier 3; and 6) acknowledged that "revising the construction and operational emissions calculations is not expected to change the less than significant findings in the MND." On June 21, 2018, the SCAQMD concurred with the applicant's response and had no further comments. FISCAL_ IMPACT/PROPERTY TAX AND IMPACT FEES: The project site currently is assessed an annual property tax. A percentage of this annual tax is shared with the City. The proposed development will increase the value of the project site and the City's annual share of the property tax will increase accordingly. The project proponent also will be responsible for paying one-time impact fees. These fees are intended to address the increased demand for City services due to the proposed project. The following types of services that these impact fees would support include the following: library services, transportation infrastructure, drainage infrastructure, animal services, police, parks, and community and recreation services. The overall project, during construction may increase construction -related employment and, following its completion, will increase employment due to new commercial uses, and may increase employment at surrounding existing and future businesses that will provide services to the employees and customers of the project. Also, a positive fiscal impact for the City will occur through increased sales tax revenue generated by the employees and customer patronage of local businesses. E1 --E6 Pg13 Page 439 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA DRC2015-00683, ZMA DRC2015-00684, DR DRC2015-00682, CUP DRC2015-00681, VAR DRC2016-00831 AND ME DRC2017-00879 — ARCHIBALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 14 COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Although a specific current City Council goal does not apply to the project, the project is consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan and the objectives of the Development Code. The proposed General Plan Amendment is consistent with the General Plan Land Use element and its policies related to serving local needs and promoting complementary development. The proposed General Plan Amendment will support the local and surrounding community's needs and will allow for the rehabilitation and re -use of the service station facility. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan as it supports the rehabilitation and re -use of this facility and the site plan and architectural design will minimize any impact to surrounding properties. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660 -foot radius of the project site. No comments were received in response to these notifications. EXHIBITS: Exhibit A Planning Commission Staff Report dated June 13, 2018 Exhibit B - Planning Commission Staff Report dated June 27, 2018 Exhibit C - Site Utilization Map Exhibit D - General Plan Land Use Designation Exhibit E - Zoning Map Land Use District Exhibit F - Site Plan Exhibit G - Existing Improvements Site Plan Exhibit H - Proposed Improvements Site Plan Exhibit I - Floor Plan and Elevations Exhibit J - BMP Plan Exhibit K - Site Drainage Plan Exhibit L - Design Review Committee Comments and Action Agenda, October 31, 2017 Exhibit M - Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration with a location map Exhibit N - Initial Study (Parts I, 11 & III) Exhibit O - Mitigation Monitoring Program Exhibit P - Burrtec Waste Industries, Inc., letter dated May 18, 2018 Exhibit Q - Department of Toxic Substances Control letter dated May 23, 2018, with Applicant's response dated June 4, 2018 Exhibit R - South Coast Air Quality Management District letter dated May 29, 2018, with Applicant's response dated June 6, 2018 Draft Resolution Recommending Approval of General Pian Amendment'DRC2015-00683 Draft Resolution Recommending Approval of Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 Draft Resolution of Approval for Design Review DRC2015-00682 Draft Resolution of Approval for Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-00681 Draft Resolution of Approval for Variance DRC2016-00831 Draft Resolution of Approval for Minor Exception DRC2017-00879 CB:TG/Is E1—E6 Pg14 Page 440 STAFF REPORT DATE: June 13, 2018 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Candyce Burnett, City Planner rO' INITIATED BY: Tom Grahn, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2015-00683 -- ARCHIBALD OIL -- A request to amend the General Plan land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial for a 1.22 -acre site located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route; APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06. Related Files: Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684, Design Review DRC2015-00682, Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-00681, Variance DRC2016-00831, and Minor Exception DRC2017-00879. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. This application will be forwarded to the City Council for final action. ENVIRONMENTAL. ASSESSMENT AND ZONING MAP AMENDMENT DRC2015-00684 — ARCHIBALD OIL — A request to amend the Zoning Map land use district from the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the General Commercial (GC) District for a 1.22-2cre site located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route; APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683, Design Review DRC2015-00682, Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-00681, Variance DRC2016-00831, and Minor Exception DRC2017-00879. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. This application will be forwarded to the City Council for final action. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2015-00682 -- ARCHIBALD OIL -- A request to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re-establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 square foot car wash on a 29,456 square foot (0,676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, Ionated at 8477 Archibald Avenue, APN' 0208-291-05, Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684, Conditional Use Permit DRC2015- 00681, Variance DRC2016-00831, and Minor Exception DRC2017-00879. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2015-00681 — ARCHIBALD OIL —A request to establish a 968 square foot automated car wash associated with a request to establish retail sales in an EXHIBIT A E1—E6Pg15 Page 441 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, DRC2015-00682, DRC2015-00681, DRC2016-00831 AND DRC2017-00879 --ARCHIBALD OIL June 13, 2018 Page 2 existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building and re-establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue; APN: 0208-291-05. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684, Design Review DRC2015-00682, Variance DRC2016-00831, and Minor Exception DRC2017-00879. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VARIANCE DRC2016-00831 -- ARCHIBALD OIL — A request to reduce the parking setback from 10 feet to 5 feet -6 inches for the proposed request to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re-establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 square foot car wash on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM). Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue; APN: 0208-291-05. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684, Design Review DRC2015-00682, Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-00681, and Minor Exception DRC2017- 00879. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2017- 00879 — ARCHIBALD OIL — A request to reduce on-site parking by 12.5% for the proposed request to establish retail safes in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re-establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy -with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 square foot car wash on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue; APN: 0208-291-05. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684, Design Review DRC2015-00682, Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-00681, and Variance DRC2016-00831. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission continue the project to the June 27, 2018 Planning Commission Meeting. BACKGROUND The proposed General Plan Amendment, Zoning Map Amendment, and Design Review and related applications were scheduled for the June 13, 2018 Planning Commission meeting. However, following circulation of the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project staff received comments from the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) and EII--E6 Pg16 Page 442 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, DRC2015-00682, DRC2015-00681, DRC2016-00831 AND DRC2017-00879 — ARCHIBALD OIL .dune 13, 2018 Page 3 the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) that required further analysis. The applicant's consultants have prepared responses to those comments and the City will be requesting concurrence from both agencies so that a proper staff review and evaluation can be included in the Planning Commission staff report. CB:TGIIs E1—E6 Pg17 Page 443 DATE: June 27, 2018 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Candyce Burnett, City PlanneC INITIATED BY: Tom Grahn, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2015-00683 — ARCHIBALD OIL — A request to amend the General Plan land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial for a 1.22 -acre site located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route; APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06. Related Files: Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684, Design Review DRC2015-00682, Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-00681, Variance DRC2016-00831, and Minor Exception DRC2017-00879. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. This application will be forwarded to the City Council for final action. EXHIBIT B ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONING MAP AMENDMENT DRC2015-00684 — ARCHIBALD OIL — A request to amend the Zoning Map land use district from the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the General Commercial (GC) District for a 1.22 -acre site located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route; APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683, Design Review DRC2015-00682, Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-00681, Variance DRC2016-00831, and Minor Exception DRC2017-00879. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. This application will be forwarded to the City Council for final action. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2015-00682 — ARCHIBALD OIL — A request to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re-establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 square foot car wash on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel an the Low Medium (LM) Residential .District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at.the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue; APN: 0208-291-05. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684, Conditional Use Permit DRC2015- 00681, Variance DRC2016-00831, and Minor Exception DRC2017-00879. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2015-00681 — ARCHIBALD OIL — A request to establish a 968 square foot automated car wash associated with a request to establish retail sates in an E1 --E6 Pg18 Page 444 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, DRC2015-00682, DRC2015-00681, DRC2016-00831 AND DRC2017-00879 —ARCHIBALD OIL June 27, 2018 Page 2 existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building and re-establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue; APN: 0208-291-05. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684, Design Review DRC2015-00682, Variance DRC2016-00831, and Minor Exception DRC2017-00879. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VARIANCE DRC2016-00831 -- ARCHIBALD OIL — A request to reduce the parking setback from 10 feet to 5 feet -6 inches for the proposed request to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re-establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 square foot car wash on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue; APN: 0208-291-05. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684, Design Review DRC2015-00682, Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-00681, and Minor Exception DRC2017- 00879. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2017- 00879 — ARCHIBALD OIL — A request to reduce on-site parking by 12.5% for the proposed request to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re-establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 square foot car,wash on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue; APN: 0208-291-05. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684, Design Review DRC2015-00682, Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-00681, and Variance DRC2016-00831. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission continue the project to the July 11, 2018 Planning Commission Meeting. BACKGROUND: The proposed General Plan Amendment, Zoning Map Amendment, and Design Review and related applications were continued from the June 13, 2018 to the June 27, 2018 Planning Commission meetings. Following circulation of the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, staff received comments from the South Coast Air Quality Management District ET—E6 Pg19 Page 445 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, DRC2015-00682, DRC2015-00681, DRC2016-00831 AND DRC2017-00879 — ARCHIBALD OIL June 27, 2018 Page 3 (SCAQMD) and the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) that required further analysis. The applicant's consultants prepared responses to those comments, which were submitted to both the DTSC and the SCAQMD. The DTSC indicated that they have no further comments; however, the SCAQMD is still reviewing the information provided. The City is requesting concurrence from both agencies so that a proper staff review and evaluation can be included in the Planning Commission staff report. CB:TGIjy E1 --E6 Pg20 Page 446 Li -i P= D LLI F - Mr ATAVA TWS ic LU O Wz ww 1 0 1 c . M 202 CD INS 42 409 T --w T7----7 AV qQ 6i Zwz = A Allhvdllwn AWO,31oM� EXHIBIT C E1 -E6 Pg21 III Page 447 Generai Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 Archibald Oil Existing: Low Medium Residentie Proposed; General Commercial EXHIBIT D E1—E6Pg22 Page 448 Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 - Archibald Oil Mom Essom = Irapose ■■■■■■U M ogo 1011111110 Rollo oil. 10111 III■ ` ' EXHIBIT E E1 -E6 Pg23 Page 449 .rrW� ilLlly [:l r—'��t Wit 1's 11Mxr101 ,1AntOp �rx lrximxl:lt iifli T] rhrioll Vali clu+ rs .,Imwrss7 au;n.7, 31'n3.5Y Q,riMlrr ttli SileCdr �E� l •,�. .Sf GG ,J! <I i'�' �l i � ,� t C —� .... N� _ N y �� P� -'�71 > r� ��i � �� N [Yn�il Ml rpeeiM I3L+Sx. •oyl::trl niprwl4T •Ynlx3+lliil s {'i 7 0 ❑ d'i C l E ur � CD a I..+rs..+lrn+s.iY.wwmr7 ±dulrw�w'3 UArIir lW li n H57i•4k37] {NI 4177 0717 SUI3YI]AObdWt 131 30va9drs u5'}/` MtlZyg l�Q•t4U - P S � = S � i ; t 3. � Q � yE m •.' — fz • s � r $� YW �'aQ •�i •, MODIFY 10 APPROACH t 1 1. FIRE FRAK W D tYi v Y o w EAMBIT 3, 7i: @3 u O sy5 9Y�g 0 ❑ : CD � � J W •-;t .�s.. � gg -x It ;t y MtlZyg r -a L/] - - • a Q � yE m •.' — CD o"i LJ l'71n$+ Slvrl .moi u £oz o :7 u� ONYl 1NV37A 3 .00 OL1`"�� h1 'd O�b91 Mol � JJ5/Q S a i t Z'S — •: '•JC � y S t Y } LL d y Y c '•i y O X41!2�Ovcb�-n u+ EF - - -` 7 1 a z _ I 9•.75 .0-.31 — �y r 3r.9 iil I 1 J V iilll P -� x ..0•.57 i i i i i a IK ✓• ti I N 111 I I #—..B-.91— -L t • ! 573815 3U 37714 IN t S33d15 !b 317N 131 .01 td J Q '.�rl >r R vl N I_.IJ sae � ,L -,9Z •:.dI-,tk: v CD... ••. i t ..9 o g o- ------------- ------------ ---------- cy- --------- -- t., ¢ v c o & Iy } ,9:�f dt,kllr7l --------- IT Q ---- -------' a a CL LLJ CD LLJ V) II 3 - --� C) o / O a r) 3 _ I NDHV ---------- _----� - i E1 -E6 Pg24 Page 450 W t 3Z' -O• - — 1 MODIFY 10 APPROACH t 1 1. FIRE FRAK W D tYi v Y o w EAMBIT =o F h1 'd O�b91 Mol � JJ5/Q S a i t Z'S — •: '•JC � y S t Y } LL d y Y c '•i y O X41!2�Ovcb�-n u+ EF - - -` 7 1 a z _ I 9•.75 .0-.31 — �y r 3r.9 iil I 1 J V iilll P -� x ..0•.57 i i i i i a IK ✓• ti I N 111 I I #—..B-.91— -L t • ! 573815 3U 37714 IN t S33d15 !b 317N 131 .01 td J Q '.�rl >r R vl N I_.IJ sae � ,L -,9Z •:.dI-,tk: v CD... ••. i t ..9 o g o- ------------- ------------ ---------- cy- --------- -- t., ¢ v c o & Iy } ,9:�f dt,kllr7l --------- IT Q ---- -------' a a CL LLJ CD LLJ V) II 3 - --� C) o / O a r) 3 _ I NDHV ---------- _----� - i E1 -E6 Pg24 Page 450 r)ia'rxr � 4r:]it5r..ia:w, xa�, •;niul•x Dail, _ ,, � uSn G HSVMev]{v1COV OXVS1NMAOddWl(3130VHDdn 8p f!0 Q t= O ? o Q N LLJ LLJ _$ 4 CIL o � Ir o w _ c nl 3 C/i g , O o n 3 ' 000�s /y J L r C r N (-j m W a �. I- v) Q W N N ilvM 313tf]Kp] H91H ,5 131 •L9;_fi. 33vd5 N1)i 131 • Z I \jIII 4 d n ' .I .E -,ES* aK = QI N � Q N � o IL w w 7 = Z b Y � U O 4 >L 7 - r = N �Nm ate^ a o Al --• z �a� c a —t-.ZZ„5-.5( x � m zr---------- � I I Jy 1 I I I t n ! o o I z —a I o I � W: 30 -0. - - t W - 3r -r tEl APPROACH - [El APPROA(I -inNIAV a]e91HMV—�---- E1—E6 Pgzs Page 451 -- llL�:xv-4va1LSSvenle.xr u:Y va9lvin lfikl � - v � [� �+ C Y• - a C j1II MMI, rrl;aISvv lry lxvi: N O a ! srlms.o, mrwery HS VNiCVJ {N} QOy ()y I N W t7a W v ,--� V S_ 3 3AOtIdbJ1131 3s�Vt19dii 1 1 1 r � I II II 4, 1 o r• ®' � •,Im� p� y i ZZ 5s L .ZZ S ,Sl—i—h—.A-.RL A .9Z I . . r ---------- ^1 o ------------- a ------------- ZL a ,•l •LL/ ti ... • m W I I � I� W� I LL t. ® a •T ---------- q ! _ - LL w y o W{ i LI I I .'1 I 13 - .. t --.l _L«_ w_3T-9•---- — Wify M APPROACH w EXHIBIT H 11 _�== and a�veiHDav JPage 452 I I a ZA o .'. o. a 0 0 g' �. i W 4 2 a :R� -..9-.Z:-'.f ^+- � I � -• --y _ �; -fir - "' II11 I :'�:w.• _ i iii m •I o \ 1 4 ,-a� �'p ONVI 1NV3VA ii -9•.z .9-.4 r � I II II 4, 1 o r• ®' � •,Im� p� y i ZZ 5s L .ZZ S ,Sl—i—h—.A-.RL A .9Z I . . r ---------- ^1 o ------------- a ------------- ZL a ,•l •LL/ ti ... • m W I I � I� W� I LL t. ® a •T ---------- q ! _ - LL w y o W{ i LI I I .'1 I 13 - .. t --.l _L«_ w_3T-9•---- — Wify M APPROACH w EXHIBIT H 11 _�== and a�veiHDav JPage 452 ZA W '. 1 :R� -..9-.Z:-'.f ^+- � I � -• --y _ �; -fir - "' m •I o \ 1 4 ,-a� ,I I yvl Ii n� oa .,9•.9 �,.o .��_ r � I II II 4, 1 o r• ®' � •,Im� p� y i ZZ 5s L .ZZ S ,Sl—i—h—.A-.RL A .9Z I . . r ---------- ^1 o ------------- a ------------- ZL a ,•l •LL/ ti ... • m W I I � I� W� I LL t. ® a •T ---------- q ! _ - LL w y o W{ i LI I I .'1 I 13 - .. t --.l _L«_ w_3T-9•---- — Wify M APPROACH w EXHIBIT H 11 _�== and a�veiHDav JPage 452 i33.rk+•Lr.11iHe n3tlWr r.J+ �xill'Hx0) S?' W:wl w{3tl y'tS'r'1 wO L:tl+aiea lx. Hn)00 s n r•: C1;: 7 -1014 1i1: G lwjin" L3& HSVMdV) (NJ OOV CNV SMMAONdWI 13! 3Ov8Ddf1 k,+ I L7ali$ 'sle}4 t a s O() A F■r T EXHIBIT E1 --E6 Pg27 J Page 453 Page 454 25'-3' _ _ YT$ OT OF TOU_NEOWER111W[R�TOP OF (ARSlASl1+1!t P OF PARAPipPF PAR r.v 02 u h�rr_r' ^, N CLEARANCE rF �tiJ e � Poi' WSKFtOOR FIRISHFLTOR� 6T I FIWSHFLOOR`f � 3Y•4" _— F,1 SOUTH ELEVATION WI�Tl 2 a 23'-6" _DF 2S'-2' TOP OF TOTER 2� 3 TOP OF IflWER L n a n iO-� p LOWER 10WER F� pP OF (ARWASH s L'"r w i7 8 w ehl TOP OF PARAPET w 17' 66 ❑ ❑ ❑ El El a ' Tl OP QF PoAPE[ F� LEAWI q p, -p, l'FWISH F100R �— _ i r _ _ • SP -3' s r "" [ [ '—x 16' r " I ' '"w"' `OOR _ FLOOR FINISH FLOOR AST ELEVATIONO''ELEVATION 3/ 3 E croj FOOD STORE AND CARWASH ELEVATIONS LEGEND LEGEND Gasolmr- MARK MATERIALS MARK MATERIALS MARK COLORS MARK COLORS Retail Ol STUCCO 8 ALUM SLATS �A LIGHT BEIGE X-55 FRENCH VANILLA (BASE 100) H I PAINT TO MATCH Facllllrr- Consulter 2 STONE VENEER 9 SHADE STRUCTURE © MEDIUM BEIGE X-82 HACIENDA (BASE 2001 ❑I ACCENT COLOR FM s7w AIL, 3� CLAY TILE 1D CONTROL JOINT © DARK BEIGE X-524 ALAMO (BASE 209) J WHITE [eevAP1 ILIY.I 20. M1201 4 ALUM STOREFRONT 11 CMIT TFRRA COTTA PMS:- 1675 K' LIGHT GREY °'^- +a x.ti 444 SO GLAZING Q SPANDREL GLASS C CLEAR ANODIZED 0 LIGHT STAIN © TGN 1 GREEN SCREEN [fl CLEAR/ SUNFILTER STONE VENEER/LIGHT BROWN PMS - 435 m T METAL FLASHING 14 WOOD TRELLIS G PER FRANCHISE TRADE DRESS I "- A-201 Page 454 ARC HIT EZ7 URAi AREP17111U�?Aj TREATMENT fREATMENI Ll Chevron r ChevMnj--,, ,KVRGN TRADE DRESS o- SDUTH FLFVA I ION (NORTH SIMIAM W F S I FL VAT;l ON lFASIJT SIMILAR) ARC HITE( f LIRAJ I Ri A "Mr. N 7 7 TOP OF STPUCRJF" I m rn /n/m W_ U_FARAN, TRADE NESS CANOPY FLFVATIGNI-� <34 AND SEETION CANOPY SFETIDN FINISH Fl -0(]I? i4 I LGLNU J LEGEND MARK MATERIALS MARK MATERIALS MARK LOLORS MARK O STucco 9 GUTTER f A VIHIT'r TERRA COTTA METAL FLASHING DOWNSPOUT B LIbl­17 BFIDF 1 YELLOW 'AW AALUM SERM 11 AWNINGMEDIUMBEly > EC RiVER ROCK 1 OMIT [p] Omil GLAZING UREEN SCREEN jjE] ILFAR 51_,%-S ALUMINUM STOREFRONT Q aml I L rA R ANODIZED O SIGN CONTROL JOINT -1 G G L PAINT TO MATCH A- <3> WALL WASHf.R LIGHT C6> , TIFF ROOFpl- DH ER FRANCHISE TRADF, DRESS Page 455 Z:) U z LLI Q z 0 a m U m C=J U M (If O Q = U EXHIBIT J F p y 3 yyY YY �a�Y Irk II II m — — — — — — — 13 Irk II II m — — — — — — — �W 0a U � z x F pp �i lv m -----�j iaxo<< W 1 V Imxx war II �t I a 13 Irk II II — — — — — — — �i y I II I 11 I I I II II — — — y.w� I I LI II I II I I -----�j iaxo<< W 1 V Imxx war II I -s'10 anal vwtw �a,ev y vt es.su I sz Er A.ii i 14 lif I I 'II a it II 11 I AY! 3nma&v mveiHo s e E1—E6 Pg30 I � YVI3G � b Tq n YT Page 456 y � n d �l z o 2 C9 a aah sg - � e $ a F �'�rs � d z anwrr mrew 9� ���afi9y a F- O w ly 8c S tl �� g#fi gRAI 1� 99a 9- c p - °° Z C� j� -jig C7 _J Q Z z Q W tsg$ 3` Bi 8 L�Ye e 1II111���'r 1B� G U O of .� Xg i s t $ Xa�� s rL a 6 w m" 4'. g h a��a ! n- La} a. Pu ki a' ¢ = O to �3 yiLs — b r; a&€ 5 r n U ma:m'��• e W o O V) 00 Elf EL e Mill 1915 8 T- N $ 15 ;Wel ���� � �� flip � IF �� . � tit '{ QIP u a w al �rr., 5� nS O r �I �7 I IS �-ja b �a II L I W L 1 !I I m 4 i a� Atli b'bi sml � z J a > Q U' R r 'g �ti Q e z gR tfe a p of W ~ Q Y U a a °r EMU m [if --- T AYNYM llLOtld -�9 �__ -I � Y 1 E9'SGI Ix � e r�f01F,Y ------J t del � ,� � `7 � I• �`• 1- EXHIBIT K Nvgy d A�NtlO b 3rIN3AV fJlV81HOHV E1 -E6 Pg31 n uw.�ll II I� Y '{ QIP �s j 6§j,rl i_I it Inii it e� �� O r ZmZ7 �7 I IS II L I W L 1 !I EXHIBIT K Nvgy d A�NtlO b 3rIN3AV fJlV81HOHV E1 -E6 Pg31 n uw.�ll II I� Y '{ QIP k� j 6§j,rl i_I it Inii y �el �W a 3M i� X31------�•---- I EXHIBIT K Nvgy d A�NtlO b 3rIN3AV fJlV81HOHV E1 -E6 Pg31 b I: aun3l ��I ��#�:• �� • YOYb Yanua, a - C Page 457 n uw.�ll II '{ QIP k� j 6§j,rl i_I it Inii y �el �W a 3M i� b I: aun3l ��I ��#�:• �� • YOYb Yanua, a - C Page 457 Vkw 1 vr-)F-rx J 1. AV 1 r - f .VV r-.lyll. DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTION AGENDA RAINS ROOM CITU HALL 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE A. CALL TO ORDER Roll Call: Ray Wimberly 7.00 P.M. Rich Macias '�. Candyce Burnett Donald Granger Alternates: Lou Munoz Rich Fletcher Francisco Oaxaca X Additional Staff Present: Mike Smith, Senior Planner and Tom Grahn, Associate Planner B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS None This is the time and place for the general public to address the Committee on any item listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Committee from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Committee may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Staff Coordinator, depending upon the number of individuals embers of the audience. This is a professional businessmeeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. C. PROJECT REVIEW ITEMS The following items will be presented by the applicant and/or their representatives. Each presentation and resulting period of Committee comment is limited to 20 minutes. Following each presentation, the Committee will address major issues and make recommendations with respect to the project proposal. The Design Review Committee acts as an advisory Committee to the Planning Commission. Their recommendations will be forwarded to the Planning Commission as applicable. The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Committee may open the meeting for public input. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW ORC2015-00682 - ARCHIBALD OIL - A request to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re-establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 EXHIBIT L E1—E6 Pg32 Page 458 V V 1 W U " M V 1 I Am 1 I — I. V V r. 1Y1 . DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTION AGENDA RAINS ROOM CITY HALL 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE square foot car wash on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low -Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue; APN: 0208-291-05. Related files: General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015- 00684, Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-00681, and Variance DRC2016-00831, The Committee approved the project as presented and recommended that the project move forward to the Planning Commission for final review. D. ADJOURNMENT 7:15 P. M. The Design Review Committee has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11:00 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Committee. I, Jennifer Palacios, Office Specialist 11 with the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on day, Thursday, October 24, 2017, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA. Jennifer Palacios Office Specialist II City of Rancho Cucamonga If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. E1—E5 Pg33 Page 459 DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:00 p.m. Tom Grahn October 31, 2017 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2015-00682 - ARCHIBALD OIL - A request to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re-establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 square foot car wash on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low -Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue; APN: 0208-291-05. Related files: General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684, Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-00681, and Variance DRC2016-00831. General: The project site is a square shaped parcel of 29,456 square feet (0.676 acre) with dimensions of about 174 feet (east to west) and 180 feet (north to south) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. The site is fully improved with a 1,728 square foot service station building and 1,481 square foot fuel canopy. Landscape areas are provided along both street frontages, and additional landscaped areas are located at the northwest and southeast corners of the site. Vehicle access is provided by two existing driveways along Archibald Avenue (at the northwest and southwest corners) and one existing driveway along Arrow Route (at the southeast corner). The property to the north of the site contains the Mulberry Early Education Center in the Low -Medium (LM) Residential District. Immediately to the south is Arrow Route and beyond that is a commercial center in the General Commercial (GC) District. The property to the east is vacant, and beyond that are properties developed with residential uses. These properties to the east are in the Low -Medium (LM) Residential District. To the west is Archibald Avenue, and beyond that is vacant land in the Office -Professional (OP). District. The application proposes to utilize the existing service station building for retail food sales, reuse the existing fuel canopy, and construct a new 968 square foot carwash at the southeast corner of the service station building. The project will retain the existing driveway at the northwest corner of the site, close the existing driveway at the southwest corner of the site, and relocate the existing driveway at the southeast corner of the site to a new shared driveway for the project site and the vacant property to the east; both driveways will be provided with decorative paving. Asphalt paving covers most of the site, with no identified parking spaces on-site; however, site improvements include the installation of landscape planters along the entire north and east property lines, and the striping of 7 parking spaces. Parking for the project site is based on a summation of parking requirements for the retail, fuel sales, and car wash land uses. Based upon these requirements a total of 8 parking spaces are required. Due to site constraints, only 7 parking spaces are provided. The applicant will be submitting a Minor Exception application to address this discrepancy. The existing trash enclosure will be relocated to the northeast corner of the project site. Project circulation will provide for two-way access from each driveway to the food store and fuel canopy. Due to site constraints, only one-way access will be allowed around the north side of the food store, to the carwash, and exiting to Arrow Route. The existing service station building is constructed out of tan brick and terra cotta roof tiles and the fuel canopy is constructed out of metal posts and terra cotta roof tiles. The applicant proposes a complete redesign of project architecture for the existing service station and fuel canopy buildings. Proposed architecture for the service station, carwash, and fuel canopy is for a contemporary commercial structure utilizing common materials and finishes. The exterior of the service station/carwash building proposes to use a mixture of earth tone colored stucco and stone E1 --E6 Pg34 Page 460 DRC COMMENTS DRC2015-00682—ARCHIBALD OIL October 31, 2017 Page 2 veneer wainscoting as well as additional architectural elements including tower elements, roof tiles, exposed rafter tails, aluminum store front windows, and green screen, all to add visual interest to the building design. The exterior of the fuel canopy building proposes the installation of river rock wainscot at the base of the structure and the installation of panels at the terra cotta roof for tenant signage. Related Applications: Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-00681 was submitted to re-establish the service station land use and establish the car wash land use. Variance DRC2016-00831 was submitted to reduce the parking setback along the streets. In order to allow for a reduction in the number of on-site parking spaces associated with the reuse of a vacant service station, the applicant will need to submit a Minor Exception application. The General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 were submitted to change the General Plan designation and Zoning District for the project site, and the adjacent parcel to the east, from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial, and Low Medium (LM) Residential District to General Commercial (GC) District, respectively. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Major Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project. Staff supports the proposed site layout and overall design of the proposed project. The building itself consists of visually -interesting fagades which meet the City's 360 -degree design standards. The building facade incorporates a variety of materials, including stucco finish, stone veneer wainscott, stone, glass store front windows, and aluminum awnings, and incorporates all of the City's design standards for commercial development. 2. Remove the architectural treatment/signage on the fuel canopy and retain the existing terra cotta roof tiles. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues. There are no secondary design issues. Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion. All Double Detector Checks (DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC),required and/or proposed shall be installed at locations that are not within direct view or line -of - sight of the main entrance. The specific locations of each DDC and FDC shall require the review and approval of the Planning Department and Fire Construction Services/Fire Department. All DDC and FDC shall be screened behind a 4 -foot high block wall and appropriate landscaping. These walls shall be constructed of similar material used on-site .to match the building. 2. All ground -mounted equipment, including utility boxes, transformers, and back-flow devices, shall be surrounded by a minimum of two rows of shrubs spaced a minimum of 18 inches on -center. All ground -mounted equipment shall be painted dark green except as directed otherwise by the Fire Department. E1—E6 Pg35 Page 461 DRC COMMENTS DRC2015-00682 - ARCHIBALD OIL October 31, 2017 Page 2 3. The number of signs shown on the conceptual elevations exceeds what is permitted by Development Code Table 17.74.080-1, and will be subject to approval of a Sign Permit, 4. Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock. Other stone veneers may be manufactured products. Staff Recommendation: Design Review Committee Action: The Committee approved the project as presented and recommended that the project move forward to the Planning Commission for final review. Staff Planner: Tom Grahn, Associate Planner Members Present: Coin missione r, Ray Wimberly; Commissioner, Francisco Oaxaca; Mike Smith, Senior Planner (substituting for Senior Planner, Donald Granger) Additional Staff Present: E1 -E6 Pg36 Page 462 • F:• h' Vis'. s City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Mitigated Negative Declaration is being circulated forpublic review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015- 00684, Design Review DRC2015-00682, Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-00681, Variance DRC2016-00831, and Minor Exception DRC2017-00879. Public Review Period Closes: June 13, 2018 Project Name: Archibald Oil Project Applicant: Benny Natanzi Archibald Oil 18500 Ventura Boulevard Tarzana, CA 91356 Project Location (also see attached map): Located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route—APN's: 0208-291-05.and 0208-291-06. Project Description: The project involves a proposal to amend the General Plan land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and to amend the Zoning Map land use district from the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the General Commercial (GC) District for 2 parcels with a combined area of 1.22 acres located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. The applicant also proposes to re-establish the operation (including retail sales) of an existing vacant/inactive service station that consists of a 1,728 -square foot service station building, a 1,481 -square foot fuel pump canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and to construct a 968 - square foot car wash on APN: 0208-29-05. There is no proposal for development of APN: 0208-291- -06 associated with this orciect. FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Mitigated Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: The Initial Study indicates that with mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. If adopted, the Mitigated Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Reportwill not be required. The factual and analytical basis for this finding is included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax 909 477-284.7. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Mitigated. Negative Declaration during the review period. June 13,_2018 Date of Determination EXHIBIT M Adopted By E1—E6 Pg37 Page 463 ��9 R _ Jrl 7" �t2' � 1 /.. a `i • ; a +� � •�':'�- .�,��. �. ;.sem e ref I ; 1 f i 14.[� • �- - ►�- 1 j - 71 d6 iji ILICIN IX JL �ra - � r.... � . r i ..ti,+a+r, . w,w-++-r�..w.�w —_ �.a _ — _ _ r. r.�w � ......� ..� ...... � �.-. w.. �yr-_ _ . �. ..,.,� A, ii� •- _ "'' r t •'C �' !r R .......`.•alben{yyWll��'AL\".A��,'ti-sw+f�►- +. M" V i 0 ;P,.AhMM ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM CONGA (Part I - Initial Study) Please Planning Dep&finenf { "8 or print Clearly using Jnk. Else th■tab key 10 move from ona Jing fu the next line.) (GM) 477-2750 The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed F project to thatthe City may review the project'pursuant to City.Policles, Ordlnances, and Guidelines; the California Eni►lronmentab: Quality Act;- and the Clty's Rules and Procedures to- Implement CEQA. It is Important that the information requested In this application be provided In full: uport review of.the completed Initial Study ParH and the development,appilcatlon, acid'itlanai inforinafion such as, but not;iimited to, tiaffic, noise, biofoglcal, drair�aga; and geolo lcai reports ;may be _i`equired. Thp projectappitcatian will riot E deemed complete unless f} erid6htifIt d special studlesfre.por ft—are subml 'd for revi9W and accepted as complete and ade9uate. Thi project application will not be scheduled for Committe6s`- review unless ail. feoulred. reports-• are submitted and "dee M-- complete tcf staff to pi.G*elha'itiltial'Study Part it as required by CEQA . In'additlon to the filing,fee, the appiicant:wiil be.iesponsibiia to pay or reimburse t6 City; Ifs agents; officers,.andlor corasuitarits' for 'alt costs for :i. o; pparatian, teview;` analysis; recommendations, mitigations, etc., ofanispfi lw studies or ceparts:' ' rrY�_�rNJ�tc c Arr�r4A r rulYJ vvlt 1. NOT 8EPRt]Gt:SSED. Please note thatit is the responsibilityof the applicant to ensure that the spplleatlon 1s complete at the time of submittal; Gty staff w171 not be available to parform work required to provide missing Information. Application Number for the project to which this form pertains: Address . . ' ` . .a ��_� !i t w r fts 1 �■ � r � � Name B address Of developer or project sponsor.] 3 477 /-)-PC" BIkL12—AVE G Updated 920/2012 Page 1 of 10 EXHIBIT N E I -E6 Pg39 Page 465 Contact Person & Address: V -14P- D V X—r Name & Address ofperson preparing this form (if different from above): Telephone Number. 3 to— 9 3 -tO 6 i 2 Information indicated by an asterisk O is not required of non -construction CUP's unless otherwise requested by staff. 'i) Provide a full scale (8-112 x 11) copy of the USGS Quadrant Shaef(s) which Includes the project site, and indicate the site' boundaries. 2) Provide a set of color photographs that show representative views into the site from the north, south, east, and west, views Into and from the site from the primary access points that serve the site; and representative views of signipcant features from the site. Include a map showing location of each photograph. 3) Project Location (describe): 4) Assessor's Parcel Numbers (attach additional sheet if necessary): 2OS 2 OS_ o o I 'S) Gross Site Area (aclsq. ft.): e3 6CO - '6) Net Site Area (total site size minus area of public streets & proposed dedications): 30d000 SO-. T: 7) Describe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change which would affect the project site (attach additional sheet if necessary): 1 Updated 9120=12 Page 2 of 10 E1 --E6 Pg40 Page 466 LVf3d 93—L3 a � to a 86Ed nouOrra aaiepdn :(10019114 ]a* pue svGdalpegsllgnd.'sjJoo17 uoyeuLqul jo saalnos pe opj ells oql Jo sloodse lsgpolsly.IOIpua lejnllna Umousl eyl egyoseCI (ot IN V :(selpnls DLyell 'srfauns leal6oloaya�e pue allorq 'selpnls af6olo�p�[ylo7pueleal$oloe8 ''a !) uoyeul�o�ul�o sa�nos lle ells 'mv!ppe ul pagp=Eop sarnleaj luea9u4ts jo syder6oloyd yaepy 'seinlaruls ayllo asn a yl pue (uoprpuoo pue e6e 6ulpnlou)i ells uo samlon ys 6ullslxe .fue equasoo spadse alueos pue 'sasmoo o6eulelp 'speou pue sl�e11 'sG94 einlew 'slewp? pue shield 'Cilllge7s llos '�Sydel6odol uo uapewJo1ul 6urpnlaullae(o�d eyl e�olaq slslxa 11 se alts Byl fo 6ulllas leals.Syd ey1 eglnsad (B 'loejald ayl lugweldu lIlin1 ofiepto ulsolouB6e lalueuuuano6leylo pue e6ucxuean� oyoue�l�o �ilr� ayl u1o„y,i�esseaeu sg 11lM yaryna slluuedllelo uopdpasep a epnloul (8 Page 467 11) Describe anynolse sources andtheirlevels that now affect the site (aircraft, roadway noise, ata) and how they Wit effect proposed uses: No • U, 12) Describe the proposed protect In detail. This should provide an adequate description ofthe site in terms of uttlrnate use that will result from the proposed project. Indicate if there are proposed phases for development, the extent of development to occur with each phase, and the anticipated compieflon of each Increment. Attach addillonal shest(s) if necessary: tr . WO a iii' •• L ��' U 4 ; 1 i■ fir+ 13) Describe the surrounding pmopertles, Including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects indicate the type ofland use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensilyofiand use (one-kt*, epariment houses, shops, department stores, etc.) end scale of development (height, frontage, setback, rear yard, etc.): :Sr RN PROPER r nAPT K wf?9 rJe :C SV . 21a /VG f1C Pi N(a S L -V le, T! 5 S'C N� r ISLL6ST R Y P,,rJI� 14) Will the proposed project change the pattern, scala, or character of the surrounding general Brea of the projecti f j updated 912MO12 Page 4 of 10 L�lvb SCEP! El—E6 Pg42 Page 468 15) Indicate the type of short-term and tong -term noise to be generated, Including source and amount. Now will these nolse levels affect adjacent properties and on-site uses? What methods of soundproofing are proposed? r1 Ii *16) Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenic trees: l+iD IT- rrC" 17) Indicate any bodies of water (including domestic water supplies) into which the site drains; E -C-- 1�--I 'C—U 18) Indicate expected amount of water usage. (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification, please contact the Cucamonga Valley Water District at (909),987-25,91. a. Residential (gailday) Peak use (gatoay) b. Commercialllnd. (galldaylsc) 3 . G Peak use (gallminlac) 19) Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal. ❑ Septic Tank Sewer, If septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests. If discharge to a sanitary sewage system is proposed indicate expected daily sewage generation:(See AtlachmentAforusageestimatas). Forfurtherclariiicalion,please contact the Cucamonga Valley Water District at (909) 987-2591. s. Resldantlal (gailday) A � b. CommerciallIndustrlal (gallday/ac) WA RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20) !Number of residential units: Detached (Indicate range afpercel sizes, minimum lot size and maximum lot size: Updated 9120r-012 Page 5of10 E1 --E6 Pg43 Page 469 Attached (indicate whether units are rental or for sale units): 21) Anticipated range of sale prices and/or rents: Sale Price(s) S. to $ Rent (per month) $ to $ NIA 22) Specify number of bedrooms by unit type: / 23) Indicate anticipated household size by unit type: 24) Indicate the expected number of school children who will be residing within the project: Contact the appropriate School Districts as shown in Attachment B: a. Elementary: b. Junlor Nigh: c. Senior High COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL., AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Describe type of use(s) and majorfunction(s) of commercial, Industrial or instil ilional uses: �r r I ► "111- MawAWNWIFAMM's —M 26) Total floor area of commercial, industrial, cr institutional uses by type: a �` * ~ Kat • t♦ 11 - s r Updated 9120M12 Page 6 at 10 E1—E6 Pg44 Page 470 27) lndicata hours or oparation: - 28) Number of employees: - Total: Maximum Shif: Tme of Maximum Shift: { 29) Provide breakdown of anticipated job classifications, including wage and salary ranges, as well as an indication of the rate of hire for each classification (attach additional shsel if necessary): 30) Estlmaflon of the number of workers to be hired that currently reside in the Clty: *3 1) For commercial and industrial uses only, indicate the source, type, and amount of Bir pollution emissions. (data should be verified through the South Coast Air Quality Managemant District, at (3f 8) 572.6283): ALL PROJECTS 32) Have the sealer, sewer, fire, and flood control agencies serving the project been contacted to determine their ability to provide adequate service to the proposed project? ff so, please indicate their response. 33) to the known history of this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous andlor toxic materials? .Examples of hazardous and/or toxic materials include, but are not limited to PCB's; radioactive substances; pesticides and harblcides; fuels, oils, solvents, and other flammable liquids and gases. Also note undarground storage of any of the above. Please fist the materials and describe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as wall as the dates of use, it known. Updated 912p12012 Paga 7 of 10 El —E6 Pg45 Page 471 34) Will the proposedproject'involvethe temporary orlong-term use,storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials, including but not limited to those examples listed above? if yes, provide an inventory of all such materials to be used and proposed method of disposal. The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the application plans, 35) The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fee. The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of Me Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning CommisstonlPlanning Director hearing: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for adequate evaluation of.this project to the besl ofmyability, thatlhe facts, statements, and Information presented are true and correct tot he best of my knowledge and belief. t further understand that additional information maybe required to be submitted before an adequate avatuation can be made by the City oFRancho Cucamonga. Dale: Signature: ti Title: Updated 912012012 Page 6 of 10 E1 --E6 Pg46 Page 472 ATTACHMENT "A" CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTIMATED WATER USE AND SEWER FLOWS FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT (Data Provided by Cucamonga Valley Water District February 2003) Water Usage Single -Family Multi -Family Neighborhood Commercial General Commercial Office Professional Institutional/Government Industrial Park Large General Industrial Heavy Industrial (distribution) Sewer Flows Single-Famlly Multi -Family General Commercial Office Professional Industrial Park Large General Industrial Heavy Industrial (distribution) 705 gallons per EDU per day 256 gallons per EDU per day 1000 galldaylunit (tenant) 4082 gal/day/unit (tenant) 973 galldaylunit (tenant) 6412 gaVdaylunit (tenant) 1750 gal/day/unit (tenant) 2020 gal/day/unit (tenant) 1863 gal/day/unit (tenant) 270 gallons per EDU per day 190 gallons per EDU per day 1900 gal/day/acre 1900 gal/daylacre Institutional/Government 3000 gal/day/acre 2020 gal/day/afire 1863 gal/day/acre Source: Cucamonga Valley Water District Engineering & Water Resources Departments, Urban Water Management Plan 2000 Updaled 912012012 Page 9 of 10 E1—E6 Pg47 Page 473 ATTACHMENT B Contact the school district for your area For amount and payment of school fees: Elementary School Districts Alta Loma 9350 Base Line Road, Suite F Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)987-0766 Central 10601 Church Street, Suite 112 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)989-8541 Cucamonga 8776 Archibald Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)987-8942 Etiwanda 6061 East Avenue P.O. Box 248 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 (909) 899-2451 High School Chaffey High School 211 West 5th Street Ontario, CA 91762 (909) 988-8511 Updated 9120!2012 Page 10 of 18 El -E6 Pg48 Page 474 "--.M rkfel 0611Hh City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II 1. Project File: General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015- 00684, Design Review DRC2015-00682, Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-00681, Variance DRC2016-00831, and Minor Exception DRC2017-00879. 2. Related Files: None. 3. Description of Project: The applicant, Archibald Oil, proposes to amend the General Plan land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and to amend the Zoning Map land use district from the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the General Commercial (GC) District for 2 parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) with a combined area of 1.22 acres located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. The applicant also proposes to re-establish the operation (including retail sales) of an existing vacant/inactive service station that consists of a 1,728 -square foot service station building, a 1,481 -square foot fuel pump canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and to construct a 968 -square foot car wash on APN: 0208-291-05. There is no proposal for development of APN: 0208-291-06 associated with this project. 4. Project Sponsor Name and Address: Benny Natanzi Archibald Oil 18500 Ventura Boulevard Tarzana, CA 91356 General Plan Designation: Low Medium Residential (proposed change to General Commercial). Zoning: how Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed changed to General Commercial (GC) District). 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The project site consists of two parcels (APNs: 0208-291- 05 and 0208-291-06). APN: 0208-291-05 is a square shaped parcel of 29,456 square feet (0.70 acre) with dimensions of about 174 feet (east to west) and 180 feet (north to south) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. This parcel is fully improved with a 1,728 - square foot service station building and 1,481 -square foot fuel pump canopy. Landscape areas are provided along both street frontages, and additional landscaped areas are located at the northwest and southeast corners of the site. Vehicle access is provided by two existing driveways along Archibald Avenue (at the northwest and southwest corners) and one existing driveway along Arrow Route (at the southeast corner). The adjacent 0.52 -acre parcel (APN: 0208-291-05) to the east of the service station parcel is vacant. This parcel has dimensions of about 137 feet (east to west and 180 feet (north to south). The property to the north of the site contains the Mulberry Early Education Center in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District. Immediately to the south is Arrow Route and beyond that is a commercial center in the General Commercial (GC) District. The property to the east is developed with residential uses and located in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District. To the west is Archibald Avenue, and beyond that is vacant land in the Office Professional (OP) District. E1—E6 Pg49 Page 475 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 2 Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Contact Person and Phone Number: Tom Grahn, Associate Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department (909) 774-4312 10. Other agencies whose approval is required: None. GLOSSARY --The following abbreviations are used in this report: CALEEMOD — California Emissions Estimator Model CVWD — Cucamonga Valley Water District EIR — Environmental Impact Report FEIR — Final Environmental Impact Report FPEIR — Final Program Environmental Impact Report NPDES — National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NOx— Nitrogen Oxides ROG — Reactive Organic Gases PMio — Fine Particulate Matter RWQCB — Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD — South Coast Air Quality Management District SWPPP -- Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than -Significant -Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. {✓) Aesthetics ( } Agricultural Resources (✓) Air Quality (✓) Biological Resources {✓) Cultural Resources (✓) Geology & Soils (✓) Greenhouse Gas Emissions { ) Hazards & Waste Materials {✓) Hydrology & Water Quality ( ) Land Use & Planning ( ) Mineral Resources (✓) Noise ( }Population & Housing ( } Public Services { ) Recreation ( ) TransportationfTraffic (✓) Tribal Cultural Resources ( ) Utilities & Service Systems {✓) Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: ( ) I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. (✓) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by, or agreed to, by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. Rev 4-17 E1 --E6 Pg50 Page 476 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 3 ( ) I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ( ) I find that the proposed project MAY have a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standard and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. ( ) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR AT1VE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are impos n the o sed project, nothing further is required. 10 Prepared By: Date: Reviewed By: Date: Rev 4-17 E1—E6 Pg51 Page 477 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 4 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project: Less Than a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? O Significant Less (✓) Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially significant With Mitigation Than Significant No not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic Impact Incorporated Impact Impact EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? O O O (✓) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but () () () (✓) not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway? C) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or () () () (✓) quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, which () () (✓) ( ) would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Comments: a) As identified in the General Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR), the City sits at the southern base of the San Gabriel Mountains, at the eastern end of its range. The San Bernardino Mountains are just east of the San Gabriel Mountains, divided by the Cajon Pass. Views of the San Gabriel and San Bernardino Mountains are visible from the project site. According to Figure LLL -6 of the General Plan, Archibald Avenue is designated as a view corridor as it as it traverses across the City from North to South. The proposed development project on APN: 0208-291-05 is directly adjacent to Archibald Avenue, a Major Arterial (Figure CM 2) and Special Boulevard (Figure LU -6). The General Plan identifies that a Special Boulevard is characterized by landscaping, hardscaping, and meandering sidewalks. Project improvements would include maintaining existing landscaping (providing additional as necessary) and maintaining the existing curb adjacent sidewalk Archibald Avenue, these improvements support the Special Boulevard designation. Mature heritage trees existing on-site are discussed in the Section 4e under Biological Resources below. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to a scenic vista caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. b) The project site contains no scenic resources and no historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway. There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 4-17 General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-OD684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When E 1—E6 Pg 52 Page 478 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 5 applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the!City, the impact (if any) to scenic resources caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. C) The project site (APN: 0208-291-05) is a square shaped parcel of 29,456 square feet (0.70 acre) with dimensions of about 174 feet (east to west) and 180 feet (north to south) located at the northeast cornet of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. The site is fully improved with a 1,728 -square foot service station building and 1,481 square foot fuel canopy. Landscape areas are provided along both street frontages, and additional landscaped areas are located at the northwest and southeast corners of the site. Vehicle access is provided by two existing driveways along Archibald Avenue (at the northwest and southwest corners) and one existing driveway along Arrow Route (at the southeast corner). Overall, the project site is located within an in -fill commercial and residential area and staff has determined the proposed site improvements will be compatible with surrounding environment. The Design Review Committee has reviewed the project and agrees with staff that the proposed building will not degrade the visual character of the surrounding environment. City standards require the developer to underground existing and new utility lines and facilities to minimize the unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No. 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels .(APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to the visual character or quality caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. d) The project site is located in an area that is subject to nighttime lighting from surrounding commercial and residential uses and street fighting along Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Additionally, development of the project site would increase the number of streetlights and security lighting used iin the immediate vicinity. The design and placement of light fixtures require compliance with City standards that require shielding, diffusing, or indirect lighting to avoid glare. On-site illumination levels (provided for street lighting, parking, circulation, and pedestrian areas) will comply with Development Code standards and will be shielded from adjacent properties. Lighting will be selected and located to confine the area of illumination to within the project site. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 4-17 General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to substantial light and glare caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable.mitigation measures will be implemented. E1 --E6 Pg53 Page 479 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the!City, the impact (if any) to scenic resources caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. C) The project site (APN: 0208-291-05) is a square shaped parcel of 29,456 square feet (0.70 acre) with dimensions of about 174 feet (east to west) and 180 feet (north to south) located at the northeast cornet of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. The site is fully improved with a 1,728 -square foot service station building and 1,481 square foot fuel canopy. Landscape areas are provided along both street frontages, and additional landscaped areas are located at the northwest and southeast corners of the site. Vehicle access is provided by two existing driveways along Archibald Avenue (at the northwest and southwest corners) and one existing driveway along Arrow Route (at the southeast corner). Overall, the project site is located within an in -fill commercial and residential area and staff has determined the proposed site improvements will be compatible with surrounding environment. The Design Review Committee has reviewed the project and agrees with staff that the proposed building will not degrade the visual character of the surrounding environment. City standards require the developer to underground existing and new utility lines and facilities to minimize the unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No. 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels .(APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to the visual character or quality caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. d) The project site is located in an area that is subject to nighttime lighting from surrounding commercial and residential uses and street fighting along Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Additionally, development of the project site would increase the number of streetlights and security lighting used iin the immediate vicinity. The design and placement of light fixtures require compliance with City standards that require shielding, diffusing, or indirect lighting to avoid glare. On-site illumination levels (provided for street lighting, parking, circulation, and pedestrian areas) will comply with Development Code standards and will be shielded from adjacent properties. Lighting will be selected and located to confine the area of illumination to within the project site. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 4-17 General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to substantial light and glare caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable.mitigation measures will be implemented. E1 --E6 Pg53 Page 479 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 6 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project. Less Than • () Significant Less (✓) Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially significant with WitigalJon Than Significant No shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Impact Incorporated Im act Impact 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project. a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or () () () (✓) Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a () (} () (✓} Williamson Act contract? C) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause re -zoning of, () () () (✓) forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220 '(g), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code Section 51104 (g))? d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest O {) {) (✓) land to non -forest use? e) Involve other changes in the existing environment, O (} O (✓) which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non -forest -use? Comments: a) The project site and adjacent vacant parcel is not designated as Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance. The proposed project site is located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route on a fully developed site that was previously used as a service station. The project proposes to amend the General Plan land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and to amend the Zoning Map land use district from the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the General Commercial (GC) District for a 1.22 acre 2 -parcel site at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route and to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re-establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a'968 square foot car wash on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue. The project site is characterized by the Mulberry Early Education Center in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the north, a commercial center in the General Commercial (GC) District to the south, residential uses in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the east, and vacant land in the Office -Professional (OP) District to the west. There are approximately 209 acres of Farmland of Local Importance, Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga according to the General Plan and the California Department of Conservation Farmland Map 2010. Concentrations of Important Farmland are sparsely located in the southern and eastern parts of the City that is characterized by existing and planned development. Farmland in the southern portion of the City is characterized by industrial, residential, and commercial land uses and ,f=armland in the eastern portion of the City is within the Etiwanda area and planned for development. Further, a large number of the designated farmland parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic viability is doubtful; therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan. The General Plan FPEIR identified the conversion of Rev 4-17 E1—E6 Pg54 Page 480 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 7 farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. There are no Williamson Act contracts within the City. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. C) There are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga zoned as forest land or timberland. Therefore, no impacts would occur related to the conversion of forest land to non -forest use. Further, there are no areas within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that are zoned as forest land, timberland, or Timberland Production. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. d) There are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that qualify as forest land or timberland. Therefore, no impacts would occur related to the loss or conversion of forest land to non -forest use. Further, there are no areas within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that are zoned as forest land, timberland, orTimberland Production. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. e) The project site is located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District is characterized by the Mulberry Early Education Center in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the north, a commercial center in the General Commercial (GC) District to the south, residential uses in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the east, and vacant land in the Office -Professional (OP) District to the west. The project site contains and existing service station building and pump canopy and is not being utilized as Farmland or zone for agricultural uses. The proposed project would not result in the conversion of land from Farmland to a non-agricultural land use. Furthermore, there are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that qualify as forest land and therefore, there is no potential for conversion of forest land to a non -forest use. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 3. AIR QUALITY. Would the project.- rojecta) Less Than a)Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the () Significant less (✓) Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially slgnif<cant With Mitigation Than Significant No b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute Impact Incorporated Impact Impart farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. There are no Williamson Act contracts within the City. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. C) There are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga zoned as forest land or timberland. Therefore, no impacts would occur related to the conversion of forest land to non -forest use. Further, there are no areas within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that are zoned as forest land, timberland, or Timberland Production. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. d) There are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that qualify as forest land or timberland. Therefore, no impacts would occur related to the loss or conversion of forest land to non -forest use. Further, there are no areas within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that are zoned as forest land, timberland, orTimberland Production. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. e) The project site is located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District is characterized by the Mulberry Early Education Center in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the north, a commercial center in the General Commercial (GC) District to the south, residential uses in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the east, and vacant land in the Office -Professional (OP) District to the west. The project site contains and existing service station building and pump canopy and is not being utilized as Farmland or zone for agricultural uses. The proposed project would not result in the conversion of land from Farmland to a non-agricultural land use. Furthermore, there are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that qualify as forest land and therefore, there is no potential for conversion of forest land to a non -forest use. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 3. AIR QUALITY. Would the project.- rojecta) a)Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the () () (} (✓) applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute () {✓} {) ( ) substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? C) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of () {✓) () ( ) any criteria pollutant for which the project.region is non - attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant O _ (✓) _ O ( ) concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial () () () (✓) number of people? Rev 4-17 E1 --E6 Pg55 Page 481 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 8 Comments: a) As discussed in subsection b, the project would not exceed any air quality standards and would not interfere with the region's ability to comply with Federal and State air quality standards for Criterion 1 Increase in the Frequency or Severity of Violations (local air quality impacts) or Criterion 2 Exceed Assumptions in the AQMP (consistency with the 2003 AQMP). Therefore, the project is consistent with the 2003 AQMP. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels i(APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to air quality caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. b) Both the State of California and the Federal government have established health -based ambient air quality standards (AAQS) for seven air pollutants. These pollutants include ozone (Os), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), coarse particulate matter with a diameter or 10 microns or less (PM,o), fine particulate matter less than 2.5 (PM2.5) microns in diameter and lead. Among these pollutants, ozone and particulate matter (PM,a and PM2.5) are considered regional pollutants while the others have more localized effects. In addition, the State of California has set standards for sulfates, hydrogen sulfide (1-12S), vinyl chloride and visibility reducing particles. These standards are designed to protect the health and welfare of the populace with a reasonable margin of safety. Rev 4-17 The City of Rancho Cucamonga area is within the South Coast Air Basin, which is under the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). The California Clean Air Act (CCAA) provides the SCAQMD with the authority to manage transportation activities at indirect sources. Indirect sources of pollution are generated when minor sources collectively emit a substantial amount of pollution. Examples of this include motor vehicles at an intersection, a mall and on highways. SCAQMD also regulates stationary sources of pollution within a jurisdictional area. Direct emissions from motor vehicles are regulated by the Air Resources Board (ARB). The combination of topography, low mixing height, abundant sunshine, and emissions from the second largest urban area in the United States gives the Basin the worst air pollution problem in the nation. The Basin experiences a persistent temperature inversion (increasing temperature with increasing altitude); this inversion (coupled with low wind speeds) limits the vertical dispersion of air contaminants, holding them relatively near the ground. Pursuant to the Federal Clean Air Act (FCAA) of 1970, the EPA established national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for six major pollutants, termed criteria pollutants: ozone (Oa), coarse particulate matter with a diameter or 10 microns or less (PM,o), fine particulate matter less than 2.5 (PM2.5) microns in diameter, carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), and lead. E 7 --E6 Pg56 Page 482 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting. Information Sources: Potentially significant With Mitigation Than significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Comments: a) As discussed in subsection b, the project would not exceed any air quality standards and would not interfere with the region's ability to comply with Federal and State air quality standards for Criterion 1 Increase in the Frequency or Severity of Violations (local air quality impacts) or Criterion 2 Exceed Assumptions in the AQMP (consistency with the 2003 AQMP). Therefore, the project is consistent with the 2003 AQMP. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels i(APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to air quality caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. b) Both the State of California and the Federal government have established health -based ambient air quality standards (AAQS) for seven air pollutants. These pollutants include ozone (Os), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), coarse particulate matter with a diameter or 10 microns or less (PM,o), fine particulate matter less than 2.5 (PM2.5) microns in diameter and lead. Among these pollutants, ozone and particulate matter (PM,a and PM2.5) are considered regional pollutants while the others have more localized effects. In addition, the State of California has set standards for sulfates, hydrogen sulfide (1-12S), vinyl chloride and visibility reducing particles. These standards are designed to protect the health and welfare of the populace with a reasonable margin of safety. Rev 4-17 The City of Rancho Cucamonga area is within the South Coast Air Basin, which is under the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). The California Clean Air Act (CCAA) provides the SCAQMD with the authority to manage transportation activities at indirect sources. Indirect sources of pollution are generated when minor sources collectively emit a substantial amount of pollution. Examples of this include motor vehicles at an intersection, a mall and on highways. SCAQMD also regulates stationary sources of pollution within a jurisdictional area. Direct emissions from motor vehicles are regulated by the Air Resources Board (ARB). The combination of topography, low mixing height, abundant sunshine, and emissions from the second largest urban area in the United States gives the Basin the worst air pollution problem in the nation. The Basin experiences a persistent temperature inversion (increasing temperature with increasing altitude); this inversion (coupled with low wind speeds) limits the vertical dispersion of air contaminants, holding them relatively near the ground. Pursuant to the Federal Clean Air Act (FCAA) of 1970, the EPA established national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for six major pollutants, termed criteria pollutants: ozone (Oa), coarse particulate matter with a diameter or 10 microns or less (PM,o), fine particulate matter less than 2.5 (PM2.5) microns in diameter, carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), and lead. E 7 --E6 Pg56 Page 482 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 9 Rev 4-17 Criteria pollutants are defined as those pollutants for which the Federal and State governments have established AAQS, or criteria, for outdoor concentrations in order to protect public health. Data collected at permanent monitoring stations are used by the EPA to classify regions as "attainment" or "non -attainment" depending on whether the regions met the requirements stated in the primary NAAQS. Nonattainment areas have additional restrictions as required by the EPA. The EPA has designated the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) as the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) responsible for ensuring the Basin's compliance with the FCAA. The South Coast Air Basin is in Non -Attainment Status for Ozone, PMzo and PM2.5. Specific criteria for determining whether the potential air quality impacts of a project are significant are set forth in the SCAQMD's CEQA Air Quality Handbook. The criteria include daily emissions thresholds, compliance with State and national air quality standards, and consistency with the current AQMP. As prescribed by SCAQMD, an Air Quality & Climate Change Assessment (MIG Hogle-Ireland, August 2016) was prepared that utilizes CaIEEMod (Version 2013.2.2) to evaluate short-term construction emissions and short- term construction emissions for localized significant thresholds, long-term operational emissions, operation emissions for localized significant thresholds, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Short Term (Construction): Project Emissions and Impacts The project proposes to amend the General Plan land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and to amend the Zoning Map land use district from the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the General Commercial (GC) District for a 1.22 acre 2 -parcel site at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re- establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 square foot car wash on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue. The potential emissions associated with construction of the project are described in the following sections. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to Short Term Construction Impacts caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. E1—E6 Pg57 Page 483 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Wgnlficent With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Rev 4-17 Criteria pollutants are defined as those pollutants for which the Federal and State governments have established AAQS, or criteria, for outdoor concentrations in order to protect public health. Data collected at permanent monitoring stations are used by the EPA to classify regions as "attainment" or "non -attainment" depending on whether the regions met the requirements stated in the primary NAAQS. Nonattainment areas have additional restrictions as required by the EPA. The EPA has designated the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) as the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) responsible for ensuring the Basin's compliance with the FCAA. The South Coast Air Basin is in Non -Attainment Status for Ozone, PMzo and PM2.5. Specific criteria for determining whether the potential air quality impacts of a project are significant are set forth in the SCAQMD's CEQA Air Quality Handbook. The criteria include daily emissions thresholds, compliance with State and national air quality standards, and consistency with the current AQMP. As prescribed by SCAQMD, an Air Quality & Climate Change Assessment (MIG Hogle-Ireland, August 2016) was prepared that utilizes CaIEEMod (Version 2013.2.2) to evaluate short-term construction emissions and short- term construction emissions for localized significant thresholds, long-term operational emissions, operation emissions for localized significant thresholds, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Short Term (Construction): Project Emissions and Impacts The project proposes to amend the General Plan land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and to amend the Zoning Map land use district from the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the General Commercial (GC) District for a 1.22 acre 2 -parcel site at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re- establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 square foot car wash on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue. The potential emissions associated with construction of the project are described in the following sections. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to Short Term Construction Impacts caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. E1—E6 Pg57 Page 483 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 10 Rev 4-17 Summary of Peak_ Construction Emissions (Estimated Maximum Dallv Construction Emissions and Regional Thresholds) Gas Sta#ion Maximum Baiiv Canshmdon Emissions (lbsfdayl sbMe• Roo " i Less Than CO Stl pai Phis' Significant Less 0.83 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With Miligattan Than Sfgnificanl No 1.47 Impact Incur orated Impact Impact Rev 4-17 Summary of Peak_ Construction Emissions (Estimated Maximum Dallv Construction Emissions and Regional Thresholds) Gas Sta#ion Maximum Baiiv Canshmdon Emissions (lbsfdayl sbMe• Roo " i nffhr CO Stl pai Phis' SrrrrYmer 1.19 0.83 Site Pro arMon 7.34 13.64 1.36 201c 1.47 14.20 9.70 0.01 1.67 1.21 Wnfer 1371 0.94 0.86 PoAng On Site 7.25 10.63 2016 1.47 14.21 5.70 0.01 1.67 1.21 Threshold 75 100 554 150 154 55 Substantial? No Na No No No No li me: MIG 2015. Construction activities associated with the project will result in emissions of CO, VOCs, NOx, SOx, PM10 and PM2,5 and are expected from the following construction activities: demolition, building construction, painting (architectural coatings), paving (curb, gutter, and flatwork), and construction worker commuting. Localized Significance Summary in Pounds Per Da Estimated Maximum Dail Construction Emissions and LSTs) Gas Station Localized Si ificanca Tbreshold Anal sis Obs da I Pf1a a co lid " PMM" Pr&54 lrriolit an 8.70 1124 1.19 0.83 Site Pro arMon 7.34 13.64 1.36 0.82 Grsding 8.70 1124 1.56 1.18 Btilding Const•uction (20161 8.21 1371 0.94 0.86 PoAng On Site 7.25 10.63 0.66 0.61 Archit-c-dural Coatnq 1.88 2.37 0.20 20 Threshofd 1.070 173 12 4 Potentially Substantial? No No Na Na 571;.7?_: MAG, M 15. The Air Quality & Climate Change Assessment (MIG Hogle-Ireland, August 2016) identifies that state requirements specifically address air toxics issues through Assembly Bill (AB) 1807 that established the State air toxics program and the Air Toxics Hot Spots Information and Assessment Act (AB 2588). The air quality regulations developed from these bills have been modified recently to incorporate the Federal regulations associated with the Federal Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990. The Air Toxics Hot Spots Information and Assessment Act (Hot Spots Act) was enacted in September 1987. Under this bill, stationary sources of emissions are required to report the types and quantities of certain substances that their facilities routinely release into the air. The SCAQMD is required to prepare an annual report on the status and forecast of air toxic hotspots pursuant to Section 44363 of the California Health and Safety Code. SCAQMD monitors facilities that are not exempt from the fee and reporting requirements of AB 2588. Some facilities are covered under umbrella permits that address industry -wide categories. SCAQMD has issued general permits for the following seven activities including: retail gasoline dispensing, perch loroethylene dry cleaning, auto body shops, fiberglass molding, printing, metal plating, and wood stripping and finishing. Emissions inventories and risk assessment guidelines have been prepared for the seven industry -wide categories. Approximately 1,400 auto body shops, 3,200 gasoline stations, and 1,400 E1 -E6 Pg58 Page 484 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 11 Rev 4-17 perch loroethylene dry cleaners within the District are covered under these umbrella permits. Depending on the severity of the facilities' toxic air contaminant (TAC) releases, SCAQMD requires either public notification of toxic hot spots or preparation of a risk reduction plan. The proposed general gasoline dispensing facility use does not include use of stationary emergency or prime compression ignition internal combustion engines, portable diesel engines, or other equipment subject to AB 2588, and therefore, a separate Health Risk Assessment was not prepared. Equipment Exhausts and Related Construction Activities Construction activities produce combustion emissions from various sources such as site grading, utility engines, on-site heavy-duty construction vehicles, asphalt paving, and motor vehicles transporting the construction crew. Exhaust emissions from construction activities envisioned on site would vary daily as construction activity levels change. The use of construction equipment on site would result in localized exhaust emissions; however, as shown in the tables above, the amount will not exceed any Local Significance Threshold, Fugitive Dust Fugitive dust emissions are generally emissions associated with land clearing and exposure of soils to the air and wind, and cut -and -fill grading operations. Dust generated during construction varies substantially on a project -by project basis, depending on the level of activity, the specific operation and weather conditions at the time of construction. Construction emissions can vary greatly depending on the level of activity, the specific operations taking place, the equipment being operated, local soils, weather conditions and other factors. The proposed project will be required to comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 to control fugitive dust. Architectural Coatings Architectural coatings contain VOCs that are similar to ROCs and are part of the Os precursors. Based on the proposed project, it is estimated that the proposed project will result in a maximum of approximately 1.47 lbs of VOC per day (combined for all construction sources) during construction. Therefore, this VOC emission is the principal air emission and is less than the SCAQMD VOC threshold of 75 lbs/day. Odors Heavy-duty equipment in the project area during construction would emit odors, However, the construction activity would cease to occur after individual construction is completed. No other sources of objectionable odors have been identified for the proposed project, and no mitigation measures are required. In compliance with SCAQMD Rule 402 the proposed uses are not anticipated to emit any objectionable odors. Therefore, objectionable odors posing a health risk to potential on-site and existing off-site uses would not occur as a result of the proposed project. El —l=6 Pg59 Page 485 Less Than Signifcant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially significant Wth Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Rev 4-17 perch loroethylene dry cleaners within the District are covered under these umbrella permits. Depending on the severity of the facilities' toxic air contaminant (TAC) releases, SCAQMD requires either public notification of toxic hot spots or preparation of a risk reduction plan. The proposed general gasoline dispensing facility use does not include use of stationary emergency or prime compression ignition internal combustion engines, portable diesel engines, or other equipment subject to AB 2588, and therefore, a separate Health Risk Assessment was not prepared. Equipment Exhausts and Related Construction Activities Construction activities produce combustion emissions from various sources such as site grading, utility engines, on-site heavy-duty construction vehicles, asphalt paving, and motor vehicles transporting the construction crew. Exhaust emissions from construction activities envisioned on site would vary daily as construction activity levels change. The use of construction equipment on site would result in localized exhaust emissions; however, as shown in the tables above, the amount will not exceed any Local Significance Threshold, Fugitive Dust Fugitive dust emissions are generally emissions associated with land clearing and exposure of soils to the air and wind, and cut -and -fill grading operations. Dust generated during construction varies substantially on a project -by project basis, depending on the level of activity, the specific operation and weather conditions at the time of construction. Construction emissions can vary greatly depending on the level of activity, the specific operations taking place, the equipment being operated, local soils, weather conditions and other factors. The proposed project will be required to comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 to control fugitive dust. Architectural Coatings Architectural coatings contain VOCs that are similar to ROCs and are part of the Os precursors. Based on the proposed project, it is estimated that the proposed project will result in a maximum of approximately 1.47 lbs of VOC per day (combined for all construction sources) during construction. Therefore, this VOC emission is the principal air emission and is less than the SCAQMD VOC threshold of 75 lbs/day. Odors Heavy-duty equipment in the project area during construction would emit odors, However, the construction activity would cease to occur after individual construction is completed. No other sources of objectionable odors have been identified for the proposed project, and no mitigation measures are required. In compliance with SCAQMD Rule 402 the proposed uses are not anticipated to emit any objectionable odors. Therefore, objectionable odors posing a health risk to potential on-site and existing off-site uses would not occur as a result of the proposed project. El —l=6 Pg59 Page 485 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 12 Rev 4-17 Naturally Occurring Asbestos The proposed project is located in San Bernardino County and it is not among the counties that are found to have serpentine and ultramafic rock in their soils. In addition, there has been no serpentine or ultramafic rock found in the project area. Therefore, the potential risk for naturally occurring asbestos (NOA) during project construction is small and less than significant. Based on the discussion above and with implementation of the following mitigation measures, short-term, construction impacts will be less -than -significant: 1) During grading activity, all construction equipment (2:150 horsepower) shall be California Air Resources Board (CARE) Tier 3 Certified or better. 2) All clearing, grading, earth -moving, or excavation activities shall cease when winds exceed 25 mph per SCAQMD guidelines in order to limit fugitive dust emissions. 3) The contractor shall ensure that all disturbed unpaved roads and disturbed areas within the Project are watered at least three (3) times daily during dry weather. Watering, with complete coverage of disturbed areas, shall occur at least three times a day, preferably in the midmorning, afternoon, and after work is done for the day. 4) The contractor shall ensure that traffic speeds on unpaved roads and Project site areas are reduced to 15 miles per hour or less. Cumulative Impacts: Short -Term Construction Emissions Continued development will contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions. In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction activities. While most of the dust would settle on or near the project site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area. Construction is an on-going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area. Construction workers and equipment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete. Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment emissions are required to be assessed. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of Air Quality based on the future build out of the City. Based upon on the Urban Emissions Model (URBEMIS7G) estimates in Table 4.3-3 of the General Plan (FPEIR), Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2), Ozone (03), and Particulate Matter (PM2.5 and PM1o) would exceed SCAQMD thresholds for significance; therefore, they would all be cumulatively considerable if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less -than -significant. This city-wide increase in emissions was identified as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council as noted in the Section 4.3 of the General Plan FPEIR. The project proposes to amend the General Plan land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and to amend the Zoning Map land use district from E1—E6 Pg60 Page 486 Less Than signir=nl Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significartt With bliligation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Rev 4-17 Naturally Occurring Asbestos The proposed project is located in San Bernardino County and it is not among the counties that are found to have serpentine and ultramafic rock in their soils. In addition, there has been no serpentine or ultramafic rock found in the project area. Therefore, the potential risk for naturally occurring asbestos (NOA) during project construction is small and less than significant. Based on the discussion above and with implementation of the following mitigation measures, short-term, construction impacts will be less -than -significant: 1) During grading activity, all construction equipment (2:150 horsepower) shall be California Air Resources Board (CARE) Tier 3 Certified or better. 2) All clearing, grading, earth -moving, or excavation activities shall cease when winds exceed 25 mph per SCAQMD guidelines in order to limit fugitive dust emissions. 3) The contractor shall ensure that all disturbed unpaved roads and disturbed areas within the Project are watered at least three (3) times daily during dry weather. Watering, with complete coverage of disturbed areas, shall occur at least three times a day, preferably in the midmorning, afternoon, and after work is done for the day. 4) The contractor shall ensure that traffic speeds on unpaved roads and Project site areas are reduced to 15 miles per hour or less. Cumulative Impacts: Short -Term Construction Emissions Continued development will contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions. In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction activities. While most of the dust would settle on or near the project site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area. Construction is an on-going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area. Construction workers and equipment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete. Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment emissions are required to be assessed. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of Air Quality based on the future build out of the City. Based upon on the Urban Emissions Model (URBEMIS7G) estimates in Table 4.3-3 of the General Plan (FPEIR), Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2), Ozone (03), and Particulate Matter (PM2.5 and PM1o) would exceed SCAQMD thresholds for significance; therefore, they would all be cumulatively considerable if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less -than -significant. This city-wide increase in emissions was identified as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council as noted in the Section 4.3 of the General Plan FPEIR. The project proposes to amend the General Plan land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and to amend the Zoning Map land use district from E1—E6 Pg60 Page 486 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 13 Rev 4-17 the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the General Commercial (GC) District for a 1.22 acre 2 -parcel site at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route and to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re- establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 square foot car wash on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue. Based on the Air Quality & Climate Change Assessment (MIG Hogle-Ireland, August 2016) no short- term, operational impacts would occur as a result of the project. Because the project would result in minimal emissions that do not exceed any thresholds of significance, the project's contribution to cumulative impacts is also considered minimal. With implementation of the following best practices and mitigation measures from the City's 2010 General Plan FPEiR that are designed to minimize short-term air quality impacts, the project's contribution to cumulative impacts will be less -than -significant: 5) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers'-specif!cations. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 6) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. 7) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 8) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction -grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in- use. 9) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 10) All,paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 11) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. E1 --E6 Pg61 Page 487 Less Than SigniFicant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PotenWiy significant Nth 6liligaUcn Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Im act Rev 4-17 the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the General Commercial (GC) District for a 1.22 acre 2 -parcel site at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route and to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re- establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 square foot car wash on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue. Based on the Air Quality & Climate Change Assessment (MIG Hogle-Ireland, August 2016) no short- term, operational impacts would occur as a result of the project. Because the project would result in minimal emissions that do not exceed any thresholds of significance, the project's contribution to cumulative impacts is also considered minimal. With implementation of the following best practices and mitigation measures from the City's 2010 General Plan FPEiR that are designed to minimize short-term air quality impacts, the project's contribution to cumulative impacts will be less -than -significant: 5) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers'-specif!cations. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 6) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. 7) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 8) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction -grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in- use. 9) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 10) All,paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 11) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. E1 --E6 Pg61 Page 487 f nitial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 14 Rev 4-17 • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24 -inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 12) The site shall be treated with water or other soil -stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB)) daily to reduce PMio emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 13) Chemical soikstabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. Prolect Long Term (Operational) Emissions and Impacts Long-term air pollutant emissions are those associated with stationary sources and mobile sources involving any project -related changes. The proposed project would result in a net increase in the amount of development in the area; therefore, the proposed project would result in net increases in both stationary and mobile source emissions. The stationary source emissions would come from additional natural gas consumption for on-site buildings and electricity for the lighting in the buildings and at the parking area. As shown in the following tables, project implementation will not exceed any significance thresholds. No long-term, operational impacts will occur as a result of the project. Summary of Peak Operational Emissions Gas Station Maxim OWpiatflons] Dail EdssEons Ilbsida I Sti3sott.' s ^`RtJfi t% Less Than ' Gt2=' t'• : < `.SCY ..�' ' PM4. Pf�lis &gnificant Less 7.50 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially significant With Mitigation Than Significant No 7.41 impact Ineor orated Impact impact Rev 4-17 • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24 -inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 12) The site shall be treated with water or other soil -stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB)) daily to reduce PMio emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 13) Chemical soikstabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. Prolect Long Term (Operational) Emissions and Impacts Long-term air pollutant emissions are those associated with stationary sources and mobile sources involving any project -related changes. The proposed project would result in a net increase in the amount of development in the area; therefore, the proposed project would result in net increases in both stationary and mobile source emissions. The stationary source emissions would come from additional natural gas consumption for on-site buildings and electricity for the lighting in the buildings and at the parking area. As shown in the following tables, project implementation will not exceed any significance thresholds. No long-term, operational impacts will occur as a result of the project. Summary of Peak Operational Emissions Gas Station Maxim OWpiatflons] Dail EdssEons Ilbsida I Sti3sott.' s ^`RtJfi t% lV ' Gt2=' t'• : < `.SCY ..�' ' PM4. Pf�lis miner 7.05 7.50 36.60 005 3.27 0.93 4Wnler 7.41 7.76 41.45 0.05 3.27 0.93 Threshold 55 55 550 150 i50 55 Substantial? No No No No No No sdltte� tiuc.-rots. E1—E6 Pg62 Page 488 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC 2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 15 Rev 4-17 Cumulative Impacts (Long Term/Operational Emissions) The General Pian Find( Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the potential impacts to air quality based on the future build out of the City. In the long-term, continued development would result in significant operational vehicle emissions based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 4.3-3 of the General Plan FPEIR; therefore, all developments would be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a less -than -significant level. This City-wide increase in emissions was identified as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council as noted in the Section 4.3 of the General Plan FPEIR. The project proposes to amend the General Plan land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and to amend the Zoning Map land use district from the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the General Commercial (GC) District for a 1.22 acre 2 -parcel site at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route and to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re- establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 square foot car wash on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue. Based on the Air Quality & Climate Change Assessment (MIG Hogle-Ireland, August 2016) no short- term, operational impacts would occur as a result of the project. Because the project would result in minimal emissions that do not exceed any thresholds of significance, the project's contribution to cumulative impacts is also considered minimal. With implementation of the following mitigation measures from the City's 2010 General Plan FPEIR that are designed to minimize long-term, operational air quality impacts, the project's contribution to cumulative impacts will be less -than -significant: 14) Provide preferential parking to high occupancy vehicles and shuttle services. 15) Schedule truck deliveries and pickups during off-peak hours. 16) Improve thermal integrity of the buildings and reduce thermal load with automated time clocks or occupant sensors. 17) Landscape with native and/or drought -resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 18) Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planting programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC -01 measure. 19) All commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high- efficiencyllow-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 20) All commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. El --E6 Pg63 Page 489 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant wlhThan Mitigation Sigmfcant No Impact Incorporated Im act Im act Rev 4-17 Cumulative Impacts (Long Term/Operational Emissions) The General Pian Find( Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the potential impacts to air quality based on the future build out of the City. In the long-term, continued development would result in significant operational vehicle emissions based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 4.3-3 of the General Plan FPEIR; therefore, all developments would be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a less -than -significant level. This City-wide increase in emissions was identified as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council as noted in the Section 4.3 of the General Plan FPEIR. The project proposes to amend the General Plan land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and to amend the Zoning Map land use district from the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the General Commercial (GC) District for a 1.22 acre 2 -parcel site at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route and to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re- establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 square foot car wash on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue. Based on the Air Quality & Climate Change Assessment (MIG Hogle-Ireland, August 2016) no short- term, operational impacts would occur as a result of the project. Because the project would result in minimal emissions that do not exceed any thresholds of significance, the project's contribution to cumulative impacts is also considered minimal. With implementation of the following mitigation measures from the City's 2010 General Plan FPEIR that are designed to minimize long-term, operational air quality impacts, the project's contribution to cumulative impacts will be less -than -significant: 14) Provide preferential parking to high occupancy vehicles and shuttle services. 15) Schedule truck deliveries and pickups during off-peak hours. 16) Improve thermal integrity of the buildings and reduce thermal load with automated time clocks or occupant sensors. 17) Landscape with native and/or drought -resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 18) Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planting programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC -01 measure. 19) All commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high- efficiencyllow-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 20) All commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. El --E6 Pg63 Page 489 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683,-DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 16 C) As noted in the General Plan FEiR (Section 4.3), continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. The General Plan FPEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. As noted in subsection b above, the project proposes to amend the General Plan land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and to amend the Zoning Map land use district from the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the General Commercial (GC) District for a 1.22 acre 2 -parcel site at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route and to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re-establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 square foot car wash on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue. Based on the Air Quality & Climate Change Assessment (MIG Hogle- Ireiand, August 2016) no short-term, operational impacts would occur as a result of the project. Because the project would result in minimal emissions that do not exceed any thresholds of significance, the project's contribution to cumulative impacts is also considered minimal. With implementation of mitigation measures listed in subsection b) above from the City's 2010 General Plan FPEIR, which are designed to minimize long-term, operational air quality impacts, cumulative impacts will be less -than -significant. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to air quality caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large. The SCAQMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors: long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities. According to the SCAQMD, projects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 114 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401. The project site is located within 114 mile of a school directly north of the project site and residences that are to the north, south, east, and west of the site. Potential impacts to air quality are consistent with the Public Health and Safety Super -Element within the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. Refer to discussion under 3.b) above regarding SCAQMD reporting requirements for AB 2588 for toxic air contaminant releases. Rev 4-17 During construction, there is the possibility of fugitive dust to be generated from grading the site. The mitigation measures listed under subsection b above and the following mitigation measure will reduce any potential impact to less -than -significant levels. E1—E6 Pg64 Page 490 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting information Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigatlan Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Im act C) As noted in the General Plan FEiR (Section 4.3), continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. The General Plan FPEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. As noted in subsection b above, the project proposes to amend the General Plan land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and to amend the Zoning Map land use district from the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the General Commercial (GC) District for a 1.22 acre 2 -parcel site at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route and to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re-establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 square foot car wash on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue. Based on the Air Quality & Climate Change Assessment (MIG Hogle- Ireiand, August 2016) no short-term, operational impacts would occur as a result of the project. Because the project would result in minimal emissions that do not exceed any thresholds of significance, the project's contribution to cumulative impacts is also considered minimal. With implementation of mitigation measures listed in subsection b) above from the City's 2010 General Plan FPEIR, which are designed to minimize long-term, operational air quality impacts, cumulative impacts will be less -than -significant. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to air quality caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large. The SCAQMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors: long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities. According to the SCAQMD, projects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 114 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401. The project site is located within 114 mile of a school directly north of the project site and residences that are to the north, south, east, and west of the site. Potential impacts to air quality are consistent with the Public Health and Safety Super -Element within the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. Refer to discussion under 3.b) above regarding SCAQMD reporting requirements for AB 2588 for toxic air contaminant releases. Rev 4-17 During construction, there is the possibility of fugitive dust to be generated from grading the site. The mitigation measures listed under subsection b above and the following mitigation measure will reduce any potential impact to less -than -significant levels. E1—E6 Pg64 Page 490 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 17 General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to air quality caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. e) Construction odors (Short-term) may include odors associated with equipment use including diesel exhaust or roofing, painting and paving. These odors are temporary and would dissipate rapidly. Operational odors (Long-term) are typically associated with the type of use. According to the Air Quality & Climate Change Assessment (MIG Hogle- Ireland, August 2016), the proposed gas station and hypothetical commercial office/retail uses do not produce odors that could affect a substantial number of people. Fuel is stored in sealed, underground storage tanks and pumps are equipped with emissions equipment designed to minimize evaporative loss. Considering the proposed gas station fuels are stored in a manner in which fumes are contained, odors from the project are not expected to affect a substantial number of people. Project generated refuse would be, stored in covered containers and removed at regular intervals. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to air quality caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: Less Than a) Have a -substantial adverse effect, either directly or significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially signifuant wth hldigaOon Than Significant no as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in Impact Incorporated Impact Impact General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to air quality caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. e) Construction odors (Short-term) may include odors associated with equipment use including diesel exhaust or roofing, painting and paving. These odors are temporary and would dissipate rapidly. Operational odors (Long-term) are typically associated with the type of use. According to the Air Quality & Climate Change Assessment (MIG Hogle- Ireland, August 2016), the proposed gas station and hypothetical commercial office/retail uses do not produce odors that could affect a substantial number of people. Fuel is stored in sealed, underground storage tanks and pumps are equipped with emissions equipment designed to minimize evaporative loss. Considering the proposed gas station fuels are stored in a manner in which fumes are contained, odors from the project are not expected to affect a substantial number of people. Project generated refuse would be, stored in covered containers and removed at regular intervals. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to air quality caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Have a -substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat or () () () (✓) other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? C) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally O O O (✓) protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? Rev 4-17 Ell --E6 Pg65 Page 491 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 18 d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native (} Less Than (} (✓) resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with Significant Less Issues and Supporting information Sources: Potentially significant with Mitigation Than Significant No corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery Impact Incur orated Impact Impact d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native (} () (} (✓) resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting () () () (✓) biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat () (} () (✓) Conservation Pian, Natural Community conservation Pian, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan? Comments: a) The project proposes to amend the General Plan land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and to amend the Zoning Map land use district from the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the General Commercial (GC) District for a 1.22 acre 2 -parcel site at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route and to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re- establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 square foot car wash on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue. The project site is currently fully developed with the existing building, landscaping, vehicle parking (truck and car), and all frontage improvements. According to the General Plan Figure RC -4, and Section 4.4 of the General Plan FPEIR, the project site is not located within an area with a soil type that accommodates the Delhi Sands flower -loving fly. Because the site is fully developed with an existing building, parking, and landscaping improvements, no other sensitive biological resources or endangered species of plants or animals were found on the site. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 4-17 Additionally, habitat suitable for migratory bird nesting is present within the survey area. Mitigation measures are recommended, including avoidance of vegetation clearing or grubbing during the nesting season to prevent impacts to raptors and migratory birds. if clearing and grubbing cannot be avoided during the nesting season mitigation measures require that a nesting bird survey be conducted by a qualified biologist prior to vegetation clearing or ground disturbing activities. If active nests are located during preconstruction surveys, a qualified biologist will develop and implement a plan to avoid nests and minimize and prevent impacts to nesting birds. 1) Three days prior to the removal of vegetation or ground -disturbing activities, a breeding bird survey that is in conformance with the Migratory Bird Act shall be required to determine whether nesting is occurring. Occupied nests shall not be disturbed unless a qualified biologist verifies through non- invasive methods that either (a) the adult birds have not begun egg -laying or incubation; or (b) the juveniles from the occupied nests are foraging independently and are capable of independent survival. If the biologist is unable to verify one of the above conditions, then no disturbance shall occur within 300 feet of non -raptor nests, and within 5,000 feet of raptor nests, during the breeding season to avoid abandonment of the young. E1 --E6 Pg66 Page 492 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 19 If nests are discovered, they shall be avoided through the establishment of an appropriate buffer setback, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. The temporary "no construction" area shall be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and have left the nest, construction in the area may resume. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to biological resources caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. b) The project site is located in an urban area with no natural communities. No riparian habitat exists on-site, meaning the project will not have any impacts. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. C) No wetland habitat is present on-site. As a result, project implementation would have no impact on these resources. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The City is primarily located in an urban area that does not contain large, contiguous natural open space areas. Wildlife potentially may move through the north/south trending tributaries in the northern portion of the City and within the Sphere of Influence. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. e) There are 9 California Sycamore (Platanus racemosa) trees on site all planted with the development of the existing service station building; none of these 9 trees meet Development Code criteria to be considered a Heritage Tree. The Development Code defines heritage trees as all eucalyptus windrows, any tree in excess of thirty feet (30') in height and having a single trunk with a diameter of twenty inches (20") or more, a multi - trunk having a diameter of thirty inches (30") or more, a stand of trees the nature of which makes each dependent upon the others for survival, and any other tree as may be deemed historically or culturally significant because of age, size, condition, or aesthetic qualities. The existing trees along the north, west, and south project boundary will remain in place, the tree along the east property line appears to be dead, interferes with proposed driveway improvements, and will be removed. There are no trees located on the adjacent parcel included with the proposed General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment applications. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. f} Neither the City, nor the SOI, are within an adopted HCP, NCCP, or other approved State Habitat Conservation Pian area. The project site is not located within a local conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Figure RC -1. No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 4-17 E1—E6 Pg67 Page 493 Less Than Significant Less Potentially Issues and Supporting Information Sources: significant With Mitigation Than significant No Impact Incur crated Impact Impact If nests are discovered, they shall be avoided through the establishment of an appropriate buffer setback, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. The temporary "no construction" area shall be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and have left the nest, construction in the area may resume. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to biological resources caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. b) The project site is located in an urban area with no natural communities. No riparian habitat exists on-site, meaning the project will not have any impacts. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. C) No wetland habitat is present on-site. As a result, project implementation would have no impact on these resources. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The City is primarily located in an urban area that does not contain large, contiguous natural open space areas. Wildlife potentially may move through the north/south trending tributaries in the northern portion of the City and within the Sphere of Influence. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. e) There are 9 California Sycamore (Platanus racemosa) trees on site all planted with the development of the existing service station building; none of these 9 trees meet Development Code criteria to be considered a Heritage Tree. The Development Code defines heritage trees as all eucalyptus windrows, any tree in excess of thirty feet (30') in height and having a single trunk with a diameter of twenty inches (20") or more, a multi - trunk having a diameter of thirty inches (30") or more, a stand of trees the nature of which makes each dependent upon the others for survival, and any other tree as may be deemed historically or culturally significant because of age, size, condition, or aesthetic qualities. The existing trees along the north, west, and south project boundary will remain in place, the tree along the east property line appears to be dead, interferes with proposed driveway improvements, and will be removed. There are no trees located on the adjacent parcel included with the proposed General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment applications. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. f} Neither the City, nor the SOI, are within an adopted HCP, NCCP, or other approved State Habitat Conservation Pian area. The project site is not located within a local conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Figure RC -1. No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 4-17 E1—E6 Pg67 Page 493 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 20 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: Less Than a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance () Significant Less (✓) Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially srgniicanl Wilh Mitigation Than Signiricant No b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance () () () (✓) of a historical resource as defined in § 15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance () (✓) () ( ) of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064.6? C) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological {) (✓) {) ( ) resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred () (} () (✓) outside of formal cemeteries? Comments: a) A Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment (MIG Hogle-Ireland, August 2016) analyzed the potential impacts to cultural resources within the project site and its surroundings. The cultural resources records search from the CHRIS-SCIC indicated that there were no historical resources within the project area and no historical resources were identified during the pedestrian survey. The project site has not been identified as a "Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2.24 (Historic Preservation). Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan. Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to historical resources caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. b) A Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment (MIG Hogle-Ireland, August 2016) analyzed the potential impacts to archaeological resources within the project site and its surroundings. The cultural resources records search from the CHRIS-SCIC indicated that there were no archaeological resources within the project area and no archaeological resources were identified during the pedestrian survey. There are no known archaeological sites or resources recorded on the project site; however, the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.6). Construction activity, particularly grading, soil excavation, and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of Cultural Resources based on the future build out of the City. The following mitigation measures as identified in the FPEIR shall be implemented: Rev 4-17 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the qualified archaeologist will take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: E1—E6 Pg68 Page 494 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 21 • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. ® Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with Section 21083.2 Archaeological resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, including but not limited to, avoiding archaeological sites, capping or covering sites with soil, planning the site as a park or green space or paying an in-kind mitigation fee. Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to archeological resources caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicablemitigation measures will be implemented. C) The General Plan FPE1R (Section 4.6) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan. According to the research performed at the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County and the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the Sphere -of - Influence, including the project site; however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources. The older alluvium, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last "Ice Age" and the appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils. The project site is underlain by Quaternary alluvium per the Public Safety Element of the General Plan. Therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further Rev 4-17 E1 --E6 Pg69 Page 495 Less Than Signiricanl Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Polenlially Signircanl With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Inco orated Impact Impact • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. ® Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with Section 21083.2 Archaeological resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, including but not limited to, avoiding archaeological sites, capping or covering sites with soil, planning the site as a park or green space or paying an in-kind mitigation fee. Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to archeological resources caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicablemitigation measures will be implemented. C) The General Plan FPE1R (Section 4.6) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan. According to the research performed at the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County and the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the Sphere -of - Influence, including the project site; however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources. The older alluvium, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last "Ice Age" and the appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils. The project site is underlain by Quaternary alluvium per the Public Safety Element of the General Plan. Therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further Rev 4-17 E1 --E6 Pg69 Page 495 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 22 mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth -disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth -disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to paleontological resources caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. d) The proposed project is in an area that has already been disturbed by grading, existing on- site and surrounding development. The site has been previously disrupted during the construction existing on-site improvements, adjacent infrastructure, and surrounding developments. No known religious or sacred sites exist within the project area. No evidence is in place to suggest the project site has been used for human burials. The California Health and Safety Code (Section 7050.5) states that if human remains are discovered on-site, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. As adherence to State regulations is required for all development, no mitigation is required in the unlikely event human remains are discovered on-site. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 4-17 General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00664 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) E1 --E6 Pg70 Page 496 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Im ac1 Incorporated Impact Impact mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth -disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth -disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to paleontological resources caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. d) The proposed project is in an area that has already been disturbed by grading, existing on- site and surrounding development. The site has been previously disrupted during the construction existing on-site improvements, adjacent infrastructure, and surrounding developments. No known religious or sacred sites exist within the project area. No evidence is in place to suggest the project site has been used for human burials. The California Health and Safety Code (Section 7050.5) states that if human remains are discovered on-site, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. As adherence to State regulations is required for all development, no mitigation is required in the unlikely event human remains are discovered on-site. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 4-17 General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00664 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) E1 --E6 Pg70 Page 496 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 23 to human remains caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project: Less Than a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially significant With Mitigation Than Significant No death involving: Impact Incorporated Impact Impact to human remains caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as O O O (✓} delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii} Strong seismic ground shaking? () () () (✓) iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including O O O (✓) liquefaction? iv) Landslides? () () () (✓) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? (} () () (✓) C) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or () () () (✓) that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table () {) () {✓} 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use O O O (✓) of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? Comments: a) No known faults pass through the site and it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault, according to the General Plan Figure PS -2, and Section 4.7 of the General Plan FPEIR. The Red Hill Fault, passes with approximately 1.0 miles northwest of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 4.0 miles north of the site. These faults are both capable of producing Mw6.0-7.0 earthquakes. Also, the San Jacinto fault, capable of producing up to Mw 7.5 earthquakes is 14.0 miles northeasterly of the site and the San Andreas, capable of up to Mw8.2 earthquakes, is 16.0 miles northeasterly of the site. Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking. Adhering to the Uniform Building Code and Standard Conditions will ensure that geologic impacts are fess -than -significant. Rev 4-17 General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: E1—E6 Pg71 Page 497 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 24 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to geology and soils caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. b) The City of Rancho Cucamonga is within a designated Soil Erosion Control Area Exhibit 4.7-4 of the General Plan FPEIR. The proposed project will require the excavation, stockpiling, and/or movement of on-site soils. The Rancho Cucamonga area is subject to strong Santa Ana wind conditions during September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems. Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust control; however, development of this project under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area as pavement, roads, buildings, and landscaping are established. Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less -than -significant levels: 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil -stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re -planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PMlo emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil -stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PMio emissions. General Pian Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to geology and sells caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. C) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.7) indicates that there is a potential for the hillside areas at the northern end of the City and in the S01 for slope failure, landslides, and/or erosion. Areas subject to slope instability contain slopes of 30 percent or greater. Landslides may be induced by seismic activity, rain, or construction. The City Hillside Development Regulations prohibits the development within slopes of 30 percent or greater and limit the number of units that could be constructed within the Hillside Residential and Very Low Density Residential designations in the Hillside areas. The site is not within an Earthquake hazard zone or other unstable geologic unit or soil type according to General Pian FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-2. Soil types on-site consist of Hanford Sandy Loam (HbA) Soil Rev 4-17 ET—E6 Pg72 Page 498 Less Than Signifcani Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources; Potentially significant With Mitigation lIncorporated Than &gnificant uv Impact IM13act Im act 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to geology and soils caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. b) The City of Rancho Cucamonga is within a designated Soil Erosion Control Area Exhibit 4.7-4 of the General Plan FPEIR. The proposed project will require the excavation, stockpiling, and/or movement of on-site soils. The Rancho Cucamonga area is subject to strong Santa Ana wind conditions during September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems. Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust control; however, development of this project under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area as pavement, roads, buildings, and landscaping are established. Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less -than -significant levels: 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil -stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re -planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PMlo emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil -stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PMio emissions. General Pian Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to geology and sells caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. C) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.7) indicates that there is a potential for the hillside areas at the northern end of the City and in the S01 for slope failure, landslides, and/or erosion. Areas subject to slope instability contain slopes of 30 percent or greater. Landslides may be induced by seismic activity, rain, or construction. The City Hillside Development Regulations prohibits the development within slopes of 30 percent or greater and limit the number of units that could be constructed within the Hillside Residential and Very Low Density Residential designations in the Hillside areas. The site is not within an Earthquake hazard zone or other unstable geologic unit or soil type according to General Pian FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-2. Soil types on-site consist of Hanford Sandy Loam (HbA) Soil Rev 4-17 ET—E6 Pg72 Page 498 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 25 association according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit4.7-3. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to geology and soils caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. d) The majority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the project site, is located on alluvial soil deposits. These types of soils are not considered to be expansive. Soil types on-site consist of Hanford Sandy Loam (HbA) Soil association according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-3. With adherence to standard building techniques in accordance with the building code, no adverse impacts are anticipated. e) The project will connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal. No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed. No adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above, When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to wastewater disposal requirements caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. 7. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. Would the project: Less Than a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or O Significant Less ( ) Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With Witigation Than significant Ive environment? Impact Incorporated Impact Im act association according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit4.7-3. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to geology and soils caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. d) The majority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the project site, is located on alluvial soil deposits. These types of soils are not considered to be expansive. Soil types on-site consist of Hanford Sandy Loam (HbA) Soil association according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-3. With adherence to standard building techniques in accordance with the building code, no adverse impacts are anticipated. e) The project will connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal. No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed. No adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above, When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to wastewater disposal requirements caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. 7. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. Would the project: a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or O (✓) (} ( ) indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the .emissions of greenhouse gases? Comments: a) Regulations and Significance — The Federal government began studying the phenomenon of global warming as early as 1979 with the National Climate Protection Act (92 Stat. 601). In June of 2005, Governor Schwarzenegger established California's Green House Gas (GHG) emissions reduction target in Executive Order (EO) S-3-05. The EO created goals to reduce GHG emissions for the State of California to 2000 levels by 2010; GHG emissions reduced to 1990 levels by 2020; and GHG emissions reduced to 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050. Additionally, an December 7, 2009, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) issued findings regarding GHGs under rule 202(a) of the Clean Air Act: Rev 4-17 E1—E6 Pg73 Page 499 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 26 Rev 4-17 (1) that GHGs endanger human health; and (2) that this will be the first steps to regulating GHGs through the Federal Clean Air Act. The USEPA defines 6 key GHGs (carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PA=Cs), and sulfur hexafluoride (SFe)). The combined emissions of these well -mixed greenhouse gases from new motor vehicles and engines contribute to GHG pollution. The western states, including Arizona, California, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah,. and Washington, already experience hotter, drier climates. California is a substantial contributor of GHGs and is expected to see an increase of 3 to 4 degrees Fahrenheit (OF) over the next century. Assembly Bill (AB) 32 requires that the California Air Resources Board (ARB), the lead agency for implementing AB 32, determine what the statewide GHG emission level was in 1990 and approve a statewide GHG emissions limit (427 million metric tons of CO2 equivalent) to be achieved by 2020 and prepare a Scoping Pian to outline the main strategies for meeting the 2020 deadline. Significant progress can be made toward the 2020 goal through existing technologies and improving the efficiency of energy use. Other solutions would include improving the State's infrastructure, and transitioning to cleaner and more efficient sources of energy. The ARB estimates that 38 percent of the State's GHG emissions in 2004 was from transportation sources followed by electricity generation (both in -State and out -of -State) at 28 percent and industrial at 20 percent. Residential and commercial activities account for 9 percent, agricultural uses at 6 percent, high global warming potential gases at 3 percent, and recycling and waste at 1 percent. It is not anticipated that any single development project would have a substantial effect on global climate change but that GHG emissions from the project would combine with emissions across California, the United States, and the world to cumulatively contribute to global climate change. Therefore, consistent with the ARB's Climate Change Scoping Plan, the proposed project was evaluated for consistency with the Early Action Measures (Scoping Plan is a recommendation until adopted through normal rulemaking). The proposed project is assessed by determining its consistency with the 37 Recommended Actions identified by ARB. [n compliance with Senate Bill (SB) 97 and CEQA, the project has been analyzed based on a qualitative analysis (CEQA 15084.4). Additionally, the ARB was directed through SB 375 to develop regional GHG emission reduction targets to be achieved within the automobile -and light truck sectors for 2020 and 2035. SCAQMD and ARB maintain ambient air quality monitoring stations in the Basin. The stations closest to the project site are the Upland station and the Fontana -Arrow Highway station. The Upland station monitors all criteria pollutants except PM1o, PM2.5, and SO2 which are monitored at the Fontana -Arrow Highway station. The ambient air quality in the project area for CO, NO2, and SO2 are consistently below the relevant State and Federal standards (based on ARB and EPA from 2007, 2008, and 2009 readings). Ozone, PM1o, and PM2.5 levels all exceed State and Federal standards regularly. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When E1—E6 Pg74 Page 500 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Signif ent Wth Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Im act Rev 4-17 (1) that GHGs endanger human health; and (2) that this will be the first steps to regulating GHGs through the Federal Clean Air Act. The USEPA defines 6 key GHGs (carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PA=Cs), and sulfur hexafluoride (SFe)). The combined emissions of these well -mixed greenhouse gases from new motor vehicles and engines contribute to GHG pollution. The western states, including Arizona, California, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah,. and Washington, already experience hotter, drier climates. California is a substantial contributor of GHGs and is expected to see an increase of 3 to 4 degrees Fahrenheit (OF) over the next century. Assembly Bill (AB) 32 requires that the California Air Resources Board (ARB), the lead agency for implementing AB 32, determine what the statewide GHG emission level was in 1990 and approve a statewide GHG emissions limit (427 million metric tons of CO2 equivalent) to be achieved by 2020 and prepare a Scoping Pian to outline the main strategies for meeting the 2020 deadline. Significant progress can be made toward the 2020 goal through existing technologies and improving the efficiency of energy use. Other solutions would include improving the State's infrastructure, and transitioning to cleaner and more efficient sources of energy. The ARB estimates that 38 percent of the State's GHG emissions in 2004 was from transportation sources followed by electricity generation (both in -State and out -of -State) at 28 percent and industrial at 20 percent. Residential and commercial activities account for 9 percent, agricultural uses at 6 percent, high global warming potential gases at 3 percent, and recycling and waste at 1 percent. It is not anticipated that any single development project would have a substantial effect on global climate change but that GHG emissions from the project would combine with emissions across California, the United States, and the world to cumulatively contribute to global climate change. Therefore, consistent with the ARB's Climate Change Scoping Plan, the proposed project was evaluated for consistency with the Early Action Measures (Scoping Plan is a recommendation until adopted through normal rulemaking). The proposed project is assessed by determining its consistency with the 37 Recommended Actions identified by ARB. [n compliance with Senate Bill (SB) 97 and CEQA, the project has been analyzed based on a qualitative analysis (CEQA 15084.4). Additionally, the ARB was directed through SB 375 to develop regional GHG emission reduction targets to be achieved within the automobile -and light truck sectors for 2020 and 2035. SCAQMD and ARB maintain ambient air quality monitoring stations in the Basin. The stations closest to the project site are the Upland station and the Fontana -Arrow Highway station. The Upland station monitors all criteria pollutants except PM1o, PM2.5, and SO2 which are monitored at the Fontana -Arrow Highway station. The ambient air quality in the project area for CO, NO2, and SO2 are consistently below the relevant State and Federal standards (based on ARB and EPA from 2007, 2008, and 2009 readings). Ozone, PM1o, and PM2.5 levels all exceed State and Federal standards regularly. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When E1—E6 Pg74 Page 500 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 27 Rev 4-17 applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) due to greenhouse gases generated by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. Pro'ect Related Sources of GHG's — Based on the Guidelines for the Implementation of California Environmental Quality Act, Appendix G, a project would normally be considered to have a significant effect on air quality if the project would violate any ambient air quality standards, contribute substantially to an existing air quality violation, expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations, or conflict with adopted environmental plans and goals of the community. However, neither the CEQA statutes, Office of Planning and Research (OPR) guidelines, nor the draft proposed changes to the CEQA Guidelines prescribe thresholds of significance or a particular methodology for performing an impact analysis. Significance criteria are left to the judgment and discretion of the Lead Agency. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has not adopted a threshold of significance for GHG emissions. However, a screening threshold of 3,000 MTCO2e per year is based upon South Coast Air Quality Management District staff's proposed GHG screening threshold for stationary sources emissions for non -industrial projects, as described in the SCAQMD's Interim CEQA GHG Significance Threshold for Stationary Sources, Rules, and Plans. Project related GHG's would include emissions from direct and indirect sources. Based on the Air Quality & Climate Change Assessment (MIG Hogle-Ireland, August 2016), total project related emissions would be 528 MTCO2eglyear, as shown in the following table: E1—E6 Pg75 Page 501 Less Than Significant fess Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact impact Rev 4-17 applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) due to greenhouse gases generated by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. Pro'ect Related Sources of GHG's — Based on the Guidelines for the Implementation of California Environmental Quality Act, Appendix G, a project would normally be considered to have a significant effect on air quality if the project would violate any ambient air quality standards, contribute substantially to an existing air quality violation, expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations, or conflict with adopted environmental plans and goals of the community. However, neither the CEQA statutes, Office of Planning and Research (OPR) guidelines, nor the draft proposed changes to the CEQA Guidelines prescribe thresholds of significance or a particular methodology for performing an impact analysis. Significance criteria are left to the judgment and discretion of the Lead Agency. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has not adopted a threshold of significance for GHG emissions. However, a screening threshold of 3,000 MTCO2e per year is based upon South Coast Air Quality Management District staff's proposed GHG screening threshold for stationary sources emissions for non -industrial projects, as described in the SCAQMD's Interim CEQA GHG Significance Threshold for Stationary Sources, Rules, and Plans. Project related GHG's would include emissions from direct and indirect sources. Based on the Air Quality & Climate Change Assessment (MIG Hogle-Ireland, August 2016), total project related emissions would be 528 MTCO2eglyear, as shown in the following table: E1—E6 Pg75 Page 501 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 28 i GKG BWk§� Less Than Year ,.Cfiz =GFL= C'#iti; 7GiAt 2D16 76 Signiflcant Less AMORTIZED ED TOTAL" 3 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Mote. Slight vartat�ws may occur due to rounc5rq Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Rev 4-17 Gas Station CorWroction Greenhouse Gas Emissions GanStr[€btiarl GKG BWk§� PATI Year ,.Cfiz =GFL= C'#iti; 7GiAt 2D16 76 <i 0 76 AMORTIZED ED TOTAL" 3 <1 0 3 4 MTCO2E 3oiid Waste t Mote. Slight vartat�ws may occur due to rounc5rq 0 2 ,, Amortized cvv 30 -years 3 <1 Gas Station Operational Greenhouse Gas Emissions Sarti'c� � � .: �lilG F_riiiissiiarls lyl"ffYR , TOTAU Energy 32 ell <;1 32 Mobile 487 <1 0 A87 3oiid Waste t <1 0 2 InterWastewater 3 <1 <1 3 TOTAL 523 <? f 52.5 WI CO2ETYR Mote: Sti ht variations rmy oxer due to rouricarlq Gas Station Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory 5a`arce• `.. ;. ::G#�CiEsiii�is. •�R TOTAL,, Construction 3 <I 0 3 C .,ration 523 <1 ¢t 525 Grand Total sa WCOMYR 141rAe: Slight variations may occur due to rvurdng ^ Construction int cls arioitied over 107 Ws As shown in the table, direct and indirect operational emissions associated with the project as compared to the SCAQMD's interim threshold of significance of 3,000 MTCO2e per year would result in a less than significant impact with respect to GHG emissions. Cumulative Short Term (Construction) GHG Emissions — The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.5) indicates that GHG emissions result from construction activities associated with diesel -powered construction equipment and other combustion sources (i.e. Generators, workers vehicles, material delivery, etc.). The GHG emitted by construction equipment is primarily carbon dioxide (CO2). The highest levels of construction related GHG's occur during site preparation including demolition, grading and excavation. Construction related GHG's are also emitted from off-site haul trucks and construction workers traveling to the job site. Exhaust emissions from construction activities would vary each day with the changes in construction activity on site. The combustion of fossil -based fuels creates GHG's such as CO2, Cha, and. N20. CH4 is emitted during the fueling of heavy equipment. Based on the Air Quality & Climate Change Assessment (MIG Hogle-Ireland, August 2016), no significant impacts to GHGs from short-term construction impacts would occur as a result of the project as shown in the table above. Because the project would result in minimal emissions that do not exceed the SCAQMD's interim threshold of significance, the project's contribution to cumulative impacts is also considered minimal. E1—E6 Pg76 Page 502 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684., City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 29 Rev 4-17 The proposed project would have less than a significant short-term cumulative impact with implementation of the following enforceable actions, which are included as mitigation measures in accordance with Mitigation Measure 4.5-1 of the 2010 General Plan Update FPEIR: 1) The project must comply with all rules that assist in reducing short-term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAQMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil -stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 2) The construction contractor shall select construction equipment based on low -emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures' specification. 3) Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 minutes. 4) Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline- or diesel -powered engines where feasible. 5) Construction should be timed so as not to interfere with peak -hour traffic. 6) Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be supported and encouraged for the construction crew. Cumulative Long Term (Operational) GHG's Emissions — The primary source of GHG emissions generated by the proposed project would be from motor vehicles, combustion of natural gas for space and water heating, as well as off-site GHG emissions from generation of electricity consumed by the proposed land use development over a long term. CEQA requires the Lead Agency to review the project for "adequacy, completeness, and a good faith effort at full disclosure," to determine potential impacts of GHG's. Therefore, the project has been analyzed based on methodologies and information available to the City at the time this document was prepared. Estimates are based on past performance and represent a scenario that is a worst case with the understanding that technology changes may reduce GHG emissions in the future. To date, there is no established quantified GHG emission threshold. The project proposes to amend the General Plan land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and to amend the Zoning Map land use district from the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the General Commercial (GC) District for a 1.22 acre 2 -parcel site at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route and to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re- establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 square foot car wash on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue. The proposed project will incorporate several design features that are consistent with the California Office of the Attorney General's recommended measures to reduce GHG emission including: water efficient landscaping, shade trees, and walkways that provide accessibility to public sidewalks. E1 --E6 Pg77 Page 503 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentia[ly Significant Wth Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Inver orated Impact Impact Rev 4-17 The proposed project would have less than a significant short-term cumulative impact with implementation of the following enforceable actions, which are included as mitigation measures in accordance with Mitigation Measure 4.5-1 of the 2010 General Plan Update FPEIR: 1) The project must comply with all rules that assist in reducing short-term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAQMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil -stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 2) The construction contractor shall select construction equipment based on low -emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures' specification. 3) Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 minutes. 4) Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline- or diesel -powered engines where feasible. 5) Construction should be timed so as not to interfere with peak -hour traffic. 6) Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be supported and encouraged for the construction crew. Cumulative Long Term (Operational) GHG's Emissions — The primary source of GHG emissions generated by the proposed project would be from motor vehicles, combustion of natural gas for space and water heating, as well as off-site GHG emissions from generation of electricity consumed by the proposed land use development over a long term. CEQA requires the Lead Agency to review the project for "adequacy, completeness, and a good faith effort at full disclosure," to determine potential impacts of GHG's. Therefore, the project has been analyzed based on methodologies and information available to the City at the time this document was prepared. Estimates are based on past performance and represent a scenario that is a worst case with the understanding that technology changes may reduce GHG emissions in the future. To date, there is no established quantified GHG emission threshold. The project proposes to amend the General Plan land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and to amend the Zoning Map land use district from the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the General Commercial (GC) District for a 1.22 acre 2 -parcel site at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route and to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re- establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 square foot car wash on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue. The proposed project will incorporate several design features that are consistent with the California Office of the Attorney General's recommended measures to reduce GHG emission including: water efficient landscaping, shade trees, and walkways that provide accessibility to public sidewalks. E1 --E6 Pg77 Page 503 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 30 Rev 4-17 The project is consistent with the California Environmental 'Protection Agency Climate Action Team proposed early action measures to mitigate climate change included in the CARB Scoping Plan mandated under AB 32, The proposed project will incorporate several design features including: water efficient landscaping, shade trees, and walkways that provide accessibility to public sidewalks. Additionally, the City is participating in the development of a Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) with SANBAG for the San Bernardino County area pursuant to Senate Bill (SB) 375. Based on the Air Quality & Climate Change Assessment (M1G Hogle-Ireland, August 2016), no significant impacts to GHGs from long-term, operational impacts would occur as a result of the project as shown in the table above. Because the project would result in minimal emissions that do not exceed the SCAQMD's interim threshold of significance, the project's contribution to cumulative impacts is also considered minimal. The proposed project would have less than a significant long-term operational impact with implementation of the following enforceable actions, which are included as mitigation measures in accordance with Mitigation Measure 4.5-1 of the 2010 General Plan Update FPEIR: 7) Construction and Building materials shall be produced and/or manufactured locally. Use "Green Building Materials" such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low -volatile -organic -compound (VOC) materials. 8) Design all buildings to exceed California Building Code Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of: • Increased insulation. • Limit air leakage through the structure. • Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances. • Landscape and develop site utilizing shade, prevailing winds and landscaping. • Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems. • Install light colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements. • Install solar or light emitting diodes (LED's) for outdoor lighting. 9) Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and include the following: Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available or as required by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD). E Z --E6 Pg78 Page 504 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially significant With Mitigation Than significant No Impact I incorporated Impact fm act Rev 4-17 The project is consistent with the California Environmental 'Protection Agency Climate Action Team proposed early action measures to mitigate climate change included in the CARB Scoping Plan mandated under AB 32, The proposed project will incorporate several design features including: water efficient landscaping, shade trees, and walkways that provide accessibility to public sidewalks. Additionally, the City is participating in the development of a Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) with SANBAG for the San Bernardino County area pursuant to Senate Bill (SB) 375. Based on the Air Quality & Climate Change Assessment (M1G Hogle-Ireland, August 2016), no significant impacts to GHGs from long-term, operational impacts would occur as a result of the project as shown in the table above. Because the project would result in minimal emissions that do not exceed the SCAQMD's interim threshold of significance, the project's contribution to cumulative impacts is also considered minimal. The proposed project would have less than a significant long-term operational impact with implementation of the following enforceable actions, which are included as mitigation measures in accordance with Mitigation Measure 4.5-1 of the 2010 General Plan Update FPEIR: 7) Construction and Building materials shall be produced and/or manufactured locally. Use "Green Building Materials" such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low -volatile -organic -compound (VOC) materials. 8) Design all buildings to exceed California Building Code Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of: • Increased insulation. • Limit air leakage through the structure. • Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances. • Landscape and develop site utilizing shade, prevailing winds and landscaping. • Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems. • Install light colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements. • Install solar or light emitting diodes (LED's) for outdoor lighting. 9) Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and include the following: Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available or as required by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD). E Z --E6 Pg78 Page 504 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 31 Design building to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets; dual flush toilets and waterless urinalstwater heaters. Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non- vegetated surfaces. 10) Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educate employees about reducing waste and about recycling. b) The project proposes to amend the General Plan land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial. and to amend the Zoning Map land use district from the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the General Commercial (GC) District for a 1.22 acre 2 -parcel site at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route and to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re- establish 'an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 square foot car wash on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue. Rev 4-17 No other applicable plans, policies, or regulations adopted forthe purpose of reducing GHG emission apply to the project. The 2010 General Plan Update includes adopted policies and Standard Conditions that respond to the Attorney General and the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA). The General Plan policies and Standard Conditions guide infill and sustainable development reliant on pedestrian connections, re- use and rehabilitation of existing structures, link transportation opportunities, promote development that is sensitive to natural resources and incentivizes denser mixed-use projects that maximizes diverse opportunities. The proposed project includes water efficient landscaping, shade trees, and walkways that provide accessibility to public sidewalks and therefore is consistent with the sustainability and climate change policies of the General Plan. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of GHG's and determined that GHG emissions would be cumulatively considerable, which would be a significant, unavoidable adverse cumulative impact. A Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. Based on the Air Quality & Climate Change Assessment (MIG Hogle-Ireland, August 2016), no significant impacts to GHGs from short-term, construction impacts or long-term, operational impacts would occur as a result of the project. Because the project would result in minimal emissions that do not exceed the SCAQMD's interim threshold of significance, the project's contribution to GHGs from short-term construction and long-term operational cumulative impacts is also considered minimal. With implementation of the mitigation measures listed in subsection a), less than significant impacts would occur as a result of the project. In addition, the proposed project would not hinder the State's GHG reduction goals established by AB 32 and therefore would be less than a significant impact. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) E1—E6 Pg79, Page 505 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Signiftant With Mitigation Than Significant No impact Incorporated trract Impact Design building to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets; dual flush toilets and waterless urinalstwater heaters. Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non- vegetated surfaces. 10) Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educate employees about reducing waste and about recycling. b) The project proposes to amend the General Plan land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial. and to amend the Zoning Map land use district from the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the General Commercial (GC) District for a 1.22 acre 2 -parcel site at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route and to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re- establish 'an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 square foot car wash on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue. Rev 4-17 No other applicable plans, policies, or regulations adopted forthe purpose of reducing GHG emission apply to the project. The 2010 General Plan Update includes adopted policies and Standard Conditions that respond to the Attorney General and the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA). The General Plan policies and Standard Conditions guide infill and sustainable development reliant on pedestrian connections, re- use and rehabilitation of existing structures, link transportation opportunities, promote development that is sensitive to natural resources and incentivizes denser mixed-use projects that maximizes diverse opportunities. The proposed project includes water efficient landscaping, shade trees, and walkways that provide accessibility to public sidewalks and therefore is consistent with the sustainability and climate change policies of the General Plan. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of GHG's and determined that GHG emissions would be cumulatively considerable, which would be a significant, unavoidable adverse cumulative impact. A Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. Based on the Air Quality & Climate Change Assessment (MIG Hogle-Ireland, August 2016), no significant impacts to GHGs from short-term, construction impacts or long-term, operational impacts would occur as a result of the project. Because the project would result in minimal emissions that do not exceed the SCAQMD's interim threshold of significance, the project's contribution to GHGs from short-term construction and long-term operational cumulative impacts is also considered minimal. With implementation of the mitigation measures listed in subsection a), less than significant impacts would occur as a result of the project. In addition, the proposed project would not hinder the State's GHG reduction goals established by AB 32 and therefore would be less than a significant impact. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) E1—E6 Pg79, Page 505 Initial Study for DRC2O15-00683, DRC2O15-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2O15-00681, DRC2O15-00682, DRC2O16-00831, and DRC2O17-00879 Page 32 due to greenhouse gases generated by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. 8. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the proyect: Less Than a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the O Significant Less (✓) Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially significant With MitigaVcn Than Significant No disposal of hazardous materials? Impact Incorporated Impact Impact due to greenhouse gases generated by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. 8. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the proyect: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the O O O (✓) environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () {✓} environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? C) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or O O O (✓) acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 114 mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of (} () (} {✓) hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (✓) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, () () (} (✓) would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an {) O O (✓) adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, O { } (} (✓) injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Comments: a) Development within the City may utilize or generate hazardous materials or wastes. This is usually associated with individual households, small business operations, and maintenance activities like paints, cleaning solvents, fertilizers, and motor oil or through construction activities that would use paints, solvents, acids, curing compounds, grease, and oils. These materials would be stored and used at individual sites. The project proposes to amend the General Pian land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and to amend the Zoning Map land use district from the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the General Commercial (GC) District for a 1.22 acre 2 -parcel site at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route and to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re-establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 square foot car wash on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District Rev 4-17 ,E1—E6 Pg8O Page 506 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 33 (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue. The project site is characterized by the Mulberry Early Education Center in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the north, a commercial center in the General Commercial (GC) District to the south, residential uses in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the east, and vacant land in the Office - Professional (OP) District to the west. As the project site is currently fully developed and proposed ground disturbance will be minimal and limited to the installation of new fuel tanks (the fuel tanks for the previous gas station were removed) and the installation of a 968 - square foot car wash building. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition, which is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the State. The City has an Emergency Operations Plan that meets State and Federal requirements and is in the process of updating the approved 2005 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less -than -significant. Therefore, no adverse impacts are expected. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs; 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN; 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) due to hazards caused, and/or waste materials generated by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. b) The proposed project includes the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition, which is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the State. The City has an Emergency Operations Plan that meets State and Federal requirements and is in the process of updating the approved 2005 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less -than -significant. Therefore, no adverse impacts are expected. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 proposes to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 proposes to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the General Commercial (GC) District for a 1.22 acre 2 -parcel site located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts to the westerly 0.70 -acre project site are addressed above. When applications for easterly 0.52 -acre project site are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) due to hazards caused, and/or waste materials generated by that project will be evaluated and, -if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. C) The project site is located within % mile of a sensitive receptor — a school directly north of the project site and residences that are to the north, south, east, and west of the site; however, the uses proposed do not create objectionable odors. According to the Air Quality and Climate Change Assessment prepared by MIG on August 2016, the proposed gas station and hypothetical commercial office/retail uses do not produce odors that could affect a substantial number of people. Fuel is stored in sealed, underground storage tanks Rev 4-17 E1—E6 Pg81 Page 507 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Signifcant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact incorporated Impact Impact (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue. The project site is characterized by the Mulberry Early Education Center in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the north, a commercial center in the General Commercial (GC) District to the south, residential uses in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the east, and vacant land in the Office - Professional (OP) District to the west. As the project site is currently fully developed and proposed ground disturbance will be minimal and limited to the installation of new fuel tanks (the fuel tanks for the previous gas station were removed) and the installation of a 968 - square foot car wash building. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition, which is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the State. The City has an Emergency Operations Plan that meets State and Federal requirements and is in the process of updating the approved 2005 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less -than -significant. Therefore, no adverse impacts are expected. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs; 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN; 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) due to hazards caused, and/or waste materials generated by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. b) The proposed project includes the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition, which is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the State. The City has an Emergency Operations Plan that meets State and Federal requirements and is in the process of updating the approved 2005 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less -than -significant. Therefore, no adverse impacts are expected. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 proposes to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 proposes to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the General Commercial (GC) District for a 1.22 acre 2 -parcel site located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts to the westerly 0.70 -acre project site are addressed above. When applications for easterly 0.52 -acre project site are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) due to hazards caused, and/or waste materials generated by that project will be evaluated and, -if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. C) The project site is located within % mile of a sensitive receptor — a school directly north of the project site and residences that are to the north, south, east, and west of the site; however, the uses proposed do not create objectionable odors. According to the Air Quality and Climate Change Assessment prepared by MIG on August 2016, the proposed gas station and hypothetical commercial office/retail uses do not produce odors that could affect a substantial number of people. Fuel is stored in sealed, underground storage tanks Rev 4-17 E1—E6 Pg81 Page 507 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 34 and pumps are equipped with emissions equipment designed to minimize evaporative loss. Considering the proposed gas station fuels are stored in a manner in which fumes are contained, odors from the project are not expected to affect a substantial number of people. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts:related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) due to hazards caused, and/or waste materials by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. d) The proposed project is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site. A site inspection in October 2017 did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials. Therefore, no impact is anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) due to hazards caused, and/or waste materials generated by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. . e) The site is located within an airport land use plan (the Ontario Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP)) according to the General Plan Figure PS -7 and. General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.8-1; however, the site is not within 2 miles of a public airport. The project site is located approximately 2.5 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. The project is compliant with the height limits of the ALUCP. Therefore, no impact is anticipated. f) There are no private airstrips within the City, The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 and 112 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. Therefore, no impact is anticipated. g) The City has a -developed roadway network that provides emergency access and evacuation routes to existing development. New development will be located on a site that has access to existing roadways. The City's Emergency Operation Plan, which is updated every 3 years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in the event of a disaster. Because the project includes at least two points of public street access and is required to comply with all applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances, no adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00884 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: Rev 4-17 E1—E6 Pg82 Page 508 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Slgnlficant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact !m act and pumps are equipped with emissions equipment designed to minimize evaporative loss. Considering the proposed gas station fuels are stored in a manner in which fumes are contained, odors from the project are not expected to affect a substantial number of people. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts:related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) due to hazards caused, and/or waste materials by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. d) The proposed project is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site. A site inspection in October 2017 did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials. Therefore, no impact is anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) due to hazards caused, and/or waste materials generated by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. . e) The site is located within an airport land use plan (the Ontario Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP)) according to the General Plan Figure PS -7 and. General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.8-1; however, the site is not within 2 miles of a public airport. The project site is located approximately 2.5 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. The project is compliant with the height limits of the ALUCP. Therefore, no impact is anticipated. f) There are no private airstrips within the City, The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 and 112 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. Therefore, no impact is anticipated. g) The City has a -developed roadway network that provides emergency access and evacuation routes to existing development. New development will be located on a site that has access to existing roadways. The City's Emergency Operation Plan, which is updated every 3 years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in the event of a disaster. Because the project includes at least two points of public street access and is required to comply with all applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances, no adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00884 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: Rev 4-17 E1—E6 Pg82 Page 508 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 35 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to emergency access plans and evacuation routes caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from wind -driven fires in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity zone found in the northern part of the City; however, the proposed project site is not located within a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone according to General Plan Figure PS -1. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 9. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project. Less Than a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge (} Significant Less ( ) Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant with Mitigation Than Significant No b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere Im acl Incorporated Impact Impact 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to emergency access plans and evacuation routes caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from wind -driven fires in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity zone found in the northern part of the City; however, the proposed project site is not located within a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone according to General Plan Figure PS -1. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 9. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project. a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge (} (✓) () ( ) requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere O O O (✓) substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? C) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the {) () (} (✓} site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the {) () (} (✓) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on- or off-site? e} Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed O O O (✓) the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? () {) () (✓) g) Place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area as () () () (✓) mapped on a Federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100 -year flood hazard area structures () () (✓) ( ) that would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, () () () (✓) injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? O (} (} (✓) Rev 4-17 E1—E6 Pg83 Page 509 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 36 Comments: a) Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD). The project is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems. The State of California is authorized to administer various aspects of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act. The General Construction Permit treats any construction activity over 1 acre as an industrial activity, requiring a permit under the State's General NPDES permit. The State Water Resource Control Board (SWRCB), through the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), Santa Ana Region, administers these permits. Construction activities covered under the State's General Construction permit include removal of vegetation, grading, excavating, or any other activity for new development or significant redevelopment. Prior to commencement of construction of a project, a discharger must submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to obtain coverage under the General Permit. The General Permit requires all dischargers to comply with the following during construction activities, including site clearance and grading: Develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that would specify Best Management Practices (BMPs) to prevent construction pollutants from contacting storm water and with the intent of keeping all products of erosion from moving off-site into receiving waters. Eliminate or reduce non -storm water discharges to storm sewer systems and other waters of the nation. Perform inspections of all BMPs. Waste discharges include discharges of storm water and construction project discharges. A construction project for new development or significant redevelopment requires an NPDES permit. Construction project proponents are required to prepare an SWPPP. To comply with the NPDES, the project's construction contractor will be required to prepare an SWPPP during construction activities, and a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for post -construction operational management of storm water runoff. The applicant has submitted a Site Drainage Plan (SPB Engineering, May 2017), which identifies BMPs to minimize the amount of pollutants, such as eroded soil and containment for fuel spills, entering the drainage system after construction. Runoff from driveways, roads and other impermeable surfaces must be controlled through an on-site drainage system. BMPs include both structural and non-structural control methods. Structural controls used to manage storm water pollutant levels include detention basins, oiVgrit separators, and porous pavement. Non-structural controls focus on controlling pollutants at the source, generally through implementing erosion and sediment control plans, and various Business Plans that must be developed by any businesses that store and use hazardous materials. Practices such as periodic parking lot sweeping can substantially reduce the amount of pollutants entering the storm drain system. The following mitigation measures are required to control additional storm water effluent: Construction Activities: Rev 4-17 �) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that E1 --E6 Pg84 Page 510 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than significant No Impact Inco orated Impact Impact Comments: a) Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD). The project is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems. The State of California is authorized to administer various aspects of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act. The General Construction Permit treats any construction activity over 1 acre as an industrial activity, requiring a permit under the State's General NPDES permit. The State Water Resource Control Board (SWRCB), through the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), Santa Ana Region, administers these permits. Construction activities covered under the State's General Construction permit include removal of vegetation, grading, excavating, or any other activity for new development or significant redevelopment. Prior to commencement of construction of a project, a discharger must submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to obtain coverage under the General Permit. The General Permit requires all dischargers to comply with the following during construction activities, including site clearance and grading: Develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that would specify Best Management Practices (BMPs) to prevent construction pollutants from contacting storm water and with the intent of keeping all products of erosion from moving off-site into receiving waters. Eliminate or reduce non -storm water discharges to storm sewer systems and other waters of the nation. Perform inspections of all BMPs. Waste discharges include discharges of storm water and construction project discharges. A construction project for new development or significant redevelopment requires an NPDES permit. Construction project proponents are required to prepare an SWPPP. To comply with the NPDES, the project's construction contractor will be required to prepare an SWPPP during construction activities, and a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for post -construction operational management of storm water runoff. The applicant has submitted a Site Drainage Plan (SPB Engineering, May 2017), which identifies BMPs to minimize the amount of pollutants, such as eroded soil and containment for fuel spills, entering the drainage system after construction. Runoff from driveways, roads and other impermeable surfaces must be controlled through an on-site drainage system. BMPs include both structural and non-structural control methods. Structural controls used to manage storm water pollutant levels include detention basins, oiVgrit separators, and porous pavement. Non-structural controls focus on controlling pollutants at the source, generally through implementing erosion and sediment control plans, and various Business Plans that must be developed by any businesses that store and use hazardous materials. Practices such as periodic parking lot sweeping can substantially reduce the amount of pollutants entering the storm drain system. The following mitigation measures are required to control additional storm water effluent: Construction Activities: Rev 4-17 �) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that E1 --E6 Pg84 Page 510 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 37 shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan/Site Drainage Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control PIan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods .experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 5) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (N01) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Post -Construction Operational. Rev 4-17 6) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Pian (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 7) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Pians for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. General Pian Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low E1—E6 Pg85 Page 511 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With significant Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan/Site Drainage Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control PIan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods .experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 5) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (N01) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Post -Construction Operational. Rev 4-17 6) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Pian (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 7) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Pians for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. General Pian Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low E1—E6 Pg85 Page 511 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 38 Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to water quality standards or waste discharge requirements caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. b) According to CVWD, approximately 35 percent of the City's water is currently provided from water supplies coming from the underlying Chino and Cucamonga Groundwater Basins, CVWD complies with its prescriptive water rights as managed by the Chino Basin Watermaster and will not deplete the local groundwater resource. The proposed project will not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will it interfere with recharge because it is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Figure RC -3. Development of the site will require the grading and excavation, but would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 300 to 470 feet below the ground surface, As noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.9), continued development citywide will increase water needs but will not be a significant impact. CVWD has plans to meet this increased need to the year 2030. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to groundwater supplies or groundwater recharge caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. C) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building" and hardscape proposed on the site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The project design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, the project will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) .District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to drainage patterns that results in erosion caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. d) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All Rev 4-17 E1 --E6 Pg86 Page 512 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impart Impact Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to water quality standards or waste discharge requirements caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. b) According to CVWD, approximately 35 percent of the City's water is currently provided from water supplies coming from the underlying Chino and Cucamonga Groundwater Basins, CVWD complies with its prescriptive water rights as managed by the Chino Basin Watermaster and will not deplete the local groundwater resource. The proposed project will not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will it interfere with recharge because it is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Figure RC -3. Development of the site will require the grading and excavation, but would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 300 to 470 feet below the ground surface, As noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.9), continued development citywide will increase water needs but will not be a significant impact. CVWD has plans to meet this increased need to the year 2030. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to groundwater supplies or groundwater recharge caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. C) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building" and hardscape proposed on the site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The project design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, the project will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) .District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to drainage patterns that results in erosion caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. d) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All Rev 4-17 E1 --E6 Pg86 Page 512 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 39 runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to drainage patterns that results in flooding caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. e) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, ail runoff will be conveyed to existing'storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The project will not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs; 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to existing or planned stormwater drainage systems caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. f) Grading activities associated with the construction period could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surface flows during a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in surface water quality impacts. The site is for new development/significant redevelopment; therefore, is required to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to minimize water pollution. With implementation of the mitigation measures specified under subsection a), less than significant impacts are anticipated. Rev 4-17 8) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Site Drainage Plan (SPB Engineering, May 2017) to reduce construction pollutants from entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When E1—E6 Pg87 Page 513 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Im act runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to drainage patterns that results in flooding caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. e) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, ail runoff will be conveyed to existing'storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The project will not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs; 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to existing or planned stormwater drainage systems caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. f) Grading activities associated with the construction period could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surface flows during a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in surface water quality impacts. The site is for new development/significant redevelopment; therefore, is required to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to minimize water pollution. With implementation of the mitigation measures specified under subsection a), less than significant impacts are anticipated. Rev 4-17 8) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Site Drainage Plan (SPB Engineering, May 2017) to reduce construction pollutants from entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When E1—E6 Pg87 Page 513 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 40 applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to housing due to flood hazards caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. g) No housing units are proposed with this project. The project site is located within a 100 - year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS -5. The project will be required to construct required storm drain facilities or payment of fees for storm drain system improvements. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to flood flow patterns caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. h) The project site is located within a 100 -year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS -5. All new construction is required to comply with the City's Floodplain Management Regulation which requires the implementation of various flood hazard reduction measures. Additionally, the project will be required to construct required storm drain facilities or payment of fees for storm drain system. improvements. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 4-17 General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to water quality caused by those projects caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm drain system designed to adequately convey floodwaters from a 100 -year storm event. The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete -fined channels, and underground storm drains as shown in General Plan Figure PS -6. All new construction is required to comply with the City's Floodplain Management Regulation which would ensure that future development would not impede or redirect floodwaters and would be adequately anchored to prevent flotation, collapse, or lateral movement of structures within the floodplain. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and E1—E6 Pg88 Page 514 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PotentiaiIy Signiricant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Inca orated Im act Impact applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to housing due to flood hazards caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. g) No housing units are proposed with this project. The project site is located within a 100 - year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS -5. The project will be required to construct required storm drain facilities or payment of fees for storm drain system improvements. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to flood flow patterns caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. h) The project site is located within a 100 -year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS -5. All new construction is required to comply with the City's Floodplain Management Regulation which requires the implementation of various flood hazard reduction measures. Additionally, the project will be required to construct required storm drain facilities or payment of fees for storm drain system. improvements. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 4-17 General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to water quality caused by those projects caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm drain system designed to adequately convey floodwaters from a 100 -year storm event. The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete -fined channels, and underground storm drains as shown in General Plan Figure PS -6. All new construction is required to comply with the City's Floodplain Management Regulation which would ensure that future development would not impede or redirect floodwaters and would be adequately anchored to prevent flotation, collapse, or lateral movement of structures within the floodplain. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and E1—E6 Pg88 Page 514 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 41 Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to water quality caused by those projects caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. j) There are no oceans, lakes, or reservoirs near the project site; therefore, impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated. The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams. Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non -significance within the City. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to water quality caused by those projects caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. 10. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? () Less Than () (✓} b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or O Significant Less (✓) Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially significant Wilh Mitigation Than Significant No (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific Impact Incorporated Impart Impact Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to water quality caused by those projects caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. j) There are no oceans, lakes, or reservoirs near the project site; therefore, impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated. The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams. Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non -significance within the City. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to water quality caused by those projects caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. 10. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? () {) () (✓} b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or O O {) (✓) regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or ' zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? G) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan () () () (✓) or natural community conservation plan? Comments: a) The project site is characterized by the Mulberry Early Education Center in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the north, a commercial center in the General Commercial (GC) District to the south, residential uses in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the east, and vacant land in the Office -Professional (OP) District to the west. The project proposes to amend the General Plan land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and to amend the Zoning Map land use district from the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the General Commercial (GC) District for a 1.22 acre 2 -parcel site at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route and to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re-establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 square foot car wash on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue. The project is designed consistent with the General Commercial (GC) District development standards and will include Rev 4-17 E1—E6 Pg89 Page 515 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 42 elements that are consistent with surrounding development, thus becoming a part of the larger community. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. b) The project site land use designation is Low Medium Residential, proposed General Commercial. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan and does not interfere with any policies for environmental protection, or SCAG's Regional Comprehensive Plan. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. C) The project site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area. According to General Plan Figure RC -4 and Section 4.10 of the General Plan FPEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources; therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the project is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 11. MINERAL. RESOURCES. Would the project: Less Than a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral (} Significant Less (✓} Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentialiy Signifieenl With Mitigation 11rcarporated Than Significant No residents of the State? Impact Impact Imt acl elements that are consistent with surrounding development, thus becoming a part of the larger community. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. b) The project site land use designation is Low Medium Residential, proposed General Commercial. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan and does not interfere with any policies for environmental protection, or SCAG's Regional Comprehensive Plan. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. C) The project site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area. According to General Plan Figure RC -4 and Section 4.10 of the General Plan FPEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources; therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the project is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 11. MINERAL. RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral (} {) () (✓} resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important () () () (✓) mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local () () {) (✓) general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? Comments: a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure RC -2 and Table RC -1. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. b) The site is not designated by the General Plan, Figure RC -2 and Table RC -1, as a valuable mineral resource recovery site. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 12. NOISE. Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in () (✓) {) ( ) excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive () () {) (✓) ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels? C) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise () () () (✓) levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient () (✓) () ( ) noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? Rev 4-17 E1 --E6 Pg90 Page 516 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, °DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 43 Less Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Less Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant Na Impart Incorporated Impact Impact e) For a project located within an airport and use plan or, () {) {) (✓) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, () () () (✓) would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Comments: a) The project site is within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to General Plan Figures PS -9 and PS -10. The project site is characterized by the Mulberry Early Education Center in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the north, a commercial center in the General Commercial (GC) District to the south, residential uses in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the east, and vacant land in the Office - Professional (OP) District to the west. The project proposes to amend the General Plan land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and to amend the Zoning Map land use district from the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the General Commercial (GC) District for a 1.22 acre 2 -parcel site at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route and to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re-establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 square foot car wash on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue. Rev 4-17 Due to the proximity of the site to both Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route a Noise Study (MIG Hogle-Ireland, August 2016) was prepared for the project site. According to the model used in the Noise Study, temporary noise increases during construction of the proposed gas station and the retail use will be greatest during the demolition and grading phases. The model indicates that graders, tractors, and dozers could expose the single family residential use located approximately 222 feet to the east of the center of the gas station site (APN: 0208-291-05) to a combined noise level of 76.6 dBA during construction of the proposed gas station and a combined noise level of 85.0 dBA during construction of the hypothetical retail use. Because noise levels during construction are anticipated to exceed the City's standard of 65 dBA at the residential receptors and 70 dBA at the commercial and school receptors, mitigation measures will be necessary to reduce the impacts. With the implementation of identified mitigation measures below and in 12.d, construction noise will be reduced to unsubstantial levels and no substantial impact will occur. For operational impacts the report identified that the increase in vehicular traffic on Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route due to the proposed project will not result in noise levels exceeding the 65 dBA standard established by the City for residential use and 70 dBA for commercial uses and will not result in a perceptible noise increase. Therefore, no substantial impacts will occur. Noise levels from operation of the proposed carwash was also modeled to determine the level of impact to the residential use to the east and the school to the north. Dryers at the carwash exit can generate noise levels of up to 100 dBA. The proposed project includes an existing 6 -foot concrete wall along the northern and eastern boundaries of the site. According to the modeling, the residential use to the east of the project site could be exposed to temporary noise levels of 48.9 dBA and the E1—E6 Pg91 Page 517 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 44 Rev 4-17 school located to the north of the project site could be exposed to temporary noise levels of 30.2 dBA when cars exit the car wash. Noise related to operation of the carwash will be within acceptable levels for residential and school uses. No substantial impacts will occur Therefore, based on the information provided in the Noise Analysis, the proposed project would not expose people to or generate noise levels in excess of the standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies. With the following standard mitigation measures and special mitigation measures, the noise impacts on the project will be less than significant. Exterior. - Prior to the issuance of any grading plans or building plans, the applicant shall submit a construction -related noise mitigation plan for Planning Director review and approval. This plan shall depict the location of construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction of the project. 2) Business operations shall maintain a noise level at 60dB or less during the hours of 10 p.m. until 7 a.m. No loading and unloading activities including opening, closing, or other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials, garbage cans, or other similar objects between the hours of 10 p.m..and 7 a.m. in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to residential areas. 3) During all project site excavation and grading, the project contractors shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers consistent with the manufacturers' standards. 4) The project contractor shall place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors nearest the project site. 6) The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction -related noise sources and noise -sensitive receptors nearest the project site during all project construction. 6) The construction contractor shall obtain the City's approval for its haul plan, with the planned haul truck routes avoiding residential areas to the exterit feasible. 7) The construction contractor shall change the timing and/or sequence of the noisiest construction operations to avoid sensitive times of the day. 8) During construction, the contractor shall ensure all. construction equipment is equipped with appropriate noise attenuating devices. 9) Idling equipment shall be turned off when not in use. 10) Equipment shall be maintained so that vehicles and their loads are secured from rattling and banging. E1 --E6 Pg92 Page 518 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Rev 4-17 school located to the north of the project site could be exposed to temporary noise levels of 30.2 dBA when cars exit the car wash. Noise related to operation of the carwash will be within acceptable levels for residential and school uses. No substantial impacts will occur Therefore, based on the information provided in the Noise Analysis, the proposed project would not expose people to or generate noise levels in excess of the standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies. With the following standard mitigation measures and special mitigation measures, the noise impacts on the project will be less than significant. Exterior. - Prior to the issuance of any grading plans or building plans, the applicant shall submit a construction -related noise mitigation plan for Planning Director review and approval. This plan shall depict the location of construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction of the project. 2) Business operations shall maintain a noise level at 60dB or less during the hours of 10 p.m. until 7 a.m. No loading and unloading activities including opening, closing, or other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials, garbage cans, or other similar objects between the hours of 10 p.m..and 7 a.m. in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to residential areas. 3) During all project site excavation and grading, the project contractors shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers consistent with the manufacturers' standards. 4) The project contractor shall place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors nearest the project site. 6) The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction -related noise sources and noise -sensitive receptors nearest the project site during all project construction. 6) The construction contractor shall obtain the City's approval for its haul plan, with the planned haul truck routes avoiding residential areas to the exterit feasible. 7) The construction contractor shall change the timing and/or sequence of the noisiest construction operations to avoid sensitive times of the day. 8) During construction, the contractor shall ensure all. construction equipment is equipped with appropriate noise attenuating devices. 9) Idling equipment shall be turned off when not in use. 10) Equipment shall be maintained so that vehicles and their loads are secured from rattling and banging. E1 --E6 Pg92 Page 518 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 45 General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) due to increased ambient noise levels caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. b) The normal operating uses associated with this type of project normally do not induce ground borne vibrations. Construction related vibration may create short term noise and vibration impacts. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to Genera[ Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) due to excessive ground borne vibration or noise caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. C) The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic. The proposed project proposes to amend the General Plan land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and to amend the Zoning Map land use district from the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the General Commercial (GC) District for a 1.22 acre 2 -parcel site at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route and to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re- establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 square foot car wash on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue. Because the project will not significantly increase traffic as analyzed in Section 16 Transportation/Traffic; it will likely not increase ambient noise levels within the vicinity of the project. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) due to increased ambient noise levels caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. d) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.12) indicates that during a construction phase, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction equipment, will generate noise exceeding City standards, The following measures are provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts: Rev 4-17 E1—E6 Pg93 Page 519 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially significant With Nlitigalien Than Significant NC) Impact Incorporated 1m act Impact General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) due to increased ambient noise levels caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. b) The normal operating uses associated with this type of project normally do not induce ground borne vibrations. Construction related vibration may create short term noise and vibration impacts. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to Genera[ Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) due to excessive ground borne vibration or noise caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. C) The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic. The proposed project proposes to amend the General Plan land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and to amend the Zoning Map land use district from the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the General Commercial (GC) District for a 1.22 acre 2 -parcel site at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route and to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re- establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 square foot car wash on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue. Because the project will not significantly increase traffic as analyzed in Section 16 Transportation/Traffic; it will likely not increase ambient noise levels within the vicinity of the project. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) due to increased ambient noise levels caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. d) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.12) indicates that during a construction phase, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction equipment, will generate noise exceeding City standards, The following measures are provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts: Rev 4-17 E1—E6 Pg93 Page 519 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 46 11) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 12) Prior to issuance of grading or building permits, the applicant shall submit evidence of noise control measures that include 1) vibratory pile drivers or other pile driving noise controls, 2) temporary sound curtains at least 8 feet tall placed around all noise producing equipment, and 3) fitting appropriate mufflers that achieve a minimum 20 dBA reduction in construction -related noise levels. 13) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise IeveI monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050. Monitoring at other times maybe required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. The preceding mitigation measures will reduce the disturbance created by on-site construction equipment but do not address the potential impacts because of the transport of construction materials and debris. The following mitigation measures shall then be required: 14) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes and include appropriate noise mitigation measures. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-D5 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) due to substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport. The Project is located approximately 2.5 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 4-17 E1 --E6 Pg94 Page 520 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentialky Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact incorporated Impact Impact 11) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 12) Prior to issuance of grading or building permits, the applicant shall submit evidence of noise control measures that include 1) vibratory pile drivers or other pile driving noise controls, 2) temporary sound curtains at least 8 feet tall placed around all noise producing equipment, and 3) fitting appropriate mufflers that achieve a minimum 20 dBA reduction in construction -related noise levels. 13) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise IeveI monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050. Monitoring at other times maybe required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. The preceding mitigation measures will reduce the disturbance created by on-site construction equipment but do not address the potential impacts because of the transport of construction materials and debris. The following mitigation measures shall then be required: 14) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes and include appropriate noise mitigation measures. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-D5 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) due to substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport. The Project is located approximately 2.5 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 4-17 E1 --E6 Pg94 Page 520 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 47 f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 112 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 13. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project. Less Than a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either () Significant Less (✓) Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially significant With Mitigation Than Significant No businesses) or indirectly (for example, through Impact Incorporated Im act Im net f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 112 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 13. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project. a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either () { } () (✓) directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, () () () (✓) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? C) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating () () () (✓) the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Comments: a) The project is located in a predominantly developed area and will not induce population growth. Construction activities at the site will be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area. Once constructed, the proposed project will have a limited number of employees; hence, will not create a demand for additional housing as a majority of the employees will likely be hired from within the City or surrounding communities. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) due to population growth levels caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. b) The project site contains an existing service station and fuel canopy and there are no housing units on the property. Therefore, no adverse impact is expected. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs. 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to existing housing caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. C) The project site contains an existing service station and fuel canopy and there are no housing units on the property. Therefore, no adverse impact is expected. Rev 4-17 General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map P1 --P6 Pg95 Page 521 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 48 Amendment DR02015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN:' 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. 14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial Less Than adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Signi$cent With Mitigation Than Significant No physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of Impact Incorporated Impact Im act Amendment DR02015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN:' 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. 14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: a) Fire protection? () () () (✓) b) Police protection? () () () (✓) C) Schools? {) (} () {✓) d) Parks? 0 () (✓) e) Other public facilities? () () () (✓) Comments: a) The project site, located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, would be served by Fire Station #174 at 11297 Jersey Boulevard, located approximately 2.4 miles from the project site. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the project to lessen the future demand and impacts to fire services. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and .Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-06 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to fire protection services caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. b) Additional police protection is not required as the addition of the project will not change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled as the project site is within an area that is regularly patrolled. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 4-17 General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: E1 --E6 Pg96 Page 522 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 49 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) due to police protection services caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. C) The site is in a developed area currently served by the Cucamonga School District and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District. The project will be required to pay School Fees as prescribed by State law prior to the issuance of building permits. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to schools caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. d) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park, Bear Gulch Park located at 9094 Arrow Route, is located approximately 0.7 miles west of the project site. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to parks caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. e) The proposed project will utilize existing public facilities. The site is in a developing area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services. According to the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.14), there will be a projected increase in library space demand but with the implementation of standard conditions the increase in Library Services would be mitigated to less than significant impact. Additionally, the Paul A. Biane Library has an additional 14,000 square foot shell of vacant library space that is planned for future Library use. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 4-17 E1—E6 Pg97 Page 523 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With Ml igation Than Significant No Impart Incorporated Impact Impact 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) due to police protection services caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. C) The site is in a developed area currently served by the Cucamonga School District and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District. The project will be required to pay School Fees as prescribed by State law prior to the issuance of building permits. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to schools caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. d) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park, Bear Gulch Park located at 9094 Arrow Route, is located approximately 0.7 miles west of the project site. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to parks caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. e) The proposed project will utilize existing public facilities. The site is in a developing area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services. According to the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.14), there will be a projected increase in library space demand but with the implementation of standard conditions the increase in Library Services would be mitigated to less than significant impact. Additionally, the Paul A. Biane Library has an additional 14,000 square foot shell of vacant library space that is planned for future Library use. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 4-17 E1—E6 Pg97 Page 523 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 50 General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2016-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to other public facilities caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. 15. RECREATION. Would the project. Less Than a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional (} Significant Less (✓) Issues and Supporting information Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than significant No substantial physical deterioration of the facility would Impact Incorporated Impact Impact General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2016-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to other public facilities caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. 15. RECREATION. Would the project. a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional (} () () (✓) parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require (} () () (✓) the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Comments: a) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park, Bear Gulch Park located at 9094 Arrow Route, is located approximately 0.7 miles west of the project site. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to recreational facilities caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. b) The project does not include the development of new or the expansion of existing recreational facilities. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 16. TRANS PO RTATIONITRAFFI C. Would the project.- roject.a) a)Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy () () () {✓) establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non -motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? Rev 4-17 E1 --E6 Pg98 Page 524 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 51 b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management (} Less Than () (✓) program, including, but not limited to a level of service Significant Less Inhaurd Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant Wth Miligaticn Than Significant No standards established by the county congestion Impact Incorporated Impact Impact b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management (} {) () (✓) program, including, but not limited to a level of service &.en Peak Hovr 0;ilv Inhaurd standards and travel demand measures, or other Total Ineeund Gut'o ,d Tetml standards established by the county congestion 1 FP ME 916 CO.] management agency for designated roads or 11.82 7.07 6-79 15fi4 highways? Tr. ;Genera�id Gae St¢tian with Cors•r, Iharket3Car Yf;zA P= ­By Trip Reduraon r6 r' A..M.54': PW)' B rP ifE 915 C) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either O O O (✓) an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that 1.221 -12L Het Pnaject Trip; Ge ted 18 18 result in substantial safety risks? 25 21 491 1,102 d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature () () () (✓) (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? () () () (✓) f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs () () () {✓} regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities? Comments: a) The proposed project is located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, The project proposes to amend the General Plan land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and to amend the Zoning Map land use district from the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the General Commercial (GC) District for a 1.22 acre 2 -parcel site at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route and to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re- establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 square foot car wash on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue. The project site is characterized by the Mulberry Early Education Center in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the north, a commercial center in the General Commercial (GC) District to the south, residential uses in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the east, and vacant land in the Office -Professional (OP) District to the west. The proposed project is forecast to generate 1,102 daily trips, with 95 trips in the a.m. peak hour (36 net new trips), and 111 trips in the p.m. peak hour (49 net new trips) (Kuzman Associates, May 2017), as shown in the following table: Rev 4-17 Prcie" Trip Generation L -rd L-- 01128 y IFn t.t Mp G.rensl nRc,.fDip; Ger n: d SoLmcl I.foncin� Peak Hwr &.en Peak Hovr 0;ilv Inhaurd Oabmo d Total Ineeund Gut'o ,d Tetml no Gereaion Ratc GaaS:ationwid,Canv.l:uket&Car Wash 1 FP ME 916 CO.] 5.80 11.82 7.07 6-79 15fi4 15187 Tr. ;Genera�id Gae St¢tian with Cors•r, Iharket3Car Yf;zA P= ­By Trip Reduraon r6 r' A..M.54': PW)' B rP ifE 915 da •30 -17 •29 95 -59-12 57 5.1 -30 11t -62 1.221 -12L Het Pnaject Trip; Ge ted 18 18 36 25 21 491 1,102 Under existing conditions, the Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route intersection operates at satisfactory LOS C or better during the AM and PM peak hours. Under the existing E1—E6 Pg99 Page 525 Initial Study for ORC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 52 Rev 4-17 condition plus project year scenario, the Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route intersection operates satisfactorily at LOS C or in the AM peak hour and LOS D in the PM peak hour. The City Engineer reviewed the Traffic Impact Study submitted for the project and concurs with the report's findings that the project will have no significant impact. Existing Levels of Service (LOS) Existing Intersection Delay and Level of Service intersection TrafftC Control' Less Than Peak Hour Delay -LOS' Northbound Southbound Eastbound Signifcanl Less L T R Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than significant No F TS Impact Incar crated Impact !m act Rev 4-17 condition plus project year scenario, the Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route intersection operates satisfactorily at LOS C or in the AM peak hour and LOS D in the PM peak hour. The City Engineer reviewed the Traffic Impact Study submitted for the project and concurs with the report's findings that the project will have no significant impact. Existing Levels of Service (LOS) Existing Intersection Delay and Level of Service intersection TrafftC Control' Intersection Approach Lanes` Peak Hour Delay -LOS' Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound L T R L T R L T R L T R Morning I Everting Archibald Avenue (NS) at. Arrovr Route (EW] - 42 F TS 1 2 d 1 1.5 1 1 1.5 0,5 1 2 d 28.9•C 33.3-C Existing Plus Pro'ect Levels of Service LOS Existing Plus Project Intersection Delay and Level of Service The project is in an area that is mostly developed with street improvements existing or included in project design. The project will not create a substantial increase in the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume, or congestion at intersections. The project site will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per City roadway standards. In addition,: the City has established a Transportation Development fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to,issuance of building permits. Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to the performance of the transportation/traffic circulation system caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. E1 --E6 Pg100 Page 526 Intersection Approach Lanes` Peak Hour Plorthbound Scuthbound Eastbound WETftund Traffic Delay-LDSI Inrersection Cnntrola L T R L T R L T R L T P. Morning Evening Archibald Avenue (NS) at: Project Driveway (E47)- 91 CSS 0 1.5 0.5 1 2 0 0 0 0 0.5 D 0.5 15.4-C 29.0.0 Arrow Route (EW) - tt2 TS I 1 2 d 1 1 13 1 1 1.5 D.5 1 2 d 29.1-C 33.7-C Project Di (PFS) at 1 1 1 Arrau: Route EW -t 3 CSS 0 0 D OS 0 0.5 0.5 1.5 0 D 1.5 0.5 24.3-C I 32.2-D The project is in an area that is mostly developed with street improvements existing or included in project design. The project will not create a substantial increase in the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume, or congestion at intersections. The project site will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per City roadway standards. In addition,: the City has established a Transportation Development fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to,issuance of building permits. Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to the performance of the transportation/traffic circulation system caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. E1 --E6 Pg100 Page 526 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 53 b) In November 2004, San Bernardino County voters passed the Measure 1 extension which requires local jurisdictions to impose appropriate fees on development for their fair share toward regional transportation improvement projects. On May 18, 2005, the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted a Comprehensive Transportation Fee Schedule updating these development impact fees. As a result, the San Bernardino County Congestion Management Agency waived the Congestion Management Plan (CMP) Traffic Impact Analysis reporting requirement. This project will be required, as a condition of approval, to pay the adopted transportation development fee prior to issuance of building permit. The project is in an area that is mostly developed with all street improvements existing. The project will not negatively impact the level of service standards on adjacent arterials. The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is,a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to a congestion management program caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. C) Located approximately 2.5 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to air traffic patterns caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. d) The project is in an area that is mostly developed with commercial and residential developments. The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. The project design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming uses. The project will, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards because of a design feature, Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 4-17 General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) E1 --E6 Pg101 Page 527 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impart Incorporated Impact Impact b) In November 2004, San Bernardino County voters passed the Measure 1 extension which requires local jurisdictions to impose appropriate fees on development for their fair share toward regional transportation improvement projects. On May 18, 2005, the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted a Comprehensive Transportation Fee Schedule updating these development impact fees. As a result, the San Bernardino County Congestion Management Agency waived the Congestion Management Plan (CMP) Traffic Impact Analysis reporting requirement. This project will be required, as a condition of approval, to pay the adopted transportation development fee prior to issuance of building permit. The project is in an area that is mostly developed with all street improvements existing. The project will not negatively impact the level of service standards on adjacent arterials. The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is,a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to a congestion management program caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. C) Located approximately 2.5 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to air traffic patterns caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. d) The project is in an area that is mostly developed with commercial and residential developments. The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. The project design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming uses. The project will, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards because of a design feature, Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 4-17 General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) E1 --E6 Pg101 Page 527 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 54 of transportation design features associated with those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. e) The project will be designed to provide access for all emergency vehicles during construction and upon completion of the project and will therefore not create an inadequate emergency access. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to emergency access caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. f) The proposed project is located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. The project proposes to amend the General Plan land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and to amend the Zoning Map land use district from the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the General Commercial (GC) District for a 1.22 acre 2 -parcel site at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route and to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re- establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 square foot car wash on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue. The project site is characterized by the Mulberry Early Education Center in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the north, a commercial center in the General Commercial (GC) District to the south, residential uses in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the east, and vacant land in the Office -Professional (OP) District to the west. The project design provides typical features to support transportation including local infrastructure (e.g., streets, sidewalks, and traffic/pedestrian signals), level topography, supporting transportation, and vehicle trip reduction. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 4-17 General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. E1 --E6 Pg102 Page 528 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With MiGgalicn Than Significant No Import Incorporated Impact Im act of transportation design features associated with those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. e) The project will be designed to provide access for all emergency vehicles during construction and upon completion of the project and will therefore not create an inadequate emergency access. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to emergency access caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. f) The proposed project is located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. The project proposes to amend the General Plan land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and to amend the Zoning Map land use district from the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the General Commercial (GC) District for a 1.22 acre 2 -parcel site at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route and to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re- establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 square foot car wash on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue. The project site is characterized by the Mulberry Early Education Center in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the north, a commercial center in the General Commercial (GC) District to the south, residential uses in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the east, and vacant land in the Office -Professional (OP) District to the west. The project design provides typical features to support transportation including local infrastructure (e.g., streets, sidewalks, and traffic/pedestrian signals), level topography, supporting transportation, and vehicle trip reduction. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 4-17 General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. E1 --E6 Pg102 Page 528 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC20.16-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 55 17. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code Section 29074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with the cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is: a) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of (} O O (✓) Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code Section 5020.1(K), or b) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its () (✓) (} ( } discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe. Comments: a) As defined in Public Resources Code 21074 and applying the criteria located in Public Resources Code Section 5024.1(c), the project site has not been identified as a "Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2.24 (Historic Preservation). A Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment (MIG Hogle-Ireland, 2016) was performed on the project site. In conjunction with the South Central Coastal Information Center at California State University, Fullerton, the California Historical Resources Information was also consulted. The cultural resources records search indicated that there were no historic resources within the Study Area and none were identified during the pedestrian survey. The cultural resources records search identified a total of 3 cultural resource investigations that have been conducted within a 1 -mile radius of the project site; these include three built -environment resources. The three build environments have been classified as residential homes; none of these are eligible for listing in either the National Register or the California Register due to room additions, alterations, and extensive remodeling. These historic resources will not be impacted by the proposed project. Rev 4-17 The study also included consultation with Native American Heritage Commission and a requested review of the Sacred Lands Files to determine if any recorded Native American sacred sites or locations of religious or ceremonial importance are present within one mile of the project site. The NAHC SLF records search results revealed that there are no known "Native American cultural resources" in the SLF database within the Study Area. As per NAHC suggested procedure, follow-up letters were sent via certified mail on October 13, 2015 to the 8 Native American individuals and organizations identified by the NAHC as being affiliated with the vicinity of the Study Area to request any additional information they may have about Native American cultural resources that may be affected by the proposed project. As of November 9, 2015, the consultant had received 1 response concerning the proposed project. The Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians -- Kizh Nation requested that at least 1 Native American Monitor be present during all ground disturbing activities within the project area. No other responses from the Native American community concerning the proposed project were received. The study concludes with the absence of E1—E6 Pg103 Page 529 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentialiy significant Impact With Mitigation Incorporated Than Significant Im act No Impact 17. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code Section 29074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with the cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is: a) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of (} O O (✓) Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code Section 5020.1(K), or b) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its () (✓) (} ( } discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe. Comments: a) As defined in Public Resources Code 21074 and applying the criteria located in Public Resources Code Section 5024.1(c), the project site has not been identified as a "Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2.24 (Historic Preservation). A Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment (MIG Hogle-Ireland, 2016) was performed on the project site. In conjunction with the South Central Coastal Information Center at California State University, Fullerton, the California Historical Resources Information was also consulted. The cultural resources records search indicated that there were no historic resources within the Study Area and none were identified during the pedestrian survey. The cultural resources records search identified a total of 3 cultural resource investigations that have been conducted within a 1 -mile radius of the project site; these include three built -environment resources. The three build environments have been classified as residential homes; none of these are eligible for listing in either the National Register or the California Register due to room additions, alterations, and extensive remodeling. These historic resources will not be impacted by the proposed project. Rev 4-17 The study also included consultation with Native American Heritage Commission and a requested review of the Sacred Lands Files to determine if any recorded Native American sacred sites or locations of religious or ceremonial importance are present within one mile of the project site. The NAHC SLF records search results revealed that there are no known "Native American cultural resources" in the SLF database within the Study Area. As per NAHC suggested procedure, follow-up letters were sent via certified mail on October 13, 2015 to the 8 Native American individuals and organizations identified by the NAHC as being affiliated with the vicinity of the Study Area to request any additional information they may have about Native American cultural resources that may be affected by the proposed project. As of November 9, 2015, the consultant had received 1 response concerning the proposed project. The Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians -- Kizh Nation requested that at least 1 Native American Monitor be present during all ground disturbing activities within the project area. No other responses from the Native American community concerning the proposed project were received. The study concludes with the absence of E1—E6 Pg103 Page 529 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 56 cultural resources in the current project area and surrounding vicinity, no additional cultural work is recommended. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: D208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to historical resources caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. b) In conformance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5, a Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment (MIG Hogle-Ireland, 2016) was performed on the project site. In conjunction with the South Central Coastal Information Center at California State University, Fullerton, the California Historical Resources Information was also consulted. The cultural resources records search indicated that there were no historic resources within the Study Area and none were identified during the pedestrian survey. The cultural resources records search identified a total of 3 cultural resource investigations that have been conducted within a 1 - mile radius of the project site; these include three built -environment resources. Rev 4.17 No potentially significant cultural resources were identified during the cultural resource survey of the project area. In the event that potentially significant archaeological materials are encountered during project related construction activities, all work must be halted in the vicinity of the archaeological discovery until a qualified archaeologist can visit the site of discovery and assess the significance of the archaeological resource. As well, Health and Safety Code 7050.5, CEQA 15064.5(e), and Public Resources Code 5097.98 mandate the process to be followed in the unlikely event of an accidental discovery of any human remains in a location other than a dedicated cemetery. As required by Senate Bill 18 (SB 18), the City submitted Tribal Consultation Requests for General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 to the Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians, the San Manual Band of Mission Indians, the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation, the Gabrieleno/Tongva Nation, and the Gabriel e nofTongva San Gabriel Band of Mission Indians. The notices were mailed on August 25, 2015 and provided for a 90 -day comment period ending on November 23, 2015. Of the 5 tribes who were notified, none submitted a response requesting consultation during the notification period. As required by Assembly Bill 52 (AB 52), the City submitted Tribal Consultation Requests to the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation, the Moron go Band of Mission Indians, Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians, the San Manual Band of Mission Indians, the San Gabriel Band of Mission Indians, and the Torres Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians following a completeness determination for Design Review DRC2016-00682. The notices were mailed on February 14, 2018 and provided for a 30 -day comment period ending on March 19, 2018. Responses were received from two tribes: the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians (SMBMI) and the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation (GBMI-KN). The SMBMI did not request consultation, but did request that specific conditions related to funerary objects, cultural resources, and historical resources discovered during ground disturbing activities be addressed. Applicable mitigation measures are included below. The GBMI-KN requested consultation, which was held on March 21, 2018, and their comments are included in the mitigation measures below. El —E6 Pg 104 Page 530 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Poleritially significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Im act cultural resources in the current project area and surrounding vicinity, no additional cultural work is recommended. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: D208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to historical resources caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. b) In conformance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5, a Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment (MIG Hogle-Ireland, 2016) was performed on the project site. In conjunction with the South Central Coastal Information Center at California State University, Fullerton, the California Historical Resources Information was also consulted. The cultural resources records search indicated that there were no historic resources within the Study Area and none were identified during the pedestrian survey. The cultural resources records search identified a total of 3 cultural resource investigations that have been conducted within a 1 - mile radius of the project site; these include three built -environment resources. Rev 4.17 No potentially significant cultural resources were identified during the cultural resource survey of the project area. In the event that potentially significant archaeological materials are encountered during project related construction activities, all work must be halted in the vicinity of the archaeological discovery until a qualified archaeologist can visit the site of discovery and assess the significance of the archaeological resource. As well, Health and Safety Code 7050.5, CEQA 15064.5(e), and Public Resources Code 5097.98 mandate the process to be followed in the unlikely event of an accidental discovery of any human remains in a location other than a dedicated cemetery. As required by Senate Bill 18 (SB 18), the City submitted Tribal Consultation Requests for General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 to the Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians, the San Manual Band of Mission Indians, the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation, the Gabrieleno/Tongva Nation, and the Gabriel e nofTongva San Gabriel Band of Mission Indians. The notices were mailed on August 25, 2015 and provided for a 90 -day comment period ending on November 23, 2015. Of the 5 tribes who were notified, none submitted a response requesting consultation during the notification period. As required by Assembly Bill 52 (AB 52), the City submitted Tribal Consultation Requests to the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation, the Moron go Band of Mission Indians, Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians, the San Manual Band of Mission Indians, the San Gabriel Band of Mission Indians, and the Torres Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians following a completeness determination for Design Review DRC2016-00682. The notices were mailed on February 14, 2018 and provided for a 30 -day comment period ending on March 19, 2018. Responses were received from two tribes: the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians (SMBMI) and the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation (GBMI-KN). The SMBMI did not request consultation, but did request that specific conditions related to funerary objects, cultural resources, and historical resources discovered during ground disturbing activities be addressed. Applicable mitigation measures are included below. The GBMI-KN requested consultation, which was held on March 21, 2018, and their comments are included in the mitigation measures below. El —E6 Pg 104 Page 530 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 57 Rev 4-17 Should any undocumented archaeological or cultural resources be discovered during ground disturbing activities, adherence to the mitigation measures listed below will ensure that all impacts will be less than significant. 1) The applicant shall contact the GBMI-KN and the SMBMI to discuss Tribal Monitoring of the project during all ground disturbing activities, and any trenching below the initial grade level, to ensure that cultural resources that may be encountered during ground disturbances are protected and preserved for study. The monitor(s) must be approved by the Tribal Representatives and will be present on-site during ground disturbing activities. The Native American Monitor(s) will complete monitoring logs on a daily basis. The logs will provide descriptions of the daily activities, including construction activities, locations, soil, and any cultural materials identified. In addition, the monitor(s) will be required to provide insurance certificates, including liability insurance, for any archaeological resource(s) encountered during grading and excavation activities pertinent to the provisions outlined in the California Environmental Quality Act, California Public Resources Code Division 13, and Section 21083.2 (a) through (k). The on-site monitoring shall end when the project site grading and excavation activities are completed, or when the Tribal Representatives and monitor have indicated that the site has a low potential for archeological resources. The applicant shall submit the results of these consultations to the City prior to issuance of grading permits for the project site. 2) In the event that human remains or funerary objects are encountered during any activities associated with the project, work in the immediate vicinity (within a 100 -foot buffer of the find) shall cease and the County Coroner shall be contacted pursuant to State Health and Safety Code §7050.5, and that code shall be enforced for the duration of the project. Prior to the start of ground disturbing activities, the Iand owner shall arrange a designated site location within the footprint of the project for the respectful reburial of the human remains and/or ceremonial objects. Any discoveries of human skeletal material shall be immediately reported to the County Coroner. The monitor will then notify the Qualified Archaeologist and the construction manager who will call the coroner. Work will continue to be diverted while the coroner determines whether the remains are Native American. The discovery is to be kept confidential and secure to prevent any further disturbance. If Native American, the coroner will notify the NAHC as mandated by state law who will then appoint a Most Likely Descendent. In the case where discovered human remains cannot be fully documented and recovered on the same day, the remains will be covered with muslin cloth and a steel plate that can be moved by heavy -equipment placed over the excavation opening to protect the remains. If this type of steel plate is not available, a tet -hour guard should be posted outside of working hours. The Tribe(s) will make every effort to recommend diverting the project and keeping the remains in situ and protected. If the project cannot be diverted, -it may be determined that burials will be removed. The Tribe(s) will work closely with the Qualified Archaeologist to ensure that the excavation is treated carefully, ethically, and respectfully. If data recovery is approved by the Tribe(s), documentation shall be taken which includes at a minimum. detailed descriptive notes and sketches. Additional types of documentation E1—E6 Pg105 Page 531 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated tmpact Impact Rev 4-17 Should any undocumented archaeological or cultural resources be discovered during ground disturbing activities, adherence to the mitigation measures listed below will ensure that all impacts will be less than significant. 1) The applicant shall contact the GBMI-KN and the SMBMI to discuss Tribal Monitoring of the project during all ground disturbing activities, and any trenching below the initial grade level, to ensure that cultural resources that may be encountered during ground disturbances are protected and preserved for study. The monitor(s) must be approved by the Tribal Representatives and will be present on-site during ground disturbing activities. The Native American Monitor(s) will complete monitoring logs on a daily basis. The logs will provide descriptions of the daily activities, including construction activities, locations, soil, and any cultural materials identified. In addition, the monitor(s) will be required to provide insurance certificates, including liability insurance, for any archaeological resource(s) encountered during grading and excavation activities pertinent to the provisions outlined in the California Environmental Quality Act, California Public Resources Code Division 13, and Section 21083.2 (a) through (k). The on-site monitoring shall end when the project site grading and excavation activities are completed, or when the Tribal Representatives and monitor have indicated that the site has a low potential for archeological resources. The applicant shall submit the results of these consultations to the City prior to issuance of grading permits for the project site. 2) In the event that human remains or funerary objects are encountered during any activities associated with the project, work in the immediate vicinity (within a 100 -foot buffer of the find) shall cease and the County Coroner shall be contacted pursuant to State Health and Safety Code §7050.5, and that code shall be enforced for the duration of the project. Prior to the start of ground disturbing activities, the Iand owner shall arrange a designated site location within the footprint of the project for the respectful reburial of the human remains and/or ceremonial objects. Any discoveries of human skeletal material shall be immediately reported to the County Coroner. The monitor will then notify the Qualified Archaeologist and the construction manager who will call the coroner. Work will continue to be diverted while the coroner determines whether the remains are Native American. The discovery is to be kept confidential and secure to prevent any further disturbance. If Native American, the coroner will notify the NAHC as mandated by state law who will then appoint a Most Likely Descendent. In the case where discovered human remains cannot be fully documented and recovered on the same day, the remains will be covered with muslin cloth and a steel plate that can be moved by heavy -equipment placed over the excavation opening to protect the remains. If this type of steel plate is not available, a tet -hour guard should be posted outside of working hours. The Tribe(s) will make every effort to recommend diverting the project and keeping the remains in situ and protected. If the project cannot be diverted, -it may be determined that burials will be removed. The Tribe(s) will work closely with the Qualified Archaeologist to ensure that the excavation is treated carefully, ethically, and respectfully. If data recovery is approved by the Tribe(s), documentation shall be taken which includes at a minimum. detailed descriptive notes and sketches. Additional types of documentation E1—E6 Pg105 Page 531 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 58 Rev 4-17 shall .be approved by the Tribe(s) for data recovery purposes. Cremations will either be removed in bulk or by means as necessary to ensure completely recovery of all material. If the discovery of human remains includes 4 or more burials, the location is considered a cemetery and a separate treatment plan shall be created. The project applicant shall consult with .the Tribe(s) regarding avoidance of all cemetery sites. Once complete, a final report of all activities is to be submitted to the NAHC. The Tribes) do NOT authorize any scientific study or the utilization of any invasive diagnostics -on human remains. 3), In the event that Native American cultural resources are discovered during :project activities, all work in the immediate vicinity of the find (within a 60 - foot buffer) shall cease and a qualified archaeologist meeting Secretary of Interior, standards shall be hired to assess the find. Work on the other portions of the project outside of the buffered area may continue during this assessment period. The archaeologist shall contact the GBMI-KN and the SMBMI for input regarding the preservation, retention and final disposition of any discovered cultural resources. The archaeologist shall prepare a mitigation plan and technical resources management report, which shall document the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Additionally, the GBMI-KN and the SMBMI will be contacted if any such find occurs and be provided .information and permittedlinvited to perform a site visit when the archaeologist makes his/her assessment, so as to provide Tribal input. All archaeological resources unearthed by project construction activities shall be evaluated by the Qualified Archaeologist and Native Monitor. If the resources are Native American in origin, the Tribe(s) shall coordinate with the landowner regarding treatment and 'curation of these resources. Typically, the Tribe(s) will request reburial or preservation for educational purposes. If a resource is determined by the Qualified Archaeologist to constitute a "historical resource" pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(a) or has a "unique archaeological resource" pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21083.2(g), the Qualified Archaeologist shall coordinate with the applicant and the City to develop a formal treatment plan that would serve to reduce impacts to the resources. The treatment plan established for the resources shall be in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section '15064-.5(f) for historical resources and Public Resources Code Sections 21083.2(b) for unique archaeological resources. Preservation in place (i.e., avoidance) is the preferred manner of treatment. If preservation in place is not feasible, treatment may include implementation of archaeological data recovery excavations to remove the resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and analysis. Any historic archaeological material that is not Native American in origin shall be curated at a public, non-profit institution with a research interest in the materials, such as the San Bernardino County Museum, if such an institution agrees to accept the material. If no institution accepts the archaeological material, they shall be donated to a local school or historical society in the area for educational purposes. 4) In the event that significant Native American historical resources, as defined by CEQA (as amended, 2015), are discovered and avoidance cannot be E 1—E6 Pg 1'06 Page 532 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Signi@tarit No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Rev 4-17 shall .be approved by the Tribe(s) for data recovery purposes. Cremations will either be removed in bulk or by means as necessary to ensure completely recovery of all material. If the discovery of human remains includes 4 or more burials, the location is considered a cemetery and a separate treatment plan shall be created. The project applicant shall consult with .the Tribe(s) regarding avoidance of all cemetery sites. Once complete, a final report of all activities is to be submitted to the NAHC. The Tribes) do NOT authorize any scientific study or the utilization of any invasive diagnostics -on human remains. 3), In the event that Native American cultural resources are discovered during :project activities, all work in the immediate vicinity of the find (within a 60 - foot buffer) shall cease and a qualified archaeologist meeting Secretary of Interior, standards shall be hired to assess the find. Work on the other portions of the project outside of the buffered area may continue during this assessment period. The archaeologist shall contact the GBMI-KN and the SMBMI for input regarding the preservation, retention and final disposition of any discovered cultural resources. The archaeologist shall prepare a mitigation plan and technical resources management report, which shall document the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Additionally, the GBMI-KN and the SMBMI will be contacted if any such find occurs and be provided .information and permittedlinvited to perform a site visit when the archaeologist makes his/her assessment, so as to provide Tribal input. All archaeological resources unearthed by project construction activities shall be evaluated by the Qualified Archaeologist and Native Monitor. If the resources are Native American in origin, the Tribe(s) shall coordinate with the landowner regarding treatment and 'curation of these resources. Typically, the Tribe(s) will request reburial or preservation for educational purposes. If a resource is determined by the Qualified Archaeologist to constitute a "historical resource" pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(a) or has a "unique archaeological resource" pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21083.2(g), the Qualified Archaeologist shall coordinate with the applicant and the City to develop a formal treatment plan that would serve to reduce impacts to the resources. The treatment plan established for the resources shall be in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section '15064-.5(f) for historical resources and Public Resources Code Sections 21083.2(b) for unique archaeological resources. Preservation in place (i.e., avoidance) is the preferred manner of treatment. If preservation in place is not feasible, treatment may include implementation of archaeological data recovery excavations to remove the resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and analysis. Any historic archaeological material that is not Native American in origin shall be curated at a public, non-profit institution with a research interest in the materials, such as the San Bernardino County Museum, if such an institution agrees to accept the material. If no institution accepts the archaeological material, they shall be donated to a local school or historical society in the area for educational purposes. 4) In the event that significant Native American historical resources, as defined by CEQA (as amended, 2015), are discovered and avoidance cannot be E 1—E6 Pg 1'06 Page 532 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, ORC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 59 ensured, an SOI -qualified archaeologist shall be retained to develop a cultural resources Treatment Plan, as well as a Discovery and Monitoring Plan, the drafts of which shall be provided to the GBMI-KN and the SMBMI for review and comment. All in -field investigations, assessments, and/or data recovery enacted pursuant to the finalized Treatment Pian shall be monitored by a GBMI-KN and SMBMI Tribal Participant(s). The Lead Agency and/or applicant shall, in good faith, consult with GBMI-KN and the SMBMI on the disposition and treatment of any artifacts or other cultural materials encountered during the project. 5) Non -Native American artifacts shall be inventoried, assessed, and analyzed for cultural affiliation, personal affiliation (prior ownership), function, and temporal placement. Subsequent to analysis and reporting, these artifacts shall be subjected to curation or returned to the Property Owner/Developer, as deemed appropriate. Once ground -altering activities have ceased or the Project Archaeologist determines that monitoring activities are no longer necessary, monitoring activities may be discontinued following notification to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to a California Native American tribe caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. 18. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project.- roject.a) Less Than a)Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the () Significant Less (✓) Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially significant With Mitigation Than Signiricant No b) Require or result in the construction of new water or Itnact Incorporated Impact Im act ensured, an SOI -qualified archaeologist shall be retained to develop a cultural resources Treatment Plan, as well as a Discovery and Monitoring Plan, the drafts of which shall be provided to the GBMI-KN and the SMBMI for review and comment. All in -field investigations, assessments, and/or data recovery enacted pursuant to the finalized Treatment Pian shall be monitored by a GBMI-KN and SMBMI Tribal Participant(s). The Lead Agency and/or applicant shall, in good faith, consult with GBMI-KN and the SMBMI on the disposition and treatment of any artifacts or other cultural materials encountered during the project. 5) Non -Native American artifacts shall be inventoried, assessed, and analyzed for cultural affiliation, personal affiliation (prior ownership), function, and temporal placement. Subsequent to analysis and reporting, these artifacts shall be subjected to curation or returned to the Property Owner/Developer, as deemed appropriate. Once ground -altering activities have ceased or the Project Archaeologist determines that monitoring activities are no longer necessary, monitoring activities may be discontinued following notification to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to a California Native American tribe caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. 18. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project.- roject.a) a)Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the () () () (✓) applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or () () () {✓} wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? C) Require or result in the construction of new storm water () () (} (✓) drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the () (} () {✓) project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? Rev 4-17 E1—E6 Pg107 Page 533 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 60 e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment () Less Than () (✓) provider, which serves or may serve the project that it Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potantialiy significant With Mitigation Than Significant No demand in addition to the provider's existing Impact Incur orated Impact Impact e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment () () () (✓) provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity () () (} (✓) to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and O (} O (✓) regulations related to solid waste? Comments: a) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP -1 and RP -4 treatment plants. The RP -1 capacity is sufficient to exceed the additional development within the western and southern areas of the City. The RP -4 treatment plant has a potential ultimate capacity of 28 mgd which is considered more than adequate to capacity to treat all increases in wastewater generation for buildout of the General Plan. The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. b) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP -4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP -1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which is at capacity. The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. C) All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment ORC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2016-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to recreational facilities caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. d) The project is served by the CVWD water system. There is currently a sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this project. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. e) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP -4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP -1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which is at capacity. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 4-17 61--E6 Pg 108 Page 534 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 61 f) Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to storm water drainage facilities caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. g) This project complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste. The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 19. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE Less Than a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the { } Significant Less (✓) Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or Impact Inca crated Impact Impact f) Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to storm water drainage facilities caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. g) This project complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste. The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 19. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the { } (} () (✓) quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually O O O (✓) limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with ,the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? C) Does the project have environmental effects that will {) () () (✓) cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Comments: a) The proposed project is located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. The project proposes to amend the General Plan land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and to amend the Zoning Map land use district from the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the General Commercial (GC) District for a 1.22 acre 2 -parcel site at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route and to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re- establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 square foot car wash on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow.Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue. The project site Rev 4-17 E1—E6 Pg109 Page 535 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 62 is characterized by the Mulberry Early Education Center in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the north, a commercial center in the General Commercial (GC) District to the south, residential uses in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the east, and vacant land in the Office -Professional (OP) District to the west. According to the General Plan Figure RC -4, and Section 4.4 of the General Plan FPEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources; therefore, development is not anticipated to adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the project is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan. The contribution of the project to cumulative biological impacts is not expected to be cumulatively considerable as the project site is within an urban area, is relatively small, and is isolated from areas of better habitat and is fully developed with an existing service station, No cultural resources are known to exist on the site; however, in the unlikely event that archaeological and paleontological resources are discovered during construction, mitigation measures are included to ensure proper handling and protection, b) if the proposed project were approved, then the applicant would be required to develop the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. The 2010 General Pian was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of build -out in the City and Sphere -of -Influence. The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to Aesthetics, Agriculture and Forest Resources, Air Quality, Climate Change and Mineral Resources. Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources; however, they would not reduce impacts to less -than -significant levels. As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)). The Traffic Impact Assessment prepared for the project site (}Guzman Associates, May 2017) identifies that under existing conditions, the Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route intersection operates at satisfactory LOS C or better during the AM and PM peak hours and under the existing condition plus project year scenario, the Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route intersection operates satisfactorily at LOS C or in the AM peak hour and LOS D in the PM peak hour: The project is in an area that is mostly developed with street improvements existing or included in project design. The project will not create a substantial increase in the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume, or congestion at intersections. The project site will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per City roadway standards. In addition, the City has established a Transportation Development fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of building permits. Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation. With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is required. C) Development of the site under the proposed land use change would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. The Initial Study identifies construction -related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact and includes mitigation measures to reduce emission levels to a less than significant impact on the environment (see Air Quality section above for detailed analysis and mitigation measures). Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality would be short- term and would cease once construction activities were completed. As prescribed by SCAQMD, the Air Quality & Climate Change Assessment (MIG Hogle-Ireland, Rev 4-17 E1—E6 Pg 110 Page 536 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Sfgnlficant With Mitigation Than significant No Impart i Incorporated Im act Im act is characterized by the Mulberry Early Education Center in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the north, a commercial center in the General Commercial (GC) District to the south, residential uses in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the east, and vacant land in the Office -Professional (OP) District to the west. According to the General Plan Figure RC -4, and Section 4.4 of the General Plan FPEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources; therefore, development is not anticipated to adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the project is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan. The contribution of the project to cumulative biological impacts is not expected to be cumulatively considerable as the project site is within an urban area, is relatively small, and is isolated from areas of better habitat and is fully developed with an existing service station, No cultural resources are known to exist on the site; however, in the unlikely event that archaeological and paleontological resources are discovered during construction, mitigation measures are included to ensure proper handling and protection, b) if the proposed project were approved, then the applicant would be required to develop the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. The 2010 General Pian was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of build -out in the City and Sphere -of -Influence. The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to Aesthetics, Agriculture and Forest Resources, Air Quality, Climate Change and Mineral Resources. Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources; however, they would not reduce impacts to less -than -significant levels. As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)). The Traffic Impact Assessment prepared for the project site (}Guzman Associates, May 2017) identifies that under existing conditions, the Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route intersection operates at satisfactory LOS C or better during the AM and PM peak hours and under the existing condition plus project year scenario, the Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route intersection operates satisfactorily at LOS C or in the AM peak hour and LOS D in the PM peak hour: The project is in an area that is mostly developed with street improvements existing or included in project design. The project will not create a substantial increase in the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume, or congestion at intersections. The project site will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per City roadway standards. In addition, the City has established a Transportation Development fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of building permits. Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation. With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is required. C) Development of the site under the proposed land use change would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. The Initial Study identifies construction -related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact and includes mitigation measures to reduce emission levels to a less than significant impact on the environment (see Air Quality section above for detailed analysis and mitigation measures). Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality would be short- term and would cease once construction activities were completed. As prescribed by SCAQMD, the Air Quality & Climate Change Assessment (MIG Hogle-Ireland, Rev 4-17 E1—E6 Pg 110 Page 536 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 63 August 2016), this analysis concluded that because the on-site emissions are low, the emissions would not exceed the ambient air quality standards prescribed by the SCAQMD, The Initial Study identified potentially significant impacts associated with the exposure of people to increased noise levels. A Noise Study (MIG Hogle-Ireland, August 2016) was submitted for the project that reviewed the potential interior and exterior noise levels. The report concluded that with the proposed mitigation measures (see Noise section above for detailed analysis and mitigation measures), the proposed project would not expose people to or generate noise levels in excess of the standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies and any elevated interior and exterior noise levels associated with the construction or operation of the proposed project would be reduced to less than significant. EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier PEIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply): (✓) General Plan FPEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified May 19, 2010) (✓) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) (✓) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115, Certified January 4, 1989) TECHNICAL APPENDICES (✓) Air Quality & Climate Change Assessment (MIG Hogle-Ireland, August 2016) (✓) Noise Study (MIG Hogle-Ireland, August 2016) (✓) Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment (MIG Hogle-Ireland, August 15, 2016) (✓) Traffic Impact Analysis (Kunzman Associates, Inc., May 17, 2017) Rev 4-17 E1—E6 Pg 111 Page 537 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 64 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION certify that I am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study. I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures. Further, l have revised the project plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects would occur. Applicant's Signature: Date: '� - 30 - 1 Rj Print Name and Title: V4- a ��.}�r� 1 Rev 4-17 E;1 --E;6 Pg 112 Page 538 MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART 111) Project File No.: DRC2015-00682 Applicant: Archibald Oil Initial Study Prepared by: Tom Grahn, Associate Planner Date: June 13, 2018 Mitigation Measures No. 1 Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date /initials Non -Compliance r •'$ectiori�3 ,Air Qttality� �-.x�s: �.,. —�4 �.�,. ;�-r._. ;�, ~�-. �- °ETA.. � .., � =` - ;=,. `r. 's. _ - i?LK.L.I::a'-�' -:i .5�.'.�,S ;4o..?�'.�•.rt: ��� .tr' �w� +... tie'_ Vr_-; kT.y'�.n_:� ��4a r �.r �.?�^c. y._�.� �r F Short Term (Construction) Emissions 1) During grading activity, all construction PD/BO C Review of plans A/C 214 equipment (? 150 horsepower) shall be California Air Resources Board (GARB) Tier 3 Certified or better. 2) All clearing, grading, earth -moving, or PD/BO C Review of plans A/C 214 excavation activities shall cease when winds exceed 25 mph per SCAQMD guidelines in order to limit fugitive dust emissions. 3) The contractor shall ensure that all disturbed PD C Review of plans A/C 2/4 unpaved roads and disturbed areas within the Project are watered at least three (3) times daily during dry weather. Watering, with complete coverage of disturbed areas, shall occur at least three times a day, preferably in the midmorning, afternoon, and after work is done for the day. 4) The contractor shall ensure that traffic speeds PD C Review of plans A/C 214 on unpaved roads and Project site areas are reduced to 15 miles per hour or less. 5) All construction equipment shall be maintained PD C Review of plans A/C 214 in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 6) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, PDIBO C Review of pians C 2 the developer shall submit Construction Plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that Page 1 of 18 Page 539 Mitigation Measures No. / Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date /Initials Non -Compliance low -emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District SCAQMD as well as City Planning staff. 7) The construction contractor shall utilize electric PD C Review of plans A/C 2/4 or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 8) The construction contractor shall ensure that PD C Review of plans A/C 2/4 construction -grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 9) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance BO B Review of plans A/C 2 standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. l 10) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low- pressure spray, 11) All construction equipment shall comply with PD C Review of plans A/C 2/4 SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions.- ovisions.- Reestablish Reestablish ground cover on the BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility BO C Review of plans A/C 214 of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the BO C Review of plans A/C 214 amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in BO C Review of plans A 4 accordance with local ordinances and use sound enginee(ing practices. j • Sweep streets according to a schedule BO C During construction A 4 i Page 2 of 18 Page 540 M i M Ln Mitigation Measures No. 1 Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for 1 Implementing Action for Monitoring Freguency Verification Verification Non -Compliance established by the City if silt is carried over —Date/Initials- to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high BO C During construction A 4 winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24 -inch freeboard BO C During Construction A 4 ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tars or other suitable means. 12) The site shall be treated with water or other BO C During construction A 4 soil -stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB)) daily to reduce Particulate Matter PMto emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 13) Chemical soil -stabilizers (approved by BO C During construction A 4 SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. Long Term Emissions 14) Provide preferential parking to high occupancy BO C Review of plans A/C 214 vehicles and shuttle services. 15) Schedule truck deliveries and pickups during BO C Review of plans A/C 214 off-peak hours. 16) Improve thermal integrity of the buildings and BO C Review of plans A1C 2/4 reduce thermal load with automated time clocks or occupant sensors. 17) Landscape with native and/or drought -resistant BO C Review of plans A/C 214 species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 18) Provide lighter color roofing and road materials BO C Review of plans A/C 214 and tree planting programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC -01 measure. 19) All commercial structures shall be required to PD C Review of plans D 2/3 incorporate hi h -efficient /low- ollutin Page 3 of 18 Page 541 Mitigation Measures No. ! Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Non -Compliance heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water -Date/initials- heaters. 20) All commercial structures shall be required to PD C Review of plans D 213 incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stri in . _ -r,n,'�-� onvY`�ri.� * *t`r' .i... -i` ',�'z.��^'^'-:!! :Section4 �Biologicals�esatli'csx : : c,.� ;� _.�, 'r�: "�'t.'; '---�• ..;; S.'� `. =I ' - y .-,a-? .i ^��.� : +�� - � �`' r.� �'^ _ � `a h r,.C•,°.. _ _ . , A ,:.•_. .. �+r•..rat.,,.s i.,.K<..ar-kms/ Jw.zLL�-Y-'rxi.w`•..^. nSS...s.. } der '.x -e -..a,:.: ,..._ ..r+ _ �:in-i tw _�'�.^.:..$) .Y Y- _''i✓ r .Z.i;r",.w .1ti., :,,.ti..S.._ T r -+'s. =�: 1) Three days prior to the removal of vegetation PD B Review of plans B 214 or ground -disturbing activities, a breeding bird survey that is in conformance with the Migratory Bird Act shall be required to determine whether nesting is occurring. Occupied nests shall not be disturbed unless a qualified biologist verifies through non- invasive methods that either (a) the adult birds I have not begun egg -laying or incubation; or (b) l i the juveniles from the occupied nests are foraging independently and are capable of independent survival. If the biologist is unable to verify one of the above conditions, then no disturbance shall occur within 300 feet of non - I raptor nests, and within 5,000 feet of raptor nests, during the breeding season to avoid abandonment of the young. If nests are discovered, they shall be avoided through the establishment of an appropriate buffer setback, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. The temporary "no construction" area shall be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have i fledged and have left the nest, construction in the area may resume. y $ ,k.!':i :7 ti"`��^r+e Yi'o.'✓F w�4 ..� '.;' t^i �.!'t'ir��� �h'.?t HM1ii Sectl'on5 CAII�a)`alRSdces C 4��..�xA�'+�jK.]. y j [fI*'brt ��`r�.� � �.�1� __ yf � ` Y.F�.. '.. .}1 .-•.5., -�. "f x'. .c. _ .,p. r.- •_ - 4^a .:1 0 ..,. ... ...•' 1) if any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve Page 4 of 18 Page 542 Mitigation Measures No. l Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring__Frequency Verification Verification Date /Initials Non -Compliance them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect PD/BO C Review of report AID 314 undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an Opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require PD/BO C Review of report AID 314 incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the PD/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 archaeological heritage of the area. • Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with P/D BIC Review of AID Section 21083.2 Archeological resources Plans/Report During of CEQA to eliminate adverse project Construction effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, including but not limited to, avoiding archeological sites, capping or covering site with soil, planning the site as a park or green space or paying an in-kind mitigation fee. • Prepare a technical resources PD C Review of report A/D 3/4 management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report, with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or PD B Review of report A/D 4 animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The ; paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations Page 5 of 18 Page 543 m m rn .n LO -i w Mitigation Measures No. ! Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date /Initials Non -Compliance regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained PD B Review of report AID 4 and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth -disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area BO B/C Review of report A/D 4 being cleared or graded, divert earth - disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered PD D Review of report D 3 fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of Rancho PD D Review of report D 3 Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy to the report to San Bernardino County Museum. - ..4 - `!t' {s7y7,'M :.an.e�•1�,'i. Section &, Geolo as Soil"s�„"C* u.-.71 ax �4os�.'.'.'�.�'h ::.-"«'i+_;•..�";."it •nom �:"i`"r.,.�.1rw,s. > finks .�.::.e .i r' _ter. _M :.._.^" r , '� ._ , .'. fi.Y„ 1: �t is aL t4 .� r i�+ f i f - .� 5 1) The site shall be treated with water or other BO C During construction^ A 4 soil -stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re- planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. I 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept BO C During construction A 4 according to a schedule established by the ! City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of - f construction. Page 6 of 18 Page 544 Mitigation Measures No. l Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date /Initials Non -Com lianco 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when BO C During construction A 4 wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil -stabilizers (approved by BO C During construction A 4 SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. ,.-�.L¢ t„ t.:��h� a:�u.5'�'-'C�i�.« T - � .} .rr�r� Section 74 Greenhouse Gas I Missions � � � r.� r�-:•.�..1 's't H+` f - - Y 'S .'a. :..;`; i .�, - � -�t`Ssf":i...,�i:.:.ti,.'tw17:�,Y-�'.. ate..'.ran+al.•..�':5....vs..�..,..�,. ,_5^J'.....,t:K��'y.-r _,z s.. _ y"'_ .<. f.. _ _Ai ,-r � ''y � �' N-..r-�.'.� - � � Cumulative Short Term (Construction) GHG Emissions 1} The project must comply with all rules that BO C During construction A 4 assist in reducing short-term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAWMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil -stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas i as quickly as possible. 2) The construction contractor shall select BO C During construction A 4 ! construction equipment based on low -emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit ! a statement on the grading plan that ensures I all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures' specification. ! 3) Trucks shall not idle continuously for more BO C During construction A 4 than 5 minutes. 4) Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be BO C During construction A 4 I utilized in lieu of gasoline- or diesel -powered ! engines where feasible. 5) Construction should be timed so as not to BO C During construction A 4 interfere withpeak-hour traffic. 6) Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be BO C During construction A 4 supported and encouraged for construction crew. Cumulative Long Term (Operational) GHG F Emissions 7) Construction and Building materials small be BO A During Construction C 2 ! produced and/or manufactured local/ . Use Page 7 of 18 Page 545 Mitigation Measures No. 1 Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for MonitoringFrequency Verification Verification Date /Initials Non -Compliance "Green Building Materials" such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low -volatile -organic -compound VOC materials. 8) Design all buildings to exceed California BO A During Construction C 2 Building Code Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of: • Increased insulation. • Limit air leakage through the structure. • Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances. • Landscape and developed site utilizing shade, prevailing winds, and landscaping. • Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems. • Install light colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements. • Install solar or light emitting diodes (LED's) for outdoor lighting. 9) Prepare a comprehensive water conservation BO A During Construction C 2 strategy appropriate for the project and include the following: • Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. • Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available and/or install the infrastructure to deliver and use reclaimed water. • Design building to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets, dual flush toilets, and waterless Page 8of18 Page 546 Mitigation Measures No. / Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date /Initials Non -Compliance urinals/water heaters. • Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non -vegetated surfaces. 14) Reuse and recycle construction and demolition CE A Review of plans C 2 waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educated employees about reducing waste and about recycling. _ ,r�7"y' tiy.r�T�di:v`i-.,i:{'y':'<ir!'','S i�?R>b:, 1V•'` b?ti'inll-<+ :•i:� eii-6 Secfion�9 H d�7,'i lCla er�Qualii,}R}. roloyg:h u,r'; 5::. -;-.�r••;yrw,�_.-a 1 - V- -`ir. y 1p=' i whSv:'-Ai.7 ll�rri-i. . �i .lxr-1 � xeyr f 3 -��y.��':,i1rr: }.... 'yl'j'^"''rili.+cii -'�qi'�� _ -Y ..'�'. M?' 'k• N. y' dt N.sf .Y: Construction Activities 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit BO B/CID Review of plans A/C 214 applicant shall submit to Building Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 214 included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as BO B/CID Review of plans A/C 2/4 sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. Page 9of18 Page 547 Mitigation Measures No. l Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of 1 Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date /Initials Non -Compliance 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 5) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, BO BIC/D Review of plans A/C 214 the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NO[) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Post -Construction Operational . 6) Prior to issuance of building permits, the BO BICID Review of plans A/C 2/4 applicant shall submit to the City Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the,storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 7) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for BO BIC/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. Page 10 of 18 Page 548 Mitigation Measures No. I Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring ­_Frequency Verification Verification Date /Initials Non -Compliance Grading Activities 8) The developer shall implement the BMPs BO BICID Review of plans AIC 214 identified in the Site Drainage Plan (SPS Engineering, May 2017) to reduce construction pollutants from entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. S'1. Sr,�MvCa rv^tlsA F yId�i^'' Sect R:�i*37 SeCit�oll al'L: -elllol5e`' rr r a4 r •{ a yr. -,a Mk `; eti ] w {;' - }Nv i=glL.w� • �rw „� 'r" �.� ' i � i 1 7 x al, RE �?1 "• ^.. +�'- r RE w g sr 4� it - din S/c4+yc -aY �{ .f iS'• 'L a„-� / ..9'l ii^�e`•",e ` +-.``. xA•.� �. "`iLi f.;✓a, •. • k q a„u }!-` ;p•; p ,s li•* 4T Exterior 1) Prior to the issuance of any grading plans a PD/BO B Review of plans A1C 214 construction -related noise mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. The Plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction. 2) Business operations shall maintain a noise PDIBO E Review of plans A1C 7 level at 60dB or less during the hours of 10 p.m. until 7 a.m. No loading and unloading activities including opening, closing, or other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials, garbage cans, or other similar objects between the hours of 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to residential areas. 3) During all project site excavation and grading, BO B Review of plans A1C 214 the project contractors shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers consistent with the manufacturers' standards. 4) The project contractor shall place all stationary BO B Review of plans A1C 214 construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors nearest the project site. 5) The construction contractor shall locate BO B Review of plans AIC 214 equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction - related noise sources and noise -sensitive receptors nearest the project site during all protect construction. Page 11 of 18 Page 549 Mitigation Measures No. l Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date !Initials Non -Compliance 6) The construction contractor shall obtain the CE B Review of plans D 214 City's approval for its haul plan, with the planned haul truck routes avoiding residential areas to the extent feasible. 7) The construction contractor shall change the PD/BO C Review of plans A 214 timing and/or sequence of the noisiest construction operations to avoid sensitive times of the day. 8) During construction, the contractor shall PD B Review of plans A/C 2/4 ensure all construction equipment is equipped with appropriate noise attenuating devices. 9) Idling equipment shall be turned off when not PD B Review of plans A/C 214 in use. 10) Equipment shall be maintained so that vehicles PD B Review of plans AIC 214 and their loads are secured from rattling and banging. 11) Construction or grading shall not take place BO BIC/D Review of plans A/C 214 between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 12) Prior to issuance of grading or building permits, BO BIC Review of plans A/C 214 the applicant shall submit evidence of noise control measures that include 1) vibratory pile drivers or other pile driving noise controls, 2) temporary sound curtains at least 8 feet tall placed around all noise producing equipment, and 3) fitting appropriate mufflers that achieve a minimum 20 dBA reduction in construction - related noise levels. 13) Construction or grading noise levels shall not BO B/CID Review of plans A/C 214 exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediate!y notify the Page 12 of 18 Page 550 M M a� N cn Mitigation Measures No. 1 Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date /Initials Non -Compliance Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 14) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 214 between the hours' of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes and include appropriate noise mitigation measures. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. :=.e�.�war��."�"''i?✓Av e�K �-A ;t�l:u�1� Section1¢7¢ T. bal.�uivatYRso[frces.��..���- Rr�;.:,r: , M�_ ^�,� _ Y __R;ii �•_ �xe� �.=`a a•-ih t" r. _ _ :.4.F•._�ri+Y}I?4 u•...:rR:E.s.rn , .,.. r a:✓ ...:c •,+.w-w.a_. ��a ,r c.9'r '.' 7w FF �wtv ,'�i-.r i ki`s � t`• 1) The applicant shall contact the Gabrieleno PD/BO C Review of plans A/D 3/4 Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation (GBMI- KN) and the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians (SMBMI) to discuss Tribal Monitoring of the project during all ground disturbing activities, and any trenching below the initial grade level, to ensure that cultural resources that may be encountered during ground disturbances are protected and preserved for study. The monitor(s) must be approved by the Tribal Representatives and will be present on- site during ground disturbing activities. The Native American Monitor(s) will complete monitoring logs on a daily basis. The logs will provide descriptions of the daily activities, including construction activities, locations, soil, and any cultural' materials identified. In addition, the monitor(s) will be required to provide. insurance certificates, including liability insurance, for any archaeological resource(s) encountered during grading and excavation Page 13 of 18 Page 551 Mitigation Measures No. / Implementing Action Responsible for Monitoring Monitoring FrequencyFrequenl2y Timing of Verification Method of Verification Verified Date /initials Sanctions for Non -Compliance activities pertinent to the provisions outlined in the California Environmental Quality Act, California Public Resources Code Division 13, and Section 21083.2 (a) through (k). The on- site monitoring shall end when the project site grading and excavation activities are completed, or when the Tribal Representatives and monitor have indicated that the site has a low potential for archeological resources. The applicant shall submit the results of these consultations to the City prior to issuance of grading permits for the project site. 2) In the event that human remains or funerary PD/BO C Review of plans A/D 3/4 objects are encountered during any activities associated with the project, work in the immediate vicinity (within a 100 -foot buffer of the find) shall cease and the County Coroner shall be contacted pursuant to State Health and Safety Code §7050.5, and that code shall be enforced for the duration of the project. Prior to the start of ground disturbing activities, the land owner shall arrange a designated site location within the footprint of the project for the respectful reburial of the human remains and/or ceremonial objects. Any discoveries of human skeletal material shall be immediately reported to the County Coroner. The monitor will then notify the Qualified Archaeologist and the construction manager who will call the coroner. Work will continue to be diverted while the coroner determines whether the remains are Native American. The discovery is to be kept confidential and secure to prevent any further disturbance. if Native American, the coroner will notify the NAHC as mandated by state law who will then appoint a Most Likely Descendent. In the case where discovered human remains cannot be fully documented and recovered on the same day, the remains will be covered with muslin cloth and a steel Page 14 of 18 Page 552 Mitigation Measures No. I -Implementing Action Responsible for Monitoring Monitoring Timing of Frequency Verification Method of Verification Verified Date /Initials Sanctions for Non -Com lianc plate that can be moved by heavy equipment placed over the excavation opening to protect the remains. If this type of steel plate is not available, a 24 hour guard should be posted outside of working hours. The Tribe(s) will make every effort to recommend diverting the project and keeping the remains in situ and protected. If the project cannot be diverted, it may be determined that burials will be removed. The Tribe(s) will work closely with the Qualified Archaeologist to ensure that the excavation is treated carefully, ethically, and respectfully. If data recovery is approved by the Tribe(s), documentation shall be taken which includes at a minimum detailed descriptive notes and sketches. Additional types of documentation shall be approved by the Tribe(s) for data recovery purposes. Cremations will either be removed in bulk or by means as necessary to ensure complete recovery of all material. If the discovery. of human remains includes 4 or more burials, the location is considered a cemetery and a separate treatment plan shall be created. The project applicant shall consult with the Tribe(s) regarding avoidance of all cemetery sites. Once complete, a final report of all activities are to be submitted to the NAHC. The Tribe(s) do NOT authorize any scientific study or the utilization of any invasive diagnostics on human remains. 3) In the event that Native American cultural PD/BO C Review of plans AID 314 resources are discovered during project activities, all work in the immediate vicinity of the find (within a 60 -foot buffer) shall cease and a qualified archaeologist meeting Secretary of Interior standards shall be hired to assess the find. Work on the other portions of the project outside of the buffered area may continue during this assessment period. The archaeologist shall contact the GBMI-KN and Page 15 of 18 Page 553 Mitigation Measures No. l -Implementing Action Responsible for Monitoring Monitoring Frequency Timing of Verification Method of Verification Verified Date /Initials Sanctions for Non -Com liana the SMBMI for input regarding the preservation, retention and final disposition of any discovered cultural resources. The archaeologist shall prepare a mitigation plan and technical resources management report, which shall document the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Additionally, the GBMI-KN and the SMBMI will be contacted if any such find occurs and be provided information and permitted/invited to perform a site visit when the archaeologist makes his/her assessment, so as to provide Tribal input. All archaeological resources unearthed by project construction activities shall be evaluated by the Qualified Archaeologist and Native Monitor. If the resources are Native American in origin, the Tribe(s) shall coordinate with the landowner regarding treatment and curation of these resources. Typically, the Tribe(s) will request reburial or preservation for educational purposes. If a resource is determined by the Qualified Archaeologist to constitute a "historical resource" pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(a) or has a "unique archaeological resource" pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 210832(g), the Qualified Archaeologist shall coordinate with the applicant and the City to develop a formal treatment plan that would serve to reduce impacts to the resources. The treatment plan established for the resources shall be in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(f) for historical resources and Public Resources Code Sections 21083.2(b) for unique archaeological resources. Preservation in place (i.e., avoidance) is the preferred manner of treatment. If preservation in place is not feasible, treatment may include Page 16 of 18 Page 554 Mitigation Measures No. 1 Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for -Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date /Initials Non -Com lianci implementation of archaeological data recovery excavations to remove the resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and analysis. Any historic archaeological material that is not illative American in origin shall be curated at a public, non-profit institution with a research interest in the materials, such as the San Bernardino County Museum, if such an institution agrees to accept the material. If no institution accepts the archaeological material, they shall be donated to a local school or historical society in the area for educational purposes. 4) In the event that significant Native American PD/BO C Review of plans A/D 3/4 historical resources, as defined by CEQA (as amended, 2015), are discovered and avoidance cannot be ensured, an SOI -qualified archaeologist shall be retained to develop a cultural resources Treatment Plan, as well as a Discovery and Monitoring Plan, the drafts of which shall be provided to the GBM/ -KN and the SMBMI for review and comment. All in -field investigations, assessments, and/or data recovery enacted pursuant to the finalized Treatment Plan shall be monitored by a GBMI- KN and SMBMI Tribal Participant(s). The Lead Agency and/or applicant shall, in good faith, consult with GBMI-KN and the SM BM1 on the disposition and treatment of any artifacts or other cultural materials encountered during the pr9ject. 5) Non -Native American artifacts shall be PD/BO C Review of plans A/D 314 inventoried, assessed, and analyzed for cultural affiliation, personal affiliation (prior ownership), function, and temporal placement. Subsequent to analysis and reporting, these artifacts shall be subjected to curation or returned to the Property Owner/Developer, as deemed appropriate. Page 17 of 18 Page 555 Mitigation Measures No. 1 -implementing Action Responsible for Monitoring Monitoring Frequency Timing of Verification Method of Verification Verified Date!InitialsNon-Com Sanctions for liana Once ground -altering activities have ceased 1 -Withhold Recordation of Final Map _PD - Planning Director or designee B - Prior To Construction B - Other Agency Permit I Approval 2 - Withhold Grading or Building Permit —CE - City Engineer or designee or the Project Archaeologist determines that C - Plan Check 3 -Withhold Certificate of Occupancy BO - Building Official or designee D - On Completion D - Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/ Plans) 4 - Stop Work Order monitoring activities are no longer necessary, E - Operating 5 - Retain Deposit or Bonds FC - Fire Chief or designee monitoring activities may be discontinued 7 - Citation following notification to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. Ke y to Checklist Abbreviations 'Z Z� Res p"b_nsi Rersqw*i��, t J CDD - Community Development Director or designee A -With Each New Development A - On-site Inspection 1 -Withhold Recordation of Final Map _PD - Planning Director or designee B - Prior To Construction B - Other Agency Permit I Approval 2 - Withhold Grading or Building Permit —CE - City Engineer or designee C - Throughout Construction C - Plan Check 3 -Withhold Certificate of Occupancy BO - Building Official or designee D - On Completion D - Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/ Plans) 4 - Stop Work Order _PO - Police Captain or designee E - Operating 5 - Retain Deposit or Bonds FC - Fire Chief or designee 6 - Revoke CUP 7 - Citation Page 18 of 18 Page 556 City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684, Design Review DRC2015-00682, Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-00681, Variance DRC2016-00831, and Minor Exception DRC2017-00879. This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above -listed project. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components — This MMP contains the following elements: 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project. 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management — The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project planner, assigned by the Planning Director, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures — The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. 2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address. City of Rancho Cucamonga — Lead Agency Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 EXHIBIT O E1 --E6 Pg131 Page 557 Mitigation Monitoring Program GPA DRC2015-00683, ZMA DRC2015-00684, DR DRC2015-00682, CUP DRC2015-00681, VAR DRC2016-00831, and ME DRC2017-00879. Page 2 3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed, as determined by the project planner, or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner. 4. The project planner, or responsible City department, will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development. 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. 7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The Department shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time. 9. In those instances requiring Jong -term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or Planning Director prior to the issuance of building permits. E1—E6 Pg 132 Page 558 BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC. "We'll Take (-'at-e Of !t" May 18, 2018 Mr. Donald Granger, Senior Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department P.Q. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Re: Archibald Oil DRC2015-00681 Dear Mr. Granger: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MAY 2 1 2018 RECEIVED • PLANNIN( Burrtec Waste Industries, Inc. is in receipt of the Initial Study for a service station remodeling project located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Based upon the Site Pian included in the package, we understand that the project will include a service station, car wash, and convenience store. A new trash enclosure is proposed for the northeast corner of the property. Access may be taken from both Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route with a driveway looped around the building, Based upon the information provided, Burrtec should be able to adequately service the new trash enclosure. AB 341 and AB 1826 require that commercial businesses generating more than four cubic yards of waste per week participate in a commercial waste recycling program. Businesses that sell food must also participate in a food waste recycling program. Please be advised that the project will require at least a three (3) cubic yard bin each for waste and mixed recyclables. The project should also make provisions to provide for an additional bin in the trash enclosure for food waste. Depending upon the amount of food waste generated, the project may be serviced with 96 -gallon carts or a two (2) cubic yard bin. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this project. If you have any questions regarding our comments, please feel free to contact me at (909) 429-4200 or gkoontz@burrtec.com. Sincerely, Gary Koontz Facility Project Manager .Aagn rharn, A,,--,•^ Fontana, California 92335 909-429-4200 • FAX 909-429-4290 EXHIBIT P E1—EG Pg133 Page 559 Matthew Rodriquez Secretary for Environmental Protection May 23, 2018 Mr. Tom Grahn Department of Toxic Substances Control Barbara A. Lee. Director 5796 Corporate Avenue Cypress. California 90630 Associate Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Tom. GrahnCcD.Cityofrc.com Edmund G. Brown Jr. Governor CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MAY 8 0 2018 RECEIVED - PLANNING INITIAL STUDY AND PROPOSED MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION (ND) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2015-00681 (ARCHIBALD OIL), LOCATED AT ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND ARROW ROUTE, RACHO CUCAMONGA, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY (SCH# 2018051011) Dear. Grahn: The Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) has reviewed the subject ND. The following project description is stated in the ND: "The applicant, Archibald Oil, proposes to amend the General Plan land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and to amend the Zoning Map land use district from the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the General Commercial (GC) District for 2 parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) with a combined area of 1.22 acres located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. The applicant also proposes to re-establish the operation (including retail sales) of an existing vacant/inactive service station that consists of a 1,728-squarefoot service station building, a 1,481 -square foot fuel pump canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and to construct a 968 -square foot car wash on APN: 0208-291-05. There is no proposal for development of APN: 0208-291-06 associated with this project." Based on the review of the submitted document DTSC has the following comments: The ND should identify and determine whether current or historic uses at the project site may have resulted in any release of hazardous wastes/substances. A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment may be appropriate to identify any recognized environmental conditions. EXHIBIT Q E1 --E6 Pg134 Page 560 Mr. Tom Grahn May 23, 2018 Page 2 2. If there are any recognized environmental conditions in the project area, then proper investigation, sampling and remedial actions overseen by the appropriate regulatory agencies should be conducted prior to the new development or any construction. 3. DTSC recommends evaluation, proper investigation and mitigation, if necessary, on onsite areas with current or historic PCB -containing transformers. 4. The ND states, "The applicant also proposes to re-establish the operation (including retail sales) of an existing vacant/inactive service station that consists of ... APN: 0208-291-05." if the site was used as a service station in the past, please identify whether underground storage tanks (USTs) were used at the site and the status of those USTs along with the following information in the ND: a. Identify the name(s) of the regulatory agency(ies) approved the closure of any USTs at the site. b. Indicate whether the UST resulted in soil/groundwater contamination. If soil/groundwater is impacted, then evaluate potential vapor intrusion onsite associated with soil/groundwater contamination. c. DTSC is unable to evaluate whether vapor sampling and/or potential vapor intrusion risk was adequately addressed due to lack of relevant detailed information in the ND. 5. If soil contamination is suspected or observed in the project area, then excavated soil should be sampled prior to export/disposal. If the soil is contaminated, it should ibe disposed of properly in accordance with all applicable and relevant laws and regulations. In addition, if the project proposes to import soil to backfill the excavated areas, proper evaluation and/or sampling should be conducted to make sure that the imported soil is free of contamination. 6. If during construction/demolition of the project, soil and/or groundwater contamination is suspected, construction/der- olition in the area should cease and appropriate health and safety procedures should be implemented. If it is determined that contaminated soil and/or groundwater exist, the ND should identify how any required. investigation and/or remediation will be conducted, and the appropriate government agency to provide regulatory oversight. E1 -E6 Pg135 Page 561 Mr. Tom Grahn May 23, 2018 Page 3 If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact me at (714) 484-5380 or by email at Johnson.Abraham(a-)_dtsc.ca.gov. Sincerely, t � J braham - Prger Brownfields Restoration and School Evaluation Branch Site Mitigation and Restoration Program - Cypress kllshlja cc: Governor's Office of Planning and Research (via e-mail) State Clearinghouse P.O. Box 3044 Sacramento, California 95812-3044 State. ciearing house o r.ca. ov Mr. Dave Kereazis (via e-mail) Office of Planning & Environmental Analysis Department of Toxic Substances Control Dave.Kereazis dtsc.ca. ov Mr. Shahir Haddad, Chief (via e-mail) Schools Evaluation and Brownfields Cleanup Brownfields and Environmental Restoration Program - Cypress Shah ir.Haddad(a7dtsc.ca. gov CEQA# 2018051011 E1 -E6 Pg136 Page 562 MICHAEL PAULS ASSOCIATES 6475 E PACIFIC COAST HWY #135 LONG BEACH CA 90803 PH (562) 434-2835 June 4, 2018 Mr. Tom Grahn Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga CA 91729 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA JUN 0 4 2018 RECEIVED - PLANNING RE: 8477 Archibald Avenge (GPA)DRC2015-00683; (ZMA)DRC 2015-00684; (CUP)DRC2015-00681; (V)DRC2016-00831 Response to comments from the Department of Toxic Substance Control Dear Mr. Gralin: Please accept this letter in response to the comments provided by the Department of Toxic Substances Control. Please see attached Remedial Action Completion Certificate letter, dated November 5, 2001, issued by the County of San Bernardino Fire Department, Office of the Fire Marshal, Hazardous Materials Division, for the subject site, reference as #2001012 indicating that no further remediation action is required. Additionally, there has never been and currently does not have any transformers containing PCB on the site. Sincerely, Attachment: County of San Bernardino Fire Department, Letter dated November 5, 2001 E1 --EG pg 137 Page 563 COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT OFFICE OF THE FIRE NlARSHAI. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS DIVISION 385 Norlh Arrowhead Avenue, Seroed Floor • San Bernardino LA 92415-0153 COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINI r ECONOMIC DEVEiPMENT it BIND PUBLIC SERVICES GROUP REMEDIAL ACTION COMPLETION CERTIFICATION NOV 05mi MOBIL OIL CORPORATIOI~ SITE r.' 2001012 3700 W. 190TH STREET TORRANCE, CA 90509 ATTENTION: JOHNNY [AEDRANO PETER R. HILLS Fire Chief County Fire warden SUBJECT: UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK (UST) CASE CLOSURE FOR MOBIL 18-AJ6, 8477 ARCHIBALD AVENUE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 UNAUTHORIZED RELEASE REPORT D, .TED 3121101 This fetter confirms the completion of site invc ligation and corrective action for the underground storage tank(s) former) located at the above- described location. Thank you for your cooperation the, _.ghoul this investigation. Your willingness and promptness in responding to our inquiries concerning the former underground storage tank(s) are greatly appreciated. Based on information in the above -referenced file and with the provision that the information provided to #his agency was accurate and representative of site conditions, this agency finds that the site investigation and corrective action carried out at your underground storage tank(s) site is in compliance with requirements of subdivisions (a) and (b) of Section 25299.37 of the Health and Safety Code and with corrective action regulations adopted pursuant to Section 25299.77 of the Health and Safety Code and t iat no fi_crth:,r action related to the petroleum release(s) at the site is required.. This notice is issued pursuant :) subdivisior (h) of Section 25299.37 of the Health and Safety Code. Please contact Ja .kson Crutsingerof our office at (909) 387-3041 if you have any questions regi Jing this matter. Sincerely, ."If R �� rDEC 1 12M PETER S. BRIERTY/D VISION G ilEF HAZARDOUS MATERS„LS DIVI: ION Qcc; Rose Scott: Santa Ana R� ,ional Water Quality C ntrol Bo rcf ::. Nancy Co nacho, State W =.er Resources Contrc 3oard I E1 -E6 Pg138 Page 564 South Coast Air Quality Management District 21805 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA Q 1705-4178 a (909) 396-2000 - %"vw.agnid.gov SENT VIA E-MAIL AND USPS: Tom.0rahn0!city0frc.us Toni Grahn, Associate Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Department P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMQW" 018 MAY 2 9 2018 RECEIVED - PLANNING Mitio.ated Net?ative Declaration (HIND) for the Proposed Archibald Oil (General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683, Zonina Map Amendment DRC2015-00684. Design Review DRC2015-00682. Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-00685. Variance DRC2016-00831, and Minor Exception DRC2017-00879) The South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) staff appreciates the opportunity to comment on the above-mentioned document. The following continent is meant as guidance for the Lead Agency and should be incorporated into the Final MND. SCAOIVID Staff s Suniniary of the Proiect Description The Lead Agency proposes to re-establish the operation of a gas service station that consists of a 1,728 - square -foot set -vice station building, a 1,481 -square -foot fueling pump canopy with four pumps, and a 968 -square -foot car wash on 1.22 acres (Proposed Project). According to the MND, the Proposed Project is partially surrounded by sensitive [and uses such as an early education center to the north and residential uses to the east and west (across Archibald Avenue). Construction is expected to take approximately sir montlis t. SCAQMD Staffs Comments Permits and Compliance with SCAQMD Rules Since the Proposed Project involves operation of a gasoline service station, a permit from the SCAQMD would be required, and the SCAQMD should be identified as a Responsible Agency for the Proposed Project in the Final MND. Please note that any assumptions used in the air quality analysis in the Final MND will be the basis for permit conditions and limits. The Final MND should also demonstrate compliance with SCAQMD Rules, including, but are not limited to, Rule 201 -- Pen -nit to Construct, Rule 203 — Permit to Operate, and Rule 461 -- Gasoline Transfer and Dispensing. If there are permitting questions concerning the gasoline smice station, they can be directed to SCAQMD Engineering and Permitting staff at (909) 396-2551. Ru• Quality Analysis — Operational Impacts In the Air Quality analysis, the Lead Agency found that the Proposed Project's regional and localized construction and operational air quality impacts would be less than significant. However, it does not appear that the Air Quality analysis included operational ROG emissions generated from storage tanks or from the fueling process. This may have likely led to an under -estimation of the Proposed Project's operational air quality impacts. It is important to note that while CaIEEMod'- quantiftes mobile source I NIND. Appendix A, CaIEE.Wod Output. CalEEmod incorporates up-to-date state and lolly approved emission factors and methodologies tier estimating pollutant emission; from typical land use de%elopment. CalEEMod is the only software model maintained by the California Air Pollution Control Oftirrrc e "I '-()A) and i available tree of charge at: �ti+va.ca[cemod.cnrn. EXHIBIT R E1—E6Pg139 Page 565 Tom Grafin 2 May 79, 2018 emissions (e.g., trip visits by patrons) associated with operating a gasoline service station, CaIEEMod does not quantify the operational stationary source emissions from the storage tanks and fueling equipment. Therefore, it is recottunended that the Lead Agency ttse its best efforts to quantify and disclose operational emissions from the fueling process in the Final MND. Health Risk Assessment (HRA) Analysis In the MND, the Lead Agency stated that a HRA analysis is not required for the Proposed Project because the Proposed Project does not include use of stationary emergency or prime compression ignition internal combustion engines, portable diesel engines, or other equipment subject to AB2588'. SCAQMD staff disagrees with the analysis. Enacted in 1987, AB2588 is an air torics hot spots program and requires stationary sources to report the types and quantities of certain substances routinely released into the air. An AB2588 Air Toxics Hot Spot Health Risk Assessment (HRA) estimates potential health risks over a lifetime of exposure from air torics for exit facilities (Emphasis addeA pursuant to SCAQMD Rule 1402 and does not apply to new or planned facilities. Here, the Proposed Project is a new or planned gasoline service facility that is subject to the requirements of SCAQMD Rule 1401. 'I7terefore, AB2598 HRA should not be used as a screening tool to determine if a HRA analysis is warranted for the Proposed Project. Moreover, since the operation of gasoline stations will emit air toxics, 1lRAs are required as part of the SCAQMD permitting requirements for gasoline stations. Any assumptions used in the HRA analysis in the Final MND will be used as the basis for permit conditions and limits. Furthermore, the Proposed Project would be located in close proximity to existing sensitive receptors such as residents and children at the early education center, thereby warranting a I IRA analysis. Benzene. which is a toxic air contaminant. may be emitted from the Proposed Project's gasoline refueling operations. Given SCAQMD staff s concern about the potential health impacts on the residents and children from being exposed to benzene, it is recommended that the Lead Agency evaluate, quantify, and perform a gasoline dispensing station HRM for the Proposed Project in the Final MND. Guidance for performing this HRA can be found in the SCAQMD's L'tni.ssion Im-entoty and Risk Assffsenent Giddelirtrs,far Gasoline Dislrensing Stcitions6. Guidance Regarding Gasoline Dispensing Facilities Sited Near Sensitive Receptors SCAQMD staff recognizes that there are many factors Lead Agencies must consider when making local planning and land use decisions. To facilitate stronger collaboration between Lead Agencies and SCAQMD to reduce community exposure to source -specific and cumulative air pollution impacts, SCAQMD adopted the Guidance Docanzent fir Arldressing Air Qualit-v Issues in General Plans and Local Planning' in 2005. Additional guidance is available in the California Air Resources Board (GARB) Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Corunumin• Health Perspectity, available at: littps://w%vw.arb.ca.gov/cit/liandboo.k.pdf. SCAQMD staff recommends that the Lead Agency review and consider these guidance when malting local planning and land use decisions. ' MND. PAF Page 21 of 92_ a South Coast Air Quality Management District. Accessed at: 1tttP:1rww%v.aymd.govihomoMrmits risk;apsc-ssment. s SCAQMD has developed the; CEQA significance threshold of 10 in one million for cancer risk. When SCAQMD acts as the Lead Agency for its own projects or Responsible Agency for permit projects, SCAQMD staff conducts a HRA, compares the maximum cancer risk to the threshold of 10 in one million to determine the level of significance for health risk impacts, and identifies mitigation measures if the risk is found to be significant. Health risks from operating a gasoline service station must be demonstrated to be below 10 in one million before a permit can be issued. e MND. PDP Page 21 of 92, ' South Coast Air Quality Management District. May 2005, Guidance Dvctonent for Addressing Air Quali(y Issues in General Plans and Local Pla mini. accessed at:httr:iiwtvw.aun!d.gie� home library, documents-support-material:rtannin�- >;uidartcr ��uidanc�•descum�rtt. E1 --E6 Pg140 Page 566 Voll Gralin 3 May 29, 2018 Recommended Change to Mitigation 11feusure 1) CEQA requires that all feasible mitigation pleasures go beyond what is required by lav to minimize any significant impacts. To further reduce criteria pollutant emissions, SCAQMD staff recommends that the Lead Agency incorporate the following change to Mitigation Measure 1), which currently requires the use of construction equipment of 150 horsepower or greater to be CARR Tier 3 or better. SCAQMD staff recommends that the Lead Agency use off-road diesel -powered construction equipment that meets or exceeds the CARS and USEPA Tier 4 off-road emissions standards for equipment rated at 50 horsepower or greater during Project constriction. Such equipment will be outfitted with Best Available Control Technology (BACT) devices including a GARB certified Level 3 Diesel Particulate Filters (DPF). Level 3 DPFs are capable of achieving at least 95 percent reduction in in particulate platter emissions. A list of GARB verified DPFs are available oil the CAR13 websitet'S. SCAQMD staffs recommended change to Mitigation Measure 1) is as follows. 1) During grading activity, all construction equipment (> 4-59 50 horsepower) shall be California Air Resources Board (GARB) Tier 3 4 certified or better. To ensure that Tier 4 construction equipment or better will be used during the construction phase of the Proposed Project. SCAQMD staff recommends that the Lead Agency include this requirement in applicable bid documents and successful contractor(s) must demonstrate the ability to supply such equipment prior to issuance of a grading permitting and any demolition and ground disturbing activities. A copy of each unit's certified tier specification or model year specification and CARB or SCAQMD operating permit (if applicable) shall be available upon request at the time of' mobilization of each applicable unit of equipment. In the event that the Lead Agency finds that Tier 4 construction equipment is not feasible pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15364, the Project representative or contractor(s) must demonstrate the infeasibility by facts supported by substantial evidence before using other technologies/strategies that must be approved by the Lead Agency prior to demolition and ground disturbing activities. Alternative applicable technoiogies'strategies may include, but would not be limited to, Tier 3 construction equipment, reduction in the [umber and/or horsepower rating of constriction equipment, limiting the number of daily construction haul truck trips to and from the Project, using cleaner vehicle fuel, and/or limiting the number of individual construction project phases occurring simultaneously. CaIE&Wod Ketsion 2016.3.2 An older version of CalEEMod (Version 2013.2.2)" was used to quantify the Proposed Project's construction and operational emissions. Updates to CalEEMod (Version 2016.3.2) were available since October 2017. While revising the construction and operational emissions calculations, based on this comments, is not expected to change the less than significant fundings in the HIND, it is recommended that the Lead Agency use the latest version of CalEEMod (Version 2016.3.2) that has been available since the release and public circulation of the MND to quantify the Proposed Project's construction and operational emissions in the Final MND. Closing Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15074, prior to approving the Proposed Project, the Lead Agency shall consider the MND for adoption together with any comments received during the public review MAID. PDF Page 22 of 92. 3 California Air Resources Board. November 16-17,2004. Diesel Off-Roerd Equipment Afeasure -- Workshop. Page 17. Accessed at: httttns.dwutv.arb.ca.guvltnsproiz,'ordicsellpre.4entatign.s�ov16-tit tvorkshop.pff. Ihid. Page IS. MND. Appendix A. OfIEE.tfod Output. E1—E6 Pg 141 Page 567 Tom Grahn 4 May 29, 2418 process. Please provide the SCAQMD with written responses to all comments contained herein prior to the certification of the Final MND. When responding to issues raised in the comments, response should provide sufficient details giving reasons why specific comments and suggestions are not accepted. There should be good faith, reasoned analysis in response. Conclusory statements unsupported by factual information do not facilitate the purpose and goal of CEQA on public disclosure and are not meaningful or useful to decision makers and to the public who are interested in the Proposed Project. SCAQMD staff is available to work with the Lead Agency to address any air quality questions that may arise from this comment letter. Please contact me at IsunOagmd.gov if you have any questions. LS SBC 190508-04 Control Number Sincerely, ze# se;w Lijin Sun, J.D. Program Supervisor, CEQA TGR Planning, Rule Development &: Area Sources El—E6 Pg142 Page 568 Y� ACOUSTI-CS AZ Office 4960 S. Gilbert Rd, Suite 1-461 Chandler, AZ 85249 p. (602) 774-1950 CA Office 1197 Los Angeles Ave, Suite C-256 Simi Valley, CA 93065 9.(805)426-4477 www.mdacoustics.com CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA June 6, 2018 JUN 0 6 2018 Mr. Benny Natanzi RECEIVED - PLANNING 8477 Archibald Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Subject: 8477 Archibald Gas Station/Car Wash Avenue Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Study, City of Rancho Cucamonga, CA Response to Comments — Memo#1 Dear Mr. Natanzi: MD Acoustics, LLC (MD) has been working with the Team that has conducted the 8477 Archibald Gas Station/Car Wash project as it relates to the Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Study. The 8477 Archibald Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Study (AQ/GHG) was prepared- by MIG in August 2016. On May 29, 2018, the City of Rancho Cucamonga (Tom Grahn) received comments from South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for the proposed 8477 Archibald Gas Station/Car Wash project. Comment 1 Permits and Compliance with SCAQMDs Rules Since the Proposed Project involves gasoline service station, a permit from SCAQMD would be required, and SCAQMD should be identified as a Responsible Agency for this Project in the Final MND. Please note that any assumptions in the air quality analysis in the Final MND will be the basis for permit conditions and limits. The Final MND should also demonstrate compliance with SCAQMD Rules, including, but are not limited to, Rule 201— Permit to Construct, Rule 203 — Permit to Operate, and Rule 461— Gasoline Transfer and Dispensing. if there are permitting questions concerning the gasoline service station, they can be directed to SCAQMD Engineering and Permitting staff at (909) 396-2551. Response to Comment 1 As a condition of approval and prior to issuance to building permits, the applicant shall demonstrate compliance to Rule 201 — Permit to Construct and Rule 203 -- Permit to Operate, and Rule 461 — Gasoline Transfer and Dispensing by obtaining proper permits. JN:02681804 Memo#1 1 E1—E6 Pg 143 Page 569 8477 Archibald Gas station/Car Wash Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact study Response to Comments — Memo#1 Comment 2 Air Quality Analysis In the Air Quality analysis, the Lead Agency found that the Proposed Project's regional and localized construction and operational air quality impacts would be less than significant. However, it does not appear that the Air Quality analysis include operational ROG emissions generated from storage tanks or from the fueling process. This may have likely led to an under -estimation of the Proposed Project's operational air quality impacts. it is important to note that while CalEEMod quantifies mobile source emissions (e.g., trip visits by patrons) associated with operating a gasoline service station, CalEEMod does not quantify the operational stationary source emissions from the storage tanks and fueling equipment. Therefore, it is recommended that the Lead Agency use its best efforts to quantify and disclose operational emissions from the fueling process in the Final MND. Response to Comment 2 The comment above states that "the Air Quality Analysis did not include emissions generated from the operation of the gasoline service station (CalEEMod does not quantify emissions from storage tanks or from the fueling process)". As shown in Appendix A of the AQ/GHG, the air quality impacts from both the construction and the operation of the gas station (part of the convenience market) were analyzed via the land use of Convenience Market With Gas Pumps, using the size and metric of 1.74 thousand square feet respectively. Emissions from the dispensing of gasoline from the gas pumps were not analyzed as the gas station is subject to SCAQMD permitting requirements (as detailed above) and SCAQMD Rule 461. Furthermore, according to the ARB's Attachment 1: Revised Emission Factors for Phase 11 Vehicle Fueling at California Gasoline Dispensing Facilities (12/23/2013), indicates that Phase II EVR (enhanced vapor recovery) systems have an average efficiency of 95.1% (Table 11-3). The referenced document is located in Appendix A. According to the ARB's: Revised Emission Factors for Gasoline Marketing Operations at California Gasoline Dispensing Facilities (12/23/2013), indicates that Phase I EVR systems have an average efficiency of 98% (page 3. 2nd paragraph). The referenced document is located in Appendix B. As stated within the referenced ARB documents, both Phase I and Phase ii EVR systems have a minimum 95.1% efficiency at capturing emissions. Emission inventory is based upon two (2) factors: 8.4 lbs of TOG per thousand gallons dispensed (lbs/kgal) and 0.74 lbs/kgal for Gasoline Dispensing Facilities with Phase II pre-EVR vapor recovery. These factors are based upon pre-EVR vapor recovery systems. Assuming a 95% vapor recovery rate, the majority of the emissions would be captured and the additional VOCs that would potentially escape these mandatory recovery systems is anticipated to be relatively small. To fully understand the emissions, the estimated number of gallons per year would need to be provided. Per Table 11 from the AQ/GHG report, the project's operational VOC emissions are 7.41 lbs/day. Even if an additional 7.41 lbs/day (the uncontrolled [no ORVR or phase [I] vehicle fueling emission factor for each 1,000 gallons pumped) were added to the project's operational VOC emissions), the emissions would still be IN:02681804 Memo#1 2 E1—E6 Pg144 Page 570 8477 Archibald Gas Station/Car Wash Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Study Response to Comments --Memo#1 well below the SCAQMD's operational threshold of significance of 55 lbs per day for VOC. The vehicle fueling emissions factor with ORVR and Phase II EVR in place is 0.021 lbs per thousand gallons. Both ORVR and Phase II EVRs are required per regulation in California and the gas pumps at the project site would have to pump over a million gallons of fuel per day to exceed the daily VOC threshold. Therefore, no additional analysis or mitigation is required. Comment 3 Health Risk Assessment In the MND, the Lead Agency stated that an HRA analysis is not required for the Proposed Project because the Proposed Project does not include use of stationary emergency or prime compression ignition internal combustion engines, portable diesel engines or other equipment subject to AB2588. SCAQMD staff disagrees with the analysis. Enacted in 1987, AB2588 is an air toxics hot spots program and requires stationary sources to report the types and quantities of certain substances routinely released into the air. An AB2588 Air Toxics Hot Spot Health Risk Assessment (HRA) estimates potential health risks over a lifetime of exposure from air toxics for existing facilities (Emphasis added) pursuant to SCAQMD Rule 1402 and does not apply to new or planned facilities. Here, the Proposed Project is a new or planned gasoline service facility that is subject to the requirements of SCAQMD Rule 1401. Therefore, AB2588 HRA should not be used as a screening tool to determine if a HRA analysis is warranted for the Proposed Project. Moreover, since the operation of gasoline stations will emit air toxics, HRAs are required as part of the SCAQMD permitting requirements for gasoline stations. Any assumptions used in the HRA analysis in the Final MND will be used as the basis for permit conditions and limits. Furthermore, the Proposed Project would be located in close proximity to existing sensitive receptors such as residents and children at the early education center, thereby warranting a HRA analysis. Benzene, which is a toxic air contaminant, may be emitted from the Proposed Project's gasoline refueling operations. Given SCAQMD staff's concern about the potential health impacts on the residents and children from being exposed to benzene, it is recommended that the Lead Agency evaluate, quantify, and perform a gasoline dispensing station HRA for the Proposed Project in the Final MND. Guidance for performing this HRA can be found in the SCAQMD's Emission Inventory and Risk Assessment Guidelines for Gasoline Dispensing Stations. Resnonse to Comment 3 No gas station analysis was warranted as the closest sensitive receptor (northern property line) to the fuel pumps (or even the gas station canopy)'is over 61 feet (18 meters) and the storage tanks are 91: feet from any source of potential gasoline or diesel fumes. Furthermore, the early education center building facade (location where the nearest sensitive receptors_ reside) is located 240 feet from the canopy and 275 feet from the storage tanks (See attached PDF of 8477 Archibald Gas Station/ Car Wash overlaid on Google Earth (see Appendix C). Section 6.4.1 of the technical air quality and greenhouse study qualitatively evaluates the toxic air contaminants for the proposed project. This response further quantifies the emissions based on 1N:02681804 Memo#1 3 E1—E6 Pg 145 Page 571 8477Archibald Gas Station/Car (Nash Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Study Response to Comments — Memo#1 estimated number of gallons per year at the proposed project. The project proposes to sale approximately 1.68 million gallons per year. By SCAQMD's own admission in their comment above, CARB (and CAPCOA) recommend a 50 -foot separation between gas stations and sensitive receptors; therefore, the 61 foot separation from the canopy and 91 feet from the underground tanks should be more than adequate. Furthermore, the attached (Appendix D) SCAQMD gasoline station HRA screening tables show that the MICR at residential receptors 25 meters from the fuel source (underground tanks) for a typical gas station would have 3.108 in a million for 1 million gallons of fuel. As previously mentioned, the project is proposing 1.68 million gallons of throughput a year which would equate to an MOR of 5.22 in a million; (which is a reasonable assumption given the size of the project and number of pumps). The MICR threshold is 10 in one million. As shown quantitatively, the project would not exceed the MICR 10 in one million. rf1T7mant a Guidance Regarding Gasoline Dispensing Facilities Sited Near Sensitive Receptors SCAQMD staff recognizes that there are many factors Lead Agencies must consider when making local planning and land use decisions. To facilitate stronger collaboration between Lead Agencies and SCAQMD to reduce community exposure to source -specific and cumulative air pollution impacts, SCAQMD adopted the Guidance Document for Addressing Air Quality Issues in General Plans and Local Planning in 2005. Additional guidance is available in the California Air Resources Board (CARE) Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health Perspective, available at: https_/Zwww/arb/ca/gov/ch/handbook.pdf. SCAQMD staff recommends that the Lead Agency review and consider these guidance when making local planning and land use decisions. Response to Comment 4 There is at least a 61 to 91 -foot separation between the gas station and storage tanks and the closest sensitive receptor. See response to Comment 3 above. Comment 5 Recommended Change to Mitigation Measure 1) CEQA requires that all feasible mitigation measures go beyond what is required by law to minimize any significant impacts. To further reduce criteria pollutant emissions, SCAQMD staff recommends that the Lead Agency incorporate the following change to Mitigation Measure 1), which currently requires the use of construction equipment of 150 horsepower or greater to be CARB Tier 3 or better. SCAQMD staff recommends that the Lead Agency use off-road diesel -powered construction equipment that meets or exceeds the CARE and USEPA Tier 4 off-road emissions standards for equipment rated at 50 horsepower or greater during Project construction. Such equipment will be outfitted with Best Available Control Technology (BACT) devices including a CARB certified Level 3 Diesel Particulate Filters (DPF). Level 3 DPFs are capable of achieving at least 85 percent reduction in in particulate matter 1N:02681804 Merno#1 4 El—E6 Pg146 Page 572 8477 Archibald Gas StationfCarWash Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Study Response to Comments - Memo#1 emissions. A list of CARB verified DPFs are available on the CARB website. SCAQMD staff's recommended change to Mitigation Measure 1) is as follows. 1) During grading activity, all construction equipment (> 150 50 horsepower) shall be California Air Resources Board (CARB) Tier 3 4 certified or better. To ensure that Tier 4 construction equipment or better will be used during the construction phase of the Proposed Project, SCAQMD staff recommends that the Lead Agency include this requirement in applicable bid documents and successful contractor(s) must demonstrate the ability to supply such equipment prior to issuance of a grading permitting and any demolition and ground disturbing activities. A copy of each unit's certified tier specification or model year specification and CARB or SCARMD operating permit (if applicable) shall be available upon request at the time of mobilization of each applicable unit of equipment. In the event that the Lead Agency finds that Tier 4 construction equipment is not feasible pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15364, the Project representative or contractor(s) must demonstrate the infeasibility by facts supported by substantial evidence before using other technologies/strategies that must be approved by the Lead Agency prior to demolition and ground disturbing activities. Alternative applicable technologies/strategies may include, but would not be limited to, Tier 3 construction equipment, reduction in the number and/or horsepower rating of construction equipment, limiting the number of daily construction haul truck trips to and from the Project, using cleaner vehicle fuel, and/or limiting the number of individual construction project phases occurring simultaneously. Response to Comment 5 The technical air quality and greenhouse gas study shows that even without the implementation of the Tier 3 (or Tier 4) equipment, the emissions are below SCAQMD's thresholds of significance at the regional and localized level. The modeling evaluated the project using Tier 0 and which shows that the project complies with the thresholds of significance. The 15 -MND implemented a. mitigation measure during grading (Tier 3 equipment) that goes above and beyond what is necessary to meet SCAQMD's thresholds of significance during construction. As shown within the technical air quality and greenhouse gas study the mitigation measure goes above and beyond what is required. Therefore, the mitigation measure 1 is sufficient or not required at all. Comment 6 CaIEEMod Verrson 2016.3.2 An older version of CalEEMod (Version 2013.2.2) was used_ to quantify the Proposed Project's construction and operational emissions. Updates to CalEEMod (Version 2016.3.2) were available since October 2017. While revising the construction and operational emissions calculations, based on this comments, is not expected to change the less than significant findings in the MND, it is recommended that the Lead Agency use the latest version of CalEEMod (Version 2016.3.2) that has been available IN.,02681804 Memo#.1 5 El —E6 Pg T 47 Page 573 8477 Archibald Gas Station/Cor Wash Air quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Study Response to Comments — Memo#1 since the release and public circulation of the MND to quantify the Proposed Project's construction and operational emissions in the Final MND. Response to Comment 6 During the time when the technical air quality and greenhouse gas study was performed only the older version of CalEEMod (Version 2013.2.2) was publicly available. Furthermore, by SCAQMD's own admission, "revising the construction and operational emissions calculations, based on this comments, is not expected to change the less than significant findings in the MND", will not change the findings of significance. Therefore, the CalEEMod modeling as conducted is sufficient at determining the project's emissions. MD is pleased to provide this response to comments (Memo#1) to SCAQMD's comments. If you have any questions call our office at (805) 426-4477. Sincerely, MD Acoustics, LLC Wa-D Mike Dickerson, INCE Principal JN:02681804 Memo#1 El --)_6 Pg 148 Page 574 8477 Archibald Gas Station/Car Wash Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Study Response to Comments — Memo#1 JN:02681804 Memo#1 Appendix A Revised Emission Factors for Phase li Vehicle Fueling at California Gasoline Dispensing Facilities E1—F6 Pg 149 Page 575 Environmental Pr tdrtion Agency AIR RESOURCES BOARD Monitoring and Laboratory Division Attachment 1: Revised Emission Factors for Phase II Vehicle Fueling at California Gasoline Dispensing Facilities December 23, 2013 This report has been reviewed by the staff of the California Air Resources Board and approved for publication. Approval does not signify that the contents necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Air Resources Board, nor does the mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. E1—E6 Pg150 Page 576 Table of Contents Page I. INTRODUCTION 1 ll. METHODOLOGY - REVISED VEHICLE REFUELING 2 EMISSION FACTORS III. REFERENCES S List of Tables Table 1-1: Current and Revised Vehicle Refueling Emission Factors 1 Table 1-2: Percent Gasoline Dispensed to ORVR Vehicles in California 2 Table 11-1: Vapor Recovery Emission Test Results for Summer RVP Fuel 4 Vehicle Fueling UEF Table 11-2: Vapor Recovery Emission Test Results for Winter RVP Fuel 4 Vehicle Fueling UEF Table II -3: Phase 11 EVR In -use Efficiency Test Results 6 E1—E6 Pg151 Page 577 I. INTRODUCTION Vehicle fueling emissions occur when gasoline vapors are displaced by rising liquid in the vehicle fuel tank during gasoline dispensing. These vapors are adsorbed in a carbon canister installed on vehicles equipped with an on board refueling vapor recovery system (ORVR). When fueling non-ORVR vehicles, these vapors can be collected by a Phase II vapor recovery system and returned to the gasoline dispensing facility (GDF) storage tank. Without a Phase ll vapor recovery system, the vapors displaced from fueling non-ORVR vehicles are uncontrolled and released to the atmosphere. The current Air Resources Board (ARB) total organic gases (TOG) emission factors for GDFs, in use since May 1999, do not reflect improvements in Phase II vapor recovery system performance achieved by ARB's enhanced vapor recovery (EVR) program or the widespread penetration of ORVR in the vehicle fleet. Therefore, the current GDF emission factors for uncontrolled and controlled gasoline dispensing are representative of non-ORVR vehicles only. ARB staff has conducted field tests, literature research, and data analyses to account for these advances, resulting in the proposed revisions to the vehicle fueling emission factors presented in Table 1-1 below. Table 1-1 Current and Revised Vehicle Fueling Emission Factors Ibslkgal Category Emission Factors Current Revised Uncontrolled Emission Factor (No ORVR, No Phase 11) 8.4 8.4 ORVR without Phase II NA 0.42 ORVR with Phase II pre-EVR NA 0.12 ORVR with'Phase II EVR NA 0.021 No ORVR with Phase II pre-EVR 0.74 2.4 No ORVR with Phase II EVR NA 0.42 As shown in Table 1-1, ARB's current vehicle fueling emissions inventory is based on two emission factors: 8.4 pounds of TOG per thousand gallons dispensed (Ibslkgal) for GDFs with uncontrolled vehicle fueling and 0.74 Ibslkgal for GDFs with Phase 11 pre- EVR vapor recovery. ARB's test results suggest that the uncontrolled emission factor (UEF) remains unchanged, but new or revised emission factors are needed to account for various levels of control efficiency resulting from different combinations of Phase 11 vapor recovery systems and ORVR technology, as well as improved Phase Il vapor recovery system performance from implementation of ARB's EVR program. E:1—i;6 Pg 152 Page 578 ARB estimates that approximately 74 percent of the gasoline sold in California in 2013 will be dispensed to ORVR vehicles. With the current regulatory requirements for Phase 11 vapor recovery systems remaining in place, there will be a continuing decline in vehicle fueling emissions as the volume of fuel dispensed to ORVR vehicles increases. Table 1-2 projects the gasoline fraction expected to be dispensed statewide to ORVR vehicles in calendar years 2013 through 2028 based on ARB's model for on -road mobile sources (EMFAC2011). Table 1-2 Percent Gasoline Dispensed to ORVR Vehicles in California Calendar Gasoline Dispensed to Year ORVR Vehicles Calendar Year Gasoline Dispensed to ORVR Vehicles 2013 74 2021 88 2014 76 2022 88 2015 78 2023 89 2016 80 2024 90 2017 82 2025 91 2018 83 2026 91 2019 85 2027 92 2020 87 2028 93 11. METHODOLOGY - REVISED VEHICLE FUELING EMISSION FACTORS The method used to develop the revised vehicle fueling emission factors consists,of determining an uncontrolled vehicle fueling emission factor (UEF) and then applying control efficiency (CE) factors that are representative of each possible combination of vapor recovery control technologies. For example, the combined CE when both ORVR and Phase 11 vapor recovery systems are in use is calculated as: ORVR with Phase Ii = 1 - (1 - ORVR CE) * (1 - Phase II CE) DETERMINATION OF UEF Vehicle_ Fueling UEF The vehicle fueling UEF was determined from field data collected by ARB staff during various Phase II vapor recovery system efficiency tests. The tests were performed using the equipment and procedures specified in the version of ARB Vapor Recovery Test Procedure TP -201.2, Efficiency and Emission Factor for Phase 11 Systems in effect at the time each test was performed. 2 E1—E6 Pg153 Page 579 All fueling events used for the determination of the UEF were conducted on non-ORVR vehicles. To minimize any bias introduced by the fueling of ORVR vehicles, only data from non-ORVR vehicles for which the preceding test vehicle was also a non-ORVR vehicle were used. (This was necessary because fueling an ORVR vehicle reduces the vapor concentration at the vapor return line sampling location, which causes a low bias in the vapor return mass. for a subsequent fueling, even of a non-ORVR vehicle.) Data used to calculate the vehicle fueling UEF are presented in Table II -1 and Table II -2. Table 11-1 summarizes data from eight tests used to calculate the vehicle fueling UEF for summer RVP fuel. Seven tests consisted of Phase 11 vapor recovery system efficiency tests in which 6,350 gallons of gasoline were dispensed to non-ORVR vehicles. The remaining test was an uncontrolled vehicle fueling emissions test in which 62 gallons of gasoline were dispensed to six non-ORVR vehicles at a GDF without Phase II vapor recovery. The average vehicle fueling UEF for summer RVP fuel determined from the eight tests is 7.65 Ibslkgal. Table II -2 summarizes data from the three tests used to calculate the vehicle fueling UEF for winter RVP fuel. 1n the first test, 1065 gallons of gasoline were dispensed t& 101 non-ORVR vehicles at a GDF equipped with a Phase 11 vapor recovery system. The second test was an uncontrolled vehicle fueling emissions test performed by dispensing 460 gallons of gasoline to 41 non-ORVR vehicles at a GDF with a disabled Phase 11 vapor recovery system. The third test was an uncontrolled vehicle fueling emissions test performed by dispensing 116 gallons of gasoline to 10 non-ORVR vehicles at a GDF without Phase II vapor recovery. The average vehicle fueling UEF for winter RVP fuel determined from the three tests is 9.50 Ibslkgal. The annual vehicle fueling UEF is calculated by weighting the average summer and winter RVP fuel UEFs for statewide gasoline throughput during the respective summer and winter periods. The California State Board of Equalization (BOE) reported approximately 14.51 billion gallons of gasoline were dispensed statewide to motor vehicles in 2012.' Of the total, approximately 8.59 billion gallons, or 59.2 percent, of gasoline was dispensed during the April through October summer RVP fuel period. The remaining 5.92 billion gallons, or 40.8 percent, was dispensed during the January through March and November through December winter RVP fuel periods. Based on the BOE throughput data, the vehicle fueling UEF, weighted for seasonal variation in statewide gasoline throughput, is calculated using the following equation: Vehicle Fueling UEF = Summer Fuel UEF*(59.2%) + Winter Fuel UEF*(40.8%) = 7.65 Ibslkgal*(0.592) + 9.50 Ibslkgal*(0.408) = 8.4lbslkgal Based on ARB test results, the average annual vehicle fueling UEF is 8.4 Ibslkgal, which equals the UEF estimated in the previous methodology. 3 E1—E6 Pg 154 Page 580 Note: 2000 ISOR — Initial Statement of Reasons for Proposed Amendments to the Vapor Recovery Certification and Test Procedures for Gasoline Loading and Motor Vehicle Refueling at Service Stations Table V-11, page 93. Table II -1 Vapor Recovery Emission Test Results for Summer RVP Fuel Vehicle Fueling UEF Vapor Recovery System Purpose of Test Location Date _ File Number Number of Fuelings Gallons Dispensed Vapor Mass (Ibsx1000) UEF (Ibslkgal) Hirt Certification Sacramento Apr 1996 2000 ISOR 100 679 4535 6.68 Catlow Certification Sacramento Sep 1996 2000 ISOR 100 842 6732 8.00 Healy Certification Sacramento Sep 1996 2000 ISOR 100 939 6914 7.36 Hasstech Certification Sacramento Aug 1997 2000 ISOR 100 1012 9509 9.40 Healy Certification Sacramento Jun 1998 2000 ISOR 100 886 5712 6.45 Saber Certification Sacramento Apr 1999 2000 ISOR 100 981 6465 6.59 OPW Certification Sacramento Jul 1999 2000 ISOR 100 1012 8836 8.73 No Phase 11 Research San Jose July 2007 1 ST -08-12 6 61.6 1 354.4 1 5.75 Overall Summer RVP Fuel Results: 6412.6 1 49057 1 7.65 Note: 2000 ISOR — Initial Statement of Reasons for Proposed Amendments to the Vapor Recovery Certification and Test Procedures for Gasoline Loading and Motor Vehicle Refueling at Service Stations Table V-11, page 93. Note: VOC Testing — Phase II vapor recovery efficiency test performed by VOC Testing, an ARB certified independent tester. El Page 581 Table II -2 Vapor Recovery Emission Test Results for Winter RVP Fuel Vehicle Fueling UEF Vapor Purpose of Number of Gallons Vapor UEF Recovery Test Location Date File Number Fuelings Dispensed Mass (Ibslkgal) System Ibsx1000 Healy Certification Folsom Nov 1997 VOC Testing 101 1065.3 10091.5 9.47 Disabled Research Sacramento Dec 1999 ST -99-50 41 459.7 4438.4 9.65 No Phase 11 1 Research San Jose Dec 2007 ST -08-13 10 115.8 1065.6 9.20 ' Overall Winter RVP Fuel Results: 1640.8 15595.5 9.50 Note: VOC Testing — Phase II vapor recovery efficiency test performed by VOC Testing, an ARB certified independent tester. El Page 581 DETERMINIATION OF CE ORVR CE The revised vehicle fueling emission factors assume 95 percent in -use CE for ORVR systems, based on the ORVR certification performance standard of 95 percent. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) test data suggests greater than 95 percent in -use CE for ORVR system s.2, 3 However, U.S. EPA tests were performed on ORVR vehicles less than three model years old. Because data on longer-term efficiency of ORVR systems were not presented, ARB staff determined that the 95 percent certification performance standard represents the most conservative in -use CE for ORVR vehicles. Phase II Pre-EVR CE The revised vehicle refueling emission factors assume 71 percent in -use CE for Phase 11 pre-EVR systems, based primarily on results from a study conducted in 2000 by the San Diego County Air Pollution Control District (SDCAPCD) and data provided by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). Phase II pre-EVR systems are required to achieve at least 95 percent efficiency during certification testing. However, the SDCAPCD study found that in -use Phase 11 pre-EVR balance systems were prone to malfunctions (e.g., hose blockages, nozzle faceplate gaps, and dispenser leaks) that resulted in a lower in -use control efficiency of approximately 70 percent, with 11 percent of the nozzles experiencing full system failure.4 Data provided by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) shows that, as of 2006 (prior to the upgrade to Phase 11 EVR) about 92 percent of Phase I1 pre- EVR systems were balance systems and 8 percent were assist systems.5 To calculate the in -use CE of assist systems, ARB staff assumed that assist nozzles experience complete failure at the same rate (11 percent) reported for balance systems in the SDCAPCD report referenced above. However, assist systems, based on the way they operate are not expected to experience partial failures as reported for balance systems. Therefore, 11 percent of Phase II pre-EVR assist systems were assumed to have 0 percent efficiency due to an equipment failure such as a failed vapor pump, or a complete blockage in the vapor return line. The efficiency of the remaining 89 percent of assist systems was assumed to be 95 percent. Based on the SDCAPCD and SCAQMD data, and the stated assumptions for Phase 11 pre-EVR assist systems, the Phase li pre-EVR CE is calculated using the following equation: Phase II Pre-EVR CE = 0.92 * (Balance CE) + 0.08 (0.89 * Assist CE) =0.92*70%+0.08*0.89*95%=71% Phase 11 EVR CE The revised vehicle fueling emission factors assume 95 percent in -use CE for Phase it EVR systems, based on both the certification performance standard of 95 percent and the results from thirteen separate in -use efficiency tests of Phase 11 EVR assist systems. Approximately 70 percent of Phase II EVR systems installed at California GDFs are 5 E1 --E6 Pg156 Page 582 assist systems. Phase II EVR in -use efficiency data was collected using the equipment and procedures referenced in the version of ARB Vapor Recovery Test Procedure TP - 201.2, Efficiency and Emission Factor for Phase 1i Systems, in effect at the time each test was performed. The thirteen efficiency tests represent 221 non-ORVR vehicle fueling events. Table 11-3 summarizes results from the thirteen in -use efficiency tests of Phase II EVR assist Systems. The tests determined an average in -use efficiency of 95.1 percent for 221 non-ORVR fueling events. In addition, GD Fs with Phase II EVR and throughputs above 600,000 gallons per year are required to install ARB certified in -station diagnostic (ISD) systems designed to alert GDF operators when critical parameters that affect efficiency do not comply with ISD performance criteria. If the operator ignores ISD warning alarms, ISD will suspend fueling. This requirement helps ensure a high level of emissions control for Phase 11 EVR systems and supports the assumption of a 95 percent overall CE. DETERMINATION OF EMISSION FACTORS ORVR without Phase Il Vapor Recovery Emission Factor The revised emission factor for fueling ORVR vehicles at GDFs without Phase ll vapor recovery systems is calculated from the UEF and ORVR CE using the following equation: E1—E6 Pg157 Page 583 Table II -3 Phase II EVR In -Use Efficle cy Test Results Test Site Date Nan-ORVR Vehicle Fueling Events Phase II EVR Efficiency Arco Fruitridge 12/15/2008 13 93.2% Arco Fruitridge 12/16/2008 15 91.2% Arco Fruitridge 12/17/2008 16 91.0% Arco Fruitridge 12/17/2008 11 97.2% Arco Northgate 1/5/2009 15 91.7% Arco Northgate 1!612009 15 95.8% Arco Northgate 1/6/2009 15 97.8% Arco Northgate 1/8/2009 15 98.5% Arco Northgate 1/8/2009 16 95.2% Arco North 1/26/2010 25 94.2% Arco Harbour 3!912010 22 98.2% Arco North 7/12/2010 21 95.8% Arco Harbour 9/27/2010 22 96.8% Total Test Events: 221 Average Efficiency; 95.1% DETERMINATION OF EMISSION FACTORS ORVR without Phase Il Vapor Recovery Emission Factor The revised emission factor for fueling ORVR vehicles at GDFs without Phase ll vapor recovery systems is calculated from the UEF and ORVR CE using the following equation: E1—E6 Pg157 Page 583 ORVR w/o Phase II = UEF * (1 - ORVR CE) = 8.4 lbs/kgal * (1 - 0.95) = 0.42 Ibslkgal ORVR with Phase 11 re-EVR Emission Factor The revised emission factor for fueling ORVR vehicles at GDFs with Phase II pre-EVR systems is calculated from the UEF, ORVR CE, and Phase 11 pre-EVR CE using the following equation: ORVR wl Phase II EVR = UEF * 0 - ORVR CE) * (1 - Phase Il pre-EVR CE) 8.4 Ibslkgal * (1 - 0.95) * (1 - 0.71) = 0.12 Ibslkgal ORVR with Phase it EVR Emission Factor The revised emission factor for fueling ORVR vehicles at GDFs with Phase f 1 EVR systems is calculated from the UEF, ORVR CE, and Phase Ii EVR CE using the following equation: ORVR w/ Phase 11 EVR = UEF * (1 - ORVR CE) * (1 - Phase II EVR CE) 8.4 Ibslkgal * (1 - 0.95) * (1 - 0.95) = 0.021 lbs/kgal Non-ORVR with Phase II re-EVR Emission Factor The revised emission factor for fueling non-ORVR vehicles at GDFs with Phase II pre- EVR systems is calculated from the UEF and Phase II pre-EVR CE using the following equation: Non-ORVR w/ Phase II pre-EVR = UEF * (1 - Phase II pre-EVR CE) = 8.4 Ibslkgal * (1 - 0.71) = 2.4 Ibslkgal Non-ORVR with Phase II EVR Emission Factor The revised emission factor forfueling non-ORVR vehicles at GDFs with Phase 11 EVR systems is calculated from the UEF and Phase II EVR CE using the following equation: Non-ORVR w/ Phase 11 EVR = UEF * (1 - Phase EVR II CE) = 8.4 lbs/kgal * (1 - 0.95) = 0.42 Ibslkgal 7 E=1 --E=6 Pg158 Page 584 Ill. REFERENCES 1. California State Board of Equalization Fuel Taxes and Statistics Report -2012. fittp://www.hoe.ca.gov/sptaxprog/spftrptsl 2.htm 2. SHED test data for 337 2004-2005 model vehicles is available from David Good, U.S. EPA Office of Air and Radiation, Office of Transportation and Air Quality, Compliance Information Systems. 3. NESCAUM Report — Onboard Refueling Vapor Recovery Systems Analysis of Widespread Use, pages 9-10, Skelton and Rector, 812012007. 4. Barnard R. McEntire, Performance of Balance Vapor Recovery Systems at Gasoline Dispensing Facilities, San Diego Air Pollution Control District, May 18, 2000. 5. Data on 2006 Balance/Assist Split for Pre-EVR systems provided to Frances Cameron by South Coast Air Quality Management District Staff El —E6 Pg 159 Page 585 8477 Archibald Gas Station/Car Wash Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact study Response to Comments — Memo#1 JN:02681804 Memo#1 Appendix B Revised Emission Factors for Gasoline Marketing Operations at California Gasoline Dispensing Facilities EI—E6 Pg 160 Page 586 Environmental Protection Agency +=AIR RESOURCES BOARD Monitoring and Laboratory Division Revised Emission Factors for Gasoline Marketing Operations at California Gasoline Dispensing Facilities December 23, 2013 This report has been reviewed by the staff of the California Air Resources Board and approved for publication. Approval does not signify that the contents necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Air Resources Board, nor does the mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. El—E6 Pg 161 Page 587 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author wishes to acknowledge the contributions by Gurjeet Bains, Frances Cameron, Basharat Iqbal, John Marconi, Jason McPhee and Frederick Medina, of the Air Resources Board Monitoring and Laboratory Division, in developing the emission factors presented in this proposal. In addition, thanks to Manjit Ahuja, Ranjit Bhullar, Cynthia Castronovo and George Lew for their editorial and technical review of the draft document. The author also wishes to give special acknowledgement to Gabriel Ruiz of the Air Resources Board Air Quality Planning and Science Division for his significant contributions in the review and editing of the draft emission factor document. E1—E6 Pg 162 Page 588 Table of Contents List of Tables Table 1-1: Current and Revised TOG Emission Factors for Gasoline Page I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 II. INTRODUCTION 3 III. PHASE 11 FUELING - NON-ORVR AND ORVR VEHICLES - 5 IV. PHASE I BULK TRANSFER LOSSES 7 V. PRESSURE DRIVEN LOSSES 9 A PHASE II FUELING — SPILLAGE 10 VII. GASOLINE DISPENSING HOSE PERMEATION 11 VIII. CONCLUSIONS 13 lX. REFERENCES 15 List of Tables Table 1-1: Current and Revised TOG Emission Factors for Gasoline 2 Dispensing Facilities Table III -I: Current and Revised TOG Emission Factors for Vehicle 6 Refueling Emissions at Gasoline Dispensing Facilities Table IV -1: Current and 'Revised TOG Emission Factors for Phase 1 8 Transfer Emissions at Gasoline Dispensing Facilities Table V-1: Current and Revised TOG Emission Factors for Pressure 9 Driven Emissions from Gasoline Dispensing Facilities Table VI -I: Current and Revised TOG Emission Factors for Gasoline 11 Spillage at Gasoline Dispensing Facilities Table VII -I: Year 2013 and 2017 Hose Permeation TOG Emission Factors 13 for Gasoline Dispensing Facilities 1=1—E6 Pg163 Page 589 Table of Contents (cont.) List of Figures Figure 11-I: Phase I, Phase I1 and Onboard Vapor Recovery Systems 3 Figure VII -1: Cutaways of Vapor Recovery GDF Hose Assemblies Showing 12 Vapor and Liquid Paths Attachments Attachment 1: Revised Emission Factors for Phase 11 Vehicle Fueling at California Gasoline Dispensing Facilities Attachment 2: Revised Emission Factors for Phase I Gasoline Bulk Transfer at California Gasoline Dispensing Facilities Attachment 3: Revised Emission Factors for Pressure Driven Emissions at California Gasoline Dispensing Facilities Attachment 4: Revised Emission Factors for Gasoline Spillage at California Gasoline Dispensing Facilities Attachment 5: Proposed Emission Factors for Gasoline Dispensing Hose Permeation at California Gasoline Dispensing Facilities E1 --E6 Pg 164 Page 590 I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Gasoline marketing operations in California presently distribute approximately 15 billion gallons of gasoline per year' to motor vehicles, fuel containers, and gasoline -powered equipment. Hydrocarbon emissions, which are ozone precursors, can occur at several points during transfer, storage, or vehicle refueling as gasoline vapors are displaced from underground storage tanks (UST) or from vehicle fuel tanks. Vapor recovery systems are used to control emissions from California gasoline dispensing facilities (GDF). Phase I vapor recovery systems collect vapors displaced from an UST when a cargo tank truck delivers gasoline to a GDF, Phase II vapor recovery systems collect vapors displaced during storage or dispensing of gasoline. The Phase I and Phase ll systems at a GDF work in combination with vapor recovery systems in vehicles and at gasoline loading terminals to control approximately 370 tons per day of hydrocarbon emission s2 from California gasoline marketing operations. The Air Resources Board (ARB) is in the process of updating the emissions inventory for GDFs. This category is currently composed of four subcategories associated with gasoline storage and transfer operations from cargo tank trucks to GDFs and from GDFs to vehicles, fuel containers, and gasoline -powered equipment. Total organic gas (TOG) emission factors for the four current GDF marketing subcategories were adopted in May 1999 and do not account for advances in vapor recovery system performance achieved through implementation of ARB's enhanced vapor recovery (EVR) program; nor do they reflect the interaction between vapor recovery systems installed at California GDFs and vehicles equipped with onboard refueling vapor recovery (ORVR). Approximately 74 percent of gasoline dispensed statewide in 2013 will be to ORVR vehicles. Therefore, the purpose of this document is to pr'esent revised emission factors for four current gasoline marketing subcategories and two new subcategories developed since 1999. Current subcategories: i. Phase 11 Fueling - Non-ORVR Vehicles ii. Phase i Transfer Losses iii. Pressure Driven Losses iv. Phase II Fueling - Spillage New subcategories: V. Phase it Fueling - ORVR Vehicles vi. Gasoline Dispensing Hose Permeation This document describes the methodologies used to develop new or revised emission factors for the six GDF subcategories. The revised TOG emission factors are presented in Table I-1, along. with the emission factors currently in use. The emission factors are segregated into three tiers, each representing varying degrees of vapor recovery equipment control: no vapor recovery system, or uncontrolled emission factor (UEF); E1 --E6 Pg165 Page 591 Phase I and Phase II vapor recovery systems predating enhanced vapor recovery (Pre- EVR); and enhanced Phase I and Phase Il vapor recovery systems (EVR). Table 1-1 Current and Revised TOG Emission Factors for Gasoline Dispensing Facilities Sub Category Currenta (lbslkgal)e Revised (lbslkgal)b UEF UEF Pyre-EVR EV$R�54 Phase ll Fueling y 44�., W /Pre-EVR Y� s'y.�1 � Ate:OfH i 'f h%F;1Y31 Non-ORVR Vehicles 8.4 0.74 8.4 2.4 0.42 ORVR Vehicles NA NA 0.42 0.12 0.021 Phase i Bulk Transfer Losses 8.4 0.42 7.7 0.38 0.15 Pressure Driven Losses 0.84 0.1 0.76 0.092 0.024 Phase 11 Fueling - Spillage 0.64 0.42 0.61 0.42 0.24 Gasoline Dispensing Hose Permeation,YSYS��,�`lI x iGp sl. �t k� EM S? -� t. 9915 Mfe '9 Year 2013 NA NA 0.062 0.062 0.062 Year 2017' NA NA 0.009 0.009 0.009 Notes: a Current emission factors adopted May 1999, and predate EVR. b Pounds TOG emitted per thousand gallons dispensed or transferred. UEF - Uncontrolled emission factor. No Phase I vapor recovery system for bulk transfer emissions, no Phase 11 vapor recovery system for all other subcategories. Pre-EVR - Phase 1 pre-EVR system for bulk transfer emissions, Phase Il pre-EVR system for all other subcategories. EVR - Phase I EVR system for bulk transfer emissions, Phase II EVR system for all other subcategories. NA - No current applicable emission factor. El—E6 Pg 166 Page 592 II. INTRODUCTION: Vapor recovery systems are installed at GDFs to collect gasoline vapors that would otherwise escape into the atmosphere. Gasoline vapor emissions at GDFs are controlled in two phases. Phase I vapor recovery collects vapors displaced from an UST when a cargo tank truck delivers gasoline to a GDF. Phase II vapor recovery collects vapors displaced during the transfer of gasoline from a GDF to a vehicle, fuel container, or gasoline -powered equipment-, and the storage of gasoline at a GDF. ARB regulations establish standards for the level of emissions control vapor recovery systems must achieve during the transfer and storage of gasoline. All vapor recovery systems must undergo certification tests to demonstrate compliance with performance standards before they can be sold, offered for sale, or installed in California. Figure II -1 illustrates the interaction between Phase 1, Phase 11 and onboard vapor recovery systems. Figure II -I: Phase 1, Phase II and Onboard Vapor Recovery Systems PHASEI PHASclI..-i _I Fra;.ura`/a:uum gem Vals E't'RIFh�se 11 ORVR j rs:n _ �NAVId tilapm I •+Plaslu,.lLmato' � •� Ratum 1 dnj,aniv U Su9neer�3J Fri L in+ Pahl ;' j ;• - tianwmPjn:! -�. -. - .... -, - : •�—' ,.�- `i apo, Ratcna%: l.l'Zuld 15-u a -e ` UST . Vapor recovery system performance standards for GDFs have become more stringent over the years. Since 2001, ARB has adopted a number of significant advancements as part of the EVR program. Phase I EVR requires more durable and leak -tight components, along with an increased collection efficiency of 98 percent. Phase 11 EVR includes three major advancements: (1) dispensing nozzles with less spillage and required compatibility with ORVR vehicles, (2) a processor to control the static pressure of the ullage, or vapor space, in the underground storage tank, and (3) an in -station diagnostic (ISD) system that provides warning alarms to alert a GDF operator of potential vapor recovery system malfunctions. Phase I EVR was fully implemented in 2005. Phase II EVR was fully implemented between 2009 and 2011. Only existing GDFs in areas that are designated attainment for the State ozone standard are exempt from Phase I and Phase 11 EVR requirements. Additionally, ARB's air toxic control measure for benzene requires retail GDFs to install Phase 9 El—E6 Pg 167 Page 593 and Phase ll systems at all GDFs except those which: (1) dispense from or transfer gasoline to a storage tank with a capacity less than 260 gallons, (2) dispense gasoline to implements of animal husbandry; or (3) only dispense to vehicles with fuel tanks less than 5 gallons capacity. The current emission inventory category for gasoline marketing and retailing consists of four subcategories that include processes associated with storage and fuel transfer operations from cargo tank trucks to GDFs and from GDFs to vehicles, fuel containers, and gasoline -powered equipment. The current emission factors have been in effect since May 1999 and do not account for advances in vapor recovery system performance achieved through implementation of ARB's EVR program; nor do they address the interaction between GDF vapor recovery systems and ORVR vehicles. This document presents updated emission factors for the four current subcategories, and two new subcategories addressing ORVR vehicle refueling and gasoline dispensing hose permeation emissions. The processes that generate emissions in the six subcategories are described below: Current subcategories: Phase 11 Fueling - Non-ORVR Vehicles: When dispensing gasoline to vehicles not equipped with ORVR, the rising liquid level in the vehicle fuel tank displaces gasoline vapors back through the fill -pipe where they are captured by a Phase 11 vapor recovery system. Vapors not captured by the Phase 11 vapor recovery system are emitted to the atmosphere. ii. Phase l Bulk Transfer Losses: During transfer of gasoline from cargo tank trucks to a GDF UST, emissions are generated when gasoline vapors in an UST are displaced to the atmosphere by the rising level of the gasoline being loaded into an UST. Emissions are controlled with a Phase I vapor recovery system. iii. Pressure Driven (Breathing) Losses: Emissions are generated when gasoline vapors are displaced to the atmosphere during the day to day operation of a given GDF. During periods when there is either no dispensing or when there is a significant slowdown in the dispensing of fuel to vehicles, such as overnight periods, gasoline in an UST evaporates into the headspace above the liquid fuel. The vapor growth caused by this evaporation increases UST static pressure and results in pressure driven emissions. Pressure driven emissions are currently controlled by a processing unit that includes either a bladder tank, membrane separator, carbon canister or thermal oxidizer. iv. Phase II Fueling - Spillage: Emissions are generated from dispensing nozzle spillage of liquid gasoline during the act of vehicle fueling, including pre - fueling, fueling and post -fueling spillage. m E1—E6 Pg168 Page 594 New subcategories: V. Phase II Fueling - ORVR Vehicles: These emissions occur at the vehicle fill - pipe during dispensing of gasoline to ORVR vehicles. ORVR systems were phased in beginning with 1998 model year passenger vehicles, and are now installed on all passenger, light-duty, and medium -duty vehicles manufactured since the 2006 model year. When an ORVR vehicle is fueled, almost all the gasoline vapor displaced from the fuel tank is routed to a carbon canister in the vehicle fuel system. At the start of dispensing, a small portion of the vapor in the vehicle fuel tank may escape through the fill -pipe before the onboard system is fully engaged. Uncontrolled fill -pipe emissions from ORVR vehicles are approximately two orders of magnitude lower than the same emissions from vehicles without ORVR, and are easily captured by Phase Il vapor recovery systems. vi. Gasoline Dispensing Hose Permeation: These emissions are caused by the migration of liquid gasoline through the outer GDF hose material and to the atmosphere through permeation. This condition primarily occurs at GDFs equipped with vacuum assist Phase 11 vapor recovery systems or no Phase ll vapor recovery system. The following sections present new or revised emission factors for the four current and two new subcategories identified above. The GDF emission factors are segregated into three tiers, each representing varying degrees of vapor recovery control equipment: uncontrolled (UEF), pre-EVR, and EVR. This document also includes attachments detailing the methodologies and identifying references used to derive the revised emission factors for each GDF subcategory. All revised emission factors are based on test data collected by ARB staff, using established ARB test procedures when applicable. III. PHASE 11 FUELING - NON-ORVR AND ORVR VEHICLES Vehicle fueling emissions occur when gasoline vapors are displaced by rising liquid in the vehicle fuel tank during gasoline dispensing. These vapors are adsorbed in a carbon canister installed on ORVR vehicles. When fueling non-ORVR vehicles, these vapors can be collected by a Phase 11 vapor recovery system and returned to a GDF storage tank. Without a Phase 11 vapor recovery system, the vapors displaced from fueling non-ORVR vehicles are uncontrolled and released to the atmosphere. The current TOG emission factors for vehicle fueling predate the conversion to EVR systems, and do not account for the introduction of ORVR vehicles to California's motor vehicle fleet. Therefore, the current vehicle refueling emission factors are representative of non-ORVR vehicles only. Current and proposed vehicle fueling emission factors are presented in Table 111-1 below. 5 E1—E6 Pg 169 Page 595 Table 111-1 Current and Revised TOG Emission Factors for Vehicle Fueling Emissions at Gasoline Dispensing Facilities Vehicle Category Current lbs/k a1 Revised Ibslk al UEF Pre-EVR UEF Pre-EVR EVR Non-ORVR Vehicles 8.4 0.74 8.4 2.4 0.42 ORVR Vehicles NIA NIA 0.42 0.12 0.021 The method used to develop the revised vehicle fueling emission factors consists of determining an UEF and then applying control efficiency (CE) factors that are representative of in -use ORVR and Phase II vapor recovery systems, resulting in controlled emission factors for each possible combination of fuel dispensing systems, ORVR vehicles, and non-ORVR vehicles. The revised UEF for non-ORVR vehicle fueling was determined from vapor recovery certification tests performed by ARB staff and independent contractors, using ARB Vapor Recovery Test Procedure TP -201.2, Efficiency and Emission Factor for Phase 11 Systems.3 In addition to vapor recovery certification testing, ARB staff has also performed tests of uncontrolled vehicle fueling at a GDF without a Phase Ii vapor recovery system, and at a GDF with a disabled Phase If vapor recovery system.The ARB test results determined the non-ORVR vehicle fueling UEF as 8.4 Ibslkgal, which agrees with and validates the current emission factor. The revised UEF for ORVR vehicles was calculated as 0.42 Ibslkgal based on the non- ORVR vehicle fueling UEF of 8.4 Ibslkgal and 95 percent control efficiency required for certification of ORVR systems. Test data from a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency study4. s suggest in -use efficiency greater than 95 percent. However, since the tests were performed on vehicles that were less than three model years old, ARB staff determined that the certification standard would represent the most conservative approach because an evaluation of the long term performance of the ORVR systems was not possible. Phase II pre-EVR in -use control efficiency is estimated at 71 percent, based on results presented in two studies by local air districts in California. The first, performed by San Diego County Air Pollution Control District (SDCAPCD) in 2000, concluded that pre- EVR balance systems experienced equipment defects at levels resulting in an estimated 70 percent collection efficiency (with complete failure about 11 percent of the time). The second, performed by South Coast Air Quality Management District, shows that in 2006, prior to the Phase ll EVR upgrade, about 92 percent of Phase Il pre-EVR systems were balance type and 8 percent were vacuum assist type.? Assuming pre- EVR vacuum assist systems experience the same 11 percent complete failure rate determined for balance systems by the SDCAPCD study, and the remaining 89 percent X El—E6 Pg 170 Page 596 operate at 95 percent collection efficiency, the calculated in -use control efficiency for Phase II pre-EVR systems is: Phase II pre-EVR CE = 0.92 * (Balance CE) + 0.08 * (0.89 Assist CE) =0.92*(0.70)+0.08*(0.89*0.95)=0.71 The revised emission factors for Phase 11 pre-EVR systems were calculated using the non-ORVR vehicle fueling UEF of 8.4 lbslkgal, 95 percent ORVR in -use control efficiency and 71 percent Phase 11 pre-EVR system in -use control efficiency as follows: ORVR, Phase II pre-EVR = (non-ORVR UEF)*(1 - ORVR CE)*(1- Ph 11 pre-EVR CE) = (8.4 lbs/legal) * (1 - 0.95) * (1 - 0.71) = 0.12 Ibslkgal Non-ORVR, Phase II pre-EVR = (non-ORVR UEF)*(1 - Ph ]1 pre-EVR CE) = (8.4 Ibslkgal) * (1 - 0.71) = 2.4 Ibslkgal Phase ll EVR in -use control efficiency for non-ORVR vehicies is estimated at 95 percent based on results from 13 separate vapor recovery system efficiency tests performed by ARB staff between January 2009 and September 2010. The 13 tests represent 221 non-ORVR vehicle fueling events, and the overall vapor recovery system in -use control efficiency determined from these tests was 95 percent. The emission factors for Phase II EVR systems were calculated using the non-ORVR vehicle fueling UEF of 8.4 Ibslkgal, 95 percent ORVR in -use control efficiency and 95 percent Phase 11 EVR system in -use control efficiency as follows: ORVR, Phase II EVR = (non-ORVR UEF)*(1 - ORVR CE)*(1 - Ph Il EVR CE) _ (8.4 Ibslkgal)*(1 - 0.95)*(1 - 0.95) = 0.021 Ibslkgal Non-ORVR, Phase 11 EVR = (non-ORVR UEF)*(1 - Ph II EVR CE) _ (8.4 Ibslkgal) * (1 - 0.95) = 0.42 Ibslkgal A more detailed description of the methodologies used to determine the revised vehicle fueling emission factors, including all applicable references is presented in Attachment 1 to this document, Revised Emission Factors for Phase It Vehicle Fueling at California Gasoline Dispensing Facilities. IV. PHASE I BULK TRANSFER LOSSES' Phase I bulk transfer losses are TOG emissions produced during the delivery of gasoline to an UST from a cargo tank, and are also referred to as working losses or transfer emissions. Transfer emissions are controlled by a Phase I vapor recovery system, which operates on the balance principle. As gasoline is transferred by gravity from a cargo tank to an UST, the rising UST liquid level displaces hydrocarbon vapors which are captured by the Phase 1 vapor recovery system and returned to the headspace area in the cargo tank. This process is again repeated when the cargo tank 7 E1—E6 Pg171 Page 597 is refilled at a gasoline bulk terminal, and the vapors displaced from the cargo tank are either recovered as liquid gasoline by and adsorption/absorption process or oxidized by a flare. The current TOG bulk transfer emission factors predate implementation of ARB's EVR program. The current and revised TOG bulk transfer emission factors are presented in Table IV -1 below. Table IV -1 Current and Revised TOG Emission Factors for Phase I Transfer Emissions at Gasoline Dispensing Facilities Current Ibslk a1 Revised Ibslk al UEF Pre-EVR UEF Pre-EVR EVR 8.4 0.42 7.7 0.38 0.15 The method used to develop the revised gasoline bulk transfer emission factors consists of determining a gasoline bulk transfer UEF, and then applying CE factors that are representative of the level of control achieved by Phase I pre-EVR and Phase I EVR systems. The revised bulk transfer UEF was derived from UST headspace TOG concentration data obtained from five tests performed by ARB staff at a Sacramento, California GDF between February 2012 and September 2013. In determining the revised .UEF, ARB staff assumes the average UST headspace TOG concentration measured in these tests is representative of the average TOG concentration of the vapor mass displaced from an UST during bulk gasoline transfer if the emissions were uncontrolled. Based on these test results, ARB staff determined the revised bulk transfer UEF as 7.7 lbslkgal, which represents an 8 percent decrease from the current value of 8.4 lbs/legal. Phase I pre-EVR in -use control efficiency is estimated at 95 percent, based on the performance standard for Phase I pre-EVR equipment certification and results from ten Phase l volumetric efficiency tests performed by ARB staff at gasoline bulk plant distribution facilities (bulk plant) prior to implementation of Phase I EVR. Results for each of the ten tests determined >95 percent volumetric efficiency during bulk transfer of gasoline from a cargo tank to the bulk plant UST. The revised emission factor for Phase l pre-EVR systems was calculated using th-e bulk transfer UEF of 7.7 lbslkgal and 95 percent Phase I pre-EVR in -use control efficiency as follows: Phase I pre-EVR = (bulk transfer UEF) * (1 - Phase 1 pre-EVR CE) _ (7.7 lbslkgal) * (1 - 0.95) = 0.38 lbslkgal Phase I EVR in -use control efficiency is estimated at 98 percent, based on the performance standard for Phase I EVR equipment certification and results from ten Phase I volumetric efficiency tests performed by ARB staff at bulk plants after F1 --E6 Pg 172 Page 598 implementation of Phase I EVR. Results for each of the ten tests determined >98 percent volumetric efficiency during bulk transfer of gasoline from a cargo tank to the bulk plant UST. The emission factor for Phase I EVR systems was calculated using the bulk transfer UEF of 7.7 lbs/kgal and 98 percent Phase I-EVR in -use control efficiency as follows: Phase I EVR = (bulk transfer UEF) * (1 - Phase I EVR CE) (7.7 Ibslkgal) * (1 - 0.98) = 0.15 Ibslkgal A more detailed description of the methodologies used to determine the revised Phase I transfer emission factors, including all applicable references, is presented in Attachment 2 to this document, Revised Emission Factors for Phase l Gasoline Bulk Transfer at California Gasoline Dispensing Facilities V. PRESSURE DRIVEN LOSSES Pressure driven, or breathing, losses are fugitive emissions from UST vent riser and/or Phase II vapor recovery components resulting from the day to day operations at a given GDF. These emissions are influenced by several variables, most notably: gasoline Reid vapor pressure (RVP) and evaporation rate, ORVR vehicle throughput, overnight facility shutdown or extended facility inactivity, gasoline delivery schedule, vapor recovery system operating principle and vapor recovery system pressure integrity. These variables can act singularly or in combination to elevate static pressure in UST headspace, resulting in pressure driven emissions. Current and revised pressure driven emission factors are presented in Table V-1 below. Current pressure driven emission factors for GD Fs without Phase II vapor recovery (UEF) and with Phase II pre-EVR vapor recovery systems are 0.84 lbs/legal and 0.10 Ibslkgal, respectively. There is no current emission factor applicable to GDFs equipped with Phase I I EVR systems. Table V-1 Current and Revised TOG Pressure Driven Emission Factors for Gasoline Dispensing Facilities Current Ibslkgal Revised Ibslkgal UEF Pre-EVR UEF 4-0.10 Pre-EVR EVR 0.84 0.76 0.092 0.024 The revised UEF of 0.76 lbs/kgal was calculated from UST static pressure data collected at a fleet rental car GDF located in San Jose, California. This facility is exempt from Phase II vapor recovery requirements by Bay Area Air Quality Management District.$ UST static pressure data collected at this facility during two 30 - day periods were combined with fugitive flow rate equations in ARB Vapor Recovery Test ProcedureTP-201.2F, Pressure Related Fugitive Emissions,9 a TOG concentration of 46 percent as propane, and the facility gasoline throughput of 12,000 gallons per �] 1=1--E6 Pg173 Page 599 month to yield the revised UEF for pressure driven emissions from GDFs without Phase II systems. The 46 percent TOG concentration value used in UEF calculation is based on the average UST headspace TOG concentration measured during ten tests performed by ARB staff at three GDFs between February 2012 and September 2013. TOG concentrations were determined using non -dispersive infrared gas analyzers and sampling and quality assurance procedures referenced in ARB Vapor Recovery Test Procedure TP -201.2, Efficiency and Emission Factor for Phase It Systems. The revised pressure driven emission factors for GDFs with Phase 11 pre-EVR and Phase 11 EVR systems were estimated as 0.092 lbslkgal and 0.024 fbs/kgal, respectively. The revised emission factors were derived from data collected between November 2009 and October 2010 at six GDFs located in Northern California. These sites were randomly selected as part of an ARB program to examine the dynamics causing substantial increases in the number of ISD over -pressure alarms corresponding to the transition from summer formulated fuel with Reid vapor pressure (RVP) restricted to less than or equal to 7 pounds per square inch, to winter formulated fuel with no RVP restriction. The six sites represent a cross section of the characteristics associated with California GDFs, such as throughput category, vapor recovery system operating principle and 24-hour operation versus overnight closure. The reductions in revised pressure driven emission factors are primarily attributable to advancements in Phase li vapor recovery system technologies exclusive to EVR systems, such as: the Franklin -Healy vapor recovery nozzle which detects ORVR vehicles and reduces its ViL ratio, pressure management processors designed to maintain UST static pressure below defined levels, and ISD systems that monitor vapor recovery system operating parameters and alert GDF operators of vapor recovery equipment failures. A more detailed description of the methodologies used to determine revised pressure driven emission factors, including all applicable references, is presented in Attachment 3, Revised Emission Factors for Pressure Driven Emissions of California Gasoline Dispensing Facilities, VI. PHASE II FUELING - SPILLAGE Gasoline spillage emissions are generated from liquid gasoline spills associated with vehicle fueling, including pre -fueling, fueling, and post -fueling spillage. The current and revised emission factors for gasoline spillage during vehicle fueling are presented in Table VI -1 below. 10 E1—E6 Pg174 Page 600 Table VI -I Current and Revised TOG Emission Factors for Gasoline Spillage at Gasoline Dispensing Facilities Current lbslkaal Revised Ibslk al UEF Pre-EVR UEF Pre-EVR EVR 0.64 0,42 0.61 0.42 0.24 Current emission factors for gasoline spillage at GDFs without Phase 11 vapor recovery (UEF) and with Phase 11 pre-EVR systems are 0.64 Ibslkgal and 0.42 Ibslkgal, respectively, based on data from tests performed by ARB, (Morgester et al., 1992).1° There is no current emission factor applicable to GDFs equipped with Phase 11 EVR systems. ARB staff has reviewed the test data used to calculate the current gasoline spillage UEF and pre-EVR emission factor. Based on this review, ARB staff determined the revised gasoline spillage UEF is 0.61 lbs/kgai, and the revised gasoline spillage pre-EVR emission factor should remain at 0.42 lbslkgal. The revised emission factors are essentially unchanged from the current values because there have been no technical advancements for the respective nozzles since the current factors were established. The gasoline spillage emission factor for GDFs with Phase I I EVR is 0.24 Ibslkgal, which is the current performance standard referenced in ARB Certification Procedure CP -201, Certification Procedure for Vapor Recovery Systems at Gasoline Dispensing Facilities." A more detailed description of the methodologies used to determine the revised gasoline spillage emission factors, including all applicable references, is presented in Attachment 4, Revised Emission Factors for Gasoline Spillage at California Gasoline Dispensing Facilities. VII. GASOLINE DISPENSING HOSE PERMEATION ARB adopted performance standards for gasoline dispensing hose permeation on July 26, 2012. Prior to adoption of these standards there were no hose permeation performance standards for California GDFs. Facilities subject to the standards will have four years from their effective date to comply. The effective date is defined as the date on which the first dispensing hose is certified by ARB to meet the new hose permeation performance standards. Hose permeation performance standards only apply to hoses in which liquid fuel comes into contact with the outer hose wall, specifically: Phase 11 vacuum assist and conventional (non -vapor recovery) hoses. Vacuum assist hoses account for approximately 70 percent of the almost 100,000 Phase II vapor recovery hoses installed at California GDFs.12 There are approximately 1,000 additional hoses installed at facilities without Phase II vapor recovery. The performance standards do not apply to 11 E1 --E6 Pg175 Page 601 hoses of balance Phase 11 vapor recovery systems, which dispense gasoline through the center region of a coaxial hose and transport vapor in the outer region. Figure VII -I illustrates the differences in fuel delivery and vapor return pathways for vacuum assist and balance vapor recovery hoses. Figure VII -I, Cutaways of Vapor Recovery GDF Hose Assemblies Showing Vapor and Liquid Paths Vapor Patti Liquid Pati "apor Balance Hose Permeation rates are influenced by several factors, the most significant of which are.. fuel temperature, gasoline formulation, and concentration gradient across the barrier material. As is the case with vehicle refueling emissions, gasoline throughput to ORVR vehicles plays a role in the permeation rates of balance type hoses, because refueling of ORVR vehicles affects the concentration gradient across the outer wall of these hoses. Therefore, balance hose permeation emissions are expected to decline in future years as gasoline throughput to ORVR vehicles increases. When considering an isolated GDF hose, the permeation rate of liquid gasoline through vacuum assist and conventional hoses is relatively unaffected by activity level (i.e., the volume of gasoline dispensed or throughput). These hoses should permeate at the same daily rate as long as there is some level of activity. Therefore, the hose permeation emissions in tons per day can be estimated directly, independent of activity level. However, because other GDF emissions calculations are activity based, hose permeation emission factors were estimated as a function of activity level in order to maintain dimensional consistency with the emission factors proposed for the five other GDF subcategories. 12 E1—E6 Pg176 Page 602 Hose permeation emission factors based on GDF activity and ORVR penetration for years 2013 and 2017 are presented in Table VII -1 below. Table V11-1 Year 2013 and 2017 Hose Permeation TOG Emission Factors for Gasoline Dispensing Facilities Year 2013 Ibslk al) Year 2017 lbslk al UEF Pre-EVR EVR UEF Pre-EVR I EVR 0.062 0.062 0.062 0.009 ± 0.009 1 0.009 The 2013 emission factors represent the uncontrolled permeation rates determined from ARB laboratory tests on vacuum assist, conventional and balance hoses. 13.14 The 2017 controlled emission factors (CEF) assume full implementation of the 3.23 grams per meter squared per day (referenced to 71 °F) vacuum assist/conventional hose permeation standard at California GDFs. This factor reflects the predicted population of vacuum assist, conventional and balance hoses and their associated permeation rates using the following equation: GDF Hose CEF2017 = CEFvacicon. 2017 + UEFeal, 2017 0.002lbslkgal + 0.007 lbslkgal = 0.009lbslkgal The 2017 hose permeation CEF of 0.009 Ibslkgal represents an 88% reduction in hose permeation emissions compared to the 2013 emissions baseline of 0.062 Ibslkgal. ARB's cost analysis suggests cost savings15 associated with low permeation hose conversion in both vapor recovery and non -vapor recovery applications. A more detailed description of the methodologies used to determine the proposed GDF hose permeation emission factors, including all applicable references and intermediate variables such as: permeation rates, hose surface areas, hose populations and gasoline throughput is presented in Attachment 5, Proposed Emission Factors for Gasoline Dispensing Hose Permeation of California Gasoline Dispensing Facilities. VIII. CONCLUSIONS The revised GDF emission factors show no change to the current UEF for Phas6 11 non- ORVR vehicle refueling of 8.4 lbs/kgal; and a 17 percent percent reduction to the current UEF for Phase I transfer losses from 8.4 Ibslkgal to 7.0 Ibslkgal. The revised emission factor for refueling non-ORVR vehicles with Phase 11 pre-EVR systems of 2.4 Ibslkgal is approximately 3 times its current value of 0.74 Ibslkgal, due to the lower in - use efficiency assigned to Phase 11 pre-EVR systems. However, Phase 11 pre-EVR systems only account for approximately 3 percent of gasoline dispensed at California GDFs. 13 El --E6 Pg 177 Page 603 The revised emission factors also include categories for GDFs with EVR equipment, which currently dispense approximately 95 percent of gasoline sold in California. There are no current emission factors for EVR categories, as the current emission factors predate EVR systems. The revised emission factors proposed for EVR categories are all significantly lower than the current pre-EVR values; and are reflective of both advancements in vapor recovery system performance achieved through ARB's EVR program and the increasing statewide gasoline throughput to ORVR vehicles. 14 ET—E6 Pg178 Page 604 IX. REFERENCES 1. Preliminary Analysis of U.S. EPA's Draft Regulation on Onboard Refueling Vapor Recovery (ORVR) Widespread Use Determination and California's Enhanced Vapor Recovery (EVR) Requirements. J. Marconi, September 8, 2011. 2. California Air Resources Board Presentation: Enhanced Vapor Recovery Implementation Update, June 28, 2008. Ntp://www.arb.ca.gov/vapor/arc[iive/2008/evrtalkO62608.pd . 3. ARB Stationary Source Test Procedures, Volume II, Vapor Recovery Test Procedure TP -201.2. htt ://www.arb.ca. ov/testmeth/volt/t -201 2. df 4. SHED test data for 337 2004-2005 model vehicles is available from David Good, U.S. EPA Office of Air and Radiation, Office of Transportation and Air Quality, Compliance Information Systems. 5. NESCAUM Report - Onboard Refueling Vapor Recovery Systems Analysis of Widespread Use, pages 9-10, Skelton and Rector, 8120/2007. 6. Barnard R. McEntire, Performance of Balance Vapor Recovery Systems at Gasoline Dispensing Facilities, San Diego Air Pollution Control District, May 18, 2000. 7. Data on 2006 Balance/Assist Split for Pre-EVR systems provided to Frances Cameron by South Coast Air Quality Management District Staff. 8. Bay Area Air Quality Management District Regulation 8, Rule 7, paragraph 112.9. htt ://www.baa md. ov/-/media/Files/Plannin %20and%20Research/Rules°/a20a nd%20Reg sfreg°/x2008/ra0807.ashx?la=en. 9. ARB Vapor Recovery Test ProcedureTP-201.2F, Pressure Related Fugitive Emissions. htt ://www.arb.ca. ovftestmetti/volt/t 201.2f Oct2003. df. 10. James J. Morgester, Robert L. Fricker, G. Henry Jordan (1992) Comparison of Spill Frequencies and Amounts at Vapor Recovery and Conventional Service Stations in California, Journal of Air & Waste Management Association, Vol 42, No. 3, pp284-289, March 1992, 11. ARB Certification Procedure CP -201, Certification Procedure for Vapor Recovery Systems at Gasoline Dispensing Facilities. http://www.arb.ca.gov/testrneth/vol2/cp201 april2013.pdf 12. ARB, Initial Statement of Reasons August 3, 2011, Appendix 4, Gasoline Dispensing Facility hose Emissions Inventory for Vacuum Assist and conventional Hoses. http://www.arb.ca.gov/vapor/rulem aking.htm. 15 E 1-E6 Pg 179 Page 605 13. ARB, Gasoline Dispensing Facility (GDF) Vacuum -Assist and Conventional Hose Permeation Study, July 19, 2010, Jason McPhee, P.E, 14. ARB, Gasoline Dispensing Facility (GDF) Balance Hose Permeation Study, June 19, 2008, revised October 6. 2010, Jason McPhee. 15, Cost Effectiveness Report: 2011 Amendments to the Regulation for Certification of Vapor Recovery Systems at Gasoline Dispensing Facilities, Jason McPhee, P.E. littp://www.arb.ca.gov/vapor/rulernakitig.titni. 16 El—E6 Pg 180 Page 606 Attachments Attachment 1: Revised Emission Factors for Phase II Vehicle Fueling at California Gasoline Dispensing Facilities Attachment 2: Revised Emission Factors for Phase I Gasoline Bulk Transfer at California Gasoline Dispensing Facilities Attachment 3: Revised Emission Factors for Pressure Driven Emissions at California Gasoline Dispensing Facilities Attachment 4: Revised Emission Factors for Gasoline Spillage at California Gasoline Dispensing Facilities Attachment 5: Proposed Emission Factors for Gasoline Dispensing Hose Permeation at California Gasoline Dispensing Facilities E1—E6 Pg 181 Page 607 8477 Archibald Gas Station/Car !Nosh Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Study Response to Comments —Memo#1 JN:02681804 Memo#1 Appendix C Site Plan and Google Earth Overlay E1 --E6 Pg182 Page 608 m 8477Archibuld Gos Station/Car Wash Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Study City of Rancho Cucamonga, CA fSCAQl4RD Response to Comments i,l Page 609 8477 Archibald Gas Station/Car Wash Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Study City of Rancho Cucamonqn, CA K Distance of pumps ~a to nearest sensitive building Facade = M 240ft M{,.`... LO00 �. y 3 y r •i'!f3iS _srlja Ste' SCAg11l.?D Response to Comment; i .t !w Distance of storage tanks to nearest sensitive building- ;' facade P/L = 275ft Page 610 8477 Archibald Gas Station/Car Wash Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Study Response to Comments — Memo##1 JN:02681804 Memo#1' Appendix D Screening Tables for Gasoline Dispensing Facilities CARB 2005 Air Quality and Land Use Handbook Table 1-1 E1 --E6 Pg185 Page 611 SCAQMD PERMIT APPLICATION PACKAGE "N" Tables Effective for Applications Deemed Complete On or After October 1, 2017 Table 12.1A - Screening Tables for Gasoline Dispensing Facilities Underground Storage Tank (UST) Residential N11CR per One Million Gallons of Gasoline SCAQMD 9() Version 8.1 E1 -E6 Pg186 Page 612 Downwind Distance (mcters) Station Abbr. Location 25 50 75 100 200 300 500 1000 A.71:1S Azusa 2.884 1.040 0.550 0.340 0.093 0.045 0.018 0.006 SNAP Banning 4.208 1.703 0,940 0.603 0.186 0.093 0.039 0.013 CELA C'entraI L.A. 2.454 0.876 0.455 0.287 0.085 0.041 0.017 0.005 ELS] Lake Elsinore 2.978 1.075 0.558 0.347 0.103 0,051 0.021 0.007 FONT Fontana 3.306 1,254 0.677 0.423 0.124 0.060 0.025 0.007 IISN'J Mission Viejo 2,721 0.981 0.51 S 0.319 0.094 0.047 0.018 0.006 PERI Perris 3.494 1.310 0.695 0.43E 0.127 0.063 0.026 0.008 PICO Pico Rivera 2.629 0,956 0.509 0,316 0.091 0.044 0.018 0.005 RDLD Redlands 3.562 1.325 0.691 0.418 0.143 0.055 0.024 0.007 UPLA Upland 3,108 1.133 0.609 0.384 0.111 0.054 0,022 0.007 KBIJR Burbank Airport 3.097 1.198 0.655 0.410 0.125 0.052 0.026 0.008 KCVO Chino Airport. 4.084 1.609 0.870 0.549 0.166 0.082 0.033 0.010 KCQT USCIDuvvntown L.A. 3.382 1.244 0.656 0.407 0.110 0.052. 0.021 0,007 KFUL Fullerton Airport 2.726 1.027 0.553 0.348 0.104 0.052 0.021 0.007 K11 1111 Hawthorne Airport 3.225 1.197 0.640 0.405 0.123 0.061 0.025 0.007 KLAX Los Angeles Inti Airport 4.456 1.830 1.010 0.648 0.204 0.102 0.044 0.013 KLCB Long Beach Airport 3.417 1.394 0.764 0.488 0.151 0.076 0.033 0.010 KONT Ontario Airport 4,934 2.006 1.111 0.710 0.222 0.112 0.047 0.015 KPSP Palm Springs Airport 3.363 1.352 0.736 0.467 0.144 0.073 0.031 0.010 KRAL Riverside Airport 4.141 1.678 0.922 0.588 0.177 0.088 0.038 0.013 KSMO Santa A[onica Airport 3.444 1.336 0.731 0.462 0.139 0.068 0.028 0.008 KSNA John Wayne Intl Airport 4.041 1.605 0.870 0.549 0.164 0.079 0.032 0.010 KTRM Desert Hot Springs Airport 3.820 1.553 0.348 0.540 0.163 0.052 0.035 0.010 KVNY Van Nuys Airport 2.909 1.132 0.608 0.378 0.111 0.055 0.022 0.007 SCAQMD 9() Version 8.1 E1 -E6 Pg186 Page 612 SCAQMD PERMIT APPLICATION PACKAGE "N" Tables Effective for Applications Deemed Complete On or After October I , 2017. Table 12.2A - Screening Tables for Gasoline Dispensing Facilities Aboveground Storage Tank (AST) Residential MICR per One Billion Gallons of Gasoline SCAQMD Version 8.1 E1 -E6 Pg187 Page 613 Downwind Distance (meters) Station Abhr. Location 25 50 75 100 200 300 500 1000 AZUS Azusa 4.447 1.603 0.827 0.496 0.114 0.050 0.030 0.006 BNAI' Banning 5.469 2.176 1.185 0.748 0.210 0.101 0.042 0.013 CELA Central L.A. 3.610 1.258 0.641 0.393 0.100 0.046 0.019 0.006 ELS1 Lake Elsinore 4.056 1.458 0.748 0.452 0.119 0.057 0.024 0.008 FONT Fontana 4.812 1.787 0.940 0.569 0.145 0.067 0.027 0.008 .IIS%'J \fission Vje,lo 3.600 1.276 0.650 0.395 0.108 O.U52 0.021 0,007 PERI Perris 4.639 1,733 0.904 0.558 0.144 0.069 0.029 6.009 PICC Pico Rivera 3.720 1.342 0.699 0.421 0.106 0.049 0.019 0.006 RDLD Redlands - 5.809 2.218 1.154 0.685 0.132 0.062 0.026 0.008 UPLA Upland 4.693 1.677 0.871 0.532 0.130 0.060 0.025 0.008 KBUR Burbank Airport 3.040 1.493 0.808 0.493 0.139 0.069 0.028 0.008 KCNO Chino Airport. 4.971 1.950 1.047 0.658 0.188 0.091 0.037 0.011 KCQT USC/Downtown L.A. 5.393 1.959 1.002 0.604 0.133 0.054 0.024 0.007 KFUL Fullerton Airport 3.6144 1.336 0.699 0.429 0.118 0.058 0.024 0.007 KHHR Hawthorne Airport 4.415 1.593 0.837 0.511 0.140 0.067 0.027 0.008 KLAX Los Angeles Int'l Airport 5.6244 2.316 1.257 0.794 0.227 0.111 0.047 0.015 KLGB long Beach Airport 4.450 1.829 0.993 0.621 0.172 0.083 0.035 0.011 KOUT Ontario Airport 5.990 2.49.4 1.370 0.862 0.249 0.121 0.051 0.017 KPSP Palm Springs Airport 4.148 1.691 0.915 0.573 0.163 0.080 0.034 0.010 KRAL Riverside Airport 5.770 2.319 1.244 0.776 0.202 0.096 0.041 0.013 KS.NiO Santa INIonica Airport 4.771 1.829 0.977 0.596 0.159 0.074 0.031 0.009 KSNA John Wayne Int'l Airport 5.072 2.017 1.085 0.674 0.196 0.088 0.036 0.010 KTRDS Desert Hot Springs Airport 4.681 1.917 1.040 0.660 0,183 0.091 0.039 0.012 KN'NY N'an nuvs Airport 3.673 1.428 0.760 0.467 0.127 0.060 0.025 0.008 SCAQMD Version 8.1 E1 -E6 Pg187 Page 613 Table 1-1 Recommendations on Siting New Sensitive Land Uses Such As Residences, Schools, Daycare Centers, Playgrounds, or Medical Facilities* Source Category Advisory Recommendations Freeways and Avoid siting new sensitive land uses within 500 feet of a freeway, High -Traffic urban roads with 100,000 vehicles/day, or rural roads with 50,000 Roads vehicles/day. • Avoid siting new sensitive land uses within 1,000 feet of a distribution center (that accommodates more than 100 trucks per day, more than 40 trucks with operating transport refrigeration Distribution units (TRUs) per day, or where TRU unit operations exceed 300 Centers hours per ween). • Take into account the configuration of existing distribution centers and avoid locating residences and other new sensitive land uses near entry and exit points. • Avoid siting new sensitive land uses within 1,000 feet of a major Rail Yards service and maintenance rail yard. Within one mile of a rail yard, consider possible siting limitations and mitigation approaches. • Avoid siting of new sensitive land uses immediately downwind of Ports ports in the most heavily impacted zones. Consult local air districts or the ARB on the status of pending analyses of health risks. • Avoid siting new sensitive land uses immediately downwind of Refineries petroleum refineries. Consult with local air districts and other local agencies to determine an appropriate se aration. Chrome Platers Avoid siting new sensitive land uses within 1,000 feet of a chrome later. • Avoid siting new sensitive land uses within 300 feet of any dry Dry Cleaners cleaning operation. For operations with two or more machines, Using provide 500 feet. For operations with 3 or more machines, consult Perchloro- with the local air district. ethylene Do not site new sensitive land uses in the same building with perc dry cleaning operations. Gasoline Avoid siting new sensitive land uses within 300 feet of a large gas Dispensing station (defined as a facility with a throughput of 3.6 million gallons Facilities per year or greater). A 50 foot separation is recommended for typical gas dispensing facilities, *Notes: • These recommendations are advisory. Land use agencies have to balance other considerations, including housing and transportation needs, economic development priorities, and other quality of life issues. Page 4 E1—E6 Pg 188 Page 614 • Recommendations are based primarily on data showing that the air pollution exposures addressed here (i.e., localized) can be reduced as much as 84% with the recommended separation. • The relative risk for these categories varies greatly (see Table 1-2). To determine the actual risk near a particular facility, a site-specific analysis would be required. Risk from diesel PM will decrease over time as cleaner technology phases in. • These recommendations are designed to fill a gap where information about existing facilities may not be readily available and are not designed to substitute for more specific information if it exists. The recommended distances take into account other factors in addition to available health risk data (see individual category descriptions). • Site-specific project design improvements may help reduce air pollution exposures and should also be considered when siting new sensitive land uses. • This table does not imply that mixed residential and commercial development in general is incompatible. Rather it focuses on known problems like dry cleaners using perchloroethylene that can be addressed with reasonable preventative actions. • A summary of the basis for the distance recommendations can be found in Table 1-2. Page 5 E1—E6 Pg 189 Page 615 RESOLUTION NO. 18-37 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN MAP AMENDMENT NO. DRC2015-00683, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION FROM LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL TO GENERAL COMMERCIAL FOR A 1.22 -ACRE SITE LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND ARROW ROUTE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF — APNS: 0208-291-05 AND 0208-291-06. A. Recitals. 1. Archibald Oil filed an application for General Plan Amendment No. DRC2014-00683 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On June 13, 2018, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and continued the application to the June 27, 2018 Planning Commission meeting. 3. On June 27, 2018, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and continued the application to the July 11, 2018 Planning Commission meeting. 4. On July 11, 2018, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 5. Ail legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are'true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing on July 11, 2018, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to two parcels consisting of approximately 1.22 -acre of land, basically a rectangular configuration, located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route and the westerly parcel is presently improved with an inoperative service station and the easterly parcel is vacant. Said property is currently designated as Low Medium Residential; and F1 --E6 Pg190 Page 616 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-37 GPA DRC2015-00683 — ARCHIBALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 2 b. The property to the north of the subject site is designated Low Medium Residential and is improved with the Mulberry Early Education Center. To the west is Archibald Avenue and beyond that the property is designated Office and is vacant. The property to the east is designated Low Medium Residential and contains a single-family house. To the south is Arrow Route and beyond that the property is designated General Commercial and is improved with a commercial center; and C. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and d. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and This amendment is consistent with the adopted general plan, including the housing element; and g. The remaining sites identified in the housing element are adequate to meet the requirements of California Government Code Section 65583.2 and to accommodate the City's share of the regional housing need pursuant to Section 65584. The City's regional housing need includes a requirement for 209 Very Low Income housing units, 141 Low -Income housing units, 158 Moderate -Income housing units, and 340 Above Moderate Income housing units for a total of 848 housing units. The City has a total remaining regional housing need, by income level, of 191 Very Low, 130 Low, and 127 Moderate -Income units, for a total of 448 units. The 2013 Housing Element identifies adequate sites to accommodate an additional 844 housing units in the capacity analysis. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows. a. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area as the project site is currently developed as a service station land use, although it has been inactive since 2002. The project site is suitable for a service station land use, provides appropriate site access, has all utility services available, and can be conditioned to meet all related performance criteria and development standards for a service station and carwash facility. The vacant easterly parcel provides sufficient area for the development of a commercial land use consistent with all applicable development standards; and b. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties; the project site has been previously disturbed (development of the service station use) and by the 'surrounding residential, commercial, industrial, and educational development, and the project has been designed to appropriately address all applicable development standards; and P1 --P6 Pg 191 Page 617 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-37 GPA DRC2015-00683 — ARCHIBALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 3 C. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan as the proposed General Plan Amendment is consistent with General Plan policies LU -1.2 and LU -2.4. Policy LU -1.2 states "Designate appropriate land uses to serve the local needs and be able to respond to regional market needs, as appropriate." The reestablishment of the existing service station and development of the carwash land use will serve the local population's fuel and carwash needs, and will support the surrounding community's needs as both Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route are identified as Major Arterials (General Plan Figure CM -2) with a significant daily traffic volume. Policy LU -2.4 states "Promote complementary infill development, rehabilitation, and re- use that contribute positively to the surrounding residential neighborhood areas." The rehabilitation and reuse of this service station facility and the eventual infill development of the vacant easterly parcel will contribute positively to the surrounding residential area by permitting significant site plan and aesthetic improvements to an underutilized project site. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends the City Council adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration; and b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission therefore recommends the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration; and C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore recommends the City Council adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project; and d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the City Council's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the E1—E6 Pg192 Page 618 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-37 GPA DRC2015-00683 — ARCHIBALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 4 City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of General Plan Amendment No. DRC2015- 00683, as depicted in Attachment A, attached hereto. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF JULY 2018. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ATTEST: Francisco Oaxaca, Chairman Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burgett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of July 2018, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: El -E6 Pg 193 Page 619 General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 — Archibald Oil Existing: Low Medium Residential Proposed: General Commercial M ATTACHMENT A FI—E6 Pg194 Page 620 RESOLUTION NO. 18-38 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN ORDINANCE APPROVING ZONING MAP AMENDMENT NO. DRC2015-00684, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE ZONING MAP LAND USE DISTRICT FROM THE LOW MEDIUM (LM) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT TO THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL (GC) DISTRICT FOR A 1.22 ACRE SITE LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND ARROW ROUTE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF — APNS: 0208-291-05 AND 0208-291-06. A. Recitals. 1. Archibald Oil filed an application for Zoning Map Amendment No. DRC2015-00684, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development District Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On June 13, 2018, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and continued the application to the June 27, 2018 Planning Commission meeting. 3. On June 27, 2018, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and continued the application to the July 11, 2018 Planning Commission meeting 4. On July 11, 2018, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application DRC2015-00684 and issued Resolution No. 18-37 recommending to the City Council that the associated General Plan Amendment No. DRC2015-00683 be approved. 5. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing on July 11, 2018, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to two parcels consisting of approximately 1.22 acres of land, basically a rectangular configuration, located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route and the westerly parcel is presently improved with an inoperative service station and the easterly parcel is vacant. Said property is currently designated as Low Medium Residential; and E1 -E6 Pg 195 Page 621 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-38 ZMA DRC2015-00684 —ARCHIBALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 2 b. The property to the north of the subject site is designated Low Medium Residential and is improved with the Mulberry Early Education Center. To the west is Archibald Avenue and beyond that the property is designated Office and is vacant. The property to the east is designated Low Medium Residential and contains a single-family house. To the south is Arrow Route and beyond that the property is designated General Commercial and is improved with a commercial center; and C. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and d. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area the project site is currently developed as a service station land use, although it has been inactive since 2002. The project site is suitable for a service station land use, provides appropriate site access, has all utility services available, and can be conditioned to meet all related performance criteria and development standards for a service station and carwash facility. The vacant easterly parcel provides sufficient area for the development of a commercial land use consistent with all applicable development standards; and b. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties; the project site has been previously disturbed (development of the service station use) and by the surrounding residential, commercial, industrial, and educational development, and the project has been designed to appropriately address all applicable development standards; and C. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan as the proposed General Plan Amendment is consistent with General Plan policies LU -1.2 and LU -2.4. Policy LU -1.2 states "Designate appropriate land uses to serve the local needs and be able to respond to regional market needs, as appropriate." The reestablishment of the existing service station and development of the carwash land use will serve the local population's fuel and carwash needs, and will support the surrounding community's needs as both Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route are identified as Major Arterials (General Plan Figure CM -2) with a significant daily traffic volume. Policy LU -2.4 states "Promote complementary infill development, rehabilitation, and re- use that contribute positively to the surrounding residential neighborhood areas." The rehabilitation and reuse of this service station facility and the eventual infill development of the vacant easterly parcel will contribute positively to the surrounding residential area by permitting significant site plan and aesthetic improvements to an underutilized project site. El—E6 Pg 196 Page 622 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-38 ZMA DRC2015-00684 — ARCHIBALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 3 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment recommends the City Council adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined'that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration; and b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission therefore recommends the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration; and C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore recommends the City Council adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project; and d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the City Council's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 4772750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of Zoning Map Amendment No. DRC2015-00684, as depicted in Attachment A, attached hereto. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF JULY 2018. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA E1—E6 Pg 197 Page 623 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-38 ZMA DRC2015-00684 -- ARCHIBALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 4 ATTEST: Francisco Oaxaca, Chairman Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of July 2018, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: E 1—E6 Pg 198 Page 624 � •�••� •� �� ■ • ■1111■111111 1111 111 �� �� ��I■■■11 ����� �■��■■■■. ATTACHMENT A El—E6 Pg 199 Page 625 RESOLUTION NO. 18-39 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW NO. DRC2015-00682, A REQUEST TO ESTABLISH RETAIL SALES IN AN EXISTING 1,728 SQUARE FOOT VACANT SERVICE STATION BUILDING, RE-ESTABLISH AN EXISTING 1,481 SQUARE FOOT CANOPY WITH 4 FUEL PUMPS, AND INSTALL A 968 SQUARE FOOT CAR WASH ON A 29,456 SQUARE FOOT (0.676 ACRE) PARCEL IN THE LOW MEDIUM (LM) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (PROPOSED GENERAL COMMERCIAL (GC) DISTRICT) AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND ARROW ROUTE, LOCATED AT 8477 ARCHIBALD AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -- APN: 0208-291-05. A. Recitals. 1. Archibald Oil filed an application for the approval of Development Review No. DRC2015-00682, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On June 13, 2018, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and continued the application to the June 27, 2018 Planning Commission meeting. 3. On June 27, 2018, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and continued the application to the July 11, 2018 Planning Commission meeting 4. On July 11, - 2018, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting or duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said meeting on that date. 5. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced meeting on July 11, 2018, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route with a street frontage of approximately 170 feet along Archibald Avenue and a street frontage of approximately 175 feet along Arrow Route and is presently improved with a vacant service station building and a fuel canopy with 4 fuel pumps; and E1 --E6 Pg200 Page 626 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-39 DR DRC2015-00682 —ARCHIBALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 2 b. The property to the north of the subject site is designated Low Medium Residential and is improved with the Mulberry Early Education Center. To the west is Archibald Avenue and beyond that the property is designated Office and is vacant. The property to the east is designated Low Medium Residential and contains a single-family house. To the south is Arrow Route and beyond that the property is designated General Commercial and is improved with a commercial center; and G. The application proposes to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re-establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 -square foot car wash on a 29,466 -square foot (0.676 acre) parcel; and d. The project site is located in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (a proposed General Commercial (GC) District and has been designed to comply with the all applicable design standards, except for the number of parking spaces and the minimum parking setback, which are addressed in the corresponding Variance and Minor Exception applications; and e. The Development Code Chapter 17.90.030 regulates Drive -In and Drive - Through Use and specifically identifies that uses with drive-through facilities shall be located 300 feet away from any intersection. However, per the Code "deviations to these provisions may be considered through the issuance of a site plan and Architectural [Design] Review Permit;" and f. The proposed site plan and building elevations were submitted as part of the plans associated with the proposed project. The proposed carwash is attached to, and integrated into, the design of the existing gas station building. It functions on the project site as an accessory use to the gas station. It is also screened as much as possible as seen from the intersection. Furthermore, the plotting of the carwash allows for full vehicular circulation and emergency access around the site; and g. Due to these design characteristics, the Design Review Committee's recommendation of approval, and the Planning Commission's consideration of this proposal, which if approved, the 300 -foot setback is not necessary; and h. Eight parking spaces are required for this project; however, due to site constraints, the project site provides 7 parking spaces. The applicant has submitted a request for Minor Exception DRC2017-00879 to allow for a reduction in the required parking by one stall (or 12.5 percent); and i. The project will retain the existing driveway at the northwest corner of the site, close the existing driveway at the southwest corner of the site, and relocate the existing driveway at the southeast corner of the site to a new shared driveway for the project site and the vacant property to the east; both driveways will be provided with decorative paving. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan. The proposed project is consistent with General Plan policies LU -1.2 and LU -2.4. The reestablishment of the existing service station and development of the carwash land use will serve the local E1—E6 Pg201 Page 627 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-39 %DR DRC2015-00682 -- ARCHIBALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 3 population's fuel and carwash needs, and will support the surrounding community's needs as both Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route are identified as Major Arterials with a significant daily traffic volume. The rehabilitation and reuse of this service station facility and the eventual infill development of the vacant easterly parcel will contribute positively to the surrounding residential area by permitting significant site plan and aesthetic improvements to an underutilized project site; and b. The proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district (General Commercial (GC) District) in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area as the project site is currently developed as a service station land use, although it has been inactive since 2002. The vacant easterly parcel provides sufficient area for the development of a commercial land use consistent with all applicable development standards; and C. The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. The proposed project will meet all applicable requirements of the Development Code except parking and parking setback. The applicant has submitted requests, as allowed by the Code, for Minor Exception DRC2017-00879 and Variance DRC2017-00831 to allow flexibility in the requirements for parking and parking setback; and d. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The project site has been previously disturbed (development of the service station use) and by the surrounding residential, commercial, industrial, and educational development, and the project has been designed to appropriately address all applicable development standards. The project site is suitable for a service station land use, provides appropriate site access, has all utility services available, and can be conditioned to meet all related performance criteria and development standards for a service station and carwash facility. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends the City Council adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. (i) A comment letter was received from the Burrtec Waste Industries, dated May 18, 2018, in response to the circulated ISIMND. Burrtec's comment addressed AB 341 and AB 1826, which requires that commercial businesses generating more than 4 cubic yards of waste per week participate in a commercial waste recycling program, and that businesses E1 --E6 Pg202 Page 628 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-39 DR DRC2015-00682 —ARCHIBALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 4 that sell food must also participate in a food waste recycling program. The project will require at least a 3 -cubic yard bin each for waste and mixed recyclables and should also make provisions for an additional bin for food waste. Conditions of approval require the applicant to provide adequate trash bins for waste, recyclables, and food waste. (ii) A comment letter was received from the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), dated May 23, 2018, in response to the circulated ISIMND. The DTSC's comments questioned whether any historic uses at the project site may have resulted in any release of hazardous waste/substances, if a Phase 1 Environmental Assessment had been prepared, if there are any PCB containing transformers on-site, whether underground storage tanks were used at the site, and if there is soil contamination or groundwater contamination on-site. A Phase 1 Environmental Assessment has not been prepared, the applicant indicated that there are none, and have never been, any PCB containing transformers on the project site, the underground storage tanks were previously removed, and provided a Remedial Action Completion Certificate, dated November 5, 2001. The Remedial Action Completion Certificate was issued by the County of San Bernardino Fire Department, Office of the Fire Marshall, Hazardous Materials Division for the project site indicating that no further remedial action is required. On June 13, 2018, the DTSC indicated that they have reviewed the applicant's response and had no further comments. (iii) A comment letter was received from the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), dated May 29, 2018, in response to the circulated IS/MND. The SCAQMD's comments identified that since a permit is required by the SCAQMD they should be identified as a Responsible Agency on the MND and that the Final MND should demonstrate compliance with SCAQMD Rules. The SCAQMD indicated that the Air Quality analysis did not include operational ROG emissions generated from storage tanks or from the fueling process and recommended that a Health Risk Assessment analysis be prepared. The SQAQMD recommended a modification to the Air Quality Mitigation Measure, Short Term (Construction) Emissions from a Tier 3 to a Tier 4. Finally, the SCAQMD recommended utilizing the current CaIEEMod (Version 2016.3.2) in the air quality analysis. On June 6, 2018, the applicant's consultant (MD Acoustics) responded to SCAQMD comments. That response 1) recognized compliance with AQMD Rules 201, 203, and 461; 2) analyzed operational ROG emissions generated from the storage tanks and from the fueling process and found them to be below the daily VOC threshold; 3) identified that the project is below a threshold that would require a Health Risk Assessment; 4) analyzed and acknowledged the distance to sensitive receptors; 5) addressed compliance with CARB Tier 3; and 6) acknowledged that "revising the construction and operational emissions calculations is not expected to change the less than significant findings in the MND." On June 21, 2018, the SCAQMD concurred with the applicant's response and had no further comments; and ET—E6 Pg203 Page 629 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-39 DR DRC2015-00682 —ARCHIBALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 5 b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission therefore recommends the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration; and G. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore recommends the City Council adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project; and d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the City Council's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 90500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) The approval of Design Review DRC2015-00682 is contingent upon City Council approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684. Environmental Mitigation Short Term Construction Emissions 1) During grading activity, all construction equipment (� 150 horsepower) shall be California Air Resources Board (CARB) Tier 3 Certified or better. 2) All clearing, grading, earth -moving, or excavation activities shall cease when winds exceed 25 mph per SCAQMD guidelines in order to limit fugitive dust emissions. 3) The contractor shall ensure that all disturbed unpaved roads and disturbed areas within the Project are watered at least three (3) times daily during dry weather. Watering, with complete coverage of disturbed areas, shall occur at least three times a day, preferably in the midmorning, afternoon, and after work is done for the day. l;1-1;6 Pg204 Page 630 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-39 DR DRC2015-00682 —ARCHIBALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 6 4) The contractor shall ensure that traffic speeds on unpaved roads and Project site areas are reduced to 15 miles per hour or less. 5) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 6) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. 7) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 8) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction -grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 9) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 10) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 11) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through - seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. E1 --E6 Pg205 Page 631 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-39 DR DRC2015-00682 -- ARCHIBALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 7 • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24 -inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 12) The site shall be treated with water or other soil -stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB)) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 13) Chemical soil -stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. Lonq Term Project Operational Impacts 14) Provide preferential parking to high occupancy vehicles and shuttle services. 15) Schedule truck deliveries and pickups during off-peak hours. 16) Improve thermal integrity of the buildings and reduce thermal load with automated time clocks or occupant sensors. 17) Landscape with native and/or drought -resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 18) Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planting programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC -01 measure. 19) All commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high- efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 20) All commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. Biological Resources 1) Three days prior to the removal of vegetation or ground -disturbing activities, a breeding bird survey that is in conformance with the Migratory Bird Act shall be required to determine whether nesting is E1—E6 Pg206 Page 632 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-39 DR DRC2015-00682—ARCHIBALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 8 occurring. Occupied nests shall not be disturbed unless a qualified biologist verifies through non-invasive methods that either (a) the adult birds have not begun egg -laying or incubation; or (b) the juveniles from the occupied nests are foraging independently and are capable of independent survival. if the biologist is unable to verify one of the above conditions, then no disturbance shall occur within 300 feet of non -raptor nests, and within 5,000 feet of raptor nests, during the breeding season to avoid abandonment of the young. If nests are discovered, they shall be avoided through the establishment of an appropriate buffer setback, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. The temporary "no construction" area shall be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and have left the nest, construction in the area may resume. Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor, construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. • Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with Section 21083.2 Archaeological resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, including but not limited to, avoiding archaeological sites, capping or covering sites with soil, planning the site as a park or green space or paying an in-kind mitigation fee. Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. E1—E6 Pg207 Page 633 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-39 DR DRC2015-00682 — ARCHIBALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 9 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i,e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth -disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth -disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. Geology and Soils 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil -stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re -planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PMio emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PMto emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil -stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PMio emissions. E1 --E6 Pg208 Page 634 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-39 DR DRC2015-00682 — ARCHIBALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 10 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Cumulative Short Term (Construction)GHG Emissions 1) The project must comply with all rules that assist in reducing short- term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAQMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil -stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 2) The construction contractor shall select construction equipment based on low -emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures' specification. 3) Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 minutes. 4) Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline- or diesel -powered engines where feasible. 5) Construction should be timed so as not to interfere with peak -hour traffic. 6) Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be supported and encouraged for the construction crew. Cumulative Long Term (Operational) GHG Emissions 7) Construction and Building materials shall be produced and/or manufactured locally. Use "Green Building Materials" such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low -volatile -organic - compound (VOC) materials. 8) Design all buildings to exceed California Building Code Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of; • Increased insulation. • Limit air leakage through the structure. • Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances. • Landscape and develop site utilizing shade, prevailing winds and landscaping. • Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems. E 1--E6 Pg209 Page 635 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-39 DR DRC2015-00682 — ARCHIBALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 11 • Install light colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements. • Install solar or light emitting diodes (LED's) for outdoor lighting. 9) Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and include the following; • Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. • Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available and/or install the infrastructure to deliver and use reclaimed water. • Design building to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets, dual flush toilets and waterless urinals/water heaters. Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non- vegetated surfaces. 10) Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educate employees about reducing waste and about recycling. Hydrology and Water Quality Construction Activities 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. E1—E6 Pg210 Page 636 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-39 DR DRC2015-00682—ARCHIBALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 12 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 5) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Post -Construction Operational 6) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The VVQMP shall identify the structural and non- structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 7) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Pians for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. 8) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Site Drainage Plan (SPB Engineering, May 2017) to reduce construction pollutants from entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. Norse Exterior 1) Prior to the issuance of any grading plans or building plans, the applicant shall submit a construction -related noise mitigation plan for Planning Director review and approval. This plan shall depict the E1 --E6 Pg211 Page 637 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-39 DR DRC2015-00682 --ARCHIBALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 13 location of construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction of the project. 2) Business operations shall maintain a noise level at 60dB or less during the hours of 10 p.m. until 7 a.m. No loading and unloading activities including opening, closing, or other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials, garbage cans, or other similar objects between the hours of 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to residential areas. 3) During all project site excavation and grading, the project contractors shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers consistent with the manufacturers' standards. 4) The project contractor shall place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors nearest the project site. 5) The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction -related noise sources and noise -sensitive receptors nearest the project site during all project construction. 6) The construction contractor shall obtain the City's approval for its haul plan, with the planned haul truck routes avoiding residential areas to the extent feasible. 7) The construction contractor shall change the timing and/or sequence of the noisiest construction operations to avoid sensitive times of the day. 8) During construction, the contractor shall ensure all construction equipment is equipped with appropriate noise attenuating devices. 9) Idling equipment shall be turned off when not in use. 10) Equipment shall be maintained so that vehicles and their loads are secured from rattling and banging. 11) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:OO p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 12) Prior to issuance of grading or building permits, the applicant shall submit evidence of noise control measures that include 1) vibratory pile drivers or other pile driving noise :controls, 2) temporary sound curtains at least 8 feet tall placed around all noise producing equipment, and 3) fitting appropriate mufflers that achieve a minimum 20 dBA reduction in construction -related noise levels. E1 --E6 Pg212 Page 638 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO, 18-39 DR DRC2015-00682 — ARCHIBALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 14 13) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 14) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise Mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes and include appropriate noise mitigation measures. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. Tribal Cultural Resources 1) The applicant shall contact the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation (GBMI-KN) and the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians (SMBMI) to discuss Tribal Monitoring of the project during all ground disturbing activities, and any trenching below the initial grade level, to ensure that cultural resources that may be encountered during ground disturbances are protected and preserved for study. The monitor(s) must be approved by the Tribal Representatives and will be present on-site during ground disturbing activities. The Native American Monitor(s) will complete monitoring logs on a daily basis. The logs will provide descriptions of the daily activities, including construction activities, locations, soil, and any cultural materials identified. In addition, the monitor(s) will be required to provide insurance certificates, including liability insurance, for any archaeological resource(s) encountered during grading and excavation activities pertinent to the provisions outlined in the California Environmental Quality Act, California Public Resources Code Division 13, and Section 21083.2 (a) through (k). The on-site monitoring shall end when the project site grading and excavation activities are completed, or when the Tribal Representatives and monitor have indicated that the site has a low potential for archeological resources. The applicant shall submit the results of these consultations to the City prior to issuance of grading permits for the project site. 2) In the event that human remains or funerary objects are encountered during any activities associated with the project, work in the El --E6 pg213 Page 639 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-39 DR DRC2015-00682 — ARCH I BALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 15 immediate vicinity (within a 100 -foot buffer of the find) shall cease and the County Coroner shall be contacted pursuant to State Health and Safety Code §7050.5, and that code shall be enforced for the duration of the project. Prior to the start of ground disturbing activities, the land owner shall arrange a designated site location within the footprint of the project for the respectful reburial of the human remains and/or ceremonial objects. Any discoveries of human skeletal material shall be immediately reported to the County Coroner. The monitor will then notify the Qualified Archaeologist and the construction manager who will call the coroner. Work will continue to be diverted while the coroner determines whether the remains are Native American. The discovery is to be kept confidential and secure to prevent any further disturbance. If Native American, the coroner will notify the NAHC as mandated by state law who will then appoint a Most Likely Descendent. In the case where discovered human remains cannot be fully documented and recovered on the same day, the remains will be covered with muslin cloth and a steel plate that can be moved by heavy equipment placed over the excavation opening to protect the remains. if this type of steel plate is not available, a 24-hour guard should be posted outside of working hours. The Tribe(s) will make every effort to recommend diverting the project and keeping the remains in situ and protected. If the project cannot be diverted, it may be determined that burials will be removed. The Tribe(s) will work closely with the Qualified Archaeologist to ensure that the excavation is treated carefully, ethically, and respectfully. If data recovery is approved by the Tribe(s), documentation shall be taken which includes at a minimum detailed descriptive notes and sketches. Additional types of documentation shall be approved by the Tribe(s) for data recovery purposes. Cremations will either be removed in bulk or by means as necessary to ensure completely recovery of all material. If the discovery of human remains includes 4 or more burials, the location is considered a cemetery and a separate treatment plan shall be created. The project applicant shall consult with the Tribe(s) regarding avoidance of all cemetery sites. Once complete, a final report of all activities is to be submitted to the NAHC. The Tribe(s) do NOT authorize any scientific study or the utilization of any invasive diagnostics on human remains. 3) In the event that Native American cultural resources are discovered during project activities, all work in the immediate vicinity of the find (within a 60 -foot buffer) shall cease and a qualified archaeologist meeting Secretary of Interior standards shall be hired to assess the find. Work on the other portions of the project outside of the buffered area may continue during this assessment period. The archaeologist shall contact the GBMI-KN and the SMBMI for input regarding the preservation, retention and final disposition of any discovered cultural resources. The archaeologist shall prepare a mitigation plan and technical resources management report, which shall document the E1—E6 Pg214 Page 640 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-39 DR DRC2015-00682 — ARCHIBALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 16 inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Additionally, the GBM1-KN and the SMBMI will be contacted if any such find occurs and be provided information and permitted/invited to perform a site visit when the archaeologist makes his/her assessment, so as to provide Tribal input. , All archaeological resources unearthed by project construction activities shall be evaluated by the Qualified Archaeologist and Native Monitor. If the resources are. Native American in origin, the Tribe(s) shall coordinate with the landowner regarding treatment and curation of these resources. Typically, the Tribe(s) will request reburial or preservation for educational purposes. If a resource is determined by the Qualified Archaeologist to constitute a "historical resource" pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(a) or has a "unique archaeological resource" pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21083.2(8), the Qualified Archaeologist shall coordinate with the applicant and the City to develop a formal treatment plan that would serve to reduce impacts to the resources. The treatment plan established for the resources shall be in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(f) for historical resources and Public Resources Code Sections 21083.2(b) for unique archaeological resources. Preservation in place (i.e., avoidance) is the preferred manner of treatment. If preservation in place is not feasible, treatment may include implementation of archaeological data recovery excavations to remove the resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and analysis. Any historic archaeological material that is not Native American in origin shall be curated at a public, non-profit institution with a research interest in the materials, such as the San Bernardino County Museum, if such an institution agrees to accept the material. If no institution accepts the archaeological material, they shall be donated to a local school or historical society in the area for educational purposes. 4) In the event that significant Native American historical resources, as defined by CEQA (as amended, 2015), are discovered and avoidance cannot be ensured, an SOI -qualified archaeologist shall be retained to develop a cultural resources Treatment Plan, as well as a Discovery and Monitoring Plan, the drafts of which shall be provided to the GBM1-KN and the SMBMI for review and comment. All in -field investigations, assessments, and/or data recovery enacted pursuant to the finalized Treatment Plan shall be monitored by a GBMI-KN and SMBMI Tribal Participant(s). The Lead Agency and/or applicant shall, in good` faith, consult with GBMI-KN and the SMBMI on the disposition and treatment of any artifacts or other cultural materials encountered during the project. 5) Non -Native American artifacts shall be inventoried, assessed, and analyzed for cultural affiliation, personal affiliation (prior ownership), E1 --E6 Pg215 Page 641 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO, 18-39 DR DRC2015-00682—ARCHIBALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 17 function, and temporal placement. Subsequent to analysis and reporting, these artifacts shall be subjected to curation or returned to the Property Owner/Developer, as deemed appropriate. Once ground -altering activities have ceased or the Project Archaeologist determines that monitoring activities are no longer necessary, monitoring activities may be discontinued following notification to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. 6, The Secretary to this Commissionshall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF JULY 2018. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NJ ATTEST: Francisco Oaxaca, Chairman Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of July 2018, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: E1—l;6 Pg216 Page 642 Project #: Project fume Location: Project Type: Conditions of Approval Community Development Department DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 DR 111 Archibald Oil 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Approval is for a request to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re-establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 square foot car wash on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue. 2. The proposed signage/architectural treatment on the fuel canopy roof shall be removed and the existing terra cotta tiles shall remain. 3. The applicant shall comply with AB 341 and AB 1826, which require that commercial businesses generating more than four cubic yards of waste per week participate in a commercial waste recycling program, and that businesses that sell food must also participate in a food waste recycling program. The project will require at least a three cubic yard bin each for waste and mixed recyclables and shall also make provisions for an additional bin for food waste. Standard Conditions of Approval 4. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet. 5. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 17 feet long with a required 1 -foot overhang (e.g., over a curb stop). 6. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. 7. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/plazas/ recreational uses. 8. Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours. 9. The lighting fixture design shall compliment the architectural program. It shall include the plaza area lighting fixtures, building lighting fixtures (exterior), and parking lot lighting fixtures. 10. The Master Plan is approved in concept only. Future development for (each building pad/parcel) shall be subject to a separate Development/Design Review process. 11. Signs shall be conveniently posted for "no overnight parking" and for "employee parking only." PrNed- 5125/20118 www.CityofRC.us E1—E6 Pg217 Page 643 I Project #: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR 111 Archibald Oil Location: Project Type: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 12. All operations and businesses shall be conducted to comply with the following standards which shall be incorporated into the lease agreements for all tenants: a. Noise Level - All commercial activities shall not create any noise that would exceed an exterior noise level of 65 dB during the hours of 10 p.m. until 7 a.m. and 70 dB during the hours of 7 a.m. until. 10 P.M. b. Loading and Unloading - No person shall cause the loading, unloading, opening, closing, or other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials, garbage cans, or other similar objects between the hours of 10 p.m. and 7@.m. unless otherwise specified herein, in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to a residential area. 13. Any outdoor vending machines shall be recessed into the building faces and shall not extend into the pedestrian walkways. The design details shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 14. Textured pavement shall be provided across circulation aisle, pedestrian walkway, and plaza. They shall be of brick/tile pavers, exposed aggregate, integral color concrete, or any combination thereof. Full samples shall be submitted for Planning Department review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 15. Trash collection shall occur between the hours of 7:00 am and 7:00 pm only. 16. Provide for the following design features in each trash enclosure, to the satisfaction of the Planning Department: a. Architecturally integrated into the design of (the shopping center/the project). b. Separate pedestrian access that does not require the opening of the main doors and to include self-closing pedestrian doors. c. Large enough to accommodate two trash bins. d. Roll -up doors. e. Trash bins with counter -weighted lids. f. Architecturally treated overhead shade trellis. g. Chain link screen on top to prevent trash from blowing out of the enclosure and designed to be hidden from view. 17. The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and in no event shall trash and debris remain for more than 24 hours. 18. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs. - 19. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for Planning Department and Engineering Services Department approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. Printed: 512512oi8 www.C1tyofRC.us Page 2 of 17 E1—E6 Pg218 Page 644 Project#: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR III Archibald Oil Location: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 20. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and Development Code regulations. 21. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Department review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 22. A minimum of 20 percent of trees planted within industrial projects, and a minimum of 30 percent within commercial and office projects, shall be specimen size trees - 24 -inch box or larger. 23. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15 -gallon tree for every three parking stalls. 24. All ground -mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Department. 25. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building. 26. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water efficient landscaping per Development Code Chapter 17.82. 27. For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll -up doors and service doors to match main building colors. 28. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections shall be screened from all sides and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department. Such screening "shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. Any roof -mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically more than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet, shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent nature with the building design and is detailed consistent with the building. Any roof -mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically less than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet shall be painted consistent with the color scheme of the building. Details shall be included in building plans. 29. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. Printed: 512512018 WWW.CItyofR..u5 Page 3 of 17 E1—E6 Pg219 Page 645 Project #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 DR 111 Archibald Oil 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. - Planning Department ROJECT: PlanningDepartment Standard Conditions of Approval 30. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 31. For multi -family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. 32. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption and Mitigated Negative Declaration fee in the amount of $2,330.75. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing. 33. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 34. Any modification or intensification of the approved use, including revisions in the operations of the business including changes to the operating days/hours; change in the location on-site or within the building of the use/activity that is approved by this Conditional Use Permit; improvements including new building construction; and/or other modifications/intensification beyond what is specifically approved by this Conditional Use Permit, shall require the review and approval by the Planning Director prior to submittal of documents for plan checkloccupancy, construction, commencement of the activity, and/or issuance of a business license. The Planning Director may determine that modifications or intensifications of use require the submittal of an application to modify this Conditional Use Permit for review by the City. 35. Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in accordance with the Development Code Section 17.80.050, and so noted on the grading plans. The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans. 36. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 37. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Services Department. 38. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. I Printed: 5/2512018 www.Cityofr2C.us Page 4 of 17 EZ—E6 Pg220 Page 646 Project #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 DR N Archibald Oil 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 39. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 40. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director and Police Department (909-477-2800) prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 41. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Services Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance and final acceptance granted prior to occupancy. 42. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 43. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 44. Revised Site Plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 45. Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock. Other stone veneers may be manufactured products. 46. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, and the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 47. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes. Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions Printed: 5/25/2048 www.CityofRC.tjs Page 5 of 17 E1 --E6 Pg221 Page 647 Project #: Project Name Location: Project Type: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 DR III Archibald Oil 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Archibald Avenue frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Major Arterial' standards as required and including: a. Curb adjacent sidewalk may remain, repair damaged sidewalk as required. b. Remove the most southerly drive approach on Archibald Avenue and replace with curb and gutter. c. A total of 50 feet on Archibald Avenue, measured from the street centerline, shall be dedicated to the City. d. Relocate existing traffic signal equipment. e. Drive approach shall be a minimum width of 35 feet per City Standard Plan 101, Type C. 2. The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) on the project side of Archibald Avenue shall be undergrounded to the first pole offsite north of the north project boundary and to the first pole offsite south of Arrow Route, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever comes first. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development (redevelopment) as it occurs on the opposite side of the street. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public improvement being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. 3. Arrow Route frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Major Arterial' standards as required and including: a. Provide right-of-way dedication and construct right turn lane per City Standard Plan 119. b. Relocate existing traffic signal equipment. c. Relocate the existing street light, as it is located at the proposed driveway. d. Drive approach shall be a minimum width of 35 feet per City Standard Plan 101, Type C. e. Provide a signing and striping plan. Printed: 5125/2018 www.CityofRC.us Page 6 of 17 E1 --E6 Pg222 Page 648 Project#: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name. DR /// Archibald Oil Location: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services De artment Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 4. The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications F and electrical) on the project side of Arrow Route shall be undergrounded to the first pole offsite east of the east project boundary to the first pole offsite west of Archibald Avenue, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever comes first. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development (redevelopment) as it occurs on the opposite side of the street. if the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public improvement being accepted by the City, ali rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. 5. Reconstruct access ramp at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route to comply with current ADA requirements. A detail will have to be added to the street improvement plan showing the design details, elevations, and grades of the access ramp to substantiate they comply with ADA requirements. Design shall be completed and improvements secured for prior to issuance of Building permit. The reconstruction along with all public improvements shall be completed prior to occupancy. 6. Provide an easement along the easterly portion of the 8477 Archibald Avenue, APN 0208-291-05 for the benefit of the parcel to the east, APN 0208-291-06 for ingress and egress prior to building permit issuance. When the parcel to the east develops they will be required to provide an easement along the westerly portion of their property for ingress and egress, for a shared driveway. If the parcel to the east APN 0208-291-06 will allow the easement along the westerly portion of their property, concurrently with the development of 8477 Archibald Avenue, APN 0208-291-05, the driveway may be centered between the two properties. Standard Conditions of Approval 7. Corner property line cutoff shall be dedicated per City Standards. 8. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be fled with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 9. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Permits issued on or after June 2, 2014, must complete the reimbursement process through the City's Accelerate online portal within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project or the deposit will be forfeited. Permits issued before June 2, 2014, require the following when applying for a deposit reimbursement: a completed CD -2 form, a copy of the cashier's receipt showing the deposit amount, and all weight tickets. Instructions and forms are available at the City's web site, www.CityofRC.us, under City Hall; Engineering; Environmental Programs. Printed: 5125!2018 www.CityofRC.us page 7 of 17 E1—E6 Pg223 Page 649 Project #: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR 111 Archibald Oil Location: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 10 -Add the following note to any private landscape plans that show street trees: "All improvements within the public right-of-way, including street trees, shall be installed per the public improvement plans." If there is a discrepancy between the public and private plans, the street improvement plans will govern. 11. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 12. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 13. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the- development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. Printed: 5125/2018 www.CityofRC.us Page 8 of 17 E1—E6 Pg224 Page 650 Project #: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR 111 Archibald Oil Location: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Enaineerina Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 14. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the . City 'Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3 -inch pvc with pull rope or as specified. e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per latest ADA standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. 15. Street trees, a minimum of 15 -gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. Fire Prevention I New Construction Unit Standard Conditions of Approval 1. New canopy shall not reduce the clearance of the existing canopy. When the entitlement process is approved, submit tank and fuel dispensing plans to the San Bernardino County Fire Department, Hazardous Materials Division. Subsequent to their approval, bring approval letter to Building and Safety for building permit issuance. Canopy, store, and carwash plans shall be submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department. Building and Safety Services Department Printed: 5125t2018 www.CityofRC.us us Page 9 of 77 EI --E6 Pg225 Page 651 Project #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 DR 111 Archibald Oil 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Building and Safety Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. When the Design Review is approved submit complete construction drawings including structural calculations to Building and Safety for plan review in accordance with the current edition of the CA Building and Fire Codes. A soils report is required for new structures, All disabled access to the site and building must be provided in accordance to current regulations at the time of plan check submittal. New trash enclosure roof structure must be of fire retardant lumber or non-combustible materials. Classify existing canopy as an S-1 occupancy. Installation of underground fuel tanks and dispensing fuel pumps require review and pian check approval from San Bernardino County Fire Department, Hazardous Materials Division. CVWD - Provide a plumbing plan submittal to the local water purveyor. Building and Safety will not issue building permits until a plumbing first release is obtained by the applicant from CVWD. New area lights shall be minimum 14'-6" clear above the drive aisle, where lights overhang the drive aisle. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 1. NONRESIDENTIAL MANDATORY MEASURES — CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE — Prior to the issuance of any building permit the applicant shall comply with Section 5.106.10 (Grading and paving) of the current adopted California Green Building Standards Code: Construction plans shall indicate how site grading or a drainage system will manage all surface water flows to keep water from entering buildings. Examples of methods to manage surface water include, but are not limited to, the following: 1. Swales. 2. Water collection and disposal systems. 3. French drains. 4. Water retention gardens. 5. Other water measures which keep surface water away from buildings and aid in groundwater recharge. Exception: Additions and alterations not altering the drainage path. Printed: 512512018 www.CityofRC.us Page 10 of 17 E1—E6 Pg226 Page 652 Project #: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR Ill Archibald Oil Location: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 2. NONRESIDENTIAL MANDATORY MEASURES — CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE — Prior to the issuance of any building permit the applicant shall comply with Section 5.106.1 (Storm water pollution prevention) of the current adopted California Green Building Standards Code: Newly construction projects and additions which disturb less than one acre of land shall prevent the pollution of stormwater runoff from the construction activities through one or more of the following measures: 1.106.1.1 Local Ordinance — Comply with a lawfully enacted stormwater management and/or erosion control ordinance. 1,106.1.2 Best Management Practices (BMP) — Prevent the loss of soil through wind or water erosion by implementing an effective combination of erosion and sediment control and good housekeeping BMP. 1. Soil loss BMP that should be considered for implementation as appropriate for each project include, but are not limited to, the following: a. Scheduling construction activity. b. Preservation of natural features, vegetation and soil. c. Drainage swales or lined ditches to control stormwater flow. d. Mulching or hydroseeding to stabilize disturbed soils. e. Erosion control to protect slopes. f. Protection of storm drain inlets (gravel bags or catch basin inserts). g. Perimeter sediment control (perimeter silt fence, fiber rolls). h. Sediment trap or sediment basin to retain sediment on site. i. Stabilized construction exits. j. Wind erosion control. k. Other soil loss BMP acceptable to the enforcing agency. 2. Good housekeeping BMP to manage construction equipment, materials and wastes that should be considered for implementation as appropriate for each project include, but are not limited to, the following: a. Material handling and waste management. b. Building materials stockpile management. c. Management of washout areas (concrete, paints, stucco, etc.). d. Control of vehicle/equipment fueling to contractors staging area. e. Vehicle and equipment cleaning performed off site. f. Spill prevention and control. g. Other housekeeping BMP acceptable to the enforcing agency (City of Rancho Cucamonga). 3. As the project is proposing to move less than 50 cubic yards of earth, the project is conditioned to provide a precise drainage plan showing the elevation(s) of the new structures, new drainage features, including but not limited to, curbs and v -gutters, drainage pipe, catch basins, along with locations of new pavement, removal and replacement pavement(s), and pavement overlays. Printed; 5!25!2678 www.QtyofRC.us Page 79 of 17 E1—E6 Pg227 Page 653 Project#: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR 111 Archibald Oil Location: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 4. Prior to approval of the final project -specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project -specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". 5. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the Building Official, or his designee, the civil engineer of record shall file a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Post Construction Storm Water Treatment Devices As -Built Certificate with the Environmental Programs Coordinator, City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Services Department. 6. As the use of drywelis are proposed for the structural storm water treatment device, to meet the infiltration requirements of the current Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Systems (MS4) Permit, adequate source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration shall be evaluated prior to infiltration and discussed in the final project -specific Water Quality Management Pian document. Printed: 512512aie www.CityofRC.us Page 12 of 77 E1—E6 Pg228 Page 654 Project #. DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR 111 Archibald Oil Location: 8477 ARCH IBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 7. GROUND WATER PROTECTION: Prior to approval of the final project specific water quality management plan (WQMP), the WQMP document shall meet the requirements of the State Water Resources Control Board Order No. 138-2010-0036 (NPDES No. CAS 618036), the San Bernardino County Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Separation (MS4) Permit reads: Section XI.D(Water Quality Management Plan Requirements).8(Groundwater Protection): Treatment Control BMPs utilizing infiltration (exclusive of incidental infiltration and BMPs not designed to primarily function as infiltration devices (such as grassy swales, detention basins, vegetated buffer strips, constructed wetlands, etc.)] must comply with the following minimum requirements to protect groundwater: a. Use of structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause or contribute to an exceedance of ground water quality objectives. b. Source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration should be evaluated prior to infiltration. c. Adequate pretreatment of runoff prior to infiltration shall be required in gas stations and large commercial parking lots. (NOTE: The State Water Quality Control Board defines a large commercial parking lot as '100,000 sq. ft. or more of commercial development to include parking lot (with 100 or more vehicle traffics), OR, by means of 5,000sgft or more of allowable space designated for parking purposes'). d. Unless adequate pre-treatment of runoff is provided prior to infiltration structural infiltration treatment BMPs must not be used for areas of industrial or light industrial activity{77}, areas subject to high vehicular traffic (25,000 or more daily traffic); car washes; fleet storage areas; nurseries; or any other high threat to water quality land uses or activities. e. Class V injection wells or dry wells must not be placed in areas subject to vehicular{78} repair or maintenance activities(79), such as an auto body repair shop, automotive repair shop, new and used car dealership, specialty repair shop (e.g., transmission and muffler repair shop) or any facility that does any vehicular repair work. f. Structural infiltration BMP treatment shall not be used at sites that are known to have soil and groundwater contamination. g. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall be located at least 100 feet horizontally from any water supply wells. h. The vertical distance from the bottom of any infiltration structural treatment BMP to the historic high groundwater mark shall be at least 10 -feet. Where the groundwater basins do not support beneficial uses, this vertical distance criteria may be reduced, provided groundwater quality is maintained. i. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause a nuisance or pollution as defined in Water Code Section 13050. The final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan shall specifically address items, a., b., c., d., and e., above. Printed: 5125/2018 www.CityofRC.us Page 13 of 97 ET—E6 Pg229 Page 655 Project f#: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR 111 Archibald Oil Location: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 8. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 9. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. All dust control sign (s) shall be located outside of the public right of way. 10. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on-site construction where possible, and shall provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 11. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 12. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout "Information for Grading Plans and Permit". 13. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy or final sign off by the Building Inspector the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) storm water treatment devices and best management practices (BMP). 14. The applicant shall provide a copy of a completed EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) for each underground infiltration device, with the Facility ID Number assigned, to the Building and Safety Services Department Official prior to issuance of the Grading Permit and/or approval of the project -specific Water Quality Management Plan. A copy of EPA Form 7520-16 shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set, and a copy of said form shall be included in the project -specific Water Quality Management Plan. 15. The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the structural storm water treatment devices, commonly referred to as BMPs, to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 16. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code and/or the California Residential Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 17. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 18. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall(s) on property perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 19. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the grading and parking stall gradient at 5 percent. Accessibility parking current adopted California Building Code. shall obtain written permission from the line(s) or provide a detail(s) showing the drainage plan shall show the maximum stall grades shall be constructed per the, www.CilyofRC.us PrinSed: 5125!2018 Page 14 of 17 E1—E6 Pg230 Page 656 Project #: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR /1/ Archibald Oil Location: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT; Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 20. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100 -feet beyond project boundary. 21. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre -grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owneOre presentative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre -grading meeting is not held � within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over -excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 22. All roof drainage flowing to the public right of way (Arrow Route) must drain under the sidewalk through a parkway culvert approved by the Engineering Department. This shall be shown on both the grading and drainage plan and Engineering Services Department required plans. 23. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the permitted grading plan set shall show in each of the typical sections and the pian view show how the separations between the building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC 1804.3/CRC R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.21CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.2/CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted California Building Code/Residential Code. 24. Private sewer, water, and storm drain- improvements will be designed per the latest adopted California Plumbing Code. Private storm drain improvements shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan. 25. Prior to approval of the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), the WQMP shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 26. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 27. The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person /company on a biennial basis for the Class V Injection Wells/underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. Printed; 5/25/2018 www.CityofRC.us Page 15 of 17 E1—E6 Pg231 Page 657 Project #: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR III Archibald Oil Location: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.- Grading ROJECT:Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 28. The land/property owner shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a biennial basis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. 29. A final project -specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be approved by the Building and Safety Director, or his designee, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit or any building permit. 30. Prior to the start of landscaping operations, the landscape architect and the landscape contractor shall provide a sample of the weed fabric barrier to the Project Planner, City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The weed barrier shall be permeable. 31. The final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP) shall include executed maintenance agreements along with the maintenance guidelines for all proprietary structural storm water treatment devices (BMP's). In the event the applicant cannot get the proprietary device maintenance agreements executed prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant is required to submit a letter to be included within the WQMP document, and scanned and pasted onto the Site and Drainage Plan which states that prior tc issuance of a certificate of occupancy with applicant shall enter into a contract for the -maintenance of the proprietary storm water treatment device. if the proprietary storm water treatment device is part of a residential subdivision, prior to the sale of the residential lot, the developer shall include maintenance agreement(s) as part of the sale of the residential lot to the buyer. A copy of the maintenance agreements to be included in the sale of the property shall be included within the WQMP document. 32. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the project -specific water quality management plan all private storm water catch basin inlets shall include insert filters to capture those pollutants of concern as addressed in the in the final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP). At a minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris. All catch basin insert filters shall be maintained on a regular basis as described in the "Inspection and Maintenance Responsibility for Post Construction BMP" section of the final project -specific water quality management plan. 33. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project -Specific Water Quality Management Plan shall include a completed copy of "Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet" located in Appendix D "Section VII — Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety Recommendations, ..." of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans. The infiltration study shall include the Soil Engineer's recommendations for Appendix D, Table VI1.3: Suitability Assessment Related Considerations for Infiltration Facility Safety Factors". 34. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a drainage easement or letter from the downstream property owners accepting concentrated drainage flows. 35. The Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) has been deemed "Acceptable". Prior to the issuance of a grading permit a final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official. Printed: 5125!2018 www.CityofRC.us Page 16 of 17 E1 --E6 Pg232 Page 658 Project #: DRC2015-00682 CE=QA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR 111 Archibald Oil Location: Project Type: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 36. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 37. All roof drainage flowing to the public right of way (xx Avenue) must drain under the sidewalk through a parkway culvert approved by the Engineering Department. 38. The applicant shall provide a copy of EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) with the Facility ID Number assigned to the Building and Safety Services Department Official prior to issuance of the Grading Permit. 39. The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for the underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 40. Prior to approval of the project -specific storm water quality management plan, the submit to the Building Official, or his designee, a precise grading plan showing the elevations of existing topographical features, and showing the location and proposed proposed structures and drainage of the site. Printed: 5/25/2018 www,CityofRC.us applicant shall location and elevations of Page 17 of 17 E1—E6 Pg233 Page 659 RESOLUTION NO. 18-40 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. DRC2015-00681, A REQUEST TO ESTABLISH A 968 SQUARE FOOT AUTOMATED CAR WASH ASSOCIATED WITH A REQUEST TO ESTABLISH RETAIL SALES IN AN EXISTING 1,728 SQUARE FOOT VACANT SERVICE STATION BUILDING AND RE- ESTABLISH AN EXISTING 1,481 SQUARE FOOT CANOPY WITH 4 FUEL PUMPS ON A 29,456 SQUARE FOOT (0.676 ACRE) PARCEL IN THE LOW MEDIUM (LM) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (PROPOSED GENERAL COMMERCIAL (GC) DISTRICT) AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND ARROW ROUTE, LOCATED AT 8477 ARCHIBALD AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -- APN: 0208-291-05. A. Recitals. 1. Archibald Oil filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit No. DRC2015-00681, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On June 13, 2018, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and continued the application to the June 27, 2018 Planning Commission meeting. 3. On June 27, 2018, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and continued the application to the July 11, 2018 Planning Commission meeting. 4. On July 11, 2018, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 5. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing on July 11, 2018, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route with a street frontage of approximately 170 feet along Archibald Avenue E1—E6 Pg234 Page 660 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-40 CUP DRC2015-00681 — ARCHIBALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 2 and a street frontage of approximately 175 feet along Arrow Route and is presently improved with a vacant service station building and a fuel canopy with 4 fuel pumps; and b. The property to the north of the subject site is designated Low Medium Residential and is improved with the Mulberry Early Education Center. To the west is Archibald Avenue and beyond that the property is designated Office and is vacant. The property to the east is designated Low Medium Residential and contains a single-family house. To the south is Arrow Route and beyond that the property is designated General Commercial and is improved with a commercial center; and C. The application proposes to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re-establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 -square foot car wash on a 29,456 -square foot (0.676 acre) parcel; and d. The project site is located in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (a proposed General Commercial (GC) District and has been designed to comply with the all applicable design standards, except for the number of parking spaces and the minimum parking setback, which are addressed in the corresponding Variance and Minor Exception applications; and e. Eight parking spaces are required for this project; however, due to site constraints, the project site provides 7 parking spaces. The applicant has submitted a request for Minor Exception DRC2017-00879 to allow for a reduction in the required parking by one stall (or 12.5 percent); and f. Automated carwash land uses are a permitted land use in the General Commercial (GC) District, subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit; and g. The project will retain the existing driveway at the northwest corner of the site, close the existing driveway at the southwest corner of the site, and relocate the existing driveway at the southeast corner of the site to a new shared driveway for the project site and the vacant property to the east; both driveways will be provided with decorative paving. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the proposed use is allowed within the applicable zoning district and complies with all other applicable provisions of this zoning code, Municipal Code, General Plan, and any applicable specific plans or city regulations/standards. Within the proposed General Commercial (GC) District, service stations are a permitted land use and carwashes are a permitted land use, subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. The proposed service station facility was designed to be compatible with all applicable development standards of the Development Code, except for the number of parking spaces and the minimum parking setback, which are addressed in the corresponding Variance and Minor Exception applications; and b. That the site is physically suited for the type, density, and intensity of the proposed use including access, utilities, and the absence of physical constraints and can be conditioned to meet all related performance criteria and development standards. The project site is currently developed as a service station land use, although it has been inactive since 2002. E1—E6 P9235 Page 661 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-40 CUP DRC2015-00681 —ARCHIBALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 3 The project site is suitable for a service station land use, provides appropriate site access, has all utility services available, and can be conditioned to meet all related performance criteria and development standards for a service station and carwash facility; and C. That granting the permit would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity in which the project is located. Subject to approval of the related General Plan and Zoning Map Amendments, establishment of the proposed service station and carwash facility will not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity in which the project is located. The project was designed to meet all applicable Development Code standards, performance criteria, and can be conditioned appropriately to minimize any potential impacts to adjacent properties. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends the City Council adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. (i) A comment letter was received from the Burrtec Waste Industries, dated May 18, 2018, in response to the circulated 1SIMND. Burrtec's comment addressed AB 341 and AB 1826, which requires that commercial businesses generating more than 4 cubic yards of waste per week participate in a commercial waste recycling program, and that businesses that sell food must also participate in a food waste recycling program. The project will require at least a 3 -cubic yard bin each for waste and mixed recyclabies and should also make provisions for an additional bin for food waste. Conditions of approval require the applicant to provide adequate trash bins for waste, recyclables, and food waste. (ii) A comment letter was received from the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), dated May 23, 2018, in response to the circulated IS/MND. The DTSC's comments questioned whether any historic uses at the project site may have resulted in any release of hazardous waste/substances, if a Phase 1 Environmental Assessment had been prepared, if there are any PCB containing transformers on-site, whether underground storage tanks were used at the site, and if there is soil contamination or groundwater contamination on-site. A Phase 1 Environmental Assessment has not been prepared, the applicant indicated that there are none, and have never been, any PCB containing transformers on the project site, the underground storage tanks were previously removed, and provided a Remedial Action E1—E6 Pg236 Page 662 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-40 CUP DRC2015-00681 — ARCHIBALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 4 Completion Certificate, dated November 5, 2001, The Remedial Action Completion Certificate was issued by the County of San Bernardino Fire Department, Office of the Fire Marshall, Hazardous Materials Division for the project site indicating that no further remedial action is required. On June 13, 2018, the DTSC indicated that they have reviewed the applicant's response and had no further comments. (iii) A comment letter was received from the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), dated May 29, 2018, in response to the circulated IS/MND. The SCAQMD's comments identified that since a permit is required by the SCAQMD they should be identified as a Responsible Agency on the MND and that the Final MND should demonstrate compliance with SCAQMD Rules. The SCAQMD indicated that the Air Quality analysis did not include operational ROG emissions generated from storage tanks or from the fueling process and recommended that a Health Risk Assessment analysis be prepared. The SQAQMD recommended a modification to the Air Quality Mitigation Measure, Short Term (Construction) Emissions from a Tier 3 to a Tier 4. Finally, the SCAQMD recommended utilizing the current CaIEEMod (Version 2016.3.2) in the air quality analysis. On June 6, 2018, the applicant's consultant (MD Acoustics) responded to SCAQMD comments. That response 1) recognized compliance with AQMD Rules 201, 203, and 461; 2) analyzed operational ROG emissions generated from the storage tanks and from the fueling process and found them to be below the daily VOC threshold; 3) identified that the project is below a threshold that would require a Health Risk Assessment; 4) analyzed and acknowledged the distance to sensitive receptors; 5) addressed compliance with CARB Tier 3; and 6) acknowledged that "revising the construction and operational emissions calculations is not expected to change the less than significant findings in the MND." On June 21, 2018, the SCAQMD concurred with the applicant's response and had no further comments; and b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission therefore recommends the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration; and C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore recommends the City Council adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project; and d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings E1—E6 Pg237 Page 663 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-40 CUP DRC2015-00681—ARCHIBALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 5 upon which the City Council's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) The approval of Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-00681 is contingent upon City Council approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00663 and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684. 2) All conditions of approval as contained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 18-39 for Design Review DRC2015-00682 shall apply. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF JULY 2018, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA r."V r Francisco Oaxaca, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of July 2018, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: E1—E6 Pg238 Page 664 Conditions of Approval Community Development Department Project #-. DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name Location: Project Type: DR 111 Archibald Oil 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Approval is for a request to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re-establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 square foot car wash on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue. 2. The proposed sig nag elarchitectural treatment on the fuel canopy roof shall be removed and the existing terra cotta tiles shall remain. 3. The applicant shall comply with AB 341 and AB 1826, which require that commercial businesses generating more than 'four cubic yards of waste per week participate in a commercial waste recycling program, and that businesses that sell food must also participate in a food waste recycling program. The project will require at least a three cubic yard bin each for waste and mixed recyclables and shall also make provisions for an additional bin for food waste. Standard Conditions of Approval 4. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet. 5. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 17 feet long with a required 1 -foot overhang (e.g., over a curb stop). 6. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. 7. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/plazas/ recreational uses. 8. Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours. 9. The lighting fixture design shall compliment the architectural program. It shall include the plaza area lighting fixtures, building lighting fixtures (exterior), and parking lot lighting fixtures. 10. The Master Plan is approved in concept only. Future development for (each building pad/parcel) shall be subject to a separate Development/Design Review process. 11. Signs shall be conveniently posted for "no overnight parking" and for "employee parking only." P&ited, 512512018 www.CityafRG.us E1—E6 Pg239 Page 665 Project#: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name Location: Project Type: DR Ill Archibald Oil 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 12. All operations and businesses shall be conducted to comply with the following standards which shall be incorporated into the lease agreements for all tenants: a. Noise Level - All commercial activities shall not create any noise that would exceed an exterior noise level of 65 dB during the hours of 10 p.m. until 7 a.m. and 70 dB during the hours of 7 a.m. until 10 p.m. , b. Loading and Unloading - No person shall cause the loading, unloading, opening, closing, or other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials, garbage cans, or other similar objects between the hours of 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. unless otherwise specified herein, in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to a residential area. 13. Any outdoor vending machines shall be recessed into the building faces and shall not extend into the pedestrian walkways. The design details shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 14. Textured pavement shall be provided across circulation aisle, pedestrian walkway, and plaza. They shall be of brick/tile pavers, exposed aggregate, integral color concrete, or any combination thereof. Full samples shall be submitted for Planning Department review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 15. Trash collection shall occur between the hours of 7:00 am and 7:00 pm only. 16. Provide for the following design features in each trash enclosure, to the satisfaction of the Planning Department: a. Architecturally integrated into the design of (the shopping center/the project). b. Separate pedestrian access that does not require the opening of the main doors and to include self-closing pedestrian doors. c. Large enough to accommodate two trash bins. d. Roll -up doors. e. Trash bins with counter -weighted lids. f. Architecturally treated overhead shade trellis. g. Chain link screen on top to prevent trash from blowing out of the enclosure and designed to be hidden from view. 17. The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and in no event shall trash and debris remain for more than 24 hours. 18. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs. 19. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for Planning Department and Engineering Services Department approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. Printed: 5/25/2018 www.CiiyofRC.us Page 2 of 17 E1—E6 Pg240 Page 666 Project #: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR 111 Archibald Oil Location: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning_ Department Standard Conditions of Approval 20. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and Development Code regulations. 21. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Department review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 22. A minimum of 20 percent of trees planted within industrial projects, and a minimum of 30 percent within commercial and office projects, shall be specimen size trees - 24 -inch box or larger. 23. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15 -gallon tree for every three parking stalls. 24. All ground -mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Department. 25. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building. 26. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water efficient landscaping per Development Code Chapter 17.82. 27. For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll -up doors and service doors to match main building colors. 28. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections shall be screened from all sides and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. Any roof -mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically more than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet, shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent nature with the building design and is detailed consistent with the building. Any roof -mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically less than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet shall be painted consistent with the color scheme of the building. Details shall be included in building plans. 29. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. Printed: 512512818 tivwvc.CityofRC.us Page 3 of 17 E1—E6 Pg241 Page 667 Project #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 DR 111 Archibald Oil 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 30. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 31. For multi -family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. 32. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption and Mitigated Negative Declaration fee in the amount of $2,330.75. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing. 33. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 34. Any modification or intensification of the approved use, including revisions in the operations of the business including changes to the operating dayslhours; change in the location on-site or within the building of the uselactivity that is approved by this Conditional Use Permit; improvements including new building construction; and/or other modifications/intensification beyond what is specifically approved by this Conditional Use Permit, shall require the review and approval by the Planning Director prior to submittal of documents for plan check/occupancy, construction, commencement of the activity, and/or issuance of a business license. The Planning Director may determine that modifications or intensifications of use require the submittal of an application to modify this Conditional Use Permit for review by the City. 35. Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in accordance with the Development Code Section 17.80.050, and so noted on the grading plans. The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans. 36. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 37. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Services Department. 38. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master flans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. y Prhtad: 5/25/2018 www.CityofRC.us Page 4 of 17 E1—E6 Pg242 Page 668 Project 4: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Dame: DR 111 Archibald Oil Location: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Plannin Department Standard Conditions of Approval 39. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 40. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director and Police Department (909-477-2800) prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 41. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and State Fire Marsha[ regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Services Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance and final acceptance granted prior to occupancy. 42. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 43. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 44. Revised Site Plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 45. Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock., Other stone veneers may be manufactured products. 46. Trash receptacle(s) are required and number of trash receptacles shall be issuance of Building Permits. 47. The applicant shall contact the U.S. mailboxes. shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, and the subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions Printed: 5/2512018 www.CityofRC.us Page 5 of 17 E1 --E6 Pg243 Page 669 Project #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 DR 111 Archibald Oil 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Archibald Avenue frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Major Arterial" standards as required and including: a. Curb adjacent sidewalk may remain, repair damaged sidewalk as required. b. Remove the most southerly drive approach on Archibald Avenue and replace with curb and gutter. c. A total of 50 feet on Archibald Avenue, measured from the street centerline, shall be dedicated to the City. d. Relocate existing traffic signal equipment. e. Drive approach shall be a minimum width of 35 feet per City Standard Plan 101, Type C. 2. The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) on the project side of Archibald Avenue shall be undergrounded to the first pole offsite north of the north project boundary and to the first pole offsite south of Arrow Route, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever comes first. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development (redevelopment) as it occurs on the opposite side of the street. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public improvement being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. 3. Arrow Route frontage improvements -to be in accordance with City "Major Arterial' standards as required and including: a. Provide right-of-way dedication and construct right turn lane per City Standard Pian 119. b. Relocate existing traffic signal equipment. c. Relocate the existing street light, as it is located at the proposed driveway. d. Drive approach shall be a minimum width of 35 feet per City Standard Plan 101, Type C. e. Provide a signing and striping plan. Printed: 5/2512018 www.CiryofRC.us Page.6 of 17 E1—E6 Pg 244 Page 670 Project #. DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR Ill Archibald Oil Location: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineerinq Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 4. The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) on the project side of Arrow Route shall be undergrounded to the first pole offsite east of the east project boundary to the first pole offsite west of Archibald Avenue, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever comes first. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City adopted cost for tindergrounding from future development (redevelopment) as it occurs on the opposite side of the street. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public improvement being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. 5. Reconstruct access ramp at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route to comply with current ADA requirements. A detail will have to be added to the street improvement plan showing the design details, elevations, and grades of the access ramp to substantiate they comply with ADA requirements. Design shall be completed and improvements secured for prior to issuance of Building permit. The reconstruction along with all public improvements shall be completed prior to occupancy. 6. Provide an easement along the easterly portion of the 8477 Archibald Avenue, APN 0208-291-05 for the benefit of the parcel to the east, APN 0208-291-06 for ingress and egress prior to building permit issuance. When the parcel to the east develops they will be required to provide an easement along the westerly portion of their property for ingress and egress, for a shared driveway. If the parcel to the east APN 0208-291-06 will allow the easement along the westerly portion of their property, concurrently with the development of 8477 Archibald Avenue, APN 0208-291-05, the driveway may be centered between the two properties. Standard Conditions of Approval 7. Corner property line cutoff shall be dedicated per City Standards. 8. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 9. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Permits issued on or after June 2, 2014, must complete the reimbursement process through the City's Accelerate online portal within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project or the deposit will be forfeited. Permits issued before June 2, 2014, require the following when applying for a deposit reimbursement: a completed CD -2 form, a copy of the cashier's receipt showing the deposit amount, and all weight tickets. Instructions and forms are available at the City's web site, www.CityofRC.us, under City Hall; Engineering; Environmental Programs. Printed 512512018 www•CityofRC.us Page 7 of 17 E1 --E6 Pg245 Page 671 Project #.- DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR 111 Archibald Oil Location: Project Type: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT; Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 10. Add the following note to any private landscape plans that show street trees: "All improvements within the public right-of-way, including street trees, shall be installed per the public improvement plans." If there is a discrepancy between the public and private plans, the street improvement plans will govern. 11. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 12. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 13. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these 'conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. Printed: 5/2512018 vAm.CifyofRC.us f Page 8 of 17 E1 --E6 Pg246 Page 672 Project #: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR 111 Archibald Oil Location: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineerinq Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 14. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull 'boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3 -inch pvc with pull rope or as specified. e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per latest ADA standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross .sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. 15. Street trees, a minimum of 15 -gallon size or larger, shalt be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. Fire Prevention I New Construction Unit Standard Conditions of Approval 1. New canopy shall not reduce the clearance of the existing canopy. When the entitlement process is approved, submit tank and fuel dispensing plans to the San Bernardino County Fire Department, Hazardous Materials Division. Subsequent to their approval, bring approval letter to Building and Safety for building permit issuance. Canopy, store, and carwash plans shall be submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department. Building and Safety Services Department Printed: 512512018 awwi.CityofRC.us Page 9 of 17 E1—E6 Pg247 Page 673 Project #: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR 111 Archibald Oil Location: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Building and Safety Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. When the Design Review is approved submit complete construction drawings including structural calculations to Building and Safety for plan review in accordance with the current edition of the CA Building and Fire Codes. A soils report is required for new structures. All disabled access to the site and building must be provided in accordance to current regulations at the time of plan check submittal. New trash enclosure roof structure must be of fire retardant lumber or non-combustible materials. Classify existing canopy as an S-1 occupancy Installation of underground fuel tanks and dispensing fuel pumps require review and .plan check approval from San Bernardino County Fire Department, Hazardous Materials Division. CVWD - Provide a plumbing plan submittal to the local water purveyor. Building and Safety will not issue building permits until a plumbing first release is obtained by the applicant from CVWD. New area lights shall be minimum 14'-6" clear above the drive aisle, where lights overhang the drive aisle. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 1. NONRESIDENTIAL MANDATORY MEASURES -- CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE -- Prior to the issuance of any building permit the applicant shall comply with Section 5.106.10 (Grading and paving) of the current adopted California Green Building Standards Code: Construction plans shall indicate how site grading or a drainage system will manage all surface water flows to keep water from entering buildings. Examples of methods to manage surface water include, but are not limited to, the following: 1. Swales. 2. Water collection and disposal systems. 3. French drains. 4. Water retention gardens. 5. Other water measures which keep surface water away from buildings and aid in groundwater recharge. Exception: Additions and alterations not altering the drainage path. Printed: 5!2512018 vAArW.CityofRC.us Page 10 of 97 ET—E6 Pg248 Page 674 Project#: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR 111 Archibald Oil Location: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading_Section Standard Conditions of Approval 2. NONRESIDENTIAL MANDATORY MEASURES -- CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE — Prior to the issuance of any building permit the applicant shall comply with Section 5.106.1 (Storm water pollution prevention) of the current adopted California Green Building Standards Code: Newly construction projects and additions which disturb less than one acre of land shall prevent the pollution of stormwater runoff from the construction activities through one or more of the following measures: 1.106.1.1 Local Ordinance — Comply with a lawfully enacted stormwater management and/or erosion control ordinance. 1.106.1.2 Best Management Practices (BMP) — Prevent the loss of soil through wind or water erosion by implementing an effective combination of erosion and sediment control and good housekeeping BMP. 1. Soil loss BMP that should be considered for implementation as appropriate for each project include, but are not limited to, the following: a. Scheduling construction activity. b. Preservation of natural features, vegetation and soil. c. Drainage swales or lined ditches to control stormwater flow. d. Mulching or hydroseeding to stabilize disturbed soils. e. Erosion control to protect slopes. f. Protection of storm drain inlets (gravel bags or catch basin inserts). g. Perimeter sediment control (perimeter silt fence, fiber rolls). h. Sediment trap or sediment basin to retain sediment on site. i. Stabilized construction exits. j. Wind erosion control. k. Other soil loss BMP acceptable to the enforcing agency. 2. Good housekeeping BMP to manage construction equipment, materials and wastes that should be considered for implementation as appropriate for each project include, but are not limited to, the following: a. Material handling and waste management. b. Building materials stockpile management. c. Management of washout areas (concrete, paints, stucco, etc.). d. Control of vehicle/equipment fueling to contractors staging area. e. Vehicle and equipment cleaning performed off site. f. Spill prevention and control. g. Other housekeeping SMP acceptable to the enforcing agency (City of Rancho Cucamonga). 3. As the project is proposing to move less than 50 cubic yards of earth, the project is conditioned to provide a precise drainage plan showing the elevation(s) of the new structures, new drainage features, including but not limited to, curbs and v -gutters, drainage pipe, catch basins, along with locations of new pavement, removal and replacement pavement(s), and pavement overlays. Printed: 5/25/2018 4vvvw.Cityo€RC.us Page 11.of 17 E1 -E6 Pg249 Page 675 Project #: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR 111 Archibald Oil Location: Project Type: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Gradin Section Standard Conditions of Approval 4. Prior to approval of the final project -specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project -specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". 5. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the Building Official, or his designee, the civil engineer of record shall file a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Post Construction Storm Water Treatment Devices As -Built Certificate with the Environmental Programs Coordinator, City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Services Department. 6. As the use of drywells are proposed for the structural storm water treatment device, to meet the infiltration requirements of the current Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Systems (MS4) Permit, adequate source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to ,protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration shall be evaluated prior to infiltration and discussed in the final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan document. Printed; 5125/2015 vAvw.cityofRc.us Page 12 of 47 E1—E6 Pg250 Page 676 Project #: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR 111 Archibald Oil Location: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 7. GROUND WATER PROTECTION: Prior to approval of the final project specific water quality management plan (WQMP), the WQMP document shall meet the requirements of the State Water Resources Control Board Order No. R8-2010-0036 (NPDES No. CAS 618036), the San Bernardino County Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Separation (MS4) Permit reads: Section XI.D(Water Quality Management Plan Requirements).8(Groundwater Protection): Treatment Control BMPs utilizing infiltration [exclusive of incidental infiltration and BMPs not designed to primarily function, as infiltration devices (such as grassy swales, detention basins, vegetated buffer strips, constructed wetlands, etc.)] must comply with the following minimum requirements to protect groundwater: a. Use of structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause or contribute to an exceedance of ground water quality objectives. b. Source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration should be evaluated prior to infiltration. c. Adequate pretreatment of runoff prior to infiltration shall be required in gas stations and large commercial parking lots. (NOTE: The State Water Quality Control Board defines a large commercial parking lot as '100,000 sq. ft. or more of commercial development to include parking lot (with 100 or more vehicle traffics), OR, by means of 5,000sgft or more of allowable space designated for parking purposes'). d. Unless adequate pre-treatment of runoff is provided prior to infiltration structural infiltration treatment BMPs must not be used for areas of industrial or light industrial activity{77}, areas subject to high vehicular traffic (25,000 or more daily traffic); car washes; fleet storage areas; nurseries; or any other high threat to water quality land uses or activities. e. Class V injection wells or dry wells must not be placed in areas subject to vehicular{78) repair or maintenance activities{79), such as an auto body repair shop, automotive repair shop, new and used car dealership, specialty repair shop (e.g., transmission and muffler repair shop) or any facility that does any vehicular repair work. f. Structural infiltration SMP treatment shall not be used at sites that are known to have soil and groundwater contamination. g. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall be located at least 100 feet horizontally from any water supply wells. h. The vertical distance from the bottom of any infiltration structural treatment BMP to the historic high groundwater mark shall be at least 10 -feet. Where the groundwater basins do not support beneficial uses, this vertical distance criteria may be reduced, provided groundwater quality is maintained. i. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause a nuisance or pollution as defined in Water Code Section 13050. The final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan shall specifically address items, a., b., c., d., and e., above. tivmv.CityofRC.us Printed: 5125!2018 Page 13 of 17 E1—E6 Pg251 Page 677 Project *: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, ORC2017-00879 Project Name: DR /II Archibald Oil Location: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type. Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 8. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 9. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. All dust control sign (s) shall be located outside of the public right of way. 10. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on-site construction where possible, and shall provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 11. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 12. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout "Information for Grading Plans and Permit". 13. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy or final sign off by the Building Inspector the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) storm water treatment devices and best management practices (BMP). 14. The applicant shall provide a copy of a completed EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) for each underground infiltration device, with the Facility ID Number assigned, to the Building and Safety Services Department Official prior to issuance of the Grading Permit and/or approval of the project -specific Water Quality Management Plan. A copy of EPA Form 7520-16 shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set, and a copy of said form shall be included in the project -specific Water Quality Management Plan. 15. The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the structural storm water treatment devices, commonly referred to as BMPs, to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 16. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code and/or the California Residential Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 17. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 18. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall(s) on property line(s) or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 19. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the grading and drainage plan shall show the maximum parking stall gradient at 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code. Printed; 512 512 01 8 www.CityofRC.us Page 14 of 17 E1—E6 Pg252 Page 678 Project #: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR III Archibald Oil Location-, Project Type: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 20. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100 -feet beyond project boundary. 21. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre -grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre -grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over -excavation; li) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 22. All roof drainage flowing to the public right of way (Arrow Route) must drain under the sidewalk through a parkway culvert approved by the Engineering Department. This shall be shown on both the grading and drainage plan and Engineering Services Department required plans. 23. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the permitted grading plan set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC1804.31CRC R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.2/CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted California Building Code/Residential Code. 24. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the latest adopted California Plumbing Code. Private storm drain improvements shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan. 25. Prior to approval of the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), the WQMP shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 26. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 27. The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for the Class V Injection Wells/underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. Printed: 512512618 www.CitycfRC.us Page 15 of 17 E9—E6 Pg253 Page 679 Project *: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR /// Archibald Oil Location: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 28. The land/property owner shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a biennial basis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. 29. A final project -specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be approved by the Building and Safety Director, or his designee, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit or any building permit. 30. Prior to the start of landscaping operations, the landscape architect and the landscape contractor shall provide a sample of the weed fabric barrier to the Project Planner, City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The weed barrier shall be permeable. 31. The final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP) shall include executed maintenance agreements along with the maintenance guidelines for all proprietary structural storm water treatment devices (BMP's). In the event the applicant cannot get the proprietary device maintenance agreements executed prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant is required to submit a letter to be included within the WQMP document, and scanned and pasted onto the Site and Drainage Plan which states that prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy with applicant shall enter into a contract for the maintenance of the proprietary storm water treatment device. If the proprietary storm water treatment device is part of a residential subdivision, prior to the sale of the residential lot, the developer shall include maintenance agreement(s) as part of the sale of the residential lot to the buyer. A copy of the maintenance agreements to be included in the sale of the property shall be included within the WQMP document. 32. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the project specific water quality management plan all private storm water catch basin inlets shall include insert filters to capture those pollutants of concern as addressed in the in the final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP). At a minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris. All catch basin insert filters shall be maintained on a regular basis as described in the "Inspection and Maintenance Responsibility for Post Construction BMP" section of the final project -specific water quality management plan. 33. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project -Specific Water Quality Management Plan shall include a completed copy of "Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design infiltration Worksheet" located in Appendix D "Section VII -- Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety Recommendations, ..." of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans. The infiltration study shall include the Soil Engineer's recommendations for Appendix D, Table V11.3: Suitability Assessment Related Considerations for Infiltration Facility Safety Factors". 34. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a drainage easement or letter from the downstream property owners accepting concentrated drainage flows. 35. The Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) has been deemed "Acceptable". Prior to the issuance of a grading permit a final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official. Printed: 512512018 wVm.CityafRc.us Page 16 of 17 E1—E6 Pg254 Page 680 Project #: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR 111 Archibald Oil Location: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.- Grading ROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 36. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Pian" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 37. All roof drainage flowing to the public right of way (xx Avenue) must drain under the sidewalk through a parkway culvert approved by the Engineering Department, 38. The applicant shall provide a copy of EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) with the Facility ID Number assigned to the Building and Safety Services Department Official prior to issuance of the Grading Permit. 39. The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for the underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 40. Prior to approval of the project -specific storm water quality management plan, the submit to the Building Official, or his designee, a precise grading plan showing the elevations of existing topographical features, and showing the location and proposed proposed structures and drainage of the site. applicant shall location and elevations of Printed: 512512018 wanv.CltyofRC.uS Page 17 of 17 E1 --E6 Pg255 Page 681 RESOLUTION NO. 18-41 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VARIANCE NO. DRC2016-00831, A REQUEST TO REDUCE THE PARKING SETBACK FROM 10 FEET TO 5 FEET -6 INCHES FOR THE PROPOSED REQUEST TO ESTABLISH RETAIL SALES IN AN EXISTING 1,728 SQUARE FOOT VACANT SERVICE STATION BUILDING, RE- ESTABLISH AN EXISTING 1,481 SQUARE FOOT CANOPY WITH 4 FUEL PUMPS, AND INSTALL A 968 SQUARE FOOT CAR WASH ON A 29,456 SQUARE FOOT (0.676 ACRE) PARCEL IN THE LOW MEDIUM (LM) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (PROPOSED GENERAL COMMERCIAL (GC) DISTRICT) AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND ARROW ROUTE, LOCATED AT 8477 ARCHIBALD AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -- APN: 0208-291-05. A. Recitals. 1. Archibald Oil filed an application for the issuance of Variance No. DRC2016-00831 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Variance request is referred to as "the application." 2. On June 13, 2018, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and continued the application to the June 27, 2018 Planning Commission meeting. 3. On June 27, 2018, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and continued the application to the July 11, 2018 Planning Commission meeting. 4. On July 11, 2018, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 5. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing on July 11, 2018, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route with a street frontage of approximately 170 feet along Archibald Avenue E1—F6 Pg256 Page 682 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-41 VAR DRC2016-00831 July 11, 2418 Page 2 and a street frontage of approximately 175 feet along Arrow Route and is presently improved with a vacant service station building and a fuel canopy with 4 fuel pumps; and b. The property to the north of the subject site is designated Low Medium Residential and is improved with the Mulberry Early Education Center. To the west is Archibald Avenue and beyond that'the property is designated Office and is vacant. The property to the east is designated Low Medium Residential and contains a single-family house. To the south is Arrow Route and beyond that the property is designated General Commercial and is improved with a commercial center; and C. The application proposes to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re-establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 -square foot car wash on a 29,456 -square foot (0.676 acre) parcel; and d. The application proposes to reduce the parking setback from 10 feet to 5 feet - 6 inches along the north property line associated with the request to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re-establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968-squ2re foot car wash on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel; and e. The project site is located in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (a proposed General Commercial (GC) District and has been designed to comply with the all applicable design standards, except for the number of parking spaces and the minimum parking setback, which are addressed in the corresponding Variance and Minor Exception applications; and f. Eight parking spaces are required for this project; however, due to site constraints, the project site provides 7 parking spaces. The applicant has submitted a request for Minor Exception DRC2017-00879 to allow for a reduction in the required parking by one stall (or 12.5 percent); and g. The project will retain the existing driveway at the northwest corner of the site, close the existing driveway at the southwest corner of the site, and relocate the existing driveway at the southeast corner of the site to a new shared driveway for the project site and the vacant property to the east; both driveways will be provided with decorative paving. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulations would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the Development Code. Commercial development standards establish landscaped setbacks to separate and buffer between adjacent land uses. The proposed setback reduction is necessary due to design constraints between the existing service station use and the proposed carwash and how this facility relates to adjacent properties. Specifically, the service station building is located in the center of the project site and the fuel pump canopy is located between the service station building and the Archibald Avenue street frontage. The addition of the carwash building adjacent to the service station, the addition of perimeter landscaping, and 7 additional E1 --E6 Pg257 Page 683 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-41 VAR DRC2016-00831 July 11, 2018 Page 3 parking spaces does makes enforcement of the development standard inconsistent with the objectives of the Development Code as 4 of the proposed parking spaces had to shift northerly to provide sufficient room for on-site circulation around the north side of the service station building; and b. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same district. The existing project site is developed with the service station building, fuel canopy, street adjacent landscaping, minimal interior landscaping, and property line adjacent asphalt paving. Proposed improvements to reuse the service station building and fuel canopy, modify existing driveway access, install delineated parking spaces, and property line adjacent landscaping will significantly improve the appearance of a non -conforming site. Although the proposed parking is located 5.5 feet away from the property line, vehicles on- site were previously able to park property line adjacent. Proposed project improvements will allow for the addition of a landscaped buffer between existing land uses to the north and proposed improvements on-site; and C. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district. The setback reduction allows landscaping and parking to be distributed throughout the entire project site. There are numerous properties within the General Commercial (GC) District developed under either County standards prior to incorporation, or to City standards that permitted parking either at a 5 -foot minimum setback, or immediately adjacent to the property line. The strict enforcement of the required setback would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the same General Commercial (GC) District; and d. That the granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district. The project site is located in a proposed General Commercial (GC) District, which was designed to accommodate a variety of land uses. There are numerous properties within the General Commercial (GC) District developed under either County standards prior to incorporation, or to City standards that permitted parking either at a 5 -foot minimum setback, or immediately adjacent to the property line. The approval of this variance application will not constitute,a grant of special privilege as other properties in the same General Commercial (GC) District enjoy the property right requested; and e. That the granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The requested reduction in the parking setback will not negatively impact the adjacent property owners. The existing Mulberry Early Education Center is situated approximately 160 feet north of their south property line, with parking and landscaping located between their facility and their south property line. Due to the existing building separation, the proposed setback reduction will not negatively impact properties or improvements in the vicinity. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment recommends the City Council adopt a E1—E6 Pg258 Page 684 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-41 VAR DRC2016-00831 July 11, 2018 Page 4 Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. (1) A comment letter was received from the Burrtec Waste Industries, dated May 18, 2018, in response to the circulated ISIMND. Burrtec's comment addressed AB 341 and AB 1826, which requires that commercial businesses generating more than 4 cubic yards of waste per week participate in a commercial waste recycling program, and that businesses that sell food must also participate in. a food waste recycling program. The project will require at least a 3 -cubic yard bin each for waste and mixed recyclables and should also make provisions for an additional bin for food waste. Conditions of approval require the applicant to provide adequate trash bins for waste, recyclables, and food waste. (ii) A comment letter was received from the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DISC), dated May 23, 2018, in response to the circulated ISIMND. The DTSC's comments questioned whether any historic uses at the project site may have resulted in any release of hazardous waste/substances, if a Phase 1 Environmental Assessment had been prepared, if there are any PCB 1containing transformers on-site, whether underground storage tanks were used at the site, and if there is soil contamination or groundwater contamination on-site. A Phase 1 Environmental Assessment has not been prepared, the applicant indicated that there are none, and have never been, any PCB containing transformers on the project site, the underground storage tanks were previously removed, and provided a Remedial Action Completion Certificate, dated November 5, 2001. The Remedial Action Completion Certificate was issued by the County of San Bernardino Fire Department, Office of the Fire Marshall, Hazardous Materials Division for the project site indicating that no further remedial action is required. On June 13, 2018, the DTSC indicated that they have reviewed the applicant's response and had no further comments. (iii) A comment letter was received from the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), dated May 29, 2018, in response to the circulated ISIMND. The SCAQMD's comments identified that since a permit is required by the SCAQMD they should be identified as a Responsible Agency on the MND and that the Final MND should demonstrate compliance with SCAQMD Rules. The SCAQMD indicated that the Air Quality analysis did not include operational ROG emissions generated from storage tanks or from the fueling process and recommended that a Health Risk Assessment analysis be prepared. The E1 --E6 Pg259 Page 685 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-41 VAR DRC2016-00831 July 11, 2018 Page 5 SQAQMD recommended a modification to the Air Quality Mitigation Measure, Short Term (Construction) Emissions from a Tier 3 to a Tier 4. Finally, the SCAQMD recommended utilizing the current CaIEEMod (Version 2016.3.2) in the air quality analysis. On June 6, 2018, the applicant's consultant (MD Acoustics) responded to SCAQMD comments. That response 1) recognized compliance with AQMD Rules 201, 203, and 461; 2) analyzed operational ROG emissions generated from the storage tanks and from the fueling process and found them to be below the daily VOC threshold; 3) identified that the project is below a threshold that would require a Health Risk Assessment; 4) analyzed and acknowledged the distance to sensitive receptors; 5) addressed compliance with CARB Tier 3; and 6) acknowledged that "revising the construction and operational emissions calculations is not expected to change the less than significant findings in the MND." On June 21, 2018, the SCAQMD concurred with the applicant's response and had no further comments; and b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds; (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission therefore recommends the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration; and C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore recommends the City Council adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project; and d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the City Council's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and. every condition set forth below. Planning Department 1) The approval of Variance DRC2016-00831 is contingent upon City Council approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684. E1—E6 Pg260 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-41 VAR DRC2016-00831 July 11, 2018 Page 6 2) All conditions of approval as contained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 18-39 for Design Review DRC2015-00682 shall apply. 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF JULY 2018, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA M. ATTEST: Francisco Oaxaca, Chairman Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of July 2018, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: E1—E6 Pg261 Page 687 Conditions of Approval Community Development Department Project #: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name Location: Project Type: DR 111 Archibald Oil 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Approval is for a request to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re-establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 square foot car wash on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue. 2. The proposed signage/architectural treatment on the fuel canopy roof shall be removed and the existing terra cotta tiles shall remain. 3. The applicant shall comply with AB 341 and AB 1826, which require that commercial businesses generating more than four cubic yards of waste per week participate in a commercial waste recycling program, and that businesses that sell food must also participate in a food waste recycling program. The project will require at least a three cubic yard bin each for waste and mixed recyclables and shall also make provisions for an additional bin for food waste. Standard Conditions of Approval 4. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet. 5. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 17 feet long with a required 1 -foot overhang (e.g., over a curb stop). 6. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. 7. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/plazas/ recreational uses. 8. Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours. 9. The lighting fixture design shall compliment the architectural program. It shall include the plaza area lighting fixtures, building lighting fixtures (exterior), and parking lot lighting fixtures. 10. The Master Plan is approved in concept only. Future development for (each building pad/parcel) shall be subject to a separate Development/Design Review process. 11. Signs shall be conveniently posted for "no overnight parking" and for "employee parking only." Print -ad - 5!2512018 wway.CityofRC.us E1—E6 Pg262 Page 688 Project#: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: Location: Project Type: DR 111 Archibald Oil 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 12. All operations and businesses shall be conducted to comply with the following standards which shall be incorporated into the lease agreements for all tenants: a. Noise Level - All commercial activities shall not create any noise that would exceed an exterior noise level ,of 65 dB during the hours of 10 p.m. until 7 a.m. and 70 dB during the hours of 7 a.m. until 10 p.m. b. Loading and Unloading - No person shall cause the loading, unloading, opening, closing, or other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials, garbage cans, or other similar objects between the hours of 10 p.m, and 7 a.m. unless otherwise specified herein, in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to a residential area. 13. Any outdoor vending machines shall be recessed into the building faces and shall not extend into the pedestrian walkways. The design details shall be reviewed and approved by the ' Planning Department prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 14. Textured pavement shall be provided across circulation aisle, pedestrian walkway, and plaza. They shall be of brick/tile pavers, exposed aggregate, integral color concrete, or any combination thereof. Full samples shall be submitted for Planning Department review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 15. Trash collection shall occur between the hours of 7:00 am and 7:00 pm only. 16. Provide for the following design features in each trash enclosure, to the satisfaction of the Planning Department: a. Architecturally integrated into the design of (the shopping center/the project). b. Separate pedestrian access that does not require the opening of the main doors and to include self-closing pedestrian doors. c. Large enough to accommodate two trash bins. d. Roll -up doors. e. Trash bins with counter -weighted lids. f. Architecturally treated overhead shade trellis. g. Chain link screen on top to prevent trash from blowing out of the enclosure and designed to be hidden from view. 17. The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and in no event shall trash and debris remain for more than 24 hours. 18. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs. 19. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for Planning Department and Engineering Services Department approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. Printed: 612512018 www.CityofRC.us Page 2 of 17 E1 --E6 Pg263 Page 689 Project 4: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR /// Archibald Oil Location: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 20. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and Development Code regulations. 21. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Department review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 22. A minimum of 20 percent of trees planted within industrial projects, and a minimum of 30 percent within commercial and office projects, shall be specimen size trees - 24 -inch box or larger. 23. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15 -gallon tree for every three parking stalls. 24. All ground -mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Department. 25. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building. 26. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water efficient landscaping per Development Code Chapter 17.82. 27. For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll -up doors and service doors to match main building colors. 28. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections shall be screened from all sides and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department. Such screening 'shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. Any roof -mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically more than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet, shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent nature with the building design and is detailed consistent with the building. Any roof -mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically less than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet shall be painted consistent with the color scheme of the building. Details shall be included in building plans. 29. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole - expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. Printed: 512512018 www.CityoiRC.us page 3 of 17 E1 -E6 Pg 264 Page 690 Project #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 DR Ill Archibald Oil 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: PEanning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 30. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 31. For multi -family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. 32. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of ,Exemption and Mitigated Negative Declaration fee in the amount of $2,330.75. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing. 33. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 34. Any modification or intensification of the approved use, including revisions in the operations of the business including changes to the operating days/hours; change in the location on-site or within the building of the use/activity that is approved by this Conditional Use Permit; improvements including new building construction; and/or other modifications/intensification beyond what is specifically approved by this Conditional Use Permit, shall require the review and approval by the Planning Director prior to submittal of documents for plan check/occupancy, construction, commencement of the activity, and/or issuance of a business license. The Planning Director may determine that modifications or intensifications of use require the submittal of an application to modify this Conditional Use Permit for review by the City. 35. Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in accordance with the Development Code Section 17.80.050, and so noted on the grading plans. The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans. 36. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 37. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls,' landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any .parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Services Department. 38. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. Printed: 5/25/2618 www.C=yornC.us Page 4 of 17 E1—E6 Pg265 Page 691 Project #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 DR 111 Archibald Oil 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.- Planning- ROJECT: Plannin Department Standard Conditions of Approval 39. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 40. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director and Police Department (909-477-2800) prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 41. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Services Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance and final acceptance granted prior to occupancy. 42. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 43. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 44. Revised Site Plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 45. Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock. Other stone veneers may be manufactured products. 46. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, and the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 47. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes. Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions Printed: 512512018 www.CityofRC.us Page 5 cf 17 E1 --E6 Pg266 Page 692 Project #: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR 111 Archibald Oil Location: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Enqineerinq Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Archibald Avenue frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Major Arterial" standards as required and including: a. Curb adjacent sidewalk may remain, repair damaged sidewalk as required. b. Remove the most southerly drive approach on Archibald Avenue and replace with curb and gutter. c. A total of 50 feet on Archibald Avenue, measured from the street centerline, shall be dedicated to the City. d. Relocate existing traffic signal equipment. e. Drive approach shall be a minimum width of 35 feet per City Standard Pian 101, Type C. 2. The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) on the project side of Archibald Avenue shall be undergrounded to the first pole offsite north of the north project boundary and to the first pole offsite south of Arrow Route, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever comes first. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development (redevelopment) as it occurs on the opposite side of the street. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public improvement being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. 3. Arrow Route frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Major Arterial" standards as required and including: a. Provide right-of-way dedication and construct right turn lane per City Standard Plan 119. b. Relocate existing traffic signal equipment. c. Relocate the existing street light, as it is located at the proposed driveway. d. Drive approach shall be a minimum width of 35 feet per City Standard Plan 101, Type C. e. Provide a signing and striping plan. Printed: 5!2512018 www.CityofRC.us Page 6 of 17 E1—E6 Pg267 Page 693 Project#: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR /// Archibald Oil Location: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.- Engineering ROJECT.Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 4. The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) on the project side of Arrow Route shall be undergrounded to the first pole offsite east of the east project boundary to the first pole offsite west of Archibald Avenue, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever comes first. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development (redevelopment) as it occurs on the opposite side of the street. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public improvement being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. 5. Reconstruct access ramp at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route to comply with current ADA requirements. A detail will have to be added to the street improvement plan showing the design details, elevations, and grades of the access ramp to substantiate they comply with ADA requirements. Design shall be completed and improvements secured for prior to issuance of Building permit. The reconstruction along with all public improvements shall be completed prior to occupancy. 6. Provide an easement along the easterly portion of the 8477 Archibald Avenue, APN 0208-291-05 for the benefit of the parcel to the east, APN 0208-291-06 for ingress and egress prior to building permit issuance. When the parcel to the east develops they will be required to provide an easement along the westerly portion of their property for ingress and egress, for a shared driveway. If the parcel to the east APN 0208-291-06 will allow the easement along the westerly portion of their property, concurrently with the development of 8477 Archibald Avenue, APN 0208-291-05, the driveway may be centered between the two properties. Standard Conditions of Approval 7. Corner property line cutoff shall be dedicated per City Standards. 8. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shail be borne by the developer. 9. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Permits issued on or after June 2, 2014, must complete the reimbursement process through the City's Accelerate online portal within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project or the deposit will be forfeited. Permits issued before June 2, 2014, require the following when applying for a deposit reimbursement: a completed CD -2 form, a copy of the cashier's receipt showing the deposit amount, and all weight tickets. Instructions and forms are available at the City's web site, www.CityofRC.us, under City Hall; Engineering; Environmental Programs. Printed: 5/25/2018 www.CityofRC.us Page 7 of 17 E1—E6 Pg268 Page 694 Project # Project Name Location: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 DR 111 Archibald Oil 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 10. Add the following note to any private landscape plans that show street trees: "All improvements within the public right-of-way, including street trees, shall be installed per the public improvement plans." If there is a discrepancy between the public and private plans, the street improvement plans will govern. 11. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 12. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 13. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. Printed: 5/2512018 %vvAv,CityofRC.us Page 8 of 17 E1—E6 Pg269 Page 695 Project #: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR 111 Archibald Oil Location: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 14. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer, 2) Conduit shall be 3 -inch pvc with pull rope or as specified. e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per latest ADA standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. 15. Street trees, a minimum of 15 -gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. Fire Prevention 1 New Construction Unit Standard Conditions of Approval 1. New canopy shall not reduce the clearance of the approved, submit tank and fuel dispensing plans Hazardous Materials Division. Subsequent to their Safety for building permit issuance. Canopy, store, of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department. Building and Safety Services Department existing canopy. When the entitlement process is to the San Bernardino County Fire Department, approval, bring approval letter to Building and and carwash plans shall be submitted to the City wvmCity0RC.us Pri Hied: 5125!2018 page 9 of 17 E1—E6 Pg270 Page 696 Project #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 DR III Archibald Oil 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Building and Safety Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. When the Design Review is approved submit complete construction drawings including structural calculations to Building and Safety for plan review in accordance with the current edition of the CA Building and Fire Codes. A soils report is required for new structures. All disabled access to the site and building must be provided in accordance to current regulations at the time of plan check submittal. New trash enclosure roof structure must be of fire retardant lumber or non-combustible materials. Classify existing canopy as an S-1 occupancy. Installation of underground fuel tanks and dispensing fuel pumps require review and plan check approval from San Bernardino County Fire Department, Hazardous Materials Division. CVWD - Provide a plumbing plan submittal to the local water purveyor. Building and Safety will not issue building permits until a plumbing first release is obtained by the applicant from CVWD. New area lights shall be minimum 14'-6" clear above the drive aisle, where lights overhang the drive aisle. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 1. NONRESIDENTIAL MANDATORY MEASURES — CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE — Prior to the issuance of any building permit the applicant shall comply with Section 5.106.10 (Grading and paving) of the current adopted California Green Building, Standards Code: Construction plans shall indicate how site grading or a drainage system will manage all surface water flows to keep water from entering buildings. Examples of methods to manage surface water include, but are not limited to, the following: 1. Swales. 2. Water collection and disposal systems. 3. French drains. 4. Water retention gardens. 5. Other water measures which keep surface water away from buildings and aid in groundwater recharge. Exception: Additions and alterations not altering the drainage path. Printed; 5/2512018 VAvw:CityofRC.us Page 10 of 17 EI—E6 Pg271 Page 697 Project 4: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831; DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR 111 Archibald Oil Location: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 2. NONRESIDENTIAL MANDATORY MEASURES — CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE — Prior to the issuance of any building permit the applicant shall comply. with Section 5.106.1 (Storm water pollution prevention) of the current adopted California Green Building Standards Code: Newly construction projects and additions which disturb less than one acre of land shall prevent the pollution of stormwater runoff from the construction activities through one or more of the following measures: 1.106.1.1 Local Ordinance -- Comply with a lawfully enacted stormwater management and/or erosion control ordinance. 1.106.1.2 Best Management Practices (BMP) — Prevent the loss of soil through wind or water erosion by implementing an effective combination of erosion and sediment control and good housekeeping BMP. 1. Soil loss BMP that should be considered for implementation as appropriate for each project include, but are not limited to, the following: a. Scheduling construction activity. b. Preservation of natural features, vegetation and soil. c. Drainage swales or lined ditches to control stormwater flow. d. Mulching or hydroseeding to stabilize disturbed soils. e. Erosion control to protect slopes. f. Protection of storm drain inlets (gravel bags or catch basin inserts). g. Perimeter sediment control (perimeter silt fence, fiber rolls). h. Sediment trap or sediment basin to retain sediment on site. i. Stabilized construction exits. j. Wind erosion control. k. Other soil loss BMP acceptable to the enforcing agency. 2. Good housekeeping BMP to manage construction equipment, materials and wastes that should be considered for implementation as appropriate for each project include, but are not limited to, the following: a. Material handling and waste management. b. Building materials stockpile management. c. Management of washout areas (concrete, paints, stucco, etc.). d. Control of vehicle/equipment fueling to contractors staging area. e. Vehicle and equipment cleaning performed off site. f. Spill prevention and control. g. Other housekeeping BMP acceptable to the enforcing agency (City of Rancho Cucamonga). 3. As the project is proposing to move less than 50 cubic yards of earth, the project is conditioned to provide a precise drainage plan showing the elevation(s) of the new structures, new drainage features, including but not limited to, curbs and v -gutters, drainage pipe, catch basins, along with locations of new pavement, removal and replacement pavement(s), and pavement overlays. Printed: 512512018 wSwt.CityofRC.us page 11 of 17 E1—E6 Pg272 Page 698 Project ## Project Name Location: Project Type: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 DR 111 Archibald Oil 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.- Grqding Section Standard Conditions of Approval 4. Prior to approval of the final project -specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project -specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". 5. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the Building Official, or his designee, the civil engineer of record shall file a Water Quality Management Pian (WQMP) Post Construction Storm Water Treatment Devices As -Built Certificate with the Environmental Programs Coordinator, City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Services Department.' 6. As the use of drywells are proposed for the structural storm water treatment device, to meet the infiltration requirements of the current Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Systems (MS4) Permit, adequate source control and pollution prevention control, BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration shall be evaluated prior to infiltration and discussed in the final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan document. Printed: 5/2512018 www.CityofRC.us Page 12 of 17 EI --E6 Pg273 Page 699 Project #: Project Name Location: Project Type: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 DR !1/ Archibald Oil 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 7. GROUND WATER PROTECTION: Prior to approval of the final project specific water quality management plan (WQMP), the WQMP document shall meet the requirements of the State Water Resources Control Board Order No. R8-2010-0036 (NPD>S No. CAS 618036), the San Bernardino County Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Separation (MS4) Permit reads: Section XI.D(Water Quality Management Plan Requirements).8(Groundwater Protection): Treatment Control BMPs utilizing infiltration [exclusive of incidental infiltration and BMPs not designed to primarily function as infiltration devices (such as grassy swales, detention basins, Vegetated buffer strips, constructed wetlands, etc.)] must comply with the following minimum requirements to protect groundwater: a. Use of structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause or contribute to an exceedance of ground water quality objectives. b. Source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration should be evaluated prior to infiltration. c. Adequate pretreatment of runoff prior to infiltration shall be required in gas stations and large commercial parking lots. (NOTE: The State Water Quality Control Board defines a large commercial parking lot as `100,000 sq. ft. or more of commercial development to include parking lot (with 100 or more vehicle traffics), OR, by means of 5,000sgft or more of allowable space designated for parking purposes'). d. Unless adequate pre-treatment of runoff is provided prior to infiltration structural infiltration treatment BMPs must not be used for areas of industrial or light industrial activity{77}, areas subject to high vehicular traffic (25,000 or more daily traffic); car washes; fleet storage areas; nurseries; or any other high threat to water quality land uses or activities. e. Class V injection wells or dry wells must not be placed in areas subject to vehicular{78} repair or maintenance activities{79}, such as an auto body repair shop, automotive repair shop, new and used car dealership, specialty repair shop (e.g., transmission and muffler repair shop) or any facility that does any vehicular repair work. f. Structural infiltration BMP treatment shall not be used at sites that are known to have soil and groundwater contamination. g. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall be located at least 100 feet horizontally from any water supply wells. h. The vertical distance from the bottom of any infiltration structural treatment BMP to the historic high groundwater mark shall be at least 10 -feet. Where the groundwater basins do not support beneficial uses, this vertical distance criteria may be reduced, provided groundwater quality is maintained. i. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause a nuisance or pollution as defined in Water Code Section 13050. The final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan shall specifically address items, a., b., c., d., and e., above. Printed: 512612018 v,%wi.CityofRC.us Page 13 of 17 E1—E6 Pg274 Page 700 Project #: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR 111 Archibald Oil Location: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 8. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 9. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. All dust control sign (s) shall be located outside of the public right of way. 10. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on-site construction where possible, and shall provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 11. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 12. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout "Information for Grading Plans and Permit". 13. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy or final sign off by the Building Inspector the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) storm water treatment devices and best management practices (BMP). 14. The applicant shall provide a copy of a completed EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of injection Wells) for each underground infiltration device, with the Facility ID Number assigned, to the Building and Safety Services Department Official prior to issuance of the Grading Permit and/or approval of the project -specific Water Quality Management Plan. A copy of EPA Form 7520-16 shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set, and a copy of said form shall be included in the project -specific Water Quality Management. Plan. 15. The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the structural storm water treatment devices, commonly referred to as BMPs, to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 16. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code and/or the California Residential Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 17. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 18. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall(s) on property perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 19. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the grading and parking stall gradient at 5 percent. Accessibility parking current adopted California Building Code. shall obtain written permission from the line(s) or provide a detail(s) showing the drainage plan shall show the maximum stall grades shall be constructed per the, Printed: 5/25/2018 aAwt.CityofRC.us Page 14 of 17 E1 -E6 Pg275 Page 701 Project #: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR 111 Archibald Oil Location: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 20. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100 -feet beyond project boundary. 21. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre -grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project own erlrepresentative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre -grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over -excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 22. All roof drainage flowing to the public right of way (Arrow Route) must drain under the sidewalk through a parkway culvert approved by the Engineering Department. This shall be shown on both the grading and drainage plan and Engineering Services Department required plans. 23. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the permitted grading plan set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC 1804.3/CRC R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.21CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.21CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted California Building Code/Residential Code, 24. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the latest adopted California Plumbing Code. Private storm drain improvements shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan. 25. Prior to approval of the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), the WQMP shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 26. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 27. The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for the Class V Injection Wellslunderground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 4VNM1.CityofRC.t15 Printed: 5!25!2018 Page 15 of 17 E1—E6 Pg276 Page 702 Project #: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR 111 Archibald Oil Location: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 28. The land/property owner shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a biennial basis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. 29. A final project -specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be approved by the Building and Safety Director, or his designee, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be recorded, prior to the issuance of a grading permit or any building permit. 30. Prior to the start of landscaping operations, the landscape architect and the landscape contractor shall provide a sample of the weed fabric barrier to the Project Planner, City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The weed barrier shall be permeable. 31. The final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP) shall include executed maintenance agreements along with the maintenance guidelines for all proprietary structural storm water treatment devices (BMP's). In the event the applicant cannot get the proprietary device maintenance agreements executed prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant is required to submit a letter to be included within the WQMP document, and scanned and pasted onto the Site and Drainage Plan which states that prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy with applicant shall enter into a contract for the maintenance of the proprietary storm water treatment device. if the proprietary storm water treatment device is part of a residential subdivision, prior to the sale of the residential lot, the developer shall include maintenance agreement(s) as part of the sale of the residential lot to the buyer. A copy of the maintenance agreements to be included in the sale of the property shall be included within the WQMP document. 32. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the project specific water quality management plan all private storm water catch basin inlets shall include insert filters to capture those pollutants of concern as addressed in the in the final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP). At a minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris. All catch basin insert filters shall be maintained on a regular basis as described in the "Inspection and Maintenance Responsibility for Post Construction BMP" section of the final project -specific water quality management plan. 33. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project -Specific Water Quality Management Plan shall include a completed copy of "Worksheet H. Factor of Safety and Design infiltration Worksheet" located in Appendix D "Section VII — Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety Recommendations, ..." of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans. The infiltration study shall include the Soil Engineer's recommendations for Appendix D, Table VI1:3: Suitability Assessment Related Considerations for Infiltration Facility Safety Factors". 34. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a drainage easement or letter from the downstream property owners accepting concentrated drainage flows. 35. The Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) has been deemed "Acceptable". Prior to the issuance of a grading permit a final project -specific Water Quality Management Pian shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official. vwwt.CityofRC.us Primed: 512512018 Page 16 of 17 E1 --E6 Pg277 Page 703 Project #: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00839 , DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR 111 Archibald Oil Location: Project Type 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 36. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Pian" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 37. All roof drainage flowing to the public right of way (xx Avenue) must drain under the sidewalk through a parkway culvert approved by the Engineering Department. 38. The applicant shall provide a copy of EPA Form 7520-16 (inventory of Injection Wells) with the Facility ID Number assigned to the Building and Safety Services Department Official prior to issuance of the Grading Permit. 39. The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for the underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 40. Prior to approval of the project -specific storm water quality management plan, the applicant shall submit to the Building Official, or his designee, a precise grading. plan showing the location and elevations of existing topographical features, and showing the location and proposed elevations of proposed structures and drainage of the site. Printed: 5/2512018 %vww.CityofRC.us Page 17 of 17 E1—E6 Pg278 Page 704 RESOLUTION NO. 18-42 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MINOR EXCEPTION NO. DRC2017-00879, A REQUEST TO REDUCE ON-SITE PARKING BY 12.5% FOR THE PROPOSED REQUEST TO ESTABLISH RETAIL SALES IN AN EXISTING 1,728 SQUARE FOOT VACANT SERVICE STATION BUILDING, RE-ESTABLISH AN EXISTING 1,481 SQUARE FOOT CANOPY WITH 4 FUEL PUMPS, AND INSTALL A 968 SQUARE FOOT CAR WASH ON A 29,456 SQUARE FOOT (0.676 ACRE) PARCEL IN THE LOW MEDIUM (LM) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (PROPOSED GENERAL COMMERCIAL (GC) DISTRICT) AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND ARROW ROUTE, LOCATED AT 8477 ARCHIBALD AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0208-291-05. A. Recitals. 1. Archibald Oil filed an application for the issuance of Minor Exception No. DRC2017- 00879 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Variance request is referred to as "the application." 2. On June 13, 2018, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and continued the application to the June 27, 2018 Planning Commission meeting. 3. On June 27, 2018, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and continued the application to the July 11, 2018 Planning Commission meeting. 4. On July 11, 2018, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing on July 11, 2018, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route with a street frontage of approximately 170 feet along Archibald Avenue E1 --E6 Pg279 Page 705 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-42 ME DRC2017-00879 -- ARCHIBALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 2 and a street frontage of approximately 175 feet along Arrow Route and is presently improved with a vacant service station building and a fuel canopy with 4 fuel pumps; and b. The property to the north of the subject site is designated Low Medium Residential and is improved with the Mulberry Early Education Center. To the west is Archibald Avenue and beyond that the property is designated Office and is vacant. The property to the east is designated Low Medium Residential and contains a single-family house. To the south is Arrow Route and beyond that the property is designated General Commercial and is improved with a commercial center; and C. The application proposes to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re-establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 -square foot car wash on a 29,456 -square foot (0.676 acre) parcel; and d. The application proposes to reduce the total on-site parking by 1 parking space, a proposed 12.5 percent reduction in the on-site parking requirement associated with a request to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re- establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 -square foot car wash on a 29,456 -square foot (0.676 acre) parcel; and e. The project site is located in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (a proposed General Commercial (GC) District and has been designed to comply with the all applicable design standards, except for the number of parking spaces and the minimum parking setback, which are addressed in the corresponding Variance and Minor Exception applications; and The project site provides 7 parking spaces; and g. The project will retain the existing driveway at the northwest corner of the site, close the existing driveway at the southwest corner of the site, and relocate the existing driveway at the southeast corner of the site to a new shared driveway for the project site and the vacant property to the east; both driveways will be provided with decorative paving. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the Minor Exception is consistent with the General Plan or any applicable specific plan or Development Agreement. The proposed reduction in the required number of parking spaces is consistent with the General Plan, which has stated policies to designate appropriate land uses to support local community needs (LU -1.2) and to support development complementary infill development, rehabilitation, and reuse that contribute positively to the surrounding residential neighborhood areas (Policy LU -2.4). The proposed parking reduction is necessary due to design constraints between the existing service station use and the proposed carwash.; and b. That the proposed development is compatible with existing and proposed land uses in the surrounding area. The proposed project is compatible with the surrounding land uses as the project site is within the existing Low Medium (LM) Residential District and proposed General Commercial (GC) District, which will permit the re-establishment of the service station E1—E6 Pg280 Page 706 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-42 ME DRC2017-00879 — ARCHIBALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 3 land use. The proposed project will rehabilitate and reuse an existing service station building that has been closed since 2002 and the redesign and reuse of a project site that will contribute positively to the surrounding area; and C. That the proposed exception to the specific development standard(s) is necessary to allow creative design solutions compatible with the desires of the community and/or to accommodate unique site conditions. The proposed parking reduction is necessary due to design constraints between the existing service station use and the proposed carwash. Specifically, the service station building is located in the center of the project site and the fuel pump canopy is located between the service station building and the Archibald Avenue street frontage. The addition of the carwash building adjacent to the service station, the addition of perimeter landscaping, and the addition of 7 other parking spaces does not provide the opportunity to add any additional parking; and d. That the granting of the Minor Exception will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district, and will not be detrimental to public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious properties or improvements in the vicinity. The proposed reduction in the required number of parking spaces is not a grant of special privilege in that the Development Code allows flexibility to reduce the required number of parking spaces where the applicant has demonstrated that the project will provide adequate parking for all on-site uses. Operation and use of the fuel pumps does not require customers patronizing the project site to enter the service station building as fuel can be purchased directly at the fuel pump. Operation and use of the carwash facility is automated and a carwash can be purchased directly at the carwash facility. There is sufficient parking on-site to support the patronage of the service station food store. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends the City Council adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. (i) A comment letter was received from the Burrtec Waste Industries, dated May 18, 2018, in response to the circulated IS/MND. Burrtec's comment addressed AB 341 and AB 1826, which requires that commercial businesses generating more than 4 cubic yards of waste per week participate in a commercial waste recycling program, and that businesses that sell food must also participate in a food waste recycling program. The project will require at least a 3 -cubic yard bin each for waste and mixed recyclables and should also make provisions for an additional bin for food E1 --E6 Pg281 Page 707 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-42 ME DRC2017-00879—ARCHIBALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 4 waste. Conditions of approval require the applicant to provide adequate trash bins for waste, recyclables, and food waste. (ii) A comment letter was received from the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), dated May 23, 2018, in response to the circulated IS/MND. The DTSC's comments questioned whether any historic uses at the project site may have resulted in any release of hazardous waste/substances, if a. Phase 1 Environmental Assessment had been prepared, if there are any PCB containing transformers on-site, whether underground storage tanks were used at the site, and if there is soil contamination or groundwater contamination on-site. A Phase 1 Environmental Assessment has not been prepared, the applicant indicated that there are none, and have never been, any PCB containing transformers on the project site, the underground storage tanks were previously removed, and provided a Remedial Action Completion Certificate, dated November 5, 2001. The Remedial Action Completion Certificate was issued by the County of San Bernardino Fire Department, Office of the Fire Marshall, Hazardous Materials Division for the project site indicating that no further remedial action is required. On June 13, 2018, the DTSC indicated that they have reviewed the applicant's response and had no further comments. (iii) A comment letter was received from the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), dated May 29, 2018, in response to the circulated IS/MND. The SCAQMD's comments identified that since a permit is required by the SCAQMD they should be identified as a Responsible Agency on the MND and that the Final MND should demonstrate compliance with SCAQMD Rules. The SCAQMD indicated that the Air Quality analysis did not include operational ROG emissions generated from storage tanks or from the fueling process and recommended that a Health Risk Assessment analysis be prepared. The SQAQMD recommended a modification to the Air Quality Mitigation Measure, Short Term (Construction) Emissions from a Tier 3 to a Tier 4. Finally, the SCAQMD recommended utilizing the current. CaIEEMod (Version 2016.3.2) in the air quality analysis. On June 6, 2018, the applicant's consultant (MD Acoustics) responded to SCAQMD comments. That response 1) recognized compliance with AQMD Rules 201, 203, and 461; 2) analyzed operational ROG emissions generated from the storage tanks and from the fueling process and found them to be below the daily VOC threshold; 3) identified that the project is below a threshold that would require a Health Risk Assessment; 4) analyzed and acknowledged the distance to sensitive receptors; 5) addressed compliance with CARB Tier 3; and 6) acknowledged that "revising the construction and operational emissions calculations is not expected to change the less than significant findings in the MND." On June 21, 2018, the SCAQMD concurred with the applicant's response and had no further comments; and b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial E1—E6 Pg282 Page 708 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-42 ME DRC2017-00879— ARCH IBALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 5 evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission therefore recommends the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration; and C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore recommends the City Council adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project; and d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the City Council's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below. Planning Department 1) The approval of Minor Exception DRC2017-00879 is contingent upon City Council approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684. 2) All conditions of approval as contained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 18-39, for Design Review DRC2015-00682 shall apply. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF JULY 2018. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: ATTEST: Francisco Oaxaca, Chairman Candyce Burnett, Secretary E1—E6 Pg283 Page 709 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO, 18-42 ME DRC2017-00879 — ARCHIBALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 6 I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of July 2018, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: E1—E6 Pg284 Page 710 Project # Project Name Location: Project Type: Conditions of Approval Community Development Department DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 DR 111 Archibald Oil 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT, Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Approval is for a request to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re-establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 square foot car wash on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue. 2. The proposed signage/architectural treatment on the fuel canopy roof shall be removed and the existing terra cotta tiles shall remain. 3. The applicant shall comply with AB 341 and AB 1826, which require that commercial businesses generating more than four cubic yards of waste per week participate in a commercial waste recycling program, and that businesses that sell food must also participate in a food waste recycling program. The project will require at least a three cubic yard bin each for waste and mixed recyclables and shall also make provisions for an additional bin for food waste. Standard Conditions of Approval 4. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet. 5. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 17 feet long with a required 1 -foot overhang (e.g., over a curb stop). 6. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. 7. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/plazas/ recreational uses. S. Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours. 9. The lighting fixture design shall compliment the architectural program. It shall include the plaza area lighting fixtures, building lighting fixtures (exterior), and parking lot lighting fixtures. 10. The Master Plan is approved in concept only. Future development for (each building pad/parcel; shall be subject to a separate Development/Design Review process. 11. Signs shall be conveniently posted for "no overnight parking" and for "employee parking only." Printed 5,25?2018 wWM.CityofRC.us E1—E6 Pg285 Page 711 Project #: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR !!1 Archibald Oil Location: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 12. All operations and businesses shall be conducted to comply with the following standards which shall be incorporated into the lease agreements for all tenants: a. Noise Level - All commercial activities shall not create any noise that would exceed an exterior noise level of 65 dB during the hours of 10 p.m. until 7 a.m. and 70 dB during the hours of 7 a.m. until 10 p.m. b. Loading and Unloading - No person shall cause the loading, unloading, opening, closing, or other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials, garbage cans, or other similar objects between the hours of 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. unless otherwise specified herein, in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to a residential area. 13. Any outdoor vending machines shall be recessed into the building faces and shall not extend into the pedestrian walkways. The design details shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 14. Textured pavement shall be provided across circulation aisle, pedestrian walkway, and plaza. They shall be of brick/tile pavers, exposed aggregate, integral color concrete, or any combination thereof. Full samples shall be submitted for Planning Department review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 15. Trash collection shall occur between the hours of 7:00 am and 7:00 pm only. 16. Provide for the following design features in each trash enclosure, to the satisfaction of the Planning Department: a. Architecturally integrated into the design of (the shopping center/the project). b. Separate pedestrian access that does not require the opening of the main doors and to include self-closing pedestrian doors. c. Large enough to accommodate two trash bins. d. Roll -up doors. e. Trash bins with counter -weighted lids. f. Architecturally treated overhead shade trellis. g. Chain link screen on top to prevent trash from blowing out of the enclosure and designed• to be hidden from view. 17. The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and in no event shall trash and debris remain for more than 24 hours. 18. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs. 19. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for Planning Department and Engineering Services Department approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. Printed; 5/25/2018 wovw.CRyofRC.us Page 2 of 17 E1—E6 Pg286 Page 712 Project #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 DR 11! Archibald Oil 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Plan ning_Department Standard Conditions of Approval 20. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and Development Code regulations. 21. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Department review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 22. A minimum of 20 percent of trees planted within industrial projects, and a minimum of 30 percent within commercial and office projects, shall be specimen size trees - 24 -inch box or larger. 23. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15 -gallon tree for every three parking stalls. 24. All ground -mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Department. 25. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building. 26. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water efficient landscaping per Development Code Chapter 17.82. 27. For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll -up doors and service doors to match main building colors. 28. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections shall be screened from all sides and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. Any roof -mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically more than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet, shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent nature with the building design and is detailed consistent with the building. Any roof -mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically less than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet shall be painted consistent with the color scheme of the building: Details shall be included in building plans. 29. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. Printed: 5125/2018 www.CityofRC.US Page 3 of 17 E1—E6 Pg287 Page 713 Project #: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name Location: Project Type: DR 111 Archibald Oil 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.- Planning ROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 30. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 31. For multi -family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on. -site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. 32. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption and Mitigated Negative Declaration fee in the amount of $2,330.75. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing. 33. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 34. Any modification or intensification of the approved use, including revisions in the operations of the business including changes to the operating days/hours; change in the location on-site or within the building of the use/activity that is approved by this Conditional Use Permit; improvements including new building construction; and/or other modifications/intensification beyond what is specifically approved by this Conditional Use Permit, shall require the review and approval by the Planning Director prior to submittal of documents for plan check/occupancy, construction, commencement of the activity, and/br issuance of a business license. The Planning Director may determine that modifications or intensifications of use require the submittal of an application to 'Modify this Conditional Use Permit for review by the City. 35. Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in accordance with the Development Code Section 17.80.050, and so noted on the grading plans. The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans. 36. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 37. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Services Department. 38. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. Printed: 512512018 wWW.CRyofR&S Page 4 of 17 E1 --E6 Pg288 Page 714 Project #: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR II! Archibald Oil Location: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Pia_nninq Department Standard Conditions of Approval 39. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be- submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 40. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director and Police Department (909-477-2800) prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 41. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Services Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance and final acceptance granted prior to occupancy. 42. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 43. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 44. Revised Site Plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 45. Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock. Other stone veneers may be manufactured products. 46. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, and the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 47. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes. En-gineering Services De artment Please be advised of the following Special Conditions Printed: 5/25/2018 www.CityofRC.us Page 5 of 17 E7 --E6 Pg289 Page 715 Project#: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR 111 Archibald Oil Location. 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Engineerinq Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Archibald Avenue frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Major Arterial" standards as required and including: a. Curb adjacent sidewalk may remain, repair damaged sidewalk as required. b. Remove the most southerly drive approach on Archibald Avenue and replace with curb and gutter. c. A total of 50 feet on Archibald Avenue, measured from the street centerline, shall be dedicated to the City. d. Relocate existing traffic signal equipment. e. Drive approach shall be a minimum width of 35 feet per City Standard Plan 101, Type C. 2. The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) on the project side of Archibald Avenue shall be undergrounded to the first pole offsite north of the north project boundary and to the first pole offsite south of Arrow Route, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever comes first. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development (redevelopment) as it occurs on the opposite side of the street. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public improvement being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. 3. Arrow Route frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Major Arterial" standards as required and including: a. Provide right-of-way dedication and construct right turn lane per City Standard Pian 119. b. Relocate existing traffic signal equipment. c. Relocate the existing street light, as it is located at the proposed driveway. d. Drive approach shall be a minimum width of 35 feet per City Standard Plan 101, Type C. e. Provide a signing and:striping plan. Printed: 512512018 www.CityafRC.us Page 6 of 17 E1 --E6 Pg 290 Page 716 Project #: Project Name Location: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 DR 111 Archibald Oil 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 4. The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) on the project side of Arrow Route shall be undergrounded to the first pole offsite east of the east project boundary to the first pole offsite west of Archibald Avenue, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever comes first. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development (redevelopment) as it occurs on the opposite side of the street. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public improvement being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. 5. Reconstruct access ramp at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route to comply with current ADA requirements. A detail will have to be added to the street improvement plan showing the design details, elevations, and grades of the access ramp to substantiate they comply with ADA requirements. Design shall be completed and improvements secured for prior to issuance of Building permit. The reconstruction along with all public improvements shall be completed prior to occupancy. 6. Provide an easement along the easterly portion of the 8477 Archibald Avenue, APN 0208-291-05 for the benefit of the parcel to the east, APN 0208-291-06 for ingress and egress prior to building permit issuance. When the parcel to the east develops they will be required to provide an easement along the westerly portion of their property for ingress and egress, for a shared driveway. If the parcel to the east APN 0208-291-06 will allow the easement along the westerly portion of their property, concurrently with the development of 8477 Archibald Avenue, APN 0208-291-05, the driveway may be centered between the two properties. Standard Conditions of Approval 7. Corner property line cutoff shall be dedicated per City Standards. 8. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the. developer. 9. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Permits issued on or after June 2, 2014, must complete the reimbursement process through the City's Accelerate online portal within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project or the deposit will be forfeited. Permits issued before June 2, 2014, require the following when applying for a deposit reimbursement: a completed CD -2 form, a copy of the cashier's receipt showing the deposit amount, and all weight tickets. Instructions and forms are available at the City's web site, www.CityofRC.us, under City Hall; Engineering; Environmental Programs. Printed; 512512016 www.CityofRC.us Page 7 of 17 EI—E6 Pg291 Page 717 Project #., DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR 111 Archibald Oil Location: Project Type: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineerinq Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 10. Add the following note to any private landscape plans that show street trees: "All improvements within the public right-of-way, including street trees, shall be installed per the public improvement plans." If there is a discrepancy between the public and private plans, the street improvement plans will govern. 11. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 12. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 13. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. Printed: 512512018 www.CityofRC.us Page 8 cf 17 E1—E6 Pg292 Page 718 Project #: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR 111 Archibald Oil Location: 8477 ARCHIBAL.D AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Enqineerinq Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 14. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3 -inch pvc with pull rope or as specified. e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per latest ADA standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. 15. Street trees, a minimum of 15 -gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. Eire Prevention 1 New Construction Unit Standard Conditions of Approval 1. New canopy shall not reduce the clearance of the existing canopy. When the entitlement process is approved, submit tank and fuel dispensing plans to the San Bernardino County Fire Department, Hazardous Materials Division. Subsequent to their approval, bring approval letter to Building and Safety for building permit issuance. Canopy, store, and carwash plans shall be submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department. Buildinq and Safety Services Department Printed: 5.125/2018 w5rm.Ci1yo1`RC.us Page 9 of 17 E1 --E6 Pg293 Page 719 Project #: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR Ill Archibald Oil Location: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Building and Safety Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. When the Design Review is approved submit complete construction drawings including structural calculations to Building and Safety for plan review in accordance with the current edition of the CA Building and Fire Codes. A soils report is required for new structures. All disabled access to the site and building must be provided in accordance to current regulations at the time of plan check submittal. New trash enclosure roof structure must be of fire retardant lumber or non-combustible materials. Classify existing canopy as an S-1 occupancy, Installation of underground fuel tanks and dispensing fuel pumps require review and plan check approval from San Bernardino County Fire Department, Hazardous Materials Division. CVWD - Provide a plumbing plan submittal to the local water purveyor. Building and Safety will not issue building permits until a plumbing first release is obtained by the applicant from CVWD. New area lights shall be minimum 14'-6" clear above the drive aisle, where lights overhang the drive aisle. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 1. NONRESIDENTIAL MANDATORY MEASURES — CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE — Prior to the issuance of any building permit the applicant shall comply with Section 5.106.10 (Grading and paving) of the current adopted California Green Building Standards Code: Construction plans shall indicate how site grading or a drainage system will manage all surface water flows to keep water from entering buildings. Examples of methods to manage surface water include, but are not limited to, the following: 1. Swales. 2. Water collection and disposal systems. 3. French drains. 4. Water retention gardens. 5. Other water measures which keep surface water away from buildings and aid in groundwater recharge. Exception: Additions and alterations not altering the drainage. path. - Printed: 5!2512018 tiwJw.CityofRC.us page ZO of 17 E1 -E6 Pg294 Page 720 Project #: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR /// Archibald Oil Location: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 2. NONRESIDENTIAL MANDATORY MEASURES — CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE — Prior to the issuance of any building permit the applicant shall comply with Section 5.106.1 (Storm water pollution prevention) of the current adopted California Green Building Standards Code: Newly construction projects and additions which disturb less than one acre of land shall prevent the pollution of stormwater runoff from the construction activities through one or more of the following measures: 1.106.1.1 Local Ordinance — Comply with a lawfully enacted stormwater management and/or erosion control ordinance. 1.106.1.2 Best Management Practices (BMP) -- Prevent the loss of soil through wind or water erosion by implementing an effective combination of erosion and sediment control and good housekeeping BMP. I. Soil loss BMP that should be considered for implementation as appropriate for each project include, but are not limited to, the following: a. Scheduling construction activity. b. Preservation of natural features, vegetation and soil. c. Drainage swales or lined ditches to control stormwater flow. d. Mulching or hydroseeding to stabilize disturbed soils. e. Erosion control to protect slopes. f. Protection of storm drain inlets (gravel bags or catch basin inserts). g. Perimeter sediment control (perimeter silt fence, fiber rolls). h. Sediment trap or sediment basin to retain sediment on site. i. Stabilized construction exits. j. Wind erosion control. k. Other soil loss BMP acceptable to the enforcing agency. 2. Good housekeeping BMP to manage construction equipment, materials and wastes that should be considered for implementation as appropriate for each project include, but are not limited to, the following: a. Material handling and waste management. b. Building materials stockpile management. c. Management of washout areas (concrete, paints, stucco, etc.). d. Control of vehicle/equipment fueling to contractors staging area. e. Vehicle and equipment cleaning performed off site. f. Spill prevention and control. g. Other housekeeping BMP acceptable to the enforcing agency (City of Rancho Cucamonga). 3. As the project is proposing to move less than 50 cubic yards of earth, the project is conditioned to provide a precise drainage plan showing the elevation(s) of the new structures, new drainage features, including but not limited to, curbs and v -gutters, drainage pipe, catch basins, along with locations of new pavement, removal and replacement pavement(s), and pavement overlays. Primed: 5/25/2018 tivww.CityofRC.us Page 11 of 77 E1—E6 Pg295 Page 721 Project #: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DR02016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR 111 Archibald Oil Location: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 4. Prior to approval of the final project -specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project -specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". 5. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the Building Official, or his designee, the civil engineer of record shall file a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Post Construction Storm Water Treatment Devices As -Built Certificate with the Environmental Programs Coordinator, City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Services Department. 6. As the use of drywells are proposed for the structural storm water treatment device, to meet the infiltration requirements of the "current Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Systems (MS4) Permit, adequate source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration shall be evaluated prior to infiltration and discussed in the final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan document. Printed:.512512018 Un ".CityofRc.us page 12 of 17 E1—E6 Pg296 Page 722 Project #: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR 111 Archibald Oil Location: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT; Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 7. GROUND WATER PROTECTION: Prior to approval of the final project specific water quality management plan (WQMP), the WQMP document shall meet the requirements of the State Water Resources Control Board Order No. R8-2010-0036 (NPDES No. CAS 618036), the San Bernardino County Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Separation (MS4) Permit reads: Section Xi.D(Water Quality Management Plan Requirements).8(Groundwater Protection): Treatment Control BMPs utilizing infiltration [exclusive of incidental infiltration and BMPs not designed to primarily function as infiltration devices (such as grassy swales, detention basins, vegetated buffer strips, constructed wetlands, etc.)] must comply with the following minimum requirements to protect groundwater: a. Use of structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause or contribute to an exceedance of ground water quality objectives. b. Source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment .BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration should be evaluated prior to infiltration. c. Adequate pretreatment of runoff prior to infiltration shall be required in gas stations and large commercial parking lots. (NOTE: The State Water Quality Control Board defines a large commercial parking lot as `100,000 sq. ft. or more of commercial development to include parking lot (with 100 or more vehicle traffics), OR, by means of 5,000sgft or more of allowable space designated for parking purposes'). d. Unless adequate pre-treatment of runoff is provided prior to infiltration structural infiltration treatment BMPs must not be used for areas of industrial or light industrial activity{77}, areas subject to high vehicular traffic (25,000 or more daily traffic); car washes; fleet storage areas; nurseries; or any other high threat to water quality land uses or activities. e. Class V injection wells or dry wells must not be placed in areas subject to vehicular{78} repair or maintenance activities{79}, such as an auto body repair shop, automotive repair shop, new and used car dealership, specialty repair shop (e.g., transmission and muffler repair shop) or any facility that does any vehicular repair work. f. Structural infiltration BMP treatment shall not be used at sites that are known to have soil and groundwater contamination. g. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall be located at least 100 feet 'horizontally from any water supply wells. h. The vertical distance from the bottom of any infiltration structural treatment BMP to the historic high groundwater mark shall be at least 10 -Meet. Where the groundwater basins do not support beneficial uses, this vertical distance criteria may be reduced, provided groundwater quality is maintained. i. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause a nuisance or pollution as defined in Water Code Section 13050. The final project -specific Water Quality Management Pian shall, specifically address items, a., b., c., d., and e., above. Printed: 5125!2018 www.CKyofRC.us Page 13 of 17 E1—E6 Pg297 Page 723 Project #: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR 111 Archibald Oil Location: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT; Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 8. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 9. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. All dust control sign (s) shall be located outside of the public right of way. 10. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on-site construction where possible, and shall provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 11. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 12. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout "Information for Grading Pians and Permit". 13. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy or final sign off by the Building Inspector the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) storm water treatment devices and best management practices (BMP). 14. The applicant shall provide a copy of a completed EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of injection Wells) for each underground infiltration device, with the Facility iD Number assigned, to the Building and Safety Services Department Official prior to issuance of the Grading Permit and/or approval of the project -specific Water Quality Management Plan. A copy of EPA Form 7520-16 shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set, and a copy of said form shall be included in the project -specific Water Quality Management Plan. 15. The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the structural storm water treatment devices, commonly referred to as BMPs, to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 16. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code and/or the California Residential Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 17. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 18. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall(s) on property perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property linea 19. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the grading and parking stall gradient at 5 percent. Accessibility parking current adopted California Building Code. shall obtain written permission from the line(s) or provide a detail(s) showing the drainage plan shall show the maximum stall grades shall be constructed per the, Prinked: 5125i2018 www.CityofRC.us Page 14 of 17 E1 -E6 Pg298 Page 724 Project #: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR /// Archibald Oil Location: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 20. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100 -feet beyond project boundary. 21. Grading inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre -grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre -grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: 1) The bottom of the over -excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 22. All roof drainage flowing to the public right of way (Arrow Route) must drain under the sidewalk through a parkway culvert approved by the Engineering Department. This shall be shown on both the grading and drainage plan and Engineering Services Department required plans. 23. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the permitted grading plan set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CSC 1804.3/CRC R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.2/CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted California Building Code/Residential Code. 24. Private sewer, water, and storm drain: improvements will be designed per the latest adopted California Plumbing Code. Private storm drain improvements shall be shown on the -grading and drainage plan. 25. Prior to approval of the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), the WQMP shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 26. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 27. The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for the Class V Injection Wells/underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. Printed: 5/25/2018 www.CityofRC.us Page 15 of 17 E1—E6 Pg299 Page 725 Project ##: Project Name: Location: Project Type: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 DR/// Archibald Oil 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 28. The land/property owner shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved project specific Water Quality Management Pian and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a biennial basis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. 29. A final project -specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be approved by the Building and Safety Director, or his designee, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit or any building permit. 30. Prior to the start of landscaping operations, the landscape architect and the landscape contractor shall provide a sample of the weed fabric barrier to the Project Planner, City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The weed barrier shall be permeable. 31. The final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP) shall include executed maintenance agreements along with the maintenance guidelines for all proprietary structural storm water treatment devices (BMP's). In the event the applicant cannot get the proprietary device maintenance agreements executed prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant is required to submit a letter to be included within the WQMP document, and scanned and pasted onto the Site and Drainage Plan which states that prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy with applicant shall enter into a contract for the maintenance of the proprietary storm water treatment device. if the proprietary storm water treatment device is part of a residential subdivision, prior to the sale of the residential lot, the developer shall include maintenance agreement(s) as part of the sale of the residential lot to the buyer. A copy of the maintenance agreements to be included in the sale of the property shall be included within the WQMP document. 32. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the project specific water quality management plan all private storm water catch basin inlets shall include insert filters to capture those pollutants of concern as addressed in the in the final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP). At a minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris. All catch basin insert filters shall be maintained on a regular basis as described in the "Inspection and Maintenance Responsibility for Post Construction BMP" section of the final project -specific water quality management plan. 33. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project -Specific Water Quality Management Plan shall include a completed copy of "Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet" located in Appendix D "Section VII — Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety Recommendations, ..." of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans. The infiltration study shall include the Soil Engineer's recommendations for Appendix. D, Table VII.3: Suitability Assessment Related Considerations for Infiltration Facility Safety Factors". 34. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a drainage easement or letter from the downstream property owners accepting concentrated drainage flows. 35. The Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) has been deemed "Acceptable". Prior to the issuance of a grading permit a final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official. Printed: 5/25/2018 www.CityofRC.us Page 16 of 17 ET—E6 Pg300 Page 726 Project #: 'DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR 111 Archibald Oil Location: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 36. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 37. All roof drainage flowing to the public right of way (xx Avenue) must drain under the sidewalk through a parkway culvert approved by the Engineering Department. 38. The applicant shall provide a copy of EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) with the Facility ID Number assigned to the Building and. Safety Services Department Official prior to issuance of the Grading Permit. 39. The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for the underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 40. Prior to approval of the project -specific storm water quality management plan, the applicant shall submit to the Building Official, or his designee, a precise grading plan showing the location and elevations of existing topographical features, and showing the location and proposed elevations of proposed structures and drainage of the site. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 5/25/2018 Page 17 of 17 E1—E6 Pg301 Page 727 .JULY 11, 2018 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA A. 7:00 P.M. — CALL TO ORDER 7:00 PM Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call: Chairman Oaxaca x Vice Chairman Macias x Commissioner Guglielmo x�, Commissioner Munoz _x_ Commissioner Wimberly ,x Additional Staff Present: Nick Ghirelli, Assistant City Attorney; Tom Grahn, Associate Planner, Albert Espinoza, Asst. City Engineer; Lois Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary; Mike Smith, Senior Planner, Nikki Cavazos, Assistant Planner; Susan Shaker, Admin Assistant B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Historic Preservation Commission or Planning Commission on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Commission from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Commission may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individual members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. None C. CONSENT CALENDAR/HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION Page 1 of 14 Page 728 dVLT 1 11 LV 10 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non -controversial. They will be acted upon by the Commission at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed for discussion. C1. Consideration to adopt Regular Meeting Minutes of June 13, 2018 C2. Consideration to adopt Regular Meeting Minutes of June 27, 2018 Moved by Munoz, seconded by Wimberly, carried 5-0 to adopt the Consent Calendar, D. SCHEDULED MATTERS The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Chairman may open the meeting for public input. D1. SELECTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION/PLANNING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN AND VICE CHAIRMAN OFFICER POSITIONS Moved by Wimberly, seconded by Munoz, carried 5-0 to select Commissioner Macias as Chairman and Commissioner Guglielmo as Vice Chairman_ D2. SELECTION OF DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MEMBERS Commissioner Macias reported that he has a regular conflict with the Tuesday evening meetings and therefore asked to be relieved from the Committee. Moved by Oaxaca, seconded by Macias, carried 5-0 to select Commissioner Guglielmo and Commissioner Wimberly and Commissioner Munoz as First Alternate. D3. SELECTION OF THE COMMISSION REPRESENTATIVES FOR THE TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE Moved by Oaxaca, seconded by Munoz, carried 5-0 to maintain the current membership of Commissioners Oaxaca and Munoz until further notice as recommended by staff. Page 2 of 14 Page 729 JULY 11, 2018 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA E. PUBLIC HEARINGS/PLANNING COMMISSION The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chairman will open the public hearing to receive testimony. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual or less as determined by the Chairman. Please sign in after speaking. E1. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2015-00683 — ARCHIBALD OIL -- A request to amend the General Plan land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial for a 1.22 -acre site located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route; APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06. Related Files: Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684, Design Review DRC2015-00682, Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-00681, Variance DRC2016-00831, and Minor Exception DRC2017-00879. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. This application will be forwarded to the City Council for final action. CONTINUED FROM JUNE 13, 2018 AND JUNE 27, 2018. E2. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONING MAP AMENDMENT DRC2015-00684 — ARCHIBALD OIL —A request to amend the Zoning Map land use district from the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the General Commercial (GC) District for a 1.22 -acre site located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route; APNs: APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683, Design Review DRC2015-00682, Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-00681, Variance DRC2016-00831, and Minor Exception DRC2017-00879. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. This application will be forwarded to the City Council for final action. CONTINUED FROM JUNE 13, 2018 AND JUNE 27, 2018. E3. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2015-00682 — ARCHIBALD OIL — A request to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re-establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 square foot car wash on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue; APN: 0208-291-05. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684, Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-00681, Variance DRC2016-00831, and Minor Exception DRC2017-00879. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Page 3 of 14 Page 730 JULY 11, 2018 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA environmental impacts for consideration. CONTINUED FROM JUNE 13, 2018 AND JUNE 27, 2018. E4. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2015-00681 — ARCHIBALD OIL -- A request to establish a 968 square foot automated car wash associated with a request to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building and re-establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue; APN: 0208-291-05. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684, Design Review DRC2015-00682, Variance DRC2016-00831, and Minor Exception DRC2017-00879. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. CONTINUED FROM JUNE 13, 2018 AND JUNE 27, 2018. E5. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VARIANCE DRC2016-00831 — ARCHIBALD OIL -- A request to reduce the parking setback from 10 feet to 5 feet -6 inches for the proposed request to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re-establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 square foot car wash on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue; APN: 0208-291-05. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684, Design Review DRC2015-00682, Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-00681, and Minor Exception DRC2017-00879. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. CONTINUED FROM JUNE 13, 2018 AND JUNE 27, 2018. E6. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2017-00879 — ARCHIBALD OIL — A request to reduce on-site parking by 12.5% for the proposed request to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re- establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 square foot car wash on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue; APN: 0208-291-05. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684, Design Review DRC2015-00682, Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-00681, and Variance Page 4 of 14 Page 731 JULY 11, 2018 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DRC2016-00831. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. CONTINUED FROM JUNE 13, 2018 AND JUNE 27, 2018. Tom Grahn, Associate Planner, gave the staff report and PowerPoint presentation (copy on file). He noted that comment letters were received from Burrtec, California Department of Toxic Substance Control, and SQAMD. All issues have been adequately addressed. He noted there are some changes to the resolutions for the GPA and ZMA which have been placed on the dais. The changes are related to recent housing legislation. Tom Grahn, noted to the Commissioners the GPA and ZMA resolutions were revised addressing SB 966, and were on the dais for their review. Chairman Oaxaca opened the public hearing. The representative for the applicant, Michael Pauls, began his comments by thanking staff for their efforts and Tom Grahn whom they've been working with for 2 years. He spoke about the comprehensive oversight of Chevron franchises. He agrees with the conditions of approval as recommended by staff. He also recapped the history of the site noting since its closure, has become an eyesore. He said carwashes now have drought tolerant features per California.. He emphasized that the project meets noise standards for the City and surrounding neighborhoods and that they will also be hiring locally and creating 95 new jobs. They will encourage use of public transportation for workers. The site will be completely monitored by security cameras. He noted the lighting will not encroach onto other properties and when they did community outreach, the locals seemed to welcome the new facility. Suket Doyal, representing Quality Development, who owns a business across from proposed project which includes a mechanics shop and a larger retail space. He stated the prior station was not abandoned as suggested, but the City denied previous owners when they wanted to re -open which he indicated could be a possible liability. He believes there is more of a need for affordable housing in the City and that a lot of exceptions are being made for this gas station. For example, other locations cannot have pumps visible from street, but this project is being allowed to keep pumps visible. He asked that the Commission, at minimum, to restrict the sale of alcohol, and tobacco products since the station is located across from a school. Vic (last name unintelligible) The owner of Rancho Car Wash, Liquor Paradise, and a flower shop in the City, stated, he does not understand why the City is allowing more gas stations and car washes since there are 9 gas stations and 5 car washes within a 2.5 mile -radius. He stated that he previously asked the City about that lot and was told it would never be a gas Page 5 of 14 Page 732 %JULT 1 19 LV 10 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA station. Therefore, he spent 6.5 million on the full-service car wash on Hermosa and Arrow. He stated that he lost 25% business when a gas station opened on Haven and the proposed project will negatively affect his business. He believes the site should be something the community needs such as a grocery store, and the gas station will attract homeless people who use needles and will increase break-ins. Brandon (last name unknown) stated that there are many gas stations within a 2 -mile radius and believes the site could be put to better use. He's also concerned about the school down street and the fumes and poisons that will be generated by the gas station. Elias (last name unintelligible) stated that he drives by the site every day and it is located on a great corner. He never thought a gas station would go in that site and there is not a need for it and he further believes it will take jobs from other car washes. Oscar, the manager of another car wash, which is 2000 feet from proposed site, stated that a new station may generate new jobs but his employees may lose their jobs or hours. Commissioner Oaxaca asked him if his car wash was full service. Oscar confirmed that it is a full-service car wash. Alan Smith — Co-owner of a property that is east of this project, suggested a change in the site plan by moving the proposed driveway away from the exit of the carwash and creating a 50 - foot center driveway. He said he has already spoken to Engineering Services with the City about the proposed change and stated he is willing to share the cost. He said he supports the project because the City is experiencing growth, especially in multi -family units and there are lots of residents. He also thinks that the project has good architecture, keeping with the historical theme and if done right, the project should be good for the City. He stated that he doesn't see competition because the car wash down the street is full service, not express or automated and different people have places that fit their financial needs. He supports the project because it will clean up the area. An unidentified speaker said he is a Car wash employee that grew up in a poor neighborhood and started smoking since he was young and doesn't want his son to smoke and believes the gas station will encourage early smoking. He suggested a better usage would be fast food. Duke, a resident for 10 years, stated he would like a bank or car rental center. Page 6 of 14 Page 733 JVLT 1 1 9 LV 10 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Chairman Oaxaca closed public hearing. Michael Pauls responded to the speakers by stating that he appreciated what the speakers had to say. Addressing the comments about the car wash located % mile to east, he stated that specific business sells alcohol, has a quick service restaurant, and is a full service, detail center. Therefore, the proposed project will not compete with the existing car wash since they will not serve alcohol and have no quick serve restaurant. He went on to state gas station distances are measured by their distances from each other on the same side of the street, with the flow of traffic. The proposed project will be the only gas station northbound on Archibald Avenue and going west on Arrow Route. Since people flow into service stations with the direction of traffic, the gas station would be a good fit for the area and they are investing 3 million into the project. Commissioner Guglielmo mentioned the proposed project will not sell alcohol and asked about the sale of tobacco. Michael Pauls replied yes, tobacco will be sold, but there will be signs that smoking on site is prohibited. He also stated that the number of smokers is rapidly shrinking. Chairman Oaxaca closed the public hearing. Commissioner Wimberly commented that the report was very comprehensive and feels the project is a good fit for the location. He further stated the timeframe to deal with this project has been long. He recommended support of staff's recommendation. Commission Guglielmo stated that this is a tough decision, he's weighing the possibilities, wants to listen to the community and thanked them for their comments. Chairman Oaxaca said that it's important to understand the role of this Commission. It is not to determine if a business is economically viable or if it will affect viability of other businesses. The role of the Commission is to determine the appropriate uses of land and to promote overall growth and the development of the City. He has seen this site come and go over the years and observed that it's been left in poor condition for a long time. While others have looked at it for other reasons, a company has decided they can make the business work. He also commented on the nearby school and stated that it is a unique school which focuses on preschool age children with special needs. There will not be kids walking to and from or being Page 7 of 14 Page 734 ,JUL i 1 [ , LV 10 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA dropped off by busses like a normal school. They will be escorted, supervised, and tightly controlled. Regarding the nearby car wash, he notes that people choose what level of service they want at a car wash and there is a difference between a full-service car wash and an automated car wash. He stated there is always a place for a strong business in Rancho Cucamonga and with new development in the City, there will be demand. Commissioner Munoz concurred with Chairman Oaxaca regarding his remarks about the role of the Commission. He said the full application proposal is complex but does meet City requirements with some minor exceptions. He stated that the site is unlikely to be housing, the site is complementary to what is already there, and the permit is not detrimental to public interest. He stated that there are no other current options and it's been vacant for over 20 years. There is no action that accommodates both sides and the Planning Commission is not responsible for picking a winner, but instead we let the market decide. He noted that at the neighborhood meeting only 3 people attended and the driveway was the only issue raised and that is being worked out. Chairman Oaxaca commented that car washes currently have the attention of the City and last month the City Council passed a moratorium regarding car washes, but this project was already in progress prior to the moratorium. Council and Staff will be looking at these standards. Nick Ghirelli noted that the remaining entitlements are contingent upon the approval of GPA and ZMA by City Council. Moved by Munoz, seconded by Wimberly, carried 5-0 to adopt the Resolutions recommending approval of General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment as amended by staff to the City Council for final action along with the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts and to adopt the resolutions approving the Design Review, Conditional Use Permit, Variance and Minor Exception which are contingent on the approval of the General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment. E7. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2013-00229 - ST. YOSTINA CHURCH - A request to add 2,390 square feet of floor area to an existing 4,849 square foot church in the Very Low (VL) Residential District, on the west side of Sapphire Street south of Lemon Avenue, located at 6386 Sapphire Street; APN: 1062-332-25. Related Files: Minor Design Review DRC2013- 00230. Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The project qualifies as a Class 1 exemption Page 8 of 14 Page 735 JVLT 1 1 9 LV 1 O HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301, which covers minor additions to existing developments. E8. MINOR DESIGN REVIEW DRC2013-00230 - ST. YOSTINA CHURCH - A request to add 2,390 square feet of floor area to an existing 4,849 square foot church and the addition of 76 parking spaces to an existing 54 space parking lot in the Very Low (VL) Residential District, on the west side of Sapphire Street south of Lemon Street, located at 6386 Sapphire Street; APN: 1062-332-25. Related Files: Conditional Use Permit DRC2013-00229. Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The project qualifies as a Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301, which covers minor additions to existing developments, and the project qualifies as a Class 11 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15311, which covers the construction of small parking lots. Tom Grahn, Associate Planner, gave the staff report and PowerPoint presentation (copy on file). George Botros, architect and church member, noted the site is 5 acres, but the church is small. There is not enough seating and no office for Father John. Further there is dust created by the bare parking area and they will be adding parking and landscaping to fix this issue. Chairman Oaxaca opened the public hearing. Father John, Priest of SL Yostina, gave a brief history about the Coptic Orthodox church which was established in the first century by apostle Mark. This church started in 2090 with 35 families and has now grown to over 400 families. He stated that the property is great for expansion and the project needs to move forward. He also noted that they have a good relationship with neighbors and only a few came to the neighborhood meeting. Chairman Oaxaca closed the public hearing Commissioner Munoz stated that he fully supports the project and has -seen the church grow. Commissioner Wimberly stated that he is also familiar with church and looks forward to the expansion. Commissioner Guglielmo commented that he frequently sees it while driving and he's glad to see something happen to the dirt parking lot, and likes the look of the new block wall. Page 9 of 14 Page 736 JULY 11, 2018 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Chairman Oaxaca and Vice -Chairman Macias both noted that they support the project. Moved by Wimberly, seconded by Munoz, carried 5-0 to adopt the resolutions approving the Conditional Use Permit and Minor Design Review as presented by staff. E9. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT MODIFICATION DRC2018-00387 - CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES FOR DEER CREEK CAR WASH - A request to modify previously approved Conditional Use Permit 84-37 to allow the construction of a self-service vacuum area with 19 new self-service stalls under an overhead canopy of 4,320 square feet in the Community Commercial (CC) District, Foothill Boulevard Overlay District, on the north side of Foothill Boulevard approximately 1,000 feet west of Haven at 10340 Foothill Boulevard; APN: 1077- 401-48. Related File: Site Development Review DRC2018-00260. Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Class 3, (CEQA Guidelines Section 15303) — New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures. E10. SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2018-00260- CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES FOR DEER CREEK CAR WASH - A request to construct a 4,320 -square foot solar canopy structure over a self-service vacuum area with 19 new self-service stalls in the Community Commercial (CC) District, Foothill Boulevard Overlay District, on the north side of Foothill Boulevard approximately 1,000 feet west of Haven Avenue at 10340 Foothill Boulevard; APN: 1077-401- 48. Related File: Conditional Use Permit Modification DRC2018-00387. Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Class 3, (CEQA Guidelines Section 15303) — New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures. Nikki Cavazos, Assistant Planner, gave the staff report and PowerPoint presentation (copy on file). She stated that one phone call was received after notifications were sent out and the person wanted to see elevations and had concerns about the aesthetics. He was satisfied after seeing the plans and had no further comments. Chuck Buquet from Charles Joseph Associates, representing the applicant, noted that this project was 2nd oldest car wash in the City. He thanked Nikki for her assistance with the project. He commented that modifications to existing buildings are sometimes needed and the City adapts to the needs of the market. The canopy is attractive and he agreed with the conditions of approval with no objections. Page 10 of 14 Page 737 JULr I I, cV 10 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Chairman Oaxaca opened the public hearing. No public comments were received. Chairman Oaxaca closed the public hearing. All Commissioners voiced support for the project. Moved by Munoz, seconded by Wimberly, carried 5-0 to adopt the resolutions approving the Conditional Use Permit Modification and Site Development Review as presented by staff. E11. VARIANCE DRC2017-01020 - MAYELA YIBALE - A request for a Variance to allow a one car attached garage and a one car detached garage for a proposed 1,740 square foot, two-story single-family residence on a vacant parcel of 5,072 square feet in the Low (L) Residential District, on the north side of 25th Street approximately 700 feet east of Hermosa Avenue; APN:0209-103-33. Related Files: Variance DRC2017-00552 and Minor Design Review DRC2017-00553. Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Class 3, (CEQA Guidelines Section 15303) — New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures. E12. VARIANCE DRC2017-00552 - MAYELA YIBALE — A request for a Variance to allow a reduced side yard setback for a proposed 1,740 square foot, two-story single-family residence with a one car attached garage and a one car detached garage on a vacant parcel of 5,072 square feet in the Low (L) Residential District, on the north side of 25th Street approximately 700 feet east of Hermosa Avenue; APN:0209-103-33. Related Files: Variance DRC2017-01020 and Minor Design Review DRC2017-00553. Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Class 3, (CEQA Guidelines Section 15303) — New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures. E13. MINOR DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00553 — MAYELA YIBALE — A request to construct a 1,740 -square foot, two-story single-family residence with a one car attached garage and a one car detached garage on a vacant parcel of 5,072 square feet in the Low (L) Residential District, on the north side of 25th Street approximately 700 feet east of Hermosa Avenue; APN:0209- 103-33. Related Files: Variance DRC2017-01020 and Variance DRC2017-00552. Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) a under Class 3, (CEQA Guidelines Section 15303) — New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures. Page 11 of 14 Page 738 JULY 1 1 I AU 10 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Nikki Cavazos, Assistant Planner, gave the staff report and PowerPoint presentation (copy on file). Applicant-Mayela Yibale, stated that she lived in Pomona previously and wanted a quieter place to live. She found this lot, but it's a difficult lot. Chairman Oaxaca opened the public hearing and closed the public hearing after seeing no public comments. Moved by Wimberly, seconded Macias, carried 5-0 to adopt the resolutions approving the Variances and Minor Design Review as presented by staff. F. COMMISSION BUSINESSIHISTORIC PRESERVATION AND PLANNING COMMISSION INTER -AGENCY UPDATES: None COMMISSION ANNOUNCEMENTS: None G. ADJOURNMENT 8:55 PM I, Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on Thursday, July 05, 2018, seventy two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. Page 12 of 14 Page 739 dULT I 1 I LU 10 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA -efs Lois J. Schrader Planning Commission Secretary City of Rancho Cucamonga INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After speaking, please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium. It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under "Public Comments." There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda. Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. A copy of any such materials should also be provided to the Secretary to be used for the official public record. All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. Requests for scheduling agenda items will be at the discretion of the Commission and the Planning Director. AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., except for legal City holidays. Page 13 of 14 Page 740 JULY 11, 2018 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of $2,793 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council), Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas, staff reports and minutes can be found at www.CitvofRC.us. Page 14 of 14 Page 741 X RESOLUTION NO. 18-37 \6J A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN MAP AMENDMENT NO. DRC2015-00683, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION FROM LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL TO GENERAL COMMERCIAL FOR A 1.22 -ACRE SITE LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND ARROW ROUTE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF — APNS' 0208-291-05 AND 0208-291-06. A. Recitals. 1. Archibald Oil filed an application for General Plan Amendment No. DRC2014-00683 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On June 13, 2018, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and continued the application to the June 27, 2018 Planning Commission meeting. 3. On June 27, 2018, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and continued the application to the July 11, 2018 Planning Commission meeting. 4. On July 11, 2018, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 5. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing on July 11, 2018, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to two parcels consisting of approximately 1.22 -acre of land, basically a rectangular configuration, located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route and the westerly parcel is presently improved with an inoperative service station and the easterly parcel is vacant. Said property is currently designated as Low Medium Residential; and Page 742 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-37 GPA DRC2015-00683 — ARCHIBALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 2 b. The property to the north of the subject site is designated Low Medium Residential and is improved with the Mulberry Early Education Center. To the west is Archibald Avenue and beyond that the property is designated Office and is vacant. The property to the east is designated Low Medium Residential and contains a single-family house. To the south is Arrow Route and beyond that the property is designated General Commercial and is improved with a commercial center; and C. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and d. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and f. This amendment is consistent with the adopted general plan, including the housing element. The amendment will not affect the housing elements overarching goal to provide opportunities and incentives for the provision of a variety of housing types and for all economic segments wishing to reside in the community regardless of race, religion, sex, or income group. This amendment maintains the housing element goal of providing adequate housing sites to allow and create new opportunities that enable a broad range of housing types; and g. The remaining sites identified in the housing element are adequate to meet the requirements of California Government Code Section 65583.2 and to accommodate the City's share of the regional housing need pursuant to Section 65584. The City's regional housing need includes a requirement for 209 Very Low-income housing units, 141 Low -Income housing units, 158 Moderate -Income housing units, and 340 Above Moderate -Income housing units for a total of 848 housing units. Pursuant to the housing element, the City has a capacity of 1,054 Very Low -Income and Low -Income housing units, and 4,812 Moderate -income and Above Moderate - Income housing units; and h. With the adoption of this General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment, the City's housing capacity will be reduced by 3 Moderate -Income and Above Moderate -Income housing units. Accordingly, the remaining capacity of sites identified in the housing element at each income level will be as follows: 1,025 Very Low -Income and Low -Income housing units, and 3,529 Moderate -income and Above Moderate -Income housing units. The City's remaining unmet housing need at each income level will be as follows: 191 Very Low - Income housing units, 130 Low -Income housing units, 127 Moderate -Income units, and 0 Above Moderate -Income housing units. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area as the project site is currently developed as a service station land use, although it has been inactive Page 743 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-37 GPA DRC2015-00683 — ARCHIBALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 3 since 2002. The project site is suitable for a service station land use, provides appropriate site access, has all utility services available, and can be conditioned to meet all related performance criteria and development standards for a service station and carwash facility. The vacant easterly parcel provides sufficient area for the development of a commercial land use consistent with all applicable development standards; and b. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties; the project site has been previously disturbed (development of the service station use) and by the surrounding residential, commercial. industrial, and educational development, and the project has been designed to appropriately address all applicable development standards; and C, That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan as the proposed General Plan Amendment is consistent with General Plan policies LU -1.2 and LU -2.4. Policy LU -1.2 states "Designate appropriate land uses to serve the local needs and be able to respond to regional market needs, as appropriate." The reestablishment of the existing service station and development of the carwash land use will serve the local population's fuel and carwash needs, and will support the surrounding community's needs as both Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route are identified as Major Arterials (General Plan Figure CM -2) with a significant daily traffic volume. Policy LU -2.4 states "Promote complementary infill development, rehabilitation, and re- use that contribute positively to the surrounding residential neighborhood areas." The rehabilitation and reuse of this service station facility and the eventual infill development of the vacant easterly parcel will contribute positively to the surrounding residential area by permitting significant site plan and aesthetic improvements to an underutilized project site. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends the City Council adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the -City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration; and b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission therefore recommends the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration; and Page 744 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-37 GPA DRC2015-00683 —ARCHIBALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 4 C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation, The Planning Commission therefore recommends the City Council adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project; and d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the City Council's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of General Plan Amendment No. DRC2015- 00683, as depicted in Attachment A, attached hereto. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF JULY 2018. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Francisco Oaxac , Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 1 1th day of July 2018, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS GUGLIELMO, MACIAS, MUNOZ, OAXACA, WIMBERLY NONE NONE NONE Page 745 General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 -- Archibald Oil C C= 2. . Existing: Low Medium Residential Proposed: General Commercial ATTACHMENT A =1 Page 746 E RESOLUTION NO. 18-38 N A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN ORDINANCE APPROVING ZONING MAP AMENDMENT NO. DRC2015-00684, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE ZONING MAP LAND USE DISTRICT FROM THE LOW MEDIUM (LM) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT TO THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL (GC) DISTRICT FOR A 1.22 ACRE SITE LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND ARROW ROUTE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF — APNS: 0208-291-05 AND 0208-291-06. A. Recitals. 1. Archibald Oil filed an application for Zoning Map Amendment No. DRC2015-00684. as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development District Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On June 13, 2018, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and continued the application to the June 27, 2018 Planning Commission meeting. 3. On June 27, 2018, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and continued the application to the July 11, 2018 Planning Commission meeting 4. On July 11, 2018, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application DRC2015-00684 and issued Resolution No. 18-37 recommending to the City Council that the associated General Plan Amendment No. DRC2015-00683 be approved. 5. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing on July 11, 2018, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to two parcels consisting of approximately 1.22 acres of land, basically a rectangular configuration, located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route and the westerly parcel is presently improved with an inoperative service station and the easterly parcel is vacant. Said property is currently designated as Low Medium Residential; and Page 747 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-38 ZMA DRC2015-00684 — ARCHIBALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 2 b. The property to the north of the subject site is designated Low Medium Residential and is improved with the Mulberry Early Education Center. To the west is Archibald Avenue and beyond that the property is designated Office and is vacant. The property to the east is designated Low Medium Residential and contains a single-family house. To the south is Arrow Route and beyond that the property is designated General Commercial and is improved with a commercial center; and C. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and d. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area the project site is currently developed as a service station land use, although it has been inactive since 2002. The project site is suitable for a service station land use, provides appropriate site access, has all utility services available, and can be conditioned to meet all related performance criteria and development standards for a service station and carwash facility. The vacant easterly parcel provides sufficient area for the development of a commercial land use consistent with all applicable development standards; and b. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties; the project site has been previously disturbed (development of the service station use) and by the surrounding residential, commercial, industrial, and educational development, and the project has been designed to appropriately address all applicable development standards; and C. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan as the proposed General Plan Amendment is consistent with General Plan policies LU -1.2 and LU -2.4. Policy LU -1.2 states "Designate appropriate land uses to serve the local needs and be able to respond to regional market needs, as appropriate." The reestablishment of the existing service station and development of the carwash land use will serve the local population's fuel and carwash needs, and will support the surrounding community's needs as both Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route are identified as Major Arterials (General Plan Figure CM -2) with a significant daily traffic volume. Policy LU -2.4 states "Promote complementary infill development, rehabilitation, and re- use that contribute positively to the surrounding residential neighborhood areas." The rehabilitation and reuse of this service station facility and the eventual infill development of the vacant easterly parcel will contribute positively to the surrounding residential area by permitting significant site plan and aesthetic improvements to an underutilized project site; and Page 748 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-38 ZMA DRC2015-00684 — ARCHIBALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 3 d. This amendment is consistent with the adopted general plan, including the housing element. The amendment will not affect the housing elements overarching goal to provide opportunities and incentives for the provision of a variety of housing types and for all economic segments wishing to reside in the community regardless of race, religion, sex, or income group. This amendment maintains the housing element goal of providing adequate housing sites to allow and create new opportunities that enable a broad range of housing types; and e. The remaining sites identified in the housing element are adequate to meet the requirements of California Government Code Section 65583.2 and to accommodate the City's share of the regional housing need pursuant to Section 65584. The City's regional housing need includes a requirement for 209 Very Low -Income housing units, 141 Low -Income housing units, 158 Moderate -Income housing units, and 340 Above Moderate -Income housing units for a total of 848 housing units. Pursuant to the housing element, the City has a capacity of 1,054 Very Low -Income and Low -Income housing units, and 4,812 Moderate -Income and Above Moderate - Income housing units; and f. With the adoption of this General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment, the City's housing capacity will be reduced by 3 Moderate -Income and Above Moderate -Income housing units. Accordingly, the remaining capacity of sites identified in the housing element at each income level will be as follows: 1,025 Very Low -Income and Low -Income housing units, and 3,529 Moderate -Income and Above Moderate -Income housing units. The City's remaining unmet housing need at each income level will be as follows: 191 Very Low - Income housing units, 130 Low -Income housing units, 127 Moderate -Income units, and 0 Above Moderate -Income housing units. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment recommends the City Council adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration; and b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission therefore recommends the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration; and Page 749 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-38 ZMA DRC2015-00684 — ARCHIBALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 4 C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore recommends the City Council adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project; and d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the City Council's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of Zoning Map Amendment No. DRC2015-00684, as depicted in Attachment A, attached hereto. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF JULY 2018. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: ATTI Candyce Burnett, Secre I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of July 2018, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: GUGLIELMO, MACIAS, MUNOZ, OAXACA, WIMBERLY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: NONE Page 750 so I RESOLUTION NO. 18-080 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN MAP AMENDMENT NO. DRC2015-00683, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION FROM LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL TO GENERAL COMMERCIAL FOR A 1.22 -ACRE SITE LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND ARROW ROUTE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF — APNS: 0208-291-05 AND 0208-291-06. A. Recitals. 1. Archibald Oil filed an application for General Plan Amendment No. DRC2014- 00683 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On June 13, 2018, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and continued the application to the June 27, 2018 Planning Commission meeting. 3. On June 27, 2018, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and continued the application to the July 11, 2018 Planning Commission meeting. 4. On July 11, 2018, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 5. On August 15, 2018, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 6. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above - referenced public hearing on August 15, 2018, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to two parcels consisting of approximately 1.22 -acres of land, basically a rectangular configuration, located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route and the westerly parcel is presently improved with an inoperative service station and the easterly parcel is vacant. Said property is currently designated as Low Medium Residential; and Page 752 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 18-080 GPA DRC2015-00683 —ARCHIBALD OIL August 15, 2018 Page 2 b. The property to the north of the subject site is designated Low Medium Residential and is improved with the Mulberry Early Education Center. To the west is Archibald Avenue and beyond that the property is designated Office and is vacant. The property to the east is designated Low Medium Residential and contains a single-family house. To the south is Arrow Route and beyond that the property is designated General Commercial and is improved with a commercial center; and C. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and d. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and f. This amendment is consistent with the adopted General Plan, including the housing element. The amendment will not affect the housing elements overarching goal to provide opportunities and incentives for the provision of a variety of housing types and for all economic segments wishing to reside in the community regardless of race, religion, sex, or income group. This amendment maintains the housing element goal of providing adequate housing sites to allow and create new opportunities that enable a broad range of housing types; and g. The remaining sites identified in the housing element are adequate to meet the requirements of California Government Code Section 65583.2 and to accommodate the City's share of the regional housing need pursuant to Section 65584. The City's regional housing need includes a requirement for 209 Very Low -Income housing units, 141 Low -Income housing units, 158 Moderate -Income housing units, and 340 Above Moderate -Income housing units for a total of 848 housing units. Pursuant to the housing element, the City has a capacity of 1,054 Very Low -Income and Low -Income housing units, and 4,812 Moderate -Income and Above Moderate - Income housing units; and h. With the adoption of this General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment, the City's housing capacity will be reduced by 3 Moderate -Income and Above Moderate -Income housing units. Accordingly, the remaining capacity of sites identified in the housing element at each income level will be as follows: 1,025 Very Low -Income and Low -Income housing units, and 3,529 Moderate -Income and Above Moderate -Income housing units. The City's remaining unmet housing need at each income level will be as follows: 191 Very Low - Income housing units, 130 Low -Income housing units, 127 Moderate -Income units, and 0 Above Moderate -Income housing units. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above - referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the subject property is suitable forthe uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area as the project site is currently developed as a service station land use, although it has been inactive since 2002. The project site is suitable for a service station land use, provides appropriate site Page 753 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 18-080 GPA DRC2015-00683 —ARCHIBALD OIL August 15, 2018 Page 3 access, has all utility services available, and can be conditioned to meet all related performance criteria and development standards for a service station and carwash facility. The vacant easterly parcel provides sufficient area for the development of a commercial land use consistent with all applicable development standards; and b. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties; the project site has been previously disturbed (development of the service station use) and by the surrounding residential, commercial, industrial, and educational development, and the project has been designed to appropriately address all applicable development standards; and C. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan as the proposed General Plan Amendment is consistent with General Plan policies LU -1.2 and LU -2.4. Policy LU -1.2 states "Designate appropriate land uses to serve the local needs and be able to respond to regional market needs, as appropriate." The re-establishment of the existing service station and development of the carwash land use will serve the local population's fuel and carwash needs, and will support the surrounding community's needs as both Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route are identified as Major Arterials (General Plan Figure CM -2) with a significant daily traffic volume. Policy LU -2.4 states "Promote complementary infill development, rehabilitation, and re- use that contribute positively to the surrounding residential neighborhood areas." The rehabilitation and re -use of this service station facility and the eventual infill development of the vacant easterly parcel will contribute positively to the surrounding residential area by permitting significant site plan and aesthetic improvements to an underutilized project site. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration; and b. The City Council has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The City Council further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the City Council. Based on these findings, the City Council adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration; and C. The City Council has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the Page 754 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 18-080 GPA DRC2015-00683 —ARCHIBALD OIL August 15, 2018 Page 4 mitigation measures during project implementation. The City Council adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project; and d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the City Council's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Council hereby approves General Plan Amendment No. DRC2015-00683, as depicted in Attachment A, attached hereto. 6. The City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby directed to: (a) certify to the adoption of this Resolution, and (b) forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail, return -receipt requested, Archibald Oil, LLC, at the address identified in City records. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 15TH DAY OF AUGUST 2018. Page 755 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 18-080 GPA DRC2015-00683 — ARCHIBALD OIL August 15, 2018 Page 5 General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 l 4 I'p, i — Archibald Oil =ias J Existing: Low Medium Residential Proposed: General Commercial "Mmi �M] Page 756 ORDINANCE NO. 937 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ZONING MAP AMENDMENT NO. DRC2015-00684, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE ZONING MAP LAND USE DISTRICT FROM THE LOW MEDIUM (LM) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT TO THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL (GC) DISTRICT FOR A 1.22 ACRE SITE LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND ARROW ROUTE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF — APNS: 0208-291-05 AND 0208-291-06. A. Recitals. 1. Archibald Oil filed an application for Zoning Map Amendment No. DRC2015-00684, as described in the title of this Ordinance. Hereinafter in this Ordinance, the subject Zoning Map Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On June 13, 2018, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and continued the application to the June 27, 2018 Planning Commission meeting. 3. On June 27, 2018, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and continued the application to the July 11, 2018 Planning Commission meeting 4. On July 11, 2018, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application DRC2015-00684 and issued Resolution No. 18-37 recommending to the City Council that the associated General Plan Amendment No. DRC2015-00683 be approved. 5. On August 15, 2018, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 6. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above - referenced public hearing on August 15, 2018, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to two parcels consisting of approximately 1.22 acres of land, basically a rectangular configuration, located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route and the westerly parcel is presently improved with an inoperative service station Page 757 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 937 ZMA DRC2015-00684 — ARCHIBALD OIL August 15, 2018 Page 2 and the easterly parcel is vacant. Said property is currently designated as Low Medium Residential; and b. The property to the north of the subject site is designated Low Medium Residential and is improved with the Mulberry Early Education Center. To the west is Archibald Avenue and beyond that the property is designated Office and is vacant. The property to the east is designated Low Medium Residential and contains a single-family house. To the south is Arrow Route and beyond that the property is designated General Commercial and is improved with a commercial center; and C. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and d. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above - referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the subject property is suitable forthe uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area as the project site is currently developed as a service station land use, although it has been inactive since 2002. The project site is suitable for a service station land use, provides appropriate site access, has all utility services available, and can be conditioned to meet all related performance criteria and development standards for a service station and carwash facility. The vacant easterly parcel provides sufficient area for the development of a commercial land use consistent with all applicable development standards; and b. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties; the project site has been previously disturbed (development of the service station use) and by the surrounding residential, commercial, industrial, and educational development, and the project has been designed to appropriately address all applicable development standards; and C. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan as the proposed General Plan Amendment is consistent with General Plan policies LU -1.2 and LU -2.4. Policy LU -1.2 states "Designate appropriate land uses to serve the local needs and be able to respond to regional market needs, as appropriate." The re-establishment of the existing service station and development of the carwash land use will serve the local population's fuel and carwash needs, and will support the surrounding community's needs as both Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route are identified as Major Arterials (General Plan Figure CM -2) with a significant daily traffic volume. Policy LU -2.4 states "Promote complementary infill development, rehabilitation, and re- use that contribute positively to the surrounding residential neighborhood areas." The rehabilitation and reuse of this service station facility and the eventual infill development of the Page 758 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 937 ZMA DRC2015-00684 — ARCHIBALD OIL August 15, 2018 Page 3 vacant easterly parcel will contribute positively to the surrounding residential area by permitting significant site plan and aesthetic improvements to an underutilized project site; and d. This amendment is consistent with the adopted General Plan, including the housing element. The amendment will not affect the housing elements overarching goal to provide opportunities and incentives for the provision of a variety of housing types and for all economic segments wishing to reside in the community regardless of race, religion, sex, or income group. This amendment maintains the housing element goal of providing adequate housing sites to allow and create new opportunities that enable a broad range of housing types; and e. The remaining sites identified in the housing element are adequate to meet the requirements of California Government Code Section 65583.2 and to accommodate the City's share of the regional housing need pursuant to Section 65584. The City's regional housing need includes a requirement for 209 Very Low -Income housing units, 141 Low -Income housing units, 158 Moderate -Income housing units, and 340 Above Moderate -Income housing units for a total of 848 housing units. Pursuant to the housing element, the City has a capacity of 1,054 Very Low -Income and Low -Income housing units, and 4,812 Moderate -Income and Above Moderate - Income housing units; and f. With the adoption of this General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment, the City's housing capacity will be reduced by 3 Moderate -Income and Above Moderate -Income housing units. Accordingly, the remaining capacity of sites identified in the housing element at each income level will be as follows: 1,025 Very Low -Income and Low -Income housing units, and 3,529 Moderate -Income and Above Moderate -Income housing units. The City's remaining unmet housing need at each income level will be as follows: 191 Very Low - Income housing units, 130 Low -Income housing units, 127 Moderate -Income units, and 0 Above Moderate -Income housing units. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and a Mitigation Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration; and b. The City Council has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The City Council further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the City Page 759 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 937 ZMA DRC2015-00684 — ARCHIBALD OIL August 15, 2018 Page 4 Council. Based on these findings, the City Council adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration; and C. The City Council has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The City Council adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project; and d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the City Council's decision is based, is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Council hereby recommends approval of Zoning Map Amendment No. DRC2015-00684, as depicted in Attachment A, attached hereto. 6. The City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby directed to: (a) certify to the adoption of this Ordinance, and (b) forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Ordinance, by certified mail, return -receipt requested, Archibald Oil, LLC, at the address identified in City records. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 15TH DAY OF AUGUST 2018. Page 760 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 937 ZMA DRC2015-00684 — ARCHIBALD OIL August 15, 2018 Page 5 MMEMMEMM Nil 101111111 II■ �� �,� �� � � : �■������■1111111 Illi �� �� ��111111- �■■■ � ■■ � _11111_ Arr®w Rte J, a Page 761 General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 Related Applications: Design Review DRC2015-00682 Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-00681 Variance DRC2016-00831 Minor Exception DRC2017-00879 City Council August 15, 2018 rAMA L - *Atll �Ay'! , . r � �ti • ��� _ �_ 9 :rte ,�� J , , y • - ice_ _ _ � . _ AIV - ILL 46. � .�.� � ��-�. � '�,; i!� yi r � �� � .��-�°. � tom,'-► � � �� • �� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Location Map 111 S I y l} mi rr 3 i I I i;; 4 4" t r I i . .I �F I` r - w 7 x g r_ y'f T GPA DRC2015-00683 • Two parcels at the NEC of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. • 1.22 acre site. • Proposed change from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial. • Proposal is consistent with GP policy: o LU -1.2: Designate needs and be able appropriate. appropriate land uses to serve the local to respond to regional market needs, as o LU -2.4: Promote complementary infill development, rehabilitation, and re -use that contribute positively to the surrounding residential neighborhood areas. • SB 166: No net loss of residential unit capacity. GPA DRC2015-00683 JLJLJ� P g:Low Medium Residential ed: General Commercial ZMA DRC2015-00684 • Two parcels at the NEC of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. • 1.22 acre site. • Proposed change from the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the General Commercial (GC) District. • Proposed ZMA is consistent with the proposed GPA. Il: �:•'"• CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Design Review • Project site contains an existing vacant service station building and fuel pump canopy. DRC2015-00982 Design Review DRC2015-00682 • Proposal includes: o Establish retail sales in the existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building. o Re-establish an existing 1,481 square foot fuel canopy with 4 fuel pumps. o Install a 968 square foot car wash. • Project was designed to comply with standards including building setbacks, circulation, and landscaping (except for Minor Exception applications). all Development Code building height, parking, requested Variance and Design Review 4 F DRC2015-00682 k i. 1� SCALE 1"=10 NORTH --I - - - - -- - ARROW ROUTE ---�--------- Design Review DRC2015-00682 E Hl�]H PARKING LOT =_ 1—rir. E TF- IT ❑ETE L -E TrF ��� �rrTr ii �� �urerv�cn r .-I iirr riaii r�.��� FIIH 71�- E IIII PETE � PROPOSED SITE PLAN I � ARROWrRO'UTL - TX. L "'TRANSFORMER .T -`'FEL, '� ;NI OE(ORATIVE f - EE' T f CEMENT BAND Design Review DRC2015-00682 • The existing service station building is constructed out of tan brick and terra cotta roof tiles and the fuel canopy is constructed out of metal posts and terra cotta roof tiles. • The applicant proposes a complete redesign of project architecture for the existing service station and fuel canopy buildings. • Building exterior is a mixture of earth tone colored stucco and stone veneer. It also incorporates a variety of materials, including stucco, fiber cement lap siding, stone, glass store front windows, and aluminum awnings. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Design Review DRC2015-00682 Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-00681 • The Development Code identifies that a CUP provides a process for a determination of requests for uses and activities whose effects on adjacent sites and surroundings need to be evaluated in terms of a specific development proposal for a specific site. • Uses qualifying for a Conditional Use Permit are: o Considered minor in nature. o Only have an impact on immediately adjacent properties. o Can be modified and/or conditioned to ensure compatibility. Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-00681 • Within the proposed GC District, service stations are a permitted land use, and car washes are permitted, subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. • The service station building and fuel pump canopy are existing and will be adapted for reuse. • The carwash building will be: o Located on the east side of the service station building. o Is designed for architectural compatibility. o Will operate as an automated facility. o Is situated on the parcel to minimize the potential for any impacts to adjacent property. Variance DRC2016-00831 • Project site is located in a proposed General Commercial (GC) District. • GC District requires a 10 foot interior side setback adjacent to residential. o Property to the north will remain in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District. o The setback area adjacent to parking and/or the building is to be landscaped. • Proposed site plan delineates 7 parking spaces on the site, 4 of which are located 5.5 feet from the north property line. Minor Exception DRC2017-00424 • Parking is based on a summation of parking requirements for retail, fuel sales, and carwash land uses. • Proposed site requires 8 parking spaces and provides 7. • Minor Exception may provide for a twenty-five percent (25%) reduction in the on-site parking requirement. • A Minor Exception application was submitted to reduce the total on-site parking by 1 parking space, a proposed 12.5 percent reduction in the on-site parking requirement. Environmental Review • Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study (IS) of the potential environmental effects of the project. • Based on the findings contained in that IS, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures related to Aesthetics, Air Quality, Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Geology and Soils, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Hydrology and Water Quality, Noise, and Tribal Cultural Resources there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. • Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) was prepared. City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the MND. • A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation measures for the project. Environmental Review • During circulation of the IS/MND staff received 3 comment letters: o On May 18, 2018, comments were received from Burrtec. o On May 23, 2018, comments were received from the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC). o On May 29, 2018, comments were received from the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). • The comment from Burrtec is reflected in the Conditions of Approval. • Responses from the applicant and their consultant address the DTCS and SCAQMD comments. Both agencies concurred with responses provided. Recommendation • Staff recommends the City Council take the following actions: o Adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project; and o Adopt Resolution No. 18-080 approving General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 and Ordinance No. 937 approving Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684. DATE: August 15, 2018 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Flavio H. Nunez, Management Analyst II SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING ON ISSUANCE OF TAX EXEMPT BONDS FOR THE DAY CREEK VILLAS SENIOR HOUSING COMPLEX AND CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF BONDS. RECOMMENDATION: Conduct a Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act Hearing in consideration of the issuance of tax-exempt bond financing by the California Statewide Communities Development Authority for the benefit of Day Creek Senior Housing Partners 2, L.P., to provide financing for the acquisition, construction and development of a 46 -unit multi -family rental housing project generally known as Day Creek Villas. Adopt a resolution approving the issuance of Bonds by the California Statewide Communities Development Authority not to exceed $15,000,000, for the benefit of Day Creek Senior Housing Partners 2, L.P., to provide financing for the acquisition, construction and development of a 46 -unit multi -family rental housing project generally known as Day Creek Villas. BACKGROUND: In September 2014, the Successor Agency entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement with a developer for the 14 acre site located at the northwest corner of Base Line Road and Day Creek Boulevard. The land transaction provided for the sale of the 14 acre site with the intent that 10 acres would be developed as a neighborhood commercial shopping center and 4 acres would be used to develop affordable senior housing. Construction on the 10 acre site has now been completed. In May 2016 the Successor Agency approved a Disposition, Development and Loan Agreement between the City, in its capacity as the Housing Successor Agency (HSA), and Day Creek Senior Housing Partners 2, LP (Developer) also known as National CORE for development of a 140 -unit multi -family affordable senior housing project. The developer is in process of assembling the project financing which includes state tax credits and tax exempt bonds. ANALYSIS: Day Creek Senior Housing Partners 2, L.P. (the "Borrower") has requested that the California Statewide Communities Development Authority ("CSCDA") serve as the municipal issuer of tax-exempt multi -family housing revenue bonds in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $15,000,000 (the "Bonds"). The proceeds from these tax-exempt Bonds will be used for the purpose of making a loan to the Borrower, to enable the Borrower to finance the acquisition, construction and development of 46 -units of the total 140 -unit affordable multi -family housing rental project located at 12194 and 12226 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California (the "Project"). The balance of the units will be financed with a 9% tax credit. The total project will be owned by the Borrower and operated by National Community Renaissance of California. Page 762 In order for all or a portion of the Bonds to qualify as tax-exempt bonds, the City must conduct a public hearing (the "TEFRA Hearing") providing the members of the community an opportunity to speak in favor of or against the use of tax-exempt bonds for the financing of the Project. Adoption of the resolution is solely for the purposes of satisfying the requirements of the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act (TEFRA), the Internal Revenue Code and the California Government Code Section 6500. A public notice announcing the Public Hearing was published on July 27, 2018 (Attachment 1). As of this day, no comments from the public have been received. CSCDA is a joint powers authority sponsored by the League of California Cities ("League") and the California State Association of Counties ("CSAC"). CSCDA was created by the League and CSAC in 1988 to enable local government and eligible private entities access to low-cost, tax-exempt financing for projects that provide a tangible public benefit, contribute to social and economic growth, and improve the overall quality of life in local communities throughout California. CSCDA is comprised of more than 530 members, including the City of Rancho Cucamonga. CSCDA has issued more than $60 billion through 1,500 plus financings since 1988 and consistently ranks in the top 10 of more than 3,000 nationwide public issuers of tax-exempt debt, as measured by annual issuance amount. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact to the City. The Bonds will be issued as limited obligations of CSCDA, payable solely from revenues and receipts derived from a loan to be made by CSCDA to the Borrower with the Bond proceeds. The City bears no liability with respect to the issuance of the Bonds. Further, the City is not a party to any of the financing documents related to the Bond issuance and is not named in any of the disclosure documents describing the Bonds or the proposed financing. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This resolution would address the Council's goal of enhancing the City's position as the premier community in the region by providing high-quality affordable housing opportunities. ATTACHMENTS: Description Copy of Public Hearing Notice Resolution Page 763 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING ISSUANCE OF MULTIFAMILY HOUSING REVENUE BONDS FOR DAY CREEK VILLAS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, at 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter can be heard, on Wednesday, August 15, 2018, at the City Council Chambers, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City") will conduct a public hearing as required by Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, at which it will hear and consider information concerning a proposed plan of financing providing for the issuance by the California Statewide Communities Development Authority of multifamily housing revenue bonds in one or more series issued from time to time, including bonds issued to refund such revenue bonds in one or more series from time to time, and at no time to exceed $15,000,000 in outstanding aggregate principal amount, to finance the acquisition, construction and development of a 46 -unit senior multifamily rental housing project located at 12194 and 12226 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The facilities are to be owned by a limited partnership formed by National Community Renaissance of California (the "Borrower"), operated by National Community Renaissance of California, and are generally known as Day Creek Villas (the "Project"). Those wishing to comment on the proposed financing and the nature and location of the Project may either appear in person at the public hearing or submit written comments, which must be received by the City prior to the hearing. Written comments should be sent to City of Rancho Cucamonga at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Attention: City Clerk. CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Dated: July 27, 2018 4125-7697-5893.1 Page 764 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING THE ISSUANCE BY THE CALIFORNIA STATEWIDE COMMUNITIES DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF MULTI -FAMILY HOUSING REVENUE BONDS FOR THE DAY CREEK VILLAS WHEREAS, the California Statewide Communities Development Authority (the "Authority") is authorized pursuant to the provisions of California Government Code Section 6500 et seq. and the terms of an Amended and Restated Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement, dated as of June 1, 1988 (the "Agreement"), among certain local agencies throughout the State of California, including the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), to issue revenue bonds in accordance with Chapter 7 of Part 5 of Division 31 of the California Health and Safety Code for the purpose of financing multi -family rental housing projects; and WHEREAS, a limited partnership formed by National Community Renaissance of California (the "Borrower"), has requested that the Authority adopt a plan of financing providing for the issuance of multi -family housing revenue bonds (the "Bonds") in one or more series issued from time to time, including bonds issued to refund such revenue bonds in one or more series from time to time, and at no time to exceed $15,000,000 in outstanding aggregate principal amount, to finance the acquisition, construction and development of a 46 -unit senior multi -family rental housing project located at 12194 and 12226 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California, generally known as Day Creek Villas (the "Project") and operated by National Community Renaissance of California; and WHEREAS, the Bonds or a portion thereof will be "private activity bonds" for purposes of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the "Code"); and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 147(f) of the Code, prior to their issuance, private activity bonds are required to be approved by the "applicable elected representative" of the governmental units on whose behalf such bonds are expected to be issued and by a governmental unit having jurisdiction over the entire area in which any facility financed by such bonds is to be located, after a public hearing held following reasonable public notice; and WHEREAS, the members of this City Council (this "City Council") are the applicable elected representatives of the City; and WHEREAS, there has been published, at least 14 days prior to the date hereof, in a newspaper of general circulation within the City, a notice that a public hearing regarding the Bonds would be held on a date specified in such notice; and WHEREAS, such public hearing was conducted on such date, at which time an opportunity was provided to interested parties to present arguments both for and against the issuance of the Bonds; and WHEREAS, the Authority is also requesting that the City Council approve the issuance of any refunding bonds hereafter issued by the Authority for the purpose of refinancing 4125-7697-5893.1 Page 765 the Bonds which financed the Project (the "Refunding Bonds"), but only in such cases where federal tax laws would not require additional consideration or approval by the City Council; and WHEREAS, it is intended that this resolution shall constitute the approval of the issuance of the Bonds required by Section 147(f) of the Code and Section 9 of the Agreement; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The above recitals are true and correct. Section 2. The City Council hereby approves the issuance of the Bonds and the Refunding Bonds by the Authority. It is the purpose and intent of the City Council that this resolution constitute approval of the Bonds for the purposes of (a) Section 147(f) of the Code and (b) Section 9 of the Agreement. Section 3. The officers of the City are hereby authorized and directed, jointly and severally, to do any and all things and to execute and deliver any and all documents that they deem necessary or advisable in order to carry out, give effect to and comply with the terms and intent of this resolution and the financing approved hereby. Section 4. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga at a regular meeting of said Council held on the 15th day of August, 2018, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk 4125-7697-5893.1 Page 766 DATE: August 15, 2018 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH THE CHAFFEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT ESTABLISHING A PARTNERSHIP FOR PUBLIC ART DISPLAYS AT CITY HALL. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council authorize the Mayor to execute the MOU with the Chaffey Community College District. BACKGROUND: In 2015, the City Council established a goal of creating a public art master plan that would address the funding and ongoing maintenance of public art in the community. In July 2017, the City Council adopted Ordinance 912, amending the Municipal Code regarding Creative Placemaking and Public Art. That same ordinance also established a new Public Art Committee for the purposes of supporting public art and reviewing proposals for public art to be funded through the new Public Art Trust Fund. ANALYSIS: As City staff began work to implement a public art program as directed by the City Council, discussions began with Chaffey College's Wignall Museum of Contemporary Art concerning a possible partnership for public art exhibits at City Hall. Located on the Chaffey College campus, the Wignall Museum is a teaching museum and interdisciplinary art space that cultivates direct engagement with works of art through exhibitions, education, and other community programming. Chaffey College and the Wignall Museum are valuable community assets, and a partnership to extend the Museum's reach into City Hall will provide the City's customers with exposure to the work of our local contemporary artists. The proposed MOU (Attachment 1) provides a framework for an ongoing partnership for the display of contemporary art on a rotating basis at City Hall. Highlights of the MOU include the following: • The Museum will provide art pieces on loan to the City, with Museum curators developing each exhibit in consultation with the City each year. • The City will provide display spaces and partner to promote each exhibit, and labor for installation and/or preparation of display spaces. • The parties agree to each contribute up to $2,000 per year toward modest expenses such as artist honoraria, printing of interpretive brochures and signage, art installation and/or moving expenses, and other similar expenses. The parties envision that an opening artists' reception will likely be planned for each exhibit, so the community can meet the featured artists. Page 767 The City agrees to be responsible to repair or replace, in like value, any art piece that is damaged or destroyed as a result of the sole, negligent act or omission of any City employee or volunteer. The Museum will provide the City with a state value of each art piece prior to installation. The City will procure appropriate insurance coverage through its existing insurance provider's program for the display of public art to cover any items displayed. The MOU has an initial term of two (2) years, and will automatically renew for up to three (3) additional one (1) year terms, unless otherwise terminated by either party with at least thirty (30) days prior written notice. If approved, it is anticipated that the first City Hall art exhibit would be installed in late Summer/early Fall of this year. FISCAL IMPACT: Direct costs are not to exceed $2,000 annually to the City. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This item is part of ongoing efforts to address the Council's 2015 goal of developing a public art master plan to implement a vibrate public art program. ATTACHMENTS: Description MOU with Chaffey College Page 768 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND CHAFFEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT This MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ("MOU"), is entered into this 20"' day of June, 2018 ("effective date"), by and between the City of Rancho Cucamonga ("City") and Chaffey Community College District, by and through its Museum of Contemporary Art ("Art Museum"). A. Recitals. (i) Art Museum desires to provide greater exposure to the public of contemporary art pieces in its collection. (ii) City desires to assist Art Museum, and to aesthetically enhance specified areas of City's City Hall through the temporary placement of art pieces provided by the Art Museum. (iii) It is the City's and Art Museum's intent in entering this MOU to set forth terms and conditions under which contemporary art pieces provided by Art Museum will be temporarily placed in specified locations for public display in City's City Hall. B. Understanding of the Parties. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties to this Memorandum of Understanding agree as follows: The facts set forth in the Recitals, above, are true and correct. 2. Within thirty (30) days of the date first set forth above, or otherwise as agreed upon in writing by the parties, representatives of each party, as designated herein, shall meet and confer and shall utilize their best efforts to agree upon a written schedule for the following year during which the Art Museum will provide art pieces to the City, on a no cost, loan basis, to publicly display in specific areas of City's City Hall, as the parties may agree. The written schedule shall include the dates of each display, and a general description of each of the art pieces and overall theme of the display (each, a "display series".) Each year thereafter, City's and Art Museum's designated representatives shall again meet and use their best efforts to agree upon a new schedule of display series for the following year. Each agreed-upon written schedule shall be deemed to be incorporated by reference herein upon execution by the parties' designated representatives. Notwithstanding the foregoing, each party agrees to contribute up to $2000 per year, payable to third parties such as student artists or guest artists, to support one or more displays. 3. City will provide display areas and will utilize reasonable efforts to promote Art Museum's art displays at City Hall by providing promotional notices on its website and/or providing other public outreach at City's expense and discretion. 11231-0001\2184708vl.doc Page 769 4. Each art piece in a display series will be reviewed in advance by the City's designated representative. Understanding that City Hall must function primarily as the center of the City's business operations on behalf of the public and not as an art museum, it is necessary, and Art Museum agrees, that the City's designated representative, in consultation with City officials as may be deemed necessary, shall have the right to disapprove placement of any art piece, if such art piece or display is determined to be inconsistent with the primary business purpose of City Hall. 5. Unless otherwise agreed upon in writing, each display series will be themed and only one display series will be displayed at City's City Hall at any time. 6. Prior to the provision of any art pieces by the Art Museum, Art Museum shall provide City with a stated value of each art piece. 7. City will provide all necessary labor to install the art pieces by way of hanging, or otherwise preparing and making available a display area, subject to the direction of the Art Museum's curator and City's final approval. City's and Art Museum's designated representatives are as follows: City: John Gillison, City Manager 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Art Museum: Rebecca Trawick, Director/Curator 5885 Haven Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91737 City and Art Museum agree that City shall have no responsibility to repair or replace loaned art pieces that are stolen or damaged as a result of criminal acts by third parties. City agrees to be responsible to repair or replace, in like value, any art piece that is damaged or destroyed as a result of the sole, negligent act or omission of any City employee or volunteer provided, however, that the replacement value of any such art piece shall not exceed the stated value as provided by Art Museum pursuant to this MOU. 8. Consistent with Section 7, above, City's responsibility for each art piece on display at City Hall shall commence upon completion of installation and City approval, and shall terminate upon physical delivery of each art piece to an authorized employee, agent, or volunteer of the Art Museum. 9. The term of this MOU is two years provided, however, that this MOU shall automatically renew for up to three (3) additional, one (1) year terms, unless sooner terminated. Either party may terminate this MOU at any time by providing the other with not less than thirty (30) days prior written notice. On or before the termination date, the parties shall cooperate in good faith in the removal and delivery of the art pieces to an authorized employee, agent, or volunteer of the Art Museum. Thereafter, neither party shall have any other obligation to the other party except as expressly provided herein. -2- 1123 1-000 1 \2184708v l .doc Page 770 10. By executing this MOU, Art Museum consents to and releases City from any and all liability for duplicating, copying or otherwise utilizing images of any of the pieces of art on display at City Hall for purposes of promoting the City and any art piece or the overall art display. Any such use by City will include the City crediting the Art Museum. At no time will City utilize any such images for any commercial purpose except as otherwise agreed upon in writing by the Art Museum. 11. To the maximum extent permitted by law, City shall defend, indemnify and hold Chaffey College, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers free and harmless, including payment of reasonable attorneys fees, with respect to any and all claims and liabilities arising out of negligent acts or omissions or willful misconduct attributable to City in furtherance of this MOU. 12. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Chaffey College shall defend, indemnify and hold City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers free and harmless, including payment of reasonable attorney's fees, with respect to any and all claims and liabilities arising out of negligent acts or omissions or willful misconduct attributable to Chaffey College in furtherance of this MOU. THIS MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING has been executed as of the date first set forth above. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAFFEY COMMUNITY COLL E DISTRICT By: By. -3- 11231-0001\2184708v1.doc Page 771