Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2017/05/24 - Minutes - PC-HPCIWIPA1 L-Tii LV 1 r HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA A. 7:00 P.M. - CALL TO ORDER Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call: Chairman Oaxaca A Vice Chairman Macias X Commissioner Fletcher X Commissioner Munoz _X_ Commissioner Wimberly _X_ Additional Staff Present Candyce Burnett, City Planner: Jim Markman. City Attorney, Tom Grahn. Associate • Planner. Brian Sandona, Associate Engineer; Jennifer Nakamura, Associate Planner. Dominick Perez, Associate Planner. Lois Schrader. Planning Commission Secretary: Mike Smith. Senior Planner. Tabe van der Zwaag. Associate Planner: Nikki Cavazos. Assistant Planner. Dat Tran. Assistant Planner B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Historic Preservation Commission or Planning Commission on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Commission from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Commission may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals embers of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. None C. CONSENT CALENDAR/HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION Page 1 of 14 MAY 249 2017 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non -controversial. They will be acted upon by the Commission at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed for discussion. C1, Consideration to approve the Regular Meeting Minutes of May 10, 2017 C2. Consideration to approve the Adjourned Meeting (Workshop) Minutes of May 10, 2017 C3. Consideration of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Capital Improvement Program for Fiscal Year 2017/18 The Commission found the Capital Improvement Program in conformance with the General Plan. Moved by Fletcher, seconded by Munoz, carried 4-0-1 (Oaxaca absent) to adopt the Consent Calendar. D. PUBLIC HEARINGS/HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Chairman may open the meeting for public input. D1. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS - DRC2016-00966 - NATIONAL COMMUNITY RENAISSANCE OF CALIFORNIA - A request to remove an on -site tree that has been determined to be a Designated Local Landmark related to the site plan and architectural review of a 140-unit affordable senior housing development on 4 acres of land within the Low -Medium (LM) District (4 — 8 dwelling units per acre) of the Victoria Planned Community, located at the terminus of Firehouse Court and west of Day Creek Boulevard. APN: 1089-031-36. Related records: General Plan Amendment DRC2016-00964, Design Review DRC2016-00814, Density Bonus Agreement DRC2017- 00156, Variance DRC2017-00032 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2016-00965. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. CONTINUED FROM MAY 10, 2017 Vice Chairman Macias noted the public hearing was still open for this item frorn the meeting of May 10, 2017 and that the meetings of the Historic Preservation Commission and Planning Cot rvnission had been opened concurrently. He then asked for the staff report. Tabe van der Zsvaag. Associate Planner gave a PowerPoint presentation (copy on file). He . noted that there were concerns regarding the environmental study and staff has addressed those concerns. Page 2 of 14 IWIP% r L-r� &.v I I HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Alexa Nashburn of National Community Renaissance gave a PowerPoint presentation regarding the history of her organization and that they work as a public/private partnership and they are a non-profit. Commissioner Fletcher asked where the two bedroom units are placed in the development. Detlev Peiker, Architect of RM Design Group said the 2 bed units in are located in 3 different areas around the project perimeter. Vice Chairman Macias cornmented with respect to housing needs. these are important projects because any city should have accommodations for all economic groups. He said he thinks it's a good project. He invited public comment and hearing none, closed the public hearing. Item D1 was heard in conjunction with Items E1-E5 Moved by Wimberly, seconded by Fletcher, carried4-0-1 (Oaxaca absent) to adopt the Resolution approving Certificate of Appropriateness DRC2016-00966. E. PUBLIC HEARINGS/PLANNING COMMISSION The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chairman will open the public hearing to receive testimony. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual or less as determined by the Chairman. Please sign in after speaking. El. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2016-00964 — NATIONAL COMMUNITY RENAISSANCE OF CALIFORNIA - A request to modify General Plan Figure LU-8 related to the removal of the Historic Resource Designation of an on -site tree related to the site plan and architectural review of a 140-unit affordable senior housing development on 4 acres of land within the Low -Medium (LM) District (4 — 8 dwelling units per acre) of the Victoria Planned Community, located at the terminus of Firehouse Court and west of Day Creek Boulevard. APN: 1089-031-36. Related records: Design Review DRC2016- 00814, Density Bonus Agreement DRC2017-00156, Certificate of Appropriateness DRC2016- 00966, Variance DRC2017-00032 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2016-00965. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. This item will be forwarded to the City Council for final action. CONTINUED FROM MAY 10, 2017 Page 3 of 14 MAY 249 2017 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA E2. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DENSITY BONUS AGREEMENT DRC2017-00156 — NATIONAL COMMUNITY RENAISSANCE OF CALIFORNIA —A Density Bonus Agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and National Community Renaissance of California, for the purpose of providing a senior housing project in accordance with the Victoria Community Plan and the Development Code, including deviating from certain development standards, for the development of a 140-unit affordable senior housing development on 4 acres of land within the Low -Medium (LM) District (4 — 8 dwelling units per acre) of the Victoria Planned Community, located at the terminus of Firehouse Court and west of Day Creek Boulevard. APN: 1089-031-36. Related records: General Plan Amendment DRC2016-00964, Certificate of Appropriateness DRC2016-00966, Design Review DRC2016-00814, Variance DRC2017-00032 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2016-00965. Staff has prepared a Mitigated • Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. This item will be forwarded to the City Council for final action. CONTINUED FROM MAY 10, 2017 E3. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2016-00814 — NATIONAL COMMUNITY RENAISSANCE OF CALIFORNIA - A request for site plan and architectural review of a 140-unit affordable senior housing development on 4 acres of land within the Low - Medium (LM) District (4 — 8 dwelling units per acre) of the Victoria Planned Community, located at the terminus of Firehouse Court and west of Day Creek Boulevard. APN: 1089-031- 36. Related records: General Plan Amendment DRC2016-00964, Certificate of Appropriateness DRC2016-00966, Density Bonus Agreement DRC2017-00156, Variance DRC2017-00032 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2016-00965. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. CONTINUED FROM MAY 10, 2017 E4. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VARIANCE - DRC2017-00032 - NATIONAL COMMUNITY RENAISSANCE OF CALIFORNIA - A request to permit walls over 8 feet in height due to on -site grades related to the site plan and architectural review of a 140-unit affordable senior housing development on 4 acres of land within the Low -Medium (LM) District (4 — 8 dwelling units per acre) of the Victoria Planned Community, located at the terminus of Firehouse Court and west of Day Creek Boulevard. APN: 1089-031-36. Related records: General Plan Amendment DRC2016-00964, Certificate of Appropriateness DRC2016-00966, Design Review DRC2016-00814, Density Bonus Agreement DRC2017-00156 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2016-00965. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. CONTINUED FROM MAY 10, 2017 . Page 4 of 14 MAY 24, 2017 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA E5. ENVIRONMENT ASSESSMENT AND TREE REMOVAL PERMIT - DRC2016-00965 - NATIONAL COMMUNITY RENAISSANCE OF CALIFORNIA - A request to remove 1 on -site tree related to the site plan and architectural review of a 140-unit affordable senior housing development on 4 acres of land within the Low -Medium (LM) District (4 — 8 dwelling units per acre) of the Victoria Planned Community, located at the terminus of Firehouse Court and west of Day Creek Boulevard. APN: 1089-031-36. Related records: General Plan Amendment DRC2016-00964, Certificate of Appropriateness DRC2016-00966, Design Review DRC2016- 00814, Density Bonus Agreement DRC2017-00156 and Variance DRC2017-00032. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. CONTINUED FROM MAY 10, 2017 For items El and E2 (See itern D 1 for minutes) Moved by Wimberly. seconded by Fletcher, carried 4-0-1 (Oaxaca absent) to adopt the Resolutions recommending approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2016-00964 and Density Bonus Agreement DRC2017-00156 to be forwarded to the City Council for final action with the recommendation to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts. For Items E3-E5 Moved by Wimberly, seconded by Fletcher, carried 4-0-1 (Oaxaca absent) to adopt the Resolutions of Approval for Design Review DRC2016-00814, Variance DRC2017-00032, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2016-00965. E6. DESIGN REVIEW DRC2015-00991 — WECARE DIALYSIS CENTER — The development of a 10,912 square foot medical office building on 1.13 acres in the General Commercial (GC) District, on the east side of Grove Avenue, approximately 500 feet south of Arrow Route, located at 8591 Grove Avenue - APN: 0207-222-27. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA guidelines as a Class 32 Exemption (CEQA Section 15332) for In -fill Development Projects. CONTINUANCE REQUESTED Tom Grahn, Associate Planner, noted that because the property was not properly posted, the item has been re -advertised for the June 14th meeting date and staff requests a continuance. Vice Chairman Macias asked if there was any public continent and seeing and hearing none • asked for a motion. Page 5 of 14 MAY 249 2017 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA For item E6 Moved by Fletcher; seconded by Munoz. carried 4-0-1 (Oaxaca) to continue Design Review DRC2015-00991 to the June 14. 2017 rneeting date. ET DESIGN REVIEW DRC2016-00417 - ROGER WONG — A review of a proposal to construct a 4,250 square foot office building on one developed parcel with an area of 15,726 square feet (0.37 acres) in the Commercial Office (CO) District, Foothill Boulevard Overlay District, (FBOD), located at the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Malachite Avenue at 9533 Foothill Boulevard — APN - 0208-261-14. Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines as a Class 32 (CEQA Guidelines Section 15332) exemption, which covers in -fill development on no more than 5 acres substantially surrounded Is urban uses. Related files: Pre -Application Review DRC2015-00444 and Uniform Sign Program DRC2016-01036. E8. UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM DRC2016-01036 - ROGER WONG - A review of a uniform sign program for a 4,250 square foot office building on one developed parcel with an area of 15,726 square feet (0.37 acres) in the Commercial Office (CO) District, Foothill Boulevard Overlay District, (FBOD), located at the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Malachite Avenue at 9533 Foothill Boulevard — APN: 0208-261-14. Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines as a Class 32 (CEQA Guidelines Section 15332) exemption, which covers in -fill development on no more than 5 acres substantially surrounded by urban uses. Related files: Pre -Application Review DRC2015-00444 and Design Review DRC2016-00417. Nikki Cavazos, Assistant Planner gave a PowerPoint presentation (copy on file) and noted the standard conditions are before the Commissioners as they were inadvertently left out of the agenda. She indicated the applicant previously reviewed and agreed to all the conditions. Commissioner Fletcher asked if the DRC reviewed the Uniform Sign Program. PAs. Cavazos stated they did. Commissioner Wimberly did not recall the Route 66 sign being reviewed. He said it looks like it takes over the architecture of the building. He asked if there is a requirerneot for it to be . located in that place. Page 6 of 14 IWIM I LTY !6V I / HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Ms. Cavazos stated it is the applicant's request -similar to their "stamp 'or) the project. Commissioner Fletcher stated the In God Ne Trust" and 'Route 66" signs are not building identification signs and they do riot look appropriate for the design. He said they appear tacked on and not consistent. He asked if the Route 66 sign could go somewhere else such as near the sidewalk. Ms. Cavazos pointed out that the portion reviewed by the DRC was for tenant signs. She said they must submit a final sign program as part of their conditions of approval. She said staff could contact the applicant regarding their removal. She said part of their USP is to show where the signs go. • Commissioner Fletcher said he likes the building design, but not the signs. He said he would like to see the USP go back for discussion. Vice Chairman Macias said the placement of the signs could be altered and noted their sign approval process is still not complete. Ryan McGowan of Civic Design Group stated the property owner is present. He said they could put the signs on a future review. Vice Chairman Macias asked the applicant if they understand that where the sign is placed now is under question. Jim Markman, City Attorney, said the Commission can approve the building and delay the decision on the sign program. Commissioner Fletcher said those 2 signs are not compatible with other signs for the other tenants. Mr. McGowan explained that the owner's offices will be at this building and it was his choice as he will occupy the upper floor and a portion of the lower floor. Cornrnissioner Munoz clarified and asked if the applicant is only agreeing to discuss it or agrees to remove them from the building. • Mr. Markman said we need to be clear the signs are not acceptable. Page 7 of 14 MAY 24, 2017 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Ms Cavazos restated that the USP was only for tenant signage Commissioner Munoz reiterated that this has to do with the actual design of the building and that he needs to ask the applicant to agree to remove sign. Roger Wong, project ownerlapplicant said the signs are part of creating a Route 65 theme - they are not so much pail of signage program. Vice Chairman Macias noted the consensus of the Commission and said they can approve the design without the signs. Mr. Wong said ok, he is comfortable with that decision. is Vice Chairman Macias asked if there was any public comment. Seeing and hearing no comment, he closed the public hearing. Commissioner Fletcher said staff did good job on the contemporary design. He said with the 2 signs removed it will be an improvement as they distracted from the architecture. He asked the applicant to work with staff to find a way to acknowledge Route 66, Commissioner Wimberly concurred that the USP approved tenant sign placement alone -he agreed the signs take away from the architecture. Commissioner Munoz concurred and supported the project. Vice Chairman Macias said he had assumed that the signage was part of the USP. For Items E7 and E8 Moved by Fletcher, seconded by Wimberly, carried 4-0-1 (Oaxaca absent) to adopt the Resolutions of Approval for Design Review DRC2016-00417 and Uniform Sign Program DRC2016-01036 but eliminating the two objectionable signs (Route 66 and In God We Trust) from the building design. The applicant will 'work with staff to find an alternative solution. E9. TIME EXTENSION DRC2017-00238 - WESTERN STATES DEVELOPMENT, INC. - A request to allow for a one (1) year time extension of a previously approved 11 lot Tentative Tract Map (SUBTT17769) on 2.98 acres of land in the Low Residential (L) District (2-4 dwelling is per acre), located at the southwest corner of Beryl Street and 19th Street - APN: 0202- 461-62,-63, and -65. On June 11, 2008, a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental Page 8 of 14 IWIP%I L-Ti !LV I HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA impacts was adopted by the Planning Commission for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17769 under Resolution 08-29. Staff finds the project to be within the scope of the prior Mitigated Negative Declaration. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects or minor revisions to the projects within the scope of the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. CONTINUANCE REQUESTED Dal Tran. Assistant Planner stated that because the time extension request is still under review, and there are additional issues to address, staff requests a continuance to an unspecified date. • For Item E9 Moved by Munoz, seconded by Wimberly, carried 4-0-1 (Oaxaca absent) to continue Time Extension DRC2017-00238 to an unspecified (late. El0. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2016-00931 — CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES FOR IDS REAL ESTATE GROUP — A request to amend the Empire Lakes Specific Plan to increase the allowable Floor Area Ratio (FAR) from 0.35 to 0.50 for buildings within Planning Area 5 of the specific plan to allow for the construction of a logistics building of 232,058 square feet on a partially developed property comprised of five (5) parcels with a combined area 515,690 square feet (11.84 acres) located at the northeast corner of 4th Street and Utica Avenue - APNs: 0210-082-78, -79, -84, -89 and -90. Related files: Design Review DRC2016-00670 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2016-00671. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. This item will be forwarded to the City Council for final action. El1. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2016-00670 — CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES FOR IDS REAL ESTATE GROUP — A review of a proposal to construct a logistics building of 232,058 square feet on a partially developed property comprised of five (5) parcels with a combined area 515,690 square feet (11.84 acres) in Planning Area 5, of the Empire Lakes Specific Plan, located at the northeast corner of 4th Street and Utica Avenue - APNs: 0210-082-78, -79, -84, -89 and -90. Related Files: Specific Plan Amendment DRC2016-00931 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2016-00671. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. E12. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2016-00671 — • CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES FOR IDS REAL ESTATE GROUP — A review of a proposal to remove existing trees on a partially developed property to allow for the construction Page 9 of 14 24, HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA of a logistics building of 232,058 square feet on a property comprised of five (5) parcels with a combined area 515,690 square feet (11.84 acres) in Planning Area 5, of the Empire Lakes Specific Plan, located at the northeast corner of 4th Street and Utica Avenue - APNs: 0210- 082-78, -79, -84, -89 and -90. Related Files: Specific Plan Amendment DRC2016-00931 and Design Review DRC2016-00670. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. Dominick Perez, Associate Planner, stated 2 letters were received regarding the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration and because the concerns stated in the letter may take lime to resolve. staff is requesting a continuance to an unspecified date. For Items E10-E 12 • Moved by Fletcher, seconded by Wimberly. carried 4-0-1 (Oaxaca absent) to continue Specific Plan Amendment DRC2016-00931. Design Review DRC2016-00670 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2016-00671 to an unspecified date. Ell 3. MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT DRC2017-00177 — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA — A request to amend Titles 2, 3 and 17 of the Municipal Code to enact requirements and standards for art in public places. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA guidelines under CEQA section 15601(b)(3). This item will be forwarded to the City Council for final action. Jennifer Nakamura, Associate Planner gave a Powerpoint Presentation (copy on file). Commissioner Fletcher noted that flexibility has been added. He asked if any comments 'were received frorn stakeholders, BIA, or the Chamber: He said he can see where the developer could build in a valuable enhancement to his project. Ms. Nakamura said they had a variety of concerns such as the fees. She said they were too high and prohibitive. She said most of their concerns have been addressed. She said they wanted flexibility about the artists that could be used -she said the City has no preference but we do want recognized artists or experts in their field. She said they wanted phasing for larger longer projects so they could install when it works for their phasing. She said overall, the groups thought the concept of adding art adds value but they want it to i✓ak for everyone. She said the Lev✓is group was the main voice of the BIA and gave us ideas and we believe we reached some middle ground. Creating spaces/places falls in line with what they want to is in development. Page 10 of 14 nlM 1 LTy LV I I HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Commissioner Fletcher asked if for example Empire Lakes/rnixed use development what would be considered to determine the fee and if it would also go to the DRC for review along with the development application. He asked if they would always go to DRC. Ms Nakarpura reported that the number of residential units as well as the amount of commercial space would be calculated. Vice Chairman Macias clarified that the developer has a choice; they can build on site, donate or pay an in lieu fee. Ms. Nakamura said that is true but we prefer they install the art. is Commissioner Fletcher asked if for smaller developments if their fees go into a fund. Ms. Nakamura said they can and the Art Committee will advise the City Council as to how those funds are spent, the selection process of pieces and the design of the art. Commissioner Fletcher asked if the funds can be banked. Ms. Nakamura said we are allowed to bank the money for 10 years or the developer can request it be returned to the developer if they are still un-used at that point the unless City Council determines the funds will be saved for a specific. larger art project in the future (beyond the 10 years). Vice Chairman Macias noted the Art Committee would be responsible for creating the priorities of how those banked funds would be used. He then opened the public hearing and seeing and hearing no comment, closed the public hearing. For Itern E13 Moved by Munoz, seconded by Wimberly. carried4-0-1 (Oaxaca absent) to adopt the Resolution Recommending Approval of Municipal Code Amendment DRC2017-00177 to be forwarded to the City Council for final action. E14. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT20073 — LEWIS MANAGEMENT CORP. — A review of a proposed subdivision of a property of about 84 acres into twenty-six (26) parcels and one (1) lettered lot located within the Empire Lakes Specific Plan, Planning Area 1, located north of • 4th Street, south of 6th Street, west of Milliken Avenue, and east of Utica/Cleveland Avenues APNs: 0210-082-41, -49, and -52. Related files: General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00114, Page 11 of 14 MAY 249 2017 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Specific Plan Amendment DRC2015-00040, Development Code Amendment DRC2015- 00115, and Pre -Application Review DRC2017-00170. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City certified an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) on May 18, 2016 in connection with the City's approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00114, Specific Plan Amendment DRC2015-00040, and Development Code Amendment DRC2015-00115. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project. CONTINUANCE REQUESTED Mike Smith, Senior Planner. noted that because of a posting error, staff is requesting a continuance to the June 14th meeting date. For Item E14 • Moved by Munoz, seconded by Wimberly, carried 4-0-1 to continue Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20073 to the June 14, 2017 meeting date. F. COMMISSION BUSINEWHISTORIC PRESERVATION AND PLANNING COMMISSION INTER -AGENCY UPDATES: None COMMISSION ANNOUNCEMENTS: None G. ADJOURNMENT The Planning Commission adjourned to a workshop to discuss Pre -Application Review DRC2017-00170 - Lewis Management Corp. to be held in the DeAnza Room, I, Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on May 18, 2017 seventy two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. Page 12 of 14 JV1r% 1 ! -111`1 LV 1 1 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 11 sl Lois J. Schrader Planning Commission Secretary City of Rancho Cucamonga INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After speaking, please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium. It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under "Public Comments." There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda. Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. A copy of any such materials should also be provided to the Secretary to be used for the official public record. • All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. Requests for scheduling agenda items will be at the discretion of the Commission and the Planning Director. Page 13 of 14 MAY 249 2017 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., except for legal City holidays. J2lXc11K Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of $2,662 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas, staff reports and minutes can be found at www.CityofRC.us.• Page 14 of 14